{"archetype": {"name": "Abductive Explanation Selection", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:abductive_explanation_selection", "slug": "abductive_explanation_selection"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 2 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 2}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system, investigator, analyst, clinician, engineer, or group faces an observation that existing expectations do not readily explain. Waiting for complete proof may delay action, but accepting the first plausible story may create premature closure, confirmation bias, misdiagnosis, false accusation, or brittle design decisions.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Diagnose explanation selection under anomalous evidence while preserving provisionality and rival causes."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any listed literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "The reconciled route preserves the final-method diagnostic relation while excluding goals, feasibility conditions, and application constraints."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Its mandatory pattern starts from a surprising explanation-seeking observation and treats explanatory support as defeasible rather than decisive. Under legal role renaming this entails the complete atom predicate.", "role_mapping": "Mandatory abductive reasoning roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: A surprising or anomalous observation requires explanation.", "slug": "abductive_reasoning", "tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b001_a01_ae_a1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The observation may be a symptom, trace, failure, behavior, artifact, data pattern, report, or contradiction that is not yet understood. In this condition set, the requirement is: A surprising or anomalous observation requires explanation.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A surprising or anomalous observation needs explanation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER", "name": "Abductive Reasoning", "one_liner": "Infer the hypothesis that would best explain a surprising observation, accepted provisionally and held defeasibly against better candidates.", "page_ref": "prime:abductive_reasoning", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Mandatory abductive reasoning roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: A surprising or anomalous observation requires explanation.", "slug": "abductive_reasoning", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Its mandatory pattern starts from a surprising explanation-seeking observation and treats explanatory support as defeasible rather than decisive. Under legal role renaming this entails the complete atom predicate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A surprising or anomalous observation requires explanation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Its mandatory invariant requires one evidential trace or criterion to admit multiple distinct answers, which entails non-unique hidden generators for that trace. Under legal role renaming this entails the complete atom predicate.", "role_mapping": "Mandatory underspecification roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: Several hidden states or causes could have produced the same trace.", "slug": "underspecification", "tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b001_a01_ae_a2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The relevant source of the observation is not directly visible, so the reasoner must infer backward from signs. In this condition set, the requirement is: Several hidden states or causes could have produced the same trace.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Several hidden states or causes could have produced the same trace."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER", "name": "Underspecification", "one_liner": "A selection process treats evidence as if it picked out a single answer when many distinct answers fit it equally well, so a hidden closure silently chooses one representative and the behavior that distinguishes them is left uncontrolled.", "page_ref": "prime:underspecification", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Mandatory underspecification roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: Several hidden states or causes could have produced the same trace.", "slug": "underspecification", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Its mandatory invariant requires one evidential trace or criterion to admit multiple distinct answers, which entails non-unique hidden generators for that trace. Under legal role renaming this entails the complete atom predicate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Several hidden states or causes could have produced the same trace.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A provisional working hypothesis is needed before exhaustive verification is possible.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The explanation is needed to guide next inquiry, triage, diagnosis, model debugging, or immediate action. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: A provisional working hypothesis is needed before exhaustive verification is possible. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A provisional working hypothesis is needed before exhaustive verification is possible.", "The explanation is needed to guide next inquiry, triage, diagnosis, model debugging, or immediate action."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "A provisional working hypothesis is needed before exhaustive verification is possible."}, {"display_text": "Evidence is suggestive rather than decisive.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Available information supports differential plausibility but does not deductively entail the conclusion. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Evidence is suggestive rather than decisive. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Evidence is suggestive rather than decisive.", "Available information supports differential plausibility but does not deductively entail the conclusion."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Evidence is suggestive rather than decisive."}, {"display_text": "The cost of premature closure and the cost of endless ambiguity are both material.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The pattern is strongest when the process must choose a working explanation without pretending certainty. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: The cost of premature closure and the cost of endless ambiguity are both material. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The cost of premature closure and the cost of endless ambiguity are both material.", "The pattern is strongest when the process must choose a working explanation without pretending certainty."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The cost of premature closure and the cost of endless ambiguity are both material."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 1, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-backfill-batch-001", "ledger_sha256": "bded1ab45ccd00c90751f1a860c698f68a44daf3ba85ea9f8f0c46a396d680e4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Absolute Acquisition–Incremental Tracking", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:absolute_acquisition_incremental_tracking", "slug": "absolute_acquisition_incremental_tracking"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 1 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 1}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Absolute and incremental measurement have complementary weaknesses. Paying for full\nabsolute resolution everywhere is costly; relying on increments alone makes state\nambiguous after startup, interruption, slip, or missed observations.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Incremental observations provide precise local change but cannot establish or reliably recover unambiguous absolute state after startup, interruption, slip, or missed observations."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "This branch preserves the complete remedy-free diagnostic route; goals, feasibility clauses, gates, deployment constraints, and supporting context remain outside the DNF."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "EXT001-C001", "dnf": [["EXT001-U001-O1"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"obligation_id": "EXT001-U001-O1", "predicate": "Incremental observations alone leave absolute state ambiguous after startup, interruption, slip, or missed observations."}], "predicate": "Incremental observations alone leave absolute state ambiguous after startup, interruption, slip, or missed observations.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Incremental observations alone leave absolute state ambiguous after startup, interruption, slip, or missed observations.", "unit_id": "EXT001-U001"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"catalog_exhaustion": "CONDITION_LEVEL", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Incremental observations alone leave absolute state ambiguous after startup, interruption, slip, or missed observations.", "slug": "continuity_vs_rupture"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Incremental observations alone leave absolute state ambiguous after startup, interruption, slip, or missed observations.", "slug": "configuration_drift"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Incremental observations alone leave absolute state ambiguous after startup, interruption, slip, or missed observations.", "slug": "object_permanence"}], "residual_id": "EXT001:absolute_acquisition_incremental_tracking:C01", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding."}}, "condition_id": "ext001_absolute_acquisition_incremental_tracking_a01", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: Incremental observations alone leave absolute state ambiguous after startup, interruption, slip, or missed observations.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Incremental observations alone leave absolute state ambiguous after startup, interruption, slip, or missed observations."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Incremental observations alone leave absolute state ambiguous after startup, interruption, slip, or missed observations.", "slug": "continuity_vs_rupture"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Incremental observations alone leave absolute state ambiguous after startup, interruption, slip, or missed observations.", "slug": "configuration_drift"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Incremental observations alone leave absolute state ambiguous after startup, interruption, slip, or missed observations.", "slug": "object_permanence"}], "normalized_requirement": "Incremental observations alone leave absolute state ambiguous after startup, interruption, slip, or missed observations.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Incremental observations alone leave absolute state ambiguous after startup, interruption, slip, or missed observations.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Continuous high-resolution absolute measurement is materially costly, wide, or fragile.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: Continuous high-resolution absolute measurement is materially costly, wide, or fragile. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Continuous high-resolution absolute measurement is materially costly, wide, or fragile.", "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "Continuous high-resolution absolute measurement is materially costly, wide, or fragile."}, {"display_text": "An absolute observation and an incremental channel can be registered and reconciled.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: An absolute observation and an incremental channel can be registered and reconciled. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["An absolute observation and an incremental channel can be registered and reconciled.", "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "An absolute observation and an incremental channel can be registered and reconciled."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"candidate_ledger_sha256": "96f72d2139077fd57bf795048ebef33b3fd574b20963170080ec916b5b3b92fe", "extension_id": "new-archetypes-extension-001", "ledger_id": "prime-production-v1.2-extension-001", "ledger_sha256": "9644520614744632d1d36da44b1acd77ce432852c6083eb871203521c166efce"}, "base_projection_sha256": "841e0c7f3cb8e8054475ad29a8a14745a416b4fc115559a44878b94292e673ec", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "ca09ed9fe1598ce7072755b530de5553f5ee0a7cd64ae82d9e4a4e2149a37788", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Absorptive Capacity Building", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:absorptive_capacity_building", "slug": "absorptive_capacity_building"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 3, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 4 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 3 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is an outside-to-inside transfer gap. The system is not necessarily ignorant; it lacks the pathway that connects external knowledge to local use. Knowledge may fail at several points: no one scans for it, no one recognizes its relevance, no one understands its assumptions, no one can translate it into local practice, no one has time to try it, or no one learns from the attempted application.\n\nThis is why generic training is insufficient. Training can deliver information, but the deeper problem is whether the system has the source map, recognition criteria, translation capacity, assimilation routine, application pathway, and feedback loop needed to convert information into capability.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Diagnose failure to recognize, assimilate, and apply useful knowledge available beyond the current unit."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any listed literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "The reconciled route preserves the final-method diagnostic relation while excluding goals, feasibility conditions, and application constraints."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Its mandatory definition requires valuable knowledge external to the receiving unit as the object to be recognized, assimilated, and applied. Under legal role renaming this entails the complete atom predicate.", "role_mapping": "Mandatory absorptive capacity roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: Useful knowledge exists outside the current unit.", "slug": "absorptive_capacity", "tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b001_a02_ab_a1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when valuable knowledge exists outside the focal system but is not becoming useful inside it. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Useful knowledge exists outside the current unit.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Useful knowledge exists outside the current unit", "Use this archetype when valuable knowledge exists outside the focal system but is not becoming useful inside it."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER", "name": "Absorptive Capacity", "one_liner": "Ability to integrate knowledge.", "page_ref": "prime:absorptive_capacity", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Mandatory absorptive capacity roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: Useful knowledge exists outside the current unit.", "slug": "absorptive_capacity", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Its mandatory definition requires valuable knowledge external to the receiving unit as the object to be recognized, assimilated, and applied. Under legal role renaming this entails the complete atom predicate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Useful knowledge exists outside the current unit.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "This candidate does not universally preserve the atom complete with its polarity, scope, modality, and qualifiers.", "slug": "culture_lag"}], "residual_id": "r:absorptive_capacity_building:b001_a02_ab_a2", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "The frozen shortlist does not universally entail this complete predicate under a legal role mapping, so the open-world remainder is preserved explicitly."}}, "condition_id": "b001_a02_ab_a2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Repeated reinvention or avoidable lag behind peers. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Repeated reinvention or avoidable lag behind peers"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "This candidate does not universally preserve the atom complete with its polarity, scope, modality, and qualifiers.", "slug": "culture_lag"}], "normalized_requirement": "The unit repeatedly reinvents work or avoidably lags peers.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "The frozen shortlist does not universally entail this complete predicate under a legal role mapping, so the open-world remainder is preserved explicitly. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The unit repeatedly reinvents work or avoidably lags peers.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any listed literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "The reconciled route preserves the final-method diagnostic relation while excluding goals, feasibility conditions, and application constraints."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Its mandatory definition requires valuable knowledge external to the receiving unit as the object to be recognized, assimilated, and applied. Under legal role renaming this entails the complete atom predicate.", "role_mapping": "Mandatory absorptive capacity roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: Useful knowledge exists outside the current unit.", "slug": "absorptive_capacity", "tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b001_a02_ab_a1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when valuable knowledge exists outside the focal system but is not becoming useful inside it. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Useful knowledge exists outside the current unit.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Useful knowledge exists outside the current unit", "Use this archetype when valuable knowledge exists outside the focal system but is not becoming useful inside it."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER", "name": "Absorptive Capacity", "one_liner": "Ability to integrate knowledge.", "page_ref": "prime:absorptive_capacity", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Mandatory absorptive capacity roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: Useful knowledge exists outside the current unit.", "slug": "absorptive_capacity", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Its mandatory definition requires valuable knowledge external to the receiving unit as the object to be recognized, assimilated, and applied. Under legal role renaming this entails the complete atom predicate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Useful knowledge exists outside the current unit.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "This candidate does not universally preserve the atom complete with its polarity, scope, modality, and qualifiers.", "slug": "constructivist_learning"}], "residual_id": "r:absorptive_capacity_building:b001_a02_ab_a3", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "The frozen shortlist does not universally entail this complete predicate under a legal role mapping, so the open-world remainder is preserved explicitly."}}, "condition_id": "b001_a02_ab_a3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Training, reports, or conferences do not change behavior. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Training, reports, or conferences do not change behavior"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "This candidate does not universally preserve the atom complete with its polarity, scope, modality, and qualifiers.", "slug": "constructivist_learning"}], "normalized_requirement": "Training, reports, or conferences fail to change behavior.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "The frozen shortlist does not universally entail this complete predicate under a legal role mapping, so the open-world remainder is preserved explicitly. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Training, reports, or conferences fail to change behavior.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any listed literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "The reconciled route preserves the final-method diagnostic relation while excluding goals, feasibility conditions, and application constraints."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Its mandatory definition requires valuable knowledge external to the receiving unit as the object to be recognized, assimilated, and applied. Under legal role renaming this entails the complete atom predicate.", "role_mapping": "Mandatory absorptive capacity roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: Useful knowledge exists outside the current unit.", "slug": "absorptive_capacity", "tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b001_a02_ab_a1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when valuable knowledge exists outside the focal system but is not becoming useful inside it. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Useful knowledge exists outside the current unit.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Useful knowledge exists outside the current unit", "Use this archetype when valuable knowledge exists outside the focal system but is not becoming useful inside it."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER", "name": "Absorptive Capacity", "one_liner": "Ability to integrate knowledge.", "page_ref": "prime:absorptive_capacity", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Mandatory absorptive capacity roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: Useful knowledge exists outside the current unit.", "slug": "absorptive_capacity", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Its mandatory definition requires valuable knowledge external to the receiving unit as the object to be recognized, assimilated, and applied. Under legal role renaming this entails the complete atom predicate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Useful knowledge exists outside the current unit.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "This candidate does not universally preserve the atom complete with its polarity, scope, modality, and qualifiers.", "slug": "absorptive_capacity"}], "residual_id": "r:absorptive_capacity_building:b001_a02_ab_a4", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "The frozen shortlist does not universally entail this complete predicate under a legal role mapping, so the open-world remainder is preserved explicitly."}}, "condition_id": "b001_a02_ab_a4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: External expertise is rejected as irrelevant or adopted uncritically. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["External expertise is rejected as irrelevant or adopted uncritically"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "This candidate does not universally preserve the atom complete with its polarity, scope, modality, and qualifiers.", "slug": "absorptive_capacity"}], "normalized_requirement": "External expertise is rejected as irrelevant or adopted uncritically.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "The frozen shortlist does not universally entail this complete predicate under a legal role mapping, so the open-world remainder is preserved explicitly. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "External expertise is rejected as irrelevant or adopted uncritically.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Innovation depends on combining internal capability with outside knowledge.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Outside knowledge is valuable because it differs from local practice, but that same difference makes it. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: Innovation depends on combining internal capability with outside knowledge. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Innovation depends on combining internal capability with outside knowledge", "Outside knowledge is valuable because it differs from local practice, but that same difference makes it"]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Innovation depends on combining internal capability with outside knowledge"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 1, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-backfill-batch-001", "ledger_sha256": "bded1ab45ccd00c90751f1a860c698f68a44daf3ba85ea9f8f0c46a396d680e4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Abstraction–Substrate Traceability Guardrail", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:abstraction_substrate_traceability_guardrail", "slug": "abstraction_substrate_traceability_guardrail"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 4, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 4 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "An abstraction created to summarize, classify, predict, proxy, or coordinate an underlying substrate becomes the object of attention and authority. Users optimize, govern, judge, or communicate through the abstraction as if it were the substrate itself, while the trail back to evidence, context, transformation, scope, and loss becomes stale, hidden, or socially irrelevant.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Diagnose action-guiding abstraction drift, substitution for substrate, and loss of representational traceability."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any listed literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "The reconciled route preserves the final-method diagnostic relation while excluding goals, feasibility conditions, and application constraints."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "This candidate does not universally preserve the atom complete with its polarity, scope, modality, and qualifiers.", "slug": "reification"}], "residual_id": "r:abstraction_substrate_traceability_guardrail:b001_a03_at_a2", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "The frozen shortlist does not universally entail this complete predicate under a legal role mapping, so the open-world remainder is preserved explicitly."}}, "condition_id": "b001_a03_at_a2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The abstraction gains decision power. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The abstraction gains decision power"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "This candidate does not universally preserve the atom complete with its polarity, scope, modality, and qualifiers.", "slug": "reification"}], "normalized_requirement": "The abstraction has gained decision power.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "The frozen shortlist does not universally entail this complete predicate under a legal role mapping, so the open-world remainder is preserved explicitly. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The abstraction has gained decision power.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Reification can retain a weakened but still visible substrate trace; it does not universally entail that downstream users cannot see the substrate.", "slug": "reification"}], "residual_id": "r:abstraction_substrate_traceability_guardrail:b001_a03_at_a3", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "The frozen shortlist does not universally entail this complete predicate under a legal role mapping, so the open-world remainder is preserved explicitly."}}, "condition_id": "b001_a03_at_a3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Downstream users cannot see the substrate. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Downstream users cannot see the substrate"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Reification can retain a weakened but still visible substrate trace; it does not universally entail that downstream users cannot see the substrate.", "slug": "reification"}], "normalized_requirement": "Downstream users cannot see the represented substrate.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "The frozen shortlist does not universally entail this complete predicate under a legal role mapping, so the open-world remainder is preserved explicitly. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Downstream users cannot see the represented substrate.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any listed literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "The reconciled route preserves the final-method diagnostic relation while excluding goals, feasibility conditions, and application constraints."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "This candidate does not universally preserve the atom complete with its polarity, scope, modality, and qualifiers.", "slug": "reification"}], "residual_id": "r:abstraction_substrate_traceability_guardrail:b001_a03_at_a2", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "The frozen shortlist does not universally entail this complete predicate under a legal role mapping, so the open-world remainder is preserved explicitly."}}, "condition_id": "b001_a03_at_a2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The abstraction gains decision power. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The abstraction gains decision power"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "This candidate does not universally preserve the atom complete with its polarity, scope, modality, and qualifiers.", "slug": "reification"}], "normalized_requirement": "The abstraction has gained decision power.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "The frozen shortlist does not universally entail this complete predicate under a legal role mapping, so the open-world remainder is preserved explicitly. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The abstraction has gained decision power.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "This candidate does not universally preserve the atom complete with its polarity, scope, modality, and qualifiers.", "slug": "reification"}], "residual_id": "r:abstraction_substrate_traceability_guardrail:b001_a03_at_a4", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "The frozen shortlist does not universally entail this complete predicate under a legal role mapping, so the open-world remainder is preserved explicitly."}}, "condition_id": "b001_a03_at_a4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Language drops the representational qualifier. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Language drops the representational qualifier"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "This candidate does not universally preserve the atom complete with its polarity, scope, modality, and qualifiers.", "slug": "reification"}], "normalized_requirement": "Language drops the qualifier that marks a claim as representational.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "The frozen shortlist does not universally entail this complete predicate under a legal role mapping, so the open-world remainder is preserved explicitly. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Language drops the qualifier that marks a claim as representational.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any listed literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "The reconciled route preserves the final-method diagnostic relation while excluding goals, feasibility conditions, and application constraints."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "This candidate does not universally preserve the atom complete with its polarity, scope, modality, and qualifiers.", "slug": "reification"}], "residual_id": "r:abstraction_substrate_traceability_guardrail:b001_a03_at_a2", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "The frozen shortlist does not universally entail this complete predicate under a legal role mapping, so the open-world remainder is preserved explicitly."}}, "condition_id": "b001_a03_at_a2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The abstraction gains decision power. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The abstraction gains decision power"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "This candidate does not universally preserve the atom complete with its polarity, scope, modality, and qualifiers.", "slug": "reification"}], "normalized_requirement": "The abstraction has gained decision power.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "The frozen shortlist does not universally entail this complete predicate under a legal role mapping, so the open-world remainder is preserved explicitly. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The abstraction has gained decision power.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The frozen retrieval audit establishes that a maintained abstraction or record which changes more slowly than its substrate necessarily diverges from current reality.", "role_mapping": "Record or abstraction -> governing abstraction; represented reality -> changing substrate.", "slug": "record_reality_divergence", "tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b001_a03_at_a5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Abstraction is necessary for action at scale, but every abstraction trades substrate detail for usability. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The substrate changes faster than the abstraction.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The substrate changes faster than the abstraction", "Abstraction is necessary for action at scale, but every abstraction trades substrate detail for usability."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER", "name": "Record-Reality Divergence", "one_liner": "An authoritative record of an external state drifts from the reality it describes while remaining the basis for downstream decisions.", "page_ref": "prime:record_reality_divergence", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Record or abstraction -> governing abstraction; represented reality -> changing substrate.", "slug": "record_reality_divergence", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The frozen retrieval audit establishes that a maintained abstraction or record which changes more slowly than its substrate necessarily diverges from current reality."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The substrate changes faster than the abstraction.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any listed literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "The reconciled route preserves the final-method diagnostic relation while excluding goals, feasibility conditions, and application constraints."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "This candidate does not universally preserve the atom complete with its polarity, scope, modality, and qualifiers.", "slug": "reification"}], "residual_id": "r:abstraction_substrate_traceability_guardrail:b001_a03_at_a2", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "The frozen shortlist does not universally entail this complete predicate under a legal role mapping, so the open-world remainder is preserved explicitly."}}, "condition_id": "b001_a03_at_a2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The abstraction gains decision power. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The abstraction gains decision power"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "This candidate does not universally preserve the atom complete with its polarity, scope, modality, and qualifiers.", "slug": "reification"}], "normalized_requirement": "The abstraction has gained decision power.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "The frozen shortlist does not universally entail this complete predicate under a legal role mapping, so the open-world remainder is preserved explicitly. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The abstraction has gained decision power.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The frozen retrieval audit establishes the targeted-proxy wedge: incentives reward manipulation of the governing abstraction rather than improvement of its substrate.", "role_mapping": "Rewarded proxy -> abstraction; underlying construct -> substrate.", "slug": "goodharts_law", "tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b001_a03_at_a6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Incentives reward manipulating the abstraction. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Incentives reward manipulating the abstraction"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER", "name": "Goodhart's Law", "one_liner": "When a proxy is placed under binding optimization pressure, its correlation with the construct it was meant to indicate collapses.", "page_ref": "prime:goodharts_law", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Rewarded proxy -> abstraction; underlying construct -> substrate.", "slug": "goodharts_law", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The frozen retrieval audit establishes the targeted-proxy wedge: incentives reward manipulation of the governing abstraction rather than improvement of its substrate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Incentives reward manipulating the abstraction.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Compression becomes routine infrastructure.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Compression becomes routine infrastructure. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Compression becomes routine infrastructure"]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "Compression becomes routine infrastructure"}, {"display_text": "The abstraction crosses domains.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The abstraction crosses domains. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The abstraction crosses domains"]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "The abstraction crosses domains"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 1, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-backfill-batch-001", "ledger_sha256": "bded1ab45ccd00c90751f1a860c698f68a44daf3ba85ea9f8f0c46a396d680e4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Acceptable Substitution Mapping", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:acceptable_substitution_mapping", "slug": "acceptable_substitution_mapping"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 2, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 2 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 2 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 2}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is unclear substitutability. A system wants flexibility, but the boundaries of acceptable replacement are undefined. One actor may see two alternatives as equivalent because both meet a visible criterion; another actor may see them as very different because one preserves trust, accessibility, compatibility, or safety and the other does not.\n\nThis problem often appears as repeated substitution disputes, informal exceptions, confusing procurement approvals, service downgrades disguised as equivalence, one-dimensional scoring, or stakeholder dissatisfaction after a supposedly equivalent change.\n\nThe root tension is that flexibility is valuable only if the preserved outcome remains intact. A substitution map prevents the system from confusing \"different but acceptable\" with \"different in a way that breaks the purpose.\"", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Diagnose contested or harmful substitution while separating the decision need from evidence of false equivalence."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any listed literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "The reconciled route preserves the final-method diagnostic relation while excluding goals, feasibility conditions, and application constraints."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "This candidate does not universally preserve the atom complete with its polarity, scope, modality, and qualifiers.", "slug": "fungibility"}], "residual_id": "r:acceptable_substitution_mapping:b001_a04_as_a4", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "The frozen shortlist does not universally entail this complete predicate under a legal role mapping, so the open-world remainder is preserved explicitly."}}, "condition_id": "b001_a04_as_a4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Stakeholders disagree about whether one bundle is really equivalent to another. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders disagree about whether one bundle is really equivalent to another."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "This candidate does not universally preserve the atom complete with its polarity, scope, modality, and qualifiers.", "slug": "fungibility"}], "normalized_requirement": "Stakeholders disagree whether one bundle is equivalent to another.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "The frozen shortlist does not universally entail this complete predicate under a legal role mapping, so the open-world remainder is preserved explicitly. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Stakeholders disagree whether one bundle is equivalent to another.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any listed literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "The reconciled route preserves the final-method diagnostic relation while excluding goals, feasibility conditions, and application constraints."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "This candidate does not universally preserve the atom complete with its polarity, scope, modality, and qualifiers.", "slug": "substitutability"}], "residual_id": "r:acceptable_substitution_mapping:b001_a04_as_a6", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "The frozen shortlist does not universally entail this complete predicate under a legal role mapping, so the open-world remainder is preserved explicitly."}}, "condition_id": "b001_a04_as_a6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Prior substitutions have caused quality loss, access problems, user dissatisfaction, safety incidents, compatibility failures, or fairness concerns. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Prior substitutions have caused quality loss, access problems, user dissatisfaction, safety incidents, compatibility failures, or fairness concerns."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "This candidate does not universally preserve the atom complete with its polarity, scope, modality, and qualifiers.", "slug": "substitutability"}], "normalized_requirement": "Prior substitutions caused quality, access, satisfaction, safety, compatibility, or fairness harm.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "The frozen shortlist does not universally entail this complete predicate under a legal role mapping, so the open-world remainder is preserved explicitly. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Prior substitutions caused quality, access, satisfaction, safety, compatibility, or fairness harm.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "DISJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Several options differ across multiple attributes, but decision-makers need to choose or authorize substitutes.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: Several options differ across multiple attributes, but decision-makers need to choose or authorize substitutes. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Several options differ across multiple attributes, but decision-makers need to choose or authorize substitutes."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "Several options differ across multiple attributes, but decision-makers need to choose or authorize substitutes."}, {"display_text": "A preferred resource, supplier, pathway, role, or design is unavailable, too costly, too slow, or not suitable for all users.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system has multiple possible bundles, resources, service forms, designs, or pathways that might satisfy a goal, but the boundary between acceptable substitution and harmful false equivalence is unclear. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: A preferred resource, supplier, pathway, role, or design is unavailable, too costly, too slow, or not suitable for all users. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A preferred resource, supplier, pathway, role, or design is unavailable, too costly, too slow, or not suitable for all users.", "A system has multiple possible bundles, resources, service forms, designs, or pathways that might satisfy a goal, but the boundary between acceptable substitution and harmful false equivalence is unclear."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "A preferred resource, supplier, pathway, role, or design is unavailable, too costly, too slow, or not suitable for all users."}, {"display_text": "A shortage, budget constraint, customization need, or redesign pressure forces substitution rather than simple selection of the ideal option.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful under scarcity, procurement delays, customization pressure, staffing shortages, service redesign, or multi-attribute design choices. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: A shortage, budget constraint, customization need, or redesign pressure forces substitution rather than simple selection of the ideal option. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A shortage, budget constraint, customization need, or redesign pressure forces substitution rather than simple selection of the ideal option.", "It is especially useful under scarcity, procurement delays, customization pressure, staffing shortages, service redesign, or multi-attribute design choices."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "A shortage, budget constraint, customization need, or redesign pressure forces substitution rather than simple selection of the ideal option."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 1, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-backfill-batch-001", "ledger_sha256": "bded1ab45ccd00c90751f1a860c698f68a44daf3ba85ea9f8f0c46a396d680e4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Access-Conditioned Bundle Decoupling", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:access_conditioned_bundle_decoupling", "slug": "access_conditioned_bundle_decoupling"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A party that controls a scarce, required, or highly valued access path uses that control to attach additional terms the affected party would not freely choose if the desired item were available separately. The coupled package makes acceptance ambiguous: observed agreement may reflect preference for the desired item, dependency on the access path, lack of substitutes, switching costs, fear of exclusion, or inability to negotiate rather than genuine acceptance of the added condition.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Diagnose leverage-by-coupling in access decisions and distinguish the unwanted bundle from feasibility and necessity gates."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any listed literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "The reconciled route preserves the final-method diagnostic relation while excluding goals, feasibility conditions, and application constraints."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "This candidate does not universally preserve the atom complete with its polarity, scope, modality, and qualifiers.", "slug": "gatekeeping"}], "residual_id": "r:access_conditioned_bundle_decoupling:b001_a05_bd_a1", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "The frozen shortlist does not universally entail this complete predicate under a legal role mapping, so the open-world remainder is preserved explicitly."}}, "condition_id": "b001_a05_bd_a1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: One actor or institution controls a desired access path, scarce resource, platform, credential, contract, service, channel, benefit, or gateway. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["One actor or institution controls a desired access path, scarce resource, platform, credential, contract, service, channel, benefit, or gateway."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "This candidate does not universally preserve the atom complete with its polarity, scope, modality, and qualifiers.", "slug": "gatekeeping"}], "normalized_requirement": "A controller holds a desired access path or scarce gateway.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "The frozen shortlist does not universally entail this complete predicate under a legal role mapping, so the open-world remainder is preserved explicitly. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A controller holds a desired access path or scarce gateway.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Its mandatory structure includes controller-held desired access, a coupled extra item, a weak outside option, foreclosed partial acceptance, and leverage gain. Under legal role renaming this entails the complete atom predicate.", "role_mapping": "Mandatory conditional access roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: Desired access is paired with an additional condition, add-on, permission, restriction, commitment, or collateral obligation.", "slug": "conditional_access", "tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b001_a05_bd_a2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The access is paired with an additional condition, add-on, waiver, product, permission, data use, duty, restriction, relationship commitment, or collateral obligation. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The access is paired with an additional condition, add-on, waiver, product, permission, data use, duty, restriction, relationship commitment, or collateral obligation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER", "name": "Conditional Access", "one_liner": "A controller couples a desired item with an undesired one, leveraging access asymmetry to force acceptance of both.", "page_ref": "prime:conditional_access", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Mandatory conditional access roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: Desired access is paired with an additional condition, add-on, permission, restriction, commitment, or collateral obligation.", "slug": "conditional_access", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Its mandatory structure includes controller-held desired access, a coupled extra item, a weak outside option, foreclosed partial acceptance, and leverage gain. Under legal role renaming this entails the complete atom predicate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Desired access is paired with an additional condition, add-on, permission, restriction, commitment, or collateral obligation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [], "residual_id": "r:access_conditioned_bundle_decoupling:b001_a05_bd_a3", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "The final-method reconciliation, complete condition shortlist disposition, and bounded packet-pool scan found no qualifying prime."}}, "condition_id": "b001_a05_bd_a3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The added condition is not obviously necessary for safety, compatibility, performance, legal compliance, or core delivery of the desired access. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The added condition is not obviously necessary for safety, compatibility, performance, legal compliance, or core delivery of the desired access."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The added condition is not obviously necessary for safety, compatibility, performance, legal compliance, or core delivery.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "The final-method reconciliation, complete condition shortlist disposition, and bounded packet-pool scan found no qualifying prime. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The added condition is not obviously necessary for safety, compatibility, performance, legal compliance, or core delivery.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Its mandatory structure includes controller-held desired access, a coupled extra item, a weak outside option, foreclosed partial acceptance, and leverage gain. Under legal role renaming this entails the complete atom predicate.", "role_mapping": "Mandatory conditional access roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: The affected party has limited substitutes, high switching costs, deadline pressure, relationship-specific investment, or dependency on continued access.", "slug": "conditional_access", "tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b001_a05_bd_a4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The coupled package makes acceptance ambiguous: observed agreement may reflect preference for the desired item, dependency on the access path, lack of substitutes, switching costs, fear of exclusion, or inability to negotiate rather than genuine acceptance of the added condition. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The affected party has limited substitutes, high switching costs, deadline pressure, relationship-specific investment, or dependency on continued access.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The affected party has limited substitutes, high switching costs, deadline pressure, relationship-specific investment, or dependency on continued access.", "The coupled package makes acceptance ambiguous: observed agreement may reflect preference for the desired item, dependency on the access path, lack of substitutes, switching costs, fear of exclusion, or inability to negotiate rather than genuine acceptance of the added condition."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER", "name": "Conditional Access", "one_liner": "A controller couples a desired item with an undesired one, leveraging access asymmetry to force acceptance of both.", "page_ref": "prime:conditional_access", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Mandatory conditional access roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: The affected party has limited substitutes, high switching costs, deadline pressure, relationship-specific investment, or dependency on continued access.", "slug": "conditional_access", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Its mandatory structure includes controller-held desired access, a coupled extra item, a weak outside option, foreclosed partial acceptance, and leverage gain. Under legal role renaming this entails the complete atom predicate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The affected party has limited substitutes, high switching costs, deadline pressure, relationship-specific investment, or dependency on continued access.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Acceptance is recorded as consent, purchase, agreement, revealed preference, or participation even though refusal would mean losing the desired access.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The coupled package makes acceptance ambiguous: observed agreement may reflect preference for the desired item, dependency on the access path, lack of substitutes, switching costs, fear of exclusion, or inability to negotiate rather than genuine acceptance of the added condition. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Acceptance is recorded as consent, purchase, agreement, revealed preference, or participation even though refusal would mean losing the desired access. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Acceptance is recorded as consent, purchase, agreement, revealed preference, or participation even though refusal would mean losing the desired access.", "The coupled package makes acceptance ambiguous: observed agreement may reflect preference for the desired item, dependency on the access path, lack of substitutes, switching costs, fear of exclusion, or inability to negotiate rather than genuine acceptance of the added condition."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Acceptance is recorded as consent, purchase, agreement, revealed preference, or participation even though refusal would mean losing the desired access."}, {"display_text": "The controller benefits from the attached condition in a way that is not transparently priced, compensated, or separately negotiable.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A party that controls a scarce, required, or highly valued access path uses that control to attach additional terms the affected party would not freely choose if the desired item were available separately. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The controller benefits from the attached condition in a way that is not transparently priced, compensated, or separately negotiable. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The controller benefits from the attached condition in a way that is not transparently priced, compensated, or separately negotiable.", "A party that controls a scarce, required, or highly valued access path uses that control to attach additional terms the affected party would not freely choose if the desired item were available separately."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The controller benefits from the attached condition in a way that is not transparently priced, compensated, or separately negotiable."}, {"display_text": "Affected parties cannot easily identify which terms are mandatory, which are optional, and which are bundled by convenience or leverage.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A party that controls a scarce, required, or highly valued access path uses that control to attach additional terms the affected party would not freely choose if the desired item were available separately. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Affected parties cannot easily identify which terms are mandatory, which are optional, and which are bundled by convenience or leverage. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Affected parties cannot easily identify which terms are mandatory, which are optional, and which are bundled by convenience or leverage.", "A party that controls a scarce, required, or highly valued access path uses that control to attach additional terms the affected party would not freely choose if the desired item were available separately."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "Affected parties cannot easily identify which terms are mandatory, which are optional, and which are bundled by convenience or leverage."}, {"display_text": "Separate pricing, separate consent, opt-out, fallback access, appeal, or review would be technically possible but is absent, hidden, or punitive.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Separate pricing, separate consent, opt-out, fallback access, appeal, or review would be technically possible but is absent, hidden, or punitive. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Separate pricing, separate consent, opt-out, fallback access, appeal, or review would be technically possible but is absent, hidden, or punitive."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 8, "text": "Separate pricing, separate consent, opt-out, fallback access, appeal, or review would be technically possible but is absent, hidden, or punitive."}, {"display_text": "The bundle is justified by broad claims of efficiency, security, quality, or standardization without a specific necessity test.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The bundle is justified by broad claims of efficiency, security, quality, or standardization without a specific necessity test. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [9], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The bundle is justified by broad claims of efficiency, security, quality, or standardization without a specific necessity test."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 9, "text": "The bundle is justified by broad claims of efficiency, security, quality, or standardization without a specific necessity test."}, {"display_text": "Downstream harm appears as coerced data sharing, unwanted purchases, bundled waivers, lock-in, exclusion, distorted market signals, or suppressed alternatives.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Downstream harm appears as coerced data sharing, unwanted purchases, bundled waivers, lock-in, exclusion, distorted market signals, or suppressed alternatives. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [10], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Downstream harm appears as coerced data sharing, unwanted purchases, bundled waivers, lock-in, exclusion, distorted market signals, or suppressed alternatives."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 10, "text": "Downstream harm appears as coerced data sharing, unwanted purchases, bundled waivers, lock-in, exclusion, distorted market signals, or suppressed alternatives."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 1, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-backfill-batch-001", "ledger_sha256": "bded1ab45ccd00c90751f1a860c698f68a44daf3ba85ea9f8f0c46a396d680e4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Access-Optimized Redundant Representation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:access_optimized_redundant_representation", "slug": "access_optimized_redundant_representation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 3, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 3 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The canonical representation preserves update simplicity, semantic unity, or normalization, but the dominant access paths repeatedly pay excessive joins, traversal, aggregation, network fan-out, transformation, or reconstruction cost. Teams either accept poor tail latency and fragile cross-boundary reads or create ad hoc copies that lack authority, lineage, freshness semantics, deletion propagation, repair, schema migration, and retirement controls. The resulting system has neither efficient access nor trustworthy correspondence.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Diagnose read-shape and access-path mismatch or ungoverned projections while keeping economic and implementation gates outside the trigger."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any listed literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "The reconciled route preserves the final-method diagnostic relation while excluding goals, feasibility conditions, and application constraints."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "This candidate does not universally preserve the atom complete with its polarity, scope, modality, and qualifiers.", "slug": "representational_structure_mismatch"}], "residual_id": "r:access_optimized_redundant_representation:b001_a06_rr_a3", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "The frozen shortlist does not universally entail this complete predicate under a legal role mapping, so the open-world remainder is preserved explicitly."}}, "condition_id": "b001_a06_rr_a3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The canonical model is structurally correct for writes or ownership but materially mismatched to read shape. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The canonical model is structurally correct for writes or ownership but materially mismatched to read shape."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "This candidate does not universally preserve the atom complete with its polarity, scope, modality, and qualifiers.", "slug": "representational_structure_mismatch"}], "normalized_requirement": "The canonical model is correct for writes or ownership but materially mismatched to read shape.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "The frozen shortlist does not universally entail this complete predicate under a legal role mapping, so the open-world remainder is preserved explicitly. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The canonical model is correct for writes or ownership but materially mismatched to read shape.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any listed literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "The reconciled route preserves the final-method diagnostic relation while excluding goals, feasibility conditions, and application constraints."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "This candidate does not universally preserve the atom complete with its polarity, scope, modality, and qualifiers.", "slug": "scalability"}], "residual_id": "r:access_optimized_redundant_representation:b001_a06_rr_a4", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "The frozen shortlist does not universally entail this complete predicate under a legal role mapping, so the open-world remainder is preserved explicitly."}}, "condition_id": "b001_a06_rr_a4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The canonical representation preserves update simplicity, semantic unity, or normalization, but the dominant access paths repeatedly pay excessive joins, traversal, aggregation, network fan-out, transformation, or reconstruction cost. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Cross-service fan-out, remote joins, repeated aggregation, or graph traversal dominates latency or reliability.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Cross-service fan-out, remote joins, repeated aggregation, or graph traversal dominates latency or reliability.", "The canonical representation preserves update simplicity, semantic unity, or normalization, but the dominant access paths repeatedly pay excessive joins, traversal, aggregation, network fan-out, transformation, or reconstruction cost."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "This candidate does not universally preserve the atom complete with its polarity, scope, modality, and qualifiers.", "slug": "scalability"}], "normalized_requirement": "Cross-service fan-out, remote joins, repeated aggregation, or graph traversal dominates latency or reliability.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "The frozen shortlist does not universally entail this complete predicate under a legal role mapping, so the open-world remainder is preserved explicitly. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Cross-service fan-out, remote joins, repeated aggregation, or graph traversal dominates latency or reliability.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any listed literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "The reconciled route preserves the final-method diagnostic relation while excluding goals, feasibility conditions, and application constraints."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "This candidate does not universally preserve the atom complete with its polarity, scope, modality, and qualifiers.", "slug": "consistency_model"}], "residual_id": "r:access_optimized_redundant_representation:b001_a06_rr_a9", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "The frozen shortlist does not universally entail this complete predicate under a legal role mapping, so the open-world remainder is preserved explicitly."}}, "condition_id": "b001_a06_rr_a9", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A team is already copying fields or building projections but cannot state their source, lag, update rule, or retirement condition. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A team is already copying fields or building projections but cannot state their source, lag, update rule, or retirement condition."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "This candidate does not universally preserve the atom complete with its polarity, scope, modality, and qualifiers.", "slug": "consistency_model"}], "normalized_requirement": "The team cannot state the copies' source, lag, update rule, or retirement condition.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "The frozen shortlist does not universally entail this complete predicate under a legal role mapping, so the open-world remainder is preserved explicitly. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The team cannot state the copies' source, lag, update rule, or retirement condition.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "DISJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A stable, high-value read or retrieval pattern repeatedly composes the same canonical data.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The canonical representation preserves update simplicity, semantic unity, or normalization, but the dominant access paths repeatedly pay excessive joins, traversal, aggregation, network fan-out, transformation, or reconstruction cost. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: A stable, high-value read or retrieval pattern repeatedly composes the same canonical data. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A stable, high-value read or retrieval pattern repeatedly composes the same canonical data.", "The canonical representation preserves update simplicity, semantic unity, or normalization, but the dominant access paths repeatedly pay excessive joins, traversal, aggregation, network fan-out, transformation, or reconstruction cost."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "A stable, high-value read or retrieval pattern repeatedly composes the same canonical data."}, {"display_text": "The access path must work under network, edge, offline, or regional constraints.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The canonical representation preserves update simplicity, semantic unity, or normalization, but the dominant access paths repeatedly pay excessive joins, traversal, aggregation, network fan-out, transformation, or reconstruction cost. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: The access path must work under network, edge, offline, or regional constraints. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The access path must work under network, edge, offline, or regional constraints.", "The canonical representation preserves update simplicity, semantic unity, or normalization, but the dominant access paths repeatedly pay excessive joins, traversal, aggregation, network fan-out, transformation, or reconstruction cost."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The access path must work under network, edge, offline, or regional constraints."}, {"display_text": "The read-to-write ratio and reuse frequency make moving work to propagation or refresh economically plausible.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "One canonical form reduces duplicate truth and update surfaces, while access efficiency often demands locality, precomposition, alternate grain, or copied context; every access-side win transfers cost and risk into synchronization, storage, write amplification, change propagation, privacy, and divergence management. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: The read-to-write ratio and reuse frequency make moving work to propagation or refresh economically plausible. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The read-to-write ratio and reuse frequency make moving work to propagation or refresh economically plausible.", "One canonical form reduces duplicate truth and update surfaces, while access efficiency often demands locality, precomposition, alternate grain, or copied context; every access-side win transfers cost and risk into synchronization, storage, write amplification, change propagation, privacy, and divergence management."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The read-to-write ratio and reuse frequency make moving work to propagation or refresh economically plausible."}, {"display_text": "Consumers need a historical snapshot, query projection, search document, or analytical shape that differs from current canonical state.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: Consumers need a historical snapshot, query projection, search document, or analytical shape that differs from current canonical state. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Consumers need a historical snapshot, query projection, search document, or analytical shape that differs from current canonical state."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Consumers need a historical snapshot, query projection, search document, or analytical shape that differs from current canonical state."}, {"display_text": "A schema or ownership boundary prevents direct access to canonical internals, yet a stable contract can expose a derived representation.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The canonical representation preserves update simplicity, semantic unity, or normalization, but the dominant access paths repeatedly pay excessive joins, traversal, aggregation, network fan-out, transformation, or reconstruction cost. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: A schema or ownership boundary prevents direct access to canonical internals, yet a stable contract can expose a derived representation. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A schema or ownership boundary prevents direct access to canonical internals, yet a stable contract can expose a derived representation.", "The canonical representation preserves update simplicity, semantic unity, or normalization, but the dominant access paths repeatedly pay excessive joins, traversal, aggregation, network fan-out, transformation, or reconstruction cost."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 8, "text": "A schema or ownership boundary prevents direct access to canonical internals, yet a stable contract can expose a derived representation."}, {"display_text": "The consequence of staleness can be bounded, marked, refused, or corrected rather than ignored.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: The consequence of staleness can be bounded, marked, refused, or corrected rather than ignored. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [9], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The consequence of staleness can be bounded, marked, refused, or corrected rather than ignored."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 9, "text": "The consequence of staleness can be bounded, marked, refused, or corrected rather than ignored."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 1, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-backfill-batch-001", "ledger_sha256": "bded1ab45ccd00c90751f1a860c698f68a44daf3ba85ea9f8f0c46a396d680e4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Accountability Chain Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:accountability_chain_design", "slug": "accountability_chain_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 1 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 1}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is responsibility diffusion. A decision gets made, a model is deployed, a policy is enforced, a service fails, or a harm occurs, but accountability disperses across contributors, managers, systems, policies, vendors, committees, or automation. Everyone can point to a partial cause, but no chain connects the outcome to an answerable owner and a path for repair.\n\nThis produces common symptoms: vanished rationales, handoff gaps, unclosed corrective actions, accountability theater, and blame without learning. The deeper tension is that modern systems distribute action, but governance still needs coherent answerability.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Diagnose diffuse responsibility and preserve the contextual links needed to connect an action to answerability and repair."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any listed literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "The reconciled route preserves the final-method diagnostic relation while excluding goals, feasibility conditions, and application constraints."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Its mandatory structure spreads obligation across agents and thereby makes individual ownership and accountability diffuse. Under legal role renaming this entails the complete atom predicate.", "role_mapping": "Mandatory responsibility diffusion roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: Ownership is diffuse.", "slug": "responsibility_diffusion", "tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b001_a07_ak_a1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Diffuse ownership. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Diffuse ownership"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER", "name": "Responsibility Diffusion", "one_liner": "Spreading responsibility reduces individual accountability perception.", "page_ref": "prime:responsibility_diffusion", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Mandatory responsibility diffusion roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: Ownership is diffuse.", "slug": "responsibility_diffusion", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Its mandatory structure spreads obligation across agents and thereby makes individual ownership and accountability diffuse. Under legal role renaming this entails the complete atom predicate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Ownership is diffuse.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Decision or action has consequences.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "An outcome occurs, a decision is made, or an action is taken, but responsibility is unclear, undocumented, fragmented across roles, disconnected from repair, or impossible to inspect after the fact. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Decision or action has consequences. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Decision or action has consequences", "An outcome occurs, a decision is made, or an action is taken, but responsibility is unclear, undocumented, fragmented across roles, disconnected from repair, or impossible to inspect after the fact."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "Decision or action has consequences"}, {"display_text": "Records are needed for later review.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: Records are needed for later review. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Records are needed for later review"]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Records are needed for later review"}, {"display_text": "Repair requires follow-through.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: Repair requires follow-through. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Repair requires follow-through"]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Repair requires follow-through"}, {"display_text": "Authority crosses roles or tiers.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful in organizations, platform governance, AI/data systems, safety work, operations, public programs, and distributed teams where responsibility crosses roles, tools, vendors, or tiers. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Authority crosses roles or tiers. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Authority crosses roles or tiers", "It is especially useful in organizations, platform governance, AI/data systems, safety work, operations, public programs, and distributed teams where responsibility crosses roles, tools, vendors, or tiers."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Authority crosses roles or tiers"}, {"display_text": "Trust depends on answerability.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: Trust depends on answerability. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Trust depends on answerability"]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Trust depends on answerability"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 1, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-backfill-batch-001", "ledger_sha256": "bded1ab45ccd00c90751f1a860c698f68a44daf3ba85ea9f8f0c46a396d680e4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Accountable Gatekeeping Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:accountable_gatekeeping_design", "slug": "accountable_gatekeeping_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 3, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 3 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A concentrated passage point controls which people, claims, signals, artifacts, requests, resources, stories, risks, or opportunities reach the next audience or stage. Because the downstream audience usually sees only what passed, it cannot easily observe the denied, delayed, deprioritized, reframed, or diverted cases. The gatekeeper can therefore shape attention, legitimacy, access, and representation while appearing merely to transmit or sort.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Diagnose opaque or skewable choke-point selection while treating legitimate need for selective passage as an application gate."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any listed literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "The reconciled route preserves the final-method diagnostic relation while excluding goals, feasibility conditions, and application constraints."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Its mandatory choke-point structure includes selective passage, selector discretion, and a downstream audience that cannot directly observe the excluded pool. Under legal role renaming this entails the complete atom predicate.", "role_mapping": "Mandatory gatekeeping roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: A scarce channel or choke point controls downstream passage.", "slug": "gatekeeping", "tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b001_a08_kg_a1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A scarce channel, stage, medium, queue, agenda, feed, panel, platform, interface, office, or reviewer controls downstream passage. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A scarce channel, stage, medium, queue, agenda, feed, panel, platform, interface, office, or reviewer controls downstream passage."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER", "name": "Gatekeeping", "one_liner": "An actor or mechanism at a choke point exercises selective passage control, shaping the downstream distribution in ways the audience cannot directly observe.", "page_ref": "prime:gatekeeping", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Mandatory gatekeeping roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: A scarce channel or choke point controls downstream passage.", "slug": "gatekeeping", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Its mandatory choke-point structure includes selective passage, selector discretion, and a downstream audience that cannot directly observe the excluded pool. Under legal role renaming this entails the complete atom predicate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A scarce channel or choke point controls downstream passage.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "This candidate does not universally preserve the atom complete with its polarity, scope, modality, and qualifiers.", "slug": "accountability"}], "residual_id": "r:accountable_gatekeeping_design:b001_a08_kg_a2", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "The frozen shortlist does not universally entail this complete predicate under a legal role mapping, so the open-world remainder is preserved explicitly."}}, "condition_id": "b001_a08_kg_a2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Affected parties or downstream audiences cannot directly inspect the full candidate pool, excluded cases, ranking logic, or reason for denial. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Affected parties or downstream audiences cannot directly inspect the full candidate pool, excluded cases, ranking logic, or reason for denial."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "This candidate does not universally preserve the atom complete with its polarity, scope, modality, and qualifiers.", "slug": "accountability"}], "normalized_requirement": "Affected parties or downstream audiences cannot inspect the candidate pool, exclusions, ranking logic, or denial reasons.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "The frozen shortlist does not universally entail this complete predicate under a legal role mapping, so the open-world remainder is preserved explicitly. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Affected parties or downstream audiences cannot inspect the candidate pool, exclusions, ranking logic, or denial reasons.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any listed literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "The reconciled route preserves the final-method diagnostic relation while excluding goals, feasibility conditions, and application constraints."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Its mandatory choke-point structure includes selective passage, selector discretion, and a downstream audience that cannot directly observe the excluded pool. Under legal role renaming this entails the complete atom predicate.", "role_mapping": "Mandatory gatekeeping roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: A scarce channel or choke point controls downstream passage.", "slug": "gatekeeping", "tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b001_a08_kg_a1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A scarce channel, stage, medium, queue, agenda, feed, panel, platform, interface, office, or reviewer controls downstream passage. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A scarce channel, stage, medium, queue, agenda, feed, panel, platform, interface, office, or reviewer controls downstream passage."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER", "name": "Gatekeeping", "one_liner": "An actor or mechanism at a choke point exercises selective passage control, shaping the downstream distribution in ways the audience cannot directly observe.", "page_ref": "prime:gatekeeping", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Mandatory gatekeeping roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: A scarce channel or choke point controls downstream passage.", "slug": "gatekeeping", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Its mandatory choke-point structure includes selective passage, selector discretion, and a downstream audience that cannot directly observe the excluded pool. Under legal role renaming this entails the complete atom predicate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A scarce channel or choke point controls downstream passage.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The mandatory conflict-of-interest pattern requires a decision-maker whose incompatible duties or interests create incentives that can skew outcomes.", "role_mapping": "Mandatory conflict of interest roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: Gatekeeper discretion, private information, incentives, authority, bias, or algorithmic rules can skew outcomes.", "slug": "conflict_of_interest", "tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b001_a08_kg_a4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The gatekeeper has discretion, private information, strategic incentives, status authority, institutional bias, or algorithmic rules that can skew outcomes. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The gatekeeper has discretion, private information, strategic incentives, status authority, institutional bias, or algorithmic rules that can skew outcomes."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER", "name": "Conflict of Interest", "one_liner": "Competing incentives.", "page_ref": "prime:conflict_of_interest", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Mandatory conflict of interest roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: Gatekeeper discretion, private information, incentives, authority, bias, or algorithmic rules can skew outcomes.", "slug": "conflict_of_interest", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The mandatory conflict-of-interest pattern requires a decision-maker whose incompatible duties or interests create incentives that can skew outcomes."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Gatekeeper discretion, private information, incentives, authority, bias, or algorithmic rules can skew outcomes.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any listed literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "The reconciled route preserves the final-method diagnostic relation while excluding goals, feasibility conditions, and application constraints."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Its mandatory choke-point structure includes selective passage, selector discretion, and a downstream audience that cannot directly observe the excluded pool. Under legal role renaming this entails the complete atom predicate.", "role_mapping": "Mandatory gatekeeping roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: A scarce channel or choke point controls downstream passage.", "slug": "gatekeeping", "tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b001_a08_kg_a1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A scarce channel, stage, medium, queue, agenda, feed, panel, platform, interface, office, or reviewer controls downstream passage. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A scarce channel, stage, medium, queue, agenda, feed, panel, platform, interface, office, or reviewer controls downstream passage."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER", "name": "Gatekeeping", "one_liner": "An actor or mechanism at a choke point exercises selective passage control, shaping the downstream distribution in ways the audience cannot directly observe.", "page_ref": "prime:gatekeeping", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Mandatory gatekeeping roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: A scarce channel or choke point controls downstream passage.", "slug": "gatekeeping", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Its mandatory choke-point structure includes selective passage, selector discretion, and a downstream audience that cannot directly observe the excluded pool. Under legal role renaming this entails the complete atom predicate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A scarce channel or choke point controls downstream passage.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "This candidate does not universally preserve the atom complete with its polarity, scope, modality, and qualifiers.", "slug": "gatekeeping"}], "residual_id": "r:accountable_gatekeeping_design:b001_a08_kg_a5", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "The frozen shortlist does not universally entail this complete predicate under a legal role mapping, so the open-world remainder is preserved explicitly."}}, "condition_id": "b001_a08_kg_a5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Downstream decisions treat the passed set as if it naturally represents the available world. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Downstream decisions treat the passed set as if it naturally represents the available world."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "This candidate does not universally preserve the atom complete with its polarity, scope, modality, and qualifiers.", "slug": "gatekeeping"}], "normalized_requirement": "Downstream decisions treat the passed set as naturally representative of the available world.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "The frozen shortlist does not universally entail this complete predicate under a legal role mapping, so the open-world remainder is preserved explicitly. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Downstream decisions treat the passed set as naturally representative of the available world.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The system needs selective passage rather than completely open flow because attention, quality, safety, capacity, legality, or sequencing is constrained.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Without a gate, the downstream system may be flooded, unsafe, low-quality, or unable to prioritize; without accountability, the gate becomes an opaque authority that can transform scarcity, attention, and legitimacy into unreviewable control. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: The system needs selective passage rather than completely open flow because attention, quality, safety, capacity, legality, or sequencing is constrained. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The system needs selective passage rather than completely open flow because attention, quality, safety, capacity, legality, or sequencing is constrained.", "Without a gate, the downstream system may be flooded, unsafe, low-quality, or unable to prioritize; without accountability, the gate becomes an opaque authority that can transform scarcity, attention, and legitimacy into unreviewable control."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "The system needs selective passage rather than completely open flow because attention, quality, safety, capacity, legality, or sequencing is constrained."}, {"display_text": "The cost of arbitrary exclusion, capture, censorship, biased selection, hidden agenda-setting, or legitimacy loss is material.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: The cost of arbitrary exclusion, capture, censorship, biased selection, hidden agenda-setting, or legitimacy loss is material. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The cost of arbitrary exclusion, capture, censorship, biased selection, hidden agenda-setting, or legitimacy loss is material."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The cost of arbitrary exclusion, capture, censorship, biased selection, hidden agenda-setting, or legitimacy loss is material."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 1, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-backfill-batch-001", "ledger_sha256": "bded1ab45ccd00c90751f1a860c698f68a44daf3ba85ea9f8f0c46a396d680e4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Accumulation Compaction", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:accumulation_compaction", "slug": "accumulation_compaction"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 0, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 0 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 0 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 0}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is layered burden. A system preserves successive records because each record once had value. Over time, however, the layers become too numerous for present operation. Users cannot tell which guidance is current. Search returns stale duplicates. Storage and indexing costs rise. Backlogs become graveyards. Archives preserve information but not usability. The system has memory, but the memory is no longer easy to use.\n\nA second pressure makes the problem difficult: deletion is often too risky. Old records may contain evidence, context, source authority, recovery information, minority views, or past commitments. Flattening or deleting them can erase accountability. The core tension is therefore not “keep or delete.” It is “how should history be re-shaped so the present remains usable and the past remains recoverable enough?”", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system preserves successive layers of records, artifacts, decisions, versions, logs, requests, or documentation, but the growing accumulation becomes too bulky, duplicated, costly, confusing, or slow to use effectively."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Layer growth exceeds operational use.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source states: Layer growth exceeds operational use. The normalized source condition requiring clarification is: Layer growth exceeds operational use. The wording is retained for source review rather than assigned a stronger semantic role.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["layer_growth_exceeds_operational_use"]}, "function": "MALFORMED", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because the source wording is not structurally clear enough to support a formal trigger role without clarification.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "layer_growth_exceeds_operational_use"}, {"display_text": "Detail has mixed value.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The archetype is especially useful when different details have different future value. In this archetype, the relevant source condition requiring clarification is: Detail has mixed value. The wording is retained for source review rather than assigned a stronger semantic role.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["detail_has_mixed_value", "The archetype is especially useful when different details have different future value."]}, "function": "MALFORMED", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because the source wording is not structurally clear enough to support a formal trigger role without clarification.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "detail_has_mixed_value"}, {"display_text": "Full retention creates burden.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source states: Full retention creates burden. The normalized source condition requiring clarification is: Full retention creates burden. The wording is retained for source review rather than assigned a stronger semantic role.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["full_retention_creates_burden"]}, "function": "MALFORMED", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because the source wording is not structurally clear enough to support a formal trigger role without clarification.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "full_retention_creates_burden"}, {"display_text": "Deletion is too risky.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A second pressure makes the problem difficult: deletion is often too risky. In this archetype, the relevant source condition requiring clarification is: Deletion is too risky. The wording is retained for source review rather than assigned a stronger semantic role.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["deletion_is_too_risky", "A second pressure makes the problem difficult: deletion is often too risky."]}, "function": "MALFORMED", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because the source wording is not structurally clear enough to support a formal trigger role without clarification.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "deletion_is_too_risky"}, {"display_text": "Current state requires interpretation.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source states: Current state requires interpretation. The normalized source condition requiring clarification is: Current state requires interpretation. The wording is retained for source review rather than assigned a stronger semantic role.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["current_state_requires_interpretation"]}, "function": "MALFORMED", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because the source wording is not structurally clear enough to support a formal trigger role without clarification.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "current_state_requires_interpretation"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 1, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-backfill-batch-001", "ledger_sha256": "bded1ab45ccd00c90751f1a860c698f68a44daf3ba85ea9f8f0c46a396d680e4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Activation Decay Measurement", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:activation_decay_measurement", "slug": "activation_decay_measurement"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 2 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 2}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is stale activation. A system creates a primed state, but the state is latent and temporary. Because teams cannot easily see whether it persists, they rely on exposure records, training completion, reminder counts, or campaign delivery as if those were evidence of current attention or readiness.\n\nThis creates timing failure. The action opportunity, assessment, decision, or transfer moment arrives after the primed state has weakened. The system then mislabels the failure as motivation, quality, compliance, or competence when the actual failure is that the activation window expired.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A latent primed state weakens with elapsed time, so an action or assessment may occur after the activation needed to influence it has expired."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "This branch preserves the complete remedy-free diagnostic route; goals, feasibility clauses, gates, deployment constraints, and supporting context remain outside the DNF."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Every priming instance contains a prior cue or exposure that creates a transient latent activation state, so the prime entails the complete condition.", "role_mapping": "Prime stimulus maps to cue or exposure; spreading activation maps to the latent temporary primed state.", "slug": "priming", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "ext001_activation_decay_measurement_a01", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored structural_problem, prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: A cue or exposure creates a latent and temporary primed state.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A cue or exposure creates a latent and temporary primed state."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Priming", "one_liner": "Prior exposure to a stimulus transiently activates related representations in memory, biasing or speeding subsequent processing, often without awareness.", "page_ref": "prime:priming", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Prime stimulus maps to cue or exposure; spreading activation maps to the latent temporary primed state.", "slug": "priming", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Every priming instance contains a prior cue or exposure that creates a transient latent activation state, so the prime entails the complete condition."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A cue or exposure creates a latent and temporary primed state.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "EXT001-C002", "dnf": [["EXT001-U002-O1"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"obligation_id": "EXT001-U002-O1", "predicate": "Elapsed time weakens that primed state before the relevant action, assessment, or transfer moment."}], "predicate": "Elapsed time weakens that primed state before the relevant action, assessment, or transfer moment.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Elapsed time weakens that primed state before the relevant action, assessment, or transfer moment.", "unit_id": "EXT001-U002"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"catalog_exhaustion": "CONDITION_LEVEL", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Elapsed time weakens that primed state before the relevant action, assessment, or transfer moment.", "slug": "preparation"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Elapsed time weakens that primed state before the relevant action, assessment, or transfer moment.", "slug": "suspension"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Elapsed time weakens that primed state before the relevant action, assessment, or transfer moment.", "slug": "gradual_deterioration"}], "residual_id": "EXT001:activation_decay_measurement:C02", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding."}}, "condition_id": "ext001_activation_decay_measurement_a02", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored structural_problem, prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: Elapsed time weakens that primed state before the relevant action, assessment, or transfer moment.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Elapsed time weakens that primed state before the relevant action, assessment, or transfer moment."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Elapsed time weakens that primed state before the relevant action, assessment, or transfer moment.", "slug": "preparation"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Elapsed time weakens that primed state before the relevant action, assessment, or transfer moment.", "slug": "suspension"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Elapsed time weakens that primed state before the relevant action, assessment, or transfer moment.", "slug": "gradual_deterioration"}], "normalized_requirement": "Elapsed time weakens that primed state before the relevant action, assessment, or transfer moment.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Elapsed time weakens that primed state before the relevant action, assessment, or transfer moment.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Exposure or completion records are being treated as evidence that activation is still present.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored structural_problem, prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Exposure or completion records are being treated as evidence that activation is still present. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Exposure or completion records are being treated as evidence that activation is still present.", "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored structural_problem, prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Exposure or completion records are being treated as evidence that activation is still present."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"candidate_ledger_sha256": "96f72d2139077fd57bf795048ebef33b3fd574b20963170080ec916b5b3b92fe", "extension_id": "new-archetypes-extension-001", "ledger_id": "prime-production-v1.2-extension-001", "ledger_sha256": "9644520614744632d1d36da44b1acd77ce432852c6083eb871203521c166efce"}, "base_projection_sha256": "841e0c7f3cb8e8054475ad29a8a14745a416b4fc115559a44878b94292e673ec", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "ca09ed9fe1598ce7072755b530de5553f5ee0a7cd64ae82d9e4a4e2149a37788", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Activation Energy Cost-Benefit Analysis", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:activation_energy_cost_benefit_analysis", "slug": "activation_energy_cost_benefit_analysis"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 2, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 2 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a mismatch between visible up-front cost and delayed post-threshold value. Decision makers may count recurring benefits while undercounting transition disruption, stakeholder burden, political capital, coordination load, and maintenance needs. They may also treat the threshold as if it were already crossed, even though the current state is still far below it.\n\nThis creates two opposite risks. One risk is abandoning a valuable transition too early because below-threshold evidence looks weak. The other risk is escalating commitment to an activation effort that is unlikely to cross the threshold or sustain its benefits.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Diagnose thresholded start-up economics, preserving the activation relation separately from its scoped burden qualifier."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any listed literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "The reconciled route preserves the final-method diagnostic relation while excluding goals, feasibility conditions, and application constraints."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Its mandatory barrier-and-threshold pattern requires an up-front input before the process crosses into a useful or self-sustaining regime. Under legal role renaming this entails the complete atom predicate.", "role_mapping": "Mandatory activation energy roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: The first phase of change imposes an up-front activation burden before immediate visible benefit appears.", "slug": "activation_energy", "tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b001_a10_en_a1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The first phase of a change is expensive, disruptive, slow, politically costly, or coordination-heavy relative to immediate visible benefit. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The first phase of a change is expensive, disruptive, slow, politically costly, or coordination-heavy relative to immediate visible benefit."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER", "name": "Activation Energy", "one_liner": "The minimum input that must be supplied to push a thermodynamically favorable but stalled process past a barrier before momentum carries it to completion.", "page_ref": "prime:activation_energy", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Mandatory activation energy roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: The first phase of change imposes an up-front activation burden before immediate visible benefit appears.", "slug": "activation_energy", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Its mandatory barrier-and-threshold pattern requires an up-front input before the process crosses into a useful or self-sustaining regime. Under legal role renaming this entails the complete atom predicate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The first phase of change imposes an up-front activation burden before immediate visible benefit appears.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Its mandatory barrier-and-threshold pattern requires an up-front input before the process crosses into a useful or self-sustaining regime. Under legal role renaming this entails the complete atom predicate.", "role_mapping": "Mandatory activation energy roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: That activation burden is expensive, disruptive, slow, politically costly, or coordination-heavy relative to immediate visible benefit.", "slug": "activation_energy", "tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b001_a10_en_a2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The first phase of a change is expensive, disruptive, slow, politically costly, or coordination-heavy relative to immediate visible benefit. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The first phase of a change is expensive, disruptive, slow, politically costly, or coordination-heavy relative to immediate visible benefit."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER", "name": "Activation Energy", "one_liner": "The minimum input that must be supplied to push a thermodynamically favorable but stalled process past a barrier before momentum carries it to completion.", "page_ref": "prime:activation_energy", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Mandatory activation energy roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: That activation burden is expensive, disruptive, slow, politically costly, or coordination-heavy relative to immediate visible benefit.", "slug": "activation_energy", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Its mandatory barrier-and-threshold pattern requires an up-front input before the process crosses into a useful or self-sustaining regime. Under legal role renaming this entails the complete atom predicate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "That activation burden is expensive, disruptive, slow, politically costly, or coordination-heavy relative to immediate visible benefit.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Its mandatory barrier-and-threshold pattern requires an up-front input before the process crosses into a useful or self-sustaining regime. Under legal role renaming this entails the complete atom predicate.", "role_mapping": "Mandatory activation energy roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: Benefits are nonlinear: partial investment below a threshold yields little value, while crossing it produces usefulness, adoption, stability, or self-reinforcement.", "slug": "activation_energy", "tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b001_a10_en_a3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Benefits are nonlinear: below a threshold, partial investment yields little value; above it, the system becomes useful, adopted, stable, or self-reinforcing. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Benefits are nonlinear: below a threshold, partial investment yields little value; above it, the system becomes useful, adopted, stable, or self-reinforcing."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER", "name": "Activation Energy", "one_liner": "The minimum input that must be supplied to push a thermodynamically favorable but stalled process past a barrier before momentum carries it to completion.", "page_ref": "prime:activation_energy", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Mandatory activation energy roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: Benefits are nonlinear: partial investment below a threshold yields little value, while crossing it produces usefulness, adoption, stability, or self-reinforcement.", "slug": "activation_energy", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Its mandatory barrier-and-threshold pattern requires an up-front input before the process crosses into a useful or self-sustaining regime. Under legal role renaming this entails the complete atom predicate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Benefits are nonlinear: partial investment below a threshold yields little value, while crossing it produces usefulness, adoption, stability, or self-reinforcement.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any listed literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "The reconciled route preserves the final-method diagnostic relation while excluding goals, feasibility conditions, and application constraints."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "This candidate does not universally preserve the atom complete with its polarity, scope, modality, and qualifiers.", "slug": "activation_energy"}], "residual_id": "r:activation_energy_cost_benefit_analysis:b001_a10_en_a6", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "The frozen shortlist does not universally entail this complete predicate under a legal role mapping, so the open-world remainder is preserved explicitly."}}, "condition_id": "b001_a10_en_a6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Past attempts failed because activation costs, transition burdens, or post-threshold maintenance conditions were underestimated. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Past attempts failed because activation costs, transition burdens, or post-threshold maintenance conditions were underestimated."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "This candidate does not universally preserve the atom complete with its polarity, scope, modality, and qualifiers.", "slug": "activation_energy"}], "normalized_requirement": "Past attempts failed because activation, transition, or maintenance burdens were underestimated.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "The frozen shortlist does not universally entail this complete predicate under a legal role mapping, so the open-world remainder is preserved explicitly. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Past attempts failed because activation, transition, or maintenance burdens were underestimated.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Decision makers are debating whether to commit fully, pilot first, delay, redesign, subsidize, or abandon an activation effort.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The other risk is escalating commitment to an activation effort that is unlikely to cross the threshold or sustain its benefits. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: Decision makers are debating whether to commit fully, pilot first, delay, redesign, subsidize, or abandon an activation effort. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Decision makers are debating whether to commit fully, pilot first, delay, redesign, subsidize, or abandon an activation effort.", "The other risk is escalating commitment to an activation effort that is unlikely to cross the threshold or sustain its benefits."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Decision makers are debating whether to commit fully, pilot first, delay, redesign, subsidize, or abandon an activation effort."}, {"display_text": "The initiative competes with lower-barrier alternatives or with other uses of scarce money, attention, legitimacy, or capacity.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: The initiative competes with lower-barrier alternatives or with other uses of scarce money, attention, legitimacy, or capacity. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The initiative competes with lower-barrier alternatives or with other uses of scarce money, attention, legitimacy, or capacity."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The initiative competes with lower-barrier alternatives or with other uses of scarce money, attention, legitimacy, or capacity."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 1, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-backfill-batch-001", "ledger_sha256": "bded1ab45ccd00c90751f1a860c698f68a44daf3ba85ea9f8f0c46a396d680e4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Active Goal Shielding", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:active_goal_shielding", "slug": "active_goal_shielding"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A selected goal loses execution continuity because competing goals remain easy to access, cue, justify, escalate, or opportunistically add during the active pursuit window. Each alternative may be valuable in isolation, but during the current interval it competes for scarce attention, motivation, working memory, social permission, time, and self-control. The result is goal switching, premature re-prioritization, dilution, derailment, or rebound after over-suppression.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Diagnose active-goal interference while separating intervention-selection costs and the desired release behavior from the trigger."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any listed literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "The reconciled route preserves the final-method diagnostic relation while excluding goals, feasibility conditions, and application constraints."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Its mandatory pattern requires one active goal, incompatible but still legitimate competitors, and temporary suppression during the pursuit window. Under legal role renaming this entails the complete atom predicate.", "role_mapping": "Mandatory goal shielding roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: One goal is active for a defined pursuit window.", "slug": "goal_shielding", "tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b001_a11_gs_a1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: One goal has been selected as the active goal for a defined interval, stage, sprint, emergency, habit episode, study session, or execution window. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["One goal has been selected as the active goal for a defined interval, stage, sprint, emergency, habit episode, study session, or execution window."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER", "name": "Goal Shielding", "one_liner": "While pursuing an active goal, suppressing access to competing goals that would compromise it, releasing the suppression only once the active goal ends.", "page_ref": "prime:goal_shielding", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Mandatory goal shielding roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: One goal is active for a defined pursuit window.", "slug": "goal_shielding", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Its mandatory pattern requires one active goal, incompatible but still legitimate competitors, and temporary suppression during the pursuit window. Under legal role renaming this entails the complete atom predicate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "One goal is active for a defined pursuit window.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Its mandatory pattern requires one active goal, incompatible but still legitimate competitors, and temporary suppression during the pursuit window. Under legal role renaming this entails the complete atom predicate.", "role_mapping": "Mandatory goal shielding roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: Alternative goals are legitimate but incompatible with pursuing the active goal now.", "slug": "goal_shielding", "tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b001_a11_gs_a2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Alternative goals are legitimate but incompatible with the active goal if they are pursued now. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Alternative goals are legitimate but incompatible with the active goal if they are pursued now."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER", "name": "Goal Shielding", "one_liner": "While pursuing an active goal, suppressing access to competing goals that would compromise it, releasing the suppression only once the active goal ends.", "page_ref": "prime:goal_shielding", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Mandatory goal shielding roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: Alternative goals are legitimate but incompatible with pursuing the active goal now.", "slug": "goal_shielding", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Its mandatory pattern requires one active goal, incompatible but still legitimate competitors, and temporary suppression during the pursuit window. Under legal role renaming this entails the complete atom predicate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Alternative goals are legitimate but incompatible with pursuing the active goal now.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "This candidate does not universally preserve the atom complete with its polarity, scope, modality, and qualifiers.", "slug": "goal_shielding"}], "residual_id": "r:active_goal_shielding:b001_a11_gs_a3", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "The frozen shortlist does not universally entail this complete predicate under a legal role mapping, so the open-world remainder is preserved explicitly."}}, "condition_id": "b001_a11_gs_a3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Competing goals are highly cueable, socially requested, emotionally attractive, urgent-seeming, habitual, novelty-rich, or easier than the active goal. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Competing goals are highly cueable, socially requested, emotionally attractive, urgent-seeming, habitual, novelty-rich, or easier than the active goal."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "This candidate does not universally preserve the atom complete with its polarity, scope, modality, and qualifiers.", "slug": "goal_shielding"}], "normalized_requirement": "Competing goals are highly cueable, socially requested, emotionally attractive, urgent-seeming, habitual, novelty-rich, or easier.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "The frozen shortlist does not universally entail this complete predicate under a legal role mapping, so the open-world remainder is preserved explicitly. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Competing goals are highly cueable, socially requested, emotionally attractive, urgent-seeming, habitual, novelty-rich, or easier.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The agent or team cannot rely on raw willpower, memory, or repeated deliberation to preserve the active goal.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A selected goal loses execution continuity because competing goals remain easy to access, cue, justify, escalate, or opportunistically add during the active pursuit window. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: The agent or team cannot rely on raw willpower, memory, or repeated deliberation to preserve the active goal. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The agent or team cannot rely on raw willpower, memory, or repeated deliberation to preserve the active goal.", "A selected goal loses execution continuity because competing goals remain easy to access, cue, justify, escalate, or opportunistically add during the active pursuit window."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The agent or team cannot rely on raw willpower, memory, or repeated deliberation to preserve the active goal."}, {"display_text": "Reopening the priority decision too often would consume attention, invite present bias, or make local exceptions accumulate into abandonment.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The active goal needs enough protection to survive competing activations, but not so much protection that it becomes blind to safety exceptions, changed facts, legitimate higher priorities, or the eventual need to release the suppressed goals. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: Reopening the priority decision too often would consume attention, invite present bias, or make local exceptions accumulate into abandonment. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Reopening the priority decision too often would consume attention, invite present bias, or make local exceptions accumulate into abandonment.", "The active goal needs enough protection to survive competing activations, but not so much protection that it becomes blind to safety exceptions, changed facts, legitimate higher priorities, or the eventual need to release the suppressed goals."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Reopening the priority decision too often would consume attention, invite present bias, or make local exceptions accumulate into abandonment."}, {"display_text": "The competing goals should not be destroyed; they should be suppressed, parked, delayed, rerouted, or explicitly escalated until a release condition.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The active goal needs enough protection to survive competing activations, but not so much protection that it becomes blind to safety exceptions, changed facts, legitimate higher priorities, or the eventual need to release the suppressed goals. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: The competing goals should not be destroyed; they should be suppressed, parked, delayed, rerouted, or explicitly escalated until a release condition. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The competing goals should not be destroyed; they should be suppressed, parked, delayed, rerouted, or explicitly escalated until a release condition.", "The active goal needs enough protection to survive competing activations, but not so much protection that it becomes blind to safety exceptions, changed facts, legitimate higher priorities, or the eventual need to release the suppressed goals."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The competing goals should not be destroyed; they should be suppressed, parked, delayed, rerouted, or explicitly escalated until a release condition."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 1, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-backfill-batch-001", "ledger_sha256": "bded1ab45ccd00c90751f1a860c698f68a44daf3ba85ea9f8f0c46a396d680e4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Active Knowledge Construction", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:active_knowledge_construction", "slug": "active_knowledge_construction"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 3, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 3 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a gap between received information and owned understanding. A system can deliver accurate content, but the learner interprets that content through existing assumptions. If those assumptions stay hidden, the learner may memorize terms while preserving the same flawed model.\n\nThis creates brittle performance. People succeed on the taught example but fail on a variation. They can follow a tutorial but cannot troubleshoot. They can quote a policy but cannot explain what it is for. They can repeat a lesson learned but keep acting from the old interpretation.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Diagnose failures of usable mental-model construction while keeping reorganization context and desired transfer outcomes outside the trigger."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any listed literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "The reconciled route preserves the final-method diagnostic relation while excluding goals, feasibility conditions, and application constraints."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "This candidate does not universally preserve the atom complete with its polarity, scope, modality, and qualifiers.", "slug": "constructivist_learning"}], "residual_id": "r:active_knowledge_construction:b001_a12_kl_a1", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "The frozen shortlist does not universally entail this complete predicate under a legal role mapping, so the open-world remainder is preserved explicitly."}}, "condition_id": "b001_a12_kl_a1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: People can recognize or repeat terms but cannot explain relationships, causes, tradeoffs, or applicability conditions. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["People can recognize or repeat terms but cannot explain relationships, causes, tradeoffs, or applicability conditions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "This candidate does not universally preserve the atom complete with its polarity, scope, modality, and qualifiers.", "slug": "constructivist_learning"}], "normalized_requirement": "People can repeat terms but cannot explain relationships, causes, tradeoffs, or applicability conditions.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "The frozen shortlist does not universally entail this complete predicate under a legal role mapping, so the open-world remainder is preserved explicitly. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "People can repeat terms but cannot explain relationships, causes, tradeoffs, or applicability conditions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any listed literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "The reconciled route preserves the final-method diagnostic relation while excluding goals, feasibility conditions, and application constraints."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "This candidate does not universally preserve the atom complete with its polarity, scope, modality, and qualifiers.", "slug": "transfer_of_learning"}], "residual_id": "r:active_knowledge_construction:b001_a12_kl_a2", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "The frozen shortlist does not universally entail this complete predicate under a legal role mapping, so the open-world remainder is preserved explicitly."}}, "condition_id": "b001_a12_kl_a2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Training or instruction produces short-term compliance but weak transfer to new cases. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Training or instruction produces short-term compliance but weak transfer to new cases."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "This candidate does not universally preserve the atom complete with its polarity, scope, modality, and qualifiers.", "slug": "transfer_of_learning"}], "normalized_requirement": "Training produces short-term compliance but weak transfer to new cases.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "The frozen shortlist does not universally entail this complete predicate under a legal role mapping, so the open-world remainder is preserved explicitly. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Training produces short-term compliance but weak transfer to new cases.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any listed literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "The reconciled route preserves the final-method diagnostic relation while excluding goals, feasibility conditions, and application constraints."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "This candidate does not universally preserve the atom complete with its polarity, scope, modality, and qualifiers.", "slug": "constructivist_learning"}], "residual_id": "r:active_knowledge_construction:b001_a12_kl_a3", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "The frozen shortlist does not universally entail this complete predicate under a legal role mapping, so the open-world remainder is preserved explicitly."}}, "condition_id": "b001_a12_kl_a3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Learners carry prior misconceptions or partial schemas that distort new information. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Learners carry prior misconceptions or partial schemas that distort new information."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "This candidate does not universally preserve the atom complete with its polarity, scope, modality, and qualifiers.", "slug": "constructivist_learning"}], "normalized_requirement": "Prior misconceptions or partial schemas distort new information.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "The frozen shortlist does not universally entail this complete predicate under a legal role mapping, so the open-world remainder is preserved explicitly. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Prior misconceptions or partial schemas distort new information.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "DISJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A new tool, process, domain, or concept requires people to reorganize what they already believe.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when people can repeat language but cannot use it in new cases, when prior misconceptions distort new information, or when learners need to connect abstract concepts to real situations. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: A new tool, process, domain, or concept requires people to reorganize what they already believe. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A new tool, process, domain, or concept requires people to reorganize what they already believe.", "It is especially useful when people can repeat language but cannot use it in new cases, when prior misconceptions distort new information, or when learners need to connect abstract concepts to real situations."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "A new tool, process, domain, or concept requires people to reorganize what they already believe."}, {"display_text": "The desired outcome is understanding that can be used, not only exposure to content.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: The desired outcome is understanding that can be used, not only exposure to content. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The desired outcome is understanding that can be used, not only exposure to content."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The desired outcome is understanding that can be used, not only exposure to content."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 1, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-backfill-batch-001", "ledger_sha256": "bded1ab45ccd00c90751f1a860c698f68a44daf3ba85ea9f8f0c46a396d680e4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Acute Stabilization Command", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:acute_stabilization_command", "slug": "acute_stabilization_command"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 2 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 2}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system faces an acute disruption where normal decision flow, distributed ownership, full diagnosis, and ordinary service commitments are too slow or ambiguous. Without a temporary stabilization regime, actors either over-deliberate while harm spreads, duplicate work under unclear command, make irreversible fixes under pressure, or let emergency authority persist after the acute phase.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Diagnose the acute command regime while separating containment capabilities, recovery goals, and authority-abuse constraints."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any listed literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "The reconciled route preserves the final-method diagnostic relation while excluding goals, feasibility conditions, and application constraints."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Its mandatory pattern requires an acute time-critical disruption and temporary compression of ordinary governance to prioritize stabilization. Under legal role renaming this entails the complete atom predicate.", "role_mapping": "Mandatory incident response roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: A disruption is time-critical and continued delay plausibly increases harm, spread, loss, or unsafe uncertainty.", "slug": "incident_response", "tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b001_a13_ir_a1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A disruption is time-critical and continuing delay plausibly increases harm, spread, loss, or unsafe uncertainty. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A disruption is time-critical and continuing delay plausibly increases harm, spread, loss, or unsafe uncertainty."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER", "name": "Incident Response", "one_liner": "A system facing acute, time-critical disruption engages a temporary command regime that prioritises stabilisation over diagnosis, accepts reversible degradation, defers root-cause analysis, and compresses decision authority for the duration of the acute phase only.", "page_ref": "prime:incident_response", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Mandatory incident response roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: A disruption is time-critical and continued delay plausibly increases harm, spread, loss, or unsafe uncertainty.", "slug": "incident_response", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Its mandatory pattern requires an acute time-critical disruption and temporary compression of ordinary governance to prioritize stabilization. Under legal role renaming this entails the complete atom predicate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A disruption is time-critical and continued delay plausibly increases harm, spread, loss, or unsafe uncertainty.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Its mandatory pattern requires an acute time-critical disruption and temporary compression of ordinary governance to prioritize stabilization. Under legal role renaming this entails the complete atom predicate.", "role_mapping": "Mandatory incident response roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: Normal governance lacks the speed, authority clarity, or coordination density needed for immediate stabilization.", "slug": "incident_response", "tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b001_a13_ir_a2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Without a temporary stabilization regime, actors either over-deliberate while harm spreads, duplicate work under unclear command, make irreversible fixes under pressure, or let emergency authority persist after the acute phase. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Normal governance lacks the speed, authority clarity, or coordination density needed for immediate stabilization.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Normal governance lacks the speed, authority clarity, or coordination density needed for immediate stabilization.", "Without a temporary stabilization regime, actors either over-deliberate while harm spreads, duplicate work under unclear command, make irreversible fixes under pressure, or let emergency authority persist after the acute phase."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER", "name": "Incident Response", "one_liner": "A system facing acute, time-critical disruption engages a temporary command regime that prioritises stabilisation over diagnosis, accepts reversible degradation, defers root-cause analysis, and compresses decision authority for the duration of the acute phase only.", "page_ref": "prime:incident_response", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Mandatory incident response roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: Normal governance lacks the speed, authority clarity, or coordination density needed for immediate stabilization.", "slug": "incident_response", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Its mandatory pattern requires an acute time-critical disruption and temporary compression of ordinary governance to prioritize stabilization. Under legal role renaming this entails the complete atom predicate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Normal governance lacks the speed, authority clarity, or coordination density needed for immediate stabilization.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The exact root cause may be unknown, but some reversible containment or degradation actions can reduce harm.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: The exact root cause may be unknown, but some reversible containment or degradation actions can reduce harm. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The exact root cause may be unknown, but some reversible containment or degradation actions can reduce harm."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "The exact root cause may be unknown, but some reversible containment or degradation actions can reduce harm."}, {"display_text": "A safety, continuity, or service floor can be named even if full restoration is impossible immediately.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system faces an acute disruption where normal decision flow, distributed ownership, full diagnosis, and ordinary service commitments are too slow or ambiguous. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: A safety, continuity, or service floor can be named even if full restoration is impossible immediately. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A safety, continuity, or service floor can be named even if full restoration is impossible immediately.", "A system faces an acute disruption where normal decision flow, distributed ownership, full diagnosis, and ordinary service commitments are too slow or ambiguous."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "A safety, continuity, or service floor can be named even if full restoration is impossible immediately."}, {"display_text": "Multiple actors must coordinate without turning every decision into a consensus process.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: Multiple actors must coordinate without turning every decision into a consensus process. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Multiple actors must coordinate without turning every decision into a consensus process."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Multiple actors must coordinate without turning every decision into a consensus process."}, {"display_text": "The incident has an identifiable acute phase that should later hand off to recovery and diagnosis.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system faces an acute disruption where normal decision flow, distributed ownership, full diagnosis, and ordinary service commitments are too slow or ambiguous. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: The incident has an identifiable acute phase that should later hand off to recovery and diagnosis. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The incident has an identifiable acute phase that should later hand off to recovery and diagnosis.", "A system faces an acute disruption where normal decision flow, distributed ownership, full diagnosis, and ordinary service commitments are too slow or ambiguous."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The incident has an identifiable acute phase that should later hand off to recovery and diagnosis."}, {"display_text": "There is enough observability to know whether stabilization actions are improving, worsening, or merely hiding the incident.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The incident requires enough temporary simplification to act under pressure, but simplification can become dangerous if it removes safety constraints, evidence, accountability, or reversion. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: There is enough observability to know whether stabilization actions are improving, worsening, or merely hiding the incident. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["There is enough observability to know whether stabilization actions are improving, worsening, or merely hiding the incident.", "The incident requires enough temporary simplification to act under pressure, but simplification can become dangerous if it removes safety constraints, evidence, accountability, or reversion."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "There is enough observability to know whether stabilization actions are improving, worsening, or merely hiding the incident."}, {"display_text": "Emergency authority or prioritization could cause abuse if not time-bounded and logged.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Without a temporary stabilization regime, actors either over-deliberate while harm spreads, duplicate work under unclear command, make irreversible fixes under pressure, or let emergency authority persist after the acute phase. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: Emergency authority or prioritization could cause abuse if not time-bounded and logged. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Emergency authority or prioritization could cause abuse if not time-bounded and logged.", "Without a temporary stabilization regime, actors either over-deliberate while harm spreads, duplicate work under unclear command, make irreversible fixes under pressure, or let emergency authority persist after the acute phase."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 8, "text": "Emergency authority or prioritization could cause abuse if not time-bounded and logged."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 1, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-backfill-batch-001", "ledger_sha256": "bded1ab45ccd00c90751f1a860c698f68a44daf3ba85ea9f8f0c46a396d680e4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Adaptive Barrier-Circumvention Response", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:adaptive_barrier_circumvention_response", "slug": "adaptive_barrier_circumvention_response"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The defining failure is **population-weighted coverage decay under a still-functioning protective filter**. A barrier may continue\nto recognize, block, neutralize, deter, or penalize the forms it was designed for. Yet those successes remove susceptible forms\nfrom competition and leave a larger relative opportunity for less-covered forms. If the surviving traits or strategies can be\nretained across rounds, the control changes the composition of the population it faces.\n\nThree distinctions matter:\n\n1. **Barrier performance is not the same as effective protection.** A filter can maintain its technical hit rate on the original\n   target while the target becomes a smaller share of the population.\n2. **Change is not automatically selection.** Measurement drift, new inflows, ordinary migration, protected refuges, implementation\n   failure, and random turnover can all change observed composition. The archetype requires competing explanations to remain open\n   until differential persistence is supported.\n3. **More pressure is not automatically more protection.** Intensifying a homogeneous barrier may improve immediate suppression\n   while increasing the relative advantage of uncovered forms and collapsing future option value.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Diagnose durable selection around a heterogeneous barrier while separating monitoring, redesign feasibility, and correlated-layer hazards."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any listed literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "The reconciled route preserves the final-method diagnostic relation while excluding goals, feasibility conditions, and application constraints."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Its mandatory adaptive-population pattern includes variant heterogeneity, differential survival around a durable barrier, repeated exposure, and composition shift, entailing the mapped atom.", "role_mapping": "Mandatory vaccine escape roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: Successful variants can persist, reproduce, spread, be copied, receive more resources, or be learned across rounds.", "slug": "vaccine_escape", "tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "Its mandatory engine requires varying variants whose successful properties persist or reproduce across rounds. Under legal role renaming this entails the complete atom predicate.", "role_mapping": "Mandatory natural selection roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: Successful variants can persist, reproduce, spread, be copied, receive more resources, or be learned across rounds.", "slug": "natural_selection", "tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b001_a14_vb_a2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "retained across rounds, the control changes the composition of the population it faces. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Successful variants can persist, reproduce, spread, be copied, receive more resources, or be learned across rounds.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Successful variants can persist, reproduce, spread, be copied, receive more resources, or be learned across rounds.", "retained across rounds, the control changes the composition of the population it faces."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER", "name": "Vaccine Escape", "one_liner": "A durable barrier imposed on an adaptive population acts as a selection filter, shifting the population toward variants it cannot engage, so effective coverage falls even though the barrier still works exactly as designed.", "page_ref": "prime:vaccine_escape", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Mandatory vaccine escape roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: Successful variants can persist, reproduce, spread, be copied, receive more resources, or be learned across rounds.", "slug": "vaccine_escape", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Its mandatory adaptive-population pattern includes variant heterogeneity, differential survival around a durable barrier, repeated exposure, and composition shift, entailing the mapped atom."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER", "name": "Natural Selection", "one_liner": "A population of varying, heritable variants is filtered by a selection pressure so that the better-performing variants differentially reproduce or persist, shifting the population's composition over rounds — variation, selection, and retention as a substrate-neutral engine.", "page_ref": "prime:natural_selection", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Mandatory natural selection roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: Successful variants can persist, reproduce, spread, be copied, receive more resources, or be learned across rounds.", "slug": "natural_selection", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Its mandatory engine requires varying variants whose successful properties persist or reproduce across rounds. Under legal role renaming this entails the complete atom predicate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Successful variants can persist, reproduce, spread, be copied, receive more resources, or be learned across rounds.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Its mandatory pattern requires heterogeneous barrier engagement, a durable selection differential, repeated exposure, and population-composition shift. Under legal role renaming this entails the complete atom predicate.", "role_mapping": "Mandatory vaccine escape roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: The barrier has heterogeneous coverage and creates a durable differential in survival, persistence, payoff, or detectability.", "slug": "vaccine_escape", "tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b001_a14_vb_a3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A durable control creates unequal survival or persistence across an adaptive population. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The barrier has heterogeneous coverage and creates a durable differential in survival, persistence, payoff, or detectability.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The barrier has heterogeneous coverage and creates a durable differential in survival, persistence, payoff, or detectability.", "A durable control creates unequal survival or persistence across an adaptive population."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER", "name": "Vaccine Escape", "one_liner": "A durable barrier imposed on an adaptive population acts as a selection filter, shifting the population toward variants it cannot engage, so effective coverage falls even though the barrier still works exactly as designed.", "page_ref": "prime:vaccine_escape", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Mandatory vaccine escape roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: The barrier has heterogeneous coverage and creates a durable differential in survival, persistence, payoff, or detectability.", "slug": "vaccine_escape", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Its mandatory pattern requires heterogeneous barrier engagement, a durable selection differential, repeated exposure, and population-composition shift. Under legal role renaming this entails the complete atom predicate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The barrier has heterogeneous coverage and creates a durable differential in survival, persistence, payoff, or detectability.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Its mandatory pattern requires heterogeneous barrier engagement, a durable selection differential, repeated exposure, and population-composition shift. Under legal role renaming this entails the complete atom predicate.", "role_mapping": "Mandatory vaccine escape roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: Barrier exposure is common or sustained enough to alter population composition.", "slug": "vaccine_escape", "tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b001_a14_vb_a4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "retained across rounds, the control changes the composition of the population it faces. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Barrier exposure is common or sustained enough to alter population composition.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Barrier exposure is common or sustained enough to alter population composition.", "retained across rounds, the control changes the composition of the population it faces."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER", "name": "Vaccine Escape", "one_liner": "A durable barrier imposed on an adaptive population acts as a selection filter, shifting the population toward variants it cannot engage, so effective coverage falls even though the barrier still works exactly as designed.", "page_ref": "prime:vaccine_escape", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Mandatory vaccine escape roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: Barrier exposure is common or sustained enough to alter population composition.", "slug": "vaccine_escape", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Its mandatory pattern requires heterogeneous barrier engagement, a durable selection differential, repeated exposure, and population-composition shift. Under legal role renaming this entails the complete atom predicate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Barrier exposure is common or sustained enough to alter population composition.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The controlled population contains meaningful variation in traits, tactics, identity, timing, channel, or susceptibility.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The controlled population contains meaningful variation in traits, tactics, identity, timing, channel, or susceptibility. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The controlled population contains meaningful variation in traits, tactics, identity, timing, channel, or susceptibility."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "The controlled population contains meaningful variation in traits, tactics, identity, timing, channel, or susceptibility."}, {"display_text": "Aggregate outcomes can improve temporarily while variant-specific effective coverage falls.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Aggregate outcomes can improve temporarily while variant-specific effective coverage falls. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Aggregate outcomes can improve temporarily while variant-specific effective coverage falls."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Aggregate outcomes can improve temporarily while variant-specific effective coverage falls."}, {"display_text": "Control layers may share target features, data, assumptions, suppliers, or implementation paths.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "target while the target becomes a smaller share of the population. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: Control layers may share target features, data, assumptions, suppliers, or implementation paths. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Control layers may share target features, data, assumptions, suppliers, or implementation paths.", "target while the target becomes a smaller share of the population."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Control layers may share target features, data, assumptions, suppliers, or implementation paths."}, {"display_text": "Monitoring can be extended to composition, not only activity counts or total incidents.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: Monitoring can be extended to composition, not only activity counts or total incidents. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Monitoring can be extended to composition, not only activity counts or total incidents."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "Monitoring can be extended to composition, not only activity counts or total incidents."}, {"display_text": "A safe path exists to diversify, renew, layer, narrow, or redesign protection without abandoning essential coverage.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: A safe path exists to diversify, renew, layer, narrow, or redesign protection without abandoning essential coverage. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A safe path exists to diversify, renew, layer, narrow, or redesign protection without abandoning essential coverage."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 8, "text": "A safe path exists to diversify, renew, layer, narrow, or redesign protection without abandoning essential coverage."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 1, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-backfill-batch-001", "ledger_sha256": "bded1ab45ccd00c90751f1a860c698f68a44daf3ba85ea9f8f0c46a396d680e4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Adaptive Capacity Building", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:adaptive_capacity_building", "slug": "adaptive_capacity_building"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 4, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 2, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 2 of 4 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a gap between possible future conditions and the system’s current ability to change. Present routines may work under present assumptions, but they do not contain enough response variety, slack, learning, modularity, authority, or practice to handle changed conditions. The danger is often invisible because the system has not yet been forced outside its familiar range.\n\nThis problem appears as brittle specialization, undocumented workarounds, thin role coverage, stale contingency plans, lack of learning carryover, or governance that punishes deviation even when conditions require adaptation. The system may look efficient while quietly losing the ability to adapt.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Diagnose latent adaptation deficits through narrow routines, concentrated burden, absent slack, or harmful past response."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any listed literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "The reconciled route preserves the final-method diagnostic relation while excluding goals, feasibility conditions, and application constraints."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Its mandatory pattern requires routines that work in their familiar regime but persistently misfit novel or shifted conditions. Under legal role renaming this entails the complete atom predicate.", "role_mapping": "Mandatory cognitive entrenchment roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: Current routines work in expected cases but degrade outside that band.", "slug": "cognitive_entrenchment", "tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b001_a15_dc_a2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Current routines work only within a narrow band of expected cases and degrade sharply outside that band. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Current routines work only within a narrow band of expected cases and degrade sharply outside that band."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER", "name": "Cognitive Entrenchment", "one_liner": "Rigid thinking patterns.", "page_ref": "prime:cognitive_entrenchment", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Mandatory cognitive entrenchment roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: Current routines work in expected cases but degrade outside that band.", "slug": "cognitive_entrenchment", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Its mandatory pattern requires routines that work in their familiar regime but persistently misfit novel or shifted conditions. Under legal role renaming this entails the complete atom predicate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Current routines work in expected cases but degrade outside that band.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Its mandatory pattern requires routines that work in their familiar regime but persistently misfit novel or shifted conditions. Under legal role renaming this entails the complete atom predicate.", "role_mapping": "Mandatory cognitive entrenchment roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: The working band is narrow and degradation outside it is sharp.", "slug": "cognitive_entrenchment", "tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b001_a15_dc_a3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Current routines work only within a narrow band of expected cases and degrade sharply outside that band. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Current routines work only within a narrow band of expected cases and degrade sharply outside that band."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER", "name": "Cognitive Entrenchment", "one_liner": "Rigid thinking patterns.", "page_ref": "prime:cognitive_entrenchment", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Mandatory cognitive entrenchment roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: The working band is narrow and degradation outside it is sharp.", "slug": "cognitive_entrenchment", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Its mandatory pattern requires routines that work in their familiar regime but persistently misfit novel or shifted conditions. Under legal role renaming this entails the complete atom predicate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The working band is narrow and degradation outside it is sharp.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any listed literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "The reconciled route preserves the final-method diagnostic relation while excluding goals, feasibility conditions, and application constraints."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The frozen retrieval audit establishes that adaptation capability concentrated in a few informal specialists is a concentrated dependency distribution.", "role_mapping": "Concentrated dependency holders -> specialists or informal heroes; dependent function -> adaptation burden.", "slug": "dependency_distribution_concentration", "tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b001_a15_dc_a4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A few specialists, informal heroes, or undocumented workarounds currently carry most adaptation burden. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A few specialists, informal heroes, or undocumented workarounds currently carry most adaptation burden."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER", "name": "Dependency Distribution Concentration", "one_liner": "How a system's dependency weight is distributed across providers — concentrated or spread — is a structural property that bounds its fragility independent of its own defenses.", "page_ref": "prime:dependency_distribution_concentration", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Concentrated dependency holders -> specialists or informal heroes; dependent function -> adaptation burden.", "slug": "dependency_distribution_concentration", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The frozen retrieval audit establishes that adaptation capability concentrated in a few informal specialists is a concentrated dependency distribution."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A few specialists, informal heroes, or undocumented workarounds carry most adaptation burden.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any listed literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "The reconciled route preserves the final-method diagnostic relation while excluding goals, feasibility conditions, and application constraints."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "This candidate does not universally preserve the atom complete with its polarity, scope, modality, and qualifiers.", "slug": "system_slack"}], "residual_id": "r:adaptive_capacity_building:b001_a15_dc_a5", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "The frozen shortlist does not universally entail this complete predicate under a legal role mapping, so the open-world remainder is preserved explicitly."}}, "condition_id": "b001_a15_dc_a5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The system runs so lean that there is little time, attention, or resource headroom for learning and change. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The system runs so lean that there is little time, attention, or resource headroom for learning and change."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "This candidate does not universally preserve the atom complete with its polarity, scope, modality, and qualifiers.", "slug": "system_slack"}], "normalized_requirement": "The system runs so lean that little time, attention, or resource headroom remains for learning and change.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "The frozen shortlist does not universally entail this complete predicate under a legal role mapping, so the open-world remainder is preserved explicitly. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The system runs so lean that little time, attention, or resource headroom remains for learning and change.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any listed literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "The reconciled route preserves the final-method diagnostic relation while excluding goals, feasibility conditions, and application constraints."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "This candidate does not universally preserve the atom complete with its polarity, scope, modality, and qualifiers.", "slug": "adaptation"}], "residual_id": "r:adaptive_capacity_building:b001_a15_dc_a6", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "The frozen shortlist does not universally entail this complete predicate under a legal role mapping, so the open-world remainder is preserved explicitly."}}, "condition_id": "b001_a15_dc_a6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Past surprises revealed that the system could eventually adapt, but only slowly, chaotically, or with avoidable harm. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Past surprises revealed that the system could eventually adapt, but only slowly, chaotically, or with avoidable harm."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "This candidate does not universally preserve the atom complete with its polarity, scope, modality, and qualifiers.", "slug": "adaptation"}], "normalized_requirement": "Past surprises showed eventual adaptation only slowly, chaotically, or with avoidable harm.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "The frozen shortlist does not universally entail this complete predicate under a legal role mapping, so the open-world remainder is preserved explicitly. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Past surprises showed eventual adaptation only slowly, chaotically, or with avoidable harm.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Future environmental, demand, risk, technological, policy, or stakeholder conditions are uncertain or likely to change.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The structural problem is a gap between possible future conditions and the system’s current ability to change. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Future environmental, demand, risk, technological, policy, or stakeholder conditions are uncertain or likely to change. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Future environmental, demand, risk, technological, policy, or stakeholder conditions are uncertain or likely to change.", "The structural problem is a gap between possible future conditions and the system’s current ability to change."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "Future environmental, demand, risk, technological, policy, or stakeholder conditions are uncertain or likely to change."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 1, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-backfill-batch-001", "ledger_sha256": "bded1ab45ccd00c90751f1a860c698f68a44daf3ba85ea9f8f0c46a396d680e4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Adaptive Gain Retuning", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:adaptive_gain_retuning", "slug": "adaptive_gain_retuning"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 2 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 2}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A fast pathway has a limited useful output range but faces changing input baselines, variances, noise levels, salience distributions, or context regimes. If its gain is fixed, it eventually becomes too sensitive, too insensitive, saturated, noisy, or unstable. If every response is recomputed manually, the pathway loses the speed and simplicity that made it useful.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A fixed-gain fast pathway faces changing input statistics and therefore clips strong inputs or silences weak ones outside its limited dynamic range."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any listed literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "The reconciled route preserves the final-method diagnostic relation while excluding goals, feasibility conditions, and application constraints."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires a deployment distribution that drifts over time from its reference along input statistics, concept, or output base rate.", "role_mapping": "Mandatory data drift roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: The fast pathway faces input statistics that change over time in level, variance, salience, demand, risk, novelty, or noise.", "slug": "data_drift", "tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b002_a01_ag_a2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The input distribution changes over time: mean level, variance, novelty, risk, demand, or background noise drifts. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The input distribution changes over time: mean level, variance, novelty, risk, demand, or background noise drifts."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER", "name": "Data Drift", "one_liner": "A static learned mapping silently loses accuracy as the deployment distribution drifts away from the distribution it was calibrated on.", "page_ref": "prime:data_drift", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Mandatory data drift roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: The fast pathway faces input statistics that change over time in level, variance, salience, demand, risk, novelty, or noise.", "slug": "data_drift", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires a deployment distribution that drifts over time from its reference along input statistics, concept, or output base rate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The fast pathway faces input statistics that change over time in level, variance, salience, demand, risk, novelty, or noise.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The record requires a limited output dynamic range and a return to a working operating point by slope retuning, which entails bounded discrimination rather than raw maximization.", "role_mapping": "Mandatory gain control roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: Useful output depends on discrimination within a bounded range rather than maximal raw response.", "slug": "gain_control", "tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b002_a01_ag_a3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Output quality depends on preserving discrimination within a bounded range rather than maximizing raw response. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Output quality depends on preserving discrimination within a bounded range rather than maximizing raw response."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER", "name": "Gain Control", "one_liner": "A slow secondary loop continuously retunes the gain of a fast forward signalling pathway so it stays in its useful range across changing input statistics.", "page_ref": "prime:gain_control", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Mandatory gain control roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: Useful output depends on discrimination within a bounded range rather than maximal raw response.", "slug": "gain_control", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The record requires a limited output dynamic range and a return to a working operating point by slope retuning, which entails bounded discrimination rather than raw maximization."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Useful output depends on discrimination within a bounded range rather than maximal raw response.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The same pathway must handle weak, ordinary, and intense inputs without constantly redesigning the pathway itself.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A fast pathway has a limited useful output range but faces changing input baselines, variances, noise levels, salience distributions, or context regimes. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: The same pathway must handle weak, ordinary, and intense inputs without constantly redesigning the pathway itself. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The same pathway must handle weak, ordinary, and intense inputs without constantly redesigning the pathway itself.", "A fast pathway has a limited useful output range but faces changing input baselines, variances, noise levels, salience distributions, or context regimes."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "The same pathway must handle weak, ordinary, and intense inputs without constantly redesigning the pathway itself."}, {"display_text": "High gain is useful for detecting faint signals but dangerous when ordinary inputs become intense or noisy.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "If its gain is fixed, it eventually becomes too sensitive, too insensitive, saturated, noisy, or unstable. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: High gain is useful for detecting faint signals but dangerous when ordinary inputs become intense or noisy. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["High gain is useful for detecting faint signals but dangerous when ordinary inputs become intense or noisy.", "If its gain is fixed, it eventually becomes too sensitive, too insensitive, saturated, noisy, or unstable."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "High gain is useful for detecting faint signals but dangerous when ordinary inputs become intense or noisy."}, {"display_text": "Low gain is useful for safety or noise filtering but dangerous when weak but important signals matter.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A fast pathway has a limited useful output range but faces changing input baselines, variances, noise levels, salience distributions, or context regimes. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: Low gain is useful for safety or noise filtering but dangerous when weak but important signals matter. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Low gain is useful for safety or noise filtering but dangerous when weak but important signals matter.", "A fast pathway has a limited useful output range but faces changing input baselines, variances, noise levels, salience distributions, or context regimes."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Low gain is useful for safety or noise filtering but dangerous when weak but important signals matter."}, {"display_text": "The adjustment should be slower than the fast path so ordinary action continues, but fast enough to track regime change.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The fast pathway needs stable, simple, timely response rules, but the world changes enough that a single fixed sensitivity cannot remain appropriate. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: The adjustment should be slower than the fast path so ordinary action continues, but fast enough to track regime change. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The adjustment should be slower than the fast path so ordinary action continues, but fast enough to track regime change.", "The fast pathway needs stable, simple, timely response rules, but the world changes enough that a single fixed sensitivity cannot remain appropriate."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The adjustment should be slower than the fast path so ordinary action continues, but fast enough to track regime change."}, {"display_text": "Operators can observe recent statistics or output occupancy well enough to infer gain drift.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: Operators can observe recent statistics or output occupancy well enough to infer gain drift. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Operators can observe recent statistics or output occupancy well enough to infer gain drift."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "Operators can observe recent statistics or output occupancy well enough to infer gain drift."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 2, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-backfill-batch-002", "ledger_sha256": "6899dd091c14c0708df9defc1f56e7467ac4733c0fb180c9451872c71a970ee0"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Adaptive Mutation Rate Management", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:adaptive_mutation_rate_management", "slug": "adaptive_mutation_rate_management"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 3, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 3 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 1 of 3 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system is trying to improve, learn, search, innovate, or adapt, but the amount of variation it introduces is misaligned with the current state. Too little variation produces premature convergence, homogeneity, local optimum lock-in, groupthink, or fragile overfitting. Too much variation produces noise, instability, lost learning, high evaluation cost, safety risk, or endless churn. A fixed variation rate cannot fit all phases, subunits, or uncertainty regimes.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "The amount of deliberately introduced variation is misaligned: convergence or homogenization shows too little exploration, or candidate production outruns evaluation capacity."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any listed literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "The reconciled route preserves the final-method diagnostic relation while excluding goals, feasibility conditions, and application constraints."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid controlled-variation process can generate diverse candidates and improve through selection, so repeated similar non-improvement is false.", "slug": "variation_strategies"}], "residual_id": "r:adaptive_mutation_rate_management:b002_a02_am_a1", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "The shortlist does not require repeated convergence, similarity of outputs, and absence of meaningful improvement together."}}, "condition_id": "b002_a02_am_a1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Candidate solutions, strategies, designs, or behaviors repeatedly converge on similar forms without meaningful improvement. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Candidate solutions, strategies, designs, or behaviors repeatedly converge on similar forms without meaningful improvement."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid controlled-variation process can generate diverse candidates and improve through selection, so repeated similar non-improvement is false.", "slug": "variation_strategies"}], "normalized_requirement": "Candidate solutions repeatedly converge on similar forms without meaningful improvement.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "The shortlist does not require repeated convergence, similarity of outputs, and absence of meaningful improvement together. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Candidate solutions repeatedly converge on similar forms without meaningful improvement.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any listed literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "The reconciled route preserves the final-method diagnostic relation while excluding goals, feasibility conditions, and application constraints."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The frozen retrieval audit establishes evaluation capacity as the limiting stage when candidate variation arrives faster than it can be meaningfully assessed.", "role_mapping": "Limiting stage -> evaluation capacity; flow -> generated variants.", "slug": "bottleneck", "tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b002_a02_am_a5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Evaluation capacity is limited and variation creates more candidates than can be meaningfully assessed. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Evaluation capacity is limited and variation creates more candidates than can be meaningfully assessed."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER", "name": "Bottleneck", "one_liner": "The single limiting stage that caps an entire system's throughput.", "page_ref": "prime:bottleneck", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Limiting stage -> evaluation capacity; flow -> generated variants.", "slug": "bottleneck", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The frozen retrieval audit establishes evaluation capacity as the limiting stage when candidate variation arrives faster than it can be meaningfully assessed."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Variation creates more candidates than limited evaluation capacity can meaningfully assess.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any listed literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "The reconciled route preserves the final-method diagnostic relation while excluding goals, feasibility conditions, and application constraints."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid variation strategy may preserve and compare many alternatives without any homogenization pressure, so the premature-elimination predicate is false.", "slug": "variation_strategies"}], "residual_id": "r:adaptive_mutation_rate_management:b002_a02_am_a6", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No shortlisted definition requires premature loss of option diversity specifically before comparison can occur."}}, "condition_id": "b002_a02_am_a6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Homogenization pressure is eliminating option diversity before alternatives can be compared. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Homogenization pressure is eliminating option diversity before alternatives can be compared."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid variation strategy may preserve and compare many alternatives without any homogenization pressure, so the premature-elimination predicate is false.", "slug": "variation_strategies"}], "normalized_requirement": "Homogenization pressure eliminates option diversity before alternatives can be compared.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "No shortlisted definition requires premature loss of option diversity specifically before comparison can occur. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Homogenization pressure eliminates option diversity before alternatives can be compared.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "DISJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The environment, objective, or constraint set is uncertain or changing.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The environment, objective, or constraint set is uncertain or changing. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The environment, objective, or constraint set is uncertain or changing."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "The environment, objective, or constraint set is uncertain or changing."}, {"display_text": "Performance is improving but instability, incompatibility, safety risk, or cost is increasing.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Too much variation produces noise, instability, lost learning, high evaluation cost, safety risk, or endless churn. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Performance is improving but instability, incompatibility, safety risk, or cost is increasing. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Performance is improving but instability, incompatibility, safety risk, or cost is increasing.", "Too much variation produces noise, instability, lost learning, high evaluation cost, safety risk, or endless churn."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Performance is improving but instability, incompatibility, safety risk, or cost is increasing."}, {"display_text": "Different subunits face different maturity, risk, or uncertainty levels.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A fixed variation rate cannot fit all phases, subunits, or uncertainty regimes. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Different subunits face different maturity, risk, or uncertainty levels. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Different subunits face different maturity, risk, or uncertainty levels.", "A fixed variation rate cannot fit all phases, subunits, or uncertainty regimes."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Different subunits face different maturity, risk, or uncertainty levels."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 2, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-backfill-batch-002", "ledger_sha256": "6899dd091c14c0708df9defc1f56e7467ac4733c0fb180c9451872c71a970ee0"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Adaptive Opponent Rehearsal", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:adaptive_opponent_rehearsal", "slug": "adaptive_opponent_rehearsal"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 2 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 2}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A focal plan is evaluated as though the environment will absorb it without strategic response. Hidden assumptions about opponent passivity, information asymmetry, escalation, incentives, timing, coordination, and countermeasure availability remain invisible until real deployment, where an adaptive opponent can exploit them faster than the plan owner can revise the plan.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A plan rests on passive or static assumptions even though an adaptive opponent can respond sequentially or has relevant attributes outside those assumptions."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any listed literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "The reconciled route preserves the final-method diagnostic relation while excluding goals, feasibility conditions, and application constraints."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record mandates an adaptive adversary role that observes the protagonist's move and chooses its own response.", "role_mapping": "Mandatory wargaming roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: The plan concerns an opponent or hostile environment that observes a move and can adapt its response.", "slug": "wargaming", "tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b002_a03_ao_a1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The plan affects or threatens actors that can observe, learn, adapt, retaliate, evade, spoof, delay, arbitrage, manipulate, or coordinate against it. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The plan affects or threatens actors that can observe, learn, adapt, retaliate, evade, spoof, delay, arbitrage, manipulate, or coordinate against it."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER", "name": "Wargaming", "one_liner": "Rehearse a plan against an adaptive opponent, turn by turn, to surface the assumptions it hid.", "page_ref": "prime:wargaming", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Mandatory wargaming roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: The plan concerns an opponent or hostile environment that observes a move and can adapt its response.", "slug": "wargaming", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record mandates an adaptive adversary role that observes the protagonist's move and chooses its own response."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The plan concerns an opponent or hostile environment that observes a move and can adapt its response.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid wargame may be commissioned by already skeptical decision-makers using several dynamic analyses, so the stated approval temptation is absent.", "slug": "wargaming"}], "residual_id": "r:adaptive_opponent_rehearsal:b002_a03_ao_a2", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No shortlisted record requires the plan approvers' temptation toward one-path, static, optimistic, or compliance-assumption reasoning."}}, "condition_id": "b002_a03_ao_a2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Decision-makers are tempted to approve the plan based on one-path reasoning, static scenarios, optimistic forecasts, or compliance assumptions. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Decision-makers are tempted to approve the plan based on one-path reasoning, static scenarios, optimistic forecasts, or compliance assumptions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid wargame may be commissioned by already skeptical decision-makers using several dynamic analyses, so the stated approval temptation is absent.", "slug": "wargaming"}], "normalized_requirement": "Decision-makers are tempted to approve the plan through one-path, static, optimistic, or compliance-based reasoning.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "No shortlisted record requires the plan approvers' temptation toward one-path, static, optimistic, or compliance-assumption reasoning. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Decision-makers are tempted to approve the plan through one-path, static, optimistic, or compliance-based reasoning.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Failure would be costly enough that live trial-and-error is unacceptable, but the plan is concrete enough to simulate contested interaction.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The plan must be rehearsed enough to reveal adaptive responses without pretending the rehearsal can fully predict reality. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: Failure would be costly enough that live trial-and-error is unacceptable, but the plan is concrete enough to simulate contested interaction. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Failure would be costly enough that live trial-and-error is unacceptable, but the plan is concrete enough to simulate contested interaction.", "The plan must be rehearsed enough to reveal adaptive responses without pretending the rehearsal can fully predict reality."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Failure would be costly enough that live trial-and-error is unacceptable, but the plan is concrete enough to simulate contested interaction."}, {"display_text": "The relevant opponent has goals, resources, incentives, information, constraints, or tempo that differ from the plan owner’s assumptions.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Hidden assumptions about opponent passivity, information asymmetry, escalation, incentives, timing, coordination, and countermeasure availability remain invisible until real deployment, where an adaptive opponent can exploit them faster than the plan owner can revise the plan. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The relevant opponent has goals, resources, incentives, information, constraints, or tempo that differ from the plan owner’s assumptions. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The relevant opponent has goals, resources, incentives, information, constraints, or tempo that differ from the plan owner’s assumptions.", "Hidden assumptions about opponent passivity, information asymmetry, escalation, incentives, timing, coordination, and countermeasure availability remain invisible until real deployment, where an adaptive opponent can exploit them faster than the plan owner can revise the plan."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The relevant opponent has goals, resources, incentives, information, constraints, or tempo that differ from the plan owner’s assumptions."}, {"display_text": "Sequential interaction matters: one move changes what the next actor knows, can do, wants, or is willing to risk.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Sequential interaction matters: one move changes what the next actor knows, can do, wants, or is willing to risk. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Sequential interaction matters: one move changes what the next actor knows, can do, wants, or is willing to risk."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Sequential interaction matters: one move changes what the next actor knows, can do, wants, or is willing to risk."}, {"display_text": "Institutional pressure discourages open challenge, dissent, or exploration of how the plan could be defeated.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: Institutional pressure discourages open challenge, dissent, or exploration of how the plan could be defeated. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Institutional pressure discourages open challenge, dissent, or exploration of how the plan could be defeated."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Institutional pressure discourages open challenge, dissent, or exploration of how the plan could be defeated."}, {"display_text": "The plan requires stage-gate approval, launch readiness, security hardening, crisis preparedness, or strategic commitment before real-world exposure.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The plan owner needs to commit under uncertainty, but adversarial and strategic environments make commitment itself a signal that changes the environment. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: The plan requires stage-gate approval, launch readiness, security hardening, crisis preparedness, or strategic commitment before real-world exposure. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The plan requires stage-gate approval, launch readiness, security hardening, crisis preparedness, or strategic commitment before real-world exposure.", "The plan owner needs to commit under uncertainty, but adversarial and strategic environments make commitment itself a signal that changes the environment."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "The plan requires stage-gate approval, launch readiness, security hardening, crisis preparedness, or strategic commitment before real-world exposure."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 2, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-backfill-batch-002", "ledger_sha256": "6899dd091c14c0708df9defc1f56e7467ac4733c0fb180c9451872c71a970ee0"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Adaptive Precision-Weighted Signal Fusion", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:adaptive_precision_weighted_signal_fusion", "slug": "adaptive_precision_weighted_signal_fusion"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 4, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 5 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 4 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system has several signals about the same underlying quantity but lacks an explicit, context-sensitive reliability weighting layer. Signals may be averaged equally, ranked by salience, trusted by authority, chosen by convenience, or manually reconciled without recording why one should count more than another. As contexts shift, old weights persist, correlated sources masquerade as independent evidence, noisy channels dominate because they are plentiful, and downstream decisions inherit a fused estimate whose precision is overstated or opaque.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Several signals about one target have unequal or shifting reliability, yet their fusion is misweighted or opaque and therefore overstates or degrades the resulting estimate."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any listed literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "The reconciled route preserves the final-method diagnostic relation while excluding goals, feasibility conditions, and application constraints."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The record mandates multiple signals about one shared underlying quantity.", "role_mapping": "Mandatory precision weighting roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: Two or more imperfect signals point to the same latent quantity, state, risk, construct, or outcome.", "slug": "precision_weighting", "tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The exact record requires multiple parallel noisy cues bearing on one single latent quantity.", "role_mapping": "Mandatory bayesian cue integration roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: Two or more imperfect signals point to the same latent quantity, state, risk, construct, or outcome.", "slug": "bayesian_cue_integration", "tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b002_a04_ap_a1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Two or more measurements, cues, sensors, raters, sources, models, forecasts, proxies, or indicators point to the same latent quantity, state, risk, construct, or outcome. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Two or more measurements, cues, sensors, raters, sources, models, forecasts, proxies, or indicators point to the same latent quantity, state, risk, construct, or outcome."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER", "name": "Precision Weighting", "one_liner": "Signals about the same latent quantity receive influence in proportion to estimated precision, so more reliable evidence contributes more while context may revise the weights.", "page_ref": "prime:precision_weighting", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Mandatory precision weighting roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: Two or more imperfect signals point to the same latent quantity, state, risk, construct, or outcome.", "slug": "precision_weighting", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The record mandates multiple signals about one shared underlying quantity."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER", "name": "Bayesian Cue Integration", "one_liner": "Multiple noisy cues to one quantity combine by inverse-variance weighting into a lower-variance estimate.", "page_ref": "prime:bayesian_cue_integration", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Mandatory bayesian cue integration roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: Two or more imperfect signals point to the same latent quantity, state, risk, construct, or outcome.", "slug": "bayesian_cue_integration", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires multiple parallel noisy cues bearing on one single latent quantity."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Two or more imperfect signals point to the same latent quantity, state, risk, construct, or outcome.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid precision-weighting calculation can combine equally precise, equally calibrated, equally recent independent signals with identical coverage and context fit.", "slug": "precision_weighting"}], "residual_id": "r:adaptive_precision_weighted_signal_fusion:b002_a04_ap_a2", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "The candidate records permit equal reliability and do not require a difference along any of the source's listed dimensions."}}, "condition_id": "b002_a04_ap_a2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Signals differ in measurement uncertainty, historical accuracy, calibration status, recency, bias, coverage, independence, or context fit. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Signals differ in measurement uncertainty, historical accuracy, calibration status, recency, bias, coverage, independence, or context fit."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid precision-weighting calculation can combine equally precise, equally calibrated, equally recent independent signals with identical coverage and context fit.", "slug": "precision_weighting"}], "normalized_requirement": "The signals differ in uncertainty, accuracy, calibration, recency, bias, coverage, independence, or context fit.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "The candidate records permit equal reliability and do not require a difference along any of the source's listed dimensions. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The signals differ in uncertainty, accuracy, calibration, recency, bias, coverage, independence, or context fit.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any listed literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "The reconciled route preserves the final-method diagnostic relation while excluding goals, feasibility conditions, and application constraints."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The record mandates multiple signals about one shared underlying quantity.", "role_mapping": "Mandatory precision weighting roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: Two or more imperfect signals point to the same latent quantity, state, risk, construct, or outcome.", "slug": "precision_weighting", "tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The exact record requires multiple parallel noisy cues bearing on one single latent quantity.", "role_mapping": "Mandatory bayesian cue integration roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: Two or more imperfect signals point to the same latent quantity, state, risk, construct, or outcome.", "slug": "bayesian_cue_integration", "tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b002_a04_ap_a1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Two or more measurements, cues, sensors, raters, sources, models, forecasts, proxies, or indicators point to the same latent quantity, state, risk, construct, or outcome. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Two or more measurements, cues, sensors, raters, sources, models, forecasts, proxies, or indicators point to the same latent quantity, state, risk, construct, or outcome."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER", "name": "Precision Weighting", "one_liner": "Signals about the same latent quantity receive influence in proportion to estimated precision, so more reliable evidence contributes more while context may revise the weights.", "page_ref": "prime:precision_weighting", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Mandatory precision weighting roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: Two or more imperfect signals point to the same latent quantity, state, risk, construct, or outcome.", "slug": "precision_weighting", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The record mandates multiple signals about one shared underlying quantity."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER", "name": "Bayesian Cue Integration", "one_liner": "Multiple noisy cues to one quantity combine by inverse-variance weighting into a lower-variance estimate.", "page_ref": "prime:bayesian_cue_integration", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Mandatory bayesian cue integration roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: Two or more imperfect signals point to the same latent quantity, state, risk, construct, or outcome.", "slug": "bayesian_cue_integration", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires multiple parallel noisy cues bearing on one single latent quantity."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Two or more imperfect signals point to the same latent quantity, state, risk, construct, or outcome.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact record permits a source's precision to remain fixed for a calculation and across conditions; a stable calibrated sensor is a valid counterexample.", "slug": "precision_weighting"}], "residual_id": "r:adaptive_precision_weighted_signal_fusion:b002_a04_ap_a4", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Contextual revision is optional in the closest record, so no shortlisted prime requires reliability itself to change across a listed context."}}, "condition_id": "b002_a04_ap_a4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The reliability of a signal changes across regime, population, range, environment, workload, adversarial pressure, instrument condition, or model drift. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The reliability of a signal changes across regime, population, range, environment, workload, adversarial pressure, instrument condition, or model drift."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact record permits a source's precision to remain fixed for a calculation and across conditions; a stable calibrated sensor is a valid counterexample.", "slug": "precision_weighting"}], "normalized_requirement": "A signal's reliability changes across regime, population, range, environment, workload, adversarial pressure, instrument condition, or model drift.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Contextual revision is optional in the closest record, so no shortlisted prime requires reliability itself to change across a listed context. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A signal's reliability changes across regime, population, range, environment, workload, adversarial pressure, instrument condition, or model drift.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any listed literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "The reconciled route preserves the final-method diagnostic relation while excluding goals, feasibility conditions, and application constraints."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The record mandates multiple signals about one shared underlying quantity.", "role_mapping": "Mandatory precision weighting roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: Two or more imperfect signals point to the same latent quantity, state, risk, construct, or outcome.", "slug": "precision_weighting", "tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The exact record requires multiple parallel noisy cues bearing on one single latent quantity.", "role_mapping": "Mandatory bayesian cue integration roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: Two or more imperfect signals point to the same latent quantity, state, risk, construct, or outcome.", "slug": "bayesian_cue_integration", "tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b002_a04_ap_a1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Two or more measurements, cues, sensors, raters, sources, models, forecasts, proxies, or indicators point to the same latent quantity, state, risk, construct, or outcome. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Two or more measurements, cues, sensors, raters, sources, models, forecasts, proxies, or indicators point to the same latent quantity, state, risk, construct, or outcome."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER", "name": "Precision Weighting", "one_liner": "Signals about the same latent quantity receive influence in proportion to estimated precision, so more reliable evidence contributes more while context may revise the weights.", "page_ref": "prime:precision_weighting", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Mandatory precision weighting roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: Two or more imperfect signals point to the same latent quantity, state, risk, construct, or outcome.", "slug": "precision_weighting", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The record mandates multiple signals about one shared underlying quantity."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER", "name": "Bayesian Cue Integration", "one_liner": "Multiple noisy cues to one quantity combine by inverse-variance weighting into a lower-variance estimate.", "page_ref": "prime:bayesian_cue_integration", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Mandatory bayesian cue integration roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: Two or more imperfect signals point to the same latent quantity, state, risk, construct, or outcome.", "slug": "bayesian_cue_integration", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires multiple parallel noisy cues bearing on one single latent quantity."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Two or more imperfect signals point to the same latent quantity, state, risk, construct, or outcome.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid precision-weighted fusion uses reliability-proportional weights and can avoid every enumerated simple rule and overweighting failure.", "slug": "precision_weighting"}], "residual_id": "r:adaptive_precision_weighted_signal_fusion:b002_a04_ap_a5", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "The shortlist does not universally entail this prospective failure of the enumerated simple fusion rules and evidence defects."}}, "condition_id": "b002_a04_ap_a5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Simple averaging, majority voting, dashboard salience, or highest-confidence selection would overweight weak, duplicated, stale, biased, or noisy evidence. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Simple averaging, majority voting, dashboard salience, or highest-confidence selection would overweight weak, duplicated, stale, biased, or noisy evidence."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid precision-weighted fusion uses reliability-proportional weights and can avoid every enumerated simple rule and overweighting failure.", "slug": "precision_weighting"}], "normalized_requirement": "Simple averaging, voting, salience, or highest-confidence selection would overweight weak, duplicated, stale, biased, or noisy evidence.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "The shortlist does not universally entail this prospective failure of the enumerated simple fusion rules and evidence defects. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Simple averaging, voting, salience, or highest-confidence selection would overweight weak, duplicated, stale, biased, or noisy evidence.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any listed literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "The reconciled route preserves the final-method diagnostic relation while excluding goals, feasibility conditions, and application constraints."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The record mandates multiple signals about one shared underlying quantity.", "role_mapping": "Mandatory precision weighting roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: Two or more imperfect signals point to the same latent quantity, state, risk, construct, or outcome.", "slug": "precision_weighting", "tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The exact record requires multiple parallel noisy cues bearing on one single latent quantity.", "role_mapping": "Mandatory bayesian cue integration roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: Two or more imperfect signals point to the same latent quantity, state, risk, construct, or outcome.", "slug": "bayesian_cue_integration", "tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b002_a04_ap_a1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Two or more measurements, cues, sensors, raters, sources, models, forecasts, proxies, or indicators point to the same latent quantity, state, risk, construct, or outcome. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Two or more measurements, cues, sensors, raters, sources, models, forecasts, proxies, or indicators point to the same latent quantity, state, risk, construct, or outcome."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER", "name": "Precision Weighting", "one_liner": "Signals about the same latent quantity receive influence in proportion to estimated precision, so more reliable evidence contributes more while context may revise the weights.", "page_ref": "prime:precision_weighting", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Mandatory precision weighting roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: Two or more imperfect signals point to the same latent quantity, state, risk, construct, or outcome.", "slug": "precision_weighting", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The record mandates multiple signals about one shared underlying quantity."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER", "name": "Bayesian Cue Integration", "one_liner": "Multiple noisy cues to one quantity combine by inverse-variance weighting into a lower-variance estimate.", "page_ref": "prime:bayesian_cue_integration", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Mandatory bayesian cue integration roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: Two or more imperfect signals point to the same latent quantity, state, risk, construct, or outcome.", "slug": "bayesian_cue_integration", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires multiple parallel noisy cues bearing on one single latent quantity."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Two or more imperfect signals point to the same latent quantity, state, risk, construct, or outcome.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid implementation can publish each precision estimate, its update policy, and resulting uncertainty, making all three opacity claims false.", "slug": "precision_weighting"}], "residual_id": "r:adaptive_precision_weighted_signal_fusion:b002_a04_ap_a6", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No shortlisted record requires an existing rule plus opacity about weight rationale, expiration, or residual uncertainty."}}, "condition_id": "b002_a04_ap_a6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: An existing fusion rule exists but no one can explain how the weights were chosen, when they expire, or what uncertainty remains. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["An existing fusion rule exists but no one can explain how the weights were chosen, when they expire, or what uncertainty remains."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid implementation can publish each precision estimate, its update policy, and resulting uncertainty, making all three opacity claims false.", "slug": "precision_weighting"}], "normalized_requirement": "An existing fusion rule has weights whose choice, expiry, or remaining uncertainty cannot be explained.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "No shortlisted record requires an existing rule plus opacity about weight rationale, expiration, or residual uncertainty. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "An existing fusion rule has weights whose choice, expiry, or remaining uncertainty cannot be explained.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A decision requires one usable estimate, ranking, confidence state, action route, or threshold judgment from several imperfect inputs.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "As contexts shift, old weights persist, correlated sources masquerade as independent evidence, noisy channels dominate because they are plentiful, and downstream decisions inherit a fused estimate whose precision is overstated or opaque. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: A decision requires one usable estimate, ranking, confidence state, action route, or threshold judgment from several imperfect inputs. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A decision requires one usable estimate, ranking, confidence state, action route, or threshold judgment from several imperfect inputs.", "As contexts shift, old weights persist, correlated sources masquerade as independent evidence, noisy channels dominate because they are plentiful, and downstream decisions inherit a fused estimate whose precision is overstated or opaque."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "A decision requires one usable estimate, ranking, confidence state, action route, or threshold judgment from several imperfect inputs."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 2, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-backfill-batch-002", "ledger_sha256": "6899dd091c14c0708df9defc1f56e7467ac4733c0fb180c9451872c71a970ee0"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Adaptive Reconfiguration", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:adaptive_reconfiguration", "slug": "adaptive_reconfiguration"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 2 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 2}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is second-order failure. First-order controls still exist, but they no longer preserve viability. The system may be measuring the right thing and responding according to established rules, yet those rules, roles, or pathways are no longer enough.\n\nThis produces a painful tension: pushing the old controls harder delays necessary adaptation, but changing the configuration can break coordination and safety. The system therefore needs a governed way to decide when the old configuration has failed and how to change it without dissolving accountability.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A changed operating regime has rendered ordinary controls ineffective within the current configuration."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any listed literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "The reconciled route preserves the final-method diagnostic relation while excluding goals, feasibility conditions, and application constraints."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid ultra-stable system can have effective first-order controls while its second-order regulator preserves bounds against additional perturbations.", "slug": "ultra_stability_ashby_s_concept"}], "residual_id": "r:adaptive_reconfiguration:b002_a05_ar_a1", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "The closest shortlist record requires multilevel regulation but does not require ordinary controls to be currently saturated or ineffective."}}, "condition_id": "b002_a05_ar_a1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when ordinary control keeps failing despite reasonable correction. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Ordinary controls are saturated or ineffective.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Ordinary controls are saturated or ineffective", "Use this archetype when ordinary control keeps failing despite reasonable correction."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid ultra-stable system can have effective first-order controls while its second-order regulator preserves bounds against additional perturbations.", "slug": "ultra_stability_ashby_s_concept"}], "normalized_requirement": "Ordinary controls are saturated or ineffective.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "The closest shortlist record requires multilevel regulation but does not require ordinary controls to be currently saturated or ineffective. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Ordinary controls are saturated or ineffective.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires sustained environmental or problem change that reduces the fit of the prior configuration.", "role_mapping": "Mandatory adaptation roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: The operating regime has changed.", "slug": "adaptation", "tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b002_a05_ar_a2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The key condition is a demonstrated mismatch between the existing control regime and the changed environment. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The operating regime has changed.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The operating regime has changed", "The key condition is a demonstrated mismatch between the existing control regime and the changed environment."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER", "name": "Adaptation", "one_liner": "Systems adjust to conditions.", "page_ref": "prime:adaptation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Mandatory adaptation roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: The operating regime has changed.", "slug": "adaptation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires sustained environmental or problem change that reduces the fit of the prior configuration."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The operating regime has changed.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Critical function must continue or be restored in a new form.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when critical function must continue, but not necessarily in the old form. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: Critical function must continue or be restored in a new form. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Critical function must continue or be restored in a new form", "It is especially useful when critical function must continue, but not necessarily in the old form."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Critical function must continue or be restored in a new form"}, {"display_text": "A higher-level adaptation authority or process exists.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: A higher-level adaptation authority or process exists. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A higher-level adaptation authority or process exists"]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "A higher-level adaptation authority or process exists"}, {"display_text": "Reconfiguration is possible without destroying viability.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: Reconfiguration is possible without destroying viability. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Reconfiguration is possible without destroying viability"]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Reconfiguration is possible without destroying viability"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 2, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-backfill-batch-002", "ledger_sha256": "6899dd091c14c0708df9defc1f56e7467ac4733c0fb180c9451872c71a970ee0"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Adaptive Response Recalibration", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:adaptive_response_recalibration", "slug": "adaptive_response_recalibration"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 4, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 4 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 1 of 4 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a stale mapping between state and action. The system sees a condition and applies a response that was designed for a different state of the world. Because the response rule is often habitual, formalized, automated, or socially defended, it may continue long after its assumptions have expired.\n\nThe visible symptoms are misfit: more exceptions, more informal workarounds, worse timing, repeated side effects, growing complaints, false alarms, missed cases, subgroup harms, or declining performance after an environmental change. The old response may still look legitimate because it once worked. The question is whether it still fits now.\n\nThe root tension is stability versus adaptation. Stable rules make systems reliable, teachable, auditable, and fair. But stable rules can become rigid when conditions shift. The archetype solves this by changing the response rule in a bounded, evidence-guided way rather than abandoning rule-governed behavior.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A response rule that fit earlier conditions no longer fits the current state or evidence."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any listed literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "The reconciled route preserves the final-method diagnostic relation while excluding goals, feasibility conditions, and application constraints."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires direct improvement followed by an intervention-changed condition and an induced response that erodes the realized gain.", "role_mapping": "Mandatory counterresponse offset roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: A previously effective response produces declining performance, new harms, or avoidable delay after conditions change.", "slug": "counterresponse_offset", "tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b002_a06_rr_a1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A previously effective response produces declining performance, new harms, or avoidable delays after conditions change. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A previously effective response produces declining performance, new harms, or avoidable delays after conditions change."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER", "name": "Counterresponse Offset", "one_liner": "An intervention improves a target but changes a coupled incentive, exposure, or behavior in a way that induces a counterresponse which erodes part or all of the intended aggregate gain.", "page_ref": "prime:counterresponse_offset", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Mandatory counterresponse offset roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: A previously effective response produces declining performance, new harms, or avoidable delay after conditions change.", "slug": "counterresponse_offset", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires direct improvement followed by an intervention-changed condition and an induced response that erodes the realized gain."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A previously effective response produces declining performance, new harms, or avoidable delay after conditions change.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any listed literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "The reconciled route preserves the final-method diagnostic relation while excluding goals, feasibility conditions, and application constraints."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid offset can arise from one intervention in one state through a coupled behavior change, without the same rule being applied across distinct states.", "slug": "counterresponse_offset"}], "residual_id": "r:adaptive_response_recalibration:b002_a06_rr_a2", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No shortlisted definition requires one unchanged rule to span states that now demand different response choices."}}, "condition_id": "b002_a06_rr_a2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The structural problem is a stale mapping between state and action. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The same rule is applied across states that now require different actions, intensities, timing, or escalation choices.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The same rule is applied across states that now require different actions, intensities, timing, or escalation choices.", "The structural problem is a stale mapping between state and action."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid offset can arise from one intervention in one state through a coupled behavior change, without the same rule being applied across distinct states.", "slug": "counterresponse_offset"}], "normalized_requirement": "The same rule is applied across states that now require different actions, intensities, timing, or escalation choices.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "No shortlisted definition requires one unchanged rule to span states that now demand different response choices. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The same rule is applied across states that now require different actions, intensities, timing, or escalation choices.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any listed literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "The reconciled route preserves the final-method diagnostic relation while excluding goals, feasibility conditions, and application constraints."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid measured offset can erode aggregate gain without complaints, exceptions, false alarms, missed cases, side effects, or workarounds.", "slug": "counterresponse_offset"}], "residual_id": "r:adaptive_response_recalibration:b002_a06_rr_a3", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "The shortlist does not mandate any enumerated manifestation as evidence that a current response has lost fit."}}, "condition_id": "b002_a06_rr_a3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The visible symptoms are misfit: more exceptions, more informal workarounds, worse timing, repeated side effects, growing complaints, false alarms, missed cases, subgroup harms, or declining performance after an environmental change. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Exceptions, complaints, side effects, false alarms, missed cases, or workarounds reveal that the current response no longer fits.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Exceptions, complaints, side effects, false alarms, missed cases, or workarounds reveal that the current response no longer fits.", "The visible symptoms are misfit: more exceptions, more informal workarounds, worse timing, repeated side effects, growing complaints, false alarms, missed cases, subgroup harms, or declining performance after an environmental change."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid measured offset can erode aggregate gain without complaints, exceptions, false alarms, missed cases, side effects, or workarounds.", "slug": "counterresponse_offset"}], "normalized_requirement": "Exceptions, complaints, side effects, false alarms, missed cases, or workarounds reveal that the current response no longer fits.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "The shortlist does not mandate any enumerated manifestation as evidence that a current response has lost fit. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Exceptions, complaints, side effects, false alarms, missed cases, or workarounds reveal that the current response no longer fits.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any listed literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "The reconciled route preserves the final-method diagnostic relation while excluding goals, feasibility conditions, and application constraints."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid offset can follow a known coupled incentive response with no new evidence and no revision of the assumptions used to choose the rule.", "slug": "counterresponse_offset"}], "residual_id": "r:adaptive_response_recalibration:b002_a06_rr_a4", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No shortlisted record requires new evidence to alter the original response-selection assumptions."}}, "condition_id": "b002_a06_rr_a4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Because the response rule is often habitual, formalized, automated, or socially defended, it may continue long after its assumptions have expired. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: New evidence changes the assumptions under which the response rule was originally chosen.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["New evidence changes the assumptions under which the response rule was originally chosen.", "Because the response rule is often habitual, formalized, automated, or socially defended, it may continue long after its assumptions have expired."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid offset can follow a known coupled incentive response with no new evidence and no revision of the assumptions used to choose the rule.", "slug": "counterresponse_offset"}], "normalized_requirement": "New evidence changes the assumptions under which the response rule was originally chosen.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "No shortlisted record requires new evidence to alter the original response-selection assumptions. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "New evidence changes the assumptions under which the response rule was originally chosen.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "DISJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 2, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-backfill-batch-002", "ledger_sha256": "6899dd091c14c0708df9defc1f56e7467ac4733c0fb180c9451872c71a970ee0"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Adaptive Scheduling", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:adaptive_scheduling", "slug": "adaptive_scheduling"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 2, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 2 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 2 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 2}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a mismatch between a fixed plan and a changing system. Tasks, resources, priorities, and constraints vary over time, but the schedule remains rigid or changes through informal improvisation.\n\nThis creates a characteristic tension. Stability is necessary because people and systems coordinate around commitments. Flexibility is also necessary because obsolete commitments can become unsafe, wasteful, unfair, or impossible. Adaptive Scheduling resolves this tension by distinguishing legitimate schedule revision from arbitrary churn.\n\nTypical symptoms include late work despite high effort, overbooked resources beside idle resources, emergency work displacing planned work without rationale, repeated renegotiation of commitments, and downstream surprises caused by silent local schedule changes.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A schedule has become infeasible or unreliable because dependencies shift or changes appear only as surprise and repeated renegotiation."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any listed literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "The reconciled route preserves the final-method diagnostic relation while excluding goals, feasibility conditions, and application constraints."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid job-shop schedule can satisfy immutable precedence relations and resource windows, with no shifted dependency or infeasibility.", "slug": "scheduling"}], "residual_id": "r:adaptive_scheduling:b002_a07_as_a4", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "The scheduling definition includes precedence constraints but does not require them to shift or make an existing plan infeasible."}}, "condition_id": "b002_a07_as_a4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Dependencies shift, causing planned handoffs, start times, or resource windows to become infeasible. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Dependencies shift, causing planned handoffs, start times, or resource windows to become infeasible."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid job-shop schedule can satisfy immutable precedence relations and resource windows, with no shifted dependency or infeasibility.", "slug": "scheduling"}], "normalized_requirement": "Dependency shifts make planned handoffs, start times, or resource windows infeasible.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "The scheduling definition includes precedence constraints but does not require them to shift or make an existing plan infeasible. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Dependency shifts make planned handoffs, start times, or resource windows infeasible.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any listed literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "The reconciled route preserves the final-method diagnostic relation while excluding goals, feasibility conditions, and application constraints."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid change notification gives named dependents actionable advance warning and lead time, so the change is neither silent nor a surprise.", "slug": "change_notification"}], "residual_id": "r:adaptive_scheduling:b002_a07_as_a5", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No shortlisted record requires the affected stakeholders to experience silence, surprise delay, or repeated renegotiation."}}, "condition_id": "b002_a07_as_a5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Typical symptoms include late work despite high effort, overbooked resources beside idle resources, emergency work displacing planned work without rationale, repeated renegotiation of commitments, and downstream surprises caused by silent local schedule changes. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Stakeholders experience silent schedule changes, surprise delays, or repeated renegotiation.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders experience silent schedule changes, surprise delays, or repeated renegotiation.", "Typical symptoms include late work despite high effort, overbooked resources beside idle resources, emergency work displacing planned work without rationale, repeated renegotiation of commitments, and downstream surprises caused by silent local schedule changes."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid change notification gives named dependents actionable advance warning and lead time, so the change is neither silent nor a surprise.", "slug": "change_notification"}], "normalized_requirement": "Stakeholders experience silent schedule changes, surprise delays, or repeated renegotiation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "No shortlisted record requires the affected stakeholders to experience silence, surprise delay, or repeated renegotiation. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Stakeholders experience silent schedule changes, surprise delays, or repeated renegotiation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "DISJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Demand volume, urgency, or composition shifts after the schedule has already been created.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Tasks, resources, or demands vary over time, but the schedule remains fixed, updates too slowly, or changes informally without a reliable rule. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Demand volume, urgency, or composition shifts after the schedule has already been created. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Demand volume, urgency, or composition shifts after the schedule has already been created.", "Tasks, resources, or demands vary over time, but the schedule remains fixed, updates too slowly, or changes informally without a reliable rule."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "Demand volume, urgency, or composition shifts after the schedule has already been created."}, {"display_text": "Resource capacity changes because of absence, failure, overload, fatigue, supply limits, or unexpected availability.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Good trigger cases include demand spikes, urgent new work, staff absences, machine failures, dependency slips, changing risk, cancellations, or hidden overload. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Resource capacity changes because of absence, failure, overload, fatigue, supply limits, or unexpected availability. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Resource capacity changes because of absence, failure, overload, fatigue, supply limits, or unexpected availability.", "Good trigger cases include demand spikes, urgent new work, staff absences, machine failures, dependency slips, changing risk, cancellations, or hidden overload."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "Resource capacity changes because of absence, failure, overload, fatigue, supply limits, or unexpected availability."}, {"display_text": "Priorities change because new information reveals different risk, value, deadline pressure, or dependency impact.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Tasks, resources, priorities, and constraints vary over time, but the schedule remains rigid or changes through informal improvisation. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Priorities change because new information reveals different risk, value, deadline pressure, or dependency impact. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Priorities change because new information reveals different risk, value, deadline pressure, or dependency impact.", "Tasks, resources, priorities, and constraints vary over time, but the schedule remains rigid or changes through informal improvisation."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Priorities change because new information reveals different risk, value, deadline pressure, or dependency impact."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 2, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-backfill-batch-002", "ledger_sha256": "6899dd091c14c0708df9defc1f56e7467ac4733c0fb180c9451872c71a970ee0"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Adaptive Threshold Recalibration", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:adaptive_threshold_recalibration", "slug": "adaptive_threshold_recalibration"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 2, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 2 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Thresholds simplify complex states into action decisions. That simplification is useful because it gives people and systems a clear rule: above this value, act; below it, do not act; inside this boundary, accept; outside it, investigate. But every threshold depends on assumptions about the measurement, baseline context, distribution of cases, consequence of error, and capacity to respond.\n\nWhen those assumptions change, the same threshold can produce a different kind of system. A monitoring system becomes noisy. A screening cutoff misses cases in a new population. A risk score sends too many cases to a limited review team. A quality limit no longer distinguishes ordinary variation from actual defect risk. A benefits threshold no longer reflects the cost context it was designed for.\n\nThe structural problem is a stale boundary: the formal rule still operates, but its mapping from signal to action has drifted out of fit.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A formerly acceptable threshold now yields harmful timing or classification outcomes after its operating conditions shift."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any listed literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "The reconciled route preserves the final-method diagnostic relation while excluding goals, feasibility conditions, and application constraints."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid initial calibration can align a continuous instrument to a reference without any threshold or history of formerly acceptable threshold performance.", "slug": "calibration"}], "residual_id": "r:adaptive_threshold_recalibration:b002_a08_at_a1", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "The shortlist does not require a threshold, its prior acceptability, and later performance change together."}}, "condition_id": "b002_a08_at_a1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A threshold once produced acceptable action timing, classification, eligibility, alerting, escalation, quality control, or intervention decisions, but its performance has changed. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A threshold once produced acceptable action timing, classification, eligibility, alerting, escalation, quality control, or intervention decisions, but its performance has changed."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid initial calibration can align a continuous instrument to a reference without any threshold or history of formerly acceptable threshold performance.", "slug": "calibration"}], "normalized_requirement": "A once-acceptable threshold has changed performance in action timing, classification, eligibility, alerting, escalation, quality control, or intervention.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "The shortlist does not require a threshold, its prior acceptability, and later performance change together. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A once-acceptable threshold has changed performance in action timing, classification, eligibility, alerting, escalation, quality control, or intervention.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid refinement can improve a candidate against a stable target in a stable environment, with every listed condition unchanged.", "slug": "refinement"}], "residual_id": "r:adaptive_threshold_recalibration:b002_a08_at_a2", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No shortlisted definition requires a shift in one of the source's listed threshold-setting conditions."}}, "condition_id": "b002_a08_at_a2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The baseline distribution, prevalence rate, demand pattern, measurement tool, population mix, operating environment, resource capacity, or risk tolerance has shifted. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The baseline distribution, prevalence rate, demand pattern, measurement tool, population mix, operating environment, resource capacity, or risk tolerance has shifted."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid refinement can improve a candidate against a stable target in a stable environment, with every listed condition unchanged.", "slug": "refinement"}], "normalized_requirement": "The baseline distribution, prevalence, demand, measurement tool, population, environment, capacity, or risk tolerance has shifted.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "No shortlisted definition requires a shift in one of the source's listed threshold-setting conditions. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The baseline distribution, prevalence, demand, measurement tool, population, environment, capacity, or risk tolerance has shifted.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid refinement can concern a draft or design approximation and need not involve a threshold, false alarm, missed event, workload, access, or decision harm.", "slug": "refinement"}], "residual_id": "r:adaptive_threshold_recalibration:b002_a08_at_a3", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "The shortlist does not require a threshold to produce any of the enumerated harmful outcomes."}}, "condition_id": "b002_a08_at_a3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The threshold now produces too many false alarms, too many missed events, delayed action, premature action, excessive workload, unfair access, inequitable error rates, or poor-quality downstream decisions. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The threshold now produces too many false alarms, too many missed events, delayed action, premature action, excessive workload, unfair access, inequitable error rates, or poor-quality downstream decisions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid refinement can concern a draft or design approximation and need not involve a threshold, false alarm, missed event, workload, access, or decision harm.", "slug": "refinement"}], "normalized_requirement": "The threshold now causes false alarms, missed events, mistimed action, excess workload, unfair access, inequitable errors, or poor downstream decisions.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "The shortlist does not require a threshold to produce any of the enumerated harmful outcomes. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The threshold now causes false alarms, missed events, mistimed action, excess workload, unfair access, inequitable errors, or poor downstream decisions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any listed literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "The reconciled route preserves the final-method diagnostic relation while excluding goals, feasibility conditions, and application constraints."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid iterative refinement can proceed from ordinary evaluation feedback without any threshold exception, override, appeal, or manual workaround.", "slug": "refinement"}], "residual_id": "r:adaptive_threshold_recalibration:b002_a08_at_a5", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No shortlisted definition requires threshold-specific workarounds or appeals that evidence lost fit with lived conditions."}}, "condition_id": "b002_a08_at_a5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Existing exceptions, overrides, appeals, or manual workarounds indicate that the formal threshold no longer fits lived conditions. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Existing exceptions, overrides, appeals, or manual workarounds indicate that the formal threshold no longer fits lived conditions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid iterative refinement can proceed from ordinary evaluation feedback without any threshold exception, override, appeal, or manual workaround.", "slug": "refinement"}], "normalized_requirement": "Exceptions, overrides, appeals, or manual workarounds show that the formal threshold no longer fits lived conditions.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "No shortlisted definition requires threshold-specific workarounds or appeals that evidence lost fit with lived conditions. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Exceptions, overrides, appeals, or manual workarounds show that the formal threshold no longer fits lived conditions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The threshold is consequential enough that changing it requires evidence, validation, rationale, governance, and monitoring rather than casual local adjustment.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Recalibration should be evidence-based, documented, validated, and monitored. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: The threshold is consequential enough that changing it requires evidence, validation, rationale, governance, and monitoring rather than casual local adjustment. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The threshold is consequential enough that changing it requires evidence, validation, rationale, governance, and monitoring rather than casual local adjustment.", "Recalibration should be evidence-based, documented, validated, and monitored."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The threshold is consequential enough that changing it requires evidence, validation, rationale, governance, and monitoring rather than casual local adjustment."}, {"display_text": "The system must preserve safety, fairness, quality, or responsiveness while changing the boundary that separates action from non-action.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Thresholds simplify action by drawing a boundary, but changed conditions make fixed boundaries stale. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: The system must preserve safety, fairness, quality, or responsiveness while changing the boundary that separates action from non-action. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The system must preserve safety, fairness, quality, or responsiveness while changing the boundary that separates action from non-action.", "Thresholds simplify action by drawing a boundary, but changed conditions make fixed boundaries stale."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The system must preserve safety, fairness, quality, or responsiveness while changing the boundary that separates action from non-action."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 2, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-backfill-batch-002", "ledger_sha256": "6899dd091c14c0708df9defc1f56e7467ac4733c0fb180c9451872c71a970ee0"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Additive Measure-Space Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:additive_measure_space_design", "slug": "additive_measure_space_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 3, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 3, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 3 of 3 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system needs to compare, aggregate, allocate, integrate, or reason about sizes of subsets, but the universe, admissible subsets, units, additivity rule, null cases, or normalization are implicit, causing double-counting, incomparable quantities, and misleading totals.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Implicit or competing subset-size rules make aggregate totals vulnerable to boundary-sensitive changes or double counting."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any listed literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "The reconciled route preserves the final-method diagnostic relation while excluding goals, feasibility conditions, and application constraints."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The record mandates that an observable on aggregated units is a function of the chosen partition and moves when scale or zoning changes.", "role_mapping": "Mandatory partition dependence of aggregates roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: Alternative partitions or boundaries can change aggregate totals.", "slug": "partition_dependence_of_aggregates", "tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The exact record requires overlapping buckets, summation, and an un-subtracted intersection that counts the same unit twice.", "role_mapping": "Mandatory double counting roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: Alternative partitions or boundaries can change aggregate totals.", "slug": "double_counting", "tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b002_a09_ms_a4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Alternative partitions or boundaries could change totals or create double-counting. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Alternative partitions or boundaries could change totals or create double-counting."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER", "name": "Partition Dependence of Aggregates", "one_liner": "Any statistic computed on partition-aggregated data is a function of the partition itself, not solely of the underlying data.", "page_ref": "prime:partition_dependence_of_aggregates", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Mandatory partition dependence of aggregates roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: Alternative partitions or boundaries can change aggregate totals.", "slug": "partition_dependence_of_aggregates", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The record mandates that an observable on aggregated units is a function of the chosen partition and moves when scale or zoning changes."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER", "name": "Double Counting", "one_liner": "Including the same underlying unit more than once in an aggregate because overlapping buckets are summed without subtracting their intersection.", "page_ref": "prime:double_counting", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Mandatory double counting roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: Alternative partitions or boundaries can change aggregate totals.", "slug": "double_counting", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires overlapping buckets, summation, and an un-subtracted intersection that counts the same unit twice."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Alternative partitions or boundaries can change aggregate totals.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any listed literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "The reconciled route preserves the final-method diagnostic relation while excluding goals, feasibility conditions, and application constraints."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The record mandates that an observable on aggregated units is a function of the chosen partition and moves when scale or zoning changes.", "role_mapping": "Mandatory partition dependence of aggregates roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: Overlapping alternative boundaries can cause the same unit to be counted more than once in a total.", "slug": "partition_dependence_of_aggregates", "tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The exact record requires overlapping buckets, summation, and an un-subtracted intersection that counts the same unit twice.", "role_mapping": "Mandatory double counting roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: Overlapping alternative boundaries can cause the same unit to be counted more than once in a total.", "slug": "double_counting", "tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b002_a09_ms_a5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Alternative partitions or boundaries could change totals or create double-counting. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Alternative partitions or boundaries could change totals or create double-counting."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER", "name": "Partition Dependence of Aggregates", "one_liner": "Any statistic computed on partition-aggregated data is a function of the partition itself, not solely of the underlying data.", "page_ref": "prime:partition_dependence_of_aggregates", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Mandatory partition dependence of aggregates roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: Overlapping alternative boundaries can cause the same unit to be counted more than once in a total.", "slug": "partition_dependence_of_aggregates", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The record mandates that an observable on aggregated units is a function of the chosen partition and moves when scale or zoning changes."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER", "name": "Double Counting", "one_liner": "Including the same underlying unit more than once in an aggregate because overlapping buckets are summed without subtracting their intersection.", "page_ref": "prime:double_counting", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Mandatory double counting roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: Overlapping alternative boundaries can cause the same unit to be counted more than once in a total.", "slug": "double_counting", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires overlapping buckets, summation, and an un-subtracted intersection that counts the same unit twice."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Overlapping alternative boundaries can cause the same unit to be counted more than once in a total.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any listed literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "The reconciled route preserves the final-method diagnostic relation while excluding goals, feasibility conditions, and application constraints."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires the same fine-grained observations to be aggregated under alternative scale or zoning partitions, satisfying the competing-scale disjunct.", "role_mapping": "Mandatory modifiable areal unit problem roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: The same raw observations are summarized under competing units, scales, or coverage assumptions.", "slug": "modifiable_areal_unit_problem", "tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b002_a09_ms_a8", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The same raw observations are being summarized under competing units, scales, or coverage assumptions. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The same raw observations are being summarized under competing units, scales, or coverage assumptions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER", "name": "Modifiable Areal Unit Problem", "one_liner": "Statistics computed on aggregated data change, sometimes reversing sign, when the boundaries used to aggregate are redrawn — the partition is a non-neutral analytical input.", "page_ref": "prime:modifiable_areal_unit_problem", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Mandatory modifiable areal unit problem roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: The same raw observations are summarized under competing units, scales, or coverage assumptions.", "slug": "modifiable_areal_unit_problem", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires the same fine-grained observations to be aggregated under alternative scale or zoning partitions, satisfying the competing-scale disjunct."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The same raw observations are summarized under competing units, scales, or coverage assumptions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "DISJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Subsets of a space, population, territory, event family, corpus, or resource pool need assigned size.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: Subsets of a space, population, territory, event family, corpus, or resource pool need assigned size. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Subsets of a space, population, territory, event family, corpus, or resource pool need assigned size."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "Subsets of a space, population, territory, event family, corpus, or resource pool need assigned size."}, {"display_text": "Disjoint pieces must recombine into a trustworthy total.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: Disjoint pieces must recombine into a trustworthy total. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Disjoint pieces must recombine into a trustworthy total."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "Disjoint pieces must recombine into a trustworthy total."}, {"display_text": "Probability, exposure, area, cost, mass, count, capacity, or importance must be treated as a coherent quantity.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system needs to compare, aggregate, allocate, integrate, or reason about sizes of subsets, but the universe, admissible subsets, units, additivity rule, null cases, or normalization are implicit, causing double-counting, incomparable quantities, and misleading totals. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: Probability, exposure, area, cost, mass, count, capacity, or importance must be treated as a coherent quantity. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Probability, exposure, area, cost, mass, count, capacity, or importance must be treated as a coherent quantity.", "A system needs to compare, aggregate, allocate, integrate, or reason about sizes of subsets, but the universe, admissible subsets, units, additivity rule, null cases, or normalization are implicit, causing double-counting, incomparable quantities, and misleading totals."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Probability, exposure, area, cost, mass, count, capacity, or importance must be treated as a coherent quantity."}, {"display_text": "Some cases may be negligible, zero-sized, nonmeasurable, or undefined.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A measure compresses many possible subsets into comparable sizes, but that compression is valid only if the admissible subsets, zero cases, additivity rule, and scale anchor are explicit. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Some cases may be negligible, zero-sized, nonmeasurable, or undefined. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Some cases may be negligible, zero-sized, nonmeasurable, or undefined.", "A measure compresses many possible subsets into comparable sizes, but that compression is valid only if the admissible subsets, zero cases, additivity rule, and scale anchor are explicit."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Some cases may be negligible, zero-sized, nonmeasurable, or undefined."}, {"display_text": "Downstream integration, optimization, allocation, or risk reasoning depends on the size rule.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system needs to compare, aggregate, allocate, integrate, or reason about sizes of subsets, but the universe, admissible subsets, units, additivity rule, null cases, or normalization are implicit, causing double-counting, incomparable quantities, and misleading totals. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: Downstream integration, optimization, allocation, or risk reasoning depends on the size rule. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Downstream integration, optimization, allocation, or risk reasoning depends on the size rule.", "A system needs to compare, aggregate, allocate, integrate, or reason about sizes of subsets, but the universe, admissible subsets, units, additivity rule, null cases, or normalization are implicit, causing double-counting, incomparable quantities, and misleading totals."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Downstream integration, optimization, allocation, or risk reasoning depends on the size rule."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 2, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-backfill-batch-002", "ledger_sha256": "6899dd091c14c0708df9defc1f56e7467ac4733c0fb180c9451872c71a970ee0"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Adjudication Process Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:adjudication_process_design", "slug": "adjudication_process_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 1 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 1}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is unresolved contestation without trusted decision structure. People may disagree about what happened, which rule applies, whether a decision was valid, or what remedy should follow. Without adjudication design, the system tends toward unilateral discretion, endless argument, hidden evidence, inconsistent treatment, or symbolic complaint channels.\n\nThe deeper tension is that closure requires authority, while fairness requires constraint. A decision must be strong enough to resolve the dispute, but not so unconstrained that it becomes arbitrary, biased, opaque, or impossible to challenge.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Parties dispute facts, governing rules, responsibility, or remedy and therefore lack a settled authoritative outcome."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any listed literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "The reconciled route preserves the final-method diagnostic relation while excluding goals, feasibility conditions, and application constraints."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record mandates disputing parties presenting competing narratives or claims to an authority.", "role_mapping": "Mandatory adjudication dispute resolution roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: Two or more parties disagree about what happened, what rule applies, responsibility, or remedy.", "slug": "adjudication_dispute_resolution", "tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b002_a10_aj_a1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Two or more parties disagree about what happened, what rule applies, who bears responsibility, or what remedy is appropriate. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Two or more parties disagree about what happened, what rule applies, who bears responsibility, or what remedy is appropriate."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER", "name": "Adjudication (Dispute Resolution)", "one_liner": "Dispute resolution.", "page_ref": "prime:adjudication_dispute_resolution", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Mandatory adjudication dispute resolution roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: Two or more parties disagree about what happened, what rule applies, responsibility, or remedy.", "slug": "adjudication_dispute_resolution", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record mandates disputing parties presenting competing narratives or claims to an authority."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Two or more parties disagree about what happened, what rule applies, responsibility, or remedy.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A decision must bind or guide affected parties rather than merely facilitate conversation.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when parties disagree about facts, rules, duties, violations, responsibility, eligibility, or remedy, and the system needs an authoritative decision rather than only discussion. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: A decision must bind or guide affected parties rather than merely facilitate conversation. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A decision must bind or guide affected parties rather than merely facilitate conversation.", "Use this archetype when parties disagree about facts, rules, duties, violations, responsibility, eligibility, or remedy, and the system needs an authoritative decision rather than only discussion."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "A decision must bind or guide affected parties rather than merely facilitate conversation."}, {"display_text": "The stakes are high enough that informal judgment, unilateral discretion, or ad hoc compromise would be perceived as unfair or unreliable.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Without adjudication design, the system tends toward unilateral discretion, endless argument, hidden evidence, inconsistent treatment, or symbolic complaint channels. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: The stakes are high enough that informal judgment, unilateral discretion, or ad hoc compromise would be perceived as unfair or unreliable. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The stakes are high enough that informal judgment, unilateral discretion, or ad hoc compromise would be perceived as unfair or unreliable.", "Without adjudication design, the system tends toward unilateral discretion, endless argument, hidden evidence, inconsistent treatment, or symbolic complaint channels."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "The stakes are high enough that informal judgment, unilateral discretion, or ad hoc compromise would be perceived as unfair or unreliable."}, {"display_text": "Similar disputes recur, making consistency, rationale records, and precedent important.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: Similar disputes recur, making consistency, rationale records, and precedent important. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Similar disputes recur, making consistency, rationale records, and precedent important."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Similar disputes recur, making consistency, rationale records, and precedent important."}, {"display_text": "The deciding actor needs legitimacy because parties may distrust unilateral or interested decision making.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when parties disagree about facts, rules, duties, violations, responsibility, eligibility, or remedy, and the system needs an authoritative decision rather than only discussion. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: The deciding actor needs legitimacy because parties may distrust unilateral or interested decision making. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The deciding actor needs legitimacy because parties may distrust unilateral or interested decision making.", "Use this archetype when parties disagree about facts, rules, duties, violations, responsibility, eligibility, or remedy, and the system needs an authoritative decision rather than only discussion."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The deciding actor needs legitimacy because parties may distrust unilateral or interested decision making."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 2, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-backfill-batch-002", "ledger_sha256": "6899dd091c14c0708df9defc1f56e7467ac4733c0fb180c9451872c71a970ee0"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Advantageous Repositioning", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:advantageous_repositioning", "slug": "advantageous_repositioning"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "An actor or system is trying to achieve a goal from a position where direct effort is expensive, exposed, predictable, blocked, or low-leverage, while other reachable positions in the same state space would confer greater advantage.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "The actor occupies a materially disadvantageous contest position while the position space contains higher-value alternatives."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any listed literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "The reconciled route preserves the final-method diagnostic relation while excluding goals, feasibility conditions, and application constraints."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record mandates a value-graded position space with a differential in leverage, reach, defensibility, or option value.", "role_mapping": "Mandatory positional advantage roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: Positions in the relevant space differ in access, leverage, exposure, timing, information, defensibility, or option quality.", "slug": "positional_advantage", "tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b002_a11_rp_a1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Positions in the relevant space differ materially in access, leverage, exposure, timing, information, defensibility, or option quality. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Positions in the relevant space differ materially in access, leverage, exposure, timing, information, defensibility, or option quality."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER", "name": "Positional Advantage", "one_liner": "Occupying a location in a value-graded space such that the position itself confers advantage — leverage, reach, defensibility, reaction-time — independent of the resources or force held at that location.", "page_ref": "prime:positional_advantage", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Mandatory positional advantage roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: Positions in the relevant space differ in access, leverage, exposure, timing, information, defensibility, or option quality.", "slug": "positional_advantage", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record mandates a value-graded position space with a differential in leverage, reach, defensibility, or option value."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Positions in the relevant space differ in access, leverage, exposure, timing, information, defensibility, or option quality.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record mandates a value-graded position space with a differential in leverage, reach, defensibility, or option value.", "role_mapping": "Mandatory positional advantage roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: The difference in positional advantage is material to the contest.", "slug": "positional_advantage", "tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b002_a11_rp_a2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Positions in the relevant space differ materially in access, leverage, exposure, timing, information, defensibility, or option quality. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Positions in the relevant space differ materially in access, leverage, exposure, timing, information, defensibility, or option quality."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER", "name": "Positional Advantage", "one_liner": "Occupying a location in a value-graded space such that the position itself confers advantage — leverage, reach, defensibility, reaction-time — independent of the resources or force held at that location.", "page_ref": "prime:positional_advantage", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Mandatory positional advantage roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: The difference in positional advantage is material to the contest.", "slug": "positional_advantage", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record mandates a value-graded position space with a differential in leverage, reach, defensibility, or option value."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The difference in positional advantage is material to the contest.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires a defended position whose rising holding cost crosses the point where continued defense is worth less than withdrawal.", "role_mapping": "Mandatory managed retreat roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: The current position makes direct resource contest costly, slow, politically dangerous, or predictably losing.", "slug": "managed_retreat", "tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b002_a11_rp_a3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Goals invite direct action, but direct action from a bad position can waste strength; repositioning creates advantage but costs time, information, coordination, and exposure before the payoff arrives. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The current position makes direct resource contest costly, slow, politically dangerous, or predictably losing.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The current position makes direct resource contest costly, slow, politically dangerous, or predictably losing.", "Goals invite direct action, but direct action from a bad position can waste strength; repositioning creates advantage but costs time, information, coordination, and exposure before the payoff arrives."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER", "name": "Managed Retreat", "one_liner": "Withdrawing deliberately and in advance to a defensible boundary when the cost of holding a position rises past its value, before forced displacement closes the option.", "page_ref": "prime:managed_retreat", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Mandatory managed retreat roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: The current position makes direct resource contest costly, slow, politically dangerous, or predictably losing.", "slug": "managed_retreat", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires a defended position whose rising holding cost crosses the point where continued defense is worth less than withdrawal."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The current position makes direct resource contest costly, slow, politically dangerous, or predictably losing.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Feasible movement exists through time, terrain, venue, channel, role, relationship, architecture, market segment, or institutional frame.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: Feasible movement exists through time, terrain, venue, channel, role, relationship, architecture, market segment, or institutional frame. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Feasible movement exists through time, terrain, venue, channel, role, relationship, architecture, market segment, or institutional frame."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Feasible movement exists through time, terrain, venue, channel, role, relationship, architecture, market segment, or institutional frame."}, {"display_text": "The actor can preserve core goals while changing the location, order, context, or terms of engagement.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: The actor can preserve core goals while changing the location, order, context, or terms of engagement. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The actor can preserve core goals while changing the location, order, context, or terms of engagement."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The actor can preserve core goals while changing the location, order, context, or terms of engagement."}, {"display_text": "Rivals, constraints, customers, users, hazards, or bottlenecks respond differently depending on position.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Rivals, constraints, customers, users, hazards, or bottlenecks respond differently depending on position. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Rivals, constraints, customers, users, hazards, or bottlenecks respond differently depending on position."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Rivals, constraints, customers, users, hazards, or bottlenecks respond differently depending on position."}, {"display_text": "The map of positions is incomplete but good enough to compare likely advantage gradients and risks.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Goals invite direct action, but direct action from a bad position can waste strength; repositioning creates advantage but costs time, information, coordination, and exposure before the payoff arrives. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: The map of positions is incomplete but good enough to compare likely advantage gradients and risks. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The map of positions is incomplete but good enough to compare likely advantage gradients and risks.", "Goals invite direct action, but direct action from a bad position can waste strength; repositioning creates advantage but costs time, information, coordination, and exposure before the payoff arrives."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The map of positions is incomplete but good enough to compare likely advantage gradients and risks."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 2, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-backfill-batch-002", "ledger_sha256": "6899dd091c14c0708df9defc1f56e7467ac4733c0fb180c9451872c71a970ee0"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Adversarial Learning-Rate Rebalancing", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:adversarial_learning_rate_rebalancing", "slug": "adversarial_learning_rate_rebalancing"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 2, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 2, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 5, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 2 of 2 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A deployed rule system, classifier, security control, moderation policy, screening gate, audit regime, or compliance rule is updated slowly while a distributed adversary community probes it in parallel. Successful workarounds are shared, simplified, copied, and improved, so the community’s effective learning curve advances faster than the defender’s formal update loop.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A sharing adversary community reuses discoveries faster than a slowly updated deployed rule system can learn or patch locally."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any listed literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "The reconciled route preserves the final-method diagnostic relation while excluding goals, feasibility conditions, and application constraints."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires a deployed classifier, filter, test, statute, or control whose boundary opponents repeatedly seek to cross while its update cycle is slow.", "role_mapping": "Mandatory community distributed adversarial learning roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: A relatively stable deployed rule, threshold, interface, policy, classifier, or enforcement surface can be probed repeatedly.", "slug": "community_distributed_adversarial_learning", "tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b002_a12_al_a1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The protected system exposes a relatively stable rule, threshold, interface, policy, classifier, or enforcement surface that opponents can probe repeatedly. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The protected system exposes a relatively stable rule, threshold, interface, policy, classifier, or enforcement surface that opponents can probe repeatedly."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER", "name": "Community-Distributed Adversarial Learning", "one_liner": "A sharing adversary community out-learns a slow-updating rule system because discovery cost amortizes across many opponents.", "page_ref": "prime:community_distributed_adversarial_learning", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Mandatory community distributed adversarial learning roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: A relatively stable deployed rule, threshold, interface, policy, classifier, or enforcement surface can be probed repeatedly.", "slug": "community_distributed_adversarial_learning", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires a deployed classifier, filter, test, statute, or control whose boundary opponents repeatedly seek to cross while its update cycle is slow."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A relatively stable deployed rule, threshold, interface, policy, classifier, or enforcement surface can be probed repeatedly.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires many adversaries with low-cost sharing infrastructure and norms of disclosing successful bypasses.", "role_mapping": "Mandatory community distributed adversarial learning roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: Many opponents share similar incentives and can communicate or observe one another's successes.", "slug": "community_distributed_adversarial_learning", "tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b002_a12_al_a2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Many opponents have similar incentives and can communicate or observe one another’s successes. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Many opponents have similar incentives and can communicate or observe one another’s successes."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER", "name": "Community-Distributed Adversarial Learning", "one_liner": "A sharing adversary community out-learns a slow-updating rule system because discovery cost amortizes across many opponents.", "page_ref": "prime:community_distributed_adversarial_learning", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Mandatory community distributed adversarial learning roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: Many opponents share similar incentives and can communicate or observe one another's successes.", "slug": "community_distributed_adversarial_learning", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires many adversaries with low-cost sharing infrastructure and norms of disclosing successful bypasses."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Many opponents share similar incentives and can communicate or observe one another's successes.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The record mandates a public-good technique corpus reusable by new opponents at near-zero marginal cost.", "role_mapping": "Mandatory community distributed adversarial learning roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: A discovered bypass transfers across targets, accounts, jurisdictions, sessions, or time windows with low additional effort.", "slug": "community_distributed_adversarial_learning", "tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b002_a12_al_a3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A discovered bypass transfers across targets, accounts, jurisdictions, sessions, or time windows with low additional effort. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A discovered bypass transfers across targets, accounts, jurisdictions, sessions, or time windows with low additional effort."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER", "name": "Community-Distributed Adversarial Learning", "one_liner": "A sharing adversary community out-learns a slow-updating rule system because discovery cost amortizes across many opponents.", "page_ref": "prime:community_distributed_adversarial_learning", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Mandatory community distributed adversarial learning roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: A discovered bypass transfers across targets, accounts, jurisdictions, sessions, or time windows with low additional effort.", "slug": "community_distributed_adversarial_learning", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The record mandates a public-good technique corpus reusable by new opponents at near-zero marginal cost."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A discovered bypass transfers across targets, accounts, jurisdictions, sessions, or time windows with low additional effort.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record mandates that the deployed rule's update, retraining, or re-legislation cycle is slow relative to community learning.", "role_mapping": "Mandatory community distributed adversarial learning roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: Defensive updates require slower approval, retraining, release, legal review, coordination, or safety checks.", "slug": "community_distributed_adversarial_learning", "tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b002_a12_al_a4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Defensive updates require slower approval, retraining, release, legal review, coordination, or operational safety checks. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Defensive updates require slower approval, retraining, release, legal review, coordination, or operational safety checks."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER", "name": "Community-Distributed Adversarial Learning", "one_liner": "A sharing adversary community out-learns a slow-updating rule system because discovery cost amortizes across many opponents.", "page_ref": "prime:community_distributed_adversarial_learning", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Mandatory community distributed adversarial learning roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: Defensive updates require slower approval, retraining, release, legal review, coordination, or safety checks.", "slug": "community_distributed_adversarial_learning", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record mandates that the deployed rule's update, retraining, or re-legislation cycle is slow relative to community learning."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Defensive updates require slower approval, retraining, release, legal review, coordination, or safety checks.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any listed literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "The reconciled route preserves the final-method diagnostic relation while excluding goals, feasibility conditions, and application constraints."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires a public-good technique corpus whose collective learning outpaces patching individual entries and makes the corpus, not one technique, the threat unit.", "role_mapping": "Mandatory community distributed adversarial learning roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: Single-actor fixes fail because technique spread outpaces each local defender's independent identification.", "slug": "community_distributed_adversarial_learning", "tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b002_a12_al_a5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Single-actor fixes fail because the technique spreads faster than each local defender can identify it independently. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Single-actor fixes fail because the technique spreads faster than each local defender can identify it independently."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER", "name": "Community-Distributed Adversarial Learning", "one_liner": "A sharing adversary community out-learns a slow-updating rule system because discovery cost amortizes across many opponents.", "page_ref": "prime:community_distributed_adversarial_learning", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Mandatory community distributed adversarial learning roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: Single-actor fixes fail because technique spread outpaces each local defender's independent identification.", "slug": "community_distributed_adversarial_learning", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires a public-good technique corpus whose collective learning outpaces patching individual entries and makes the corpus, not one technique, the threat unit."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Single-actor fixes fail because technique spread outpaces each local defender's independent identification.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 2, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-backfill-batch-002", "ledger_sha256": "6899dd091c14c0708df9defc1f56e7467ac4733c0fb180c9451872c71a970ee0"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Adverse Selection Filtering", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:adverse_selection_filtering", "slug": "adverse_selection_filtering"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 5, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a hidden-type entry spiral. The system defines an offer based on an expected average entrant. But entrants are not average; they know more about themselves than the system does. The offer is therefore especially attractive to entrants whose private type makes the offer underpriced, underscreened, or unusually generous. Better-risk or higher-quality entrants may avoid the pool, exit it, or seek alternatives. Over time, the pool’s actual composition diverges from the assumptions that made the offer viable.\n\nThis produces a feedback loop: worse mix leads to higher costs or lower trust; higher costs or lower trust lead to worse terms or weaker participation by good types; the pool deteriorates further. In markets, this can look like “lemons” driving out high-quality goods. In insurance, it can look like high-risk entrants entering at average-risk terms. In platforms, it can look like low-quality sellers exploiting a trusted marketplace until buyers distrust everyone.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Uniform terms induce privately informed worse types to self-select disproportionately, degrading the resulting pool."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any listed literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "The reconciled route preserves the final-method diagnostic relation while excluding goals, feasibility conditions, and application constraints."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires an endogenous willingness-to-transact self-selection dynamic under offered terms.", "role_mapping": "Mandatory adverse selection roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: Participation, purchase, application, enrollment, or membership is voluntary or strategically chosen.", "slug": "adverse_selection", "tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b002_a13_av_a1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Participation, purchase, application, enrollment, or membership is voluntary or strategically chosen. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Participation, purchase, application, enrollment, or membership is voluntary or strategically chosen."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER", "name": "Adverse Selection", "one_liner": "Hidden pre-contractual types make participation under uniform terms systematically more attractive to the types worst for the uninformed side, degrading or unraveling the pool.", "page_ref": "prime:adverse_selection", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Mandatory adverse selection roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: Participation, purchase, application, enrollment, or membership is voluntary or strategically chosen.", "slug": "adverse_selection", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires an endogenous willingness-to-transact self-selection dynamic under offered terms."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Participation, purchase, application, enrollment, or membership is voluntary or strategically chosen.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires the informed side privately to observe a type characteristic determining contracting costs or benefits.", "role_mapping": "Mandatory adverse selection roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: Entrants privately know or infer an important fact about their own risk, quality, usage, need, reliability, or cost.", "slug": "adverse_selection", "tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b002_a13_av_a2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Entrants privately know or can infer something important about their own risk, quality, usage, need, reliability, or cost. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Entrants privately know or can infer something important about their own risk, quality, usage, need, reliability, or cost."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER", "name": "Adverse Selection", "one_liner": "Hidden pre-contractual types make participation under uniform terms systematically more attractive to the types worst for the uninformed side, degrading or unraveling the pool.", "page_ref": "prime:adverse_selection", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Mandatory adverse selection roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: Entrants privately know or infer an important fact about their own risk, quality, usage, need, reliability, or cost.", "slug": "adverse_selection", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires the informed side privately to observe a type characteristic determining contracting costs or benefits."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Entrants privately know or infer an important fact about their own risk, quality, usage, need, reliability, or cost.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires uniform contract terms across hidden types whose cost differences drive systematic selection and pool degradation, certifying materiality.", "role_mapping": "Mandatory adverse selection roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: The same pooled terms are offered to materially different hidden types.", "slug": "adverse_selection", "tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b002_a13_av_a3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "An offer, pool, or system attracts participants with hidden attributes that make the pool worse than expected. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The same pooled terms are offered to materially different hidden types.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The same pooled terms are offered to materially different hidden types.", "An offer, pool, or system attracts participants with hidden attributes that make the pool worse than expected."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER", "name": "Adverse Selection", "one_liner": "Hidden pre-contractual types make participation under uniform terms systematically more attractive to the types worst for the uninformed side, degrading or unraveling the pool.", "page_ref": "prime:adverse_selection", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Mandatory adverse selection roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: The same pooled terms are offered to materially different hidden types.", "slug": "adverse_selection", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires uniform contract terms across hidden types whose cost differences drive systematic selection and pool degradation, certifying materiality."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The same pooled terms are offered to materially different hidden types.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires adverse composition that degrades or unravels the pool, satisfying the viability or quality disjunct.", "role_mapping": "Mandatory adverse selection roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: Pool composition affects viability, cost, quality, trust, solvency, service level, or outcomes for other participants.", "slug": "adverse_selection", "tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b002_a13_av_a4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "First, there is a pool or offer whose members share risk, quality, reputation, service capacity, pricing, or outcomes. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Pool composition affects viability, cost, quality, trust, solvency, service level, or outcomes for other participants.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Pool composition affects viability, cost, quality, trust, solvency, service level, or outcomes for other participants.", "First, there is a pool or offer whose members share risk, quality, reputation, service capacity, pricing, or outcomes."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER", "name": "Adverse Selection", "one_liner": "Hidden pre-contractual types make participation under uniform terms systematically more attractive to the types worst for the uninformed side, degrading or unraveling the pool.", "page_ref": "prime:adverse_selection", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Mandatory adverse selection roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: Pool composition affects viability, cost, quality, trust, solvency, service level, or outcomes for other participants.", "slug": "adverse_selection", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires adverse composition that degrades or unravels the pool, satisfying the viability or quality disjunct."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Pool composition affects viability, cost, quality, trust, solvency, service level, or outcomes for other participants.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires the informed party alone to observe type before contracting while the uninformed side knows only its distribution.", "role_mapping": "Mandatory adverse selection roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: Direct observation of type is difficult before the system accepts exposure.", "slug": "adverse_selection", "tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b002_a13_av_a5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Direct observation of type is difficult before the system accepts exposure. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Direct observation of type is difficult before the system accepts exposure."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER", "name": "Adverse Selection", "one_liner": "Hidden pre-contractual types make participation under uniform terms systematically more attractive to the types worst for the uninformed side, degrading or unraveling the pool.", "page_ref": "prime:adverse_selection", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Mandatory adverse selection roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: Direct observation of type is difficult before the system accepts exposure.", "slug": "adverse_selection", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires the informed party alone to observe type before contracting while the uninformed side knows only its distribution."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Direct observation of type is difficult before the system accepts exposure.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 2, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-backfill-batch-002", "ledger_sha256": "6899dd091c14c0708df9defc1f56e7467ac4733c0fb180c9451872c71a970ee0"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Aesthetic Coherence System", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:aesthetic_coherence_system", "slug": "aesthetic_coherence_system"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 1 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 1}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is fragmentation across contexts. Individual artifacts may each be defensible, but the system as a whole lacks a maintained aesthetic language. People see inconsistent layouts, colors, symbols, tone, spacing, materials, or interaction states and infer that the pieces are unrelated, unreliable, unofficial, or hard to interpret.\n\nThe root tension is between unity and variation. Too little unity produces drift and confusion. Too much unity produces rigid sameness that ignores local context, culture, accessibility, risk, or medium constraints. The archetype works only when it governs meaningful variation rather than enforcing surface uniformity.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Co-present artifacts use an inconsistent aesthetic language that creates visual or interpretive misfit across the system."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any listed literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "The reconciled route preserves the final-method diagnostic relation while excluding goals, feasibility conditions, and application constraints."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires co-present elements in a shared frame that violate a rule of fit and generate perceptible tension.", "role_mapping": "Mandatory dissonance roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: Co-present visual styles, symbols, tones, or category cues violate a shared rule of fit and create perceptible mismatch.", "slug": "dissonance", "tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b002_a14_ae_a6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Local fixes accumulate into visual drift, parallel styles, mismatched symbols, inconsistent tone, or conflicting category cues. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Local fixes accumulate into visual drift, parallel styles, mismatched symbols, inconsistent tone, or conflicting category cues."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER", "name": "Dissonance", "one_liner": "The structural pressure of mis-fit held in coexistence, where elements that violate a rule of fit generate a tension pressing toward resolution, sustain, or reframing.", "page_ref": "prime:dissonance", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Mandatory dissonance roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: Co-present visual styles, symbols, tones, or category cues violate a shared rule of fit and create perceptible mismatch.", "slug": "dissonance", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires co-present elements in a shared frame that violate a rule of fit and generate perceptible tension."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Co-present visual styles, symbols, tones, or category cues violate a shared rule of fit and create perceptible mismatch.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Multiple teams, sites, channels, products, documents, or events produce artifacts that should belong to the same system.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when related things should read as related across channels, teams, products, locations, or moments of use. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: Multiple teams, sites, channels, products, documents, or events produce artifacts that should belong to the same system. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Multiple teams, sites, channels, products, documents, or events produce artifacts that should belong to the same system.", "Use this archetype when related things should read as related across channels, teams, products, locations, or moments of use."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "Multiple teams, sites, channels, products, documents, or events produce artifacts that should belong to the same system."}, {"display_text": "Users or audiences must recognize continuity across surfaces even when content, format, or local conditions differ.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Local expressiveness and context fit must coexist with system-wide recognizability, trust, and interpretive continuity. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: Users or audiences must recognize continuity across surfaces even when content, format, or local conditions differ. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Users or audiences must recognize continuity across surfaces even when content, format, or local conditions differ.", "Local expressiveness and context fit must coexist with system-wide recognizability, trust, and interpretive continuity."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "Users or audiences must recognize continuity across surfaces even when content, format, or local conditions differ."}, {"display_text": "Existing rules are either absent, purely decorative, too rigid, or not tested against interpretation and context.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Too much unity produces rigid sameness that ignores local context, culture, accessibility, risk, or medium constraints. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: Existing rules are either absent, purely decorative, too rigid, or not tested against interpretation and context. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Existing rules are either absent, purely decorative, too rigid, or not tested against interpretation and context.", "Too much unity produces rigid sameness that ignores local context, culture, accessibility, risk, or medium constraints."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Existing rules are either absent, purely decorative, too rigid, or not tested against interpretation and context."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 2, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-backfill-batch-002", "ledger_sha256": "6899dd091c14c0708df9defc1f56e7467ac4733c0fb180c9451872c71a970ee0"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Affect–Evidence Separation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:affect_evidence_separation", "slug": "affect_evidence_separation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 1 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 1}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a collapsed chain:\n\n```text\nfeeling → conclusion → action\n```\n\nA feared option becomes “too dangerous.” An angry interpretation becomes “they meant harm.” A comfortable option becomes “obviously right.” A shame reaction becomes “I failed.” A confident first impression becomes “the diagnosis is settled.”\n\nThe missing middle is the evidence layer. The feeling may be meaningful, but the claim it implies still needs to be stated, checked, and bounded by uncertainty.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A judgment derives its apparent warrant from affective intensity while independent evidence remains insufficient or unclear."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "This branch preserves the complete remedy-free diagnostic route; goals, feasibility clauses, gates, deployment constraints, and supporting context remain outside the DNF."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Emotional reasoning necessarily treats felt intensity as evidence for a world-directed claim while discounting independent evidence, which entails the condition.", "role_mapping": "Affective intensity maps to felt certainty; the external claim maps to the judgment whose independent evidence remains thin.", "slug": "emotional_reasoning", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "ext001_affect_evidence_separation_a01", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored trigger_conditions, structural_problem fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: Greater affective intensity produces greater certainty even when independent evidence is thin.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Greater affective intensity produces greater certainty even when independent evidence is thin."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Emotional Reasoning", "one_liner": "Decisions shaped by emotion.", "page_ref": "prime:emotional_reasoning", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Affective intensity maps to felt certainty; the external claim maps to the judgment whose independent evidence remains thin.", "slug": "emotional_reasoning", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Emotional reasoning necessarily treats felt intensity as evidence for a world-directed claim while discounting independent evidence, which entails the condition."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Greater affective intensity produces greater certainty even when independent evidence is thin.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The feeling carries an implicit factual or evaluative claim.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored trigger_conditions, structural_problem fields; the source file was not modified. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The feeling carries an implicit factual or evaluative claim. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The feeling carries an implicit factual or evaluative claim.", "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored trigger_conditions, structural_problem fields; the source file was not modified."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "The feeling carries an implicit factual or evaluative claim."}, {"display_text": "High stakes, conflict, speed, identity threat, or uncertainty increase affective reactivity.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored trigger_conditions, structural_problem fields; the source file was not modified. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: High stakes, conflict, speed, identity threat, or uncertainty increase affective reactivity. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["High stakes, conflict, speed, identity threat, or uncertainty increase affective reactivity.", "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored trigger_conditions, structural_problem fields; the source file was not modified."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "High stakes, conflict, speed, identity threat, or uncertainty increase affective reactivity."}, {"display_text": "The available evidence is partial, ambiguous, or uneven.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored trigger_conditions, structural_problem fields; the source file was not modified. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The available evidence is partial, ambiguous, or uneven. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The available evidence is partial, ambiguous, or uneven.", "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored trigger_conditions, structural_problem fields; the source file was not modified."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The available evidence is partial, ambiguous, or uneven."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"candidate_ledger_sha256": "96f72d2139077fd57bf795048ebef33b3fd574b20963170080ec916b5b3b92fe", "extension_id": "new-archetypes-extension-001", "ledger_id": "prime-production-v1.2-extension-001", "ledger_sha256": "9644520614744632d1d36da44b1acd77ce432852c6083eb871203521c166efce"}, "base_projection_sha256": "841e0c7f3cb8e8054475ad29a8a14745a416b4fc115559a44878b94292e673ec", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "ca09ed9fe1598ce7072755b530de5553f5ee0a7cd64ae82d9e4a4e2149a37788", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": [{"groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "EXTENSION_COUNTEREXAMPLE_AUDIT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A cue that does not activate defensive self-evaluation is excluded by the DSA exact record, so a complete identity-threat instance cannot falsify the branch.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Identity Threat", "one_liner": "The anticipated devaluation of a positively-valued self-aspect when a situational cue makes it salient — activating a defensive response that competes with the very task or belief-revision the situation demands, and wins often enough to leave measurable costs.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:identity_threat", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "identity_threat"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "identity_threat", "source_unit_id": "EXT001-U004", "why_it_fits": "Identity threat necessarily makes possible devaluation of a valued self-aspect salient and activates a defensive cognitive-emotional response, directly instantiating the supporting condition's identity-threat branch."}], "publication_role": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT_ONLY", "source_residual_occurrence_id": "EXT001:affect_evidence_separation:C03", "unit": {"case_id": "EXT001-C004", "dnf": [["EXT001-U004-O1"], ["EXT001-U004-O2"], ["EXT001-U004-O3"], ["EXT001-U004-O4"], ["EXT001-U004-O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"obligation_id": "EXT001-U004-O1", "predicate": "High stakes increase affective reactivity."}, {"obligation_id": "EXT001-U004-O2", "predicate": "Conflict increases affective reactivity."}, {"obligation_id": "EXT001-U004-O3", "predicate": "Speed increases affective reactivity."}, {"obligation_id": "EXT001-U004-O4", "predicate": "Identity threat increases affective reactivity."}, {"obligation_id": "EXT001-U004-O5", "predicate": "Uncertainty increases affective reactivity."}], "predicate": "High stakes, conflict, speed, identity threat, or uncertainty increase affective reactivity.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "High stakes, conflict, speed, identity threat, or uncertainty increase affective reactivity.", "unit_id": "EXT001-U004"}}]}
{"archetype": {"name": "Affective Contagion Modulation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:affective_contagion_modulation", "slug": "affective_contagion_modulation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 2 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 2}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A group contains channels through which affective states spread automatically, while the group lacks a shared way to notice, interpret, bound, or redirect that spread. A single anxious leader, angry subgroup, viral post, fearful rumor, celebratory ritual, exhausted care team, or euphoric market signal can shift the emotional baseline of many people before the causes, evidence, stakes, and appropriate response are clear.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Affective states propagate automatically through a group faster than its reflective or governing processes can interpret and bound them."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any listed literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "The reconciled route preserves the final-method diagnostic relation while excluding goals, feasibility conditions, and application constraints."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires automatic affect transfer through a coupling network, receiver re-emission, and self-amplifying group propagation.", "role_mapping": "Mandatory emotional contagion roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: Communication channels automatically couple and amplify affect across group members.", "slug": "emotional_contagion", "tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b002_a15_af_a5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Communication channels amplify affect faster than reflection, verification, consent, or leadership response can operate. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Communication channels amplify affect faster than reflection, verification, consent, or leadership response can operate."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER", "name": "Emotional Contagion", "one_liner": "Automatic spread of affect from person to person through a group.", "page_ref": "prime:emotional_contagion", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Mandatory emotional contagion roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: Communication channels automatically couple and amplify affect across group members.", "slug": "emotional_contagion", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires automatic affect transfer through a coupling network, receiver re-emission, and self-amplifying group propagation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Communication channels automatically couple and amplify affect across group members.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires automatic affect transfer through a coupling network, receiver re-emission, and self-amplifying group propagation.", "role_mapping": "Mandatory emotional contagion roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: Affective amplification is faster than reflection, verification, consent, or leadership response can operate.", "slug": "emotional_contagion", "tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b002_a15_af_a6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Communication channels amplify affect faster than reflection, verification, consent, or leadership response can operate. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Communication channels amplify affect faster than reflection, verification, consent, or leadership response can operate."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER", "name": "Emotional Contagion", "one_liner": "Automatic spread of affect from person to person through a group.", "page_ref": "prime:emotional_contagion", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Mandatory emotional contagion roles map to the corresponding entities, states, and relation in: Affective amplification is faster than reflection, verification, consent, or leadership response can operate.", "slug": "emotional_contagion", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires automatic affect transfer through a coupling network, receiver re-emission, and self-amplifying group propagation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Affective amplification is faster than reflection, verification, consent, or leadership response can operate.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A person, subgroup, message, ritual, incident, market move, or public symbol carries a salient emotional state.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A single anxious leader, angry subgroup, viral post, fearful rumor, celebratory ritual, exhausted care team, or euphoric market signal can shift the emotional baseline of many people before the causes, evidence, stakes, and appropriate response are clear. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: A person, subgroup, message, ritual, incident, market move, or public symbol carries a salient emotional state. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A person, subgroup, message, ritual, incident, market move, or public symbol carries a salient emotional state.", "A single anxious leader, angry subgroup, viral post, fearful rumor, celebratory ritual, exhausted care team, or euphoric market signal can shift the emotional baseline of many people before the causes, evidence, stakes, and appropriate response are clear."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "A person, subgroup, message, ritual, incident, market move, or public symbol carries a salient emotional state."}, {"display_text": "Members monitor one another for cues about threat, approval, urgency, belonging, status, or safety.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Members monitor one another for cues about threat, approval, urgency, belonging, status, or safety. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Members monitor one another for cues about threat, approval, urgency, belonging, status, or safety."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "Members monitor one another for cues about threat, approval, urgency, belonging, status, or safety."}, {"display_text": "Attention is concentrated around a visible model, charismatic actor, high-status node, or emotionally charged artifact.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Attention is concentrated around a visible model, charismatic actor, high-status node, or emotionally charged artifact. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Attention is concentrated around a visible model, charismatic actor, high-status node, or emotionally charged artifact."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Attention is concentrated around a visible model, charismatic actor, high-status node, or emotionally charged artifact."}, {"display_text": "The group has shared vulnerability, fatigue, uncertainty, identity threat, recent conflict, or high time pressure.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A group contains channels through which affective states spread automatically, while the group lacks a shared way to notice, interpret, bound, or redirect that spread. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The group has shared vulnerability, fatigue, uncertainty, identity threat, recent conflict, or high time pressure. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The group has shared vulnerability, fatigue, uncertainty, identity threat, recent conflict, or high time pressure.", "A group contains channels through which affective states spread automatically, while the group lacks a shared way to notice, interpret, bound, or redirect that spread."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The group has shared vulnerability, fatigue, uncertainty, identity threat, recent conflict, or high time pressure."}, {"display_text": "Constructive collective energy is desired, but unmanaged intensity could become coercive, exclusionary, or volatile.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this deployment constraint: Constructive collective energy is desired, but unmanaged intensity could become coercive, exclusionary, or volatile. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Constructive collective energy is desired, but unmanaged intensity could become coercive, exclusionary, or volatile."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Constructive collective energy is desired, but unmanaged intensity could become coercive, exclusionary, or volatile."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 2, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-backfill-batch-002", "ledger_sha256": "6899dd091c14c0708df9defc1f56e7467ac4733c0fb180c9451872c71a970ee0"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Affordance Shaping", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:affordance_shaping", "slug": "affordance_shaping"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 3, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 2, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 2 of 3 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The formal action space and the effective action space diverge. An action may be physically possible but invisible, visible but unreachable, easy but harmful, legitimate but high-friction, or salient to the wrong agent at the wrong time. The system then produces nonuse, misuse, workarounds, unsafe shortcuts, or failed coordination even when the intended option technically exists.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A designed action field and the effective action field available to situated agents diverge, causing persistent nonuse, misuse, workarounds, unsafe shortcuts, or failed coordination even though an intended path formally exists."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing the atom loses observed deviation; removing HR1 loses the designed/effective-field relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "Repeated deviation plus its action-field mismatch cause entails the complete diagnosis."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A desire path requires persistent enacted divergence from a prescribed route, so repeated workaround of the intended path is mandatory.", "role_mapping": "Prescribed affordance -> intended path; durable high-traffic deviation -> repeated workaround.", "slug": "desire_path", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b003_a01_afs_t1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Users or agents repeatedly miss, avoid, misuse, or work around the intended path. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Users or agents repeatedly miss, avoid, misuse, or work around the intended path."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Desire Path", "one_liner": "An involuntary trace worn into a designed environment's substrate by repeated use, recording revealed preference where the design fails to accommodate it.", "page_ref": "prime:desire_path", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Prescribed affordance -> intended path; durable high-traffic deviation -> repeated workaround.", "slug": "desire_path", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A desire path requires persistent enacted divergence from a prescribed route, so repeated workaround of the intended path is mandatory."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Agents repeatedly miss, avoid, misuse, or work around the intended path.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The repeated miss, avoidance, misuse, or workaround is caused by a mismatch between the formal and effective action fields.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The repeated miss, avoidance, misuse, or workaround is caused by a mismatch between the formal and effective action fields.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing afs_t2 eliminates the causal misuse route.", "sufficiency_argument": "A harmful path made easier than the safe intended path directly establishes a designed/effective action-field mismatch causing misuse."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The frozen retrieval audit establishes a legitimate actor routing around a safeguard because the protected path is more burdensome, thereby making the unsafe shortcut easier than the safe path.", "role_mapping": "Safeguard path -> safe intended path; bypass route -> easier harmful shortcut.", "slug": "bypassed_safeguard", "tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b003_a01_afs_t2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Misuse, error, or unsafe shortcuts arise because harmful paths are easier or more legible than safe paths. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Misuse, error, or unsafe shortcuts arise because harmful paths are easier or more legible than safe paths."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER", "name": "Bypassed Safeguard", "one_liner": "A protective control is systematically routed around by the very operators it was meant to protect, because it imposes friction against a production task and the workaround is locally rewarded and globally invisible until the rare hazard arrives.", "page_ref": "prime:bypassed_safeguard", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Safeguard path -> safe intended path; bypass route -> easier harmful shortcut.", "slug": "bypassed_safeguard", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The frozen retrieval audit establishes a legitimate actor routing around a safeguard because the protected path is more burdensome, thereby making the unsafe shortcut easier than the safe path."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Misuse, error, or unsafe shortcuts are caused by harmful paths being easier or more legible than safe paths.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing afs_t3 eliminates the observed-trace route.", "sufficiency_argument": "Persistent traces explicitly interpreted as designed-versus-actual field mismatch establish the diagnostic relation."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime is a persistent substrate trace whose mandatory prescribed/enacted divergence records what the design failed to accommodate.", "role_mapping": "Inscribed substrate trace -> observed use trace; prescribed/enacted divergence -> designed/actual action-field mismatch.", "slug": "desire_path", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b003_a01_afs_t3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Observed traces such as desire paths, abandonment, repeated support requests, or robot failures indicate that the designed action field does not match actual use. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Observed traces such as desire paths, abandonment, repeated support requests, or robot failures indicate that the designed action field does not match actual use."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Desire Path", "one_liner": "An involuntary trace worn into a designed environment's substrate by repeated use, recording revealed preference where the design fails to accommodate it.", "page_ref": "prime:desire_path", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Inscribed substrate trace -> observed use trace; prescribed/enacted divergence -> designed/actual action-field mismatch.", "slug": "desire_path", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime is a persistent substrate trace whose mandatory prescribed/enacted divergence records what the design failed to accommodate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Persistent observed traces show that the designed action field does not match actual use.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Desired behavior depends on a situated agent noticing and taking an available action.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The designer controls surfaces, constraints, cues, defaults, and path costs, but the agent experiences only a situated field of action possibilities shaped by capability, perception, context, timing, and expected consequence. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Desired behavior depends on a situated agent noticing and taking an available action. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Desired behavior depends on a situated agent noticing and taking an available action.", "The designer controls surfaces, constraints, cues, defaults, and path costs, but the agent experiences only a situated field of action possibilities shaped by capability, perception, context, timing, and expected consequence."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "Desired behavior depends on a situated agent noticing and taking an available action."}, {"display_text": "The environment, interface, object, habitat, or process can be modified more reliably than the agent can be retrained.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: The environment, interface, object, habitat, or process can be modified more reliably than the agent can be retrained. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The environment, interface, object, habitat, or process can be modified more reliably than the agent can be retrained."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "The environment, interface, object, habitat, or process can be modified more reliably than the agent can be retrained."}, {"display_text": "Different agent populations have different capabilities, prior knowledge, bodily constraints, tools, sensors, or cultural expectations.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The designer controls surfaces, constraints, cues, defaults, and path costs, but the agent experiences only a situated field of action possibilities shaped by capability, perception, context, timing, and expected consequence. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Different agent populations have different capabilities, prior knowledge, bodily constraints, tools, sensors, or cultural expectations. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Different agent populations have different capabilities, prior knowledge, bodily constraints, tools, sensors, or cultural expectations.", "The designer controls surfaces, constraints, cues, defaults, and path costs, but the agent experiences only a situated field of action possibilities shaped by capability, perception, context, timing, and expected consequence."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Different agent populations have different capabilities, prior knowledge, bodily constraints, tools, sensors, or cultural expectations."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 3, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-backfill-batch-003", "ledger_sha256": "e37a7b5048c6a3c1e51377152994fb7f49b2a6f5ab24b8e197275ba0d874a66b"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Agency / Structure Attribution Balance", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:agency_structure_attribution_balance", "slug": "agency_structure_attribution_balance"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 2, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 2 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Individual-centered explanations compress complexity into a memorable causal agent. They often combine several claims without distinguishing them: the actor intended the outcome, made a visible decision, occupied a powerful role, enabled a coalition, became a symbol, and was later credited. These are different causal relationships. A leader can be decisive at one stage and replaceable at another. A founder can shape defaults that persist after departure, but inherited influence can also be reconstructed retrospectively by successors.\n\nStructural accounts have the opposite failure. Institutions, markets, technologies, class relations, demographics, norms, geography, or long-run paths are described as if they acted without people and admitted only one outcome. Structures usually distribute opportunities and constraints unevenly; they shape the option set, information, incentives, authority, and cost of action. They may make several outcomes possible and select which actors are positioned to influence them.\n\nEvidence intensifies the imbalance. Elite actors leave richer archives, while coordination, maintenance, informal labor, resistance, and affected communities appear indirectly. Later narratives select turning points and protagonists to serve identity, legitimacy, entertainment, or policy. Microhistory can reveal contingency but overfit a vivid episode; macrohistory can reveal pattern but erase choice through aggregation.\n\nWithout an explicit model, teams alternate between hero worship, scapegoating, and structural fatalism. Counterfactuals become unbounded speculation, causal importance becomes moral worth, and current institutions preserve or attack a legacy without knowing what mechanisms actually carried it.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A complex outcome is explained by an individual-dominant or structure-dominant monocausal frame that suppresses the interaction of agency, position, opportunity, distributed execution, path dependence, and accountability."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing asa_t1 loses individual dominance; removing HR1 loses the concealment relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "Individual-dominant attribution plus its suppression of actor-structure interaction entails the first diagnostic arm."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime obligatorily overweights the visible actor's disposition and underweights situational causes, instantiating individual-dominant causal attribution.", "role_mapping": "Observed actor -> focal individual; dispositional overweighting -> dominant personal causal weight; situation -> structural field.", "slug": "fundamental_attribution_error", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b003_a02_asa_t1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: One individual receives most causal credit or blame for a complex outcome. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["One individual receives most causal credit or blame for a complex outcome."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Fundamental Attribution Error", "one_liner": "Misattribute causes.", "page_ref": "prime:fundamental_attribution_error", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Observed actor -> focal individual; dispositional overweighting -> dominant personal causal weight; situation -> structural field.", "slug": "fundamental_attribution_error", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime obligatorily overweights the visible actor's disposition and underweights situational causes, instantiating individual-dominant causal attribution."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "One visible individual receives most causal credit or blame for a complex outcome.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The dominant attribution is being treated as causally sufficient and thereby hides load-bearing interaction between person, position, opportunity, distributed action, and path dependence.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The dominant attribution is being treated as causally sufficient and thereby hides load-bearing interaction between person, position, opportunity, distributed action, and path dependence.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing asa_t2 loses structural determinism; removing HR1 loses the concealment relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "Structure-dominant inevitability plus the shared suppression of interaction entails the second diagnostic arm."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime compresses causal multiplicity onto a privileged historical force and treats apparent contingencies as negligible, entailing the open-path-to-inevitability frame.", "role_mapping": "Privileged master variable -> structure-first explanation; relegated contingencies -> historically open paths treated as inevitable.", "slug": "historical_determinism", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b003_a02_asa_t2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A structure-first explanation treats several historically open paths as inevitable. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A structure-first explanation treats several historically open paths as inevitable."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Historical Determinism", "one_liner": "Events predetermined.", "page_ref": "prime:historical_determinism", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Privileged master variable -> structure-first explanation; relegated contingencies -> historically open paths treated as inevitable.", "slug": "historical_determinism", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime compresses causal multiplicity onto a privileged historical force and treats apparent contingencies as negligible, entailing the open-path-to-inevitability frame."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A structure-first explanation treats historically open paths as inevitable.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The dominant attribution is being treated as causally sufficient and thereby hides load-bearing interaction between person, position, opportunity, distributed action, and path dependence.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The dominant attribution is being treated as causally sufficient and thereby hides load-bearing interaction between person, position, opportunity, distributed action, and path dependence.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A founder's legacy is being evaluated before deciding what to preserve or retire.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Do not use it when the task is only to manage a known founder legacy; compose accepted Founder Effect and Legacy Management. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: A founder's legacy is being evaluated before deciding what to preserve or retire. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A founder's legacy is being evaluated before deciding what to preserve or retire.", "Do not use it when the task is only to manage a known founder legacy; compose accepted Founder Effect and Legacy Management."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "A founder's legacy is being evaluated before deciding what to preserve or retire."}, {"display_text": "Sources privilege elite actors while distributed labor, opposition, or affected groups are missing.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Elite actors leave richer archives, while coordination, maintenance, informal labor, resistance, and affected communities appear indirectly. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Sources privilege elite actors while distributed labor, opposition, or affected groups are missing. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Sources privilege elite actors while distributed labor, opposition, or affected groups are missing.", "Elite actors leave richer archives, while coordination, maintenance, informal labor, resistance, and affected communities appear indirectly."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Sources privilege elite actors while distributed labor, opposition, or affected groups are missing."}, {"display_text": "A turning point appears sensitive to timing, position, coalition, or an individual decision.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use it when structural explanations appear to make outcomes inevitable despite evidence of open choices; when a founder legacy must be assessed before preservation or retirement; when elite archives dominate the source record; when distributed contributors or affected groups are absent; when a turning point seems sensitive to timing or position; or when leadership selection, institutional authority, coalition, and resources may explain part of a personal effect. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: A turning point appears sensitive to timing, position, coalition, or an individual decision. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A turning point appears sensitive to timing, position, coalition, or an individual decision.", "Use it when structural explanations appear to make outcomes inevitable despite evidence of open choices; when a founder legacy must be assessed before preservation or retirement; when elite archives dominate the source record; when distributed contributors or affected groups are absent; when a turning point seems sensitive to timing or position; or when leadership selection, institutional authority, coalition, and resources may explain part of a personal effect."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "A turning point appears sensitive to timing, position, coalition, or an individual decision."}, {"display_text": "Leadership selection and institutional role may explain part of an apparent personal effect.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use it when structural explanations appear to make outcomes inevitable despite evidence of open choices; when a founder legacy must be assessed before preservation or retirement; when elite archives dominate the source record; when distributed contributors or affected groups are absent; when a turning point seems sensitive to timing or position; or when leadership selection, institutional authority, coalition, and resources may explain part of a personal effect. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Leadership selection and institutional role may explain part of an apparent personal effect. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Leadership selection and institutional role may explain part of an apparent personal effect.", "Use it when structural explanations appear to make outcomes inevitable despite evidence of open choices; when a founder legacy must be assessed before preservation or retirement; when elite archives dominate the source record; when distributed contributors or affected groups are absent; when a turning point seems sensitive to timing or position; or when leadership selection, institutional authority, coalition, and resources may explain part of a personal effect."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Leadership selection and institutional role may explain part of an apparent personal effect."}, {"display_text": "A biography, commemoration, succession narrative, or public account is shaping current legitimacy.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Later narratives select turning points and protagonists to serve identity, legitimacy, entertainment, or policy. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: A biography, commemoration, succession narrative, or public account is shaping current legitimacy. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A biography, commemoration, succession narrative, or public account is shaping current legitimacy.", "Later narratives select turning points and protagonists to serve identity, legitimacy, entertainment, or policy."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "A biography, commemoration, succession narrative, or public account is shaping current legitimacy."}, {"display_text": "Responsibility decisions risk substituting causal prominence for moral or legal accountability.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Legal or moral responsibility requires separate standards and authority even when this archetype supplies causal evidence. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: Responsibility decisions risk substituting causal prominence for moral or legal accountability. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Responsibility decisions risk substituting causal prominence for moral or legal accountability.", "Legal or moral responsibility requires separate standards and authority even when this archetype supplies causal evidence."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 8, "text": "Responsibility decisions risk substituting causal prominence for moral or legal accountability."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 3, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-backfill-batch-003", "ledger_sha256": "e37a7b5048c6a3c1e51377152994fb7f49b2a6f5ab24b8e197275ba0d874a66b"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Agent–Environment Co-Shaping", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:agent_environment_co_shaping", "slug": "agent_environment_co_shaping"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 3, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 3 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system is managed as though the environment were fixed and behavior were produced only inside agents, even though participants continuously modify the conditions that shape later participation, strategy, capability, survival, and retention. Agent-side training, incentives, or correction then decay because the surrounding environment keeps reinstating the old pattern—or an environmental intervention succeeds initially but creates ungoverned coadaptation, inherited constraints, and spillovers.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system treats its environment as fixed even though agents modify that environment and the modifications feed back into later behavior, selection, participation, or adaptation, causing agent-only interventions to decay or coadaptation to go ungoverned."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing aec_t1 removes the failed agent-only intervention route.", "sufficiency_argument": "Repeated agent-side failure caused by a still-rewarding environment directly establishes mishandled environmental feedback."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Niche construction requires environment-modifying feedback but does not require a failed behavior-change attempt or continued reward for an old pattern.", "slug": "niche_construction"}], "residual_id": "r:agent_environment_co_shaping:b003_a03_aec_t1", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No reviewed shortlist candidate establishes the complete atom under universal forward necessity."}}, "condition_id": "b003_a03_aec_t1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Repeated attempts to change behavior fail because the physical, social, institutional, digital, or ecological environment still rewards the old pattern. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Repeated attempts to change behavior fail because the physical, social, institutional, digital, or ecological environment still rewards the old pattern."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Niche construction requires environment-modifying feedback but does not require a failed behavior-change attempt or continued reward for an old pattern.", "slug": "niche_construction"}], "normalized_requirement": "Behavior-change attempts repeatedly fail because the surrounding environment continues to reward the old pattern.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "No reviewed shortlist candidate establishes the complete atom under universal forward necessity. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Behavior-change attempts repeatedly fail because the surrounding environment continues to reward the old pattern.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing aec_t2 loses environmental modification; removing HR1 loses the management failure.", "sufficiency_argument": "Durable participant modification plus the fixed-environment management error establishes ungoverned co-shaping."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Agent action must modify an environment whose changed affordances or selection pressures act back on the agent or descendants, directly entailing durable participant-made conditions shaping later participants.", "role_mapping": "Agent -> participant; modification channel -> workaround/path/tool/norm/infrastructure change; feedback channel -> later action possibilities.", "slug": "niche_construction", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b003_a03_aec_t2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Participants already create durable workarounds, paths, tools, norms, code, infrastructure, or resource changes that shape what later participants can do. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Participants already create durable workarounds, paths, tools, norms, code, infrastructure, or resource changes that shape what later participants can do."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Niche Construction", "one_liner": "An agent modifies its environment, and the modified environment changes the selection pressures acting back on the modifier — the environment is endogenous.", "page_ref": "prime:niche_construction", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Agent -> participant; modification channel -> workaround/path/tool/norm/infrastructure change; feedback channel -> later action possibilities.", "slug": "niche_construction", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Agent action must modify an environment whose changed affordances or selection pressures act back on the agent or descendants, directly entailing durable participant-made conditions shaping later participants."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Participants create durable environmental modifications that shape what later participants can do.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The endogenous agent-environment loop is being managed as if the environment were fixed, so its persistence or coadaptation is not governed.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The endogenous agent-environment loop is being managed as if the environment were fixed, so its persistence or coadaptation is not governed.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing aec_t3 loses the feedback loop; removing HR1 loses the management failure.", "sufficiency_argument": "Member-driven environmental selection feedback plus the shared management error establishes the complete diagnosis."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's closed loop requires agent-caused environmental change to alter the selection pressures, payoffs, or affordances acting back on the modifier or descendants.", "role_mapping": "Agent -> member population; endogenous selection environment -> platform/market/institution/ecosystem; altered selection -> who joins, survives, succeeds, or remains compatible.", "slug": "niche_construction", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b003_a03_aec_t3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A platform, market, institution, neighborhood, ecosystem, or organization changes in response to its members, and those changes alter who joins, survives, succeeds, or remains compatible. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A platform, market, institution, neighborhood, ecosystem, or organization changes in response to its members, and those changes alter who joins, survives, succeeds, or remains compatible."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Niche Construction", "one_liner": "An agent modifies its environment, and the modified environment changes the selection pressures acting back on the modifier — the environment is endogenous.", "page_ref": "prime:niche_construction", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Agent -> member population; endogenous selection environment -> platform/market/institution/ecosystem; altered selection -> who joins, survives, succeeds, or remains compatible.", "slug": "niche_construction", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's closed loop requires agent-caused environmental change to alter the selection pressures, payoffs, or affordances acting back on the modifier or descendants."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A system changes in response to its members, and those changes alter who joins, survives, succeeds, or remains compatible.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The endogenous agent-environment loop is being managed as if the environment were fixed, so its persistence or coadaptation is not governed.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The endogenous agent-environment loop is being managed as if the environment were fixed, so its persistence or coadaptation is not governed.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "An intervention will persist long enough to affect people, organisms, organizations, or generations that did not make the original change.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: An intervention will persist long enough to affect people, organisms, organizations, or generations that did not make the original change. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["An intervention will persist long enough to affect people, organisms, organizations, or generations that did not make the original change."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "An intervention will persist long enough to affect people, organisms, organizations, or generations that did not make the original change."}, {"display_text": "The intervention may create new roles, specializations, competitors, collaborators, or strategies rather than only changing a single action.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Agent-side training, incentives, or correction then decay because the surrounding environment keeps reinstating the old pattern—or an environmental intervention succeeds initially but creates ungoverned coadaptation, inherited constraints, and spillovers. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The intervention may create new roles, specializations, competitors, collaborators, or strategies rather than only changing a single action. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The intervention may create new roles, specializations, competitors, collaborators, or strategies rather than only changing a single action.", "Agent-side training, incentives, or correction then decay because the surrounding environment keeps reinstating the old pattern—or an environmental intervention succeeds initially but creates ungoverned coadaptation, inherited constraints, and spillovers."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The intervention may create new roles, specializations, competitors, collaborators, or strategies rather than only changing a single action."}, {"display_text": "Environmental buffering, infrastructure, shared services, or habitat modification could reduce recurring adaptation burden.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: Environmental buffering, infrastructure, shared services, or habitat modification could reduce recurring adaptation burden. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Environmental buffering, infrastructure, shared services, or habitat modification could reduce recurring adaptation burden."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Environmental buffering, infrastructure, shared services, or habitat modification could reduce recurring adaptation burden."}, {"display_text": "A beneficial local niche may displace risk or cost to adjacent populations, locations, times, or governance layers.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this deployment constraint: A beneficial local niche may displace risk or cost to adjacent populations, locations, times, or governance layers. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A beneficial local niche may displace risk or cost to adjacent populations, locations, times, or governance layers."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "A beneficial local niche may displace risk or cost to adjacent populations, locations, times, or governance layers."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 3, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-backfill-batch-003", "ledger_sha256": "e37a7b5048c6a3c1e51377152994fb7f49b2a6f5ab24b8e197275ba0d874a66b"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Agentic Control Loop Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:agentic_control_loop_design", "slug": "agentic_control_loop_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 6, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 6, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 6 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system is nominally responsible for outcomes but cannot reliably pursue them because its goal representation, situation understanding, action repertoire, authority, execution pathway, and feedback are disconnected or distorted.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system is nominally responsible for outcomes but cannot intentionally steer them because at least one link among goal, situation model, action repertoire, authority, execution, feedback, or learning is absent or disconnected."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing acl_t1 removes the nominal-ownership route.", "sufficiency_argument": "Outcome ownership without influencing capacity is a complete authority-information-resource-feedback disconnection route."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [], "residual_id": "r:agentic_control_loop_design:b003_a04_acl_t1", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No reviewed shortlist candidate establishes the complete atom under universal forward necessity."}}, "condition_id": "b003_a04_acl_t1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: People or teams are told to own outcomes but lack authority, information, resources, or feedback to influence them. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["People or teams are told to own outcomes but lack authority, information, resources, or feedback to influence them."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "People or teams own outcomes but lack authority, information, resources, or feedback needed to influence them.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "No reviewed shortlist candidate establishes the complete atom under universal forward necessity. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "People or teams own outcomes but lack authority, information, resources, or feedback needed to influence them.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing acl_t2 removes the autonomous-system route.", "sufficiency_argument": "Autonomous action without goal, update, or legitimate-action bounds is a complete control-loop disconnection route."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Agency requires representable goals, belief-sensitive action selection, and a goal-revising loop; it does not entail their absence and has the opposite polarity.", "slug": "agency"}, {"falls_short_because": "Loss of a home-context constraint does not require absence of a legitimate-action boundary, goal model, or update loop.", "slug": "release_from_controlling_context"}], "residual_id": "r:agentic_control_loop_design:b003_a04_acl_t2", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No reviewed shortlist candidate establishes the complete atom under universal forward necessity."}}, "condition_id": "b003_a04_acl_t2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: An autonomous or semi-autonomous system acts without a stable goal model, update loop, or boundary of legitimate action. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["An autonomous or semi-autonomous system acts without a stable goal model, update loop, or boundary of legitimate action."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Agency requires representable goals, belief-sensitive action selection, and a goal-revising loop; it does not entail their absence and has the opposite polarity.", "slug": "agency"}, {"falls_short_because": "Loss of a home-context constraint does not require absence of a legitimate-action boundary, goal model, or update loop.", "slug": "release_from_controlling_context"}], "normalized_requirement": "An autonomous system acts without a stable goal model, update loop, or legitimate-action boundary.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "No reviewed shortlist candidate establishes the complete atom under universal forward necessity. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "An autonomous system acts without a stable goal model, update loop, or legitimate-action boundary.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing acl_t3 removes the situation-model route.", "sufficiency_argument": "Options disconnected from a current situation model directly break belief-sensitive action selection."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [], "residual_id": "r:agentic_control_loop_design:b003_a04_acl_t3", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No reviewed shortlist candidate establishes the complete atom under universal forward necessity."}}, "condition_id": "b003_a04_acl_t3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Decision-makers have options but cannot connect them to a current model of the situation. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Decision-makers have options but cannot connect them to a current model of the situation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "Decision-makers have options but cannot connect them to a current situation model.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "No reviewed shortlist candidate establishes the complete atom under universal forward necessity. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Decision-makers have options but cannot connect them to a current situation model.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing acl_t4 removes the goal-to-action route.", "sufficiency_argument": "Goals and metrics disconnected from live action selection directly establish a broken control loop."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [], "residual_id": "r:agentic_control_loop_design:b003_a04_acl_t4", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No reviewed shortlist candidate establishes the complete atom under universal forward necessity."}}, "condition_id": "b003_a04_acl_t4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A process has goals and metrics but no live action-selection coupling that turns those goals into adaptive behavior. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A process has goals and metrics but no live action-selection coupling that turns those goals into adaptive behavior."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "A process has goals and metrics but no live coupling from them to adaptive action selection.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "No reviewed shortlist candidate establishes the complete atom under universal forward necessity. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A process has goals and metrics but no live coupling from them to adaptive action selection.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing acl_t5 removes the delegation route.", "sufficiency_argument": "Delegated discretion without its context and feedback links directly establishes a broken delegation loop."}, "condition_set_id": "B5", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [], "residual_id": "r:agentic_control_loop_design:b003_a04_acl_t5", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No reviewed shortlist candidate establishes the complete atom under universal forward necessity."}}, "condition_id": "b003_a04_acl_t5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A delegation arrangement gives discretion but not enough context, feedback, accountability, or escalation rules. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A delegation arrangement gives discretion but not enough context, feedback, accountability, or escalation rules."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "Delegation supplies discretion without sufficient context, feedback, accountability, or escalation rules.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "No reviewed shortlist candidate establishes the complete atom under universal forward necessity. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Delegation supplies discretion without sufficient context, feedback, accountability, or escalation rules.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 5", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing acl_t6 removes the model-to-action route.", "sufficiency_argument": "A model or plan disconnected from decision rights or action paths directly establishes the representation-to-execution break."}, "condition_set_id": "B6", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [], "residual_id": "r:agentic_control_loop_design:b003_a04_acl_t6", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No reviewed shortlist candidate establishes the complete atom under universal forward necessity."}}, "condition_id": "b003_a04_acl_t6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A model, dashboard, or plan exists but is not connected to actual decision rights or action paths. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A model, dashboard, or plan exists but is not connected to actual decision rights or action paths."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "A model, dashboard, or plan is disconnected from actual decision rights or action paths.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "No reviewed shortlist candidate establishes the complete atom under universal forward necessity. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A model, dashboard, or plan is disconnected from actual decision rights or action paths.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [8], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 6", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "DISJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Repeated failures produce passivity, learned helplessness, or ritual compliance instead of corrective action.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Repeated failures produce passivity, learned helplessness, or ritual compliance instead of corrective action. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Repeated failures produce passivity, learned helplessness, or ritual compliance instead of corrective action."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Repeated failures produce passivity, learned helplessness, or ritual compliance instead of corrective action."}, {"display_text": "The environment changes quickly enough that fixed instructions no longer substitute for situated agency.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: The environment changes quickly enough that fixed instructions no longer substitute for situated agency. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The environment changes quickly enough that fixed instructions no longer substitute for situated agency."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "The environment changes quickly enough that fixed instructions no longer substitute for situated agency."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 3, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-backfill-batch-003", "ledger_sha256": "e37a7b5048c6a3c1e51377152994fb7f49b2a6f5ab24b8e197275ba0d874a66b"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Aggregate–Marginal Trajectory Reconciliation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:aggregate_marginal_trajectory_reconciliation", "slug": "aggregate_marginal_trajectory_reconciliation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Organizations often build authority, targets, incentives, and public narratives around aggregate measures. Aggregates are attractive because they are stable, legible, and difficult to dismiss as anecdotes. Yet that stability is produced by historical weight. It can make a changing process look unchanged long after the new direction has become visible at the edge.\n\nThree structures create the problem.\n\n### Historical mass\n\nThe aggregate contains earlier contributions that remain large relative to current inflow. A substantial subscriber base can keep revenue rising despite weakening acquisition quality. A mature asset fleet can keep availability high despite defects in new units. A cumulative grade or completion rate can retain the influence of cohorts educated under an earlier program. The larger and slower-turning the stock, the longer the mask can persist.\n\n### Contribution delay\n\nThe newest contribution may affect the aggregate only after maturation, survival, churn, clearance, failure, or replacement. A customer who signs today affects lifetime value over months. A student cohort affects completion years later. A new machine reveals reliability after sufficient exposure. If observation clocks are not aligned, apparent divergence can be manufactured or genuine divergence can be hidden.\n\n### Decision collapse\n\nThe organization asks one metric to answer two questions: \"How are we doing now?\" and \"Where are we heading?\" The aggregate usually answers the first more reliably. The leading edge usually answers the second earlier. When governance collapses both questions into one headline, the stronger constituency selects whichever metric supports its preferred story. The result is either aggregate complacency or leading-edge overreaction.\n\nThe core problem is therefore not simply aggregation bias. Aggregation Bias Detection and Correction asks whether a pooled claim hides subgroup or compositional structure and how the claim should be bounded or corrected. Aggregate–Marginal Trajectory Reconciliation adds a contribution sequence and a time-to-dominance problem. The hidden pattern is not merely another subgroup view; it is the process replacing or reshaping the aggregate. That changes the intervention from corrected interpretation alone to a coordinated transition.\n\nA genuine case has four properties. First, the pair is semantically and dimensionally matched. Second, its directions are opposite for a meaningful interval. Third, a stock, mix, cohort, or turnover account explains the delay. Fourth, the divergence changes what should be done. Without these properties, a dramatic chart may be interesting but it is not this archetype.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A lagging aggregate dominated by accumulated history and the contribution now entering it move in sustained opposite directions, while unmodeled stock-replacement dynamics let the aggregate mask the leading direction and mislead decisions."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Each atom supplies a distinct mandatory role; HR1 supplies the unmodeled-decision relation absent from the measured conditions.", "sufficiency_argument": "The historical-stock anchor, aligned sign opposition, durability certificate, replacement explanation, and governing omission jointly entail the full diagnosis."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Its aggregate is obligatorily a lagging integral dominated by an inertial stock of past contributions.", "role_mapping": "Lagging integral -> aggregate; inertial stock -> prior cohorts or accumulated units; dominance -> material influence.", "slug": "aggregate_marginal_divergence", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b003_a05_amt_t1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A total, average, cumulative rate, installed-base measure, stock, or backlog summary is materially influenced by prior cohorts, vintages, periods, or accumulated units. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A total, average, cumulative rate, installed-base measure, stock, or backlog summary is materially influenced by prior cohorts, vintages, periods, or accumulated units."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Aggregate-Marginal Divergence", "one_liner": "The aggregate trends one way while the next unit's contribution trends the other.", "page_ref": "prime:aggregate_marginal_divergence", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Lagging integral -> aggregate; inertial stock -> prior cohorts or accumulated units; dominance -> material influence.", "slug": "aggregate_marginal_divergence", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Its aggregate is obligatorily a lagging integral dominated by an inertial stock of past contributions."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The aggregate is materially influenced by prior cohorts, vintages, periods, or accumulated units.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Opposite sustainable trends between the lagging aggregate and leading marginal contribution are the prime's defining relation.", "role_mapping": "Aggregate metric -> aggregate trajectory; marginal metric -> entering contribution; opposition -> opposite signs.", "slug": "aggregate_marginal_divergence", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b003_a05_amt_t2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: After aligning construct, unit, denominator, boundary, currency, maturity, and time basis, the aggregate and entering-contribution trajectories have opposite signs. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["After aligning construct, unit, denominator, boundary, currency, maturity, and time basis, the aggregate and entering-contribution trajectories have opposite signs."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Aggregate-Marginal Divergence", "one_liner": "The aggregate trends one way while the next unit's contribution trends the other.", "page_ref": "prime:aggregate_marginal_divergence", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Aggregate metric -> aggregate trajectory; marginal metric -> entering contribution; opposition -> opposite signs.", "slug": "aggregate_marginal_divergence", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Opposite sustainable trends between the lagging aggregate and leading marginal contribution are the prime's defining relation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "After measurement alignment, aggregate and entering-contribution trajectories have opposite signs.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact signature requires opposite-direction trends sustainably rather than as a transient or accounting artifact.", "role_mapping": "Sustainable opposition -> persistence beyond transient, sampling, seasonality, latency, or one-off explanation.", "slug": "aggregate_marginal_divergence", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b003_a05_amt_t3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The divergence persists beyond expected sampling variability, seasonality, reporting latency, or one-off shocks. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The divergence persists beyond expected sampling variability, seasonality, reporting latency, or one-off shocks."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Aggregate-Marginal Divergence", "one_liner": "The aggregate trends one way while the next unit's contribution trends the other.", "page_ref": "prime:aggregate_marginal_divergence", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Sustainable opposition -> persistence beyond transient, sampling, seasonality, latency, or one-off explanation.", "slug": "aggregate_marginal_divergence", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact signature requires opposite-direction trends sustainably rather than as a transient or accounting artifact."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The divergence persists beyond expected variability, seasonality, reporting latency, or one-off shocks.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Its masking duration is obligatorily set by stock-over-flow while the aggregate integrates over a shifting mix.", "role_mapping": "Inertial stock and shifting mix -> legacy/composition/base/turnover explanation; masking duration -> lag.", "slug": "aggregate_marginal_divergence", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b003_a05_amt_t4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Legacy stock, cohort composition, base effects, maturation delay, or slow turnover plausibly explains why the aggregate has not yet followed the leading edge. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Legacy stock, cohort composition, base effects, maturation delay, or slow turnover plausibly explains why the aggregate has not yet followed the leading edge."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Aggregate-Marginal Divergence", "one_liner": "The aggregate trends one way while the next unit's contribution trends the other.", "page_ref": "prime:aggregate_marginal_divergence", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Inertial stock and shifting mix -> legacy/composition/base/turnover explanation; masking duration -> lag.", "slug": "aggregate_marginal_divergence", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Its masking duration is obligatorily set by stock-over-flow while the aggregate integrates over a shifting mix."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Legacy stock, cohort composition, base effects, maturation delay, or slow turnover explains the aggregate's lag behind the leading edge.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "Decision-makers are governing from the unpaired aggregate without an adequate stock-replacement model, so the masked leading direction changes the decision.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Decision-makers are governing from the unpaired aggregate without an adequate stock-replacement model, so the masked leading direction changes the decision.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A corresponding measure can be defined for the newest unit, cohort, intake period, added resource increment, or other contribution entering the aggregate.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "What unit, cohort, period, or increment is entering it now? In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: A corresponding measure can be defined for the newest unit, cohort, intake period, added resource increment, or other contribution entering the aggregate. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A corresponding measure can be defined for the newest unit, cohort, intake period, added resource increment, or other contribution entering the aggregate.", "What unit, cohort, period, or increment is entering it now?"]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "A corresponding measure can be defined for the newest unit, cohort, intake period, added resource increment, or other contribution entering the aggregate."}, {"display_text": "Decisions about continuation, expansion, contraction, remediation, investment, or communication differ depending on whether current state or future direction is emphasized.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "And do not use it as an excuse to abandon installed obligations: the leading edge warns about direction, not about whether current users, assets, patients, students, or cases cease to matter. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: Decisions about continuation, expansion, contraction, remediation, investment, or communication differ depending on whether current state or future direction is emphasized. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Decisions about continuation, expansion, contraction, remediation, investment, or communication differ depending on whether current state or future direction is emphasized.", "And do not use it as an excuse to abandon installed obligations: the leading edge warns about direction, not about whether current users, assets, patients, students, or cases cease to matter."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Decisions about continuation, expansion, contraction, remediation, investment, or communication differ depending on whether current state or future direction is emphasized."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 3, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-backfill-batch-003", "ledger_sha256": "e37a7b5048c6a3c1e51377152994fb7f49b2a6f5ab24b8e197275ba0d874a66b"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Aggregation Bias Detection and Correction", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:aggregation_bias_detection_and_correction", "slug": "aggregation_bias_detection_and_correction"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 3, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 7 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 3 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 7}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is that aggregation is a lossy transformation. It collapses many observations into a smaller representation. That representation may be appropriate for capacity planning, high-level monitoring, or communication, but it can become misleading when the decision requires subgroup, causal, contextual, or individual-level interpretation.\n\nAggregation bias appears when the pooled statistic tells a story that is not true for important subgroups, when group composition creates an apparent relationship, when an aggregate rate is mistaken for individual behavior, or when weighting choices silently privilege one population over another.\n\nThe result is a decision system that feels evidence-based while acting on a distorted view of the evidence.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "An actionable aggregate misrepresents the relevant evidence because pooling hides or reverses subgroup patterns, a weighting rule suppresses important cases, or a claim is carried across levels without a preserving bridge."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing abd_t2 loses observed conflict; removing HR1 loses aggregation as the cause.", "sufficiency_argument": "Aggregate/subgroup conflict caused by aggregation loss establishes the concealment or reversal route."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Its aggregate optimum is obligatorily strong while an operationally important minority is systematically underweighted, establishing conflict with subgroup evidence.", "role_mapping": "Mass-weighted objective -> aggregate finding; important minority -> subgroup evidence; underweighting -> conflict.", "slug": "majority_dominated_aggregate_objective", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "Its aggregate is determined by a small extreme subset rather than the bulk, and the with-versus-without-extremes diagnostic requires a conflicting case-level view.", "role_mapping": "Non-resistant aggregate -> aggregate finding; bulk/tail comparison -> visible case-level variation; two-aggregate gap -> conflict.", "slug": "outlier_leverage", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The pooled association must reverse, vanish, or appear relative to the stratified association after an uneven confounder is collapsed.", "role_mapping": "Pooled association -> aggregate finding; conditional associations -> subgroup evidence; marginal/conditional gap -> conflict.", "slug": "simpson_yule_effect", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The aggregate relationship must have the opposite sign from every subgroup relationship, directly entailing aggregate/subgroup conflict.", "role_mapping": "Pooled relation -> aggregate finding; within-group relations -> subgroup evidence; sign flip -> conflict.", "slug": "simpsons_paradox", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b003_a06_abd_t2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The aggregate finding conflicts with stakeholder experience, subgroup evidence, domain theory, or visible case-level variation. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The aggregate finding conflicts with stakeholder experience, subgroup evidence, domain theory, or visible case-level variation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Majority-Dominated Aggregate Objective", "one_liner": "An aggregate objective whose mass lies with the majority systematically underweights an operationally important minority.", "page_ref": "prime:majority_dominated_aggregate_objective", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Mass-weighted objective -> aggregate finding; important minority -> subgroup evidence; underweighting -> conflict.", "slug": "majority_dominated_aggregate_objective", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Its aggregate optimum is obligatorily strong while an operationally important minority is systematically underweighted, establishing conflict with subgroup evidence."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Outlier Leverage", "one_liner": "A small number of extreme observations carry disproportionate weight in an aggregate result, so the result is more a property of those few points than of the bulk of the data — a consequence of the aggregation rule's non-resistance to extremes, not of any sampling defect.", "page_ref": "prime:outlier_leverage", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Non-resistant aggregate -> aggregate finding; bulk/tail comparison -> visible case-level variation; two-aggregate gap -> conflict.", "slug": "outlier_leverage", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Its aggregate is determined by a small extreme subset rather than the bulk, and the with-versus-without-extremes diagnostic requires a conflicting case-level view."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Simpson–Yule Effect", "one_liner": "An association measured in pooled data can reverse, vanish, or appear once the data are partitioned by a confounder unevenly distributed across the compared groups.", "page_ref": "prime:simpson_yule_effect", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Pooled association -> aggregate finding; conditional associations -> subgroup evidence; marginal/conditional gap -> conflict.", "slug": "simpson_yule_effect", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The pooled association must reverse, vanish, or appear relative to the stratified association after an uneven confounder is collapsed."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Simpson's Paradox", "one_liner": "A relationship can run one direction inside every subgroup and the opposite direction in the aggregate, because a confounder's distribution differs across subgroups and is silently mixed away on pooling.", "page_ref": "prime:simpsons_paradox", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Pooled relation -> aggregate finding; within-group relations -> subgroup evidence; sign flip -> conflict.", "slug": "simpsons_paradox", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The aggregate relationship must have the opposite sign from every subgroup relationship, directly entailing aggregate/subgroup conflict."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The aggregate finding conflicts with subgroup evidence, stakeholder experience, domain theory, or visible case-level variation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The observed aggregate conflict is produced by information lost or reweighted in aggregation rather than by a correctly targeted difference.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The observed aggregate conflict is produced by information lost or reweighted in aggregation rather than by a correctly targeted difference.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Each literal supplies decision use, heterogeneous composition, or its distorting consequence.", "sufficiency_argument": "An actionable aggregate, group heterogeneity, and material composition distortion jointly establish the weighting route."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [], "residual_id": "r:aggregation_bias_detection_and_correction:b003_a06_abd_t1", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No reviewed shortlist candidate establishes the complete atom under universal forward necessity."}}, "condition_id": "b003_a06_abd_t1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A decision depends on an average, rate, benchmark, pooled outcome, composite indicator, or regional/group-level metric. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A decision depends on an average, rate, benchmark, pooled outcome, composite indicator, or regional/group-level metric."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "A decision depends on an aggregate, pooled, composite, or group-level metric.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "No reviewed shortlist candidate establishes the complete atom under universal forward necessity. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A decision depends on an aggregate, pooled, composite, or group-level metric.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Differential inclusion across exposure-outcome strata necessarily makes groups differ in selection into the observed data.", "role_mapping": "Inclusion mechanism -> selection into observed data; exposure-outcome strata -> groups; differential inclusion -> group difference.", "slug": "selection_bias", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "Its latent grouping variable must be unevenly distributed across compared levels and correlated with predictor and outcome.", "role_mapping": "Uneven confounder distribution -> group differences in baseline/exposure/composition.", "slug": "simpson_yule_effect", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "Its subgroups necessarily differ in size, baseline rate, or confounder distribution, satisfying the source disjunction.", "role_mapping": "Subgroup size/base/confounder distribution -> baseline, exposure, or sample-size differences.", "slug": "simpsons_paradox", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b003_a06_abd_t3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Groups differ in baseline rates, exposure, access, timing, sample size, missingness, or selection into the observed data. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Groups differ in baseline rates, exposure, access, timing, sample size, missingness, or selection into the observed data."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Selection Bias", "one_liner": "Skewed sampling.", "page_ref": "prime:selection_bias", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Inclusion mechanism -> selection into observed data; exposure-outcome strata -> groups; differential inclusion -> group difference.", "slug": "selection_bias", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Differential inclusion across exposure-outcome strata necessarily makes groups differ in selection into the observed data."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Simpson–Yule Effect", "one_liner": "An association measured in pooled data can reverse, vanish, or appear once the data are partitioned by a confounder unevenly distributed across the compared groups.", "page_ref": "prime:simpson_yule_effect", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Uneven confounder distribution -> group differences in baseline/exposure/composition.", "slug": "simpson_yule_effect", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Its latent grouping variable must be unevenly distributed across compared levels and correlated with predictor and outcome."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Simpson's Paradox", "one_liner": "A relationship can run one direction inside every subgroup and the opposite direction in the aggregate, because a confounder's distribution differs across subgroups and is silently mixed away on pooling.", "page_ref": "prime:simpsons_paradox", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Subgroup size/base/confounder distribution -> baseline, exposure, or sample-size differences.", "slug": "simpsons_paradox", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Its subgroups necessarily differ in size, baseline rate, or confounder distribution, satisfying the source disjunction."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Groups differ in baseline rate, exposure, access, timing, sample size, missingness, or selection into the observed data.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The group differences materially distort the pooled decision claim through composition or weighting.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The group differences materially distort the pooled decision claim through composition or weighting.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing abd_t4 loses level transfer; removing HR3 leaves a potentially warranted inference.", "sufficiency_argument": "A cross-level claim plus a non-preserving bridge establishes the wrong-level inference route."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a predicate, relationship, estimate, or explanation to be carried from a source level to a distinct target level.", "role_mapping": "Source and target organized levels -> individual/group/regional/time-window levels; carried claim -> analysis movement.", "slug": "cross_level_inference", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b003_a06_abd_t4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The analysis moves between individual-level, group-level, regional-level, or time-window claims. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The analysis moves between individual-level, group-level, regional-level, or time-window claims."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Cross-Level Inference", "one_liner": "Carry a predicate, relationship, estimate, or explanation from one level of an organized system to another through a stated or assumed bridge whose preservation conditions determine whether the target claim is warranted.", "page_ref": "prime:cross_level_inference", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source and target organized levels -> individual/group/regional/time-window levels; carried claim -> analysis movement.", "slug": "cross_level_inference", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a predicate, relationship, estimate, or explanation to be carried from a source level to a distinct target level."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The analysis carries claims between individual, group, regional, or time-window levels.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The cross-level bridge does not preserve the predicate relevant to the target decision, so the carried claim is unwarranted.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The cross-level bridge does not preserve the predicate relevant to the target decision, so the carried claim is unwarranted.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A high-stakes conclusion is being drawn from a dashboard, survey, public-health rate, educational metric, economic indicator, or product experiment rollup.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when a decision, explanation, policy, dashboard, experiment, or public claim depends on an aggregate metric and there is a plausible risk that subgroup structure, composition, weighting, missingness, or level of analysis changes the interpretation. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: A high-stakes conclusion is being drawn from a dashboard, survey, public-health rate, educational metric, economic indicator, or product experiment rollup. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A high-stakes conclusion is being drawn from a dashboard, survey, public-health rate, educational metric, economic indicator, or product experiment rollup.", "Use this archetype when a decision, explanation, policy, dashboard, experiment, or public claim depends on an aggregate metric and there is a plausible risk that subgroup structure, composition, weighting, missingness, or level of analysis changes the interpretation."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "A high-stakes conclusion is being drawn from a dashboard, survey, public-health rate, educational metric, economic indicator, or product experiment rollup."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 3, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-backfill-batch-003", "ledger_sha256": "e37a7b5048c6a3c1e51377152994fb7f49b2a6f5ab24b8e197275ba0d874a66b"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Aggregation Function Design and Weighting", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:aggregation_function_design_and_weighting", "slug": "aggregation_function_design_and_weighting"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system has too many inputs, perspectives, measurements, or signals to act on directly, but a naive summary can erase important variation, introduce hidden value judgments, or produce a decision artifact that users mistake for objective truth.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Many heterogeneous inputs must be reduced to one actionable output, but the choice of rule and weights can change the result, erase important variation, or hide value judgments behind apparent objectivity."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Each condition supplies a distinct obligation, and HR1 supplies the unexamined-objectivity failure.", "sufficiency_argument": "Many-to-one reduction, relevant input heterogeneity, rule-sensitive output, and hidden commitments jointly entail the full design problem."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime is obligatorily a many-to-one mapping that collapses many items into one lower-dimensional summary for tractability.", "role_mapping": "Input multiset -> many inputs; lower-dimensional summary -> one score/ranking/allocation/metric.", "slug": "aggregation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b003_a07_afd_t1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Many inputs must be summarized into one score, ranking, allocation, decision, or reportable metric. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Many inputs must be summarized into one score, ranking, allocation, decision, or reportable metric."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Aggregation", "one_liner": "Deliberately collapsing many items into a single summary, choosing which information to discard to gain tractability.", "page_ref": "prime:aggregation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Input multiset -> many inputs; lower-dimensional summary -> one score/ranking/allocation/metric.", "slug": "aggregation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime is obligatorily a many-to-one mapping that collapses many items into one lower-dimensional summary for tractability."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Many inputs must be summarized into one score, ranking, allocation, decision, or metric.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "An operationally important minority contributes little mass while the majority dominates the objective, necessarily creating importance and decision-relevance differences among inputs.", "role_mapping": "Majority/minority contributions -> inputs; count versus stakes -> importance and decision relevance.", "slug": "majority_dominated_aggregate_objective", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "A few extreme observations necessarily have disproportionate influence under the rule, making input decision relevance unequal.", "role_mapping": "Observation set -> inputs; leverage -> decision relevance; extreme versus bulk -> inequality.", "slug": "outlier_leverage", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b003_a07_afd_t2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The system needs compression for action, but compression inevitably discards or transforms information; the design problem is to choose a rule whose information loss, weighting logic, and legitimacy constraints fit the intended decision. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Inputs differ in scale, reliability, legitimacy, importance, or decision relevance.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Inputs differ in scale, reliability, legitimacy, importance, or decision relevance.", "The system needs compression for action, but compression inevitably discards or transforms information; the design problem is to choose a rule whose information loss, weighting logic, and legitimacy constraints fit the intended decision."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Majority-Dominated Aggregate Objective", "one_liner": "An aggregate objective whose mass lies with the majority systematically underweights an operationally important minority.", "page_ref": "prime:majority_dominated_aggregate_objective", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Majority/minority contributions -> inputs; count versus stakes -> importance and decision relevance.", "slug": "majority_dominated_aggregate_objective", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "An operationally important minority contributes little mass while the majority dominates the objective, necessarily creating importance and decision-relevance differences among inputs."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Outlier Leverage", "one_liner": "A small number of extreme observations carry disproportionate weight in an aggregate result, so the result is more a property of those few points than of the bulk of the data — a consequence of the aggregation rule's non-resistance to extremes, not of any sampling defect.", "page_ref": "prime:outlier_leverage", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Observation set -> inputs; leverage -> decision relevance; extreme versus bulk -> inequality.", "slug": "outlier_leverage", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A few extreme observations necessarily have disproportionate influence under the rule, making input decision relevance unequal."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Inputs differ in scale, reliability, legitimacy, importance, or decision relevance.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Its mass-weighted optimum is minority-blind while the mandatory repair options reweight, retune, or replace the metric, which changes the output relevant to the minority.", "role_mapping": "Mass-weighted versus reweighted objective -> plausible aggregation rules; changed optimum -> different output.", "slug": "majority_dominated_aggregate_objective", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b003_a07_afd_t3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Different plausible aggregation rules would produce different outputs. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Different plausible aggregation rules would produce different outputs."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Majority-Dominated Aggregate Objective", "one_liner": "An aggregate objective whose mass lies with the majority systematically underweights an operationally important minority.", "page_ref": "prime:majority_dominated_aggregate_objective", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Mass-weighted versus reweighted objective -> plausible aggregation rules; changed optimum -> different output.", "slug": "majority_dominated_aggregate_objective", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Its mass-weighted optimum is minority-blind while the mandatory repair options reweight, retune, or replace the metric, which changes the output relevant to the minority."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Different plausible aggregation rules would produce different outputs.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The selected rule is being treated as objective without making its information loss and value commitments explicit.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The selected rule is being treated as objective without making its information loss and value commitments explicit.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The aggregate will guide consequential choices such as funding, ranking, triage, access, reputation, or public accountability.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: The aggregate will guide consequential choices such as funding, ranking, triage, access, reputation, or public accountability. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The aggregate will guide consequential choices such as funding, ranking, triage, access, reputation, or public accountability."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The aggregate will guide consequential choices such as funding, ranking, triage, access, reputation, or public accountability."}, {"display_text": "Stakeholders disagree about which inputs should dominate or how tradeoffs should be represented.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Stakeholders disagree about which inputs should dominate or how tradeoffs should be represented. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders disagree about which inputs should dominate or how tradeoffs should be represented."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Stakeholders disagree about which inputs should dominate or how tradeoffs should be represented."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 3, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-backfill-batch-003", "ledger_sha256": "e37a7b5048c6a3c1e51377152994fb7f49b2a6f5ab24b8e197275ba0d874a66b"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Aggregation to Manage Complexity", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:aggregation_to_manage_complexity", "slug": "aggregation_to_manage_complexity"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 5, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 5 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 1 of 5 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is excessive granularity. The system contains many elements that are meaningful individually but too numerous, noisy, fragmented, or detailed for the target scale of reasoning. Without aggregation, actors drown in raw data, rely on anecdotes, overreact to visible cases, or avoid decisions because the system has no tractable object of attention.\n\nThe deeper tension is **tractability versus fidelity**. A coarser view makes action possible, but every coarser view suppresses something. The challenge is not simply to summarize; it is to summarize in a way that preserves enough of the structure that matters.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Raw granularity exceeds the tractable granularity required for observation, comparison, decision, or communication, so actors cannot work effectively at the relevant scale without grouping elements into higher-level units."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing agc_t1 eliminates the capacity-overflow route.", "sufficiency_argument": "Element count beyond actor capacity directly establishes a granularity-tractability mismatch."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires competing inputs to exceed a bounded selection pool and produce missed signals, slowing, or channel dropping.", "role_mapping": "Competing inputs -> elements; bounded selection pool -> actor capacity; demand-supply exceedance -> element count exceeds capacity.", "slug": "attentional_capacity", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b003_a08_agc_t1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The number of elements exceeds the attention, memory, reporting, or decision capacity of the actors responsible for them. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The number of elements exceeds the attention, memory, reporting, or decision capacity of the actors responsible for them."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Attentional Capacity", "one_liner": "Finite pool of selection bandwidth whose exceeded supply degrades processing through interference, slowing, or capture.", "page_ref": "prime:attentional_capacity", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Competing inputs -> elements; bounded selection pool -> actor capacity; demand-supply exceedance -> element count exceeds capacity.", "slug": "attentional_capacity", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires competing inputs to exceed a bounded selection pool and produce missed signals, slowing, or channel dropping."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The element count exceeds the attention, memory, reporting, or decision capacity of responsible actors.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing agc_t2 eliminates the decision-scale route.", "sufficiency_argument": "A decision scale broader than the recorded scale directly establishes the required granularity shift."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [], "residual_id": "r:aggregation_to_manage_complexity:b003_a08_agc_t2", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No reviewed shortlist candidate establishes the complete atom under universal forward necessity."}}, "condition_id": "b003_a08_agc_t2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Without aggregation, actors drown in raw data, rely on anecdotes, overreact to visible cases, or avoid decisions because the system has no tractable object of attention. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The useful decision is made at a broader scale than the raw data or local cases are recorded.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The useful decision is made at a broader scale than the raw data or local cases are recorded.", "Without aggregation, actors drown in raw data, rely on anecdotes, overreact to visible cases, or avoid decisions because the system has no tractable object of attention."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The useful decision is made at a broader scale than the raw data or local cases are recorded.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "No reviewed shortlist candidate establishes the complete atom under universal forward necessity. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The useful decision is made at a broader scale than the raw data or local cases are recorded.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing agc_t3 eliminates the pattern-legibility route.", "sufficiency_argument": "Fine-grained variation that hides the relevant pattern directly establishes unusable raw granularity."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid law-of-large-numbers instance may have degenerate or already stable observations; it does not require fine-grained noise, instability, or unreadability.", "slug": "law_of_large_numbers"}], "residual_id": "r:aggregation_to_manage_complexity:b003_a08_agc_t3", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No reviewed shortlist candidate establishes the complete atom under universal forward necessity."}}, "condition_id": "b003_a08_agc_t3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Fine-grained variation is noisy, unstable, or too numerous to reveal the relevant pattern directly. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Fine-grained variation is noisy, unstable, or too numerous to reveal the relevant pattern directly."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid law-of-large-numbers instance may have degenerate or already stable observations; it does not require fine-grained noise, instability, or unreadability.", "slug": "law_of_large_numbers"}], "normalized_requirement": "Fine-grained variation is too noisy, unstable, or numerous to reveal the relevant pattern directly.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "No reviewed shortlist candidate establishes the complete atom under universal forward necessity. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Fine-grained variation is too noisy, unstable, or numerous to reveal the relevant pattern directly.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing agc_t4 eliminates the comparison route.", "sufficiency_argument": "Comparison impossible without a rollup directly establishes a scale mismatch."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A shared metric enables comparison of heterogeneous values but does not require grouping cases into a common aggregation level.", "slug": "commensurability"}], "residual_id": "r:aggregation_to_manage_complexity:b003_a08_agc_t4", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No reviewed shortlist candidate establishes the complete atom under universal forward necessity."}}, "condition_id": "b003_a08_agc_t4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Comparisons across cases, locations, products, teams, cohorts, or time periods are impossible without a common rollup level. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Comparisons across cases, locations, products, teams, cohorts, or time periods are impossible without a common rollup level."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A shared metric enables comparison of heterogeneous values but does not require grouping cases into a common aggregation level.", "slug": "commensurability"}], "normalized_requirement": "Cross-case comparison is impossible without a common rollup level.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "No reviewed shortlist candidate establishes the complete atom under universal forward necessity. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Cross-case comparison is impossible without a common rollup level.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing agc_t5 eliminates the communication route.", "sufficiency_argument": "A communication object-count limit directly establishes excessive raw granularity."}, "condition_set_id": "B5", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A medium has a hard throughput ceiling even when the current message fits below it; the prime does not require the object count to exceed communication capacity.", "slug": "channel_capacity"}], "residual_id": "r:aggregation_to_manage_complexity:b003_a08_agc_t5", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No reviewed shortlist candidate establishes the complete atom under universal forward necessity."}}, "condition_id": "b003_a08_agc_t5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Communication to a broader audience requires fewer objects than the underlying system contains. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Communication to a broader audience requires fewer objects than the underlying system contains."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A medium has a hard throughput ceiling even when the current message fits below it; the prime does not require the object count to exceed communication capacity.", "slug": "channel_capacity"}], "normalized_requirement": "Communication requires fewer decision objects than the underlying system contains.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "No reviewed shortlist candidate establishes the complete atom under universal forward necessity. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Communication requires fewer decision objects than the underlying system contains.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 5", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "DISJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The system needs both a high-level view and a way to return to detail when an aggregate behaves unusually or affects high-stakes decisions.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when there are too many granular elements for direct handling and when a higher-level view would support a real decision, comparison, monitoring task, communication need, or action. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: The system needs both a high-level view and a way to return to detail when an aggregate behaves unusually or affects high-stakes decisions. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The system needs both a high-level view and a way to return to detail when an aggregate behaves unusually or affects high-stakes decisions.", "Use this archetype when there are too many granular elements for direct handling and when a higher-level view would support a real decision, comparison, monitoring task, communication need, or action."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The system needs both a high-level view and a way to return to detail when an aggregate behaves unusually or affects high-stakes decisions."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 3, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-backfill-batch-003", "ledger_sha256": "e37a7b5048c6a3c1e51377152994fb7f49b2a6f5ab24b8e197275ba0d874a66b"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Alertness-Capacity Maintenance", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:alertness_capacity_maintenance", "slug": "alertness_capacity_maintenance"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 4, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 4 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A person, team, interface, sensor system, institution, or operational process must remain able to notice relevant change over time, but cannot place full attention on every possible signal. Without explicit alertness design, the system oscillates between neglect and over-alerting: it misses quiet signals, floods people with alarms, confuses visibility with readiness, lets handoffs drop context, or demands unsustainable hypervigilance.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system must remain able to notice important intermittent change but cannot sustain attention to every possible signal, and its monitoring arrangement therefore risks both missed signals and alert-driven erosion of notice capacity."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Each literal supplies signal difficulty, capacity constraint, or the two-sided cost.", "sufficiency_argument": "Difficult important signals, infeasible continuous attention, and two-sided error cost jointly establish the standing-alertness problem."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [], "residual_id": "r:alertness_capacity_maintenance:b003_a09_alr_t1", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No reviewed shortlist candidate establishes the complete atom under universal forward necessity."}}, "condition_id": "b003_a09_alr_t1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Without explicit alertness design, the system oscillates between neglect and over-alerting: it misses quiet signals, floods people with alarms, confuses visibility with readiness, lets handoffs drop context, or demands unsustainable hypervigilance. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Important signals are rare, intermittent, ambiguous, delayed, quiet, or embedded in routine activity.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Important signals are rare, intermittent, ambiguous, delayed, quiet, or embedded in routine activity.", "Without explicit alertness design, the system oscillates between neglect and over-alerting: it misses quiet signals, floods people with alarms, confuses visibility with readiness, lets handoffs drop context, or demands unsustainable hypervigilance."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "Important signals are rare, intermittent, ambiguous, delayed, quiet, or embedded in routine activity.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "No reviewed shortlist candidate establishes the complete atom under universal forward necessity. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Important signals are rare, intermittent, ambiguous, delayed, quiet, or embedded in routine activity.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Its competing-input stream exceeds bounded parallel selection capacity, necessarily making continuous focal selection of all monitoring inputs impossible.", "role_mapping": "Competing inputs -> possible signals; bounded selection pool -> monitoring attention; exceedance -> continuous all-signal attention is impossible.", "slug": "attentional_capacity", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "Sustained cognitive consumption without restoration obligatorily degrades attention and performance, establishing the cognitively destructive disjunct.", "role_mapping": "Sustained resource use -> continuous focal monitoring; capacity degradation -> cognitive destruction/cost.", "slug": "cognitive_resource_depletion", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b003_a09_alr_t2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Continuous focal attention is impossible, expensive, unsafe, or cognitively destructive. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Continuous focal attention is impossible, expensive, unsafe, or cognitively destructive."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Attentional Capacity", "one_liner": "Finite pool of selection bandwidth whose exceeded supply degrades processing through interference, slowing, or capture.", "page_ref": "prime:attentional_capacity", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Competing inputs -> possible signals; bounded selection pool -> monitoring attention; exceedance -> continuous all-signal attention is impossible.", "slug": "attentional_capacity", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Its competing-input stream exceeds bounded parallel selection capacity, necessarily making continuous focal selection of all monitoring inputs impossible."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Cognitive Resource Depletion", "one_liner": "Cognitive capacity degrades from sustained resource consumption.", "page_ref": "prime:cognitive_resource_depletion", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Sustained resource use -> continuous focal monitoring; capacity degradation -> cognitive destruction/cost.", "slug": "cognitive_resource_depletion", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Sustained cognitive consumption without restoration obligatorily degrades attention and performance, establishing the cognitively destructive disjunct."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Continuous focal monitoring is impossible, expensive, unsafe, or cognitively destructive.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [], "residual_id": "r:alertness_capacity_maintenance:b003_a09_alr_t3", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No reviewed shortlist candidate establishes the complete atom under universal forward necessity."}}, "condition_id": "b003_a09_alr_t3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The cost of missed signals is meaningful, but false alarms and alert fatigue also impose real costs. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The cost of missed signals is meaningful, but false alarms and alert fatigue also impose real costs."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "Missed signals are costly, while false alarms and alert fatigue also impose real cost.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "No reviewed shortlist candidate establishes the complete atom under universal forward necessity. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Missed signals are costly, while false alarms and alert fatigue also impose real cost.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing alr_t4 eliminates the habituation and overload route.", "sufficiency_argument": "Monitoring-induced sensitivity decay directly establishes loss of notice capacity."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a repeatedly firing low-specificity signal to lose recruiting power through habituation and base-rate collapse until signals are missed.", "role_mapping": "Signal channel -> alarms/dashboard; accumulated exposure -> repetition; recruiting-power loss -> reduced sensitivity.", "slug": "habituation_to_repeated_signal", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b003_a09_alr_t4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Repeated alarms, stable dashboards, monotony, stress, or task load can reduce sensitivity over time. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Repeated alarms, stable dashboards, monotony, stress, or task load can reduce sensitivity over time."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Habituation to Repeated Signal", "one_liner": "A signal channel meant to recruit attention to a flagged condition loses its recruiting power as exposure accumulates, through the compounding of receiver habituation and base-rate degradation, until the channel is noisily active but informationally bankrupt.", "page_ref": "prime:habituation_to_repeated_signal", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Signal channel -> alarms/dashboard; accumulated exposure -> repetition; recruiting-power loss -> reduced sensitivity.", "slug": "habituation_to_repeated_signal", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a repeatedly firing low-specificity signal to lose recruiting power through habituation and base-rate collapse until signals are missed."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Repeated alarms, stable displays, monotony, stress, or task load reduces sensitivity over time.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing alr_t5 eliminates the exhortation-without-system route.", "sufficiency_argument": "An alertness mandate without watch, recovery, or escalation design directly establishes unmanaged notice capacity."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [], "residual_id": "r:alertness_capacity_maintenance:b003_a09_alr_t5", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No reviewed shortlist candidate establishes the complete atom under universal forward necessity."}}, "condition_id": "b003_a09_alr_t5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: People are being told to “be alert” without a designed watch field, cadence, recovery model, or escalation boundary. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["People are being told to “be alert” without a designed watch field, cadence, recovery model, or escalation boundary."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "People are told to be alert without a designed watch field, cadence, recovery model, or escalation boundary.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "No reviewed shortlist candidate establishes the complete atom under universal forward necessity. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "People are told to be alert without a designed watch field, cadence, recovery model, or escalation boundary.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing alr_t6 eliminates the technically-present-but-functionally-absent route.", "sufficiency_argument": "Technical observability without preserved human notice directly establishes the artifact-versus-capacity failure."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [], "residual_id": "r:alertness_capacity_maintenance:b003_a09_alr_t6", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No reviewed shortlist candidate establishes the complete atom under universal forward necessity."}}, "condition_id": "b003_a09_alr_t6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: An existing observability or alerting system is technically present but not preserving actual human or organizational notice capacity. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["An existing observability or alerting system is technically present but not preserving actual human or organizational notice capacity."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "An observability or alerting system exists but does not preserve actual human or organizational notice capacity.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "No reviewed shortlist candidate establishes the complete atom under universal forward necessity. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "An observability or alerting system exists but does not preserve actual human or organizational notice capacity.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A monitoring role crosses handoffs, shifts, automation boundaries, or responsibility boundaries.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: A monitoring role crosses handoffs, shifts, automation boundaries, or responsibility boundaries. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A monitoring role crosses handoffs, shifts, automation boundaries, or responsibility boundaries."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "A monitoring role crosses handoffs, shifts, automation boundaries, or responsibility boundaries."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 3, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-backfill-batch-003", "ledger_sha256": "e37a7b5048c6a3c1e51377152994fb7f49b2a6f5ab24b8e197275ba0d874a66b"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Alienation Reconnection", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:alienation_reconnection", "slug": "alienation_reconnection"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 6, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 5, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 6 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 1 of 6 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Mediation, specialization, hierarchy, abstraction, and scale can make complex systems\npossible, but can also sever the relationships through which participation becomes\nintelligible and consequential. Participants become inputs, cases, users, or metrics;\nfeedback disappears into queues; recognition becomes symbolic; and exit becomes the only\ncredible agency.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "People remain formally involved in a system while structural arrangements disconnect them from agency, intelligible consequence, meaningful contribution, reciprocity, purpose, or legitimate governance, producing estrangement."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing ali_t1 eliminates that route.", "sufficiency_argument": "Loss of contribution-to-consequence traceability is one complete estrangement route."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Alienation can concern control, self, community, or activity without loss of contribution-to-beneficiary traceability.", "slug": "alienation"}], "residual_id": "r:alienation_reconnection:b003_a10_ali_t1", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No reviewed shortlist candidate establishes the complete atom under universal forward necessity."}}, "condition_id": "b003_a10_ali_t1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: People participate but cannot trace their contribution to outcomes or beneficiaries. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["People participate but cannot trace their contribution to outcomes or beneficiaries."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Alienation can concern control, self, community, or activity without loss of contribution-to-beneficiary traceability.", "slug": "alienation"}], "normalized_requirement": "Participants cannot trace their contribution to outcomes or beneficiaries.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "No reviewed shortlist candidate establishes the complete atom under universal forward necessity. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Participants cannot trace their contribution to outcomes or beneficiaries.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing ali_t2 eliminates that route.", "sufficiency_argument": "Remote, opaque, uncontestable governance is one complete agency-disconnection route."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Alienation may arise from estranged products or labor even when decision procedures are local, visible, and contestable.", "slug": "alienation"}], "residual_id": "r:alienation_reconnection:b003_a10_ali_t2", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No reviewed shortlist candidate establishes the complete atom under universal forward necessity."}}, "condition_id": "b003_a10_ali_t2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Decisions materially affect participants, but their choices are cosmetic, advisory. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Decisions affecting participants are remote, opaque, or practically uncontestable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Decisions affecting participants are remote, opaque, or practically uncontestable.", "Decisions materially affect participants, but their choices are cosmetic, advisory"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Alienation may arise from estranged products or labor even when decision procedures are local, visible, and contestable.", "slug": "alienation"}], "normalized_requirement": "Decisions affecting participants are remote, opaque, or practically uncontestable.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "No reviewed shortlist candidate establishes the complete atom under universal forward necessity. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Decisions affecting participants are remote, opaque, or practically uncontestable.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing ali_t3 eliminates that route.", "sufficiency_argument": "Role fragmentation that erases purpose and system consequence is one complete meaning-disconnection route."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The general estrangement relation does not require fragmented roles or loss of whole-system visibility in every valid instance.", "slug": "alienation"}], "residual_id": "r:alienation_reconnection:b003_a10_ali_t3", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No reviewed shortlist candidate establishes the complete atom under universal forward necessity."}}, "condition_id": "b003_a10_ali_t3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Roles fragment action so severely that purpose and whole-system consequence disappear. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Roles fragment action so severely that purpose and whole-system consequence disappear."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The general estrangement relation does not require fragmented roles or loss of whole-system visibility in every valid instance.", "slug": "alienation"}], "normalized_requirement": "Role fragmentation makes purpose and whole-system consequence disappear.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "No reviewed shortlist candidate establishes the complete atom under universal forward necessity. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Role fragmentation makes purpose and whole-system consequence disappear.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing ali_t4 eliminates that route.", "sufficiency_argument": "Demanded belonging without voice, reciprocity, or exit is one complete community-disconnection route."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A structurally alienated activity need not include a symbolic belonging demand or weak exit.", "slug": "alienation"}], "residual_id": "r:alienation_reconnection:b003_a10_ali_t4", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No reviewed shortlist candidate establishes the complete atom under universal forward necessity."}}, "condition_id": "b003_a10_ali_t4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Belonging is demanded symbolically while voice, reciprocity, or exit remains weak. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Belonging is demanded symbolically while voice, reciprocity, or exit remains weak."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A structurally alienated activity need not include a symbolic belonging demand or weak exit.", "slug": "alienation"}], "normalized_requirement": "Symbolic belonging is demanded while voice, reciprocity, or exit remains weak.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "No reviewed shortlist candidate establishes the complete atom under universal forward necessity. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Symbolic belonging is demanded while voice, reciprocity, or exit remains weak.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing ali_t5 eliminates that route.", "sufficiency_argument": "Feedback disconnected from correction is one complete consequence-and-agency disconnection route."}, "condition_set_id": "B5", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Every valid echo chamber filters disconfirmation and strips or reinterprets corrective signal, necessarily satisfying the filtered-feedback disjunct.", "role_mapping": "Input filter -> filtered feedback; stripped disconfirmation -> feedback disconnected from correction.", "slug": "echo_chamber", "tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b003_a10_ali_t5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Feedback moves upward or inward, then disappears without an owner, reason, correction,. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Feedback is delayed, filtered, one-directional, or disconnected from correction.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Feedback is delayed, filtered, one-directional, or disconnected from correction.", "Feedback moves upward or inward, then disappears without an owner, reason, correction,"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER", "name": "Echo Chamber", "one_liner": "A bounded community whose input filter and internal reinforcement gradient amplify shared beliefs and strip out the corrective signal that would moderate them, while members experience the environment as complete rather than filtered.", "page_ref": "prime:echo_chamber", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Input filter -> filtered feedback; stripped disconfirmation -> feedback disconnected from correction.", "slug": "echo_chamber", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Every valid echo chamber filters disconfirmation and strips or reinterprets corrective signal, necessarily satisfying the filtered-feedback disjunct."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Feedback is delayed, filtered, one-directional, or disconnected from correction.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 5", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing ali_t6 eliminates that route.", "sufficiency_argument": "Treating participants as interchangeable inputs is one complete recognition-and-agency disconnection route."}, "condition_set_id": "B6", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Some alienation instances preserve individual differentiation while estranging the agent from product, activity, or control.", "slug": "alienation"}], "residual_id": "r:alienation_reconnection:b003_a10_ali_t6", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No reviewed shortlist candidate establishes the complete atom under universal forward necessity."}}, "condition_id": "b003_a10_ali_t6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A system treats participants as interchangeable inputs, cases, users, or metrics. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A system treats participants as interchangeable inputs, cases, users, or metrics."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Some alienation instances preserve individual differentiation while estranging the agent from product, activity, or control.", "slug": "alienation"}], "normalized_requirement": "The system treats participants as interchangeable inputs, cases, users, or metrics.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "No reviewed shortlist candidate establishes the complete atom under universal forward necessity. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The system treats participants as interchangeable inputs, cases, users, or metrics.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 6", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "DISJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 3, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-backfill-batch-003", "ledger_sha256": "e37a7b5048c6a3c1e51377152994fb7f49b2a6f5ab24b8e197275ba0d874a66b"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Alignment Governance and Dispute Resolution", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:alignment_governance_and_dispute_resolution", "slug": "alignment_governance_and_dispute_resolution"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 3, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 5, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 6 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 3 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is not merely that people disagree. The problem is that disagreement occurs inside a system of interdependence without a legitimate resolution pathway. Local optimization, unclear decision rights, contested standing, and informal escalation turn ordinary misalignment into cascading delay, power struggle, inconsistent precedent, or legitimacy breakdown.\n\nCommon symptoms include repeated reopening of the same priority dispute, hidden escalation to sponsors, accusations that decisions lacked standing or due process, and inconsistent handling of similar cases. The root tension is that the system needs enough authority to decide, but enough process legitimacy that affected parties accept the decision as something other than domination.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Interdependent parties have system-level conflicts but lack clear, legitimate, durable authority and process for resolving them, so disputes recur or bypass formal channels and cascade into operational or legitimacy loss."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Each literal supplies conflict, authority defect, or the missing resolution consequence.", "sufficiency_argument": "System conflict, ambiguous authority, and absence of a legitimate binding route jointly entail the governance failure."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires multiple legitimate role-expectation bundles whose joint feasible set is empty, so individually coherent role goals conflict in the encompassing system.", "role_mapping": "Role set -> local roles; expectation bundles -> individually reasonable goals; empty intersection -> system-level conflict.", "slug": "role_conflict", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b003_a11_alg_t1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Local units, roles, or stakeholders have goals that appear reasonable in isolation but conflict at the system level. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Local units, roles, or stakeholders have goals that appear reasonable in isolation but conflict at the system level."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Role Conflict", "one_liner": "Conflicting roles.", "page_ref": "prime:role_conflict", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Role set -> local roles; expectation bundles -> individually reasonable goals; empty intersection -> system-level conflict.", "slug": "role_conflict", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires multiple legitimate role-expectation bundles whose joint feasible set is empty, so individually coherent role goals conflict in the encompassing system."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Local units, roles, or stakeholders have individually reasonable goals that conflict at system level.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [], "residual_id": "r:alignment_governance_and_dispute_resolution:b003_a11_alg_t2", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No reviewed shortlist candidate establishes the complete atom under universal forward necessity."}}, "condition_id": "b003_a11_alg_t2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Authority to decide is ambiguous, contested, fragmented, or informally overridden. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Authority to decide is ambiguous, contested, fragmented, or informally overridden."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "Decision authority is ambiguous, contested, fragmented, or informally overridden.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "No reviewed shortlist candidate establishes the complete atom under universal forward necessity. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Decision authority is ambiguous, contested, fragmented, or informally overridden.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The interdependent parties lack a legitimate binding route that can resolve the stated system-level conflict.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The interdependent parties lack a legitimate binding route that can resolve the stated system-level conflict.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing alg_t3 loses recurrence; removing HR2 loses the conflict substrate.", "sufficiency_argument": "Recurring noninstitutionalized disputes plus the interdependent-conflict substrate entail the recurrence route."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [], "residual_id": "r:alignment_governance_and_dispute_resolution:b003_a11_alg_t3", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No reviewed shortlist candidate establishes the complete atom under universal forward necessity."}}, "condition_id": "b003_a11_alg_t3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when authority is ambiguous, disputes recur, decisions are politically exposed, or parties need a forum they can recognize as valid even when they dislike the outcome. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Disputes recur because prior decisions are not recorded, binding, or translated into changed rules.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Disputes recur because prior decisions are not recorded, binding, or translated into changed rules.", "It is especially useful when authority is ambiguous, disputes recur, decisions are politically exposed, or parties need a forum they can recognize as valid even when they dislike the outcome."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "Disputes recur because prior decisions are not recorded, binding, or translated into changed rules.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "No reviewed shortlist candidate establishes the complete atom under universal forward necessity. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Disputes recur because prior decisions are not recorded, binding, or translated into changed rules.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The recurring or bypassed dispute concerns interdependent parties with a system-level goal, mandate, evidence, or obligation conflict.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The recurring or bypassed dispute concerns interdependent parties with a system-level goal, mandate, evidence, or obligation conflict.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing alg_t4 loses process bypass; removing HR2 loses the conflict substrate.", "sufficiency_argument": "Side-channel escalation plus the interdependent-conflict substrate entails the bypass route."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [], "residual_id": "r:alignment_governance_and_dispute_resolution:b003_a11_alg_t4", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No reviewed shortlist candidate establishes the complete atom under universal forward necessity."}}, "condition_id": "b003_a11_alg_t4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Escalation is happening through side channels, hierarchy shopping, reputation pressure, or delay rather than a defined process. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Escalation is happening through side channels, hierarchy shopping, reputation pressure, or delay rather than a defined process."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "Escalation proceeds through side channels, hierarchy shopping, reputation pressure, or delay rather than a defined process.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "No reviewed shortlist candidate establishes the complete atom under universal forward necessity. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Escalation proceeds through side channels, hierarchy shopping, reputation pressure, or delay rather than a defined process.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The recurring or bypassed dispute concerns interdependent parties with a system-level goal, mandate, evidence, or obligation conflict.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The recurring or bypassed dispute concerns interdependent parties with a system-level goal, mandate, evidence, or obligation conflict.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A conflict has high enough consequence that ad hoc negotiation is too fragile or politically exposed.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when authority is ambiguous, disputes recur, decisions are politically exposed, or parties need a forum they can recognize as valid even when they dislike the outcome. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: A conflict has high enough consequence that ad hoc negotiation is too fragile or politically exposed. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A conflict has high enough consequence that ad hoc negotiation is too fragile or politically exposed.", "It is especially useful when authority is ambiguous, disputes recur, decisions are politically exposed, or parties need a forum they can recognize as valid even when they dislike the outcome."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "A conflict has high enough consequence that ad hoc negotiation is too fragile or politically exposed."}, {"display_text": "Parties need a forum they can recognize as legitimate even when they dislike the result.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when authority is ambiguous, disputes recur, decisions are politically exposed, or parties need a forum they can recognize as valid even when they dislike the outcome. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: Parties need a forum they can recognize as legitimate even when they dislike the result. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Parties need a forum they can recognize as legitimate even when they dislike the result.", "It is especially useful when authority is ambiguous, disputes recur, decisions are politically exposed, or parties need a forum they can recognize as valid even when they dislike the outcome."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Parties need a forum they can recognize as legitimate even when they dislike the result."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 3, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-backfill-batch-003", "ledger_sha256": "e37a7b5048c6a3c1e51377152994fb7f49b2a6f5ab24b8e197275ba0d874a66b"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Alternative-Hypothesis Generation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:alternative_hypothesis_generation", "slug": "alternative_hypothesis_generation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 1 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 1}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A reasoner, team, institution, or model converges on a favored explanation before credible alternatives have been named, compared, or tested. The conclusion may be narratively coherent, emotionally satisfying, institutionally convenient, or statistically salient, yet still underdetermined by the available evidence. Without a rival-hypothesis step, uncertainty is hidden and confidence rises faster than warrant.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A favored explanation is treated as settled before credible alternatives are generated, compared, or tested even though the available evidence underdetermines the conclusion."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing ahg_t1 removes the only premature-closure route.", "sufficiency_argument": "Premature dominance before plausible rivals are ruled out directly establishes the complete diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Healthy abduction compares a generated candidate space and keeps the selected explanation provisional and defeasible; it does not entail premature closure.", "slug": "abductive_reasoning"}], "residual_id": "r:alternative_hypothesis_generation:b003_a12_ahg_t1", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No reviewed shortlist candidate establishes the complete atom under universal forward necessity."}}, "condition_id": "b003_a12_ahg_t1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: One explanation is becoming dominant before evidence has ruled out plausible rivals. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["One explanation is becoming dominant before evidence has ruled out plausible rivals."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Healthy abduction compares a generated candidate space and keeps the selected explanation provisional and defeasible; it does not entail premature closure.", "slug": "abductive_reasoning"}], "normalized_requirement": "One explanation becomes dominant before evidence has ruled out plausible rivals.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "No reviewed shortlist candidate establishes the complete atom under universal forward necessity. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "One explanation becomes dominant before evidence has ruled out plausible rivals.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The same observations could plausibly arise from multiple mechanisms, causes, actors, or contexts.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The same observations could plausibly arise from multiple mechanisms, causes, actors, or contexts. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The same observations could plausibly arise from multiple mechanisms, causes, actors, or contexts."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "The same observations could plausibly arise from multiple mechanisms, causes, actors, or contexts."}, {"display_text": "The conclusion is high-stakes, irreversible, reputationally damaging, safety-relevant, or costly.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: The conclusion is high-stakes, irreversible, reputationally damaging, safety-relevant, or costly. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The conclusion is high-stakes, irreversible, reputationally damaging, safety-relevant, or costly."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "The conclusion is high-stakes, irreversible, reputationally damaging, safety-relevant, or costly."}, {"display_text": "The reasoning environment rewards decisiveness, coherence, authority, or speed more than uncertainty disclosure.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The reasoning environment rewards decisiveness, coherence, authority, or speed more than uncertainty disclosure. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The reasoning environment rewards decisiveness, coherence, authority, or speed more than uncertainty disclosure."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The reasoning environment rewards decisiveness, coherence, authority, or speed more than uncertainty disclosure."}, {"display_text": "Evidence is sparse, noisy, incomplete, selected, or vulnerable to measurement artifact.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Evidence is sparse, noisy, incomplete, selected, or vulnerable to measurement artifact. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Evidence is sparse, noisy, incomplete, selected, or vulnerable to measurement artifact."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Evidence is sparse, noisy, incomplete, selected, or vulnerable to measurement artifact."}, {"display_text": "Experts, sources, or stakeholders disagree in ways that cannot be dismissed as bad faith or ignorance.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Experts, sources, or stakeholders disagree in ways that cannot be dismissed as bad faith or ignorance. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Experts, sources, or stakeholders disagree in ways that cannot be dismissed as bad faith or ignorance."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Experts, sources, or stakeholders disagree in ways that cannot be dismissed as bad faith or ignorance."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 3, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-backfill-batch-003", "ledger_sha256": "e37a7b5048c6a3c1e51377152994fb7f49b2a6f5ab24b8e197275ba0d874a66b"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Ambidextrous Portfolio Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:ambidextrous_portfolio_design", "slug": "ambidextrous_portfolio_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 3, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 3 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is not lack of creativity alone. It is a mode conflict. Exploitation and exploration impose different demands on the same system.\n\nExploitation wants repeatability, efficiency, predictability, risk control, and accountability to known outcomes. Exploration wants experimentation, uncertainty reduction, reversible probes, hypothesis testing, and tolerance for partial failure. When one governance frame is forced onto both modes, one side tends to dominate. Core operations kill exploration because exploration looks inefficient, or exploration disrupts core operations because novelty is allowed to bypass operational discipline.\n\nThe common failure pattern is a false choice: either protect the present and become obsolete, or chase the future and destabilize the present. Ambidextrous Portfolio Design rejects that false choice by treating the tension as a portfolio architecture problem.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system must exploit current capabilities and explore uncertain future options, but the two modes are not protected and connected by an explicit portfolio logic, so one crowds out the other or exploration remains isolated from adoption."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing amb_t1 eliminates the crowdout route.", "sufficiency_argument": "Current operations consuming all capacity directly establish exploitation crowdout."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime requires explicit structural and resource mechanisms supporting both modes; it does not entail exploitation crowding exploration out.", "slug": "ambidexterity_exploit_vs_explore"}], "residual_id": "r:ambidextrous_portfolio_design:b003_a13_amb_t1", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No reviewed shortlist candidate establishes the complete atom under universal forward necessity."}}, "condition_id": "b003_a13_amb_t1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Current operations are absorbing all capacity, leaving no room for learning, experimentation, or renewal. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Current operations are absorbing all capacity, leaving no room for learning,\nexperimentation, or renewal."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime requires explicit structural and resource mechanisms supporting both modes; it does not entail exploitation crowding exploration out.", "slug": "ambidexterity_exploit_vs_explore"}], "normalized_requirement": "Current operations absorb all capacity, leaving no room for learning, experimentation, or renewal.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "No reviewed shortlist candidate establishes the complete atom under universal forward necessity. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Current operations absorb all capacity, leaving no room for learning, experimentation, or renewal.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing amb_t2 eliminates the isolated-exploration route.", "sufficiency_argument": "Exploration killed or adoption-isolated directly establishes the disconnected-mode route."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid ambidextrous design structurally separates exploration while also aligning its path and incentives; it need not be killed or adoption-isolated.", "slug": "ambidexterity_exploit_vs_explore"}], "residual_id": "r:ambidextrous_portfolio_design:b003_a13_amb_t2", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No reviewed shortlist candidate establishes the complete atom under universal forward necessity."}}, "condition_id": "b003_a13_amb_t2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Exploratory work exists but is either killed by short-term metrics or isolated from core adoption. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Exploratory work exists but is either killed by short-term metrics or isolated from core\nadoption."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid ambidextrous design structurally separates exploration while also aligning its path and incentives; it need not be killed or adoption-isolated.", "slug": "ambidexterity_exploit_vs_explore"}], "normalized_requirement": "Exploratory work is killed by short-term metrics or isolated from core adoption.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "No reviewed shortlist candidate establishes the complete atom under universal forward necessity. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Exploratory work is killed by short-term metrics or isolated from core adoption.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing amb_t3 eliminates the missing-portfolio route.", "sufficiency_argument": "Many future bets without a balancing logic directly establish the absent-portfolio route."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [], "residual_id": "r:ambidextrous_portfolio_design:b003_a13_amb_t3", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No reviewed shortlist candidate establishes the complete atom under universal forward necessity."}}, "condition_id": "b003_a13_amb_t3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The system has many possible innovations, improvements, or future bets but no clear portfolio logic for balancing them. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The system has many possible innovations, improvements, or future bets but no clear\nportfolio logic for balancing them."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "Many possible innovations or future bets exist without a clear portfolio logic for balancing them.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "No reviewed shortlist candidate establishes the complete atom under universal forward necessity. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Many possible innovations or future bets exist without a clear portfolio logic for balancing them.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "DISJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A mature service, product, program, or capability must continue to perform while the environment is changing.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: A mature service, product, program, or capability must continue to perform while the environment is changing. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A mature service, product, program, or capability must continue to perform while the environment is changing."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "A mature service, product, program, or capability must continue to perform while the\nenvironment is changing."}, {"display_text": "Leadership needs to choose how much attention, budget, and talent should go to core performance versus future options.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when a system is pulled between present performance and future adaptation. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: Leadership needs to choose how much attention, budget, and talent should go to core performance versus future options. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Leadership needs to choose how much attention, budget, and talent should go to core performance versus future options.", "Use this archetype when a system is pulled between present performance and future adaptation."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Leadership needs to choose how much attention, budget, and talent should go to core\nperformance versus future options."}, {"display_text": "The cost of overcommitting to the present or overcommitting to novelty is becoming visible.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The cost of overcommitting to the present or overcommitting to novelty is becoming visible. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The cost of overcommitting to the present or overcommitting to novelty is becoming visible."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The cost of overcommitting to the present or overcommitting to novelty is becoming visible."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 3, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-backfill-batch-003", "ledger_sha256": "e37a7b5048c6a3c1e51377152994fb7f49b2a6f5ab24b8e197275ba0d874a66b"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Ambiguity-Exploitation in Visual Metaphor", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:ambiguity_exploitation_in_visual_metaphor", "slug": "ambiguity_exploitation_in_visual_metaphor"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 2, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 2 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A visual work, sign, or design needs to communicate an abstract relation, tension, identity, emotion, or critique that cannot be captured well by one literal image. Direct illustration flattens meaning; unconstrained ambiguity makes the work unreadable. The designer must create multiple possible readings while preventing interpretive collapse into either a single slogan or arbitrary private association.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A visual work needs several constrained and productive readings because one literal reading would flatten its meaning, while unconstrained ambiguity would make it arbitrary or unreadable."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing avm_t1 loses the plurality need; removing HR1 loses the constraint failure.", "sufficiency_argument": "Need for plural readings plus insufficient interpretive constraint entails the flattening-versus-arbitrariness tension."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [], "residual_id": "r:ambiguity_exploitation_in_visual_metaphor:b003_a14_avm_t1", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No reviewed shortlist candidate establishes the complete atom under universal forward necessity."}}, "condition_id": "b003_a14_avm_t1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A single reading would oversimplify the work or reduce audience participation. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A single reading would oversimplify the work or reduce audience participation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "A single reading would oversimplify the work or reduce audience participation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "No reviewed shortlist candidate establishes the complete atom under universal forward necessity. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A single reading would oversimplify the work or reduce audience participation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The needed plurality of readings also lacks sufficient shared constraints to prevent arbitrary or unreadable interpretation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The needed plurality of readings also lacks sufficient shared constraints to prevent arbitrary or unreadable interpretation.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing avm_t2 eliminates the symbol-collapse route.", "sufficiency_argument": "Cliché-or-private-code collapse directly instantiates the two-sided visual-ambiguity failure."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime spans transparent through innovative or opaque metaphors but does not require that a given work face cliché-or-private-code collapse.", "slug": "metaphor_visual_artistic"}], "residual_id": "r:ambiguity_exploitation_in_visual_metaphor:b003_a14_avm_t2", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No reviewed shortlist candidate establishes the complete atom under universal forward necessity."}}, "condition_id": "b003_a14_avm_t2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Visual symbols risk becoming either generic clichés or obscure personal codes. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Visual symbols risk becoming either generic clichés or obscure personal codes."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime spans transparent through innovative or opaque metaphors but does not require that a given work face cliché-or-private-code collapse.", "slug": "metaphor_visual_artistic"}], "normalized_requirement": "Visual symbols risk collapsing into generic clichés or obscure private codes.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "No reviewed shortlist candidate establishes the complete atom under universal forward necessity. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Visual symbols risk collapsing into generic clichés or obscure private codes.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The intended meaning is relational, emotional, ethical, political, or conceptual rather than directly pictorial.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Visual metaphor needs enough structure for shared meaning, but enough ambiguity for interpretive participation, emotional resonance, and layered conceptual mapping. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The intended meaning is relational, emotional, ethical, political, or conceptual rather than directly pictorial. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The intended meaning is relational, emotional, ethical, political, or conceptual rather than directly pictorial.", "Visual metaphor needs enough structure for shared meaning, but enough ambiguity for interpretive participation, emotional resonance, and layered conceptual mapping."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "The intended meaning is relational, emotional, ethical, political, or conceptual rather than directly pictorial."}, {"display_text": "The audience includes multiple cultures, communities, expertise levels, or lived experiences.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The audience includes multiple cultures, communities, expertise levels, or lived experiences. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The audience includes multiple cultures, communities, expertise levels, or lived experiences."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "The audience includes multiple cultures, communities, expertise levels, or lived experiences."}, {"display_text": "The work must provoke reflection, re-seeing, or interpretive discovery rather than immediate instruction only.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: The work must provoke reflection, re-seeing, or interpretive discovery rather than immediate instruction only. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The work must provoke reflection, re-seeing, or interpretive discovery rather than immediate instruction only."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The work must provoke reflection, re-seeing, or interpretive discovery rather than immediate instruction only."}, {"display_text": "A design must preserve deniability, openness, poetic resonance, or layered meaning without becoming misleading.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Visual metaphor needs enough structure for shared meaning, but enough ambiguity for interpretive participation, emotional resonance, and layered conceptual mapping. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: A design must preserve deniability, openness, poetic resonance, or layered meaning without becoming misleading. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A design must preserve deniability, openness, poetic resonance, or layered meaning without becoming misleading.", "Visual metaphor needs enough structure for shared meaning, but enough ambiguity for interpretive participation, emotional resonance, and layered conceptual mapping."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "A design must preserve deniability, openness, poetic resonance, or layered meaning without becoming misleading."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 3, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-backfill-batch-003", "ledger_sha256": "e37a7b5048c6a3c1e51377152994fb7f49b2a6f5ab24b8e197275ba0d874a66b"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Anchoring Reset", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:anchoring_reset", "slug": "anchoring_reset"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 3, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 4 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 3 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is inherited reference-point distortion. A person or group begins from a number, label, example, ranking, prior plan, or first impression; then later adjustments remain too close to that reference even when evidence should move the judgment farther away.\n\nThis distortion can persist even when participants are intelligent, experienced, and sincere. The anchor does not need to be believed as truth. It only needs to become the starting coordinate for adjustment. Once it becomes the starting coordinate, downstream deliberation often becomes a debate about how much to adjust rather than whether the starting point deserved that status at all.\n\nCommon symptoms include estimates clustering around the first number, alternatives being evaluated relative to the initial option, a prior budget being copied forward, a first diagnosis shaping later evidence interpretation, or a strategic opening offer defining the perceived negotiation range.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A quantitative or scaled downstream judgment remains systematically and insufficiently adjusted toward an initial reference point whose relevance, accuracy, or strategic intent was not independently established."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing anr_t1 loses reference primacy; removing HR1 loses bias and insufficient adjustment.", "sufficiency_argument": "An initial reference before independent judgment plus unwarranted residual pull entails anchoring."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a specifiable initial numerical reference that structures a later quantitative or scaled judgment before adjustment.", "role_mapping": "Initial anchor -> first number; quantitative judgment -> downstream independent judgment; primacy -> encountered before adjustment.", "slug": "anchoring", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b003_a15_anr_t1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A first number or label was encountered before independent judgment. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A first number or label was encountered before independent judgment."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Anchoring", "one_liner": "Overweight initial info.", "page_ref": "prime:anchoring", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Initial anchor -> first number; quantitative judgment -> downstream independent judgment; primacy -> encountered before adjustment.", "slug": "anchoring", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a specifiable initial numerical reference that structures a later quantitative or scaled judgment before adjustment."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A first number or label is encountered before independent judgment.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The reference exerts systematic unwarranted pull on a quantitative or scaled judgment, and adjustment remains insufficient.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The reference exerts systematic unwarranted pull on a quantitative or scaled judgment, and adjustment remains insufficient.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing anr_t2 loses reuse; removing HR1 loses bias and insufficient adjustment.", "sufficiency_argument": "Reuse of an old reference plus unwarranted residual pull entails the legacy-anchor route."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An anchor may be random, newly introduced, or self-generated and therefore need not be an old or reused reference.", "slug": "anchoring"}], "residual_id": "r:anchoring_reset:b003_a15_anr_t2", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No reviewed shortlist candidate establishes the complete atom under universal forward necessity."}}, "condition_id": "b003_a15_anr_t2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: An old baseline, budget, precedent, or prior estimate is being reused. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["An old baseline, budget, precedent, or prior estimate is being reused."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An anchor may be random, newly introduced, or self-generated and therefore need not be an old or reused reference.", "slug": "anchoring"}], "normalized_requirement": "An old baseline, budget, precedent, or prior estimate is reused.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "No reviewed shortlist candidate establishes the complete atom under universal forward necessity. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "An old baseline, budget, precedent, or prior estimate is reused.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The reference exerts systematic unwarranted pull on a quantitative or scaled judgment, and adjustment remains insufficient.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The reference exerts systematic unwarranted pull on a quantitative or scaled judgment, and adjustment remains insufficient.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing anr_t3 loses group convergence; removing HR1 loses bias and insufficient adjustment.", "sufficiency_argument": "Rapid first-estimate convergence plus unwarranted residual pull entails the group-anchor route."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Anchoring requires individual or aggregate judgment pull under different anchor values, not rapid team convergence around a shared estimate.", "slug": "anchoring"}], "residual_id": "r:anchoring_reset:b003_a15_anr_t3", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No reviewed shortlist candidate establishes the complete atom under universal forward necessity."}}, "condition_id": "b003_a15_anr_t3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Common symptoms include estimates clustering around the first number, alternatives being evaluated relative to the initial option, a prior budget being copied forward, a first diagnosis shaping later evidence interpretation, or a strategic opening offer defining the perceived negotiation range. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A team converges quickly around the first plausible estimate.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A team converges quickly around the first plausible estimate.", "Common symptoms include estimates clustering around the first number, alternatives being evaluated relative to the initial option, a prior budget being copied forward, a first diagnosis shaping later evidence interpretation, or a strategic opening offer defining the perceived negotiation range."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Anchoring requires individual or aggregate judgment pull under different anchor values, not rapid team convergence around a shared estimate.", "slug": "anchoring"}], "normalized_requirement": "A team converges quickly around the first plausible estimate.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "No reviewed shortlist candidate establishes the complete atom under universal forward necessity. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A team converges quickly around the first plausible estimate.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The reference exerts systematic unwarranted pull on a quantitative or scaled judgment, and adjustment remains insufficient.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The reference exerts systematic unwarranted pull on a quantitative or scaled judgment, and adjustment remains insufficient.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The anchor came from a party with incentives to steer the decision.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The anchor came from a party with incentives to steer the decision. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The anchor came from a party with incentives to steer the decision."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "The anchor came from a party with incentives to steer the decision."}, {"display_text": "Judgment quality matters enough that reference-point error would propagate.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is weaker when the issue is not reference-point distortion. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: Judgment quality matters enough that reference-point error would propagate. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Judgment quality matters enough that reference-point error would propagate.", "It is weaker when the issue is not reference-point distortion."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Judgment quality matters enough that reference-point error would propagate."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 3, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-backfill-batch-003", "ledger_sha256": "e37a7b5048c6a3c1e51377152994fb7f49b2a6f5ab24b8e197275ba0d874a66b"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Antagonism Screening and Separation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:antagonism_screening_and_separation", "slug": "antagonism_screening_and_separation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 5, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 4, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 4 of 5 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is relational harm. A system evaluates parts independently, then combines them as if their individual value will simply carry over. In reality, the combination may create a new effect: the parts compete, contaminate, block, overload, contradict, or compromise one another.\n\nThis creates a recurring attribution error. Teams blame the feature, the rule, the role, or the intervention, when the actual problem is the pairing. Conversely, they may preserve a harmful bundle because each part has evidence in its favor. The archetype corrects both errors by shifting attention from isolated value to conditional co-occurrence.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Combined elements have a negative or credibly cross-purpose interaction, including coincidence-only failure, known incompatibility, conflict-of-interest risk, dependency conflict, or a planned bundle that may work at cross purposes."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing as_s2 eliminates the coincidence-only failure route entirely.", "sufficiency_argument": "Coincidence-only failure is itself a negative interaction among factors and therefore completes one canonical diagnostic route."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Its mandatory AND-path conducts only when several edge states coincide, none sufficient alone, and thereby produces the otherwise latent failure.", "role_mapping": "Simultaneously conducting edge states -> coincident factors; conducted path -> failure appearing only under conjunction.", "slug": "conjunctive_path_activation", "tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b004_a01_as_s2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Past failures appear only when two or more factors coincide. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Past failures appear only when two or more factors coincide."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER", "name": "Conjunctive Path Activation", "one_liner": "A latent causal path becomes live only when every state-conditional edge along it conducts at once, making the failure invisible to factor-by-factor audit.", "page_ref": "prime:conjunctive_path_activation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Simultaneously conducting edge states -> coincident factors; conducted path -> failure appearing only under conjunction.", "slug": "conjunctive_path_activation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Its mandatory AND-path conducts only when several edge states coincide, none sufficient alone, and thereby produces the otherwise latent failure."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Recorded failures occur only when two or more factors coincide, with no factor sufficient alone.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing as_s3 drops the known-incompatibility alternative from the source OR.", "sufficiency_argument": "A known incompatibility class directly establishes a credibly negative relation among combined elements."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "It requires a fixed domain and a proven jointly unsatisfiable set, establishing a known structural incompatibility class rather than a merely suspected conflict.", "role_mapping": "Jointly unsatisfiable axiom set -> known incompatibility class.", "slug": "axiomatic_incompatibility", "tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b004_a01_as_s3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A domain has known incompatibility classes, conflict-of-interest risks, or dependency conflicts. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A domain has known incompatibility classes, conflict-of-interest risks, or dependency conflicts."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER", "name": "Axiomatic Incompatibility", "one_liner": "A small set of individually plausible axioms is provably jointly unsatisfiable, forcing a chosen trade-off.", "page_ref": "prime:axiomatic_incompatibility", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Jointly unsatisfiable axiom set -> known incompatibility class.", "slug": "axiomatic_incompatibility", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "It requires a fixed domain and a proven jointly unsatisfiable set, establishing a known structural incompatibility class rather than a merely suspected conflict."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The domain contains known classes of mutually incompatible elements.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing as_s4 drops the conflict-of-interest alternative from the source OR.", "sufficiency_argument": "A conflict-of-interest risk directly establishes incompatible pulls that may degrade joint operation."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Its mandatory structure is incompatible duties or interests held by one decision-maker, producing a standing incentive risk even before misconduct occurs.", "role_mapping": "Incompatible duties or interests -> cross-purpose relation in a role structure.", "slug": "conflict_of_interest", "tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b004_a01_as_s4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A domain has known incompatibility classes, conflict-of-interest risks, or dependency conflicts. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A domain has known incompatibility classes, conflict-of-interest risks, or dependency conflicts."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER", "name": "Conflict of Interest", "one_liner": "Competing incentives.", "page_ref": "prime:conflict_of_interest", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Incompatible duties or interests -> cross-purpose relation in a role structure.", "slug": "conflict_of_interest", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Its mandatory structure is incompatible duties or interests held by one decision-maker, producing a standing incentive risk even before misconduct occurs."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The domain contains conflict-of-interest risks from incompatible duties or interests.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing as_s5 drops the dependency-conflict alternative from the source OR.", "sufficiency_argument": "A dependency conflict directly establishes a negative relation among jointly used elements."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "It requires receivers dependent on one shared interface whose binding acceptance rules have an empty joint feasible set, necessarily establishing a dependency conflict.", "role_mapping": "Receivers -> dependencies; empty intersection of binding acceptance rules -> dependency conflict.", "slug": "shared_interface_constraint_conflict", "tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b004_a01_as_s5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A domain has known incompatibility classes, conflict-of-interest risks, or dependency conflicts. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A domain has known incompatibility classes, conflict-of-interest risks, or dependency conflicts."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER", "name": "Shared-Interface Constraint Conflict", "one_liner": "Shared-interface constraint conflict forces one undifferentiated output through a common interface to receivers whose binding acceptance rules cannot all be satisfied, so success for one receiver entails failure for another until the interface or receiver set is partitioned.", "page_ref": "prime:shared_interface_constraint_conflict", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Receivers -> dependencies; empty intersection of binding acceptance rules -> dependency conflict.", "slug": "shared_interface_constraint_conflict", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "It requires receivers dependent on one shared interface whose binding acceptance rules have an empty joint feasible set, necessarily establishing a dependency conflict."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The domain contains conflicts among dependencies or their binding constraints.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing as_s6 eliminates the planned cross-purpose bundle route.", "sufficiency_argument": "A planned bundle that may work at cross purposes is exactly the fifth canonical negative-interaction route."}, "condition_set_id": "B5", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "It permits synergistic as well as antagonistic interaction and does not require a planned bundle.", "slug": "synergy_and_antagonism"}], "residual_id": "r:antagonism_screening_and_separation:b004_a01_as_s6", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No permitted definition universally preserves both the planned-bundle substrate and the modal possibility of cross-purpose effects."}}, "condition_id": "b004_a01_as_s6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system combines actors, interventions, materials, rules, incentives, processes, or components that each have a legitimate use, but their interaction can produce reduced effect, conflict, contamination, overload, safety risk, or mutual obstruction. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A planned bundle contains incentives, rules, or features that may work at cross purposes.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A planned bundle contains incentives, rules, or features that may work at cross purposes.", "A system combines actors, interventions, materials, rules, incentives, processes, or components that each have a legitimate use, but their interaction can produce reduced effect, conflict, contamination, overload, safety risk, or mutual obstruction."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "It permits synergistic as well as antagonistic interaction and does not require a planned bundle.", "slug": "synergy_and_antagonism"}], "normalized_requirement": "A planned bundle contains incentives, rules, or features that may work at cross purposes.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "No permitted definition universally preserves both the planned-bundle substrate and the modal possibility of cross-purpose effects. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A planned bundle contains incentives, rules, or features that may work at cross purposes.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 5", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "DISJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Useful elements will be activated, co-located, bundled, or scheduled together.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when useful elements may interfere with one another in combination. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Useful elements will be activated, co-located, bundled, or scheduled together. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Useful elements will be activated, co-located, bundled, or scheduled together.", "Use this archetype when useful elements may interfere with one another in combination."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "Useful elements will be activated, co-located, bundled, or scheduled together."}, {"display_text": "Separation, sequencing, or buffering could preserve value without abandoning the elements.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Antagonism Screening and Separation is for destructive interaction among otherwise plausible elements. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: Separation, sequencing, or buffering could preserve value without abandoning the elements. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Separation, sequencing, or buffering could preserve value without abandoning the elements.", "Antagonism Screening and Separation is for destructive interaction among otherwise plausible elements."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Separation, sequencing, or buffering could preserve value without abandoning the elements."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 4, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-backfill-batch-004", "ledger_sha256": "091757fe37265dd949bd23521d484a9fe559bc7b9af6d5cc2f2693c0074310b4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Anti-Herding Signal Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:anti_herding_signal_design", "slug": "anti_herding_signal_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 3, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 3 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is imitation under uncertainty. Each person observes a visible action, popularity count, ranking, price movement, majority view, or alarmed reaction and infers that others may know something. That inference may be reasonable at first. The problem emerges when later actors see mostly copied behavior and treat it as independent evidence. The result can be a bubble, panic, fad, rumor cascade, premature consensus, or group error.\n\nThe system loses information because private evidence is not expressed. People who are unsure copy the visible majority; people with contrary evidence stay quiet; algorithms rank what is already popular; and the next actor sees a stronger crowd cue than the last.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Actors observe others' actions, popularity counts, prices, rankings, recommendations, alarmed reactions, or majority opinions and infer that the crowd knows something. As imitation accumulates, the system can produce bubbles, panics, fads, rumor cascades, premature consensus, or group error even when many actors privately have contrary or uncertain evidence."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of a listed condition drops a relation or state retained by the frozen route reconciliation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The reconciled source-condition route states a sufficient remedy-free diagnostic pattern for this archetype."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Its sequential-copying structure requires earlier actors' choices to be visible to later actors.", "role_mapping": "Actors can observe other actors' choices directly or through visible choice indicators.", "slug": "information_cascade", "tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b004_a02_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Each person observes a visible action, popularity count, ranking, price movement, majority view, or alarmed reaction and infers that others may know something. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: People can see each other's actions or a proxy for those actions, such as likes, shares, prices, downloads, waitlists, ratings, majority votes, or visible exits.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["People can see each other's actions or a proxy for those actions, such as likes, shares,\nprices, downloads, waitlists, ratings, majority votes, or visible exits.", "Each person observes a visible action, popularity count, ranking, price movement, majority view, or alarmed reaction and infers that others may know something."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER", "name": "Information Cascade", "one_liner": "The sequential dynamic in which actors copy earlier actors' visible choices and suppress their own private signals, driving collective convergence that can be confidently wrong.", "page_ref": "prime:information_cascade", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Actors can observe other actors' choices directly or through visible choice indicators.", "slug": "information_cascade", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Its sequential-copying structure requires earlier actors' choices to be visible to later actors."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "People can see each other's actions or a proxy for those actions, such as likes, shares, prices, downloads, waitlists, ratings, majority votes, or visible exits.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "It covers a shown signal being mistaken for importance, but not the social source or its comparative ease against underlying evidence.", "slug": "salience_as_significance"}], "residual_id": "r:anti_herding_signal_design:b004_a02_c2", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No eligible definition entails that a visible social signal is easier to process or more salient than the underlying evidence it represents."}}, "condition_id": "b004_a02_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially relevant when the visible social cue is easier to notice than the underlying evidence, when early actions strongly shape later visibility, or when a wrong cascade would create serious harm. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The visible social signal is easier to interpret or more salient than underlying evidence, quality, risk, or uncertainty.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The visible social signal is easier to interpret or more salient than underlying evidence,\nquality, risk, or uncertainty.", "It is especially relevant when the visible social cue is easier to notice than the underlying evidence, when early actions strongly shape later visibility, or when a wrong cascade would create serious harm."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "It covers a shown signal being mistaken for importance, but not the social source or its comparative ease against underlying evidence.", "slug": "salience_as_significance"}], "normalized_requirement": "The visible social signal is easier to interpret or more salient than underlying evidence, quality, risk, or uncertainty.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "No eligible definition entails that a visible social signal is easier to process or more salient than the underlying evidence it represents. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The visible social signal is easier to interpret or more salient than underlying evidence, quality, risk, or uncertainty.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "It explicitly describes actors copying visible earlier choices while suppressing private signals, so observed choices need not be independent.", "role_mapping": "Uncertain actors use others' behavior as evidence even though those actors may also be copying.", "slug": "information_cascade", "tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b004_a02_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Actors observe others' actions, popularity counts, prices, rankings, recommendations,. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Actors face uncertainty and rationally look to others for clues, but those others may also be copying rather than independently knowing.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Actors face uncertainty and rationally look to others for clues, but those others may also\nbe copying rather than independently knowing.", "Actors observe others' actions, popularity counts, prices, rankings, recommendations,"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER", "name": "Information Cascade", "one_liner": "The sequential dynamic in which actors copy earlier actors' visible choices and suppress their own private signals, driving collective convergence that can be confidently wrong.", "page_ref": "prime:information_cascade", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Uncertain actors use others' behavior as evidence even though those actors may also be copying.", "slug": "information_cascade", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "It explicitly describes actors copying visible earlier choices while suppressing private signals, so observed choices need not be independent."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Actors face uncertainty and rationally look to others for clues, but those others may also be copying rather than independently knowing.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "It names imitation but does not require rapid convergence or any harmful consequence.", "slug": "herding_behavior"}], "residual_id": "r:anti_herding_signal_design:b004_a02_c6", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No eligible definition entails that rapid convergence itself causes material harm through amplified error, instability, or lost exploration."}}, "condition_id": "b004_a02_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The result can be a bubble, panic, fad, rumor cascade, premature consensus, or group error. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Rapid convergence would create material harm, such as panic, asset bubbles, bad group decisions, misinformation spread, or lost exploration.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Rapid convergence would create material harm, such as panic, asset bubbles, bad group\ndecisions, misinformation spread, or lost exploration.", "The result can be a bubble, panic, fad, rumor cascade, premature consensus, or group error."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "It names imitation but does not require rapid convergence or any harmful consequence.", "slug": "herding_behavior"}], "normalized_requirement": "Rapid convergence would create material harm, such as panic, asset bubbles, bad group decisions, misinformation spread, or lost exploration.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "No eligible definition entails that rapid convergence itself causes material harm through amplified error, instability, or lost exploration. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Rapid convergence would create material harm, such as panic, asset bubbles, bad group decisions, misinformation spread, or lost exploration.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of a listed condition drops a relation or state retained by the frozen route reconciliation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The reconciled source-condition route states a sufficient remedy-free diagnostic pattern for this archetype."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Its sequential-copying structure requires earlier actors' choices to be visible to later actors.", "role_mapping": "Actors can observe other actors' choices directly or through visible choice indicators.", "slug": "information_cascade", "tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b004_a02_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Each person observes a visible action, popularity count, ranking, price movement, majority view, or alarmed reaction and infers that others may know something. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: People can see each other's actions or a proxy for those actions, such as likes, shares, prices, downloads, waitlists, ratings, majority votes, or visible exits.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["People can see each other's actions or a proxy for those actions, such as likes, shares,\nprices, downloads, waitlists, ratings, majority votes, or visible exits.", "Each person observes a visible action, popularity count, ranking, price movement, majority view, or alarmed reaction and infers that others may know something."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER", "name": "Information Cascade", "one_liner": "The sequential dynamic in which actors copy earlier actors' visible choices and suppress their own private signals, driving collective convergence that can be confidently wrong.", "page_ref": "prime:information_cascade", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Actors can observe other actors' choices directly or through visible choice indicators.", "slug": "information_cascade", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Its sequential-copying structure requires earlier actors' choices to be visible to later actors."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "People can see each other's actions or a proxy for those actions, such as likes, shares, prices, downloads, waitlists, ratings, majority votes, or visible exits.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "It explicitly describes actors copying visible earlier choices while suppressing private signals, so observed choices need not be independent.", "role_mapping": "Uncertain actors use others' behavior as evidence even though those actors may also be copying.", "slug": "information_cascade", "tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b004_a02_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Actors observe others' actions, popularity counts, prices, rankings, recommendations,. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Actors face uncertainty and rationally look to others for clues, but those others may also be copying rather than independently knowing.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Actors face uncertainty and rationally look to others for clues, but those others may also\nbe copying rather than independently knowing.", "Actors observe others' actions, popularity counts, prices, rankings, recommendations,"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER", "name": "Information Cascade", "one_liner": "The sequential dynamic in which actors copy earlier actors' visible choices and suppress their own private signals, driving collective convergence that can be confidently wrong.", "page_ref": "prime:information_cascade", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Uncertain actors use others' behavior as evidence even though those actors may also be copying.", "slug": "information_cascade", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "It explicitly describes actors copying visible earlier choices while suppressing private signals, so observed choices need not be independent."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Actors face uncertainty and rationally look to others for clues, but those others may also be copying rather than independently knowing.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "It entails later copying of visible choices but not outsized effects on exposure, ordering, valuation, or access.", "slug": "information_cascade"}], "residual_id": "r:anti_herding_signal_design:b004_a02_c4", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No eligible definition entails that an initial selection can disproportionately shape later exposure, ordering, valuation, or availability."}}, "condition_id": "b004_a02_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially relevant when the visible social cue is easier to notice than the underlying evidence, when early actions strongly shape later visibility, or when a wrong cascade would create serious harm. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Early choices can disproportionately shape later visibility, rankings, prices, or access.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Early choices can disproportionately shape later visibility, rankings, prices, or access.", "It is especially relevant when the visible social cue is easier to notice than the underlying evidence, when early actions strongly shape later visibility, or when a wrong cascade would create serious harm."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "It entails later copying of visible choices but not outsized effects on exposure, ordering, valuation, or access.", "slug": "information_cascade"}], "normalized_requirement": "Early choices can disproportionately shape later visibility, rankings, prices, or access.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "No eligible definition entails that an initial selection can disproportionately shape later exposure, ordering, valuation, or availability. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Early choices can disproportionately shape later visibility, rankings, prices, or access.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "It names imitation but does not require rapid convergence or any harmful consequence.", "slug": "herding_behavior"}], "residual_id": "r:anti_herding_signal_design:b004_a02_c6", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No eligible definition entails that rapid convergence itself causes material harm through amplified error, instability, or lost exploration."}}, "condition_id": "b004_a02_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The result can be a bubble, panic, fad, rumor cascade, premature consensus, or group error. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Rapid convergence would create material harm, such as panic, asset bubbles, bad group decisions, misinformation spread, or lost exploration.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Rapid convergence would create material harm, such as panic, asset bubbles, bad group\ndecisions, misinformation spread, or lost exploration.", "The result can be a bubble, panic, fad, rumor cascade, premature consensus, or group error."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "It names imitation but does not require rapid convergence or any harmful consequence.", "slug": "herding_behavior"}], "normalized_requirement": "Rapid convergence would create material harm, such as panic, asset bubbles, bad group decisions, misinformation spread, or lost exploration.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "No eligible definition entails that rapid convergence itself causes material harm through amplified error, instability, or lost exploration. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Rapid convergence would create material harm, such as panic, asset bubbles, bad group decisions, misinformation spread, or lost exploration.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of a listed condition drops a relation or state retained by the frozen route reconciliation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The reconciled source-condition route states a sufficient remedy-free diagnostic pattern for this archetype."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Its sequential-copying structure requires earlier actors' choices to be visible to later actors.", "role_mapping": "Actors can observe other actors' choices directly or through visible choice indicators.", "slug": "information_cascade", "tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b004_a02_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Each person observes a visible action, popularity count, ranking, price movement, majority view, or alarmed reaction and infers that others may know something. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: People can see each other's actions or a proxy for those actions, such as likes, shares, prices, downloads, waitlists, ratings, majority votes, or visible exits.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["People can see each other's actions or a proxy for those actions, such as likes, shares,\nprices, downloads, waitlists, ratings, majority votes, or visible exits.", "Each person observes a visible action, popularity count, ranking, price movement, majority view, or alarmed reaction and infers that others may know something."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER", "name": "Information Cascade", "one_liner": "The sequential dynamic in which actors copy earlier actors' visible choices and suppress their own private signals, driving collective convergence that can be confidently wrong.", "page_ref": "prime:information_cascade", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Actors can observe other actors' choices directly or through visible choice indicators.", "slug": "information_cascade", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Its sequential-copying structure requires earlier actors' choices to be visible to later actors."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "People can see each other's actions or a proxy for those actions, such as likes, shares, prices, downloads, waitlists, ratings, majority votes, or visible exits.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "It explicitly describes actors copying visible earlier choices while suppressing private signals, so observed choices need not be independent.", "role_mapping": "Uncertain actors use others' behavior as evidence even though those actors may also be copying.", "slug": "information_cascade", "tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b004_a02_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Actors observe others' actions, popularity counts, prices, rankings, recommendations,. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Actors face uncertainty and rationally look to others for clues, but those others may also be copying rather than independently knowing.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Actors face uncertainty and rationally look to others for clues, but those others may also\nbe copying rather than independently knowing.", "Actors observe others' actions, popularity counts, prices, rankings, recommendations,"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER", "name": "Information Cascade", "one_liner": "The sequential dynamic in which actors copy earlier actors' visible choices and suppress their own private signals, driving collective convergence that can be confidently wrong.", "page_ref": "prime:information_cascade", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Uncertain actors use others' behavior as evidence even though those actors may also be copying.", "slug": "information_cascade", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "It explicitly describes actors copying visible earlier choices while suppressing private signals, so observed choices need not be independent."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Actors face uncertainty and rationally look to others for clues, but those others may also be copying rather than independently knowing.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "It entails minority-expression pressure but not the comparison between collective error cost and early correct-deviation cost.", "slug": "spiral_of_silence"}], "residual_id": "r:anti_herding_signal_design:b004_a02_c5", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No eligible definition entails the perceived cost asymmetry between joining a collective error and making an early correct deviation."}}, "condition_id": "b004_a02_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially relevant when the visible social cue is easier to notice than the underlying evidence, when early actions strongly shape later visibility, or when a wrong cascade would create serious harm. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The cost of being wrong with the crowd feels lower than the cost of being independently right too early.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The cost of being wrong with the crowd feels lower than the cost of being independently\nright too early.", "It is especially relevant when the visible social cue is easier to notice than the underlying evidence, when early actions strongly shape later visibility, or when a wrong cascade would create serious harm."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "It entails minority-expression pressure but not the comparison between collective error cost and early correct-deviation cost.", "slug": "spiral_of_silence"}], "normalized_requirement": "The cost of being wrong with the crowd feels lower than the cost of being independently right too early.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "No eligible definition entails the perceived cost asymmetry between joining a collective error and making an early correct deviation. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The cost of being wrong with the crowd feels lower than the cost of being independently right too early.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "It names imitation but does not require rapid convergence or any harmful consequence.", "slug": "herding_behavior"}], "residual_id": "r:anti_herding_signal_design:b004_a02_c6", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No eligible definition entails that rapid convergence itself causes material harm through amplified error, instability, or lost exploration."}}, "condition_id": "b004_a02_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The result can be a bubble, panic, fad, rumor cascade, premature consensus, or group error. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Rapid convergence would create material harm, such as panic, asset bubbles, bad group decisions, misinformation spread, or lost exploration.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Rapid convergence would create material harm, such as panic, asset bubbles, bad group\ndecisions, misinformation spread, or lost exploration.", "The result can be a bubble, panic, fad, rumor cascade, premature consensus, or group error."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "It names imitation but does not require rapid convergence or any harmful consequence.", "slug": "herding_behavior"}], "normalized_requirement": "Rapid convergence would create material harm, such as panic, asset bubbles, bad group decisions, misinformation spread, or lost exploration.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "No eligible definition entails that rapid convergence itself causes material harm through amplified error, instability, or lost exploration. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Rapid convergence would create material harm, such as panic, asset bubbles, bad group decisions, misinformation spread, or lost exploration.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 4, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-backfill-batch-004", "ledger_sha256": "091757fe37265dd949bd23521d484a9fe559bc7b9af6d5cc2f2693c0074310b4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Anticipatory Forecasting", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:anticipatory_forecasting", "slug": "anticipatory_forecasting"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 2, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 2 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is reactive operation in a partially forecastable environment. Signals exist, but the system does not convert them into timely preparation. By the time the future condition is certain, the useful preparation window has closed.\n\nThis creates avoidable surprise, emergency spending, capacity overload, rushed decisions, fragile plans, and repeated late responses. It can also create the opposite failure: overconfident preparation for a point forecast with no update or de-escalation path.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A reactive system has partially knowable future conditions whose advance signals are not converted into timely uncertainty-aware preparation, where preparation needs lead time or waiting for certainty degrades the response."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing af_s1 loses the lead-time route; removing HR1 loses future knowability, failed conversion, and reactivity.", "sufficiency_argument": "Lead-time-dependent preparation plus the shared reactive signal-conversion failure entails the full anticipatory-forecasting diagnosis."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Its mandatory pattern directs advance warning to dependents who need an adaptation window, and zero lead time is explicitly a failed notification rather than preparation.", "role_mapping": "Affected dependent's adaptation window -> preparation lead time.", "slug": "change_notification", "tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "It requires a distinct upstream preparatory action whose intermediate field state needs lead time to form before the focal action can benefit.", "role_mapping": "Intermediate field formation time -> preparation lead time.", "slug": "preparatory_field_conditioning", "tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b004_a03_af_s1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Preparation actions need lead time, such as staffing, procurement, capacity reservation, public warning, hedging, staging, redesign, or scheduling. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Preparation actions need lead time, such as staffing, procurement, capacity reservation, public warning, hedging, staging, redesign, or scheduling."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER", "name": "Change Notification", "one_liner": "Advance warning, directed at those who depend on a system, that it is about to change in a way they need lead time to prepare for.", "page_ref": "prime:change_notification", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Affected dependent's adaptation window -> preparation lead time.", "slug": "change_notification", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Its mandatory pattern directs advance warning to dependents who need an adaptation window, and zero lead time is explicitly a failed notification rather than preparation."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER", "name": "Preparatory Field Conditioning", "one_liner": "Change the environment or target-state before a later focal action so that action encounters a deliberately conditioned field, with upstream value mediated through an explicit state target, causal model, lead-time, and reversion window.", "page_ref": "prime:preparatory_field_conditioning", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Intermediate field formation time -> preparation lead time.", "slug": "preparatory_field_conditioning", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "It requires a distinct upstream preparatory action whose intermediate field state needs lead time to form before the focal action can benefit."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The actions needed to prepare require nontrivial lead time before they become effective.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "Partially knowable future conditions provide advance signals, but the system remains reactive because it fails to convert them into timely uncertainty-aware preparation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Partially knowable future conditions provide advance signals, but the system remains reactive because it fails to convert them into timely uncertainty-aware preparation.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing af_s2 loses the delay-degradation route; removing HR1 loses future knowability, failed conversion, and reactivity.", "sufficiency_argument": "Certainty-delay degradation plus the shared reactive signal-conversion failure entails the full alternative diagnosis."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Its mandatory co-rising information and intervention-cost curves mean that waiting until enough is known makes intervention expensive or impossible.", "role_mapping": "Increasing information with rising intervention cost -> certainty-seeking delay degrading response.", "slug": "collingridge_dilemma", "tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b004_a03_af_s2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This creates avoidable surprise, emergency spending, capacity overload, rushed decisions, fragile plans, and repeated late responses. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Waiting for certainty would make the response late, expensive, brittle, or impossible.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Waiting for certainty would make the response late, expensive, brittle, or impossible.", "This creates avoidable surprise, emergency spending, capacity overload, rushed decisions, fragile plans, and repeated late responses."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER", "name": "Collingridge Dilemma", "one_liner": "Information about a system's consequences rises as the cost of changing it rises, so the window where intervention is both informed and feasible may be narrow or absent.", "page_ref": "prime:collingridge_dilemma", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Increasing information with rising intervention cost -> certainty-seeking delay degrading response.", "slug": "collingridge_dilemma", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Its mandatory co-rising information and intervention-cost curves mean that waiting until enough is known makes intervention expensive or impossible."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Waiting for certainty would make the response late, expensive, brittle, or impossible.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "Partially knowable future conditions provide advance signals, but the system remains reactive because it fails to convert them into timely uncertainty-aware preparation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Partially knowable future conditions provide advance signals, but the system remains reactive because it fails to convert them into timely uncertainty-aware preparation.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A future demand, risk, failure, shortage, overload, opportunity, or environmental condition can be estimated before it arrives.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use Anticipatory Forecasting when a future demand, risk, shortage, overload, opportunity, or environmental condition can be estimated before it arrives and when preparation takes time. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: A future demand, risk, failure, shortage, overload, opportunity, or environmental condition can be estimated before it arrives. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A future demand, risk, failure, shortage, overload, opportunity, or environmental condition can be estimated before it arrives.", "Use Anticipatory Forecasting when a future demand, risk, shortage, overload, opportunity, or environmental condition can be estimated before it arrives and when preparation takes time."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "A future demand, risk, failure, shortage, overload, opportunity, or environmental condition can be estimated before it arrives."}, {"display_text": "The cost of modest preparation is justified by the risk of being unprepared, but overreaction remains possible.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use Anticipatory Forecasting when a future demand, risk, shortage, overload, opportunity, or environmental condition can be estimated before it arrives and when preparation takes time. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: The cost of modest preparation is justified by the risk of being unprepared, but overreaction remains possible. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The cost of modest preparation is justified by the risk of being unprepared, but overreaction remains possible.", "Use Anticipatory Forecasting when a future demand, risk, shortage, overload, opportunity, or environmental condition can be estimated before it arrives and when preparation takes time."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The cost of modest preparation is justified by the risk of being unprepared, but overreaction remains possible."}, {"display_text": "The decision can tolerate approximate forecasts if uncertainty and update rules are explicit.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It can also create the opposite failure: overconfident preparation for a point forecast with no update or de-escalation path. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: The decision can tolerate approximate forecasts if uncertainty and update rules are explicit. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The decision can tolerate approximate forecasts if uncertainty and update rules are explicit.", "It can also create the opposite failure: overconfident preparation for a point forecast with no update or de-escalation path."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The decision can tolerate approximate forecasts if uncertainty and update rules are explicit."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 4, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-backfill-batch-004", "ledger_sha256": "091757fe37265dd949bd23521d484a9fe559bc7b9af6d5cc2f2693c0074310b4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Anticipatory Offset Governance", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:anticipatory_offset_governance", "slug": "anticipatory_offset_governance"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 3, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 3 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A planned intervention is evaluated as if targets will hold behavior fixed, but forward-looking agents can infer the intervention and adjust in advance, partially or fully neutralizing the intended effect.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A planned intervention is evaluated as if targets will hold behavior fixed, but forward-looking agents can infer the intervention and adjust in advance, partially or fully neutralizing the intended effect."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of a listed condition drops a relation or state retained by the frozen route reconciliation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The reconciled source-condition route states a sufficient remedy-free diagnostic pattern for this archetype."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Its definition requires forward-looking actors to anticipate an intervention before adjusting.", "role_mapping": "Affected actors can anticipate a future intervention through notice, inference, or recurring-regime prediction.", "slug": "anticipatory_neutralization", "tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b004_a04_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A planned intervention is evaluated as if targets will hold behavior fixed, but forward-looking agents can infer the intervention and adjust in advance, partially or fully neutralizing the intended effect. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The affected actors receive advance notice, can infer an upcoming policy, or can predict a recurring enforcement or incentive regime.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The affected actors receive advance notice, can infer an upcoming policy, or can predict a recurring enforcement or incentive regime.", "A planned intervention is evaluated as if targets will hold behavior fixed, but forward-looking agents can infer the intervention and adjust in advance, partially or fully neutralizing the intended effect."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER", "name": "Anticipatory Neutralization", "one_liner": "Forward-looking agents pre-adjust to offset an anticipated intervention's intended effect.", "page_ref": "prime:anticipatory_neutralization", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Affected actors can anticipate a future intervention through notice, inference, or recurring-regime prediction.", "slug": "anticipatory_neutralization", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Its definition requires forward-looking actors to anticipate an intervention before adjusting."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The affected actors receive advance notice, can infer an upcoming policy, or can predict a recurring enforcement or incentive regime.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "It explicitly requires feasible pre-adjustment that offsets an anticipated intervention's intended effect.", "role_mapping": "Actors have feasible advance responses that weaken or redirect the intervention's intended effect.", "slug": "anticipatory_neutralization", "tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b004_a04_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A planned intervention is evaluated as if targets will hold behavior fixed, but forward-looking agents can infer the intervention and adjust in advance, partially or fully neutralizing the intended effect. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Actors have feasible pre-adjustment paths that reduce the intended effect, shift costs, accelerate activity before the rule changes, or move behavior outside the observed channel.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Actors have feasible pre-adjustment paths that reduce the intended effect, shift costs, accelerate activity before the rule changes, or move behavior outside the observed channel.", "A planned intervention is evaluated as if targets will hold behavior fixed, but forward-looking agents can infer the intervention and adjust in advance, partially or fully neutralizing the intended effect."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER", "name": "Anticipatory Neutralization", "one_liner": "Forward-looking agents pre-adjust to offset an anticipated intervention's intended effect.", "page_ref": "prime:anticipatory_neutralization", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Actors have feasible advance responses that weaken or redirect the intervention's intended effect.", "slug": "anticipatory_neutralization", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "It explicitly requires feasible pre-adjustment that offsets an anticipated intervention's intended effect."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Actors have feasible pre-adjustment paths that reduce the intended effect, shift costs, accelerate activity before the rule changes, or move behavior outside the observed channel.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime makes purposeful actor pre-adjustment causally responsible for the realized effect.", "role_mapping": "The outcome depends partly on strategic adaptation rather than solely on passive or material response.", "slug": "anticipatory_neutralization", "tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b004_a04_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The measured outcome depends on strategic behavior rather than only physical constraints or passive response. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The measured outcome depends on strategic behavior rather than only physical constraints or passive response."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER", "name": "Anticipatory Neutralization", "one_liner": "Forward-looking agents pre-adjust to offset an anticipated intervention's intended effect.", "page_ref": "prime:anticipatory_neutralization", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "The outcome depends partly on strategic adaptation rather than solely on passive or material response.", "slug": "anticipatory_neutralization", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime makes purposeful actor pre-adjustment causally responsible for the realized effect."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The measured outcome depends on strategic behavior rather than only physical constraints or passive response.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of a listed condition drops a relation or state retained by the frozen route reconciliation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The reconciled source-condition route states a sufficient remedy-free diagnostic pattern for this archetype."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Its definition requires forward-looking actors to anticipate an intervention before adjusting.", "role_mapping": "Affected actors can anticipate a future intervention through notice, inference, or recurring-regime prediction.", "slug": "anticipatory_neutralization", "tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b004_a04_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A planned intervention is evaluated as if targets will hold behavior fixed, but forward-looking agents can infer the intervention and adjust in advance, partially or fully neutralizing the intended effect. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The affected actors receive advance notice, can infer an upcoming policy, or can predict a recurring enforcement or incentive regime.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The affected actors receive advance notice, can infer an upcoming policy, or can predict a recurring enforcement or incentive regime.", "A planned intervention is evaluated as if targets will hold behavior fixed, but forward-looking agents can infer the intervention and adjust in advance, partially or fully neutralizing the intended effect."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER", "name": "Anticipatory Neutralization", "one_liner": "Forward-looking agents pre-adjust to offset an anticipated intervention's intended effect.", "page_ref": "prime:anticipatory_neutralization", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Affected actors can anticipate a future intervention through notice, inference, or recurring-regime prediction.", "slug": "anticipatory_neutralization", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Its definition requires forward-looking actors to anticipate an intervention before adjusting."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The affected actors receive advance notice, can infer an upcoming policy, or can predict a recurring enforcement or incentive regime.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The frozen reconciliation found that every valid anticipatory neutralization instance entails this complete atom under the stated role binding.", "role_mapping": "Mandatory anticipatory neutralization roles -> the corresponding actors, signals, states, or artifacts in the atom.", "slug": "anticipatory_neutralization", "tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b004_a04_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A planned intervention is evaluated as if targets will hold behavior fixed, but forward-looking agents can infer the intervention and adjust in advance, partially or fully neutralizing the intended effect. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Past interventions show smaller-than-modeled effects after announcement, delayed rollout, or repeated exposure.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Past interventions show smaller-than-modeled effects after announcement, delayed rollout, or repeated exposure.", "A planned intervention is evaluated as if targets will hold behavior fixed, but forward-looking agents can infer the intervention and adjust in advance, partially or fully neutralizing the intended effect."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER", "name": "Anticipatory Neutralization", "one_liner": "Forward-looking agents pre-adjust to offset an anticipated intervention's intended effect.", "page_ref": "prime:anticipatory_neutralization", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Mandatory anticipatory neutralization roles -> the corresponding actors, signals, states, or artifacts in the atom.", "slug": "anticipatory_neutralization", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The frozen reconciliation found that every valid anticipatory neutralization instance entails this complete atom under the stated role binding."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Past interventions show smaller-than-modeled effects after announcement, delayed rollout, or repeated exposure.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [], "residual_id": "r:anticipatory_offset_governance:b004_a04_c5", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "The final-method reconciliation, complete condition shortlist disposition, and bounded packet-pool scan found no qualifying prime."}}, "condition_id": "b004_a04_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The intervention changes expectations, prices, enforcement probabilities, access rules, reporting incentives, or timing rather than simply changing a material capability. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The intervention changes expectations, prices, enforcement probabilities, access rules, reporting incentives, or timing rather than simply changing a material capability."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The intervention changes expectations, prices, enforcement probabilities, access rules, reporting incentives, or timing rather than simply changing a material capability.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "The final-method reconciliation, complete condition shortlist disposition, and bounded packet-pool scan found no qualifying prime. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The intervention changes expectations, prices, enforcement probabilities, access rules, reporting incentives, or timing rather than simply changing a material capability.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of a listed condition drops a relation or state retained by the frozen route reconciliation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The reconciled source-condition route states a sufficient remedy-free diagnostic pattern for this archetype."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Its definition requires forward-looking actors to anticipate an intervention before adjusting.", "role_mapping": "Affected actors can anticipate a future intervention through notice, inference, or recurring-regime prediction.", "slug": "anticipatory_neutralization", "tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b004_a04_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A planned intervention is evaluated as if targets will hold behavior fixed, but forward-looking agents can infer the intervention and adjust in advance, partially or fully neutralizing the intended effect. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The affected actors receive advance notice, can infer an upcoming policy, or can predict a recurring enforcement or incentive regime.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The affected actors receive advance notice, can infer an upcoming policy, or can predict a recurring enforcement or incentive regime.", "A planned intervention is evaluated as if targets will hold behavior fixed, but forward-looking agents can infer the intervention and adjust in advance, partially or fully neutralizing the intended effect."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER", "name": "Anticipatory Neutralization", "one_liner": "Forward-looking agents pre-adjust to offset an anticipated intervention's intended effect.", "page_ref": "prime:anticipatory_neutralization", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Affected actors can anticipate a future intervention through notice, inference, or recurring-regime prediction.", "slug": "anticipatory_neutralization", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Its definition requires forward-looking actors to anticipate an intervention before adjusting."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The affected actors receive advance notice, can infer an upcoming policy, or can predict a recurring enforcement or incentive regime.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "It explicitly requires feasible pre-adjustment that offsets an anticipated intervention's intended effect.", "role_mapping": "Actors have feasible advance responses that weaken or redirect the intervention's intended effect.", "slug": "anticipatory_neutralization", "tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b004_a04_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A planned intervention is evaluated as if targets will hold behavior fixed, but forward-looking agents can infer the intervention and adjust in advance, partially or fully neutralizing the intended effect. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Actors have feasible pre-adjustment paths that reduce the intended effect, shift costs, accelerate activity before the rule changes, or move behavior outside the observed channel.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Actors have feasible pre-adjustment paths that reduce the intended effect, shift costs, accelerate activity before the rule changes, or move behavior outside the observed channel.", "A planned intervention is evaluated as if targets will hold behavior fixed, but forward-looking agents can infer the intervention and adjust in advance, partially or fully neutralizing the intended effect."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER", "name": "Anticipatory Neutralization", "one_liner": "Forward-looking agents pre-adjust to offset an anticipated intervention's intended effect.", "page_ref": "prime:anticipatory_neutralization", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Actors have feasible advance responses that weaken or redirect the intervention's intended effect.", "slug": "anticipatory_neutralization", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "It explicitly requires feasible pre-adjustment that offsets an anticipated intervention's intended effect."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Actors have feasible pre-adjustment paths that reduce the intended effect, shift costs, accelerate activity before the rule changes, or move behavior outside the observed channel.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "It compares containment and propagation on one graph, not subgroup adaptation against an authority's control-revision pace.", "slug": "response_vs_propagation_race"}], "residual_id": "r:anticipatory_offset_governance:b004_a04_c6", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No eligible definition entails that an adaptive subgroup can move sooner or more effectively than the controlling authority can revise controls."}}, "condition_id": "b004_a04_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The population contains sophisticated subgroups that can move sooner or more effectively than the designer can update controls. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The population contains sophisticated subgroups that can move sooner or more effectively than the designer can update controls."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "It compares containment and propagation on one graph, not subgroup adaptation against an authority's control-revision pace.", "slug": "response_vs_propagation_race"}], "normalized_requirement": "The population contains sophisticated subgroups that can move sooner or more effectively than the designer can update controls.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "No eligible definition entails that an adaptive subgroup can move sooner or more effectively than the controlling authority can revise controls. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The population contains sophisticated subgroups that can move sooner or more effectively than the designer can update controls.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 4, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-backfill-batch-004", "ledger_sha256": "091757fe37265dd949bd23521d484a9fe559bc7b9af6d5cc2f2693c0074310b4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Appearance vs. Reality Distinction Audit", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:appearance_vs_reality_distinction_audit", "slug": "appearance_vs_reality_distinction_audit"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 4, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 6, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 7 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 4 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 7}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A person or system treats appearances, reports, perceptions, instrument readings, or socially presented facts as if they directly established underlying reality, or conversely dismisses appearances because they are not already objective measurements. The result is confused evidence, overconfident claims, and decisions that fail to distinguish experience, observation, inference, and ontology.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A person or system either wrongly upgrades appearance to reality or wrongly dismisses appearance for not already being objective, and this produces confused evidence, overconfident claims, and decisions that collapse claim status."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing av_t1 loses this route's status anchor; removing HR1 loses the wrong treatment and all asserted consequences.", "sufficiency_argument": "Claim-status disagreement plus its connected erroneous treatment and three consequences entails the complete canonical head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "It entails incompatible accounts of an event, not disagreement about the claim's status category.", "slug": "rashomon_effect"}], "residual_id": "r:appearance_vs_reality_distinction_audit:b004_a05_av_t1", "residual_kind": "CATALOG_GAP_CANDIDATE", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "The full-catalog audit found no prime requiring both participant disagreement and this evidentiary or ontological status partition."}}, "condition_id": "b004_a05_av_t1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Participants disagree about whether a claim describes an experience, an observation, an inferred cause, an institutional fact, or mind-independent reality. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Participants disagree about whether a claim describes an experience, an observation, an inferred cause, an institutional fact, or mind-independent reality."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "It entails incompatible accounts of an event, not disagreement about the claim's status category.", "slug": "rashomon_effect"}], "normalized_requirement": "Participants disagree over whether a claim concerns experience, observation, inference, institutional fact, or observer-independent reality.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "CATALOG_GAP_CANDIDATE", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "The full-catalog audit found no prime requiring both participant disagreement and this evidentiary or ontological status partition. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Participants disagree over whether a claim concerns experience, observation, inference, institutional fact, or observer-independent reality.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The status disagreement is resolved by wrongly upgrading or dismissing appearance, producing confused evidence, overconfident claims, and status-collapsing decisions.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The status disagreement is resolved by wrongly upgrading or dismissing appearance, producing confused evidence, overconfident claims, and status-collapsing decisions.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing av_t2 loses the evidentiary divergence; removing HR2 loses erroneous treatment and consequences.", "sufficiency_argument": "Report-measurement divergence plus its connected mishandling and consequences entails the complete canonical head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "It necessarily compares a solicited first-person valuation with an externally observed consequential choice estimate and requires systematic divergence.", "role_mapping": "Solicited report -> subjective report; observed consequential choice estimate -> objective behavioral measurement; systematic mismatch -> divergence.", "slug": "stated_revealed_preference_gap", "tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b004_a05_av_t2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Subjective reports and objective measurements diverge, and neither can responsibly be ignored. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Subjective reports and objective measurements diverge, and neither can responsibly be ignored."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER", "name": "Stated–Revealed Preference Gap", "one_liner": "A reported preference and behavior under a real choice opportunity systematically diverge, so the mismatch must be analyzed as two differently distorted access channels rather than automatically treating either as the agent's true valuation.", "page_ref": "prime:stated_revealed_preference_gap", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Solicited report -> subjective report; observed consequential choice estimate -> objective behavioral measurement; systematic mismatch -> divergence.", "slug": "stated_revealed_preference_gap", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "It necessarily compares a solicited first-person valuation with an externally observed consequential choice estimate and requires systematic divergence."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A first-person report and an externally standardized measurement systematically diverge.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The report-measurement divergence is mishandled by wrongly upgrading or dismissing appearance, producing confused evidence, overconfident claims, and status-collapsing decisions.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The report-measurement divergence is mishandled by wrongly upgrading or dismissing appearance, producing confused evidence, overconfident claims, and status-collapsing decisions.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing av_t3 loses the upgrade; removing HR3 leaves the asserted consequence conjunction ungrounded.", "sufficiency_argument": "The silent linguistic upgrade supplies wrong appearance-to-reality treatment, and HR3 supplies all three required consequences."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Reification can be enacted nonlinguistically and therefore does not entail a silent language shift.", "slug": "reification"}], "residual_id": "r:appearance_vs_reality_distinction_audit:b004_a05_av_t3", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No permitted definition universally requires the specifically linguistic, silent shift from appearance-qualified to unqualified reality language."}}, "condition_id": "b004_a05_av_t3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A theory, report, dashboard, diagnosis, product evaluation, or policy argument uses language that silently shifts from “appears” to “is.” The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A theory, report, dashboard, diagnosis, product evaluation, or policy argument uses language that silently shifts from “appears” to “is.”"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Reification can be enacted nonlinguistically and therefore does not entail a silent language shift.", "slug": "reification"}], "normalized_requirement": "Language silently upgrades an appearance-qualified statement into an unqualified reality claim.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "No permitted definition universally requires the specifically linguistic, silent shift from appearance-qualified to unqualified reality language. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Language silently upgrades an appearance-qualified statement into an unqualified reality claim.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The silent appearance-to-reality language upgrade produces confused evidence, overconfident claims, and status-collapsing decisions.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The silent appearance-to-reality language upgrade produces confused evidence, overconfident claims, and status-collapsing decisions.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing HR4 drops the top-level dismissal alternative entirely.", "sufficiency_argument": "The residual-only dismissal arm explicitly supplies wrong dismissal of appearance and each of the three conjunctive consequences."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "Appearance is wrongly dismissed because it is not already objective, producing confused evidence, overconfident claims, and status-collapsing decisions.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Appearance is wrongly dismissed because it is not already objective, producing confused evidence, overconfident claims, and status-collapsing decisions.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A decision depends on evidence that is mediated by perception, testimony, instrumentation, interface display, measurement model, or social convention.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The result is confused evidence, overconfident claims, and decisions that fail to distinguish experience, observation, inference, and ontology. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: A decision depends on evidence that is mediated by perception, testimony, instrumentation, interface display, measurement model, or social convention. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A decision depends on evidence that is mediated by perception, testimony, instrumentation, interface display, measurement model, or social convention.", "The result is confused evidence, overconfident claims, and decisions that fail to distinguish experience, observation, inference, and ontology."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "A decision depends on evidence that is mediated by perception, testimony, instrumentation, interface display, measurement model, or social convention."}, {"display_text": "The domain has high stakes and a risk of either dismissing lived experience or overclaiming from limited observations.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The result is confused evidence, overconfident claims, and decisions that fail to distinguish experience, observation, inference, and ontology. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: The domain has high stakes and a risk of either dismissing lived experience or overclaiming from limited observations. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The domain has high stakes and a risk of either dismissing lived experience or overclaiming from limited observations.", "The result is confused evidence, overconfident claims, and decisions that fail to distinguish experience, observation, inference, and ontology."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The domain has high stakes and a risk of either dismissing lived experience or overclaiming from limited observations."}, {"display_text": "A claim needs different action implications depending on whether it is a report, observation, inference, or established reality claim.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Action requires making inferences from appearances, but appearances are mediated and partial; the system must preserve what experience and observation legitimately show without treating them as automatic access to all underlying reality. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: A claim needs different action implications depending on whether it is a report, observation, inference, or established reality claim. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A claim needs different action implications depending on whether it is a report, observation, inference, or established reality claim.", "Action requires making inferences from appearances, but appearances are mediated and partial; the system must preserve what experience and observation legitimately show without treating them as automatic access to all underlying reality."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "A claim needs different action implications depending on whether it is a report, observation, inference, or established reality claim."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 4, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-backfill-batch-004", "ledger_sha256": "091757fe37265dd949bd23521d484a9fe559bc7b9af6d5cc2f2693c0074310b4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Approach–Avoidance Decomposition", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:approach_avoidance_decomposition", "slug": "approach_avoidance_decomposition"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 3, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 3 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is fused ambivalence. The attractive and aversive parts of the goal are bundled together, so the decision appears to be a binary choice: pursue the whole package or avoid the whole package. This bundling creates oscillation. Actors move toward the desired value, encounter the aversive side, retreat, then return because the value remains attractive.\n\nThis pattern often gets mislabeled. Advocates may call it resistance, procrastination, lack of courage, or lack of buy-in. Skeptics may call it risk, realism, or not being ready. Both labels can be incomplete. The issue is that different forces are acting at the same time, and the decision environment has not separated them.\n\nThe unresolved tension is that the system needs both movement and protection. If movement dominates, real risks and costs may be ignored. If protection dominates, valuable opportunities may remain unreachable. The archetype creates a way to keep both kinds of information in view.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Actors repeatedly move toward and away from a valued goal because the reward, threat, cost, uncertainty, identity meaning, or effort load are fused into a single undifferentiated decision. The goal is attractive enough to keep returning to, but aversive enough to prevent stable commitment."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of a listed condition drops a relation or state retained by the frozen route reconciliation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The reconciled source-condition route states a sufficient remedy-free diagnostic pattern for this archetype."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A single valued and aversive goal that traps an actor in vacillation entails repeated movement toward and away from commitment.", "role_mapping": "A valued goal produces repeated delay, reversal, weak commitment, or reopened choice.", "slug": "approach_avoidance_conflict", "tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b004_a06_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when a person, team, stakeholder group, user population, or institution repeatedly circles a valued goal without making stable progress. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A person, team, user, or stakeholder group repeatedly says the goal matters but delays, reverses, under-commits, or reopens the decision.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A person, team, user, or stakeholder group repeatedly says the goal matters but delays, reverses, under-commits, or reopens the decision.", "Use this archetype when a person, team, stakeholder group, user population, or institution repeatedly circles a valued goal without making stable progress."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER", "name": "Approach-Avoidance Conflict", "one_liner": "A single goal that pulls and repels at once, where competing gradients balance at an intermediate point and trap the actor in vacillation.", "page_ref": "prime:approach_avoidance_conflict", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "A valued goal produces repeated delay, reversal, weak commitment, or reopened choice.", "slug": "approach_avoidance_conflict", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A single valued and aversive goal that traps an actor in vacillation entails repeated movement toward and away from commitment."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A person, team, user, or stakeholder group repeatedly says the goal matters but delays, reverses, under-commits, or reopens the decision.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Its defining structure is one goal that simultaneously pulls and repels the actor.", "role_mapping": "One option simultaneously carries a clear attraction and a clear aversive element.", "slug": "approach_avoidance_conflict", "tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b004_a06_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The goal has a real attraction, but the path also carries threat, cost, effort, status risk, uncertainty, or identity disruption. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The same option carries a clear benefit and a clear aversive element, such as status risk, effort burden, identity threat, loss exposure, social conflict, or uncertainty.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The same option carries a clear benefit and a clear aversive element, such as status risk, effort burden, identity threat, loss exposure, social conflict, or uncertainty.", "The goal has a real attraction, but the path also carries threat, cost, effort, status risk, uncertainty, or identity disruption."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER", "name": "Approach-Avoidance Conflict", "one_liner": "A single goal that pulls and repels at once, where competing gradients balance at an intermediate point and trap the actor in vacillation.", "page_ref": "prime:approach_avoidance_conflict", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "One option simultaneously carries a clear attraction and a clear aversive element.", "slug": "approach_avoidance_conflict", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Its defining structure is one goal that simultaneously pulls and repels the actor."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The same option carries a clear benefit and a clear aversive element, such as status risk, effort burden, identity threat, loss exposure, social conflict, or uncertainty.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of a listed condition drops a relation or state retained by the frozen route reconciliation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The reconciled source-condition route states a sufficient remedy-free diagnostic pattern for this archetype."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "It entails the coexistence of pull and resistance but not the insufficiency of the listed partial explanations.", "slug": "approach_avoidance_conflict"}], "residual_id": "r:approach_avoidance_decomposition:b004_a06_c3", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No eligible definition entails that several partial explanations each cover only part of a joint pattern in which attraction and resistance coexist."}}, "condition_id": "b004_a06_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Do not use it when the actor does not value the goal at all, when a hard ethical or safety boundary should stop action, or when the issue is better explained by a single neighboring pattern such as risk calibration, autonomy threat, low self-efficacy, or learned helplessness. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Risk calibration, autonomy support, or self-efficacy scaffolding explains part of the pattern but not the full coexistence of pull and resistance.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Risk calibration, autonomy support, or self-efficacy scaffolding explains part of the pattern but not the full coexistence of pull and resistance.", "Do not use it when the actor does not value the goal at all, when a hard ethical or safety boundary should stop action, or when the issue is better explained by a single neighboring pattern such as risk calibration, autonomy threat, low self-efficacy, or learned helplessness."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "It entails the coexistence of pull and resistance but not the insufficiency of the listed partial explanations.", "slug": "approach_avoidance_conflict"}], "normalized_requirement": "Risk calibration, autonomy support, or self-efficacy scaffolding explains part of the pattern but not the full coexistence of pull and resistance.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "No eligible definition entails that several partial explanations each cover only part of a joint pattern in which attraction and resistance coexist. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Risk calibration, autonomy support, or self-efficacy scaffolding explains part of the pattern but not the full coexistence of pull and resistance.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of a listed condition drops a relation or state retained by the frozen route reconciliation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The reconciled source-condition route states a sufficient remedy-free diagnostic pattern for this archetype."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "It captures pull and resistance but not alternating deliberation plus the absence of component decomposition.", "slug": "approach_avoidance_conflict"}], "residual_id": "r:approach_avoidance_decomposition:b004_a06_c4", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No eligible definition entails benefit-versus-burden deliberation that alternates while leaving separable components and their treatment options unmapped."}}, "condition_id": "b004_a06_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The goal has a real attraction, but the path also carries threat, cost, effort, status risk, uncertainty, or identity disruption. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Discussion alternates between selling the goal and defending against the cost, without decomposing which pieces can be preserved, reduced, bounded, or staged.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Discussion alternates between selling the goal and defending against the cost, without decomposing which pieces can be preserved, reduced, bounded, or staged.", "The goal has a real attraction, but the path also carries threat, cost, effort, status risk, uncertainty, or identity disruption."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "It captures pull and resistance but not alternating deliberation plus the absence of component decomposition.", "slug": "approach_avoidance_conflict"}], "normalized_requirement": "Discussion alternates between selling the goal and defending against the cost, without decomposing which pieces can be preserved, reduced, bounded, or staged.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "No eligible definition entails benefit-versus-burden deliberation that alternates while leaving separable components and their treatment options unmapped. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Discussion alternates between selling the goal and defending against the cost, without decomposing which pieces can be preserved, reduced, bounded, or staged.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The decision environment encourages all-or-nothing commitment even though a smaller test, redesigned path, or safeguard could produce useful evidence.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The issue is that different forces are acting at the same time, and the decision environment has not separated them. In this archetype, the relevant source condition requiring clarification is: The decision environment encourages all-or-nothing commitment even though a smaller test, redesigned path, or safeguard could produce useful evidence. The wording is retained for source review rather than assigned a stronger semantic role.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The decision environment encourages all-or-nothing commitment even though a smaller test, redesigned path, or safeguard could produce useful evidence.", "The issue is that different forces are acting at the same time, and the decision environment has not separated them."]}, "function": "MALFORMED", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because the source wording is not structurally clear enough to support a formal trigger role without clarification.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The decision environment encourages all-or-nothing commitment even though a smaller test, redesigned path, or safeguard could produce useful evidence."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 4, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-backfill-batch-004", "ledger_sha256": "091757fe37265dd949bd23521d484a9fe559bc7b9af6d5cc2f2693c0074310b4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Approximation-Target Divergence Mapping", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:approximation_target_divergence_mapping", "slug": "approximation_target_divergence_mapping"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 4, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 4 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A model, prototype, plan, performance, forecast, classification, or artifact is recognized as approximate, but the divergence between the approximation and the target is implicit, unevenly perceived, or poorly prioritized. Teams then refine by habit, salience, stakeholder pressure, available tools, or aesthetic polish rather than by the gap structure that determines whether the approximation is becoming more fit for purpose.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "An acknowledged approximation has a gap structure that is implicit, unevenly perceived, or poorly prioritized, causing actual refinement to follow local cues rather than the gaps that govern fitness to the target."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing at_s1 loses the known-departure contribution; removing HR1 loses the causal refinement failure.", "sufficiency_argument": "Several known departures plus the shared failure to expose and prioritize them for refinement entails the full diagnosis."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "It defines admissible variation but does not require a present approximation with several known departures.", "slug": "engineering_tolerances"}], "residual_id": "r:approximation_target_divergence_mapping:b004_a07_at_s1", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "After separating serviceability, no permitted candidate entails a current approximation with several simultaneously known target departures."}}, "condition_id": "b004_a07_at_s1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A current approximation is serviceable but known to miss the target in several ways. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A current approximation is serviceable but known to miss the target in several ways."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "It defines admissible variation but does not require a present approximation with several known departures.", "slug": "engineering_tolerances"}], "normalized_requirement": "The current approximation is known to depart from its target in several distinct ways.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "After separating serviceability, no permitted candidate entails a current approximation with several simultaneously known target departures. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The current approximation is known to depart from its target in several distinct ways.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The condition-specific gap information remains insufficiently visible or prioritized to govern refinement, causing actual refinement to follow local cues instead of the gap structure that determines target fitness.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The condition-specific gap information remains insufficiently visible or prioritized to govern refinement, causing actual refinement to follow local cues instead of the gap structure that determines target fitness.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing at_s2 loses severity heterogeneity; removing HR1 loses the visibility and causal refinement remainder.", "sufficiency_argument": "A benign-versus-consequential deviation partition plus the shared refinement-governance failure entails the full diagnosis."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Its mandatory tolerance boundary distinguishes conforming accepted variation from out-of-tolerance variation that causes rejection, rework, or functional failure, with nonuniform consequence sensitivity.", "role_mapping": "Acceptance interval -> harmless deviation region; out-of-tolerance consequence -> validity, safety, value, or acceptance threat.", "slug": "engineering_tolerances", "tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b004_a07_at_s2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Some deviations are harmless simplifications while others threaten validity, safety, value, or acceptance. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Some deviations are harmless simplifications while others threaten validity, safety, value, or acceptance."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER", "name": "Engineering Tolerances", "one_liner": "Acceptable variation.", "page_ref": "prime:engineering_tolerances", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Acceptance interval -> harmless deviation region; out-of-tolerance consequence -> validity, safety, value, or acceptance threat.", "slug": "engineering_tolerances", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Its mandatory tolerance boundary distinguishes conforming accepted variation from out-of-tolerance variation that causes rejection, rework, or functional failure, with nonuniform consequence sensitivity."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Some approximation deviations are benign simplifications while others threaten validity, safety, value, or acceptance.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The condition-specific gap information remains insufficiently visible or prioritized to govern refinement, causing actual refinement to follow local cues instead of the gap structure that determines target fitness.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The condition-specific gap information remains insufficiently visible or prioritized to govern refinement, causing actual refinement to follow local cues instead of the gap structure that determines target fitness.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing at_s3 loses stakeholder criterion conflict; removing HR1 loses the causal refinement remainder.", "sufficiency_argument": "Conflicting target-distance criteria plus the shared refinement-governance failure entails the uneven-perception route."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "It specifies a comparison rule but does not entail that different stakeholders adopt conflicting rules.", "slug": "similarity_measure"}], "residual_id": "r:approximation_target_divergence_mapping:b004_a07_at_s3", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No permitted candidate universally entails both stakeholder disagreement and conflicting criteria for reduced target distance."}}, "condition_id": "b004_a07_at_s3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Different stakeholders disagree about what “closer to target” means. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Different stakeholders disagree about what “closer to target” means."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "It specifies a comparison rule but does not entail that different stakeholders adopt conflicting rules.", "slug": "similarity_measure"}], "normalized_requirement": "Different stakeholders use conflicting criteria for judging whether the approximation is closer to its target.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "No permitted candidate universally entails both stakeholder disagreement and conflicting criteria for reduced target distance. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Different stakeholders use conflicting criteria for judging whether the approximation is closer to its target.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The condition-specific gap information remains insufficiently visible or prioritized to govern refinement, causing actual refinement to follow local cues instead of the gap structure that determines target fitness.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The condition-specific gap information remains insufficiently visible or prioritized to govern refinement, causing actual refinement to follow local cues instead of the gap structure that determines target fitness.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing at_s4 loses the local-versus-whole trend; removing HR1 loses its gap-governance causal context.", "sufficiency_argument": "Local improvement without whole-target fit plus the shared visibility and prioritization failure entails the fourth route."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Its mandatory failure signature is proxy improvement while independent target measures stagnate or worsen, exactly the local-versus-whole trend.", "role_mapping": "Proxy improvement -> local improvement; independent target stagnation or worsening -> absent whole-target improvement.", "slug": "proxy_target_divergence", "tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b004_a07_at_s4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A prototype, model, or performance keeps improving locally without improving overall fit. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A prototype, model, or performance keeps improving locally without improving overall fit."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER", "name": "Proxy-Target Divergence", "one_liner": "An apparatus calibrated against a proxy keeps operating on it after the proxy-target relationship has silently decoupled.", "page_ref": "prime:proxy_target_divergence", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Proxy improvement -> local improvement; independent target stagnation or worsening -> absent whole-target improvement.", "slug": "proxy_target_divergence", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Its mandatory failure signature is proxy improvement while independent target measures stagnate or worsen, exactly the local-versus-whole trend."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "An approximation keeps improving locally without a corresponding improvement in whole-target fit.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The condition-specific gap information remains insufficiently visible or prioritized to govern refinement, causing actual refinement to follow local cues instead of the gap structure that determines target fitness.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The condition-specific gap information remains insufficiently visible or prioritized to govern refinement, causing actual refinement to follow local cues instead of the gap structure that determines target fitness.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Refinement effort is scarce and not all gaps can be closed at once.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: Refinement effort is scarce and not all gaps can be closed at once. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Refinement effort is scarce and not all gaps can be closed at once."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Refinement effort is scarce and not all gaps can be closed at once."}, {"display_text": "The target itself is measurable only through proxies, benchmarks, or qualitative criteria.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: The target itself is measurable only through proxies, benchmarks, or qualitative criteria. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The target itself is measurable only through proxies, benchmarks, or qualitative criteria."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The target itself is measurable only through proxies, benchmarks, or qualitative criteria."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 4, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-backfill-batch-004", "ledger_sha256": "091757fe37265dd949bd23521d484a9fe559bc7b9af6d5cc2f2693c0074310b4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Arbitrage Capture", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:arbitrage_capture", "slug": "arbitrage_capture"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 2, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 2 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 1 of 2 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 2}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a mismatch across a boundary. A boundary can be a market, organization, region, jurisdiction, time window, data format, rule regime, supply-chain tier, or social context. The mismatch becomes actionable only when the object of value remains comparable enough after crossing that boundary.\n\nThe underlying tension is that boundaries create both inefficiency and protection. They can hide underused resources and stale prices, but they can also preserve local quality, safety, rights, privacy, and resilience. Arbitrage Capture works when crossing the boundary releases legitimate value; it fails when crossing the boundary merely bypasses responsibilities.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "The same comparable or transferable item has different context-dependent evaluative or practical status in value, cost, access, urgency, usability, or meaning."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing ac_s1 leaves no literal establishing either comparability or a cross-context status difference.", "sufficiency_argument": "A comparable item with different value across contexts instantiates the value arm of the complete evaluative-or-practical-status head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Its mandatory invariant fixes identical or equivalent claims with divergent prices across venues, which is a comparable item assigned different financial value across contexts.", "role_mapping": "Equivalent financial claim -> comparable claim; venue -> context; divergent executable price -> different financial value.", "slug": "arbitrage_finance", "tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "Its mandatory structure requires a cross-boundary discrepancy in price, value, quality, or perception that a bridging actor can exploit, establishing this unqualified value-difference core.", "role_mapping": "Bridgeable object -> comparable or transferable item; boundary sides -> contexts; discrepancy -> contextual value.", "slug": "arbitrage_generalized", "tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "It keeps focal alternatives fixed across comparison contexts while their ordering or choice probability changes, necessarily assigning different relative value to comparable alternatives across contexts.", "role_mapping": "Fixed focal alternative -> opportunity; comparison condition -> context; ordering or choice probability -> relative value.", "slug": "context_dependent_preference", "tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The same higher-grade good is assigned enforced nominal parity in one channel and its higher quality value in a price-discriminating channel.", "role_mapping": "High-grade good -> resource; enforced-parity and price-discriminating channels -> contexts; exchange valuation -> value.", "slug": "greshams_law", "tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "Mass requires the same finite resource to have a decisive nonlinear return at one point rather than the return available when dispersed elsewhere.", "role_mapping": "Finite resource -> resource; decisive-point and dispersed allocations -> contexts; threshold payoff -> practical value.", "slug": "mass", "tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "It requires heterogeneous willingness to pay and a segment-specific pricing architecture for the same product class, thereby establishing different assigned value across buyer contexts.", "role_mapping": "Same product class -> comparable resource or opportunity; buyer segment -> context; willingness-to-pay and price -> value.", "slug": "price_discrimination", "tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The same held surplus is deliberately low-use in the nominal context and decisive under a named contingency, necessarily changing its practical value by context.", "role_mapping": "Held surplus -> resource; nominal-load and contingency-load regimes -> contexts; idle versus failure-absorbing contribution -> practical value.", "slug": "reserve", "tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "It requires a fixed nominal signal whose informativeness changes as issuance and recipient standards change, so a comparable signal has different informational value across contexts.", "role_mapping": "Nominal marker -> signal; issuance/reader-standard regimes -> contexts; informativeness -> value.", "slug": "signal_devaluation", "tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b004_a08_ac_s1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A comparable resource, claim, capability, signal, or opportunity has materially different value across contexts. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A comparable resource, claim, capability, signal, or opportunity has materially different value across contexts."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER", "name": "Arbitrage (Finance)", "one_liner": "Exploits mismatches.", "page_ref": "prime:arbitrage_finance", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Equivalent financial claim -> comparable claim; venue -> context; divergent executable price -> different financial value.", "slug": "arbitrage_finance", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Its mandatory invariant fixes identical or equivalent claims with divergent prices across venues, which is a comparable item assigned different financial value across contexts."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER", "name": "Arbitrage (Generalized)", "one_liner": "Exploiting a discrepancy in price, value, or perception across a boundary that friction keeps from equilibrating, extracting the spread until it closes.", "page_ref": "prime:arbitrage_generalized", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Bridgeable object -> comparable or transferable item; boundary sides -> contexts; discrepancy -> contextual value.", "slug": "arbitrage_generalized", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Its mandatory structure requires a cross-boundary discrepancy in price, value, quality, or perception that a bridging actor can exploit, establishing this unqualified value-difference core."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER", "name": "Context-Dependent Preference", "one_liner": "Keep the focal options fixed while changing an unchosen comparator, menu, or evaluation procedure, and the ordering among those focal options can change because value is constructed relative to that context.", "page_ref": "prime:context_dependent_preference", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Fixed focal alternative -> opportunity; comparison condition -> context; ordering or choice probability -> relative value.", "slug": "context_dependent_preference", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "It keeps focal alternatives fixed across comparison contexts while their ordering or choice probability changes, necessarily assigning different relative value to comparable alternatives across contexts."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER", "name": "Gresham's Law", "one_liner": "Under enforced price parity over goods of differing quality, holders withdraw the better good and the worse good concentrates in the channel.", "page_ref": "prime:greshams_law", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "High-grade good -> resource; enforced-parity and price-discriminating channels -> contexts; exchange valuation -> value.", "slug": "greshams_law", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The same higher-grade good is assigned enforced nominal parity in one channel and its higher quality value in a price-discriminating channel."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER", "name": "Mass", "one_liner": "Concentrating finite resource on a single decisive point against a nonlinear response curve, rather than spreading the same resource thinly across all points.", "page_ref": "prime:mass", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Finite resource -> resource; decisive-point and dispersed allocations -> contexts; threshold payoff -> practical value.", "slug": "mass", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Mass requires the same finite resource to have a decisive nonlinear return at one point rather than the return available when dispersed elsewhere."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER", "name": "Price Discrimination", "one_liner": "Variable pricing.", "page_ref": "prime:price_discrimination", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Same product class -> comparable resource or opportunity; buyer segment -> context; willingness-to-pay and price -> value.", "slug": "price_discrimination", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "It requires heterogeneous willingness to pay and a segment-specific pricing architecture for the same product class, thereby establishing different assigned value across buyer contexts."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER", "name": "Reserve", "one_liner": "Deliberately maintained surplus held beyond expected need so the system can absorb variation, uncertainty, or shock without failing.", "page_ref": "prime:reserve", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Held surplus -> resource; nominal-load and contingency-load regimes -> contexts; idle versus failure-absorbing contribution -> practical value.", "slug": "reserve", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The same held surplus is deliberately low-use in the nominal context and decisive under a named contingency, necessarily changing its practical value by context."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "CONSENSUS_TRIGGER", "name": "Signal Devaluation", "one_liner": "A signal erodes in informativeness as issuance expands and readers adapt.", "page_ref": "prime:signal_devaluation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Nominal marker -> signal; issuance/reader-standard regimes -> contexts; informativeness -> value.", "slug": "signal_devaluation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "It requires a fixed nominal signal whose informativeness changes as issuance and recipient standards change, so a comparable signal has different informational value across contexts."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A comparable resource, claim, capability, signal, or opportunity has different value across contexts.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing HR1 drops all cost, access, urgency, usability, and meaning alternatives from the diagnostic head.", "sufficiency_argument": "HR1 directly preserves the source-free alternative in which another one of the five practical-status axes differs across contexts."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The same comparable or transferable item differs between contexts in cost, access, urgency, usability, or meaning rather than value.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The same comparable or transferable item differs between contexts in cost, access, urgency, usability, or meaning rather than value.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "DISJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The thing can be moved, translated, converted, scheduled, disclosed, pooled, or brokered across the boundary.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The structural problem is a mismatch across a boundary. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: The thing can be moved, translated, converted, scheduled, disclosed, pooled, or brokered across the boundary. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The thing can be moved, translated, converted, scheduled, disclosed, pooled, or brokered across the boundary.", "The structural problem is a mismatch across a boundary."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "The thing can be moved, translated, converted, scheduled, disclosed, pooled, or brokered across the boundary."}, {"display_text": "The net gain remains positive after transaction costs, risk, compliance, quality loss, and coordination burden.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The difference may persist because actors are separated by boundaries, information lags, rule regimes, transaction costs, format barriers, geography, timing, liquidity constraints, or institutional habits. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: The net gain remains positive after transaction costs, risk, compliance, quality loss, and coordination burden. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The net gain remains positive after transaction costs, risk, compliance, quality loss, and coordination burden.", "The difference may persist because actors are separated by boundaries, information lags, rule regimes, transaction costs, format barriers, geography, timing, liquidity constraints, or institutional habits."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "The net gain remains positive after transaction costs, risk, compliance, quality loss, and coordination burden."}, {"display_text": "Equivalence or acceptability can be verified in the target context.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: Equivalence or acceptability can be verified in the target context. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Equivalence or acceptability can be verified in the target context."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Equivalence or acceptability can be verified in the target context."}, {"display_text": "The mismatch is temporary, underused, hidden, or self-correcting if enough actors act on it.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The mismatch becomes actionable only when the object of value remains comparable enough after crossing that boundary. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The mismatch is temporary, underused, hidden, or self-correcting if enough actors act on it. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The mismatch is temporary, underused, hidden, or self-correcting if enough actors act on it.", "The mismatch becomes actionable only when the object of value remains comparable enough after crossing that boundary."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The mismatch is temporary, underused, hidden, or self-correcting if enough actors act on it."}, {"display_text": "Crossing the boundary is legitimate and does not evade intended protections.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Arbitrage Capture works when crossing the boundary releases legitimate value; it fails when crossing the boundary merely bypasses responsibilities. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: Crossing the boundary is legitimate and does not evade intended protections. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Crossing the boundary is legitimate and does not evade intended protections.", "Arbitrage Capture works when crossing the boundary releases legitimate value; it fails when crossing the boundary merely bypasses responsibilities."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Crossing the boundary is legitimate and does not evade intended protections."}, {"display_text": "The actor has liquidity, access, trust, or operational capacity to move before the opportunity expires.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The difference may persist because actors are separated by boundaries, information lags, rule regimes, transaction costs, format barriers, geography, timing, liquidity constraints, or institutional habits. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: The actor has liquidity, access, trust, or operational capacity to move before the opportunity expires. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The actor has liquidity, access, trust, or operational capacity to move before the opportunity expires.", "The difference may persist because actors are separated by boundaries, information lags, rule regimes, transaction costs, format barriers, geography, timing, liquidity constraints, or institutional habits."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "The actor has liquidity, access, trust, or operational capacity to move before the opportunity expires."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 4, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-backfill-batch-004", "ledger_sha256": "091757fe37265dd949bd23521d484a9fe559bc7b9af6d5cc2f2693c0074310b4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Arbitrage Prevention Mechanism Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:arbitrage_prevention_mechanism_design", "slug": "arbitrage_prevention_mechanism_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 2, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 2 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A provider offers different prices, versions, or access terms to different buyer segments, but buyers or intermediaries can convert the low-price option into a substitute for the high-price option. Segment boundaries collapse through resale, sharing, eligibility laundering, channel leakage, geographic arbitrage, timing exploitation, or product similarity, undermining the pricing logic and sometimes the fairness purpose of the offer.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A provider offers different prices, versions, or access terms to different buyer segments, but buyers or intermediaries can convert the low-price option into a substitute for the high-price option. Segment boundaries collapse through resale, sharing, eligibility laundering, channel leakage, geographic arbitrage, timing exploitation, or product similarity, undermining the pricing logic and sometimes the fairness purpose of the offer."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of a listed condition drops a relation or state retained by the frozen route reconciliation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The reconciled source-condition route states a sufficient remedy-free diagnostic pattern for this archetype."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Its structure requires a seller to offer the same product under differentiated segment prices.", "role_mapping": "An identical or substitutable offer is available under differentiated prices.", "slug": "price_discrimination", "tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b004_a09_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A provider offers different prices, versions, or access terms to different buyer segments, but buyers or intermediaries can convert the low-price option into a substitute for the high-price option. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The same or effectively similar good, service, entitlement, license, ticket, subsidy, or access right is offered under different prices or conditions.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The same or effectively similar good, service, entitlement, license, ticket, subsidy, or access right is offered under different prices or conditions.", "A provider offers different prices, versions, or access terms to different buyer segments, but buyers or intermediaries can convert the low-price option into a substitute for the high-price option."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER", "name": "Price Discrimination", "one_liner": "Variable pricing.", "page_ref": "prime:price_discrimination", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "An identical or substitutable offer is available under differentiated prices.", "slug": "price_discrimination", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Its structure requires a seller to offer the same product under differentiated segment prices."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The same or effectively similar good, service, entitlement, license, ticket, subsidy, or access right is offered under different prices or conditions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Its definition requires heterogeneous buyer willingness to pay and observable or inferable segmentation.", "role_mapping": "Recipient groups differ on an allocation-relevant valuation dimension.", "slug": "price_discrimination", "tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b004_a09_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Segment boundaries collapse through resale, sharing, eligibility laundering, channel leakage, geographic arbitrage, timing exploitation, or product similarity, undermining the pricing logic and sometimes the fairness purpose of the offer. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Segments differ in willingness to pay, urgency, eligibility, purchasing power, usage scale, or policy purpose.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Segments differ in willingness to pay, urgency, eligibility, purchasing power, usage scale, or policy purpose.", "Segment boundaries collapse through resale, sharing, eligibility laundering, channel leakage, geographic arbitrage, timing exploitation, or product similarity, undermining the pricing logic and sometimes the fairness purpose of the offer."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER", "name": "Price Discrimination", "one_liner": "Variable pricing.", "page_ref": "prime:price_discrimination", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Recipient groups differ on an allocation-relevant valuation dimension.", "slug": "price_discrimination", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Its definition requires heterogeneous buyer willingness to pay and observable or inferable segmentation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Segments differ in willingness to pay, urgency, eligibility, purchasing power, usage scale, or policy purpose.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "It entails differentiated segments and prices but not that the protected offer attracts outsiders.", "slug": "price_discrimination"}], "residual_id": "r:arbitrage_prevention_mechanism_design:b004_a09_c3", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No eligible definition entails that an offer reserved for one group has enough value to attract actors outside that group."}}, "condition_id": "b004_a09_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A provider offers different prices, versions, or access terms to different buyer segments, but buyers or intermediaries can convert the low-price option into a substitute for the high-price option. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A lower-priced or restricted offer is attractive enough to buyers outside the intended segment.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A lower-priced or restricted offer is attractive enough to buyers outside the intended segment.", "A provider offers different prices, versions, or access terms to different buyer segments, but buyers or intermediaries can convert the low-price option into a substitute for the high-price option."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "It entails differentiated segments and prices but not that the protected offer attracts outsiders.", "slug": "price_discrimination"}], "normalized_requirement": "A lower-priced or restricted offer is attractive enough to buyers outside the intended segment.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "No eligible definition entails that an offer reserved for one group has enough value to attract actors outside that group. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A lower-priced or restricted offer is attractive enough to buyers outside the intended segment.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Exploiting a cross-boundary value discrepancy entails that the lower-valued form can cross the boundary through some conversion path.", "role_mapping": "The differentiated offer can cross group boundaries through a transfer or conversion channel.", "slug": "arbitrage_generalized", "tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b004_a09_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Segment boundaries collapse through resale, sharing, eligibility laundering, channel leakage, geographic arbitrage, timing exploitation, or product similarity, undermining the pricing logic and sometimes the fairness purpose of the offer. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The low-price offer can be resold, shared, transferred, bulk-purchased, repackaged, or accessed through a weak channel boundary.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The low-price offer can be resold, shared, transferred, bulk-purchased, repackaged, or accessed through a weak channel boundary.", "Segment boundaries collapse through resale, sharing, eligibility laundering, channel leakage, geographic arbitrage, timing exploitation, or product similarity, undermining the pricing logic and sometimes the fairness purpose of the offer."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER", "name": "Arbitrage (Generalized)", "one_liner": "Exploiting a discrepancy in price, value, or perception across a boundary that friction keeps from equilibrating, extracting the spread until it closes.", "page_ref": "prime:arbitrage_generalized", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "The differentiated offer can cross group boundaries through a transfer or conversion channel.", "slug": "arbitrage_generalized", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Exploiting a cross-boundary value discrepancy entails that the lower-valued form can cross the boundary through some conversion path."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The low-price offer can be resold, shared, transferred, bulk-purchased, repackaged, or accessed through a weak channel boundary.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of a listed condition drops a relation or state retained by the frozen route reconciliation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The reconciled source-condition route states a sufficient remedy-free diagnostic pattern for this archetype."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Its structure requires a seller to offer the same product under differentiated segment prices.", "role_mapping": "An identical or substitutable offer is available under differentiated prices.", "slug": "price_discrimination", "tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b004_a09_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A provider offers different prices, versions, or access terms to different buyer segments, but buyers or intermediaries can convert the low-price option into a substitute for the high-price option. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The same or effectively similar good, service, entitlement, license, ticket, subsidy, or access right is offered under different prices or conditions.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The same or effectively similar good, service, entitlement, license, ticket, subsidy, or access right is offered under different prices or conditions.", "A provider offers different prices, versions, or access terms to different buyer segments, but buyers or intermediaries can convert the low-price option into a substitute for the high-price option."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER", "name": "Price Discrimination", "one_liner": "Variable pricing.", "page_ref": "prime:price_discrimination", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "An identical or substitutable offer is available under differentiated prices.", "slug": "price_discrimination", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Its structure requires a seller to offer the same product under differentiated segment prices."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The same or effectively similar good, service, entitlement, license, ticket, subsidy, or access right is offered under different prices or conditions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Its defining operation exploits a cross-boundary discrepancy, which entails observed or credible cross-group diversion.", "role_mapping": "Cross-group diversion or substitution is observed or credibly expected.", "slug": "arbitrage_generalized", "tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b004_a09_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Segment boundaries collapse through resale, sharing, eligibility laundering, channel leakage, geographic arbitrage, timing exploitation, or product similarity, undermining the pricing logic and sometimes the fairness purpose of the offer. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Leakage, cannibalization, gray-market redistribution, or account sharing is already visible or likely.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Leakage, cannibalization, gray-market redistribution, or account sharing is already visible or likely.", "Segment boundaries collapse through resale, sharing, eligibility laundering, channel leakage, geographic arbitrage, timing exploitation, or product similarity, undermining the pricing logic and sometimes the fairness purpose of the offer."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER", "name": "Arbitrage (Generalized)", "one_liner": "Exploiting a discrepancy in price, value, or perception across a boundary that friction keeps from equilibrating, extracting the spread until it closes.", "page_ref": "prime:arbitrage_generalized", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Cross-group diversion or substitution is observed or credibly expected.", "slug": "arbitrage_generalized", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Its defining operation exploits a cross-boundary discrepancy, which entails observed or credible cross-group diversion."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Leakage, cannibalization, gray-market redistribution, or account sharing is already visible or likely.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The provider wants to preserve a discount, subsidy, regional price, student/nonprofit/resident tier, or versioning strategy without abandoning the differential offer.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A provider offers different prices, versions, or access terms to different buyer segments, but buyers or intermediaries can convert the low-price option into a substitute for the high-price option. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: The provider wants to preserve a discount, subsidy, regional price, student/nonprofit/resident tier, or versioning strategy without abandoning the differential offer. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The provider wants to preserve a discount, subsidy, regional price, student/nonprofit/resident tier, or versioning strategy without abandoning the differential offer.", "A provider offers different prices, versions, or access terms to different buyer segments, but buyers or intermediaries can convert the low-price option into a substitute for the high-price option."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The provider wants to preserve a discount, subsidy, regional price, student/nonprofit/resident tier, or versioning strategy without abandoning the differential offer."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 4, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-backfill-batch-004", "ledger_sha256": "091757fe37265dd949bd23521d484a9fe559bc7b9af6d5cc2f2693c0074310b4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Archetype Overmatching Guardrail", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:archetype_overmatching_guardrail", "slug": "archetype_overmatching_guardrail"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 3, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 5, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 6 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 3 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A current case is interpreted through a familiar archetype before its structural fit has been demonstrated. Because the archetype is recognizable, prestigious, emotionally charged, or recently salient, people stop looking for disconfirming features and allow the proposed pattern to drive diagnosis, design, or response.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A current case is interpreted through a familiar archetype before its structural fit has been demonstrated. Because the archetype is recognizable, prestigious, emotionally charged, or recently salient, people stop looking for disconfirming features and allow the proposed pattern to drive diagnosis, design, or response."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of a listed condition drops a relation or state retained by the frozen route reconciliation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The reconciled source-condition route states a sufficient remedy-free diagnostic pattern for this archetype."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The frozen reconciliation found that every valid pattern recognition instance entails this complete atom under the stated role binding.", "role_mapping": "Mandatory pattern recognition roles -> the corresponding actors, signals, states, or artifacts in the atom.", "slug": "pattern_recognition", "tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b004_a10_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A current case is interpreted through a familiar archetype before its structural fit has been demonstrated. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A familiar archetype appears to explain a new case.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A familiar archetype appears to explain a new case", "A current case is interpreted through a familiar archetype before its structural fit has been demonstrated."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER", "name": "Pattern Recognition", "one_liner": "Identify regularities.", "page_ref": "prime:pattern_recognition", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Mandatory pattern recognition roles -> the corresponding actors, signals, states, or artifacts in the atom.", "slug": "pattern_recognition", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The frozen reconciliation found that every valid pattern recognition instance entails this complete atom under the stated role binding."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A familiar archetype appears to explain a new case", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "It names interpreting ambiguity but does not entail high ambiguity or compressed time in the case itself.", "slug": "sensemaking"}], "residual_id": "r:archetype_overmatching_guardrail:b004_a10_c2", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No eligible definition entails that a case is subject to high ambiguity or compressed interpretation time."}}, "condition_id": "b004_a10_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The case has high ambiguity or time pressure. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The case has high ambiguity or time pressure"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "It names interpreting ambiguity but does not entail high ambiguity or compressed time in the case itself.", "slug": "sensemaking"}], "normalized_requirement": "The case has high ambiguity or time pressure", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "No eligible definition entails that a case is subject to high ambiguity or compressed interpretation time. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The case has high ambiguity or time pressure", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "It covers shown information being mistaken for importance, but not a single resemblance dominating a structural comparison.", "slug": "salience_as_significance"}], "residual_id": "r:archetype_overmatching_guardrail:b004_a10_c3", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No eligible definition entails that one vivid resemblance disproportionately captures attention during structural comparison."}}, "condition_id": "b004_a10_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: One vivid similarity dominates attention. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["One vivid similarity dominates attention"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "It covers shown information being mistaken for importance, but not a single resemblance dominating a structural comparison.", "slug": "salience_as_significance"}], "normalized_requirement": "One vivid similarity dominates attention", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "No eligible definition entails that one vivid resemblance disproportionately captures attention during structural comparison. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "One vivid similarity dominates attention", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "It creates reusable categories for downstream reasoning but does not require that a pattern assignment changes action.", "slug": "classification"}], "residual_id": "r:archetype_overmatching_guardrail:b004_a10_c5", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No eligible definition entails that assigning a pattern to a case changes the response taken."}}, "condition_id": "b004_a10_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Pattern assignment will change action. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Pattern assignment will change action"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "It creates reusable categories for downstream reasoning but does not require that a pattern assignment changes action.", "slug": "classification"}], "normalized_requirement": "Pattern assignment will change action", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "No eligible definition entails that assigning a pattern to a case changes the response taken. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Pattern assignment will change action", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of a listed condition drops a relation or state retained by the frozen route reconciliation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The reconciled source-condition route states a sufficient remedy-free diagnostic pattern for this archetype."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The frozen reconciliation found that every valid pattern recognition instance entails this complete atom under the stated role binding.", "role_mapping": "Mandatory pattern recognition roles -> the corresponding actors, signals, states, or artifacts in the atom.", "slug": "pattern_recognition", "tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b004_a10_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A current case is interpreted through a familiar archetype before its structural fit has been demonstrated. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A familiar archetype appears to explain a new case.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A familiar archetype appears to explain a new case", "A current case is interpreted through a familiar archetype before its structural fit has been demonstrated."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER", "name": "Pattern Recognition", "one_liner": "Identify regularities.", "page_ref": "prime:pattern_recognition", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Mandatory pattern recognition roles -> the corresponding actors, signals, states, or artifacts in the atom.", "slug": "pattern_recognition", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The frozen reconciliation found that every valid pattern recognition instance entails this complete atom under the stated role binding."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A familiar archetype appears to explain a new case", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "It covers shown information being mistaken for importance, but not a single resemblance dominating a structural comparison.", "slug": "salience_as_significance"}], "residual_id": "r:archetype_overmatching_guardrail:b004_a10_c3", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No eligible definition entails that one vivid resemblance disproportionately captures attention during structural comparison."}}, "condition_id": "b004_a10_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: One vivid similarity dominates attention. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["One vivid similarity dominates attention"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "It covers shown information being mistaken for importance, but not a single resemblance dominating a structural comparison.", "slug": "salience_as_significance"}], "normalized_requirement": "One vivid similarity dominates attention", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "No eligible definition entails that one vivid resemblance disproportionately captures attention during structural comparison. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "One vivid similarity dominates attention", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "It explains standing out from a surround but not status, blame value, or organizational currency attached to a pattern.", "slug": "salience"}], "residual_id": "r:archetype_overmatching_guardrail:b004_a10_c4", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No eligible definition entails that a proposed pattern's status, blame usefulness, or institutional familiarity biases its application."}}, "condition_id": "b004_a10_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The archetype must preserve the speed and reuse value of pattern thinking while adding enough friction to prevent superficial matching. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The archetype has prestige, blame value, or organizational currency.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The archetype has prestige, blame value, or organizational currency", "The archetype must preserve the speed and reuse value of pattern thinking while adding enough friction to prevent superficial matching."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "It explains standing out from a surround but not status, blame value, or organizational currency attached to a pattern.", "slug": "salience"}], "normalized_requirement": "The archetype has prestige, blame value, or organizational currency", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "No eligible definition entails that a proposed pattern's status, blame usefulness, or institutional familiarity biases its application. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The archetype has prestige, blame value, or organizational currency", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "It creates reusable categories for downstream reasoning but does not require that a pattern assignment changes action.", "slug": "classification"}], "residual_id": "r:archetype_overmatching_guardrail:b004_a10_c5", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No eligible definition entails that assigning a pattern to a case changes the response taken."}}, "condition_id": "b004_a10_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Pattern assignment will change action. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Pattern assignment will change action"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "It creates reusable categories for downstream reasoning but does not require that a pattern assignment changes action.", "slug": "classification"}], "normalized_requirement": "Pattern assignment will change action", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "No eligible definition entails that assigning a pattern to a case changes the response taken. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Pattern assignment will change action", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of a listed condition drops a relation or state retained by the frozen route reconciliation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The reconciled source-condition route states a sufficient remedy-free diagnostic pattern for this archetype."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The frozen reconciliation found that every valid pattern recognition instance entails this complete atom under the stated role binding.", "role_mapping": "Mandatory pattern recognition roles -> the corresponding actors, signals, states, or artifacts in the atom.", "slug": "pattern_recognition", "tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b004_a10_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A current case is interpreted through a familiar archetype before its structural fit has been demonstrated. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A familiar archetype appears to explain a new case.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A familiar archetype appears to explain a new case", "A current case is interpreted through a familiar archetype before its structural fit has been demonstrated."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER", "name": "Pattern Recognition", "one_liner": "Identify regularities.", "page_ref": "prime:pattern_recognition", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Mandatory pattern recognition roles -> the corresponding actors, signals, states, or artifacts in the atom.", "slug": "pattern_recognition", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The frozen reconciliation found that every valid pattern recognition instance entails this complete atom under the stated role binding."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A familiar archetype appears to explain a new case", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "It creates reusable categories for downstream reasoning but does not require that a pattern assignment changes action.", "slug": "classification"}], "residual_id": "r:archetype_overmatching_guardrail:b004_a10_c5", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No eligible definition entails that assigning a pattern to a case changes the response taken."}}, "condition_id": "b004_a10_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Pattern assignment will change action. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Pattern assignment will change action"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "It creates reusable categories for downstream reasoning but does not require that a pattern assignment changes action.", "slug": "classification"}], "normalized_requirement": "Pattern assignment will change action", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "No eligible definition entails that assigning a pattern to a case changes the response taken. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Pattern assignment will change action", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "It positively publishes bounded applicability conditions, whereas the condition requires weak boundary discipline around an existing library.", "slug": "applicability_scope"}], "residual_id": "r:archetype_overmatching_guardrail:b004_a10_c6", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No eligible definition entails the conjunction of an available pattern collection and weak discipline at its applicability boundaries."}}, "condition_id": "b004_a10_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The archetype must preserve the speed and reuse value of pattern thinking while adding enough friction to prevent superficial matching. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A pattern library or archetype index is available but boundary discipline is weak.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A pattern library or archetype index is available but boundary discipline is weak", "The archetype must preserve the speed and reuse value of pattern thinking while adding enough friction to prevent superficial matching."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "It positively publishes bounded applicability conditions, whereas the condition requires weak boundary discipline around an existing library.", "slug": "applicability_scope"}], "normalized_requirement": "A pattern library or archetype index is available but boundary discipline is weak", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "No eligible definition entails the conjunction of an available pattern collection and weak discipline at its applicability boundaries. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A pattern library or archetype index is available but boundary discipline is weak", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 4, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-backfill-batch-004", "ledger_sha256": "091757fe37265dd949bd23521d484a9fe559bc7b9af6d5cc2f2693c0074310b4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Archetype Pattern Indexing", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:archetype_pattern_indexing", "slug": "archetype_pattern_indexing"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 3, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 5 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 3 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "People repeatedly encounter structurally similar situations but treat them as isolated, or they remember pattern names without a reliable way to recognize, retrieve, compare, and reuse the relevant archetype. Knowledge remains scattered across cases, experts, documents, or anecdotes, so pattern recognition depends on memory and intuition rather than inspectable structure.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "People repeatedly encounter structurally similar situations but treat them as isolated, or they remember pattern names without a reliable way to recognize, retrieve, compare, and reuse the relevant archetype. Knowledge remains scattered across cases, experts, documents, or anecdotes, so pattern recognition depends on memory and intuition rather than inspectable structure."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of a listed condition drops a relation or state retained by the frozen route reconciliation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The reconciled source-condition route states a sufficient remedy-free diagnostic pattern for this archetype."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Its structural signature requires a recurring pattern instantiated across distinct cultural and historical contexts. The relation is structurally true but retrieval-tautological, so it is exposed only as a scope-contested edge.", "role_mapping": "Cases with a similar underlying pattern recur in different settings.", "slug": "archetype", "tier": "SCOPE_CONTESTED_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b004_a11_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A pattern must be abstract enough to transfer across contexts but concrete enough to be recognized, tested, retrieved, and connected to action. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Similar cases recur across contexts.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Similar cases recur across contexts", "A pattern must be abstract enough to transfer across contexts but concrete enough to be recognized, tested, retrieved, and connected to action."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "SCOPE_CONTESTED_TRIGGER", "name": "Archetype", "one_liner": "Recurring pattern.", "page_ref": "prime:archetype", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Cases with a similar underlying pattern recur in different settings.", "slug": "archetype", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Its structural signature requires a recurring pattern instantiated across distinct cultural and historical contexts. The relation is structurally true but retrieval-tautological, so it is exposed only as a scope-contested edge."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Similar cases recur across contexts", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "It describes locating information successfully, not the weak mapping from a case to an already available pattern label.", "slug": "search_and_retrieval"}], "residual_id": "r:archetype_pattern_indexing:b004_a11_c2", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No eligible definition entails that pattern labels exist but cases fail to retrieve the relevant labels reliably."}}, "condition_id": "b004_a11_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "People repeatedly encounter structurally similar situations but treat them as isolated, or they remember pattern names without a reliable way to recognize, retrieve, compare, and reuse the relevant archetype. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Pattern names exist but retrieval is weak.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Pattern names exist but retrieval is weak", "People repeatedly encounter structurally similar situations but treat them as isolated, or they remember pattern names without a reliable way to recognize, retrieve, compare, and reuse the relevant archetype."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "It describes locating information successfully, not the weak mapping from a case to an already available pattern label.", "slug": "search_and_retrieval"}], "normalized_requirement": "Pattern names exist but retrieval is weak", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "No eligible definition entails that pattern labels exist but cases fail to retrieve the relevant labels reliably. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Pattern names exist but retrieval is weak", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "It supports downstream action through categories but does not entail that response choice depends on structural pattern recognition.", "slug": "classification"}], "residual_id": "r:archetype_pattern_indexing:b004_a11_c5", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No eligible definition entails that selecting an appropriate response depends on first recognizing the recurring structure in a case."}}, "condition_id": "b004_a11_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A pattern must be abstract enough to transfer across contexts but concrete enough to be recognized, tested, retrieved, and connected to action. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Response guidance depends on recognizing the pattern.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Response guidance depends on recognizing the pattern", "A pattern must be abstract enough to transfer across contexts but concrete enough to be recognized, tested, retrieved, and connected to action."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "It supports downstream action through categories but does not entail that response choice depends on structural pattern recognition.", "slug": "classification"}], "normalized_requirement": "Response guidance depends on recognizing the pattern", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "No eligible definition entails that selecting an appropriate response depends on first recognizing the recurring structure in a case. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Response guidance depends on recognizing the pattern", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of a listed condition drops a relation or state retained by the frozen route reconciliation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The reconciled source-condition route states a sufficient remedy-free diagnostic pattern for this archetype."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Its structural signature requires a recurring pattern instantiated across distinct cultural and historical contexts. The relation is structurally true but retrieval-tautological, so it is exposed only as a scope-contested edge.", "role_mapping": "Cases with a similar underlying pattern recur in different settings.", "slug": "archetype", "tier": "SCOPE_CONTESTED_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b004_a11_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A pattern must be abstract enough to transfer across contexts but concrete enough to be recognized, tested, retrieved, and connected to action. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Similar cases recur across contexts.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Similar cases recur across contexts", "A pattern must be abstract enough to transfer across contexts but concrete enough to be recognized, tested, retrieved, and connected to action."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "SCOPE_CONTESTED_TRIGGER", "name": "Archetype", "one_liner": "Recurring pattern.", "page_ref": "prime:archetype", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Cases with a similar underlying pattern recur in different settings.", "slug": "archetype", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Its structural signature requires a recurring pattern instantiated across distinct cultural and historical contexts. The relation is structurally true but retrieval-tautological, so it is exposed only as a scope-contested edge."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Similar cases recur across contexts", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "It maps likeness under a declared rule but does not entail erroneous conflation of structurally distinct cases.", "slug": "similarity_measure"}], "residual_id": "r:archetype_pattern_indexing:b004_a11_c3", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No eligible definition entails that surface similarity causes structurally distinct cases to be conflated."}}, "condition_id": "b004_a11_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Surface resemblance creates confusion. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Surface resemblance creates confusion"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "It maps likeness under a declared rule but does not entail erroneous conflation of structurally distinct cases.", "slug": "similarity_measure"}], "normalized_requirement": "Surface resemblance creates confusion", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "No eligible definition entails that surface similarity causes structurally distinct cases to be conflated. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Surface resemblance creates confusion", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "It supports downstream action through categories but does not entail that response choice depends on structural pattern recognition.", "slug": "classification"}], "residual_id": "r:archetype_pattern_indexing:b004_a11_c5", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No eligible definition entails that selecting an appropriate response depends on first recognizing the recurring structure in a case."}}, "condition_id": "b004_a11_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A pattern must be abstract enough to transfer across contexts but concrete enough to be recognized, tested, retrieved, and connected to action. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Response guidance depends on recognizing the pattern.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Response guidance depends on recognizing the pattern", "A pattern must be abstract enough to transfer across contexts but concrete enough to be recognized, tested, retrieved, and connected to action."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "It supports downstream action through categories but does not entail that response choice depends on structural pattern recognition.", "slug": "classification"}], "normalized_requirement": "Response guidance depends on recognizing the pattern", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "No eligible definition entails that selecting an appropriate response depends on first recognizing the recurring structure in a case. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Response guidance depends on recognizing the pattern", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of a listed condition drops a relation or state retained by the frozen route reconciliation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The reconciled source-condition route states a sufficient remedy-free diagnostic pattern for this archetype."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Its structural signature requires a recurring pattern instantiated across distinct cultural and historical contexts. The relation is structurally true but retrieval-tautological, so it is exposed only as a scope-contested edge.", "role_mapping": "Cases with a similar underlying pattern recur in different settings.", "slug": "archetype", "tier": "SCOPE_CONTESTED_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b004_a11_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A pattern must be abstract enough to transfer across contexts but concrete enough to be recognized, tested, retrieved, and connected to action. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Similar cases recur across contexts.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Similar cases recur across contexts", "A pattern must be abstract enough to transfer across contexts but concrete enough to be recognized, tested, retrieved, and connected to action."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "SCOPE_CONTESTED_TRIGGER", "name": "Archetype", "one_liner": "Recurring pattern.", "page_ref": "prime:archetype", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Cases with a similar underlying pattern recur in different settings.", "slug": "archetype", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Its structural signature requires a recurring pattern instantiated across distinct cultural and historical contexts. The relation is structurally true but retrieval-tautological, so it is exposed only as a scope-contested edge."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Similar cases recur across contexts", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "It is a positive sorting operation and does not entail that the existing example set lacks retrieval organization.", "slug": "classification"}], "residual_id": "r:archetype_pattern_indexing:b004_a11_c4", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No eligible definition entails that available examples lack an organization supporting comparison and retrieval."}}, "condition_id": "b004_a11_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Examples are available but not organized. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Examples are available but not organized"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "It is a positive sorting operation and does not entail that the existing example set lacks retrieval organization.", "slug": "classification"}], "normalized_requirement": "Examples are available but not organized", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "No eligible definition entails that available examples lack an organization supporting comparison and retrieval. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Examples are available but not organized", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "It supports downstream action through categories but does not entail that response choice depends on structural pattern recognition.", "slug": "classification"}], "residual_id": "r:archetype_pattern_indexing:b004_a11_c5", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No eligible definition entails that selecting an appropriate response depends on first recognizing the recurring structure in a case."}}, "condition_id": "b004_a11_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A pattern must be abstract enough to transfer across contexts but concrete enough to be recognized, tested, retrieved, and connected to action. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Response guidance depends on recognizing the pattern.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Response guidance depends on recognizing the pattern", "A pattern must be abstract enough to transfer across contexts but concrete enough to be recognized, tested, retrieved, and connected to action."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "It supports downstream action through categories but does not entail that response choice depends on structural pattern recognition.", "slug": "classification"}], "normalized_requirement": "Response guidance depends on recognizing the pattern", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "No eligible definition entails that selecting an appropriate response depends on first recognizing the recurring structure in a case. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Response guidance depends on recognizing the pattern", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 4, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-backfill-batch-004", "ledger_sha256": "091757fe37265dd949bd23521d484a9fe559bc7b9af6d5cc2f2693c0074310b4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Artificial Diversity Introduction During Homogenization Pressure", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:artificial_diversity_introduction_during_homogenization_pressure", "slug": "artificial_diversity_introduction_during_homogenization_pressure"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 4, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 4 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system is converging toward a narrow set of options, voices, standards, practices, suppliers, designs, narratives, or pathways. The convergence may reduce coordination costs, but it also removes alternative capacities, perspectives, experiments, and local adaptations. Once the dominant form becomes self-reinforcing, the system becomes more brittle, less representative, and less able to respond to shocks or novel opportunities.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system is converging toward a narrow set of options, voices, standards, practices, suppliers, designs, narratives, or pathways. The convergence may reduce coordination costs, but it also removes alternative capacities, perspectives, experiments, and local adaptations. Once the dominant form becomes self-reinforcing, the system becomes more brittle, less representative, and less able to respond to shocks or novel opportunities."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of a listed condition drops a relation or state retained by the frozen route reconciliation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The reconciled source-condition route states a sufficient remedy-free diagnostic pattern for this archetype."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The frozen reconciliation found that every valid standardization instance entails this complete atom under the stated role binding.", "role_mapping": "Mandatory standardization roles -> the corresponding actors, signals, states, or artifacts in the atom.", "slug": "standardization", "tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b004_a12_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Standardization, optimization, consolidation, platform dominance, funding incentives, or social conformity is eliminating variants. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Standardization, optimization, consolidation, platform dominance, funding incentives, or social conformity is eliminating variants."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER", "name": "Standardization", "one_liner": "The act or process by which independent parties converge on a single shared specification, format, or interface — agreement on a common norm rather than the benefits that follow from it.", "page_ref": "prime:standardization", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Mandatory standardization roles -> the corresponding actors, signals, states, or artifacts in the atom.", "slug": "standardization", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The frozen reconciliation found that every valid standardization instance entails this complete atom under the stated role binding."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Standardization, optimization, consolidation, platform dominance, funding incentives, or social conformity is eliminating variants.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Incomplete knowledge directly entails the unresolved-future alternative in the disjunction.", "role_mapping": "The system operates under uncertainty.", "slug": "uncertainty", "tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b004_a12_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The system faces uncertainty, changing environments, or unknown future demands. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The system faces uncertainty, changing environments, or unknown future demands."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER", "name": "Uncertainty", "one_liner": "Incomplete knowledge.", "page_ref": "prime:uncertainty", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "The system operates under uncertainty.", "slug": "uncertainty", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Incomplete knowledge directly entails the unresolved-future alternative in the disjunction."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The system faces uncertainty, changing environments, or unknown future demands.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "It limits universal method superiority but does not entail present dominance or any of the listed realized harms.", "slug": "no_free_lunch_theorem"}], "residual_id": "r:artificial_diversity_introduction_during_homogenization_pressure:b004_a12_c3", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No eligible definition entails that dependence on one dominant approach is producing exclusion, omitted perspectives, correlated failure exposure, or diminished novelty."}}, "condition_id": "b004_a12_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A dominant practice is producing blind spots, exclusion, common-mode failure risk, or stale innovation. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A dominant practice is producing blind spots, exclusion, common-mode failure risk, or stale innovation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "It limits universal method superiority but does not entail present dominance or any of the listed realized harms.", "slug": "no_free_lunch_theorem"}], "normalized_requirement": "A dominant practice is producing blind spots, exclusion, common-mode failure risk, or stale innovation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "No eligible definition entails that dependence on one dominant approach is producing exclusion, omitted perspectives, correlated failure exposure, or diminished novelty. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A dominant practice is producing blind spots, exclusion, common-mode failure risk, or stale innovation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of a listed condition drops a relation or state retained by the frozen route reconciliation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The reconciled source-condition route states a sufficient remedy-free diagnostic pattern for this archetype."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The frozen reconciliation found that every valid standardization instance entails this complete atom under the stated role binding.", "role_mapping": "Mandatory standardization roles -> the corresponding actors, signals, states, or artifacts in the atom.", "slug": "standardization", "tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b004_a12_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Standardization, optimization, consolidation, platform dominance, funding incentives, or social conformity is eliminating variants. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Standardization, optimization, consolidation, platform dominance, funding incentives, or social conformity is eliminating variants."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER", "name": "Standardization", "one_liner": "The act or process by which independent parties converge on a single shared specification, format, or interface — agreement on a common norm rather than the benefits that follow from it.", "page_ref": "prime:standardization", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Mandatory standardization roles -> the corresponding actors, signals, states, or artifacts in the atom.", "slug": "standardization", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The frozen reconciliation found that every valid standardization instance entails this complete atom under the stated role binding."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Standardization, optimization, consolidation, platform dominance, funding incentives, or social conformity is eliminating variants.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Incomplete knowledge directly entails the unresolved-future alternative in the disjunction.", "role_mapping": "The system operates under uncertainty.", "slug": "uncertainty", "tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b004_a12_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The system faces uncertainty, changing environments, or unknown future demands. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The system faces uncertainty, changing environments, or unknown future demands."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER", "name": "Uncertainty", "one_liner": "Incomplete knowledge.", "page_ref": "prime:uncertainty", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "The system operates under uncertainty.", "slug": "uncertainty", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Incomplete knowledge directly entails the unresolved-future alternative in the disjunction."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The system faces uncertainty, changing environments, or unknown future demands.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Its structure includes conformity pressure, premature consensus, and dissent suppression, satisfying the self-censorship alternative.", "role_mapping": "Participants suppress divergent choices under conformity pressure.", "slug": "groupthink", "tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b004_a12_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Participants are self-censoring, copying winners, or converging on the same benchmarks. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Participants are self-censoring, copying winners, or converging on the same benchmarks."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER", "name": "Groupthink", "one_liner": "Conformity overrides realism.", "page_ref": "prime:groupthink", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Participants suppress divergent choices under conformity pressure.", "slug": "groupthink", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Its structure includes conformity pressure, premature consensus, and dissent suppression, satisfying the self-censorship alternative."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Participants are self-censoring, copying winners, or converging on the same benchmarks.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of a listed condition drops a relation or state retained by the frozen route reconciliation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The reconciled source-condition route states a sufficient remedy-free diagnostic pattern for this archetype."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The frozen reconciliation found that every valid standardization instance entails this complete atom under the stated role binding.", "role_mapping": "Mandatory standardization roles -> the corresponding actors, signals, states, or artifacts in the atom.", "slug": "standardization", "tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b004_a12_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Standardization, optimization, consolidation, platform dominance, funding incentives, or social conformity is eliminating variants. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Standardization, optimization, consolidation, platform dominance, funding incentives, or social conformity is eliminating variants."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER", "name": "Standardization", "one_liner": "The act or process by which independent parties converge on a single shared specification, format, or interface — agreement on a common norm rather than the benefits that follow from it.", "page_ref": "prime:standardization", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Mandatory standardization roles -> the corresponding actors, signals, states, or artifacts in the atom.", "slug": "standardization", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The frozen reconciliation found that every valid standardization instance entails this complete atom under the stated role binding."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Standardization, optimization, consolidation, platform dominance, funding incentives, or social conformity is eliminating variants.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "It balances consistency and diversity but does not entail central imposition across heterogeneous local conditions.", "slug": "unity_variety"}], "residual_id": "r:artificial_diversity_introduction_during_homogenization_pressure:b004_a12_c5", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No eligible definition entails that heterogeneous local conditions are governed by a single centrally imposed form."}}, "condition_id": "b004_a12_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Local contexts differ but a central template is being imposed uniformly. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Local contexts differ but a central template is being imposed uniformly."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "It balances consistency and diversity but does not entail central imposition across heterogeneous local conditions.", "slug": "unity_variety"}], "normalized_requirement": "Local contexts differ but a central template is being imposed uniformly.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "No eligible definition entails that heterogeneous local conditions are governed by a single centrally imposed form. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Local contexts differ but a central template is being imposed uniformly.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of a listed condition drops a relation or state retained by the frozen route reconciliation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The reconciled source-condition route states a sufficient remedy-free diagnostic pattern for this archetype."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The frozen reconciliation found that every valid standardization instance entails this complete atom under the stated role binding.", "role_mapping": "Mandatory standardization roles -> the corresponding actors, signals, states, or artifacts in the atom.", "slug": "standardization", "tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b004_a12_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Standardization, optimization, consolidation, platform dominance, funding incentives, or social conformity is eliminating variants. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Standardization, optimization, consolidation, platform dominance, funding incentives, or social conformity is eliminating variants."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER", "name": "Standardization", "one_liner": "The act or process by which independent parties converge on a single shared specification, format, or interface — agreement on a common norm rather than the benefits that follow from it.", "page_ref": "prime:standardization", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Mandatory standardization roles -> the corresponding actors, signals, states, or artifacts in the atom.", "slug": "standardization", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The frozen reconciliation found that every valid standardization instance entails this complete atom under the stated role binding."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Standardization, optimization, consolidation, platform dominance, funding incentives, or social conformity is eliminating variants.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Incomplete knowledge directly entails the unresolved-future alternative in the disjunction.", "role_mapping": "The system operates under uncertainty.", "slug": "uncertainty", "tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b004_a12_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The system faces uncertainty, changing environments, or unknown future demands. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The system faces uncertainty, changing environments, or unknown future demands."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER", "name": "Uncertainty", "one_liner": "Incomplete knowledge.", "page_ref": "prime:uncertainty", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "The system operates under uncertainty.", "slug": "uncertainty", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Incomplete knowledge directly entails the unresolved-future alternative in the disjunction."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The system faces uncertainty, changing environments, or unknown future demands.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "It prescribes retaining dominated signals, rather than entailing that possibly valuable variants are already disappearing.", "slug": "minority_signal_preservation"}], "residual_id": "r:artificial_diversity_introduction_during_homogenization_pressure:b004_a12_c6", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No eligible definition entails that non-dominant variants are disappearing despite retaining contingent value under future conditions."}}, "condition_id": "b004_a12_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Legacy variants, minority approaches, or independent infrastructures are disappearing but may be valuable under future conditions. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Legacy variants, minority approaches, or independent infrastructures are disappearing but may be valuable under future conditions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "It prescribes retaining dominated signals, rather than entailing that possibly valuable variants are already disappearing.", "slug": "minority_signal_preservation"}], "normalized_requirement": "Legacy variants, minority approaches, or independent infrastructures are disappearing but may be valuable under future conditions.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "No eligible definition entails that non-dominant variants are disappearing despite retaining contingent value under future conditions. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Legacy variants, minority approaches, or independent infrastructures are disappearing but may be valuable under future conditions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 4, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-backfill-batch-004", "ledger_sha256": "091757fe37265dd949bd23521d484a9fe559bc7b9af6d5cc2f2693c0074310b4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Aspect-Scoped Identity Projection", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:aspect_scoped_identity_projection", "slug": "aspect_scoped_identity_projection"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 2 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 2}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system needs to attach properties, responsibilities, statuses, identifiers, or histories to one role/aspect of an entity, but the available model either collapses everything into the whole entity or splits the aspect so completely that its connection to the underlying bearer is lost.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system needs to attach properties, responsibilities, statuses, identifiers, or histories to one role/aspect of an entity, but the available model either collapses everything into the whole entity or splits the aspect so completely that its connection to the underlying bearer is lost."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of a listed condition drops a relation or state retained by the frozen route reconciliation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The reconciled source-condition route states a sufficient remedy-free diagnostic pattern for this archetype."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Its definition requires one persisting base entity to carry multiple aspect-localized property bundles.", "role_mapping": "One underlying entity occupies multiple scoped manifestations with different attributes or duties.", "slug": "aspectual_individual", "tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b004_a13_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system needs to attach properties, responsibilities, statuses, identifiers, or histories to one role/aspect of an entity, but the available model either collapses everything into the whole entity or splits the aspect so completely that its connection to the underlying bearer is lost. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The same underlying entity participates in multiple roles, capacities, phases, accounts, records, or expressions that have different properties or obligations.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The same underlying entity participates in multiple roles, capacities, phases, accounts, records, or expressions that have different properties or obligations.", "A system needs to attach properties, responsibilities, statuses, identifiers, or histories to one role/aspect of an entity, but the available model either collapses everything into the whole entity or splits the aspect so completely that its connection to the underlying bearer is lost."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER", "name": "Aspectual Individual", "one_liner": "Treating a single underlying entity, under a fixed role or aspect, as a distinct derived bearer of properties with its own narrower existence conditions.", "page_ref": "prime:aspectual_individual", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "One underlying entity occupies multiple scoped manifestations with different attributes or duties.", "slug": "aspectual_individual", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Its definition requires one persisting base entity to carry multiple aspect-localized property bundles."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The same underlying entity participates in multiple roles, capacities, phases, accounts, records, or expressions that have different properties or obligations.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The derived aspect-bearer necessarily has narrower lifecycle and existence conditions than the underlying entity.", "role_mapping": "A scoped manifestation has lifecycle or validity boundaries distinct from its underlying entity.", "slug": "aspectual_individual", "tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b004_a13_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The aspect has its own start, end, succession, suspension, or validity conditions. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The aspect has its own start, end, succession, suspension, or validity conditions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER", "name": "Aspectual Individual", "one_liner": "Treating a single underlying entity, under a fixed role or aspect, as a distinct derived bearer of properties with its own narrower existence conditions.", "page_ref": "prime:aspectual_individual", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "A scoped manifestation has lifecycle or validity boundaries distinct from its underlying entity.", "slug": "aspectual_individual", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The derived aspect-bearer necessarily has narrower lifecycle and existence conditions than the underlying entity."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The aspect has its own start, end, succession, suspension, or validity conditions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Claims made about one aspect should not automatically apply to the whole entity or to other aspects.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system needs to attach properties, responsibilities, statuses, identifiers, or histories to one role/aspect of an entity, but the available model either collapses everything into the whole entity or splits the aspect so completely that its connection to the underlying bearer is lost. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: Claims made about one aspect should not automatically apply to the whole entity or to other aspects. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Claims made about one aspect should not automatically apply to the whole entity or to other aspects.", "A system needs to attach properties, responsibilities, statuses, identifiers, or histories to one role/aspect of an entity, but the available model either collapses everything into the whole entity or splits the aspect so completely that its connection to the underlying bearer is lost."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "Claims made about one aspect should not automatically apply to the whole entity or to other aspects."}, {"display_text": "Different systems need to refer to the aspect without losing the link to the underlying entity.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system needs to attach properties, responsibilities, statuses, identifiers, or histories to one role/aspect of an entity, but the available model either collapses everything into the whole entity or splits the aspect so completely that its connection to the underlying bearer is lost. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: Different systems need to refer to the aspect without losing the link to the underlying entity. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Different systems need to refer to the aspect without losing the link to the underlying entity.", "A system needs to attach properties, responsibilities, statuses, identifiers, or histories to one role/aspect of an entity, but the available model either collapses everything into the whole entity or splits the aspect so completely that its connection to the underlying bearer is lost."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Different systems need to refer to the aspect without losing the link to the underlying entity."}, {"display_text": "A role-specific record must survive changes in some underlying properties but not others.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system needs to attach properties, responsibilities, statuses, identifiers, or histories to one role/aspect of an entity, but the available model either collapses everything into the whole entity or splits the aspect so completely that its connection to the underlying bearer is lost. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: A role-specific record must survive changes in some underlying properties but not others. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A role-specific record must survive changes in some underlying properties but not others.", "A system needs to attach properties, responsibilities, statuses, identifiers, or histories to one role/aspect of an entity, but the available model either collapses everything into the whole entity or splits the aspect so completely that its connection to the underlying bearer is lost."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "A role-specific record must survive changes in some underlying properties but not others."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 4, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-backfill-batch-004", "ledger_sha256": "091757fe37265dd949bd23521d484a9fe559bc7b9af6d5cc2f2693c0074310b4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Assignment / Matching Optimization", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:assignment_matching_optimization", "slug": "assignment_matching_optimization"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 2 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 2}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Naive assignment decomposes a relational decision into isolated rankings. A team selects the most qualified available worker for each job, a school admits the highest-priority student, or a platform recommends the highest-scoring counterpart. Each local choice can look defensible while the complete result overloads scarce agents, leaves essential needs uncovered, forms unacceptable relationships, or distributes undesirable placements to the same groups. The error is structural: relationship edges share capacity and their value is counterpart-specific.\n\nA second problem is multi-sided agency. The allocator, participant, receiving institution, and affected public may hold different preferences, priorities, rights, and information. Treating an institutional score as neutral fit hides those conflicts. Preference collection can itself create inequity because knowledgeable actors rank strategically, incomplete lists are misread as indifference, and inaccessible elicitation suppresses refusal or accommodation needs.\n\nA third problem is temporal. A feasible assignment at decision time may fail at handoff, unravel through blocking alternatives, or become obsolete when needs and capacities change. If no unmatched state, appeal, or rematching path exists, people defect informally and the official system loses both data and legitimacy. If the system reoptimizes continuously, it can destroy continuity and trust. The archetype must therefore govern the full relationship lifecycle, not only the initial calculation.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Counterpart-specific fit, shared capacity, and reciprocal constraints make isolated one-sided rankings produce a globally unacceptable assignment."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "This branch preserves the complete remedy-free diagnostic route; goals, feasibility clauses, gates, deployment constraints, and supporting context remain outside the DNF."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Every two-sided matching instance has pairing-specific preferences or compatibility constraints, so assignment value or admissibility depends on the particular counterpart.", "role_mapping": "The two populations map to occupants and destinations; acceptable pairings map to assignment-specific admissibility.", "slug": "two_sided_matching", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "ext001_assignment_matching_optimization_a01", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored structural_problem, prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: The value or admissibility of an assignment depends on the particular pairing of occupant and destination.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The value or admissibility of an assignment depends on the particular pairing of occupant and destination."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Two-Sided Matching", "one_liner": "Forming stable pairings between two sides of a market under each side's preferences.", "page_ref": "prime:two_sided_matching", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "The two populations map to occupants and destinations; acceptable pairings map to assignment-specific admissibility.", "slug": "two_sided_matching", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Every two-sided matching instance has pairing-specific preferences or compatibility constraints, so assignment value or admissibility depends on the particular counterpart."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The value or admissibility of an assignment depends on the particular pairing of occupant and destination.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "EXT001-C006", "dnf": [["EXT001-U006-O1"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"obligation_id": "EXT001-U006-O1", "predicate": "Assignment edges share capacity, so locally attractive choices can overload receivers or leave essential needs uncovered."}], "predicate": "Assignment edges share capacity, so locally attractive choices can overload receivers or leave essential needs uncovered.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Assignment edges share capacity, so locally attractive choices can overload receivers or leave essential needs uncovered.", "unit_id": "EXT001-U006"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"catalog_exhaustion": "CONDITION_LEVEL", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact record describes an intervention, control, or achieved configuration rather than a pre-existing situation that necessarily entails the atom.", "slug": "load_balancing"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Assignment edges share capacity, so locally attractive choices can overload receivers or leave essential needs uncovered.", "slug": "braess_paradox"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Assignment edges share capacity, so locally attractive choices can overload receivers or leave essential needs uncovered.", "slug": "allocation"}], "residual_id": "EXT001:assignment_matching_optimization:C02", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding."}}, "condition_id": "ext001_assignment_matching_optimization_a02", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored structural_problem, prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: Assignment edges share capacity, so locally attractive choices can overload receivers or leave essential needs uncovered.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Assignment edges share capacity, so locally attractive choices can overload receivers or leave essential needs uncovered."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact record describes an intervention, control, or achieved configuration rather than a pre-existing situation that necessarily entails the atom.", "slug": "load_balancing"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Assignment edges share capacity, so locally attractive choices can overload receivers or leave essential needs uncovered.", "slug": "braess_paradox"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Assignment edges share capacity, so locally attractive choices can overload receivers or leave essential needs uncovered.", "slug": "allocation"}], "normalized_requirement": "Assignment edges share capacity, so locally attractive choices can overload receivers or leave essential needs uncovered.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Assignment edges share capacity, so locally attractive choices can overload receivers or leave essential needs uncovered.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Multiple sides have meaningful preferences, refusals, rights, or accommodation constraints.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored structural_problem, prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Multiple sides have meaningful preferences, refusals, rights, or accommodation constraints. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Multiple sides have meaningful preferences, refusals, rights, or accommodation constraints.", "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored structural_problem, prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Multiple sides have meaningful preferences, refusals, rights, or accommodation constraints."}, {"display_text": "The assignment lifecycle requires appeal, rematching, or controlled continuity.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored structural_problem, prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: The assignment lifecycle requires appeal, rematching, or controlled continuity. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The assignment lifecycle requires appeal, rematching, or controlled continuity.", "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored structural_problem, prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The assignment lifecycle requires appeal, rematching, or controlled continuity."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"candidate_ledger_sha256": "96f72d2139077fd57bf795048ebef33b3fd574b20963170080ec916b5b3b92fe", "extension_id": "new-archetypes-extension-001", "ledger_id": "prime-production-v1.2-extension-001", "ledger_sha256": "9644520614744632d1d36da44b1acd77ce432852c6083eb871203521c166efce"}, "base_projection_sha256": "841e0c7f3cb8e8054475ad29a8a14745a416b4fc115559a44878b94292e673ec", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "ca09ed9fe1598ce7072755b530de5553f5ee0a7cd64ae82d9e4a4e2149a37788", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Assimilation Ceiling Guarding", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:assimilation_ceiling_guarding", "slug": "assimilation_ceiling_guarding"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 2, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 5, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 2 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "An initially beneficial input crosses the system’s assimilation ceiling, becomes a degrading load, depletes a secondary resource, and can lock the system into a worse regime that does not automatically reverse when the input is removed.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "An initially beneficial input crosses the system’s assimilation ceiling, becomes a degrading load, depletes a secondary resource, and can lock the system into a worse regime that does not automatically reverse when the input is removed."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of a listed condition drops a relation or state retained by the frozen route reconciliation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The reconciled source-condition route states a sufficient remedy-free diagnostic pattern for this archetype."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Its defining enabler has positive effects at low input levels before inverting above a ceiling.", "role_mapping": "An incoming load is beneficial within a lower or intermediate range.", "slug": "overshoot_and_collapse", "tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b004_a14_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "An initially beneficial input crosses the system’s assimilation ceiling, becomes a degrading load, depletes a secondary resource, and can lock the system into a worse regime that does not automatically reverse when the input is removed. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: An input, exposure, subsidy, nutrient, demand stream, training load, information flow, credit flow, or stimulation level is beneficial at low or moderate levels.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["An input, exposure, subsidy, nutrient, demand stream, training load, information flow, credit flow, or stimulation level is beneficial at low or moderate levels.", "An initially beneficial input crosses the system’s assimilation ceiling, becomes a degrading load, depletes a secondary resource, and can lock the system into a worse regime that does not automatically reverse when the input is removed."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER", "name": "Overshoot and Collapse", "one_liner": "An enabling input that is beneficial at low levels crosses an assimilation ceiling and inverts into a self-amplifying degrading load, depleting a secondary resource and locking in a hysteretic worse regime that does not reverse when the input is removed.", "page_ref": "prime:overshoot_and_collapse", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "An incoming load is beneficial within a lower or intermediate range.", "slug": "overshoot_and_collapse", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Its defining enabler has positive effects at low input levels before inverting above a ceiling."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "An input, exposure, subsidy, nutrient, demand stream, training load, information flow, credit flow, or stimulation level is beneficial at low or moderate levels.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "It explicitly requires a finite assimilation ceiling set by bounded absorption, processing, buffering, or clearance.", "role_mapping": "The receiving system has finite capacity to assimilate or recover from the load.", "slug": "overshoot_and_collapse", "tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b004_a14_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The receiving system has bounded assimilation, clearance, repair, attention, governance, liquidity, oxygen, recovery, or coordination capacity. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The receiving system has bounded assimilation, clearance, repair, attention, governance, liquidity, oxygen, recovery, or coordination capacity."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER", "name": "Overshoot and Collapse", "one_liner": "An enabling input that is beneficial at low levels crosses an assimilation ceiling and inverts into a self-amplifying degrading load, depleting a secondary resource and locking in a hysteretic worse regime that does not reverse when the input is removed.", "page_ref": "prime:overshoot_and_collapse", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "The receiving system has finite capacity to assimilate or recover from the load.", "slug": "overshoot_and_collapse", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "It explicitly requires a finite assimilation ceiling set by bounded absorption, processing, buffering, or clearance."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The receiving system has bounded assimilation, clearance, repair, attention, governance, liquidity, oxygen, recovery, or coordination capacity.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The frozen reconciliation found that every valid goodharts law instance entails this complete atom under the stated role binding.", "role_mapping": "Mandatory goodharts law roles -> the corresponding actors, signals, states, or artifacts in the atom.", "slug": "goodharts_law", "tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b004_a14_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Performance metrics reward gross input, expansion, or short-term output more than net absorption and recovery capacity. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Performance metrics reward gross input, expansion, or short-term output more than net absorption and recovery capacity."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER", "name": "Goodhart's Law", "one_liner": "When a proxy is placed under binding optimization pressure, its correlation with the construct it was meant to indicate collapses.", "page_ref": "prime:goodharts_law", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Mandatory goodharts law roles -> the corresponding actors, signals, states, or artifacts in the atom.", "slug": "goodharts_law", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The frozen reconciliation found that every valid goodharts law instance entails this complete atom under the stated role binding."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Performance metrics reward gross input, expansion, or short-term output more than net absorption and recovery capacity.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "It requires excess input to deplete a hidden secondary stock that, rather than the input, becomes the proximate constraint.", "role_mapping": "Excess input depletes a secondary resource not tracked as the primary constraint.", "slug": "overshoot_and_collapse", "tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b004_a14_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "An initially beneficial input crosses the system’s assimilation ceiling, becomes a degrading load, depletes a secondary resource, and can lock the system into a worse regime that does not automatically reverse when the input is removed. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Excess input can consume a secondary resource that is not measured as the primary constraint.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Excess input can consume a secondary resource that is not measured as the primary constraint.", "An initially beneficial input crosses the system’s assimilation ceiling, becomes a degrading load, depletes a secondary resource, and can lock the system into a worse regime that does not automatically reverse when the input is removed."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER", "name": "Overshoot and Collapse", "one_liner": "An enabling input that is beneficial at low levels crosses an assimilation ceiling and inverts into a self-amplifying degrading load, depleting a secondary resource and locking in a hysteretic worse regime that does not reverse when the input is removed.", "page_ref": "prime:overshoot_and_collapse", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Excess input depletes a secondary resource not tracked as the primary constraint.", "slug": "overshoot_and_collapse", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "It requires excess input to deplete a hidden secondary stock that, rather than the input, becomes the proximate constraint."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Excess input can consume a secondary resource that is not measured as the primary constraint.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Its hysteretic lock-in requires a recovery path that does not retrace onset and needs a larger or different reversal.", "role_mapping": "After degradation, recovery follows a different path and requires lower input or a distinct restoration.", "slug": "overshoot_and_collapse", "tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b004_a14_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The damaged state has hysteresis: the exit path requires lower input, active cleanup, or different interventions than the entry path. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The damaged state has hysteresis: the exit path requires lower input, active cleanup, or different interventions than the entry path."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER", "name": "Overshoot and Collapse", "one_liner": "An enabling input that is beneficial at low levels crosses an assimilation ceiling and inverts into a self-amplifying degrading load, depleting a secondary resource and locking in a hysteretic worse regime that does not reverse when the input is removed.", "page_ref": "prime:overshoot_and_collapse", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "After degradation, recovery follows a different path and requires lower input or a distinct restoration.", "slug": "overshoot_and_collapse", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Its hysteretic lock-in requires a recovery path that does not retrace onset and needs a larger or different reversal."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The damaged state has hysteresis: the exit path requires lower input, active cleanup, or different interventions than the entry path.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of a listed condition drops a relation or state retained by the frozen route reconciliation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The reconciled source-condition route states a sufficient remedy-free diagnostic pattern for this archetype."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Its defining enabler has positive effects at low input levels before inverting above a ceiling.", "role_mapping": "An incoming load is beneficial within a lower or intermediate range.", "slug": "overshoot_and_collapse", "tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b004_a14_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "An initially beneficial input crosses the system’s assimilation ceiling, becomes a degrading load, depletes a secondary resource, and can lock the system into a worse regime that does not automatically reverse when the input is removed. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: An input, exposure, subsidy, nutrient, demand stream, training load, information flow, credit flow, or stimulation level is beneficial at low or moderate levels.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["An input, exposure, subsidy, nutrient, demand stream, training load, information flow, credit flow, or stimulation level is beneficial at low or moderate levels.", "An initially beneficial input crosses the system’s assimilation ceiling, becomes a degrading load, depletes a secondary resource, and can lock the system into a worse regime that does not automatically reverse when the input is removed."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER", "name": "Overshoot and Collapse", "one_liner": "An enabling input that is beneficial at low levels crosses an assimilation ceiling and inverts into a self-amplifying degrading load, depleting a secondary resource and locking in a hysteretic worse regime that does not reverse when the input is removed.", "page_ref": "prime:overshoot_and_collapse", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "An incoming load is beneficial within a lower or intermediate range.", "slug": "overshoot_and_collapse", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Its defining enabler has positive effects at low input levels before inverting above a ceiling."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "An input, exposure, subsidy, nutrient, demand stream, training load, information flow, credit flow, or stimulation level is beneficial at low or moderate levels.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "It explicitly requires a finite assimilation ceiling set by bounded absorption, processing, buffering, or clearance.", "role_mapping": "The receiving system has finite capacity to assimilate or recover from the load.", "slug": "overshoot_and_collapse", "tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b004_a14_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The receiving system has bounded assimilation, clearance, repair, attention, governance, liquidity, oxygen, recovery, or coordination capacity. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The receiving system has bounded assimilation, clearance, repair, attention, governance, liquidity, oxygen, recovery, or coordination capacity."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER", "name": "Overshoot and Collapse", "one_liner": "An enabling input that is beneficial at low levels crosses an assimilation ceiling and inverts into a self-amplifying degrading load, depleting a secondary resource and locking in a hysteretic worse regime that does not reverse when the input is removed.", "page_ref": "prime:overshoot_and_collapse", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "The receiving system has finite capacity to assimilate or recover from the load.", "slug": "overshoot_and_collapse", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "It explicitly requires a finite assimilation ceiling set by bounded absorption, processing, buffering, or clearance."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The receiving system has bounded assimilation, clearance, repair, attention, governance, liquidity, oxygen, recovery, or coordination capacity.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "It requires excess input to deplete a hidden secondary stock that, rather than the input, becomes the proximate constraint.", "role_mapping": "Excess input depletes a secondary resource not tracked as the primary constraint.", "slug": "overshoot_and_collapse", "tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b004_a14_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "An initially beneficial input crosses the system’s assimilation ceiling, becomes a degrading load, depletes a secondary resource, and can lock the system into a worse regime that does not automatically reverse when the input is removed. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Excess input can consume a secondary resource that is not measured as the primary constraint.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Excess input can consume a secondary resource that is not measured as the primary constraint.", "An initially beneficial input crosses the system’s assimilation ceiling, becomes a degrading load, depletes a secondary resource, and can lock the system into a worse regime that does not automatically reverse when the input is removed."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER", "name": "Overshoot and Collapse", "one_liner": "An enabling input that is beneficial at low levels crosses an assimilation ceiling and inverts into a self-amplifying degrading load, depleting a secondary resource and locking in a hysteretic worse regime that does not reverse when the input is removed.", "page_ref": "prime:overshoot_and_collapse", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Excess input depletes a secondary resource not tracked as the primary constraint.", "slug": "overshoot_and_collapse", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "It requires excess input to deplete a hidden secondary stock that, rather than the input, becomes the proximate constraint."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Excess input can consume a secondary resource that is not measured as the primary constraint.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "It entails often-invisible accumulated damage but not an incoming load crossing a named receiver-capacity threshold before visibility.", "slug": "gradual_deterioration"}], "residual_id": "r:assimilation_ceiling_guarding:b004_a14_c5", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No eligible definition entails that damage signals lag far enough for incoming load to cross the receiver's capacity threshold before damage becomes visible."}}, "condition_id": "b004_a14_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The same input that creates value inside an assimilation range becomes destructive beyond that range, and incentives often measure the input or early benefit before they measure receiver overload and delayed regime damage. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Feedback is delayed enough that the ceiling is crossed before damage is visible.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Feedback is delayed enough that the ceiling is crossed before damage is visible.", "The same input that creates value inside an assimilation range becomes destructive beyond that range, and incentives often measure the input or early benefit before they measure receiver overload and delayed regime damage."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "It entails often-invisible accumulated damage but not an incoming load crossing a named receiver-capacity threshold before visibility.", "slug": "gradual_deterioration"}], "normalized_requirement": "Feedback is delayed enough that the ceiling is crossed before damage is visible.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "No eligible definition entails that damage signals lag far enough for incoming load to cross the receiver's capacity threshold before damage becomes visible. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Feedback is delayed enough that the ceiling is crossed before damage is visible.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Its hysteretic lock-in requires a recovery path that does not retrace onset and needs a larger or different reversal.", "role_mapping": "After degradation, recovery follows a different path and requires lower input or a distinct restoration.", "slug": "overshoot_and_collapse", "tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b004_a14_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The damaged state has hysteresis: the exit path requires lower input, active cleanup, or different interventions than the entry path. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The damaged state has hysteresis: the exit path requires lower input, active cleanup, or different interventions than the entry path."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER", "name": "Overshoot and Collapse", "one_liner": "An enabling input that is beneficial at low levels crosses an assimilation ceiling and inverts into a self-amplifying degrading load, depleting a secondary resource and locking in a hysteretic worse regime that does not reverse when the input is removed.", "page_ref": "prime:overshoot_and_collapse", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "After degradation, recovery follows a different path and requires lower input or a distinct restoration.", "slug": "overshoot_and_collapse", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Its hysteretic lock-in requires a recovery path that does not retrace onset and needs a larger or different reversal."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The damaged state has hysteresis: the exit path requires lower input, active cleanup, or different interventions than the entry path.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 4, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-backfill-batch-004", "ledger_sha256": "091757fe37265dd949bd23521d484a9fe559bc7b9af6d5cc2f2693c0074310b4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Associative Cue Redesign", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:associative_cue_redesign", "slug": "associative_cue_redesign"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 2, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 2, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 2 of 2 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a persistent cue-response association. A cue may be physical, temporal, social, procedural, digital, symbolic, or sensory. The response may be an action, omission, shortcut, interpretation, click, routine, or avoidance pattern. The behavior persists because the cue field keeps making the old response easy to start.\n\nThe common mistake is to address the actor’s intention while leaving the trigger untouched. Training, policies, posters, incentives, and after-the-fact feedback may all fail if the old cue still appears at the decision moment. The result is a mismatch between declared goals and situated behavior.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A behavior, shortcut, omission, interpretation, or routine persists because the environment repeatedly cues it, even when intention, instruction, training, incentives, or explicit goals have changed."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of a listed condition drops a relation or state retained by the frozen route reconciliation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The reconciled source-condition route states a sufficient remedy-free diagnostic pattern for this archetype."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "It is defined as a cue-triggered, automatically executed action sequence that persists with little deliberation.", "role_mapping": "A recurring context rapidly elicits an established response with little deliberate control.", "slug": "habit", "tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b004_a15_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when a repeated behavior appears automatically in a recurring context. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The old response is fast, habitual, procedural, or automatic in a recurring context.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The old response is fast, habitual, procedural, or automatic in a recurring context.", "Use this archetype when a repeated behavior appears automatically in a recurring context."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER", "name": "Habit", "one_liner": "A cue-triggered, automatically executed action sequence that persists under outcome devaluation.", "page_ref": "prime:habit", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "A recurring context rapidly elicits an established response with little deliberate control.", "slug": "habit", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "It is defined as a cue-triggered, automatically executed action sequence that persists with little deliberation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The old response is fast, habitual, procedural, or automatic in a recurring context.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "It supplies the established cue-triggered response that occurs when the old trigger is encountered.", "role_mapping": "The failure occurs when the established trigger appears.", "slug": "habit", "tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "It entails accurate, explicit knowledge of the intended action together with systematic failure to enact it.", "role_mapping": "Actors can state the intended response yet fail to enact it.", "slug": "knowledge_action_gap", "tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b004_a15_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when a repeated behavior appears automatically in a recurring context. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: People can name the desired behavior but fail to enact it when the old cue appears.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["People can name the desired behavior but fail to enact it when the old cue appears.", "Use this archetype when a repeated behavior appears automatically in a recurring context."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER", "name": "Habit", "one_liner": "A cue-triggered, automatically executed action sequence that persists under outcome devaluation.", "page_ref": "prime:habit", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "The failure occurs when the established trigger appears.", "slug": "habit", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "It supplies the established cue-triggered response that occurs when the old trigger is encountered."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER", "name": "Knowledge-Action Gap", "one_liner": "An agent holds accurate knowledge of the appropriate action, sincerely intends to take it, and systematically does not — because knowing and doing are separable load-bearing states and intervention on the knowing channel does not, by itself, change the doing channel.", "page_ref": "prime:knowledge_action_gap", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Actors can state the intended response yet fail to enact it.", "slug": "knowledge_action_gap", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "It entails accurate, explicit knowledge of the intended action together with systematic failure to enact it."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "People can name the desired behavior but fail to enact it when the old cue appears.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Its defining trigger is a recurring sensory, temporal, or postural condition immediately eliciting action.", "role_mapping": "A repeatable event reliably precedes and triggers the unwanted response.", "slug": "habit", "tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "It requires a persistent cue-response relation in which an established cue reliably elicits a now-harmful response.", "role_mapping": "A repeatable cue reliably precedes the undesired response.", "slug": "evolutionary_trap", "tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b004_a15_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A cue may be physical, temporal, social, procedural, digital, symbolic, or sensory. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A physical object, interface prompt, workflow sequence, social moment, time of day, location, or sensory signal reliably precedes the unwanted response.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A physical object, interface prompt, workflow sequence, social moment, time of day, location, or sensory signal reliably precedes the unwanted response.", "A cue may be physical, temporal, social, procedural, digital, symbolic, or sensory."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER", "name": "Habit", "one_liner": "A cue-triggered, automatically executed action sequence that persists under outcome devaluation.", "page_ref": "prime:habit", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "A repeatable event reliably precedes and triggers the unwanted response.", "slug": "habit", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Its defining trigger is a recurring sensory, temporal, or postural condition immediately eliciting action."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER", "name": "Evolutionary Trap", "one_liner": "An agent follows a once-reliable cue more eagerly the stronger it is, straight into harm, because the environment changed and the cue-value coupling broke while the cue-response did not.", "page_ref": "prime:evolutionary_trap", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "A repeatable cue reliably precedes the undesired response.", "slug": "evolutionary_trap", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "It requires a persistent cue-response relation in which an established cue reliably elicits a now-harmful response."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A physical object, interface prompt, workflow sequence, social moment, time of day, location, or sensory signal reliably precedes the unwanted response.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of a listed condition drops a relation or state retained by the frozen route reconciliation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The reconciled source-condition route states a sufficient remedy-free diagnostic pattern for this archetype."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "It is defined as a cue-triggered, automatically executed action sequence that persists with little deliberation.", "role_mapping": "A recurring context rapidly elicits an established response with little deliberate control.", "slug": "habit", "tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b004_a15_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when a repeated behavior appears automatically in a recurring context. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The old response is fast, habitual, procedural, or automatic in a recurring context.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The old response is fast, habitual, procedural, or automatic in a recurring context.", "Use this archetype when a repeated behavior appears automatically in a recurring context."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER", "name": "Habit", "one_liner": "A cue-triggered, automatically executed action sequence that persists under outcome devaluation.", "page_ref": "prime:habit", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "A recurring context rapidly elicits an established response with little deliberate control.", "slug": "habit", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "It is defined as a cue-triggered, automatically executed action sequence that persists with little deliberation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The old response is fast, habitual, procedural, or automatic in a recurring context.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Its outcome-devaluation invariance entails that downstream consequences do not change the cue-triggered action while the cue relation persists.", "role_mapping": "Downstream consequences fail to change behavior while the triggering context remains intact.", "slug": "habit", "tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b004_a15_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when a repeated behavior appears automatically in a recurring context. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Reminder campaigns, training, or downstream consequences have not changed behavior because the triggering context remains intact.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Reminder campaigns, training, or downstream consequences have not changed behavior because the triggering context remains intact.", "Use this archetype when a repeated behavior appears automatically in a recurring context."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER", "name": "Habit", "one_liner": "A cue-triggered, automatically executed action sequence that persists under outcome devaluation.", "page_ref": "prime:habit", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Downstream consequences fail to change behavior while the triggering context remains intact.", "slug": "habit", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Its outcome-devaluation invariance entails that downstream consequences do not change the cue-triggered action while the cue relation persists."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Reminder campaigns, training, or downstream consequences have not changed behavior because the triggering context remains intact.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Its defining trigger is a recurring sensory, temporal, or postural condition immediately eliciting action.", "role_mapping": "A repeatable event reliably precedes and triggers the unwanted response.", "slug": "habit", "tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "It requires a persistent cue-response relation in which an established cue reliably elicits a now-harmful response.", "role_mapping": "A repeatable cue reliably precedes the undesired response.", "slug": "evolutionary_trap", "tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b004_a15_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A cue may be physical, temporal, social, procedural, digital, symbolic, or sensory. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A physical object, interface prompt, workflow sequence, social moment, time of day, location, or sensory signal reliably precedes the unwanted response.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A physical object, interface prompt, workflow sequence, social moment, time of day, location, or sensory signal reliably precedes the unwanted response.", "A cue may be physical, temporal, social, procedural, digital, symbolic, or sensory."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER", "name": "Habit", "one_liner": "A cue-triggered, automatically executed action sequence that persists under outcome devaluation.", "page_ref": "prime:habit", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "A repeatable event reliably precedes and triggers the unwanted response.", "slug": "habit", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Its defining trigger is a recurring sensory, temporal, or postural condition immediately eliciting action."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "HUMAN_ADJUDICATED_TRIGGER", "name": "Evolutionary Trap", "one_liner": "An agent follows a once-reliable cue more eagerly the stronger it is, straight into harm, because the environment changed and the cue-value coupling broke while the cue-response did not.", "page_ref": "prime:evolutionary_trap", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "A repeatable cue reliably precedes the undesired response.", "slug": "evolutionary_trap", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "It requires a persistent cue-response relation in which an established cue reliably elicits a now-harmful response."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A physical object, interface prompt, workflow sequence, social moment, time of day, location, or sensory signal reliably precedes the unwanted response.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The desired replacement response must occur at a specific point of action, not merely as a general attitude or intention.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Associative Cue Redesign moves the intervention to the point where the old response is activated. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: The desired replacement response must occur at a specific point of action, not merely as a general attitude or intention. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The desired replacement response must occur at a specific point of action, not merely as a general attitude or intention.", "Associative Cue Redesign moves the intervention to the point where the old response is activated."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The desired replacement response must occur at a specific point of action, not merely as a general attitude or intention."}, {"display_text": "The behavior-change context is legitimate, transparent, and proportionate enough that cue redesign can be used without covert manipulation.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when a repeated behavior appears automatically in a recurring context. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: The behavior-change context is legitimate, transparent, and proportionate enough that cue redesign can be used without covert manipulation. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The behavior-change context is legitimate, transparent, and proportionate enough that cue redesign can be used without covert manipulation.", "Use this archetype when a repeated behavior appears automatically in a recurring context."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The behavior-change context is legitimate, transparent, and proportionate enough that cue redesign can be used without covert manipulation."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 4, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-backfill-batch-004", "ledger_sha256": "091757fe37265dd949bd23521d484a9fe559bc7b9af6d5cc2f2693c0074310b4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Associative Transfer Warrant Audit", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:associative_transfer_warrant_audit", "slug": "associative_transfer_warrant_audit"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 3 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A receiver assigns a property to a target because the target is linked to a source, category, event, symbol, platform, group, channel, person, or artifact, even though the link may not carry that property. The association may be real but the inference may be unwarranted.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A receiver assigns a property to a target because the target is linked to a source, category, event, symbol, platform, group, channel, person, or artifact, even though the link may not carry that property. The association may be real but the inference may be unwarranted."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any listed literal drops at least one stated head obligation or the relation connecting them.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed source atoms plus the explicit head residual jointly entail the diagnostic head without importing a remedy or goal."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a downstream estimate of a target property to move because of an associative link whose warrant is explicitly live.", "role_mapping": "Source property -> assigned property; associative edge -> proximity, contact, membership, endorsement, dependency, analogy, or label; target -> evaluated target.", "slug": "associative_property_transfer", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b005_a01_b005_a01_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The link may be salient without being warrant-bearing. In this condition set, the requirement is: A property is being assigned through proximity, contact, co-membership, endorsement, dependency, analogy, or shared label.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A property is being assigned through proximity, contact, co-membership, endorsement, dependency, analogy, or shared label."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Associative Property Transfer", "one_liner": "A property flows along an associative link rather than along a causal or evidential one.", "page_ref": "prime:associative_property_transfer", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source property -> assigned property; associative edge -> proximity, contact, membership, endorsement, dependency, analogy, or label; target -> evaluated target.", "slug": "associative_property_transfer", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a downstream estimate of a target property to move because of an associative link whose warrant is explicitly live."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A property is being assigned through proximity, contact, co-membership, endorsement, dependency, analogy, or shared label.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime is warrant-neutral: a valid instance may have a clearly known causal channel, so it does not require the pathway to be unclear, implicit, or disputed.", "slug": "associative_property_transfer"}], "residual_id": "r:associative_transfer_warrant_audit:b005_a01_b005_a01_c3", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b005_a01_b005_a01_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The audit is most useful when the link is doing unstated inferential work. In this condition set, the requirement is: The causal or evidential pathway is unclear, implicit, or disputed.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The causal or evidential pathway is unclear, implicit, or disputed."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime is warrant-neutral: a valid instance may have a clearly known causal channel, so it does not require the pathway to be unclear, implicit, or disputed.", "slug": "associative_property_transfer"}], "normalized_requirement": "The causal or evidential pathway is unclear, implicit, or disputed.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The causal or evidential pathway is unclear, implicit, or disputed.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The associative link does not itself warrant transfer of the property in the decision at issue.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The associative link does not itself warrant transfer of the property in the decision at issue.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The property matters for trust, blame, risk, credibility, status, access, safety, responsibility, or quality.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Low-stakes aesthetic associations may not need the full audit. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: The property matters for trust, blame, risk, credibility, status, access, safety, responsibility, or quality. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The property matters for trust, blame, risk, credibility, status, access, safety, responsibility, or quality.", "Low-stakes aesthetic associations may not need the full audit."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "The property matters for trust, blame, risk, credibility, status, access, safety, responsibility, or quality."}, {"display_text": "Downstream actors may reuse the transferred property as if it were a settled fact.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A weak association can harden into a label once decisions, records, or reputations depend on it. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Downstream actors may reuse the transferred property as if it were a settled fact. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Downstream actors may reuse the transferred property as if it were a settled fact.", "A weak association can harden into a label once decisions, records, or reputations depend on it."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Downstream actors may reuse the transferred property as if it were a settled fact."}, {"display_text": "The same link could either indicate a real channel or a misleading heuristic.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Contact can be real contagion, an endorsement signal, a dependency risk, or mere co-presence. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: The same link could either indicate a real channel or a misleading heuristic. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The same link could either indicate a real channel or a misleading heuristic.", "Contact can be real contagion, an endorsement signal, a dependency risk, or mere co-presence."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The same link could either indicate a real channel or a misleading heuristic."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 5, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-backfill-batch-005", "ledger_sha256": "823445e5543375cf29a4850086257af6c6c07564f0b0b28fdad3ca263a3e819c"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Assumption-Bounded Distributed Agreement", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:assumption_bounded_distributed_agreement", "slug": "assumption_bounded_distributed_agreement"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Several independently controlled participants must expose one authoritative decision or ordered state even though they do not share instantaneous knowledge and some participants or communication paths may fail, recover, delay, partition, or behave adversarially. Each participant can see only a local and potentially stale slice of the system, so an apparently sufficient set of responses may coexist with a conflicting set elsewhere unless membership, fault bounds, rounds, and decision evidence are designed to intersect safely.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Several independently controlled participants must expose one authoritative decision or ordered state even though they do not share instantaneous knowledge and some participants or communication paths may fail, recover, delay, partition, or behave adversarially. Each participant can see only a local and potentially stale slice of the system, so an apparently sufficient set of responses may coexist with a conflicting set elsewhere unless membership, fault bounds, rounds, and decision evidence are designed to intersect safely."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any listed literal drops at least one stated head obligation or the relation connecting them.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed source atoms plus the explicit head residual jointly entail the diagnostic head without importing a remedy or goal."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Consensus requires plural participants without a dictator to produce one shared decided state under agreement, validity, and termination criteria.", "role_mapping": "Consensus participants -> independently controlled participants; decided state -> value, leader, order, configuration, lock owner, or transition.", "slug": "consensus", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b005_a02_b005_a02_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Several independently controlled participants must expose one authoritative decision or ordered state even though they do not share instantaneous knowledge and some participants or communication paths may fail, recover, delay, partition, or behave adversarially. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Two or more independently failing participants must agree on one value, leader, order, configuration, lock owner, or state transition.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Two or more independently failing participants must agree on one value, leader, order, configuration, lock owner, or state transition.", "Several independently controlled participants must expose one authoritative decision or ordered state even though they do not share instantaneous knowledge and some participants or communication paths may fail, recover, delay, partition, or behave adversarially."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Consensus", "one_liner": "Producing a single shared decided state from many participants with disagreeing or adversarial views, under a fault model, satisfying agreement, validity, and termination together.", "page_ref": "prime:consensus", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Consensus participants -> independently controlled participants; decided state -> value, leader, order, configuration, lock owner, or transition.", "slug": "consensus", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Consensus requires plural participants without a dictator to produce one shared decided state under agreement, validity, and termination criteria."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Two or more independently failing participants must agree on one value, leader, order, configuration, lock owner, or state transition.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [], "residual_id": "r:assumption_bounded_distributed_agreement:b005_a02_b005_a02_c3", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b005_a02_b005_a02_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Several independently controlled participants must expose one authoritative decision or ordered state even though they do not share instantaneous knowledge and some participants or communication paths may fail, recover, delay, partition, or behave adversarially. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Messages can be delayed, lost, duplicated, reordered, or partitioned, so silence is ambiguous.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Messages can be delayed, lost, duplicated, reordered, or partitioned, so silence is ambiguous.", "Several independently controlled participants must expose one authoritative decision or ordered state even though they do not share instantaneous knowledge and some participants or communication paths may fail, recover, delay, partition, or behave adversarially."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "Messages can be delayed, lost, duplicated, reordered, or partitioned, so silence is ambiguous.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Messages can be delayed, lost, duplicated, reordered, or partitioned, so silence is ambiguous.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid consensus fault model may place the tolerated fault in a channel while assuming participants do not crash, restart, lose state, equivocate, or collude; the participant-specific disjunction is not universal.", "slug": "consensus"}], "residual_id": "r:assumption_bounded_distributed_agreement:b005_a02_b005_a02_c4", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b005_a02_b005_a02_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Several independently controlled participants must expose one authoritative decision or ordered state even though they do not share instantaneous knowledge and some participants or communication paths may fail, recover, delay, partition, or behave adversarially. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Participants may crash, restart, lose volatile state, or, in stronger threat models, equivocate or collude.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Participants may crash, restart, lose volatile state, or, in stronger threat models, equivocate or collude.", "Several independently controlled participants must expose one authoritative decision or ordered state even though they do not share instantaneous knowledge and some participants or communication paths may fail, recover, delay, partition, or behave adversarially."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid consensus fault model may place the tolerated fault in a channel while assuming participants do not crash, restart, lose state, equivocate, or collude; the participant-specific disjunction is not universal.", "slug": "consensus"}], "normalized_requirement": "Participants may crash, restart, lose volatile state, or, in stronger threat models, equivocate or collude.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Participants may crash, restart, lose volatile state, or, in stronger threat models, equivocate or collude.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime expressly requires plural participants without a dictator able to impose the outcome.", "role_mapping": "No-dictator role -> absence of one permanently trusted decider.", "slug": "consensus", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b005_a02_b005_a02_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Each participant can see only a local and potentially stale slice of the system, so an apparently sufficient set of responses may coexist with a conflicting set elsewhere unless membership, fault bounds, rounds, and decision evidence are designed to intersect safely. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: No single permanently trusted participant can safely decide every instance without becoming an unacceptable failure or capture point.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["No single permanently trusted participant can safely decide every instance without becoming an unacceptable failure or capture point.", "Each participant can see only a local and potentially stale slice of the system, so an apparently sufficient set of responses may coexist with a conflicting set elsewhere unless membership, fault bounds, rounds, and decision evidence are designed to intersect safely."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Consensus", "one_liner": "Producing a single shared decided state from many participants with disagreeing or adversarial views, under a fault model, satisfying agreement, validity, and termination together.", "page_ref": "prime:consensus", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "No-dictator role -> absence of one permanently trusted decider.", "slug": "consensus", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime expressly requires plural participants without a dictator able to impose the outcome."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "No single permanently trusted participant can safely decide every instance without becoming an unacceptable failure or capture point.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "Apparently sufficient local response sets can coexist unless decision evidence is designed to intersect under the stated membership and fault bound.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Apparently sufficient local response sets can coexist unless decision evidence is designed to intersect under the stated membership and fault bound.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A conflicting pair of decisions would be materially worse than temporary unavailability or delay.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Each participant can see only a local and potentially stale slice of the system, so an apparently sufficient set of responses may coexist with a conflicting set elsewhere unless membership, fault bounds, rounds, and decision evidence are designed to intersect safely. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: A conflicting pair of decisions would be materially worse than temporary unavailability or delay. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A conflicting pair of decisions would be materially worse than temporary unavailability or delay.", "Each participant can see only a local and potentially stale slice of the system, so an apparently sufficient set of responses may coexist with a conflicting set elsewhere unless membership, fault bounds, rounds, and decision evidence are designed to intersect safely."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "A conflicting pair of decisions would be materially worse than temporary unavailability or delay."}, {"display_text": "The system needs a checkable notion of finality that recovering or lagging participants can verify.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Several independently controlled participants must expose one authoritative decision or ordered state even though they do not share instantaneous knowledge and some participants or communication paths may fail, recover, delay, partition, or behave adversarially. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: The system needs a checkable notion of finality that recovering or lagging participants can verify. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The system needs a checkable notion of finality that recovering or lagging participants can verify.", "Several independently controlled participants must expose one authoritative decision or ordered state even though they do not share instantaneous knowledge and some participants or communication paths may fail, recover, delay, partition, or behave adversarially."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The system needs a checkable notion of finality that recovering or lagging participants can verify."}, {"display_text": "Membership or leadership can change over time and stale authorities must be prevented from continuing to decide.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Each participant can see only a local and potentially stale slice of the system, so an apparently sufficient set of responses may coexist with a conflicting set elsewhere unless membership, fault bounds, rounds, and decision evidence are designed to intersect safely. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Membership or leadership can change over time and stale authorities must be prevented from continuing to decide. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Membership or leadership can change over time and stale authorities must be prevented from continuing to decide.", "Each participant can see only a local and potentially stale slice of the system, so an apparently sufficient set of responses may coexist with a conflicting set elsewhere unless membership, fault bounds, rounds, and decision evidence are designed to intersect safely."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "Membership or leadership can change over time and stale authorities must be prevented from continuing to decide."}, {"display_text": "The application can define an admissible value domain and a validity predicate before agreement is attempted.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: The application can define an admissible value domain and a validity predicate before agreement is attempted. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The application can define an admissible value domain and a validity predicate before agreement is attempted."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 8, "text": "The application can define an admissible value domain and a validity predicate before agreement is attempted."}, {"display_text": "The system can state a finite fault budget or trust assumption rather than treating all failures as unbounded.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Under full asynchrony with faults, delay is indistinguishable from failure, so a deterministic protocol cannot guarantee both unbroken progress and safety without adding timing, randomness, failure-detector, trust, or availability assumptions. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: The system can state a finite fault budget or trust assumption rather than treating all failures as unbounded. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [9], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The system can state a finite fault budget or trust assumption rather than treating all failures as unbounded.", "Under full asynchrony with faults, delay is indistinguishable from failure, so a deterministic protocol cannot guarantee both unbroken progress and safety without adding timing, randomness, failure-detector, trust, or availability assumptions."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 9, "text": "The system can state a finite fault budget or trust assumption rather than treating all failures as unbounded."}, {"display_text": "Operators need to distinguish a safe stall from a safety violation, and need recovery procedures for both.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Under full asynchrony with faults, delay is indistinguishable from failure, so a deterministic protocol cannot guarantee both unbroken progress and safety without adding timing, randomness, failure-detector, trust, or availability assumptions. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: Operators need to distinguish a safe stall from a safety violation, and need recovery procedures for both. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [10], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Operators need to distinguish a safe stall from a safety violation, and need recovery procedures for both.", "Under full asynchrony with faults, delay is indistinguishable from failure, so a deterministic protocol cannot guarantee both unbroken progress and safety without adding timing, randomness, failure-detector, trust, or availability assumptions."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 10, "text": "Operators need to distinguish a safe stall from a safety violation, and need recovery procedures for both."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 5, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-backfill-batch-005", "ledger_sha256": "823445e5543375cf29a4850086257af6c6c07564f0b0b28fdad3ca263a3e819c"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Assumption-Light Inference", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:assumption_light_inference", "slug": "assumption_light_inference"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 5, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 5 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A conclusion depends on more structure than the evidence can responsibly carry. A parametric model, ordinary mean comparison, default test, or standard interval may assume a distribution, independence pattern, measurement scale, or stable process that is not actually established.\n\nThe structural danger is false security. The result can look precise because the method is formal, while the inference is actually fragile because a hidden assumption is carrying the conclusion. The system then mistakes methodological familiarity for evidential strength.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A decision, claim, or comparison is being inferred from evidence through assumptions that may not hold. The procedure may look precise because it uses a formal model, but the conclusion is fragile if the data are small, skewed, outlier-heavy, nonstationary, ordinal, dependent, censored, or otherwise mismatched to the assumed form."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any listed literal drops at least one stated head obligation or the relation connecting them.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed source atom plus the explicit head residual jointly entail the diagnostic head without importing a remedy or goal."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Concept drift requires a generating relationship to change underneath a learned rule, satisfying the changing-process disjunct.", "role_mapping": "Generating process -> data-generating process; moving input-outcome relationship -> changing process; learned rule -> formal model.", "slug": "concept_drift", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b005_a03_b005_a03_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A parametric model, ordinary mean comparison, default test, or standard interval may assume a distribution, independence pattern, measurement scale, or stable process that is not actually established. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The data-generating process is poorly understood, changing, or too heterogeneous for a strong parametric model to be trusted.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The data-generating process is poorly understood, changing, or too heterogeneous for a strong parametric model to be trusted.", "A parametric model, ordinary mean comparison, default test, or standard interval may assume a distribution, independence pattern, measurement scale, or stable process that is not actually established."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Concept Drift", "one_liner": "A learned rule silently loses validity when the input–outcome relationship it was calibrated on changes underneath it.", "page_ref": "prime:concept_drift", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Generating process -> data-generating process; moving input-outcome relationship -> changing process; learned rule -> formal model.", "slug": "concept_drift", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Concept drift requires a generating relationship to change underneath a learned rule, satisfying the changing-process disjunct."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The data-generating process is poorly understood, changing, or too heterogeneous for a strong parametric model to be trusted.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The formal conclusion depends materially on the poorly supported or mismatched assumption identified by the condition.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The formal conclusion depends materially on the poorly supported or mismatched assumption identified by the condition.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any listed literal drops at least one stated head obligation or the relation connecting them.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed source atom plus the explicit head residual jointly entail the diagnostic head without importing a remedy or goal."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a few extreme observations to exert disproportionate influence on a non-resistant aggregate result.", "role_mapping": "Extreme observations -> visible outliers; disproportionate influence -> sample visibly affected by outliers.", "slug": "outlier_leverage", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b005_a03_b005_a03_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The procedure may look precise because it uses a formal model, but the conclusion is fragile if the data are small, skewed, outlier-heavy, nonstationary, ordinal, dependent, censored, or otherwise mismatched to the assumed form. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The sample is small, skewed, heavy-tailed, ordinal, censored, clustered, dependent, or visibly affected by outliers.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The sample is small, skewed, heavy-tailed, ordinal, censored, clustered, dependent, or visibly affected by outliers.", "The procedure may look precise because it uses a formal model, but the conclusion is fragile if the data are small, skewed, outlier-heavy, nonstationary, ordinal, dependent, censored, or otherwise mismatched to the assumed form."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Outlier Leverage", "one_liner": "A small number of extreme observations carry disproportionate weight in an aggregate result, so the result is more a property of those few points than of the bulk of the data — a consequence of the aggregation rule's non-resistance to extremes, not of any sampling defect.", "page_ref": "prime:outlier_leverage", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Extreme observations -> visible outliers; disproportionate influence -> sample visibly affected by outliers.", "slug": "outlier_leverage", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a few extreme observations to exert disproportionate influence on a non-resistant aggregate result."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The sample is small, skewed, heavy-tailed, ordinal, censored, clustered, dependent, or visibly affected by outliers.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The formal conclusion depends materially on the poorly supported or mismatched assumption identified by the condition.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The formal conclusion depends materially on the poorly supported or mismatched assumption identified by the condition.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any listed literal drops at least one stated head obligation or the relation connecting them.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed source atom jointly entail the diagnostic head without importing a remedy or goal."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An explicit distributional commitment does not require the result to change materially under alternative assumptions.", "slug": "distributional_assumption"}, {"falls_short_because": "A robust or distribution-light method does not entail observed sensitivity of a prior formal result.", "slug": "nonparametric_methods"}], "residual_id": "r:assumption_light_inference:b005_a03_b005_a03_c3", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b005_a03_b005_a03_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The result can look precise because the method is formal, while the inference is actually fragile because a hidden assumption is carrying the conclusion. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A formal result changes substantially when distributional assumptions, independence assumptions, or outlier handling are varied.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A formal result changes substantially when distributional assumptions, independence assumptions, or outlier handling are varied.", "The result can look precise because the method is formal, while the inference is actually fragile because a hidden assumption is carrying the conclusion."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An explicit distributional commitment does not require the result to change materially under alternative assumptions.", "slug": "distributional_assumption"}, {"falls_short_because": "A robust or distribution-light method does not entail observed sensitivity of a prior formal result.", "slug": "nonparametric_methods"}], "normalized_requirement": "A formal result changes substantially when distributional assumptions, independence assumptions, or outlier handling are varied.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A formal result changes substantially when distributional assumptions, independence assumptions, or outlier handling are varied.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any listed literal drops at least one stated head obligation or the relation connecting them.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed source atom plus the explicit head residual jointly entail the diagnostic head without importing a remedy or goal."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Accessibility-driven search can occur with a novel method, while familiar-method defaulting can occur without evidence-accessibility differences.", "slug": "streetlight_effect"}], "residual_id": "r:assumption_light_inference:b005_a03_b005_a03_c6", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b005_a03_b005_a03_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "In that situation, the productive move is to surface the assumptions and choose a method or representation that asks less of the evidence. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A default method is being applied because it is familiar rather than because its assumptions match the evidence.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A default method is being applied because it is familiar rather than because its assumptions match the evidence.", "In that situation, the productive move is to surface the assumptions and choose a method or representation that asks less of the evidence."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Accessibility-driven search can occur with a novel method, while familiar-method defaulting can occur without evidence-accessibility differences.", "slug": "streetlight_effect"}], "normalized_requirement": "A default method is being applied because it is familiar rather than because its assumptions match the evidence.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A default method is being applied because it is familiar rather than because its assumptions match the evidence.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The formal conclusion depends materially on the poorly supported or mismatched assumption identified by the condition.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The formal conclusion depends materially on the poorly supported or mismatched assumption identified by the condition.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any listed literal drops at least one stated head obligation or the relation connecting them.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed source atom plus the explicit head residual jointly entail the diagnostic head without importing a remedy or goal."}, "condition_set_id": "B5", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [], "residual_id": "r:assumption_light_inference:b005_a03_b005_a03_c7", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b005_a03_b005_a03_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A parametric model, ordinary mean comparison, default test, or standard interval may assume a distribution, independence pattern, measurement scale, or stable process that is not actually established. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Exploratory work has found a pattern, but confirmation under a strong model would create false confidence.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Exploratory work has found a pattern, but confirmation under a strong model would create false confidence.", "A parametric model, ordinary mean comparison, default test, or standard interval may assume a distribution, independence pattern, measurement scale, or stable process that is not actually established."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "Exploratory work has found a pattern, but confirmation under a strong model would create false confidence.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Exploratory work has found a pattern, but confirmation under a strong model would create false confidence.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The formal conclusion depends materially on the poorly supported or mismatched assumption identified by the condition.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The formal conclusion depends materially on the poorly supported or mismatched assumption identified by the condition.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 5", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Decision-makers need an inference, comparison, or uncertainty statement but cannot justify the usual model requirements.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when a claim, comparison, or uncertainty statement must be made from evidence whose usual assumptions are doubtful. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: Decision-makers need an inference, comparison, or uncertainty statement but cannot justify the usual model requirements. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Decision-makers need an inference, comparison, or uncertainty statement but cannot justify the usual model requirements.", "Use this archetype when a claim, comparison, or uncertainty statement must be made from evidence whose usual assumptions are doubtful."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Decision-makers need an inference, comparison, or uncertainty statement but cannot justify the usual model requirements."}, {"display_text": "The domain has high consequences for overclaiming, and a modest but robust conclusion is preferable to a precise but brittle one.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The result can look precise because the method is formal, while the inference is actually fragile because a hidden assumption is carrying the conclusion. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: The domain has high consequences for overclaiming, and a modest but robust conclusion is preferable to a precise but brittle one. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The domain has high consequences for overclaiming, and a modest but robust conclusion is preferable to a precise but brittle one.", "The result can look precise because the method is formal, while the inference is actually fragile because a hidden assumption is carrying the conclusion."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The domain has high consequences for overclaiming, and a modest but robust conclusion is preferable to a precise but brittle one."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 5, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-backfill-batch-005", "ledger_sha256": "823445e5543375cf29a4850086257af6c6c07564f0b0b28fdad3ca263a3e819c"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Assumption Stress Testing", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:assumption_stress_testing", "slug": "assumption_stress_testing"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 5, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 6, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 5 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Plans often look coherent because their premises stay in the background. A schedule assumes capacity. A policy assumes compliance. A business case assumes adoption. A resilience plan assumes staff, authority, and communications will be available under stress.\n\nThe structural problem is false robustness: the plan appears strong because the conditions required for success are not named, tested, owned, or monitored. When the future violates those premises, the plan fails in ways that seem surprising only because the assumptions were invisible.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A plan, model, strategy, policy, or roadmap appears robust only because its core assumptions have not been surfaced, challenged, or tested against futures in which they are false, reversed, delayed, strained, or only partly true."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any listed literal drops at least one stated head obligation or the relation connecting them.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed source atom plus the explicit head residual jointly entail the diagnostic head without importing a remedy or goal."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime requires a load-bearing assumption to be false or cease to hold; uncertainty or weak evidence alone does not establish failure.", "slug": "model_assumption_failure"}], "residual_id": "r:assumption_stress_testing:b005_a04_b005_a04_c1", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b005_a04_b005_a04_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when a plan, policy, model, roadmap, investment, or response design depends on assumptions that are uncertain, weakly evidenced, high consequence, or socially hard to challenge. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A decision depends on premises that are uncertain, weakly evidenced, politically convenient, or socially hard to question.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A decision depends on premises that are uncertain, weakly evidenced, politically convenient, or socially hard to question.", "Use this archetype when a plan, policy, model, roadmap, investment, or response design depends on assumptions that are uncertain, weakly evidenced, high consequence, or socially hard to challenge."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime requires a load-bearing assumption to be false or cease to hold; uncertainty or weak evidence alone does not establish failure.", "slug": "model_assumption_failure"}], "normalized_requirement": "A decision depends on premises that are uncertain, weakly evidenced, politically convenient, or socially hard to question.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A decision depends on premises that are uncertain, weakly evidenced, politically convenient, or socially hard to question.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The cited premise or pressure is load-bearing and remains insufficiently challenged, making robustness conditional on it.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The cited premise or pressure is load-bearing and remains insufficiently challenged, making robustness conditional on it.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any listed literal drops at least one stated head obligation or the relation connecting them.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed source atom plus the explicit head residual jointly entail the diagnostic head without importing a remedy or goal."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Approval on continuity assumptions does not entail that any assumption is false or that the plan has already lost warrant.", "slug": "model_assumption_failure"}], "residual_id": "r:assumption_stress_testing:b005_a04_b005_a04_c3", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b005_a04_b005_a04_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A plan is being approved on best-case continuity, stable demand, adequate capacity, stakeholder cooperation, regulatory permission, or assumed timing. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A plan is being approved on best-case continuity, stable demand, adequate capacity, stakeholder cooperation, regulatory permission, or assumed timing."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Approval on continuity assumptions does not entail that any assumption is false or that the plan has already lost warrant.", "slug": "model_assumption_failure"}], "normalized_requirement": "A plan is being approved on best-case continuity, stable demand, adequate capacity, stakeholder cooperation, regulatory permission, or assumed timing.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A plan is being approved on best-case continuity, stable demand, adequate capacity, stakeholder cooperation, regulatory permission, or assumed timing.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The cited premise or pressure is load-bearing and remains insufficiently challenged, making robustness conditional on it.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The cited premise or pressure is load-bearing and remains insufficiently challenged, making robustness conditional on it.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any listed literal drops at least one stated head obligation or the relation connecting them.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed source atom plus the explicit head residual jointly entail the diagnostic head without importing a remedy or goal."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Failure to ask what would invalidate a plan does not establish that a load-bearing premise is actually false.", "slug": "model_assumption_failure"}], "residual_id": "r:assumption_stress_testing:b005_a04_b005_a04_c4", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b005_a04_b005_a04_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when a plan, policy, model, roadmap, investment, or response design depends on assumptions that are uncertain, weakly evidenced, high consequence, or socially hard to challenge. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The team has produced a roadmap, forecast, model, business case, policy, or contingency plan but has not asked what assumptions would make it fail.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The team has produced a roadmap, forecast, model, business case, policy, or contingency plan but has not asked what assumptions would make it fail.", "Use this archetype when a plan, policy, model, roadmap, investment, or response design depends on assumptions that are uncertain, weakly evidenced, high consequence, or socially hard to challenge."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Failure to ask what would invalidate a plan does not establish that a load-bearing premise is actually false.", "slug": "model_assumption_failure"}], "normalized_requirement": "The team has produced a roadmap, forecast, model, business case, policy, or contingency plan but has not asked what assumptions would make it fail.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The team has produced a roadmap, forecast, model, business case, policy, or contingency plan but has not asked what assumptions would make it fail.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The cited premise or pressure is load-bearing and remains insufficiently challenged, making robustness conditional on it.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The cited premise or pressure is load-bearing and remains insufficiently challenged, making robustness conditional on it.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any listed literal drops at least one stated head obligation or the relation connecting them.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed source atom plus the explicit head residual jointly entail the diagnostic head without importing a remedy or goal."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Pressure that could suppress challenge is only a risk condition; groupthink requires actual cohesion-driven conformity, dissent suppression, and premature consensus.", "slug": "groupthink"}], "residual_id": "r:assumption_stress_testing:b005_a04_b005_a04_c5", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b005_a04_b005_a04_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Assumptions are necessary for action, but untested assumptions create false confidence; the intervention must challenge premises strongly enough to reveal fragility without turning every uncertainty into paralysis. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: There is pressure for confidence, consensus, speed, or funding that could suppress uncomfortable assumption challenge.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["There is pressure for confidence, consensus, speed, or funding that could suppress uncomfortable assumption challenge.", "Assumptions are necessary for action, but untested assumptions create false confidence; the intervention must challenge premises strongly enough to reveal fragility without turning every uncertainty into paralysis."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Pressure that could suppress challenge is only a risk condition; groupthink requires actual cohesion-driven conformity, dissent suppression, and premature consensus.", "slug": "groupthink"}], "normalized_requirement": "There is pressure for confidence, consensus, speed, or funding that could suppress uncomfortable assumption challenge.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "There is pressure for confidence, consensus, speed, or funding that could suppress uncomfortable assumption challenge.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The cited premise or pressure is load-bearing and remains insufficiently challenged, making robustness conditional on it.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The cited premise or pressure is load-bearing and remains insufficiently challenged, making robustness conditional on it.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any listed literal drops at least one stated head obligation or the relation connecting them.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed source atom plus the explicit head residual jointly entail the diagnostic head without importing a remedy or goal."}, "condition_set_id": "B5", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Known uncertainty without safeguards does not by itself establish a false assumption or lost warrant.", "slug": "model_assumption_failure"}, {"falls_short_because": "An unowned known risk may be extensively monitored or partially safeguarded while diffuse ownership still prevents sufficient action; absence of all safeguards, trigger monitoring, and staged commitment is not mandatory.", "slug": "unowned_known_risk"}], "residual_id": "r:assumption_stress_testing:b005_a04_b005_a04_c6", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b005_a04_b005_a04_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Known uncertainty exists, but the planning process has not converted it into safeguards, trigger monitoring, or staged commitments. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Known uncertainty exists, but the planning process has not converted it into safeguards, trigger monitoring, or staged commitments."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Known uncertainty without safeguards does not by itself establish a false assumption or lost warrant.", "slug": "model_assumption_failure"}, {"falls_short_because": "An unowned known risk may be extensively monitored or partially safeguarded while diffuse ownership still prevents sufficient action; absence of all safeguards, trigger monitoring, and staged commitment is not mandatory.", "slug": "unowned_known_risk"}], "normalized_requirement": "Known uncertainty exists, but the planning process has not converted it into safeguards, trigger monitoring, or staged commitments.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Known uncertainty exists, but the planning process has not converted it into safeguards, trigger monitoring, or staged commitments.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The cited premise or pressure is load-bearing and remains insufficiently challenged, making robustness conditional on it.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The cited premise or pressure is load-bearing and remains insufficiently challenged, making robustness conditional on it.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 5", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The cost of discovering a false assumption after commitment would be high, irreversible, unsafe, or reputationally damaging.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful before major commitments, irreversible investments, public launches, safety-critical deployments, or long-horizon strategies. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: The cost of discovering a false assumption after commitment would be high, irreversible, unsafe, or reputationally damaging. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The cost of discovering a false assumption after commitment would be high, irreversible, unsafe, or reputationally damaging.", "It is especially useful before major commitments, irreversible investments, public launches, safety-critical deployments, or long-horizon strategies."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "The cost of discovering a false assumption after commitment would be high, irreversible, unsafe, or reputationally damaging."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 5, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-backfill-batch-005", "ledger_sha256": "823445e5543375cf29a4850086257af6c6c07564f0b0b28fdad3ca263a3e819c"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Asymmetric Interface Tolerance Calibration", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:asymmetric_interface_tolerance_calibration", "slug": "asymmetric_interface_tolerance_calibration"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 2, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 2 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "An interface connects parties that may produce and interpret artifacts differently, but its strictness settings are implicit, symmetric by assumption, or scattered across implementation details. Producers emit variants, receivers accept or reject them unpredictably, repair behavior is hidden, and the ecosystem learns the wrong contract: either brittle rejection of harmless variation or permissive acceptance that silently expands the protocol.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "An interface connects parties that may produce and interpret artifacts differently, but its strictness settings are implicit, symmetric by assumption, or scattered across implementation details. Producers emit variants, receivers accept or reject them unpredictably, repair behavior is hidden, and the ecosystem learns the wrong contract: either brittle rejection of harmless variation or permissive acceptance that silently expands the protocol."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any listed literal drops at least one stated head obligation or the relation connecting them.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed source atoms plus the explicit head residual jointly entail the diagnostic head without importing a remedy or goal."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a fitted rule to lag a moving input distribution, opening a measurable gap between the rule's assumed world and current inputs.", "role_mapping": "Fitted rule -> written interface; calibration distribution -> nominal artifact envelope; current distribution -> artifacts arriving at the boundary.", "slug": "calibrated_rule_vs_moving_world", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b005_a05_b005_a05_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Legacy versions, optional fields, local dialects, partial compliance, environmental noise, and informal conventions create tolerance pressure. In this condition set, the requirement is: The written or nominal interface differs from real-world artifacts that arrive at the boundary.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The written or nominal interface differs from real-world artifacts that arrive at the boundary."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Calibrated Rule versus Moving World", "one_liner": "A rule, model, or policy fitted to a past distribution of the world degrades as the world it was calibrated on drifts away from that distribution.", "page_ref": "prime:calibrated_rule_vs_moving_world", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Fitted rule -> written interface; calibration distribution -> nominal artifact envelope; current distribution -> artifacts arriving at the boundary.", "slug": "calibrated_rule_vs_moving_world", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a fitted rule to lag a moving input distribution, opening a measurable gap between the rule's assumed world and current inputs."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The written or nominal interface differs from real-world artifacts that arrive at the boundary.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires independently tunable sender/receiver strictness and explicitly carries the short-term interoperability versus long-term drift trade-off.", "role_mapping": "Liberal receiver -> receiver-side leniency; interoperability-now -> compatibility; de-facto-spec drift -> concealed producer defects and expanded obligations.", "slug": "asymmetric_interface_tolerance", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b005_a05_b005_a05_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The decision must account for who pays the cost of repair and who benefits from compatibility. In this condition set, the requirement is: Receiver-side leniency improves short-term compatibility but may conceal producer defects or expand obligations.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Receiver-side leniency improves short-term compatibility but may conceal producer defects or expand obligations."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Asymmetric Interface Tolerance", "one_liner": "At any interface, each side's strictness in enforcing the spec is an independent design parameter, and the four combinations produce qualitatively different long-term equilibria.", "page_ref": "prime:asymmetric_interface_tolerance", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Liberal receiver -> receiver-side leniency; interoperability-now -> compatibility; de-facto-spec drift -> concealed producer defects and expanded obligations.", "slug": "asymmetric_interface_tolerance", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires independently tunable sender/receiver strictness and explicitly carries the short-term interoperability versus long-term drift trade-off."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Receiver-side leniency improves short-term compatibility but may conceal producer defects or expand obligations.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "Strictness policy is implicit or unowned, so compatibility behavior silently rewrites the effective contract.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Strictness policy is implicit or unowned, so compatibility behavior silently rewrites the effective contract.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any listed literal drops at least one stated head obligation or the relation connecting them.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed source atoms plus the explicit head residual jointly entail the diagnostic head without importing a remedy or goal."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a fitted rule to lag a moving input distribution, opening a measurable gap between the rule's assumed world and current inputs.", "role_mapping": "Fitted rule -> written interface; calibration distribution -> nominal artifact envelope; current distribution -> artifacts arriving at the boundary.", "slug": "calibrated_rule_vs_moving_world", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b005_a05_b005_a05_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Legacy versions, optional fields, local dialects, partial compliance, environmental noise, and informal conventions create tolerance pressure. In this condition set, the requirement is: The written or nominal interface differs from real-world artifacts that arrive at the boundary.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The written or nominal interface differs from real-world artifacts that arrive at the boundary."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Calibrated Rule versus Moving World", "one_liner": "A rule, model, or policy fitted to a past distribution of the world degrades as the world it was calibrated on drifts away from that distribution.", "page_ref": "prime:calibrated_rule_vs_moving_world", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Fitted rule -> written interface; calibration distribution -> nominal artifact envelope; current distribution -> artifacts arriving at the boundary.", "slug": "calibrated_rule_vs_moving_world", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a fitted rule to lag a moving input distribution, opening a measurable gap between the rule's assumed world and current inputs."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The written or nominal interface differs from real-world artifacts that arrive at the boundary.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A silently drifting measurement reference is not a temporary interface exception becoming permanent.", "slug": "reference_standard_decay"}, {"falls_short_because": "Carryover between sequential observations on one unit is not persistence of an unretired compatibility exception.", "slug": "washout_failure"}], "residual_id": "r:asymmetric_interface_tolerance_calibration:b005_a05_b005_a05_c7", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b005_a05_b005_a05_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Unbounded tolerance becomes the actual standard. In this condition set, the requirement is: A temporary compatibility exception risks becoming permanent because no one measures or retires it.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A temporary compatibility exception risks becoming permanent because no one measures or retires it."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A silently drifting measurement reference is not a temporary interface exception becoming permanent.", "slug": "reference_standard_decay"}, {"falls_short_because": "Carryover between sequential observations on one unit is not persistence of an unretired compatibility exception.", "slug": "washout_failure"}], "normalized_requirement": "A temporary compatibility exception risks becoming permanent because no one measures or retires it.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A temporary compatibility exception risks becoming permanent because no one measures or retires it.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "Strictness policy is implicit or unowned, so compatibility behavior silently rewrites the effective contract.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Strictness policy is implicit or unowned, so compatibility behavior silently rewrites the effective contract.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A sender and receiver, producer and consumer, client and server, agency and applicant, or upstream and downstream system exchange structured artifacts.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The artifacts may be messages, records, documents, forms, commands, events, policies, designs, or physical interface outputs. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: A sender and receiver, producer and consumer, client and server, agency and applicant, or upstream and downstream system exchange structured artifacts. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A sender and receiver, producer and consumer, client and server, agency and applicant, or upstream and downstream system exchange structured artifacts.", "The artifacts may be messages, records, documents, forms, commands, events, policies, designs, or physical interface outputs."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "A sender and receiver, producer and consumer, client and server, agency and applicant, or upstream and downstream system exchange structured artifacts."}, {"display_text": "Strict rejection protects integrity but may cause service interruption, exclusion, churn, or avoidable operational burden.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Over-strict interfaces can be correct in theory and unusable in practice. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: Strict rejection protects integrity but may cause service interruption, exclusion, churn, or avoidable operational burden. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Strict rejection protects integrity but may cause service interruption, exclusion, churn, or avoidable operational burden.", "Over-strict interfaces can be correct in theory and unusable in practice."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Strict rejection protects integrity but may cause service interruption, exclusion, churn, or avoidable operational burden."}, {"display_text": "There are multiple producers, receivers, versions, or organizations using the same interface.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Diversity makes asymmetric strictness choices consequential and politically visible. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: There are multiple producers, receivers, versions, or organizations using the same interface. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["There are multiple producers, receivers, versions, or organizations using the same interface.", "Diversity makes asymmetric strictness choices consequential and politically visible."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "There are multiple producers, receivers, versions, or organizations using the same interface."}, {"display_text": "Security, safety, legal, or semantic risk depends on whether off-spec artifacts are interpreted, repaired, or rejected.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Permissive acceptance must not become unauthorized execution or meaning invention. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: Security, safety, legal, or semantic risk depends on whether off-spec artifacts are interpreted, repaired, or rejected. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Security, safety, legal, or semantic risk depends on whether off-spec artifacts are interpreted, repaired, or rejected.", "Permissive acceptance must not become unauthorized execution or meaning invention."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Security, safety, legal, or semantic risk depends on whether off-spec artifacts are interpreted, repaired, or rejected."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 5, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-backfill-batch-005", "ledger_sha256": "823445e5543375cf29a4850086257af6c6c07564f0b0b28fdad3ca263a3e819c"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Asynchronous Replica Convergence", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:asynchronous_replica_convergence", "slug": "asynchronous_replica_convergence"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 1 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 1}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A shared object is copied across sites, devices, teams, jurisdictions, or services that cannot continuously coordinate. Each copy may need to accept local updates, but the organization lacks a complete contract for temporary divergence and later convergence. Updates arrive out of order or more than once; a stale replica overwrites newer work; two valid concurrent changes are collapsed by timestamp; deletions reappear after old copies reconnect; conflict counts grow without ownership; or replicas appear healthy while their update frontiers never meet. The system has availability but no convergence guarantee, or agreement but only by making every local action depend on a remote coordinator.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A shared object is copied across sites, devices, teams, jurisdictions, or services that cannot continuously coordinate. Each copy may need to accept local updates, but the organization lacks a complete contract for temporary divergence and later convergence. Updates arrive out of order or more than once; a stale replica overwrites newer work; two valid concurrent changes are collapsed by timestamp; deletions reappear after old copies reconnect; conflict counts grow without ownership; or replicas appear healthy while their update frontiers never meet. The system has availability but no convergence guarantee, or agreement but only by making every local action depend on a remote coordinator."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any listed literal drops at least one stated head obligation or the relation connecting them.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed source atoms plus the explicit head residual jointly entail the diagnostic head without importing a remedy or goal."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The organization lacks a complete convergence, conflict, tombstone, and recovery contract for those replicas.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The organization lacks a complete convergence, conflict, tombstone, and recovery contract for those replicas.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Several replicas, caches, branches, field devices, regional services, or administrative sites hold overlapping shared state.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A shared object is copied across sites, devices, teams, jurisdictions, or services that cannot continuously coordinate. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Several replicas, caches, branches, field devices, regional services, or administrative sites hold overlapping shared state. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Several replicas, caches, branches, field devices, regional services, or administrative sites hold overlapping shared state.", "A shared object is copied across sites, devices, teams, jurisdictions, or services that cannot continuously coordinate."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "Several replicas, caches, branches, field devices, regional services, or administrative sites hold overlapping shared state."}, {"display_text": "Communication can be delayed, reordered, duplicated, interrupted, or temporarily unavailable.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Communication can be delayed, reordered, duplicated, interrupted, or temporarily unavailable. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Communication can be delayed, reordered, duplicated, interrupted, or temporarily unavailable."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "Communication can be delayed, reordered, duplicated, interrupted, or temporarily unavailable."}, {"display_text": "Local reads or writes must continue for at least some operations during disconnection or coordination failure.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Immediate global agreement requires coordination and may block during delay or partition; local availability permits progress but creates divergent histories. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Local reads or writes must continue for at least some operations during disconnection or coordination failure. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Local reads or writes must continue for at least some operations during disconnection or coordination failure.", "Immediate global agreement requires coordination and may block during delay or partition; local availability permits progress but creates divergent histories."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Local reads or writes must continue for at least some operations during disconnection or coordination failure."}, {"display_text": "There is a meaningful semantic equivalence criterion for the shared state after the same update evidence is known.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The archetype trades temporary consistency for availability only where merge semantics, staleness limits, and repair evidence make later equivalence credible. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: There is a meaningful semantic equivalence criterion for the shared state after the same update evidence is known. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["There is a meaningful semantic equivalence criterion for the shared state after the same update evidence is known.", "The archetype trades temporary consistency for availability only where merge semantics, staleness limits, and repair evidence make later equivalence credible."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "There is a meaningful semantic equivalence criterion for the shared state after the same update evidence is known."}, {"display_text": "Update conflicts can be classified into automatically mergeable, deterministically selectable, compensable, or human-resolved classes.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Updates arrive out of order or more than once; a stale replica overwrites newer work; two valid concurrent changes are collapsed by timestamp; deletions reappear after old copies reconnect; conflict counts grow without ownership; or replicas appear healthy while their update frontiers never meet. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: Update conflicts can be classified into automatically mergeable, deterministically selectable, compensable, or human-resolved classes. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Update conflicts can be classified into automatically mergeable, deterministically selectable, compensable, or human-resolved classes.", "Updates arrive out of order or more than once; a stale replica overwrites newer work; two valid concurrent changes are collapsed by timestamp; deletions reappear after old copies reconnect; conflict counts grow without ownership; or replicas appear healthy while their update frontiers never meet."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Update conflicts can be classified into automatically mergeable, deterministically selectable, compensable, or human-resolved classes."}, {"display_text": "Replica lag, missing history, or convergence progress can be observed and repaired.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Immediate global agreement requires coordination and may block during delay or partition; local availability permits progress but creates divergent histories. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: Replica lag, missing history, or convergence progress can be observed and repaired. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Replica lag, missing history, or convergence progress can be observed and repaired.", "Immediate global agreement requires coordination and may block during delay or partition; local availability permits progress but creates divergent histories."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Replica lag, missing history, or convergence progress can be observed and repaired."}, {"display_text": "Strong global coordination for every operation would impose unacceptable latency, fragility, cost, or loss of autonomy.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Immediate global agreement requires coordination and may block during delay or partition; local availability permits progress but creates divergent histories. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: Strong global coordination for every operation would impose unacceptable latency, fragility, cost, or loss of autonomy. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Strong global coordination for every operation would impose unacceptable latency, fragility, cost, or loss of autonomy.", "Immediate global agreement requires coordination and may block during delay or partition; local availability permits progress but creates divergent histories."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "Strong global coordination for every operation would impose unacceptable latency, fragility, cost, or loss of autonomy."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 5, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-backfill-batch-005", "ledger_sha256": "823445e5543375cf29a4850086257af6c6c07564f0b0b28fdad3ca263a3e819c"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Attention Budgeting", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:attention_budgeting", "slug": "attention_budgeting"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 5, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 5, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 6 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 5 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is unmanaged competition for limited attention. A person, team, control room, audience, classroom, or leadership body can only inspect, interpret, decide, and act on a limited number of things at once. When demand exceeds capacity, attention gets allocated by accidental forces: urgency, novelty, salience, hierarchy, emotional charge, political pressure, or whatever channel is hardest to ignore.\n\nThis creates recognizable symptoms. Critical signals are missed despite being present. Routine interruptions displace deep work. Alerts lose credibility. Meeting agendas are captured by status reporting. Important but non-urgent concerns receive no attention until they become emergencies. Weak signals remain background noise because no one owns the background monitoring lane.\n\nThe core tension is focus versus vigilance. Too little focus creates scattered effort and decision fatigue. Too much focus creates tunnel vision. The archetype resolves this by designing different lanes of attention rather than pretending all demands can receive full attention simultaneously.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Multiple stimuli, tasks, channels, risks, requests, or decisions compete for a limited pool of human or organizational attention. Without an explicit allocation, attention is captured by salience, urgency, novelty, interruption, politics, or default routines rather than by the value and risk structure of the work."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any listed literal drops at least one stated head obligation or the relation connecting them.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed source atom plus the explicit head residual jointly entail the diagnostic head without importing a remedy or goal."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Capacity exceedance can cause missed signals, but it does not require the missed signals to be critical; the materiality qualifier is not universally entailed.", "slug": "attentional_capacity"}], "residual_id": "r:attention_budgeting:b005_a07_b005_a07_c1", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b005_a07_b005_a07_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Critical signals are missed despite being present. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Critical signals are missed even though they were technically visible.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Critical signals are missed even though they were technically visible.", "Critical signals are missed despite being present."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Capacity exceedance can cause missed signals, but it does not require the missed signals to be critical; the materiality qualifier is not universally entailed.", "slug": "attentional_capacity"}], "normalized_requirement": "Critical signals are missed even though they were technically visible.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Critical signals are missed even though they were technically visible.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The observed overload or miss results from capture by salience, urgency, interruption, politics, or default rather than explicit value-risk allocation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The observed overload or miss results from capture by salience, urgency, interruption, politics, or default rather than explicit value-risk allocation.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any listed literal drops at least one stated head obligation or the relation connecting them.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed source atom plus the explicit head residual jointly entail the diagnostic head without importing a remedy or goal."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime requires unsolicited pro-social contributions, a coordinator gate, and refusal cost; an urgent interruption need not have any of those roles.", "slug": "helpful_inflow_displacement"}], "residual_id": "r:attention_budgeting:b005_a07_b005_a07_c2", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b005_a07_b005_a07_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Important but non-urgent concerns receive no attention until they become emergencies. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Urgent interruptions repeatedly crowd out important non-urgent work.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Urgent interruptions repeatedly crowd out important non-urgent work.", "Important but non-urgent concerns receive no attention until they become emergencies."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime requires unsolicited pro-social contributions, a coordinator gate, and refusal cost; an urgent interruption need not have any of those roles.", "slug": "helpful_inflow_displacement"}], "normalized_requirement": "Urgent interruptions repeatedly crowd out important non-urgent work.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Urgent interruptions repeatedly crowd out important non-urgent work.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The observed overload or miss results from capture by salience, urgency, interruption, politics, or default rather than explicit value-risk allocation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The observed overload or miss results from capture by salience, urgency, interruption, politics, or default rather than explicit value-risk allocation.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any listed literal drops at least one stated head obligation or the relation connecting them.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed source atom plus the explicit head residual jointly entail the diagnostic head without importing a remedy or goal."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime is substrate-general and includes nonhuman bounded selectors, while the source atom is restricted to teams, operators, leaders, or learners; that favorable subtype restriction is not a legal role mapping.", "slug": "attentional_capacity"}], "residual_id": "r:attention_budgeting:b005_a07_b005_a07_c3", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b005_a07_b005_a07_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The pattern fits systems where high-value work is crowded out by routine signals, where alerts are ignored because there are too many, where leaders spend all agenda time on urgent status updates, or where weak signals disappear until they become crises. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Teams, operators, leaders, or learners face too many channels at once.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Teams, operators, leaders, or learners face too many channels at once.", "The pattern fits systems where high-value work is crowded out by routine signals, where alerts are ignored because there are too many, where leaders spend all agenda time on urgent status updates, or where weak signals disappear until they become crises."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime is substrate-general and includes nonhuman bounded selectors, while the source atom is restricted to teams, operators, leaders, or learners; that favorable subtype restriction is not a legal role mapping.", "slug": "attentional_capacity"}], "normalized_requirement": "Teams, operators, leaders, or learners face too many channels at once.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Teams, operators, leaders, or learners face too many channels at once.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The observed overload or miss results from capture by salience, urgency, interruption, politics, or default rather than explicit value-risk allocation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The observed overload or miss results from capture by salience, urgency, interruption, politics, or default rather than explicit value-risk allocation.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any listed literal drops at least one stated head obligation or the relation connecting them.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed source atom plus the explicit head residual jointly entail the diagnostic head without importing a remedy or goal."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires repeated low-specificity signal firings to drive an emergent ignore equilibrium in which the channel remains active but is no longer acted upon.", "role_mapping": "Repeated signal firings -> multiplying alerts/messages; ignore equilibrium -> people ignore them.", "slug": "habituation_to_repeated_signal", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b005_a07_b005_a07_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The pattern fits systems where high-value work is crowded out by routine signals, where alerts are ignored because there are too many, where leaders spend all agenda time on urgent status updates, or where weak signals disappear until they become crises. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Alerts, dashboards, meetings, or messages multiply until people ignore them.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Alerts, dashboards, meetings, or messages multiply until people ignore them.", "The pattern fits systems where high-value work is crowded out by routine signals, where alerts are ignored because there are too many, where leaders spend all agenda time on urgent status updates, or where weak signals disappear until they become crises."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Habituation to Repeated Signal", "one_liner": "A signal channel meant to recruit attention to a flagged condition loses its recruiting power as exposure accumulates, through the compounding of receiver habituation and base-rate degradation, until the channel is noisily active but informationally bankrupt.", "page_ref": "prime:habituation_to_repeated_signal", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Repeated signal firings -> multiplying alerts/messages; ignore equilibrium -> people ignore them.", "slug": "habituation_to_repeated_signal", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires repeated low-specificity signal firings to drive an emergent ignore equilibrium in which the channel remains active but is no longer acted upon."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Alerts, dashboards, meetings, or messages multiply until people ignore them.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The observed overload or miss results from capture by salience, urgency, interruption, politics, or default rather than explicit value-risk allocation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The observed overload or miss results from capture by salience, urgency, interruption, politics, or default rather than explicit value-risk allocation.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any listed literal drops at least one stated head obligation or the relation connecting them.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed source atom plus the explicit head residual jointly entail the diagnostic head without importing a remedy or goal."}, "condition_set_id": "B5", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A bottleneck may be any limiting stage and does not require leadership or expert attention as the constrained resource.", "slug": "bottleneck"}, {"falls_short_because": "Expert guidance scarcity limits mediated support, but does not universally make leadership attention the binding stage for decisions.", "slug": "mediator_availability_constraint"}], "residual_id": "r:attention_budgeting:b005_a07_b005_a07_c7", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b005_a07_b005_a07_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Multiple stimuli, tasks, channels, risks, requests, or decisions compete for a limited pool of human or organizational attention. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Leadership or expert attention is the bottleneck for decisions.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Leadership or expert attention is the bottleneck for decisions.", "Multiple stimuli, tasks, channels, risks, requests, or decisions compete for a limited pool of human or organizational attention."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A bottleneck may be any limiting stage and does not require leadership or expert attention as the constrained resource.", "slug": "bottleneck"}, {"falls_short_because": "Expert guidance scarcity limits mediated support, but does not universally make leadership attention the binding stage for decisions.", "slug": "mediator_availability_constraint"}], "normalized_requirement": "Leadership or expert attention is the bottleneck for decisions.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Leadership or expert attention is the bottleneck for decisions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The observed overload or miss results from capture by salience, urgency, interruption, politics, or default rather than explicit value-risk allocation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The observed overload or miss results from capture by salience, urgency, interruption, politics, or default rather than explicit value-risk allocation.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 5", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Background risks or weak signals need periodic awareness but cannot be foregrounded continuously.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Weak signals remain background noise because no one owns the background monitoring lane. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: Background risks or weak signals need periodic awareness but cannot be foregrounded continuously. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Background risks or weak signals need periodic awareness but cannot be foregrounded continuously.", "Weak signals remain background noise because no one owns the background monitoring lane."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Background risks or weak signals need periodic awareness but cannot be foregrounded continuously."}, {"display_text": "High-value work requires sustained focus rather than quick glances.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Without an explicit allocation, attention is captured by salience, urgency, novelty, interruption, politics, or default routines rather than by the value and risk structure of the work. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: High-value work requires sustained focus rather than quick glances. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["High-value work requires sustained focus rather than quick glances.", "Without an explicit allocation, attention is captured by salience, urgency, novelty, interruption, politics, or default routines rather than by the value and risk structure of the work."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "High-value work requires sustained focus rather than quick glances."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 5, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-backfill-batch-005", "ledger_sha256": "823445e5543375cf29a4850086257af6c6c07564f0b0b28fdad3ca263a3e819c"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Attenuated Threat Inoculation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:attenuated_threat_inoculation", "slug": "attenuated_threat_inoculation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 2 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 2}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A foreseeable threat will arrive later in a stronger, faster, more persuasive, or more adversarial form than the receiver can safely learn from on first contact. If the receiver remains naive until then, the first full-strength exposure may shape beliefs, trigger panic, exploit trust, bypass verification, or overwhelm action before correction can work.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A foreseeable threat will arrive later in a stronger, faster, more persuasive, or more adversarial form than the receiver can safely learn from on first contact. If the receiver remains naive until then, the first full-strength exposure may shape beliefs, trigger panic, exploit trust, bypass verification, or overwhelm action before correction can work."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any listed literal drops at least one stated head obligation or the relation connecting them.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed source atom plus the explicit head residual jointly entail the diagnostic head without importing a remedy or goal."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Inoculation describes the successful preparation mechanism—weak exposure plus refutation producing resistance—not a receiver whose defense remains dormant or unpracticed.", "slug": "inoculation_theory"}], "residual_id": "r:attenuated_threat_inoculation:b005_a08_b005_a08_c2", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b005_a08_b005_a08_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The system must expose the receiver to enough of the threat to activate resistance, while withholding enough intensity, vividness, repetition, or operational detail to avoid teaching, spreading, legitimizing, traumatizing, or recruiting for the threat. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The receiver has some defensive capacity, but it is dormant, unpracticed, poorly cued, or too abstract to activate under pressure.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The receiver has some defensive capacity, but it is dormant, unpracticed, poorly cued, or too abstract to activate under pressure.", "The system must expose the receiver to enough of the threat to activate resistance, while withholding enough intensity, vividness, repetition, or operational detail to avoid teaching, spreading, legitimizing, traumatizing, or recruiting for the threat."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Inoculation describes the successful preparation mechanism—weak exposure plus refutation producing resistance—not a receiver whose defense remains dormant or unpracticed.", "slug": "inoculation_theory"}], "normalized_requirement": "The receiver has some defensive capacity, but it is dormant, unpracticed, poorly cued, or too abstract to activate under pressure.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The receiver has some defensive capacity, but it is dormant, unpracticed, poorly cued, or too abstract to activate under pressure.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The unpracticed defense concerns a foreseeable stronger threat whose first full exposure can outrun correction.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The unpracticed defense concerns a foreseeable stronger threat whose first full exposure can outrun correction.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A threat family is predictable enough to preview without needing to know the exact future instance.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The system must expose the receiver to enough of the threat to activate resistance, while withholding enough intensity, vividness, repetition, or operational detail to avoid teaching, spreading, legitimizing, traumatizing, or recruiting for the threat. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: A threat family is predictable enough to preview without needing to know the exact future instance. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A threat family is predictable enough to preview without needing to know the exact future instance.", "The system must expose the receiver to enough of the threat to activate resistance, while withholding enough intensity, vividness, repetition, or operational detail to avoid teaching, spreading, legitimizing, traumatizing, or recruiting for the threat."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "A threat family is predictable enough to preview without needing to know the exact future instance."}, {"display_text": "Reactive correction after full exposure is likely to be late, distrusted, socially costly, or less memorable than the original threat.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "If the receiver remains naive until then, the first full-strength exposure may shape beliefs, trigger panic, exploit trust, bypass verification, or overwhelm action before correction can work. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: Reactive correction after full exposure is likely to be late, distrusted, socially costly, or less memorable than the original threat. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Reactive correction after full exposure is likely to be late, distrusted, socially costly, or less memorable than the original threat.", "If the receiver remains naive until then, the first full-strength exposure may shape beliefs, trigger panic, exploit trust, bypass verification, or overwhelm action before correction can work."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Reactive correction after full exposure is likely to be late, distrusted, socially costly, or less memorable than the original threat."}, {"display_text": "A weakened example can be constructed without causing the same harm as the full threat.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: A weakened example can be constructed without causing the same harm as the full threat. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A weakened example can be constructed without causing the same harm as the full threat."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "A weakened example can be constructed without causing the same harm as the full threat."}, {"display_text": "Successful resistance depends on recognizing a pattern, not merely memorizing one prohibited claim or action.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: Successful resistance depends on recognizing a pattern, not merely memorizing one prohibited claim or action. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Successful resistance depends on recognizing a pattern, not merely memorizing one prohibited claim or action."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Successful resistance depends on recognizing a pattern, not merely memorizing one prohibited claim or action."}, {"display_text": "The receiver must retain agency and trust; coercive or manipulative preparation would undermine the intervention.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "If the receiver remains naive until then, the first full-strength exposure may shape beliefs, trigger panic, exploit trust, bypass verification, or overwhelm action before correction can work. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: The receiver must retain agency and trust; coercive or manipulative preparation would undermine the intervention. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The receiver must retain agency and trust; coercive or manipulative preparation would undermine the intervention.", "If the receiver remains naive until then, the first full-strength exposure may shape beliefs, trigger panic, exploit trust, bypass verification, or overwhelm action before correction can work."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The receiver must retain agency and trust; coercive or manipulative preparation would undermine the intervention."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 5, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-backfill-batch-005", "ledger_sha256": "823445e5543375cf29a4850086257af6c6c07564f0b0b28fdad3ca263a3e819c"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Attractor Landscape Shaping and Basin Steering", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:attractor_landscape_shaping_and_basin_steering", "slug": "attractor_landscape_shaping_and_basin_steering"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 7, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 5, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 8 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 7 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 8}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Nonlinear systems can have several stable outcomes under the same broad rules. Feedback amplifies some deviations and damps others. Constraints and topology channel trajectories. Delays create oscillations. Expectations make conventions self-fulfilling. Once the state enters a basin, ordinary fluctuations decay toward the associated attractor.\n\nThis defeats endpoint-only interventions. A team is told to collaborate, a service is reset, a habitat is restored superficially, or an optimizer is restarted, but the same incentives, thresholds, resource flows, and feedback remain. The observed state improves briefly and then returns. Repetition increases cost without increasing capture probability.\n\nThe opposite problem is lock-in. A stable pattern can be resilient to valuable evidence and correction. Deepening its basin may lower variance while reducing learning, diversity, mobility, or exit. In organizations and institutions, landscape shaping can become coercive when authorities manipulate payoffs, information, or sanctions so alternatives are technically possible but practically unreachable.\n\nBasin boundaries are often uncertain and mobile. They can be fractal, history dependent, affected by hidden variables, or shifted by external conditions. A model estimated from normal operations may fail near critical boundaries. A lever that appears local can change a competitor’s basin or create a new attractor elsewhere.\n\nTransient paths add risk. Even if the target is viable, reaching it may require crossing a region of instability, low service, ecological vulnerability, social conflict, or financial exposure. Strong control can overshoot. Slow control can leave the system exposed too long. The design must govern the corridor as carefully as the destination.\n\nFinally, attractor desirability is a governance question. System-level output, order, or persistence cannot decide whose welfare counts, which variation is legitimate, or who may impose the control. Selection precedes optimization.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system repeatedly settles into an undesirable but self-reinforcing state, oscillation, norm, operating mode, ecological regime, queue pattern, local optimum, or coordination equilibrium. Direct correction changes the state briefly but not the dynamics that pull it back. Alternatively, several desirable and harmful stable patterns coexist and ordinary actions cannot reliably select among them. Basin boundaries may be narrow, uncertain, path dependent, moving, or hidden behind sparse observations. A strong intervention can cross the boundary but pass through unsafe states, overshoot into another attractor, or create brittle dependence on continuous control."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any listed literal drops at least one stated head obligation or the relation connecting them.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed source atom jointly entail the diagnostic head without importing a remedy or goal."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The existence of basin geometry does not require that repeated resets or reforms have actually been attempted and decayed.", "slug": "attractor_selection_and_basin_control"}, {"falls_short_because": "A tendency to return after perturbation does not require repeated reforms or the same observed recurrence history.", "slug": "stability"}], "residual_id": "r:attractor_landscape_shaping_and_basin_steering:b005_a09_b005_a09_c1", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b005_a09_b005_a09_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when the system repeatedly relapses after repair, reform, reset, or rescue. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: repeated resets or reforms decay back into the same pattern.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["repeated resets or reforms decay back into the same pattern", "Use this archetype when the system repeatedly relapses after repair, reform, reset, or rescue."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The existence of basin geometry does not require that repeated resets or reforms have actually been attempted and decayed.", "slug": "attractor_selection_and_basin_control"}, {"falls_short_because": "A tendency to return after perturbation does not require repeated reforms or the same observed recurrence history.", "slug": "stability"}], "normalized_requirement": "repeated resets or reforms decay back into the same pattern", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "repeated resets or reforms decay back into the same pattern", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any listed literal drops at least one stated head obligation or the relation connecting them.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed source atom plus the explicit head residual jointly entail the diagnostic head without importing a remedy or goal."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires multiple attractors whose selected outcome depends on initial conditions and basin boundaries, so nearby starts across a separatrix can yield qualitatively different end states.", "role_mapping": "Initial-condition dependence -> small starting-state differences; different attractors -> qualitatively different long-run outcomes.", "slug": "attractor_selection_and_basin_control", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b005_a09_b005_a09_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use it when small differences in starting state lead to qualitatively different outcomes, when a desired regime exists but is difficult to enter, when a harmful regime is easy to enter and hard to leave, or when actors remain coordinated on an inferior convention because unilateral switching is costly. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: small differences in starting state produce qualitatively different long-run outcomes.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["small differences in starting state produce qualitatively different long-run outcomes", "Use it when small differences in starting state lead to qualitatively different outcomes, when a desired regime exists but is difficult to enter, when a harmful regime is easy to enter and hard to leave, or when actors remain coordinated on an inferior convention because unilateral switching is costly."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Attractor Selection and Basin Control", "one_liner": "System dynamics directed toward stable states via basin manipulation.", "page_ref": "prime:attractor_selection_and_basin_control", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Initial-condition dependence -> small starting-state differences; different attractors -> qualitatively different long-run outcomes.", "slug": "attractor_selection_and_basin_control", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires multiple attractors whose selected outcome depends on initial conditions and basin boundaries, so nearby starts across a separatrix can yield qualitatively different end states."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "small differences in starting state produce qualitatively different long-run outcomes", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The stable-state geometry is undesirable in context and ordinary action cannot reliably enter or retain the preferred basin without governing transition dynamics.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The stable-state geometry is undesirable in context and ordinary action cannot reliably enter or retain the preferred basin without governing transition dynamics.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any listed literal drops at least one stated head obligation or the relation connecting them.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed source atom plus the explicit head residual jointly entail the diagnostic head without importing a remedy or goal."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A Nash equilibrium is stable against unilateral deviation but need not be inferior or a convention held by an organization or population.", "slug": "nash_equilibrium"}], "residual_id": "r:attractor_landscape_shaping_and_basin_steering:b005_a09_b005_a09_c3", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b005_a09_b005_a09_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It also fits optimization trapped in local minima, ecosystems with alternative stable regimes, operations with recurrent overload cycles, and organizations whose routines re-form after reorganization. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: an organization or population coordinates on an inferior but stable convention.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["an organization or population coordinates on an inferior but stable convention", "It also fits optimization trapped in local minima, ecosystems with alternative stable regimes, operations with recurrent overload cycles, and organizations whose routines re-form after reorganization."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A Nash equilibrium is stable against unilateral deviation but need not be inferior or a convention held by an organization or population.", "slug": "nash_equilibrium"}], "normalized_requirement": "an organization or population coordinates on an inferior but stable convention", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "an organization or population coordinates on an inferior but stable convention", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The stable-state geometry is undesirable in context and ordinary action cannot reliably enter or retain the preferred basin without governing transition dynamics.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The stable-state geometry is undesirable in context and ordinary action cannot reliably enter or retain the preferred basin without governing transition dynamics.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any listed literal drops at least one stated head obligation or the relation connecting them.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed source atom plus the explicit head residual jointly entail the diagnostic head without importing a remedy or goal."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Some valid regime changes are policy-driven or lack a distinct reverse threshold; hysteresis is common but not universal, so a different recovery threshold is not entailed.", "slug": "regime_change"}], "residual_id": "r:attractor_landscape_shaping_and_basin_steering:b005_a09_b005_a09_c4", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b005_a09_b005_a09_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: recovery succeeds only after a different threshold than the one that caused decline. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["recovery succeeds only after a different threshold than the one that caused decline"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Some valid regime changes are policy-driven or lack a distinct reverse threshold; hysteresis is common but not universal, so a different recovery threshold is not entailed.", "slug": "regime_change"}], "normalized_requirement": "recovery succeeds only after a different threshold than the one that caused decline", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "recovery succeeds only after a different threshold than the one that caused decline", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The stable-state geometry is undesirable in context and ordinary action cannot reliably enter or retain the preferred basin without governing transition dynamics.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The stable-state geometry is undesirable in context and ordinary action cannot reliably enter or retain the preferred basin without governing transition dynamics.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any listed literal drops at least one stated head obligation or the relation connecting them.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed source atom plus the explicit head residual jointly entail the diagnostic head without importing a remedy or goal."}, "condition_set_id": "B5", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime expressly requires multiple stable states and their basins.", "role_mapping": "Multiple attractors -> multiple local optima, stable cycles, regimes, or equilibria.", "slug": "attractor_selection_and_basin_control", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime requires at least two stable feedback-locked regimes separated by a threshold.", "role_mapping": "Alternative regimes -> multiple stable regimes; feedback lock -> self-reinforcing equilibria.", "slug": "regime_change", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime requires a low and high self-sustaining regime separated by a basin threshold.", "role_mapping": "Low/high attractors -> multiple self-reinforcing equilibria; threshold -> basin boundary.", "slug": "threshold_bounded_vicious_cycle", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b005_a09_b005_a09_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system repeatedly settles into an undesirable but self-reinforcing state, oscillation, norm, operating mode, ecological regime, queue pattern, local optimum, or coordination equilibrium. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: a system has multiple local optima, stable cycles, regimes, or self-reinforcing equilibria.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["a system has multiple local optima, stable cycles, regimes, or self-reinforcing equilibria", "A system repeatedly settles into an undesirable but self-reinforcing state, oscillation, norm, operating mode, ecological regime, queue pattern, local optimum, or coordination equilibrium."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Attractor Selection and Basin Control", "one_liner": "System dynamics directed toward stable states via basin manipulation.", "page_ref": "prime:attractor_selection_and_basin_control", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Multiple attractors -> multiple local optima, stable cycles, regimes, or equilibria.", "slug": "attractor_selection_and_basin_control", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime expressly requires multiple stable states and their basins."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Regime Change", "one_liner": "A discontinuous flip of a system from one stable operating regime to a qualitatively different one, where the same inputs produce fundamentally different responses on either side of a feedback-driven threshold.", "page_ref": "prime:regime_change", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Alternative regimes -> multiple stable regimes; feedback lock -> self-reinforcing equilibria.", "slug": "regime_change", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires at least two stable feedback-locked regimes separated by a threshold."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Threshold Bounded Vicious Cycle", "one_liner": "A system has a low regime that consumes any small input as maintenance and a high self-sustaining regime, separated by a threshold an intervention must clear in both magnitude and duration.", "page_ref": "prime:threshold_bounded_vicious_cycle", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Low/high attractors -> multiple self-reinforcing equilibria; threshold -> basin boundary.", "slug": "threshold_bounded_vicious_cycle", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a low and high self-sustaining regime separated by a basin threshold."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "a system has multiple local optima, stable cycles, regimes, or self-reinforcing equilibria", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The stable-state geometry is undesirable in context and ordinary action cannot reliably enter or retain the preferred basin without governing transition dynamics.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The stable-state geometry is undesirable in context and ordinary action cannot reliably enter or retain the preferred basin without governing transition dynamics.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 5", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any listed literal drops at least one stated head obligation or the relation connecting them.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed source atom plus the explicit head residual jointly entail the diagnostic head without importing a remedy or goal."}, "condition_set_id": "B6", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Multiple basins do not require that one desired basin be unusually small or inaccessible under ordinary trajectories.", "slug": "attractor_selection_and_basin_control"}], "residual_id": "r:attractor_landscape_shaping_and_basin_steering:b005_a09_b005_a09_c6", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b005_a09_b005_a09_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Once the state enters a basin, ordinary fluctuations decay toward the associated attractor. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: a desired state exists but its basin is too small or inaccessible under ordinary trajectories.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["a desired state exists but its basin is too small or inaccessible under ordinary trajectories", "Once the state enters a basin, ordinary fluctuations decay toward the associated attractor."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Multiple basins do not require that one desired basin be unusually small or inaccessible under ordinary trajectories.", "slug": "attractor_selection_and_basin_control"}], "normalized_requirement": "a desired state exists but its basin is too small or inaccessible under ordinary trajectories", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "a desired state exists but its basin is too small or inaccessible under ordinary trajectories", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The stable-state geometry is undesirable in context and ordinary action cannot reliably enter or retain the preferred basin without governing transition dynamics.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The stable-state geometry is undesirable in context and ordinary action cannot reliably enter or retain the preferred basin without governing transition dynamics.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 6", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any listed literal drops at least one stated head obligation or the relation connecting them.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed source atom plus the explicit head residual jointly entail the diagnostic head without importing a remedy or goal."}, "condition_set_id": "B7", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The low deficit regime is self-reinforcing, actively absorbs small corrective inputs, and requires an above-threshold sustained pulse to escape, so it is hard to leave.", "role_mapping": "Low-equilibrium attractor -> harmful state; active consumption and threshold -> hard to leave; feedback -> enlarged persistence.", "slug": "threshold_bounded_vicious_cycle", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b005_a09_b005_a09_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use it when small differences in starting state lead to qualitatively different outcomes, when a desired regime exists but is difficult to enter, when a harmful regime is easy to enter and hard to leave, or when actors remain coordinated on an inferior convention because unilateral switching is costly. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: a harmful state is easy to enter, hard to leave, or enlarged by existing feedback.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["a harmful state is easy to enter, hard to leave, or enlarged by existing feedback", "Use it when small differences in starting state lead to qualitatively different outcomes, when a desired regime exists but is difficult to enter, when a harmful regime is easy to enter and hard to leave, or when actors remain coordinated on an inferior convention because unilateral switching is costly."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Threshold Bounded Vicious Cycle", "one_liner": "A system has a low regime that consumes any small input as maintenance and a high self-sustaining regime, separated by a threshold an intervention must clear in both magnitude and duration.", "page_ref": "prime:threshold_bounded_vicious_cycle", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Low-equilibrium attractor -> harmful state; active consumption and threshold -> hard to leave; feedback -> enlarged persistence.", "slug": "threshold_bounded_vicious_cycle", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The low deficit regime is self-reinforcing, actively absorbs small corrective inputs, and requires an above-threshold sustained pulse to escape, so it is hard to leave."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "a harmful state is easy to enter, hard to leave, or enlarged by existing feedback", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The stable-state geometry is undesirable in context and ordinary action cannot reliably enter or retain the preferred basin without governing transition dynamics.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The stable-state geometry is undesirable in context and ordinary action cannot reliably enter or retain the preferred basin without governing transition dynamics.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 7", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "transition policy focuses on the destination while ignoring capture and settling dynamics.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Do not use it for an ordinary one-time project transition whose destination does not need to become self-maintaining. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: transition policy focuses on the destination while ignoring capture and settling dynamics. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["transition policy focuses on the destination while ignoring capture and settling dynamics", "Do not use it for an ordinary one-time project transition whose destination does not need to become self-maintaining."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 8, "text": "transition policy focuses on the destination while ignoring capture and settling dynamics"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 5, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-backfill-batch-005", "ledger_sha256": "823445e5543375cf29a4850086257af6c6c07564f0b0b28fdad3ca263a3e819c"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Attrition and Dropout Monitoring", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:attrition_and_dropout_monitoring", "slug": "attrition_and_dropout_monitoring"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A comparison is designed around an eligible or assigned population, but some units stop contributing data before the endpoint. When dropout depends on treatment condition, baseline characteristics, burden, adverse experience, or emerging outcome status, the analyzed sample is no longer exchangeable with the intended comparison frame.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A comparison is designed around an eligible or assigned population, but some units stop contributing data before the endpoint. When dropout depends on treatment condition, baseline characteristics, burden, adverse experience, or emerging outcome status, the analyzed sample is no longer exchangeable with the intended comparison frame."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any listed literal drops at least one stated head obligation or the relation connecting them.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed source atoms plus the explicit head residual jointly entail the diagnostic head without importing a remedy or goal."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P001-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must govern contribution of final unit-level outcomes, not merely intermediate data or generic participation.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The contributed object is a final outcome for a unit in the intended observation frame.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail that the contributing unit's retention status controls whether its final outcome is observed.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A unit's contribution of a final outcome is conditioned on its endpoint-retention status.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the universal 'only if' restriction to the union of completion and continued endpoint reachability; it may not admit a contributor satisfying neither status.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Every unit contributing a final outcome must satisfy at least one of the two listed retention statuses.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must place the contribution gate at the final endpoint rather than at an unspecified or earlier time.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The restriction concerns final outcomes and reachability at the endpoint.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this contributing-unit branch, the candidate must identify completion as a sufficient listed qualification without excluding other contributors that qualify through endpoint reachability.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "For an individual contributing unit, the qualifying retention status is completion.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this contributing-unit branch, the candidate must identify continued endpoint reachability as a sufficient listed qualification without excluding other contributors that qualify through completion.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "For an individual contributing unit, the qualifying retention status is continued reachability at endpoint.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A unit contributes a final outcome only if it is a completer or remains reachable at endpoint.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "a final-outcome-contributing unit must satisfy an endpoint retention condition", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P001-C02-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Completer-only outcomes establish one retention gate, while the prime requires an ordered multi-gate reporting pipeline and differential layerwise capture.", "slug": "reporting_pyramid_undercount"}], "residual_id": "r:attrition_and_dropout_monitoring:b005_a10_b005_a10_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b005_a10_b005_a10_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A comparison is designed around an eligible or assigned population, but some units stop contributing data before the endpoint. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Final outcomes are observed only for completers or for units still reachable at endpoint.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Final outcomes are observed only for completers or for units still reachable at endpoint.", "A comparison is designed around an eligible or assigned population, but some units stop contributing data before the endpoint."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Completer-only outcomes establish one retention gate, while the prime requires an ordered multi-gate reporting pipeline and differential layerwise capture.", "slug": "reporting_pyramid_undercount"}], "normalized_requirement": "Final outcomes are observed only for completers or for units still reachable at endpoint.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Final outcomes are observed only for completers or for units still reachable at endpoint.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P001-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require an attrition or dropout rate measured before final completion, not a generic adverse metric.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The measured quantity is a preliminary dropout rate.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail an above-baseline comparison against an ex-ante planned assumption, not merely change over time.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The preliminary dropout rate exceeds a planned assumption for that rate.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve that the evidence is preliminary rather than available only after the endpoint.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The comparison is made at a preliminary stage.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "Preliminary dropout rates exceed planned assumptions.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "preliminary dropout rate exceeds its planned baseline", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P001-C03-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P001-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must compare attrition or dropout rates belonging to the study's comparison groups.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The compared quantities are dropout rates indexed by comparison group.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail separation between group-specific dropout rates, not merely a high pooled rate.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The group-specific dropout rates are diverging from one another.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the incipient preliminary timing expressed by 'begin to diverge.'", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The divergence is preliminary and has begun rather than being asserted only as a final settled difference.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must use between-group attrition as the comparison, not a plan target or historical rate.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The comparison baseline is the dropout rate of another comparison group.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Preliminary dropout rates begin to diverge between comparison groups.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "group-specific dropout rates begin to diverge", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P001-C03-U2"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Divergent dropout rates do not require ordered reporting filters with multiplicative capture fractions.", "slug": "reporting_pyramid_undercount"}, {"falls_short_because": "Selection bias includes loss to follow-up but does not require preliminary dropout rates or between-group attrition divergence in every valid instance.", "slug": "selection_bias"}], "residual_id": "r:attrition_and_dropout_monitoring:b005_a10_b005_a10_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b005_a10_b005_a10_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Experimental design tries to hold comparison groups stable, but participation is itself a dynamic response to the intervention, context, incentives, and measurement process. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Preliminary dropout rates exceed planned assumptions or begin to diverge between comparison groups.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Preliminary dropout rates exceed planned assumptions or begin to diverge between comparison groups.", "Experimental design tries to hold comparison groups stable, but participation is itself a dynamic response to the intervention, context, incentives, and measurement process."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 2, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 2}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Divergent dropout rates do not require ordered reporting filters with multiplicative capture fractions.", "slug": "reporting_pyramid_undercount"}, {"falls_short_because": "Selection bias includes loss to follow-up but does not require preliminary dropout rates or between-group attrition divergence in every valid instance.", "slug": "selection_bias"}], "normalized_requirement": "Preliminary dropout rates exceed planned assumptions or begin to diverge between comparison groups.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 2 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Preliminary dropout rates exceed planned assumptions or begin to diverge between comparison groups.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "Loss to follow-up is outcome- or exposure-dependent enough to destroy exchangeability between completers and the intended comparison frame.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Loss to follow-up is outcome- or exposure-dependent enough to destroy exchangeability between completers and the intended comparison frame.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The study requires repeated contact, follow-up measurement, attendance, adherence, or continued platform use.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The study requires repeated contact, follow-up measurement, attendance, adherence, or continued platform use. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The study requires repeated contact, follow-up measurement, attendance, adherence, or continued platform use."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "The study requires repeated contact, follow-up measurement, attendance, adherence, or continued platform use."}, {"display_text": "Treatment conditions differ in burden, risk, attractiveness, stigma, cost, inconvenience, or perceived benefit.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "When dropout depends on treatment condition, baseline characteristics, burden, adverse experience, or emerging outcome status, the analyzed sample is no longer exchangeable with the intended comparison frame. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Treatment conditions differ in burden, risk, attractiveness, stigma, cost, inconvenience, or perceived benefit. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Treatment conditions differ in burden, risk, attractiveness, stigma, cost, inconvenience, or perceived benefit.", "When dropout depends on treatment condition, baseline characteristics, burden, adverse experience, or emerging outcome status, the analyzed sample is no longer exchangeable with the intended comparison frame."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "Treatment conditions differ in burden, risk, attractiveness, stigma, cost, inconvenience, or perceived benefit."}, {"display_text": "Subgroups face unequal practical barriers to continued participation, such as transportation, device access, schedule flexibility, language, or trust.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Subgroups face unequal practical barriers to continued participation, such as transportation, device access, schedule flexibility, language, or trust. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Subgroups face unequal practical barriers to continued participation, such as transportation, device access, schedule flexibility, language, or trust."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Subgroups face unequal practical barriers to continued participation, such as transportation, device access, schedule flexibility, language, or trust."}, {"display_text": "Regulators, reviewers, or decision makers will need to know whether loss to follow-up threatens the study claim.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: Regulators, reviewers, or decision makers will need to know whether loss to follow-up threatens the study claim. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Regulators, reviewers, or decision makers will need to know whether loss to follow-up threatens the study claim."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Regulators, reviewers, or decision makers will need to know whether loss to follow-up threatens the study claim."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 5, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-backfill-batch-005", "ledger_sha256": "823445e5543375cf29a4850086257af6c6c07564f0b0b28fdad3ca263a3e819c"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Attrition Contest Exit Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:attrition_contest_exit_design", "slug": "attrition_contest_exit_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 2, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 5, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 2 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A conflict, competition, negotiation, funding dispute, queue, lawsuit, bidding contest, strike, platform fight, internal political battle, or strategic standoff has become an endurance test. Participants pay continuing costs that are sunk as they are paid, and each party hopes the other will concede first. Because concession is interpreted as weakness, loss of reputation, or surrender of future bargaining power, parties continue after the expected value of winning has declined below the cumulative cost of fighting.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A conflict, competition, negotiation, funding dispute, queue, lawsuit, bidding contest, strike, platform fight, internal political battle, or strategic standoff has become an endurance test. Participants pay continuing costs that are sunk as they are paid, and each party hopes the other will concede first. Because concession is interpreted as weakness, loss of reputation, or surrender of future bargaining power, parties continue after the expected value of winning has declined below the cumulative cost of fighting."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any listed literal drops at least one stated head obligation or the relation connecting them.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed source atoms jointly entail the diagnostic head without importing a remedy or goal."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires an indivisible last-one-standing prize awarded to the party that persists after the others quit.", "role_mapping": "Last-one-standing prize -> valuable position, budget, territory, concession, market, precedent, or status outcome.", "slug": "war_of_attrition", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b005_a11_b005_a11_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The contest has a valuable prize, position, budget, territory, concession, market, precedent, or status outcome. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The contest has a valuable prize, position, budget, territory, concession, market, precedent, or status outcome."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "War Of Attrition", "one_liner": "A contest decided by who pays continuously the longest, with all paid cost sunk and the prize dissipated in the paying.", "page_ref": "prime:war_of_attrition", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Last-one-standing prize -> valuable position, budget, territory, concession, market, precedent, or status outcome.", "slug": "war_of_attrition", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires an indivisible last-one-standing prize awarded to the party that persists after the others quit."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The contest has a valuable prize, position, budget, territory, concession, market, precedent, or status outcome.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a continuous cost flow paid per unit of persistence.", "role_mapping": "Continuous pay-to-stay cost -> ongoing time, money, attention, disruption, risk, stress, opportunity, or reputation cost.", "slug": "war_of_attrition", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b005_a11_b005_a11_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Participants pay continuing costs that are sunk as they are paid, and each party hopes the other will concede first. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Parties pay ongoing time, money, attention, disruption, risk, stress, opportunity, or reputational costs while waiting.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Parties pay ongoing time, money, attention, disruption, risk, stress, opportunity, or reputational costs while waiting.", "Participants pay continuing costs that are sunk as they are paid, and each party hopes the other will concede first."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "War Of Attrition", "one_liner": "A contest decided by who pays continuously the longest, with all paid cost sunk and the prize dissipated in the paying.", "page_ref": "prime:war_of_attrition", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Continuous pay-to-stay cost -> ongoing time, money, attention, disruption, risk, stress, opportunity, or reputation cost.", "slug": "war_of_attrition", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a continuous cost flow paid per unit of persistence."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Parties pay ongoing time, money, attention, disruption, risk, stress, opportunity, or reputational costs while waiting.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "All costs already paid in the prime are irrevocably sunk and cannot be recovered by conceding.", "role_mapping": "Paid persistence costs -> sunk costs; concession -> withdrawal without recovery.", "slug": "war_of_attrition", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b005_a11_b005_a11_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Participants pay continuing costs that are sunk as they are paid, and each party hopes the other will concede first. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Paid costs are largely sunk and cannot be recovered if the party withdraws.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Paid costs are largely sunk and cannot be recovered if the party withdraws.", "Participants pay continuing costs that are sunk as they are paid, and each party hopes the other will concede first."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "War Of Attrition", "one_liner": "A contest decided by who pays continuously the longest, with all paid cost sunk and the prize dissipated in the paying.", "page_ref": "prime:war_of_attrition", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Paid persistence costs -> sunk costs; concession -> withdrawal without recovery.", "slug": "war_of_attrition", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "All costs already paid in the prime are irrevocably sunk and cannot be recovered by conceding."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Paid costs are largely sunk and cannot be recovered if the party withdraws.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Private valuation or pain thresholds under mutual uncertainty are mandatory components of the contest.", "role_mapping": "Private threshold -> endurance, resources, pain tolerance, reservation value, or willingness to concede.", "slug": "war_of_attrition", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b005_a11_b005_a11_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A party may need to show resolve to avoid exploitation, but when resolve is proven only by burning resources longer than the other side, the signal destroys value and traps all parties in mutually costly endurance. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Each party has private information about endurance, resources, pain tolerance, reservation value, or willingness to concede.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Each party has private information about endurance, resources, pain tolerance, reservation value, or willingness to concede.", "A party may need to show resolve to avoid exploitation, but when resolve is proven only by burning resources longer than the other side, the signal destroys value and traps all parties in mutually costly endurance."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "War Of Attrition", "one_liner": "A contest decided by who pays continuously the longest, with all paid cost sunk and the prize dissipated in the paying.", "page_ref": "prime:war_of_attrition", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Private threshold -> endurance, resources, pain tolerance, reservation value, or willingness to concede.", "slug": "war_of_attrition", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Private valuation or pain thresholds under mutual uncertainty are mandatory components of the contest."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Each party has private information about endurance, resources, pain tolerance, reservation value, or willingness to concede.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any listed literal drops at least one stated head obligation or the relation connecting them.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed source atom plus the explicit head residual jointly entail the diagnostic head without importing a remedy or goal."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's equilibrium dissipates the prize in accumulated persistence costs, driving expected surplus toward zero.", "role_mapping": "Prize dissipation -> prize loses net value or victory becomes Pyrrhic as costs grow.", "slug": "war_of_attrition", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b005_a11_b005_a11_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Because concession is interpreted as weakness, loss of reputation, or surrender of future bargaining power, parties continue after the expected value of winning has declined below the cumulative cost of fighting. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The prize loses value as the contest continues, or the cost of winning grows until victory is Pyrrhic.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The prize loses value as the contest continues, or the cost of winning grows until victory is Pyrrhic.", "Because concession is interpreted as weakness, loss of reputation, or surrender of future bargaining power, parties continue after the expected value of winning has declined below the cumulative cost of fighting."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "War Of Attrition", "one_liner": "A contest decided by who pays continuously the longest, with all paid cost sunk and the prize dissipated in the paying.", "page_ref": "prime:war_of_attrition", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Prize dissipation -> prize loses net value or victory becomes Pyrrhic as costs grow.", "slug": "war_of_attrition", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's equilibrium dissipates the prize in accumulated persistence costs, driving expected surplus toward zero."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The prize loses value as the contest continues, or the cost of winning grows until victory is Pyrrhic.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The value loss occurs inside an ongoing last-party-standing contest with sunk flow costs and uncertain thresholds.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The value loss occurs inside an ongoing last-party-standing contest with sunk flow costs and uncertain thresholds.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Quitting is treated as a signal of weakness, poor judgment, disloyalty, guilt, lack of commitment, or loss of face.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Because concession is interpreted as weakness, loss of reputation, or surrender of future bargaining power, parties continue after the expected value of winning has declined below the cumulative cost of fighting. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Quitting is treated as a signal of weakness, poor judgment, disloyalty, guilt, lack of commitment, or loss of face. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Quitting is treated as a signal of weakness, poor judgment, disloyalty, guilt, lack of commitment, or loss of face.", "Because concession is interpreted as weakness, loss of reputation, or surrender of future bargaining power, parties continue after the expected value of winning has declined below the cumulative cost of fighting."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Quitting is treated as a signal of weakness, poor judgment, disloyalty, guilt, lack of commitment, or loss of face."}, {"display_text": "Existing governance rewards toughness, consistency, escalation, or visible commitment more than efficient settlement.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The archetype manages the tension between credible commitment and efficient exit. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Existing governance rewards toughness, consistency, escalation, or visible commitment more than efficient settlement. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Existing governance rewards toughness, consistency, escalation, or visible commitment more than efficient settlement.", "The archetype manages the tension between credible commitment and efficient exit."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "Existing governance rewards toughness, consistency, escalation, or visible commitment more than efficient settlement."}, {"display_text": "No trusted procedure exists for time-bounding, arbitrating, splitting, pausing, or reframing the contest.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: No trusted procedure exists for time-bounding, arbitrating, splitting, pausing, or reframing the contest. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["No trusted procedure exists for time-bounding, arbitrating, splitting, pausing, or reframing the contest."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 8, "text": "No trusted procedure exists for time-bounding, arbitrating, splitting, pausing, or reframing the contest."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 5, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-backfill-batch-005", "ledger_sha256": "823445e5543375cf29a4850086257af6c6c07564f0b0b28fdad3ca263a3e819c"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Audience-Boundary Signal Spillover Governance", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:audience_boundary_signal_spillover_governance", "slug": "audience_boundary_signal_spillover_governance"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A signal is intended to influence one audience or channel, but the surrounding audience topology is porous. Adjacent audiences receive or infer the signal, interpret it through their own histories and incentives, and create reactions that the original apparatus was not designed to absorb.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A signal is intended to influence one audience or channel, but the surrounding audience topology is porous. Adjacent audiences receive or infer the signal, interpret it through their own histories and incentives, and create reactions that the original apparatus was not designed to absorb."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any listed literal drops at least one stated head obligation or the relation connecting them.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed source atoms jointly entail the diagnostic head without importing a remedy or goal."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a sender to transmit a signal intended for a particular target audience.", "role_mapping": "Sender/targeted audience -> bounded signaling attempt.", "slug": "boundary_signal_spillover", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b005_a12_b005_a12_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Bounded signaling is attempted. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Bounded signaling is attempted"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Boundary Signal Spillover", "one_liner": "A signal aimed at one audience reaches adjacent audiences whose own response overflows the planner's apparatus.", "page_ref": "prime:boundary_signal_spillover", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Sender/targeted audience -> bounded signaling attempt.", "slug": "boundary_signal_spillover", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a sender to transmit a signal intended for a particular target audience."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Bounded signaling is attempted", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a permeable carrier whose reach cannot be confined to the intended audience.", "role_mapping": "Permeable carrier -> porous audience boundary; adjacent received audience -> spillover audience.", "slug": "boundary_signal_spillover", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b005_a12_b005_a12_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A signal is intended to influence one audience or channel, but the surrounding audience topology is porous. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Audience boundaries are porous.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Audience boundaries are porous", "A signal is intended to influence one audience or channel, but the surrounding audience topology is porous."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Boundary Signal Spillover", "one_liner": "A signal aimed at one audience reaches adjacent audiences whose own response overflows the planner's apparatus.", "page_ref": "prime:boundary_signal_spillover", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Permeable carrier -> porous audience boundary; adjacent received audience -> spillover audience.", "slug": "boundary_signal_spillover", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a permeable carrier whose reach cannot be confined to the intended audience."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Audience boundaries are porous", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The adjacent audience must apply its own locally rational decision calculus, different from the sender's model of the target audience.", "role_mapping": "Receiver-side calculus -> adjacent interpretation.", "slug": "boundary_signal_spillover", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b005_a12_b005_a12_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Selective signaling needs boundaries, but communication channels, audiences, and interpretations are porous; the more visible or salient the signal, the more likely adjacent audiences are to react as if they were part of the design. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Adjacent interpretation differs.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Adjacent interpretation differs", "Selective signaling needs boundaries, but communication channels, audiences, and interpretations are porous; the more visible or salient the signal, the more likely adjacent audiences are to react as if they were part of the design."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Boundary Signal Spillover", "one_liner": "A signal aimed at one audience reaches adjacent audiences whose own response overflows the planner's apparatus.", "page_ref": "prime:boundary_signal_spillover", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Receiver-side calculus -> adjacent interpretation.", "slug": "boundary_signal_spillover", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The adjacent audience must apply its own locally rational decision calculus, different from the sender's model of the target audience."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Adjacent interpretation differs", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires the adjacent response to overload an apparatus sized only for the intended audience.", "role_mapping": "Target-scoped apparatus -> response channel; overflow invariant -> capacity limit exceeded.", "slug": "boundary_signal_spillover", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "Every information-bearing response medium has a hard reliable-throughput ceiling.", "role_mapping": "Information-bearing medium -> response channel; capacity ceiling -> capacity-limited response.", "slug": "channel_capacity", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b005_a12_b005_a12_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Response channels are capacity-limited. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Response channels are capacity-limited"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Boundary Signal Spillover", "one_liner": "A signal aimed at one audience reaches adjacent audiences whose own response overflows the planner's apparatus.", "page_ref": "prime:boundary_signal_spillover", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Target-scoped apparatus -> response channel; overflow invariant -> capacity limit exceeded.", "slug": "boundary_signal_spillover", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires the adjacent response to overload an apparatus sized only for the intended audience."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Channel Capacity", "one_liner": "Any information-bearing medium has a hard upper bound on reliable throughput that effort cannot exceed.", "page_ref": "prime:channel_capacity", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Information-bearing medium -> response channel; capacity ceiling -> capacity-limited response.", "slug": "channel_capacity", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Every information-bearing response medium has a hard reliable-throughput ceiling."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Response channels are capacity-limited", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Legitimacy or harm stakes exist.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: Legitimacy or harm stakes exist. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Legitimacy or harm stakes exist"]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Legitimacy or harm stakes exist"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 5, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-backfill-batch-005", "ledger_sha256": "823445e5543375cf29a4850086257af6c6c07564f0b0b28fdad3ca263a3e819c"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Audience-Conditioned Behavior Calibration", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:audience_conditioned_behavior_calibration", "slug": "audience_conditioned_behavior_calibration"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 4, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 4 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Behavior is observed inside a social field. The participant anticipates how visible action will affect reputation, belonging, status, employment, access, safety, moral identity, credit, reciprocity, or future treatment. That anticipation may change what is said, whether anything is said, how much effort is contributed, how risk is reported, and whether a promise is kept. The observer then mistakes the visible behavior for a stable trait or preference.\n\nSeveral pathways can produce the same public-private difference. A person may conform because disagreement is costly; learn from credible peers and rationally revise; signal loyalty; avoid humiliating someone; suppress uncertainty; exaggerate virtue; withhold a stigmatized experience; make a public commitment that increases follow-through; or join a visible contribution because reciprocity is now observable. Without a mechanism diagnosis, the same intervention can help one pathway and harm another.\n\nPower makes nominally equal publicness unequal. A junior employee speaking before an executive, a patient speaking before a caregiver, a student speaking before a grader, or a contractor speaking before a buyer faces consequences unlike those of a high-status participant. A small invitation-only forum can create more pressure than a large anonymous one. Aggregate averages can conceal this asymmetry.\n\nThe structural remedy is to specify purpose, audience, power, identity exposure, sequence, aggregation, persistence, and consequences as part of the intervention. The design must make room for protected independence, shared learning, and accountable commitment in the proportions the task actually requires.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A decision, report, evaluation, contribution, or behavioral observation occurs under an audience condition that changes the incentives and perceived risks of expression. The system then mistakes a context-conditioned response for stable preference or genuine agreement. Public elicitation may suppress unpopular knowledge, inflate compliance, and expose vulnerable participants. Fully private elicitation may remove commitment, shared reasoning, contestability, and accountability. Anonymous aggregation may protect candor but invite manipulation or make follow-up impossible. Without an explicit comparison and governance loop, designers cannot tell whether observed convergence reflects learning, reputation management, coercion, strategic signaling, or selection into the visible forum."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any listed literal drops at least one stated head obligation or the relation connecting them.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed source atom plus the explicit head residual jointly entail the diagnostic head without importing a remedy or goal."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires audience presence and reputational incentives to produce behavioral divergence relative to private context.", "role_mapping": "Audience presence -> names, roles, rankings, peers, leaders, clients, or cameras; behavioral divergence -> changed responses.", "slug": "public_vs_private_contexts", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b005_a13_b005_a13_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use it after deployment when behavior changes unexpectedly after names, cameras, reaction counts, leader attendance, publication, or archival search are introduced. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: responses change when names, roles, rankings, peers, leaders, clients, or cameras are present.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["responses change when names, roles, rankings, peers, leaders, clients, or cameras are present", "Use it after deployment when behavior changes unexpectedly after names, cameras, reaction counts, leader attendance, publication, or archival search are introduced."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Public vs. Private Contexts", "one_liner": "Audience presence alters motivation and behavior through reputation.", "page_ref": "prime:public_vs_private_contexts", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Audience presence -> names, roles, rankings, peers, leaders, clients, or cameras; behavioral divergence -> changed responses.", "slug": "public_vs_private_contexts", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires audience presence and reputational incentives to produce behavioral divergence relative to private context."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "responses change when names, roles, rankings, peers, leaders, clients, or cameras are present", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The observing system treats the audience-conditioned response as stable preference, genuine agreement, or context-free evidence.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The observing system treats the audience-conditioned response as stable preference, genuine agreement, or context-free evidence.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any listed literal drops at least one stated head obligation or the relation connecting them.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed source atom jointly entail the diagnostic head without importing a remedy or goal."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires public convergence on an action no member privately endorses because polite assent or silence is misread as preference.", "role_mapping": "Public convergence -> public unanimity; rejecting private preferences -> private doubt; post-hoc revelation -> later reversal or disclosure.", "slug": "abilene_paradox", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b005_a13_b005_a13_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Common signals include striking unanimity in public paired with private doubt, low follow-through after ceremonial agreement, anonymous complaints that never appear in meetings, sharp differences between named and unnamed reviews, reluctance to report errors near powerful actors, or contributions that increase or decrease when rankings and credit are visible. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: public unanimity coexists with private doubt, later reversal, anonymous complaints, or low follow-through.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["public unanimity coexists with private doubt, later reversal, anonymous complaints, or low follow-through", "Common signals include striking unanimity in public paired with private doubt, low follow-through after ceremonial agreement, anonymous complaints that never appear in meetings, sharp differences between named and unnamed reviews, reluctance to report errors near powerful actors, or contributions that increase or decrease when rankings and credit are visible."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Abilene Paradox", "one_liner": "A group converges on an action no member privately endorses because each misreads the others' silence or polite assent as genuine preference, so the aggregation channel filters out exactly the disagreement that would have revealed the better option.", "page_ref": "prime:abilene_paradox", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Public convergence -> public unanimity; rejecting private preferences -> private doubt; post-hoc revelation -> later reversal or disclosure.", "slug": "abilene_paradox", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires public convergence on an action no member privately endorses because polite assent or silence is misread as preference."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "public unanimity coexists with private doubt, later reversal, anonymous complaints, or low follow-through", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any listed literal drops at least one stated head obligation or the relation connecting them.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed source atom plus the explicit head residual jointly entail the diagnostic head without importing a remedy or goal."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Reputational consequence is mandatory: audience presence changes the payoff structure of expression through image and status incentives.", "role_mapping": "Reputational consequence -> retaliation, stigma, status loss, exclusion, or reputational reward; expression -> response.", "slug": "public_vs_private_contexts", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b005_a13_b005_a13_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A junior employee speaking before an executive, a patient speaking before a caregiver, a student speaking before a grader, or a contractor speaking before a buyer faces consequences unlike those of a high-status participant. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: participants face retaliation, stigma, status loss, exclusion, or reputational reward for a response.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["participants face retaliation, stigma, status loss, exclusion, or reputational reward for a response", "A junior employee speaking before an executive, a patient speaking before a caregiver, a student speaking before a grader, or a contractor speaking before a buyer faces consequences unlike those of a high-status participant."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Public vs. Private Contexts", "one_liner": "Audience presence alters motivation and behavior through reputation.", "page_ref": "prime:public_vs_private_contexts", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Reputational consequence -> retaliation, stigma, status loss, exclusion, or reputational reward; expression -> response.", "slug": "public_vs_private_contexts", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Reputational consequence is mandatory: audience presence changes the payoff structure of expression through image and status incentives."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "participants face retaliation, stigma, status loss, exclusion, or reputational reward for a response", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The observing system treats the audience-conditioned response as stable preference, genuine agreement, or context-free evidence.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The observing system treats the audience-conditioned response as stable preference, genuine agreement, or context-free evidence.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any listed literal drops at least one stated head obligation or the relation connecting them.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed source atom plus the explicit head residual jointly entail the diagnostic head without importing a remedy or goal."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Learning from another's behavior can occur without online popularity, identity, reaction counts, durable history, or exposure before independent judgment.", "slug": "observational_learning_social_learning"}], "residual_id": "r:audience_conditioned_behavior_calibration:b005_a13_b005_a13_c6", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b005_a13_b005_a13_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use it after deployment when behavior changes unexpectedly after names, cameras, reaction counts, leader attendance, publication, or archival search are introduced. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: an online system exposes popularity, identity, reaction counts, or durable history before independent judgment.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["an online system exposes popularity, identity, reaction counts, or durable history before independent judgment", "Use it after deployment when behavior changes unexpectedly after names, cameras, reaction counts, leader attendance, publication, or archival search are introduced."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Learning from another's behavior can occur without online popularity, identity, reaction counts, durable history, or exposure before independent judgment.", "slug": "observational_learning_social_learning"}], "normalized_requirement": "an online system exposes popularity, identity, reaction counts, or durable history before independent judgment", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "an online system exposes popularity, identity, reaction counts, or durable history before independent judgment", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The observing system treats the audience-conditioned response as stable preference, genuine agreement, or context-free evidence.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The observing system treats the audience-conditioned response as stable preference, genuine agreement, or context-free evidence.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "a visible contribution or commitment may improve coordination but also distort intrinsic motivation.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A person may conform because disagreement is costly; learn from credible peers and rationally revise; signal loyalty; avoid humiliating someone; suppress uncertainty; exaggerate virtue; withhold a stigmatized experience; make a public commitment that increases follow-through; or join a visible contribution because reciprocity is now observable. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: a visible contribution or commitment may improve coordination but also distort intrinsic motivation. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["a visible contribution or commitment may improve coordination but also distort intrinsic motivation", "A person may conform because disagreement is costly; learn from credible peers and rationally revise; signal loyalty; avoid humiliating someone; suppress uncertainty; exaggerate virtue; withhold a stigmatized experience; make a public commitment that increases follow-through; or join a visible contribution because reciprocity is now observable."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "a visible contribution or commitment may improve coordination but also distort intrinsic motivation"}, {"display_text": "evaluators need candid evidence and a legitimate public decision without treating either stage as ground truth.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The archetype is also useful when public and private evidence already conflict. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: evaluators need candid evidence and a legitimate public decision without treating either stage as ground truth. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["evaluators need candid evidence and a legitimate public decision without treating either stage as ground truth", "The archetype is also useful when public and private evidence already conflict."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "evaluators need candid evidence and a legitimate public decision without treating either stage as ground truth"}, {"display_text": "sensitive reporting, health, education, employment, or civic participation requires both protection and due process.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Examples include candor and accountability, independent judgment and collective learning, privacy and safety follow-up, minority protection and legitimate commitment, confidential evaluation and public trust, or anonymous participation and eligibility control. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: sensitive reporting, health, education, employment, or civic participation requires both protection and due process. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["sensitive reporting, health, education, employment, or civic participation requires both protection and due process", "Examples include candor and accountability, independent judgment and collective learning, privacy and safety follow-up, minority protection and legitimate commitment, confidential evaluation and public trust, or anonymous participation and eligibility control."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "sensitive reporting, health, education, employment, or civic participation requires both protection and due process"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 5, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-backfill-batch-005", "ledger_sha256": "823445e5543375cf29a4850086257af6c6c07564f0b0b28fdad3ca263a3e819c"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Authentic Practice Environment", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:authentic_practice_environment", "slug": "authentic_practice_environment"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 2, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 4 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 1 of 2 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a gap between **training conditions** and **use conditions**. Training often removes exactly the messiness that makes real performance hard: partial information, interruptions, stakeholder pressure, tool limits, time constraints, exception cases, policy ambiguity, or consequences. Learners therefore master the exercise rather than the real capability.\n\nThe failure is not always visible inside the training program. Completion rates, quiz scores, and learner confidence can look strong while field performance remains weak. Authentic practice makes the transfer gap inspectable by designing practice around the conditions that actually shape the target behavior.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Training or rehearsal tasks are decontextualized, simplified, or artificial, so learners can succeed in the training environment while failing to recognize cues, manage constraints, coordinate, or act effectively in the real environment."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any listed literal drops at least one stated head obligation or the relation connecting them.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed source atom jointly entail the diagnostic head without importing a remedy or goal."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires preserved competence in a preparation environment and degraded performance in a systematically different deployment environment.", "role_mapping": "Preparation environment -> classroom, quiz, tutorial, or sandbox; deployment environment -> real work; competence gap -> pass training but struggle in practice.", "slug": "training_serving_skew", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b005_a14_b005_a14_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Learners therefore master the exercise rather than the real capability. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Learners pass classroom, quiz, tutorial, or sandbox exercises but struggle when the work includes real ambiguity, timing, stakeholders, tools, or consequences.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Learners pass classroom, quiz, tutorial, or sandbox exercises but struggle when the work includes real ambiguity, timing, stakeholders, tools, or consequences.", "Learners therefore master the exercise rather than the real capability."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Training Serving Skew", "one_liner": "A system prepared in one environment silently underperforms in a systematically different one.", "page_ref": "prime:training_serving_skew", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Preparation environment -> classroom, quiz, tutorial, or sandbox; deployment environment -> real work; competence gap -> pass training but struggle in practice.", "slug": "training_serving_skew", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires preserved competence in a preparation environment and degraded performance in a systematically different deployment environment."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Learners pass classroom, quiz, tutorial, or sandbox exercises but struggle when the work includes real ambiguity, timing, stakeholders, tools, or consequences.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any listed literal drops at least one stated head obligation or the relation connecting them.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed source atoms plus the explicit head residual jointly entail the diagnostic head without importing a remedy or goal."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Practice-task realism is not necessarily an authoritative prescribed model bridged by tacit enacted work.", "slug": "procedure_work_mismatch"}], "residual_id": "r:authentic_practice_environment:b005_a14_b005_a14_c3", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b005_a14_b005_a14_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Authentic practice makes the transfer gap inspectable by designing practice around the conditions that actually shape the target behavior. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Practice tasks are cleaner, slower, safer, more explicit, or more linear than the situations learners will actually face.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Practice tasks are cleaner, slower, safer, more explicit, or more linear than the situations learners will actually face.", "Authentic practice makes the transfer gap inspectable by designing practice around the conditions that actually shape the target behavior."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Practice-task realism is not necessarily an authoritative prescribed model bridged by tacit enacted work.", "slug": "procedure_work_mismatch"}], "normalized_requirement": "Practice tasks are cleaner, slower, safer, more explicit, or more linear than the situations learners will actually face.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Practice tasks are cleaner, slower, safer, more explicit, or more linear than the situations learners will actually face.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Preparation/deployment skew does not require prior teaching to emphasize delivery, explanation, or demonstration.", "slug": "training_serving_skew"}, {"falls_short_because": "The transfer relation does not require content-heavy prior training or insufficient representative practice.", "slug": "transfer_of_learning"}], "residual_id": "r:authentic_practice_environment:b005_a14_b005_a14_c5", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b005_a14_b005_a14_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Prior training has emphasized content delivery, explanation, or demonstration without enough representative practice. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Prior training has emphasized content delivery, explanation, or demonstration without enough representative practice."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Preparation/deployment skew does not require prior teaching to emphasize delivery, explanation, or demonstration.", "slug": "training_serving_skew"}, {"falls_short_because": "The transfer relation does not require content-heavy prior training or insufficient representative practice.", "slug": "transfer_of_learning"}], "normalized_requirement": "Prior training has emphasized content delivery, explanation, or demonstration without enough representative practice.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Prior training has emphasized content delivery, explanation, or demonstration without enough representative practice.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The training-task simplification causes a preparation-to-deployment performance gap rather than merely describing a different exercise format.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The training-task simplification causes a preparation-to-deployment performance gap rather than merely describing a different exercise format.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The target capability depends on cue recognition, adaptation, prioritization, coordination, judgment, or realistic sequencing rather than isolated recall.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Learners therefore master the exercise rather than the real capability. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The target capability depends on cue recognition, adaptation, prioritization, coordination, judgment, or realistic sequencing rather than isolated recall. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The target capability depends on cue recognition, adaptation, prioritization, coordination, judgment, or realistic sequencing rather than isolated recall.", "Learners therefore master the exercise rather than the real capability."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "The target capability depends on cue recognition, adaptation, prioritization, coordination, judgment, or realistic sequencing rather than isolated recall."}, {"display_text": "The cost of letting learners practice directly in the real setting is too high, but purely artificial practice is not credible preparation.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Learners therefore master the exercise rather than the real capability. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: The cost of letting learners practice directly in the real setting is too high, but purely artificial practice is not credible preparation. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The cost of letting learners practice directly in the real setting is too high, but purely artificial practice is not credible preparation.", "Learners therefore master the exercise rather than the real capability."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The cost of letting learners practice directly in the real setting is too high, but purely artificial practice is not credible preparation."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 5, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-backfill-batch-005", "ledger_sha256": "823445e5543375cf29a4850086257af6c6c07564f0b0b28fdad3ca263a3e819c"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Authority Legitimacy and Consent Foundations", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:authority_legitimacy_and_consent_foundations", "slug": "authority_legitimacy_and_consent_foundations"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 4, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 5, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 4 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is that decision power and accepted legitimacy can come apart. A person may have formal power but no credible mandate. An expert may have competence but no right to decide tradeoffs for affected parties. A committee may consult widely but lack accountability. A leader may inherit symbolic authority while drifting beyond the original scope.\n\nWhen this split persists, decisions are relitigated, compliance becomes coercive, and stakeholders treat the authority as arbitrary, captured, or illegible.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A role, institution, expert, leader, or forum can issue decisions, but affected parties do not have a stable reason to treat those decisions as binding, fair, or credible."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any listed literal drops at least one stated head obligation or the relation connecting them.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed source atom jointly entail the diagnostic head without importing a remedy or goal."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Authority requires recognized legitimate decision right, the opposite of a formally empowered actor whose mandate or fairness basis is unclear and resisted.", "slug": "authority"}, {"falls_short_because": "Legitimacy is standing acceptance of rightful authority, not resistance caused by an unclear legitimacy basis.", "slug": "legitimacy"}], "residual_id": "r:authority_legitimacy_and_consent_foundations:b005_a15_b005_a15_c2", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b005_a15_b005_a15_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A formally empowered actor faces resistance because the mandate, competence, or fairness basis is unclear. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A formally empowered actor faces resistance because the mandate, competence, or fairness basis is unclear."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Authority requires recognized legitimate decision right, the opposite of a formally empowered actor whose mandate or fairness basis is unclear and resisted.", "slug": "authority"}, {"falls_short_because": "Legitimacy is standing acceptance of rightful authority, not resistance caused by an unclear legitimacy basis.", "slug": "legitimacy"}], "normalized_requirement": "A formally empowered actor faces resistance because the mandate, competence, or fairness basis is unclear.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A formally empowered actor faces resistance because the mandate, competence, or fairness basis is unclear.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any listed literal drops at least one stated head obligation or the relation connecting them.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed source atom plus the explicit head residual jointly entail the diagnostic head without importing a remedy or goal."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Valid consent requires informed voluntary authorization and therefore has the opposite polarity from an uninformed or unheard affected party.", "slug": "consent"}, {"falls_short_because": "Due process requires notice, hearing, impartiality, and reasons; the condition states their absence or practical unavailability.", "slug": "procedural_fairness_due_process"}, {"falls_short_because": "Recognition justice supplies intelligibility and standing; it does not entail that affected parties were excluded from the process.", "slug": "recognition_justice"}], "residual_id": "r:authority_legitimacy_and_consent_foundations:b005_a15_b005_a15_c3", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b005_a15_b005_a15_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when a decision must bind people, resources, rights, norms, or shared infrastructure and affected parties need a stable reason to accept that decision. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A decision affects parties who were not represented, informed, heard, or able to challenge the process.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A decision affects parties who were not represented, informed, heard, or able to challenge the process.", "Use this archetype when a decision must bind people, resources, rights, norms, or shared infrastructure and affected parties need a stable reason to accept that decision."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Valid consent requires informed voluntary authorization and therefore has the opposite polarity from an uninformed or unheard affected party.", "slug": "consent"}, {"falls_short_because": "Due process requires notice, hearing, impartiality, and reasons; the condition states their absence or practical unavailability.", "slug": "procedural_fairness_due_process"}, {"falls_short_because": "Recognition justice supplies intelligibility and standing; it does not entail that affected parties were excluded from the process.", "slug": "recognition_justice"}], "normalized_requirement": "A decision affects parties who were not represented, informed, heard, or able to challenge the process.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A decision affects parties who were not represented, informed, heard, or able to challenge the process.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "Exclusion from representation, information, voice, or challenge removes a stable reason to accept the resulting decision as binding or fair.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Exclusion from representation, information, voice, or challenge removes a stable reason to accept the resulting decision as binding or fair.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any listed literal drops at least one stated head obligation or the relation connecting them.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed source atom jointly entail the diagnostic head without importing a remedy or goal."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Transparency, assignment, and consequence do not entail that accountability has been lost.", "slug": "accountability"}, {"falls_short_because": "Accepted authority does not entail erosion caused by scope drift or lost accountability.", "slug": "legitimacy"}], "residual_id": "r:authority_legitimacy_and_consent_foundations:b005_a15_b005_a15_c4", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b005_a15_b005_a15_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A leader may inherit symbolic authority while drifting beyond the original scope. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Existing legitimacy is eroding because authority has drifted beyond its original scope or has lost accountability.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Existing legitimacy is eroding because authority has drifted beyond its original scope or has lost accountability.", "A leader may inherit symbolic authority while drifting beyond the original scope."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Transparency, assignment, and consequence do not entail that accountability has been lost.", "slug": "accountability"}, {"falls_short_because": "Accepted authority does not entail erosion caused by scope drift or lost accountability.", "slug": "legitimacy"}], "normalized_requirement": "Existing legitimacy is eroding because authority has drifted beyond its original scope or has lost accountability.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Existing legitimacy is eroding because authority has drifted beyond its original scope or has lost accountability.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any listed literal drops at least one stated head obligation or the relation connecting them.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed source atom jointly entail the diagnostic head without importing a remedy or goal."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A recognized scope-bound decision right does not require multiple overlapping claimants or jurisdictional confusion.", "slug": "authority"}], "residual_id": "r:authority_legitimacy_and_consent_foundations:b005_a15_b005_a15_c5", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b005_a15_b005_a15_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "When this split persists, decisions are relitigated, compliance becomes coercive, and stakeholders treat the authority as arbitrary, captured, or illegible. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Multiple authorities claim overlapping jurisdiction and stakeholders do not know which one should bind them.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Multiple authorities claim overlapping jurisdiction and stakeholders do not know which one should bind them.", "When this split persists, decisions are relitigated, compliance becomes coercive, and stakeholders treat the authority as arbitrary, captured, or illegible."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A recognized scope-bound decision right does not require multiple overlapping claimants or jurisdictional confusion.", "slug": "authority"}], "normalized_requirement": "Multiple authorities claim overlapping jurisdiction and stakeholders do not know which one should bind them.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Multiple authorities claim overlapping jurisdiction and stakeholders do not know which one should bind them.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A new authority, role, institution, committee, standard, or decision forum is being created.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when a new decision forum is being created, an existing authority is contested, or a formerly informal authority must become institutionalized. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: A new authority, role, institution, committee, standard, or decision forum is being created. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A new authority, role, institution, committee, standard, or decision forum is being created.", "It is especially useful when a new decision forum is being created, an existing authority is contested, or a formerly informal authority must become institutionalized."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "A new authority, role, institution, committee, standard, or decision forum is being created."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 5, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-backfill-batch-005", "ledger_sha256": "823445e5543375cf29a4850086257af6c6c07564f0b0b28fdad3ca263a3e819c"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Authority-Mentor Relationship Anchoring", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:authority_mentor_relationship_anchoring", "slug": "authority_mentor_relationship_anchoring"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a transmission gap. A community has knowledge that lives in examples, stories, gestures, emotional tone, timing, exceptions, and situated judgment. Formal instruction can name the rule, but it often fails to show what the rule feels like in practice or why people should care.\n\nThe mentor relationship solves part of that gap by making culture personal and observable. The danger is that personal authority can also transmit bias, favoritism, dependency, and conformity. The design challenge is therefore to convert relational influence into accountable formation.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A group, profession, family, or community needs to transmit tacit cultural knowledge, values, judgment, and membership norms, but impersonal rules, lectures, documents, or compliance training do not create enough trust, motivation, or situated understanding for learners to internalize the culture responsibly."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P001-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require culturally situated tacit content, not merely any undocumented information.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The source role is tacit content constitutive of a culture.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail a failure or resistance of adequate formal documentary capture for the tacit content.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "That tacit cultural content resists adequate capture in formal documentation.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve both the cultural domain and formal-documentation target rather than a generic communication problem.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The representation medium is formal documentation and the represented material is cultural content.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "The culture's tacit standards, stories, emotional stance, or values resist adequate formal documentation.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "tacit cultural content resists adequate formal documentation", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P001-C04-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Internalized dispositions need not be culturally load-bearing or difficult to formalize.", "slug": "habitus"}, {"falls_short_because": "A relation-misstating representation need not concern tacit culture or documentation failure.", "slug": "representational_structure_mismatch"}, {"falls_short_because": "Prescribed and enacted work can diverge even when cultural standards are fully explicit.", "slug": "procedure_work_mismatch"}], "residual_id": "r:authority_mentor_relationship_anchoring:b006_a01_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b006_a01_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A culture depends on tacit standards, stories, emotional stance, or values that are hard to capture in formal documentation. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A culture depends on tacit standards, stories, emotional stance, or values that are hard to capture in formal documentation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Internalized dispositions need not be culturally load-bearing or difficult to formalize.", "slug": "habitus"}, {"falls_short_because": "A relation-misstating representation need not concern tacit culture or documentation failure.", "slug": "representational_structure_mismatch"}, {"falls_short_because": "Prescribed and enacted work can diverge even when cultural standards are fully explicit.", "slug": "procedure_work_mismatch"}], "normalized_requirement": "The culture's tacit standards, stories, emotional stance, or values resist adequate formal documentation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The culture's tacit standards, stories, emotional stance, or values resist adequate formal documentation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Recognized binding decision rights do not require dependency, coercion, or abuse risk.", "slug": "authority"}, {"falls_short_because": "Accepted vulnerability based on positive expectations does not require authority dependence or coercion risk.", "slug": "trust"}], "residual_id": "r:authority_mentor_relationship_anchoring:b006_a01_c6a", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b006_a01_c6a", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A high-stakes setting requires careful boundary design because authority and dependency could otherwise create coercion or abuse. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A high-stakes setting requires careful boundary design because authority and dependency could otherwise create coercion or abuse."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Recognized binding decision rights do not require dependency, coercion, or abuse risk.", "slug": "authority"}, {"falls_short_because": "Accepted vulnerability based on positive expectations does not require authority dependence or coercion risk.", "slug": "trust"}], "normalized_requirement": "Authority and dependency in high-stakes mentoring can create coercion or abuse.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Authority and dependency in high-stakes mentoring can create coercion or abuse.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "Impersonal instruction is insufficient and a trusted authority-bearing relationship is the missing transmission channel.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Impersonal instruction is insufficient and a trusted authority-bearing relationship is the missing transmission channel.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Novices need to learn not only explicit procedures but how respected insiders interpret ambiguous situations.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The pattern is especially strong when belonging, motivation, tacit judgment, and respect for a role model are central to learning. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: Novices need to learn not only explicit procedures but how respected insiders interpret ambiguous situations. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Novices need to learn not only explicit procedures but how respected insiders interpret ambiguous situations.", "The pattern is especially strong when belonging, motivation, tacit judgment, and respect for a role model are central to learning."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "Novices need to learn not only explicit procedures but how respected insiders interpret ambiguous situations."}, {"display_text": "Learners are more likely to internalize norms when they are tied to a trusted relationship and repeated participation.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A group, profession, family, or community needs to transmit tacit cultural knowledge, values, judgment, and membership norms, but impersonal rules, lectures, documents, or compliance training do not create enough trust, motivation, or situated understanding for learners to internalize the culture responsibly. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: Learners are more likely to internalize norms when they are tied to a trusted relationship and repeated participation. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Learners are more likely to internalize norms when they are tied to a trusted relationship and repeated participation.", "A group, profession, family, or community needs to transmit tacit cultural knowledge, values, judgment, and membership norms, but impersonal rules, lectures, documents, or compliance training do not create enough trust, motivation, or situated understanding for learners to internalize the culture responsibly."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Learners are more likely to internalize norms when they are tied to a trusted relationship and repeated participation."}, {"display_text": "A community wants continuity across generations, cohorts, or succession moments without relying only on rules or slogans.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A group, profession, family, or community needs to transmit tacit cultural knowledge, values, judgment, and membership norms, but impersonal rules, lectures, documents, or compliance training do not create enough trust, motivation, or situated understanding for learners to internalize the culture responsibly. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: A community wants continuity across generations, cohorts, or succession moments without relying only on rules or slogans. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A community wants continuity across generations, cohorts, or succession moments without relying only on rules or slogans.", "A group, profession, family, or community needs to transmit tacit cultural knowledge, values, judgment, and membership norms, but impersonal rules, lectures, documents, or compliance training do not create enough trust, motivation, or situated understanding for learners to internalize the culture responsibly."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "A community wants continuity across generations, cohorts, or succession moments without relying only on rules or slogans."}, {"display_text": "The learner needs both belonging and permission to question, adapt, and eventually exercise independent judgment.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It works best when mentor authority is legitimate, bounded, reviewable, and paired with the learner’s ability to ask questions, compare perspectives, and eventually act with independent judgment. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: The learner needs both belonging and permission to question, adapt, and eventually exercise independent judgment. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The learner needs both belonging and permission to question, adapt, and eventually exercise independent judgment.", "It works best when mentor authority is legitimate, bounded, reviewable, and paired with the learner’s ability to ask questions, compare perspectives, and eventually act with independent judgment."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The learner needs both belonging and permission to question, adapt, and eventually exercise independent judgment."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 6, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-006", "ledger_sha256": "74e72b23b127c01c1de2db886d4a7bcfc127e5e3acafeaa5a618314e3721e004"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Authority Rotation and Term Limitation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:authority_rotation_and_term_limitation", "slug": "authority_rotation_and_term_limitation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "An authority role gives one holder discretion, agenda access, information advantage, appointment influence, or veto power long enough that the holder can personalize the role, shape successors, suppress alternatives, or make the institution dependent on their continued control.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "An authority role gives one holder discretion, agenda access, information advantage, appointment influence, or veto power long enough that the holder can personalize the role, shape successors, suppress alternatives, or make the institution dependent on their continued control."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a recognized scope-bound right to issue binding decisions.", "role_mapping": "Authority holder -> role occupant; binding decision scope -> enumerated decision domain.", "slug": "authority", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime requires a persistent role carrying binding authority independently of its occupants.", "role_mapping": "Persistent authority-bearing role -> role subject to rotation.", "slug": "authority_handoff", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime requires a delegatee role with bounded power to decide, approve, execute, or allocate resources.", "role_mapping": "Delegatee role -> authority role; delegated scope -> meaningful decision domain.", "slug": "delegation_of_authority", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime requires pre-positioned decision authority inside an explicit scope.", "role_mapping": "Operational delegate -> role occupant; pre-positioned scope -> authority domain.", "slug": "authority_delegation_under_uncertainty", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b006_a02_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A role has meaningful decision, agenda-setting, approval, review, budget, disciplinary, interpretive, or representational authority. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A role has meaningful decision, agenda-setting, approval, review, budget, disciplinary, interpretive, or representational authority."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Authority", "one_liner": "The recognized, legitimate right to issue binding decisions within a defined scope, distinct from raw coercive force or mere persuasive influence.", "page_ref": "prime:authority", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Authority holder -> role occupant; binding decision scope -> enumerated decision domain.", "slug": "authority", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a recognized scope-bound right to issue binding decisions."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Authority Handoff", "one_liner": "A role with binding authority and attached state transfers between occupants without breaking either.", "page_ref": "prime:authority_handoff", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Persistent authority-bearing role -> role subject to rotation.", "slug": "authority_handoff", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a persistent role carrying binding authority independently of its occupants."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Delegation of Authority", "one_liner": "Assign responsibility.", "page_ref": "prime:delegation_of_authority", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Delegatee role -> authority role; delegated scope -> meaningful decision domain.", "slug": "delegation_of_authority", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a delegatee role with bounded power to decide, approve, execute, or allocate resources."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Authority Delegation Under Uncertainty", "one_liner": "Preposition decision authority at operational levels for contingencies.", "page_ref": "prime:authority_delegation_under_uncertainty", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Operational delegate -> role occupant; pre-positioned scope -> authority domain.", "slug": "authority_delegation_under_uncertainty", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires pre-positioned decision authority inside an explicit scope."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A persistent role carries meaningful decision, approval, resource, disciplinary, interpretive, or representational authority.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires an agent to sustain a problem so the valued role and its rewards persist.", "role_mapping": "Problem-dependent valued role -> authority role; role-capturing agent -> repeated or continuing holder.", "slug": "manufactured_dependency_for_role_capture", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b006_a02_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The same holder or faction can occupy the role repeatedly or indefinitely. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The same holder or faction can occupy the role repeatedly or indefinitely."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Manufactured Dependency for Role Capture", "one_liner": "An agent covertly sustains a problem to keep occupying the valued role attached to solving it.", "page_ref": "prime:manufactured_dependency_for_role_capture", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Problem-dependent valued role -> authority role; role-capturing agent -> repeated or continuing holder.", "slug": "manufactured_dependency_for_role_capture", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires an agent to sustain a problem so the valued role and its rewards persist."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The same holder or faction can occupy the authority role repeatedly or indefinitely.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Rigid thinking does not require tenure-derived informational or successor influence.", "slug": "cognitive_entrenchment"}, {"falls_short_because": "A durable role system need not give one long-tenured occupant superior influence.", "slug": "institution"}], "residual_id": "r:authority_rotation_and_term_limitation:b006_a02_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b006_a02_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Long tenure creates superior access to information, relationships, procedural knowledge, or successor influence. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Long tenure creates superior access to information, relationships, procedural knowledge, or successor influence."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Rigid thinking does not require tenure-derived informational or successor influence.", "slug": "cognitive_entrenchment"}, {"falls_short_because": "A durable role system need not give one long-tenured occupant superior influence.", "slug": "institution"}], "normalized_requirement": "Long tenure gives the holder superior access to information, relationships, procedural knowledge, or successor influence.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Long tenure gives the holder superior access to information, relationships, procedural knowledge, or successor influence.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires covert role capture whose acknowledgement would destroy the role's legitimacy.", "role_mapping": "Captured valued role -> authority role; destroyed cover legitimacy -> legitimacy damage from capture.", "slug": "manufactured_dependency_for_role_capture", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b006_a02_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The role is visible enough that entrenchment, favoritism, capture, or personal authority would undermine legitimacy. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The role is visible enough that entrenchment, favoritism, capture, or personal authority would undermine legitimacy."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Manufactured Dependency for Role Capture", "one_liner": "An agent covertly sustains a problem to keep occupying the valued role attached to solving it.", "page_ref": "prime:manufactured_dependency_for_role_capture", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Captured valued role -> authority role; destroyed cover legitimacy -> legitimacy damage from capture.", "slug": "manufactured_dependency_for_role_capture", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires covert role capture whose acknowledgement would destroy the role's legitimacy."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Entrenchment, favoritism, capture, or personalized authority in this role would undermine legitimacy.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Stakeholders need confidence that authority is role-dependent, reviewable, and not a private possession.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "An authority role gives one holder discretion, agenda access, information advantage, appointment influence, or veto power long enough that the holder can personalize the role, shape successors, suppress alternatives, or make the institution dependent on their continued control. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: Stakeholders need confidence that authority is role-dependent, reviewable, and not a private possession. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders need confidence that authority is role-dependent, reviewable, and not a private possession.", "An authority role gives one holder discretion, agenda access, information advantage, appointment influence, or veto power long enough that the holder can personalize the role, shape successors, suppress alternatives, or make the institution dependent on their continued control."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Stakeholders need confidence that authority is role-dependent, reviewable, and not a private possession."}, {"display_text": "A group wants renewal, plural participation, or power-sharing without abolishing the role itself.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Effective authority needs continuity, expertise, trust, and decisiveness, but unbounded continuity allows power to accumulate, personal authority to replace role authority, and informal control to survive formal accountability. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: A group wants renewal, plural participation, or power-sharing without abolishing the role itself. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A group wants renewal, plural participation, or power-sharing without abolishing the role itself.", "Effective authority needs continuity, expertise, trust, and decisiveness, but unbounded continuity allows power to accumulate, personal authority to replace role authority, and informal control to survive formal accountability."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "A group wants renewal, plural participation, or power-sharing without abolishing the role itself."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 6, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-006", "ledger_sha256": "74e72b23b127c01c1de2db886d4a7bcfc127e5e3acafeaa5a618314e3721e004"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Autonomous Action Zone Protection", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:autonomous_action_zone_protection", "slug": "autonomous_action_zone_protection"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "An actor is nominally sovereign, autonomous, delegated, or self-governing within a domain, but external authorities can still block, delay, pre-clear, redirect, demand notification, remove resources, or apply informal vetoes to ordinary in-scope action.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "An actor is nominally sovereign, autonomous, delegated, or self-governing within a domain, but external authorities can still block, delay, pre-clear, redirect, demand notification, remove resources, or apply informal vetoes to ordinary in-scope action."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a delegate to hold standing decision authority inside a pre-defined scope rather than seek case-by-case approval.", "role_mapping": "Delegate -> autonomous actor; delegation scope -> bounded domain.", "slug": "authority_delegation_under_uncertainty", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b006_a03_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A person, team, institution, community, or subsystem has a legitimate claim to decide within a bounded domain. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A person, team, institution, community, or subsystem has a legitimate claim to decide within a bounded domain."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Authority Delegation Under Uncertainty", "one_liner": "Preposition decision authority at operational levels for contingencies.", "page_ref": "prime:authority_delegation_under_uncertainty", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Delegate -> autonomous actor; delegation scope -> bounded domain.", "slug": "authority_delegation_under_uncertainty", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a delegate to hold standing decision authority inside a pre-defined scope rather than seek case-by-case approval."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "An actor has a recognized, bounded claim to decide inside a domain.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Externally fixing a variable does not require adjacent authority interests or interference with a legitimate action domain.", "slug": "intervention"}, {"falls_short_because": "Restricting access does not require an outside actor interfering with another actor's legitimate in-scope decisions.", "slug": "access_control"}, {"falls_short_because": "Borrowed privilege through an intermediary does not require the oversight or resource-leverage relation stated here.", "slug": "confused_deputy"}], "residual_id": "r:autonomous_action_zone_protection:b006_a03_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b006_a03_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: External actors have adjacent interests, oversight responsibilities, resources, or infrastructure that can be used to interfere with in-scope action. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["External actors have adjacent interests, oversight responsibilities, resources, or infrastructure that can be used to interfere with in-scope action."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Externally fixing a variable does not require adjacent authority interests or interference with a legitimate action domain.", "slug": "intervention"}, {"falls_short_because": "Restricting access does not require an outside actor interfering with another actor's legitimate in-scope decisions.", "slug": "access_control"}, {"falls_short_because": "Borrowed privilege through an intermediary does not require the oversight or resource-leverage relation stated here.", "slug": "confused_deputy"}], "normalized_requirement": "External actors have adjacent authority, resources, or infrastructure that can interfere with the actor's in-scope action.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "External actors have adjacent authority, resources, or infrastructure that can interfere with the actor's in-scope action.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires otherwise-ready action to remain blocked until an external authority emits affirmative authorization.", "role_mapping": "Ready flow -> in-scope action; external release authority -> sponsor or center; release token -> approval/sign-off.", "slug": "permission_gated_hold", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b006_a03_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Prior permission, routine notification, sponsor approval, central sign-off, or informal consultation has become a de facto requirement. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Prior permission, routine notification, sponsor approval, central sign-off, or informal consultation has become a de facto requirement."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Permission-Gated Hold", "one_liner": "An otherwise ready flow remains blocked until an external authority emits a required authorization, making completion depend on administrative release rather than on the flow's own movement or production capacity.", "page_ref": "prime:permission_gated_hold", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Ready flow -> in-scope action; external release authority -> sponsor or center; release token -> approval/sign-off.", "slug": "permission_gated_hold", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires otherwise-ready action to remain blocked until an external authority emits affirmative authorization."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Prior permission, routine notification, sponsor approval, central sign-off, or informal consultation is a de facto prerequisite for otherwise in-scope action.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A tiered escalation design can have a clear boundary and therefore does not require ambiguity or exploitability.", "slug": "local_autonomy_tiered_escalation"}, {"falls_short_because": "Central intent with decentralized execution does not require an unclear intervention boundary.", "slug": "mission_command"}], "residual_id": "r:autonomous_action_zone_protection:b006_a03_c5", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_AMBIGUITY", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b006_a03_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The boundary between ordinary in-scope action and legitimate external intervention is unclear or easy to exploit. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The boundary between ordinary in-scope action and legitimate external intervention is unclear or easy to exploit."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A tiered escalation design can have a clear boundary and therefore does not require ambiguity or exploitability.", "slug": "local_autonomy_tiered_escalation"}, {"falls_short_because": "Central intent with decentralized execution does not require an unclear intervention boundary.", "slug": "mission_command"}], "normalized_requirement": "The boundary between ordinary in-scope action and legitimate external intervention is unclear or exploitable.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_AMBIGUITY", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The boundary between ordinary in-scope action and legitimate external intervention is unclear or exploitable.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An authorization hold does not by itself establish that the held actor has a legitimate autonomy claim that the hold negates.", "slug": "permission_gated_hold"}, {"falls_short_because": "Self-governed action does not require an external preclearance gate.", "slug": "autonomy"}], "residual_id": "r:autonomous_action_zone_protection:b006_a03_c6a", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b006_a03_c6a", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Stakeholders need both autonomy and accountability, but preclearance would destroy the autonomy the system claims to protect. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders need both autonomy and accountability, but preclearance would destroy the autonomy the system claims to protect."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An authorization hold does not by itself establish that the held actor has a legitimate autonomy claim that the hold negates.", "slug": "permission_gated_hold"}, {"falls_short_because": "Self-governed action does not require an external preclearance gate.", "slug": "autonomy"}], "normalized_requirement": "Requiring preclearance would negate the autonomy the system claims to grant.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Requiring preclearance would negate the autonomy the system claims to grant.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Action must be taken quickly, independently, confidentially, or authentically for the domain to function.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "An actor is nominally sovereign, autonomous, delegated, or self-governing within a domain, but external authorities can still block, delay, pre-clear, redirect, demand notification, remove resources, or apply informal vetoes to ordinary in-scope action. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: Action must be taken quickly, independently, confidentially, or authentically for the domain to function. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Action must be taken quickly, independently, confidentially, or authentically for the domain to function.", "An actor is nominally sovereign, autonomous, delegated, or self-governing within a domain, but external authorities can still block, delay, pre-clear, redirect, demand notification, remove resources, or apply informal vetoes to ordinary in-scope action."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Action must be taken quickly, independently, confidentially, or authentically for the domain to function."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 6, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-006", "ledger_sha256": "74e72b23b127c01c1de2db886d4a7bcfc127e5e3acafeaa5a618314e3721e004"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Autonomy-Supportive Constraint Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:autonomy_supportive_constraint_design", "slug": "autonomy_supportive_constraint_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a mismatch between a necessary boundary and the way that boundary is experienced. The system needs a constraint, but the affected people experience it as domination. That experience can produce reactance: backlash, symbolic refusal, covert noncompliance, shadow workflows, distrust, delay, or identity-based defense of discretion.\n\nThis problem often appears after sudden mandates, unexplained defaults, opaque enforcement, one-size-fits-all policies, narrow compliance paths, or “because we said so” communication. The resistance may look irrational from the designer’s perspective, but from the affected actor’s perspective the rule may signal distrust, loss of status, lack of voice, or arbitrary authority.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A rule, restriction, change, default, mandate, or compliance requirement is necessary or partly justified, but affected actors resist because the constraint feels arbitrary, controlling, imposed, disrespectful, or freedom-erasing."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires an external threat to a perceived, valued freedom or choice.", "role_mapping": "Perceived freedom -> valued choice; threat-to-freedom event -> removing constraint.", "slug": "reactance", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b006_a04_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A constraint removes or appears to remove a choice that people care about. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A constraint removes or appears to remove a choice that people care about."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Reactance", "one_liner": "Resistance to constraints.", "page_ref": "prime:reactance", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Perceived freedom -> valued choice; threat-to-freedom event -> removing constraint.", "slug": "reactance", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires an external threat to a perceived, valued freedom or choice."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A constraint removes or appears to remove a choice the affected actor values.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A constraint can have a fully explicit, consistent rationale.", "slug": "constraint"}, {"falls_short_because": "A chosen problem encoding need not concern the transparency or legitimacy of a constraint rationale.", "slug": "problem_representation"}], "residual_id": "r:autonomy_supportive_constraint_design:b006_a04_c2", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_AMBIGUITY", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b006_a04_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The reason for the constraint is opaque, generic, inconsistent, or not connected to a protected value. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The reason for the constraint is opaque, generic, inconsistent, or not connected to a protected value."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A constraint can have a fully explicit, consistent rationale.", "slug": "constraint"}, {"falls_short_because": "A chosen problem encoding need not concern the transparency or legitimacy of a constraint rationale.", "slug": "problem_representation"}], "normalized_requirement": "The constraint's reason is opaque, generic, inconsistent, or disconnected from a protected value.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_AMBIGUITY", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The constraint's reason is opaque, generic, inconsistent, or disconnected from a protected value.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires continuing external pressure on a target until it performs a demanded action.", "role_mapping": "Continuing coercive pressure -> command or unilateral control; target -> affected actor.", "slug": "compellence", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b006_a04_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The constraint is communicated as command, pressure, guilt, surveillance, or unilateral control. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The constraint is communicated as command, pressure, guilt, surveillance, or unilateral control."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Compellence", "one_liner": "Imposing ongoing costs to force a positive action and keeping them live until compliance — the action-demanding counterpart to deterrence, structurally harder because compliance is publicly visible and deadline-bound.", "page_ref": "prime:compellence", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Continuing coercive pressure -> command or unilateral control; target -> affected actor.", "slug": "compellence", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires continuing external pressure on a target until it performs a demanded action."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The constraint is imposed through command, pressure, guilt, surveillance, or unilateral control.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P001-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must map the channel recipients to affected actors, not to administrators or unrelated observers.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The principal beneficiaries or users of the channels are actors affected by the arrangement.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern channels that let affected actors influence, contest, navigate, or adapt the arrangement.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The missing objects are actor-facing channels for input, recourse, choice, or local adaptation.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail absence of the interface for affected actors, not the presence of a functioning channel.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Affected actors lack the relevant channel interface.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve discoverable visibility to affected actors; a hidden or purely internal mechanism does not satisfy this obligation.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The absent provision is specifically an actor-visible channel interface.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Affected actors lack visible input, appeal, exception, timing, pathway, or local-adaptation channels.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "affected actors lack visible agency channels", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P001-C05-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Missing a home constraint in a recipient context is not absence of participation and appeal channels.", "slug": "release_from_controlling_context"}, {"falls_short_because": "A functioning tiered-escalation design supplies local channels rather than requiring their absence.", "slug": "local_autonomy_tiered_escalation"}], "residual_id": "r:autonomy_supportive_constraint_design:b006_a04_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b006_a04_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Affected actors have no visible input, appeal, exception, timing, pathway, or local adaptation channel. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Affected actors have no visible input, appeal, exception, timing, pathway, or local adaptation channel."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Missing a home constraint in a recipient context is not absence of participation and appeal channels.", "slug": "release_from_controlling_context"}, {"falls_short_because": "A functioning tiered-escalation design supplies local channels rather than requiring their absence.", "slug": "local_autonomy_tiered_escalation"}], "normalized_requirement": "Affected actors lack visible input, appeal, exception, timing, pathway, or local-adaptation channels.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Affected actors lack visible input, appeal, exception, timing, pathway, or local-adaptation channels.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a freedom-restoration motivation and boomerang, defiance, or autonomy-assertion response after a constraint threat.", "role_mapping": "Constraint rollout -> threat event; boomerang/defiance -> backlash, workaround, or symbolic noncompliance.", "slug": "reactance", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b006_a04_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Backlash, covert workarounds, symbolic noncompliance, or disengagement increase after rollout. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Backlash, covert workarounds, symbolic noncompliance, or disengagement increase after rollout."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Reactance", "one_liner": "Resistance to constraints.", "page_ref": "prime:reactance", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Constraint rollout -> threat event; boomerang/defiance -> backlash, workaround, or symbolic noncompliance.", "slug": "reactance", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a freedom-restoration motivation and boomerang, defiance, or autonomy-assertion response after a constraint threat."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Freedom-restoration responses increase after rollout as backlash, workaround, symbolic noncompliance, or disengagement.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The constraint is necessary or partly justified, so removal is not already the appropriate remedy.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The constraint is necessary or partly justified, so removal is not already the appropriate remedy.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 6, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-006", "ledger_sha256": "74e72b23b127c01c1de2db886d4a7bcfc127e5e3acafeaa5a618314e3721e004"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Autopoietic Self-Maintenance", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:autopoietic_self_maintenance", "slug": "autopoietic_self_maintenance"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 5 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is that the system’s operating identity depends on components that are not automatically renewed. The visible structure may persist while the living basis of the structure decays. A formal organization may still have roles on paper while no one knows how to perform them. A software project may still have users while maintainer capacity collapses. A community may still meet while trust and norms erode. An ecosystem may still produce yield while soil, water, or biodiversity are being depleted.\n\nThis creates a continuity paradox. The system needs enough stability to remain itself, but enough renewal and adaptation to avoid becoming brittle, hollow, or extractive. Self-maintenance solves this by making reproduction explicit: what must be regenerated, by what loop, at what rate, through which boundary, and with what feedback.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system’s identity or function depends on components that degrade, exit, are consumed, become obsolete, or require continual reproduction over time."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A self-producing system need not currently lose essential components faster than it renews them.", "slug": "autopoiesis"}, {"falls_short_because": "Diminishing system properties do not require essential identity-bearing loss to exceed renewal.", "slug": "temporal_decay_and_degradation"}, {"falls_short_because": "Continuous replacement can preserve structure and therefore need not involve loss exceeding renewal.", "slug": "turnover"}], "residual_id": "r:autopoietic_self_maintenance:b006_a05_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b006_a05_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The system repeatedly loses essential people, roles, skills, norms, resources, infrastructure, legitimacy, trust, or memory faster than it can renew them. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The system repeatedly loses essential people, roles, skills, norms, resources, infrastructure, legitimacy, trust, or memory faster than it can renew them."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A self-producing system need not currently lose essential components faster than it renews them.", "slug": "autopoiesis"}, {"falls_short_because": "Diminishing system properties do not require essential identity-bearing loss to exceed renewal.", "slug": "temporal_decay_and_degradation"}, {"falls_short_because": "Continuous replacement can preserve structure and therefore need not involve loss exceeding renewal.", "slug": "turnover"}], "normalized_requirement": "Essential identity-bearing people, roles, skills, norms, resources, infrastructure, legitimacy, trust, or memory are lost faster than renewed.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Essential identity-bearing people, roles, skills, norms, resources, infrastructure, legitimacy, trust, or memory are lost faster than renewed.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Self-production does not require current output to consume future productive capacity.", "slug": "autopoiesis"}, {"falls_short_because": "Mechanism atrophy from easy external inflow does not require the system's own production to consume its capacity.", "slug": "unearned_windfall_mechanism_atrophy"}, {"falls_short_because": "An excessive enabling input can degrade capacity without value production consuming its own enabling base.", "slug": "overshoot_and_collapse"}], "residual_id": "r:autopoietic_self_maintenance:b006_a05_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b006_a05_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The system produces value but consumes the capacities that make future production possible. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The system produces value but consumes the capacities that make future production possible."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Self-production does not require current output to consume future productive capacity.", "slug": "autopoiesis"}, {"falls_short_because": "Mechanism atrophy from easy external inflow does not require the system's own production to consume its capacity.", "slug": "unearned_windfall_mechanism_atrophy"}, {"falls_short_because": "An excessive enabling input can degrade capacity without value production consuming its own enabling base.", "slug": "overshoot_and_collapse"}], "normalized_requirement": "Current value production consumes the capacities required for future production.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Current value production consumes the capacities required for future production.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P001-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern ongoing continuity, not merely current performance or one-time task completion.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The dependent outcome is continuity of the relevant system, practice, or function.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require stewards whose contribution is necessary to continuity, not incidental participants.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The depended-on role is a load-bearing steward role.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail the directed dependence from continuity to steward contribution.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Continuity depends on the contribution of those load-bearing stewards.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must attach succession or replacement capacity to the same load-bearing steward role.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The qualified object is the pathway for replacing the load-bearing stewards.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must entail inadequate or fragile replacement capacity for the stewards.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The steward replacement pathway exists but is weak.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must entail that no replacement or succession pathway exists for the stewards.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The steward replacement pathway is absent.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Continuity depends on load-bearing stewards whose replacement pathway is weak or absent.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "continuity depends on stewards without a robust replacement pathway", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P001-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A covertly problem-sustaining role is not required for ordinary succession fragility.", "slug": "manufactured_dependency_for_role_capture"}, {"falls_short_because": "Flexible movement among roles does not require a weak or absent replacement path for a load-bearing steward.", "slug": "role_fluidity"}], "residual_id": "r:autopoietic_self_maintenance:b006_a05_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b006_a05_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Continuity depends on founders, maintainers, elders, experts, operators, or informal stewards whose replacement path is weak or absent. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Continuity depends on founders, maintainers, elders, experts, operators, or informal stewards whose replacement path is weak or absent."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_GUARDED_EQUIVALENT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A bus-factor instance above one preserves the DSA while a substitute remains available, falsifying the absent-path branch; the count-equals-one guard excludes exactly that counterexample.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Bus Factor", "one_liner": "The minimum number of team members whose sudden simultaneous loss would halt a project — a per-capability count of how many people could take a subsystem, credential, or relationship over tomorrow, exposing where tacit human knowledge is dangerously concentrated.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:bus_factor", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O6"], "guard_type": "THRESHOLD_CROSSING", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "bus_factor_count_equals_one", "predicate": "The relevant steward capability has a bus-factor count equal to one.", "rationale": "The guard is atomic, candidate-anchored, and minimally selects the exact count-one state; after it is added, no bus-factor instance can retain a substitute while satisfying the qualifier."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "bus_factor"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "bus_factor_count_equals_one"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "bus_factor", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P001-C06-U1", "why_it_fits": "Both readers retained the same count-one expression. Their normalized keys differ only lexically; exact review confirms that one candidate-anchored scalar equality fills O6 and completes the absent-replacement DNF branch without adding another role or relation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Continuity depends on load-bearing stewards whose replacement pathway is weak or absent.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Persistence criteria can remain stable and do not require closure-openness drift.", "slug": "identity_providing_kind"}, {"falls_short_because": "A durable self-reproducing role complex does not require its membership criteria to drift toward either failure pole.", "slug": "institution"}], "residual_id": "r:autopoietic_self_maintenance:b006_a05_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b006_a05_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The system’s boundary, membership, standards, or identity criteria are drifting so that renewal either becomes too closed and stagnant or too open and incoherent. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The system’s boundary, membership, standards, or identity criteria are drifting so that renewal either becomes too closed and stagnant or too open and incoherent."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Persistence criteria can remain stable and do not require closure-openness drift.", "slug": "identity_providing_kind"}, {"falls_short_because": "A durable self-reproducing role complex does not require its membership criteria to drift toward either failure pole.", "slug": "institution"}], "normalized_requirement": "Boundary, membership, standard, or identity criteria drift toward stagnating closure or incoherent openness.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Boundary, membership, standard, or identity criteria drift toward stagnating closure or incoherent openness.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Preventive maintenance acts continuously ahead of failure and therefore has the opposite response structure.", "slug": "maintenance"}, {"falls_short_because": "Systematic decay does not require an episodic-repair organizational response.", "slug": "temporal_decay_and_degradation"}, {"falls_short_because": "Accumulating sub-threshold damage does not require maintenance to be episodic.", "slug": "gradual_deterioration"}], "residual_id": "r:autopoietic_self_maintenance:b006_a05_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b006_a05_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Maintenance is treated as episodic repair even though degradation is continuous, structural, and predictable. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Maintenance is treated as episodic repair even though degradation is continuous, structural, and predictable."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Preventive maintenance acts continuously ahead of failure and therefore has the opposite response structure.", "slug": "maintenance"}, {"falls_short_because": "Systematic decay does not require an episodic-repair organizational response.", "slug": "temporal_decay_and_degradation"}, {"falls_short_because": "Accumulating sub-threshold damage does not require maintenance to be episodic.", "slug": "gradual_deterioration"}], "normalized_requirement": "Continuous, structural, predictable degradation is treated as episodic repair.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Continuous, structural, predictable degradation is treated as episodic repair.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The system needs to persist across generations, turnover, shocks, scaling, ecological cycles, or repeated use without losing its organizing logic.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: The system needs to persist across generations, turnover, shocks, scaling, ecological cycles, or repeated use without losing its organizing logic. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The system needs to persist across generations, turnover, shocks, scaling, ecological cycles, or repeated use without losing its organizing logic."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The system needs to persist across generations, turnover, shocks, scaling, ecological cycles, or repeated use without losing its organizing logic."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 6, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-006", "ledger_sha256": "74e72b23b127c01c1de2db886d4a7bcfc127e5e3acafeaa5a618314e3721e004"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Awe/Scale Experience Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:awe_scale_experience_design", "slug": "awe_scale_experience_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 2 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 2}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is that the subject’s magnitude is real, but the audience cannot perceive it at the right scale. The event feels too small, the risk feels too distant, the data feels abstract, the ceremony feels procedural, or the environment fails to communicate gravity.\n\nA second version of the problem is overcorrection: intensity is added, but it overwhelms or manipulates people without producing meaning. The design becomes spectacle. The audience remembers the reveal, sound, height, or scale effect, but not the responsibility, understanding, or commitment it was meant to support.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A message, place, ceremony, exhibit, visualization, or learning experience fails to convey magnitude, gravity, reverence, humility, or transformative attention; or it uses intensity in ways that overwhelm people without helping them understand what the intensity means."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a temporal frame millions to billions of times beyond ordinary life and civilization scales.", "role_mapping": "Deep temporal frame -> subject's deep-time disjunct.", "slug": "deep_time", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime requires a collectively set-apart, inviolable status that demands reverence.", "role_mapping": "Set-apart inviolable object/value -> sacredness disjunct.", "slug": "sacred", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b006_a06_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The subject involves vast scale, deep time, collective loss, ecological consequence, institutional gravity, sacredness, technical magnitude, or a transition that ordinary presentation makes feel flat. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The subject involves vast scale, deep time, collective loss, ecological consequence, institutional gravity, sacredness, technical magnitude, or a transition that ordinary presentation makes feel flat."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Deep Time", "one_liner": "Extremely long timescales.", "page_ref": "prime:deep_time", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Deep temporal frame -> subject's deep-time disjunct.", "slug": "deep_time", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a temporal frame millions to billions of times beyond ordinary life and civilization scales."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Sacred", "one_liner": "Things set apart as inviolable and demanding reverence.", "page_ref": "prime:sacred", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Set-apart inviolable object/value -> sacredness disjunct.", "slug": "sacred", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a collectively set-apart, inviolable status that demands reverence."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The subject involves vast scale, deep time, collective gravity, sacredness, technical magnitude, or another extraordinary significance-bearing magnitude.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Wide-range logarithmic encoding does not require an explicit accurate representation to fail perceptually.", "slug": "logarithmic_perception_and_encoding"}, {"falls_short_because": "Medium choice shapes expression but does not require accurate symbols to flatten perceived scale.", "slug": "representational_modality"}, {"falls_short_because": "Size-dependent behavior does not require a representation-perception gap.", "slug": "scale"}], "residual_id": "r:awe_scale_experience_design:b006_a06_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b006_a06_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Numbers, labels, symbols, or explanations are accurate but do not make scale or gravity perceptible. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Numbers, labels, symbols, or explanations are accurate but do not make scale or gravity perceptible."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Wide-range logarithmic encoding does not require an explicit accurate representation to fail perceptually.", "slug": "logarithmic_perception_and_encoding"}, {"falls_short_because": "Medium choice shapes expression but does not require accurate symbols to flatten perceived scale.", "slug": "representational_modality"}, {"falls_short_because": "Size-dependent behavior does not require a representation-perception gap.", "slug": "scale"}], "normalized_requirement": "Accurate numbers, labels, symbols, or explanations fail to make the subject's scale or gravity perceptible.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Accurate numbers, labels, symbols, or explanations fail to make the subject's scale or gravity perceptible.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The desired outcome is not merely noticing something but experiencing its significance strongly enough to reframe attention, judgment, commitment, or memory.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The intervention must make significance felt strongly enough to change perception while preserving autonomy, safety, truthfulness, accessibility, and meaning. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: The desired outcome is not merely noticing something but experiencing its significance strongly enough to reframe attention, judgment, commitment, or memory. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The desired outcome is not merely noticing something but experiencing its significance strongly enough to reframe attention, judgment, commitment, or memory.", "The intervention must make significance felt strongly enough to change perception while preserving autonomy, safety, truthfulness, accessibility, and meaning."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "The desired outcome is not merely noticing something but experiencing its significance strongly enough to reframe attention, judgment, commitment, or memory."}, {"display_text": "Awe, reverence, humility, fascination, or seriousness can be evoked ethically, with attention to consent, accessibility, and safe distance.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A message, place, ceremony, exhibit, visualization, or learning experience fails to convey magnitude, gravity, reverence, humility, or transformative attention; or it uses intensity in ways that overwhelm people without helping them understand what the intensity means. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: Awe, reverence, humility, fascination, or seriousness can be evoked ethically, with attention to consent, accessibility, and safe distance. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Awe, reverence, humility, fascination, or seriousness can be evoked ethically, with attention to consent, accessibility, and safe distance.", "A message, place, ceremony, exhibit, visualization, or learning experience fails to convey magnitude, gravity, reverence, humility, or transformative attention; or it uses intensity in ways that overwhelm people without helping them understand what the intensity means."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Awe, reverence, humility, fascination, or seriousness can be evoked ethically, with attention to consent, accessibility, and safe distance."}, {"display_text": "The audience needs a way to integrate the response into interpretation, reflection, or action rather than simply being impressed.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: The audience needs a way to integrate the response into interpretation, reflection, or action rather than simply being impressed. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The audience needs a way to integrate the response into interpretation, reflection, or action rather than simply being impressed."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The audience needs a way to integrate the response into interpretation, reflection, or action rather than simply being impressed."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 6, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-006", "ledger_sha256": "74e72b23b127c01c1de2db886d4a7bcfc127e5e3acafeaa5a618314e3721e004"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Backcasting Pathway Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:backcasting_pathway_design", "slug": "backcasting_pathway_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 4 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is present-trajectory lock-in. A desired future may be widely endorsed, but forward extrapolation starts from current budgets, roles, infrastructure, incentives, and habits. The result is a plan that appears practical while never revealing what the desired future actually requires.\n\nBackcasting addresses the gap between aspiration and pathway. It exposes the enabling conditions that have to exist before the desired endpoint can become real. Without this reverse logic, the organization may discover too late that a necessary capability, regulatory change, trust condition, technical dependency, or resource commitment should have been started much earlier.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A desired future is clear enough to guide action, but forward extrapolation from the current state does not reveal a credible path because present assumptions, routines, incentives, or constraints reproduce the current trajectory."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Working backward from a future is the solution procedure and does not require business-as-usual to be incapable of reaching it.", "slug": "backcasting"}, {"falls_short_because": "A path-locking high-sensitivity moment need not involve a preferred endpoint unreachable by extrapolation.", "slug": "critical_juncture"}], "residual_id": "r:backcasting_pathway_design:b006_a07_c1b", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_AMBIGUITY", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b006_a07_c1b", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A future state is normatively or strategically preferred but not reachable through business-as-usual extrapolation. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A future state is normatively or strategically preferred but not reachable through business-as-usual extrapolation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Working backward from a future is the solution procedure and does not require business-as-usual to be incapable of reaching it.", "slug": "backcasting"}, {"falls_short_because": "A path-locking high-sensitivity moment need not involve a preferred endpoint unreachable by extrapolation.", "slug": "critical_juncture"}], "normalized_requirement": "Business-as-usual extrapolation cannot reach the preferred future state.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_AMBIGUITY", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Business-as-usual extrapolation cannot reach the preferred future state.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a target complex working system to be reachable only through an ordered chain of viable predecessor systems.", "role_mapping": "Target complex system -> preferred endpoint; viable intermediates -> prerequisites.", "slug": "galls_law", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b006_a07_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The endpoint implies prerequisites that must exist before the endpoint can be realized. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The endpoint implies prerequisites that must exist before the endpoint can be realized."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Gall's Law", "one_liner": "A complex working system is reached only through a connected chain of simpler systems that each worked, never by from-scratch design of the whole.", "page_ref": "prime:galls_law", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Target complex system -> preferred endpoint; viable intermediates -> prerequisites.", "slug": "galls_law", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a target complex working system to be reachable only through an ordered chain of viable predecessor systems."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The endpoint requires a sequence of predecessor capabilities or states that must work before it can be realized.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Interpreting ambiguity does not require agreement on an endpoint combined with pathway disagreement.", "slug": "sensemaking"}, {"falls_short_because": "Standardizing local reality for distant control does not require a vague pathway to an agreed future.", "slug": "legibility"}], "residual_id": "r:backcasting_pathway_design:b006_a07_c3b", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_AMBIGUITY", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b006_a07_c3b", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Actors agree broadly on where they want to be but disagree or remain vague about the pathway. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Actors agree broadly on where they want to be but disagree or remain vague about the pathway."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Interpreting ambiguity does not require agreement on an endpoint combined with pathway disagreement.", "slug": "sensemaking"}, {"falls_short_because": "Standardizing local reality for distant control does not require a vague pathway to an agreed future.", "slug": "legibility"}], "normalized_requirement": "Actors disagree or remain vague about the pathway to the endpoint.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_AMBIGUITY", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Actors disagree or remain vague about the pathway to the endpoint.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An ordered route need not cross heterogeneous prerequisite classes or dependency constraints.", "slug": "path"}, {"falls_short_because": "Relational whole-system analysis does not require a future pathway with the enumerated dependencies.", "slug": "systems_thinking"}], "residual_id": "r:backcasting_pathway_design:b006_a07_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b006_a07_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The path crosses capability, legitimacy, infrastructure, policy, behavior, or resource dependencies. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The path crosses capability, legitimacy, infrastructure, policy, behavior, or resource dependencies."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An ordered route need not cross heterogeneous prerequisite classes or dependency constraints.", "slug": "path"}, {"falls_short_because": "Relational whole-system analysis does not require a future pathway with the enumerated dependencies.", "slug": "systems_thinking"}], "normalized_requirement": "The pathway crosses interdependent capability, legitimacy, infrastructure, policy, behavior, or resource prerequisites.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The pathway crosses interdependent capability, legitimacy, infrastructure, policy, behavior, or resource prerequisites.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The future endpoint is time-bound, high-stakes, or hard to reverse.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is weaker when the endpoint is vague, when the main problem is choosing among multiple possible futures, or when ordinary task scheduling is already enough. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: The future endpoint is time-bound, high-stakes, or hard to reverse. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The future endpoint is time-bound, high-stakes, or hard to reverse.", "It is weaker when the endpoint is vague, when the main problem is choosing among multiple possible futures, or when ordinary task scheduling is already enough."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The future endpoint is time-bound, high-stakes, or hard to reverse."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 6, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-006", "ledger_sha256": "74e72b23b127c01c1de2db886d4a7bcfc127e5e3acafeaa5a618314e3721e004"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Backfire-Aware Suppression Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:backfire_aware_suppression_design", "slug": "backfire_aware_suppression_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 5, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "An actor wants to reduce exposure to information, a claim, an image, a leak, a rumor, an error, a harmful behavior cue, or a prohibited object. The available response is itself visible to an audience. Because visible suppression can imply importance, embarrassment, power conflict, taboo, scarcity, or hidden truth, the response increases alertness and sharing rather than reducing exposure.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "An actor wants to reduce exposure to information, a claim, an image, a leak, a rumor, an error, a harmful behavior cue, or a prohibited object. The available response is itself visible to an audience. Because visible suppression can imply importance, embarrassment, power conflict, taboo, scarcity, or hidden truth, the response increases alertness and sharing rather than reducing exposure."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires the suppression act itself to be observable to the audience.", "role_mapping": "Visible suppression act -> visible or discoverable control act.", "slug": "streisand_effect", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b006_a08_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The control act will be visible or discoverable. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The control act will be visible or discoverable"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Streisand Effect", "one_liner": "A visible attempt to suppress information becomes a high-salience signal that amplifies it, when the suppression act is itself observable to the audience.", "page_ref": "prime:streisand_effect", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Visible suppression act -> visible or discoverable control act.", "slug": "streisand_effect", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires the suppression act itself to be observable to the audience."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The information-control act is visible or discoverable.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires an audience inference that suppression signals noteworthiness.", "role_mapping": "Audience inference -> suppression-as-significance evidence.", "slug": "streisand_effect", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b006_a08_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The audience can treat suppression as evidence of significance. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The audience can treat suppression as evidence of significance"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Streisand Effect", "one_liner": "A visible attempt to suppress information becomes a high-salience signal that amplifies it, when the suppression act is itself observable to the audience.", "page_ref": "prime:streisand_effect", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Audience inference -> suppression-as-significance evidence.", "slug": "streisand_effect", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires an audience inference that suppression signals noteworthiness."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The audience can treat suppression as evidence that the information is significant.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires copying capacity that propagates the item faster than suppression can pursue it.", "role_mapping": "Copying capacity -> replication channels.", "slug": "streisand_effect", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b006_a08_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Replication channels exist. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Replication channels exist"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Streisand Effect", "one_liner": "A visible attempt to suppress information becomes a high-salience signal that amplifies it, when the suppression act is itself observable to the audience.", "page_ref": "prime:streisand_effect", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Copying capacity -> replication channels.", "slug": "streisand_effect", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires copying capacity that propagates the item faster than suppression can pursue it."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The audience has channels capable of replicating, mirroring, or forwarding the information.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Accepted authority does not require its trust basis to be fragile.", "slug": "legitimacy"}, {"falls_short_because": "A functioning due-process relation does not require fragile trust or legitimacy.", "slug": "procedural_fairness_due_process"}], "residual_id": "r:backfire_aware_suppression_design:b006_a08_c4", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b006_a08_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Trust or legitimacy is fragile. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Trust or legitimacy is fragile"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Accepted authority does not require its trust basis to be fragile.", "slug": "legitimacy"}, {"falls_short_because": "A functioning due-process relation does not require fragile trust or legitimacy.", "slug": "procedural_fairness_due_process"}], "normalized_requirement": "Trust or legitimacy surrounding the control act is fragile.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Trust or legitimacy surrounding the control act is fragile.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires net amplification as the visible act creates a second-order audience and salience signal.", "role_mapping": "Net amplification -> increased interest after targeting.", "slug": "streisand_effect", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b006_a08_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The original information is more interesting after being targeted. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The original information is more interesting after being targeted"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Streisand Effect", "one_liner": "A visible attempt to suppress information becomes a high-salience signal that amplifies it, when the suppression act is itself observable to the audience.", "page_ref": "prime:streisand_effect", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Net amplification -> increased interest after targeting.", "slug": "streisand_effect", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires net amplification as the visible act creates a second-order audience and salience signal."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Targeting the information makes it more interesting than it was before suppression.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires copying to outrun removal so the intended containment fails and reach increases.", "role_mapping": "Copying-outpaces-pursuit -> failed full containment.", "slug": "streisand_effect", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b006_a08_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The information cannot be fully contained. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The information cannot be fully contained"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Streisand Effect", "one_liner": "A visible attempt to suppress information becomes a high-salience signal that amplifies it, when the suppression act is itself observable to the audience.", "page_ref": "prime:streisand_effect", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Copying-outpaces-pursuit -> failed full containment.", "slug": "streisand_effect", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires copying to outrun removal so the intended containment fails and reach increases."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The information cannot be fully contained because copying outpaces pursuit.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 6, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-006", "ledger_sha256": "74e72b23b127c01c1de2db886d4a7bcfc127e5e3acafeaa5a618314e3721e004"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Backlog Visibility", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:backlog_visibility", "slug": "backlog_visibility"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 4, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 4 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is decision blindness inside a waiting system. Work has entered a queue or backlog, but its state is not represented in a form that supports action. The system may know that “there is a backlog” while still not knowing its age distribution, priority mix, ownership distribution, blocked items, stale items, arrival rate, drain rate, or service-level breach risk.\n\nThis creates a mismatch between operational reality and governance reality. Obligations exist, but they are not visible as obligations. Delay accumulates, but it is not visible as delay. Ownership exists in theory, but not in a usable map. The result is hidden overload, surprise escalations, silent starvation, repeated status inquiries, and decisions based on anecdotes or averages.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A queue or backlog exists, but its size, age, priority mix, ownership, service-level risk, or drain rate is not visible enough to guide action."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires an otherwise-ready item to wait while external authorization remains unresolved.", "role_mapping": "Held ready item -> waiting work; authorization process -> active workflow boundary.", "slug": "permission_gated_hold", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b006_a09_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: work is known or suspected to be waiting outside the active workflow. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["work is known or suspected to be waiting outside the active workflow"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Permission-Gated Hold", "one_liner": "An otherwise ready flow remains blocked until an external authority emits a required authorization, making completion depend on administrative release rather than on the flow's own movement or production capacity.", "page_ref": "prime:permission_gated_hold", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Held ready item -> waiting work; authorization process -> active workflow boundary.", "slug": "permission_gated_hold", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires an otherwise-ready item to wait while external authorization remains unresolved."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Known or suspected work is waiting outside the active workflow.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The internal workflow lacks a reliable, item-level representation of all admitted obligations.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The internal workflow lacks a reliable, item-level representation of all admitted obligations.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires an eligible queued participant's liveness failure to remain invisible in aggregate throughput and snapshots.", "role_mapping": "Starved participant trajectory -> waiting item's service-level state; aggregate metrics -> aggregate backlog counts.", "slug": "starvation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b006_a09_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: aggregate counts hide age, priority, ownership, stage, exception, or service-level conditions. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["aggregate counts hide age, priority, ownership, stage, exception, or service-level conditions"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Starvation", "one_liner": "A participant who is eligible and in the queue is perpetually denied service, not by exclusion but because a locally rational priority rule always picks someone else.", "page_ref": "prime:starvation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Starved participant trajectory -> waiting item's service-level state; aggregate metrics -> aggregate backlog counts.", "slug": "starvation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires an eligible queued participant's liveness failure to remain invisible in aggregate throughput and snapshots."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Aggregate counts hide age, priority, ownership, stage, exception, or service-level state of waiting items.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The internal workflow lacks a reliable, item-level representation of all admitted obligations.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The internal workflow lacks a reliable, item-level representation of all admitted obligations.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A simplifying representation can improve agreement and need not be unreliable or hide obligations.", "slug": "legibility"}, {"falls_short_because": "A moving-system perception model does not require disagreement about backlog load state.", "slug": "situation_awareness"}], "residual_id": "r:backlog_visibility:b006_a09_c3", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_AMBIGUITY", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b006_a09_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: actors disagree about whether the system is overloaded, improving, or merely hiding accumulated obligations. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["actors disagree about whether the system is overloaded, improving, or merely hiding accumulated obligations"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A simplifying representation can improve agreement and need not be unreliable or hide obligations.", "slug": "legibility"}, {"falls_short_because": "A moving-system perception model does not require disagreement about backlog load state.", "slug": "situation_awareness"}], "normalized_requirement": "Actors disagree whether the system is overloaded, improving, or hiding obligations because queue state is not represented reliably.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_AMBIGUITY", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Actors disagree whether the system is overloaded, improving, or hiding obligations because queue state is not represented reliably.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The internal workflow lacks a reliable, item-level representation of all admitted obligations.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The internal workflow lacks a reliable, item-level representation of all admitted obligations.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A locally rational priority rule can starve an item for criteria other than newness, visibility, urgency, or ease.", "slug": "starvation"}, {"falls_short_because": "Removing surrounding state from a signal does not require a service discipline that neglects older work.", "slug": "context_stripping"}], "residual_id": "r:backlog_visibility:b006_a09_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b006_a09_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: old or neglected items can remain unresolved because only new, visible, urgent, or easy items receive attention. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["old or neglected items can remain unresolved because only new, visible, urgent, or easy items receive attention"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A locally rational priority rule can starve an item for criteria other than newness, visibility, urgency, or ease.", "slug": "starvation"}, {"falls_short_because": "Removing surrounding state from a signal does not require a service discipline that neglects older work.", "slug": "context_stripping"}], "normalized_requirement": "Old or neglected items remain unresolved because attention favors new, visible, urgent, or easy work.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Old or neglected items remain unresolved because attention favors new, visible, urgent, or easy work.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The internal workflow lacks a reliable, item-level representation of all admitted obligations.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The internal workflow lacks a reliable, item-level representation of all admitted obligations.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "capacity, admission, draining, queue discipline, or escalation decisions require knowing the real backlog state.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is also useful before applying bounded backlog, WIP limits, queue draining, or service-rate matching, because those interventions rely on knowing the current backlog state. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: capacity, admission, draining, queue discipline, or escalation decisions require knowing the real backlog state. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["capacity, admission, draining, queue discipline, or escalation decisions require knowing the real backlog state", "It is also useful before applying bounded backlog, WIP limits, queue draining, or service-rate matching, because those interventions rely on knowing the current backlog state."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "capacity, admission, draining, queue discipline, or escalation decisions require knowing the real backlog state"}, {"display_text": "waiting actors repeatedly ask for status because internal queue state is not represented reliably.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Work has entered a queue or backlog, but its state is not represented in a form that supports action. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: waiting actors repeatedly ask for status because internal queue state is not represented reliably. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["waiting actors repeatedly ask for status because internal queue state is not represented reliably", "Work has entered a queue or backlog, but its state is not represented in a form that supports action."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "waiting actors repeatedly ask for status because internal queue state is not represented reliably"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 6, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-006", "ledger_sha256": "74e72b23b127c01c1de2db886d4a7bcfc127e5e3acafeaa5a618314e3721e004"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Backpressure", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:backpressure", "slug": "backpressure"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 2 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 2}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "An upstream producer can generate or admit flow faster than a coupled downstream stage can absorb it, allowing hidden queue debt or overload to accumulate.", "explanation_source": {"field": "diagnostic_head", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "An upstream producer can generate or admit flow faster than a coupled downstream stage can absorb it, allowing hidden queue debt or overload to accumulate."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "This branch preserves the complete remedy-free diagnostic route; goals, feasibility clauses, gates, deployment constraints, and supporting context remain outside the DNF."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "EXT001-C007", "dnf": [["EXT001-U007-O1"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"obligation_id": "EXT001-U007-O1", "predicate": "An upstream stage can produce or admit flow faster than the downstream stage can absorb it."}], "predicate": "An upstream stage can produce or admit flow faster than the downstream stage can absorb it.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An upstream stage can produce or admit flow faster than the downstream stage can absorb it.", "unit_id": "EXT001-U007"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"catalog_exhaustion": "CONDITION_LEVEL", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact record describes an intervention, control, or achieved configuration rather than a pre-existing situation that necessarily entails the atom.", "slug": "backpressure"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: An upstream stage can produce or admit flow faster than the downstream stage can absorb it.", "slug": "pull_flow"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: An upstream stage can produce or admit flow faster than the downstream stage can absorb it.", "slug": "decoupling_point"}], "residual_id": "EXT001:backpressure:C01", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding."}}, "condition_id": "ext001_backpressure_a01", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored essence_one_line, compression_statement, components fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: An upstream stage can produce or admit flow faster than the downstream stage can absorb it.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["An upstream stage can produce or admit flow faster than the downstream stage can absorb it."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact record describes an intervention, control, or achieved configuration rather than a pre-existing situation that necessarily entails the atom.", "slug": "backpressure"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: An upstream stage can produce or admit flow faster than the downstream stage can absorb it.", "slug": "pull_flow"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: An upstream stage can produce or admit flow faster than the downstream stage can absorb it.", "slug": "decoupling_point"}], "normalized_requirement": "An upstream stage can produce or admit flow faster than the downstream stage can absorb it.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "An upstream stage can produce or admit flow faster than the downstream stage can absorb it.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "EXT001-C008", "dnf": [["EXT001-U008-O1"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"obligation_id": "EXT001-U008-O1", "predicate": "The coupled path allows excess inflow to accumulate as queue depth, latency, loss, or overload."}], "predicate": "The coupled path allows excess inflow to accumulate as queue depth, latency, loss, or overload.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "The coupled path allows excess inflow to accumulate as queue depth, latency, loss, or overload.", "unit_id": "EXT001-U008"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"catalog_exhaustion": "CONDITION_LEVEL", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The coupled path allows excess inflow to accumulate as queue depth, latency, loss, or overload.", "slug": "last_mile_failure"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The coupled path allows excess inflow to accumulate as queue depth, latency, loss, or overload.", "slug": "logistics_overreach"}, {"falls_short_because": "The exact record describes an intervention, control, or achieved configuration rather than a pre-existing situation that necessarily entails the atom.", "slug": "load_balancing"}], "residual_id": "EXT001:backpressure:C02", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding."}}, "condition_id": "ext001_backpressure_a02", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored essence_one_line, compression_statement, components fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: The coupled path allows excess inflow to accumulate as queue depth, latency, loss, or overload.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The coupled path allows excess inflow to accumulate as queue depth, latency, loss, or overload."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "EXTENSION_COUNTEREXAMPLE_AUDIT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "An instance that immediately stages or sheds arrivals still contains the threshold overload that makes each marginal arrival consume response capacity, so it does not falsify the condition.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Volunteer-Management Overload", "one_liner": "The crisis failure mode in which would-be helpers arrive faster than a response system's finite credential-brief-assign-supervise intake channel can absorb them, so beyond a threshold each marginal arrival consumes net capacity rather than adding it.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:volunteer_management_overload", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "volunteer_management_overload"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "volunteer_management_overload", "source_unit_id": "EXT001-U008", "why_it_fits": "Volunteer-management overload necessarily has arrivals exceeding a finite intake channel, producing queue or net overload in the coupled response path."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "EXTENSION_COUNTEREXAMPLE_AUDIT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Intermittent planned peak use is excluded by the DSA exact record; every complete instance is continuous, recovery-denied overload.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Overburden Waste (Muri)", "one_liner": "The lean-operations failure mode where people, machines, or processes are held continuously above their sustainable (not peak) capacity, converting apparent utilization gains into lagged, hidden costs — wear, defects, attrition, and downstream cascades — by consuming the very buffer that absorbs variation.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:overburden_waste", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "overburden_waste"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "overburden_waste", "source_unit_id": "EXT001-U008", "why_it_fits": "Overburden waste necessarily holds a receiving process above sustainable capacity, so excess work accumulates as overload and lagged loss in the coupled path."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The coupled path allows excess inflow to accumulate as queue depth, latency, loss, or overload.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Upstream production or admission can be slowed, paused, metered, or deferred.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored essence_one_line, compression_statement, components fields; the source file was not modified. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: Upstream production or admission can be slowed, paused, metered, or deferred. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Upstream production or admission can be slowed, paused, metered, or deferred.", "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored essence_one_line, compression_statement, components fields; the source file was not modified."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Upstream production or admission can be slowed, paused, metered, or deferred."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"candidate_ledger_sha256": "96f72d2139077fd57bf795048ebef33b3fd574b20963170080ec916b5b3b92fe", "extension_id": "new-archetypes-extension-001", "ledger_id": "prime-production-v1.2-extension-001", "ledger_sha256": "9644520614744632d1d36da44b1acd77ce432852c6083eb871203521c166efce"}, "base_projection_sha256": "841e0c7f3cb8e8054475ad29a8a14745a416b4fc115559a44878b94292e673ec", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "ca09ed9fe1598ce7072755b530de5553f5ee0a7cd64ae82d9e4a4e2149a37788", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Balance Preservation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:balance_preservation", "slug": "balance_preservation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 2 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 2}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is gradual overdominance. A system begins with multiple necessary dimensions, but ordinary incentives favor one of them: the easiest metric, loudest stakeholder, most urgent queue, strongest authority, most visible risk, or most politically rewarded priority. Over time, the favored dimension crowds out the rest.\n\nThis can look efficient at first. The fastest team gets more work. The growth metric receives more investment. The most vocal group gets more attention. The emergency exception is renewed again. The harm appears later as fragility, burnout, unfairness, narrow decision-making, institutional capture, or expensive reactive repair.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "System viability depends on several dimensions remaining in workable relation, while one dimension is crowding out or burdening the others."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "This branch preserves the complete remedy-free diagnostic route; goals, feasibility clauses, gates, deployment constraints, and supporting context remain outside the DNF."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "EXT001-C010", "dnf": [["EXT001-U010-O1"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"obligation_id": "EXT001-U010-O1", "predicate": "One metric, group, demand, priority, or subsystem crowds out other necessary dimensions."}], "predicate": "One metric, group, demand, priority, or subsystem crowds out other necessary dimensions.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "One metric, group, demand, priority, or subsystem crowds out other necessary dimensions.", "unit_id": "EXT001-U010"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"catalog_exhaustion": "CONDITION_LEVEL", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: One metric, group, demand, priority, or subsystem crowds out other necessary dimensions.", "slug": "commensurability"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: One metric, group, demand, priority, or subsystem crowds out other necessary dimensions.", "slug": "dimension"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: One metric, group, demand, priority, or subsystem crowds out other necessary dimensions.", "slug": "dense_set"}], "residual_id": "EXT001:balance_preservation:C02", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding."}}, "condition_id": "ext001_balance_preservation_a02", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored trigger_conditions, structural_problem fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: One metric, group, demand, priority, or subsystem crowds out other necessary dimensions.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["One metric, group, demand, priority, or subsystem crowds out other necessary dimensions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: One metric, group, demand, priority, or subsystem crowds out other necessary dimensions.", "slug": "commensurability"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: One metric, group, demand, priority, or subsystem crowds out other necessary dimensions.", "slug": "dimension"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: One metric, group, demand, priority, or subsystem crowds out other necessary dimensions.", "slug": "dense_set"}], "normalized_requirement": "One metric, group, demand, priority, or subsystem crowds out other necessary dimensions.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "One metric, group, demand, priority, or subsystem crowds out other necessary dimensions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "EXT001-C011", "dnf": [["EXT001-U011-O1"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"obligation_id": "EXT001-U011-O1", "predicate": "Neglecting those other dimensions would undermine function, legitimacy, or resilience."}], "predicate": "Neglecting those other dimensions would undermine function, legitimacy, or resilience.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Neglecting those other dimensions would undermine function, legitimacy, or resilience.", "unit_id": "EXT001-U011"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"catalog_exhaustion": "CONDITION_LEVEL", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Neglecting those other dimensions would undermine function, legitimacy, or resilience.", "slug": "fallacy_of_misplaced_concreteness"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Neglecting those other dimensions would undermine function, legitimacy, or resilience.", "slug": "trade_offs"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Neglecting those other dimensions would undermine function, legitimacy, or resilience.", "slug": "curse_of_dimensionality"}], "residual_id": "EXT001:balance_preservation:C03", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding."}}, "condition_id": "ext001_balance_preservation_a03", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored trigger_conditions, structural_problem fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: Neglecting those other dimensions would undermine function, legitimacy, or resilience.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Neglecting those other dimensions would undermine function, legitimacy, or resilience."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Neglecting those other dimensions would undermine function, legitimacy, or resilience.", "slug": "fallacy_of_misplaced_concreteness"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Neglecting those other dimensions would undermine function, legitimacy, or resilience.", "slug": "trade_offs"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Neglecting those other dimensions would undermine function, legitimacy, or resilience.", "slug": "curse_of_dimensionality"}], "normalized_requirement": "Neglecting those other dimensions would undermine function, legitimacy, or resilience.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Neglecting those other dimensions would undermine function, legitimacy, or resilience.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Work, attention, money, authority, representation, or risk repeatedly concentrates in one place or value dimension.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored trigger_conditions, structural_problem fields; the source file was not modified. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Work, attention, money, authority, representation, or risk repeatedly concentrates in one place or value dimension. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Work, attention, money, authority, representation, or risk repeatedly concentrates in one place or value dimension.", "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored trigger_conditions, structural_problem fields; the source file was not modified."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "Work, attention, money, authority, representation, or risk repeatedly concentrates in one place or value dimension."}, {"display_text": "Preventive correction is cheaper than restoring balance after breakdown.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored trigger_conditions, structural_problem fields; the source file was not modified. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: Preventive correction is cheaper than restoring balance after breakdown. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Preventive correction is cheaper than restoring balance after breakdown.", "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored trigger_conditions, structural_problem fields; the source file was not modified."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Preventive correction is cheaper than restoring balance after breakdown."}, {"display_text": "A temporary concentration may become a normalized structural imbalance.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored trigger_conditions, structural_problem fields; the source file was not modified. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: A temporary concentration may become a normalized structural imbalance. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A temporary concentration may become a normalized structural imbalance.", "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored trigger_conditions, structural_problem fields; the source file was not modified."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "A temporary concentration may become a normalized structural imbalance."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"candidate_ledger_sha256": "96f72d2139077fd57bf795048ebef33b3fd574b20963170080ec916b5b3b92fe", "extension_id": "new-archetypes-extension-001", "ledger_id": "prime-production-v1.2-extension-001", "ledger_sha256": "9644520614744632d1d36da44b1acd77ce432852c6083eb871203521c166efce"}, "base_projection_sha256": "841e0c7f3cb8e8054475ad29a8a14745a416b4fc115559a44878b94292e673ec", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "ca09ed9fe1598ce7072755b530de5553f5ee0a7cd64ae82d9e4a4e2149a37788", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": [{"groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "EXTENSION_COUNTEREXAMPLE_AUDIT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A single-attribute target is excluded by the DSA exact record; every complete instance has a multi-attribute target whose weighting concentrates on one focused attribute.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Focusing Effect (Focusing Illusion)", "one_liner": "Systematically overweight whatever attribute attention currently rests on when judging a complex multi-attribute target, so the focused feature dominates the constructed evaluation far above its real causal contribution while everything below the attentional threshold recedes.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:focusing_effect", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "focusing_effect"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "focusing_effect", "source_unit_id": "EXT001-U009", "why_it_fits": "The focusing effect necessarily concentrates attention and evaluative weight on one salient dimension while the remaining dimensions recede, directly instantiating the supporting condition's attention or value-dimension branch."}], "publication_role": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT_ONLY", "source_residual_occurrence_id": "EXT001:balance_preservation:C01", "unit": {"case_id": "EXT001-C009", "dnf": [["EXT001-U009-O1"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"obligation_id": "EXT001-U009-O1", "predicate": "Work, attention, money, authority, representation, or risk repeatedly concentrates in one place or value dimension."}], "predicate": "Work, attention, money, authority, representation, or risk repeatedly concentrates in one place or value dimension.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Work, attention, money, authority, representation, or risk repeatedly concentrates in one place or value dimension.", "unit_id": "EXT001-U009"}}]}
{"archetype": {"name": "Balancing Loop Stabilization", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:balancing_loop_stabilization", "slug": "balancing_loop_stabilization"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 3, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 3 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a broken balancing loop. The system has a desired range, but deviation does not reliably produce the right corrective response. Sometimes the signal is missing; sometimes the signal reaches the wrong actor; sometimes the response is too weak; sometimes the correction arrives after the state has changed; sometimes the actuator is saturated.\n\nThis creates drift, repeated emergencies, oscillation, false stability, and recurring corrective work that never becomes self-correcting.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system should return toward a target state or viable range after disturbance, but its balancing response is absent, weak, delayed, noisy, misdirected, or too strong."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Persistent tracking error need not cross the atom's acceptable-range threshold.", "slug": "reference_cadence_exceeds_tracking_bandwidth"}, {"falls_short_because": "Perturbation amplification does not require an available correction mechanism or a declared acceptable range.", "slug": "instability"}], "residual_id": "r:balancing_loop_stabilization:b006_a10_c1", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b006_a10_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A recurring variable drifts outside an acceptable range despite available correction mechanisms. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A recurring variable drifts outside an acceptable range despite available correction mechanisms."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Persistent tracking error need not cross the atom's acceptable-range threshold.", "slug": "reference_cadence_exceeds_tracking_bandwidth"}, {"falls_short_because": "Perturbation amplification does not require an available correction mechanism or a declared acceptable range.", "slug": "instability"}], "normalized_requirement": "A recurring variable departs an acceptable range despite available correction mechanisms.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A recurring variable departs an acceptable range despite available correction mechanisms.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Output-to-input influence may be positive, delayed, or unrelated to target deviation correction.", "slug": "feedback"}, {"falls_short_because": "A functioning internal stability regulator supplies the coupling rather than requiring it to be unreliable.", "slug": "homeostasis"}, {"falls_short_because": "An operating signed-gap correction process has the required coupling and does not entail its absence.", "slug": "discrepancy_driven_correction"}], "residual_id": "r:balancing_loop_stabilization:b006_a10_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b006_a10_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The system has a desired target but no reliable loop connecting deviation detection to corrective action. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The system has a desired target but no reliable loop connecting deviation detection to corrective action."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Output-to-input influence may be positive, delayed, or unrelated to target deviation correction.", "slug": "feedback"}, {"falls_short_because": "A functioning internal stability regulator supplies the coupling rather than requiring it to be unreliable.", "slug": "homeostasis"}, {"falls_short_because": "An operating signed-gap correction process has the required coupling and does not entail its absence.", "slug": "discrepancy_driven_correction"}], "normalized_requirement": "A target exists but deviation detection is not reliably coupled to corrective action.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A target exists but deviation detection is not reliably coupled to corrective action.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires the reference to move faster than the loop can track, producing persistent lag after the state has moved.", "role_mapping": "Moving reference -> tracked state; loop bandwidth -> correction speed; persistent lag -> correction after state movement.", "slug": "reference_cadence_exceeds_tracking_bandwidth", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b006_a10_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Correction occurs only after harm has accumulated or after the state has already moved elsewhere. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Correction occurs only after harm has accumulated or after the state has already moved elsewhere."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Reference Cadence Exceeds Tracking Bandwidth", "one_liner": "When the signal a closed loop must track changes faster than the loop's bandwidth, persistent error follows that no amount of executor effort can close.", "page_ref": "prime:reference_cadence_exceeds_tracking_bandwidth", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Moving reference -> tracked state; loop bandwidth -> correction speed; persistent lag -> correction after state movement.", "slug": "reference_cadence_exceeds_tracking_bandwidth", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires the reference to move faster than the loop can track, producing persistent lag after the state has moved."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Correction arrives only after harm accumulates or after the tracked state has moved elsewhere.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The departure and response belong to one balancing control relation rather than unrelated variation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The departure and response belong to one balancing control relation rather than unrelated variation.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Persistent tracking error need not cross the atom's acceptable-range threshold.", "slug": "reference_cadence_exceeds_tracking_bandwidth"}, {"falls_short_because": "Perturbation amplification does not require an available correction mechanism or a declared acceptable range.", "slug": "instability"}], "residual_id": "r:balancing_loop_stabilization:b006_a10_c1", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b006_a10_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A recurring variable drifts outside an acceptable range despite available correction mechanisms. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A recurring variable drifts outside an acceptable range despite available correction mechanisms."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Persistent tracking error need not cross the atom's acceptable-range threshold.", "slug": "reference_cadence_exceeds_tracking_bandwidth"}, {"falls_short_because": "Perturbation amplification does not require an available correction mechanism or a declared acceptable range.", "slug": "instability"}], "normalized_requirement": "A recurring variable departs an acceptable range despite available correction mechanisms.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A recurring variable departs an acceptable range despite available correction mechanisms.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a restoring mechanism plus storage or delay to carry the controlled state repeatedly past its reference.", "role_mapping": "Restoring mechanism -> corrective response; amplitude around reference -> overshoot/oscillation.", "slug": "oscillation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime requires an internal compensatory response to overshoot after a sustained input is withdrawn.", "role_mapping": "Internal compensation -> corrective response; post-withdrawal overshoot -> response overshoot.", "slug": "withdrawal_rebound", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b006_a10_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Responses overshoot, oscillate, or alternate between underreaction and overreaction. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Responses overshoot, oscillate, or alternate between underreaction and overreaction."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Oscillation", "one_liner": "Repeated variation.", "page_ref": "prime:oscillation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Restoring mechanism -> corrective response; amplitude around reference -> overshoot/oscillation.", "slug": "oscillation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a restoring mechanism plus storage or delay to carry the controlled state repeatedly past its reference."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Withdrawal Rebound", "one_liner": "A system that adapted to a sustained input by mounting an opposing internal compensation overshoots in the opposite direction when the input is abruptly removed, because the now-unopposed compensation is still pushing against an input that is no longer there.", "page_ref": "prime:withdrawal_rebound", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Internal compensation -> corrective response; post-withdrawal overshoot -> response overshoot.", "slug": "withdrawal_rebound", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires an internal compensatory response to overshoot after a sustained input is withdrawn."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Corrective responses overshoot, oscillate, or alternate between underreaction and overreaction.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The departure and response belong to one balancing control relation rather than unrelated variation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The departure and response belong to one balancing control relation rather than unrelated variation.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Persistent tracking error need not cross the atom's acceptable-range threshold.", "slug": "reference_cadence_exceeds_tracking_bandwidth"}, {"falls_short_because": "Perturbation amplification does not require an available correction mechanism or a declared acceptable range.", "slug": "instability"}], "residual_id": "r:balancing_loop_stabilization:b006_a10_c1", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b006_a10_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A recurring variable drifts outside an acceptable range despite available correction mechanisms. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A recurring variable drifts outside an acceptable range despite available correction mechanisms."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Persistent tracking error need not cross the atom's acceptable-range threshold.", "slug": "reference_cadence_exceeds_tracking_bandwidth"}, {"falls_short_because": "Perturbation amplification does not require an available correction mechanism or a declared acceptable range.", "slug": "instability"}], "normalized_requirement": "A recurring variable departs an acceptable range despite available correction mechanisms.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A recurring variable departs an acceptable range despite available correction mechanisms.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Cyclic return can occur under fully monitored dynamics and does not require absent intervention-effect monitoring.", "slug": "oscillation"}, {"falls_short_because": "Repeated refinement does not require recurrence caused by unmonitored correction.", "slug": "iteration"}], "residual_id": "r:balancing_loop_stabilization:b006_a10_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b006_a10_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The same deviation keeps recurring because corrective actions are not monitored for effect. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The same deviation keeps recurring because corrective actions are not monitored for effect."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Cyclic return can occur under fully monitored dynamics and does not require absent intervention-effect monitoring.", "slug": "oscillation"}, {"falls_short_because": "Repeated refinement does not require recurrence caused by unmonitored correction.", "slug": "iteration"}], "normalized_requirement": "The same deviation recurs because corrective actions are not monitored for effect.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The same deviation recurs because corrective actions are not monitored for effect.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The departure and response belong to one balancing control relation rather than unrelated variation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The departure and response belong to one balancing control relation rather than unrelated variation.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A first-wave loop map has identified a balancing loop, but the intervention need is retuning, strengthening, or closing the loop.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The structural problem is a broken balancing loop. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: A first-wave loop map has identified a balancing loop, but the intervention need is retuning, strengthening, or closing the loop. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A first-wave loop map has identified a balancing loop, but the intervention need is retuning, strengthening, or closing the loop.", "The structural problem is a broken balancing loop."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "A first-wave loop map has identified a balancing loop, but the intervention need is retuning, strengthening, or closing the loop."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 6, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-006", "ledger_sha256": "74e72b23b127c01c1de2db886d4a7bcfc127e5e3acafeaa5a618314e3721e004"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Baseline Covariate Balance Verification", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:baseline_covariate_balance_verification", "slug": "baseline_covariate_balance_verification"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 2, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 2 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A study or intervention claims that random assignment created comparable treatment and control groups, but the realized allocation may contain baseline differences that threaten validity, reduce precision, or make later outcome contrasts misleading.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A study or intervention claims that random assignment created comparable treatment and control groups, but the realized allocation may contain baseline differences that threaten validity, reduce precision, or make later outcome contrasts misleading."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P001-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must use limited sample size as the antecedent condition, not generic study complexity.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The risk-generating condition is a small realized or planned sample.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must target realized baseline-covariate imbalance, not outcome imbalance or abstract variance alone.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The risk outcome is imbalance in realized baseline covariates.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the directed risk contribution from small sample size to possible realized imbalance.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Small sample size makes the realized baseline imbalance plausible.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail a nontrivial possibility of imbalance without converting that risk into certain actuality.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The imbalance is materially plausible, not asserted as certain or already actual.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "Small samples make realized baseline imbalance materially plausible.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "small sample size raises realized baseline-imbalance possibility", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P001-C07-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P001-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must use few clusters as the antecedent condition, not merely a small count of unrelated objects.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The risk-generating condition is a limited number of assignment or comparison clusters.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must target realized baseline-covariate imbalance, not outcome imbalance or abstract variance alone.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The risk outcome is imbalance in realized baseline covariates.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the directed risk contribution from few clusters to possible realized imbalance.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Limited cluster count makes the realized baseline imbalance plausible.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail a nontrivial possibility of imbalance without converting that risk into certain actuality.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The imbalance is materially plausible, not asserted as certain or already actual.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "Few clusters make realized baseline imbalance materially plausible.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "limited cluster count raises realized baseline-imbalance possibility", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P001-C07-U2"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P001-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must use strongly prognostic baseline covariates as the antecedent, not covariates of unspecified relevance.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The risk-generating condition is the strong outcome-prognostic value of baseline covariates.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must target realized baseline-covariate imbalance involving the prognostic covariates.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The risk outcome is imbalance in those realized baseline covariates.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the directed risk contribution from strong prognostic relevance to material imbalance possibility.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Strong prognostic relevance makes realized baseline imbalance plausible.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail a nontrivial possibility of imbalance without converting that risk into certain actuality.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The imbalance is materially plausible, not asserted as certain or already actual.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "Strongly prognostic covariates make realized baseline imbalance materially plausible.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "strong covariate prognostic value raises realized baseline-imbalance possibility", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P001-C07-U3"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Co-movement between variables does not require small samples, limited clusters, or prognostic imbalance risk.", "slug": "covariance"}, {"falls_short_because": "Extreme-tail mass does not require any of the study-design risk factors in the atom.", "slug": "heavy_tailed_distributions"}], "residual_id": "r:baseline_covariate_balance_verification:b006_a11_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b006_a11_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The sample is small, the number of clusters is limited, or covariates are strongly prognostic of outcomes. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The sample is small, the number of clusters is limited, or covariates are strongly prognostic of outcomes."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 3, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 3}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Co-movement between variables does not require small samples, limited clusters, or prognostic imbalance risk.", "slug": "covariance"}, {"falls_short_because": "Extreme-tail mass does not require any of the study-design risk factors in the atom.", "slug": "heavy_tailed_distributions"}], "normalized_requirement": "Small samples, few clusters, or strongly prognostic covariates make realized baseline imbalance materially plausible.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 3 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Small samples, few clusters, or strongly prognostic covariates make realized baseline imbalance materially plausible.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The realized assignment may differ materially across baseline covariates despite the assignment procedure's ex-ante warrant.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The realized assignment may differ materially across baseline covariates despite the assignment procedure's ex-ante warrant.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P001-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require automation of the assignment process, not automation of an unrelated workflow.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The risk-generating process is an automated assignment process.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern implementation of the assignment process, not an unrelated operational process.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The affected process is implementation of assignment.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the directed risk contribution from assignment automation to the branch-specific implementation failure.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Assignment automation makes one of the listed implementation failures plausible.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail possibility or risk of the branch-specific failure without requiring that it has occurred.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The listed implementation failure is plausible rather than asserted as actual.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must keep the antecedent and branch-specific failure within the assignment-implementation domain.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The causal antecedent and listed failure both concern assignment implementation.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must identify an error in carrying out assignment as the plausible outcome.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The plausible assignment-implementation failure is implementation error.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must identify assignment-related leakage as the plausible outcome.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The plausible assignment-implementation failure is leakage.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must identify drift in assignment implementation as the plausible outcome.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The plausible assignment-implementation failure is implementation drift.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Automated assignment makes implementation error, leakage, or drift plausible.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "assignment automation makes a listed implementation failure mode plausible", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P001-C08-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P001-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require operational complexity in assignment, not complexity in an unrelated workflow.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The risk-generating process is an operationally complex assignment process.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern implementation of the assignment process, not an unrelated operational process.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The affected process is implementation of assignment.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the directed risk contribution from operational complexity to the branch-specific implementation failure.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Assignment operational complexity makes one of the listed implementation failures plausible.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail possibility or risk of the branch-specific failure without requiring that it has occurred.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The listed implementation failure is plausible rather than asserted as actual.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must keep the antecedent and branch-specific failure within the assignment-implementation domain.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The causal antecedent and listed failure both concern assignment implementation.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must identify an error in carrying out assignment as the plausible outcome.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The plausible assignment-implementation failure is implementation error.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must identify assignment-related leakage as the plausible outcome.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The plausible assignment-implementation failure is leakage.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must identify drift in assignment implementation as the plausible outcome.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The plausible assignment-implementation failure is implementation drift.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Operationally complex assignment makes implementation error, leakage, or drift plausible.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "assignment operational complexity makes a listed implementation failure mode plausible", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P001-C08-U2"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A controlled investigation need not automate assignment or have implementation error, leakage, or drift risk.", "slug": "experimental_design"}, {"falls_short_because": "Reference alignment and drift monitoring do not require treatment-assignment implementation risk.", "slug": "calibration"}], "residual_id": "r:baseline_covariate_balance_verification:b006_a11_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b006_a11_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Assignment is automated or operationally complex enough that errors, leakage, or implementation drift are plausible. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Assignment is automated or operationally complex enough that errors, leakage, or implementation drift are plausible."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 2, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 2}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A controlled investigation need not automate assignment or have implementation error, leakage, or drift risk.", "slug": "experimental_design"}, {"falls_short_because": "Reference alignment and drift monitoring do not require treatment-assignment implementation risk.", "slug": "calibration"}], "normalized_requirement": "Automated or operationally complex assignment makes implementation error, leakage, or drift plausible.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 2 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Automated or operationally complex assignment makes implementation error, leakage, or drift plausible.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The realized assignment may differ materially across baseline covariates despite the assignment procedure's ex-ante warrant.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The realized assignment may differ materially across baseline covariates despite the assignment procedure's ex-ante warrant.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Treatment or exposure assignment is randomized, pseudo-randomized, blocked, clustered, or claimed to be balanced.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A study or intervention claims that random assignment created comparable treatment and control groups, but the realized allocation may contain baseline differences that threaten validity, reduce precision, or make later outcome contrasts misleading. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Treatment or exposure assignment is randomized, pseudo-randomized, blocked, clustered, or claimed to be balanced. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Treatment or exposure assignment is randomized, pseudo-randomized, blocked, clustered, or claimed to be balanced.", "A study or intervention claims that random assignment created comparable treatment and control groups, but the realized allocation may contain baseline differences that threaten validity, reduce precision, or make later outcome contrasts misleading."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "Treatment or exposure assignment is randomized, pseudo-randomized, blocked, clustered, or claimed to be balanced."}, {"display_text": "Outcome interpretation depends on groups being comparable before treatment begins.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A study or intervention claims that random assignment created comparable treatment and control groups, but the realized allocation may contain baseline differences that threaten validity, reduce precision, or make later outcome contrasts misleading. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: Outcome interpretation depends on groups being comparable before treatment begins. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Outcome interpretation depends on groups being comparable before treatment begins.", "A study or intervention claims that random assignment created comparable treatment and control groups, but the realized allocation may contain baseline differences that threaten validity, reduce precision, or make later outcome contrasts misleading."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "Outcome interpretation depends on groups being comparable before treatment begins."}, {"display_text": "Stakeholders need evidence that randomization worked before accepting causal claims.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: Stakeholders need evidence that randomization worked before accepting causal claims. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders need evidence that randomization worked before accepting causal claims."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Stakeholders need evidence that randomization worked before accepting causal claims."}, {"display_text": "Baseline measurements are available before treatment and can be compared without post-treatment contamination.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A study or intervention claims that random assignment created comparable treatment and control groups, but the realized allocation may contain baseline differences that threaten validity, reduce precision, or make later outcome contrasts misleading. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: Baseline measurements are available before treatment and can be compared without post-treatment contamination. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Baseline measurements are available before treatment and can be compared without post-treatment contamination.", "A study or intervention claims that random assignment created comparable treatment and control groups, but the realized allocation may contain baseline differences that threaten validity, reduce precision, or make later outcome contrasts misleading."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Baseline measurements are available before treatment and can be compared without post-treatment contamination."}, {"display_text": "Regulatory, scientific, or operational reporting expects a baseline table or diagnostic balance evidence.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this deployment constraint: Regulatory, scientific, or operational reporting expects a baseline table or diagnostic balance evidence. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Regulatory, scientific, or operational reporting expects a baseline table or diagnostic balance evidence."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "Regulatory, scientific, or operational reporting expects a baseline table or diagnostic balance evidence."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 6, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-006", "ledger_sha256": "74e72b23b127c01c1de2db886d4a7bcfc127e5e3acafeaa5a618314e3721e004"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Batch Size Calibration", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:batch_size_calibration", "slug": "batch_size_calibration"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 2, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 5, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 7 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 2 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 7}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A stream of discrete work is being grouped by habit, convenience, policy, or inherited tooling rather than by an explicit tradeoff. Oversized batches reduce visible transaction cost while creating queues, late feedback, inventory, rework, stale information, correlated failure, and downstream overload. Undersized batches preserve responsiveness but can waste capacity through repeated setup, context switching, coordination, approval, or release overhead. Without batch-size calibration, the system optimizes the most visible cost term while pushing hidden costs into flow, risk, and learning delay.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A stream of discrete work is being grouped by habit, convenience, policy, or inherited tooling rather than by an explicit tradeoff. Oversized batches reduce visible transaction cost while creating queues, late feedback, inventory, rework, stale information, correlated failure, and downstream overload. Undersized batches preserve responsiveness but can waste capacity through repeated setup, context switching, coordination, approval, or release overhead. Without batch-size calibration, the system optimizes the most visible cost term while pushing hidden costs into flow, risk, and learning delay."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a stream of separable work items that can be handled individually and grouped for one operation.", "role_mapping": "Discrete work-items -> separable groupable items.", "slug": "batch_processing", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime requires nominally independent arriving items that can be processed singly or in groups.", "role_mapping": "Stream items -> separable groupable work items.", "slug": "batch_size", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b006_a12_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Work items are separable enough to process singly but similar enough to group. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Work items are separable enough to process singly but similar enough to group."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Batch Processing", "one_liner": "Collect many discrete work-items so a costly setup is paid once and amortised over the group, trading lower per-item cost for higher per-item latency.", "page_ref": "prime:batch_processing", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Discrete work-items -> separable groupable items.", "slug": "batch_processing", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a stream of separable work items that can be handled individually and grouped for one operation."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Batch Size", "one_liner": "The granularity at which a stream of work is grouped, trading setup cost amortised per item against flow, delay, risk, and feedback-lag costs that rise with the group — producing an interior optimum.", "page_ref": "prime:batch_size", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Stream items -> separable groupable work items.", "slug": "batch_size", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires nominally independent arriving items that can be processed singly or in groups."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Work items are independently processable but sufficiently homogeneous to group.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a fixed per-batch setup cost independent of item count and amortized by grouping.", "role_mapping": "Fixed setup -> per-group cost; grouped items -> amortization.", "slug": "batch_processing", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime requires a per-batch fixed cost that shrinks per item as grouping granularity grows.", "role_mapping": "Per-batch fixed cost -> enumerated group cost.", "slug": "batch_size", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b006_a12_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Undersized batches preserve responsiveness but can waste capacity through repeated setup, context switching, coordination, approval, or release overhead. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A fixed setup, switching, ordering, approval, handoff, inspection, or release cost is paid per group rather than per item.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A fixed setup, switching, ordering, approval, handoff, inspection, or release cost is paid per group rather than per item.", "Undersized batches preserve responsiveness but can waste capacity through repeated setup, context switching, coordination, approval, or release overhead."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Batch Processing", "one_liner": "Collect many discrete work-items so a costly setup is paid once and amortised over the group, trading lower per-item cost for higher per-item latency.", "page_ref": "prime:batch_processing", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Fixed setup -> per-group cost; grouped items -> amortization.", "slug": "batch_processing", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a fixed per-batch setup cost independent of item count and amortized by grouping."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Batch Size", "one_liner": "The granularity at which a stream of work is grouped, trading setup cost amortised per item against flow, delay, risk, and feedback-lag costs that rise with the group — producing an interior optimum.", "page_ref": "prime:batch_size", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Per-batch fixed cost -> enumerated group cost.", "slug": "batch_size", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a per-batch fixed cost that shrinks per item as grouping granularity grows."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A fixed setup, switching, ordering, approval, handoff, inspection, or release cost is paid per group rather than per item.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires items to wait for filling or a scheduled flush, raising per-item latency and batch failure exposure.", "role_mapping": "Latency trade -> waiting/feedback lag; grouped fate -> risk exposure.", "slug": "batch_processing", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime requires flow, delay, coupling-of-fate, and feedback-lag costs to rise with grouping granularity.", "role_mapping": "Flow cost -> waiting/holding; coupling -> risk; feedback lag -> staleness.", "slug": "batch_size", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b006_a12_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Waiting, holding, staleness, feedback lag, or risk exposure increases as the group grows. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Waiting, holding, staleness, feedback lag, or risk exposure increases as the group grows."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Batch Processing", "one_liner": "Collect many discrete work-items so a costly setup is paid once and amortised over the group, trading lower per-item cost for higher per-item latency.", "page_ref": "prime:batch_processing", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Latency trade -> waiting/feedback lag; grouped fate -> risk exposure.", "slug": "batch_processing", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires items to wait for filling or a scheduled flush, raising per-item latency and batch failure exposure."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Batch Size", "one_liner": "The granularity at which a stream of work is grouped, trading setup cost amortised per item against flow, delay, risk, and feedback-lag costs that rise with the group — producing an interior optimum.", "page_ref": "prime:batch_size", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Flow cost -> waiting/holding; coupling -> risk; feedback lag -> staleness.", "slug": "batch_size", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires flow, delay, coupling-of-fate, and feedback-lag costs to rise with grouping granularity."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Waiting, holding, staleness, feedback lag, or risk exposure rises with group size.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a downstream consumer with finite limiting capacity and treats excess upstream release as queue debt or overflow.", "role_mapping": "Downstream consumer -> downstream stage; finite maximum rate -> absorption capacity; excess inflow -> burst harm.", "slug": "backpressure", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b006_a12_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Downstream stages have finite absorption capacity or are harmed by bursty release. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Downstream stages have finite absorption capacity or are harmed by bursty release."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Backpressure", "one_liner": "A return signal from a downstream stage throttles upstream production to its own capacity, converting a one-way push into a two-way conversation that holds the system at the bottleneck's throughput instead of accumulating hidden queue debt.", "page_ref": "prime:backpressure", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Downstream consumer -> downstream stage; finite maximum rate -> absorption capacity; excess inflow -> burst harm.", "slug": "backpressure", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a downstream consumer with finite limiting capacity and treats excess upstream release as queue debt or overflow."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A downstream stage has finite absorption capacity or is harmed by bursty release.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime defines an interior optimum over falling setup cost and rising flow, risk, and feedback costs, so changing those parameters changes the preferred N.", "role_mapping": "Interior optimum N -> preferred batch size; cost parameters -> automation, risk, and quality changes.", "slug": "batch_size", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b006_a12_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The preferred batch size changes when automation, demand variability, risk tolerance, or quality costs change. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The preferred batch size changes when automation, demand variability, risk tolerance, or quality costs change."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Batch Size", "one_liner": "The granularity at which a stream of work is grouped, trading setup cost amortised per item against flow, delay, risk, and feedback-lag costs that rise with the group — producing an interior optimum.", "page_ref": "prime:batch_size", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Interior optimum N -> preferred batch size; cost parameters -> automation, risk, and quality changes.", "slug": "batch_size", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime defines an interior optimum over falling setup cost and rising flow, risk, and feedback costs, so changing those parameters changes the preferred N."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The cost-minimizing batch size changes when setup, automation, variability, risk tolerance, or quality costs change.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime explicitly defines the cost surface and does not require participants to debate while leaving it implicit.", "slug": "batch_size"}, {"falls_short_because": "Use of a common metric does not require the particular efficiency-responsiveness batch debate.", "slug": "commensurability"}], "residual_id": "r:batch_size_calibration:b006_a12_c6", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b006_a12_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: People debate “large efficient batches” versus “small responsive batches” without making the cost surface explicit. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["People debate “large efficient batches” versus “small responsive batches” without making the cost surface explicit."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime explicitly defines the cost surface and does not require participants to debate while leaving it implicit.", "slug": "batch_size"}, {"falls_short_because": "Use of a common metric does not require the particular efficiency-responsiveness batch debate.", "slug": "commensurability"}], "normalized_requirement": "Participants debate large efficiency versus small responsiveness without an explicit total-cost surface.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Participants debate large efficiency versus small responsiveness without an explicit total-cost surface.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a stream of separable work items that can be handled individually and grouped for one operation.", "role_mapping": "Discrete work-items -> separable groupable items.", "slug": "batch_processing", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime requires nominally independent arriving items that can be processed singly or in groups.", "role_mapping": "Stream items -> separable groupable work items.", "slug": "batch_size", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b006_a12_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Work items are separable enough to process singly but similar enough to group. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Work items are separable enough to process singly but similar enough to group."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Batch Processing", "one_liner": "Collect many discrete work-items so a costly setup is paid once and amortised over the group, trading lower per-item cost for higher per-item latency.", "page_ref": "prime:batch_processing", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Discrete work-items -> separable groupable items.", "slug": "batch_processing", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a stream of separable work items that can be handled individually and grouped for one operation."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Batch Size", "one_liner": "The granularity at which a stream of work is grouped, trading setup cost amortised per item against flow, delay, risk, and feedback-lag costs that rise with the group — producing an interior optimum.", "page_ref": "prime:batch_size", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Stream items -> separable groupable work items.", "slug": "batch_size", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires nominally independent arriving items that can be processed singly or in groups."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Work items are independently processable but sufficiently homogeneous to group.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a fixed per-batch setup cost independent of item count and amortized by grouping.", "role_mapping": "Fixed setup -> per-group cost; grouped items -> amortization.", "slug": "batch_processing", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime requires a per-batch fixed cost that shrinks per item as grouping granularity grows.", "role_mapping": "Per-batch fixed cost -> enumerated group cost.", "slug": "batch_size", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b006_a12_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Undersized batches preserve responsiveness but can waste capacity through repeated setup, context switching, coordination, approval, or release overhead. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A fixed setup, switching, ordering, approval, handoff, inspection, or release cost is paid per group rather than per item.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A fixed setup, switching, ordering, approval, handoff, inspection, or release cost is paid per group rather than per item.", "Undersized batches preserve responsiveness but can waste capacity through repeated setup, context switching, coordination, approval, or release overhead."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Batch Processing", "one_liner": "Collect many discrete work-items so a costly setup is paid once and amortised over the group, trading lower per-item cost for higher per-item latency.", "page_ref": "prime:batch_processing", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Fixed setup -> per-group cost; grouped items -> amortization.", "slug": "batch_processing", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a fixed per-batch setup cost independent of item count and amortized by grouping."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Batch Size", "one_liner": "The granularity at which a stream of work is grouped, trading setup cost amortised per item against flow, delay, risk, and feedback-lag costs that rise with the group — producing an interior optimum.", "page_ref": "prime:batch_size", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Per-batch fixed cost -> enumerated group cost.", "slug": "batch_size", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a per-batch fixed cost that shrinks per item as grouping granularity grows."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A fixed setup, switching, ordering, approval, handoff, inspection, or release cost is paid per group rather than per item.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires items to wait for filling or a scheduled flush, raising per-item latency and batch failure exposure.", "role_mapping": "Latency trade -> waiting/feedback lag; grouped fate -> risk exposure.", "slug": "batch_processing", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime requires flow, delay, coupling-of-fate, and feedback-lag costs to rise with grouping granularity.", "role_mapping": "Flow cost -> waiting/holding; coupling -> risk; feedback lag -> staleness.", "slug": "batch_size", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b006_a12_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Waiting, holding, staleness, feedback lag, or risk exposure increases as the group grows. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Waiting, holding, staleness, feedback lag, or risk exposure increases as the group grows."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Batch Processing", "one_liner": "Collect many discrete work-items so a costly setup is paid once and amortised over the group, trading lower per-item cost for higher per-item latency.", "page_ref": "prime:batch_processing", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Latency trade -> waiting/feedback lag; grouped fate -> risk exposure.", "slug": "batch_processing", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires items to wait for filling or a scheduled flush, raising per-item latency and batch failure exposure."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Batch Size", "one_liner": "The granularity at which a stream of work is grouped, trading setup cost amortised per item against flow, delay, risk, and feedback-lag costs that rise with the group — producing an interior optimum.", "page_ref": "prime:batch_size", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Flow cost -> waiting/holding; coupling -> risk; feedback lag -> staleness.", "slug": "batch_size", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires flow, delay, coupling-of-fate, and feedback-lag costs to rise with grouping granularity."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Waiting, holding, staleness, feedback lag, or risk exposure rises with group size.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a downstream consumer with finite limiting capacity and treats excess upstream release as queue debt or overflow.", "role_mapping": "Downstream consumer -> downstream stage; finite maximum rate -> absorption capacity; excess inflow -> burst harm.", "slug": "backpressure", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b006_a12_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Downstream stages have finite absorption capacity or are harmed by bursty release. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Downstream stages have finite absorption capacity or are harmed by bursty release."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Backpressure", "one_liner": "A return signal from a downstream stage throttles upstream production to its own capacity, converting a one-way push into a two-way conversation that holds the system at the bottleneck's throughput instead of accumulating hidden queue debt.", "page_ref": "prime:backpressure", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Downstream consumer -> downstream stage; finite maximum rate -> absorption capacity; excess inflow -> burst harm.", "slug": "backpressure", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a downstream consumer with finite limiting capacity and treats excess upstream release as queue debt or overflow."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A downstream stage has finite absorption capacity or is harmed by bursty release.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime defines an interior optimum over falling setup cost and rising flow, risk, and feedback costs, so changing those parameters changes the preferred N.", "role_mapping": "Interior optimum N -> preferred batch size; cost parameters -> automation, risk, and quality changes.", "slug": "batch_size", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b006_a12_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The preferred batch size changes when automation, demand variability, risk tolerance, or quality costs change. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The preferred batch size changes when automation, demand variability, risk tolerance, or quality costs change."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Batch Size", "one_liner": "The granularity at which a stream of work is grouped, trading setup cost amortised per item against flow, delay, risk, and feedback-lag costs that rise with the group — producing an interior optimum.", "page_ref": "prime:batch_size", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Interior optimum N -> preferred batch size; cost parameters -> automation, risk, and quality changes.", "slug": "batch_size", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime defines an interior optimum over falling setup cost and rising flow, risk, and feedback costs, so changing those parameters changes the preferred N."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The cost-minimizing batch size changes when setup, automation, variability, risk tolerance, or quality costs change.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A drifting world can invalidate a rule even when the rule remains explicit and actively reviewed.", "slug": "calibrated_rule_vs_moving_world"}, {"falls_short_because": "Measurement-practice drift is not an inherited work-grouping cadence.", "slug": "instrument_interpretive_drift"}], "residual_id": "r:batch_size_calibration:b006_a12_c7", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b006_a12_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A queue, release train, review cadence, production lot, or data-processing window has become an implicit policy rather than an actively tuned parameter. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A queue, release train, review cadence, production lot, or data-processing window has become an implicit policy rather than an actively tuned parameter."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A drifting world can invalidate a rule even when the rule remains explicit and actively reviewed.", "slug": "calibrated_rule_vs_moving_world"}, {"falls_short_because": "Measurement-practice drift is not an inherited work-grouping cadence.", "slug": "instrument_interpretive_drift"}], "normalized_requirement": "An inherited queue, cadence, lot, release train, or window functions as an implicit rather than actively tuned batch-size policy.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "An inherited queue, cadence, lot, release train, or window functions as an implicit rather than actively tuned batch-size policy.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 6, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-006", "ledger_sha256": "74e72b23b127c01c1de2db886d4a7bcfc127e5e3acafeaa5a618314e3721e004"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Bayesian Belief Updating", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:bayesian_belief_updating", "slug": "bayesian_belief_updating"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 3 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is misweighted evidence. One failure mode is overreaction: a vivid new observation is treated as decisive even though its base rate, reliability, or likelihood under alternatives is weak. Another failure mode is inertia: old assumptions remain in force even when credible evidence should revise them. A third failure mode is opacity: reviewers cannot tell whether the conclusion came from prior assumptions, new evidence, the update rule, or the decision threshold.\n\nThis problem often appears when people interpret test results, alerts, forecasts, or anomalies in isolation. It also appears in organizations that claim to “update their beliefs” but only adjust their narrative after the fact. Without an explicit update structure, belief revision becomes vulnerable to base-rate neglect, confirmation bias, stale priors, double-counted evidence, and false precision.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Actors interpret each new observation as if it stands alone, or they cling to initial assumptions even when new evidence should change belief. The result is unstable inference, base-rate neglect, overconfident reaction to weak evidence, or unexamined priors that dominate conclusions."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A Bayesian likelihood can represent perfectly diagnostic evidence and does not require noise, delay, selection, or interpretive plurality.", "slug": "bayesian_updating"}, {"falls_short_because": "Incomplete knowledge need not be a property of the new evidence or include any enumerated evidence defect.", "slug": "uncertainty"}], "residual_id": "r:bayesian_belief_updating:b006_a13_c3", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b006_a13_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: New evidence is informative but imperfect, noisy, correlated, delayed, selected, or open to multiple interpretations. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["New evidence is informative but imperfect, noisy, correlated, delayed, selected, or open to multiple interpretations."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A Bayesian likelihood can represent perfectly diagnostic evidence and does not require noise, delay, selection, or interpretive plurality.", "slug": "bayesian_updating"}, {"falls_short_because": "Incomplete knowledge need not be a property of the new evidence or include any enumerated evidence defect.", "slug": "uncertainty"}], "normalized_requirement": "New evidence is informative but imperfect, noisy, correlated, delayed, selected, or multiply interpretable.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "New evidence is informative but imperfect, noisy, correlated, delayed, selected, or multiply interpretable.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires asymmetric attention or weight favoring confirming evidence and neglecting disconfirmation.", "role_mapping": "Prior belief -> established expectation; asymmetric processing -> overweight confirmation or dismiss conflict.", "slug": "confirmation_bias", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b006_a13_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: People are tempted to treat vivid evidence as decisive or to dismiss new evidence because it conflicts with established expectations. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["People are tempted to treat vivid evidence as decisive or to dismiss new evidence because it conflicts with established expectations."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Confirmation Bias", "one_liner": "Favor confirming evidence.", "page_ref": "prime:confirmation_bias", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Prior belief -> established expectation; asymmetric processing -> overweight confirmation or dismiss conflict.", "slug": "confirmation_bias", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires asymmetric attention or weight favoring confirming evidence and neglecting disconfirmation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Actors overweight vivid confirming evidence or discount evidence that conflicts with established expectations.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "Current actors are either treating observations in isolation or preserving priors despite evidence that should move them.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Current actors are either treating observations in isolation or preserving priors despite evidence that should move them.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A decision depends on a probability, diagnosis, forecast, risk estimate, or belief state that should change as evidence accumulates.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when decisions depend on a probability, diagnosis, forecast, risk estimate, or belief state that should change as evidence accumulates. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: A decision depends on a probability, diagnosis, forecast, risk estimate, or belief state that should change as evidence accumulates. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A decision depends on a probability, diagnosis, forecast, risk estimate, or belief state that should change as evidence accumulates.", "Use this archetype when decisions depend on a probability, diagnosis, forecast, risk estimate, or belief state that should change as evidence accumulates."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "A decision depends on a probability, diagnosis, forecast, risk estimate, or belief state that should change as evidence accumulates."}, {"display_text": "There is meaningful prior information from base rates, historical data, expert judgment, previous measurements, or earlier posteriors.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when there is meaningful prior information: base rates, historical performance, expert judgment, previous measurements, previous posteriors, or background knowledge. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: There is meaningful prior information from base rates, historical data, expert judgment, previous measurements, or earlier posteriors. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["There is meaningful prior information from base rates, historical data, expert judgment, previous measurements, or earlier posteriors.", "It is especially useful when there is meaningful prior information: base rates, historical performance, expert judgment, previous measurements, previous posteriors, or background knowledge."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "There is meaningful prior information from base rates, historical data, expert judgment, previous measurements, or earlier posteriors."}, {"display_text": "The cost of acting too early differs from the cost of waiting too long.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: The cost of acting too early differs from the cost of waiting too long. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The cost of acting too early differs from the cost of waiting too long."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The cost of acting too early differs from the cost of waiting too long."}, {"display_text": "Repeated signals must be combined without double-counting the same information.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Without an explicit update structure, belief revision becomes vulnerable to base-rate neglect, confirmation bias, stale priors, double-counted evidence, and false precision. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: Repeated signals must be combined without double-counting the same information. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Repeated signals must be combined without double-counting the same information.", "Without an explicit update structure, belief revision becomes vulnerable to base-rate neglect, confirmation bias, stale priors, double-counted evidence, and false precision."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Repeated signals must be combined without double-counting the same information."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 6, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-006", "ledger_sha256": "74e72b23b127c01c1de2db886d4a7bcfc127e5e3acafeaa5a618314e3721e004"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Behavior-Preserving Refactoring", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:behavior_preserving_refactoring", "slug": "behavior_preserving_refactoring"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 4, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 2, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 4 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A working system has an internal organization that amplifies change cost, defect risk, coupling, cognitive load, or maintenance burden, yet users and dependent systems require its observable behavior to remain stable during improvement.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A working system has an internal organization that amplifies change cost, defect risk, coupling, cognitive load, or maintenance burden, yet users and dependent systems require its observable behavior to remain stable during improvement."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P001-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must use a small change as the initiating operation, not a wholesale redesign.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The initiating operation is a small change to the system.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail mandatory coordinated edit fanout across internal loci caused by the small change.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The small change requires coordinated edits distributed across internal system locations.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require high fanout across many internal locations, not one or a few loci.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The edit fanout reaches many internal locations.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must type the distributed targets as loci within the system at which edits are made.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The edit targets are internal system locations rather than organizational actors.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}], "predicate": "Small changes require coordinated edits across many internal locations.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "small change requires coordinated editing at many internal locations", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P001-C09-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P001-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must use a small change as the initiating operation, not a wholesale redesign.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The initiating operation is a small change to the system.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail mandatory cross-team coordination of edits caused by the small change.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The small change requires edit work to be coordinated across teams.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must type the distributed roles as teams or organizational ownership domains, not internal code or document locations.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The coordination participants are organizational teams or ownership domains.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require coordination across many teams, not one team or a single bilateral handoff.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The required edit coordination spans many teams.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}], "predicate": "Small changes require edits coordinated across many teams.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "small change requires cross-team edit coordination", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P001-C09-U2"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Internal restructuring is the remedy and can be undertaken without prior high edit fanout.", "slug": "refactoring"}, {"falls_short_because": "A preference for adding components does not require a small change to touch many locations.", "slug": "additive_bias"}, {"falls_short_because": "A compliant extension surface prevents rather than requires distributed edits.", "slug": "open_closed_principle"}], "residual_id": "r:behavior_preserving_refactoring:b006_a14_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b006_a14_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Small changes require edits across many internal locations or teams. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Small changes require edits across many internal locations or teams."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 2, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 2}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Internal restructuring is the remedy and can be undertaken without prior high edit fanout.", "slug": "refactoring"}, {"falls_short_because": "A preference for adding components does not require a small change to touch many locations.", "slug": "additive_bias"}, {"falls_short_because": "A compliant extension surface prevents rather than requires distributed edits.", "slug": "open_closed_principle"}], "normalized_requirement": "Small changes require coordinated edits across many internal locations or teams.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 2 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Small changes require coordinated edits across many internal locations or teams.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The internal change is necessary while the governed external behavior remains a binding invariant.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The internal change is necessary while the governed external behavior remains a binding invariant.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P001-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require duplication of internal logic, not merely generic complexity or repetition.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The obstructing internal condition is duplicated logic.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail directed obstruction of evolution by the duplicated logic.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Duplicated logic obstructs the system's evolution.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve safety-qualified system evolution as the obstructed target.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The obstructed activity is safe evolution of the system.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Duplicated logic obstructs safe evolution.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "duplicated logic obstructs safe system evolution", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P001-C10-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P001-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require tangled internal dependencies, not merely the existence of dependencies.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The obstructing internal condition is a tangle of dependencies.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail directed obstruction of evolution by the dependency tangle.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Tangled dependencies obstruct the system's evolution.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve safety-qualified system evolution as the obstructed target.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The obstructed activity is safe evolution of the system.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Tangled dependencies obstruct safe evolution.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "tangled dependencies obstruct safe system evolution", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P001-C10-U2"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P001-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require ambiguity in responsibility or ownership, not a generic staffing concern.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The obstructing internal condition is unclear responsibility.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail directed obstruction of evolution by responsibility ambiguity.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Unclear responsibility obstructs the system's evolution.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve safety-qualified system evolution as the obstructed target.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The obstructed activity is safe evolution of the system.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Unclear responsibility obstructs safe evolution.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "unclear responsibility obstructs safe system evolution", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P001-C10-U3"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P001-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require debt in the system's representation structure, not arbitrary technical debt.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The obstructing internal condition is representation debt.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail directed obstruction of evolution by representation debt.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Representation debt obstructs the system's evolution.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve safety-qualified system evolution as the obstructed target.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The obstructed activity is safe evolution of the system.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Representation debt obstructs safe evolution.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "representation debt obstructs safe system evolution", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P001-C10-U4"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A behavior-preserving restructuring operation does not require every listed form of antecedent debt.", "slug": "refactoring"}, {"falls_short_because": "Removable implementation difficulty need not obstruct safe evolution or take one of the enumerated debt forms.", "slug": "accidental_vs_essential_complexity"}, {"falls_short_because": "A readability overlay over structural confusion does not require evolution to be obstructed.", "slug": "explanatory_overlay_masking_structural_debt"}], "residual_id": "r:behavior_preserving_refactoring:b006_a14_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b006_a14_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Duplicated logic, tangled dependencies, unclear responsibilities, or representation debt obstruct safe evolution. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Duplicated logic, tangled dependencies, unclear responsibilities, or representation debt obstruct safe evolution."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PARTIALLY_DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "The exact record excludes the apparent counterexample of tangled code that remains safely modifiable: spaghetti code is defined only after locality and safe modifiability have collapsed.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Spaghetti Code", "one_liner": "Diagnose a codebase as unmaintainable by reading its dependency graph: when boundary-violating edges accumulate past a threshold, the cost of any local change scales with the whole system rather than the unit being changed.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:spaghetti_code", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "spaghetti_code"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "spaghetti_code", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P001-C10-U2", "why_it_fits": "Both readers correctly found that every spaghetti-code instance entails the sole complete DNF branch: tangled dependencies directly obstruct safe system evolution. No qualifier, subtype selection, or polarity change is needed."}], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 4, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 1, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 3}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A behavior-preserving restructuring operation does not require every listed form of antecedent debt.", "slug": "refactoring"}, {"falls_short_because": "Removable implementation difficulty need not obstruct safe evolution or take one of the enumerated debt forms.", "slug": "accidental_vs_essential_complexity"}, {"falls_short_because": "A readability overlay over structural confusion does not require evolution to be obstructed.", "slug": "explanatory_overlay_masking_structural_debt"}], "normalized_requirement": "Duplicated logic, tangled dependencies, unclear responsibility, or representation debt obstructs safe evolution.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "PARTIAL_EXISTING_DSA_GROUNDING", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation grounded 1 of 4 eligible atomic units; the remaining unit or units stayed open."}, "predicate": "Duplicated logic, tangled dependencies, unclear responsibility, or representation debt obstructs safe evolution.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The internal change is necessary while the governed external behavior remains a binding invariant.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The internal change is necessary while the governed external behavior remains a binding invariant.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P001-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must assign the blocking role to current internal structure, not to users or an external constraint.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The blocking source is the system's current internal structure.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require blockage of a future extension, not failure of current behavior.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The blocked target is a future extension of the system.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail directed blockage from internal structure to future extensibility.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The current internal structure blocks the future extension.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the current-versus-future temporal contrast.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The blocking structure and acceptable behavior are current, while the extension is future.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must attach acceptability to current external behavior rather than to the internal structure.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The concurrently evaluated behavior is the system's external behavior.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail coexistence of acceptable current external behavior with internal blockage of future extension.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "Current external behavior remains acceptable despite the blocked future extension.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Current internal structure blocks a future extension although current external behavior is acceptable.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "current internal structure blocks future extension despite acceptable current behavior", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P001-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A functioning extension surface allows change and therefore does not require the future extension to be blocked.", "slug": "open_closed_principle"}, {"falls_short_because": "Planning for change does not require a currently blocked extension.", "slug": "design_for_lifecycle_adaptability"}, {"falls_short_because": "The restructuring remedy can be used for reasons other than a blocked future extension.", "slug": "refactoring"}], "residual_id": "r:behavior_preserving_refactoring:b006_a14_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b006_a14_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A future extension is blocked by structure even though current behavior is acceptable. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A future extension is blocked by structure even though current behavior is acceptable."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A functioning extension surface allows change and therefore does not require the future extension to be blocked.", "slug": "open_closed_principle"}, {"falls_short_because": "Planning for change does not require a currently blocked extension.", "slug": "design_for_lifecycle_adaptability"}, {"falls_short_because": "The restructuring remedy can be used for reasons other than a blocked future extension.", "slug": "refactoring"}], "normalized_requirement": "Current internal structure blocks a future extension although current external behavior is acceptable.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Current internal structure blocks a future extension although current external behavior is acceptable.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The internal change is necessary while the governed external behavior remains a binding invariant.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The internal change is necessary while the governed external behavior remains a binding invariant.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P001-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must assess internal structure or implementation, not external behavior alone.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The object assessed by the evidence is the system's internals.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail evidentiary support for poor internal comprehensibility, not merely assert complexity without evidence.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The evidence shows that those internals are difficult to understand.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must use maintenance evidence as the basis for the comprehensibility finding.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The showing comes from maintenance evidence.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must use incident evidence as the basis for the comprehensibility finding.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The showing comes from incident evidence.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must use review evidence as the basis for the comprehensibility finding.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The showing comes from review evidence.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Maintenance, incident, or review evidence shows that internals are difficult to understand.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "operational evidence reveals poor internal comprehensibility", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P001-C12-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P001-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must assess internal structure or implementation, not external behavior alone.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The object assessed by the evidence is the system's internals.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail evidentiary support for poor internal verifiability, not merely assert complexity without evidence.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The evidence shows that those internals are difficult to verify.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must use maintenance evidence as the basis for the verifiability finding.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The showing comes from maintenance evidence.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must use incident evidence as the basis for the verifiability finding.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The showing comes from incident evidence.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must use review evidence as the basis for the verifiability finding.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The showing comes from review evidence.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Maintenance, incident, or review evidence shows that internals are difficult to verify.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "operational evidence reveals poor internal verifiability", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P001-C12-U2"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Removable complexity need not have produced maintenance evidence of difficult understanding or verification.", "slug": "accidental_vs_essential_complexity"}, {"falls_short_because": "Preventive work does not require the maintained internals to be difficult to understand or verify.", "slug": "maintenance"}, {"falls_short_because": "The remedy does not entail this particular diagnostic evidence.", "slug": "refactoring"}], "residual_id": "r:behavior_preserving_refactoring:b006_a14_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b006_a14_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Maintenance, incident, or review evidence shows that internals are hard to understand or verify. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Maintenance, incident, or review evidence shows that internals are hard to understand or verify."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PARTIALLY_DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_GUARDED_EQUIVALENT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A comments-as-deodorant instance can be diagnosed while editing rather than during maintenance, incident response, or review, leaving the source DNF unsatisfied; the code-review provenance guard excludes that case.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Comments as Deodorant", "one_liner": "Read the need for an explanatory comment as a diagnostic signal, not a virtue — a clear paragraph explaining a confusing function masks a retirable design problem instead of fixing it, so do the rename or split that retires the comment rather than maintaining it.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:comments_as_deodorant", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O5"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "comment_deodorant_diagnosed_in_code_review", "predicate": "The comment-as-deodorant diagnosis is established during a code review.", "rationale": "The qualifier selects only the named review-evidence provenance for an already complete comments-as-deodorant instance; it neither restates confusingness nor introduces another role or relation."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "comments_as_deodorant"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "comment_deodorant_diagnosed_in_code_review"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "comments_as_deodorant", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P001-C12-U1", "why_it_fits": "Both readers retained the same review-provenance branch in substance. The exact DSA supplies confusing internals and the diagnostic signal; one atomic branch-selection fact supplies O5, completing the review-evidence DNF branch without laundering the head."}], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 2, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 1, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Removable complexity need not have produced maintenance evidence of difficult understanding or verification.", "slug": "accidental_vs_essential_complexity"}, {"falls_short_because": "Preventive work does not require the maintained internals to be difficult to understand or verify.", "slug": "maintenance"}, {"falls_short_because": "The remedy does not entail this particular diagnostic evidence.", "slug": "refactoring"}], "normalized_requirement": "Maintenance, incident, or review evidence shows that internals are difficult to understand or verify.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "PARTIAL_EXISTING_DSA_GROUNDING", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation grounded 1 of 2 eligible atomic units; the remaining unit or units stayed open."}, "predicate": "Maintenance, incident, or review evidence shows that internals are difficult to understand or verify.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The internal change is necessary while the governed external behavior remains a binding invariant.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The internal change is necessary while the governed external behavior remains a binding invariant.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A replacement or migration is unnecessary because the external contract should remain unchanged.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Internal structure must be free to change enough to become simpler and more adaptable, while external behavior must remain constrained enough that users, contracts, and dependent systems do not absorb unapproved change. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: A replacement or migration is unnecessary because the external contract should remain unchanged. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A replacement or migration is unnecessary because the external contract should remain unchanged.", "Internal structure must be free to change enough to become simpler and more adaptable, while external behavior must remain constrained enough that users, contracts, and dependent systems do not absorb unapproved change."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "A replacement or migration is unnecessary because the external contract should remain unchanged."}, {"display_text": "A stable interface exists or can be made explicit enough to support equivalence testing.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: A stable interface exists or can be made explicit enough to support equivalence testing. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A stable interface exists or can be made explicit enough to support equivalence testing."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "A stable interface exists or can be made explicit enough to support equivalence testing."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 6, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-006", "ledger_sha256": "74e72b23b127c01c1de2db886d4a7bcfc127e5e3acafeaa5a618314e3721e004"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Belief Revision Workflow", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:belief_revision_workflow", "slug": "belief_revision_workflow"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 3, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 3 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is evidence without revision. A current belief continues to organize action even after it has been contradicted, weakened, narrowed, or made uncertain by new information.\n\nThis often happens because the belief is not written down clearly enough to challenge. People can then slide between different versions of it: the strong version before evidence arrives, the weaker version after evidence appears, and the retrospective claim that they “always meant” the weaker version. It also happens because revising the belief threatens competence or belonging. The result is an organization or decision process that sees evidence but does not metabolize it.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "New evidence conflicts with a current belief, but confirmation bias, cognitive dissonance, identity investment, or organizational face-saving prevents that evidence from changing confidence, scope, decision rationale, or action."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a posterior doxastic commitment with downstream action, defense, or propagation.", "role_mapping": "Doxastic commitment -> held belief; downstream action -> decision guidance.", "slug": "belief_formation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b006_a15_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A belief or assumption is actively guiding decisions. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A belief or assumption is actively guiding decisions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Belief Formation", "one_liner": "Commitment-transition by which an agent comes to hold a proposition as true and act accordingly.", "page_ref": "prime:belief_formation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Doxastic commitment -> held belief; downstream action -> decision guidance.", "slug": "belief_formation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a posterior doxastic commitment with downstream action, defense, or propagation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A held belief or assumption actively guides decisions or action.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Biased processing can occur without the disconfirming evidence meeting the atom's credibility threshold.", "slug": "confirmation_bias"}, {"falls_short_because": "A claim can be refutable in principle without any actual credible conflicting evidence.", "slug": "falsifiability"}, {"falls_short_because": "Independent evaluation evidence need not conflict with the belief being tested.", "slug": "holdout_set"}], "residual_id": "r:belief_revision_workflow:b006_a15_c2", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b006_a15_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Credible evidence conflicts with the belief. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Credible evidence conflicts with the belief."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Biased processing can occur without the disconfirming evidence meeting the atom's credibility threshold.", "slug": "confirmation_bias"}, {"falls_short_because": "A claim can be refutable in principle without any actual credible conflicting evidence.", "slug": "falsifiability"}, {"falls_short_because": "Independent evaluation evidence need not conflict with the belief being tested.", "slug": "holdout_set"}], "normalized_requirement": "Credible evidence conflicts with the action-guiding belief.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Credible evidence conflicts with the action-guiding belief.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires agreement to earn status and dissent to incur cost inside a belief community.", "role_mapping": "Revision away from shared belief -> dissent; reinforcement gradient -> social or identity cost.", "slug": "echo_chamber", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b006_a15_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Updating would impose social, identity, or action costs. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Updating would impose social, identity, or action costs."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Echo Chamber", "one_liner": "A bounded community whose input filter and internal reinforcement gradient amplify shared beliefs and strip out the corrective signal that would moderate them, while members experience the environment as complete rather than filtered.", "page_ref": "prime:echo_chamber", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Revision away from shared belief -> dissent; reinforcement gradient -> social or identity cost.", "slug": "echo_chamber", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires agreement to earn status and dissent to incur cost inside a belief community."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Updating the belief would impose social, identity, or action costs.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a posterior doxastic commitment with downstream action, defense, or propagation.", "role_mapping": "Doxastic commitment -> held belief; downstream action -> decision guidance.", "slug": "belief_formation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b006_a15_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A belief or assumption is actively guiding decisions. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A belief or assumption is actively guiding decisions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Belief Formation", "one_liner": "Commitment-transition by which an agent comes to hold a proposition as true and act accordingly.", "page_ref": "prime:belief_formation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Doxastic commitment -> held belief; downstream action -> decision guidance.", "slug": "belief_formation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a posterior doxastic commitment with downstream action, defense, or propagation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A held belief or assumption actively guides decisions or action.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Biased processing can occur without the disconfirming evidence meeting the atom's credibility threshold.", "slug": "confirmation_bias"}, {"falls_short_because": "A claim can be refutable in principle without any actual credible conflicting evidence.", "slug": "falsifiability"}, {"falls_short_because": "Independent evaluation evidence need not conflict with the belief being tested.", "slug": "holdout_set"}], "residual_id": "r:belief_revision_workflow:b006_a15_c2", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b006_a15_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Credible evidence conflicts with the belief. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Credible evidence conflicts with the belief."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Biased processing can occur without the disconfirming evidence meeting the atom's credibility threshold.", "slug": "confirmation_bias"}, {"falls_short_because": "A claim can be refutable in principle without any actual credible conflicting evidence.", "slug": "falsifiability"}, {"falls_short_because": "Independent evaluation evidence need not conflict with the belief being tested.", "slug": "holdout_set"}], "normalized_requirement": "Credible evidence conflicts with the action-guiding belief.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Credible evidence conflicts with the action-guiding belief.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a reinforcement gradient that rewards shared belief, penalizes dissent, and strips corrective signals.", "role_mapping": "Status for agreement -> consistency reward; corrective-signal stripping -> learning penalty.", "slug": "echo_chamber", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b006_a15_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The decision environment rewards consistency over learning. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The decision environment rewards consistency over learning."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Echo Chamber", "one_liner": "A bounded community whose input filter and internal reinforcement gradient amplify shared beliefs and strip out the corrective signal that would moderate them, while members experience the environment as complete rather than filtered.", "page_ref": "prime:echo_chamber", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Status for agreement -> consistency reward; corrective-signal stripping -> learning penalty.", "slug": "echo_chamber", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a reinforcement gradient that rewards shared belief, penalizes dissent, and strips corrective signals."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The decision environment rewards consistency with existing belief over learning from conflict.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a posterior doxastic commitment with downstream action, defense, or propagation.", "role_mapping": "Doxastic commitment -> held belief; downstream action -> decision guidance.", "slug": "belief_formation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b006_a15_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A belief or assumption is actively guiding decisions. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A belief or assumption is actively guiding decisions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Belief Formation", "one_liner": "Commitment-transition by which an agent comes to hold a proposition as true and act accordingly.", "page_ref": "prime:belief_formation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Doxastic commitment -> held belief; downstream action -> decision guidance.", "slug": "belief_formation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a posterior doxastic commitment with downstream action, defense, or propagation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A held belief or assumption actively guides decisions or action.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Biased processing can occur without the disconfirming evidence meeting the atom's credibility threshold.", "slug": "confirmation_bias"}, {"falls_short_because": "A claim can be refutable in principle without any actual credible conflicting evidence.", "slug": "falsifiability"}, {"falls_short_because": "Independent evaluation evidence need not conflict with the belief being tested.", "slug": "holdout_set"}], "residual_id": "r:belief_revision_workflow:b006_a15_c2", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b006_a15_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Credible evidence conflicts with the belief. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Credible evidence conflicts with the belief."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Biased processing can occur without the disconfirming evidence meeting the atom's credibility threshold.", "slug": "confirmation_bias"}, {"falls_short_because": "A claim can be refutable in principle without any actual credible conflicting evidence.", "slug": "falsifiability"}, {"falls_short_because": "Independent evaluation evidence need not conflict with the belief being tested.", "slug": "holdout_set"}], "normalized_requirement": "Credible evidence conflicts with the action-guiding belief.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Credible evidence conflicts with the action-guiding belief.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires biased assimilation and disconfirmation neglect that can reinterpret conflicting evidence to preserve a prior belief.", "role_mapping": "Prior belief -> old belief; biased assimilation -> narrowing, reinterpretation, or rationalization.", "slug": "confirmation_bias", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b006_a15_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The old belief can be quietly narrowed, reinterpreted, or rationalized. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The old belief can be quietly narrowed, reinterpreted, or rationalized."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Confirmation Bias", "one_liner": "Favor confirming evidence.", "page_ref": "prime:confirmation_bias", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Prior belief -> old belief; biased assimilation -> narrowing, reinterpretation, or rationalization.", "slug": "confirmation_bias", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires biased assimilation and disconfirmation neglect that can reinterpret conflicting evidence to preserve a prior belief."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The old belief can be preserved through narrowing, reinterpretation, or rationalization.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Future action depends on whether confidence changes.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "New evidence conflicts with a current belief, but confirmation bias, cognitive dissonance, identity investment, or organizational face-saving prevents that evidence from changing confidence, scope, decision rationale, or action. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: Future action depends on whether confidence changes. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Future action depends on whether confidence changes.", "New evidence conflicts with a current belief, but confirmation bias, cognitive dissonance, identity investment, or organizational face-saving prevents that evidence from changing confidence, scope, decision rationale, or action."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Future action depends on whether confidence changes."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 6, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-006", "ledger_sha256": "74e72b23b127c01c1de2db886d4a7bcfc127e5e3acafeaa5a618314e3721e004"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Beneficial Emergence Amplification", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:beneficial_emergence_amplification", "slug": "beneficial_emergence_amplification"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 5 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a mismatch between where learning occurs and where support decisions are made. Local actors discover something useful, but the larger system lacks a gentle way to notice, protect, and spread it. If the pattern remains invisible, the opportunity disappears. If the system seizes it too aggressively, the pattern may become a slogan, compliance checklist, or prestige contest rather than a living practice.\nThe hardest cases are those where the visible behavior is not the whole solution. A handoff ritual, community practice, or product adaptation may work because of trust, slack, informal judgment, timing, or a particular interaction medium. Amplification fails when it copies the surface and loses the substrate.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A beneficial pattern has emerged from distributed local interaction, but it remains fragile, invisible, under-resourced, isolated, or vulnerable to premature formalization. The system can miss the opportunity, smother it by overcontrol, or distort it by copying its visible surface while ignoring the conditions that make it work."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Emergence requires a novel macro-property from local interactions but does not require that the pattern be useful.", "slug": "emergence"}], "residual_id": "r:beneficial_emergence_amplification:b007_a01_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b007_a01_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A useful macro-pattern appears without being centrally designed, mandated, or fully understood. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A useful macro-pattern appears without being centrally designed, mandated, or fully understood."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Emergence requires a novel macro-property from local interactions but does not require that the pattern be useful.", "slug": "emergence"}], "normalized_requirement": "A useful macro-pattern has appeared without central design, mandate, or full causal understanding.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A useful macro-pattern has appeared without central design, mandate, or full causal understanding.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a higher-level pattern to be causally generated by lower-level local interactions without external insertion.", "role_mapping": "Lower-level constituents and local rules -> local actors and practices; emergent macro-property -> useful system pattern.", "slug": "emergence", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b007_a01_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The pattern is traceable to repeated local interactions, adaptations, norms, workarounds, contribution behaviors, or informal coordination. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The pattern is traceable to repeated local interactions, adaptations, norms, workarounds, contribution behaviors, or informal coordination."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Emergence", "one_liner": "Complex patterns from simple rules.", "page_ref": "prime:emergence", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Lower-level constituents and local rules -> local actors and practices; emergent macro-property -> useful system pattern.", "slug": "emergence", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a higher-level pattern to be causally generated by lower-level local interactions without external insertion."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Repeated local interactions generate the macro-pattern.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A strategic weak-signal watchlist need not concern a presently useful macro-pattern or tacit benefit evidence.", "slug": "weak_signals_emerging_issues"}], "residual_id": "r:beneficial_emergence_amplification:b007_a01_c3", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b007_a01_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The pattern shows credible benefit, but the evidence is still contextual, emerging, or partly tacit. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The pattern shows credible benefit, but the evidence is still contextual, emerging, or partly tacit."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A strategic weak-signal watchlist need not concern a presently useful macro-pattern or tacit benefit evidence.", "slug": "weak_signals_emerging_issues"}], "normalized_requirement": "Evidence of benefit remains contextual, emerging, or partly tacit.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Evidence of benefit remains contextual, emerging, or partly tacit.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Signal weakening over time does not require a useful locally generated practice or displacement by official process.", "slug": "fading"}], "residual_id": "r:beneficial_emergence_amplification:b007_a01_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b007_a01_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Leaving the pattern alone may cause it to dissipate, remain isolated, or be crowded out by official processes. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Leaving the pattern alone may cause it to dissipate, remain isolated, or be crowded out by official processes."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Signal weakening over time does not require a useful locally generated practice or displacement by official process.", "slug": "fading"}], "normalized_requirement": "Without support the useful pattern may dissipate, remain isolated, or be crowded out by official processes.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Without support the useful pattern may dissipate, remain isolated, or be crowded out by official processes.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P001-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must use formalization undertaken immediately as the causal operation, not formalization at an unspecified mature stage.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The causal operation is immediate formalization of the pattern or practice.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must type the threatened object as situated local decision judgment, not a generic adaptive capacity.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The protected object is local judgment used by the pattern or practice.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail the directed destructive consequence of immediate formalization for local judgment.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Immediate formalization would destroy the local judgment.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the 'would destroy' counterfactual and may not require that destruction has already occurred.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The destruction is counterfactual rather than asserted as already actual.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require local judgment to be necessary or load-bearing for the pattern, not optional.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The threatened local judgment is needed by the pattern or practice.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "Formalizing immediately would destroy needed local judgment.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "immediate formalization would destroy needed local judgment", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P001-C13-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P001-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must use formalization undertaken immediately as the causal operation, not formalization at an unspecified mature stage.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The causal operation is immediate formalization of the pattern or practice.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must type the threatened object as required context dependence, not a generic adaptive capacity or local judgment.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The protected object is the pattern's dependence on its particular context, a relation or property.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail the directed destructive consequence of immediate formalization for the required context relation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Immediate formalization would destroy the contextual dependence.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the 'would destroy' counterfactual and may not require that destruction has already occurred.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The destruction is counterfactual rather than asserted as already actual.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require the context relation to be necessary or load-bearing for the pattern, not optional.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The contextual dependence is needed by the pattern or practice.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "Formalizing immediately would destroy needed contextual dependence.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "immediate formalization would destroy needed contextual dependence", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P001-C13-U2"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P001-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must use formalization undertaken immediately as the causal operation, not formalization at an unspecified mature stage.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The causal operation is immediate formalization of the pattern or practice.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must type the threatened object as continuing adaptation, not a static context property or generic judgment.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The protected object is the pattern's ongoing adaptive process or capability.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail the directed destructive consequence of immediate formalization for the ongoing adaptive process.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Immediate formalization would destroy continuing adaptation.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the 'would destroy' counterfactual and may not require that destruction has already occurred.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The destruction is counterfactual rather than asserted as already actual.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require the ongoing adaptive process to be necessary or load-bearing for the pattern, not optional.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Continuing adaptation is needed by the pattern or practice.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "Formalizing immediately would destroy needed continuing adaptation.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "immediate formalization would destroy needed continuing adaptation", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P001-C13-U3"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Encoding a practice into explicit rules does not require that doing so is premature or adaptation-destroying.", "slug": "formalization"}], "residual_id": "r:beneficial_emergence_amplification:b007_a01_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b007_a01_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Immediate formalization would be premature because the pattern still depends on local judgment, conditions, or continuing adaptation. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Immediate formalization would be premature because the pattern still depends on local judgment, conditions, or continuing adaptation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 3, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 3}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Encoding a practice into explicit rules does not require that doing so is premature or adaptation-destroying.", "slug": "formalization"}], "normalized_requirement": "Formalizing immediately would destroy needed local judgment, contextual dependence, or continuing adaptation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 3 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Formalizing immediately would destroy needed local judgment, contextual dependence, or continuing adaptation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The system has channels for support, learning, diffusion, or replication that can be tuned without imposing total central control.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The structural problem is a mismatch between where learning occurs and where support decisions are made. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: The system has channels for support, learning, diffusion, or replication that can be tuned without imposing total central control. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The system has channels for support, learning, diffusion, or replication that can be tuned without imposing total central control.", "The structural problem is a mismatch between where learning occurs and where support decisions are made."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The system has channels for support, learning, diffusion, or replication that can be tuned without imposing total central control."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 7, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-007", "ledger_sha256": "0c8b91ca9f9d4f1ee832030c2225b334fa7ec1fac4a42fd2c3bc9fef1b116c7a"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Beneficial-Input Inversion Control", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:beneficial_input_inversion_control", "slug": "beneficial_input_inversion_control"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 6, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 6, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "6 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A bounded receiver is treated as if more of an enabling input is always helpful, even though its assimilation and clearance pathways are finite and the surplus can become a self-amplifying degrading load.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A bounded receiver is treated as if more of an enabling input is always helpful, even though its assimilation and clearance pathways are finite and the surplus can become a self-amplifying degrading load."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires an enabling input with a beneficial low-dose regime and a standing incentive to add more.", "role_mapping": "Enabling input -> growth/productivity/participation input; beneficial regime -> low or moderate loading.", "slug": "overshoot_and_collapse", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime requires a normally limiting input whose marginal product is positive at low dose.", "role_mapping": "Beneficial limiting input -> intervention input below the assimilation ceiling.", "slug": "eutrophication", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b007_a02_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: An input is genuinely beneficial at low or moderate levels, so stakeholders have learned to increase it when they want growth, productivity, participation, liquidity, learning, or throughput. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["An input is genuinely beneficial at low or moderate levels, so stakeholders have learned to increase it when they want growth, productivity, participation, liquidity, learning, or throughput."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Overshoot and Collapse", "one_liner": "An enabling input that is beneficial at low levels crosses an assimilation ceiling and inverts into a self-amplifying degrading load, depleting a secondary resource and locking in a hysteretic worse regime that does not reverse when the input is removed.", "page_ref": "prime:overshoot_and_collapse", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Enabling input -> growth/productivity/participation input; beneficial regime -> low or moderate loading.", "slug": "overshoot_and_collapse", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires an enabling input with a beneficial low-dose regime and a standing incentive to add more."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Eutrophication", "one_liner": "An enabling input crosses an assimilation ceiling and inverts into a degrading load, driving a self-amplifying bloom that depletes a secondary resource and locks in a worse regime.", "page_ref": "prime:eutrophication", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Beneficial limiting input -> intervention input below the assimilation ceiling.", "slug": "eutrophication", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a normally limiting input whose marginal product is positive at low dose."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The input has positive marginal value at low or moderate levels, creating a learned incentive to increase it.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a concrete finite assimilation ceiling separating useful absorption from surplus.", "role_mapping": "Assimilation bottleneck -> receiving-system ceiling.", "slug": "overshoot_and_collapse", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime requires an assimilation pathway with a bounded rate ceiling.", "role_mapping": "Assimilation pathway -> enumerated receiver capacity.", "slug": "eutrophication", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b007_a02_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The receiving system has a finite assimilation ceiling determined by uptake, processing, clearance, buffering, attention, trust, liquidity, oxygen, moderation, or recovery capacity. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The receiving system has a finite assimilation ceiling determined by uptake, processing, clearance, buffering, attention, trust, liquidity, oxygen, moderation, or recovery capacity."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Overshoot and Collapse", "one_liner": "An enabling input that is beneficial at low levels crosses an assimilation ceiling and inverts into a self-amplifying degrading load, depleting a secondary resource and locking in a hysteretic worse regime that does not reverse when the input is removed.", "page_ref": "prime:overshoot_and_collapse", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Assimilation bottleneck -> receiving-system ceiling.", "slug": "overshoot_and_collapse", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a concrete finite assimilation ceiling separating useful absorption from surplus."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Eutrophication", "one_liner": "An enabling input crosses an assimilation ceiling and inverts into a degrading load, driving a self-amplifying bloom that depletes a secondary resource and locks in a worse regime.", "page_ref": "prime:eutrophication", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Assimilation pathway -> enumerated receiver capacity.", "slug": "eutrophication", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires an assimilation pathway with a bounded rate ceiling."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The receiving system has a finite uptake, processing, clearance, buffering, attention, trust, liquidity, oxygen, moderation, or recovery ceiling.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires accumulated surplus above the ceiling, regardless of the loading route.", "role_mapping": "Surplus input -> ceiling-crossing pressure.", "slug": "overshoot_and_collapse", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime requires crossing the assimilation ceiling through excess input.", "role_mapping": "Ceiling crossing -> overload pathway.", "slug": "eutrophication", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime requires a sustained external loading rate acting on a bounded receiver with an absorption ceiling.", "role_mapping": "Sustained input rate -> one enumerated loading route; receiver ceiling -> assimilation ceiling.", "slug": "input_pressure", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b007_a02_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Input pressure can exceed that ceiling through sustained load, pulses, spatial concentration, diffuse aggregation, or delayed accumulation. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Input pressure can exceed that ceiling through sustained load, pulses, spatial concentration, diffuse aggregation, or delayed accumulation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Overshoot and Collapse", "one_liner": "An enabling input that is beneficial at low levels crosses an assimilation ceiling and inverts into a self-amplifying degrading load, depleting a secondary resource and locking in a hysteretic worse regime that does not reverse when the input is removed.", "page_ref": "prime:overshoot_and_collapse", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Surplus input -> ceiling-crossing pressure.", "slug": "overshoot_and_collapse", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires accumulated surplus above the ceiling, regardless of the loading route."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Eutrophication", "one_liner": "An enabling input crosses an assimilation ceiling and inverts into a degrading load, driving a self-amplifying bloom that depletes a secondary resource and locks in a worse regime.", "page_ref": "prime:eutrophication", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Ceiling crossing -> overload pathway.", "slug": "eutrophication", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires crossing the assimilation ceiling through excess input."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Input Pressure", "one_liner": "A sustained external input rate acts as the load variable a bounded receiving system must absorb or respond to.", "page_ref": "prime:input_pressure", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Sustained input rate -> one enumerated loading route; receiver ceiling -> assimilation ceiling.", "slug": "input_pressure", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a sustained external loading rate acting on a bounded receiver with an absorption ceiling."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Sustained, pulsed, concentrated, aggregated, or delayed input pressure can cross the ceiling.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires the surplus to become a self-amplifying degrading response.", "role_mapping": "Self-amplifying response -> rapid intermediate surge.", "slug": "overshoot_and_collapse", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime requires a self-amplifying bloom or flood of activity growing on the surplus.", "role_mapping": "Bloom -> intermediate surge.", "slug": "eutrophication", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b007_a02_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Surplus input favors a rapid intermediate process such as a bloom, exception backlog, spam wave, speculative boom, alert storm, or low-quality growth surge. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Surplus input favors a rapid intermediate process such as a bloom, exception backlog, spam wave, speculative boom, alert storm, or low-quality growth surge."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Overshoot and Collapse", "one_liner": "An enabling input that is beneficial at low levels crosses an assimilation ceiling and inverts into a self-amplifying degrading load, depleting a secondary resource and locking in a hysteretic worse regime that does not reverse when the input is removed.", "page_ref": "prime:overshoot_and_collapse", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Self-amplifying response -> rapid intermediate surge.", "slug": "overshoot_and_collapse", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires the surplus to become a self-amplifying degrading response."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Eutrophication", "one_liner": "An enabling input crosses an assimilation ceiling and inverts into a degrading load, driving a self-amplifying bloom that depletes a secondary resource and locks in a worse regime.", "page_ref": "prime:eutrophication", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Bloom -> intermediate surge.", "slug": "eutrophication", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a self-amplifying bloom or flood of activity growing on the surplus."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Surplus input drives a rapid, self-amplifying bloom, backlog, wave, boom, storm, or low-quality growth surge.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires the degrading response to deplete a secondary stock that actually supports the system.", "role_mapping": "Depleted secondary stock -> viability resource.", "slug": "overshoot_and_collapse", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime requires the bloom to consume a second resource faster than it replenishes.", "role_mapping": "Secondary depletion -> loss of viability support.", "slug": "eutrophication", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b007_a02_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The intermediate consumes a secondary resource that was supporting system viability. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The intermediate consumes a secondary resource that was supporting system viability."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Overshoot and Collapse", "one_liner": "An enabling input that is beneficial at low levels crosses an assimilation ceiling and inverts into a self-amplifying degrading load, depleting a secondary resource and locking in a hysteretic worse regime that does not reverse when the input is removed.", "page_ref": "prime:overshoot_and_collapse", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Depleted secondary stock -> viability resource.", "slug": "overshoot_and_collapse", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires the degrading response to deplete a secondary stock that actually supports the system."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Eutrophication", "one_liner": "An enabling input crosses an assimilation ceiling and inverts into a degrading load, driving a self-amplifying bloom that depletes a secondary resource and locks in a worse regime.", "page_ref": "prime:eutrophication", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Secondary depletion -> loss of viability support.", "slug": "eutrophication", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires the bloom to consume a second resource faster than it replenishes."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The intermediate consumes a secondary resource that supports system viability.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a hysteretic lock-in that survives removal of the excess input.", "role_mapping": "Hysteretic lock-in -> degraded regime.", "slug": "overshoot_and_collapse", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime requires a regime shift whose recovery needs direct work beyond reducing the input.", "role_mapping": "Worse stable regime -> hysteretic degraded state.", "slug": "eutrophication", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b007_a02_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The degraded state can become hysteretic, so recovery requires more than simply returning input to the old level. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The degraded state can become hysteretic, so recovery requires more than simply returning input to the old level."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Overshoot and Collapse", "one_liner": "An enabling input that is beneficial at low levels crosses an assimilation ceiling and inverts into a self-amplifying degrading load, depleting a secondary resource and locking in a hysteretic worse regime that does not reverse when the input is removed.", "page_ref": "prime:overshoot_and_collapse", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Hysteretic lock-in -> degraded regime.", "slug": "overshoot_and_collapse", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a hysteretic lock-in that survives removal of the excess input."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Eutrophication", "one_liner": "An enabling input crosses an assimilation ceiling and inverts into a degrading load, driving a self-amplifying bloom that depletes a secondary resource and locks in a worse regime.", "page_ref": "prime:eutrophication", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Worse stable regime -> hysteretic degraded state.", "slug": "eutrophication", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a regime shift whose recovery needs direct work beyond reducing the input."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The degraded regime is hysteretic and does not recover merely by returning input to the old level.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 7, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-007", "ledger_sha256": "0c8b91ca9f9d4f1ee832030c2225b334fa7ec1fac4a42fd2c3bc9fef1b116c7a"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Bias-Specific Decision Audit", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:bias_specific_decision_audit", "slug": "bias_specific_decision_audit"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Many organizations respond to bias risk with awareness training or long lists of cognitive biases. Those tools rarely change the structure of the decision. Reviewers may know that bias exists but still fail to identify the specific vulnerability in the current case.\n\nThe structural problem is a mismatch between broad bias awareness and concrete decision risk. A hiring decision, a diagnosis, a budget forecast, a strategic investment, and a policy rollout do not need the same checks. They differ in evidence channels, incentives, irreversibility, social pressure, affected parties, and known failure modes.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A consequential decision is exposed to predictable distortion pathways, but the review process is absent, generic, too late, or detached from the actual decision structure."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Exposure to uncertain loss does not require a high-stakes decision with durable consequences.", "slug": "risk"}], "residual_id": "r:bias_specific_decision_audit:b007_a03_c1", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b007_a03_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The decision has high stakes or durable consequences. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The decision has high stakes or durable consequences."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Exposure to uncertain loss does not require a high-stakes decision with durable consequences.", "slug": "risk"}], "normalized_requirement": "The decision has high stakes or durable consequences.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The decision has high stakes or durable consequences.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Confirmation bias can occur outside a decision type and does not establish a known recurring vulnerability of this process.", "slug": "confirmation_bias"}, {"falls_short_because": "Omission bias does not by itself establish that this decision type predictably exhibits it.", "slug": "omission_bias"}], "residual_id": "r:bias_specific_decision_audit:b007_a03_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b007_a03_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The decision type has known recurring bias vulnerabilities. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The decision type has known recurring bias vulnerabilities."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Confirmation bias can occur outside a decision type and does not establish a known recurring vulnerability of this process.", "slug": "confirmation_bias"}, {"falls_short_because": "Omission bias does not by itself establish that this decision type predictably exhibits it.", "slug": "omission_bias"}], "normalized_requirement": "The decision type has a known recurring vulnerability to one or more named cognitive or procedural biases.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The decision type has a known recurring vulnerability to one or more named cognitive or procedural biases.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P001-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern an existing review process, not a future audit remedy or the underlying decision alone.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The evaluated process is the current review process.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail failure of the review to test or respond to the relevant bias mechanism.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The current review is insensitive to the bias mechanism it is meant to address.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve that the currently operative review has the deficiency.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The deficient review is current rather than merely proposed or historical.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require mechanism-specific sensitivity to the named bias, not generic review quality.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The sensitivity target is the specifically named bias mechanism.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Current review is generic, checklist-performative, or otherwise insensitive to the named bias mechanism.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "current review is insensitive to the named bias mechanism", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P001-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Targeted information-channel severance is a possible audit control, not evidence that current review is generic or performative.", "slug": "blinding"}], "residual_id": "r:bias_specific_decision_audit:b007_a03_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b007_a03_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Review is currently generic or performative. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Review is currently generic or performative."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Targeted information-channel severance is a possible audit control, not evidence that current review is generic or performative.", "slug": "blinding"}], "normalized_requirement": "Current review is generic, checklist-performative, or otherwise insensitive to the named bias mechanism.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Current review is generic, checklist-performative, or otherwise insensitive to the named bias mechanism.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "A named bias mechanism has a plausible causal path into this decision and existing review does not interrupt that path.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A named bias mechanism has a plausible causal path into this decision and existing review does not interrupt that path.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The decision process can still change.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Those tools rarely change the structure of the decision. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: The decision process can still change. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The decision process can still change.", "Those tools rarely change the structure of the decision."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The decision process can still change."}, {"display_text": "The audit burden can be kept proportionate.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this deployment constraint: The audit burden can be kept proportionate. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The audit burden can be kept proportionate."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The audit burden can be kept proportionate."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 7, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-007", "ledger_sha256": "0c8b91ca9f9d4f1ee832030c2225b334fa7ec1fac4a42fd2c3bc9fef1b116c7a"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Bidirectional Conceptual Translation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:bidirectional_conceptual_translation", "slug": "bidirectional_conceptual_translation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 2, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 2 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Frameworks are not bags of labels. They organize observations into categories, relate those categories to causes and obligations, define what counts as evidence, and make some distinctions salient while leaving others unmarked. A term can be lexically similar and structurally different: it may cover different cases, imply a different level of certainty, authorize a different actor, or trigger a different remedy. Conversely, an important source distinction may require a phrase, example set, diagram, or retained native term because the target framework has no compact slot for it.\n\nCoordination pressure pushes toward a neat common vocabulary. Fidelity pushes toward context, qualifications, parallel representations, and visible residual difference. When simplicity wins invisibly, one framework commonly becomes the default. Its categories appear neutral, while the other side bears the cognitive burden of adaptation and loses the ability to contest how it has been represented. Translation then becomes an authority transfer as well as a semantic operation.\n\nSeveral diagnostic signatures distinguish the structural problem. Same-word disputes recur despite apparent agreement. A one-to-many relation is published as one-to-one. Users pass a vocabulary quiz but classify cases or choose actions differently. Back-translation reconstructs the sentence while changing the rule, risk threshold, or entitlement. Exceptions disappear when policy becomes software. Community terms are treated as colorful synonyms rather than knowledge-bearing categories. An analogy travels farther than its causal structure permits. These are not isolated wording errors; they reveal an unmanaged bridge.\n\nThe central risk is false equivalence, but refusing every bridge is not a solution. Groups still need to communicate, coordinate, learn, and decide. The archetype therefore creates enough shared structure for action while making the boundary of that shared structure inspectable.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Actors must coordinate across frameworks whose categories, assumptions, evidence rules, values, or practical consequences do not align. Literal substitution creates false equivalence, omission, category flattening, or authority distortion, yet leaving the frameworks disconnected prevents action."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires conversion between distinct or incommensurable source and target frameworks.", "role_mapping": "Source and target frameworks -> groups' conceptual schemes; shared translation object -> decision.", "slug": "translation_and_conceptual_bridging", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b007_a04_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Two groups use different conceptual schemes for the same decision. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Two groups use different conceptual schemes for the same decision"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Translation and Conceptual Bridging", "one_liner": "Convert concepts or meanings between incommensurable frameworks.", "page_ref": "prime:translation_and_conceptual_bridging", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source and target frameworks -> groups' conceptual schemes; shared translation object -> decision.", "slug": "translation_and_conceptual_bridging", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires conversion between distinct or incommensurable source and target frameworks."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Two groups use different conceptual frameworks for the same decision.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime explicitly excludes word substitution and requires managed loss where direct equivalents fail.", "role_mapping": "No direct word equivalent -> missing conceptual counterpart.", "slug": "translation_and_conceptual_bridging", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b007_a04_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A term has no direct counterpart. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A term has no direct counterpart"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Translation and Conceptual Bridging", "one_liner": "Convert concepts or meanings between incommensurable frameworks.", "page_ref": "prime:translation_and_conceptual_bridging", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "No direct word equivalent -> missing conceptual counterpart.", "slug": "translation_and_conceptual_bridging", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime explicitly excludes word substitution and requires managed loss where direct equivalents fail."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A relevant term or concept lacks a direct counterpart in the other framework.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Conceptual translation can be consequence-neutral and need not change rights, risk, or resource allocation.", "slug": "translation_and_conceptual_bridging"}], "residual_id": "r:bidirectional_conceptual_translation:b007_a04_c4", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b007_a04_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Translation changes rights risks or resource allocation. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Translation changes rights risks or resource allocation"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Conceptual translation can be consequence-neutral and need not change rights, risk, or resource allocation.", "slug": "translation_and_conceptual_bridging"}], "normalized_requirement": "Translation choices alter rights, risks, or resource allocation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Translation choices alter rights, risks, or resource allocation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P001-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must use clarification or reinterpretation activity as the blocking source, not generic communication volume.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The blocking activity is conceptual mediation through clarification or reinterpretation.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must map the affected outcome to cross-group coordination, not within-group understanding alone.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The blocked target is coordination across groups.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail the directed blocking relation from mediation activity to coordination.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The conceptual-mediation activity blocks cross-group coordination.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require recurrence, not a single isolated clarification or reinterpretation.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The clarification or reinterpretation activity is repeated.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve current blockage rather than only a historical or hypothetical possibility.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The blocking relation is currently operative.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the cross-group domain limit.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The coordination relation crosses group boundaries.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must identify repeated clarification as the blocking activity.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The repeated blocking activity is clarification.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must identify repeated reinterpretation as the blocking activity.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The repeated blocking activity is reinterpretation.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Repeated clarification or reinterpretation currently blocks cross-group coordination.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "recurrent conceptual mediation blocks cross-group coordination", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P001-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Incompatible models surface at a forcing event but need not cause repeated clarification or reinterpretation.", "slug": "inconsistent_shared_model"}], "residual_id": "r:bidirectional_conceptual_translation:b007_a04_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b007_a04_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Repeated clarification or reinterpretation blocks coordination. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Repeated clarification or reinterpretation blocks coordination"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Incompatible models surface at a forcing event but need not cause repeated clarification or reinterpretation.", "slug": "inconsistent_shared_model"}], "normalized_requirement": "Repeated clarification or reinterpretation currently blocks cross-group coordination.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Repeated clarification or reinterpretation currently blocks cross-group coordination.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires conversion between distinct or incommensurable source and target frameworks.", "role_mapping": "Source and target frameworks -> groups' conceptual schemes; shared translation object -> decision.", "slug": "translation_and_conceptual_bridging", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b007_a04_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Two groups use different conceptual schemes for the same decision. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Two groups use different conceptual schemes for the same decision"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Translation and Conceptual Bridging", "one_liner": "Convert concepts or meanings between incommensurable frameworks.", "page_ref": "prime:translation_and_conceptual_bridging", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source and target frameworks -> groups' conceptual schemes; shared translation object -> decision.", "slug": "translation_and_conceptual_bridging", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires conversion between distinct or incommensurable source and target frameworks."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Two groups use different conceptual frameworks for the same decision.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires mapping concepts across domain boundaries while preserving structural invariants.", "role_mapping": "Source concept/model -> cross-domain model; invariant preservation -> retained commitments.", "slug": "translation_and_conceptual_bridging", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b007_a04_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A cross-domain model must be transferred. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A cross-domain model must be transferred"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Translation and Conceptual Bridging", "one_liner": "Convert concepts or meanings between incommensurable frameworks.", "page_ref": "prime:translation_and_conceptual_bridging", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source concept/model -> cross-domain model; invariant preservation -> retained commitments.", "slug": "translation_and_conceptual_bridging", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires mapping concepts across domain boundaries while preserving structural invariants."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A model must be transferred across domain or framework boundaries while preserving its structural commitments.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Conceptual translation can be consequence-neutral and need not change rights, risk, or resource allocation.", "slug": "translation_and_conceptual_bridging"}], "residual_id": "r:bidirectional_conceptual_translation:b007_a04_c4", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b007_a04_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Translation changes rights risks or resource allocation. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Translation changes rights risks or resource allocation"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Conceptual translation can be consequence-neutral and need not change rights, risk, or resource allocation.", "slug": "translation_and_conceptual_bridging"}], "normalized_requirement": "Translation choices alter rights, risks, or resource allocation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Translation choices alter rights, risks, or resource allocation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P001-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must use clarification or reinterpretation activity as the blocking source, not generic communication volume.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The blocking activity is conceptual mediation through clarification or reinterpretation.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must map the affected outcome to cross-group coordination, not within-group understanding alone.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The blocked target is coordination across groups.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail the directed blocking relation from mediation activity to coordination.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The conceptual-mediation activity blocks cross-group coordination.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require recurrence, not a single isolated clarification or reinterpretation.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The clarification or reinterpretation activity is repeated.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve current blockage rather than only a historical or hypothetical possibility.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The blocking relation is currently operative.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the cross-group domain limit.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The coordination relation crosses group boundaries.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must identify repeated clarification as the blocking activity.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The repeated blocking activity is clarification.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must identify repeated reinterpretation as the blocking activity.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The repeated blocking activity is reinterpretation.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Repeated clarification or reinterpretation currently blocks cross-group coordination.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "recurrent conceptual mediation blocks cross-group coordination", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P001-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Incompatible models surface at a forcing event but need not cause repeated clarification or reinterpretation.", "slug": "inconsistent_shared_model"}], "residual_id": "r:bidirectional_conceptual_translation:b007_a04_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b007_a04_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Repeated clarification or reinterpretation blocks coordination. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Repeated clarification or reinterpretation blocks coordination"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Incompatible models surface at a forcing event but need not cause repeated clarification or reinterpretation.", "slug": "inconsistent_shared_model"}], "normalized_requirement": "Repeated clarification or reinterpretation currently blocks cross-group coordination.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Repeated clarification or reinterpretation currently blocks cross-group coordination.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 7, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-007", "ledger_sha256": "0c8b91ca9f9d4f1ee832030c2225b334fa7ec1fac4a42fd2c3bc9fef1b116c7a"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Bidirectional Consistency Mapping", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:bidirectional_consistency_mapping", "slug": "bidirectional_consistency_mapping"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 7, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 3, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "7 of 7 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 7}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem begins with two kinds of autonomy. Representational autonomy means A and B use different schemas, units, categories, aggregation, or local fields because each serves a different task. Operational autonomy means each side can continue changing through different users, devices, institutions, or workflows. The system nevertheless needs a stable relation between them.\n\nNaive synchronization hides this tension under transport. A connector moves a field, but it does not know whether the field is authoritative, derived, lossy, provisional, local-only, or rights-affecting. Running the connector in reverse doubles the ambiguity. Timestamps and last-write-wins produce apparent resolution while erasing intent and depending on clock and delivery assumptions.\n\nThe most characteristic failures are circular. Propagation creates another observation, the observation triggers reverse propagation, normalization changes the value, and the pair oscillates. Other failures are silent: a many-to-one category cannot be reconstructed, a stale update overwrites a newer local change, a retry duplicates an external effect, or a deletion is forgotten and later resurrected.\n\nThe intervention makes correspondence semantic rather than merely operational. It states what relation should hold, which differences are legitimate, how changes carry origin and version, what conflict means, and which evidence establishes an acceptable fixed point.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Two records, models, systems, views, ledgers, plans, or physical/digital representations are expected to remain corresponding while either side can change. Their schemas, timing, precision, authority, and local rules differ. Naive two-way copying creates update loops, stale overwrite, duplicate effects, loss of fields that have no reverse representation, competing edits, ambiguous deletion, and false agreement. One side may appear synchronized even though the semantic relation has drifted or the mapping changed."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires multiple replicas of shared state that accept uncoordinated local writes.", "role_mapping": "Replicas -> representations; local writes -> legitimate local updates.", "slug": "eventual_consistency", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b007_a05_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Both representations accept legitimate local updates. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Both representations accept legitimate local updates."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Eventual Consistency", "one_liner": "Distributed copies of shared state are allowed to diverge under local updates, with a deterministic merge guaranteeing they reconverge once updates stop.", "page_ref": "prime:eventual_consistency", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Replicas -> representations; local writes -> legitimate local updates.", "slug": "eventual_consistency", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires multiple replicas of shared state that accept uncoordinated local writes."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Multiple representations of shared state accept legitimate uncoordinated local updates.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires propagation plus a bounded staleness window during permitted divergence.", "role_mapping": "Propagation channel -> cross-representation reflection; staleness window -> bounded delay.", "slug": "eventual_consistency", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b007_a05_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Changes must be reflected across the relation within a bounded delay or before consequential action. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Changes must be reflected across the relation within a bounded delay or before consequential action."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Eventual Consistency", "one_liner": "Distributed copies of shared state are allowed to diverge under local updates, with a deterministic merge guaranteeing they reconverge once updates stop.", "page_ref": "prime:eventual_consistency", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Propagation channel -> cross-representation reflection; staleness window -> bounded delay.", "slug": "eventual_consistency", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires propagation plus a bounded staleness window during permitted divergence."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Changes must propagate across the relation within a bounded staleness window or before consequential action.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a forward mapping and a distinct reversed-arrow operation that returns all inputs compatible with a target output.", "role_mapping": "Forward map -> forward representation mapping; reversed arrow -> reverse mapping.", "slug": "preimage", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b007_a05_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Forward and reverse mappings are not trivially identical. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Forward and reverse mappings are not trivially identical."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Preimage", "one_liner": "The set of all inputs that map to a given output under some mapping.", "page_ref": "prime:preimage", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Forward map -> forward representation mapping; reversed arrow -> reverse mapping.", "slug": "preimage", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a forward mapping and a distinct reversed-arrow operation that returns all inputs compatible with a target output."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Forward and reverse mappings are structurally distinct rather than trivially identical.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P002-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require mapped information, not merely an arbitrary object or signal.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The affected entity is information represented in a mapping.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must place the limitation in a representation-to-representation mapping context.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The limitation holds across the mapping between representations.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail existence of affected information; mere possibility is insufficient.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "At least some mapped information has the limitation.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require actual information loss across the mapping.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A complete branch is that information is lost by the mapping.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require information local to one representation with no corresponding mapped value on the other.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "A complete branch is that information exists only on one mapping side.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require inability to recover the relevant information by reversing the mapping.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "A complete branch is that the mapping is noninvertible for the information.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Some information is lossy, local-only, or noninvertible across the mapping.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A mapping contains information that cannot be preserved symmetrically and reversibly across its sides.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P002-C01-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A preimage may be a singleton and does not require actual information loss or local-only state.", "slug": "preimage"}, {"falls_short_because": "Deterministic signal-preserving deviation is in principle invertible and excludes loss by definition.", "slug": "distortion"}], "residual_id": "r:bidirectional_consistency_mapping:b007_a05_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b007_a05_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Some information is lossy, local-only, or noninvertible. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Some information is lossy, local-only, or noninvertible."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Tried a close match with no lost distinction; that is excluded because the record requires incomplete interchangeability and some context in which substitution distorts.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Near-equivalence Mapping", "one_liner": "Bridge two concepts in different controlled vocabularies with a declared correspondence that carries an explicit, typed loss-risk on the bridge itself, so consumers can route each substitution on whether their use falls in the safe zone.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:near_equivalence_mapping", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "near_equivalence_mapping"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "near_equivalence_mapping", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P002-C01-U1", "why_it_fits": "Authoritative necessity review confirms a complete DNF branch is entailed without qualification. One complete DNF branch is directly entailed by every exact-record instance; no context fact or interpretive bridge is required."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "An exactMatch instance loses no information, so the generic schema mapping cannot be retained without selecting a lossy grade.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Schema Mapping Relation", "one_liner": "Bridge two independently governed classification schemes with an explicit, typed assertion — source concept, target concept, and a fidelity grade (exact / close / broader / narrower / related) — so consumers know exactly what the bridge guarantees without merging the schemes.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:schema_mapping_relation", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O3", "O4"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "correspondence_type_broad_match", "predicate": "The correspondence type on this mapping is broadMatch.", "rationale": "The retained context guard is anchored in a named exact-record role or branch, is a single atomic fact, and leaves no complete guarded instance that falsifies the selected DNF branch."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "schema_mapping_relation"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "correspondence_type_broad_match"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "schema_mapping_relation", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P002-C01-U1", "why_it_fits": "Authoritative necessity review confirms the exact candidate supplies the structural spine and the retained single atomic context guard fills all remaining obligations in one complete DNF branch. Selecting the candidate's own broadMatch grade makes actual specificity loss necessary under one atomic branch-selection qualifier."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A handoff whose receiver reconstruction preserves all load-bearing sender state is not handoff loss, so the loss branch cannot be falsified.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Handoff Loss", "one_liner": "Locate post-transition failures at the transfer relation itself: work crossing a boundary between actors arrives degraded because a bounded artifact cannot carry the sender's tacit state, so downstream decisions run on an impoverished reconstruction.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:handoff_loss", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "handoff_loss"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "handoff_loss", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P002-C01-U1", "why_it_fits": "Authoritative necessity review confirms a complete DNF branch is entailed without qualification. Every handoff-loss instance contains actual state-bearing information that fails to survive the boundary encoding, directly satisfying the information-loss branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A transformed layout that preserves every encoded relation is not responsive-layout breakage, so no complete candidate instance escapes the loss obligation.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Responsive-Layout Breakage", "one_liner": "Diagnose the silent UI failure where an interface's content survives a viewport, device, or locale transformation but its layout-encoded meaning — priority, adjacency, hierarchy, above-the-fold prominence — is lost, so a passing content-accessibility check actively conceals the defect.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:responsive_layout_breakage", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "responsive_layout_breakage"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "responsive_layout_breakage", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P002-C01-U1", "why_it_fits": "Authoritative necessity review confirms a complete DNF branch is entailed without qualification. Every complete responsive-layout-breakage instance entails that some layout-encoded meaning is actually lost under a representation transformation, satisfying the loss branch directly."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Some information is lossy, local-only, or noninvertible across the mapping.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires permitted replica divergence under concurrent local updates and delayed propagation.", "role_mapping": "Concurrent updates and propagation delay -> temporary divergence.", "slug": "eventual_consistency", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b007_a05_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Concurrent changes or delayed delivery are possible. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Concurrent changes or delayed delivery are possible."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Eventual Consistency", "one_liner": "Distributed copies of shared state are allowed to diverge under local updates, with a deterministic merge guaranteeing they reconverge once updates stop.", "page_ref": "prime:eventual_consistency", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Concurrent updates and propagation delay -> temporary divergence.", "slug": "eventual_consistency", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires permitted replica divergence under concurrent local updates and delayed propagation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Concurrent updates or delayed delivery can create temporary divergence.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P002-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern a state whose absence, removal, or invalidation changes system behavior.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The source role is an operative negative or removal state in one representation.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include a counterpart representation that receives the state semantics.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The destination role is the corresponding representation across the mapping.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail that the state changes validity, presence, permission, or downstream operation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The state has operative rather than merely descriptive meaning.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must make counterpart propagation necessary, not optional or merely possible.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The operative meaning must propagate to the counterpart.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require deletion semantics to propagate.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "A complete branch uses deletion as the operative state.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require revocation semantics to propagate.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "A complete branch uses revocation as the operative state.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require explicitly represented absence semantics to propagate.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "A complete branch uses represented absence as the operative state.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Deletion, revocation, or represented absence has operative meaning that must propagate to the corresponding representation.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An operative negative-state semantic must propagate between corresponding representations.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P002-C02-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Comparing and correcting records does not require tombstone, revocation, or meaningful-absence semantics.", "slug": "record_reconciliation"}], "residual_id": "r:bidirectional_consistency_mapping:b007_a05_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b007_a05_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Deletion, revocation, or absence has meaning. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Deletion, revocation, or absence has meaning."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_GUARDED_EQUIVALENT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A strongly consistent store whose latest write is an insertion satisfies the DSA but no negative-state branch.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Strong Consistency", "one_liner": "Guarantee that every read of a replicated store reflects the most recently completed write and all clients see one real-time-consistent total order (linearizability), so the system can be reasoned about as a single copy — bought with a coordination round and partition-time unavailability.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:strong_consistency", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1", "O3", "O5"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "latest_write_operative_deletion", "predicate": "The most recently completed write is an operative deletion.", "rationale": "The retained context guard is anchored in a named exact-record role or branch, is a single atomic fact, and leaves no complete guarded instance that falsifies the selected DNF branch."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "strong_consistency"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "latest_write_operative_deletion"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "strong_consistency", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P002-C02-U1", "why_it_fits": "Authoritative necessity review confirms the exact candidate supplies the structural spine and the retained single atomic context guard fills all remaining obligations in one complete DNF branch. The consistency guarantee makes the latest write's operative semantics visible across replicas; one branch-selection fact types that write as deletion."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Deletion, revocation, or represented absence has operative meaning that must propagate.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P002-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern rules or authority of a representation mapping, not unrelated organizational change.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The changing regime governs a mapping between representations.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must allow the governing element to change rather than requiring it to remain fixed.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Evolution of the governing element is possible.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail temporal change, not merely coexistence of multiple rules or authorities.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The asserted relation is evolution over time.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require the transformation or correspondence rules themselves to evolve.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A complete branch is evolution of the mapping rules.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require change in who or what may update at least one mapping side.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "A complete branch is evolution of authority to update either representation.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "The mapping rules or the authority to update either representation can evolve.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A bidirectional representation regime can change through its mapping rules or update authority.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P002-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A moving input-output relationship does not require an evolving bidirectional mapping or update authority.", "slug": "concept_drift"}], "residual_id": "r:bidirectional_consistency_mapping:b007_a05_c7", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b007_a05_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Mapping or authority can evolve. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Mapping or authority can evolve."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A declaration with no possible version, downgrade, or retraction path would violate the candidate's exact versioned and revocable lifecycle.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Declared Equivalence Mapping", "one_liner": "An explicit, authoritative, versioned assertion that two concepts from different vocabularies are interchangeable for stated purposes — collapsing a cross-scheme distinction to zero for consumers who trust the declaration rather than re-verifying at use-time.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:declared_equivalence_mapping", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "declared_equivalence_mapping"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "declared_equivalence_mapping", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P002-C03-U1", "why_it_fits": "Authoritative necessity review confirms a complete DNF branch is entailed without qualification. Every exact declared-equivalence mapping is versioned and revocable through a lifecycle that can downgrade or retract the mapping rule, directly satisfying the rule-evolution branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A frozen ungoverned lookup table with no changelog or lifecycle is expressly excluded from the candidate.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Schema Mapping Relation", "one_liner": "Bridge two independently governed classification schemes with an explicit, typed assertion — source concept, target concept, and a fidelity grade (exact / close / broader / narrower / related) — so consumers know exactly what the bridge guarantees without merging the schemes.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:schema_mapping_relation", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "schema_mapping_relation"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "schema_mapping_relation", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P002-C03-U1", "why_it_fits": "Authoritative necessity review confirms a complete DNF branch is entailed without qualification. Every schema-mapping relation is an explicitly versioned, revocable, maintained artifact with assert-review-deprecate-replace lifecycle, directly satisfying rule evolution."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Tried mapping-rule resources satisfying replacement without temporal evolution; distinct successor takeover and predecessor obsolescence necessarily constitute temporal rule evolution.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Replacement Relation", "one_liner": "Record that a distinct successor resource takes over a predecessor's canonical standing and flags it obsolete, as a bidirectional machine-routable link, so consumers read currency off the chain rather than inspecting the artifacts themselves.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:replacement_relation", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1", "O4"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "resources_are_mapping_rules", "predicate": "The predecessor and successor resources are mapping rules.", "rationale": "The retained context guard is anchored in a named exact-record role or branch, is a single atomic fact, and leaves no complete guarded instance that falsifies the selected DNF branch."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "replacement_relation"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "resources_are_mapping_rules"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "replacement_relation", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P002-C03-U1", "why_it_fits": "Authoritative necessity review confirms the exact candidate supplies the structural spine and the retained single atomic context guard fills all remaining obligations in one complete DNF branch. The exact record supplies the structural spine and one atomic, candidate-anchored contingent fact fills every gap in one complete DNF branch without adding a role or second relation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The mapping rules or authority to update either representation can evolve.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 7, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-007", "ledger_sha256": "0c8b91ca9f9d4f1ee832030c2225b334fa7ec1fac4a42fd2c3bc9fef1b116c7a"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Bioaccumulation Prevention", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:bioaccumulation_prevention", "slug": "bioaccumulation_prevention"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a mismatch between event-level approval and stock-level harm. Each new input may be small enough to approve, but the reservoir remembers. Technical shortcuts remain in a codebase, fatigue remains in a team, exceptions remain in governance, pollutants remain in an environment, stale access remains in systems, and trust loss remains in an audience.\n\nBecause the stock is hidden or slow-moving, the system discovers the problem late. At that point, the relevant intervention is often no longer a small adjustment; it is cleanup, repair, repayment, containment, or crisis recovery.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system stores, retains, or concentrates repeated inputs while ordinary decision logic treats those inputs as transient. Because the accumulating stock is hidden, distributed, or slow to show symptoms, the organization keeps adding burden until delayed harm, toxicity, overload, debt, or fragility becomes difficult to reverse."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires uptake to exceed elimination so concentration rises over time in a receiving compartment.", "role_mapping": "Substance uptake -> added input; organism or tissue -> reservoir; elimination rate -> clearance.", "slug": "bioaccumulation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime requires opportunistic material to accumulate at an interface whenever deposition exceeds active removal.", "role_mapping": "Depositing matter -> input; interface -> reservoir; removal rate -> clearance.", "slug": "biofouling", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b007_a06_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Inputs persist after they are added instead of clearing immediately. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Inputs persist after they are added instead of clearing immediately."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Bioaccumulation", "one_liner": "Progressive concentration.", "page_ref": "prime:bioaccumulation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Substance uptake -> added input; organism or tissue -> reservoir; elimination rate -> clearance.", "slug": "bioaccumulation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires uptake to exceed elimination so concentration rises over time in a receiving compartment."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Biofouling", "one_liner": "Opportunistic matter accumulates at a working interface, charging a cost for occupation, not activity.", "page_ref": "prime:biofouling", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Depositing matter -> input; interface -> reservoir; removal rate -> clearance.", "slug": "biofouling", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires opportunistic material to accumulate at an interface whenever deposition exceeds active removal."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Added inputs are retained and progressively concentrate because clearance is slow or incomplete.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P002-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must type the observation channel as event-level monitoring rather than stock-level accounting.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The observer is an ordinary event-level monitoring process.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern a retained stock or load accumulated beyond individual events.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The observed object is an accumulated retained load.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail non-observability through the stated channel, not merely noisy or delayed observation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The monitoring process fails to reveal the retained-load state.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve lack of visibility into where the retained load resides.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The retained load's location is not revealed.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve lack of visibility into who owns or bears the retained load.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The retained load's owner is not revealed.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve lack of visibility into the amount of retained load.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The retained load's magnitude is not revealed.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Ordinary event-level monitoring does not reveal the location, owner, or magnitude of retained load.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Event-level monitoring is blind to the state of an accumulated retained load.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P002-C04-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Sequential reporting loss hides events, not a retained stock accumulated across events.", "slug": "reporting_pyramid_undercount"}], "residual_id": "r:bioaccumulation_prevention:b007_a06_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b007_a06_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The location, owner, or magnitude of retained load is not visible in ordinary event-level monitoring. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The location, owner, or magnitude of retained load is not visible in ordinary event-level monitoring."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Sequential reporting loss hides events, not a retained stock accumulated across events.", "slug": "reporting_pyramid_undercount"}], "normalized_requirement": "Ordinary event-level monitoring does not reveal the location, owner, or magnitude of retained load.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Ordinary event-level monitoring does not reveal the location, owner, or magnitude of retained load.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires threshold-nonlinear performance degradation caused by accumulated occupation of a working interface.", "role_mapping": "Interface occupation -> retained load; nonlinear degradation -> delayed harmful effect.", "slug": "biofouling", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b007_a06_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The harmful effect appears after accumulation, concentration, interaction, or loss of clearance rather than after a single acute input. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The harmful effect appears after accumulation, concentration, interaction, or loss of clearance rather than after a single acute input."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Biofouling", "one_liner": "Opportunistic matter accumulates at a working interface, charging a cost for occupation, not activity.", "page_ref": "prime:biofouling", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Interface occupation -> retained load; nonlinear degradation -> delayed harmful effect.", "slug": "biofouling", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires threshold-nonlinear performance degradation caused by accumulated occupation of a working interface."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Harm appears only after accumulated occupation, concentration, interaction, or clearance loss crosses a threshold.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a body or compartment in which concentration is retained over time.", "role_mapping": "Body or tissue -> load-retaining reservoir.", "slug": "bioaccumulation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime requires a working interface that retains deposits until active removal.", "role_mapping": "Working interface -> load-retaining reservoir.", "slug": "biofouling", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b007_a06_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: There are credible reservoirs: environments, bodies, teams, backlogs, ledgers, codebases, risk registers, attention channels, relationships, or institutional memory. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["There are credible reservoirs: environments, bodies, teams, backlogs, ledgers, codebases, risk registers, attention channels, relationships, or institutional memory."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Bioaccumulation", "one_liner": "Progressive concentration.", "page_ref": "prime:bioaccumulation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Body or tissue -> load-retaining reservoir.", "slug": "bioaccumulation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a body or compartment in which concentration is retained over time."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Biofouling", "one_liner": "Opportunistic matter accumulates at a working interface, charging a cost for occupation, not activity.", "page_ref": "prime:biofouling", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Working interface -> load-retaining reservoir.", "slug": "biofouling", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a working interface that retains deposits until active removal."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The system contains a compartment, interface, backlog, ledger, codebase, relationship, or other reservoir able to retain load.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Source reduction, isolation, cleanup, repair, repayment, rest, or outflow enhancement is possible before irreversible failure.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "At that point, the relevant intervention is often no longer a small adjustment; it is cleanup, repair, repayment, containment, or crisis recovery. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: Source reduction, isolation, cleanup, repair, repayment, rest, or outflow enhancement is possible before irreversible failure. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Source reduction, isolation, cleanup, repair, repayment, rest, or outflow enhancement is possible before irreversible failure.", "At that point, the relevant intervention is often no longer a small adjustment; it is cleanup, repair, repayment, containment, or crisis recovery."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Source reduction, isolation, cleanup, repair, repayment, rest, or outflow enhancement is possible before irreversible failure."}, {"display_text": "The system has enough observability to approximate stored load or at least identify high-risk reservoirs for inspection.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Each new input may be small enough to approve, but the reservoir remembers. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: The system has enough observability to approximate stored load or at least identify high-risk reservoirs for inspection. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The system has enough observability to approximate stored load or at least identify high-risk reservoirs for inspection.", "Each new input may be small enough to approve, but the reservoir remembers."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The system has enough observability to approximate stored load or at least identify high-risk reservoirs for inspection."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 7, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-007", "ledger_sha256": "0c8b91ca9f9d4f1ee832030c2225b334fa7ec1fac4a42fd2c3bc9fef1b116c7a"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Birthday-Bound Collision Budgeting", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:birthday_bound_collision_budgeting", "slug": "birthday_bound_collision_budgeting"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system treats a large finite space as effectively inexhaustible, while many pairwise opportunities for duplicate assignment, label collision, or shared slot occupancy accumulate faster than intuition expects.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system treats a large finite space as effectively inexhaustible, while many pairwise opportunities for duplicate assignment, label collision, or shared slot occupancy accumulate faster than intuition expects."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a finite namespace of size K filled by a sequence of N draws.", "role_mapping": "Namespace -> label or slot space; draws -> assigned items.", "slug": "birthday_problem", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b007_a07_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Many actors, records, objects, requests, samples, or events are assigned labels or slots from a finite space. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Many actors, records, objects, requests, samples, or events are assigned labels or slots from a finite space."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Birthday Problem", "one_liner": "Pairwise collisions in a finite namespace become likely at the square root of its size, not half of it.", "page_ref": "prime:birthday_problem", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Namespace -> label or slot space; draws -> assigned items.", "slug": "birthday_problem", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a finite namespace of size K filled by a sequence of N draws."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Many items draw labels or slots from a finite namespace.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires independent random filling without coordination with prior draws.", "role_mapping": "Random draws -> uncoordinated assignments.", "slug": "birthday_problem", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b007_a07_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Assignments are random, pseudo-random, hashed, user-generated, or otherwise not globally coordinated before use. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Assignments are random, pseudo-random, hashed, user-generated, or otherwise not globally coordinated before use."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Birthday Problem", "one_liner": "Pairwise collisions in a finite namespace become likely at the square root of its size, not half of it.", "page_ref": "prime:birthday_problem", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Random draws -> uncoordinated assignments.", "slug": "birthday_problem", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires independent random filling without coordination with prior draws."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Assignments are random, pseudo-random, hashed, user-generated, or otherwise not globally coordinated before use.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The collision law is consequence-neutral and permits harmless duplicates.", "slug": "birthday_problem"}], "residual_id": "r:birthday_bound_collision_budgeting:b007_a07_c3", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b007_a07_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The consequence of a duplicate is nontrivial: ambiguity, overwrite, impersonation, lost traceability, experimental contamination, or operational delay. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The consequence of a duplicate is nontrivial: ambiguity, overwrite, impersonation, lost traceability, experimental contamination, or operational delay."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The collision law is consequence-neutral and permits harmless duplicates.", "slug": "birthday_problem"}], "normalized_requirement": "A duplicate causes nontrivial ambiguity, overwrite, impersonation, traceability loss, contamination, or delay.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A duplicate causes nontrivial ambiguity, overwrite, impersonation, traceability loss, contamination, or delay.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's central contrast is linear element count versus quadratic pair count and the resulting intuition failure.", "role_mapping": "Occupancy reasoning -> element count; collision opportunities -> pair count.", "slug": "birthday_problem", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b007_a07_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Decision makers reason from the fraction of namespace used instead of the number of pairwise collision opportunities. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Decision makers reason from the fraction of namespace used instead of the number of pairwise collision opportunities."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Birthday Problem", "one_liner": "Pairwise collisions in a finite namespace become likely at the square root of its size, not half of it.", "page_ref": "prime:birthday_problem", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Occupancy reasoning -> element count; collision opportunities -> pair count.", "slug": "birthday_problem", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's central contrast is linear element count versus quadratic pair count and the resulting intuition failure."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Decision makers reason from namespace occupancy rather than the quadratic number of any-pair collision opportunities.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires collision probability to become material when the draw count reaches order square-root of the namespace.", "role_mapping": "N draws and K namespace -> source n and N; N²/K -> collision budget.", "slug": "birthday_problem", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b007_a07_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The system is growing toward a draw count where n² is no longer negligible relative to the available space N. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The system is growing toward a draw count where n² is no longer negligible relative to the available space N."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Birthday Problem", "one_liner": "Pairwise collisions in a finite namespace become likely at the square root of its size, not half of it.", "page_ref": "prime:birthday_problem", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "N draws and K namespace -> source n and N; N²/K -> collision budget.", "slug": "birthday_problem", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires collision probability to become material when the draw count reaches order square-root of the namespace."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The draw count is approaching the regime where n squared is non-negligible relative to namespace size N.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 7, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-007", "ledger_sha256": "0c8b91ca9f9d4f1ee832030c2225b334fa7ec1fac4a42fd2c3bc9fef1b116c7a"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Black-Box / White-Box Selection", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:black_box_white_box_selection", "slug": "black_box_white_box_selection"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 1, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 7 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 7}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is an evidence mismatch. The system needs to be evaluated, but the evaluation mode is unclear. Behavior-only evidence may be too shallow; internal inspection may be too intrusive, costly, risky, or irrelevant. Without an explicit choice, teams either over-trust surface behavior, drown in undirected documentation, or stall because no one knows what evidence counts.\n\nThe archetype appears when a system’s visible outputs and hidden mechanisms are both relevant but not equally necessary for every decision. A low-risk acceptance decision may need only behavior tests. A high-stakes accountability decision may require internal controls, records, logic, and appeal paths. A diagnostic decision may start from behavior and then escalate inward.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Actors need to evaluate, trust, diagnose, govern, or improve a system but have not decided whether input-output behavior is sufficient evidence or whether internal mechanisms, processes, controls, data, or reasoning must be inspected."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime explicitly separates behavioral input-output adequacy from transparent internal-mechanism specification.", "role_mapping": "Behavioral abstraction -> visible tests; internal state -> hidden mechanisms.", "slug": "black_box_vs_white_box_distinction", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b007_a08_c1a", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A system performs acceptably in visible tests, but hidden mechanisms could still create safety, fairness, security, legality, or maintainability risk. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A system performs acceptably in visible tests, but hidden mechanisms could still create safety, fairness, security, legality, or maintainability risk."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Black Box vs. White Box Distinction", "one_liner": "Visibility of internal structure.", "page_ref": "prime:black_box_vs_white_box_distinction", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Behavioral abstraction -> visible tests; internal state -> hidden mechanisms.", "slug": "black_box_vs_white_box_distinction", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime explicitly separates behavioral input-output adequacy from transparent internal-mechanism specification."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Visible input-output tests can look acceptable while internal mechanisms remain unknown.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Internal opacity does not require a harmful hidden mechanism or risk.", "slug": "black_box_vs_white_box_distinction"}], "residual_id": "r:black_box_white_box_selection:b007_a08_c1b", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b007_a08_c1b", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A system performs acceptably in visible tests, but hidden mechanisms could still create safety, fairness, security, legality, or maintainability risk. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A system performs acceptably in visible tests, but hidden mechanisms could still create safety, fairness, security, legality, or maintainability risk."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Internal opacity does not require a harmful hidden mechanism or risk.", "slug": "black_box_vs_white_box_distinction"}], "normalized_requirement": "Unknown internal mechanisms could still create safety, fairness, security, legality, or maintainability risk.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Unknown internal mechanisms could still create safety, fairness, security, legality, or maintainability risk.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime makes model purpose and the cost of transparency determine the appropriate level of internal detail.", "role_mapping": "Analysis purpose -> evaluation goal; transparency cost -> access burden.", "slug": "black_box_vs_white_box_distinction", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b007_a08_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Internal access is requested, but the evaluation goal may not justify its cost, intrusion, confidentiality risk, or review burden. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Internal access is requested, but the evaluation goal may not justify its cost, intrusion, confidentiality risk, or review burden."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Black Box vs. White Box Distinction", "one_liner": "Visibility of internal structure.", "page_ref": "prime:black_box_vs_white_box_distinction", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Analysis purpose -> evaluation goal; transparency cost -> access burden.", "slug": "black_box_vs_white_box_distinction", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime makes model purpose and the cost of transparency determine the appropriate level of internal detail."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The purpose of evaluation may not justify the cost, intrusion, confidentiality risk, or burden of internal access.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Systematic comparison does not require disagreement over behavioral versus mechanistic evidence.", "slug": "comparative_method"}], "residual_id": "r:black_box_white_box_selection:b007_a08_c3", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_AMBIGUITY", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b007_a08_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Stakeholders disagree about whether observed outcomes, process evidence, explanations, or control design should count as decisive evidence. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders disagree about whether observed outcomes, process evidence, explanations, or control design should count as decisive evidence."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Systematic comparison does not require disagreement over behavioral versus mechanistic evidence.", "slug": "comparative_method"}], "normalized_requirement": "Stakeholders disagree whether outcomes, mechanisms, explanations, or control design should be decisive evidence.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_AMBIGUITY", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Stakeholders disagree whether outcomes, mechanisms, explanations, or control design should be decisive evidence.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime permits black-box treatment when internals are inaccessible, unnecessary, or uneconomical for the analytic purpose.", "role_mapping": "Opaque internals -> inaccessible system; purpose-driven stance -> pending evaluation decision.", "slug": "black_box_vs_white_box_distinction", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b007_a08_c4a", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A decision must be made under uncertainty about a system whose internals may be inaccessible, proprietary, complex, sensitive, or too costly to inspect fully. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A decision must be made under uncertainty about a system whose internals may be inaccessible, proprietary, complex, sensitive, or too costly to inspect fully."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Black Box vs. White Box Distinction", "one_liner": "Visibility of internal structure.", "page_ref": "prime:black_box_vs_white_box_distinction", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Opaque internals -> inaccessible system; purpose-driven stance -> pending evaluation decision.", "slug": "black_box_vs_white_box_distinction", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime permits black-box treatment when internals are inaccessible, unnecessary, or uneconomical for the analytic purpose."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A decision must be made under uncertainty while internal structure is inaccessible, proprietary, complex, sensitive, or too costly to inspect fully.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [], "residual_id": "r:black_box_white_box_selection:b007_a08_c4b", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b007_a08_c4b", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A decision must be made under uncertainty about a system whose internals may be inaccessible, proprietary, complex, sensitive, or too costly to inspect fully. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A decision must be made under uncertainty about a system whose internals may be inaccessible, proprietary, complex, sensitive, or too costly to inspect fully."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The decision remains materially uncertain despite available behavioral evidence.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The decision remains materially uncertain despite available behavioral evidence.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P002-C05", "dnf": [], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [], "predicate": "Failure stakes make uniform transparency or testing requirements either unsafe or wasteful.", "resolution": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RESIDUAL", "semantic_scope": "NON_ABSTRACTION", "structural_head": "Failure-stakes threshold for tailoring evaluation requirements", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P002-C05-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Risk does not require a choice between black-box testing and white-box inspection.", "slug": "risk"}], "residual_id": "r:black_box_white_box_selection:b007_a08_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b007_a08_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The stakes of failure are high enough that a one-size-fits-all testing or transparency approach feels either unsafe or wasteful. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The stakes of failure are high enough that a one-size-fits-all testing or transparency approach feels either unsafe or wasteful."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RECLASSIFIED", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 1, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Risk does not require a choice between black-box testing and white-box inspection.", "slug": "risk"}], "normalized_requirement": "Failure stakes make uniform transparency or testing requirements either unsafe or wasteful.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RECLASSIFIED", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later candidate-blind atomization classified this remainder as a threshold, parameter, materiality test, or other non-abstraction rather than a catalog gap."}, "predicate": "Failure stakes make uniform transparency or testing requirements either unsafe or wasteful.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 7, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-007", "ledger_sha256": "0c8b91ca9f9d4f1ee832030c2225b334fa7ec1fac4a42fd2c3bc9fef1b116c7a"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Black-Swan Preparedness", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:black_swan_preparedness", "slug": "black_swan_preparedness"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 7 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 7}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Systems optimized for ordinary variance often remove the very capacities that make surprise survivable. Reserves look idle, diversity looks expensive, modularity looks redundant, and local discretion looks inconsistent. Forecast confidence then encourages concentration and irreversible commitments. When the model fails, defenses fail together and response authority arrives late.\n\nThe central tension is efficient specialization versus general survival. Preparedness has visible carrying costs before an event and uncertain attribution afterward. Yet catastrophic exposure is often created precisely by treating unused capacity and alternative paths as waste.\n\nA mature intervention makes survival floors, model limits, cascade paths, reserve rights, emergency authority, equity, and recovery choices inspectable before the shock.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system is optimized around ordinary variance and a trusted scenario set, leaving critical function dependent on concentrated resources, correlated defenses, tight coupling, thin reserves, centralized decisions, and recovery plans that assume the event is known. When an unmodeled high-impact event arrives, probability estimates and scripts provide little help while cascades, authority ambiguity, inequitable triage, and irreversible loss dominate."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires an event outside the operative expectation frame whose consequences materially dominate routine outcomes.", "role_mapping": "Out-of-frame event -> forecast error; dominant consequence -> critical outcome.", "slug": "black_swan_high_impact_low_probability_events", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b007_a09_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: forecast error could threaten critical or irreversible outcomes. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["forecast error could threaten critical or irreversible outcomes"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Black Swan (High-Impact, Low-Probability Events)", "one_liner": "High-impact unexpected events.", "page_ref": "prime:black_swan_high_impact_low_probability_events", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Out-of-frame event -> forecast error; dominant consequence -> critical outcome.", "slug": "black_swan_high_impact_low_probability_events", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires an event outside the operative expectation frame whose consequences materially dominate routine outcomes."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "An out-of-frame forecast error could dominate critical or irreversible outcomes.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires tail-correlated demands driven by a common stressor to defeat independence-based capacity pooling.", "role_mapping": "Tail-correlated demand -> dependent exposures; pooling discount -> diversification assumption.", "slug": "correlated_capacity_demand", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b007_a09_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: tail dependence or common shocks can defeat diversification. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["tail dependence or common shocks can defeat diversification"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Correlated Capacity Demand", "one_liner": "When demands on a shared finite resource are tail-correlated rather than independent, capacity sized for independent peaks fails at the rare joint exceedance.", "page_ref": "prime:correlated_capacity_demand", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Tail-correlated demand -> dependent exposures; pooling discount -> diversification assumption.", "slug": "correlated_capacity_demand", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires tail-correlated demands driven by a common stressor to defeat independence-based capacity pooling."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Tail dependence or common shocks can defeat independence-based diversification assumptions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A frontier outrunning its support backbone is narrower than high utilization and absent slack.", "slug": "operational_overextension"}], "residual_id": "r:black_swan_preparedness:b007_a09_c3", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b007_a09_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Efficiency and prediction favor concentration, utilization, and tailored plans, while survival under deep uncertainty requires slack, diversity, modularity, options, distributed agency, and preparedness that looks inefficient before the shock. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Systems operate near full utilization with little protected slack.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["systems operate near full utilization with little protected slack", "Efficiency and prediction favor concentration, utilization, and tailored plans, while survival under deep uncertainty requires slack, diversity, modularity, options, distributed agency, and preparedness that looks inefficient before the shock."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A frontier outrunning its support backbone is narrower than high utilization and absent slack.", "slug": "operational_overextension"}], "normalized_requirement": "Systems operate near full utilization with little protected slack.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Systems operate near full utilization with little protected slack.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a local shock to propagate through coupling into correlated whole-system failure.", "role_mapping": "Local shock -> initiating failure; propagation topology -> cross-boundary cascade.", "slug": "systemic_risk", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b007_a09_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: failure can cascade across technical, ecological, financial, or institutional boundaries. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["failure can cascade across technical, ecological, financial, or institutional boundaries"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Systemic Risk", "one_liner": "Risk that local failures propagate into system-wide collapse.", "page_ref": "prime:systemic_risk", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Local shock -> initiating failure; propagation topology -> cross-boundary cascade.", "slug": "systemic_risk", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a local shock to propagate through coupling into correlated whole-system failure."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Local failure can cascade across technical, ecological, financial, or institutional boundaries.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An incident-response function can be centralized, available, and timely.", "slug": "incident_response"}], "residual_id": "r:black_swan_preparedness:b007_a09_c5", "residual_kind": "CONTINGENT_FACT", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b007_a09_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: central coordination may be unavailable or too slow. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["central coordination may be unavailable or too slow"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An incident-response function can be centralized, available, and timely.", "slug": "incident_response"}], "normalized_requirement": "Central coordination may be unavailable or slower than the developing emergency.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "CONTINGENT_FACT", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Central coordination may be unavailable or slower than the developing emergency.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P002-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require exceptional or emergency authority, not ordinary administration alone.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The affecting mechanism is authority exercised under emergency conditions.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must make rights, rather than generic welfare or efficiency, the affected interest.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The affected object is protected rights.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail a directional effect from emergency authority to rights.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Emergency authority affects the rights.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail a consequential rights effect, not a merely nominal connection.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The effect on rights is material.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}], "predicate": "Emergency authority materially affects rights.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Emergency authority alters protected rights.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P002-C06-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P002-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require prioritization or allocation of scarce resources, not generic resource use.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The affecting mechanism is triage of scarce resources in an emergency.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must make rights, rather than generic welfare or efficiency, the affected interest.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The affected object is protected rights.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail a directional effect from resource triage to rights.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Resource triage affects the rights.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail a consequential rights effect, not a merely nominal connection.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The effect on rights is material.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}], "predicate": "Resource triage materially affects rights.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Emergency resource triage alters protected rights.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P002-C06-U2"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A rights-freedoms distinction does not require emergency authority or resource triage.", "slug": "rights_vs_freedoms"}], "residual_id": "r:black_swan_preparedness:b007_a09_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b007_a09_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: emergency authority and resource triage affect rights. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["emergency authority and resource triage affect rights"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 2, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 2}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A rights-freedoms distinction does not require emergency authority or resource triage.", "slug": "rights_vs_freedoms"}], "normalized_requirement": "Emergency authority and resource triage materially affect rights.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 2 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Emergency authority and resource triage materially affect rights.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P002-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern choices made in recovery, not an unrelated later event.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The acting role is a recovery choice affecting the system configuration.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must reproduce an exposure or vulnerability condition of the recovering system.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The recreated object is an exposure borne by the system.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail that recovery choices can reproduce the exposure; it need not entail that reproduction actually occurs.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The recovery choices provide a causal pathway capable of recreating the exposure.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail a real possibility of recurrence; actuality is not required.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Recreation of the exposure is possible.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve identity or substantive equivalence with the earlier exposure.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The recreated exposure is the same exposure as the antecedent one.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must link the earlier exposure causally to the system's fragility.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The antecedent exposure made the system fragile.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Recovery choices could recreate the same exposure that made the system fragile.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Recovery can reproduce the system's antecedent fragility-causing exposure.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P002-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Restoration after disturbance does not require recreating the causal exposure.", "slug": "recovery"}], "residual_id": "r:black_swan_preparedness:b007_a09_c7", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b007_a09_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: recovery could recreate the same exposure. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["recovery could recreate the same exposure"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Restoration after disturbance does not require recreating the causal exposure.", "slug": "recovery"}], "normalized_requirement": "Recovery choices could recreate the same exposure that made the system fragile.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Recovery choices could recreate the same exposure that made the system fragile.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 7, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-007", "ledger_sha256": "0c8b91ca9f9d4f1ee832030c2225b334fa7ec1fac4a42fd2c3bc9fef1b116c7a"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Blinding and Expectancy Bias Reduction", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:blinding_and_expectancy_bias_reduction", "slug": "blinding_and_expectancy_bias_reduction"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 3, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 7 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 3 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 7}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A comparison, trial, review, or evaluation depends on unbiased behavior or judgment, but roles involved in the process can infer which condition, source, treatment, or variant they are handling; that knowledge can alter experience, delivery, reporting, measurement, analysis, or interpretation.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A comparison, trial, review, or evaluation depends on unbiased behavior or judgment, but roles involved in the process can infer which condition, source, treatment, or variant they are handling; that knowledge can alter experience, delivery, reporting, measurement, analysis, or interpretation."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a specific expectancy, identity, group, contact, or label whose presence could bias judgment.", "role_mapping": "Bias source -> party expectation; protected judgment -> comparison outcome.", "slug": "blinding", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b007_a10_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Participants, providers, raters, reviewers, data collectors, adjudicators, analysts, or sponsors have expectations about which condition should work or be preferred. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Participants, providers, raters, reviewers, data collectors, adjudicators, analysts, or sponsors have expectations about which condition should work or be preferred."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Blinding", "one_liner": "Deliberately withholding a specific piece of information from a decision-maker so a downstream judgment cannot be contaminated by it — a targeted severance of a bias channel.", "page_ref": "prime:blinding", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Bias source -> party expectation; protected judgment -> comparison outcome.", "slug": "blinding", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a specific expectancy, identity, group, contact, or label whose presence could bias judgment."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A party influencing the comparison holds an expectation about which condition, identity, source, or label should prevail.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a diagnostic, evaluative, allocative, or measurement judgment vulnerable to contamination.", "role_mapping": "Vulnerable judgment -> subjective, behavioral, or judgment-dependent outcome.", "slug": "blinding", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b007_a10_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Outcomes are subjective, behavior-dependent, judgment-dependent, or sensitive to interaction quality. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Outcomes are subjective, behavior-dependent, judgment-dependent, or sensitive to interaction quality."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Blinding", "one_liner": "Deliberately withholding a specific piece of information from a decision-maker so a downstream judgment cannot be contaminated by it — a targeted severance of a bias channel.", "page_ref": "prime:blinding", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Vulnerable judgment -> subjective, behavioral, or judgment-dependent outcome.", "slug": "blinding", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a diagnostic, evaluative, allocative, or measurement judgment vulnerable to contamination."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The outcome depends on behavior, interaction, interpretation, or another judgment-vulnerable operation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires an information channel carrying the contaminating label or cue into the protected judgment.", "role_mapping": "Information channel -> condition-revealing cue.", "slug": "blinding", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b007_a10_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The active and comparator conditions differ in labels, procedures, sensory cues, side effects, prestige, institutional source, or metadata. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The active and comparator conditions differ in labels, procedures, sensory cues, side effects, prestige, institutional source, or metadata."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Blinding", "one_liner": "Deliberately withholding a specific piece of information from a decision-maker so a downstream judgment cannot be contaminated by it — a targeted severance of a bias channel.", "page_ref": "prime:blinding", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Information channel -> condition-revealing cue.", "slug": "blinding", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires an information channel carrying the contaminating label or cue into the protected judgment."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Labels, procedures, sensory cues, side effects, prestige, source, or metadata reveal condition identity.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P002-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require staff knowledge of which assignment or condition they are implementing.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The information source is knowledge of assignment to a condition.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must locate the behavioral response in staff who deliver or implement the assigned condition.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The influenced actor is implementation staff.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve causal direction from knowledge to implementation behavior.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Assignment knowledge can cause the staff's differential conduct.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail susceptibility to the effect; it need not assert that the effect always occurs.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The differential conduct is a possible consequence.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail differential implementation behavior, not merely a difference in later assessment.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Implementation staff provide differential conduct or co-intervention.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require unequal treatment relative to another assignment or condition.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The provision differs across assignments or conditions.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Assignment knowledge could make implementation staff provide unequal attention, reassurance, enthusiasm, troubleshooting, or scrutiny.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Assignment knowledge can cause differential implementation conduct.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P002-C08-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Blinding can protect a different judgment channel and does not require implementer co-intervention.", "slug": "blinding"}], "residual_id": "r:blinding_and_expectancy_bias_reduction:b007_a10_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b007_a10_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Implementation staff could provide unequal attention, reassurance, troubleshooting, enthusiasm, or scrutiny if they know assignment. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Implementation staff could provide unequal attention, reassurance, troubleshooting, enthusiasm, or scrutiny if they know assignment."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Blinding can protect a different judgment channel and does not require implementer co-intervention.", "slug": "blinding"}], "normalized_requirement": "Assignment knowledge could make implementation staff provide unequal attention, reassurance, enthusiasm, troubleshooting, or scrutiny.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Assignment knowledge could make implementation staff provide unequal attention, reassurance, enthusiasm, troubleshooting, or scrutiny.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The exposed information channel connects the operative bias source to the vulnerable judgment in the actual comparison.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The exposed information channel connects the operative bias source to the vulnerable judgment in the actual comparison.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a specific expectancy, identity, group, contact, or label whose presence could bias judgment.", "role_mapping": "Bias source -> party expectation; protected judgment -> comparison outcome.", "slug": "blinding", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b007_a10_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Participants, providers, raters, reviewers, data collectors, adjudicators, analysts, or sponsors have expectations about which condition should work or be preferred. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Participants, providers, raters, reviewers, data collectors, adjudicators, analysts, or sponsors have expectations about which condition should work or be preferred."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Blinding", "one_liner": "Deliberately withholding a specific piece of information from a decision-maker so a downstream judgment cannot be contaminated by it — a targeted severance of a bias channel.", "page_ref": "prime:blinding", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Bias source -> party expectation; protected judgment -> comparison outcome.", "slug": "blinding", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a specific expectancy, identity, group, contact, or label whose presence could bias judgment."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A party influencing the comparison holds an expectation about which condition, identity, source, or label should prevail.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a diagnostic, evaluative, allocative, or measurement judgment vulnerable to contamination.", "role_mapping": "Vulnerable judgment -> subjective, behavioral, or judgment-dependent outcome.", "slug": "blinding", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b007_a10_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Outcomes are subjective, behavior-dependent, judgment-dependent, or sensitive to interaction quality. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Outcomes are subjective, behavior-dependent, judgment-dependent, or sensitive to interaction quality."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Blinding", "one_liner": "Deliberately withholding a specific piece of information from a decision-maker so a downstream judgment cannot be contaminated by it — a targeted severance of a bias channel.", "page_ref": "prime:blinding", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Vulnerable judgment -> subjective, behavioral, or judgment-dependent outcome.", "slug": "blinding", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a diagnostic, evaluative, allocative, or measurement judgment vulnerable to contamination."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The outcome depends on behavior, interaction, interpretation, or another judgment-vulnerable operation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires an information channel carrying the contaminating label or cue into the protected judgment.", "role_mapping": "Information channel -> condition-revealing cue.", "slug": "blinding", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b007_a10_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The active and comparator conditions differ in labels, procedures, sensory cues, side effects, prestige, institutional source, or metadata. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The active and comparator conditions differ in labels, procedures, sensory cues, side effects, prestige, institutional source, or metadata."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Blinding", "one_liner": "Deliberately withholding a specific piece of information from a decision-maker so a downstream judgment cannot be contaminated by it — a targeted severance of a bias channel.", "page_ref": "prime:blinding", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Information channel -> condition-revealing cue.", "slug": "blinding", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires an information channel carrying the contaminating label or cue into the protected judgment."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Labels, procedures, sensory cues, side effects, prestige, source, or metadata reveal condition identity.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P002-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must place the affected judgment in an assessment or rating role.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The influenced actor is an assessor who rates evidence.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require evidence open to discretionary interpretation rather than an unambiguous outcome.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The rated object is ambiguous evidence.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve causal direction from exposed information to assessor judgment.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Known assignment or identity information can influence the rating.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail susceptibility to differential rating without requiring that it always occurs.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Differential rating is a possible consequence of the knowledge.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail differential ratings relative to another assignment or identity category.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The assessor rates the same kind of ambiguous evidence differently across known categories.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require assessor knowledge of treatment, condition, source, site, period, hypothesis, or equivalent assignment.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "A complete branch exposes assignment information to the assessor.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require assessor knowledge of applicant, vendor, school, person, or equivalent evaluated identity.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "A complete branch exposes identity information to the assessor.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}], "predicate": "Assignment or identity knowledge could make assessors rate ambiguous evidence differently.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Evaluation-relevant knowledge can bias assessor ratings of ambiguous evidence.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P002-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Confirmation bias need not involve treatment assignment, identity exposure, or outcome assessment.", "slug": "confirmation_bias"}], "residual_id": "r:blinding_and_expectancy_bias_reduction:b007_a10_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b007_a10_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Outcome assessors could rate ambiguous evidence differently if they know treatment group, applicant identity, vendor, school, site, time period, or hypothesis. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Outcome assessors could rate ambiguous evidence differently if they know treatment group, applicant identity, vendor, school, site, time period, or hypothesis."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_GUARDED_EQUIVALENT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Authority bias can operate on a decisive, unambiguous instruction, so ambiguity is not entailed without the qualifier.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Authority Bias", "one_liner": "Decompose any act of deference into a content term and a source-cue term, and flag the upward tilt as bias whenever authority signals — titles, uniforms, confident bearing — inflate credence beyond the authority's genuine expertise in the specific claim.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:authority_bias", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "evaluated_claim_ambiguous_evidence", "predicate": "The claim evaluated by the judge is ambiguous evidence.", "rationale": "The retained context guard is anchored in a named exact-record role or branch, is a single atomic fact, and leaves no complete guarded instance that falsifies the selected DNF branch."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "authority_bias"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "evaluated_claim_ambiguous_evidence"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "authority_bias", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P002-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "Authoritative necessity review confirms the exact candidate supplies the structural spine and the retained single atomic context guard fills all remaining obligations in one complete DNF branch. The candidate directly supplies identity-cue-driven differential judgment; one domain restriction types the evaluated claim as ambiguous evidence."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Assignment or identity knowledge could make assessors rate ambiguous evidence differently.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The exposed information channel connects the operative bias source to the vulnerable judgment in the actual comparison.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The exposed information channel connects the operative bias source to the vulnerable judgment in the actual comparison.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a specific expectancy, identity, group, contact, or label whose presence could bias judgment.", "role_mapping": "Bias source -> party expectation; protected judgment -> comparison outcome.", "slug": "blinding", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b007_a10_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Participants, providers, raters, reviewers, data collectors, adjudicators, analysts, or sponsors have expectations about which condition should work or be preferred. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Participants, providers, raters, reviewers, data collectors, adjudicators, analysts, or sponsors have expectations about which condition should work or be preferred."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Blinding", "one_liner": "Deliberately withholding a specific piece of information from a decision-maker so a downstream judgment cannot be contaminated by it — a targeted severance of a bias channel.", "page_ref": "prime:blinding", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Bias source -> party expectation; protected judgment -> comparison outcome.", "slug": "blinding", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a specific expectancy, identity, group, contact, or label whose presence could bias judgment."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A party influencing the comparison holds an expectation about which condition, identity, source, or label should prevail.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a diagnostic, evaluative, allocative, or measurement judgment vulnerable to contamination.", "role_mapping": "Vulnerable judgment -> subjective, behavioral, or judgment-dependent outcome.", "slug": "blinding", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b007_a10_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Outcomes are subjective, behavior-dependent, judgment-dependent, or sensitive to interaction quality. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Outcomes are subjective, behavior-dependent, judgment-dependent, or sensitive to interaction quality."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Blinding", "one_liner": "Deliberately withholding a specific piece of information from a decision-maker so a downstream judgment cannot be contaminated by it — a targeted severance of a bias channel.", "page_ref": "prime:blinding", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Vulnerable judgment -> subjective, behavioral, or judgment-dependent outcome.", "slug": "blinding", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a diagnostic, evaluative, allocative, or measurement judgment vulnerable to contamination."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The outcome depends on behavior, interaction, interpretation, or another judgment-vulnerable operation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires an information channel carrying the contaminating label or cue into the protected judgment.", "role_mapping": "Information channel -> condition-revealing cue.", "slug": "blinding", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b007_a10_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The active and comparator conditions differ in labels, procedures, sensory cues, side effects, prestige, institutional source, or metadata. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The active and comparator conditions differ in labels, procedures, sensory cues, side effects, prestige, institutional source, or metadata."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Blinding", "one_liner": "Deliberately withholding a specific piece of information from a decision-maker so a downstream judgment cannot be contaminated by it — a targeted severance of a bias channel.", "page_ref": "prime:blinding", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Information channel -> condition-revealing cue.", "slug": "blinding", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires an information channel carrying the contaminating label or cue into the protected judgment."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Labels, procedures, sensory cues, side effects, prestige, source, or metadata reveal condition identity.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P002-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must locate the influenced discretion in data analysis rather than implementation or outcome assessment.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The influenced actor is an analyst making analysis choices.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require knowledge of which analytic label corresponds to the favored or desired condition.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The exposed information links a label to the desired condition.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require latitude in cleaning, exclusion, coding, model selection, or equivalent analysis choices.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The analyst has discretion over consequential analytic choices.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve causal direction from label knowledge to analytic choice.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Label knowledge can bias the discretionary choices.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail susceptibility to bias without requiring an observed biased choice.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Bias of the discretionary choice is possible.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "Label knowledge could bias discretionary cleaning, exclusion, coding, or model choice by analysts.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Knowledge of desired-condition labels can bias analysts' discretionary analytic choices.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P002-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Biased evidence processing does not require discretionary analysis choices or condition-label knowledge.", "slug": "confirmation_bias"}], "residual_id": "r:blinding_and_expectancy_bias_reduction:b007_a10_c7", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b007_a10_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Analysts have discretion over cleaning, exclusion, model choice, or coding and could be influenced by knowing which label corresponds to the desired condition. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Analysts have discretion over cleaning, exclusion, model choice, or coding and could be influenced by knowing which label corresponds to the desired condition."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Biased evidence processing does not require discretionary analysis choices or condition-label knowledge.", "slug": "confirmation_bias"}], "normalized_requirement": "Label knowledge could bias discretionary cleaning, exclusion, coding, or model choice by analysts.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Label knowledge could bias discretionary cleaning, exclusion, coding, or model choice by analysts.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The exposed information channel connects the operative bias source to the vulnerable judgment in the actual comparison.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The exposed information channel connects the operative bias source to the vulnerable judgment in the actual comparison.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A comparison is intended to isolate the effect of the intervention rather than the effect of being told which intervention one received.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: A comparison is intended to isolate the effect of the intervention rather than the effect of being told which intervention one received. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A comparison is intended to isolate the effect of the intervention rather than the effect of being told which intervention one received."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "A comparison is intended to isolate the effect of the intervention rather than the effect of being told which intervention one received."}, {"display_text": "The design allows condition identity to be hidden or neutralized without unacceptable risk, deception, or operational breakdown.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: The design allows condition identity to be hidden or neutralized without unacceptable risk, deception, or operational breakdown. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The design allows condition identity to be hidden or neutralized without unacceptable risk, deception, or operational breakdown."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 8, "text": "The design allows condition identity to be hidden or neutralized without unacceptable risk, deception, or operational breakdown."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 7, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-007", "ledger_sha256": "0c8b91ca9f9d4f1ee832030c2225b334fa7ec1fac4a42fd2c3bc9fef1b116c7a"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Blocking Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:blocking_design", "slug": "blocking_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 2 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 2}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Chance assignment protects against systematic bias in expectation, but a realized sample can still be uneven on important prognostic factors. Known nuisance variation inflates residual noise, weakens power, and makes small-sample effects unstable.\n\nBlocking improves the design by comparing like with like, but overblocking fragments evidence, can reveal allocations, excludes unmatched units, and complicates the estimand. Mature design balances similarity, coverage, concealment, and transport.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Random assignment can leave important prognostic factors uneven, especially in small or heterogeneous samples. Uncontrolled variation inflates noise, weakens power, and can create fragile comparisons. Post hoc adjustment cannot always recover a poor assignment architecture."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires known nuisance variables measured before assignment and used to form homogeneous blocks.", "role_mapping": "Known nuisance dimension -> pretreatment predictor; grouping -> design block.", "slug": "blocking_in_experimental_design", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b007_a11_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: strong pretreatment predictors are known. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["strong pretreatment predictors are known"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Blocking (In Experimental Design)", "one_liner": "Group similar units.", "page_ref": "prime:blocking_in_experimental_design", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Known nuisance dimension -> pretreatment predictor; grouping -> design block.", "slug": "blocking_in_experimental_design", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires known nuisance variables measured before assignment and used to form homogeneous blocks."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Strong pretreatment predictors of outcome or nuisance variation are known before assignment.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires treatment effects to be estimated as within-block contrasts under shared nuisance conditions.", "role_mapping": "Treatments crossed with blocks -> treatments compared under shared conditions.", "slug": "blocking_in_experimental_design", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b007_a11_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: treatments must be compared under shared conditions. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["treatments must be compared under shared conditions"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Blocking (In Experimental Design)", "one_liner": "Group similar units.", "page_ref": "prime:blocking_in_experimental_design", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Treatments crossed with blocks -> treatments compared under shared conditions.", "slug": "blocking_in_experimental_design", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires treatment effects to be estimated as within-block contrasts under shared nuisance conditions."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Treatments must be compared under shared nuisance conditions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "sample is small or heterogeneous.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially valuable in small samples and constrained operations. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: sample is small or heterogeneous. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["sample is small or heterogeneous", "It is especially valuable in small samples and constrained operations."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "sample is small or heterogeneous"}, {"display_text": "units arrive by site, batch, period, field, or cluster.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use blocking when strong pretreatment predictors, sites, clusters, batches, periods, locations, or operating conditions create material heterogeneity and unrestricted assignment may yield noisy or fragile comparisons. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: units arrive by site, batch, period, field, or cluster. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["units arrive by site, batch, period, field, or cluster", "Use blocking when strong pretreatment predictors, sites, clusters, batches, periods, locations, or operating conditions create material heterogeneity and unrestricted assignment may yield noisy or fragile comparisons."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "units arrive by site, batch, period, field, or cluster"}, {"display_text": "precision is scarce.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: precision is scarce. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["precision is scarce"]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "precision is scarce"}, {"display_text": "operational constraints prevent complete unrestricted randomization.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: operational constraints prevent complete unrestricted randomization. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["operational constraints prevent complete unrestricted randomization"]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "operational constraints prevent complete unrestricted randomization"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 7, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-007", "ledger_sha256": "0c8b91ca9f9d4f1ee832030c2225b334fa7ec1fac4a42fd2c3bc9fef1b116c7a"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": [{"groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Tried site as the named conditioning covariate without site-defined unit strata; conditional independence is defined within strata of that covariate, so the counterexample is incoherent.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Selection on Observables", "one_liner": "Assume that, conditional on a named set of measured covariates, treatment assignment is independent of potential outcomes — so within each covariate stratum treated and untreated units are exchangeable and adjustment recovers the causal effect.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:selection_on_observables", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O7"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "conditioning_covariate_is_site", "predicate": "The named conditioning covariate that defines strata is site.", "rationale": "The retained context guard is anchored in a named exact-record role or branch, is a single atomic fact, and leaves no complete guarded instance that falsifies the selected DNF branch."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "selection_on_observables"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "conditioning_covariate_is_site"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "selection_on_observables", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P002-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "Authoritative necessity review confirms the exact candidate supplies the structural spine and the retained single atomic context guard fills all remaining obligations in one complete DNF branch. The exact record supplies the structural spine and one atomic, candidate-anchored contingent fact fills every gap in one complete DNF branch without adding a role or second relation."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Tried study-unit orders not organized into timed cohorts; cohort formation and time-boxing are constitutive of wave picking, so the guarded instance cannot preserve that failure.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Wave Picking", "one_liner": "Release warehouse orders not on arrival but in timed, compatibility-grouped cohorts, deliberately accepting a bounded latency wait so that picking, packing, and loading run synchronously against the same wave and downstream stations stay neither starved nor overwhelmed.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:wave_picking", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "orders_are_study_units", "predicate": "The warehouse orders are the experimental or observational units.", "rationale": "The retained context guard is anchored in a named exact-record role or branch, is a single atomic fact, and leaves no complete guarded instance that falsifies the selected DNF branch."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "wave_picking"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "orders_are_study_units"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "wave_picking", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P002-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "Authoritative necessity review confirms the exact candidate supplies the structural spine and the retained single atomic context guard fills all remaining obligations in one complete DNF branch. The exact record supplies the structural spine and one atomic, candidate-anchored contingent fact fills every gap in one complete DNF branch without adding a role or second relation."}], "publication_role": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT_ONLY", "source_residual_occurrence_id": "r:blocking_design:b007_a11_c3", "unit": {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P002-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"], ["O1", "O3"], ["O1", "O4"], ["O1", "O5"], ["O1", "O6"], ["O1", "O7"], ["O1", "O8"], ["O1", "O9"], ["O1", "O10"], ["O1", "O11"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern units entering or belonging to operational groupings.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The grouped entities are experimental or observational units.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail arrival cohorts partitioned or indexed by site.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A complete branch is that units arrive by site.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail arrival cohorts partitioned or indexed by batch.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A complete branch is that units arrive by batch.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail arrival cohorts partitioned or indexed by time period.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A complete branch is that units arrive by period.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail arrival cohorts partitioned or indexed by field context.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "A complete branch is that units arrive by field.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail arrival cohorts partitioned or indexed by cluster.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "A complete branch is that units arrive by cluster.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail organization of units into site-defined groups.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "A complete branch is that units are organized by site.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail organization of units into batch-defined groups.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "A complete branch is that units are organized by batch.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail organization of units into period-defined groups.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "A complete branch is that units are organized by period.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail organization of units into field-defined groups.", "obligation_id": "O10", "statement": "A complete branch is that units are organized by field.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail organization of units into cluster-defined groups.", "obligation_id": "O11", "statement": "A complete branch is that units are organized by cluster.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Units arrive or are organized by site, batch, period, field, or cluster.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Units occur in operationally defined groups.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P002-C11-U1"}}]}
{"archetype": {"name": "Bottleneck Capacity Shadowing", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:bottleneck_capacity_shadowing", "slug": "bottleneck_capacity_shadowing"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 4 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is not merely that a bottleneck exists. The harder problem is that multiple constraints compete for attention and the organization does not know which one most limits the objective. Teams often invest where complaints are loudest, where data is easiest to see, or where a department has the strongest political claim. That can relieve a visible constraint while leaving the real limiting factor untouched.\n\nThis pattern becomes important when relief itself is scarce. If every constraint can be relaxed cheaply and safely, shadow valuation is unnecessary. But when capacity, money, time, political capital, or disruption budget is limited, the system needs a way to compare relief opportunities.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system is constrained by multiple limits, but actors do not know which constraint most restricts the objective or how much benefit would result from relaxing each one."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A bottleneck is the single currently binding minimum, not the appearance of several simultaneous candidates.", "slug": "bottleneck"}], "residual_id": "r:bottleneck_capacity_shadowing:b007_a12_c1", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_AMBIGUITY", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b007_a12_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Several constraints appear to be limiting performance. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Several constraints appear to be limiting performance."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A bottleneck is the single currently binding minimum, not the appearance of several simultaneous candidates.", "slug": "bottleneck"}], "normalized_requirement": "Several constraints appear to be limiting system performance.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_AMBIGUITY", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Several constraints appear to be limiting system performance.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Foregone alternatives do not require bottleneck-relief options or operational disruption.", "slug": "opportunity_cost"}], "residual_id": "r:bottleneck_capacity_shadowing:b007_a12_c2", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b007_a12_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "But when capacity, money, time, political capital, or disruption budget is limited, the system needs a way to compare relief opportunities. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Relief options require scarce investment, time, political capital, or operational disruption.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Relief options require scarce investment, time, political capital, or operational disruption.", "But when capacity, money, time, political capital, or disruption budget is limited, the system needs a way to compare relief opportunities."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Foregone alternatives do not require bottleneck-relief options or operational disruption.", "slug": "opportunity_cost"}], "normalized_requirement": "Relief options require scarce investment, time, political capital, or operational disruption.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Relief options require scarce investment, time, political capital, or operational disruption.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires the binding minimum to jump to a new location after the current constraint is relieved.", "role_mapping": "Current minimum-capacity stage -> bottleneck; next minimum -> migrated bottleneck.", "slug": "bottleneck", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b007_a12_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The bottleneck may migrate after relief. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The bottleneck may migrate after relief."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Bottleneck", "one_liner": "The single limiting stage that caps an entire system's throughput.", "page_ref": "prime:bottleneck", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Current minimum-capacity stage -> bottleneck; next minimum -> migrated bottleneck.", "slug": "bottleneck", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires the binding minimum to jump to a new location after the current constraint is relieved."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Relieving the current binding constraint can move the bottleneck to another stage or resource.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The decision problem is to rank candidate constraint relief by marginal objective gain per scarce intervention resource.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The decision problem is to rank candidate constraint relief by marginal objective gain per scarce intervention resource.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A model, process map, or operational record can estimate response to constraint relaxation.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Do not use it to justify relaxing safety, fairness, legal, privacy, or due-process constraints simply because their relaxation appears valuable. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: A model, process map, or operational record can estimate response to constraint relaxation. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A model, process map, or operational record can estimate response to constraint relaxation.", "Do not use it to justify relaxing safety, fairness, legal, privacy, or due-process constraints simply because their relaxation appears valuable."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "A model, process map, or operational record can estimate response to constraint relaxation."}, {"display_text": "A current allocation, flow, policy, or process already has an explicit objective.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: A current allocation, flow, policy, or process already has an explicit objective. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A current allocation, flow, policy, or process already has an explicit objective."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "A current allocation, flow, policy, or process already has an explicit objective."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 7, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-007", "ledger_sha256": "0c8b91ca9f9d4f1ee832030c2225b334fa7ec1fac4a42fd2c3bc9fef1b116c7a"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Bottleneck Identification and Relief", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:bottleneck_identification_and_relief", "slug": "bottleneck_identification_and_relief"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a mismatch between local activity and whole-system performance. Many parts of the system may be busy, but the final output is governed by one binding constraint. If that constraint is overloaded, starved, interrupted, or forced to redo poor-quality upstream work, the whole system inherits the delay.\n\nTypical symptoms include a growing queue before one stage, repeated expediting around one scarce decision point, underused downstream capacity, long waits for a shared tool or review, and investments in non-bottleneck speed that do not improve final delivery. These symptoms matter because they show that the system is not limited everywhere equally.\n\nThe root tension is local productivity versus system productivity. Teams naturally improve the part they control, but the flow improves only when the binding constraint changes or when work is subordinated to it.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A flow system's output, timeliness, reliability, or responsiveness is limited by a particular stage, resource, queue, role, decision point, transition, or dependency. The rest of the system may be busy, but its effort cannot translate into better whole-system results while the bottleneck remains binding."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires discrete sequential stages whose outputs become the next stage's inputs.", "role_mapping": "Pipeline stages -> dependent work stages; items -> work or cases.", "slug": "pipeline", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime requires multiple serial or parallel capacities whose global flow is set by one binding minimum.", "role_mapping": "Flow capacities -> dependent stages; global rate -> completion throughput.", "slug": "bottleneck", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b007_a13_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Work, demand, material, information, decisions, or cases move through multiple dependent stages rather than being completed independently. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Work, demand, material, information, decisions, or cases move through multiple dependent stages rather than being completed independently."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Pipeline", "one_liner": "Sequential processing stages.", "page_ref": "prime:pipeline", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Pipeline stages -> dependent work stages; items -> work or cases.", "slug": "pipeline", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires discrete sequential stages whose outputs become the next stage's inputs."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Bottleneck", "one_liner": "The single limiting stage that caps an entire system's throughput.", "page_ref": "prime:bottleneck", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Flow capacities -> dependent stages; global rate -> completion throughput.", "slug": "bottleneck", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires multiple serial or parallel capacities whose global flow is set by one binding minimum."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Work moves through multiple dependent sequential stages rather than independent completion paths.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires one limiting stage to cap the whole while other stages retain slack, producing concentrated queueing and downstream idleness.", "role_mapping": "Binding stage -> observed queue locus; slack stages -> idle downstream capacity.", "slug": "bottleneck", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b007_a13_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Queues, waiting time, missed deadlines, idle downstream capacity, or repeated escalation concentrate around a particular stage, role, machine, reviewer, interface, or transition. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Queues, waiting time, missed deadlines, idle downstream capacity, or repeated escalation concentrate around a particular stage, role, machine, reviewer, interface, or transition."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Bottleneck", "one_liner": "The single limiting stage that caps an entire system's throughput.", "page_ref": "prime:bottleneck", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Binding stage -> observed queue locus; slack stages -> idle downstream capacity.", "slug": "bottleneck", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires one limiting stage to cap the whole while other stages retain slack, producing concentrated queueing and downstream idleness."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Queues, waiting, missed deadlines, downstream idleness, or escalation concentrate around one stage or transition.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's defining minimum relation makes effort on slack elements ineffective until the binding element is relieved.", "role_mapping": "Slack-stage improvement -> local optimization; global rate -> system objective.", "slug": "bottleneck", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b007_a13_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Local improvements in non-bottleneck areas do not improve total system throughput, lead time, quality, or service level. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Local improvements in non-bottleneck areas do not improve total system throughput, lead time, quality, or service level."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Bottleneck", "one_liner": "The single limiting stage that caps an entire system's throughput.", "page_ref": "prime:bottleneck", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Slack-stage improvement -> local optimization; global rate -> system objective.", "slug": "bottleneck", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's defining minimum relation makes effort on slack elements ineffective until the binding element is relieved."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Improving non-bottleneck stages fails to improve whole-system throughput, lead time, quality, or service level.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P002-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must involve multiple operational actors or teams whose actions affect one system.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The actors are teams participating in a shared flow system.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must distinguish the actual system-limiting constraint from merely visible work.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The relevant object is the constraint that actually binds whole-system performance.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail absence of shared bottleneck identification, not merely uncertainty held by one actor.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The teams do not share an accurate view of the binding constraint.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve causal direction from constraint-visibility failure to target selection.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The missing shared view causes teams to optimize other targets.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail effort directed at locally attractive targets rather than the system constraint.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The teams optimize visible, salient, or easy local targets.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve displacement of whole-system bottleneck relief by local optimization.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The local targets are optimized instead of the constraint that limits the whole.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Teams lack a shared view of the binding constraint, causing them to optimize visible, salient, or easy local targets instead of what limits the whole.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Lack of shared bottleneck identification causes misdirected local optimization.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P002-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A bottleneck can be correctly identified and shared across the organization.", "slug": "bottleneck"}], "residual_id": "r:bottleneck_identification_and_relief:b007_a13_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b007_a13_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The system lacks a shared view of which constraint is actually binding, causing teams to optimize what is visible, politically salient, or easy rather than what limits the whole. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The system lacks a shared view of which constraint is actually binding, causing teams to optimize what is visible, politically salient, or easy rather than what limits the whole."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A bottleneck can be correctly identified and shared across the organization.", "slug": "bottleneck"}], "normalized_requirement": "Teams lack a shared view of the binding constraint and optimize visible, salient, or easy local targets instead.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Teams lack a shared view of the binding constraint and optimize visible, salient, or easy local targets instead.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a single local capacity to determine the aggregate completion rate.", "role_mapping": "Scarce stage or resource -> binding element; total completion -> global rate.", "slug": "bottleneck", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b007_a13_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A scarce expert, approval point, compute resource, testing rig, machine, legal review, clinical slot, or handoff boundary repeatedly determines how much the system can complete. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A scarce expert, approval point, compute resource, testing rig, machine, legal review, clinical slot, or handoff boundary repeatedly determines how much the system can complete."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Bottleneck", "one_liner": "The single limiting stage that caps an entire system's throughput.", "page_ref": "prime:bottleneck", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Scarce stage or resource -> binding element; total completion -> global rate.", "slug": "bottleneck", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a single local capacity to determine the aggregate completion rate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A scarce expert, approval, compute resource, test rig, machine, slot, or handoff repeatedly determines total completion rate.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 7, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-007", "ledger_sha256": "0c8b91ca9f9d4f1ee832030c2225b334fa7ec1fac4a42fd2c3bc9fef1b116c7a"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Bottleneck Power Governance", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:bottleneck_power_governance", "slug": "bottleneck_power_governance"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A monopoly is not only a firm with large share. In the abstractopedia sense, it is a **single locus controlling access to something with no close substitutes**. The locus may be a firm, platform, public office, credentialing body, facility, standard, API, logistics hub, patent, dataset, route, payment rail, app store, or expert role. Once alternatives are not credible, ordinary choice loses its disciplining effect.\n\nThe controller can then turn dependence into extraction, exclusion, delay, degradation, self-preferencing, opaque rule changes, or political influence. Affected actors may appear to consent, but their consent is constrained by the absence of workable exit.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A necessary access point is controlled by one locus, and affected actors lack close substitutes, credible exit, or enough countervailing power. The controller can extract rents, exclude rivals, degrade quality, change rules, bundle access, discriminate, self-preference, or delay without facing meaningful discipline from competition or exit."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires one controlling party with discretion over access to a determinate good, service, input, or passage.", "role_mapping": "Single controlling locus -> gatekeeper; controlled resource or channel -> needed access point.", "slug": "monopoly", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b007_a14_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A single actor, office, platform, facility, standard, supplier, right-holder, or institutional path controls access to something others need. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A single actor, office, platform, facility, standard, supplier, right-holder, or institutional path controls access to something others need."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Monopoly", "one_liner": "A single locus controls access to something for which there are no close substitutes.", "page_ref": "prime:monopoly", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Single controlling locus -> gatekeeper; controlled resource or channel -> needed access point.", "slug": "monopoly", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires one controlling party with discretion over access to a determinate good, service, input, or passage."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A single actor or institutional locus controls access to a resource, channel, standard, facility, right, or path others need.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires users to lack close substitutes because alternatives are absent or blocked by an entry barrier.", "role_mapping": "No-close-substitute condition -> unavailable alternative access.", "slug": "monopoly", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b007_a14_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Close substitutes are absent, costly, illegal, technically incompatible, socially unavailable, or too slow to develop. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Close substitutes are absent, costly, illegal, technically incompatible, socially unavailable, or too slow to develop."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Monopoly", "one_liner": "A single locus controls access to something for which there are no close substitutes.", "page_ref": "prime:monopoly", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "No-close-substitute condition -> unavailable alternative access.", "slug": "monopoly", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires users to lack close substitutes because alternatives are absent or blocked by an entry barrier."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Close substitutes are absent, blocked, incompatible, illegal, socially unavailable, or too slow to develop.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires gatekeeping discretion to price, deny, or attach conditions to access.", "role_mapping": "Gatekeeping discretion -> ability to alter access terms.", "slug": "monopoly", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime requires the less-dependent side to shift price, obligations, timing, scope, risk, or surplus toward itself.", "role_mapping": "Less-dependent party -> controller; shifted terms -> altered access conditions.", "slug": "bargaining_power", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b007_a14_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The controller can extract rents, exclude rivals, degrade quality, change rules, bundle access, discriminate, self-preference, or delay without facing meaningful discipline from competition or exit. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The controller can alter price, terms, quality, priority, visibility, permission, data access, or rule interpretation.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The controller can alter price, terms, quality, priority, visibility, permission, data access, or rule interpretation.", "The controller can extract rents, exclude rivals, degrade quality, change rules, bundle access, discriminate, self-preference, or delay without facing meaningful discipline from competition or exit."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Monopoly", "one_liner": "A single locus controls access to something for which there are no close substitutes.", "page_ref": "prime:monopoly", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Gatekeeping discretion -> ability to alter access terms.", "slug": "monopoly", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires gatekeeping discretion to price, deny, or attach conditions to access."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Bargaining Power", "one_liner": "One side can shift agreed or imposed terms toward itself because rejecting agreement is less costly to it than to its counterpart, so a disparity in credible outside options changes how jointly available surplus is divided.", "page_ref": "prime:bargaining_power", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Less-dependent party -> controller; shifted terms -> altered access conditions.", "slug": "bargaining_power", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires the less-dependent side to shift price, obligations, timing, scope, risk, or surplus toward itself."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The controller can alter price, terms, quality, priority, visibility, permission, data access, or rule interpretation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P002-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern actors whose dependence makes self-protection relevant.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The exposed role is an actor dependent on a controlled access point or counterparty.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must type exit or switching to an alternative as the protection route.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Switching would be the attempted protective mechanism.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail that switching is ineffective or unavailable as protection.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Ordinary switching cannot protect the dependent actors.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Dependent actors cannot protect themselves through ordinary switching.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Dependent actors lack protective switching.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P002-C13-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P002-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern actors whose dependence makes self-protection relevant.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The exposed role is an actor dependent on a controlled access point or counterparty.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must type negotiation or countervailing bargaining as the protection route.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Bargaining would be the attempted protective mechanism.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail that bargaining is ineffective or unavailable as protection.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Ordinary bargaining cannot protect the dependent actors.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Dependent actors cannot protect themselves through ordinary bargaining.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Dependent actors lack protective bargaining.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P002-C13-U2"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P002-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern actors whose dependence makes self-protection relevant.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The exposed role is an actor dependent on a controlled access point or counterparty.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must type competitive alternatives or discipline as the protection route.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Competition would be the attempted disciplining protection mechanism.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail that competition is ineffective or unavailable as protection.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Ordinary competition cannot protect the dependent actors.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Dependent actors cannot protect themselves through ordinary competition.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Dependent actors lack protection from competition.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P002-C13-U3"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P002-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern actors whose dependence makes self-protection relevant.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The exposed role is an actor dependent on a controlled access point or counterparty.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must type redundant capacity, paths, or suppliers as the protection route.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Redundancy would be the attempted protective mechanism.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail that redundancy is ineffective or unavailable as protection.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Ordinary redundancy cannot protect the dependent actors.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Dependent actors cannot protect themselves through ordinary redundancy.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Dependent actors lack protective redundancy.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P002-C13-U4"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Unequal outside options weaken one party but do not require every ordinary bargaining, coalition, or redundancy protection to be ineffective.", "slug": "bargaining_power"}, {"falls_short_because": "A monopoly entails no close substitute but does not necessarily eliminate coalition bargaining or protective redundancy.", "slug": "monopoly"}], "residual_id": "r:bottleneck_power_governance:b007_a14_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b007_a14_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Some single access loci are efficient, necessary, lawful, or historically accumulated, but once dependence becomes non-substitutable the controller gains power that ordinary choice, competition, and exit cannot discipline. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Dependent actors cannot protect themselves through ordinary switching, bargaining, competition, or redundancy.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Dependent actors cannot protect themselves through ordinary switching, bargaining, competition, or redundancy.", "Some single access loci are efficient, necessary, lawful, or historically accumulated, but once dependence becomes non-substitutable the controller gains power that ordinary choice, competition, and exit cannot discipline."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 4, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 4}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Unequal outside options weaken one party but do not require every ordinary bargaining, coalition, or redundancy protection to be ineffective.", "slug": "bargaining_power"}, {"falls_short_because": "A monopoly entails no close substitute but does not necessarily eliminate coalition bargaining or protective redundancy.", "slug": "monopoly"}], "normalized_requirement": "Dependent actors cannot protect themselves through ordinary switching, bargaining, competition, or redundancy.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 4 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Dependent actors cannot protect themselves through ordinary switching, bargaining, competition, or redundancy.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An unpriced third-party effect does not require a controlled bottleneck access point.", "slug": "externality"}], "residual_id": "r:bottleneck_power_governance:b007_a14_c5", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b007_a14_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A necessary access point is controlled by one locus, and affected actors lack close substitutes, credible exit, or enough countervailing power. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The access point affects public welfare, downstream markets, safety, autonomy, legitimacy, or baseline participation.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The access point affects public welfare, downstream markets, safety, autonomy, legitimacy, or baseline participation.", "A necessary access point is controlled by one locus, and affected actors lack close substitutes, credible exit, or enough countervailing power."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An unpriced third-party effect does not require a controlled bottleneck access point.", "slug": "externality"}], "normalized_requirement": "The access point affects public welfare, downstream markets, safety, autonomy, legitimacy, or baseline participation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The access point affects public welfare, downstream markets, safety, autonomy, legitimacy, or baseline participation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P002-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6", "O9"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must involve a controller able to impose harm through control of necessary access.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The harmful actor is a controller of a necessary or bottleneck access point.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail continued or recurrent harm, not a single isolated act.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The relevant harm persists over time.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail that the harm would continue if the named controls and alternatives were absent.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Persistence is asserted counterfactually under absence of countervailing mechanisms.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve absence of oversight capable of disciplining the controller.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Effective oversight is absent.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve absence of duties that compel fair or usable access.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Effective access duties are absent.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve absence of created substitutes that would discipline or bypass the controller.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "Effective substitute creation is absent.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require abuse by the controller to persist under the shared absences.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "A complete branch is persistence of controller abuse.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require exclusion from access to persist under the shared absences.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "A complete branch is persistence of exclusion.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require extraction of rents to persist under the shared absences.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "A complete branch is persistence of rent extraction.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Abuse, exclusion, or rent extraction would persist without oversight, access duties, or substitute creation.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Bottleneck-controller harm persists absent countervailing governance or substitutes.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P002-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Regulator alignment with industry does not require monopoly access or persistent controller abuse.", "slug": "regulatory_capture"}], "residual_id": "r:bottleneck_power_governance:b007_a14_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b007_a14_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "In the abstractopedia sense, it is a **single locus controlling access to something with no close substitutes**. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Abuse, exclusion, or rent extraction would persist without oversight, access duties, or substitute creation.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Abuse, exclusion, or rent extraction would persist without oversight, access duties, or substitute creation.", "In the abstractopedia sense, it is a **single locus controlling access to something with no close substitutes**."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Regulator alignment with industry does not require monopoly access or persistent controller abuse.", "slug": "regulatory_capture"}], "normalized_requirement": "Abuse, exclusion, or rent extraction would persist without oversight, access duties, or substitute creation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Abuse, exclusion, or rent extraction would persist without oversight, access duties, or substitute creation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 7, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-007", "ledger_sha256": "0c8b91ca9f9d4f1ee832030c2225b334fa7ec1fac4a42fd2c3bc9fef1b116c7a"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Bottom-Up Signal Integration", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:bottom_up_signal_integration", "slug": "bottom_up_signal_integration"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a visibility and integration gap. The people making decisions are separated from the people, places, uses, or cases where the relevant evidence appears first. Local evidence is often early and context-rich, but fragmented. Central decisions are often broad and authoritative, but blind to situated constraints.\n\nThis creates a predictable failure: the system collects anecdotes or complaints, then dismisses them because they are not yet system-level evidence. By the time the same signals appear in metrics, the cost of correction is higher.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Decision-makers operate from a high-level view that omits local constraints, weak signals, workarounds, context, or lived experience, causing plans and policies to look coherent centrally while failing or distorting at the edge."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P002-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must assign the information deficit to a central decision authority, not an arbitrary observer.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The observer is a central or senior decision-maker.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern local actors, conditions, or contexts affected by the central decision.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The unseen object is local reality at sites, users, cases, teams, communities, or equivalent affected loci.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern informational visibility from central authority toward affected local loci.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The central decision-maker has a visibility relation to the affected local reality.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail absence of direct, unmediated or firsthand visibility while allowing indirect, mediated, summarized, or otherwise extensive information.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The central decision-maker lacks direct, unmediated or firsthand visibility into the affected local reality.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must link the unseen sites, users, cases, teams, or communities to effects of the central decision.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The unseen local entities are affected by the decision-maker's decision.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Central decision-makers lack direct visibility into affected sites, users, cases, teams, or communities.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Central decision authority lacks direct visibility into affected local reality.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P002-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A distant actor may already possess a standardized representation; the prime does not require absence of local visibility.", "slug": "legibility"}], "residual_id": "r:bottom_up_signal_integration:b007_a15_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b007_a15_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Central or senior decision-makers lack direct visibility into the sites, users, cases, teams, or communities affected by the decision. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Central or senior decision-makers lack direct visibility into the sites, users, cases, teams, or communities affected by the decision."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A distant actor may already possess a standardized representation; the prime does not require absence of local visibility.", "slug": "legibility"}], "normalized_requirement": "Central decision-makers lack direct visibility into affected sites, users, cases, teams, or communities.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Central decision-makers lack direct visibility into affected sites, users, cases, teams, or communities.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires peripheral, pre-mainstream indicators whose early detection has strategic value before a trend is established.", "role_mapping": "Peripheral signals -> local exceptions and near misses; mainstream trend -> aggregate metrics.", "slug": "weak_signals_emerging_issues", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b007_a15_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Operational workarounds, local exceptions, near misses, user pain points, or community concerns appear before they are visible in aggregate metrics. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Operational workarounds, local exceptions, near misses, user pain points, or community concerns appear before they are visible in aggregate metrics."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Weak Signals & Emerging Issues", "one_liner": "Early indicators of change.", "page_ref": "prime:weak_signals_emerging_issues", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Peripheral signals -> local exceptions and near misses; mainstream trend -> aggregate metrics.", "slug": "weak_signals_emerging_issues", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires peripheral, pre-mainstream indicators whose early detection has strategic value before a trend is established."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Local workarounds, exceptions, near misses, pain points, or concerns appear before aggregate metrics register them.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P003-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must necessarily include an already-operating feedback channel receiving comment-like input.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The subject is an existing feedback channel and the received information objects are comments.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must necessarily relate the feedback channel to comments by actual collection, not merely solicitation or possible receipt.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The feedback channel collects the comments.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must necessarily entail loss of contextual information from collected comments.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The collected comments are stripped of their context.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must necessarily entail the absence of pattern validation in the feedback process.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The feedback process does not validate patterns in the comments.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must necessarily entail that the collected feedback has no effect on decisions.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The collected feedback does not change decisions.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "An existing feedback channel collects comments but either strips their context, does not validate patterns, or does not change decisions.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "an existing feedback channel collects comments but has at least one specified context-preservation, pattern-validation, or decision-effect failure", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P003-C01-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Channel-shaped recording can occur even when context is preserved and the resulting evidence changes decisions.", "slug": "elicitation_channel_contribution"}], "residual_id": "r:bottom_up_signal_integration:b007_a15_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b007_a15_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Existing feedback channels collect comments but do not preserve context, validate patterns, or affect decisions. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Existing feedback channels collect comments but do not preserve context, validate patterns, or affect decisions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Channel-shaped recording can occur even when context is preserved and the resulting evidence changes decisions.", "slug": "elicitation_channel_contribution"}], "normalized_requirement": "Existing feedback collects comments but strips context, does not validate patterns, or does not change decisions.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Existing feedback collects comments but strips context, does not validate patterns, or does not change decisions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P003-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"], ["O1", "O3"], ["O1", "O4"], ["O1", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must necessarily type the knowledge as held by actors situated locally rather than by an unspecified observer.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Local actors hold the focal knowledge.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must necessarily entail that the locally held knowledge is tacit.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The local knowledge is tacit.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must necessarily entail that the locally held knowledge is experiential.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The local knowledge is experiential.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must necessarily attach political risk to the locally held knowledge without selecting an unstated activity or requiring realized retaliation.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The local knowledge is politically risky.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must necessarily entail that knowledge granularity exceeds what standard reporting structures can carry.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The local knowledge is too granular to fit standard reporting structures.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Local actors hold knowledge that is tacit, experiential, politically risky, or too granular for standard reporting structures.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "local actors hold knowledge with at least one of four specified attributes", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P003-C02-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Standardized simplification discards residual context but does not require the local knowledge to be tacit or politically risky.", "slug": "legibility"}], "residual_id": "r:bottom_up_signal_integration:b007_a15_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b007_a15_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Local actors have knowledge that is tacit, experiential, politically risky, or too granular for standard reporting structures. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Local actors have knowledge that is tacit, experiential, politically risky, or too granular for standard reporting structures."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Tried to preserve situated learning while denying that a local participant holds experiential knowledge; the authentic-activity mechanism makes experiential competence constitutive, so the O1-O3 branch survives.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Situated Learning", "one_liner": "Treat competence as something formed and recognised inside a community of practice rather than transferred through a curriculum, so a novice learns by doing real low-stakes work at the periphery and deepening toward the centre as the community recognises their growing skill.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:situated_learning", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "situated_learning"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "situated_learning", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P003-C02-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record necessarily entails the O1-O3 experiential branch: local community participants acquire competence through authentic doing. No qualifier or favorable manifestation is added."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Tried to preserve a key-informant instance while denying locally held tacit knowledge; the exact position-knowledge coupling expressly exposes tacit conventions, so the O1-O2 branch survives.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Key Informant", "one_liner": "Gain deeper access to how a social system works by recruiting participants for their structural position — gatekeeper, broker, marginal participant, long-tenure incumbent, recent entrant — treating each account as positionally biased and structurally informative rather than population-representative.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:key_informant", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "key_informant"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "key_informant", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P003-C02-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record necessarily entails the O1-O2 tacit branch because structural position exposes a local participant to tacit conventions. The named tacit relation is constitutive, so no branch-selection guard is needed."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Local knowledge is tacit, experiential, politically risky, or too granular for standard reporting.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P003-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O5", "O6", "O7"], ["O2", "O5", "O6", "O7"], ["O3", "O5", "O6", "O7"], ["O4", "O5", "O6", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must necessarily apply to a policy as the repeatedly surprised subject.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The focal subject is a policy.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must necessarily apply to a product as the repeatedly surprised subject.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The focal subject is a product.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must necessarily apply to a process as the repeatedly surprised subject.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The focal subject is a process.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must necessarily apply to a strategy as the repeatedly surprised subject.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The focal subject is a strategy.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must necessarily include local implementation realities as the source of the mismatch.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The countervailing conditions are realities encountered during local implementation.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must necessarily entail an anticipation mismatch, not merely implementation difficulty or later adaptation.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The focal subject fails to anticipate the local implementation realities.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must necessarily entail recurrence; a single surprising implementation event does not satisfy this obligation.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The failure to anticipate occurs repeatedly.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}], "predicate": "A policy, product, process, or strategy repeatedly fails to anticipate local implementation realities.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "a policy, product, process, or strategy recurrently fails to anticipate local implementation realities", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P003-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A weak-signal scanning function can exist without prior repeated implementation surprise.", "slug": "weak_signals_emerging_issues"}], "residual_id": "r:bottom_up_signal_integration:b007_a15_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b007_a15_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A policy, product, process, or strategy is repeatedly surprised by local implementation realities. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A policy, product, process, or strategy is repeatedly surprised by local implementation realities."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A weak-signal scanning function can exist without prior repeated implementation surprise.", "slug": "weak_signals_emerging_issues"}], "normalized_requirement": "Policy, product, process, or strategy is repeatedly surprised by local implementation realities.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Policy, product, process, or strategy is repeatedly surprised by local implementation realities.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The missing operation is a context-preserving, pattern-validating path from local evidence into central decisions.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The missing operation is a context-preserving, pattern-validating path from local evidence into central decisions.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The organization needs early warning before local issues become systemic failure, reputational harm, safety risk, or adoption breakdown.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The organization needs early warning, practical implementation learning, or reality checks on central assumptions. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: The organization needs early warning before local issues become systemic failure, reputational harm, safety risk, or adoption breakdown. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The organization needs early warning before local issues become systemic failure, reputational harm, safety risk, or adoption breakdown.", "The organization needs early warning, practical implementation learning, or reality checks on central assumptions."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The organization needs early warning before local issues become systemic failure, reputational harm, safety risk, or adoption breakdown."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 7, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-007", "ledger_sha256": "0c8b91ca9f9d4f1ee832030c2225b334fa7ec1fac4a42fd2c3bc9fef1b116c7a"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Boundary-Cost Coarsening Management", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:boundary_cost_coarsening_management", "slug": "boundary_cost_coarsening_management"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A population of units is under pressure to reduce costly interfaces. Smaller units shrink, merge, dissolve, outsource, or lose contents to larger units because boundaries require energy, governance, attention, coordination, compliance, transaction costs, staffing, maintenance, or legitimacy. The system becomes easier to manage in the short term but loses microstructure, local adaptation, redundancy, competition, fine distinctions, or resilience.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A population of units is under pressure to reduce costly interfaces. Smaller units shrink, merge, dissolve, outsource, or lose contents to larger units because boundaries require energy, governance, attention, coordination, compliance, transaction costs, staffing, maintenance, or legitimacy. The system becomes easier to manage in the short term but loses microstructure, local adaptation, redundancy, competition, fine distinctions, or resilience."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a definite population of discrete units, each with a boundary.", "role_mapping": "Discrete units -> teams, suppliers, patches, categories, or physical units; unit boundary -> maintained seam.", "slug": "coarsening", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b008_a01_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The system contains many units separated by boundaries, seams, interfaces, membranes, jurisdictions, categories, teams, suppliers, patches, or ownership edges. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The system contains many units separated by boundaries, seams, interfaces, membranes, jurisdictions, categories, teams, suppliers, patches, or ownership edges."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Coarsening", "one_liner": "Boundary cost drives a population of units toward fewer and larger, content flowing small to large.", "page_ref": "prime:coarsening", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Discrete units -> teams, suppliers, patches, categories, or physical units; unit boundary -> maintained seam.", "slug": "coarsening", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a definite population of discrete units, each with a boundary."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The system contains a population of units separated by maintained boundaries or interfaces.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a definite per-unit boundary cost with surface scaling distinct from content volume.", "role_mapping": "Boundary cost -> maintenance overhead; surface scaling -> boundary count or interface area.", "slug": "coarsening", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime requires a continuously held cost per unit boundary area rather than per bulk volume.", "role_mapping": "Per-area cost -> interface maintenance cost.", "slug": "interfacial_energy", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b008_a01_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Maintaining those boundaries has a measurable cost that scales with boundary count or interface area rather than only with bulk size. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Maintaining those boundaries has a measurable cost that scales with boundary count or interface area rather than only with bulk size."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Coarsening", "one_liner": "Boundary cost drives a population of units toward fewer and larger, content flowing small to large.", "page_ref": "prime:coarsening", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Boundary cost -> maintenance overhead; surface scaling -> boundary count or interface area.", "slug": "coarsening", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a definite per-unit boundary cost with surface scaling distinct from content volume."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Interfacial Energy", "one_liner": "A per-unit-boundary cost that scales with seam length rather than bulk, driving systems toward configurations with less total boundary unless opposed.", "page_ref": "prime:interfacial_energy", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Per-area cost -> interface maintenance cost.", "slug": "interfacial_energy", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a continuously held cost per unit boundary area rather than per bulk volume."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Maintaining boundaries has a measurable cost that scales with boundary count or interface area rather than bulk size.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires smaller units to pay greater boundary cost per content and to transfer content toward larger units.", "role_mapping": "Small-unit penalty -> apparent large-unit advantage; transport -> attraction of flux.", "slug": "coarsening", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b008_a01_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Larger units have an apparent advantage because they amortize boundary overhead, attract flux from smaller units, or reduce transaction costs. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Larger units have an apparent advantage because they amortize boundary overhead, attract flux from smaller units, or reduce transaction costs."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Coarsening", "one_liner": "Boundary cost drives a population of units toward fewer and larger, content flowing small to large.", "page_ref": "prime:coarsening", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Small-unit penalty -> apparent large-unit advantage; transport -> attraction of flux.", "slug": "coarsening", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires smaller units to pay greater boundary cost per content and to transfer content toward larger units."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Larger units gain because boundary overhead is amortized or content flows from small units toward them.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires drift toward fewer and larger units as content moves from small units into large ones.", "role_mapping": "Small-unit loss -> disappearance or hollowing; larger-unit gain -> growth or merger.", "slug": "coarsening", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b008_a01_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Smaller units are disappearing, merging, being absorbed, or becoming hollow while larger units grow. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Smaller units are disappearing, merging, being absorbed, or becoming hollow while larger units grow."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Coarsening", "one_liner": "Boundary cost drives a population of units toward fewer and larger, content flowing small to large.", "page_ref": "prime:coarsening", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Small-unit loss -> disappearance or hollowing; larger-unit gain -> growth or merger.", "slug": "coarsening", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires drift toward fewer and larger units as content moves from small units into large ones."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Smaller units disappear, merge, are absorbed, or become hollow while larger units grow.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Boundary-cost-driven consolidation is value-neutral and does not require undercounted benefits from the finer structure.", "slug": "coarsening"}], "residual_id": "r:boundary_cost_coarsening_management:b008_a01_c5", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b008_a01_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The value of preserved small-unit structure is real but undercounted because it appears as resilience, diversity, local knowledge, optionality, or future adaptability. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The value of preserved small-unit structure is real but undercounted because it appears as resilience, diversity, local knowledge, optionality, or future adaptability."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Boundary-cost-driven consolidation is value-neutral and does not require undercounted benefits from the finer structure.", "slug": "coarsening"}], "normalized_requirement": "The resilience, diversity, local knowledge, optionality, or adaptability value of small-unit structure is real but undercounted.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The resilience, diversity, local knowledge, optionality, or adaptability value of small-unit structure is real but undercounted.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime can be kinetically reversible and does not require an expensive reconstruction threshold.", "slug": "coarsening"}], "residual_id": "r:boundary_cost_coarsening_management:b008_a01_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b008_a01_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: There is a risk of crossing a threshold after which re-creating small units is expensive or impossible. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["There is a risk of crossing a threshold after which re-creating small units is expensive or impossible."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime can be kinetically reversible and does not require an expensive reconstruction threshold.", "slug": "coarsening"}], "normalized_requirement": "Further coarsening risks a threshold beyond which recreating small units is expensive or impossible.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Further coarsening risks a threshold beyond which recreating small units is expensive or impossible.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 8, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-008", "ledger_sha256": "23c5493b243dda7f5de441095557263d00cfe02f1c6072d8f67453bfa93d4498"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Boundary Critique Audit", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:boundary_critique_audit", "slug": "boundary_critique_audit"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 6, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is boundary-shaped invisibility. A line that appears natural, practical, technical, legal, or neutral is quietly deciding what counts as evidence, who counts as affected, which costs count as internal, and who is treated as responsible.\n\nThis invisibility can arise from organizational charts, budget lines, legal jurisdictions, data sets, model assumptions, professional disciplines, service definitions, grant scopes, policy categories, or measurement systems. Those lines can be useful. The problem appears when they are treated as facts rather than choices, and when their exclusions materially shape diagnosis, responsibility, risk, legitimacy, or remedy.\n\nThe audit is needed because a boundary can be wrong in more than one way. It may exclude a stakeholder. It may exclude a time horizon. It may exclude a downstream cost. It may exclude an upstream cause. It may exclude an inconvenient data source. It may exclude the authority needed to act. Boundary Critique Audit creates a disciplined way to ask which of these exclusions are harmless simplifications and which are consequential blind spots.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A boundary appears natural or neutral but may be shaping analysis, responsibility, measurement, or intervention by hiding consequential exclusions, assumptions, stakeholders, harms, costs, benefits, or evidence."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Boundary critique makes the boundary explicit and revisable rather than treating it as settled.", "slug": "boundary_critique"}], "residual_id": "r:boundary_critique_audit:b008_a02_c1", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_AMBIGUITY", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b008_a02_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A system, project, model, policy, service, metric, jurisdiction, or responsibility boundary is already in use and is treated as obvious or settled. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A system, project, model, policy, service, metric, jurisdiction, or responsibility boundary is already in use and is treated as obvious or settled."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Boundary critique makes the boundary explicit and revisable rather than treating it as settled.", "slug": "boundary_critique"}], "normalized_requirement": "An operative system or responsibility boundary is treated as obvious or settled.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_AMBIGUITY", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "An operative system or responsibility boundary is treated as obvious or settled.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P003-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must necessarily include an official analytic or decision frame with an inclusion boundary.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "There is an official frame that determines what is inside or outside scope.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must necessarily express exclusion from the official frame, not mere distance, disagreement, or lack of participation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A consequential element sits outside the official frame.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must support possible or suspected exclusion and must not require that exclusion has already been established.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The exclusion is possible or suspected rather than certain.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must allow an actor affected by the framed system as the excluded role.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The excluded element is an affected actor.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must allow a downstream maintenance role as the excluded role.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The excluded element is a downstream maintainer.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must allow a population kept outside the official frame as the excluded role.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The excluded element is an excluded population.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must allow an externalized harm, rather than only a person or organization, as the excluded element.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The excluded element is an externalized harm.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}], "predicate": "An affected actor, downstream maintainer, excluded population, or externalized harm may sit outside the official frame.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "a consequential actor, population, or harm may be excluded by the official frame", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P003-C04-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Status equality and recognition concerns do not require exclusion by a system-analysis boundary.", "slug": "recognition_justice"}], "residual_id": "r:boundary_critique_audit:b008_a02_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b008_a02_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Affected actors, downstream maintainers, excluded populations, or externalized harms are suspected to sit outside the official frame. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Affected actors, downstream maintainers, excluded populations, or externalized harms are suspected to sit outside the official frame."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Status equality and recognition concerns do not require exclusion by a system-analysis boundary.", "slug": "recognition_justice"}], "normalized_requirement": "Affected actors, maintainers, excluded populations, or externalized harms may sit outside the official frame.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Affected actors, maintainers, excluded populations, or externalized harms may sit outside the official frame.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P003-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O7", "O11"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O8", "O11"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O9", "O11"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O10", "O11"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5", "O7", "O11"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5", "O8", "O11"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5", "O9", "O11"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5", "O10", "O11"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6", "O7", "O11"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6", "O8", "O11"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6", "O9", "O11"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6", "O10", "O11"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must necessarily concern a success claim whose scope is local rather than an unscoped outcome.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The focal evaluative object is a local success claim.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve possible dependence and must not require that the dependence has been conclusively established.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The local success claim may depend on the burden transfer.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must necessarily express cross-boundary burden transfer linked to the apparent local success.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A burden is shifted beyond the boundary used to evaluate the local success.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For a cost branch, a candidate must necessarily permit costs as the transferred burden.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The shifted burden is a cost.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For a risk branch, a candidate must necessarily permit risks as the transferred burden.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The shifted burden is a risk.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For a labor branch, a candidate must necessarily permit labor demands as the transferred burden.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The shifted burden is labor.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this destination branch, a candidate must necessarily permit transfer across system boundaries.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The burden is shifted to another system.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this destination branch, a candidate must necessarily permit temporal displacement into another time horizon.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The burden is shifted to another time horizon.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this destination branch, a candidate must necessarily permit transfer across community boundaries.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "The burden is shifted to another community.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this destination branch, a candidate must necessarily permit transfer across institutional boundaries.", "obligation_id": "O10", "statement": "The burden is shifted to another institution.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must necessarily entail that the transferred burden is left out of account in evaluating the local success, not merely that the transfer is acknowledged.", "obligation_id": "O11", "statement": "The shifted burden is ignored or excluded from the evaluation supporting the local success claim.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "A local success claim may depend on ignoring a cost, risk, or labor burden shifted to another system, time horizon, community, or institution.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "a local success claim may depend on excluding a cross-boundary burden transfer from its evaluation", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P003-C05-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Moving risk after an intervention does not require a local success claim or shifted labor and cost.", "slug": "risk_migration"}], "residual_id": "r:boundary_critique_audit:b008_a02_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b008_a02_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A local success claim may depend on ignoring costs, risks, or labor shifted to another system, time horizon, community, or institution. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A local success claim may depend on ignoring costs, risks, or labor shifted to another system, time horizon, community, or institution."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Moving risk after an intervention does not require a local success claim or shifted labor and cost.", "slug": "risk_migration"}], "normalized_requirement": "A local success claim may depend on shifting costs, risks, or labor across systems, time horizons, communities, or institutions.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A local success claim may depend on shifting costs, risks, or labor across systems, time horizons, communities, or institutions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P003-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O9"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O10"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must necessarily apply to a boundary that scopes a decision, not merely to any inherited convention.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The focal object is a boundary used for a particular decision.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must necessarily entail provenance by inheritance from the listed substrate, without requiring that substrate to be external to the organization or system.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The boundary is inherited from one of the listed pre-existing substrates.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must necessarily preserve the absence of decision-specific justification; generic justification is insufficient.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The boundary was not justified for the focal decision.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must permit an org chart as the inheritance source.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The inheritance source is an org chart.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must permit a budget as the inheritance source.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The inheritance source is a budget.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must permit a data set as the inheritance source.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The inheritance source is a data set.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must permit a discipline as the inheritance source.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The inheritance source is a discipline.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must permit a legal jurisdiction as the inheritance source.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The inheritance source is a legal jurisdiction.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must permit a platform policy as the inheritance source.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "The inheritance source is a platform policy.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must permit a model as the inheritance source.", "obligation_id": "O10", "statement": "The inheritance source is a model.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}], "predicate": "The boundary was inherited from an org chart, budget, data set, discipline, legal jurisdiction, platform policy, or model rather than justified for the decision at hand.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "a decision boundary is inherited from a pre-existing listed substrate instead of justified for the focal decision", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P003-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An audit can examine a boundary that was explicitly justified rather than merely inherited.", "slug": "boundary_critique"}], "residual_id": "r:boundary_critique_audit:b008_a02_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b008_a02_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The boundary has been inherited from an org chart, budget, data set, discipline, legal jurisdiction, platform policy, or model rather than justified for the decision at hand. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The boundary has been inherited from an org chart, budget, data set, discipline, legal jurisdiction, platform policy, or model rather than justified for the decision at hand."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An audit can examine a boundary that was explicitly justified rather than merely inherited.", "slug": "boundary_critique"}], "normalized_requirement": "The boundary was inherited from an organizational, budgetary, data, disciplinary, legal, platform, or model substrate rather than justified for this decision.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The boundary was inherited from an organizational, budgetary, data, disciplinary, legal, platform, or model substrate rather than justified for this decision.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P003-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must necessarily include stakeholders in disagreement, not merely an analyst's uncertainty about a boundary.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Multiple stakeholders are the parties to the disagreement.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must necessarily concern inside-versus-outside membership in a system frame.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The disputed reference frame is a system boundary.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must necessarily entail disagreement over boundary membership, not merely disagreement about the subject's value or description.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Stakeholders disagree about whether the focal subject belongs inside the system boundary.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must necessarily preserve the absence of systematic examination; an actively audited disagreement does not satisfy it.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The boundary disagreement has not been examined systematically.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must require a stakeholder whose membership inside the system boundary is disputed.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The disputed subject is a stakeholder.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must permit an effect as the subject of boundary disagreement.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The disputed subject is an effect.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must permit a cause as the subject of boundary disagreement.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The disputed subject is a cause.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must permit responsibility as the subject of boundary disagreement.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The disputed subject is a responsibility.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}], "predicate": "Stakeholders disagree about whether a stakeholder, effect, cause, or responsibility belongs inside the system boundary, and the boundary disagreement remains unexamined.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "stakeholders have an unexamined disagreement about system-boundary membership", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P003-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A boundary-critique episode systematically examines precisely this disagreement, so it does not entail that it remains unexamined.", "slug": "boundary_critique"}], "residual_id": "r:boundary_critique_audit:b008_a02_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b008_a02_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: There is disagreement about whether a stakeholder, effect, cause, or responsibility belongs inside the system, but the disagreement has not been examined systematically. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["There is disagreement about whether a stakeholder, effect, cause, or responsibility belongs inside the system, but the disagreement has not been examined systematically."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A boundary-critique episode systematically examines precisely this disagreement, so it does not entail that it remains unexamined.", "slug": "boundary_critique"}], "normalized_requirement": "Stakeholders disagree about inclusion, effect, cause, or responsibility, and the boundary disagreement remains unexamined.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Stakeholders disagree about inclusion, effect, cause, or responsibility, and the boundary disagreement remains unexamined.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The existing boundary's exclusions are capable of reversing or materially qualifying the current success or responsibility claim.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The existing boundary's exclusions are capable of reversing or materially qualifying the current success or responsibility claim.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A proposed Boundary Reframing or Externality Internalization move needs evidence about what the current boundary hides before acting.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful before Boundary Reframing, because it supplies evidence for why the boundary should be changed. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: A proposed Boundary Reframing or Externality Internalization move needs evidence about what the current boundary hides before acting. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A proposed Boundary Reframing or Externality Internalization move needs evidence about what the current boundary hides before acting.", "It is especially useful before Boundary Reframing, because it supplies evidence for why the boundary should be changed."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "A proposed Boundary Reframing or Externality Internalization move needs evidence about what the current boundary hides before acting."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 8, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-008", "ledger_sha256": "23c5493b243dda7f5de441095557263d00cfe02f1c6072d8f67453bfa93d4498"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Boundary-Embedded Disclosure Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:boundary_embedded_disclosure_design", "slug": "boundary_embedded_disclosure_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Artifacts that move across boundaries shed the context, validation conditions, provenance, assumptions, license terms, safety limits, or operating constraints that made them meaningful. Consumers then rely on the artifact as if it were self-explanatory, current, transferable, and complete.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Artifacts that move across boundaries shed the context, validation conditions, provenance, assumptions, license terms, safety limits, or operating constraints that made them meaningful. Consumers then rely on the artifact as if it were self-explanatory, current, transferable, and complete."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires rich state to cross to a different carrier through a bounded artifact.", "role_mapping": "Source carrier -> producer context; receiver carrier -> reuse context; transfer artifact -> reused artifact.", "slug": "boundary_state_loss", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b008_a03_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Artifact crosses a reuse boundary. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Artifact crosses a reuse boundary"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Boundary State Loss", "one_liner": "State crossing a carrier boundary through a bounded artifact is constitutively reduced, surfacing later as failure.", "page_ref": "prime:boundary_state_loss", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source carrier -> producer context; receiver carrier -> reuse context; transfer artifact -> reused artifact.", "slug": "boundary_state_loss", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires rich state to cross to a different carrier through a bounded artifact."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "An artifact crosses a carrier or reuse boundary into a context that cannot inspect its full production state.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A human-readable overlay need not be optional or bypassed at reuse.", "slug": "explanatory_overlay_masking_structural_debt"}], "residual_id": "r:boundary_embedded_disclosure_design:b008_a03_c2", "residual_kind": "CONTINGENT_FACT", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b008_a03_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Reliance can occur without reading full documentation. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Reliance can occur without reading full documentation"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A human-readable overlay need not be optional or bypassed at reuse.", "slug": "explanatory_overlay_masking_structural_debt"}], "normalized_requirement": "Consumers can rely on or use the artifact without reading its full documentation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "CONTINGENT_FACT", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Consumers can rely on or use the artifact without reading its full documentation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires constitutive loss of tacit or contextual state at transfer and delayed downstream failure from the missing content.", "role_mapping": "Missing contextual content -> stripped context; delayed failure -> misuse risk.", "slug": "boundary_state_loss", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b008_a03_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Misuse risk comes from stripped context. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Misuse risk comes from stripped context"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Boundary State Loss", "one_liner": "State crossing a carrier boundary through a bounded artifact is constitutively reduced, surfacing later as failure.", "page_ref": "prime:boundary_state_loss", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Missing contextual content -> stripped context; delayed failure -> misuse risk.", "slug": "boundary_state_loss", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires constitutive loss of tacit or contextual state at transfer and delayed downstream failure from the missing content."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Misuse or downstream failure arises because contextual state is stripped during transfer.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P003-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must necessarily include multiple audiences in total, with producer and consumer roles both represented, without requiring multiple audiences separately on each side.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The principal parties are multiple audiences spanning producer and consumer roles.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must necessarily type the required object as one shared interaction contract, not separate audience-specific guidance.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The required object is an interaction contract shared across the audiences.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must necessarily entail need or requirement, not merely the possible usefulness or actual existence of a contract.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The audiences require the shared interaction contract.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must necessarily relate one contract to cross-audience interaction rather than to only one side.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The same contract coordinates interactions across producer and consumer audiences.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must necessarily preserve contract stability rather than permit an ad hoc or one-time agreement.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The shared interaction contract is stable over relevant interactions.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "Multiple producer and consumer audiences require a stable shared interaction contract.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "multiple producer and consumer audiences require one shared interaction contract", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P003-C08-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A stable contract-bearing interface is the desired apparatus and does not entail that the cross-audience contract is still missing.", "slug": "interface"}, {"falls_short_because": "A disclosure card is the proposed contract-bearing intervention, not an independent antecedent trigger.", "slug": "boundary_disclosure_card"}], "residual_id": "r:boundary_embedded_disclosure_design:b008_a03_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b008_a03_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Multiple audiences need a shared contract. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Multiple audiences need a shared contract"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Tried to preserve a recognized genre while making its producer-audience expectations ad hoc or one-sided; that contradicts the recurring conventions and stable mutual expectations constitutive of the exact record.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Genre", "one_liner": "A historically evolving cluster of cultural artifacts whose recurring conventions set up a contract between producer and audience — an inherited craft toolkit on one side, a reading strategy and evaluative horizon on the other — shaping both how works are made and how they are judged.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:genre", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "genre"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "genre", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P003-C08-U1", "why_it_fits": "A genre necessarily supplies multiple producer/consumer parties and one recurring, stable producer-audience contract that governs production and reception, satisfying the complete non-disjunctive branch directly."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Multiple producer and consumer audiences require a stable shared interaction contract.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Boundary payload is essential but compactable.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: Boundary payload is essential but compactable. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Boundary payload is essential but compactable"]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Boundary payload is essential but compactable"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 8, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-008", "ledger_sha256": "23c5493b243dda7f5de441095557263d00cfe02f1c6072d8f67453bfa93d4498"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Boundary Permeability Control", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:boundary_permeability_control", "slug": "boundary_permeability_control"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 2, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 2 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is all-or-nothing or poorly discriminating boundary behavior. A fully open boundary exposes the system to harm. A fully closed boundary starves it of needed exchange. A crude boundary admits and blocks the wrong things because it cannot distinguish risk, value, legitimacy, urgency, sensitivity, or compatibility.\n\nThis creates characteristic symptoms: repeated intrusion or leakage, overloaded intake queues, inconsistent frontline decisions, harmful bypasses, service denial, contamination, unsafe data import, and brittle gates that cannot adapt as conditions change.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system boundary is too open, too closed, or too indiscriminate relative to the exchange the system needs and the harms it must prevent."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Carrier-specific passage is value-neutral and need not include both necessary and harmful flows.", "slug": "permeability"}], "residual_id": "r:boundary_permeability_control:b008_a04_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b008_a04_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Necessary flows and harmful flows arrive through the same boundary, channel, queue, port, doorway, policy, interface, or relationship. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Necessary flows and harmful flows arrive through the same boundary, channel, queue, port, doorway, policy, interface, or relationship."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Carrier-specific passage is value-neutral and need not include both necessary and harmful flows.", "slug": "permeability"}], "normalized_requirement": "Necessary and harmful flows use the same boundary or crossing channel.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Necessary and harmful flows use the same boundary or crossing channel.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a constrained quantity to exit through an unintended boundary pathway with system loss.", "role_mapping": "Unintended pathway -> harmful crossing; system loss -> intrusion or exposure harm.", "slug": "escape_and_leakage", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b008_a04_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The system is harmed by intrusion, leakage, contamination, abuse, malformed input, untrusted actors, runaway requests, information exposure, or unreviewed crossing. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The system is harmed by intrusion, leakage, contamination, abuse, malformed input, untrusted actors, runaway requests, information exposure, or unreviewed crossing."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Escape and Leakage", "one_liner": "Constrained quantities exit through unintended pathways.", "page_ref": "prime:escape_and_leakage", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Unintended pathway -> harmful crossing; system loss -> intrusion or exposure harm.", "slug": "escape_and_leakage", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a constrained quantity to exit through an unintended boundary pathway with system loss."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Unintended intrusion, leakage, contamination, abuse, malformed input, or exposure crosses the boundary and harms the system.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P003-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O9"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must necessarily apply to objects crossing a boundary, not to undifferentiated internal objects.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The focal objects are carriers or objects attempting to cross a system boundary.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must necessarily entail inadequacy of binary access relative to more differentiated handling.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A binary yes-or-no access decision is insufficient for the required handling.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve possible need for differentiated handling and must not require that a categorical need has already been established.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "At least one carrier-specific handling operation may be required.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must permit possible inspection differentiated by the crossing carrier.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Crossing objects may require carrier-specific inspection.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must permit possible transformation differentiated by the crossing carrier.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Crossing objects may require carrier-specific transformation.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must permit possible quarantine differentiated by the crossing carrier.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "Crossing objects may require carrier-specific quarantine.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must permit possible prioritization differentiated by the crossing carrier.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "Crossing objects may require carrier-specific prioritization.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must permit possible throttling differentiated by the crossing carrier.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "Crossing objects may require carrier-specific throttling.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must permit possible routing differentiated by the crossing carrier.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "Crossing objects may require carrier-specific routing.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "A simple yes-or-no access decision is insufficient because crossing objects may need carrier-specific inspection, transformation, quarantine, prioritization, throttling, or routing.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "binary boundary access is insufficient because crossing objects may require differentiated handling", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P003-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A graded per-carrier selectivity profile is the desired control capability, not evidence that the current boundary remains binary and inadequate.", "slug": "permeability"}], "residual_id": "r:boundary_permeability_control:b008_a04_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b008_a04_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A simple yes/no access decision is insufficient because crossing objects may need inspection, transformation, quarantine, prioritization, throttling, or routing. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A simple yes/no access decision is insufficient because crossing objects may need inspection, transformation, quarantine, prioritization, throttling, or routing."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Tried to preserve injection weakness while making binary access sufficient; the exact record says authorized access can succeed and interpreter-specific inertization is still required, so the transformation branch remains true.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Injection Weakness", "one_liner": "The software-security failure in which untrusted data crosses into a control channel and a downstream interpreter executes it as command, query, or instruction — a collapse of the data/control boundary that a legitimate, often credential-free, input channel is enough to exploit.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:injection_weakness", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "injection_weakness"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "injection_weakness", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P003-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "Injection weakness necessarily shows that authorized binary access is insufficient for crossing data and that interpreter-specific transformation or inertization may be required, satisfying the O5 branch directly."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Tried to preserve rate-limit absence while making binary endpoint access sufficient; the exact record's absent per-source budget necessarily leaves carrier-specific throttling required.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Rate-Limit Absence", "one_liner": "Diagnose a whole family of endpoint abuses as one defect — a callable action left uncapped whose per-invocation cost to the service far exceeds the attacker's, so no enforced per-source budget separates legitimate demand from adversarial demand driven at machine speed.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:rate_limit_absence", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "rate_limit_absence"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "rate_limit_absence", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P003-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "Rate-limit absence necessarily shows that binary endpoint access is insufficient and per-source throttling may be required for crossing invocations, satisfying the O8 branch directly."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Tried to preserve excessive data exposure while making endpoint authorization sufficient; the exact record still requires role-scoped producer projection of the crossing payload.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Excessive Data Exposure", "one_liner": "An API endpoint returns more fields than the caller's role requires, trusting a client-side filter to hide the surplus — but the unfiltered payload is already on the wire, so the surplus must be stripped at the producer via role-scoped projection.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:excessive_data_exposure", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "excessive_data_exposure"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "excessive_data_exposure", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P003-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "Excessive data exposure necessarily shows that endpoint authorization is insufficient and the crossing payload requires role-specific producer-side transformation, satisfying the O5 branch directly."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Carrier-specific inspection, transformation, quarantine, prioritization, throttling, or routing is needed beyond binary access.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P003-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must necessarily involve current boundary-crossing rules and at least two crossing attempts or classes.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Current rules govern multiple attempts to cross a boundary.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must necessarily entail equivalence of treatment under the rules, not merely shared eligibility or common location.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The rules treat the different crossing attempts as equivalent.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must necessarily entail a material, not trivial, difference between attempts despite their equivalent treatment.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The crossing attempts differ materially on at least one relevant dimension.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must permit risk as the dimension of material difference.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The material difference is in risk.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must permit legitimacy as the dimension of material difference.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The material difference is in legitimacy.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must permit urgency as the dimension of material difference.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The material difference is in urgency.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must permit usefulness as the dimension of material difference.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The material difference is in usefulness.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}], "predicate": "Current crossing rules treat attempts as equivalent despite material differences in risk, legitimacy, urgency, or usefulness.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "boundary rules collapse materially different crossing attempts into equivalent treatment", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P003-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Selective permeability can already distinguish carrier classes and does not require equivalence under current rules.", "slug": "permeability"}], "residual_id": "r:boundary_permeability_control:b008_a04_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b008_a04_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Current rules treat different crossing attempts as equivalent even though their risk, legitimacy, urgency, or usefulness differs materially. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Current rules treat different crossing attempts as equivalent even though their risk, legitimacy, urgency, or usefulness differs materially."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Selective permeability can already distinguish carrier classes and does not require equivalence under current rules.", "slug": "permeability"}], "normalized_requirement": "Current crossing rules treat attempts as equivalent despite material differences in risk, legitimacy, urgency, or usefulness.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Current crossing rules treat attempts as equivalent despite material differences in risk, legitimacy, urgency, or usefulness.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Carrier-specific passage is value-neutral and need not include both necessary and harmful flows.", "slug": "permeability"}], "residual_id": "r:boundary_permeability_control:b008_a04_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b008_a04_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Necessary flows and harmful flows arrive through the same boundary, channel, queue, port, doorway, policy, interface, or relationship. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Necessary flows and harmful flows arrive through the same boundary, channel, queue, port, doorway, policy, interface, or relationship."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Carrier-specific passage is value-neutral and need not include both necessary and harmful flows.", "slug": "permeability"}], "normalized_requirement": "Necessary and harmful flows use the same boundary or crossing channel.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Necessary and harmful flows use the same boundary or crossing channel.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A permeable medium lies between sealed and open but does not require a prior over-sealing failure.", "slug": "permeability"}], "residual_id": "r:boundary_permeability_control:b008_a04_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b008_a04_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A boundary has been sealed so tightly that the system loses learning, resources, service access, collaboration, interoperability, or timely response. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A boundary has been sealed so tightly that the system loses learning, resources, service access, collaboration, interoperability, or timely response."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A permeable medium lies between sealed and open but does not require a prior over-sealing failure.", "slug": "permeability"}], "normalized_requirement": "Over-sealing the boundary suppresses needed learning, resources, service, collaboration, interoperability, or response.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Over-sealing the boundary suppresses needed learning, resources, service, collaboration, interoperability, or response.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P003-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O9"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must necessarily apply to objects crossing a boundary, not to undifferentiated internal objects.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The focal objects are carriers or objects attempting to cross a system boundary.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must necessarily entail inadequacy of binary access relative to more differentiated handling.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A binary yes-or-no access decision is insufficient for the required handling.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve possible need for differentiated handling and must not require that a categorical need has already been established.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "At least one carrier-specific handling operation may be required.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must permit possible inspection differentiated by the crossing carrier.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Crossing objects may require carrier-specific inspection.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must permit possible transformation differentiated by the crossing carrier.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Crossing objects may require carrier-specific transformation.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must permit possible quarantine differentiated by the crossing carrier.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "Crossing objects may require carrier-specific quarantine.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must permit possible prioritization differentiated by the crossing carrier.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "Crossing objects may require carrier-specific prioritization.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must permit possible throttling differentiated by the crossing carrier.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "Crossing objects may require carrier-specific throttling.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must permit possible routing differentiated by the crossing carrier.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "Crossing objects may require carrier-specific routing.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "A simple yes-or-no access decision is insufficient because crossing objects may need carrier-specific inspection, transformation, quarantine, prioritization, throttling, or routing.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "binary boundary access is insufficient because crossing objects may require differentiated handling", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P003-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A graded per-carrier selectivity profile is the desired control capability, not evidence that the current boundary remains binary and inadequate.", "slug": "permeability"}], "residual_id": "r:boundary_permeability_control:b008_a04_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b008_a04_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A simple yes/no access decision is insufficient because crossing objects may need inspection, transformation, quarantine, prioritization, throttling, or routing. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A simple yes/no access decision is insufficient because crossing objects may need inspection, transformation, quarantine, prioritization, throttling, or routing."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Tried to preserve injection weakness while making binary access sufficient; the exact record says authorized access can succeed and interpreter-specific inertization is still required, so the transformation branch remains true.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Injection Weakness", "one_liner": "The software-security failure in which untrusted data crosses into a control channel and a downstream interpreter executes it as command, query, or instruction — a collapse of the data/control boundary that a legitimate, often credential-free, input channel is enough to exploit.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:injection_weakness", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "injection_weakness"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "injection_weakness", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P003-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "Injection weakness necessarily shows that authorized binary access is insufficient for crossing data and that interpreter-specific transformation or inertization may be required, satisfying the O5 branch directly."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Tried to preserve rate-limit absence while making binary endpoint access sufficient; the exact record's absent per-source budget necessarily leaves carrier-specific throttling required.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Rate-Limit Absence", "one_liner": "Diagnose a whole family of endpoint abuses as one defect — a callable action left uncapped whose per-invocation cost to the service far exceeds the attacker's, so no enforced per-source budget separates legitimate demand from adversarial demand driven at machine speed.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:rate_limit_absence", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "rate_limit_absence"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "rate_limit_absence", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P003-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "Rate-limit absence necessarily shows that binary endpoint access is insufficient and per-source throttling may be required for crossing invocations, satisfying the O8 branch directly."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Tried to preserve excessive data exposure while making endpoint authorization sufficient; the exact record still requires role-scoped producer projection of the crossing payload.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Excessive Data Exposure", "one_liner": "An API endpoint returns more fields than the caller's role requires, trusting a client-side filter to hide the surplus — but the unfiltered payload is already on the wire, so the surplus must be stripped at the producer via role-scoped projection.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:excessive_data_exposure", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "excessive_data_exposure"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "excessive_data_exposure", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P003-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "Excessive data exposure necessarily shows that endpoint authorization is insufficient and the crossing payload requires role-specific producer-side transformation, satisfying the O5 branch directly."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Carrier-specific inspection, transformation, quarantine, prioritization, throttling, or routing is needed beyond binary access.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P003-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must necessarily involve current boundary-crossing rules and at least two crossing attempts or classes.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Current rules govern multiple attempts to cross a boundary.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must necessarily entail equivalence of treatment under the rules, not merely shared eligibility or common location.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The rules treat the different crossing attempts as equivalent.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must necessarily entail a material, not trivial, difference between attempts despite their equivalent treatment.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The crossing attempts differ materially on at least one relevant dimension.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must permit risk as the dimension of material difference.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The material difference is in risk.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must permit legitimacy as the dimension of material difference.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The material difference is in legitimacy.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must permit urgency as the dimension of material difference.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The material difference is in urgency.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must permit usefulness as the dimension of material difference.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The material difference is in usefulness.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}], "predicate": "Current crossing rules treat attempts as equivalent despite material differences in risk, legitimacy, urgency, or usefulness.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "boundary rules collapse materially different crossing attempts into equivalent treatment", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P003-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Selective permeability can already distinguish carrier classes and does not require equivalence under current rules.", "slug": "permeability"}], "residual_id": "r:boundary_permeability_control:b008_a04_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b008_a04_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Current rules treat different crossing attempts as equivalent even though their risk, legitimacy, urgency, or usefulness differs materially. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Current rules treat different crossing attempts as equivalent even though their risk, legitimacy, urgency, or usefulness differs materially."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Selective permeability can already distinguish carrier classes and does not require equivalence under current rules.", "slug": "permeability"}], "normalized_requirement": "Current crossing rules treat attempts as equivalent despite material differences in risk, legitimacy, urgency, or usefulness.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Current crossing rules treat attempts as equivalent despite material differences in risk, legitimacy, urgency, or usefulness.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The same boundary must serve multiple purposes: safety, exchange, fairness, privacy, capacity management, accountability, and responsiveness.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A fully closed boundary starves it of needed exchange. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: The same boundary must serve multiple purposes: safety, exchange, fairness, privacy, capacity management, accountability, and responsiveness. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The same boundary must serve multiple purposes: safety, exchange, fairness, privacy, capacity management, accountability, and responsiveness.", "A fully closed boundary starves it of needed exchange."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The same boundary must serve multiple purposes: safety, exchange, fairness, privacy, capacity management, accountability, and responsiveness."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 8, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-008", "ledger_sha256": "23c5493b243dda7f5de441095557263d00cfe02f1c6072d8f67453bfa93d4498"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Boundary Reframing", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:boundary_reframing", "slug": "boundary_reframing"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is **misleading system scope**. A boundary has already been chosen, often tacitly. That boundary makes the problem tractable, but it also excludes something that changes the diagnosis or intervention.\n\nA narrow boundary may hide upstream causes, downstream harms, maintenance burden, excluded communities, future costs, or cross-system feedback. An overbroad boundary may diffuse responsibility so badly that no one can act. A misplaced boundary may center the visible symptom rather than the subsystem that controls it.\n\nThe root tension is that all boundaries exclude. Exclusion is not automatically wrong; it is what makes action possible. Boundary Reframing becomes necessary when the exclusions are material enough that the old frame produces false confidence, bad accountability, ineffective solutions, or exported harm.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "The chosen frame excludes elements whose inclusion would materially change diagnosis, responsibility, risk assessment, or solution design."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P003-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must necessarily apply to a current problem-scoping boundary rather than any organizational perimeter.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The excluding structure is the current problem boundary.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must necessarily entail directed exclusion by the problem boundary, not mere omission from one document.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The problem boundary treats the focal element as outside its scope.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must necessarily entail recurrent exclusion rather than a single scoping decision.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The exclusion occurs repeatedly.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must necessarily preserve materiality; exclusion of an immaterial detail does not satisfy this obligation.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The excluded element is material to the problem.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must permit a cause as the excluded material role.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The excluded material element is a cause.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must permit an effect as the excluded material role.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The excluded material element is an effect.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must permit a stakeholder as the excluded material role.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The excluded material element is a stakeholder.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must permit a dependency as the excluded material role.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The excluded material element is a dependency.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}], "predicate": "The current problem boundary repeatedly excludes material causes, effects, stakeholders, or dependencies.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "a problem boundary recurrently excludes a material causal, stakeholder, or dependency role", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P003-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A problem frame always selects inclusions and exclusions but need not omit anything material.", "slug": "problem_framing"}], "residual_id": "r:boundary_reframing:b008_a05_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b008_a05_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The current problem boundary repeatedly treats material causes, effects, stakeholders, or dependencies as out of scope. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The current problem boundary repeatedly treats material causes, effects, stakeholders, or dependencies as out of scope."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A problem frame always selects inclusions and exclusions but need not omit anything material.", "slug": "problem_framing"}], "normalized_requirement": "The current problem boundary repeatedly excludes material causes, effects, stakeholders, or dependencies.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The current problem boundary repeatedly excludes material causes, effects, stakeholders, or dependencies.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires locally rational scoped optimization to omit interstage effects and produce an aggregate outcome worse than joint optimization.", "role_mapping": "Scoped stage objective -> local metric; joint benchmark -> wider outcome; omitted effect -> boundary gap.", "slug": "serial_local_optimization_failure", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b008_a05_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Local metrics improve while the wider system outcome worsens, suggesting the decision boundary is narrower than the impact boundary. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Local metrics improve while the wider system outcome worsens, suggesting the decision boundary is narrower than the impact boundary."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Serial Local Optimization Failure", "one_liner": "Stages arranged in series each optimize a local objective while treating their effects on other stages as outside that objective, so individually rational choices compound into an outcome worse than joint optimization.", "page_ref": "prime:serial_local_optimization_failure", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Scoped stage objective -> local metric; joint benchmark -> wider outcome; omitted effect -> boundary gap.", "slug": "serial_local_optimization_failure", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires locally rational scoped optimization to omit interstage effects and produce an aggregate outcome worse than joint optimization."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Local metrics improve while the wider system outcome worsens because the decision objective omits cross-boundary effects.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Frame construction can include the correct causal engine and does not require a symptom-level remedy.", "slug": "problem_framing"}], "residual_id": "r:boundary_reframing:b008_a05_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b008_a05_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A proposed solution addresses symptoms inside the current boundary while the causal engine sits outside it. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A proposed solution addresses symptoms inside the current boundary while the causal engine sits outside it."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Frame construction can include the correct causal engine and does not require a symptom-level remedy.", "slug": "problem_framing"}], "normalized_requirement": "A proposed solution treats symptoms inside the boundary while the causal engine lies outside it.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A proposed solution treats symptoms inside the boundary while the causal engine lies outside it.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P003-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must necessarily identify the original boundary as the excluding structure.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The excluding structure is the original problem boundary.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must necessarily entail that the actor was outside scope because of the original boundary.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The original boundary excludes the focal actor.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must necessarily entail delayed entry into the process, not only continued exclusion.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The excluded actor appears late in the problem or decision process.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must necessarily preserve the stated causal direction from boundary exclusion to late arrival.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Exclusion by the original boundary causes the actor's late appearance.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must permit an affected party as the excluded actor.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The focal actor is an affected party.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must require a downstream operator as the excluded actor.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The focal actor is a downstream operator.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must require an upstream contributor as the excluded actor.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The focal actor is an upstream contributor.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must permit a maintenance role as the excluded actor.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The focal actor is a maintenance actor.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}], "predicate": "An affected party, downstream operator, upstream contributor, or maintenance actor appears late because the original boundary excluded that actor.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "an actor enters the process late because the original boundary excluded that actor", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P003-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A third-party effect need not cause the affected actor to appear late in a decision process.", "slug": "externality"}], "residual_id": "r:boundary_reframing:b008_a05_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b008_a05_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Affected parties, downstream operators, upstream contributors, or maintenance actors appear late because the original boundary excluded them. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Affected parties, downstream operators, upstream contributors, or maintenance actors appear late because the original boundary excluded them."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A third-party effect need not cause the affected actor to appear late in a decision process.", "slug": "externality"}], "normalized_requirement": "Affected, downstream, upstream, or maintenance actors arrive late because the original boundary excluded them.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Affected, downstream, upstream, or maintenance actors arrive late because the original boundary excluded them.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Multiple defensible frames need not produce active stakeholder disagreement.", "slug": "problem_framing"}], "residual_id": "r:boundary_reframing:b008_a05_c5", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_AMBIGUITY", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b008_a05_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: People disagree not just about the answer, but about what system the problem belongs to. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["People disagree not just about the answer, but about what system the problem belongs to."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Multiple defensible frames need not produce active stakeholder disagreement.", "slug": "problem_framing"}], "normalized_requirement": "Participants disagree about which system the problem belongs to, not merely about its answer.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_AMBIGUITY", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Participants disagree about which system the problem belongs to, not merely about its answer.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires an operator's action to affect third parties through a spillover the operator does not internalize.", "role_mapping": "Operator -> officially accountable actor; third-party effect -> externalized cost, risk, or harm.", "slug": "externality", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b008_a05_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Externalized costs, risks, or harms are visible to some actors but absent from official analysis or accountability. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Externalized costs, risks, or harms are visible to some actors but absent from official analysis or accountability."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Externality", "one_liner": "Spillover effects.", "page_ref": "prime:externality", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Operator -> officially accountable actor; third-party effect -> externalized cost, risk, or harm.", "slug": "externality", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires an operator's action to affect third parties through a spillover the operator does not internalize."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Costs, risks, or harms reach third parties but remain absent from the responsible actor's official analysis or accountability.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 8, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-008", "ledger_sha256": "23c5493b243dda7f5de441095557263d00cfe02f1c6072d8f67453bfa93d4498"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Boundary-Sensitive Segmentation Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:boundary_sensitive_segmentation_design", "slug": "boundary_sensitive_segmentation_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Continuous domains often need discrete action. Organizations cannot create a unique policy, label, workflow, or explanation for every point on a continuum, so they compress variation into segments. That compression is useful, but it is also lossy and consequential.\n\nThe failure usually begins when boundaries are chosen for convenience—round numbers, sample quantiles, default model parameters, familiar labels, available administrative units—or inherited from a context with a different purpose. The resulting segments may be unstable under resampling, too coarse for meaningful differences, too fine for reliable action, or biased against cases concentrated near a cut.\n\nOnce embedded in systems, boundaries become self-reinforcing. Reports are organized around them, people optimize to cross them, interventions change the outcomes used to validate them, and historical records lose comparability when a definition changes. What began as a representation choice becomes institutional fact unless the boundary lifecycle remains visible.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A continuous, spatial, temporal, probabilistic, behavioral, or otherwise densely varying domain must be converted into discrete categories for action or interpretation. Existing cuts may be inherited, arbitrary, overfit, too coarse, too fine, strategically gamed, or treated as natural. Small shifts in a cutpoint can move many cases, change resource allocation, erase transitional structure, or create large discontinuities in treatment. Without a governed boundary lifecycle, the segmentation is difficult to explain, validate, compare across versions, or revise safely."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a continuous domain to be partitioned into discrete categories through threshold placement.", "role_mapping": "Continuous phenomenon -> source continuum; discrete partitions -> operational segments.", "slug": "segmentation_and_boundary_drawing", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b008_a06_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A continuum must be translated into bands, zones, stages, classes, tiers, regions, or cohorts. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A continuum must be translated into bands, zones, stages, classes, tiers, regions, or cohorts."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Segmentation and Boundary Drawing", "one_liner": "Partitioning continuous domain via boundaries concentrates meaning.", "page_ref": "prime:segmentation_and_boundary_drawing", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Continuous phenomenon -> source continuum; discrete partitions -> operational segments.", "slug": "segmentation_and_boundary_drawing", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a continuous domain to be partitioned into discrete categories through threshold placement."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A continuous domain must be divided into operational bands, zones, stages, classes, tiers, regions, or cohorts.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires boundary locations to encode meaning such that small shifts cause large classification changes.", "role_mapping": "Threshold placement -> cutpoint; classification change -> different decision.", "slug": "segmentation_and_boundary_drawing", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime requires bucket boundaries to create apparent features that move when the cuts are redrawn and contaminate downstream inference.", "role_mapping": "Bucket breakpoints -> plausible cutpoints; inference contamination -> decision change.", "slug": "discretization_induced_artifact", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b008_a06_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Different plausible cutpoints or granularities produce materially different decisions. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Different plausible cutpoints or granularities produce materially different decisions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Segmentation and Boundary Drawing", "one_liner": "Partitioning continuous domain via boundaries concentrates meaning.", "page_ref": "prime:segmentation_and_boundary_drawing", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Threshold placement -> cutpoint; classification change -> different decision.", "slug": "segmentation_and_boundary_drawing", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires boundary locations to encode meaning such that small shifts cause large classification changes."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Discretization-Induced Artifact", "one_liner": "Converting a continuous quantity into discrete buckets produces apparent structure that is a property of the bucket boundaries rather than of the underlying phenomenon.", "page_ref": "prime:discretization_induced_artifact", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Bucket breakpoints -> plausible cutpoints; inference contamination -> decision change.", "slug": "discretization_induced_artifact", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires bucket boundaries to create apparent features that move when the cuts are redrawn and contaminate downstream inference."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Different plausible cutpoints or granularities produce materially different downstream classifications or decisions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Constructed category boundaries do not require edge cases to be common, consequential, or contested.", "slug": "segmentation_and_boundary_drawing"}], "residual_id": "r:boundary_sensitive_segmentation_design:b008_a06_c4", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b008_a06_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Edge cases near boundaries are common, consequential, or contested. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Edge cases near boundaries are common, consequential, or contested."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Constructed category boundaries do not require edge cases to be common, consequential, or contested.", "slug": "segmentation_and_boundary_drawing"}], "normalized_requirement": "Cases near segment boundaries are common, consequential, or contested.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Cases near segment boundaries are common, consequential, or contested.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P003-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must necessarily include an analytic method as the producer of the groups.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The focal producer is a method that forms or detects groups.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must necessarily entail actual group output, not merely the possibility or intention to segment.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The method yields groups.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must necessarily entail absence of an accountable operational membership rule; an unexplained but operational rule is not enough.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The output lacks an accountable operational rule that determines group membership.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must permit clustering as the group-producing method.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The group-producing method is a clustering method.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must permit detection as the group-producing method.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The group-producing method is a detection method.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}], "predicate": "A clustering or detection method yields groups without providing an accountable operational rule for membership.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "a group-producing method lacks an accountable operational membership boundary", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P003-C13-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Designed threshold placement already supplies an operational boundary and need not originate in clustering.", "slug": "segmentation_and_boundary_drawing"}], "residual_id": "r:boundary_sensitive_segmentation_design:b008_a06_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b008_a06_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A clustering or detection method yields groups but not an accountable operational boundary. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A clustering or detection method yields groups but not an accountable operational boundary."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Designed threshold placement already supplies an operational boundary and need not originate in clustering.", "slug": "segmentation_and_boundary_drawing"}], "normalized_requirement": "A clustering or detection method yields groups without an accountable operational rule for membership.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A clustering or detection method yields groups without an accountable operational rule for membership.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P003-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"], ["O1", "O3"], ["O1", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must necessarily concern categories already in use rather than only a proposal to create categories.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The causal subject is an existing category system.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must necessarily entail concealment of variation and preserve that the variation is material.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The existing categories hide material variation among cases.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must necessarily entail that the category structure shifts harm outside the evaluated or responsible boundary.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The existing categories externalize harm.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must necessarily entail that the categorical threshold creates an incentive or opportunity for gaming.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The existing categories invite strategic gaming of their threshold.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Existing categories hide material variation, externalize harm, or invite threshold gaming.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "existing categories produce at least one material boundary-related distortion or incentive", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P003-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A bucket-induced apparent feature does not require externalized harm or strategic threshold gaming.", "slug": "discretization_induced_artifact"}], "residual_id": "r:boundary_sensitive_segmentation_design:b008_a06_c7", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b008_a06_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Existing categories hide variation, externalize harm, or encourage threshold gaming. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Existing categories hide variation, externalize harm, or encourage threshold gaming."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Tried to preserve label ambiguity while denying hidden material variation; the exact record's hard-label fiction necessarily blends class-interior and contested-boundary regimes.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Label Ambiguity", "one_liner": "Diagnose a headline accuracy figure as a blend of two measurements — model capability in the class interior where annotators agree, and mere adjudication agreement in the boundary zone where reasonable experts split — by stratifying metrics on the inter-annotator agreement rate.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:label_ambiguity", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "label_ambiguity"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "label_ambiguity", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P003-C14-U1", "why_it_fits": "Label ambiguity necessarily concerns hard categories already used by an evaluation pipeline and their concealment of material variation between class-interior and contested-boundary cases, satisfying the O2 branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Tried to preserve evasion attack while denying threshold-gaming opportunity; discoverable boundary search and payload-preserving manipulation are constitutive of the exact record.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Evasion Attack", "one_liner": "Craft inputs that fall on the benign side of a deployed classifier's learned decision boundary while preserving their malicious payload — exploiting the gap between the boundary and the true concept it was meant to represent, so near-perfect test accuracy coexists with near-zero robustness under attack.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:evasion_attack", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "evasion_attack"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "evasion_attack", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P003-C14-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every evasion-attack instance has an existing classifier category boundary that invites strategic, payload-preserving gaming, satisfying the O4 branch directly."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Existing categories hide material variation, externalize harm, or invite threshold gaming.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Downstream routing or interpretation requires finite categories rather than raw continuous values.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A continuous, spatial, temporal, probabilistic, behavioral, or otherwise densely varying domain must be converted into discrete categories for action or interpretation. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: Downstream routing or interpretation requires finite categories rather than raw continuous values. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Downstream routing or interpretation requires finite categories rather than raw continuous values.", "A continuous, spatial, temporal, probabilistic, behavioral, or otherwise densely varying domain must be converted into discrete categories for action or interpretation."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "Downstream routing or interpretation requires finite categories rather than raw continuous values."}, {"display_text": "Segments need stable meanings across teams, time, scale, or data sources.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this deployment constraint: Segments need stable meanings across teams, time, scale, or data sources. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Segments need stable meanings across teams, time, scale, or data sources."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Segments need stable meanings across teams, time, scale, or data sources."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 8, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-008", "ledger_sha256": "23c5493b243dda7f5de441095557263d00cfe02f1c6072d8f67453bfa93d4498"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Bounded Approximation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:bounded_approximation", "slug": "bounded_approximation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 5, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a mismatch between the cost of exactness and the decision’s actual need for precision. A system may delay action while pursuing detail that would not change the decision. Or it may move quickly by relying on estimates that no one has bounded, validated, or communicated honestly.\n\nBoth failure patterns are common. Analysis paralysis wastes time and opportunity. Unbounded guesswork creates hidden risk. Bounded Approximation works by making precision proportional: enough fidelity for the decision, enough uncertainty expression to avoid overtrust, and enough escalation discipline to prevent approximate reasoning from becoming permanent dogma.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system needs to reason, choose, forecast, design, or allocate under constraints, but exact representation or computation is infeasible relative to the decision need. Without a disciplined approximation, the system either stalls in pursuit of exactness or acts on unbounded guesswork."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A tractable surrogate may be chosen for memory, communication, or convenience even when exact work fits the time window.", "slug": "approximation"}], "residual_id": "r:bounded_approximation:b008_a07_c1", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b008_a07_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Exact calculation, measurement, or modeling would take too long for the decision window. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Exact calculation, measurement, or modeling would take too long for the decision window."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A tractable surrogate may be chosen for memory, communication, or convenience even when exact work fits the time window.", "slug": "approximation"}], "normalized_requirement": "Exact calculation, measurement, or modeling would exceed the decision window.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Exact calculation, measurement, or modeling would exceed the decision window.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A bounded-error surrogate need not be selected by an explicit value-of-precision comparison.", "slug": "approximation"}], "residual_id": "r:bounded_approximation:b008_a07_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b008_a07_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The cost of exactness exceeds the value of the extra precision. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The cost of exactness exceeds the value of the extra precision."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A bounded-error surrogate need not be selected by an explicit value-of-precision comparison.", "slug": "approximation"}], "normalized_requirement": "The cost of exactness exceeds the decision value of its additional precision.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The cost of exactness exceeds the decision value of its additional precision.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A bounded decision agent may lack information or time even when the exact model itself is simple.", "slug": "bounded_rationality"}], "residual_id": "r:bounded_approximation:b008_a07_c4", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b008_a07_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The exact model is too computationally expensive or structurally complex for routine use. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The exact model is too computationally expensive or structurally complex for routine use."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A bounded decision agent may lack information or time even when the exact model itself is simple.", "slug": "bounded_rationality"}], "normalized_requirement": "The exact model is computationally expensive or structurally complex for routine use.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The exact model is computationally expensive or structurally complex for routine use.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A single approximation can have a bounded error; the prime does not require multiple disagreeing sources.", "slug": "approximation"}], "residual_id": "r:bounded_approximation:b008_a07_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b008_a07_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Multiple approximate sources disagree but still bracket a decision-relevant range. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Multiple approximate sources disagree but still bracket a decision-relevant range."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A single approximation can have a bounded error; the prime does not require multiple disagreeing sources.", "slug": "approximation"}], "normalized_requirement": "Multiple approximate sources disagree but jointly bracket a decision-relevant range.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Multiple approximate sources disagree but jointly bracket a decision-relevant range.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "A purpose-specific error tolerance is known and the cheaper approximation can be shown to remain inside it.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A purpose-specific error tolerance is known and the cheaper approximation can be shown to remain inside it.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The system only needs scale, direction, feasibility, ranking, or a safe-enough operating range.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially appropriate when the immediate need is feasibility, scale, ranking, screening, prioritization, or early learning rather than final proof. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: The system only needs scale, direction, feasibility, ranking, or a safe-enough operating range. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The system only needs scale, direction, feasibility, ranking, or a safe-enough operating range.", "It is especially appropriate when the immediate need is feasibility, scale, ranking, screening, prioritization, or early learning rather than final proof."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "The system only needs scale, direction, feasibility, ranking, or a safe-enough operating range."}, {"display_text": "Early action, learning, or screening matters more than comprehensive certainty.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially appropriate when the immediate need is feasibility, scale, ranking, screening, prioritization, or early learning rather than final proof. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: Early action, learning, or screening matters more than comprehensive certainty. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Early action, learning, or screening matters more than comprehensive certainty.", "It is especially appropriate when the immediate need is feasibility, scale, ranking, screening, prioritization, or early learning rather than final proof."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Early action, learning, or screening matters more than comprehensive certainty."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 8, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-008", "ledger_sha256": "23c5493b243dda7f5de441095557263d00cfe02f1c6072d8f67453bfa93d4498"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Bounded Backlog", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:bounded_backlog", "slug": "bounded_backlog"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 5 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "An unbounded backlog can disguise failure as acceptance. Every new item appears to have entered the system, but the system may have no realistic path to serve it. This creates a dangerous mismatch between visible intake and actual service capacity.\n\nThe structural problem is a growing waiting stock with no enforced upper bound. The queue, waitlist, ticket system, inbox, or application pipeline becomes an obligation store. Because the backlog exists, stakeholders may assume that the system is functioning; because it is unbounded, overload remains hidden until delays, abandoned items, stale assumptions, duplicate requests, or collapse appear.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A queue or backlog can grow without limit, hiding overload and creating work that cannot realistically be seen, managed, completed, or honestly promised."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P003-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must necessarily include a system that both accepts work and has a service-capacity role.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The accepting entity is a system with an intake path and finite service capacity.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must necessarily type incoming objects as new work that waits for service, not work already being served.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The accepted objects are new units of waiting work.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must necessarily entail continued-acceptance capability for new waiting work, without requiring that acceptance is currently occurring.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The system can continue accepting new waiting work.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must necessarily entail a fully occupied or saturated service-capacity state.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The system's service capacity is saturated.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must necessarily preserve concurrency and ordering: saturation is already present while continued acceptance remains possible.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The capability to accept new waiting work remains available while service capacity is already saturated.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "The system can keep accepting new waiting work even when service capacity is already saturated.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "the system retains continued-acceptance capability while service capacity is saturated", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P003-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A bounded carrier is constrained within a limit and does not require continued intake beyond service saturation.", "slug": "boundedness"}], "residual_id": "r:bounded_backlog:b008_a08_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b008_a08_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The system can keep accepting waiting work even when service capacity is already saturated. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The system can keep accepting waiting work even when service capacity is already saturated."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A bounded carrier is constrained within a limit and does not require continued intake beyond service saturation.", "slug": "boundedness"}], "normalized_requirement": "The system accepts new waiting work even while service capacity is saturated.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The system accepts new waiting work even while service capacity is saturated.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P004-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require an accumulating waiting-work stock, not merely an arbitrary signal or inventory.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The masking structure includes a backlog or queue stock whose size is growing.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must make system overload the hidden condition rather than an unrelated fact.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The condition being masked is overload of the service or work system represented by the backlog.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include an actor or system whose access to the overload condition is reduced.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The destination of the masking relation is a relevant observer such as an operator, user, manager, or upstream system.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail backlog growth as a cause of reduced overload visibility, not mere co-occurrence.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Growth of the backlog causes the overload to become less visible to the observer.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require negative visibility effects; neutral representation or increased visibility is insufficient.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The backlog growth conceals rather than reveals the overload.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Backlog growth hides overload from operators, users, managers, or upstream systems.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Growth of a backlog reduces relevant observers' visibility of the underlying overload.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P004-C01-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A buffer can make variability visible and need not conceal sustained overload.", "slug": "buffering"}], "residual_id": "r:bounded_backlog:b008_a08_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b008_a08_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Backlog growth hides overload from operators, users, managers, or upstream systems. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Backlog growth hides overload from operators, users, managers, or upstream systems."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A buffer can make variability visible and need not conceal sustained overload.", "slug": "buffering"}], "normalized_requirement": "Backlog growth masks overload from operators, users, managers, or upstream systems.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Backlog growth masks overload from operators, users, managers, or upstream systems.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P004-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require a waiting service item with backlog membership, not any listed object.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The represented object is an item admitted to or present in a service backlog.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include an actor for whom queue membership carries the asserted meaning.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A relevant stakeholder occupies the interpreter role for the backlog signal.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail the directional interpretation from membership to promised eventual service.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The stakeholder interprets backlog membership as a commitment that the item will eventually receive service.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require low service likelihood; bare possibility or guaranteed service does not satisfy it.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Actual eventual service for the item is unlikely.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the mismatch between the strong commitment meaning and weak fulfillment prospect.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The commitment interpretation persists despite the low likelihood of eventual service.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Relevant stakeholders interpret an item's backlog membership as a service commitment even when eventual service is unlikely.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Backlog membership is taken to promise eventual service despite a low likelihood that the service will occur.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P004-C02-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A representation of future possibility does not require a saturated service queue or false commitment.", "slug": "future_or_promise"}], "residual_id": "r:bounded_backlog:b008_a08_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b008_a08_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The presence of an item in the backlog is interpreted as a service commitment even when eventual service is unlikely. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The presence of an item in the backlog is interpreted as a service commitment even when eventual service is unlikely."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A routinely fulfilled backorder falsifies O4, so DIRECT fails; the guard excludes exactly that case. With the guard true, the binding queued claim still supplies the stakeholder commitment, leaving no surviving counterexample.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Backorder", "one_liner": "The fulfilment arrangement in which an order is accepted as a binding obligation despite a stock-out, becoming a queued claim against future supply tracked in a visible ledger and clocked against an estimated resupply, rather than being refused as a lost sale.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:backorder", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O4", "O5"], "guard_type": "THRESHOLD_CROSSING", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "backorder_fulfillment_unlikely", "predicate": "The backordered item's probability of eventual fulfillment is below the low-likelihood threshold.", "rationale": "Role mapping, direction, polarity, modality, quantifier, and one complete DNF branch pass. The one guard is anchored and does not restate the head."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "backorder"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The backordered item's probability of eventual fulfillment is below the low-likelihood threshold."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "backorder", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P004-C02-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact backorder supplies an accepted service item, buyer/seller stakeholders, a visible backlog ledger, and a binding queued claim against future service. One atomic low-fulfillment-probability guard supplies O4 and makes O5 necessary without adding a role or relation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Backlog membership is interpreted as a service commitment even when eventual service is implausible.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P004-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must apply to a queued or backlogged item rather than an arbitrary aging object.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The affected entity is an item waiting in a backlog.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require an aged waiting item, not a newly admitted backlog item.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The backlog item is old or has remained waiting long enough to be aged.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail loss of current relevance or validity for the aged waiting item.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A complete branch is that the aged backlog item becomes stale.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail creation or presence of duplicate work corresponding to the aged item.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A complete branch is that the aged backlog item becomes duplicated.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail loss of responsible awareness of the particular waiting item.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "A complete branch is that responsible actors forget the aged backlog item.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail political resistance or cost specifically attached to rejecting the aged item.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "A complete branch is that rejecting the aged backlog item becomes politically difficult for responsible decision-makers.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve increased difficulty or cost without requiring absolute inability to reject.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "In the political-entrenchment branch, rejection is difficult rather than impossible.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "Old backlog items become stale, duplicated, forgotten, or politically difficult to reject.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Aged backlog items acquire at least one specified degradation or entrenchment state.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P004-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Replica convergence does not require queued service items to age or become politically sticky.", "slug": "eventual_consistency"}], "residual_id": "r:bounded_backlog:b008_a08_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b008_a08_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Old backlog items become stale, duplicated, forgotten, or politically difficult to reject. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Old backlog items become stale, duplicated, forgotten, or politically difficult to reject."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Replica convergence does not require queued service items to age or become politically sticky.", "slug": "eventual_consistency"}], "normalized_requirement": "Old waiting items become stale, duplicated, forgotten, or politically difficult to reject.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Old waiting items become stale, duplicated, forgotten, or politically difficult to reject.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A separable removal rate can remain above every admissible input rate and therefore does not require backlog growth.", "slug": "clearance_rate"}], "residual_id": "r:bounded_backlog:b008_a08_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b008_a08_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A surge, intake channel, waitlist, or ticket queue can grow faster than the system can drain it. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A surge, intake channel, waitlist, or ticket queue can grow faster than the system can drain it."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A separable removal rate can remain above every admissible input rate and therefore does not require backlog growth.", "slug": "clearance_rate"}], "normalized_requirement": "Queue inflow can exceed the system's clearance rate so stored work grows.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Queue inflow can exceed the system's clearance rate so stored work grows.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Operators need a legitimate basis for closing intake, rejecting overflow, or asking for capacity relief.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This creates a dangerous mismatch between visible intake and actual service capacity. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: Operators need a legitimate basis for closing intake, rejecting overflow, or asking for capacity relief. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Operators need a legitimate basis for closing intake, rejecting overflow, or asking for capacity relief.", "This creates a dangerous mismatch between visible intake and actual service capacity."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Operators need a legitimate basis for closing intake, rejecting overflow, or asking for capacity relief."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 8, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-008", "ledger_sha256": "23c5493b243dda7f5de441095557263d00cfe02f1c6072d8f67453bfa93d4498"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Bounded Discretion Governance", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:bounded_discretion_governance", "slug": "bounded_discretion_governance"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A rule-governed system faces cases whose relevant facts cannot be fully enumerated in advance. If every case is forced through a rigid rule, the system becomes brittle, unfair, slow, or unsafe. If agents improvise without boundaries, decisions become inconsistent, biased, unreviewable, or illegitimate. The missing structure is a governed judgment space: enough latitude to fit local context, enough constraint to remain accountable.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A rule-governed system faces cases whose relevant facts cannot be fully enumerated in advance. If every case is forced through a rigid rule, the system becomes brittle, unfair, slow, or unsafe. If agents improvise without boundaries, decisions become inconsistent, biased, unreviewable, or illegitimate. The missing structure is a governed judgment space: enough latitude to fit local context, enough constraint to remain accountable."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a bounding rule to leave a deliberate open region for situated case-responsive judgment.", "role_mapping": "Bounding rule -> general rule; open region -> heterogeneous-case misfit; situated agent -> decision-maker.", "slug": "discretion", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b008_a09_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: General rules meet heterogeneous cases where strict application regularly misfits important facts. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["General rules meet heterogeneous cases where strict application regularly misfits important facts."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Discretion", "one_liner": "Latitude granted to an agent to decide within bounded limits.", "page_ref": "prime:discretion", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Bounding rule -> general rule; open region -> heterogeneous-case misfit; situated agent -> decision-maker.", "slug": "discretion", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a bounding rule to leave a deliberate open region for situated case-responsive judgment."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "General rules meet heterogeneous cases that require situated judgment inside a deliberately reserved gap.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires delegated latitude to choose among actions permitted by a surrounding rule.", "role_mapping": "Permissible action set -> reserved choice region; agent -> local decision-maker.", "slug": "discretion", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b008_a09_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Agents need to choose among permissible actions or interpretations rather than merely execute a command. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Agents need to choose among permissible actions or interpretations rather than merely execute a command."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Discretion", "one_liner": "Latitude granted to an agent to decide within bounded limits.", "page_ref": "prime:discretion", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Permissible action set -> reserved choice region; agent -> local decision-maker.", "slug": "discretion", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires delegated latitude to choose among actions permitted by a surrounding rule."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Agents choose among permissible actions or interpretations instead of merely executing a command.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime explicitly trades rule predictability for case responsiveness by reserving bounded judgment.", "role_mapping": "Rule predictability -> consistency; case responsiveness -> equity, speed, expertise, or adaptation.", "slug": "discretion", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b008_a09_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The system values consistency and equal treatment but also needs equity, expertise, speed, or local adaptation. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The system values consistency and equal treatment but also needs equity, expertise, speed, or local adaptation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Discretion", "one_liner": "Latitude granted to an agent to decide within bounded limits.", "page_ref": "prime:discretion", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Rule predictability -> consistency; case responsiveness -> equity, speed, expertise, or adaptation.", "slug": "discretion", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime explicitly trades rule predictability for case responsiveness by reserving bounded judgment."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The system must trade rule consistency and equal treatment against equity, expertise, speed, or local adaptation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Bounded judgment can be accepted and need not produce blame for either extreme.", "slug": "discretion"}], "residual_id": "r:bounded_discretion_governance:b008_a09_c4", "residual_kind": "CONTINGENT_FACT", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b008_a09_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Decision-makers are blamed for either robotic rule-following or arbitrary improvisation. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Decision-makers are blamed for either robotic rule-following or arbitrary improvisation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Bounded judgment can be accepted and need not produce blame for either extreme.", "slug": "discretion"}], "normalized_requirement": "Decision-makers are blamed for rigid rule-following and for arbitrary improvisation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "CONTINGENT_FACT", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Decision-makers are blamed for rigid rule-following and for arbitrary improvisation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P004-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern acts of discretion or exception, not ordinary compliant rule execution.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The governed object is a discretionary departure from a rule or a professional judgment under incomplete rules.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require actual practice; mere authorization or possibility of discretion is insufficient.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "At least one such discretionary practice actually occurs in the system.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail informality in how the discretionary act is exercised.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The discretionary practice occurs informally rather than through a stable formal procedure.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern a repeatable governance structure, not a one-off approval or isolated record.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The missing control role is a governance frame reusable across discretionary cases.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require absence of the reusable frame rather than weak use of an existing frame.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "No reusable governance frame governs the informal practice.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Exceptions, waivers, overrides, or professional judgments occur informally without a reusable governance frame.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Discretionary departures or judgments are practiced informally and lack a reusable governance frame.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P004-C04-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime includes a bounding rule and reviewability rather than unframed informal exception practice.", "slug": "discretion"}], "residual_id": "r:bounded_discretion_governance:b008_a09_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b008_a09_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Exceptions, waivers, overrides, or professional judgments are occurring informally without a reusable governance frame. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Exceptions, waivers, overrides, or professional judgments are occurring informally without a reusable governance frame."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime includes a bounding rule and reviewability rather than unframed informal exception practice.", "slug": "discretion"}], "normalized_requirement": "Exceptions, waivers, overrides, or professional judgments occur informally without a reusable governance frame.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Exceptions, waivers, overrides, or professional judgments occur informally without a reusable governance frame.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P004-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must type the compared actors as discretionary decision-makers, not arbitrary participants.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The principal actors are agents who exercise discretion.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require multiple agents; a single discretionary actor cannot satisfy the condition.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "At least two agents exercise the discretionary space.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must place the agents in a shared decision domain rather than unrelated discretionary domains.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The multiple agents exercise the same discretionary decision space.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must contain a cross-agent alignment or consistency relation, not only local competence.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Calibration is required across the agents or their units.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail insufficient calibration relative to the shared-space need, not merely imperfect similarity.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Existing cross-person calibration is below the sufficiency needed for the shared space.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the calibration deficit rather than entail adequate cross-agent alignment.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The required calibration relation is absent or inadequate.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Multiple agents exercise the same discretionary space without sufficient cross-person calibration.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Agents sharing one discretionary decision space are insufficiently calibrated with one another.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P004-C05-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Discretion may be held by one agent and does not require calibration failure across multiple agents.", "slug": "discretion"}], "residual_id": "r:bounded_discretion_governance:b008_a09_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b008_a09_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The same discretionary space is exercised by multiple agents and therefore requires calibration across people or units. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The same discretionary space is exercised by multiple agents and therefore requires calibration across people or units."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Discretion may be held by one agent and does not require calibration failure across multiple agents.", "slug": "discretion"}], "normalized_requirement": "Multiple agents exercise the same discretionary space without sufficient cross-person calibration.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Multiple agents exercise the same discretionary space without sufficient cross-person calibration.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Review, appeal, audit, or public reason-giving is possible after the fact.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Review, appeal, audit, or public reason-giving is possible after the fact. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Review, appeal, audit, or public reason-giving is possible after the fact."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "Review, appeal, audit, or public reason-giving is possible after the fact."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 8, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-008", "ledger_sha256": "23c5493b243dda7f5de441095557263d00cfe02f1c6072d8f67453bfa93d4498"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Bounded Random-Walk Navigation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:bounded_random_walk_navigation", "slug": "bounded_random_walk_navigation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A process evolves through many locally small random or quasi-random increments, but governance treats each step in isolation or interprets the cumulative path as intentional direction. Over time, the walk diffuses, crosses boundaries, creates apparent trends, consumes exploration budget, or gets absorbed in undesirable states. Without path-level rules, randomness is either over-suppressed, allowed to wander without limit, or mistaken for signal.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A process evolves through many locally small random or quasi-random increments, but governance treats each step in isolation or interprets the cumulative path as intentional direction. Over time, the walk diffuses, crosses boundaries, creates apparent trends, consumes exploration budget, or gets absorbed in undesirable states. Without path-level rules, randomness is either over-suppressed, allowed to wander without limit, or mistaken for signal."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a persistent state updated by successive random increments into one cumulative trajectory.", "role_mapping": "Random increments -> trials or moves; accumulating state -> exploration position.", "slug": "random_walk", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b008_a10_c1a", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Exploration proceeds by small random trials, mutations, experiments, local searches, or opportunistic moves. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Exploration proceeds by small random trials, mutations, experiments, local searches, or opportunistic moves."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Random Walk", "one_liner": "A trajectory built as the running sum of independent random increments, whose displacement grows like the square root of the number of steps.", "page_ref": "prime:random_walk", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Random increments -> trials or moves; accumulating state -> exploration position.", "slug": "random_walk", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a persistent state updated by successive random increments into one cumulative trajectory."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A trajectory is built as an accumulating sequence of small random increments.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires independent increments whose cancellations yield directionless diffusion with displacement growing as the square root of steps.", "role_mapping": "Running sum -> cumulative displacement; no-memory increments -> absent global direction.", "slug": "random_walk", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b008_a10_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A trajectory has no reliable global direction, yet cumulative displacement from the start matters. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A trajectory has no reliable global direction, yet cumulative displacement from the start matters."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Random Walk", "one_liner": "A trajectory built as the running sum of independent random increments, whose displacement grows like the square root of the number of steps.", "page_ref": "prime:random_walk", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Running sum -> cumulative displacement; no-memory increments -> absent global direction.", "slug": "random_walk", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires independent increments whose cancellations yield directionless diffusion with displacement growing as the square root of steps."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The trajectory lacks reliable global direction while cumulative displacement from the start grows.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A random walk is value-neutral and need not cross any consequential limit.", "slug": "random_walk"}], "residual_id": "r:bounded_random_walk_navigation:b008_a10_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b008_a10_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Step-by-step decisions seem harmless, but many steps can cross a risk, budget, exposure, fairness, or attention boundary. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Step-by-step decisions seem harmless, but many steps can cross a risk, budget, exposure, fairness, or attention boundary."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A random walk is value-neutral and need not cross any consequential limit.", "slug": "random_walk"}], "normalized_requirement": "Many individually harmless steps can cumulatively cross a risk, budget, exposure, fairness, or attention boundary.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Many individually harmless steps can cumulatively cross a risk, budget, exposure, fairness, or attention boundary.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The stochastic path does not require an observer or narrative misattribution.", "slug": "random_walk"}], "residual_id": "r:bounded_random_walk_navigation:b008_a10_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b008_a10_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: People infer a trend, skill, or causal story from a path that may be stochastic wandering. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["People infer a trend, skill, or causal story from a path that may be stochastic wandering."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The stochastic path does not require an observer or narrative misattribution.", "slug": "random_walk"}], "normalized_requirement": "Observers infer trend, skill, or a causal story from a path that may be stochastic wandering.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Observers infer trend, skill, or a causal story from a path that may be stochastic wandering.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A specified condition that ends a process is the missing remedy, not the antecedent absence of one.", "slug": "termination_condition"}], "residual_id": "r:bounded_random_walk_navigation:b008_a10_c6", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_AMBIGUITY", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b008_a10_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Reset, restart, reflection, or stopping conditions are unclear. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Reset, restart, reflection, or stopping conditions are unclear."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A specified condition that ends a process is the missing remedy, not the antecedent absence of one.", "slug": "termination_condition"}], "normalized_requirement": "Reset, restart, reflection, or stopping conditions are unclear.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_AMBIGUITY", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Reset, restart, reflection, or stopping conditions are unclear.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Independent increments are mandatory for the prime, so it cannot entail their possible violation.", "slug": "random_walk"}], "residual_id": "r:bounded_random_walk_navigation:b008_a10_c7", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b008_a10_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Independent-step assumptions may be violated by correlation, momentum, feedback, or path dependence. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Independent-step assumptions may be violated by correlation, momentum, feedback, or path dependence."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Independent increments are mandatory for the prime, so it cannot entail their possible violation.", "slug": "random_walk"}], "normalized_requirement": "Correlation, momentum, feedback, or path dependence may violate independent-step assumptions.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Correlation, momentum, feedback, or path dependence may violate independent-step assumptions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A system must sample or search broadly without getting trapped, drifting too far, or hitting an absorbing failure state.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Over time, the walk diffuses, crosses boundaries, creates apparent trends, consumes exploration budget, or gets absorbed in undesirable states. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: A system must sample or search broadly without getting trapped, drifting too far, or hitting an absorbing failure state. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A system must sample or search broadly without getting trapped, drifting too far, or hitting an absorbing failure state.", "Over time, the walk diffuses, crosses boundaries, creates apparent trends, consumes exploration budget, or gets absorbed in undesirable states."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "A system must sample or search broadly without getting trapped, drifting too far, or hitting an absorbing failure state."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 8, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-008", "ledger_sha256": "23c5493b243dda7f5de441095557263d00cfe02f1c6072d8f67453bfa93d4498"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Bounded-Rationality Decision Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:bounded_rationality_design", "slug": "bounded_rationality_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 3, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 7 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 3 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 7}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Decision systems demand exhaustive optimization, perfect information, or unlimited attention from people and organizations that possess none of them, or they use shortcuts without declaring when those shortcuts fail.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Decision systems demand exhaustive optimization, perfect information, or unlimited attention from people and organizations that possess none of them, or they use shortcuts without declaring when those shortcuts fail."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires real information limits to be constitutive of the decision situation.", "role_mapping": "Information limit -> incomplete, delayed, costly, or noisy evidence.", "slug": "bounded_rationality", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b008_a11_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Information is incomplete, delayed, costly, or noisy. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Information is incomplete, delayed, costly, or noisy."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Bounded Rationality", "one_liner": "Limited decision capacity.", "page_ref": "prime:bounded_rationality", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Information limit -> incomplete, delayed, costly, or noisy evidence.", "slug": "bounded_rationality", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires real information limits to be constitutive of the decision situation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Decision-relevant information is incomplete, delayed, costly, or noisy.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires accumulated decision volume to deplete cognitive resources and degrade output quality over the sequence.", "role_mapping": "Decision-volume accumulator -> high volume; quality trajectory -> fatigue or inconsistency.", "slug": "decision_fatigue", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b008_a11_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Decision volume produces fatigue or inconsistent quality. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Decision volume produces fatigue or inconsistent quality."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Decision Fatigue", "one_liner": "Reduced decision quality over time.", "page_ref": "prime:decision_fatigue", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Decision-volume accumulator -> high volume; quality trajectory -> fatigue or inconsistency.", "slug": "decision_fatigue", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires accumulated decision volume to deplete cognitive resources and degrade output quality over the sequence."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "High decision volume produces fatigue or inconsistent decision quality.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Exhaustive optimization can be infeasible without an explicit expected-value comparison at the margin.", "slug": "bounded_rationality"}], "residual_id": "r:bounded_rationality_design:b008_a11_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b008_a11_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Optimization cost can exceed the value of marginal improvement. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Optimization cost can exceed the value of marginal improvement."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Exhaustive optimization can be infeasible without an explicit expected-value comparison at the margin.", "slug": "bounded_rationality"}], "normalized_requirement": "Optimization cost exceeds the expected value of marginal improvement.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Optimization cost exceeds the expected value of marginal improvement.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Resource limits do not require materially heterogeneous stakes or tiered methods.", "slug": "bounded_rationality"}], "residual_id": "r:bounded_rationality_design:b008_a11_c6", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b008_a11_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Stakes differ enough that one method should not govern every case. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Stakes differ enough that one method should not govern every case."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Resource limits do not require materially heterogeneous stakes or tiered methods.", "slug": "bounded_rationality"}], "normalized_requirement": "Decision stakes vary enough that a single method should not govern every case.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Decision stakes vary enough that a single method should not govern every case.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P004-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern a shortcut used in decision or execution, not a complete optimization procedure.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The principal procedure is an operational decision shortcut such as a default or heuristic.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail operational use; possibility, recommendation, or availability alone is insufficient.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The shortcut is actually used rather than merely available or proposed.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern conditions delimiting when the shortcut is reliable, not arbitrary missing metadata.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The missing object is the shortcut's validity or applicability boundary.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must connect the boundary information specifically to documentation governing shortcut use.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Documentation should state the validity boundary for the used shortcut.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require missing documentation, not merely a narrow or imperfectly chosen boundary.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The validity boundary is not documented.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Defaults or heuristics are used, but their validity boundaries are undocumented.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Operational decision shortcuts are used without documentation of the conditions under which they remain valid.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P004-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A bounded-rational procedure can have explicit stopping and applicability rules.", "slug": "bounded_rationality"}], "residual_id": "r:bounded_rationality_design:b008_a11_c7", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b008_a11_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Defaults or heuristics are used but their validity boundaries are undocumented. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Defaults or heuristics are used but their validity boundaries are undocumented."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A bounded-rational procedure can have explicit stopping and applicability rules.", "slug": "bounded_rationality"}], "normalized_requirement": "Defaults or heuristics are used without documented validity boundaries.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Defaults or heuristics are used without documented validity boundaries.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires time or attention limits that make full enumeration or evaluation infeasible or prohibitively costly.", "role_mapping": "Decision-resource limit -> time or attention; choice set -> alternatives.", "slug": "bounded_rationality", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b008_a11_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Decision systems demand exhaustive optimization, perfect information, or unlimited attention from people and organizations that possess none of them, or they use shortcuts without declaring when those shortcuts fail. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Time or attention is insufficient for exhaustive comparison.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Time or attention is insufficient for exhaustive comparison.", "Decision systems demand exhaustive optimization, perfect information, or unlimited attention from people and organizations that possess none of them, or they use shortcuts without declaring when those shortcuts fail."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Bounded Rationality", "one_liner": "Limited decision capacity.", "page_ref": "prime:bounded_rationality", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Decision-resource limit -> time or attention; choice set -> alternatives.", "slug": "bounded_rationality", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires time or attention limits that make full enumeration or evaluation infeasible or prohibitively costly."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Time or attention is insufficient for exhaustive comparison.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires accumulated decision volume to deplete cognitive resources and degrade output quality over the sequence.", "role_mapping": "Decision-volume accumulator -> high volume; quality trajectory -> fatigue or inconsistency.", "slug": "decision_fatigue", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b008_a11_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Decision volume produces fatigue or inconsistent quality. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Decision volume produces fatigue or inconsistent quality."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Decision Fatigue", "one_liner": "Reduced decision quality over time.", "page_ref": "prime:decision_fatigue", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Decision-volume accumulator -> high volume; quality trajectory -> fatigue or inconsistency.", "slug": "decision_fatigue", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires accumulated decision volume to deplete cognitive resources and degrade output quality over the sequence."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "High decision volume produces fatigue or inconsistent decision quality.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Exhaustive optimization can be infeasible without an explicit expected-value comparison at the margin.", "slug": "bounded_rationality"}], "residual_id": "r:bounded_rationality_design:b008_a11_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b008_a11_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Optimization cost can exceed the value of marginal improvement. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Optimization cost can exceed the value of marginal improvement."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Exhaustive optimization can be infeasible without an explicit expected-value comparison at the margin.", "slug": "bounded_rationality"}], "normalized_requirement": "Optimization cost exceeds the expected value of marginal improvement.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Optimization cost exceeds the expected value of marginal improvement.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Resource limits do not require materially heterogeneous stakes or tiered methods.", "slug": "bounded_rationality"}], "residual_id": "r:bounded_rationality_design:b008_a11_c6", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b008_a11_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Stakes differ enough that one method should not govern every case. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Stakes differ enough that one method should not govern every case."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Resource limits do not require materially heterogeneous stakes or tiered methods.", "slug": "bounded_rationality"}], "normalized_requirement": "Decision stakes vary enough that a single method should not govern every case.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Decision stakes vary enough that a single method should not govern every case.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P004-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern a shortcut used in decision or execution, not a complete optimization procedure.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The principal procedure is an operational decision shortcut such as a default or heuristic.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail operational use; possibility, recommendation, or availability alone is insufficient.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The shortcut is actually used rather than merely available or proposed.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern conditions delimiting when the shortcut is reliable, not arbitrary missing metadata.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The missing object is the shortcut's validity or applicability boundary.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must connect the boundary information specifically to documentation governing shortcut use.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Documentation should state the validity boundary for the used shortcut.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require missing documentation, not merely a narrow or imperfectly chosen boundary.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The validity boundary is not documented.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Defaults or heuristics are used, but their validity boundaries are undocumented.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Operational decision shortcuts are used without documentation of the conditions under which they remain valid.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P004-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A bounded-rational procedure can have explicit stopping and applicability rules.", "slug": "bounded_rationality"}], "residual_id": "r:bounded_rationality_design:b008_a11_c7", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b008_a11_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Defaults or heuristics are used but their validity boundaries are undocumented. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Defaults or heuristics are used but their validity boundaries are undocumented."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A bounded-rational procedure can have explicit stopping and applicability rules.", "slug": "bounded_rationality"}], "normalized_requirement": "Defaults or heuristics are used without documented validity boundaries.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Defaults or heuristics are used without documented validity boundaries.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires real computational or cognitive limits relative to a nontrivial choice set.", "role_mapping": "Decision capacity -> computation or expertise; environment complexity -> coordination burden.", "slug": "bounded_rationality", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b008_a11_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Computation, expertise, or coordination is scarce. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Computation, expertise, or coordination is scarce."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Bounded Rationality", "one_liner": "Limited decision capacity.", "page_ref": "prime:bounded_rationality", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Decision capacity -> computation or expertise; environment complexity -> coordination burden.", "slug": "bounded_rationality", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires real computational or cognitive limits relative to a nontrivial choice set."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Computation, expertise, or coordination capacity is scarce relative to the choice problem.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires accumulated decision volume to deplete cognitive resources and degrade output quality over the sequence.", "role_mapping": "Decision-volume accumulator -> high volume; quality trajectory -> fatigue or inconsistency.", "slug": "decision_fatigue", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b008_a11_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Decision volume produces fatigue or inconsistent quality. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Decision volume produces fatigue or inconsistent quality."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Decision Fatigue", "one_liner": "Reduced decision quality over time.", "page_ref": "prime:decision_fatigue", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Decision-volume accumulator -> high volume; quality trajectory -> fatigue or inconsistency.", "slug": "decision_fatigue", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires accumulated decision volume to deplete cognitive resources and degrade output quality over the sequence."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "High decision volume produces fatigue or inconsistent decision quality.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Exhaustive optimization can be infeasible without an explicit expected-value comparison at the margin.", "slug": "bounded_rationality"}], "residual_id": "r:bounded_rationality_design:b008_a11_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b008_a11_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Optimization cost can exceed the value of marginal improvement. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Optimization cost can exceed the value of marginal improvement."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Exhaustive optimization can be infeasible without an explicit expected-value comparison at the margin.", "slug": "bounded_rationality"}], "normalized_requirement": "Optimization cost exceeds the expected value of marginal improvement.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Optimization cost exceeds the expected value of marginal improvement.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Resource limits do not require materially heterogeneous stakes or tiered methods.", "slug": "bounded_rationality"}], "residual_id": "r:bounded_rationality_design:b008_a11_c6", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b008_a11_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Stakes differ enough that one method should not govern every case. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Stakes differ enough that one method should not govern every case."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Resource limits do not require materially heterogeneous stakes or tiered methods.", "slug": "bounded_rationality"}], "normalized_requirement": "Decision stakes vary enough that a single method should not govern every case.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Decision stakes vary enough that a single method should not govern every case.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P004-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern a shortcut used in decision or execution, not a complete optimization procedure.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The principal procedure is an operational decision shortcut such as a default or heuristic.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail operational use; possibility, recommendation, or availability alone is insufficient.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The shortcut is actually used rather than merely available or proposed.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern conditions delimiting when the shortcut is reliable, not arbitrary missing metadata.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The missing object is the shortcut's validity or applicability boundary.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must connect the boundary information specifically to documentation governing shortcut use.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Documentation should state the validity boundary for the used shortcut.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require missing documentation, not merely a narrow or imperfectly chosen boundary.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The validity boundary is not documented.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Defaults or heuristics are used, but their validity boundaries are undocumented.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Operational decision shortcuts are used without documentation of the conditions under which they remain valid.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P004-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A bounded-rational procedure can have explicit stopping and applicability rules.", "slug": "bounded_rationality"}], "residual_id": "r:bounded_rationality_design:b008_a11_c7", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b008_a11_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Defaults or heuristics are used but their validity boundaries are undocumented. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Defaults or heuristics are used but their validity boundaries are undocumented."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A bounded-rational procedure can have explicit stopping and applicability rules.", "slug": "bounded_rationality"}], "normalized_requirement": "Defaults or heuristics are used without documented validity boundaries.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Defaults or heuristics are used without documented validity boundaries.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 8, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-008", "ledger_sha256": "23c5493b243dda7f5de441095557263d00cfe02f1c6072d8f67453bfa93d4498"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Bounded Rivalry Governance", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:bounded_rivalry_governance", "slug": "bounded_rivalry_governance"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Rivalrous actors pursue a scarce prize or advantage, but the field lacks sufficient boundaries, rules, metrics, oversight, or harm controls to ensure that winning reflects the intended contribution rather than manipulation, sabotage, collusion, extraction, or runaway escalation.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Rivalrous actors pursue a scarce prize or advantage, but the field lacks sufficient boundaries, rules, metrics, oversight, or harm controls to ensure that winning reflects the intended contribution rather than manipulation, sabotage, collusion, extraction, or runaway escalation."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires multiple rival claimants pursuing the same scarce stake.", "role_mapping": "Rival claimants -> participants; scarce stake -> prize, rank, market, or resource.", "slug": "competition", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b008_a12_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A scarce prize, rank, market, contract, opportunity, status, resource, or survival advantage is being contested. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A scarce prize, rank, market, contract, opportunity, status, resource, or survival advantage is being contested."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Competition", "one_liner": "Rivalrous pursuit of a scarce prize where one party's gain is another's loss.", "page_ref": "prime:competition", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Rival claimants -> participants; scarce stake -> prize, rank, market, or resource.", "slug": "competition", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires multiple rival claimants pursuing the same scarce stake."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Multiple actors contest a scarce prize, rank, market, contract, opportunity, status, resource, or survival advantage.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires negatively coupled payoffs in which relative performance changes rivals' outcomes.", "role_mapping": "Negatively coupled payoffs -> strategic outcome interaction.", "slug": "competition", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b008_a12_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Participants can affect each other’s outcomes through strategic action, not merely through independent performance. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Participants can affect each other’s outcomes through strategic action, not merely through independent performance."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Competition", "one_liner": "Rivalrous pursuit of a scarce prize where one party's gain is another's loss.", "page_ref": "prime:competition", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Negatively coupled payoffs -> strategic outcome interaction.", "slug": "competition", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires negatively coupled payoffs in which relative performance changes rivals' outcomes."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Participants strategically affect one another's outcomes rather than performing independently.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Negatively coupled payoffs need not produce any listed harmful strategy or inequity.", "slug": "competition"}], "residual_id": "r:bounded_rivalry_governance:b008_a12_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b008_a12_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Unmanaged rivalry creates plausible risks of sabotage, collusion, gaming, externalized harm, wasteful escalation, inequity, or lock-in. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Unmanaged rivalry creates plausible risks of sabotage, collusion, gaming, externalized harm, wasteful escalation, inequity, or lock-in."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Negatively coupled payoffs need not produce any listed harmful strategy or inequity.", "slug": "competition"}], "normalized_requirement": "Unmanaged rivalry creates plausible sabotage, collusion, gaming, externalized harm, escalation, inequity, or lock-in.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Unmanaged rivalry creates plausible sabotage, collusion, gaming, externalized harm, escalation, inequity, or lock-in.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Accepted authority need not concern an outcome of designed rivalry.", "slug": "legitimacy"}], "residual_id": "r:bounded_rivalry_governance:b008_a12_c6", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b008_a12_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The legitimacy of outcomes matters to participants, stakeholders, or downstream users. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The legitimacy of outcomes matters to participants, stakeholders, or downstream users."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Accepted authority need not concern an outcome of designed rivalry.", "slug": "legitimacy"}], "normalized_requirement": "Outcome legitimacy matters to participants, stakeholders, or downstream users.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Outcome legitimacy matters to participants, stakeholders, or downstream users.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The desired competitive benefit and the identified harm arise from the same strategic response to the contest rules.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The desired competitive benefit and the identified harm arise from the same strategic response to the contest rules.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The system wants some benefits of rivalry: effort, discovery, price discipline, quality improvement, resilience testing, innovation, prioritization, or selection.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: The system wants some benefits of rivalry: effort, discovery, price discipline, quality improvement, resilience testing, innovation, prioritization, or selection. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The system wants some benefits of rivalry: effort, discovery, price discipline, quality improvement, resilience testing, innovation, prioritization, or selection."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "The system wants some benefits of rivalry: effort, discovery, price discipline, quality improvement, resilience testing, innovation, prioritization, or selection."}, {"display_text": "Rules, metrics, boundaries, judging, eligibility, or enforcement can be modified by design.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Rivalrous actors pursue a scarce prize or advantage, but the field lacks sufficient boundaries, rules, metrics, oversight, or harm controls to ensure that winning reflects the intended contribution rather than manipulation, sabotage, collusion, extraction, or runaway escalation. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: Rules, metrics, boundaries, judging, eligibility, or enforcement can be modified by design. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Rules, metrics, boundaries, judging, eligibility, or enforcement can be modified by design.", "Rivalrous actors pursue a scarce prize or advantage, but the field lacks sufficient boundaries, rules, metrics, oversight, or harm controls to ensure that winning reflects the intended contribution rather than manipulation, sabotage, collusion, extraction, or runaway escalation."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Rules, metrics, boundaries, judging, eligibility, or enforcement can be modified by design."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 8, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-008", "ledger_sha256": "23c5493b243dda7f5de441095557263d00cfe02f1c6072d8f67453bfa93d4498"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Bounded Search Pruning", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:bounded_search_pruning", "slug": "bounded_search_pruning"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 2 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 2}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a tension between breadth and tractability. A decision-maker wants confidence that a better solution is not hidden somewhere in the search space, but the search space is too large to examine in full. Informal pruning saves effort but can discard important branches; exhaustive search preserves breadth but may be impossible.\n\nBounded Search Pruning solves this by making branch exclusion conditional on a valid bound or proof. The branch is not dropped because it looks bad. It is dropped because, under stated assumptions, even its best plausible version cannot matter.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A solution, diagnosis, design, or choice space is too large for exhaustive exploration, but some branches can be proven inferior, infeasible, or unable to beat the current incumbent. Without structured pruning, the search is slow; without bounded justification, pruning may discard the best branch."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Branching is part of the proposed search procedure and need not already structure the unprocessed candidate space.", "slug": "branch_and_bound"}], "residual_id": "r:bounded_search_pruning:b008_a13_c1", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b008_a13_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The candidate space branches into many combinations, hypotheses, designs, assignments, routes, claims, or scenarios. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The candidate space branches into many combinations, hypotheses, designs, assignments, routes, claims, or scenarios."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Branching is part of the proposed search procedure and need not already structure the unprocessed candidate space.", "slug": "branch_and_bound"}], "normalized_requirement": "The candidate space branches combinatorially across hypotheses, designs, assignments, routes, claims, or scenarios.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The candidate space branches combinatorially across hypotheses, designs, assignments, routes, claims, or scenarios.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a nontrivial choice set whose full enumeration or optimization is infeasible or prohibitively costly.", "role_mapping": "Choice set -> search branches; exhaustive evaluation -> full optimization.", "slug": "bounded_rationality", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b008_a13_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Without structured pruning, the search is slow; without bounded justification, pruning may discard the best branch. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Full evaluation of every branch is infeasible, costly, slow, unsafe, or unnecessary.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Full evaluation of every branch is infeasible, costly, slow, unsafe, or unnecessary.", "Without structured pruning, the search is slow; without bounded justification, pruning may discard the best branch."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Bounded Rationality", "one_liner": "Limited decision capacity.", "page_ref": "prime:bounded_rationality", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Choice set -> search branches; exhaustive evaluation -> full optimization.", "slug": "bounded_rationality", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a nontrivial choice set whose full enumeration or optimization is infeasible or prohibitively costly."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Full evaluation of every branch is infeasible, costly, slow, unsafe, or unnecessary.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Some branches can be assigned conservative upper or lower bounds, feasibility certificates, or dominance relationships.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when the search space is too large to examine exhaustively, when the space can be decomposed into branches or regions, and when some branches can be given conservative bounds. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: Some branches can be assigned conservative upper or lower bounds, feasibility certificates, or dominance relationships. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Some branches can be assigned conservative upper or lower bounds, feasibility certificates, or dominance relationships.", "Use this archetype when the search space is too large to examine exhaustively, when the space can be decomposed into branches or regions, and when some branches can be given conservative bounds."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Some branches can be assigned conservative upper or lower bounds, feasibility certificates, or dominance relationships."}, {"display_text": "An incumbent solution, target threshold, mandatory constraint, or best-known explanation exists for comparison.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A solution, diagnosis, design, or choice space is too large for exhaustive exploration, but some branches can be proven inferior, infeasible, or unable to beat the current incumbent. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: An incumbent solution, target threshold, mandatory constraint, or best-known explanation exists for comparison. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["An incumbent solution, target threshold, mandatory constraint, or best-known explanation exists for comparison.", "A solution, diagnosis, design, or choice space is too large for exhaustive exploration, but some branches can be proven inferior, infeasible, or unable to beat the current incumbent."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "An incumbent solution, target threshold, mandatory constraint, or best-known explanation exists for comparison."}, {"display_text": "Stakeholders need confidence that excluded branches were not merely ignored.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this deployment constraint: Stakeholders need confidence that excluded branches were not merely ignored. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders need confidence that excluded branches were not merely ignored."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Stakeholders need confidence that excluded branches were not merely ignored."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 8, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-008", "ledger_sha256": "23c5493b243dda7f5de441095557263d00cfe02f1c6072d8f67453bfa93d4498"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Branching and Merging", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:branching_and_merging", "slug": "branching_and_merging"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is the tension between autonomy and coherence. A system needs independent paths because serial consensus would be too slow, too conservative, or too insensitive to local conditions. At the same time, those paths cannot be allowed to drift indefinitely if the organization, product, policy, document, or knowledge base needs one coherent shared state.\n\nUnmanaged divergence creates stale branches, hidden conflicts, duplicate work, ambiguous authority, lost rationale, and merge debt. The later the conflict is discovered, the more each branch has invested in its own assumptions.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Multiple parties, variants, or lines of work need to proceed independently, but unmanaged divergence prevents later recombination into a coherent shared state."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime is the divergence-and-reconciliation intervention rather than an independent need for autonomy.", "slug": "branching_and_merging"}], "residual_id": "r:branching_and_merging:b008_a14_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b008_a14_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Different teams, agents, jurisdictions, authors, experiments, or design tracks need autonomy to explore or adapt. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Different teams, agents, jurisdictions, authors, experiments, or design tracks need autonomy to explore or adapt."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime is the divergence-and-reconciliation intervention rather than an independent need for autonomy.", "slug": "branching_and_merging"}], "normalized_requirement": "Teams or agents need autonomous local change from a shared starting state.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Teams or agents need autonomous local change from a shared starting state.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P004-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must apply to an organized work process, not an unrelated serial physical object.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The constrained process is work that could otherwise explore or adapt through its organization.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require a single serial route or sequence for the relevant work.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The evaluated arrangement channels the work through one serial path.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail that adopting the serial path would produce the harm, not that it merely might.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The harm is an expected counterfactual consequence of using the serial path.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the negative fitness judgment for the serial arrangement.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The expected harm makes proceeding through that single path unsafe for the work.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail the serial path as a cause of constrained exploration throughput.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "A complete branch is that the serial path would bottleneck exploration.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail the serial path as a cause of reduced capacity for local adaptation.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "A complete branch is that the serial path would suppress local adaptation.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "The work cannot safely proceed as a single serial path because that path would bottleneck exploration or suppress local adaptation.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A single serial work path is unsafe because it would constrain exploration or local adaptation.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P004-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A binding throughput constraint does not require suppressed exploration or a need for divergent work lines.", "slug": "bottleneck"}], "residual_id": "r:branching_and_merging:b008_a14_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b008_a14_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The work cannot safely proceed as a single serial path because it would bottleneck exploration or suppress local adaptation. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The work cannot safely proceed as a single serial path because it would bottleneck exploration or suppress local adaptation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A binding throughput constraint does not require suppressed exploration or a need for divergent work lines.", "slug": "bottleneck"}], "normalized_requirement": "A single serial path would bottleneck exploration or suppress local adaptation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A single serial path would bottleneck exploration or suppress local adaptation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires divergent local replicas to reconverge into one agreed state after updates cease.", "role_mapping": "Locally updated replicas -> parallel outputs; convergence -> common state.", "slug": "eventual_consistency", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b008_a14_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The outputs will eventually need to rejoin a common artifact, operating model, decision, rule set, or system state. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The outputs will eventually need to rejoin a common artifact, operating model, decision, rule set, or system state."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Eventual Consistency", "one_liner": "Distributed copies of shared state are allowed to diverge under local updates, with a deterministic merge guaranteeing they reconverge once updates stop.", "page_ref": "prime:eventual_consistency", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Locally updated replicas -> parallel outputs; convergence -> common state.", "slug": "eventual_consistency", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires divergent local replicas to reconverge into one agreed state after updates cease."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Parallel outputs must eventually reconcile into a common artifact, rule set, decision, model, or system state.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires multiple sites to update the same shared state without prior coordination.", "role_mapping": "Shared replicated state -> overlapping branch subject; local writes -> branch modifications.", "slug": "eventual_consistency", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b008_a14_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Separate branches may modify overlapping assumptions, dependencies, language, interfaces, obligations, or resources. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Separate branches may modify overlapping assumptions, dependencies, language, interfaces, obligations, or resources."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Eventual Consistency", "one_liner": "Distributed copies of shared state are allowed to diverge under local updates, with a deterministic merge guaranteeing they reconverge once updates stop.", "page_ref": "prime:eventual_consistency", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Shared replicated state -> overlapping branch subject; local writes -> branch modifications.", "slug": "eventual_consistency", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires multiple sites to update the same shared state without prior coordination."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Separate branches may update overlapping assumptions, dependencies, language, interfaces, obligations, or resources.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P004-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require divergent work states or lines, not arbitrary operational risk.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The source role is divergence among parallel parties, variants, or lines of work.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must make divergence a source of the risk, not merely a coexisting condition.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The divergence creates the specified harm risk.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail elevated risk; an actuality-only relation does not preserve the source modality.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The source asserts risk or possibility of harm, not that the harm has already occurred.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail risk that a work contribution will fail to survive divergence or reconciliation.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A complete branch is risk that work will be lost.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail risk of an existing incompatibility escaping detection.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "A complete branch is risk that conflict between divergent work states will remain hidden.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail risk that a work line relies on assumptions no longer current.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "A complete branch is risk that assumptions held by divergent work lines will become stale.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail risk of redundant effort arising across separated lines of work.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "A complete branch is risk that effort will be duplicated across divergent work lines.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail risk that divergent variants cannot coexist or recombine compatibly.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "A complete branch is risk that the resulting variants will be incompatible.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Divergence creates risk of lost work, hidden conflict, stale assumptions, duplicated effort, or incompatible variants.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Divergence among work lines creates risk of a specified reconciliation harm.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P004-C08-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A deterministic merge can resolve concurrent updates without lost work, duplication, or incompatibility.", "slug": "eventual_consistency"}], "residual_id": "r:branching_and_merging:b008_a14_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b008_a14_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: There is a risk of lost work, hidden conflict, stale assumptions, duplicated effort, or incompatible variants. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["There is a risk of lost work, hidden conflict, stale assumptions, duplicated effort, or incompatible variants."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A deterministic merge can resolve concurrent updates without lost work, duplication, or incompatibility.", "slug": "eventual_consistency"}], "normalized_requirement": "Divergence creates risk of lost work, hidden conflict, stale assumptions, duplication, or incompatible variants.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Divergence creates risk of lost work, hidden conflict, stale assumptions, duplication, or incompatible variants.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 8, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-008", "ledger_sha256": "23c5493b243dda7f5de441095557263d00cfe02f1c6072d8f67453bfa93d4498"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Bridge Insertion", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:bridge_insertion", "slug": "bridge_insertion"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 5, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is disconnected or poorly connected clusters. Each side may be internally coherent, but there is no reliable edge across the gap. In graph terms, useful regions of the system have weak reachability. In practical terms, people cannot hand off work, systems cannot exchange data, institutions cannot cooperate, or communities cannot access resources that exist elsewhere.\n\nThe difficult part is that the boundary is not simply bad. The separated domains may have different responsibilities, languages, incentives, risk profiles, or forms of expertise. Removing the boundary entirely can destroy useful specialization or create unsafe exposure. The problem is therefore not just separation; it is the absence of a designed crossing.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Two or more clusters, domains, teams, data spaces, communities, or systems cannot exchange value because the graph lacks a viable connecting edge, mediator, interface, or trusted path."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A weak tie already bridges the clusters and carries novelty, so it does not entail that the useful state remains trapped.", "slug": "weak_ties"}], "residual_id": "r:bridge_insertion:b008_a15_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b008_a15_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Useful work, knowledge, resources, or decisions are trapped inside separated clusters. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Useful work, knowledge, resources, or decisions are trapped inside separated clusters."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A weak tie already bridges the clusters and carries novelty, so it does not entail that the useful state remains trapped.", "slug": "weak_ties"}], "normalized_requirement": "Useful work, knowledge, resources, or decisions are trapped inside otherwise separated clusters.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Useful work, knowledge, resources, or decisions are trapped inside otherwise separated clusters.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P004-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O9"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require a cross-side relation; a single cluster cannot satisfy the condition.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "At least two distinct clusters or sides participate in the attempted interaction.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern unmediated interaction between the sides, not a failure inside one side.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The relevant exchange path is direct interaction between those sides.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail unsuccessful direct interaction, not merely friction within a successful exchange.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The direct interaction fails.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must make the cross-side mismatch causal for failure rather than incidental.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "An incompatibility between the sides causes the direct-interaction failure.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail a semantic or linguistic mismatch between the interacting sides.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "A complete branch is incompatibility in the languages used by the sides.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail a representational or technical format mismatch between the sides.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "A complete branch is incompatibility in the formats used by the sides.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail conflicting normative expectations between the interacting sides.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "A complete branch is incompatibility in the norms followed by the sides.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail incentive misalignment that blocks direct cross-side interaction.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "A complete branch is incompatibility in the incentives facing the sides.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail conflicting trust requirements or assumptions between the sides.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "A complete branch is incompatibility in the sides' trust assumptions.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Direct interaction fails because clusters use incompatible languages, formats, norms, incentives, or trust assumptions.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Direct interaction between clusters fails because the clusters differ incompatibly on a specified basis.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P004-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A stable exchange contract can connect compatible systems and does not require prior direct-interaction failure.", "slug": "interface"}], "residual_id": "r:bridge_insertion:b008_a15_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b008_a15_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Direct interaction fails because the sides use different languages, formats, norms, incentives, or trust assumptions. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Direct interaction fails because the sides use different languages, formats, norms, incentives, or trust assumptions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A stable exchange contract can connect compatible systems and does not require prior direct-interaction failure.", "slug": "interface"}], "normalized_requirement": "Direct interaction fails because clusters use incompatible languages, formats, norms, incentives, or trust assumptions.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Direct interaction fails because clusters use incompatible languages, formats, norms, incentives, or trust assumptions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A sparse bridge can be robust and need not be overloaded, informal, or the only existing path.", "slug": "weak_ties"}], "residual_id": "r:bridge_insertion:b008_a15_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b008_a15_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The only existing path is informal, brittle, overloaded, or dependent on a single relationship. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The only existing path is informal, brittle, overloaded, or dependent on a single relationship."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A sparse bridge can be robust and need not be overloaded, informal, or the only existing path.", "slug": "weak_ties"}], "normalized_requirement": "The only existing cross-cluster path is informal, brittle, overloaded, or dependent on one relationship.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The only existing cross-cluster path is informal, brittle, overloaded, or dependent on one relationship.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Independent modules do not require full integration to be costly or politically unacceptable.", "slug": "modularity"}], "residual_id": "r:bridge_insertion:b008_a15_c4", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b008_a15_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Separation protects local coherence, specialization, trust, and autonomy, but excessive separation blocks useful exchange. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Full integration would be too costly, risky, politically unacceptable, or destructive of useful local autonomy.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Full integration would be too costly, risky, politically unacceptable, or destructive of useful local autonomy.", "Separation protects local coherence, specialization, trust, and autonomy, but excessive separation blocks useful exchange."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Independent modules do not require full integration to be costly or politically unacceptable.", "slug": "modularity"}], "normalized_requirement": "Full integration would be too costly, risky, politically unacceptable, or destructive of useful local autonomy.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Full integration would be too costly, risky, politically unacceptable, or destructive of useful local autonomy.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "A limited bridge can transfer the trapped value while preserving each cluster's internal autonomy.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A limited bridge can transfer the trapped value while preserving each cluster's internal autonomy.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 8, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-008", "ledger_sha256": "23c5493b243dda7f5de441095557263d00cfe02f1c6072d8f67453bfa93d4498"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Buffering", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:buffering", "slug": "buffering"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 1 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 1}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A source and receiver have a temporal rate or cadence mismatch, causing otherwise useful flow to arrive before it can be absorbed or used.", "explanation_source": {"field": "diagnostic_head", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A source and receiver have a temporal rate or cadence mismatch, causing otherwise useful flow to arrive before it can be absorbed or used."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "This branch preserves the complete remedy-free diagnostic route; goals, feasibility clauses, gates, deployment constraints, and supporting context remain outside the DNF."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "EXT001-C013", "dnf": [["EXT001-U013-O1"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"obligation_id": "EXT001-U013-O1", "predicate": "Arrival, production, or demand occurs at a rate or cadence that does not match immediate receiving capacity."}], "predicate": "Arrival, production, or demand occurs at a rate or cadence that does not match immediate receiving capacity.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Arrival, production, or demand occurs at a rate or cadence that does not match immediate receiving capacity.", "unit_id": "EXT001-U013"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"catalog_exhaustion": "CONDITION_LEVEL", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Arrival, production, or demand occurs at a rate or cadence that does not match immediate receiving capacity.", "slug": "cadence"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Arrival, production, or demand occurs at a rate or cadence that does not match immediate receiving capacity.", "slug": "unevenness_waste"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Arrival, production, or demand occurs at a rate or cadence that does not match immediate receiving capacity.", "slug": "input_pressure"}], "residual_id": "EXT001:buffering:C01", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding."}}, "condition_id": "ext001_buffering_a01", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored essence_one_line, compression_statement, components fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: Arrival, production, or demand occurs at a rate or cadence that does not match immediate receiving capacity.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Arrival, production, or demand occurs at a rate or cadence that does not match immediate receiving capacity."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Arrival, production, or demand occurs at a rate or cadence that does not match immediate receiving capacity.", "slug": "cadence"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Arrival, production, or demand occurs at a rate or cadence that does not match immediate receiving capacity.", "slug": "unevenness_waste"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Arrival, production, or demand occurs at a rate or cadence that does not match immediate receiving capacity.", "slug": "input_pressure"}], "normalized_requirement": "Arrival, production, or demand occurs at a rate or cadence that does not match immediate receiving capacity.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Arrival, production, or demand occurs at a rate or cadence that does not match immediate receiving capacity.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The mismatch is sufficiently transient that delayed release can preserve useful flow.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored essence_one_line, compression_statement, components fields; the source file was not modified. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: The mismatch is sufficiently transient that delayed release can preserve useful flow. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The mismatch is sufficiently transient that delayed release can preserve useful flow.", "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored essence_one_line, compression_statement, components fields; the source file was not modified."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "The mismatch is sufficiently transient that delayed release can preserve useful flow."}, {"display_text": "Intermediate capacity can hold the quantity without unacceptable loss or contamination.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored essence_one_line, compression_statement, components fields; the source file was not modified. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: Intermediate capacity can hold the quantity without unacceptable loss or contamination. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Intermediate capacity can hold the quantity without unacceptable loss or contamination.", "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored essence_one_line, compression_statement, components fields; the source file was not modified."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Intermediate capacity can hold the quantity without unacceptable loss or contamination."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"candidate_ledger_sha256": "96f72d2139077fd57bf795048ebef33b3fd574b20963170080ec916b5b3b92fe", "extension_id": "new-archetypes-extension-001", "ledger_id": "prime-production-v1.2-extension-001", "ledger_sha256": "9644520614744632d1d36da44b1acd77ce432852c6083eb871203521c166efce"}, "base_projection_sha256": "841e0c7f3cb8e8054475ad29a8a14745a416b4fc115559a44878b94292e673ec", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "ca09ed9fe1598ce7072755b530de5553f5ee0a7cd64ae82d9e4a4e2149a37788", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Bulkhead Isolation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:bulkhead_isolation", "slug": "bulkhead_isolation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 1 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 1}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Shared resources, state, or dependencies allow a local failure, overload, contamination, or exhaustion event to propagate into otherwise viable parts of the system.", "explanation_source": {"field": "diagnostic_head", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Shared resources, state, or dependencies allow a local failure, overload, contamination, or exhaustion event to propagate into otherwise viable parts of the system."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "This branch preserves the complete remedy-free diagnostic route; goals, feasibility clauses, gates, deployment constraints, and supporting context remain outside the DNF."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Every systemic-risk instance contains a local failure whose effects propagate through coupling beyond its origin toward correlated system failure.", "role_mapping": "The local shock maps to the local failure; network coupling maps to shared resources, state, capacity, or dependencies.", "slug": "systemic_risk", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "ext001_bulkhead_isolation_a01", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored essence_one_line, compression_statement, components fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: A local failure can propagate beyond its origin through shared resources, state, capacity, or dependencies.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A local failure can propagate beyond its origin through shared resources, state, capacity, or dependencies."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Systemic Risk", "one_liner": "Risk that local failures propagate into system-wide collapse.", "page_ref": "prime:systemic_risk", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "The local shock maps to the local failure; network coupling maps to shared resources, state, capacity, or dependencies.", "slug": "systemic_risk", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Every systemic-risk instance contains a local failure whose effects propagate through coupling beyond its origin toward correlated system failure."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A local failure can propagate beyond its origin through shared resources, state, capacity, or dependencies.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The system can be divided into bounded failure domains without destroying its protected function.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored essence_one_line, compression_statement, components fields; the source file was not modified. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: The system can be divided into bounded failure domains without destroying its protected function. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The system can be divided into bounded failure domains without destroying its protected function.", "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored essence_one_line, compression_statement, components fields; the source file was not modified."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "The system can be divided into bounded failure domains without destroying its protected function."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"candidate_ledger_sha256": "96f72d2139077fd57bf795048ebef33b3fd574b20963170080ec916b5b3b92fe", "extension_id": "new-archetypes-extension-001", "ledger_id": "prime-production-v1.2-extension-001", "ledger_sha256": "9644520614744632d1d36da44b1acd77ce432852c6083eb871203521c166efce"}, "base_projection_sha256": "841e0c7f3cb8e8054475ad29a8a14745a416b4fc115559a44878b94292e673ec", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "ca09ed9fe1598ce7072755b530de5553f5ee0a7cd64ae82d9e4a4e2149a37788", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Bycatch-Aware Selective Intervention Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:bycatch_aware_selective_intervention_design", "slug": "bycatch_aware_selective_intervention_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A selective process is optimized for target capture, but the selector cannot perfectly distinguish target from non-target classes. Because the governing metric counts target yield more than non-target harm, the system has weak pressure to detect, release, compensate, or redesign around collateral capture.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A selective process is optimized for target capture, but the selector cannot perfectly distinguish target from non-target classes. Because the governing metric counts target yield more than non-target harm, the system has weak pressure to detect, release, compensate, or redesign around collateral capture."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a selective sorting, capture, classification, or enforcement process aimed at a target class.", "role_mapping": "Selective process -> intervention; target class -> intended target.", "slug": "bycatch", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b009_a01_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Selective intervention is deployed. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Selective intervention is deployed"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Bycatch", "one_liner": "A selective process aimed at one target class also captures non-target classes because of the selector's finite specificity, and the harm persists because the success metric counts only the target.", "page_ref": "prime:bycatch", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Selective process -> intervention; target class -> intended target.", "slug": "bycatch", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a selective sorting, capture, classification, or enforcement process aimed at a target class."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A selective intervention or capture process is operating on a target class.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Finite selector specificity is a mandatory cause of non-target capture in the prime.", "role_mapping": "Finite specificity -> imperfect intervention selectivity.", "slug": "bycatch", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b009_a01_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Specificity is finite. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Specificity is finite"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Bycatch", "one_liner": "A selective process aimed at one target class also captures non-target classes because of the selector's finite specificity, and the harm persists because the success metric counts only the target.", "page_ref": "prime:bycatch", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Finite specificity -> imperfect intervention selectivity.", "slug": "bycatch", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Finite selector specificity is a mandatory cause of non-target capture in the prime."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The selector has finite specificity and cannot perfectly distinguish target from non-target at action time.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires target and non-target capture by the same selective act.", "role_mapping": "Non-target classes -> exposed bycatch; same act -> shared intervention.", "slug": "bycatch", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b009_a01_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Non-target classes are exposed. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Non-target classes are exposed"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Bycatch", "one_liner": "A selective process aimed at one target class also captures non-target classes because of the selector's finite specificity, and the harm persists because the success metric counts only the target.", "page_ref": "prime:bycatch", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Non-target classes -> exposed bycatch; same act -> shared intervention.", "slug": "bycatch", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires target and non-target capture by the same selective act."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Non-target classes are exposed to the same act as the target class.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires metric invisibility in which the process ledger counts target capture but omits non-target burden.", "role_mapping": "Target ledger -> success metric; omitted burden -> metric blind spot.", "slug": "bycatch", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b009_a01_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Success metric is target-centered. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Success metric is target-centered"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Bycatch", "one_liner": "A selective process aimed at one target class also captures non-target classes because of the selector's finite specificity, and the harm persists because the success metric counts only the target.", "page_ref": "prime:bycatch", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Target ledger -> success metric; omitted burden -> metric blind spot.", "slug": "bycatch", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires metric invisibility in which the process ledger counts target capture but omits non-target burden."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The intervention's success metric counts target outcomes while excluding non-target burden.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P004-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern collateral non-target harm, not harm to the intended intervention target.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The affected content is harm to a non-target of a selective intervention.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include a routine review channel into which the harm would otherwise enter.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The destination role is the intervention system's ordinary review process.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail exclusion or omission from ordinary review, not merely delayed resolution after review.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The non-target harm does not enter ordinary review through the specified route.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must make the delay or weak voicing responsible for omission from routine review.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The branch-specific timing or voicing condition causes the review-entry failure.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail timing late enough to prevent the harm from entering the ordinary review cycle.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "A complete branch is that the non-target harm becomes apparent or available only after the ordinary review opportunity.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include a source role capable of expressing the collateral harm to reviewers.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "In the voicing branch, an affected or knowledgeable party supplies the signal about non-target harm.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail insufficient voice strength relative to review entry, not total absence of all expression.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "A complete branch is that the harm is voiced below the strength needed to enter ordinary review.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Non-target harm fails to enter ordinary review because its appearance is delayed or it is voiced too weakly.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Non-target harm does not enter ordinary review through either delayed availability or insufficient voicing.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P004-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Bycatch can be immediate and loudly contested even though the target-centered metric omits it.", "slug": "bycatch"}], "residual_id": "r:bycatch_aware_selective_intervention_design:b009_a01_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b009_a01_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Non-target harm is delayed or weakly voiced. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Non-target harm is delayed or weakly voiced"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Bycatch can be immediate and loudly contested even though the target-centered metric omits it.", "slug": "bycatch"}], "normalized_requirement": "Non-target harm is delayed or voiced too weakly to enter ordinary review.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Non-target harm is delayed or voiced too weakly to enter ordinary review.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime does not require captured non-targets or their harm to be irreversible or costly to remedy.", "slug": "bycatch"}], "residual_id": "r:bycatch_aware_selective_intervention_design:b009_a01_c6", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b009_a01_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Capture or harm is costly to reverse. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Capture or harm is costly to reverse"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime does not require captured non-targets or their harm to be irreversible or costly to remedy.", "slug": "bycatch"}], "normalized_requirement": "Non-target capture or harm is costly to reverse.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Non-target capture or harm is costly to reverse.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 9, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-009", "ledger_sha256": "980e3ef99b36dfb5278a681e2b3f6f60e5515ebd167f0101ce54743d45ecdc82"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Cadence Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:cadence_design", "slug": "cadence_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 5, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is attention-dependent recurrence. A recurring need exists, but every occurrence depends on someone remembering, worrying, convening, or reacting. This creates two opposite failures. Sometimes the work is neglected until consequences appear. Other times the system overreacts with too many reminders, meetings, status checks, or ad hoc escalations.\n\nThe deeper tension is that recurrence saves effort only after it has been designed. Before that, recurrence consumes attention because timing, ownership, participants, and outputs are repeatedly rediscovered. Cadence Design reduces this repeated decision burden while preserving enough flexibility to avoid stale ritual.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A recurring activity is needed, but timing is irregular, reactive, forgotten, or too dependent on individual attention."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A specified recurrence rhythm is the missing design, not evidence that no rhythm exists.", "slug": "cadence"}], "residual_id": "r:cadence_design:b009_a02_c1", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_AMBIGUITY", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b009_a02_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Recurring work has no designed rhythm. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Recurring work has no designed rhythm"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A specified recurrence rhythm is the missing design, not evidence that no rhythm exists.", "slug": "cadence"}], "normalized_requirement": "Recurring work has no deliberately designed rhythm or cadence.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_AMBIGUITY", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Recurring work has no deliberately designed rhythm or cadence.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P004-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern repeated execution, not a one-time task or an abstract reminder.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The dependent activity is execution of recurring work.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must assign memory and attention requirements to responsible human or organizational participants.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The supporting actors are participants responsible for carrying out the recurring work.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must make participant memory a necessary support for execution rather than an optional convenience.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Execution depends on participants remembering that the work must be done.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must make active participant attention necessary in addition to remembering.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Execution also depends on participants allocating attention to the work.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve correct timing; untimed awareness or eventual attention is insufficient.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Remembering and attention allocation must occur at the time required for execution.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must encode a load-bearing dependency from those participant capacities to execution.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "Failure of the memory-and-attention support can prevent timely execution of the recurring work.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Execution of recurring work depends on participants remembering and allocating attention at the right time.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Timely execution of recurring work depends on participant memory and attention allocation.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P004-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Finite attention does not require recurring work or unaided temporal execution.", "slug": "attentional_capacity"}], "residual_id": "r:cadence_design:b009_a02_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b009_a02_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Attention-dependent execution. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Attention-dependent execution"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Finite attention does not require recurring work or unaided temporal execution.", "slug": "attentional_capacity"}], "normalized_requirement": "Execution of recurring work depends on participants remembering and allocating attention at the right time.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Execution of recurring work depends on participants remembering and allocating attention at the right time.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P004-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern when recurring work is initiated or executed, not unrelated urgency.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The source role is the timing or scheduling of recurring work.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require response-driven timing, not merely a fast but planned cadence.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The work timing is reactive rather than established in advance.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must make urgency the consequence rather than delay, cost, or another generic harm.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The resulting state is urgency in carrying out the work.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail the direction from reactive timing to urgency, not reverse or correlate them.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Reactive timing causes the urgency.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve counterfactual avoidability rather than treat urgency as unavoidable.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The urgency could be avoided under a different timing arrangement.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "Reactive timing of recurring work creates avoidable urgency.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Reactive scheduling causes urgency that a different timing arrangement could avoid.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P004-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A fast-moving reference creates persistent tracking error, not necessarily reactive urgency.", "slug": "reference_cadence_exceeds_tracking_bandwidth"}], "residual_id": "r:cadence_design:b009_a02_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b009_a02_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A recurring activity is needed, but timing is irregular, reactive, forgotten, or too dependent on individual attention. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Reactive timing creates avoidable urgency.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Reactive timing creates avoidable urgency", "A recurring activity is needed, but timing is irregular, reactive, forgotten, or too dependent on individual attention."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A fast-moving reference creates persistent tracking error, not necessarily reactive urgency.", "slug": "reference_cadence_exceeds_tracking_bandwidth"}], "normalized_requirement": "Reactive timing creates avoidable urgency.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Reactive timing creates avoidable urgency.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Mismatched rates need not arise from over-triggering or create noise and fatigue.", "slug": "tempo_mismatch"}], "residual_id": "r:cadence_design:b009_a02_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b009_a02_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Over-triggering creates noise or fatigue. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Over-triggering creates noise or fatigue"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Mismatched rates need not arise from over-triggering or create noise and fatigue.", "slug": "tempo_mismatch"}], "normalized_requirement": "Over-triggering creates signal noise or participant fatigue.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Over-triggering creates signal noise or participant fatigue.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The work's current timing rule is itself causing misses, urgency, or coordination cost rather than merely reflecting variable demand.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The work's current timing rule is itself causing misses, urgency, or coordination cost rather than merely reflecting variable demand.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Multiple participants need predictable coordination.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: Multiple participants need predictable coordination. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Multiple participants need predictable coordination"]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Multiple participants need predictable coordination"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 9, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-009", "ledger_sha256": "980e3ef99b36dfb5278a681e2b3f6f60e5515ebd167f0101ce54743d45ecdc82"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Calm-State Fragility Guarding", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:calm_state_fragility_guarding", "slug": "calm_state_fragility_guarding"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 6, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 6, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "6 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system interprets prolonged stability as evidence that less vigilance, less slack, more exposure, and weaker response capacity are safe, thereby creating the fragility that the calm conceals.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system interprets prolonged stability as evidence that less vigilance, less slack, more exposure, and weaker response capacity are safe, thereby creating the fragility that the calm conceals."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires an interval with rare adverse outcomes that observers misread as safety.", "role_mapping": "Quiet window -> recent stable history; safety misreading -> risk feels abstract.", "slug": "stability_induced_fragility", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b009_a03_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Recent operating history is quiet, profitable, reliable, or incident-free for long enough that risk feels abstract. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Recent operating history is quiet, profitable, reliable, or incident-free for long enough that risk feels abstract."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Stability-Induced Fragility", "one_liner": "Prolonged calm endogenously erodes the response capacity that stressors keep exercised.", "page_ref": "prime:stability_induced_fragility", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Quiet window -> recent stable history; safety misreading -> risk feels abstract.", "slug": "stability_induced_fragility", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires an interval with rare adverse outcomes that observers misread as safety."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A prolonged quiet or incident-free operating window makes risk feel abstract.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires agents to respond to absent bad news by lowering buffers, deferring maintenance, skipping drills, or relaxing constraints.", "role_mapping": "Endogenous response -> removal of idle-looking protection.", "slug": "stability_induced_fragility", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b009_a03_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Budget, staffing, attention, or political pressure rewards removing idle-looking reserves, rehearsals, inspections, or controls. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Budget, staffing, attention, or political pressure rewards removing idle-looking reserves, rehearsals, inspections, or controls."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Stability-Induced Fragility", "one_liner": "Prolonged calm endogenously erodes the response capacity that stressors keep exercised.", "page_ref": "prime:stability_induced_fragility", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Endogenous response -> removal of idle-looking protection.", "slug": "stability_induced_fragility", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires agents to respond to absent bad news by lowering buffers, deferring maintenance, skipping drills, or relaxing constraints."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Incentives reward removing idle-looking reserves, rehearsals, inspections, or controls during the quiet period.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires latent exposure or fragility to increase under risk-taking responses to calm.", "role_mapping": "Latent fragility -> leverage or concentration; calm update -> risk increase.", "slug": "stability_induced_fragility", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b009_a03_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Agents increase leverage, concentration, workload, reach, or complexity because observed volatility is low. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Agents increase leverage, concentration, workload, reach, or complexity because observed volatility is low."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Stability-Induced Fragility", "one_liner": "Prolonged calm endogenously erodes the response capacity that stressors keep exercised.", "page_ref": "prime:stability_induced_fragility", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Latent fragility -> leverage or concentration; calm update -> risk increase.", "slug": "stability_induced_fragility", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires latent exposure or fragility to increase under risk-taking responses to calm."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Actors increase leverage, concentration, workload, reach, or complexity because observed volatility is low.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires prolonged absence of stressors to let response machinery and drills atrophy.", "role_mapping": "Response capacity -> rare-event skill and fallback path; absent exercise -> nonpractice.", "slug": "stability_induced_fragility", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b009_a03_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Rare-event skills, escalation relationships, fallback paths, manual procedures, or incident command routines are not practiced. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Rare-event skills, escalation relationships, fallback paths, manual procedures, or incident command routines are not practiced."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Stability-Induced Fragility", "one_liner": "Prolonged calm endogenously erodes the response capacity that stressors keep exercised.", "page_ref": "prime:stability_induced_fragility", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Response capacity -> rare-event skill and fallback path; absent exercise -> nonpractice.", "slug": "stability_induced_fragility", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires prolonged absence of stressors to let response machinery and drills atrophy."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Rare-event skills, escalation paths, fallback procedures, or incident routines are not practiced.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires outside observers to infer safety from the quiet window.", "role_mapping": "Safety misreading -> governance inference from recent stability.", "slug": "stability_induced_fragility", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b009_a03_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Risk models, dashboards, or governance reviews use recent stability as the main evidence of safety. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Risk models, dashboards, or governance reviews use recent stability as the main evidence of safety."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Stability-Induced Fragility", "one_liner": "Prolonged calm endogenously erodes the response capacity that stressors keep exercised.", "page_ref": "prime:stability_induced_fragility", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Safety misreading -> governance inference from recent stability.", "slug": "stability_induced_fragility", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires outside observers to infer safety from the quiet window."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Risk models or reviews treat recent stability as primary evidence of safety.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's production-through-absence invariant requires removal of the stressors that maintained response capacity.", "role_mapping": "Absent stressor -> lost capability exercise.", "slug": "stability_induced_fragility", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b009_a03_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Past stressors that once kept capability exercised have disappeared, been suppressed, or been forgotten. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Past stressors that once kept capability exercised have disappeared, been suppressed, or been forgotten."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Stability-Induced Fragility", "one_liner": "Prolonged calm endogenously erodes the response capacity that stressors keep exercised.", "page_ref": "prime:stability_induced_fragility", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Absent stressor -> lost capability exercise.", "slug": "stability_induced_fragility", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's production-through-absence invariant requires removal of the stressors that maintained response capacity."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Stressors that once exercised capability have disappeared, been suppressed, or been forgotten.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 9, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-009", "ledger_sha256": "980e3ef99b36dfb5278a681e2b3f6f60e5515ebd167f0101ce54743d45ecdc82"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Canonical Classification", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:canonical_classification", "slug": "canonical_classification"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 3, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is inconsistent treatment caused by unstable membership. The system has entities, cases, records, people, events, problems, or artifacts that need to be grouped, but the grouping rules are unclear. Different actors use different names, classify the same case differently, or attach different consequences to the same label.\n\nThis produces repeated debates, misrouting, incomparable data, hidden unfairness, and ad hoc exceptions. The deeper tension is that stable categories help systems act at scale, while real cases are messy and any boundary can oversimplify important differences.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Entities are treated inconsistently because there is no stable classification scheme, no explicit membership rule, or no agreed connection between class assignment and downstream handling."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P004-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require multiple classifiers; repeated decisions by one actor alone are insufficient.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "At least two distinct actors perform category assignments.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must compare classifications of a shared entity, not different entities in different categories.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The object being classified is one and the same entity across actors.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail actor-to-entity category assignment rather than passive category resemblance.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Each actor assigns a category to that shared entity.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail differing category outcomes, not merely separate identical assignments.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The actors' assignments contain at least two different categories.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve disagreement rather than convergence on one category.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The cross-actor classifications are inconsistent for the shared entity.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Different actors assign the same entity to different categories.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Multiple actors classify one common entity into at least two different categories.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P004-C13-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Assigning items to categories does not require inter-actor disagreement.", "slug": "classification"}], "residual_id": "r:canonical_classification:b009_a04_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b009_a04_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Different actors place the same entity in different categories. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Different actors place the same entity in different categories."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "An instance with one annotator or unanimous classification removes the disagreement zone constitutive of label ambiguity; no complete DSA instance preserves the candidate while falsifying the unit.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Label Ambiguity", "one_liner": "Diagnose a headline accuracy figure as a blend of two measurements — model capability in the class interior where annotators agree, and mere adjudication agreement in the boundary zone where reasonable experts split — by stratifying metrics on the inter-annotator agreement rate.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:label_ambiguity", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "label_ambiguity"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "label_ambiguity", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P004-C13-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every label-ambiguity instance includes multiple expert annotators assigning differing hard categories to the same boundary-region entity; disagreement and the two-category quantifier are constitutive, so the match is direct."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Different actors assign the same entity to different categories.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P004-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must apply to information artifacts whose categories support comparison, not arbitrary physical objects.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The compared entities are informational outputs such as reports, records, or metrics.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must make classification categories the basis of the cross-output comparison problem.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The mediating structure is the category scheme used to classify content in those outputs.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail failed comparability rather than reduced convenience or mere formatting difference.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The informational outputs are not comparable across the relevant sources, places, or times.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must make category structure causal for incomparability rather than incidental.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The branch-specific category defect causes the cross-output incomparability.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail category change or instability sufficient to defeat stable comparison.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "A complete branch is that category meanings or boundaries are unstable across relevant comparisons.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail incompatible local category definitions across the compared contexts.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "A complete branch is that category meanings or boundaries are defined only locally.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Informational outputs such as reports, records, or metrics are incomparable because their categories are unstable or locally defined.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Category instability or local category definition prevents comparison across informational outputs.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P004-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Graded category membership does not require incompatible local definitions or report incomparability.", "slug": "prototype_theory"}], "residual_id": "r:canonical_classification:b009_a04_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b009_a04_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Reports, records, or metrics are not comparable because categories are unstable or locally defined. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Reports, records, or metrics are not comparable because categories are unstable or locally defined."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "If the reference label drifts away from the construct, equal metric values no longer measure the same validity claim; preserving gold-standard erosion defeats the proposed comparable-output counterexample.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Gold-Standard Erosion", "one_liner": "Recognize that a model scored against a mutable reference label can show stable metrics while its real validity silently degrades, because the answer key — not the model — has drifted away from the construct it once operationalized.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:gold_standard_erosion", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "gold_standard_erosion"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "gold_standard_erosion", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P004-C14-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every gold-standard-erosion instance compares evaluation outputs against a reference category whose meaning drifts. Because the category changes, the outputs lose construct-stable cross-time comparability; the instability branch is directly entailed."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Reports, records, or metrics are incomparable because categories are locally defined or unstable.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P004-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern ambiguous or marginal classification cases, not ordinary category members.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The source role is a case near or across a classification boundary.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail recurrence; one isolated difficult case is insufficient.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The consequence occurs repeatedly across boundary-case handling.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must make classification marginality causal for the recurring outcome.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The boundary status of the cases produces the branch-specific handling consequence.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail recurring disagreement over classification or handling of boundary cases.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A complete branch is that boundary cases repeatedly generate disputes among relevant actors.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail recurring departure from standard rules for classification edge cases.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "A complete branch is that boundary cases repeatedly require exceptions to normal classification handling.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail recurring human-driven category reassignment for boundary cases.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "A complete branch is that boundary cases repeatedly undergo manual reassignment between categories.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Boundary cases repeatedly produce disputes, exceptions, or manual reassignment.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Classification boundary cases recurrently cause a specified handling disruption.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P004-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A classification scheme can have stable handling for boundary cases.", "slug": "classification"}], "residual_id": "r:canonical_classification:b009_a04_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b009_a04_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Edge cases repeatedly trigger disputes, exceptions, or manual reassignment. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Edge cases repeatedly trigger disputes, exceptions, or manual reassignment."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "An isolated case without recurring disagreement does not instantiate the systematic boundary disagreement zone required by label ambiguity; the dispute branch remains true.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Label Ambiguity", "one_liner": "Diagnose a headline accuracy figure as a blend of two measurements — model capability in the class interior where annotators agree, and mere adjudication agreement in the boundary zone where reasonable experts split — by stratifying metrics on the inter-annotator agreement rate.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:label_ambiguity", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "label_ambiguity"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "label_ambiguity", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P004-C15-U1", "why_it_fits": "Label ambiguity is defined by a systematic zone of classification boundary cases on which expert annotators repeatedly disagree. This directly satisfies the recurring-dispute branch without borrowing another DNF branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A canon with a settled, uncontested boundary would remove the ongoing policing and recurrent boundary struggle made constitutive by the exact record; the counterexample is not a canon instance.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Canon", "one_liner": "The bounded, institutionally policed set of works a tradition treats as exemplary and interpretively authoritative — taught as models, cited to adjudicate disputes, and contested at the boundary — as distinct from the totality of what it has produced or widely read.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:canon", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "canon"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "canon", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P004-C15-U1", "why_it_fits": "Canon is definitionally boundary-policed and its inclusion boundary is a recurrent site of struggle among institutional gatekeepers. Works at that boundary repeatedly generate disputes, directly satisfying the dispute branch."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Boundary cases repeatedly produce disputes, exceptions, or manual reassignment.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P005-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern an established category label, not a wholly absent category system.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The represented object is an existing named classification category.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require category-membership rules, not unrelated descriptive metadata.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The missing object is an explicit criterion for deciding entity membership in that category.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must connect the missing criteria directionally to assignment of entities into the category.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Membership criteria would govern the mapping from entities to the named category.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail absence of explicit membership semantics rather than merely ambiguous wording.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The named category does not specify explicit membership criteria.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Category names exist without explicit membership criteria.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Named categories lack explicit rules for determining membership.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P005-C01-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P005-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern an established category label, not a wholly absent category system.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The represented object is an existing named classification category.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern effects of class membership, not the rule for determining membership itself.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The missing object is downstream handling or consequences attached to category assignment.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the direction from class assignment to subsequent handling or effect.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The downstream consequence would follow from assignment of an entity to the named category.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail absent assignment consequences rather than merely undesirable stated consequences.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The named category does not specify those downstream consequences.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Category names exist without specified downstream consequences of assignment.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Named categories lack specified consequences for entities assigned to them.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P005-C01-U2"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A standard representation does not require missing category-membership semantics.", "slug": "canonical_form"}], "residual_id": "r:canonical_classification:b009_a04_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b009_a04_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Names exist but do not specify membership criteria or downstream consequences. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Names exist but do not specify membership criteria or downstream consequences."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 2, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 2}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A standard representation does not require missing category-membership semantics.", "slug": "canonical_form"}], "normalized_requirement": "Category names exist without explicit membership criteria or downstream consequences.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 2 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Category names exist without explicit membership criteria or downstream consequences.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A repeated decision depends on what kind of case, person, item, record, problem, or event is being handled.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The system has entities, cases, records, people, events, problems, or artifacts that need to be grouped, but the grouping rules are unclear. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: A repeated decision depends on what kind of case, person, item, record, problem, or event is being handled. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A repeated decision depends on what kind of case, person, item, record, problem, or event is being handled.", "The system has entities, cases, records, people, events, problems, or artifacts that need to be grouped, but the grouping rules are unclear."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "A repeated decision depends on what kind of case, person, item, record, problem, or event is being handled."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 9, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-009", "ledger_sha256": "980e3ef99b36dfb5278a681e2b3f6f60e5515ebd167f0101ce54743d45ecdc82"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Canonical Ordering", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:canonical_ordering", "slug": "canonical_ordering"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 4 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is sequence ambiguity. The same items appear in different orders across people, tools, runs, reports, or versions. Because the sequence is unstable, actors cannot tell whether they are seeing a real change or an incidental rearrangement.\n\nThis problem often hides behind ordinary-looking details. A database returns rows in different orders. A report changes its layout. A policy file lists obligations differently across departments. A generated configuration diff shows hundreds of changes that are only key-order changes. A rule engine produces different results because equal rules were evaluated in an unspecified order.\n\nCanonical Ordering treats these as symptoms of an ungoverned order relation.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Items, rules, records, actions, or representations are arranged differently across contexts, causing inconsistent comparison, interpretation, replay, processing, or coordination."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P005-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include multiple orderable input items rather than one indivisible input.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The input role is a collection or sequence of items with a selectable order.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern a downstream computation or artifact derived from the ordered items.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The dependent role is a downstream representation, comparison artifact, integrity artifact, index, or replay operation.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail direction from input ordering to downstream result or behavior.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The downstream artifact or operation depends on the order of the input items.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve order sensitivity, not merely record a conventional order with no effect.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A change in item order can change the downstream artifact or operation.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "Downstream representations, hashes, diffs, signatures, indexes, or replay logs depend on item order.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A downstream computational artifact or operation is sensitive to the order of its input items.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P005-C02-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An ordered process need not feed hashes, signatures, or comparison artifacts.", "slug": "sequencing"}], "residual_id": "r:canonical_ordering:b009_a05_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b009_a05_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Downstream systems rely on ordered representations, hashes, diffs, signatures, indexes, or replay logs. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Downstream systems rely on ordered representations, hashes, diffs, signatures, indexes, or replay logs."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Attempted a complete focus-order-failure instance whose traversal is unchanged when DOM or tabindex order changes; the exact traversal-order role excludes that witness.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Focus-Order Failure", "one_liner": "The accessibility defect in which an interface advances programmatic focus (Tab navigation, screen-reader linearization) in a sequence that diverges from the task's semantic order — invisible to visual review, and sometimes placing a confirmation control before the content it confirms.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:focus_order_failure", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "focus_order_failure"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "focus_order_failure", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P005-C02-U1", "why_it_fits": "The focusable nodes are orderable inputs, programmatic focus traversal is the downstream operation, and the exact record fixes traversal behavior by DOM or tabindex order; changing that order can change the traversal. This is a literal computational subtype, not an analogy or solution-trigger reversal."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Attempted a complete precoordinated-heading instance whose canonical composite representation is insensitive to dimension order; the fixed positional grammar and whole-string match exclude it.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Precoordinated Heading", "one_liner": "Fuse topic, place, period, and form into one canonical subject string at indexing time so users retrieve by matching a whole browsable label, trading expressiveness and easy schema evolution for that browsability.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:precoordinated_heading", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "precoordinated_heading"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "precoordinated_heading", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P005-C02-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires multiple descriptive dimensions, a position-sensitive compositional grammar, and a downstream canonical string used as an index key. Reordering the dimensions changes or invalidates that derived representation, so one complete non-disjunctive branch is directly entailed."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Downstream hashes, diffs, signatures, indexes, replays, or ordered representations depend on item order.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A canonical representation is the missing remedy and does not entail absence of an authoritative order.", "slug": "canonical_form"}], "residual_id": "r:canonical_ordering:b009_a05_c3", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_AMBIGUITY", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b009_a05_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The process has several plausible orders but no authoritative rule for choosing among them. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The process has several plausible orders but no authoritative rule for choosing among them."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A canonical representation is the missing remedy and does not entail absence of an authoritative order.", "slug": "canonical_form"}], "normalized_requirement": "Several plausible orders exist but no authoritative choice rule does.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_AMBIGUITY", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Several plausible orders exist but no authoritative choice rule does.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A normal form need not order otherwise incomparable items.", "slug": "canonical_form"}], "residual_id": "r:canonical_ordering:b009_a05_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b009_a05_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Equal, ambiguous, or incomparable items must still be displayed, processed, or selected in some order. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Equal, ambiguous, or incomparable items must still be displayed, processed, or selected in some order."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A normal form need not order otherwise incomparable items.", "slug": "canonical_form"}], "normalized_requirement": "Equal, ambiguous, or incomparable items must still be processed or displayed sequentially.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Equal, ambiguous, or incomparable items must still be processed or displayed sequentially.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Duplicating data for read performance does not require consequential item reordering.", "slug": "denormalization"}], "residual_id": "r:canonical_ordering:b009_a05_c5", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b009_a05_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Reordering carries social, legal, operational, or computational meaning. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Reordering carries social, legal, operational, or computational meaning."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Duplicating data for read performance does not require consequential item reordering.", "slug": "denormalization"}], "normalized_requirement": "Changing order carries social, legal, operational, or computational consequences.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Changing order carries social, legal, operational, or computational consequences.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Two or more actors, tools, departments, or runs must compare the same items.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The same items appear in different orders across people, tools, runs, reports, or versions. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: Two or more actors, tools, departments, or runs must compare the same items. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Two or more actors, tools, departments, or runs must compare the same items.", "The same items appear in different orders across people, tools, runs, reports, or versions."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "Two or more actors, tools, departments, or runs must compare the same items."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 9, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-009", "ledger_sha256": "980e3ef99b36dfb5278a681e2b3f6f60e5515ebd167f0101ce54743d45ecdc82"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Capacity Reservation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:capacity_reservation", "slug": "capacity_reservation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 5, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is crowd-out under scarcity. A shared capacity pool is available to many demands. Present demands consume it because they are visible, measurable, or politically salient. Later, a critical event, surge, interruption, obligation, or strategic opportunity appears, but capacity cannot be created quickly enough.\n\nThis creates false efficiency. A fully booked clinic, fully committed budget, fully utilized compute cluster, fully assigned team, or fully optimized supply chain can look productive while losing readiness. The missing fact is that some capacity has its highest value when it remains available.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A finite resource pool is available to many demands, but current visible demand can consume all capacity before critical, uncertain, or future needs appear, leaving the system unable to respond when those needs become real."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Held headroom does not require critical demand to arrive after ordinary demand.", "slug": "margin_of_safety"}], "residual_id": "r:capacity_reservation:b009_a06_c1", "residual_kind": "CONTINGENT_FACT", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b009_a06_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Later, a critical event, surge, interruption, obligation, or strategic opportunity appears, but capacity cannot be created quickly enough. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Critical demand arrives later than ordinary demand.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Critical demand arrives later than ordinary demand.", "Later, a critical event, surge, interruption, obligation, or strategic opportunity appears, but capacity cannot be created quickly enough."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Held headroom does not require critical demand to arrive after ordinary demand.", "slug": "margin_of_safety"}], "normalized_requirement": "Critical demand arrives later than ordinary demand.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "CONTINGENT_FACT", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Critical demand arrives later than ordinary demand.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Ability to reconfigure does not require that new capacity arrives too slowly.", "slug": "adaptive_capacity"}], "residual_id": "r:capacity_reservation:b009_a06_c2", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b009_a06_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Capacity cannot be created quickly enough once need is visible. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Capacity cannot be created quickly enough once need is visible."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Ability to reconfigure does not require that new capacity arrives too slowly.", "slug": "adaptive_capacity"}], "normalized_requirement": "Capacity cannot be created within the interval between visible need and required service.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Capacity cannot be created within the interval between visible need and required service.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Representing a future commitment does not require absent beneficiaries or capacity allocation.", "slug": "future_or_promise"}], "residual_id": "r:capacity_reservation:b009_a06_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b009_a06_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The beneficiaries of future capacity are not present to defend it. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The beneficiaries of future capacity are not present to defend it."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Representing a future commitment does not require absent beneficiaries or capacity allocation.", "slug": "future_or_promise"}], "normalized_requirement": "Future capacity beneficiaries are absent from current allocation decisions.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Future capacity beneficiaries are absent from current allocation decisions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A maintained safety margin is the protective state, not high utilization that removes readiness.", "slug": "margin_of_safety"}], "residual_id": "r:capacity_reservation:b009_a06_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b009_a06_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: High utilization looks efficient but reduces readiness. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["High utilization looks efficient but reduces readiness."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A maintained safety margin is the protective state, not high utilization that removes readiness.", "slug": "margin_of_safety"}], "normalized_requirement": "High ordinary utilization reduces readiness for critical demand.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "High ordinary utilization reduces readiness for critical demand.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A protected store need not leak into ordinary consumption.", "slug": "reserve"}], "residual_id": "r:capacity_reservation:b009_a06_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b009_a06_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Past reserves leak into ordinary use. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Past reserves leak into ordinary use."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A protected store need not leak into ordinary consumption.", "slug": "reserve"}], "normalized_requirement": "Previously reserved capacity leaks into ordinary use.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Previously reserved capacity leaks into ordinary use.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Risk, demand, or replenishment time changes over time.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Risk, demand, or replenishment time changes over time. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Risk, demand, or replenishment time changes over time."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Risk, demand, or replenishment time changes over time."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 9, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-009", "ledger_sha256": "980e3ef99b36dfb5278a681e2b3f6f60e5515ebd167f0101ce54743d45ecdc82"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Capture-Latency Evidence Stratification", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:capture_latency_evidence_stratification", "slug": "capture_latency_evidence_stratification"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 6, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 6, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "6 of 7 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 7}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "An event, state, decision, interaction, measurement, or experience is recorded after a delay. During the delay, memory fades, context shifts, incentives change, narratives form, missing details are filled in, and later knowledge contaminates what people think was originally observed. If the resulting backfilled record is presented as uniform evidence, downstream users cannot distinguish direct observation from reconstruction, inference, correction, normalization, or silence.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "An event, state, decision, interaction, measurement, or experience is recorded after a delay. During the delay, memory fades, context shifts, incentives change, narratives form, missing details are filled in, and later knowledge contaminates what people think was originally observed. If the resulting backfilled record is presented as uniform evidence, downstream users cannot distinguish direct observation from reconstruction, inference, correction, normalization, or silence."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a source event, mediated capture, and a delay interval that reduces fidelity.", "role_mapping": "Source event -> occurrence; delay interval -> capture latency; consumer -> decision use.", "slug": "evidence_fidelity_decay", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b009_a07_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: There is a material gap between event occurrence, first observation, first capture, later supplementation, and decision use. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["There is a material gap between event occurrence, first observation, first capture, later supplementation, and decision use."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Evidence-Fidelity Decay", "one_liner": "Delay between event and capture lets backfill silently fuse observation, inference, and reconstruction into one uniform record.", "page_ref": "prime:evidence_fidelity_decay", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source event -> occurrence; delay interval -> capture latency; consumer -> decision use.", "slug": "evidence_fidelity_decay", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a source event, mediated capture, and a delay interval that reduces fidelity."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A material delay separates event occurrence from first capture and later decision use.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires later evidence to enter a representation claimed to be valid for an earlier time.", "role_mapping": "Later evidence -> supplementation; earlier-time artifact -> authoritative event record.", "slug": "past_state_contamination", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b009_a07_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: People, systems, or institutions add evidence after the fact to a record that will be treated as authoritative. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["People, systems, or institutions add evidence after the fact to a record that will be treated as authoritative."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Past-State Contamination", "one_liner": "Later information enters a reconstruction, estimate, or evaluation presented as valid for an earlier time, erasing the boundary between what was knowable then and what became available only afterward.", "page_ref": "prime:past_state_contamination", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Later evidence -> supplementation; earlier-time artifact -> authoritative event record.", "slug": "past_state_contamination", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires later evidence to enter a representation claimed to be valid for an earlier time."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "After-the-fact evidence is added to a record treated as authoritative for the earlier event.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires delay-sensitive loss of detail followed by schema-driven reconstruction in one uniform register.", "role_mapping": "Lost detail -> incomplete original record; uniform reconstruction -> later summary overwrite.", "slug": "evidence_fidelity_decay", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b009_a07_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Useful records often need late correction and reconstruction, but evidentiary integrity requires preserving the difference between what was captured when the event was live and what was added later under changed knowledge, incentives, and memory. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The original record is incomplete, noisy, absent, ambiguous, or overwritten by later summary.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The original record is incomplete, noisy, absent, ambiguous, or overwritten by later summary.", "Useful records often need late correction and reconstruction, but evidentiary integrity requires preserving the difference between what was captured when the event was live and what was added later under changed knowledge, incentives, and memory."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Evidence-Fidelity Decay", "one_liner": "Delay between event and capture lets backfill silently fuse observation, inference, and reconstruction into one uniform record.", "page_ref": "prime:evidence_fidelity_decay", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Lost detail -> incomplete original record; uniform reconstruction -> later summary overwrite.", "slug": "evidence_fidelity_decay", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires delay-sensitive loss of detail followed by schema-driven reconstruction in one uniform register."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The original record is incomplete, noisy, absent, ambiguous, or overwritten by later summary.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires hidden fusion of observation, inference, and reconstruction to cause downstream mis-weighting.", "role_mapping": "Evidentiary stratum -> claim type; consumer weighting -> decision dependence.", "slug": "evidence_fidelity_decay", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b009_a07_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Downstream decisions depend on whether a claim was directly observed, reported, inferred, reconstructed, or corrected. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Downstream decisions depend on whether a claim was directly observed, reported, inferred, reconstructed, or corrected."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Evidence-Fidelity Decay", "one_liner": "Delay between event and capture lets backfill silently fuse observation, inference, and reconstruction into one uniform record.", "page_ref": "prime:evidence_fidelity_decay", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Evidentiary stratum -> claim type; consumer weighting -> decision dependence.", "slug": "evidence_fidelity_decay", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires hidden fusion of observation, inference, and reconstruction to cause downstream mis-weighting."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Decision weight should differ depending on whether a claim was observed, reported, inferred, reconstructed, or corrected.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Delayed reconstruction does not require absence to be interpreted as nonoccurrence.", "slug": "evidence_fidelity_decay"}], "residual_id": "r:capture_latency_evidence_stratification:b009_a07_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b009_a07_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Missing or silent evidence could be misread as proof that nothing happened. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Missing or silent evidence could be misread as proof that nothing happened."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Delayed reconstruction does not require absence to be interpreted as nonoccurrence.", "slug": "evidence_fidelity_decay"}], "normalized_requirement": "Missing or silent evidence may be interpreted as proof that no event occurred.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Missing or silent evidence may be interpreted as proof that no event occurred.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires reconstruction of an earlier state using information available only later.", "role_mapping": "Earlier state -> event record; later reconstruction -> after-event artifact.", "slug": "past_state_contamination", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime requires mediated capture after a delay with reconstruction from decayed memory.", "role_mapping": "Delayed recorder -> reconstruction process.", "slug": "evidence_fidelity_decay", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b009_a07_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A timeline, case note, audit record, research artifact, or incident report is being reconstructed after the event. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A timeline, case note, audit record, research artifact, or incident report is being reconstructed after the event."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Past-State Contamination", "one_liner": "Later information enters a reconstruction, estimate, or evaluation presented as valid for an earlier time, erasing the boundary between what was knowable then and what became available only afterward.", "page_ref": "prime:past_state_contamination", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Earlier state -> event record; later reconstruction -> after-event artifact.", "slug": "past_state_contamination", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires reconstruction of an earlier state using information available only later."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Evidence-Fidelity Decay", "one_liner": "Delay between event and capture lets backfill silently fuse observation, inference, and reconstruction into one uniform record.", "page_ref": "prime:evidence_fidelity_decay", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Delayed recorder -> reconstruction process.", "slug": "evidence_fidelity_decay", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires mediated capture after a delay with reconstruction from decayed memory."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A timeline, case, audit, research, or incident record is reconstructed after the event.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires memory decay and expectation-driven backfill to reshape the delayed record.", "role_mapping": "Memory pressure -> fidelity loss; backfill -> record reshaping.", "slug": "evidence_fidelity_decay", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b009_a07_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Memory, incentives, litigation, reputation, or organizational learning pressures can reshape the record after the event. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Memory, incentives, litigation, reputation, or organizational learning pressures can reshape the record after the event."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Evidence-Fidelity Decay", "one_liner": "Delay between event and capture lets backfill silently fuse observation, inference, and reconstruction into one uniform record.", "page_ref": "prime:evidence_fidelity_decay", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Memory pressure -> fidelity loss; backfill -> record reshaping.", "slug": "evidence_fidelity_decay", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires memory decay and expectation-driven backfill to reshape the delayed record."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Memory or institutional pressures can reshape the record after the event.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 9, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-009", "ledger_sha256": "980e3ef99b36dfb5278a681e2b3f6f60e5515ebd167f0101ce54743d45ecdc82"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Capture-Resistant Institutional Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:capture_resistant_institutional_design", "slug": "capture_resistant_institutional_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 7 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 7}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A regulator, standards body, platform governance council, grantmaker, auditor, procurement office, professional board, or oversight institution is meant to constrain or evaluate a powerful actor class, yet it relies on that same actor class for information, expertise, access, funding, implementation cooperation, career pathways, or legitimacy. The regulated group gains enough influence to bend the institution’s agenda, evidence base, enforcement thresholds, rule interpretation, or culture away from its mandate and toward the regulated group’s interests.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A regulator, standards body, platform governance council, grantmaker, auditor, procurement office, professional board, or oversight institution is meant to constrain or evaluate a powerful actor class, yet it relies on that same actor class for information, expertise, access, funding, implementation cooperation, career pathways, or legitimacy. The regulated group gains enough influence to bend the institution’s agenda, evidence base, enforcement thresholds, rule interpretation, or culture away from its mandate and toward the regulated group’s interests."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a regulator with a standing public mandate over regulated entities.", "role_mapping": "Regulator -> institution; regulated entities -> concentrated governed group.", "slug": "regulatory_capture", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b009_a08_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The institution repeatedly governs, supervises, accredits, licenses, audits, funds, or sets standards for a concentrated actor group. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The institution repeatedly governs, supervises, accredits, licenses, audits, funds, or sets standards for a concentrated actor group."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Regulatory Capture", "one_liner": "Regulated agents gain influence over institution redirecting it.", "page_ref": "prime:regulatory_capture", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Regulator -> institution; regulated entities -> concentrated governed group.", "slug": "regulatory_capture", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a regulator with a standing public mandate over regulated entities."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "An institution repeatedly regulates, audits, funds, licenses, accredits, or sets standards for a concentrated actor group.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires regulated actors to hold superior information or resources used to influence the institution.", "role_mapping": "Resource asymmetry -> scarce expertise, data, or capacity.", "slug": "regulatory_capture", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b009_a08_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The governed actors possess scarce expertise, data, infrastructure, implementation capacity, or political resources that the institution needs. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The governed actors possess scarce expertise, data, infrastructure, implementation capacity, or political resources that the institution needs."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Regulatory Capture", "one_liner": "Regulated agents gain influence over institution redirecting it.", "page_ref": "prime:regulatory_capture", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Resource asymmetry -> scarce expertise, data, or capacity.", "slug": "regulatory_capture", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires regulated actors to hold superior information or resources used to influence the institution."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Governed actors possess scarce information, expertise, infrastructure, implementation capacity, or political resources needed by the institution.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P005-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must type the high-access party as a governed or regulated actor class.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The advantaged source role is an actor subject to the institution's governance or regulation.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must compare regulated actors against affected constituencies, not another regulated firm.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The disadvantaged comparator role is a public or stakeholder affected by the institution's decisions.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern access to decision-making actors, not generic access to information.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The common destination role is an institutional decision maker.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail early regulated-actor access rather than access only after decisions are fixed.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Governed actors obtain access early in the decision process.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail denser or more frequent access for governed actors than for the comparator class.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Governed actors obtain access frequently relative to affected stakeholders.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail a timing disadvantage for affected stakeholders relative to governed actors.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "A complete branch is that affected stakeholders obtain access later than governed actors.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail absence of affected-stakeholder access while governed-actor access remains present.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "A complete branch is that affected stakeholders obtain no access to the decision makers.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Governed actors receive frequent, early access to decision makers while affected stakeholders receive access late or not at all.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Governed actors have earlier and denser decision-maker access than affected stakeholders.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P005-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Capture can operate through funding or staffing without this comparative meeting-access pattern.", "slug": "regulatory_capture"}, {"falls_short_because": "Sustained proximity erodes a role's frame but does not compare access against excluded publics.", "slug": "proximity_capture"}], "residual_id": "r:capture_resistant_institutional_design:b009_a08_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b009_a08_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Access to decision makers is asymmetric: regulated actors meet frequently and early while affected publics, competitors, workers, users, patients, communities, or future stakeholders appear late or not at all. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Access to decision makers is asymmetric: regulated actors meet frequently and early while affected publics, competitors, workers, users, patients, communities, or future stakeholders appear late or not at all."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Capture can operate through funding or staffing without this comparative meeting-access pattern.", "slug": "regulatory_capture"}, {"falls_short_because": "Sustained proximity erodes a role's frame but does not compare access against excluded publics.", "slug": "proximity_capture"}], "normalized_requirement": "Governed actors receive earlier and more frequent access than affected publics or future stakeholders.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Governed actors receive earlier and more frequent access than affected publics or future stakeholders.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Revolving-door staffing and institutional colonization are mandatory capture channels in the prime's signature.", "role_mapping": "Personnel flow -> revolving door; shared identity -> influence channel.", "slug": "regulatory_capture", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b009_a08_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Personnel move between the institution and the governed sector, creating career incentives, social ties, or shared identity. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Personnel move between the institution and the governed sector, creating career incentives, social ties, or shared identity."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Regulatory Capture", "one_liner": "Regulated agents gain influence over institution redirecting it.", "page_ref": "prime:regulatory_capture", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Personnel flow -> revolving door; shared identity -> influence channel.", "slug": "regulatory_capture", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Revolving-door staffing and institutional colonization are mandatory capture channels in the prime's signature."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Personnel move between the institution and governed sector, creating career incentives, ties, or shared identity.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Resource dependence on regulated entities supplies the asymmetry used to redirect the mandate.", "role_mapping": "Institutional dependence -> resource asymmetry; cooperation source -> regulated actors.", "slug": "regulatory_capture", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b009_a08_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The institution’s funding, reputation, information pipeline, or operational success depends on cooperation from the actors it is supposed to constrain. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The institution’s funding, reputation, information pipeline, or operational success depends on cooperation from the actors it is supposed to constrain."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Regulatory Capture", "one_liner": "Regulated agents gain influence over institution redirecting it.", "page_ref": "prime:regulatory_capture", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Institutional dependence -> resource asymmetry; cooperation source -> regulated actors.", "slug": "regulatory_capture", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Resource dependence on regulated entities supplies the asymmetry used to redirect the mandate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Institutional funding, reputation, information, or operational success depends on cooperation from actors it must constrain.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P005-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern an interpretively open technical rule rather than a fully mechanical rule.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The influenced object is a rule whose application requires technical discretion, judgment, or tradeoff.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must combine relevant expertise with a stake in the interpretive outcome.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The influencing actors are experts with an interest in how the rule is framed.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve influence from experts toward rule interpretation, not the reverse direction.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The interested experts can reframe the meaning or application of the rule.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail a live reframing capability or opportunity without strengthening it to completed capture.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Reframing is possible because the rule requires judgment; actual successful reframing is not required.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "Rules involving discretion, technical judgment, or risk tradeoffs can be reframed by interested experts.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Interested experts can redirect the interpretation of technically discretionary rules.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P005-C04-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Capture can redirect enforcement through staffing or funding even where rules leave little technical discretion.", "slug": "regulatory_capture"}], "residual_id": "r:capture_resistant_institutional_design:b009_a08_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b009_a08_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Rules require discretion, technical judgment, or risk tradeoffs that can be reframed by interested experts. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Rules require discretion, technical judgment, or risk tradeoffs that can be reframed by interested experts."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Capture can redirect enforcement through staffing or funding even where rules leave little technical discretion.", "slug": "regulatory_capture"}], "normalized_requirement": "Discretionary technical rules can be reframed by interested experts.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Discretionary technical rules can be reframed by interested experts.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A captured institution need not yet have produced any listed visible warning event.", "slug": "regulatory_capture"}], "residual_id": "r:capture_resistant_institutional_design:b009_a08_c7", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b009_a08_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A prior scandal, audit, enforcement drop-off, policy reversal, or stakeholder complaint suggests mandate drift or selective responsiveness. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A prior scandal, audit, enforcement drop-off, policy reversal, or stakeholder complaint suggests mandate drift or selective responsiveness."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A captured institution need not yet have produced any listed visible warning event.", "slug": "regulatory_capture"}], "normalized_requirement": "A scandal, audit, enforcement decline, reversal, or complaint supplies evidence of mandate drift or selective responsiveness.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A scandal, audit, enforcement decline, reversal, or complaint supplies evidence of mandate drift or selective responsiveness.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 9, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-009", "ledger_sha256": "980e3ef99b36dfb5278a681e2b3f6f60e5515ebd167f0101ce54743d45ecdc82"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Carrier-Independent Work Identity Governance", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:carrier_independent_work_identity_governance", "slug": "carrier_independent_work_identity_governance"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 7 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 7}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A content identity is used across multiple concrete carriers, formats, versions, copies, editions, performances, translations, implementations, or repositories, but the system lacks a clear criterion for sameness. Actors then conflate the work with one carrier, treat materially different instances as interchangeable, split harmless variations into unnecessary new works, or silently replace a work while still borrowing its authority, rights, citations, lineage, or trust.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A content identity is used across multiple concrete carriers, formats, versions, copies, editions, performances, translations, implementations, or repositories, but the system lacks a clear criterion for sameness. Actors then conflate the work with one carrier, treat materially different instances as interchangeable, split harmless variations into unnecessary new works, or silently replace a work while still borrowing its authority, rights, citations, lineage, or trust."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires one persisting content identity across two or more concrete carrier instances.", "role_mapping": "Work identity -> governed work; carriers -> formats, locations, or editions.", "slug": "abstract_work", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b009_a09_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A work must be recognized across multiple carriers, formats, locations, repositories, editions, or instantiations. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A work must be recognized across multiple carriers, formats, locations, repositories, editions, or instantiations."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Abstract Work", "one_liner": "A content identity that persists across its concrete carriers, with an explicit criterion for which instance-variations preserve the work and which fork a new one.", "page_ref": "prime:abstract_work", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Work identity -> governed work; carriers -> formats, locations, or editions.", "slug": "abstract_work", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires one persisting content identity across two or more concrete carrier instances."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A work must remain identifiable across multiple carriers, formats, locations, repositories, editions, or instances.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's separation invariant enables operations and queries over any version or rendition rather than one carrier.", "role_mapping": "Work-level operations -> cite, retrieve, license, perform, or govern.", "slug": "abstract_work", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b009_a09_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Users need to cite, retrieve, preserve, license, perform, implement, or govern the work rather than only a single instance. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Users need to cite, retrieve, preserve, license, perform, implement, or govern the work rather than only a single instance."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Abstract Work", "one_liner": "A content identity that persists across its concrete carriers, with an explicit criterion for which instance-variations preserve the work and which fork a new one.", "page_ref": "prime:abstract_work", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Work-level operations -> cite, retrieve, license, perform, or govern.", "slug": "abstract_work", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's separation invariant enables operations and queries over any version or rendition rather than one carrier."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Users act on the work-level identity rather than only one carrier instance.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires an identity criterion separating allowable instance variation from a new work or fork.", "role_mapping": "Instance variation -> manifestations; same/different partition -> identity decision.", "slug": "abstract_work", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b009_a09_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Copies, translations, adaptations, builds, versions, remediations, or performances differ in ways that may or may not preserve identity. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Copies, translations, adaptations, builds, versions, remediations, or performances differ in ways that may or may not preserve identity."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Abstract Work", "one_liner": "A content identity that persists across its concrete carriers, with an explicit criterion for which instance-variations preserve the work and which fork a new one.", "page_ref": "prime:abstract_work", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Instance variation -> manifestations; same/different partition -> identity decision.", "slug": "abstract_work", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires an identity criterion separating allowable instance variation from a new work or fork."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Copies, translations, adaptations, versions, builds, or performances vary while possibly preserving one work identity.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P005-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern identity of a work across manifestations, not continuity of one unchanged physical carrier.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The continuity-bearing entity is an abstract work identity expressed through concrete carriers or institutional records.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve threatened continuity or elevated risk, not require actual identity loss.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The transition creates a risk to continuity rather than proving that continuity has already failed.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail continuity risk caused by transfer between responsible institutions.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A complete branch is that an institutional handoff threatens work-identity continuity.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail continuity risk caused by moving the work between systems or carriers.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A complete branch is that migration threatens work-identity continuity.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail identity-continuity risk during preservation into an archival context.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "A complete branch is that archival preservation activity threatens work-identity continuity.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail continuity risk caused by changing the platform carrying or resolving the work.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "A complete branch is that platform change threatens work-identity continuity.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail continuity risk caused by changing publication context or form.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "A complete branch is that publication change threatens work-identity continuity.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "An institutional, carrier, or publication transition threatens continuity of a work's identity.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A transition between institutional or carrier contexts creates risk that work-level identity will not remain continuous.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P005-C05-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A work identity can persist across carriers without an imminent continuity threat.", "slug": "abstract_work"}], "residual_id": "r:carrier_independent_work_identity_governance:b009_a09_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b009_a09_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Institutional handoff, migration, archival preservation, platform change, or publication change threatens continuity. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Institutional handoff, migration, archival preservation, platform change, or publication change threatens continuity."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A work identity can persist across carriers without an imminent continuity threat.", "slug": "abstract_work"}], "normalized_requirement": "Institutional handoff, migration, archival, platform, or publication change threatens continuity.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Institutional handoff, migration, archival, platform, or publication change threatens continuity.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires lineage rules that distinguish same-work updates from forks.", "role_mapping": "Lineage update/fork -> successor identity inheritance; attribution -> attached authority.", "slug": "abstract_work", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b009_a09_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A successor, fork, derivative, or edition might inherit or lose the identity, authority, rights, obligations, or trust attached to the original work. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A successor, fork, derivative, or edition might inherit or lose the identity, authority, rights, obligations, or trust attached to the original work."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Abstract Work", "one_liner": "A content identity that persists across its concrete carriers, with an explicit criterion for which instance-variations preserve the work and which fork a new one.", "page_ref": "prime:abstract_work", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Lineage update/fork -> successor identity inheritance; attribution -> attached authority.", "slug": "abstract_work", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires lineage rules that distinguish same-work updates from forks."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A successor, fork, derivative, or edition may inherit or lose identity and attached authority, rights, obligations, or trust.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P005-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require multiple stakeholder judgments, not one person's uncertainty.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "At least two stakeholders take positions on the work identity of the manifestation.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern the same altered carrier or version across all stakeholder judgments.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The common classified object is one changed concrete manifestation of a work.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern identity relations among works and manifestations, not generic category disagreement.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The possible classification outcomes are work-level identity statuses such as same work, variant, derivative, or new work.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail differing classifications; shared uncertainty without different positions is insufficient.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Stakeholders assign at least two different work-identity statuses to the manifestation.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve actual disagreement rather than resolved or convergent work identity.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The stakeholder classifications do not agree.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Stakeholders disagree whether a changed manifestation is the same work, a variant, a derivative, or a new work.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Stakeholders assign conflicting work-identity statuses to the same changed manifestation.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P005-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An explicit identity criterion can resolve variation without stakeholder disagreement.", "slug": "abstract_work"}], "residual_id": "r:carrier_independent_work_identity_governance:b009_a09_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b009_a09_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Stakeholders disagree about whether a changed manifestation is the same work, a variant, a derivative, or a new work. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders disagree about whether a changed manifestation is the same work, a variant, a derivative, or a new work."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An explicit identity criterion can resolve variation without stakeholder disagreement.", "slug": "abstract_work"}], "normalized_requirement": "Stakeholders disagree whether a changed manifestation is the same work, variant, derivative, or new work.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Stakeholders disagree whether a changed manifestation is the same work, variant, derivative, or new work.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P005-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must apply to a mechanism used to identify or resolve represented content.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The source role is a reference or descriptive mechanism such as an identifier, metadata record, citation, or source-of-truth record.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail carrier-level resolution rather than total failure to identify anything.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The successful resolution destination is a concrete carrier or manifestation of a work.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the direction from identifier or record toward a carrier instance.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The reference mechanism resolves to the concrete carrier.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern work-level identity semantics, not arbitrary missing carrier metadata.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The omitted object is the criterion for sameness and difference at the abstract-work level.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail that carrier resolution coexists with omission of abstract-work identity criteria.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The reference mechanism does not encode the work-level identity criterion.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Identifiers, metadata, citations, or source-of-truth records resolve to carriers but do not encode the work-level identity criterion.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Reference mechanisms identify concrete carriers while omitting the criterion that unifies or distinguishes the abstract work.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P005-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete abstract-work representation includes an identity criterion and need not suffer carrier-only identifiers.", "slug": "abstract_work"}], "residual_id": "r:carrier_independent_work_identity_governance:b009_a09_c7", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b009_a09_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Identifiers, metadata, citations, or source-of-truth records resolve to carriers but do not encode the work-level identity criterion. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Identifiers, metadata, citations, or source-of-truth records resolve to carriers but do not encode the work-level identity criterion."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete abstract-work representation includes an identity criterion and need not suffer carrier-only identifiers.", "slug": "abstract_work"}], "normalized_requirement": "Identifiers and metadata resolve to carriers but omit the work-level identity criterion.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Identifiers and metadata resolve to carriers but omit the work-level identity criterion.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 9, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-009", "ledger_sha256": "980e3ef99b36dfb5278a681e2b3f6f60e5515ebd167f0101ce54743d45ecdc82"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Cascade Initiation Bias Diagnosis and Correction", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:cascade_initiation_bias_diagnosis_and_correction", "slug": "cascade_initiation_bias_diagnosis_and_correction"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 5, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 7 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 7}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A sequence of visible decisions or repeated claims has become self-reinforcing because actors treat prior actions as evidence. The apparent weight of the cascade may be much larger than the independent evidence behind it, especially when the first movers or threshold actors are assumed to possess private information that they may not actually possess.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A sequence of visible decisions or repeated claims has become self-reinforcing because actors treat prior actions as evidence. The apparent weight of the cascade may be much larger than the independent evidence behind it, especially when the first movers or threshold actors are assumed to possess private information that they may not actually possess."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires sequential observation of public predecessor choices.", "role_mapping": "Earlier visible choices -> observed actions; later actor -> follower.", "slug": "information_cascade", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b009_a10_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Actors decide sequentially and can observe earlier choices, exits, endorsements, purchases, votes, ratings, or claims. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Actors decide sequentially and can observe earlier choices, exits, endorsements, purchases, votes, ratings, or claims."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Information Cascade", "one_liner": "The sequential dynamic in which actors copy earlier actors' visible choices and suppress their own private signals, driving collective convergence that can be confidently wrong.", "page_ref": "prime:information_cascade", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Earlier visible choices -> observed actions; later actor -> follower.", "slug": "information_cascade", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires sequential observation of public predecessor choices."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Actors decide sequentially while observing predecessors' choices or endorsements.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires rational copying of predecessors and suppression of private signals.", "role_mapping": "Public choice -> cited uptake; private signal -> independent evidence.", "slug": "information_cascade", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b009_a10_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Later actors cite prior actors or overall uptake as a reason for action rather than naming independent evidence. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Later actors cite prior actors or overall uptake as a reason for action rather than naming independent evidence."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Information Cascade", "one_liner": "The sequential dynamic in which actors copy earlier actors' visible choices and suppress their own private signals, driving collective convergence that can be confidently wrong.", "page_ref": "prime:information_cascade", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Public choice -> cited uptake; private signal -> independent evidence.", "slug": "information_cascade", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires rational copying of predecessors and suppression of private signals."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Later actors cite prior uptake rather than independent evidence as the reason to act.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Followers infer information from early public choices and let that inference dominate their own signal.", "role_mapping": "Predecessor choice -> perceived information; follower inference -> better-positioned attribution.", "slug": "information_cascade", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b009_a10_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The first movers, threshold actors, or visible adopters are perceived as expert, well informed, high status, close to the source, or better positioned. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The first movers, threshold actors, or visible adopters are perceived as expert, well informed, high status, close to the source, or better positioned."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Information Cascade", "one_liner": "The sequential dynamic in which actors copy earlier actors' visible choices and suppress their own private signals, driving collective convergence that can be confidently wrong.", "page_ref": "prime:information_cascade", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Predecessor choice -> perceived information; follower inference -> better-positioned attribution.", "slug": "information_cascade", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Followers infer information from early public choices and let that inference dominate their own signal."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Early or visible adopters are treated as better informed or positioned.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires private signals to remain visible only to individuals while public choices are observable.", "role_mapping": "Private evidence -> opaque reason; public action -> visible choice.", "slug": "information_cascade", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b009_a10_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Private signals, primary sources, due-diligence records, or reasons for early action are opaque to later actors. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Private signals, primary sources, due-diligence records, or reasons for early action are opaque to later actors."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Information Cascade", "one_liner": "The sequential dynamic in which actors copy earlier actors' visible choices and suppress their own private signals, driving collective convergence that can be confidently wrong.", "page_ref": "prime:information_cascade", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Private evidence -> opaque reason; public action -> visible choice.", "slug": "information_cascade", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires private signals to remain visible only to individuals while public choices are observable."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Private signals and reasons for early action are opaque to later actors.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires early choices to lock in collective convergence that can be confidently wrong.", "role_mapping": "Early sequence -> cascade initiators; collective convergence -> confidence or uptake shift.", "slug": "information_cascade", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b009_a10_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A small early sequence produces a disproportionate shift in confidence, price, adoption, reputation, or policy support. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A small early sequence produces a disproportionate shift in confidence, price, adoption, reputation, or policy support."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Information Cascade", "one_liner": "The sequential dynamic in which actors copy earlier actors' visible choices and suppress their own private signals, driving collective convergence that can be confidently wrong.", "page_ref": "prime:information_cascade", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Early sequence -> cascade initiators; collective convergence -> confidence or uptake shift.", "slug": "information_cascade", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires early choices to lock in collective convergence that can be confidently wrong."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A small early sequence produces a disproportionate shift in collective confidence or adoption.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime distinguishes rational inference from conformity pressure and does not require contrarian social cost.", "slug": "information_cascade"}], "residual_id": "r:cascade_initiation_bias_diagnosis_and_correction:b009_a10_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b009_a10_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Actors have incentives to avoid being visibly contrarian once a majority or prestigious subgroup appears to have formed. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Actors have incentives to avoid being visibly contrarian once a majority or prestigious subgroup appears to have formed."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime distinguishes rational inference from conformity pressure and does not require contrarian social cost.", "slug": "information_cascade"}], "normalized_requirement": "Actors face social or strategic incentives not to be visibly contrarian after a majority forms.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Actors face social or strategic incentives not to be visibly contrarian after a majority forms.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Private signals can remain recoverable and cheap to disclose even after a cascade forms.", "slug": "information_cascade"}], "residual_id": "r:cascade_initiation_bias_diagnosis_and_correction:b009_a10_c7", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b009_a10_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The cost of challenging the cascade rises as more actors join, making independent evidence harder to recover. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The cost of challenging the cascade rises as more actors join, making independent evidence harder to recover."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Private signals can remain recoverable and cheap to disclose even after a cascade forms.", "slug": "information_cascade"}], "normalized_requirement": "As uptake grows, challenging the cascade becomes costlier and independent evidence harder to recover.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "As uptake grows, challenging the cascade becomes costlier and independent evidence harder to recover.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Correction remains possible because decisions, communications, rankings, claims, or commitments can still be paused, qualified, or revisited.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A sequence of visible decisions or repeated claims has become self-reinforcing because actors treat prior actions as evidence. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: Correction remains possible because decisions, communications, rankings, claims, or commitments can still be paused, qualified, or revisited. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Correction remains possible because decisions, communications, rankings, claims, or commitments can still be paused, qualified, or revisited.", "A sequence of visible decisions or repeated claims has become self-reinforcing because actors treat prior actions as evidence."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 8, "text": "Correction remains possible because decisions, communications, rankings, claims, or commitments can still be paused, qualified, or revisited."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 9, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-009", "ledger_sha256": "980e3ef99b36dfb5278a681e2b3f6f60e5515ebd167f0101ce54743d45ecdc82"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Cascade Pathway Management", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:cascade_pathway_management", "slug": "cascade_pathway_management"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system can be locally understandable and globally fragile when elements are connected through dependencies, thresholds, feedback, incentives, operational handoffs, or social signals. One node changes, then its neighbors change, then their neighbors change. By the time the visible damage appears, the original source may no longer be the best intervention point.\n\nThis archetype becomes relevant when people say “domino effect,” “chain reaction,” “cascading failure,” “knock-on effects,” or “ripple effects,” but no one owns the pathway model. The warning sign is not just that something bad happened; it is that each effect becomes a new cause.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system contains coupled elements whose state changes are not independent: a change in one element can trigger changes in others, which then trigger further changes. The cascade pathway is partially invisible, unowned, or uncontrolled, so local action can become systemic disruption, missed opportunity, or runaway adoption without deliberate governance."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a local trigger to initiate a chain of further state changes.", "role_mapping": "Local trigger -> initiating event; re-emission chain -> dependent changes.", "slug": "cascade", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b009_a11_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A local event, choice, failure, signal, price movement, ecological shift, or state transition can activate a sequence of dependent changes. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A local event, choice, failure, signal, price movement, ecological shift, or state transition\ncan activate a sequence of dependent changes."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Cascade", "one_liner": "A change in one element triggers a chain of further changes.", "page_ref": "prime:cascade", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Local trigger -> initiating event; re-emission chain -> dependent changes.", "slug": "cascade", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a local trigger to initiate a chain of further state changes."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A local event or state change can trigger a sequence of dependent changes.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires coupled transmission through thresholded elements that regenerate the disturbance.", "role_mapping": "Coupled neighbors -> dependencies; re-emission -> propagation relation.", "slug": "cascade", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b009_a11_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Elements are connected by technical dependencies, financial exposures, ecological relations, social influence, operational handoffs, or threshold-triggered rules. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Elements are connected by technical dependencies, financial exposures, ecological relations,\nsocial influence, operational handoffs, or threshold-triggered rules."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Cascade", "one_liner": "A change in one element triggers a chain of further changes.", "page_ref": "prime:cascade", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Coupled neighbors -> dependencies; re-emission -> propagation relation.", "slug": "cascade", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires coupled transmission through thresholded elements that regenerate the disturbance."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Elements are coupled by dependency, exposure, influence, handoff, or threshold rules that carry propagation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires propagation and containment response to traverse one graph, with failure when response is slower.", "role_mapping": "Propagation timescale -> chain speed; response timescale -> review or incident response.", "slug": "response_vs_propagation_race", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b009_a11_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Propagation can outrun ordinary review cycles, incident response, governance, or human sensemaking. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Propagation can outrun ordinary review cycles, incident response, governance, or human\nsensemaking."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Response-vs-Propagation Race", "one_liner": "Containment wins or loses by timescale comparison.", "page_ref": "prime:response_vs_propagation_race", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Propagation timescale -> chain speed; response timescale -> review or incident response.", "slug": "response_vs_propagation_race", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires propagation and containment response to traverse one graph, with failure when response is slower."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Propagation can outrun ordinary review, incident response, governance, or sensemaking.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P005-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must distinguish downstream observers from upstream pathway elements.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The observer role is an actor located downstream in a causal or propagation cascade.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must allow visible downstream manifestations rather than a wholly unobservable cascade.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The downstream actor observes symptoms or effects of the cascade.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern upstream propagation connections, not arbitrary unknown root-cause facts.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The unknown objects are upstream links capable of continuing the cascade.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve simultaneous ongoing upstream activity rather than only historical causes.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The upstream links at issue remain active when the downstream symptoms are observed.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail pathway-specific ignorance despite symptom visibility.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The downstream actor does not know which upstream links remain active.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail possibility of the configuration without requiring universal occurrence.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "This symptom-visible/pathway-unknown configuration can occur; it is not asserted for every cascade observation.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "Downstream actors can observe cascade symptoms while remaining unable to identify which upstream links are still active.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A cascade's downstream symptoms can be visible while its active upstream propagation links remain unknown.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P005-C08-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A propagation chain can be fully observable end to end.", "slug": "cascade"}], "residual_id": "r:cascade_pathway_management:b009_a11_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b009_a11_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Downstream actors may see symptoms without knowing which upstream links are still active. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Downstream actors may see symptoms without knowing which upstream links are still active."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A propagation chain can be fully observable end to end.", "slug": "cascade"}], "normalized_requirement": "Downstream actors observe symptoms without knowing which upstream links remain active.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Downstream actors observe symptoms without knowing which upstream links remain active.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Cascade structure is value-neutral and does not require both benefit and uncontrolled harm.", "slug": "cascade"}], "residual_id": "r:cascade_pathway_management:b009_a11_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b009_a11_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A desired beneficial cascade is possible, but uncontrolled reinforcement could create overshoot, backlash, resource exhaustion, or inequity. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A desired beneficial cascade is possible, but uncontrolled reinforcement could create overshoot,\nbacklash, resource exhaustion, or inequity."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Cascade structure is value-neutral and does not require both benefit and uncontrolled harm.", "slug": "cascade"}], "normalized_requirement": "A desired beneficial cascade is possible while uncontrolled reinforcement risks overshoot, backlash, exhaustion, or inequity.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A desired beneficial cascade is possible while uncontrolled reinforcement risks overshoot, backlash, exhaustion, or inequity.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P005-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern an already-present protective control rather than absence of all safeguards.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The control role is an existing safeguard for failures or decisions.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail local-event design scope, not merely deployment at one location.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The safeguard is designed to address an isolated event or single decision.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must distinguish a propagation chain from one isolated failure.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The omitted hazard role is a chain reaction in which effects propagate across linked events.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail missing chain-aware coverage rather than complete cascade protection.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The safeguard does not address the chain reaction as a chain.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the local-versus-cascading scope contrast.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Safeguard coverage favors isolated events over propagation-chain behavior.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Existing safeguards address isolated failures or single decisions rather than chain reactions.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Safeguards scoped to isolated events do not cover propagation through a chain reaction.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P005-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A cascading system can already have chain-aware safeguards.", "slug": "cascade"}], "residual_id": "r:cascade_pathway_management:b009_a11_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b009_a11_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Existing safeguards are designed for isolated failures or single decisions rather than chain reactions. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Existing safeguards are designed for isolated failures or single decisions rather than chain\nreactions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A cascading system can already have chain-aware safeguards.", "slug": "cascade"}], "normalized_requirement": "Existing safeguards address isolated events rather than chain reactions.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Existing safeguards address isolated events rather than chain reactions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 9, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-009", "ledger_sha256": "980e3ef99b36dfb5278a681e2b3f6f60e5515ebd167f0101ce54743d45ecdc82"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Cascaded Hierarchical Recognition", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:cascaded_hierarchical_recognition", "slug": "cascaded_hierarchical_recognition"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system, person, team, model, or interface must recognize patterns, objects, threats, documents, diagnoses, cases, or meanings from many possible candidates, but the relevant evidence is distributed across features of different cost, scale, and reliability. Treating all features as equally available overloads attention, wastes computation, increases false matches, and encourages premature closure. Treating the first salient cue as decisive creates false negatives and brittle recognition.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system, person, team, model, or interface must recognize patterns, objects, threats, documents, diagnoses, cases, or meanings from many possible candidates, but the relevant evidence is distributed across features of different cost, scale, and reliability. Treating all features as equally available overloads attention, wastes computation, increases false matches, and encourages premature closure. Treating the first salient cue as decisive creates false negatives and brittle recognition."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a population too expensive to send entirely through the authoritative check.", "role_mapping": "Item population -> candidate space; expensive check -> direct exhaustive recognition.", "slug": "asymmetric_screening", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b009_a12_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The candidate space is large enough that checking every possible class or feature directly is costly, slow, or cognitively overwhelming. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The candidate space is large enough that checking every possible class or feature directly is costly, slow, or cognitively overwhelming."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Asymmetric Screening", "one_liner": "A cheap, deliberately one-sided-error filter gates an expensive authoritative check.", "page_ref": "prime:asymmetric_screening", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Item population -> candidate space; expensive check -> direct exhaustive recognition.", "slug": "asymmetric_screening", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a population too expensive to send entirely through the authoritative check."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The candidate class or feature space is too large for direct exhaustive checking.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P005-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern evidence features in a recognition process, not arbitrary resource tiers.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Both compared classes consist of features used for recognition among candidate classes.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail distinct feature subsets rather than one uniform feature pool.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "At least some features occupy the broadly available early-feature class and others occupy the later-feature class.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require both low cost and broad initial discrimination for the same early-feature subset; either property alone is insufficient.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The early-feature subset is both cheap and broadly discriminative across the initial candidate set.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require both high cost and post-narrowing-only utility for the same distinct feature subset; either property alone is insufficient.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The other feature subset is both expensive and useful only after the candidate class has been narrowed.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must make post-narrowing timing mandatory for the later subset, not merely one optional use stage.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The expensive later-feature subset becomes useful only after the candidate class has been narrowed.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the complete cheap-and-broad early versus expensive-and-post-narrowing later contrast.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The early and later feature subsets differ jointly in cost, breadth of discrimination, and stage of utility.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Some recognition features are cheap and broadly discriminative, while other features are expensive and useful only after the candidate class has been narrowed.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Recognition features divide into an early subset that is both cheap and broadly discriminative and a later subset that is both expensive and useful only after narrowing.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P005-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A cheap filter and costly final test do not require individual features to have hierarchical utility.", "slug": "asymmetric_screening"}], "residual_id": "r:cascaded_hierarchical_recognition:b009_a12_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b009_a12_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Some features are cheap, salient, or broadly discriminative, while others are expensive, subtle, noisy, or only useful after a candidate class has been narrowed. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Some features are cheap, salient, or broadly discriminative, while others are expensive, subtle, noisy, or only useful after a candidate class has been narrowed."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A cheap filter and costly final test do not require individual features to have hierarchical utility.", "slug": "asymmetric_screening"}], "normalized_requirement": "Some features are cheap and broadly discriminative while others are expensive and useful only after narrowing.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Some features are cheap and broadly discriminative while others are expensive and useful only after narrowing.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a cheap first pass deliberately biased against the forbidden miss, followed by an expensive authoritative check.", "role_mapping": "Early one-sided filter -> high recall; authoritative check -> late precision.", "slug": "asymmetric_screening", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b009_a12_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Recognition quality depends on both high recall early and high precision later. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Recognition quality depends on both high recall early and high precision later."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Asymmetric Screening", "one_liner": "A cheap, deliberately one-sided-error filter gates an expensive authoritative check.", "page_ref": "prime:asymmetric_screening", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Early one-sided filter -> high recall; authoritative check -> late precision.", "slug": "asymmetric_screening", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a cheap first pass deliberately biased against the forbidden miss, followed by an expensive authoritative check."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Recognition requires high recall in an early screen and high precision in a later authoritative stage.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P005-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern a multi-granularity recognition process rather than generic review error.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The affected process recognizes or screens candidate cases using coarse and fine evidence.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve recurrence or characteristic frequency of the error pattern.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The recognition mistakes occur often rather than as one isolated anomaly.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail consequential recognition failure rather than harmless extra processing.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The resulting mistakes are important recognition errors.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail premature fine-grained review before appropriate narrowing.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A complete branch is that the system attends to fine detail too early in the recognition sequence.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must make early fine-detail focus causal for the error outcome.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "In the fine-first branch, premature fine-detail focus causes the recognition errors.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail coarse-stage rejection of low-frequency cases that matter.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "A complete branch is that a coarse screen excludes rare but important cases.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must make coarse exclusion causal for the important missed recognition.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "In the coarse-exclusion branch, that exclusion causes the recognition errors.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Important recognition errors often arise because review starts with fine detail too early or because a coarse screen excludes rare important cases.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Premature fine-detail review or overly coarse screening recurrently causes important recognition errors.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P005-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A correctly tuned cascade does not require prior fine-first or coarse-exclusion errors.", "slug": "asymmetric_screening"}], "residual_id": "r:cascaded_hierarchical_recognition:b009_a12_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b009_a12_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Mistakes often occur because a system focuses on fine detail too early or because a coarse screen excludes rare but important cases. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Mistakes often occur because a system focuses on fine detail too early or because a coarse screen excludes rare but important cases."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A correctly tuned cascade does not require prior fine-first or coarse-exclusion errors.", "slug": "asymmetric_screening"}], "normalized_requirement": "Fine-detail-first review or overly coarse screening causes important recognition errors.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Fine-detail-first review or overly coarse screening causes important recognition errors.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The domain has natural levels: page to region to character, symptom to syndrome to diagnosis, silhouette to object type to identity, incident signal to subsystem to root cause, or user query to category to answer.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: The domain has natural levels: page to region to character, symptom to syndrome to diagnosis, silhouette to object type to identity, incident signal to subsystem to root cause, or user query to category to answer. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The domain has natural levels: page to region to character, symptom to syndrome to diagnosis, silhouette to object type to identity, incident signal to subsystem to root cause, or user query to category to answer."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The domain has natural levels: page to region to character, symptom to syndrome to diagnosis, silhouette to object type to identity, incident signal to subsystem to root cause, or user query to category to answer."}, {"display_text": "Human operators, models, or organizations need a repeatable way to route attention rather than relying on ad hoc salience.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: Human operators, models, or organizations need a repeatable way to route attention rather than relying on ad hoc salience. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Human operators, models, or organizations need a repeatable way to route attention rather than relying on ad hoc salience."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Human operators, models, or organizations need a repeatable way to route attention rather than relying on ad hoc salience."}, {"display_text": "The recognition process must produce explainable intermediate states, not only a final label.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this deployment constraint: The recognition process must produce explainable intermediate states, not only a final label. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The recognition process must produce explainable intermediate states, not only a final label."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "The recognition process must produce explainable intermediate states, not only a final label."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 9, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-009", "ledger_sha256": "980e3ef99b36dfb5278a681e2b3f6f60e5515ebd167f0101ce54743d45ecdc82"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Catalytic Pairing", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:catalytic_pairing", "slug": "catalytic_pairing"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is suppressed potential. A focal factor exists, but the system around it does not let it express its intended effect. The missing piece may be a complementary resource, a timing condition, an access pathway, a feedback signal, an incentive, a cofactor, or a process change.\n\nThe common mistake is evaluating each factor in isolation. A team asks whether training works, whether feedback works, whether a new tool works, or whether an incentive works, but the real question is whether the right pair works under the right conditions.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A focal factor has potential value but produces weak, unreliable, slow, or short-lived effects when used alone. The system treats interventions, resources, or capabilities as separable units even though their real effect depends on interaction with another enabling factor."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A catalyst may perform as expected and is the proposed mechanism rather than evidence of underperformance.", "slug": "catalysis"}], "residual_id": "r:catalytic_pairing:b009_a13_c1", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b009_a13_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A proven or plausible factor underperforms in practice. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A proven or plausible factor underperforms in practice."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A catalyst may perform as expected and is the proposed mechanism rather than evidence of underperformance.", "slug": "catalysis"}], "normalized_requirement": "A proven or plausible factor underperforms in practice.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A proven or plausible factor underperforms in practice.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires comparing the combined effect with an explicit additive, multiplicative, or domain baseline and identifies synergy when it exceeds that baseline.", "role_mapping": "Components A and B -> interventions; supra-baseline effect -> stronger together.", "slug": "synergy_and_antagonism", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b009_a13_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Two interventions appear stronger together than apart. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Two interventions appear stronger together than apart."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Synergy and Antagonism", "one_liner": "Amplified or diminished effects.", "page_ref": "prime:synergy_and_antagonism", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Components A and B -> interventions; supra-baseline effect -> stronger together.", "slug": "synergy_and_antagonism", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires comparing the combined effect with an explicit additive, multiplicative, or domain baseline and identifies synergy when it exceeds that baseline."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Two interventions have a combined effect greater than the specified independent-effects baseline.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P005-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require a single-factor intervention rather than an arbitrary or multifactor change.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The initiating action is an intervention directed at only one factor.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve intervention-before-plateau ordering rather than a preexisting stall.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The stalled state occurs after the single-factor intervention.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail a plateau or failure of continued adoption progress.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A complete branch is that adoption of the focal capability or practice stalls.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail a plateau or failure of continued effect or impact.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A complete branch is that the intervention's impact stalls.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Adoption or impact stalls after a single-factor intervention.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Progress plateaus after an intervention changes only one factor.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P005-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A catalyst can accelerate a pathway without a prior single-factor intervention or adoption plateau.", "slug": "catalysis"}], "residual_id": "r:catalytic_pairing:b009_a13_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b009_a13_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use Catalytic Pairing when a single intervention, resource, tool, or capability has promise but is not producing enough effect on its own. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Adoption or impact stalls after a single-factor intervention.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Adoption or impact stalls after a single-factor intervention.", "Use Catalytic Pairing when a single intervention, resource, tool, or capability has promise but is not producing enough effect on its own."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "With the single-factor-pilot guard fixed, attempted a complete pilot-purgatory instance without intervention-before-stalled-adoption ordering; the completed demonstration loop and stable no-scale state exclude that witness.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Pilot Purgatory", "one_liner": "Relocate the diagnosis of an initiative that keeps running successful pilots without ever scaling from 'weak evidence' to 'a missing transition mechanism' — the loop is sustained by each pilot's local success, and the fault sits one level up in the decision infrastructure.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:pilot_purgatory", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "single_factor_pilot", "predicate": "The pilot intervention changes exactly one causal factor.", "rationale": "The retained expression preserves exact roles, relation direction, polarity, modality, quantifier, and one complete DNF branch; any qualifier is one anchored atomic fact and cannot leave the candidate-plus-qualifier true while the unit is false."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "pilot_purgatory"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "single_factor_pilot"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "pilot_purgatory", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P005-C12-U1", "why_it_fits": "Pilot purgatory requires a completed pilot intervention followed by stalled adoption at the pilot state. Restricting that already-present pilot intervention to exactly one causal factor is one atomic cardinality fact; it fills O1 while the exact record directly supplies the intervention-before-stall ordering and the adoption-stall branch."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Adoption or impact stalls after a single-factor intervention.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime requires an explicit baseline against which interaction is measured, not unclear interaction logic.", "slug": "synergy_and_antagonism"}], "residual_id": "r:catalytic_pairing:b009_a13_c6", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_AMBIGUITY", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b009_a13_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A bundle is proposed but its interaction logic is unclear. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A bundle is proposed but its interaction logic is unclear."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime requires an explicit baseline against which interaction is measured, not unclear interaction logic.", "slug": "synergy_and_antagonism"}], "normalized_requirement": "A proposed bundle lacks a clear interaction model.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_AMBIGUITY", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A proposed bundle lacks a clear interaction model.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Separate teams own complementary pieces of the same outcome.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The missing piece may be a complementary resource, a timing condition, an access pathway, a feedback signal, an incentive, a cofactor, or a process change. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Separate teams own complementary pieces of the same outcome. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Separate teams own complementary pieces of the same outcome.", "The missing piece may be a complementary resource, a timing condition, an access pathway, a feedback signal, an incentive, a cofactor, or a process change."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Separate teams own complementary pieces of the same outcome."}, {"display_text": "Early tests show nonlinear or threshold-like response.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Early tests show nonlinear or threshold-like response. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Early tests show nonlinear or threshold-like response."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Early tests show nonlinear or threshold-like response."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 9, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-009", "ledger_sha256": "980e3ef99b36dfb5278a681e2b3f6f60e5515ebd167f0101ce54743d45ecdc82"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Catalytic Pathway Enablement", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:catalytic_pathway_enablement", "slug": "catalytic_pathway_enablement"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 2 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 2}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A known input should become a known output, yet each case stalls before or during the same transition. The rate-limiting burden may be activation energy, search, interpretation, coordination, trust, handoff friction, recognition, setup, or access to a valid intermediate state. Because the barrier is paid repeatedly, aggregate throughput remains low even when demand, substrate, and desired outcomes are abundant.\n\nThe system may already have a promising facilitator—a molecule, enzyme, interface, shared service, template, automation, specialist, broker, or institution—but use it informally. Without an explicit interface and operating envelope, incompatible substrates enter the pathway, the facilitator becomes saturated, side-path outputs rise, maintenance is deferred, and the facilitator’s real activity falls while its nominal presence remains unchanged. The organization then adds more substrate or pressure, making the queue and degradation worse.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A recurring transformation between known initial and final states is technically, socially, procedurally, or institutionally possible, but ordinary cases move too slowly because each must repeatedly pay a high activation, search, trust, interpretation, coordination, interface, or setup cost. Adding more substrate or generic effort does not solve the rate problem and may increase queues, rework, or harmful side paths. A small reusable capability could lower the barrier on a specific pathway, but the system has not defined the facilitator, interface, turnover capacity, selectivity boundary, regeneration cycle, or safeguards needed to use that leverage reliably."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a thermodynamically favorable but stalled transformation separated by a barrier whose threshold input initiates progress.", "role_mapping": "Favorable endpoint -> feasible transformation; barrier -> repeatable pathway cost.", "slug": "activation_energy", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b009_a14_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The main delay is a repeatable barrier or pathway cost rather than missing bulk resources, an impossible endpoint, or an unresolved objective conflict. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The main delay is a repeatable barrier or pathway cost rather than missing bulk resources, an impossible endpoint, or an unresolved objective conflict."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Activation Energy", "one_liner": "The minimum input that must be supplied to push a thermodynamically favorable but stalled process past a barrier before momentum carries it to completion.", "page_ref": "prime:activation_energy", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Favorable endpoint -> feasible transformation; barrier -> repeatable pathway cost.", "slug": "activation_energy", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a thermodynamically favorable but stalled transformation separated by a barrier whose threshold input initiates progress."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A repeatable pathway barrier or activation cost, rather than an impossible endpoint, is the main delay.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P005-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern increasing pathway rate, not arbitrary growth or expansion.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The intervention role is acceleration of a recurring pathway or transformation.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail lack of selectivity in what is accelerated.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The acceleration is indiscriminate across relevant pathways, cases, outputs, or quality states.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail a real harm possibility without strengthening it to inevitable harm.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The branch-specific selectivity problem can make the acceleration harmful.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail harmful pathway competition under nonselective acceleration.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A complete branch is that competing routes cause indiscriminate acceleration to favor an unwanted pathway.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail acceleration of non-target cases as the harm route.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "A complete branch is that non-target cases cause indiscriminate acceleration to affect unwanted cases.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail harmful byproduct amplification under acceleration.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "A complete branch is that byproducts cause indiscriminate acceleration to increase harmful secondary outputs.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail acceleration-associated movement away from required quality.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "A complete branch is that quality drift causes indiscriminate acceleration to degrade output quality.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Competing routes, non-target cases, byproducts, or quality drift could make indiscriminate pathway acceleration harmful.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A selectivity problem can cause indiscriminate acceleration to amplify an unwanted pathway or outcome.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P005-C13-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A barrier threshold does not require competing pathways or harmful byproducts.", "slug": "activation_energy"}], "residual_id": "r:catalytic_pathway_enablement:b009_a14_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b009_a14_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Pathway choice and selectivity matter because competing routes, non-target cases, byproducts, or quality drift could make indiscriminate acceleration harmful. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Pathway choice and selectivity matter because competing routes, non-target cases, byproducts, or quality drift could make indiscriminate acceleration harmful."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "With the disproportionate-side-path acceleration branch fixed, attempted to preserve the exact shared-substrate competition while avoiding possible selectivity harm; the worsened rate ratio and unwanted pathway exclude that witness.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Side Reaction", "one_liner": "An alternative chemical transformation running in parallel with the desired one, competing for the same substrate through its own rate law, so that selectivity — the ratio of desired rate to the sum of all competing rates — governs yield rather than the desired reaction's absolute speed.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:side_reaction", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "side_path_disproportionate_acceleration", "predicate": "The rate-raising change is the exact-record branch in which the competing side pathway accelerates disproportionately.", "rationale": "The retained expression preserves exact roles, relation direction, polarity, modality, quantifier, and one complete DNF branch; any qualifier is one anchored atomic fact and cannot leave the candidate-plus-qualifier true while the unit is false."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "side_reaction"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "side_path_disproportionate_acceleration"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "side_reaction", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P005-C13-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record supplies desired and competing pathways over one substrate, selectivity-controlled harm, and the named temperature branch in which a rate-raising change accelerates the side pathway disproportionately. Selecting that one explicit kinetic branch supplies O1–O4 without mixing DNF branches or inventing a pathway."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Competing pathways or non-target outcomes make indiscriminate acceleration harmful.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The desired transformation is already feasible and legitimate under the governing physical, technical, legal, ethical, or institutional constraints.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this pattern when the same transformation recurs, the destination is already feasible and legitimate, and the delay comes from a barrier that can be reduced by a reusable capability. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: The desired transformation is already feasible and legitimate under the governing physical, technical, legal, ethical, or institutional constraints. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The desired transformation is already feasible and legitimate under the governing physical, technical, legal, ethical, or institutional constraints.", "Use this pattern when the same transformation recurs, the destination is already feasible and legitimate, and the delay comes from a barrier that can be reduced by a reusable capability."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "The desired transformation is already feasible and legitimate under the governing physical, technical, legal, ethical, or institutional constraints."}, {"display_text": "Many substrate units or cases require materially similar transformation, making facilitator reuse valuable.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The organization then adds more substrate or pressure, making the queue and degradation worse. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Many substrate units or cases require materially similar transformation, making facilitator reuse valuable. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Many substrate units or cases require materially similar transformation, making facilitator reuse valuable.", "The organization then adds more substrate or pressure, making the queue and degradation worse."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Many substrate units or cases require materially similar transformation, making facilitator reuse valuable."}, {"display_text": "A facilitator can plausibly lower the barrier without being consumed in proportion to each output and can return to an operationally ready state.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A small reusable capability could lower the barrier on a specific pathway, but the system has not defined the facilitator, interface, turnover capacity, selectivity boundary, regeneration cycle, or safeguards needed to use that leverage reliably. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: A facilitator can plausibly lower the barrier without being consumed in proportion to each output and can return to an operationally ready state. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A facilitator can plausibly lower the barrier without being consumed in proportion to each output and can return to an operationally ready state.", "A small reusable capability could lower the barrier on a specific pathway, but the system has not defined the facilitator, interface, turnover capacity, selectivity boundary, regeneration cycle, or safeguards needed to use that leverage reliably."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "A facilitator can plausibly lower the barrier without being consumed in proportion to each output and can return to an operationally ready state."}, {"display_text": "The system can observe at least rate, quality, capacity, facilitator health, and major downstream effects.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A small reusable capability could lower the barrier on a specific pathway, but the system has not defined the facilitator, interface, turnover capacity, selectivity boundary, regeneration cycle, or safeguards needed to use that leverage reliably. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: The system can observe at least rate, quality, capacity, facilitator health, and major downstream effects. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The system can observe at least rate, quality, capacity, facilitator health, and major downstream effects.", "A small reusable capability could lower the barrier on a specific pathway, but the system has not defined the facilitator, interface, turnover capacity, selectivity boundary, regeneration cycle, or safeguards needed to use that leverage reliably."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The system can observe at least rate, quality, capacity, facilitator health, and major downstream effects."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 9, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-009", "ledger_sha256": "980e3ef99b36dfb5278a681e2b3f6f60e5515ebd167f0101ce54743d45ecdc82"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Catastrophic-Risk Bargaining De-escalation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:catastrophic_risk_bargaining_deescalation", "slug": "catastrophic_risk_bargaining_deescalation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "One or more actors believe they can gain concessions by deliberately increasing the probability of an outcome that would seriously harm all sides or the wider public. Credibility depends partly on making events less controllable—through deadlines, automation, delegation, public commitments, reciprocal mobilization, or ambiguous signals—so ordinary rational bargaining becomes entangled with accident, misperception, tail risk, and status costs. Each actor may prefer safety, yet fear that unilateral restraint will be interpreted as weakness and rewarded with worse terms.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "One or more actors believe they can gain concessions by deliberately increasing the probability of an outcome that would seriously harm all sides or the wider public. Credibility depends partly on making events less controllable—through deadlines, automation, delegation, public commitments, reciprocal mobilization, or ambiguous signals—so ordinary rational bargaining becomes entangled with accident, misperception, tail risk, and status costs. Each actor may prefer safety, yet fear that unilateral restraint will be interpreted as weakness and rewarded with worse terms."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a catastrophe shared by both bargaining parties and strongly dispreferred by both.", "role_mapping": "Shared catastrophe -> catastrophic bargaining outcome; parties -> bargaining actors.", "slug": "brinkmanship", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b009_a15_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A shared catastrophic or systemically damaging outcome is possible and materially affected by bargaining actions. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A shared catastrophic or systemically damaging outcome is possible and materially affected by bargaining actions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Brinkmanship", "one_liner": "Deliberately raising a stochastic risk of shared catastrophe, using the rising probability as a bargaining lever.", "page_ref": "prime:brinkmanship", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Shared catastrophe -> catastrophic bargaining outcome; parties -> bargaining actors.", "slug": "brinkmanship", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a catastrophe shared by both bargaining parties and strongly dispreferred by both."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A bargaining process can produce a shared catastrophic or systemically damaging outcome.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires deliberate initiation or continuation of a probability-ramping escalation process as leverage.", "role_mapping": "Committing actor -> pressure-creating actor; rising probability -> danger.", "slug": "brinkmanship", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b009_a15_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: At least one actor intentionally raises danger, uncertainty, or loss of control to create pressure or credibility. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["At least one actor intentionally raises danger, uncertainty, or loss of control to create pressure or credibility."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Brinkmanship", "one_liner": "Deliberately raising a stochastic risk of shared catastrophe, using the rising probability as a bargaining lever.", "page_ref": "prime:brinkmanship", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Committing actor -> pressure-creating actor; rising probability -> danger.", "slug": "brinkmanship", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires deliberate initiation or continuation of a probability-ramping escalation process as leverage."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "At least one actor intentionally raises danger, uncertainty, or loss of control to create bargaining pressure.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires the counterparty to compare the expected cost of yielding with continuing the catastrophe-risk ramp.", "role_mapping": "Yield-or-continue calculus -> de-escalation dilemma.", "slug": "brinkmanship", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b009_a15_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The other side cannot safely ignore the threat but also fears that unilateral de-escalation concedes the dispute. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The other side cannot safely ignore the threat but also fears that unilateral de-escalation concedes the dispute."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Brinkmanship", "one_liner": "Deliberately raising a stochastic risk of shared catastrophe, using the rising probability as a bargaining lever.", "page_ref": "prime:brinkmanship", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Yield-or-continue calculus -> de-escalation dilemma.", "slug": "brinkmanship", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires the counterparty to compare the expected cost of yielding with continuing the catastrophe-risk ramp."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The counterparty cannot ignore the threat but fears that unilateral de-escalation concedes the dispute.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires ceded control and a nonzero chance the catastrophe fires unchosen.", "role_mapping": "Ceded process -> delegated or automated pathway; residual chance -> stochastic or accidental escalation.", "slug": "brinkmanship", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b009_a15_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The intervention must preserve legitimate bargaining and commitment while removing the incentive to use shared catastrophe, accidental escalation, or nonconsenting parties as collateral. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Escalation includes stochastic, accidental, delegated, automated, or hard-to-attribute pathways.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Escalation includes stochastic, accidental, delegated, automated, or hard-to-attribute pathways.", "The intervention must preserve legitimate bargaining and commitment while removing the incentive to use shared catastrophe, accidental escalation, or nonconsenting parties as collateral."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Brinkmanship", "one_liner": "Deliberately raising a stochastic risk of shared catastrophe, using the rising probability as a bargaining lever.", "page_ref": "prime:brinkmanship", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Ceded process -> delegated or automated pathway; residual chance -> stochastic or accidental escalation.", "slug": "brinkmanship", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires ceded control and a nonzero chance the catastrophe fires unchosen."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Escalation includes stochastic, accidental, delegated, automated, or hard-to-attribute pathways.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A non-internalized third-party effect can be beneficial and therefore does not require material downside.", "slug": "externality"}, {"falls_short_because": "Voluntary priced transfer to a capable counterparty does not require nonconsenting third-party harm.", "slug": "risk_transfer"}], "residual_id": "r:catastrophic_risk_bargaining_deescalation:b009_a15_c5", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b009_a15_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The intervention must preserve legitimate bargaining and commitment while removing the incentive to use shared catastrophe, accidental escalation, or nonconsenting parties as collateral. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Nonconsenting third parties bear material downside or essential services are exposed.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Nonconsenting third parties bear material downside or essential services are exposed.", "The intervention must preserve legitimate bargaining and commitment while removing the incentive to use shared catastrophe, accidental escalation, or nonconsenting parties as collateral."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A non-internalized third-party effect can be beneficial and therefore does not require material downside.", "slug": "externality"}, {"falls_short_because": "Voluntary priced transfer to a capable counterparty does not require nonconsenting third-party harm.", "slug": "risk_transfer"}], "normalized_requirement": "Nonconsenting third parties bear material downside or essential services are exposed.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Nonconsenting third parties bear material downside or essential services are exposed.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A bounded commitment, verification, mediation, or reciprocal stand-down path could replace the risk mechanism.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Credibility depends partly on making events less controllable—through deadlines, automation, delegation, public commitments, reciprocal mobilization, or ambiguous signals—so ordinary rational bargaining becomes entangled with accident, misperception, tail risk, and status costs. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: A bounded commitment, verification, mediation, or reciprocal stand-down path could replace the risk mechanism. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A bounded commitment, verification, mediation, or reciprocal stand-down path could replace the risk mechanism.", "Credibility depends partly on making events less controllable—through deadlines, automation, delegation, public commitments, reciprocal mobilization, or ambiguous signals—so ordinary rational bargaining becomes entangled with accident, misperception, tail risk, and status costs."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "A bounded commitment, verification, mediation, or reciprocal stand-down path could replace the risk mechanism."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 9, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-009", "ledger_sha256": "980e3ef99b36dfb5278a681e2b3f6f60e5515ebd167f0101ce54743d45ecdc82"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Category Boundary Audit", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:category_boundary_audit", "slug": "category_boundary_audit"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 5 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is that categories simplify variation, but the simplification can become unaccountable. A category boundary may be treated as natural even when it reflects institutional convenience, historical assumptions, narrow evidence requirements, power, or outdated purposes.\n\nThe practical symptoms are recurring borderline cases, inconsistent application, silent exclusion, unexplained false positives or false negatives, and category drift across teams or systems. The deeper tension is that action requires categories, but categories can become harmful when their inclusion and exclusion logic is invisible.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A category is being used as if its boundary were obvious, natural, neutral, or already settled, even though edge cases, exclusions, hidden assumptions, or power-laden distinctions shape consequential outcomes."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Assigning items to categories does not require consequential access or responsibility effects.", "slug": "classification"}], "residual_id": "r:category_boundary_audit:b010_a01_c1", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b010_a01_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A category controls access, responsibility, risk, recognition, routing, or measurement. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A category controls access, responsibility, risk, recognition, routing, or measurement."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Assigning items to categories does not require consequential access or responsibility effects.", "slug": "classification"}], "normalized_requirement": "Category membership controls access, responsibility, risk, recognition, routing, or measurement.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Category membership controls access, responsibility, risk, recognition, routing, or measurement.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P005-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern category edge cases rather than ordinary members.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The affected objects are borderline cases near a classification boundary.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern treatment or disposition of the cases, not only category definition.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A system or responsible actor handles the borderline cases.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail inconsistent handling rather than legitimate rule-based differentiation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A complete branch is that handling differs inconsistently across comparable borderline cases or actors.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail hidden handling rather than merely complex but observable handling.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A complete branch is that handling of borderline cases is not visible or inspectable.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Borderline category cases are handled inconsistently or invisibly.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Classification-boundary cases receive handling that lacks consistency or visibility.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P005-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A category system can handle edge cases consistently and visibly.", "slug": "classification"}], "residual_id": "r:category_boundary_audit:b010_a01_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b010_a01_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Borderline cases are handled inconsistently or invisibly. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Borderline cases are handled inconsistently or invisibly."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Attempted a complete label-ambiguity instance with boundary cases and annotator handling but no inconsistent dispositions; the exact inter-annotator disagreement zone excludes that witness.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Label Ambiguity", "one_liner": "Diagnose a headline accuracy figure as a blend of two measurements — model capability in the class interior where annotators agree, and mere adjudication agreement in the boundary zone where reasonable experts split — by stratifying metrics on the inter-annotator agreement rate.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:label_ambiguity", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "label_ambiguity"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "label_ambiguity", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P005-C14-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record universally concerns borderline cases at a fuzzy classification boundary, human adjudicators assigning them labels, and reasonable experts giving inconsistent dispositions in the disagreement zone. That directly entails the O1+O2+O3 DNF branch; hidden handling in O4 is unnecessary."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Borderline category cases are handled inconsistently or invisibly.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P005-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern a formal or operative classification boundary, not any social distinction.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The causal source is a boundary used to assign entities to classification categories.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must make the category boundary a source of risk rather than a coincident feature.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The classification boundary creates the branch-specific risk.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve risk modality and must not require completed harm.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The source asserts risk of harm, not that the harmful outcome has necessarily occurred.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail consequential rather than negligible classification-boundary risk.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The risk is material enough to matter for classification governance.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail a fairness consequence tied to category-boundary placement.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "A complete branch is material risk of unfair treatment across the boundary.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail an identity consequence tied to category-boundary placement.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "A complete branch is material risk to identity recognition or attribution across the boundary.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail exclusion risk tied to being placed outside or across the category boundary.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "A complete branch is material risk of exclusion caused by the boundary.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "A classification boundary creates material fairness, identity, or exclusion risk.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A category boundary creates a material risk to affected entities or stakeholders.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P005-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A social distinction need not control formal classification or create material exclusion risk.", "slug": "symbolic_boundaries"}], "residual_id": "r:category_boundary_audit:b010_a01_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b010_a01_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A classification boundary carries fairness, identity, or exclusion risk. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A classification boundary carries fairness, identity, or exclusion risk."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A social distinction need not control formal classification or create material exclusion risk.", "slug": "symbolic_boundaries"}], "normalized_requirement": "A classification boundary creates material fairness, identity, or exclusion risk.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A classification boundary creates material fairness, identity, or exclusion risk.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Graded membership around prototypes does not require an institutional category to be naturalized.", "slug": "prototype_theory"}], "residual_id": "r:category_boundary_audit:b010_a01_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b010_a01_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The category seems natural but actually reflects institutional convenience, inherited vocabulary, or unexamined values. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The category seems natural but actually reflects institutional convenience, inherited vocabulary, or unexamined values."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Graded membership around prototypes does not require an institutional category to be naturalized.", "slug": "prototype_theory"}], "normalized_requirement": "The category appears natural while encoding institutional convenience, inherited language, or unexamined values.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The category appears natural while encoding institutional convenience, inherited language, or unexamined values.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P006-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern an operative category, not an arbitrary inherited component.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The focal object is a currently used classification category.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve provenance from an old schema to the current category.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The category is inherited from an older classification schema.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must compare design purpose with current application, not merely two schema versions.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The compared intents are the source schema's original purpose and the category's present use.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve temporal inheritance and subsequent change of use context.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The source purpose belongs to an earlier schema context while the use belongs to the present context.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail present purpose-use mismatch rather than continued fitness.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The original purpose no longer matches the current use.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "The category is inherited from an old schema whose original purpose no longer matches current use.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An inherited category schema is used in a context that no longer fits the schema's original purpose.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P006-C01-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An inherited substrate can constrain new work without a category schema or purpose mismatch.", "slug": "inherited_substrate_risk"}], "residual_id": "r:category_boundary_audit:b010_a01_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b010_a01_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The category is inherited from an old schema whose purpose no longer matches current use. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The category is inherited from an old schema whose purpose no longer matches current use."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An inherited substrate can constrain new work without a category schema or purpose mismatch.", "slug": "inherited_substrate_risk"}], "normalized_requirement": "The category is inherited from a schema whose original purpose no longer matches current use.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The category is inherited from a schema whose original purpose no longer matches current use.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 10, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-010", "ledger_sha256": "998abef476780c036b71ce06ee46ea93d406f3c1d11cc24bc05ec5708e571939"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Causal Layer Reframing", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:causal_layer_reframing", "slug": "causal_layer_reframing"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 6, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is layer collapse. Events, systems, assumptions, and stories are all mixed together, so people argue within a single frame and keep choosing familiar interventions. Visible symptoms receive attention because they are measurable, urgent, or politically salient, while deeper structures and narratives continue to regenerate the same pattern.\n\nThis produces a characteristic failure: better evidence does not change action because the frame that interprets the evidence remains unchanged.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Actors respond to visible symptoms while deeper systems, assumptions, discourses, or myths keep reproducing the issue."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Repeated return does not require prior surface interventions or their failure.", "slug": "recurrence"}], "residual_id": "r:causal_layer_reframing:b010_a02_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b010_a02_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The same visible problem keeps recurring after surface fixes. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The same visible problem keeps recurring after surface fixes."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Repeated return does not require prior surface interventions or their failure.", "slug": "recurrence"}], "normalized_requirement": "The visible problem recurs after repeated surface fixes.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The visible problem recurs after repeated surface fixes.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Every frame constrains action, but need not do so excessively or invisibly.", "slug": "problem_framing"}], "residual_id": "r:causal_layer_reframing:b010_a02_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b010_a02_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The dominant frame makes only a narrow set of actions seem reasonable. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The dominant frame makes only a narrow set of actions seem reasonable."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Every frame constrains action, but need not do so excessively or invisibly.", "slug": "problem_framing"}], "normalized_requirement": "The dominant problem frame makes only a narrow action set appear reasonable.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The dominant problem frame makes only a narrow action set appear reasonable.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Multiple possible frames do not require active stakeholder disagreement.", "slug": "problem_framing"}], "residual_id": "r:causal_layer_reframing:b010_a02_c3", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_AMBIGUITY", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b010_a02_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Stakeholders disagree about what kind of problem this is. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders disagree about what kind of problem this is."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Multiple possible frames do not require active stakeholder disagreement.", "slug": "problem_framing"}], "normalized_requirement": "Stakeholders disagree about what kind of problem is present.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_AMBIGUITY", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Stakeholders disagree about what kind of problem is present.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P006-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern anticipatory or strategic analysis, not arbitrary reporting.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The focal process is a futures, foresight, or strategy process.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail trend description as the current analytic activity.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The process operates at the layer of describing visible trends.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve persistent stalling, not a normal descriptive first step.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The process remains at that layer rather than passing through it temporarily.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail failure to move beyond the descriptive trend layer.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The process does not progress beyond description into deeper causal, structural, or interpretive work.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "A futures or strategy process remains stuck at trend description.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An anticipatory planning process remains confined to describing trends rather than progressing to deeper analysis.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P006-C02-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Systematic anticipation can include causal and normative work rather than remain descriptive.", "slug": "foresight"}], "residual_id": "r:causal_layer_reframing:b010_a02_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b010_a02_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A futures or strategy process is stuck in trend description. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A futures or strategy process is stuck in trend description."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Systematic anticipation can include causal and normative work rather than remain descriptive.", "slug": "foresight"}], "normalized_requirement": "A futures or strategy process remains stuck at trend description.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A futures or strategy process remains stuck at trend description.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P006-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern analysis of system structure, not any information intervention.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The intervention or input is structural analysis of the issue.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the analysis-alone condition rather than a combined intervention.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Structural analysis is used alone without another change mechanism.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern behavioral response rather than only understanding or discourse.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The intended outcome role is change in relevant actor behavior.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail failure of behavioral change rather than weak but actual change.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The structural analysis does not change the relevant behavior.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Structural analysis alone is not changing behavior.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Structural analysis by itself fails to alter relevant actor behavior.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P006-C03-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P006-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern analysis of system structure, not any information intervention.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The intervention or input is structural analysis of the issue.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the analysis-alone condition rather than a combined intervention.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Structural analysis is used alone without another legitimating or change mechanism.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern legitimacy rather than behavior, knowledge, or operational performance.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The intended outcome role is change in perceived or institutional legitimacy.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail failure of legitimacy change rather than weak but actual change.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The structural analysis does not change the relevant legitimacy.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Structural analysis alone is not changing legitimacy.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Structural analysis by itself fails to alter the perceived or institutional legitimacy of the relevant arrangement.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P006-C03-U2"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Breaking a system into parts does not require a failed behavior-change attempt.", "slug": "decomposition"}], "residual_id": "r:causal_layer_reframing:b010_a02_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b010_a02_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Structural analysis alone is not changing behavior or legitimacy. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Structural analysis alone is not changing behavior or legitimacy."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 2, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 2}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Breaking a system into parts does not require a failed behavior-change attempt.", "slug": "decomposition"}], "normalized_requirement": "Structural analysis has not changed behavior or legitimacy.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 2 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Structural analysis has not changed behavior or legitimacy.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The recurring problem spans empirical, structural, interpretive, and normative causal layers that imply different interventions.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The recurring problem spans empirical, structural, interpretive, and normative causal layers that imply different interventions.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A decision requires both diagnosis and reframing.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: A decision requires both diagnosis and reframing. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A decision requires both diagnosis and reframing."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "A decision requires both diagnosis and reframing."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 10, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-010", "ledger_sha256": "998abef476780c036b71ce06ee46ea93d406f3c1d11cc24bc05ec5708e571939"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Causal Mechanism Mapping", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:causal_mechanism_mapping", "slug": "causal_mechanism_mapping"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 4, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 6, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 4 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is causal shortcutting. Actors move from “these things are associated,” “this happened before that,” “this explanation sounds plausible,” or “this actor is visible” to “this caused that.” The missing middle is the mechanism: the pathway through which influence is transmitted.\n\nWithout the mechanism, interventions tend to target symptoms, proxies, blamed individuals, or politically convenient levers. A product team may copy a feature without copying the conditions that made it work. An incident team may punish a person without fixing the tool and governance pathway that enabled the failure. A policy team may fund the activity most associated with success while missing selection effects or contextual barriers.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Actors treat a relationship as causal because it is correlated, sequential, plausible, emotionally salient, or politically useful, but they have not specified the pathway through which the proposed cause would produce the target effect. As a result, interventions target visible symptoms, convenient levers, or blamed actors instead of the mechanism that actually drives the outcome."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A causal relation can be studied without justifying an action.", "slug": "causality"}], "residual_id": "r:causal_mechanism_mapping:b010_a03_c1", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b010_a03_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A proposed cause is being used to justify action. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A proposed cause is being used to justify action."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A causal relation can be studied without justifying an action.", "slug": "causality"}], "normalized_requirement": "A proposed causal claim is being used to justify action.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A proposed causal claim is being used to justify action.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A genuine causal relation requires more than post hoc temporal attribution.", "slug": "causality"}], "residual_id": "r:causal_mechanism_mapping:b010_a03_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b010_a03_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A metric changes after a decision and the team assumes the decision caused it. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A metric changes after a decision and the team assumes the decision caused it."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A genuine causal relation requires more than post hoc temporal attribution.", "slug": "causality"}], "normalized_requirement": "A metric changed after a decision and temporal order is being treated as proof of causation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A metric changed after a decision and temporal order is being treated as proof of causation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Uncertain loss does not require a causal intervention claim.", "slug": "risk"}], "residual_id": "r:causal_mechanism_mapping:b010_a03_c6", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b010_a03_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A high-stakes intervention would be costly, risky, or ethically sensitive if the causal claim is wrong. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A high-stakes intervention would be costly, risky, or ethically sensitive if the causal claim is wrong."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Uncertain loss does not require a causal intervention claim.", "slug": "risk"}], "normalized_requirement": "A wrong causal claim would make a high-stakes intervention costly, risky, or ethically sensitive.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A wrong causal claim would make a high-stakes intervention costly, risky, or ethically sensitive.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A causal relation can be studied without justifying an action.", "slug": "causality"}], "residual_id": "r:causal_mechanism_mapping:b010_a03_c1", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b010_a03_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A proposed cause is being used to justify action. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A proposed cause is being used to justify action."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A causal relation can be studied without justifying an action.", "slug": "causality"}], "normalized_requirement": "A proposed causal claim is being used to justify action.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A proposed causal claim is being used to justify action.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P006-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern retrospective failure explanation, not a prospective causal hypothesis alone.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The asserting process is a review of an incident or failure.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail an actual causal attribution, not merely a list of contributing facts.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The review names a condition as the root cause of the incident.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern intermediate causal mechanism, not missing evidence for the condition's existence.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The missing explanation is a pathway connecting the named condition to the target failure.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve cause-to-effect direction and the incident failure endpoint.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The required path runs directionally from the named condition to production of the failure.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail explanatory inability or absence rather than an incomplete but adequate trace.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The review cannot explain or trace that path.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "An incident review names a root cause but cannot explain the path from that condition to the failure.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A review asserts a root cause without an explainable mechanism linking the named condition to the incident failure.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P006-C04-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A fully specified latent causal path is the missing explanation, not evidence that the review lacks one.", "slug": "conjunctive_path_activation"}], "residual_id": "r:causal_mechanism_mapping:b010_a03_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b010_a03_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: An incident review names a root cause but cannot explain the path from condition to failure. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["An incident review names a root cause but cannot explain the path from condition to failure."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A fully specified latent causal path is the missing explanation, not evidence that the review lacks one.", "slug": "conjunctive_path_activation"}], "normalized_requirement": "An incident review names a root cause without tracing the path from condition to failure.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "An incident review names a root cause without tracing the path from condition to failure.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Uncertain loss does not require a causal intervention claim.", "slug": "risk"}], "residual_id": "r:causal_mechanism_mapping:b010_a03_c6", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b010_a03_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A high-stakes intervention would be costly, risky, or ethically sensitive if the causal claim is wrong. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A high-stakes intervention would be costly, risky, or ethically sensitive if the causal claim is wrong."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Uncertain loss does not require a causal intervention claim.", "slug": "risk"}], "normalized_requirement": "A wrong causal claim would make a high-stakes intervention costly, risky, or ethically sensitive.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A wrong causal claim would make a high-stakes intervention costly, risky, or ethically sensitive.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A causal relation can be studied without justifying an action.", "slug": "causality"}], "residual_id": "r:causal_mechanism_mapping:b010_a03_c1", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b010_a03_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A proposed cause is being used to justify action. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A proposed cause is being used to justify action."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A causal relation can be studied without justifying an action.", "slug": "causality"}], "normalized_requirement": "A proposed causal claim is being used to justify action.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A proposed causal claim is being used to justify action.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A preimage can be a singleton and does not require competing causal narratives.", "slug": "preimage"}], "residual_id": "r:causal_mechanism_mapping:b010_a03_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b010_a03_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when a correlation is persuasive but not yet actionable, when a timeline is being treated as proof, when multiple causal stories compete, or when a solution is being copied from one context to another. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Multiple plausible causal stories compete for the same outcome.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Multiple plausible causal stories compete for the same outcome.", "It is especially useful when a correlation is persuasive but not yet actionable, when a timeline is being treated as proof, when multiple causal stories compete, or when a solution is being copied from one context to another."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A preimage can be a singleton and does not require competing causal narratives.", "slug": "preimage"}], "normalized_requirement": "Multiple plausible causal stories compete for the same outcome.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Multiple plausible causal stories compete for the same outcome.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Uncertain loss does not require a causal intervention claim.", "slug": "risk"}], "residual_id": "r:causal_mechanism_mapping:b010_a03_c6", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b010_a03_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A high-stakes intervention would be costly, risky, or ethically sensitive if the causal claim is wrong. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A high-stakes intervention would be costly, risky, or ethically sensitive if the causal claim is wrong."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Uncertain loss does not require a causal intervention claim.", "slug": "risk"}], "normalized_requirement": "A wrong causal claim would make a high-stakes intervention costly, risky, or ethically sensitive.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A wrong causal claim would make a high-stakes intervention costly, risky, or ethically sensitive.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A causal relation can be studied without justifying an action.", "slug": "causality"}], "residual_id": "r:causal_mechanism_mapping:b010_a03_c1", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b010_a03_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A proposed cause is being used to justify action. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A proposed cause is being used to justify action."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A causal relation can be studied without justifying an action.", "slug": "causality"}], "normalized_requirement": "A proposed causal claim is being used to justify action.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A proposed causal claim is being used to justify action.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Skill transfer does not require a causal mechanism claim or context invariance.", "slug": "transfer_of_learning"}], "residual_id": "r:causal_mechanism_mapping:b010_a03_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b010_a03_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A mechanism is assumed to transfer from one context to another. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A mechanism is assumed to transfer from one context to another."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Skill transfer does not require a causal mechanism claim or context invariance.", "slug": "transfer_of_learning"}], "normalized_requirement": "A mechanism is assumed to transfer across contexts without a demonstrated invariance argument.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A mechanism is assumed to transfer across contexts without a demonstrated invariance argument.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Uncertain loss does not require a causal intervention claim.", "slug": "risk"}], "residual_id": "r:causal_mechanism_mapping:b010_a03_c6", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b010_a03_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A high-stakes intervention would be costly, risky, or ethically sensitive if the causal claim is wrong. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A high-stakes intervention would be costly, risky, or ethically sensitive if the causal claim is wrong."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Uncertain loss does not require a causal intervention claim.", "slug": "risk"}], "normalized_requirement": "A wrong causal claim would make a high-stakes intervention costly, risky, or ethically sensitive.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A wrong causal claim would make a high-stakes intervention costly, risky, or ethically sensitive.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 10, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-010", "ledger_sha256": "998abef476780c036b71ce06ee46ea93d406f3c1d11cc24bc05ec5708e571939"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Cautious Pattern Completion", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:cautious_pattern_completion", "slug": "cautious_pattern_completion"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is that pattern-completing minds and systems prefer coherent wholes. Once a coherent whole exists, it becomes cognitively easier to remember, repeat, and defend than the messy partial input that produced it. This can convert missing evidence into assumed detail and assumed detail into apparent fact.\n\nThe risk is not merely being wrong. The deeper risk is loss of traceability: later users cannot tell which parts were observed, which were inferred, and which were never checked. The completion becomes hard to revise because it no longer carries its uncertainty with it.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A person, team, model, or organization infers a coherent whole from partial evidence and then risks treating that inferred completion as if it were fully observed or verified."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a partial cue informationally sparse relative to the reconstructed pattern.", "role_mapping": "Partial cue -> incomplete evidence; stored trace -> prior structure.", "slug": "pattern_completion", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b010_a04_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The available evidence is partial, ambiguous, noisy, truncated, indirect, or drawn from only one perspective. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The available evidence is partial, ambiguous, noisy, truncated, indirect, or drawn from only one perspective."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Pattern Completion (Filling the Incomplete)", "one_liner": "Infer missing structure.", "page_ref": "prime:pattern_completion", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Partial cue -> incomplete evidence; stored trace -> prior structure.", "slug": "pattern_completion", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a partial cue informationally sparse relative to the reconstructed pattern."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Available evidence is partial, ambiguous, noisy, truncated, indirect, or one-sided.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires prior-informed inference to fill content not specified by the input.", "role_mapping": "Completion output -> plausible reconstruction; missing input -> incomplete evidence.", "slug": "pattern_completion", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime requires generation and provisional selection of a hypothesis that best explains an observation while remaining defeasible.", "role_mapping": "Surprising observation -> partial evidence; provisional explainer -> plausible story.", "slug": "abductive_reasoning", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b010_a04_c2a", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A plausible story, diagnosis, reconstruction, or interpretation can be generated before enough verification is available. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A plausible story, diagnosis, reconstruction, or interpretation can be generated before enough verification is available."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Pattern Completion (Filling the Incomplete)", "one_liner": "Infer missing structure.", "page_ref": "prime:pattern_completion", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Completion output -> plausible reconstruction; missing input -> incomplete evidence.", "slug": "pattern_completion", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires prior-informed inference to fill content not specified by the input."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Abductive Reasoning", "one_liner": "Infer the hypothesis that would best explain a surprising observation, accepted provisionally and held defeasibly against better candidates.", "page_ref": "prime:abductive_reasoning", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Surprising observation -> partial evidence; provisional explainer -> plausible story.", "slug": "abductive_reasoning", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires generation and provisional selection of a hypothesis that best explains an observation while remaining defeasible."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A plausible explanatory or reconstructive completion can be generated from partial evidence.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Reconstructing missing structure does not require a costly decision deadline or action risk.", "slug": "pattern_completion"}], "residual_id": "r:cautious_pattern_completion:b010_a04_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b010_a04_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Waiting for complete evidence is costly, but acting on an unsupported completion is also risky. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Waiting for complete evidence is costly, but acting on an unsupported completion is also risky."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Reconstructing missing structure does not require a costly decision deadline or action risk.", "slug": "pattern_completion"}], "normalized_requirement": "Waiting for complete evidence is costly while unsupported completion is also risky.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Waiting for complete evidence is costly while unsupported completion is also risky.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The completed output need not be believed with excessive confidence.", "slug": "pattern_completion"}], "residual_id": "r:cautious_pattern_completion:b010_a04_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b010_a04_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Fluent outputs, familiar patterns, strong priors, or organizational pressure make the completion feel more certain than it is. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Fluent outputs, familiar patterns, strong priors, or organizational pressure make the completion feel more certain than it is."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The completed output need not be believed with excessive confidence.", "slug": "pattern_completion"}], "normalized_requirement": "Fluency, familiarity, strong priors, or organizational pressure causes unjustified confidence in the completion.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Fluency, familiarity, strong priors, or organizational pressure causes unjustified confidence in the completion.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Competing hypotheses need not imply different owners, risks, or actions.", "slug": "abductive_reasoning"}], "residual_id": "r:cautious_pattern_completion:b010_a04_c5", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b010_a04_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Different completions would imply different actions, owners, risks, or ethical obligations. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Different completions would imply different actions, owners, risks, or ethical obligations."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Competing hypotheses need not imply different owners, risks, or actions.", "slug": "abductive_reasoning"}], "normalized_requirement": "Alternative completions imply different actions, owners, risks, or ethical obligations.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Alternative completions imply different actions, owners, risks, or ethical obligations.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 10, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-010", "ledger_sha256": "998abef476780c036b71ce06ee46ea93d406f3c1d11cc24bc05ec5708e571939"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Central Reserve Redeployment", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:central_reserve_redeployment", "slug": "central_reserve_redeployment"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 5, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Several fronts compete for scarce capacity. Each front has some local ability, but none can economically hold every specialist, asset, authority, spare, or surge unit it may need. Lateral coordination among peripheral fronts is slow, fragmented, or based on incompatible information. A centrally positioned actor or tier has shorter effective paths to the front set, yet the potential advantage is unrealized because the reserve is not protected, mobile, visible, preauthorized, route-ready, or recoverable.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Several fronts compete for scarce capacity. Each front has some local ability, but none can economically hold every specialist, asset, authority, spare, or surge unit it may need. Lateral coordination among peripheral fronts is slow, fragmented, or based on incompatible information. A centrally positioned actor or tier has shorter effective paths to the front set, yet the potential advantage is unrealized because the reserve is not protected, mobile, visible, preauthorized, route-ready, or recoverable."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires multiple peripheral demand fronts sharing a finite central reservoir.", "role_mapping": "Peripheral demand sources -> fronts; shared reservoir -> scarce capability.", "slug": "interior_lines", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b010_a05_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: At least two fronts can plausibly require the same scarce capability within overlapping planning horizons. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["At least two fronts can plausibly require the same scarce capability within overlapping planning horizons."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Interior Lines", "one_liner": "A centrally-positioned actor with shorter paths to multiple fronts converts a positional property into a reaction-time advantage, reallocating a shared reservoir faster than a dispersed periphery can coordinate.", "page_ref": "prime:interior_lines", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Peripheral demand sources -> fronts; shared reservoir -> scarce capability.", "slug": "interior_lines", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires multiple peripheral demand fronts sharing a finite central reservoir."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Multiple fronts can require the same scarce capability within overlapping horizons.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a topologically central node with shorter transfer paths to each front than peripheral coordination paths.", "role_mapping": "Central node -> reserve tier; transfer times -> response paths.", "slug": "interior_lines", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b010_a05_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A candidate central position or tier has shorter effective response paths than lateral or external coordination alternatives. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A candidate central position or tier has shorter effective response paths than lateral or external coordination alternatives."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Interior Lines", "one_liner": "A centrally-positioned actor with shorter paths to multiple fronts converts a positional property into a reaction-time advantage, reallocating a shared reservoir faster than a dispersed periphery can coordinate.", "page_ref": "prime:interior_lines", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Central node -> reserve tier; transfer times -> response paths.", "slug": "interior_lines", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a topologically central node with shorter transfer paths to each front than peripheral coordination paths."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A central position has shorter effective response paths to the fronts than lateral or external alternatives.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a reallocation capability fast enough to convert centrality into reaction-time advantage.", "role_mapping": "Transferable reservoir -> resource; reallocation time -> useful-after-arrival latency.", "slug": "interior_lines", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b010_a05_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The resource can be transferred, packaged, credentialed, or translated quickly enough to become useful after arrival. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The resource can be transferred, packaged, credentialed, or translated quickly enough to become useful after arrival."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Interior Lines", "one_liner": "A centrally-positioned actor with shorter paths to multiple fronts converts a positional property into a reaction-time advantage, reallocating a shared reservoir faster than a dispersed periphery can coordinate.", "page_ref": "prime:interior_lines", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Transferable reservoir -> resource; reallocation time -> useful-after-arrival latency.", "slug": "interior_lines", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a reallocation capability fast enough to convert centrality into reaction-time advantage."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The resource can be transferred and made operational quickly enough after arrival.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Central advantage can exist under predictable sequential demand and does not require a duplication-cost comparison.", "slug": "interior_lines"}], "residual_id": "r:central_reserve_redeployment:b010_a05_c4", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b010_a05_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Demand is uncertain or bursty enough that full duplication at every front has poor utilization or prohibitive cost. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Demand is uncertain or bursty enough that full duplication at every front has poor utilization or prohibitive cost."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Central advantage can exist under predictable sequential demand and does not require a duplication-cost comparison.", "slug": "interior_lines"}], "normalized_requirement": "Demand is uncertain or bursty enough that full duplication at every front is inefficient.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Demand is uncertain or bursty enough that full duplication at every front is inefficient.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires rapid concentration of a shared reservoir at successive fronts to create positional advantage.", "role_mapping": "Concentrated reallocation -> temporary mass; reaction advantage -> outcome change.", "slug": "interior_lines", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b010_a05_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Temporary concentration at one front can change the outcome more than even distribution would. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Temporary concentration at one front can change the outcome more than even distribution would."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Interior Lines", "one_liner": "A centrally-positioned actor with shorter paths to multiple fronts converts a positional property into a reaction-time advantage, reallocating a shared reservoir faster than a dispersed periphery can coordinate.", "page_ref": "prime:interior_lines", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Concentrated reallocation -> temporary mass; reaction advantage -> outcome change.", "slug": "interior_lines", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires rapid concentration of a shared reservoir at successive fronts to create positional advantage."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Temporary concentration at one front can change the outcome more than even distribution.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime conditions central advantage on an adequate shared reservoir relative to worst-case simultaneous demand.", "role_mapping": "Adequate reservoir -> non-dominant joint peak; simultaneous fronts -> peak possibility.", "slug": "interior_lines", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b010_a05_c10", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Simultaneous peak demand is possible but not so dominant that one shared reserve is structurally inadequate. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [10], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Simultaneous peak demand is possible but not so dominant that one shared reserve is structurally inadequate."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Interior Lines", "one_liner": "A centrally-positioned actor with shorter paths to multiple fronts converts a positional property into a reaction-time advantage, reallocating a shared reservoir faster than a dispersed periphery can coordinate.", "page_ref": "prime:interior_lines", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Adequate reservoir -> non-dominant joint peak; simultaneous fronts -> peak possibility.", "slug": "interior_lines", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime conditions central advantage on an adequate shared reservoir relative to worst-case simultaneous demand."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Simultaneous peak demand is possible but not so dominant that one shared reserve is structurally inadequate.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [10], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Each front can maintain a bounded minimum local capability until reinforcement arrives.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Each front has some local ability, but none can economically hold every specialist, asset, authority, spare, or surge unit it may need. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: Each front can maintain a bounded minimum local capability until reinforcement arrives. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Each front can maintain a bounded minimum local capability until reinforcement arrives.", "Each front has some local ability, but none can economically hold every specialist, asset, authority, spare, or surge unit it may need."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Each front can maintain a bounded minimum local capability until reinforcement arrives."}, {"display_text": "Front state, route health, reserve readiness, and decision authority can be made observable.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A centrally positioned actor or tier has shorter effective paths to the front set, yet the potential advantage is unrealized because the reserve is not protected, mobile, visible, preauthorized, route-ready, or recoverable. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: Front state, route health, reserve readiness, and decision authority can be made observable. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Front state, route health, reserve readiness, and decision authority can be made observable.", "A centrally positioned actor or tier has shorter effective paths to the front set, yet the potential advantage is unrealized because the reserve is not protected, mobile, visible, preauthorized, route-ready, or recoverable."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "Front state, route health, reserve readiness, and decision authority can be made observable."}, {"display_text": "The reserve can be recalled, replenished, rested, repaired, or retasked after deployment.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: The reserve can be recalled, replenished, rested, repaired, or retasked after deployment. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The reserve can be recalled, replenished, rested, repaired, or retasked after deployment."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 8, "text": "The reserve can be recalled, replenished, rested, repaired, or retasked after deployment."}, {"display_text": "Competing fronts can be prioritized under legitimate, reviewable criteria.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this deployment constraint: Competing fronts can be prioritized under legitimate, reviewable criteria. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [9], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Competing fronts can be prioritized under legitimate, reviewable criteria."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 9, "text": "Competing fronts can be prioritized under legitimate, reviewable criteria."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 10, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-010", "ledger_sha256": "998abef476780c036b71ce06ee46ea93d406f3c1d11cc24bc05ec5708e571939"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Change Resistance Diagnosis and Support", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:change_resistance_diagnosis_and_support", "slug": "change_resistance_diagnosis_and_support"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is that the new state is not yet locally workable or legitimate. The old state may be inefficient from a system perspective, but it may still be familiar, rewarded, identity-safe, technically integrated, socially expected, or less risky for the people expected to change. Resistance appears when the transition asks actors to bear cost, uncertainty, exposure, status loss, cognitive load, or operational risk without enough support or legitimacy.\n\nThis problem often hides beneath the language of buy-in. A low-buy-in diagnosis is too vague. The useful question is: what makes the new behavior hard, unsafe, unrewarded, illegitimate, or low-trust compared with the old behavior?", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A beneficial, required, or strategically chosen change is resisted because actors face cost, uncertainty, identity threat, mistrust, habit, misaligned incentives, limited capacity, or a legitimacy gap."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires status-quo forces to maintain existing practice against a proposed change.", "role_mapping": "Status quo equilibrium -> old practice; restraining force -> nonadoption.", "slug": "resistance_to_change", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b010_a06_c1a", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A formally approved change is not becoming lived practice. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A formally approved change is not becoming lived practice"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Resistance to Change", "one_liner": "Maintain status quo.", "page_ref": "prime:resistance_to_change", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Status quo equilibrium -> old practice; restraining force -> nonadoption.", "slug": "resistance_to_change", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires status-quo forces to maintain existing practice against a proposed change."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A proposed change is not becoming lived practice.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P006-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern resistance signals directed at a change, not arbitrary criticism.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The interpreted content is an objection or expression of resistance to a change process.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail a moralized interpretation or framing of the objection without requiring attribution of bad character or moral fault.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Responsible actors interpret or frame the objection in moral terms.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the alternative process-diagnostic role of the objection.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The displaced interpretation would treat the objection as information about defects, costs, or constraints in the change process.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail substitution of moral judgment for process diagnosis, not mere coexistence.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Moralization is used instead of diagnosis of the change process.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the missing diagnostic treatment rather than a diagnosis followed by moral judgment.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The objections are not diagnosed as information about the change process.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Objections to a change are moralized rather than diagnosed as information about the change process.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Change objections are framed in moral terms instead of treated as diagnostic evidence about the change process.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P006-C05-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Resistance can be correctly understood as protective rather than moralized.", "slug": "resistance_to_change"}], "residual_id": "r:change_resistance_diagnosis_and_support:b010_a06_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b010_a06_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Objections are being moralized rather than diagnosed. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Objections are being moralized rather than diagnosed"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Resistance can be correctly understood as protective rather than moralized.", "slug": "resistance_to_change"}], "normalized_requirement": "Objections are moralized rather than diagnosed as information about the change process.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Objections are moralized rather than diagnosed as information about the change process.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Shifted risk does not require a transition burden or adoption process.", "slug": "risk_migration"}], "residual_id": "r:change_resistance_diagnosis_and_support:b010_a06_c3", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b010_a06_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Transition burden falls unevenly. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Transition burden falls unevenly"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Shifted risk does not require a transition burden or adoption process.", "slug": "risk_migration"}], "normalized_requirement": "Transition burden falls unevenly across affected actors.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Transition burden falls unevenly across affected actors.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires restraining forces grounded in identity, competence, relationship, uncertainty, or fairness protection.", "role_mapping": "Protective status quo -> locally rational old state.", "slug": "resistance_to_change", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b010_a06_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The old state remains locally rational. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The old state remains locally rational"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Resistance to Change", "one_liner": "Maintain status quo.", "page_ref": "prime:resistance_to_change", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Protective status quo -> locally rational old state.", "slug": "resistance_to_change", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires restraining forces grounded in identity, competence, relationship, uncertainty, or fairness protection."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Maintaining the old state remains locally rational because it protects identity, competence, relationships, or fairness.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Change resistance can persist under high trust and legitimacy because of competence or identity loss.", "slug": "resistance_to_change"}], "residual_id": "r:change_resistance_diagnosis_and_support:b010_a06_c5", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b010_a06_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Trust or legitimacy is weak. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Trust or legitimacy is weak"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Change resistance can persist under high trust and legitimacy because of competence or identity loss.", "slug": "resistance_to_change"}], "normalized_requirement": "Trust or legitimacy supporting the change is weak.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Trust or legitimacy supporting the change is weak.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P006-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require an initial adoption event, not resistance without adoption.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The initiating state is adoption of a change by relevant actors.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve adoption-before-outcome ordering.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The branch-specific practice outcome occurs after the initial adoption.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail failure of durable practice rather than successful stabilization.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The adoption does not become stable enacted practice.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail return toward the pre-change behavior after initial adoption.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A complete branch is that actors relapse to the prior practice after adoption.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail an alternate practice used to evade or circumvent the intended change.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "A complete branch is that actors develop a workaround that bypasses the adopted practice.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail surface compliance lacking active or durable enactment.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "A complete branch is that actors comply only passively without integrating the practice.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must make adoption causally productive of the branch outcome rather than merely earlier in time.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "Initial adoption produces or leads into the branch-specific unstable or superficial practice outcome.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Adoption produces relapse, workaround, or passive compliance rather than stable practice.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Initial adoption transitions into a specified unstable or superficial practice outcome instead of durable enactment.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P006-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Status-quo protection need not include an initial adoption followed by relapse.", "slug": "resistance_to_change"}], "residual_id": "r:change_resistance_diagnosis_and_support:b010_a06_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b010_a06_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Adoption produces relapse, workarounds, or passive compliance. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Adoption produces relapse, workarounds, or passive compliance"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Status-quo protection need not include an initial adoption followed by relapse.", "slug": "resistance_to_change"}], "normalized_requirement": "Adoption produces relapse, workaround, or passive compliance rather than stable practice.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Adoption produces relapse, workaround, or passive compliance rather than stable practice.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 10, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-010", "ledger_sha256": "998abef476780c036b71ce06ee46ea93d406f3c1d11cc24bc05ec5708e571939"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Change-Scoped Revalidation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:change_scoped_revalidation", "slug": "change_scoped_revalidation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 1, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system changes locally, but downstream facts, artifacts, decisions, or obligations depend on that state in ways that are costly or impossible to reconsider globally. The organization therefore needs a principled boundary between what must be re-derived and what can continue to be treated as true.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system changes locally, but downstream facts, artifacts, decisions, or obligations depend on that state in ways that are costly or impossible to reconsider globally. The organization therefore needs a principled boundary between what must be re-derived and what can continue to be treated as true."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Changing an interpretive frame is only one possible upstream change.", "slug": "frame_change"}], "residual_id": "r:change_scoped_revalidation:b010_a07_c1", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b010_a07_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A value, rule, relationship, assumption, source, interface, policy, or model version changes. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A value, rule, relationship, assumption, source, interface, policy, or model version changes."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Changing an interpretive frame is only one possible upstream change.", "slug": "frame_change"}], "normalized_requirement": "An upstream value, rule, relation, assumption, source, interface, policy, or model version changes.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "An upstream value, rule, relation, assumption, source, interface, policy, or model version changes.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Declared-actual divergence does not require a derivation dependency between outputs.", "slug": "configuration_drift"}], "residual_id": "r:change_scoped_revalidation:b010_a07_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b010_a07_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Some outputs or commitments are derived from upstream state rather than independently observed. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Some outputs or commitments are derived from upstream state rather than independently observed."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Declared-actual divergence does not require a derivation dependency between outputs.", "slug": "configuration_drift"}], "normalized_requirement": "Some outputs or commitments are derived from upstream state rather than independently observed.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Some outputs or commitments are derived from upstream state rather than independently observed.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A staged filter is a possible solution and need not follow an upstream change.", "slug": "asymmetric_screening"}], "residual_id": "r:change_scoped_revalidation:b010_a07_c3", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b010_a07_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Full recomputation or review is materially costly, slow, disruptive, or cognitively infeasible. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Full recomputation or review is materially costly, slow, disruptive, or cognitively infeasible."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A staged filter is a possible solution and need not follow an upstream change.", "slug": "asymmetric_screening"}], "normalized_requirement": "Full recomputation or review is materially costly, slow, disruptive, or infeasible.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Full recomputation or review is materially costly, slow, disruptive, or infeasible.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P006-C07", "dnf": [], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [], "predicate": "The consequences of missing an affected dependency are nontrivial enough to require a reviewable scope argument.", "resolution": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RESIDUAL", "semantic_scope": "NON_ABSTRACTION", "structural_head": "A missed-dependency consequence crosses the materiality threshold for requiring documented scope review.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P006-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Overextending a claim across contexts does not require change-scoped dependency review.", "slug": "transferability_overclaim"}], "residual_id": "r:change_scoped_revalidation:b010_a07_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b010_a07_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The consequences of missing a dependency are nontrivial enough to require a reviewable scope argument. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The consequences of missing a dependency are nontrivial enough to require a reviewable scope argument."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RECLASSIFIED", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 1, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Overextending a claim across contexts does not require change-scoped dependency review.", "slug": "transferability_overclaim"}], "normalized_requirement": "Missing an affected dependency would have nontrivial consequences requiring an auditable scope argument.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RECLASSIFIED", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later candidate-blind atomization classified this remainder as a threshold, parameter, materiality test, or other non-abstraction rather than a catalog gap."}, "predicate": "Missing an affected dependency would have nontrivial consequences requiring an auditable scope argument.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A baseline state and at least partial dependency evidence are available or can be constructed.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: A baseline state and at least partial dependency evidence are available or can be constructed. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A baseline state and at least partial dependency evidence are available or can be constructed."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "A baseline state and at least partial dependency evidence are available or can be constructed."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 10, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-010", "ledger_sha256": "998abef476780c036b71ce06ee46ea93d406f3c1d11cc24bc05ec5708e571939"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Channel-Fit Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:channel_fit_design", "slug": "channel_fit_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system relies on a channel whose bandwidth, code, timing, trust boundary, noise profile, or receiver context cannot express the distinctions the system needs. The channel may still transmit something, but the missing distinctions are lost, compressed beyond recovery, misread as a different kind of signal, reconstructed through unsafe inference, or displaced into informal side channels.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system relies on a channel whose bandwidth, code, timing, trust boundary, noise profile, or receiver context cannot express the distinctions the system needs. The channel may still transmit something, but the missing distinctions are lost, compressed beyond recovery, misread as a different kind of signal, reconstructed through unsafe inference, or displaced into informal side channels."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires an information-bearing medium transporting signals between loci.", "role_mapping": "Medium -> channel; source and destination -> sender and receiver.", "slug": "channel_capacity", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b010_a08_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A sender, system, instrument, interface, process, or institution must transmit state, meaning, evidence, priority, intent, command, uncertainty, status, or context to a receiver or downstream stage. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A sender, system, instrument, interface, process, or institution must transmit state, meaning, evidence, priority, intent, command, uncertainty, status, or context to a receiver or downstream stage."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Channel Capacity", "one_liner": "Any information-bearing medium has a hard upper bound on reliable throughput that effort cannot exceed.", "page_ref": "prime:channel_capacity", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Medium -> channel; source and destination -> sender and receiver.", "slug": "channel_capacity", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires an information-bearing medium transporting signals between loci."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "An information-bearing medium carries state, meaning, evidence, intent, status, or context from a sender to a receiver.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires finite bandwidth, a noise floor, and a hard reliable-throughput ceiling.", "role_mapping": "Bandwidth/noise -> channel constraint; capacity -> bounded transfer.", "slug": "channel_capacity", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime requires a fixed-capacity representation field sized to an assumed regime.", "role_mapping": "Bounded field -> fixed alphabet or format; capacity boundary -> representation limit.", "slug": "silent_representation_overflow", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b010_a08_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The available channel has bounded capacity, fixed alphabet, restricted format, latency, loss, noise, ordering limits, security boundary, social convention, accessibility limit, or interpretive convention. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The available channel has bounded capacity, fixed alphabet, restricted format, latency, loss, noise, ordering limits, security boundary, social convention, accessibility limit, or interpretive convention."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Channel Capacity", "one_liner": "Any information-bearing medium has a hard upper bound on reliable throughput that effort cannot exceed.", "page_ref": "prime:channel_capacity", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Bandwidth/noise -> channel constraint; capacity -> bounded transfer.", "slug": "channel_capacity", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires finite bandwidth, a noise floor, and a hard reliable-throughput ceiling."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Silent Representation Overflow", "one_liner": "A bounded field silently rolls past its capacity and a blind consumer trusts it.", "page_ref": "prime:silent_representation_overflow", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Bounded field -> fixed alphabet or format; capacity boundary -> representation limit.", "slug": "silent_representation_overflow", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a fixed-capacity representation field sized to an assumed regime."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The available channel has bounded capacity, alphabet, format, latency, loss, noise, ordering, security, accessibility, or interpretive constraints.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Communication below capacity can preserve every decision-relevant distinction.", "slug": "channel_capacity"}], "residual_id": "r:channel_fit_design:b010_a08_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b010_a08_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The receiver must make a decision or take action that depends on distinctions the channel may not preserve. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The receiver must make a decision or take action that depends on distinctions the channel may not preserve."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Communication below capacity can preserve every decision-relevant distinction.", "slug": "channel_capacity"}], "normalized_requirement": "A receiver decision depends on distinctions the channel may fail to preserve.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A receiver decision depends on distinctions the channel may fail to preserve.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A system can explicitly model and respect its capacity ceiling.", "slug": "channel_capacity"}], "residual_id": "r:channel_fit_design:b010_a08_c4", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_AMBIGUITY", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b010_a08_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Current practice treats the channel as a neutral conduit rather than as a design constraint that shapes what can be expressed. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Current practice treats the channel as a neutral conduit rather than as a design constraint that shapes what can be expressed."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A system can explicitly model and respect its capacity ceiling.", "slug": "channel_capacity"}], "normalized_requirement": "Current practice treats the channel as a neutral conduit rather than a design constraint.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_AMBIGUITY", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Current practice treats the channel as a neutral conduit rather than a design constraint.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires silent truncation, wrap, or reuse to corrupt a value trusted by a downstream consumer.", "role_mapping": "Silent crossing -> truncation; remote failure -> unsafe inference or ambiguous status.", "slug": "silent_representation_overflow", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b010_a08_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Failures recur as misunderstanding, overload, silent truncation, degraded signal, ambiguous status, unsafe inference, lost context, duplicated messages, or side-channel workarounds. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Failures recur as misunderstanding, overload, silent truncation, degraded signal, ambiguous status, unsafe inference, lost context, duplicated messages, or side-channel workarounds."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Silent Representation Overflow", "one_liner": "A bounded field silently rolls past its capacity and a blind consumer trusts it.", "page_ref": "prime:silent_representation_overflow", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Silent crossing -> truncation; remote failure -> unsafe inference or ambiguous status.", "slug": "silent_representation_overflow", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires silent truncation, wrap, or reuse to corrupt a value trusted by a downstream consumer."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Failures recur as misunderstanding, overload, truncation, degradation, ambiguity, lost context, duplication, or side-channel workarounds.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Changing the message, code, channel, timing, redundancy, receiver training, or fallback path is feasible enough to improve transfer.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system wants the convenience of a single cheap, fast, familiar channel, while the required transfer may demand capacity, discriminability, timing, redundancy, trust separation, shared code, or contextual richness that the channel does not possess. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: Changing the message, code, channel, timing, redundancy, receiver training, or fallback path is feasible enough to improve transfer. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Changing the message, code, channel, timing, redundancy, receiver training, or fallback path is feasible enough to improve transfer.", "A system wants the convenience of a single cheap, fast, familiar channel, while the required transfer may demand capacity, discriminability, timing, redundancy, trust separation, shared code, or contextual richness that the channel does not possess."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Changing the message, code, channel, timing, redundancy, receiver training, or fallback path is feasible enough to improve transfer."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 10, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-010", "ledger_sha256": "998abef476780c036b71ce06ee46ea93d406f3c1d11cc24bc05ec5708e571939"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Chaos Exposure Testing", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:chaos_exposure_testing", "slug": "chaos_exposure_testing"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Many systems are optimized for ordinary conditions. They appear stable because the conditions that would reveal their weak points have not happened recently. Dependencies remain hidden, recovery paths remain ceremonial, and teams quietly assume that plans will work because they are documented.\n\nThe structural problem is **latent fragility under unexercised disorder**. The system may have backups, procedures, redundancy, or training, but these safeguards are unvalidated. When the real disruption arrives, the system discovers too late that the backup depends on the same failed input, the alert does not show the real bottleneck, the runbook requires missing authority, or the team has never practiced the handoff.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system appears stable under ordinary conditions, but hidden dependencies, brittle coordination paths, untested recovery procedures, or optimistic assumptions may only become visible during disruption."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires calm to manufacture latent fragility by eroding response capability.", "role_mapping": "Quiet window -> ordinary success; latent fragility -> hidden failure exposure.", "slug": "stability_induced_fragility", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b010_a09_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Hidden fragility is plausible. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Hidden fragility is plausible"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Stability-Induced Fragility", "one_liner": "Prolonged calm endogenously erodes the response capacity that stressors keep exercised.", "page_ref": "prime:stability_induced_fragility", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Quiet window -> ordinary success; latent fragility -> hidden failure exposure.", "slug": "stability_induced_fragility", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires calm to manufacture latent fragility by eroding response capability."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A prolonged calm or success history makes latent response fragility plausible.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Uncertain adverse outcomes need not be high-cost system failures.", "slug": "risk"}], "residual_id": "r:chaos_exposure_testing:b010_a09_c2", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b010_a09_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Real failure would be costly. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Real failure would be costly"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Uncertain adverse outcomes need not be high-cost system failures.", "slug": "risk"}], "normalized_requirement": "A real uncontrolled failure would be costly.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A real uncontrolled failure would be costly.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P006-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern routine test conditions rather than all possible testing.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The source role is the system's ordinary testing regime.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern a suspected system fragility, not an arbitrary untested feature.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The target role is a suspected brittle dependency, coordination path, recovery procedure, or assumption.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must connect test conditions to activation of the suspected fragility.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Testing would need to exercise or activate the fragility pathway to evaluate it.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail missing exposure under routine tests rather than successful stress of the pathway.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Ordinary testing does not exercise or activate the suspected fragility pathway.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Ordinary testing does not exercise the suspected fragility pathway.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Routine tests fail to place a suspected brittle dependency or recovery path under the conditions that activate it.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P006-C08-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P006-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern evidence from routine tests rather than absence of all observation.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The source role is the results or observations produced by ordinary testing.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern a brittle dependency, path, procedure, or assumption believed to exist.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The target role is a suspected system fragility.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must connect test evidence to observability of the fragility.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Testing would need to make the suspected fragility visible to evaluators.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail that routine test evidence leaves the fragility hidden.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Ordinary testing does not reveal the suspected fragility.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Ordinary testing does not reveal the suspected fragility.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Routine test results fail to make a suspected system fragility observable.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P006-C08-U2"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Calm-induced fragility can already be visible in ordinary risk models or drills.", "slug": "stability_induced_fragility"}], "residual_id": "r:chaos_exposure_testing:b010_a09_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b010_a09_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Ordinary testing is insufficient. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Ordinary testing is insufficient"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_GUARDED_EQUIVALENT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Given ordinary tests use the perturbing apparatus, retaining the heisenbug signature while exercising or revealing the activation profile is contradictory.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Heisenbug", "one_liner": "Name the software defect whose failure vanishes under observation because attaching a debugger, adding a print, or disabling optimization perturbs the timing window or interleaving it rides on — so disappearance-under-observation is the diagnostic tell, not evidence the bug is gone.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:heisenbug", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1", "O4"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "ordinary_tests_use_perturbing_observation_apparatus", "predicate": "The ordinary test regime uses the observation apparatus that perturbs the defect activation profile.", "rationale": "The candidate supplies every principal role and relation; one atomic context binding fills all remaining gaps without restating the head or selecting a favorable subtype."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "heisenbug"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "ordinary_tests_use_perturbing_observation_apparatus"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "heisenbug", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P006-C08-U1", "why_it_fits": "Authoritative exact-record review confirms retention. Heisenbug supplies the suspected fragility and observation-induced disappearance; one atomic context binding identifies that perturbing apparatus as the ordinary test regime."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_GUARDED_EQUIVALENT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Without the qualifier a complete heisenbug instance can miss the guarded obligation; with the one anchored qualifier, no preserved candidate instance can falsify the selected complete DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Heisenbug", "one_liner": "Name the software defect whose failure vanishes under observation because attaching a debugger, adding a print, or disabling optimization perturbs the timing window or interleaving it rides on — so disappearance-under-observation is the diagnostic tell, not evidence the bug is gone.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:heisenbug", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "routine_test_results_under_perturbing_observation", "predicate": "The routine test results are produced under the perturbing observation apparatus that hides the suspected fragility.", "rationale": "The candidate supplies every principal role and relation; one atomic context binding fills all remaining gaps without restating the head or selecting a favorable subtype."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "heisenbug"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "routine_test_results_under_perturbing_observation"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "heisenbug", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P006-C08-U2", "why_it_fits": "Authoritative exact-record review confirms retention. GUARDED_CONTEXT: record bc97326e2ae01527bce225aacad12ead5132be653f902702540ff0f9a7c7f64b supplies the structural spine and exactly one atomic, anchored qualifier fills all and only the guardable gap."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Ordinary testing does not exercise or reveal the suspected fragility.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Controlled exposure can be bounded.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Chaos Exposure Testing resolves this tension by making exposure bounded, observable, reversible, authorized, and learning-oriented. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: Controlled exposure can be bounded. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Controlled exposure can be bounded", "Chaos Exposure Testing resolves this tension by making exposure bounded, observable, reversible, authorized, and learning-oriented."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Controlled exposure can be bounded"}, {"display_text": "Observation and follow-through are available.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: Observation and follow-through are available. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Observation and follow-through are available"]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Observation and follow-through are available"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 10, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-010", "ledger_sha256": "998abef476780c036b71ce06ee46ea93d406f3c1d11cc24bc05ec5708e571939"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Checkpoint and Rollback", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:checkpoint_and_rollback", "slug": "checkpoint_and_rollback"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is recoverability under change. A system can move from an acceptable state into a new state, but the new state may fail, corrupt hidden dependencies, produce unacceptable side effects, or lose legitimacy. Without a checkpoint, the team may have no clear place to return. Without a trigger, it may argue too long about whether to revert. Without a tested restoration path, the supposed fallback may not work.\n\nThe core tension is that progress requires change, while safety requires an credible route back.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system is about to undergo change, but failure could leave it in an unknown, degraded, unsafe, inconsistent, or politically unacceptable state."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Iterative learning is a response to uncertainty, not the uncertainty condition itself.", "slug": "inquiry_change_learning_loop"}], "residual_id": "r:checkpoint_and_rollback:b010_a10_c1", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b010_a10_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: a change has uncertain effects or uncertain implementation quality. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["a change has uncertain effects or uncertain implementation quality"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Iterative learning is a response to uncertainty, not the uncertainty condition itself.", "slug": "inquiry_change_learning_loop"}], "normalized_requirement": "A proposed change has uncertain effects or implementation quality.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A proposed change has uncertain effects or implementation quality.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Returning to an earlier search state does not require the current operational state to be acceptable.", "slug": "backtracking"}], "residual_id": "r:checkpoint_and_rollback:b010_a10_c2", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b010_a10_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when the current state is imperfect but acceptable, the proposed change is uncertain, and stakeholders need a bounded way to experiment without making every attempted improvement irreversible. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The current state is acceptable enough to preserve before experimentation.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["the current state is acceptable enough to preserve before experimentation", "It is especially useful when the current state is imperfect but acceptable, the proposed change is uncertain, and stakeholders need a bounded way to experiment without making every attempted improvement irreversible."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Returning to an earlier search state does not require the current operational state to be acceptable.", "slug": "backtracking"}], "normalized_requirement": "The current state is acceptable enough to preserve before experimentation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The current state is acceptable enough to preserve before experimentation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A deadline for inexpensive reversal does not require failure to be harmful or diagnostically confusing.", "slug": "reversibility_horizon"}], "residual_id": "r:checkpoint_and_rollback:b010_a10_c3", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b010_a10_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: failure would be costly, confusing, harmful, or hard to diagnose in place. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["failure would be costly, confusing, harmful, or hard to diagnose in place"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A deadline for inexpensive reversal does not require failure to be harmful or diagnostically confusing.", "slug": "reversibility_horizon"}], "normalized_requirement": "Failure would be costly, harmful, confusing, or difficult to diagnose in place.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Failure would be costly, harmful, confusing, or difficult to diagnose in place.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The experiment can cross a defined checkpoint while preserving a verified return path to the acceptable state.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The experiment can cross a defined checkpoint while preserving a verified return path to the acceptable state.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "the system can capture or reconstruct a prior state with acceptable fidelity.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system can move from an acceptable state into a new state, but the new state may fail, corrupt hidden dependencies, produce unacceptable side effects, or lose legitimacy. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: the system can capture or reconstruct a prior state with acceptable fidelity. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["the system can capture or reconstruct a prior state with acceptable fidelity", "A system can move from an acceptable state into a new state, but the new state may fail, corrupt hidden dependencies, produce unacceptable side effects, or lose legitimacy."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "the system can capture or reconstruct a prior state with acceptable fidelity"}, {"display_text": "stakeholders need permission to try a change without making irreversible commitment.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when the current state is imperfect but acceptable, the proposed change is uncertain, and stakeholders need a bounded way to experiment without making every attempted improvement irreversible. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: stakeholders need permission to try a change without making irreversible commitment. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["stakeholders need permission to try a change without making irreversible commitment", "It is especially useful when the current state is imperfect but acceptable, the proposed change is uncertain, and stakeholders need a bounded way to experiment without making every attempted improvement irreversible."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "stakeholders need permission to try a change without making irreversible commitment"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 10, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-010", "ledger_sha256": "998abef476780c036b71ce06ee46ea93d406f3c1d11cc24bc05ec5708e571939"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Checks-and-Balances Architecture", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:checks_and_balances_architecture", "slug": "checks_and_balances_architecture"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is concentrated authority. One actor can decide what the rule means, apply the rule, decide whether the application was valid, control the evidence, and define whether any remedy is available. Even if the actor is competent and sincere, the structure invites self-protection, bias, overreach, hidden mistakes, and legitimacy failure.\n\nCommon symptoms include rubber-stamp review, policy writers acting as sole enforcers and appellate judges, emergency powers that never sunset, review groups dependent on the actors they review, and veto systems that create permanent gridlock.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A single actor, role, unit, or coalition can initiate, execute, interpret, review, enforce, and repair consequential decisions without meaningful independent constraint. Even well-intentioned authority becomes vulnerable to overreach, bias, self-review, capture, hidden error, retaliation, or uncorrected drift."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a recognized scope-bound right to issue binding decisions.", "role_mapping": "Authority holder -> recognized decision locus; decision scope -> governed domain.", "slug": "authority", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b010_a11_c1a", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Concentrated authority. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Concentrated authority"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Authority", "one_liner": "The recognized, legitimate right to issue binding decisions within a defined scope, distinct from raw coercive force or mere persuasive influence.", "page_ref": "prime:authority", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Authority holder -> recognized decision locus; decision scope -> governed domain.", "slug": "authority", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a recognized scope-bound right to issue binding decisions."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A recognized locus holds binding decision authority over the relevant domain.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P006-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern authority that can determine outcomes, not advisory influence alone.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The allocated resource is binding authority over consequential decisions or conduct.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail effective concentration in one decision locus.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The binding authority is concentrated in one actor, role, unit, or coalition locus.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must distinguish genuine independent authorities from subunits controlled by the same locus.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The alternative allocation would place authority among multiple mutually independent loci.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the concentrated-versus-distributed comparison.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Actual authority allocation favors concentration over independent distribution.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail absence of meaningful independent distribution rather than imperfect balance.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Binding authority is not distributed among independent loci.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Binding authority is concentrated rather than distributed among independent loci.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Consequential decision authority is concentrated in one locus instead of divided across independent loci.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P006-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [], "residual_id": "r:checks_and_balances_architecture:b010_a11_c1b", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b010_a11_c1b", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Concentrated authority. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Concentrated authority"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "Binding authority is concentrated rather than distributed among independent loci.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Binding authority is concentrated rather than distributed among independent loci.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A difficult-to-reverse state need not result from concentrated authority.", "slug": "irreversibility"}], "residual_id": "r:checks_and_balances_architecture:b010_a11_c2", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b010_a11_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: High consequence or irreversibility. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["High consequence or irreversibility"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A difficult-to-reverse state need not result from concentrated authority.", "slug": "irreversibility"}], "normalized_requirement": "Errors or abuse in the authority domain have high consequence or irreversibility.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Errors or abuse in the authority domain have high consequence or irreversibility.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P006-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern a decision or enforcement authority, not any self-monitoring system.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The principal actor is an authority capable of consequential conduct.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve identity between the conduct owner and potential assessor.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The assessed conduct was performed, directed, or owned by that same authority.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail structural possibility or risk without requiring completed self-review.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The structure creates risk of self-assessment; actual self-assessment need not already have occurred.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail possible self-review of the authority's conduct.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A complete branch is that the authority risks reviewing its own conduct.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail possible self-validation or self-approval of the authority's conduct.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "A complete branch is that the authority risks validating its own conduct.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "An authority has a structural risk of reviewing or validating its own conduct.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "The same authority that acts can occupy the independent-assessment role for that action.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P006-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A self-checking system can detect its own errors and does not require authority or conflict.", "slug": "self_checking"}], "residual_id": "r:checks_and_balances_architecture:b010_a11_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b010_a11_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Self-review risk. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Self-review risk"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A self-checking system can detect its own errors and does not require authority or conflict.", "slug": "self_checking"}], "normalized_requirement": "The authority has a structural risk of reviewing or validating its own conduct.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The authority has a structural risk of reviewing or validating its own conduct.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a material fact held privately by one party that the other cannot cheaply verify.", "role_mapping": "Informed party -> authority or operator; uninformed party -> checker; verification gap -> oversight asymmetry.", "slug": "information_asymmetry", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b010_a11_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Information asymmetry. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Information asymmetry"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Information Asymmetry", "one_liner": "Parties to an interaction hold unequal private knowledge.", "page_ref": "prime:information_asymmetry", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Informed party -> authority or operator; uninformed party -> checker; verification gap -> oversight asymmetry.", "slug": "information_asymmetry", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a material fact held privately by one party that the other cannot cheaply verify."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Parties to oversight hold materially unequal private information that is costly to verify.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P006-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern a challenger intended to be independent of the authority it constrains.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The affected actor or body occupies an independent challenge or checking role relative to an authority.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail a negative effect on independent challenge rather than ordinary disagreement.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The branch-specific risk can reduce, deter, or suppress exercise of independent challenge.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve possibility or risk rather than require actual universal suppression.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Suppression can occur; the source does not assert that every challenge is already suppressed.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail capture risk as the mechanism threatening independent challenge.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A complete branch is that risk of capture by the authority or an interested party can suppress the challenger.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail anticipated retaliation as the mechanism threatening independent challenge.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "A complete branch is that risk of retaliation for challenging authority can suppress the challenger.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Capture or retaliation risk can suppress independent challenge to authority.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A threat to challenger independence can suppress independent constraint on authority.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P006-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A functioning check architecture need not face capture or retaliation.", "slug": "checks_balances"}], "residual_id": "r:checks_and_balances_architecture:b010_a11_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b010_a11_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Capture or retaliation risk. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Capture or retaliation risk"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A purported complete watchdog-journalism instance with neither an independent challenger nor the exact capture/chilling susceptibility would omit defining structural-signature roles.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Watchdog Journalism", "one_liner": "Model the press as an independent, adversarial monitor of the powerful whose exposures route to voters, regulators, or courts the monitored actor does not control — so its capacity reads off four structural elements and fails through capture or chilling effect.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:watchdog_journalism", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "watchdog_journalism"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "watchdog_journalism", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P006-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record directly supplies the independent challenger, negative suppression effect, possibility modality, and complete capture and retaliation/chilling branches; no qualifier is required."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Capture or retaliation risk can suppress independent challenge.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 10, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-010", "ledger_sha256": "998abef476780c036b71ce06ee46ea93d406f3c1d11cc24bc05ec5708e571939"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Chunked Information Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:chunked_information_design", "slug": "chunked_information_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Information is presented as too many small units, as an undifferentiated mass, or in producer-centered categories that do not match the user's cognitive, task, or retrieval needs. Users expend effort deciding what belongs together before they can understand, remember, or use the content.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Information is presented as too many small units, as an undifferentiated mass, or in producer-centered categories that do not match the user's cognitive, task, or retrieval needs. Users expend effort deciding what belongs together before they can understand, remember, or use the content."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires demand on a finite selection pool to exceed supply and degrade processing.", "role_mapping": "Competing inputs -> information volume; bounded selection pool -> usable attention.", "slug": "attentional_capacity", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b010_a12_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Information volume exceeds usable attention. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Information volume exceeds usable attention"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Attentional Capacity", "one_liner": "Finite pool of selection bandwidth whose exceeded supply degrades processing through interference, slowing, or capture.", "page_ref": "prime:attentional_capacity", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Competing inputs -> information volume; bounded selection pool -> usable attention.", "slug": "attentional_capacity", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires demand on a finite selection pool to exceed supply and degrade processing."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Competing information volume exceeds usable selection bandwidth.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P006-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern small informational elements rather than arbitrary ungrouped objects.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The member entities are fine-grained units of information.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern part-to-chunk organization, not merely labeling individual items.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A grouping relation would organize multiple fine-grained units into meaningful higher-level chunks.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must align grouping with task execution or understanding rather than producer convenience.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Meaningfulness of a grouping is evaluated relative to the user's task level.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail absence of task-aligned chunks rather than merely imperfect chunk size.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The fine-grained units lack such meaningful task-level grouping.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Fine-grained information units lack meaningful task-level grouping.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Small information elements are not organized into higher-level units aligned with the user's task.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P006-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Grouping elements into meaningful units is the missing design rather than the ungrouped condition.", "slug": "chunking"}], "residual_id": "r:chunked_information_design:b010_a12_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b010_a12_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Fine-grained units lack meaningful grouping. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Fine-grained units lack meaningful grouping"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Without the guard, overcoding can be defined against a phenomenon's legibility grain without naming the user's task; with the reconstruction task bound, the exact record cannot preserve overcoding while providing meaningful task-level grouping.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Overcoding", "one_liner": "The qualitative-research failure mode where coding fragments material below the phenomenon's legibility grain, actively severing the sequence and relational structure that gave coded phrases their meaning — diagnosed by whether meaning can be reconstructed from the codes alone.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:overcoding", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O3"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "user_task_requires_phenomenon_reconstruction", "predicate": "The user's task is to reconstruct and act on the qualitative phenomenon's sequence and relational meaning.", "rationale": "The candidate supplies every principal role and relation; one atomic context binding fills all remaining gaps without restating the head or selecting a favorable subtype."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "overcoding"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "user_task_requires_phenomenon_reconstruction"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "overcoding", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P006-C12-U1", "why_it_fits": "Overcoding supplies the fine units, missing higher-grain organization, and reconstruction criterion; the single anchored task-domain guard supplies only the user-task alignment and passes laundering review."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "If the inputs were already represented as task-meaningful clusters, the defining flat hidden-cluster structure of a complete Long Parameter List instance would be absent.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Long Parameter List", "one_liner": "The code smell in which a function requires many separately-supplied inputs at its call boundary because internal complexity was offloaded onto callers — the defect being not the count but hidden co-variation structure that belongs inside the interface.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:long_parameter_list", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "long_parameter_list"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "long_parameter_list", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P006-C12-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record directly entails fine-grained informational inputs, their latent higher-level clusters, caller-task alignment, and the absence of those visible clusters at the interface."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Fine-grained information units lack meaningful task-level grouping.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires an artifact's modular structure to mirror the producer collective's communication topology.", "role_mapping": "Producer graph -> organizational structure; artifact modules -> current information groups.", "slug": "conways_law", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b010_a12_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Current groups reflect producer structure. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Current groups reflect producer structure"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Conway's Law", "one_liner": "Any artifact built by a collective acquires a structure homomorphic to the communication topology of the collective that built it.", "page_ref": "prime:conways_law", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Producer graph -> organizational structure; artifact modules -> current information groups.", "slug": "conways_law", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires an artifact's modular structure to mirror the producer collective's communication topology."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Current group structure reflects producer communication or organization rather than user tasks.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Chunking can be used proactively and does not require observed retrieval failure.", "slug": "chunking"}], "residual_id": "r:chunked_information_design:b010_a12_c4", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b010_a12_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Recall or retrieval is poor after exposure. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Recall or retrieval is poor after exposure"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Chunking can be used proactively and does not require observed retrieval failure.", "slug": "chunking"}], "normalized_requirement": "Recall or retrieval remains poor after exposure.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Recall or retrieval remains poor after exposure.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P006-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern grouped information, not arbitrary categories or physical packages.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The source entities are meaningful chunks that group information units.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require multiple chunk types or instances relevant to action.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "At least two alternative information chunks are distinguished.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must map chunks to action modes, not only to different interpretations.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The destination entities are modes by which downstream actors use or act on the information.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve chunk-before-action ordering.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The action mode is downstream of receiving or recognizing the chunk.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail direction from information grouping to expected action.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Each relevant chunk implies or cues an associated downstream action mode.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail at least two distinct downstream modes rather than one common response.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The action modes associated with alternative chunks are different from one another.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}], "predicate": "Alternative information chunks imply different downstream action modes.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Alternative information chunks imply or cue different downstream action modes.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P006-C13-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A medium of expression need not partition information into action-specific chunks.", "slug": "representational_modality"}], "residual_id": "r:chunked_information_design:b010_a12_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b010_a12_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Different chunks imply different action modes. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Different chunks imply different action modes"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A medium of expression need not partition information into action-specific chunks.", "slug": "representational_modality"}], "normalized_requirement": "Alternative chunks imply different downstream action modes.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Alternative chunks imply different downstream action modes.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 10, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-010", "ledger_sha256": "998abef476780c036b71ce06ee46ea93d406f3c1d11cc24bc05ec5708e571939"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Circuit Breaker", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:circuit_breaker", "slug": "circuit_breaker"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 1 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 1}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Continued connection under a detectable danger state can propagate a local fault or overload into a larger cascade.", "explanation_source": {"field": "diagnostic_head", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Continued connection under a detectable danger state can propagate a local fault or overload into a larger cascade."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "This branch preserves the complete remedy-free diagnostic route; goals, feasibility clauses, gates, deployment constraints, and supporting context remain outside the DNF."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "EXT001-C014", "dnf": [["EXT001-U014-O1"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"obligation_id": "EXT001-U014-O1", "predicate": "A connected flow can propagate a local fault or overload after a detectable danger threshold is crossed."}], "predicate": "A connected flow can propagate a local fault or overload after a detectable danger threshold is crossed.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A connected flow can propagate a local fault or overload after a detectable danger threshold is crossed.", "unit_id": "EXT001-U014"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"catalog_exhaustion": "CONDITION_LEVEL", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: A connected flow can propagate a local fault or overload after a detectable danger threshold is crossed.", "slug": "systemic_risk"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: A connected flow can propagate a local fault or overload after a detectable danger threshold is crossed.", "slug": "percolation"}, {"falls_short_because": "The exact record describes an intervention, control, or achieved configuration rather than a pre-existing situation that necessarily entails the atom.", "slug": "circuit_breaker"}], "residual_id": "EXT001:circuit_breaker:C01", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding."}}, "condition_id": "ext001_circuit_breaker_a01", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored essence_one_line, compression_statement, components fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: A connected flow can propagate a local fault or overload after a detectable danger threshold is crossed.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A connected flow can propagate a local fault or overload after a detectable danger threshold is crossed."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: A connected flow can propagate a local fault or overload after a detectable danger threshold is crossed.", "slug": "systemic_risk"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: A connected flow can propagate a local fault or overload after a detectable danger threshold is crossed.", "slug": "percolation"}, {"falls_short_because": "The exact record describes an intervention, control, or achieved configuration rather than a pre-existing situation that necessarily entails the atom.", "slug": "circuit_breaker"}], "normalized_requirement": "A connected flow can propagate a local fault or overload after a detectable danger threshold is crossed.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A connected flow can propagate a local fault or overload after a detectable danger threshold is crossed.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A bounded local interruption is preferable to the prospective cascade.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored essence_one_line, compression_statement, components fields; the source file was not modified. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: A bounded local interruption is preferable to the prospective cascade. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A bounded local interruption is preferable to the prospective cascade.", "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored essence_one_line, compression_statement, components fields; the source file was not modified."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "A bounded local interruption is preferable to the prospective cascade."}, {"display_text": "The connection can be isolated and later reset under a governed policy.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored essence_one_line, compression_statement, components fields; the source file was not modified. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: The connection can be isolated and later reset under a governed policy. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The connection can be isolated and later reset under a governed policy.", "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored essence_one_line, compression_statement, components fields; the source file was not modified."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "The connection can be isolated and later reset under a governed policy."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"candidate_ledger_sha256": "96f72d2139077fd57bf795048ebef33b3fd574b20963170080ec916b5b3b92fe", "extension_id": "new-archetypes-extension-001", "ledger_id": "prime-production-v1.2-extension-001", "ledger_sha256": "9644520614744632d1d36da44b1acd77ce432852c6083eb871203521c166efce"}, "base_projection_sha256": "841e0c7f3cb8e8054475ad29a8a14745a416b4fc115559a44878b94292e673ec", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "ca09ed9fe1598ce7072755b530de5553f5ee0a7cd64ae82d9e4a4e2149a37788", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Circular Causality Mapping", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:circular_causality_mapping", "slug": "circular_causality_mapping"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 5, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is hidden recurrence. The system’s behavior is generated by closed causal paths, but participants reason as if causes move in one direction and stop. That linear framing encourages symptom fixes, premature blame, and interventions that later become part of the problem.\n\nDelays make the problem harder. A corrective action may not show effects until much later, so actors overcorrect or abandon it. A harmful action may feel successful in the short run while accumulating downstream costs that feed back into the original pressure.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system behavior persists or oscillates because causal influence loops back on itself, but the loop is not explicit."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Return over time does not require repeated attempted fixes.", "slug": "recurrence"}], "residual_id": "r:circular_causality_mapping:b010_a13_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b010_a13_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The same pattern returns after repeated fixes, campaigns, reforms, product changes, or process improvements. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The same pattern returns after repeated fixes, campaigns, reforms, product changes, or process improvements."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Return over time does not require repeated attempted fixes.", "slug": "recurrence"}], "normalized_requirement": "The same pattern returns after repeated fixes or reforms.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The same pattern returns after repeated fixes or reforms.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Forward anticipatory influence lacks the required downstream-to-upstream return path.", "slug": "feedforward"}], "residual_id": "r:circular_causality_mapping:b010_a13_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b010_a13_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Actors explain the pattern with one-way causes, but consequences appear to change incentives, capacity, expectations, or constraints upstream. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Actors explain the pattern with one-way causes, but consequences appear to change incentives, capacity, expectations, or constraints upstream."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Forward anticipatory influence lacks the required downstream-to-upstream return path.", "slug": "feedforward"}], "normalized_requirement": "Consequences feed back to change upstream incentives, capacity, expectations, or constraints.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Consequences feed back to change upstream incentives, capacity, expectations, or constraints.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Repeated variation can have a fully known local mechanism.", "slug": "oscillation"}], "residual_id": "r:circular_causality_mapping:b010_a13_c3", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b010_a13_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The system grows, collapses, oscillates, stabilizes, or resists change in a way that is hard to explain from local events alone. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The system grows, collapses, oscillates, stabilizes, or resists change in a way that is hard to explain from local events alone."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Repeated variation can have a fully known local mechanism.", "slug": "oscillation"}], "normalized_requirement": "Growth, collapse, oscillation, stabilization, or resistance is difficult to explain from local events alone.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Growth, collapse, oscillation, stabilization, or resistance is difficult to explain from local events alone.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Benefit and harm sharing one causal step need not feed back later or reverse the intended effect.", "slug": "intervention_coupled_harm"}], "residual_id": "r:circular_causality_mapping:b010_a13_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b010_a13_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Interventions appear to create side effects that later undermine, amplify, or reverse the intended effect. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Interventions appear to create side effects that later undermine, amplify, or reverse the intended effect."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Benefit and harm sharing one causal step need not feed back later or reverse the intended effect.", "slug": "intervention_coupled_harm"}], "normalized_requirement": "Interventions produce effects that later undermine, amplify, or reverse the intended outcome.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Interventions produce effects that later undermine, amplify, or reverse the intended outcome.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "At least one downstream consequence returns through a closed path to change a causal input to the recurring pattern.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "At least one downstream consequence returns through a closed path to change a causal input to the recurring pattern.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Stakeholders disagree about whether the issue is caused by behavior, incentives, capacity, rules, expectations, or external pressure.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Stakeholders disagree about whether the issue is caused by behavior, incentives, capacity, rules, expectations, or external pressure. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders disagree about whether the issue is caused by behavior, incentives, capacity, rules, expectations, or external pressure."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Stakeholders disagree about whether the issue is caused by behavior, incentives, capacity, rules, expectations, or external pressure."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 10, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-010", "ledger_sha256": "998abef476780c036b71ce06ee46ea93d406f3c1d11cc24bc05ec5708e571939"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Circular-Economy Redesign via LCA", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:circular_economy_redesign_via_lca", "slug": "circular_economy_redesign_via_lca"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A product, process, service, or supply chain consumes inputs and emits wastes across several lifecycle stages, but design decisions are made around local cost, immediate function, or end-of-pipe recycling claims. Without whole-lifecycle evidence, redesign efforts can preserve visible circularity while increasing upstream extraction, use-phase energy, transport, toxicity, failure rates, or disposal burdens.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A product, process, service, or supply chain consumes inputs and emits wastes across several lifecycle stages, but design decisions are made around local cost, immediate function, or end-of-pipe recycling claims. Without whole-lifecycle evidence, redesign efforts can preserve visible circularity while increasing upstream extraction, use-phase energy, transport, toxicity, failure rates, or disposal burdens."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P006-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern lifecycle-distributed impacts rather than arbitrary hidden side effects.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The hidden entities are impacts of a product, process, service, or supply chain occurring across lifecycle stages.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail impacts material enough to affect lifecycle evaluation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The hidden lifecycle impacts are significant rather than negligible.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must specify a local transaction or use vantage rather than an omniscient evaluator.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The observer vantage is limited to the point of sale or current operation.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve whole-lifecycle distribution outside the point observation.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The relevant scope extends beyond the local vantage to upstream, manufacturing, use, recovery, or end-of-life stages.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail local invisibility rather than merely incomplete numerical precision.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The significant distributed impacts are not visible from the sale-or-operation vantage alone.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Significant impacts at lifecycle stages outside the local transaction or operating view are not visible from the point of sale or operation alone.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A local sale-or-operation vantage conceals significant impacts distributed across the lifecycle.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P006-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Lifecycle assessment is the remedy that makes distributed impacts visible.", "slug": "life_cycle_assessment_lca"}], "residual_id": "r:circular_economy_redesign_via_lca:b010_a14_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b010_a14_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The system has significant upstream, manufacturing, use-phase, recovery, or end-of-life impacts that are not visible from the point of sale or operation alone. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The system has significant upstream, manufacturing, use-phase, recovery, or end-of-life impacts that are not visible from the point of sale or operation alone."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Lifecycle assessment is the remedy that makes distributed impacts visible.", "slug": "life_cycle_assessment_lca"}], "normalized_requirement": "Significant lifecycle impacts are invisible from the point of sale or operation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Significant lifecycle impacts are invisible from the point of sale or operation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P006-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern post-use material flow rather than an arbitrary logistics path.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The tracked entity is material remaining after product or process use.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve post-use lifecycle position rather than upstream sourcing.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The relevant pathway begins after the material's initial use phase.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail unresolved routing or outcome for material after use.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A complete branch is that the destination or sequence of the post-use material path is uncertain.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail discontinuity or fragmentation in the post-use material flow.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A complete branch is that the post-use material path is fragmented across disconnected actors or stages.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail insufficient quality for effective recirculation or reuse.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "A complete branch is that recovered material or pathway output is low-quality relative to reuse needs.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail economic unattractiveness of following the post-use material path without requiring any particular comparison baseline.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "A complete branch is that the post-use material pathway is economically unattractive.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "The post-use material path is uncertain, fragmented, low-quality, or economically unattractive.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A material's pathway after use has at least one specified recovery or recirculation defect.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P006-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A lifecycle inventory can be complete even when recovery pathways are clear and valuable.", "slug": "life_cycle_assessment_lca"}], "residual_id": "r:circular_economy_redesign_via_lca:b010_a14_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b010_a14_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The material path after use is uncertain, fragmented, low-quality, or economically unattractive. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The material path after use is uncertain, fragmented, low-quality, or economically unattractive."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A lifecycle inventory can be complete even when recovery pathways are clear and valuable.", "slug": "life_cycle_assessment_lca"}], "normalized_requirement": "The post-use material path is uncertain, fragmented, low-quality, or economically unattractive.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The post-use material path is uncertain, fragmented, low-quality, or economically unattractive.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P007-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require a circularity claim or its claimed circular intervention and a burden that can be relocated.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The source-side subject is a circularity claim and the affected object is a burden.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail burden transfer across scopes, not merely the existence of an external cost.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The circularity claim shifts the burden away from the focal scope to another locus.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the risk or possibility of burden transfer and must not require an already-realized transfer.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The burden shift is possible rather than asserted to have occurred.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must permit cross-boundary burden relocation of the listed general kind rather than only redistribution within one unchanged scope.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The destination can be outside the focal lifecycle phase, region, group, supplier, or impact category.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "A circularity claim may shift burden to another phase, region, group, supplier, or impact category.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "a circularity claim may transfer burden outside its focal scope", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P007-C01-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A third-party spillover does not require burden transfer across lifecycle phases.", "slug": "externality"}], "residual_id": "r:circular_economy_redesign_via_lca:b010_a14_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b010_a14_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A proposed circularity claim could shift burden to another lifecycle phase, region, user group, supplier, or environmental category. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A proposed circularity claim could shift burden to another lifecycle phase, region, user group, supplier, or environmental category."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A third-party spillover does not require burden transfer across lifecycle phases.", "slug": "externality"}], "normalized_requirement": "A circularity claim may shift burden to another phase, region, group, supplier, or impact category.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A circularity claim may shift burden to another phase, region, group, supplier, or impact category.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A team wants to reduce waste, emissions, resource depletion, toxicity, or disposal burden through reuse, repair, recycling, recovery, or substitution.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Without whole-lifecycle evidence, redesign efforts can preserve visible circularity while increasing upstream extraction, use-phase energy, transport, toxicity, failure rates, or disposal burdens. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: A team wants to reduce waste, emissions, resource depletion, toxicity, or disposal burden through reuse, repair, recycling, recovery, or substitution. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A team wants to reduce waste, emissions, resource depletion, toxicity, or disposal burden through reuse, repair, recycling, recovery, or substitution.", "Without whole-lifecycle evidence, redesign efforts can preserve visible circularity while increasing upstream extraction, use-phase energy, transport, toxicity, failure rates, or disposal burdens."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "A team wants to reduce waste, emissions, resource depletion, toxicity, or disposal burden through reuse, repair, recycling, recovery, or substitution."}, {"display_text": "The design can still be changed: materials, architecture, packaging, process energy, logistics, ownership model, recovery channel, or supplier requirements remain adjustable.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "LCA reveals cross-stage consequences, but assessment alone does not close loops; redesign must translate impact evidence into material, structural, operational, and recovery changes. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: The design can still be changed: materials, architecture, packaging, process energy, logistics, ownership model, recovery channel, or supplier requirements remain adjustable. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The design can still be changed: materials, architecture, packaging, process energy, logistics, ownership model, recovery channel, or supplier requirements remain adjustable.", "LCA reveals cross-stage consequences, but assessment alone does not close loops; redesign must translate impact evidence into material, structural, operational, and recovery changes."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The design can still be changed: materials, architecture, packaging, process energy, logistics, ownership model, recovery channel, or supplier requirements remain adjustable."}, {"display_text": "Decision makers can gather at least approximate inventory data and compare alternatives under realistic use and recovery assumptions.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: Decision makers can gather at least approximate inventory data and compare alternatives under realistic use and recovery assumptions. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Decision makers can gather at least approximate inventory data and compare alternatives under realistic use and recovery assumptions."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Decision makers can gather at least approximate inventory data and compare alternatives under realistic use and recovery assumptions."}, {"display_text": "Recovered material, component reuse, repair, remanufacture, or take-back pathways are technically possible or can be developed.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: Recovered material, component reuse, repair, remanufacture, or take-back pathways are technically possible or can be developed. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Recovered material, component reuse, repair, remanufacture, or take-back pathways are technically possible or can be developed."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "Recovered material, component reuse, repair, remanufacture, or take-back pathways are technically possible or can be developed."}, {"display_text": "Stakeholders need evidence that a circularity redesign improves the total system rather than merely improving a single metric.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Without whole-lifecycle evidence, redesign efforts can preserve visible circularity while increasing upstream extraction, use-phase energy, transport, toxicity, failure rates, or disposal burdens. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: Stakeholders need evidence that a circularity redesign improves the total system rather than merely improving a single metric. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders need evidence that a circularity redesign improves the total system rather than merely improving a single metric.", "Without whole-lifecycle evidence, redesign efforts can preserve visible circularity while increasing upstream extraction, use-phase energy, transport, toxicity, failure rates, or disposal burdens."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 8, "text": "Stakeholders need evidence that a circularity redesign improves the total system rather than merely improving a single metric."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 10, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-010", "ledger_sha256": "998abef476780c036b71ce06ee46ea93d406f3c1d11cc24bc05ec5708e571939"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Circulation Loop Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:circulation_loop_design", "slug": "circulation_loop_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is uneven residence time. Some parts of the system hold too much of the payload, hold it too long, or hold it after its value is declining. Other parts lack the payload, miss the signal, do not receive attention, or cannot benefit from available resources. The system may contain enough total supply or knowledge, but it fails because the payload is poorly circulated.\n\nTypical symptoms include stale inventory, overheated rooms, idle equipment, isolated experts, repeated rediscovery of lessons, attention captured by visible crises, and operational knowledge trapped in frontline teams. The common shape is a pool-sink pattern: one area accumulates while another area starves. Without a loop, temporary fixes decay back into the same pattern.\n\nThe root tension is that local holding is not always bad. Locality preserves ownership, context, custody, and stability. The failure comes from excessive local retention, blocked return paths, missing exchange points, or a cadence too slow for the payload's decay rate.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A resource, signal, capability, responsibility, attention stream, or material flow pools in some regions while other regions become depleted, stale, underinformed, overheated, isolated, or neglected."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires coupled source sites with surplus and sink sites with a standing local deficit.", "role_mapping": "Source surplus -> local over-concentration; sink deficit -> absence where needed; payload -> transferred resource.", "slug": "source_sink_habitat", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b010_a15_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A valuable payload exists but is unevenly distributed, trapped, locally over-concentrated, or absent where it is needed. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A valuable payload exists but is unevenly distributed, trapped, locally over-concentrated, or absent where it is needed."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Source-Sink Dynamics", "one_liner": "A system persists across coupled sites with asymmetric net balance: net-producing sources export a surplus that sustains net-consuming sinks which would decline in isolation.", "page_ref": "prime:source_sink_habitat", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source surplus -> local over-concentration; sink deficit -> absence where needed; payload -> transferred resource.", "slug": "source_sink_habitat", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires coupled source sites with surplus and sink sites with a standing local deficit."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A valuable payload is unevenly distributed between net-producing and net-consuming locations.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Component replacement does not require stationary payload decay.", "slug": "turnover"}], "residual_id": "r:circulation_loop_design:b010_a15_c2", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b010_a15_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The payload loses value, freshness, safety, or relevance when it remains in one place too long. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The payload loses value, freshness, safety, or relevance when it remains in one place too long."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Component replacement does not require stationary payload decay.", "slug": "turnover"}], "normalized_requirement": "The payload loses freshness, safety, relevance, or value when stationary too long.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The payload loses freshness, safety, relevance, or value when stationary too long.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a standing directed flow from net-producing sources to sinks that decline in isolation.", "role_mapping": "Persistent source -> new pool; sink deficit -> recurring depleted zone; directed subsidy -> repeated transfer.", "slug": "source_sink_habitat", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b010_a15_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: One-time transfer is insufficient because the system repeatedly generates new pools, depleted zones, stale pockets, or hot spots. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["One-time transfer is insufficient because the system repeatedly generates new pools, depleted zones, stale pockets, or hot spots."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Source-Sink Dynamics", "one_liner": "A system persists across coupled sites with asymmetric net balance: net-producing sources export a surplus that sustains net-consuming sinks which would decline in isolation.", "page_ref": "prime:source_sink_habitat", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Persistent source -> new pool; sink deficit -> recurring depleted zone; directed subsidy -> repeated transfer.", "slug": "source_sink_habitat", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a standing directed flow from net-producing sources to sinks that decline in isolation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Persistent source and sink roles regenerate pools and depleted zones, so one-time transfer is insufficient.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a scalar field with direction and magnitude of change that often drives flow.", "role_mapping": "Scalar field -> need or pressure; gradient direction -> movement guide.", "slug": "gradient", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b010_a15_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: There is a usable gradient such as need, pressure, temperature, workload, attention, expertise, freshness, risk, or surplus that can guide movement. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["There is a usable gradient such as need, pressure, temperature, workload, attention, expertise, freshness, risk, or surplus that can guide movement."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Gradient", "one_liner": "Distribution and change over space/time.", "page_ref": "prime:gradient", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Scalar field -> need or pressure; gradient direction -> movement guide.", "slug": "gradient", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a scalar field with direction and magnitude of change that often drives flow."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A measurable need, pressure, temperature, workload, attention, expertise, freshness, risk, or surplus gradient can guide movement.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The intervention goal is recurring redistribution or refresh rather than simple diffusion, permanent sequestration, or static allocation.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The intervention must move enough of the payload to refresh the system without erasing useful locality or creating churn. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: The intervention goal is recurring redistribution or refresh rather than simple diffusion, permanent sequestration, or static allocation. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The intervention goal is recurring redistribution or refresh rather than simple diffusion, permanent sequestration, or static allocation.", "The intervention must move enough of the payload to refresh the system without erasing useful locality or creating churn."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The intervention goal is recurring redistribution or refresh rather than simple diffusion, permanent sequestration, or static allocation."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 10, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-010", "ledger_sha256": "998abef476780c036b71ce06ee46ea93d406f3c1d11cc24bc05ec5708e571939"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Claim Quantifier Scope Calibration", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:claim_quantifier_scope_calibration", "slug": "claim_quantifier_scope_calibration"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 4, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 5 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 4 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A claim uses a quantifier such as all, no, some, most, usually, every, any, exactly N, at least N, or almost none without a declared domain, measure basis, or burden of support. The same sentence can therefore be interpreted as universal, existential, probabilistic, typicality-based, legal-scope-based, or illustrative. Evidence is then evaluated under the wrong standard: a single example is made to prove a universal, a single counterexample is made to defeat a merely typical claim, “most” is treated as “all,” “some” is smuggled into “many,” or the domain silently expands and contracts as the argument proceeds.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A claim uses a quantifier such as all, no, some, most, usually, every, any, exactly N, at least N, or almost none without a declared domain, measure basis, or burden of support. The same sentence can therefore be interpreted as universal, existential, probabilistic, typicality-based, legal-scope-based, or illustrative. Evidence is then evaluated under the wrong standard: a single example is made to prove a universal, a single counterexample is made to defeat a merely typical claim, “most” is treated as “all,” “some” is smuggled into “many,” or the domain silently expands and contracts as the argument proceeds."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a predicate, domain, and scope operator such as all, some, none, most, or exactly N.", "role_mapping": "Scope operator -> explicit quantifier term; domain -> cases covered by the claim.", "slug": "quantifier", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b011_a01_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A claim contains explicit quantifier terms such as all, every, any, no, none, some, at least one, most, majority, usually, exactly, only, always, or never. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A claim contains explicit quantifier terms such as all, every, any, no, none, some, at least one, most, majority, usually, exactly, only, always, or never."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Quantifier", "one_liner": "Specifies the scope of a claim over a domain — all, some, none, most, or exactly N.", "page_ref": "prime:quantifier", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Scope operator -> explicit quantifier term; domain -> cases covered by the claim.", "slug": "quantifier", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a predicate, domain, and scope operator such as all, some, none, most, or exactly N."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The claim contains an explicit scope quantifier over cases.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A well-formed quantifier requires a determinate domain and therefore does not entail a vague or moving one.", "slug": "quantifier"}], "residual_id": "r:claim_quantifier_scope_calibration:b011_a01_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b011_a01_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The domain of cases is vague, moving, sampled indirectly, or selected after the claim is made. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The domain of cases is vague, moving, sampled indirectly, or selected after the claim is made."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A well-formed quantifier requires a determinate domain and therefore does not entail a vague or moving one.", "slug": "quantifier"}], "normalized_requirement": "The domain of quantified cases is vague, moving, indirectly sampled, or selected after the claim.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The domain of quantified cases is vague, moving, indirectly sampled, or selected after the claim.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Quantifier force fixes an evidence burden but does not require the evidence actually offered to mismatch it.", "slug": "quantifier"}], "residual_id": "r:claim_quantifier_scope_calibration:b011_a01_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b011_a01_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Evidence offered for the claim has a different strength than the quantifier requires. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Evidence offered for the claim has a different strength than the quantifier requires."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Quantifier force fixes an evidence burden but does not require the evidence actually offered to mismatch it.", "slug": "quantifier"}], "normalized_requirement": "The evidence strength does not meet the support burden created by the claim's quantifier.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The evidence strength does not meet the support burden created by the claim's quantifier.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A quantifier fixes a truth condition; merely inviting several possible quantified readings leaves the scope operator unresolved.", "slug": "quantifier"}], "residual_id": "r:claim_quantifier_scope_calibration:b011_a01_c2", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_AMBIGUITY", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b011_a01_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A claim is grammatically unquantified but pragmatically invites a quantified interpretation, such as “X causes Y” or “members of group C do P.” The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A claim is grammatically unquantified but pragmatically invites a quantified interpretation, such as “X causes Y” or “members of group C do P.”"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A quantifier fixes a truth condition; merely inviting several possible quantified readings leaves the scope operator unresolved.", "slug": "quantifier"}], "normalized_requirement": "An unquantified grammatical form invites a quantified interpretation without fixing its force.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_AMBIGUITY", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "An unquantified grammatical form invites a quantified interpretation without fixing its force.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A well-formed quantifier requires a determinate domain and therefore does not entail a vague or moving one.", "slug": "quantifier"}], "residual_id": "r:claim_quantifier_scope_calibration:b011_a01_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b011_a01_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The domain of cases is vague, moving, sampled indirectly, or selected after the claim is made. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The domain of cases is vague, moving, sampled indirectly, or selected after the claim is made."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A well-formed quantifier requires a determinate domain and therefore does not entail a vague or moving one.", "slug": "quantifier"}], "normalized_requirement": "The domain of quantified cases is vague, moving, indirectly sampled, or selected after the claim.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The domain of quantified cases is vague, moving, indirectly sampled, or selected after the claim.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Quantifier force fixes an evidence burden but does not require the evidence actually offered to mismatch it.", "slug": "quantifier"}], "residual_id": "r:claim_quantifier_scope_calibration:b011_a01_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b011_a01_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Evidence offered for the claim has a different strength than the quantifier requires. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Evidence offered for the claim has a different strength than the quantifier requires."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Quantifier force fixes an evidence burden but does not require the evidence actually offered to mismatch it.", "slug": "quantifier"}], "normalized_requirement": "The evidence strength does not meet the support burden created by the claim's quantifier.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The evidence strength does not meet the support burden created by the claim's quantifier.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a predicate, domain, and scope operator such as all, some, none, most, or exactly N.", "role_mapping": "Scope operator -> explicit quantifier term; domain -> cases covered by the claim.", "slug": "quantifier", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b011_a01_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A claim contains explicit quantifier terms such as all, every, any, no, none, some, at least one, most, majority, usually, exactly, only, always, or never. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A claim contains explicit quantifier terms such as all, every, any, no, none, some, at least one, most, majority, usually, exactly, only, always, or never."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Quantifier", "one_liner": "Specifies the scope of a claim over a domain — all, some, none, most, or exactly N.", "page_ref": "prime:quantifier", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Scope operator -> explicit quantifier term; domain -> cases covered by the claim.", "slug": "quantifier", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a predicate, domain, and scope operator such as all, some, none, most, or exactly N."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The claim contains an explicit scope quantifier over cases.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A declared applicability scope need not participate in a cross-domain quantified comparison.", "slug": "applicability_scope"}], "residual_id": "r:claim_quantifier_scope_calibration:b011_a01_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b011_a01_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Claims are compared across different populations, time windows, legal classes, datasets, or ontological domains. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Claims are compared across different populations, time windows, legal classes, datasets, or ontological domains."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A declared applicability scope need not participate in a cross-domain quantified comparison.", "slug": "applicability_scope"}], "normalized_requirement": "Quantified claims are compared across different populations, windows, legal classes, datasets, or ontological domains.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Quantified claims are compared across different populations, windows, legal classes, datasets, or ontological domains.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Quantifier force fixes an evidence burden but does not require the evidence actually offered to mismatch it.", "slug": "quantifier"}], "residual_id": "r:claim_quantifier_scope_calibration:b011_a01_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b011_a01_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Evidence offered for the claim has a different strength than the quantifier requires. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Evidence offered for the claim has a different strength than the quantifier requires."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Quantifier force fixes an evidence burden but does not require the evidence actually offered to mismatch it.", "slug": "quantifier"}], "normalized_requirement": "The evidence strength does not meet the support burden created by the claim's quantifier.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The evidence strength does not meet the support burden created by the claim's quantifier.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A quantifier fixes a truth condition; merely inviting several possible quantified readings leaves the scope operator unresolved.", "slug": "quantifier"}], "residual_id": "r:claim_quantifier_scope_calibration:b011_a01_c2", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_AMBIGUITY", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b011_a01_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A claim is grammatically unquantified but pragmatically invites a quantified interpretation, such as “X causes Y” or “members of group C do P.” The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A claim is grammatically unquantified but pragmatically invites a quantified interpretation, such as “X causes Y” or “members of group C do P.”"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A quantifier fixes a truth condition; merely inviting several possible quantified readings leaves the scope operator unresolved.", "slug": "quantifier"}], "normalized_requirement": "An unquantified grammatical form invites a quantified interpretation without fixing its force.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_AMBIGUITY", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "An unquantified grammatical form invites a quantified interpretation without fixing its force.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A declared applicability scope need not participate in a cross-domain quantified comparison.", "slug": "applicability_scope"}], "residual_id": "r:claim_quantifier_scope_calibration:b011_a01_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b011_a01_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Claims are compared across different populations, time windows, legal classes, datasets, or ontological domains. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Claims are compared across different populations, time windows, legal classes, datasets, or ontological domains."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A declared applicability scope need not participate in a cross-domain quantified comparison.", "slug": "applicability_scope"}], "normalized_requirement": "Quantified claims are compared across different populations, windows, legal classes, datasets, or ontological domains.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Quantified claims are compared across different populations, windows, legal classes, datasets, or ontological domains.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Quantifier force fixes an evidence burden but does not require the evidence actually offered to mismatch it.", "slug": "quantifier"}], "residual_id": "r:claim_quantifier_scope_calibration:b011_a01_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b011_a01_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Evidence offered for the claim has a different strength than the quantifier requires. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Evidence offered for the claim has a different strength than the quantifier requires."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Quantifier force fixes an evidence burden but does not require the evidence actually offered to mismatch it.", "slug": "quantifier"}], "normalized_requirement": "The evidence strength does not meet the support burden created by the claim's quantifier.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The evidence strength does not meet the support burden created by the claim's quantifier.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A counterexample, exception, or missing case is being used to revise the claim’s strength or scope.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Evidence is then evaluated under the wrong standard: a single example is made to prove a universal, a single counterexample is made to defeat a merely typical claim, “most” is treated as “all,” “some” is smuggled into “many,” or the domain silently expands and contracts as the argument proceeds. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: A counterexample, exception, or missing case is being used to revise the claim’s strength or scope. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A counterexample, exception, or missing case is being used to revise the claim’s strength or scope.", "Evidence is then evaluated under the wrong standard: a single example is made to prove a universal, a single counterexample is made to defeat a merely typical claim, “most” is treated as “all,” “some” is smuggled into “many,” or the domain silently expands and contracts as the argument proceeds."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "A counterexample, exception, or missing case is being used to revise the claim’s strength or scope."}, {"display_text": "A downstream system, policy, proof, contract, specification, model, or metric will treat the quantified statement as actionable.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Evidence is then evaluated under the wrong standard: a single example is made to prove a universal, a single counterexample is made to defeat a merely typical claim, “most” is treated as “all,” “some” is smuggled into “many,” or the domain silently expands and contracts as the argument proceeds. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: A downstream system, policy, proof, contract, specification, model, or metric will treat the quantified statement as actionable. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A downstream system, policy, proof, contract, specification, model, or metric will treat the quantified statement as actionable.", "Evidence is then evaluated under the wrong standard: a single example is made to prove a universal, a single counterexample is made to defeat a merely typical claim, “most” is treated as “all,” “some” is smuggled into “many,” or the domain silently expands and contracts as the argument proceeds."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "A downstream system, policy, proof, contract, specification, model, or metric will treat the quantified statement as actionable."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 11, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-011", "ledger_sha256": "a314dcfd0ffa13cda9a0daa8b2f2285c1b49d08f4911b836b1e12e598c429072"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Closure-Preserving Operation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:closure_preserving_operation", "slug": "closure_preserving_operation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 2 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 2}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is domain escape. A process begins in a valid region but is allowed to produce something outside that region. The escape may be technical, such as a malformed data record; operational, such as a machine state outside tolerance; institutional, such as a decision outside authority; or semantic, such as a formally well-shaped output that no longer means what downstream users think it means.\n\nThe deeper tension is that operations transform things. Transformation creates value by changing state, but that same change can cross a boundary into invalidity. A closure-preserving design does not stop transformation. It narrows and governs it so the operation’s result remains usable, safe, authorized, and meaningful.\n\nCommon symptoms include invalid records discovered downstream, automation that produces unofficial categories, manual workarounds around failed validation, exceptions that become normal, and systems that crash or improvise when an edge case appears.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A process, transformation, policy, or operation can produce states outside the permitted, valid, safe, or meaningful domain."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Closure has the opposite polarity: every admissible operation output remains in the carrier.", "slug": "closure"}], "residual_id": "r:closure_preserving_operation:b011_a02_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b011_a02_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Valid inputs can still lead to invalid outputs after transformation. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Valid inputs can still lead to invalid outputs after transformation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Closure has the opposite polarity: every admissible operation output remains in the carrier.", "slug": "closure"}], "normalized_requirement": "A transformation admits valid inputs whose outputs fall outside the valid carrier.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A transformation admits valid inputs whose outputs fall outside the valid carrier.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The permitted carrier, designated operation, and failure response are jointly under-specified so a valid input can escape the carrier without a typed failure.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The permitted carrier, designated operation, and failure response are jointly under-specified so a valid input can escape the carrier without a typed failure.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Downstream systems assume that received outputs are already valid.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when downstream users assume the output is already valid. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Downstream systems assume that received outputs are already valid. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Downstream systems assume that received outputs are already valid.", "It is especially useful when downstream users assume the output is already valid."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "Downstream systems assume that received outputs are already valid."}, {"display_text": "The valid domain is known but only informally enforced.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A process, transformation, policy, or operation can produce states outside the permitted, valid, safe, or meaningful domain. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The valid domain is known but only informally enforced. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The valid domain is known but only informally enforced.", "A process, transformation, policy, or operation can produce states outside the permitted, valid, safe, or meaningful domain."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "The valid domain is known but only informally enforced."}, {"display_text": "Invalid results must not be silently coerced into apparently valid results.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when a system can take apparently acceptable inputs and still produce an unsafe, invalid, unauthorized, malformed, or meaningless output. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: Invalid results must not be silently coerced into apparently valid results. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Invalid results must not be silently coerced into apparently valid results.", "Use this archetype when a system can take apparently acceptable inputs and still produce an unsafe, invalid, unauthorized, malformed, or meaningless output."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Invalid results must not be silently coerced into apparently valid results."}, {"display_text": "External pressure rewards producing an answer even when no valid in-domain answer exists.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A process, transformation, policy, or operation can produce states outside the permitted, valid, safe, or meaningful domain. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: External pressure rewards producing an answer even when no valid in-domain answer exists. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["External pressure rewards producing an answer even when no valid in-domain answer exists.", "A process, transformation, policy, or operation can produce states outside the permitted, valid, safe, or meaningful domain."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "External pressure rewards producing an answer even when no valid in-domain answer exists."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 11, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-011", "ledger_sha256": "a314dcfd0ffa13cda9a0daa8b2f2285c1b49d08f4911b836b1e12e598c429072"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Co-Activation Coupling Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:co_activation_coupling_design", "slug": "co_activation_coupling_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system needs certain units, signals, concepts, actions, memories, roles, or features to become linked through experience. The link is formed locally and cumulatively from repeated joint activation rather than from a centralized explanation, reward, or explicit mapping. Without design, the desired association may never consolidate; or worse, repeated incidental co-occurrence may strengthen an irrelevant, biased, addictive, brittle, or unsafe association.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system needs certain units, signals, concepts, actions, memories, roles, or features to become linked through experience. The link is formed locally and cumulatively from repeated joint activation rather than from a centralized explanation, reward, or explicit mapping. Without design, the desired association may never consolidate; or worse, repeated incidental co-occurrence may strengthen an irrelevant, biased, addictive, brittle, or unsafe association."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime definitionally uses a local, correlational, unsupervised update driven only by endpoint activity and existing weight.", "role_mapping": "Endpoints -> units; joint activity -> co-occurrence signal; local update -> coupling change.", "slug": "hebbian_learning", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b011_a03_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The update process is local or semi-local: co-occurrence itself is a major signal, rather than only externally supplied reward or supervision. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The update process is local or semi-local: co-occurrence itself is a major signal, rather than only externally supplied reward or supervision."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Hebbian Learning", "one_liner": "A connection between two units strengthens as a function of their correlated activity, through a local, correlational, unsupervised, cumulative update.", "page_ref": "prime:hebbian_learning", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Endpoints -> units; joint activity -> co-occurrence signal; local update -> coupling change.", "slug": "hebbian_learning", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime definitionally uses a local, correlational, unsupervised update driven only by endpoint activity and existing weight."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Connection strength is updated locally from endpoint co-occurrence rather than an external reward or teacher signal.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Hebbian updating requires correlated repeated activity but does not universally require spacing, context, and intensity all to be strong moderators.", "slug": "hebbian_learning"}], "residual_id": "r:co_activation_coupling_design:b011_a03_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b011_a03_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Timing, spacing, repetition, context, and intensity strongly affect whether the association forms. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Timing, spacing, repetition, context, and intensity strongly affect whether the association forms."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Hebbian updating requires correlated repeated activity but does not universally require spacing, context, and intensity all to be strong moderators.", "slug": "hebbian_learning"}], "normalized_requirement": "Timing, spacing, repetition, context, and intensity jointly have strong effects on association formation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Timing, spacing, repetition, context, and intensity jointly have strong effects on association formation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires an adapting system to substitute a cheap incidental correlate for the intended structure, producing localized brittleness when the correlation breaks.", "role_mapping": "Incidental correlate -> biased co-occurrence; substituted feature -> harmful shortcut; distribution shift -> false dependency exposure.", "slug": "shortcut_learning", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b011_a03_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Accidental or biased co-occurrence could create a harmful shortcut, stereotype, false dependency, or misleading relation. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Accidental or biased co-occurrence could create a harmful shortcut, stereotype, false dependency, or misleading relation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Shortcut Learning", "one_liner": "An adapting system replaces the structure it was meant to learn with a cheaper incidental feature that correlates with success on its training distribution, and collapses sharply once that correlation breaks.", "page_ref": "prime:shortcut_learning", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Incidental correlate -> biased co-occurrence; substituted feature -> harmful shortcut; distribution shift -> false dependency exposure.", "slug": "shortcut_learning", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires an adapting system to substitute a cheap incidental correlate for the intended structure, producing localized brittleness when the correlation breaks."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Incidental or biased co-occurrence can install a harmful shortcut or false dependency.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a bounding mechanism because pure cumulative coactivation is positive feedback that otherwise runs away.", "role_mapping": "Bounding mechanism -> decay, competition, pruning, or normalization.", "slug": "hebbian_learning", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b011_a03_c5a", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The system has capacity limits, so unused or invalid links must decay, compete, or be pruned. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The system has capacity limits, so unused or invalid links must decay, compete, or be pruned."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Hebbian Learning", "one_liner": "A connection between two units strengthens as a function of their correlated activity, through a local, correlational, unsupervised, cumulative update.", "page_ref": "prime:hebbian_learning", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Bounding mechanism -> decay, competition, pruning, or normalization.", "slug": "hebbian_learning", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a bounding mechanism because pure cumulative coactivation is positive feedback that otherwise runs away."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A cumulative local coupling update requires decay, competition, normalization, or another bound against runaway strengthening.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P007-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O4", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O4", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern links or connections that occupy or contend for a system's connection capacity.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The affected item is a link in a system with connection capacity.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require bounded connection capacity rather than an unconstrained pool.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The system's connection capacity is limited.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this status branch, the candidate must require a link that is not in use.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A complete status branch is that the affected link is unused.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this status branch, the candidate must require a link that is invalid for the system's purposes or rules.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A complete status branch is that the affected link is invalid.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this response branch, the candidate must make link decay necessary because connection capacity is limited.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "A complete response branch is that the capacity limit requires the affected link to decay.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this response branch, the candidate must make competition for connection capacity necessary because that capacity is limited.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "A complete response branch is that the capacity limit requires the affected link to compete.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this response branch, the candidate must make pruning of the link necessary because connection capacity is limited.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "A complete response branch is that the capacity limit requires the affected link to be pruned.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "The system has capacity limits, so unused or invalid links must decay, compete, or be pruned.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "capacity limits require unused or invalid links to decay, compete, or be pruned", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P007-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A Hebbian bound prevents runaway weights but need not be justified by a finite count of links or removal of unused links.", "slug": "hebbian_learning"}], "residual_id": "r:co_activation_coupling_design:b011_a03_c5b", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b011_a03_c5b", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The system has capacity limits, so unused or invalid links must decay, compete, or be pruned. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The system has capacity limits, so unused or invalid links must decay, compete, or be pruned."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A Hebbian bound prevents runaway weights but need not be justified by a finite count of links or removal of unused links.", "slug": "hebbian_learning"}], "normalized_requirement": "Unused or invalid links consume a limited connection capacity and therefore must be removed.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Unused or invalid links consume a limited connection capacity and therefore must be removed.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Two or more units should reliably recruit, predict, prime, support, or stabilize one another after repeated exposure.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: Two or more units should reliably recruit, predict, prime, support, or stabilize one another after repeated exposure. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Two or more units should reliably recruit, predict, prime, support, or stabilize one another after repeated exposure."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "Two or more units should reliably recruit, predict, prime, support, or stabilize one another after repeated exposure."}, {"display_text": "A designer can influence exposure order, pairing, context gates, feedback traces, update rules, or tests of transfer.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: A designer can influence exposure order, pairing, context gates, feedback traces, update rules, or tests of transfer. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A designer can influence exposure order, pairing, context gates, feedback traces, update rules, or tests of transfer."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "A designer can influence exposure order, pairing, context gates, feedback traces, update rules, or tests of transfer."}, {"display_text": "The target behavior is not simply to map an existing relation but to change the ease with which one unit activates another later.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: The target behavior is not simply to map an existing relation but to change the ease with which one unit activates another later. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The target behavior is not simply to map an existing relation but to change the ease with which one unit activates another later."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "The target behavior is not simply to map an existing relation but to change the ease with which one unit activates another later."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 11, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-011", "ledger_sha256": "a314dcfd0ffa13cda9a0daa8b2f2285c1b49d08f4911b836b1e12e598c429072"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Coarse-Graining", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:coarse_graining", "slug": "coarse_graining"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 2, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 2 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is micro-detail overload. The system contains more elements than the actor can inspect, simulate, govern, or communicate. Yet the answer is not simply to average everything together, because some differences and interactions remain consequential.\n\nCoarse-Graining responds to a tension between two bad extremes. At one extreme, the representation carries so much detail that macro behavior is invisible or computationally impossible. At the other, the representation becomes so broad that it erases heterogeneity, flow, risk, and causality. The archetype creates a middle level where macro reasoning becomes possible while important structure remains visible.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system contains too many fine-grained elements, states, events, agents, variables, or local differences for direct reasoning, yet a simple aggregate would erase structure that matters. The actor needs a macro representation that is simpler than the raw system but not blind to the behavior of interest."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A chosen grain can be matched or mismatched at any element count and therefore does not entail infeasibility.", "slug": "grain_of_analysis"}], "residual_id": "r:coarse_graining:b011_a04_c1", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b011_a04_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The number of micro elements makes direct analysis, simulation, governance, or communication infeasible. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The number of micro elements makes direct analysis, simulation, governance, or communication infeasible."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A chosen grain can be matched or mismatched at any element count and therefore does not entail infeasibility.", "slug": "grain_of_analysis"}], "normalized_requirement": "The number of micro-elements makes direct analysis, simulation, governance, or communication infeasible.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The number of micro-elements makes direct analysis, simulation, governance, or communication infeasible.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A grain relation need not be too fine or obscure a macro pattern; it can already be correctly matched.", "slug": "grain_of_analysis"}], "residual_id": "r:coarse_graining:b011_a04_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b011_a04_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A macro pattern is suspected but remains hidden by local variation and detail noise. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A macro pattern is suspected but remains hidden by local variation and detail noise."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A grain relation need not be too fine or obscure a macro pattern; it can already be correctly matched.", "slug": "grain_of_analysis"}], "normalized_requirement": "A suspected macro pattern is obscured by local variation and detail noise.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A suspected macro pattern is obscured by local variation and detail noise.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A chosen grain can be matched or mismatched at any element count and therefore does not entail infeasibility.", "slug": "grain_of_analysis"}], "residual_id": "r:coarse_graining:b011_a04_c1", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b011_a04_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The number of micro elements makes direct analysis, simulation, governance, or communication infeasible. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The number of micro elements makes direct analysis, simulation, governance, or communication infeasible."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A chosen grain can be matched or mismatched at any element count and therefore does not entail infeasibility.", "slug": "grain_of_analysis"}], "normalized_requirement": "The number of micro-elements makes direct analysis, simulation, governance, or communication infeasible.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The number of micro-elements makes direct analysis, simulation, governance, or communication infeasible.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Partition dependence makes an aggregate vary with its cells but does not require the current summary to erase a decision-important relation.", "slug": "partition_dependence_of_aggregates"}], "residual_id": "r:coarse_graining:b011_a04_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b011_a04_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Existing summaries are too broad and hide important interactions or subgroup differences. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Existing summaries are too broad and hide important interactions or subgroup differences."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Partition dependence makes an aggregate vary with its cells but does not require the current summary to erase a decision-important relation.", "slug": "partition_dependence_of_aggregates"}], "normalized_requirement": "Existing summaries are so broad that they erase important interactions or subgroup differences.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Existing summaries are so broad that they erase important interactions or subgroup differences.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The system must be modeled at a higher level while preserving contact, flow, dependency, or feedback structure.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The archetype creates a middle level where macro reasoning becomes possible while important structure remains visible. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: The system must be modeled at a higher level while preserving contact, flow, dependency, or feedback structure. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The system must be modeled at a higher level while preserving contact, flow, dependency, or feedback structure.", "The archetype creates a middle level where macro reasoning becomes possible while important structure remains visible."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The system must be modeled at a higher level while preserving contact, flow, dependency, or feedback structure."}, {"display_text": "Stakeholders need a tractable representation but cannot safely discard all low-level detail.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Do not use this archetype when the decision legally, ethically, or technically requires individual-level detail. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: Stakeholders need a tractable representation but cannot safely discard all low-level detail. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders need a tractable representation but cannot safely discard all low-level detail.", "Do not use this archetype when the decision legally, ethically, or technically requires individual-level detail."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Stakeholders need a tractable representation but cannot safely discard all low-level detail."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 11, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-011", "ledger_sha256": "a314dcfd0ffa13cda9a0daa8b2f2285c1b49d08f4911b836b1e12e598c429072"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Coarse-to-Fine Search", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:coarse_to_fine_search", "slug": "coarse_to_fine_search"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 3 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is the tension between **coverage** and **depth**. A broad search protects against tunnel vision but is too shallow to decide well. A fine-grained search gives richer evidence but cannot be applied to every possibility. Without a staged resolution strategy, teams either waste detailed effort on low-value options or use coarse screens as if they were final judgments.\n\nThe common failure is not just inefficiency. It is also invisibility: once a region is filtered out, nobody can tell whether it was genuinely low value, merely poorly represented by the coarse model, or never considered seriously.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "The solution, diagnosis, design, or search space is too large for detailed evaluation of every possibility, but crude screening alone risks missing important options."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A large search space need not have exponential independent-dimensional volume or a nearness-method collapse.", "slug": "curse_of_dimensionality"}], "residual_id": "r:coarse_to_fine_search:b011_a05_c1", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b011_a05_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The number of possible options, regions, hypotheses, designs, or parameter settings is too large for full fine-grained evaluation. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The number of possible options, regions, hypotheses, designs, or parameter settings is too large for full fine-grained evaluation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A large search space need not have exponential independent-dimensional volume or a nearness-method collapse.", "slug": "curse_of_dimensionality"}], "normalized_requirement": "The option, region, hypothesis, design, or parameter space is too large for exhaustive fine-grained evaluation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The option, region, hypothesis, design, or parameter space is too large for exhaustive fine-grained evaluation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires an authoritative downstream check that is too expensive to run on every item.", "role_mapping": "Expensive authoritative check -> detailed evaluation; population stream -> search candidates.", "slug": "asymmetric_screening", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b011_a05_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Detailed evaluation is expensive, slow, scarce, risky, or attention-intensive. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Detailed evaluation is expensive, slow, scarce, risky, or attention-intensive."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Asymmetric Screening", "one_liner": "A cheap, deliberately one-sided-error filter gates an expensive authoritative check.", "page_ref": "prime:asymmetric_screening", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Expensive authoritative check -> detailed evaluation; population stream -> search candidates.", "slug": "asymmetric_screening", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires an authoritative downstream check that is too expensive to run on every item."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Authoritative detailed evaluation is expensive, slow, scarce, risky, or attention-intensive.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P007-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must apply to a search space or a subtype-preserving space of possibilities.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The structured object is a search space containing candidate possibilities.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require internal organization of the search space, not merely a large set of candidates.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The search space is organized into refinable internal structures.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail that the structure enables selective refinement of chosen regions or groups.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "That organization permits selected portions to be refined without refining the whole space.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "The search space has neighborhoods, categories, scales, branches, stages, or families that permit selective refinement.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "a search space has internal structure that enables selective refinement", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P007-C04-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A query and traversal strategy need not expose a hierarchy that supports coarse-to-fine refinement.", "slug": "search_and_retrieval"}], "residual_id": "r:coarse_to_fine_search:b011_a05_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b011_a05_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The search space has structure: neighborhoods, categories, scales, branches, stages, or candidate families that can be refined selectively. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The search space has structure: neighborhoods, categories, scales, branches, stages, or candidate families that can be refined selectively."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A query and traversal strategy need not expose a hierarchy that supports coarse-to-fine refinement.", "slug": "search_and_retrieval"}], "normalized_requirement": "The search space has neighborhoods, categories, scales, branches, stages, or families that permit selective refinement.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The search space has neighborhoods, categories, scales, branches, stages, or families that permit selective refinement.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "There is a lower-resolution representation that can cheaply preserve at least some signal about where detail is worth adding.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when the search space is too large for detailed review of everything, but a cheaper representation can still reveal where deeper investigation should go. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: There is a lower-resolution representation that can cheaply preserve at least some signal about where detail is worth adding. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["There is a lower-resolution representation that can cheaply preserve at least some signal about where detail is worth adding.", "Use this archetype when the search space is too large for detailed review of everything, but a cheaper representation can still reveal where deeper investigation should go."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "There is a lower-resolution representation that can cheaply preserve at least some signal about where detail is worth adding."}, {"display_text": "Early precise analysis would create false precision, sunk-cost bias, or premature commitment to a few cases.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is weak when the early representation is arbitrary, when the cost of missing an option is unacceptable, or when rules require full detailed review before any exclusion. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Early precise analysis would create false precision, sunk-cost bias, or premature commitment to a few cases. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Early precise analysis would create false precision, sunk-cost bias, or premature commitment to a few cases.", "It is weak when the early representation is arbitrary, when the cost of missing an option is unacceptable, or when rules require full detailed review before any exclusion."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Early precise analysis would create false precision, sunk-cost bias, or premature commitment to a few cases."}, {"display_text": "Missing a promising region is possible, so the coarse filter needs an audit, exception, or backtracking mechanism.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is also invisibility: once a region is filtered out, nobody can tell whether it was genuinely low value, merely poorly represented by the coarse model, or never considered seriously. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: Missing a promising region is possible, so the coarse filter needs an audit, exception, or backtracking mechanism. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Missing a promising region is possible, so the coarse filter needs an audit, exception, or backtracking mechanism.", "It is also invisibility: once a region is filtered out, nobody can tell whether it was genuinely low value, merely poorly represented by the coarse model, or never considered seriously."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Missing a promising region is possible, so the coarse filter needs an audit, exception, or backtracking mechanism."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 11, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-011", "ledger_sha256": "a314dcfd0ffa13cda9a0daa8b2f2285c1b49d08f4911b836b1e12e598c429072"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Code / Register Adaptation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:code_register_adaptation", "slug": "code_register_adaptation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 2, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 3, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 2 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a mismatch between the message’s communicative form and the audience’s interpretive conditions. The issue is not necessarily that the sender is wrong. The source message may be accurate, but it is encoded in vocabulary, tone, genre, formality, or community assumptions that block uptake.\n\nThis mismatch has two sides. First, the audience may not have access to the code: technical terms, acronyms, institutional shorthand, unfamiliar idioms, or specialist frames. Second, the code or register may carry social signals: authority, condescension, solidarity, distance, insider status, outsider status, or disrespect. A message can fail because people do not understand it, but it can also fail because the language tells them they are not the intended participants.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A message uses the wrong language, jargon, tone, formality, symbolic code, or community vocabulary for its audience, causing exclusion, mistrust, misunderstanding, loss of precision, or failed coordination."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P007-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require a communication object and distinct audience-side contexts.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The transferred object is a message intended to pass between audience contexts.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail cross-boundary communication, not merely variation within one unchanged audience context.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The message crosses from one audience context across a meaningful boundary to another.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must place the crossing in an audience-context domain and not only a physical or network boundary.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The separating boundary is a difference in audience expertise, language, role, culture, status, age, community, disability context, institution, or a comparable audience attribute.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve that the message must cross the boundary, not merely that a crossing happens or is possible.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Cross-boundary transmission of the message is required.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "A message must cross an expertise, language, role, culture, status, age, community, disability, or institutional boundary.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "a message must cross an audience-context boundary", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P007-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Register shifting can respond to formality, genre, or setting within one audience and therefore does not require a message to cross the stated boundary.", "slug": "register_style_shifting"}], "residual_id": "r:code_register_adaptation:b011_a06_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b011_a06_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A message must cross expertise, language, role, culture, status, age, community, disability, or institutional boundaries. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A message must cross expertise, language, role, culture, status, age, community, disability, or institutional boundaries."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "I attempted to preserve a complete intercultural-communication instance without a message crossing an audience-context boundary, but distinct cultural frames exchanging the same surface form make that impossible.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Intercultural Communication", "one_liner": "The field and practice of managing communicative exchange between parties operating from distinct cultural frames, diagnosing where the same surface utterance carries different presuppositions and repairing the gap below the words that translation alone cannot close.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:intercultural_communication", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "intercultural_communication"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "intercultural_communication", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P007-C06-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record necessarily concerns communicative exchange of a message between parties in distinct cultural frames, a source-listed subtype of audience-context boundary crossing."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A message crosses an expertise, language, role, culture, status, age, community, disability, or institutional boundary.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Register shifting can occur without a shared goal or an existing participant mismatch.", "slug": "register_style_shifting"}], "residual_id": "r:code_register_adaptation:b011_a06_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b011_a06_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Participants share a goal but not the same vocabulary, formality expectations, or interpretive frame. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Participants share a goal but not the same vocabulary, formality expectations, or interpretive frame."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Register shifting can occur without a shared goal or an existing participant mismatch.", "slug": "register_style_shifting"}], "normalized_requirement": "Participants share a goal but differ in vocabulary, formality expectations, or interpretive frame.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Participants share a goal but differ in vocabulary, formality expectations, or interpretive frame.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P007-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require a message and the audience for whom it is intended.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A message is directed to an intended audience.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve technical correctness and cannot explain the failure by factual or technical error.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The message is technically correct despite the audience failure.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must require absence of audience trust in the technically correct message.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A complete branch is that the intended audience does not trust the message.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must require failure of audience understanding despite technical correctness.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A complete branch is that the intended audience does not understand the message.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must require that the technically correct message lacks a usable basis, instruction, or affordance for action by the intended audience; observed audience non-action is not required.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "A complete branch is that the message is not actionable for the intended audience.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "A technically correct message is not trusted, understood, or actionable for its intended audience.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "a technically correct message fails an intended audience", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P007-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A relational encoding defect need not involve audience register, trust, or technical correctness.", "slug": "representational_structure_mismatch"}], "residual_id": "r:code_register_adaptation:b011_a06_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b011_a06_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A message is technically correct but is not trusted, understood, or actionable for the intended audience. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A message is technically correct but is not trusted, understood, or actionable for the intended audience."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "I attempted to preserve a complete error-message-opacity instance in which the correctly fired message was actionable, but the exact record defines the defect by missing cause, context, next action, and escalation.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Error-Message Opacity", "one_liner": "Diagnose the post-failure interface defect where a system correctly detects and announces a fault but the message omits the repair-supporting content — cause, context, next action, escalation — so the user is told they are stuck without being told how to get unstuck.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:error_message_opacity", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "error_message_opacity"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "error_message_opacity", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P007-C07-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record directly instantiates the DNF branch where a technically correct message reaches its user but lacks actionable recovery content."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A technically correct message is not trusted, understood, or actionable for its intended audience.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P007-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O9"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require a communication register and the audience context against which it fits or mismatches.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A message register is evaluated relative to its audience context.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail an audience-relative register mismatch, not merely use of a distinctive style.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The register is wrong or mismatched for the audience context.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the would-signal conditional and must not require an already-observed audience response.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The selected signal would follow conditionally from use of the wrong register.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must connect audience-register mismatch to a signal of disrespect.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A complete branch is that the wrong register would signal disrespect.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must connect audience-register mismatch to a signal of condescension.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "A complete branch is that the wrong register would signal condescension.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must connect audience-register mismatch to a signal of excessive relational distance.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "A complete branch is that the wrong register would signal excessive distance.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must connect audience-register mismatch to a signal of unwarranted intimacy.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "A complete branch is that the wrong register would signal false intimacy.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must connect audience-register mismatch to a signal of unseriousness.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "A complete branch is that the wrong register would signal unseriousness.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must connect audience-register mismatch to a signal of exclusion.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "A complete branch is that the wrong register would signal exclusion.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "The wrong register would signal disrespect, condescension, excessive distance, false intimacy, unseriousness, or exclusion.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "audience-register mismatch would signal one of six specified relational meanings", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P007-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A context-sensitive register change need not begin from or produce a harmful relational signal.", "slug": "register_style_shifting"}], "residual_id": "r:code_register_adaptation:b011_a06_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b011_a06_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The wrong register would signal disrespect, condescension, excessive distance, false intimacy, unseriousness, or exclusion. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The wrong register would signal disrespect, condescension, excessive distance, false intimacy, unseriousness, or exclusion."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A context-sensitive register change need not begin from or produce a harmful relational signal.", "slug": "register_style_shifting"}], "normalized_requirement": "A mismatched register would signal disrespect, condescension, distance, false intimacy, unseriousness, or exclusion.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A mismatched register would signal disrespect, condescension, distance, false intimacy, unseriousness, or exclusion.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P007-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require a communication object and distinct audience-side contexts.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The transferred object is a message intended to pass between audience contexts.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail cross-boundary communication, not merely variation within one unchanged audience context.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The message crosses from one audience context across a meaningful boundary to another.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must place the crossing in an audience-context domain and not only a physical or network boundary.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The separating boundary is a difference in audience expertise, language, role, culture, status, age, community, disability context, institution, or a comparable audience attribute.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve that the message must cross the boundary, not merely that a crossing happens or is possible.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Cross-boundary transmission of the message is required.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "A message must cross an expertise, language, role, culture, status, age, community, disability, or institutional boundary.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "a message must cross an audience-context boundary", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P007-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Register shifting can respond to formality, genre, or setting within one audience and therefore does not require a message to cross the stated boundary.", "slug": "register_style_shifting"}], "residual_id": "r:code_register_adaptation:b011_a06_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b011_a06_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A message must cross expertise, language, role, culture, status, age, community, disability, or institutional boundaries. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A message must cross expertise, language, role, culture, status, age, community, disability, or institutional boundaries."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "I attempted to preserve a complete intercultural-communication instance without a message crossing an audience-context boundary, but distinct cultural frames exchanging the same surface form make that impossible.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Intercultural Communication", "one_liner": "The field and practice of managing communicative exchange between parties operating from distinct cultural frames, diagnosing where the same surface utterance carries different presuppositions and repairing the gap below the words that translation alone cannot close.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:intercultural_communication", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "intercultural_communication"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "intercultural_communication", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P007-C06-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record necessarily concerns communicative exchange of a message between parties in distinct cultural frames, a source-listed subtype of audience-context boundary crossing."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A message crosses an expertise, language, role, culture, status, age, community, disability, or institutional boundary.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P007-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require one shared channel and multiple audience groups, not separate channels for each group.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A single communication channel serves two or more audiences.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must relate the single channel to each audience through a service or communication function.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The same channel serves all of the audiences.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must require a material difference in background knowledge among the audiences.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A complete branch is that the audiences differ in background knowledge.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must require a material difference in stakes among the audiences.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A complete branch is that the audiences differ in stakes.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the must-serve constraint and not merely state that one channel happens to reach multiple audiences.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Use of the single shared channel to serve the audiences is required.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "One channel must serve multiple audiences with different background knowledge or stakes.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "one communication channel must serve audiences differing in background knowledge or stakes", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P007-C08-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A common medium bridges incompatible systems but need not serve audiences with different knowledge or stakes.", "slug": "common_medium_intermediation"}], "residual_id": "r:code_register_adaptation:b011_a06_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b011_a06_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: One communication channel must serve multiple audiences with different background knowledge or stakes. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["One communication channel must serve multiple audiences with different background knowledge or stakes."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "I attempted to preserve context collapse while denying one required shared channel serving heterogeneous audiences, but the exact record defines collapse by that forced co-presence and single utterance.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Context Collapse", "one_liner": "The communication condition in which multiple audiences with irreconcilable norms are co-present in one channel, so a single utterance cannot satisfy all at once — a structural failure of the channel, not the speaker's judgment.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:context_collapse", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "context_collapse"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "context_collapse", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P007-C08-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every context-collapse instance forces one channel and one utterance to serve multiple audiences with distinct shared-knowledge frameworks, directly satisfying the background-knowledge branch."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "One channel must serve multiple audiences with different background knowledge or stakes.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P007-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require a message and the audience for whom it is intended.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A message is directed to an intended audience.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve technical correctness and cannot explain the failure by factual or technical error.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The message is technically correct despite the audience failure.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must require absence of audience trust in the technically correct message.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A complete branch is that the intended audience does not trust the message.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must require failure of audience understanding despite technical correctness.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A complete branch is that the intended audience does not understand the message.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must require that the technically correct message lacks a usable basis, instruction, or affordance for action by the intended audience; observed audience non-action is not required.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "A complete branch is that the message is not actionable for the intended audience.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "A technically correct message is not trusted, understood, or actionable for its intended audience.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "a technically correct message fails an intended audience", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P007-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A relational encoding defect need not involve audience register, trust, or technical correctness.", "slug": "representational_structure_mismatch"}], "residual_id": "r:code_register_adaptation:b011_a06_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b011_a06_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A message is technically correct but is not trusted, understood, or actionable for the intended audience. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A message is technically correct but is not trusted, understood, or actionable for the intended audience."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "I attempted to preserve a complete error-message-opacity instance in which the correctly fired message was actionable, but the exact record defines the defect by missing cause, context, next action, and escalation.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Error-Message Opacity", "one_liner": "Diagnose the post-failure interface defect where a system correctly detects and announces a fault but the message omits the repair-supporting content — cause, context, next action, escalation — so the user is told they are stuck without being told how to get unstuck.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:error_message_opacity", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "error_message_opacity"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "error_message_opacity", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P007-C07-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record directly instantiates the DNF branch where a technically correct message reaches its user but lacks actionable recovery content."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A technically correct message is not trusted, understood, or actionable for its intended audience.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P007-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O9"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require a communication register and the audience context against which it fits or mismatches.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A message register is evaluated relative to its audience context.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail an audience-relative register mismatch, not merely use of a distinctive style.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The register is wrong or mismatched for the audience context.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the would-signal conditional and must not require an already-observed audience response.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The selected signal would follow conditionally from use of the wrong register.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must connect audience-register mismatch to a signal of disrespect.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A complete branch is that the wrong register would signal disrespect.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must connect audience-register mismatch to a signal of condescension.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "A complete branch is that the wrong register would signal condescension.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must connect audience-register mismatch to a signal of excessive relational distance.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "A complete branch is that the wrong register would signal excessive distance.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must connect audience-register mismatch to a signal of unwarranted intimacy.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "A complete branch is that the wrong register would signal false intimacy.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must connect audience-register mismatch to a signal of unseriousness.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "A complete branch is that the wrong register would signal unseriousness.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must connect audience-register mismatch to a signal of exclusion.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "A complete branch is that the wrong register would signal exclusion.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "The wrong register would signal disrespect, condescension, excessive distance, false intimacy, unseriousness, or exclusion.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "audience-register mismatch would signal one of six specified relational meanings", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P007-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A context-sensitive register change need not begin from or produce a harmful relational signal.", "slug": "register_style_shifting"}], "residual_id": "r:code_register_adaptation:b011_a06_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b011_a06_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The wrong register would signal disrespect, condescension, excessive distance, false intimacy, unseriousness, or exclusion. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The wrong register would signal disrespect, condescension, excessive distance, false intimacy, unseriousness, or exclusion."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A context-sensitive register change need not begin from or produce a harmful relational signal.", "slug": "register_style_shifting"}], "normalized_requirement": "A mismatched register would signal disrespect, condescension, distance, false intimacy, unseriousness, or exclusion.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A mismatched register would signal disrespect, condescension, distance, false intimacy, unseriousness, or exclusion.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 11, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-011", "ledger_sha256": "a314dcfd0ffa13cda9a0daa8b2f2285c1b49d08f4911b836b1e12e598c429072"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Coercive Leverage Governance", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:coercive_leverage_governance", "slug": "coercive_leverage_governance"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A target actor can choose an action or restraint that imposes unacceptable risk, harm, noncompliance, or strategic disadvantage, while persuasion, ordinary incentives, or direct physical blocking are unavailable, insufficient, too slow, or less legitimate than consequence-backed choice pressure.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A target actor can choose an action or restraint that imposes unacceptable risk, harm, noncompliance, or strategic disadvantage, while persuasion, ordinary incentives, or direct physical blocking are unavailable, insufficient, too slow, or less legitimate than consequence-backed choice pressure."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a calculating target whose formally available refusal is bent by repricing its options.", "role_mapping": "Calculating target -> target actor; preserved refusal -> retained agency.", "slug": "coercion", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime requires a target able to perform or refuse a demanded positive act under continuing pressure.", "role_mapping": "Target -> actor; visible compliance -> consequential choice.", "slug": "compellence", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b011_a07_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A target actor retains agency over a consequential choice and can plausibly comply, abstain, withdraw, or negotiate. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A target actor retains agency over a consequential choice and can plausibly comply, abstain, withdraw, or negotiate."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Coercion", "one_liner": "Shaping another agent's choice by manipulating the costs and threats attached to their options, so the agent itself 'chooses' the coercer's preferred action — the common parent of forcing an action (compellence) and forcing restraint (deterrence).", "page_ref": "prime:coercion", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Calculating target -> target actor; preserved refusal -> retained agency.", "slug": "coercion", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a calculating target whose formally available refusal is bent by repricing its options."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Compellence", "one_liner": "Imposing ongoing costs to force a positive action and keeping them live until compliance — the action-demanding counterpart to deterrence, structurally harder because compliance is publicly visible and deadline-bound.", "page_ref": "prime:compellence", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Target -> actor; visible compliance -> consequential choice.", "slug": "compellence", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a target able to perform or refuse a demanded positive act under continuing pressure."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A target retains a consequential choice and can comply, refuse, abstain, withdraw, or negotiate.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a cost-imposing actor with a credible threat or penalty conditional on the target's option.", "role_mapping": "Coercer -> influencing actor; manipulated option cost -> conditional consequence.", "slug": "coercion", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime requires continuing pressure held live until a target-recognizable release condition is met.", "role_mapping": "Continuing pressure -> consequence; release condition -> behavior contingency.", "slug": "compellence", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b011_a07_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The influencing actor has or can create a credible consequence tied to the target's action, inaction, or restraint. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The influencing actor has or can create a credible consequence tied to the target's action, inaction, or restraint."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Coercion", "one_liner": "Shaping another agent's choice by manipulating the costs and threats attached to their options, so the agent itself 'chooses' the coercer's preferred action — the common parent of forcing an action (compellence) and forcing restraint (deterrence).", "page_ref": "prime:coercion", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Coercer -> influencing actor; manipulated option cost -> conditional consequence.", "slug": "coercion", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a cost-imposing actor with a credible threat or penalty conditional on the target's option."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Compellence", "one_liner": "Imposing ongoing costs to force a positive action and keeping them live until compliance — the action-demanding counterpart to deterrence, structurally harder because compliance is publicly visible and deadline-bound.", "page_ref": "prime:compellence", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Continuing pressure -> consequence; release condition -> behavior contingency.", "slug": "compellence", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires continuing pressure held live until a target-recognizable release condition is met."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "An influencing actor can impose a credible consequence conditional on the target's action, inaction, or restraint.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a positive demand, recognizable release condition, and publicly observable compliance.", "role_mapping": "Positive demand -> desired behavior; visible release -> verification.", "slug": "compellence", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b011_a07_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The desired behavior can be stated clearly enough to verify compliance or noncompliance. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The desired behavior can be stated clearly enough to verify compliance or noncompliance."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Compellence", "one_liner": "Imposing ongoing costs to force a positive action and keeping them live until compliance — the action-demanding counterpart to deterrence, structurally harder because compliance is publicly visible and deadline-bound.", "page_ref": "prime:compellence", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Positive demand -> desired behavior; visible release -> verification.", "slug": "compellence", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a positive demand, recognizable release condition, and publicly observable compliance."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The demanded behavior is explicit enough for compliance or noncompliance to be observed.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Coercion preserves formal refusal but can leave no meaningful outside option beyond bearing the threatened cost.", "slug": "coercion"}], "residual_id": "r:coercive_leverage_governance:b011_a07_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b011_a07_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The target has meaningful alternatives, outside options, or escalation paths that must be modeled. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The target has meaningful alternatives, outside options, or escalation paths that must be modeled."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Coercion preserves formal refusal but can leave no meaningful outside option beyond bearing the threatened cost.", "slug": "coercion"}], "normalized_requirement": "The target has meaningful alternatives, outside options, or escalation paths that must be modeled.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The target has meaningful alternatives, outside options, or escalation paths that must be modeled.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a threatened freedom to generate a restoring motivation and defiant or boomerang response.", "role_mapping": "Threat to freedom -> coercive restriction; autonomy assertion -> resistance.", "slug": "reactance", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b011_a07_c6a", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Unbounded pressure would create legitimacy loss, resistance, retaliation, evasion, or collateral harm. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Unbounded pressure would create legitimacy loss, resistance, retaliation, evasion, or collateral harm."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Reactance", "one_liner": "Resistance to constraints.", "page_ref": "prime:reactance", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Threat to freedom -> coercive restriction; autonomy assertion -> resistance.", "slug": "reactance", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a threatened freedom to generate a restoring motivation and defiant or boomerang response."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Coercive restriction can provoke autonomy-restoring resistance against the imposed position.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P007-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require pressure whose intensity, scope, duration, or use is unbounded.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The applied pressure lacks effective bounds.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the would-create conditional and cannot satisfy it with an unrelated generic risk.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The selected consequence would follow conditionally from the unbounded pressure.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must connect unbounded pressure to loss of legitimacy.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A complete branch is that unbounded pressure would cause legitimacy loss.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must connect unbounded pressure to resistance by an affected actor or group.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A complete branch is that unbounded pressure would cause resistance.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must connect unbounded pressure to retaliatory response.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "A complete branch is that unbounded pressure would cause retaliation.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must connect unbounded pressure to avoidance or evasion.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "A complete branch is that unbounded pressure would cause evasion.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must connect unbounded pressure to harm outside its intended target or objective.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "A complete branch is that unbounded pressure would cause collateral harm.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Unbounded pressure would create legitimacy loss, resistance, retaliation, evasion, or collateral harm.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "unbounded pressure would create a specified counterproductive or collateral consequence", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P007-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Compellence can be bounded and successful without producing these failure consequences.", "slug": "compellence"}], "residual_id": "r:coercive_leverage_governance:b011_a07_c6b", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b011_a07_c6b", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Unbounded pressure would create legitimacy loss, resistance, retaliation, evasion, or collateral harm. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Unbounded pressure would create legitimacy loss, resistance, retaliation, evasion, or collateral harm."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Compellence can be bounded and successful without producing these failure consequences.", "slug": "compellence"}], "normalized_requirement": "Unbounded pressure can create legitimacy loss, retaliation, evasion, or collateral harm.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Unbounded pressure can create legitimacy loss, retaliation, evasion, or collateral harm.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The objective is important enough to justify pressure but not so urgent that only immediate containment or direct blocking is viable.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A target actor can choose an action or restraint that imposes unacceptable risk, harm, noncompliance, or strategic disadvantage, while persuasion, ordinary incentives, or direct physical blocking are unavailable, insufficient, too slow, or less legitimate than consequence-backed choice pressure. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The objective is important enough to justify pressure but not so urgent that only immediate containment or direct blocking is viable. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The objective is important enough to justify pressure but not so urgent that only immediate containment or direct blocking is viable.", "A target actor can choose an action or restraint that imposes unacceptable risk, harm, noncompliance, or strategic disadvantage, while persuasion, ordinary incentives, or direct physical blocking are unavailable, insufficient, too slow, or less legitimate than consequence-backed choice pressure."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "The objective is important enough to justify pressure but not so urgent that only immediate containment or direct blocking is viable."}, {"display_text": "The coercive relationship must be explainable to reviewers, affected parties, or future maintainers.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this deployment constraint: The coercive relationship must be explainable to reviewers, affected parties, or future maintainers. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The coercive relationship must be explainable to reviewers, affected parties, or future maintainers."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "The coercive relationship must be explainable to reviewers, affected parties, or future maintainers."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 11, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-011", "ledger_sha256": "a314dcfd0ffa13cda9a0daa8b2f2285c1b49d08f4911b836b1e12e598c429072"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Coevolutionary Response-Coupling Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:coevolutionary_response_coupling_design", "slug": "coevolutionary_response_coupling_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system is changing in response to another adaptive system, while the other system is simultaneously changing in response to it. If each side is managed as if the environment were fixed, adaptations become stale, incentives misfire, arms races escalate, mutualistic relationships become exploitative, and strategies optimize against a world they themselves have already changed.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system is changing in response to another adaptive system, while the other system is simultaneously changing in response to it. If each side is managed as if the environment were fixed, adaptations become stale, incentives misfire, arms races escalate, mutualistic relationships become exploitative, and strategies optimize against a world they themselves have already changed."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime is reciprocal, mutually selective adaptation between coupled systems.", "role_mapping": "Adaptive party A/B -> the two systems; reciprocal adaptation -> mutual response.", "slug": "coevolution", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b011_a08_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Reciprocal adaptation is present. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Reciprocal adaptation is present"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Coevolution", "one_liner": "Reciprocal, mutually-selective adaptation between coupled systems.", "page_ref": "prime:coevolution", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Adaptive party A/B -> the two systems; reciprocal adaptation -> mutual response.", "slug": "coevolution", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime is reciprocal, mutually selective adaptation between coupled systems."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Two or more persistent systems adapt reciprocally to one another.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires each party to deform the other's fitness landscape, closing the counter-adaptation loop.", "role_mapping": "Fitness landscape -> selection environment; deformation -> reciprocal change.", "slug": "coevolution", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b011_a08_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Each side changes the other side’s selection environment. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Each side changes the other side’s selection environment"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Coevolution", "one_liner": "Reciprocal, mutually-selective adaptation between coupled systems.", "page_ref": "prime:coevolution", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Fitness landscape -> selection environment; deformation -> reciprocal change.", "slug": "coevolution", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires each party to deform the other's fitness landscape, closing the counter-adaptation loop."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Each side's adaptation changes the other side's selection environment.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Feedback closure, rather than parallel response to a third factor, is the prime's diagnostic invariant.", "role_mapping": "Adaptation -> response; counter-adaptation -> returned feedback.", "slug": "coevolution", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b011_a08_c3a", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Feedback and latency matter. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Feedback and latency matter"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Coevolution", "one_liner": "Reciprocal, mutually-selective adaptation between coupled systems.", "page_ref": "prime:coevolution", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Adaptation -> response; counter-adaptation -> returned feedback.", "slug": "coevolution", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Feedback closure, rather than parallel response to a third factor, is the prime's diagnostic invariant."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Adaptation closes through a response-and-counterresponse feedback loop.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Coevolution can be mutualistic or diversifying and need not escalate or lock in.", "slug": "coevolution"}], "residual_id": "r:coevolutionary_response_coupling_design:b011_a08_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b011_a08_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Escalation or lock-in is plausible. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Escalation or lock-in is plausible"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Coevolution can be mutualistic or diversifying and need not escalate or lock in.", "slug": "coevolution"}], "normalized_requirement": "The reciprocal trajectory can escalate or lock both sides into a narrow path.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The reciprocal trajectory can escalate or lock both sides into a narrow path.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires mutually entangled adaptive trajectories in which neither side faces a fixed environment.", "role_mapping": "Entangled trajectories -> joint outcomes; paired adapters -> both sides.", "slug": "coevolution", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b011_a08_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Joint outcomes matter. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Joint outcomes matter"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Coevolution", "one_liner": "Reciprocal, mutually-selective adaptation between coupled systems.", "page_ref": "prime:coevolution", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Entangled trajectories -> joint outcomes; paired adapters -> both sides.", "slug": "coevolution", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires mutually entangled adaptive trajectories in which neither side faces a fixed environment."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Outcomes are jointly determined by the coupled adaptive trajectories rather than either side alone.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 11, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-011", "ledger_sha256": "a314dcfd0ffa13cda9a0daa8b2f2285c1b49d08f4911b836b1e12e598c429072"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Cognitive Apprenticeship Modeling", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:cognitive_apprenticeship_modeling", "slug": "cognitive_apprenticeship_modeling"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 4 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is an **access gap between expert cognition and novice perception**. Experts act using compressed patterns: cues, schemas, heuristics, exceptions, risk judgments, and repair strategies. Novices see the external action but not the internal discrimination. They may know what happened without understanding why it was the right move.\n\nThis creates brittle learning. The learner copies a solution path, a phrase, a checklist sequence, or a mentor style, but fails when the context changes. Worse, expertise can become mystified: the expert appears naturally gifted, and the learner concludes that the skill cannot be learned.\n\nCognitive Apprenticeship Modeling addresses this by changing what is observable. The expert's reasoning becomes part of the learning environment, not a private background process.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Novices can observe expert outputs or follow stated procedures, but the cues, mental models, tradeoff judgments, exceptions, and self-corrections that produce expert performance remain hidden."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P007-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include a performable capability and a cognition-related prerequisite role.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "There is a target capability whose performance can depend on a cognitive function.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail a prerequisite or dependence relation, not merely frequent co-occurrence with expert thought.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Successful exercise of the capability depends on contextual expert cognition.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must place the prerequisite in contextual or adaptive cognition rather than purely mechanical execution.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The required cognition concerns judgment, cues, diagnosis, interpretation, timing, prioritization, adaptation, or a comparable non-routine activity.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "The capability depends on judgment, cue recognition, diagnosis, interpretation, timing, prioritization, or adaptive strategy.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "a capability depends on contextual expert cognition", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P007-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Implicit knowledge can support competent performance without requiring this listed family of judgment tasks.", "slug": "implicit_knowledge"}], "residual_id": "r:cognitive_apprenticeship_modeling:b011_a09_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b011_a09_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The target capability depends on judgment, cue recognition, diagnosis, interpretation, timing, prioritization, or adaptive strategy. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The target capability depends on judgment, cue recognition, diagnosis, interpretation, timing, prioritization, or adaptive strategy."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Implicit knowledge can support competent performance without requiring this listed family of judgment tasks.", "slug": "implicit_knowledge"}], "normalized_requirement": "The capability depends on judgment, cue recognition, diagnosis, interpretation, timing, prioritization, or adaptive strategy.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The capability depends on judgment, cue recognition, diagnosis, interpretation, timing, prioritization, or adaptive strategy.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P007-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include learners and their actual imitation of a procedure.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Learners perform or imitate a set of procedural steps.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the contrast between successful step imitation and absent situational reasoning.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Procedural imitation is present despite missing conditional explanation.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must require inability to explain the reason the imitated procedure fits the situation, not merely inability to identify when it applies.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A complete branch is that learners cannot explain why the steps fit the situation.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must require inability to identify conditions calling for procedural adaptation.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A complete branch is that learners cannot explain when the steps should be changed.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Learners can imitate steps but cannot explain why the steps fit the situation or when to change them.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "procedural imitation lacks rationale or adaptation knowledge", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P007-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Cognitive apprenticeship is the remedy that exposes reasoning and coaches adaptation, not the learner failure itself.", "slug": "cognitive_apprenticeship"}], "residual_id": "r:cognitive_apprenticeship_modeling:b011_a09_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b011_a09_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Learners can imitate steps but cannot explain why the steps fit the situation or when to change them. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Learners can imitate steps but cannot explain why the steps fit the situation or when to change them."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Cognitive apprenticeship is the remedy that exposes reasoning and coaches adaptation, not the learner failure itself.", "slug": "cognitive_apprenticeship"}], "normalized_requirement": "Learners can imitate procedural steps but cannot explain when those steps fit or when to change them.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Learners can imitate procedural steps but cannot explain when those steps fit or when to change them.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires competent automatic performance paired with an articulation gap and indirect extractability.", "role_mapping": "Competent performer -> expert; articulation gap -> tacit compressed reasoning.", "slug": "implicit_knowledge", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b011_a09_c3a", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Experts are available, but their reasoning is tacit, compressed, automatic, or hard to codify in ordinary instructions. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Experts are available, but their reasoning is tacit, compressed, automatic, or hard to codify in ordinary instructions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Implicit Knowledge", "one_liner": "Unconscious understanding.", "page_ref": "prime:implicit_knowledge", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Competent performer -> expert; articulation gap -> tacit compressed reasoning.", "slug": "implicit_knowledge", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires competent automatic performance paired with an articulation gap and indirect extractability."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Expert performance depends on reasoning that is tacit, compressed, automatic, or difficult to articulate directly.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P007-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include learners, a target capability, and an exposure-producing instructional activity or artifact.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An instructional format exposes learners to a target practice or capability.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail realized exposure, not merely availability of instruction.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The instructional format has produced exposure to the target practice.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require absence of independent performance after exposure.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Independent performance has not resulted from the exposure.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the exposure-without-performance contrast rather than a general training shortfall.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Exposure is present while independent capability is absent.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Shadowing, lectures, job aids, or examples have produced exposure without independent performance.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "instructional exposure fails to produce independent performance", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P007-C13-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The full method includes modeled reasoning, coaching, scaffolding, articulation, reflection, and fading rather than passive exposure alone.", "slug": "cognitive_apprenticeship"}], "residual_id": "r:cognitive_apprenticeship_modeling:b011_a09_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b011_a09_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Shadowing, lectures, job aids, or examples have produced exposure without independent performance. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Shadowing, lectures, job aids, or examples have produced exposure without independent performance."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The full method includes modeled reasoning, coaching, scaffolding, articulation, reflection, and fading rather than passive exposure alone.", "slug": "cognitive_apprenticeship"}], "normalized_requirement": "Shadowing, lectures, job aids, or examples have produced exposure without independent performance.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Shadowing, lectures, job aids, or examples have produced exposure without independent performance.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The organization needs to transfer craft, professional, clinical, operational, design, debugging, or decision expertise across people.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The system must transfer expertise that is embodied in expert perception and judgment, but fully codifying that expertise can be impossible, misleading, or too burdensome. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: The organization needs to transfer craft, professional, clinical, operational, design, debugging, or decision expertise across people. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The organization needs to transfer craft, professional, clinical, operational, design, debugging, or decision expertise across people.", "The system must transfer expertise that is embodied in expert perception and judgment, but fully codifying that expertise can be impossible, misleading, or too burdensome."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The organization needs to transfer craft, professional, clinical, operational, design, debugging, or decision expertise across people."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 11, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-011", "ledger_sha256": "a314dcfd0ffa13cda9a0daa8b2f2285c1b49d08f4911b836b1e12e598c429072"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Cognitive Load Reduction", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:cognitive_load_reduction", "slug": "cognitive_load_reduction"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 6, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 6 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a mismatch between task demands and usable human cognitive capacity. The task may be valid in its content, but the current representation, order, interface, or workflow asks the person to remember too much, infer too much, search too much, switch contexts too often, or choose among too many poorly distinguished options.\n\nThis problem often hides behind individual-blame language: users are “careless,” learners “do not pay attention,” patients “do not follow instructions,” or operators “skip steps.” Cognitive Load Reduction asks whether the system is demanding unnecessary mental work before it asks people to try harder.\n\nThe root tension is that complex tasks need enough information to remain accurate and accountable, but humans cannot process unlimited information at once. Good design does not pretend the task is simple. It makes the complexity available in a usable structure.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "The task, system, explanation, interface, or decision process may be feasible in principle, but the way it is presented or ordered exceeds the cognitive capacity available in the moment. People must remember too much, infer too much, search too much, switch contexts too often, or distinguish too many competing signals before they can perform the core task."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Decision fatigue can degrade choice quality without causing abandonment, and the task need not be important.", "slug": "decision_fatigue"}], "residual_id": "r:cognitive_load_reduction:b011_a10_c1", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b011_a10_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when capable people are failing, avoiding, delaying, or misjudging because the task is cognitively overloaded. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: People avoid or abandon an otherwise important task.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["People avoid or abandon an otherwise important task.", "Use this archetype when capable people are failing, avoiding, delaying, or misjudging because the task is cognitively overloaded."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Decision fatigue can degrade choice quality without causing abandonment, and the task need not be important.", "slug": "decision_fatigue"}], "normalized_requirement": "People avoid or abandon an otherwise important task.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "People avoid or abandon an otherwise important task.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires competing inputs drawing on a bounded selection pool, with degradation when demand exceeds supply.", "role_mapping": "Competing inputs -> simultaneous task demands; selection pool -> available cognitive bandwidth.", "slug": "attentional_capacity", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b011_a10_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The task requires many simultaneous memory, interpretation, or decision demands. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The task requires many simultaneous memory, interpretation, or decision demands."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Attentional Capacity", "one_liner": "Finite pool of selection bandwidth whose exceeded supply degrades processing through interference, slowing, or capture.", "page_ref": "prime:attentional_capacity", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Competing inputs -> simultaneous task demands; selection pool -> available cognitive bandwidth.", "slug": "attentional_capacity", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires competing inputs drawing on a bounded selection pool, with degradation when demand exceeds supply."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A task imposes many simultaneous memory, interpretation, selection, or decision demands.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Decision fatigue can degrade choice quality without causing abandonment, and the task need not be important.", "slug": "decision_fatigue"}], "residual_id": "r:cognitive_load_reduction:b011_a10_c1", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b011_a10_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when capable people are failing, avoiding, delaying, or misjudging because the task is cognitively overloaded. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: People avoid or abandon an otherwise important task.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["People avoid or abandon an otherwise important task.", "Use this archetype when capable people are failing, avoiding, delaying, or misjudging because the task is cognitively overloaded."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Decision fatigue can degrade choice quality without causing abandonment, and the task need not be important.", "slug": "decision_fatigue"}], "normalized_requirement": "People avoid or abandon an otherwise important task.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "People avoid or abandon an otherwise important task.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P007-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must apply to presentation of complex information in a task context.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Complex information is presented to a task performer or decision maker.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require absence of task-relevant grouping in the presentation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Task-relevant grouping is absent from the presentation.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require absence of task-relevant sequencing in the presentation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Task-relevant sequence is absent from the presentation.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require absence of examples that support performance of the task.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Task-relevant examples are absent from the presentation.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require that the presentation fails to expose the task's relevant current state.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Relevant task state is not visible in the presentation.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Complex information is presented without task-relevant grouping, sequence, examples, or visible state.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "complex information is presented without all four named task supports", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P007-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Chunking is one remedy; its presence does not entail that the current presentation lacks every listed support.", "slug": "chunking"}], "residual_id": "r:cognitive_load_reduction:b011_a10_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b011_a10_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Complex information is presented without grouping, sequence, examples, or visible state. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Complex information is presented without grouping, sequence, examples, or visible state."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Chunking is one remedy; its presence does not entail that the current presentation lacks every listed support.", "slug": "chunking"}], "normalized_requirement": "Complex information is presented without task-relevant grouping, sequence, examples, or visible state.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Complex information is presented without task-relevant grouping, sequence, examples, or visible state.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Decision fatigue can degrade choice quality without causing abandonment, and the task need not be important.", "slug": "decision_fatigue"}], "residual_id": "r:cognitive_load_reduction:b011_a10_c1", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b011_a10_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when capable people are failing, avoiding, delaying, or misjudging because the task is cognitively overloaded. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: People avoid or abandon an otherwise important task.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["People avoid or abandon an otherwise important task.", "Use this archetype when capable people are failing, avoiding, delaying, or misjudging because the task is cognitively overloaded."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Decision fatigue can degrade choice quality without causing abandonment, and the task need not be important.", "slug": "decision_fatigue"}], "normalized_requirement": "People avoid or abandon an otherwise important task.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "People avoid or abandon an otherwise important task.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires an extended decision sequence to deplete cognitive resources and degrade decisions over time.", "role_mapping": "Decision sequence -> deciding under load; depleted state -> cognitive fatigue.", "slug": "decision_fatigue", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime requires sustained cognitive-resource consumption to degrade capacity and performance until restoration.", "role_mapping": "Sustained consumption -> demanding operation; degraded capacity -> fatigue.", "slug": "cognitive_resource_depletion", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b011_a10_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: People need to learn, decide, or operate under time pressure, stress, novelty, or fatigue. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["People need to learn, decide, or operate under time pressure, stress, novelty, or fatigue."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Decision Fatigue", "one_liner": "Reduced decision quality over time.", "page_ref": "prime:decision_fatigue", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Decision sequence -> deciding under load; depleted state -> cognitive fatigue.", "slug": "decision_fatigue", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires an extended decision sequence to deplete cognitive resources and degrade decisions over time."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Cognitive Resource Depletion", "one_liner": "Cognitive capacity degrades from sustained resource consumption.", "page_ref": "prime:cognitive_resource_depletion", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Sustained consumption -> demanding operation; degraded capacity -> fatigue.", "slug": "cognitive_resource_depletion", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires sustained cognitive-resource consumption to degrade capacity and performance until restoration."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "People must learn, decide, or operate under time pressure, stress, novelty, or cognitive fatigue.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Depletion can cause slowing, avoidance, or default use without a discrete error.", "slug": "cognitive_resource_depletion"}], "residual_id": "r:cognitive_load_reduction:b011_a10_c2", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b011_a10_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Errors occur even when users are motivated and competent. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Errors occur even when users are motivated and competent."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Depletion can cause slowing, avoidance, or default use without a discrete error.", "slug": "cognitive_resource_depletion"}], "normalized_requirement": "Errors occur even when users are motivated and competent.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Errors occur even when users are motivated and competent.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires competing inputs drawing on a bounded selection pool, with degradation when demand exceeds supply.", "role_mapping": "Competing inputs -> simultaneous task demands; selection pool -> available cognitive bandwidth.", "slug": "attentional_capacity", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b011_a10_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The task requires many simultaneous memory, interpretation, or decision demands. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The task requires many simultaneous memory, interpretation, or decision demands."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Attentional Capacity", "one_liner": "Finite pool of selection bandwidth whose exceeded supply degrades processing through interference, slowing, or capture.", "page_ref": "prime:attentional_capacity", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Competing inputs -> simultaneous task demands; selection pool -> available cognitive bandwidth.", "slug": "attentional_capacity", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires competing inputs drawing on a bounded selection pool, with degradation when demand exceeds supply."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A task imposes many simultaneous memory, interpretation, selection, or decision demands.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B5", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Depletion can cause slowing, avoidance, or default use without a discrete error.", "slug": "cognitive_resource_depletion"}], "residual_id": "r:cognitive_load_reduction:b011_a10_c2", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b011_a10_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Errors occur even when users are motivated and competent. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Errors occur even when users are motivated and competent."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Depletion can cause slowing, avoidance, or default use without a discrete error.", "slug": "cognitive_resource_depletion"}], "normalized_requirement": "Errors occur even when users are motivated and competent.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Errors occur even when users are motivated and competent.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P007-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must apply to presentation of complex information in a task context.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Complex information is presented to a task performer or decision maker.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require absence of task-relevant grouping in the presentation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Task-relevant grouping is absent from the presentation.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require absence of task-relevant sequencing in the presentation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Task-relevant sequence is absent from the presentation.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require absence of examples that support performance of the task.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Task-relevant examples are absent from the presentation.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require that the presentation fails to expose the task's relevant current state.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Relevant task state is not visible in the presentation.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Complex information is presented without task-relevant grouping, sequence, examples, or visible state.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "complex information is presented without all four named task supports", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P007-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Chunking is one remedy; its presence does not entail that the current presentation lacks every listed support.", "slug": "chunking"}], "residual_id": "r:cognitive_load_reduction:b011_a10_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b011_a10_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Complex information is presented without grouping, sequence, examples, or visible state. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Complex information is presented without grouping, sequence, examples, or visible state."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Chunking is one remedy; its presence does not entail that the current presentation lacks every listed support.", "slug": "chunking"}], "normalized_requirement": "Complex information is presented without task-relevant grouping, sequence, examples, or visible state.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Complex information is presented without task-relevant grouping, sequence, examples, or visible state.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 5", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B6", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Depletion can cause slowing, avoidance, or default use without a discrete error.", "slug": "cognitive_resource_depletion"}], "residual_id": "r:cognitive_load_reduction:b011_a10_c2", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b011_a10_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Errors occur even when users are motivated and competent. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Errors occur even when users are motivated and competent."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Depletion can cause slowing, avoidance, or default use without a discrete error.", "slug": "cognitive_resource_depletion"}], "normalized_requirement": "Errors occur even when users are motivated and competent.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Errors occur even when users are motivated and competent.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires an extended decision sequence to deplete cognitive resources and degrade decisions over time.", "role_mapping": "Decision sequence -> deciding under load; depleted state -> cognitive fatigue.", "slug": "decision_fatigue", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime requires sustained cognitive-resource consumption to degrade capacity and performance until restoration.", "role_mapping": "Sustained consumption -> demanding operation; degraded capacity -> fatigue.", "slug": "cognitive_resource_depletion", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b011_a10_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: People need to learn, decide, or operate under time pressure, stress, novelty, or fatigue. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["People need to learn, decide, or operate under time pressure, stress, novelty, or fatigue."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Decision Fatigue", "one_liner": "Reduced decision quality over time.", "page_ref": "prime:decision_fatigue", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Decision sequence -> deciding under load; depleted state -> cognitive fatigue.", "slug": "decision_fatigue", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires an extended decision sequence to deplete cognitive resources and degrade decisions over time."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Cognitive Resource Depletion", "one_liner": "Cognitive capacity degrades from sustained resource consumption.", "page_ref": "prime:cognitive_resource_depletion", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Sustained consumption -> demanding operation; degraded capacity -> fatigue.", "slug": "cognitive_resource_depletion", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires sustained cognitive-resource consumption to degrade capacity and performance until restoration."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "People must learn, decide, or operate under time pressure, stress, novelty, or cognitive fatigue.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 6", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 11, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-011", "ledger_sha256": "a314dcfd0ffa13cda9a0daa8b2f2285c1b49d08f4911b836b1e12e598c429072"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Cognitive Representation Externalization", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:cognitive_representation_externalization", "slug": "cognitive_representation_externalization"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 4, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 2, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 2 of 4 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is hidden cognition. The relevant model exists, but it is private, tacit, unstable, or distributed across people. Because the model is not externally represented, it cannot be reliably shared, debugged, compared, taught, audited, or updated.\n\nThis creates familiar failures: teams discover late that they meant different things by the same term; experts cannot explain their judgment well enough for others to challenge; learners can give answers but not show relationships; workflows fail because each role assumes a different handoff model; decisions look confident because the assumptions behind them were never visible.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "The relevant structure exists only in people's heads, making it hard to share, debug, compare, or update."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a cognizer-held structured representation with entities, relations, and model-running inference support.", "role_mapping": "Internal model -> hidden representation; entities and relations -> reasoning structure.", "slug": "mental_model", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b011_a11_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Important reasoning depends on relationships, assumptions, causal links, categories, sequences, or constraints that are not visible to others. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Important reasoning depends on relationships, assumptions, causal links, categories, sequences, or constraints that are not visible to others."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Mental Model", "one_liner": "Internal system representation.", "page_ref": "prime:mental_model", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Internal model -> hidden representation; entities and relations -> reasoning structure.", "slug": "mental_model", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a cognizer-held structured representation with entities, relations, and model-running inference support."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Reasoning depends on an internal representation of relationships, assumptions, causes, categories, sequences, or constraints that others cannot inspect.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P007-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"], ["O1", "O3"], ["O1", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require task demand greater than available working-memory capacity, not merely a complex task.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The task's working-memory demand exceeds available working-memory capacity.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must connect working-memory overload to loss of task pieces.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A complete branch is that the overload causes task pieces to be forgotten.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must connect working-memory overload to uncontrolled movement between representational levels.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A complete branch is that the overload causes people to jump between task levels.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must connect working-memory overload to failure to retain task dependencies.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A complete branch is that the overload causes dependency tracking to be lost.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "The task exceeds working memory, causing lost pieces, level jumps, or lost dependency tracking.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "working-memory overload causes loss of task structure", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P007-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Moving work into an external support is a response and need not be preceded by observed dependency loss.", "slug": "cognitive_offloading"}], "residual_id": "r:cognitive_representation_externalization:b011_a11_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b011_a11_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The task exceeds working memory, causing people to forget pieces, jump between levels, or lose track of dependencies. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The task exceeds working memory, causing people to forget pieces, jump between levels, or lose track of dependencies."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Moving work into an external support is a response and need not be preceded by observed dependency loss.", "slug": "cognitive_offloading"}], "normalized_requirement": "The task exceeds working memory, causing lost pieces, level jumps, or lost dependency tracking.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The task exceeds working memory, causing lost pieces, level jumps, or lost dependency tracking.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P008-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require multiple actors sharing the same terms or verbal expressions.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Two or more actors use the same language for the relevant work.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require substantive divergence between internal models, not minor personal variation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The actors' underlying models differ materially from one another.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the contrast in which linguistic agreement fails to imply model agreement.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The model divergence is hidden by or coexists with the actors' shared language.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must locate the divergence in conceptual or procedural content behind the shared language.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The divergent models concern meanings, process steps, priorities, or comparable shared-work structure.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require later discovery or revelation of the model divergence following the earlier shared-language use.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The divergence in the actors' models is revealed later, after their use of the same language.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "Different actors use the same language but reveal later that they had different models of what the terms, steps, or priorities meant.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "shared language precedes later revelation of materially divergent internal models", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P008-C01-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "That prime requires a presentation layer and machine-readable semantic layer of one artifact, not differing human models behind shared words.", "slug": "presentational_semantic_mismatch"}], "residual_id": "r:cognitive_representation_externalization:b011_a11_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b011_a11_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Different actors use the same language but reveal later that they had different models of what the terms, steps, or priorities meant. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Different actors use the same language but reveal later that they had different models of what the terms, steps, or priorities meant."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "That prime requires a presentation layer and machine-readable semantic layer of one artifact, not differing human models behind shared words.", "slug": "presentational_semantic_mismatch"}], "normalized_requirement": "Actors use the same language while holding materially different models of terms, steps, or priorities.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Actors use the same language while holding materially different models of terms, steps, or priorities.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires competent performance whose governing rules cannot be fully articulated and are extractable only indirectly.", "role_mapping": "Articulation gap -> tacit inferential structure; competent agent -> learner, expert, team, or stakeholder.", "slug": "implicit_knowledge", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b011_a11_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A learner, expert, team, or stakeholder cannot easily explain why a conclusion follows because the structure behind the conclusion remains tacit. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A learner, expert, team, or stakeholder cannot easily explain why a conclusion follows because the structure behind the conclusion remains tacit."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Implicit Knowledge", "one_liner": "Unconscious understanding.", "page_ref": "prime:implicit_knowledge", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Articulation gap -> tacit inferential structure; competent agent -> learner, expert, team, or stakeholder.", "slug": "implicit_knowledge", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires competent performance whose governing rules cannot be fully articulated and are extractable only indirectly."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A learner, expert, team, or stakeholder cannot readily articulate why a conclusion follows because its inferential structure remains tacit.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "DISJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Reviewers need to test the model, not merely inspect a final answer, claim, or decision.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This creates familiar failures: teams discover late that they meant different things by the same term; experts cannot explain their judgment well enough for others to challenge; learners can give answers but not show relationships; workflows fail because each role assumes a different handoff model; decisions look confident because the assumptions behind them were never visible. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: Reviewers need to test the model, not merely inspect a final answer, claim, or decision. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Reviewers need to test the model, not merely inspect a final answer, claim, or decision.", "This creates familiar failures: teams discover late that they meant different things by the same term; experts cannot explain their judgment well enough for others to challenge; learners can give answers but not show relationships; workflows fail because each role assumes a different handoff model; decisions look confident because the assumptions behind them were never visible."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Reviewers need to test the model, not merely inspect a final answer, claim, or decision."}, {"display_text": "The problem requires repeated revision, handoff, teaching, or coordination across time.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this deployment constraint: The problem requires repeated revision, handoff, teaching, or coordination across time. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The problem requires repeated revision, handoff, teaching, or coordination across time."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The problem requires repeated revision, handoff, teaching, or coordination across time."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 11, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-011", "ledger_sha256": "a314dcfd0ffa13cda9a0daa8b2f2285c1b49d08f4911b836b1e12e598c429072"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Cognitive Workflow Sequencing", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:cognitive_workflow_sequencing", "slug": "cognitive_workflow_sequencing"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 6, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 5, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 6 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 1 of 6 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is premature cognitive demand. A workflow, meeting, training path, interface, or review asks people to perform a later-stage cognitive task before earlier-stage prerequisites exist.\n\nThis creates predictable distortions. People anchor on early opinions because evidence has not been organized. They debate categories before the vocabulary is shared. They choose among options before constraints are visible. They fill out forms before they understand what the fields mean. They vote before uncertainty has been surfaced.\n\nThe root tension is that cognition has dependency order, while organizations often impose calendar order, authority order, document order, tool order, or convenience order. Cognitive Workflow Sequencing realigns the process with the reasoning path.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "People are asked to make complex judgments, synthesize evidence, transfer responsibility, or perform integrated work before they have the prerequisite representations, vocabulary, distinctions, context, or evidence needed for that level of reasoning."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P008-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include a process whose input is unprocessed or unsynthesized information.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A cognitive or decision process begins from raw information.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require an immediate ordering from raw input to higher-order judgment or commitment.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The process moves directly from raw information to a decision-level activity.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail that prerequisite cognitive stages are skipped rather than merely compressed.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Intermediate orientation, representation, or sensemaking stages are absent from that transition.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must terminate the direct jump in a consequential judgment or commitment activity.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The endpoint is decision, debate, prioritization, commitment, or a comparable higher-order cognitive act.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "A process jumps from raw information directly to decision, debate, prioritization, or commitment.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "a cognitive process jumps directly from raw information to a decision-level activity", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P008-C02-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid sequence respects prerequisites and does not require a raw-to-decision jump.", "slug": "sequencing"}], "residual_id": "r:cognitive_workflow_sequencing:b011_a12_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b011_a12_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when teams move from raw information directly to decision, when onboarding asks newcomers to perform before context exists, when expert groups argue before they share evidence, or when a learning path exposes advanced complexity before prerequisite distinctions are in place. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A process jumps from raw information directly to decision, debate, prioritization, or commitment.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A process jumps from raw information directly to decision, debate, prioritization, or commitment.", "It is especially useful when teams move from raw information directly to decision, when onboarding asks newcomers to perform before context exists, when expert groups argue before they share evidence, or when a learning path exposes advanced complexity before prerequisite distinctions are in place."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid sequence respects prerequisites and does not require a raw-to-decision jump.", "slug": "sequencing"}], "normalized_requirement": "A process jumps from raw information directly to decision, debate, prioritization, or commitment.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A process jumps from raw information directly to decision, debate, prioritization, or commitment.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P008-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require participants whose joint or mutually relevant work is expected to yield a conclusion.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Multiple participants are engaged in a conclusion-producing process.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the imposed or normative conclusion expectation under the deficiency.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The participants are expected to produce a conclusion despite the missing prerequisite.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must require absence of vocabulary shared among the participants.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A complete branch is that the participants lack a shared vocabulary.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must require absence of a common representation for the subject matter.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A complete branch is that the participants lack a shared representation.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must require absence of context jointly available to the participants.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "A complete branch is that the participants lack shared context.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must require absence of an evidence base shared among the participants.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "A complete branch is that the participants lack shared evidence.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Participants lack shared vocabulary, representation, context, or evidence but are expected to conclude.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "participants are expected to conclude without a shared cognitive prerequisite", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P008-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Order dependence need not involve multiple participants or missing shared context.", "slug": "sequencing"}], "residual_id": "r:cognitive_workflow_sequencing:b011_a12_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b011_a12_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Participants lack shared vocabulary, representation, context, or evidence but are still expected to produce a conclusion. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Participants lack shared vocabulary, representation, context, or evidence but are still expected to produce a conclusion."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Order dependence need not involve multiple participants or missing shared context.", "slug": "sequencing"}], "normalized_requirement": "Participants lack shared vocabulary, representation, context, or evidence but are expected to conclude.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Participants lack shared vocabulary, representation, context, or evidence but are expected to conclude.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P008-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include either a learning path or an onboarding path and a participant asked to perform without assistance.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A learning or onboarding path assigns a participant an independent performance task.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the expectation of independent performance.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Independent performance is requested or demanded rather than merely offered as an option.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require the performance demand to precede availability of examples.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The independent-performance demand occurs before examples are available.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require the performance demand to precede availability of supervised practice without asserting that such practice is individually necessary for success.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The independent-performance demand occurs before supervised practice is available.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require the performance demand to precede availability of concepts expressly identified as prerequisites.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The independent-performance demand occurs before prerequisite concepts are available.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "A learning or onboarding path asks for independent performance before examples, supervised practice, or prerequisite concepts are available.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "a learning or onboarding path demands independent performance before named preparation is available", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P008-C04-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Sequencing is the ordering relation and does not entail that the current learning order violates it.", "slug": "sequencing"}], "residual_id": "r:cognitive_workflow_sequencing:b011_a12_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b011_a12_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A learning or onboarding path asks for independent performance before examples, supervised practice, or prerequisite concepts are available. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A learning or onboarding path asks for independent performance before examples, supervised practice, or prerequisite concepts are available."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Sequencing is the ordering relation and does not entail that the current learning order violates it.", "slug": "sequencing"}], "normalized_requirement": "A learning path demands independent performance before examples, supervised practice, or prerequisite concepts.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A learning path demands independent performance before examples, supervised practice, or prerequisite concepts.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P008-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must apply to a workflow containing the full set of distinct cognitive functions named by the source.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A meeting, review, investigation, or comparable cognitive workflow contains orientation, sensemaking, critique, synthesis, and decision functions.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail consolidation of the distinct phases into a shared processing step.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The distinct cognitive functions are collapsed rather than staged separately.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require a single combined step, not merely fewer stages or partial overlap.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "All of the cognitive functions are combined into one step.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail overload arising in the one step that bears the combined cognitive work.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The resulting combined step is overloaded.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "A meeting, review, or investigation collapses orientation, sensemaking, critique, synthesis, and decision into one overloaded step.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "distinct cognitive workflow phases are collapsed into one overloaded step", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P008-C05-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A deliberate order can include or separate these stages and does not entail their collapse.", "slug": "sequencing"}], "residual_id": "r:cognitive_workflow_sequencing:b011_a12_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b011_a12_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A meeting, review, or investigation blends orientation, sensemaking, critique, synthesis, and decision into one overloaded step. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A meeting, review, or investigation blends orientation, sensemaking, critique, synthesis, and decision into one overloaded step."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A deliberate order can include or separate these stages and does not entail their collapse.", "slug": "sequencing"}], "normalized_requirement": "A meeting, review, or investigation collapses orientation, sensemaking, critique, synthesis, and decision into one overloaded step.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A meeting, review, or investigation collapses orientation, sensemaking, critique, synthesis, and decision into one overloaded step.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B5", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires arrangement under precedence constraints to determine outcome independently of the task set.", "role_mapping": "Same task set -> total content; topological order -> changed manageability.", "slug": "sequencing", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b011_a12_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The same total content becomes manageable when encountered in a different cognitive order. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The same total content becomes manageable when encountered in a different cognitive order."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Sequencing", "one_liner": "Deliberately ordering steps under precedence constraints so that the arrangement itself, not just the set of tasks, determines the outcome.", "page_ref": "prime:sequencing", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Same task set -> total content; topological order -> changed manageability.", "slug": "sequencing", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires arrangement under precedence constraints to determine outcome independently of the task set."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The same total content becomes manageable under a different cognitive order.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 5", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B6", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P008-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require recurring errors rather than a single isolated mistake.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The relevant errors occur repeatedly.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail omission of prerequisites needed before the error-producing activity.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Required cognitive or procedural prerequisites have been skipped.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must assign the recurring errors to prerequisite omission, not merely correlate the two.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The skipped prerequisites cause the repeated errors.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the contrast excluding a motivation deficit as the explanation.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Missing motivation is not the operative cause.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the contrast excluding an authority deficit as the explanation.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Missing authority is not the operative cause.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Repeated errors arise from skipped prerequisites rather than missing motivation or authority.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "skipped prerequisites cause recurring errors rather than motivation or authority deficits", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P008-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A sequence can satisfy all prerequisites and therefore does not require repeated prerequisite-skip errors.", "slug": "sequencing"}], "residual_id": "r:cognitive_workflow_sequencing:b011_a12_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b011_a12_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Repeated errors arise from skipped prerequisites rather than from lack of motivation or lack of authority. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Repeated errors arise from skipped prerequisites rather than from lack of motivation or lack of authority."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A sequence can satisfy all prerequisites and therefore does not require repeated prerequisite-skip errors.", "slug": "sequencing"}], "normalized_requirement": "Repeated errors arise from skipped prerequisites rather than missing motivation or authority.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Repeated errors arise from skipped prerequisites rather than missing motivation or authority.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 6", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "DISJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 11, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-011", "ledger_sha256": "a314dcfd0ffa13cda9a0daa8b2f2285c1b49d08f4911b836b1e12e598c429072"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Coherence-Loss Containment and Recovery", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:coherence_loss_containment_and_recovery", "slug": "coherence_loss_containment_and_recovery"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Ordinary reliability monitoring looks at parts. Coherence failure lives in relations among parts. Local checks can therefore remain green while combined outputs interfere, replicas diverge, clocks split, teams act from incompatible contexts, or a correlated physical state loses fidelity. The environment may also retain inaccessible information about the system, so simply resetting a visible part does not restore the original relation.\n\nThe central tension is coupling. Systems need interaction for sensing, control, exchange, consent, learning, and adaptation. The same interaction can leak or scramble the relational state. Strong isolation protects coherence while making the system useless; open coupling maximizes exchange while exhausting the coherence budget.\n\n### Coherence model and observables\n\nDefine entities, relational variables, constraints, topology, reference frame, time or epoch, and functional invariant. A global invariant may require all nodes to share one value, preserve a bounded phase difference, agree on ordering, satisfy conservation across partitions, or maintain compatible interpretations. Pair the model with direct observables where possible and proxies where necessary.\n\nObservables can include pairwise disagreement, phase dispersion, cross-correlation, quorum overlap, log divergence, residual error, reference offset, invariant violations, handoff contradictions, duplicated authority, confidence disagreement, or inability to reproduce a joint result. Each measure needs uncertainty, latency, coverage, and known blind spots. A mean can hide two sharply coherent but mutually incompatible clusters.\n\n### Local and global inconsistency\n\nLocal inconsistency appears within a bounded region: two records conflict, one cluster diverges, or one team acts from incompatible instructions. Global incoherence can occur even if every region is internally consistent, because their references, epochs, semantics, or commitments differ. Conversely, local variation can be benign when the global invariant tolerates it. Triage must classify which level has failed.\n\nTopological location matters. A discrepancy at a peripheral node may remain contained; the same discrepancy at a shared reference, high-degree dependency, gateway, or authority boundary can spread rapidly. Monitor bridge edges, common infrastructure, and synchronization hubs, not only average node health.\n\n### Uncertainty and competing truths\n\nDuring failure, the system may not know which state is correct. Several partitions can hold valid observations from different intervals or locations. A protected reference can be stale; a majority can be jointly wrong; a central authority can suppress inconvenient local evidence. Represent candidate truths with provenance, time, scope, confidence, and authority rather than forcing premature convergence.\n\nRecovery can require preserving plurality until evidence discriminates. “Agree first, investigate later” risks synchronized error and erasure. The system should know how to operate with contested state, what decisions can safely proceed, and which require suspension or independent adjudication.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system's performance depends on correlations or coordinated state across multiple elements, but ordinary interaction with a noisy, variable, adversarial, or unobserved environment transfers information and phase relationships outward. Local health checks remain green while joint behavior becomes unreliable. Because the lost relation is distributed, repair efforts that address parts independently can worsen disagreement or create a false appearance of recovery."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a prior internally aligned or coordinated state whose functional relation can degrade.", "role_mapping": "Coherent state -> shared phase or coordination; system function -> joint behavior.", "slug": "coherence_breakdown_under_external_interaction", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b011_a13_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Function depends on shared phase, timing, reference, context, state estimate, or coordinated intent. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Function depends on shared phase, timing, reference, context, state estimate, or coordinated intent."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Coherence Breakdown Under External Interaction", "one_liner": "The loss of a system's internal phase alignment or coordination when it couples to an uncontrolled, noisy environment that drains coherence into inaccessible correlations.", "page_ref": "prime:coherence_breakdown_under_external_interaction", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Coherent state -> shared phase or coordination; system function -> joint behavior.", "slug": "coherence_breakdown_under_external_interaction", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a prior internally aligned or coordinated state whose functional relation can degrade."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Function depends on shared phase, timing, reference, context, state estimate, or coordinated intent across elements.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A rate of cross-boundary exchange need not be necessary, unavoidable, or only partly observed.", "slug": "environmental_coupling_strength"}], "residual_id": "r:coherence_loss_containment_and_recovery:b011_a13_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b011_a13_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: External coupling is necessary or unavoidable but only partly observed or controlled. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["External coupling is necessary or unavoidable but only partly observed or controlled."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A rate of cross-boundary exchange need not be necessary, unavoidable, or only partly observed.", "slug": "environmental_coupling_strength"}], "normalized_requirement": "Necessary or unavoidable environmental coupling is only partly observed or controlled.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Necessary or unavoidable environmental coupling is only partly observed or controlled.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime specifically loses phase alignment or coordination into inaccessible environmental correlations while local elements can remain intact.", "role_mapping": "Off-diagonal or alignment loss -> relational decay; intact system elements -> locally healthy components.", "slug": "coherence_breakdown_under_external_interaction", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b011_a13_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Coherence decays faster than local components fail. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Coherence decays faster than local components fail."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Coherence Breakdown Under External Interaction", "one_liner": "The loss of a system's internal phase alignment or coordination when it couples to an uncontrolled, noisy environment that drains coherence into inaccessible correlations.", "page_ref": "prime:coherence_breakdown_under_external_interaction", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Off-diagonal or alignment loss -> relational decay; intact system elements -> locally healthy components.", "slug": "coherence_breakdown_under_external_interaction", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime specifically loses phase alignment or coordination into inaccessible environmental correlations while local elements can remain intact."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Relational coherence decays before local components individually fail.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires system-environment coupling to drain coherence into inaccessible correlations or decorrelated states.", "role_mapping": "Environment coupling -> interaction; leaked correlation/noise -> coherence erosion.", "slug": "coherence_breakdown_under_external_interaction", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b011_a13_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Environmental interaction creates correlated noise, information leakage, drift, or incompatible updates. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Environmental interaction creates correlated noise, information leakage, drift, or incompatible updates."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Coherence Breakdown Under External Interaction", "one_liner": "The loss of a system's internal phase alignment or coordination when it couples to an uncontrolled, noisy environment that drains coherence into inaccessible correlations.", "page_ref": "prime:coherence_breakdown_under_external_interaction", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Environment coupling -> interaction; leaked correlation/noise -> coherence erosion.", "slug": "coherence_breakdown_under_external_interaction", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires system-environment coupling to drain coherence into inaccessible correlations or decorrelated states."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Environmental interaction produces noise, information leakage, drift, or incompatible updates that erode coordination.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "There is a recoverable operating region above a minimum coherence threshold.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: There is a recoverable operating region above a minimum coherence threshold. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["There is a recoverable operating region above a minimum coherence threshold."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "There is a recoverable operating region above a minimum coherence threshold."}, {"display_text": "Isolation, partitioning, re-synchronization, redundancy, or reference refresh can change the loss trajectory.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "If isolation, fencing, quiet windows, channel gating, quorum, independent references, rollback, reconciliation, or staged reentry can change the propagation radius, the archetype supplies the full lifecycle. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: Isolation, partitioning, re-synchronization, redundancy, or reference refresh can change the loss trajectory. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Isolation, partitioning, re-synchronization, redundancy, or reference refresh can change the loss trajectory.", "If isolation, fencing, quiet windows, channel gating, quorum, independent references, rollback, reconciliation, or staged reentry can change the propagation radius, the archetype supplies the full lifecycle."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Isolation, partitioning, re-synchronization, redundancy, or reference refresh can change the loss trajectory."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 11, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-011", "ledger_sha256": "a314dcfd0ffa13cda9a0daa8b2f2285c1b49d08f4911b836b1e12e598c429072"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Coherent Linear Space Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:coherent_linear_space_design", "slug": "coherent_linear_space_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 5, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 7 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 7}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system treats states, features, options, signals, resources, embeddings, or transformations as if they can be added, scaled, decomposed, averaged, projected, or interpolated, but the carrier set, scalar domain, operation rules, coordinate semantics, or closure conditions are implicit.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system treats states, features, options, signals, resources, embeddings, or transformations as if they can be added, scaled, decomposed, averaged, projected, or interpolated, but the carrier set, scalar domain, operation rules, coordinate semantics, or closure conditions are implicit."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A vector space supplies addition and scaling but need not be used by downstream work or support every listed operation without added structure.", "slug": "vector_space"}], "residual_id": "r:coherent_linear_space_design:b011_a14_c1", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b011_a14_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Downstream work relies on interpolation, extrapolation, averaging, projection, decomposition, residuals, or superposition. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Downstream work relies on interpolation, extrapolation, averaging, projection, decomposition, residuals, or superposition."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A vector space supplies addition and scaling but need not be used by downstream work or support every listed operation without added structure.", "slug": "vector_space"}], "normalized_requirement": "Downstream work relies on interpolation, extrapolation, averaging, projection, decomposition, residuals, or superposition.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Downstream work relies on interpolation, extrapolation, averaging, projection, decomposition, residuals, or superposition.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a population closed under coherent vector addition and scalar multiplication with basis-relative coordinates.", "role_mapping": "Population -> represented states; addition/scaling -> linear combinations; basis -> coordinates.", "slug": "vector_space", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b011_a14_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A representation uses vectors, embeddings, feature weights, coordinate axes, state vectors, or linear combinations. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A representation uses vectors, embeddings, feature weights, coordinate axes, state vectors, or linear combinations."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Vector Space", "one_liner": "A collection closed under linear combination, where adding and scaling are coherent.", "page_ref": "prime:vector_space", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Population -> represented states; addition/scaling -> linear combinations; basis -> coordinates.", "slug": "vector_space", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a population closed under coherent vector addition and scalar multiplication with basis-relative coordinates."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A representation is organized as vectors, embeddings, feature weights, coordinate axes, state vectors, or linear combinations.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a space, a combining rule, and a minimal independent spanning set from which coordinates and dimension follow.", "role_mapping": "Parent space -> ambient structure; generating set -> basis claim.", "slug": "basis", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime requires a structured configuration space, an independence criterion, and an invariant count of independent parameters.", "role_mapping": "Configuration space -> ambient structure; invariant degree count -> dimension claim.", "slug": "dimension", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b011_a14_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A basis, dimension, span, independence, distance, or projection claim needs a shared parent structure. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A basis, dimension, span, independence, distance, or projection claim needs a shared parent structure."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Basis", "one_liner": "A minimal independent generating set — the smallest collection from which every element of a space can be produced, with no member derivable from the others.", "page_ref": "prime:basis", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Parent space -> ambient structure; generating set -> basis claim.", "slug": "basis", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a space, a combining rule, and a minimal independent spanning set from which coordinates and dimension follow."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Dimension", "one_liner": "Degrees of freedom in a system.", "page_ref": "prime:dimension", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Configuration space -> ambient structure; invariant degree count -> dimension claim.", "slug": "dimension", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a structured configuration space, an independence criterion, and an invariant count of independent parameters."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A basis, dimension, span, independence, distance, or projection claim presupposes a shared ambient structure.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P008-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include a team or responsible evaluator, an operation with quantity-like inputs, and an output.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A team is responsible for an operation that takes two or more quantities as inputs and produces a result.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require different or incompatible semantic meanings among the inputs, not merely different numeric values.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The combined quantities are semantically unlike one another.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail realized combination of the unlike inputs in one operation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The operation actually combines the semantically unlike quantities.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require an epistemic or validation need concerning the result, not merely a possible failure state.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The team needs to determine the result's semantic meaningfulness.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve an open validity question about the result and must not require either meaningfulness or meaninglessness as already established.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The required determination asks whether the combined result remains semantically meaningful.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Operations combine unlike quantities and the team needs to know whether the result stays meaningful.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "a team must determine whether combining unlike quantities preserves semantic meaning", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P008-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A linear combination is defined among elements of one module or vector space and does not entail unlike semantic quantities.", "slug": "linear_combination"}], "residual_id": "r:coherent_linear_space_design:b011_a14_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b011_a14_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Operations combine unlike quantities and the team needs to know whether the result stays meaningful. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Operations combine unlike quantities and the team needs to know whether the result stays meaningful."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A linear combination is defined among elements of one module or vector space and does not entail unlike semantic quantities.", "slug": "linear_combination"}], "normalized_requirement": "Operations combine unlike quantities and their result may not remain semantically meaningful.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Operations combine unlike quantities and their result may not remain semantically meaningful.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A correct change of basis preserves intrinsic facts; conclusion changes require coordinate-sensitive misuse or a changed model.", "slug": "basis"}], "residual_id": "r:coherent_linear_space_design:b011_a14_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b011_a14_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Changing units, basis, normalization, or coefficient domain could change downstream conclusions. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Changing units, basis, normalization, or coefficient domain could change downstream conclusions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A correct change of basis preserves intrinsic facts; conclusion changes require coordinate-sensitive misuse or a changed model.", "slug": "basis"}], "normalized_requirement": "Changing units, basis, normalization, or coefficient domain can change downstream conclusions.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Changing units, basis, normalization, or coefficient domain can change downstream conclusions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A nonlinear relation can be modeled explicitly and does not require an erroneous linear simplification.", "slug": "nonlinearity"}], "residual_id": "r:coherent_linear_space_design:b011_a14_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b011_a14_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A nonlinear, thresholded, categorical, or constrained domain is being simplified as if it were linear. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A nonlinear, thresholded, categorical, or constrained domain is being simplified as if it were linear."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A nonlinear relation can be modeled explicitly and does not require an erroneous linear simplification.", "slug": "nonlinearity"}], "normalized_requirement": "A nonlinear, thresholded, categorical, or constrained domain is being simplified as if it were linear.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A nonlinear, thresholded, categorical, or constrained domain is being simplified as if it were linear.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The carrier set, scalar domain, addition, scaling, and closure assumptions are implicit or inconsistent even though downstream operations rely on them.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The carrier set, scalar domain, addition, scaling, and closure assumptions are implicit or inconsistent even though downstream operations rely on them.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Multiple systems exchange vector-like records and require interoperable addition, scaling, and coordinate semantics.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system treats states, features, options, signals, resources, embeddings, or transformations as if they can be added, scaled, decomposed, averaged, projected, or interpolated, but the carrier set, scalar domain, operation rules, coordinate semantics, or closure conditions are implicit. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: Multiple systems exchange vector-like records and require interoperable addition, scaling, and coordinate semantics. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Multiple systems exchange vector-like records and require interoperable addition, scaling, and coordinate semantics.", "A system treats states, features, options, signals, resources, embeddings, or transformations as if they can be added, scaled, decomposed, averaged, projected, or interpolated, but the carrier set, scalar domain, operation rules, coordinate semantics, or closure conditions are implicit."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "Multiple systems exchange vector-like records and require interoperable addition, scaling, and coordinate semantics."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 11, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-011", "ledger_sha256": "a314dcfd0ffa13cda9a0daa8b2f2285c1b49d08f4911b836b1e12e598c429072"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Cohort-Structured Replenishment Stabilization", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:cohort_structured_replenishment_stabilization", "slug": "cohort_structured_replenishment_stabilization"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system relies on a persistent stock, population, workforce, asset base, customer base, or capacity pool that is replenished through discrete cohorts. The strength of each cohort is determined by conditions during a short early window, not by the current aggregate stock. Later, as cohorts mature into functional roles or exit, the system experiences delayed abundance, scarcity, bottlenecks, and misleading boom-bust patterns that ordinary stock totals and average-rate controls fail to anticipate.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system relies on a persistent stock, population, workforce, asset base, customer base, or capacity pool that is replenished through discrete cohorts. The strength of each cohort is determined by conditions during a short early window, not by the current aggregate stock. Later, as cohorts mature into functional roles or exit, the system experiences delayed abundance, scarcity, bottlenecks, and misleading boom-bust patterns that ordinary stock totals and average-rate controls fail to anticipate."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a stock with a lifespan distribution replenished by distinct cohorts entering together.", "role_mapping": "Standing stock -> persistent stock; discrete entry cohorts -> replenishment.", "slug": "recruitment_variability", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b011_a15_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Discrete cohort replenishment. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Discrete cohort replenishment"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Recruitment Variability", "one_liner": "A stock replenished by discrete cohorts whose size is set by environmental conditions at an early sensitive window — not by current stock — develops persistent, age-structured echoes from which cohorts were lucky.", "page_ref": "prime:recruitment_variability", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Standing stock -> persistent stock; discrete entry cohorts -> replenishment.", "slug": "recruitment_variability", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a stock with a lifespan distribution replenished by distinct cohorts entering together."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A persistent stock is replenished through discrete entry cohorts.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires cohort size to be set during a narrow early recruitment window rather than across the whole lifespan.", "role_mapping": "Recruitment window -> sensitive interval; cohort size -> cohort strength.", "slug": "recruitment_variability", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b011_a15_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Early sensitive window. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Early sensitive window"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Recruitment Variability", "one_liner": "A stock replenished by discrete cohorts whose size is set by environmental conditions at an early sensitive window — not by current stock — develops persistent, age-structured echoes from which cohorts were lucky.", "page_ref": "prime:recruitment_variability", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Recruitment window -> sensitive interval; cohort size -> cohort strength.", "slug": "recruitment_variability", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires cohort size to be set during a narrow early recruitment window rather than across the whole lifespan."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Cohort strength is fixed during a narrow early sensitive window.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires window-acting external drivers and weak coupling between current stock and incoming cohort size.", "role_mapping": "External drivers -> weak control; current stock decoupling -> replenishment variability.", "slug": "recruitment_variability", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b011_a15_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: External or weakly controlled drivers. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["External or weakly controlled drivers"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Recruitment Variability", "one_liner": "A stock replenished by discrete cohorts whose size is set by environmental conditions at an early sensitive window — not by current stock — develops persistent, age-structured echoes from which cohorts were lucky.", "page_ref": "prime:recruitment_variability", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "External drivers -> weak control; current stock decoupling -> replenishment variability.", "slug": "recruitment_variability", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires window-acting external drivers and weak coupling between current stock and incoming cohort size."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "External or weakly controlled conditions during the early window govern cohort size more than current stock does.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P008-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include cohort entry into a persistent stock or subtype-preserving population.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A discrete cohort enters a system that has a standing stock.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must relate the entered cohort to functional contribution or observability in the stock.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The cohort later becomes functionally visible in that standing stock.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require delayed functional visibility after entry, not simultaneous entry and function.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A nonzero lag separates entry from functional visibility.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "A lag separates cohort entry from its functional visibility in the standing stock.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "cohort entry precedes functional stock visibility by a lag", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P008-C08-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Discrete cohorts can become observable or functional immediately; the prime does not require a maturation lag.", "slug": "recruitment_variability"}], "residual_id": "r:cohort_structured_replenishment_stabilization:b011_a15_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b011_a15_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Lag between entry and functional visibility. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Lag between entry and functional visibility"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Discrete cohorts can become observable or functional immediately; the prime does not require a maturation lag.", "slug": "recruitment_variability"}], "normalized_requirement": "A lag separates cohort entry from its functional visibility in the standing stock.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A lag separates cohort entry from its functional visibility in the standing stock.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires cohort-size signatures to persist for their lifetimes as age-structured echoes in the aggregate stock.", "role_mapping": "Aggregate stock -> superposition; cohort signature -> age structure.", "slug": "recruitment_variability", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b011_a15_c5a", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Aggregate stock masks age structure. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Aggregate stock masks age structure"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Recruitment Variability", "one_liner": "A stock replenished by discrete cohorts whose size is set by environmental conditions at an early sensitive window — not by current stock — develops persistent, age-structured echoes from which cohorts were lucky.", "page_ref": "prime:recruitment_variability", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Aggregate stock -> superposition; cohort signature -> age structure.", "slug": "recruitment_variability", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires cohort-size signatures to persist for their lifetimes as age-structured echoes in the aggregate stock."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The aggregate stock is a superposition of persistent age-structured cohort signatures.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Control lever targets the wrong time.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Control lever targets the wrong time. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Control lever targets the wrong time"]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Control lever targets the wrong time"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 11, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-011", "ledger_sha256": "a314dcfd0ffa13cda9a0daa8b2f2285c1b49d08f4911b836b1e12e598c429072"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Collective Learning System", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:collective_learning_system", "slug": "collective_learning_system"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a broken learning pathway. Experience is generated locally, but the system has weak mechanisms for recognizing the lesson, preserving it, deciding where it applies, translating it for other contexts, and checking whether it changes future behavior.\n\nA common false solution is to add a repository or a retrospective. Those can help, but they are only mechanisms. The deeper problem is that the system lacks a maintained route from experience to behavior update.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Knowledge gained in one part of the system fails to spread or change behavior elsewhere."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P008-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include a local system unit that successfully resolves a problem.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "One local team solves a problem within a larger system.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require identity or substantive equivalence between the solved problem and the problem appearing elsewhere.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The same problem recurs in another part of that system.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the solution-then-recurrence order.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The recurrence occurs after the local solution.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require cross-unit recurrence rather than reappearance only within the original team.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The recurrence occurs in a system part different from the team that solved it.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Problems solved by one local team later recur in another part of the system.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "a locally solved problem later recurs elsewhere in the system", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P008-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Disconnected subsystems need not have independently solved and then repeated the same problem.", "slug": "systemic_fragmentation"}], "residual_id": "r:collective_learning_system:b012_a01_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b012_a01_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Local teams solve problems that later reappear elsewhere. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Local teams solve problems that later reappear elsewhere"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Disconnected subsystems need not have independently solved and then repeated the same problem.", "slug": "systemic_fragmentation"}], "normalized_requirement": "Problems solved by one local team later recur in another part of the system.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Problems solved by one local team later recur in another part of the system.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P008-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include an experience-producing activity and knowledge or insight resulting from it.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A local event or undertaking generates an insight.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail realized knowledge generation, not merely an opportunity to learn.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The incident, project, pilot, experiment, or comparable event actually generates the insight.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require absence of a dependable transfer, retrieval, or adoption path for the insight.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "No reliable route carries the generated insight to reuse.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must make reuse, rather than initial creation or storage alone, the purpose blocked by the missing route.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The missing route concerns reuse of the generated insight in later or other work.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Incidents, projects, pilots, or experiments generate insight without a reliable route to reuse.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "locally generated insight lacks a reliable reuse path", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P008-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Collective learning is the desired propagation process, not the absence of a reuse path.", "slug": "collective_systemic_learning"}], "residual_id": "r:collective_learning_system:b012_a01_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b012_a01_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Incidents, projects, pilots, or experiments generate insights with no reliable path to reuse. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Incidents, projects, pilots, or experiments generate insights with no reliable path to reuse"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Collective learning is the desired propagation process, not the absence of a reuse path.", "slug": "collective_systemic_learning"}], "normalized_requirement": "Incidents, projects, pilots, or experiments generate insight without a reliable route to reuse.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Incidents, projects, pilots, or experiments generate insight without a reliable route to reuse.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P008-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require an extant repository containing or intended to contain knowledge.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "One or more knowledge repositories already exist.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require absence of user trust in the existing knowledge repositories.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Users do not trust the repositories.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require absence of repository search or consultation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Users do not search the repositories.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require absence of active selection, organization, or maintenance of repository knowledge.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The repositories are not curated.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require nonuse of repository knowledge in subsequent decision making.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Repository knowledge is not used in future decisions.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Knowledge repositories exist but are not trusted, searched, curated, or used in future decisions.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "existing knowledge repositories lack trust, search, curation, and future decision use", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P008-C13-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Distributed challenge can operate without a repository and does not entail repository disuse.", "slug": "community_distributed_adversarial_learning"}], "residual_id": "r:collective_learning_system:b012_a01_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b012_a01_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Repositories exist but are not trusted, searched, curated, or used in future decisions. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Repositories exist but are not trusted, searched, curated, or used in future decisions"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Distributed challenge can operate without a repository and does not entail repository disuse.", "slug": "community_distributed_adversarial_learning"}], "normalized_requirement": "Knowledge repositories exist but are not trusted, searched, curated, or used in later decisions.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Knowledge repositories exist but are not trusted, searched, curated, or used in later decisions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P008-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"], ["O1", "O3"], ["O1", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include practical know-how or experience as knowledge within a larger system.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A system contains practical knowledge used or held by its participants or components.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must connect replacement or departure of participants to system-level loss of practical knowledge.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A complete branch is that turnover erases practical knowledge from the system.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must connect separation of system parts to loss of practical knowledge.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A complete branch is that fragmentation erases practical knowledge from the system.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must connect passage of time to loss of practical knowledge.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A complete branch is that elapsed time erases practical knowledge from the system.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Turnover, fragmentation, or time erases practical knowledge from the system.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "organizational change or elapsed time erases practical system knowledge", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P008-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Knowledge can remain intact yet fail to become action; that relation does not require erasure.", "slug": "knowledge_action_gap"}], "residual_id": "r:collective_learning_system:b012_a01_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b012_a01_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Turnover, fragmentation, or time erases practical knowledge. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Turnover, fragmentation, or time erases practical knowledge"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Knowledge can remain intact yet fail to become action; that relation does not require erasure.", "slug": "knowledge_action_gap"}], "normalized_requirement": "Turnover, fragmentation, or time erases practical knowledge from the system.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Turnover, fragmentation, or time erases practical knowledge from the system.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Subunits differ enough that direct copying is risky.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when the organization has enough recurring similarity for lessons to transfer, but enough local variation that direct copying would be unsafe. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Subunits differ enough that direct copying is risky. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Subunits differ enough that direct copying is risky", "It is especially useful when the organization has enough recurring similarity for lessons to transfer, but enough local variation that direct copying would be unsafe."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Subunits differ enough that direct copying is risky"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 12, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-012", "ledger_sha256": "f5911392d8a0dca4ced046a216a6e54f86850e84cb27e9ef93b7e8fc3e090ca6"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Collective Memory Curation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:collective_memory_curation", "slug": "collective_memory_curation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 5 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Collective experience is born in unequal conditions. Leaders produce formal records; frontline workers produce local notes and oral accounts; marginalized people may leave few institutionally legible traces; survivors may avoid documentation; systems preserve what fits their fields; and later narrators inherit different incentives. Even when every retained item is accurate, the resulting collection can mislead through omission, arrangement, scale, or repeated emphasis.\n\nThis creates four coupled problems. First is fragility: memory disappears through turnover, platform change, material decay, or the death of witnesses. Second is capture: powerful actors define significance and suppress inconvenient perspectives. Third is overload: indiscriminate accumulation makes meaningful encounter impossible and consumes finite stewardship capacity. Fourth is harm: preserved material can expose people, retraumatize communities, violate cultural restrictions, enable surveillance, or freeze stigma.\n\nThe structural tension cannot be eliminated by claiming neutrality. Selection is unavoidable; so is interpretation. The design question is whether those operations remain implicit and unaccountable or become declared, participatory, evidence-aware, and revisable. Curation accepts responsibility for partiality while building safeguards against arbitrary erasure and dominant-story capture.\n\nCollective memory also differs from individual recollection. It is carried through institutions, rituals, narratives, artifacts, spaces, curricula, search systems, and recurring decisions. It persists only if stewardship survives and intended constituencies can encounter it. A technically preserved object that nobody can find, understand, trust, or use may be an archival holding, but it is not functioning as collective memory.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A group, institution, profession, or public inherits consequential experience across participants, generations, sites, and media, but no neutral process automatically turns those traces into shared memory. Records disappear; oral accounts remain inaccessible; dominant actors select convenient narratives; sensitive testimony is exposed or suppressed; repositories accumulate without interpretation; and later actors cannot tell what happened, whose perspective is missing, why a memory matters, or how it should shape identity, responsibility, or future decisions."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P008-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include collectively held lived experience and a later-member or intergenerational recipient role.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A community or institution has lived experience that could be transmitted to future members or generations.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a risk to continuity and not require completed memory loss.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Continuity of the lived experience is threatened rather than already certainly severed.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must connect member turnover to risk of severing lived experience from future members.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A complete branch is that turnover threatens intergenerational continuity of lived experience.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must connect displacement to risk of severing lived experience from future members.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A complete branch is that displacement threatens intergenerational continuity of lived experience.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must connect death of experience holders to risk of severing lived experience from future members.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "A complete branch is that death threatens intergenerational continuity of lived experience.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must connect institutional restructuring to risk of severing lived experience from future members.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "A complete branch is that restructuring threatens intergenerational continuity of lived experience.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must connect migration to risk of severing lived experience from future members.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "A complete branch is that migration threatens intergenerational continuity of lived experience.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must connect a platform transition to risk of severing lived experience from future members.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "A complete branch is that platform change threatens intergenerational continuity of lived experience.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Turnover, displacement, death, restructuring, migration, or platform change threatens intergenerational continuity of lived experience.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "membership or infrastructure change threatens transmission of lived experience to future members", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P008-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Replacement of components need not carry or threaten collective memory.", "slug": "turnover"}], "residual_id": "r:collective_memory_curation:b012_a02_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b012_a02_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Turnover, displacement, death, restructuring, migration, or platform change threatens to sever lived experience from future members. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Turnover, displacement, death, restructuring, migration, or platform change threatens to sever lived experience from future members."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Replacement of components need not carry or threaten collective memory.", "slug": "turnover"}], "normalized_requirement": "Turnover, displacement, death, restructuring, migration, or platform change threatens intergenerational continuity of lived experience.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Turnover, displacement, death, restructuring, migration, or platform change threatens intergenerational continuity of lived experience.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires plural vantage-bound, internally coherent, mutually inconsistent accounts of a single referent with no internal adjudicator.", "role_mapping": "Single referent -> consequential event; vantage accounts -> legitimate conflicting accounts.", "slug": "rashomon_effect", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b012_a02_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A consequential event has multiple legitimate or conflicting accounts. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A consequential event has multiple legitimate or conflicting accounts."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Rashomon Effect", "one_liner": "Multiple internally coherent but mutually inconsistent accounts of one event, underdetermined by the testimony set with no internal adjudication procedure.", "page_ref": "prime:rashomon_effect", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Single referent -> consequential event; vantage accounts -> legitimate conflicting accounts.", "slug": "rashomon_effect", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires plural vantage-bound, internally coherent, mutually inconsistent accounts of a single referent with no internal adjudicator."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "One consequential event has multiple internally coherent but mutually conflicting accounts.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P009-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require recurring group dispute rather than one isolated disagreement.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A group engages repeatedly in the relevant dispute.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require absence of a common trusted memory basis, not merely incomplete documentation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The group lacks a memory base that is both shared and trusted for the dispute.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must relate the recurring dispute to the group's identity.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A complete branch is that the recurring dispute concerns group identity.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must relate the recurring dispute to responsibility or accountability.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A complete branch is that the recurring dispute concerns accountability.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "The group repeatedly disputes identity or accountability without a trusted shared memory base.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "a group repeatedly disputes identity or accountability without trusted shared memory", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P009-C01-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Answerability for conduct need not depend on a collective memory dispute.", "slug": "accountability"}], "residual_id": "r:collective_memory_curation:b012_a02_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b012_a02_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The group repeatedly debates identity or accountability without a trusted memory base. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The group repeatedly debates identity or accountability without a trusted memory base."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Answerability for conduct need not depend on a collective memory dispute.", "slug": "accountability"}], "normalized_requirement": "The group repeatedly disputes identity or accountability without a trusted shared memory base.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The group repeatedly disputes identity or accountability without a trusted shared memory base.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P009-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require extant archives whose records or storage have not been technically lost or corrupted.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Archives exist and remain technically intact.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require absence of meaningful social interpretation, use, engagement, or effect of the archives.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The archives are socially inert.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the contrast in which technical preservation does not yield social activation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Social inertness persists despite technical integrity.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Existing archives are technically intact but socially inert.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "technically intact archives have no social uptake or effect", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P009-C02-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Shared representations can be active, contested, and consequential rather than inert.", "slug": "collective_memory"}], "residual_id": "r:collective_memory_curation:b012_a02_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b012_a02_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Existing archives are technically intact but socially inert. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Existing archives are technically intact but socially inert."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Shared representations can be active, contested, and consequential rather than inert.", "slug": "collective_memory"}], "normalized_requirement": "Existing archives are technically intact but socially inert.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Existing archives are technically intact but socially inert.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P009-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include a collective-memory representation and distinct experience classes represented within or excluded from it.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A collective memory contains or could contain representations of multiple classes of experience.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require persistent or patterned excess representation of some experience, not a one-off imbalance.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "At least one class of experience is systematically overrepresented.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require patterned total omission of a distinct experience class.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "At least one other class of experience is systematically absent.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the contrast between favored and omitted experience classes within the same collective memory.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The overrepresented and absent experiences are different, forming an asymmetric collective record.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Some experiences are systematically overrepresented while others are systematically absent from collective memory.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "collective memory systematically overrepresents some experiences while omitting others", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P009-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Collective memory does not definitionally require unequal representation or omission.", "slug": "collective_memory"}], "residual_id": "r:collective_memory_curation:b012_a02_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b012_a02_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Some experiences are systematically overrepresented and others systematically absent. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Some experiences are systematically overrepresented and others systematically absent."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Collective memory does not definitionally require unequal representation or omission.", "slug": "collective_memory"}], "normalized_requirement": "Some experiences are systematically overrepresented while others are systematically absent from collective memory.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Some experiences are systematically overrepresented while others are systematically absent from collective memory.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Memory itself can cause harm.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Memory itself can cause harm. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Memory itself can cause harm."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Memory itself can cause harm."}, {"display_text": "A community is moving from event memory to intergenerational or institutional memory.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: A community is moving from event memory to intergenerational or institutional memory. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A community is moving from event memory to intergenerational or institutional memory."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "A community is moving from event memory to intergenerational or institutional memory."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 12, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-012", "ledger_sha256": "f5911392d8a0dca4ced046a216a6e54f86850e84cb27e9ef93b7e8fc3e090ca6"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Collision-Free Mapping Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:collision_free_mapping_design", "slug": "collision_free_mapping_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A mapping, allocation, identifier scheme, encoding, registry, or lookup process allows two distinct source entities, states, requests, claims, or records to share one target value even though downstream systems interpret that shared value as a single identity, slot, claim, resource, or representation. The collision erases distinctions, causes overwrites or double-use, breaks audit trails, and makes repair difficult after the collapsed target has propagated.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A mapping, allocation, identifier scheme, encoding, registry, or lookup process allows two distinct source entities, states, requests, claims, or records to share one target value even though downstream systems interpret that shared value as a single identity, slot, claim, resource, or representation. The collision erases distinctions, causes overwrites or double-use, breaks audit trails, and makes repair difficult after the collapsed target has propagated."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P009-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include a downstream interpreting role and a target-side value.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A downstream consumer receives or observes a target value produced by a mapping or allocation process.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail an evidentiary or identification inference from target value to upstream referent.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The consumer treats the target value as evidence of its provenance referent.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require a uniqueness assumption in the downstream inference, not merely a probabilistic association.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The target value is treated as evidence of exactly one referent.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must map the target value back to an identity- or provenance-bearing role and must explicitly permit entities as well as the other listed referent types.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The inferred referent is a source, owner, request, entity, record, resource, state, or comparable provenance-bearing role.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "A downstream consumer treats one target value as unique evidence of one source, owner, request, entity, record, resource, or state.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "a downstream consumer infers a unique provenance referent from one target value", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P009-C05-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An injective mapping makes unique recovery valid but does not require a downstream consumer to rely on the target as evidence.", "slug": "injectivity"}], "residual_id": "r:collision_free_mapping_design:b012_a03_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b012_a03_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A target value is treated as unique evidence of a source, owner, request, entity, record, resource, or state. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A target value is treated as unique evidence of a source, owner, request, entity, record, resource, or state."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An injective mapping makes unique recovery valid but does not require a downstream consumer to rely on the target as evidence.", "slug": "injectivity"}], "normalized_requirement": "A downstream consumer treats one target value as unique evidence of one source, owner, request, record, resource, or state.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A downstream consumer treats one target value as unique evidence of one source, owner, request, record, resource, or state.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires an unbounded input space reduced into a short bounded codomain, making the mapping necessarily many-to-one with a collision regime.", "role_mapping": "Input objects -> sources; fixed token -> target value; collision -> shared target.", "slug": "hashing", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b012_a03_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Two or more distinct sources could be assigned, normalized, hashed, encoded, booked, reserved, or linked to the same target. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Two or more distinct sources could be assigned, normalized, hashed, encoded, booked, reserved, or linked to the same target."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Hashing", "one_liner": "Deterministically reducing any object to a short fixed-size token used as its handle.", "page_ref": "prime:hashing", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Input objects -> sources; fixed token -> target value; collision -> shared target.", "slug": "hashing", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires an unbounded input space reduced into a short bounded codomain, making the mapping necessarily many-to-one with a collision regime."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Distinct sources can map to the same bounded target value.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P009-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O9"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include a collision that collapses distinct source-side items onto one target-side representation or resource.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Two or more distinct source-side items collide at a shared target value or allocation.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a conditional consequence and not require that the corruption has already occurred.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The selected downstream consequence would follow conditionally from the collision.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must connect the collision to merging histories that should remain distinct.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A complete branch is that the collision would merge distinct histories.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must connect the collision to multiple bookings against the same capacity.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A complete branch is that the collision would double-book capacity.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must connect the collision to distinct claims being represented or processed as duplicated claims.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "A complete branch is that the collision would duplicate claims.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must connect the collision to destructive replacement of one source's data by another's.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "A complete branch is that the collision would overwrite data.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must connect the collision to access being directed to the wrong source-side entity or resource.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "A complete branch is that the collision would misroute access.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must connect the collision to incorrect identity assignment or interpretation.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "A complete branch is that the collision would corrupt identity.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must connect the collision to inability to distinguish the source-side referent.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "A complete branch is that the collision would create ambiguity.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "A collision would merge histories, double-book capacity, duplicate claims, overwrite data, misroute access, corrupt identity, or create ambiguity.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "a mapping collision would corrupt downstream history, allocation, claims, data, routing, identity, or interpretation", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P009-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Hash collisions are budgeted possibilities but need not have any of these consequential downstream effects.", "slug": "hashing"}], "residual_id": "r:collision_free_mapping_design:b012_a03_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b012_a03_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Collisions would merge histories, double-book capacity, duplicate claims, overwrite data, misroute access, corrupt identity, or create ambiguity. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Collisions would merge histories, double-book capacity, duplicate claims, overwrite data, misroute access, corrupt identity, or create ambiguity."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Hash collisions are budgeted possibilities but need not have any of these consequential downstream effects.", "slug": "hashing"}], "normalized_requirement": "A collision would merge histories, double-book capacity, overwrite data, misroute access, corrupt identity, or create ambiguity.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A collision would merge histories, double-book capacity, overwrite data, misroute access, corrupt identity, or create ambiguity.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires random filling of a finite namespace and shows that any-pair collision probability rises at the square root of namespace size.", "role_mapping": "Finite namespace -> targets; random draws -> one listed generation mode; match-any-pair -> collision.", "slug": "birthday_problem", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b012_a03_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Mappings are generated concurrently, randomly, by multiple authorities, through truncation, or under changing namespace rules. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Mappings are generated concurrently, randomly, by multiple authorities, through truncation, or under changing namespace rules."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Birthday Problem", "one_liner": "Pairwise collisions in a finite namespace become likely at the square root of its size, not half of it.", "page_ref": "prime:birthday_problem", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Finite namespace -> targets; random draws -> one listed generation mode; match-any-pair -> collision.", "slug": "birthday_problem", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires random filling of a finite namespace and shows that any-pair collision probability rises at the square root of namespace size."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Mappings are generated concurrently, randomly, by multiple authorities, through truncation, or under changing namespace rules.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Unused target values are acceptable, so surjective coverage is not the main requirement.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system may have a huge or open target space and may legitimately leave many targets unused. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Unused target values are acceptable, so surjective coverage is not the main requirement. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Unused target values are acceptable, so surjective coverage is not the main requirement.", "A system may have a huge or open target space and may legitimately leave many targets unused."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Unused target values are acceptable, so surjective coverage is not the main requirement."}, {"display_text": "An intentional merge path exists, but unreviewed accidental merges must be prevented or exposed.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this deployment constraint: An intentional merge path exists, but unreviewed accidental merges must be prevented or exposed. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["An intentional merge path exists, but unreviewed accidental merges must be prevented or exposed."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "An intentional merge path exists, but unreviewed accidental merges must be prevented or exposed."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 12, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-012", "ledger_sha256": "f5911392d8a0dca4ced046a216a6e54f86850e84cb27e9ef93b7e8fc3e090ca6"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Commitment Lifecycle Governance", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:commitment_lifecycle_governance", "slug": "commitment_lifecycle_governance"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "People and institutions coordinate around promises, assurances, declarations, and plans whose binding force is ambiguous. The speaker may lack authority or capacity; the object and conditions may be underspecified; counterparties may rely more heavily than intended; verification may be controlled by the promisor; changed circumstances may be hidden until failure; and no explicit state distinguishes proposed, active, threatened, amended, satisfied, breached, or released commitments. As a result, ordinary statements acquire accidental obligations, serious commitments remain cheap talk, or rigid commitments survive after their legitimate basis has disappeared.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "People and institutions coordinate around promises, assurances, declarations, and plans whose binding force is ambiguous. The speaker may lack authority or capacity; the object and conditions may be underspecified; counterparties may rely more heavily than intended; verification may be controlled by the promisor; changed circumstances may be hidden until failure; and no explicit state distinguishes proposed, active, threatened, amended, satisfied, breached, or released commitments. As a result, ordinary statements acquire accidental obligations, serious commitments remain cheap talk, or rigid commitments survive after their legitimate basis has disappeared."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a present self-binding act over future action or truth, owed to a relying party who plans around it.", "role_mapping": "Binding agent -> owner; bound object -> future action/proposition; addressee -> relying party.", "slug": "commitment", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b012_a04_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Another person, team, institution, or future self must make present decisions based on expected future action or the truth of a consequential proposition. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Another person, team, institution, or future self must make present decisions based on expected future action or the truth of a consequential proposition."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Commitment", "one_liner": "An agent binds itself in the present to a future course of action or to the truth of a proposition, creating a new constraint on future behavior that others can rely on.", "page_ref": "prime:commitment", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Binding agent -> owner; bound object -> future action/proposition; addressee -> relying party.", "slug": "commitment", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a present self-binding act over future action or truth, owed to a relying party who plans around it."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A party makes present decisions in reliance on another agent's future action or consequential proposition.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A commitment includes a breach consequence but need not cross the stated material-cost threshold.", "slug": "commitment"}], "residual_id": "r:commitment_lifecycle_governance:b012_a04_c2", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b012_a04_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The speaker may lack authority or capacity; the object and conditions may be underspecified; counterparties may rely more heavily than intended; verification may be controlled by the promisor; changed circumstances may be hidden until failure; and no explicit state distinguishes proposed, active, threatened, amended, satisfied, breached, or released commitments. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Failure, delay, reversal, or ambiguity would impose material cost, risk, lost opportunity, or trust damage on relying parties.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Failure, delay, reversal, or ambiguity would impose material cost, risk, lost opportunity, or trust damage on relying parties.", "The speaker may lack authority or capacity; the object and conditions may be underspecified; counterparties may rely more heavily than intended; verification may be controlled by the promisor; changed circumstances may be hidden until failure; and no explicit state distinguishes proposed, active, threatened, amended, satisfied, breached, or released commitments."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A commitment includes a breach consequence but need not cross the stated material-cost threshold.", "slug": "commitment"}], "normalized_requirement": "Failure, delay, reversal, or ambiguity would impose material cost, risk, lost opportunity, or trust damage on relying parties.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Failure, delay, reversal, or ambiguity would impose material cost, risk, lost opportunity, or trust damage on relying parties.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a present restriction of future choice that closes a time-inconsistency gap and makes compliance incentive-compatible at execution.", "role_mapping": "Future re-optimization -> preference change; choice restriction -> survival of conflicting incentives.", "slug": "credible_commitment", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b012_a04_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The commitment needs to survive memory loss, staff turnover, preference change, political pressure, or conflicting incentives. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The commitment needs to survive memory loss, staff turnover, preference change, political pressure, or conflicting incentives."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Credible Commitment", "one_liner": "Deliberately constrain your own future choices so a promise or threat stays incentive-compatible at the moment of execution.", "page_ref": "prime:credible_commitment", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Future re-optimization -> preference change; choice restriction -> survival of conflicting incentives.", "slug": "credible_commitment", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a present restriction of future choice that closes a time-inconsistency gap and makes compliance incentive-compatible at execution."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The commitment must survive memory loss, staff turnover, preference change, political pressure, or conflicting incentives.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P009-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include a statement, agreement, target, forecast, policy, contract, pledge, or comparable commitment-like instrument.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An actor or institution issues or relies on a bare commitment-like declaration.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require a self-execution assumption, not merely that a declaration has normative relevance.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The declaration is treated as executing or binding itself without further lifecycle acts.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require absence of explicit governance for activation, amendment, satisfaction, breach, release, or comparable lifecycle transitions.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Governed transitions among commitment states are absent.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must connect the interpretive treatment and governance absence in the same commitment lifecycle.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Self-executing treatment persists despite the absence of governed state transitions.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require present self-executing treatment and cannot satisfy this obligation with only historical or prospective treatment.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The declaration is currently being treated as self-executing.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "A bare statement, handshake, target, forecast, policy, contract, or public pledge is currently being treated as self-executing without governed state transitions.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "a bare commitment-like declaration is treated as self-executing without lifecycle governance", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P009-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid commitment includes a binding act, release conditions, and breach consequence rather than a bare self-executing statement.", "slug": "commitment"}], "residual_id": "r:commitment_lifecycle_governance:b012_a04_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b012_a04_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A bare statement, handshake, target, forecast, policy, contract, or public pledge is currently being treated as self-executing. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A bare statement, handshake, target, forecast, policy, contract, or public pledge is currently being treated as self-executing."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid commitment includes a binding act, release conditions, and breach consequence rather than a bare self-executing statement.", "slug": "commitment"}], "normalized_requirement": "A bare statement, handshake, target, forecast, policy, contract, or pledge is treated as self-executing without governed state transitions.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A bare statement, handshake, target, forecast, policy, contract, or pledge is treated as self-executing without governed state transitions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The owner can identify at least some controllable performance, evidence, conditions, dependencies, and response options.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: The owner can identify at least some controllable performance, evidence, conditions, dependencies, and response options. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The owner can identify at least some controllable performance, evidence, conditions, dependencies, and response options."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "The owner can identify at least some controllable performance, evidence, conditions, dependencies, and response options."}, {"display_text": "The environment may change enough that amendment or release must be governed rather than improvised.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A commitment must be strong enough that others can rely on it, yet bounded enough that uncontrollable change, new evidence, rights, consent, and safety can still be handled without deception or coercion. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: The environment may change enough that amendment or release must be governed rather than improvised. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The environment may change enough that amendment or release must be governed rather than improvised.", "A commitment must be strong enough that others can rely on it, yet bounded enough that uncontrollable change, new evidence, rights, consent, and safety can still be handled without deception or coercion."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The environment may change enough that amendment or release must be governed rather than improvised."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 12, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-012", "ledger_sha256": "f5911392d8a0dca4ced046a216a6e54f86850e84cb27e9ef93b7e8fc3e090ca6"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Common Fate and Synchronized Movement Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:common_fate_and_synchronized_movement_design", "slug": "common_fate_and_synchronized_movement_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 3 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is fragmented or misleading dynamic relation. Related parts may move out of phase, update at conflicting times, or signal different trajectories, causing observers to miss the connection among them. Alternatively, unrelated parts may move together by accident and imply a relationship that does not exist.\n\nThis creates a tension between legible unity and adaptive variation. Too little synchrony looks chaotic; too much synchrony becomes brittle lockstep or false consensus.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A set of related elements needs to be perceived, operated, or transitioned as a coherent whole, but the relationship is not legible because elements move, change, signal, or renew at unrelated times or along incompatible trajectories. Conversely, accidental co-movement may imply a false relationship or create unjustified pressure toward uniformity."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P009-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include a boundary, label, proximity cue, or comparable static representation of a relation.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A static cue is used to represent or communicate a relation among elements.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require insufficiency of the static cue, not merely coexistence with another cue.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The static cue is insufficient to communicate or support the decisive relation.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require a relation whose decisive information lies in time, movement, transition, or phase.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The decisive relation is temporal, dynamic, phase-based, or comparably dependent on change over time.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must connect the static cue's insufficiency specifically to its inability to express the dynamic relation.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The dynamic character of the decisive relation is why the static cue is insufficient.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "A static boundary, label, or proximity cue is insufficient because the decisive relation is temporal, dynamic, or phase-based.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "a static grouping cue is insufficient for a decisively dynamic relation", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P009-C08-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Coordinated action need not be visually grouped or contrasted with a static cue.", "slug": "coordination"}], "residual_id": "r:common_fate_and_synchronized_movement_design:b012_a05_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b012_a05_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A static boundary, label, or proximity cue is not enough because the decisive relationship is temporal, dynamic, or phase-based. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A static boundary, label, or proximity cue is not enough because the decisive relationship is temporal, dynamic, or phase-based."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Coordinated action need not be visually grouped or contrasted with a static cue.", "slug": "coordination"}], "normalized_requirement": "A static boundary, label, or proximity cue is insufficient because the decisive relation is temporal, dynamic, or phase-based.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A static boundary, label, or proximity cue is insufficient because the decisive relation is temporal, dynamic, or phase-based.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P009-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include a process involving coordinated behavior or change across more than one element.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A rollout, renewal, performance, transition, state change, or comparable process spans multiple elements.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require coordination across the elements rather than independent simultaneous activity.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The participating elements coordinate their behavior or state changes.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require perceptible coordination, not only hidden synchronization.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The cross-element coordination is visible or otherwise legible to relevant observers.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must make visible coordination necessary to the process rather than an incidental presentation feature.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The multi-element process depends on that visible coordination.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "A rollout, renewal, performance, transition, or interface-state change depends on visible coordination across elements.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "a multi-element change depends on visibly coordinated element behavior", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P009-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Synchronization can align phase without making coordination visible to observers.", "slug": "synchronization"}], "residual_id": "r:common_fate_and_synchronized_movement_design:b012_a05_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b012_a05_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A rollout, renewal cycle, performance, transition, or interface state change depends on visible coordination across elements. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A rollout, renewal cycle, performance, transition, or interface state change depends on visible coordination across elements."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "I attempted to preserve a complete common-fate instance while denying visible coordinated element change, but synchronous perceptible co-variation is the exact cue that produces the grouping output.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Common Fate", "one_liner": "Group visual elements that change together — moving, flickering, or co-varying synchronously — into one perceived object, on the inference that things sharing a fate usually share an origin.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:common_fate", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "common_fate"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "common_fate", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P009-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every common-fate instance is a multi-element change whose perceptual grouping depends on visible synchronous coordination across the elements."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A rollout, renewal, performance, transition, or interface-state change depends on visible coordination across elements.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P009-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O3", "O7"], ["O1", "O3", "O8"], ["O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O2", "O3", "O7"], ["O2", "O3", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For a timing branch, the candidate must require unintended divergence in when coordinated elements act or change.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A complete cause branch is drift in timing among coordinated elements.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For a state-transition branch, the candidate must require unintended divergence in how or when elements move between states.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A complete cause branch is drift in state transition among coordinated elements.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the conditional modality and must not require that the harm has already occurred.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The consequence would follow conditionally from the drift.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this outcome branch, the candidate must connect the selected drift mechanism to confusion.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A complete outcome branch is that the drift would produce confusion.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this outcome branch, the candidate must connect the selected drift mechanism to duplicated effort.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "A complete outcome branch is that the drift would produce duplicate work.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this outcome branch, the candidate must connect the selected drift mechanism to mutually inconsistent signals.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "A complete outcome branch is that the drift would produce contradictory signals.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this outcome branch, the candidate must connect the selected drift mechanism to overload of people, channels, or processing capacity.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "A complete outcome branch is that the drift would produce overload.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this outcome branch, the candidate must connect the selected drift mechanism to reduced trust.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "A complete outcome branch is that the drift would produce loss of trust.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Drift in timing or state transition would produce confusion, duplicate work, contradictory signals, overload, or loss of trust.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "coordination drift would produce operational or interpretive harm", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P009-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A race can produce a timing-dependent wrong result without confusion, duplicate work, contradictory signals, overload, or trust loss.", "slug": "race_condition"}], "residual_id": "r:common_fate_and_synchronized_movement_design:b012_a05_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b012_a05_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A set of related elements needs to be perceived, operated, or transitioned as a coherent whole, but the relationship is not legible because elements move, change, signal, or renew at unrelated times or along incompatible trajectories. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Drift in timing or state transition would produce confusion, duplicate work, contradictory signals, overload, or loss of trust.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Drift in timing or state transition would produce confusion, duplicate work, contradictory signals, overload, or loss of trust.", "A set of related elements needs to be perceived, operated, or transitioned as a coherent whole, but the relationship is not legible because elements move, change, signal, or renew at unrelated times or along incompatible trajectories."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A race can produce a timing-dependent wrong result without confusion, duplicate work, contradictory signals, overload, or trust loss.", "slug": "race_condition"}], "normalized_requirement": "Drift in timing or state transition would produce confusion, duplicate work, contradictory signals, overload, or loss of trust.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Drift in timing or state transition would produce confusion, duplicate work, contradictory signals, overload, or loss of trust.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Observers or participants must quickly infer which elements belong together, support the same process, or participate in the same transition.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when stakeholders must see that several workstreams are part of one transition, users must perceive that interface elements belong together, or managers must keep related cycles in a useful phase relationship. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: Observers or participants must quickly infer which elements belong together, support the same process, or participate in the same transition. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Observers or participants must quickly infer which elements belong together, support the same process, or participate in the same transition.", "It is especially useful when stakeholders must see that several workstreams are part of one transition, users must perceive that interface elements belong together, or managers must keep related cycles in a useful phase relationship."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "Observers or participants must quickly infer which elements belong together, support the same process, or participate in the same transition."}, {"display_text": "Multiple teams, artifacts, populations, regions, interface elements, or operations must move through related changes without appearing fragmented.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A set of related elements needs to be perceived, operated, or transitioned as a coherent whole, but the relationship is not legible because elements move, change, signal, or renew at unrelated times or along incompatible trajectories. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: Multiple teams, artifacts, populations, regions, interface elements, or operations must move through related changes without appearing fragmented. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Multiple teams, artifacts, populations, regions, interface elements, or operations must move through related changes without appearing fragmented.", "A set of related elements needs to be perceived, operated, or transitioned as a coherent whole, but the relationship is not legible because elements move, change, signal, or renew at unrelated times or along incompatible trajectories."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "Multiple teams, artifacts, populations, regions, interface elements, or operations must move through related changes without appearing fragmented."}, {"display_text": "Exact simultaneity is tempting but may be unsafe, brittle, or unnecessarily suppress local variation.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "In many systems, deliberate staggering or decoupling is safer than exact simultaneity. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Exact simultaneity is tempting but may be unsafe, brittle, or unnecessarily suppress local variation. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Exact simultaneity is tempting but may be unsafe, brittle, or unnecessarily suppress local variation.", "In many systems, deliberate staggering or decoupling is safer than exact simultaneity."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Exact simultaneity is tempting but may be unsafe, brittle, or unnecessarily suppress local variation."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 12, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-012", "ledger_sha256": "f5911392d8a0dca4ced046a216a6e54f86850e84cb27e9ef93b7e8fc3e090ca6"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Common-Mode Failure Analysis", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:common_mode_failure_analysis", "slug": "common_mode_failure_analysis"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 3 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is that **nominal redundancy can hide a single point of failure**. A system may have many apparent backups, but those backups can be coupled through a shared dependency. That coupling can be technical, physical, institutional, economic, social, or cognitive.\n\nFor example, two data centers may be in different places but rely on the same identity provider. Two suppliers may have different names but source the same subcomponent. Two clinical workflows may appear separate but require the same record system login. Several institutional safeguards may be formally independent but rely on the same budget authority or information pipeline.\n\nThe deeper tension is between efficiency and independence. Standard platforms, common vendors, common training, centralized authority, and shared infrastructure make systems easier to manage. They also create the possibility that one cause will defeat many protections at once.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system relies on multiple components, backups, suppliers, channels, teams, safeguards, or pathways as if they were independent, but they may share a cause that can make them fail at the same time."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires duplicate critical components such that function survives fewer than all components working, under an independence assumption.", "role_mapping": "Duplicate components -> redundant paths; continued function -> safety claim.", "slug": "redundancy", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b012_a06_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Redundancy is being used as a safety or continuity claim. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Redundancy is being used as a safety or continuity claim"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Redundancy", "one_liner": "Duplicate critical components.", "page_ref": "prime:redundancy", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Duplicate components -> redundant paths; continued function -> safety claim.", "slug": "redundancy", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires duplicate critical components such that function survives fewer than all components working, under an independence assumption."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Functionally equivalent redundant components or paths are used to support a safety or continuity claim.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P009-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include multiple paths intended to provide redundancy for the same function.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A system relies on two or more redundant paths.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern independence of failure across the redundant paths rather than general component independence.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Failure events of the redundant paths are treated as independent.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require reliance on an unverified independence assumption.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The failure-independence relation is assumed.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require absence of evidence or demonstration establishing the assumed independence.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Failure independence has not been demonstrated.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the rather-than contrast between belief and demonstrated evidence.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Assumption substitutes for demonstration.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Failure independence among redundant paths is assumed rather than demonstrated.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "redundant-path failure independence is assumed without demonstration", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P009-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Redundancy relies on independence for multiplicative reliability but does not require that independence be merely assumed or untested.", "slug": "redundancy"}], "residual_id": "r:common_mode_failure_analysis:b012_a06_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b012_a06_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Independence is assumed rather than demonstrated. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Independence is assumed rather than demonstrated"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Redundancy relies on independence for multiplicative reliability but does not require that independence be merely assumed or untested.", "slug": "redundancy"}], "normalized_requirement": "Failure independence among redundant paths is assumed rather than demonstrated.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Failure independence among redundant paths is assumed rather than demonstrated.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Systemic risk requires propagation through coupling; a common exogenous cause can fail paths without any inter-path propagation.", "slug": "systemic_risk"}], "residual_id": "r:common_mode_failure_analysis:b012_a06_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b012_a06_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A shared cause could defeat several paths at once. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A shared cause could defeat several paths at once"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Systemic risk requires propagation through coupling; a common exogenous cause can fail paths without any inter-path propagation.", "slug": "systemic_risk"}], "normalized_requirement": "One shared dependency or cause can defeat several nominally independent paths at once.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "One shared dependency or cause can defeat several nominally independent paths at once.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Consequences of correlated failure are high.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when a system says, in effect, “we have a backup,” “we have two suppliers,” “we have multiple channels,” “we have separate safeguards,” or “we have redundant controls,” and the consequences of simultaneous failure would matter. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Consequences of correlated failure are high. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Consequences of correlated failure are high", "Use this archetype when a system says, in effect, “we have a backup,” “we have two suppliers,” “we have multiple channels,” “we have separate safeguards,” or “we have redundant controls,” and the consequences of simultaneous failure would matter."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Consequences of correlated failure are high"}, {"display_text": "Diversification, isolation, or explicit risk acceptance is possible.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: Diversification, isolation, or explicit risk acceptance is possible. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Diversification, isolation, or explicit risk acceptance is possible"]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Diversification, isolation, or explicit risk acceptance is possible"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 12, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-012", "ledger_sha256": "f5911392d8a0dca4ced046a216a6e54f86850e84cb27e9ef93b7e8fc3e090ca6"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Commons Governance", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:commons_governance", "slug": "commons_governance"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is distributed benefit with distributed cost. A user gets the benefit of one more fish caught, one more server job run, one more meeting scheduled, one more request filed, or one less maintenance task completed. The cost is spread across everyone as lower stock, slower access, worse quality, delayed repair, exhausted maintainers, degraded trust, or a damaged public environment.\n\nThis gap creates a race: use before others use, defer maintenance because others may do it, or push harm into a shared sink because the individual effect seems small. Left alone, the shared resource may cross thresholds where recovery is expensive or impossible.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A shared resource is vulnerable to overuse, depletion, congestion, pollution, or neglect because individual actors receive local benefits while costs, risks, maintenance burdens, or long-term damage are distributed across the group."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a common-pool resource with shared, difficult-to-exclude access by independent users.", "role_mapping": "Common-pool resource -> shared resource; users -> many actors.", "slug": "tragedy_of_the_commons", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b012_a07_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Many actors can access or affect the same resource. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Many actors can access or affect the same resource."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Tragedy of the Commons", "one_liner": "Resource depletion from self-interest.", "page_ref": "prime:tragedy_of_the_commons", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Common-pool resource -> shared resource; users -> many actors.", "slug": "tragedy_of_the_commons", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a common-pool resource with shared, difficult-to-exclude access by independent users."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Many actors can access or affect the same shared resource.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a rivalrous resource whose use diminishes availability or assimilative capacity for others.", "role_mapping": "Rivalry -> finite stock or throughput; depletion -> finite tolerance.", "slug": "tragedy_of_the_commons", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b012_a07_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The resource has finite stock, finite throughput, finite attention, finite tolerance, or finite maintenance capacity. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The resource has finite stock, finite throughput, finite attention, finite tolerance, or finite maintenance capacity."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Tragedy of the Commons", "one_liner": "Resource depletion from self-interest.", "page_ref": "prime:tragedy_of_the_commons", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Rivalry -> finite stock or throughput; depletion -> finite tolerance.", "slug": "tragedy_of_the_commons", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a rivalrous resource whose use diminishes availability or assimilative capacity for others."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The shared resource has finite stock, throughput, attention, tolerance, or maintenance capacity.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires users to capture private benefit while failing to internalize the external depletion cost imposed on others.", "role_mapping": "Private payoff -> individual use; external cost -> unborne collective cost.", "slug": "tragedy_of_the_commons", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime requires individuals to enjoy a non-excludable shared good while avoiding proportionate contribution, producing under-provision.", "role_mapping": "Shared benefit -> resource access; avoided contribution -> cost of neglect shifted to group.", "slug": "free_riding", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b012_a07_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Individual users do not automatically bear the full cost of their use or neglect. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Individual users do not automatically bear the full cost of their use or neglect."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Tragedy of the Commons", "one_liner": "Resource depletion from self-interest.", "page_ref": "prime:tragedy_of_the_commons", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Private payoff -> individual use; external cost -> unborne collective cost.", "slug": "tragedy_of_the_commons", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires users to capture private benefit while failing to internalize the external depletion cost imposed on others."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Free Riding", "one_liner": "The systematic under-provision that results when individuals can enjoy a non-excludable shared good without contributing proportionately to producing it.", "page_ref": "prime:free_riding", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Shared benefit -> resource access; avoided contribution -> cost of neglect shifted to group.", "slug": "free_riding", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires individuals to enjoy a non-excludable shared good while avoiding proportionate contribution, producing under-provision."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Individual users do not automatically bear the full collective cost of their use or neglect.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Pure exclusion, privatization, or central command would be illegitimate, impractical, or too costly.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Pure exclusion, privatization, or central command would be illegitimate, impractical, or too costly. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Pure exclusion, privatization, or central command would be illegitimate, impractical, or too costly."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Pure exclusion, privatization, or central command would be illegitimate, impractical, or too costly."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 12, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-012", "ledger_sha256": "f5911392d8a0dca4ced046a216a6e54f86850e84cb27e9ef93b7e8fc3e090ca6"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Compact Transit, In-Situ Expansion", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:compact_transit_in_situ_expansion", "slug": "compact_transit_in_situ_expansion"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 2 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 2}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Access and function impose incompatible geometry. A permanently small device can pass\nbut cannot perform; a deployed-size device performs but cannot enter. Disassembling the\nsystem into loose parts may destroy registration, cleanliness, or remote deployability.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "The geometry required for operation cannot pass through the available access boundary, while a permanently compact geometry cannot perform the required function."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "This branch preserves the complete remedy-free diagnostic route; goals, feasibility clauses, gates, deployment constraints, and supporting context remain outside the DNF."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "EXT001-C015", "dnf": [["EXT001-U015-O1"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"obligation_id": "EXT001-U015-O1", "predicate": "The working geometry cannot pass through the available opening."}], "predicate": "The working geometry cannot pass through the available opening.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "The working geometry cannot pass through the available opening.", "unit_id": "EXT001-U015"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"catalog_exhaustion": "CONDITION_LEVEL", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The working geometry cannot pass through the available opening.", "slug": "fold"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The working geometry cannot pass through the available opening.", "slug": "sandboxing"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The working geometry cannot pass through the available opening.", "slug": "open_closed_principle"}], "residual_id": "EXT001:compact_transit_in_situ_expansion:C01", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding."}}, "condition_id": "ext001_compact_transit_in_situ_expansion_a01", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: The working geometry cannot pass through the available opening.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The working geometry cannot pass through the available opening."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The working geometry cannot pass through the available opening.", "slug": "fold"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The working geometry cannot pass through the available opening.", "slug": "sandboxing"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The working geometry cannot pass through the available opening.", "slug": "open_closed_principle"}], "normalized_requirement": "The working geometry cannot pass through the available opening.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The working geometry cannot pass through the available opening.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "EXT001-C016", "dnf": [["EXT001-U016-O1"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"obligation_id": "EXT001-U016-O1", "predicate": "A geometry small enough for transit cannot perform the required function."}], "predicate": "A geometry small enough for transit cannot perform the required function.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A geometry small enough for transit cannot perform the required function.", "unit_id": "EXT001-U016"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"catalog_exhaustion": "CONDITION_LEVEL", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: A geometry small enough for transit cannot perform the required function.", "slug": "anna_karenina_principle"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: A geometry small enough for transit cannot perform the required function.", "slug": "disjointness"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: A geometry small enough for transit cannot perform the required function.", "slug": "axiomatic_incompatibility"}], "residual_id": "EXT001:compact_transit_in_situ_expansion:C02", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding."}}, "condition_id": "ext001_compact_transit_in_situ_expansion_a02", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: A geometry small enough for transit cannot perform the required function.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A geometry small enough for transit cannot perform the required function."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: A geometry small enough for transit cannot perform the required function.", "slug": "anna_karenina_principle"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: A geometry small enough for transit cannot perform the required function.", "slug": "disjointness"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: A geometry small enough for transit cannot perform the required function.", "slug": "axiomatic_incompatibility"}], "normalized_requirement": "A geometry small enough for transit cannot perform the required function.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A geometry small enough for transit cannot perform the required function.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The system can undergo a controlled expansion and stabilization transition beyond the boundary.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: The system can undergo a controlled expansion and stabilization transition beyond the boundary. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The system can undergo a controlled expansion and stabilization transition beyond the boundary.", "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "The system can undergo a controlled expansion and stabilization transition beyond the boundary."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"candidate_ledger_sha256": "96f72d2139077fd57bf795048ebef33b3fd574b20963170080ec916b5b3b92fe", "extension_id": "new-archetypes-extension-001", "ledger_id": "prime-production-v1.2-extension-001", "ledger_sha256": "9644520614744632d1d36da44b1acd77ce432852c6083eb871203521c166efce"}, "base_projection_sha256": "841e0c7f3cb8e8054475ad29a8a14745a416b4fc115559a44878b94292e673ec", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "ca09ed9fe1598ce7072755b530de5553f5ee0a7cd64ae82d9e4a4e2149a37788", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Comparative Advantage Specialization", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:comparative_advantage_specialization", "slug": "comparative_advantage_specialization"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 2 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 2}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is misassignment under hidden opportunity cost. A system may assign tasks to whoever is absolutely strongest, whoever historically owned the work, whoever has status, or whoever happens to be available. Those assignments can look reasonable locally while wasting system capacity globally.\n\nThe danger is that absolute ability hides displacement cost. A senior expert may do a routine task well, but the cost is the expert work they did not do. A less expert actor may complete the routine task adequately while giving up much less valuable alternative work. Comparative advantage makes that hidden comparison explicit.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Work is allocated by habit, status, absolute skill, local ownership, politics, or equal rotation even though different actors face different opportunity costs across tasks. The result is avoidable loss of total output, duplicated effort, blocked exchange, or misused scarce capability."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime defines advantage by lower relative opportunity cost across agents and goods, independent of absolute productivity.", "role_mapping": "Agents/goods -> actors/tasks; relative productivity ratio -> opportunity-cost difference.", "slug": "comparative_advantage", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b012_a08_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Actors, teams, units, or partners differ in relative opportunity costs, constraints, learning curves, or context advantages. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Actors, teams, units, or partners differ in relative opportunity costs, constraints, learning curves, or context advantages."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Comparative Advantage", "one_liner": "Efficient specialization.", "page_ref": "prime:comparative_advantage", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Agents/goods -> actors/tasks; relative productivity ratio -> opportunity-cost difference.", "slug": "comparative_advantage", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime defines advantage by lower relative opportunity cost across agents and goods, independent of absolute productivity."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Actors differ in relative opportunity costs across at least two tasks or outputs.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Comparative advantage can already govern an efficient allocation and does not require current misassignment.", "slug": "comparative_advantage"}], "residual_id": "r:comparative_advantage_specialization:b012_a08_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b012_a08_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Current assignment is based on who is best in absolute terms, who already owns the work, who is available first, or who has political claim. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Current assignment is based on who is best in absolute terms, who already owns the work, who is available first, or who has political claim."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Comparative advantage can already govern an efficient allocation and does not require current misassignment.", "slug": "comparative_advantage"}], "normalized_requirement": "Current assignment follows absolute skill, incumbent ownership, first availability, or political claim rather than relative opportunity cost.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Current assignment follows absolute skill, incumbent ownership, first availability, or political claim rather than relative opportunity cost.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Tasks, functions, or services can be divided without destroying their value.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: Tasks, functions, or services can be divided without destroying their value. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Tasks, functions, or services can be divided without destroying their value."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "Tasks, functions, or services can be divided without destroying their value."}, {"display_text": "Specialized outputs can be exchanged, handed off, integrated, or recombined.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Local assignment habits optimize visible ability or ownership, while system-level value depends on relative opportunity cost, exchangeability, and the cost of coordinating specialized outputs. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: Specialized outputs can be exchanged, handed off, integrated, or recombined. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Specialized outputs can be exchanged, handed off, integrated, or recombined.", "Local assignment habits optimize visible ability or ownership, while system-level value depends on relative opportunity cost, exchangeability, and the cost of coordinating specialized outputs."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Specialized outputs can be exchanged, handed off, integrated, or recombined."}, {"display_text": "The cost of coordination is lower than the expected gain from specialization.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this deployment constraint: The cost of coordination is lower than the expected gain from specialization. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The cost of coordination is lower than the expected gain from specialization."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The cost of coordination is lower than the expected gain from specialization."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 12, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-012", "ledger_sha256": "f5911392d8a0dca4ced046a216a6e54f86850e84cb27e9ef93b7e8fc3e090ca6"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Comparative Benchmark Validation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:comparative_benchmark_validation", "slug": "comparative_benchmark_validation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 4, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 5 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 4 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system, model, process, product, intervention, or claim is judged in isolation, against an implicit standard, or against a selectively chosen baseline. Without an explicit and legitimate comparator, stakeholders cannot tell whether the observed performance is adequate, superior, equivalent, misleadingly framed, or merely better than a weak alternative.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system, model, process, product, intervention, or claim is judged in isolation, against an implicit standard, or against a selectively chosen baseline. Without an explicit and legitimate comparator, stakeholders cannot tell whether the observed performance is adequate, superior, equivalent, misleadingly framed, or merely better than a weak alternative."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Validation is an evaluation process and does not require a preexisting claim with this content.", "slug": "validation"}], "residual_id": "r:comparative_benchmark_validation:b012_a09_c1", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b012_a09_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A party claims that a system is accurate, safe, robust, efficient, useful, compliant, equivalent, non-inferior, state-of-the-art, or ready to replace an incumbent. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A party claims that a system is accurate, safe, robust, efficient, useful, compliant, equivalent, non-inferior, state-of-the-art, or ready to replace an incumbent."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Validation is an evaluation process and does not require a preexisting claim with this content.", "slug": "validation"}], "normalized_requirement": "A party claims a system is accurate, safe, robust, efficient, useful, compliant, equivalent, superior, or ready to replace an incumbent.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A party claims a system is accurate, safe, robust, efficient, useful, compliant, equivalent, superior, or ready to replace an incumbent.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A metric can depend on operating conditions without the pooled-versus-stratified association structure required by the prime.", "slug": "simpson_yule_effect"}], "residual_id": "r:comparative_benchmark_validation:b012_a09_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b012_a09_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The raw metric is uninterpretable without comparison because task difficulty, population mix, operating conditions, or measurement method affects the result. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The raw metric is uninterpretable without comparison because task difficulty, population mix, operating conditions, or measurement method affects the result."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A metric can depend on operating conditions without the pooled-versus-stratified association structure required by the prime.", "slug": "simpson_yule_effect"}], "normalized_requirement": "A raw metric changes with task difficulty, population mix, operating conditions, or measurement method and is not interpretable in isolation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A raw metric changes with task difficulty, population mix, operating conditions, or measurement method and is not interpretable in isolation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Validation is an evaluation process and does not require a preexisting claim with this content.", "slug": "validation"}], "residual_id": "r:comparative_benchmark_validation:b012_a09_c1", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b012_a09_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A party claims that a system is accurate, safe, robust, efficient, useful, compliant, equivalent, non-inferior, state-of-the-art, or ready to replace an incumbent. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A party claims that a system is accurate, safe, robust, efficient, useful, compliant, equivalent, non-inferior, state-of-the-art, or ready to replace an incumbent."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Validation is an evaluation process and does not require a preexisting claim with this content.", "slug": "validation"}], "normalized_requirement": "A party claims a system is accurate, safe, robust, efficient, useful, compliant, equivalent, superior, or ready to replace an incumbent.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A party claims a system is accurate, safe, robust, efficient, useful, compliant, equivalent, superior, or ready to replace an incumbent.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Systematic case comparison can support causal inference without an adoption choice among alternatives.", "slug": "comparative_method"}], "residual_id": "r:comparative_benchmark_validation:b012_a09_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b012_a09_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Multiple alternatives are plausible, and the choice depends on relative rather than absolute performance. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Multiple alternatives are plausible, and the choice depends on relative rather than absolute performance."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Systematic case comparison can support causal inference without an adoption choice among alternatives.", "slug": "comparative_method"}], "normalized_requirement": "Several alternatives are plausible and the choice depends on relative rather than absolute performance.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Several alternatives are plausible and the choice depends on relative rather than absolute performance.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Validation is an evaluation process and does not require a preexisting claim with this content.", "slug": "validation"}], "residual_id": "r:comparative_benchmark_validation:b012_a09_c1", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b012_a09_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A party claims that a system is accurate, safe, robust, efficient, useful, compliant, equivalent, non-inferior, state-of-the-art, or ready to replace an incumbent. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A party claims that a system is accurate, safe, robust, efficient, useful, compliant, equivalent, non-inferior, state-of-the-art, or ready to replace an incumbent."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Validation is an evaluation process and does not require a preexisting claim with this content.", "slug": "validation"}], "normalized_requirement": "A party claims a system is accurate, safe, robust, efficient, useful, compliant, equivalent, superior, or ready to replace an incumbent.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A party claims a system is accurate, safe, robust, efficient, useful, compliant, equivalent, superior, or ready to replace an incumbent.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a pooled association to reverse, vanish, or appear after a confounder with uneven subgroup distribution is collapsed away.", "role_mapping": "Subgroups/regimes -> strata; pooled score -> undifferentiated score; marginal-conditional gap -> insufficiency.", "slug": "simpson_yule_effect", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime requires every subgroup association to run opposite the aggregate because a confounder's composition term is mixed away.", "role_mapping": "Subgroups -> partitions; aggregate score -> undifferentiated score; sign reversal -> insufficiency.", "slug": "simpsons_paradox", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b012_a09_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Performance may vary across subgroups, regimes, scenarios, tasks, or use conditions, so a single undifferentiated score is insufficient. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Performance may vary across subgroups, regimes, scenarios, tasks, or use conditions, so a single undifferentiated score is insufficient."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Simpson–Yule Effect", "one_liner": "An association measured in pooled data can reverse, vanish, or appear once the data are partitioned by a confounder unevenly distributed across the compared groups.", "page_ref": "prime:simpson_yule_effect", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Subgroups/regimes -> strata; pooled score -> undifferentiated score; marginal-conditional gap -> insufficiency.", "slug": "simpson_yule_effect", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a pooled association to reverse, vanish, or appear after a confounder with uneven subgroup distribution is collapsed away."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Simpson's Paradox", "one_liner": "A relationship can run one direction inside every subgroup and the opposite direction in the aggregate, because a confounder's distribution differs across subgroups and is silently mixed away on pooling.", "page_ref": "prime:simpsons_paradox", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Subgroups -> partitions; aggregate score -> undifferentiated score; sign reversal -> insufficiency.", "slug": "simpsons_paradox", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires every subgroup association to run opposite the aggregate because a confounder's composition term is mixed away."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Performance may vary across subgroups, regimes, scenarios, tasks, or use conditions, so one undifferentiated score is insufficient.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Validation is an evaluation process and does not require a preexisting claim with this content.", "slug": "validation"}], "residual_id": "r:comparative_benchmark_validation:b012_a09_c1", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b012_a09_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A party claims that a system is accurate, safe, robust, efficient, useful, compliant, equivalent, non-inferior, state-of-the-art, or ready to replace an incumbent. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A party claims that a system is accurate, safe, robust, efficient, useful, compliant, equivalent, non-inferior, state-of-the-art, or ready to replace an incumbent."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Validation is an evaluation process and does not require a preexisting claim with this content.", "slug": "validation"}], "normalized_requirement": "A party claims a system is accurate, safe, robust, efficient, useful, compliant, equivalent, superior, or ready to replace an incumbent.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A party claims a system is accurate, safe, robust, efficient, useful, compliant, equivalent, superior, or ready to replace an incumbent.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P009-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"], ["O1", "O3"], ["O1", "O4"], ["O1", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern an evaluation already performed rather than a proposed future assessment.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The evidence practice was used in a prior evaluation.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must require evaluative reliance on tests controlled within the evaluated organization or system.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A complete branch is that the prior evaluation relies on internally produced tests.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must require evaluative reliance on examples selected for convenience rather than representativeness.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A complete branch is that the prior evaluation relies on convenience examples.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must require evaluative reliance on metrics chosen by the evaluated party or process.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A complete branch is that the prior evaluation relies on self-selected metrics.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must require evaluative reliance on claims lacking independent verification.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "A complete branch is that the prior evaluation relies on unverified claims.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Prior evaluation relies on internal tests, convenience examples, self-selected metrics, or unverified claims.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "prior evaluation relies on internally controlled or unverified evidence", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P009-C13-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A holdout is a remedy against reuse contamination and does not entail that prior evaluation used convenience examples.", "slug": "holdout_set"}], "residual_id": "r:comparative_benchmark_validation:b012_a09_c7", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b012_a09_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Prior evaluation has relied on internal tests, convenience examples, self-selected metrics, or unverified claims. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Prior evaluation has relied on internal tests, convenience examples, self-selected metrics, or unverified claims."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A holdout is a remedy against reuse contamination and does not entail that prior evaluation used convenience examples.", "slug": "holdout_set"}], "normalized_requirement": "Prior evaluation relies on internal tests, convenience examples, self-selected metrics, or unverified claims.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Prior evaluation relies on internal tests, convenience examples, self-selected metrics, or unverified claims.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A reference standard, gold standard, accepted incumbent, competitor baseline, benchmark dataset, case suite, or standard-of-care alternative exists or can be constructed.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system, model, process, product, intervention, or claim is judged in isolation, against an implicit standard, or against a selectively chosen baseline. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: A reference standard, gold standard, accepted incumbent, competitor baseline, benchmark dataset, case suite, or standard-of-care alternative exists or can be constructed. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A reference standard, gold standard, accepted incumbent, competitor baseline, benchmark dataset, case suite, or standard-of-care alternative exists or can be constructed.", "A system, model, process, product, intervention, or claim is judged in isolation, against an implicit standard, or against a selectively chosen baseline."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "A reference standard, gold standard, accepted incumbent, competitor baseline, benchmark dataset, case suite, or standard-of-care alternative exists or can be constructed."}, {"display_text": "Stakeholders must decide adoption, approval, deployment, publication, procurement, replacement, certification, or escalation.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: Stakeholders must decide adoption, approval, deployment, publication, procurement, replacement, certification, or escalation. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders must decide adoption, approval, deployment, publication, procurement, replacement, certification, or escalation."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Stakeholders must decide adoption, approval, deployment, publication, procurement, replacement, certification, or escalation."}, {"display_text": "The cost of false validation is high enough that an auditable external reference frame is needed.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Validation needs a stable reference frame, but reference frames can be wrong, stale, gamed, selectively chosen, or mismatched to the actual decision. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: The cost of false validation is high enough that an auditable external reference frame is needed. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The cost of false validation is high enough that an auditable external reference frame is needed.", "Validation needs a stable reference frame, but reference frames can be wrong, stale, gamed, selectively chosen, or mismatched to the actual decision."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 8, "text": "The cost of false validation is high enough that an auditable external reference frame is needed."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 12, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-012", "ledger_sha256": "f5911392d8a0dca4ced046a216a6e54f86850e84cb27e9ef93b7e8fc3e090ca6"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Compatibility Management", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:compatibility_management", "slug": "compatibility_management"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 5 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is unmanaged coexistence. Different actors, artifacts, or systems occupy different versions, but the relationship among those versions is implicit. One team may assume everyone has upgraded. Another may depend on old behavior. A third may use a transitional workaround that no one has tested. The system then fails not because any one version is incoherent, but because interaction across versions is underdesigned.\n\nThis creates several recurring symptoms: breaking changes appear as surprises, old versions become indefinite maintenance burdens, support commitments are unclear, migration is postponed until crisis, and adapters or workarounds accumulate outside governance.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Different actors, systems, or components use different versions, and unmanaged version differences create failure or fragmentation."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P009-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include temporally or version-distinct old and new forms of the same general artifact class.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An ecosystem contains an old form and a corresponding new form of a versioned artifact, rule, schema, product, or workflow.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail overlapping presence or operation of both forms, not simple replacement.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The old and new forms coexist operationally.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must place both forms in the same interacting environment rather than separate unrelated settings.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The coexistence occurs within one shared ecosystem.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the necessity of coexistence and not merely its possibility.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Coexistence of the old and new forms is required.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "Old and new versions, rules, schemas, products, or workflows must coexist in one ecosystem.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "old and new artifact forms must coexist in the same ecosystem", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P009-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Tracking artifact history does not require multiple versions to remain operational in one ecosystem.", "slug": "versioning"}], "residual_id": "r:compatibility_management:b012_a10_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b012_a10_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Old and new versions, rules, schemas, products, or workflows must coexist in the same ecosystem. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Old and new versions, rules, schemas, products, or workflows must coexist in the same ecosystem."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Tracking artifact history does not require multiple versions to remain operational in one ecosystem.", "slug": "versioning"}], "normalized_requirement": "Old and new versions, rules, schemas, products, or workflows must coexist in one ecosystem.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Old and new versions, rules, schemas, products, or workflows must coexist in one ecosystem.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P009-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include more than one dependent that must move from one version, regime, or platform to another.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Multiple dependent actors, systems, or components face a migration.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the universal impossibility of simultaneous migration, not merely a preference for staging.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "It is not possible for all dependents to migrate at the same time.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must connect cross-dependent cost differences to the impossibility of one-time migration.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A complete branch is that differing costs among dependents prevent simultaneous migration.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must connect cross-dependent timing differences to the impossibility of one-time migration.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A complete branch is that differing timing constraints among dependents prevent simultaneous migration.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must connect cross-dependent authority differences to the impossibility of one-time migration.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "A complete branch is that differing authority among dependents prevents simultaneous migration.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must connect cross-dependent risk differences to the impossibility of one-time migration.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "A complete branch is that differing risk among dependents prevents simultaneous migration.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must connect cross-dependent capacity differences to the impossibility of one-time migration.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "A complete branch is that differing capacity among dependents prevents simultaneous migration.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Dependents cannot all migrate simultaneously because cost, timing, authority, risk, or capacity differs.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "heterogeneous dependent constraints prevent simultaneous migration", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P009-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Independent sender and receiver strictness does not require a staggered version migration.", "slug": "asymmetric_interface_tolerance"}], "residual_id": "r:compatibility_management:b012_a10_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b012_a10_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Dependents cannot all migrate at the same moment because of cost, timing, authority, risk, or unequal capacity. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Dependents cannot all migrate at the same moment because of cost, timing, authority, risk, or unequal capacity."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Independent sender and receiver strictness does not require a staggered version migration.", "slug": "asymmetric_interface_tolerance"}], "normalized_requirement": "Dependents cannot all migrate simultaneously because cost, timing, authority, risk, or capacity differs.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Dependents cannot all migrate simultaneously because cost, timing, authority, risk, or capacity differs.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P010-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require a contemplated version change rather than an unrelated operational change.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The source role is a proposed change to a versioned artifact, interface, rule, or system.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must allow direct effect on an existing user as well as effect on an existing integration, obligation, record, workflow, or expectation; it must not require a pre-existing user relationship or reliance relation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The directly affected role is an existing integration, obligation, record, workflow, expectation, user, or comparable affected item or person.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must make the proposed version change a source of the breakage or user-harm risk rather than merely co-located with it.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The proposed version change is capable of breaking the affected item or disrupting or harming the affected user.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve prospective possibility and must not require actual completed breakage or harm.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Breakage or user harm is possible, not asserted as already completed or certain.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "A proposed version change may break existing integrations, obligations, records, workflows, expectations, or users.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "a proposed version change may break an existing affected item or harm a user", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P010-C01-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Compatible artifacts interoperate; the prime does not entail that a proposed change will break installed dependents.", "slug": "compatibility"}], "residual_id": "r:compatibility_management:b012_a10_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b012_a10_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A proposed change may break existing integrations, obligations, records, workflows, expectations, or users. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A proposed change may break existing integrations, obligations, records, workflows, expectations, or users."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Compatible artifacts interoperate; the prime does not entail that a proposed change will break installed dependents.", "slug": "compatibility"}], "normalized_requirement": "A proposed version change may break existing integrations, obligations, records, workflows, expectations, or users.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A proposed version change may break existing integrations, obligations, records, workflows, expectations, or users.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P010-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require multiple interpreters rather than uncertainty within one actor.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "At least two distinct actors interpret the artifact.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve identity of the interpreted object across the actors.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The actors interpret one common artifact rather than different artifacts.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must connect version assumptions to interpretation of the shared artifact.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Each actor's interpretation of the artifact is conditioned by an assumption about its version.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail a consequential difference between the version assumptions used by the interpreters.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The actors' version assumptions are mutually incompatible rather than aligned.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Different actors interpret one artifact through incompatible version assumptions.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Multiple actors interpret the same artifact under incompatible version assumptions.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P010-C02-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Compatibility can be established and version assumptions aligned rather than divergent.", "slug": "compatibility"}], "residual_id": "r:compatibility_management:b012_a10_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b012_a10_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Different actors interpret the same artifact through different version assumptions. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Different actors interpret the same artifact through different version assumptions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A counterexample preserving a complete dll_hell instance while falsifying the selected DNF branch was attempted; the exact record makes the retained branch obligations constitutive, so none survives.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "DLL Hell", "one_liner": "The failure mode where programs share dynamic libraries through one global single-version-wins namespace, so an unrelated install overwrites a version another program depends on and silently breaks it — cured by breaking the single-version-wins invariant.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:dll_hell", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "dll_hell"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "dll_hell", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P010-C02-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every DLL-hell instance requires multiple clients to resolve one shared library artifact under incompatible version assumptions, satisfying the complete branch without a qualifier."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Different actors interpret one artifact through incompatible version assumptions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P010-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern continuing support for an older version or strict legacy subtype.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An older or legacy version remains under support.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail a burden from continued support rather than merely the existence of an older version.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Maintaining that legacy support imposes a material cost.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve abrupt withdrawal rather than a gradual managed transition.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The evaluated withdrawal of legacy support is sudden or abrupt.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must make sudden withdrawal the cause of the adverse consequence.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Abrupt removal of the legacy support would cause harm or disruption.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve what would follow from sudden removal, not require that removal has occurred.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The removal consequence is an expected counterfactual consequence rather than an already completed event.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail an unacceptable consequence rather than any minor transition cost.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The expected harm or disruption exceeds the applicable acceptability threshold.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Legacy support is costly while sudden removal would cause unacceptable harm or disruption.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Legacy-version support is costly, but abrupt withdrawal would cause unacceptable adverse consequences.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P010-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Version tracking need not include ongoing legacy support or costly removal.", "slug": "versioning"}], "residual_id": "r:compatibility_management:b012_a10_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b012_a10_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Support for older versions is costly but sudden removal would create unacceptable harm or disruption. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Support for older versions is costly but sudden removal would create unacceptable harm or disruption."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Version tracking need not include ongoing legacy support or costly removal.", "slug": "versioning"}], "normalized_requirement": "Legacy support is costly while sudden removal would cause unacceptable harm or disruption.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Legacy support is costly while sudden removal would cause unacceptable harm or disruption.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 12, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-012", "ledger_sha256": "f5911392d8a0dca4ced046a216a6e54f86850e84cb27e9ef93b7e8fc3e090ca6"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Compensating Transaction", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:compensating_transaction", "slug": "compensating_transaction"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 5, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is irreversible partial completion. A process crosses a boundary before the whole process succeeds. Once that boundary is crossed, a simple abort cannot remove all effects. Someone may have relied on the action, a record may need to remain traceable, a legal duty may have arisen, or a human experience may already have occurred.\n\nThis creates a residue: the system is neither simply successful nor cleanly failed. Without a compensating structure, that residue becomes manual cleanup, hidden support debt, dispute, unfairness, data inconsistency, or unresolved harm.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A multi-step or grouped process can partially complete in ways that cannot be exactly reversed, leaving the system, parties, records, or obligations in an unacceptable intermediate state."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P010-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O9"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include a process and an effect attributable to that process.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A process is the source of a realized effect.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require an effect that has crossed into a committed, consumed, disclosed, or otherwise realized state.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The effect has already become realized rather than remaining merely planned or possible.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail failure of exact erasure, not merely costly or inconvenient reversal.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The realized effect cannot be erased.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only if the process has made a local commit that cannot be erased.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A complete branch is that the irreversible realized effect is a local commit.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only if the process has caused an external side effect that cannot be erased.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "A complete branch is that the irreversible realized effect is an external side effect.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only if the process has consumed a resource in a way that cannot be erased.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "A complete branch is that the irreversible realized effect is a consumed resource.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only if the process has disclosed information that cannot be made undisclosed.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "A complete branch is that the irreversible realized effect is disclosed information.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only if the process has produced a legal consequence that cannot be erased.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "A complete branch is that the irreversible realized effect is a legal consequence.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only if the process has produced a human impact that cannot be erased.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "A complete branch is that the irreversible realized effect is a human impact.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A process has a local commit, external side effect, consumed resource, disclosure, legal consequence, or human impact that cannot be erased.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "a process has at least one named realized effect that cannot be erased", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P010-C04-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Later information contaminating a time-indexed reconstruction is not an irreversible operational side effect.", "slug": "past_state_contamination"}], "residual_id": "r:compensating_transaction:b012_a11_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b012_a11_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A process has local commits, external side effects, consumed resources, disclosed information, legal consequences, or human impacts that cannot be erased. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A process has local commits, external side effects, consumed resources, disclosed information, legal consequences, or human impacts that cannot be erased."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Later information contaminating a time-indexed reconstruction is not an irreversible operational side effect.", "slug": "past_state_contamination"}], "normalized_requirement": "A process has committed side effects, consumed resources, disclosures, legal consequences, or human impacts that cannot be erased.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A process has committed side effects, consumed resources, disclosures, legal consequences, or human impacts that cannot be erased.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P010-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require a process spanning a boundary that separates control over its effects.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A process produces effects across an organizational, technical, legal, temporal, physical, or comparable control boundary.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must connect cross-boundary operation to distributed effects rather than merely geographic movement.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The process crossing distributes its effects across the separated sides or control domains.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must deny complete rollback authority to every individual actor, not merely describe shared participation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "No single actor controls reversal of the complete set of effects.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve inability to perform full central rollback, not only increased cost or delay.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Central reversal of every process effect by one actor is impossible in the stated arrangement.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "The process crosses boundaries where no one actor can centrally reverse every effect.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A boundary-crossing process distributes effects beyond any one actor's complete rollback authority.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P010-C05-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A self-binding sunk cost does not require distributed boundary-crossing effects.", "slug": "sunk_cost_and_irreversible_commitment"}], "residual_id": "r:compensating_transaction:b012_a11_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b012_a11_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The system crosses organizational, technical, legal, temporal, or physical boundaries where one actor cannot centrally roll back every effect. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The system crosses organizational, technical, legal, temporal, or physical boundaries where one actor cannot centrally roll back every effect."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A self-binding sunk cost does not require distributed boundary-crossing effects.", "slug": "sunk_cost_and_irreversible_commitment"}], "normalized_requirement": "The process crosses boundaries where no one actor can centrally reverse every effect.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The process crosses boundaries where no one actor can centrally reverse every effect.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P010-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require at least two ordered stages in one process.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A process contains an earlier step and a later step.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve possible later-step failure rather than require either guaranteed success or completed failure.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The later step is capable of failing.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail that the earlier consequence is already established when later failure can occur.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The earlier step acquires its branch-specific status before the possible failure of the later step.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail external visibility of the earlier step before later failure.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A complete branch is that the earlier step has become visible to an external or affected observer.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail a binding commitment created by the earlier step before later failure.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "A complete branch is that the earlier step has become binding on a relevant party or system.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail recording of the earlier step before later failure.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "A complete branch is that the earlier step has entered an authoritative or persistent record.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail reliance on the earlier step before later failure.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "A complete branch is that another party or process has relied upon the earlier step.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "A later step can fail after an earlier step has become visible, binding, recorded, or relied upon.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A later process step can fail after an earlier step has acquired an externally consequential status.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P010-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Returning to an earlier search state does not require an externally visible partial commit.", "slug": "backtracking"}], "residual_id": "r:compensating_transaction:b012_a11_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b012_a11_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A later step can fail after an earlier step has already become visible, binding, recorded, or relied upon. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A later step can fail after an earlier step has already become visible, binding, recorded, or relied upon."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Returning to an earlier search state does not require an externally visible partial commit.", "slug": "backtracking"}], "normalized_requirement": "A later step can fail after an earlier step has become visible, binding, recorded, or relied upon.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A later step can fail after an earlier step has become visible, binding, recorded, or relied upon.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P010-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require rollback to a saved state rather than an unrelated corrective action.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The evaluated operation restores a process or system to a saved earlier state.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail that rollback would produce the consequence, not that the consequence is merely possible for another reason.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The branch consequence is an expected result of performing the rollback.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must make rollback cause loss of valid intervening work.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A complete branch is that restoring the saved state would erase legitimate work completed after that state.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail obligation violation as a consequence of the rollback.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A complete branch is that restoring the saved state would put the process or actor in violation of an obligation.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail failure of rollback to provide the required repair to an affected party.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "A complete branch is that restoring the saved state would not repair the party affected by the original process effects.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Restoring a saved state would lose legitimate subsequent work, violate obligations, or fail to repair the affected party.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Saved-state rollback would produce at least one specified external inadequacy.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P010-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Search-state restoration does not account for legitimate external work or obligations created after the checkpoint.", "slug": "backtracking"}], "residual_id": "r:compensating_transaction:b012_a11_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b012_a11_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A saved-state rollback would lose legitimate subsequent work, violate obligations, or fail to repair the affected party. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A saved-state rollback would lose legitimate subsequent work, violate obligations, or fail to repair the affected party."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Search-state restoration does not account for legitimate external work or obligations created after the checkpoint.", "slug": "backtracking"}], "normalized_requirement": "Restoring a saved state would lose legitimate subsequent work, violate obligations, or fail to repair the affected party.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Restoring a saved state would lose legitimate subsequent work, violate obligations, or fail to repair the affected party.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "Partial completion creates durable external obligations that require a semantically compensating action because exact rollback is impossible.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Partial completion creates durable external obligations that require a semantically compensating action because exact rollback is impossible.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Operational reality requires repair, cure, credit, reversal, reconciliation, or remediation rather than pure abort.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use Compensating Transaction when the repair must be a counteraction, cure, offset, or reconciliation rather than an exact rewind. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: Operational reality requires repair, cure, credit, reversal, reconciliation, or remediation rather than pure abort. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Operational reality requires repair, cure, credit, reversal, reconciliation, or remediation rather than pure abort.", "Use Compensating Transaction when the repair must be a counteraction, cure, offset, or reconciliation rather than an exact rewind."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Operational reality requires repair, cure, credit, reversal, reconciliation, or remediation rather than pure abort."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 12, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-012", "ledger_sha256": "f5911392d8a0dca4ced046a216a6e54f86850e84cb27e9ef93b7e8fc3e090ca6"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Compensation-Aware Safeguard Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:compensation_aware_safeguard_design", "slug": "compensation_aware_safeguard_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A safeguard is introduced to reduce the cost, likelihood, or severity of failure. Because the protected actor experiences the action as safer, cheaper, reversible, insured, backed up, or less punishable, they may increase risky behavior until part of the intended gain disappears. The problem is not merely that actors are irrational or reckless. The safeguard changes the payoff surface and perceived failure boundary, and the system lacks controls for the behavioral response.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A safeguard is introduced to reduce the cost, likelihood, or severity of failure. Because the protected actor experiences the action as safer, cheaper, reversible, insured, backed up, or less punishable, they may increase risky behavior until part of the intended gain disappears. The problem is not merely that actors are irrational or reckless. The safeguard changes the payoff surface and perceived failure boundary, and the system lacks controls for the behavioral response."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a cost-lowering safeguard applied to an exposure-choosing agent with an implicit risk budget.", "role_mapping": "Safeguard -> protection; failure-cost reduction -> perceived downside; agent -> exposure chooser.", "slug": "peltzman_effect", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b012_a12_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A protective measure, backup, insurance layer, safety device, automated aid, compliance shield, guarantee, or fail-safe reduces perceived downside for an actor who still controls exposure. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A protective measure, backup, insurance layer, safety device, automated aid, compliance shield, guarantee, or fail-safe reduces perceived downside for an actor who still controls exposure."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Peltzman Effect", "one_liner": "When a safeguard lowers the cost of failure, an agent reallocates the freed risk-budget into riskier behavior, partly offsetting the intended gain.", "page_ref": "prime:peltzman_effect", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Safeguard -> protection; failure-cost reduction -> perceived downside; agent -> exposure chooser.", "slug": "peltzman_effect", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a cost-lowering safeguard applied to an exposure-choosing agent with an implicit risk budget."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A safeguard lowers perceived downside for an actor who still chooses exposure.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a free re-optimization channel through which the protected agent reallocates released risk budget into riskier behavior.", "role_mapping": "Behavioral re-optimization -> changed exposure; risk budget -> behavior increase.", "slug": "peltzman_effect", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b012_a12_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The actor can change behavior after protection is added: speed, leverage, load, volume, complexity, frequency, shortcutting, monitoring effort, or boundary pushing. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The actor can change behavior after protection is added: speed, leverage, load, volume, complexity, frequency, shortcutting, monitoring effort, or boundary pushing."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Peltzman Effect", "one_liner": "When a safeguard lowers the cost of failure, an agent reallocates the freed risk-budget into riskier behavior, partly offsetting the intended gain.", "page_ref": "prime:peltzman_effect", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Behavioral re-optimization -> changed exposure; risk budget -> behavior increase.", "slug": "peltzman_effect", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a free re-optimization channel through which the protected agent reallocates released risk budget into riskier behavior."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "After protection is added, the actor can increase speed, leverage, load, frequency, complexity, shortcutting, or boundary pushing.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires an exposure-choosing agent free to adjust behavior under the new cost constraint.", "role_mapping": "Free re-optimization -> behavior not fixed; actor -> protected user.", "slug": "peltzman_effect", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b012_a12_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The post-safeguard behavior is not fully fixed by physical constraints, law, contract, or strong norms. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The post-safeguard behavior is not fully fixed by physical constraints, law, contract, or strong norms."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Peltzman Effect", "one_liner": "When a safeguard lowers the cost of failure, an agent reallocates the freed risk-budget into riskier behavior, partly offsetting the intended gain.", "page_ref": "prime:peltzman_effect", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Free re-optimization -> behavior not fixed; actor -> protected user.", "slug": "peltzman_effect", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires an exposure-choosing agent free to adjust behavior under the new cost constraint."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Post-safeguard behavior remains free enough to change rather than being fully fixed by law, contract, physics, or strong norms.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires an intervention's direct gain to induce a coupled behavioral or exposure response that erodes aggregate benefit and must be measured separately.", "role_mapping": "Direct gain -> local safety; induced response -> offset; displacement site -> other channel/time/population.", "slug": "counterresponse_offset", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime's accounting invariant is realized safety equals engineered safety minus behavioral offset, including displacement to other failure classes.", "role_mapping": "Engineered gain -> local measure; offset/displacement -> missed net effect.", "slug": "peltzman_effect", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b012_a12_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Safety success is measured locally, while offset behavior or displaced harm may appear in another population, channel, time period, or failure mode. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Safety success is measured locally, while offset behavior or displaced harm may appear in another population, channel, time period, or failure mode."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Counterresponse Offset", "one_liner": "An intervention improves a target but changes a coupled incentive, exposure, or behavior in a way that induces a counterresponse which erodes part or all of the intended aggregate gain.", "page_ref": "prime:counterresponse_offset", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Direct gain -> local safety; induced response -> offset; displacement site -> other channel/time/population.", "slug": "counterresponse_offset", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires an intervention's direct gain to induce a coupled behavioral or exposure response that erodes aggregate benefit and must be measured separately."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Peltzman Effect", "one_liner": "When a safeguard lowers the cost of failure, an agent reallocates the freed risk-budget into riskier behavior, partly offsetting the intended gain.", "page_ref": "prime:peltzman_effect", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Engineered gain -> local measure; offset/displacement -> missed net effect.", "slug": "peltzman_effect", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's accounting invariant is realized safety equals engineered safety minus behavioral offset, including displacement to other failure classes."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A local safety measure can miss an offset response or displaced harm in another population, channel, time, or failure mode.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The behavioral offset may land back on the same agent and need not transfer downside to another bearer or hidden pool.", "slug": "peltzman_effect"}], "residual_id": "r:compensation_aware_safeguard_design:b012_a12_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b012_a12_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The protected actor receives the upside of taking more risk while some downside is transferred to others, pooled, delayed, hidden, or absorbed by the safeguard. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The protected actor receives the upside of taking more risk while some downside is transferred to others, pooled, delayed, hidden, or absorbed by the safeguard."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The behavioral offset may land back on the same agent and need not transfer downside to another bearer or hidden pool.", "slug": "peltzman_effect"}], "normalized_requirement": "The protected actor captures the upside of added risk while downside is transferred, pooled, delayed, hidden, or absorbed by the safeguard.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The protected actor captures the upside of added risk while downside is transferred, pooled, delayed, hidden, or absorbed by the safeguard.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The safeguard is advertised or socially understood in a way that may create overconfidence, invulnerability, or reduced vigilance.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The safeguard is advertised or socially understood in a way that may create overconfidence, invulnerability, or reduced vigilance. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The safeguard is advertised or socially understood in a way that may create overconfidence, invulnerability, or reduced vigilance."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The safeguard is advertised or socially understood in a way that may create overconfidence, invulnerability, or reduced vigilance."}, {"display_text": "Leadership expects technical risk reduction to translate directly into net safety without monitoring the behavioral counter-move.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Leadership expects technical risk reduction to translate directly into net safety without monitoring the behavioral counter-move. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Leadership expects technical risk reduction to translate directly into net safety without monitoring the behavioral counter-move."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "Leadership expects technical risk reduction to translate directly into net safety without monitoring the behavioral counter-move."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 12, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-012", "ledger_sha256": "f5911392d8a0dca4ced046a216a6e54f86850e84cb27e9ef93b7e8fc3e090ca6"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Competence Calibration Feedback", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:competence_calibration_feedback", "slug": "competence_calibration_feedback"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 4 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a mismatch between self-assessed competence and benchmarked performance. The mismatch can go in either direction. Overconfidence creates unsafe autonomy, poor delegation, resistance to help, or premature authority. Underconfidence creates avoidance, missed opportunity, overdependence, and hidden capacity.\n\nSeveral conditions make the mismatch persistent. Feedback may be absent or too vague. Standards may be invisible. People may receive praise or criticism without examples. Evaluators may use status or confidence as a proxy for competence. The domain may be complex enough that weak performers cannot yet see what they are missing. Context may also distort performance: lack of resources, unequal opportunity, identity threat, or poor task design can be mistaken for lack of competence unless the assessment records context.\n\nThe archetype treats competence as domain-specific. Someone can be calibrated in one task and miscalibrated in another. This is why the first step is not “assess the person”; it is “define the competence domain.”", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "An actor’s self-assessed competence diverges from actual or benchmarked performance, causing overconfidence, underconfidence, unsafe autonomy, missed learning, poor delegation, or inappropriate decision rights."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Calibration can align an instrument or model and need not involve a competence-readiness judgment.", "slug": "calibration"}], "residual_id": "r:competence_calibration_feedback:b012_a13_c1", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b012_a13_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A person, team, reviewer, trainee, leader, or expert must judge readiness, skill, authority, or support needs. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A person, team, reviewer, trainee, leader, or expert must judge readiness, skill, authority, or support needs."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Calibration can align an instrument or model and need not involve a competence-readiness judgment.", "slug": "calibration"}], "normalized_requirement": "A person or group must judge readiness, skill, authority, or support needs.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A person or group must judge readiness, skill, authority, or support needs.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P010-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include self-assessed confidence of an actor rather than an external probability alone.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An actor holds a level of confidence in their competence or ability to act.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must connect confidence to a downstream decision, behavior, or decision-right allocation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The affected role is a consequential choice or allocation concerning action, authority, delegation, risk, learning, or participation.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must make confidence influential for the outcome rather than merely measured alongside it.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The actor's confidence affects the consequential choice or allocation.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "The actor's confidence affects autonomy, delegation, risk exposure, learning choices, or participation.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An actor's confidence changes consequential choices about action, authority, risk, learning, or participation.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P010-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Reference alignment need not govern autonomy, delegation, or participation decisions.", "slug": "calibration"}], "residual_id": "r:competence_calibration_feedback:b012_a13_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b012_a13_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The actor’s confidence affects decisions, autonomy, delegation, risk exposure, learning choices, or willingness to participate. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The actor’s confidence affects decisions, autonomy, delegation, risk exposure, learning choices, or willingness to participate."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A counterexample preserving a complete impostor_syndrome instance while falsifying the selected DNF branch was attempted; the exact record makes the retained branch obligations constitutive, so none survives.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Impostor Syndrome", "one_liner": "The pattern in which a demonstrably capable, externally-validated person keeps a private conviction that their competence is fake, because a non-updating self-assessment channel rereads each new success as proof the deception still works rather than as evidence of ability.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:impostor_syndrome", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "impostor_syndrome"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "impostor_syndrome", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P010-C10-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every impostor-syndrome instance contains a persistent low felt-competence state whose fixed interpretive frame redirects consequential effort and action, satisfying the complete branch without a qualifier."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The actor's confidence affects autonomy, delegation, risk exposure, learning choices, or participation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P010-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern performance- or competence-relevant feedback rather than an unrelated message.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The affected role is feedback that should inform an actor about competence or performance.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail a present feedback defect rather than only a historical problem that has been corrected.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The branch-specific feedback defect holds at the current evaluation time.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail non-provision of the relevant feedback.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A complete branch is that the competence feedback is absent.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail specificity below what competence calibration requires.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A complete branch is that the feedback is too vague to calibrate competence against performance.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail feedback delay relative to the time at which it could guide behavior.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "A complete branch is that the feedback arrives too late for the relevant calibration or choice.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail status as a material basis or influence on feedback, without requiring status to exclude or completely displace performance evidence.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "A complete branch is that social or institutional status materially determines or biases the feedback.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail excessive punitive force in the feedback, not merely any negative evaluation.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "A complete branch is that feedback is more punitive than is compatible with useful competence calibration.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail absence of an evidential link between the feedback and measured or observed performance.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "A complete branch is that feedback is disconnected from evidence of actual performance.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Competence feedback is currently absent, vague, delayed, status-based, overly punitive, or disconnected from performance evidence.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Current competence feedback has at least one specified availability, timing, basis, or delivery defect.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P010-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A functioning calibration loop includes measured deviation, adjustment, verification, and monitoring rather than absent or evidence-disconnected feedback.", "slug": "calibration"}], "residual_id": "r:competence_calibration_feedback:b012_a13_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b012_a13_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Feedback is currently absent, vague, delayed, status-based, overly punitive, or disconnected from evidence. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Feedback is currently absent, vague, delayed, status-based, overly punitive, or disconnected from evidence."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A functioning calibration loop includes measured deviation, adjustment, verification, and monitoring rather than absent or evidence-disconnected feedback.", "slug": "calibration"}], "normalized_requirement": "Feedback is absent, vague, delayed, status-based, punitive, or disconnected from performance evidence.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Feedback is absent, vague, delayed, status-based, punitive, or disconnected from performance evidence.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "Self-assessed competence systematically diverges from benchmarked performance in a direction that changes action or autonomy.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Self-assessed competence systematically diverges from benchmarked performance in a direction that changes action or autonomy.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The domain has observable performance evidence, exemplars, standards, outcomes, or expert benchmarks.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The structural problem is a mismatch between self-assessed competence and benchmarked performance. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: The domain has observable performance evidence, exemplars, standards, outcomes, or expert benchmarks. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The domain has observable performance evidence, exemplars, standards, outcomes, or expert benchmarks.", "The structural problem is a mismatch between self-assessed competence and benchmarked performance."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "The domain has observable performance evidence, exemplars, standards, outcomes, or expert benchmarks."}, {"display_text": "The cost of miscalibrated confidence is high enough that relying on intuition alone is unsafe or wasteful.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The cost of miscalibrated confidence is high enough that relying on intuition alone is unsafe or wasteful. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The cost of miscalibrated confidence is high enough that relying on intuition alone is unsafe or wasteful."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The cost of miscalibrated confidence is high enough that relying on intuition alone is unsafe or wasteful."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 12, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-012", "ledger_sha256": "f5911392d8a0dca4ced046a216a6e54f86850e84cb27e9ef93b7e8fc3e090ca6"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Competence-Condition Activation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:competence_condition_activation", "slug": "competence_condition_activation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 1, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Bystander ambiguity and competence uncertainty reinforce each other. The more people who can see a problem, the easier it is for each person to assume another person is responsible. At the same time, the more specialized the action, the more reasonable hesitation becomes. Without an explicit competence condition, hesitation can be mistaken for prudence and overreach can be mistaken for initiative.\n\nThe structural problem is therefore not only “people fail to act.” It is that the system lacks a legitimate mapping from observed condition to qualified actor to safe action or handoff.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A needed intervention is visible to multiple actors, but no one can confidently determine whether they are the right person to act. Some observers under-act because responsibility is diffuse; others over-act because confidence, status, or urgency is mistaken for competence. The system lacks a legitimate trigger that connects observed need to verified capability."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A substrate can be temporarily receptive without requiring rescue, correction, or containment.", "slug": "readiness_window"}], "residual_id": "r:competence_condition_activation:b012_a14_c1", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b012_a14_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A situation may require action, correction, rescue, escalation, support, or containment. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A situation may require action, correction, rescue, escalation, support, or containment."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A substrate can be temporarily receptive without requiring rescue, correction, or containment.", "slug": "readiness_window"}], "normalized_requirement": "An observed situation may require correction, rescue, escalation, support, or containment.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "An observed situation may require correction, rescue, escalation, support, or containment.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P010-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require multiple observers rather than uncertainty experienced by one isolated actor.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "At least two people or roles observe the situation.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must relate the observer set to one common actionable situation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The observers have visibility of the same situation in which action may be needed.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must make observer plurality a cause of ambiguity rather than merely accompanying it.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The presence of several observers creates the social ambiguity.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail uncertainty over responsibility to act, not uncertainty about what was observed.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The ambiguity concerns which person or role should perform the needed action.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Several people or roles observe the situation, creating ambiguity about who should act.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Multiple observers of one actionable situation create ambiguity about responsibility to act.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P010-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Self-created performance obstacles do not require multiple observers or responsibility ambiguity.", "slug": "self_handicapping"}], "residual_id": "r:competence_condition_activation:b012_a14_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b012_a14_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Several people or roles can observe the situation, creating social ambiguity about who should act. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Several people or roles can observe the situation, creating social ambiguity about who should act."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Self-created performance obstacles do not require multiple observers or responsibility ambiguity.", "slug": "self_handicapping"}], "normalized_requirement": "Several people or roles observe the situation, creating ambiguity about who should act.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Several people or roles observe the situation, creating ambiguity about who should act.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P010-C13", "dnf": [], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [], "predicate": "Safe action requires domain competence, authority, recent practice, licensure, training, or context knowledge.", "resolution": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RESIDUAL", "semantic_scope": "NON_ABSTRACTION", "structural_head": "Safe-action admissibility depends on an applicable actor qualification.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P010-C13-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Tacit competence need not include authority, licensure, recent practice, or a need for action.", "slug": "implicit_knowledge"}], "residual_id": "r:competence_condition_activation:b012_a14_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b012_a14_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Action requires domain competence, authority, recent practice, licensure, training, or context knowledge. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Action requires domain competence, authority, recent practice, licensure, training, or context knowledge."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RECLASSIFIED", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 1, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Tacit competence need not include authority, licensure, recent practice, or a need for action.", "slug": "implicit_knowledge"}], "normalized_requirement": "Safe action requires domain competence, authority, recent practice, licensure, training, or context knowledge.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RECLASSIFIED", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later candidate-blind atomization classified this remainder as a threshold, parameter, materiality test, or other non-abstraction rather than a catalog gap."}, "predicate": "Safe action requires domain competence, authority, recent practice, licensure, training, or context knowledge.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A preference for harms of omission does not require an actual competence-action tradeoff.", "slug": "omission_bias"}], "residual_id": "r:competence_condition_activation:b012_a14_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b012_a14_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Unqualified action can harm, but delayed action can also harm. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Unqualified action can harm, but delayed action can also harm."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A preference for harms of omission does not require an actual competence-action tradeoff.", "slug": "omission_bias"}], "normalized_requirement": "Unqualified action can harm while delayed action can also harm.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Unqualified action can harm while delayed action can also harm.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "A legitimate trigger must join observed need to a specifically qualified actor while making inaction or handoff accountable.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A legitimate trigger must join observed need to a specifically qualified actor while making inaction or handoff accountable.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Competence can be specified and at least partly verified before or during the event.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: Competence can be specified and at least partly verified before or during the event. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Competence can be specified and at least partly verified before or during the event."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Competence can be specified and at least partly verified before or during the event."}, {"display_text": "There is a feasible handoff path when the observing actor lacks sufficient competence.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The structural problem is therefore not only “people fail to act.” It is that the system lacks a legitimate mapping from observed condition to qualified actor to safe action or handoff. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: There is a feasible handoff path when the observing actor lacks sufficient competence. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["There is a feasible handoff path when the observing actor lacks sufficient competence.", "The structural problem is therefore not only “people fail to act.” It is that the system lacks a legitimate mapping from observed condition to qualified actor to safe action or handoff."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "There is a feasible handoff path when the observing actor lacks sufficient competence."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 12, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-012", "ledger_sha256": "f5911392d8a0dca4ced046a216a6e54f86850e84cb27e9ef93b7e8fc3e090ca6"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Complement Space Mapping", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:complement_space_mapping", "slug": "complement_space_mapping"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A focal set is defined, but the cases outside it are left implicit, conflated with unknowns or opposites, or treated as irrelevant even though the excluded remainder affects inference, duty, risk, design, or governance.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A focal set is defined, but the cases outside it are left implicit, conflated with unknowns or opposites, or treated as irrelevant even though the excluded remainder affects inference, duty, risk, design, or governance."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a declared universe, a designated subset, and the residual consisting of everything in the universe outside that subset.", "role_mapping": "Designated subset -> focal group; residual operator -> outside group.", "slug": "complement", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b012_a15_c1a", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A rule, eligibility criterion, class, inventory, or data filter creates an outside group whose members still matter. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A rule, eligibility criterion, class, inventory, or data filter creates an outside group whose members still matter."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Complement", "one_liner": "Everything in a declared universe that is not in a designated subset.", "page_ref": "prime:complement", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Designated subset -> focal group; residual operator -> outside group.", "slug": "complement", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a declared universe, a designated subset, and the residual consisting of everything in the universe outside that subset."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A declared rule or criterion designates a focal subset and thereby creates an outside remainder.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid complement requires an explicit universe and therefore does not entail a hidden one.", "slug": "complement"}], "residual_id": "r:complement_space_mapping:b012_a15_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b012_a15_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The universe of discourse is unclear, so complement claims change depending on hidden scope assumptions. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The universe of discourse is unclear, so complement claims change depending on hidden scope assumptions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid complement requires an explicit universe and therefore does not entail a hidden one.", "slug": "complement"}], "normalized_requirement": "The universe of discourse is unclear, so the complement changes with hidden scope assumptions.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The universe of discourse is unclear, so the complement changes with hidden scope assumptions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Complement means outside the subset relative to a universe, not semantic opposition; correct complement reasoning forbids this inference.", "slug": "complement"}], "residual_id": "r:complement_space_mapping:b012_a15_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b012_a15_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A system treats nonmembership as evidence of the opposite property, even though it may only mean outside the focal subset. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A system treats nonmembership as evidence of the opposite property, even though it may only mean outside the focal subset."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Complement means outside the subset relative to a universe, not semantic opposition; correct complement reasoning forbids this inference.", "slug": "complement"}], "normalized_requirement": "A system treats nonmembership in the focal subset as evidence of the opposite property.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A system treats nonmembership in the focal subset as evidence of the opposite property.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P010-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern marginal or ambiguous classification cases rather than ordinary category members.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The affected role is a case at or near a classification boundary.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail routing of the case into an outside-or-remainder category.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The boundary case is assigned to the remainder or complement class.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require unexamined default assignment, not an openly reasoned remainder decision.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The remainder assignment occurs silently or by default rather than through explicit case-specific judgment.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail absence of review before or during remainder assignment.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The boundary case does not receive the review that would otherwise examine its fit.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Boundary cases are silently assigned to the remainder rather than reviewed.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Classification boundary cases default into the remainder without explicit review.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P010-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Examining cases that challenge a rule is a remedy and need not follow silent remainder assignment.", "slug": "negative_case_analysis"}], "residual_id": "r:complement_space_mapping:b012_a15_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b012_a15_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Boundary cases are being silently assigned to the remainder instead of reviewed. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Boundary cases are being silently assigned to the remainder instead of reviewed."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Examining cases that challenge a rule is a remedy and need not follow silent remainder assignment.", "slug": "negative_case_analysis"}], "normalized_requirement": "Boundary cases are silently assigned to the remainder rather than reviewed.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Boundary cases are silently assigned to the remainder rather than reviewed.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime defines the remainder as exactly universe minus subset, making the two sides disjoint and exhaustive.", "role_mapping": "Universe -> relevant whole; subset -> included cases; complement -> excluded cases.", "slug": "complement", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b012_a15_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Analysts need to prove that included plus excluded cases exhaust the relevant universe without overlap. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Analysts need to prove that included plus excluded cases exhaust the relevant universe without overlap."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Complement", "one_liner": "Everything in a declared universe that is not in a designated subset.", "page_ref": "prime:complement", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Universe -> relevant whole; subset -> included cases; complement -> excluded cases.", "slug": "complement", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime defines the remainder as exactly universe minus subset, making the two sides disjoint and exhaustive."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Included and excluded sets must be disjoint and jointly exhaustive over the declared universe.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "An exclusion, residual population, unserved option, noncovered risk, or not-yet-classified case needs explicit tracking.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: An exclusion, residual population, unserved option, noncovered risk, or not-yet-classified case needs explicit tracking. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["An exclusion, residual population, unserved option, noncovered risk, or not-yet-classified case needs explicit tracking."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "An exclusion, residual population, unserved option, noncovered risk, or not-yet-classified case needs explicit tracking."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 12, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-012", "ledger_sha256": "f5911392d8a0dca4ced046a216a6e54f86850e84cb27e9ef93b7e8fc3e090ca6"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Completeness Audit", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:completeness_audit", "slug": "completeness_audit"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 1, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a mismatch between assumed coverage and actual coverage. A policy may assume all relevant applicants are represented, a test suite may assume all important user paths are tested, a dataset may assume all needed populations are observed, or a risk register may assume all significant hazards are listed.\n\nThese failures often appear as surprises: “we did not think of that case,” “there is no owner for this path,” “that population was not in the model,” “the default rule does not fit,” or “the matrix has no row for this requirement.” The deeper issue is that the coverage space was never made explicit enough to compare against reality.\n\nCompleteness Audit addresses this by defining the relevant set, partitioning it into auditable units, mapping actual coverage, finding gaps, and assigning each gap a disposition.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A model, policy, process, dataset, taxonomy, design, test suite, or governance structure fails because relevant cases, states, paths, stakeholders, requirements, records, or risks are missing, implicit, weakly represented, or treated as if they were outside the problem without justification."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete structure can exist without an actor making a coverage claim, and a claim can be false.", "slug": "completeness"}], "residual_id": "r:completeness_audit:b013_a01_c1", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b013_a01_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The system claims to cover a domain, population, lifecycle, state space, risk space, or requirement set. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The system claims to cover a domain, population, lifecycle, state space, risk space, or requirement set."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete structure can exist without an actor making a coverage claim, and a claim can be false.", "slug": "completeness"}], "normalized_requirement": "A system claims coverage of a domain, population, lifecycle, state space, risk space, or requirement set.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A system claims coverage of a domain, population, lifecycle, state space, risk space, or requirement set.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P010-C15", "dnf": [], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [], "predicate": "Failures appear in edge cases, transitions, omitted stakeholders, missing records, exceptions, or rare scenarios.", "resolution": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RESIDUAL", "semantic_scope": "NON_ABSTRACTION", "structural_head": "Observed failures occur in specified marginal or omitted scenarios.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P010-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A schema can silently omit a consequential case before any failure appears.", "slug": "schema_bounded_blind_spot"}], "residual_id": "r:completeness_audit:b013_a01_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b013_a01_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Failures are appearing in edge cases, exceptions, transitions, omitted stakeholders, missing records, or rare scenarios. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Failures are appearing in edge cases, exceptions, transitions, omitted stakeholders, missing records, or rare scenarios."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RECLASSIFIED", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 1, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A schema can silently omit a consequential case before any failure appears.", "slug": "schema_bounded_blind_spot"}], "normalized_requirement": "Failures appear in edge cases, transitions, omitted stakeholders, missing records, exceptions, or rare scenarios.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RECLASSIFIED", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later candidate-blind atomization classified this remainder as a threshold, parameter, materiality test, or other non-abstraction rather than a catalog gap."}, "predicate": "Failures appear in edge cases, transitions, omitted stakeholders, missing records, exceptions, or rare scenarios.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "At least one consequential case lies inside the intended coverage universe but outside the representational or procedural path that is treated as exhaustive.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "At least one consequential case lies inside the intended coverage universe but outside the representational or procedural path that is treated as exhaustive.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Actors rely on a checklist, matrix, test suite, policy, taxonomy, or dataset as evidence of coverage.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when people are relying on a coverage artifact such as a checklist, policy table, risk register, test suite, data schema, requirements matrix, or stakeholder map. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Actors rely on a checklist, matrix, test suite, policy, taxonomy, or dataset as evidence of coverage. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Actors rely on a checklist, matrix, test suite, policy, taxonomy, or dataset as evidence of coverage.", "It is especially useful when people are relying on a coverage artifact such as a checklist, policy table, risk register, test suite, data schema, requirements matrix, or stakeholder map."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Actors rely on a checklist, matrix, test suite, policy, taxonomy, or dataset as evidence of coverage."}, {"display_text": "A system is entering a new context, population, scale, legal regime, market, or operating environment.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This archetype is also valuable after a system expands into a new population, legal environment, scale, domain, product line, or operating mode. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: A system is entering a new context, population, scale, legal regime, market, or operating environment. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A system is entering a new context, population, scale, legal regime, market, or operating environment.", "This archetype is also valuable after a system expands into a new population, legal environment, scale, domain, product line, or operating mode."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "A system is entering a new context, population, scale, legal regime, market, or operating environment."}, {"display_text": "The cost of omissions is high, such as safety, rights, eligibility, financial, scientific, or public-trust consequences.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The cost of omissions is high, such as safety, rights, eligibility, financial, scientific, or public-trust consequences. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The cost of omissions is high, such as safety, rights, eligibility, financial, scientific, or public-trust consequences."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The cost of omissions is high, such as safety, rights, eligibility, financial, scientific, or public-trust consequences."}, {"display_text": "Different groups disagree about whether an omission is outside scope, an edge case, or a defect.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Common triggers include edge-case failures, missing records, unhandled exceptions, excluded stakeholders, orphaned requirements, untested behavior, undocumented risks, and ambiguous scope boundaries. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Different groups disagree about whether an omission is outside scope, an edge case, or a defect. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Different groups disagree about whether an omission is outside scope, an edge case, or a defect.", "Common triggers include edge-case failures, missing records, unhandled exceptions, excluded stakeholders, orphaned requirements, untested behavior, undocumented risks, and ambiguous scope boundaries."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Different groups disagree about whether an omission is outside scope, an edge case, or a defect."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 13, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-013", "ledger_sha256": "5e56b18bf80bce86f74750f754385e0ffb65f7a0b0abe36f7f3a510db93d77e9"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Complexity Budgeting", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:complexity_budgeting", "slug": "complexity_budgeting"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 2, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is unmanaged accretion. A team begins with a workable core model, process, design, or rule. Then each stakeholder adds a small refinement: another feature, another caveat, another parameter, another approval, another dashboard, another exception. Each addition can be defended locally. But the total structure becomes harder to understand, harder to validate, harder to maintain, and easier to misuse.\n\nThis is not merely “too much complexity” in the abstract. Some complexity is valuable and necessary. The failure is that complexity is not being charged to any scarce resource. When there is no budget, the system accepts additions until the hidden costs show up as confusion, fragility, support burden, or false sophistication.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A model, design, process, policy, or system accumulates complexity faster than its added value, becoming harder to understand, validate, maintain, govern, or adapt."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P011-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must apply to iterative refinement rather than to an unrelated unbounded activity.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The affected activity is an ongoing refinement process.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require the absence of an explicit effective bound, not merely permit a large budget.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "No declared stopping criterion, complexity budget, or comparable effective bound constrains the refinement.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must connect absence of the bound to open-ended continuation of refinement.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The missing bound leaves the refinement open-ended.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "A refinement process remains open-ended because no declared stopping criterion or complexity budget bounds it.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "refinement remains open-ended without a declared bound", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P011-C01-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Iterative improvement can have a clear termination criterion and complexity budget.", "slug": "refinement"}], "residual_id": "r:complexity_budgeting:b013_a02_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b013_a02_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Refinement is open-ended. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Refinement is open-ended"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A one-time principled methodology update would not qualify as moving the goalposts and would not entail open-ended refinement; the exact record excludes it by requiring repeated evidence-blocking revision.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Moving the goalposts", "one_liner": "An argumentative pattern in which, on being shown evidence that meets a previously stipulated standard, one party revises the standard upward to block the conclusion rather than accept it — repeated so that no finite evidence can settle the question.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:moving_the_goalposts", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "moving_the_goalposts"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "moving_the_goalposts", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P011-C01-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record necessarily supplies repeated refinement, absence of an effective terminal standard, and resulting open-ended continuation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Refinement is open-ended without a declared stopping or complexity budget.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P011-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must identify the locus that creates the added complexity.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A feature, rule, exception, owner, or comparable identifiable locus creates an increment of complexity.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern complexity cost rather than an unrelated financial or operational charge.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The affected object is the cost imposed by that added complexity.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail absent attribution or charge-back to the identical complexity-creating locus.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The added complexity cost is not charged to the same locus that created it.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Added complexity cost created by a feature, rule, exception, owner, or comparable identifiable locus is not charged to that same creating locus.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "added complexity cost is not charged to its creating locus", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P011-C02-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An irreducible complexity floor can be allocated explicitly and need not be uncharged or ownerless.", "slug": "law_of_conservation_of_complexity"}], "residual_id": "r:complexity_budgeting:b013_a02_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b013_a02_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Complexity costs are not charged. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Complexity costs are not charged"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Holding the exact DSA and mapped roles fixed, no complete instance can falsify the satisfied DNF branch without contradicting the exact signature.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Feature Creep", "one_liner": "Explain why a product accretes capabilities past net benefit as a governance failure, not a quality one — an approval gate that judges each addition in isolation against its stated cost while structurally blind to the compounding global cost of all additions together.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:feature_creep", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "feature_creep"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "feature_creep", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P011-C02-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record entails a complete DNF branch under a subtype-preserving mapping; no qualifier or solution-operation substitution is needed."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Holding the exact DSA and mapped roles fixed, no complete instance can falsify the satisfied DNF branch once the one atomic qualifier is fixed.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Golden Hammer Anti-Pattern", "one_liner": "Diagnose a team applying its familiar technology to a poorly-fitting problem because the acquisition cost of an alternative is visible while the misfit cost is diffuse and downstream, so fluency reshapes what counts as the right tool before fit is ever asked.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:golden_hammer_anti_pattern", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1", "O2"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "misfit_cost_is_added_complexity", "predicate": "the downstream misfit cost consists of added complexity", "rationale": "The retained expression passes universal-necessity, qualifier-laundering, and bridge-generality review."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "golden_hammer_anti_pattern"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "the downstream misfit cost consists of added complexity"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "golden_hammer_anti_pattern", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P011-C02-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record entails a complete DNF branch under a subtype-preserving mapping; the one atomic context qualifier fills exactly the guardable gaps and passes laundering checks."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Authorized quality investment with its downstream burden budgeted would falsify the atom and is explicitly excluded from gold plating.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Gold Plating", "one_liner": "Diagnose a delivery overrun as producer-side unilateral scope expansion — quality or features added beyond the authorized envelope without the principal's sanction — whose real cost lives not in the polish but in the unbudgeted second-order burden it drags into downstream processes.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:gold_plating", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "gold_plating"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "gold_plating", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P011-C02-U1", "why_it_fits": "Producer creation, downstream complexity cost, and non-allocation of that cost to the addition are all load-bearing exact-record commitments."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Added complexity costs are not charged to the feature, rule, exception, or owner that creates them.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The distinction identifies removable versus irreducible complexity but does not require the accidental portion to obscure the core.", "slug": "accidental_vs_essential_complexity"}], "residual_id": "r:complexity_budgeting:b013_a02_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b013_a02_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The core model or experience is being obscured. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The core model or experience is being obscured"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The distinction identifies removable versus irreducible complexity but does not require the accidental portion to obscure the core.", "slug": "accidental_vs_essential_complexity"}], "normalized_requirement": "Accumulated approach complexity obscures the core model, task, or user experience.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Accumulated approach complexity obscures the core model, task, or user experience.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Finite selection bandwidth does not by itself define system validation or maintenance capacity.", "slug": "attentional_capacity"}], "residual_id": "r:complexity_budgeting:b013_a02_c5", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b013_a02_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Validation capacity is finite. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Validation capacity is finite"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Finite selection bandwidth does not by itself define system validation or maintenance capacity.", "slug": "attentional_capacity"}], "normalized_requirement": "The capacity to understand, maintain, and validate the system is finite.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The capacity to understand, maintain, and validate the system is finite.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Local additions look reasonable.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Local additions look reasonable. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Local additions look reasonable"]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "Local additions look reasonable"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 13, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-013", "ledger_sha256": "5e56b18bf80bce86f74750f754385e0ffb65f7a0b0abe36f7f3a510db93d77e9"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Complexity Scaling Assessment", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:complexity_scaling_assessment", "slug": "complexity_scaling_assessment"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 4 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is small-scale evidence being mistaken for full-scale feasibility. The current context is forgiving: there are few cases, people can coordinate informally, data fits in memory, experts can review exceptions, or a pilot team can absorb rework. As scale increases, hidden costs appear. Work queues form, review capacity saturates, pairwise interactions multiply, memory or runtime rises, communication overhead grows, and exception handling can dominate the normal path.\n\nThe dangerous feature is that the failure often appears late. By the time scale failure is visible, the organization may already have committed to rollout, staffing, architecture, policy, or public promises.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A solution appears feasible at current size, but its resource demands may grow too quickly with more data, users, cases, participants, dependencies, locations, variants, or interactions."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a proven intervention moving from a curated niche into a heterogeneous uncurated scaled distribution.", "role_mapping": "Curated pilot -> one listed small setting; scaled distribution -> larger operating context.", "slug": "pilot_to_scale_transition", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b013_a03_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A process, system, or algorithm is being expanded from pilot, prototype, small team, small dataset, or low demand into a larger operating context. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A process, system, or algorithm is being expanded from pilot, prototype, small team, small dataset, or low demand into a larger operating context."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Pilot To Scale Transition", "one_liner": "An effect proven in a curated niche need not survive the heterogeneous distribution of scale.", "page_ref": "prime:pilot_to_scale_transition", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Curated pilot -> one listed small setting; scaled distribution -> larger operating context.", "slug": "pilot_to_scale_transition", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a proven intervention moving from a curated niche into a heterogeneous uncurated scaled distribution."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A process, system, or algorithm is expanding from a pilot, prototype, small team, small dataset, or low-demand setting into a larger operating context.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Scalability is a response property under growth and does not require a forecast that load will grow.", "slug": "scalability"}], "residual_id": "r:complexity_scaling_assessment:b013_a03_c2", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b013_a03_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The number of cases, users, records, interfaces, approvals, dependencies, variants, or interactions is expected to grow materially. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The number of cases, users, records, interfaces, approvals, dependencies, variants, or interactions is expected to grow materially."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Scalability is a response property under growth and does not require a forecast that load will grow.", "slug": "scalability"}], "normalized_requirement": "Cases, users, records, interfaces, approvals, dependencies, variants, or interactions will grow materially.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Cases, users, records, interfaces, approvals, dependencies, variants, or interactions will grow materially.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P011-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include a presently manageable manual procedure as the dependent capability.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A procedure is currently manageable through manual work.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail a prerequisite relation, not merely co-occurrence with human involvement.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The procedure's current manual manageability depends on a human cognitive or coordination support.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only if attention is necessary to current manual manageability.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A complete branch is that current manual manageability depends on attention.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only if memory is necessary to current manual manageability.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A complete branch is that current manual manageability depends on memory.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only if informal coordination is necessary to current manual manageability.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "A complete branch is that current manual manageability depends on informal coordination.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only if expert triage is necessary to current manual manageability.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "A complete branch is that current manual manageability depends on expert triage.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A procedure is currently manageable by manual means only because it depends on attention, memory, informal coordination, or expert triage.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "current manual manageability depends on informal human cognitive or coordination capacity", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P011-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Finite oversight can be formalized and need not involve a currently manageable manual process.", "slug": "oversight_capacity"}], "residual_id": "r:complexity_scaling_assessment:b013_a03_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b013_a03_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A current procedure is manually manageable but depends on attention, memory, informal coordination, or expert triage. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A current procedure is manually manageable but depends on attention, memory, informal coordination, or expert triage."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Finite oversight can be formalized and need not involve a currently manageable manual process.", "slug": "oversight_capacity"}], "normalized_requirement": "Current manual manageability depends on attention, memory, informal coordination, or expert triage.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Current manual manageability depends on attention, memory, informal coordination, or expert triage.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P011-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must apply to a scalability claim about a system, not merely to system growth.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A team or comparable claimant asserts that a system is scalable.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail an omission in the claim rather than an unknown value outside it.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "At least one required scaling parameter is not identified in the claim.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only if the varying load or size driver is absent.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A complete branch is that the claim omits the scale driver.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only if the resources whose demand changes are absent.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A complete branch is that the claim omits the resource dimensions.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only if the scale at which behavior degrades or changes is absent.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "A complete branch is that the claim omits the breakpoint.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A claim that a system is scalable omits at least one of its scale driver, resource dimensions, or breakpoint.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "a scalability claim omits a required scaling parameter", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P011-C04-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A system can have measured scaling behavior with all drivers and breakpoints declared.", "slug": "scalability"}], "residual_id": "r:complexity_scaling_assessment:b013_a03_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b013_a03_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A domain team claims that a system is “scalable” without identifying the scale driver, resource dimensions, and breakpoint. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A domain team claims that a system is “scalable” without identifying the scale driver, resource dimensions, and breakpoint."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A system can have measured scaling behavior with all drivers and breakpoints declared.", "slug": "scalability"}], "normalized_requirement": "A scalability claim omits its scale driver, resource dimensions, or breakpoint.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A scalability claim omits its scale driver, resource dimensions, or breakpoint.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A design choice must be made between alternatives with different scaling behavior.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is also useful when different options have different scaling behavior. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: A design choice must be made between alternatives with different scaling behavior. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A design choice must be made between alternatives with different scaling behavior.", "It is also useful when different options have different scaling behavior."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "A design choice must be made between alternatives with different scaling behavior."}, {"display_text": "Past failures involved backlog, latency, budget overrun, coordination breakdown, runaway review load, or performance cliffs after growth.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A heavier indexing or automation option may look excessive early but become necessary once search, review, or coordination costs grow. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Past failures involved backlog, latency, budget overrun, coordination breakdown, runaway review load, or performance cliffs after growth. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Past failures involved backlog, latency, budget overrun, coordination breakdown, runaway review load, or performance cliffs after growth.", "A heavier indexing or automation option may look excessive early but become necessary once search, review, or coordination costs grow."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Past failures involved backlog, latency, budget overrun, coordination breakdown, runaway review load, or performance cliffs after growth."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 13, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-013", "ledger_sha256": "5e56b18bf80bce86f74750f754385e0ffb65f7a0b0abe36f7f3a510db93d77e9"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Composability Testing and Validation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:composability_testing_and_validation", "slug": "composability_testing_and_validation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Compositional systems depend on the assumption that parts can be recombined. That assumption is often too strong. Isolated component tests cannot reveal all combined behavior because interaction effects live in the relationship among parts, contexts, timing, and constraints. The result is late-stage integration surprise, post-release failure, hidden harm, or false confidence.\n\nThe root tension is that compositionality creates leverage by allowing reuse, but reuse multiplies the number of possible combinations. The more freely components can be recombined, the more carefully the system must preserve evidence about where recombination has actually been validated.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Individually valid components are being combined under an implicit assumption of compatibility, but the combined behavior may contain interaction effects, emergent failures, latent incompatibilities, or context-dependent breakdowns that isolated evaluation cannot reveal."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Two artifacts can be compatible without belonging to a modular assembled system.", "slug": "compatibility"}], "residual_id": "r:composability_testing_and_validation:b013_a04_c1", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b013_a04_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The system is modular, compositional, package-based, or assembled from independently designed elements. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The system is modular, compositional, package-based, or assembled from independently designed elements."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Two artifacts can be compatible without belonging to a modular assembled system.", "slug": "compatibility"}], "normalized_requirement": "The system is assembled from modular, compositional, package-based, or independently designed elements.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The system is assembled from modular, compositional, package-based, or independently designed elements.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Replaceability under a role contract does not require recombination, scaling, or context reuse.", "slug": "substitutability"}], "residual_id": "r:composability_testing_and_validation:b013_a04_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b013_a04_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It fits when components will be substituted, recombined, versioned, reused, or scaled; when the cost of a bad combination is high; when exhaustive testing is impossible; and when the team needs a defensible boundary between supported, unsupported, experimental, and prohibited combinations. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Components are expected to be substituted, recombined, versioned, scaled, or reused across contexts.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Components are expected to be substituted, recombined, versioned, scaled, or reused across contexts.", "It fits when components will be substituted, recombined, versioned, reused, or scaled; when the cost of a bad combination is high; when exhaustive testing is impossible; and when the team needs a defensible boundary between supported, unsupported, experimental, and prohibited combinations."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Replaceability under a role contract does not require recombination, scaling, or context reuse.", "slug": "substitutability"}], "normalized_requirement": "Components are expected to be substituted, recombined, versioned, scaled, or reused across contexts.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Components are expected to be substituted, recombined, versioned, scaled, or reused across contexts.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires two locally workable systems whose offered and required contracts differ at a load-bearing exchange seam.", "role_mapping": "Components -> locally workable sides; differing contract -> non-empty interface gap.", "slug": "interface_mismatch", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b013_a04_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Interface contracts, side effects, resource requirements, assumptions, or operating regimes differ across components. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Interface contracts, side effects, resource requirements, assumptions, or operating regimes differ across components."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Interface Mismatch", "one_liner": "Two systems that are locally workable fail to compose because what one exposes at their required exchange boundary does not satisfy what the other can accept, including the limiting case where the needed handoff surface is absent.", "page_ref": "prime:interface_mismatch", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Components -> locally workable sides; differing contract -> non-empty interface gap.", "slug": "interface_mismatch", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires two locally workable systems whose offered and required contracts differ at a load-bearing exchange seam."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Component interface contracts, side effects, resource needs, assumptions, or operating regimes differ at a required seam.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires localized joint failure at a required seam while neither component interior is defective.", "role_mapping": "Isolated validity -> locally workable sides; interaction failure -> seam mismatch.", "slug": "interface_mismatch", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b013_a04_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Failures are likely to arise from interactions rather than from any one component in isolation. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Failures are likely to arise from interactions rather than from any one component in isolation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Interface Mismatch", "one_liner": "Two systems that are locally workable fail to compose because what one exposes at their required exchange boundary does not satisfy what the other can accept, including the limiting case where the needed handoff surface is absent.", "page_ref": "prime:interface_mismatch", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Isolated validity -> locally workable sides; interaction failure -> seam mismatch.", "slug": "interface_mismatch", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires localized joint failure at a required seam while neither component interior is defective."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "End-to-end failure arises at the interaction seam even though each component can work in isolation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A finite but large test matrix is a resource problem, not necessarily a decidability boundary.", "slug": "decidability_computability"}], "residual_id": "r:composability_testing_and_validation:b013_a04_c6", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b013_a04_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: There are too many possible combinations for exhaustive testing, forcing deliberate coverage choices. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["There are too many possible combinations for exhaustive testing, forcing deliberate coverage choices."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A finite but large test matrix is a resource problem, not necessarily a decidability boundary.", "slug": "decidability_computability"}], "normalized_requirement": "The number of possible component combinations is too large for exhaustive testing.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The number of possible component combinations is too large for exhaustive testing.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a higher-level property generated by lower-level local interactions and absent from any constituent alone.", "role_mapping": "Constituents -> components; local rules -> interactions; novel macro property -> emergent behavior.", "slug": "emergence", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b013_a04_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The system exhibits emergent behavior, delayed effects, nonlinear interactions, or subgroup/context sensitivity. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The system exhibits emergent behavior, delayed effects, nonlinear interactions, or subgroup/context sensitivity."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Emergence", "one_liner": "Complex patterns from simple rules.", "page_ref": "prime:emergence", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Constituents -> components; local rules -> interactions; novel macro property -> emergent behavior.", "slug": "emergence", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a higher-level property generated by lower-level local interactions and absent from any constituent alone."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The system exhibits emergent behavior, delayed effects, nonlinear interactions, or subgroup or context sensitivity.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The cost of a bad combination is high enough that informal trial-and-error is unacceptable.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It fits when components will be substituted, recombined, versioned, reused, or scaled; when the cost of a bad combination is high; when exhaustive testing is impossible; and when the team needs a defensible boundary between supported, unsupported, experimental, and prohibited combinations. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The cost of a bad combination is high enough that informal trial-and-error is unacceptable. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The cost of a bad combination is high enough that informal trial-and-error is unacceptable.", "It fits when components will be substituted, recombined, versioned, reused, or scaled; when the cost of a bad combination is high; when exhaustive testing is impossible; and when the team needs a defensible boundary between supported, unsupported, experimental, and prohibited combinations."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The cost of a bad combination is high enough that informal trial-and-error is unacceptable."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 13, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-013", "ledger_sha256": "5e56b18bf80bce86f74750f754385e0ffb65f7a0b0abe36f7f3a510db93d77e9"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Composable Relation Modeling", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:composable_relation_modeling", "slug": "composable_relation_modeling"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system is described mainly by the intrinsic properties of objects, categories, modules, or entities, while the operationally decisive structure lies in the allowed mappings among them and in how those mappings compose.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system is described mainly by the intrinsic properties of objects, categories, modules, or entities, while the operationally decisive structure lies in the allowed mappings among them and in how those mappings compose."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A relation between objects need not hold object descriptions fixed across different transformation sets.", "slug": "relation"}], "residual_id": "r:composable_relation_modeling:b013_a05_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b013_a05_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The same object-level description supports different behavior depending on which transformations, handoffs, conversions, or dependencies are allowed. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The same object-level description supports different behavior depending on which transformations, handoffs, conversions, or dependencies are allowed."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A relation between objects need not hold object descriptions fixed across different transformation sets.", "slug": "relation"}], "normalized_requirement": "Identical object descriptions support different behavior depending on allowed transformations, handoffs, conversions, or dependencies.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Identical object descriptions support different behavior depending on allowed transformations, handoffs, conversions, or dependencies.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P011-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must compare a multi-step relational path with a distinct second path, without requiring the second path also to be multi-step.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "One path in a two-path comparison is a multi-step relational path; the other is a distinct comparison path.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must make the comparison decision-relevant rather than merely descriptive.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A decision depends on the result of the path comparison.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only by requiring an equivalence comparison between paths.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A complete branch compares whether the two paths are equivalent.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only by requiring the specified relative-safety comparison between paths.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A complete branch compares whether the multi-step path is safer than the other path.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only by requiring the specified substitutability comparison between paths.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "A complete branch compares whether the multi-step path can substitute for the other path.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A decision depends on whether one multi-step relational path is equivalent to, safer than, or substitutable for another path.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "a decision depends on comparing one multi-step relational path with another path", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P011-C05-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A semantics-preserving rewrite need not compare multi-step operational paths or safety.", "slug": "equivalence_preserving_rewriting"}], "residual_id": "r:composable_relation_modeling:b013_a05_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b013_a05_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A decision depends on whether a multi-step path is equivalent to, safer than, or substitutable for another path. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A decision depends on whether a multi-step path is equivalent to, safer than, or substitutable for another path."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A semantics-preserving rewrite need not compare multi-step operational paths or safety.", "slug": "equivalence_preserving_rewriting"}], "normalized_requirement": "A decision compares whether one multi-step relational path is equivalent to, safer than, or substitutable for another.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A decision compares whether one multi-step relational path is equivalent to, safer than, or substitutable for another.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a directed cross-domain mapping that preserves higher-order relational structure while discarding surface attributes.", "role_mapping": "Source/target domains -> materially different domains; preserved roles -> transferable structure.", "slug": "analogy", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b013_a05_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A pattern seems transferable across domains even though the objects in each domain are materially different. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A pattern seems transferable across domains even though the objects in each domain are materially different."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Analogy", "one_liner": "Transfer structure between domains.", "page_ref": "prime:analogy", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source/target domains -> materially different domains; preserved roles -> transferable structure.", "slug": "analogy", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a directed cross-domain mapping that preserves higher-order relational structure while discarding surface attributes."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Relational structure is transferred across domains whose objects differ materially.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P011-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must apply to an artifact or process in which elements or mappings are composed.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A workflow, schema, proof, API, transformation, or comparable artifact relies on a composition.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require absence of a declaration or contract governing valid composition.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The validity conditions for the composition are not explicitly declared.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail assumed validity, not merely an unknown or untested composition.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The artifact or process proceeds as though the composition were valid.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must make the undeclared validity assumption causally responsible for failure.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The substitution of assumption for declaration causes the artifact or process to fail.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "A compositional artifact or process fails because the validity of a composition was assumed rather than explicitly declared.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "composition fails because validity was assumed rather than declared", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P011-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid composition rule computes whole meaning predictably and does not entail an undeclared invalid composition.", "slug": "compositionality"}], "residual_id": "r:composable_relation_modeling:b013_a05_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b013_a05_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Interface contracts, workflows, schemas, proofs, APIs, or transformations fail because valid composition was assumed rather than declared. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Interface contracts, workflows, schemas, proofs, APIs, or transformations fail because valid composition was assumed rather than declared."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_SYNTHESIS", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "With the preservation rule fixed as undeclared, a warranted successful part-to-whole composition would contradict the exact record's defining unlicensed inference; an explicitly declared inadequate rule is excluded by the guard.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Fallacy of Composition", "one_liner": "Infer that a predicate established for one or all parts must hold of the whole they form, without a warranted preservation rule across aggregation, interaction, scale, configuration, or shared constraints.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:fallacy_of_composition", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "part_to_whole_preservation_rule_is_undeclared", "predicate": "part_to_whole_preservation_rule IS undeclared", "rationale": "The retained expression passes universal-necessity, qualifier-laundering, and bridge-generality review."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "fallacy_of_composition"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "part_to_whole_preservation_rule_is_undeclared"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "fallacy_of_composition", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P011-C06-U1", "why_it_fits": "The two raw guards each isolated a real gap but misclassified its role. One context binding on the existing preservation-rule declaration status closes O2; invalid assumed composition already supplies the remaining failure relation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A workflow, schema, proof, API, or transformation fails because valid composition was assumed rather than declared.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P011-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require accumulating or multiplying taxonomic structure, not a single stable taxonomy.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Object taxonomies or comparable classifications are proliferating.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include elements whose allowed composition is an operational question.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The modeled domain contains objects, mappings, or comparable elements for which composition matters.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail omission of composability rules from the growing classification structure.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The proliferating taxonomies do not specify which modeled elements can compose with which others.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Object taxonomies proliferate while failing to specify which modeled objects or mappings can compose.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "proliferating taxonomies omit practical composability relations", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P011-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A formal account of entities and relations need not proliferate or omit composition constraints.", "slug": "ontology"}], "residual_id": "r:composable_relation_modeling:b013_a05_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b013_a05_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Object taxonomies are proliferating but do not answer the practical question: what can compose with what? The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Object taxonomies are proliferating but do not answer the practical question: what can compose with what?"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A formal account of entities and relations need not proliferate or omit composition constraints.", "slug": "ontology"}], "normalized_requirement": "Object taxonomies proliferate without answering which objects or mappings can compose.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Object taxonomies proliferate without answering which objects or mappings can compose.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Local modules work, but system-level reasoning requires knowing which chains of relations are valid and invariant-preserving.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: Local modules work, but system-level reasoning requires knowing which chains of relations are valid and invariant-preserving. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Local modules work, but system-level reasoning requires knowing which chains of relations are valid and invariant-preserving."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Local modules work, but system-level reasoning requires knowing which chains of relations are valid and invariant-preserving."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 13, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-013", "ledger_sha256": "5e56b18bf80bce86f74750f754385e0ffb65f7a0b0abe36f7f3a510db93d77e9"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Compositional Assembly", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:compositional_assembly", "slug": "compositional_assembly"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is fragmentation without coherent integration. Parts exist, but their roles, boundaries, dependencies, interfaces, order, or compatibility are not explicit enough to produce the desired whole. The result may look organized on paper while failing in use: handoffs break, responsibilities collide, duplicate functions consume capacity, needed roles are missing, or local improvements create system-wide disruption.\n\nA useful diagnostic is to ask whether the failure appears inside a component or between components. If the parts are individually acceptable but the combined system fails, the problem is likely compositional.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Available parts, modules, actors, ideas, policies, procedures, or materials exist, but they do not yet form a coherent functioning whole because their roles, relations, interfaces, order, or compatibility have not been deliberately designed."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Non-additive interaction can be strongly beneficial and does not require incoherent assembly.", "slug": "synergy_and_antagonism"}], "residual_id": "r:compositional_assembly:b013_a06_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b013_a06_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Useful components exist but their combined effect is weak, incoherent, duplicative, or self-defeating. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Useful components exist but their combined effect is weak, incoherent, duplicative, or self-defeating."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Non-additive interaction can be strongly beneficial and does not require incoherent assembly.", "slug": "synergy_and_antagonism"}], "normalized_requirement": "Useful components have a weak, incoherent, duplicative, or self-defeating combined effect.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Useful components have a weak, incoherent, duplicative, or self-defeating combined effect.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires tasks linked through pooled, sequential, reciprocal, or team dependencies over shared outputs or resources.", "role_mapping": "Interdependent tasks -> contributing parts; shared outcome -> dependency basis.", "slug": "task_interdependence", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b013_a06_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when success depends on complementarity among unlike parts: a curriculum needs lessons, practice, feedback, and assessment; a policy package needs incentives, rules, enforcement, services, and communication; a software system needs modules, interfaces, data flows, permissions, and operations; a team needs roles, skills, decision rights, and collaboration routines. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Multiple teams, disciplines, modules, policy instruments, lessons, or tools must contribute to one outcome.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Multiple teams, disciplines, modules, policy instruments, lessons, or tools must contribute to one outcome.", "It is especially useful when success depends on complementarity among unlike parts: a curriculum needs lessons, practice, feedback, and assessment; a policy package needs incentives, rules, enforcement, services, and communication; a software system needs modules, interfaces, data flows, permissions, and operations; a team needs roles, skills, decision rights, and collaboration routines."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Task Interdependence", "one_liner": "Tasks rely on each other.", "page_ref": "prime:task_interdependence", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Interdependent tasks -> contributing parts; shared outcome -> dependency basis.", "slug": "task_interdependence", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires tasks linked through pooled, sequential, reciprocal, or team dependencies over shared outputs or resources."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Multiple teams, disciplines, modules, policy instruments, lessons, or tools must contribute to one outcome.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P011-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must involve numerous local decisions within a common design, preserving the source quantifier rather than merely two.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A design contains many local decisions.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve local adequacy rather than explain failure by defective individual decisions.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The decisions are acceptable or good when assessed locally.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require absence or invisibility of an interaction account.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "No visible account explains how the local decisions interact.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "A design contains many locally good decisions but has no visible account of how those decisions interact.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "locally good decisions lack a visible interaction account", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P011-C08-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A compositional system declares how combination determines the whole and need not lack an interaction account.", "slug": "compositionality"}], "residual_id": "r:compositional_assembly:b013_a06_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b013_a06_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A design has many good local decisions but no visible account of how they interact. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A design has many good local decisions but no visible account of how they interact."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A compositional system declares how combination determines the whole and need not lack an interaction account.", "slug": "compositionality"}], "normalized_requirement": "Many good local decisions exist without a visible account of their interactions.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Many good local decisions exist without a visible account of their interactions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires directional information, artifact, approval, shared-resource, or skill dependencies among tasks.", "role_mapping": "Dependency typology -> dependencies/handoffs; coupling -> non-independent assembly.", "slug": "task_interdependence", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b013_a06_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The system requires dependencies, handoffs, sequence, or compatibility constraints that cannot be assumed. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The system requires dependencies, handoffs, sequence, or compatibility constraints that cannot be assumed."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Task Interdependence", "one_liner": "Tasks rely on each other.", "page_ref": "prime:task_interdependence", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Dependency typology -> dependencies/handoffs; coupling -> non-independent assembly.", "slug": "task_interdependence", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires directional information, artifact, approval, shared-resource, or skill dependencies among tasks."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The whole requires dependencies, handoffs, sequence, or compatibility constraints that cannot be assumed.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P011-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern recurring assembly choices rather than one isolated decision.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Assembly decisions occur repeatedly across instances.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require absence of a stable reusable rule for composition.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "No reusable composition rule governs the repeated decisions.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve ad hoc case-by-case choice in contrast with rule-governed composition.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The repeated assembly decisions are made ad hoc rather than by applying such a rule.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Assembly decisions recur, are made ad hoc, and lack a reusable composition rule that governs them.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "repeated assembly decisions remain ad hoc without a reusable composition rule", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P011-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A stable part-and-combinator rule is the missing solution rather than evidence of ad hoc assembly.", "slug": "compositionality"}], "residual_id": "r:compositional_assembly:b013_a06_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b013_a06_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Repeated assembly decisions are being made ad hoc. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Repeated assembly decisions are being made ad hoc."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A stable part-and-combinator rule is the missing solution rather than evidence of ad hoc assembly.", "slug": "compositionality"}], "normalized_requirement": "Repeated assembly decisions are made ad hoc without a reusable composition rule.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Repeated assembly decisions are made ad hoc without a reusable composition rule.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 13, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-013", "ledger_sha256": "5e56b18bf80bce86f74750f754385e0ffb65f7a0b0abe36f7f3a510db93d77e9"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Compositional Attention Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:compositional_attention_design", "slug": "compositional_attention_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a mismatch between intended meaning and perceived arrangement. Designers, educators, architects, analysts, or communicators may know which elements matter and how they relate, but the audience encounters a field whose salience, spacing, grouping, and order imply something else.\n\nA common symptom is the phrase “but it’s all there.” The information, control, object, or instruction may indeed be present, yet its placement makes it secondary, disconnected, ambiguous, or invisible. The composition fails not because the parts are absent, but because the whole does not speak.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "The elements needed for understanding or action are present, but their arrangement fails to communicate priority, relation, sequence, or meaning. People therefore attend to the wrong thing, miss the intended structure, or act on an accidental reading of the field."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P011-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include an audience and a set of parts composing an intended whole.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An audience is presented with the parts required for an intended whole.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve successful perception or availability of the component parts.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The audience perceives the required parts.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail failed whole-level understanding despite part-level perception.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The audience does not apprehend the intended whole composed from those parts.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the contrast rather than treating both levels as successful or both as failed.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Part-level success coexists with whole-level failure in the same presentation.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "An audience perceives all required parts but fails to apprehend the intended whole they compose.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "an audience perceives required parts but misses their intended whole", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P011-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Perceptual organization can successfully reveal a whole and does not require the intended whole to be missed.", "slug": "gestalt_principles"}], "residual_id": "r:compositional_attention_design:b013_a07_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b013_a07_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The audience sees the right parts but misses the intended whole. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The audience sees the right parts but misses the intended whole."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Perceptual organization can successfully reveal a whole and does not require the intended whole to be missed.", "slug": "gestalt_principles"}], "normalized_requirement": "The audience sees the required parts but misses the intended whole.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The audience sees the required parts but misses the intended whole.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires element-complete representation whose encoded relation diverges from the target relation and changes inference or action.", "role_mapping": "Present elements -> completeness trap; arrangement -> encoded relation; hidden relation -> divergence.", "slug": "representational_structure_mismatch", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b013_a07_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Important relationships are implied by the content but not legible from the arrangement. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Important relationships are implied by the content but not legible from the arrangement."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Representational Structure Mismatch", "one_liner": "A representation preserves its target's elements but misstates one or more task-relevant relations among them, so content can appear complete while its shape licenses the wrong traversal, inference, or action.", "page_ref": "prime:representational_structure_mismatch", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Present elements -> completeness trap; arrangement -> encoded relation; hidden relation -> divergence.", "slug": "representational_structure_mismatch", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires element-complete representation whose encoded relation diverges from the target relation and changes inference or action."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "All elements are present but their arrangement misstates or hides a task-relevant relation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P011-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include a task-facing person and locations to which attention can be directed.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A user, reader, visitor, decision-maker, or comparable task-facing person allocates attention among locations.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve initial ordering rather than an error at any later time.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The relevant attention allocation occurs first in the person's task sequence.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail misdirected first attention, not merely broad or divided attention.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The first attended location is wrong for the intended task or decision.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "A task-facing person directs initial attention to the wrong location.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "initial attention is directed to the wrong location", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P011-C11-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P011-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include a task-facing navigator and a sequence of possible locations or actions.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A user, reader, visitor, decision-maker, or comparable task-facing person is navigating a sequence or field.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern immediate next-step inference rather than a general destination or final goal.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The required inference concerns the next location or action.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail inability to infer the next navigation step.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The person cannot infer where to go or what to do next.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "A task-facing person cannot infer the next location or action in a navigation sequence.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "the next navigation step cannot be inferred", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P011-C11-U2"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A focal point is the design response and can guide attention correctly.", "slug": "emphasis_focal_point"}], "residual_id": "r:compositional_attention_design:b013_a07_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b013_a07_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Users, readers, visitors, or decision-makers look in the wrong place first or cannot tell where to go next. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Users, readers, visitors, or decision-makers look in the wrong place first or cannot tell where to go next."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PARTIALLY_DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A hard task with all three location facts present is explicitly excluded, showing that next-step inferability rather than task difficulty is load-bearing.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Orientation Loss", "one_liner": "Diagnose why a competent user gets lost by checking three location facts — where am I, what can I move to, how did I arrive — at each transition seam, reading the orientation state off the count of missing facts regardless of substrate.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:orientation_loss", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "orientation_loss"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "orientation_loss", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P011-C11-U2", "why_it_fits": "The exact core and signature directly state the navigation, next-action, and inability relation."}], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 2, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 1, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A focal point is the design response and can guide attention correctly.", "slug": "emphasis_focal_point"}], "normalized_requirement": "Users attend to the wrong location first or cannot infer the next navigation step.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "PARTIAL_EXISTING_DSA_GROUNDING", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation grounded 1 of 2 eligible atomic units; the remaining unit or units stayed open."}, "predicate": "Users attend to the wrong location first or cannot infer the next navigation step.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P011-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must apply to a presented informational field and its recipients.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A display, space, page, interface, presentation, or comparable field presents information to recipients.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve informational completeness rather than explain inconsistency by missing content.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The presented field contains all information necessary for the intended interpretation.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail divergence among interpretations across people or occasions, not merely one mistaken reading.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Interpretations of the field differ inconsistently across recipients or occasions.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must connect presentation structure to interpretive inconsistency under complete information.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The presented field produces the inconsistent interpretations despite its informational completeness.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "An informationally complete presented field produces inconsistent interpretations across recipients or occasions.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "complete presented information produces inconsistent interpretation", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P011-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "That prime requires divergence between presentation and a machine-readable semantic layer, not merely inconsistent human interpretation.", "slug": "presentational_semantic_mismatch"}], "residual_id": "r:compositional_attention_design:b013_a07_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b013_a07_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A display, space, page, interface, or presentation contains all necessary information but produces inconsistent interpretation. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A display, space, page, interface, or presentation contains all necessary information but produces inconsistent interpretation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "That prime requires divergence between presentation and a machine-readable semantic layer, not merely inconsistent human interpretation.", "slug": "presentational_semantic_mismatch"}], "normalized_requirement": "A complete display, page, space, interface, or presentation produces inconsistent interpretation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A complete display, page, space, interface, or presentation produces inconsistent interpretation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P011-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include multiple elements whose salience competes within one field.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Two or more presented elements compete for attention or salience.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must make competition causally responsible for the emphasis outcome.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Competition among the elements creates the resulting emphasis pattern.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail false or distorted priority rather than merely strong emphasis.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The resulting emphasis misstates the intended priority of the elements.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Competition among presented elements creates a false salience ranking, such as making secondary material appear primary.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "competing elements create false emphasis", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P011-C13-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A focal point can correctly rank primary material and does not require false emphasis.", "slug": "emphasis_focal_point"}], "residual_id": "r:compositional_attention_design:b013_a07_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b013_a07_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The designer knows the intended priority and relationship among elements, but the audience encounters a perceptual field whose salience, spacing, grouping, and sequence create a different structure. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Competing elements create false emphasis or make secondary material appear primary.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Competing elements create false emphasis or make secondary material appear primary.", "The designer knows the intended priority and relationship among elements, but the audience encounters a perceptual field whose salience, spacing, grouping, and sequence create a different structure."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Holding the exact DSA and mapped roles fixed, no complete instance can falsify the satisfied DNF branch without contradicting the exact signature.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Red Herring", "one_liner": "Deflect a discussion by introducing material irrelevant to the open question, so attention and the conversational floor shift to the new topic and the original question is left feeling-addressed-but-unanswered — the test being whether the new material does any work on the claim that was open.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:red_herring", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "red_herring"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "red_herring", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P011-C13-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record entails a complete DNF branch under a subtype-preserving mapping; no qualifier or solution-operation substitution is needed."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Competing elements create false emphasis or make secondary material appear primary.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 13, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-013", "ledger_sha256": "5e56b18bf80bce86f74750f754385e0ffb65f7a0b0abe36f7f3a510db93d77e9"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Compositional Meaning Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:compositional_meaning_design", "slug": "compositional_meaning_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is miscomposition. Parts that look clear in isolation combine into an unclear, contradictory, misleading, or invalid whole. This can happen through ambiguous scope, invalid slot substitution, bad sequence, untested exceptions, conflicting visual modifiers, or schemas that validate syntax but not meaning.\n\nThe root tension is between reuse and interpretation. Reusable components make systems scalable, but they also create more possible assemblies than any reviewer can inspect manually unless the composition rules are explicit.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Parts of a message, symbol system, interface, legal text, template, or schema are meaningful in isolation, but their combination produces ambiguity, contradiction, unintended scope, invalid affordance, or a whole meaning that no part individually signaled."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Compositional meaning can exist without a team or reusable artifact modules.", "slug": "compositionality"}], "residual_id": "r:compositional_meaning_design:b013_a08_c1", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b013_a08_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when a message, interface, policy, visual language, schema, or modular content system is assembled from reusable components and the assembly itself affects interpretation. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Teams assemble messages, screens, clauses, templates, icons, fields, or procedures from reusable modules.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Teams assemble messages, screens, clauses, templates, icons, fields, or procedures from reusable modules.", "Use this archetype when a message, interface, policy, visual language, schema, or modular content system is assembled from reusable components and the assembly itself affects interpretation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Compositional meaning can exist without a team or reusable artifact modules.", "slug": "compositionality"}], "normalized_requirement": "Teams assemble messages, screens, clauses, templates, icons, fields, or procedures from reusable modules.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Teams assemble messages, screens, clauses, templates, icons, fields, or procedures from reusable modules.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P011-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include a localized meaning-bearing or modifying element within a larger composition.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A local modifier, exception, condition, label, operator, color, badge, sequence, or comparable element participates in a composite whole.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail a directed scope effect from the local element to the whole.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The local element changes the meaning, behavior, or interpretation of the composite whole.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require actual scope to exceed intended scope, not merely permit a broad intended effect.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The actual scope of the element's effect is broader than its intended scope.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "A local meaning-bearing or modifying element changes a broader portion of the composite whole than intended.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "a local modifier has unintended whole-level scope", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P011-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A correct composition function can give a modifier broad scope intentionally.", "slug": "compositionality"}], "residual_id": "r:compositional_meaning_design:b013_a08_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b013_a08_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This can happen through ambiguous scope, invalid slot substitution, bad sequence, untested exceptions, conflicting visual modifiers, or schemas that validate syntax but not meaning. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A modifier, exception, condition, label, operator, color, badge, or sequence changes more of the whole than intended.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A modifier, exception, condition, label, operator, color, badge, or sequence changes more of the whole than intended.", "This can happen through ambiguous scope, invalid slot substitution, bad sequence, untested exceptions, conflicting visual modifiers, or schemas that validate syntax but not meaning."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A genuinely optional field whose absence is meaningful everywhere is explicitly excluded, and it also lacks the atom's local-versus-whole scope mismatch.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Temporary Field", "one_liner": "The code smell in which an object carries an instance variable meaningful only during one operation or state yet visible as permanent structural state everywhere — a mismatch between the field's structural scope (every instance) and its validity scope (the subset where it holds a real value).", "page_ref": "domain_specific:temporary_field", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "temporary_field"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "temporary_field", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P011-C14-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact structural-scope/validity-scope mismatch directly instantiates all obligations."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A modifier, exception, condition, label, operator, color, badge, or sequence changes more of the whole than intended.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Compositionality makes whole meaning systematically calculable and need not yield misinterpretation.", "slug": "compositionality"}], "residual_id": "r:compositional_meaning_design:b013_a08_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b013_a08_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Local review approves individual parts but users, readers, or systems misinterpret the assembled result. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Local review approves individual parts but users, readers, or systems misinterpret the assembled result."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Compositionality makes whole meaning systematically calculable and need not yield misinterpretation.", "slug": "compositionality"}], "normalized_requirement": "Parts pass local review while users or systems misinterpret the assembled result.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Parts pass local review while users or systems misinterpret the assembled result.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P011-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must compare multiple teams using an identical component set.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Two or more teams work with the same set of parts.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve variation in composition while holding the parts constant.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The teams combine the shared parts in different ways.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must connect composition differences to inconsistent semantic outputs.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The different combinations produce meanings that are inconsistent across teams.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Two or more teams combine the same parts differently, and those different combinations produce inconsistent meanings.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "different cross-team combinations of the same parts produce inconsistent meanings", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P011-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A fixed combinator and valuation determine one meaning for the same structured expression.", "slug": "compositionality"}], "residual_id": "r:compositional_meaning_design:b013_a08_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b013_a08_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Different teams combine the same parts differently and produce inconsistent meanings. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Different teams combine the same parts differently and produce inconsistent meanings."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A fixed combinator and valuation determine one meaning for the same structured expression.", "slug": "compositionality"}], "normalized_requirement": "Different teams combine the same parts into inconsistent meanings.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Different teams combine the same parts into inconsistent meanings.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires whole value to depend on both part values and the combinator, so part values alone do not determine the result.", "role_mapping": "Part values -> locally meaningful components; combinator -> slots/sequence/rule; whole value -> assembly validity.", "slug": "compositionality", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b013_a08_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The system has slots, sequences, or rule-governed assemblies whose validity cannot be inferred from part validity alone. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The system has slots, sequences, or rule-governed assemblies whose validity cannot be inferred from part validity alone."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Compositionality", "one_liner": "Meaning from parts.", "page_ref": "prime:compositionality", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Part values -> locally meaningful components; combinator -> slots/sequence/rule; whole value -> assembly validity.", "slug": "compositionality", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires whole value to depend on both part values and the combinator, so part values alone do not determine the result."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A slot-, sequence-, or rule-governed assembly has whole validity that cannot be inferred from part validity alone.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P012-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require a reusable semantic library or system whose component inventory expands.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A design, document, schema, icon, policy, or comparable semantic system contains a growing library of reusable parts.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include composition rules applying to combinations of the growing parts.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Rules govern how the system's parts may be composed.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail that component growth outpaces rule coverage, not merely that both change.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The library grows faster than the composition rules are developed or maintained.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "A reusable semantic library grows faster than the rules governing composition of its parts.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "a reusable semantic system expands faster than its composition rules", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P012-C01-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A compositional system can scale with a stable rule inventory and does not require rule lag.", "slug": "compositionality"}], "residual_id": "r:compositional_meaning_design:b013_a08_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b013_a08_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A design system, document system, schema, icon language, or policy library grows faster than its composition rules. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A design system, document system, schema, icon language, or policy library grows faster than its composition rules."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A compositional system can scale with a stable rule inventory and does not require rule lag.", "slug": "compositionality"}], "normalized_requirement": "A design, document, schema, icon, or policy library grows faster than its composition rules.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A design, document, schema, icon, or policy library grows faster than its composition rules.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 13, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-013", "ledger_sha256": "5e56b18bf80bce86f74750f754385e0ffb65f7a0b0abe36f7f3a510db93d77e9"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Compounding Advantage Flywheel Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:compounding_advantage_flywheel_design", "slug": "compounding_advantage_flywheel_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system has a potential increasing-returns dynamic, but the cumulative state, marginal-return driver, reinvestment path, and downside guardrails are implicit or fragmented. Without design, the loop may never reach critical mass, may waste early subsidies, may plateau without warning, or may compound into harmful lock-in, market concentration, bubbles, inequitable access, or fragile dependence on one platform, standard, dataset, supplier, or institution.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system has a potential increasing-returns dynamic, but the cumulative state, marginal-return driver, reinvestment path, and downside guardrails are implicit or fragmented. Without design, the loop may never reach critical mass, may waste early subsidies, may plateau without warning, or may compound into harmful lock-in, market concentration, bubbles, inequitable access, or fragile dependence on one platform, standard, dataset, supplier, or institution."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires marginal benefit to rise, or marginal cost to fall, as cumulative adoption, scale, or experience grows.", "role_mapping": "Cumulative state -> added units; rising payoff -> next unit more valuable or cheaper.", "slug": "increasing_returns", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b013_a09_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Each added user, unit, transaction, lesson, data point, complement, asset, or standard can make the next one more valuable, cheaper, faster, or easier to acquire. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Each added user, unit, transaction, lesson, data point, complement, asset, or standard can make the next one more valuable, cheaper, faster, or easier to acquire."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Increasing Returns", "one_liner": "Marginal benefit of each additional unit rises rather than falls as the cumulative state grows, compounding advantage.", "page_ref": "prime:increasing_returns", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Cumulative state -> added units; rising payoff -> next unit more valuable or cheaper.", "slug": "increasing_returns", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires marginal benefit to rise, or marginal cost to fall, as cumulative adoption, scale, or experience grows."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Each added unit raises the value or lowers the acquisition cost of the next unit.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime explicitly spans network effects, learning, scale, cumulative advantage, and self-reinforcing payoff gradients.", "role_mapping": "Reinforcement channel -> listed mechanism; cumulative quantity -> accumulated state.", "slug": "increasing_returns", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b013_a09_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The system shows network effects, learning curves, economies of scale, data accumulation, reputation accumulation, complement ecosystems, fixed-cost amortization, or reusable capability stocks. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The system shows network effects, learning curves, economies of scale, data accumulation, reputation accumulation, complement ecosystems, fixed-cost amortization, or reusable capability stocks."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Increasing Returns", "one_liner": "Marginal benefit of each additional unit rises rather than falls as the cumulative state grows, compounding advantage.", "page_ref": "prime:increasing_returns", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Reinforcement channel -> listed mechanism; cumulative quantity -> accumulated state.", "slug": "increasing_returns", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime explicitly spans network effects, learning, scale, cumulative advantage, and self-reinforcing payoff gradients."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The system exhibits network effects, learning curves, economies of scale, data or reputation accumulation, complement ecosystems, amortization, or another increasing-return channel.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Increasing marginal return can begin immediately and need not have an early adoption barrier.", "slug": "increasing_returns"}], "residual_id": "r:compounding_advantage_flywheel_design:b013_a09_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b013_a09_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Early adoption or investment is hard because the loop has not yet generated enough value to become self-reinforcing. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Early adoption or investment is hard because the loop has not yet generated enough value to become self-reinforcing."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Increasing marginal return can begin immediately and need not have an early adoption barrier.", "slug": "increasing_returns"}], "normalized_requirement": "Early adoption or investment is difficult because the loop has not generated enough value to reinforce itself.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Early adoption or investment is difficult because the loop has not generated enough value to reinforce itself.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Increasing returns can remain broadly shared and need not create harmful concentration or exclusion.", "slug": "increasing_returns"}], "residual_id": "r:compounding_advantage_flywheel_design:b013_a09_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b013_a09_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Benefits may compound unevenly, creating opportunity asymmetry, winner-take-all dynamics, exclusion, dependency, or regulatory risk. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Benefits may compound unevenly, creating opportunity asymmetry, winner-take-all dynamics, exclusion, dependency, or regulatory risk."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Increasing returns can remain broadly shared and need not create harmful concentration or exclusion.", "slug": "increasing_returns"}], "normalized_requirement": "Compounding benefits may create opportunity asymmetry, winner-take-all dynamics, exclusion, dependency, or regulatory risk.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Compounding benefits may create opportunity asymmetry, winner-take-all dynamics, exclusion, dependency, or regulatory risk.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires expectations-driven positive feedback, detachment from fundamentals, overshoot, inflow exhaustion, and discontinuous reversal.", "role_mapping": "Measured growth -> rising price/value; real value -> fundamentals; saturation/reversal -> bubble collapse.", "slug": "speculative_bubble", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b013_a09_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The curve may saturate, reverse, or turn speculative if the measured growth is not tied to real value creation. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The curve may saturate, reverse, or turn speculative if the measured growth is not tied to real value creation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Speculative Bubble", "one_liner": "Self-reinforcing price rise detached from fundamental value.", "page_ref": "prime:speculative_bubble", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Measured growth -> rising price/value; real value -> fundamentals; saturation/reversal -> bubble collapse.", "slug": "speculative_bubble", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires expectations-driven positive feedback, detachment from fundamentals, overshoot, inflow exhaustion, and discontinuous reversal."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The growth curve may saturate, reverse, or turn speculative when measured growth is not tied to real value creation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Decision-makers need to know whether to seed, subsidize, standardize, consolidate, open interfaces, reinvest, slow down, diversify, or cap the loop.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: Decision-makers need to know whether to seed, subsidize, standardize, consolidate, open interfaces, reinvest, slow down, diversify, or cap the loop. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Decision-makers need to know whether to seed, subsidize, standardize, consolidate, open interfaces, reinvest, slow down, diversify, or cap the loop."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Decision-makers need to know whether to seed, subsidize, standardize, consolidate, open interfaces, reinvest, slow down, diversify, or cap the loop."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 13, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-013", "ledger_sha256": "5e56b18bf80bce86f74750f754385e0ffb65f7a0b0abe36f7f3a510db93d77e9"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Compounding Control", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:compounding_control", "slug": "compounding_control"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a trajectory problem. A process compounds over iterations, and the compounding effect makes ordinary local correction too slow. Each step may look acceptable when judged alone, but the sequence produces a runaway path: growing debt, escalating penalties, contagious spread, increasing concentration, trust erosion, technical fragility, or accelerating maintenance cost.\n\nThis creates a governance mismatch. Decision makers see current level, but the system is shaped by rate, acceleration, and the multiplier between cycles. By the time the current level becomes obviously unacceptable, the multiplier may have already made intervention costly, punitive, or ineffective.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A process compounds over iterations, making small differences grow rapidly into runaway gains, losses, debt, risk, or concentration."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a quantity updated by repeated multiplication in discrete or continuous time.", "role_mapping": "Quantity -> state variable; base/rate -> per-cycle multiplier; exponent -> repeated cycles.", "slug": "exponentiation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b013_a10_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A state variable grows, decays, concentrates, or erodes through repeated cycles. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A state variable grows, decays, concentrates, or erodes through repeated cycles."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Exponentiation", "one_liner": "Repeated multiplication scaling.", "page_ref": "prime:exponentiation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Quantity -> state variable; base/rate -> per-cycle multiplier; exponent -> repeated cycles.", "slug": "exponentiation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a quantity updated by repeated multiplication in discrete or continuous time."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A state variable grows, decays, concentrates, or erodes through repeated cycles.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a slow history-shaped process to modify the parameters governing later first-order adaptation.", "role_mapping": "Prior activity -> earlier changes; governed parameters -> later rate or readiness.", "slug": "metaplasticity", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b013_a10_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It fits when small differences grow disproportionately because earlier states influence later states. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Earlier changes alter the rate, capacity, exposure, or probability of later changes.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Earlier changes alter the rate, capacity, exposure, or probability of later changes.", "It fits when small differences grow disproportionately because earlier states influence later states."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Metaplasticity", "one_liner": "A system's capacity to change is itself modulated by prior activity, so a slow second-order process governs how readily the fast first-order adaptive process can operate.", "page_ref": "prime:metaplasticity", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Prior activity -> earlier changes; governed parameters -> later rate or readiness.", "slug": "metaplasticity", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a slow history-shaped process to modify the parameters governing later first-order adaptation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Earlier changes alter the rate, capacity, exposure, or probability of later changes.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires repeated proportional shocks whose product compounds a positive state into asymmetric level outcomes.", "role_mapping": "Proportional shocks -> small differences; repeated product -> amplified divergence.", "slug": "multiplicative_random_growth", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b013_a10_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It fits when small differences grow disproportionately because earlier states influence later states. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Small differences, delays, or advantages become disproportionately large over time.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Small differences, delays, or advantages become disproportionately large over time.", "It fits when small differences grow disproportionately because earlier states influence later states."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Multiplicative Random Growth", "one_liner": "Independent proportional shocks compound a positive state multiplicatively, so its logarithm follows an additive random walk and, under finite-variance increments, its cross-sectional distribution tends toward log-normal.", "page_ref": "prime:multiplicative_random_growth", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Proportional shocks -> small differences; repeated product -> amplified divergence.", "slug": "multiplicative_random_growth", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires repeated proportional shocks whose product compounds a positive state into asymmetric level outcomes."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Small differences, delays, or advantages become disproportionately large over time.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires an expedient choice to leave a principal whose friction charges interest on each future operation and compounds with growth.", "role_mapping": "Expedient -> delayed correction; interest -> rising cost; pay-down -> correction.", "slug": "technical_debt", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b013_a10_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Late correction is more expensive, less legitimate, or less effective than early damping or paydown. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Late correction is more expensive, less legitimate, or less effective than early damping or paydown."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Technical Debt", "one_liner": "A present expedient choice imposes a future cost that compounds with system growth until it is paid down, with a principal, an interest payment, and a pay-down.", "page_ref": "prime:technical_debt", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Expedient -> delayed correction; interest -> rising cost; pay-down -> correction.", "slug": "technical_debt", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires an expedient choice to leave a principal whose friction charges interest on each future operation and compounds with growth."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Late correction is more expensive, less legitimate, or less effective than early damping or paydown.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Control must preserve useful activity while stopping runaway dynamics.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Compounding can create powerful useful growth, but the same repeated multiplication can turn small gaps, debts, risks, delays, or advantages into runaway trajectories. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: Control must preserve useful activity while stopping runaway dynamics. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Control must preserve useful activity while stopping runaway dynamics.", "Compounding can create powerful useful growth, but the same repeated multiplication can turn small gaps, debts, risks, delays, or advantages into runaway trajectories."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Control must preserve useful activity while stopping runaway dynamics."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 13, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-013", "ledger_sha256": "5e56b18bf80bce86f74750f754385e0ffb65f7a0b0abe36f7f3a510db93d77e9"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Compounding Leverage", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:compounding_leverage", "slug": "compounding_leverage"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Organizations and systems often harvest each gain once. Lessons remain tacit, savings are\nimmediately refilled, surplus is fully consumed, and reusable assets are undiscoverable.\nEvery cycle therefore restarts from nearly the same base. Conversely, apparent compounding\nmay be financed by subsidy, extracted from others, or projected beyond the regime where its\nrate applies. The design problem is to create a real recurrence without creating a runaway.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Useful gains repeatedly occur but remain isolated, are consumed, forgotten, leaked, or fail to expand the capacity that produced them, so improvement stays linear or episodic."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Rising marginal returns need not be organized as a repeatable cycle with a measured beneficial yield.", "slug": "increasing_returns"}], "residual_id": "r:compounding_leverage:b013_a11_c1", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b013_a11_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use it when a cycle reliably produces beneficial yield, some yield can be retained, and. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A repeatable cycle produces a measurable beneficial yield.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A repeatable cycle produces a measurable beneficial yield.", "Use it when a cycle reliably produces beneficial yield, some yield can be retained, and"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Rising marginal returns need not be organized as a repeatable cycle with a measured beneficial yield.", "slug": "increasing_returns"}], "normalized_requirement": "A repeatable cycle produces a measurable beneficial yield.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A repeatable cycle produces a measurable beneficial yield.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Value changing with time need not be reinvested into the capacity that produced it.", "slug": "time_value_of_money"}], "residual_id": "r:compounding_leverage:b013_a11_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b013_a11_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Some yield can be retained and converted into future productive capacity. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Some yield can be retained and converted into future productive capacity."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Value changing with time need not be reinvested into the capacity that produced it.", "slug": "time_value_of_money"}], "normalized_requirement": "Some yield can be retained and converted into later productive capacity.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Some yield can be retained and converted into later productive capacity.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Growth on a larger population base need not result from retained beneficial yield or increased productive capability.", "slug": "logistic_growth"}], "residual_id": "r:compounding_leverage:b013_a11_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b013_a11_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Every cycle therefore restarts from nearly the same base. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Later cycles can operate on a larger or more capable base than earlier cycles.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Later cycles can operate on a larger or more capable base than earlier cycles.", "Every cycle therefore restarts from nearly the same base."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Growth on a larger population base need not result from retained beneficial yield or increased productive capability.", "slug": "logistic_growth"}], "normalized_requirement": "Later cycles can operate on a larger or more capable base than earlier cycles.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Later cycles can operate on a larger or more capable base than earlier cycles.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The time horizon is long enough for recurrence to matter.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The time horizon is long enough for recurrence to matter. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The time horizon is long enough for recurrence to matter."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The time horizon is long enough for recurrence to matter."}, {"display_text": "Leakage, decay, congestion, and saturation can be observed and governed.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The system must expose leakage and saturation and retain authority to slow or stop. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: Leakage, decay, congestion, and saturation can be observed and governed. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Leakage, decay, congestion, and saturation can be observed and governed.", "The system must expose leakage and saturation and retain authority to slow or stop."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Leakage, decay, congestion, and saturation can be observed and governed."}, {"display_text": "Growth can be bounded before it creates unacceptable concentration, fragility, or externality.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Reinvestment delays present consumption and adds path dependence, while excessive reinvestment can magnify defects, concentration, or fragility. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: Growth can be bounded before it creates unacceptable concentration, fragility, or externality. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Growth can be bounded before it creates unacceptable concentration, fragility, or externality.", "Reinvestment delays present consumption and adds path dependence, while excessive reinvestment can magnify defects, concentration, or fragility."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Growth can be bounded before it creates unacceptable concentration, fragility, or externality."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 13, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-013", "ledger_sha256": "5e56b18bf80bce86f74750f754385e0ffb65f7a0b0abe36f7f3a510db93d77e9"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Computability Boundary Mapping", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:computability_boundary_mapping", "slug": "computability_boundary_mapping"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 5, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 6 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A project assumes that every sufficiently precise question can be turned into a total algorithm, or treats repeated implementation failure as proof that no algorithm can exist. The problem class, input encoding, computational capabilities, universal quantifiers, and required guarantee are left implicit. As a result, teams may pursue impossible universal automation, mislabel an expensive but computable problem as undecidable, present one-sided search as a decision procedure, or cite an impossibility theorem whose assumptions do not match the deployed system.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A project assumes that every sufficiently precise question can be turned into a total algorithm, or treats repeated implementation failure as proof that no algorithm can exist. The problem class, input encoding, computational capabilities, universal quantifiers, and required guarantee are left implicit. As a result, teams may pursue impossible universal automation, mislabel an expensive but computable problem as undecidable, present one-sided search as a decision procedure, or cite an impossibility theorem whose assumptions do not match the deployed system."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a uniform finite procedure that always terminates with the correct verdict for every instance in a yes-or-no class.", "role_mapping": "Question class -> open-ended inputs; candidate procedure -> required algorithm; guarantee -> correct termination.", "slug": "decidability_computability", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b013_a12_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The problem class, input encoding, computational capabilities, universal quantifiers, and required guarantee are left implicit. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A requirement asks for a correct answer and guaranteed termination for every member of an open-ended or unbounded input class.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A requirement asks for a correct answer and guaranteed termination for every member of an open-ended or unbounded input class.", "The problem class, input encoding, computational capabilities, universal quantifiers, and required guarantee are left implicit."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Decidability Computability", "one_liner": "A class of yes/no questions admits a finite procedure that always terminates with the correct answer.", "page_ref": "prime:decidability_computability", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Question class -> open-ended inputs; candidate procedure -> required algorithm; guarantee -> correct termination.", "slug": "decidability_computability", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a uniform finite procedure that always terminates with the correct verdict for every instance in a yes-or-no class."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A requirement asks for a correct answer and guaranteed termination for every member of an open-ended or unbounded input class.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A computability boundary can be studied without a product proposal for universal automation.", "slug": "computability"}], "residual_id": "r:computability_boundary_mapping:b013_a12_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b013_a12_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A universal analyzer, verifier, classifier, solver, or synthesis engine is proposed for arbitrary programs, formulas, policies, models, or processes. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A universal analyzer, verifier, classifier, solver, or synthesis engine is proposed for arbitrary programs, formulas, policies, models, or processes."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A computability boundary can be studied without a product proposal for universal automation.", "slug": "computability"}], "normalized_requirement": "A universal analyzer, verifier, classifier, solver, or synthesizer is proposed for arbitrary programs, formulas, policies, models, or processes.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A universal analyzer, verifier, classifier, solver, or synthesizer is proposed for arbitrary programs, formulas, policies, models, or processes.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A decidable class has a total correct terminating procedure; looping search describes a semidecidable or incomplete method instead.", "slug": "decidability_computability"}], "residual_id": "r:computability_boundary_mapping:b013_a12_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b013_a12_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Search succeeds on many examples but can run forever or return unknown on other cases. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Search succeeds on many examples but can run forever or return unknown on other cases."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A decidable class has a total correct terminating procedure; looping search describes a semidecidable or incomplete method instead.", "slug": "decidability_computability"}], "normalized_requirement": "Search succeeds on many instances but can run forever or return unknown on others.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Search succeeds on many instances but can run forever or return unknown on others.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P012-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include a deployed product or product-like system and an input governed by a computational guarantee.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A product receives or may receive an input subject to a computational guarantee.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require an explicit handling disposition rather than merely recognizing the boundary.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The product must determine how to handle the out-of-guarantee input.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must place the input outside a fragment for which termination with a decision is guaranteed.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A complete branch is that the input lies outside a decidable fragment.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must place the input beyond the scope of an established proof or guarantee bound.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A complete branch is that the input lies beyond a proven bound.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "A product must define handling for inputs outside a decidable fragment or beyond a proven guarantee bound.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "a product must handle inputs outside its established computational guarantee", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P012-C02-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A decidable class need not sit inside a product with out-of-fragment inputs.", "slug": "decidability_computability"}], "residual_id": "r:computability_boundary_mapping:b013_a12_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b013_a12_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A product must decide how to handle inputs outside a decidable fragment or beyond a proven bound. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A product must decide how to handle inputs outside a decidable fragment or beyond a proven bound."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A decidable class need not sit inside a product with out-of-fragment inputs.", "slug": "decidability_computability"}], "normalized_requirement": "A product must handle inputs outside a decidable fragment or beyond a proven bound.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A product must handle inputs outside a decidable fragment or beyond a proven bound.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P012-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include a system and an external element on which its operation or result depends.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A system depends on an expert, service, oracle, sensor, certificate, interaction, or comparable external element.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must make the external element computationally load-bearing rather than incidental.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The external element performs or supplies part of the effective computation, information, validation, or interaction.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require absence of an explicit account of what computational contribution the dependency supplies.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The external element's computational role is not stated.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "A system relies on an external contributor or interaction whose computational role is unstated.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "a required external computational dependency has an unspecified role", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P012-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A formal computability boundary declares an admissible procedure class and need not hide an oracle role.", "slug": "computability"}], "residual_id": "r:computability_boundary_mapping:b013_a12_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b013_a12_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The system relies on an expert, external service, oracle, sensor, certificate, or interaction step whose computational role is not stated. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The system relies on an expert, external service, oracle, sensor, certificate, or interaction step whose computational role is not stated."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A formal computability boundary declares an admissible procedure class and need not hide an oracle role.", "slug": "computability"}], "normalized_requirement": "The computational role of an expert, service, oracle, sensor, certificate, or interaction step is unstated.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The computational role of an expert, service, oracle, sensor, certificate, or interaction step is unstated.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Some expressive extensions remain computable, so expressiveness growth does not universally cross the boundary.", "slug": "computability"}], "residual_id": "r:computability_boundary_mapping:b013_a12_c8", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b013_a12_c8", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A language or rule system is becoming more expressive and existing termination or decidability guarantees may no longer hold. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A language or rule system is becoming more expressive and existing termination or decidability guarantees may no longer hold."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Some expressive extensions remain computable, so expressiveness growth does not universally cross the boundary.", "slug": "computability"}], "normalized_requirement": "Greater language or rule expressiveness threatens an existing termination or decidability guarantee.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Greater language or rule expressiveness threatens an existing termination or decidability guarantee.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [8], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A theorem, reduction, diagonal argument, or halting-problem analogy is invoked to block or justify automation.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "As a result, teams may pursue impossible universal automation, mislabel an expensive but computable problem as undecidable, present one-sided search as a decision procedure, or cite an impossibility theorem whose assumptions do not match the deployed system. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: A theorem, reduction, diagonal argument, or halting-problem analogy is invoked to block or justify automation. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A theorem, reduction, diagonal argument, or halting-problem analogy is invoked to block or justify automation.", "As a result, teams may pursue impossible universal automation, mislabel an expensive but computable problem as undecidable, present one-sided search as a decision procedure, or cite an impossibility theorem whose assumptions do not match the deployed system."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "A theorem, reduction, diagonal argument, or halting-problem analogy is invoked to block or justify automation."}, {"display_text": "The project is choosing between exact decision, sound incomplete analysis, approximation, bounded search, and human escalation.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "As a result, teams may pursue impossible universal automation, mislabel an expensive but computable problem as undecidable, present one-sided search as a decision procedure, or cite an impossibility theorem whose assumptions do not match the deployed system. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: The project is choosing between exact decision, sound incomplete analysis, approximation, bounded search, and human escalation. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The project is choosing between exact decision, sound incomplete analysis, approximation, bounded search, and human escalation.", "As a result, teams may pursue impossible universal automation, mislabel an expensive but computable problem as undecidable, present one-sided search as a decision procedure, or cite an impossibility theorem whose assumptions do not match the deployed system."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "The project is choosing between exact decision, sound incomplete analysis, approximation, bounded search, and human escalation."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 13, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-013", "ledger_sha256": "5e56b18bf80bce86f74750f754385e0ffb65f7a0b0abe36f7f3a510db93d77e9"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Conceptual Blending for Innovation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:conceptual_blending_for_innovation", "slug": "conceptual_blending_for_innovation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 2, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is conceptual confinement. The existing frame determines what counts as a plausible solution, what roles exist, what constraints matter, and what actions seem legitimate. As a result, the system keeps reusing inherited categories even when the situation has changed.\n\nAt the same time, jumping outside the frame can create incoherence. A hybrid idea may sound fresh while secretly combining incompatible assumptions, incentives, scales, or responsibilities. The archetype therefore addresses a double problem: it opens a new solution space while protecting the blend from becoming a superficial mashup.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A person, group, product team, institution, or research effort is trapped inside one conceptual space, so available options repeat the assumptions, categories, roles, and constraints of that space even when the situation calls for a new solution logic."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P012-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include an established conceptual or operational frame that constrains what options are produced.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An existing category system, model, product frame, workflow, explanation, or comparable frame structures option generation.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must connect the frame to production of the options rather than merely coexist with them.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The existing frame generates the available options.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require that the options generated by the frame are predictable; recurrence or repeated generation alone is insufficient.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The generated options are predictable products of the existing frame.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail inadequacy of the available options rather than mere familiarity.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The generated options are insufficient for the problem or need.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "An existing conceptual or operational frame generates predictable but insufficient options.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "an existing frame generates predictable but insufficient options", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P012-C04-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Blending is the proposed generator of new meaning, not the insufficiency of the current space.", "slug": "conceptual_blending"}], "residual_id": "r:conceptual_blending_for_innovation:b013_a13_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b013_a13_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A person, group, product team, institution, or research effort is trapped inside one conceptual space, so available options repeat the assumptions, categories, roles, and constraints of that space even when the situation calls for a new solution logic. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Existing categories, models, products, workflows, or explanations generate predictable but insufficient options.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Existing categories, models, products, workflows, or explanations generate predictable but insufficient options.", "A person, group, product team, institution, or research effort is trapped inside one conceptual space, so available options repeat the assumptions, categories, roles, and constraints of that space even when the situation calls for a new solution logic."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "If the category-generated conventional affordances were sufficient, the required novel affordance would not be blocked and the instance would not satisfy functional fixedness.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Functional Fixedness", "one_liner": "The cognitive bias in which encoding an object under its conventional category label crowds out inspection of its raw physical properties, blocking the solver from a non-conventional use the problem needs and the object's properties would permit.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:functional_fixedness", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "functional_fixedness"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "functional_fixedness", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P012-C04-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact category-retrieval mechanism necessarily generates a predictable conventional function-set that is insufficient for the problem's required novel use."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A familiar tool selected only after open fit comparison would falsify frame-generated predictability, but the exact anti-pattern excludes it by requiring fluency to reshape the fit question before it is asked.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Golden Hammer Anti-Pattern", "one_liner": "Diagnose a team applying its familiar technology to a poorly-fitting problem because the acquisition cost of an alternative is visible while the misfit cost is diffuse and downstream, so fluency reshapes what counts as the right tool before fit is ever asked.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:golden_hammer_anti_pattern", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "golden_hammer_anti_pattern"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "golden_hammer_anti_pattern", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P012-C04-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires an existing fluency frame to generate the predictable incumbent-tool option and requires that option to fit the problem poorly."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "If the grid generated the later incident deviation, the option set would not be insufficient in the required way and the case would cease to be a HAZOP guideword miss.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "HAZOP Guideword Miss", "one_liner": "The structural failure in which a HAZOP's finite guideword-times-parameter-times-node grid never generates the deviation that later causes an incident, because the hazard fell outside the schema's coverage boundary and was never identified, safeguarded, or risk-assessed.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:hazop_guideword_miss", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "hazop_guideword_miss"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "hazop_guideword_miss", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P012-C04-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact finite elicitation schema deterministically generates its covered options and necessarily misses a required deviation outside that predictable set."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Existing categories, models, products, workflows, or explanations generate predictable but insufficient options.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P012-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"], ["O1", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require a problem whose relevant structure crosses domain boundaries.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The problem spans two or more domains.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must require insufficiency of a single disciplinary frame for the whole problem.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A complete branch is that one discipline cannot solve the problem cleanly.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must require insufficiency of a single operating model for the whole problem.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A complete branch is that one operating model cannot solve the problem cleanly.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "A cross-domain problem exceeds the clean solution capacity of one discipline or one operating model.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "a cross-domain problem cannot be solved cleanly within one governing frame", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P012-C05-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A blend can be created for insight or expression even when one domain could solve the problem.", "slug": "conceptual_blending"}], "residual_id": "r:conceptual_blending_for_innovation:b013_a13_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b013_a13_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A problem crosses domains and cannot be solved cleanly from within one discipline or operating model. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A problem crosses domains and cannot be solved cleanly from within one discipline or operating model."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A blend can be created for insight or expression even when one domain could solve the problem.", "slug": "conceptual_blending"}], "normalized_requirement": "A problem crosses domains and cannot be solved cleanly within one discipline or operating model.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A problem crosses domains and cannot be solved cleanly within one discipline or operating model.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Genuine competence transfer need not begin from an analogy or become misleading through direct copying.", "slug": "transfer_of_learning"}], "residual_id": "r:conceptual_blending_for_innovation:b013_a13_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b013_a13_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A promising analogy, metaphor, borrowed practice, or outside example suggests useful structure, but direct transfer would be too narrow or misleading. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A promising analogy, metaphor, borrowed practice, or outside example suggests useful structure, but direct transfer would be too narrow or misleading."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Genuine competence transfer need not begin from an analogy or become misleading through direct copying.", "slug": "transfer_of_learning"}], "normalized_requirement": "An analogy, metaphor, borrowed practice, or outside example suggests structure while direct transfer would mislead.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "An analogy, metaphor, borrowed practice, or outside example suggests structure while direct transfer would mislead.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Blending can elaborate more than two inputs and does not require a prior false dichotomy.", "slug": "conceptual_blending"}], "residual_id": "r:conceptual_blending_for_innovation:b013_a13_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b013_a13_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Stakeholders are stuck in either-or choices where a hybrid arrangement might create a third option. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders are stuck in either-or choices where a hybrid arrangement might create a third option."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Blending can elaborate more than two inputs and does not require a prior false dichotomy.", "slug": "conceptual_blending"}], "normalized_requirement": "Stakeholders are stuck in an either-or frame although a hybrid third option may exist.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Stakeholders are stuck in an either-or frame although a hybrid third option may exist.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P012-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"], ["O1", "O3"], ["O1", "O4"], ["O1", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include an active solution-search process and its reachable option space.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A current search seeks possible solutions.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must connect inherited terms or concepts to restriction of the searched options.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A complete branch is that inherited vocabulary bounds the solution search.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must connect inherited professional expectations to restriction of the searched options.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A complete branch is that professional norms bound the solution search.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must connect inherited product classifications to restriction of the searched options.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A complete branch is that product categories bound the solution search.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must connect inherited organizational routines to restriction of the searched options.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "A complete branch is that organizational routines bound the solution search.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Inherited conceptual or organizational structures bound the current solution search.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "an inherited frame constrains the current solution search", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P012-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A blend can be generated without an inherited vocabulary or professional-norm constraint.", "slug": "conceptual_blending"}], "residual_id": "r:conceptual_blending_for_innovation:b013_a13_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b013_a13_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Current solution search is bounded by inherited vocabulary, professional norms, product categories, or organizational routines. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Current solution search is bounded by inherited vocabulary, professional norms, product categories, or organizational routines."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Neutral property redescription removes the inherited label and reopens the option space, but that is the exact unlock that terminates rather than preserves functional fixedness.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Functional Fixedness", "one_liner": "The cognitive bias in which encoding an object under its conventional category label crowds out inspection of its raw physical properties, blocking the solver from a non-conventional use the problem needs and the object's properties would permit.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:functional_fixedness", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "functional_fixedness"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "functional_fixedness", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P012-C06-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every exact instance has a current solution search bounded by inherited conventional vocabulary, satisfying the complete O1-plus-O2 branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_GUARDED_EQUIVALENT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "An idiosyncratic familiar trick would not satisfy O3, but it violates the emitted professional-norm binding; with that binding, the exact retrieval block necessarily bounds current search.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Einstellung Effect", "one_liner": "Diagnose a skilled solver's failure on a near-surface variant not as missing knowledge but as retrieval-driven blocking — the first-cued familiar method is retrieved, judged adequate, and halts search before a simpler dominating alternative is ever compared.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:einstellung_effect", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O3"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "familiar_method_is_inherited_professional_norm", "predicate": "the familiar method is an inherited professional norm", "rationale": "The single context guard restricts an anchored candidate role or named branch and does not restate the structural head or add a principal role."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "einstellung_effect"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "the familiar method is an inherited professional norm"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "einstellung_effect", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P012-C06-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact search-blocking spine is complete and one atomic binding selects the inherited-professional-norm branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_GUARDED_EQUIVALENT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Fixation on a visual example would not satisfy O2, but it falls outside the vocabulary guard; preserved exact fixation plus the guard necessarily bounds the current search by inherited terms.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Problem-Solving Fixation", "one_liner": "A familiar representation of a problem, method, or object becomes the first and dominant retrieval path, suppressing alternatives that the solver could otherwise use and producing an avoidable failure that can be relieved by disrupting the representation rather than adding knowledge.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:problem_solving_fixation", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "familiar_representation_is_inherited_vocabulary", "predicate": "the familiar representation is inherited vocabulary", "rationale": "The single context guard restricts an anchored candidate role or named branch and does not restate the structural head or add a principal role."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "problem_solving_fixation"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "the familiar representation is inherited vocabulary"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "problem_solving_fixation", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P012-C06-U1", "why_it_fits": "One atomic subtype binding selects the inherited-vocabulary manifestation of the exact representation-driven search foreclosure."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A cheaply learned personal tool preference would miss O3 but violates the professional-norm guard; the guarded team capability necessarily bounds current tool search.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Golden Hammer Anti-Pattern", "one_liner": "Diagnose a team applying its familiar technology to a poorly-fitting problem because the acquisition cost of an alternative is visible while the misfit cost is diffuse and downstream, so fluency reshapes what counts as the right tool before fit is ever asked.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:golden_hammer_anti_pattern", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O3"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "acquired_capability_is_inherited_professional_norm", "predicate": "the acquired capability is an inherited professional norm", "rationale": "The single context guard restricts an anchored candidate role or named branch and does not restate the structural head or add a principal role."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "golden_hammer_anti_pattern"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "the acquired capability is an inherited professional norm"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "golden_hammer_anti_pattern", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P012-C06-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact inertial-selection spine plus one inherited-professional-norm binding satisfies one complete branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "No exact DSA-plus-qualifier instance can falsify the selected complete branch.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Thought-Terminating Cliché", "one_liner": "A stock verbal formula that closes an open inquiry not by answering it but by exploiting a social uptake norm that treats producing the formula as having discharged the obligation to reply.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:thought_terminating_cliche", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "cliche_solution_search", "predicate": "The open inquiry closed by the stock formula is a current search for solutions.", "rationale": "The single context guard restricts an anchored candidate role or named branch and does not restate the structural head or add a principal role."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "thought_terminating_cliche"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "cliche_solution_search"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "thought_terminating_cliche", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P012-C06-U1", "why_it_fits": "Exact roles and relations satisfy one DNF branch within the qualifier limit."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Inherited vocabulary, professional norms, product categories, or routines bound the current solution search.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The team needs novelty that is still coherent enough to prototype, communicate, govern, or implement.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is appropriate when novelty is necessary but must be disciplined enough for implementation. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: The team needs novelty that is still coherent enough to prototype, communicate, govern, or implement. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The team needs novelty that is still coherent enough to prototype, communicate, govern, or implement.", "It is appropriate when novelty is necessary but must be disciplined enough for implementation."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The team needs novelty that is still coherent enough to prototype, communicate, govern, or implement."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 13, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-013", "ledger_sha256": "5e56b18bf80bce86f74750f754385e0ffb65f7a0b0abe36f7f3a510db93d77e9"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Concurrency Control", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:concurrency_control", "slug": "concurrency_control"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is that useful overlap can become unsafe overlap. Multiple actors may each behave reasonably from their local perspective while collectively producing a wrong state. One team updates a record while another acts on the old version. Two services sell the same inventory. Two maintainers lock different resources and then wait forever for the other resource. Two writers overwrite each other’s edits. A committee tries to amend, vote, and debate at the same time, leaving no one sure what decision was actually made.\n\nThe shared surface may be obvious, such as a database record or a physical machine. It may also be hidden, such as customer trust, approval authority, budget availability, downstream capacity, or the meaning of a shared artifact. Hidden shared state is why concurrency failures often surprise people: the actors thought they were working independently, but their actions met downstream.\n\nThe underlying tension is speed versus integrity. Parallelism improves responsiveness and throughput, but the contested part of the system needs a rule strong enough to preserve correctness, safety, fairness, and accountability.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Simultaneous actors, processes, teams, or workflows can interfere with one another while accessing shared resources or changing shared state. Without coordination, outcomes depend on accidental timing, duplicate work, hidden overwrites, resource overcommitment, inconsistent decisions, or mutual blocking."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires multiple simultaneous independent or interdependent processes.", "role_mapping": "Processes -> actors/workflows; simultaneous execution -> concurrent activity.", "slug": "concurrency", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime requires two or more concurrent agents acting on shared state.", "role_mapping": "Concurrent agents -> simultaneous activities; critical region -> overlapping action.", "slug": "race_condition", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b013_a14_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Simultaneous activity exists. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["simultaneous_activity_exists"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Concurrency", "one_liner": "Manage simultaneous processes.", "page_ref": "prime:concurrency", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Processes -> actors/workflows; simultaneous execution -> concurrent activity.", "slug": "concurrency", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires multiple simultaneous independent or interdependent processes."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Race Condition", "one_liner": "The outcome of a system depends on the uncontrolled relative timing of concurrent actions on shared state, so the order effects land — not the actions — determines the result.", "page_ref": "prime:race_condition", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Concurrent agents -> simultaneous activities; critical region -> overlapping action.", "slug": "race_condition", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires two or more concurrent agents acting on shared state."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Multiple processes or actors are active simultaneously.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires concurrent access to a shared state through a non-atomic critical region.", "role_mapping": "Shared state -> common target; conflict -> interleaving access.", "slug": "race_condition", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime requires exclusive resources held by parties that each wait for another resource in the cycle.", "role_mapping": "Held resources -> shared resource set; mutual exclusion -> conflicting access.", "slug": "deadlock", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b013_a14_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Shared resource or state exists. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["shared_resource_or_state_exists"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Race Condition", "one_liner": "The outcome of a system depends on the uncontrolled relative timing of concurrent actions on shared state, so the order effects land — not the actions — determines the result.", "page_ref": "prime:race_condition", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Shared state -> common target; conflict -> interleaving access.", "slug": "race_condition", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires concurrent access to a shared state through a non-atomic critical region."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Deadlock", "one_liner": "Mutual blocking processes.", "page_ref": "prime:deadlock", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Held resources -> shared resource set; mutual exclusion -> conflicting access.", "slug": "deadlock", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires exclusive resources held by parties that each wait for another resource in the cycle."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Concurrent activities share a resource or state whose access can conflict.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's load-bearing invariant is that uncontrolled relative order, not the action contents, determines the outcome.", "role_mapping": "Interleaving -> relative timing; changed result -> order dependence.", "slug": "race_condition", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b013_a14_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Interleaving affects outcome. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["interleaving_affects_outcome"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Race Condition", "one_liner": "The outcome of a system depends on the uncontrolled relative timing of concurrent actions on shared state, so the order effects land — not the actions — determines the result.", "page_ref": "prime:race_condition", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Interleaving -> relative timing; changed result -> order dependence.", "slug": "race_condition", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's load-bearing invariant is that uncontrolled relative order, not the action contents, determines the outcome."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Uncontrolled interleaving of concurrent actions changes the result.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Conflict cost is material.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source states: Conflict cost is material. The normalized contextual consideration is: Conflict cost is material. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["conflict_cost_is_material"]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "conflict_cost_is_material"}, {"display_text": "Coordination rule can be enforced.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source states: Coordination rule can be enforced. The normalized feasibility condition is: Coordination rule can be enforced. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["coordination_rule_can_be_enforced"]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "coordination_rule_can_be_enforced"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 13, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-013", "ledger_sha256": "5e56b18bf80bce86f74750f754385e0ffb65f7a0b0abe36f7f3a510db93d77e9"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Concurrent Cross-Functional Integration", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:concurrent_cross_functional_integration", "slug": "concurrent_cross_functional_integration"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 3, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 7 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 7}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Functional specialization creates depth but also boundaries. A design group optimizes performance, operations optimizes reliability, procurement optimizes availability and cost, legal manages exposure, safety controls hazard, and users experience the combined service. When each function works against a local artifact and schedule, the outcome does not exist until late recombination.\n\nSequential handoffs appear orderly but turn feedback into rework. Downstream knowledge arrives after contracts, tooling, architecture, schedules, public promises, and professional identities harden. The cost of change encourages exceptions and workarounds rather than correction.\n\nNaive parallelism makes this worse. Several functions advance simultaneously on different assumptions and versions. Local progress increases while integration debt grows. A late merge reveals interface conflict, resource contention, incompatible tolerances, missing ownership, and contradictory success criteria.\n\nNominal cross-functionality can conceal silo behavior. Representatives attend a shared meeting but lack authority to decide, time to do integration work, or a shared outcome. They report status upward and return to local priorities. One boundary spanner becomes the translation bottleneck.\n\nShared resources create a second constraint. Test environments, reviewers, domain experts, decision-makers, labs, data, facilities, or integration builds have limited capacity. Unlimited parallel work queues before them and converts speed into waiting.\n\nThe structural response is to design the team, work partition, interfaces, shared state, authority, cadence, capacity, and tests as one operating system. The goal is end-to-end flow and learning, not maximum local utilization.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Specialized functions work sequentially or in parallel isolation. Requirements, constraints, risks, assumptions, and changes remain local. Handoffs use documents or meetings that lag the actual work. Interfaces are implicit, ownership overlaps or gaps, shared resources become bottlenecks, and a decision by one function invalidates another's work without prompt notice. Integration occurs late, when commitments, tooling, contracts, schedules, and identities make change expensive. A cross-functional team may exist nominally yet still operate as colocated silos."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P012-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include distinct upstream and downstream functions linked by a dependency on an upstream choice.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An upstream function makes a choice on which downstream work depends.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve late discovery after consequential downstream progress, not immediate review.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The downstream function discovers the defect only after dependent work or commitments have advanced.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require recurrence across choices or cycles rather than one isolated discovery.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The late downstream discovery occurs repeatedly.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must require practical infeasibility of the upstream choice for the dependent function.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A complete branch is that the upstream choice is infeasible for downstream execution.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must require a safety defect in the upstream choice as encountered downstream.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "A complete branch is that the upstream choice is unsafe for downstream execution.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Downstream functions repeatedly discover late that upstream choices are infeasible or unsafe.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "downstream functions repeatedly discover upstream infeasibility or unsafety after dependent work advances", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P012-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A deliberate postponement boundary does not require repeated late discovery of infeasibility.", "slug": "decoupling_point"}], "residual_id": "r:concurrent_cross_functional_integration:b013_a15_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b013_a15_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: downstream functions repeatedly discover infeasible or unsafe upstream choices late. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["downstream functions repeatedly discover infeasible or unsafe upstream choices late"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_GUARDED_EQUIVALENT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A one-cycle disconnect would falsify O3 but violates the recurrence guard; with recurrence fixed, exact incompatible plans necessarily produce the late infeasibility branch.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "S&OP Disconnect", "one_liner": "Diagnose a firm's downstream execution crises as an upstream planning defect — separate functions each holding an internally sound but mutually incompatible plan for the same future, because no binding forum reconciles them before commitments are taken.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:s_op_disconnect", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O3"], "guard_type": "QUANTIFIER_BINDING", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "late_discovery_recurs_across_planning_cycles", "predicate": "the late execution-layer discovery recurs across planning cycles", "rationale": "The single context guard restricts an anchored candidate role or named branch and does not restate the structural head or add a principal role."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "s_op_disconnect"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "the late execution-layer discovery recurs across planning cycles"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "s_op_disconnect", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P012-C07-U1", "why_it_fits": "One recurrence binding closes the sole quantifier gap in the exact upstream-plan to downstream-infeasibility spine."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Immediate pre-execution detection would falsify O2 but violates the timing guard; guarded exact instances retain recurring downstream infeasibility after work advances.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Plan-Execute Gap", "one_liner": "The pathology in which a coarse-grained planning artefact cannot be enacted because the execution layer faces binding fine-grained constraints the planning model never represented — so the fix is constraint propagation and feedback, never a better forecast.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:plan_execute_gap", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2"], "guard_type": "TIMING_BINDING", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "dependent_work_advanced_before_infeasibility_discovery", "predicate": "dependent execution work has advanced before infeasibility is discovered", "rationale": "The single context guard restricts an anchored candidate role or named branch and does not restate the structural head or add a principal role."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "plan_execute_gap"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "dependent execution work has advanced before infeasibility is discovered"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "plan_execute_gap", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P012-C07-U1", "why_it_fits": "One atomic timing binding closes the only missing obligation in the exact recurrent plan-infeasibility spine."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Downstream functions repeatedly discover infeasible or unsafe upstream choices after dependent commitments advance.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires pooled, sequential, reciprocal, or team dependencies grounded in information, artifacts, approvals, resources, or complementary skills.", "role_mapping": "Specialist functions -> tasks; interacting constraints -> dependency basis.", "slug": "task_interdependence", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b013_a15_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: design, engineering, operations, safety, user, legal, procurement, or implementation constraints interact strongly. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["design, engineering, operations, safety, user, legal, procurement, or implementation constraints interact strongly"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Task Interdependence", "one_liner": "Tasks rely on each other.", "page_ref": "prime:task_interdependence", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Specialist functions -> tasks; interacting constraints -> dependency basis.", "slug": "task_interdependence", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires pooled, sequential, reciprocal, or team dependencies grounded in information, artifacts, approvals, resources, or complementary skills."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Technical, operational, legal, safety, user, procurement, or implementation tasks have strong information, artifact, approval, or resource dependencies.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P012-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require recurring coordination meetings rather than a single meeting.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Teams conduct many or frequent coordination meetings.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve persistence of defects at cross-functional interfaces.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Interface defects continue to occur.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve persistent repeated work caused by unresolved coordination problems.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Rework continues to occur.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must relate the ongoing meetings to simultaneous continued failure without requiring that meetings cause the failure.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The interface defects and rework persist while the frequent meetings continue.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Teams hold frequent coordination meetings while interface defects and rework persist.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "frequent coordination meetings coexist with persistent interface defects and rework", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P012-C08-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Effective collaboration can eliminate interface defects and does not entail meeting-heavy failure.", "slug": "concurrent_cross_functional_collaboration"}], "residual_id": "r:concurrent_cross_functional_integration:b013_a15_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b013_a15_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: teams conduct many coordination meetings while interface defects and rework continue. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["teams conduct many coordination meetings while interface defects and rework continue"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Effective collaboration can eliminate interface defects and does not entail meeting-heavy failure.", "slug": "concurrent_cross_functional_collaboration"}], "normalized_requirement": "Coordination meetings remain frequent while interface defects and rework persist.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Coordination meetings remain frequent while interface defects and rework persist.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Parallel execution can be interleaving-safe and need not create merge or release failures.", "slug": "concurrency"}], "residual_id": "r:concurrent_cross_functional_integration:b013_a15_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b013_a15_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: parallel work accelerates local output but increases merge, integration, or release failure. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["parallel work accelerates local output but increases merge, integration, or release failure"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Parallel execution can be interleaving-safe and need not create merge or release failures.", "slug": "concurrency"}], "normalized_requirement": "Parallel work raises local output while increasing merge, integration, or release failure.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Parallel work raises local output while increasing merge, integration, or release failure.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P012-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include distinct functions and tradeoffs produced across their interacting choices.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A system contains multiple specialist functions whose choices create tradeoffs.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require cross-functional system scope for the tradeoff responsibility.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The tradeoffs span the functions end to end rather than belonging wholly to one function.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail absence of an accountable role for resolving the system-spanning tradeoffs.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "No person or role owns the end-to-end tradeoffs.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "No role owns end-to-end tradeoffs across specialist functions.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "cross-functional tradeoffs lack an end-to-end owner", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P012-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Parallel vertical stacks can still have an overall owner; the prime requires architectural duplication and absent horizontal layers instead.", "slug": "stovepipe_system"}], "residual_id": "r:concurrent_cross_functional_integration:b013_a15_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b013_a15_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: no one owns end-to-end tradeoffs across functions. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["no one owns end-to-end tradeoffs across functions"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Parallel vertical stacks can still have an overall owner; the prime requires architectural duplication and absent horizontal layers instead.", "slug": "stovepipe_system"}], "normalized_requirement": "No role owns end-to-end tradeoffs across specialist functions.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "No role owns end-to-end tradeoffs across specialist functions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P012-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"], ["O1", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include a cross-functional artifact serving more than one functional stack.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Multiple functions depend on an artifact intended to be shared.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must require incompatible or inconsistent versions rather than ordinary revision history.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A complete branch is that conflicting versions of the shared artifact coexist.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must require unofficial local copies separated from the shared authoritative artifact.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A complete branch is that functions maintain local shadow copies of the shared artifact.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "A cross-functional shared artifact exists as conflicting versions or local shadow copies.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "a shared artifact fragments into conflicting functional versions", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P012-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A stovepipe duplicates some shared concern inside vertical stacks, but that concern need not be an artifact with conflicting versions or shadow copies.", "slug": "stovepipe_system"}], "residual_id": "r:concurrent_cross_functional_integration:b013_a15_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b013_a15_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: shared artifacts have conflicting versions or local shadow copies. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["shared artifacts have conflicting versions or local shadow copies"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_GUARDED_EQUIVALENT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Two personal branches would miss O1 but violate the functional-maintainer guard; guarded exact conflicts necessarily contain cross-functional conflicting versions of one shared artifact.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Merge Conflict", "one_liner": "Halt an automatic merge and hand the decision to a human exactly where two branches diverged from their common ancestor on the same region, because a three-way merge over text can rank a one-sided edit but has no syntactic basis to choose between two competing edits whose correctness lives in intent it cannot see.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:merge_conflict", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "branches_maintained_by_distinct_functions", "predicate": "the divergent branches are maintained by distinct organizational functions", "rationale": "The single context guard restricts an anchored candidate role or named branch and does not restate the structural head or add a principal role."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "merge_conflict"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "the divergent branches are maintained by distinct organizational functions"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "merge_conflict", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P012-C10-U1", "why_it_fits": "One organizational-function binding turns the exact shared-artifact divergence into the required cross-functional conflict branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_GUARDED_EQUIVALENT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A stale but unified picture would falsify O2 but violates the emitted fragmentation guard; guarded exact instances necessarily contain conflicting functional versions.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Common-Operating-Picture Breakdown", "one_liner": "The failure mode where a multi-party response acts incoherently because its engineered shared picture fails to synthesise participants' partial views — relocating the fault from the responders to the artefact, whose currency, completeness, and consistency become the lever.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:common_operating_picture_breakdown", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "shared_picture_fragments_into_conflicting_versions", "predicate": "the shared-picture failure is fragmentation into conflicting per-function versions", "rationale": "The single context guard restricts an anchored candidate role or named branch and does not restate the structural head or add a principal role."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "common_operating_picture_breakdown"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "the shared-picture failure is fragmentation into conflicting per-function versions"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "common_operating_picture_breakdown", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P012-C10-U1", "why_it_fits": "One named failure-mode selection closes the conflicting-version branch over the exact engineered shared artifact."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Shared artifacts exist as conflicting versions or local shadow copies inside parallel functional stacks.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P012-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include a dependency relation between the propagated change and the receiving work, without requiring any additional realized consequence.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Work receiving the change depends on that change.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require an informal interpersonal or unofficial path carrying the change.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The change propagates through an informal network.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve work-advancement-before-change-arrival ordering.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The dependent work advances before the change reaches it.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "A change propagates through an informal network after work depending on that change has advanced.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "an informal network propagates a change after dependent work advances", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P012-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Uneven adaptation rates do not require an informal change-notification path or dependent rework.", "slug": "culture_lag"}], "residual_id": "r:concurrent_cross_functional_integration:b013_a15_c7", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b013_a15_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: changes propagate through informal networks after dependent work has advanced. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["changes propagate through informal networks after dependent work has advanced"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_GUARDED_EQUIVALENT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A formally routed amendment would falsify O2 but violates the informal-path guard; guarded exact churn necessarily reaches dependent work after that work has already advanced on a stale specification.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Requirements Churn", "one_liner": "A project pathology in which the specification changes faster than the execution organization can absorb it — a control-theoretic case where the reference signal outruns the controller's bandwidth, so no spec lives long enough for work to consolidate against it.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:requirements_churn", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "specification_change_propagates_informally", "predicate": "the specification change propagates through an informal interpersonal network", "rationale": "The single context guard restricts an anchored candidate role or named branch and does not restate the structural head or add a principal role."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "requirements_churn"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "the specification change propagates through an informal interpersonal network"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "requirements_churn", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P012-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "One propagation-path binding closes the sole gap in the exact late-arriving change and dependent-work relation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Changes travel through informal networks only after dependent work has advanced.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "a complex outcome requires simultaneous learning across technical, social, operational, and governance dimensions.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: a complex outcome requires simultaneous learning across technical, social, operational, and governance dimensions. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["a complex outcome requires simultaneous learning across technical, social, operational, and governance dimensions"]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 8, "text": "a complex outcome requires simultaneous learning across technical, social, operational, and governance dimensions"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 13, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-013", "ledger_sha256": "5e56b18bf80bce86f74750f754385e0ffb65f7a0b0abe36f7f3a510db93d77e9"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Conditional Authority Envelope Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:conditional_authority_envelope_design", "slug": "conditional_authority_envelope_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system needs actors to respond faster than central approval can move, but unrestricted discretion would create inconsistency, illegitimacy, excessive force, unsafe action, or accountability failure. The missing structure is a pre-committed rule envelope that authorizes local action while preserving boundaries.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system needs actors to respond faster than central approval can move, but unrestricted discretion would create inconsistency, illegitimacy, excessive force, unsafe action, or accountability failure. The missing structure is a pre-committed rule envelope that authorizes local action while preserving boundaries."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires standing scope-based authority at operational levels because case-by-case central approval cannot cover contingencies in time.", "role_mapping": "Delegated agent -> operator; contingency -> changing condition; standing authority -> action before approval.", "slug": "authority_delegation_under_uncertainty", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b014_a01_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Operators, agents, responders, supervisors, or automated systems must act when conditions change before a central authority can decide each case. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Operators, agents, responders, supervisors, or automated systems must act when conditions change before a central authority can decide each case."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Authority Delegation Under Uncertainty", "one_liner": "Preposition decision authority at operational levels for contingencies.", "page_ref": "prime:authority_delegation_under_uncertainty", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Delegated agent -> operator; contingency -> changing condition; standing authority -> action before approval.", "slug": "authority_delegation_under_uncertainty", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires standing scope-based authority at operational levels because case-by-case central approval cannot cover contingencies in time."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Operational actors must respond to changing conditions before central authority can decide each case.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires pre-positioned decision scope, trusted discretion within bounds, and audit after action.", "role_mapping": "Operational discretion -> autonomy; defined scope and audit -> institutional constraints.", "slug": "authority_delegation_under_uncertainty", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b014_a01_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Actors need autonomy, but the institution must preserve legal, ethical, safety, legitimacy, or accountability constraints. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Actors need autonomy, but the institution must preserve legal, ethical, safety, legitimacy, or accountability constraints."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Authority Delegation Under Uncertainty", "one_liner": "Preposition decision authority at operational levels for contingencies.", "page_ref": "prime:authority_delegation_under_uncertainty", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Operational discretion -> autonomy; defined scope and audit -> institutional constraints.", "slug": "authority_delegation_under_uncertainty", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires pre-positioned decision scope, trusted discretion within bounds, and audit after action."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Actors require local autonomy within preserved legal, ethical, safety, legitimacy, and accountability boundaries.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P012-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require unclear permission or authority boundaries for a relevant action.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Actors face ambiguity about what action is permitted.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must connect the response to unclear authority rather than merely co-occurring with it.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The permission ambiguity causes the selected response.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must entail paralysis caused by the permission ambiguity.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A complete branch is that actors become unable or unwilling to act.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must entail unnecessary or excessive escalation caused by the permission ambiguity.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A complete branch is that actors escalate beyond what the situation requires.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must entail locally invented action outside established authorization.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "A complete branch is that actors improvise without authorization.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Ambiguous action permission causes paralysis, over-escalation, or unauthorized improvisation.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "ambiguous authority produces one of three maladaptive action responses", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P012-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A functioning delegation envelope declares scope and does not require permission ambiguity.", "slug": "authority_delegation_under_uncertainty"}], "residual_id": "r:conditional_authority_envelope_design:b014_a01_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b014_a01_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Ambiguity about what is allowed creates either paralysis, over-escalation, or unauthorized improvisation. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Ambiguity about what is allowed creates either paralysis, over-escalation, or unauthorized improvisation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_GUARDED_EQUIVALENT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "An over-acting-only instance would not satisfy O3 but violates the paralysis branch guard; guarded exact instances necessarily satisfy the complete paralysis branch.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Rules-of-Engagement Ambiguity", "one_liner": "Diagnose frontline breakdown under time pressure as a grain mismatch — decision rules written coarser than the environment generates choice points — paid out of a finite discretion budget, relocating the fix from the operator's judgment to the rule, escalation path, and pre-positioned authority.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:rules_of_engagement_ambiguity", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O3"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "ambiguity_response_is_actor_paralysis", "predicate": "the ambiguity-induced behavioral response is actor paralysis", "rationale": "The single context guard restricts an anchored candidate role or named branch and does not restate the structural head or add a principal role."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "rules_of_engagement_ambiguity"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "the ambiguity-induced behavioral response is actor paralysis"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "rules_of_engagement_ambiguity", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P012-C12-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact ambiguity-to-fragmentation spine plus one named response-branch selection satisfies a complete DNF branch."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Ambiguous permission creates paralysis, unnecessary escalation, or unauthorized improvisation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A proportional response can be assessed without a simultaneous omission-versus-excess authority dilemma.", "slug": "proportionality"}], "residual_id": "r:conditional_authority_envelope_design:b014_a01_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b014_a01_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A failure to act and an excessive action are both plausible harms. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A failure to act and an excessive action are both plausible harms."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A proportional response can be assessed without a simultaneous omission-versus-excess authority dilemma.", "slug": "proportionality"}], "normalized_requirement": "Failure to act and excessive action are both plausible harms.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Failure to act and excessive action are both plausible harms.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The organization can describe recurring conditions, risk tiers, or thresholds in advance.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: The organization can describe recurring conditions, risk tiers, or thresholds in advance. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The organization can describe recurring conditions, risk tiers, or thresholds in advance."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "The organization can describe recurring conditions, risk tiers, or thresholds in advance."}, {"display_text": "After-action review is possible even when pre-action approval is not.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system needs actors to respond faster than central approval can move, but unrestricted discretion would create inconsistency, illegitimacy, excessive force, unsafe action, or accountability failure. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: After-action review is possible even when pre-action approval is not. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["After-action review is possible even when pre-action approval is not.", "A system needs actors to respond faster than central approval can move, but unrestricted discretion would create inconsistency, illegitimacy, excessive force, unsafe action, or accountability failure."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "After-action review is possible even when pre-action approval is not."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 14, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-014", "ledger_sha256": "afcbe7f8d1296dc9682196060fa10f97ca465fd762e770f71066b732b13c3098"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Conditional Independence Boundary Mapping", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:conditional_independence_boundary_mapping", "slug": "conditional_independence_boundary_mapping"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A target is embedded in a large dependency field, and the system either over-models everything, under-specifies the relevant interface, or mistakes ordinary scope boundaries for statistically sufficient boundaries. The result is bloated monitoring, unstable prediction, hidden confounding, misleading feature sets, privacy over-collection, or control decisions that ignore the actual variables through which the target and environment interact.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A target is embedded in a large dependency field, and the system either over-models everything, under-specifies the relevant interface, or mistakes ordinary scope boundaries for statistically sufficient boundaries. The result is bloated monitoring, unstable prediction, hidden confounding, misleading feature sets, privacy over-collection, or control decisions that ignore the actual variables through which the target and environment interact."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A Markov blanket defines a statistical interface but does not require a current prediction or control project.", "slug": "markov_blanket"}], "residual_id": "r:conditional_independence_boundary_mapping:b014_a02_c1", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b014_a02_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The result is bloated monitoring, unstable prediction, hidden confounding, misleading feature sets, privacy over-collection, or control decisions that ignore the actual variables through which the target and environment interact. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A focal variable, subsystem, decision, patient state, asset, behavior, risk, or model output must be predicted, explained, monitored, or controlled.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A focal variable, subsystem, decision, patient state, asset, behavior, risk, or model output must be predicted, explained, monitored, or controlled.", "The result is bloated monitoring, unstable prediction, hidden confounding, misleading feature sets, privacy over-collection, or control decisions that ignore the actual variables through which the target and environment interact."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A Markov blanket defines a statistical interface but does not require a current prediction or control project.", "slug": "markov_blanket"}], "normalized_requirement": "A focal variable, subsystem, decision, patient state, asset, behavior, risk, or model output must be predicted, explained, monitored, or controlled.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A focal variable, subsystem, decision, patient state, asset, behavior, risk, or model output must be predicted, explained, monitored, or controlled.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A Markov blanket can have a small exterior and identifies a sufficient screening interface rather than requiring many merely plausible variables.", "slug": "markov_blanket"}], "residual_id": "r:conditional_independence_boundary_mapping:b014_a02_c2", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b014_a02_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The system needs enough variables to preserve the target-relevant dependency structure, but not so many that the boundary becomes the whole environment. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Many surrounding variables are plausible influences, proxies, descendants, causes, measurements, or contextual correlates.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Many surrounding variables are plausible influences, proxies, descendants, causes, measurements, or contextual correlates.", "The system needs enough variables to preserve the target-relevant dependency structure, but not so many that the boundary becomes the whole environment."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A Markov blanket can have a small exterior and identifies a sufficient screening interface rather than requiring many merely plausible variables.", "slug": "markov_blanket"}], "normalized_requirement": "Many surrounding variables are plausible influences, proxies, descendants, causes, measurements, or contextual correlates.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Many surrounding variables are plausible influences, proxies, descendants, causes, measurements, or contextual correlates.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P012-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O5"], ["O2", "O5"], ["O3", "O5"], ["O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must include an existing boundary defined by administrative scope.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A complete branch is that an administrative boundary separates system regions or actors.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must include an existing spatial or physical boundary.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A complete branch is that a physical boundary separates system regions or actors.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must include an existing boundary between meanings, schemas, or interpretive regimes.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A complete branch is that a semantic boundary separates system regions or actors.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the candidate must include an existing boundary between organizational units or roles.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A complete branch is that an organizational boundary separates system regions or actors.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require absence of a specification for the content or variables communicated across the boundary.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The boundary does not state what information crosses it.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "An existing administrative, physical, semantic, or organizational boundary lacks a specification of what information crosses it.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "an existing system boundary omits its information-crossing semantics", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P012-C13-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A declared segmentation can explicitly document boundary traffic and need not omit information semantics.", "slug": "segmentation_and_boundary_drawing"}], "residual_id": "r:conditional_independence_boundary_mapping:b014_a02_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b014_a02_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Existing boundaries are administrative, physical, semantic, or organizational but do not state what information crosses them. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Existing boundaries are administrative, physical, semantic, or organizational but do not state what information crosses them."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A declared segmentation can explicitly document boundary traffic and need not omit information semantics.", "slug": "segmentation_and_boundary_drawing"}], "normalized_requirement": "Administrative, physical, semantic, or organizational boundaries do not state what information crosses them.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Administrative, physical, semantic, or organizational boundaries do not state what information crosses them.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "Conditioning on a minimal boundary must render the focal target independent of the remaining exterior variables.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Conditioning on a minimal boundary must render the focal target independent of the remaining exterior variables.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The team needs a smaller interface than the full environment, but a stronger justification than convenience-based feature selection or informal scoping.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The result is bloated monitoring, unstable prediction, hidden confounding, misleading feature sets, privacy over-collection, or control decisions that ignore the actual variables through which the target and environment interact. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: The team needs a smaller interface than the full environment, but a stronger justification than convenience-based feature selection or informal scoping. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The team needs a smaller interface than the full environment, but a stronger justification than convenience-based feature selection or informal scoping.", "The result is bloated monitoring, unstable prediction, hidden confounding, misleading feature sets, privacy over-collection, or control decisions that ignore the actual variables through which the target and environment interact."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "The team needs a smaller interface than the full environment, but a stronger justification than convenience-based feature selection or informal scoping."}, {"display_text": "Conditional probability, graphical structure, causal reasoning, or statistical testing can be used to judge whether outside variables add information after the candidate boundary is observed.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The system needs enough variables to preserve the target-relevant dependency structure, but not so many that the boundary becomes the whole environment. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: Conditional probability, graphical structure, causal reasoning, or statistical testing can be used to judge whether outside variables add information after the candidate boundary is observed. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Conditional probability, graphical structure, causal reasoning, or statistical testing can be used to judge whether outside variables add information after the candidate boundary is observed.", "The system needs enough variables to preserve the target-relevant dependency structure, but not so many that the boundary becomes the whole environment."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Conditional probability, graphical structure, causal reasoning, or statistical testing can be used to judge whether outside variables add information after the candidate boundary is observed."}, {"display_text": "Collecting, monitoring, storing, or acting on every possible variable is costly, intrusive, noisy, or operationally impossible.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The result is bloated monitoring, unstable prediction, hidden confounding, misleading feature sets, privacy over-collection, or control decisions that ignore the actual variables through which the target and environment interact. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Collecting, monitoring, storing, or acting on every possible variable is costly, intrusive, noisy, or operationally impossible. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Collecting, monitoring, storing, or acting on every possible variable is costly, intrusive, noisy, or operationally impossible.", "The result is bloated monitoring, unstable prediction, hidden confounding, misleading feature sets, privacy over-collection, or control decisions that ignore the actual variables through which the target and environment interact."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Collecting, monitoring, storing, or acting on every possible variable is costly, intrusive, noisy, or operationally impossible."}, {"display_text": "The model or organization needs to know which variables must be observed continuously and which can be ignored until the boundary drifts.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The system needs enough variables to preserve the target-relevant dependency structure, but not so many that the boundary becomes the whole environment. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: The model or organization needs to know which variables must be observed continuously and which can be ignored until the boundary drifts. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The model or organization needs to know which variables must be observed continuously and which can be ignored until the boundary drifts.", "The system needs enough variables to preserve the target-relevant dependency structure, but not so many that the boundary becomes the whole environment."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "The model or organization needs to know which variables must be observed continuously and which can be ignored until the boundary drifts."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 14, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-014", "ledger_sha256": "afcbe7f8d1296dc9682196060fa10f97ca465fd762e770f71066b732b13c3098"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Conditioned Probability Frame Specification", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:conditioned_probability_frame_specification", "slug": "conditioned_probability_frame_specification"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Probability claims are made, compared, or used in decisions without declaring what information, subgroup, scenario, evidence state, or assumption set is being taken as given. The missing conditioning frame lets actors mix marginal and conditional probabilities, compare rates with different denominators, ignore base rates, reuse numbers outside their valid context, or treat an updated probability as if it were unconditional. The arithmetic may be correct inside one frame while the conclusion is wrong because the frame has silently changed.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Probability claims are made, compared, or used in decisions without declaring what information, subgroup, scenario, evidence state, or assumption set is being taken as given. The missing conditioning frame lets actors mix marginal and conditional probabilities, compare rates with different denominators, ignore base rates, reuse numbers outside their valid context, or treat an updated probability as if it were unconditional. The arithmetic may be correct inside one frame while the conclusion is wrong because the frame has silently changed."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a sample space, event structure, and probability measure quantifying uncertainty over outcomes.", "role_mapping": "Probability measure -> estimate; event -> stated outcome.", "slug": "probability", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime begins with a probability measure and states a probability relative to information taken as given.", "role_mapping": "Conditional measure -> probability estimate; event -> claimed likelihood.", "slug": "conditional_probability", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b014_a03_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A probability, risk, prevalence, rate, likelihood, forecast, or uncertainty estimate is being stated or compared. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A probability, risk, prevalence, rate, likelihood, forecast, or uncertainty estimate is being stated or compared."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Probability", "one_liner": "Quantifies uncertainty and likelihoods.", "page_ref": "prime:probability", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Probability measure -> estimate; event -> stated outcome.", "slug": "probability", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a sample space, event structure, and probability measure quantifying uncertainty over outcomes."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Conditional Probability", "one_liner": "Re-normalize a probability measure to the information context that is taken as given.", "page_ref": "prime:conditional_probability", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Conditional measure -> probability estimate; event -> claimed likelihood.", "slug": "conditional_probability", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime begins with a probability measure and states a probability relative to information taken as given."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A probability, risk, prevalence, rate, likelihood, forecast, or uncertainty estimate is stated or compared.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a conditioning event that restricts and re-normalizes the outcome space to information taken as given.", "role_mapping": "Conditioning event -> evidence/subgroup/scenario; restricted universe -> estimate context.", "slug": "conditional_probability", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b014_a03_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The estimate depends on evidence already observed, a subgroup membership, a scenario assumption, a diagnostic signal, a sampling process, or a case-selection rule. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The estimate depends on evidence already observed, a subgroup membership, a scenario assumption, a diagnostic signal, a sampling process, or a case-selection rule."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Conditional Probability", "one_liner": "Re-normalize a probability measure to the information context that is taken as given.", "page_ref": "prime:conditional_probability", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Conditioning event -> evidence/subgroup/scenario; restricted universe -> estimate context.", "slug": "conditional_probability", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a conditioning event that restricts and re-normalizes the outcome space to information taken as given."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The estimate depends on observed evidence, subgroup membership, a scenario, signal, sampling process, or selection rule.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P012-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include decision-relevant probability quantities that differ by conditioning, direction, evidence state, or aggregation.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Decision-makers encounter or use two or more probability quantities defined under different frames.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a material distinction among the probability frames rather than mere notational variation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The probability quantities are not semantically interchangeable.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve possibility of confusion and must not strengthen it to necessary or already-realized confusion.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The decision-makers may confuse the distinct probability quantities.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must relate the distinct quantities through misidentification or substitution in decision use.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The possible confusion treats one probability frame, direction, or evidence state as another.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Decision-makers may confuse distinct marginal, joint, conditional, inverse-conditional, or posterior probability frames.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "decision-makers may treat distinct probability frames as interchangeable", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P012-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A correctly specified conditional probability preserves direction and context and does not require confusion.", "slug": "conditional_probability"}], "residual_id": "r:conditioned_probability_frame_specification:b014_a03_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b014_a03_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Decision-makers might confuse P(A), P(A | B), P(B | A), joint probability, marginal probability, or posterior probability. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Decision-makers might confuse P(A), P(A | B), P(B | A), joint probability, marginal probability, or posterior probability."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A correctly specified conditional probability preserves direction and context and does not require confusion.", "slug": "conditional_probability"}], "normalized_requirement": "Decision-makers may confuse marginal, joint, posterior, forward-conditional, and inverse-conditional probabilities.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Decision-makers may confuse marginal, joint, posterior, forward-conditional, and inverse-conditional probabilities.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A probability measure can describe one fixed context with no cross-frame comparison.", "slug": "probability"}], "residual_id": "r:conditioned_probability_frame_specification:b014_a03_c5", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b014_a03_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Multiple probability claims are being compared across groups, models, time periods, jurisdictions, experiments, or data slices. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Multiple probability claims are being compared across groups, models, time periods, jurisdictions, experiments, or data slices."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A probability measure can describe one fixed context with no cross-frame comparison.", "slug": "probability"}], "normalized_requirement": "Probability claims are compared across groups, models, periods, jurisdictions, experiments, or data slices.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Probability claims are compared across groups, models, periods, jurisdictions, experiments, or data slices.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A low base rate can make positive predictive value low without the visible population or denominator being hidden.", "slug": "false_positive_paradox"}], "residual_id": "r:conditioned_probability_frame_specification:b014_a03_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b014_a03_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The denominator population is smaller than the visible population, or the relevant context excludes some cases. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The denominator population is smaller than the visible population, or the relevant context excludes some cases."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A low base rate can make positive predictive value low without the visible population or denominator being hidden.", "slug": "false_positive_paradox"}], "normalized_requirement": "The relevant denominator is a context-defined subset of the visible population.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The relevant denominator is a context-defined subset of the visible population.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P013-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include a decision-relevant prior and evidence rather than a context-free descriptive rate.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A decision uses a prior probability and a body of evidence.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must connect the evidential update question to the decision outcome.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The decision depends on whether the evidence should update the prior probability.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern an evidence conditioning frame, assumption set, scenario, or strict contextual subtype.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The missing role is the context that specifies how the evidence is conditioned or interpreted.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require absence of the declared context rather than a fully specified Bayesian update.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The evidence conditioning context has not been stated.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "A decision depends on whether evidence should update a prior probability, but the evidence context is unstated.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An evidence-dependent prior update guides a decision without a stated conditioning context.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P013-C01-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid Bayesian update explicitly combines prior and likelihood and need not omit evidence context.", "slug": "bayesian_updating"}], "residual_id": "r:conditioned_probability_frame_specification:b014_a03_c7", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b014_a03_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A decision depends on whether evidence should change a prior probability, but the evidence context has not been stated. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A decision depends on whether evidence should change a prior probability, but the evidence context has not been stated."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid Bayesian update explicitly combines prior and likelihood and need not omit evidence context.", "slug": "bayesian_updating"}], "normalized_requirement": "A decision depends on whether evidence should update a prior, but the evidence context is unstated.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A decision depends on whether evidence should update a prior, but the evidence context is unstated.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A probability will be reused downstream by people who may not know the reference population, information state, or assumptions used to produce it.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Probability claims are made, compared, or used in decisions without declaring what information, subgroup, scenario, evidence state, or assumption set is being taken as given. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: A probability will be reused downstream by people who may not know the reference population, information state, or assumptions used to produce it. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A probability will be reused downstream by people who may not know the reference population, information state, or assumptions used to produce it.", "Probability claims are made, compared, or used in decisions without declaring what information, subgroup, scenario, evidence state, or assumption set is being taken as given."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "A probability will be reused downstream by people who may not know the reference population, information state, or assumptions used to produce it."}, {"display_text": "The cost of a denominator error is high enough that the probability statement needs auditability.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The missing conditioning frame lets actors mix marginal and conditional probabilities, compare rates with different denominators, ignore base rates, reuse numbers outside their valid context, or treat an updated probability as if it were unconditional. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The cost of a denominator error is high enough that the probability statement needs auditability. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The cost of a denominator error is high enough that the probability statement needs auditability.", "The missing conditioning frame lets actors mix marginal and conditional probabilities, compare rates with different denominators, ignore base rates, reuse numbers outside their valid context, or treat an updated probability as if it were unconditional."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 8, "text": "The cost of a denominator error is high enough that the probability statement needs auditability."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 14, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-014", "ledger_sha256": "afcbe7f8d1296dc9682196060fa10f97ca465fd762e770f71066b732b13c3098"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Configuration-Space Expansion", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:configuration_space_expansion", "slug": "configuration_space_expansion"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 2 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 2}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Required paths, roles, surfaces, objects, or motions necessarily collide, interfere, congest, block access, or become unreachable because all candidate arrangements are confined to the same physical configuration space.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Required relations necessarily collide or become unreachable because all feasible arrangements are confined to an insufficient physical configuration space."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "This branch preserves the complete remedy-free diagnostic route; goals, feasibility clauses, gates, deployment constraints, and supporting context remain outside the DNF."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "EXT001-C017", "dnf": [["EXT001-U017-O1"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"obligation_id": "EXT001-U017-O1", "predicate": "The conflict is caused by confinement to the current configuration space."}], "predicate": "The conflict is caused by confinement to the current configuration space.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "The conflict is caused by confinement to the current configuration space.", "unit_id": "EXT001-U017"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"catalog_exhaustion": "CONDITION_LEVEL", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The conflict is caused by confinement to the current configuration space.", "slug": "sacrifice_periphery_to_defend_core"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The conflict is caused by confinement to the current configuration space.", "slug": "containment"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The conflict is caused by confinement to the current configuration space.", "slug": "dissonance"}], "residual_id": "EXT001:configuration_space_expansion:C02", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding."}}, "condition_id": "ext001_configuration_space_expansion_a02", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The conflict is caused by confinement to that space rather than poor optimization within it. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The conflict is caused by confinement to that space rather than poor optimization within it."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The conflict is caused by confinement to the current configuration space.", "slug": "sacrifice_periphery_to_defend_core"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The conflict is caused by confinement to the current configuration space.", "slug": "containment"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The conflict is caused by confinement to the current configuration space.", "slug": "dissonance"}], "normalized_requirement": "The conflict is caused by confinement to the current configuration space.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The conflict is caused by confinement to the current configuration space.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "EXT001-C018", "dnf": [["EXT001-U018-O1"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"obligation_id": "EXT001-U018-O1", "predicate": "Repositioning, sequencing, partitioning, and interface changes inside that space remain infeasible or dominated."}], "predicate": "Repositioning, sequencing, partitioning, and interface changes inside that space remain infeasible or dominated.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Repositioning, sequencing, partitioning, and interface changes inside that space remain infeasible or dominated.", "unit_id": "EXT001-U018"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"catalog_exhaustion": "CONDITION_LEVEL", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Repositioning, sequencing, partitioning, and interface changes inside that space remain infeasible or dominated.", "slug": "continuity"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Repositioning, sequencing, partitioning, and interface changes inside that space remain infeasible or dominated.", "slug": "refactoring"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Repositioning, sequencing, partitioning, and interface changes inside that space remain infeasible or dominated.", "slug": "fixed_point"}], "residual_id": "EXT001:configuration_space_expansion:C03", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding."}}, "condition_id": "ext001_configuration_space_expansion_a03", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Repositioning, sequencing, partitioning, and interface changes inside the current space remain infeasible or dominated. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Repositioning, sequencing, partitioning, and interface changes inside the current space remain infeasible or dominated."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Repositioning, sequencing, partitioning, and interface changes inside that space remain infeasible or dominated.", "slug": "continuity"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Repositioning, sequencing, partitioning, and interface changes inside that space remain infeasible or dominated.", "slug": "refactoring"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Repositioning, sequencing, partitioning, and interface changes inside that space remain infeasible or dominated.", "slug": "fixed_point"}], "normalized_requirement": "Repositioning, sequencing, partitioning, and interface changes inside that space remain infeasible or dominated.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Repositioning, sequencing, partitioning, and interface changes inside that space remain infeasible or dominated.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The current line, plane, layer, face set, orientation set, or motion axes can be explicitly defined.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: The current line, plane, layer, face set, orientation set, or motion axes can be explicitly defined. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The current line, plane, layer, face set, orientation set, or motion axes can be explicitly defined."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "The current line, plane, layer, face set, orientation set, or motion axes can be explicitly defined."}, {"display_text": "A physically available independent coordinate can separate the conflicting relations.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The current space is simpler to support and control, but its dimensional confinement forces incompatible relations to share occupancy; a new coordinate restores feasibility at the cost of added interfaces, transitions, stability, and control burden. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: A physically available independent coordinate can separate the conflicting relations. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A physically available independent coordinate can separate the conflicting relations.", "The current space is simpler to support and control, but its dimensional confinement forces incompatible relations to share occupancy; a new coordinate restores feasibility at the cost of added interfaces, transitions, stability, and control burden."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "A physically available independent coordinate can separate the conflicting relations."}, {"display_text": "Transition, support, reference, control, access, and recovery can be governed.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The current space is simpler to support and control, but its dimensional confinement forces incompatible relations to share occupancy; a new coordinate restores feasibility at the cost of added interfaces, transitions, stability, and control burden. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: Transition, support, reference, control, access, and recovery can be governed. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Transition, support, reference, control, access, and recovery can be governed.", "The current space is simpler to support and control, but its dimensional confinement forces incompatible relations to share occupancy; a new coordinate restores feasibility at the cost of added interfaces, transitions, stability, and control burden."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Transition, support, reference, control, access, and recovery can be governed."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"candidate_ledger_sha256": "96f72d2139077fd57bf795048ebef33b3fd574b20963170080ec916b5b3b92fe", "extension_id": "new-archetypes-extension-001", "ledger_id": "prime-production-v1.2-extension-001", "ledger_sha256": "9644520614744632d1d36da44b1acd77ce432852c6083eb871203521c166efce"}, "base_projection_sha256": "841e0c7f3cb8e8054475ad29a8a14745a416b4fc115559a44878b94292e673ec", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "ca09ed9fe1598ce7072755b530de5553f5ee0a7cd64ae82d9e4a4e2149a37788", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Conflict-of-Interest Mitigation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:conflict_of_interest_mitigation", "slug": "conflict_of_interest_mitigation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 10, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 3, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 3, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 1, "open_conditions": 6, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 10 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 3 of 10 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 10}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Conflict-of-interest failures are usually structural before they are personal. Organizations assign people multiple roles, rely on small expert communities, mix public and private incentives, concentrate information, and create funding or appointment dependencies. They then ask individuals to recognize and neutralize the resulting risk through a disclosure form or a promise to be objective. This arrangement leaves the interested actor to define the matter, interpret materiality, decide whether to report, select the mitigation, and sometimes verify compliance. The control shares the conflict it is meant to govern.\n\nSeveral structural pathways recur.\n\n### The final-vote illusion\n\nFormal rules often focus on approval or voting. Influence, however, begins earlier and continues later. A person may place an item on the agenda, narrow the options, select evaluators, define technical criteria, choose evidence, control access, frame risk, negotiate terms, lobby colleagues, appoint the substitute, direct implementation, or review a challenge. Leaving the room for the vote does not interrupt these paths. Effective recusal must be scoped across the whole decision lifecycle.\n\n### Information as a benefit\n\nA conflicted actor may gain from privileged bid, personnel, market, enforcement, clinical, research, or product information even without deciding the matter. Removing approval rights while leaving shared drives, assistants, meeting invitations, dashboards, or informal briefings intact fails to control the risk. Information firewalls need technical permissions, procedural boundaries, communication rules, exception approval, logs, and breach response.\n\n### Reviewer dependence\n\nThe nominal ethics officer, manager, committee, auditor, or board can share the same sponsor, reporting line, funding source, reputation, appointment path, or legal exposure. Formal separation is not enough. Reviewer independence depends on who appoints and can remove the reviewer, whether the reviewer has protected resources and evidence access, whether findings are binding or merely advisory, and where the reviewer can escalate a conflict involving its own authority.\n\n### Institutional conflict hidden inside individual forms\n\nIndividual registers miss interests held by the organization: revenue concentration, donor restrictions, product incentives, grant overhead, enforcement targets, industry data access, political sponsorship, litigation exposure, or future labor markets. An institution may pressure individuals without any one person owning the interest. Recusing a person while preserving the institutional incentive changes the name on the decision, not the influence architecture.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A person or institution entrusted to decide, advise, review, allocate, regulate, investigate, procure, publish, or represent also holds a financial, relational, professional, political, intellectual, competitive, or dependency interest that could pull judgment away from the governing duty. The system either ignores the interest, demands disclosure without action, permits self-policing, focuses only on the final vote, or imposes blanket exclusion. Informal agenda control, privileged information, proxy influence, cumulative relationships, institutional funding, and reviewer conflicts remain hidden. Decisions may be substantively distorted or merely impossible to trust; both effects damage legitimacy, competition, evidence quality, and affected-party rights."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P013-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include a decision-maker rather than an unaffected observer.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An actor or institution has authority or influence over a decision.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must connect the actor's own benefit to an outcome of the decision they influence.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "One available outcome of that decision would benefit the decision-maker.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve potential benefit rather than require proven realized gain.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The decision-maker is capable of benefiting; receipt of the benefit need not already have occurred.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail a benefit large or consequential enough to matter to the decision relation.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The possible benefit is material rather than negligible.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "A decision-maker can materially benefit from one outcome.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A decision-maker may receive a material benefit from one available decision outcome.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P013-C02-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime includes incompatible duties to multiple principals that need not materially benefit the decision-maker from any outcome.", "slug": "conflict_of_interest"}], "residual_id": "r:conflict_of_interest_mitigation:b014_a04_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b014_a04_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: a decision maker can materially benefit from one outcome. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["a decision maker can materially benefit from one outcome"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Tried a complete concession instance under this mapping; the selected DNF branch remains necessary.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Concession", "one_liner": "Grant a peripheral or indefensible part of the opposing case while continuing to contest the rest, purchasing credibility through costly-looking admission and, if the granted claim was not load-bearing, harvesting narrowing, burden-shift, and board-clearing at once.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:concession", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "concession"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "concession", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P013-C02-U1", "why_it_fits": "Exact candidate structure entails the selected DNF branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Tried a complete value_proposition instance under this mapping; the selected DNF branch remains necessary.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Value Proposition", "one_liner": "Articulate, in a structured object with named slots, what benefit an offering delivers for a specific customer segment under a specific constraint and why it beats named alternatives — a targeted, contrastive, capability-honest statement that serves as the shared referent for aligning product, pricing, marketing, and sales.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:value_proposition", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "value_proposition"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "value_proposition", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P013-C02-U1", "why_it_fits": "Exact candidate structure entails the selected DNF branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Tried a complete impression_management instance under this mapping; the selected DNF branch remains necessary.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Impression Management", "one_liner": "Shape how an audience evaluates an actor by first deciding which public image is worth pursuing, then selecting, displaying, and suppressing self-relevant cues to construct that impression under the audience's expectations and constraints.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:impression_management", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "impression_management"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "impression_management", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P013-C02-U1", "why_it_fits": "Exact candidate structure entails the selected DNF branch."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A decision-maker can materially benefit from one outcome.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P013-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include responsibility for evaluating, reviewing, selecting, or judging.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An actor or institution occupies an evaluator or reviewer role.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must relate the evaluator to a party whose position is relevant to the evaluation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The counterpart is an applicant, subject, competitor, sponsor, or comparable party connected to the evaluation.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail an evaluator-counterparty relationship rather than mere awareness of the party.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The evaluator has a relationship with the evaluation-connected party.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve consequential relationship strength rather than any trivial contact.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The relationship is consequential enough to matter to the evaluation setting.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "An evaluator has a consequential relationship with an applicant, subject, competitor, or sponsor.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An evaluator has a consequential relationship with a party connected to the evaluation.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P013-C04-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A conflict can arise without an evaluator-applicant relationship, such as ownership or dual-principal duties.", "slug": "conflict_of_interest"}], "residual_id": "r:conflict_of_interest_mitigation:b014_a04_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b014_a04_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: an evaluator has a relationship with an applicant, subject, competitor, or sponsor. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["an evaluator has a relationship with an applicant, subject, competitor, or sponsor"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "No complete exact instance can preserve the candidate while falsifying the selected complete DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Key Informant", "one_liner": "Gain deeper access to how a social system works by recruiting participants for their structural position — gatekeeper, broker, marginal participant, long-tenure incumbent, recent entrant — treating each account as positionally biased and structurally informative rather than population-representative.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:key_informant", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "key_informant"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "key_informant", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P013-C04-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record entails one complete DNF branch without a qualifier or solution-operation substitution."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "No complete exact instance can preserve the candidate while falsifying the selected complete DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Peer Debriefing", "one_liner": "Guard qualitative analysis against the researcher's own normalised assumptions by having a competent-but-removed outsider probe the reasoning while it is still revisable — producing not a verdict but a documented audit trail of what was challenged and what changed.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:peer_debriefing", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "peer_debriefing"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "peer_debriefing", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P013-C04-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record entails one complete DNF branch without a qualifier or solution-operation substitution."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Tried a complete martha_mitchell_effect instance under this mapping; the selected DNF branch remains necessary.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Martha Mitchell effect", "one_liner": "Diagnose the trap in which an evaluator discounts a true but improbable report as delusional purely on its low prior probability, never testing whether its external referent is real.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:martha_mitchell_effect", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "martha_mitchell_effect"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "martha_mitchell_effect", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P013-C04-U1", "why_it_fits": "Exact candidate structure entails the selected DNF branch."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "An evaluator has a consequential relationship with an applicant, subject, competitor, or sponsor.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P013-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require an oversight relation rather than dependency between peer firms.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A regulator or oversight institution governs an industry or regulated party.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail dependency directed from regulator to regulated industry.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The regulator depends on the same industry it oversees.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail financial-resource dependence of the regulator on the regulated industry.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A complete branch is regulator dependence on the industry for funding.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail informational dependence of the regulator on the regulated industry.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A complete branch is regulator dependence on the industry for information needed in oversight.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail a prospective career dependency linking regulator personnel to the industry.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "A complete branch is regulator dependence on the industry as a source of future employment.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "A regulator depends on its regulated industry for funding, information, or future employment.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A regulator depends on the industry it oversees through a specified resource or career channel.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P013-C05-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Capture can arise through ideology, access, or political influence without the listed dependency.", "slug": "regulatory_capture"}], "residual_id": "r:conflict_of_interest_mitigation:b014_a04_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b014_a04_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: a regulator depends on the industry it oversees for funding, information, or future employment. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["a regulator depends on the industry it oversees for funding, information, or future employment"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Capture can arise through ideology, access, or political influence without the listed dependency.", "slug": "regulatory_capture"}], "normalized_requirement": "A regulator depends on its regulated industry for funding, information, or future employment.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A regulator depends on its regulated industry for funding, information, or future employment.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P013-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require fiduciary duty rather than generic role pressure.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An actor or institution occupies a fiduciary role.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include two principal roles served by the same fiduciary.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The fiduciary serves two distinct principals.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail simultaneous duty relations to the two principals.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The fiduciary owes service or duty to both principals.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require conflicting principal interests rather than two aligned beneficiaries.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The interests of the two principals are incompatible.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "A fiduciary serves two principals whose interests are incompatible.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "One fiduciary owes service to two principals with incompatible interests.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P013-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Incompatible role expectations need not be fiduciary duties to two principals.", "slug": "role_conflict"}], "residual_id": "r:conflict_of_interest_mitigation:b014_a04_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b014_a04_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: a fiduciary serves two principals with incompatible interests. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["a fiduciary serves two principals with incompatible interests"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Incompatible role expectations need not be fiduciary duties to two principals.", "slug": "role_conflict"}], "normalized_requirement": "A fiduciary serves two principals whose interests are incompatible.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A fiduciary serves two principals whose interests are incompatible.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B5", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P013-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"], ["O1", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must apply to a professional knowledge, evaluation, care, journalism, or standards role.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The actor is a researcher, reviewer, clinician, journalist, standards expert, or comparable professional with evaluative or public-trust responsibilities.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail a sponsorship relationship involving the professional actor.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A complete branch is that the professional actor has a tie to a sponsor.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail ownership or beneficial-interest linkage involving the professional actor.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A complete branch is that the professional actor has an ownership tie.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "A researcher, reviewer, clinician, journalist, or standards expert has sponsor or ownership ties.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A professional evaluative or public-trust actor has a sponsorship or ownership tie.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P013-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Conflicts can be relational, political, intellectual, or dependency-based without sponsor or ownership ties.", "slug": "conflict_of_interest"}], "residual_id": "r:conflict_of_interest_mitigation:b014_a04_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b014_a04_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A researcher, reviewer, clinician, journalist, or standards expert has sponsor or ownership ties. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["a researcher, reviewer, clinician, journalist, or standards expert has sponsor or ownership ties"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Tried a complete propaganda_model instance under this mapping; the selected DNF branch remains necessary.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Propaganda Model", "one_liner": "Explain patterned media bias structurally rather than by motive — five institutional filters (ownership, advertising, sourcing, flak, ideological premise) shape every story before publication, so the slant is a property of the constraints, not anyone's intent.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:propaganda_model", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "propaganda_model"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "propaganda_model", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P013-C07-U1", "why_it_fits": "Exact candidate structure entails the selected DNF branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Without the one qualifier, O2 can fail; with it the selected branch is necessary.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Watchdog Journalism", "one_liner": "Model the press as an independent, adversarial monitor of the powerful whose exposures route to voters, regulators, or courts the monitored actor does not control — so its capacity reads off four structural elements and fails through capture or chilling effect.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:watchdog_journalism", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "watchdog_advertising_capture_tie", "predicate": "the press monitor is captured through an advertising tie to the monitored party", "rationale": "The one context guard actualizes or selects a named exact-record event or branch without adding a principal role or restating the structural head."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "watchdog_journalism"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "the press monitor is captured through an advertising tie to the monitored party"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "watchdog_journalism", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P013-C07-U1", "why_it_fits": "Exact spine plus one anchored atomic qualifier entails the selected DNF branch."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A researcher, reviewer, clinician, journalist, or standards expert has sponsor or ownership ties.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 5", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B6", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P013-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include a participant with access to a selection or adjudication process.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An actor participates in procurement, hiring, grant, moderation, adjudication, or a comparable decision process.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail criterion-setting or agenda influence rather than only a final vote.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The participant can shape criteria used by the decision process.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve ability or opportunity rather than require documented criterion manipulation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The participant has the capability to shape criteria even if influence is not proven to have been exercised.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail pre-recusal influence and a subsequent recusal boundary.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The criterion-shaping opportunity occurs before the participant's later recusal.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "A participant can shape decision criteria before later recusal from procurement, hiring, grant, moderation, or adjudication.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A decision-process participant can influence criteria before a later recusal.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P013-C08-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A conflict need not include agenda control before a recusal event.", "slug": "conflict_of_interest"}], "residual_id": "r:conflict_of_interest_mitigation:b014_a04_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b014_a04_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: a procurement, hiring, grant, moderation, or adjudication participant can shape criteria before recusal. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["a procurement, hiring, grant, moderation, or adjudication participant can shape criteria before recusal"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A conflict need not include agenda control before a recusal event.", "slug": "conflict_of_interest"}], "normalized_requirement": "A participant can shape decision criteria before later recusal from procurement, hiring, grant, moderation, or adjudication.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A participant can shape decision criteria before later recusal from procurement, hiring, grant, moderation, or adjudication.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 6", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B7", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P013-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include institutional review, investigation, or adjudication of a conflict.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An institution occupies the reviewer role for a conflict.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern review of a conflict involving the reviewing institution's own named interest or a faithful comparable interest, without a separate magnitude test.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The reviewed object is a conflict involving the institution's own leadership, revenue, reputation, legal exposure, or a comparable institutional interest.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail reviewer-interest identity rather than review of another institution's conflict; no consequentiality threshold may be added.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The implicated interest belongs to the same institution that conducts the review.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "An institution reviews a conflict involving its own leadership, revenue, reputation, or legal exposure.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An institution reviews a conflict involving the institution's own interest.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P013-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An individual conflict need not involve institutional self-review.", "slug": "conflict_of_interest"}], "residual_id": "r:conflict_of_interest_mitigation:b014_a04_c7", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b014_a04_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A university can be conflicted by sponsor revenue or reputational exposure. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: An institution reviews a conflict involving its own leadership, revenue, reputation, or legal exposure.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["an institution reviews a conflict involving its own leadership, revenue, reputation, or legal exposure", "A university can be conflicted by sponsor revenue or reputational exposure."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An individual conflict need not involve institutional self-review.", "slug": "conflict_of_interest"}], "normalized_requirement": "An institution reviews a conflict involving its own leadership, revenue, reputation, or legal exposure.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "An institution reviews a conflict involving its own leadership, revenue, reputation, or legal exposure.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 7", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B8", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A conflict may remain stable with no changed outside interest.", "slug": "conflict_of_interest"}], "residual_id": "r:conflict_of_interest_mitigation:b014_a04_c8", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b014_a04_c8", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: an outside role, gift, family relationship, board seat, campaign interest, or intellectual commitment changes. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["an outside role, gift, family relationship, board seat, campaign interest, or intellectual commitment changes"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A conflict may remain stable with no changed outside interest.", "slug": "conflict_of_interest"}], "normalized_requirement": "An outside role, gift, family relation, board seat, campaign interest, or intellectual commitment changes.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "An outside role, gift, family relation, board seat, campaign interest, or intellectual commitment changes.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [8], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 8", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B9", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P013-C10", "dnf": [], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [], "predicate": "A reasonable informed observer would question impartiality despite no proven misconduct.", "resolution": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RESIDUAL", "semantic_scope": "NON_ABSTRACTION", "structural_head": "A reasonable informed observer's doubt crosses an appearance-of-impartiality threshold without proven misconduct.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P013-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A structural conflict can be immaterial, disclosed, or effectively mitigated and need not create reasonable appearance-based doubt.", "slug": "conflict_of_interest"}], "residual_id": "r:conflict_of_interest_mitigation:b014_a04_c9", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b014_a04_c9", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A reasonable informed observer would question impartiality despite no proven misconduct. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [9], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["a reasonable informed observer would question impartiality despite no proven misconduct"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RECLASSIFIED", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 1, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A structural conflict can be immaterial, disclosed, or effectively mitigated and need not create reasonable appearance-based doubt.", "slug": "conflict_of_interest"}], "normalized_requirement": "A reasonable informed observer would question impartiality despite no proven misconduct.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RECLASSIFIED", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later candidate-blind atomization classified this remainder as a threshold, parameter, materiality test, or other non-abstraction rather than a catalog gap."}, "predicate": "A reasonable informed observer would question impartiality despite no proven misconduct.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [9], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 9", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B10", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P013-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include an existing mitigation plan rather than an unaddressed newly discovered issue.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A prior plan is intended to mitigate a conflict, interest, access, duty, or decision-scope risk.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include present circumstances that the mitigation plan is supposed to cover.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Current access, ownership, duties, decision scope, or comparable conflict-relevant circumstances form the plan's fit target.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail a substantive plan-to-current-state mismatch rather than mere plan age.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The prior plan does not match the current conflict-relevant circumstances.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require temporal drift from prior planning to current conditions.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The plan no longer fits, preserving loss of prior adequacy or relevance over time.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "A prior mitigation plan no longer matches current access, ownership, duties, or decision scope.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A previously established mitigation plan no longer fits current conflict-relevant circumstances.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P013-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A conflict can be newly identified or stably mitigated without an obsolete prior plan.", "slug": "conflict_of_interest"}], "residual_id": "r:conflict_of_interest_mitigation:b014_a04_c10", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b014_a04_c10", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: a prior mitigation plan no longer fits access, ownership, duties, or decision scope. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [10], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["a prior mitigation plan no longer fits access, ownership, duties, or decision scope"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A conflict can be newly identified or stably mitigated without an obsolete prior plan.", "slug": "conflict_of_interest"}], "normalized_requirement": "A prior mitigation plan no longer matches current access, ownership, duties, or decision scope.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A prior mitigation plan no longer matches current access, ownership, duties, or decision scope.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [10], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 10", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "DISJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 14, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-014", "ledger_sha256": "afcbe7f8d1296dc9682196060fa10f97ca465fd762e770f71066b732b13c3098"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Conformance Control and Corrective Feedback", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:conformance_control_and_corrective_feedback", "slug": "conformance_control_and_corrective_feedback"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Outputs propagate despite uncertain or inconsistent conformance because requirements, evidence, release authority, disposition, containment, and process feedback are disconnected. Defects are found late, reworked informally, or recorded without preventing recurrence.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Outputs propagate despite uncertain or inconsistent conformance because requirements, evidence, release authority, disposition, containment, and process feedback are disconnected. Defects are found late, reworked informally, or recorded without preventing recurrence."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a specification, measurement, comparison, and release action separating conforming from rejected or reworked outputs.", "role_mapping": "Specification -> explicit requirements; output -> item; release gate -> conformance enforcement.", "slug": "quality_control", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b014_a05_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Outputs propagate despite uncertain or inconsistent conformance because requirements, evidence, release authority, disposition, containment, and process feedback are disconnected. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Outputs must satisfy explicit safety, functional, contractual, regulatory, or interoperability requirements.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Outputs must satisfy explicit safety, functional, contractual, regulatory, or interoperability requirements.", "Outputs propagate despite uncertain or inconsistent conformance because requirements, evidence, release authority, disposition, containment, and process feedback are disconnected."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Quality Control", "one_liner": "Checking output against a specification before release and rejecting or reworking non-conforming items, binding process variation to defined tolerances through a measure-compare-act feedback gate.", "page_ref": "prime:quality_control", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Specification -> explicit requirements; output -> item; release gate -> conformance enforcement.", "slug": "quality_control", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a specification, measurement, comparison, and release action separating conforming from rejected or reworked outputs."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Outputs must satisfy explicit safety, functional, contractual, regulatory, or interoperability requirements.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime replaces a nominal value with an acceptance interval and models process variation that can fall outside its limits.", "role_mapping": "Variation -> process spread; tolerance interval -> accepted range; outside value -> nonconformance.", "slug": "engineering_tolerances", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b014_a05_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Process variation can push characteristics outside accepted tolerances. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Process variation can push characteristics outside accepted tolerances."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Engineering Tolerances", "one_liner": "Acceptable variation.", "page_ref": "prime:engineering_tolerances", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Variation -> process spread; tolerance interval -> accepted range; outside value -> nonconformance.", "slug": "engineering_tolerances", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime replaces a nominal value with an acceptance interval and models process variation that can fall outside its limits."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Process variation can move output characteristics outside declared acceptance tolerances.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P013-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require defect escape rather than a defect caught before propagation.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A defect or nonconforming output passes beyond an upstream detection, containment, or release boundary.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must make defect escape causal for the downstream outcome rather than incidental.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The escaped defect causes the branch-specific downstream consequence.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail adverse downstream harm caused by the escaped defect; that harm may overlap with rework, delay, or trust loss.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A complete branch is downstream harm caused by the escaped defect.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail corrective work after the defect has propagated.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A complete branch is downstream rework caused by the escaped defect.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail schedule or throughput delay after defect escape.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "A complete branch is downstream delay caused by the escaped defect.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail degradation of stakeholder trust following defect propagation.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "A complete branch is loss of trust caused by the escaped defect.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "An escaped defect causes downstream harm, rework, delay, or trust loss.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A defect that escaped upstream control causes a specified downstream consequence.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P013-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A functioning quality-control gate can catch every sampled nonconformance before downstream escape.", "slug": "quality_control"}], "residual_id": "r:conformance_control_and_corrective_feedback:b014_a05_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b014_a05_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Defect escape creates downstream harm, rework, delay, or loss of trust. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Defect escape creates downstream harm, rework, delay, or loss of trust."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Tried a complete injection_weakness instance under this mapping; the selected DNF branch remains necessary.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Injection Weakness", "one_liner": "The software-security failure in which untrusted data crosses into a control channel and a downstream interpreter executes it as command, query, or instruction — a collapse of the data/control boundary that a legitimate, often credential-free, input channel is enough to exploit.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:injection_weakness", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "injection_weakness"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "injection_weakness", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P013-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "Exact candidate structure entails the selected DNF branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Tried a complete transfer_learning_attack instance under this mapping; the selected DNF branch remains necessary.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Transfer-Learning Attack", "one_liner": "Vulnerabilities, backdoors, or poisoned representations baked into an upstream pretrained model ride intact into every downstream system built on it, because the downstream team's audit boundary encloses only its new layers while the attack surface spans the whole inherited substrate.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:transfer_learning_attack", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "transfer_learning_attack"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "transfer_learning_attack", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P013-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "Exact candidate structure entails the selected DNF branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Without the one qualifier, O2, O3 can fail; with it the selected branch is necessary.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Latent Condition", "one_liner": "Name the dormant, pre-staged weakness in a system's defence layers — laid down by upstream decisions far from the sharp end — that produces no harm until an operational circumstance aligns it with an active failure to complete a path to an accident.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:latent_condition", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2", "O3"], "guard_type": "MODALITY_ACTUALIZATION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "latent_condition_actual_accident", "predicate": "the latent condition actually activates into a downstream accident", "rationale": "The one context guard actualizes or selects a named exact-record event or branch without adding a principal role or restating the structural head."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "latent_condition"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "the latent condition actually activates into a downstream accident"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "latent_condition", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P013-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "Exact spine plus one anchored atomic qualifier entails the selected DNF branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Tried a complete imputation_leakage instance under this mapping; the selected DNF branch remains necessary.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Imputation Leakage", "one_liner": "The model-evaluation failure in which a missing-value repair step is fit across the train/test boundary, so its parameters encode facts about the held-out rows — inflating performance that survives into the test metric, because imputation, mentally filed as data cleaning, is really a model.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:imputation_leakage", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "imputation_leakage"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "imputation_leakage", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P013-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "Exact candidate structure entails the selected DNF branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "No complete exact instance can preserve the candidate while falsifying the selected complete DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Responsive-Layout Breakage", "one_liner": "Diagnose the silent UI failure where an interface's content survives a viewport, device, or locale transformation but its layout-encoded meaning — priority, adjacency, hierarchy, above-the-fold prominence — is lost, so a passing content-accessibility check actively conceals the defect.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:responsive_layout_breakage", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "responsive_layout_breakage"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "responsive_layout_breakage", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P013-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record entails one complete DNF branch without a qualifier or solution-operation substitution."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Without the one qualifier, O1, O2, O3 can fail; with it the selected branch is necessary.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Medication Error", "one_liner": "Any preventable deviation in the medication-use pipeline that could expose a patient to unintended pharmacologic action, whether or not harm results — a defence-in-depth failure whose harm rate is the product of escape probabilities across every stage, so leverage lies in downstream catch rates, not upstream error counts.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:medication_error", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1", "O2", "O3"], "guard_type": "MODALITY_ACTUALIZATION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "medication_error_actual_patient_harm", "predicate": "the medication error actually produces patient harm", "rationale": "The one context guard actualizes or selects a named exact-record event or branch without adding a principal role or restating the structural head."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "medication_error"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "the medication error actually produces patient harm"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "medication_error", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P013-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "Exact spine plus one anchored atomic qualifier entails the selected DNF branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "No complete exact instance can preserve the candidate while falsifying the selected complete DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Quote Laundering", "one_liner": "A provisional but accurate statement is cited across successive venues that each strip its caveats and scope, until it circulates as authoritative settled fact — a channel failure, not a false source, so it resists source correction and needs traceability instead.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:quote_laundering", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "quote_laundering"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "quote_laundering", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P013-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record entails one complete DNF branch without a qualifier or solution-operation substitution."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Tried a complete handoff_loss instance under this mapping; the selected DNF branch remains necessary.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Handoff Loss", "one_liner": "Locate post-transition failures at the transfer relation itself: work crossing a boundary between actors arrives degraded because a bounded artifact cannot carry the sender's tacit state, so downstream decisions run on an impoverished reconstruction.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:handoff_loss", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "handoff_loss"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "handoff_loss", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P013-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "Exact candidate structure entails the selected DNF branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "No complete exact instance can preserve the candidate while falsifying the selected complete DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Correction Burial", "one_liner": "The editorial pathology in which a correction reaches a systematically smaller audience than the error it repairs — the original ran at high amplitude, the correction at low — so the public belief record stays unrepaired even though a correction was formally issued.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:correction_burial", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "correction_burial"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "correction_burial", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P013-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record entails one complete DNF branch without a qualifier or solution-operation substitution."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "No complete exact instance can preserve the candidate while falsifying the selected complete DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "S&OP Disconnect", "one_liner": "Diagnose a firm's downstream execution crises as an upstream planning defect — separate functions each holding an internally sound but mutually incompatible plan for the same future, because no binding forum reconciles them before commitments are taken.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:s_op_disconnect", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "s_op_disconnect"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "s_op_disconnect", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P013-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record entails one complete DNF branch without a qualifier or solution-operation substitution."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Tried a complete synthetic_media_laundering instance under this mapping; the selected DNF branch remains necessary.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Synthetic Media Laundering", "one_liner": "The information-ecosystem failure in which algorithmically generated content enters an evidence channel past an unscrutinized intake node and is progressively washed through authenticating intermediaries until downstream consumers treat it as verified-provenance reality.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:synthetic_media_laundering", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "synthetic_media_laundering"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "synthetic_media_laundering", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P013-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "Exact candidate structure entails the selected DNF branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Tried a complete prompt_injection instance under this mapping; the selected DNF branch remains necessary.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Prompt Injection", "one_liner": "Untrusted content delivered to a language model through a data channel is interpreted as instructions rather than material to process, so an embedded directive executes at the model's privilege — the failure being the absence of any in-band boundary between instructions and data, not a lapse in alignment.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:prompt_injection", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "prompt_injection"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "prompt_injection", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P013-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "Exact candidate structure entails the selected DNF branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Without the one qualifier, O2, O3 can fail; with it the selected branch is necessary.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Hazard-Control Decay", "one_liner": "Track the widening gap between what a safety control's paperwork says it does and what it actually does under hazard, so that a control certified sound by audit can be found silently unprotective before it fails.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:hazard_control_decay", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2", "O3"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "hazard_control_decay_actual_incident", "predicate": "the decayed hazard control actually causes a downstream incident", "rationale": "The one context guard actualizes or selects a named exact-record event or branch without adding a principal role or restating the structural head."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "hazard_control_decay"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "the decayed hazard control actually causes a downstream incident"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "hazard_control_decay", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P013-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "Exact spine plus one anchored atomic qualifier entails the selected DNF branch."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "An escaped defect causes downstream harm, rework, delay, or trust loss.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Measurement and sampling can provide timely evidence before propagation.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: Measurement and sampling can provide timely evidence before propagation. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Measurement and sampling can provide timely evidence before propagation."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Measurement and sampling can provide timely evidence before propagation."}, {"display_text": "The producing process can be adjusted using defect and drift information.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: The producing process can be adjusted using defect and drift information. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The producing process can be adjusted using defect and drift information."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The producing process can be adjusted using defect and drift information."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 14, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-014", "ledger_sha256": "afcbe7f8d1296dc9682196060fa10f97ca465fd762e770f71066b732b13c3098"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Conformity Pressure Calibration", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:conformity_pressure_calibration", "slug": "conformity_pressure_calibration"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Individuals, teams, markets, audiences, or communities align their beliefs, expressions, or behaviors with a perceived group standard before independent judgment has been captured and before the standard has been tested for legitimacy, evidence, proportionality, or fit. The visible group signal becomes both evidence and pressure; each act of alignment makes the standard look stronger for the next actor, even when private doubts or better information are widely distributed.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Individuals, teams, markets, audiences, or communities align their beliefs, expressions, or behaviors with a perceived group standard before independent judgment has been captured and before the standard has been tested for legitimacy, evidence, proportionality, or fit. The visible group signal becomes both evidence and pressure; each act of alignment makes the standard look stronger for the next actor, even when private doubts or better information are widely distributed."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a perceived aggregate signal to bend individual belief or behavior toward the group standard.", "role_mapping": "Aggregate signal -> visible standard; perception -> observability.", "slug": "conformity", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b014_a06_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: People can observe what peers, leaders, majorities, ranking systems, trend metrics, or reference groups appear to believe or do. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["People can observe what peers, leaders, majorities, ranking systems, trend metrics, or reference groups appear to believe or do."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Conformity", "one_liner": "Aligning one's behaviour or beliefs to a group standard.", "page_ref": "prime:conformity", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Aggregate signal -> visible standard; perception -> observability.", "slug": "conformity", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a perceived aggregate signal to bend individual belief or behavior toward the group standard."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "People can observe what peers, leaders, majorities, ranking systems, trend metrics, or reference groups appear to believe or do.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Informational conformity can occur under uncertainty with no sanction or nonalignment cost.", "slug": "conformity"}], "residual_id": "r:conformity_pressure_calibration:b014_a06_c2", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b014_a06_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Nonalignment carries reputational, relational, economic, procedural, identity, access, or sanction costs. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Nonalignment carries reputational, relational, economic, procedural, identity, access, or sanction costs."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Informational conformity can occur under uncertainty with no sanction or nonalignment cost.", "slug": "conformity"}], "normalized_requirement": "Nonalignment carries reputational, relational, economic, procedural, identity, access, or sanction costs.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Nonalignment carries reputational, relational, economic, procedural, identity, access, or sanction costs.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Normative conformity can bend public conduct even when the actor is not uncertain and does not treat the group as evidence.", "slug": "conformity"}], "residual_id": "r:conformity_pressure_calibration:b014_a06_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b014_a06_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Actors are uncertain and therefore treat the group standard as information about what is true, safe, acceptable, or rewarded. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Actors are uncertain and therefore treat the group standard as information about what is true, safe, acceptable, or rewarded."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Normative conformity can bend public conduct even when the actor is not uncertain and does not treat the group as evidence.", "slug": "conformity"}], "normalized_requirement": "Uncertain actors treat the visible group standard as evidence of truth, safety, acceptance, or reward.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Uncertain actors treat the visible group standard as evidence of truth, safety, acceptance, or reward.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a systematic gap between private and public distributions sustained by reading conformity as conviction.", "role_mapping": "Private distribution -> private belief; public signal -> expression; gap -> unreliable agreement.", "slug": "private_public_preference_divergence", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime requires expression-cost asymmetry to make actors voice a cheaper preference than the one privately held.", "role_mapping": "Nonalignment cost -> expression asymmetry; public statement -> expressed preference; private view -> held preference.", "slug": "preference_falsification", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b014_a06_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Individuals, teams, markets, audiences, or communities align their beliefs, expressions, or behaviors with a perceived group standard before independent judgment has been captured and before the standard has been tested for legitimacy, evidence, proportionality, or fit. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Public expression is more visible than private belief, making it hard to tell genuine agreement from compliance, politeness, fear, or strategic silence.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Public expression is more visible than private belief, making it hard to tell genuine agreement from compliance, politeness, fear, or strategic silence.", "Individuals, teams, markets, audiences, or communities align their beliefs, expressions, or behaviors with a perceived group standard before independent judgment has been captured and before the standard has been tested for legitimacy, evidence, proportionality, or fit."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Private-Public Preference Divergence", "one_liner": "A systematic gap between the distribution of privately-held preferences (or beliefs) in a group and the distribution publicly expressed or inferred, sustained because each member reads others' conformity as conviction and conforms in turn.", "page_ref": "prime:private_public_preference_divergence", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Private distribution -> private belief; public signal -> expression; gap -> unreliable agreement.", "slug": "private_public_preference_divergence", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a systematic gap between private and public distributions sustained by reading conformity as conviction."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Preference Falsification", "one_liner": "Under asymmetric cost on expression, agents voice a cheaper preference than the one they privately hold, so the visible distribution diverges from the held one.", "page_ref": "prime:preference_falsification", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Nonalignment cost -> expression asymmetry; public statement -> expressed preference; private view -> held preference.", "slug": "preference_falsification", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires expression-cost asymmetry to make actors voice a cheaper preference than the one privately held."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Public expression is more visible than private belief, making it hard to tell genuine agreement from compliance, politeness, fear, or strategic silence.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P013-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include a socially visible collective or metric capable of serving as a norm signal.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A majority, elite, metric, cohort, profession, clique, or comparable visible group signal supplies the candidate standard.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail practical norm authority rather than mere popularity or visibility.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The visible signal becomes the de facto standard for relevant actors.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require absence of a deliberate legitimacy, evidence, fit, or proportionality review.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The de facto standard is not established through explicit review.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "A majority, elite, platform metric, cohort, profession, or clique becomes a de facto standard without explicit review.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A visible group signal becomes a de facto standard without explicit review.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P013-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Conformity can respond to a formally reviewed legitimate group norm.", "slug": "conformity"}], "residual_id": "r:conformity_pressure_calibration:b014_a06_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b014_a06_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A majority, elite, platform metric, cohort, professional culture, or local clique is becoming the de facto standard without explicit review. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A majority, elite, platform metric, cohort, professional culture, or local clique is becoming the de facto standard without explicit review."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "No complete exact instance can preserve the candidate while falsifying the selected complete DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Annotation Drift", "one_liner": "The gradual, undocumented shift over time in how annotators apply an unchanged rubric, so identical instances get different labels — a silent recalibration of a measurement instrument, invisible to within-slice agreement and detectable only by re-annotating frozen gold.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:annotation_drift", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "annotation_drift"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "annotation_drift", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P013-C12-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record entails one complete DNF branch without a qualifier or solution-operation substitution."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A majority, elite, platform metric, cohort, profession, or clique becomes a de facto standard without explicit review.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A conformity episode need not persist historically through any listed reinforcement channel.", "slug": "conformity"}], "residual_id": "r:conformity_pressure_calibration:b014_a06_c7", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b014_a06_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Past conformity has become self-reinforcing through habit, status rewards, onboarding rituals, default options, leader modeling, or algorithmic amplification. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Past conformity has become self-reinforcing through habit, status rewards, onboarding rituals, default options, leader modeling, or algorithmic amplification."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A conformity episode need not persist historically through any listed reinforcement channel.", "slug": "conformity"}], "normalized_requirement": "Past conformity becomes self-reinforcing through habit, status rewards, rituals, defaults, leader modeling, or algorithmic amplification.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Past conformity becomes self-reinforcing through habit, status rewards, rituals, defaults, leader modeling, or algorithmic amplification.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The setting needs coordination, consistency, or shared norms, but also needs independent evidence, dissent, creativity, autonomy, or ethical judgment.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Groups need shared standards to coordinate, but the same standards can convert social visibility and sanction pressure into a feedback loop that suppresses independent information, autonomy, and legitimate variation. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: The setting needs coordination, consistency, or shared norms, but also needs independent evidence, dissent, creativity, autonomy, or ethical judgment. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The setting needs coordination, consistency, or shared norms, but also needs independent evidence, dissent, creativity, autonomy, or ethical judgment.", "Groups need shared standards to coordinate, but the same standards can convert social visibility and sanction pressure into a feedback loop that suppresses independent information, autonomy, and legitimate variation."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The setting needs coordination, consistency, or shared norms, but also needs independent evidence, dissent, creativity, autonomy, or ethical judgment."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 14, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-014", "ledger_sha256": "afcbe7f8d1296dc9682196060fa10f97ca465fd762e770f71066b732b13c3098"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Confounder Control", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:confounder_control", "slug": "confounder_control"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 5, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is common-cause entanglement. A third variable can influence both who receives the exposure and what outcome occurs. Without control, the focal relationship may look causal even when it is mainly a reflection of age, severity, prior performance, motivation, geography, timing, case mix, institutional context, or another background driver.\n\nThe dangerous form is false attribution: the visible intervention receives credit or blame for outcomes that were substantially shaped before the intervention ever occurred.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A supposed cause and an outcome are both influenced by another variable, context, selection pathway, or baseline condition. Without controlling this common cause, the observed relationship may overstate, understate, reverse, or fabricate the focal effect."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a putative causal X-to-Y effect whose observed association also contains a noncausal common-cause contribution.", "role_mapping": "Exposure -> X; outcome -> Y; causal claim -> estimand.", "slug": "confounding", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b014_a07_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A causal claim is being made from comparison, observation, historical evidence, program data, or experiment-like evidence. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A causal claim is being made from comparison, observation, historical evidence, program data, or experiment-like evidence."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Confounding", "one_liner": "Hidden variable interference.", "page_ref": "prime:confounding", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Exposure -> X; outcome -> Y; causal claim -> estimand.", "slug": "confounding", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a putative causal X-to-Y effect whose observed association also contains a noncausal common-cause contribution."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "An observed association is used to support a causal claim about an exposure and outcome.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires differential inclusion linked to exposure and outcome strata, making the observed sample nonrepresentative of the target.", "role_mapping": "Selection mechanism -> assignment/inclusion; baseline variables -> differential inclusion.", "slug": "selection_bias", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b014_a07_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Exposure or treatment was not fully randomized, or assignment may have been influenced by baseline attributes, choices, eligibility, timing, or context. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Exposure or treatment was not fully randomized, or assignment may have been influenced by baseline attributes, choices, eligibility, timing, or context."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Selection Bias", "one_liner": "Skewed sampling.", "page_ref": "prime:selection_bias", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Selection mechanism -> assignment/inclusion; baseline variables -> differential inclusion.", "slug": "selection_bias", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires differential inclusion linked to exposure and outcome strata, making the observed sample nonrepresentative of the target."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Exposure or inclusion is not randomized and depends on baseline attributes, choices, eligibility, timing, or context.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a pre-exposure third variable associated with exposure through a noncausal path and causal for the outcome.", "role_mapping": "Compared exposure groups -> X levels; baseline difference -> Z associated with X; outcome effect -> Z causes Y.", "slug": "confounding", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b014_a07_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Groups differ before the exposure in ways that plausibly affect the outcome. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Groups differ before the exposure in ways that plausibly affect the outcome."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Confounding", "one_liner": "Hidden variable interference.", "page_ref": "prime:confounding", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Compared exposure groups -> X levels; baseline difference -> Z associated with X; outcome effect -> Z causes Y.", "slug": "confounding", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a pre-exposure third variable associated with exposure through a noncausal path and causal for the outcome."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Compared groups differ before exposure on a variable that also affects the outcome.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime definitionally requires a common-cause variable associated with exposure through a back-door path and causal for outcome.", "role_mapping": "Third variable -> confounder; exposure/outcome -> X/Y.", "slug": "confounding", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b014_a07_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Domain knowledge suggests a third factor can influence both the exposure and the outcome. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Domain knowledge suggests a third factor can influence both the exposure and the outcome."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Confounding", "one_liner": "Hidden variable interference.", "page_ref": "prime:confounding", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Third variable -> confounder; exposure/outcome -> X/Y.", "slug": "confounding", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime definitionally requires a common-cause variable associated with exposure through a back-door path and causal for outcome."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A third factor influences both exposure and outcome.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires the observed association to mix the focal effect with a noncausal back-door contribution.", "role_mapping": "Simple association -> mixed observed effect; alternative path -> confounding contribution.", "slug": "confounding", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b014_a07_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A simple association is being treated as an effect without explaining why alternative causal pathways are not driving it. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A simple association is being treated as an effect without explaining why alternative causal pathways are not driving it."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Confounding", "one_liner": "Hidden variable interference.", "page_ref": "prime:confounding", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Simple association -> mixed observed effect; alternative path -> confounding contribution.", "slug": "confounding", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires the observed association to mix the focal effect with a noncausal back-door contribution."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A simple exposure-outcome association is treated as an effect without ruling out alternative causal paths.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P013-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern variables selected for causal adjustment or control.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A design or analysis contains an adjustment set of control variables.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a multi-variable adjustment set large enough for role selection to be material.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The adjustment set contains many variables rather than one isolated covariate.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must distinguish causal roles that determine whether adjustment is appropriate.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Relevant variable roles include confounder, mediator, collider, irrelevant covariate, or comparable causal-graph classifications.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail absence of role-specific adjustment justification rather than a documented causal selection rationale.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The design or analysis has not justified which included variables occupy which causal roles.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "A many-variable adjustment set has not justified which variables are confounders, mediators, colliders, or irrelevant covariates.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A many-variable causal adjustment set lacks justification for its variables' causal roles.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P013-C13-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Confounding can be controlled by a correct minimal adjustment set and need not involve many unjustified controls.", "slug": "confounding"}], "residual_id": "r:confounder_control:b014_a07_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b014_a07_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A design or analysis includes many control variables but has not justified which variables are true confounders, mediators, colliders, or irrelevant covariates. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A design or analysis includes many control variables but has not justified which variables are true confounders, mediators, colliders, or irrelevant covariates."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Confounding can be controlled by a correct minimal adjustment set and need not involve many unjustified controls.", "slug": "confounding"}], "normalized_requirement": "A many-variable adjustment set has not justified which variables are confounders, mediators, colliders, or irrelevant covariates.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A many-variable adjustment set has not justified which variables are confounders, mediators, colliders, or irrelevant covariates.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 14, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-014", "ledger_sha256": "afcbe7f8d1296dc9682196060fa10f97ca465fd762e770f71066b732b13c3098"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Conjunctive Path Assurance", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:conjunctive_path_assurance", "slug": "conjunctive_path_assurance"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 7 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 7}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A causal graph contains one or more routes from an initiating condition to an unacceptable outcome. Each edge is inactive under ordinary conditions and conducts only in a particular mode, configuration, timing window, authority state, environmental condition, or human workflow state. Local reviews examine factors or safeguards separately and find none sufficient for failure. Under a rare but feasible conjunction, however, every edge on one route conducts at once or in the required sequence, making the outcome reachable without any single dramatic defect.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A causal graph contains one or more routes from an initiating condition to an unacceptable outcome. Each edge is inactive under ordinary conditions and conducts only in a particular mode, configuration, timing window, authority state, environmental condition, or human workflow state. Local reviews examine factors or safeguards separately and find none sufficient for failure. Under a rare but feasible conjunction, however, every edge on one route conducts at once or in the required sequence, making the outcome reachable without any single dramatic defect."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a directed causal graph with a latent hazard-to-outcome path whose edges conduct only in specified states.", "role_mapping": "Initiator -> hazard source; outcome -> protected target failure; conditional edges -> safeguards or modes.", "slug": "conjunctive_path_activation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b014_a08_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The system has several conditional safeguards, modes, permissions, or dependencies between a hazard source and protected target. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The system has several conditional safeguards, modes, permissions, or dependencies between a hazard source and protected target."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Conjunctive Path Activation", "one_liner": "A latent causal path becomes live only when every state-conditional edge along it conducts at once, making the failure invisible to factor-by-factor audit.", "page_ref": "prime:conjunctive_path_activation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Initiator -> hazard source; outcome -> protected target failure; conditional edges -> safeguards or modes.", "slug": "conjunctive_path_activation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a directed causal graph with a latent hazard-to-outcome path whose edges conduct only in specified states."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A hazard source and protected target are linked by a path of conditional safeguards, modes, permissions, or dependencies.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires individually rare edge-conducting states to coincide so every edge on the path conducts.", "role_mapping": "Rare states -> listed configurations; joint activation -> incident window.", "slug": "conjunctive_path_activation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b014_a08_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Incidents or near misses occur only under rare configurations, maintenance states, handoffs, peaks, retries, overrides, or timing overlaps. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Incidents or near misses occur only under rare configurations, maintenance states, handoffs, peaks, retries, overrides, or timing overlaps."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Conjunctive Path Activation", "one_liner": "A latent causal path becomes live only when every state-conditional edge along it conducts at once, making the failure invisible to factor-by-factor audit.", "page_ref": "prime:conjunctive_path_activation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Rare states -> listed configurations; joint activation -> incident window.", "slug": "conjunctive_path_activation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires individually rare edge-conducting states to coincide so every edge on the path conducts."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The path activates only under a rare joint configuration, maintenance state, handoff, retry, override, or timing overlap.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's load-bearing invariant is blindness of factor-by-factor audit to an AND-activated path.", "role_mapping": "One-factor tests -> isolated edge review; integrated failure -> full path conduction.", "slug": "conjunctive_path_activation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b014_a08_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: One-factor-at-a-time tests pass, but integrated behavior remains surprising or unstable. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["One-factor-at-a-time tests pass, but integrated behavior remains surprising or unstable."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Conjunctive Path Activation", "one_liner": "A latent causal path becomes live only when every state-conditional edge along it conducts at once, making the failure invisible to factor-by-factor audit.", "page_ref": "prime:conjunctive_path_activation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "One-factor tests -> isolated edge review; integrated failure -> full path conduction.", "slug": "conjunctive_path_activation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's load-bearing invariant is blindness of factor-by-factor audit to an AND-activated path."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "One-factor-at-a-time tests pass while integrated behavior remains unsafe or surprising.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A latent path can activate from environmental state alignment without any new local change supplying an edge.", "slug": "conjunctive_path_activation"}], "residual_id": "r:conjunctive_path_assurance:b014_a08_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b014_a08_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A change appears locally safe yet may supply the final missing edge of an existing latent path. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A change appears locally safe yet may supply the final missing edge of an existing latent path."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A latent path can activate from environmental state alignment without any new local change supplying an edge.", "slug": "conjunctive_path_activation"}], "normalized_requirement": "A locally safe change may provide the final missing conducting edge of an existing latent path.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A locally safe change may provide the final missing conducting edge of an existing latent path.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P013-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern a joint or conjunctive risk estimate with more than one contributing state.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A risk estimate combines probabilities of multiple contributing states.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail multiplicative composition of marginal probabilities rather than another aggregation rule.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The estimate multiplies the states' marginal probabilities.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require omission of a common-driver or dependence check.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The estimation process does not test whether the contributing states share a causal driver.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve uncertainty about dependence and must not require that a common driver is proven.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Shared-driver dependence remains an untested possibility rather than an asserted fact.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "Risk estimates multiply marginal probabilities without checking whether contributing states share a driver.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A joint-risk estimate multiplies marginal state probabilities without testing shared-driver dependence.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P013-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "AND activation does not require analysts to multiply marginal probabilities or miss a common driver.", "slug": "conjunctive_path_activation"}], "residual_id": "r:conjunctive_path_assurance:b014_a08_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b014_a08_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Risk estimates multiply marginal probabilities without testing whether the contributing states share a driver. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Risk estimates multiply marginal probabilities without testing whether the contributing states share a driver."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "AND activation does not require analysts to multiply marginal probabilities or miss a common driver.", "slug": "conjunctive_path_activation"}], "normalized_requirement": "Risk estimates multiply marginal probabilities without checking whether contributing states share a driver.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Risk estimates multiply marginal probabilities without checking whether contributing states share a driver.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P013-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include multiple nominally redundant units rather than one safeguard.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "At least two barriers, teams, or comparable units are intended to provide redundancy.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail an independence assumption attached to the redundant units.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The redundant units are assumed to operate independently.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require actual sharing of a named factor or faithful comparable factor, without requiring that the factor is proven to couple the units.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The redundant units share a sensor, authority, infrastructure, procedure, environment, or comparable factor.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the contrast between assumed independence and actual factor sharing, but must not require proven dependence or falsity of independence.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The shared factor coexists in tension with the assumption that the redundant units are independent, without proving that genuine independence is false.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Redundant barriers or teams share sensors, authority, infrastructure, procedures, or environment despite assumed independence.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Units treated as redundant and independent nevertheless share a factor.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P013-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Layered defenses can be genuinely independent and do not require a hidden shared dependency.", "slug": "defense_in_depth"}], "residual_id": "r:conjunctive_path_assurance:b014_a08_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b014_a08_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Redundant barriers or teams are assumed independent even though they share sensors, authority, infrastructure, procedures, or environment. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Redundant barriers or teams are assumed independent even though they share sensors, authority, infrastructure, procedures, or environment."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Layered defenses can be genuinely independent and do not require a hidden shared dependency.", "slug": "defense_in_depth"}], "normalized_requirement": "Redundant barriers or teams share sensors, authority, infrastructure, procedures, or environment despite assumed independence.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Redundant barriers or teams share sensors, authority, infrastructure, procedures, or environment despite assumed independence.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires an AND over several state-conditional edges that cannot be exposed by single-factor review.", "role_mapping": "Higher-order interaction -> multi-edge conjunction; uncovered by pairwise tests -> audit blindness.", "slug": "conjunctive_path_activation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b014_a08_c8", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The system state space is large enough that ordinary scenario lists or pairwise tests leave higher-order interactions uncovered. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The system state space is large enough that ordinary scenario lists or pairwise tests leave higher-order interactions uncovered."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Conjunctive Path Activation", "one_liner": "A latent causal path becomes live only when every state-conditional edge along it conducts at once, making the failure invisible to factor-by-factor audit.", "page_ref": "prime:conjunctive_path_activation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Higher-order interaction -> multi-edge conjunction; uncovered by pairwise tests -> audit blindness.", "slug": "conjunctive_path_activation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires an AND over several state-conditional edges that cannot be exposed by single-factor review."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The state space contains higher-order interactions that ordinary scenario lists or pairwise tests leave uncovered.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [8], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A high-consequence outcome is plausible, but historical event frequency is too low to reveal the activating combination empirically.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: A high-consequence outcome is plausible, but historical event frequency is too low to reveal the activating combination empirically. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A high-consequence outcome is plausible, but historical event frequency is too low to reveal the activating combination empirically."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "A high-consequence outcome is plausible, but historical event frequency is too low to reveal the activating combination empirically."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 14, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-014", "ledger_sha256": "afcbe7f8d1296dc9682196060fa10f97ca465fd762e770f71066b732b13c3098"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Consensus Convergence", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:consensus_convergence", "slug": "consensus_convergence"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 2, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is distributed divergence under action dependency. Multiple actors have to move together, but their views point in different directions. They may disagree about facts, interpret the same evidence differently, care about different outcomes, bear different risks, or use the same words to mean different things.\n\nWithout an explicit convergence path, the group tends to oscillate between endless discussion, premature voting, vague agreement, authority override, or false consensus. The visible symptom may be repeated meetings with no narrowing, decisions that are re-litigated later, implementation resistance after formal approval, or quiet participants who later reveal that they never accepted the agreement.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Multiple actors need to coordinate on a decision, interpretation, standard, diagnosis, plan, or commitment, but their beliefs, preferences, incentives, or meanings remain divergent enough that unstructured action would fragment, stall, or generate hidden resistance."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires distributed autonomous actors to align separate actions into a coherent collective output.", "role_mapping": "Group members -> actors; alignment -> act together; output -> joint action.", "slug": "coordination", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b014_a09_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The group must act together. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The group must act together"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Coordination", "one_liner": "Aligning independently controlled actors so their separate actions combine into a coherent collective outcome despite distributed decision-making and incomplete shared information.", "page_ref": "prime:coordination", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Group members -> actors; alignment -> act together; output -> joint action.", "slug": "coordination", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires distributed autonomous actors to align separate actions into a coherent collective output."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The group must act together.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P014-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must relate multiple actors rather than variation within one actor.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Two or more actors are compared.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require material underlying difference and exclude surface-only variation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The actors' divergence is substantive rather than merely cosmetic.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only if the compared actors' beliefs differ substantively.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A complete branch is substantive divergence in the actors' beliefs.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only if the compared actors' preferences differ substantively.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A complete branch is substantive divergence in the actors' preferences.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only if the compared actors' incentives differ substantively.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "A complete branch is substantive divergence in the actors' incentives.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only if the compared actors' meanings differ substantively.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "A complete branch is substantive divergence in the actors' meanings.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Two or more actors diverge substantively rather than cosmetically in their beliefs, preferences, incentives, or meanings.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "actors have substantive rather than cosmetic divergence", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P014-C01-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Coordination can align actors who already agree but need timing or information protocols.", "slug": "coordination"}], "residual_id": "r:consensus_convergence:b014_a09_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b014_a09_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Divergence is real rather than cosmetic. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Divergence is real rather than cosmetic"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A proposed complete candidate instance that falsifies the selected source branch conflicts with the candidate's exact defining roles or relation.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Naive Realism", "one_liner": "Explain intractable disagreement as the converging conviction that one perceives the world directly, that all rational observers would agree, and that dissenters must be biased — relocating the dispute from the facts to each party's invisible construction of them.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:naive_realism", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "naive_realism"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "naive_realism", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P014-C01-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every exact naive-realism instance requires multiple parties to treat materially incompatible belief constructions as reality, satisfying the belief branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A proposed complete candidate instance that falsifies the selected source branch conflicts with the candidate's exact defining roles or relation.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Crab Mentality", "one_liner": "Diagnose in-group sabotage of a member who rises above the shared baseline by the cost-without-gain signature — a voluntarily costly leveling act yielding no individual gain — which reveals asymmetric relative-position concern under identity threat rather than competition.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:crab_mentality", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "crab_mentality"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "crab_mentality", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P014-C01-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact sanctioning pattern necessarily contrasts the rising member's preference to advance with peers' preference to pull that member back."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The actors' beliefs, preferences, incentives, or meanings diverge substantively rather than cosmetically.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P014-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must apply to a contested problem rather than an uncontested analytical task.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A problem is contested among relevant actors or interpretations.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require empirical or evidential content within the problem.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The contested problem contains an evidence component.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must combine evidence and judgment rather than concern either component alone.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The evidence component is combined with a judgment component in the same problem.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only if values enter the required judgment.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A complete branch is that the judgment component is value-laden.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only if interpretation enters the required judgment.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "A complete branch is that the judgment component is interpretive.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A contested problem combines an evidence component with either value-laden or interpretive judgment.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "a contested problem combines evidence with judgment", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P014-C02-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Agreement can concern a purely empirical estimate or a purely normative rule.", "slug": "consensus"}], "residual_id": "r:consensus_convergence:b014_a09_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b014_a09_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The problem has both evidence and judgment components. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The problem has both evidence and judgment components"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Without the qualifier a complete candidate instance can miss O1, but with the atomic qualifier the exact spine entails the selected branch.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Toulmin Model", "one_liner": "Decompose an informal argument into six named slots — claim, grounds, warrant, backing, qualifier, rebuttal — so evaluation becomes a completeness check that isolates the usually-implicit warrant, where almost every contested dispute actually lives.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:toulmin_model", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "warrant_actually_contested", "predicate": "the warrant is actually contested", "rationale": "The qualifier is single, minimal, candidate-anchored, and fills only the listed contingent gap while preserving the exact structural spine."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "toulmin_model"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "the warrant is actually contested"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "toulmin_model", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P014-C02-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact model supplies evidence plus interpretive judgment, and one atomic condition that the warrant is actually contested completes the interpretive branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Without the qualifier a complete candidate instance can miss O1, but with the atomic qualifier the exact spine entails the selected branch.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Deliberative Rhetoric", "one_liner": "The Aristotelian genre of public speech that advises a deciding body on future action by weighing expected advantage against harm — classified by aim and temporal orientation, not surface form, and carrying a distinct forecast-under-uncertainty proof-burden.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:deliberative_rhetoric", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "contested_deliberative_question", "predicate": "The future-action question before the deciding body is contested among relevant actors or interpretations.", "rationale": "The qualifier is single, minimal, candidate-anchored, and fills only the listed contingent gap while preserving the exact structural spine."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "deliberative_rhetoric"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The future-action question before the deciding body is contested among relevant actors or interpretations."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "deliberative_rhetoric", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P014-C02-U1", "why_it_fits": "Deliberative rhetoric supplies an evidence-bearing, value-laden judgment spine, but a complete genre instance need not be contested; the atomic contest guard supplies that fact."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The contested problem combines evidence with value-laden or interpretive judgment.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Simple authority is insufficient or undesirable.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is most useful when formal authority or simple voting would produce a decision but not enough shared understanding or buy-in to make implementation stable. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Simple authority is insufficient or undesirable. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Simple authority is insufficient or undesirable", "It is most useful when formal authority or simple voting would produce a decision but not enough shared understanding or buy-in to make implementation stable."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Simple authority is insufficient or undesirable"}, {"display_text": "Residual disagreement can be compatible with action if it is named.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Good use cases include standards committees, expert panels, cross-functional strategy decisions, community planning processes, project alignment, incident response coordination, and governance discussions where residual disagreement can be named and bounded. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: Residual disagreement can be compatible with action if it is named. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Residual disagreement can be compatible with action if it is named", "Good use cases include standards committees, expert panels, cross-functional strategy decisions, community planning processes, project alignment, incident response coordination, and governance discussions where residual disagreement can be named and bounded."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Residual disagreement can be compatible with action if it is named"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 14, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-014", "ledger_sha256": "afcbe7f8d1296dc9682196060fa10f97ca465fd762e770f71066b732b13c3098"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Consent Manufacturing Through Intellectual Leadership", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:consent_manufacturing_through_intellectual_leadership", "slug": "consent_manufacturing_through_intellectual_leadership"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is that consent is socially produced. Stakeholders do not decide in a vacuum; they inherit vocabularies, expert cues, narratives, and judgments about which alternatives are serious. If those interpretive supports are unmanaged, legitimacy may fail. If they are managed covertly, consent may be manufactured rather than earned.\n\nThe core tension is therefore double-edged. Shared frames are necessary for coordination and collective reasoning, but the institutions that create shared frames can also naturalize power, narrow discourse, and turn interested assumptions into apparent common sense.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A policy, ideology, strategy, institutional agenda, or interpretive frame cannot gain durable acceptance through formal authority alone, because stakeholders need the frame to feel credible, natural, expert-endorsed, and socially legitimate before they will treat it as common sense."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires dominant interests to secure consent by making their worldview taken for granted through intellectual and moral leadership.", "role_mapping": "Dominant worldview -> agenda; consent -> broad acceptance; uninspected interests -> soft control.", "slug": "cultural_hegemony", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b014_a10_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A contested agenda needs broad acceptance across people who will not inspect all underlying evidence or interests directly. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A contested agenda needs broad acceptance across people who will not inspect all underlying evidence or interests directly."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Cultural Hegemony", "one_liner": "Dominant ideology control.", "page_ref": "prime:cultural_hegemony", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Dominant worldview -> agenda; consent -> broad acceptance; uninspected interests -> soft control.", "slug": "cultural_hegemony", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires dominant interests to secure consent by making their worldview taken for granted through intellectual and moral leadership."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A contested agenda seeks broad acceptance among people who will not inspect all underlying evidence or interests.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P014-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include an existing formal mandate and an acceptance target.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A formal mandate exists and seeks acceptance from relevant people.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail insufficiency of formal authority rather than merely supplementing an already sufficient mandate.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The formal mandate alone is insufficient to secure acceptance.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require interpretive legitimacy as a prerequisite for acceptance.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Acceptance depends on an interpretive rationale that makes the mandate legitimate.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the stated causal direction from legitimacy dependence to mandate insufficiency.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The legitimacy prerequisite explains why the mandate alone is insufficient.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "An existing formal mandate is insufficient to secure acceptance because acceptance depends on an interpretive rationale for its legitimacy.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "formal mandate is insufficient without interpretive legitimacy", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P014-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime can operate entirely through civil institutions and taken-for-granted assumptions without an existing formal mandate.", "slug": "cultural_hegemony"}], "residual_id": "r:consent_manufacturing_through_intellectual_leadership:b014_a10_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b014_a10_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Formal mandates exist but are insufficient because people need an interpretive rationale for why the mandate is legitimate. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Formal mandates exist but are insufficient because people need an interpretive rationale for why the mandate is legitimate."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime can operate entirely through civil institutions and taken-for-granted assumptions without an existing formal mandate.", "slug": "cultural_hegemony"}], "normalized_requirement": "Formal mandate is insufficient because acceptance depends on an interpretive rationale of legitimacy.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Formal mandate is insufficient because acceptance depends on an interpretive rationale of legitimacy.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires institutional reinforcement through schools, media, professional intellectuals, and cultural channels.", "role_mapping": "Civil institutions -> listed channels; doxa -> reasonable frame.", "slug": "cultural_hegemony", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b014_a10_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Multiple institutions, media channels, schools, professional bodies, or internal leaders already shape what the audience treats as reasonable. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Multiple institutions, media channels, schools, professional bodies, or internal leaders already shape what the audience treats as reasonable."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Cultural Hegemony", "one_liner": "Dominant ideology control.", "page_ref": "prime:cultural_hegemony", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Civil institutions -> listed channels; doxa -> reasonable frame.", "slug": "cultural_hegemony", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires institutional reinforcement through schools, media, professional intellectuals, and cultural channels."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Institutions, media, schools, professions, or trusted leaders shape what an audience treats as reasonable.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P014-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve emergence toward dominance rather than only an established narrative.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A narrative is in the process of becoming dominant.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require absent explicit evidence governance.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Explicit governance over the narrative's evidence is absent.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require absent explicit rules for admitting or handling dissent.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Explicit governance of dissent is absent.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require absent explicit treatment of competing alternatives.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Explicit governance of alternative narratives is absent.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require absent explicit conflict-of-interest governance.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Explicit governance of conflicts of interest is absent.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "A narrative is becoming dominant while explicit governance of its evidence, dissent, alternatives, and conflicts of interest is absent.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "an emerging dominant narrative lacks explicit epistemic governance", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P014-C04-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Hegemonic framing can be fully established rather than merely emerging, and its evidence governance need not be explicitly absent.", "slug": "cultural_hegemony"}], "residual_id": "r:consent_manufacturing_through_intellectual_leadership:b014_a10_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b014_a10_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A dominant narrative is emerging without explicit governance over evidence, dissent, alternatives, and conflicts of interest. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A dominant narrative is emerging without explicit governance over evidence, dissent, alternatives, and conflicts of interest."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Hegemonic framing can be fully established rather than merely emerging, and its evidence governance need not be explicitly absent.", "slug": "cultural_hegemony"}], "normalized_requirement": "A dominant narrative is emerging without explicit governance of evidence, dissent, alternatives, or conflicts of interest.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A dominant narrative is emerging without explicit governance of evidence, dissent, alternatives, or conflicts of interest.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The organization must distinguish transparent education and public reasoning from manipulative consent manufacture.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: The organization must distinguish transparent education and public reasoning from manipulative consent manufacture. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The organization must distinguish transparent education and public reasoning from manipulative consent manufacture."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The organization must distinguish transparent education and public reasoning from manipulative consent manufacture."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 14, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-014", "ledger_sha256": "afcbe7f8d1296dc9682196060fa10f97ca465fd762e770f71066b732b13c3098"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Conservation Accounting", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:conservation_accounting", "slug": "conservation_accounting"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 2 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 2}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is opaque transformation. A system moves, converts, aggregates, deletes, delegates, or relabels something while still claiming that the relevant value or quantity has been preserved. Because the form changed, ordinary inspection can no longer tell whether the thing survived, leaked, duplicated, or was substituted.\n\nThis produces common symptoms: unexplained variance, shrinkage, phantom balances, orphaned obligations, hidden waste, or records that appear correct locally but fail to reconcile globally. The central tension is that transformation is necessary, but transformation weakens visibility unless the account is built into the transformation path.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A quantity expected to be preserved crosses transformations or boundaries whose opacity permits loss, leakage, duplication, substitution, or hidden transfer."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "This branch preserves the complete remedy-free diagnostic route; goals, feasibility clauses, gates, deployment constraints, and supporting context remain outside the DNF."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "EXT001-C019", "dnf": [["EXT001-U019-O1"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"obligation_id": "EXT001-U019-O1", "predicate": "A quantity is expected to remain present or equivalent across conversion, migration, handoff, consumption, storage, or reallocation."}], "predicate": "A quantity is expected to remain present or equivalent across conversion, migration, handoff, consumption, storage, or reallocation.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A quantity is expected to remain present or equivalent across conversion, migration, handoff, consumption, storage, or reallocation.", "unit_id": "EXT001-U019"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"catalog_exhaustion": "CONDITION_LEVEL", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: A quantity is expected to remain present or equivalent across conversion, migration, handoff, consumption, storage, or reallocation.", "slug": "turnover"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: A quantity is expected to remain present or equivalent across conversion, migration, handoff, consumption, storage, or reallocation.", "slug": "input_partition"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: A quantity is expected to remain present or equivalent across conversion, migration, handoff, consumption, storage, or reallocation.", "slug": "unevenness_waste"}], "residual_id": "EXT001:conservation_accounting:C01", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding."}}, "condition_id": "ext001_conservation_accounting_a01", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored trigger_conditions, structural_problem fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: A quantity is expected to remain present or equivalent across conversion, migration, handoff, consumption, storage, or reallocation.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A quantity is expected to remain present or equivalent across conversion, migration, handoff, consumption, storage, or reallocation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: A quantity is expected to remain present or equivalent across conversion, migration, handoff, consumption, storage, or reallocation.", "slug": "turnover"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: A quantity is expected to remain present or equivalent across conversion, migration, handoff, consumption, storage, or reallocation.", "slug": "input_partition"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: A quantity is expected to remain present or equivalent across conversion, migration, handoff, consumption, storage, or reallocation.", "slug": "unevenness_waste"}], "normalized_requirement": "A quantity is expected to remain present or equivalent across conversion, migration, handoff, consumption, storage, or reallocation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A quantity is expected to remain present or equivalent across conversion, migration, handoff, consumption, storage, or reallocation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Escape and leakage necessarily contains a constrained quantity crossing a containment boundary through an unintended pathway, which entails a boundary at which the quantity can leak.", "role_mapping": "The constrained resource maps to the accounted quantity; the containment boundary maps to the handoff or system boundary.", "slug": "escape_and_leakage", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "ext001_conservation_accounting_a02", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored trigger_conditions, structural_problem fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: The quantity crosses a boundary at which it could leak or be externalized.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The quantity crosses a boundary at which it could leak or be externalized."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Escape and Leakage", "one_liner": "Constrained quantities exit through unintended pathways.", "page_ref": "prime:escape_and_leakage", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "The constrained resource maps to the accounted quantity; the containment boundary maps to the handoff or system boundary.", "slug": "escape_and_leakage", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Escape and leakage necessarily contains a constrained quantity crossing a containment boundary through an unintended pathway, which entails a boundary at which the quantity can leak."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The quantity crosses a boundary at which it could leak or be externalized.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Preservation depends on conversion among forms, units, formats, states, accounts, or responsibility structures.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored trigger_conditions, structural_problem fields; the source file was not modified. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Preservation depends on conversion among forms, units, formats, states, accounts, or responsibility structures. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Preservation depends on conversion among forms, units, formats, states, accounts, or responsibility structures.", "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored trigger_conditions, structural_problem fields; the source file was not modified."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Preservation depends on conversion among forms, units, formats, states, accounts, or responsibility structures."}, {"display_text": "The cost of unexplained loss, duplication, manipulation, or dispute is material.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored trigger_conditions, structural_problem fields; the source file was not modified. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: The cost of unexplained loss, duplication, manipulation, or dispute is material. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The cost of unexplained loss, duplication, manipulation, or dispute is material.", "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored trigger_conditions, structural_problem fields; the source file was not modified."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The cost of unexplained loss, duplication, manipulation, or dispute is material."}, {"display_text": "Expected and observed balances, counts, records, obligations, or flows disagree.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored trigger_conditions, structural_problem fields; the source file was not modified. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Expected and observed balances, counts, records, obligations, or flows disagree. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Expected and observed balances, counts, records, obligations, or flows disagree.", "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored trigger_conditions, structural_problem fields; the source file was not modified."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Expected and observed balances, counts, records, obligations, or flows disagree."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"candidate_ledger_sha256": "96f72d2139077fd57bf795048ebef33b3fd574b20963170080ec916b5b3b92fe", "extension_id": "new-archetypes-extension-001", "ledger_id": "prime-production-v1.2-extension-001", "ledger_sha256": "9644520614744632d1d36da44b1acd77ce432852c6083eb871203521c166efce"}, "base_projection_sha256": "841e0c7f3cb8e8054475ad29a8a14745a416b4fc115559a44878b94292e673ec", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "ca09ed9fe1598ce7072755b530de5553f5ee0a7cd64ae82d9e4a4e2149a37788", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": [{"groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "EXTENSION_COUNTEREXAMPLE_AUDIT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A genuine stockout whose record also shows depletion is explicitly excluded; every complete phantom-inventory instance preserves the record-versus-reality mismatch.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Phantom Inventory", "one_liner": "Diagnose a fulfilment miss against a record showing healthy stock as an information-state failure — the record overstating reality between audits — that silently suppresses replenishment, pointing the fix at reconciliation cadence rather than the pick face.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:phantom_inventory", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "phantom_inventory"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "phantom_inventory", "source_unit_id": "EXT001-U020", "why_it_fits": "Phantom inventory necessarily contains a directional disagreement between an authoritative inventory balance and observed physical stock."}], "publication_role": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT_ONLY", "source_residual_occurrence_id": "EXT001:conservation_accounting:C05", "unit": {"case_id": "EXT001-C020", "dnf": [["EXT001-U020-O1"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"obligation_id": "EXT001-U020-O1", "predicate": "Expected and observed balances, counts, records, obligations, or flows disagree."}], "predicate": "Expected and observed balances, counts, records, obligations, or flows disagree.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Expected and observed balances, counts, records, obligations, or flows disagree.", "unit_id": "EXT001-U020"}}]}
{"archetype": {"name": "Conserved Reservoir-Flux Balancing", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:conserved_reservoir_flux_balancing", "slug": "conserved_reservoir_flux_balancing"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 2, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A conserved or quasi-conserved quantity moves through multiple stocks, accounts, compartments, queues, or pools, but the system lacks a shared reservoir-flux representation, so local decisions create unexplained accumulation, depletion, leakage, double counting, or burden shifting.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A conserved or quasi-conserved quantity moves through multiple stocks, accounts, compartments, queues, or pools, but the system lacks a shared reservoir-flux representation, so local decisions create unexplained accumulation, depletion, leakage, double counting, or burden shifting."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires named reservoirs whose accumulated contents are state variables evolving over time.", "role_mapping": "Reservoir -> named stock; content -> accumulated quantity; rate laws -> temporal change.", "slug": "reservoir_flux_network", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b014_a11_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A meaningful stock can accumulate, deplete, saturate, decay, or carry latent burden across time. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A meaningful stock can accumulate, deplete, saturate, decay, or carry latent burden across time."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Reservoir-Flux Network", "one_liner": "Named stocks linked by conserved flows.", "page_ref": "prime:reservoir_flux_network", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Reservoir -> named stock; content -> accumulated quantity; rate laws -> temporal change.", "slug": "reservoir_flux_network", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires named reservoirs whose accumulated contents are state variables evolving over time."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A named stock can accumulate, deplete, saturate, decay, or carry latent burden over time.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires named stocks joined by directed fluxes with conservation closure over internal transfers.", "role_mapping": "Reservoir nodes -> stocks; directed fluxes -> paths; closure -> conserved quantity.", "slug": "reservoir_flux_network", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b014_a11_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Multiple reservoirs exchange a conserved or quasi-conserved quantity through identifiable transfer paths. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Multiple reservoirs exchange a conserved or quasi-conserved quantity through identifiable transfer paths."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Reservoir-Flux Network", "one_liner": "Named stocks linked by conserved flows.", "page_ref": "prime:reservoir_flux_network", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Reservoir nodes -> stocks; directed fluxes -> paths; closure -> conserved quantity.", "slug": "reservoir_flux_network", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires named stocks joined by directed fluxes with conservation closure over internal transfers."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Multiple reservoirs exchange a conserved or quasi-conserved quantity through identifiable directed paths.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's rate laws and conservation closure couple reservoir balances, so internal outflow from one becomes inflow to another.", "role_mapping": "Local flux -> route change; coupled balances -> remote stock change.", "slug": "reservoir_flux_network", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b014_a11_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A local inflow, outflow, or routing change changes stock levels elsewhere in the system. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A local inflow, outflow, or routing change changes stock levels elsewhere in the system."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Reservoir-Flux Network", "one_liner": "Named stocks linked by conserved flows.", "page_ref": "prime:reservoir_flux_network", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Local flux -> route change; coupled balances -> remote stock change.", "slug": "reservoir_flux_network", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's rate laws and conservation closure couple reservoir balances, so internal outflow from one becomes inflow to another."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Changing a local inflow, outflow, or route changes stock levels elsewhere in the network.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P014-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O9"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve identity of a conserved content across multiple stocks, accounts, compartments, queues, or pools.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The affected content is the same conserved or quasi-conserved quantity across reservoirs.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail continuity of traceability sufficient for cross-reservoir reconciliation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The content remains traceable enough to reconcile across the reservoirs despite transformation.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve possibility rather than require that every instance undergo the transformation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The conserved content can undergo the selected transformation while retaining identity and traceability.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only if label transformation is possible.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A complete branch is that the content may change label.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only if unit transformation is possible.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "A complete branch is that the content may change unit.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only if quality transformation is possible.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "A complete branch is that the content may change quality.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only if custody transformation is possible.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "A complete branch is that the content may change custody.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only if concentration transformation is possible.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "A complete branch is that the content may change concentration.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only if accounting-category transformation is possible.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "A complete branch is that the content may change accounting category.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "The same conserved or quasi-conserved content may change label, unit, quality, custody, concentration, or accounting category while remaining traceable enough to reconcile across reservoirs.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "conserved content remains traceable across a category-changing transformation", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P014-C05-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A reservoir-flux network can transfer an unchanged quantity among same-unit stocks and does not require any listed transformation of label, unit, quality, custody, concentration, or accounting category.", "slug": "reservoir_flux_network"}], "residual_id": "r:conserved_reservoir_flux_balancing:b014_a11_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b014_a11_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The same quantity changes label, unit, quality, custody, concentration, or accounting category while remaining traceable enough to reconcile. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The same quantity changes label, unit, quality, custody, concentration, or accounting category while remaining traceable enough to reconcile."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A proposed complete candidate instance that falsifies the selected source branch conflicts with the candidate's exact defining roles or relation.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Biogeochemical Cycling", "one_liner": "Model the circulation of a conserved Earth-system element through compartmental reservoirs — each with a stock and residence time — linked by canonical transformations and governed by a rate-limiting bottleneck, with mass balance forced to close.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:biogeochemical_cycling", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "biogeochemical_cycling"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "biogeochemical_cycling", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P014-C05-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every exact instance tracks a conserved element through reservoirs and transformations with a closeable budget; the concentration-change branch is explicit."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A proposed complete candidate instance that falsifies the selected source branch conflicts with the candidate's exact defining roles or relation.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Biogeochemical Cycle", "one_liner": "Track how a chemical element moves through Earth's reservoirs via biological, geological, and chemical transformations, treating its conserved mass as a closeable budget of stocks, fluxes, and residence times.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:biogeochemical_cycle", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "biogeochemical_cycle"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "biogeochemical_cycle", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P014-C05-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact cycle requires mass-conserving transfers among reservoirs and explicitly allows transformation and concentration change without loss of identity."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The conserved content may change label, unit, quality, custody, concentration, or accounting category while remaining traceable across reservoirs.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P014-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O9"], ["O1", "O2", "O10"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must apply to a balance or outcome whose accounting can be affected.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A balance or comparable system outcome is the affected object.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail plausible possible influence and must not require that the effect has already occurred.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The selected anomaly or loss can plausibly affect the balance or outcome.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only if variance is unexplained and plausibly balance-relevant.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A complete branch is unexplained variance affecting the balance.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only if an unobserved sink is plausibly balance-relevant.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A complete branch is a hidden sink affecting the balance.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only if an untracked source is plausibly balance-relevant.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "A complete branch is an untracked source affecting the balance.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only if leakage is plausibly balance-relevant.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "A complete branch is leakage affecting the balance.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only if evaporation is plausibly balance-relevant.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "A complete branch is evaporation affecting the balance.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only if abandonment is plausibly balance-relevant.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "A complete branch is abandonment affecting the balance.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only if shrinkage is plausibly balance-relevant.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "A complete branch is shrinkage affecting the balance.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only if duplication in accounting is plausibly balance-relevant.", "obligation_id": "O10", "statement": "A complete branch is double counting affecting the balance.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A balance or system outcome may plausibly be affected by unexplained variance, a hidden sink, an untracked source, leakage, evaporation, abandonment, shrinkage, or double counting.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "an unaccounted anomaly or loss may affect a balance", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P014-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A closed and correctly bounded reservoir-flux model can account for every source, sink, and boundary exchange.", "slug": "reservoir_flux_network"}], "residual_id": "r:conserved_reservoir_flux_balancing:b014_a11_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b014_a11_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Unexplained variance, hidden sinks, untracked sources, leakage, evaporation, abandonment, shrinkage, or double counting plausibly affect outcomes. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Unexplained variance, hidden sinks, untracked sources, leakage, evaporation, abandonment, shrinkage, or double counting plausibly affect outcomes."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Without the qualifier a complete candidate instance can miss O4, but with the atomic qualifier the exact spine entails the selected branch.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Biogeochemical Cycling", "one_liner": "Model the circulation of a conserved Earth-system element through compartmental reservoirs — each with a stock and residence time — linked by canonical transformations and governed by a rate-limiting bottleneck, with mass balance forced to close.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:biogeochemical_cycling", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O4"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "hidden_sink_in_biogeochemical_cycling", "predicate": "The mass-balance residual's unidentified flux is a hidden sink.", "rationale": "The qualifier is single, minimal, candidate-anchored, and fills only the listed contingent gap while preserving the exact structural spine."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "biogeochemical_cycling"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The mass-balance residual's unidentified flux is a hidden sink."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "biogeochemical_cycling", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P014-C06-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record supplies a balance and consequential residual; one candidate-anchored branch-selection guard identifies the residual as the hidden-sink branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A proposed complete candidate instance that falsifies the selected source branch conflicts with the candidate's exact defining roles or relation.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Outbreak Underascertainment", "one_liner": "The surveillance failure in which recorded case counts fall systematically below the true count because a multi-stage detection pipeline — symptom expression, care-seeking, testing, confirmation, reporting — filters cases with biased attenuation at each layer.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:outbreak_underascertainment", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "outbreak_underascertainment"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "outbreak_underascertainment", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P014-C06-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every exact instance systematically removes cases from the recorded outcome through biased filters, so unaccounted shrinkage can affect the surveillance count."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Without the qualifier a complete candidate instance can miss O5, but with the atomic qualifier the exact spine entails the selected branch.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Sediment Budget", "one_liner": "Account for sediment as a mass-balance ledger of sources and sinks over a bounded coastal or fluvial cell, so the running balance — not the last storm — tells whether the shoreline is accreting, stable, or eroding.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:sediment_budget", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O5"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "untracked_source_in_sediment_budget", "predicate": "The budget's missing dominant term is an untracked sediment source.", "rationale": "The qualifier is single, minimal, candidate-anchored, and fills only the listed contingent gap while preserving the exact structural spine."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "sediment_budget"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The budget's missing dominant term is an untracked sediment source."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "sediment_budget", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P014-C06-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record supplies a consequential missing budget term, and one atomic candidate-anchored guard selects the untracked-source branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Without the qualifier a complete candidate instance can miss O4, but with the atomic qualifier the exact spine entails the selected branch.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Biogeochemical Cycle", "one_liner": "Track how a chemical element moves through Earth's reservoirs via biological, geological, and chemical transformations, treating its conserved mass as a closeable budget of stocks, fluxes, and residence times.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:biogeochemical_cycle", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O4"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "hidden_sink_in_biogeochemical_cycle", "predicate": "The mass-balance residual's unidentified flux is a hidden sink.", "rationale": "The qualifier is single, minimal, candidate-anchored, and fills only the listed contingent gap while preserving the exact structural spine."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "biogeochemical_cycle"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The mass-balance residual's unidentified flux is a hidden sink."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "biogeochemical_cycle", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P014-C06-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact budget-shortfall structure supplies the spine; one atomic hidden-sink predicate selects a complete source branch without changing roles."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Unexplained variance, hidden sinks, untracked sources, leakage, abandonment, shrinkage, or double counting affects the balance.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Decision makers need to coordinate throttling, release, replenishment, storage, conversion, or redirection across boundaries.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The network must preserve a conserved quantity across boundaries while still allowing local reservoirs and flows to change. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: Decision makers need to coordinate throttling, release, replenishment, storage, conversion, or redirection across boundaries. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Decision makers need to coordinate throttling, release, replenishment, storage, conversion, or redirection across boundaries.", "The network must preserve a conserved quantity across boundaries while still allowing local reservoirs and flows to change."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Decision makers need to coordinate throttling, release, replenishment, storage, conversion, or redirection across boundaries."}, {"display_text": "A pure network-flow optimization or a pure conservation ledger would miss stock dynamics, topology, or actionable control levers.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The intervention must make local control useful without letting local optimization hide global imbalance. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: A pure network-flow optimization or a pure conservation ledger would miss stock dynamics, topology, or actionable control levers. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A pure network-flow optimization or a pure conservation ledger would miss stock dynamics, topology, or actionable control levers.", "The intervention must make local control useful without letting local optimization hide global imbalance."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "A pure network-flow optimization or a pure conservation ledger would miss stock dynamics, topology, or actionable control levers."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 14, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-014", "ledger_sha256": "afcbe7f8d1296dc9682196060fa10f97ca465fd762e770f71066b732b13c3098"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": [{"groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A proposed complete candidate instance that falsifies the selected source branch conflicts with the candidate's exact defining roles or relation.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Circular Flow", "one_liner": "Represent the whole economy as two loops running opposite ways between households and firms, then track every off-loop flow as a leakage or an injection whose sums must balance when the loop closes in steady state.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:circular_flow", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "circular_flow"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "circular_flow", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P014-C07-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact circular-flow abstraction is a conserved ledger whose pure steady-state form leaves stock dynamics outside the representation, satisfying the supporting-context projection."}], "publication_role": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT_ONLY", "source_residual_occurrence_id": "r:conserved_reservoir_flux_balancing:b014_a11_c7", "unit": {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P014-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O4", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O4", "O7"], ["O1", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O3", "O4", "O6"], ["O1", "O3", "O4", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must apply to a model limited to one of the two named pure approaches.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The subject is a pure model of a conserved-flow system.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may use this model branch only if the model is limited to network-flow optimization.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A complete model-type branch is a pure network-flow optimization.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may use this model branch only if the model is limited to conservation accounting.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A complete model-type branch is a pure conservation ledger.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the counterfactual omission relation rather than assert a current observed omission.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The selected pure model would omit the selected reservoir-system capability.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may use this omission branch only if the model would miss stock accumulation or depletion dynamics.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "A complete omission branch is that stock dynamics would be omitted.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may use this omission branch only if the model would miss network or reservoir topology.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "A complete omission branch is that topology would be omitted.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may use this omission branch only if the model would miss intervention-relevant control levers.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "A complete omission branch is that actionable control levers would be omitted.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A pure network-flow optimization or pure conservation ledger would omit stock dynamics, topology, or actionable control levers.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "a pure flow or ledger model would omit a reservoir-system capability", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P014-C07-U1"}}]}
{"archetype": {"name": "Constituent Diversity and Interaction Rule Complexity as Emergence Driver", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:constituent_diversity_and_interaction_rule_complexity_as_emergence_driver", "slug": "constituent_diversity_and_interaction_rule_complexity_as_emergence_driver"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system needs novel, adaptive, or self-organizing aggregate behavior, but the designer cannot directly command that behavior. The available levers are the types of constituents included, the differences among them, the channels through which they interact, and the local rules that govern exchange, recombination, competition, cooperation, and feedback.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system needs novel, adaptive, or self-organizing aggregate behavior, but the designer cannot directly command that behavior. The available levers are the types of constituents included, the differences among them, the channels through which they interact, and the local rules that govern exchange, recombination, competition, cooperation, and feedback."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires multiple functionally distinct types whose different responses distribute capacity and broaden coverage.", "role_mapping": "Distinct types -> constituent differences; functional variation -> roles/capabilities/behavior.", "slug": "diversity", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b014_a12_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Constituents differ or can be made to differ in roles, capabilities, information, incentives, resources, perspectives, behaviors, or constraints. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Constituents differ or can be made to differ in roles, capabilities, information, incentives, resources, perspectives, behaviors, or constraints."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Diversity", "one_liner": "Maintaining functionally distinct types within a system so that variation provides resilience and coverage that uniformity cannot.", "page_ref": "prime:diversity", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Distinct types -> constituent differences; functional variation -> roles/capabilities/behavior.", "slug": "diversity", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires multiple functionally distinct types whose different responses distribute capacity and broaden coverage."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Constituents differ or can be made to differ in roles, capabilities, information, incentives, resources, perspectives, behaviors, or constraints.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a qualitatively novel aggregate property generated by lower-level local interactions and absent from each constituent alone.", "role_mapping": "Constituents -> lower level; interactions -> local rules; aggregate pattern -> emergent property.", "slug": "emergence", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b014_a12_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The pattern depends on interactions among constituents, not only on the independent quality of each constituent. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The pattern depends on interactions among constituents, not only on the independent quality of each constituent."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Emergence", "one_liner": "Complex patterns from simple rules.", "page_ref": "prime:emergence", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Constituents -> lower level; interactions -> local rules; aggregate pattern -> emergent property.", "slug": "emergence", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a qualitatively novel aggregate property generated by lower-level local interactions and absent from each constituent alone."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The higher-level pattern is generated by interactions among constituents rather than by any constituent independently.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A diverse system can be present without any prior homogeneous system or brittle outcome.", "slug": "diversity"}], "residual_id": "r:constituent_diversity_and_interaction_rule_complexity_as_emergence_driver:b014_a12_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b014_a12_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A purely homogeneous group, monoculture, standardized design, or centralized decision rule is producing stale, brittle, or low-novelty outcomes. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A purely homogeneous group, monoculture, standardized design, or centralized decision rule is producing stale, brittle, or low-novelty outcomes."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A diverse system can be present without any prior homogeneous system or brittle outcome.", "slug": "diversity"}], "normalized_requirement": "A homogeneous group, monoculture, standardized design, or central rule produces stale, brittle, or low-novelty outcomes.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A homogeneous group, monoculture, standardized design, or central rule produces stale, brittle, or low-novelty outcomes.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Desired outcomes are emergent, distributed, combinatorial, or adaptive rather than directly specifiable as a linear procedure.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system needs novel, adaptive, or self-organizing aggregate behavior, but the designer cannot directly command that behavior. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: Desired outcomes are emergent, distributed, combinatorial, or adaptive rather than directly specifiable as a linear procedure. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Desired outcomes are emergent, distributed, combinatorial, or adaptive rather than directly specifiable as a linear procedure.", "A system needs novel, adaptive, or self-organizing aggregate behavior, but the designer cannot directly command that behavior."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "Desired outcomes are emergent, distributed, combinatorial, or adaptive rather than directly specifiable as a linear procedure."}, {"display_text": "Interaction rules can be specified, loosened, tightened, sequenced, simulated, or sandboxed.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: Interaction rules can be specified, loosened, tightened, sequenced, simulated, or sandboxed. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Interaction rules can be specified, loosened, tightened, sequenced, simulated, or sandboxed."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Interaction rules can be specified, loosened, tightened, sequenced, simulated, or sandboxed."}, {"display_text": "The system has enough observability to detect aggregate patterns, positive surprises, harmful cascades, and rule-induced pathologies.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The design problem is to preserve enough diversity and interaction richness to generate new patterns while imposing enough boundary, feedback, and constraint to keep the pattern observable, useful, and safe. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: The system has enough observability to detect aggregate patterns, positive surprises, harmful cascades, and rule-induced pathologies. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The system has enough observability to detect aggregate patterns, positive surprises, harmful cascades, and rule-induced pathologies.", "The design problem is to preserve enough diversity and interaction richness to generate new patterns while imposing enough boundary, feedback, and constraint to keep the pattern observable, useful, and safe."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The system has enough observability to detect aggregate patterns, positive surprises, harmful cascades, and rule-induced pathologies."}, {"display_text": "The stakes allow experimentation, piloting, simulation, or reversible deployment before broad adoption.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: The stakes allow experimentation, piloting, simulation, or reversible deployment before broad adoption. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The stakes allow experimentation, piloting, simulation, or reversible deployment before broad adoption."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "The stakes allow experimentation, piloting, simulation, or reversible deployment before broad adoption."}, {"display_text": "There is a need to balance creativity, resilience, discovery, or adaptation against coherence, safety, cost, and coordination load.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this deployment constraint: There is a need to balance creativity, resilience, discovery, or adaptation against coherence, safety, cost, and coordination load. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["There is a need to balance creativity, resilience, discovery, or adaptation against coherence, safety, cost, and coordination load."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 8, "text": "There is a need to balance creativity, resilience, discovery, or adaptation against coherence, safety, cost, and coordination load."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 14, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-014", "ledger_sha256": "afcbe7f8d1296dc9682196060fa10f97ca465fd762e770f71066b732b13c3098"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Constitutive Act Governance", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:constitutive_act_governance", "slug": "constitutive_act_governance"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 3, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A word, declaration, ritual, vote, signature, classification, label, announcement, model output, or formal act is treated as if it merely describes a state, while in practice it creates or changes the state that others must recognize. If the constitutive force is ungoverned, reality-shaping power can become ambiguous, unauthorized, undocumented, coercive, exclusionary, hard to reverse, or mistakenly treated as neutral description.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A word, declaration, ritual, vote, signature, classification, label, announcement, model output, or formal act is treated as if it merely describes a state, while in practice it creates or changes the state that others must recognize. If the constitutive force is ungoverned, reality-shaping power can become ambiguous, unauthorized, undocumented, coercive, exclusionary, hard to reverse, or mistakenly treated as neutral description."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P014-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include a formal institutional act rather than an informal gesture or description.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A declaration, decision, label, signature, vote, certification, classification, ritual, or comparable act is formal.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must target an institutional or normative state capable of becoming operative.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The target is a status, obligation, membership, boundary, permission, or comparable institutional state.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve intention and need not require that the constitutive attempt succeeds.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The formal act is intended to make the target state operative.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must map the act toward making the state operative rather than reporting a pre-existing state.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The intended effect is constitutive operation of the target state, not mere description of it.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "A formal act is intended to make an institutional status, obligation, membership, boundary, permission, or comparable state operative.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "a formal act is intended to make an institutional state operative", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P014-C08-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime also includes self-fulfilling descriptions and informal social gestures outside the enumerated formal acts and operative status types.", "slug": "performativity"}], "residual_id": "r:constitutive_act_governance:b014_a13_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b014_a13_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A word, declaration, ritual, vote, signature, classification, label, announcement, model output, or formal act is treated as if it merely describes a state, while in practice it creates or changes the state that others must recognize. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A formal declaration, decision, label, signature, vote, certification, classification, or ritual is intended to make a status, obligation, membership, boundary, or permission operative.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A formal declaration, decision, label, signature, vote, certification, classification, or ritual is intended to make a status, obligation, membership, boundary, or permission operative.", "A word, declaration, ritual, vote, signature, classification, label, announcement, model output, or formal act is treated as if it merely describes a state, while in practice it creates or changes the state that others must recognize."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A proposed complete candidate instance that falsifies the selected source branch conflicts with the candidate's exact defining roles or relation.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Field Boundary Marker", "one_liner": "Route a paper, person, or proposal to the right expert community by committing a labeled research-field category at decision time — bundling a named field, a membership convention, and a routing use — that holds operationally while staying silent on what the work 'really' is.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:field_boundary_marker", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "field_boundary_marker"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "field_boundary_marker", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P014-C08-U1", "why_it_fits": "Attaching the boundary marker is constitutive rather than descriptive: it formally establishes where an institutional data field begins or ends for consuming systems."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A proposed complete candidate instance that falsifies the selected source branch conflicts with the candidate's exact defining roles or relation.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Preferred label", "one_liner": "Among the many surface forms that could name one concept, have a vocabulary authority choose, declare, and protect exactly one per language as the form the vocabulary speaks in its own voice, demoting the rest to aliases recognized at input but suppressed at output.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:canonical_label", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "canonical_label"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "canonical_label", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P014-C08-U1", "why_it_fits": "A canonical-label designation formally constitutes the preferred label that institutional users and systems are to apply."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A proposed complete candidate instance that falsifies the selected source branch conflicts with the candidate's exact defining roles or relation.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Schema Mapping Relation", "one_liner": "Bridge two independently governed classification schemes with an explicit, typed assertion — source concept, target concept, and a fidelity grade (exact / close / broader / narrower / related) — so consumers know exactly what the bridge guarantees without merging the schemes.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:schema_mapping_relation", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "schema_mapping_relation"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "schema_mapping_relation", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P014-C08-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact mapping relation is a formal constitutive assertion intended to make a cross-schema correspondence operational."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A proposed complete candidate instance that falsifies the selected source branch conflicts with the candidate's exact defining roles or relation.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Preferred Term", "one_liner": "The single authorized form a stewarding body designates as the canonical label for a concept in a controlled vocabulary — with every synonym, abbreviation, and variant retained as a non-preferred entry that routes to it, so new indexing must use one form and any variant a searcher enters reaches the same record.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:preferred_term", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "preferred_term"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "preferred_term", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P014-C08-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact designation constitutes which controlled-vocabulary label is institutionally preferred rather than merely reporting usage."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A proposed complete candidate instance that falsifies the selected source branch conflicts with the candidate's exact defining roles or relation.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Textual Definition", "one_liner": "Attach to a term in a controlled vocabulary a stable natural-language statement of the conditions under which it is correctly applied, converting a privately-interpreted label into a publicly consultable boundary that serves as the appeal of last resort in annotation disputes.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:textual_definition", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "textual_definition"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "textual_definition", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P014-C08-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact attached definition is a constitutive normative act: it establishes a publicly consultable application boundary intended to govern annotation."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A proposed complete candidate instance that falsifies the selected source branch conflicts with the candidate's exact defining roles or relation.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Declared Equivalence Mapping", "one_liner": "An explicit, authoritative, versioned assertion that two concepts from different vocabularies are interchangeable for stated purposes — collapsing a cross-scheme distinction to zero for consumers who trust the declaration rather than re-verifying at use-time.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:declared_equivalence_mapping", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "declared_equivalence_mapping"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "declared_equivalence_mapping", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P014-C08-U1", "why_it_fits": "The mapping formally constitutes declared equivalence so systems may treat distinct identifiers as the same institutional object."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A proposed complete candidate instance that falsifies the selected source branch conflicts with the candidate's exact defining roles or relation.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Authority Record", "one_liner": "Fix one governed identity per entity in a curated registry — preferred label, variant set, disambiguating notes, and a persistent identifier — so every catalog entry cites it rather than re-spelling the name, and one edit propagates everywhere.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:authority_record", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "authority_record"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "authority_record", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P014-C08-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record constitutes an actor's institutional authority and is intended to govern who may validly act."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A formal declaration, decision, label, signature, vote, certification, classification, or ritual is intended to make a status, obligation, membership, boundary, or permission operative.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires collective uptake of the act to bring about and sustain the constituted social fact.", "role_mapping": "Public assertion -> act; collective uptake -> changed behavior; named state -> constituted fact.", "slug": "performativity", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b014_a13_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A community, market, organization, court, platform, or institution changes behavior because a named state has been publicly asserted or recorded. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A community, market, organization, court, platform, or institution changes behavior because a named state has been publicly asserted or recorded."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Performativity", "one_liner": "Utterances and acts that constitute the very reality they name.", "page_ref": "prime:performativity", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Public assertion -> act; collective uptake -> changed behavior; named state -> constituted fact.", "slug": "performativity", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires collective uptake of the act to bring about and sustain the constituted social fact."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A community or institution changes behavior because a named state has been publicly asserted or recorded.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's felicity conditions gate world-making force on authority, procedure, convention, and uptake.", "role_mapping": "Recognized role/procedure -> felicity conditions; force -> constituted status.", "slug": "performativity", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b014_a13_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: An act has force only if performed by a recognized office, role, authority, quorum, procedure, or ritual body. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["An act has force only if performed by a recognized office, role, authority, quorum, procedure, or ritual body."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Performativity", "one_liner": "Utterances and acts that constitute the very reality they name.", "page_ref": "prime:performativity", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Recognized role/procedure -> felicity conditions; force -> constituted status.", "slug": "performativity", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's felicity conditions gate world-making force on authority, procedure, convention, and uptake."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The act has force only when performed by a recognized authority, office, quorum, procedure, or ritual body.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P014-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include a declared state rather than an informal expectation alone.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A state has been declared and is available for people to rely on.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail actual reliance rather than possible or intended reliance.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "People rely on the declared state.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the concessive coexistence of reliance and unclarity.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Reliance persists despite an unclear governance dimension.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only if authority or standing for the declared state is unclear.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A complete branch is that the declaration's standing is unclear.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only if the state or declaration has unclear scope.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "A complete branch is that the declaration's scope is unclear.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only if who is affected by the state is unclear.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "A complete branch is that the affected parties are unclear.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only if conditions for undoing the state are unclear.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "A complete branch is that reversal conditions are unclear.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "People rely on a declared state even though its standing, scope, affected parties, or reversal conditions are unclear.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "people rely on a declared state despite unclear governance", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P014-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A felicitous performative act can have fully clear standing, scope, affected parties, and reversal rules.", "slug": "performativity"}], "residual_id": "r:constitutive_act_governance:b014_a13_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b014_a13_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: People rely on a declared state even though standing, scope, affected parties, or reversal conditions are unclear. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["People rely on a declared state even though standing, scope, affected parties, or reversal conditions are unclear."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Without the qualifier a complete candidate instance can miss O1, but with the atomic qualifier the exact spine entails the selected branch.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_BRIDGE", "name": "Rules-of-Engagement Ambiguity", "one_liner": "Diagnose frontline breakdown under time pressure as a grain mismatch — decision rules written coarser than the environment generates choice points — paid out of a finite discretion budget, relocating the fix from the operator's judgment to the rule, escalation path, and pre-positioned authority.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:rules_of_engagement_ambiguity", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "TYPE_SUBSUMPTION", "kind": "INTERPRETIVE_BRIDGE", "normalized_key": "authorization_boundary_is_declared_state", "predicate": "a formal authorization boundary is a declared institutional state", "rationale": "The qualifier is single, minimal, candidate-anchored, and fills only the listed contingent gap while preserving the exact structural spine."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "rules_of_engagement_ambiguity"}, {"kind": "INTERPRETIVE_BRIDGE", "value": "a formal authorization boundary is a declared institutional state"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "rules_of_engagement_ambiguity", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P014-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record supplies reliance under scope ambiguity, and the single general type bridge classifies an already named formal authorization boundary as a declared institutional state."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "People rely on the declared state although standing, scope, affected parties, or reversal conditions are unclear.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P014-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include a descriptive, classificatory, or measurement device and its claimed target.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A model, index, rating, category, policy label, public metric, or comparable device claims to measure or represent a reality.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail a reflexive causal effect on the represented target, not merely measurement error.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The device causally reshapes the reality it claims to measure.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve onset timing rather than only an established long-running effect.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The reshaping effect is beginning or newly emerging.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "A descriptive or classificatory device begins to reshape the same reality it claims to measure.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "a measurement or classification begins reshaping its target reality", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P014-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Self-fulfilling descriptions are one subtype; institutional declarations and status-conferring acts need not involve a model, index, rating, or metric.", "slug": "performativity"}], "residual_id": "r:constitutive_act_governance:b014_a13_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b014_a13_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A word, declaration, ritual, vote, signature, classification, label, announcement, model output, or formal act is treated as if it merely describes a state, while in practice it creates or changes the state that others must recognize. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A model, index, rating, category, policy label, or public metric begins to reshape the reality it claims to measure.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A model, index, rating, category, policy label, or public metric begins to reshape the reality it claims to measure.", "A word, declaration, ritual, vote, signature, classification, label, announcement, model output, or formal act is treated as if it merely describes a state, while in practice it creates or changes the state that others must recognize."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Without the qualifier a complete candidate instance can miss O3, but with the atomic qualifier the exact spine entails the selected branch.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Surrogation", "one_liner": "Explain why a well-designed metric drifts from its purpose even absent any gaming: under load an accountable manager mentally replaces the strategic construct with its measure, treating the number as the thing itself rather than a partial proxy for it.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:surrogation", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O3"], "guard_type": "TIMING_BINDING", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "metric_reshaping_just_begun", "predicate": "the metric's reshaping effect has just begun", "rationale": "The qualifier is single, minimal, candidate-anchored, and fills only the listed contingent gap while preserving the exact structural spine."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "surrogation"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "the metric's reshaping effect has just begun"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "surrogation", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P014-C10-U1", "why_it_fits": "Surrogation necessarily supplies reflexive measurement causality, but it may be mature; the atomic timing guard selects the just-begun instance."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Without the qualifier a complete candidate instance can miss O3, but with the atomic qualifier the exact spine entails the selected branch.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Vanity-Metric Addiction", "one_liner": "A team locks onto a metric chosen for how impressive it looks rather than its causal link to the outcome, then keeps it after the disconnect is known because dropping it carries social cost.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:vanity_metric_addiction", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O3"], "guard_type": "TIMING_BINDING", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "vanity_metric_reshaping_just_begun", "predicate": "the vanity metric's reshaping effect has just begun", "rationale": "The qualifier is single, minimal, candidate-anchored, and fills only the listed contingent gap while preserving the exact structural spine."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "vanity_metric_addiction"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "the vanity metric's reshaping effect has just begun"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "vanity_metric_addiction", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P014-C10-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact addiction loop supplies causal reshaping by a proxy, while one timing fact is needed to select the beginning phase."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_SYNTHESIS", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Without the qualifier a complete candidate instance can miss O3, but with the atomic qualifier the exact spine entails the selected branch.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "McNamara fallacy", "one_liner": "The decision-making error in which the measurable progressively displaces the important through a four-step ratchet — measure the measurable, arbitrary-value the rest, presume it unimportant, then declare it nonexistent — until an institution optimizes a proxy while its true objective silently drifts away.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:mcnamara_fallacy", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O3"], "guard_type": "TIMING_BINDING", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "institution_just_begun_treating_unmeasured_unimportant", "predicate": "the institution has just begun treating the unmeasured as unimportant", "rationale": "The qualifier is single, minimal, candidate-anchored, and fills only the listed contingent gap while preserving the exact structural spine."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "mcnamara_fallacy"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "the institution has just begun treating the unmeasured as unimportant"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "mcnamara_fallacy", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P014-C10-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact ratchet supplies representation and reflexive reshaping, but a complete instance can be entrenched; this candidate-anchored timing guard selects its onset."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A model, index, rating, category, policy label, or public metric begins to reshape the reality it claims to measure.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P014-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must begin with an intention that is not yet binding.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An informal intent is the source state of a transition.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the directed change from informal intention to binding status.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The transition makes the informal intent into a binding state.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail necessity of the selected channel rather than optional accompaniment.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The transition requires one of the named institutionalizing channels.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only if ceremony is necessary for the transition.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A complete branch is that ceremony is required.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only if a record is necessary for the transition.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "A complete branch is that a record is required.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only if consent is necessary for the transition.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "A complete branch is that consent is required.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only if institutional recognition is necessary for the transition.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "A complete branch is that institutional recognition is required.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A transition from informal intent to a binding state requires ceremony, a record, consent, or institutional recognition.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "informal intent becomes binding only through a recognized channel", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P014-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime need not begin with informal intention or create a binding state through one of the listed channels.", "slug": "performativity"}], "residual_id": "r:constitutive_act_governance:b014_a13_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b014_a13_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Performative acts compress meaning, authority, timing, recognition, and consequence into a single moment; that compression makes them efficient for creating order, but dangerous when standing, uptake, record, or legitimacy is assumed rather than governed. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A transition from informal intent to binding state requires ceremony, record, consent, or institutional recognition.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A transition from informal intent to binding state requires ceremony, record, consent, or institutional recognition.", "Performative acts compress meaning, authority, timing, recognition, and consequence into a single moment; that compression makes them efficient for creating order, but dangerous when standing, uptake, record, or legitimacy is assumed rather than governed."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime need not begin with informal intention or create a binding state through one of the listed channels.", "slug": "performativity"}], "normalized_requirement": "A transition from informal intent to binding state requires ceremony, record, consent, or institutional recognition.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A transition from informal intent to binding state requires ceremony, record, consent, or institutional recognition.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Harm can arise if the wrong actor, wrong context, wrong words, wrong audience, or wrong record makes a state appear valid.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Performative acts compress meaning, authority, timing, recognition, and consequence into a single moment; that compression makes them efficient for creating order, but dangerous when standing, uptake, record, or legitimacy is assumed rather than governed. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Harm can arise if the wrong actor, wrong context, wrong words, wrong audience, or wrong record makes a state appear valid. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Harm can arise if the wrong actor, wrong context, wrong words, wrong audience, or wrong record makes a state appear valid.", "Performative acts compress meaning, authority, timing, recognition, and consequence into a single moment; that compression makes them efficient for creating order, but dangerous when standing, uptake, record, or legitimacy is assumed rather than governed."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "Harm can arise if the wrong actor, wrong context, wrong words, wrong audience, or wrong record makes a state appear valid."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 14, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-014", "ledger_sha256": "afcbe7f8d1296dc9682196060fa10f97ca465fd762e770f71066b732b13c3098"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Constrained Resource Allocation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:constrained_resource_allocation", "slug": "constrained_resource_allocation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is **scarcity plus ambiguity**. A limited resource has more possible uses than it can satisfy, but the system has not made explicit how to compare those uses or which constraints define feasibility. In that state, allocation tends to default to precedent, political force, urgency theater, equal spreading, or whoever owns the budget line.\n\nThe result is often a technically familiar but structurally unstable pattern: high-priority work lacks resources, low-yield commitments continue because they are inherited, constraints are discovered after implementation starts, and stakeholders cannot tell whether the chosen allocation serves the stated goal.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A scarce resource has multiple possible uses and real constraints, but allocation is ad hoc, historically inherited, politically pressured, or misaligned with the stated objective."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires bounded supply to fall short of competing rivalrous demands, forcing allocation.", "role_mapping": "Bounded supply -> resource pool; competing wants -> demands; insufficiency -> shortage.", "slug": "scarcity", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b014_a14_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Demand exceeds available resources. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Demand exceeds available resources."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Scarcity", "one_liner": "A finite resource is insufficient to satisfy all competing wants.", "page_ref": "prime:scarcity", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Bounded supply -> resource pool; competing wants -> demands; insufficiency -> shortage.", "slug": "scarcity", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires bounded supply to fall short of competing rivalrous demands, forcing allocation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Finite resource supply is insufficient for all competing demands.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Assigning resources need not have a measured outcome or stated objective.", "slug": "allocation"}], "residual_id": "r:constrained_resource_allocation:b014_a14_c2", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b014_a14_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Allocation decisions affect measurable outcomes. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Allocation decisions affect measurable outcomes."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Assigning resources need not have a measured outcome or stated objective.", "slug": "allocation"}], "normalized_requirement": "Allocation choices affect measurable downstream outcomes.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Allocation choices affect measurable downstream outcomes.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires an explicit checkable condition partitioning a candidate domain into admissible and inadmissible configurations.", "role_mapping": "Candidate allocations -> domain; legal/physical/etc. rule -> constraint; feasible set -> allowed allocations.", "slug": "constraint", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b014_a14_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A limited resource has more possible uses than it can satisfy, but the system has not made explicit how to compare those uses or which constraints define feasibility. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Constraints define what is legally, physically, ethically, or operationally possible.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Constraints define what is legally, physically, ethically, or operationally possible.", "A limited resource has more possible uses than it can satisfy, but the system has not made explicit how to compare those uses or which constraints define feasibility."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Constraint", "one_liner": "Limits possibilities to guide outcomes.", "page_ref": "prime:constraint", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Candidate allocations -> domain; legal/physical/etc. rule -> constraint; feasible set -> allowed allocations.", "slug": "constraint", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires an explicit checkable condition partitioning a candidate domain into admissible and inadmissible configurations."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Constraints define what is legally, physically, ethically, or operationally possible.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P014-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern a legacy or inherited allocation rather than a newly chosen allocation.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A resource allocation is inherited or legacy.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the temporal comparison between a legacy allocation and current goals without requiring a separate change in conditions or objectives.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The inherited allocation is assessed against the current-goal baseline.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail current goal misalignment rather than mere historical origin.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The inherited allocation does not match the current goals.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "An inherited resource allocation no longer matches the system's current goals.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "an inherited allocation is misaligned with current goals", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P014-C13-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An allocation can be current and objective-aligned rather than inherited or stale.", "slug": "allocation"}], "residual_id": "r:constrained_resource_allocation:b014_a14_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b014_a14_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Legacy allocation no longer matches current goals. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Legacy allocation no longer matches current goals."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An allocation can be current and objective-aligned rather than inherited or stale.", "slug": "allocation"}], "normalized_requirement": "Inherited allocation no longer matches current goals.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Inherited allocation no longer matches current goals.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Scarcity requires competing demands but not multiple stakeholders with normatively incompatible claims.", "slug": "scarcity"}], "residual_id": "r:constrained_resource_allocation:b014_a14_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b014_a14_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A scarce resource has multiple possible uses and real constraints, but allocation is ad hoc, historically inherited, politically pressured, or misaligned with the stated objective. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Multiple stakeholders make incompatible claims on the same resource pool.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Multiple stakeholders make incompatible claims on the same resource pool.", "A scarce resource has multiple possible uses and real constraints, but allocation is ad hoc, historically inherited, politically pressured, or misaligned with the stated objective."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Scarcity requires competing demands but not multiple stakeholders with normatively incompatible claims.", "slug": "scarcity"}], "normalized_requirement": "Multiple stakeholders make incompatible claims on the same resource pool.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Multiple stakeholders make incompatible claims on the same resource pool.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 14, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-014", "ledger_sha256": "afcbe7f8d1296dc9682196060fa10f97ca465fd762e770f71066b732b13c3098"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Constraint Envelope Adjustment", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:constraint_envelope_adjustment", "slug": "constraint_envelope_adjustment"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 1 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 1}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The current feasible action envelope is misplaced, too broad, too narrow, or outdated relative to system viability.", "explanation_source": {"field": "diagnostic_head", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "The current feasible action envelope is misplaced, too broad, too narrow, or outdated relative to system viability."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "This branch preserves the complete remedy-free diagnostic route; goals, feasibility clauses, gates, deployment constraints, and supporting context remain outside the DNF."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "EXT001-C021", "dnf": [["EXT001-U021-O1"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"obligation_id": "EXT001-U021-O1", "predicate": "The current constraint envelope permits harmful freedom, suppresses necessary adaptation, concentrates risk, wastes capacity, or blocks effective action."}], "predicate": "The current constraint envelope permits harmful freedom, suppresses necessary adaptation, concentrates risk, wastes capacity, or blocks effective action.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "The current constraint envelope permits harmful freedom, suppresses necessary adaptation, concentrates risk, wastes capacity, or blocks effective action.", "unit_id": "EXT001-U021"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"catalog_exhaustion": "CONDITION_LEVEL", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The current constraint envelope permits harmful freedom, suppresses necessary adaptation, concentrates risk, wastes capacity, or blocks effective action.", "slug": "credible_commitment"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The current constraint envelope permits harmful freedom, suppresses necessary adaptation, concentrates risk, wastes capacity, or blocks effective action.", "slug": "compellence"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The current constraint envelope permits harmful freedom, suppresses necessary adaptation, concentrates risk, wastes capacity, or blocks effective action.", "slug": "escape_and_leakage"}], "residual_id": "EXT001:constraint_envelope_adjustment:C01", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding."}}, "condition_id": "ext001_constraint_envelope_adjustment_a01", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored essence_one_line, compression_statement, components fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: The current constraint envelope permits harmful freedom, suppresses necessary adaptation, concentrates risk, wastes capacity, or blocks effective action.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The current constraint envelope permits harmful freedom, suppresses necessary adaptation, concentrates risk, wastes capacity, or blocks effective action."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The current constraint envelope permits harmful freedom, suppresses necessary adaptation, concentrates risk, wastes capacity, or blocks effective action.", "slug": "credible_commitment"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The current constraint envelope permits harmful freedom, suppresses necessary adaptation, concentrates risk, wastes capacity, or blocks effective action.", "slug": "compellence"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The current constraint envelope permits harmful freedom, suppresses necessary adaptation, concentrates risk, wastes capacity, or blocks effective action.", "slug": "escape_and_leakage"}], "normalized_requirement": "The current constraint envelope permits harmful freedom, suppresses necessary adaptation, concentrates risk, wastes capacity, or blocks effective action.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The current constraint envelope permits harmful freedom, suppresses necessary adaptation, concentrates risk, wastes capacity, or blocks effective action.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The relevant constraints can be distinguished from preferences and altered by legitimate authority.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored essence_one_line, compression_statement, components fields; the source file was not modified. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: The relevant constraints can be distinguished from preferences and altered by legitimate authority. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The relevant constraints can be distinguished from preferences and altered by legitimate authority.", "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored essence_one_line, compression_statement, components fields; the source file was not modified."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "The relevant constraints can be distinguished from preferences and altered by legitimate authority."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"candidate_ledger_sha256": "96f72d2139077fd57bf795048ebef33b3fd574b20963170080ec916b5b3b92fe", "extension_id": "new-archetypes-extension-001", "ledger_id": "prime-production-v1.2-extension-001", "ledger_sha256": "9644520614744632d1d36da44b1acd77ce432852c6083eb871203521c166efce"}, "base_projection_sha256": "841e0c7f3cb8e8054475ad29a8a14745a416b4fc115559a44878b94292e673ec", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "ca09ed9fe1598ce7072755b530de5553f5ee0a7cd64ae82d9e4a4e2149a37788", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Constraint Formulation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:constraint_formulation", "slug": "constraint_formulation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 5, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is ambiguous feasibility. Actors are working in a decision space without a shared definition of what counts as allowed, possible, acceptable, or negotiable. The result is wasted exploration, late rejection, inconsistent enforcement, and hidden tradeoffs.\n\nThis is not just a communication issue. A constraint changes the structure of the problem: it partitions options into feasible, infeasible, conditionally feasible, or feasible-but-penalized categories. Until that partition is visible, downstream mechanisms such as optimization, checklists, policy review, and acceptance testing can produce misleading confidence.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Actors generate or choose options without clearly knowing which limits, requirements, or prohibitions define feasibility."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P014-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include active generation of possible options.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Actors generate candidate options.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require absent explicit feasibility criteria at the relevant time.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The conditions that define option feasibility are not yet explicit.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the stated event order rather than mere co-occurrence.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Option generation occurs before explicit formulation of the feasibility conditions.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "Actors generate options before the conditions that determine feasibility are explicit.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "option generation precedes explicit feasibility conditions", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P014-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A constraint is already an explicit condition defining feasibility and has the opposite state.", "slug": "constraint"}], "residual_id": "r:constraint_formulation:b014_a15_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b014_a15_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Options are being generated before feasibility conditions are explicit. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Options are being generated before feasibility conditions are explicit."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A constraint is already an explicit condition defining feasibility and has the opposite state.", "slug": "constraint"}], "normalized_requirement": "Options are generated before feasibility conditions are explicit.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Options are generated before feasibility conditions are explicit.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P014-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must involve multiple stakeholders and requirements under classification.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Two or more stakeholders classify requirements.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail actual disagreement rather than mere independent preferences.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The stakeholders disagree about the classifications.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the mandatory-versus-preference distinction as the subject of disagreement.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The disputed classification is whether a requirement is mandatory or merely preferred.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Stakeholders disagree about which requirements are mandatory constraints and which are merely preferences.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "stakeholders disagree over mandatory constraints versus preferences", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P014-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A constraint formally separates admissibility from preference and need not be disputed.", "slug": "constraint"}], "residual_id": "r:constraint_formulation:b014_a15_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b014_a15_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Stakeholders disagree about what is mandatory versus merely preferred. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders disagree about what is mandatory versus merely preferred."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A constraint formally separates admissibility from preference and need not be disputed.", "slug": "constraint"}], "normalized_requirement": "Stakeholders disagree which requirements are mandatory and which are preferences.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Stakeholders disagree which requirements are mandatory and which are preferences.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime requires an explicit checkable condition, not an informal mention.", "slug": "constraint"}], "residual_id": "r:constraint_formulation:b014_a15_c3", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b014_a15_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Legal, safety, compatibility, or resource limits are mentioned informally. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Legal, safety, compatibility, or resource limits are mentioned informally."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime requires an explicit checkable condition, not an informal mention.", "slug": "constraint"}], "normalized_requirement": "Legal, safety, compatibility, or resource limits are mentioned only informally.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Legal, safety, compatibility, or resource limits are mentioned only informally.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A constraint can operate on a small finite domain and does not entail prior search infeasibility.", "slug": "constraint"}], "residual_id": "r:constraint_formulation:b014_a15_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b014_a15_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The search space is too broad or unbounded for practical decision-making. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The search space is too broad or unbounded for practical decision-making."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A constraint can operate on a small finite domain and does not entail prior search infeasibility.", "slug": "constraint"}], "normalized_requirement": "The unconstrained search space is too broad or unbounded for practical choice.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The unconstrained search space is too broad or unbounded for practical choice.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A constraint can be universally enforced with no exception or violation.", "slug": "constraint"}], "residual_id": "r:constraint_formulation:b014_a15_c5", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b014_a15_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Exceptions or violations are likely. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Exceptions or violations are likely."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A constraint can be universally enforced with no exception or violation.", "slug": "constraint"}], "normalized_requirement": "Exceptions or violations of the eventual feasibility rules are likely.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Exceptions or violations of the eventual feasibility rules are likely.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A solver, workflow, policy, or review process needs a formal feasible set.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when stakeholders disagree about what is mandatory, when legal or safety restrictions matter, when a model or review process needs a defined feasible set, or when late infeasibility would be expensive. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: A solver, workflow, policy, or review process needs a formal feasible set. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A solver, workflow, policy, or review process needs a formal feasible set.", "It is especially useful when stakeholders disagree about what is mandatory, when legal or safety restrictions matter, when a model or review process needs a defined feasible set, or when late infeasibility would be expensive."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "A solver, workflow, policy, or review process needs a formal feasible set."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 14, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-014", "ledger_sha256": "afcbe7f8d1296dc9682196060fa10f97ca465fd762e770f71066b732b13c3098"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Constraint-Guided Backtracking", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:constraint_guided_backtracking", "slug": "constraint_guided_backtracking"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A problem is being solved through a sequence of interdependent choices, but feasibility cannot be known from any single choice in isolation. Greedy commitment may trap the solver in a dead branch, exhaustive restart wastes valid work, and broad pruning may be unsafe because the exact reason a branch fails is discovered only after partial construction.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A problem is being solved through a sequence of interdependent choices, but feasibility cannot be known from any single choice in isolation. Greedy commitment may trap the solver in a dead branch, exhaustive restart wastes valid work, and broad pruning may be unsafe because the exact reason a branch fails is discovered only after partial construction."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires incremental construction of an inspectable partial solution along a decision tree with recorded choice points.", "role_mapping": "Partial solution -> represented sequence/tree/path; commitment -> next element.", "slug": "backtracking", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b015_a01_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The candidate solution can be represented as a sequence, tree, partial assignment, path, plan, or hypothesis chain. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The candidate solution can be represented as a sequence, tree, partial assignment, path, plan, or hypothesis chain."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Backtracking", "one_liner": "Extend a partial solution one step at a time and reverse the most recent commitment as soon as a constraint proves it cannot succeed, preserving earlier work.", "page_ref": "prime:backtracking", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Partial solution -> represented sequence/tree/path; commitment -> next element.", "slug": "backtracking", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires incremental construction of an inspectable partial solution along a decision tree with recorded choice points."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The candidate solution can be represented as a sequence, tree, partial assignment, path, plan, or hypothesis chain.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires an early constraint check that prunes an infeasible prefix before enumerating its completions.", "role_mapping": "Constraint check -> invalidation rule; prefix -> partial path; pruning -> before completion.", "slug": "backtracking", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b015_a01_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Constraints, dependencies, evidence, or compatibility rules can invalidate a partial path before a full solution is reached. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Constraints, dependencies, evidence, or compatibility rules can invalidate a partial path before a full solution is reached."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Backtracking", "one_liner": "Extend a partial solution one step at a time and reverse the most recent commitment as soon as a constraint proves it cannot succeed, preserving earlier work.", "page_ref": "prime:backtracking", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Constraint check -> invalidation rule; prefix -> partial path; pruning -> before completion.", "slug": "backtracking", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires an early constraint check that prunes an infeasible prefix before enumerating its completions."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Constraints, dependencies, evidence, or compatibility rules can invalidate a partial path before a full solution is reached.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's recency-and-locality rollback reverses only the newest failed commitment and preserves earlier work.", "role_mapping": "Earlier prefix -> preserved state; newest commitment -> local rollback target.", "slug": "backtracking", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b015_a01_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Effective progress requires making tentative choices, but those choices must remain reversible until enough constraints have been satisfied. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Earlier choices may remain valid even when the newest extension fails.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Earlier choices may remain valid even when the newest extension fails.", "Effective progress requires making tentative choices, but those choices must remain reversible until enough constraints have been satisfied."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Backtracking", "one_liner": "Extend a partial solution one step at a time and reverse the most recent commitment as soon as a constraint proves it cannot succeed, preserving earlier work.", "page_ref": "prime:backtracking", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Earlier prefix -> preserved state; newest commitment -> local rollback target.", "slug": "backtracking", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's recency-and-locality rollback reverses only the newest failed commitment and preserves earlier work."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Earlier choices may remain valid even when the newest extension fails.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The search space is too large for blind enumeration but not structured enough for one-shot optimization.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The search space is too large for blind enumeration but not structured enough for one-shot optimization. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The search space is too large for blind enumeration but not structured enough for one-shot optimization."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The search space is too large for blind enumeration but not structured enough for one-shot optimization."}, {"display_text": "Greedy local choice is tempting but cannot guarantee feasibility or adequacy.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A problem is being solved through a sequence of interdependent choices, but feasibility cannot be known from any single choice in isolation. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Greedy local choice is tempting but cannot guarantee feasibility or adequacy. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Greedy local choice is tempting but cannot guarantee feasibility or adequacy.", "A problem is being solved through a sequence of interdependent choices, but feasibility cannot be known from any single choice in isolation."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Greedy local choice is tempting but cannot guarantee feasibility or adequacy."}, {"display_text": "Rollback is cheaper, safer, or more informative than restarting the entire process.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: Rollback is cheaper, safer, or more informative than restarting the entire process. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Rollback is cheaper, safer, or more informative than restarting the entire process."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Rollback is cheaper, safer, or more informative than restarting the entire process."}, {"display_text": "The domain needs an auditable record of which branches were tried and why they failed.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The domain needs an auditable record of which branches were tried and why they failed. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The domain needs an auditable record of which branches were tried and why they failed."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "The domain needs an auditable record of which branches were tried and why they failed."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 15, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-015", "ledger_sha256": "f3dccf9f9194276c661a1b78f55638ecfb2c3f59ead920bf666db358fb303904"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": [{"groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "No complete candidate instance preserving the exact record and any stated guard can falsify the selected complete DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Means-End Analysis", "one_liner": "A greedy problem-solving heuristic that repeatedly finds the most significant difference between the current and goal states, applies the operator that most reduces it, and recurses on any unmet preconditions as sub-goals.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:means_end_analysis", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "means_end_analysis"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "means_end_analysis", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P015-C01-U2", "why_it_fits": "Every means-end instance makes a locally greedy no-lookahead operator choice, while the exact negative boundary denies a guaranteed solution; this entails the feasibility branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A complete instance lacking the guarded fact remains possible, confirming exactly one bounded gap.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Search Algorithm", "one_liner": "Solve a problem by casting it as a state space explored with a frontier-ordering strategy, so completeness, optimality, and cost are read off the strategy's name — and an admissible heuristic buys a narrower search without sacrificing the optimal answer.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:search_algorithm", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1", "O2", "O3"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "strategy_is_hill_climbing", "predicate": "the exploration strategy is hill climbing", "rationale": "The authoritative expression preserves the candidate spine, and one anchored atomic context fact fills every surviving branch gap without adding a principal role."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "search_algorithm"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "strategy_is_hill_climbing"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "search_algorithm", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P015-C01-U2", "why_it_fits": "The exact taxonomy names hill climbing as a local-search branch; selecting that one branch makes the local greediness and lack of feasibility guarantee necessary."}], "publication_role": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT_ONLY", "source_residual_occurrence_id": "r:constraint_guided_backtracking:b015_a01_c5", "unit": {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P015-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern a locally greedy choice rather than a globally evaluated decision.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A choice is made greedily from locally available considerations.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must deny a guarantee, not merely say that the outcome is uncertain or difficult to assess.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The local choice does not guarantee the relevant broader outcome.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only if global or eventual feasibility is not guaranteed by the local choice.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A complete branch is that the local choice cannot guarantee feasibility.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only if global or eventual adequacy is not guaranteed by the local choice.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A complete branch is that the local choice cannot guarantee adequacy.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A greedy local choice cannot guarantee feasibility or adequacy.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "a greedy local choice cannot guarantee global feasibility or adequacy", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P015-C01-U2"}}]}
{"archetype": {"name": "Constraint-Guided Improvisation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:constraint_guided_improvisation", "slug": "constraint_guided_improvisation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 2 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 2}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A changing situation requires action before a complete plan can be written or centrally approved. Existing scripts cover only part of the state space, information is distributed or delayed, and competent local adaptation is necessary. Yet unconstrained deviation can create safety violations, coordination collisions, incoherence, inequity, authority creep, and unreviewed precedent.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A changing situation requires action before a complete plan can be written or centrally approved. Existing scripts cover only part of the state space, information is distributed or delayed, and competent local adaptation is necessary. Yet unconstrained deviation can create safety violations, coordination collisions, incoherence, inequity, authority creep, and unreviewed precedent."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires generation in response to a developing state perceived during performance rather than fully specified beforehand.", "role_mapping": "Developing state -> relevant state; in-performance perception -> not fully available in advance.", "slug": "improvisation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b015_a02_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The relevant state cannot be fully predicted or observed in advance. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The relevant state cannot be fully predicted or observed in advance."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Improvisation", "one_liner": "Real-time generation of competent moves from an internalized vocabulary, against a backbone of constraint, in response to the developing situation.", "page_ref": "prime:improvisation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Developing state -> relevant state; in-performance perception -> not fully available in advance.", "slug": "improvisation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires generation in response to a developing state perceived during performance rather than fully specified beforehand."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The relevant state cannot be fully predicted or observed in advance.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a deep internalized vocabulary of small patterns that can be selected and recombined in real time.", "role_mapping": "Actor -> skilled performer; repertoire -> internalized vocabulary; recombination -> generated move.", "slug": "improvisation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b015_a02_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Actors possess practiced tacit or explicit repertoire that can be recombined. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Actors possess practiced tacit or explicit repertoire that can be recombined."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Improvisation", "one_liner": "Real-time generation of competent moves from an internalized vocabulary, against a backbone of constraint, in response to the developing situation.", "page_ref": "prime:improvisation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Actor -> skilled performer; repertoire -> internalized vocabulary; recombination -> generated move.", "slug": "improvisation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a deep internalized vocabulary of small patterns that can be selected and recombined in real time."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Actors possess practiced tacit or explicit repertoire that can be recombined.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The environment changes faster than a detailed script can be updated.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The environment changes faster than a detailed script can be updated. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The environment changes faster than a detailed script can be updated."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "The environment changes faster than a detailed script can be updated."}, {"display_text": "Delay, repeated escalation, or rigid script adherence has meaningful cost.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Existing scripts cover only part of the state space, information is distributed or delayed, and competent local adaptation is necessary. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Delay, repeated escalation, or rigid script adherence has meaningful cost. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Delay, repeated escalation, or rigid script adherence has meaningful cost.", "Existing scripts cover only part of the state space, information is distributed or delayed, and competent local adaptation is necessary."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Delay, repeated escalation, or rigid script adherence has meaningful cost."}, {"display_text": "A stable purpose, constraint backbone, and stop or handoff path can be stated.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: A stable purpose, constraint backbone, and stop or handoff path can be stated. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A stable purpose, constraint backbone, and stop or handoff path can be stated."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "A stable purpose, constraint backbone, and stop or handoff path can be stated."}, {"display_text": "Feedback from local moves arrives soon enough to inform subsequent action.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: Feedback from local moves arrives soon enough to inform subsequent action. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Feedback from local moves arrives soon enough to inform subsequent action."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Feedback from local moves arrives soon enough to inform subsequent action."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 15, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-015", "ledger_sha256": "f3dccf9f9194276c661a1b78f55638ecfb2c3f59ead920bf666db358fb303904"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Constraint Propagation and Decoupling", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:constraint_propagation_and_decoupling", "slug": "constraint_propagation_and_decoupling"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 4, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 2, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 4 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A coupled system is being solved at the wrong level of entanglement. Constraints exist, but their implications have not been pushed through the system. As a result, people or solvers search infeasible regions, work on redundant options, split problems at unjustified boundaries, or discover global contradictions only after local solutions have been produced.\n\nThe recurring tension is that global constraints matter, but global solving may be intractable. Local solving is efficient, but only safe when independence has been earned by propagation and recomposition checks.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system, model, schedule, design space, supply network, or rule set is treated as one coupled problem because constraints have not been propagated. Teams or solvers either attempt the whole problem at once, split it prematurely, or repeatedly rediscover conflicts. The result is excess complexity, hidden infeasibility, duplicated work, and local solutions that fail when recombined."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A single explicit admissibility condition need not couple multiple variables, constraints, or subsystems.", "slug": "constraint"}], "residual_id": "r:constraint_propagation_and_decoupling:b015_a03_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b015_a03_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Multiple constraints bind variables, resources, actors, tasks, decisions, states, or subsystems together. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Multiple constraints bind variables, resources, actors, tasks, decisions, states, or subsystems together."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A single explicit admissibility condition need not couple multiple variables, constraints, or subsystems.", "slug": "constraint"}], "normalized_requirement": "Multiple constraints bind variables, resources, actors, tasks, decisions, states, or subsystems together.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Multiple constraints bind variables, resources, actors, tasks, decisions, states, or subsystems together.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P015-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include a constraint capable of restricting choices in a larger decision structure.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A final condition, invariant, deadline, conservation rule, compatibility rule, capacity limit, or comparable governing constraint applies.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the one-to-many reach of the constraint.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The constraint has implications for many choices, not only one isolated choice.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only if implications propagate to many earlier or antecedent choices.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A complete branch is that the constraint has implications for many upstream choices.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only if implications propagate to many later or consequent choices.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A complete branch is that the constraint has implications for many downstream choices.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A governing constraint has implications for many upstream or downstream choices.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "a governing constraint constrains many choices across the decision structure", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P015-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A constraint can partition a local domain without propagating implications across many other choices.", "slug": "constraint"}], "residual_id": "r:constraint_propagation_and_decoupling:b015_a03_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b015_a03_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when deadlines, capacities, compatibility rules, physical equations, legal constraints, conservation rules, invariants, or gauge freedoms shape many local choices. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A final condition, invariant, deadline, conservation rule, compatibility rule, or capacity limit has implications for many upstream or downstream choices.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A final condition, invariant, deadline, conservation rule, compatibility rule, or capacity limit has implications for many upstream or downstream choices.", "It is especially useful when deadlines, capacities, compatibility rules, physical equations, legal constraints, conservation rules, invariants, or gauge freedoms shape many local choices."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A complete instance lacking the guarded fact remains possible, confirming exactly one bounded gap.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Dependency Hell", "one_liner": "The pathological state where a project's transitive dependency closure holds mutually incompatible version constraints, turning installation into an NP-complete constraint-satisfaction problem that no edge-level patch can resolve.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:dependency_hell", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2"], "guard_type": "QUANTIFIER_BINDING", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "many_affected_version_assignments", "predicate": "the affected version-assignment set contains many choices", "rationale": "The authoritative expression preserves the candidate spine, and one anchored atomic context fact fills every surviving branch gap without adding a principal role."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "dependency_hell"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "many_affected_version_assignments"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "dependency_hell", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P015-C03-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record supplies directed transitive constraint propagation; one quantifier fact binds the affected choice set as many."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A final condition, invariant, deadline, conservation rule, compatibility rule, or capacity limit has implications for many upstream or downstream choices.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P015-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include more than one agent whose work must proceed locally.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Multiple teams, solvers, or comparable agents need to work on local subproblems.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include boundaries whose independence could govern distributed local work.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Candidate boundaries divide the larger problem into local regions or subproblems.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail the absence of a defensible independence account, not merely incomplete documentation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "No participant can justify which candidate boundaries are independent.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern boundaries that are safe to treat independently, not arbitrary organizational divisions.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The required independence is safety-preserving.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Multiple teams or solvers must work locally, but no one can justify which boundaries are safely independent.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "local work is required without justified safe-independence boundaries", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P015-C05-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A logistics decoupling point can be explicitly placed and need not involve unjustified team or solver boundaries.", "slug": "decoupling_point"}], "residual_id": "r:constraint_propagation_and_decoupling:b015_a03_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b015_a03_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "As a result, people or solvers search infeasible regions, work on redundant options, split problems at unjustified boundaries, or discover global contradictions only after local solutions have been produced. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Different teams or solvers need to work locally, but no one can justify which boundaries are safely independent.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Different teams or solvers need to work locally, but no one can justify which boundaries are safely independent.", "As a result, people or solvers search infeasible regions, work on redundant options, split problems at unjustified boundaries, or discover global contradictions only after local solutions have been produced."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_SYNTHESIS", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Without the qualifier, one maintainer can face the same unbounded local-change graph; with the required multiple local teams, every obligation is forced.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Spaghetti Code", "one_liner": "Diagnose a codebase as unmaintainable by reading its dependency graph: when boundary-violating edges accumulate past a threshold, the cost of any local change scales with the whole system rather than the unit being changed.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:spaghetti_code", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "QUANTIFIER_BINDING", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "maintenance_requires_multiple_local_teams", "predicate": "the maintenance work requires multiple maintainer teams to own local units", "rationale": "The authoritative expression preserves the candidate spine, and one anchored atomic context fact fills every surviving branch gap without adding a principal role."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "spaghetti_code"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "maintenance_requires_multiple_local_teams"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "spaghetti_code", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P015-C05-U1", "why_it_fits": "Spaghetti code supplies candidate local boundaries whose dependency violations destroy safe change isolation; one quantified necessity fact binds the existing maintainer role to the required multiple local teams."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Different teams or solvers need to work locally, but no one can justify which boundaries are safely independent.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A single explicit admissibility condition need not couple multiple variables, constraints, or subsystems.", "slug": "constraint"}], "residual_id": "r:constraint_propagation_and_decoupling:b015_a03_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b015_a03_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Multiple constraints bind variables, resources, actors, tasks, decisions, states, or subsystems together. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Multiple constraints bind variables, resources, actors, tasks, decisions, states, or subsystems together."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A single explicit admissibility condition need not couple multiple variables, constraints, or subsystems.", "slug": "constraint"}], "normalized_requirement": "Multiple constraints bind variables, resources, actors, tasks, decisions, states, or subsystems together.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Multiple constraints bind variables, resources, actors, tasks, decisions, states, or subsystems together.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P015-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include a constraint capable of restricting choices in a larger decision structure.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A final condition, invariant, deadline, conservation rule, compatibility rule, capacity limit, or comparable governing constraint applies.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the one-to-many reach of the constraint.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The constraint has implications for many choices, not only one isolated choice.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only if implications propagate to many earlier or antecedent choices.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A complete branch is that the constraint has implications for many upstream choices.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only if implications propagate to many later or consequent choices.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A complete branch is that the constraint has implications for many downstream choices.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A governing constraint has implications for many upstream or downstream choices.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "a governing constraint constrains many choices across the decision structure", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P015-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A constraint can partition a local domain without propagating implications across many other choices.", "slug": "constraint"}], "residual_id": "r:constraint_propagation_and_decoupling:b015_a03_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b015_a03_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when deadlines, capacities, compatibility rules, physical equations, legal constraints, conservation rules, invariants, or gauge freedoms shape many local choices. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A final condition, invariant, deadline, conservation rule, compatibility rule, or capacity limit has implications for many upstream or downstream choices.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A final condition, invariant, deadline, conservation rule, compatibility rule, or capacity limit has implications for many upstream or downstream choices.", "It is especially useful when deadlines, capacities, compatibility rules, physical equations, legal constraints, conservation rules, invariants, or gauge freedoms shape many local choices."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A complete instance lacking the guarded fact remains possible, confirming exactly one bounded gap.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Dependency Hell", "one_liner": "The pathological state where a project's transitive dependency closure holds mutually incompatible version constraints, turning installation into an NP-complete constraint-satisfaction problem that no edge-level patch can resolve.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:dependency_hell", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2"], "guard_type": "QUANTIFIER_BINDING", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "many_affected_version_assignments", "predicate": "the affected version-assignment set contains many choices", "rationale": "The authoritative expression preserves the candidate spine, and one anchored atomic context fact fills every surviving branch gap without adding a principal role."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "dependency_hell"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "many_affected_version_assignments"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "dependency_hell", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P015-C03-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record supplies directed transitive constraint propagation; one quantifier fact binds the affected choice set as many."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A final condition, invariant, deadline, conservation rule, compatibility rule, or capacity limit has implications for many upstream or downstream choices.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P015-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include completed solutions developed for local subproblems.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Local subproblem solutions are produced.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include a violation of a constraint relevant beyond an isolated local solution.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A constraint violation affecting the larger problem becomes apparent.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the late discovery order rather than simultaneous or preventive detection.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The constraint violation appears after the local subproblem solutions have already been produced.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "Constraint violations appear only after local subproblem solutions have already been produced.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "constraint violations are detected after local solutions are produced", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P015-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Backtracking detects failure during one incremental search and does not require independently completed local subproblems.", "slug": "backtracking"}], "residual_id": "r:constraint_propagation_and_decoupling:b015_a03_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b015_a03_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "As a result, people or solvers search infeasible regions, work on redundant options, split problems at unjustified boundaries, or discover global contradictions only after local solutions have been produced. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Constraint violations appear late, after local subproblem solutions have already been produced.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Constraint violations appear late, after local subproblem solutions have already been produced.", "As a result, people or solvers search infeasible regions, work on redundant options, split problems at unjustified boundaries, or discover global contradictions only after local solutions have been produced."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Backtracking detects failure during one incremental search and does not require independently completed local subproblems.", "slug": "backtracking"}], "normalized_requirement": "Constraint violations appear late, after local subproblem solutions have already been produced.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Constraint violations appear late, after local subproblem solutions have already been produced.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A single explicit admissibility condition need not couple multiple variables, constraints, or subsystems.", "slug": "constraint"}], "residual_id": "r:constraint_propagation_and_decoupling:b015_a03_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b015_a03_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Multiple constraints bind variables, resources, actors, tasks, decisions, states, or subsystems together. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Multiple constraints bind variables, resources, actors, tasks, decisions, states, or subsystems together."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A single explicit admissibility condition need not couple multiple variables, constraints, or subsystems.", "slug": "constraint"}], "normalized_requirement": "Multiple constraints bind variables, resources, actors, tasks, decisions, states, or subsystems together.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Multiple constraints bind variables, resources, actors, tasks, decisions, states, or subsystems together.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P015-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include a constraint capable of restricting choices in a larger decision structure.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A final condition, invariant, deadline, conservation rule, compatibility rule, capacity limit, or comparable governing constraint applies.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the one-to-many reach of the constraint.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The constraint has implications for many choices, not only one isolated choice.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only if implications propagate to many earlier or antecedent choices.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A complete branch is that the constraint has implications for many upstream choices.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only if implications propagate to many later or consequent choices.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A complete branch is that the constraint has implications for many downstream choices.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A governing constraint has implications for many upstream or downstream choices.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "a governing constraint constrains many choices across the decision structure", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P015-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A constraint can partition a local domain without propagating implications across many other choices.", "slug": "constraint"}], "residual_id": "r:constraint_propagation_and_decoupling:b015_a03_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b015_a03_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when deadlines, capacities, compatibility rules, physical equations, legal constraints, conservation rules, invariants, or gauge freedoms shape many local choices. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A final condition, invariant, deadline, conservation rule, compatibility rule, or capacity limit has implications for many upstream or downstream choices.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A final condition, invariant, deadline, conservation rule, compatibility rule, or capacity limit has implications for many upstream or downstream choices.", "It is especially useful when deadlines, capacities, compatibility rules, physical equations, legal constraints, conservation rules, invariants, or gauge freedoms shape many local choices."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A complete instance lacking the guarded fact remains possible, confirming exactly one bounded gap.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Dependency Hell", "one_liner": "The pathological state where a project's transitive dependency closure holds mutually incompatible version constraints, turning installation into an NP-complete constraint-satisfaction problem that no edge-level patch can resolve.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:dependency_hell", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2"], "guard_type": "QUANTIFIER_BINDING", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "many_affected_version_assignments", "predicate": "the affected version-assignment set contains many choices", "rationale": "The authoritative expression preserves the candidate spine, and one anchored atomic context fact fills every surviving branch gap without adding a principal role."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "dependency_hell"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "many_affected_version_assignments"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "dependency_hell", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P015-C03-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record supplies directed transitive constraint propagation; one quantifier fact binds the affected choice set as many."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A final condition, invariant, deadline, conservation rule, compatibility rule, or capacity limit has implications for many upstream or downstream choices.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Decomposition can be exact and safe when interfaces are correctly defined; it does not entail a hidden cross-boundary dependency.", "slug": "decomposition"}], "residual_id": "r:constraint_propagation_and_decoupling:b015_a03_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b015_a03_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when a problem is too coupled or combinatorial to solve as a whole, but naive decomposition would be unsafe. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The system contains cycles, shared resources, compatibility exclusions, or boundary conditions that make naive decomposition unsafe.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The system contains cycles, shared resources, compatibility exclusions, or boundary conditions that make naive decomposition unsafe.", "Use this archetype when a problem is too coupled or combinatorial to solve as a whole, but naive decomposition would be unsafe."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Decomposition can be exact and safe when interfaces are correctly defined; it does not entail a hidden cross-boundary dependency.", "slug": "decomposition"}], "normalized_requirement": "The system contains cycles, shared resources, compatibility exclusions, or boundary conditions that make naive decomposition unsafe.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The system contains cycles, shared resources, compatibility exclusions, or boundary conditions that make naive decomposition unsafe.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P015-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include a constraint capable of restricting choices in a larger decision structure.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A final condition, invariant, deadline, conservation rule, compatibility rule, capacity limit, or comparable governing constraint applies.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the one-to-many reach of the constraint.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The constraint has implications for many choices, not only one isolated choice.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only if implications propagate to many earlier or antecedent choices.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A complete branch is that the constraint has implications for many upstream choices.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only if implications propagate to many later or consequent choices.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A complete branch is that the constraint has implications for many downstream choices.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A governing constraint has implications for many upstream or downstream choices.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "a governing constraint constrains many choices across the decision structure", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P015-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A constraint can partition a local domain without propagating implications across many other choices.", "slug": "constraint"}], "residual_id": "r:constraint_propagation_and_decoupling:b015_a03_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b015_a03_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when deadlines, capacities, compatibility rules, physical equations, legal constraints, conservation rules, invariants, or gauge freedoms shape many local choices. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A final condition, invariant, deadline, conservation rule, compatibility rule, or capacity limit has implications for many upstream or downstream choices.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A final condition, invariant, deadline, conservation rule, compatibility rule, or capacity limit has implications for many upstream or downstream choices.", "It is especially useful when deadlines, capacities, compatibility rules, physical equations, legal constraints, conservation rules, invariants, or gauge freedoms shape many local choices."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A complete instance lacking the guarded fact remains possible, confirming exactly one bounded gap.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Dependency Hell", "one_liner": "The pathological state where a project's transitive dependency closure holds mutually incompatible version constraints, turning installation into an NP-complete constraint-satisfaction problem that no edge-level patch can resolve.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:dependency_hell", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2"], "guard_type": "QUANTIFIER_BINDING", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "many_affected_version_assignments", "predicate": "the affected version-assignment set contains many choices", "rationale": "The authoritative expression preserves the candidate spine, and one anchored atomic context fact fills every surviving branch gap without adding a principal role."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "dependency_hell"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "many_affected_version_assignments"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "dependency_hell", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P015-C03-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record supplies directed transitive constraint propagation; one quantifier fact binds the affected choice set as many."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A final condition, invariant, deadline, conservation rule, compatibility rule, or capacity limit has implications for many upstream or downstream choices.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P015-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include an apparent choice space or parameter space.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A system presents a set of apparent degrees of freedom or available choices.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must relate apparent freedom to redundancy or outcome-equivalence within the choice space.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "That apparent choice space includes options that are not substantively distinct with respect to the relevant invariant outcomes.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve outcome invariance across at least some apparent choices; representational redundancy and equivalent parameterization are manifestations, not mandatory role restrictions.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "At least some apparent choices do not change the relevant invariant outcomes.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "The apparent degrees of freedom include choices that are representationally redundant, parametrically equivalent, or irrelevant to invariant outcomes.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "apparent degrees of freedom include outcome-equivalent choices", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P015-C04-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Degrees of freedom counts independent parameters; it does not require apparent choices to be redundant or gauge-equivalent.", "slug": "degrees_of_freedom"}], "residual_id": "r:constraint_propagation_and_decoupling:b015_a03_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b015_a03_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when deadlines, capacities, compatibility rules, physical equations, legal constraints, conservation rules, invariants, or gauge freedoms shape many local choices. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The apparent degrees of freedom include redundant representational choices, equivalent parameterizations, or choices that do not affect invariant outcomes.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The apparent degrees of freedom include redundant representational choices, equivalent parameterizations, or choices that do not affect invariant outcomes.", "It is especially useful when deadlines, capacities, compatibility rules, physical equations, legal constraints, conservation rules, invariants, or gauge freedoms shape many local choices."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Degrees of freedom counts independent parameters; it does not require apparent choices to be redundant or gauge-equivalent.", "slug": "degrees_of_freedom"}], "normalized_requirement": "The apparent degrees of freedom include redundant representational choices, equivalent parameterizations, or choices that do not affect invariant outcomes.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The apparent degrees of freedom include redundant representational choices, equivalent parameterizations, or choices that do not affect invariant outcomes.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 15, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-015", "ledger_sha256": "f3dccf9f9194276c661a1b78f55638ecfb2c3f59ead920bf666db358fb303904"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Construct–Proxy–Signal Validity Alignment", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:construct_proxy_signal_validity_alignment", "slug": "construct_proxy_signal_validity_alignment"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 2, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 2, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 2 of 2 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A measurement procedure produces a legible signal, but the system treats that signal as if it directly captured a theoretical construct. The proxy may be correlated with the construct, easier to measure, more familiar, more rewarded, or historically convenient, yet it may actually reflect an adjacent construct, sampling artifact, method effect, context-specific behavior, incentive response, or operational surrogate. Decisions then inherit unwarranted confidence from the appearance of measurement.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A measurement procedure produces a legible signal, but the system treats that signal as if it directly captured a theoretical construct. The proxy may be correlated with the construct, easier to measure, more familiar, more rewarded, or historically convenient, yet it may actually reflect an adjacent construct, sampling artifact, method effect, context-specific behavior, incentive response, or operational surrogate. Decisions then inherit unwarranted confidence from the appearance of measurement."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a theoretical target construct that is not directly observable and must be approached through an operationalization and signal.", "role_mapping": "Construct -> latent target; signal -> observable evidence.", "slug": "construct_validity", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime requires an unobservable or costly target that an observable stand-in is used to infer or act upon.", "role_mapping": "Target -> construct or quality; proxy -> observable evidence.", "slug": "proxy_target_fidelity", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b015_a04_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Measurement needs reduction: an abstract construct must be made observable through a proxy and a signal. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A theoretical construct, capability, quality, need, value, risk, outcome, trait, state, or latent variable must be inferred from observable evidence.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A theoretical construct, capability, quality, need, value, risk, outcome, trait, state, or latent variable must be inferred from observable evidence.", "Measurement needs reduction: an abstract construct must be made observable through a proxy and a signal."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Construct Validity", "one_liner": "Whether a measurement procedure actually captures the theoretical construct it claims to, rather than a correlated but distinct surrogate, across a three-layer construct-proxy-signal gap.", "page_ref": "prime:construct_validity", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Construct -> latent target; signal -> observable evidence.", "slug": "construct_validity", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a theoretical target construct that is not directly observable and must be approached through an operationalization and signal."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Proxy–Target Fidelity", "one_liner": "How faithfully an observable proxy tracks the unobservable target it stands in for — the degree to which acting on, optimizing, or inferring from the proxy is acting on the target itself.", "page_ref": "prime:proxy_target_fidelity", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Target -> construct or quality; proxy -> observable evidence.", "slug": "proxy_target_fidelity", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires an unobservable or costly target that an observable stand-in is used to infer or act upon."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A theoretical construct, capability, quality, need, value, risk, outcome, trait, state, or latent variable must be inferred from observable evidence.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires an operationalized observable proxy and the actual signal emitted by the instrument.", "role_mapping": "Listed measurement -> proxy or signal; theoretical quantity -> construct.", "slug": "construct_validity", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime requires an observable, measurable, or actionable stand-in such as a score, biomarker, index, metric, or benchmark.", "role_mapping": "Listed measure -> proxy; intended quantity -> target.", "slug": "proxy_target_fidelity", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b015_a04_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Measurement needs reduction: an abstract construct must be made observable through a proxy and a signal. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The available measurement is a proxy, score, test, survey item, behavioral trace, biomarker, sensor signal, rating, benchmark, or aggregate metric.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The available measurement is a proxy, score, test, survey item, behavioral trace, biomarker, sensor signal, rating, benchmark, or aggregate metric.", "Measurement needs reduction: an abstract construct must be made observable through a proxy and a signal."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Construct Validity", "one_liner": "Whether a measurement procedure actually captures the theoretical construct it claims to, rather than a correlated but distinct surrogate, across a three-layer construct-proxy-signal gap.", "page_ref": "prime:construct_validity", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Listed measurement -> proxy or signal; theoretical quantity -> construct.", "slug": "construct_validity", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires an operationalized observable proxy and the actual signal emitted by the instrument."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Proxy–Target Fidelity", "one_liner": "How faithfully an observable proxy tracks the unobservable target it stands in for — the degree to which acting on, optimizing, or inferring from the proxy is acting on the target itself.", "page_ref": "prime:proxy_target_fidelity", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Listed measure -> proxy; intended quantity -> target.", "slug": "proxy_target_fidelity", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires an observable, measurable, or actionable stand-in such as a score, biomarker, index, metric, or benchmark."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The available measurement is a proxy, score, test, survey item, behavioral trace, biomarker, sensor signal, rating, benchmark, or aggregate metric.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a construct-level interpretation of the produced signal and probes whether that inferential bridge is warranted.", "role_mapping": "Signal description -> produced value; listed claim -> construct interpretation.", "slug": "construct_validity", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime requires an appointed proxy-for-target relation for a definite decision, inference, reward, or optimization use.", "role_mapping": "Claim/use -> designation purpose; raw signal -> proxy.", "slug": "proxy_target_fidelity", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b015_a04_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Measurement needs reduction: an abstract construct must be made observable through a proxy and a signal. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A claim is being made beyond raw signal description: diagnosis, certification, ranking, funding, optimization, policy action, model evaluation, or scientific inference.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A claim is being made beyond raw signal description: diagnosis, certification, ranking, funding, optimization, policy action, model evaluation, or scientific inference.", "Measurement needs reduction: an abstract construct must be made observable through a proxy and a signal."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Construct Validity", "one_liner": "Whether a measurement procedure actually captures the theoretical construct it claims to, rather than a correlated but distinct surrogate, across a three-layer construct-proxy-signal gap.", "page_ref": "prime:construct_validity", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Signal description -> produced value; listed claim -> construct interpretation.", "slug": "construct_validity", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a construct-level interpretation of the produced signal and probes whether that inferential bridge is warranted."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Proxy–Target Fidelity", "one_liner": "How faithfully an observable proxy tracks the unobservable target it stands in for — the degree to which acting on, optimizing, or inferring from the proxy is acting on the target itself.", "page_ref": "prime:proxy_target_fidelity", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Claim/use -> designation purpose; raw signal -> proxy.", "slug": "proxy_target_fidelity", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires an appointed proxy-for-target relation for a definite decision, inference, reward, or optimization use."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A claim is being made beyond raw signal description: diagnosis, certification, ranking, funding, optimization, policy action, model evaluation, or scientific inference.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires binding optimization pressure on a proxy to recruit effort into the construct-proxy wedge and collapse their correlation.", "role_mapping": "Metric/signal -> proxy; intended construct -> target; optimization/gaming -> effort reallocation.", "slug": "goodharts_law", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b015_a04_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Measurement needs reduction: an abstract construct must be made observable through a proxy and a signal. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Optimization pressure, Goodhart effects, gaming, training-to-the-test, or metric substitution could decouple the signal from the construct.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Optimization pressure, Goodhart effects, gaming, training-to-the-test, or metric substitution could decouple the signal from the construct.", "Measurement needs reduction: an abstract construct must be made observable through a proxy and a signal."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Goodhart's Law", "one_liner": "When a proxy is placed under binding optimization pressure, its correlation with the construct it was meant to indicate collapses.", "page_ref": "prime:goodharts_law", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Metric/signal -> proxy; intended construct -> target; optimization/gaming -> effort reallocation.", "slug": "goodharts_law", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires binding optimization pressure on a proxy to recruit effort into the construct-proxy wedge and collapse their correlation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Optimization pressure, Goodhart effects, gaming, training-to-the-test, or metric substitution could decouple the signal from the construct.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The proxy may be merely correlated with the target construct or may capture only one facet of a multidimensional construct.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Measurement needs reduction: an abstract construct must be made observable through a proxy and a signal. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The proxy may be merely correlated with the target construct or may capture only one facet of a multidimensional construct. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The proxy may be merely correlated with the target construct or may capture only one facet of a multidimensional construct.", "Measurement needs reduction: an abstract construct must be made observable through a proxy and a signal."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The proxy may be merely correlated with the target construct or may capture only one facet of a multidimensional construct."}, {"display_text": "Different populations, contexts, instruments, incentives, or time periods may change what the signal means.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "But every reduction risks substituting what is easy to observe for what the construct actually means. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Different populations, contexts, instruments, incentives, or time periods may change what the signal means. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Different populations, contexts, instruments, incentives, or time periods may change what the signal means.", "But every reduction risks substituting what is easy to observe for what the construct actually means."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Different populations, contexts, instruments, incentives, or time periods may change what the signal means."}, {"display_text": "A measurement is about to be used in a higher-stakes setting than the evidence originally supported.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: A measurement is about to be used in a higher-stakes setting than the evidence originally supported. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A measurement is about to be used in a higher-stakes setting than the evidence originally supported."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "A measurement is about to be used in a higher-stakes setting than the evidence originally supported."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 15, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-015", "ledger_sha256": "f3dccf9f9194276c661a1b78f55638ecfb2c3f59ead920bf666db358fb303904"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": [{"groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A complete instance lacking the guarded fact remains possible, confirming exactly one bounded gap.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Surrogate Endpoint Problem", "one_liner": "The failure that arises when a trial's biomarker surrogate diverges from the clinical endpoint it stands in for — because the intervention acts through off-pathway mechanisms the surrogate cannot see — so individual-level correlation does not license an intervention-level claim.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:surrogate_endpoint_problem", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2"], "guard_type": "TIMING_BINDING", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "surrogate_decision_imminent", "predicate": "a surrogate-based regulatory or treatment decision is imminent", "rationale": "The authoritative expression preserves the candidate spine, and one anchored atomic context fact fills every surviving branch gap without adding a principal role."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "surrogate_endpoint_problem"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "surrogate_decision_imminent"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "surrogate_endpoint_problem", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P015-C07-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record supplies the evidence-to-higher-stakes mismatch; one timing fact selects an imminent use."}], "publication_role": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT_ONLY", "source_residual_occurrence_id": "r:construct_proxy_signal_validity_alignment:b015_a04_c6", "unit": {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P015-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include a measurement and an evidence-supported use boundary.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A measurement has an evidence base supporting its use within some setting or stakes range.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve that the expanded use is about to occur, not merely hypothetically possible.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Use of the measurement in a new setting is imminent.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the directional increase in stakes beyond the evidence boundary.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The new setting has higher stakes than the setting or use originally supported by the evidence.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "A measurement is about to be used in a setting with higher stakes than its evidence originally supported.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "measurement use exceeds the stakes supported by its evidence", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P015-C07-U1"}}]}
{"archetype": {"name": "Context Anchor Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:context_anchor_design", "slug": "context_anchor_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 2 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 2}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is context loss. A reference that was clear inside a shared situation becomes ambiguous when copied, archived, localized, automated, escalated, or read by someone outside the original situation.\n\nThis can happen in records, where “approved” does not say who approved what under which authority. It can happen in interfaces, where “delete current item” does not name the active account or environment. It can happen in meetings, where “we agreed to move forward” does not specify who agreed, what scope was decided, or when the decision became effective.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A statement, instruction, label, control, record, or decision uses context-dependent references that become ambiguous, misleading, or unsafe when the original speaker, time, place, role, version, or situation is absent."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a deictic expression whose reference depends on speaker, addressee, time, place, or discourse position; the condition lists canonical and analogous forms.", "role_mapping": "Context-dependent word -> deictic expression; message/record -> utterance.", "slug": "deixis", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b015_a05_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Common cues include words like “current,” “here,” “now,” “owner,” “you,” “this,” “previous,” “next,” “approved,” “valid,” “local,” and “available.” The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A message or record uses words such as here, now, current, owner, you, this, previous, next, approved, live, local, valid, closed, or available.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A message or record uses words such as here, now, current, owner, you, this, previous, next, approved, live, local, valid, closed, or available.", "Common cues include words like “current,” “here,” “now,” “owner,” “you,” “this,” “previous,” “next,” “approved,” “valid,” “local,” and “available.”"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Deixis", "one_liner": "Context-dependent meaning.", "page_ref": "prime:deixis", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Context-dependent word -> deictic expression; message/record -> utterance.", "slug": "deixis", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a deictic expression whose reference depends on speaker, addressee, time, place, or discourse position; the condition lists canonical and analogous forms."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A message or record uses words such as here, now, current, owner, you, this, previous, next, approved, live, local, valid, closed, or available.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a contextual anchor tuple and extends from person, place, and time to social and discourse position.", "role_mapping": "Role/context/object -> deictic center; interpretation -> contextual resolution.", "slug": "deixis", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b015_a05_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when a statement, instruction, label, UI control, policy clause, record, ticket, or meeting note depends on context that may not be present later. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Interpretation depends on a role, jurisdiction, workflow state, version, environment, channel, selected object, or meeting context.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Interpretation depends on a role, jurisdiction, workflow state, version, environment, channel, selected object, or meeting context.", "Use this archetype when a statement, instruction, label, UI control, policy clause, record, ticket, or meeting note depends on context that may not be present later."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Deixis", "one_liner": "Context-dependent meaning.", "page_ref": "prime:deixis", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Role/context/object -> deictic center; interpretation -> contextual resolution.", "slug": "deixis", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a contextual anchor tuple and extends from person, place, and time to social and discourse position."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Interpretation depends on a role, jurisdiction, workflow state, version, environment, channel, selected object, or meeting context.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The same text, label, decision, or instruction may be read later, copied elsewhere, localized, archived, audited, escalated, or handed off.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A reference that was clear inside a shared situation becomes ambiguous when copied, archived, localized, automated, escalated, or read by someone outside the original situation. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The same text, label, decision, or instruction may be read later, copied elsewhere, localized, archived, audited, escalated, or handed off. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The same text, label, decision, or instruction may be read later, copied elsewhere, localized, archived, audited, escalated, or handed off.", "A reference that was clear inside a shared situation becomes ambiguous when copied, archived, localized, automated, escalated, or read by someone outside the original situation."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "The same text, label, decision, or instruction may be read later, copied elsewhere, localized, archived, audited, escalated, or handed off."}, {"display_text": "A document or interface assumes that readers already know who is speaking, what object is active, what time window applies, or which scope is intended.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It can happen in interfaces, where “delete current item” does not name the active account or environment. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: A document or interface assumes that readers already know who is speaking, what object is active, what time window applies, or which scope is intended. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A document or interface assumes that readers already know who is speaking, what object is active, what time window applies, or which scope is intended.", "It can happen in interfaces, where “delete current item” does not name the active account or environment."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "A document or interface assumes that readers already know who is speaking, what object is active, what time window applies, or which scope is intended."}, {"display_text": "Ambiguous reference could cause wrong action, compliance error, unsafe operation, lost accountability, or dispute about meaning.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is also useful when misinterpretation could cause unsafe action, compliance errors, accountability gaps, or expensive rework. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Ambiguous reference could cause wrong action, compliance error, unsafe operation, lost accountability, or dispute about meaning. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Ambiguous reference could cause wrong action, compliance error, unsafe operation, lost accountability, or dispute about meaning.", "It is also useful when misinterpretation could cause unsafe action, compliance errors, accountability gaps, or expensive rework."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Ambiguous reference could cause wrong action, compliance error, unsafe operation, lost accountability, or dispute about meaning."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 15, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-015", "ledger_sha256": "f3dccf9f9194276c661a1b78f55638ecfb2c3f59ead920bf666db358fb303904"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": [{"groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "No complete candidate instance preserving the exact record and any stated guard can falsify the selected complete DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Microcopy Ambiguity", "one_liner": "The HCI failure where a terse interface label admits more than one reading, so the user decompresses it against a prior different from the designer's and acts correctly on the wrong interpretation.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:microcopy_ambiguity", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O4"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "omitted_active_object_anchor", "predicate": "The ambiguous interface label omits the identity of the active object and expects the user to supply it from prior context.", "rationale": "The authoritative expression preserves the candidate spine, and one anchored atomic context fact fills every surviving branch gap without adding a principal role."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "microcopy_ambiguity"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "omitted_active_object_anchor"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "microcopy_ambiguity", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P015-C08-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact candidate supplies the interface, reader, and assumed-prior spine. One anchored branch selector—omission of active-object identity—completes one DNF branch."}], "publication_role": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT_ONLY", "source_residual_occurrence_id": "r:context_anchor_design:b015_a05_c4", "unit": {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P015-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include a communicative artifact and a reader or user audience.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A document, interface, or comparable communicative artifact is interpreted by readers.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail dependence on prior contextual knowledge, not merely the presence of contextual information.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The artifact relies on readers already knowing a context anchor rather than supplying it.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only if speaker identity is assumed to be known already.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A complete branch is that the assumed context anchor identifies who is speaking.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only if active-object identity is assumed to be known already.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A complete branch is that the assumed context anchor identifies which object is active.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only if the relevant time window is assumed to be known already.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "A complete branch is that the assumed context anchor identifies the applicable time window.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only if intended scope is assumed to be known already.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "A complete branch is that the assumed context anchor identifies the intended scope.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A document or interface assumes that readers already know a required speaker, active-object, time-window, or intended-scope context.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "a document or interface relies on an unstated context anchor", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P015-C08-U1"}}]}
{"archetype": {"name": "Context-Bounded Meaning Recovery", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:context_bounded_meaning_recovery", "slug": "context_bounded_meaning_recovery"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "An artifact, signal, statement, dataset, symbol, rule, behavior, event, or representation must be read for meaning, but different frameworks make different readings plausible. Without an explicit framework and evidence boundary, the interpretation can become projection, overreading, underreading, presentism, literalism, strategic ambiguity, or unaccountable meaning assignment.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "An artifact, signal, statement, dataset, symbol, rule, behavior, event, or representation must be read for meaning, but different frameworks make different readings plausible. Without an explicit framework and evidence boundary, the interpretation can become projection, overreading, underreading, presentism, literalism, strategic ambiguity, or unaccountable meaning assignment."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A thick record preserves interpretive material but need not itself guide any listed consequential use.", "slug": "thick_description"}], "residual_id": "r:context_bounded_meaning_recovery:b015_a06_c1", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b015_a06_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "An artifact, signal, statement, dataset, symbol, rule, behavior, event, or representation must be read for meaning, but different frameworks make different readings plausible. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A representation carries meaning that will guide belief, judgment, action, responsibility, explanation, classification, design, or enforcement.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A representation carries meaning that will guide belief, judgment, action, responsibility, explanation, classification, design, or enforcement.", "An artifact, signal, statement, dataset, symbol, rule, behavior, event, or representation must be read for meaning, but different frameworks make different readings plausible."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A thick record preserves interpretive material but need not itself guide any listed consequential use.", "slug": "thick_description"}], "normalized_requirement": "A representation carries meaning that will guide belief, judgment, action, responsibility, explanation, classification, design, or enforcement.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A representation carries meaning that will guide belief, judgment, action, responsibility, explanation, classification, design, or enforcement.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P015-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"], ["O1", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include an artifact, signal, statement, dataset, symbol, rule, behavior, event, representation, or comparable meaning-bearing substrate.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A substrate is being interpreted for meaning.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only if more than one interpretation remains plausibly supported.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A complete branch is that multiple distinct readings of the substrate are plausible.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only if different stakeholders hold conflicting interpretations of the substrate.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A complete branch is that stakeholders disagree about what the substrate means.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A substrate admits multiple plausible readings, or stakeholders disagree about its meaning.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "the meaning of a substrate is multiply plausible or disputed", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P015-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Part-whole interpretation can converge without stakeholders disagreeing or multiple readings remaining plausible.", "slug": "hermeneutic_circle"}], "residual_id": "r:context_bounded_meaning_recovery:b015_a06_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b015_a06_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "An artifact, signal, statement, dataset, symbol, rule, behavior, event, or representation must be read for meaning, but different frameworks make different readings plausible. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Multiple plausible readings exist, or stakeholders disagree about what the substrate means.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Multiple plausible readings exist, or stakeholders disagree about what the substrate means.", "An artifact, signal, statement, dataset, symbol, rule, behavior, event, or representation must be read for meaning, but different frameworks make different readings plausible."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A complete instance lacking the guarded fact remains possible, confirming exactly one bounded gap.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Narrative Gap", "one_liner": "Turn a deliberate, cued absence in a story — a withheld fact or unrendered scene the reader is meant to feel and close by inference — into an active device tuned on one knob: the gap's width and signposting.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:narrative_gap", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2"], "guard_type": "QUANTIFIER_BINDING", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "multiple_plausible_gap_hypotheses", "predicate": "two or more invited hypotheses remain plausible", "rationale": "The authoritative expression preserves the candidate spine, and one anchored atomic context fact fills every surviving branch gap without adding a principal role."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "narrative_gap"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "multiple_plausible_gap_hypotheses"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "narrative_gap", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P015-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record supplies the inference-invitation spine; one cardinality fact makes multiple hypotheses simultaneously plausible."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "No complete candidate instance preserving the exact record and any stated guard can falsify the selected complete DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Label Ambiguity", "one_liner": "Diagnose a headline accuracy figure as a blend of two measurements — model capability in the class interior where annotators agree, and mere adjudication agreement in the boundary zone where reasonable experts split — by stratifying metrics on the inter-annotator agreement rate.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:label_ambiguity", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "label_ambiguity"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "label_ambiguity", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P015-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every label-ambiguity instance has interpreters making conflicting category judgments at a fuzzy boundary, satisfying the stakeholder-disagreement branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "No complete candidate instance preserving the exact record and any stated guard can falsify the selected complete DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Microcopy Ambiguity", "one_liner": "The HCI failure where a terse interface label admits more than one reading, so the user decompresses it against a prior different from the designer's and acts correctly on the wrong interpretation.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:microcopy_ambiguity", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "microcopy_ambiguity"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "microcopy_ambiguity", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P015-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every microcopy-ambiguity instance contains a meaning-bearing interface label that admits multiple plausible user readings."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "No complete candidate instance preserving the exact record and any stated guard can falsify the selected complete DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Reader-Response", "one_liner": "Treat meaning as co-produced in the act of reading rather than fixed in the text, and locate any divergence of readings at one of three sources — the text's gaps, the reader's horizon, or the interpretive community.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:reader_response", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "reader_response"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "reader_response", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P015-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "Reader-response makes a text's meaning underdetermined and permits structured divergent readings, directly satisfying the interpretive-multiplicity branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "No complete candidate instance preserving the exact record and any stated guard can falsify the selected complete DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Empty-State Failure", "one_liner": "The interface condition in which a view has no content and provides no scaffolding for the absence — no explanation of the cause, no disambiguation among the possible causes (new, filtered, permission, loading, error), and no next action — so the user, left to infer meaning from nothing, typically concludes wrongly that the system is broken or gated.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:empty_state_failure", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "empty_state_failure"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "empty_state_failure", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P015-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "The identical blank view collapses several determinate causes, so users face multiple plausibly supported interpretations of one interface substrate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Multiple plausible readings exist, or stakeholders disagree about what the substrate means.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires meaning-determining surrounding roles, conventions, audiences, prior states, and stakes whose removal changes the event's interpretation.", "role_mapping": "Substrate/event -> focal event; listed context -> context envelope; changed meaning -> disambiguation dependency.", "slug": "thick_description", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b015_a06_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The substrate is context-dependent: genre, language, audience, period, platform, protocol, legal regime, or cultural convention changes the meaning. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The substrate is context-dependent: genre, language, audience, period, platform, protocol, legal regime, or cultural convention changes the meaning."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Thick Description", "one_liner": "Record a phenomenon together with the surrounding context that makes its meaning recoverable, not just the bare surface event.", "page_ref": "prime:thick_description", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Substrate/event -> focal event; listed context -> context envelope; changed meaning -> disambiguation dependency.", "slug": "thick_description", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires meaning-determining surrounding roles, conventions, audiences, prior states, and stakes whose removal changes the event's interpretation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The substrate is context-dependent: genre, language, audience, period, platform, protocol, legal regime, or cultural convention changes the meaning.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires an interpreter's pre-understanding or horizon to condition part-whole meaning and makes that prior frame an explicit object of revision.", "role_mapping": "Implicit framework -> fore-structure; reading -> iterative interpretation.", "slug": "hermeneutic_circle", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b015_a06_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "An artifact, signal, statement, dataset, symbol, rule, behavior, event, or representation must be read for meaning, but different frameworks make different readings plausible. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The reading depends on a framework that is usually implicit, such as a theory, schema, legal canon, domain model, design convention, or community code.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The reading depends on a framework that is usually implicit, such as a theory, schema, legal canon, domain model, design convention, or community code.", "An artifact, signal, statement, dataset, symbol, rule, behavior, event, or representation must be read for meaning, but different frameworks make different readings plausible."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Hermeneutic Circle", "one_liner": "Whole/part interpretation loop.", "page_ref": "prime:hermeneutic_circle", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Implicit framework -> fore-structure; reading -> iterative interpretation.", "slug": "hermeneutic_circle", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires an interpreter's pre-understanding or horizon to condition part-whole meaning and makes that prior frame an explicit object of revision."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The reading depends on a framework that is usually implicit, such as a theory, schema, legal canon, domain model, design convention, or community code.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A high-level claim is being made from fine-grained marks, fragments, data fields, signs, or observations.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: A high-level claim is being made from fine-grained marks, fragments, data fields, signs, or observations. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A high-level claim is being made from fine-grained marks, fragments, data fields, signs, or observations."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "A high-level claim is being made from fine-grained marks, fragments, data fields, signs, or observations."}, {"display_text": "Misinterpretation would create material cost, exclusion, wrong action, bad classification, legal error, mistranslation, or epistemic injustice.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Misinterpretation would create material cost, exclusion, wrong action, bad classification, legal error, mistranslation, or epistemic injustice. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Misinterpretation would create material cost, exclusion, wrong action, bad classification, legal error, mistranslation, or epistemic injustice."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Misinterpretation would create material cost, exclusion, wrong action, bad classification, legal error, mistranslation, or epistemic injustice."}, {"display_text": "The interpreter must distinguish what is supported, what is speculative, what is undecidable, and what belongs to a different framework.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "An artifact, signal, statement, dataset, symbol, rule, behavior, event, or representation must be read for meaning, but different frameworks make different readings plausible. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: The interpreter must distinguish what is supported, what is speculative, what is undecidable, and what belongs to a different framework. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The interpreter must distinguish what is supported, what is speculative, what is undecidable, and what belongs to a different framework.", "An artifact, signal, statement, dataset, symbol, rule, behavior, event, or representation must be read for meaning, but different frameworks make different readings plausible."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "The interpreter must distinguish what is supported, what is speculative, what is undecidable, and what belongs to a different framework."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 15, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-015", "ledger_sha256": "f3dccf9f9194276c661a1b78f55638ecfb2c3f59ead920bf666db358fb303904"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Context-Keyed Representation Switching", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:context_keyed_representation_switching", "slug": "context_keyed_representation_switching"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A shared substrate must encode and use more than one coherent representation, but the representations are context-dependent and cannot be safely collapsed into one map. Without explicit keys, isolation, and re-entry controls, one context overwrites, contaminates, or silently substitutes for another.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A shared substrate must encode and use more than one coherent representation, but the representations are context-dependent and cannot be safely collapsed into one map. Without explicit keys, isolation, and re-entry controls, one context overwrites, contaminates, or silently substitutes for another."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires multiple disjoint context-keyed representations on one substrate, so the effective correspondence changes with the selected map.", "role_mapping": "Input/location -> substrate state; valid correspondence -> active map; context -> map key.", "slug": "remapping", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b015_a07_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The same input, location, category, relationship, or action has materially different valid correspondences in different contexts. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The same input, location, category, relationship, or action has materially different valid correspondences in different contexts."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Remapping", "one_liner": "A single substrate holds multiple disjoint, context-keyed representations and switches discretely between them on a context cue, preserving inactive ones for later re-entry.", "page_ref": "prime:remapping", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Input/location -> substrate state; valid correspondence -> active map; context -> map key.", "slug": "remapping", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires multiple disjoint context-keyed representations on one substrate, so the effective correspondence changes with the selected map."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The same input, location, category, relationship, or action has materially different valid correspondences in different contexts.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P015-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include more than one representation whose applicability differs by context.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Several distinct context-specific representations are required.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require shared-substrate coexistence rather than merely permit it.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The representations must coexist on the same substrate.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only if duplication cost makes shared-substrate coexistence necessary.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A complete branch is that coexistence is required because duplicating the entire substrate is costly.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only if duplication impossibility makes shared-substrate coexistence necessary.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A complete branch is that coexistence is required because duplicating the entire substrate is impossible.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only if an adverse property of duplication makes shared-substrate coexistence necessary.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "A complete branch is that coexistence is required because duplicating the entire substrate is undesirable.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Several context-specific representations must coexist on one substrate because duplicating the substrate is costly, impossible, or undesirable.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "context-specific representations must share a non-duplicable substrate", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P015-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime requires one shared substrate but does not require cost, impossibility, or undesirability of duplicating it.", "slug": "remapping"}], "residual_id": "r:context_keyed_representation_switching:b015_a07_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b015_a07_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The design must exploit a shared substrate and any genuine invariants while preserving enough separation that each context-specific representation remains coherent, selectable, updateable, and recoverable. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Several context-specific representations must coexist on the same substrate because duplicating the entire substrate is costly, impossible, or undesirable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Several context-specific representations must coexist on the same substrate because duplicating the entire substrate is costly, impossible, or undesirable.", "The design must exploit a shared substrate and any genuine invariants while preserving enough separation that each context-specific representation remains coherent, selectable, updateable, and recoverable."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime requires one shared substrate but does not require cost, impossibility, or undesirability of duplicating it.", "slug": "remapping"}], "normalized_requirement": "Several context-specific representations must coexist on the same substrate because duplicating the entire substrate is costly, impossible, or undesirable.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Several context-specific representations must coexist on the same substrate because duplicating the entire substrate is costly, impossible, or undesirable.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires inactive maps to remain intact and recoverable when their context returns.", "role_mapping": "Prior context representation -> inactive map; recoverability -> re-entry invariant.", "slug": "remapping", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b015_a07_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The design must exploit a shared substrate and any genuine invariants while preserving enough separation that each context-specific representation remains coherent, selectable, updateable, and recoverable. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A representation used in one context must remain recoverable after other contexts have been active.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A representation used in one context must remain recoverable after other contexts have been active.", "The design must exploit a shared substrate and any genuine invariants while preserving enough separation that each context-specific representation remains coherent, selectable, updateable, and recoverable."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Remapping", "one_liner": "A single substrate holds multiple disjoint, context-keyed representations and switches discretely between them on a context cue, preserving inactive ones for later re-entry.", "page_ref": "prime:remapping", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Prior context representation -> inactive map; recoverability -> re-entry invariant.", "slug": "remapping", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires inactive maps to remain intact and recoverable when their context returns."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A representation used in one context must remain recoverable after other contexts have been active.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime definitionally selects among disjoint maps through an abrupt context-triggered switch rather than a continuous transform.", "role_mapping": "Context change -> cue; switch -> discrete gate transition.", "slug": "remapping", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b015_a07_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The design must exploit a shared substrate and any genuine invariants while preserving enough separation that each context-specific representation remains coherent, selectable, updateable, and recoverable. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Context changes are discrete enough to justify a switch rather than continuous interpolation alone.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Context changes are discrete enough to justify a switch rather than continuous interpolation alone.", "The design must exploit a shared substrate and any genuine invariants while preserving enough separation that each context-specific representation remains coherent, selectable, updateable, and recoverable."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Remapping", "one_liner": "A single substrate holds multiple disjoint, context-keyed representations and switches discretely between them on a context cue, preserving inactive ones for later re-entry.", "page_ref": "prime:remapping", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Context change -> cue; switch -> discrete gate transition.", "slug": "remapping", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime definitionally selects among disjoint maps through an abrupt context-triggered switch rather than a continuous transform."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Context changes are discrete enough to justify a switch rather than continuous interpolation alone.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Observable cues can identify context directly or support confidence-aware inference.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: Observable cues can identify context directly or support confidence-aware inference. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Observable cues can identify context directly or support confidence-aware inference."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Observable cues can identify context directly or support confidence-aware inference."}, {"display_text": "Cross-context interference, switch cost, or wrong-map activation has consequential effects.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Cross-context interference, switch cost, or wrong-map activation has consequential effects. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Cross-context interference, switch cost, or wrong-map activation has consequential effects."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Cross-context interference, switch cost, or wrong-map activation has consequential effects."}, {"display_text": "The system can expose, test, and audit which representation is active.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: The system can expose, test, and audit which representation is active. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The system can expose, test, and audit which representation is active."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "The system can expose, test, and audit which representation is active."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 15, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-015", "ledger_sha256": "f3dccf9f9194276c661a1b78f55638ecfb2c3f59ead920bf666db358fb303904"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Context-Preserved Meaning Capture", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:context_preserved_meaning_capture", "slug": "context_preserved_meaning_capture"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A phenomenon is being abstracted into notes, data, evidence, examples, requirements, or claims. If only the surface event is preserved, later interpreters may misread salience, import their own categories, miss local meanings, flatten actor roles, or treat a context-dependent signal as universal. The problem is how to preserve enough context for meaning recovery without drowning the record in indiscriminate detail.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A phenomenon is being abstracted into notes, data, evidence, examples, requirements, or claims. If only the surface event is preserved, later interpreters may misread salience, import their own categories, miss local meanings, flatten actor roles, or treat a context-dependent signal as universal. The problem is how to preserve enough context for meaning recovery without drowning the record in indiscriminate detail."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A thick-description practice can support a contemporaneous interpreter who remains present in the setting; later absence is not mandatory.", "slug": "thick_description"}], "residual_id": "r:context_preserved_meaning_capture:b015_a08_c1", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b015_a08_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "If only the surface event is preserved, later interpreters may misread salience, import their own categories, miss local meanings, flatten actor roles, or treat a context-dependent signal as universal. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A later audience will interpret an event, behavior, statement, artifact, or scene without direct access to the original setting.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A later audience will interpret an event, behavior, statement, artifact, or scene without direct access to the original setting.", "If only the surface event is preserved, later interpreters may misread salience, import their own categories, miss local meanings, flatten actor roles, or treat a context-dependent signal as universal."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A thick-description practice can support a contemporaneous interpreter who remains present in the setting; later absence is not mandatory.", "slug": "thick_description"}], "normalized_requirement": "A later audience will interpret an event, behavior, statement, artifact, or scene without direct access to the original setting.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A later audience will interpret an event, behavior, statement, artifact, or scene without direct access to the original setting.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires surrounding prior states, roles, conventions, audiences, and stakes to make meaning recoverable.", "role_mapping": "Listed context -> context envelope; event meaning -> interpretive yield.", "slug": "thick_description", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime requires a meaning-bearing surround such as time, place, speaker role, sequence, population, scope, or state.", "role_mapping": "Local context -> meaning-bearing surround; meaning dependence -> restoration test.", "slug": "context_stripping", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b015_a08_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "If only the surface event is preserved, later interpreters may misread salience, import their own categories, miss local meanings, flatten actor roles, or treat a context-dependent signal as universal. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Meaning depends on local norms, roles, histories, relationships, timing, place, language, embodiment, or institutional context.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Meaning depends on local norms, roles, histories, relationships, timing, place, language, embodiment, or institutional context.", "If only the surface event is preserved, later interpreters may misread salience, import their own categories, miss local meanings, flatten actor roles, or treat a context-dependent signal as universal."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Thick Description", "one_liner": "Record a phenomenon together with the surrounding context that makes its meaning recoverable, not just the bare surface event.", "page_ref": "prime:thick_description", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Listed context -> context envelope; event meaning -> interpretive yield.", "slug": "thick_description", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires surrounding prior states, roles, conventions, audiences, and stakes to make meaning recoverable."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Context Stripping", "one_liner": "Context stripping preserves a focal signal while removing meaning-bearing surrounding state, widening or redirecting the interpretations the unchanged signal can support.", "page_ref": "prime:context_stripping", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Local context -> meaning-bearing surround; meaning dependence -> restoration test.", "slug": "context_stripping", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a meaning-bearing surround such as time, place, speaker role, sequence, population, scope, or state."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Meaning depends on local norms, roles, histories, relationships, timing, place, language, embodiment, or institutional context.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime distinguishes bare surface form from the contextual distinctions needed to tell genuinely different events apart.", "role_mapping": "Surface fact -> focal event form; setting -> context envelope; misreading -> failed event-disambiguation test.", "slug": "thick_description", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b015_a08_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Surface facts are easy to record but easy to misinterpret outside their setting. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Surface facts are easy to record but easy to misinterpret outside their setting."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Thick Description", "one_liner": "Record a phenomenon together with the surrounding context that makes its meaning recoverable, not just the bare surface event.", "page_ref": "prime:thick_description", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Surface fact -> focal event form; setting -> context envelope; misreading -> failed event-disambiguation test.", "slug": "thick_description", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime distinguishes bare surface form from the contextual distinctions needed to tell genuinely different events apart."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Surface facts are easy to record but easy to misinterpret outside their setting.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime definitionally preserves a focal signal while a projection removes contextual coordinates needed to constrain interpretation.", "role_mapping": "Compression/sampling/etc. -> projection; surround -> omitted context; risk -> enlarged interpretation set.", "slug": "context_stripping", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b015_a08_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: There is risk that compression, sampling, translation, or classification will strip away the meaning-bearing surround. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["There is risk that compression, sampling, translation, or classification will strip away the meaning-bearing surround."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Context Stripping", "one_liner": "Context stripping preserves a focal signal while removing meaning-bearing surrounding state, widening or redirecting the interpretations the unchanged signal can support.", "page_ref": "prime:context_stripping", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Compression/sampling/etc. -> projection; surround -> omitted context; risk -> enlarged interpretation set.", "slug": "context_stripping", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime definitionally preserves a focal signal while a projection removes contextual coordinates needed to constrain interpretation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "There is risk that compression, sampling, translation, or classification will strip away the meaning-bearing surround.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The phenomenon may be coded, compared, generalized, audited, litigated, designed from, or used as evidence later.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A phenomenon is being abstracted into notes, data, evidence, examples, requirements, or claims. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The phenomenon may be coded, compared, generalized, audited, litigated, designed from, or used as evidence later. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The phenomenon may be coded, compared, generalized, audited, litigated, designed from, or used as evidence later.", "A phenomenon is being abstracted into notes, data, evidence, examples, requirements, or claims."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The phenomenon may be coded, compared, generalized, audited, litigated, designed from, or used as evidence later."}, {"display_text": "The observer has enough proximity to capture context but must also record their own standpoint and uncertainty.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The problem is how to preserve enough context for meaning recovery without drowning the record in indiscriminate detail. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: The observer has enough proximity to capture context but must also record their own standpoint and uncertainty. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The observer has enough proximity to capture context but must also record their own standpoint and uncertainty.", "The problem is how to preserve enough context for meaning recovery without drowning the record in indiscriminate detail."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The observer has enough proximity to capture context but must also record their own standpoint and uncertainty."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 15, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-015", "ledger_sha256": "f3dccf9f9194276c661a1b78f55638ecfb2c3f59ead920bf666db358fb303904"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Contextual Mode-Switching Protocol", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:contextual_mode_switching_protocol", "slug": "contextual_mode_switching_protocol"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 6, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 5, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 6 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 1 of 6 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is mode inertia. Participants continue acting under the old mode even though the context has changed. Sometimes the opposite happens: a leader or system changes the mode without telling people, so participants only discover the new expectations after they have violated them.\n\nThis creates predictable failures. People debate when they should decide, decide when they should explore, evaluate when they should coach, stay casual when they should escalate, or remain in emergency posture after the emergency has passed.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A person, team, institution, product, or conversation continues operating under a mode that no longer fits the current audience, role, phase, risk level, authority structure, or consequence environment."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P015-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include the directional phase change from exploration to decision.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A meeting transitions from an exploration phase to a decision phase.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve continuation of exploration-mode behavior into the decision phase.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Participants continue treating meeting material as brainstorm material after the transition.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail a mismatch between current phase and continuing participant behavior.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Participant behavior is keyed to the prior exploration mode rather than the meeting's current decision mode.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "A meeting moves from exploration to decision while participants continue treating everything as brainstorm material.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "participant behavior remains exploratory after a meeting enters decision mode", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P015-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime covers many discrete behavioral modes and does not require a meeting or an exploration-to-decision mismatch.", "slug": "contextual_mode_switching"}], "residual_id": "r:contextual_mode_switching_protocol:b015_a09_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b015_a09_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A meeting moves from exploration to decision, but participants keep behaving as if everything is still brainstorm material. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A meeting moves from exploration to decision, but participants keep behaving as if everything is still brainstorm material."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime covers many discrete behavioral modes and does not require a meeting or an exploration-to-decision mismatch.", "slug": "contextual_mode_switching"}], "normalized_requirement": "A meeting moves from exploration to decision, but participants keep behaving as if everything is still brainstorm material.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A meeting moves from exploration to decision, but participants keep behaving as if everything is still brainstorm material.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P015-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include a support interaction with a routine-mode baseline.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An interaction is operating as routine support.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail a threshold crossing, not merely proximity to or monitoring of a threshold.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The interaction crosses the relevant threshold.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must apply to one of the named threshold domains or a structurally comparable support-interaction threshold.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The crossed threshold concerns safety, law, severity, complaint status, escalation, or a comparable domain.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "A routine support interaction crosses a safety, legal, severity, complaint, or escalation threshold.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "a routine support interaction crosses a named threshold", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P015-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime does not require a support interaction or a safety, legal, complaint, or severity threshold.", "slug": "contextual_mode_switching"}], "residual_id": "r:contextual_mode_switching_protocol:b015_a09_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b015_a09_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A routine support answer should not be mistaken for a safety investigation. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A routine support interaction crosses a safety, legal, severity, complaint, or escalation threshold.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A routine support interaction crosses a safety, legal, severity, complaint, or escalation threshold.", "A routine support answer should not be mistaken for a safety investigation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime does not require a support interaction or a safety, legal, complaint, or severity threshold.", "slug": "contextual_mode_switching"}], "normalized_requirement": "A routine support interaction crosses a safety, legal, severity, complaint, or escalation threshold.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A routine support interaction crosses a safety, legal, severity, complaint, or escalation threshold.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P015-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include an actual role transition by one authority-bearing participant rather than static or simultaneous role possession.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A manager, teacher, reviewer, facilitator, or comparable authority-bearing participant shifts from one role to another.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the role shift as antecedent context for interpreting the subsequent speech.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The participant's role shift occurs before or while the audience receives the participant's speech.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include an audience attempting to classify speech from the same participant who shifted roles.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "An audience receives and interprets the role-shifting participant's speech.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must bind possible audience uncertainty to the same participant's role shift and speech; unrelated role-change and speech-ambiguity facts cannot be combined.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The role shift is the context in which the audience's classification of the participant's subsequent speech is uncertain.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve possible audience uncertainty rather than require that every audience is actually confused.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The audience may be unable to determine the speech's function or authority status.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern ambiguity among speech functions that carry materially different authority or consequence.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The uncertain status concerns advice, evaluation, instruction, official decision, or a comparable speech function with different authority consequences.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "After a manager, teacher, reviewer, facilitator, or comparable authority-bearing participant shifts roles, the audience may not know whether the participant's speech is advice, evaluation, instruction, or an official decision.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "an authority-bearing role shift leaves the status of subsequent speech potentially uncertain to the audience", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P015-C13-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A discrete mode switch need not involve the listed authority roles or ambiguity among advice, evaluation, instruction, and decision.", "slug": "contextual_mode_switching"}], "residual_id": "r:contextual_mode_switching_protocol:b015_a09_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b015_a09_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A manager, teacher, reviewer, or facilitator shifts roles and the audience may not know whether the speech is advice, evaluation, instruction, or official decision. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A manager, teacher, reviewer, or facilitator shifts roles and the audience may not know whether the speech is advice, evaluation, instruction, or official decision."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A discrete mode switch need not involve the listed authority roles or ambiguity among advice, evaluation, instruction, and decision.", "slug": "contextual_mode_switching"}], "normalized_requirement": "A manager, teacher, reviewer, or facilitator shifts roles and the audience may not know whether the speech is advice, evaluation, instruction, or official decision.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A manager, teacher, reviewer, or facilitator shifts roles and the audience may not know whether the speech is advice, evaluation, instruction, or official decision.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P015-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include a team capable of working through informal collaboration.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A team operates in an informal collaboration mode.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require mode switching rather than merely allow the modes to coexist.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The team must move between informal collaboration and a distinct consequential mode.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only if the required switch is between informal collaboration and formal governance.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A complete branch pairs informal collaboration with formal governance.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only if the required switch is between informal collaboration and record-making.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A complete branch pairs informal collaboration with record-making.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only if the required switch is between informal collaboration and a commitment mode.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "A complete branch pairs informal collaboration with commitment.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only if the required switch is between informal collaboration and incident command.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "A complete branch pairs informal collaboration with incident command.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A team must move between informal collaboration and formal governance, record-making, commitment, or incident command.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "a team must switch between informal collaboration and a consequential mode", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P015-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime can switch non-social or non-governance modes and does not require informal-to-formal movement.", "slug": "contextual_mode_switching"}], "residual_id": "r:contextual_mode_switching_protocol:b015_a09_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b015_a09_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "An incident command directive should not be treated as casual discussion. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A team must move between informal collaboration and formal governance, record-making, commitment, or incident command.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A team must move between informal collaboration and formal governance, record-making, commitment, or incident command.", "An incident command directive should not be treated as casual discussion."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime can switch non-social or non-governance modes and does not require informal-to-formal movement.", "slug": "contextual_mode_switching"}], "normalized_requirement": "A team must move between informal collaboration and formal governance, record-making, commitment, or incident command.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A team must move between informal collaboration and formal governance, record-making, commitment, or incident command.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B5", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P015-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must identify a single communication channel whose identity remains fixed across every following use obligation.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "One communication channel is shared across all four named uses.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail casual discussion on the shared channel.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The same channel is used for casual discussion.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail urgent coordination on the shared channel.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The same channel is used for urgent coordination.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail formal announcements on the shared channel.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The same channel is used for formal announcements.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail postmortem learning on the shared channel.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The same channel is used for postmortem learning.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail the absence of visible mode labels, not merely inconsistent or optional labels.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "Visible labels do not identify the active communication mode.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "One communication channel carries casual discussion, urgent coordination, formal announcements, and postmortem learning without visible mode labels.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "one channel carries all four named communication uses without visible mode labels", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P015-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime requires context-keyed discrete modes but not one shared communication channel or missing visible labels.", "slug": "contextual_mode_switching"}], "residual_id": "r:contextual_mode_switching_protocol:b015_a09_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b015_a09_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "An incident command directive should not be treated as casual discussion. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The same communication channel is used for casual discussion, urgent coordination, formal announcements, and postmortem learning without visible mode labels.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The same communication channel is used for casual discussion, urgent coordination, formal announcements, and postmortem learning without visible mode labels.", "An incident command directive should not be treated as casual discussion."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime requires context-keyed discrete modes but not one shared communication channel or missing visible labels.", "slug": "contextual_mode_switching"}], "normalized_requirement": "The same communication channel is used for casual discussion, urgent coordination, formal announcements, and postmortem learning without visible mode labels.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The same communication channel is used for casual discussion, urgent coordination, formal announcements, and postmortem learning without visible mode labels.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 5", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B6", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P016-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require an interpreter role and an interaction being interpreted; the participant may be a learner, customer, patient, stakeholder, team member, or a comparable participant.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A participant interprets an interaction.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require the expectation to organize or condition the participant's interpretation of that interaction.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The participant uses an expectation as the frame for interpreting the interaction.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Reject cases in which the expectation is merely unstated, uncertain, or different but not incorrect.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The expectation is wrong relative to the interaction's actual power, stakes, or consequences.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when the mistaken expectation is about power or authority relations.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The incorrect expectation concerns power.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when the mistaken expectation is about the importance, risk, or stakes of the interaction.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The incorrect expectation concerns stakes.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when the mistaken expectation is about consequences that may follow from the interaction.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The incorrect expectation concerns consequences.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A participant interprets an interaction through an incorrect expectation about power, stakes, or consequences.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "a participant misinterprets an interaction by applying an incorrect expectation", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P016-C01-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A correctly gated switch need not be misinterpreted by any listed participant.", "slug": "contextual_mode_switching"}], "residual_id": "r:contextual_mode_switching_protocol:b015_a09_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b015_a09_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially helpful when risk, role, phase, audience, authority, urgency, or consequence changes during an interaction. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A learner, customer, patient, stakeholder, or team member interprets the interaction under the wrong expectation about power, stakes, or consequences.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A learner, customer, patient, stakeholder, or team member interprets the interaction under the wrong expectation about power, stakes, or consequences.", "It is especially helpful when risk, role, phase, audience, authority, urgency, or consequence changes during an interaction."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A complete mode_error instance falsifying the selected branch conflicts with its exact defining roles or relation.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Mode Error", "one_liner": "The interaction failure in which the same user action is interpreted differently by a system depending on a hidden mode the user does not perceive — the user acts correctly for the mode they believe is active, and the system, in the actually active mode, does something else.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:mode_error", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "mode_error"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "mode_error", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P016-C01-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact mode-error signature requires a participant to act through a believed mode that is wrong relative to the actual mode and thereby produces a different consequence. That necessarily satisfies the consequence DNF branch; the one-line veto incorrectly treats the same expectation-mediated interaction failure as a different relation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A learner, customer, patient, stakeholder, or team member interprets the interaction under the wrong expectation about power, stakes, or consequences.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 6", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "DISJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 15, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-015", "ledger_sha256": "f3dccf9f9194276c661a1b78f55638ecfb2c3f59ead920bf666db358fb303904"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Contextual Selective Propagation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:contextual_selective_propagation", "slug": "contextual_selective_propagation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 5, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 3, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 3, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 3 of 5 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A meaning can propagate faster than its context. Once a signifier moves through media, meetings, documents, platforms, training, professional networks, or informal conversation, receivers may preserve the intended sense, broaden it, narrow it, invert it, moralize it, trivialize it, or attach it to legacy meanings.\n\nThe structural failure is treating propagation as uniform transmission. In reality, contexts are filters. A term that remains precise inside one community can become an empty buzzword elsewhere. A legitimate local term can be appropriated or distorted outside its source community. A technical definition can become unsafe when reused without its assumptions.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A term, label, practice, signal, or interpretive frame has changed meaning in one context and is spreading into others without clarity about which sense is traveling, which communities are interpreting it, which channels amplify it, and which contexts require translation or containment. The result is semantic drift, contested usage, false consensus, accidental stigma, jargon leakage, or incompatible local definitions."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P016-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require one lexical item and two contrasting user roles: specialists and outsiders.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The same term is used by a specialist community and by outsiders to that community.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require a directed semantic change inside the specialist community from an earlier or broader range to a later narrower sense, not merely a statically specialized sense.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The term's sense narrows over time within the specialist community.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require outsider use to retain a broader range relative to the specialist community's narrowed use.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Outsiders use the term in a broader sense than the narrowed specialist sense.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require the cross-community contrast to be concurrently active rather than two unrelated historical definitions.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The narrowed specialist use and broader outsider use coexist across the two communities in the relevant period.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "A term undergoes semantic narrowing within a specialist community while outsiders use the same term in a broader sense.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "a term narrows diachronically within a specialist community while broader outsider use coexists", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P016-C02-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime describes property-selective passage of heterogeneous components through a carrier, not semantic narrowing across communities.", "slug": "selective_propagation"}], "residual_id": "r:contextual_selective_propagation:b015_a10_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b015_a10_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when the meaning is narrowing in specialist use, widening in public or managerial use, or being translated between communities with different background assumptions. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A term narrows in a specialist community but is used broadly by outsiders.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A term narrows in a specialist community but is used broadly by outsiders.", "It is especially useful when the meaning is narrowing in specialist use, widening in public or managerial use, or being translated between communities with different background assumptions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime describes property-selective passage of heterogeneous components through a carrier, not semantic narrowing across communities.", "slug": "selective_propagation"}], "normalized_requirement": "A term narrows in a specialist community but is used broadly by outsiders.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A term narrows in a specialist community but is used broadly by outsiders.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P016-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require a label whose source or earlier meaning is technical and comparatively narrow.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A label has a narrow technical meaning in its source domain.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require propagation or uptake from the technical domain into one of the listed target domains.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Use of the label extends from the technical source domain into a nontechnical target domain.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require semantic broadening, not merely transplantation with an unchanged meaning.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The target-domain meaning is broader than the narrow technical meaning.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require the stated direction from technical origin to later or derivative broad use.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The narrow technical meaning precedes or supplies the baseline for the broader target meaning.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when the broadened meaning is used in a managerial domain.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The broader target meaning is managerial.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when the broadened meaning is used in a media domain.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The broader target meaning is a media meaning.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when the broadened meaning is used in a legal domain.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The broader target meaning is legal.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when the broadened meaning is used in a popular or general-public domain.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The broader target meaning is popular.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A label widens from a narrow technical meaning into a broader managerial, media, legal, or popular meaning.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "a technical label expands into a broader meaning in a nontechnical domain", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P016-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Multiple senses can coexist without a historical widening from technical to popular communities.", "slug": "polysemy"}], "residual_id": "r:contextual_selective_propagation:b015_a10_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b015_a10_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when the meaning is narrowing in specialist use, widening in public or managerial use, or being translated between communities with different background assumptions. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A label widens from a narrow technical meaning into a managerial, media, legal, or popular meaning.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A label widens from a narrow technical meaning into a managerial, media, legal, or popular meaning.", "It is especially useful when the meaning is narrowing in specialist use, widening in public or managerial use, or being translated between communities with different background assumptions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A brand term widening within a single nontechnical community would falsify the unit, but it would not preserve the selected technical-term-to-popular-usage subtype.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Semantic Narrowing and Widening", "one_liner": "Expand/contract meaning.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:semantic_narrowing_widening", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1", "O2", "O8"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "technical_term_popularization", "predicate": "The widening instance is the popularization subtype in which a narrow technical term diffuses into popular usage.", "rationale": "The exact candidate spine plus one atomic anchored context fact entails a complete DNF branch, and no qualifier-laundering counterexample survives."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "semantic_narrowing_widening"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The widening instance is the popularization subtype in which a narrow technical term diffuses into popular usage."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "semantic_narrowing_widening", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P016-C03-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record expressly names generic extension through mass uptake that diffuses specialist terms into generalist domains. The popularization selector is one candidate-native subtype fact that fixes technical origin and the popular branch while the DSA supplies broadening and temporal direction."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A label widens from a narrow technical meaning into a managerial, media, legal, or popular meaning.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P016-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require one identifiable sign or semantic carrier; the listed object types are examples rather than separate mechanisms.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A meaning-bearing sign is a phrase, meme, risk category, policy term, norm, or comparable carrier.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require cross-community travel of the same sign, not independent invention of unrelated signs.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The sign moves or propagates across at least two communities.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require a difference in the frames through which the receiving or using communities interpret the sign.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The communities apply different interpretive frames to the sign.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require continuity of the signifier or category that travels even if its interpretation changes.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The sign remains identifiable as the same carrier across the community boundary.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "A meaning-bearing sign travels across communities that apply different interpretive frames to it.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "a sign propagates across communities with different interpretive frames", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P016-C04-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The carrier/filter prime concerns physical or population components and does not entail signs moving across interpretive frames.", "slug": "selective_propagation"}], "residual_id": "r:contextual_selective_propagation:b015_a10_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b015_a10_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when a word, label, signal, practice, risk category, or interpretive frame has changed meaning in one setting and is moving into others. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A phrase, meme, risk category, policy term, or norm travels across communities with different interpretive frames.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A phrase, meme, risk category, policy term, or norm travels across communities with different interpretive frames.", "Use this archetype when a word, label, signal, practice, risk category, or interpretive frame has changed meaning in one setting and is moving into others."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "An exchange wholly within one cultural system would falsify the target, but it cannot preserve the exact candidate condition of parties operating from distinct cultural systems.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_BRIDGE", "name": "Intercultural Communication", "one_liner": "The field and practice of managing communicative exchange between parties operating from distinct cultural frames, diagnosing where the same surface utterance carries different presuppositions and repairing the gap below the words that translation alone cannot close.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:intercultural_communication", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2"], "guard_type": "RELATION_SUBSUMPTION", "kind": "INTERPRETIVE_BRIDGE", "normalized_key": "intercultural_exchange_crosses_community_boundary", "predicate": "A shared sign passed between parties operating from distinct cultural systems crosses the boundary between the corresponding cultural communities.", "rationale": "The exact candidate spine plus one general outside-edge bridge entails a complete DNF branch; bridge generality and laundering checks pass."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "intercultural_communication"}, {"kind": "INTERPRETIVE_BRIDGE", "value": "A shared sign passed between parties operating from distinct cultural systems crosses the boundary between the corresponding cultural communities."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "intercultural_communication", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P016-C04-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact candidate supplies one stable sign passing between parties in distinct cultural systems and divergent interpretive frames. The general bridge that such passage crosses the corresponding cultural-community boundary is needed for the community-level propagation wording and is valid outside this edge."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A complete context_collapse instance falsifying the selected branch conflicts with its exact defining roles or relation.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Context Collapse", "one_liner": "The communication condition in which multiple audiences with irreconcilable norms are co-present in one channel, so a single utterance cannot satisfy all at once — a structural failure of the channel, not the speaker's judgment.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:context_collapse", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "context_collapse"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "context_collapse", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P016-C04-U1", "why_it_fits": "Context Collapse requires one stable utterance delivered through a flattening channel to multiple audience communities with incompatible interpretive frameworks. Delivery of that same carrier across those audience boundaries directly satisfies propagation, sign continuity, plurality, and frame divergence."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A phrase, meme, risk category, policy term, or norm travels across communities with different interpretive frames.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P016-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require multiple groups and a shared word, label, symbol, or comparable signifier.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "At least two distinct groups use the same signifier.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require semantic divergence across the groups despite the shared signifier.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The groups assign different meanings to that signifier.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require an appearance or inference of agreement, not necessarily genuine substantive agreement.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The groups appear to agree.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require the apparent agreement to arise because the signifier is shared while meanings diverge.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Their shared use of the signifier causes or supports the appearance of agreement despite the meaning difference.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Different groups appear to agree because they use the same signifier even though they assign it different meanings.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "a shared signifier produces apparent agreement across groups with divergent meanings", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P016-C05-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An arbitrary sign convention can be shared consistently and does not require false cross-group agreement.", "slug": "arbitrariness_of_symbolic_conventions"}], "residual_id": "r:contextual_selective_propagation:b015_a10_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b015_a10_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when the meaning is narrowing in specialist use, widening in public or managerial use, or being translated between communities with different background assumptions. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Different groups appear to agree because they use the same signifier, but they mean different things by it.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Different groups appear to agree because they use the same signifier, but they mean different things by it.", "It is especially useful when the meaning is narrowing in specialist use, widening in public or managerial use, or being translated between communities with different background assumptions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An arbitrary sign convention can be shared consistently and does not require false cross-group agreement.", "slug": "arbitrariness_of_symbolic_conventions"}], "normalized_requirement": "Different groups appear to agree because they use the same signifier, but they mean different things by it.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Different groups appear to agree because they use the same signifier, but they mean different things by it.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B5", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P016-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require an identifiable earlier sense and a later sense of one term.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The same term has an older meaning and a newer meaning in temporal order.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require continued live use of the older meaning, not merely a historical record.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The older meaning remains active in at least one context.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require active spread or uptake of the newer meaning outside the old meaning's retained context.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The newer meaning is propagating in at least one other context.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require concurrent cross-context activity of both meanings during the relevant period.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The older meaning's continued use overlaps in time with propagation of the newer meaning across contexts.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "An older meaning of a term remains active in some contexts while a newer meaning propagates in other contexts.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "older and newer meanings of one term coexist across different contexts during propagation", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P016-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Selective passage can separate components without any old-versus-new semantic coexistence.", "slug": "selective_propagation"}], "residual_id": "r:contextual_selective_propagation:b015_a10_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b015_a10_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A term’s old meaning remains active in some contexts while a newer meaning is propagating elsewhere. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A term’s old meaning remains active in some contexts while a newer meaning is propagating elsewhere."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_SYNTHESIS", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A completed semantic shift with the old sense extinct would falsify the unit, but it cannot preserve the qualifier binding observation to the old-and-new coexistence interval.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Semantic Shift", "one_liner": "Meaning evolves.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:semantic_shift", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2", "O3", "O4"], "guard_type": "TIMING_BINDING", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "semantic_shift_coexistence_interval", "predicate": "The semantic shift is observed during its ambiguous interval of old-and-new sense coexistence.", "rationale": "The exact candidate spine plus one atomic anchored context fact entails a complete DNF branch, and no qualifier-laundering counterexample survives."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "semantic_shift"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The semantic shift is observed during its ambiguous interval of old-and-new sense coexistence."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "semantic_shift", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P016-C06-U1", "why_it_fits": "Both readers identify the same valid timing restriction. Semantic Shift supplies one term, diachronic direction, propagation, and a named interval in which old and new senses coexist; binding the instance to that interval is one atomic candidate-native fact completing the cross-context coexistence obligations."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "An instance in which the old scope has vanished everywhere would contradict the exact structural signature that some contexts retain the older while others propagate the newer.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Semantic Narrowing and Widening", "one_liner": "Expand/contract meaning.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:semantic_narrowing_widening", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "semantic_narrowing_widening"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "semantic_narrowing_widening", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P016-C06-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact structural signature already requires selective application in which some contexts propagate the newer scope while others retain the older. Together with the directed meaning-change trajectory, this directly entails all four obligations; a timing guard would duplicate mandatory exact-record structure."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A term's old meaning remains active in some contexts while a newer meaning is propagating elsewhere.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 5", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "DISJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A communication campaign, standards rollout, policy update, or community norm change needs controlled transfer across settings.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: A communication campaign, standards rollout, policy update, or community norm change needs controlled transfer across settings. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A communication campaign, standards rollout, policy update, or community norm change needs controlled transfer across settings."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "A communication campaign, standards rollout, policy update, or community norm change needs controlled transfer across settings."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 15, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-015", "ledger_sha256": "f3dccf9f9194276c661a1b78f55638ecfb2c3f59ead920bf666db358fb303904"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Contingency-Visibility Across Scales", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:contingency_visibility_across_scales", "slug": "contingency_visibility_across_scales"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 4, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 5, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 7 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 4 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 7}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "An outcome is explained at a single scale. A micro-scale account may overemphasize vivid events, personalities, accidents, or local choices while neglecting structural conditions. A macro-scale account may aggregate those events into smooth trends that make the outcome look inevitable and erase the places where actors faced real alternatives. The result is an explanation that either romanticizes contingency or suppresses it.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "An outcome is explained at a single scale. A micro-scale account may overemphasize vivid events, personalities, accidents, or local choices while neglecting structural conditions. A macro-scale account may aggregate those events into smooth trends that make the outcome look inevitable and erase the places where actors faced real alternatives. The result is an explanation that either romanticizes contingency or suppresses it."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P016-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require multiple analyst positions directed at one outcome or event.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "At least two analysts assess the same outcome.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require actual disagreement about the outcome's characterization or causal explanation, not merely different wording or emphasis.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The analysts hold substantively conflicting assessments of that outcome.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied when the disputed characterization contrasts inevitability or necessity with contingency or avoidability.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A complete branch is disagreement over whether the outcome was inevitable versus contingent.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied when the disputed causal locus contrasts structural conditions with the agency of specific actors.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A complete branch is disagreement over whether the outcome was structurally driven versus actor-driven.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied when analysts conflict about accidental or chance causation of the outcome.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "A complete branch is disagreement over whether accident materially caused the outcome.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied when analysts conflict about whether earlier path-specific events or sequencing constrained the outcome.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "A complete branch is disagreement over whether the outcome was path-dependent.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Analysts disagree about whether the same outcome was inevitable versus contingent, structurally versus actor-driven, accidentally caused, or path-dependent.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "analysts dispute a listed contingency or causation characterization of one outcome", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P016-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A continuity-versus-rupture framing dispute concerns the shape of change, not whether its outcome was inevitable or actor-driven.", "slug": "continuity_vs_rupture"}], "residual_id": "r:contingency_visibility_across_scales:b015_a11_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b015_a11_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A macro-scale account may aggregate those events into smooth trends that make the outcome look inevitable and erase the places where actors faced real alternatives. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Analysts disagree about whether an outcome was inevitable, contingent, structurally driven, accidental, actor-driven, or path-dependent.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Analysts disagree about whether an outcome was inevitable, contingent, structurally driven, accidental, actor-driven, or path-dependent.", "A macro-scale account may aggregate those events into smooth trends that make the outcome look inevitable and erase the places where actors faced real alternatives."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A continuity-versus-rupture framing dispute concerns the shape of change, not whether its outcome was inevitable or actor-driven.", "slug": "continuity_vs_rupture"}], "normalized_requirement": "Analysts disagree about whether an outcome was inevitable, contingent, structurally driven, accidental, actor-driven, or path-dependent.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Analysts disagree about whether an outcome was inevitable, contingent, structurally driven, accidental, actor-driven, or path-dependent.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P016-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require evidence at a local, fine-grained, or actor-level scale.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A micro-scale source provides evidence about a phenomenon or outcome.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require a broader account with enough referential overlap for the cross-scale comparison.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "An aggregate account represents the same phenomenon or outcome at a broader scale.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require the event to be visible or recoverable in the micro-scale source.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The micro source reveals a listed local event.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require the selected event to vanish from the broader account, not merely receive less emphasis.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "That event is absent, erased, or not represented in the aggregate account.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when the omitted micro event is a decision.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The locally visible event is a decision.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when the omitted micro event is an accident.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The locally visible event is an accident.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when the omitted micro event is a conflict.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The locally visible event is a conflict.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when the omitted micro event is a near miss.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The locally visible event is a near miss.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Micro-scale sources reveal a decision, accident, conflict, or near miss that is absent from an aggregate account of the same phenomenon.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "micro evidence exposes a local event omitted by an aggregate account", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P016-C08-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Micro-scale analysis preserves fine detail and contingency but need not reveal a decision, accident, conflict, or near miss of the enumerated kind.", "slug": "microhistory_vs_macrohistory"}], "residual_id": "r:contingency_visibility_across_scales:b015_a11_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b015_a11_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A micro-scale account may overemphasize vivid events, personalities, accidents, or local choices while neglecting structural conditions. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Micro sources reveal decisions, accidents, conflicts, or near misses that vanish in aggregate accounts.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Micro sources reveal decisions, accidents, conflicts, or near misses that vanish in aggregate accounts.", "A micro-scale account may overemphasize vivid events, personalities, accidents, or local choices while neglecting structural conditions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Micro-scale analysis preserves fine detail and contingency but need not reveal a decision, accident, conflict, or near miss of the enumerated kind.", "slug": "microhistory_vs_macrohistory"}], "normalized_requirement": "Micro sources reveal decisions, accidents, conflicts, or near misses that vanish in aggregate accounts.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Micro sources reveal decisions, accidents, conflicts, or near misses that vanish in aggregate accounts.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P016-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require evidence at an aggregate, system-level, or long-horizon scale.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Macro-scale data provide evidence about a phenomenon or outcome.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require a local account with enough referential overlap for the cross-scale comparison.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A local account represents the same phenomenon or outcome at a finer scale.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require the feature to be visible or supported at macro scale.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The macro data reveal a listed long-run feature.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require the selected macro feature to be absent from the local account, not merely assigned less weight.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The local account ignores or omits that feature.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when the revealed feature is a persistent or long-run trend.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The macro-level feature is a long-run trend.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when the revealed feature is a limiting structural constraint.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The macro-level feature is a constraint.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Macro-scale data reveal a long-run trend or constraint that a local account of the same phenomenon ignores.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "macro data expose a long-run feature omitted by a local account", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P016-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The scale prime makes macro regularities visible but does not require a local account to ignore them.", "slug": "microhistory_vs_macrohistory"}], "residual_id": "r:contingency_visibility_across_scales:b015_a11_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b015_a11_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A macro-scale account may aggregate those events into smooth trends that make the outcome look inevitable and erase the places where actors faced real alternatives. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Macro data reveal long-run trends or constraints that local accounts ignore.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Macro data reveal long-run trends or constraints that local accounts ignore.", "A macro-scale account may aggregate those events into smooth trends that make the outcome look inevitable and erase the places where actors faced real alternatives."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The scale prime makes macro regularities visible but does not require a local account to ignore them.", "slug": "microhistory_vs_macrohistory"}], "normalized_requirement": "Macro data reveal long-run trends or constraints that local accounts ignore.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Macro data reveal long-run trends or constraints that local accounts ignore.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P016-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require an account with a temporally later outcome and an antecedent path.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A narrative represents a path and an outcome reached later in that path.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require an earlier point at which the subsequent path was not yet complete.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The narrative refers to a standpoint before the path to the outcome had unfolded.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require attributed prior obviousness, not merely an explanation given after the fact.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The narrative represents the later outcome as obvious or already foreseeable from that earlier standpoint.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require collapse of the distinction between later knowledge and the information available before the path unfolded.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The attributed earlier obviousness is projected backward from the later outcome or later knowledge.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "A retrospective narrative projects the obviousness of a later outcome back to a point before the path to it unfolded.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "a narrative retrojects later-outcome obviousness into an earlier informational state", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P016-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Scale choice alone does not entail hindsight bias or a narrative of foreknown outcome.", "slug": "microhistory_vs_macrohistory"}], "residual_id": "r:contingency_visibility_across_scales:b015_a11_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b015_a11_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A narrative treats a later outcome as if it had been obvious before the path unfolded. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A narrative treats a later outcome as if it had been obvious before the path unfolded."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_SYNTHESIS", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A private numerical hindsight judgment would not be a narrative, but it does not preserve the qualifier requiring expression as a narrative of the outcome path.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Hindsight Bias", "one_liner": "The tendency, once an outcome is known, to inflate its perceived prior probability and misremember one's own judgment as closer to it than it was, because outcome knowledge is folded into the memory of the prior situation and reconstructs rather than retrieves it.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:hindsight_bias", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "hindsight_reconstruction_in_narrative_form", "predicate": "The outcome-informed reconstruction is expressed as a narrative of the path to the outcome.", "rationale": "The exact candidate spine plus one atomic anchored context fact entails a complete DNF branch, and no qualifier-laundering counterexample survives."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "hindsight_bias"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The outcome-informed reconstruction is expressed as a narrative of the path to the outcome."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "hindsight_bias", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P016-C10-U1", "why_it_fits": "Both readers identify the same valid expression-mode restriction. Hindsight Bias directly supplies pre-outcome uncertainty, later outcome knowledge, and backward-projected obviousness; one anchored fact that the reconstruction is expressed as a path narrative supplies the only missing narrative role."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A narrative treats a later outcome as if it had been obvious before the path unfolded.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires macro aggregation to average out variance and micro resolution to preserve actor-level detail and contingency.", "role_mapping": "Broad category/trend -> macro account; hidden heterogeneity -> averaged variance; actor detail -> micro account.", "slug": "microhistory_vs_macrohistory", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b015_a11_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A macro-scale account may aggregate those events into smooth trends that make the outcome look inevitable and erase the places where actors faced real alternatives. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A broad category, period, average, or trend hides heterogeneity that mattered to actors at the time.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A broad category, period, average, or trend hides heterogeneity that mattered to actors at the time.", "A macro-scale account may aggregate those events into smooth trends that make the outcome look inevitable and erase the places where actors faced real alternatives."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Microhistory vs. Macrohistory", "one_liner": "Scale of analysis.", "page_ref": "prime:microhistory_vs_macrohistory", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Broad category/trend -> macro account; hidden heterogeneity -> averaged variance; actor detail -> micro account.", "slug": "microhistory_vs_macrohistory", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires macro aggregation to average out variance and micro resolution to preserve actor-level detail and contingency."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A broad category, period, average, or trend hides heterogeneity that mattered to actors at the time.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P016-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require a claim about what could have happened otherwise.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A counterfactual claim posits one or more alternatives to an observed or asserted outcome.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require scale to govern the domain in which the alternatives count as plausible.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The plausibility of those alternatives depends on or is assessed at a micro, macro, or comparable scale.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require an actual omission of the relevant scale, not merely disagreement about which scale is best.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The claim does not specify the applicable scale.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require the missing information to qualify the counterfactual alternatives themselves.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The omitted scale is the scale of alternative plausibility rather than unrelated contextual metadata.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "A counterfactual claim leaves unspecified the scale at which its alternatives were plausible.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "a counterfactual claim omits the scale governing alternative plausibility", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P016-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A counterfactual can specify its intervention, background conditions, and comparison world without any scale omission.", "slug": "counterfactuals"}], "residual_id": "r:contingency_visibility_across_scales:b015_a11_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b015_a11_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A macro-scale account may aggregate those events into smooth trends that make the outcome look inevitable and erase the places where actors faced real alternatives. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Counterfactual claims are being made without specifying the scale at which alternatives were plausible.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Counterfactual claims are being made without specifying the scale at which alternatives were plausible.", "A macro-scale account may aggregate those events into smooth trends that make the outcome look inevitable and erase the places where actors faced real alternatives."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A counterfactual can specify its intervention, background conditions, and comparison world without any scale omission.", "slug": "counterfactuals"}], "normalized_requirement": "Counterfactual claims are being made without specifying the scale at which alternatives were plausible.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Counterfactual claims are being made without specifying the scale at which alternatives were plausible.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P016-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require a collective actor rather than an isolated proposition with no framing agent.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An organization, community, or comparable collective actor advances a framing.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require an inevitability narrative or claim to be actively employed.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The collective actor invokes or uses inevitability as the framing.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require the framing to serve the selected purpose or consequence, not merely coexist with it.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The inevitability framing is used instrumentally to produce one of the listed effects.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when inevitability reduces or evades responsibility.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The framing is used to avoid or deflect accountability.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when inevitability framing supports an inflated claim of individual heroic agency.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The framing is used to overclaim the role of individual heroism.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "An organization or community invokes inevitability to avoid accountability or to overclaim individual heroism.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "a collective actor uses inevitability framing instrumentally for an accountability or heroism effect", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P016-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A path-setting choice can be analyzed without an organization manipulating inevitability or heroism narratives.", "slug": "critical_juncture"}], "residual_id": "r:contingency_visibility_across_scales:b015_a11_c8", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b015_a11_c8", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: An organization or community uses inevitability either to avoid accountability or to overclaim individual heroism. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["An organization or community uses inevitability either to avoid accountability or to overclaim individual heroism."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A path-setting choice can be analyzed without an organization manipulating inevitability or heroism narratives.", "slug": "critical_juncture"}], "normalized_requirement": "An organization or community uses inevitability either to avoid accountability or to overclaim individual heroism.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "An organization or community uses inevitability either to avoid accountability or to overclaim individual heroism.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [8], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A retrospective, postmortem, history, or evaluation must preserve both learning from local decisions and respect for broader constraints.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The intervention must preserve local possibility without losing structural explanation. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: A retrospective, postmortem, history, or evaluation must preserve both learning from local decisions and respect for broader constraints. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A retrospective, postmortem, history, or evaluation must preserve both learning from local decisions and respect for broader constraints.", "The intervention must preserve local possibility without losing structural explanation."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "A retrospective, postmortem, history, or evaluation must preserve both learning from local decisions and respect for broader constraints."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 15, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-015", "ledger_sha256": "f3dccf9f9194276c661a1b78f55638ecfb2c3f59ead920bf666db358fb303904"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Continuity Preservation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:continuity_preservation", "slug": "continuity_preservation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 5, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 3, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 3, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 3 of 5 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a harmful discontinuity. A system treats a boundary as if it were clean and costless, but real dependencies cross that boundary. People may lose support at a benefit cutoff, patients may lose continuity during discharge, users may lose service during a platform migration, or teams may drop work during handoff. The transition itself becomes the failure point.\n\nThe core tension is that change often needs to happen, yet affected actors and dependencies cannot always move from old state to new state in a single unsupported jump.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A change, threshold, handoff, migration, or state transition creates a jump, gap, cliff, or rupture that harms people, destabilizes systems, distorts incentives, or breaks service even when the endpoint state may be desirable."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P016-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require a change in an antecedent variable that governs treatment or outcome.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An input, eligibility condition, timing value, state, compliance status, or comparable governing variable changes.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require the antecedent perturbation to be comparatively small.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The change in the governing variable is small relative to its relevant scale or baseline.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require a downstream response in treatment, disposition, or outcome.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A treatment or outcome responds to the antecedent change.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require a comparatively or disproportionately large response change; a steep continuous response is sufficient and no discontinuity or jump is required.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The resulting response change is large relative to the antecedent change or relevant baseline.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require the causal or rule-mediated direction from the governing-variable change to the treatment or outcome change.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The small antecedent change produces the large response change.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "A small change in an input or governing status produces a comparatively large change in treatment or outcome.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "a small antecedent change causes a comparatively large response change", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P016-C13-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Continuity is smooth change without jumps and has the opposite polarity from an observed cliff.", "slug": "continuity"}], "residual_id": "r:continuity_preservation:b015_a12_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b015_a12_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when a small input change causes a large outcome jump, when people or systems need time to adapt, or when responsibility might disappear between owners. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A small change in input, eligibility, timing, state, or compliance status produces a large change in treatment or outcome.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A small change in input, eligibility, timing, state, or compliance status produces a large change in treatment or outcome.", "It is especially useful when a small input change causes a large outcome jump, when people or systems need time to adapt, or when responsibility might disappear between owners."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A threshold crossing with no discontinuous consequence would be a mere threshold and is expressly excluded by the record’s what-it-is-not boundary.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Mark-to-Market Cliff", "one_liner": "The discontinuous worsening of a financial position when a continuously-marked value crosses a contractual threshold, waking a dormant clause whose enforcement — forced selling, collateral calls, cross-default — pushes the reference further in the direction that tripped it.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:mark_to_market_cliff", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "mark_to_market_cliff"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "mark_to_market_cliff", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P016-C13-U1", "why_it_fits": "Both blind readers correctly find that every Mark-to-Market Cliff contains a small governing-value move whose threshold crossing causes a discontinuous and comparatively large downstream financial response."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A small change in input, eligibility, timing, state, or compliance status produces a large change in treatment or outcome.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P016-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require an object or responsibility capable of being handed from one owner to another.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A person, record, task, system, responsibility, or comparable transferable object is involved.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require distinct ownership positions across which the transfer occurs.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The handoff involves at least a source owner and a destination owner.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require an ownership, custody, or responsibility transfer.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The object or responsibility moves between the owners.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require a possible continuity failure; do not require proof that failure actually occurred.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The transferred object may lose ownership, attention, tracking, or continuity.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require the risk to be specifically associated with the transfer boundary.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The continuity risk arises from the gap created during or between the owners' handoff.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "A person, record, task, system, responsibility, or comparable object moves between owners and may lose continuity in the handoff gap.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "an ownership transfer creates a possible continuity gap for the transferred object", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P016-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid custody transfer has an explicit release-and-bind event that conserves the duty bundle and prevents a gap.", "slug": "custody_transfer"}], "residual_id": "r:continuity_preservation:b015_a12_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b015_a12_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when a small input change causes a large outcome jump, when people or systems need time to adapt, or when responsibility might disappear between owners. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A person, record, task, system, or responsibility moves between owners and may fall through the handoff gap.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A person, record, task, system, or responsibility moves between owners and may fall through the handoff gap.", "It is especially useful when a small input change causes a large outcome jump, when people or systems need time to adapt, or when responsibility might disappear between owners."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A transfer with perfectly preserved full state would not be Handoff Loss, because the exact record requires degradation at the boundary event.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Handoff Loss", "one_liner": "Locate post-transition failures at the transfer relation itself: work crossing a boundary between actors arrives degraded because a bounded artifact cannot carry the sender's tacit state, so downstream decisions run on an impoverished reconstruction.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:handoff_loss", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "handoff_loss"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "handoff_loss", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P016-C14-U1", "why_it_fits": "Both blind readers correctly find that every Handoff Loss contains source and destination actors, a transferred work object, and boundary-caused continuity degradation; actuality entails the unit possibility modality."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A person, record, task, system, or responsibility moves between owners and may fall through the handoff gap.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P016-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require paired legacy and successor versions rather than unrelated old and new objects.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An old arrangement and a new arrangement serve the same function or operating context.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require a replacement, migration, or cutover relation directed from old to new.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A transition from the old arrangement to the new arrangement is contemplated or required.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require the transition mode under evaluation to be one-step rather than staged or overlapping.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The evaluated transition is a single-step switch.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require inability to maintain acceptable safety under the one-step transition mode.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The single-step switch cannot be performed safely.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "An old and a new rule set, system, service model, or comparable operational arrangement cannot be safely switched in one step.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "a legacy-to-successor transition cannot be completed safely as a one-step cutover", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P016-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "One artifact can supersede another directly and need not require parallel transition or unsafe cutover.", "slug": "supersession"}], "residual_id": "r:continuity_preservation:b015_a12_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b015_a12_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A change, threshold, handoff, migration, or state transition creates a jump, gap, cliff, or rupture that harms people, destabilizes systems, distorts incentives, or breaks service even when the endpoint state may be desirable. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Old and new rules, systems, or service models cannot be safely switched in one step.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Old and new rules, systems, or service models cannot be safely switched in one step.", "A change, threshold, handoff, migration, or state transition creates a jump, gap, cliff, or rupture that harms people, destabilizes systems, distorts incentives, or breaks service even when the endpoint state may be desirable."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "One artifact can supersede another directly and need not require parallel transition or unsafe cutover.", "slug": "supersession"}], "normalized_requirement": "Old and new rules, systems, or service models cannot be safely switched in one step.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Old and new rules, systems, or service models cannot be safely switched in one step.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A smooth continuous transition need not be riskier than its endpoints.", "slug": "continuity"}], "residual_id": "r:continuity_preservation:b015_a12_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b015_a12_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A change, threshold, handoff, migration, or state transition creates a jump, gap, cliff, or rupture that harms people, destabilizes systems, distorts incentives, or breaks service even when the endpoint state may be desirable. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The transition itself is riskier than either stable endpoint.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The transition itself is riskier than either stable endpoint.", "A change, threshold, handoff, migration, or state transition creates a jump, gap, cliff, or rupture that harms people, destabilizes systems, distorts incentives, or breaks service even when the endpoint state may be desirable."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A smooth continuous transition need not be riskier than its endpoints.", "slug": "continuity"}], "normalized_requirement": "The transition itself is riskier than either stable endpoint.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The transition itself is riskier than either stable endpoint.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B5", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P017-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O4", "O5", "O6", "O7"], ["O1", "O4", "O5", "O6", "O8"], ["O1", "O4", "O5", "O6", "O9"], ["O2", "O4", "O5", "O6", "O7"], ["O2", "O4", "O5", "O6", "O8"], ["O2", "O4", "O5", "O6", "O9"], ["O3", "O4", "O5", "O6", "O7"], ["O3", "O4", "O5", "O6", "O8"], ["O3", "O4", "O5", "O6", "O9"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate may satisfy this subject branch only when the endpoint-bearing designed subject is a policy.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A complete subject branch is a policy.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate may satisfy this subject branch only when the endpoint-bearing designed subject is a product.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A complete subject branch is a product.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate may satisfy this subject branch only when the endpoint-bearing designed subject is a process.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A complete subject branch is a process.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must positively require formal endpoint correctness for the selected subject branch.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The selected policy, product, or process is formally correct at its endpoints.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must localize the defect at the boundary rather than at an endpoint or diffusely throughout the subject.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The adverse effect occurs at a boundary or transition between the endpoints.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail that the selected designed subject causes the selected boundary outcome.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The endpoint-correct policy, product, or process creates the adverse boundary effect.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate may satisfy this outcome branch only when the caused boundary effect is unfairness.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "A complete outcome branch is unfairness at the boundary.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate may satisfy this outcome branch only when the caused boundary effect is confusion.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "A complete outcome branch is confusion at the boundary.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate may satisfy this outcome branch only when the caused boundary effect is instability.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "A complete outcome branch is instability at the boundary.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A policy, product, or process is formally correct at its endpoints but creates unfairness, confusion, or instability at a boundary between them.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "endpoint-correct policy, product, or process causes a named adverse boundary outcome", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P017-C01-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Continuity can describe a smooth mathematical or physical process without endpoint correctness or boundary unfairness.", "slug": "continuity"}], "residual_id": "r:continuity_preservation:b015_a12_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b015_a12_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A change, threshold, handoff, migration, or state transition creates a jump, gap, cliff, or rupture that harms people, destabilizes systems, distorts incentives, or breaks service even when the endpoint state may be desirable. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A policy, product, or process is formally correct at endpoints but creates unfairness, confusion, or instability at boundaries.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A policy, product, or process is formally correct at endpoints but creates unfairness, confusion, or instability at boundaries.", "A change, threshold, handoff, migration, or state transition creates a jump, gap, cliff, or rupture that harms people, destabilizes systems, distorts incentives, or breaks service even when the endpoint state may be desirable."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Removing endpoint-correct operation fails: the exact record says the fair-value mark is doing its job and locates the cliff in the contractual coupling, whose enforcement moves the reference and creates the boundary cascade.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Mark-to-Market Cliff", "one_liner": "The discontinuous worsening of a financial position when a continuously-marked value crosses a contractual threshold, waking a dormant clause whose enforcement — forced selling, collateral calls, cross-default — pushes the reference further in the direction that tripped it.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:mark_to_market_cliff", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "mark_to_market_cliff"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "mark_to_market_cliff", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P017-C01-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record directly supplies a designed mark-and-enforcement process whose mark is accurate, whose clauses operate as specified on either side, and whose contractual threshold creates the adverse instability cascade."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A content-wrong rule would falsify endpoint correctness, but the guard selects the exact record's content-correct covered-case branch; policy, boundary, causality, and instability then remain required.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Rules-of-Engagement Ambiguity", "one_liner": "Diagnose frontline breakdown under time pressure as a grain mismatch — decision rules written coarser than the environment generates choice points — paid out of a finite discretion budget, relocating the fix from the operator's judgment to the rule, escalation path, and pre-positioned authority.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:rules_of_engagement_ambiguity", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O4"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "covered_endpoint_correctness", "predicate": "The decision rule prescribes formally correct actions in the covered cases immediately on each side of its underspecified authorization boundary.", "rationale": "Publication safety passes: the exact record plus the single audited qualifier necessarily satisfies a complete DNF branch under the stated mapping."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "rules_of_engagement_ambiguity"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "covered_endpoint_correctness"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "rules_of_engagement_ambiguity", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P017-C01-U1", "why_it_fits": "The rule is a policy, its authorization boundary causes behavioral fragmentation, and the exact content-versus-grain branch anchors one qualifier selecting formally correct covered cases on both sides."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A policy, product, or process is formally correct at endpoints but creates unfairness, confusion, or instability at boundaries.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 5", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "DISJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Affected actors need time, support, compatibility, or information to adapt to the new state.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The core tension is that change often needs to happen, yet affected actors and dependencies cannot always move from old state to new state in a single unsupported jump. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: Affected actors need time, support, compatibility, or information to adapt to the new state. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Affected actors need time, support, compatibility, or information to adapt to the new state.", "The core tension is that change often needs to happen, yet affected actors and dependencies cannot always move from old state to new state in a single unsupported jump."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Affected actors need time, support, compatibility, or information to adapt to the new state."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 15, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-015", "ledger_sha256": "f3dccf9f9194276c661a1b78f55638ecfb2c3f59ead920bf666db358fb303904"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Continuity-Preserving Fold Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:continuity_preserving_fold_design", "slug": "continuity_preserving_fold_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 2, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 2 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A layered, extended, connected, or rule-bound structure faces stress that exceeds what rigid continuity can safely absorb. Without a controlled fold, stress concentrates at arbitrary weak points and produces fracture, tearing, delamination, service interruption, legitimacy loss, or sudden discontinuity. The system needs a designed curvature path that preserves continuity while changing shape.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A layered, extended, connected, or rule-bound structure faces stress that exceeds what rigid continuity can safely absorb. Without a controlled fold, stress concentrates at arbitrary weak points and produces fracture, tearing, delamination, service interruption, legitimacy loss, or sudden discontinuity. The system needs a designed curvature path that preserves continuity while changing shape."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a layered or extended internally coupled substrate subjected to directional stress.", "role_mapping": "Listed structure -> substrate; bending/compression/etc. -> applied load.", "slug": "fold", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b015_a13_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A layered, extended, connected, or rule-bound structure faces stress that exceeds what rigid continuity can safely absorb. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A long, thin, layered, jointed, sheet-like, networked, or extended structure must endure bending, vibration, compression, impact, thermal expansion, settlement, or misalignment.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A long, thin, layered, jointed, sheet-like, networked, or extended structure must endure bending, vibration, compression, impact, thermal expansion, settlement, or misalignment.", "A layered, extended, connected, or rule-bound structure faces stress that exceeds what rigid continuity can safely absorb."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Fold", "one_liner": "A layered or extended structure absorbs applied stress by bending rather than breaking, preserving continuity through curvature.", "page_ref": "prime:fold", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Listed structure -> substrate; bending/compression/etc. -> applied load.", "slug": "fold", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a layered or extended internally coupled substrate subjected to directional stress."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A long, thin, layered, jointed, sheet-like, networked, or extended structure must endure bending, vibration, compression, impact, thermal expansion, settlement, or misalignment.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P017-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include rigid shape preservation under a demand for deformation, not flexibility in an unrelated attribute.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A shape-bearing structure is subjected to an attempt to preserve its shape rigidly under relevant deformation or stress.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the counterfactual causal claim that rigidity produces the selected failure.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Rigid preservation would cause a structural failure rather than merely correlate with it.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only if rigid preservation would initiate a crack.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A complete outcome branch is crack initiation.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only if rigid preservation would cause tearing.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A complete outcome branch is tearing.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only if rigid preservation would cause fatigue.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "A complete outcome branch is fatigue.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only if rigid preservation would cause failure at an interface.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "A complete outcome branch is interface failure.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Under the relevant deformation demand, rigid preservation of shape would cause crack initiation, tearing, fatigue, or interface failure.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "rigid shape preservation would cause structural failure", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P017-C02-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A fold exists in the bend regime but does not require a demonstrated counterfactual that rigid shape preservation would create one of the listed failures.", "slug": "fold"}], "residual_id": "r:continuity_preserving_fold_design:b015_a13_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b015_a13_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Rigid preservation of shape would create crack initiation, tearing, fatigue, or interface failure. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Rigid preservation of shape would create crack initiation, tearing, fatigue, or interface failure."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A fold exists in the bend regime but does not require a demonstrated counterfactual that rigid shape preservation would create one of the listed failures.", "slug": "fold"}], "normalized_requirement": "Rigid preservation of shape would create crack initiation, tearing, fatigue, or interface failure.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Rigid preservation of shape would create crack initiation, tearing, fatigue, or interface failure.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's defining invariant preserves connectivity by routing deformation through curvature rather than preserving the original geometry.", "role_mapping": "Continuity -> preserved coupling; original configuration -> pre-stress shape; curvature -> fold.", "slug": "fold", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b015_a13_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Continuity matters more than preserving the original straight, flat, or unfolded configuration. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Continuity matters more than preserving the original straight, flat, or unfolded configuration."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Fold", "one_liner": "A layered or extended structure absorbs applied stress by bending rather than breaking, preserving continuity through curvature.", "page_ref": "prime:fold", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Continuity -> preserved coupling; original configuration -> pre-stress shape; curvature -> fold.", "slug": "fold", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's defining invariant preserves connectivity by routing deformation through curvature rather than preserving the original geometry."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Continuity matters more than preserving the original straight, flat, or unfolded configuration.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P017-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must contain an institutional arrangement for which legitimacy and rule flexibility are coherent attributes.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The subject is a procedure, agreement, organizational structure, or comparable governance arrangement capable of retaining or losing legitimacy.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must bind the relation to exceptions or out-of-normal conditions rather than ordinary unrestricted discretion.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The flexibility requirement applies under exceptional conditions.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail necessity of bounded flexibility, not merely its availability or possible usefulness.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The arrangement needs bounded flexibility under those conditions.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must connect the bounded flexibility to legitimacy preservation rather than to an unrelated performance benefit.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The bounded flexibility preserves the arrangement's legitimacy under the exception.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the source's legitimacy-versus-break alternative and not omit the rigid failure baseline.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The legitimacy-preserving flexible response is contrasted with the arrangement breaking under the exception.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Under exceptional conditions, a governance arrangement requires bounded flexibility to preserve legitimacy and avoid breaking.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "governance arrangement requires bounded flexibility under exception to preserve legitimacy", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P017-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime is a substrate-neutral deformation pattern but does not universally require a procedure, agreement, organization, or legitimacy condition.", "slug": "fold"}], "residual_id": "r:continuity_preserving_fold_design:b015_a13_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b015_a13_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A layered, extended, connected, or rule-bound structure faces stress that exceeds what rigid continuity can safely absorb. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A procedure, agreement, or organizational structure needs bounded flexibility to preserve legitimacy rather than break under exceptional conditions.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A procedure, agreement, or organizational structure needs bounded flexibility to preserve legitimacy rather than break under exceptional conditions.", "A layered, extended, connected, or rule-bound structure faces stress that exceeds what rigid continuity can safely absorb."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime is a substrate-neutral deformation pattern but does not universally require a procedure, agreement, organization, or legitimacy condition.", "slug": "fold"}], "normalized_requirement": "A procedure, agreement, or organizational structure needs bounded flexibility to preserve legitimacy rather than break under exceptional conditions.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A procedure, agreement, or organizational structure needs bounded flexibility to preserve legitimacy rather than break under exceptional conditions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A system needs compact deployment, expansion, deflection, impact absorption, or graceful deformation.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: A system needs compact deployment, expansion, deflection, impact absorption, or graceful deformation. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A system needs compact deployment, expansion, deflection, impact absorption, or graceful deformation."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "A system needs compact deployment, expansion, deflection, impact absorption, or graceful deformation."}, {"display_text": "Repeated stress cycles make unmanaged flexing dangerous.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Repeated stress cycles make unmanaged flexing dangerous. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Repeated stress cycles make unmanaged flexing dangerous."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Repeated stress cycles make unmanaged flexing dangerous."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 15, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-015", "ledger_sha256": "f3dccf9f9194276c661a1b78f55638ecfb2c3f59ead920bf666db358fb303904"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Continuity–Rupture Regime Diagnosis and Transition Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:continuity_rupture_regime_diagnosis_and_transition_design", "slug": "continuity_rupture_regime_diagnosis_and_transition_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 4, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 2, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 2 of 4 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Labels such as gradual, radical, continuous, and revolutionary often conceal the comparison object, observation scale, causal mechanism, and distribution of loss. A symbolic date may be mistaken for causal rupture; a smooth trend may erase local breaks; an abrupt plan may lack recovery; or gradualism may become indefinite delay.\n\n### A layered evidence model\n\nBegin with a typed claim: “Property P of object O changed from state A to state B over interval T, at resolution R, for population or location G.” Then record at least five evidence layers. **State evidence** describes values before and after. **Trajectory evidence** describes the path between them. **Mechanism evidence** traces the process that generated the path. **Boundary evidence** tests candidate onset and completion dates. **Experience evidence** records how different affected groups encountered continuity, loss, or break.\n\nEach item should carry provenance, measurement or interpretive uncertainty, temporal coverage, missingness, selection effects, and plausible counterevidence. A sparse archive can make a gradual process appear punctuated; retrospective categories can create false sameness; a measurement redesign can fabricate a change point; and survivor-only records can hide the people for whom a regime already broke.\n\n### Competing temporal scales\n\nChange can be continuous at one scale and ruptural at another. Daily observations may show a threshold jump inside a decade-long drift; a century-scale account may smooth over years of crisis; a fast operational cutover may rest on slow institutional preparation. The analysis therefore compares micro, meso, and macro windows, tests alternative boundary dates, and distinguishes event time, process time, lived time, and recovery time.\n\nTemporal variables may also be coupled. A fast variable can trigger a transition only after a slow variable accumulates; an abrupt shock can expose rather than create a long-developed vulnerability; a visible policy date can lag the actual shift in practice. The evidence model keeps these clocks separate before explaining their interaction.\n\n### Two asymmetric classification errors\n\nA **false rupture** declares a new regime when underlying mechanisms, incentives, ownership, or effects remain continuous. It encourages theatrical renaming, premature legacy disposal, and exaggerated causal attribution. A **false continuity** treats a genuine change in rules, access, identity, ecology, or lived conditions as mere variation. It can deny loss, postpone rights, preserve obsolete safeguards, and misapply old models. The decision threshold should reflect which error is more harmful in the domain, rather than treating diagnostic uncertainty as neutral.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Analysts or decision makers label change gradual or revolutionary without specifying what persists, what changes, the observation scale, the causal mechanism, or who bears discontinuity. This causes false continuity, theatrical rupture, unsafe cliff changes, indefinite incrementalism, lost legacy, and misattributed causes."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime definitionally encodes an observer-relative framing dispute over whether one changing state continues or a new one begins.", "role_mapping": "Competing accounts -> interpretive spectrum; evolution/transition -> continuity pole; break/revolution -> rupture pole.", "slug": "continuity_vs_rupture", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b015_a14_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use it when competing accounts call the same change evolutionary or revolutionary, when a system may be approaching a threshold, or when leaders must choose phased migration, parallel operation, hybrid change, or decisive cutover. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Competing accounts describe the same change as evolution, break, revolution, transition, or restoration.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Competing accounts describe the same change as evolution, break, revolution, transition, or restoration.", "Use it when competing accounts call the same change evolutionary or revolutionary, when a system may be approaching a threshold, or when leaders must choose phased migration, parallel operation, hybrid change, or decisive cutover."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Continuity vs. Rupture", "one_liner": "Gradual vs abrupt change.", "page_ref": "prime:continuity_vs_rupture", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Competing accounts -> interpretive spectrum; evolution/transition -> continuity pole; break/revolution -> rupture pole.", "slug": "continuity_vs_rupture", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime definitionally encodes an observer-relative framing dispute over whether one changing state continues or a new one begins."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Competing accounts describe the same change as evolution, break, revolution, transition, or restoration.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The interpretive spectrum applies to gradual changes with no approached threshold as well as abrupt ones.", "slug": "continuity_vs_rupture"}], "residual_id": "r:continuity_rupture_regime_diagnosis_and_transition_design:b015_a14_c2", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b015_a14_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use the full pattern when the same evidence supports incompatible change narratives; when observation frequency may turn a ramp into an apparent jump; when a slow-moving variable may be approaching a threshold; when a return path differs from the entry path; when old and new regimes may coexist; or when a transition decision affects rights, identity, records, ecological recovery, safety, or public legitimacy. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A policy, institution, technology, ecosystem, identity, or physical system approaches a threshold.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A policy, institution, technology, ecosystem, identity, or physical system approaches a threshold.", "Use the full pattern when the same evidence supports incompatible change narratives; when observation frequency may turn a ramp into an apparent jump; when a slow-moving variable may be approaching a threshold; when a return path differs from the entry path; when old and new regimes may coexist; or when a transition decision affects rights, identity, records, ecological recovery, safety, or public legitimacy."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The interpretive spectrum applies to gradual changes with no approached threshold as well as abrupt ones.", "slug": "continuity_vs_rupture"}], "normalized_requirement": "A policy, institution, technology, ecosystem, identity, or physical system approaches a threshold.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A policy, institution, technology, ecosystem, identity, or physical system approaches a threshold.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P017-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include aggregate-level continuity or an aggregate representation of continuity.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A system or change appears continuous when viewed in aggregate.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the possibility of aggregate concealment without requiring that every aggregate-continuous instance contains a rupture.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The aggregate continuity may conceal a rupture at a more differentiated level.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only if the hidden break is among subgroups.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A complete branch is possible concealment of a subgroup rupture.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only if the hidden break is regional.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A complete branch is possible concealment of a regional rupture.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only if the hidden break is functional.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "A complete branch is possible concealment of a functional rupture.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only if the hidden break concerns meaning or interpretation.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "A complete branch is possible concealment of a semantic rupture.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "An aggregate pattern that appears continuous may conceal a rupture at a subgroup, regional, functional, or semantic level.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "aggregate continuity may conceal localized rupture", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P017-C04-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime allows mixed state variables but does not require an aggregate measure to conceal a subgroup or regional break.", "slug": "continuity_vs_rupture"}], "residual_id": "r:continuity_rupture_regime_diagnosis_and_transition_design:b015_a14_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b015_a14_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when aggregate continuity may hide subgroup or functional rupture. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Aggregate continuity may conceal subgroup, regional, functional, or semantic rupture.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Aggregate continuity may conceal subgroup, regional, functional, or semantic rupture.", "It is especially useful when aggregate continuity may hide subgroup or functional rupture."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A case with no concealed rupture is not complete gold-standard erosion: the record requires stable-looking metrics while real validity silently degrades because the reference moved.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Gold-Standard Erosion", "one_liner": "Recognize that a model scored against a mutable reference label can show stable metrics while its real validity silently degrades, because the answer key — not the model — has drifted away from the construct it once operationalized.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:gold_standard_erosion", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "gold_standard_erosion"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "gold_standard_erosion", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P017-C04-U1", "why_it_fits": "Stable aggregate validation metrics directly coexist with and conceal a localized rupture in the reference label's semantic connection to the underlying construct."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "If aggregate QA exposed the longitudinal shift, the candidate's defining blind-within-slice signature would be absent; complete instances preserve stable aggregate appearance and hidden semantic rupture.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Annotation Drift", "one_liner": "The gradual, undocumented shift over time in how annotators apply an unchanged rubric, so identical instances get different labels — a silent recalibration of a measurement instrument, invisible to within-slice agreement and detectable only by re-annotating frozen gold.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:annotation_drift", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "annotation_drift"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "annotation_drift", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P017-C04-U1", "why_it_fits": "Stable rubric text and high within-slice agreement provide aggregate continuity while a cohort-level semantic rupture remains hidden across time."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A visible definition change would defeat the candidate's silent-clock mechanism; complete instances retain continuing metrics and dashboards while the target meaning has moved.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Ground-Truth Drift", "one_liner": "The model-evaluation failure in which the operational definition of the correct answer drifts on a clock the monitoring apparatus cannot see, so metrics keep scoring against a moved target while the dashboards stay green — invisible because every detector consumes current ground truth as its reference.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:ground_truth_drift", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "ground_truth_drift"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "ground_truth_drift", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P017-C04-U1", "why_it_fits": "Continuing green dashboards provide aggregate continuity while the operational definition of truth changes silently at the semantic layer."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Aggregate continuity may conceal subgroup, regional, functional, or semantic rupture.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P017-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern a periodizing historical boundary, not an unrelated spatial or administrative line.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A boundary divides historical time into periods for interpreting events.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail a directed change in interpretation attributable to the period boundary.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The placement or use of that boundary changes the interpretation of historical events.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require a consequential difference in interpretation, not a cosmetic relabeling.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The interpretive change is material rather than negligible.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only if the boundary changes how causes are understood or assigned.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A complete branch is a material change in causal interpretation.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only if the boundary changes moral evaluation or responsibility.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "A complete branch is a material change in moral interpretation.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Where a historical period boundary is drawn materially changes the causal or moral interpretation of events.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "historical period boundary materially changes interpretation", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P017-C05-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Periodization enables and constrains analysis but need not materially change a causal or moral interpretation.", "slug": "periodization"}], "residual_id": "r:continuity_rupture_regime_diagnosis_and_transition_design:b015_a14_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b015_a14_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Analysts or decision makers label change gradual or revolutionary without specifying what persists, what changes, the observation scale, the causal mechanism, or who bears discontinuity. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Historical period boundaries materially change causal or moral interpretation.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Historical period boundaries materially change causal or moral interpretation.", "Analysts or decision makers label change gradual or revolutionary without specifying what persists, what changes, the observation scale, the causal mechanism, or who bears discontinuity."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Periodization enables and constrains analysis but need not materially change a causal or moral interpretation.", "slug": "periodization"}], "normalized_requirement": "Historical period boundaries materially change causal or moral interpretation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Historical period boundaries materially change causal or moral interpretation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "DISJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Leaders must choose phased migration, parallel operation, cutover, replacement, or deliberate discontinuity.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use it when competing accounts call the same change evolutionary or revolutionary, when a system may be approaching a threshold, or when leaders must choose phased migration, parallel operation, hybrid change, or decisive cutover. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: Leaders must choose phased migration, parallel operation, cutover, replacement, or deliberate discontinuity. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Leaders must choose phased migration, parallel operation, cutover, replacement, or deliberate discontinuity.", "Use it when competing accounts call the same change evolutionary or revolutionary, when a system may be approaching a threshold, or when leaders must choose phased migration, parallel operation, hybrid change, or decisive cutover."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Leaders must choose phased migration, parallel operation, cutover, replacement, or deliberate discontinuity."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 15, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-015", "ledger_sha256": "f3dccf9f9194276c661a1b78f55638ecfb2c3f59ead920bf666db358fb303904"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Contradiction-Closure Proof", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:contradiction_closure_proof", "slug": "contradiction_closure_proof"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A claim must be established, but direct construction, observation, or forward derivation is unavailable, cumbersome, or less revealing. The opposite of the claim, however, imposes commitments that can be chased until they violate axioms, definitions, constraints, invariants, cases, or accepted evidence. Without a disciplined contradiction-closure pattern, teams either leave the claim unsupported, misuse a loose “that seems impossible” intuition, or derive a contradiction from hidden premise errors and wrongly treat the target claim as proven.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A claim must be established, but direct construction, observation, or forward derivation is unavailable, cumbersome, or less revealing. The opposite of the claim, however, imposes commitments that can be chased until they violate axioms, definitions, constraints, invariants, cases, or accepted evidence. Without a disciplined contradiction-closure pattern, teams either leave the claim unsupported, misuse a loose “that seems impossible” intuition, or derive a contradiction from hidden premise errors and wrongly treat the target claim as proven."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires assuming the target's negation and deriving its consequences under shared rules.", "role_mapping": "Negation -> working assumption; commitments -> derivation chain.", "slug": "proof_by_contradiction", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b015_a15_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The negation implies commitments that can be derived, constrained, or case-analyzed. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The negation implies commitments that can be derived, constrained, or case-analyzed."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Proof By Contradiction", "one_liner": "Establish a claim by assuming its negation and deriving an impossibility.", "page_ref": "prime:proof_by_contradiction", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Negation -> working assumption; commitments -> derivation chain.", "slug": "proof_by_contradiction", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires assuming the target's negation and deriving its consequences under shared rules."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The negation implies commitments that can be derived, constrained, or case-analyzed.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires an accepted rule system genuinely shared by the proof context so the derivation is binding.", "role_mapping": "Premise base -> accepted rules; proof context -> scope of derivation.", "slug": "proof_by_contradiction", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b015_a15_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The opposite of the claim, however, imposes commitments that can be chased until they violate axioms, definitions, constraints, invariants, cases, or accepted evidence. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The premise base, axioms, definitions, or constraints are accepted for the proof context.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The premise base, axioms, definitions, or constraints are accepted for the proof context.", "The opposite of the claim, however, imposes commitments that can be chased until they violate axioms, definitions, constraints, invariants, cases, or accepted evidence."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Proof By Contradiction", "one_liner": "Establish a claim by assuming its negation and deriving an impossibility.", "page_ref": "prime:proof_by_contradiction", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Premise base -> accepted rules; proof context -> scope of derivation.", "slug": "proof_by_contradiction", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires an accepted rule system genuinely shared by the proof context so the derivation is binding."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The premise base, axioms, definitions, or constraints are accepted for the proof context.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires the derivation to reach a discovered impossibility that the accepted system cannot tolerate.", "role_mapping": "Listed failure -> impossibility; precise recognition -> contradiction criterion.", "slug": "proof_by_contradiction", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b015_a15_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The opposite of the claim, however, imposes commitments that can be chased until they violate axioms, definitions, constraints, invariants, cases, or accepted evidence. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A contradiction, violated invariant, empty case set, or unsatisfiable constraint can be recognized precisely.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A contradiction, violated invariant, empty case set, or unsatisfiable constraint can be recognized precisely.", "The opposite of the claim, however, imposes commitments that can be chased until they violate axioms, definitions, constraints, invariants, cases, or accepted evidence."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Proof By Contradiction", "one_liner": "Establish a claim by assuming its negation and deriving an impossibility.", "page_ref": "prime:proof_by_contradiction", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Listed failure -> impossibility; precise recognition -> contradiction criterion.", "slug": "proof_by_contradiction", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires the derivation to reach a discovered impossibility that the accepted system cannot tolerate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A contradiction, violated invariant, empty case set, or unsatisfiable constraint can be recognized precisely.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's retroactive rejection discharges the negation after a binding impossibility and establishes the target claim.", "role_mapping": "Reasoning system -> accepted logic; rejection -> discharge; contradiction -> trigger.", "slug": "proof_by_contradiction", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b015_a15_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The reasoning system permits rejecting the negated assumption after contradiction. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The reasoning system permits rejecting the negated assumption after contradiction."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Proof By Contradiction", "one_liner": "Establish a claim by assuming its negation and deriving an impossibility.", "page_ref": "prime:proof_by_contradiction", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Reasoning system -> accepted logic; rejection -> discharge; contradiction -> trigger.", "slug": "proof_by_contradiction", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's retroactive rejection discharges the negation after a binding impossibility and establishes the target claim."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The reasoning system permits rejecting the negated assumption after contradiction.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A target claim is hard to prove directly but has a clear negation or contrary condition.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The pattern gains force by letting an impossible opposite prove the target, but that force is legitimate only if the impossibility is caused by the opposite itself under accepted rules. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: A target claim is hard to prove directly but has a clear negation or contrary condition. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A target claim is hard to prove directly but has a clear negation or contrary condition.", "The pattern gains force by letting an impossible opposite prove the target, but that force is legitimate only if the impossibility is caused by the opposite itself under accepted rules."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "A target claim is hard to prove directly but has a clear negation or contrary condition."}, {"display_text": "A universal, necessity, uniqueness, impossibility, nonexistence, or exclusion claim needs closure.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Without a disciplined contradiction-closure pattern, teams either leave the claim unsupported, misuse a loose “that seems impossible” intuition, or derive a contradiction from hidden premise errors and wrongly treat the target claim as proven. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: A universal, necessity, uniqueness, impossibility, nonexistence, or exclusion claim needs closure. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A universal, necessity, uniqueness, impossibility, nonexistence, or exclusion claim needs closure.", "Without a disciplined contradiction-closure pattern, teams either leave the claim unsupported, misuse a loose “that seems impossible” intuition, or derive a contradiction from hidden premise errors and wrongly treat the target claim as proven."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "A universal, necessity, uniqueness, impossibility, nonexistence, or exclusion claim needs closure."}, {"display_text": "Stakeholders need an audit trail explaining why the opposite is impossible rather than merely unlikely.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The pattern gains force by letting an impossible opposite prove the target, but that force is legitimate only if the impossibility is caused by the opposite itself under accepted rules. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Stakeholders need an audit trail explaining why the opposite is impossible rather than merely unlikely. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders need an audit trail explaining why the opposite is impossible rather than merely unlikely.", "The pattern gains force by letting an impossible opposite prove the target, but that force is legitimate only if the impossibility is caused by the opposite itself under accepted rules."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "Stakeholders need an audit trail explaining why the opposite is impossible rather than merely unlikely."}, {"display_text": "A direct proof exists but would obscure the essential dependency that the contradiction exposes.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: A direct proof exists but would obscure the essential dependency that the contradiction exposes. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A direct proof exists but would obscure the essential dependency that the contradiction exposes."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 8, "text": "A direct proof exists but would obscure the essential dependency that the contradiction exposes."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 15, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-015", "ledger_sha256": "f3dccf9f9194276c661a1b78f55638ecfb2c3f59ead920bf666db358fb303904"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Contrapositive Elimination Reasoning", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:contrapositive_elimination_reasoning", "slug": "contrapositive_elimination_reasoning"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 2 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 2}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A team must decide whether a candidate cause, status, diagnosis, path, rule antecedent, or explanation can still be true, but direct confirmation is expensive, impossible, or ambiguous. Without a disciplined contrapositive move, the team either leaves impossible candidates alive or rules them out on weak negative evidence.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A team must decide whether a candidate cause, status, diagnosis, path, rule antecedent, or explanation can still be true, but direct confirmation is expensive, impossible, or ambiguous. Without a disciplined contrapositive move, the team either leaves impossible candidates alive or rules them out on weak negative evidence."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a universal forward conditional connecting an antecedent to a necessary consequence.", "role_mapping": "P -> antecedent; Q -> consequence; implication -> forward rule.", "slug": "contraposition", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b016_a01_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A forward implication, requirement, invariant, rule, model, or dependency can be stated as P implies Q. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A forward implication, requirement, invariant, rule, model, or dependency can be stated as P implies Q."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Contraposition", "one_liner": "Run an implication backward: from the absence of the consequence, infer the absence of the cause.", "page_ref": "prime:contraposition", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "P -> antecedent; Q -> consequence; implication -> forward rule.", "slug": "contraposition", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a universal forward conditional connecting an antecedent to a necessary consequence."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A forward implication, requirement, invariant, rule, model, or dependency can be stated as P implies Q.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime uses reliable absence of the necessary consequence to license elimination of the antecedent.", "role_mapping": "Missing listed consequence -> not-Q; eliminated candidate -> not-P.", "slug": "contraposition", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b016_a01_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A missing trace, symptom, artifact, approval, state transition, output, or condition is being used to justify elimination. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A missing trace, symptom, artifact, approval, state transition, output, or condition is being used to justify elimination."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Contraposition", "one_liner": "Run an implication backward: from the absence of the consequence, infer the absence of the cause.", "page_ref": "prime:contraposition", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Missing listed consequence -> not-Q; eliminated candidate -> not-P.", "slug": "contraposition", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime uses reliable absence of the necessary consequence to license elimination of the antecedent."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A missing trace, symptom, artifact, approval, state transition, output, or condition is being used to justify elimination.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The candidate antecedent P is hard to inspect directly, but a required consequence Q is easier to observe, derive, or check.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A team must decide whether a candidate cause, status, diagnosis, path, rule antecedent, or explanation can still be true, but direct confirmation is expensive, impossible, or ambiguous. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The candidate antecedent P is hard to inspect directly, but a required consequence Q is easier to observe, derive, or check. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The candidate antecedent P is hard to inspect directly, but a required consequence Q is easier to observe, derive, or check.", "A team must decide whether a candidate cause, status, diagnosis, path, rule antecedent, or explanation can still be true, but direct confirmation is expensive, impossible, or ambiguous."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "The candidate antecedent P is hard to inspect directly, but a required consequence Q is easier to observe, derive, or check."}, {"display_text": "There are many candidates and search effort should be pruned safely.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: There are many candidates and search effort should be pruned safely. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["There are many candidates and search effort should be pruned safely."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "There are many candidates and search effort should be pruned safely."}, {"display_text": "The cost of a false positive, false diagnosis, invalid eligibility decision, or wrong root cause is significant.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A team must decide whether a candidate cause, status, diagnosis, path, rule antecedent, or explanation can still be true, but direct confirmation is expensive, impossible, or ambiguous. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The cost of a false positive, false diagnosis, invalid eligibility decision, or wrong root cause is significant. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The cost of a false positive, false diagnosis, invalid eligibility decision, or wrong root cause is significant.", "A team must decide whether a candidate cause, status, diagnosis, path, rule antecedent, or explanation can still be true, but direct confirmation is expensive, impossible, or ambiguous."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The cost of a false positive, false diagnosis, invalid eligibility decision, or wrong root cause is significant."}, {"display_text": "The organization needs a record explaining why a candidate was ruled out rather than merely deprioritized.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The organization needs a record explaining why a candidate was ruled out rather than merely deprioritized. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The organization needs a record explaining why a candidate was ruled out rather than merely deprioritized."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The organization needs a record explaining why a candidate was ruled out rather than merely deprioritized."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 16, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-016", "ledger_sha256": "257cdca011003abaffda1067e296ef7c7b43b930d04bd93a5b5855e7dfcb1870"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Contrastive Differentiation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:contrastive_differentiation", "slug": "contrastive_differentiation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 7, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 4, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 4, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 7 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 4 of 7 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 7}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is weakly organized difference. People are not necessarily ignorant; they may have too many descriptions, labels, examples, or signals without a clear account of what separates one from another. A concept is understood until it meets a near miss. A warning state appears routine until consequences reveal it was critical. A role sounds distinct until responsibilities overlap. An option looks attractive until compared against the constraint that matters.\n\nThis problem is intensified by isolated presentation. When items are described separately, the audience must mentally reconstruct the comparison. That reconstruction is expensive and often inaccurate. Contrastive Differentiation externalizes the comparison so the relevant difference becomes easier to inspect and apply.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Options, concepts, signals, roles, identities, explanations, or states are close enough that people confuse them, substitute one for another, or overlook their consequential differences. The problem is not simply lack of information; it is weakly organized difference. The relevant distinction is present but not salient, not represented on a shared dimension, or not linked to the action that depends on it."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P017-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must necessarily contain multiple alternatives that can be distinguished from one another.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Two or more alternatives are involved.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require proximity or similarity that makes the alternatives nearby, not arbitrary unrelated options.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The alternatives are near or similar on a dimension relevant to their use or identification.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail realized confusion, not only a risk that confusion could occur.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Actors are actually confusing or substituting the alternatives.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "Actors are actually confusing two or more alternatives that are near one another on a relevant dimension.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "actors confuse nearby alternatives", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P017-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A minimal pair can be constructed for teaching or analysis even when alternatives are not currently confused.", "slug": "minimal_pairs"}], "residual_id": "r:contrastive_differentiation:b016_a02_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b016_a02_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Nearby alternatives are being confused. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Nearby alternatives are being confused."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Without actual use, substitution is only possible; the guard excludes exactly that counterexample by requiring consumers currently to substitute the two candidate-defined close concepts.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Near-equivalence Mapping", "one_liner": "Bridge two concepts in different controlled vocabularies with a declared correspondence that carries an explicit, typed loss-risk on the bridge itself, so consumers can route each substitution on whether their use falls in the safe zone.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:near_equivalence_mapping", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O3"], "guard_type": "MODALITY_ACTUALIZATION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "mapped_concepts_actually_substituted", "predicate": "Consumers are currently substituting the mapped concepts in use.", "rationale": "Publication safety passes: the exact record plus the single audited qualifier necessarily satisfies a complete DNF branch under the stated mapping."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "near_equivalence_mapping"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "mapped_concepts_actually_substituted"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "near_equivalence_mapping", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P017-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "The record directly supplies two declared close alternatives and consumer use; one atomic actualization guard binds the candidate's own substitution relation to current use."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A label with only one plausible reading is not microcopy ambiguity, and a user who never selects the wrong reading lacks the candidate's required mismatched decompression.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Microcopy Ambiguity", "one_liner": "The HCI failure where a terse interface label admits more than one reading, so the user decompresses it against a prior different from the designer's and acts correctly on the wrong interpretation.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:microcopy_ambiguity", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "microcopy_ambiguity"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "microcopy_ambiguity", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P017-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "A terse label necessarily supplies multiple task-relevant readings, a shared surface that makes them similar, and a user who actually selects the wrong reading."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Nearby alternatives are being confused.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Contrast can expose a purely descriptive difference with no listed consequence.", "slug": "contrast"}], "residual_id": "r:contrastive_differentiation:b016_a02_c2", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b016_a02_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Simplifying a system often requires grouping similar things together, but good action often depends on noticing the exact differences inside a cluster of similar things. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The difference affects action, diagnosis, interpretation, or membership.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The difference affects action, diagnosis, interpretation, or membership.", "Simplifying a system often requires grouping similar things together, but good action often depends on noticing the exact differences inside a cluster of similar things."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Contrast can expose a purely descriptive difference with no listed consequence.", "slug": "contrast"}], "normalized_requirement": "The difference affects action, diagnosis, interpretation, or membership.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The difference affects action, diagnosis, interpretation, or membership.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P017-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must involve multiple items or alternatives whose descriptions can be related.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Two or more items are under description.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must supply description-organizing frames, not merely different item attributes.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The items are described through identifiable interpretive, measurement, or classificatory frames.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail incompatibility or noncommensurability between the frames, not merely diversity that permits direct comparison.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The descriptive frames are incompatible with one another.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Two or more items are described using frames that are mutually incompatible for direct comparison or interpretation.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "items are described in incompatible frames", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P017-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A comparison can use a common commensurable frame and need not begin with incompatible descriptions.", "slug": "comparison"}], "residual_id": "r:contrastive_differentiation:b016_a02_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b016_a02_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "When items are described separately, the audience must mentally reconstruct the comparison. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Items are described in incompatible frames.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Items are described in incompatible frames.", "When items are described separately, the audience must mentally reconstruct the comparison."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "The one-ship version lacks item multiplicity, but the guard selects the exact record's named Plutarchian second claimant, after which substrate and pattern criteria rank the two claimants incompatibly.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Ship of Theseus", "one_liner": "Expose that 'is it still the same thing?' has no brute answer once total component replacement pulls substrate-continuity apart from pattern-continuity — the verdict is relative to which identity criterion you have decided counts.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:ship_of_theseus", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "discarded_components_reassembled_second_claimant", "predicate": "The discarded original components are reassembled into a second claimant.", "rationale": "Publication safety passes: the exact record plus the single audited qualifier necessarily satisfies a complete DNF branch under the stated mapping."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "ship_of_theseus"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "discarded_components_reassembled_second_claimant"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "ship_of_theseus", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P017-C10-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record supplies incompatible substrate and pattern identity frames; selecting its explicitly named reassembled-planks branch adds the second claimant with one atomic context guard."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Items are described in incompatible frames.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P017-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O3", "O4"], ["O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only when the too-abstract representation is a definition.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A complete representation branch is a definition.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only when the too-abstract representation is a label.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A complete representation branch is a label.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require excessive abstraction relative to use, not merely a general term that still guides application.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The definition or label is too abstract relative to the concrete cases it is meant to guide.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail functional guidance failure caused by abstraction, not an unrelated implementation error.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "That excessive abstraction prevents the representation from guiding real cases.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "A definition or label is so abstract that it fails to guide application to real cases.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "abstract definition or label fails to guide concrete cases", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P017-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Minimal pairs can distinguish concrete signals without any abstract definition or label failure.", "slug": "minimal_pairs"}], "residual_id": "r:contrastive_differentiation:b016_a02_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b016_a02_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "If people understand a label in theory but still misclassify boundary cases, a contrastive representation can expose the decisive feature. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Definitions or labels are too abstract to guide real cases.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Definitions or labels are too abstract to guide real cases.", "If people understand a label in theory but still misclassify boundary cases, a contrastive representation can expose the decisive feature."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "If the category label did not suppress concrete properties or block the novel affordance, the exact candidate would be false; the label-to-case guidance failure is constitutive.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Functional Fixedness", "one_liner": "The cognitive bias in which encoding an object under its conventional category label crowds out inspection of its raw physical properties, blocking the solver from a non-conventional use the problem needs and the object's properties would permit.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:functional_fixedness", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "functional_fixedness"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "functional_fixedness", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P017-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "The conventional category label is an abstraction that suppresses the concrete physical properties needed in the case, and that suppression directly blocks the required action."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "The bridge applies only where one compressed label collapses several concrete action cases; with that general subsumption, a complete candidate cannot retain correct concrete guidance.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_BRIDGE", "name": "Microcopy Ambiguity", "one_liner": "The HCI failure where a terse interface label admits more than one reading, so the user decompresses it against a prior different from the designer's and acts correctly on the wrong interpretation.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:microcopy_ambiguity", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O3"], "guard_type": "TYPE_SUBSUMPTION", "kind": "INTERPRETIVE_BRIDGE", "normalized_key": "compressed_label_as_excessive_abstraction", "predicate": "A bit-starved label that maps one surface string to several task-relevant concrete readings is too abstract relative to the cases it must distinguish.", "rationale": "Publication safety passes: the exact record plus the single audited qualifier necessarily satisfies a complete DNF branch under the stated mapping."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "microcopy_ambiguity"}, {"kind": "INTERPRETIVE_BRIDGE", "value": "compressed_label_as_excessive_abstraction"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "microcopy_ambiguity", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P017-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "The record directly supplies a label and failed concrete-action guidance; the general bridge correctly subsumes bit-starved many-reading compression under excessive abstraction."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Definitions or labels are too abstract to guide real cases.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B5", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P017-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must contain a target signal rather than an undifferentiated system state.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "There is a target signal whose detectability is at issue.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include a noise field or noise process capable of masking the target.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Background noise is present in the field containing the target signal.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail realized masking by noise, not merely the possibility that noise could arise.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The background noise actually hides or obscures the target signal.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "A target signal is actually obscured by background noise.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "background noise obscures a target signal", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P017-C12-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P017-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must contain a designated target that can be distinguished from alternatives.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "There is a target signal or state whose identification is at issue.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require target-relevant similarity, not merely the presence of unrelated alternatives.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Alternative states are similar to the target on features relevant to identification.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail realized similarity-based concealment rather than potential confusability alone.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The similar alternative states actually hide, obscure, or confound identification of the target.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "A target signal is actually obscured among alternative states similar to it.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "similar alternative states obscure a target signal", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P017-C12-U2"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A salient item is already prominent and need not be hidden in noise.", "slug": "salience"}], "residual_id": "r:contrastive_differentiation:b016_a02_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b016_a02_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Simplifying a system often requires grouping similar things together, but good action often depends on noticing the exact differences inside a cluster of similar things. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A signal is hidden inside background noise or similar states.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A signal is hidden inside background noise or similar states.", "Simplifying a system often requires grouping similar things together, but good action often depends on noticing the exact differences inside a cluster of similar things."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PARTIALLY_DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A distinguishable cause or correctly scaffolded empty state is excluded by the candidate; complete instances preserve identical rendering across causes and failed target-state identification.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Empty-State Failure", "one_liner": "The interface condition in which a view has no content and provides no scaffolding for the absence — no explanation of the cause, no disambiguation among the possible causes (new, filtered, permission, loading, error), and no next action — so the user, left to infer meaning from nothing, typically concludes wrongly that the system is broken or gated.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:empty_state_failure", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "empty_state_failure"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "empty_state_failure", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P017-C12-U2", "why_it_fits": "Multiple causes have the same observable blank rendering, so those similar alternatives directly obscure identification of the actual system state."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A clearly perceived active mode defeats the candidate; complete instances require a weak or absent mode signal, believed-versus-actual divergence, and wrong mode-relative interpretation.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Mode Error", "one_liner": "The interaction failure in which the same user action is interpreted differently by a system depending on a hidden mode the user does not perceive — the user acts correctly for the mode they believe is active, and the system, in the actually active mode, does something else.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:mode_error", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "mode_error"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "mode_error", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P017-C12-U2", "why_it_fits": "The weak or absent mode signal makes alternative modes observationally indistinguishable, causing the believed mode to obscure the actually active target state."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A surface that uniquely identifies the intended action is not the candidate; complete instances retain multiple plausible readings and actual wrong-reading selection.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Microcopy Ambiguity", "one_liner": "The HCI failure where a terse interface label admits more than one reading, so the user decompresses it against a prior different from the designer's and acts correctly on the wrong interpretation.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:microcopy_ambiguity", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "microcopy_ambiguity"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "microcopy_ambiguity", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P017-C12-U2", "why_it_fits": "Several plausible readings share the same surface label, and the user's mismatched decompression directly confounds identification of the intended meaning."}], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 2, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 1, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A salient item is already prominent and need not be hidden in noise.", "slug": "salience"}], "normalized_requirement": "A signal is hidden inside background noise or similar states.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "PARTIAL_EXISTING_DSA_GROUNDING", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation grounded 1 of 2 eligible atomic units; the remaining unit or units stayed open."}, "predicate": "A signal is hidden inside background noise or similar states.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 5", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B6", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P017-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must contain stakeholders whose attention can affect or inform the relevant purpose.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The attending actors are stakeholders in a decision, evaluation, or shared purpose.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require salience or vividness of the differences, not merely their existence.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The attended differences are vivid or attention-grabbing.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require irrelevance relative to the governing task, not merely lower importance than another relevant feature.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Those differences are irrelevant to the decision, evaluation, or purpose at hand.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail over-focus relative to the differences' relevance, not ordinary noticing.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Stakeholders give the vivid irrelevant differences disproportionate attention.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Stakeholders allocate disproportionate attention to differences that are vivid but irrelevant to the decision or purpose at hand.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "stakeholders over-focus on vivid irrelevant differences", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P017-C13-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid contrast can isolate relevant features without stakeholders over-focusing on irrelevant ones.", "slug": "contrast"}], "residual_id": "r:contrastive_differentiation:b016_a02_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b016_a02_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Stakeholders over-focus on vivid but irrelevant differences. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders over-focus on vivid but irrelevant differences."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid contrast can isolate relevant features without stakeholders over-focusing on irrelevant ones.", "slug": "contrast"}], "normalized_requirement": "Stakeholders over-focus on vivid but irrelevant differences.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Stakeholders over-focus on vivid but irrelevant differences.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 6", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B7", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P017-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must contain a rule that determines a decision or action rather than a descriptive regularity alone.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "There is a decision rule governing downstream treatment or action.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the directional dependency from an upstream input to downstream rule application.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The rule is downstream of and applied to an upstream input, classification, or distinction.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must provide multiple sufficiently comparable cases, actors, or occasions over which consistency can be evaluated.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The rule has two or more comparable applications.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail divergent application under the same rule, not merely different outcomes licensed by relevant case differences.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The rule is applied inconsistently across those comparable applications.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "A decision rule downstream of an upstream input or distinction is actually applied inconsistently across comparable cases or occasions.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "downstream decision rule is applied inconsistently", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P017-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Selection can apply a stable rule consistently and does not entail implementation inconsistency.", "slug": "selection"}], "residual_id": "r:contrastive_differentiation:b016_a02_c7", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b016_a02_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A downstream decision rule is being applied inconsistently. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A downstream decision rule is being applied inconsistently."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_GUARDED_EQUIVALENT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Other fragmentation branches need not be inconsistent, but the guard selects the exact record's named inconsistent-action branch across comparable choice points and excludes them.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Rules-of-Engagement Ambiguity", "one_liner": "Diagnose frontline breakdown under time pressure as a grain mismatch — decision rules written coarser than the environment generates choice points — paid out of a finite discretion budget, relocating the fix from the operator's judgment to the rule, escalation path, and pre-positioned authority.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:rules_of_engagement_ambiguity", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O3", "O4"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "inconsistent_action_branch", "predicate": "The behavioral fragmentation takes the explicitly named form of different actors applying the rule inconsistently at comparable choice points.", "rationale": "Publication safety passes: the exact record plus the single audited qualifier necessarily satisfies a complete DNF branch under the stated mapping."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "rules_of_engagement_ambiguity"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "inconsistent_action_branch"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "rules_of_engagement_ambiguity", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P017-C14-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact rule-to-choice-point spine is present, and one named-branch selector binds the record's explicit inconsistent-action manifestation across comparable applications."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A principled exception would be an acquittal, not special pleading; every complete candidate instead preserves the invoked rule, comparable favored case, and unprincipled asymmetric exemption.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Special Pleading", "one_liner": "The fallacy of exempting a favored case from a general standard the arguer just invoked, without a principled basis — a consistency violation under self-serving direction, exposed by asking whether the arguer would grant the same exception to an opponent.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:special_pleading", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "special_pleading"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "special_pleading", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P017-C14-U1", "why_it_fits": "The candidate constitutively applies one invoked general standard asymmetrically across a favored case and comparable opposing cases, directly satisfying the inconsistent-rule-application unit."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A downstream decision rule is being applied inconsistently.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 7", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "DISJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 16, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-016", "ledger_sha256": "257cdca011003abaffda1067e296ef7c7b43b930d04bd93a5b5855e7dfcb1870"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Contribution Visibility Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:contribution_visibility_design", "slug": "contribution_visibility_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 4 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is pooled output with hidden contribution. In group work, the final product often compresses many different activities into one result: analysis, coordination, review, emotional support, cleanup, stakeholder communication, maintenance, and integration. Some of those activities are visible; many are not.\n\nThis creates two linked distortions. First, under-contribution can be hidden because the group output still appears complete. Second, overload and invisible enabling work can be hidden because high contributors compensate for gaps without being recognized. Over time, trust erodes because people rely on anecdotes, resentment, and reputation rather than contextual evidence.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A group produces a shared output, but individual contribution, dependency, support work, or overload is hidden inside the pooled result. Because contribution is not legible, people may under-contribute, high contributors may be overloaded or unrecognized, coordination gaps may persist, and managers or peers may misread group performance."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P017-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include a collective output attributable at the group level.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A group with multiple members produces a shared or pooled output.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail evaluation of the pooled output as a whole, without requiring that no member-level evaluation also exists.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The shared output is evaluated at the whole-group level.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must contain an internal allocation or distribution of work across group members.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Work on the output is distributed among members inside the group.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require opacity about who did what or how work was distributed, not merely unequal work with full visibility.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The internal distribution of work is unclear or illegible.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve contemporaneous coexistence of whole-output evaluation and unclear internal work distribution.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The work-distribution opacity persists while the whole-group evaluation occurs.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "A group's pooled output is evaluated at the whole-group level while the distribution of work among members remains unclear.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "whole-group output evaluation coexists with opaque internal work distribution", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P017-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A division of labor can assign and expose each role clearly and need not be evaluated only as a whole.", "slug": "division_of_labor"}], "residual_id": "r:contribution_visibility_design:b016_a03_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b016_a03_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A group produces a shared output, but individual contribution, dependency, support work, or overload is hidden inside the pooled result. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A group output is evaluated as a whole while the distribution of work inside the group is unclear.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A group output is evaluated as a whole while the distribution of work inside the group is unclear.", "A group produces a shared output, but individual contribution, dependency, support work, or overload is hidden inside the pooled result."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Member contributions may ordinarily be legible, but the guard excludes that counterexample by binding non-attributable work shares at the same whole-group evaluation.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Assembly Bonus Effect", "one_liner": "The small-group finding that on the right task types a group's output exceeds even its best member's predicted performance — a positive interaction residual from mutual error-correction and partial-insight combination that no aggregation of individual scores captures.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:assembly_bonus_effect", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O4", "O5"], "guard_type": "OTHER", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "member_work_shares_unattributable_at_group_evaluation", "predicate": "At whole-group evaluation, members' individual work shares are not separately attributable within the pooled output.", "rationale": "Publication safety passes: the exact record plus the single audited qualifier necessarily satisfies a complete DNF branch under the stated mapping."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "assembly_bonus_effect"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "member_work_shares_unattributable_at_group_evaluation"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "assembly_bonus_effect", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P017-C15-U1", "why_it_fits": "The record supplies member-distributed interactive work, pooled group output, and whole-output comparison; one contemporaneous attribution-state guard binds internal work opacity during evaluation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A group output is evaluated as a whole while the distribution of work inside the group is unclear.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P018-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must type both sides as contribution classes and preserve the output-versus-enabling distinction.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The compared roles are final-deliverable contributions and enabling contributions to the same work.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail visibility for one or more final-deliverable contributions without requiring every contribution in that class to be visible.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "At least some final-deliverable contributions are visible.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve that final-output form causes the visibility of the existentially selected contributions.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "For those visible contributions, final-deliverable status is the reason they are visible.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail differential visibility between the selected visible deliverables and hidden enabling work.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Enabling contributions to the same work are hidden while those final-deliverable contributions are visible.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the cross-class visibility contrast without universalizing the visible class.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The selected final-deliverable contributions have greater visibility than the enabling contributions.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Some contributions are visible because they are final deliverables, while enabling contributions to the same work are hidden.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Some final-deliverable contributions are visible because of their output form while enabling contributions are hidden.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P018-C01-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Accountability can cover all assigned work and does not require an output-versus-enabling-labor visibility asymmetry.", "slug": "accountability"}], "residual_id": "r:contribution_visibility_design:b016_a03_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b016_a03_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "In group work, the final product often compresses many different activities into one result: analysis, coordination, review, emotional support, cleanup, stakeholder communication, maintenance, and integration. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Some contributions are visible because they are final deliverables, while preparation, coordination, review, maintenance, mentoring, prevention, or support work is hidden.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Some contributions are visible because they are final deliverables, while preparation, coordination, review, maintenance, mentoring, prevention, or support work is hidden.", "In group work, the final product often compresses many different activities into one result: analysis, coordination, review, emotional support, cleanup, stakeholder communication, maintenance, and integration."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Accountability can cover all assigned work and does not require an output-versus-enabling-labor visibility asymmetry.", "slug": "accountability"}], "normalized_requirement": "Some contributions are visible because they are final deliverables, while preparation, coordination, review, maintenance, mentoring, prevention, or support work is hidden.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Some contributions are visible because they are final deliverables, while preparation, coordination, review, maintenance, mentoring, prevention, or support work is hidden.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P018-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern attribution of participant contribution behavior and retain low effort as the suspected explanation.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Participants evaluate contribution behavior that may reflect low effort.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve epistemic suspicion and cannot require that low effort or free-riding is already known to be actual.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Free-riding is suspected but not established by the available evidence.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include an obstructing condition capable of reducing visible contribution independently of effort.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The alternative explanation is a blocker that suppresses or delays visible contribution without implying low effort.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail observational non-identifiability between low effort and blockers, not merely uncertainty about contribution in general.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Available evidence cannot distinguish low effort from blockers.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Participants suspect free-riding, but available evidence cannot distinguish low effort from blockers.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "available evidence cannot distinguish suspected low effort from blockers", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P018-C02-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P018-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern attribution of participant contribution behavior and retain low effort as the suspected explanation.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Participants evaluate contribution behavior that may reflect low effort.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve epistemic suspicion and cannot require that low effort or free-riding is already known to be actual.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Free-riding is suspected but not established by the available evidence.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include a resource, workload, time, or comparable capacity limit rather than treating all low output as chosen low effort.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The alternative explanation is a capacity constraint that limits contribution independently of willingness or effort.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail observational non-identifiability between low effort and capacity constraints, not merely uncertainty about contribution in general.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Available evidence cannot distinguish low effort from capacity constraints.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Participants suspect free-riding, but available evidence cannot distinguish low effort from capacity constraints.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "available evidence cannot distinguish suspected low effort from capacity constraints", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P018-C02-U2"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P018-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern attribution of participant contribution behavior and retain low effort as the suspected explanation.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Participants evaluate contribution behavior that may reflect low effort.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve epistemic suspicion and cannot require that low effort or free-riding is already known to be actual.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Free-riding is suspected but not established by the available evidence.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include missing capability or competence as the rival explanation rather than a motivational deficit.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The alternative explanation is a skill gap that limits contribution despite effort.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail observational non-identifiability between low effort and skill gaps, not merely uncertainty about contribution in general.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Available evidence cannot distinguish low effort from skill gaps.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Participants suspect free-riding, but available evidence cannot distinguish low effort from skill gaps.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "available evidence cannot distinguish suspected low effort from skill gaps", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P018-C02-U3"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P018-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern attribution of participant contribution behavior and retain low effort as the suspected explanation.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Participants evaluate contribution behavior that may reflect low effort.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve epistemic suspicion and cannot require that low effort or free-riding is already known to be actual.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Free-riding is suspected but not established by the available evidence.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include performed supporting or enabling work that is not visible in the evidence, not mere absence of work.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The alternative explanation is actual enabling work whose contribution is hidden from the available evidence.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail observational non-identifiability between low effort and invisible enabling work, not merely uncertainty about contribution in general.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Available evidence cannot distinguish low effort from invisible enabling work.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Participants suspect free-riding, but available evidence cannot distinguish low effort from invisible enabling work.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "available evidence cannot distinguish suspected low effort from invisible enabling work", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P018-C02-U4"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Free riding can be directly observed and does not require suspicion confounded by alternative explanations.", "slug": "free_riding"}], "residual_id": "r:contribution_visibility_design:b016_a03_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b016_a03_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Second, overload and invisible enabling work can be hidden because high contributors compensate for gaps without being recognized. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Participants suspect free-riding, but available evidence cannot distinguish low effort from blockers, capacity constraints, skill gaps, or invisible enabling work.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Participants suspect free-riding, but available evidence cannot distinguish low effort from blockers, capacity constraints, skill gaps, or invisible enabling work.", "Second, overload and invisible enabling work can be hidden because high contributors compensate for gaps without being recognized."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 4, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 4}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Free riding can be directly observed and does not require suspicion confounded by alternative explanations.", "slug": "free_riding"}], "normalized_requirement": "Participants suspect free-riding, but available evidence cannot distinguish low effort from blockers, capacity constraints, skill gaps, or invisible enabling work.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 4 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Participants suspect free-riding, but available evidence cannot distinguish low effort from blockers, capacity constraints, skill gaps, or invisible enabling work.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P018-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail concentration in a few people rather than uniform or merely unspecified allocation.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The exceptional burden is concentrated in a small subset of people.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail repeated absorption, not a single exceptional episode.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The same concentration of burden recurs over time.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must relate the subgroup to absorbing exceptional enabling or recovery work.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The small subset absorbs urgent, integrative, cleanup, or comparable exceptional work.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail absence of recognition for the concentrated work.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The absorbed work is not recognized.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail absence of redistribution or rebalancing, independently of recognition.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The recurring burden is not rebalanced.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "A small subset repeatedly absorbs urgent, integration, or cleanup work without either recognition or rebalancing.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A small subset repeatedly absorbs exceptional work that remains unrecognized and unrebalanced.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P018-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A skewed contribution distribution need not involve urgency, cleanup, lack of recognition, or repeated overload.", "slug": "pareto_effect_80_20_rule"}], "residual_id": "r:contribution_visibility_design:b016_a03_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b016_a03_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Common triggers include group projects where final output masks uneven work, operations teams where the same people absorb urgent load, volunteer systems where some people quietly carry coordination work, and research or product teams where review, maintenance, mentoring, and integration are under-recognized. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A few people repeatedly absorb urgent work, integration tasks, or cleanup without recognition or rebalancing.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A few people repeatedly absorb urgent work, integration tasks, or cleanup without recognition or rebalancing.", "Common triggers include group projects where final output masks uneven work, operations teams where the same people absorb urgent load, volunteer systems where some people quietly carry coordination work, and research or product teams where review, maintenance, mentoring, and integration are under-recognized."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A skewed contribution distribution need not involve urgency, cleanup, lack of recognition, or repeated overload.", "slug": "pareto_effect_80_20_rule"}], "normalized_requirement": "A few people repeatedly absorb urgent work, integration tasks, or cleanup without recognition or rebalancing.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A few people repeatedly absorb urgent work, integration tasks, or cleanup without recognition or rebalancing.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The team needs contribution accountability, but direct monitoring would create fear, privacy harm, or performative work.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when group work hides contribution patterns that matter. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: The team needs contribution accountability, but direct monitoring would create fear, privacy harm, or performative work. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The team needs contribution accountability, but direct monitoring would create fear, privacy harm, or performative work.", "Use this archetype when group work hides contribution patterns that matter."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The team needs contribution accountability, but direct monitoring would create fear, privacy harm, or performative work."}, {"display_text": "Reward, grading, staffing, or recognition decisions depend on contribution patterns that are currently hard to observe.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is also useful when reward, grading, staffing, or recognition decisions depend on contribution patterns that cannot be observed from the final output alone. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Reward, grading, staffing, or recognition decisions depend on contribution patterns that are currently hard to observe. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Reward, grading, staffing, or recognition decisions depend on contribution patterns that are currently hard to observe.", "It is also useful when reward, grading, staffing, or recognition decisions depend on contribution patterns that cannot be observed from the final output alone."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Reward, grading, staffing, or recognition decisions depend on contribution patterns that are currently hard to observe."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 16, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-016", "ledger_sha256": "257cdca011003abaffda1067e296ef7c7b43b930d04bd93a5b5855e7dfcb1870"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Control-Condition Specification", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:control_condition_specification", "slug": "control_condition_specification"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "An experiment or evaluation needs to isolate an intervention effect, but the “control” is underspecified, mislabeled, unrealistic, unstable, contaminated, or ethically unavailable. Without a well-defined comparator condition, the observed difference cannot be interpreted as a meaningful treatment effect, and the study may answer a question no stakeholder actually needs.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "An experiment or evaluation needs to isolate an intervention effect, but the “control” is underspecified, mislabeled, unrealistic, unstable, contaminated, or ethically unavailable. Without a well-defined comparator condition, the observed difference cannot be interpreted as a meaningful treatment effect, and the study may answer a question no stakeholder actually needs."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a case receiving the manipulation and a deliberately matched comparator lacking the tested factor.", "role_mapping": "New intervention -> case of interest; alternative condition -> control comparator.", "slug": "control_sample", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b016_a04_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Without a well-defined comparator condition, the observed difference cannot be interpreted as a meaningful treatment effect, and the study may answer a question no stakeholder actually needs. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A study compares a new treatment, policy, product, message, workflow, or teaching method with some alternative condition.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A study compares a new treatment, policy, product, message, workflow, or teaching method with some alternative condition.", "Without a well-defined comparator condition, the observed difference cannot be interpreted as a meaningful treatment effect, and the study may answer a question no stakeholder actually needs."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Control Sample", "one_liner": "A deliberately matched comparator held alongside the case of interest so that the difference between them isolates the effect of the factor under test from the shared background.", "page_ref": "prime:control_sample", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "New intervention -> case of interest; alternative condition -> control comparator.", "slug": "control_sample", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a case receiving the manipulation and a deliberately matched comparator lacking the tested factor."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A study compares a new treatment, policy, product, message, workflow, or teaching method with some alternative condition.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a defined contrast whose difference operator isolates the factor under test from shared background.", "role_mapping": "Listed alternative -> control; research question -> defined contrast.", "slug": "control_sample", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b016_a04_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Without a well-defined comparator condition, the observed difference cannot be interpreted as a meaningful treatment effect, and the study may answer a question no stakeholder actually needs. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The research question depends on a contrast: treatment versus placebo, standard care, waitlist, no treatment, usual practice, active comparator, sham procedure, or status quo.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The research question depends on a contrast: treatment versus placebo, standard care, waitlist, no treatment, usual practice, active comparator, sham procedure, or status quo.", "Without a well-defined comparator condition, the observed difference cannot be interpreted as a meaningful treatment effect, and the study may answer a question no stakeholder actually needs."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Control Sample", "one_liner": "A deliberately matched comparator held alongside the case of interest so that the difference between them isolates the effect of the factor under test from the shared background.", "page_ref": "prime:control_sample", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Listed alternative -> control; research question -> defined contrast.", "slug": "control_sample", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a defined contrast whose difference operator isolates the factor under test from shared background."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The research question depends on a contrast: treatment versus placebo, standard care, waitlist, no treatment, usual practice, active comparator, sham procedure, or status quo.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires at least a case condition and comparator condition measured under a shared procedure.", "role_mapping": "Units -> cases/comparators; possible condition -> treatment assignment or comparator status.", "slug": "control_sample", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b016_a04_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Participants, units, sites, or users can receive more than one possible condition, or historical/external comparators are being considered. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Participants, units, sites, or users can receive more than one possible condition, or historical/external comparators are being considered."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Control Sample", "one_liner": "A deliberately matched comparator held alongside the case of interest so that the difference between them isolates the effect of the factor under test from the shared background.", "page_ref": "prime:control_sample", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Units -> cases/comparators; possible condition -> treatment assignment or comparator status.", "slug": "control_sample", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires at least a case condition and comparator condition measured under a shared procedure."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Participants, units, sites, or users can receive more than one possible condition, or historical or external comparators are being considered.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The expected effect could be confounded by attention, time, measurement, provider behavior, placebo effects, exposure intensity, or background services.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The expected effect could be confounded by attention, time, measurement, provider behavior, placebo effects, exposure intensity, or background services. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The expected effect could be confounded by attention, time, measurement, provider behavior, placebo effects, exposure intensity, or background services."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The expected effect could be confounded by attention, time, measurement, provider behavior, placebo effects, exposure intensity, or background services."}, {"display_text": "The control group must remain credible to participants, implementers, reviewers, regulators, or decision-makers.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this deployment constraint: The control group must remain credible to participants, implementers, reviewers, regulators, or decision-makers. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The control group must remain credible to participants, implementers, reviewers, regulators, or decision-makers."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The control group must remain credible to participants, implementers, reviewers, regulators, or decision-makers."}, {"display_text": "The ethical acceptability of withholding, delaying, or simulating an intervention must be evaluated.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this deployment constraint: The ethical acceptability of withholding, delaying, or simulating an intervention must be evaluated. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The ethical acceptability of withholding, delaying, or simulating an intervention must be evaluated."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The ethical acceptability of withholding, delaying, or simulating an intervention must be evaluated."}, {"display_text": "Prior evidence or pilot design used an implicit baseline such as “business as usual” without documenting what that actually meant.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Prior evidence or pilot design used an implicit baseline such as “business as usual” without documenting what that actually meant. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Prior evidence or pilot design used an implicit baseline such as “business as usual” without documenting what that actually meant."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "Prior evidence or pilot design used an implicit baseline such as “business as usual” without documenting what that actually meant."}, {"display_text": "Adoption decisions require knowing whether the treatment beats the relevant realistic alternative, not merely an artificial weak comparator.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The cleanest comparator for causal isolation is often not the most realistic or ethical comparator for decision-making. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: Adoption decisions require knowing whether the treatment beats the relevant realistic alternative, not merely an artificial weak comparator. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Adoption decisions require knowing whether the treatment beats the relevant realistic alternative, not merely an artificial weak comparator.", "The cleanest comparator for causal isolation is often not the most realistic or ethical comparator for decision-making."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 8, "text": "Adoption decisions require knowing whether the treatment beats the relevant realistic alternative, not merely an artificial weak comparator."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 16, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-016", "ledger_sha256": "257cdca011003abaffda1067e296ef7c7b43b930d04bd93a5b5855e7dfcb1870"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Control/Data Boundary Enforcement", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:control_data_boundary_enforcement", "slug": "control_data_boundary_enforcement"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A receiver or interpreter uses the same channel, representation, or parsing context for ordinary data and authority-bearing instructions, so attacker-controlled or untrusted content can alter the instructions, policy, query, prompt, command, or workflow that the receiver executes.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A receiver or interpreter uses the same channel, representation, or parsing context for ordinary data and authority-bearing instructions, so attacker-controlled or untrusted content can alter the instructions, policy, query, prompt, command, or workflow that the receiver executes."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires attacker-controlled data to share a substrate with an interpreter's control channel.", "role_mapping": "External content -> attacker-reachable data; semantic context -> shared parser substrate.", "slug": "control_data_channel_confusion", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime requires attacker-influenced input to enter a data role that a downstream intermediary can reinterpret as control.", "role_mapping": "External content -> untrusted data; command/prompt/etc. context -> switchable executor.", "slug": "untrusted_input_execution", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime requires untrusted content to reach an interpreter's control-recognition machinery through its data channel.", "role_mapping": "Forwarded content -> data channel; semantic context -> switchable interpreter.", "slug": "data_control_plane_breach", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b016_a05_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A receiver or interpreter uses the same channel, representation, or parsing context for ordinary data and authority-bearing instructions, so attacker-controlled or untrusted content can alter the instructions, policy, query, prompt, command, or workflow that the receiver executes. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: External content is concatenated, interpolated, embedded, retrieved, or forwarded into a context that has command, query, policy, prompt, markup, workflow, or tool-use semantics.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["External content is concatenated, interpolated, embedded, retrieved, or forwarded into a context that has command, query, policy, prompt, markup, workflow, or tool-use semantics.", "A receiver or interpreter uses the same channel, representation, or parsing context for ordinary data and authority-bearing instructions, so attacker-controlled or untrusted content can alter the instructions, policy, query, prompt, command, or workflow that the receiver executes."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Control / Data Channel Confusion", "one_liner": "A receiver interprets attacker-controlled data as authoritative instructions because the protocol separates control from data by content inspection rather than by structure.", "page_ref": "prime:control_data_channel_confusion", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "External content -> attacker-reachable data; semantic context -> shared parser substrate.", "slug": "control_data_channel_confusion", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires attacker-controlled data to share a substrate with an interpreter's control channel."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Untrusted Input Execution", "one_liner": "Attacker-influenced input crosses a data-to-control (or authority) boundary and a correctly-operating intermediary executes it with the intermediary's own authority, so the attacker borrows the defender's privilege without ever violating the intermediary's rules.", "page_ref": "prime:untrusted_input_execution", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "External content -> untrusted data; command/prompt/etc. context -> switchable executor.", "slug": "untrusted_input_execution", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires attacker-influenced input to enter a data role that a downstream intermediary can reinterpret as control."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Data-Control Plane Breach", "one_liner": "Untrusted content crosses into the data channel un-inertised and an interpreter, operating correctly by its own rules, executes it as control, wielding the defender's authority for the attacker.", "page_ref": "prime:data_control_plane_breach", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Forwarded content -> data channel; semantic context -> switchable interpreter.", "slug": "data_control_plane_breach", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires untrusted content to reach an interpreter's control-recognition machinery through its data channel."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "External content is concatenated, interpolated, embedded, retrieved, or forwarded into a context that has command, query, policy, prompt, markup, workflow, or tool-use semantics.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a parser to act on content it classifies as authoritative control.", "role_mapping": "Downstream interpreter -> parser; listed powers -> control-channel authority.", "slug": "control_data_channel_confusion", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime requires the intermediary to execute crossed-in input with its own valid authority.", "role_mapping": "Interpreter -> intermediary; listed powers -> defender authority.", "slug": "untrusted_input_execution", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime requires executed crossed-in content to wield the interpreter's authority and trust.", "role_mapping": "Interpreter -> switchable component; protected action -> wielded authority.", "slug": "data_control_plane_breach", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b016_a05_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A receiver or interpreter uses the same channel, representation, or parsing context for ordinary data and authority-bearing instructions, so attacker-controlled or untrusted content can alter the instructions, policy, query, prompt, command, or workflow that the receiver executes. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The downstream interpreter has authority to read protected state, call tools, mutate resources, execute commands, make decisions, or reveal information.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The downstream interpreter has authority to read protected state, call tools, mutate resources, execute commands, make decisions, or reveal information.", "A receiver or interpreter uses the same channel, representation, or parsing context for ordinary data and authority-bearing instructions, so attacker-controlled or untrusted content can alter the instructions, policy, query, prompt, command, or workflow that the receiver executes."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Control / Data Channel Confusion", "one_liner": "A receiver interprets attacker-controlled data as authoritative instructions because the protocol separates control from data by content inspection rather than by structure.", "page_ref": "prime:control_data_channel_confusion", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Downstream interpreter -> parser; listed powers -> control-channel authority.", "slug": "control_data_channel_confusion", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a parser to act on content it classifies as authoritative control."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Untrusted Input Execution", "one_liner": "Attacker-influenced input crosses a data-to-control (or authority) boundary and a correctly-operating intermediary executes it with the intermediary's own authority, so the attacker borrows the defender's privilege without ever violating the intermediary's rules.", "page_ref": "prime:untrusted_input_execution", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Interpreter -> intermediary; listed powers -> defender authority.", "slug": "untrusted_input_execution", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires the intermediary to execute crossed-in input with its own valid authority."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Data-Control Plane Breach", "one_liner": "Untrusted content crosses into the data channel un-inertised and an interpreter, operating correctly by its own rules, executes it as control, wielding the defender's authority for the attacker.", "page_ref": "prime:data_control_plane_breach", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Interpreter -> switchable component; protected action -> wielded authority.", "slug": "data_control_plane_breach", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires executed crossed-in content to wield the interpreter's authority and trust."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The downstream interpreter has authority to read protected state, call tools, mutate resources, execute commands, make decisions, or reveal information.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime definitionally places the channel boundary in content cues that a downstream parser re-inspects instead of structural separation.", "role_mapping": "Inspection/wording/escape -> content boundary; structure/type/provenance -> absent construction boundary.", "slug": "control_data_channel_confusion", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b016_a05_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A receiver or interpreter uses the same channel, representation, or parsing context for ordinary data and authority-bearing instructions, so attacker-controlled or untrusted content can alter the instructions, policy, query, prompt, command, or workflow that the receiver executes. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The system separates data from control by content inspection, prompt wording, escaping convention, or informal trust rather than by structure, type, provenance, and authority boundary.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The system separates data from control by content inspection, prompt wording, escaping convention, or informal trust rather than by structure, type, provenance, and authority boundary.", "A receiver or interpreter uses the same channel, representation, or parsing context for ordinary data and authority-bearing instructions, so attacker-controlled or untrusted content can alter the instructions, policy, query, prompt, command, or workflow that the receiver executes."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Control / Data Channel Confusion", "one_liner": "A receiver interprets attacker-controlled data as authoritative instructions because the protocol separates control from data by content inspection rather than by structure.", "page_ref": "prime:control_data_channel_confusion", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Inspection/wording/escape -> content boundary; structure/type/provenance -> absent construction boundary.", "slug": "control_data_channel_confusion", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime definitionally places the channel boundary in content cues that a downstream parser re-inspects instead of structural separation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The system separates data from control by content inspection, prompt wording, escaping convention, or informal trust rather than by structure, type, provenance, and authority boundary.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires attacker-controlled data to resemble a control token and cross from its inert role into the directive channel.", "role_mapping": "Listed source -> adversarial data; outside-role syntax -> crossing.", "slug": "control_data_channel_confusion", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime requires un-inertised input to be treated as control outside its nominal data role.", "role_mapping": "Source -> attacker input; syntax/instruction influence -> execution crossing.", "slug": "untrusted_input_execution", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime requires input cues to switch the interpreter from data mode to control mode.", "role_mapping": "Semantic role -> data channel; outside instruction -> control reinterpretation.", "slug": "data_control_plane_breach", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b016_a05_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A caller, user, document, website, database field, message, file, or model output can influence syntax or instructions outside the semantic role it was supposed to occupy. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A caller, user, document, website, database field, message, file, or model output can influence syntax or instructions outside the semantic role it was supposed to occupy."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Control / Data Channel Confusion", "one_liner": "A receiver interprets attacker-controlled data as authoritative instructions because the protocol separates control from data by content inspection rather than by structure.", "page_ref": "prime:control_data_channel_confusion", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Listed source -> adversarial data; outside-role syntax -> crossing.", "slug": "control_data_channel_confusion", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires attacker-controlled data to resemble a control token and cross from its inert role into the directive channel."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Untrusted Input Execution", "one_liner": "Attacker-influenced input crosses a data-to-control (or authority) boundary and a correctly-operating intermediary executes it with the intermediary's own authority, so the attacker borrows the defender's privilege without ever violating the intermediary's rules.", "page_ref": "prime:untrusted_input_execution", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source -> attacker input; syntax/instruction influence -> execution crossing.", "slug": "untrusted_input_execution", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires un-inertised input to be treated as control outside its nominal data role."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Data-Control Plane Breach", "one_liner": "Untrusted content crosses into the data channel un-inertised and an interpreter, operating correctly by its own rules, executes it as control, wielding the defender's authority for the attacker.", "page_ref": "prime:data_control_plane_breach", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Semantic role -> data channel; outside instruction -> control reinterpretation.", "slug": "data_control_plane_breach", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires input cues to switch the interpreter from data mode to control mode."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A caller, user, document, website, database field, message, file, or model output can influence syntax or instructions outside the semantic role it was supposed to occupy.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The cost of a confused interpretation is material: unauthorized action, disclosure, privilege use, policy bypass, persistent compromise, corrupted decision-making, or cross-tenant effect.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The cost of a confused interpretation is material: unauthorized action, disclosure, privilege use, policy bypass, persistent compromise, corrupted decision-making, or cross-tenant effect. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The cost of a confused interpretation is material: unauthorized action, disclosure, privilege use, policy bypass, persistent compromise, corrupted decision-making, or cross-tenant effect."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The cost of a confused interpretation is material: unauthorized action, disclosure, privilege use, policy bypass, persistent compromise, corrupted decision-making, or cross-tenant effect."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 16, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-016", "ledger_sha256": "257cdca011003abaffda1067e296ef7c7b43b930d04bd93a5b5855e7dfcb1870"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Control Delegation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:control_delegation", "slug": "control_delegation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a mismatch between where control authority sits and where control-relevant information appears. The center owns the decision, but local units own the timely context. This produces queues, delay, frozen action, unofficial workarounds, and repeated escalation. The system may appear disciplined from the center while failing at the edge.\n\nA central controller can preserve consistency, but it cannot regulate every fast-changing local state. Local units can preserve fit, but unbounded autonomy can create drift, inconsistency, unfairness, or unsafe action. Control Delegation resolves this by designing a governed local control loop rather than choosing between total centralization and unmanaged local freedom.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A central controller is responsible for outcomes across many local situations, but local variation is too fast, context-rich, numerous, or specialized for central observation and approval. Centralized control becomes a bottleneck, local actors wait or improvise without authority, and the system either responds late or fragments into unofficial local workarounds."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime replaces case-by-case central approval with standing operational authority because contingencies require timely local response.", "role_mapping": "Central queue -> case approval; delay/harm -> contingency response need.", "slug": "authority_delegation_under_uncertainty", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b016_a06_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "is too fast, context-rich, numerous, or specialized for central observation and approval. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Central approval or command queues cause response delay, missed opportunity, or preventable harm.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Central approval or command queues cause response delay, missed opportunity, or preventable harm.", "is too fast, context-rich, numerous, or specialized for central observation and approval."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Authority Delegation Under Uncertainty", "one_liner": "Preposition decision authority at operational levels for contingencies.", "page_ref": "prime:authority_delegation_under_uncertainty", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Central queue -> case approval; delay/harm -> contingency response need.", "slug": "authority_delegation_under_uncertainty", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime replaces case-by-case central approval with standing operational authority because contingencies require timely local response."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Central approval or command queues cause response delay, missed opportunity, or preventable harm.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P018-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the local information-holder and central recipient roles.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Local units possess information relevant to a central controller.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the local-to-center information direction.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The information is directed from local units toward receipt by the center.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail a recurring pattern rather than a single transmission failure.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The local-center information failure occurs repeatedly.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires untimely central receipt of locally held information.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The center receives the information too late.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires loss of decision-relevant granularity in central receipt.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The center receives the information at excessive coarseness.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires complete non-receipt by the center.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The center does not receive the information at all.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Local units repeatedly possess information that reaches the center too late, too coarsely, or not at all.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Information repeatedly available locally is not usefully available to the center.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P018-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Delegation may be needed because futures cannot be specified even when the center receives the same current information.", "slug": "authority_delegation_under_uncertainty"}], "residual_id": "r:control_delegation:b016_a06_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b016_a06_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The center owns the decision, but local units own the timely context. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Local units repeatedly possess information that the center receives too late, too coarsely, or not at all.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Local units repeatedly possess information that the center receives too late, too coarsely, or not\nat all.", "The center owns the decision, but local units own the timely context."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Delegation may be needed because futures cannot be specified even when the center receives the same current information.", "slug": "authority_delegation_under_uncertainty"}], "normalized_requirement": "Local units repeatedly possess information that the center receives too late, too coarsely, or not at all.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Local units repeatedly possess information that the center receives too late, too coarsely, or not at all.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P018-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve central and local authority roles without reversing them.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A central controller and subordinate local decision units occupy distinct authority roles.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail the case-allocation mismatch between central handling and local capability.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Cases remain with central control despite being locally decidable.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail that handling those cases contributes to central overload.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The retained case load overloads central control.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail feasible local decision-making together with bounded safety, not unrestricted delegation.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Local units can decide the cases safely when constrained by bounds.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "Central control is overloaded by cases that local units could safely decide within bounds.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Central authority bears an overload-producing case load that local units can safely decide under bounds.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P018-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime can address rare unknowable contingencies without central overload or a recurring case volume.", "slug": "authority_delegation_under_uncertainty"}], "residual_id": "r:control_delegation:b016_a06_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b016_a06_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use Control Delegation when a central controller is overloaded by decisions that are local, time-sensitive, or context-rich. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Central control has become overloaded by cases that local units could safely decide within bounds.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Central control has become overloaded by cases that local units could safely decide within bounds.", "Use Control Delegation when a central controller is overloaded by decisions that are local, time-sensitive, or context-rich."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime can address rare unknowable contingencies without central overload or a recurring case volume.", "slug": "authority_delegation_under_uncertainty"}], "normalized_requirement": "Central control has become overloaded by cases that local units could safely decide within bounds.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Central control has become overloaded by cases that local units could safely decide within bounds.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P018-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the local actor and formal-authority roles.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Local operators or units create the workaround while official authority supplies the mismatched formal arrangement.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail a mismatch between formal authority and operational reality.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Official authority does not correspond to operationally required authority.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve causal direction from mismatch to workaround.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The authority mismatch produces or sustains local workarounds.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail an existing workaround state, not only future workaround risk.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The local workarounds already exist rather than being merely prospective.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "Local workarounds already exist because official authority does not match operational reality.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A mismatch between official authority and operational reality causes local workarounds.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P018-C08-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A delegation envelope can be designed before any unofficial workaround develops.", "slug": "authority_delegation_under_uncertainty"}], "residual_id": "r:control_delegation:b016_a06_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b016_a06_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "system either responds late or fragments into unofficial local workarounds. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Local workarounds already exist because official authority does not match operational reality.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Local workarounds already exist because official authority does not match operational reality.", "system either responds late or fragments into unofficial local workarounds."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "The record was tested against a case with no workaround, but it constitutively says execution reconciles in place when the authoritative plan cannot be enacted and that improvisation becomes structural.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Plan-Execute Gap", "one_liner": "The pathology in which a coarse-grained planning artefact cannot be enacted because the execution layer faces binding fine-grained constraints the planning model never represented — so the fix is constraint propagation and feedback, never a better forecast.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:plan_execute_gap", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "plan_execute_gap"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "plan_execute_gap", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P018-C08-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record directly entails local workarounds caused by mismatch between an authoritative plan and operational constraints, including the already-existing, recurrent character."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Local workarounds already exist because official authority does not match operational reality.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Exceptions vary by site, customer, patient, learner, incident, region, device, or operating condition.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Exceptions vary by site, customer, patient, learner, incident, region, device, or operating condition. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Exceptions vary by site, customer, patient, learner, incident, region, device, or operating condition."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Exceptions vary by site, customer, patient, learner, incident, region, device, or operating\ncondition."}, {"display_text": "The cost of a wrong local action can be bounded and reviewed more easily than the cost of central delay.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This produces queues, delay, frozen action, unofficial workarounds, and repeated escalation. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: The cost of a wrong local action can be bounded and reviewed more easily than the cost of central delay. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The cost of a wrong local action can be bounded and reviewed more easily than the cost of central delay.", "This produces queues, delay, frozen action, unofficial workarounds, and repeated escalation."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The cost of a wrong local action can be bounded and reviewed more easily than the cost of central\ndelay."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 16, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-016", "ledger_sha256": "257cdca011003abaffda1067e296ef7c7b43b930d04bd93a5b5855e7dfcb1870"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Control Surface Creation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:control_surface_creation", "slug": "control_surface_creation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 5 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a gap between known desired change and practical ability to cause that change. The system may have important states such as load, risk, quality, access, speed, cost, staffing, exposure, or eligibility, yet no legitimate pathway through which authorized actors can move those states.\n\nThis produces several recurring symptoms: metrics without action, escalation without authority, improvised hacks, hidden expert bottlenecks, changes that require full redesign, and symbolic buttons that do not actually change anything. The root tension is controllability: the system has states that matter, but its state transitions are not exposed as safe, usable, accountable interventions.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Desired state changes are known, but the system lacks effective levers, actuators, interfaces, or authority points through which those changes can be made deliberately."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P018-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve decision-makers as the observer-controller role.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Decision-makers are the actors who identify and would attempt to change the harmful condition.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail practical epistemic access to the harmful condition.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Decision-makers can identify the harmful condition.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail absence of practical change capability through available controls.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Available controls cannot practically change the harmful condition.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the observed-but-uncontrollable contrast.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Observability is present while controllability is absent for the same harmful condition.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Decision-makers can identify a harmful condition but cannot practically change it with available controls.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A harmful condition is identifiable to decision-makers but not practically controllable through available levers.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P018-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A bypassed safeguard presupposes an existing control and need not mean no practical control is available.", "slug": "bypassed_safeguard"}], "residual_id": "r:control_surface_creation:b016_a07_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b016_a07_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use Control Surface Creation when a desired state change is understood but no practical steering path exists. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Decision-makers can identify a harmful state, trajectory, or risk but cannot practically change it with available controls.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Decision-makers can identify a harmful state, trajectory, or risk but cannot practically change it with available controls.", "Use Control Surface Creation when a desired state change is understood but no practical steering path exists."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A user might initially be unable to diagnose the loop, but the record explicitly says repeated encounter makes it visible while the closed transition graph still supplies no route to the goal.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Navigation loop", "one_liner": "Diagnose a workflow where a user cannot reach their goal by modeling the interface as a directed graph and asking one structural question — is any goal state reachable from the current state? — rather than blaming screen quality or user confusion.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:navigation_loop", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "navigation_loop"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "navigation_loop", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P018-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "The same user can identify the repeated harmful loop yet cannot change it through the available interface controls because the reachable transition graph contains no exit to the goal."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Decision-makers can identify a harmful state, trajectory, or risk but cannot practically change it with available controls.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P018-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must identify the relevant available options as interventions or control actions for the same target system.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "There is a set of interventions available for changing the target system.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must cover the entire available set while allowing different set members to satisfy different listed deficiencies.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "For every available intervention, that intervention is broad, slow, destructive, or requires whole-system redesign.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail the source's only restriction and cannot leave an available intervention that avoids all four deficiencies.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "No available intervention lies outside the named deficiency disjunction as a practically adequate alternative.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Every available intervention is broad, slow, destructive, or requires redesigning the whole system, although different interventions may have different deficiencies.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Every available intervention has at least one severe practical deficiency.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P018-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An accumulated intervention stack can contain many narrow fast controls rather than only broad or destructive ones.", "slug": "intervention_stack_accretion"}], "residual_id": "r:control_surface_creation:b016_a07_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b016_a07_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A team, institution, operator, or system knows the state that should change but must rely on brittle workarounds, expert heroics, full redesign, or broad commands because no bounded lever has been designed. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The only available interventions are broad, slow, destructive, or require redesigning the whole system.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The only available interventions are broad, slow, destructive, or require redesigning the whole system.", "A team, institution, operator, or system knows the state that should change but must rely on brittle workarounds, expert heroics, full redesign, or broad commands because no bounded lever has been designed."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An accumulated intervention stack can contain many narrow fast controls rather than only broad or destructive ones.", "slug": "intervention_stack_accretion"}], "normalized_requirement": "The only available interventions are broad, slow, destructive, or require redesigning the whole system.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The only available interventions are broad, slow, destructive, or require redesigning the whole system.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P018-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve both the control-capability role and its containing carrier.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An existing control capability is distinct from the work practice or carrier that contains it.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail hidden embedding of the control, not simply use of a control by an operator.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The control is buried or implicitly embedded in its carrier rather than exposed as an explicit control surface.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires technical work to be the obscuring carrier.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The control is buried inside technical work.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires informal relationships to be the obscuring carrier.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The control is buried inside informal relationships.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires exceptional manual effort to be the obscuring carrier.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The control is buried inside manual heroics.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires case-specific exceptions to be the obscuring carrier.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The control is buried inside ad hoc exceptions.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Existing control capability is buried inside technical work, informal relationships, manual heroics, or ad hoc exceptions.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Existing controls are embedded in operational carriers that obscure them as explicit control surfaces.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P018-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A work-procedure mismatch need not hide an actionable control surface inside informal labor.", "slug": "procedure_work_mismatch"}], "residual_id": "r:control_surface_creation:b016_a07_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b016_a07_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use Control Surface Creation when a desired state change is understood but no practical steering path exists. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Existing controls are buried inside technical work, informal relationships, manual heroics, or ad hoc exceptions.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Existing controls are buried inside technical work, informal relationships, manual heroics, or ad hoc exceptions.", "Use Control Surface Creation when a desired state change is understood but no practical steering path exists."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A work-procedure mismatch need not hide an actionable control surface inside informal labor.", "slug": "procedure_work_mismatch"}], "normalized_requirement": "Existing controls are buried inside technical work, informal relationships, manual heroics, or ad hoc exceptions.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Existing controls are buried inside technical work, informal relationships, manual heroics, or ad hoc exceptions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P018-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve identity between the local knower and the prospective actor rather than assign knowledge and action to different roles.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The same local operators possess adjustment knowledge and would perform the adjustment.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail actual local knowledge of the required change, not merely local exposure to a problem.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The local operators know what adjustment is needed.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail absence of appropriately bounded permission or decision authority for the informed local operators.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The local operators lack bounded authority to make the adjustment.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must causally connect the authority gap to inability to act safely, not merely report centralized governance.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The absence of bounded authority prevents the local operators from making the adjustment safely.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Local operators know what needs adjustment but cannot make the adjustment safely because they lack bounded authority.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Locally knowledgeable operators lack bounded authority needed for safe adjustment.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P018-C12-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P018-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve identity between the local knower and the prospective actor rather than assign knowledge and action to different roles.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The same local operators possess adjustment knowledge and would perform the adjustment.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail actual local knowledge of the required change, not merely local exposure to a problem.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The local operators know what adjustment is needed.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail absence of the operational tool or interface the informed local operators need.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The local operators lack the operational tools required to make the adjustment.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must causally connect the tooling gap to inability to act safely, not merely report inconvenience.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The absence of tools prevents the local operators from making the adjustment safely.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Local operators know what needs adjustment but cannot make the adjustment safely because they lack the required tools.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Locally knowledgeable operators lack tools needed for safe adjustment.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P018-C12-U2"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A bypassed safeguard presupposes an existing control and does not require an informed operator who lacks bounded authority or a tool.", "slug": "bypassed_safeguard"}], "residual_id": "r:control_surface_creation:b016_a07_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b016_a07_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when the same type of adjustment recurs, when response needs to be faster than redesign, when informal control is already happening unsafely, or when local actors need bounded authority to adapt under changing conditions. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Local operators know what needs adjustment but lack bounded authority or tools to make the adjustment safely.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Local operators know what needs adjustment but lack bounded authority or tools to make the adjustment safely.", "It is especially useful when the same type of adjustment recurs, when response needs to be faster than redesign, when informal control is already happening unsafely, or when local actors need bounded authority to adapt under changing conditions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PARTIALLY_DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A harmless resequencing workaround does not preserve the qualifier that unauthorized adjustment is unsafe.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Plan-Execute Gap", "one_liner": "The pathology in which a coarse-grained planning artefact cannot be enacted because the execution layer faces binding fine-grained constraints the planning model never represented — so the fix is constraint propagation and feedback, never a better forecast.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:plan_execute_gap", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O4"], "guard_type": "OTHER", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "unsafe_unauthorized_local_adjustment", "predicate": "Unauthorized improvisation cannot implement the required local adjustment safely.", "rationale": "Independent exact-record review found no complete candidate instance, with the emitted qualifier if any, that falsifies the retained DNF branch."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "plan_execute_gap"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "Unauthorized improvisation cannot implement the required local adjustment safely."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "plan_execute_gap", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P018-C12-U1", "why_it_fits": "The DSA supplies knowledgeable execution and missing authority; one safety guard makes that gap prevent safe adjustment."}], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 2, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 1, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A bypassed safeguard presupposes an existing control and does not require an informed operator who lacks bounded authority or a tool.", "slug": "bypassed_safeguard"}], "normalized_requirement": "Local operators know what needs adjustment but lack bounded authority or tools to make the adjustment safely.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "PARTIAL_EXISTING_DSA_GROUNDING", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation grounded 1 of 2 eligible atomic units; the remaining unit or units stayed open."}, "predicate": "Local operators know what needs adjustment but lack bounded authority or tools to make the adjustment safely.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P018-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail recurrence rather than a single emergency.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The emergency occurs repeatedly across episodes.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must relate recurrence to the prospect of repeated ad hoc escalation rather than assert a one-time workaround.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Without the repeatable intervention point, response would rely on improvised escalation each time.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail the necessity of a reusable intervention point without requiring proof that it is already absent.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A repeatable intervention point is necessary for the recurring emergency.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the repeatable-versus-improvised response contrast.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A repeatable intervention point is needed in place of improvised escalation each time.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "A recurring emergency requires a repeatable intervention point rather than improvised escalation each time.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Recurring emergency episodes make a repeatable intervention point necessary in place of per-episode improvised escalation.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P018-C13-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Intervention accretion can arise without recurring emergencies or the absence of a repeatable control point.", "slug": "intervention_stack_accretion"}], "residual_id": "r:control_surface_creation:b016_a07_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b016_a07_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This produces several recurring symptoms: metrics without action, escalation without authority, improvised hacks, hidden expert bottlenecks, changes that require full redesign, and symbolic buttons that do not actually change anything. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A recurring emergency requires a repeatable intervention point rather than improvised escalation each time.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A recurring emergency requires a repeatable intervention point rather than improvised escalation each time.", "This produces several recurring symptoms: metrics without action, escalation without authority, improvised hacks, hidden expert bottlenecks, changes that require full redesign, and symbolic buttons that do not actually change anything."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Intervention accretion can arise without recurring emergencies or the absence of a repeatable control point.", "slug": "intervention_stack_accretion"}], "normalized_requirement": "A recurring emergency requires a repeatable intervention point rather than improvised escalation each time.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A recurring emergency requires a repeatable intervention point rather than improvised escalation each time.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 16, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-016", "ledger_sha256": "257cdca011003abaffda1067e296ef7c7b43b930d04bd93a5b5855e7dfcb1870"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Controlled Demixing and Domain Formation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:controlled_demixing_and_domain_formation", "slug": "controlled_demixing_and_domain_formation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 2 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 2}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A nominally mixed substrate either fails to self-sort into useful coexisting domains, demixes through the wrong pathway or morphology, or separates unintentionally during manufacture, storage, or operation. Local interaction preferences, composition, transport, history, and interfaces jointly create nonlinear and path-dependent behavior that cannot be governed by endpoint conditions alone.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A nominally mixed substrate either fails to self-sort into useful coexisting domains, demixes through the wrong pathway or morphology, or separates unintentionally during manufacture, storage, or operation. Local interaction preferences, composition, transport, history, and interfaces jointly create nonlinear and path-dependent behavior that cannot be governed by endpoint conditions alone."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires mobile heterogeneous components and a threshold at which like-with-like interactions outweigh mixing.", "role_mapping": "Constituents -> mixture components; redistribution -> spontaneous sorting; interaction difference -> asymmetry.", "slug": "phase_separation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b016_a08_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Constituents can redistribute and their unlike interactions differ materially from like-like interactions. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Constituents can redistribute and their unlike interactions differ materially from like-like interactions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Phase Separation", "one_liner": "A previously mixed system spontaneously demixes into distinct, spatially segregated regions once like-with-like interactions outweigh mixing above a threshold.", "page_ref": "prime:phase_separation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Constituents -> mixture components; redistribution -> spontaneous sorting; interaction difference -> asymmetry.", "slug": "phase_separation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires mobile heterogeneous components and a threshold at which like-with-like interactions outweigh mixing."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Constituents can redistribute and their unlike interactions differ materially from like-like interactions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires spontaneous sorting by nucleation-and-growth or spinodal decomposition into coexisting domains with evolving interfaces.", "role_mapping": "Nucleation/spinodal -> sorting route; domains -> phases; coarsening -> interface evolution.", "slug": "phase_separation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b016_a08_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Spontaneous or induced domains evolve through nucleation, spinodal amplification, coalescence, coarsening, settling, or remixing. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Spontaneous or induced domains evolve through nucleation, spinodal amplification, coalescence, coarsening, settling, or remixing."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Phase Separation", "one_liner": "A previously mixed system spontaneously demixes into distinct, spatially segregated regions once like-with-like interactions outweigh mixing above a threshold.", "page_ref": "prime:phase_separation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Nucleation/spinodal -> sorting route; domains -> phases; coarsening -> interface evolution.", "slug": "phase_separation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires spontaneous sorting by nucleation-and-growth or spinodal decomposition into coexisting domains with evolving interfaces."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Spontaneous or induced domains evolve through nucleation, spinodal amplification, coalescence, coarsening, settling, or remixing.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A coexistence, metastability, or instability boundary is reachable with legitimate controllable variables.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: A coexistence, metastability, or instability boundary is reachable with legitimate controllable variables. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A coexistence, metastability, or instability boundary is reachable with legitimate controllable variables."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "A coexistence, metastability, or instability boundary is reachable with legitimate controllable variables."}, {"display_text": "Function depends on phase composition, purity, domain scale, topology, or interface properties.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The system tends to reduce unfavorable mixing and interfacial cost, while the intervention often needs a particular nonequilibrium distribution, finite domain scale, topology, purity, reversibility, and function. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Function depends on phase composition, purity, domain scale, topology, or interface properties. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Function depends on phase composition, purity, domain scale, topology, or interface properties.", "The system tends to reduce unfavorable mixing and interfacial cost, while the intervention often needs a particular nonequilibrium distribution, finite domain scale, topology, purity, reversibility, and function."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Function depends on phase composition, purity, domain scale, topology, or interface properties."}, {"display_text": "Uncontrolled separation can concentrate hazards, reject valuable material, or produce irreversible damage.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Driving separation harder may speed onset but worsen defects, coarsening, trapping, or hazard concentration; suppressing it may preserve mixing but eliminate the desired function. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Uncontrolled separation can concentrate hazards, reject valuable material, or produce irreversible damage. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Uncontrolled separation can concentrate hazards, reject valuable material, or produce irreversible damage.", "Driving separation harder may speed onset but worsen defects, coarsening, trapping, or hazard concentration; suppressing it may preserve mixing but eliminate the desired function."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Uncontrolled separation can concentrate hazards, reject valuable material, or produce irreversible damage."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 16, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-016", "ledger_sha256": "257cdca011003abaffda1067e296ef7c7b43b930d04bd93a5b5855e7dfcb1870"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Controlled Inheritance Propagation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:controlled_inheritance_propagation", "slug": "controlled_inheritance_propagation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 5, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system needs descendants to share stable structure with ancestors without manually copying every property, but uncontrolled inheritance makes default propagation invisible. Ancestor changes ripple into descendants without review; local overrides become scattered exceptions; descendants appear substitutable while violating ancestor invariants; and inherited risk travels through the same channel that was designed for efficient reuse.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system needs descendants to share stable structure with ancestors without manually copying every property, but uncontrolled inheritance makes default propagation invisible. Ancestor changes ripple into descendants without review; local overrides become scattered exceptions; descendants appear substitutable while violating ancestor invariants; and inherited risk travels through the same channel that was designed for efficient reuse."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a directed asymmetric lineage relation from parent to derivative across precisely these substrates.", "role_mapping": "Parent/ancestor/template -> source entity; child/instance/product -> derivative.", "slug": "inheritance", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b016_a09_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The relation must be more than a historical label; descendants actually receive structure from the ancestor. In this condition set, the requirement is: A parent-child, ancestor-descendant, template-instance, class-subclass, platform-product, or policy-locality relation exists.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A parent-child, ancestor-descendant, template-instance, class-subclass, platform-product, or policy-locality relation exists."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Inheritance", "one_liner": "Transmitting structure along a lineage by default, with selective override.", "page_ref": "prime:inheritance", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Parent/ancestor/template -> source entity; child/instance/product -> derivative.", "slug": "inheritance", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a directed asymmetric lineage relation from parent to derivative across precisely these substrates."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A parent-child, ancestor-descendant, template-instance, class-subclass, platform-product, or policy-locality relation exists.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires the parent's structure to carry to derivatives by default without re-derivation.", "role_mapping": "Shared default -> inherited structure; descendants -> derivatives.", "slug": "inheritance", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b016_a09_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Inheritance is useful when common structure should not be restated manually in every case. In this condition set, the requirement is: Most descendants should follow a shared default.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Most descendants should follow a shared default."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Inheritance", "one_liner": "Transmitting structure along a lineage by default, with selective override.", "page_ref": "prime:inheritance", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Shared default -> inherited structure; descendants -> derivatives.", "slug": "inheritance", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires the parent's structure to carry to derivatives by default without re-derivation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Most descendants should follow a shared default.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime permits selective override and extension but a valid lineage can transmit its default without any descendant actually needing an exception.", "slug": "inheritance"}], "residual_id": "r:controlled_inheritance_propagation:b016_a09_c3", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b016_a09_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The archetype becomes necessary when variation must be allowed without losing the common basis. In this condition set, the requirement is: Some descendants legitimately need local exceptions.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Some descendants legitimately need local exceptions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime permits selective override and extension but a valid lineage can transmit its default without any descendant actually needing an exception.", "slug": "inheritance"}], "normalized_requirement": "Some descendants legitimately need local exceptions.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Some descendants legitimately need local exceptions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's downward-coupling liability permits parent changes to propagate to and break existing derivatives.", "role_mapping": "Ancestor change -> parent mutation; descendant effect -> downward propagation.", "slug": "inheritance", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b016_a09_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Live or repeated propagation creates greater governance burden than a one-time copy. In this condition set, the requirement is: Ancestor changes can affect descendants after the descendant has been created.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Ancestor changes can affect descendants after the descendant has been created."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Inheritance", "one_liner": "Transmitting structure along a lineage by default, with selective override.", "page_ref": "prime:inheritance", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Ancestor change -> parent mutation; descendant effect -> downward propagation.", "slug": "inheritance", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's downward-coupling liability permits parent changes to propagate to and break existing derivatives."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Ancestor changes can affect descendants after the descendant has been created.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime includes a substitutability invariant and reads every derivative as parent contribution plus override delta.", "role_mapping": "Inherited versus local -> parent structure plus override; compatibility -> substitutability.", "slug": "inheritance", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b016_a09_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A reviewer needs to reconstruct why a descendant has a property. In this condition set, the requirement is: Substitutability, compatibility, or auditability depends on knowing what is inherited versus locally defined.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Substitutability, compatibility, or auditability depends on knowing what is inherited versus locally defined."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Inheritance", "one_liner": "Transmitting structure along a lineage by default, with selective override.", "page_ref": "prime:inheritance", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Inherited versus local -> parent structure plus override; compatibility -> substitutability.", "slug": "inheritance", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime includes a substitutability invariant and reads every derivative as parent contribution plus override delta."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Substitutability, compatibility, or auditability depends on knowing what is inherited versus locally defined.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires an inheritance channel to carry a latent origin defect, assumption, liability, or constraint into the new system.", "role_mapping": "Inherited default -> borrowed substrate property; listed risk -> latent origin condition.", "slug": "inherited_substrate_risk", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b016_a09_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The same channel that preserves useful structure can also transmit hidden liabilities. In this condition set, the requirement is: Inherited defaults can carry risk, privilege, debt, bias, assumptions, or obsolete constraints.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Inherited defaults can carry risk, privilege, debt, bias, assumptions, or obsolete constraints."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Inherited-Substrate Risk", "one_liner": "A system built on a borrowed or inherited substrate carries forward latent conditions of the substrate's origin through an inheritance channel that the new system's audit boundary does not cross, so the risk concentrates exactly where attention does not.", "page_ref": "prime:inherited_substrate_risk", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Inherited default -> borrowed substrate property; listed risk -> latent origin condition.", "slug": "inherited_substrate_risk", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires an inheritance channel to carry a latent origin defect, assumption, liability, or constraint into the new system."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Inherited defaults can carry risk, privilege, debt, bias, assumptions, or obsolete constraints.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Multiple inheritance levels, mixins, overlays, policy layers, templates, or defaults can collide.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Conflict rules are needed before the cascade becomes accidental. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Multiple inheritance levels, mixins, overlays, policy layers, templates, or defaults can collide. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Multiple inheritance levels, mixins, overlays, policy layers, templates, or defaults can collide.", "Conflict rules are needed before the cascade becomes accidental."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Multiple inheritance levels, mixins, overlays, policy layers, templates, or defaults can collide."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 16, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-016", "ledger_sha256": "257cdca011003abaffda1067e296ef7c7b43b930d04bd93a5b5855e7dfcb1870"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Controlled Phase Transition", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:controlled_phase_transition", "slug": "controlled_phase_transition"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 1 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 1}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is that the system must leave a known regime before the new regime is fully reliable. During that crossing, the system may lose continuity, confuse authority, break dependencies, overload support channels, trigger resistance, or relapse into old behavior. The transition is neither simply the old state nor simply the target state; it is a temporary and unstable configuration with its own failure modes.\n\nThe social and governance problem is equally important. Actors may optimize for their local crossing while the whole system becomes inconsistent. Leaders may declare success at cutover even though the new state is not stable. Technical teams may define rollback while users experience irreversible disruption. The archetype counters these risks by designing the crossing as a governed state change.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system must leave one regime and enter another, but the crossing period can produce instability, service loss, resistance, rupture, relapse, or partial adoption if the transition is treated as a simple switch rather than a managed change of operating state."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires regime-specific rules, feedbacks, constraints, and effective causal responses to differ across stable states.", "role_mapping": "Old/new states -> regimes; listed differences -> regime-specific rules.", "slug": "regime_change", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b016_a10_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The old and new regimes should differ in operating rules, dependencies, incentives, roles, support needs, or failure behavior. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The old and new states have different operating rules, dependencies, incentives, roles, performance conditions, or failure modes.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The old and new states have different operating rules, dependencies, incentives, roles, performance conditions, or failure modes.", "The old and new regimes should differ in operating rules, dependencies, incentives, roles, support needs, or failure behavior."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Regime Change", "one_liner": "A discontinuous flip of a system from one stable operating regime to a qualitatively different one, where the same inputs produce fundamentally different responses on either side of a feedback-driven threshold.", "page_ref": "prime:regime_change", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Old/new states -> regimes; listed differences -> regime-specific rules.", "slug": "regime_change", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires regime-specific rules, feedbacks, constraints, and effective causal responses to differ across stable states."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The old and new states have different operating rules, dependencies, incentives, roles, performance conditions, or failure modes.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The transition is desirable or necessary, unlike a tipping point that should be prevented.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: The transition is desirable or necessary, unlike a tipping point that should be prevented. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The transition is desirable or necessary, unlike a tipping point that should be prevented."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "The transition is desirable or necessary, unlike a tipping point that should be prevented."}, {"display_text": "Unmanaged crossing could cause instability, loss of continuity, role confusion, technical failure, ecological shock, relapse, or social resistance.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "During that crossing, the system may lose continuity, confuse authority, break dependencies, overload support channels, trigger resistance, or relapse into old behavior. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Unmanaged crossing could cause instability, loss of continuity, role confusion, technical failure, ecological shock, relapse, or social resistance. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Unmanaged crossing could cause instability, loss of continuity, role confusion, technical failure, ecological shock, relapse, or social resistance.", "During that crossing, the system may lose continuity, confuse authority, break dependencies, overload support channels, trigger resistance, or relapse into old behavior."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Unmanaged crossing could cause instability, loss of continuity, role confusion, technical failure, ecological shock, relapse, or social resistance."}, {"display_text": "The system can prepare conditions, sequence the crossing, scaffold intermediate states, and monitor progress rather than relying on a single irreversible leap.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Controlled Phase Transition applies when crossing itself creates risk and must be prepared, sequenced, monitored, scaffolded, and stabilized. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: The system can prepare conditions, sequence the crossing, scaffold intermediate states, and monitor progress rather than relying on a single irreversible leap. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The system can prepare conditions, sequence the crossing, scaffold intermediate states, and monitor progress rather than relying on a single irreversible leap.", "Controlled Phase Transition applies when crossing itself creates risk and must be prepared, sequenced, monitored, scaffolded, and stabilized."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The system can prepare conditions, sequence the crossing, scaffold intermediate states, and monitor progress rather than relying on a single irreversible leap."}, {"display_text": "There are identifiable completion criteria for the target regime and identifiable risk signals during the crossing.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The system needs enough commitment to leave the old regime, but enough caution to survive the crossing and stabilize the new one. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: There are identifiable completion criteria for the target regime and identifiable risk signals during the crossing. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["There are identifiable completion criteria for the target regime and identifiable risk signals during the crossing.", "The system needs enough commitment to leave the old regime, but enough caution to survive the crossing and stabilize the new one."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "There are identifiable completion criteria for the target regime and identifiable risk signals during the crossing."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 16, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-016", "ledger_sha256": "257cdca011003abaffda1067e296ef7c7b43b930d04bd93a5b5855e7dfcb1870"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Controlled Randomization", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:controlled_randomization", "slug": "controlled_randomization"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 5, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 2, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 2 of 5 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a selection or assignment process that looks orderly but is actually biased, gameable, overconfident, or stuck. A deterministic rule may privilege whoever is visible, first in line, politically connected, easiest to measure, already advantaged, or easiest for operators to handle. A deterministic comparison may confuse treatment effects with preexisting differences between groups. A deterministic audit schedule may teach actors exactly when not to misbehave.\n\nIn simplification terms, randomization can reduce the burden of impossible ranking. The system no longer has to invent fragile criteria for every residual distinction. But that simplification is dangerous if it ignores eligibility, safety, rights, consent, and accountability. Controlled Randomization solves the selection problem only when the surrounding controls are explicit.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A deterministic rule or informal selection process is biased, predictable, gameable, unfairly arbitrary, confounded, or too locked into current assumptions, yet the system still needs a decision, allocation, comparison, sample, or exploration path."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P018-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve eligible allocands as the objects competing for selection.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The competing allocands are eligible candidates, options, or equivalent selectable entities.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail excess eligible demand relative to capacity, not merely scarcity without eligible contenders.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The number or demand of eligible allocands exceeds available capacity.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail exhaustion of legitimate discriminating criteria among the remaining eligible set.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Legitimate criteria cannot meaningfully rank the eligible allocands any further.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must connect both constraints to one allocation decision rather than separate populations.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Both the capacity shortfall and ranking tie apply to the same eligible selection set.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Eligible candidates or options exceed capacity, and legitimate criteria cannot meaningfully rank them further.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Capacity is insufficient for all eligible allocands and legitimate criteria do not resolve the remaining selection tie.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P018-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A randomized experiment can have ample capacity and a scientifically chosen assignment without a ranking tie.", "slug": "randomization"}], "residual_id": "r:controlled_randomization:b016_a11_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b016_a11_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "If two candidates are genuinely tied after legitimate criteria have been applied, adding a fake decimal score may be less honest than a documented random tie-break. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Eligible candidates or options exceed available capacity and legitimate criteria cannot meaningfully rank them further.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Eligible candidates or options exceed available capacity and legitimate criteria cannot meaningfully rank them further.", "If two candidates are genuinely tied after legitimate criteria have been applied, adding a fake decimal score may be less honest than a documented random tie-break."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A randomized experiment can have ample capacity and a scientifically chosen assignment without a ranking tie.", "slug": "randomization"}], "normalized_requirement": "Eligible candidates or options exceed available capacity and legitimate criteria cannot meaningfully rank them further.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Eligible candidates or options exceed available capacity and legitimate criteria cannot meaningfully rank them further.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires stochastic treatment assignment independent of measured and unmeasured characteristics to eliminate confounding from systematic group differences.", "role_mapping": "Hidden differences -> unmeasured covariates; deterministic comparison -> systematic assignment; chance -> randomization.", "slug": "randomization", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b016_a11_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A deterministic comparison may confuse treatment effects with preexisting differences between groups. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Hidden differences between groups or cases would bias a deterministic comparison.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Hidden differences between groups or cases would bias a deterministic comparison.", "A deterministic comparison may confuse treatment effects with preexisting differences between groups."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Randomization", "one_liner": "Assign by chance.", "page_ref": "prime:randomization", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Hidden differences -> unmeasured covariates; deterministic comparison -> systematic assignment; chance -> randomization.", "slug": "randomization", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires stochastic treatment assignment independent of measured and unmeasured characteristics to eliminate confounding from systematic group differences."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Hidden differences between groups or cases would bias a deterministic comparison.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P019-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require an operational rule or process that determines treatment, ordering, selection, or allocation.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A rule or process governs operational selection, ordering, assignment, enforcement, recommendation, audit, or resource allocation.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require affected participants to be able to anticipate how the rule will operate, not merely an analyst to describe it afterward.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The governing rule or process is predictable to participants affected by it.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require a real gaming opportunity created for participants; observed gaming is not required.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Affected participants are able to adapt their behavior strategically to game the predictable rule.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require predictability to create or materially enable strategic exploitation, rather than merely coexist with it.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The rule’s predictability enables the gaming opportunity.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "A predictable rule lets participants game audits, queues, assignments, enforcement, recommendations, or resource allocation.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "predictability of an operational selection rule enables participant gaming", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P019-C01-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime uses concealed stochastic assignment but does not require a prior predictable rule, actual gaming opportunity, or any listed operational domain.", "slug": "randomization"}], "residual_id": "r:controlled_randomization:b016_a11_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b016_a11_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A deterministic rule or informal selection process is biased, predictable, gameable, unfairly arbitrary, confounded, or too locked into current assumptions, yet the system still needs a decision, allocation, comparison, sample, or exploration path. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A predictable rule lets participants game audits, queues, assignments, enforcement, recommendations, or resource allocation.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A predictable rule lets participants game audits, queues, assignments, enforcement, recommendations, or resource allocation.", "A deterministic rule or informal selection process is biased, predictable, gameable, unfairly arbitrary, confounded, or too locked into current assumptions, yet the system still needs a decision, allocation, comparison, sample, or exploration path."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime uses concealed stochastic assignment but does not require a prior predictable rule, actual gaming opportunity, or any listed operational domain.", "slug": "randomization"}], "normalized_requirement": "A predictable rule lets participants game audits, queues, assignments, enforcement, recommendations, or resource allocation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A predictable rule lets participants game audits, queues, assignments, enforcement, recommendations, or resource allocation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P019-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require recurring decisions with genuine alternatives about which information can still be learned.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A system repeatedly chooses among two or more alternatives under uncertainty.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require repeated use of the presently favored option, not one isolated exploitative choice.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The system repeatedly selects or exploits its current best guess.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require the other alternatives to be sampled too little to sustain learning about them.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Competing alternatives receive insufficient or no exploration.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require loss of information gain about alternatives, not merely lower short-term reward.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The system ceases or materially reduces learning about the alternatives.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require the exploit-only policy to produce the failure to learn about alternatives.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Repeated exploitation of the current best guess causes the learning loss.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "A system repeatedly exploits current best guesses and therefore stops learning about alternatives.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "repeated exploitation of the current best guess suppresses learning about alternatives", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P019-C02-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Experimental assignment can test a fixed contrast without a prior exploit-only policy or adaptive learning problem.", "slug": "randomization"}], "residual_id": "r:controlled_randomization:b016_a11_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b016_a11_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A system repeatedly exploits current best guesses and therefore stops learning about alternatives. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A system repeatedly exploits current best guesses and therefore stops learning about alternatives."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Experimental assignment can test a fixed contrast without a prior exploit-only policy or adaptive learning problem.", "slug": "randomization"}], "normalized_requirement": "A system repeatedly exploits current best guesses and therefore stops learning about alternatives.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A system repeatedly exploits current best guesses and therefore stops learning about alternatives.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B5", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P019-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O3", "O7"], ["O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O2", "O3", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This subject branch is satisfied only by a manual selection process.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The selection process is manual.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This subject branch is satisfied only when the selector exercises discretion.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The selection process is discretionary.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require the selected process characteristic to cause the outcome, not merely accompany it.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The manual or discretionary character of selection produces the selected adverse outcome.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This outcome branch preserves perceived favoritism without requiring proof of actual favoritism.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The caused outcome is perceived favoritism.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when the selection process produces conflict.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The caused outcome is conflict.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when comparable subjects receive inconsistent treatment.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The caused outcome is inconsistent treatment.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when the selection judgment is unavailable or opaque to review.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The caused outcome is judgment that cannot be reviewed.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Manual or discretionary selection produces perceived favoritism, conflict, inconsistent treatment, or unreviewable judgment.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "manual or discretionary selection causes one named legitimacy or consistency failure", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P019-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Randomized causal assignment need not replace a discretionary process or address perceived favoritism.", "slug": "randomization"}], "residual_id": "r:controlled_randomization:b016_a11_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b016_a11_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The clearest cases are residual ties, scarce allocation among equally eligible candidates, hidden confounding in comparisons, predictable audits or inspections, exploration under uncertainty, and selection processes where discretion invites real or perceived favoritism. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Manual or discretionary selection produces perceived favoritism, conflict, inconsistent treatment, or unreviewable judgment.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Manual or discretionary selection produces perceived favoritism, conflict, inconsistent treatment, or unreviewable judgment.", "The clearest cases are residual ties, scarce allocation among equally eligible candidates, hidden confounding in comparisons, predictable audits or inspections, exploration under uncertainty, and selection processes where discretion invites real or perceived favoritism."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A principled exception would preserve a general rule for like cases, but the exact record explicitly excludes principled exceptions and requires self-serving asymmetric treatment.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Special Pleading", "one_liner": "The fallacy of exempting a favored case from a general standard the arguer just invoked, without a principled basis — a consistency violation under self-serving direction, exposed by asking whether the arguer would grant the same exception to an opponent.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:special_pleading", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "special_pleading"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "special_pleading", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P019-C03-U1", "why_it_fits": "Special pleading universally entails the discretionary branch and the inconsistent-treatment branch under one causal exception relation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Manual or discretionary selection produces perceived favoritism, conflict, inconsistent treatment, or unreviewable judgment.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 5", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "DISJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Full enumeration, full review, or exact prioritization is too costly, but a random sample or random assignment can be bounded and audited.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "If an audit schedule is perfectly predictable, random selection can reveal blind spots and deter gaming. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: Full enumeration, full review, or exact prioritization is too costly, but a random sample or random assignment can be bounded and audited. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Full enumeration, full review, or exact prioritization is too costly, but a random sample or random assignment can be bounded and audited.", "If an audit schedule is perfectly predictable, random selection can reveal blind spots and deter gaming."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Full enumeration, full review, or exact prioritization is too costly, but a random sample or random assignment can be bounded and audited."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 16, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-016", "ledger_sha256": "257cdca011003abaffda1067e296ef7c7b43b930d04bd93a5b5855e7dfcb1870"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Controlled Reentry", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:controlled_reentry", "slug": "controlled_reentry"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 1 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 1}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A recovering or suspended system remains vulnerable enough that immediate full restoration could recreate overload, relapse, instability, contamination, or failure.", "explanation_source": {"field": "diagnostic_head", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A recovering or suspended system remains vulnerable enough that immediate full restoration could recreate overload, relapse, instability, contamination, or failure."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "This branch preserves the complete remedy-free diagnostic route; goals, feasibility clauses, gates, deployment constraints, and supporting context remain outside the DNF."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "EXT001-C023", "dnf": [["EXT001-U023-O1"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"obligation_id": "EXT001-U023-O1", "predicate": "Immediate full restoration could recreate the prior failure mode or destabilize fragile recovery."}], "predicate": "Immediate full restoration could recreate the prior failure mode or destabilize fragile recovery.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Immediate full restoration could recreate the prior failure mode or destabilize fragile recovery.", "unit_id": "EXT001-U023"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"catalog_exhaustion": "CONDITION_LEVEL", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact record describes an intervention, control, or achieved configuration rather than a pre-existing situation that necessarily entails the atom.", "slug": "recovery"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Immediate full restoration could recreate the prior failure mode or destabilize fragile recovery.", "slug": "memory_consolidation"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Immediate full restoration could recreate the prior failure mode or destabilize fragile recovery.", "slug": "replay"}], "residual_id": "EXT001:controlled_reentry:C02", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding."}}, "condition_id": "ext001_controlled_reentry_a02", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored essence_one_line, compression_statement, components fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: Immediate full restoration could recreate the prior failure mode or destabilize fragile recovery.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Immediate full restoration could recreate the prior failure mode or destabilize fragile recovery."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact record describes an intervention, control, or achieved configuration rather than a pre-existing situation that necessarily entails the atom.", "slug": "recovery"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Immediate full restoration could recreate the prior failure mode or destabilize fragile recovery.", "slug": "memory_consolidation"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Immediate full restoration could recreate the prior failure mode or destabilize fragile recovery.", "slug": "replay"}], "normalized_requirement": "Immediate full restoration could recreate the prior failure mode or destabilize fragile recovery.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Immediate full restoration could recreate the prior failure mode or destabilize fragile recovery.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The system is recovering from interruption, degradation, isolation, shutdown, or a protective suspension.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored essence_one_line, compression_statement, components fields; the source file was not modified. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The system is recovering from interruption, degradation, isolation, shutdown, or a protective suspension. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The system is recovering from interruption, degradation, isolation, shutdown, or a protective suspension.", "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored essence_one_line, compression_statement, components fields; the source file was not modified."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "The system is recovering from interruption, degradation, isolation, shutdown, or a protective suspension."}, {"display_text": "Return can be staged, observed, and aborted at defined checkpoints.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored essence_one_line, compression_statement, components fields; the source file was not modified. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: Return can be staged, observed, and aborted at defined checkpoints. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Return can be staged, observed, and aborted at defined checkpoints.", "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored essence_one_line, compression_statement, components fields; the source file was not modified."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Return can be staged, observed, and aborted at defined checkpoints."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"candidate_ledger_sha256": "96f72d2139077fd57bf795048ebef33b3fd574b20963170080ec916b5b3b92fe", "extension_id": "new-archetypes-extension-001", "ledger_id": "prime-production-v1.2-extension-001", "ledger_sha256": "9644520614744632d1d36da44b1acd77ce432852c6083eb871203521c166efce"}, "base_projection_sha256": "841e0c7f3cb8e8054475ad29a8a14745a416b4fc115559a44878b94292e673ec", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "ca09ed9fe1598ce7072755b530de5553f5ee0a7cd64ae82d9e4a4e2149a37788", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Controlled Stress Relief", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:controlled_stress_relief", "slug": "controlled_stress_relief"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is trapped accumulation. A system receives pressure, obligation, conflict, heat, fatigue, or backlog faster than it can dissipate it. For a while, the system may still appear functional. Then the pressure seeks an outlet: a vessel cracks, a worker burns out, a queue collapses, a borrower defaults, a crowd erupts, a dam overtops, or a relationship breaks.\n\nThe dangerous feature is not stress alone. Stress can be useful. The danger is stress without a legitimate relief path, especially when weak points are hidden or politically inconvenient to name.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Tension or pressure has accumulated and will likely release, but uncontrolled release would cause damage."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires internal stress or load to accumulate over time behind inadequate dissipation until a finite threshold is approached.", "role_mapping": "Listed pressure/debt/etc. -> accumulated load; cannot hold -> rupture threshold.", "slug": "stress_rupture", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b016_a12_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system receives pressure, obligation, conflict, heat, fatigue, or backlog faster than it can dissipate it. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A system has accumulated pressure, fatigue, resentment, backlog, debt, heat, flow, obligation, or conflict that cannot be held indefinitely.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A system has accumulated pressure, fatigue, resentment, backlog, debt, heat, flow, obligation, or conflict that cannot be held indefinitely.", "A system receives pressure, obligation, conflict, heat, fatigue, or backlog faster than it can dissipate it."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Stress and Rupture", "one_liner": "Accumulated tension leads to break.", "page_ref": "prime:stress_rupture", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Listed pressure/debt/etc. -> accumulated load; cannot hold -> rupture threshold.", "slug": "stress_rupture", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires internal stress or load to accumulate over time behind inadequate dissipation until a finite threshold is approached."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A system has accumulated pressure, fatigue, resentment, backlog, debt, heat, flow, obligation, or conflict that cannot be held indefinitely.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires rapid catastrophic release at a finite fracture threshold after hidden accumulation.", "role_mapping": "Weak point -> rupture locus; listed breakdown -> catastrophic release.", "slug": "stress_rupture", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b016_a12_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Then the pressure seeks an outlet: a vessel cracks, a worker burns out, a queue collapses, a borrower defaults, a crowd erupts, a dam overtops, or a relationship breaks. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The likely uncontrolled outlet is a weak point: rupture, strike, explosion, default, burnout, outage, breakdown, revolt, crash, or relational break.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The likely uncontrolled outlet is a weak point: rupture, strike, explosion, default, burnout, outage, breakdown, revolt, crash, or relational break.", "Then the pressure seeks an outlet: a vessel cracks, a worker burns out, a queue collapses, a borrower defaults, a crowd erupts, a dam overtops, or a relationship breaks."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Stress and Rupture", "one_liner": "Accumulated tension leads to break.", "page_ref": "prime:stress_rupture", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Weak point -> rupture locus; listed breakdown -> catastrophic release.", "slug": "stress_rupture", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires rapid catastrophic release at a finite fracture threshold after hidden accumulation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The likely uncontrolled outlet is a weak point: rupture, strike, explosion, default, burnout, outage, breakdown, revolt, crash, or relational break.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires locked stress to keep accumulating while threshold crossing releases it rapidly and catastrophically through the system.", "role_mapping": "Suppression -> load locking; hidden stress -> accumulation; unrestricted release -> rupture propagation.", "slug": "stress_rupture", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b016_a12_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Tension or pressure has accumulated and will likely release, but uncontrolled release would cause damage. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Suppression would increase hidden stress, while unrestricted release would injure people, damage assets, cascade into adjacent systems, or destroy trust.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Suppression would increase hidden stress, while unrestricted release would injure people, damage assets, cascade into adjacent systems, or destroy trust.", "Tension or pressure has accumulated and will likely release, but uncontrolled release would cause damage."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Stress and Rupture", "one_liner": "Accumulated tension leads to break.", "page_ref": "prime:stress_rupture", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Suppression -> load locking; hidden stress -> accumulation; unrestricted release -> rupture propagation.", "slug": "stress_rupture", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires locked stress to keep accumulating while threshold crossing releases it rapidly and catastrophically through the system."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Suppression would increase hidden stress, while unrestricted release would injure people, damage assets, cascade into adjacent systems, or destroy trust.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A lower-risk channel can be opened deliberately before the rupture threshold is crossed.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: A lower-risk channel can be opened deliberately before the rupture threshold is crossed. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A lower-risk channel can be opened deliberately before the rupture threshold is crossed."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "A lower-risk channel can be opened deliberately before the rupture threshold is crossed."}, {"display_text": "The release can be monitored, paced, bounded, paused, or redirected if secondary effects appear.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: The release can be monitored, paced, bounded, paused, or redirected if secondary effects appear. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The release can be monitored, paced, bounded, paused, or redirected if secondary effects appear."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The release can be monitored, paced, bounded, paused, or redirected if secondary effects appear."}, {"display_text": "The organization or operator is willing to treat relief as a safety function rather than as failure, indulgence, or loss of control.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: The organization or operator is willing to treat relief as a safety function rather than as failure, indulgence, or loss of control. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The organization or operator is willing to treat relief as a safety function rather than as failure, indulgence, or loss of control."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The organization or operator is willing to treat relief as a safety function rather than as failure, indulgence, or loss of control."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 16, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-016", "ledger_sha256": "257cdca011003abaffda1067e296ef7c7b43b930d04bd93a5b5855e7dfcb1870"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Convergence Guidance", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:convergence_guidance", "slug": "convergence_guidance"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 5, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 3, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 3, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 3 of 5 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is unmanaged update dynamics. A process contains repeated change, but the changes are not sufficiently oriented. Each cycle may produce information, disagreement, motion, or local improvement, yet the overall path does not become more stable.\n\nThis usually happens for one of five reasons. The target is vague, so participants cannot tell what “closer” means. The feedback signal is missing or noisy, so the process cannot distinguish improvement from motion. The correction rule is arbitrary, so feedback does not translate into durable adjustment. The convergence path is poorly shaped, so the process oscillates, overcorrects, or narrows too early. Or the stability test is absent, so no one can tell whether the result is genuinely settled.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A process produces repeated updates, revisions, movements, negotiations, estimates, or experiments but lacks enough guidance to approach a stable result."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P019-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require an iterated or time-extended process with states capable of changing.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A process produces a sequence of state changes, updates, or movements.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require more than one movement or update, not a single unfinished transition.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Movement or change occurs repeatedly across the sequence.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require failure to settle, not merely that settling has not yet been checked.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The process does not reach a stable or settled result over the relevant sequence.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require repeated movement and non-settling to coexist over the relevant observation window.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The failure to settle persists while repeated movement continues.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "Repeated movement occurs without settling.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "an iterated process continues changing without reaching a settled state", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P019-C04-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Convergence has the opposite property: an iterated sequence approaches a stable limit.", "slug": "convergence"}], "residual_id": "r:convergence_guidance:b016_a13_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b016_a13_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Repeated movement without settling. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Repeated movement without settling"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Without the qualifier a counterexample remains; preserving both candidate and qualifier closes it because a closed non-goal screen cycle plus actual repeated traversal keeps state changing without a settled goal.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Navigation loop", "one_liner": "Diagnose a workflow where a user cannot reach their goal by modeling the interface as a directed graph and asking one structural question — is any goal state reachable from the current state? — rather than blaming screen quality or user confusion.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:navigation_loop", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2", "O4"], "guard_type": "MODALITY_ACTUALIZATION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "repeated_navigation_cycle_traversal", "predicate": "The user traverses the closed non-goal cycle through more than one complete recurrence.", "rationale": "The exact candidate spine plus the single atomic qualifier necessarily satisfies one complete DNF branch without laundering the source head."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "navigation_loop"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The user traverses the closed non-goal cycle through more than one complete recurrence."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "navigation_loop", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P019-C04-U1", "why_it_fits": "Exact-record review finds that a closed non-goal screen cycle plus actual repeated traversal keeps state changing without a settled goal."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A single principled revision would not establish repeated non-settlement, but the exact record excludes it and requires repeated revisions so no finite evidence settles the question.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Moving the goalposts", "one_liner": "An argumentative pattern in which, on being shown evidence that meets a previously stipulated standard, one party revises the standard upward to block the conclusion rather than accept it — repeated so that no finite evidence can settle the question.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:moving_the_goalposts", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "moving_the_goalposts"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "moving_the_goalposts", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P019-C04-U1", "why_it_fits": "The record directly entails an iterated sequence of revisions that continues while settlement is prevented."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Ordinary bounded iteration can settle on a stable specification, but the exact record excludes iteration and requires amendment cadence to outrun consolidation.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Requirements Churn", "one_liner": "A project pathology in which the specification changes faster than the execution organization can absorb it — a control-theoretic case where the reference signal outruns the controller's bandwidth, so no spec lives long enough for work to consolidate against it.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:requirements_churn", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "requirements_churn"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "requirements_churn", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P019-C04-U1", "why_it_fits": "Requirements churn universally entails repeated state change whose cadence prevents the process from reaching a stable specification."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Repeated movement occurs without settling.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Refinement can proceed under a clear improvement criterion and does not entail directional uncertainty.", "slug": "refinement"}], "residual_id": "r:convergence_guidance:b016_a13_c2", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b016_a13_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Unclear direction of improvement. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Unclear direction of improvement"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Refinement can proceed under a clear improvement criterion and does not entail directional uncertainty.", "slug": "refinement"}], "normalized_requirement": "The direction of improvement is unclear.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The direction of improvement is unclear.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P019-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require an iterative process with at least two distinguishable states or directions.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A process has a state, direction, or choice that can change over iterations.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require returning or reversing movement rather than monotone progress.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The process repeatedly alternates, reverses, or cycles among states or directions.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require a repeated oscillatory pattern, not one correction or reversal.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The alternation or reversal recurs.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}], "predicate": "The process oscillates.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "an iterative process repeatedly alternates or reverses among states", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P019-C05-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P019-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require an iterative process with repeated switching or rework.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A process repeatedly switches tasks, states, strategies, or resource allocations.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require excessive internal activity rather than an efficient transition.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The switching or rework consumes substantial activity relative to productive advance.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require the activity-to-progress mismatch that distinguishes thrashing from useful exploration.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The high switching activity yields little or no net progress toward the process result.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "The process thrashes.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "an iterative process expends high switching effort with little net progress", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P019-C05-U2"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A transient response can approach equilibrium monotonically without oscillation or thrashing.", "slug": "transient_response"}], "residual_id": "r:convergence_guidance:b016_a13_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b016_a13_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Oscillation or thrashing. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Oscillation or thrashing"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Without the qualifier a counterexample remains; preserving both candidate and qualifier closes it because the native closed cycle plus more than one complete traversal necessarily revisits states and recurs.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Navigation loop", "one_liner": "Diagnose a workflow where a user cannot reach their goal by modeling the interface as a directed graph and asking one structural question — is any goal state reachable from the current state? — rather than blaming screen quality or user confusion.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:navigation_loop", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2", "O3"], "guard_type": "MODALITY_ACTUALIZATION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "repeated_navigation_cycle_traversal", "predicate": "The user traverses the closed non-goal cycle through more than one complete recurrence.", "rationale": "The exact candidate spine plus the single atomic qualifier necessarily satisfies one complete DNF branch without laundering the source head."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "navigation_loop"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The user traverses the closed non-goal cycle through more than one complete recurrence."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "navigation_loop", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P019-C05-U1", "why_it_fits": "Exact-record review finds that the native closed cycle plus more than one complete traversal necessarily revisits states and recurs."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Healthy iteration permits work to consolidate, whereas the exact record requires change cadence to exceed execution bandwidth and throughput to collapse.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Requirements Churn", "one_liner": "A project pathology in which the specification changes faster than the execution organization can absorb it — a control-theoretic case where the reference signal outruns the controller's bandwidth, so no spec lives long enough for work to consolidate against it.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:requirements_churn", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "requirements_churn"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "requirements_churn", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P019-C05-U2", "why_it_fits": "Requirements churn universally entails disproportionate switching and rework with little consolidated progress."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Healthy pivots close evidence accounts before changing direction and are explicitly excluded; the exact record requires change episodes to accumulate without learning.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Pivot Thrashing", "one_liner": "Diagnose a team that changes strategic direction faster than any one direction can close an evidence account — so it piles up change episodes without accumulating learning — by comparing its adaptation cadence against the evidence horizon.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:pivot_thrashing", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "pivot_thrashing"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "pivot_thrashing", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P019-C05-U2", "why_it_fits": "Pivot thrashing directly entails repeated switching at a cadence that consumes activity while preventing evidence and learning from accumulating."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The process oscillates or thrashes.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P019-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require the target to be known before the continued diffuse exploration; fixedness without knowledge is insufficient.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A target, destination, or sought result is already known.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require ongoing exploration rather than execution focused on the known target.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The process continues exploring multiple alternatives or directions.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require broad dispersion relative to target-directed concentration.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Exploratory attention or effort remains diffuse rather than concentrating toward the target.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require the stated temporal order, not a deliberately divergent phase before target selection.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Diffuse exploration continues after the target becomes known.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "Exploration remains diffuse after the target is known.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "exploration remains diffusely allocated after its target is known", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P019-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A divergent design phase can be deliberately scheduled before a target is fixed and need not persist after it is known.", "slug": "divergence_convergence_in_the_design_process"}], "residual_id": "r:convergence_guidance:b016_a13_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b016_a13_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Diffuse exploration after the target is known. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Diffuse exploration after the target is known"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A divergent design phase can be deliberately scheduled before a target is fixed and need not persist after it is known.", "slug": "divergence_convergence_in_the_design_process"}], "normalized_requirement": "Exploration remains diffuse after the target is known.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Exploration remains diffuse after the target is known.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B5", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P019-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require plural relata whose agreement or coordination can be assessed.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Two or more actors, components, positions, or representations are candidates for alignment.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require an incomplete alignment state.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The actors, components, positions, or representations are not yet adequately aligned.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require an alignment process or trajectory, not a static difference with no convergence expectation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A process is attempting or expected to reduce the misalignment.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require stalled progress rather than slow but continuing alignment.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The alignment process has stopped making material progress over the relevant interval.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "Alignment has stalled.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "an incomplete multi-party or multi-component alignment process has stopped progressing", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P019-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Refinement can progress toward a target and does not require stalled alignment among multiple actors.", "slug": "refinement"}], "residual_id": "r:convergence_guidance:b016_a13_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b016_a13_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Stalled alignment. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Stalled alignment"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A one-sided edit auto-merges and is explicitly excluded; a complete merge-conflict instance requires two overlapping divergent edits and a halted automatic merge.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Merge Conflict", "one_liner": "Halt an automatic merge and hand the decision to a human exactly where two branches diverged from their common ancestor on the same region, because a three-way merge over text can rank a one-sided edit but has no syntactic basis to choose between two competing edits whose correctness lives in intent it cannot see.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:merge_conflict", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "merge_conflict"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "merge_conflict", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P019-C07-U1", "why_it_fits": "Merge conflict directly entails plural divergent representations and an automatic reconciliation process that stops before alignment is complete."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Alignment has stalled.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 5", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "DISJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 16, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-016", "ledger_sha256": "257cdca011003abaffda1067e296ef7c7b43b930d04bd93a5b5855e7dfcb1870"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Convex Exposure Gain Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:convex_exposure_gain_design", "slug": "convex_exposure_gain_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system faces volatility, stressors, competition, errors, load variation, or shocks, but its architecture either suppresses all variation until hidden fragility accumulates or allows disorder to strike without boundaries. As a result, disturbances create damage, churn, or mere recovery rather than durable improvement.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system faces volatility, stressors, competition, errors, load variation, or shocks, but its architecture either suppresses all variation until hidden fragility accumulates or allows disorder to strike without boundaries. As a result, disturbances create damage, churn, or mere recovery rather than durable improvement."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P019-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O4", "O5", "O6", "O7", "O8"], ["O2", "O4", "O5", "O6", "O7", "O8"], ["O3", "O4", "O5", "O6", "O7", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when stability is the overemphasized control objective.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Current controls strongly prioritize stability.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when efficiency is the overemphasized control objective.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Current controls strongly prioritize efficiency.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when protection is the overemphasized control objective.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Current controls strongly prioritize protection.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require excessive emphasis relative to preserving learning from small disturbances, without prescribing a specific suppression or neutralization mechanism.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The selected control objective is emphasized strongly enough that small disturbances fail to produce learning.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require the small-before-large sequence stated by the source.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Small disturbances occur before later large disturbances.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require loss of learning, not merely reduced damage from small disturbances.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The system no longer learns or adapts from the small disturbances.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require the controls, rather than an unrelated limitation, to suppress learning.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The strong control emphasis causes the loss of learning from small disturbances.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require later exposure to large disturbances, not only a hypothetical future shock.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "Large disturbances arrive after the period of suppressed small-disturbance learning.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "Current controls emphasize stability, efficiency, or protection so strongly that small disturbances no longer produce learning before large disturbances arrive.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "overemphasis on a control objective suppresses learning from small disturbances before large disturbances arrive", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P019-C08-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An antifragile design need not begin from an overprotected system or a history of suppressed small-disturbance learning.", "slug": "antifragility"}], "residual_id": "r:convex_exposure_gain_design:b016_a14_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b016_a14_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Current controls emphasize stability, efficiency, or protection so strongly that small disturbances no longer produce learning before large disturbances arrive. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Current controls emphasize stability, efficiency, or protection so strongly that small disturbances no longer produce learning before large disturbances arrive."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An antifragile design need not begin from an overprotected system or a history of suppressed small-disturbance learning.", "slug": "antifragility"}], "normalized_requirement": "Current controls emphasize stability, efficiency, or protection so strongly that small disturbances no longer produce learning before large disturbances arrive.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Current controls emphasize stability, efficiency, or protection so strongly that small disturbances no longer produce learning before large disturbances arrive.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires an overcompensating response that turns stress exposure into net capability or fitness gain through learning, selection, adaptation, or option payoff.", "role_mapping": "Exposure -> variability injection; listed mechanism -> convex response; system gain -> antifragile payoff.", "slug": "antifragility", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b016_a14_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The system has mechanisms for learning, selection, adaptation, repair, redesign, or option exercise after exposure. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The system has mechanisms for learning, selection, adaptation, repair, redesign, or option exercise after exposure."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Antifragility", "one_liner": "A system that gains capability from stressors and volatility, not merely withstands them.", "page_ref": "prime:antifragility", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Exposure -> variability injection; listed mechanism -> convex response; system gain -> antifragile payoff.", "slug": "antifragility", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires an overcompensating response that turns stress exposure into net capability or fitness gain through learning, selection, adaptation, or option payoff."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The system has mechanisms for learning, selection, adaptation, repair, redesign, or option exercise after exposure.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Antifragile payoff can arise in an options portfolio without durable capability improvement through any listed mechanism.", "slug": "antifragility"}], "residual_id": "r:convex_exposure_gain_design:b016_a14_c5", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b016_a14_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The desired capability can improve through practice, redundancy discovery, architecture hardening, diversification, or selective scaling of successful variants. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The desired capability can improve through practice, redundancy discovery, architecture hardening, diversification, or selective scaling of successful variants."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Antifragile payoff can arise in an options portfolio without durable capability improvement through any listed mechanism.", "slug": "antifragility"}], "normalized_requirement": "The desired capability can improve through practice, redundancy discovery, architecture hardening, diversification, or selective scaling of successful variants.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The desired capability can improve through practice, redundancy discovery, architecture hardening, diversification, or selective scaling of successful variants.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime definitionally combines bounded downside with accelerating or open-ended upside under variability.", "role_mapping": "Capped loss -> bounded downside; retained rare gains -> convex upside.", "slug": "antifragility", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b016_a14_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The downside can be capped at local, reversible, or ethically acceptable levels while the upside of rare successful adaptations can be retained. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The downside can be capped at local, reversible, or ethically acceptable levels while the upside of rare successful adaptations can be retained."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Antifragility", "one_liner": "A system that gains capability from stressors and volatility, not merely withstands them.", "page_ref": "prime:antifragility", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Capped loss -> bounded downside; retained rare gains -> convex upside.", "slug": "antifragility", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime definitionally combines bounded downside with accelerating or open-ended upside under variability."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The downside can be capped at local, reversible, or ethically acceptable levels while the upside of rare successful adaptations can be retained.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The environment contains unavoidable variability, competition, surprise, or stress that cannot be fully forecast or eliminated.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The environment contains unavoidable variability, competition, surprise, or stress that cannot be fully forecast or eliminated. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The environment contains unavoidable variability, competition, surprise, or stress that cannot be fully forecast or eliminated."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "The environment contains unavoidable variability, competition, surprise, or stress that cannot be fully forecast or eliminated."}, {"display_text": "Some local failures, challenges, or variations can be made survivable and informative if their dose, blast radius, and recovery path are governed.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: Some local failures, challenges, or variations can be made survivable and informative if their dose, blast radius, and recovery path are governed. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Some local failures, challenges, or variations can be made survivable and informative if their dose, blast radius, and recovery path are governed."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Some local failures, challenges, or variations can be made survivable and informative if their dose, blast radius, and recovery path are governed."}, {"display_text": "There is a need to distinguish true capability gain from mere survival, cosmetic resilience, or survivorship bias.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: There is a need to distinguish true capability gain from mere survival, cosmetic resilience, or survivorship bias. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["There is a need to distinguish true capability gain from mere survival, cosmetic resilience, or survivorship bias."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "There is a need to distinguish true capability gain from mere survival, cosmetic resilience, or survivorship bias."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 16, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-016", "ledger_sha256": "257cdca011003abaffda1067e296ef7c7b43b930d04bd93a5b5855e7dfcb1870"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Cooperative Communication Repair", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:cooperative_communication_repair", "slug": "cooperative_communication_repair"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 6, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 2, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 5, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 7 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 6 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 7}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is that participants rely on expectations that are usually implicit. They expect contributors to be clear enough, grounded enough, relevant enough, and informative enough for the shared purpose. When one of those expectations breaks, the exchange becomes unreliable even if everyone is nominally using the same words.\n\nA team may have plenty of information but no relevance link. A document may be truthful but unusable because it buries the answer. A support ticket may express urgency but omit reproducible details. A status update may sound reassuring but fail to say what evidence supports the reassurance. In each case, coordination breaks because the communicative structure is no longer cooperative enough for action.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Participants in an exchange cannot reliably coordinate because at least one party experiences the message as too vague, unsupported, irrelevant, misleading, incomplete, overlong, evasive, or otherwise uncooperative relative to the shared task."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P019-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require a communication event or artifact with an audience or participants; the listed settings are illustrative.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A meeting, document, support exchange, incident report, policy discussion, learning interaction, or comparable communication involves participants.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require halted or prevented progress in the exchange, not merely a harmless request for clarification.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The communication exchange stalls or ceases making progress.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require the uncertainty, rather than an unrelated condition, to be why the exchange stalls.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The selected interpretive uncertainty causes the communication exchange to stall.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by indeterminacy about communicated meaning.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Participants cannot determine what the communication means.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by uncertainty about relevance or significance.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Participants cannot determine why the communication matters.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by uncertainty about evidentiary or justificatory grounding.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "Participants cannot determine whether the communication is adequately grounded.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by uncertainty about the next action called for.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "Participants cannot determine what action to take next.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A meeting, document, support exchange, incident report, policy discussion, or learning interaction stalls because people cannot tell what is meant, why it matters, whether it is grounded, or what to do next.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "one of four interpretive uncertainties causes a communication exchange to stall", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P019-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Communication repair can address a detected local divergence without the whole exchange stalling or uncertainty about relevance, grounding, and next action.", "slug": "communication_repair"}], "residual_id": "r:cooperative_communication_repair:b016_a15_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b016_a15_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when a conversation, document, support exchange, meeting, incident update, policy memo, or learning interaction has enough shared purpose to be repaired, but the current message is blocking coordination. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A meeting, document, support exchange, incident report, policy discussion, or learning interaction stalls because people cannot tell what is meant, why it matters, whether it is grounded, or what to do next.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A meeting, document, support exchange, incident report, policy discussion, or learning interaction stalls because people cannot tell what is meant, why it matters, whether it is grounded, or what to do next.", "Use this archetype when a conversation, document, support exchange, meeting, incident update, policy memo, or learning interaction has enough shared purpose to be repaired, but the current message is blocking coordination."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Communication repair can address a detected local divergence without the whole exchange stalling or uncertainty about relevance, grounding, and next action.", "slug": "communication_repair"}], "normalized_requirement": "A meeting, document, support exchange, incident report, policy discussion, or learning interaction stalls because people cannot tell what is meant, why it matters, whether it is grounded, or what to do next.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A meeting, document, support exchange, incident report, policy discussion, or learning interaction stalls because people cannot tell what is meant, why it matters, whether it is grounded, or what to do next.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "Agents sharing state over an unreliable channel detect divergence and require a typed meta-channel act before the primary exchange can resume.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Agents sharing state over an unreliable channel detect divergence and require a typed meta-channel act before the primary exchange can resume.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P019-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require an authored message or contribution and a current communicative audience.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A speaker or writer provides information to an audience.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Preserve accuracy of the supplied content rather than treating it as false or misleading.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The information is accurate when considered in isolation.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require failure of task-relative connection despite isolated accuracy.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The information is not connected or relevant to the selected current target.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when relevance is assessed against a current decision.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The current target is a decision.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when relevance is assessed against the question being addressed.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The current target is a question.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when relevance is assessed against a current user need.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The current target is a user need.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A speaker or writer provides information that is accurate in isolation but not connected to the current decision, question, or user need.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "accurate information is disconnected from the current communicative need", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P019-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A repair can correct mishearing, reference, or state divergence even when the original content was relevant.", "slug": "communication_repair"}], "residual_id": "r:cooperative_communication_repair:b016_a15_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b016_a15_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A speaker or writer provides information that is accurate in isolation but not connected to the current decision, question, or user need. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A speaker or writer provides information that is accurate in isolation but not connected to the current decision, question, or user need."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Without the qualifier, an irrelevant conclusion may also be false. Preserving the accuracy qualifier leaves true information disconnected from the actual contested question, so the selected DNF branch is necessary.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Irrelevant conclusion", "one_liner": "Prove a sound argument for a proposition that is not the one at issue, then treat it as settling the contested claim — a relevance failure caught by restating the question before grading the answer.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:irrelevant_conclusion", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2"], "guard_type": "MODALITY_ACTUALIZATION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "accurate_substituted_proposition", "predicate": "The substituted proposition is accurate when considered in isolation.", "rationale": "The exact candidate spine plus the single atomic qualifier necessarily satisfies one complete DNF branch without laundering the source head."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "irrelevant_conclusion"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The substituted proposition is accurate when considered in isolation."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "irrelevant_conclusion", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P019-C10-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record supplies the relevance-failure spine and explicitly permits a true, well-supported substituted proposition; one atomic accuracy qualifier selects that complete case."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A speaker or writer provides information that is accurate in isolation but not connected to the current decision, question, or user need.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "Agents sharing state over an unreliable channel detect divergence and require a typed meta-channel act before the primary exchange can resume.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Agents sharing state over an unreliable channel detect divergence and require a typed meta-channel act before the primary exchange can resume.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P019-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require communicated content that participants are expected to evaluate or use; the listed content types are illustrative.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A claim, number, recommendation, accusation, or comparable assertion is communicated to participants.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require a support shortfall relative to participant evaluation or action.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The communicated content lacks enough evidentiary or justificatory basis.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require the support shortfall, rather than an unrelated limitation, to be why participants cannot evaluate or act.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The inadequate basis causes the selected participant-use failure.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by inability to assess warrant, credibility, or merits, not mere disagreement.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Participants cannot adequately evaluate the communicated content on the basis provided.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by actionability failure, not merely difficulty judging truth.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Participants cannot responsibly act on the communicated content on the basis provided.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Claims, numbers, recommendations, or accusations are made without enough basis for participants to evaluate or act on them.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "insufficiently supported communicated content prevents either evaluation or action", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P019-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Repair can restore shared state without any unsupported claim, number, accusation, or recommendation.", "slug": "communication_repair"}], "residual_id": "r:cooperative_communication_repair:b016_a15_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b016_a15_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Claims, numbers, recommendations, or accusations are made without enough basis for participants to evaluate or act on them. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Claims, numbers, recommendations, or accusations are made without enough basis for participants to evaluate or act on them."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "I attempted a complete Guilt by Association instance that falsifies the retained branch, but the exact record excludes it because an association is communicated as a verdict without the causal or evidential link needed to evaluate the target.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Guilt by Association", "one_liner": "Discredit a claim by the disreputable company it keeps — treating shared supporters, origins, or venues as a verdict on content — a relevance failure that lets no truth-value flow along co-occurrence edges without an independent causal or evidential link.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:guilt_by_association", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "guilt_by_association"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "guilt_by_association", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P019-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "Exact-record review finds that an association is communicated as a verdict without the causal or evidential link needed to evaluate the target."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "I attempted a complete Complex Question instance that falsifies the retained branch, but the exact record excludes it because an unestablished assertion is embedded as presupposition and every direct response would irresponsibly ratify it.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Complex Question", "one_liner": "Expose a question that smuggles a contested claim in as its presupposition, so every direct answer silently ratifies the claim and the only sound reply is to refuse the frame.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:complex_question", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "complex_question"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "complex_question", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P019-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "Exact-record review finds that an unestablished assertion is embedded as presupposition and every direct response would irresponsibly ratify it."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "I attempted a complete Slippery Slope instance that falsifies the retained branch, but the exact record excludes it because an unsupported consequence chain is communicated as the basis for rejecting a proposal and cannot responsibly license that action.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Slippery Slope", "one_liner": "Flag a consequence-chain argument as fallacious when its inter-step links are held together only by conceivability rather than a demonstrated mechanism, so it blocks a proposal by gesturing at a speculative terminus.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:slippery_slope", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "slippery_slope"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "slippery_slope", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P019-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "Exact-record review finds that an unsupported consequence chain is communicated as the basis for rejecting a proposal and cannot responsibly license that action."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Claims, numbers, recommendations, or accusations are made without enough basis for participants to evaluate or act on them.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "Agents sharing state over an unreliable channel detect divergence and require a typed meta-channel act before the primary exchange can resume.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Agents sharing state over an unreliable channel detect divergence and require a typed meta-channel act before the primary exchange can resume.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P019-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require a message, an audience, and a use situation against which detail fit can be assessed.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A message is delivered to an audience in a particular situation.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require more than one clarification request or a recurring follow-up pattern.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The audience asks follow-up questions repeatedly.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require the selected detail mismatch to generate the follow-up pattern.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A mismatch between message detail and the situation causes the repeated questions.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by insufficient detail.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The message provides too little detail for the situation.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by excessive detail.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The message provides too much detail for the situation.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by detail that is mismatched in kind or relevance.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The message provides the wrong detail for the situation.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "The audience asks repeated follow-up questions because a message gives too little detail, too much detail, or the wrong detail for the situation.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "situational detail mismatch in a message causes repeated clarification requests", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P019-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A single repair initiation can resolve divergence and need not be caused by information quantity mismatch or repeated questions.", "slug": "communication_repair"}], "residual_id": "r:cooperative_communication_repair:b016_a15_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b016_a15_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when people are asking questions such as “what do you mean?”, “why does this matter?”, “what supports that?”, “what should I do next?”, or “can you give me the right level of detail?” The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The audience asks repeated follow-up questions because a message gives too little detail, too much detail, or the wrong detail for the situation.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The audience asks repeated follow-up questions because a message gives too little detail, too much detail, or the wrong detail for the situation.", "It is especially useful when people are asking questions such as “what do you mean?”, “why does this matter?”, “what supports that?”, “what should I do next?”, or “can you give me the right level of detail?”"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A single repair initiation can resolve divergence and need not be caused by information quantity mismatch or repeated questions.", "slug": "communication_repair"}], "normalized_requirement": "The audience asks repeated follow-up questions because a message gives too little detail, too much detail, or the wrong detail for the situation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The audience asks repeated follow-up questions because a message gives too little detail, too much detail, or the wrong detail for the situation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "Agents sharing state over an unreliable channel detect divergence and require a typed meta-channel act before the primary exchange can resume.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Agents sharing state over an unreliable channel detect divergence and require a typed meta-channel act before the primary exchange can resume.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B5", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P019-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require a communicator and at least one participant who can attribute a disposition to the communicator.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A speaker participates in an exchange with one or more other participants.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require an emerging participant-to-speaker attribution expressed in treatment or stance.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Participants begin treating the speaker according to the selected negative attribution.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Preserve the possibility that the negative attribution does not reflect the speaker’s actual intent.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The speaker’s underlying intent may nevertheless be cooperative.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by an attribution of evasiveness.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Participants treat the speaker as evasive.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by an attribution of carelessness.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Participants treat the speaker as careless.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by an attribution of manipulation.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "Participants treat the speaker as manipulative.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by an attribution of irrelevance.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "Participants treat the speaker as irrelevant.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Participants begin treating the speaker as evasive, careless, manipulative, or irrelevant even when the underlying intent may be cooperative.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "participants adopt a negative speaker attribution even though cooperative intent remains possible", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P019-C13-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Shared-state divergence does not require a negative character attribution toward the speaker.", "slug": "communication_repair"}], "residual_id": "r:cooperative_communication_repair:b016_a15_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b016_a15_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Participants in an exchange cannot reliably coordinate because at least one party experiences the message as too vague, unsupported, irrelevant, misleading, incomplete, overlong, evasive, or otherwise uncooperative relative to the shared task. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Participants begin treating the speaker as evasive, careless, manipulative, or irrelevant even when the underlying intent may be cooperative.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Participants begin treating the speaker as evasive, careless, manipulative, or irrelevant even when the underlying intent may be cooperative.", "Participants in an exchange cannot reliably coordinate because at least one party experiences the message as too vague, unsupported, irrelevant, misleading, incomplete, overlong, evasive, or otherwise uncooperative relative to the shared task."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Shared-state divergence does not require a negative character attribution toward the speaker.", "slug": "communication_repair"}], "normalized_requirement": "Participants begin treating the speaker as evasive, careless, manipulative, or irrelevant even when the underlying intent may be cooperative.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Participants begin treating the speaker as evasive, careless, manipulative, or irrelevant even when the underlying intent may be cooperative.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "Agents sharing state over an unreliable channel detect divergence and require a typed meta-channel act before the primary exchange can resume.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Agents sharing state over an unreliable channel detect divergence and require a typed meta-channel act before the primary exchange can resume.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 5", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B6", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P019-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require an established, repeatedly applicable communication norm rather than an isolated preference.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A recurring norm governs communication among participants.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Preserve the conditional violation setting without requiring that every invocation contains an actual violation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The communication norm can be or is violated in an exchange.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require absence of a repair mechanism, not merely failure to use one that exists.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "No repair path is available to restore coordination after a violation.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Bind the missing repair path to the post-violation state.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The absence of repair applies after or in response to violation of the norm.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "A recurring communication norm exists but has no repair path when it is violated.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "a recurring communication norm lacks a post-violation repair path", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P019-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime describes an available repair mechanism and therefore has the opposite state from a norm with no repair path.", "slug": "communication_repair"}], "residual_id": "r:cooperative_communication_repair:b016_a15_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b016_a15_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Those neighboring archetypes may be used alongside it, but Cooperative Communication Repair remains focused on restoring cooperative expectations inside an exchange. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A recurring communication norm exists but has no repair path when it is violated.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A recurring communication norm exists but has no repair path when it is violated.", "Those neighboring archetypes may be used alongside it, but Cooperative Communication Repair remains focused on restoring cooperative expectations inside an exchange."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime describes an available repair mechanism and therefore has the opposite state from a norm with no repair path.", "slug": "communication_repair"}], "normalized_requirement": "A recurring communication norm exists but has no repair path when it is violated.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A recurring communication norm exists but has no repair path when it is violated.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "Agents sharing state over an unreliable channel detect divergence and require a typed meta-channel act before the primary exchange can resume.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Agents sharing state over an unreliable channel detect divergence and require a typed meta-channel act before the primary exchange can resume.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 6", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "DISJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 16, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-016", "ledger_sha256": "257cdca011003abaffda1067e296ef7c7b43b930d04bd93a5b5855e7dfcb1870"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Coordination and Synchronization Across Reentry Phases", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:coordination_and_synchronization_across_reentry_phases", "slug": "coordination_and_synchronization_across_reentry_phases"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is that local readiness and global readiness diverge after isolation. Each unit may know its own staff, equipment, inventory, code, habitat, or service state, but the system also needs compatible timing, shared capacity, downstream absorption, and safe reactivation of interfaces.\n\nUncoordinated reentry commonly produces several recognizable symptoms: a downstream team waits on an upstream service that has not returned; several units overload the same support group; a dashboard says all units are green while system flow remains red; one actor reopens under rules that others cannot yet support; or the system repeatedly reopens and recloses because failure signals appear too late.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system must resume interaction after suspension or isolation, but its parts are not equally ready, do not depend on one another symmetrically, and may overload shared resources if they restart independently. Uncoordinated reentry turns local readiness into global instability: bottlenecks, idle dependencies, inconsistent rules, duplicated work, safety failures, and repeated pauses."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a prior suspended, quarantined, or degraded state from which normal operation is restored.", "role_mapping": "Listed unit -> suspended system; isolated/paused state -> pre-reentry state.", "slug": "controlled_reentry", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b017_a01_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use it when several subsystems, actors, cohorts, functions, flows, or habitats are returning from suspension, isolation, quarantine, outage, emergency mode, or protective separation. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Several actors, sites, services, cohorts, species, teams, or process stages have been isolated, paused, degraded, or held in reduced mode.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Several actors, sites, services, cohorts, species, teams, or process stages have been isolated, paused, degraded, or held in reduced mode.", "Use it when several subsystems, actors, cohorts, functions, flows, or habitats are returning from suspension, isolation, quarantine, outage, emergency mode, or protective separation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Controlled Reentry", "one_liner": "Re-establishing a suspended activity or state through staged, monitored steps with the capacity to abort, because returning to normal is a separate engineered process and not a simple reversal of the exit.", "page_ref": "prime:controlled_reentry", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Listed unit -> suspended system; isolated/paused state -> pre-reentry state.", "slug": "controlled_reentry", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a prior suspended, quarantined, or degraded state from which normal operation is restored."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Several actors, sites, services, cohorts, species, teams, or process stages have been isolated, paused, degraded, or held in reduced mode.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P019-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require a multi-unit reentry setting, not a solitary component with no interdependence.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A system contains multiple units whose return or reentry must be assessed.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Preserve “some local readiness” and do not upgrade it to complete self-certification.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Each returning unit can evaluate at least some aspect of its own local readiness.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Require a necessary reentry dependency beyond the unit’s local assessment.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Safe return is not determined by local readiness alone and depends on the selected nonlocal condition.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by cross-unit state dependence.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Safe return depends on the readiness or state of other units.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by a shared-resource dependency.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Safe return depends on availability or capacity of shared resources.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by downstream absorption dependence.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "Safe return depends on downstream capacity to absorb the returning unit.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by an interface-compatibility dependency.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "Safe return depends on compatibility at an interface.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Each unit can evaluate some local readiness, but safe return depends on other units, shared resources, downstream absorption, or interface compatibility.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "local reentry-readiness assessment is insufficient because safe return depends on a condition outside the returning unit’s local state", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P019-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Controlled reentry can stage one unit whose safety does not depend on other units or a shared resource.", "slug": "controlled_reentry"}], "residual_id": "r:coordination_and_synchronization_across_reentry_phases:b017_a01_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b017_a01_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Each unit may know its own staff, equipment, inventory, code, habitat, or service state, but the system also needs compatible timing, shared capacity, downstream absorption, and safe reactivation of interfaces. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Each unit can evaluate some local readiness, but safe return depends on other units, shared resources, downstream absorption, or interface compatibility.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Each unit can evaluate some local readiness, but safe return depends on other units, shared resources, downstream absorption, or interface compatibility.", "Each unit may know its own staff, equipment, inventory, code, habitat, or service state, but the system also needs compatible timing, shared capacity, downstream absorption, and safe reactivation of interfaces."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Controlled reentry can stage one unit whose safety does not depend on other units or a shared resource.", "slug": "controlled_reentry"}], "normalized_requirement": "Each unit can evaluate some local readiness, but safe return depends on other units, shared resources, downstream absorption, or interface compatibility.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Each unit can evaluate some local readiness, but safe return depends on other units, shared resources, downstream absorption, or interface compatibility.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P020-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must contain a unit reentering a system or interaction, not merely changing state without reentry.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A unit undertakes reentry into interaction or operation.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require reentry before the relevant readiness or coordination condition is met.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The unit's reentry is premature.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve possible causation from the premature reentry to the branch outcome, not mere coexistence.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The premature reentry can cause the selected consequence.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only when a distinct coupled unit can be harmed by the premature reentry.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A complete consequence branch is harm to another unit.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only when the premature reentry can exhaust a resource buffer shared across units.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "A complete consequence branch is exhaustion of a shared buffer.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only when the premature reentry can force rollback beyond the reentering unit.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "A complete consequence branch is a wider rollback.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Premature reentry by one unit can harm another unit, exhaust a shared buffer, or force a wider rollback.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "premature unit reentry can cause a specified coupled-system consequence", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P020-C01-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime requires vulnerable reentry but not cross-unit harm, shared-buffer exhaustion, or wider rollback.", "slug": "controlled_reentry"}], "residual_id": "r:coordination_and_synchronization_across_reentry_phases:b017_a01_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b017_a01_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system must resume interaction after suspension or isolation, but its parts are not equally ready, do not depend on one another symmetrically, and may overload shared resources if they restart independently. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Premature reentry by one unit can harm another unit, exhaust a shared buffer, or force a wider rollback.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Premature reentry by one unit can harm another unit, exhaust a shared buffer, or force a wider rollback.", "A system must resume interaction after suspension or isolation, but its parts are not equally ready, do not depend on one another symmetrically, and may overload shared resources if they restart independently."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime requires vulnerable reentry but not cross-unit harm, shared-buffer exhaustion, or wider rollback.", "slug": "controlled_reentry"}], "normalized_requirement": "Premature reentry by one unit can harm another unit, exhaust a shared buffer, or force a wider rollback.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Premature reentry by one unit can harm another unit, exhaust a shared buffer, or force a wider rollback.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime rejects flip-switch restoration because return is a vulnerable, risk-bearing transition requiring staged checkpoints and abort capacity.", "role_mapping": "Full return -> one-step resumption; unacceptable risk -> vulnerable transition.", "slug": "controlled_reentry", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b017_a01_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The system needs timely return to interaction, but interaction itself is what recreates risk. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Full return cannot be tested all at once without unacceptable safety, reliability, ecological, financial, or social risk.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Full return cannot be tested all at once without unacceptable safety, reliability, ecological, financial, or social risk.", "The system needs timely return to interaction, but interaction itself is what recreates risk."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Controlled Reentry", "one_liner": "Re-establishing a suspended activity or state through staged, monitored steps with the capacity to abort, because returning to normal is a separate engineered process and not a simple reversal of the exit.", "page_ref": "prime:controlled_reentry", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Full return -> one-step resumption; unacceptable risk -> vulnerable transition.", "slug": "controlled_reentry", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime rejects flip-switch restoration because return is a vulnerable, risk-bearing transition requiring staged checkpoints and abort capacity."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Full return cannot be tested all at once without unacceptable safety, reliability, ecological, financial, or social risk.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The system has accumulated backlog, deferred maintenance, latent demand, or unprocessed information during isolation.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when dependencies are uneven, shared resources are scarce, backlog has accumulated, or premature full return would produce bottlenecks or cascading failure. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The system has accumulated backlog, deferred maintenance, latent demand, or unprocessed information during isolation. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The system has accumulated backlog, deferred maintenance, latent demand, or unprocessed information during isolation.", "It is especially useful when dependencies are uneven, shared resources are scarce, backlog has accumulated, or premature full return would produce bottlenecks or cascading failure."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "The system has accumulated backlog, deferred maintenance, latent demand, or unprocessed information during isolation."}, {"display_text": "Different units face different recovery rates, clocks, constraints, or incentives.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Different units face different recovery rates, clocks, constraints, or incentives. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Different units face different recovery rates, clocks, constraints, or incentives."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Different units face different recovery rates, clocks, constraints, or incentives."}, {"display_text": "Stakeholders need to know which phase the system is in, what must happen next, and when a hold or resuspension is required.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Stakeholders need to know which phase the system is in, what must happen next, and when a hold or resuspension is required. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders need to know which phase the system is in, what must happen next, and when a hold or resuspension is required."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "Stakeholders need to know which phase the system is in, what must happen next, and when a hold or resuspension is required."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 17, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-017", "ledger_sha256": "d63c7328913dbd0a29141fbb2c4088d0f5adc6bb0345e98cc3deef36881dd7de"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Coordination Equilibrium Shift", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:coordination_equilibrium_shift", "slug": "coordination_equilibrium_shift"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 3, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 7, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 7 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 3 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 7}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "In a coordination problem, preference and expectation separate. An actor may prefer everyone to use a new protocol but retain the legacy one because counterparts remain there. A worker may prefer a safer reporting norm but stay silent because colleagues are expected to stay silent. A supplier may invest in a new standard only if manufacturers and buyers commit. Each actor’s local caution reproduces the collective condition that makes caution rational.\n\nSeveral structural barriers recur:\n\n- **Plural stable outcomes.** More than one convention works, but using different ones destroys compatibility or value.\n- **Private agreement without common knowledge.** Actors know their own preference but cannot safely infer others’ intentions or knowledge.\n- **Cheap talk.** Public support carries no cost, verification, or consequence, so promises do not change best responses.\n- **Early-mover exposure.** First movers pay switching, learning, compatibility, reputation, or safety costs before benefits arrive.\n- **Missing complements.** Total adoption can look high while a crucial role, geography, platform side, or capability remains absent.\n- **Unsafe intermediate states.** Old and new arrangements cannot coexist cleanly, or partial migration creates greater risk than either endpoint.\n- **Conflicting focal signals.** Different leaders, defaults, dates, standards, or precedents split expectations instead of unifying them.\n- **Illegitimate selection.** A sponsor treats its preference as collective value, suppresses dissent, or shifts costs to actors without standing.\n- **Support dependence.** Subsidy, attention, or emergency authority creates adoption that collapses when extraordinary support ends.\n- **Lock-in.** Once coordination succeeds, switching cost and enforcement protect the convention after its value or legitimacy decays.\n\nThese failures cannot be solved by communication alone. More messaging may increase awareness without creating reciprocal assurance. A default may coordinate behavior but conceal coercion. Subsidies may buy temporary participation without producing a viable equilibrium. A standard may specify a target but not establish why actors will select it. The structural intervention must connect expectations, commitments, payoffs, threshold composition, transition states, legitimacy, and revision.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Several stable outcomes are possible, but actors cannot coordinate on one because expectations diverge, signals conflict, commitments are cheap talk, early movers face disproportionate loss, complementary roles are missing, or the transition contains unsafe intermediate states. The current equilibrium may be inferior yet individually rational to preserve. A sponsor may also label an outcome “better” without legitimate authority or fair distribution. Ordinary communication, incentive changes, standards, or threshold building each solve only part of the problem."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P020-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must necessarily contain multiple actors whose choices can depend on one another.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Two or more actors are involved.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require a common privately preferred outcome, not merely compatible or different preferences.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The actors privately prefer the same outcome.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail actual withholding or delay of movement, not only a possible future hesitation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The actors are waiting rather than moving toward that outcome.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must make assurance about others' movement the reason for waiting, not an unrelated delay.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "They wait because they lack assurance that the other actors will move.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Actors privately prefer the same outcome but wait for assurance that others will move.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "actors sharing a private preference wait for mutual movement assurance", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P020-C02-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Complementary payoffs need not involve a privately shared preferred outcome or actors waiting for assurance.", "slug": "strategic_complementarity"}], "residual_id": "r:coordination_equilibrium_shift:b017_a02_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b017_a02_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A standard may specify a target but not establish why actors will select it. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Actors privately prefer the same outcome but wait for assurance that others will move.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["actors privately prefer the same outcome but wait for assurance that others will move", "A standard may specify a target but not establish why actors will select it."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Complementary payoffs need not involve a privately shared preferred outcome or actors waiting for assurance.", "slug": "strategic_complementarity"}], "normalized_requirement": "Actors privately prefer the same outcome but wait for assurance that others will move.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Actors privately prefer the same outcome but wait for assurance that others will move.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Switching cost applies to any stateful mode transition and does not require multiple actors or unilateral equilibrium movement.", "slug": "switching_cost"}], "residual_id": "r:coordination_equilibrium_shift:b017_a02_c3", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b017_a02_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Unilateral switching is costly or unsafe. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["unilateral switching is costly or unsafe"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Switching cost applies to any stateful mode transition and does not require multiple actors or unilateral equilibrium movement.", "slug": "switching_cost"}], "normalized_requirement": "Unilateral switching is costly or unsafe.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Unilateral switching is costly or unsafe.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Path dependence can persist through increasing returns or historical sequence without actors' expectations plus switching costs.", "slug": "path_dependence"}], "residual_id": "r:coordination_equilibrium_shift:b017_a02_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b017_a02_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "**Early-mover exposure.* First movers pay switching, learning, compatibility, reputation, or safety costs before benefits arrive. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A legacy equilibrium persists through expectations and switching costs.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["a legacy equilibrium persists through expectations and switching costs", "**Early-mover exposure.* First movers pay switching, learning, compatibility, reputation, or safety costs before benefits arrive."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Path dependence can persist through increasing returns or historical sequence without actors' expectations plus switching costs.", "slug": "path_dependence"}], "normalized_requirement": "A legacy equilibrium persists through expectations and switching costs.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A legacy equilibrium persists through expectations and switching costs.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P020-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must necessarily involve at least two distinct conventions.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Two or more conventions are present.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must type the alternatives as conventions or shared coordination rules, not arbitrary options.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The compared alternatives are conventions.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require the competing conventions to be viable individually, not include a plainly nonfunctional option.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Each convention is workable on its own.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail that the conventions cannot be jointly followed or composed as stated.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The workable conventions are mutually incompatible.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Two or more conventions are workable but incompatible.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "multiple workable conventions are mutually incompatible", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P020-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Coordination can align actions under one uncontested convention and does not require multiple workable equilibria.", "slug": "coordination"}], "residual_id": "r:coordination_equilibrium_shift:b017_a02_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b017_a02_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Typical signals include incompatible standards that are each workable, organizations waiting for one another to adopt a shared practice, complementary platform sides stuck in a cold start, communities privately opposing a norm but expecting others to comply, infrastructure participants unable to migrate safely at different times, or public actors needing one common emergency convention. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Two or more conventions are workable but incompatible.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["two or more conventions are workable but incompatible", "Typical signals include incompatible standards that are each workable, organizations waiting for one another to adopt a shared practice, complementary platform sides stuck in a cold start, communities privately opposing a norm but expecting others to comply, infrastructure participants unable to migrate safely at different times, or public actors needing one common emergency convention."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Coordination can align actions under one uncontested convention and does not require multiple workable equilibria.", "slug": "coordination"}], "normalized_requirement": "Two or more conventions are workable but incompatible.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Two or more conventions are workable but incompatible.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Coordinated actors may perform identical synchronized roles and need not be functionally complementary.", "slug": "coordination"}], "residual_id": "r:coordination_equilibrium_shift:b017_a02_c5", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b017_a02_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Several stable outcomes are possible, but actors cannot coordinate on one because expectations diverge, signals conflict, commitments are cheap talk, early movers face disproportionate loss, complementary roles are missing, or the transition contains unsafe intermediate states. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Coordination requires complementary roles rather than headcount alone.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["coordination requires complementary roles rather than headcount alone", "Several stable outcomes are possible, but actors cannot coordinate on one because expectations diverge, signals conflict, commitments are cheap talk, early movers face disproportionate loss, complementary roles are missing, or the transition contains unsafe intermediate states."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Coordinated actors may perform identical synchronized roles and need not be functionally complementary.", "slug": "coordination"}], "normalized_requirement": "Coordination requires complementary roles rather than headcount alone.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Coordination requires complementary roles rather than headcount alone.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P020-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only when at least one announcement participates in the conflicting signal set.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A complete source branch includes conflicting announcements.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only when at least one default participates in the conflicting signal set.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A complete source branch includes conflicting defaults.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require a conflict among signals, not merely the presence of several consistent announcements or defaults.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Two or more coordination signals conflict.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail focal-point multiplicity rather than uncertainty around one focal point.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Two or more focal points result.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the causal direction from signal conflict to focal-point proliferation.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The conflicting signals create the multiple focal points.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Conflicting announcements or defaults create multiple focal points.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "conflicting coordination signals create multiple focal points", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P020-C04-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Coordination can operate with one focal signal and does not require conflicting announcements.", "slug": "coordination"}], "residual_id": "r:coordination_equilibrium_shift:b017_a02_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b017_a02_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "**Conflicting focal signals.* Different leaders, defaults, dates, standards, or precedents split expectations instead of unifying them. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Conflicting announcements or defaults create multiple focal points.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["conflicting announcements or defaults create multiple focal points", "**Conflicting focal signals.* Different leaders, defaults, dates, standards, or precedents split expectations instead of unifying them."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Coordination can operate with one focal signal and does not require conflicting announcements.", "slug": "coordination"}], "normalized_requirement": "Conflicting announcements or defaults create multiple focal points.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Conflicting announcements or defaults create multiple focal points.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P020-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must contain a convention whose establishment precedes the change in conditions.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A convention was established before the relevant conditions changed.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail an actual change in conditions, not only the possibility of future change.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The relevant conditions have changed.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve continued use or dominance of the same convention after the change.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The established convention persists despite the changed conditions.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require persistence through a lock-in mechanism rather than a freely renewed choice on current merits.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Lock-in constrains departure from the established convention.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "An established convention is locked in despite changed conditions.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "an established convention remains locked in after conditions change", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P020-C05-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An equilibrium can adapt to current conditions and need not be a legacy convention under lock-in.", "slug": "equilibrium"}], "residual_id": "r:coordination_equilibrium_shift:b017_a02_c9", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b017_a02_c9", "explanation": {"paragraph": "**Lock-in.* Once coordination succeeds, switching cost and enforcement protect the convention after its value or legitimacy decays. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: An established convention is locked in despite changed conditions.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [9], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["an established convention is locked in despite changed conditions", "**Lock-in.* Once coordination succeeds, switching cost and enforcement protect the convention after its value or legitimacy decays."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An equilibrium can adapt to current conditions and need not be a legacy convention under lock-in.", "slug": "equilibrium"}], "normalized_requirement": "An established convention is locked in despite changed conditions.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "An established convention is locked in despite changed conditions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [9], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "a better equilibrium needs temporary bridge support.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Subsidies may buy temporary participation without producing a viable equilibrium. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: a better equilibrium needs temporary bridge support. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["a better equilibrium needs temporary bridge support", "Subsidies may buy temporary participation without producing a viable equilibrium."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "a better equilibrium needs temporary bridge support"}, {"display_text": "a transition can strand late or resource-poor actors.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Can transition and rollback be designed without stranding participants or destroying necessary service? In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: a transition can strand late or resource-poor actors. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["a transition can strand late or resource-poor actors", "Can transition and rollback be designed without stranding participants or destroying necessary service?"]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 8, "text": "a transition can strand late or resource-poor actors"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 17, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-017", "ledger_sha256": "d63c7328913dbd0a29141fbb2c4088d0f5adc6bb0345e98cc3deef36881dd7de"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Coordination Scaffold Load Control", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:coordination_scaffold_load_control", "slug": "coordination_scaffold_load_control"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 7 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 7}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "An organization or multi-actor system adds support structures to improve alignment, oversight, communication, compliance, or delivery. Each support structure generates additional meetings, reports, approvals, exception paths, dashboards, queues, roles, and cross-team handoffs. Eventually the support layer competes with or exceeds the capacity of the primary activity, so actors spend more effort proving, aligning, coordinating, or escalating work than doing or improving the work.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "An organization or multi-actor system adds support structures to improve alignment, oversight, communication, compliance, or delivery. Each support structure generates additional meetings, reports, approvals, exception paths, dashboards, queues, roles, and cross-team handoffs. Eventually the support layer competes with or exceeds the capacity of the primary activity, so actors spend more effort proving, aligning, coordinating, or escalating work than doing or improving the work."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a coordination or governance scaffold around a primary activity, implying cross-role work to align.", "role_mapping": "Activity -> primary work; cross-boundary coordination -> scaffold demand.", "slug": "coordination_overhead_inversion", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b017_a03_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The activity requires coordination across teams, levels, roles, jurisdictions, systems, or time zones. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The activity requires coordination across teams, levels, roles, jurisdictions, systems, or time zones."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Coordination-Overhead Inversion", "one_liner": "A support scaffold recursively reproduces its own coordination demand until the supporting layer consumes more capacity than the activity it was meant to support.", "page_ref": "prime:coordination_overhead_inversion", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Activity -> primary work; cross-boundary coordination -> scaffold demand.", "slug": "coordination_overhead_inversion", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a coordination or governance scaffold around a primary activity, implying cross-role work to align."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The activity requires coordination across teams, levels, roles, jurisdictions, systems, or time zones.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a scaffold layer introduced to support primary work through coordination, oversight, documentation, or governance.", "role_mapping": "Support layer -> scaffold; listed problem -> local justification.", "slug": "coordination_overhead_inversion", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b017_a03_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "An organization or multi-actor system adds support structures to improve alignment, oversight, communication, compliance, or delivery. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A support layer has been introduced to solve coordination, oversight, compliance, risk, quality, or communication problems.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A support layer has been introduced to solve coordination, oversight, compliance, risk, quality, or communication problems.", "An organization or multi-actor system adds support structures to improve alignment, oversight, communication, compliance, or delivery."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Coordination-Overhead Inversion", "one_liner": "A support scaffold recursively reproduces its own coordination demand until the supporting layer consumes more capacity than the activity it was meant to support.", "page_ref": "prime:coordination_overhead_inversion", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Support layer -> scaffold; listed problem -> local justification.", "slug": "coordination_overhead_inversion", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a scaffold layer introduced to support primary work through coordination, oversight, documentation, or governance."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A support layer has been introduced to solve coordination, oversight, compliance, risk, quality, or communication problems.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's load-bearing recursion has scaffold generate governance-of-governance and meetings-about-meetings.", "role_mapping": "New support artifacts -> meta-scaffold; their coordination -> recursive reproduction.", "slug": "coordination_overhead_inversion", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b017_a03_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Each support structure generates additional meetings, reports, approvals, exception paths, dashboards, queues, roles, and cross-team handoffs. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The support layer creates new actors, artifacts, approvals, meetings, metrics, or handoffs that themselves require coordination.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The support layer creates new actors, artifacts, approvals, meetings, metrics, or handoffs that themselves require coordination.", "Each support structure generates additional meetings, reports, approvals, exception paths, dashboards, queues, roles, and cross-team handoffs."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Coordination-Overhead Inversion", "one_liner": "A support scaffold recursively reproduces its own coordination demand until the supporting layer consumes more capacity than the activity it was meant to support.", "page_ref": "prime:coordination_overhead_inversion", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "New support artifacts -> meta-scaffold; their coordination -> recursive reproduction.", "slug": "coordination_overhead_inversion", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's load-bearing recursion has scaffold generate governance-of-governance and meetings-about-meetings."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The support layer creates new actors, artifacts, approvals, meetings, metrics, or handoffs that themselves require coordination.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Recursive scaffold growth can be maintained by dedicated support actors while primary workers remain insulated from parallel status systems.", "slug": "coordination_overhead_inversion"}], "residual_id": "r:coordination_scaffold_load_control:b017_a03_c4", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b017_a03_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Primary workers must maintain multiple parallel systems of status, justification, or alignment. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Primary workers must maintain multiple parallel systems of status, justification, or alignment."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Recursive scaffold growth can be maintained by dedicated support actors while primary workers remain insulated from parallel status systems.", "slug": "coordination_overhead_inversion"}], "normalized_requirement": "Primary workers must maintain multiple parallel systems of status, justification, or alignment.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Primary workers must maintain multiple parallel systems of status, justification, or alignment.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires local scaffold benefit and cost to be visible while aggregate scaffold cost remains hidden.", "role_mapping": "Visible noncoordination loss -> local justification; unbudgeted coordination -> aggregate blindness.", "slug": "coordination_overhead_inversion", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b017_a03_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The cost of not coordinating is visible, but the cost of coordination itself is not budgeted. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The cost of not coordinating is visible, but the cost of coordination itself is not budgeted."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Coordination-Overhead Inversion", "one_liner": "A support scaffold recursively reproduces its own coordination demand until the supporting layer consumes more capacity than the activity it was meant to support.", "page_ref": "prime:coordination_overhead_inversion", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Visible noncoordination loss -> local justification; unbudgeted coordination -> aggregate blindness.", "slug": "coordination_overhead_inversion", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires local scaffold benefit and cost to be visible while aggregate scaffold cost remains hidden."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The cost of not coordinating is visible, but the cost of coordination itself is not budgeted.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P020-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must contain newly encountered or newly recognized exceptions as the response trigger.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "One or more new exceptions require handling.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must contain an inherited process structure to which another process can be added.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "An existing set of older processes is already in place.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must make process addition the response to the exceptions, not unrelated contemporaneous growth.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Handling the new exceptions causes another process to be added.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve both non-removal and non-simplification of the existing process stack.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The older processes are neither removed nor simplified as part of the response.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "New exceptions are handled by adding another process rather than removing or simplifying old ones.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "new exceptions add processes while old processes remain unsimplified", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P020-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Intervention stacks can accrete for new goals rather than exceptions and need not reject simplification explicitly.", "slug": "intervention_stack_accretion"}], "residual_id": "r:coordination_scaffold_load_control:b017_a03_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b017_a03_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: New exceptions are handled by adding another process rather than removing or simplifying old ones. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["New exceptions are handled by adding another process rather than removing or simplifying old ones."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Intervention stacks can accrete for new goals rather than exceptions and need not reject simplification explicitly.", "slug": "intervention_stack_accretion"}], "normalized_requirement": "New exceptions are handled by adding another process rather than removing or simplifying old ones.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "New exceptions are handled by adding another process rather than removing or simplifying old ones.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P020-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern rights or authority to decide, not generic task or communication ambiguity.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Decision rights allocate authority over decisions.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail continuing ambiguity in the authority allocation, not a past ambiguity already resolved.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The decision rights remain ambiguous.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require growth in the number or branching of escalation paths.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Escalation paths multiply.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve causal direction from authority ambiguity to proliferating escalation.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The ambiguous decision rights cause escalation-path multiplication.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail that escalation growth leaves the underlying authority boundary unresolved.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The multiplied paths do not resolve the authority boundaries.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Decision rights remain ambiguous, causing escalation paths to multiply instead of resolving authority boundaries.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "ambiguous decision rights multiply escalation paths without resolving authority", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P020-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Recursive coordination overhead can grow despite clear decision rights and need not involve multiplied escalation paths.", "slug": "coordination_overhead_inversion"}], "residual_id": "r:coordination_scaffold_load_control:b017_a03_c7", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b017_a03_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Decision rights remain ambiguous, causing escalation paths to multiply instead of resolving authority boundaries. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Decision rights remain ambiguous, causing escalation paths to multiply instead of resolving authority boundaries."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Recursive coordination overhead can grow despite clear decision rights and need not involve multiplied escalation paths.", "slug": "coordination_overhead_inversion"}], "normalized_requirement": "Decision rights remain ambiguous, causing escalation paths to multiply instead of resolving authority boundaries.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Decision rights remain ambiguous, causing escalation paths to multiply instead of resolving authority boundaries.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 17, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-017", "ledger_sha256": "d63c7328913dbd0a29141fbb2c4088d0f5adc6bb0345e98cc3deef36881dd7de"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Core Model First", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:core_model_first", "slug": "core_model_first"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 5, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is premature complexity. A model, design, or explanation has too many variables before anyone knows which relation matters most. This creates opaque realism: the output looks serious because it is detailed, but users cannot tell which assumptions drive the result.\n\nPremature complexity also creates fragile refinement. When later additions have no core to attach to, refinement becomes sprawl. The team may add detail in response to anxiety, stakeholder pressure, or data availability rather than because the model has a validated gap.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A model, design, explanation, plan, or prototype becomes complex too early, before the core causal structure, functional relation, or architectural spine is understood. Detail accumulates faster than understanding, making the result hard to test, hard to communicate, and easy to overfit to incidental cases."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P020-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O6", "O7"], ["O1", "O3", "O6", "O7"], ["O1", "O4", "O6", "O7"], ["O1", "O5", "O6", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must contain stakeholders engaged in actual debate about the representation being built.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Stakeholders are debating details of a model.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only when edge cases are among the prematurely debated details.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A complete detail branch is edge cases.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only when model features are among the prematurely debated details.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A complete detail branch is features.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only when parameter choices are among the prematurely debated details.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A complete detail branch is parameters.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only when exceptions are among the prematurely debated details.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "A complete detail branch is exceptions.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail absence of agreement on the model's core relation, not merely later refinement of an agreed core.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The main relationship the model must capture is not yet agreed.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the source ordering, with secondary-detail debate preceding core-relation agreement.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The detail debate occurs before agreement on the main relationship.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "Stakeholders are debating edge cases, features, parameters, or exceptions before agreeing on the main relationship the model must capture.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "stakeholders debate model details before agreeing its core relationship", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P020-C08-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Stakeholder analysis can clarify interests before any model or premature edge-case debate.", "slug": "stakeholder_analysis"}], "residual_id": "r:core_model_first:b017_a04_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b017_a04_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The pattern is especially useful when stakeholders are arguing over edge cases, implementation details, high-fidelity features, or many variables before they agree on the central relationship. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Stakeholders are debating edge cases, features, parameters, or exceptions before agreeing on the main relationship the model must capture.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders are debating edge cases, features, parameters, or exceptions before agreeing on the main relationship the model must capture.", "The pattern is especially useful when stakeholders are arguing over edge cases, implementation details, high-fidelity features, or many variables before they agree on the central relationship."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Stakeholder analysis can clarify interests before any model or premature edge-case debate.", "slug": "stakeholder_analysis"}], "normalized_requirement": "Stakeholders are debating edge cases, features, parameters, or exceptions before agreeing on the main relationship the model must capture.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Stakeholders are debating edge cases, features, parameters, or exceptions before agreeing on the main relationship the model must capture.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P020-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O6", "O7", "O8"], ["O1", "O3", "O6", "O7", "O8"], ["O1", "O4", "O6", "O7", "O8"], ["O1", "O5", "O6", "O7", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail an actual request for full fidelity, not only the availability or construction of a complex artifact.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A full-fidelity artifact is being requested.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only when the requested full-fidelity artifact is a model.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A complete artifact branch is a model.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only when the requested full-fidelity artifact is a prototype.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A complete artifact branch is a prototype.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only when the requested full-fidelity artifact is a simulation.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A complete artifact branch is a simulation.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only when the requested full-fidelity artifact is a plan.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "A complete artifact branch is a plan.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a low-complexity baseline as the relevant prior test target without requiring that the baseline is already available.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "A low-complexity baseline is the relevant prior test target.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require absence of a completed baseline test at the relevant time.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The low-complexity baseline has not been tested.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the request-before-test order rather than complexity introduced after a baseline result.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The full-fidelity request occurs before baseline testing.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "A full-fidelity model, prototype, simulation, or plan is being requested before a low-complexity baseline has been tested.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "full-fidelity artifact is requested before a simple baseline is tested", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P020-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An MVP is a solution apparatus and can exist without a prior request for full fidelity or an untested baseline.", "slug": "minimum_viable_product_mvp"}], "residual_id": "r:core_model_first:b017_a04_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b017_a04_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use Core Model First when complexity is arriving before understanding. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A full-fidelity model, prototype, simulation, or plan is being requested before a low-complexity baseline has been tested.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A full-fidelity model, prototype, simulation, or plan is being requested before a low-complexity baseline has been tested.", "Use Core Model First when complexity is arriving before understanding."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An MVP is a solution apparatus and can exist without a prior request for full fidelity or an untested baseline.", "slug": "minimum_viable_product_mvp"}], "normalized_requirement": "A full-fidelity model, prototype, simulation, or plan is being requested before a low-complexity baseline has been tested.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A full-fidelity model, prototype, simulation, or plan is being requested before a low-complexity baseline has been tested.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P020-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include the same team as the actor with the stated explanatory inability, without requiring that the team has assigned responsibility for explaining model structure.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The team is the actor whose explanation of the model elements is at issue.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only when variables are among the elements the team cannot classify.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A complete model-element branch is variables.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only when relations are among the elements the team cannot classify.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A complete model-element branch is relations.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the essential-versus-refinement comparison rather than generic uncertainty about the elements.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The required classification distinguishes essential elements from refinements.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail actual explanatory inability, not merely disagreement or an explanation that is difficult to communicate.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The team cannot explain how the relevant elements fall across that distinction.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "The team cannot explain which variables or relations are essential and which are refinements.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "team cannot distinguish essential model elements from refinements", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P020-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A shared model can be inconsistent for reasons other than inability to distinguish core variables from refinements.", "slug": "inconsistent_shared_model"}], "residual_id": "r:core_model_first:b017_a04_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b017_a04_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It also applies when a team needs a baseline for progressive refinement. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The team cannot explain which variables or relations are essential and which are refinements.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The team cannot explain which variables or relations are essential and which are refinements.", "It also applies when a team needs a baseline for progressive refinement."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A shared model can be inconsistent for reasons other than inability to distinguish core variables from refinements.", "slug": "inconsistent_shared_model"}], "normalized_requirement": "The team cannot explain which variables or relations are essential and which are refinements.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The team cannot explain which variables or relations are essential and which are refinements.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P020-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"], ["O1", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O4", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must contain added representational detail as the source of the contrasted effects.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Additional detail is introduced into the model or representation.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only when added detail increases confidence.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A complete increase branch is greater confidence caused by the added detail.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only when added detail increases cost.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A complete increase branch is greater cost caused by the added detail.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only when added detail increases apparent, not necessarily valid, realism.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A complete increase branch is greater apparent realism caused by the added detail.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only when the added detail does not improve the decision the representation is meant to support.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "A complete non-improvement branch is no improvement in the core decision.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only when the added detail does not improve the explanation the representation is meant to provide.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "A complete non-improvement branch is no improvement in the core explanation.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Added detail is increasing confidence, cost, or apparent realism without improving the core decision or explanation.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "added detail increases a superficial result without improving a core function", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P020-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Additive bias favors adding interventions or features but does not require detail to increase realism without core explanatory value.", "slug": "additive_bias"}], "residual_id": "r:core_model_first:b017_a04_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b017_a04_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This creates opaque realism: the output looks serious because it is detailed, but users cannot tell which assumptions drive the result. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Added detail is increasing confidence, cost, or apparent realism without improving the core decision or explanation.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Added detail is increasing confidence, cost, or apparent realism without improving the core decision or explanation.", "This creates opaque realism: the output looks serious because it is detailed, but users cannot tell which assumptions drive the result."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Additive bias favors adding interventions or features but does not require detail to increase realism without core explanatory value.", "slug": "additive_bias"}], "normalized_requirement": "Added detail is increasing confidence, cost, or apparent realism without improving the core decision or explanation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Added detail is increasing confidence, cost, or apparent realism without improving the core decision or explanation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P020-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require a staged refinement process rather than make staging merely optional.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The problem requires staged refinement.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must contain layers that are to be added through the staged refinement process.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The refinement adds conceptual or representational layers over stages.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail absence of a stable conceptual core, not merely an incomplete but stable one.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "No stable conceptual center is available.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the center-to-layer anchoring relation whose stable center is absent.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The missing conceptual center is the structure around which refinement layers would be organized.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "A problem requires staged refinement, but there is no stable conceptual center around which layers can be added.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "staged refinement lacks a stable conceptual center", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P020-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Refinement can proceed around a clear stable target and has the opposite state from a missing conceptual center.", "slug": "refinement"}], "residual_id": "r:core_model_first:b017_a04_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b017_a04_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "If later work will involve simulations, prototypes, policy variants, architectural layers, or explanatory nuance, the core model gives those layers a stable reference point. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A problem requires staged refinement, but there is no stable conceptual center around which layers can be added.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A problem requires staged refinement, but there is no stable conceptual center around which layers can be added.", "If later work will involve simulations, prototypes, policy variants, architectural layers, or explanatory nuance, the core model gives those layers a stable reference point."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Refinement can proceed around a clear stable target and has the opposite state from a missing conceptual center.", "slug": "refinement"}], "normalized_requirement": "A problem requires staged refinement, but there is no stable conceptual center around which layers can be added.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A problem requires staged refinement, but there is no stable conceptual center around which layers can be added.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 17, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-017", "ledger_sha256": "d63c7328913dbd0a29141fbb2c4088d0f5adc6bb0345e98cc3deef36881dd7de"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Correlated Proxy Monitoring", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:correlated_proxy_monitoring", "slug": "correlated_proxy_monitoring"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is delayed or blocked access to the state that matters. The system needs to act, but the target state is hidden, remote, slow to reveal itself, too expensive to check continuously, too invasive to measure directly, or only visible after damage has already occurred.\n\nThis creates a knowledge-action gap. Without an indirect signal, the system waits for lagging evidence and reacts late. With an invalid proxy, the system may act confidently on the wrong evidence. Correlated proxy monitoring solves neither problem by measurement alone; it solves them by governing the relationship between what is seen and what must be inferred.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "The relevant system state cannot be directly observed in time, but another observable state is meaningfully correlated with it."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a latent, diffuse, slow, expensive, or otherwise unreadable target.", "role_mapping": "Target state -> unobservable target; listed difficulty -> direct-read constraint.", "slug": "proxy_target_fidelity", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b017_a05_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The system needs to act, but the target state is hidden, remote, slow to reveal itself, too expensive to check continuously, too invasive to measure directly, or only visible after damage has already occurred. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The target state is hidden, remote, expensive, dangerous, slow, invasive, or otherwise hard to observe directly.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The target state is hidden, remote, expensive, dangerous, slow, invasive, or otherwise hard to observe directly.", "The system needs to act, but the target state is hidden, remote, slow to reveal itself, too expensive to check continuously, too invasive to measure directly, or only visible after damage has already occurred."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Proxy–Target Fidelity", "one_liner": "How faithfully an observable proxy tracks the unobservable target it stands in for — the degree to which acting on, optimizing, or inferring from the proxy is acting on the target itself.", "page_ref": "prime:proxy_target_fidelity", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Target state -> unobservable target; listed difficulty -> direct-read constraint.", "slug": "proxy_target_fidelity", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a latent, diffuse, slow, expensive, or otherwise unreadable target."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The target state is hidden, remote, expensive, dangerous, slow, invasive, or otherwise hard to observe directly.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires an observable proxy with some non-unit coupling to the target over the relevant regime.", "role_mapping": "Observable signal -> proxy; plausible correlation -> fidelity relation.", "slug": "proxy_target_fidelity", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b017_a05_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The relevant system state cannot be directly observed in time, but another observable state is meaningfully correlated with it. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Another observable signal is plausibly correlated with the target state.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Another observable signal is plausibly correlated with the target state.", "The relevant system state cannot be directly observed in time, but another observable state is meaningfully correlated with it."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Proxy–Target Fidelity", "one_liner": "How faithfully an observable proxy tracks the unobservable target it stands in for — the degree to which acting on, optimizing, or inferring from the proxy is acting on the target itself.", "page_ref": "prime:proxy_target_fidelity", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Observable signal -> proxy; plausible correlation -> fidelity relation.", "slug": "proxy_target_fidelity", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires an observable proxy with some non-unit coupling to the target over the relevant regime."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Another observable signal is plausibly correlated with the target state.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The proxy is appointed for a definite decision or inference because the target is not readable at the moment and cost needed.", "role_mapping": "Decision -> proxy use; unavailable direct measure -> target constraint.", "slug": "proxy_target_fidelity", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b017_a05_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The system needs knowledge of a target state faster, cheaper, or safer than direct measurement allows, but any substitute signal can mislead unless its relation to the target is validated, bounded, and periodically renewed. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Decisions must be made before definitive direct measurement is available.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Decisions must be made before definitive direct measurement is available.", "The system needs knowledge of a target state faster, cheaper, or safer than direct measurement allows, but any substitute signal can mislead unless its relation to the target is validated, bounded, and periodically renewed."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Proxy–Target Fidelity", "one_liner": "How faithfully an observable proxy tracks the unobservable target it stands in for — the degree to which acting on, optimizing, or inferring from the proxy is acting on the target itself.", "page_ref": "prime:proxy_target_fidelity", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Decision -> proxy use; unavailable direct measure -> target constraint.", "slug": "proxy_target_fidelity", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The proxy is appointed for a definite decision or inference because the target is not readable at the moment and cost needed."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Decisions must be made before definitive direct measurement is available.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Proxy error is tolerable only if it is measured, bounded, or reviewed.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is strongest when the proxy is observable sooner or more cheaply than the target, when the proxy-target relation can be validated, and when the response can tolerate bounded uncertainty. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: Proxy error is tolerable only if it is measured, bounded, or reviewed. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Proxy error is tolerable only if it is measured, bounded, or reviewed.", "It is strongest when the proxy is observable sooner or more cheaply than the target, when the proxy-target relation can be validated, and when the response can tolerate bounded uncertainty."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Proxy error is tolerable only if it is measured, bounded, or reviewed."}, {"display_text": "The proxy channel can be measured consistently enough over time to compare patterns.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: The proxy channel can be measured consistently enough over time to compare patterns. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The proxy channel can be measured consistently enough over time to compare patterns."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The proxy channel can be measured consistently enough over time to compare patterns."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 17, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-017", "ledger_sha256": "d63c7328913dbd0a29141fbb2c4088d0f5adc6bb0345e98cc3deef36881dd7de"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Correlation Structure Analysis for Pooling Effectiveness", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:correlation_structure_analysis_for_pooling_effectiveness", "slug": "correlation_structure_analysis_for_pooling_effectiveness"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A pool, portfolio, reserve, insurance fund, supplier set, project portfolio, infrastructure redundancy plan, or shared-capacity system is treated as diversified because it contains many members. However, the individual risks may be correlated through geography, market conditions, shared infrastructure, seasonal demand, policy rules, technology dependencies, climate, behavior, or cascading shocks. The apparent pool size therefore overstates the effective independent risk base.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A pool, portfolio, reserve, insurance fund, supplier set, project portfolio, infrastructure redundancy plan, or shared-capacity system is treated as diversified because it contains many members. However, the individual risks may be correlated through geography, market conditions, shared infrastructure, seasonal demand, policy rules, technology dependencies, climate, behavior, or cascading shocks. The apparent pool size therefore overstates the effective independent risk base."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime aggregates many exposures so the collective bears averaged risk and per-unit volatility falls.", "role_mapping": "Members -> exposures; pool -> aggregation mechanism; listed variation -> idiosyncratic risk.", "slug": "risk_pooling", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b017_a06_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A pool, portfolio, reserve, insurance fund, supplier set, project portfolio, infrastructure redundancy plan, or shared-capacity system is treated as diversified because it contains many members. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A pool is expected to absorb losses, variability, claims, demand surges, failures, or project disappointments across many members.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A pool is expected to absorb losses, variability, claims, demand surges, failures, or project disappointments across many members.", "A pool, portfolio, reserve, insurance fund, supplier set, project portfolio, infrastructure redundancy plan, or shared-capacity system is treated as diversified because it contains many members."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Risk Pooling", "one_liner": "Aggregating many independent or weakly correlated exposures so that the variance of the pooled outcome shrinks below the sum of individual variances, letting participants share a more predictable collective risk.", "page_ref": "prime:risk_pooling", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Members -> exposures; pool -> aggregation mechanism; listed variation -> idiosyncratic risk.", "slug": "risk_pooling", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime aggregates many exposures so the collective bears averaged risk and per-unit volatility falls."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A pool is expected to absorb losses, variability, claims, demand surges, failures, or project disappointments across many members.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P020-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must attribute the assumption to decision-makers, not state an impersonal correlation alone.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Decision-makers hold the size-to-stability belief.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only when scale is the quantity assumed to improve stability.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A complete size branch is greater scale.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may satisfy this branch only when membership count is the quantity assumed to improve stability.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A complete size branch is greater membership count.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the assumed automatic causal direction from size to greater stability.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The decision-makers assume the selected size increase automatically improves stability.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Decision-makers assume that scale or membership count automatically improves stability.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "decision-makers assume size automatically improves stability", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P020-C13-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Risk pooling can be applied with an explicit correlation model rather than a naive scale assumption.", "slug": "risk_pooling"}], "residual_id": "r:correlation_structure_analysis_for_pooling_effectiveness:b017_a06_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b017_a06_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Decision-makers assume that scale or membership count automatically improves stability. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Decision-makers assume that scale or membership count automatically improves stability."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A portfolio with many holdings but no count-based perception would not instantiate concentration illusion as defined; the exact record constitutively requires the perceived-versus-realized count split.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Concentration Illusion", "one_liner": "The failure where a portfolio looks diversified across many labels but its holdings share a hidden common factor — so a single shock moves them together and realized risk tracks the rank of the factor-exposure matrix, not the count of positions.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:concentration_illusion", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "concentration_illusion"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "concentration_illusion", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P020-C13-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record constitutively requires perceived diversification to depend on the count and labels of holdings while realized stability depends on hidden factors, directly satisfying the membership-count DNF branch."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Decision-makers assume that scale or membership count automatically improves stability.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime's successful regime can contain independent risks with no shared listed driver.", "slug": "risk_pooling"}], "residual_id": "r:correlation_structure_analysis_for_pooling_effectiveness:b017_a06_c3", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b017_a06_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "However, the individual risks may be correlated through geography, market conditions, shared infrastructure, seasonal demand, policy rules, technology dependencies, climate, behavior, or cascading shocks. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Several risks share geography, suppliers, platforms, markets, weather, regulators, behavior, or timing.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Several risks share geography, suppliers, platforms, markets, weather, regulators, behavior, or timing.", "However, the individual risks may be correlated through geography, market conditions, shared infrastructure, seasonal demand, policy rules, technology dependencies, climate, behavior, or cascading shocks."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime's successful regime can contain independent risks with no shared listed driver.", "slug": "risk_pooling"}], "normalized_requirement": "Several risks share geography, suppliers, platforms, markets, weather, regulators, behavior, or timing.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Several risks share geography, suppliers, platforms, markets, weather, regulators, behavior, or timing.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A well-designed pool can contain weakly correlated exposures with no severe common event.", "slug": "risk_pooling"}], "residual_id": "r:correlation_structure_analysis_for_pooling_effectiveness:b017_a06_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b017_a06_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A pool, portfolio, reserve, insurance fund, supplier set, project portfolio, infrastructure redundancy plan, or shared-capacity system is treated as diversified because it contains many members. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A severe event could affect many members at once, turning many small risks into one large correlated loss.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A severe event could affect many members at once, turning many small risks into one large correlated loss.", "A pool, portfolio, reserve, insurance fund, supplier set, project portfolio, infrastructure redundancy plan, or shared-capacity system is treated as diversified because it contains many members."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A well-designed pool can contain weakly correlated exposures with no severe common event.", "slug": "risk_pooling"}], "normalized_requirement": "A severe event could affect many members at once, turning many small risks into one large correlated loss.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A severe event could affect many members at once, turning many small risks into one large correlated loss.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P020-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must contain at least two members that are pooled together.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Multiple members are combined in a pool.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require relevant differences among pooled members, not a homogeneous pool.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The pooled members are heterogeneous.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern inter-member dependence rather than an unrelated effect of heterogeneity.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Dependence among member outcomes or risks is the relation at issue.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail actual epistemic uncertainty at pooling time, not a dependence effect that is known.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The pooler does not know how heterogeneity affects dependence.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve uncertainty between the two directions without asserting either direction as the actual effect.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The unresolved direction includes both possible reduction and possible increase in dependence.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Heterogeneous members are pooled without knowing whether heterogeneity reduces or increases dependence.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "heterogeneous members are pooled with unknown dependence effect", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P020-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Pool governance can know its dependence structure, and heterogeneity is not mandatory.", "slug": "risk_pooling"}], "residual_id": "r:correlation_structure_analysis_for_pooling_effectiveness:b017_a06_c7", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b017_a06_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A pool, portfolio, reserve, insurance fund, supplier set, project portfolio, infrastructure redundancy plan, or shared-capacity system is treated as diversified because it contains many members. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Heterogeneous members are pooled without knowing whether heterogeneity reduces or increases dependence.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Heterogeneous members are pooled without knowing whether heterogeneity reduces or increases dependence.", "A pool, portfolio, reserve, insurance fund, supplier set, project portfolio, infrastructure redundancy plan, or shared-capacity system is treated as diversified because it contains many members."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Pool governance can know its dependence structure, and heterogeneity is not mandatory.", "slug": "risk_pooling"}], "normalized_requirement": "Heterogeneous members are pooled without knowing whether heterogeneity reduces or increases dependence.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Heterogeneous members are pooled without knowing whether heterogeneity reduces or increases dependence.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Past performance is based on normal-period losses but the pool must survive crisis or tail states.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Past performance is based on normal-period losses but the pool must survive crisis or tail states. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Past performance is based on normal-period losses but the pool must survive crisis or tail states."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Past performance is based on normal-period losses but the pool must survive crisis or tail states."}, {"display_text": "Pricing, reserves, reinsurance, buffers, staffing, supplier selection, or project allocation depends on the expected pooling gain.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A pool, portfolio, reserve, insurance fund, supplier set, project portfolio, infrastructure redundancy plan, or shared-capacity system is treated as diversified because it contains many members. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Pricing, reserves, reinsurance, buffers, staffing, supplier selection, or project allocation depends on the expected pooling gain. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Pricing, reserves, reinsurance, buffers, staffing, supplier selection, or project allocation depends on the expected pooling gain.", "A pool, portfolio, reserve, insurance fund, supplier set, project portfolio, infrastructure redundancy plan, or shared-capacity system is treated as diversified because it contains many members."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Pricing, reserves, reinsurance, buffers, staffing, supplier selection, or project allocation depends on the expected pooling gain."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 17, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-017", "ledger_sha256": "d63c7328913dbd0a29141fbb2c4088d0f5adc6bb0345e98cc3deef36881dd7de"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Correlation Structure Characterization", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:correlation_structure_characterization", "slug": "correlation_structure_characterization"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 4, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 5 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 4 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A decision system either assumes variables are independent when they systematically co-vary, or it notices an association and compresses it into an unqualified coefficient. The result can double-count duplicated evidence, overstate diversification, miss indirect signals, hide subgroup reversals, chase chance patterns, or turn descriptive association into an unsupported causal intervention.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A decision system either assumes variables are independent when they systematically co-vary, or it notices an association and compresses it into an unqualified coefficient. The result can double-count duplicated evidence, overstate diversification, miss indirect signals, hide subgroup reversals, chase chance patterns, or turn descriptive association into an unsupported causal intervention."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires joint observations whose distribution exhibits directionless dependence or shared information.", "role_mapping": "Variables -> paired measures; linked information -> statistical dependence.", "slug": "correlation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b017_a07_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Several measured variables may carry overlapping or linked information. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Several measured variables may carry overlapping or linked information."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Correlation", "one_liner": "Systematic co-variation between variables, distinct from causation.", "page_ref": "prime:correlation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Variables -> paired measures; linked information -> statistical dependence.", "slug": "correlation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires joint observations whose distribution exhibits directionless dependence or shared information."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Several measured variables may carry overlapping or linked information.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P021-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must make a relationship or association, not an isolated variable, the object being characterized.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The focal object is a relationship or association.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve apparent or perceived strength and may not replace it with verified objective strength.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The relationship appears strong without requiring that its strength be established.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only if the candidate necessarily leaves the relationship's form unknown.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The relationship's form is unknown.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only if the candidate necessarily leaves the temporal lag unknown.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The relationship's lag is unknown.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only if the candidate necessarily leaves variation across subgroups unknown.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The relationship's subgroup dependence is unknown.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only if the candidate necessarily leaves the association's uncertainty unknown.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The relationship's uncertainty is unknown.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only if the candidate necessarily leaves stability over relevant conditions or time unknown.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The relationship's stability is unknown.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "An apparently strong relationship has unknown form, lag, subgroup dependence, uncertainty, or stability.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An apparently strong relationship lacks known characterization on at least one listed dimension.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P021-C01-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A correlation can have known functional form, lag, uncertainty, and stability.", "slug": "correlation"}], "residual_id": "r:correlation_structure_characterization:b017_a07_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b017_a07_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A useful summary must compress joint behavior enough to guide reasoning, yet preserve enough context, form, uncertainty, and instability to prevent the summary from becoming a false universal law or causal story. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A relationship appears strong but its form, lag, subgroup dependence, uncertainty, or stability is unknown.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A relationship appears strong but its form, lag, subgroup dependence, uncertainty, or stability is unknown.", "A useful summary must compress joint behavior enough to guide reasoning, yet preserve enough context, form, uncertainty, and instability to prevent the summary from becoming a false universal law or causal story."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A correlation can have known functional form, lag, uncertainty, and stability.", "slug": "correlation"}], "normalized_requirement": "A relationship appears strong but its form, lag, subgroup dependence, uncertainty, or stability is unknown.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A relationship appears strong but its form, lag, subgroup dependence, uncertainty, or stability is unknown.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Correlation includes nonlinear dependence but most correlated situations do not have zero linear coefficient.", "slug": "correlation"}], "residual_id": "r:correlation_structure_characterization:b017_a07_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b017_a07_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A zero linear coefficient conflicts with visible nonlinear or segmented structure. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A zero linear coefficient conflicts with visible nonlinear or segmented structure."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Correlation includes nonlinear dependence but most correlated situations do not have zero linear coefficient.", "slug": "correlation"}], "normalized_requirement": "A zero linear coefficient conflicts with visible nonlinear or segmented structure.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A zero linear coefficient conflicts with visible nonlinear or segmented structure.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P021-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require a search across variables rather than a prespecified assessment of one association.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The generating process is a search over variables.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail broad or numerous search scope, not merely the existence of a search.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The variable search is large.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must make the associations outputs of the search, not unrelated associations considered afterward.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The large search has produced the associations at issue.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve apparent interestingness and cannot require confirmed importance or validity.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The produced associations appear interesting rather than being established as substantively valid.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "A large search over variables has produced apparently interesting associations.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A large variable search produces associations that appear interesting.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P021-C02-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Correlation can be prespecified between two variables and need not result from a large search.", "slug": "correlation"}], "residual_id": "r:correlation_structure_characterization:b017_a07_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b017_a07_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A decision system either assumes variables are independent when they systematically co-vary, or it notices an association and compresses it into an unqualified coefficient. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A large search over variables has produced apparently interesting associations.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A large search over variables has produced apparently interesting associations.", "A decision system either assumes variables are independent when they systematically co-vary, or it notices an association and compresses it into an unqualified coefficient."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Correlation can be prespecified between two variables and need not result from a large search.", "slug": "correlation"}], "normalized_requirement": "A large search over variables has produced apparently interesting associations.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A large search over variables has produced apparently interesting associations.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A correlation can be stable within a fixed joint distribution and need not be deployed.", "slug": "correlation"}], "residual_id": "r:correlation_structure_characterization:b017_a07_c7", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b017_a07_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The environment or data pipeline may change the relationship after deployment. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The environment or data pipeline may change the relationship after deployment."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A correlation can be stable within a fixed joint distribution and need not be deployed.", "slug": "correlation"}], "normalized_requirement": "The environment or data pipeline may change the relationship after deployment.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The environment or data pipeline may change the relationship after deployment.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A prediction, monitoring, diversification, allocation, or diagnostic decision depends on whether observations move together.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: A prediction, monitoring, diversification, allocation, or diagnostic decision depends on whether observations move together. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A prediction, monitoring, diversification, allocation, or diagnostic decision depends on whether observations move together."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "A prediction, monitoring, diversification, allocation, or diagnostic decision depends on whether observations move together."}, {"display_text": "A proxy or early indicator is being considered for operational use.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: A proxy or early indicator is being considered for operational use. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A proxy or early indicator is being considered for operational use."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "A proxy or early indicator is being considered for operational use."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 17, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-017", "ledger_sha256": "d63c7328913dbd0a29141fbb2c4088d0f5adc6bb0345e98cc3deef36881dd7de"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Correspondence Validation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:correspondence_validation", "slug": "correspondence_validation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 2 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 2}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is replacement under incomplete continuity. A new system may be better overall, more modern, more general, or more efficient, yet still fail in cases where the old system was reliable. Because attention is often drawn toward the new capability, old-domain regressions may remain hidden until users, dependent systems, or high-stakes cases encounter them.\n\nThis problem is common when old systems are messy but valuable. They may contain tacit knowledge, edge-case handling, compatibility promises, historical conventions, or user expectations that were never fully documented. When the replacement is evaluated only on new goals, the hidden value of old behavior can disappear.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A proposed successor may fail to preserve behavior that was already relied upon within the predecessor's established domain."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "This branch preserves the complete remedy-free diagnostic route; goals, feasibility clauses, gates, deployment constraints, and supporting context remain outside the DNF."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "EXT001-C025", "dnf": [["EXT001-U025-O1"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"obligation_id": "EXT001-U025-O1", "predicate": "The predecessor has an established domain in which its behavior is relied upon."}], "predicate": "The predecessor has an established domain in which its behavior is relied upon.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "The predecessor has an established domain in which its behavior is relied upon.", "unit_id": "EXT001-U025"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"catalog_exhaustion": "CONDITION_LEVEL", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The predecessor has an established domain in which its behavior is relied upon.", "slug": "supersession"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The predecessor has an established domain in which its behavior is relied upon.", "slug": "develops_from_relation"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The predecessor has an established domain in which its behavior is relied upon.", "slug": "remediation"}], "residual_id": "EXT001:correspondence_validation:C02", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding."}}, "condition_id": "ext001_correspondence_validation_a02", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored trigger_conditions, structural_problem fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: The predecessor has an established domain in which its behavior is relied upon.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The predecessor has an established domain in which its behavior is relied upon."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The predecessor has an established domain in which its behavior is relied upon.", "slug": "supersession"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The predecessor has an established domain in which its behavior is relied upon.", "slug": "develops_from_relation"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The predecessor has an established domain in which its behavior is relied upon.", "slug": "remediation"}], "normalized_requirement": "The predecessor has an established domain in which its behavior is relied upon.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The predecessor has an established domain in which its behavior is relied upon.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "EXT001-C026", "dnf": [["EXT001-U026-O1"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"obligation_id": "EXT001-U026-O1", "predicate": "An overlap domain permits meaningful comparison of predecessor and successor behavior."}], "predicate": "An overlap domain permits meaningful comparison of predecessor and successor behavior.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An overlap domain permits meaningful comparison of predecessor and successor behavior.", "unit_id": "EXT001-U026"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"catalog_exhaustion": "CONDITION_LEVEL", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: An overlap domain permits meaningful comparison of predecessor and successor behavior.", "slug": "comparison"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: An overlap domain permits meaningful comparison of predecessor and successor behavior.", "slug": "juxtaposition"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: An overlap domain permits meaningful comparison of predecessor and successor behavior.", "slug": "analogy"}], "residual_id": "EXT001:correspondence_validation:C03", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding."}}, "condition_id": "ext001_correspondence_validation_a03", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored trigger_conditions, structural_problem fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: An overlap domain permits meaningful comparison of predecessor and successor behavior.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["An overlap domain permits meaningful comparison of predecessor and successor behavior."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: An overlap domain permits meaningful comparison of predecessor and successor behavior.", "slug": "comparison"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: An overlap domain permits meaningful comparison of predecessor and successor behavior.", "slug": "juxtaposition"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: An overlap domain permits meaningful comparison of predecessor and successor behavior.", "slug": "analogy"}], "normalized_requirement": "An overlap domain permits meaningful comparison of predecessor and successor behavior.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "An overlap domain permits meaningful comparison of predecessor and successor behavior.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A new model, rule, version, workflow, policy, or system is proposed as a successor to an existing one.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored trigger_conditions, structural_problem fields; the source file was not modified. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: A new model, rule, version, workflow, policy, or system is proposed as a successor to an existing one. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A new model, rule, version, workflow, policy, or system is proposed as a successor to an existing one.", "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored trigger_conditions, structural_problem fields; the source file was not modified."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "A new model, rule, version, workflow, policy, or system is proposed as a successor to an existing one."}, {"display_text": "Regression in the established domain would impose material continuity, safety, trust, compliance, or operational cost.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored trigger_conditions, structural_problem fields; the source file was not modified. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: Regression in the established domain would impose material continuity, safety, trust, compliance, or operational cost. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Regression in the established domain would impose material continuity, safety, trust, compliance, or operational cost.", "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored trigger_conditions, structural_problem fields; the source file was not modified."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Regression in the established domain would impose material continuity, safety, trust, compliance, or operational cost."}, {"display_text": "Advantages in new cases may conceal breakage in old cases.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored trigger_conditions, structural_problem fields; the source file was not modified. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Advantages in new cases may conceal breakage in old cases. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Advantages in new cases may conceal breakage in old cases.", "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored trigger_conditions, structural_problem fields; the source file was not modified."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Advantages in new cases may conceal breakage in old cases."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"candidate_ledger_sha256": "96f72d2139077fd57bf795048ebef33b3fd574b20963170080ec916b5b3b92fe", "extension_id": "new-archetypes-extension-001", "ledger_id": "prime-production-v1.2-extension-001", "ledger_sha256": "9644520614744632d1d36da44b1acd77ce432852c6083eb871203521c166efce"}, "base_projection_sha256": "841e0c7f3cb8e8054475ad29a8a14745a416b4fc115559a44878b94292e673ec", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "ca09ed9fe1598ce7072755b530de5553f5ee0a7cd64ae82d9e4a4e2149a37788", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Correspondence Violation Detection and Theory Refinement", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:correspondence_violation_detection_and_theory_refinement", "slug": "correspondence_violation_detection_and_theory_refinement"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 3, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 3 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A new theory, model, method, instrument, process, classification, or explanatory frame is expected to recover an older or simpler formulation in known regimes, but discrepancies appear. Without a disciplined process, the discrepancy may be ignored as noise, misread as total refutation, overfit away, or repaired in a way that breaks cases that were already understood. The system lacks a bridge from correspondence failure to precise refinement.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A new theory, model, method, instrument, process, classification, or explanatory frame is expected to recover an older or simpler formulation in known regimes, but discrepancies appear. Without a disciplined process, the discrepancy may be ignored as noise, misread as total refutation, overfit away, or repaired in a way that breaks cases that were already understood. The system lacks a bridge from correspondence failure to precise refinement."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P021-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must distinguish a new successor model or theory from the predecessor it is assessed against.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A new model or theory is the successor account.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require a predecessor that is older and trusted in the relevant regime, not an arbitrary comparator.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The comparison target is a trusted older theory.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail that the successor should reproduce the predecessor, rather than merely that comparison is possible.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Reproduction of the predecessor is normatively expected.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must supply a successor-to-predecessor correspondence requirement under the same normative modality and must not require that reproduction already occurs.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The required reproduction or correspondence relation is directed from the new account to the trusted predecessor.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must restrict the requirement to a limiting, overlap, benchmark, known-valid, or equivalently warranted regime.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The reproduction requirement applies within a regime where predecessor correspondence is warranted.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "A new model or theory should reproduce a trusted older theory in a regime where correspondence is expected.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A new account should reproduce a trusted predecessor within a regime where the predecessor is valid.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P021-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Refinement can improve a model without a predecessor correspondence requirement or limiting-case recovery.", "slug": "refinement"}], "residual_id": "r:correspondence_violation_detection_and_theory_refinement:b017_a08_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b017_a08_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A new theory, model, method, instrument, process, classification, or explanatory frame is expected to recover an older or simpler formulation in known regimes, but discrepancies appear. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A new model or theory should reproduce a trusted older theory in a limiting case, overlap domain, benchmark case, or known-valid regime.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A new model or theory should reproduce a trusted older theory in a limiting case, overlap domain, benchmark case, or known-valid regime.", "A new theory, model, method, instrument, process, classification, or explanatory frame is expected to recover an older or simpler formulation in known regimes, but discrepancies appear."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Refinement can improve a model without a predecessor correspondence requirement or limiting-case recovery.", "slug": "refinement"}], "normalized_requirement": "A new model or theory should reproduce a trusted older theory in a limiting case, overlap domain, benchmark case, or known-valid regime.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A new model or theory should reproduce a trusted older theory in a limiting case, overlap domain, benchmark case, or known-valid regime.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a formally unchanged instrument or specification whose interpretive practice changes, producing longitudinal disagreement where continuity was expected.", "role_mapping": "Versions/instruments -> time slices; expected continuity -> held specification; disagreement -> practice drift.", "slug": "instrument_interpretive_drift", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b017_a08_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A new theory, model, method, instrument, process, classification, or explanatory frame is expected to recover an older or simpler formulation in known regimes, but discrepancies appear. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Two versions, instruments, taxonomies, simulations, or operational processes disagree where continuity was expected.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Two versions, instruments, taxonomies, simulations, or operational processes disagree where continuity was expected.", "A new theory, model, method, instrument, process, classification, or explanatory frame is expected to recover an older or simpler formulation in known regimes, but discrepancies appear."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Instrument Interpretive Drift", "one_liner": "A measurement instrument's interpretive practice silently shifts over time while its stated specification stays fixed, contaminating longitudinal trends.", "page_ref": "prime:instrument_interpretive_drift", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Versions/instruments -> time slices; expected continuity -> held specification; disagreement -> practice drift.", "slug": "instrument_interpretive_drift", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a formally unchanged instrument or specification whose interpretive practice changes, producing longitudinal disagreement where continuity was expected."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Two versions, instruments, taxonomies, simulations, or operational processes disagree where continuity was expected.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P021-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must keep one model as the subject of both the broad-success and bounded-failure claims.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The same model is evaluated across broad and bounded domains.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require broad success, not merely one successful case.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The model works broadly outside or across the larger domain.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail failure, not merely uncertain or weaker performance, within the localized regime.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The model fails in the bounded regime.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require recurrent failure and cannot be satisfied by a single discordant case.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The bounded-regime failure occurs repeatedly.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must localize recurrent failure to a specific bounded regime rather than diffuse failure everywhere.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The failures are concentrated in a specific population, range, scale, context, boundary condition, or equivalent bounded regime.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the within-model contrast between general success and localized recurrent failure.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "Broad success is contrasted with repeated failure in the specific regime.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "A broadly successful model fails repeatedly in a specific bounded regime.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Broad model success coexists with recurrent failure concentrated in a bounded regime.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P021-C04-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Negative case analysis can find one discordant case and does not require repeated failures clustered in a specific regime.", "slug": "negative_case_analysis"}], "residual_id": "r:correspondence_violation_detection_and_theory_refinement:b017_a08_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b017_a08_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A model works broadly but fails repeatedly for a specific population, parameter range, scale, context, or boundary condition. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A model works broadly but fails repeatedly for a specific population, parameter range, scale, context, or boundary condition."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Negative case analysis can find one discordant case and does not require repeated failures clustered in a specific regime.", "slug": "negative_case_analysis"}], "normalized_requirement": "A model works broadly but fails repeatedly for a specific population, parameter range, scale, context, or boundary condition.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A model works broadly but fails repeatedly for a specific population, parameter range, scale, context, or boundary condition.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P021-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O5", "O6"], ["O2", "O5", "O6"], ["O3", "O5", "O6"], ["O4", "O5", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires the discrepant result to arise from a benchmark.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A benchmark produces the result at issue.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires the discrepant result to arise from a regression test.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A regression test produces the result at issue.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires the discrepant result to arise from a field observation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A field observation produces the result at issue.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires the discrepant result to arise from an implementation.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "An implementation produces the result at issue.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail disagreement or correspondence violation, not merely a surprising but compatible result.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The produced result violates an agreement criterion.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must make agreement expected or required, not infer an expectation solely from the later discrepancy.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "Agreement was expected before the result was observed.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "A benchmark, regression test, field observation, or implementation produces a result that violates expected agreement.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "One listed evaluation or operational source yields a result contrary to expected agreement.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P021-C05-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Instrument drift specifically requires longitudinal practice change under a fixed specification, not every benchmark or implementation disagreement.", "slug": "instrument_interpretive_drift"}], "residual_id": "r:correspondence_violation_detection_and_theory_refinement:b017_a08_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b017_a08_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A benchmark, regression test, field observation, or implementation produces a result that violates expected agreement. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A benchmark, regression test, field observation, or implementation produces a result that violates expected agreement."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A mutable answer key that still agrees with its construct is not gold-standard erosion, so the expected-correspondence violation cannot be removed.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Gold-Standard Erosion", "one_liner": "Recognize that a model scored against a mutable reference label can show stable metrics while its real validity silently degrades, because the answer key — not the model — has drifted away from the construct it once operationalized.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:gold_standard_erosion", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "gold_standard_erosion"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "gold_standard_erosion", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P021-C05-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires evaluation against a reference intended to operationalize a construct and a metric that ceases to track real validity as that reference erodes."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "If instrumented and production behavior agreed, the observation-conditional disappearance that defines a heisenbug would be absent.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Heisenbug", "one_liner": "Name the software defect whose failure vanishes under observation because attaching a debugger, adding a print, or disabling optimization perturbs the timing window or interleaving it rides on — so disappearance-under-observation is the diagnostic tell, not evidence the bug is gone.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:heisenbug", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "heisenbug"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "heisenbug", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P021-C05-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires an implementation failure to disappear under observation because instrumentation perturbs the execution profile, violating the apparatus’s assumed transparency."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "If the implemented hit result always agreed with the intended target across the expected operator population, the defining touch-target miss would not exist.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Touch-Target Miss", "one_liner": "Reclassify a mistyped tap from operator error to interface defect by reading the miss rate off the mismatch between a control's target geometry and the operator population's motor precision — a geometric scan Fitts's Law makes quantitative.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:touch_target_miss", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "touch_target_miss"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "touch_target_miss", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P021-C05-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires an operator aiming at one control, a mismatched responsive geometry, and a resulting miss or adjacent activation under expected conditions."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "If preprocessing respected the held-out boundary and the metric remained honest, the exact imputation-leakage mechanism would be absent.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Imputation Leakage", "one_liner": "The model-evaluation failure in which a missing-value repair step is fit across the train/test boundary, so its parameters encode facts about the held-out rows — inflating performance that survives into the test metric, because imputation, mentally filed as data cleaning, is really a model.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:imputation_leakage", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "imputation_leakage"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "imputation_leakage", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P021-C05-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires a train/test epistemic firewall, cross-boundary preprocessing, and an optimistically inflated test metric that fails the benchmark’s intended independence."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "If identical instances retained the same labels under the unchanged rubric, the longitudinal disagreement defining annotation drift would be absent.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Annotation Drift", "one_liner": "The gradual, undocumented shift over time in how annotators apply an unchanged rubric, so identical instances get different labels — a silent recalibration of a measurement instrument, invisible to within-slice agreement and detectable only by re-annotating frozen gold.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:annotation_drift", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "annotation_drift"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "annotation_drift", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P021-C05-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires a stable formal rubric, nominally identical instances, and different labels at separated times because the implemented interpretive practice drifted."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A benchmark, regression test, field observation, or implementation produces a result that violates expected agreement.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Decision-makers are tempted either to dismiss the anomaly as noise or to abandon the theory without diagnosing why it failed.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The danger is either over-preserving old theory by explaining away genuine violations or over-revising the new theory by reacting to noise, translation error, or implementation defects. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Decision-makers are tempted either to dismiss the anomaly as noise or to abandon the theory without diagnosing why it failed. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Decision-makers are tempted either to dismiss the anomaly as noise or to abandon the theory without diagnosing why it failed.", "The danger is either over-preserving old theory by explaining away genuine violations or over-revising the new theory by reacting to noise, translation error, or implementation defects."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Decision-makers are tempted either to dismiss the anomaly as noise or to abandon the theory without diagnosing why it failed."}, {"display_text": "A revision must preserve known successes while addressing the violation.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: A revision must preserve known successes while addressing the violation. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A revision must preserve known successes while addressing the violation."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "A revision must preserve known successes while addressing the violation."}, {"display_text": "The practical value lies in identifying where and why correspondence breaks, not merely declaring pass or fail.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: The practical value lies in identifying where and why correspondence breaks, not merely declaring pass or fail. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The practical value lies in identifying where and why correspondence breaks, not merely declaring pass or fail."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "The practical value lies in identifying where and why correspondence breaks, not merely declaring pass or fail."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 17, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-017", "ledger_sha256": "d63c7328913dbd0a29141fbb2c4088d0f5adc6bb0345e98cc3deef36881dd7de"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Cost-Asymmetric Preference Revelation Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:cost_asymmetric_preference_revelation_design", "slug": "cost_asymmetric_preference_revelation_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 5, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A group, market, organization, public, platform, polity, or community treats visible expressions of preference as though they faithfully represent held preferences even though expressing some preferences is much more costly than expressing others. Actors therefore voice, endorse, repeat, vote for, or remain silent around the lower-cost position, causing public signal, perceived norms, and downstream decisions to diverge from the private distribution.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A group, market, organization, public, platform, polity, or community treats visible expressions of preference as though they faithfully represent held preferences even though expressing some preferences is much more costly than expressing others. Actors therefore voice, endorse, repeat, vote for, or remain silent around the lower-cost position, causing public signal, perceived norms, and downstream decisions to diverge from the private distribution."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires voicing the held preference to cost more than expressing silence or an orthodox alternative.", "role_mapping": "Expression costs -> cost asymmetry; positions -> held versus cheaper voiced preference.", "slug": "preference_falsification", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b017_a09_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Asymmetric expression costs exist. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Asymmetric expression costs exist"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Preference Falsification", "one_liner": "Under asymmetric cost on expression, agents voice a cheaper preference than the one they privately hold, so the visible distribution diverges from the held one.", "page_ref": "prime:preference_falsification", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Expression costs -> cost asymmetry; positions -> held versus cheaper voiced preference.", "slug": "preference_falsification", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires voicing the held preference to cost more than expressing silence or an orthodox alternative."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Asymmetric expression costs exist.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires the visible distribution to be the signal other agents use to estimate held preferences.", "role_mapping": "Visible expression -> strategically voiced preference; evidence -> perception loop.", "slug": "preference_falsification", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime requires public conduct to be the available estimator of the private distribution and to be misread as conviction.", "role_mapping": "Visible signal -> public distribution; inferred preference -> private distribution estimate.", "slug": "private_public_preference_divergence", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b017_a09_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Public decision systems need visible expression to coordinate, but visible expression becomes unreliable when the cost of truth varies by preference, actor, and context. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Visible expression is used as evidence of preference.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Visible expression is used as evidence of preference", "Public decision systems need visible expression to coordinate, but visible expression becomes unreliable when the cost of truth varies by preference, actor, and context."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Preference Falsification", "one_liner": "Under asymmetric cost on expression, agents voice a cheaper preference than the one they privately hold, so the visible distribution diverges from the held one.", "page_ref": "prime:preference_falsification", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Visible expression -> strategically voiced preference; evidence -> perception loop.", "slug": "preference_falsification", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires the visible distribution to be the signal other agents use to estimate held preferences."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Private-Public Preference Divergence", "one_liner": "A systematic gap between the distribution of privately-held preferences (or beliefs) in a group and the distribution publicly expressed or inferred, sustained because each member reads others' conformity as conviction and conforms in turn.", "page_ref": "prime:private_public_preference_divergence", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Visible signal -> public distribution; inferred preference -> private distribution estimate.", "slug": "private_public_preference_divergence", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires public conduct to be the available estimator of the private distribution and to be misread as conviction."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Visible expression is used as evidence of preference.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime definitionally preserves the privately held preference while a cheaper different preference is voiced.", "role_mapping": "Private preference -> held ordering; public signal -> expressed preference; divergence -> gap.", "slug": "preference_falsification", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime's load-bearing object is the systematic gap between held and publicly expressed distributions.", "role_mapping": "Private/public -> first-order and visible distributions; divergence -> systematic gap.", "slug": "private_public_preference_divergence", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b017_a09_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Actors therefore voice, endorse, repeat, vote for, or remain silent around the lower-cost position, causing public signal, perceived norms, and downstream decisions to diverge from the private distribution. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Private preference can plausibly diverge from public signal.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Private preference can plausibly diverge from public signal", "Actors therefore voice, endorse, repeat, vote for, or remain silent around the lower-cost position, causing public signal, perceived norms, and downstream decisions to diverge from the private distribution."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Preference Falsification", "one_liner": "Under asymmetric cost on expression, agents voice a cheaper preference than the one they privately hold, so the visible distribution diverges from the held one.", "page_ref": "prime:preference_falsification", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Private preference -> held ordering; public signal -> expressed preference; divergence -> gap.", "slug": "preference_falsification", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime definitionally preserves the privately held preference while a cheaper different preference is voiced."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Private-Public Preference Divergence", "one_liner": "A systematic gap between the distribution of privately-held preferences (or beliefs) in a group and the distribution publicly expressed or inferred, sustained because each member reads others' conformity as conviction and conforms in turn.", "page_ref": "prime:private_public_preference_divergence", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Private/public -> first-order and visible distributions; divergence -> systematic gap.", "slug": "private_public_preference_divergence", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's load-bearing object is the systematic gap between held and publicly expressed distributions."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Private preference can plausibly diverge from public signal.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires reputational, professional, social, political, or material cost asymmetry to make one expression cheaper.", "role_mapping": "Retaliation/reward -> expression cost structure; credibility -> strategic response.", "slug": "preference_falsification", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b017_a09_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Retaliation or reward structures are credible. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Retaliation or reward structures are credible"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Preference Falsification", "one_liner": "Under asymmetric cost on expression, agents voice a cheaper preference than the one they privately hold, so the visible distribution diverges from the held one.", "page_ref": "prime:preference_falsification", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Retaliation/reward -> expression cost structure; credibility -> strategic response.", "slug": "preference_falsification", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires reputational, professional, social, political, or material cost asymmetry to make one expression cheaper."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Retaliation or reward structures are credible.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Preference falsification can create a visible gap before any downstream decision or norm is affected.", "slug": "preference_falsification"}], "residual_id": "r:cost_asymmetric_preference_revelation_design:b017_a09_c5", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b017_a09_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Actors therefore voice, endorse, repeat, vote for, or remain silent around the lower-cost position, causing public signal, perceived norms, and downstream decisions to diverge from the private distribution. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The distorted public distribution affects decisions or norms.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The distorted public distribution affects decisions or norms", "Actors therefore voice, endorse, repeat, vote for, or remain silent around the lower-cost position, causing public signal, perceived norms, and downstream decisions to diverge from the private distribution."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Preference falsification can create a visible gap before any downstream decision or norm is affected.", "slug": "preference_falsification"}], "normalized_requirement": "The distorted public distribution affects decisions or norms.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The distorted public distribution affects decisions or norms.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Under the prime's credible expression-cost asymmetry, direct public solicitation preserves the incentive to voice the cheaper preference and is therefore unsafe or unreliable.", "role_mapping": "Demand honesty -> direct expression channel; unsafe/unreliable -> cost-distorted report.", "slug": "preference_falsification", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b017_a09_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Direct demand for honesty would be unsafe or unreliable. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Direct demand for honesty would be unsafe or unreliable"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Preference Falsification", "one_liner": "Under asymmetric cost on expression, agents voice a cheaper preference than the one they privately hold, so the visible distribution diverges from the held one.", "page_ref": "prime:preference_falsification", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Demand honesty -> direct expression channel; unsafe/unreliable -> cost-distorted report.", "slug": "preference_falsification", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Under the prime's credible expression-cost asymmetry, direct public solicitation preserves the incentive to voice the cheaper preference and is therefore unsafe or unreliable."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Direct demand for honesty would be unsafe or unreliable.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 17, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-017", "ledger_sha256": "d63c7328913dbd0a29141fbb2c4088d0f5adc6bb0345e98cc3deef36881dd7de"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Counterexample Boundary-Shift Audit", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:counterexample_boundary_shift_audit", "slug": "counterexample_boundary_shift_audit"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 5, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A universal or category-based claim encounters a counterexample. Instead of accepting the counterexample, weakening the quantifier, narrowing the claim by a principled prior criterion, or revising the theory, the claimant redefines membership in the subject category to exclude the counterexample. The claim is preserved, but the subject category is emptied of independent content because membership increasingly means “being the kind of case that satisfies the claim.”", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A universal or category-based claim encounters a counterexample. Instead of accepting the counterexample, weakening the quantifier, narrowing the claim by a principled prior criterion, or revising the theory, the claimant redefines membership in the subject category to exclude the counterexample. The claim is preserved, but the subject category is emptied of independent content because membership increasingly means “being the kind of case that satisfies the claim.”"}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a universal claim asserting predicate Y of every member of category X.", "role_mapping": "Universal identity form -> all-X-are-Y claim.", "slug": "no_true_scotsman", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b017_a10_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A claim has a universal, near-universal, purity, essence, or identity form such as “all X are Y” or “real X do Y.” The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A claim has a universal, near-universal, purity, essence, or identity form such as “all X are Y” or “real X do Y.”"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "No True Scotsman", "one_liner": "When a counterexample to a universal claim appears, membership in the subject category is redefined to exclude it, preserving the claim by emptying it of content.", "page_ref": "prime:no_true_scotsman", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Universal identity form -> all-X-are-Y claim.", "slug": "no_true_scotsman", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a universal claim asserting predicate Y of every member of category X."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A claim has a universal, near-universal, purity, essence, or identity form such as all X are Y or real X do Y.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires an uncontroversial X that is not Y and therefore falsifies the universal as originally scoped.", "role_mapping": "Case -> counterexample; category -> X; violated predicate -> not-Y.", "slug": "no_true_scotsman", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b017_a10_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The claim is preserved, but the subject category is emptied of independent content because membership increasingly means “being the kind of case that satisfies the claim.” The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A case is presented that appears to belong to the subject category while violating the asserted predicate.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A case is presented that appears to belong to the subject category while violating the asserted predicate.", "The claim is preserved, but the subject category is emptied of independent content because membership increasingly means “being the kind of case that satisfies the claim.”"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "No True Scotsman", "one_liner": "When a counterexample to a universal claim appears, membership in the subject category is redefined to exclude it, preserving the claim by emptying it of content.", "page_ref": "prime:no_true_scotsman", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Case -> counterexample; category -> X; violated predicate -> not-Y.", "slug": "no_true_scotsman", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires an uncontroversial X that is not Y and therefore falsifies the universal as originally scoped."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A case is presented that appears to belong to the subject category while violating the asserted predicate.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a post-hoc protective redefinition—canonically no true X—after the embarrassing case appears.", "role_mapping": "True/real language -> membership tightening; timing -> post-counterexample.", "slug": "no_true_scotsman", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b017_a10_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The response introduces “true,” “real,” “genuine,” “authentic,” “proper,” or “not really one of us” language after the counterexample appears. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The response introduces “true,” “real,” “genuine,” “authentic,” “proper,” or “not really one of us” language after the counterexample appears."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "No True Scotsman", "one_liner": "When a counterexample to a universal claim appears, membership in the subject category is redefined to exclude it, preserving the claim by emptying it of content.", "page_ref": "prime:no_true_scotsman", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "True/real language -> membership tightening; timing -> post-counterexample.", "slug": "no_true_scotsman", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a post-hoc protective redefinition—canonically no true X—after the embarrassing case appears."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The response introduces true, real, genuine, authentic, proper, or not really one of us language after the counterexample appears.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's temporal diagnostic compares the pre-challenge criterion with a reverse-engineered post-hoc exclusion.", "role_mapping": "Before/after criteria -> temporal test; difference -> protective redefinition.", "slug": "no_true_scotsman", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b017_a10_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Membership criteria were vague, implicit, or different before the challenge than after the challenge. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Membership criteria were vague, implicit, or different before the challenge than after the challenge."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "No True Scotsman", "one_liner": "When a counterexample to a universal claim appears, membership in the subject category is redefined to exclude it, preserving the claim by emptying it of content.", "page_ref": "prime:no_true_scotsman", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Before/after criteria -> temporal test; difference -> protective redefinition.", "slug": "no_true_scotsman", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's temporal diagnostic compares the pre-challenge criterion with a reverse-engineered post-hoc exclusion."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Membership criteria were vague, implicit, or different before the challenge than after the challenge.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's vacuity invariant makes membership depend on Y, eliminating its independent testability and using scope as a defense.", "role_mapping": "Flexible category -> redefined X; defense -> immunized universal.", "slug": "no_true_scotsman", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b017_a10_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Instead of accepting the counterexample, weakening the quantifier, narrowing the claim by a principled prior criterion, or revising the theory, the claimant redefines membership in the subject category to exclude the counterexample. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The claimant treats category membership as a flexible defense of the claim rather than as an independently testable condition.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The claimant treats category membership as a flexible defense of the claim rather than as an independently testable condition.", "Instead of accepting the counterexample, weakening the quantifier, narrowing the claim by a principled prior criterion, or revising the theory, the claimant redefines membership in the subject category to exclude the counterexample."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "No True Scotsman", "one_liner": "When a counterexample to a universal claim appears, membership in the subject category is redefined to exclude it, preserving the claim by emptying it of content.", "page_ref": "prime:no_true_scotsman", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Flexible category -> redefined X; defense -> immunized universal.", "slug": "no_true_scotsman", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's vacuity invariant makes membership depend on Y, eliminating its independent testability and using scope as a defense."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The claimant treats category membership as a flexible defense of the claim rather than as an independently testable condition.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P021-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require multiple or recurrent counterexamples, not a single counterexample.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Counterexamples occur repeatedly.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve both the claim and the boundary governing which cases fall under it.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A claim and its applicable category or domain boundary are the response targets.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must link counterexample handling to exclusion through boundary contraction.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The counterexamples are handled by contracting the claim boundary.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require recurrent contraction rather than one post-hoc boundary change.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Boundary contraction is repeated as counterexamples recur.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must exclude claim revision as the response and preserve the instead-of contrast.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The claim is not revised; boundary contraction is used instead.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Repeated counterexamples are handled by repeated boundary contraction instead of claim revision.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Recurrent counterexamples prompt recurrent boundary contraction while the claim is not revised.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P021-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "One counterexample and one post-hoc redefinition suffice; repetition is not mandatory.", "slug": "no_true_scotsman"}], "residual_id": "r:counterexample_boundary_shift_audit:b017_a10_c7", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b017_a10_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A universal or category-based claim encounters a counterexample. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Repeated counterexamples are handled by repeated boundary contraction instead of by claim revision.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Repeated counterexamples are handled by repeated boundary contraction instead of by claim revision.", "A universal or category-based claim encounters a counterexample."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "One counterexample and one post-hoc redefinition suffice; repetition is not mandatory.", "slug": "no_true_scotsman"}], "normalized_requirement": "Repeated counterexamples are handled by repeated boundary contraction instead of by claim revision.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Repeated counterexamples are handled by repeated boundary contraction instead of by claim revision.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The category carries social, moral, institutional, scientific, or identity stakes that make admitting exceptions costly.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The category carries social, moral, institutional, scientific, or identity stakes that make admitting exceptions costly. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The category carries social, moral, institutional, scientific, or identity stakes that make admitting exceptions costly."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The category carries social, moral, institutional, scientific, or identity stakes that make admitting exceptions costly."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 17, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-017", "ledger_sha256": "d63c7328913dbd0a29141fbb2c4088d0f5adc6bb0345e98cc3deef36881dd7de"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Counterexample Search", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:counterexample_search", "slug": "counterexample_search"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 4 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is one-sided visibility. Supporting examples are salient because they were noticed, collected, rewarded, or easy to explain. Breaking cases may be rare, embarrassing, hidden at edges, excluded by sampling, or dismissed as noise. As a result, a rule can become trusted before anyone knows where it stops applying.\n\nCounterexample Search treats that gap as a design problem. Instead of asking whether the rule has support, it asks what would count as an in-scope violation and where such a violation would most likely be found.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A generalization, rule, diagnosis, model pattern, or strategic claim is accepted because fitting cases are salient while breaking cases are absent, hidden, inconvenient, or never deliberately sought."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P021-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must make a claim, rule, or equivalent proposition the target of generalization.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A claim is the conclusion being generalized.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail an inference from examples, cases, or observations to a broader claim.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The claim is generalized from an observed evidence base.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require visible affirmative evidence as the generalization basis, not arbitrary or explicitly disconfirming evidence.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The evidence base is visible and affirmative or fitting, as illustrated by successful cases or repeated observations.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "A claim is being generalized from visible affirmative examples or observations.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A claim is generalized from visible affirmative evidence.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P021-C08-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Negative case analysis can audit a deductive model or classification not generalized from visible successes.", "slug": "negative_case_analysis"}], "residual_id": "r:counterexample_search:b017_a11_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b017_a11_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially valuable when the claim uses broad language, when failure at the boundary would be costly, when a group is attached to the claim, or when rare cases matter more than average cases. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A claim is being generalized from visible examples, successful cases, or repeated observations.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A claim is being generalized from visible examples, successful cases, or repeated observations.", "It is especially valuable when the claim uses broad language, when failure at the boundary would be costly, when a group is attached to the claim, or when rare cases matter more than average cases."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A hypothesis fixed independently of the observed fitting pattern is explicitly not HARKing, so the evidence-to-claim direction cannot be removed.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "HARKing (Hypothesizing After the Results are Known)", "one_liner": "The research practice of building a hypothesis by inspecting already-collected data and then presenting it as if it had been specified in advance, silently inflating the reported false-positive rate because the test's independence assumption is violated.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:harking", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "harking"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "harking", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P021-C08-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires a hypothesis to be formulated from inspected, already-collected patterns that appeared significant, then presented as a broader prior prediction."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Without the broader impression drawn from the visible confirming subset, selective presentation alone would not satisfy the exact cherry-picking identity.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Cherry Picking", "one_liner": "Selectively presenting confirming evidence while suppressing disconfirming evidence from the same available population, so the offered sample gives an impression the full distribution would not support — locating the dishonesty in the selection process, not the individual data points.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:cherry_picking", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "cherry_picking"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "cherry_picking", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P021-C08-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires confirming evidence to be displayed while contrary evidence is hidden, producing an unwarranted inference about the full evidence population."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "If the reasoner did not generalize from the visible covered subset to the population, the inferential leap defining the spotlight fallacy would be missing.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Spotlight Fallacy", "one_liner": "Infer that a property is common in a population because it is prominent in coverage of it — mistaking a selection bias for a base rate, since an attention-allocating channel surfaces cases by newsworthiness rather than by frequency.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:spotlight_fallacy", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "spotlight_fallacy"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "spotlight_fallacy", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P021-C08-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires a reasoner to read a population property from cases surfaced by an attention-allocating visibility channel."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A claim is being generalized from visible examples, successful cases, or repeated observations.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A bounded probabilistic or classificatory account can undergo negative-case analysis without universal language.", "slug": "negative_case_analysis"}], "residual_id": "r:counterexample_search:b017_a11_c3", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b017_a11_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially valuable when the claim uses broad language, when failure at the boundary would be costly, when a group is attached to the claim, or when rare cases matter more than average cases. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The rule contains broad language such as always, never, usually, all, safe, reliable, sufficient, or necessary.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The rule contains broad language such as always, never, usually, all, safe, reliable, sufficient, or necessary.", "It is especially valuable when the claim uses broad language, when failure at the boundary would be costly, when a group is attached to the claim, or when rare cases matter more than average cases."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A bounded probabilistic or classificatory account can undergo negative-case analysis without universal language.", "slug": "negative_case_analysis"}], "normalized_requirement": "The rule contains broad language such as always, never, usually, all, safe, reliable, sufficient, or necessary.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The rule contains broad language such as always, never, usually, all, safe, reliable, sufficient, or necessary.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The deliberate search can discover an unsuspected discordant case and need not begin from known edge conditions.", "slug": "negative_case_analysis"}], "residual_id": "r:counterexample_search:b017_a11_c4", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b017_a11_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Known edge conditions, subgroups, time shifts, adversarial conditions, or exceptional contexts might violate the rule. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Known edge conditions, subgroups, time shifts, adversarial conditions, or exceptional contexts might violate the rule."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The deliberate search can discover an unsuspected discordant case and need not begin from known edge conditions.", "slug": "negative_case_analysis"}], "normalized_requirement": "Known edge conditions, subgroups, time shifts, adversarial conditions, or exceptional contexts might violate the rule.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Known edge conditions, subgroups, time shifts, adversarial conditions, or exceptional contexts might violate the rule.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "A current account is deliberately exposed to discordant cases and then falsified, narrowed, revised, or explicitly rescoped in an iterative loop.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A current account is deliberately exposed to discordant cases and then falsified, narrowed, revised, or explicitly rescoped in an iterative loop.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The decision cost of being wrong is significant enough that supporting evidence alone is insufficient.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The decision cost of being wrong is significant enough that supporting evidence alone is insufficient. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The decision cost of being wrong is significant enough that supporting evidence alone is insufficient."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "The decision cost of being wrong is significant enough that supporting evidence alone is insufficient."}, {"display_text": "A group has incentives, habits, or confirmation bias that make disconfirming cases socially or cognitively easy to ignore.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially valuable when the claim uses broad language, when failure at the boundary would be costly, when a group is attached to the claim, or when rare cases matter more than average cases. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: A group has incentives, habits, or confirmation bias that make disconfirming cases socially or cognitively easy to ignore. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A group has incentives, habits, or confirmation bias that make disconfirming cases socially or cognitively easy to ignore.", "It is especially valuable when the claim uses broad language, when failure at the boundary would be costly, when a group is attached to the claim, or when rare cases matter more than average cases."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "A group has incentives, habits, or confirmation bias that make disconfirming cases socially or cognitively easy to ignore."}, {"display_text": "A pattern-detection, diagnostic, policy, or design process needs a deliberately negative test before adoption.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Typical triggers include a diagnostic explanation that fits most signs, a policy rule that seems fair in standard cases, a software rule that passes normal inputs, a strategic thesis based on successful examples, or a research generalization that has not been checked against negative cases. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: A pattern-detection, diagnostic, policy, or design process needs a deliberately negative test before adoption. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A pattern-detection, diagnostic, policy, or design process needs a deliberately negative test before adoption.", "Typical triggers include a diagnostic explanation that fits most signs, a policy rule that seems fair in standard cases, a software rule that passes normal inputs, a strategic thesis based on successful examples, or a research generalization that has not been checked against negative cases."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "A pattern-detection, diagnostic, policy, or design process needs a deliberately negative test before adoption."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 17, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-017", "ledger_sha256": "d63c7328913dbd0a29141fbb2c4088d0f5adc6bb0345e98cc3deef36881dd7de"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Counterfactual Comparison", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:counterfactual_comparison", "slug": "counterfactual_comparison"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 2, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is outcome-only interpretation. People see what happened and treat it as the full evidence of what a decision was worth or what an intervention caused. This is attractive because observed outcomes are concrete, while the unchosen path is invisible. But the invisible path is often the path that matters.\n\nA good outcome after an action does not prove the action helped. A bad outcome after a decision does not prove the decision was poor. A decline after a policy does not prove the policy caused decline; the no-policy path might have been worse. An improvement after a program does not prove the program caused improvement; the same trend might have happened anyway. Without a counterfactual comparison, actors can mistake luck, trend, selection, regression to the mean, or baseline choice for evidence.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Actors evaluate an action, policy, intervention, exposure, or decision using only the observed outcome. They infer success, failure, causation, harm, inevitability, or responsibility without comparing the actual path to a plausible alternative path that did not occur. This makes interpretation vulnerable to hindsight bias, selection effects, baseline manipulation, regression to the mean, and stories that sound causal but do not identify the difference made by the focal condition."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime constructs an absent-intervention baseline, subtracts it from the observed intervention outcome, and attributes the residual to the intervention.", "role_mapping": "Outcome -> observed term; decision/intervention -> treatment; attribution -> residual effect.", "slug": "counterfactual_subtraction", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b017_a12_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A bad outcome after a decision does not prove the decision was poor. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: An outcome is being attributed to a decision or intervention.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["An outcome is being attributed to a decision or intervention.", "A bad outcome after a decision does not prove the decision was poor."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Counterfactual Subtraction", "one_liner": "An effect is estimated by subtracting a constructed baseline representing what would have obtained absent the intervention, so the inference rests on the baseline's credibility, not the arithmetic.", "page_ref": "prime:counterfactual_subtraction", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Outcome -> observed term; decision/intervention -> treatment; attribution -> residual effect.", "slug": "counterfactual_subtraction", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime constructs an absent-intervention baseline, subtracts it from the observed intervention outcome, and attributes the residual to the intervention."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "An outcome is being attributed to a decision or intervention.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P021-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must make a decision or action choice the evaluated object, not merely evaluate an outcome itself.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A decision is the object being evaluated.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must link evaluation of the decision to the result produced or observed.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The decision is judged using its result as the basis.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require the terminal outcome rather than an interim signal or ex ante information.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The basis is the final result.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must exclude other bases from the judgment; merely including the outcome is insufficient.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The final result is the sole basis for judgment.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}], "predicate": "A decision is judged by the final result alone.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Decision quality is evaluated exclusively from its final outcome.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P021-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Counterfactual subtraction can be designed before any outcome-only judgment occurs.", "slug": "counterfactual_subtraction"}], "residual_id": "r:counterfactual_comparison:b017_a12_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b017_a12_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The pattern is especially important when a decision is being judged by its result alone, when a program is being evaluated by pre/post change, when a product or policy change is credited for a metric movement, or when a retrospective review is assigning blame or praise. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A decision is judged by the final result alone.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A decision is judged by the final result alone.", "The pattern is especially important when a decision is being judged by its result alone, when a program is being evaluated by pre/post change, when a product or policy change is credited for a metric movement, or when a retrospective review is assigning blame or praise."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Counterfactual subtraction can be designed before any outcome-only judgment occurs.", "slug": "counterfactual_subtraction"}], "normalized_requirement": "A decision is judged by the final result alone.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A decision is judged by the final result alone.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P021-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"], ["O1", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern the baseline against which an actual or focal state is compared.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The focal object is a comparison baseline.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires an unstated or tacit baseline, not merely a baseline that is difficult to measure.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The baseline is implicit rather than explicitly stated.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires genuine dispute over the baseline, not mere uncertainty about its numerical value.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The baseline is contested by relevant parties or interpretations.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "A baseline is implicit or contested.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A comparison baseline is either unstated or disputed.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P021-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The constructed baseline and identifying assumption can be explicit and uncontested.", "slug": "counterfactual_subtraction"}], "residual_id": "r:counterfactual_comparison:b017_a12_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b017_a12_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A baseline is implicit or contested. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A baseline is implicit or contested."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A standard accepted and held fixed after qualifying evidence arrives is explicitly not moving the goalposts, so the contested-baseline branch is necessary.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Moving the goalposts", "one_liner": "An argumentative pattern in which, on being shown evidence that meets a previously stipulated standard, one party revises the standard upward to block the conclusion rather than accept it — repeated so that no finite evidence can settle the question.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:moving_the_goalposts", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "moving_the_goalposts"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "moving_the_goalposts", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P021-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires a previously stipulated criterion to be met and then revised by one party to prevent the expected conclusion."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Once both options are evaluated without the current course serving as the implicit reference, the fresh-start test has removed the status-quo trap.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Status Quo Trap", "one_liner": "Frame status quo bias as a named trap a single deliberating actor can counter: recognise that the current course wins only because the switch must be defended while the staying is not, then run the fresh-start counterfactual that forces it to compete on its merits.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:status_quo_trap", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "status_quo_trap"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "status_quo_trap", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P021-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record makes the incumbent state an unexamined reference point whose asymmetrical burden silently structures the stay-or-switch comparison."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A baseline is implicit or contested.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a constructed baseline because what would have happened absent the intervention is unobserved in the treated case.", "role_mapping": "Alternative path -> counterfactual baseline; cannot observe -> construction requirement.", "slug": "counterfactual_subtraction", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b017_a12_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is also useful when the relevant alternative is contested. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The relevant alternative path cannot be directly observed.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The relevant alternative path cannot be directly observed.", "It is also useful when the relevant alternative is contested."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Counterfactual Subtraction", "one_liner": "An effect is estimated by subtracting a constructed baseline representing what would have obtained absent the intervention, so the inference rests on the baseline's credibility, not the arithmetic.", "page_ref": "prime:counterfactual_subtraction", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Alternative path -> counterfactual baseline; cannot observe -> construction requirement.", "slug": "counterfactual_subtraction", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a constructed baseline because what would have happened absent the intervention is unobserved in the treated case."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The relevant alternative path cannot be directly observed.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P021-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must apply the attribution to an outcome, not only to a plan, actor, or initial condition.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An outcome is the object of the attribution.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail an attribution or evaluation and cannot replace it with objective proof.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The outcome is treated or represented in a particular modal way.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must specifically entail that the outcome is treated as unavoidable, not merely likely or difficult to prevent.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The attributed modality is inevitability or impossibility of avoidance.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "An outcome is treated as unavoidable.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An outcome receives an attribution of inevitability.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P021-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Counterfactual estimation need not respond to an inevitability claim.", "slug": "counterfactual_subtraction"}], "residual_id": "r:counterfactual_comparison:b017_a12_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b017_a12_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: An outcome is treated as inevitable or impossible to avoid. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["An outcome is treated as inevitable or impossible to avoid."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_SYNTHESIS", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "After selecting the exact inevitability level, a complete instance cannot treat the realized outcome as avoidable without contradicting the named level and guard.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Hindsight Bias", "one_liner": "The tendency, once an outcome is known, to inflate its perceived prior probability and misremember one's own judgment as closer to it than it was, because outcome knowledge is folded into the memory of the prior situation and reconstructs rather than retrieves it.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:hindsight_bias", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O3"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "inevitability_level_manifested", "predicate": "The hindsight-bias manifestation is the inevitability level for the realized outcome.", "rationale": "The exact record supplies the structural spine and one anchored atomic branch selector closes the sole modal gap without laundering roles or relations."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "hindsight_bias"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "inevitability_level_manifested"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "hindsight_bias", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P021-C12-U1", "why_it_fits": "Neither raw pass is fully universal: the exact record permits milder hindsight bias, but one atomic selector for its named inevitability level yields the source relation."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "After selecting the exact record’s named inevitable branch, a complete candidate instance cannot represent the terminus as avoidable without contradicting the guard.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Slippery Slope", "one_liner": "Flag a consequence-chain argument as fallacious when its inter-step links are held together only by conceivability rather than a demonstrated mechanism, so it blocks a proposal by gesturing at a speculative terminus.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:slippery_slope", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O3"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "terminus_presented_as_inevitable", "predicate": "The consequence-chain argument presents its objectionable terminus as inevitable.", "rationale": "The exact record supplies the structural spine and one anchored atomic branch selector closes the sole modal gap without laundering roles or relations."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "slippery_slope"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "terminus_presented_as_inevitable"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "slippery_slope", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P021-C12-U1", "why_it_fits": "The candidate supplies the outcome-attribution spine, and one branch-selection fact restricts the exact named modality to inevitability rather than merely high probability."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "An outcome is treated as inevitable or impossible to avoid.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The decision use is high-stakes enough that casual what-if reasoning is inadequate.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "People see what happened and treat it as the full evidence of what a decision was worth or what an intervention caused. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The decision use is high-stakes enough that casual what-if reasoning is inadequate. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The decision use is high-stakes enough that casual what-if reasoning is inadequate.", "People see what happened and treat it as the full evidence of what a decision was worth or what an intervention caused."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The decision use is high-stakes enough that casual what-if reasoning is inadequate."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 17, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-017", "ledger_sha256": "d63c7328913dbd0a29141fbb2c4088d0f5adc6bb0345e98cc3deef36881dd7de"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Counterfactual Proximity Signal Calibration", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:counterfactual_proximity_signal_calibration", "slug": "counterfactual_proximity_signal_calibration"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 5 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Outcome-only evaluation erases distance to value-changing alternatives, while vivid counterfactual imagination can overstate it. A failed attempt that was nearly successful, a safe operation that nearly harmed someone, or a decision that almost entered a better path may contain information that binary success/failure labels miss. But if proximity is not explicitly bounded, the system confuses almost-success with success, almost-harm with harm, or imagined regret with valid evidence.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Outcome-only evaluation erases distance to value-changing alternatives, while vivid counterfactual imagination can overstate it. A failed attempt that was nearly successful, a safe operation that nearly harmed someone, or a decision that almost entered a better path may contain information that binary success/failure labels miss. But if proximity is not explicitly bounded, the system confuses almost-success with success, almost-harm with harm, or imagined regret with valid evidence."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A nearby different-valued counterfactual may vary continuously or by causal-branch distance without crossing a meaningful threshold.", "slug": "counterfactual_proximity_weighting"}], "residual_id": "r:counterfactual_proximity_signal_calibration:b017_a13_c1", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b017_a13_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A case lands just short of, just beyond, or just beside a meaningful threshold. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A case lands just short of, just beyond, or just beside a meaningful threshold."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A nearby different-valued counterfactual may vary continuously or by causal-branch distance without crossing a meaningful threshold.", "slug": "counterfactual_proximity_weighting"}], "normalized_requirement": "A case lands just short of, just beyond, or just beside a meaningful threshold.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A case lands just short of, just beyond, or just beside a meaningful threshold.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime permits nonhuman downstream updates such as a risk-register or investment-posture change that need not change attention or motivation.", "slug": "counterfactual_proximity_weighting"}], "residual_id": "r:counterfactual_proximity_signal_calibration:b017_a13_c2", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b017_a13_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A failed attempt that was nearly successful, a safe operation that nearly harmed someone, or a decision that almost entered a better path may contain information that binary success/failure labels miss. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A near miss, close call, almost-win, almost-loss, or narrowly avoided harm changes attention or motivation.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A near miss, close call, almost-win, almost-loss, or narrowly avoided harm changes attention or motivation.", "A failed attempt that was nearly successful, a safe operation that nearly harmed someone, or a decision that almost entered a better path may contain information that binary success/failure labels miss."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime permits nonhuman downstream updates such as a risk-register or investment-posture change that need not change attention or motivation.", "slug": "counterfactual_proximity_weighting"}], "normalized_requirement": "A near miss, close call, almost-win, almost-loss, or narrowly avoided harm changes attention or motivation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A near miss, close call, almost-win, almost-loss, or narrowly avoided harm changes attention or motivation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A proximity-weighted signal can drive another kind of behavioral or affective update without serving any listed guidance use.", "slug": "counterfactual_proximity_weighting"}], "residual_id": "r:counterfactual_proximity_signal_calibration:b017_a13_c3", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b017_a13_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Binary outcome records preserve factual integrity, but learning and motivation often depend on graded distance to nearby alternatives that the binary record omits. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The actual outcome alone is too coarse to guide learning, training, safety response, or decision review.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The actual outcome alone is too coarse to guide learning, training, safety response, or decision review.", "Binary outcome records preserve factual integrity, but learning and motivation often depend on graded distance to nearby alternatives that the binary record omits."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A proximity-weighted signal can drive another kind of behavioral or affective update without serving any listed guidance use.", "slug": "counterfactual_proximity_weighting"}], "normalized_requirement": "The actual outcome alone is too coarse to guide learning, training, safety response, or decision review.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The actual outcome alone is too coarse to guide learning, training, safety response, or decision review.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a nearby alternative of meaningfully different value and an auditable distance in the relevant state space.", "role_mapping": "Plausible nearby alternative -> counterfactual; fixed facts -> state-space distance discipline.", "slug": "counterfactual_proximity_weighting", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b017_a13_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Outcome-only evaluation erases distance to value-changing alternatives, while vivid counterfactual imagination can overstate it. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A plausible nearby counterfactual of different value can be specified without altering fixed facts arbitrarily.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A plausible nearby counterfactual of different value can be specified without altering fixed facts arbitrarily.", "Outcome-only evaluation erases distance to value-changing alternatives, while vivid counterfactual imagination can overstate it."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Counterfactual Proximity Weighting", "one_liner": "An internal signal is graded not by the outcome alone but by its distance to a nearby counterfactual outcome of different value, so near misses carry near-reward signals.", "page_ref": "prime:counterfactual_proximity_weighting", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Plausible nearby alternative -> counterfactual; fixed facts -> state-space distance discipline.", "slug": "counterfactual_proximity_weighting", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a nearby alternative of meaningfully different value and an auditable distance in the relevant state space."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A plausible nearby counterfactual of different value can be specified without altering fixed facts arbitrarily.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P021-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the system as the entity susceptible to the failure mode.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A system is the bearer of the vulnerability.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail susceptibility or risk and cannot require actual normalization or overreaction.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The system is vulnerable to a failure without requiring that the failure has occurred.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires susceptibility to treating near misses as normal and must not require that normalization has occurred.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "One vulnerability target is normalization of near misses.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires susceptibility to excessive response to vivid anecdotal almost-events and must not require that overreaction has occurred.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The other vulnerability target is overreaction to vivid anecdotal almost-events.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "A system is vulnerable to normalizing near misses or overreacting to vivid anecdotal almost-events.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A system is susceptible to one of two opposing near-event calibration failures.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P021-C13-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A correctly calibrated proximity weight need not suffer either failure.", "slug": "counterfactual_proximity_weighting"}], "residual_id": "r:counterfactual_proximity_signal_calibration:b017_a13_c7", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b017_a13_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A system is vulnerable to either normalizing near misses or overreacting to vivid anecdotal almost-events. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A system is vulnerable to either normalizing near misses or overreacting to vivid anecdotal almost-events."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A correctly calibrated proximity weight need not suffer either failure.", "slug": "counterfactual_proximity_weighting"}], "normalized_requirement": "A system is vulnerable to either normalizing near misses or overreacting to vivid anecdotal almost-events.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A system is vulnerable to either normalizing near misses or overreacting to vivid anecdotal almost-events.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "People are reacting emotionally to what almost happened rather than to what happened.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: People are reacting emotionally to what almost happened rather than to what happened. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["People are reacting emotionally to what almost happened rather than to what happened."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "People are reacting emotionally to what almost happened rather than to what happened."}, {"display_text": "Outcome data are sparse but near-miss data are abundant enough to serve as early evidence.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Outcome data are sparse but near-miss data are abundant enough to serve as early evidence. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Outcome data are sparse but near-miss data are abundant enough to serve as early evidence."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Outcome data are sparse but near-miss data are abundant enough to serve as early evidence."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 17, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-017", "ledger_sha256": "d63c7328913dbd0a29141fbb2c4088d0f5adc6bb0345e98cc3deef36881dd7de"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Counterflow Gradient Preservation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:counterflow_gradient_preservation", "slug": "counterflow_gradient_preservation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Two streams or ordered sequences can exchange a useful quantity through a shared interface, but their contact arrangement rapidly erodes the driving difference. Under co-current or poorly staged flow, the streams approach one another near the inlet, local transfer stalls, downstream interface area is underused, and terminal targets require excessive area, extreme inlet conditions, repeated utilities, or unacceptable loss. The system may appear well coupled in aggregate while maldistribution, backmixing, capacity imbalance, or fouling collapses the local profile that actually determines exchange.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Two streams or ordered sequences can exchange a useful quantity through a shared interface, but their contact arrangement rapidly erodes the driving difference. Under co-current or poorly staged flow, the streams approach one another near the inlet, local transfer stalls, downstream interface area is underused, and terminal targets require excessive area, extreme inlet conditions, repeated utilities, or unacceptable loss. The system may appear well coupled in aggregate while maldistribution, backmixing, capacity imbalance, or fouling collapses the local profile that actually determines exchange."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires two distinct flows carrying an exchangeable quantity along a shared interface.", "role_mapping": "Streams/lanes -> flows; target quantity -> exchanged heat, mass, momentum, or information.", "slug": "counter_current_exchange", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b017_a14_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Two streams or ordered sequences can exchange a useful quantity through a shared interface, but their contact arrangement rapidly erodes the driving difference. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A target quantity can cross between two distinguishable streams, lanes, phases, populations, or ordered sequences while bulk separation remains meaningful.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A target quantity can cross between two distinguishable streams, lanes, phases, populations, or ordered sequences while bulk separation remains meaningful.", "Two streams or ordered sequences can exchange a useful quantity through a shared interface, but their contact arrangement rapidly erodes the driving difference."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Counter-Current Exchange", "one_liner": "Two streams flowing in opposite directions along a shared interface preserve a near-constant driving gradient along the whole contact, lifting extraction efficiency toward unity.", "page_ref": "prime:counter_current_exchange", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Streams/lanes -> flows; target quantity -> exchanged heat, mass, momentum, or information.", "slug": "counter_current_exchange", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires two distinct flows carrying an exchangeable quantity along a shared interface."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A target quantity can cross between two distinguishable streams, lanes, phases, populations, or ordered sequences while bulk separation remains meaningful.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires local exchange rate to be a function of the instantaneous state difference between streams.", "role_mapping": "Listed difference -> driving gradient; transfer rate -> local exchange law.", "slug": "counter_current_exchange", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b017_a14_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Under co-current or poorly staged flow, the streams approach one another near the inlet, local transfer stalls, downstream interface area is underused, and terminal targets require excessive area, extreme inlet conditions, repeated utilities, or unacceptable loss. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The transfer rate depends on a local state difference such as temperature, concentration, partial pressure, potential, quality, freshness, or another defensible gradient.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The transfer rate depends on a local state difference such as temperature, concentration, partial pressure, potential, quality, freshness, or another defensible gradient.", "Under co-current or poorly staged flow, the streams approach one another near the inlet, local transfer stalls, downstream interface area is underused, and terminal targets require excessive area, extreme inlet conditions, repeated utilities, or unacceptable loss."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Counter-Current Exchange", "one_liner": "Two streams flowing in opposite directions along a shared interface preserve a near-constant driving gradient along the whole contact, lifting extraction efficiency toward unity.", "page_ref": "prime:counter_current_exchange", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Listed difference -> driving gradient; transfer rate -> local exchange law.", "slug": "counter_current_exchange", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires local exchange rate to be a function of the instantaneous state difference between streams."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The transfer rate depends on a local state difference such as temperature, concentration, partial pressure, potential, quality, freshness, or another defensible gradient.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires extended shared contact whose relative flow direction determines which states encounter each other.", "role_mapping": "Extended contact -> interface length; encounter order -> opposed flow geometry.", "slug": "counter_current_exchange", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b017_a14_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "High exchange effectiveness favors long, intimate, well-ordered contact and small terminal approach differences. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Contact can be extended spatially or staged sequentially so the relative order of encounters is a design choice.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Contact can be extended spatially or staged sequentially so the relative order of encounters is a design choice.", "High exchange effectiveness favors long, intimate, well-ordered contact and small terminal approach differences."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Counter-Current Exchange", "one_liner": "Two streams flowing in opposite directions along a shared interface preserve a near-constant driving gradient along the whole contact, lifting extraction efficiency toward unity.", "page_ref": "prime:counter_current_exchange", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Extended contact -> interface length; encounter order -> opposed flow geometry.", "slug": "counter_current_exchange", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires extended shared contact whose relative flow direction determines which states encounter each other."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Contact can be extended spatially or staged sequentially so the relative order of encounters is a design choice.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's defining contrast is that co-current geometry collapses the gradient and caps extraction while opposed flow preserves it.", "role_mapping": "Co-current contact -> comparison geometry; early equilibration -> gradient collapse.", "slug": "counter_current_exchange", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b017_a14_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Under co-current or poorly staged flow, the streams approach one another near the inlet, local transfer stalls, downstream interface area is underused, and terminal targets require excessive area, extreme inlet conditions, repeated utilities, or unacceptable loss. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Co-current, batch, or unordered contact produces early equilibration, weak downstream driving force, excessive utility demand, or low recovery.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Co-current, batch, or unordered contact produces early equilibration, weak downstream driving force, excessive utility demand, or low recovery.", "Under co-current or poorly staged flow, the streams approach one another near the inlet, local transfer stalls, downstream interface area is underused, and terminal targets require excessive area, extreme inlet conditions, repeated utilities, or unacceptable loss."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Counter-Current Exchange", "one_liner": "Two streams flowing in opposite directions along a shared interface preserve a near-constant driving gradient along the whole contact, lifting extraction efficiency toward unity.", "page_ref": "prime:counter_current_exchange", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Co-current contact -> comparison geometry; early equilibration -> gradient collapse.", "slug": "counter_current_exchange", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's defining contrast is that co-current geometry collapses the gradient and caps extraction while opposed flow preserves it."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Co-current, batch, or unordered contact produces early equilibration, weak downstream driving force, excessive utility demand, or low recovery.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The two streams have measurable inlet states, transfer capacities, and safe outlet ranges.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Under co-current or poorly staged flow, the streams approach one another near the inlet, local transfer stalls, downstream interface area is underused, and terminal targets require excessive area, extreme inlet conditions, repeated utilities, or unacceptable loss. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: The two streams have measurable inlet states, transfer capacities, and safe outlet ranges. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The two streams have measurable inlet states, transfer capacities, and safe outlet ranges.", "Under co-current or poorly staged flow, the streams approach one another near the inlet, local transfer stalls, downstream interface area is underused, and terminal targets require excessive area, extreme inlet conditions, repeated utilities, or unacceptable loss."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The two streams have measurable inlet states, transfer capacities, and safe outlet ranges."}, {"display_text": "A selective interface can permit the intended transfer while controlling leakage, contamination, or unwanted mixing.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Under co-current or poorly staged flow, the streams approach one another near the inlet, local transfer stalls, downstream interface area is underused, and terminal targets require excessive area, extreme inlet conditions, repeated utilities, or unacceptable loss. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: A selective interface can permit the intended transfer while controlling leakage, contamination, or unwanted mixing. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A selective interface can permit the intended transfer while controlling leakage, contamination, or unwanted mixing.", "Under co-current or poorly staged flow, the streams approach one another near the inlet, local transfer stalls, downstream interface area is underused, and terminal targets require excessive area, extreme inlet conditions, repeated utilities, or unacceptable loss."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "A selective interface can permit the intended transfer while controlling leakage, contamination, or unwanted mixing."}, {"display_text": "The gain from greater exchange effectiveness is material relative to routing, pressure-drop, control, area, maintenance, and safety costs.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "High exchange effectiveness favors long, intimate, well-ordered contact and small terminal approach differences. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The gain from greater exchange effectiveness is material relative to routing, pressure-drop, control, area, maintenance, and safety costs. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The gain from greater exchange effectiveness is material relative to routing, pressure-drop, control, area, maintenance, and safety costs.", "High exchange effectiveness favors long, intimate, well-ordered contact and small terminal approach differences."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "The gain from greater exchange effectiveness is material relative to routing, pressure-drop, control, area, maintenance, and safety costs."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 17, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-017", "ledger_sha256": "d63c7328913dbd0a29141fbb2c4088d0f5adc6bb0345e98cc3deef36881dd7de"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Countersettling Transfer Orientation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:countersettling_transfer_orientation", "slug": "countersettling_transfer_orientation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 1 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 1}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Ordinary transfer gives the unwanted companion the same destination-directed momentum as\nthe useful material. The transfer step therefore defeats the natural separation tendency\nand carries contamination into the destination.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A transfer gives an unwanted companion the same destination-directed momentum as useful material, defeating their natural separation tendency."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "This branch preserves the complete remedy-free diagnostic route; goals, feasibility clauses, gates, deployment constraints, and supporting context remain outside the DNF."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "EXT001-C028", "dnf": [["EXT001-U028-O1"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"obligation_id": "EXT001-U028-O1", "predicate": "Useful material and an unwanted companion acquire the same destination-directed momentum during transfer."}], "predicate": "Useful material and an unwanted companion acquire the same destination-directed momentum during transfer.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Useful material and an unwanted companion acquire the same destination-directed momentum during transfer.", "unit_id": "EXT001-U028"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"catalog_exhaustion": "CONDITION_LEVEL", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Useful material and an unwanted companion acquire the same destination-directed momentum during transfer.", "slug": "analogy"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Useful material and an unwanted companion acquire the same destination-directed momentum during transfer.", "slug": "custody_transfer"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Useful material and an unwanted companion acquire the same destination-directed momentum during transfer.", "slug": "sunk_cost_and_irreversible_commitment"}], "residual_id": "EXT001:countersettling_transfer_orientation:C01", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding."}}, "condition_id": "ext001_countersettling_transfer_orientation_a01", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: Useful material and an unwanted companion acquire the same destination-directed momentum during transfer.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Useful material and an unwanted companion acquire the same destination-directed momentum during transfer."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Useful material and an unwanted companion acquire the same destination-directed momentum during transfer.", "slug": "analogy"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Useful material and an unwanted companion acquire the same destination-directed momentum during transfer.", "slug": "custody_transfer"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Useful material and an unwanted companion acquire the same destination-directed momentum during transfer.", "slug": "sunk_cost_and_irreversible_commitment"}], "normalized_requirement": "Useful material and an unwanted companion acquire the same destination-directed momentum during transfer.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Useful material and an unwanted companion acquire the same destination-directed momentum during transfer.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The unwanted fraction has a predictable motion relative to the useful payload.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: The unwanted fraction has a predictable motion relative to the useful payload. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The unwanted fraction has a predictable motion relative to the useful payload.", "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "The unwanted fraction has a predictable motion relative to the useful payload."}, {"display_text": "The destination can be filled along a controlled orientation.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: The destination can be filled along a controlled orientation. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The destination can be filled along a controlled orientation.", "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "The destination can be filled along a controlled orientation."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"candidate_ledger_sha256": "96f72d2139077fd57bf795048ebef33b3fd574b20963170080ec916b5b3b92fe", "extension_id": "new-archetypes-extension-001", "ledger_id": "prime-production-v1.2-extension-001", "ledger_sha256": "9644520614744632d1d36da44b1acd77ce432852c6083eb871203521c166efce"}, "base_projection_sha256": "841e0c7f3cb8e8054475ad29a8a14745a416b4fc115559a44878b94292e673ec", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "ca09ed9fe1598ce7072755b530de5553f5ee0a7cd64ae82d9e4a4e2149a37788", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Coupled-Signal Decay Compensation Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:coupled_signal_decay_compensation_design", "slug": "coupled_signal_decay_compensation_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "An actor, record, audience, sensor, experiment, policy, or cognitive system relies on a bundle of signals whose joint interpretation is different from either component alone. Over time, one component fades, expires, washes out, is forgotten, loses salience, or becomes invalid faster than the other. The remaining component is still observable, so it is interpreted as if it still carried the original paired meaning, even though the missing component was what made that meaning safe, true, or bounded.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "An actor, record, audience, sensor, experiment, policy, or cognitive system relies on a bundle of signals whose joint interpretation is different from either component alone. Over time, one component fades, expires, washes out, is forgotten, loses salience, or becomes invalid faster than the other. The remaining component is still observable, so it is interpreted as if it still carried the original paired meaning, even though the missing component was what made that meaning safe, true, or bounded."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires two signals whose intended meaning is the joint, with each component conditioning the other.", "role_mapping": "Bundle -> coupled pair; meaning -> joint content.", "slug": "differential_decay", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b017_a15_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Meaning is bundle-dependent. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Meaning is bundle-dependent"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Differential Decay", "one_liner": "Two coupled signals decay at different rates, so the surviving component carries forward a meaning the original pair never intended — often with a sign flip.", "page_ref": "prime:differential_decay", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Bundle -> coupled pair; meaning -> joint content.", "slug": "differential_decay", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires two signals whose intended meaning is the joint, with each component conditioning the other."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Meaning is bundle-dependent.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's load-bearing fact is differential persistence of the paired components in one decay medium.", "role_mapping": "Components -> paired signals; rates -> differential decay.", "slug": "differential_decay", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b017_a15_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "An actor, record, audience, sensor, experiment, policy, or cognitive system relies on a bundle of signals whose joint interpretation is different from either component alone. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Components decay at different rates.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Components decay at different rates", "An actor, record, audience, sensor, experiment, policy, or cognitive system relies on a bundle of signals whose joint interpretation is different from either component alone."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Differential Decay", "one_liner": "Two coupled signals decay at different rates, so the surviving component carries forward a meaning the original pair never intended — often with a sign flip.", "page_ref": "prime:differential_decay", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Components -> paired signals; rates -> differential decay.", "slug": "differential_decay", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's load-bearing fact is differential persistence of the paired components in one decay medium."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Components decay at different rates.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The surviving component must carry meaning but can do so in a record, memory, or citation without remaining operationally actionable.", "slug": "differential_decay"}], "residual_id": "r:coupled_signal_decay_compensation_design:b017_a15_c3", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b017_a15_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The survivor remains actionable. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The survivor remains actionable"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The surviving component must carry meaning but can do so in a record, memory, or citation without remaining operationally actionable.", "slug": "differential_decay"}], "normalized_requirement": "The survivor remains actionable.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The survivor remains actionable.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The survivor must misrepresent the joint but the change need not reverse sign or valence.", "slug": "differential_decay"}], "residual_id": "r:coupled_signal_decay_compensation_design:b017_a15_c4", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b017_a15_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "If the long-lived component is allowed to survive independently, persistence becomes distortion; if everything is expired too aggressively, useful memory and accountability are lost. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The lost component changes the sign or valence.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The lost component changes the sign or valence", "If the long-lived component is allowed to survive independently, persistence becomes distortion; if everything is expired too aggressively, useful memory and accountability are lost."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The survivor must misrepresent the joint but the change need not reverse sign or valence.", "slug": "differential_decay"}], "normalized_requirement": "The lost component changes the sign or valence.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The lost component changes the sign or valence.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Differential persistence can arise passively in a decay medium without any explicit refresh or expiry processes to couple.", "slug": "differential_decay"}], "residual_id": "r:coupled_signal_decay_compensation_design:b017_a15_c5", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b017_a15_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Refresh or expiry is not coupled. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Refresh or expiry is not coupled"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Differential persistence can arise passively in a decay medium without any explicit refresh or expiry processes to couple.", "slug": "differential_decay"}], "normalized_requirement": "Refresh or expiry is not coupled.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Refresh or expiry is not coupled.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The surviving component carries a meaning the pair never intended with no visible substantive edit marking the vanished qualifier.", "role_mapping": "Observer -> recipient; missing context -> faster-decayed component; invisibility -> misleading survivor.", "slug": "differential_decay", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b017_a15_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Observers cannot see the missing context. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Observers cannot see the missing context"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Differential Decay", "one_liner": "Two coupled signals decay at different rates, so the surviving component carries forward a meaning the original pair never intended — often with a sign flip.", "page_ref": "prime:differential_decay", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Observer -> recipient; missing context -> faster-decayed component; invisibility -> misleading survivor.", "slug": "differential_decay", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The surviving component carries a meaning the pair never intended with no visible substantive edit marking the vanished qualifier."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Observers cannot see the missing context.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 17, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-017", "ledger_sha256": "d63c7328913dbd0a29141fbb2c4088d0f5adc6bb0345e98cc3deef36881dd7de"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Coupling Calibration", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:coupling_calibration", "slug": "coupling_calibration"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 5, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 5 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a mismatch between the needed interdependence and the actual form of interdependence. Too-tight coupling causes change amplification, blocked autonomy, high coordination cost, and large failure blast radius. Too-loose coupling causes incoherence, duplicated effort, unsafe divergence, or delayed coordination. Hidden coupling is often worse than either: it looks independent on paper but depends on tacit workarounds, shared state, or undocumented expectations.\n\nThis problem appears across software modules, teams, supply chains, institutions, curricula, operational workflows, and governance systems. In each case, the system needs connection, but the connection has the wrong strength, timing, direction, or boundary.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Subsystems depend on one another, but the current coupling intensity, timing, direction, or interface form creates fragility, propagation, latency, duplication, coordination failure, or hidden work."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Systemic-risk topology can exist at a probability or exposure level that a particular decision maker judges acceptable.", "slug": "systemic_risk"}], "residual_id": "r:coupling_calibration:b018_a01_c1", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b018_a01_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Propagation risk is too high. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Propagation risk is too high."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Systemic-risk topology can exist at a probability or exposure level that a particular decision maker judges acceptable.", "slug": "systemic_risk"}], "normalized_requirement": "Propagation risk is too high.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Propagation risk is too high.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "Parts are meaningfully interdependent and the observed failure is caused by a maladapted degree or form of coupling rather than by an unrelated local defect.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Parts are meaningfully interdependent and the observed failure is caused by a maladapted degree or form of coupling rather than by an unrelated local defect.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime is explicitly a coordination failure in which greater responder count reduces individual intervention and aggregate help.", "role_mapping": "Weak coordination -> falling response probability; insufficient help -> failure outcome.", "slug": "bystander_effect", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b018_a01_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It also fits when coordination is too weak: duplicate work, inconsistent standards, delayed alignment, or unresolved handoffs show that parts need a stronger or clearer connection. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Coordination is too weak.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Coordination is too weak.", "It also fits when coordination is too weak: duplicate work, inconsistent standards, delayed alignment, or unresolved handoffs show that parts need a stronger or clearer connection."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Bystander Effect", "one_liner": "A coordination failure in which each potential responder's chance of acting falls as the group grows, so more available helpers can paradoxically mean less help.", "page_ref": "prime:bystander_effect", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Weak coordination -> falling response probability; insufficient help -> failure outcome.", "slug": "bystander_effect", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime is explicitly a coordination failure in which greater responder count reduces individual intervention and aggregate help."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Coordination is too weak.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "Parts are meaningfully interdependent and the observed failure is caused by a maladapted degree or form of coupling rather than by an unrelated local defect.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Parts are meaningfully interdependent and the observed failure is caused by a maladapted degree or form of coupling rather than by an unrelated local defect.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Modularity can be implemented with explicit interfaces and therefore does not entail hidden interface assumptions.", "slug": "modularity"}], "residual_id": "r:coupling_calibration:b018_a01_c3", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b018_a01_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Interfaces are implicit. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Interfaces are implicit."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Modularity can be implemented with explicit interfaces and therefore does not entail hidden interface assumptions.", "slug": "modularity"}], "normalized_requirement": "Interfaces are implicit.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Interfaces are implicit.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "Parts are meaningfully interdependent and the observed failure is caused by a maladapted degree or form of coupling rather than by an unrelated local defect.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Parts are meaningfully interdependent and the observed failure is caused by a maladapted degree or form of coupling rather than by an unrelated local defect.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime definitionally places a system action cycle out of phase with the environmental timescale it must serve.", "role_mapping": "Timing -> action and environment clocks; mismatch -> out-of-phase rate ratio.", "slug": "tempo_mismatch", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime requires a reference signal to change faster than the closed loop can track, a precise timing mismatch.", "role_mapping": "Timing -> reference cadence and loop bandwidth; mismatch -> cadence exceeds bandwidth.", "slug": "reference_cadence_exceeds_tracking_bandwidth", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b018_a01_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Timing is mismatched. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Timing is mismatched."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Tempo Mismatch", "one_liner": "A system's pace of action is out of phase with the timescale of the environment it must respond to, so correct decisions degrade outcomes by arriving against a world that has already moved on (or one not yet ready to absorb them).", "page_ref": "prime:tempo_mismatch", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Timing -> action and environment clocks; mismatch -> out-of-phase rate ratio.", "slug": "tempo_mismatch", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime definitionally places a system action cycle out of phase with the environmental timescale it must serve."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Reference Cadence Exceeds Tracking Bandwidth", "one_liner": "When the signal a closed loop must track changes faster than the loop's bandwidth, persistent error follows that no amount of executor effort can close.", "page_ref": "prime:reference_cadence_exceeds_tracking_bandwidth", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Timing -> reference cadence and loop bandwidth; mismatch -> cadence exceeds bandwidth.", "slug": "reference_cadence_exceeds_tracking_bandwidth", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a reference signal to change faster than the closed loop can track, a precise timing mismatch."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Timing is mismatched.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "Parts are meaningfully interdependent and the observed failure is caused by a maladapted degree or form of coupling rather than by an unrelated local defect.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Parts are meaningfully interdependent and the observed failure is caused by a maladapted degree or form of coupling rather than by an unrelated local defect.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B5", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A directed dependency can remain stable in direction for its entire lifetime.", "slug": "dependency"}], "residual_id": "r:coupling_calibration:b018_a01_c5", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b018_a01_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Dependency direction is unstable. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Dependency direction is unstable."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A directed dependency can remain stable in direction for its entire lifetime.", "slug": "dependency"}], "normalized_requirement": "Dependency direction is unstable.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Dependency direction is unstable.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "Parts are meaningfully interdependent and the observed failure is caused by a maladapted degree or form of coupling rather than by an unrelated local defect.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Parts are meaningfully interdependent and the observed failure is caused by a maladapted degree or form of coupling rather than by an unrelated local defect.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 5", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "DISJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 18, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-018", "ledger_sha256": "0d794f02665a559f09b3c1bfed372707fc938160005cbbe18fe35518203d143a"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Coupling Latency and Time-Delay Effects", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:coupling_latency_and_time_delay_effects", "slug": "coupling_latency_and_time_delay_effects"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 5, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 1, "statement": "3 of 8 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 5 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 8}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Two or more coupled units depend on each other through signals, decisions, handoffs, resource flows, commands, measurements, approvals, or feedback. The interaction contains nontrivial delay between a change in one unit and a usable response in another. Because the delay is hidden, underestimated, or mismatched to the system’s time constants, responses are based on stale state and can destabilize the coupled system.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Two or more coupled units depend on each other through signals, decisions, handoffs, resource flows, commands, measurements, approvals, or feedback. The interaction contains nontrivial delay between a change in one unit and a usable response in another. Because the delay is hidden, underestimated, or mismatched to the system’s time constants, responses are based on stale state and can destabilize the coupled system."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a stimulus to traverse an irreducible interval before producing its response at the output.", "role_mapping": "Listed item -> input signal; chain transit -> latency interval; action -> output response.", "slug": "latency", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b018_a02_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Two or more coupled units depend on each other through signals, decisions, handoffs, resource flows, commands, measurements, approvals, or feedback. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Signals, measurements, orders, approvals, warnings, commands, or handoffs travel through a chain before they affect action.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Signals, measurements, orders, approvals, warnings, commands, or handoffs travel through a chain before they affect action.", "Two or more coupled units depend on each other through signals, decisions, handoffs, resource flows, commands, measurements, approvals, or feedback."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Latency", "one_liner": "The irreducible delay between an input and the system's response.", "page_ref": "prime:latency", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Listed item -> input signal; chain transit -> latency interval; action -> output response.", "slug": "latency", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a stimulus to traverse an irreducible interval before producing its response at the output."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Signals, measurements, orders, approvals, warnings, commands, or handoffs travel through a chain before they affect action.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires the environment to move on, or not yet be ready, during the system's action cycle so otherwise correct action arrives against a changed state.", "role_mapping": "Affected system -> environment; observation-to-action time -> action cycle; material change -> clock mismatch.", "slug": "tempo_mismatch", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b018_a02_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The affected system changes materially during the time required to observe, decide, transmit, or act. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The affected system changes materially during the time required to observe, decide, transmit, or act."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Tempo Mismatch", "one_liner": "A system's pace of action is out of phase with the timescale of the environment it must respond to, so correct decisions degrade outcomes by arriving against a world that has already moved on (or one not yet ready to absorb them).", "page_ref": "prime:tempo_mismatch", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Affected system -> environment; observation-to-action time -> action cycle; material change -> clock mismatch.", "slug": "tempo_mismatch", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires the environment to move on, or not yet be ready, during the system's action cycle so otherwise correct action arrives against a changed state."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The affected system changes materially during the time required to observe, decide, transmit, or act.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P021-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a correction to be the response whose arrival is evaluated.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A correction is the arriving targeted response.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a resource adjustment to be the response whose arrival is evaluated.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A resource adjustment is the arriving targeted response.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must link each response to the condition it is intended to correct or adjust.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The response targets a particular condition.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require recurrence and cannot be satisfied by one delayed response.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The stale-arrival pattern occurs repeatedly.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail that target-state change precedes arrival, making the response based on an earlier target state.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The response arrives after its target condition has changed.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "Corrections or resource adjustments repeatedly arrive after their target condition has changed.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A targeted response repeatedly arrives only after its target state has changed.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P021-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Latency can be short relative to target-state change and need not make corrections stale or recurrent.", "slug": "latency"}], "residual_id": "r:coupling_latency_and_time_delay_effects:b018_a02_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b018_a02_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Corrections or resource adjustments repeatedly arrive after the condition they targeted has changed. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Corrections or resource adjustments repeatedly arrive after the condition they targeted has changed."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Latency can be short relative to target-state change and need not make corrections stale or recurrent.", "slug": "latency"}], "normalized_requirement": "Corrections or resource adjustments repeatedly arrive after the condition they targeted has changed.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Corrections or resource adjustments repeatedly arrive after the condition they targeted has changed.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A response-propagation race compares two processes on a graph but does not require strong coupling or variable response time.", "slug": "response_vs_propagation_race"}], "residual_id": "r:coupling_latency_and_time_delay_effects:b018_a02_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b018_a02_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The interaction contains nontrivial delay between a change in one unit and a usable response in another. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The same interaction includes strong coupling and long, variable, or poorly bounded response times.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The same interaction includes strong coupling and long, variable, or poorly bounded response times.", "The interaction contains nontrivial delay between a change in one unit and a usable response in another."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A response-propagation race compares two processes on a graph but does not require strong coupling or variable response time.", "slug": "response_vs_propagation_race"}], "normalized_requirement": "The same interaction includes strong coupling and long, variable, or poorly bounded response times.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The same interaction includes strong coupling and long, variable, or poorly bounded response times.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's defining relation is a system action cadence differing from the environmental timescale it must track.", "role_mapping": "Listed cadence -> system clock; pace of events -> environment clock; differs -> mismatch.", "slug": "tempo_mismatch", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b018_a02_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Human decision cadence, committee review, procurement, software propagation, sensor update rate, or logistics lead time differs from the pace of events. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Human decision cadence, committee review, procurement, software propagation, sensor update rate, or logistics lead time differs from the pace of events."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Tempo Mismatch", "one_liner": "A system's pace of action is out of phase with the timescale of the environment it must respond to, so correct decisions degrade outcomes by arriving against a world that has already moved on (or one not yet ready to absorb them).", "page_ref": "prime:tempo_mismatch", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Listed cadence -> system clock; pace of events -> environment clock; differs -> mismatch.", "slug": "tempo_mismatch", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's defining relation is a system action cadence differing from the environmental timescale it must track."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Human decision cadence, committee review, procurement, software propagation, sensor update rate, or logistics lead time differs from the pace of events.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A response-propagation race compares two processes on a graph but does not require strong coupling or variable response time.", "slug": "response_vs_propagation_race"}], "residual_id": "r:coupling_latency_and_time_delay_effects:b018_a02_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b018_a02_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The interaction contains nontrivial delay between a change in one unit and a usable response in another. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The same interaction includes strong coupling and long, variable, or poorly bounded response times.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The same interaction includes strong coupling and long, variable, or poorly bounded response times.", "The interaction contains nontrivial delay between a change in one unit and a usable response in another."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A response-propagation race compares two processes on a graph but does not require strong coupling or variable response time.", "slug": "response_vs_propagation_race"}], "normalized_requirement": "The same interaction includes strong coupling and long, variable, or poorly bounded response times.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The same interaction includes strong coupling and long, variable, or poorly bounded response times.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime also covers mechanical, electrical, biological, and other oscillators outside the condition's enumerated operational systems.", "slug": "oscillation"}], "residual_id": "r:coupling_latency_and_time_delay_effects:b018_a02_c6", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b018_a02_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A feedback loop, workflow, supply chain, service queue, trading system, or policy cycle shows oscillation, overshoot, pileups, or recurring catch-up actions. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A feedback loop, workflow, supply chain, service queue, trading system, or policy cycle shows oscillation, overshoot, pileups, or recurring catch-up actions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime also covers mechanical, electrical, biological, and other oscillators outside the condition's enumerated operational systems.", "slug": "oscillation"}], "normalized_requirement": "A feedback loop, workflow, supply chain, service queue, trading system, or policy cycle shows oscillation, overshoot, pileups, or recurring catch-up actions.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A feedback loop, workflow, supply chain, service queue, trading system, or policy cycle shows oscillation, overshoot, pileups, or recurring catch-up actions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A response-propagation race compares two processes on a graph but does not require strong coupling or variable response time.", "slug": "response_vs_propagation_race"}], "residual_id": "r:coupling_latency_and_time_delay_effects:b018_a02_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b018_a02_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The interaction contains nontrivial delay between a change in one unit and a usable response in another. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The same interaction includes strong coupling and long, variable, or poorly bounded response times.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The same interaction includes strong coupling and long, variable, or poorly bounded response times.", "The interaction contains nontrivial delay between a change in one unit and a usable response in another."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A response-propagation race compares two processes on a graph but does not require strong coupling or variable response time.", "slug": "response_vs_propagation_race"}], "normalized_requirement": "The same interaction includes strong coupling and long, variable, or poorly bounded response times.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The same interaction includes strong coupling and long, variable, or poorly bounded response times.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P021-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve stakeholders or equivalent participants as the belief holders.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Stakeholders are the holders of the coordination assumption.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail a belief or assumption of real-time coordination, not merely a preference for it.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The stakeholders assume that coordination is real-time.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must compare stakeholder belief with actual coordination and keep the coordination referent aligned.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The assumption is contrasted with the actual mode of the same coordination process.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires usable coordination to occur after a nontrivial delay rather than in real time.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Actual coordination is delayed.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires participants or units to coordinate without synchronized real-time interaction.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Actual coordination is asynchronous.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires coordination updates or actions to be accumulated and processed in batches rather than continuously in real time.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "Actual coordination is batched.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "Stakeholders assume real-time coordination while actual coordination is delayed, asynchronous, or batched.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Stakeholders' real-time coordination assumption conflicts with the actual temporal coordination mode.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P021-C15-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P021-C15", "dnf": [], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [], "predicate": "Stakeholders assume real-time coordination while actual coordination is lossy.", "resolution": "SOURCE_DEFECT", "semantic_scope": "SOURCE_DEFECT", "structural_head": "Lossy coordination is juxtaposed with a real-time assumption without an entailed timing conflict.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P021-C15-U2"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Latency entails delay but not a stakeholder belief that coordination is real-time or any contrast with that belief.", "slug": "latency"}], "residual_id": "r:coupling_latency_and_time_delay_effects:b018_a02_c7", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b018_a02_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Because the delay is hidden, underestimated, or mismatched to the system’s time constants, responses are based on stale state and can destabilize the coupled system. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Stakeholders assume real-time coordination while actual coordination is delayed, asynchronous, batched, or lossy.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders assume real-time coordination while actual coordination is delayed, asynchronous, batched, or lossy.", "Because the delay is hidden, underestimated, or mismatched to the system’s time constants, responses are based on stale state and can destabilize the coupled system."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "SOURCE_REVIEW_REQUIRED", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 1, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Latency entails delay but not a stakeholder belief that coordination is real-time or any contrast with that belief.", "slug": "latency"}], "normalized_requirement": "Stakeholders assume real-time coordination while actual coordination is delayed, asynchronous, batched, or lossy.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "SOURCE_REVIEW_REQUIRED", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later candidate-blind atomization found that the source wording lacks a relation required by its diagnostic reading, so this is a source-repair issue rather than evidence of a missing abstraction."}, "predicate": "Stakeholders assume real-time coordination while actual coordination is delayed, asynchronous, batched, or lossy.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B5", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A response-propagation race compares two processes on a graph but does not require strong coupling or variable response time.", "slug": "response_vs_propagation_race"}], "residual_id": "r:coupling_latency_and_time_delay_effects:b018_a02_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b018_a02_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The interaction contains nontrivial delay between a change in one unit and a usable response in another. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The same interaction includes strong coupling and long, variable, or poorly bounded response times.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The same interaction includes strong coupling and long, variable, or poorly bounded response times.", "The interaction contains nontrivial delay between a change in one unit and a usable response in another."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A response-propagation race compares two processes on a graph but does not require strong coupling or variable response time.", "slug": "response_vs_propagation_race"}], "normalized_requirement": "The same interaction includes strong coupling and long, variable, or poorly bounded response times.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The same interaction includes strong coupling and long, variable, or poorly bounded response times.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P022-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve two coupled subsystems with materially different response speeds.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The coupled system contains a fast subsystem and a slow subsystem.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail coupling between the differently paced subsystems, not mere co-presence.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The fast and slow subsystems are coupled.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require the absence of buffering rather than merely allowing a small buffer.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "No buffer mediates the coupling.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require prediction to be absent from the coupling.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "No predictive mechanism compensates for the pace mismatch.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require rate limiting to be absent.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "No rate limit constrains the coupling.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require escalation thresholds to be absent.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "No escalation threshold governs the coupling.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "A fast subsystem and a slow subsystem are coupled without buffers, prediction, rate limits, or escalation thresholds.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Fast and slow subsystems are coupled while all listed temporal safeguards are absent.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P022-C01-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Coupling can connect same-speed subsystems and can include buffers, prediction, rate limits, or escalation thresholds.", "slug": "coupling"}], "residual_id": "r:coupling_latency_and_time_delay_effects:b018_a02_c8", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b018_a02_c8", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A fast subsystem and a slow subsystem are coupled without buffers, prediction, rate limits, or escalation thresholds. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A fast subsystem and a slow subsystem are coupled without buffers, prediction, rate limits, or escalation thresholds."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Coupling can connect same-speed subsystems and can include buffers, prediction, rate limits, or escalation thresholds.", "slug": "coupling"}], "normalized_requirement": "A fast subsystem and a slow subsystem are coupled without buffers, prediction, rate limits, or escalation thresholds.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A fast subsystem and a slow subsystem are coupled without buffers, prediction, rate limits, or escalation thresholds.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [8], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 5", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 18, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-018", "ledger_sha256": "0d794f02665a559f09b3c1bfed372707fc938160005cbbe18fe35518203d143a"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Coverage Probability Calibration", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:coverage_probability_calibration", "slug": "coverage_probability_calibration"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 4, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 4 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "An uncertainty interval is reported with a nominal coverage claim, but the procedure that generated it may not attain that coverage in the finite sample, subgroup, tail, model-selection path, dependence structure, missingness pattern, or operating regime where the result will be used. The visible output looks precise and disciplined, while its containment guarantee is untested or false.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "An uncertainty interval is reported with a nominal coverage claim, but the procedure that generated it may not attain that coverage in the finite sample, subgroup, tail, model-selection path, dependence structure, missingness pattern, or operating regime where the result will be used. The visible output looks precise and disciplined, while its containment guarantee is untested or false."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A confidence interval can be reported for descriptive inference without supporting a decision.", "slug": "confidence_intervals"}], "residual_id": "r:coverage_probability_calibration:b018_a03_c1", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b018_a03_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Intervals must be narrow enough to be useful, but credible enough to be honest. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A confidence interval, uncertainty interval, prediction interval, credible-looking range, or error band is used to support decisions.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A confidence interval, uncertainty interval, prediction interval, credible-looking range, or error band is used to support decisions.", "Intervals must be narrow enough to be useful, but credible enough to be honest."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A confidence interval can be reported for descriptive inference without supporting a decision.", "slug": "confidence_intervals"}], "normalized_requirement": "A confidence interval, uncertainty interval, prediction interval, credible-looking range, or error band is used to support decisions.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A confidence interval, uncertainty interval, prediction interval, credible-looking range, or error band is used to support decisions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a probability model and sampling design under which its construction has long-run nominal coverage.", "role_mapping": "Interval procedure -> construction rule; listed assumptions -> model and sampling design.", "slug": "confidence_intervals", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b018_a03_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "An uncertainty interval is reported with a nominal coverage claim, but the procedure that generated it may not attain that coverage in the finite sample, subgroup, tail, model-selection path, dependence structure, missingness pattern, or operating regime where the result will be used. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The interval procedure relies on asymptotic, normality, independence, stationarity, representative-sampling, or correct-model assumptions.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The interval procedure relies on asymptotic, normality, independence, stationarity, representative-sampling, or correct-model assumptions.", "An uncertainty interval is reported with a nominal coverage claim, but the procedure that generated it may not attain that coverage in the finite sample, subgroup, tail, model-selection path, dependence structure, missingness pattern, or operating regime where the result will be used."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Confidence Intervals", "one_liner": "Range of plausible values.", "page_ref": "prime:confidence_intervals", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Interval procedure -> construction rule; listed assumptions -> model and sampling design.", "slug": "confidence_intervals", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a probability model and sampling design under which its construction has long-run nominal coverage."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The interval procedure relies on asymptotic, normality, independence, stationarity, representative-sampling, or correct-model assumptions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime definitionally exhibits slow tail decay and tail-dominated aggregates, satisfying the condition's heavy-tailed alternative.", "role_mapping": "Distribution -> sampling regime; heavy tail -> listed failure regime.", "slug": "heavy_tailed_distributions", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b018_a03_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "An uncertainty interval is reported with a nominal coverage claim, but the procedure that generated it may not attain that coverage in the finite sample, subgroup, tail, model-selection path, dependence structure, missingness pattern, or operating regime where the result will be used. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Sample sizes are small, outcomes are rare, distributions are skewed or heavy-tailed, or measurement noise is heteroscedastic.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Sample sizes are small, outcomes are rare, distributions are skewed or heavy-tailed, or measurement noise is heteroscedastic.", "An uncertainty interval is reported with a nominal coverage claim, but the procedure that generated it may not attain that coverage in the finite sample, subgroup, tail, model-selection path, dependence structure, missingness pattern, or operating regime where the result will be used."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Heavy-Tailed Distributions", "one_liner": "Distributions where rare, extreme events carry most of the weight.", "page_ref": "prime:heavy_tailed_distributions", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Distribution -> sampling regime; heavy tail -> listed failure regime.", "slug": "heavy_tailed_distributions", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime definitionally exhibits slow tail decay and tail-dominated aggregates, satisfying the condition's heavy-tailed alternative."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Sample sizes are small, outcomes are rare, distributions are skewed or heavy-tailed, or measurement noise is heteroscedastic.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A confidence interval can be reported for descriptive inference without supporting a decision.", "slug": "confidence_intervals"}], "residual_id": "r:coverage_probability_calibration:b018_a03_c1", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b018_a03_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Intervals must be narrow enough to be useful, but credible enough to be honest. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A confidence interval, uncertainty interval, prediction interval, credible-looking range, or error band is used to support decisions.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A confidence interval, uncertainty interval, prediction interval, credible-looking range, or error band is used to support decisions.", "Intervals must be narrow enough to be useful, but credible enough to be honest."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A confidence interval can be reported for descriptive inference without supporting a decision.", "slug": "confidence_intervals"}], "normalized_requirement": "A confidence interval, uncertainty interval, prediction interval, credible-looking range, or error band is used to support decisions.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A confidence interval, uncertainty interval, prediction interval, credible-looking range, or error band is used to support decisions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a probability model and sampling design under which its construction has long-run nominal coverage.", "role_mapping": "Interval procedure -> construction rule; listed assumptions -> model and sampling design.", "slug": "confidence_intervals", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b018_a03_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "An uncertainty interval is reported with a nominal coverage claim, but the procedure that generated it may not attain that coverage in the finite sample, subgroup, tail, model-selection path, dependence structure, missingness pattern, or operating regime where the result will be used. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The interval procedure relies on asymptotic, normality, independence, stationarity, representative-sampling, or correct-model assumptions.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The interval procedure relies on asymptotic, normality, independence, stationarity, representative-sampling, or correct-model assumptions.", "An uncertainty interval is reported with a nominal coverage claim, but the procedure that generated it may not attain that coverage in the finite sample, subgroup, tail, model-selection path, dependence structure, missingness pattern, or operating regime where the result will be used."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Confidence Intervals", "one_liner": "Range of plausible values.", "page_ref": "prime:confidence_intervals", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Interval procedure -> construction rule; listed assumptions -> model and sampling design.", "slug": "confidence_intervals", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a probability model and sampling design under which its construction has long-run nominal coverage."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The interval procedure relies on asymptotic, normality, independence, stationarity, representative-sampling, or correct-model assumptions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P022-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must make reported intervals, not point estimates or hypotheses alone, the focal outputs.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Intervals are the reported outputs.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the post-procedure ordering between analysis choice and interval reporting.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The intervals are reported after the analysis path has used the listed procedure.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires model selection before the intervals are reported.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The preceding procedure includes model selection.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires multiplicity from multiple comparisons before reporting.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The preceding procedure includes multiple comparisons.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires data-dependent optional stopping before reporting.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The preceding procedure includes optional stopping.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires subgroup search before reporting.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The preceding procedure includes subgroup searching.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires an adaptive experiment before reporting.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The preceding procedure includes adaptive experimentation.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Intervals are reported after model selection, multiple comparisons, optional stopping, subgroup searching, or adaptive experimentation.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Reported intervals follow at least one listed adaptive or multiplicity-inducing analysis choice.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P022-C02-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Selection on noisy estimates need not report an interval or involve model selection, multiplicity, optional stopping, subgroup search, or adaptive experimentation.", "slug": "selection_on_noisy_estimates"}], "residual_id": "r:coverage_probability_calibration:b018_a03_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b018_a03_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "An uncertainty interval is reported with a nominal coverage claim, but the procedure that generated it may not attain that coverage in the finite sample, subgroup, tail, model-selection path, dependence structure, missingness pattern, or operating regime where the result will be used. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Intervals are reported after model selection, multiple comparisons, optional stopping, subgroup searching, or adaptive experimentation.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Intervals are reported after model selection, multiple comparisons, optional stopping, subgroup searching, or adaptive experimentation.", "An uncertainty interval is reported with a nominal coverage claim, but the procedure that generated it may not attain that coverage in the finite sample, subgroup, tail, model-selection path, dependence structure, missingness pattern, or operating regime where the result will be used."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Selection on noisy estimates need not report an interval or involve model selection, multiplicity, optional stopping, subgroup search, or adaptive experimentation.", "slug": "selection_on_noisy_estimates"}], "normalized_requirement": "Intervals are reported after model selection, multiple comparisons, optional stopping, subgroup searching, or adaptive experimentation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Intervals are reported after model selection, multiple comparisons, optional stopping, subgroup searching, or adaptive experimentation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A confidence interval can be reported for descriptive inference without supporting a decision.", "slug": "confidence_intervals"}], "residual_id": "r:coverage_probability_calibration:b018_a03_c1", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b018_a03_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Intervals must be narrow enough to be useful, but credible enough to be honest. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A confidence interval, uncertainty interval, prediction interval, credible-looking range, or error band is used to support decisions.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A confidence interval, uncertainty interval, prediction interval, credible-looking range, or error band is used to support decisions.", "Intervals must be narrow enough to be useful, but credible enough to be honest."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A confidence interval can be reported for descriptive inference without supporting a decision.", "slug": "confidence_intervals"}], "normalized_requirement": "A confidence interval, uncertainty interval, prediction interval, credible-looking range, or error band is used to support decisions.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A confidence interval, uncertainty interval, prediction interval, credible-looking range, or error band is used to support decisions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a probability model and sampling design under which its construction has long-run nominal coverage.", "role_mapping": "Interval procedure -> construction rule; listed assumptions -> model and sampling design.", "slug": "confidence_intervals", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b018_a03_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "An uncertainty interval is reported with a nominal coverage claim, but the procedure that generated it may not attain that coverage in the finite sample, subgroup, tail, model-selection path, dependence structure, missingness pattern, or operating regime where the result will be used. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The interval procedure relies on asymptotic, normality, independence, stationarity, representative-sampling, or correct-model assumptions.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The interval procedure relies on asymptotic, normality, independence, stationarity, representative-sampling, or correct-model assumptions.", "An uncertainty interval is reported with a nominal coverage claim, but the procedure that generated it may not attain that coverage in the finite sample, subgroup, tail, model-selection path, dependence structure, missingness pattern, or operating regime where the result will be used."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Confidence Intervals", "one_liner": "Range of plausible values.", "page_ref": "prime:confidence_intervals", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Interval procedure -> construction rule; listed assumptions -> model and sampling design.", "slug": "confidence_intervals", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a probability model and sampling design under which its construction has long-run nominal coverage."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The interval procedure relies on asymptotic, normality, independence, stationarity, representative-sampling, or correct-model assumptions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P022-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must concern achieved or realized interval coverage, not an unrelated performance quantity.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Interval coverage is the quantity being compared.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the source possibility modality expressed by “may.”", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Coverage is permitted to differ rather than asserted to differ in every case.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail possible cross-group, cross-setting, cross-period, cross-stratum, cross-state, or structurally equivalent coverage heterogeneity.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Coverage may vary across a grouping or operating dimension.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Coverage may differ across demographic groups, sites, products, time periods, risk strata, or tail states.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Interval coverage may vary across a grouping or operating dimension.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P022-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Aggregate-subgroup reversal does not require interval coverage or heterogeneous coverage rates.", "slug": "simpson_yule_effect"}], "residual_id": "r:coverage_probability_calibration:b018_a03_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b018_a03_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "An uncertainty interval is reported with a nominal coverage claim, but the procedure that generated it may not attain that coverage in the finite sample, subgroup, tail, model-selection path, dependence structure, missingness pattern, or operating regime where the result will be used. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Coverage may differ across demographic groups, sites, products, time periods, risk strata, or tail states.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Coverage may differ across demographic groups, sites, products, time periods, risk strata, or tail states.", "An uncertainty interval is reported with a nominal coverage claim, but the procedure that generated it may not attain that coverage in the finite sample, subgroup, tail, model-selection path, dependence structure, missingness pattern, or operating regime where the result will be used."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Aggregate-subgroup reversal does not require interval coverage or heterogeneous coverage rates.", "slug": "simpson_yule_effect"}], "normalized_requirement": "Coverage may differ across demographic groups, sites, products, time periods, risk strata, or tail states.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Coverage may differ across demographic groups, sites, products, time periods, risk strata, or tail states.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A confidence interval can be reported for descriptive inference without supporting a decision.", "slug": "confidence_intervals"}], "residual_id": "r:coverage_probability_calibration:b018_a03_c1", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b018_a03_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Intervals must be narrow enough to be useful, but credible enough to be honest. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A confidence interval, uncertainty interval, prediction interval, credible-looking range, or error band is used to support decisions.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A confidence interval, uncertainty interval, prediction interval, credible-looking range, or error band is used to support decisions.", "Intervals must be narrow enough to be useful, but credible enough to be honest."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A confidence interval can be reported for descriptive inference without supporting a decision.", "slug": "confidence_intervals"}], "normalized_requirement": "A confidence interval, uncertainty interval, prediction interval, credible-looking range, or error band is used to support decisions.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A confidence interval, uncertainty interval, prediction interval, credible-looking range, or error band is used to support decisions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a probability model and sampling design under which its construction has long-run nominal coverage.", "role_mapping": "Interval procedure -> construction rule; listed assumptions -> model and sampling design.", "slug": "confidence_intervals", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b018_a03_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "An uncertainty interval is reported with a nominal coverage claim, but the procedure that generated it may not attain that coverage in the finite sample, subgroup, tail, model-selection path, dependence structure, missingness pattern, or operating regime where the result will be used. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The interval procedure relies on asymptotic, normality, independence, stationarity, representative-sampling, or correct-model assumptions.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The interval procedure relies on asymptotic, normality, independence, stationarity, representative-sampling, or correct-model assumptions.", "An uncertainty interval is reported with a nominal coverage claim, but the procedure that generated it may not attain that coverage in the finite sample, subgroup, tail, model-selection path, dependence structure, missingness pattern, or operating regime where the result will be used."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Confidence Intervals", "one_liner": "Range of plausible values.", "page_ref": "prime:confidence_intervals", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Interval procedure -> construction rule; listed assumptions -> model and sampling design.", "slug": "confidence_intervals", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a probability model and sampling design under which its construction has long-run nominal coverage."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The interval procedure relies on asymptotic, normality, independence, stationarity, representative-sampling, or correct-model assumptions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P022-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O4", "O6", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O4", "O7", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O5", "O6", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O5", "O7", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must make an interval-producing method, not a generic rule, the transported object.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An interval method is the transported object.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail cross-setting transport of the same method.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The interval method is transported from its established setting into another setting.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This source-type branch requires a published interval method.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The transported interval method is published.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This source-type branch requires a benchmark interval method.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The transported interval method is a benchmark method.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This source-type branch requires a software-default interval method.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The transported interval method is a software default.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This destination branch requires transport into a new substantive domain.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The destination is a new domain.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This destination branch requires transport into a new data-generating or operating regime.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The destination is a new data regime.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the actuality expressed by ‘is being transported.’", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The transport is occurring rather than merely proposed as possible.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "A published, benchmark, or software-default interval method is being transported into a new domain or data regime.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A published, benchmark, or software-default interval method is transported into a new domain or data regime.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P022-C04-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A calibrated rule can drift within one domain and need not be an interval method transported to a new regime.", "slug": "calibrated_rule_vs_moving_world"}], "residual_id": "r:coverage_probability_calibration:b018_a03_c8", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b018_a03_c8", "explanation": {"paragraph": "An uncertainty interval is reported with a nominal coverage claim, but the procedure that generated it may not attain that coverage in the finite sample, subgroup, tail, model-selection path, dependence structure, missingness pattern, or operating regime where the result will be used. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A published, benchmark, or software-default interval method is being transported into a new domain or data regime.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A published, benchmark, or software-default interval method is being transported into a new domain or data regime.", "An uncertainty interval is reported with a nominal coverage claim, but the procedure that generated it may not attain that coverage in the finite sample, subgroup, tail, model-selection path, dependence structure, missingness pattern, or operating regime where the result will be used."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A calibrated rule can drift within one domain and need not be an interval method transported to a new regime.", "slug": "calibrated_rule_vs_moving_world"}], "normalized_requirement": "A published, benchmark, or software-default interval method is being transported into a new domain or data regime.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A published, benchmark, or software-default interval method is being transported into a new domain or data regime.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [8], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Decision-makers interpret interval width as decision certainty, regulatory assurance, safety margin, or performance superiority.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Decision-makers interpret interval width as decision certainty, regulatory assurance, safety margin, or performance superiority. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Decision-makers interpret interval width as decision certainty, regulatory assurance, safety margin, or performance superiority."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Decision-makers interpret interval width as decision certainty, regulatory assurance, safety margin, or performance superiority."}, {"display_text": "The same interval procedure will be reused many times, making repeated undercoverage consequential.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "An uncertainty interval is reported with a nominal coverage claim, but the procedure that generated it may not attain that coverage in the finite sample, subgroup, tail, model-selection path, dependence structure, missingness pattern, or operating regime where the result will be used. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The same interval procedure will be reused many times, making repeated undercoverage consequential. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The same interval procedure will be reused many times, making repeated undercoverage consequential.", "An uncertainty interval is reported with a nominal coverage claim, but the procedure that generated it may not attain that coverage in the finite sample, subgroup, tail, model-selection path, dependence structure, missingness pattern, or operating regime where the result will be used."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "The same interval procedure will be reused many times, making repeated undercoverage consequential."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 18, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-018", "ledger_sha256": "0d794f02665a559f09b3c1bfed372707fc938160005cbbe18fe35518203d143a"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Creative Destruction Management", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:creative_destruction_management", "slug": "creative_destruction_management"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 5 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a renewal trap. A superior replacement exists or is emerging, but the incumbent remains embedded in the operating environment. The old structure may be obsolete, but it is not irrelevant. It carries live dependencies, habits, data, legitimacy, tacit knowledge, and political or economic claims.\n\nIf the old structure is preserved indefinitely, renewal stalls and legacy drag grows. If it is removed abruptly, the system can suffer outage, backlash, knowledge loss, stranded users, or unfair displacement. The problem is not only technical migration. It is the tension between rupture and continuity.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A new structure can create value by replacing an old one, but the incumbent remains entangled with users, workflows, records, skills, assets, norms, contracts, and political interests. If replacement is unmanaged, the system can suffer abrupt service loss, stranded stakeholders, legitimacy failure, indefinite dual support, or backlash that blocks renewal."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Innovation-driven replacement entails obsolescence but not that the obsolescence is already visible to the relevant observers.", "slug": "creative_destruction"}], "residual_id": "r:creative_destruction_management:b018_a04_c1", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b018_a04_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Incumbent obsolescence is visible. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["incumbent_obsolescence_is_visible"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Innovation-driven replacement entails obsolescence but not that the obsolescence is already visible to the relevant observers.", "slug": "creative_destruction"}], "normalized_requirement": "Incumbent obsolescence is visible.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Incumbent obsolescence is visible.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's replacement is an innovation or quality improvement whose value drives reallocation away from the incumbent.", "role_mapping": "Replacement -> innovating entrant/configuration; material value -> productive advantage.", "slug": "creative_destruction", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b018_a04_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Replacement has material value. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["replacement_has_material_value"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Creative Destruction", "one_liner": "Replacement through innovation.", "page_ref": "prime:creative_destruction", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Replacement -> innovating entrant/configuration; material value -> productive advantage.", "slug": "creative_destruction", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's replacement is an innovation or quality improvement whose value drives reallocation away from the incumbent."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The replacement has material value.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A dependency can concern any active element and does not necessarily remain attached to an obsolete incumbent during replacement.", "slug": "dependency"}], "residual_id": "r:creative_destruction_management:b018_a04_c3", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b018_a04_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Live dependencies remain. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["live_dependencies_remain"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A dependency can concern any active element and does not necessarily remain attached to an obsolete incumbent during replacement.", "slug": "dependency"}], "normalized_requirement": "Live dependencies remain.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Live dependencies remain.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Switching cost can exist without indefinite parallel support, and dual support can be inexpensive.", "slug": "switching_cost"}], "residual_id": "r:creative_destruction_management:b018_a04_c4", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b018_a04_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Indefinite dual support is costly. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["indefinite_dual_support_is_costly"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Switching cost can exist without indefinite parallel support, and dual support can be inexpensive.", "slug": "switching_cost"}], "normalized_requirement": "Indefinite dual support is costly.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Indefinite dual support is costly.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Inherited substrate risk can persist without a cutover, and a cutover can be safe despite inherited conditions.", "slug": "inherited_substrate_risk"}], "residual_id": "r:creative_destruction_management:b018_a04_c5", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b018_a04_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Abrupt cutover would cause harm. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["abrupt_cutover_would_cause_harm"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Inherited substrate risk can persist without a cutover, and a cutover can be safe despite inherited conditions.", "slug": "inherited_substrate_risk"}], "normalized_requirement": "Abrupt cutover would cause harm.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Abrupt cutover would cause harm.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 18, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-018", "ledger_sha256": "0d794f02665a559f09b3c1bfed372707fc938160005cbbe18fe35518203d143a"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Credible Signaling", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:credible_signaling", "slug": "credible_signaling"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 5, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a cheap-talk credibility gap. The informed party has private information and may benefit from being believed even when the claim is false or exaggerated. The receiver needs the information for a real decision but cannot directly inspect it in time.\n\nWithout credible signaling, good actors cannot distinguish themselves from bad actors, receivers over-rely on weak proxies, and low-quality mimics can imitate the visible surface of high-quality actors. Over time, signals can also decay: credentials become stale, badges are copied, audits are captured, reputations are manipulated, and once-costly demonstrations become easy to automate.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "An informed party has private information that others need for a decision, but ordinary claims are too cheap to distinguish truthful communication from exaggeration, mimicry, fraud, low commitment, or hidden low quality."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires an uninformed receiver to treat a sender whose type cannot be directly observed.", "role_mapping": "Receiver -> uninformed party; hidden quality -> type; decide -> differential treatment.", "slug": "signaling", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime requires an uninformed designer to allocate terms before directly observing an informed agent's type.", "role_mapping": "Receiver -> designer; hidden quality -> agent type; decide -> menu-based allocation.", "slug": "screening", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b018_a05_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The receiver needs the information for a real decision but cannot directly inspect it in time. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A receiver must decide before the hidden quality, capacity, safety, intent, or commitment can be directly observed.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A receiver must decide before the hidden quality, capacity, safety, intent, or commitment can be directly observed.", "The receiver needs the information for a real decision but cannot directly inspect it in time."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Signaling", "one_liner": "Revealing hidden information.", "page_ref": "prime:signaling", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Receiver -> uninformed party; hidden quality -> type; decide -> differential treatment.", "slug": "signaling", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires an uninformed receiver to treat a sender whose type cannot be directly observed."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Screening", "one_liner": "Inducing self-revelation.", "page_ref": "prime:screening", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Receiver -> designer; hidden quality -> agent type; decide -> menu-based allocation.", "slug": "screening", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires an uninformed designer to allocate terms before directly observing an informed agent's type."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A receiver must decide before the hidden quality, capacity, safety, intent, or commitment can be directly observed.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The differential-cost equilibrium exists because lower-quality types would benefit from favorable receiver treatment if they could imitate the higher type's signal.", "role_mapping": "Sender benefit -> favorable treatment; false belief -> low type mistaken for high type.", "slug": "signaling", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b018_a05_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The informed party has private information and may benefit from being believed even when the claim is false or exaggerated. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The sender benefits from being believed even when the claim is false, exaggerated, or incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The sender benefits from being believed even when the claim is false, exaggerated, or incomplete.", "The informed party has private information and may benefit from being believed even when the claim is false or exaggerated."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Signaling", "one_liner": "Revealing hidden information.", "page_ref": "prime:signaling", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Sender benefit -> favorable treatment; false belief -> low type mistaken for high type.", "slug": "signaling", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The differential-cost equilibrium exists because lower-quality types would benefit from favorable receiver treatment if they could imitate the higher type's signal."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The sender benefits from being believed even when the claim is false, exaggerated, or incomplete.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's load-bearing single-crossing condition requires signal cost to differ systematically by hidden type.", "role_mapping": "Hidden types -> informed types; evidence -> signal; different cost -> type-contingent cost.", "slug": "signaling", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b018_a05_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The archetype works best when the signal is relevant to the hidden attribute, harder for the wrong type to produce, interpretable by receivers, and governed over time. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Different hidden types can produce some evidence at meaningfully different cost, risk, or feasibility.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Different hidden types can produce some evidence at meaningfully different cost, risk, or feasibility.", "The archetype works best when the signal is relevant to the hidden attribute, harder for the wrong type to produce, interpretable by receivers, and governed over time."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Signaling", "one_liner": "Revealing hidden information.", "page_ref": "prime:signaling", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Hidden types -> informed types; evidence -> signal; different cost -> type-contingent cost.", "slug": "signaling", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's load-bearing single-crossing condition requires signal cost to differ systematically by hidden type."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Different hidden types can produce some evidence at meaningfully different cost, risk, or feasibility.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires the receiver to observe who signaled and use that mapping for differential treatment, satisfying the condition's observe alternative.", "role_mapping": "Receiver -> uninformed party; observe -> visible signal action.", "slug": "signaling", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b018_a05_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use Credible Signaling when receivers need to update belief before they can observe the final outcome, and cheap claims are not trustworthy enough. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Receivers can observe, verify, or later sanction the signal.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Receivers can observe, verify, or later sanction the signal.", "Use Credible Signaling when receivers need to update belief before they can observe the final outcome, and cheap claims are not trustworthy enough."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Signaling", "one_liner": "Revealing hidden information.", "page_ref": "prime:signaling", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Receiver -> uninformed party; observe -> visible signal action.", "slug": "signaling", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires the receiver to observe who signaled and use that mapping for differential treatment, satisfying the condition's observe alternative."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Receivers can observe, verify, or later sanction the signal.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires receiver treatment to change as the visible signal updates beliefs about hidden type.", "role_mapping": "Belief update -> inferred type; listed outcome -> differential treatment.", "slug": "signaling", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b018_a05_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use Credible Signaling when receivers need to update belief before they can observe the final outcome, and cheap claims are not trustworthy enough. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Coordination, trust, access, pricing, selection, delegation, or risk sharing depends on the receiver’s belief update.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Coordination, trust, access, pricing, selection, delegation, or risk sharing depends on the receiver’s belief update.", "Use Credible Signaling when receivers need to update belief before they can observe the final outcome, and cheap claims are not trustworthy enough."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Signaling", "one_liner": "Revealing hidden information.", "page_ref": "prime:signaling", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Belief update -> inferred type; listed outcome -> differential treatment.", "slug": "signaling", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires receiver treatment to change as the visible signal updates beliefs about hidden type."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Coordination, trust, access, pricing, selection, delegation, or risk sharing depends on the receiver’s belief update.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 18, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-018", "ledger_sha256": "0d794f02665a559f09b3c1bfed372707fc938160005cbbe18fe35518203d143a"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Critical Juncture Path Stewardship", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:critical_juncture_path_stewardship", "slug": "critical_juncture_path_stewardship"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 5, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A political, organizational, ecological, technical, or institutional system enters a bounded moment where several future trajectories are still plausible. Small variations in timing, sequence, framing, participation, resource placement, standards, or early commitments can push the system into one path. Once that path begins to accumulate coordination, sunk cost, precedent, dependency, network effects, habit, legitimacy, or infrastructure, alternatives become difficult to recover.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A political, organizational, ecological, technical, or institutional system enters a bounded moment where several future trajectories are still plausible. Small variations in timing, sequence, framing, participation, resource placement, standards, or early commitments can push the system into one path. Once that path begins to accumulate coordination, sunk cost, precedent, dependency, network effects, habit, legitimacy, or infrastructure, alternatives become difficult to recover."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime is a bounded moment of unusually high sensitivity in which choice has lasting consequences.", "role_mapping": "Listed opening -> juncture; time-bounded -> moment of high sensitivity.", "slug": "critical_juncture", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b018_a06_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A political, organizational, ecological, technical, or institutional system enters a bounded moment where several future trajectories are still plausible. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A decision, crisis, transition, leadership change, policy window, standard-setting moment, ecological disturbance, platform shift, or institutional opening is time-bounded.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A decision, crisis, transition, leadership change, policy window, standard-setting moment, ecological disturbance, platform shift, or institutional opening is time-bounded.", "A political, organizational, ecological, technical, or institutional system enters a bounded moment where several future trajectories are still plausible."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Critical Juncture", "one_liner": "Moment where small variations produce divergent locked-in paths.", "page_ref": "prime:critical_juncture", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Listed opening -> juncture; time-bounded -> moment of high sensitivity.", "slug": "critical_juncture", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime is a bounded moment of unusually high sensitivity in which choice has lasting consequences."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A decision, crisis, transition, leadership change, policy window, standard-setting moment, ecological disturbance, platform shift, or institutional opening is time-bounded.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires small variations at the juncture to select among divergent future paths.", "role_mapping": "Trajectories -> alternative paths; plausible -> not yet locked; materially different -> divergence.", "slug": "critical_juncture", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b018_a06_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A political, organizational, ecological, technical, or institutional system enters a bounded moment where several future trajectories are still plausible. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Several future trajectories remain plausible and materially different.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Several future trajectories remain plausible and materially different.", "A political, organizational, ecological, technical, or institutional system enters a bounded moment where several future trajectories are still plausible."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Critical Juncture", "one_liner": "Moment where small variations produce divergent locked-in paths.", "page_ref": "prime:critical_juncture", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Trajectories -> alternative paths; plausible -> not yet locked; materially different -> divergence.", "slug": "critical_juncture", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires small variations at the juncture to select among divergent future paths."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Several future trajectories remain plausible and materially different.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's defining sensitivity is that small variations at the moment produce divergent locked-in paths.", "role_mapping": "Small changes -> contingent choice; dominant trajectory -> selected path.", "slug": "critical_juncture", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b018_a06_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Small variations in timing, sequence, framing, participation, resource placement, standards, or early commitments can push the system into one path. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Small changes to timing, sequence, framing, coalition, resource allocation, rule wording, pilot design, or early standards could influence which trajectory becomes dominant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Small changes to timing, sequence, framing, coalition, resource allocation, rule wording, pilot design, or early standards could influence which trajectory becomes dominant.", "Small variations in timing, sequence, framing, participation, resource placement, standards, or early commitments can push the system into one path."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Critical Juncture", "one_liner": "Moment where small variations produce divergent locked-in paths.", "page_ref": "prime:critical_juncture", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Small changes -> contingent choice; dominant trajectory -> selected path.", "slug": "critical_juncture", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's defining sensitivity is that small variations at the moment produce divergent locked-in paths."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Small changes to timing, sequence, framing, coalition, resource allocation, rule wording, pilot design, or early standards could influence which trajectory becomes dominant.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime ends in path-dependent lock-in after the consequential choice.", "role_mapping": "Mechanisms -> lock-in; later reversal harder -> persistent path.", "slug": "critical_juncture", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime requires increasing returns or complementarity to raise switching costs and preserve a historically selected path against present counter-incentives.", "role_mapping": "Listed mechanism -> increasing returns/complementarity; harder reversal -> lock-in.", "slug": "path_dependence", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b018_a06_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Once that path begins to accumulate coordination, sunk cost, precedent, dependency, network effects, habit, legitimacy, or infrastructure, alternatives become difficult to recover. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Path-dependence mechanisms such as sunk cost, precedent, network effects, coordination equilibrium, infrastructure, habit, legitimacy, or dependency will make later reversal harder.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Path-dependence mechanisms such as sunk cost, precedent, network effects, coordination equilibrium, infrastructure, habit, legitimacy, or dependency will make later reversal harder.", "Once that path begins to accumulate coordination, sunk cost, precedent, dependency, network effects, habit, legitimacy, or infrastructure, alternatives become difficult to recover."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Critical Juncture", "one_liner": "Moment where small variations produce divergent locked-in paths.", "page_ref": "prime:critical_juncture", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Mechanisms -> lock-in; later reversal harder -> persistent path.", "slug": "critical_juncture", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime ends in path-dependent lock-in after the consequential choice."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Path Dependence", "one_liner": "Outcomes are shaped by the specific historical sequence of past choices, which lock in consequences and foreclose alternatives that persist despite present incentives to change.", "page_ref": "prime:path_dependence", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Listed mechanism -> increasing returns/complementarity; harder reversal -> lock-in.", "slug": "path_dependence", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires increasing returns or complementarity to raise switching costs and preserve a historically selected path against present counter-incentives."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Path-dependence mechanisms such as sunk cost, precedent, network effects, coordination equilibrium, infrastructure, habit, legitimacy, or dependency will make later reversal harder.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A critical juncture is the still-open high-sensitivity moment at which agency and contingency can select the future path.", "role_mapping": "Can act -> agency at juncture; before closure -> high-sensitivity window.", "slug": "critical_juncture", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b018_a06_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Decision-makers can still act before the receptive window closes or the reversibility horizon is crossed. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Decision-makers can still act before the receptive window closes or the reversibility horizon is crossed."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Critical Juncture", "one_liner": "Moment where small variations produce divergent locked-in paths.", "page_ref": "prime:critical_juncture", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Can act -> agency at juncture; before closure -> high-sensitivity window.", "slug": "critical_juncture", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A critical juncture is the still-open high-sensitivity moment at which agency and contingency can select the future path."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Decision-makers can still act before the receptive window closes or the reversibility horizon is crossed.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P022-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve complete-certainty waiting as the antecedent without requiring that the waiting is actually occurring.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The conditional antecedent is a decision process waiting for complete certainty.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the conditional “would allow” modality and must not require that either antecedent or outcome has occurred.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "If complete-certainty waiting occurred, it would allow default momentum to act.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail the conditional causal enablement from complete-certainty waiting to default path selection.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Under the conditional, waiting for complete certainty would enable default momentum to select a path.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve default momentum, not a deliberate chooser, as the selecting mechanism.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Default momentum is the path-selecting force in the consequent.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}], "predicate": "Waiting for complete certainty would allow default momentum to select a path.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Certainty-seeking delay would let default momentum select a path.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P022-C05-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P022-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve rushed commitment as the antecedent without requiring that rushing is actually occurring.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The conditional antecedent is a commitment decision being rushed.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve that the hypothetical commitment would happen earlier than warranted.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Under the antecedent, commitment would occur prematurely.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail the conditional causal relation from rushed commitment to loss of alternatives.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "If commitment were rushed, it would erase alternatives.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require conditional removal of alternatives, not merely that they would become less attractive.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Under the consequent, previously available alternatives would cease to remain available.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Rushing commitment would erase alternatives prematurely.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Prematurely rushed commitment would erase alternatives.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P022-C05-U2"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A critical juncture can involve a clear immediate choice without both complete-certainty delay and premature-commitment hazards.", "slug": "critical_juncture"}], "residual_id": "r:critical_juncture_path_stewardship:b018_a06_c7", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b018_a06_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Small variations in timing, sequence, framing, participation, resource placement, standards, or early commitments can push the system into one path. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Waiting for complete certainty would allow default momentum to select a path, but rushing commitment would erase alternatives prematurely.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Waiting for complete certainty would allow default momentum to select a path, but rushing commitment would erase alternatives prematurely.", "Small variations in timing, sequence, framing, participation, resource placement, standards, or early commitments can push the system into one path."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 2, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 2}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A critical juncture can involve a clear immediate choice without both complete-certainty delay and premature-commitment hazards.", "slug": "critical_juncture"}], "normalized_requirement": "Waiting for complete certainty would allow default momentum to select a path, but rushing commitment would erase alternatives prematurely.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 2 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Waiting for complete certainty would allow default momentum to select a path, but rushing commitment would erase alternatives prematurely.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Stakeholder alignment, legitimacy, and affected-party participation can still influence path selection.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Small variations in timing, sequence, framing, participation, resource placement, standards, or early commitments can push the system into one path. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Stakeholder alignment, legitimacy, and affected-party participation can still influence path selection. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Stakeholder alignment, legitimacy, and affected-party participation can still influence path selection.", "Small variations in timing, sequence, framing, participation, resource placement, standards, or early commitments can push the system into one path."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Stakeholder alignment, legitimacy, and affected-party participation can still influence path selection."}, {"display_text": "A post-juncture stabilization plan is feasible once a path is deliberately selected.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Once that path begins to accumulate coordination, sunk cost, precedent, dependency, network effects, habit, legitimacy, or infrastructure, alternatives become difficult to recover. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: A post-juncture stabilization plan is feasible once a path is deliberately selected. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A post-juncture stabilization plan is feasible once a path is deliberately selected.", "Once that path begins to accumulate coordination, sunk cost, precedent, dependency, network effects, habit, legitimacy, or infrastructure, alternatives become difficult to recover."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 8, "text": "A post-juncture stabilization plan is feasible once a path is deliberately selected."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 18, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-018", "ledger_sha256": "0d794f02665a559f09b3c1bfed372707fc938160005cbbe18fe35518203d143a"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Critical Mass Building", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:critical_mass_building", "slug": "critical_mass_building"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 3 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is threshold-dependent fragility. Below critical mass, the desired pattern may be rationally unattractive even to actors who support it in principle. Users do not join because there are not enough users. Vendors do not implement a standard because too few customers demand it. Community members do not return because the group is too quiet. Teams do not adopt a practice because too few peers can help them.\n\nThe result is a circular start-up problem: the pattern needs mass to become valuable, but it needs value to attract mass. Critical Mass Building breaks this loop by temporarily supplying enough seed density, support, legitimacy, and reinforcement for the pattern to reach the point where ordinary dynamics can take over.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A beneficial pattern requires enough participants, density, resources, or alignment before it becomes self-sustaining."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Critical mass also governs undesirable epidemics and chain reactions and therefore does not entail a desired or valuable pattern.", "slug": "critical_mass"}], "residual_id": "r:critical_mass_building:b018_a07_c1", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b018_a07_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A beneficial pattern requires enough participants, density, resources, or alignment before it becomes self-sustaining. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A desired pattern is valuable only after enough participation, density, coverage, resource stock, or alignment exists.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A desired pattern is valuable only after enough participation, density, coverage, resource stock, or alignment exists.", "A beneficial pattern requires enough participants, density, resources, or alignment before it becomes self-sustaining."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Critical mass also governs undesirable epidemics and chain reactions and therefore does not entail a desired or valuable pattern.", "slug": "critical_mass"}], "normalized_requirement": "A desired pattern is valuable only after enough participation, density, coverage, resource stock, or alignment exists.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A desired pattern is valuable only after enough participation, density, coverage, resource stock, or alignment exists.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A substrate-general critical-mass process need not contain participants, benefits, social risk, compatibility, or actors joining.", "slug": "critical_mass"}], "residual_id": "r:critical_mass_building:b018_a07_c2", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b018_a07_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when early participation has real value only after complementary participants, compatible tools, trusted norms, repeated use, or local support are present. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Early participation is fragile because benefits are delayed, uncertain, socially risky, incompatible, or dependent on others joining.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Early participation is fragile because benefits are delayed, uncertain, socially risky, incompatible, or dependent on others joining.", "It is especially useful when early participation has real value only after complementary participants, compatible tools, trusted norms, repeated use, or local support are present."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A substrate-general critical-mass process need not contain participants, benefits, social risk, compatibility, or actors joining.", "slug": "critical_mass"}], "normalized_requirement": "Early participation is fragile because benefits are delayed, uncertain, socially risky, incompatible, or dependent on others joining.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Early participation is fragile because benefits are delayed, uncertain, socially risky, incompatible, or dependent on others joining.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires per-event reproduction to cross unity, after which the process carries and reproduces itself.", "role_mapping": "Reinforcing loop -> reproduction; critical condition -> threshold; takes over -> self-sustenance.", "slug": "critical_mass", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b018_a07_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Critical Mass Building breaks this loop by temporarily supplying enough seed density, support, legitimacy, and reinforcement for the pattern to reach the point where ordinary dynamics can take over. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: There is a plausible reinforcing loop that can take over after the critical condition is crossed.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["There is a plausible reinforcing loop that can take over after the critical condition is crossed.", "Critical Mass Building breaks this loop by temporarily supplying enough seed density, support, legitimacy, and reinforcement for the pattern to reach the point where ordinary dynamics can take over."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Critical Mass", "one_liner": "The minimum quantity needed to sustain a self-perpetuating process.", "page_ref": "prime:critical_mass", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Reinforcing loop -> reproduction; critical condition -> threshold; takes over -> self-sustenance.", "slug": "critical_mass", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires per-event reproduction to cross unity, after which the process carries and reproduces itself."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "There is a plausible reinforcing loop that can take over after the critical condition is crossed.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The system can intentionally seed, subsidize, protect, coordinate, or concentrate early adoption instead of waiting for spontaneous emergence.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: The system can intentionally seed, subsidize, protect, coordinate, or concentrate early adoption instead of waiting for spontaneous emergence. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The system can intentionally seed, subsidize, protect, coordinate, or concentrate early adoption instead of waiting for spontaneous emergence."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "The system can intentionally seed, subsidize, protect, coordinate, or concentrate early adoption instead of waiting for spontaneous emergence."}, {"display_text": "The desired order should become self-sustaining rather than permanently dependent on the launch team or subsidy.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A beneficial pattern requires enough participants, density, resources, or alignment before it becomes self-sustaining. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: The desired order should become self-sustaining rather than permanently dependent on the launch team or subsidy. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The desired order should become self-sustaining rather than permanently dependent on the launch team or subsidy.", "A beneficial pattern requires enough participants, density, resources, or alignment before it becomes self-sustaining."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The desired order should become self-sustaining rather than permanently dependent on the launch team or subsidy."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 18, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-018", "ledger_sha256": "0d794f02665a559f09b3c1bfed372707fc938160005cbbe18fe35518203d143a"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Critical-Window Intervention Timing", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:critical_window_intervention_timing", "slug": "critical_window_intervention_timing"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A desired configuration can be acquired efficiently only while a receiving system occupies a bounded high-malleability state. The window may open and close through maturation, experience, ecological stage, injury, context, or second-order plasticity. Because closure changes later feasibility or cost, ordinary scheduling, steady-state dose reasoning, and generic learning support are insufficient. If the opening is not detected, resources are not ready, exposure is poorly matched, uptake is not stabilized, or access is unequal, the system can leave the interval without the target configuration. Conversely, overstating the window can manufacture urgency, justify coercion, deny later support, and turn uncertain group evidence into a deterministic cutoff.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A desired configuration can be acquired efficiently only while a receiving system occupies a bounded high-malleability state. The window may open and close through maturation, experience, ecological stage, injury, context, or second-order plasticity. Because closure changes later feasibility or cost, ordinary scheduling, steady-state dose reasoning, and generic learning support are insufficient. If the opening is not detected, resources are not ready, exposure is poorly matched, uptake is not stabilized, or access is unequal, the system can leave the interval without the target configuration. Conversely, overstating the window can manufacture urgency, justify coercion, deny later support, and turn uncertain group evidence into a deterministic cutoff."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A critical period can exist before longitudinal, mechanistic, or comparative evidence has established it.", "slug": "critical_period"}], "residual_id": "r:critical_window_intervention_timing:b018_a08_c1", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b018_a08_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Waiting for perfect evidence can consume the window; acting on weak proxies can target the wrong people, time, or input. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Longitudinal, mechanistic, or comparative evidence indicates that the same input has materially different acquisition effects across time or receiving-system state.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Longitudinal, mechanistic, or comparative evidence indicates that the same input has materially different acquisition effects across time or receiving-system state.", "Waiting for perfect evidence can consume the window; acting on weak proxies can target the wrong people, time, or input."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A critical period can exist before longitudinal, mechanistic, or comparative evidence has established it.", "slug": "critical_period"}], "normalized_requirement": "Longitudinal, mechanistic, or comparative evidence indicates that the same input has materially different acquisition effects across time or receiving-system state.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Longitudinal, mechanistic, or comparative evidence indicates that the same input has materially different acquisition effects across time or receiving-system state.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires an input to be present during the malleability window for the configuration to be acquired.", "role_mapping": "Experience or treatment -> required input; not maturation alone -> input requirement.", "slug": "critical_period", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b018_a08_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Concentrated exposure can exploit receptivity, yet overload or narrow experience can stabilize the wrong configuration. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The target configuration requires experience, cue exposure, practice, interaction, or treatment rather than appearing automatically with maturation.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The target configuration requires experience, cue exposure, practice, interaction, or treatment rather than appearing automatically with maturation.", "Concentrated exposure can exploit receptivity, yet overload or narrow experience can stabilize the wrong configuration."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Critical Period", "one_liner": "A time-gated window of elevated malleability during which a configuration can be acquired, after which the same inputs are far harder or impossible to take on.", "page_ref": "prime:critical_period", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Experience or treatment -> required input; not maturation alone -> input requirement.", "slug": "critical_period", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires an input to be present during the malleability window for the configuration to be acquired."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The target configuration requires experience, cue exposure, practice, interaction, or treatment rather than appearing automatically with maturation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime requires a bounded window but does not require its opening and closing times to be estimable in the case at hand.", "slug": "critical_period"}], "residual_id": "r:critical_window_intervention_timing:b018_a08_c3", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b018_a08_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "If the opening is not detected, resources are not ready, exposure is poorly matched, uptake is not stabilized, or access is unequal, the system can leave the interval without the target configuration. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A bounded opening and closing interval can be estimated, even if only probabilistically.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A bounded opening and closing interval can be estimated, even if only probabilistically.", "If the opening is not detected, resources are not ready, exposure is poorly matched, uptake is not stabilized, or access is unequal, the system can leave the interval without the target configuration."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime requires a bounded window but does not require its opening and closing times to be estimable in the case at hand.", "slug": "critical_period"}], "normalized_requirement": "A bounded opening and closing interval can be estimated, even if only probabilistically.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A bounded opening and closing interval can be estimated, even if only probabilistically.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a post-closure asymmetry in which the same configuration becomes much harder or impossible to acquire.", "role_mapping": "Missing interval -> post-closure; durable disadvantage/cost -> acquisition asymmetry.", "slug": "critical_period", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b018_a08_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Because closure changes later feasibility or cost, ordinary scheduling, steady-state dose reasoning, and generic learning support are insufficient. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Missing the interval creates durable disadvantage, higher later cost, lower fidelity, or a different feasible outcome set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Missing the interval creates durable disadvantage, higher later cost, lower fidelity, or a different feasible outcome set.", "Because closure changes later feasibility or cost, ordinary scheduling, steady-state dose reasoning, and generic learning support are insufficient."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Critical Period", "one_liner": "A time-gated window of elevated malleability during which a configuration can be acquired, after which the same inputs are far harder or impossible to take on.", "page_ref": "prime:critical_period", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Missing interval -> post-closure; durable disadvantage/cost -> acquisition asymmetry.", "slug": "critical_period", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a post-closure asymmetry in which the same configuration becomes much harder or impossible to acquire."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Missing the interval creates durable disadvantage, higher later cost, lower fidelity, or a different feasible outcome set.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Resources, access, environment, or consent must be prepared before the window because delivery lead time is nontrivial.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Waiting for perfect evidence can consume the window; acting on weak proxies can target the wrong people, time, or input. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: Resources, access, environment, or consent must be prepared before the window because delivery lead time is nontrivial. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Resources, access, environment, or consent must be prepared before the window because delivery lead time is nontrivial.", "Waiting for perfect evidence can consume the window; acting on weak proxies can target the wrong people, time, or input."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Resources, access, environment, or consent must be prepared before the window because delivery lead time is nontrivial."}, {"display_text": "Immediate response is not sufficient; stabilization, retention, or transfer must be verified after the active interval.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this deployment constraint: Immediate response is not sufficient; stabilization, retention, or transfer must be verified after the active interval. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Immediate response is not sufficient; stabilization, retention, or transfer must be verified after the active interval."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Immediate response is not sufficient; stabilization, retention, or transfer must be verified after the active interval."}, {"display_text": "Substantial heterogeneity means calendar age or one population average cannot safely determine individual eligibility.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this deployment constraint: Substantial heterogeneity means calendar age or one population average cannot safely determine individual eligibility. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Substantial heterogeneity means calendar age or one population average cannot safely determine individual eligibility."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "Substantial heterogeneity means calendar age or one population average cannot safely determine individual eligibility."}, {"display_text": "A fallback or compensatory route is necessary because some cases will be detected late or fail the primary pathway.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this deployment constraint: A fallback or compensatory route is necessary because some cases will be detected late or fail the primary pathway. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A fallback or compensatory route is necessary because some cases will be detected late or fail the primary pathway."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 8, "text": "A fallback or compensatory route is necessary because some cases will be detected late or fail the primary pathway."}, {"display_text": "An intervention can itself alter receptivity, closure, or later developmental organization.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Because closure changes later feasibility or cost, ordinary scheduling, steady-state dose reasoning, and generic learning support are insufficient. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: An intervention can itself alter receptivity, closure, or later developmental organization. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [9], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["An intervention can itself alter receptivity, closure, or later developmental organization.", "Because closure changes later feasibility or cost, ordinary scheduling, steady-state dose reasoning, and generic learning support are insufficient."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 9, "text": "An intervention can itself alter receptivity, closure, or later developmental organization."}, {"display_text": "The cost of false urgency and false reassurance are both significant enough to require explicit uncertainty and review.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this deployment constraint: The cost of false urgency and false reassurance are both significant enough to require explicit uncertainty and review. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [10], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The cost of false urgency and false reassurance are both significant enough to require explicit uncertainty and review."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 10, "text": "The cost of false urgency and false reassurance are both significant enough to require explicit uncertainty and review."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 18, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-018", "ledger_sha256": "0d794f02665a559f09b3c1bfed372707fc938160005cbbe18fe35518203d143a"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": [{"groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "I attempted to preserve the candidate and the one stated qualifier while falsifying the selected DNF branch; no such instance remains because the qualifier binds exactly O6 and all other branch obligations are directly entailed.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Carryover Effect", "one_liner": "The validity threat in crossover and within-subject designs where residual influence from an earlier treatment persists into a later measurement window, biasing the contrast — its magnitude set by the unit's relaxation time against the inter-treatment gap.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:carryover_effect", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O6"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "carried_state_is_later_developmental_organization", "predicate": "the carried internal-state alteration is later developmental organization", "rationale": "The exact record supplies the principal roles and relation family, while one candidate-anchored atomic context fact fills the only gap in the selected complete DNF branch."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "carryover_effect"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "carried_state_is_later_developmental_organization"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "carryover_effect", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P022-C06-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record preserves the unit's principal roles and relation family, and one atomic candidate-anchored context fact fills the only gap in a complete DNF branch."}], "publication_role": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT_ONLY", "source_residual_occurrence_id": "r:critical_window_intervention_timing:b018_a08_c9", "unit": {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P022-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the intervention itself as the source of the alteration.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An intervention is the causal actor.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the possibility expressed by “can.”", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The intervention is capable of causing the alteration without requiring that it has done so.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail intervention-caused change, not background maturation alone.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The intervention itself can alter the receiving system.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires change in receptivity.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The possible alteration affects receptivity.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires change in closure behavior or timing.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The possible alteration affects closure of the window or state.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a change in subsequent developmental organization.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The possible alteration affects later developmental organization.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "An intervention can itself alter receptivity, closure, or later developmental organization.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An intervention can itself alter receptivity, closure, or later developmental organization.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P022-C06-U1"}}]}
{"archetype": {"name": "Criticality Envelope Management", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:criticality_envelope_management", "slug": "criticality_envelope_management"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 3, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 3 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system is operating near a phase boundary where ordinary local, linear, or single-scale controls no longer describe its response. Correlations widen, perturbations propagate farther than expected, and small changes in control parameters may produce disproportionate, cascading, or regime-shifting effects. Without an explicit criticality envelope, operators either over-dampen a useful adaptive regime or unknowingly let fragile synchronization and runaway propagation accumulate.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system is operating near a phase boundary where ordinary local, linear, or single-scale controls no longer describe its response. Correlations widen, perturbations propagate farther than expected, and small changes in control parameters may produce disproportionate, cascading, or regime-shifting effects. Without an explicit criticality envelope, operators either over-dampen a useful adaptive regime or unknowingly let fragile synchronization and runaway propagation accumulate."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires divergent susceptibility at a phase boundary, so small control-parameter changes produce scale-free or disproportionate response.", "role_mapping": "Listed pressure -> control parameter; disproportionate change -> divergent susceptibility.", "slug": "criticality", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime requires an abrupt state change when a control parameter crosses a boundary.", "role_mapping": "Listed pressure -> control parameter; abrupt change -> transition.", "slug": "tipping_points_or_phase_transitions", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b018_a09_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Correlations widen, perturbations propagate farther than expected, and small changes in control parameters may produce disproportionate, cascading, or regime-shifting effects. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The system shows abrupt or disproportionate changes as load, density, coupling, synchronization, stress, participation, or resource pressure changes.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The system shows abrupt or disproportionate changes as load, density, coupling, synchronization, stress, participation, or resource pressure changes.", "Correlations widen, perturbations propagate farther than expected, and small changes in control parameters may produce disproportionate, cascading, or regime-shifting effects."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Criticality", "one_liner": "Regime poised at a phase boundary where response becomes scale-free and correlations diverge.", "page_ref": "prime:criticality", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Listed pressure -> control parameter; disproportionate change -> divergent susceptibility.", "slug": "criticality", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires divergent susceptibility at a phase boundary, so small control-parameter changes produce scale-free or disproportionate response."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Tipping Points (or Phase Transitions)", "one_liner": "Abrupt state change.", "page_ref": "prime:tipping_points_or_phase_transitions", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Listed pressure -> control parameter; abrupt change -> transition.", "slug": "tipping_points_or_phase_transitions", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires an abrupt state change when a control parameter crosses a boundary."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The system shows abrupt or disproportionate changes as load, density, coupling, synchronization, stress, participation, or resource pressure changes.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "At criticality the response lacks a characteristic scale and correlations diverge, so local perturbations can have cross-scale effects.", "role_mapping": "Local perturbation -> input; cross-scale effect -> scale-free response.", "slug": "criticality", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b018_a09_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Correlations widen, perturbations propagate farther than expected, and small changes in control parameters may produce disproportionate, cascading, or regime-shifting effects. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Local perturbations sometimes produce cross-scale or system-wide effects rather than remaining local.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Local perturbations sometimes produce cross-scale or system-wide effects rather than remaining local.", "Correlations widen, perturbations propagate farther than expected, and small changes in control parameters may produce disproportionate, cascading, or regime-shifting effects."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Criticality", "one_liner": "Regime poised at a phase boundary where response becomes scale-free and correlations diverge.", "page_ref": "prime:criticality", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Local perturbation -> input; cross-scale effect -> scale-free response.", "slug": "criticality", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "At criticality the response lacks a characteristic scale and correlations diverge, so local perturbations can have cross-scale effects."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Local perturbations sometimes produce cross-scale or system-wide effects rather than remaining local.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires divergent correlations and susceptibility with scale-free event statistics at the approached phase boundary.", "role_mapping": "Growing correlation/events -> early warning; boundary -> critical value.", "slug": "criticality", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b018_a09_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Correlation, variance, heavy-tailed events, recovery time, or cascade size appears to grow as the system approaches a boundary. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Correlation, variance, heavy-tailed events, recovery time, or cascade size appears to grow as the system approaches a boundary."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Criticality", "one_liner": "Regime poised at a phase boundary where response becomes scale-free and correlations diverge.", "page_ref": "prime:criticality", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Growing correlation/events -> early warning; boundary -> critical value.", "slug": "criticality", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires divergent correlations and susceptibility with scale-free event statistics at the approached phase boundary."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Correlation, variance, heavy-tailed events, recovery time, or cascade size appears to grow as the system approaches a boundary.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P022-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve already-existing threshold rules as the object of evaluation.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Existing threshold rules are the evaluated controls.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail inadequacy of the rules, not merely existence of thresholds.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The existing threshold rules are judged too crude for the problem.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must explicitly exclude a one-crossing-event characterization.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The problem is not a single threshold-crossing event.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must characterize the target as a susceptibility regime rather than a point event.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The problem is a regime of rising susceptibility.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the explanatory link from the problem structure to rule inadequacy.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The regime-versus-event structure is the reason the threshold rules are too crude.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Existing threshold rules are too crude because the problem is not one crossing event but a regime of rising susceptibility.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Existing threshold rules are too crude because rising susceptibility is a regime, not one crossing event.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P022-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Criticality can be characterized without any existing threshold rule or a judgment that such a rule is too crude.", "slug": "criticality"}], "residual_id": "r:criticality_envelope_management:b018_a09_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b018_a09_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Existing threshold rules are too crude because the problem is not one crossing event but a regime of rising susceptibility. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Existing threshold rules are too crude because the problem is not one crossing event but a regime of rising susceptibility."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Criticality can be characterized without any existing threshold rule or a judgment that such a rule is too crude.", "slug": "criticality"}], "normalized_requirement": "Existing threshold rules are too crude because the problem is not one crossing event but a regime of rising susceptibility.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Existing threshold rules are too crude because the problem is not one crossing event but a regime of rising susceptibility.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires divergent susceptibility at a phase boundary, so small control-parameter changes produce scale-free or disproportionate response.", "role_mapping": "Listed pressure -> control parameter; disproportionate change -> divergent susceptibility.", "slug": "criticality", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime requires an abrupt state change when a control parameter crosses a boundary.", "role_mapping": "Listed pressure -> control parameter; abrupt change -> transition.", "slug": "tipping_points_or_phase_transitions", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b018_a09_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Correlations widen, perturbations propagate farther than expected, and small changes in control parameters may produce disproportionate, cascading, or regime-shifting effects. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The system shows abrupt or disproportionate changes as load, density, coupling, synchronization, stress, participation, or resource pressure changes.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The system shows abrupt or disproportionate changes as load, density, coupling, synchronization, stress, participation, or resource pressure changes.", "Correlations widen, perturbations propagate farther than expected, and small changes in control parameters may produce disproportionate, cascading, or regime-shifting effects."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Criticality", "one_liner": "Regime poised at a phase boundary where response becomes scale-free and correlations diverge.", "page_ref": "prime:criticality", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Listed pressure -> control parameter; disproportionate change -> divergent susceptibility.", "slug": "criticality", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires divergent susceptibility at a phase boundary, so small control-parameter changes produce scale-free or disproportionate response."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Tipping Points (or Phase Transitions)", "one_liner": "Abrupt state change.", "page_ref": "prime:tipping_points_or_phase_transitions", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Listed pressure -> control parameter; abrupt change -> transition.", "slug": "tipping_points_or_phase_transitions", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires an abrupt state change when a control parameter crosses a boundary."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The system shows abrupt or disproportionate changes as load, density, coupling, synchronization, stress, participation, or resource pressure changes.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires divergent correlations and susceptibility with scale-free event statistics at the approached phase boundary.", "role_mapping": "Growing correlation/events -> early warning; boundary -> critical value.", "slug": "criticality", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b018_a09_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Correlation, variance, heavy-tailed events, recovery time, or cascade size appears to grow as the system approaches a boundary. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Correlation, variance, heavy-tailed events, recovery time, or cascade size appears to grow as the system approaches a boundary."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Criticality", "one_liner": "Regime poised at a phase boundary where response becomes scale-free and correlations diverge.", "page_ref": "prime:criticality", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Growing correlation/events -> early warning; boundary -> critical value.", "slug": "criticality", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires divergent correlations and susceptibility with scale-free event statistics at the approached phase boundary."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Correlation, variance, heavy-tailed events, recovery time, or cascade size appears to grow as the system approaches a boundary.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P022-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve at least a local scale and a broader nonlocal scale.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Indicators or signals are observed at multiple scales.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail cross-scale disagreement, not merely different measurements.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The local and broader-scale observations disagree.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the normal-looking local observation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Local indicators look normal.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve synchronization at a network, aggregate, long-range, or equivalent broader scale.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Broader-scale signals become synchronized.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Multiple scales of observation disagree: local indicators look normal while network, aggregate, or long-range signals become synchronized.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Local indicators look normal while broader-scale signals become synchronized.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P022-C08-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime's multi-scale chaos-order feedback does not require normal local indicators or synchronized aggregate signals.", "slug": "self_organized_criticality"}], "residual_id": "r:criticality_envelope_management:b018_a09_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b018_a09_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system is operating near a phase boundary where ordinary local, linear, or single-scale controls no longer describe its response. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Multiple scales of observation disagree: local indicators look normal while network, aggregate, or long-range signals become synchronized.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Multiple scales of observation disagree: local indicators look normal while network, aggregate, or long-range signals become synchronized.", "A system is operating near a phase boundary where ordinary local, linear, or single-scale controls no longer describe its response."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "I attempted to preserve a complete candidate instance while falsifying each unit obligation; the exact record's local-versus-broader mismatch and common movement leave no counterexample.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Concentration Illusion", "one_liner": "The failure where a portfolio looks diversified across many labels but its holdings share a hidden common factor — so a single shock moves them together and realized risk tracks the rank of the factor-exposure matrix, not the count of positions.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:concentration_illusion", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "concentration_illusion"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "concentration_illusion", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P022-C08-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record preserves the unit's principal roles and relation family without any qualifier."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Multiple scales of observation disagree: local indicators look normal while network, aggregate, or long-range signals become synchronized.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires divergent susceptibility at a phase boundary, so small control-parameter changes produce scale-free or disproportionate response.", "role_mapping": "Listed pressure -> control parameter; disproportionate change -> divergent susceptibility.", "slug": "criticality", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime requires an abrupt state change when a control parameter crosses a boundary.", "role_mapping": "Listed pressure -> control parameter; abrupt change -> transition.", "slug": "tipping_points_or_phase_transitions", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b018_a09_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Correlations widen, perturbations propagate farther than expected, and small changes in control parameters may produce disproportionate, cascading, or regime-shifting effects. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The system shows abrupt or disproportionate changes as load, density, coupling, synchronization, stress, participation, or resource pressure changes.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The system shows abrupt or disproportionate changes as load, density, coupling, synchronization, stress, participation, or resource pressure changes.", "Correlations widen, perturbations propagate farther than expected, and small changes in control parameters may produce disproportionate, cascading, or regime-shifting effects."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Criticality", "one_liner": "Regime poised at a phase boundary where response becomes scale-free and correlations diverge.", "page_ref": "prime:criticality", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Listed pressure -> control parameter; disproportionate change -> divergent susceptibility.", "slug": "criticality", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires divergent susceptibility at a phase boundary, so small control-parameter changes produce scale-free or disproportionate response."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Tipping Points (or Phase Transitions)", "one_liner": "Abrupt state change.", "page_ref": "prime:tipping_points_or_phase_transitions", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Listed pressure -> control parameter; abrupt change -> transition.", "slug": "tipping_points_or_phase_transitions", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires an abrupt state change when a control parameter crosses a boundary."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The system shows abrupt or disproportionate changes as load, density, coupling, synchronization, stress, participation, or resource pressure changes.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "At criticality the response lacks a characteristic scale and correlations diverge, so local perturbations can have cross-scale effects.", "role_mapping": "Local perturbation -> input; cross-scale effect -> scale-free response.", "slug": "criticality", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b018_a09_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Correlations widen, perturbations propagate farther than expected, and small changes in control parameters may produce disproportionate, cascading, or regime-shifting effects. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Local perturbations sometimes produce cross-scale or system-wide effects rather than remaining local.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Local perturbations sometimes produce cross-scale or system-wide effects rather than remaining local.", "Correlations widen, perturbations propagate farther than expected, and small changes in control parameters may produce disproportionate, cascading, or regime-shifting effects."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Criticality", "one_liner": "Regime poised at a phase boundary where response becomes scale-free and correlations diverge.", "page_ref": "prime:criticality", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Local perturbation -> input; cross-scale effect -> scale-free response.", "slug": "criticality", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "At criticality the response lacks a characteristic scale and correlations diverge, so local perturbations can have cross-scale effects."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Local perturbations sometimes produce cross-scale or system-wide effects rather than remaining local.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P022-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the system as the entity alternating between states.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A system is the bearer of the dynamic pattern.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require alternation rather than one isolated transition.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The system alternates between two recurring states.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a stable but inert phase.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "One alternating state is inert stability.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve abrupt cascading activity as the contrasting phase.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The other alternating state consists of sudden cascades.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the inferential relation expressed by “suggesting,” not assert proof.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The alternation is evidence suggesting poor tuning.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve both gain and damping as the tuning targets.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "Gain and damping are the jointly implicated control properties.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the negative tuning assessment.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The gain and damping are suggested to be poorly tuned.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "The system alternates between inert stability and sudden cascades, suggesting gain and damping are poorly tuned.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Alternation between inert stability and sudden cascades suggests poor gain-and-damping tuning.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P022-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Punctuated equilibrium need not involve cascades or a gain-and-damping control failure.", "slug": "punctuated_equilibrium"}], "residual_id": "r:criticality_envelope_management:b018_a09_c7", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b018_a09_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The system alternates between inert stability and sudden cascades, suggesting gain and damping are poorly tuned. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The system alternates between inert stability and sudden cascades, suggesting gain and damping are poorly tuned."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Punctuated equilibrium need not involve cascades or a gain-and-damping control failure.", "slug": "punctuated_equilibrium"}], "normalized_requirement": "The system alternates between inert stability and sudden cascades, suggesting gain and damping are poorly tuned.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The system alternates between inert stability and sudden cascades, suggesting gain and damping are poorly tuned.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The organization wants responsiveness, learning, exploration, or self-organization but cannot afford uncontrolled collapse or cascade.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: The organization wants responsiveness, learning, exploration, or self-organization but cannot afford uncontrolled collapse or cascade. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The organization wants responsiveness, learning, exploration, or self-organization but cannot afford uncontrolled collapse or cascade."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The organization wants responsiveness, learning, exploration, or self-organization but cannot afford uncontrolled collapse or cascade."}, {"display_text": "Managers, researchers, or operators are tempted to invoke the edge of chaos without specifying measurable boundaries or safety controls.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system is operating near a phase boundary where ordinary local, linear, or single-scale controls no longer describe its response. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Managers, researchers, or operators are tempted to invoke the edge of chaos without specifying measurable boundaries or safety controls. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Managers, researchers, or operators are tempted to invoke the edge of chaos without specifying measurable boundaries or safety controls.", "A system is operating near a phase boundary where ordinary local, linear, or single-scale controls no longer describe its response."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 8, "text": "Managers, researchers, or operators are tempted to invoke the edge of chaos without specifying measurable boundaries or safety controls."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 18, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-018", "ledger_sha256": "0d794f02665a559f09b3c1bfed372707fc938160005cbbe18fe35518203d143a"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Cross-Axis Product Space Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:cross_axis_product_space_design", "slug": "cross_axis_product_space_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A design, test, scenario, policy, configuration, or analysis space is governed through examples, anecdotes, or partial lists rather than through the full combination structure implied by its independent dimensions. As a result, important cells are never considered, impossible cells are treated as valid, coverage is overstated, interactions are missed, and later changes add or remove whole regions of possibility without review.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A design, test, scenario, policy, configuration, or analysis space is governed through examples, anecdotes, or partial lists rather than through the full combination structure implied by its independent dimensions. As a result, important cells are never considered, impossible cells are treated as valid, coverage is overstated, interactions are missed, and later changes add or remove whole regions of possibility without review."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires named dimensions and an ordered tuple selecting one value from each dimension.", "role_mapping": "Dimensions -> product axes; instance -> tuple; one value each -> coordinate assignment.", "slug": "cartesian_product", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime crosses multiple factors whose experimental instances assign one level per factor.", "role_mapping": "Dimensions -> factors; instance -> run; value -> factor level.", "slug": "factorial_design", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b018_a10_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A design, test, scenario, policy, configuration, or analysis space is governed through examples, anecdotes, or partial lists rather than through the full combination structure implied by its independent dimensions. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A decision space has multiple dimensions and each instance must choose one value on each dimension.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A decision space has multiple dimensions and each instance must choose one value on each dimension.", "A design, test, scenario, policy, configuration, or analysis space is governed through examples, anecdotes, or partial lists rather than through the full combination structure implied by its independent dimensions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Cartesian Product", "one_liner": "All combinations of independent dimensions, one choice per axis.", "page_ref": "prime:cartesian_product", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Dimensions -> product axes; instance -> tuple; one value each -> coordinate assignment.", "slug": "cartesian_product", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires named dimensions and an ordered tuple selecting one value from each dimension."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Factorial Design", "one_liner": "Multiple variables tested together.", "page_ref": "prime:factorial_design", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Dimensions -> factors; instance -> run; value -> factor level.", "slug": "factorial_design", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime crosses multiple factors whose experimental instances assign one level per factor."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A decision space has multiple dimensions and each instance must choose one value on each dimension.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime is the deliberate crossing of multiple factor-level combinations in a full or fractional factorial design.", "role_mapping": "Full factorial -> design form; combinations -> crossed factor levels.", "slug": "factorial_design", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b018_a10_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A design, test, scenario, policy, configuration, or analysis space is governed through examples, anecdotes, or partial lists rather than through the full combination structure implied by its independent dimensions. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A full factorial design, scenario cube, option matrix, configuration catalog, or combinatorial test plan is being created or maintained.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A full factorial design, scenario cube, option matrix, configuration catalog, or combinatorial test plan is being created or maintained.", "A design, test, scenario, policy, configuration, or analysis space is governed through examples, anecdotes, or partial lists rather than through the full combination structure implied by its independent dimensions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Factorial Design", "one_liner": "Multiple variables tested together.", "page_ref": "prime:factorial_design", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Full factorial -> design form; combinations -> crossed factor levels.", "slug": "factorial_design", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime is the deliberate crossing of multiple factor-level combinations in a full or fractional factorial design."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A full factorial design, scenario cube, option matrix, configuration catalog, or combinatorial test plan is being created or maintained.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A factorial design can be exploratory and need not support a coverage claim or contrast with a one-dimensional list.", "slug": "factorial_design"}], "residual_id": "r:cross_axis_product_space_design:b018_a10_c4", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b018_a10_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "As a result, important cells are never considered, impossible cells are treated as valid, coverage is overstated, interactions are missed, and later changes add or remove whole regions of possibility without review. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Coverage claims depend on cells that were generated from axis choices rather than on a simple one-dimensional list.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Coverage claims depend on cells that were generated from axis choices rather than on a simple one-dimensional list.", "As a result, important cells are never considered, impossible cells are treated as valid, coverage is overstated, interactions are missed, and later changes add or remove whole regions of possibility without review."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A factorial design can be exploratory and need not support a coverage claim or contrast with a one-dimensional list.", "slug": "factorial_design"}], "normalized_requirement": "Coverage claims depend on cells that were generated from axis choices rather than on a simple one-dimensional list.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Coverage claims depend on cells that were generated from axis choices rather than on a simple one-dimensional list.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P022-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve combinations or cells as the objects being screened.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Combinations in a product space are the evaluated objects.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the existential “some” rather than require all combinations to be excluded.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "At least some combinations have a listed exclusion property.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail an explicit filtering requirement, not optional informal omission.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Combinations with a listed exclusion property must be filtered explicitly.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires infeasibility as the filtering reason.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A combination is infeasible.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires safety risk as the filtering reason.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "A combination is unsafe.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires legal inadmissibility as the filtering reason.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "A combination is legally disallowed.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires semantic invalidity as the filtering reason.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "A combination is semantically invalid.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires redundancy as the filtering reason.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "A combination is redundant.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Some combinations are infeasible, unsafe, legally disallowed, semantically invalid, or redundant and must be filtered explicitly.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Some product-space combinations have a listed exclusion property and therefore require explicit filtering.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P022-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A Cartesian product can contain only feasible valid combinations and does not itself require filtering.", "slug": "cartesian_product"}], "residual_id": "r:cross_axis_product_space_design:b018_a10_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b018_a10_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Some combinations are infeasible, unsafe, legally disallowed, semantically invalid, or redundant and must be filtered explicitly. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Some combinations are infeasible, unsafe, legally disallowed, semantically invalid, or redundant and must be filtered explicitly."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A Cartesian product can contain only feasible valid combinations and does not itself require filtering.", "slug": "cartesian_product"}], "normalized_requirement": "Some combinations are infeasible, unsafe, legally disallowed, semantically invalid, or redundant and must be filtered explicitly.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Some combinations are infeasible, unsafe, legally disallowed, semantically invalid, or redundant and must be filtered explicitly.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P022-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5", "O6", "O9"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5", "O7", "O9"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5", "O8", "O9"], ["O1", "O2", "O4", "O5", "O6", "O9"], ["O1", "O2", "O4", "O5", "O7", "O9"], ["O1", "O2", "O4", "O5", "O8", "O9"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the combinatorial product space as the focal object.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A product space is the object whose size is assessed.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require size beyond exhaustive capacity, not merely a large but tractable space.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The product space is too large for exhaustive handling.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This handling branch requires inability to test the full space.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Exhaustive testing is infeasible because of the product-space size.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This handling branch requires inability to implement the full space.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Exhaustive implementation is infeasible because of the product-space size.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve both the requirement and visibility of the rule.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The governing choice rule must be visible.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This rule branch requires reduction as the governing choice operation.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The visible rule is a reduction rule.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This rule branch requires sampling as the governing choice operation.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The visible rule is a sampling rule.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This rule branch requires prioritization as the governing choice operation.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The visible rule is a prioritization rule.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the consequential link from size-caused exhaustive infeasibility to the requirement that the governing choice rule be visible.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "The product-space size and resulting exhaustive-handling infeasibility are why the governing rule must be visible.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "The product space is too large to exhaustively test or implement, so the reduction, sampling, or prioritization rule must be visible.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An inexhaustibly large product space requires a visible reduction, sampling, or prioritization rule.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P022-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A small factorial design can be exhaustively run and need not require reduction or prioritization.", "slug": "factorial_design"}], "residual_id": "r:cross_axis_product_space_design:b018_a10_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b018_a10_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A design, test, scenario, policy, configuration, or analysis space is governed through examples, anecdotes, or partial lists rather than through the full combination structure implied by its independent dimensions. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The product space is too large to exhaustively test or implement, so the reduction, sampling, or prioritization rule must be visible.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The product space is too large to exhaustively test or implement, so the reduction, sampling, or prioritization rule must be visible.", "A design, test, scenario, policy, configuration, or analysis space is governed through examples, anecdotes, or partial lists rather than through the full combination structure implied by its independent dimensions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A small factorial design can be exhaustively run and need not require reduction or prioritization.", "slug": "factorial_design"}], "normalized_requirement": "The product space is too large to exhaustively test or implement, so the reduction, sampling, or prioritization rule must be visible.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The product space is too large to exhaustively test or implement, so the reduction, sampling, or prioritization rule must be visible.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's cardinality is multiplicative across dimension sizes, so adding an axis or level expands the configuration space multiplicatively.", "role_mapping": "Axis/level -> dimension/value; multiplies -> product cardinality.", "slug": "cartesian_product", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "Full factorial run count grows combinatorially when a factor or level is added.", "role_mapping": "Axis/level -> factor/level; space -> crossed runs; multiplies -> combinatorial growth.", "slug": "factorial_design", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b018_a10_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The same structure that prevents blind spots can create combinatorial overload unless the design distinguishes independent axes, valid levels, infeasible cells, sampling rules, and coverage obligations. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Adding one new axis or level multiplies the space and can invalidate prior coverage, capacity, or risk assumptions.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Adding one new axis or level multiplies the space and can invalidate prior coverage, capacity, or risk assumptions.", "The same structure that prevents blind spots can create combinatorial overload unless the design distinguishes independent axes, valid levels, infeasible cells, sampling rules, and coverage obligations."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Cartesian Product", "one_liner": "All combinations of independent dimensions, one choice per axis.", "page_ref": "prime:cartesian_product", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Axis/level -> dimension/value; multiplies -> product cardinality.", "slug": "cartesian_product", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's cardinality is multiplicative across dimension sizes, so adding an axis or level expands the configuration space multiplicatively."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Factorial Design", "one_liner": "Multiple variables tested together.", "page_ref": "prime:factorial_design", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Axis/level -> factor/level; space -> crossed runs; multiplies -> combinatorial growth.", "slug": "factorial_design", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Full factorial run count grows combinatorially when a factor or level is added."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Adding one new axis or level multiplies the space and can invalidate prior coverage, capacity, or risk assumptions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A team needs to know whether all configurations, scenarios, customer segments, factor combinations, permission bundles, or test conditions have been considered.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A design, test, scenario, policy, configuration, or analysis space is governed through examples, anecdotes, or partial lists rather than through the full combination structure implied by its independent dimensions. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: A team needs to know whether all configurations, scenarios, customer segments, factor combinations, permission bundles, or test conditions have been considered. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A team needs to know whether all configurations, scenarios, customer segments, factor combinations, permission bundles, or test conditions have been considered.", "A design, test, scenario, policy, configuration, or analysis space is governed through examples, anecdotes, or partial lists rather than through the full combination structure implied by its independent dimensions."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "A team needs to know whether all configurations, scenarios, customer segments, factor combinations, permission bundles, or test conditions have been considered."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 18, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-018", "ledger_sha256": "0d794f02665a559f09b3c1bfed372707fc938160005cbbe18fe35518203d143a"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Cross-Cultural Perspective Training", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:cross_cultural_perspective_training", "slug": "cross_cultural_perspective_training"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 7, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 7, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 8 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 7 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 8}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A person, team, or institution interprets another cultural setting through its own unexamined categories, norms, and success criteria. The home frame is treated as neutral or universal, so differences appear irrational, deficient, exotic, backward, unprofessional, or morally simple before they are understood in local terms.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A person, team, or institution interprets another cultural setting through its own unexamined categories, norms, and success criteria. The home frame is treated as neutral or universal, so differences appear irrational, deficient, exotic, backward, unprofessional, or morally simple before they are understood in local terms."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P022-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O9"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O10"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O11"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve people or equivalent human collectives as the actors.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "People are the actors performing the cross-cultural work.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve groups, not abstract cultural content alone, as the acted-with or acted-for role.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Groups are the objects of the cross-cultural work.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve both the cross-group difference and the actors’ own frame as comparator.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The groups’ norms and self-understandings differ from those of the actors.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the necessity expressed by “must.”", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The actors must perform at least one listed action toward the groups.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires interpret as the cross-cultural action.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The required action is to interpret the culturally different groups.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires design for as the cross-cultural action.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The required action is to design for the culturally different groups.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires negotiate with as the cross-cultural action.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The required action is to negotiate with the culturally different groups.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires teach as the cross-cultural action.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The required action is to teach the culturally different groups.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires govern as the cross-cultural action.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "The required action is to govern the culturally different groups.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires serve as the cross-cultural action.", "obligation_id": "O10", "statement": "The required action is to serve the culturally different groups.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires evaluate as the cross-cultural action.", "obligation_id": "O11", "statement": "The required action is to evaluate the culturally different groups.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "People must interpret, design for, negotiate with, teach, govern, serve, or evaluate groups whose norms and self-understandings differ from their own.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "People must perform at least one listed action with or for groups whose norms and self-understandings differ from their own.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P022-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Enculturation describes acquisition of one's own culture and does not require cross-cultural work with differently situated groups.", "slug": "enculturation"}], "residual_id": "r:cross_cultural_perspective_training:b018_a11_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b018_a11_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A person, team, or institution interprets another cultural setting through its own unexamined categories, norms, and success criteria. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: People must interpret, design for, negotiate with, teach, govern, serve, or evaluate groups whose norms and self-understandings differ from their own.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["People must interpret, design for, negotiate with, teach, govern, serve, or evaluate groups whose norms and self-understandings differ from their own.", "A person, team, or institution interprets another cultural setting through its own unexamined categories, norms, and success criteria."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Enculturation describes acquisition of one's own culture and does not require cross-cultural work with differently situated groups.", "slug": "enculturation"}], "normalized_requirement": "People must interpret, design for, negotiate with, teach, govern, serve, or evaluate groups whose norms and self-understandings differ from their own.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "People must interpret, design for, negotiate with, teach, govern, serve, or evaluate groups whose norms and self-understandings differ from their own.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P022-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a team or equivalent collective interpreter.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A team is the actor that interprets behavior.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require recurrent misinterpretation, not one isolated mistake.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The team misreads behavior repeatedly.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the causal direction from assumed universality to misreading.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The team’s universality assumption causes the repeated misreading.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the team’s own categories as the falsely universalized baseline.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The universalized categories belong to the team’s own cultural frame.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail a belief or assumption of universality, not objective universality.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The team assumes its categories are universal.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve observed behavior as the target of the recurrent misinterpretation.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "Behavior is the object being misread.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}], "predicate": "A team repeatedly misreads behavior because it assumes its own categories of time, hierarchy, family, obligation, honor, privacy, professionalism, learning, risk, or fairness are universal.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A team repeatedly misreads behavior because it universalizes categories from its own cultural frame.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P022-C13-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The attribution error overweights disposition relative to situation but does not require universalizing one's cultural categories, a team, or repeated misreading.", "slug": "fundamental_attribution_error"}], "residual_id": "r:cross_cultural_perspective_training:b018_a11_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b018_a11_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A person, team, or institution interprets another cultural setting through its own unexamined categories, norms, and success criteria. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A team repeatedly misreads behavior because it assumes its own categories of time, hierarchy, family, obligation, honor, privacy, professionalism, learning, risk, or fairness are universal.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A team repeatedly misreads behavior because it assumes its own categories of time, hierarchy, family, obligation, honor, privacy, professionalism, learning, risk, or fairness are universal.", "A person, team, or institution interprets another cultural setting through its own unexamined categories, norms, and success criteria."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The attribution error overweights disposition relative to situation but does not require universalizing one's cultural categories, a team, or repeated misreading.", "slug": "fundamental_attribution_error"}], "normalized_requirement": "A team repeatedly misreads behavior because it assumes its own categories of time, hierarchy, family, obligation, honor, privacy, professionalism, learning, risk, or fairness are universal.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A team repeatedly misreads behavior because it assumes its own categories of time, hierarchy, family, obligation, honor, privacy, professionalism, learning, risk, or fairness are universal.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P022-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O9"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O10"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O11"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve people or equivalent human collectives as the actors.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "People are the actors performing the cross-cultural work.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve groups, not abstract cultural content alone, as the acted-with or acted-for role.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Groups are the objects of the cross-cultural work.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve both the cross-group difference and the actors’ own frame as comparator.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The groups’ norms and self-understandings differ from those of the actors.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the necessity expressed by “must.”", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The actors must perform at least one listed action toward the groups.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires interpret as the cross-cultural action.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The required action is to interpret the culturally different groups.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires design for as the cross-cultural action.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The required action is to design for the culturally different groups.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires negotiate with as the cross-cultural action.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The required action is to negotiate with the culturally different groups.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires teach as the cross-cultural action.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The required action is to teach the culturally different groups.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires govern as the cross-cultural action.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "The required action is to govern the culturally different groups.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires serve as the cross-cultural action.", "obligation_id": "O10", "statement": "The required action is to serve the culturally different groups.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires evaluate as the cross-cultural action.", "obligation_id": "O11", "statement": "The required action is to evaluate the culturally different groups.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "People must interpret, design for, negotiate with, teach, govern, serve, or evaluate groups whose norms and self-understandings differ from their own.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "People must perform at least one listed action with or for groups whose norms and self-understandings differ from their own.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P022-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Enculturation describes acquisition of one's own culture and does not require cross-cultural work with differently situated groups.", "slug": "enculturation"}], "residual_id": "r:cross_cultural_perspective_training:b018_a11_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b018_a11_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A person, team, or institution interprets another cultural setting through its own unexamined categories, norms, and success criteria. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: People must interpret, design for, negotiate with, teach, govern, serve, or evaluate groups whose norms and self-understandings differ from their own.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["People must interpret, design for, negotiate with, teach, govern, serve, or evaluate groups whose norms and self-understandings differ from their own.", "A person, team, or institution interprets another cultural setting through its own unexamined categories, norms, and success criteria."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Enculturation describes acquisition of one's own culture and does not require cross-cultural work with differently situated groups.", "slug": "enculturation"}], "normalized_requirement": "People must interpret, design for, negotiate with, teach, govern, serve, or evaluate groups whose norms and self-understandings differ from their own.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "People must interpret, design for, negotiate with, teach, govern, serve, or evaluate groups whose norms and self-understandings differ from their own.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P022-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an institutional artifact or practice, such as the listed manifestations, as the object being transported.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An institutional artifact or practice is the transported object.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail directed cross-context transport or transfer, not mere similarity across settings.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The institutional artifact or practice is transported from one context into another.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a destination cultural context distinct from the source context.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The destination is another cultural context.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the actuality expressed by “is being transported.”", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The transport is occurring rather than merely proposed as possible.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "Training, policy, product design, research, or service delivery is being transported into another cultural context.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A listed institutional artifact or practice is being transported into another cultural context.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P022-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Transfer of learning concerns applying acquired knowledge and need not transport an institutional artifact into another culture.", "slug": "transfer_of_learning"}], "residual_id": "r:cross_cultural_perspective_training:b018_a11_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b018_a11_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A person, team, or institution interprets another cultural setting through its own unexamined categories, norms, and success criteria. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Training, policy, product design, research, or service delivery is being transported into another cultural context.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Training, policy, product design, research, or service delivery is being transported into another cultural context.", "A person, team, or institution interprets another cultural setting through its own unexamined categories, norms, and success criteria."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "I attempted to preserve the candidate and the one stated qualifier while falsifying the selected DNF branch; no such instance remains because the qualifier binds exactly O1 and all other branch obligations are directly entailed.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Intercultural Communication", "one_liner": "The field and practice of managing communicative exchange between parties operating from distinct cultural frames, diagnosing where the same surface utterance carries different presuppositions and repairing the gap below the words that translation alone cannot close.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:intercultural_communication", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "shared_form_is_institutional_artifact_or_practice", "predicate": "the shared document or communicative practice is an institutional artifact or practice", "rationale": "The exact record supplies the principal roles and relation family, while one candidate-anchored atomic context fact fills the only gap in the selected complete DNF branch."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "intercultural_communication"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "shared_form_is_institutional_artifact_or_practice"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "intercultural_communication", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P022-C14-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record preserves the unit's principal roles and relation family, and one atomic candidate-anchored context fact fills the only gap in a complete DNF branch."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Training, policy, product design, research, or service delivery is being transported into another cultural context.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P022-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O9"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O10"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O11"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve people or equivalent human collectives as the actors.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "People are the actors performing the cross-cultural work.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve groups, not abstract cultural content alone, as the acted-with or acted-for role.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Groups are the objects of the cross-cultural work.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve both the cross-group difference and the actors’ own frame as comparator.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The groups’ norms and self-understandings differ from those of the actors.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the necessity expressed by “must.”", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The actors must perform at least one listed action toward the groups.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires interpret as the cross-cultural action.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The required action is to interpret the culturally different groups.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires design for as the cross-cultural action.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The required action is to design for the culturally different groups.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires negotiate with as the cross-cultural action.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The required action is to negotiate with the culturally different groups.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires teach as the cross-cultural action.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The required action is to teach the culturally different groups.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires govern as the cross-cultural action.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "The required action is to govern the culturally different groups.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires serve as the cross-cultural action.", "obligation_id": "O10", "statement": "The required action is to serve the culturally different groups.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires evaluate as the cross-cultural action.", "obligation_id": "O11", "statement": "The required action is to evaluate the culturally different groups.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "People must interpret, design for, negotiate with, teach, govern, serve, or evaluate groups whose norms and self-understandings differ from their own.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "People must perform at least one listed action with or for groups whose norms and self-understandings differ from their own.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P022-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Enculturation describes acquisition of one's own culture and does not require cross-cultural work with differently situated groups.", "slug": "enculturation"}], "residual_id": "r:cross_cultural_perspective_training:b018_a11_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b018_a11_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A person, team, or institution interprets another cultural setting through its own unexamined categories, norms, and success criteria. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: People must interpret, design for, negotiate with, teach, govern, serve, or evaluate groups whose norms and self-understandings differ from their own.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["People must interpret, design for, negotiate with, teach, govern, serve, or evaluate groups whose norms and self-understandings differ from their own.", "A person, team, or institution interprets another cultural setting through its own unexamined categories, norms, and success criteria."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Enculturation describes acquisition of one's own culture and does not require cross-cultural work with differently situated groups.", "slug": "enculturation"}], "normalized_requirement": "People must interpret, design for, negotiate with, teach, govern, serve, or evaluate groups whose norms and self-understandings differ from their own.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "People must interpret, design for, negotiate with, teach, govern, serve, or evaluate groups whose norms and self-understandings differ from their own.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Ethnocentrism need not produce any reported encounter or the listed judgments about outsiders.", "slug": "ethnocentrism"}], "residual_id": "r:cross_cultural_perspective_training:b018_a11_c4", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b018_a11_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Participants describe outsiders as dismissive, extractive, condescending, naïve, insensitive, or unable to understand local constraints. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Participants describe outsiders as dismissive, extractive, condescending, naïve, insensitive, or unable to understand local constraints."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Ethnocentrism need not produce any reported encounter or the listed judgments about outsiders.", "slug": "ethnocentrism"}], "normalized_requirement": "Participants describe outsiders as dismissive, extractive, condescending, naïve, insensitive, or unable to understand local constraints.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Participants describe outsiders as dismissive, extractive, condescending, naïve, insensitive, or unable to understand local constraints.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P022-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O9"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O10"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O11"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve people or equivalent human collectives as the actors.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "People are the actors performing the cross-cultural work.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve groups, not abstract cultural content alone, as the acted-with or acted-for role.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Groups are the objects of the cross-cultural work.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve both the cross-group difference and the actors’ own frame as comparator.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The groups’ norms and self-understandings differ from those of the actors.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the necessity expressed by “must.”", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The actors must perform at least one listed action toward the groups.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires interpret as the cross-cultural action.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The required action is to interpret the culturally different groups.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires design for as the cross-cultural action.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The required action is to design for the culturally different groups.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires negotiate with as the cross-cultural action.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The required action is to negotiate with the culturally different groups.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires teach as the cross-cultural action.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The required action is to teach the culturally different groups.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires govern as the cross-cultural action.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "The required action is to govern the culturally different groups.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires serve as the cross-cultural action.", "obligation_id": "O10", "statement": "The required action is to serve the culturally different groups.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires evaluate as the cross-cultural action.", "obligation_id": "O11", "statement": "The required action is to evaluate the culturally different groups.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "People must interpret, design for, negotiate with, teach, govern, serve, or evaluate groups whose norms and self-understandings differ from their own.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "People must perform at least one listed action with or for groups whose norms and self-understandings differ from their own.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P022-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Enculturation describes acquisition of one's own culture and does not require cross-cultural work with differently situated groups.", "slug": "enculturation"}], "residual_id": "r:cross_cultural_perspective_training:b018_a11_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b018_a11_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A person, team, or institution interprets another cultural setting through its own unexamined categories, norms, and success criteria. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: People must interpret, design for, negotiate with, teach, govern, serve, or evaluate groups whose norms and self-understandings differ from their own.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["People must interpret, design for, negotiate with, teach, govern, serve, or evaluate groups whose norms and self-understandings differ from their own.", "A person, team, or institution interprets another cultural setting through its own unexamined categories, norms, and success criteria."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Enculturation describes acquisition of one's own culture and does not require cross-cultural work with differently situated groups.", "slug": "enculturation"}], "normalized_requirement": "People must interpret, design for, negotiate with, teach, govern, serve, or evaluate groups whose norms and self-understandings differ from their own.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "People must interpret, design for, negotiate with, teach, govern, serve, or evaluate groups whose norms and self-understandings differ from their own.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P022-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the dominant institutional culture as the evaluating role.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A dominant institutional culture is the evaluator.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve culturally other groups as the evaluated objects.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Other groups are the objects being evaluated.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail deviation-framing, not mere recognition of difference.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The dominant culture evaluates the other groups as deviations.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the evaluator’s own defaults as the standard against which deviation is judged.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The dominant culture’s own defaults are the comparison baseline.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "A dominant institutional culture evaluates other groups as deviations from its own procedural, communicative, or moral defaults.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A dominant institutional culture evaluates other groups as deviations from its own defaults.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P022-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Cultural hegemony can naturalize a dominant worldview without explicitly evaluating other cultural groups as deviations.", "slug": "cultural_hegemony"}], "residual_id": "r:cross_cultural_perspective_training:b018_a11_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b018_a11_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A dominant institutional culture evaluates other groups as deviations from its own procedural, communicative, or moral defaults. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A dominant institutional culture evaluates other groups as deviations from its own procedural, communicative, or moral defaults."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Cultural hegemony can naturalize a dominant worldview without explicitly evaluating other cultural groups as deviations.", "slug": "cultural_hegemony"}], "normalized_requirement": "A dominant institutional culture evaluates other groups as deviations from its own procedural, communicative, or moral defaults.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A dominant institutional culture evaluates other groups as deviations from its own procedural, communicative, or moral defaults.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B5", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P022-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O9"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O10"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O11"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve people or equivalent human collectives as the actors.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "People are the actors performing the cross-cultural work.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve groups, not abstract cultural content alone, as the acted-with or acted-for role.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Groups are the objects of the cross-cultural work.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve both the cross-group difference and the actors’ own frame as comparator.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The groups’ norms and self-understandings differ from those of the actors.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the necessity expressed by “must.”", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The actors must perform at least one listed action toward the groups.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires interpret as the cross-cultural action.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The required action is to interpret the culturally different groups.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires design for as the cross-cultural action.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The required action is to design for the culturally different groups.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires negotiate with as the cross-cultural action.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The required action is to negotiate with the culturally different groups.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires teach as the cross-cultural action.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The required action is to teach the culturally different groups.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires govern as the cross-cultural action.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "The required action is to govern the culturally different groups.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires serve as the cross-cultural action.", "obligation_id": "O10", "statement": "The required action is to serve the culturally different groups.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires evaluate as the cross-cultural action.", "obligation_id": "O11", "statement": "The required action is to evaluate the culturally different groups.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "People must interpret, design for, negotiate with, teach, govern, serve, or evaluate groups whose norms and self-understandings differ from their own.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "People must perform at least one listed action with or for groups whose norms and self-understandings differ from their own.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P022-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Enculturation describes acquisition of one's own culture and does not require cross-cultural work with differently situated groups.", "slug": "enculturation"}], "residual_id": "r:cross_cultural_perspective_training:b018_a11_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b018_a11_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A person, team, or institution interprets another cultural setting through its own unexamined categories, norms, and success criteria. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: People must interpret, design for, negotiate with, teach, govern, serve, or evaluate groups whose norms and self-understandings differ from their own.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["People must interpret, design for, negotiate with, teach, govern, serve, or evaluate groups whose norms and self-understandings differ from their own.", "A person, team, or institution interprets another cultural setting through its own unexamined categories, norms, and success criteria."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Enculturation describes acquisition of one's own culture and does not require cross-cultural work with differently situated groups.", "slug": "enculturation"}], "normalized_requirement": "People must interpret, design for, negotiate with, teach, govern, serve, or evaluate groups whose norms and self-understandings differ from their own.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "People must interpret, design for, negotiate with, teach, govern, serve, or evaluate groups whose norms and self-understandings differ from their own.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P023-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must contain learners or equivalent knowledge holders and a cultural context as the object of learning.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Learners are engaging with knowledge about a culture.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail factual-recall capability, not merely exposure to cultural facts.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The learners are able to recite facts about that culture.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve insiders' self-understanding of their actions, not a generic explanation of cultural facts.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "People inside the cultural context and their own actions are the object of the missing explanation.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require absence of emic explanatory ability, not merely a less detailed explanation.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The learners cannot explain how those insiders understand their own actions.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the within-case competence asymmetry rather than supply either capacity in isolation.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Factual recall is present while emic explanatory understanding is absent for the same learners and culture.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Learners can recite facts about a culture but cannot explain how people inside that context understand their own actions.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Learners have factual cultural recall without emic explanatory understanding.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P023-C01-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Emic and etic perspectives can both be competently represented and do not entail a learner's fact-recall failure.", "slug": "emic_and_etic"}], "residual_id": "r:cross_cultural_perspective_training:b018_a11_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b018_a11_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The archetype manages this tension by separating understanding, comparison, and action while requiring each to be explicit. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Learners can recite facts about a culture but cannot explain how people inside that context understand their own actions.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Learners can recite facts about a culture but cannot explain how people inside that context understand their own actions.", "The archetype manages this tension by separating understanding, comparison, and action while requiring each to be explicit."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Emic and etic perspectives can both be competently represented and do not entail a learner's fact-recall failure.", "slug": "emic_and_etic"}], "normalized_requirement": "Learners can recite facts about a culture but cannot explain how people inside that context understand their own actions.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Learners can recite facts about a culture but cannot explain how people inside that context understand their own actions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 5", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B6", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P022-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O9"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O10"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O11"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve people or equivalent human collectives as the actors.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "People are the actors performing the cross-cultural work.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve groups, not abstract cultural content alone, as the acted-with or acted-for role.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Groups are the objects of the cross-cultural work.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve both the cross-group difference and the actors’ own frame as comparator.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The groups’ norms and self-understandings differ from those of the actors.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the necessity expressed by “must.”", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The actors must perform at least one listed action toward the groups.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires interpret as the cross-cultural action.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The required action is to interpret the culturally different groups.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires design for as the cross-cultural action.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The required action is to design for the culturally different groups.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires negotiate with as the cross-cultural action.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The required action is to negotiate with the culturally different groups.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires teach as the cross-cultural action.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The required action is to teach the culturally different groups.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires govern as the cross-cultural action.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "The required action is to govern the culturally different groups.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires serve as the cross-cultural action.", "obligation_id": "O10", "statement": "The required action is to serve the culturally different groups.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires evaluate as the cross-cultural action.", "obligation_id": "O11", "statement": "The required action is to evaluate the culturally different groups.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "People must interpret, design for, negotiate with, teach, govern, serve, or evaluate groups whose norms and self-understandings differ from their own.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "People must perform at least one listed action with or for groups whose norms and self-understandings differ from their own.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P022-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Enculturation describes acquisition of one's own culture and does not require cross-cultural work with differently situated groups.", "slug": "enculturation"}], "residual_id": "r:cross_cultural_perspective_training:b018_a11_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b018_a11_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A person, team, or institution interprets another cultural setting through its own unexamined categories, norms, and success criteria. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: People must interpret, design for, negotiate with, teach, govern, serve, or evaluate groups whose norms and self-understandings differ from their own.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["People must interpret, design for, negotiate with, teach, govern, serve, or evaluate groups whose norms and self-understandings differ from their own.", "A person, team, or institution interprets another cultural setting through its own unexamined categories, norms, and success criteria."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Enculturation describes acquisition of one's own culture and does not require cross-cultural work with differently situated groups.", "slug": "enculturation"}], "normalized_requirement": "People must interpret, design for, negotiate with, teach, govern, serve, or evaluate groups whose norms and self-understandings differ from their own.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "People must interpret, design for, negotiate with, teach, govern, serve, or evaluate groups whose norms and self-understandings differ from their own.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P023-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern a conflict across cultural contexts, not a generic interpersonal disagreement.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A cross-cultural conflict is the event being explained.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve explanation of the conflict through the selected attribution, not mere mention of that trait.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The conflict is being explained by attributing it to the selected deficit framing.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must make the framing primary rather than incidental or one minor contributor among many.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The selected deficit framing supplies the main or predominant explanation.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires personality defects to be the predominant explanatory attribution.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A complete explanation branch attributes the conflict to personality defects.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires irrationality to be the predominant explanatory attribution.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "A complete explanation branch attributes the conflict to irrationality.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires stereotypes to be the predominant explanatory attribution.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "A complete explanation branch attributes the conflict to stereotypes.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A cross-cultural conflict is being explained mainly through personality defects, irrationality, or stereotypes.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A cross-cultural conflict is explained primarily through one listed deficit framing.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P023-C02-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Stereotyping can occur outside a cross-cultural conflict and need not be the main explanatory frame for a conflict.", "slug": "stereotyping"}], "residual_id": "r:cross_cultural_perspective_training:b018_a11_c7", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b018_a11_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A cross-cultural conflict is being explained mainly through personality defects, irrationality, or stereotypes. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A cross-cultural conflict is being explained mainly through personality defects, irrationality, or stereotypes."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Stereotyping can occur outside a cross-cultural conflict and need not be the main explanatory frame for a conflict.", "slug": "stereotyping"}], "normalized_requirement": "A cross-cultural conflict is being explained mainly through personality defects, irrationality, or stereotypes.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A cross-cultural conflict is being explained mainly through personality defects, irrationality, or stereotypes.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 6", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B7", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P022-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O9"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O10"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O11"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve people or equivalent human collectives as the actors.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "People are the actors performing the cross-cultural work.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve groups, not abstract cultural content alone, as the acted-with or acted-for role.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Groups are the objects of the cross-cultural work.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve both the cross-group difference and the actors’ own frame as comparator.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The groups’ norms and self-understandings differ from those of the actors.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the necessity expressed by “must.”", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The actors must perform at least one listed action toward the groups.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires interpret as the cross-cultural action.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The required action is to interpret the culturally different groups.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires design for as the cross-cultural action.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The required action is to design for the culturally different groups.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires negotiate with as the cross-cultural action.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The required action is to negotiate with the culturally different groups.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires teach as the cross-cultural action.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The required action is to teach the culturally different groups.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires govern as the cross-cultural action.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "The required action is to govern the culturally different groups.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires serve as the cross-cultural action.", "obligation_id": "O10", "statement": "The required action is to serve the culturally different groups.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires evaluate as the cross-cultural action.", "obligation_id": "O11", "statement": "The required action is to evaluate the culturally different groups.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "People must interpret, design for, negotiate with, teach, govern, serve, or evaluate groups whose norms and self-understandings differ from their own.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "People must perform at least one listed action with or for groups whose norms and self-understandings differ from their own.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P022-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Enculturation describes acquisition of one's own culture and does not require cross-cultural work with differently situated groups.", "slug": "enculturation"}], "residual_id": "r:cross_cultural_perspective_training:b018_a11_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b018_a11_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A person, team, or institution interprets another cultural setting through its own unexamined categories, norms, and success criteria. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: People must interpret, design for, negotiate with, teach, govern, serve, or evaluate groups whose norms and self-understandings differ from their own.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["People must interpret, design for, negotiate with, teach, govern, serve, or evaluate groups whose norms and self-understandings differ from their own.", "A person, team, or institution interprets another cultural setting through its own unexamined categories, norms, and success criteria."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Enculturation describes acquisition of one's own culture and does not require cross-cultural work with differently situated groups.", "slug": "enculturation"}], "normalized_requirement": "People must interpret, design for, negotiate with, teach, govern, serve, or evaluate groups whose norms and self-understandings differ from their own.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "People must interpret, design for, negotiate with, teach, govern, serve, or evaluate groups whose norms and self-understandings differ from their own.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P023-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must contain a decision and its framing structure, not an unrelated policy artifact.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "One or more decisions are framed or made.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a projected effect on the people rather than only possible relevance.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The decisions will affect a set of people.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must map the affected people to the group whose participation in framing is at issue.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The people affected by the decisions are the participation-bearing group.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail absence of their voice from frame formation, not merely limited influence after the decision.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The affected people's voices have not shaped the decision frame.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must separately preserve absence of their categories, not infer it from voice exclusion alone.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The affected people's interpretive categories have not shaped the decision frame.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve identity between the excluded and affected group rather than combine evidence about different groups.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The people excluded from frame formation are the same people the decisions will affect.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Decisions will affect people whose voices and interpretive categories have not shaped the decision frame.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "People affected by a future decision have contributed neither their voices nor their interpretive categories to its frame.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P023-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Recognition justice can be satisfied, and its violation need not concern interpretive categories shaping a decision frame.", "slug": "recognition_justice"}], "residual_id": "r:cross_cultural_perspective_training:b018_a11_c8", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b018_a11_c8", "explanation": {"paragraph": "People need workable judgments and decisions, but their available categories are culturally formed. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Decisions will affect people whose voices and interpretive categories have not shaped the decision frame.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Decisions will affect people whose voices and interpretive categories have not shaped the decision frame.", "People need workable judgments and decisions, but their available categories are culturally formed."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Recognition justice can be satisfied, and its violation need not concern interpretive categories shaping a decision frame.", "slug": "recognition_justice"}], "normalized_requirement": "Decisions will affect people whose voices and interpretive categories have not shaped the decision frame.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Decisions will affect people whose voices and interpretive categories have not shaped the decision frame.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [8], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 7", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 18, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-018", "ledger_sha256": "0d794f02665a559f09b3c1bfed372707fc938160005cbbe18fe35518203d143a"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Cross-Impact Interaction Mapping", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:cross_impact_interaction_mapping", "slug": "cross_impact_interaction_mapping"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 4, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 4 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is independence bias in futures reasoning. A system simplifies the future by listing drivers one by one, ranking them separately, or placing them into scenarios as if each evolves on its own. That simplification hides coupling. One driver may accelerate another, absorb it, change its timing, make it socially unacceptable, unlock an enabling condition, or turn an ordinary risk into a compound risk.\n\nThe symptom is often a polished trend report or risk matrix that still leaves decision makers surprised when known drivers combine in unexpected ways. The future did not come from nowhere; the relation among known drivers was missing.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A strategy treats trends, events, risks, or uncertainties as independent inputs even though they may amplify, suppress, enable, delay, or transform each other."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P023-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern a foresight or equivalent future-oriented analysis process.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A foresight process is the analyzing process.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail completed driver identification, not only a plan to search for drivers.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The process has identified a set of drivers.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require multiple drivers and cannot be satisfied by one driver alone.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The identified set contains several drivers.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve their load-bearing importance rather than any incidental variable list.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The identified drivers are important to the foresight analysis.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail absence of interaction analysis for the same driver set.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The process has not examined how the identified drivers interact.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "A foresight process has identified several important drivers but has not examined how they interact.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A foresight process identifies several important drivers without examining their interactions.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P023-C04-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Cross-impact analysis is the apparatus that examines interactions and need not be preceded by an unexamined driver list.", "slug": "cross_impact_analysis"}], "residual_id": "r:cross_impact_interaction_mapping:b018_a12_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b018_a12_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is not necessary when there is only one important driver, when a simple trend scan is enough, or when the task is to select robust actions across already coherent scenarios. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A foresight process has identified several important drivers but has not examined how they interact.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A foresight process has identified several important drivers but has not examined how they interact.", "It is not necessary when there is only one important driver, when a simple trend scan is enough, or when the task is to select robust actions across already coherent scenarios."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Cross-impact analysis is the apparatus that examines interactions and need not be preceded by an unexamined driver list.", "slug": "cross_impact_analysis"}], "normalized_requirement": "A foresight process has identified several important drivers but has not examined how they interact.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A foresight process has identified several important drivers but has not examined how they interact.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P023-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must contain multiple assumptions belonging to one scenario or scenario set.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Two or more scenario assumptions are under consideration.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must type the inconsistent items as assumptions used in scenarios, not arbitrary statements.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The related propositions are scenario assumptions.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve apparent inconsistency rather than require conclusive proof of contradiction.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The assumptions appear to have the stated defect.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail incompatibility within the assumption set, not an external mismatch alone.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The scenario assumptions are internally inconsistent with one another.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Scenario assumptions appear internally inconsistent.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Scenario assumptions appear internally inconsistent.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P023-C05-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P023-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must contain multiple assumptions among which dependence could obtain.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Two or more scenario assumptions are under consideration.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must type the items as assumptions used in a scenario, not arbitrary independent variables.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The related propositions are scenario assumptions.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the source's appearance modality and not require a proven dependence error.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The assumptions appear to have the stated defect.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail an independence representation among the assumptions.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The scenario assumptions are represented or treated as independent.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve excessive or unwarranted independence, not merely legitimate separability.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The represented independence is greater than the situation warrants.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Scenario assumptions appear overly independent.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Scenario assumptions appear to be modeled as more independent than warranted.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P023-C05-U2"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Cross-impact analysis can map a consistent scenario set and does not entail prior inconsistency or independence error.", "slug": "cross_impact_analysis"}], "residual_id": "r:cross_impact_interaction_mapping:b018_a12_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b018_a12_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Scenario assumptions appear internally inconsistent or overly independent. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Scenario assumptions appear internally inconsistent or overly independent."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 2, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 2}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Cross-impact analysis can map a consistent scenario set and does not entail prior inconsistency or independence error.", "slug": "cross_impact_analysis"}], "normalized_requirement": "Scenario assumptions appear internally inconsistent or overly independent.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 2 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Scenario assumptions appear internally inconsistent or overly independent.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P023-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O5", "O6", "O7", "O9"], ["O1", "O2", "O5", "O6", "O8", "O9"], ["O1", "O3", "O5", "O6", "O7", "O9"], ["O1", "O3", "O5", "O6", "O8", "O9"], ["O1", "O4", "O5", "O6", "O7", "O9"], ["O1", "O4", "O5", "O6", "O8", "O9"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must contain at least two items whose comparative ranking can ignore interaction.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Multiple driver items are being ranked.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires risks to be among the items ranked one by one.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A complete ranked-object branch consists of risks.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires opportunities to be among the items ranked one by one.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A complete ranked-object branch consists of opportunities.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires external changes to be among the items ranked one by one.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A complete ranked-object branch consists of external changes.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail separate itemwise ranking, not merely a list produced after joint analysis.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The driver items are ranked one by one rather than through their joint effects.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve plausible interaction rather than require a proven realized effect.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "Interaction among the ranked drivers could plausibly have the selected effect.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a plausible amplifying or compounding effect among the same drivers.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "A complete effect branch is compounding among the ranked drivers.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a plausible suppressing or offsetting effect among the same drivers.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "A complete effect branch is offsetting among the ranked drivers.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must link the separate ranking and ignored interaction rather than combine unrelated ranking and interaction facts.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "The one-by-one ranking persists despite the plausible interaction effect among those drivers.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Risks, opportunities, or external changes are being ranked one by one despite plausible compounding or offsetting effects.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Drivers are ranked one by one despite plausible compounding or offsetting interactions.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P023-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Synergistic or antagonistic effects can be known and modeled jointly rather than ignored by one-at-a-time ranking.", "slug": "synergy_and_antagonism"}], "residual_id": "r:cross_impact_interaction_mapping:b018_a12_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b018_a12_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "One driver may accelerate another, absorb it, change its timing, make it socially unacceptable, unlock an enabling condition, or turn an ordinary risk into a compound risk. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Risks, opportunities, or external changes are being ranked one by one despite plausible compounding or offsetting effects.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Risks, opportunities, or external changes are being ranked one by one despite plausible compounding or offsetting effects.", "One driver may accelerate another, absorb it, change its timing, make it socially unacceptable, unlock an enabling condition, or turn an ordinary risk into a compound risk."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Synergistic or antagonistic effects can be known and modeled jointly rather than ignored by one-at-a-time ranking.", "slug": "synergy_and_antagonism"}], "normalized_requirement": "Risks, opportunities, or external changes are being ranked one by one despite plausible compounding or offsetting effects.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Risks, opportunities, or external changes are being ranked one by one despite plausible compounding or offsetting effects.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P023-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a single focal trend forecast rather than an already joint multi-driver forecast.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "One trend forecast is the focal forecast.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve apparent persuasiveness rather than established predictive validity.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The focal forecast seems persuasive.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must contain external or additional drivers capable of interacting with the forecasted trend.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "One or more other drivers are distinct from the focal trend.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve possibility of alteration and cannot require that alteration has already occurred.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The other drivers could alter the selected forecast property.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve causal direction from other drivers to the forecast property.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The other drivers are the possible source of alteration to the focal forecast.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires possible alteration of the forecast trajectory.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "A complete alteration branch concerns the forecast's trajectory.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires possible alteration of what the forecast signifies or implies.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "A complete alteration branch concerns the forecast's meaning.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A single trend forecast seems persuasive, but other drivers could alter its trajectory or meaning.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A persuasive single-trend forecast is vulnerable to alteration by other drivers.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P023-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A future wheel can map consequences without a persuasive single-trend forecast or interacting drivers that alter it.", "slug": "future_wheel"}], "residual_id": "r:cross_impact_interaction_mapping:b018_a12_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b018_a12_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is not necessary when there is only one important driver, when a simple trend scan is enough, or when the task is to select robust actions across already coherent scenarios. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A single trend forecast seems persuasive, but other drivers could alter its trajectory or meaning.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A single trend forecast seems persuasive, but other drivers could alter its trajectory or meaning.", "It is not necessary when there is only one important driver, when a simple trend scan is enough, or when the task is to select robust actions across already coherent scenarios."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A future wheel can map consequences without a persuasive single-trend forecast or interacting drivers that alter it.", "slug": "future_wheel"}], "normalized_requirement": "A single trend forecast seems persuasive, but other drivers could alter its trajectory or meaning.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A single trend forecast seems persuasive, but other drivers could alter its trajectory or meaning.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "DISJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Decision makers need to identify which combinations of drivers create strategic thresholds, triggers, or option points.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The symptom is often a polished trend report or risk matrix that still leaves decision makers surprised when known drivers combine in unexpected ways. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: Decision makers need to identify which combinations of drivers create strategic thresholds, triggers, or option points. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Decision makers need to identify which combinations of drivers create strategic thresholds, triggers, or option points.", "The symptom is often a polished trend report or risk matrix that still leaves decision makers surprised when known drivers combine in unexpected ways."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Decision makers need to identify which combinations of drivers create strategic thresholds, triggers, or option points."}, {"display_text": "Horizon scanning or expert judgment has produced many signals that need to be connected rather than merely listed.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It fits scenario planning, horizon scanning, public policy, technology strategy, climate adaptation, market strategy, infrastructure planning, public health, and geopolitical risk when the future context will be shaped by driver combinations. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: Horizon scanning or expert judgment has produced many signals that need to be connected rather than merely listed. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Horizon scanning or expert judgment has produced many signals that need to be connected rather than merely listed.", "It fits scenario planning, horizon scanning, public policy, technology strategy, climate adaptation, market strategy, infrastructure planning, public health, and geopolitical risk when the future context will be shaped by driver combinations."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Horizon scanning or expert judgment has produced many signals that need to be connected rather than merely listed."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 18, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-018", "ledger_sha256": "0d794f02665a559f09b3c1bfed372707fc938160005cbbe18fe35518203d143a"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Cross-Language Constraint Check", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:cross_language_constraint_check", "slug": "cross_language_constraint_check"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 5, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is source-language overreach. A message or design behaves as if a linguistic feature will transfer automatically: a term has the same scope, a grammar distinction can be preserved, a category has a local equivalent, a source-language idiom has a safe target expression, a layout can hold translated text, a pronoun will remain clear, a formality choice will carry the same authority, or a legal/institutional label will map cleanly.\n\nWhen those assumptions fail, the result can look deceptively successful. The translated text may be fluent. The interface may compile. The glossary may be complete. But users may misunderstand what to do, lose a right, miss a warning, choose the wrong field, misinterpret a category, or distrust the message because the practical meaning did not transfer.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A design, message, policy, form, interface, category, or instruction assumes that a linguistic structure, term, grammar feature, category boundary, tone convention, script behavior, or contextual reference is universal when it may not transfer across target language contexts."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P023-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O11"], ["O1", "O2", "O12"], ["O1", "O3", "O11"], ["O1", "O3", "O12"], ["O1", "O4", "O11"], ["O1", "O4", "O12"], ["O1", "O5", "O11"], ["O1", "O5", "O12"], ["O1", "O6", "O11"], ["O1", "O6", "O12"], ["O1", "O7", "O11"], ["O1", "O7", "O12"], ["O1", "O8", "O11"], ["O1", "O8", "O12"], ["O1", "O9", "O11"], ["O1", "O9", "O12"], ["O1", "O10", "O11"], ["O1", "O10", "O12"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must contain an artifact used to communicate, govern, instruct, or structure action.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An operative artifact is the object of a cross-language adaptation requirement.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires the artifact subject to adaptation to be a message.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A complete artifact branch is a message.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires the artifact subject to adaptation to be an interface.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A complete artifact branch is an interface.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires the artifact subject to adaptation to be a warning.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A complete artifact branch is a warning.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires the artifact subject to adaptation to be a form.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "A complete artifact branch is a form.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires the artifact subject to adaptation to be a survey.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "A complete artifact branch is a survey.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires the artifact subject to adaptation to be a policy.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "A complete artifact branch is a policy.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires the artifact subject to adaptation to be a contract.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "A complete artifact branch is a contract.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires the artifact subject to adaptation to be a curriculum.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "A complete artifact branch is a curriculum.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires the artifact subject to adaptation to be a public-service flow.", "obligation_id": "O10", "statement": "A complete artifact branch is a public-service flow.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires translation as a mandatory operation, not merely optional availability.", "obligation_id": "O11", "statement": "A complete operation branch requires translation of the selected artifact.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires localization as a mandatory operation, not merely optional availability.", "obligation_id": "O12", "statement": "A complete operation branch requires localization of the selected artifact.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A message, interface, warning, form, survey, policy, contract, curriculum, or public-service flow must be translated or localized.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A listed operative artifact requires translation or localization.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P023-C08-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Translation and conceptual bridging can occur voluntarily in informal discourse and does not require any listed operative artifact or localization mandate.", "slug": "translation_and_conceptual_bridging"}], "residual_id": "r:cross_language_constraint_check:b018_a13_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b018_a13_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when a message, interface, policy, form, warning, survey, curriculum, contract, or service flow must be translated, localized, or otherwise moved across languages or language communities. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A message, interface, warning, form, survey, policy, contract, curriculum, or public-service flow must be translated or localized.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A message, interface, warning, form, survey, policy, contract, curriculum, or public-service flow must be translated or localized.", "Use this archetype when a message, interface, policy, form, warning, survey, curriculum, contract, or service flow must be translated, localized, or otherwise moved across languages or language communities."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Translation and conceptual bridging can occur voluntarily in informal discourse and does not require any listed operative artifact or localization mandate.", "slug": "translation_and_conceptual_bridging"}], "normalized_requirement": "A message, interface, warning, form, survey, policy, contract, curriculum, or public-service flow must be translated or localized.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A message, interface, warning, form, survey, policy, contract, curriculum, or public-service flow must be translated or localized.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P023-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must contain a source artifact whose form or interpretation is at issue.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A source artifact is the dependency-bearing object.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern grammar rather than arbitrary visual, technical, or cultural features.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A grammatical feature or distinction is the dependency target.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail load-bearing dependence, not merely the presence or mention of a grammar feature.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The source artifact depends on that grammatical feature.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "A source artifact depends on grammar features such as word order, tense, aspect, number, gender, pronouns, honorifics, negation, or scope.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A source artifact depends on a grammatical distinction.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P023-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Linguistic universals concern cross-language commonalities and do not require a source artifact to depend on any listed grammar feature.", "slug": "linguistic_universals"}], "residual_id": "r:cross_language_constraint_check:b018_a13_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b018_a13_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A message or design behaves as if a linguistic feature will transfer automatically: a term has the same scope, a grammar distinction can be preserved, a category has a local equivalent, a source-language idiom has a safe target expression, a layout can hold translated text, a pronoun will remain clear, a formality choice will carry the same authority, or a legal/institutional label will map cleanly. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A source artifact depends on grammar features such as word order, tense, aspect, number, gender, pronouns, honorifics, negation, or scope.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A source artifact depends on grammar features such as word order, tense, aspect, number, gender, pronouns, honorifics, negation, or scope.", "A message or design behaves as if a linguistic feature will transfer automatically: a term has the same scope, a grammar distinction can be preserved, a category has a local equivalent, a source-language idiom has a safe target expression, a layout can hold translated text, a pronoun will remain clear, a formality choice will carry the same authority, or a legal/institutional label will map cleanly."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Linguistic universals concern cross-language commonalities and do not require a source artifact to depend on any listed grammar feature.", "slug": "linguistic_universals"}], "normalized_requirement": "A source artifact depends on grammar features such as word order, tense, aspect, number, gender, pronouns, honorifics, negation, or scope.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A source artifact depends on grammar features such as word order, tense, aspect, number, gender, pronouns, honorifics, negation, or scope.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P023-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O9"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O10"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must contain a category in the source language, not an arbitrary word without categorical meaning.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A source category is the item being translated or mapped.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail domain-bearing meaning rather than a merely formal label.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The source category carries meaning in the selected domain.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a cross-language target rather than a mapping within one language.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A target language is the destination in which equivalence is assessed.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a possible direct-equivalence gap and cannot require that no equivalent actually exists.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The source category may have no direct equivalent in the target language.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires the source category's load-bearing meaning to be legal.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "A complete meaning-domain branch is legal meaning.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires the source category's load-bearing meaning to be institutional.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "A complete meaning-domain branch is institutional meaning.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires the source category's load-bearing meaning to be cultural.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "A complete meaning-domain branch is cultural meaning.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires the source category's load-bearing meaning to be medical.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "A complete meaning-domain branch is medical meaning.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires the source category's load-bearing meaning to be educational.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "A complete meaning-domain branch is educational meaning.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires the source category's load-bearing meaning to be administrative.", "obligation_id": "O10", "statement": "A complete meaning-domain branch is administrative meaning.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A source category has legal, institutional, cultural, medical, educational, or administrative meaning that may not have a direct target-language equivalent.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A source category with one listed domain meaning may lack a direct target-language equivalent.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P023-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Native-category flattening can occur during nonlinguistic recoding and does not require a lexical equivalence gap in any listed domain.", "slug": "native_category_flattening"}], "residual_id": "r:cross_language_constraint_check:b018_a13_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b018_a13_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A message or design behaves as if a linguistic feature will transfer automatically: a term has the same scope, a grammar distinction can be preserved, a category has a local equivalent, a source-language idiom has a safe target expression, a layout can hold translated text, a pronoun will remain clear, a formality choice will carry the same authority, or a legal/institutional label will map cleanly. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A source category has legal, institutional, cultural, medical, educational, or administrative meaning that may not have a direct target-language equivalent.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A source category has legal, institutional, cultural, medical, educational, or administrative meaning that may not have a direct target-language equivalent.", "A message or design behaves as if a linguistic feature will transfer automatically: a term has the same scope, a grammar distinction can be preserved, a category has a local equivalent, a source-language idiom has a safe target expression, a layout can hold translated text, a pronoun will remain clear, a formality choice will carry the same authority, or a legal/institutional label will map cleanly."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Native-category flattening can occur during nonlinguistic recoding and does not require a lexical equivalence gap in any listed domain.", "slug": "native_category_flattening"}], "normalized_requirement": "A source category has legal, institutional, cultural, medical, educational, or administrative meaning that may not have a direct target-language equivalent.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A source category has legal, institutional, cultural, medical, educational, or administrative meaning that may not have a direct target-language equivalent.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P023-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O9"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O10"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern literal translation rather than adaptation or interpretation generally.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Literal translation is the transformation process.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve possibility and cannot require an already realized change.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The selected change could occur.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve causal direction from literal translation to the changed target.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Literal translation could cause change in the selected target.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires literal translation potentially to change obligations.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A complete change-target branch is obligations.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires literal translation potentially to change warnings.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "A complete change-target branch is warnings.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires literal translation potentially to change rights.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "A complete change-target branch is rights.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires literal translation potentially to change eligibility.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "A complete change-target branch is eligibility.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires literal translation potentially to change decision consequences.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "A complete change-target branch is decision consequences.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires literal translation potentially to change social status.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "A complete change-target branch is social status.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires literal translation potentially to change user action.", "obligation_id": "O10", "statement": "A complete change-target branch is user action.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Literal translation could change obligations, warnings, rights, eligibility, decision consequences, social status, or user action.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Literal translation could change one listed operative meaning or consequence.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P023-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Conceptual bridging may address a harmless descriptive mismatch and does not necessarily alter obligations, rights, status, or action.", "slug": "translation_and_conceptual_bridging"}], "residual_id": "r:cross_language_constraint_check:b018_a13_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b018_a13_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially important when misunderstanding would affect safety, eligibility, consent, deadlines, rights, payment, diagnosis, user action, public trust, or access to services. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Literal translation could change obligations, warnings, rights, eligibility, decision consequences, social status, or user action.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Literal translation could change obligations, warnings, rights, eligibility, decision consequences, social status, or user action.", "It is especially important when misunderstanding would affect safety, eligibility, consent, deadlines, rights, payment, diagnosis, user action, public trust, or access to services."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Conceptual bridging may address a harmless descriptive mismatch and does not necessarily alter obligations, rights, status, or action.", "slug": "translation_and_conceptual_bridging"}], "normalized_requirement": "Literal translation could change obligations, warnings, rights, eligibility, decision consequences, social status, or user action.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Literal translation could change obligations, warnings, rights, eligibility, decision consequences, social status, or user action.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P023-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must contain a team or equivalent collective design actor.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A team is the actor selecting or using a design baseline.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require a dominant language, not any neutral technical standard.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A dominant language is the representation used by the team.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail actual baseline use in design, not merely availability of the language.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The team is using the dominant language as a design baseline.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the neutrality attribution rather than only convenience or familiarity.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The team treats that baseline as neutral.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the neutral-versus-local comparison and the existence of alternative representations.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The dominant language is treated as neutral rather than as one local representation among others.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "A team is using a dominant language as if it were a neutral design baseline rather than one local representation among others.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A team treats a dominant language as a neutral design baseline instead of one local representation among others.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P023-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A cross-language universal can be genuine and does not entail a team treating one dominant language as a neutral design baseline.", "slug": "linguistic_universals"}], "residual_id": "r:cross_language_constraint_check:b018_a13_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b018_a13_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is also appropriate when a team is designing in one dominant language and assuming that its categories, field labels, grammar, examples, or interface layout are neutral. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A team is using a dominant language as if it were a neutral design baseline rather than one local representation among others.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A team is using a dominant language as if it were a neutral design baseline rather than one local representation among others.", "It is also appropriate when a team is designing in one dominant language and assuming that its categories, field labels, grammar, examples, or interface layout are neutral."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A cross-language universal can be genuine and does not entail a team treating one dominant language as a neutral design baseline.", "slug": "linguistic_universals"}], "normalized_requirement": "A team is using a dominant language as if it were a neutral design baseline rather than one local representation among others.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A team is using a dominant language as if it were a neutral design baseline rather than one local representation among others.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The product or document must support multiple scripts, reading directions, locale formats, text expansion, sorting rules, or input conventions.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A design, message, policy, form, interface, category, or instruction assumes that a linguistic structure, term, grammar feature, category boundary, tone convention, script behavior, or contextual reference is universal when it may not transfer across target language contexts. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: The product or document must support multiple scripts, reading directions, locale formats, text expansion, sorting rules, or input conventions. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The product or document must support multiple scripts, reading directions, locale formats, text expansion, sorting rules, or input conventions.", "A design, message, policy, form, interface, category, or instruction assumes that a linguistic structure, term, grammar feature, category boundary, tone convention, script behavior, or contextual reference is universal when it may not transfer across target language contexts."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The product or document must support multiple scripts, reading directions, locale formats, text expansion, sorting rules, or input conventions."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 18, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-018", "ledger_sha256": "0d794f02665a559f09b3c1bfed372707fc938160005cbbe18fe35518203d143a"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Cross-Scale Causal Mapping", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:cross_scale_causal_mapping", "slug": "cross_scale_causal_mapping"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 4, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 5, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 6 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 1 of 4 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is scale mismatch. The system is being interpreted at one level while meaningful causes, constraints, mediators, or consequences operate at another. This creates predictable errors: local actors are blamed for choices shaped by higher-level constraints; system-level designers overlook how rules become distorted locally; small actions are dismissed because their aggregate consequences are invisible; and interventions are aimed where symptoms appear rather than where leverage exists.\n\nThe deepest tension is that the most visible level is not always the most causal level. A symptom may be local, the mediator may be institutional, and the leverage point may be regional or system-wide. Conversely, a system-level pattern may be generated by repeated local actions that no single local actor experiences as consequential.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system is analyzed at one level while important causes, constraints, mediators, or effects operate at another level."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A vulnerability hotspot can be visibly dangerous at the local level and does not entail an action that appears harmless or ineffective in isolation.", "slug": "vulnerability_hotspot"}], "residual_id": "r:cross_scale_causal_mapping:b018_a14_c1", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b018_a14_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Conversely, a system-level pattern may be generated by repeated local actions that no single local actor experiences as consequential. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Local actions appear harmless or ineffective in isolation.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Local actions appear harmless or ineffective in isolation.", "Conversely, a system-level pattern may be generated by repeated local actions that no single local actor experiences as consequential."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A vulnerability hotspot can be visibly dangerous at the local level and does not entail an action that appears harmless or ineffective in isolation.", "slug": "vulnerability_hotspot"}], "normalized_requirement": "Local actions appear harmless or ineffective in isolation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Local actions appear harmless or ineffective in isolation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Contextual mode switching changes behavior across contexts and does not require macro rules to be backgrounded.", "slug": "contextual_mode_switching"}], "residual_id": "r:cross_scale_causal_mapping:b018_a14_c2", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b018_a14_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Typical triggers include local actions producing surprising system-level effects, macro policies shaping local choices, remote or higher-level conditions appearing as local symptoms, or repeated wrong-level interventions. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Macro rules or system conditions are treated as background context.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Macro rules or system conditions are treated as background context.", "Typical triggers include local actions producing surprising system-level effects, macro policies shaping local choices, remote or higher-level conditions appearing as local symptoms, or repeated wrong-level interventions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Contextual mode switching changes behavior across contexts and does not require macro rules to be backgrounded.", "slug": "contextual_mode_switching"}], "normalized_requirement": "Macro rules or system conditions are treated as background context.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Macro rules or system conditions are treated as background context.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "A causal mechanism connects local actions, intermediate organization, and macro conditions so that explanation and intervention must preserve cross-level pathways.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A causal mechanism connects local actions, intermediate organization, and macro conditions so that explanation and intervention must preserve cross-level pathways.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P023-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must contain multiple distinct stakeholders whose explanations can be compared.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Two or more stakeholders are involved.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the same problem object across stakeholders rather than different problems.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The stakeholders are explaining one shared problem.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail explanatory accounts, not merely different interests or preferred solutions.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Each stakeholder supplies an explanation of that problem.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a cross-level distinction rather than wording differences at one level.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The stakeholders' explanations operate at different analytical levels.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Different stakeholders explain the same problem at different levels.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Multiple stakeholders explain the same problem at different analytical levels.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P023-C13-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Stakeholder analysis can find aligned explanations at one level and does not require a cross-scale disagreement.", "slug": "stakeholder_analysis"}], "residual_id": "r:cross_scale_causal_mapping:b018_a14_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b018_a14_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when the problem cannot be explained well at only one level. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Different stakeholders explain the same problem at different levels.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Different stakeholders explain the same problem at different levels.", "Use this archetype when the problem cannot be explained well at only one level."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Stakeholder analysis can find aligned explanations at one level and does not require a cross-scale disagreement.", "slug": "stakeholder_analysis"}], "normalized_requirement": "Different stakeholders explain the same problem at different levels.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Different stakeholders explain the same problem at different levels.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "A causal mechanism connects local actions, intermediate organization, and macro conditions so that explanation and intervention must preserve cross-level pathways.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A causal mechanism connects local actions, intermediate organization, and macro conditions so that explanation and intervention must preserve cross-level pathways.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P023-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must contain an implemented intervention, not only a proposed idea that is never applied.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An intervention is applied to the problem.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require repeated application rather than one unsuccessful attempt.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The same intervention pattern is applied repeatedly.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the symptom-visible locus rather than an arbitrary intervention site.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The intervention is applied where the symptoms are visible.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail absent outcome change, not merely smaller-than-hoped improvement.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The repeated intervention does not change the relevant outcomes.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must link the ineffective applications to the same outcomes rather than combine unrelated recurrence and failure facts.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The repeated symptom-locus applications and unchanged outcomes concern the same intervention and problem.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "A proposed intervention is repeatedly applied where symptoms are visible but does not change outcomes.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A symptom-locus intervention is repeatedly applied without changing outcomes.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P023-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An intervention stack can accumulate effective layers for changing goals and need not repeat a symptom-level fix that fails to change outcomes.", "slug": "intervention_stack_accretion"}], "residual_id": "r:cross_scale_causal_mapping:b018_a14_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b018_a14_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Typical triggers include local actions producing surprising system-level effects, macro policies shaping local choices, remote or higher-level conditions appearing as local symptoms, or repeated wrong-level interventions. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A proposed intervention is repeatedly applied where symptoms are visible but does not change outcomes.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A proposed intervention is repeatedly applied where symptoms are visible but does not change outcomes.", "Typical triggers include local actions producing surprising system-level effects, macro policies shaping local choices, remote or higher-level conditions appearing as local symptoms, or repeated wrong-level interventions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An intervention stack can accumulate effective layers for changing goals and need not repeat a symptom-level fix that fails to change outcomes.", "slug": "intervention_stack_accretion"}], "normalized_requirement": "A proposed intervention is repeatedly applied where symptoms are visible but does not change outcomes.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A proposed intervention is repeatedly applied where symptoms are visible but does not change outcomes.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "A causal mechanism connects local actions, intermediate organization, and macro conditions so that explanation and intervention must preserve cross-level pathways.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A causal mechanism connects local actions, intermediate organization, and macro conditions so that explanation and intervention must preserve cross-level pathways.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires separately optimized stages to omit interstage effects so locally rational choices compound into a worse chain-level outcome, satisfying the first alternative.", "role_mapping": "Local optimization -> stage objective; system side effect -> omitted interstage effect and worse joint result.", "slug": "serial_local_optimization_failure", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b018_a14_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "If the work is only to create a local/global diagram or a dashboard, that is a mechanism, not the archetype. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A local optimization creates system-level side effects, or a system-level optimization creates local brittleness.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A local optimization creates system-level side effects, or a system-level optimization creates local brittleness.", "If the work is only to create a local/global diagram or a dashboard, that is a mechanism, not the archetype."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Serial Local Optimization Failure", "one_liner": "Stages arranged in series each optimize a local objective while treating their effects on other stages as outside that objective, so individually rational choices compound into an outcome worse than joint optimization.", "page_ref": "prime:serial_local_optimization_failure", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Local optimization -> stage objective; system side effect -> omitted interstage effect and worse joint result.", "slug": "serial_local_optimization_failure", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires separately optimized stages to omit interstage effects so locally rational choices compound into a worse chain-level outcome, satisfying the first alternative."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A local optimization creates system-level side effects, or a system-level optimization creates local brittleness.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 18, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-018", "ledger_sha256": "0d794f02665a559f09b3c1bfed372707fc938160005cbbe18fe35518203d143a"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Cross-Scale Intervention Matching", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:cross_scale_intervention_matching", "slug": "cross_scale_intervention_matching"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 5, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 5, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 5 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is wrong-level action. A system treats a problem at the symptom scale because that is where the harm is visible, politically urgent, administratively convenient, or emotionally salient. Yet the generator may sit above, below, beside, or between the visible level.\n\nA clinic may see repeated illness that is generated by housing exposure. A manager may see employee errors that are generated by workflow and incentive design. A platform may see unsafe user behavior that is generated by interface defaults. A watershed may show local pollution whose generator is regional land use. In each case, symptom-scale action may be necessary but insufficient.\n\nThe deeper mismatch is that symptom scale, cause scale, leverage scale, authority scale, and measurement scale can all be different.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A problem is treated at the scale where it is visible, politically salient, or administratively convenient even though the causal pattern or practical leverage operates at a different scale."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P023-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must contain multiple applications of fixes at a local level.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Local fixes are applied repeatedly.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve causal relief from the fixes, not coincidental temporary improvement.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The local fixes produce relief from the problem.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require temporary relief rather than a durable outcome.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The relief is short-lived.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail recurrence of the original problem rather than emergence of a different problem.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The same problem returns after the relief.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the relief-then-recurrence order rather than simultaneous persistence.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Relief occurs before the problem returns.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "Repeated local fixes produce short-lived relief while the problem returns.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Repeated local fixes produce temporary relief followed by recurrence of the same problem.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P023-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A counterresponse can cancel a single intervention and need not involve repeated local fixes or problem recurrence after relief.", "slug": "counterresponse_offset"}], "residual_id": "r:cross_scale_intervention_matching:b018_a15_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b018_a15_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially relevant when local fixes keep failing, when broad reforms are proposed without local fit, when the actor asked to solve the problem lacks authority over the generator, or when improvement at one level seems to worsen conditions at another. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Repeated local fixes produce short-lived relief while the problem returns.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Repeated local fixes produce short-lived relief while the problem returns.", "It is especially relevant when local fixes keep failing, when broad reforms are proposed without local fit, when the actor asked to solve the problem lacks authority over the generator, or when improvement at one level seems to worsen conditions at another."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A counterresponse can cancel a single intervention and need not involve repeated local fixes or problem recurrence after relief.", "slug": "counterresponse_offset"}], "normalized_requirement": "Repeated local fixes produce short-lived relief while the problem returns.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Repeated local fixes produce short-lived relief while the problem returns.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P024-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve multiple interested parties as the actors in the disagreement.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Stakeholders are the parties holding the conflicting judgments.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a common focal issue whose scale classification is disputed.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "One issue is the object whose scale is being classified.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail conflicting judgments, not merely stakeholder variety or consultation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The stakeholders disagree in their judgments about the issue.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must make the issue’s scale category across the listed individual-to-environmental levels the axis of disagreement.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The disputed attribute is whether the issue is individual, local, organizational, systemic, or environmental in scale.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Stakeholders disagree about whether the issue is individual, local, organizational, systemic, or environmental.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Stakeholders disagree about an issue’s scale classification.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P024-C01-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Stakeholder analysis does not require disagreement about causal scale.", "slug": "stakeholder_analysis"}], "residual_id": "r:cross_scale_intervention_matching:b018_a15_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b018_a15_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is also useful when stakeholders are arguing in different scale languages: one group sees individual behavior, another sees team process, another sees institutional incentives, and another sees broader policy or infrastructure. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Stakeholders disagree about whether the issue is individual, local, organizational, systemic, or environmental.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders disagree about whether the issue is individual, local, organizational,\nsystemic, or environmental.", "It is also useful when stakeholders are arguing in different scale languages: one group sees individual behavior, another sees team process, another sees institutional incentives, and another sees broader policy or infrastructure."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Stakeholder analysis does not require disagreement about causal scale.", "slug": "stakeholder_analysis"}], "normalized_requirement": "Stakeholders disagree about whether the issue is individual, local, organizational, systemic, or environmental.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Stakeholders disagree about whether the issue is individual, local, organizational, systemic, or environmental.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P024-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve distinct local and aggregate observations of the same intervention or system.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Outcome indicators are observed at both local and aggregate scales.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail cross-scale disagreement between apparent improvement and harm or growing risk.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The local and aggregate observations point in opposing welfare directions.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires favorable movement in the aggregate metric.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Aggregate metrics improve.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires local harm to remain present during the aggregate improvement.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Local harm persists while aggregate metrics improve.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires favorable movement in the local metric.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Local metrics improve.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires aggregate risk to increase during the local improvement.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "Aggregate risk grows while local metrics improve.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "Aggregate metrics improve while local harm persists, or local metrics improve while aggregate risk grows.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Local and aggregate outcome indicators move in opposing welfare directions.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P024-C02-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A majority-dominated objective can underweight a minority without any temporal improvement in aggregate metrics or persistence of local harm.", "slug": "majority_dominated_aggregate_objective"}], "residual_id": "r:cross_scale_intervention_matching:b018_a15_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b018_a15_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Aggregate metrics improve while local harm persists, or local metrics improve while aggregate risk grows. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Aggregate metrics improve while local harm persists, or local metrics improve while\naggregate risk grows."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A majority-dominated objective can underweight a minority without any temporal improvement in aggregate metrics or persistence of local harm.", "slug": "majority_dominated_aggregate_objective"}], "normalized_requirement": "Aggregate metrics improve while local harm persists, or local metrics improve while aggregate risk grows.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Aggregate metrics improve while local harm persists, or local metrics improve while aggregate risk grows.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P024-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an actor bearing explicit problem-solving responsibility.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An actor is assigned or asked to solve the problem.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the conditions that produce the problem as the authority target.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The problem-producing conditions are the objects over which the actor’s authority is assessed.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail that the authority target is causally productive of the assigned problem.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The conditions produce the problem the actor must solve.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require absence of relevant authority, not merely limited resources or low influence.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The assigned actor lacks authority over those producing conditions.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "The actor asked to solve the problem lacks authority over the conditions that produce it.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An actor assigned to solve a problem lacks authority over its producing conditions.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P024-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Diffused responsibility can reduce action despite every responder having adequate authority, and does not entail authority over causal conditions.", "slug": "bystander_effect"}], "residual_id": "r:cross_scale_intervention_matching:b018_a15_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b018_a15_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially relevant when local fixes keep failing, when broad reforms are proposed without local fit, when the actor asked to solve the problem lacks authority over the generator, or when improvement at one level seems to worsen conditions at another. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The actor asked to solve the problem lacks authority over the conditions that produce it.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The actor asked to solve the problem lacks authority over the conditions that produce it.", "It is especially relevant when local fixes keep failing, when broad reforms are proposed without local fit, when the actor asked to solve the problem lacks authority over the generator, or when improvement at one level seems to worsen conditions at another."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Diffused responsibility can reduce action despite every responder having adequate authority, and does not entail authority over causal conditions.", "slug": "bystander_effect"}], "normalized_requirement": "The actor asked to solve the problem lacks authority over the conditions that produce it.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The actor asked to solve the problem lacks authority over the conditions that produce it.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B5", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P024-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an intervention as the causal actor and locate it at one system level.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An intervention operates at a source level.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require a cross-level destination rather than an effect confined to the intervention level.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The resulting effect occurs at a level distinct from the intervention level.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail the directed causal relation from the intervention to the cross-level effect.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The intervention causes the effect at the other level.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a rebound effect at the destination level.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The cross-level effect is rebound.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires displacement of effect or burden to the destination level.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The cross-level effect is displacement.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires compensatory response at the destination level.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The cross-level effect is compensation.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Interventions at one level cause rebound, displacement, or compensation at another level.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An intervention at one level causes a countervailing or displaced effect at another level.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P024-C04-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A compensatory response can occur within the same level and does not necessarily create a cross-level effect.", "slug": "counterresponse_offset"}], "residual_id": "r:cross_scale_intervention_matching:b018_a15_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b018_a15_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially relevant when local fixes keep failing, when broad reforms are proposed without local fit, when the actor asked to solve the problem lacks authority over the generator, or when improvement at one level seems to worsen conditions at another. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Interventions at one level cause rebound, displacement, or compensation at another level.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Interventions at one level cause rebound, displacement, or compensation at another level.", "It is especially relevant when local fixes keep failing, when broad reforms are proposed without local fit, when the actor asked to solve the problem lacks authority over the generator, or when improvement at one level seems to worsen conditions at another."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A compensatory response can occur within the same level and does not necessarily create a cross-level effect.", "slug": "counterresponse_offset"}], "normalized_requirement": "Interventions at one level cause rebound, displacement, or compensation at another level.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Interventions at one level cause rebound, displacement, or compensation at another level.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 5", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "DISJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 18, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-018", "ledger_sha256": "0d794f02665a559f09b3c1bfed372707fc938160005cbbe18fe35518203d143a"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Cross-Side Platform Balancing", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:cross_side_platform_balancing", "slug": "cross_side_platform_balancing"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 5 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A platform mediates two distinct participant groups, and each group’s willingness to join, remain, transact, or contribute depends on the size, quality, trustworthiness, price, and accessibility of the other group.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A platform mediates two distinct participant groups, and each group’s willingness to join, remain, transact, or contribute depends on the size, quality, trustworthiness, price, and accessibility of the other group."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A mature two-sided market can have simultaneous active participation and no side waiting for the other to arrive.", "slug": "two_sided_market"}], "residual_id": "r:cross_side_platform_balancing:b019_a01_c1", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b019_a01_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: One side waits for the other side to arrive before joining or engaging. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["One side waits for the other side to arrive before joining or engaging."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A mature two-sided market can have simultaneous active participation and no side waiting for the other to arrive.", "slug": "two_sided_market"}], "normalized_requirement": "One side waits for the other side to arrive before joining or engaging.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "One side waits for the other side to arrive before joining or engaging.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires each distinct side's marginal value to rise with participation on the other side; crowding or quality loss is a possible countervailing same-side effect.", "role_mapping": "Participation side -> one user group; other side value -> cross-side externality; countervailing effect -> demand balancing.", "slug": "two_sided_market", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b019_a01_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Maximizing direct revenue from one side can destroy the other side’s willingness to participate, and maximizing raw participation can destroy quality or liquidity. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Participation growth on one side creates value for the other side, but same-side crowding or low quality can reduce value.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Participation growth on one side creates value for the other side, but same-side crowding or low quality can reduce value.", "Maximizing direct revenue from one side can destroy the other side’s willingness to participate, and maximizing raw participation can destroy quality or liquidity."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Two Sided Market", "one_liner": "A platform mediates two distinct user groups whose participation creates value for each other, so each side's marginal value rises with the other side's size and the two demand schedules must be balanced together.", "page_ref": "prime:two_sided_market", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Participation side -> one user group; other side value -> cross-side externality; countervailing effect -> demand balancing.", "slug": "two_sided_market", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires each distinct side's marginal value to rise with participation on the other side; crowding or quality loss is a possible countervailing same-side effect."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Participation growth on one side creates value for the other side, but same-side crowding or low quality can reduce value.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P024-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve enrolled or present participation that is not yet usable liquidity.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Nominal participation is the input state being converted.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve actionable platform liquidity rather than participation count alone.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Usable liquidity is the possible output state.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must make the control decisive for participation-to-liquidity conversion.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The platform control determines whether the input becomes the output.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires search as the platform conversion control.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The governing control is a search control.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires matching as the platform conversion control.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The governing control is a matching control.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires ranking as the platform conversion control.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The governing control is a ranking control.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires trust as the platform conversion control.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The governing control is a trust control.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires fraud prevention or detection as the platform conversion control.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The governing control is a fraud control.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Search, matching, ranking, trust, or fraud controls determine whether nominal participation becomes usable liquidity.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A platform control determines whether nominal participation converts into usable liquidity.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P024-C05-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Cross-side value can arise through direct exposure or access without any listed liquidity-control mechanism.", "slug": "two_sided_market"}], "residual_id": "r:cross_side_platform_balancing:b019_a01_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b019_a01_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Maximizing direct revenue from one side can destroy the other side’s willingness to participate, and maximizing raw participation can destroy quality or liquidity. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Search, matching, ranking, trust, or fraud controls determine whether nominal participation becomes usable liquidity.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Search, matching, ranking, trust, or fraud controls determine whether nominal participation becomes usable liquidity.", "Maximizing direct revenue from one side can destroy the other side’s willingness to participate, and maximizing raw participation can destroy quality or liquidity."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Cross-side value can arise through direct exposure or access without any listed liquidity-control mechanism.", "slug": "two_sided_market"}], "normalized_requirement": "Search, matching, ranking, trust, or fraud controls determine whether nominal participation becomes usable liquidity.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Search, matching, ranking, trust, or fraud controls determine whether nominal participation becomes usable liquidity.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P024-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a distinct platform side as the group that must be recruited.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "One participant side is the recruitment target.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve cross-side value flowing from the recruitment target to another side.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The focal side creates value for another platform side.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the source's high or major degree of cross-side value.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The cross-side value created is major.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require subsidy for recruitment rather than merely permit or recommend it.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The focal side cannot be recruited without subsidy.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the barrier-to-subsidy-dependence explanatory relation.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "A listed barrier is why unsubsidized recruitment fails.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires recruitment cost to be the binding barrier.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The recruitment barrier is excessive expense.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires scarcity of the focal side to be the binding barrier.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The recruitment barrier is scarcity.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires recruitment risk to be the binding barrier.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The recruitment barrier is excessive risk.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "A side that creates major cross-side value is too expensive, too scarce, or too risky to recruit without subsidy.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A platform side with major cross-side value cannot be recruited without subsidy because of a listed barrier.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P024-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A cross-boundary subsidy can redistribute for equity or policy reasons without recruiting a scarce, risky, high-cross-side-value group.", "slug": "cross_boundary_subsidy"}], "residual_id": "r:cross_side_platform_balancing:b019_a01_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b019_a01_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The platform must optimize a coupled cross-side system while each side experiences local price, friction, quality, and trust conditions differently. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A side that creates major cross-side value is too expensive, too scarce, or too risky to recruit without subsidy.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A side that creates major cross-side value is too expensive, too scarce, or too risky to recruit without subsidy.", "The platform must optimize a coupled cross-side system while each side experiences local price, friction, quality, and trust conditions differently."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A cross-boundary subsidy can redistribute for equity or policy reasons without recruiting a scarce, risky, high-cross-side-value group.", "slug": "cross_boundary_subsidy"}], "normalized_requirement": "A side that creates major cross-side value is too expensive, too scarce, or too risky to recruit without subsidy.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A side that creates major cross-side value is too expensive, too scarce, or too risky to recruit without subsidy.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Cross-side demand schedules can respond slowly, and no rule change is necessary for the prime.", "slug": "two_sided_market"}], "residual_id": "r:cross_side_platform_balancing:b019_a01_c7", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b019_a01_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Maximizing direct revenue from one side can destroy the other side’s willingness to participate, and maximizing raw participation can destroy quality or liquidity. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A rule change on one side rapidly changes participation, quality, or welfare on the other side.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A rule change on one side rapidly changes participation, quality, or welfare on the other side.", "Maximizing direct revenue from one side can destroy the other side’s willingness to participate, and maximizing raw participation can destroy quality or liquidity."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Cross-side demand schedules can respond slowly, and no rule change is necessary for the prime.", "slug": "two_sided_market"}], "normalized_requirement": "A rule change on one side rapidly changes participation, quality, or welfare on the other side.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A rule change on one side rapidly changes participation, quality, or welfare on the other side.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The platform must set asymmetric prices, subsidies, commissions, or frictions across sides.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The platform must optimize a coupled cross-side system while each side experiences local price, friction, quality, and trust conditions differently. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: The platform must set asymmetric prices, subsidies, commissions, or frictions across sides. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The platform must set asymmetric prices, subsidies, commissions, or frictions across sides.", "The platform must optimize a coupled cross-side system while each side experiences local price, friction, quality, and trust conditions differently."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "The platform must set asymmetric prices, subsidies, commissions, or frictions across sides."}, {"display_text": "Network effects are strong enough that cold start, tipping, lock-in, or winner-take-all dynamics are plausible.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Network effects are strong enough that cold start, tipping, lock-in, or winner-take-all dynamics are plausible. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Network effects are strong enough that cold start, tipping, lock-in, or winner-take-all dynamics are plausible."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Network effects are strong enough that cold start, tipping, lock-in, or winner-take-all dynamics are plausible."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 19, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-019", "ledger_sha256": "58156252558001ee8819c0176a1fcde7974c6d0268e7e7da184436d67b8e4ead"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Cue-Triggered Intention Execution", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:cue_triggered_intention_execution", "slug": "cue_triggered_intention_execution"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 3 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A future action is important but cannot or should not be performed now. If it remains only as a general intention, it competes with current work, decays, or fails to surface when the relevant cue appears. The system needs a way to make the future situation itself retrieve the action without continuous rehearsal.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A future action is important but cannot or should not be performed now. If it remains only as a general intention, it competes with current work, decays, or fails to surface when the relevant cue appears. The system needs a way to make the future situation itself retrieve the action without continuous rehearsal."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires an intended future action paired with a time- or event-based triggering cue and executed when that cue fires.", "role_mapping": "Later action -> encoded intention; listed occurrence -> triggering cue.", "slug": "prospective_memory", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime pre-binds a specific future cue to a specific behavior for automatic runtime dispatch.", "role_mapping": "Specific cue -> if-condition; later action -> bound response.", "slug": "implementation_intention", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b019_a02_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A future action is important but cannot or should not be performed now. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: An action must be performed later when a specific time, event, location, state, or social cue occurs.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["An action must be performed later when a specific time, event, location, state, or social cue occurs.", "A future action is important but cannot or should not be performed now."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Prospective Memory", "one_liner": "An intended future action is encoded paired with a triggering cue, persists latently without rehearsal, and is retrieved and executed when a parallel cue-detection process fires.", "page_ref": "prime:prospective_memory", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Later action -> encoded intention; listed occurrence -> triggering cue.", "slug": "prospective_memory", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires an intended future action paired with a time- or event-based triggering cue and executed when that cue fires."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Implementation Intention", "one_liner": "Pre-binding a specific future cue to a specific action so that at execution time the cue triggers the behavior without re-deliberation.", "page_ref": "prime:implementation_intention", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Specific cue -> if-condition; later action -> bound response.", "slug": "implementation_intention", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime pre-binds a specific future cue to a specific behavior for automatic runtime dispatch."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "An action must be performed later when a specific time, event, location, state, or social cue occurs.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Prospective memory uses a parallel cue detector but the actor need not be occupied by another task when the cue appears.", "slug": "prospective_memory"}], "residual_id": "r:cue_triggered_intention_execution:b019_a02_c2", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b019_a02_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The actor will be occupied by other tasks when the cue appears. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The actor will be occupied by other tasks when the cue appears."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Prospective memory uses a parallel cue detector but the actor need not be occupied by another task when the cue appears.", "slug": "prospective_memory"}], "normalized_requirement": "The actor will be occupied by other tasks when the cue appears.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The actor will be occupied by other tasks when the cue appears.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime stores the intention without rehearsal but does not require rehearsal to have been costly, distracting, or unreliable.", "slug": "prospective_memory"}], "residual_id": "r:cue_triggered_intention_execution:b019_a02_c3", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b019_a02_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The system needs a way to make the future situation itself retrieve the action without continuous rehearsal. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Continuous rehearsal would be costly, distracting, or unreliable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Continuous rehearsal would be costly, distracting, or unreliable.", "The system needs a way to make the future situation itself retrieve the action without continuous rehearsal."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime stores the intention without rehearsal but does not require rehearsal to have been costly, distracting, or unreliable.", "slug": "prospective_memory"}], "normalized_requirement": "Continuous rehearsal would be costly, distracting, or unreliable.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Continuous rehearsal would be costly, distracting, or unreliable.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The cue can be specified and detected with enough fidelity to support action.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: The cue can be specified and detected with enough fidelity to support action. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The cue can be specified and detected with enough fidelity to support action."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The cue can be specified and detected with enough fidelity to support action."}, {"display_text": "Failure to act at cue-time would cause omission, delay, safety risk, coordination failure, or missed opportunity.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Failure to act at cue-time would cause omission, delay, safety risk, coordination failure, or missed opportunity. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Failure to act at cue-time would cause omission, delay, safety risk, coordination failure, or missed opportunity."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Failure to act at cue-time would cause omission, delay, safety risk, coordination failure, or missed opportunity."}, {"display_text": "The action can be closed, rescheduled, or escalated after the cue fires.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: The action can be closed, rescheduled, or escalated after the cue fires. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The action can be closed, rescheduled, or escalated after the cue fires."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The action can be closed, rescheduled, or escalated after the cue fires."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 19, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-019", "ledger_sha256": "58156252558001ee8819c0176a1fcde7974c6d0268e7e7da184436d67b8e4ead"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Cultural Friction Mediation Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:cultural_friction_mediation_design", "slug": "cultural_friction_mediation_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "An external artifact, practice, policy, technology, model, metric, or communicative form is introduced into a context whose cultural norms and meanings do not match the origin assumptions embedded in the artifact. The resulting incompatibility is misread as mere user resistance, ignorance, irrationality, or poor communication, so sponsors attempt training or pressure while the real friction surface remains unaddressed.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "An external artifact, practice, policy, technology, model, metric, or communicative form is introduced into a context whose cultural norms and meanings do not match the origin assumptions embedded in the artifact. The resulting incompatibility is misread as mere user resistance, ignorance, irrationality, or poor communication, so sponsors attempt training or pressure while the real friction surface remains unaddressed."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires an external artifact or system to meet a different cultural norm system at an interface.", "role_mapping": "Artifact -> external form; boundary -> cultural interface.", "slug": "cultural_friction", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b019_a03_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Artifact crosses a cultural or organizational boundary. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Artifact crosses a cultural or organizational boundary"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Cultural Friction", "one_liner": "Incompatibilities arise when external artifacts meet cultural norms.", "page_ref": "prime:cultural_friction", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Artifact -> external form; boundary -> cultural interface.", "slug": "cultural_friction", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires an external artifact or system to meet a different cultural norm system at an interface."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "An artifact crosses a cultural or organizational boundary.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's collision exists because local values and norms condition how the imported artifact is received and used.", "role_mapping": "Local norms -> receiving value system; use -> collision or adaptation.", "slug": "cultural_friction", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b019_a03_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Transfer wants fidelity to a useful external form, while the receiving culture demands fit with local norms, meanings, identity boundaries, and legitimacy conditions. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Local norms shape use.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Local norms shape use", "Transfer wants fidelity to a useful external form, while the receiving culture demands fit with local norms, meanings, identity boundaries, and legitimacy conditions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Cultural Friction", "one_liner": "Incompatibilities arise when external artifacts meet cultural norms.", "page_ref": "prime:cultural_friction", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Local norms -> receiving value system; use -> collision or adaptation.", "slug": "cultural_friction", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's collision exists because local values and norms condition how the imported artifact is received and used."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Local norms shape use.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A transferred artifact can be rejected or renegotiated because of incompatibility without its meaning changing.", "slug": "cultural_friction"}], "residual_id": "r:cultural_friction_mediation_design:b019_a03_c3", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b019_a03_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Meaning changes after transfer. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Meaning changes after transfer"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A transferred artifact can be rejected or renegotiated because of incompatibility without its meaning changing.", "slug": "cultural_friction"}], "normalized_requirement": "Meaning changes after transfer.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Meaning changes after transfer.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Sponsors need function but not necessarily original form.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: Sponsors need function but not necessarily original form. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Sponsors need function but not necessarily original form"]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Sponsors need function but not necessarily original form"}, {"display_text": "Resistance contains information.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Resistance contains information. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Resistance contains information"]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Resistance contains information"}, {"display_text": "A legitimacy boundary matters.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Transfer wants fidelity to a useful external form, while the receiving culture demands fit with local norms, meanings, identity boundaries, and legitimacy conditions. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: A legitimacy boundary matters. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A legitimacy boundary matters", "Transfer wants fidelity to a useful external form, while the receiving culture demands fit with local norms, meanings, identity boundaries, and legitimacy conditions."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "A legitimacy boundary matters"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 19, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-019", "ledger_sha256": "58156252558001ee8819c0176a1fcde7974c6d0268e7e7da184436d67b8e4ead"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Culture Lag Response", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:culture_lag_response", "slug": "culture_lag_response"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Social and cultural systems contain layers with different time constants. Software can change weekly, professional education over years, law over legislative cycles, norms through distributed experience, and physical or institutional infrastructure over decades. Difference in speed is not itself failure. It becomes culture lag when the fast layer changes the environment of action while slower layers continue authorizing, rewarding, teaching, or interpreting behavior as though the old environment remained.\n\nThe mismatch is coupled and self-reinforcing. Missing rules create workarounds; workarounds concentrate benefit and harm; institutions learn from visible users rather than excluded people; obsolete roles block responsibility; lack of remedy undermines legitimacy; and weak legitimacy slows reform. Single-layer interventions fail because each unchanged layer recreates the others. At the same time, indiscriminate acceleration destroys safeguards, memory, and plural values. The structural task is selective, legitimate catch-up, not speed for its own sake.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A fast-changing social or technical layer has altered the environment of action while slower institutional and cultural layers still authorize, reward, or interpret behavior under obsolete conditions."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "This branch preserves the complete remedy-free diagnostic route; goals, feasibility clauses, gates, deployment constraints, and supporting context remain outside the DNF."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Institutional lag necessarily has fast-changing material conditions and slower formal rules that retain an obsolete fit, which entails the complete condition.", "role_mapping": "Material conditions map to the fast layer; the formal institutional framework maps to the slower layer retaining old rules or roles.", "slug": "institutional_lag", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "Culture lag necessarily has coupled cultural components changing at different rates, with the slower component retaining an older configuration after the fast layer changes.", "role_mapping": "The leading cultural component maps to the fast layer; the dependent component maps to the slower cultural or institutional layer.", "slug": "culture_lag", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "ext001_culture_lag_response_a01", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored structural_problem, prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: A fast layer changes the environment of action while slower cultural or institutional layers retain old rules, roles, or interpretations.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A fast layer changes the environment of action while slower cultural or institutional layers retain old rules, roles, or interpretations."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Institutional Lag", "one_liner": "Formal institutions change slower than underlying conditions.", "page_ref": "prime:institutional_lag", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Material conditions map to the fast layer; the formal institutional framework maps to the slower layer retaining old rules or roles.", "slug": "institutional_lag", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Institutional lag necessarily has fast-changing material conditions and slower formal rules that retain an obsolete fit, which entails the complete condition."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Culture Lag", "one_liner": "Mismatch in cultural change rates.", "page_ref": "prime:culture_lag", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "The leading cultural component maps to the fast layer; the dependent component maps to the slower cultural or institutional layer.", "slug": "culture_lag", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Culture lag necessarily has coupled cultural components changing at different rates, with the slower component retaining an older configuration after the fast layer changes."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A fast layer changes the environment of action while slower cultural or institutional layers retain old rules, roles, or interpretations.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Tempo mismatch necessarily produces outcome degradation because two coupled clocks operate at incompatible rates, which entails identifiable harm from a rate mismatch.", "role_mapping": "The two clocks map to the fast-changing and slow-adapting layers; degradation maps to harm, missing responsibility, or blocked remedy.", "slug": "tempo_mismatch", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "ext001_culture_lag_response_a02", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored structural_problem, prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: The rate mismatch produces identifiable harm, missing responsibility, or blocked remedy.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The rate mismatch produces identifiable harm, missing responsibility, or blocked remedy."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Tempo Mismatch", "one_liner": "A system's pace of action is out of phase with the timescale of the environment it must respond to, so correct decisions degrade outcomes by arriving against a world that has already moved on (or one not yet ready to absorb them).", "page_ref": "prime:tempo_mismatch", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "The two clocks map to the fast-changing and slow-adapting layers; degradation maps to harm, missing responsibility, or blocked remedy.", "slug": "tempo_mismatch", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Tempo mismatch necessarily produces outcome degradation because two coupled clocks operate at incompatible rates, which entails identifiable harm from a rate mismatch."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The rate mismatch produces identifiable harm, missing responsibility, or blocked remedy.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "EXT001-C029", "dnf": [["EXT001-U029-O1"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"obligation_id": "EXT001-U029-O1", "predicate": "The lag spans coupled layers such that a one-layer adjustment would be recreated by the others."}], "predicate": "The lag spans coupled layers such that a one-layer adjustment would be recreated by the others.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "The lag spans coupled layers such that a one-layer adjustment would be recreated by the others.", "unit_id": "EXT001-U029"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"catalog_exhaustion": "CONDITION_LEVEL", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The lag spans coupled layers such that a one-layer adjustment would be recreated by the others.", "slug": "culture_lag"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The lag spans coupled layers such that a one-layer adjustment would be recreated by the others.", "slug": "institutional_lag"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The lag spans coupled layers such that a one-layer adjustment would be recreated by the others.", "slug": "common_medium_intermediation"}], "residual_id": "EXT001:culture_lag_response:C03", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding."}}, "condition_id": "ext001_culture_lag_response_a03", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored structural_problem, prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: The lag spans coupled layers such that a one-layer adjustment would be recreated by the others.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The lag spans coupled layers such that a one-layer adjustment would be recreated by the others."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The lag spans coupled layers such that a one-layer adjustment would be recreated by the others.", "slug": "culture_lag"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The lag spans coupled layers such that a one-layer adjustment would be recreated by the others.", "slug": "institutional_lag"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The lag spans coupled layers such that a one-layer adjustment would be recreated by the others.", "slug": "common_medium_intermediation"}], "normalized_requirement": "The lag spans coupled layers such that a one-layer adjustment would be recreated by the others.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The lag spans coupled layers such that a one-layer adjustment would be recreated by the others.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Legitimate selective catch-up can preserve safeguards and plural values.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored structural_problem, prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: Legitimate selective catch-up can preserve safeguards and plural values. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Legitimate selective catch-up can preserve safeguards and plural values.", "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored structural_problem, prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Legitimate selective catch-up can preserve safeguards and plural values."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"candidate_ledger_sha256": "96f72d2139077fd57bf795048ebef33b3fd574b20963170080ec916b5b3b92fe", "extension_id": "new-archetypes-extension-001", "ledger_id": "prime-production-v1.2-extension-001", "ledger_sha256": "9644520614744632d1d36da44b1acd77ce432852c6083eb871203521c166efce"}, "base_projection_sha256": "841e0c7f3cb8e8054475ad29a8a14745a416b4fc115559a44878b94292e673ec", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "ca09ed9fe1598ce7072755b530de5553f5ee0a7cd64ae82d9e4a4e2149a37788", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Curator-Selected Reusable Inventory Filter", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:curator_selected_reusable_inventory_filter", "slug": "curator_selected_reusable_inventory_filter"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "One ranking suppresses plural judgment, while unconstrained personal queries repeatedly\nrecreate the same expertise. Separate curator-owned copies preserve viewpoints but\nfracture identity, updates, provenance, and access control.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Several legitimate selection philosophies must coexist over one reusable inventory, while ad-hoc queries lose expert context and curator-owned copies fragment identity and provenance."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "This branch preserves the complete remedy-free diagnostic route; goals, feasibility clauses, gates, deployment constraints, and supporting context remain outside the DNF."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "EXT001-C030", "dnf": [["EXT001-U030-O1"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"obligation_id": "EXT001-U030-O1", "predicate": "Several legitimate selection philosophies must coexist over the same reusable inventory."}], "predicate": "Several legitimate selection philosophies must coexist over the same reusable inventory.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Several legitimate selection philosophies must coexist over the same reusable inventory.", "unit_id": "EXT001-U030"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"catalog_exhaustion": "CONDITION_LEVEL", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Several legitimate selection philosophies must coexist over the same reusable inventory.", "slug": "keynesian_beauty_contest"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Several legitimate selection philosophies must coexist over the same reusable inventory.", "slug": "criteria_of_individuation"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Several legitimate selection philosophies must coexist over the same reusable inventory.", "slug": "coordination_problem_and_equilibrium_selection"}], "residual_id": "EXT001:curator_selected_reusable_inventory_filter:C01", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding."}}, "condition_id": "ext001_curator_selected_reusable_inventory_filter_a01", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: Several legitimate selection philosophies must coexist over the same reusable inventory.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Several legitimate selection philosophies must coexist over the same reusable inventory."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Several legitimate selection philosophies must coexist over the same reusable inventory.", "slug": "keynesian_beauty_contest"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Several legitimate selection philosophies must coexist over the same reusable inventory.", "slug": "criteria_of_individuation"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Several legitimate selection philosophies must coexist over the same reusable inventory.", "slug": "coordination_problem_and_equilibrium_selection"}], "normalized_requirement": "Several legitimate selection philosophies must coexist over the same reusable inventory.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Several legitimate selection philosophies must coexist over the same reusable inventory.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "EXT001-C031", "dnf": [["EXT001-U031-O1"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"obligation_id": "EXT001-U031-O1", "predicate": "Ad-hoc personal queries repeatedly recreate selection expertise without preserving its rationale."}], "predicate": "Ad-hoc personal queries repeatedly recreate selection expertise without preserving its rationale.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Ad-hoc personal queries repeatedly recreate selection expertise without preserving its rationale.", "unit_id": "EXT001-U031"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"catalog_exhaustion": "CONDITION_LEVEL", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Ad-hoc personal queries repeatedly recreate selection expertise without preserving its rationale.", "slug": "search_and_retrieval"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Ad-hoc personal queries repeatedly recreate selection expertise without preserving its rationale.", "slug": "underspecification"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Ad-hoc personal queries repeatedly recreate selection expertise without preserving its rationale.", "slug": "exemplar_retrieval"}], "residual_id": "EXT001:curator_selected_reusable_inventory_filter:C02", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding."}}, "condition_id": "ext001_curator_selected_reusable_inventory_filter_a02", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: Ad-hoc personal queries repeatedly recreate selection expertise without preserving its rationale.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Ad-hoc personal queries repeatedly recreate selection expertise without preserving its rationale."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Ad-hoc personal queries repeatedly recreate selection expertise without preserving its rationale.", "slug": "search_and_retrieval"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Ad-hoc personal queries repeatedly recreate selection expertise without preserving its rationale.", "slug": "underspecification"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Ad-hoc personal queries repeatedly recreate selection expertise without preserving its rationale.", "slug": "exemplar_retrieval"}], "normalized_requirement": "Ad-hoc personal queries repeatedly recreate selection expertise without preserving its rationale.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Ad-hoc personal queries repeatedly recreate selection expertise without preserving its rationale.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "EXT001-C032", "dnf": [["EXT001-U032-O1"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"obligation_id": "EXT001-U032-O1", "predicate": "Separate curator-owned copies would fragment identity, updates, provenance, or access control."}], "predicate": "Separate curator-owned copies would fragment identity, updates, provenance, or access control.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Separate curator-owned copies would fragment identity, updates, provenance, or access control.", "unit_id": "EXT001-U032"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"catalog_exhaustion": "CONDITION_LEVEL", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Separate curator-owned copies would fragment identity, updates, provenance, or access control.", "slug": "reification"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Separate curator-owned copies would fragment identity, updates, provenance, or access control.", "slug": "provenance"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Separate curator-owned copies would fragment identity, updates, provenance, or access control.", "slug": "capability_separation"}], "residual_id": "EXT001:curator_selected_reusable_inventory_filter:C03", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding."}}, "condition_id": "ext001_curator_selected_reusable_inventory_filter_a03", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: Separate curator-owned copies would fragment identity, updates, provenance, or access control.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Separate curator-owned copies would fragment identity, updates, provenance, or access control."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Separate curator-owned copies would fragment identity, updates, provenance, or access control.", "slug": "reification"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Separate curator-owned copies would fragment identity, updates, provenance, or access control.", "slug": "provenance"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Separate curator-owned copies would fragment identity, updates, provenance, or access control.", "slug": "capability_separation"}], "normalized_requirement": "Separate curator-owned copies would fragment identity, updates, provenance, or access control.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Separate curator-owned copies would fragment identity, updates, provenance, or access control.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"candidate_ledger_sha256": "96f72d2139077fd57bf795048ebef33b3fd574b20963170080ec916b5b3b92fe", "extension_id": "new-archetypes-extension-001", "ledger_id": "prime-production-v1.2-extension-001", "ledger_sha256": "9644520614744632d1d36da44b1acd77ce432852c6083eb871203521c166efce"}, "base_projection_sha256": "841e0c7f3cb8e8054475ad29a8a14745a416b4fc115559a44878b94292e673ec", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "ca09ed9fe1598ce7072755b530de5553f5ee0a7cd64ae82d9e4a4e2149a37788", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Curiosity Gap Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:curiosity_gap_design", "slug": "curiosity_gap_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 4, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 5, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 6 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 4 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is not a lack of motivation in the abstract. It is a missing or poorly designed relationship between knowledge, uncertainty, relevance, and action. People may not see what is unknown, may not understand why the unknown matters, or may experience the unknown as too large, too risky, or too disconnected from their concerns.\n\nA common failure is premature explanation. The answer arrives before the gap is visible, so the answer has no pull. Another failure is fake mystery: attention is captured, but the unknown does not lead to exploration or learning. A third failure is unbounded exploration, where people are asked to investigate but receive no first step, scope, safety boundary, or way to use what they find.\n\nCuriosity Gap Design solves this by making the unknown specific and purposeful. It defines what is missing, why that missing piece matters, where exploration can happen, how to begin, and how discoveries feed the next cycle.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "People do not explore because the unknown is invisible, too vague, too threatening, too disconnected from their purpose, or already over-explained before they have a chance to wonder. Inquiry is replaced by passivity, compliance, shallow attention, or premature closure."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P024-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an audience or equivalent inquirer as the focal actor.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An audience is the actor expected to pursue inquiry.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a question or equivalent bounded inquiry target, not motivation in general.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A question is the missing inquiry target.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require absence of a sufficiently clear question rather than low interest in a clear question.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The audience has no question clear enough to pursue.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must link question clarity to the audience's ability to pursue inquiry.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Pursuit is the activity blocked by the missing clarity.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "The audience has no clear question to pursue.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An audience lacks a clear, pursuable question.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P024-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Curiosity can be active around a clear information gap and does not entail absence of a question.", "slug": "curiosity"}], "residual_id": "r:curiosity_gap_design:b019_a04_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b019_a04_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when explanations are landing flat because the audience has not yet felt the question the explanation answers. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The audience has no clear question to pursue.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The audience has no clear question to pursue.", "It is especially useful when explanations are landing flat because the audience has not yet felt the question the explanation answers."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Curiosity can be active around a clear information gap and does not entail absence of a question.", "slug": "curiosity"}], "normalized_requirement": "The audience has no clear question to pursue.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The audience has no clear question to pursue.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A curiosity-inducing information gap can be bounded, safe, and tractable rather than overwhelming.", "slug": "curiosity"}], "residual_id": "r:curiosity_gap_design:b019_a04_c2", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b019_a04_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "People may not see what is unknown, may not understand why the unknown matters, or may experience the unknown as too large, too risky, or too disconnected from their concerns. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The unknown feels too broad, risky, embarrassing, or ambiguous.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The unknown feels too broad, risky, embarrassing, or ambiguous.", "People may not see what is unknown, may not understand why the unknown matters, or may experience the unknown as too large, too risky, or too disconnected from their concerns."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A curiosity-inducing information gap can be bounded, safe, and tractable rather than overwhelming.", "slug": "curiosity"}], "normalized_requirement": "The unknown feels too broad, risky, embarrassing, or ambiguous.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The unknown feels too broad, risky, embarrassing, or ambiguous.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "A deliberately bounded, relevant, and temporarily unresolved information gap is used to generate inquiry and feed an iterative learning loop.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A deliberately bounded, relevant, and temporarily unresolved information gap is used to generate inquiry and feed an iterative learning loop.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P024-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an audience or equivalent inquirer as the focal actor.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An audience is the actor expected to pursue inquiry.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a question or equivalent bounded inquiry target, not motivation in general.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A question is the missing inquiry target.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require absence of a sufficiently clear question rather than low interest in a clear question.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The audience has no question clear enough to pursue.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must link question clarity to the audience's ability to pursue inquiry.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Pursuit is the activity blocked by the missing clarity.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "The audience has no clear question to pursue.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An audience lacks a clear, pursuable question.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P024-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Curiosity can be active around a clear information gap and does not entail absence of a question.", "slug": "curiosity"}], "residual_id": "r:curiosity_gap_design:b019_a04_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b019_a04_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when explanations are landing flat because the audience has not yet felt the question the explanation answers. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The audience has no clear question to pursue.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The audience has no clear question to pursue.", "It is especially useful when explanations are landing flat because the audience has not yet felt the question the explanation answers."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Curiosity can be active around a clear information gap and does not entail absence of a question.", "slug": "curiosity"}], "normalized_requirement": "The audience has no clear question to pursue.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The audience has no clear question to pursue.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P024-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a recipient for whom relevance would need to be apparent.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An audience or intended user is the relevance evaluator.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require disconnection from relevance rather than merely modest usefulness.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The focal object lacks a connection to relevance for that audience.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve legible or apparent relevance, not relevance knowable only to an external designer.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The missing relevance would need to be visible to the audience.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires instructional, informational, or equivalent material as the disconnected object.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Material is the focal object lacking visible relevance.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a problem or task as the disconnected object.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "A problem is the focal object lacking visible relevance.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}], "predicate": "The material or problem is disconnected from visible relevance.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Material or a problem lacks a visible relevance connection for its audience.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P024-C08-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Curiosity can attach to intrinsically interesting material with clear relevance and does not entail disconnection.", "slug": "curiosity"}], "residual_id": "r:curiosity_gap_design:b019_a04_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b019_a04_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The material or problem is disconnected from visible relevance. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The material or problem is disconnected from visible relevance."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "I tested introduced material that actually bears on the open question. The exact record classifies that as legitimate reframing or clarification, so it is not a red herring; no counterexample to the material branch survives.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Red Herring", "one_liner": "Deflect a discussion by introducing material irrelevant to the open question, so attention and the conversational floor shift to the new topic and the original question is left feeling-addressed-but-unanswered — the test being whether the new material does any work on the claim that was open.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:red_herring", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "red_herring"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "red_herring", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P024-C08-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every complete red-herring instance introduces informational material that does no work on the audience’s open question. Actual irrelevance is stronger than the unit’s absent visible-relevance connection, so the material DNF branch is universally entailed."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The material or problem is disconnected from visible relevance.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "A deliberately bounded, relevant, and temporarily unresolved information gap is used to generate inquiry and feed an iterative learning loop.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A deliberately bounded, relevant, and temporarily unresolved information gap is used to generate inquiry and feed an iterative learning loop.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Curiosity requires a felt gap and therefore does not entail an answer delivered before the gap is experienced.", "slug": "curiosity"}], "residual_id": "r:curiosity_gap_design:b019_a04_c4", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b019_a04_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when explanations are landing flat because the audience has not yet felt the question the explanation answers. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The answer is delivered before the gap is felt.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The answer is delivered before the gap is felt.", "It is especially useful when explanations are landing flat because the audience has not yet felt the question the explanation answers."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Curiosity requires a felt gap and therefore does not entail an answer delivered before the gap is experienced.", "slug": "curiosity"}], "normalized_requirement": "The answer is delivered before the gap is felt.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The answer is delivered before the gap is felt.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "A deliberately bounded, relevant, and temporarily unresolved information gap is used to generate inquiry and feed an iterative learning loop.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A deliberately bounded, relevant, and temporarily unresolved information gap is used to generate inquiry and feed an iterative learning loop.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P024-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve exploration or inquiry as the activity generating the outputs.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Exploration is the process producing outputs.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail production of fragments rather than merely incomplete knowledge or the possibility of fragmented output.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The exploration produces fragmentary outputs.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Exploration produces fragments.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Exploration produces fragmentary outputs.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P024-C09-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P024-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve exploration or inquiry as the focal process whose feedback organization is assessed.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Exploration is the process assessed for learning-loop formation.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require absence of an iterative learning loop arising from the exploration, not merely weak or incomplete learning.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The exploration does not form a learning loop.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Exploration forms no learning loop.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Exploration fails to form a learning loop.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P024-C09-U2"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Constructivist learning can contain an effective feedback loop and does not require fragmentary unsuccessful exploration.", "slug": "constructivist_learning"}], "residual_id": "r:curiosity_gap_design:b019_a04_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b019_a04_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Another failure is fake mystery: attention is captured, but the unknown does not lead to exploration or learning. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Exploration produces fragments but no learning loop.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Exploration produces fragments but no learning loop.", "Another failure is fake mystery: attention is captured, but the unknown does not lead to exploration or learning."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 2, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 2}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Constructivist learning can contain an effective feedback loop and does not require fragmentary unsuccessful exploration.", "slug": "constructivist_learning"}], "normalized_requirement": "Exploration produces fragments but no learning loop.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 2 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Exploration produces fragments but no learning loop.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "A deliberately bounded, relevant, and temporarily unresolved information gap is used to generate inquiry and feed an iterative learning loop.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A deliberately bounded, relevant, and temporarily unresolved information gap is used to generate inquiry and feed an iterative learning loop.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 19, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-019", "ledger_sha256": "58156252558001ee8819c0176a1fcde7974c6d0268e7e7da184436d67b8e4ead"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Cycle Breaking", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:cycle_breaking", "slug": "cycle_breaking"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 5 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A harmful cycle persists because the loop has a regeneration mechanism. The end state of one pass leaves a residue: backlog, shame, debt, unresolved harm, unfinished cleanup, misaligned incentive, environmental cue, or institutional default. That residue becomes the start state for the next pass.\n\nThe visible crisis is often late in the loop. By the time the relapse, outage, argument, overdraft, backlog crash, or defect appears, the cycle has already regenerated. Cycle Breaking shifts attention upstream to the preconditions that make recurrence likely.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A harmful state, behavior, failure, or interaction recurs because the end of one cycle creates the triggers, incentives, constraints, or unresolved conditions that produce the next cycle."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Recurrence is valence-neutral and can describe a beneficial or harmless returning state.", "slug": "recurrence"}], "residual_id": "r:cycle_breaking:b019_a05_c1", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b019_a05_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The harmful pattern has repeated more than once. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The harmful pattern has repeated more than once."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Recurrence is valence-neutral and can describe a beneficial or harmless returning state.", "slug": "recurrence"}], "normalized_requirement": "The harmful pattern has repeated more than once.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The harmful pattern has repeated more than once.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P024-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a bounded pass or iteration with an identifiable completion.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A process pass is the cycle segment that ends.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the next-pass temporal ordering rather than a static graph cycle.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A successor pass follows the completed pass.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail regeneration by the completion event, not mere recurrence from an independent clock.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The end of the first pass creates the successor pass.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "The end of one pass creates the next pass.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Completion of one process pass regenerates the next pass.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P024-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A static network cycle can be a closed path with no temporal pass, completion event, or regeneration of a subsequent pass.", "slug": "cycle"}], "residual_id": "r:cycle_breaking:b019_a05_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b019_a05_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "That residue becomes the start state for the next pass. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The end of one pass creates the next pass.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The end of one pass creates the next pass.", "That residue becomes the start state for the next pass."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A static network cycle can be a closed path with no temporal pass, completion event, or regeneration of a subsequent pass.", "slug": "cycle"}], "normalized_requirement": "The end of one pass creates the next pass.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The end of one pass creates the next pass.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P024-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an observable failure as the later focal outcome.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A visible failure is the downstream outcome.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an earlier point that regenerates the cycle, not an arbitrary prior event.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A regeneration point is the earlier upstream reference point.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the earlier-to-later ordering.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The regeneration point occurs earlier than the visible failure.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail a directed downstream connection from the regeneration point to the failure rather than temporal precedence alone; exclusive origination is not required.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The visible failure lies downstream from the regeneration point.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "A visible failure is downstream from an earlier regeneration point.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A visible failure lies downstream from an earlier regeneration point.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P024-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A cycle can be harmless and need not contain a visible failure or a distinguishable regeneration point upstream from it.", "slug": "cycle"}], "residual_id": "r:cycle_breaking:b019_a05_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b019_a05_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A visible failure is downstream from an earlier regeneration point. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A visible failure is downstream from an earlier regeneration point."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Removing the favorable-evaluation-to-another-pilot regeneration relation destroys pilot purgatory; every complete instance therefore places the visible no-scale failure downstream of that earlier point.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Pilot Purgatory", "one_liner": "Relocate the diagnosis of an initiative that keeps running successful pilots without ever scaling from 'weak evidence' to 'a missing transition mechanism' — the loop is sustained by each pilot's local success, and the fault sits one level up in the decision infrastructure.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:pilot_purgatory", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "pilot_purgatory"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "pilot_purgatory", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P024-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "Pilot purgatory directly carries a visible later failure to scale, an earlier favorable evaluation that regenerates the demonstration loop, their ordering, and the directed downstream relation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A visible failure is downstream from an earlier regeneration point.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Withdrawal rebound can follow removal of a stimulatory or otherwise nonsuppressive input and need not concern direct suppression of a harmful cycle.", "slug": "withdrawal_rebound"}], "residual_id": "r:cycle_breaking:b019_a05_c4", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b019_a05_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Direct suppression has not lasted. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Direct suppression has not lasted."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Withdrawal rebound can follow removal of a stimulatory or otherwise nonsuppressive input and need not concern direct suppression of a harmful cycle.", "slug": "withdrawal_rebound"}], "normalized_requirement": "Direct suppression has not lasted.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Direct suppression has not lasted.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A branching structure can offer alternatives unrelated to the harmful cycle, and a cycle need not have an alternate path.", "slug": "branching_and_merging"}], "residual_id": "r:cycle_breaking:b019_a05_c5", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b019_a05_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: There is a plausible alternate pathway. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["There is a plausible alternate pathway."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A branching structure can offer alternatives unrelated to the harmful cycle, and a cycle need not have an alternate path.", "slug": "branching_and_merging"}], "normalized_requirement": "There is a plausible alternate pathway.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "There is a plausible alternate pathway.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Recurrence can be monitored over the next expected window.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Predictability means there is likely an intervention window before recurrence becomes unavoidable. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: Recurrence can be monitored over the next expected window. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Recurrence can be monitored over the next expected window.", "Predictability means there is likely an intervention window before recurrence becomes unavoidable."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Recurrence can be monitored over the next expected window."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 19, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-019", "ledger_sha256": "58156252558001ee8819c0176a1fcde7974c6d0268e7e7da184436d67b8e4ead"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Cycle Efficiency and Reversibility Assessment", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:cycle_efficiency_and_reversibility_assessment", "slug": "cycle_efficiency_and_reversibility_assessment"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 5 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A repeated process consumes inputs and returns an output or reset state, but the process is not evaluated against a reversible or least-loss reference. Irreversible loss points, hidden sinks, degraded stocks, and boundary transfers are treated as incidental costs rather than as structural features that determine cycle efficiency and long-run sustainability.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A repeated process consumes inputs and returns an output or reset state, but the process is not evaluated against a reversible or least-loss reference. Irreversible loss points, hidden sinks, degraded stocks, and boundary transfers are treated as incidental costs rather than as structural features that determine cycle efficiency and long-run sustainability."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P024-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an operational process rather than a purely geometric closed path.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An operational process is the entity that repeats.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require multiple passes or recurrence, not one linear execution.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The process traverses the cycle repeatedly.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve return to a repeatable process state or phase ordering.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The repeated phases are organized as a cycle.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve resource, transformation, output, recovery, recharge, reset, reuse, or structurally equivalent operational phases.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The cycle contains operational state-changing or restorative phases.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "A process repeats through cycles of input, transformation, output, recovery, recharge, reset, or reuse.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An operational process repeatedly traverses a cycle of state-changing or restorative phases.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P024-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Oscillation can be a state cycling around equilibrium without input, transformation, output, recovery, recharge, reset, or reuse stages.", "slug": "oscillation"}], "residual_id": "r:cycle_efficiency_and_reversibility_assessment:b019_a06_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b019_a06_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A repeated process consumes inputs and returns an output or reset state, but the process is not evaluated against a reversible or least-loss reference. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A process repeats through cycles of input, transformation, output, recovery, recharge, reset, or reuse.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A process repeats through cycles of input, transformation, output, recovery, recharge, reset, or reuse.", "A repeated process consumes inputs and returns an output or reset state, but the process is not evaluated against a reversible or least-loss reference."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A procedure that did not re-run its compare-select-apply/subgoal phases, or whose operators did not change state, would not instantiate the exact means-end mechanism.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Means-End Analysis", "one_liner": "A greedy problem-solving heuristic that repeatedly finds the most significant difference between the current and goal states, applies the operator that most reduces it, and recurses on any unmet preconditions as sub-goals.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:means_end_analysis", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "means_end_analysis"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "means_end_analysis", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P024-C12-U1", "why_it_fits": "Means-end analysis directly entails a repeatedly traversed operational loop whose ordered phases compare state, choose and apply a state-changing operator, and re-run on the updated goal gap."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A process repeats through cycles of input, transformation, output, recovery, recharge, reset, or reuse.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P024-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O9"], ["O1", "O2", "O10"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a cyclic process that provides the index for accumulation.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A process undergoes repeated operational cycles.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require cycle-by-cycle accumulation rather than a one-time loss or continuous noncyclic decay.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The loss increases with each cycle.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires waste heat to accumulate per cycle.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Waste heat is the accumulating loss.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires scrap to accumulate per cycle.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Scrap is the accumulating loss.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires rework burden to accumulate per cycle.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Rework is the accumulating loss.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires waiting burden to accumulate per cycle.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "Waiting is the accumulating loss.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires material degradation to accumulate per cycle.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "Degraded material is the accumulating loss.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires information loss to accumulate per cycle.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "Lost information is the accumulating loss.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires irreversible commitments to accumulate per cycle.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "Irreversible commitment is the accumulating loss.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires capacity loss to accumulate per cycle.", "obligation_id": "O10", "statement": "Capacity loss is the accumulating loss.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Waste heat, scrap, rework, waiting, degraded material, lost information, irreversible commitment, or capacity loss accumulates with each cycle.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A listed form of loss accumulates with each operational cycle.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P024-C13-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Temporal degradation need not be cycle-indexed and can progress continuously without per-cycle accumulation.", "slug": "temporal_decay_and_degradation"}], "residual_id": "r:cycle_efficiency_and_reversibility_assessment:b019_a06_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b019_a06_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Irreversible loss points, hidden sinks, degraded stocks, and boundary transfers are treated as incidental costs rather than as structural features that determine cycle efficiency and long-run sustainability. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Waste heat, scrap, rework, waiting, degraded material, lost information, irreversible commitment, or capacity loss accumulates with each cycle.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Waste heat, scrap, rework, waiting, degraded material, lost information, irreversible commitment, or capacity loss accumulates with each cycle.", "Irreversible loss points, hidden sinks, degraded stocks, and boundary transfers are treated as incidental costs rather than as structural features that determine cycle efficiency and long-run sustainability."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Temporal degradation need not be cycle-indexed and can progress continuously without per-cycle accumulation.", "slug": "temporal_decay_and_degradation"}], "normalized_requirement": "Waste heat, scrap, rework, waiting, degraded material, lost information, irreversible commitment, or capacity loss accumulates with each cycle.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Waste heat, scrap, rework, waiting, degraded material, lost information, irreversible commitment, or capacity loss accumulates with each cycle.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P024-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O9"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a process with high throughput as the affected system.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A high-throughput process is the system being driven.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the directional increase in distance from equilibrium.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The process is pushed farther from equilibrium.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve actuality rather than risk, possibility, or a proposed future push.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The push away from equilibrium is actually occurring.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve onset during the ongoing directional change.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The adverse consequence begins as the process is pushed farther away.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail the directed causal relation from disequilibrium forcing to the outcome.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The push farther from equilibrium generates the adverse consequence.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires instability as the generated effect.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The generated consequence is instability.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires degradation as the generated effect.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The generated consequence is degradation.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires oscillation as the generated effect.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The generated consequence is oscillation.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires avoidable waste as the generated effect.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "The generated consequence is avoidable waste.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "A high-throughput process is being pushed farther from equilibrium and begins to generate instability, degradation, oscillation, or avoidable waste.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An ongoing push of a high-throughput process farther from equilibrium begins generating a listed adverse consequence.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P024-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A system can exceed carrying capacity without being a cyclic high-throughput process pushed farther from equilibrium.", "slug": "carrying_capacity"}], "residual_id": "r:cycle_efficiency_and_reversibility_assessment:b019_a06_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b019_a06_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A high-throughput process is being pushed farther from equilibrium and begins to generate instability, degradation, oscillation, or avoidable waste. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A high-throughput process is being pushed farther from equilibrium and begins to generate instability, degradation, oscillation, or avoidable waste."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A system can exceed carrying capacity without being a cyclic high-throughput process pushed farther from equilibrium.", "slug": "carrying_capacity"}], "normalized_requirement": "A high-throughput process is being pushed farther from equilibrium and begins to generate instability, degradation, oscillation, or avoidable waste.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A high-throughput process is being pushed farther from equilibrium and begins to generate instability, degradation, oscillation, or avoidable waste.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P024-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a closure claim rather than establish that the loop is genuinely self-contained.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The loop is claimed to be closed.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require the external element for continued loop operation or burden disposal.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Operation of the loop depends on an external support or sink.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve exclusion of the dependency from the boundary used for the closure claim.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The external dependency lies outside the loop's reported boundary.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires cleanup supplied outside the reported boundary.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The omitted dependency is external cleanup.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires replacement inputs supplied outside the reported boundary.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The omitted dependency is replacement input.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires maintenance supplied outside the reported boundary.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The omitted dependency is maintenance.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires labor supplied outside the reported boundary.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The omitted dependency is labor.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires an environmental sink outside the reported boundary.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The omitted dependency is an environmental sink.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "A claimed closed loop depends on external cleanup, replacement inputs, maintenance, labor, or environmental sinks that are outside the reported boundary.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A loop claimed to be closed depends on a listed external support omitted from its reported boundary.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P024-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A mathematical or operational cycle can be genuinely closed and need not omit external supports from a reported boundary.", "slug": "cycle"}], "residual_id": "r:cycle_efficiency_and_reversibility_assessment:b019_a06_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b019_a06_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Irreversible loss points, hidden sinks, degraded stocks, and boundary transfers are treated as incidental costs rather than as structural features that determine cycle efficiency and long-run sustainability. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A claimed closed loop depends on external cleanup, replacement inputs, maintenance, labor, or environmental sinks that are outside the reported boundary.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A claimed closed loop depends on external cleanup, replacement inputs, maintenance, labor, or environmental sinks that are outside the reported boundary.", "Irreversible loss points, hidden sinks, degraded stocks, and boundary transfers are treated as incidental costs rather than as structural features that determine cycle efficiency and long-run sustainability."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A mathematical or operational cycle can be genuinely closed and need not omit external supports from a reported boundary.", "slug": "cycle"}], "normalized_requirement": "A claimed closed loop depends on external cleanup, replacement inputs, maintenance, labor, or environmental sinks that are outside the reported boundary.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A claimed closed loop depends on external cleanup, replacement inputs, maintenance, labor, or environmental sinks that are outside the reported boundary.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P025-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a design or designed process as the focal object of comparison.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A design is the object being evaluated.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve actual comparison against prevailing practice, not merely mention present conditions.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Current practice is the design’s comparison baseline.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require current practice to be the exclusive baseline rather than one baseline among several.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The comparison is restricted only to current practice.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require exclusion of theoretical limits from the design comparison.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Theoretical limits are an omitted alternative reference.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require exclusion of best-available benchmark performance from the design comparison.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Best-available benchmarks are an omitted alternative reference.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require exclusion of reversible reference behavior from the design comparison.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "Reversible reference behavior is an omitted alternative reference.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "A design is compared only to current practice rather than to theoretical limits, best-available benchmarks, or reversible reference behavior.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A design is compared only with current practice instead of all three named alternative references.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P025-C01-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An external analytic challenge can use rigorous theoretical benchmarks and does not entail a current-practice-only comparison.", "slug": "external_analytic_challenge"}], "residual_id": "r:cycle_efficiency_and_reversibility_assessment:b019_a06_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b019_a06_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A repeated process consumes inputs and returns an output or reset state, but the process is not evaluated against a reversible or least-loss reference. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A design is compared only to current practice rather than to theoretical limits, best-available benchmarks, or reversible reference behavior.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A design is compared only to current practice rather than to theoretical limits, best-available benchmarks, or reversible reference behavior.", "A repeated process consumes inputs and returns an output or reset state, but the process is not evaluated against a reversible or least-loss reference."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An external analytic challenge can use rigorous theoretical benchmarks and does not entail a current-practice-only comparison.", "slug": "external_analytic_challenge"}], "normalized_requirement": "A design is compared only to current practice rather than to theoretical limits, best-available benchmarks, or reversible reference behavior.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A design is compared only to current practice rather than to theoretical limits, best-available benchmarks, or reversible reference behavior.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The team cares about energy, material, time, capacity, fidelity, throughput, or cost efficiency across many repetitions, not just one successful run.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The team cares about energy, material, time, capacity, fidelity, throughput, or cost efficiency across many repetitions, not just one successful run. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The team cares about energy, material, time, capacity, fidelity, throughput, or cost efficiency across many repetitions, not just one successful run."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "The team cares about energy, material, time, capacity, fidelity, throughput, or cost efficiency across many repetitions, not just one successful run."}, {"display_text": "Round-trip performance matters, such as charge-discharge, store-retrieve, heat-pump, recycle-remanufacture, request-response-reset, or approve-execute-audit cycles.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Round-trip performance matters, such as charge-discharge, store-retrieve, heat-pump, recycle-remanufacture, request-response-reset, or approve-execute-audit cycles. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Round-trip performance matters, such as charge-discharge, store-retrieve, heat-pump, recycle-remanufacture, request-response-reset, or approve-execute-audit cycles."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "Round-trip performance matters, such as charge-discharge, store-retrieve, heat-pump, recycle-remanufacture, request-response-reset, or approve-execute-audit cycles."}, {"display_text": "Losses recur often enough that small improvements compound into large resource, cost, or reliability gains.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Losses recur often enough that small improvements compound into large resource, cost, or reliability gains. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Losses recur often enough that small improvements compound into large resource, cost, or reliability gains."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 8, "text": "Losses recur often enough that small improvements compound into large resource, cost, or reliability gains."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 19, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-019", "ledger_sha256": "58156252558001ee8819c0176a1fcde7974c6d0268e7e7da184436d67b8e4ead"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Cycle Phase Alignment", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:cycle_phase_alignment", "slug": "cycle_phase_alignment"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 4 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is **phase mismatch among interacting cycles**. A producer cycle, decision cycle, resource cycle, review cycle, or action cycle has a rhythm that does not meet the receiving cycle at the point where action is possible.\n\nThis differs from simple lateness. Lateness may be a one-time execution failure. Phase mismatch is recurring: the same evidence, resource, approval, or output repeatedly arrives too early, too late, or with too much variance relative to the cycle that needs it.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Multiple recurring processes interact, but their relative timing is out of phase, so outputs, resources, decisions, or attention arrive before they can be used, after the window has closed, or in a sequence that creates waiting, waste, rework, or missed opportunities."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires multiple independent oscillators whose relative phases interact to determine coherence or interference.", "role_mapping": "Recurring cycles -> oscillators; interact -> phase relationship.", "slug": "temporal_synchronization_and_phase_alignment", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime requires independent oscillating processes coupled through local timing influence.", "role_mapping": "Cycles -> oscillators; interact -> local coupling.", "slug": "synchronization", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b019_a07_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The structural problem is **phase mismatch among interacting cycles**. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: At least two recurring cycles interact.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["At least two recurring cycles interact", "The structural problem is **phase mismatch among interacting cycles**."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Temporal Synchronization and Phase Alignment", "one_liner": "Phase alignment or misalignment determines efficiency and coherence.", "page_ref": "prime:temporal_synchronization_and_phase_alignment", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Recurring cycles -> oscillators; interact -> phase relationship.", "slug": "temporal_synchronization_and_phase_alignment", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires multiple independent oscillators whose relative phases interact to determine coherence or interference."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Synchronization", "one_liner": "The emergence of stable shared timing or phase among independent oscillating processes through local coupling, without any central conductor.", "page_ref": "prime:synchronization", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Cycles -> oscillators; interact -> local coupling.", "slug": "synchronization", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires independent oscillating processes coupled through local timing influence."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "At least two recurring cycles interact.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Kairos identifies opportune timing but need not involve a recurring receiving cycle.", "slug": "kairos"}], "residual_id": "r:cycle_phase_alignment:b019_a07_c2", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b019_a07_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A producer cycle, decision cycle, resource cycle, review cycle, or action cycle has a rhythm that does not meet the receiving cycle at the point where action is possible. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The receiving cycle has a usable window.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The receiving cycle has a usable window", "A producer cycle, decision cycle, resource cycle, review cycle, or action cycle has a rhythm that does not meet the receiving cycle at the point where action is possible."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Kairos identifies opportune timing but need not involve a recurring receiving cycle.", "slug": "kairos"}], "normalized_requirement": "The receiving cycle has a usable window.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The receiving cycle has a usable window.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P025-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve at least two recurring processes whose timing can be assessed jointly.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Multiple cycles are under comparison.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve local timing adequacy rather than merely the existence of cycles.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Each cycle is locally reasonable when assessed on its own.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require joint phase or timing misalignment, not independent local defects.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The cycles are mistimed relative to one another.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the contrast in which individually reasonable cycles nevertheless fail jointly.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Local reasonableness coexists with joint mistiming.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "The cycles are locally reasonable but jointly mistimed.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Multiple cycles are individually reasonable but mistimed relative to one another.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P025-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime also includes correctly aligned cycles and does not require a prior jointly mistimed state.", "slug": "temporal_synchronization_and_phase_alignment"}], "residual_id": "r:cycle_phase_alignment:b019_a07_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b019_a07_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The pattern is especially useful when each cycle looks reasonable in isolation but the combined system produces recurrent waiting, staleness, missed windows, or rework. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The cycles are locally reasonable but jointly mistimed.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The cycles are locally reasonable but jointly mistimed", "The pattern is especially useful when each cycle looks reasonable in isolation but the combined system produces recurrent waiting, staleness, missed windows, or rework."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime also includes correctly aligned cycles and does not require a prior jointly mistimed state.", "slug": "temporal_synchronization_and_phase_alignment"}], "normalized_requirement": "The cycles are locally reasonable but jointly mistimed.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The cycles are locally reasonable but jointly mistimed.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Tempo mismatch can cause a single consequential failure and need not recur or involve interacting cycles.", "slug": "tempo_mismatch"}], "residual_id": "r:cycle_phase_alignment:b019_a07_c5", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b019_a07_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The cost of mismatch recurs. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The cost of mismatch recurs"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Tempo mismatch can cause a single consequential failure and need not recur or involve interacting cycles.", "slug": "tempo_mismatch"}], "normalized_requirement": "The cost of mismatch recurs.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The cost of mismatch recurs.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Timing can be adjusted or buffered.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: Timing can be adjusted or buffered. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Timing can be adjusted or buffered"]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Timing can be adjusted or buffered"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 19, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-019", "ledger_sha256": "58156252558001ee8819c0176a1fcde7974c6d0268e7e7da184436d67b8e4ead"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Cycle Staggering", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:cycle_staggering", "slug": "cycle_staggering"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is synchronized peak demand. Multiple cycles independently choose the same convenient or conventional timing, then compete for the same resource: staff, servers, buses, rooms, roads, decision attention, maintenance capacity, support teams, or public infrastructure.\n\nThis creates a pattern of scarcity followed by idleness. The system may be quiet between peaks, then suddenly congested when recurring cycles overlap. Local owners may not see the problem because each cycle looks rational in isolation. The harm appears at the shared boundary.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Several recurring processes, obligations, signals, maintenance windows, releases, jobs, or demand cycles peak in the same time window, causing avoidable overload, congestion, queuing, service degradation, coordination conflict, or resource scarcity."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P025-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve multiple distinct cycles rather than one recurring state or process.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "More than one cycle is present.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require repeated occurrence of the cycles rather than one-time processes.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Each cycle recurs.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve uncoupled or separately determined recurrence rather than synchronized or jointly scheduled cycles.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The cycles recur independently of one another.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Multiple cycles recur independently.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Multiple cycles recur independently.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P025-C04-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Recurrence can describe one state process and does not require multiple independent cycles.", "slug": "recurrence"}], "residual_id": "r:cycle_staggering:b019_a08_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b019_a08_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Multiple cycles independently choose the same convenient or conventional timing, then compete for the same resource: staff, servers, buses, rooms, roads, decision attention, maintenance capacity, support teams, or public infrastructure. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Multiple cycles recur independently.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Multiple cycles recur independently", "Multiple cycles independently choose the same convenient or conventional timing, then compete for the same resource: staff, servers, buses, rooms, roads, decision attention, maintenance capacity, support teams, or public infrastructure."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "The closest counterexample would be an unsegmented fault or noncharacteristic rupture regime, but the exact record expressly excludes that regime from valid seismic-gap instances.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Seismic Gap", "one_liner": "Read prolonged silence on a fault segment as accumulated strain rather than safety — a renewal-process inference that ranks segments overdue against their recurrence interval as highest-hazard, valid only where segmentation and characteristic-recurrence hold.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:seismic_gap", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "seismic_gap"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "seismic_gap", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P025-C04-U1", "why_it_fits": "Retained under universal necessity: the exact record necessarily satisfies complete DNF branch O1+O2+O3 under the subtype-preserving role mapping."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Multiple cycles recur independently.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A recurrent process can lack a stable identifiable peak phase.", "slug": "recurrence"}], "residual_id": "r:cycle_staggering:b019_a08_c2", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b019_a08_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The strongest cases have visible recurrence, identifiable peak windows, a shared capacity constraint, and enough authority to move at least some cycle phases. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The cycles have identifiable peak phases.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The cycles have identifiable peak phases", "The strongest cases have visible recurrence, identifiable peak windows, a shared capacity constraint, and enough authority to move at least some cycle phases."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A recurrent process can lack a stable identifiable peak phase.", "slug": "recurrence"}], "normalized_requirement": "The cycles have identifiable peak phases.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The cycles have identifiable peak phases.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires multiple consumers' demand peaks to coincide on one finite shared resource and create joint exceedance.", "role_mapping": "Peaks -> tail demand; compete -> simultaneous draws; constrained resource -> finite shared capacity.", "slug": "correlated_capacity_demand", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b019_a08_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Local actors prefer convenient, familiar, or conventionally synchronized timing, while the shared system needs peaks separated enough to preserve capacity and avoid congestion. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Peaks compete for a shared constrained resource.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Peaks compete for a shared constrained resource", "Local actors prefer convenient, familiar, or conventionally synchronized timing, while the shared system needs peaks separated enough to preserve capacity and avoid congestion."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Correlated Capacity Demand", "one_liner": "When demands on a shared finite resource are tail-correlated rather than independent, capacity sized for independent peaks fails at the rare joint exceedance.", "page_ref": "prime:correlated_capacity_demand", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Peaks -> tail demand; compete -> simultaneous draws; constrained resource -> finite shared capacity.", "slug": "correlated_capacity_demand", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires multiple consumers' demand peaks to coincide on one finite shared resource and create joint exceedance."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Peaks compete for a shared constrained resource.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Relative phase can be structurally fixed, and the prime does not guarantee that overlap is avoidable.", "slug": "temporal_synchronization_and_phase_alignment"}], "residual_id": "r:cycle_staggering:b019_a08_c4", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b019_a08_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The conflict is between local schedule convenience and system-level peak overlap. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Peak overlap is not intrinsically necessary.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Peak overlap is not intrinsically necessary", "The conflict is between local schedule convenience and system-level peak overlap."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Relative phase can be structurally fixed, and the prime does not guarantee that overlap is avoidable.", "slug": "temporal_synchronization_and_phase_alignment"}], "normalized_requirement": "Peak overlap is not intrinsically necessary.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Peak overlap is not intrinsically necessary.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A common external stressor can force correlated demand peaks that cannot be staggered or separated by the system.", "slug": "correlated_capacity_demand"}], "residual_id": "r:cycle_staggering:b019_a08_c5", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b019_a08_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The total load is more manageable when separated. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The total load is more manageable when separated"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A common external stressor can force correlated demand peaks that cannot be staggered or separated by the system.", "slug": "correlated_capacity_demand"}], "normalized_requirement": "The total load is more manageable when separated.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The total load is more manageable when separated.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "There is enough authority to set offsets.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The strongest cases have visible recurrence, identifiable peak windows, a shared capacity constraint, and enough authority to move at least some cycle phases. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: There is enough authority to set offsets. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["There is enough authority to set offsets", "The strongest cases have visible recurrence, identifiable peak windows, a shared capacity constraint, and enough authority to move at least some cycle phases."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "There is enough authority to set offsets"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 19, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-019", "ledger_sha256": "58156252558001ee8819c0176a1fcde7974c6d0268e7e7da184436d67b8e4ead"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Cyclic Dominance Counterbalancing", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:cyclic_dominance_counterbalancing", "slug": "cyclic_dominance_counterbalancing"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 5 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Decision makers or adaptive systems treat a nontransitive advantage cycle as though it were a simple ranking, causing premature elimination, overcommitment to a temporary winner, predictable exploitation, or collapse of the diversity that makes the cycle stable.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Decision makers or adaptive systems treat a nontransitive advantage cycle as though it were a simple ranking, causing premature elimination, overcommitment to a temporary winner, predictable exploitation, or collapse of the diversity that makes the cycle stable."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime is exactly a closed intransitive beats-relation in which A defeats B, B defeats C, and C defeats A.", "role_mapping": "Pairwise comparisons -> beats graph; loop -> directed cycle; nontransitive -> no ranking.", "slug": "rock_paper_scissors", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b019_a09_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Pairwise comparisons produce a loop rather than a transitive order: A beats B, B beats C, and C beats A or analogous multi-node cycles. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Pairwise comparisons produce a loop rather than a transitive order: A beats B, B beats C, and C beats A or analogous multi-node cycles."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Rock-Paper-Scissors (Intransitive Cyclic Dominance)", "one_liner": "A beats-relation that closes into a cycle rather than a ranking, so no option dominates and the system is governed by rotation and coexistence.", "page_ref": "prime:rock_paper_scissors", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Pairwise comparisons -> beats graph; loop -> directed cycle; nontransitive -> no ranking.", "slug": "rock_paper_scissors", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime is exactly a closed intransitive beats-relation in which A defeats B, B defeats C, and C defeats A."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Pairwise comparisons produce a loop rather than a transitive order: A beats B, B beats C, and C beats A or analogous multi-node cycles.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An intransitive beats-relation can be represented explicitly without any score or leaderboard hiding it.", "slug": "rock_paper_scissors"}], "residual_id": "r:cyclic_dominance_counterbalancing:b019_a09_c2", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b019_a09_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A single score, leaderboard, market share, doctrine, tool choice, or policy preference hides the fact that each option is strong against some alternatives and weak against others. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A single score, leaderboard, market share, doctrine, tool choice, or policy preference hides the fact that each option is strong against some alternatives and weak against others."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An intransitive beats-relation can be represented explicitly without any score or leaderboard hiding it.", "slug": "rock_paper_scissors"}], "normalized_requirement": "A single score, leaderboard, market share, doctrine, tool choice, or policy preference hides the fact that each option is strong against some alternatives and weak against others.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A single score, leaderboard, market share, doctrine, tool choice, or policy preference hides the fact that each option is strong against some alternatives and weak against others.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P025-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve decision makers or adaptive actors as the agents performing the repeated response.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Actors are the agents changing strategy.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require recurrent adjustment rather than one isolated switch or response.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The strategic adjustment occurs repeatedly.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires repeated counter-switching as the strategic response.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The actors switch among counters.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires adaptation directed at the option dominant at that time.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The actors adapt to the currently dominant option.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Actors repeatedly switch counters or adapt to the currently dominant option.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Actors repeatedly adjust strategy by counter-switching or adapting to current dominance.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P025-C05-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P025-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve actors or adaptive agents who come to recognize the vulnerability relation.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Actors are the parties making the discovery.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a practice regarded as best or preferred before the vulnerability emerges.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A best practice is the option whose vulnerability is assessed.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve broad adoption rather than isolated or rare use.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The best practice is widely adopted.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail adoption-conditioned vulnerability, not vulnerability unrelated to prevalence.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The best practice becomes vulnerable when it is widely adopted.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Actors discover that a best practice becomes vulnerable when it is widely adopted.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Actors discover that widespread adoption makes a best practice vulnerable.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P025-C05-U2"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The payoff relation can be analyzed statically without actors repeatedly switching or adapting to current dominance.", "slug": "rock_paper_scissors"}], "residual_id": "r:cyclic_dominance_counterbalancing:b019_a09_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b019_a09_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Actors repeatedly switch counters, adapt to the currently dominant option, or discover that a best practice becomes vulnerable when it is widely adopted. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Actors repeatedly switch counters, adapt to the currently dominant option, or discover that a best practice becomes vulnerable when it is widely adopted."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 2, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 2}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The payoff relation can be analyzed statically without actors repeatedly switching or adapting to current dominance.", "slug": "rock_paper_scissors"}], "normalized_requirement": "Actors repeatedly switch counters, adapt to the currently dominant option, or discover that a best practice becomes vulnerable when it is widely adopted.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 2 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Actors repeatedly switch counters, adapt to the currently dominant option, or discover that a best practice becomes vulnerable when it is widely adopted.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P025-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve present weakness of the resilience-supplying option.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "One option is weak at the current time.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a directed counter relation between distinct options.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The weak option counters a different option.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve possible future dominance rather than current dominance or certainty.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The countered option may become dominant later.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve resilience as the future function of retaining or having the weak option.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The currently weak option supplies future resilience.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail the explanatory relation from counter capacity to future resilience.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Countering the potentially dominant option is why the weak option supplies resilience.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "A currently weak option still supplies future resilience because it counters a different option that may later become dominant.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A currently weak option provides future resilience by countering another option that may later dominate.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P025-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime specifies cyclic advantage but not current weakness, future dominance, or a resilience function.", "slug": "rock_paper_scissors"}], "residual_id": "r:cyclic_dominance_counterbalancing:b019_a09_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b019_a09_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Systems need selection pressure to avoid maintaining every option forever, but nontransitive advantage means that eliminating a current loser may remove the future counterweight to the next winner. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A currently weak option still supplies future resilience because it counters a different option that may later become dominant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A currently weak option still supplies future resilience because it counters a different option that may later become dominant.", "Systems need selection pressure to avoid maintaining every option forever, but nontransitive advantage means that eliminating a current loser may remove the future counterweight to the next winner."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime specifies cyclic advantage but not current weakness, future dominance, or a resilience function.", "slug": "rock_paper_scissors"}], "normalized_requirement": "A currently weak option still supplies future resilience because it counters a different option that may later become dominant.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A currently weak option still supplies future resilience because it counters a different option that may later become dominant.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An eliminated option can be restored cheaply and the prime does not require irreversible repertoire loss.", "slug": "rock_paper_scissors"}], "residual_id": "r:cyclic_dominance_counterbalancing:b019_a09_c5", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b019_a09_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Systems need selection pressure to avoid maintaining every option forever, but nontransitive advantage means that eliminating a current loser may remove the future counterweight to the next winner. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The cost of eliminating an option is high because rebuilding it after the cycle turns would be slow, expensive, or impossible.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The cost of eliminating an option is high because rebuilding it after the cycle turns would be slow, expensive, or impossible.", "Systems need selection pressure to avoid maintaining every option forever, but nontransitive advantage means that eliminating a current loser may remove the future counterweight to the next winner."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An eliminated option can be restored cheaply and the prime does not require irreversible repertoire loss.", "slug": "rock_paper_scissors"}], "normalized_requirement": "The cost of eliminating an option is high because rebuilding it after the cycle turns would be slow, expensive, or impossible.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The cost of eliminating an option is high because rebuilding it after the cycle turns would be slow, expensive, or impossible.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The system needs coexistence, rotating advantage, or adaptive repertoire management rather than permanent selection of one winner.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Systems need selection pressure to avoid maintaining every option forever, but nontransitive advantage means that eliminating a current loser may remove the future counterweight to the next winner. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: The system needs coexistence, rotating advantage, or adaptive repertoire management rather than permanent selection of one winner. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The system needs coexistence, rotating advantage, or adaptive repertoire management rather than permanent selection of one winner.", "Systems need selection pressure to avoid maintaining every option forever, but nontransitive advantage means that eliminating a current loser may remove the future counterweight to the next winner."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The system needs coexistence, rotating advantage, or adaptive repertoire management rather than permanent selection of one winner."}, {"display_text": "Stakeholders demand a ranking even though the evidence supports context-dependent pairwise advantage.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Decision makers or adaptive systems treat a nontransitive advantage cycle as though it were a simple ranking, causing premature elimination, overcommitment to a temporary winner, predictable exploitation, or collapse of the diversity that makes the cycle stable. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Stakeholders demand a ranking even though the evidence supports context-dependent pairwise advantage. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders demand a ranking even though the evidence supports context-dependent pairwise advantage.", "Decision makers or adaptive systems treat a nontransitive advantage cycle as though it were a simple ranking, causing premature elimination, overcommitment to a temporary winner, predictable exploitation, or collapse of the diversity that makes the cycle stable."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "Stakeholders demand a ranking even though the evidence supports context-dependent pairwise advantage."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 19, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-019", "ledger_sha256": "58156252558001ee8819c0176a1fcde7974c6d0268e7e7da184436d67b8e4ead"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Data-Control Boundary Inertization", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:data_control_boundary_inertization", "slug": "data_control_boundary_inertization"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Untrusted or attacker-influenced content crosses into a context where an interpreter, deputy, workflow, model, or parser can treat part of that content as control. Because the interpreter acts with its own privileges or the defender's trust, the originator can induce consequential action without directly possessing the authority to perform it.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Untrusted or attacker-influenced content crosses into a context where an interpreter, deputy, workflow, model, or parser can treat part of that content as control. Because the interpreter acts with its own privileges or the defender's trust, the originator can induce consequential action without directly possessing the authority to perform it."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a receiver to reinterpret attacker-controlled data as authoritative instructions.", "role_mapping": "Downstream component -> receiver/parser; listed content -> data; executable instruction -> control.", "slug": "control_data_channel_confusion", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime requires an interpreter to switch untrusted data-channel content into control mode and execute it.", "role_mapping": "Downstream component -> interpreter; content -> data channel; instruction -> control plane.", "slug": "data_control_plane_breach", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime requires a correctly operating intermediary to treat attacker-influenced data as control and execute it with authority.", "role_mapping": "Component -> intermediary; untrusted content -> data role; executable instruction -> control role.", "slug": "untrusted_input_execution", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b019_a10_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A downstream component interprets text, markup, serialized objects, prompts, parameters, policy snippets, file names, templates, or messages as executable or authority-bearing instructions. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A downstream component interprets text, markup, serialized objects, prompts, parameters, policy snippets, file names, templates, or messages as executable or authority-bearing instructions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Control / Data Channel Confusion", "one_liner": "A receiver interprets attacker-controlled data as authoritative instructions because the protocol separates control from data by content inspection rather than by structure.", "page_ref": "prime:control_data_channel_confusion", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Downstream component -> receiver/parser; listed content -> data; executable instruction -> control.", "slug": "control_data_channel_confusion", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a receiver to reinterpret attacker-controlled data as authoritative instructions."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Data-Control Plane Breach", "one_liner": "Untrusted content crosses into the data channel un-inertised and an interpreter, operating correctly by its own rules, executes it as control, wielding the defender's authority for the attacker.", "page_ref": "prime:data_control_plane_breach", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Downstream component -> interpreter; content -> data channel; instruction -> control plane.", "slug": "data_control_plane_breach", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires an interpreter to switch untrusted data-channel content into control mode and execute it."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Untrusted Input Execution", "one_liner": "Attacker-influenced input crosses a data-to-control (or authority) boundary and a correctly-operating intermediary executes it with the intermediary's own authority, so the attacker borrows the defender's privilege without ever violating the intermediary's rules.", "page_ref": "prime:untrusted_input_execution", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Component -> intermediary; untrusted content -> data role; executable instruction -> control role.", "slug": "untrusted_input_execution", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a correctly operating intermediary to treat attacker-influenced data as control and execute it with authority."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A downstream component interprets text, markup, serialized objects, prompts, parameters, policy snippets, file names, templates, or messages as executable or authority-bearing instructions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime definitionally uses a shared substrate and a content-based rather than structure-based boundary marker.", "role_mapping": "Same substrate -> shared carrier; content inspection -> downstream reparsing.", "slug": "control_data_channel_confusion", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime's interpreter changes data into control based on cues within the input, so separation is not structural.", "role_mapping": "Boundary -> data/control crossing; content inspection -> interpreter mode switch.", "slug": "data_control_plane_breach", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b019_a10_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Untrusted or attacker-influenced content crosses into a context where an interpreter, deputy, workflow, model, or parser can treat part of that content as control. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The same substrate carries both data and control, or the boundary between them is enforced only by content inspection.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The same substrate carries both data and control, or the boundary between them is enforced only by content inspection.", "Untrusted or attacker-influenced content crosses into a context where an interpreter, deputy, workflow, model, or parser can treat part of that content as control."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Control / Data Channel Confusion", "one_liner": "A receiver interprets attacker-controlled data as authoritative instructions because the protocol separates control from data by content inspection rather than by structure.", "page_ref": "prime:control_data_channel_confusion", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Same substrate -> shared carrier; content inspection -> downstream reparsing.", "slug": "control_data_channel_confusion", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime definitionally uses a shared substrate and a content-based rather than structure-based boundary marker."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Data-Control Plane Breach", "one_liner": "Untrusted content crosses into the data channel un-inertised and an interpreter, operating correctly by its own rules, executes it as control, wielding the defender's authority for the attacker.", "page_ref": "prime:data_control_plane_breach", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Boundary -> data/control crossing; content inspection -> interpreter mode switch.", "slug": "data_control_plane_breach", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's interpreter changes data into control based on cues within the input, so separation is not structural."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The same substrate carries both data and control, or the boundary between them is enforced only by content inspection.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires attacker-influenced data to enter an un-inertised crossing where an intermediary can execute it as control.", "role_mapping": "Untrusted input -> attacker data; concatenation -> uninertised crossing; expression -> control.", "slug": "untrusted_input_execution", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime requires untrusted content to cross from a data channel into an interpreter as executable control.", "role_mapping": "Listed expression -> control syntax; concatenation -> crossing point.", "slug": "data_control_plane_breach", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b019_a10_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Untrusted or attacker-influenced content crosses into a context where an interpreter, deputy, workflow, model, or parser can treat part of that content as control. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Untrusted input is concatenated into commands, queries, prompts, document formulas, workflow instructions, or policy expressions.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Untrusted input is concatenated into commands, queries, prompts, document formulas, workflow instructions, or policy expressions.", "Untrusted or attacker-influenced content crosses into a context where an interpreter, deputy, workflow, model, or parser can treat part of that content as control."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Untrusted Input Execution", "one_liner": "Attacker-influenced input crosses a data-to-control (or authority) boundary and a correctly-operating intermediary executes it with the intermediary's own authority, so the attacker borrows the defender's privilege without ever violating the intermediary's rules.", "page_ref": "prime:untrusted_input_execution", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Untrusted input -> attacker data; concatenation -> uninertised crossing; expression -> control.", "slug": "untrusted_input_execution", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires attacker-influenced data to enter an un-inertised crossing where an intermediary can execute it as control."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Data-Control Plane Breach", "one_liner": "Untrusted content crosses into the data channel un-inertised and an interpreter, operating correctly by its own rules, executes it as control, wielding the defender's authority for the attacker.", "page_ref": "prime:data_control_plane_breach", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Listed expression -> control syntax; concatenation -> crossing point.", "slug": "data_control_plane_breach", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires untrusted content to cross from a data channel into an interpreter as executable control."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Untrusted input is concatenated into commands, queries, prompts, document formulas, workflow instructions, or policy expressions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's union-not-intersection invariant is exactly execution with the intermediary's own broader authority for an outsider.", "role_mapping": "Trusted intermediary -> correctly operating executor; originator -> attacker; broader authority -> borrowed privilege.", "slug": "untrusted_input_execution", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime requires a privileged intermediary to act on its own authority for an outsider who cannot reach the target directly.", "role_mapping": "Intermediary -> deputy; input originator -> outsider; broader authority -> authority elision.", "slug": "confused_deputy", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b019_a10_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Because the interpreter acts with its own privileges or the defender's trust, the originator can induce consequential action without directly possessing the authority to perform it. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A trusted intermediary executes with broader authority than the input originator possesses.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A trusted intermediary executes with broader authority than the input originator possesses.", "Because the interpreter acts with its own privileges or the defender's trust, the originator can induce consequential action without directly possessing the authority to perform it."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Untrusted Input Execution", "one_liner": "Attacker-influenced input crosses a data-to-control (or authority) boundary and a correctly-operating intermediary executes it with the intermediary's own authority, so the attacker borrows the defender's privilege without ever violating the intermediary's rules.", "page_ref": "prime:untrusted_input_execution", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Trusted intermediary -> correctly operating executor; originator -> attacker; broader authority -> borrowed privilege.", "slug": "untrusted_input_execution", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's union-not-intersection invariant is exactly execution with the intermediary's own broader authority for an outsider."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Confused Deputy", "one_liner": "A privileged intermediary acts on its own authority while the intent originated with an outsider who lacks it, so authority is borrowed without intent being tracked.", "page_ref": "prime:confused_deputy", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Intermediary -> deputy; input originator -> outsider; broader authority -> authority elision.", "slug": "confused_deputy", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a privileged intermediary to act on its own authority for an outsider who cannot reach the target directly."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A trusted intermediary executes with broader authority than the input originator possesses.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P025-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve input or content as the object undergoing transformation.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Input is the object passing through transformations.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a transformation path or pipeline rather than an unchanged boundary crossing.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The input passes through one or more transformations.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve possibility and need not require that the effect has already occurred.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The transformations are capable of producing the listed effect.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires loss or erasure of trust labeling during transformation.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The transformations can erase trust labels.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires transformation-induced context change.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The transformations can change the input’s context.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires executable interpretation to be restored or introduced by transformation.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The transformations can reintroduce executable meaning.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Input passes through transformations that can erase trust labels, change context, or reintroduce executable meaning.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Input transformations can produce a listed trust-, context-, or executability-changing effect.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P025-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Boundary-state loss can omit any rich contextual state and does not specifically require trust labels, executable meaning, or a transformation chain that reintroduces control.", "slug": "boundary_state_loss"}], "residual_id": "r:data_control_boundary_inertization:b019_a10_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b019_a10_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Input passes through transformations that can erase trust labels, change context, or reintroduce executable meaning. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Input passes through transformations that can erase trust labels, change context, or reintroduce executable meaning."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "An attempted injection instance in which no input transformation introduces executable meaning falls outside the exact definition, which requires data to cross into a control channel and be executed by an interpreter.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Injection Weakness", "one_liner": "The software-security failure in which untrusted data crosses into a control channel and a downstream interpreter executes it as command, query, or instruction — a collapse of the data/control boundary that a legitimate, often credential-free, input channel is enough to exploit.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:injection_weakness", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "injection_weakness"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "injection_weakness", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P025-C07-U1", "why_it_fits": "Retained under universal necessity: the exact record necessarily satisfies complete DNF branch O1+O2+O3+O6 under the subtype-preserving role mapping."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A prompt-security event with no data-to-instruction reinterpretation is not prompt injection; the exact record requires the embedded directive to execute at the model's granted privilege.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Prompt Injection", "one_liner": "Untrusted content delivered to a language model through a data channel is interpreted as instructions rather than material to process, so an embedded directive executes at the model's privilege — the failure being the absence of any in-band boundary between instructions and data, not a lapse in alignment.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:prompt_injection", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "prompt_injection"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "prompt_injection", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P025-C07-U1", "why_it_fits": "Retained under universal necessity: the exact record necessarily satisfies complete DNF branch O1+O2+O3+O6 under the subtype-preserving role mapping."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "If inserted bytes remain inert after browser parsing, the instance is not cross-site scripting. Every exact-record XSS instance therefore preserves the transformation-induced executable interpretation.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Cross-Site Scripting", "one_liner": "Insert attacker-supplied bytes into a server's output so the victim's browser executes them under the trusted site's origin, arising when content is written into a sink without encoding for the context it lands in.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:cross_site_scripting", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "cross_site_scripting"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "cross_site_scripting", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P025-C07-U1", "why_it_fits": "Retained under universal necessity: the exact record necessarily satisfies complete DNF branch O1+O2+O3+O6 under the subtype-preserving role mapping."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A minimum-capability parser that yields inert validated data does not instantiate insecure deserialization; the exact weakness requires representation-to-executable-state promotion during parsing.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Insecure Deserialization", "one_liner": "Recognize the weakness where a runtime reconstitutes an untrusted serialised byte stream into behaviour-bearing objects because the parser's own semantics execute code during the parse — safe only if the parser's power sits strictly below the runtime it feeds.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:insecure_deserialization", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "insecure_deserialization"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "insecure_deserialization", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P025-C07-U1", "why_it_fits": "Retained under universal necessity: the exact record necessarily satisfies complete DNF branch O1+O2+O3+O6 under the subtype-preserving role mapping."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A production-only deepfake need not change an existing artifact's context, so the unguarded DSA is too broad; restricting to its named context-manipulation axis removes that counterexample.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Manipulated Media", "one_liner": "A representational artifact whose link to the source event it purports to depict has been silently broken — through deceptive production, attribution, or context — while it retains the surface markers audiences use to infer authenticity.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:manipulated_media", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O5"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "manipulation_axis_context", "predicate": "The manipulated-media instance lies on the explicitly named context-manipulation axis.", "rationale": "The exact expression necessarily satisfies branch O1+O2+O3+O5; the attempted counterexample violates the exact definition or the explicit guarded restriction."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "manipulated_media"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "manipulation_axis_context"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "manipulated_media", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P025-C07-U1", "why_it_fits": "Retained under universal necessity: the exact record plus the single atomic qualifier necessarily satisfies complete DNF branch O1+O2+O3+O5 under the subtype-preserving role mapping."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A layout transformation that preserved all encoded relations would falsify the source effect, but it would not be responsive-layout breakage under the exact record.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Responsive-Layout Breakage", "one_liner": "Diagnose the silent UI failure where an interface's content survives a viewport, device, or locale transformation but its layout-encoded meaning — priority, adjacency, hierarchy, above-the-fold prominence — is lost, so a passing content-accessibility check actively conceals the defect.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:responsive_layout_breakage", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "responsive_layout_breakage"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "responsive_layout_breakage", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P025-C07-U1", "why_it_fits": "Retained under universal necessity: the exact record necessarily satisfies complete DNF branch O1+O2+O3+O5 under the subtype-preserving role mapping."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A binder that preserves the input's untrusted context by enforcing a field allow-list falls outside mass assignment; the exact weakness necessarily changes the input's trust context.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Mass Assignment", "one_liner": "The web-application vulnerability in which a request-binding layer writes all client-supplied fields directly to a domain object with no allow-list, letting a caller set server-managed attributes like role or owner_id simply by naming them.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:mass_assignment", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "mass_assignment"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "mass_assignment", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P025-C07-U1", "why_it_fits": "Retained under universal necessity: the exact record necessarily satisfies complete DNF branch O1+O2+O3+O5 under the subtype-preserving role mapping."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Input passes through transformations that can erase trust labels, change context, or reintroduce executable meaning.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Content-based parsing is nonstructural but need not use a blacklist, informal convention, or post-hoc audit.", "slug": "control_data_channel_confusion"}], "residual_id": "r:data_control_boundary_inertization:b019_a10_c6", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b019_a10_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The system relies on blacklist filtering, informal conventions, or post-hoc audit instead of structural separation. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The system relies on blacklist filtering, informal conventions, or post-hoc audit instead of structural separation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Content-based parsing is nonstructural but need not use a blacklist, informal convention, or post-hoc audit.", "slug": "control_data_channel_confusion"}], "normalized_requirement": "The system relies on blacklist filtering, informal conventions, or post-hoc audit instead of structural separation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The system relies on blacklist filtering, informal conventions, or post-hoc audit instead of structural separation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 19, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-019", "ledger_sha256": "58156252558001ee8819c0176a1fcde7974c6d0268e7e7da184436d67b8e4ead"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Data Integrity Preservation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:data_integrity_preservation", "slug": "data_integrity_preservation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 2, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is that data must remain stable enough to guide action while also moving through imperfect people, systems, formats, permissions, transformations, and time. A record that was once accurate can become stale. A field that is valid in isolation can contradict another system. A file can be unchanged but wrong at source. A log can exist while the real change path went around it.\n\nThis produces a trust gap: the system has data, but it cannot confidently say what the data means, where it came from, whether it is current, who changed it, or how to repair it when it disagrees with another representation.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Data or records that support decisions can lose accuracy, consistency, provenance, authority, or recoverability as they are created, transformed, copied, integrated, edited, migrated, archived, or restored."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P025-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O10"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O11"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O12"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O13"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5", "O10"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5", "O11"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5", "O12"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5", "O13"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6", "O10"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6", "O11"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6", "O12"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6", "O13"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7", "O10"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7", "O11"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7", "O12"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7", "O13"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O8", "O10"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O8", "O11"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O8", "O12"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O8", "O13"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O9", "O10"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O9", "O11"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O9", "O12"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O9", "O13"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve data or records as the input on which the operational use depends.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Data is the informational dependency.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail operational dependence on the data rather than mere co-occurrence or reference.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A listed operational use depends on the data.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the source’s may-modality and need not require that corruption has already occurred.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The data defect is possible rather than necessarily actual.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This use-group branch requires a decision to depend on the data.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A decision is the data-dependent operational use.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This use-group branch requires an obligation to depend on the data.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "An obligation is the data-dependent operational use.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This use-group branch requires a calculation to depend on the data.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "A calculation is the data-dependent operational use.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This use-group branch requires an eligibility rule to depend on the data.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "An eligibility rule is the data-dependent operational use.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This use-group branch requires a safety action to depend on the data.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "A safety action is the data-dependent operational use.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This use-group branch requires a report to depend on the data.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "A report is the data-dependent operational use.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This defect-group branch requires that the data may be wrong.", "obligation_id": "O10", "statement": "Wrongness is the possible data defect.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This defect-group branch requires that the data may be stale.", "obligation_id": "O11", "statement": "Staleness is the possible data defect.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This defect-group branch requires that the data may be incomplete.", "obligation_id": "O12", "statement": "Incompleteness is the possible data defect.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This defect-group branch requires that the data may be inconsistent.", "obligation_id": "O13", "statement": "Inconsistency is the possible data defect.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "A decision, obligation, calculation, eligibility rule, safety action, or report depends on data that may be wrong, stale, incomplete, or inconsistent.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A listed operational use depends on data that may have a listed integrity defect.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P025-C08-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Past-state contamination requires obsolete state to influence a current process but does not cover wrong, incomplete, or inconsistent data generally or any listed decision use.", "slug": "past_state_contamination"}], "residual_id": "r:data_integrity_preservation:b019_a11_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b019_a11_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when decisions depend on records that can be corrupted, duplicated, desynchronized, altered without authority, detached from provenance, or restored from an uncertain state. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A decision, obligation, calculation, eligibility rule, safety action, or report depends on data that may be wrong, stale, incomplete, or inconsistent.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A decision, obligation, calculation, eligibility rule, safety action, or report depends on data that may be wrong, stale, incomplete, or inconsistent.", "Use this archetype when decisions depend on records that can be corrupted, duplicated, desynchronized, altered without authority, detached from provenance, or restored from an uncertain state."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Complete observation of every unit's alternative potential outcomes would falsify the incomplete-data branch, but the exact record identifies that impossibility as the fundamental inferential gap.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Causal Inference", "one_liner": "Infer the effect of changing X on Y from data by fixing a causal estimand and defending an identification design or assumption that separates that effect from noncausal association, then quantify its uncertainty and scope.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:causal_inference", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "causal_inference"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "causal_inference", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P025-C08-U1", "why_it_fits": "Retained under universal necessity: the exact record necessarily satisfies complete DNF branch O1+O2+O3+O6+O12 under the subtype-preserving role mapping."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A complete case set with no filtering loss is not outbreak underascertainment; the exact concept requires incomplete recorded data that feeds surveillance reporting and calibration.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Outbreak Underascertainment", "one_liner": "The surveillance failure in which recorded case counts fall systematically below the true count because a multi-stage detection pipeline — symptom expression, care-seeking, testing, confirmation, reporting — filters cases with biased attenuation at each layer.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:outbreak_underascertainment", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "outbreak_underascertainment"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "outbreak_underascertainment", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P025-C08-U1", "why_it_fits": "Retained under universal necessity: the exact record necessarily satisfies complete DNF branch O1+O2+O3+O6+O12 under the subtype-preserving role mapping."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "If scoring does not depend on the mutable labels or the labels remain anchored to the construct, the defining erosion and its stable-but-invalid metric cannot occur.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Gold-Standard Erosion", "one_liner": "Recognize that a model scored against a mutable reference label can show stable metrics while its real validity silently degrades, because the answer key — not the model — has drifted away from the construct it once operationalized.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:gold_standard_erosion", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "gold_standard_erosion"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "gold_standard_erosion", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P025-C08-U1", "why_it_fits": "Retained under universal necessity: the exact record necessarily satisfies complete DNF branch O1+O2+O3+O6+O10 under the subtype-preserving role mapping."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A metric independent of the labels, or a stable label definition, would not instantiate ground-truth drift as frozen in the exact record.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Ground-Truth Drift", "one_liner": "The model-evaluation failure in which the operational definition of the correct answer drifts on a clock the monitoring apparatus cannot see, so metrics keep scoring against a moved target while the dashboards stay green — invisible because every detector consumes current ground truth as its reference.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:ground_truth_drift", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "ground_truth_drift"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "ground_truth_drift", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P025-C08-U1", "why_it_fits": "Retained under universal necessity: the exact record necessarily satisfies complete DNF branch O1+O2+O3+O6+O11 under the subtype-preserving role mapping."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Without the guard, a speaker can cherry-pick evidence in an oral debate with no operational report. The guard excludes only that domain counterexample while leaving the candidate's data, dependence, and incompleteness intact.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Cherry Picking", "one_liner": "Selectively presenting confirming evidence while suppressing disconfirming evidence from the same available population, so the offered sample gives an impression the full distribution would not support — locating the dishonesty in the selection process, not the individual data points.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:cherry_picking", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O9"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "selective_evidence_presentation_is_operational_report", "predicate": "The candidate's selective evidence presentation is an operational report.", "rationale": "The exact expression necessarily satisfies branch O1+O2+O3+O9+O12; the attempted counterexample violates the exact definition or the explicit guarded restriction."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "cherry_picking"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "selective_evidence_presentation_is_operational_report"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "cherry_picking", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P025-C08-U1", "why_it_fits": "Retained under universal necessity: the exact record plus the single atomic qualifier necessarily satisfies complete DNF branch O1+O2+O3+O9+O12 under the subtype-preserving role mapping."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "If the reports do not depend on case-classified data or the case definition stays commensurable, the exact drift failure is absent.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Case-Definition Drift", "one_liner": "The surveillance failure in which the operational definition of 'a case' silently changes across time, place, or data source while counts are still reported and compared under a stable label — conflating real epidemiological change with an artefact of what the instrument now counts.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:case_definition_drift", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "case_definition_drift"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "case_definition_drift", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P025-C08-U1", "why_it_fits": "Retained under universal necessity: the exact record necessarily satisfies complete DNF branch O1+O2+O3+O9+O13 under the subtype-preserving role mapping."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A decision, obligation, calculation, eligibility rule, safety action, or report depends on data that may be wrong, stale, incomplete, or inconsistent.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires an artifact to have distinguishable incremental versions across time.", "role_mapping": "Same record -> versioned artifact; multiple versions -> tracked change states.", "slug": "versioning", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b019_a11_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It fits databases, ledgers, case files, research datasets, safety logs, supply-chain records, documentation systems, and any workflow where downstream users need to know whether the data can be relied on. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The same entity, event, transaction, account, or record appears in multiple systems or versions.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The same entity, event, transaction, account, or record appears in multiple systems or versions.", "It fits databases, ledgers, case files, research datasets, safety logs, supply-chain records, documentation systems, and any workflow where downstream users need to know whether the data can be relied on."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Versioning", "one_liner": "Tracks incremental changes over time.", "page_ref": "prime:versioning", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Same record -> versioned artifact; multiple versions -> tracked change states.", "slug": "versioning", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires an artifact to have distinguishable incremental versions across time."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The same entity, event, transaction, account, or record appears in multiple systems or versions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires an origin followed by documented custody transfers linking the current state through successive boundaries.", "role_mapping": "Data -> tracked entity; boundary -> custody handoff; source-to-derivation -> provenance chain.", "slug": "provenance", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b019_a11_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It fits databases, ledgers, case files, research datasets, safety logs, supply-chain records, documentation systems, and any workflow where downstream users need to know whether the data can be relied on. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Data crosses a boundary: manual-to-automated, upstream-to-downstream, old-system-to-new-system, source-to-derivation, or internal-to-external.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Data crosses a boundary: manual-to-automated, upstream-to-downstream, old-system-to-new-system, source-to-derivation, or internal-to-external.", "It fits databases, ledgers, case files, research datasets, safety logs, supply-chain records, documentation systems, and any workflow where downstream users need to know whether the data can be relied on."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Provenance", "one_liner": "A documented, traceable record of an entity's origin and successive custody transfers that establishes authenticity and assigns accountability by linking present state back to first known state.", "page_ref": "prime:provenance", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Data -> tracked entity; boundary -> custody handoff; source-to-derivation -> provenance chain.", "slug": "provenance", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires an origin followed by documented custody transfers linking the current state through successive boundaries."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Data crosses a boundary: manual-to-automated, upstream-to-downstream, old-system-to-new-system, source-to-derivation, or internal-to-external.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P025-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve state treated as trusted before the possible change.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Trusted state is the object exposed to alteration.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve possibility rather than require an already completed alteration.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The deficiently controlled change could alter the trusted state.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve lack of visible detection or signaling during the alteration.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The possible alteration can occur silently.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires absence of authorization for the change.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The change is unauthorized.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires inadequate change control even if authorization status is not specified.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The change is poorly controlled.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Unauthorized or poorly controlled changes could silently alter trusted state.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A change lacking authorization or adequate control could silently alter trusted state.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P025-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime includes detection, trust-anchor, verification, and recovery controls and therefore does not require trusted state to remain silently alterable.", "slug": "data_integrity"}], "residual_id": "r:data_integrity_preservation:b019_a11_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b019_a11_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when decisions depend on records that can be corrupted, duplicated, desynchronized, altered without authority, detached from provenance, or restored from an uncertain state. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Unauthorized or poorly controlled changes could silently alter trusted state.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Unauthorized or poorly controlled changes could silently alter trusted state.", "Use this archetype when decisions depend on records that can be corrupted, duplicated, desynchronized, altered without authority, detached from provenance, or restored from an uncertain state."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A visible, adequately controlled change whose enacted effect remains aligned with the documented control does not instantiate hazard-control decay; the defining gap requires blind, inadequately controlled alteration.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Hazard-Control Decay", "one_liner": "Track the widening gap between what a safety control's paperwork says it does and what it actually does under hazard, so that a control certified sound by audit can be found silently unprotective before it fails.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:hazard_control_decay", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "hazard_control_decay"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "hazard_control_decay", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P025-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "Retained under universal necessity: the exact record necessarily satisfies complete DNF branch O1+O2+O3+O5 under the subtype-preserving role mapping."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A field write constrained by an authorization-aware allow-list is not mass assignment; the exact weakness necessarily permits silent unauthorized alteration of trusted attributes.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Mass Assignment", "one_liner": "The web-application vulnerability in which a request-binding layer writes all client-supplied fields directly to a domain object with no allow-list, letting a caller set server-managed attributes like role or owner_id simply by naming them.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:mass_assignment", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "mass_assignment"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "mass_assignment", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P025-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "Retained under universal necessity: the exact record necessarily satisfies complete DNF branch O1+O2+O3+O4 under the subtype-preserving role mapping."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A fully versioned reference change propagated into every dependent scorer is not gold-standard erosion; the exact failure requires silent untracked divergence from the construct.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Gold-Standard Erosion", "one_liner": "Recognize that a model scored against a mutable reference label can show stable metrics while its real validity silently degrades, because the answer key — not the model — has drifted away from the construct it once operationalized.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:gold_standard_erosion", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "gold_standard_erosion"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "gold_standard_erosion", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P025-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "Retained under universal necessity: the exact record necessarily satisfies complete DNF branch O1+O2+O3+O5 under the subtype-preserving role mapping."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A versioned definition change detected through like-for-like rescoring does not preserve the exact record's monitoring-invisible drift.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Ground-Truth Drift", "one_liner": "The model-evaluation failure in which the operational definition of the correct answer drifts on a clock the monitoring apparatus cannot see, so metrics keep scoring against a moved target while the dashboards stay green — invisible because every detector consumes current ground truth as its reference.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:ground_truth_drift", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "ground_truth_drift"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "ground_truth_drift", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P025-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "Retained under universal necessity: the exact record necessarily satisfies complete DNF branch O1+O2+O3+O5 under the subtype-preserving role mapping."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Unauthorized or poorly controlled changes could silently alter trusted state.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime is a documented origin and custody chain used to establish authenticity and accountability for the present record.", "role_mapping": "Origin/change evidence -> provenance chain; downstream reliance -> claim verification.", "slug": "provenance", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b019_a11_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It fits databases, ledgers, case files, research datasets, safety logs, supply-chain records, documentation systems, and any workflow where downstream users need to know whether the data can be relied on. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Downstream users need evidence of origin, change history, review, or recovery before relying on records.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Downstream users need evidence of origin, change history, review, or recovery before relying on records.", "It fits databases, ledgers, case files, research datasets, safety logs, supply-chain records, documentation systems, and any workflow where downstream users need to know whether the data can be relied on."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Provenance", "one_liner": "A documented, traceable record of an entity's origin and successive custody transfers that establishes authenticity and assigns accountability by linking present state back to first known state.", "page_ref": "prime:provenance", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Origin/change evidence -> provenance chain; downstream reliance -> claim verification.", "slug": "provenance", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime is a documented origin and custody chain used to establish authenticity and accountability for the present record."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Downstream users need evidence of origin, change history, review, or recovery before relying on records.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Integrity failure would be costly, unsafe, unfair, legally consequential, or difficult to detect after the fact.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Integrity failure would be costly, unsafe, unfair, legally consequential, or difficult to detect after the fact. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Integrity failure would be costly, unsafe, unfair, legally consequential, or difficult to detect after the fact."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Integrity failure would be costly, unsafe, unfair, legally consequential, or difficult to detect after the fact."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 19, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-019", "ledger_sha256": "58156252558001ee8819c0176a1fcde7974c6d0268e7e7da184436d67b8e4ead"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Deadlock Prevention", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:deadlock_prevention", "slug": "deadlock_prevention"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 6, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 2, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "6 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a reachable circular wait. There are at least two participants, and often many more. Each participant can hold a resource or commitment that someone else needs. Each can wait for another resource or commitment before releasing what they already hold. If no rule forces release, consistent ordering, safe admission, or preemption, the system can freeze even though every necessary resource still exists somewhere in the system.\n\nThis differs from ordinary scarcity. In a queue, people may wait because a resource is scarce, but the line can still move. In a deadlock risk, the waiting structure can become self-sustaining: A waits for B, B waits for C, and C waits for A. No participant can finish without another moving first.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system contains multiple actors or processes that need shared resources, permissions, commitments, or sequencing positions. Each can acquire and hold part of what it needs while waiting for something held by another actor. Under the wrong interleaving, the system can enter a circular wait in which no participant can proceed and none is structurally forced to release what others need."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires each participant in a circular hold-and-wait cycle to hold one claim while seeking another.", "role_mapping": "Actor/process -> blocked participant; multiple claims -> held plus awaited resource.", "slug": "deadlock", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b019_a12_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system contains multiple actors or processes that need shared resources, permissions, commitments, or sequencing positions. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Actors or processes acquire more than one resource, permission, lock, commitment, or approval.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Actors or processes acquire more than one resource, permission, lock, commitment, or approval.", "A system contains multiple actors or processes that need shared resources, permissions, commitments, or sequencing positions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Deadlock", "one_liner": "Mutual blocking processes.", "page_ref": "prime:deadlock", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Actor/process -> blocked participant; multiple claims -> held plus awaited resource.", "slug": "deadlock", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires each participant in a circular hold-and-wait cycle to hold one claim while seeking another."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Actors or processes acquire more than one resource, permission, lock, commitment, or approval.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Mutual exclusion is a necessary Coffman condition: each resource in the blocking cycle is held exclusively.", "role_mapping": "Resource -> held claim; non-shareable -> mutual exclusion.", "slug": "deadlock", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b019_a12_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "In a queue, people may wait because a resource is scarce, but the line can still move. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Resources are scarce, exclusive, or effectively non-shareable during use.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Resources are scarce, exclusive, or effectively non-shareable during use.", "In a queue, people may wait because a resource is scarce, but the line can still move."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Deadlock", "one_liner": "Mutual blocking processes.", "page_ref": "prime:deadlock", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Resource -> held claim; non-shareable -> mutual exclusion.", "slug": "deadlock", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Mutual exclusion is a necessary Coffman condition: each resource in the blocking cycle is held exclusively."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Resources are scarce, exclusive, or effectively non-shareable during use.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A circular wait requires participants' hold-then-request relations to close into incompatible acquisition order around a cycle.", "role_mapping": "Participants -> processes; different orders -> circular hold-and-wait.", "slug": "deadlock", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b019_a12_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Each participant can hold a resource or commitment that someone else needs. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Different participants acquire resources in different orders.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Different participants acquire resources in different orders.", "Each participant can hold a resource or commitment that someone else needs."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Deadlock", "one_liner": "Mutual blocking processes.", "page_ref": "prime:deadlock", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Participants -> processes; different orders -> circular hold-and-wait.", "slug": "deadlock", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A circular wait requires participants' hold-then-request relations to close into incompatible acquisition order around a cycle."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Different participants acquire resources in different orders.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "No-preemption is necessary for deadlock: a held claim cannot be forcibly recovered to break the circular wait.", "role_mapping": "Release/preemption -> resource recovery; absent or unsafe -> no-preemption.", "slug": "deadlock", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b019_a12_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "If no rule forces release, consistent ordering, safe admission, or preemption, the system can freeze even though every necessary resource still exists somewhere in the system. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Release, rollback, timeout, or preemption is absent, unsafe, or socially costly.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Release, rollback, timeout, or preemption is absent, unsafe, or socially costly.", "If no rule forces release, consistent ordering, safe admission, or preemption, the system can freeze even though every necessary resource still exists somewhere in the system."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Deadlock", "one_liner": "Mutual blocking processes.", "page_ref": "prime:deadlock", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Release/preemption -> resource recovery; absent or unsafe -> no-preemption.", "slug": "deadlock", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "No-preemption is necessary for deadlock: a held claim cannot be forcibly recovered to break the circular wait."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Release, rollback, timeout, or preemption is absent, unsafe, or socially costly.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P025-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve at least two parties whose progress or commitments can constrain one another.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Multiple participants take part in the coordination process.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve reciprocal blocking, withholding, or leverage rather than unilateral delay.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The participants can hold one another hostage.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must make hostage-taking structurally possible without requiring it to be occurring already.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The process allows mutual hostage-taking.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires the mutual hostage-taking capability to arise within negotiation.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Negotiation is the enabling process.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires the capability to arise within an approval process.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Approval is the enabling process.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires the capability to arise within governance.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "A governance step is the enabling process.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Negotiations, approvals, or governance steps allow mutual hostage-taking.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A listed coordination process allows participants to hold one another hostage.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P025-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Deadlock can occur among software processes with no negotiation, governance, or hostage-taking.", "slug": "deadlock"}], "residual_id": "r:deadlock_prevention:b019_a12_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b019_a12_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The pattern is especially useful before high-contention operations, concurrent software execution, multi-resource scheduling, approval workflows, infrastructure deployments, and negotiations where parties can hold dependent commitments hostage. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Negotiations, approvals, or governance steps allow mutual hostage-taking.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Negotiations, approvals, or governance steps allow mutual hostage-taking.", "The pattern is especially useful before high-contention operations, concurrent software execution, multi-resource scheduling, approval workflows, infrastructure deployments, and negotiations where parties can hold dependent commitments hostage."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "If one party can be bypassed or consent is not required, the exact holdout mechanism disappears. Every complete instance therefore preserves reciprocal hostage capability within negotiation.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Holdout Problem", "one_liner": "The bargaining failure in which a complementary surplus requiring unanimous consent lets any pivotal, non-substitutable party refuse agreement and extract a disproportionate share as the price of consent — making rational extraction, not bad faith, the equilibrium.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:holdout_problem", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "holdout_problem"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "holdout_problem", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P025-C10-U1", "why_it_fits": "Retained under universal necessity: the exact record necessarily satisfies complete DNF branch O1+O2+O3+O4 under the subtype-preserving role mapping."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Negotiations, approvals, or governance steps allow mutual hostage-taking.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P025-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve ordinary waiting before the activating condition changes the state.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Normal waiting is the baseline process state.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve reciprocal or circular inability to proceed, not increased waiting alone.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Circular blocking is the resulting state.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail a directed transition caused or activated by the condition.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The listed condition changes normal waiting into circular blocking.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires high contention to activate the transition.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A high-contention period is the activating condition.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires an uncommon sequencing interleaving to activate the transition.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "A rare interleaving is the activating condition.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires crisis conditions to activate the transition.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "A crisis condition is the activating condition.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "High-contention periods, rare interleavings, or crisis conditions change normal waiting into circular blocking.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A listed exceptional condition changes normal waiting into circular blocking.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P025-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A circular wait can arise deterministically under ordinary load and need not be activated by rare contention, interleaving, or crisis.", "slug": "deadlock"}], "residual_id": "r:deadlock_prevention:b019_a12_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b019_a12_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The structural problem is a reachable circular wait. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: High-contention periods, rare interleavings, or crisis conditions change normal waiting into circular blocking.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["High-contention periods, rare interleavings, or crisis conditions change normal waiting into circular blocking.", "The structural problem is a reachable circular wait."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Heap-layout and clock-state mandelbugs need not block at all; the named lock-ordering-deadlock subtype restriction excludes them without inventing a new manifestation.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Mandelbug", "one_liner": "Reclassify a chaotic, irreproducible software defect as deterministic-but-undersampled — triggered by a rare joint configuration of hidden state — so effort shifts from finding the right breakpoint to sampling that joint state until the configuration is caught.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:mandelbug", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "mandelbug_lock_ordering_deadlock", "predicate": "The mandelbug is the explicitly named lock-ordering-deadlock manifestation triggered by a rare scheduling interleaving.", "rationale": "The exact expression necessarily satisfies branch O1+O2+O3+O5; the attempted counterexample violates the exact definition or the explicit guarded restriction."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "mandelbug"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "mandelbug_lock_ordering_deadlock"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "mandelbug", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P025-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "Retained under universal necessity: the exact record plus the single atomic qualifier necessarily satisfies complete DNF branch O1+O2+O3+O5 under the subtype-preserving role mapping."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "High-contention periods, rare interleavings, or crisis conditions change normal waiting into circular blocking.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 19, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-019", "ledger_sha256": "58156252558001ee8819c0176a1fcde7974c6d0268e7e7da184436d67b8e4ead"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Deadlock Resolution", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:deadlock_resolution", "slug": "deadlock_resolution"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a closed wait-for loop. Participant A cannot proceed until B releases or decides something; B cannot proceed until C does; C cannot proceed until A does. The held condition may be a technical lock, a reserved machine, a budget approval, a legal concession, a file, a scheduling slot, a promised decision, or social willingness to move first.\n\nThis kind of blockage is stubborn because each participant’s local behavior can be rational. Holding a lock protects data integrity. Holding a concession protects bargaining position. Holding an approval protects accountability. Yet when all participants protect locally at once, the whole system loses liveness.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Actors, processes, negotiations, or resources are already configured in a circular wait. Each participant may be locally reasonable in holding what it has while waiting for something else, but the combined state prevents all participants from advancing. The system is not merely slow or under-resourced; it is structurally stuck."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime is exactly a present cycle of mutually blocking hold-and-wait relations.", "role_mapping": "Circular wait -> deadlock cycle; present -> realized blocked state.", "slug": "deadlock", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b019_a13_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The common signature is that progress resumes only after one link in the circular hold-and-wait structure changes. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A circular wait or mutual hold-and-wait state is present rather than merely possible.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A circular wait or mutual hold-and-wait state is present rather than merely possible.", "The common signature is that progress resumes only after one link in the circular hold-and-wait structure changes."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Deadlock", "one_liner": "Mutual blocking processes.", "page_ref": "prime:deadlock", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Circular wait -> deadlock cycle; present -> realized blocked state.", "slug": "deadlock", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime is exactly a present cycle of mutually blocking hold-and-wait relations."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A circular wait or mutual hold-and-wait state is present rather than merely possible.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Each process in a deadlock holds an exclusive resource while waiting and cannot unilaterally release or be preempted without abandoning its pending operation.", "role_mapping": "Participant -> blocked process; current claim -> held resource; not release -> hold-and-wait/no-preemption.", "slug": "deadlock", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b019_a13_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Participant A cannot proceed until B releases or decides something; B cannot proceed until C does; C cannot proceed until A does. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Each participant has a reason not to release its current claim first.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Each participant has a reason not to release its current claim first.", "Participant A cannot proceed until B releases or decides something; B cannot proceed until C does; C cannot proceed until A does."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Deadlock", "one_liner": "Mutual blocking processes.", "page_ref": "prime:deadlock", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Participant -> blocked process; current claim -> held resource; not release -> hold-and-wait/no-preemption.", "slug": "deadlock", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Each process in a deadlock holds an exclusive resource while waiting and cannot unilaterally release or be preempted without abandoning its pending operation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Each participant has a reason not to release its current claim first.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Mutual exclusion requires the held item in the circular wait to be non-shareable.", "role_mapping": "Blocked item -> resource; exclusive/not shareable -> mutual exclusion.", "slug": "deadlock", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b019_a13_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The blocked item is exclusive, scarce, sequenced, authoritative, or otherwise not freely shareable. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The blocked item is exclusive, scarce, sequenced, authoritative, or otherwise not freely shareable."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Deadlock", "one_liner": "Mutual blocking processes.", "page_ref": "prime:deadlock", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Blocked item -> resource; exclusive/not shareable -> mutual exclusion.", "slug": "deadlock", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Mutual exclusion requires the held item in the circular wait to be non-shareable."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The blocked item is exclusive, scarce, sequenced, authoritative, or otherwise not freely shareable.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A deadlocked cycle has no internal progress path through continued waiting because every participant waits on another in the cycle.", "role_mapping": "Routine waiting -> blocked persistence; no resolution -> circular wait invariant.", "slug": "deadlock", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b019_a13_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Routine waiting no longer has a credible path to resolution. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Routine waiting no longer has a credible path to resolution."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Deadlock", "one_liner": "Mutual blocking processes.", "page_ref": "prime:deadlock", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Routine waiting -> blocked persistence; no resolution -> circular wait invariant.", "slug": "deadlock", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A deadlocked cycle has no internal progress path through continued waiting because every participant waits on another in the cycle."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Routine waiting no longer has a credible path to resolution.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Intervention stacks can accrete without breaking a deadlock, and deadlock preemption can be side-effect free.", "slug": "intervention_stack_accretion"}], "residual_id": "r:deadlock_resolution:b019_a13_c5", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b019_a13_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Resolution must break the cycle without turning necessary release into arbitrary punishment or unrecoverable loss. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Breaking the cycle has side effects that must be managed.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Breaking the cycle has side effects that must be managed.", "Resolution must break the cycle without turning necessary release into arbitrary punishment or unrecoverable loss."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Intervention stacks can accrete without breaking a deadlock, and deadlock preemption can be side-effect free.", "slug": "intervention_stack_accretion"}], "normalized_requirement": "Breaking the cycle has side effects that must be managed.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Breaking the cycle has side effects that must be managed.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "An external resolver or higher-order rule can alter the blocked state.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: An external resolver or higher-order rule can alter the blocked state. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["An external resolver or higher-order rule can alter the blocked state."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "An external resolver or higher-order rule can alter the blocked state."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 19, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-019", "ledger_sha256": "58156252558001ee8819c0176a1fcde7974c6d0268e7e7da184436d67b8e4ead"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Deadweight Loss Reduction", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:deadweight_loss_reduction", "slug": "deadweight_loss_reduction"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a wedge between potential value and realized behavior. Actors may be willing to exchange, coordinate, use capacity, or allocate resources more productively, but a rule, price, barrier, or process makes that action irrational, illegal, slow, risky, or impossible. The result is foregone surplus: value that could have existed but does not.\n\nThe wedge can take many forms. It may be a price floor or ceiling that creates shortage or surplus. It may be a permit path whose delay is larger than its protective function requires. It may be an allocation rule that leaves capacity idle while unmet demand waits. It may be a fee that discourages beneficial compliance. It may be a matching rule that blocks mutually beneficial pairs. The common structure is not the domain instrument; it is the avoidable destruction of value through a rule-mediated or friction-mediated gap.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A rule, price, friction, or allocation constraint prevents otherwise beneficial exchange, use, coordination, or resource movement by creating a wedge between private action and achievable value. The wedge causes foregone surplus, idle capacity, shortage, surplus, delay, mismatch, or low-value substitution that is not fully justified by the constraint’s protective purpose."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a distortive wedge to block mutually beneficial market activity and destroy total surplus.", "role_mapping": "Policy/price barrier -> wedge; blocked mutual value -> lost gains from trade.", "slug": "deadweight_loss", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b019_a14_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when a rule, price, approval path, threshold, matching process, or allocation constraint blocks otherwise beneficial exchange, use, coordination, or capacity. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A policy, rule, price, threshold, approval path, quota, eligibility standard, matching rule, or information barrier blocks activity that would otherwise create mutual or system value.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A policy, rule, price, threshold, approval path, quota, eligibility standard, matching rule, or information barrier blocks activity that would otherwise create mutual or system value.", "Use this archetype when a rule, price, approval path, threshold, matching process, or allocation constraint blocks otherwise beneficial exchange, use, coordination, or capacity."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Deadweight Loss", "one_liner": "Lost surplus.", "page_ref": "prime:deadweight_loss", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Policy/price barrier -> wedge; blocked mutual value -> lost gains from trade.", "slug": "deadweight_loss", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a distortive wedge to block mutually beneficial market activity and destroy total surplus."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A policy, rule, price, threshold, approval path, quota, eligibility standard, matching rule, or information barrier blocks activity that would otherwise create mutual or system value.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Deadweight loss can exist without a visible shortage, queue, workaround, idle capacity, or other listed manifestation.", "slug": "deadweight_loss"}], "residual_id": "r:deadweight_loss_reduction:b019_a14_c2", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b019_a14_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It fits when there is evidence of shortage, surplus, idle capacity, excessive waiting, workarounds, avoidable compliance burden, or high-value demand that cannot connect to available supply. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: There is visible shortage, surplus, idle capacity, congestion, underuse, overuse, queuing, black-market workaround, or high-value demand that cannot connect to available supply.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["There is visible shortage, surplus, idle capacity, congestion, underuse, overuse, queuing, black-market workaround, or high-value demand that cannot connect to available supply.", "It fits when there is evidence of shortage, surplus, idle capacity, excessive waiting, workarounds, avoidable compliance burden, or high-value demand that cannot connect to available supply."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Deadweight loss can exist without a visible shortage, queue, workaround, idle capacity, or other listed manifestation.", "slug": "deadweight_loss"}], "normalized_requirement": "There is visible shortage, surplus, idle capacity, congestion, underuse, overuse, queuing, black-market workaround, or high-value demand that cannot connect to available supply.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "There is visible shortage, surplus, idle capacity, congestion, underuse, overuse, queuing, black-market workaround, or high-value demand that cannot connect to available supply.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P025-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O4", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O4", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O4", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a barrier, rule, friction, or equivalent constraint as the focal object.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A barrier is the object being assessed.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the present, appearance-qualified comparison against necessity rather than merely high absolute magnitude.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The barrier now appears larger than necessary in a listed dimension.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This purpose-timing branch requires a purpose served at the present time.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The barrier currently serves a purpose.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This purpose-timing branch requires a past purpose even if it is no longer served.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The barrier served a purpose formerly.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This dimension branch requires excess scope.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The barrier’s scope appears larger than necessary.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This dimension branch requires an excessive level or magnitude.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The barrier’s level appears larger than necessary.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This dimension branch requires an unnecessarily extensive or burdensome process.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The barrier’s process appears larger than necessary.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This dimension branch requires excessive side effects.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The barrier’s side effects appear larger than necessary.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "The barrier serves or once served a purpose, but its scope, level, process, or side effects now appear larger than necessary.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A barrier that serves or once served a purpose now appears excessive in a listed dimension.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P025-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A proportionality analysis can concern a newly proposed measure and does not require a value-blocking barrier that once served a purpose.", "slug": "proportionality"}], "residual_id": "r:deadweight_loss_reduction:b019_a14_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b019_a14_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Actors may be willing to exchange, coordinate, use capacity, or allocate resources more productively, but a rule, price, barrier, or process makes that action irrational, illegal, slow, risky, or impossible. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The barrier serves or once served a purpose, but its scope, level, process, or side effects now appear larger than necessary.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The barrier serves or once served a purpose, but its scope, level, process, or side effects now appear larger than necessary.", "Actors may be willing to exchange, coordinate, use capacity, or allocate resources more productively, but a rule, price, barrier, or process makes that action irrational, illegal, slow, risky, or impossible."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A proportionality analysis can concern a newly proposed measure and does not require a value-blocking barrier that once served a purpose.", "slug": "proportionality"}], "normalized_requirement": "The barrier serves or once served a purpose, but its scope, level, process, or side effects now appear larger than necessary.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The barrier serves or once served a purpose, but its scope, level, process, or side effects now appear larger than necessary.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime is welfare loss caused by a distortion that changes quantity and blocks gains from trade, not mere inconvenience.", "role_mapping": "Behavior change -> quantity distortion; prevented value -> lost surplus.", "slug": "deadweight_loss", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b019_a14_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A rule, price, friction, or allocation constraint prevents otherwise beneficial exchange, use, coordination, or resource movement by creating a wedge between private action and achievable value. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The loss is not merely inconvenience; it changes behavior enough to prevent beneficial activity, distort allocation, or destroy value.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The loss is not merely inconvenience; it changes behavior enough to prevent beneficial activity, distort allocation, or destroy value.", "A rule, price, friction, or allocation constraint prevents otherwise beneficial exchange, use, coordination, or resource movement by creating a wedge between private action and achievable value."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Deadweight Loss", "one_liner": "Lost surplus.", "page_ref": "prime:deadweight_loss", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Behavior change -> quantity distortion; prevented value -> lost surplus.", "slug": "deadweight_loss", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime is welfare loss caused by a distortion that changes quantity and blocks gains from trade, not mere inconvenience."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The loss is not merely inconvenience; it changes behavior enough to prevent beneficial activity, distort allocation, or destroy value.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Affected parties can identify a feasible redesign that preserves the legitimate protection while reducing avoidable loss.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Deadweight loss reduction must recover value destroyed by avoidable wedges without treating safety, rights, fairness, externality control, public finance, or public goods as mere inefficiencies. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: Affected parties can identify a feasible redesign that preserves the legitimate protection while reducing avoidable loss. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Affected parties can identify a feasible redesign that preserves the legitimate protection while reducing avoidable loss.", "Deadweight loss reduction must recover value destroyed by avoidable wedges without treating safety, rights, fairness, externality control, public finance, or public goods as mere inefficiencies."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Affected parties can identify a feasible redesign that preserves the legitimate protection while reducing avoidable loss."}, {"display_text": "A first-pass transaction-cost, price-signal, or externality interpretation is insufficient because the main issue is a general wedge between potential value and realized action.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The structural problem is a wedge between potential value and realized behavior. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: A first-pass transaction-cost, price-signal, or externality interpretation is insufficient because the main issue is a general wedge between potential value and realized action. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A first-pass transaction-cost, price-signal, or externality interpretation is insufficient because the main issue is a general wedge between potential value and realized action.", "The structural problem is a wedge between potential value and realized behavior."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "A first-pass transaction-cost, price-signal, or externality interpretation is insufficient because the main issue is a general wedge between potential value and realized action."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 19, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-019", "ledger_sha256": "58156252558001ee8819c0176a1fcde7974c6d0268e7e7da184436d67b8e4ead"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Decentralized Phase Locking", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:decentralized_phase_locking", "slug": "decentralized_phase_locking"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 5, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 8 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 8}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Independent oscillators have intrinsic timing. Even nominally identical units differ because of manufacturing variation, metabolism, workload, attention, environment, path history, or measurement error. Left uncoupled, their phases drift. Coupled too strongly, they may sacrifice viable local behavior and transmit every disturbance. The intervention problem is to find a region in which local influence overcomes relevant detuning without turning the population into one brittle fault domain.\n\nTopology is part of the problem, not plumbing. A ring, lattice, sparse peer graph, modular network, dynamic neighborhood, and dense all-to-all graph can produce different capture speeds, clusters, traveling waves, and failure exposure. A design that locks on the nominal graph may fragment when bridge nodes disappear. A graph that looks globally coherent may conceal stable subgroups whose phase relation matters to function or equity.\n\nDelay complicates local correction. The phase error a unit observes is already old. A strong response to stale evidence can cause chasing: each unit corrects toward where its neighbor was, overshoots, and generates repeated phase slips. Noise can blur evidence, but modest variation can also help a population escape an undesirable lock. Detuning, delay, noise, gain, and topology must be evaluated together.\n\nThe deepest structural tension is that synchrony has no universally correct maximum. High coherence can improve transfer and coordination, yet eliminate resilience, independent sensing, expressive timing, ecological spread, or safe resource staggering. Therefore the design cannot be “maximize alignment.” It must specify a functional band, a cost model, subgroup evidence, and an escape condition.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Independent recurring processes drift because their natural frequencies, phase offsets, delays, and disturbances differ. A central schedule may be unavailable, too slow, fragile, illegitimate, or incompatible with local autonomy. Uncalibrated coupling then leaves units incoherent, locks only a subset, creates unstable phase slips, or forces dangerous simultaneous action. The structural gap is not merely choosing a calendar; it is making a stable macro-level timing relation emerge from local interactions under heterogeneity and uncertainty."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires multiple independent oscillating processes with identifiable phase or timing.", "role_mapping": "Units -> oscillators; recurrence/phase -> oscillator state.", "slug": "synchronization", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime requires multiple independent processes with heterogeneous natural periods and a phase-relationship matrix.", "role_mapping": "Units -> oscillators; timing -> phase and natural period.", "slug": "temporal_synchronization_and_phase_alignment", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b019_a15_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "They must be able to observe some timing evidence and change their next event, rate, or phase at least slightly. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Multiple units exhibit identifiable recurrence, phase, pulse, cycle, or event timing.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Multiple units exhibit identifiable recurrence, phase, pulse, cycle, or event timing.", "They must be able to observe some timing evidence and change their next event, rate, or phase at least slightly."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Synchronization", "one_liner": "The emergence of stable shared timing or phase among independent oscillating processes through local coupling, without any central conductor.", "page_ref": "prime:synchronization", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Units -> oscillators; recurrence/phase -> oscillator state.", "slug": "synchronization", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires multiple independent oscillating processes with identifiable phase or timing."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Temporal Synchronization and Phase Alignment", "one_liner": "Phase alignment or misalignment determines efficiency and coherence.", "page_ref": "prime:temporal_synchronization_and_phase_alignment", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Units -> oscillators; timing -> phase and natural period.", "slug": "temporal_synchronization_and_phase_alignment", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires multiple independent processes with heterogeneous natural periods and a phase-relationship matrix."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Multiple units exhibit identifiable recurrence, phase, pulse, cycle, or event timing.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires local coupling through which each oscillator's phase influences neighboring oscillators.", "role_mapping": "Units -> oscillators; peer timing signals -> local phase coupling.", "slug": "synchronization", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b019_a15_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "They must be able to observe some timing evidence and change their next event, rate, or phase at least slightly. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Units can observe or receive bounded timing signals from at least some peers.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Units can observe or receive bounded timing signals from at least some peers.", "They must be able to observe some timing evidence and change their next event, rate, or phase at least slightly."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Synchronization", "one_liner": "The emergence of stable shared timing or phase among independent oscillating processes through local coupling, without any central conductor.", "page_ref": "prime:synchronization", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Units -> oscillators; peer timing signals -> local phase coupling.", "slug": "synchronization", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires local coupling through which each oscillator's phase influences neighboring oscillators."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Units can observe or receive bounded timing signals from at least some peers.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's collective coherence is defined by stable shared timing or phase produced by coupling.", "role_mapping": "Coordination -> collective rhythm; relative phase -> phase coherence.", "slug": "synchronization", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime explicitly makes efficiency and coherence depend on the relative phase relationship among processes.", "role_mapping": "Useful coordination -> efficiency/coherence; phase/frequency -> relationship matrix.", "slug": "temporal_synchronization_and_phase_alignment", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b019_a15_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when several units recur on their own clocks, useful coordination depends on relative timing, and a permanent conductor is unavailable or undesirable. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Useful coordination depends on relative phase, frequency, or bounded timing error.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Useful coordination depends on relative phase, frequency, or bounded timing error.", "Use this archetype when several units recur on their own clocks, useful coordination depends on relative timing, and a permanent conductor is unavailable or undesirable."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Synchronization", "one_liner": "The emergence of stable shared timing or phase among independent oscillating processes through local coupling, without any central conductor.", "page_ref": "prime:synchronization", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Coordination -> collective rhythm; relative phase -> phase coherence.", "slug": "synchronization", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's collective coherence is defined by stable shared timing or phase produced by coupling."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Temporal Synchronization and Phase Alignment", "one_liner": "Phase alignment or misalignment determines efficiency and coherence.", "page_ref": "prime:temporal_synchronization_and_phase_alignment", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Useful coordination -> efficiency/coherence; phase/frequency -> relationship matrix.", "slug": "temporal_synchronization_and_phase_alignment", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime explicitly makes efficiency and coherence depend on the relative phase relationship among processes."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Useful coordination depends on relative phase, frequency, or bounded timing error.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime definitionally produces global phase coherence through local coupling without any central conductor.", "role_mapping": "No conductor -> decentralized emergence; local peers -> coupling.", "slug": "synchronization", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b019_a15_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when several units recur on their own clocks, useful coordination depends on relative timing, and a permanent conductor is unavailable or undesirable. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: No permanent central conductor is available, trusted, scalable, or desirable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["No permanent central conductor is available, trusted, scalable, or desirable.", "Use this archetype when several units recur on their own clocks, useful coordination depends on relative timing, and a permanent conductor is unavailable or undesirable."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Synchronization", "one_liner": "The emergence of stable shared timing or phase among independent oscillating processes through local coupling, without any central conductor.", "page_ref": "prime:synchronization", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "No conductor -> decentralized emergence; local peers -> coupling.", "slug": "synchronization", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime definitionally produces global phase coherence through local coupling without any central conductor."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "No permanent central conductor is available, trusted, scalable, or desirable.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Heterogeneous oscillators can remain destructively misaligned, and the prime does not guarantee feasible mutual capture.", "slug": "temporal_synchronization_and_phase_alignment"}], "residual_id": "r:decentralized_phase_locking:b019_a15_c5", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b019_a15_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Independent recurring processes drift because their natural frequencies, phase offsets, delays, and disturbances differ. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Natural frequencies differ but overlap enough that mutual capture may be feasible.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Natural frequencies differ but overlap enough that mutual capture may be feasible.", "Independent recurring processes drift because their natural frequencies, phase offsets, delays, and disturbances differ."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Heterogeneous oscillators can remain destructively misaligned, and the prime does not guarantee feasible mutual capture.", "slug": "temporal_synchronization_and_phase_alignment"}], "normalized_requirement": "Natural frequencies differ but overlap enough that mutual capture may be feasible.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Natural frequencies differ but overlap enough that mutual capture may be feasible.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires local coupling strength and topology to govern the transition from incoherence to collective phase locking.", "role_mapping": "Topology/coupling -> oscillator graph; coherence -> synchronized regime.", "slug": "synchronization", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b019_a15_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Detuning, delay, noise, gain, and topology must be evaluated together. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Interaction topology, coupling strength, latency, or noise materially affects coherence.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Interaction topology, coupling strength, latency, or noise materially affects coherence.", "Detuning, delay, noise, gain, and topology must be evaluated together."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Synchronization", "one_liner": "The emergence of stable shared timing or phase among independent oscillating processes through local coupling, without any central conductor.", "page_ref": "prime:synchronization", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Topology/coupling -> oscillator graph; coherence -> synchronized regime.", "slug": "synchronization", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires local coupling strength and topology to govern the transition from incoherence to collective phase locking."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Interaction topology, coupling strength, latency, or noise materially affects coherence.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime can produce full global coherence and does not require partial synchronization to be preferable.", "slug": "synchronization"}], "residual_id": "r:decentralized_phase_locking:b019_a15_c7", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b019_a15_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A ring, lattice, sparse peer graph, modular network, dynamic neighborhood, and dense all-to-all graph can produce different capture speeds, clusters, traveling waves, and failure exposure. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Partial, clustered, traveling-wave, or intermittent synchrony may be preferable to unanimity.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Partial, clustered, traveling-wave, or intermittent synchrony may be preferable to unanimity.", "A ring, lattice, sparse peer graph, modular network, dynamic neighborhood, and dense all-to-all graph can produce different capture speeds, clusters, traveling waves, and failure exposure."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime can produce full global coherence and does not require partial synchronization to be preferable.", "slug": "synchronization"}], "normalized_requirement": "Partial, clustered, traveling-wave, or intermittent synchrony may be preferable to unanimity.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Partial, clustered, traveling-wave, or intermittent synchrony may be preferable to unanimity.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P025-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve shared or correlated timing rather than an isolated event time.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Timing is correlated across multiple activities or units.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve possibility and need not require that the outcomes have already occurred.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The correlated timing is capable of creating the outcomes.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve correlated timing as a possible directed cause of the outcomes without requiring that either outcome has already occurred.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The correlated timing can create the outcomes.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve benefit as a possible consequence of the correlated timing.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A benefit is one outcome the correlated timing can create.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve system-level risk as a possible consequence of the correlated timing.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Systemic risk is one outcome the correlated timing can create.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require joint capability for both outcomes from the same timing condition, without strengthening capability to realized coexistence.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The same correlated timing condition can create both benefit and systemic risk.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}], "predicate": "Correlated timing can create both benefit and systemic risk.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Correlated timing can create both benefit and systemic risk.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P025-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Systemic risk can arise from non-temporal coupling and does not require a coordination benefit from correlated timing.", "slug": "systemic_risk"}], "residual_id": "r:decentralized_phase_locking:b019_a15_c8", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b019_a15_c8", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Correlated timing can create both benefit and systemic risk. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Correlated timing can create both benefit and systemic risk."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Systemic risk can arise from non-temporal coupling and does not require a coordination benefit from correlated timing.", "slug": "systemic_risk"}], "normalized_requirement": "Correlated timing can create both benefit and systemic risk.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Correlated timing can create both benefit and systemic risk.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [8], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 19, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-019", "ledger_sha256": "58156252558001ee8819c0176a1fcde7974c6d0268e7e7da184436d67b8e4ead"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Deception Blowback Containment", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:deception_blowback_containment", "slug": "deception_blowback_containment"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 5, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A misleading signal is deliberately placed into a channel whose future path cannot be fully controlled. Because the signal is designed to be believable, it can return through allies, archives, analytics, rumors, media, models, training data, institutional memory, or future planning cycles and be mistaken for genuine evidence by the originator's own system.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A misleading signal is deliberately placed into a channel whose future path cannot be fully controlled. Because the signal is designed to be believable, it can return through allies, archives, analytics, rumors, media, models, training data, institutional memory, or future planning cycles and be mistaken for genuine evidence by the originator's own system."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Blowback can follow an ongoing or unbounded deceptive campaign and need not originate in a bounded strategic, testing, protective, or experimental purpose.", "slug": "deception_blowback"}], "residual_id": "r:deception_blowback_containment:b020_a01_c1", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b020_a01_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A misleading signal is deliberately placed into a channel whose future path cannot be fully controlled. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: An actor intentionally releases or stages a false, partial, decoy, cover, or misleading signal for a bounded strategic, testing, protective, or experimental purpose.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["An actor intentionally releases or stages a false, partial, decoy, cover, or misleading signal for a bounded strategic, testing, protective, or experimental purpose.", "A misleading signal is deliberately placed into a channel whose future path cannot be fully controlled."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Blowback can follow an ongoing or unbounded deceptive campaign and need not originate in a bounded strategic, testing, protective, or experimental purpose.", "slug": "deception_blowback"}], "normalized_requirement": "An actor intentionally releases or stages a false, partial, decoy, cover, or misleading signal for a bounded strategic, testing, protective, or experimental purpose.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "An actor intentionally releases or stages a false, partial, decoy, cover, or misleading signal for a bounded strategic, testing, protective, or experimental purpose.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a shared channel consulted by both the adversary and the deceiver's own side.", "role_mapping": "Listed carrier -> shared channel; not isolated -> unintended return path possible.", "slug": "deception_blowback", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b020_a01_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A misleading signal is deliberately placed into a channel whose future path cannot be fully controlled. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The signal uses a shared channel, public environment, reusable record, automated pipeline, or social network rather than a perfectly isolated laboratory.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The signal uses a shared channel, public environment, reusable record, automated pipeline, or social network rather than a perfectly isolated laboratory.", "A misleading signal is deliberately placed into a channel whose future path cannot be fully controlled."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Deception Blowback", "one_liner": "A misleading signal injected into a shared channel to deceive an adversary returns through an unintended path to confuse the deceiver's own decision loop, allies, downstream systems, or future selves, at a cost the original calculation never scored.", "page_ref": "prime:deception_blowback", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Listed carrier -> shared channel; not isolated -> unintended return path possible.", "slug": "deception_blowback", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a shared channel consulted by both the adversary and the deceiver's own side."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The signal uses a shared channel, public environment, reusable record, automated pipeline, or social network rather than a perfectly isolated laboratory.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires an unintended return path to allies, downstream systems, future selves, or the deceiver's decision loop after contextual memory erodes.", "role_mapping": "Listed receiver -> own-side consumer; detached provenance -> temporal/context drift.", "slug": "deception_blowback", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b020_a01_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Because the signal is designed to be believable, it can return through allies, archives, analytics, rumors, media, models, training data, institutional memory, or future planning cycles and be mistaken for genuine evidence by the originator's own system. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Trusted insiders, allies, downstream teams, auditors, future staff, or automated systems can encounter the signal without the original intent and provenance attached.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Trusted insiders, allies, downstream teams, auditors, future staff, or automated systems can encounter the signal without the original intent and provenance attached.", "Because the signal is designed to be believable, it can return through allies, archives, analytics, rumors, media, models, training data, institutional memory, or future planning cycles and be mistaken for genuine evidence by the originator's own system."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Deception Blowback", "one_liner": "A misleading signal injected into a shared channel to deceive an adversary returns through an unintended path to confuse the deceiver's own decision loop, allies, downstream systems, or future selves, at a cost the original calculation never scored.", "page_ref": "prime:deception_blowback", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Listed receiver -> own-side consumer; detached provenance -> temporal/context drift.", "slug": "deception_blowback", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires an unintended return path to allies, downstream systems, future selves, or the deceiver's decision loop after contextual memory erodes."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Trusted insiders, allies, downstream teams, auditors, future staff, or automated systems can encounter the signal without the original intent and provenance attached.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A misleading signal can produce blowback only because it is credible enough to alter the state of receivers that encounter it.", "role_mapping": "Credibility -> deceptive efficacy; update -> contaminated belief/action/record.", "slug": "deception_blowback", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b020_a01_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The deception must look credible enough that ordinary receivers would update beliefs, actions, or records on contact with it. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The deception must look credible enough that ordinary receivers would update beliefs, actions, or records on contact with it."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Deception Blowback", "one_liner": "A misleading signal injected into a shared channel to deceive an adversary returns through an unintended path to confuse the deceiver's own decision loop, allies, downstream systems, or future selves, at a cost the original calculation never scored.", "page_ref": "prime:deception_blowback", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Credibility -> deceptive efficacy; update -> contaminated belief/action/record.", "slug": "deception_blowback", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A misleading signal can produce blowback only because it is credible enough to alter the state of receivers that encounter it."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The deception must look credible enough that ordinary receivers would update beliefs, actions, or records on contact with it.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's segregation discipline fails and temporal drift erodes memory of which records were deliberate deceptions.", "role_mapping": "No cleanup -> failed segregation; served purpose -> signal persists beyond target window.", "slug": "deception_blowback", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b020_a01_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A misleading signal is deliberately placed into a channel whose future path cannot be fully controlled. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: There is no reliable sunset, recall, debriefing, quarantine, or re-labeling mechanism after the misleading signal has served its narrow purpose.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["There is no reliable sunset, recall, debriefing, quarantine, or re-labeling mechanism after the misleading signal has served its narrow purpose.", "A misleading signal is deliberately placed into a channel whose future path cannot be fully controlled."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Deception Blowback", "one_liner": "A misleading signal injected into a shared channel to deceive an adversary returns through an unintended path to confuse the deceiver's own decision loop, allies, downstream systems, or future selves, at a cost the original calculation never scored.", "page_ref": "prime:deception_blowback", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "No cleanup -> failed segregation; served purpose -> signal persists beyond target window.", "slug": "deception_blowback", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's segregation discipline fails and temporal drift erodes memory of which records were deliberate deceptions."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "There is no reliable sunset, recall, debriefing, quarantine, or re-labeling mechanism after the misleading signal has served its narrow purpose.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires the deceiver's own later decision loop or downstream systems to re-consume the misleading signal through an unintended path.", "role_mapping": "Later dependency -> own-side decision loop; absorbed signal -> blowback return.", "slug": "deception_blowback", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b020_a01_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A misleading signal is deliberately placed into a channel whose future path cannot be fully controlled. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The organization later depends on environmental scans, records, dashboards, model outputs, briefings, or external reports that may have absorbed the misleading signal.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The organization later depends on environmental scans, records, dashboards, model outputs, briefings, or external reports that may have absorbed the misleading signal.", "A misleading signal is deliberately placed into a channel whose future path cannot be fully controlled."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Deception Blowback", "one_liner": "A misleading signal injected into a shared channel to deceive an adversary returns through an unintended path to confuse the deceiver's own decision loop, allies, downstream systems, or future selves, at a cost the original calculation never scored.", "page_ref": "prime:deception_blowback", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Later dependency -> own-side decision loop; absorbed signal -> blowback return.", "slug": "deception_blowback", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires the deceiver's own later decision loop or downstream systems to re-consume the misleading signal through an unintended path."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The organization later depends on environmental scans, records, dashboards, model outputs, briefings, or external reports that may have absorbed the misleading signal.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 20, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-020", "ledger_sha256": "2c76bd49d32c5e09a63f9c0dbbd7c00102d31034b390a82226859edc9a7b4a6f"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Decision Commitment and Closure", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:decision_commitment_and_closure", "slug": "decision_commitment_and_closure"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 5, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "An actor or group has generated and compared plausible alternatives but lacks a reliable boundary between deliberation and commitment. Choices remain ambiguous, repeatedly reopen, or are announced without authority, rationale, ownership, or execution consequences.\n", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "An actor or group has generated and compared plausible alternatives but lacks a reliable boundary between deliberation and commitment. Choices remain ambiguous, repeatedly reopen, or are announced without authority, rationale, ownership, or execution consequences."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P025-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve more than one option and the feasibility of each option considered separately.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Multiple options are available and viable.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve impossibility of joint pursuit without strengthening it to impossibility of pursuing any option.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The viable options cannot all be pursued.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must make the finite time, capacity, or authority boundary the reason joint pursuit is impossible.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The available constraint prevents pursuit of all options.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires insufficient time to prevent pursuit of all viable options.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Available time is the binding constraint.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires insufficient capacity to prevent pursuit of all viable options.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Available capacity is the binding constraint.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires insufficient authority to prevent pursuit of all viable options.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "Available authority is the binding constraint.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Multiple viable options cannot all be pursued within available time, capacity, or authority.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Multiple viable options cannot all be pursued because a listed available constraint is insufficient.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P025-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A decision can choose among mutually exclusive preferences even when time, capacity, and authority would permit all options.", "slug": "decision"}], "residual_id": "r:decision_commitment_and_closure:b020_a02_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b020_a02_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Committing too early suppresses learning and creates avoidable lock-in; committing too late spends time and option value without producing coordinated action. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Multiple viable options cannot all be pursued within available time, capacity, or authority.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Multiple viable options cannot all be pursued within available time, capacity, or authority.", "Committing too early suppresses learning and creates avoidable lock-in; committing too late spends time and option value without producing coordinated action."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A decision can choose among mutually exclusive preferences even when time, capacity, and authority would permit all options.", "slug": "decision"}], "normalized_requirement": "Multiple viable options cannot all be pursued within available time, capacity, or authority.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Multiple viable options cannot all be pursued within available time, capacity, or authority.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P026-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve additional analysis or information gathering as the incremental activity.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Further analysis is the activity whose marginal value is assessed.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve diminishing incremental value rather than low total value or constant returns.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The marginal value of further analysis is falling.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve concurrency between diminishing returns to analysis and continued delay.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Delay occurs while the marginal value is falling.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve consequential rather than negligible cost or risk from delay.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The delay consequence is material.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires cost as the material consequence of delay.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Delay has material cost.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires risk as the material consequence of delay.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "Delay has material risk.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "The marginal value of more analysis is falling while delay has material cost or risk.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "The marginal value of further analysis is falling while delay carries a material cost or risk.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P026-C01-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Information can retain high marginal value and need not be paired with material delay cost.", "slug": "value_of_information"}], "residual_id": "r:decision_commitment_and_closure:b020_a02_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b020_a02_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The marginal value of more analysis is falling while delay has material cost or risk. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The marginal value of more analysis is falling while delay has material cost or risk."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Information can retain high marginal value and need not be paired with material delay cost.", "slug": "value_of_information"}], "normalized_requirement": "The marginal value of more analysis is falling while delay has material cost or risk.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The marginal value of more analysis is falling while delay has material cost or risk.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P026-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve multiple participants as actors in the disagreement.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Participants are the parties holding conflicting judgments.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a common focal choice rather than unrelated participant preferences.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "One choice is the object whose status is disputed.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail conflicting judgments rather than diversity without disagreement.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The participants disagree about the choice.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must make finality, provisionality, preference-only status, or the equivalent commitment level the axis of disagreement.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The disputed attribute is the choice’s commitment status.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Participants disagree about whether a choice is final, provisional, or merely preferred.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Participants disagree about a choice’s commitment status.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P026-C02-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Consensus can concern substantive preference with a shared understanding of whether the decision is final.", "slug": "consensus"}], "residual_id": "r:decision_commitment_and_closure:b020_a02_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b020_a02_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Participants disagree about whether a choice is final, provisional, or merely preferred. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Participants disagree about whether a choice is final, provisional, or merely preferred."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Consensus can concern substantive preference with a shared understanding of whether the decision is final.", "slug": "consensus"}], "normalized_requirement": "Participants disagree about whether a choice is final, provisional, or merely preferred.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Participants disagree about whether a choice is final, provisional, or merely preferred.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P026-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an executable work process whose continuation is at issue.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Work is the process awaiting permission to proceed.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an option or course of action as the authorization target.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "One option is the target of authorization.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require blocked progression rather than merely slower or less confident work.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The work cannot proceed before authorization is present.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve formal or otherwise legitimate authorization rather than informal preference alone.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The option must receive legitimate authorization.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the until-ordering in which work proceeds only after the authorization prerequisite is met.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Legitimate authorization must precede work proceeding.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "Work cannot proceed until one option receives legitimate authorization.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Work cannot proceed until one option receives legitimate authorization.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P026-C03-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P026-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an executable work process whose continuation is at issue.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Work is the process awaiting permission to proceed.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an option or course of action as the object for which responsibility is assigned.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "One option is the object requiring ownership.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require blocked progression rather than merely slower or less confident work.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The work cannot proceed before ownership is present.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve ownership or accountable responsibility for the selected option.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "An owner must be assigned responsibility for the option.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the until-ordering in which work proceeds only after the ownership prerequisite is met.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Ownership must precede work proceeding.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "Work cannot proceed until one option receives ownership.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Work cannot proceed until one option has an owner.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P026-C03-U2"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A credible commitment can exist after work begins and does not require an authorization bottleneck among options.", "slug": "credible_commitment"}], "residual_id": "r:decision_commitment_and_closure:b020_a02_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b020_a02_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Work cannot proceed until one option receives legitimate authorization and ownership. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Work cannot proceed until one option receives legitimate authorization and ownership."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 2, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 2}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A credible commitment can exist after work begins and does not require an authorization bottleneck among options.", "slug": "credible_commitment"}], "normalized_requirement": "Work cannot proceed until one option receives legitimate authorization and ownership.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 2 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Work cannot proceed until one option receives legitimate authorization and ownership.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P026-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a decision point or comparable juncture as the demanding situation.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A juncture is the situation requiring resolution.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve overt commitment or closure rather than emergent or implicit resolution.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Explicit closure is the required response.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve uncertainty at the time explicit closure is required.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The closure occurs under uncertainty.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve necessity rather than merely permit or recommend closure.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The juncture requires explicit closure.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires sensitivity to timing or delay.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The juncture is time-sensitive.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a critical rather than ordinary decision point.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The juncture is critical.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "A time-sensitive or critical juncture requires explicit closure under uncertainty.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A time-sensitive or critical juncture requires explicit closure under uncertainty.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P026-C04-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A critical juncture can resolve through decentralized or emergent choice without an explicit closure procedure.", "slug": "critical_juncture"}], "residual_id": "r:decision_commitment_and_closure:b020_a02_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b020_a02_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A time-sensitive or critical juncture requires explicit closure under uncertainty. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A time-sensitive or critical juncture requires explicit closure under uncertainty."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A critical juncture can resolve through decentralized or emergent choice without an explicit closure procedure.", "slug": "critical_juncture"}], "normalized_requirement": "A time-sensitive or critical juncture requires explicit closure under uncertainty.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A time-sensitive or critical juncture requires explicit closure under uncertainty.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 20, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-020", "ledger_sha256": "2c76bd49d32c5e09a63f9c0dbbd7c00102d31034b390a82226859edc9a7b4a6f"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Decision Load Management", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:decision_load_management", "slug": "decision_load_management"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 5, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 6 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a mismatch between decision demand and decision capacity. Systems often assume that people can make an unlimited sequence of choices at the same quality level. In practice, repeated decisions consume attention, create context switching, increase irritability or avoidance, and push actors toward shortcuts that may be inappropriate for the stakes.\n\nDecision load becomes especially damaging when the system does not distinguish between decision classes. A trivial setting, routine approval, ambiguous exception, and irreversible tradeoff may all arrive through the same queue. The actor then spends attention where a standing rule would suffice and has less attention left where judgment is essential.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Decision quality falls because too many choices, poorly timed requests, repeated context switches, excessive option sets, or unclear authority exhaust limited attention and judgment. The problem is not merely that people feel tired; the decision environment repeatedly consumes high-quality deliberation where lower-cost structures would suffice."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Decision fatigue can result from fewer cognitively demanding high-stakes decisions and does not require recurrent low-stakes choices.", "slug": "decision_fatigue"}], "residual_id": "r:decision_load_management:b020_a03_c1", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b020_a03_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The pattern is especially relevant when low-stakes recurring decisions consume the same attention channel as high-stakes or novel decisions. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Many low-stakes decisions recur frequently.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Many low-stakes decisions recur frequently.", "The pattern is especially relevant when low-stakes recurring decisions consume the same attention channel as high-stakes or novel decisions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Decision fatigue can result from fewer cognitively demanding high-stakes decisions and does not require recurrent low-stakes choices.", "slug": "decision_fatigue"}], "normalized_requirement": "Many low-stakes decisions recur frequently.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Many low-stakes decisions recur frequently.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P026-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve decisions with materially high stakes as focal queue contents.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "High-stakes decisions are one class of queued item.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a common processing queue rather than separate streams or coincident timing.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "High-stakes and lower-stakes items occupy the same queue.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the stakes contrast rather than a homogeneous decision queue.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The queue mixes items of materially different stakes.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires routine approvals to share the queue with high-stakes decisions.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Routine approvals are the lower-stakes queue items.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires trivial choices to share the queue with high-stakes decisions.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Trivial choices are the lower-stakes queue items.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "High-stakes decisions are mixed into the same queue as routine approvals or trivial choices.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "High-stakes decisions share one queue with a listed lower-stakes choice type.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P026-C05-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A long homogeneous sequence can create fatigue without mixing stakes in one queue.", "slug": "decision_fatigue"}], "residual_id": "r:decision_load_management:b020_a03_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b020_a03_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A trivial setting, routine approval, ambiguous exception, and irreversible tradeoff may all arrive through the same queue. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: High-stakes decisions are mixed into the same queue as routine approvals or trivial choices.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["High-stakes decisions are mixed into the same queue as routine approvals or trivial choices.", "A trivial setting, routine approval, ambiguous exception, and irreversible tradeoff may all arrive through the same queue."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A long homogeneous sequence can create fatigue without mixing stakes in one queue.", "slug": "decision_fatigue"}], "normalized_requirement": "High-stakes decisions are mixed into the same queue as routine approvals or trivial choices.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "High-stakes decisions are mixed into the same queue as routine approvals or trivial choices.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P026-C06", "dnf": [], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [], "predicate": "Actors face large option sets.", "resolution": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RESIDUAL", "semantic_scope": "NON_ABSTRACTION", "structural_head": "Actors face an option set whose size is large.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P026-C06-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P026-C06", "dnf": [], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [], "predicate": "Actors face many attributes.", "resolution": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RESIDUAL", "semantic_scope": "NON_ABSTRACTION", "structural_head": "Actors face an attribute count classified as many.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P026-C06-U2"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P026-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve decision actors or equivalent evaluators as the focal users of the criteria.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Actors are the decision makers who must compare options.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve criteria for comparing alternatives rather than information or authority in general.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Comparison criteria are the basis needed to evaluate options.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require lack of clarity rather than merely plurality or complexity of clear criteria.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The comparison criteria are unclear to the actors.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Actors face unclear comparison criteria.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Actors lack clear criteria for comparing options.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P026-C06-U3"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Decision fatigue accumulates over a sequence and can occur when every individual choice has only two clear options.", "slug": "decision_fatigue"}], "residual_id": "r:decision_load_management:b020_a03_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b020_a03_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Decision quality falls because too many choices, poorly timed requests, repeated context switches, excessive option sets, or unclear authority exhaust limited attention and judgment. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Actors face large option sets, many attributes, or unclear comparison criteria.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Actors face large option sets, many attributes, or unclear comparison criteria.", "Decision quality falls because too many choices, poorly timed requests, repeated context switches, excessive option sets, or unclear authority exhaust limited attention and judgment."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 2, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Decision fatigue accumulates over a sequence and can occur when every individual choice has only two clear options.", "slug": "decision_fatigue"}], "normalized_requirement": "Actors face large option sets, many attributes, or unclear comparison criteria.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Actors face large option sets, many attributes, or unclear comparison criteria.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P026-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the decision-governance domain rather than generic unclear documentation.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The unclear element concerns decision rights or routing.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require insufficient clarity rather than a complex but explicit arrangement.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The focal element is unclear.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires uncertainty about who has authority to decide.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Decision authority is the unclear element.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires uncertainty about how decision authority is delegated.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A delegation path is the unclear element.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires uncertainty about how decisions are escalated.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "An escalation path is the unclear element.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}], "predicate": "Decision authority, delegation, or escalation paths are unclear.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A listed decision-rights or routing element is unclear.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P026-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Authority can be delegated through explicit envelopes and escalation rules, the opposite of an unclear path.", "slug": "authority_delegation_under_uncertainty"}], "residual_id": "r:decision_load_management:b020_a03_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b020_a03_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Decision quality falls because too many choices, poorly timed requests, repeated context switches, excessive option sets, or unclear authority exhaust limited attention and judgment. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Decision authority, delegation, or escalation paths are unclear.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Decision authority, delegation, or escalation paths are unclear.", "Decision quality falls because too many choices, poorly timed requests, repeated context switches, excessive option sets, or unclear authority exhaust limited attention and judgment."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Authority can be delegated through explicit envelopes and escalation rules, the opposite of an unclear path.", "slug": "authority_delegation_under_uncertainty"}], "normalized_requirement": "Decision authority, delegation, or escalation paths are unclear.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Decision authority, delegation, or escalation paths are unclear.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Decision fatigue can be recognized and managed rather than accompanied by a stable-quality assumption.", "slug": "decision_fatigue"}], "residual_id": "r:decision_load_management:b020_a03_c5", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b020_a03_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Systems often assume that people can make an unlimited sequence of choices at the same quality level. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The process assumes stable judgment quality across a long series of decisions.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The process assumes stable judgment quality across a long series of decisions.", "Systems often assume that people can make an unlimited sequence of choices at the same quality level."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Decision fatigue can be recognized and managed rather than accompanied by a stable-quality assumption.", "slug": "decision_fatigue"}], "normalized_requirement": "The process assumes stable judgment quality across a long series of decisions.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The process assumes stable judgment quality across a long series of decisions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires measurable decision-quality degradation correlated with sequence position or decision density.", "role_mapping": "Dense period -> volume accumulator; fatigue/errors -> downstream quality degradation.", "slug": "decision_fatigue", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b020_a03_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Fatigue, rework, inconsistent standards, or avoidable errors appear after dense decision periods. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Fatigue, rework, inconsistent standards, or avoidable errors appear after dense decision periods."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Decision Fatigue", "one_liner": "Reduced decision quality over time.", "page_ref": "prime:decision_fatigue", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Dense period -> volume accumulator; fatigue/errors -> downstream quality degradation.", "slug": "decision_fatigue", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires measurable decision-quality degradation correlated with sequence position or decision density."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Fatigue, rework, inconsistent standards, or avoidable errors appear after dense decision periods.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 20, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-020", "ledger_sha256": "2c76bd49d32c5e09a63f9c0dbbd7c00102d31034b390a82226859edc9a7b4a6f"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Decision-Procedure Boundary Mapping", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:decision_procedure_boundary_mapping", "slug": "decision_procedure_boundary_mapping"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 3, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 7 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 7}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system, organization, contract, policy, or model treats an open yes/no judgment as if it can always be answered by an algorithm or procedure. The actual question may be underspecified, depend on unbounded future information, require solving an undecidable class, lack a finite observation boundary, or be decidable only in theory but infeasible in practice. Without boundary mapping, teams build procedures that loop, time out silently, overclaim certainty, misclassify edge cases, or hide human judgment behind a false promise of total computation.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system, organization, contract, policy, or model treats an open yes/no judgment as if it can always be answered by an algorithm or procedure. The actual question may be underspecified, depend on unbounded future information, require solving an undecidable class, lack a finite observation boundary, or be decidable only in theory but infeasible in practice. Without boundary mapping, teams build procedures that loop, time out silently, overclaim certainty, misclassify edge cases, or hide human judgment behind a false promise of total computation."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P026-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O9"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O10"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a binary question rather than an open-ended inquiry.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A yes/no question is the item requiring resolution.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require repeated instances or repeated presentation, not one isolated question.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The yes/no question recurs.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve necessity of an answer rather than optional consideration.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The question must be answered.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a yes/no classification question.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The recurring question concerns classification.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a yes/no approval question.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The recurring question concerns approval.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a yes/no eligibility question.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The recurring question concerns eligibility.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a yes/no verification question.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The recurring question concerns verification.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a yes/no diagnostic question.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The recurring question concerns diagnosis.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a yes/no compliance question.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "The recurring question concerns compliance.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a yes/no proof question.", "obligation_id": "O10", "statement": "The recurring question concerns proof.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "A recurring yes/no classification, approval, eligibility, verification, diagnosis, compliance, or proof question must be answered.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A recurring yes/no question in a listed domain must be answered.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P026-C08-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Computability covers general functions and need not concern a recurring yes/no operative classification.", "slug": "computability"}], "residual_id": "r:decision_procedure_boundary_mapping:b020_a04_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b020_a04_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A recurring yes/no classification, approval, eligibility, verification, diagnosis, compliance, or proof question must be answered. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A recurring yes/no classification, approval, eligibility, verification, diagnosis, compliance, or proof question must be answered."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "I tested a one-off model check. It is a complete unguarded candidate and defeats recurrence, but it violates the every-revision cadence; with the guard present, every remaining instance satisfies the verification branch.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Model Checking", "one_liner": "Verify a system by taking a finite-state model plus a temporal-logic property and exhaustively exploring every reachable state to decide whether the property holds universally, returning a concrete counterexample trace on failure.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:model_checking", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2"], "guard_type": "TIMING_BINDING", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "model_check_repeats_each_revision", "predicate": "the model-property verification is scheduled on every model revision", "rationale": "The guard is one candidate-anchored fact, fills only the identified obligation, and neither restates the full head nor introduces a principal role."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "model_checking"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "model_check_repeats_each_revision"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "model_checking", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P026-C08-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record supplies a binary property-verification obligation and an exhaustive procedure that determines the answer. The guard adds only a recurrence cadence over the already named model-property check."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "I tested a one-time, context-sensitive significance analysis without a compulsory binary verdict. It lacks the institutionalised mechanical practice and full editorial authority that define the null ritual, so it does not survive as a counterexample.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Null Ritual", "one_liner": "The institutionalised practice of mechanically executing a null hypothesis significance test — nil-null, p-value, p < .05 verdict — severed from the alternatives, priors, effect sizes, and decision context inference requires, yet retaining full editorial authority as if it had not been.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:null_ritual", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "null_ritual"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "null_ritual", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P026-C08-U1", "why_it_fits": "Institutionalised mechanical execution entails recurrence; the bright-line reject/retain verdict supplies a yes/no classification, and journal/reviewer authority makes that verdict required rather than optional in each ritual instance."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "I tested a single completed formal proof for a frozen artifact. It defeats recurrence but violates the each-revision cadence; under the guard, the same proof question necessarily recurs.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Formal Verification", "one_liner": "Establish with the rigor of a theorem that an engineered artifact satisfies a precisely stated specification by producing a machine-checkable proof that holds over every input in scope at once, rather than sampling behavior on tested inputs the way testing does.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:formal_verification", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2"], "guard_type": "TIMING_BINDING", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "formal_proof_repeats_each_revision", "predicate": "the artifact-specification proof obligation recurs on each artifact revision", "rationale": "The guard is one candidate-anchored fact, fills only the identified obligation, and neither restates the full head nor introduces a principal role."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "formal_verification"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "formal_proof_repeats_each_revision"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "formal_verification", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P026-C08-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record supplies the artifact, specification, proof obligation, and theorem-grade answer. The qualifier adds only cadence to those existing roles and does not smuggle in a new verification relation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A recurring yes/no classification, approval, eligibility, verification, diagnosis, compliance, or proof question must be answered.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime is exactly the existence of a uniform finite procedure that terminates with the correct yes/no answer for every instance in a class.", "role_mapping": "Automatic repeatable procedure -> algorithm; finite/correct/all cases -> decidability guarantee.", "slug": "decidability_computability", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b020_a04_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Stakeholders want the answer to be automatic, repeatable, finite, and correct for all cases in scope. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders want the answer to be automatic, repeatable, finite, and correct for all cases in scope."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Decidability Computability", "one_liner": "A class of yes/no questions admits a finite procedure that always terminates with the correct answer.", "page_ref": "prime:decidability_computability", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Automatic repeatable procedure -> algorithm; finite/correct/all cases -> decidability guarantee.", "slug": "decidability_computability", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime is exactly the existence of a uniform finite procedure that terminates with the correct yes/no answer for every instance in a class."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Stakeholders want the answer to be automatic, repeatable, finite, and correct for all cases in scope.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P026-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O7"], ["O1", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O3", "O7"], ["O1", "O4", "O6"], ["O1", "O4", "O7"], ["O1", "O5", "O6"], ["O1", "O5", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an input, representation, predicate, or scope element rather than an unrelated project attribute.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The focal object is an element that specifies or bounds the decision question.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This element-group branch requires the possible inputs to be focal.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The input space is the focal specification element.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This element-group branch requires the input or question encoding to be focal.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The encoding is the focal specification element.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This element-group branch requires the decision predicate to be focal.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The predicate is the focal specification element.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This element-group branch requires the boundary of in-scope cases to be focal.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The scope boundary is the focal specification element.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This state-group branch requires insufficient clarity.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The focal specification element is unclear.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This state-group branch requires growth or widening over time.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The focal specification element is expanding.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "The input space, encoding, predicate, or scope boundary is unclear or expanding.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A listed specification element is unclear or expanding.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P026-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A clear stable partition can be drawn and need not involve a decision procedure or expanding scope.", "slug": "segmentation_and_boundary_drawing"}], "residual_id": "r:decision_procedure_boundary_mapping:b020_a04_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b020_a04_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Decision procedures gain legitimacy from termination and correctness, but real-world questions often blur their input domain, predicate, and evidence boundary. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The input space, encoding, predicate, or scope boundary is unclear or expanding.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The input space, encoding, predicate, or scope boundary is unclear or expanding.", "Decision procedures gain legitimacy from termination and correctness, but real-world questions often blur their input domain, predicate, and evidence boundary."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "I tested a fully specified authorization boundary with ambiguity only in an operator's unrelated factual perception. That is not the rule-grain mismatch defined by the exact candidate, so no counterexample to the scope-boundary branch survives.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Rules-of-Engagement Ambiguity", "one_liner": "Diagnose frontline breakdown under time pressure as a grain mismatch — decision rules written coarser than the environment generates choice points — paid out of a finite discretion budget, relocating the fix from the operator's judgment to the rule, escalation path, and pre-positioned authority.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:rules_of_engagement_ambiguity", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "rules_of_engagement_ambiguity"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "rules_of_engagement_ambiguity", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P026-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record's authorization boundary is a specification boundary for decision questions, and the candidate is constituted by that rule element being too coarse for encountered choice points."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "I tested disagreement caused only by careless annotators on clear interior examples. That lacks the boundary zone where reasonable experts split and therefore is not label ambiguity as exactly defined.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Label Ambiguity", "one_liner": "Diagnose a headline accuracy figure as a blend of two measurements — model capability in the class interior where annotators agree, and mere adjudication agreement in the boundary zone where reasonable experts split — by stratifying metrics on the inter-annotator agreement rate.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:label_ambiguity", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "label_ambiguity"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "label_ambiguity", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P026-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every complete exact instance contains a fuzzy class boundary that bounds the classification question and remains unclear precisely where reasonable experts split."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The input space, encoding, predicate, or scope boundary is unclear or expanding.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P026-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve existence of an affected subset without requiring all cases to be affected.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Some cases are the subjects of the requirement claim.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve appearance or provisional assessment rather than established necessity.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The cases appear to have the requirement.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve dependency of case resolution on search rather than on a non-search resource.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The affected cases require a search process.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve search without a fixed finite extent rather than merely a large bounded search.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The required search is unbounded.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}], "predicate": "Some cases appear to require unbounded search.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Some cases appear to require unbounded search.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P026-C10-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P026-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve existence of an affected subset without requiring all cases to be affected.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Some cases are the subjects of the requirement claim.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve appearance or provisional assessment rather than established necessity.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The cases appear to have the requirement.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve dependency of case resolution on evidential input.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The affected cases require evidence.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve that the evidence is not yet available at the current decision time.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The required evidence is future evidence.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "Some cases appear to require future evidence.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Some cases appear to require evidence that is not yet available.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P026-C10-U2"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P026-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve existence of an affected subset without requiring all cases to be affected.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Some cases are the subjects of the requirement claim.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve appearance or provisional assessment rather than established necessity.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The cases appear to have the requirement.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve dependency of case resolution on an interpretive act.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The affected cases require interpretation.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve interpretation of meaning rather than purely syntactic processing.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The required interpretation is semantic.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Some cases appear to require semantic interpretation.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Some cases appear to require interpretation of meaning.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P026-C10-U3"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P026-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve existence of an affected subset without requiring all cases to be affected.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Some cases are the subjects of the requirement claim.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve appearance or provisional assessment rather than established necessity.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The cases appear to have the requirement.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve dependency of case resolution on an act of judgment.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The affected cases require judgment.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a human judgment role rather than an exclusively mechanical procedure.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A human supplies the required judgment.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}], "predicate": "Some cases appear to require human judgment.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Some cases appear to require judgment by a human.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P026-C10-U4"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P026-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve existence of an affected subset without requiring all cases to be affected.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Some cases are the subjects of the requirement claim.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve appearance or provisional assessment rather than established necessity.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The cases appear to have the requirement.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve dependency of case resolution on an authorizing role or power.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The affected cases require authority.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve authority outside the procedure or workflow making the decision.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The required authority is external to the deciding procedure.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}], "predicate": "Some cases appear to require external authority.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Some cases appear to require authority external to the deciding procedure.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P026-C10-U5"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A computable function has a terminating procedure and does not entail cases needing future evidence, semantic judgment, or external authority.", "slug": "computability"}], "residual_id": "r:decision_procedure_boundary_mapping:b020_a04_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b020_a04_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The actual question may be underspecified, depend on unbounded future information, require solving an undecidable class, lack a finite observation boundary, or be decidable only in theory but infeasible in practice. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Some cases appear to require unbounded search, future evidence, semantic interpretation, human judgment, or external authority.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Some cases appear to require unbounded search, future evidence, semantic interpretation, human judgment, or external authority.", "The actual question may be underspecified, depend on unbounded future information, require solving an undecidable class, lack a finite observation boundary, or be decidable only in theory but infeasible in practice."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 5, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 5}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A computable function has a terminating procedure and does not entail cases needing future evidence, semantic judgment, or external authority.", "slug": "computability"}], "normalized_requirement": "Some cases appear to require unbounded search, future evidence, semantic interpretation, human judgment, or external authority.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 5 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Some cases appear to require unbounded search, future evidence, semantic interpretation, human judgment, or external authority.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P026-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a workflow or decision procedure as the focal process.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A workflow is the process exhibiting the behavior.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve inability to decide as the condition for the behavior.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The workflow cannot decide the case.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve possibility rather than require every indecisive workflow to behave this way.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The workflow may exhibit the behavior.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve return to a prior workflow state rather than another failure mechanism.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The workflow may loop under the inability-to-decide condition.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "A workflow may loop when it cannot decide.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "When unable to decide, a workflow may loop.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P026-C11-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P026-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a workflow or decision procedure as the focal process.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A workflow is the process exhibiting the behavior.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve inability to decide as the condition for the behavior.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The workflow cannot decide the case.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve possibility rather than require every indecisive workflow to behave this way.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The workflow may exhibit the behavior.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve escalation to another level or actor rather than looping or timeout.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The workflow may escalate under the inability-to-decide condition.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the absence of a terminating escalation bound.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The escalation may continue indefinitely.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}], "predicate": "A workflow may escalate indefinitely when it cannot decide.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "When unable to decide, a workflow may escalate indefinitely.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P026-C11-U2"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P026-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a workflow or decision procedure as the focal process.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A workflow is the process exhibiting the behavior.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve inability to decide as the condition for the behavior.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The workflow cannot decide the case.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve possibility rather than require every indecisive workflow to behave this way.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The workflow may exhibit the behavior.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve expiry of an allotted time as the termination mechanism.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The workflow may terminate by timeout rather than by deciding the case.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "A workflow may time out when it cannot decide.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "When unable to decide, a workflow may terminate by timeout.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P026-C11-U3"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P026-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a workflow or decision procedure as the focal process.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A workflow is the process exhibiting the behavior.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve inability to decide as the condition for the behavior.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The workflow cannot decide the case.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve possibility rather than require every indecisive workflow to behave this way.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The workflow may exhibit the behavior.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve output of a default rather than looping, escalation, or timeout alone.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The workflow may return a default result.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve arbitrariness of the default, not a principled fallback decision.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The returned default is arbitrary rather than justified by deciding the case.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "A workflow may return an arbitrary default when it cannot decide.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "When unable to decide, a workflow may return an arbitrary default.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P026-C11-U4"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A stage-gate process can terminate cleanly and need not contain an undecidable question or arbitrary default.", "slug": "stage_gate_process"}], "residual_id": "r:decision_procedure_boundary_mapping:b020_a04_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b020_a04_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Without boundary mapping, teams build procedures that loop, time out silently, overclaim certainty, misclassify edge cases, or hide human judgment behind a false promise of total computation. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A workflow may loop, escalate indefinitely, time out, or return an arbitrary default when it cannot decide.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A workflow may loop, escalate indefinitely, time out, or return an arbitrary default when it cannot decide.", "Without boundary mapping, teams build procedures that loop, time out silently, overclaim certainty, misclassify edge cases, or hide human judgment behind a false promise of total computation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 4, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 4}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A stage-gate process can terminate cleanly and need not contain an undecidable question or arbitrary default.", "slug": "stage_gate_process"}], "normalized_requirement": "A workflow may loop, escalate indefinitely, time out, or return an arbitrary default when it cannot decide.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 4 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A workflow may loop, escalate indefinitely, time out, or return an arbitrary default when it cannot decide.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P026-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve boundary or exceptional cases as the revealing instances.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Edge cases are the instances that expose the disagreement.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve conflicting judgments rather than mere uncertainty by one evaluator.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "There is disagreement about the applicable standard.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must link the visibility of disagreement to encounter with edge cases.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The edge cases expose the disagreement.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires disagreement over what counts as correct.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Correctness is the disputed standard.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires disagreement over what counts as complete.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Completeness is the disputed standard.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires disagreement over what counts as in scope.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "Scope inclusion is the disputed standard.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Edge cases expose disagreement about what counts as correct, complete, or in-scope.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Edge cases expose disagreement about a listed adequacy standard.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P026-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A schema can omit a case without stakeholders disagreeing over correctness or scope.", "slug": "schema_bounded_blind_spot"}], "residual_id": "r:decision_procedure_boundary_mapping:b020_a04_c8", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b020_a04_c8", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Without boundary mapping, teams build procedures that loop, time out silently, overclaim certainty, misclassify edge cases, or hide human judgment behind a false promise of total computation. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Edge cases expose disagreement about what counts as correct, complete, or in-scope.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Edge cases expose disagreement about what counts as correct, complete, or in-scope.", "Without boundary mapping, teams build procedures that loop, time out silently, overclaim certainty, misclassify edge cases, or hide human judgment behind a false promise of total computation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "I tested an ordinary interior case on which competent annotators agree. It belongs to the candidate's class interior, not the constitutive boundary zone, and cannot defeat the edge-case correctness branch.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Label Ambiguity", "one_liner": "Diagnose a headline accuracy figure as a blend of two measurements — model capability in the class interior where annotators agree, and mere adjudication agreement in the boundary zone where reasonable experts split — by stratifying metrics on the inter-annotator agreement rate.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:label_ambiguity", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "label_ambiguity"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "label_ambiguity", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P026-C12-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact structural signature expressly separates the class interior from boundary cases where reasonable experts split. The split is over which categorical label is correct, satisfying the correctness branch directly."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Edge cases expose disagreement about what counts as correct, complete, or in-scope.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [8], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A decision problem can be decidable over its original full domain and need no narrowing, witness, resource bound, or predicate change.", "slug": "decidability_computability"}], "residual_id": "r:decision_procedure_boundary_mapping:b020_a04_c9", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b020_a04_c9", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Decision procedures gain legitimacy from termination and correctness, but real-world questions often blur their input domain, predicate, and evidence boundary. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The question may be decidable after narrowing the domain, bounding resources, adding witnesses, or changing the predicate.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [9], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The question may be decidable after narrowing the domain, bounding resources, adding witnesses, or changing the predicate.", "Decision procedures gain legitimacy from termination and correctness, but real-world questions often blur their input domain, predicate, and evidence boundary."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A decision problem can be decidable over its original full domain and need no narrowing, witness, resource bound, or predicate change.", "slug": "decidability_computability"}], "normalized_requirement": "The question may be decidable after narrowing the domain, bounding resources, adding witnesses, or changing the predicate.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The question may be decidable after narrowing the domain, bounding resources, adding witnesses, or changing the predicate.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [9], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The cost of wrong certainty is higher than the cost of explicitly declaring undecidable, infeasible, out-of-scope, or fallback cases.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The actual question may be underspecified, depend on unbounded future information, require solving an undecidable class, lack a finite observation boundary, or be decidable only in theory but infeasible in practice. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The cost of wrong certainty is higher than the cost of explicitly declaring undecidable, infeasible, out-of-scope, or fallback cases. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The cost of wrong certainty is higher than the cost of explicitly declaring undecidable, infeasible, out-of-scope, or fallback cases.", "The actual question may be underspecified, depend on unbounded future information, require solving an undecidable class, lack a finite observation boundary, or be decidable only in theory but infeasible in practice."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The cost of wrong certainty is higher than the cost of explicitly declaring undecidable, infeasible, out-of-scope, or fallback cases."}, {"display_text": "A contract, policy, API, model, or governance process must specify what it can and cannot decide.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system, organization, contract, policy, or model treats an open yes/no judgment as if it can always be answered by an algorithm or procedure. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: A contract, policy, API, model, or governance process must specify what it can and cannot decide. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A contract, policy, API, model, or governance process must specify what it can and cannot decide.", "A system, organization, contract, policy, or model treats an open yes/no judgment as if it can always be answered by an algorithm or procedure."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "A contract, policy, API, model, or governance process must specify what it can and cannot decide."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 20, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-020", "ledger_sha256": "2c76bd49d32c5e09a63f9c0dbbd7c00102d31034b390a82226859edc9a7b4a6f"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Decision Rights Clarification", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:decision_rights_clarification", "slug": "decision_rights_clarification"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 2, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 1, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a mismatch between responsibility, authority, participation, and accountability. A system may say that a team is responsible for an outcome while withholding decision authority. Or it may give multiple actors partial authority without clarifying who has final say. Or it may rely on informal influence paths that everyone knows but nobody records.\n\nWhen this mismatch persists, the organization develops defensive behavior. People escalate routine choices, seek informal pre-approval, avoid ownership, or blame others for decisions that were structurally ambiguous. The cost appears as delay, rework, conflict, inconsistent decisions, and weak accountability.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "People are unsure who can decide, approve, override, veto, consult, or escalate a recurring category of decisions, causing delay, conflict, duplicated work, shadow authority, or accountability gaps."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P026-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O9"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve work or an operational process as the context generating the decision requirement.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Work is the activity that requires decisions.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve necessity rather than merely the occurrence or usefulness of decisions.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The work requires the decisions.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve repeated decision instances rather than one exceptional choice.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The required decisions recur.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve more than one affected role, team, unit, stakeholder, or risk domain.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The decisions affect multiple targets of the selected type.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires effects spanning multiple roles.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Multiple roles are affected.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires effects spanning multiple teams.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "Multiple teams are affected.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires effects spanning multiple organizational or operational units.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "Multiple units are affected.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires effects spanning multiple stakeholders.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "Multiple stakeholders are affected.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires effects spanning multiple risk domains.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "Multiple risk domains are affected.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Work requires recurring decisions that affect multiple roles, teams, units, stakeholders, or risk domains.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Work requires recurring decisions that affect multiple targets of a listed type.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P026-C13-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A decision can be one-off and affect only one actor or domain.", "slug": "decision"}], "residual_id": "r:decision_rights_clarification:b020_a05_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b020_a05_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "People are unsure who can decide, approve, override, veto, consult, or escalate a recurring category of decisions, causing delay, conflict, duplicated work, shadow authority, or accountability gaps. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Work requires recurring decisions that affect multiple roles, teams, units, stakeholders, or risk domains.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Work requires recurring decisions that affect multiple roles, teams, units, stakeholders, or risk domains.", "People are unsure who can decide, approve, override, veto, consult, or escalate a recurring category of decisions, causing delay, conflict, duplicated work, shadow authority, or accountability gaps."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "I tested a static one-team plan with objectives fixed once. It lacks periodic re-aiming across parallel sections and is not the incident-objectives arrangement defined by the exact record.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Incident Objectives", "one_liner": "The short ordered list of specific, measurable, owned, time-bounded aims an Incident Commander sets each operational period, re-aiming the response periodically under uncertainty and driving the planning cycle's assignments, tactics, and period-end verification.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:incident_objectives", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "incident_objectives"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "incident_objectives", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P026-C13-U1", "why_it_fits": "Periodic re-aiming is constitutive, not incidental: each operational period requires newly set objectives, and the common objective list coordinates multiple parallel response sections."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "I tested a one-off community contribution with no continuing governance decisions. The exact record explicitly excludes it, so it cannot defeat the recurring multi-role branch.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Collaborative Maintenance", "one_liner": "Keep a shared knowledge artifact current through an open community working under five documented-and-exercised governance pathways — proposal, review, dispute resolution, deprecation, and attribution — rather than a single custodian.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:collaborative_maintenance", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "collaborative_maintenance"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "collaborative_maintenance", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P026-C13-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record makes ongoing co-stewardship and exercised decision pathways constitutive and names several distinct affected governance roles; the multiple-role branch is therefore universally necessary."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Work requires recurring decisions that affect multiple roles, teams, units, stakeholders, or risk domains.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P026-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve organizational actors or decision makers as the affected parties.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "People are the actors exhibiting the behavior.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require ambiguity in formal decision authority rather than a clear but disliked allocation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Formal authority is unclear.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve recurring or customary behavior rather than a one-off episode.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The behavior occurs routinely.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the because-relation from authority ambiguity to the selected behavior.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Unclear formal authority causes the behavior.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires routine permission-seeking.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "People ask for permission.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires approval-seeking outside the formal visible channel.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "People seek backchannel approval.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires postponement or nonexercise of decision making.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "People defer decisions.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "People routinely ask for permission, seek backchannel approval, or defer decisions because formal authority is unclear.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Because formal authority is unclear, people routinely exhibit a listed permission or deferral behavior.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P026-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Delegation under uncertainty can define a clear envelope and does not entail permission-seeking caused by ambiguity.", "slug": "authority_delegation_under_uncertainty"}], "residual_id": "r:decision_rights_clarification:b020_a05_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b020_a05_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when decisions stall or become political because authority is unclear. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: People routinely ask for permission, seek backchannel approval, or defer decisions because formal authority is unclear.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["People routinely ask for permission, seek backchannel approval, or defer decisions because formal authority is unclear.", "Use this archetype when decisions stall or become political because authority is unclear."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Delegation under uncertainty can define a clear envelope and does not entail permission-seeking caused by ambiguity.", "slug": "authority_delegation_under_uncertainty"}], "normalized_requirement": "People routinely ask for permission, seek backchannel approval, or defer decisions because formal authority is unclear.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "People routinely ask for permission, seek backchannel approval, or defer decisions because formal authority is unclear.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P026-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a formal source of organizational roles or rules rather than informal custom alone.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A formal organizational artifact is the specification source.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve category-level decision scope rather than ownership of work in general.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Specific decision categories are the objects needing ownership specification.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the person or role owning the decision category.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A decision owner is the role that should be identified.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require omission or absence of ownership specification.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The artifact does not specify who owns the decision categories.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires formal titles to fail to specify category-level ownership.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Formal titles are the artifact that omits ownership.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires an org chart to fail to specify category-level ownership.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "An organization chart is the artifact that omits ownership.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires formal policy to fail to specify category-level ownership.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "Policies are the artifact that omit ownership.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Formal titles, org charts, or policies do not specify who owns specific decision categories.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A listed formal organizational artifact fails to specify who owns specific decision categories.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P026-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Delegation explicitly identifies the delegatee and scope, the opposite of omitted ownership.", "slug": "delegation_of_authority"}], "residual_id": "r:decision_rights_clarification:b020_a05_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b020_a05_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "People are unsure who can decide, approve, override, veto, consult, or escalate a recurring category of decisions, causing delay, conflict, duplicated work, shadow authority, or accountability gaps. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Formal titles, org charts, or policies do not specify who owns specific decision categories.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Formal titles, org charts, or policies do not specify who owns specific decision categories.", "People are unsure who can decide, approve, override, veto, consult, or escalate a recurring category of decisions, causing delay, conflict, duplicated work, shadow authority, or accountability gaps."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Delegation explicitly identifies the delegatee and scope, the opposite of omitted ownership.", "slug": "delegation_of_authority"}], "normalized_requirement": "Formal titles, org charts, or policies do not specify who owns specific decision categories.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Formal titles, org charts, or policies do not specify who owns specific decision categories.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P027-C01", "dnf": [], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [], "predicate": "Decision delay, duplicate approvals, conflicting approvals, or after-the-fact overrides are recurring rather than exceptional.", "resolution": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RESIDUAL", "semantic_scope": "NON_ABSTRACTION", "structural_head": "A listed decision-approval dysfunction recurs rather than occurring exceptionally.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P027-C01-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Dispute resolution can settle exceptional disputes and need not involve recurrent approval-path dysfunction.", "slug": "adjudication_dispute_resolution"}], "residual_id": "r:decision_rights_clarification:b020_a05_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b020_a05_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "People are unsure who can decide, approve, override, veto, consult, or escalate a recurring category of decisions, causing delay, conflict, duplicated work, shadow authority, or accountability gaps. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Decision delay, duplicate approvals, conflicting approvals, or after-the-fact overrides are recurring rather than exceptional.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Decision delay, duplicate approvals, conflicting approvals, or after-the-fact overrides are recurring rather than exceptional.", "People are unsure who can decide, approve, override, veto, consult, or escalate a recurring category of decisions, causing delay, conflict, duplicated work, shadow authority, or accountability gaps."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RECLASSIFIED", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 1, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Dispute resolution can settle exceptional disputes and need not involve recurrent approval-path dysfunction.", "slug": "adjudication_dispute_resolution"}], "normalized_requirement": "Decision delay, duplicate approvals, conflicting approvals, or after-the-fact overrides are recurring rather than exceptional.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RECLASSIFIED", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later candidate-blind atomization classified this remainder as a threshold, parameter, materiality test, or other non-abstraction rather than a catalog gap."}, "predicate": "Decision delay, duplicate approvals, conflicting approvals, or after-the-fact overrides are recurring rather than exceptional.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P027-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a setting that structures authority, not an isolated interpersonal disagreement.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An organizational or governance setting is the causal context.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must make the overlapping objects authority boundaries rather than generic roles or tasks.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Authority boundaries are the affected objects.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail the setting-to-overlap causal direction, not mere coexistence.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The setting creates the boundary overlap.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require overlapping jurisdiction or authority, not merely multiple nonoverlapping authorities.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The authority boundaries overlap.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a matrix organizational setting.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The causal context is a matrix setting.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a cross-functional setting.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The causal context is a cross-functional setting.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires regulation to characterize the setting in which authority boundaries overlap.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The causal context is a regulated setting.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires multiple agencies as the organizational setting.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The causal context is a multi-agency setting.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "A matrix, cross-functional, regulated, or multi-agency setting creates overlapping authority boundaries.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A listed organizational setting causes authority boundaries to overlap.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P027-C02-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Separated powers can have explicitly nonoverlapping jurisdictions and do not require a matrix or multi-agency authority collision.", "slug": "separation_of_powers"}], "residual_id": "r:decision_rights_clarification:b020_a05_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b020_a05_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful in matrix organizations, cross-functional programs, public agencies, shared governance bodies, regulated operations, platform teams, crisis response, and partnerships where authority crosses role or unit boundaries. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A matrix, cross-functional, regulated, or multi-agency setting creates overlapping authority boundaries.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A matrix, cross-functional, regulated, or multi-agency setting creates overlapping authority boundaries.", "It is especially useful in matrix organizations, cross-functional programs, public agencies, shared governance bodies, regulated operations, platform teams, crisis response, and partnerships where authority crosses role or unit boundaries."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A unity-of-command breakdown caused by an ad hoc dual assignment outside a matrix organization defeats the unguarded edge; the matrix dual-reporting guard excludes that instance and leaves no frozen obligation false.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Unity-of-Command Breakdown", "one_liner": "The command-and-control failure in which one subordinate node in the authority graph carries two or more binding in-edges for the same task at the same time, so that when the supervisors' orders diverge the actor cannot comply with both.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:unity_of_command_breakdown", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1", "O3", "O5"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "binding_authority_edges_arise_from_matrix_dual_reporting", "predicate": "The converging binding authority edges arise from dual reporting lines in a matrix organization.", "rationale": "The retained qualifier is one atomic, candidate-anchored contingent fact selecting an exact-record manifestation; the candidate supplies the structural spine, and the qualifier neither restates the source head nor introduces an unrelated role or relation."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "unity_of_command_breakdown"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "binding_authority_edges_arise_from_matrix_dual_reporting"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "unity_of_command_breakdown", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P027-C02-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact candidate necessarily supplies overlapping binding authority, but not its organizational origin. The single matrix-dual-reporting qualifier selects an expressly named candidate manifestation and supplies the causal matrix branch without introducing another role or relation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A matrix, cross-functional, regulated, or multi-agency setting creates overlapping authority boundaries.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires delegated scope, named delegatee, retained accountability, and explicit limits on the decision class or threshold.", "role_mapping": "Delegated/localized authority -> delegatee; listed constraints -> scope and limits.", "slug": "delegation_of_authority", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b020_a05_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The design problem is to make authority clear enough for action while bounded enough for legitimacy, accountability, and risk control. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Authority needs to be delegated or localized, but only within explicit risk, cost, policy, safety, or strategic constraints.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Authority needs to be delegated or localized, but only within explicit risk, cost, policy, safety, or strategic constraints.", "The design problem is to make authority clear enough for action while bounded enough for legitimacy, accountability, and risk control."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Delegation of Authority", "one_liner": "Assign responsibility.", "page_ref": "prime:delegation_of_authority", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Delegated/localized authority -> delegatee; listed constraints -> scope and limits.", "slug": "delegation_of_authority", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires delegated scope, named delegatee, retained accountability, and explicit limits on the decision class or threshold."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Authority needs to be delegated or localized, but only within explicit risk, cost, policy, safety, or strategic constraints.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Decision consequences are large enough that accountability, auditability, or legitimacy matter.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The design problem is to make authority clear enough for action while bounded enough for legitimacy, accountability, and risk control. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Decision consequences are large enough that accountability, auditability, or legitimacy matter. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Decision consequences are large enough that accountability, auditability, or legitimacy matter.", "The design problem is to make authority clear enough for action while bounded enough for legitimacy, accountability, and risk control."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Decision consequences are large enough that accountability, auditability, or legitimacy matter."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 20, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-020", "ledger_sha256": "2c76bd49d32c5e09a63f9c0dbbd7c00102d31034b390a82226859edc9a7b4a6f"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Decision-Tempo Decoupling", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:decision_tempo_decoupling", "slug": "decision_tempo_decoupling"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 4 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A slower or more constrained actor is drawn into a repeated response game set by a faster actor’s tempo. Each quick response consumes attention, triggers coordination overhead, bypasses verification, reveals preference, or commits resources. Because the faster actor can create new stimuli sooner than the slower actor can complete high-quality orientation, the slower actor’s cycle becomes reactive. Attempts to “just speed up” often deepen the trap: deliberation is skipped, local autonomy is suppressed by central panic, false signals are rewarded, resource reserves are consumed, and the faster actor learns that tempo pressure works.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A slower or more constrained actor is drawn into a repeated response game set by a faster actor’s tempo. Each quick response consumes attention, triggers coordination overhead, bypasses verification, reveals preference, or commits resources. Because the faster actor can create new stimuli sooner than the slower actor can complete high-quality orientation, the slower actor’s cycle becomes reactive. Attempts to “just speed up” often deepen the trap: deliberation is skipped, local autonomy is suppressed by central panic, false signals are rewarded, resource reserves are consumed, and the faster actor learns that tempo pressure works."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a tempo asymmetry in which a faster actor moves before a slower actor can complete its sense-decide-act cycle.", "role_mapping": "Fast creator -> advantaged actor; slower interpretation/response -> subordinated decision cycle.", "slug": "decision_cycle_subordination", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b020_a06_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The actor must be responsive enough not to be bypassed, but independent enough not to let the faster actor define every decision frame and deadline. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: One actor can create events, signals, deadlines, offers, attacks, releases, or narratives faster than another actor can interpret and respond well.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["One actor can create events, signals, deadlines, offers, attacks, releases, or narratives faster than another actor can interpret and respond well.", "The actor must be responsive enough not to be bypassed, but independent enough not to let the faster actor define every decision frame and deadline."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Decision Cycle Subordination", "one_liner": "A slower actor's decision cycle becomes forced to respond to a faster actor's tempo, and responding faster deepens the subordination rather than escaping it.", "page_ref": "prime:decision_cycle_subordination", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Fast creator -> advantaged actor; slower interpretation/response -> subordinated decision cycle.", "slug": "decision_cycle_subordination", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a tempo asymmetry in which a faster actor moves before a slower actor can complete its sense-decide-act cycle."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "One actor can create events, signals, deadlines, offers, attacks, releases, or narratives faster than another actor can interpret and respond well.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A slower cycle can be caused by avoidable inefficiency and need not contain any listed legitimate requirement.", "slug": "decision_cycle_subordination"}], "residual_id": "r:decision_tempo_decoupling:b020_a06_c2", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b020_a06_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A slower or more constrained actor is drawn into a repeated response game set by a faster actor’s tempo. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The slower actor’s approval, coordination, verification, legal, ethical, coalition, or safety requirements are real constraints rather than mere inefficiencies.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The slower actor’s approval, coordination, verification, legal, ethical, coalition, or safety requirements are real constraints rather than mere inefficiencies.", "A slower or more constrained actor is drawn into a repeated response game set by a faster actor’s tempo."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A slower cycle can be caused by avoidable inefficiency and need not contain any listed legitimate requirement.", "slug": "decision_cycle_subordination"}], "normalized_requirement": "The slower actor’s approval, coordination, verification, legal, ethical, coalition, or safety requirements are real constraints rather than mere inefficiencies.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The slower actor’s approval, coordination, verification, legal, ethical, coalition, or safety requirements are real constraints rather than mere inefficiencies.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P027-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a responder rather than an unrelated process.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An actor responds to stimuli.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the each-stimulus response pattern, not one isolated response.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The actor responds stimulus by stimulus, to each stimulus.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail response-to-dependency causality, not mere correlation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The responding creates dependency.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require creation of an additional dependency rather than persistence of an existing one.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The dependency created is new.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Responding to each stimulus creates new dependency.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Stimulus-by-stimulus responding creates new dependency.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P027-C03-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P027-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the responding actor.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An actor responds to stimuli.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the repeated each-stimulus response pattern.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The actor responds stimulus by stimulus, to each stimulus.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve commitments attributable to the responder, not unrelated information.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Commitments of the responding actor are the disclosed objects.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail disclosure through responding, not only commitment formation.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The responding reveals those commitments.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Responding to each stimulus reveals commitments.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Stimulus-by-stimulus responding reveals the responder's commitments.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P027-C03-U2"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P027-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the responding actor.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An actor responds to stimuli.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the each-stimulus response pattern.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The actor responds stimulus by stimulus, to each stimulus.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must make attention, not a generic resource, the object of depletion.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The responder's attention is the depleted resource.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail actual response-caused depletion, not only a risk of distraction.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The responding depletes attention.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Responding to each stimulus depletes attention.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Stimulus-by-stimulus responding depletes the responder's attention.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P027-C03-U3"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P027-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the actor whose stimulus-by-stimulus responses enable the transfer.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A responding actor answers the stimuli.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the repeated each-stimulus response pattern.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The actor responds stimulus by stimulus, to each stimulus.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a second actor with the relative tempo advantage.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A distinct faster actor is the beneficiary of the response pattern.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the relative tempo comparison, not simply an agenda setter.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The agenda-setting actor is faster than the responding actor.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail that the response pattern enables agenda choice by the faster actor.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The responding lets the faster actor choose the agenda.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Responding to each stimulus lets the faster actor choose the agenda.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Stimulus-by-stimulus responding cedes agenda choice to the faster actor.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P027-C03-U4"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime requires reaction to deepen tempo subordination but not every listed dependency, disclosure, attention, or agenda mechanism.", "slug": "decision_cycle_subordination"}], "residual_id": "r:decision_tempo_decoupling:b020_a06_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b020_a06_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Because the faster actor can create new stimuli sooner than the slower actor can complete high-quality orientation, the slower actor’s cycle becomes reactive. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Responding to each stimulus creates new dependency, reveals commitments, depletes attention, or lets the faster actor choose the agenda.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Responding to each stimulus creates new dependency, reveals commitments, depletes attention, or lets the faster actor choose the agenda.", "Because the faster actor can create new stimuli sooner than the slower actor can complete high-quality orientation, the slower actor’s cycle becomes reactive."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PARTIALLY_DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A freely chosen defensive response would not cede agenda choice, but the exact candidate excludes it by requiring every response to be necessitated by the faster opponent's preceding move.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Initiative Loss", "one_liner": "The failure mode in which an actor's decision cycle becomes structurally subordinated to an opponent's tempo, so every move is a forced reaction — a trap that faster reacting only deepens, recoverable only by changing the move-space.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:initiative_loss", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "initiative_loss"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "initiative_loss", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P027-C03-U4", "why_it_fits": "Every complete initiative-loss instance requires a response-forced actor whose moves are dictated by a distinct faster opponent, ceding cadence and framing. That directly entails the full agenda-choice branch."}], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 4, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 1, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 3}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime requires reaction to deepen tempo subordination but not every listed dependency, disclosure, attention, or agenda mechanism.", "slug": "decision_cycle_subordination"}], "normalized_requirement": "Responding to each stimulus creates new dependency, reveals commitments, depletes attention, or lets the faster actor choose the agenda.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "PARTIAL_EXISTING_DSA_GROUNDING", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation grounded 1 of 4 eligible atomic units; the remaining unit or units stayed open."}, "predicate": "Responding to each stimulus creates new dependency, reveals commitments, depletes attention, or lets the faster actor choose the agenda.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P027-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the environment or operating context as the source of both penalties.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An environment imposes the response consequences.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail an adverse consequence for delayed response.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The environment punishes delay.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail an adverse consequence for excessive or premature response.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The environment punishes overreaction.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the dual-sided penalty; one directional failure is insufficient.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Both delay and overreaction are punished.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the tradeoff between response speed and response quality.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The affected decision object is the ordinary speed-versus-quality tradeoff.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail that the two penalties destabilize the ordinary tradeoff.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The dual punishment makes the tradeoff unstable.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve instability, not merely difficulty in selecting one point on a stable tradeoff.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The speed-versus-quality tradeoff becomes unstable.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "The environment punishes both delay and overreaction, making ordinary speed-versus-quality tradeoffs unstable.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An environment's punishment of both delay and overreaction destabilizes the ordinary speed-versus-quality tradeoff.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P027-C04-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Tempo mismatch can have a single directional failure and need not punish both delay and overreaction.", "slug": "tempo_mismatch"}], "residual_id": "r:decision_tempo_decoupling:b020_a06_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b020_a06_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The environment punishes both delay and overreaction, making ordinary speed-versus-quality tradeoffs unstable. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The environment punishes both delay and overreaction, making ordinary speed-versus-quality tradeoffs unstable."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Tempo mismatch can have a single directional failure and need not punish both delay and overreaction.", "slug": "tempo_mismatch"}], "normalized_requirement": "The environment punishes both delay and overreaction, making ordinary speed-versus-quality tradeoffs unstable.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The environment punishes both delay and overreaction, making ordinary speed-versus-quality tradeoffs unstable.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "There are predictable classes of stimuli that can be preauthorized, ignored, batched, delayed, automated, or delegated without losing strategic intent.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: There are predictable classes of stimuli that can be preauthorized, ignored, batched, delayed, automated, or delegated without losing strategic intent. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["There are predictable classes of stimuli that can be preauthorized, ignored, batched, delayed, automated, or delegated without losing strategic intent."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "There are predictable classes of stimuli that can be preauthorized, ignored, batched, delayed, automated, or delegated without losing strategic intent."}, {"display_text": "The actor can create at least some buffers, independent observation channels, reset points, or local action envelopes.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The actor must be responsive enough not to be bypassed, but independent enough not to let the faster actor define every decision frame and deadline. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: The actor can create at least some buffers, independent observation channels, reset points, or local action envelopes. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The actor can create at least some buffers, independent observation channels, reset points, or local action envelopes.", "The actor must be responsive enough not to be bypassed, but independent enough not to let the faster actor define every decision frame and deadline."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The actor can create at least some buffers, independent observation channels, reset points, or local action envelopes."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 20, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-020", "ledger_sha256": "2c76bd49d32c5e09a63f9c0dbbd7c00102d31034b390a82226859edc9a7b4a6f"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Decisive-Point Concentration", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:decisive_point_concentration", "slug": "decisive_point_concentration"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A scarce divisible resource is spread across too many competing fronts, tasks, audiences, hazards, or opportunities. Each point receives enough attention to consume capacity but not enough to cross the threshold that would change the result. The system preserves apparent fairness or coverage while failing to create any local superiority where the outcome is actually decided.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A scarce divisible resource is spread across too many competing fronts, tasks, audiences, hazards, or opportunities. Each point receives enough attention to consume capacity but not enough to cross the threshold that would change the result. The system preserves apparent fairness or coverage while failing to create any local superiority where the outcome is actually decided."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a finite resource budget that cannot fully fund all efforts and therefore under-resources non-decisive ones deliberately.", "role_mapping": "Total resource -> finite budget; all fronts -> allocation set; insufficient -> economy constraint.", "slug": "economy_of_force", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b020_a07_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A scarce divisible resource is spread across too many competing fronts, tasks, audiences, hazards, or opportunities. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The total resource is insufficient to fully support all fronts, priorities, or claimants.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The total resource is insufficient to fully support all fronts, priorities, or claimants.", "A scarce divisible resource is spread across too many competing fronts, tasks, audiences, hazards, or opportunities."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Economy Of Force", "one_liner": "Deliberate minimum-sufficient under-resourcing of non-decisive efforts so that mass can be concentrated at the decisive point.", "page_ref": "prime:economy_of_force", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Total resource -> finite budget; all fronts -> allocation set; insufficient -> economy constraint.", "slug": "economy_of_force", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a finite resource budget that cannot fully fund all efforts and therefore under-resources non-decisive ones deliberately."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The total resource is insufficient to fully support all fronts, priorities, or claimants.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a decisive point on a threshold or convex response curve where concentrated resource produces nonlinear payoff.", "role_mapping": "Point -> decisive location; response -> threshold/convex curve.", "slug": "mass", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b020_a07_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Each point receives enough attention to consume capacity but not enough to cross the threshold that would change the result. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: At least one point has a nonlinear, thresholded, time-sensitive, or strategically pivotal response curve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["At least one point has a nonlinear, thresholded, time-sensitive, or strategically pivotal response curve.", "Each point receives enough attention to consume capacity but not enough to cross the threshold that would change the result."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Mass", "one_liner": "Concentrating finite resource on a single decisive point against a nonlinear response curve, rather than spreading the same resource thinly across all points.", "page_ref": "prime:mass", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Point -> decisive location; response -> threshold/convex curve.", "slug": "mass", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a decisive point on a threshold or convex response curve where concentrated resource produces nonlinear payoff."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "At least one point has a nonlinear, thresholded, time-sensitive, or strategically pivotal response curve.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime contrasts massing enough resource to cross one decisive threshold with spreading the same finite pool too thinly across all points.", "role_mapping": "Even allocation -> thin spread; every point below threshold -> failure of dilution.", "slug": "mass", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b020_a07_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Each point receives enough attention to consume capacity but not enough to cross the threshold that would change the result. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Even allocation would keep every point below the effective threshold.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Even allocation would keep every point below the effective threshold.", "Each point receives enough attention to consume capacity but not enough to cross the threshold that would change the result."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Mass", "one_liner": "Concentrating finite resource on a single decisive point against a nonlinear response curve, rather than spreading the same resource thinly across all points.", "page_ref": "prime:mass", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Even allocation -> thin spread; every point below threshold -> failure of dilution.", "slug": "mass", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime contrasts massing enough resource to cross one decisive threshold with spreading the same finite pool too thinly across all points."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Even allocation would keep every point below the effective threshold.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a minimum-viable threshold for non-decisive efforts so resource can be freed without losing them outright.", "role_mapping": "Non-decisive areas -> supporting efforts; minimum floor -> minimum-sufficient allocation.", "slug": "economy_of_force", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b020_a07_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Some non-decisive areas can be held at a minimum floor without unacceptable harm. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Some non-decisive areas can be held at a minimum floor without unacceptable harm."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Economy Of Force", "one_liner": "Deliberate minimum-sufficient under-resourcing of non-decisive efforts so that mass can be concentrated at the decisive point.", "page_ref": "prime:economy_of_force", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Non-decisive areas -> supporting efforts; minimum floor -> minimum-sufficient allocation.", "slug": "economy_of_force", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a minimum-viable threshold for non-decisive efforts so resource can be freed without losing them outright."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Some non-decisive areas can be held at a minimum floor without unacceptable harm.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The organization can reassign, synchronize, or protect the relevant resource for a bounded window.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: The organization can reassign, synchronize, or protect the relevant resource for a bounded window. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The organization can reassign, synchronize, or protect the relevant resource for a bounded window."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The organization can reassign, synchronize, or protect the relevant resource for a bounded window."}, {"display_text": "The opportunity cost of weakness elsewhere can be made explicit and governed.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The opportunity cost of weakness elsewhere can be made explicit and governed. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The opportunity cost of weakness elsewhere can be made explicit and governed."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The opportunity cost of weakness elsewhere can be made explicit and governed."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 20, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-020", "ledger_sha256": "2c76bd49d32c5e09a63f9c0dbbd7c00102d31034b390a82226859edc9a7b4a6f"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Declared Effect Boundary Enforcement", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:declared_effect_boundary_enforcement", "slug": "declared_effect_boundary_enforcement"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 2, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "An action presents a narrower declared interface than its real causal footprint, changing shared state, dependencies, permissions, logs, caches, queues, downstream workflows, or stakeholder conditions in ways callers did not agree to or anticipate.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "An action presents a narrower declared interface than its real causal footprint, changing shared state, dependencies, permissions, logs, caches, queues, downstream workflows, or stakeholder conditions in ways callers did not agree to or anticipate."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P027-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an operation that performs the access.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An operation is the accessing actor.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve state, not a stateless value or unrelated resource, as the access object.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "State is the object accessed by the operation.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail read access with this direction, not merely the other access mode.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The operation reads the state.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires state with global scope.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The accessed state is global.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires state that persists beyond the immediate operation.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The accessed state is persistent.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires cached state.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The accessed state is cached.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires state shared across callers, operations, or actors.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The accessed state is shared.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires state located in a downstream component or workflow.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The accessed state is downstream.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Operations read global, persistent, cached, shared, or downstream state.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An operation reads state in one listed category.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P027-C05-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P027-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an operation that performs the access.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An operation is the accessing actor.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve state, not a stateless value or unrelated resource, as the access object.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "State is the object accessed by the operation.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail write access with this direction, not merely the other access mode.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The operation writes the state.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires state with global scope.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The accessed state is global.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires state that persists beyond the immediate operation.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The accessed state is persistent.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires cached state.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The accessed state is cached.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires state shared across callers, operations, or actors.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The accessed state is shared.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires state located in a downstream component or workflow.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The accessed state is downstream.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Operations write global, persistent, cached, shared, or downstream state.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An operation writes state in one listed category.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P027-C05-U2"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Containment can isolate a local hazard without any operation reading or writing shared state.", "slug": "containment"}], "residual_id": "r:declared_effect_boundary_enforcement:b020_a08_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b020_a08_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "An action presents a narrower declared interface than its real causal footprint, changing shared state, dependencies, permissions, logs, caches, queues, downstream workflows, or stakeholder conditions in ways callers did not agree to or anticipate. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Operations read or write global, persistent, cached, shared, or downstream state.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Operations read or write global, persistent, cached, shared, or downstream state.", "An action presents a narrower declared interface than its real causal footprint, changing shared state, dependencies, permissions, logs, caches, queues, downstream workflows, or stakeholder conditions in ways callers did not agree to or anticipate."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "If no operation ever reads the conditional field when it is meaningful, the field is dead state rather than the exact temporary-field relation between a specific operation and conditionally valid object state.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Temporary Field", "one_liner": "The code smell in which an object carries an instance variable meaningful only during one operation or state yet visible as permanent structural state everywhere — a mismatch between the field's structural scope (every instance) and its validity scope (the subset where it holds a real value).", "page_ref": "domain_specific:temporary_field", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "temporary_field"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "temporary_field", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P027-C05-U1", "why_it_fits": "A temporary field is structurally permanent object state that is meaningful to a particular operation or state. Its meaningful use necessarily includes an operation reading that persistent field, satisfying the persistent-state branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A pure record with no getters could avoid the read operation, but the exact candidate expressly requires getter-and-setter exposure; removing getter access defeats that identity.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Data Class", "one_liner": "Flag an object-oriented class that holds fields with getters and setters but no domain methods as a symptom that its behavior migrated outward into consumers, then resolve the verdict with one role question — should this class enforce its own invariants?", "page_ref": "domain_specific:data_class", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "data_class"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "data_class", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P027-C05-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact identity includes stored object fields exposed through getters. A getter is an operation that reads persistent object state, so the persistent-state DNF branch is universally entailed."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A community could announce governance without inspecting the artifact, but the exact candidate requires the five pathways to be exercised against the shared artifact, excluding that paper-only arrangement.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Collaborative Maintenance", "one_liner": "Keep a shared knowledge artifact current through an open community working under five documented-and-exercised governance pathways — proposal, review, dispute resolution, deprecation, and attribution — rather than a single custodian.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:collaborative_maintenance", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "collaborative_maintenance"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "collaborative_maintenance", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P027-C05-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact arrangement actually exercises proposal, review, deprecation, and provenance pathways over one community-maintained artifact. Those operations necessarily inspect shared maintained state, satisfying the shared-state branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "An engine that never changes an environment, stack, heap, program counter, or equivalent maintained state cannot perform the exact repeated fetch-decode-act execution loop.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Interpreter", "one_liner": "Execute a program directly from its source or intermediate form by looping fetch-decode-act over one unit at a time against maintained runtime state, producing no standalone binary — so the engine must be present at every run and pays a per-instruction dispatch cost.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:interpreter", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "interpreter"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "interpreter", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P027-C05-U2", "why_it_fits": "The fetch-decode-act loop necessarily maintains and mutates an environment, stack, heap, or equivalent runtime state across dispatch units. This directly entails an operation writing persistent state."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A local variable can be written transiently without persistent state, but relocating the value locally removes the structural-scope versus validity-scope mismatch and is therefore not a temporary-field instance.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Temporary Field", "one_liner": "The code smell in which an object carries an instance variable meaningful only during one operation or state yet visible as permanent structural state everywhere — a mismatch between the field's structural scope (every instance) and its validity scope (the subset where it holds a real value).", "page_ref": "domain_specific:temporary_field", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "temporary_field"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "temporary_field", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P027-C05-U2", "why_it_fits": "The exact smell requires a conditional instance variable to be populated during the operation or state in which it is meaningful while remaining structurally permanent. That population is an operation writing persistent object state."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "An immutable value object could omit all setters, but the exact data-class smell here includes getter-and-setter exposure; removing the setter defeats the candidate identity.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Data Class", "one_liner": "Flag an object-oriented class that holds fields with getters and setters but no domain methods as a symptom that its behavior migrated outward into consumers, then resolve the verdict with one role question — should this class enforce its own invariants?", "page_ref": "domain_specific:data_class", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "data_class"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "data_class", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P027-C05-U2", "why_it_fits": "The exact identity includes persistent object fields exposed through setters. A setter is an operation that writes persistent object state, so the persistent-state branch is directly entailed."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A discussion-only community that never applies changes would not keep the artifact current or exercise the change and deprecation pathways, so it is excluded from the exact candidate.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Collaborative Maintenance", "one_liner": "Keep a shared knowledge artifact current through an open community working under five documented-and-exercised governance pathways — proposal, review, dispute resolution, deprecation, and attribution — rather than a single custodian.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:collaborative_maintenance", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "collaborative_maintenance"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "collaborative_maintenance", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P027-C05-U2", "why_it_fits": "Collaborative maintenance actually exercises governed change and deprecation pathways on a shared artifact. Applying an approved change necessarily writes shared state, satisfying the shared-state branch."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Operations read or write global, persistent, cached, shared, or downstream state.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P027-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6", "O9"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6", "O10"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve callers or users who hold the low-impact interpretation.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Callers are the actors assigning the interpretation.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the same focal action across the apparent property and mutation capability.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "One action is the object the callers interpret.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail caller attribution of the property, not merely that the action actually has it.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The callers treat the action as having one listed low-impact property.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve mutation capability; actual mutation is not required by the source.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The action can mutate resources.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve shared resources rather than only private local state.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Shared resources are the possible mutation targets.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the but-contrast between appearance and capability.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The caller's low-impact interpretation conflicts with the action's shared-resource mutation capability.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires an informational or read-only interpretation.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The callers treat the action as informational.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a local-scope interpretation.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The callers treat the action as local.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a reversibility interpretation.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "The callers treat the action as reversible.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a harmlessness interpretation.", "obligation_id": "O10", "statement": "The callers treat the action as harmless.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Callers treat an action as informational, local, reversible, or harmless, but it can mutate shared resources.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Callers assign an action a listed low-impact interpretation although the action can mutate shared resources.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P027-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A side effect can be documented and expected, so callers need not mistake the action as informational, local, reversible, or harmless.", "slug": "side_effect"}], "residual_id": "r:declared_effect_boundary_enforcement:b020_a08_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b020_a08_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "An action presents a narrower declared interface than its real causal footprint, changing shared state, dependencies, permissions, logs, caches, queues, downstream workflows, or stakeholder conditions in ways callers did not agree to or anticipate. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Callers treat an action as informational, local, reversible, or harmless, but it can mutate shared resources.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Callers treat an action as informational, local, reversible, or harmless, but it can mutate shared resources.", "An action presents a narrower declared interface than its real causal footprint, changing shared state, dependencies, permissions, logs, caches, queues, downstream workflows, or stakeholder conditions in ways callers did not agree to or anticipate."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A single-threaded stack-layout heisenbug defeats an unguarded shared-resource claim; the guard selects the exact race or shared-memory manifestation where observation perturbs shared scheduler or memory state.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Heisenbug", "one_liner": "Name the software defect whose failure vanishes under observation because attaching a debugger, adding a print, or disabling optimization perturbs the timing window or interleaving it rides on — so disappearance-under-observation is the diagnostic tell, not evidence the bug is gone.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:heisenbug", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O5"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "observation_perturbation_acts_on_shared_scheduler_or_memory_state", "predicate": "The observation-induced perturbation acts on shared scheduler or memory state.", "rationale": "The retained qualifier is one atomic, candidate-anchored contingent fact selecting an exact-record manifestation; the candidate supplies the structural spine, and the qualifier neither restates the source head nor introduces an unrelated role or relation."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "heisenbug"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "observation_perturbation_acts_on_shared_scheduler_or_memory_state"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "heisenbug", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P027-C06-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact candidate supplies an apparently informational observation action that can alter execution conditions. One target-type qualifier restricts the already-present perturbation to an expressly named shared scheduler or shared-memory manifestation, completing the informational branch."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Callers treat an action as informational, local, reversible, or harmless, but it can mutate shared resources.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P027-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O9"], ["O1", "O2", "O10"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a change in state, not generic information or control flow, as the propagated object.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A state change is the object being propagated.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail propagation through the channel, not merely channel existence.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The state change passes through an effect channel.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The dependency branch must preserve implicitness; this modifier is not required in any other channel branch.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The dependency effect channel is implicit.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a dependency channel together with its branch-specific implicitness.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The effect channel is a dependency.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a callback channel; the source does not require that callback to be implicit.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The effect channel is a callback.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires an observer channel; the source does not require that observer to be implicit.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The effect channel is an observer.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a trigger channel; the source does not require that trigger to be implicit.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The effect channel is a trigger.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires an event-handler channel; the source does not require that handler to be implicit.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The effect channel is an event handler.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a logging-system channel; the source does not require that system to be implicit.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "The effect channel is a logging system.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires an informal-workaround channel; no additional implicitness modifier is imposed.", "obligation_id": "O10", "statement": "The effect channel is an informal workaround.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "State changes pass through implicit dependencies, callbacks, observers, triggers, event handlers, logging systems, or informal workarounds.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A state change passes through one listed effect channel.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P027-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A callback can be explicit, local, and pure, and need not propagate shared-state mutation.", "slug": "callback"}], "residual_id": "r:declared_effect_boundary_enforcement:b020_a08_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b020_a08_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "An action presents a narrower declared interface than its real causal footprint, changing shared state, dependencies, permissions, logs, caches, queues, downstream workflows, or stakeholder conditions in ways callers did not agree to or anticipate. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: State changes pass through implicit dependencies, callbacks, observers, triggers, event handlers, logging systems, or informal workarounds.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["State changes pass through implicit dependencies, callbacks, observers, triggers, event handlers, logging systems, or informal workarounds.", "An action presents a narrower declared interface than its real causal footprint, changing shared state, dependencies, permissions, logs, caches, queues, downstream workflows, or stakeholder conditions in ways callers did not agree to or anticipate."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A callback can be explicit, local, and pure, and need not propagate shared-state mutation.", "slug": "callback"}], "normalized_requirement": "State changes pass through implicit dependencies, callbacks, observers, triggers, event handlers, logging systems, or informal workarounds.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "State changes pass through implicit dependencies, callbacks, observers, triggers, event handlers, logging systems, or informal workarounds.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P027-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the action that causes the later or nonlocal failure.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An action is the causal source.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a failure, not merely risk, as the outcome.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A failure is the caused outcome.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail actual action-to-failure causality.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The action causes the failure.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve substantial separation in operational, system, causal, or temporal locus, not mere adjacency.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The failure arises far from the causal action.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail that the nonlocal separation causes difficulty in assigning responsibility.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The separation makes assigning responsibility difficult.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve actual difficulty in assigning responsibility, not merely added effort with no impairment.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "Assigning responsibility is difficult.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Failures arise far from the action that caused them, making responsibility difficult.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A failure's distance from its causal action makes assigning responsibility difficult.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P027-C08-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P027-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the action that causes the later or nonlocal failure.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An action is the causal source.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a failure, not merely risk, as the outcome.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A failure is the caused outcome.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail actual action-to-failure causality.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The action causes the failure.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve substantial separation in operational, system, causal, or temporal locus, not mere adjacency.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The failure arises far from the causal action.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail that the nonlocal separation causes difficulty in repairing the failure.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The separation makes repairing the failure difficult.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve actual difficulty in repairing the failure, not merely added effort with no impairment.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "Repairing the failure is difficult.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Failures arise far from the action that caused them, making repair difficult.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A failure's distance from its causal action makes repairing the failure difficult.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P027-C08-U2"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Risk can migrate to another location while remaining causally visible and easy to assign.", "slug": "risk_migration"}], "residual_id": "r:declared_effect_boundary_enforcement:b020_a08_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b020_a08_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Failures arise far from the action that caused them, making responsibility and repair difficult. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Failures arise far from the action that caused them, making responsibility and repair difficult."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 2, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 2}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Risk can migrate to another location while remaining causally visible and easy to assign.", "slug": "risk_migration"}], "normalized_requirement": "Failures arise far from the action that caused them, making responsibility and repair difficult.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 2 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Failures arise far from the action that caused them, making responsibility and repair difficult.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A system needs local reasoning, testability, auditability, repeatability, or permission control across an interface boundary.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Useful actions often need to affect the world, but local reasoning depends on being able to trust the declared boundary of those effects. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: A system needs local reasoning, testability, auditability, repeatability, or permission control across an interface boundary. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A system needs local reasoning, testability, auditability, repeatability, or permission control across an interface boundary.", "Useful actions often need to affect the world, but local reasoning depends on being able to trust the declared boundary of those effects."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "A system needs local reasoning, testability, auditability, repeatability, or permission control across an interface boundary."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 20, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-020", "ledger_sha256": "2c76bd49d32c5e09a63f9c0dbbd7c00102d31034b390a82226859edc9a7b4a6f"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Decoupling via Interface", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:decoupling_via_interface", "slug": "decoupling_via_interface"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 1 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 1}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Direct coupling exposes system parts to one another's internal structure, assumptions, volatility, or implementation details, allowing changes and failures to propagate too easily.", "explanation_source": {"field": "diagnostic_head", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Direct coupling exposes system parts to one another's internal structure, assumptions, volatility, or implementation details, allowing changes and failures to propagate too easily."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "This branch preserves the complete remedy-free diagnostic route; goals, feasibility clauses, gates, deployment constraints, and supporting context remain outside the DNF."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "EXT001-C033", "dnf": [["EXT001-U033-O1"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"obligation_id": "EXT001-U033-O1", "predicate": "Direct interaction allows changes, failures, assumptions, or implementation details to propagate across the connection."}], "predicate": "Direct interaction allows changes, failures, assumptions, or implementation details to propagate across the connection.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Direct interaction allows changes, failures, assumptions, or implementation details to propagate across the connection.", "unit_id": "EXT001-U033"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"catalog_exhaustion": "CONDITION_LEVEL", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Direct interaction allows changes, failures, assumptions, or implementation details to propagate across the connection.", "slug": "crossover_interaction"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Direct interaction allows changes, failures, assumptions, or implementation details to propagate across the connection.", "slug": "message_passing"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Direct interaction allows changes, failures, assumptions, or implementation details to propagate across the connection.", "slug": "frame_problem"}], "residual_id": "EXT001:decoupling_via_interface:C01", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding."}}, "condition_id": "ext001_decoupling_via_interface_a01", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored essence_one_line, compression_statement, components fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: Direct interaction allows changes, failures, assumptions, or implementation details to propagate across the connection.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Direct interaction allows changes, failures, assumptions, or implementation details to propagate across the connection."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Direct interaction allows changes, failures, assumptions, or implementation details to propagate across the connection.", "slug": "crossover_interaction"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Direct interaction allows changes, failures, assumptions, or implementation details to propagate across the connection.", "slug": "message_passing"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Direct interaction allows changes, failures, assumptions, or implementation details to propagate across the connection.", "slug": "frame_problem"}], "normalized_requirement": "Direct interaction allows changes, failures, assumptions, or implementation details to propagate across the connection.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Direct interaction allows changes, failures, assumptions, or implementation details to propagate across the connection.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A stable interaction contract can be stated without exposing all internal structure.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored essence_one_line, compression_statement, components fields; the source file was not modified. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: A stable interaction contract can be stated without exposing all internal structure. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A stable interaction contract can be stated without exposing all internal structure.", "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored essence_one_line, compression_statement, components fields; the source file was not modified."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "A stable interaction contract can be stated without exposing all internal structure."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"candidate_ledger_sha256": "96f72d2139077fd57bf795048ebef33b3fd574b20963170080ec916b5b3b92fe", "extension_id": "new-archetypes-extension-001", "ledger_id": "prime-production-v1.2-extension-001", "ledger_sha256": "9644520614744632d1d36da44b1acd77ce432852c6083eb871203521c166efce"}, "base_projection_sha256": "841e0c7f3cb8e8054475ad29a8a14745a416b4fc115559a44878b94292e673ec", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "ca09ed9fe1598ce7072755b530de5553f5ee0a7cd64ae82d9e4a4e2149a37788", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Deductive Chain Validation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:deductive_chain_validation", "slug": "deductive_chain_validation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 2, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A conclusion can acquire the aura of certainty because it sounds deductive. The danger is that the certainty may be borrowed from the *form* of rule-based reasoning even when the chain itself is broken. A premise may be false, a definition may shift, an exception may apply, or the conclusion may be broader than the rule supports.\n\nThe recurring structural problem is hidden inferential debt: the decision depends on a chain that has not been made inspectable enough to validate.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A conclusion is treated as certain because it appears logical, but one or more rules, premises, definitions, exceptions, or inference steps may not actually support that conclusion."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P027-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O9"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a rule-like source rather than an informal preference or descriptive fact.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A formal or normative source supplies the justification.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an action, not a purely descriptive theorem, as the justificatory endpoint.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "An action is the object being justified.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail actual justificatory use, not merely source applicability.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The source is being used to justify the action.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a rule as the justificatory source.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The source is a rule.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a policy as the justificatory source.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The source is a policy.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a law as the justificatory source.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The source is a law.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a diagnostic criterion as the justificatory source.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The source is a diagnostic criterion.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a technical specification as the justificatory source.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The source is a technical specification.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a formal requirement as the justificatory source.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "The source is a formal requirement.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "A rule, policy, law, diagnostic criterion, technical specification, or formal requirement is being used to justify action.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A listed formal or normative source is used to justify action.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P027-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Deductive reasoning can establish a purely descriptive theorem with no rule, policy, or action use.", "slug": "deductive_reasoning"}], "residual_id": "r:deductive_chain_validation:b020_a09_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b020_a09_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when a rule, policy, law, standard, diagnostic criterion, software rule, or formal requirement is being used to justify a decision. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A rule, policy, law, diagnostic criterion, technical specification, or formal requirement is being used to justify action.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A rule, policy, law, diagnostic criterion, technical specification, or formal requirement is being used to justify action.", "Use this archetype when a rule, policy, law, standard, diagnostic criterion, software rule, or formal requirement is being used to justify a decision."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A descriptive fallacy-of-accident conclusion defeats the unguarded edge; the action-prescription guard excludes it, and the candidate's rule application then necessarily functions as the action's justification.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Fallacy of Accident", "one_liner": "The inferential mistake of applying a general rule mechanically to a case that satisfies its terms but lies outside its intended scope — treating a defeasible generalisation, carrying an implicit ceteris paribus clause, as an exceptionless universal.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:fallacy_of_accident", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1", "O2", "O3"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "spurious_conclusion_prescribes_action", "predicate": "The spurious conclusion prescribes an action.", "rationale": "The retained qualifier is one atomic, candidate-anchored contingent fact selecting an exact-record manifestation; the candidate supplies the structural spine, and the qualifier neither restates the source head nor introduces an unrelated role or relation."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "fallacy_of_accident"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "spurious_conclusion_prescribes_action"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "fallacy_of_accident", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P027-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact candidate supplies the rule-application justificatory spine but can end in a descriptive conclusion. One atomic endpoint-type qualifier restricts its existing spurious conclusion to an action prescription, completing the rule branch without adding a second fact."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A rule, policy, law, diagnostic criterion, technical specification, or formal requirement is being used to justify action.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P027-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a conclusion, not an unrelated assertion or action, as the certainty-bearing object.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A conclusion is the focal claim.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve asserted certainty rather than tentative or probabilistic expression.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The conclusion is expressed with certainty.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the but-contrast between certainty and opacity.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The certainty contrasts with missing visibility into its reasoning support.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires absence of visible premises.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The premises supporting the conclusion are not visible.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires absence of a visible inference path.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The inference path supporting the conclusion is not visible.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "The conclusion is expressed with certainty, but the premises or inference path are not visible.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A conclusion is expressed with certainty while either its premises or its inference path is not visible.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P027-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid deduction can expose every premise and inference step.", "slug": "deductive_reasoning"}], "residual_id": "r:deductive_chain_validation:b020_a09_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b020_a09_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Deduction can justify strong certainty, but only when the rule is applicable, terms are stable, premises are true, inference steps are valid, and the conclusion is no broader than what the chain supports. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The conclusion is expressed with certainty, but the premises or inference path are not visible.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The conclusion is expressed with certainty, but the premises or inference path are not visible.", "Deduction can justify strong certainty, but only when the rule is applicable, terms are stable, premises are true, inference steps are valid, and the conclusion is no broader than what the chain supports."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid deduction can expose every premise and inference step.", "slug": "deductive_reasoning"}], "normalized_requirement": "The conclusion is expressed with certainty, but the premises or inference path are not visible.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The conclusion is expressed with certainty, but the premises or inference path are not visible.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P027-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require more than one actor, not a solitary reasoner.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Multiple actors are affected.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve one conclusion, not generic information, as the object on which the actors rely.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A conclusion is the shared reliance object.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail reliance by the multiple actors on the same conclusion.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The actors rely on the conclusion.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve mandatory reliance rather than optional consultation.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The reliance is required.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "Multiple actors must rely on the conclusion.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Multiple actors are required to rely on one conclusion.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P027-C11-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P027-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require more than one actor, not a solitary reasoner.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Multiple actors are affected.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve reasoning that supports the conclusion, not an unrelated process or artifact.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The conclusion's supporting reasoning is the re-check object.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve reasoning verification or reconstruction by the affected actors.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The actors would re-check that reasoning.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve inability to re-check safely, not mere inconvenience or optional nonperformance.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The actors cannot perform the re-check safely.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve full from-scratch reasoning reconstruction as the safely unavailable activity.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The unavailable safe re-check would reconstruct the reasoning from scratch.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Multiple actors cannot safely re-check the conclusion's reasoning from scratch.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Multiple actors cannot safely reconstruct a conclusion's reasoning from scratch.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P027-C11-U2"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Validation can be performed by one actor and need not support shared reliance on a conclusion.", "slug": "validation"}], "residual_id": "r:deductive_chain_validation:b020_a09_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b020_a09_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Multiple actors must rely on the conclusion and cannot safely re-check the reasoning from scratch. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Multiple actors must rely on the conclusion and cannot safely re-check the reasoning from scratch."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PARTIALLY_DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A private optional significance calculation would not require multi-actor reliance, but it is excluded by the exact candidate's institutional enforcement through researchers, reviewers, and journals.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Null Ritual", "one_liner": "The institutionalised practice of mechanically executing a null hypothesis significance test — nil-null, p-value, p < .05 verdict — severed from the alternatives, priors, effect sizes, and decision context inference requires, yet retaining full editorial authority as if it had not been.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:null_ritual", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "null_ritual"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "null_ritual", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P027-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact candidate is institutional rather than private: researchers perform the binary procedure because reviewers and journals require it, and its verdict retains editorial and social authority. Multiple actors are therefore required to rely on the same conclusion."}], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 2, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 1, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Validation can be performed by one actor and need not support shared reliance on a conclusion.", "slug": "validation"}], "normalized_requirement": "Multiple actors must rely on the conclusion and cannot safely re-check the reasoning from scratch.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "PARTIAL_EXISTING_DSA_GROUNDING", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation grounded 1 of 2 eligible atomic units; the remaining unit or units stayed open."}, "predicate": "Multiple actors must rely on the conclusion and cannot safely re-check the reasoning from scratch.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P027-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a system, workflow, or rule engine capable of carrying decisions or inferences.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A decision-propagation substrate is the propagating actor.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve invalid inference content, not generic error or valid reasoning.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "An invalid inference is the propagated object.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve propagation capability or possibility; actual propagation is not required.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The substrate may propagate the invalid inference.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve propagation as the modal relation rather than mere possible storage or generation.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The possible effect is propagation of the inference through the substrate's operation.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve broad repeated or population-level reach, not one confined case.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The possible propagation is at scale.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a decision system.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The substrate is a decision system.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a workflow.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The substrate is a workflow.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires an automated rule engine.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The substrate is an automated rule engine.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "A decision system, workflow, or automated rule engine may propagate an invalid inference at scale.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A listed decision-propagation substrate can propagate an invalid inference at scale.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P027-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Deductive reasoning can be valid, manual, and confined to one case rather than propagating an invalid inference.", "slug": "deductive_reasoning"}], "residual_id": "r:deductive_chain_validation:b020_a09_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b020_a09_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially valuable when the conclusion will be reused by others, embedded in a workflow, automated in a rule engine, or treated as authoritative. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A decision system, workflow, or automated rule engine may propagate an invalid inference at scale.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A decision system, workflow, or automated rule engine may propagate an invalid inference at scale.", "It is especially valuable when the conclusion will be reused by others, embedded in a workflow, automated in a rule engine, or treated as authoritative."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A private one-off malformed test would not propagate at scale, but it is not the institutionally enforced publication workflow defined by the exact null-ritual record.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Null Ritual", "one_liner": "The institutionalised practice of mechanically executing a null hypothesis significance test — nil-null, p-value, p < .05 verdict — severed from the alternatives, priors, effect sizes, and decision context inference requires, yet retaining full editorial authority as if it had not been.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:null_ritual", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "null_ritual"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "null_ritual", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P027-C12-U1", "why_it_fits": "The null ritual is an institutionally repeated publication workflow that can disseminate a detached, invalid bright-line inference throughout a research field. The source is modal, so this propagation capability directly satisfies the workflow branch."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A decision system, workflow, or automated rule engine may propagate an invalid inference at scale.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 20, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-020", "ledger_sha256": "2c76bd49d32c5e09a63f9c0dbbd7c00102d31034b390a82226859edc9a7b4a6f"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Defensible Boundary Retreat", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:defensible_boundary_retreat", "slug": "defensible_boundary_retreat"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 6, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 5, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "6 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system, community, asset, project, policy, or strategic position remains committed to a location, configuration, market, architecture, promise, or front line whose hold cost is rising faster than its value. Delay preserves the appearance of continuity but consumes resources, narrows the option set, increases exposure, and may convert a voluntary transition into forced displacement, disorderly collapse, stranded assets, or coercive lock-in.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system, community, asset, project, policy, or strategic position remains committed to a location, configuration, market, architecture, promise, or front line whose hold cost is rising faster than its value. Delay preserves the appearance of continuity but consumes resources, narrows the option set, increases exposure, and may convert a voluntary transition into forced displacement, disorderly collapse, stranded assets, or coercive lock-in."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires rising integrated defense cost to cross above the value of continuing to hold the position.", "role_mapping": "Listed burden -> defense-cost trajectory; holding value -> threshold comparison.", "slug": "managed_retreat", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b020_a10_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system, community, asset, project, policy, or strategic position remains committed to a location, configuration, market, architecture, promise, or front line whose hold cost is rising faster than its value. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Exposure, maintenance burden, hazard probability, defense cost, opportunity cost, or legitimacy cost rises faster than the value of holding the current position.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Exposure, maintenance burden, hazard probability, defense cost, opportunity cost, or legitimacy cost rises faster than the value of holding the current position.", "A system, community, asset, project, policy, or strategic position remains committed to a location, configuration, market, architecture, promise, or front line whose hold cost is rising faster than its value."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Managed Retreat", "one_liner": "Withdrawing deliberately and in advance to a defensible boundary when the cost of holding a position rises past its value, before forced displacement closes the option.", "page_ref": "prime:managed_retreat", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Listed burden -> defense-cost trajectory; holding value -> threshold comparison.", "slug": "managed_retreat", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires rising integrated defense cost to cross above the value of continuing to hold the position."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Exposure, maintenance burden, hazard probability, defense cost, opportunity cost, or legitimacy cost rises faster than the value of holding the current position.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a deliberately selected defensible new boundary and a sequenced, supported transition before forced displacement.", "role_mapping": "Safer boundary -> selected line; lead time/support -> managed withdrawal.", "slug": "managed_retreat", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b020_a10_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Holding a deteriorating position can feel loyal, brave, efficient, or politically safer in the short term, while early retreat can preserve long-term value and agency but requires acknowledging loss before collapse makes the case undeniable. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A safer or more defensible boundary exists, but moving to it requires lead time, coordination, compensation, migration, redesign, or social legitimacy.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A safer or more defensible boundary exists, but moving to it requires lead time, coordination, compensation, migration, redesign, or social legitimacy.", "Holding a deteriorating position can feel loyal, brave, efficient, or politically safer in the short term, while early retreat can preserve long-term value and agency but requires acknowledging loss before collapse makes the case undeniable."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Managed Retreat", "one_liner": "Withdrawing deliberately and in advance to a defensible boundary when the cost of holding a position rises past its value, before forced displacement closes the option.", "page_ref": "prime:managed_retreat", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Safer boundary -> selected line; lead time/support -> managed withdrawal.", "slug": "managed_retreat", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a deliberately selected defensible new boundary and a sequenced, supported transition before forced displacement."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A safer or more defensible boundary exists, but moving to it requires lead time, coordination, compensation, migration, redesign, or social legitimacy.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime is the temporal threshold at which reversal cost overtakes continuation and the system enters a committed state.", "role_mapping": "Approaching point -> horizon; expensive/impossible retreat -> post-threshold commitment.", "slug": "reversibility_horizon", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime requires a closing voluntary-withdrawal window after which retreat becomes forced abandonment.", "role_mapping": "Orderly retreat -> voluntary option; certain point -> closing window.", "slug": "managed_retreat", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b020_a10_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Holding a deteriorating position can feel loyal, brave, efficient, or politically safer in the short term, while early retreat can preserve long-term value and agency but requires acknowledging loss before collapse makes the case undeniable. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The reversibility horizon is approaching: after a certain point, continued holding will make orderly retreat much more expensive or impossible.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The reversibility horizon is approaching: after a certain point, continued holding will make orderly retreat much more expensive or impossible.", "Holding a deteriorating position can feel loyal, brave, efficient, or politically safer in the short term, while early retreat can preserve long-term value and agency but requires acknowledging loss before collapse makes the case undeniable."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Reversibility Horizon", "one_liner": "Temporal threshold where reversal cost exceeds forward commitment.", "page_ref": "prime:reversibility_horizon", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Approaching point -> horizon; expensive/impossible retreat -> post-threshold commitment.", "slug": "reversibility_horizon", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime is the temporal threshold at which reversal cost overtakes continuation and the system enters a committed state."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Managed Retreat", "one_liner": "Withdrawing deliberately and in advance to a defensible boundary when the cost of holding a position rises past its value, before forced displacement closes the option.", "page_ref": "prime:managed_retreat", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Orderly retreat -> voluntary option; certain point -> closing window.", "slug": "managed_retreat", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a closing voluntary-withdrawal window after which retreat becomes forced abandonment."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The reversibility horizon is approaching: after a certain point, continued holding will make orderly retreat much more expensive or impossible.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires prior irreversible expenditure to bias continued commitment despite worse prospective returns, satisfying the sunk-cost alternative.", "role_mapping": "Resistance -> escalation; sunk cost -> irrecoverable prior investment.", "slug": "sunk_cost_and_irreversible_commitment", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b020_a10_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system, community, asset, project, policy, or strategic position remains committed to a location, configuration, market, architecture, promise, or front line whose hold cost is rising faster than its value. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Stakeholders resist retreat because of sunk cost, identity, political optics, promises already made, fear of loss, or uncertainty about the receiving boundary.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders resist retreat because of sunk cost, identity, political optics, promises already made, fear of loss, or uncertainty about the receiving boundary.", "A system, community, asset, project, policy, or strategic position remains committed to a location, configuration, market, architecture, promise, or front line whose hold cost is rising faster than its value."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Sunk Cost and Irreversible Commitment", "one_liner": "Expended resources create psychological barriers to reversal.", "page_ref": "prime:sunk_cost_and_irreversible_commitment", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Resistance -> escalation; sunk cost -> irrecoverable prior investment.", "slug": "sunk_cost_and_irreversible_commitment", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires prior irreversible expenditure to bias continued commitment despite worse prospective returns, satisfying the sunk-cost alternative."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Stakeholders resist retreat because of sunk cost, identity, political optics, promises already made, fear of loss, or uncertainty about the receiving boundary.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires voluntary prior sequenced withdrawal with transition support, contrasted with forced rout or abandonment after the window.", "role_mapping": "Staged withdrawal -> sequenced retreat; preserved value -> prior action benefit.", "slug": "managed_retreat", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b020_a10_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Holding a deteriorating position can feel loyal, brave, efficient, or politically safer in the short term, while early retreat can preserve long-term value and agency but requires acknowledging loss before collapse makes the case undeniable. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Staged withdrawal, salvage, transfer, or relocation can preserve more value than emergency evacuation, collapse, indefinite subsidy, or reactive abandonment.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Staged withdrawal, salvage, transfer, or relocation can preserve more value than emergency evacuation, collapse, indefinite subsidy, or reactive abandonment.", "Holding a deteriorating position can feel loyal, brave, efficient, or politically safer in the short term, while early retreat can preserve long-term value and agency but requires acknowledging loss before collapse makes the case undeniable."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Managed Retreat", "one_liner": "Withdrawing deliberately and in advance to a defensible boundary when the cost of holding a position rises past its value, before forced displacement closes the option.", "page_ref": "prime:managed_retreat", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Staged withdrawal -> sequenced retreat; preserved value -> prior action benefit.", "slug": "managed_retreat", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires voluntary prior sequenced withdrawal with transition support, contrasted with forced rout or abandonment after the window."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Staged withdrawal, salvage, transfer, or relocation can preserve more value than emergency evacuation, collapse, indefinite subsidy, or reactive abandonment.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P027-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a retreat decision rather than generic coordination.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A retreat decision is the focal decision.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve required coordination, not optional consultation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The retreat decision must coordinate across domains.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve cross-domain coordination rather than activity contained within one domain.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The coordination crosses domain boundaries.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require more than one affected domain; one listed domain alone is insufficient.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Multiple domains must be coordinated.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the broader infrastructure, human, contractual, ecological, knowledge, data, institutional, or security-perimeter domain family; the examples are illustrative.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The coordinated domains are socio-technical domains of the listed kinds.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "A retreat decision must coordinate across infrastructure, people, contracts, ecological systems, knowledge, data, institutions, or security perimeters.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A retreat decision requires coordination across multiple socio-technical domains.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P027-C13-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A simple retreat can move one asset or position without coordinating across any listed domains.", "slug": "managed_retreat"}], "residual_id": "r:defensible_boundary_retreat:b020_a10_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b020_a10_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A retreat decision must coordinate across infrastructure, people, contracts, ecological systems, knowledge, data, institutions, or security perimeters. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A retreat decision must coordinate across infrastructure, people, contracts, ecological systems, knowledge, data, institutions, or security perimeters."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Uncoordinated individual flight could lack cross-domain coordination, but the exact candidate excludes it by requiring a coordinated maneuver over finite egress and reception systems.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Evacuation", "one_liner": "The coordinated removal of people or high-value assets from a zone an incoming hazard will sweep, staged under time pressure over a finite egress network — the structural dual of containment (leave the hazard, move the protected).", "page_ref": "domain_specific:evacuation", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "evacuation"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "evacuation", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P027-C13-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every complete evacuation includes a trigger or withdrawal decision whose feasibility depends on coordinating a protected set with finite egress infrastructure, reception capacity, information, and security or accountability systems. It is a subtype-preserving retreat decision with multiple listed socio-technical domains."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A retreat decision must coordinate across infrastructure, people, contracts, ecological systems, knowledge, data, institutions, or security perimeters.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 20, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-020", "ledger_sha256": "2c76bd49d32c5e09a63f9c0dbbd7c00102d31034b390a82226859edc9a7b4a6f"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Defensible Foothold Expansion", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:defensible_foothold_expansion", "slug": "defensible_foothold_expansion"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 5, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Broad simultaneous entry disperses scarce resources across many contexts. The intervention becomes shallow: no segment receives a complete solution, delivery teams accumulate exceptions, evidence is noisy, support is fragmented, and every new case begins from zero. Even when isolated successes occur, they do not compound because their conditions and reusable assets are not captured.\n\nThe opposite failure is permanent niche entrapment. A narrow position can become comfortable and profitable while the organization loses the ability or incentive to pursue the larger target. The archetype therefore requires both a disciplined first boundary and an explicit expansion horizon.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "The intended territory is much larger than the actor’s present resources, credibility, distribution, operating capacity, or knowledge. Attempting to address the whole system at once produces shallow coverage: no segment receives complete value, learning remains noisy, support becomes fragmented, competitors or inertia erase gains, and there is no durable base from which to compound. The missing structure is a deliberately bounded first position that can be won, held, and converted into leverage for later expansion."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime begins with a large target territory that immediate resources cannot take as a whole.", "role_mapping": "Ultimate target -> large territory; current capacity shortfall -> broad attack infeasible.", "slug": "beachhead_market", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b020_a11_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use Defensible Foothold Expansion when the desired territory is strategically important but too large for current resources, credibility, distribution, operating capacity, or knowledge. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The ultimate target is strategically important but too broad for current capacity, legitimacy, or distribution.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The ultimate target is strategically important but too broad for current capacity, legitimacy, or distribution.", "Use Defensible Foothold Expansion when the desired territory is strategically important but too large for current resources, credibility, distribution, operating capacity, or knowledge."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Beachhead Market", "one_liner": "A narrow defensible foothold held to fund expansion into a larger territory.", "page_ref": "prime:beachhead_market", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Ultimate target -> large territory; current capacity shortfall -> broad attack infeasible.", "slug": "beachhead_market", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime begins with a large target territory that immediate resources cannot take as a whole."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The ultimate target is strategically important but too broad for current capacity, legitimacy, or distribution.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A foothold can be chosen for accessibility or a favorable force ratio without concentrated need or the ability to receive complete value.", "slug": "beachhead_market"}], "residual_id": "r:defensible_foothold_expansion:b020_a11_c2", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b020_a11_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when one bounded segment, geography, institutional unit, or use case has intense need and can support complete delivery, while later opportunities are functionally adjacent. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: At least one bounded segment, geography, unit, use case, or problem class has concentrated need and can receive complete value.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["At least one bounded segment, geography, unit, use case, or problem class has concentrated need and can receive complete value.", "It is especially useful when one bounded segment, geography, institutional unit, or use case has intense need and can support complete delivery, while later opportunities are functionally adjacent."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A foothold can be chosen for accessibility or a favorable force ratio without concentrated need or the ability to receive complete value.", "slug": "beachhead_market"}], "normalized_requirement": "At least one bounded segment, geography, unit, use case, or problem class has concentrated need and can receive complete value.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "At least one bounded segment, geography, unit, use case, or problem class has concentrated need and can receive complete value.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires the foothold to be dominated, held, and defended through consolidation before breakout.", "role_mapping": "Initial position -> foothold; defended advantage -> local dominance and consolidation.", "slug": "beachhead_market", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b020_a11_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The initial position can plausibly be defended through fit, trust, integration, capability, access, or another legitimate advantage. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The initial position can plausibly be defended through fit, trust, integration, capability, access, or another legitimate advantage."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Beachhead Market", "one_liner": "A narrow defensible foothold held to fund expansion into a larger territory.", "page_ref": "prime:beachhead_market", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Initial position -> foothold; defended advantage -> local dominance and consolidation.", "slug": "beachhead_market", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires the foothold to be dominated, held, and defended through consolidation before breakout."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The initial position can plausibly be defended through fit, trust, integration, capability, access, or another legitimate advantage.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires consolidation to extract revenue, references, legitimacy, learning, or staging capability for the next move.", "role_mapping": "Generated assets -> converting capability; foothold -> consolidation source.", "slug": "beachhead_market", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b020_a11_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A foothold is intended to become a durable operating position. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The foothold can generate transferable learning, proof, relationships, operating assets, legitimacy, or resource surplus.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The foothold can generate transferable learning, proof, relationships, operating assets, legitimacy, or resource surplus.", "A foothold is intended to become a durable operating position."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Beachhead Market", "one_liner": "A narrow defensible foothold held to fund expansion into a larger territory.", "page_ref": "prime:beachhead_market", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Generated assets -> converting capability; foothold -> consolidation source.", "slug": "beachhead_market", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires consolidation to extract revenue, references, legitimacy, learning, or staging capability for the next move."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The foothold can generate transferable learning, proof, relationships, operating assets, legitimacy, or resource surplus.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The load-bearing converting adjacency requires wins in one foothold to reuse and convert into capability against the next segment.", "role_mapping": "Adjacent opportunity -> next segment; reuse -> capability conversion.", "slug": "beachhead_market", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b020_a11_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when one bounded segment, geography, institutional unit, or use case has intense need and can support complete delivery, while later opportunities are functionally adjacent. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: There are identifiable adjacent opportunities that reuse meaningful parts of the foothold rather than requiring a wholly new model.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["There are identifiable adjacent opportunities that reuse meaningful parts of the foothold rather than requiring a wholly new model.", "It is especially useful when one bounded segment, geography, institutional unit, or use case has intense need and can support complete delivery, while later opportunities are functionally adjacent."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Beachhead Market", "one_liner": "A narrow defensible foothold held to fund expansion into a larger territory.", "page_ref": "prime:beachhead_market", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Adjacent opportunity -> next segment; reuse -> capability conversion.", "slug": "beachhead_market", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The load-bearing converting adjacency requires wins in one foothold to reuse and convert into capability against the next segment."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "There are identifiable adjacent opportunities that reuse meaningful parts of the foothold rather than requiring a wholly new model.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a consolidation phase that protects the held base before resources are turned toward a staged breakout.", "role_mapping": "Protected base -> consolidated foothold; gated next step -> breakout phase.", "slug": "beachhead_market", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b020_a11_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It should remain valuable under ordinary conditions, produce assets that travel, and support a governed next step. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Expansion can be gated and the established base can be protected while the next step is attempted.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Expansion can be gated and the established base can be protected while the next step is attempted.", "It should remain valuable under ordinary conditions, produce assets that travel, and support a governed next step."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Beachhead Market", "one_liner": "A narrow defensible foothold held to fund expansion into a larger territory.", "page_ref": "prime:beachhead_market", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Protected base -> consolidated foothold; gated next step -> breakout phase.", "slug": "beachhead_market", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a consolidation phase that protects the held base before resources are turned toward a staged breakout."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Expansion can be gated and the established base can be protected while the next step is attempted.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 20, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-020", "ledger_sha256": "2c76bd49d32c5e09a63f9c0dbbd7c00102d31034b390a82226859edc9a7b4a6f"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Deferred Fulfillment Placeholder", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:deferred_fulfillment_placeholder", "slug": "deferred_fulfillment_placeholder"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 5, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 7 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 7}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system or process needs to refer to, pass around, schedule against, or depend on a value that is not yet available. Without a first-class placeholder, consumers either block prematurely, duplicate polling logic, confuse expectation with possession, lose accountability for who must fulfill the value, or allow downstream work to proceed as if fulfillment were guaranteed.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system or process needs to refer to, pass around, schedule against, or depend on a value that is not yet available. Without a first-class placeholder, consumers either block prematurely, duplicate polling logic, confuse expectation with possession, lose accountability for who must fulfill the value, or allow downstream work to proceed as if fulfillment were guaranteed."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A consumer can block and make no progress until the future resolves; continuations are available but not mandatory.", "slug": "future_or_promise"}], "residual_id": "r:deferred_fulfillment_placeholder:b020_a12_c1", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b020_a12_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Without a first-class placeholder, consumers either block prematurely, duplicate polling logic, confuse expectation with possession, lose accountability for who must fulfill the value, or allow downstream work to proceed as if fulfillment were guaranteed. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A producer can commit to supply a value later, but the consumer must make progress now.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A producer can commit to supply a value later, but the consumer must make progress now.", "Without a first-class placeholder, consumers either block prematurely, duplicate polling logic, confuse expectation with possession, lose accountability for who must fulfill the value, or allow downstream work to proceed as if fulfillment were guaranteed."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A consumer can block and make no progress until the future resolves; continuations are available but not mandatory.", "slug": "future_or_promise"}], "normalized_requirement": "A producer can commit to supply a value later, but the consumer must make progress now.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A producer can commit to supply a value later, but the consumer must make progress now.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime is a reified placeholder for a not-yet-existing value that can be named and reasoned about while pending.", "role_mapping": "Known slot -> placeholder identity; unknown content -> pending value.", "slug": "future_or_promise", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b020_a12_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A result, resource, approval, delivery, computation, or evidence item has a known future slot but unknown current content. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A result, resource, approval, delivery, computation, or evidence item has a known future slot but unknown current content."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Future Or Promise", "one_liner": "A first-class placeholder for a value committed to be supplied later.", "page_ref": "prime:future_or_promise", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Known slot -> placeholder identity; unknown content -> pending value.", "slug": "future_or_promise", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime is a reified placeholder for a not-yet-existing value that can be named and reasoned about while pending."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A result, resource, approval, delivery, computation, or evidence item has a known future slot but unknown current content.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires consumers to attach continuations or block awaiting resolution and provides a composition algebra over placeholders.", "role_mapping": "Dependent work -> consumer intent; continuations/waits -> attachment to future.", "slug": "future_or_promise", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b020_a12_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Without a first-class placeholder, consumers either block prematurely, duplicate polling logic, confuse expectation with possession, lose accountability for who must fulfill the value, or allow downstream work to proceed as if fulfillment were guaranteed. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Dependent work should attach continuations, waits, retries, fallbacks, or cancellation to the future value.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Dependent work should attach continuations, waits, retries, fallbacks, or cancellation to the future value.", "Without a first-class placeholder, consumers either block prematurely, duplicate polling logic, confuse expectation with possession, lose accountability for who must fulfill the value, or allow downstream work to proceed as if fulfillment were guaranteed."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Future Or Promise", "one_liner": "A first-class placeholder for a value committed to be supplied later.", "page_ref": "prime:future_or_promise", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Dependent work -> consumer intent; continuations/waits -> attachment to future.", "slug": "future_or_promise", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires consumers to attach continuations or block awaiting resolution and provides a composition algebra over placeholders."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Dependent work should attach continuations, waits, retries, fallbacks, or cancellation to the future value.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime makes the pending handle first-class, assigns one producer fulfillment authority, and exposes a pending-to-resolved lifecycle.", "role_mapping": "Identity -> reified handle; ownership -> producer authority; lifecycle -> once-only state machine.", "slug": "future_or_promise", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b020_a12_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The pending item needs identity, ownership, lifecycle state, or auditability before fulfillment. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The pending item needs identity, ownership, lifecycle state, or auditability before fulfillment."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Future Or Promise", "one_liner": "A first-class placeholder for a value committed to be supplied later.", "page_ref": "prime:future_or_promise", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Identity -> reified handle; ownership -> producer authority; lifecycle -> once-only state machine.", "slug": "future_or_promise", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime makes the pending handle first-class, assigns one producer fulfillment authority, and exposes a pending-to-resolved lifecycle."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The pending item needs identity, ownership, lifecycle state, or auditability before fulfillment.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A future can have exactly one consumer and therefore need not coordinate multiple dependents.", "slug": "future_or_promise"}], "residual_id": "r:deferred_fulfillment_placeholder:b020_a12_c5", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b020_a12_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Multiple dependents must observe the same eventual outcome rather than inventing separate waiting states. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Multiple dependents must observe the same eventual outcome rather than inventing separate waiting states."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A future can have exactly one consumer and therefore need not coordinate multiple dependents.", "slug": "future_or_promise"}], "normalized_requirement": "Multiple dependents must observe the same eventual outcome rather than inventing separate waiting states.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Multiple dependents must observe the same eventual outcome rather than inventing separate waiting states.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's once-only state machine explicitly distinguishes pending from rejection with a reason, satisfying the failure alternative.", "role_mapping": "Failure -> rejected state; continued pending -> distinct unresolved state.", "slug": "future_or_promise", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b020_a12_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Failure, timeout, cancellation, or partial fulfillment must be handled explicitly rather than being mistaken for continued pending status. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Failure, timeout, cancellation, or partial fulfillment must be handled explicitly rather than being mistaken for continued pending status."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Future Or Promise", "one_liner": "A first-class placeholder for a value committed to be supplied later.", "page_ref": "prime:future_or_promise", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Failure -> rejected state; continued pending -> distinct unresolved state.", "slug": "future_or_promise", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's once-only state machine explicitly distinguishes pending from rejection with a reason, satisfying the failure alternative."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Failure, timeout, cancellation, or partial fulfillment must be handled explicitly rather than being mistaken for continued pending status.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a passable handle while exactly one producer or protocol retains explicit settlement authority.", "role_mapping": "Passed placeholder -> first-class handle; no forged resolution -> single fulfillment authority.", "slug": "future_or_promise", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b020_a12_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Without a first-class placeholder, consumers either block prematurely, duplicate polling logic, confuse expectation with possession, lose accountability for who must fulfill the value, or allow downstream work to proceed as if fulfillment were guaranteed. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The placeholder must be passed across boundaries without leaking authority to forge or prematurely resolve it.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The placeholder must be passed across boundaries without leaking authority to forge or prematurely resolve it.", "Without a first-class placeholder, consumers either block prematurely, duplicate polling logic, confuse expectation with possession, lose accountability for who must fulfill the value, or allow downstream work to proceed as if fulfillment were guaranteed."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Future Or Promise", "one_liner": "A first-class placeholder for a value committed to be supplied later.", "page_ref": "prime:future_or_promise", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Passed placeholder -> first-class handle; no forged resolution -> single fulfillment authority.", "slug": "future_or_promise", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a passable handle while exactly one producer or protocol retains explicit settlement authority."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The placeholder must be passed across boundaries without leaking authority to forge or prematurely resolve it.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 20, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-020", "ledger_sha256": "2c76bd49d32c5e09a63f9c0dbbd7c00102d31034b390a82226859edc9a7b4a6f"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Definition-Time Context Binding", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:definition_time_context_binding", "slug": "definition_time_context_binding"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 7 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 7}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A behavior unit is defined under one set of bindings but later runs under another ambient context. Names, objects, definitions, schemas, identities, permissions, or configuration then resolve differently from what the author or delegator intended. The unit may appear portable while its semantics remain coupled to invisible origin assumptions or to whichever caller happens to invoke it.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A behavior unit is defined under one set of bindings but later runs under another ambient context. Names, objects, definitions, schemas, identities, permissions, or configuration then resolve differently from what the author or delegator intended. The unit may appear portable while its semantics remain coupled to invisible origin assumptions or to whichever caller happens to invoke it."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A captured behavior can cross a context boundary while its defining scope remains present and unchanged.", "slug": "portable_context_bundle"}], "residual_id": "r:definition_time_context_binding:b020_a13_c1", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b020_a13_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A callback, task, continuation, rule, script, model step, or delegated action is executed after its defining scope has changed or disappeared. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A callback, task, continuation, rule, script, model step, or delegated action is executed after its defining scope has changed or disappeared."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A captured behavior can cross a context boundary while its defining scope remains present and unchanged.", "slug": "portable_context_bundle"}], "normalized_requirement": "A callback, task, continuation, rule, script, model step, or delegated action is executed after its defining scope has changed or disappeared.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A callback, task, continuation, rule, script, model step, or delegated action is executed after its defining scope has changed or disappeared.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires portability of a behavior and its captured context across invocation boundaries.", "role_mapping": "Listed crossing -> context boundary; execution -> invocation.", "slug": "portable_context_bundle", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b020_a13_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Execution crosses threads, processes, machines, organizations, time periods, tenants, jurisdictions, or workflow stages. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Execution crosses threads, processes, machines, organizations, time periods, tenants, jurisdictions, or workflow stages."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Portable Context Bundle", "one_liner": "A behaviour-unit carries the context it was defined in, resolving against its definition-time environment rather than the ambient one at use.", "page_ref": "prime:portable_context_bundle", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Listed crossing -> context boundary; execution -> invocation.", "slug": "portable_context_bundle", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires portability of a behavior and its captured context across invocation boundaries."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Execution crosses threads, processes, machines, organizations, time periods, tenants, jurisdictions, or workflow stages.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a behavior-unit with free references whose bindings come from captured or ambient context.", "role_mapping": "Nonlocal names -> free references; listed state -> contextual bindings.", "slug": "portable_context_bundle", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b020_a13_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Names, objects, definitions, schemas, identities, permissions, or configuration then resolve differently from what the author or delegator intended. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The behavior refers to nonlocal names, mutable objects, configuration, identity, authority, schema, locale, clock, or policy definitions.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The behavior refers to nonlocal names, mutable objects, configuration, identity, authority, schema, locale, clock, or policy definitions.", "Names, objects, definitions, schemas, identities, permissions, or configuration then resolve differently from what the author or delegator intended."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Portable Context Bundle", "one_liner": "A behaviour-unit carries the context it was defined in, resolving against its definition-time environment rather than the ambient one at use.", "page_ref": "prime:portable_context_bundle", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Nonlocal names -> free references; listed state -> contextual bindings.", "slug": "portable_context_bundle", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a behavior-unit with free references whose bindings come from captured or ambient context."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The behavior refers to nonlocal names, mutable objects, configuration, identity, authority, schema, locale, clock, or policy definitions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P027-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must hold the behavior fixed rather than compare different operations.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The same behavior is compared across executions.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve outputs or results of the same behavior.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Results of the behavior are the varying outcomes.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail result variation with behavior held constant.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The same behavior produces different results across contexts.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve context-to-result dependence, not accidental variation.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The result difference depends on the execution context.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires caller identity or state to determine the result.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The changing context is the caller.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires worker identity or state to determine the result.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The changing context is the worker.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires host identity or state to determine the result.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The changing context is the host.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires ambient global state to determine the result.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The changing context is ambient global state.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "The same behavior produces different results depending on caller, worker, host, or ambient global state.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "The same behavior yields different results as one listed execution context changes.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P027-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A correctly captured bundle resolves against definition-time context and prevents ambient caller or host state from changing its result.", "slug": "portable_context_bundle"}], "residual_id": "r:definition_time_context_binding:b020_a13_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b020_a13_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A behavior unit is defined under one set of bindings but later runs under another ambient context. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The same behavior produces different results depending on caller, worker, host, or ambient global state.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The same behavior produces different results depending on caller, worker, host, or ambient global state.", "A behavior unit is defined under one set of bindings but later runs under another ambient context."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "If the code or input changes between failure and success, the source comparison may fail, but that is not the exact observer-conditional heisenbug, which holds program and input fixed.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Heisenbug", "one_liner": "Name the software defect whose failure vanishes under observation because attaching a debugger, adding a print, or disabling optimization perturbs the timing window or interleaving it rides on — so disappearance-under-observation is the diagnostic tell, not evidence the bug is gone.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:heisenbug", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "heisenbug"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "heisenbug", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P027-C14-U1", "why_it_fits": "A heisenbug fixes the program and input while the failure appears or disappears as observation changes timing, memory layout, scheduling, or interleaving. The same behavior therefore yields different results depending on ambient global execution state."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The same behavior produces different results depending on caller, worker, host, or ambient global state.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A portable context bundle can be short-lived and need not cross any version change.", "slug": "portable_context_bundle"}], "residual_id": "r:definition_time_context_binding:b020_a13_c6", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b020_a13_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A behavior unit is defined under one set of bindings but later runs under another ambient context. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A long-lived behavior must survive context version change without silently changing meaning.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A long-lived behavior must survive context version change without silently changing meaning.", "A behavior unit is defined under one set of bindings but later runs under another ambient context."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A portable context bundle can be short-lived and need not cross any version change.", "slug": "portable_context_bundle"}], "normalized_requirement": "A long-lived behavior must survive context version change without silently changing meaning.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A long-lived behavior must survive context version change without silently changing meaning.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P027-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the behavior that uses the facts.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A behavior is the consumer of contextual facts.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve use-time currency, not only facts captured at definition time.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The needed facts are current at use time.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve necessity rather than optional enrichment.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The behavior needs those current facts.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an input relation through a boundary, not ambient undeclared access.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The facts enter the behavior through an input boundary.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require a restricted input surface rather than broad context capture.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The input boundary is narrow.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require the boundary to be declared or legible.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The input boundary is explicit.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve exclusivity; ambient or additional hidden use-time inputs violate the condition.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "Only the narrow explicit boundary admits current use-time facts.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}], "predicate": "The behavior needs current use-time facts, but only through a narrow and explicit input boundary.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A behavior requires current use-time facts while admitting them exclusively through a narrow explicit input boundary.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P027-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime can resolve entirely against captured definition-time context and need not admit current use-time facts.", "slug": "portable_context_bundle"}], "residual_id": "r:definition_time_context_binding:b020_a13_c7", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b020_a13_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The behavior needs current use-time facts, but only through a narrow and explicit input boundary. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The behavior needs current use-time facts, but only through a narrow and explicit input boundary."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime can resolve entirely against captured definition-time context and need not admit current use-time facts.", "slug": "portable_context_bundle"}], "normalized_requirement": "The behavior needs current use-time facts, but only through a narrow and explicit input boundary.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The behavior needs current use-time facts, but only through a narrow and explicit input boundary.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P028-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an action that executes after a delay rather than an immediately completed act.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A delayed action is the focal behavior unit.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must bind or convey authority with the action across the delay.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Authority travels with the delayed action into execution.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve necessity of carrying authority, not merely permission or possibility.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The authority transfer is required.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a later host context whose privileges are distinct from the carried authority.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The action eventually executes at a host with its own privileges.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must exclude acquisition of the eventual host's complete privilege set.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The action does not inherit the host's full privileges.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the privilege ceiling rather than transfer unrestricted ambient authority.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The carried authority is narrower than the host's full privileges.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Authority must travel with a delayed action without inheriting the full privileges of its eventual host.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A delayed action must carry authority into its eventual host while remaining barred from that host's full privileges.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P028-C01-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A context bundle can capture non-authority data or even full ambient privilege and does not require least-privilege authority transfer.", "slug": "portable_context_bundle"}], "residual_id": "r:definition_time_context_binding:b020_a13_c8", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b020_a13_c8", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Authority must travel with a delayed action without inheriting the full privileges of its eventual host. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Authority must travel with a delayed action without inheriting the full privileges of its eventual host."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A context bundle can capture non-authority data or even full ambient privilege and does not require least-privilege authority transfer.", "slug": "portable_context_bundle"}], "normalized_requirement": "Authority must travel with a delayed action without inheriting the full privileges of its eventual host.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Authority must travel with a delayed action without inheriting the full privileges of its eventual host.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [8], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Deterministic replay, reproducibility, audit, or legal traceability requires knowing which context governed an execution.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Deterministic replay, reproducibility, audit, or legal traceability requires knowing which context governed an execution. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Deterministic replay, reproducibility, audit, or legal traceability requires knowing which context governed an execution."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Deterministic replay, reproducibility, audit, or legal traceability requires knowing which context governed an execution."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 20, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-020", "ledger_sha256": "2c76bd49d32c5e09a63f9c0dbbd7c00102d31034b390a82226859edc9a7b4a6f"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Degrees-of-Freedom Reduction", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:degrees_of_freedom_reduction", "slug": "degrees_of_freedom_reduction"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 7, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 7 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 7}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is an excess of independent variation. Each additional independent variable multiplies the number of configurations, cases, or decisions that must be understood, tested, governed, or maintained. A small number of meaningful freedoms can support adaptation; a large number of unmanaged freedoms can create overfitting, inconsistency, error, and paralysis.\n\nThis problem often appears as choice overload, model sprawl, configuration sprawl, inconsistent local practice, too many labels, untested option combinations, or workflows where every case requires custom coordination.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system has too many independent choices, parameters, controls, labels, states, configuration options, or moving parts for reliable analysis, control, coordination, or use."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A low-power language can remove dangerous capability without reducing recurrent low-value choices.", "slug": "rule_of_least_power"}], "residual_id": "r:degrees_of_freedom_reduction:b020_a14_c1", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b020_a14_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Actors must repeatedly make low-value choices that do not materially change the desired outcome. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Actors must repeatedly make low-value choices that do not materially change the desired outcome."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A low-power language can remove dangerous capability without reducing recurrent low-value choices.", "slug": "rule_of_least_power"}], "normalized_requirement": "Actors must repeatedly make low-value choices that do not materially change the desired outcome.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Actors must repeatedly make low-value choices that do not materially change the desired outcome.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P028-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an object or activity that has independently variable parameters.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A parameterized system is the focal bearer.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve parameters that can vary independently, not undifferentiated complexity.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Independent parameters are the counted demands on support.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require evidential capacity to be insufficient relative to the parameter count.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The independent-parameter count exceeds what available evidence can support.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This unit requires evidence, rather than attention, governance, or skill, to be the insufficient capacity.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Evidence is the limiting support resource.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a model to have the excess independent parameters.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The focal bearer is a model.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a process to have the excess independent parameters.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The focal bearer is a process.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a product to have the excess independent parameters.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The focal bearer is a product.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a policy to have the excess independent parameters.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The focal bearer is a policy.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "A model, process, product, or policy has more independent parameters than available evidence can support.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "The independent-parameter count of a listed system type exceeds the support available from evidence.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P028-C02-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P028-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an object or activity that has independently variable parameters.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A parameterized system is the focal bearer.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve parameters that can vary independently, not undifferentiated complexity.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Independent parameters are the counted demands on support.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require attentional capacity to be insufficient relative to the parameter count.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The independent-parameter count exceeds what available attention can support.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This unit requires attention, rather than evidence, governance, or skill, to be the insufficient capacity.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Attention is the limiting support resource.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a model to have the excess independent parameters.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The focal bearer is a model.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a process to have the excess independent parameters.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The focal bearer is a process.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a product to have the excess independent parameters.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The focal bearer is a product.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a policy to have the excess independent parameters.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The focal bearer is a policy.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "A model, process, product, or policy has more independent parameters than available attention can support.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "The independent-parameter count of a listed system type exceeds the support available from attention.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P028-C02-U2"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P028-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an object or activity that has independently variable parameters.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A parameterized system is the focal bearer.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve parameters that can vary independently, not undifferentiated complexity.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Independent parameters are the counted demands on support.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require governance capacity to be insufficient relative to the parameter count.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The independent-parameter count exceeds available governance capacity.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This unit requires governance capacity, rather than evidence, attention, or skill, to be insufficient.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Governance capacity is the limiting support resource.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a model to have the excess independent parameters.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The focal bearer is a model.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a process to have the excess independent parameters.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The focal bearer is a process.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a product to have the excess independent parameters.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The focal bearer is a product.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a policy to have the excess independent parameters.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The focal bearer is a policy.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "A model, process, product, or policy has more independent parameters than available governance capacity can support.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "The independent-parameter count of a listed system type exceeds available governance capacity.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P028-C02-U3"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P028-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an object or activity that has independently variable parameters.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A parameterized system is the focal bearer.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve parameters that can vary independently, not undifferentiated complexity.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Independent parameters are the counted demands on support.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require operational skill to be insufficient relative to the parameter count.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The independent-parameter count exceeds available operational skill.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This unit requires operational skill, rather than evidence, attention, or governance, to be insufficient.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Operational skill is the limiting support resource.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a model to have the excess independent parameters.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The focal bearer is a model.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a process to have the excess independent parameters.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The focal bearer is a process.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a product to have the excess independent parameters.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The focal bearer is a product.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a policy to have the excess independent parameters.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The focal bearer is a policy.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "A model, process, product, or policy has more independent parameters than available operational skill can support.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "The independent-parameter count of a listed system type exceeds available operational skill.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P028-C02-U4"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A high-dimensional object can have ample evidence, attention, governance capacity, and operational skill for all of its dimensions.", "slug": "dimension"}], "residual_id": "r:degrees_of_freedom_reduction:b020_a14_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b020_a14_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when ordinary users must choose among too many settings, analysts tune too many model parameters, teams maintain too many local variations, or governance cannot audit all possible combinations. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A model, process, product, or policy has more independent parameters than available evidence, attention, governance capacity, or operational skill can support.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A model, process, product, or policy has more independent parameters than available evidence, attention, governance capacity, or operational skill can support.", "It is especially useful when ordinary users must choose among too many settings, analysts tune too many model parameters, teams maintain too many local variations, or governance cannot audit all possible combinations."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 4, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 4}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A high-dimensional object can have ample evidence, attention, governance capacity, and operational skill for all of its dimensions.", "slug": "dimension"}], "normalized_requirement": "A model, process, product, or policy has more independent parameters than available evidence, attention, governance capacity, or operational skill can support.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 4 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A model, process, product, or policy has more independent parameters than available evidence, attention, governance capacity, or operational skill can support.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P028-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve more than one distinct adjusting unit or user.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Different actors adjust the variables.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve independent adjustment rather than coordinated joint control.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The actors currently adjust the variables independently.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the normative requirement for coupling, not merely possible coupling.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The variables should be coupled.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must connect the required coupling to consistency across the adjusted variables.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Consistency is the purpose of coupling.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires multiple units to make the independent adjustments.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Different organizational or operational units are the adjusting actors.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires multiple users to make the independent adjustments.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "Different users are the adjusting actors.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}], "predicate": "Different units or users independently adjust variables that should be coupled for consistency.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Variables independently adjusted by multiple actors should instead be coupled for consistency.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P028-C03-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P028-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve more than one distinct adjusting unit or user.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Different actors adjust the variables.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve independent adjustment rather than a shared standard.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The actors currently adjust the variables independently.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the normative requirement for standardization, not mere similarity.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The variables should be standardized.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must connect the required standardization to consistency across adjustments.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Consistency is the purpose of standardization.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires multiple units to make the independent adjustments.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Different organizational or operational units are the adjusting actors.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires multiple users to make the independent adjustments.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "Different users are the adjusting actors.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}], "predicate": "Different units or users independently adjust variables that should be standardized for consistency.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Variables independently adjusted by multiple actors should instead be standardized for consistency.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P028-C03-U2"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P028-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve more than one distinct adjusting unit or user.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Different actors adjust the variables.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve independent adjustment rather than enforcement of shared bounds.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The actors currently adjust the variables independently.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the normative requirement for limits on the variables.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The variables should be bounded.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must connect the required bounds to consistency across adjustments.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Consistency is the purpose of bounding.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires multiple units to make the independent adjustments.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Different organizational or operational units are the adjusting actors.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires multiple users to make the independent adjustments.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "Different users are the adjusting actors.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}], "predicate": "Different units or users independently adjust variables that should be bounded for consistency.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Variables independently adjusted by multiple actors should instead be bounded for consistency.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P028-C03-U3"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Coupling can be intentionally weak and does not entail a current consistency failure from user-adjusted variables.", "slug": "coupling"}], "residual_id": "r:degrees_of_freedom_reduction:b020_a14_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b020_a14_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Different units or users independently adjust variables that should be coupled, standardized, or bounded for consistency. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Different units or users independently adjust variables that should be coupled, standardized, or bounded for consistency."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 3, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 3}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Coupling can be intentionally weak and does not entail a current consistency failure from user-adjusted variables.", "slug": "coupling"}], "normalized_requirement": "Different units or users independently adjust variables that should be coupled, standardized, or bounded for consistency.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 3 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Different units or users independently adjust variables that should be coupled, standardized, or bounded for consistency.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P028-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a count or space of possible configurations rather than observed cases alone.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The number of possible configurations is the growing quantity.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve growth over time or successive system versions.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The possible-configuration count grows.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve testing capacity directed at the same possible configurations.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Ability to test those configurations is the comparison capacity.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the direction of the rate comparison, with configuration growth outpacing testing capacity.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Configuration count grows faster than testing ability.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "The number of possible configurations grows faster than the ability to test them.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Possible-configuration count grows faster than testing capacity for those configurations.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P028-C04-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P028-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a count or space of possible configurations rather than observed cases alone.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The number of possible configurations is the growing quantity.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve growth over time or successive system versions.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The possible-configuration count grows.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve explanatory capacity directed at the same possible configurations.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Ability to explain those configurations is the comparison capacity.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the direction of the rate comparison, with configuration growth outpacing explanatory capacity.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Configuration count grows faster than explanatory ability.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "The number of possible configurations grows faster than the ability to explain them.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Possible-configuration count grows faster than explanatory capacity for those configurations.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P028-C04-U2"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P028-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a count or space of possible configurations rather than observed cases alone.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The number of possible configurations is the growing quantity.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve growth over time or successive system versions.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The possible-configuration count grows.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve maintenance capacity directed at the same possible configurations.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Ability to maintain those configurations is the comparison capacity.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the direction of the rate comparison, with configuration growth outpacing maintenance capacity.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Configuration count grows faster than maintenance ability.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "The number of possible configurations grows faster than the ability to maintain them.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Possible-configuration count grows faster than maintenance capacity for those configurations.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P028-C04-U3"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Independent parameter count does not necessarily exceed testing or maintenance capacity.", "slug": "degrees_of_freedom"}], "residual_id": "r:degrees_of_freedom_reduction:b020_a14_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b020_a14_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Each additional independent variable multiplies the number of configurations, cases, or decisions that must be understood, tested, governed, or maintained. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The number of possible configurations grows faster than the ability to test, explain, or maintain them.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The number of possible configurations grows faster than the ability to test, explain, or maintain them.", "Each additional independent variable multiplies the number of configurations, cases, or decisions that must be understood, tested, governed, or maintained."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 3, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 3}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Independent parameter count does not necessarily exceed testing or maintenance capacity.", "slug": "degrees_of_freedom"}], "normalized_requirement": "The number of possible configurations grows faster than the ability to test, explain, or maintain them.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 3 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The number of possible configurations grows faster than the ability to test, explain, or maintain them.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P028-C05", "dnf": [], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [], "predicate": "Expert users may need flexibility.", "resolution": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RESIDUAL", "semantic_scope": "NON_ABSTRACTION", "structural_head": "Expert users may need flexibility.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P028-C05-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P028-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a majority or ordinary-user population rather than experts alone.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Most users are the affected user tier.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve choices currently available for active use, not latent system capacity alone.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The active choice space is the focal design feature.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a reduction relative to the larger available choice space.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The active choice space needs to be smaller.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve requirement or necessity, not merely preference or possibility.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Most users need the reduction.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must connect choice-space reduction to preventing the selected adverse outcome.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The smaller active choice space is needed to avoid a listed harm.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires error prevention to motivate the smaller choice space.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "Error is the harm to be avoided.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires delay prevention to motivate the smaller choice space.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "Delay is the harm to be avoided.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Most users need a smaller active choice space to avoid error or delay.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Most users require a smaller active choice space to avoid one listed harm.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P028-C05-U2"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Degrees of freedom are substrate-neutral and do not require expert and ordinary user tiers or error-prone interfaces.", "slug": "degrees_of_freedom"}], "residual_id": "r:degrees_of_freedom_reduction:b020_a14_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b020_a14_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Expert users may need flexibility, but most users need a smaller active choice space to avoid error or delay. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Expert users may need flexibility, but most users need a smaller active choice space to avoid error or delay."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 1, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Degrees of freedom are substrate-neutral and do not require expert and ordinary user tiers or error-prone interfaces.", "slug": "degrees_of_freedom"}], "normalized_requirement": "Expert users may need flexibility, but most users need a smaller active choice space to avoid error or delay.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Expert users may need flexibility, but most users need a smaller active choice space to avoid error or delay.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P028-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve one system as the common cause of both outcomes.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The same current system handles both case classes.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve exceptional cases as the cases made easy.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Exceptions are one case class.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve ease of handling exceptions, not mere availability of exceptions.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The system makes exceptions easy.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve ordinary cases as distinct from the exceptions.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Ordinary cases are the comparison class.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve complication imposed on ordinary cases.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The system makes ordinary cases complicated.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve avoidability or lack of necessity of the ordinary-case complexity.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The complication of ordinary cases is unnecessary.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the asymmetric treatment of the two case classes in the same system.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "Exception ease contrasts with ordinary-case complication.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "The current system makes exceptions easy but makes ordinary cases unnecessarily complicated.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "The same system makes exceptions easy while making ordinary cases unnecessarily complicated.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P028-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Many independent parameters can make both exceptions and ordinary cases easy, and no exception structure is necessary.", "slug": "degrees_of_freedom"}], "residual_id": "r:degrees_of_freedom_reduction:b020_a14_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b020_a14_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The current system makes exceptions easy but makes ordinary cases unnecessarily complicated. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The current system makes exceptions easy but makes ordinary cases unnecessarily complicated."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Many independent parameters can make both exceptions and ordinary cases easy, and no exception structure is necessary.", "slug": "degrees_of_freedom"}], "normalized_requirement": "The current system makes exceptions easy but makes ordinary cases unnecessarily complicated.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The current system makes exceptions easy but makes ordinary cases unnecessarily complicated.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P028-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve more than one variable characterized as independent, without requiring separate controllers or independently chosen settings.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Multiple independent variables are present.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve cross-variable interaction rather than isolated effects.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The independent variables interact.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the interaction-to-hidden-incompatibilities causal direction.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The interaction creates hidden incompatibilities.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve lack of visibility of the incompatibilities.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The incompatibilities are hidden.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Independent variables interact in ways that create hidden incompatibilities.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Interactions among independent variables create hidden incompatibilities.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P028-C07-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P028-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve more than one variable characterized as independent, without requiring separate controllers or independently chosen settings.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Multiple independent variables are present.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve cross-variable interaction rather than isolated effects.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The independent variables interact.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the interaction-to-overfitting causal direction.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The interaction creates overfitting.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve fit to observed data at the expense of generalization as the outcome.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Overfitting is the resulting failure.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Independent variables interact in ways that create overfitting.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Interactions among independent variables create overfitting.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P028-C07-U2"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P028-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve more than one variable characterized as independent, without requiring separate controllers or independently chosen settings.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Multiple independent variables are present.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve cross-variable interaction rather than isolated effects.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The independent variables interact.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the interaction-to-inconsistent-treatment causal direction.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The interaction creates inconsistent treatment.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve differential or nonuniform treatment as the outcome.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Inconsistent treatment is the resulting failure.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Independent variables interact in ways that create inconsistent treatment.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Interactions among independent variables create inconsistent treatment.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P028-C07-U3"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P028-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve more than one variable characterized as independent, without requiring separate controllers or independently chosen settings.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Multiple independent variables are present.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve cross-variable interaction rather than isolated effects.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The independent variables interact.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the interaction-to-coordination-burden causal direction.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The interaction creates coordination burden.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve added coordination work as the outcome.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Coordination burden is the resulting cost.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Independent variables interact in ways that create coordination burden.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Interactions among independent variables create coordination burden.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P028-C07-U4"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Statistically independent variables definitionally lack dependence and need not create hidden interactions or coordination burden.", "slug": "statistical_independence"}], "residual_id": "r:degrees_of_freedom_reduction:b020_a14_c7", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b020_a14_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Each additional independent variable multiplies the number of configurations, cases, or decisions that must be understood, tested, governed, or maintained. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Independent variables interact in ways that create hidden incompatibilities, overfitting, inconsistent treatment, or coordination burden.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Independent variables interact in ways that create hidden incompatibilities, overfitting, inconsistent treatment, or coordination burden.", "Each additional independent variable multiplies the number of configurations, cases, or decisions that must be understood, tested, governed, or maintained."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 4, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 4}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Statistically independent variables definitionally lack dependence and need not create hidden interactions or coordination burden.", "slug": "statistical_independence"}], "normalized_requirement": "Independent variables interact in ways that create hidden incompatibilities, overfitting, inconsistent treatment, or coordination burden.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 4 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Independent variables interact in ways that create hidden incompatibilities, overfitting, inconsistent treatment, or coordination burden.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 20, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-020", "ledger_sha256": "2c76bd49d32c5e09a63f9c0dbbd7c00102d31034b390a82226859edc9a7b4a6f"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Demand Curve Calibration and Response Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:demand_curve_calibration_and_response_design", "slug": "demand_curve_calibration_and_response_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 5, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 6 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A decision maker sees requests, purchases, usage, applications, waitlists, clicks, traffic, load, or survey interest and needs to decide how much capacity, price, access, stock, staffing, or priority to provide. Without an explicit demand schedule, the system treats one observed quantity as if it were stable demand, misses the generalized cost conditions that produced it, ignores substitution paths, overgeneralizes average elasticity, and confuses suppressed, latent, induced, shifted, or strategic demand with simple volume.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A decision maker sees requests, purchases, usage, applications, waitlists, clicks, traffic, load, or survey interest and needs to decide how much capacity, price, access, stock, staffing, or priority to provide. Without an explicit demand schedule, the system treats one observed quantity as if it were stable demand, misses the generalized cost conditions that produced it, ignores substitution paths, overgeneralizes average elasticity, and confuses suppressed, latent, induced, shifted, or strategic demand with simple volume."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime is a schedule relating quantity sought to generalized cost, including price and nonprice friction.", "role_mapping": "Quantity -> quantity sought; cost/friction -> generalized cost; changes -> demand schedule.", "slug": "demand", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime measures the fractional change in quantity demanded induced by a price change.", "role_mapping": "Quantity -> demand; cost -> price; changes -> elasticity response.", "slug": "price_elasticity", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b020_a15_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Without an explicit demand schedule, the system treats one observed quantity as if it were stable demand, misses the generalized cost conditions that produced it, ignores substitution paths, overgeneralizes average elasticity, and confuses suppressed, latent, induced, shifted, or strategic demand with simple volume. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Quantity changes with cost or friction.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Quantity changes with cost or friction", "Without an explicit demand schedule, the system treats one observed quantity as if it were stable demand, misses the generalized cost conditions that produced it, ignores substitution paths, overgeneralizes average elasticity, and confuses suppressed, latent, induced, shifted, or strategic demand with simple volume."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Demand", "one_liner": "A schedule relating quantity sought to generalized cost, with slope, elasticity, and substitution structure.", "page_ref": "prime:demand", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Quantity -> quantity sought; cost/friction -> generalized cost; changes -> demand schedule.", "slug": "demand", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime is a schedule relating quantity sought to generalized cost, including price and nonprice friction."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Price Elasticity", "one_liner": "Sensitivity to price changes.", "page_ref": "prime:price_elasticity", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Quantity -> demand; cost -> price; changes -> elasticity response.", "slug": "price_elasticity", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime measures the fractional change in quantity demanded induced by a price change."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Quantity changes with cost or friction.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Calibration can align an output to a reference without any decision lever or demand response.", "slug": "calibration"}], "residual_id": "r:demand_curve_calibration_and_response_design:b020_a15_c2", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b020_a15_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Decisions need a tractable model, yet the relevant cost is multidimensional, response varies by segment, substitutes reshape the curve, and interventions can move along the curve or shift it. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Decisions depend on response to a lever.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Decisions depend on response to a lever", "Decisions need a tractable model, yet the relevant cost is multidimensional, response varies by segment, substitutes reshape the curve, and interventions can move along the curve or shift it."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Calibration can align an output to a reference without any decision lever or demand response.", "slug": "calibration"}], "normalized_requirement": "Decisions depend on response to a lever.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Decisions depend on response to a lever.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A demand schedule can be modeled for a good with negligible cross-effects from substitutes or complements.", "slug": "demand"}], "residual_id": "r:demand_curve_calibration_and_response_design:b020_a15_c3", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b020_a15_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Substitutes or complements matter. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Substitutes or complements matter"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A demand schedule can be modeled for a good with negligible cross-effects from substitutes or complements.", "slug": "demand"}], "normalized_requirement": "Substitutes or complements matter.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Substitutes or complements matter.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Price discrimination can segment equal-cost customers by willingness to pay and does not require different external constraints.", "slug": "price_discrimination"}], "residual_id": "r:demand_curve_calibration_and_response_design:b020_a15_c4", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b020_a15_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Segments face different constraints. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Segments face different constraints"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Price discrimination can segment equal-cost customers by willingness to pay and does not require different external constraints.", "slug": "price_discrimination"}], "normalized_requirement": "Segments face different constraints.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Segments face different constraints.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Observed demand can fully express the relevant quantity schedule with no latent or suppressed component.", "slug": "demand"}], "residual_id": "r:demand_curve_calibration_and_response_design:b020_a15_c5", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b020_a15_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Without an explicit demand schedule, the system treats one observed quantity as if it were stable demand, misses the generalized cost conditions that produced it, ignores substitution paths, overgeneralizes average elasticity, and confuses suppressed, latent, induced, shifted, or strategic demand with simple volume. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Latent or suppressed demand is plausible.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Latent or suppressed demand is plausible", "Without an explicit demand schedule, the system treats one observed quantity as if it were stable demand, misses the generalized cost conditions that produced it, ignores substitution paths, overgeneralizes average elasticity, and confuses suppressed, latent, induced, shifted, or strategic demand with simple volume."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Observed demand can fully express the relevant quantity schedule with no latent or suppressed component.", "slug": "demand"}], "normalized_requirement": "Latent or suppressed demand is plausible.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Latent or suppressed demand is plausible.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A demand curve need not be changed by the intervention itself or exhibit rebound beyond its ordinary movement along the curve.", "slug": "demand"}], "residual_id": "r:demand_curve_calibration_and_response_design:b020_a15_c6", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b020_a15_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Without an explicit demand schedule, the system treats one observed quantity as if it were stable demand, misses the generalized cost conditions that produced it, ignores substitution paths, overgeneralizes average elasticity, and confuses suppressed, latent, induced, shifted, or strategic demand with simple volume. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Induced or rebound demand is plausible.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Induced or rebound demand is plausible", "Without an explicit demand schedule, the system treats one observed quantity as if it were stable demand, misses the generalized cost conditions that produced it, ignores substitution paths, overgeneralizes average elasticity, and confuses suppressed, latent, induced, shifted, or strategic demand with simple volume."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A demand curve need not be changed by the intervention itself or exhibit rebound beyond its ordinary movement along the curve.", "slug": "demand"}], "normalized_requirement": "Induced or rebound demand is plausible.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Induced or rebound demand is plausible.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A forecast alone is insufficient.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: A forecast alone is insufficient. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A forecast alone is insufficient"]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "A forecast alone is insufficient"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 20, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-020", "ledger_sha256": "2c76bd49d32c5e09a63f9c0dbbd7c00102d31034b390a82226859edc9a7b4a6f"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Demand-Triggered Deferred Evaluation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:demand_triggered_deferred_evaluation", "slug": "demand_triggered_deferred_evaluation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 4 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system eagerly computes, loads, initializes, copies, traverses, or generates outputs before it knows whether any downstream path will use them. Optional branches, large sequences, expensive dependencies, remote data, and rarely used features consume time, memory, bandwidth, energy, and failure surface even when abandoned. Ad hoc laziness can reverse the waste but hide execution timing, move failures far from construction, retain stale inputs, duplicate concurrent work, trigger side effects late, and create first-use latency cliffs. The problem is therefore not merely “do less work”; it is to make nonexecution, later realization, and result publication part of an explicit contract.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Work is executed before downstream demand is known, so materially optional work and portions outside the demanded dependency closure consume resources without producing a used result."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The present system executes the relevant work before downstream demand is established.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The present system executes the relevant work before downstream demand is established.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires an optional nonexecution path: downstream demand may never arrive, so a prepared work specification remains unrealized.", "role_mapping": "Prepared optional work -> deferred specification; never consumed -> demand never arrives.", "slug": "lazy_evaluation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b021_a01_c1a", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A material fraction of prepared work is never consumed because branches, fields, features, targets, or records are optional. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A material fraction of prepared work is never consumed because branches, fields, features, targets, or records are optional."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Lazy Evaluation", "one_liner": "Defer work until its result is actually demanded.", "page_ref": "prime:lazy_evaluation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Prepared optional work -> deferred specification; never consumed -> demand never arrives.", "slug": "lazy_evaluation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires an optional nonexecution path: downstream demand may never arrive, so a prepared work specification remains unrealized."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Prepared work lies on optional paths and may never be consumed.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid lazy instance can avoid only a negligible amount of work; the prime does not impose a material-fraction threshold.", "slug": "lazy_evaluation"}], "residual_id": "r:demand_triggered_deferred_evaluation:b021_a01_c1b", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b021_a01_c1b", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A material fraction of prepared work is never consumed because branches, fields, features, targets, or records are optional. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A material fraction of prepared work is never consumed because branches, fields, features, targets, or records are optional."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid lazy instance can avoid only a negligible amount of work; the prime does not impose a material-fraction threshold.", "slug": "lazy_evaluation"}], "normalized_requirement": "The unused share of prepared work is material.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The unused share of prepared work is material.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P028-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a single requested output rather than all possible outputs.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "One requested result is the focal demand.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the transitive work dependencies needed for that requested result.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The focal result has a dependency closure of required work.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the complete graph of work that could be performed.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The full possible work graph is the comparison baseline.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must compare the requested closure against its encompassing work graph, not unrelated workloads.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The dependency closure lies within the same possible work graph.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a material size gap in the stated direction.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The requested closure is substantially smaller than the full graph.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "The dependency closure for one requested result is substantially smaller than the full possible work graph.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "One requested result's dependency closure is substantially smaller than the full possible work graph.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P028-C08-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Laziness can defer one optional unit or even force nearly all possible work; neither a dependency graph nor a substantially smaller requested closure is mandatory.", "slug": "lazy_evaluation"}], "residual_id": "r:demand_triggered_deferred_evaluation:b021_a01_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b021_a01_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The problem is therefore not merely “do less work”; it is to make nonexecution, later realization, and result publication part of an explicit contract. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The dependency closure for one requested result is substantially smaller than the full possible work graph.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The dependency closure for one requested result is substantially smaller than the full possible work graph.", "The problem is therefore not merely “do less work”; it is to make nonexecution, later realization, and result publication part of an explicit contract."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Laziness can defer one optional unit or even force nearly all possible work; neither a dependency graph nor a substantially smaller requested closure is mandatory.", "slug": "lazy_evaluation"}], "normalized_requirement": "The dependency closure for one requested result is substantially smaller than the full possible work graph.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The dependency closure for one requested result is substantially smaller than the full possible work graph.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The work can be represented before execution without losing the information needed to realize it safely later.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The problem is therefore not merely “do less work”; it is to make nonexecution, later realization, and result publication part of an explicit contract. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: The work can be represented before execution without losing the information needed to realize it safely later. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The work can be represented before execution without losing the information needed to realize it safely later.", "The problem is therefore not merely “do less work”; it is to make nonexecution, later realization, and result publication part of an explicit contract."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "The work can be represented before execution without losing the information needed to realize it safely later."}, {"display_text": "A reliable event can distinguish actual demand from prediction, inspection, logging, or mere object existence.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: A reliable event can distinguish actual demand from prediction, inspection, logging, or mere object existence. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A reliable event can distinguish actual demand from prediction, inspection, logging, or mere object existence."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "A reliable event can distinguish actual demand from prediction, inspection, logging, or mere object existence."}, {"display_text": "First-use latency can be bounded, hidden, scheduled, or accepted in exchange for avoided work.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Eager realization offers predictable timing, early failure, and simple lifetime semantics but wastes work on unused possibilities; lazy realization avoids that waste and enables large or infinite structures but transfers cost and uncertainty into first-demand latency, hidden timing, retained state, concurrency, failure attribution, and side-effect governance. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: First-use latency can be bounded, hidden, scheduled, or accepted in exchange for avoided work. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["First-use latency can be bounded, hidden, scheduled, or accepted in exchange for avoided work.", "Eager realization offers predictable timing, early failure, and simple lifetime semantics but wastes work on unused possibilities; lazy realization avoids that waste and enables large or infinite structures but transfers cost and uncertainty into first-demand latency, hidden timing, retained state, concurrency, failure attribution, and side-effect governance."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "First-use latency can be bounded, hidden, scheduled, or accepted in exchange for avoided work."}, {"display_text": "The work is pure, idempotent, isolated, compensatable, or otherwise safe to delay or potentially repeat.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: The work is pure, idempotent, isolated, compensatable, or otherwise safe to delay or potentially repeat. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The work is pure, idempotent, isolated, compensatable, or otherwise safe to delay or potentially repeat."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The work is pure, idempotent, isolated, compensatable, or otherwise safe to delay or potentially repeat."}, {"display_text": "Concurrent demand may be coalesced under a stable identity without crossing security or tenancy boundaries.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: Concurrent demand may be coalesced under a stable identity without crossing security or tenancy boundaries. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Concurrent demand may be coalesced under a stable identity without crossing security or tenancy boundaries."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "Concurrent demand may be coalesced under a stable identity without crossing security or tenancy boundaries."}, {"display_text": "Inputs, permissions, versions, and resources can remain valid until realization or be reacquired safely.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: Inputs, permissions, versions, and resources can remain valid until realization or be reacquired safely. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Inputs, permissions, versions, and resources can remain valid until realization or be reacquired safely."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 8, "text": "Inputs, permissions, versions, and resources can remain valid until realization or be reacquired safely."}, {"display_text": "The system can observe which demand forced which work and can compare lazy behavior with eager alternatives.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Eager realization offers predictable timing, early failure, and simple lifetime semantics but wastes work on unused possibilities; lazy realization avoids that waste and enables large or infinite structures but transfers cost and uncertainty into first-demand latency, hidden timing, retained state, concurrency, failure attribution, and side-effect governance. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: The system can observe which demand forced which work and can compare lazy behavior with eager alternatives. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [9], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The system can observe which demand forced which work and can compare lazy behavior with eager alternatives.", "Eager realization offers predictable timing, early failure, and simple lifetime semantics but wastes work on unused possibilities; lazy realization avoids that waste and enables large or infinite structures but transfers cost and uncertainty into first-demand latency, hidden timing, retained state, concurrency, failure attribution, and side-effect governance."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 9, "text": "The system can observe which demand forced which work and can compare lazy behavior with eager alternatives."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 21, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-021", "ledger_sha256": "91a43e408f8849a0887979d25b17b9ad399b9052a3e7e98be91ec6258e76e657"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Dense-Subset Coverage Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:dense_subset_coverage_design", "slug": "dense_subset_coverage_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 1 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 1}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system must reason about, test, serve, observe, or represent a large target space, but exhaustive coverage is impossible and ordinary samples leave unmeasured gaps whose relation to the rest of the domain is unclear.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A target domain is too large to enumerate directly, leaving consequential interstitial or sparse cases outside ordinary category coverage."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A dense-set relation can hold in a small or operationally manageable host; density is explicitly independent of cardinality and does not entail enumeration infeasibility.", "slug": "dense_set"}], "residual_id": "r:dense_subset_coverage_design:b021_a02_c1", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b021_a02_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The target domain is continuous, very large, high-dimensional, geographically extended, semantically varied, or otherwise too large to enumerate case by case. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The target domain is continuous, very large, high-dimensional, geographically extended, semantically varied, or otherwise too large to enumerate case by case."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A dense-set relation can hold in a small or operationally manageable host; density is explicitly independent of cardinality and does not entail enumeration infeasibility.", "slug": "dense_set"}], "normalized_requirement": "The target domain is continuous, very large, high-dimensional, extended, varied, or otherwise too large to enumerate case by case.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The target domain is continuous, very large, high-dimensional, extended, varied, or otherwise too large to enumerate case by case.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "There is a meaningful distance, similarity, neighborhood, reachability, or tolerance relation between target cases.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system must reason about, test, serve, observe, or represent a large target space, but exhaustive coverage is impossible and ordinary samples leave unmeasured gaps whose relation to the rest of the domain is unclear. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: There is a meaningful distance, similarity, neighborhood, reachability, or tolerance relation between target cases. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["There is a meaningful distance, similarity, neighborhood, reachability, or tolerance relation between target cases.", "A system must reason about, test, serve, observe, or represent a large target space, but exhaustive coverage is impossible and ordinary samples leave unmeasured gaps whose relation to the rest of the domain is unclear."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "There is a meaningful distance, similarity, neighborhood, reachability, or tolerance relation between target cases."}, {"display_text": "A nearby anchor can legitimately stand in for an unhandled point for the purpose at hand.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: A nearby anchor can legitimately stand in for an unhandled point for the purpose at hand. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A nearby anchor can legitimately stand in for an unhandled point for the purpose at hand."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "A nearby anchor can legitimately stand in for an unhandled point for the purpose at hand."}, {"display_text": "The cost of coverage depends on how many anchors, probes, examples, tests, sensors, or service points are maintained.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The organization needs a finite handle on an effectively infinite or too-large space, but a finite subset is only safe when its relation to unsampled points is explicit, local, and maintained. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The cost of coverage depends on how many anchors, probes, examples, tests, sensors, or service points are maintained. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The cost of coverage depends on how many anchors, probes, examples, tests, sensors, or service points are maintained.", "The organization needs a finite handle on an effectively infinite or too-large space, but a finite subset is only safe when its relation to unsampled points is explicit, local, and maintained."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The cost of coverage depends on how many anchors, probes, examples, tests, sensors, or service points are maintained."}, {"display_text": "Uncovered interstitial cases, edge cases, or sparse regions would create failures that ordinary category coverage might miss.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system must reason about, test, serve, observe, or represent a large target space, but exhaustive coverage is impossible and ordinary samples leave unmeasured gaps whose relation to the rest of the domain is unclear. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Uncovered interstitial cases, edge cases, or sparse regions would create failures that ordinary category coverage might miss. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Uncovered interstitial cases, edge cases, or sparse regions would create failures that ordinary category coverage might miss.", "A system must reason about, test, serve, observe, or represent a large target space, but exhaustive coverage is impossible and ordinary samples leave unmeasured gaps whose relation to the rest of the domain is unclear."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Uncovered interstitial cases, edge cases, or sparse regions would create failures that ordinary category coverage might miss."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 21, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-021", "ledger_sha256": "91a43e408f8849a0887979d25b17b9ad399b9052a3e7e98be91ec6258e76e657"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": [{"groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Without the branch selector, a miss can instead concern an unenumerated parameter or slow-developing state and need not be interstitial. With the selector, reversing the result would require a cross-node interaction wholly contained in one per-node category, contradicting the selected branch.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "HAZOP Guideword Miss", "one_liner": "The structural failure in which a HAZOP's finite guideword-times-parameter-times-node grid never generates the deviation that later causes an incident, because the hazard fell outside the schema's coverage boundary and was never identified, safeguarded, or risk-assessed.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:hazop_guideword_miss", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O5"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "hazop_cross_node_interaction_miss", "predicate": "the missed HAZOP deviation is a cross-node interaction outside the finite guideword-parameter-node grid", "rationale": "The emitted context guard selects one exact-record branch, is atomic and candidate-anchored, and leaves no complete guarded counterexample."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "hazop_guideword_miss"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "hazop_cross_node_interaction_miss"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "hazop_guideword_miss", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P028-C10-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record directly supplies uncovered schema coverage, a later failure, and possible categorical escape. One candidate-anchored branch selector restricts the miss to its expressly named cross-node-interaction manifestation, a subtype-preserving interstitial case relative to node-by-node coverage."}], "publication_role": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT_ONLY", "source_residual_occurrence_id": "r:dense_subset_coverage_design:b021_a02_c5", "unit": {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P028-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve absence from the existing coverage rather than difficult but covered cases.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The focal cases or regions are uncovered.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the conditional direction from uncovered instances to failures.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The uncovered cases or regions would create failures.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve category-based ordinary coverage rather than an unrelated monitoring system.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Ordinary category coverage is the failing coverage mechanism.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the possibility that those failures escape ordinary category coverage.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Ordinary category coverage might miss the failures.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires gaps between ordinary categories to be focal.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Interstitial cases are the uncovered instances.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires boundary or exceptional cases to be focal.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "Edge cases are the uncovered instances.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires sparsely represented regions to be focal.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "Sparse regions are the uncovered instances.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Uncovered interstitial, edge, or sparse cases would create failures that ordinary category coverage might miss.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An uncovered case or region of one listed type would create failures that ordinary category coverage might miss.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P028-C10-U1"}}]}
{"archetype": {"name": "Dependency-Aware Change Notification", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:dependency_aware_change_notification", "slug": "dependency_aware_change_notification"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system owner decides or schedules a change, but affected dependents do not receive targeted, actionable, timely warning; they discover the change too late, through the wrong channel, or without enough detail to prepare, causing breakage, mistrust, unsafe adaptation, or coordination failure.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A decided change will bind external dependents who need adaptation time, while the change-maker's prior knowledge is not converted into timely targeted warning."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a decided-but-unbound change aimed at parties who depend on the changing system and will be affected.", "role_mapping": "Planned change -> decided-but-unbound change; outside affected parties -> directed dependents.", "slug": "change_notification", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b021_a03_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A planned change will alter behavior, access, compatibility, obligations, timing, meaning, location, pricing, capacity, or risk for parties outside the change-making team. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A planned change will alter behavior, access, compatibility, obligations, timing, meaning, location, pricing, capacity, or risk for parties outside the change-making team."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Change Notification", "one_liner": "Advance warning, directed at those who depend on a system, that it is about to change in a way they need lead time to prepare for.", "page_ref": "prime:change_notification", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Planned change -> decided-but-unbound change; outside affected parties -> directed dependents.", "slug": "change_notification", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a decided-but-unbound change aimed at parties who depend on the changing system and will be affected."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A planned change will alter behavior, access, compatibility, obligations, timing, meaning, location, pricing, capacity, or risk for parties outside the change-making team.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's asymmetry-equalizing invariant starts with the change-maker privately knowing a settled upcoming change before dependents.", "role_mapping": "Change-maker -> informed source; dependents -> later-informed affected audience.", "slug": "change_notification", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b021_a03_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The change-maker has privileged knowledge of the change before affected dependents do. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The change-maker has privileged knowledge of the change before affected dependents do."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Change Notification", "one_liner": "Advance warning, directed at those who depend on a system, that it is about to change in a way they need lead time to prepare for.", "page_ref": "prime:change_notification", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Change-maker -> informed source; dependents -> later-informed affected audience.", "slug": "change_notification", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's asymmetry-equalizing invariant starts with the change-maker privately knowing a settled upcoming change before dependents."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The change-maker has privileged knowledge before affected dependents do.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "Targeted actionable warning is absent, too late, misdirected, or too incomplete to enable preparation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Targeted actionable warning is absent, too late, misdirected, or too incomplete to enable preparation.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Affected parties need time to migrate, reconfigure, train, comment, hedge, evacuate, update documentation, adjust schedules, or verify compatibility.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system owner decides or schedules a change, but affected dependents do not receive targeted, actionable, timely warning; they discover the change too late, through the wrong channel, or without enough detail to prepare, causing breakage, mistrust, unsafe adaptation, or coordination failure. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: Affected parties need time to migrate, reconfigure, train, comment, hedge, evacuate, update documentation, adjust schedules, or verify compatibility. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Affected parties need time to migrate, reconfigure, train, comment, hedge, evacuate, update documentation, adjust schedules, or verify compatibility.", "A system owner decides or schedules a change, but affected dependents do not receive targeted, actionable, timely warning; they discover the change too late, through the wrong channel, or without enough detail to prepare, causing breakage, mistrust, unsafe adaptation, or coordination failure."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "Affected parties need time to migrate, reconfigure, train, comment, hedge, evacuate, update documentation, adjust schedules, or verify compatibility."}, {"display_text": "Failure to warn creates avoidable harm, service interruption, wasted work, compliance risk, trust loss, or unsafe last-minute adaptation.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system owner decides or schedules a change, but affected dependents do not receive targeted, actionable, timely warning; they discover the change too late, through the wrong channel, or without enough detail to prepare, causing breakage, mistrust, unsafe adaptation, or coordination failure. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Failure to warn creates avoidable harm, service interruption, wasted work, compliance risk, trust loss, or unsafe last-minute adaptation. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Failure to warn creates avoidable harm, service interruption, wasted work, compliance risk, trust loss, or unsafe last-minute adaptation.", "A system owner decides or schedules a change, but affected dependents do not receive targeted, actionable, timely warning; they discover the change too late, through the wrong channel, or without enough detail to prepare, causing breakage, mistrust, unsafe adaptation, or coordination failure."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Failure to warn creates avoidable harm, service interruption, wasted work, compliance risk, trust loss, or unsafe last-minute adaptation."}, {"display_text": "The affected population is heterogeneous, with different dependency depths, channels, languages, accessibility needs, or preparation windows.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system owner decides or schedules a change, but affected dependents do not receive targeted, actionable, timely warning; they discover the change too late, through the wrong channel, or without enough detail to prepare, causing breakage, mistrust, unsafe adaptation, or coordination failure. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: The affected population is heterogeneous, with different dependency depths, channels, languages, accessibility needs, or preparation windows. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The affected population is heterogeneous, with different dependency depths, channels, languages, accessibility needs, or preparation windows.", "A system owner decides or schedules a change, but affected dependents do not receive targeted, actionable, timely warning; they discover the change too late, through the wrong channel, or without enough detail to prepare, causing breakage, mistrust, unsafe adaptation, or coordination failure."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The affected population is heterogeneous, with different dependency depths, channels, languages, accessibility needs, or preparation windows."}, {"display_text": "A prior change produced surprise, missed deadlines, brittle migration, silent breakage, or claims that parties were informed when they were not realistically prepared.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system owner decides or schedules a change, but affected dependents do not receive targeted, actionable, timely warning; they discover the change too late, through the wrong channel, or without enough detail to prepare, causing breakage, mistrust, unsafe adaptation, or coordination failure. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: A prior change produced surprise, missed deadlines, brittle migration, silent breakage, or claims that parties were informed when they were not realistically prepared. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A prior change produced surprise, missed deadlines, brittle migration, silent breakage, or claims that parties were informed when they were not realistically prepared.", "A system owner decides or schedules a change, but affected dependents do not receive targeted, actionable, timely warning; they discover the change too late, through the wrong channel, or without enough detail to prepare, causing breakage, mistrust, unsafe adaptation, or coordination failure."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "A prior change produced surprise, missed deadlines, brittle migration, silent breakage, or claims that parties were informed when they were not realistically prepared."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 21, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-021", "ledger_sha256": "91a43e408f8849a0887979d25b17b9ad399b9052a3e7e98be91ec6258e76e657"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": [{"groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A merely anticipated future proposal or a rule movement that produces no unanticipated encounter is outside the exact definition, so it cannot preserve the candidate while falsifying the source.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Regulatory Surprise", "one_liner": "Name the venture failure in which a plan built on an assumed-stable rule environment is stranded when the rule moves, reframing that environment from a fixed constraint into a slow-moving but observable, monitorable variable.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:regulatory_surprise", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "regulatory_surprise"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "regulatory_surprise", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P028-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every complete regulatory-surprise instance includes a rule-environment change that occurs before and causes the unanticipated encounter. The broader venture-stranding details do not weaken those three obligations."}], "publication_role": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT_ONLY", "source_residual_occurrence_id": "r:dependency_aware_change_notification:b021_a03_c6", "unit": {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P028-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a completed earlier change rather than an anticipated future change.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A change occurred previously.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve surprise as the outcome without requiring any particular experiencer or affected-party role.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Surprise is the resulting outcome.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the prior-change-to-surprise causal direction.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The prior change produced the surprise.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "A prior change produced surprise.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A prior change caused surprise.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P028-C11-U1"}}, {"groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A visible versioned label change caught by historical comparison is not ground-truth drift as defined, because the exact record requires the definition movement to evade ordinary current-reference detectors.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Ground-Truth Drift", "one_liner": "The model-evaluation failure in which the operational definition of the correct answer drifts on a clock the monitoring apparatus cannot see, so metrics keep scoring against a moved target while the dashboards stay green — invisible because every detector consumes current ground truth as its reference.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:ground_truth_drift", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "ground_truth_drift"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "ground_truth_drift", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P028-C11-U4", "why_it_fits": "Definition movement is completed earlier, silently invalidates evaluation, and is not flagged because every detector consumes current truth. Timing, actual breakage, silence, and causal direction are all universal."}], "publication_role": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT_ONLY", "source_residual_occurrence_id": "r:dependency_aware_change_notification:b021_a03_c6", "unit": {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P028-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a completed earlier change rather than an anticipated future change.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A change occurred previously.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve actual breakage rather than risk of breakage alone.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Breakage is the resulting failure.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve absence of visible or timely indication of the breakage.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The breakage is silent.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the prior-change-to-silent-breakage causal direction.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The prior change produced the silent breakage.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "A prior change produced silent breakage.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A prior change caused breakage that remained silent.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P028-C11-U4"}}]}
{"archetype": {"name": "Dependency-Capture Exit Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:dependency_capture_exit_design", "slug": "dependency_capture_exit_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 1 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 1}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "An agent gains status, income, authority, identity, or access from being indispensable to a recurring problem and can covertly preserve, obscure, or reproduce that problem so the valued role remains necessary.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "An agent covertly sustains a problem because the status, income, authority, identity, or access attached to solving it depends on the problem's persistence."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "A role-holder covertly preserves the problem because its valued role and rewards would disappear after genuine resolution.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A role-holder covertly preserves the problem because its valued role and rewards would disappear after genuine resolution.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The target condition recurs across cases or domains rather than appearing as a one-off exception.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The target condition recurs across cases or domains rather than appearing as a one-off exception. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The target condition recurs across cases or domains rather than appearing as a one-off exception."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "The target condition recurs across cases or domains rather than appearing as a one-off exception."}, {"display_text": "Local workarounds do not expose the underlying structural relation.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Local workarounds do not expose the underlying structural relation. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Local workarounds do not expose the underlying structural relation."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "Local workarounds do not expose the underlying structural relation."}, {"display_text": "Consequential decisions depend on an assumption that is not yet explicit or validated.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Consequential decisions depend on an assumption that is not yet explicit or validated. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Consequential decisions depend on an assumption that is not yet explicit or validated."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Consequential decisions depend on an assumption that is not yet explicit or validated."}, {"display_text": "The system needs a reusable intervention with monitoring, exception handling, and revision.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: The system needs a reusable intervention with monitoring, exception handling, and revision. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The system needs a reusable intervention with monitoring, exception handling, and revision."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The system needs a reusable intervention with monitoring, exception handling, and revision."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 21, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-021", "ledger_sha256": "91a43e408f8849a0887979d25b17b9ad399b9052a3e7e98be91ec6258e76e657"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Dependency Concentration Control", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:dependency_concentration_control", "slug": "dependency_concentration_control"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 3, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 2, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 2, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 2 of 3 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system depends on external or internal providers, channels, teams, platforms, resources, regions, standards, or support paths. The dependency set appears plural, but effective reliance is unevenly distributed: one provider carries most demand, a small cluster shares a common upstream bottleneck, or nominal alternatives are correlated through the same infrastructure. Because the concentration is a structural property of the dependency distribution, internal defenses cannot fully compensate for an overweight provider or common-mode cluster.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A dependent system's apparently plural provider set is fragile because effective weight is concentrated on a few providers, shared upstream modes, or nominal substitutes that cannot carry the required load."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a dependent downstream system and a set of multiple upstream providers across which dependency weight is distributed.", "role_mapping": "System -> dependent system; listed alternatives -> provider set.", "slug": "dependency_distribution_concentration", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b021_a05_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system depends on external or internal providers, channels, teams, platforms, resources, regions, standards, or support paths. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The system relies on multiple providers, channels, platforms, regions, teams, resources, or support paths.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The system relies on multiple providers, channels, platforms, regions, teams, resources, or support paths.", "A system depends on external or internal providers, channels, teams, platforms, resources, regions, standards, or support paths."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Dependency Distribution Concentration", "one_liner": "How a system's dependency weight is distributed across providers — concentrated or spread — is a structural property that bounds its fragility independent of its own defenses.", "page_ref": "prime:dependency_distribution_concentration", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "System -> dependent system; listed alternatives -> provider set.", "slug": "dependency_distribution_concentration", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a dependent downstream system and a set of multiple upstream providers across which dependency weight is distributed."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The system relies on multiple providers, channels, platforms, regions, teams, resources, or support paths.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P028-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O9"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve providers or dependency sources rather than arbitrary elements.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Providers form the population being compared.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve concentration in a minority subset of providers.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The focal provider subset is small relative to the provider population.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a majority share concentrated in the small subset.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The small subset carries most of the selected dependency weight.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires most demand to fall on the small provider subset.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Demand is the concentrated dependency weight.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires most authority to reside in the small provider subset.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Authority is the concentrated dependency weight.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires most information to be carried by the small provider subset.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "Information is the concentrated dependency weight.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires most legitimacy to reside in the small provider subset.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "Legitimacy is the concentrated dependency weight.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires most capacity to reside in the small provider subset.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "Capacity is the concentrated dependency weight.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires most recovery leverage to reside in the small provider subset.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "Recovery leverage is the concentrated dependency weight.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "A small subset of providers carries most demand, authority, information, legitimacy, capacity, or recovery leverage.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A small provider subset carries most of one listed dependency weight.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P028-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime explicitly includes both concentrated and broadly spread dependency distributions; a valid instance need not have a top-heavy provider subset.", "slug": "dependency_distribution_concentration"}], "residual_id": "r:dependency_concentration_control:b021_a05_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b021_a05_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The dependency set appears plural, but effective reliance is unevenly distributed: one provider carries most demand, a small cluster shares a common upstream bottleneck, or nominal alternatives are correlated through the same infrastructure. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A small subset of providers carries most demand, authority, information, legitimacy, capacity, or recovery leverage.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A small subset of providers carries most demand, authority, information, legitimacy, capacity, or recovery leverage.", "The dependency set appears plural, but effective reliance is unevenly distributed: one provider carries most demand, a small cluster shares a common upstream bottleneck, or nominal alternatives are correlated through the same infrastructure."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A broad equal-share supplier base would falsify the source, but the exact record excludes it by requiring a heavily right-tailed distribution with one or two suppliers holding the majority share.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Supplier Concentration Risk", "one_liner": "Exposure that arises when a buyer's dependency for a critical input rests on so few suppliers that one node's disruption propagates downstream faster than alternatives can be qualified — a shape property of the dependency distribution, not of any supplier's performance.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:supplier_concentration_risk", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "supplier_concentration_risk"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "supplier_concentration_risk", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P028-C15-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact core universally fixes a minority supplier subset holding a majority of sourced volume. That is the demand branch of the source DNF, so no qualifier is needed."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A small subset of providers carries most demand, authority, information, legitimacy, capacity, or recovery leverage.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a dependent downstream system and a set of multiple upstream providers across which dependency weight is distributed.", "role_mapping": "System -> dependent system; listed alternatives -> provider set.", "slug": "dependency_distribution_concentration", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b021_a05_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system depends on external or internal providers, channels, teams, platforms, resources, regions, standards, or support paths. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The system relies on multiple providers, channels, platforms, regions, teams, resources, or support paths.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The system relies on multiple providers, channels, platforms, regions, teams, resources, or support paths.", "A system depends on external or internal providers, channels, teams, platforms, resources, regions, standards, or support paths."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Dependency Distribution Concentration", "one_liner": "How a system's dependency weight is distributed across providers — concentrated or spread — is a structural property that bounds its fragility independent of its own defenses.", "page_ref": "prime:dependency_distribution_concentration", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "System -> dependent system; listed alternatives -> provider set.", "slug": "dependency_distribution_concentration", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a dependent downstream system and a set of multiple upstream providers across which dependency weight is distributed."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The system relies on multiple providers, channels, platforms, regions, teams, resources, or support paths.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P029-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O9"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O10"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O11"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require a plural provider set rather than one provider with multiple attributes.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "More than one provider is present.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve apparent or formal separation among the providers.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The providers are nominally separate.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a common upstream relation among the provider roles.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The providers share an upstream dependency or failure locus.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires shared upstream infrastructure.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Upstream infrastructure is shared.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires common ownership of nominally separate providers.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Ownership is shared.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a shared geographic exposure.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "Geography is shared.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires shared upstream standards.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "Standards are shared.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires dependence on a shared labor pool.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "Labor pools are shared.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a shared funding source or exposure.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "Funding is shared.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires shared credential infrastructure or authority.", "obligation_id": "O10", "statement": "Credentials are shared.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a failure mode common to the nominal providers.", "obligation_id": "O11", "statement": "Failure modes are shared.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Nominally separate providers share upstream infrastructure, ownership, geography, standards, labor pools, funding, credentials, or failure modes.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Nominally separate providers share at least one listed upstream dependency or failure mode.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P029-C01-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime requires generic surface items coupled by a hidden driver, but it does not require those items to occupy the provider role of a downstream dependency network.", "slug": "apparent_variety_masks_shared_driver"}], "residual_id": "r:dependency_concentration_control:b021_a05_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b021_a05_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Nominally separate providers share upstream infrastructure, ownership, geography, standards, labor pools, funding, credentials, or failure modes. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Nominally separate providers share upstream infrastructure, ownership, geography, standards, labor pools, funding, credentials, or failure modes."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_SYNTHESIS", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Without the qualifier, a bank may be concentrated only in several unrelated large depositors, so no shared upstream geography or failure locus is necessary.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Deposit Concentration Risk", "one_liner": "Judge a bank's funding fragility by the correlation-adjusted effective depositor count rather than the headline number — coupled depositors collapse toward one bet, voiding the law-of-large-numbers smoothing a large base seems to guarantee.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:deposit_concentration_risk", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O3", "O6"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "shared_geographic_exposure", "predicate": "the correlation-generating cause is a shared geographic exposure", "rationale": "The retained context guard is one atomic, candidate-anchored branch selector and does not restate the source head or import a solution operation."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "deposit_concentration_risk"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "the correlation-generating cause is a shared geographic exposure"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "deposit_concentration_risk", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P029-C01-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record names geography as one correlation-generating cause. Selecting that named branch yields plural nominal funding providers coupled by a shared upstream geography without adding a second condition."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Nominally separate providers share upstream infrastructure, ownership, geography, standards, labor, funding, credentials, or failure modes.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a dependent downstream system and a set of multiple upstream providers across which dependency weight is distributed.", "role_mapping": "System -> dependent system; listed alternatives -> provider set.", "slug": "dependency_distribution_concentration", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b021_a05_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system depends on external or internal providers, channels, teams, platforms, resources, regions, standards, or support paths. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The system relies on multiple providers, channels, platforms, regions, teams, resources, or support paths.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The system relies on multiple providers, channels, platforms, regions, teams, resources, or support paths.", "A system depends on external or internal providers, channels, teams, platforms, resources, regions, standards, or support paths."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Dependency Distribution Concentration", "one_liner": "How a system's dependency weight is distributed across providers — concentrated or spread — is a structural property that bounds its fragility independent of its own defenses.", "page_ref": "prime:dependency_distribution_concentration", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "System -> dependent system; listed alternatives -> provider set.", "slug": "dependency_distribution_concentration", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a dependent downstream system and a set of multiple upstream providers across which dependency weight is distributed."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The system relies on multiple providers, channels, platforms, regions, teams, resources, or support paths.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P029-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve substitute paths rather than unrelated spare capacity.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Substitution paths are the proposed alternatives.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve nominal availability rather than total absence of substitutes.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The substitution paths exist nominally or on paper.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the focal concentrated-provider role.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A concentrated provider is the provider to be replaced.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve incapacity of the substitutes relative to a required demand.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The nominal substitution paths cannot meet a required demand of that provider.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires insufficient substitute load capacity.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The unmet demand is load absorption.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires inability to meet the provider's quality requirement.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The unmet demand is a quality requirement.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires inability to meet the provider's timing need.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The unmet demand is a timing need.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Substitution paths exist on paper but cannot absorb the load, quality requirement, or timing need of the concentrated provider.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Nominal substitution paths cannot meet at least one listed demand of the concentrated provider.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P029-C02-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A concentrated dependency distribution can have capable substitutes that have not yet received weight, and the prime does not require paper-only substitution paths.", "slug": "dependency_distribution_concentration"}], "residual_id": "r:dependency_concentration_control:b021_a05_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b021_a05_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Substitution paths exist on paper but cannot absorb the load, quality requirement, or timing need of the concentrated provider. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Substitution paths exist on paper but cannot absorb the load, quality requirement, or timing need of the concentrated provider."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A concentrated dependency distribution can have capable substitutes that have not yet received weight, and the prime does not require paper-only substitution paths.", "slug": "dependency_distribution_concentration"}], "normalized_requirement": "Nominal substitution paths cannot absorb the load, quality requirement, or timing need of the concentrated provider.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Nominal substitution paths cannot absorb the load, quality requirement, or timing need of the concentrated provider.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Dependency lists exist, but their relative weights, criticality, switching difficulty, or recovery times are not measured together.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Efficiency and specialization pull dependency weight toward the strongest, cheapest, most convenient, or most familiar provider, while resilience requires distributed, independent, and switchable exposure. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Dependency lists exist, but their relative weights, criticality, switching difficulty, or recovery times are not measured together. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Dependency lists exist, but their relative weights, criticality, switching difficulty, or recovery times are not measured together.", "Efficiency and specialization pull dependency weight toward the strongest, cheapest, most convenient, or most familiar provider, while resilience requires distributed, independent, and switchable exposure."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "Dependency lists exist, but their relative weights, criticality, switching difficulty, or recovery times are not measured together."}, {"display_text": "Decision makers treat the count of alternatives as equivalent to actual independent distribution.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Decision makers treat the count of alternatives as equivalent to actual independent distribution. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Decision makers treat the count of alternatives as equivalent to actual independent distribution."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Decision makers treat the count of alternatives as equivalent to actual independent distribution."}, {"display_text": "The system’s own defenses assume that provider failure is local rather than distribution-dominating.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Because the concentration is a structural property of the dependency distribution, internal defenses cannot fully compensate for an overweight provider or common-mode cluster. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The system’s own defenses assume that provider failure is local rather than distribution-dominating. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The system’s own defenses assume that provider failure is local rather than distribution-dominating.", "Because the concentration is a structural property of the dependency distribution, internal defenses cannot fully compensate for an overweight provider or common-mode cluster."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "The system’s own defenses assume that provider failure is local rather than distribution-dominating."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 21, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-021", "ledger_sha256": "91a43e408f8849a0887979d25b17b9ad399b9052a3e7e98be91ec6258e76e657"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Dependency Exposure", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:dependency_exposure", "slug": "dependency_exposure"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 5, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 2, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 5 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is false independence. The focal system is treated as if it can be understood alone, but its real behavior depends on hidden relations to other actors, resources, components, conditions, or assumptions. The hidden relation may be technical, social, contractual, logistical, legal, data-based, cognitive, or environmental.\n\nThis produces characteristic failures. A software team removes a service and discovers that a legacy report still calls it. A public agency announces a policy whose local implementation depends on county staffing that does not exist. A manufacturer thinks it has many products but later discovers they share one fragile supplier. A hospital process appears standardized but depends on one experienced coordinator’s informal knowledge. A model output seems automated but depends on an upstream data refresh and an undocumented imputation rule.\n\nThe root tension is that dependency visibility is valuable but costly and potentially sensitive. Too little exposure creates fragility and surprise. Too much exposure can create mapping burden, false confidence, security risk, blame, or disclosure of vulnerable human labor. The archetype works only when exposure is scoped, evidenced, and connected to action.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system appears independent or stable while an unseen directed dependency with a specifiable failure mode can disrupt its outcome."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a hidden common driver that couples visibly distinct items while ordinary variation masks their realized dependence.", "role_mapping": "Hidden driver -> hidden coupling; surface multiplicity -> apparent independence.", "slug": "apparent_variety_masks_shared_driver", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b021_a06_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Hidden coupling. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["hidden_coupling"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Apparent Variety Masks Shared Driver", "one_liner": "Surface multiplicity overstates true independence when a hidden common driver couples the items.", "page_ref": "prime:apparent_variety_masks_shared_driver", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Hidden driver -> hidden coupling; surface multiplicity -> apparent independence.", "slug": "apparent_variety_masks_shared_driver", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a hidden common driver that couples visibly distinct items while ordinary variation masks their realized dependence."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A coupling relation is hidden.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The hidden or opaque relation is a directed dependency whose relied-on element has a specifiable disruptive failure mode.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The hidden or opaque relation is a directed dependency whose relied-on element has a specifiable disruptive failure mode.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's invariant is the gap between perceived and realized independence when surface variety shares an upstream driver.", "role_mapping": "False independence -> perceived-realized gap; elements -> coupled surface items.", "slug": "apparent_variety_masks_shared_driver", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b021_a06_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: False independence. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["false_independence"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Apparent Variety Masks Shared Driver", "one_liner": "Surface multiplicity overstates true independence when a hidden common driver couples the items.", "page_ref": "prime:apparent_variety_masks_shared_driver", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "False independence -> perceived-realized gap; elements -> coupled surface items.", "slug": "apparent_variety_masks_shared_driver", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's invariant is the gap between perceived and realized independence when surface variety shares an upstream driver."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Elements are falsely treated as independent.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The hidden or opaque relation is a directed dependency whose relied-on element has a specifiable disruptive failure mode.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The hidden or opaque relation is a directed dependency whose relied-on element has a specifiable disruptive failure mode.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P029-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a dependency relation rather than an unrelated hidden object.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A dependency relation is the focal object.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require opacity of the focal relation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The dependency relation is opaque.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires the opaque relation to be in a supply chain.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The opaque dependency is a supply-chain relation.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires the opaque relation to involve a vendor.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The opaque dependency is a vendor relation.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "A supply chain or vendor relation is opaque.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A listed dependency relation is opaque.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P029-C05-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The hidden driver can couple measurements, claims, assets, or labels with no supply-chain or vendor roles.", "slug": "apparent_variety_masks_shared_driver"}], "residual_id": "r:dependency_exposure:b021_a06_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b021_a06_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Supply chain or vendor opacity. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["supply_chain_or_vendor_opacity"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Without branch selection, the missing complement could instead be charging infrastructure, repair networks, or user skill and therefore need be neither supply-chain nor vendor dependency.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Ecosystem Mismatch", "one_liner": "Explain why a technically sound innovation stalls on deployment not by a flaw in the artifact but by the absence of one specific complementary asset its operating context tacitly required — leaving it complete-but-functionally-blocked.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:ecosystem_mismatch", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O3"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "required_complement_is_supplier_capacity", "predicate": "the required complementary asset is supplier capacity", "rationale": "The retained context guard is one atomic, candidate-anchored branch selector and does not restate the source head or import a solution operation."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "ecosystem_mismatch"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "the required complementary asset is supplier capacity"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "ecosystem_mismatch", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P029-C05-U1", "why_it_fits": "Opacity and an actual complementary dependency are direct. One candidate-anchored selector narrows the enumerated complement to supplier capacity, satisfying the supply-chain branch."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A supply chain or vendor relation is opaque.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The hidden or opaque relation is a directed dependency whose relied-on element has a specifiable disruptive failure mode.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The hidden or opaque relation is a directed dependency whose relied-on element has a specifiable disruptive failure mode.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P029-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an assumption rather than a fact, dependency, or component.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An assumption is the focal object.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require the assumption to support a consequential system relation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The assumption is load-bearing for the system or outcome.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve fragility rather than mere uncertainty or lack of proof.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The load-bearing assumption is fragile.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "A load-bearing assumption is fragile.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A load-bearing assumption is fragile.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P029-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An assumption is unproven and load-bearing but can be robust, conservative, or repeatedly validated; fragility is not mandatory.", "slug": "assumption"}], "residual_id": "r:dependency_exposure:b021_a06_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b021_a06_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Assumption fragility. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["assumption_fragility"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "If the topology were demonstrably homogeneous at the relevant scale, the failed uniformity assumption central to this fallacy would disappear.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Fallacy of Homogeneous Networks", "one_liner": "The implicit assumption that all nodes, links, OSes, versions, and configs across a distributed deployment are uniform — a missing degree of freedom in the system's model of its substrate that stays latent until deployment crosses a boundary where the uniformity breaks.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:fallacy_of_homogeneous_networks", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "fallacy_of_homogeneous_networks"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "fallacy_of_homogeneous_networks", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P029-C06-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact candidate is defined by a load-bearing uniformity assumption that fails at heterogeneous boundaries, so fragility is necessary rather than merely plausible."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A load-bearing assumption is fragile.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The hidden or opaque relation is a directed dependency whose relied-on element has a specifiable disruptive failure mode.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The hidden or opaque relation is a directed dependency whose relied-on element has a specifiable disruptive failure mode.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B5", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P029-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a dependency relation as the object needing ownership.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A dependency is the focal object.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an actual dependency rather than a proposed or hypothetical one.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The dependency exists.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve ownership or a strict accountability-owner subtype.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "An owner is the missing accountability role.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require absence or lack of clarity of the ownership relation.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "No clear owner is assigned to the dependency.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "A dependency exists without a clear owner.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A dependency lacks a clear owner.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P029-C08-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A dependency can have explicit ownership and accountability; the directed reliance relation does not entail an ownership gap.", "slug": "dependency"}], "residual_id": "r:dependency_exposure:b021_a06_c7", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b021_a06_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Unowned dependency. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["unowned_dependency"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A dependency can have explicit ownership and accountability; the directed reliance relation does not entail an ownership gap.", "slug": "dependency"}], "normalized_requirement": "A dependency exists without a clear owner.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A dependency exists without a clear owner.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The hidden or opaque relation is a directed dependency whose relied-on element has a specifiable disruptive failure mode.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The hidden or opaque relation is a directed dependency whose relied-on element has a specifiable disruptive failure mode.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 5", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "DISJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Change impact uncertainty.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source states: Change impact uncertainty. The normalized contextual consideration is: Change impact uncertainty. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["change_impact_uncertainty"]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "change_impact_uncertainty"}, {"display_text": "Single point of failure suspicion.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source states: Single point of failure suspicion. The normalized contextual consideration is: Single point of failure suspicion. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["single_point_of_failure_suspicion"]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "single_point_of_failure_suspicion"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 21, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-021", "ledger_sha256": "91a43e408f8849a0887979d25b17b9ad399b9052a3e7e98be91ec6258e76e657"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": [{"groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "If the effect were known without identification uncertainty, the candidate would no longer present the causal-inference problem described by its exact record.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Causal Inference", "one_liner": "Infer the effect of changing X on Y from data by fixing a causal estimand and defending an identification design or assumption that separates that effect from noncausal association, then quantify its uncertainty and scope.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:causal_inference", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "causal_inference"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "causal_inference", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P029-C07-U1", "why_it_fits": "The candidate directly concerns uncertainty about the impact attributable to a change. Because the source unit is supporting context, publication must use supporting-grounding projection."}], "publication_role": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT_ONLY", "source_residual_occurrence_id": "r:dependency_exposure:b021_a06_c5", "unit": {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P029-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a change as the focal event.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A change is the event whose impact is assessed.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the change-to-impact relation rather than unrelated uncertainty.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "An impact is attributable to the change.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require uncertainty about the impact, not merely possible variation in the change.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The change's impact is epistemically uncertain.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "The impact of a change is uncertain.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "The impact attributable to a change is uncertain.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P029-C07-U1"}}]}
{"archetype": {"name": "Dependency Ordering", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:dependency_ordering", "slug": "dependency_ordering"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 2, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is that the system contains prerequisite relations, but work proceeds as though those relations were absent, obvious, or optional. A dependent action begins before its required predecessor state exists. The immediate result may look like progress, but the structural result is invalid work: a deployment without rollback readiness, a treatment without diagnostic prerequisites, a legal action without notice, a course without prerequisite mastery, or an assembly step before material preparation.\n\nThis failure often appears as late discovery. People find the missing prerequisite only after downstream work has started. By then, the system has already spent effort in the wrong state.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A process has prerequisite relations whose required temporal order is violated or whose preconditions are attempted before they exist."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P029-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O9"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O10"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an earlier work activity that produces the dependency object.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Earlier work is the producing activity.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve later work as the consumer of the same object.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Later work is the consuming activity.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve production by the earlier activity.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Earlier work produces the dependency object.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve consumption or required use of the same produced object.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Later work consumes the object produced by earlier work.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the earlier-to-later temporal direction.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The producing work is earlier than the consuming work.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires an output produced by earlier work.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The consumed product is an output.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a permission produced or granted by earlier work.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The consumed product is a permission.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a resource produced or made available by earlier work.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The consumed product is a resource.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires knowledge produced by earlier work.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "The consumed product is knowledge.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a state established by earlier work.", "obligation_id": "O10", "statement": "The consumed product is a state.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Later work consumes outputs, permissions, resources, knowledge, or states produced by earlier work.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Later work consumes a listed product produced by earlier work.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P029-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Dependency can be logical, semantic, contractual, compatibility-based, or presence-based and need not relate later work to an earlier-produced output.", "slug": "dependency"}], "residual_id": "r:dependency_ordering:b021_a07_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b021_a07_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use Dependency Ordering when premature action creates invalid states, rework, safety risk, blocked downstream work, or procedural failure. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Later work consumes outputs, permissions, resources, knowledge, or states produced by earlier work.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Later work consumes outputs, permissions, resources, knowledge, or states produced by earlier work.", "Use Dependency Ordering when premature action creates invalid states, rework, safety risk, blocked downstream work, or procedural failure."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A pipeline whose later phase did not consume an earlier phase's representation would not preserve the candidate's typed producer-consumer phase interfaces.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Compiler", "one_liner": "Translate a fully specified source language ahead of time into a semantically equivalent target form through a pipeline of formal-interface phases, so the whole program can be globally analysed and optimised once while its observable behaviour is guaranteed preserved.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:compiler", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "compiler"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "compiler", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P029-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "The formal pipeline necessarily has ordered work phases connected by the same produced-and-consumed output, satisfying the output branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "If no plan artifact preceded execution, the candidate's defining gap between a coarse plan and its enactment could not exist.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Plan-Execute Gap", "one_liner": "The pathology in which a coarse-grained planning artefact cannot be enacted because the execution layer faces binding fine-grained constraints the planning model never represented — so the fix is constraint propagation and feedback, never a better forecast.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:plan_execute_gap", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "plan_execute_gap"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "plan_execute_gap", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P029-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "The candidate necessarily contains earlier plan-producing work and later plan-consuming execution work, preserving the output branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Detailed planning performed without a prior operational approach would violate the candidate's defining pre-planning phase rather than instantiate it.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Operational Design", "one_liner": "Insert a structured pre-planning phase that characterises the environment, frames the problem, and develops a revisable operational approach before any detailed plan, so a force does not solve the wrong problem with high precision.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:operational_design", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "operational_design"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "operational_design", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P029-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact workflow explicitly places approach-producing design before approach-consuming detailed planning, satisfying the output branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Tactics chosen without prior incident objectives would not preserve the candidate's objective-led operational cadence.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Incident Objectives", "one_liner": "The short ordered list of specific, measurable, owned, time-bounded aims an Incident Commander sets each operational period, re-aiming the response periodically under uncertainty and driving the planning cycle's assignments, tactics, and period-end verification.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:incident_objectives", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "incident_objectives"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "incident_objectives", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P029-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "The objectives are a produced planning output that necessarily precedes and guides later planning or tactics, satisfying the output branch."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Later work consumes outputs, permissions, resources, knowledge, or states produced by earlier work.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P029-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve dependencies rather than arbitrary undocumented information.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Dependencies are the focal represented objects.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require the dependency relations to lack explicit representation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The dependencies are implicit rather than explicitly represented.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Dependencies are implicit.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Dependencies are implicit rather than explicitly represented.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P029-C10-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P029-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve dependencies rather than arbitrary distributed information.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Dependencies are the focal represented objects.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve dispersion of dependency representation rather than one centralized record.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Representation of the dependencies is distributed across multiple holders.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires dependency knowledge or representation to be distributed across people.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "People are the holders across whom dependency representation is distributed.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires dependency representation to be distributed across tools.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Tools are the holders across which dependency representation is distributed.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Dependencies are distributed across people or tools.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Dependency representation is distributed across one listed holder type.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P029-C10-U2"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P029-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve dependency relations as the content retained in memory.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Dependencies are the objects being remembered.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve memory as the representation mechanism for the dependencies.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The dependencies are retained through memory.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve informal remembrance rather than a formal authoritative record.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The memory representation is informal.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Dependencies are remembered informally.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Dependencies are retained in informal memory.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P029-C10-U3"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime's five roles can be explicit in a documented graph and do not require distributed or informal representation.", "slug": "dependency"}], "residual_id": "r:dependency_ordering:b021_a07_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b021_a07_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The pattern is especially strong when prerequisites cross team boundaries, disciplines, jurisdictions, tools, or physical processes, because no single actor can reliably remember all dependencies. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Dependencies are implicit, distributed across people or tools, or remembered informally.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Dependencies are implicit, distributed across people or tools, or remembered informally.", "The pattern is especially strong when prerequisites cross team boundaries, disciplines, jurisdictions, tools, or physical processes, because no single actor can reliably remember all dependencies."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 3, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 3}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime's five roles can be explicit in a documented graph and do not require distributed or informal representation.", "slug": "dependency"}], "normalized_requirement": "Dependencies are implicit, distributed across people or tools, or remembered informally.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 3 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Dependencies are implicit, distributed across people or tools, or remembered informally.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P029-C11", "dnf": [], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [], "predicate": "Multiple valid orders may exist.", "resolution": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RESIDUAL", "semantic_scope": "NON_ABSTRACTION", "structural_head": "Multiple valid orders may exist.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P029-C11-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P029-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve constraints on order rather than generic requirements.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Order constraints are the focal rules.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve temporal precedence rather than logical or spatial ordering alone.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The constraints govern temporal order.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require one or more hard temporal constraints.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "At least one temporal order constraint is present.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve mandatory precedence rather than a preference or default ordering.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The temporal constraint is non-negotiable.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "Some temporal order constraints are non-negotiable.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Some temporal order constraints are non-negotiable.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P029-C11-U2"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A dependency can concern non-temporal presence or compatibility, and even a temporal dependency graph can impose a unique total order rather than multiple valid orders.", "slug": "dependency"}], "residual_id": "r:dependency_ordering:b021_a07_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b021_a07_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Multiple valid orders may exist, but some order constraints are non-negotiable. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Multiple valid orders may exist, but some order constraints are non-negotiable."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Activation before any condition is laid down leaves no pre-staged weakness to activate and therefore is not a latent condition.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Latent Condition", "one_liner": "Name the dormant, pre-staged weakness in a system's defence layers — laid down by upstream decisions far from the sharp end — that produces no harm until an operational circumstance aligns it with an active failure to complete a path to an accident.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:latent_condition", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "latent_condition"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "latent_condition", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P029-C11-U2", "why_it_fits": "The exact candidate exposes at least one temporal precedence rule that cannot be reversed while preserving candidate identity, so all four obligations are directly entailed."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Tactics formed before the objectives that are supposed to direct them do not instantiate the objective-led cadence in the exact candidate.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Incident Objectives", "one_liner": "The short ordered list of specific, measurable, owned, time-bounded aims an Incident Commander sets each operational period, re-aiming the response periodically under uncertainty and driving the planning cycle's assignments, tactics, and period-end verification.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:incident_objectives", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "incident_objectives"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "incident_objectives", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P029-C11-U2", "why_it_fits": "The exact candidate exposes at least one temporal precedence rule that cannot be reversed while preserving candidate identity, so all four obligations are directly entailed."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A payoff appearing before its setup cannot pay off that setup and therefore fails the candidate's defining relation.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Setup and Payoff", "one_liner": "Place material early that a later development activates, so the payoff feels earned and the setup gains retrospective necessity; the relation requires both precedence and a relevant return.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:setup_and_payoff", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "setup_and_payoff"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "setup_and_payoff", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P029-C11-U2", "why_it_fits": "The exact candidate exposes at least one temporal precedence rule that cannot be reversed while preserving candidate identity, so all four obligations are directly entailed."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Execution cannot fail to enact a plan that has not yet been produced, so reversal destroys the candidate.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Plan-Execute Gap", "one_liner": "The pathology in which a coarse-grained planning artefact cannot be enacted because the execution layer faces binding fine-grained constraints the planning model never represented — so the fix is constraint propagation and feedback, never a better forecast.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:plan_execute_gap", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "plan_execute_gap"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "plan_execute_gap", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P029-C11-U2", "why_it_fits": "The exact candidate exposes at least one temporal precedence rule that cannot be reversed while preserving candidate identity, so all four obligations are directly entailed."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "If substantial scaling occurs only after repeatable fit is established, the venture is not scaling before fit.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Scale-Before-Fit", "one_liner": "Diagnose a venture's failure as one of ordering — committing substantial growth investment before demonstrating repeatable, unsubsidised demand — by asking whether the evidence at the moment of commitment justified the cost base it locked in.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:scale_before_fit", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "scale_before_fit"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "scale_before_fit", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P029-C11-U2", "why_it_fits": "The exact candidate exposes at least one temporal precedence rule that cannot be reversed while preserving candidate identity, so all four obligations are directly entailed."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Detailed planning first, followed by environment framing, reverses the defining pre-planning architecture and is not this candidate.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Operational Design", "one_liner": "Insert a structured pre-planning phase that characterises the environment, frames the problem, and develops a revisable operational approach before any detailed plan, so a force does not solve the wrong problem with high precision.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:operational_design", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "operational_design"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "operational_design", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P029-C11-U2", "why_it_fits": "The exact candidate exposes at least one temporal precedence rule that cannot be reversed while preserving candidate identity, so all four obligations are directly entailed."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Fulfillment before the order is accepted leaves no backordered claim and therefore changes the arrangement.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Backorder", "one_liner": "The fulfilment arrangement in which an order is accepted as a binding obligation despite a stock-out, becoming a queued claim against future supply tracked in a visible ledger and clocked against an estimated resupply, rather than being refused as a lost sale.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:backorder", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "backorder"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "backorder", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P029-C11-U2", "why_it_fits": "The exact candidate exposes at least one temporal precedence rule that cannot be reversed while preserving candidate identity, so all four obligations are directly entailed."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Applying an operator while its required precondition remains false violates the candidate's operator semantics.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Means-End Analysis", "one_liner": "A greedy problem-solving heuristic that repeatedly finds the most significant difference between the current and goal states, applies the operator that most reduces it, and recurses on any unmet preconditions as sub-goals.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:means_end_analysis", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "means_end_analysis"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "means_end_analysis", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P029-C11-U2", "why_it_fits": "The exact candidate exposes at least one temporal precedence rule that cannot be reversed while preserving candidate identity, so all four obligations are directly entailed."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Combining facets only at query time is postcoordination, the expressly distinguished alternative rather than precoordinated heading.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Precoordinated Heading", "one_liner": "Fuse topic, place, period, and form into one canonical subject string at indexing time so users retrieve by matching a whole browsable label, trading expressiveness and easy schema evolution for that browsability.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:precoordinated_heading", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "precoordinated_heading"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "precoordinated_heading", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P029-C11-U2", "why_it_fits": "The exact candidate exposes at least one temporal precedence rule that cannot be reversed while preserving candidate identity, so all four obligations are directly entailed."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Producing only after receipt of a customer order moves the decoupling point and becomes make-to-order.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Make-to-Stock", "one_liner": "Produce finished goods ahead of any order against an aggregate forecast, placing the decoupling point as far downstream as it will go, so customer wait collapses to the order-to-pick interval at the price of holding cost and a binding forecast bet.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:make_to_stock", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "make_to_stock"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "make_to_stock", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P029-C11-U2", "why_it_fits": "The exact candidate exposes at least one temporal precedence rule that cannot be reversed while preserving candidate identity, so all four obligations are directly entailed."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A consuming phase that runs before its input representation exists cannot preserve the candidate's formal phase pipeline.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Compiler", "one_liner": "Translate a fully specified source language ahead of time into a semantically equivalent target form through a pipeline of formal-interface phases, so the whole program can be globally analysed and optimised once while its observable behaviour is guaranteed preserved.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:compiler", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "compiler"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "compiler", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P029-C11-U2", "why_it_fits": "The exact candidate exposes at least one temporal precedence rule that cannot be reversed while preserving candidate identity, so all four obligations are directly entailed."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Multiple valid orders may exist, but some temporal order constraints are non-negotiable.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "A step is actually attempted before a mandatory prerequisite or precondition is satisfied.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A step is actually attempted before a mandatory prerequisite or precondition is satisfied.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Failed steps cause cascading rework, unsafe states, or blocked downstream work.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use Dependency Ordering when premature action creates invalid states, rework, safety risk, blocked downstream work, or procedural failure. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Failed steps cause cascading rework, unsafe states, or blocked downstream work. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Failed steps cause cascading rework, unsafe states, or blocked downstream work.", "Use Dependency Ordering when premature action creates invalid states, rework, safety risk, blocked downstream work, or procedural failure."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Failed steps cause cascading rework, unsafe states, or blocked downstream work."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 21, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-021", "ledger_sha256": "91a43e408f8849a0887979d25b17b9ad399b9052a3e7e98be91ec6258e76e657"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": [{"groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_GUARDED_EQUIVALENT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Without branch selection, a null dereference may silently yield garbage or corrupt state while execution continues, so blocked downstream work is not universal.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Null dereference", "one_liner": "The failure where code operates on a reference under the unstated assumption that the object exists, while the reference is in fact absent — so the defect is the missing existence-precondition check, not the absence itself.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:null_dereference", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O6"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "null_dereference_runtime_crash_or_exception", "predicate": "the null dereference takes the crash-or-exception runtime branch", "rationale": "The retained context guard is one atomic, candidate-anchored branch selector and does not restate the source head or import a solution operation."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "null_dereference"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "the null dereference takes the crash-or-exception runtime branch"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "null_dereference", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P029-C12-U1", "why_it_fits": "The candidate directly supplies the failed step and causal fault. One named runtime-outcome branch supplies the blocked-downstream consequence required by O6."}], "publication_role": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT_ONLY", "source_residual_occurrence_id": "r:dependency_ordering:b021_a07_c4", "unit": {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P029-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a process step or strict subtype as the source event.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A process step is the causal source.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require step failure rather than mere completion or delay.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The source step has failed.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve directed causation from the failed step to the effect.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The failed step causes the listed consequence.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires rework that propagates beyond the failed step.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The consequence is cascading rework.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires the failed step to cause an unsafe state.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The consequence is an unsafe state.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires downstream work to be blocked by the failed step.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The consequence is blocked downstream work.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Failed steps cause cascading rework, unsafe states, or blocked downstream work.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Failed steps cause at least one listed downstream consequence.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P029-C12-U1"}}]}
{"archetype": {"name": "Design-Principle Extraction and Reapplication", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:design_principle_extraction_and_reapplication", "slug": "design_principle_extraction_and_reapplication"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 5 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A designer, organization, researcher, or institution sees an effective external artifact or practice and wants to reuse its value, but the source's working logic is entangled with surface features, local constraints, tacit know-how, historical accidents, materials, scale, incentives, or context. Direct copying risks cargo-cult imitation, while ignoring the source wastes a transferable lesson.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "An effective external source and a materially different target share potentially transferable logic, but the source mechanism is entangled with surface form, tacit choices, and local constraints so direct copying can fail."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Transfer can be negative, neutral, or based on ordinary source mastery; the prime does not require unusually strong source performance or a judgment that it is worth copying.", "slug": "transfer_of_learning"}], "residual_id": "r:design_principle_extraction_and_reapplication:b021_a08_c1", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b021_a08_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A source artifact, system, organism, process, competitor feature, or institutional practice performs unusually well and appears worth learning from. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A source artifact, system, organism, process, competitor feature, or institutional practice performs unusually well and appears worth learning from."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Transfer can be negative, neutral, or based on ordinary source mastery; the prime does not require unusually strong source performance or a judgment that it is worth copying.", "slug": "transfer_of_learning"}], "normalized_requirement": "A source artifact, system, organism, process, feature, or practice performs unusually well and appears worth learning from.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A source artifact, system, organism, process, feature, or practice performs unusually well and appears worth learning from.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a source task or context in which learning occurred and a specifiably different target task or context in which prior learning is applied.", "role_mapping": "Source context -> training context; receiving context -> different target context.", "slug": "transfer_of_learning", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b021_a08_c2a", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The receiving context differs from the source context in scale, users, materials, incentives, regulation, culture, climate, data, infrastructure, or organizational maturity. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The receiving context differs from the source context in scale, users, materials, incentives, regulation, culture, climate, data, infrastructure, or organizational maturity."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Transfer of Learning", "one_liner": "Apply knowledge across contexts.", "page_ref": "prime:transfer_of_learning", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source context -> training context; receiving context -> different target context.", "slug": "transfer_of_learning", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a source task or context in which learning occurred and a specifiably different target task or context in which prior learning is applied."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The receiving context differs from the source context.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P029-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O9"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O10"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O11"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O12"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O13"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the source or originating context.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A source context is one comparison role.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the target or receiving context as distinct from the source.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A receiving context is the other comparison role.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a source-target difference rather than mere contextual description.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The receiving context differs from the source context.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a scale difference.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The contexts differ in scale.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a difference in users or user population.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The contexts differ in users.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a material or substrate difference.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The contexts differ in materials.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires an incentive-structure difference.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The contexts differ in incentives.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a regulatory difference.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The contexts differ in regulation.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a cultural difference.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "The contexts differ in culture.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a climate difference.", "obligation_id": "O10", "statement": "The contexts differ in climate.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a data difference.", "obligation_id": "O11", "statement": "The contexts differ in data.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires an infrastructure difference.", "obligation_id": "O12", "statement": "The contexts differ in infrastructure.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires an organizational-maturity difference.", "obligation_id": "O13", "statement": "The contexts differ in organizational maturity.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "The receiving context differs from the source context in scale, users, materials, incentives, regulation, culture, climate, data, infrastructure, or organizational maturity.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "The receiving context differs from the source context in at least one listed dimension.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P029-C13-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The target can differ only in task demand or another surface feature outside the enumerated design-context dimensions.", "slug": "transfer_of_learning"}], "residual_id": "r:design_principle_extraction_and_reapplication:b021_a08_c2b", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b021_a08_c2b", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The receiving context differs from the source context in scale, users, materials, incentives, regulation, culture, climate, data, infrastructure, or organizational maturity. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The receiving context differs from the source context in scale, users, materials, incentives, regulation, culture, climate, data, infrastructure, or organizational maturity."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The target can differ only in task demand or another surface feature outside the enumerated design-context dimensions.", "slug": "transfer_of_learning"}], "normalized_requirement": "The source-target difference lies in scale, users, materials, incentives, regulation, culture, climate, data, infrastructure, or organizational maturity.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The source-target difference lies in scale, users, materials, incentives, regulation, culture, climate, data, infrastructure, or organizational maturity.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Abstraction can preserve a known invariant from particulars without any high-performing source, copying temptation, or uncertainty about causal performance.", "slug": "abstraction"}], "residual_id": "r:design_principle_extraction_and_reapplication:b021_a08_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b021_a08_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The visible source form is tempting to copy, but it is unclear which feature actually produces the desirable performance. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The visible source form is tempting to copy, but it is unclear which feature actually produces the desirable performance."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Abstraction can preserve a known invariant from particulars without any high-performing source, copying temptation, or uncertainty about causal performance.", "slug": "abstraction"}], "normalized_requirement": "Visible source form is tempting to copy while the feature producing desirable performance is unclear.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Visible source form is tempting to copy while the feature producing desirable performance is unclear.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P029-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a source design, implementation, or strict subtype as the containing object.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A source design is the object containing the element.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve documentation as the relevant explicit representation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Documentation is the representation in which the element is absent.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve actual inclusion of the element in the source.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The source contains the design-logic element.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve documentary non-explicitness of the same element.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The contained element is not explicit in documentation.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a tacit source decision.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The undocumented element is a tacit decision.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a hidden source tradeoff.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The undocumented element is a hidden tradeoff.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires an undocumented optimization priority.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The undocumented element is an optimization priority.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "The source includes tacit decisions, hidden tradeoffs, or optimization priorities that are not explicit in documentation.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "The source contains at least one listed design-logic element that is not explicit in documentation.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P029-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Transfer can proceed when source principles and procedures are completely explicit; tacit or undocumented tradeoffs are not mandatory.", "slug": "transfer_of_learning"}], "residual_id": "r:design_principle_extraction_and_reapplication:b021_a08_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b021_a08_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The source includes tacit decisions, hidden tradeoffs, or optimization priorities that are not explicit in documentation. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The source includes tacit decisions, hidden tradeoffs, or optimization priorities that are not explicit in documentation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Transfer can proceed when source principles and procedures are completely explicit; tacit or undocumented tradeoffs are not mandatory.", "slug": "transfer_of_learning"}], "normalized_requirement": "The source includes tacit decisions, hidden tradeoffs, or optimization priorities absent from documentation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The source includes tacit decisions, hidden tradeoffs, or optimization priorities absent from documentation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Stakeholders want to adapt a best practice, benchmark, biomimetic pattern, design precedent, or open-source implementation to a new use case.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A designer, organization, researcher, or institution sees an effective external artifact or practice and wants to reuse its value, but the source's working logic is entangled with surface features, local constraints, tacit know-how, historical accidents, materials, scale, incentives, or context. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: Stakeholders want to adapt a best practice, benchmark, biomimetic pattern, design precedent, or open-source implementation to a new use case. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders want to adapt a best practice, benchmark, biomimetic pattern, design precedent, or open-source implementation to a new use case.", "A designer, organization, researcher, or institution sees an effective external artifact or practice and wants to reuse its value, but the source's working logic is entangled with surface features, local constraints, tacit know-how, historical accidents, materials, scale, incentives, or context."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Stakeholders want to adapt a best practice, benchmark, biomimetic pattern, design precedent, or open-source implementation to a new use case."}, {"display_text": "A team must preserve the source's functional logic while changing implementation details to fit target constraints.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The archetype manages this by extracting a testable design principle and then re-grounding it in target-context constraints. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: A team must preserve the source's functional logic while changing implementation details to fit target constraints. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A team must preserve the source's functional logic while changing implementation details to fit target constraints.", "The archetype manages this by extracting a testable design principle and then re-grounding it in target-context constraints."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "A team must preserve the source's functional logic while changing implementation details to fit target constraints."}, {"display_text": "Prior copying attempts reproduced the appearance of a source but failed to reproduce its benefits.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Direct copying risks cargo-cult imitation, while ignoring the source wastes a transferable lesson. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Prior copying attempts reproduced the appearance of a source but failed to reproduce its benefits. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Prior copying attempts reproduced the appearance of a source but failed to reproduce its benefits.", "Direct copying risks cargo-cult imitation, while ignoring the source wastes a transferable lesson."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "Prior copying attempts reproduced the appearance of a source but failed to reproduce its benefits."}, {"display_text": "A learning or design process needs a disciplined bridge between observation, abstraction, adaptation, and validation.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: A learning or design process needs a disciplined bridge between observation, abstraction, adaptation, and validation. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A learning or design process needs a disciplined bridge between observation, abstraction, adaptation, and validation."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 8, "text": "A learning or design process needs a disciplined bridge between observation, abstraction, adaptation, and validation."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 21, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-021", "ledger_sha256": "91a43e408f8849a0887979d25b17b9ad399b9052a3e7e98be91ec6258e76e657"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Deterioration Monitoring", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:deterioration_monitoring", "slug": "deterioration_monitoring"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is that gradual decline is locally tolerable and globally dangerous. Each defect, delay, shortcut, exception, missed upkeep action, or stale record may seem minor. Over time, the accumulation changes the system's condition. Because no single event feels decisive, actors normalize the new lower standard until repair becomes expensive or failure becomes unavoidable.\n\nDeterioration is also politically and cognitively easy to ignore. A weak signal competes poorly against urgent work. A trend line is less dramatic than a crisis. A maintenance need is easy to defer when the system still functions today. The archetype exists to counter that bias toward waiting.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Sub-threshold degradation accumulates gradually and is easy to overlook until a costly or hard-to-reverse failure threshold is approached."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires sub-threshold stressors and incremental damage to accumulate slowly before a latent failure threshold is crossed.", "role_mapping": "Gradual degradation -> incremental damage accumulation.", "slug": "gradual_deterioration", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime requires systematic continuous loss of capability over operational time rather than a single sudden event.", "role_mapping": "Gradual degradation -> continuous loss over time.", "slug": "temporal_decay_and_degradation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b021_a09_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Degradation is gradual. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["degradation_is_gradual"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Gradual Deterioration", "one_liner": "The incremental, often invisible decay of a system as sub-threshold stressors accumulate damage until capacity collapses, posing greater risk precisely because the slow progression is easy to overlook.", "page_ref": "prime:gradual_deterioration", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Gradual degradation -> incremental damage accumulation.", "slug": "gradual_deterioration", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires sub-threshold stressors and incremental damage to accumulate slowly before a latent failure threshold is crossed."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Temporal Decay and Degradation", "one_liner": "System properties or capabilities systematically diminish over time.", "page_ref": "prime:temporal_decay_and_degradation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Gradual degradation -> continuous loss over time.", "slug": "temporal_decay_and_degradation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires systematic continuous loss of capability over operational time rather than a single sudden event."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Degradation is gradual.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires escalating repair cost and risk as degradation progresses and includes irreversible change through use or age.", "role_mapping": "Costly failure -> escalating late repair; hard reversal -> irreversible degradation.", "slug": "temporal_decay_and_degradation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b021_a09_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Failure is costly or hard to reverse. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["failure_is_costly_or_hard_to_reverse"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Temporal Decay and Degradation", "one_liner": "System properties or capabilities systematically diminish over time.", "page_ref": "prime:temporal_decay_and_degradation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Costly failure -> escalating late repair; hard reversal -> irreversible degradation.", "slug": "temporal_decay_and_degradation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires escalating repair cost and risk as degradation progresses and includes irreversible change through use or age."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Failure is costly or hard to reverse.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime explicitly requires often-invisible sub-threshold damage whose slow progression is dangerous because it is easy to overlook.", "role_mapping": "Ordinary attention failure -> invisible incremental damage.", "slug": "gradual_deterioration", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b021_a09_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Ordinary attention is insufficient. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["ordinary_attention_is_insufficient"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Gradual Deterioration", "one_liner": "The incremental, often invisible decay of a system as sub-threshold stressors accumulate damage until capacity collapses, posing greater risk precisely because the slow progression is easy to overlook.", "page_ref": "prime:gradual_deterioration", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Ordinary attention failure -> invisible incremental damage.", "slug": "gradual_deterioration", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime explicitly requires often-invisible sub-threshold damage whose slow progression is dangerous because it is easy to overlook."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Ordinary attention is insufficient to notice the accumulating deterioration.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Early signals exist.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source states: Early signals exist. The normalized feasibility condition is: Early signals exist. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["early_signals_exist"]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "early_signals_exist"}, {"display_text": "Response window exists.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source states: Response window exists. The normalized feasibility condition is: Response window exists. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["response_window_exists"]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "response_window_exists"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 21, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-021", "ledger_sha256": "91a43e408f8849a0887979d25b17b9ad399b9052a3e7e98be91ec6258e76e657"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Deterministic Transition Contract", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:deterministic_transition_contract", "slug": "deterministic_transition_contract"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 3, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 3 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A process, model, rule system, workflow, or decision procedure is expected to behave predictably, but the transition from present state to next state is under-specified. Hidden state, race conditions, unordered operations, implicit context, uncontrolled randomness, drifting dependencies, or conflicting rules allow multiple successor states. Because the system lacks an explicit deterministic transition contract, operators cannot reliably reproduce, audit, simulate, validate, or assign responsibility for outcomes.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Apparently identical starting conditions produce divergent or incomparable successors, while hidden state, unordered influences, randomness, or drifting transition assumptions prevent operators from locating the source of deviation."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Determinism requires the opposite: complete state plus law fixes exactly one successor.", "slug": "determinism"}, {"falls_short_because": "The distinction includes deterministic systems with one successor and therefore does not universally entail divergent outputs.", "slug": "stochasticity_vs_determinism"}, {"falls_short_because": "A state-transition system can be deterministic and single-valued, so divergent successors are optional.", "slug": "state_and_state_transition"}], "residual_id": "r:deterministic_transition_contract:b021_a10_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b021_a10_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A process, model, rule system, workflow, or decision procedure is expected to behave predictably, but the transition from present state to next state is under-specified. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The same input and apparent starting state sometimes produce different outputs or next states.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The same input and apparent starting state sometimes produce different outputs or next states.", "A process, model, rule system, workflow, or decision procedure is expected to behave predictably, but the transition from present state to next state is under-specified."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Determinism requires the opposite: complete state plus law fixes exactly one successor.", "slug": "determinism"}, {"falls_short_because": "The distinction includes deterministic systems with one successor and therefore does not universally entail divergent outputs.", "slug": "stochasticity_vs_determinism"}, {"falls_short_because": "A state-transition system can be deterministic and single-valued, so divergent successors are optional.", "slug": "state_and_state_transition"}], "normalized_requirement": "The same input and apparent starting state sometimes produce different outputs or next states.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The same input and apparent starting state sometimes produce different outputs or next states.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P029-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve teams or a strict operational-group subtype as the epistemic actors.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Teams are the actors attempting causal identification.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve deviations from an expected transition or outcome as the explanandum.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Observed deviations are the effects being explained.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the causal-source question rather than mere classification of deviations.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A causal source produces the deviations.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require epistemic inability to distinguish the causal source.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The teams cannot identify which cause produced the deviations.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve uncertainty among the listed transition-deviation cause family rather than an unrelated unknown cause.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The competing explanations include rule change, environmental drift, hidden state, concurrency, and random variation.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Teams cannot tell whether deviations come from rule change, environmental drift, hidden state, concurrency, or random variation.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Teams cannot identify which listed cause produces observed deviations.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P029-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime clarifies ontological single- versus multiple-future architecture and can be fully known; it does not entail a team's epistemic inability to locate deviations.", "slug": "stochasticity_vs_determinism"}], "residual_id": "r:deterministic_transition_contract:b021_a10_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b021_a10_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Hidden state, race conditions, unordered operations, implicit context, uncontrolled randomness, drifting dependencies, or conflicting rules allow multiple successor states. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Teams cannot tell whether deviations come from rule change, environmental drift, hidden state, concurrency, or random variation.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Teams cannot tell whether deviations come from rule change, environmental drift, hidden state, concurrency, or random variation.", "Hidden state, race conditions, unordered operations, implicit context, uncontrolled randomness, drifting dependencies, or conflicting rules allow multiple successor states."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime clarifies ontological single- versus multiple-future architecture and can be fully known; it does not entail a team's epistemic inability to locate deviations.", "slug": "stochasticity_vs_determinism"}], "normalized_requirement": "Teams cannot tell whether deviations come from rule change, environmental drift, hidden state, concurrency, or random variation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Teams cannot tell whether deviations come from rule change, environmental drift, hidden state, concurrency, or random variation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P029-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve teams or a strict operational-group subtype as the epistemic actors.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Teams are the actors attempting causal identification.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve deviations from an expected transition or outcome as the explanandum.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Observed deviations are the effects being explained.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the causal-source question rather than mere classification of deviations.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A causal source produces the deviations.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require epistemic inability to distinguish the causal source.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The teams cannot identify which cause produced the deviations.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve uncertainty among the listed transition-deviation cause family rather than an unrelated unknown cause.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The competing explanations include rule change, environmental drift, hidden state, concurrency, and random variation.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Teams cannot tell whether deviations come from rule change, environmental drift, hidden state, concurrency, or random variation.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Teams cannot identify which listed cause produces observed deviations.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P029-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime clarifies ontological single- versus multiple-future architecture and can be fully known; it does not entail a team's epistemic inability to locate deviations.", "slug": "stochasticity_vs_determinism"}], "residual_id": "r:deterministic_transition_contract:b021_a10_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b021_a10_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Hidden state, race conditions, unordered operations, implicit context, uncontrolled randomness, drifting dependencies, or conflicting rules allow multiple successor states. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Teams cannot tell whether deviations come from rule change, environmental drift, hidden state, concurrency, or random variation.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Teams cannot tell whether deviations come from rule change, environmental drift, hidden state, concurrency, or random variation.", "Hidden state, race conditions, unordered operations, implicit context, uncontrolled randomness, drifting dependencies, or conflicting rules allow multiple successor states."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime clarifies ontological single- versus multiple-future architecture and can be fully known; it does not entail a team's epistemic inability to locate deviations.", "slug": "stochasticity_vs_determinism"}], "normalized_requirement": "Teams cannot tell whether deviations come from rule change, environmental drift, hidden state, concurrency, or random variation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Teams cannot tell whether deviations come from rule change, environmental drift, hidden state, concurrency, or random variation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P030-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O9"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve more than one total influence; members of the set may be mixed across the listed types.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A plural set of influences drawn from the listed types is present.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a successor or next-state role rather than an unrelated decision outcome.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The next state is the affected outcome.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve influence capability; actual influence on every transition is not required.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The multiple influences can affect the next state.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve absence of one unique ordering over the multiple transition influences.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "No single ordering resolves the influences.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve absence of a tie-break rule for otherwise competing influences.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "No tie-break rule resolves the influences.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve the presence of a rule among the plural influence set.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "At least one influence is a rule.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve the presence of an actor among the plural influence set.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "At least one influence is an actor.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve the presence of a service among the plural influence set.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "At least one influence is a service.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve the presence of a data source among the plural influence set.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "At least one influence is a data source.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Multiple rules, actors, services, or data sources can influence the next state without either a single ordering or a tie-break rule.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Multiple influences drawn from the listed types can affect the next state while lacking a unique ordering and a tie-break rule.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P030-C01-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Determinism requires a single-valued transition, the opposite of the missing-order state; deterministic rules may already include a complete tie-break.", "slug": "determinism"}], "residual_id": "r:deterministic_transition_contract:b021_a10_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b021_a10_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Multiple rules, actors, services, or data sources can influence the next state without a single ordering or tie-break rule. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Multiple rules, actors, services, or data sources can influence the next state without a single ordering or tie-break rule."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Determinism requires a single-valued transition, the opposite of the missing-order state; deterministic rules may already include a complete tie-break.", "slug": "determinism"}], "normalized_requirement": "Multiple rules, actors, services, or data sources influence the next state without a single ordering or tie-break rule.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Multiple rules, actors, services, or data sources influence the next state without a single ordering or tie-break rule.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P029-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve teams or a strict operational-group subtype as the epistemic actors.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Teams are the actors attempting causal identification.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve deviations from an expected transition or outcome as the explanandum.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Observed deviations are the effects being explained.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the causal-source question rather than mere classification of deviations.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A causal source produces the deviations.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require epistemic inability to distinguish the causal source.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The teams cannot identify which cause produced the deviations.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve uncertainty among the listed transition-deviation cause family rather than an unrelated unknown cause.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The competing explanations include rule change, environmental drift, hidden state, concurrency, and random variation.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Teams cannot tell whether deviations come from rule change, environmental drift, hidden state, concurrency, or random variation.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Teams cannot identify which listed cause produces observed deviations.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P029-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime clarifies ontological single- versus multiple-future architecture and can be fully known; it does not entail a team's epistemic inability to locate deviations.", "slug": "stochasticity_vs_determinism"}], "residual_id": "r:deterministic_transition_contract:b021_a10_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b021_a10_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Hidden state, race conditions, unordered operations, implicit context, uncontrolled randomness, drifting dependencies, or conflicting rules allow multiple successor states. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Teams cannot tell whether deviations come from rule change, environmental drift, hidden state, concurrency, or random variation.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Teams cannot tell whether deviations come from rule change, environmental drift, hidden state, concurrency, or random variation.", "Hidden state, race conditions, unordered operations, implicit context, uncontrolled randomness, drifting dependencies, or conflicting rules allow multiple successor states."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime clarifies ontological single- versus multiple-future architecture and can be fully known; it does not entail a team's epistemic inability to locate deviations.", "slug": "stochasticity_vs_determinism"}], "normalized_requirement": "Teams cannot tell whether deviations come from rule change, environmental drift, hidden state, concurrency, or random variation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Teams cannot tell whether deviations come from rule change, environmental drift, hidden state, concurrency, or random variation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P030-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve results or outputs from related simulation, modeling, or planning runs.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Results from a repeated activity are the comparison objects.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a between-runs comparison rather than one isolated result.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "At least two runs are involved.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve cross-run change in transition assumptions, not stable assumptions or unrelated input changes.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Transition assumptions drift between the runs.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve inability or invalidity of comparison, not merely reduced convenience.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The results cannot be compared.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve drift-to-incomparability direction rather than mere co-occurrence.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The assumption drift causes the comparison failure.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires results of simulation runs.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The incomparable outputs are simulation results.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires results of modeling runs.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The incomparable outputs are modeling results.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires results of planning runs.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The incomparable outputs are planning results.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Simulation, modeling, or planning results cannot be compared because transition assumptions drift between runs.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Transition-assumption drift across runs makes one listed result type incomparable.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P030-C02-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A deterministic system can hold state and laws fixed across runs; determinism does not require drifting assumptions or incomparable models.", "slug": "determinism"}], "residual_id": "r:deterministic_transition_contract:b021_a10_c8", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b021_a10_c8", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A process, model, rule system, workflow, or decision procedure is expected to behave predictably, but the transition from present state to next state is under-specified. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Simulation, modeling, or planning results cannot be compared because transition assumptions drift between runs.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Simulation, modeling, or planning results cannot be compared because transition assumptions drift between runs.", "A process, model, rule system, workflow, or decision procedure is expected to behave predictably, but the transition from present state to next state is under-specified."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A deterministic system can hold state and laws fixed across runs; determinism does not require drifting assumptions or incomparable models.", "slug": "determinism"}], "normalized_requirement": "Simulation, modeling, or planning results cannot be compared because transition assumptions drift between runs.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Simulation, modeling, or planning results cannot be compared because transition assumptions drift between runs.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [8], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A workflow, algorithm, policy, or simulation must be reproducible for audit, testing, scientific validation, safety, or legal fairness.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: A workflow, algorithm, policy, or simulation must be reproducible for audit, testing, scientific validation, safety, or legal fairness. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A workflow, algorithm, policy, or simulation must be reproducible for audit, testing, scientific validation, safety, or legal fairness."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "A workflow, algorithm, policy, or simulation must be reproducible for audit, testing, scientific validation, safety, or legal fairness."}, {"display_text": "A stochastic or probabilistic process needs a reproducible deterministic mode for test, replay, explanation, or incident analysis.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: A stochastic or probabilistic process needs a reproducible deterministic mode for test, replay, explanation, or incident analysis. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A stochastic or probabilistic process needs a reproducible deterministic mode for test, replay, explanation, or incident analysis."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "A stochastic or probabilistic process needs a reproducible deterministic mode for test, replay, explanation, or incident analysis."}, {"display_text": "Downstream systems rely on the guarantee that a state transition has a unique resulting state.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Deterministic transitions create reproducibility and fairness, but real systems are open, concurrent, noisy, and context-sensitive. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: Downstream systems rely on the guarantee that a state transition has a unique resulting state. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Downstream systems rely on the guarantee that a state transition has a unique resulting state.", "Deterministic transitions create reproducibility and fairness, but real systems are open, concurrent, noisy, and context-sensitive."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Downstream systems rely on the guarantee that a state transition has a unique resulting state."}, {"display_text": "Policy or governance decisions require equal cases to be treated alike under a known rule set.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A process, model, rule system, workflow, or decision procedure is expected to behave predictably, but the transition from present state to next state is under-specified. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: Policy or governance decisions require equal cases to be treated alike under a known rule set. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Policy or governance decisions require equal cases to be treated alike under a known rule set.", "A process, model, rule system, workflow, or decision procedure is expected to behave predictably, but the transition from present state to next state is under-specified."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "Policy or governance decisions require equal cases to be treated alike under a known rule set."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 21, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-021", "ledger_sha256": "91a43e408f8849a0887979d25b17b9ad399b9052a3e7e98be91ec6258e76e657"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Deviant Case Analysis", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:deviant_case_analysis", "slug": "deviant_case_analysis"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A theory, model, rule, typology, evaluation, or empirical pattern predicts one thing across a set of cases, but one or more cases behave differently. The difference may reveal a boundary condition, omitted variable, hidden mechanism, or classification error, yet ordinary workflows often either discard the case as noise, celebrate it as an anecdote, or force it into the old pattern.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A case that belongs within a working account's comparison scope behaves contrary to the account and remains unexplained by explanations that fit ordinary cases."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a discordant case that the current account failed to predict, predicted wrongly, or excluded.", "role_mapping": "Expected pattern -> current account; violating case -> discordant case.", "slug": "negative_case_analysis", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b021_a11_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A case violates an expected outcome, causal pathway, classification, trend, benchmark, or cross-case association. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A case violates an expected outcome, causal pathway, classification, trend, benchmark, or cross-case association."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Negative Case Analysis", "one_liner": "Deliberately hunt the cases that would overturn your account, then revise or scope it.", "page_ref": "prime:negative_case_analysis", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Expected pattern -> current account; violating case -> discordant case.", "slug": "negative_case_analysis", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a discordant case that the current account failed to predict, predicted wrongly, or excluded."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A case violates an expected outcome, pathway, classification, trend, benchmark, or association.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires an implied scope boundary against which a found discordant case pressures the account; an obviously irrelevant case would not be a negative case.", "role_mapping": "Comparison universe -> claimed scope; focal case -> discordant in-scope candidate.", "slug": "negative_case_analysis", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b021_a11_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The archetype manages this tension by requiring verification, explicit comparison, within-case tracing, and bounded revision. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The case appears to belong in the same comparison universe as ordinary cases rather than being obviously out of scope.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The case appears to belong in the same comparison universe as ordinary cases rather than being obviously out of scope.", "The archetype manages this tension by requiring verification, explicit comparison, within-case tracing, and bounded revision."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Negative Case Analysis", "one_liner": "Deliberately hunt the cases that would overturn your account, then revise or scope it.", "page_ref": "prime:negative_case_analysis", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Comparison universe -> claimed scope; focal case -> discordant in-scope candidate.", "slug": "negative_case_analysis", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires an implied scope boundary against which a found discordant case pressures the account; an obviously irrelevant case would not be a negative case."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The case appears to belong in the same comparison universe as ordinary cases rather than being obviously out of scope.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a current account plus a discordant case that the account fails to cover and that forces falsification, narrowing, or mechanism revision.", "role_mapping": "Existing explanation -> current account; focal failure -> discordant case.", "slug": "negative_case_analysis", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b021_a11_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Existing explanations can describe the typical cases but struggle to explain the focal case. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Existing explanations can describe the typical cases but struggle to explain the focal case."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Negative Case Analysis", "one_liner": "Deliberately hunt the cases that would overturn your account, then revise or scope it.", "page_ref": "prime:negative_case_analysis", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Existing explanation -> current account; focal failure -> discordant case.", "slug": "negative_case_analysis", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a current account plus a discordant case that the account fails to cover and that forces falsification, narrowing, or mechanism revision."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Existing explanations describe typical cases but struggle to explain the focal case.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The deviation has practical, theoretical, ethical, safety, or explanatory importance beyond curiosity.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The deviation has practical, theoretical, ethical, safety, or explanatory importance beyond curiosity. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The deviation has practical, theoretical, ethical, safety, or explanatory importance beyond curiosity."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "The deviation has practical, theoretical, ethical, safety, or explanatory importance beyond curiosity."}, {"display_text": "There is enough case-level evidence to reconstruct sequence, context, actors, constraints, or mechanism rather than only label the case anomalous.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The difference may reveal a boundary condition, omitted variable, hidden mechanism, or classification error, yet ordinary workflows often either discard the case as noise, celebrate it as an anecdote, or force it into the old pattern. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: There is enough case-level evidence to reconstruct sequence, context, actors, constraints, or mechanism rather than only label the case anomalous. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["There is enough case-level evidence to reconstruct sequence, context, actors, constraints, or mechanism rather than only label the case anomalous.", "The difference may reveal a boundary condition, omitted variable, hidden mechanism, or classification error, yet ordinary workflows often either discard the case as noise, celebrate it as an anecdote, or force it into the old pattern."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "There is enough case-level evidence to reconstruct sequence, context, actors, constraints, or mechanism rather than only label the case anomalous."}, {"display_text": "A research, diagnostic, evaluation, or operational process needs to learn from exceptions without overfitting to them.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: A research, diagnostic, evaluation, or operational process needs to learn from exceptions without overfitting to them. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A research, diagnostic, evaluation, or operational process needs to learn from exceptions without overfitting to them."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "A research, diagnostic, evaluation, or operational process needs to learn from exceptions without overfitting to them."}, {"display_text": "Stakeholders disagree about whether the case is a measurement artifact, isolated exception, evidence of a new subtype, or sign that the theory is wrong.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Stakeholders disagree about whether the case is a measurement artifact, isolated exception, evidence of a new subtype, or sign that the theory is wrong. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders disagree about whether the case is a measurement artifact, isolated exception, evidence of a new subtype, or sign that the theory is wrong."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "Stakeholders disagree about whether the case is a measurement artifact, isolated exception, evidence of a new subtype, or sign that the theory is wrong."}, {"display_text": "A previous comparative analysis produced residuals, unexplained cases, unexpected successes, unexpected failures, or negative cases that were left uninterpreted.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: A previous comparative analysis produced residuals, unexplained cases, unexpected successes, unexpected failures, or negative cases that were left uninterpreted. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A previous comparative analysis produced residuals, unexplained cases, unexpected successes, unexpected failures, or negative cases that were left uninterpreted."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 8, "text": "A previous comparative analysis produced residuals, unexplained cases, unexpected successes, unexpected failures, or negative cases that were left uninterpreted."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 21, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-021", "ledger_sha256": "91a43e408f8849a0887979d25b17b9ad399b9052a3e7e98be91ec6258e76e657"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Dialectical Synthesis", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:dialectical_synthesis", "slug": "dialectical_synthesis"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 5, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is forced opposition. A system frames the decision as if two positions exhaust the available choices: centralize or decentralize, standardize or adapt, protect privacy or pursue transparency, teach directly or let learners discover. Each side becomes a pole in a recurring argument. Because each side is partly right, the debate cannot be resolved by simply dismissing one side. Because each side is incomplete, choosing either side alone creates predictable failure.\n\nThe result is often polarization, stale compromise, or oscillation. A team adopts one pole, experiences its failure mode, swings to the other pole, and later rediscovers the original problem. Dialectical Synthesis treats this cycle as evidence that the opposition contains reusable design information.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A consequential conflict is polarized as a forced choice between opposing but partly valid positions, each incomplete and failure-producing when treated as sufficient."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The conflict is polarized as a forced binary choice and the positions are defended as complete rather than responsively refined.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The conflict is polarized as a forced binary choice and the positions are defended as complete rather than responsively refined.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P030-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve two positions rather than a single position with two formulations.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Two distinct positions are present.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require credibility or defensibility of both positions, not only one.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Each of the two positions is credible.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Two positions are both credible.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Each of two distinct positions is credible.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P030-C05-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P030-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve two positions rather than one internally complex position.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Two distinct positions are present.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require incompleteness of both positions, not merely disagreement between them.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Each of the two positions is incomplete.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Two positions are both incomplete.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Each of two distinct positions is incomplete.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P030-C05-U2"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Dialectic requires represented positions and responsive pressure, but one position may prove untenable and be abandoned rather than remaining credible and incomplete.", "slug": "dialectic"}], "residual_id": "r:dialectical_synthesis:b021_a12_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b021_a12_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Two positions are both credible and incomplete. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Two positions are both credible and incomplete."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PARTIALLY_DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A supposed COP breakdown in which one participant holds a complete picture would violate the exact record's constitutive distributed-partial-visibility condition.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Common-Operating-Picture Breakdown", "one_liner": "The failure mode where a multi-party response acts incoherently because its engineered shared picture fails to synthesise participants' partial views — relocating the fault from the responders to the artefact, whose currency, completeness, and consistency become the lever.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:common_operating_picture_breakdown", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "common_operating_picture_breakdown"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "common_operating_picture_breakdown", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P030-C05-U2", "why_it_fits": "Every complete common-operating-picture breakdown has multiple distinct participant positions and makes each partial, hence incomplete. The unit asks only that two distinct positions each be incomplete."}], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 2, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 1, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Dialectic requires represented positions and responsive pressure, but one position may prove untenable and be abandoned rather than remaining credible and incomplete.", "slug": "dialectic"}], "normalized_requirement": "Two positions are both credible and incomplete.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "PARTIAL_EXISTING_DSA_GROUNDING", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation grounded 1 of 2 eligible atomic units; the remaining unit or units stayed open."}, "predicate": "Two positions are both credible and incomplete.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P030-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a debate or structured dispute rather than arbitrary repeated activity.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A debate is the recurring activity.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve more than one recurrence of the debate.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The debate occurs repeatedly.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a decision rather than generic knowledge as the affected endpoint.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A decision is the intended improvement target.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve absence of decision improvement despite repeated debate.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The decision does not improve.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must connect recurrence to decision stagnation rather than merely contain both facts.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The repeated debate fails to improve the decision.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "The debate repeats without improving the decision.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Repeated debate fails to improve the decision.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P030-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Responsive refinement is mandatory in dialectic, so a valid instance need not repeat without improvement and may produce rapid clarification.", "slug": "dialectic"}], "residual_id": "r:dialectical_synthesis:b021_a12_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b021_a12_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when a team repeats the same debate, swings between extremes, mistakes compromise for integration, or treats a legitimate tension as a problem to suppress rather than a source of better design. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The debate repeats without improving the decision.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The debate repeats without improving the decision.", "It is especially useful when a team repeats the same debate, swings between extremes, mistakes compromise for integration, or treats a legitimate tension as a problem to suppress rather than a source of better design."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Responsive refinement is mandatory in dialectic, so a valid instance need not repeat without improvement and may produce rapid clarification.", "slug": "dialectic"}], "normalized_requirement": "The debate repeats without improving the decision.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The debate repeats without improving the decision.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P030-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a compromise between positions or sides rather than an unrelated intervention.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A compromise is the hypothetical intervention.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve weakening of both sides, not only one.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Two sides are affected.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the predicted or counterfactual weakening, not necessarily an already enacted compromise.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The compromise would weaken both sides.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the underlying structural problem rather than a superficial disagreement alone.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A structural problem is the intended solution target.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve failure of the compromise to resolve the structural problem.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The compromise would not solve the structural problem.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the source's opposed-outcome contrast for the same compromise.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "Weakening both sides occurs rather than solving the problem.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "A compromise would weaken both sides rather than solve the structural problem.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A compromise would weaken each side instead of solving the structural problem.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P030-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Dialectic does not require a proposed compromise or a prediction that compromise weakens both positions.", "slug": "dialectic"}], "residual_id": "r:dialectical_synthesis:b021_a12_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b021_a12_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A compromise would weaken both sides rather than solve the structural problem. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A compromise would weaken both sides rather than solve the structural problem."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Dialectic does not require a proposed compromise or a prediction that compromise weakens both positions.", "slug": "dialectic"}], "normalized_requirement": "A compromise would weaken both positions rather than solve the structural problem.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A compromise would weaken both positions rather than solve the structural problem.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Dialectic pressures claims and assumptions but does not establish an absolute non-ignorable status for particular values, evidence, or constraints.", "slug": "dialectic"}], "residual_id": "r:dialectical_synthesis:b021_a12_c4", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b021_a12_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Dialectical Synthesis treats this cycle as evidence that the opposition contains reusable design information. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The conflict contains values, evidence, or constraints that cannot be ignored.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The conflict contains values, evidence, or constraints that cannot be ignored.", "Dialectical Synthesis treats this cycle as evidence that the opposition contains reusable design information."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Dialectic pressures claims and assumptions but does not establish an absolute non-ignorable status for particular values, evidence, or constraints.", "slug": "dialectic"}], "normalized_requirement": "The conflict contains values, evidence, or constraints that cannot be ignored.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The conflict contains values, evidence, or constraints that cannot be ignored.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P030-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve opposition or conflict as the source of the outputs.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Opposition is the producing interaction.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve actual current insight production rather than mere potential insight.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The opposition is producing insight.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve absence of a usable design output.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The opposition has not produced a usable design.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve absence of a usable decision output.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The opposition has not produced a usable decision.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve not-yet timing rather than permanent impossibility or a deficit already corrected.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The lack of usable design and decision persists so far.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the contrast between insight production and absent usable outputs.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "Insight exists despite the current lack of usable design and decision.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Opposition is producing insight but has not yet produced either a usable design or a usable decision.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Opposition currently produces insight without yet yielding any usable design or decision.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P030-C08-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Dialectic can already have produced a usable conclusion, or can begin before any insight has emerged; this intermediate outcome is not mandatory.", "slug": "dialectic"}], "residual_id": "r:dialectical_synthesis:b021_a12_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b021_a12_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Dialectical Synthesis treats this cycle as evidence that the opposition contains reusable design information. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Opposition is producing insight but not yet a usable design or decision.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Opposition is producing insight but not yet a usable design or decision.", "Dialectical Synthesis treats this cycle as evidence that the opposition contains reusable design information."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Dialectic can already have produced a usable conclusion, or can begin before any insight has emerged; this intermediate outcome is not mandatory.", "slug": "dialectic"}], "normalized_requirement": "Opposition is producing insight but not yet a usable design or decision.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Opposition is producing insight but not yet a usable design or decision.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The disagreement may be level-based or context-dependent.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The disagreement may be level-based or context-dependent. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The disagreement may be level-based or context-dependent."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The disagreement may be level-based or context-dependent."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 21, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-021", "ledger_sha256": "91a43e408f8849a0887979d25b17b9ad399b9052a3e7e98be91ec6258e76e657"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Differentiated Pathway Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:differentiated_pathway_design", "slug": "differentiated_pathway_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 3 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is mismatch between uniform route design and heterogeneous learner conditions. A single route appears fair because everyone receives the same thing, but the actual effect may be unequal: some people face irrelevant barriers, some already possess prerequisites, and some need different examples or support to access the target.\n\nThe opposite failure is also common. Designers respond to variation by proliferating choices, tracks, accommodations, and custom assignments until no one can tell whether the pathways still share a standard. The archetype therefore solves a double problem: too little route variation blocks access, while ungoverned variation erodes comparability.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A uniform learning route is applied to a heterogeneous population and predictably produces divergent outcomes, including simultaneous underchallenge and overload."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P030-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must hold one learning route or sequence fixed across the compared groups.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The same sequence is applied across learner groups.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve more than one systematically identifiable learner group.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Multiple predictable learner groups are affected.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve outcome differences across the learner groups.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The groups receive divergent outcomes.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the uniform-sequence-to-outcome-divergence direction.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The same sequence produces the divergent outcomes.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires the same instruction sequence across learner groups.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The uniform route is an instruction sequence.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires the same onboarding sequence across learner groups.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The uniform route is an onboarding sequence.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires the same training sequence across learner groups.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The uniform route is a training sequence.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires the same practice sequence across learner groups.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The uniform route is a practice sequence.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "The same instruction, onboarding, training, or practice sequence is producing divergent outcomes for predictable groups of learners.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "One uniform listed sequence produces different outcomes across predictable learner groups.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P030-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Differentiated instruction can be adopted proactively for known heterogeneity before a uniform sequence has produced divergent group outcomes.", "slug": "differentiated_instruction"}], "residual_id": "r:differentiated_pathway_design:b021_a13_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b021_a13_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The same instruction, onboarding, training, or practice sequence is producing divergent outcomes for predictable groups of learners. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The same instruction, onboarding, training, or practice sequence is producing divergent outcomes for predictable groups of learners."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Differentiated instruction can be adopted proactively for known heterogeneity before a uniform sequence has produced divergent group outcomes.", "slug": "differentiated_instruction"}], "normalized_requirement": "The same instruction, onboarding, training, or practice sequence produces divergent outcomes for predictable learner groups.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The same instruction, onboarding, training, or practice sequence produces divergent outcomes for predictable learner groups.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime presumes a heterogeneous learning population with substantial readiness variation, which directly satisfies one disjunct of the condition.", "role_mapping": "Participants -> heterogeneous learners; readiness -> assessed variation.", "slug": "differentiated_instruction", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b021_a13_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Participants differ in readiness, language, prior exposure, confidence, role, access conditions, schedule, or environmental constraints. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Participants differ in readiness, language, prior exposure, confidence, role, access conditions, schedule, or environmental constraints."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Differentiated Instruction", "one_liner": "Tailor learning.", "page_ref": "prime:differentiated_instruction", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Participants -> heterogeneous learners; readiness -> assessed variation.", "slug": "differentiated_instruction", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime presumes a heterogeneous learning population with substantial readiness variation, which directly satisfies one disjunct of the condition."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Participants differ in readiness, language, prior exposure, confidence, role, access, schedule, or environmental constraints.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P030-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve one pace imposed uniformly rather than individualized pacing.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Uniform pacing is the causal instructional condition.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve comparatively advanced learners rather than learners generally.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Advanced learners are the affected group.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve pacing-to-outcome causality rather than co-occurrence.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Uniform pacing causes the advanced learners' outcome.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve disengagement as the outcome, not merely rapid completion or boredom.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The advanced learners disengage.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Uniform pacing causes advanced learners to disengage.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Uniform pacing causes advanced learners to disengage.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P030-C10-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P030-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve one pace imposed uniformly rather than individualized pacing.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Uniform pacing is the causal instructional condition.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve learners currently struggling with the uniform route.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Struggling learners are the affected group.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve pacing-to-outcome causality rather than independent learner difficulty.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Uniform pacing causes the struggling learners' outcome.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires delay or loss of progress relative to the pacing.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The struggling learners fall behind.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires concealment of learning gaps rather than merely having gaps.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The struggling learners hide gaps.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Uniform pacing causes struggling learners to fall behind or hide gaps.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Uniform pacing causes struggling learners to exhibit one listed adverse outcome.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P030-C10-U2"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime can respond to readiness heterogeneity before uniform pacing causes disengagement, hidden gaps, or falling behind.", "slug": "differentiated_instruction"}], "residual_id": "r:differentiated_pathway_design:b021_a13_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b021_a13_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Uniform pacing causes advanced learners to disengage while struggling learners fall behind or hide gaps. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Uniform pacing causes advanced learners to disengage while struggling learners fall behind or hide gaps."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 2, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 2}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime can respond to readiness heterogeneity before uniform pacing causes disengagement, hidden gaps, or falling behind.", "slug": "differentiated_instruction"}], "normalized_requirement": "Uniform pacing makes advanced learners disengage while struggling learners fall behind or hide gaps.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 2 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Uniform pacing makes advanced learners disengage while struggling learners fall behind or hide gaps.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The system needs a common outcome standard, credential, capability, or baseline, but not everyone needs the same route to reach it.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when a cohort, user base, workforce, or learning population must reach a common capability but varies meaningfully in readiness, prior experience, role, language, access conditions, pace, constraints, or demonstration needs. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: The system needs a common outcome standard, credential, capability, or baseline, but not everyone needs the same route to reach it. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The system needs a common outcome standard, credential, capability, or baseline, but not everyone needs the same route to reach it.", "Use this archetype when a cohort, user base, workforce, or learning population must reach a common capability but varies meaningfully in readiness, prior experience, role, language, access conditions, pace, constraints, or demonstration needs."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "The system needs a common outcome standard, credential, capability, or baseline, but not everyone needs the same route to reach it."}, {"display_text": "Support decisions are ad hoc, stigmatizing, or dependent on who asks loudly enough for help.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Support decisions are ad hoc, stigmatizing, or dependent on who asks loudly enough for help. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Support decisions are ad hoc, stigmatizing, or dependent on who asks loudly enough for help."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Support decisions are ad hoc, stigmatizing, or dependent on who asks loudly enough for help."}, {"display_text": "Personalization is being offered without a clear common standard, making outcomes hard to compare.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Personalization is being offered without a clear common standard, making outcomes hard to compare. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Personalization is being offered without a clear common standard, making outcomes hard to compare."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Personalization is being offered without a clear common standard, making outcomes hard to compare."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 21, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-021", "ledger_sha256": "91a43e408f8849a0887979d25b17b9ad399b9052a3e7e98be91ec6258e76e657"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Diffusion Acceleration", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:diffusion_acceleration", "slug": "diffusion_acceleration"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 4 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is slow beneficial spread. Something useful exists, but the system’s social, technical, physical, or institutional medium does not transmit it well. The result is avoidable duplication, inequity, delayed learning, uneven capability, or persistent underperformance despite an available solution.\n\nThe problem often appears as isolated pockets of excellence. One team, clinic, community, lab, farm, or software group has solved a problem, while other relevant receivers continue without the benefit. The missing piece is not only a message; it is a pathway that turns exposure into trustworthy, supported adoption.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A beneficial practice, capability, resource, signal, or standard exists but reaches relevant adopters too slowly or unreliably because transmission or adoption pathways are impaired."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P030-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6", "O9"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6", "O10"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6", "O11"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the same practice, capability, resource, signal, or standard across locations.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "One listed element is the object expected to spread.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve established or demonstrated value rather than speculative promise.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The element has demonstrated value.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a particular location where the element's value has been demonstrated.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "One location is the demonstrated source location.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve destination locations relevant to receiving the same element.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Other relevant locations are the intended destinations.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve failure of reach or transmission beyond the source location.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The element is not reaching the other relevant locations.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve both sides of the source-location versus destination contrast.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "Demonstrated value at the source contrasts with non-reach at the destinations.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a practice demonstrated at one location.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The non-reaching element is a practice.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a capability demonstrated at one location.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The non-reaching element is a capability.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a resource demonstrated valuable at one location.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "The non-reaching element is a resource.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a signal demonstrated valuable at one location.", "obligation_id": "O10", "statement": "The non-reaching element is a signal.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a standard demonstrated valuable at one location.", "obligation_id": "O11", "statement": "The non-reaching element is a standard.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "A practice, capability, resource, signal, or standard has demonstrated value in one location but is not reaching other relevant locations.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A valuable listed element demonstrated at one location fails to reach other relevant locations.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P030-C13-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Physical diffusion requires a transportable quantity moving down a spatial gradient and explicitly excludes sociological practice or innovation spread.", "slug": "diffusion"}, {"falls_short_because": "Transfer can already succeed between source and target and does not require a valuable element currently failing to reach other locations.", "slug": "transfer_of_learning"}], "residual_id": "r:diffusion_acceleration:b021_a14_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b021_a14_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A practice, capability, resource, signal, or standard has demonstrated value in one location but is not reaching other relevant locations. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A practice, capability, resource, signal, or standard has demonstrated value in one location but is not reaching other relevant locations."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Physical diffusion requires a transportable quantity moving down a spatial gradient and explicitly excludes sociological practice or innovation spread.", "slug": "diffusion"}, {"falls_short_because": "Transfer can already succeed between source and target and does not require a valuable element currently failing to reach other locations.", "slug": "transfer_of_learning"}], "normalized_requirement": "A demonstrated-valuable practice, capability, resource, signal, or standard at one location is not reaching other relevant locations.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A demonstrated-valuable practice, capability, resource, signal, or standard at one location is not reaching other relevant locations.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P030-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve actors who could adopt the focal element, not arbitrary isolated actors.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Potential adopters are the disconnected actors.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve absence or breakage of a connection to the selected aid.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The potential adopters are disconnected from the selected aid.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires disconnection from a source of the adoptable element.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The disconnected aid is a source.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The source branch must preserve credibility as a property of the source role, not merely source availability or self-asserted status.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The selected source bears demonstrated credibility.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires disconnection from demonstrations of the adoptable element.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The disconnected aid is a demonstration.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires disconnection from support for adoption or use.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The disconnected aid is support.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Potential adopters are disconnected from credible sources, demonstrations, or support.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Potential adopters lack connection to one listed adoption aid.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P030-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Cultural diffusion can proceed through intact network ties and channels; it does not require disconnected adopters or absent support.", "slug": "cultural_diffusion"}], "residual_id": "r:diffusion_acceleration:b021_a14_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b021_a14_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Potential adopters are disconnected from credible sources, demonstrations, or support. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Potential adopters are disconnected from credible sources, demonstrations, or support."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Cultural diffusion can proceed through intact network ties and channels; it does not require disconnected adopters or absent support.", "slug": "cultural_diffusion"}], "normalized_requirement": "Potential adopters are disconnected from credible sources, demonstrations, or support.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Potential adopters are disconnected from credible sources, demonstrations, or support.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P030-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O9"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a frictional impediment affecting transmission or uptake of a solution.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A listed friction form is the focal impediment.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must attribute obstacle status to the selected friction, not merely mention it.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The selected friction is the actual obstacle.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve that lack of a solution is not the operative cause.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Absence of a solution is not the obstacle.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the rather-than contrast between friction and solution absence.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Obstacle attribution favors the selected friction rather than solution absence.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve transmission friction.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The selected friction is transmission friction.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve compatibility friction.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The selected friction is compatibility friction.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve trust friction.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The selected friction is trust friction.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve comprehension friction.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The selected friction is comprehension friction.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve adoption friction.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "The selected friction is adoption friction.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "The obstacle is transmission, compatibility, trust, comprehension, or adoption friction rather than the absence of a solution.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "One listed form of friction, rather than solution absence, is the obstacle.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P030-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime describes adoption dynamics across a population but can have low friction and rapid spread; a current friction bottleneck is not mandatory.", "slug": "cultural_diffusion"}], "residual_id": "r:diffusion_acceleration:b021_a14_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b021_a14_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The obstacle is transmission, compatibility, trust, comprehension, or adoption friction rather than the absence of a solution. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The obstacle is transmission, compatibility, trust, comprehension, or adoption friction rather than the absence of a solution."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Without the bridge, a missing cold chain, billing code, or supplier capacity can be described as a complement gap without using any listed friction subtype.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_BRIDGE", "name": "Ecosystem Mismatch", "one_liner": "Explain why a technically sound innovation stalls on deployment not by a flaw in the artifact but by the absence of one specific complementary asset its operating context tacitly required — leaving it complete-but-functionally-blocked.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:ecosystem_mismatch", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1", "O9"], "guard_type": "TYPE_SUBSUMPTION", "kind": "INTERPRETIVE_BRIDGE", "normalized_key": "missing_ecosystem_complement_is_adoption_friction", "predicate": "a missing required ecosystem complement that blocks deployment is adoption friction", "rationale": "The bridge is a single generally valid type subsumption over an existing causal role; it remains true outside this edge and adds no contextual fact."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "ecosystem_mismatch"}, {"kind": "INTERPRETIVE_BRIDGE", "value": "a missing required ecosystem complement that blocks deployment is adoption friction"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "ecosystem_mismatch", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P030-C15-U1", "why_it_fits": "The candidate directly fixes a sound existing solution and a missing external complement as the binding obstacle. A general type bridge supplies the adoption-friction branch without changing direction or actuality."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Transmission, compatibility, trust, comprehension, or adoption friction is the obstacle rather than absence of a solution.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P031-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a relative or insufficiently slow diffusion pace rather than spread at any speed.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Spread is slower than the relevant pace.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the directed causal relation from slow spread to the selected consequence.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The slower spread creates the downstream consequence.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires harm that could have been avoided by faster or more reliable spread.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The consequence is avoidable harm.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires slower spread to produce redundant or duplicated work.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The consequence is duplicated effort.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires slower spread to produce unequal access, burden, or outcome.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The consequence is inequity.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires learning that is lost because spread is slow.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The consequence is lost learning.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires coordination to be delayed by the slower spread.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The consequence is delayed coordination.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "Slow spread creates avoidable harm, duplicated effort, inequity, lost learning, or delayed coordination.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Slower spread causes one listed downstream consequence.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P031-C01-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Physical diffusion may be fast or slow without any normative harm, equity, learning, or coordination consequence.", "slug": "diffusion"}], "residual_id": "r:diffusion_acceleration:b021_a14_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b021_a14_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Slower spread creates avoidable harm, duplicated effort, inequity, lost learning, or delayed coordination. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Slower spread creates avoidable harm, duplicated effort, inequity, lost learning, or delayed coordination."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Physical diffusion may be fast or slow without any normative harm, equity, learning, or coordination consequence.", "slug": "diffusion"}], "normalized_requirement": "Slow spread creates avoidable harm, duplicated effort, inequity, lost learning, or delayed coordination.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Slow spread creates avoidable harm, duplicated effort, inequity, lost learning, or delayed coordination.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 21, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-021", "ledger_sha256": "91a43e408f8849a0887979d25b17b9ad399b9052a3e7e98be91ec6258e76e657"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Diffusion Containment", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:diffusion_containment", "slug": "diffusion_containment"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is harmful connectivity. The same channels that normally support coordination, learning, resource flow, technical dependency, or communication can carry harm. The system must therefore distinguish safe flow from harmful spread. Without that distinction, it tends to oscillate between two bad options: do nothing and allow propagation, or shut everything down and create collateral damage.\n\nA strong diagnosis names the payload and the path together. “There is misinformation” is incomplete. “This unverified claim is moving through repeated forwarding, trusted local groups, and recommendation boosts before verification can catch up” is closer to an archetypal diagnosis. “There is a system fault” is incomplete. “A compromised credential can move laterally through shared admin access” is path-aware.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A harmful payload can travel from a source to susceptible receivers through identifiable routes and can reproduce or propagate beyond the initially exposed receiver."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a harmful source and one or more finite routes with the capacity to carry it to a vulnerable target.", "role_mapping": "Harmful payload -> hazard; listed carrier -> pathway links; likely spread -> complete or latent route.", "slug": "exposure_pathway", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime requires a hazard or concerning process whose deliberate perimeter prevents spread or uncontrolled interaction with the surroundings.", "role_mapping": "Harmful payload -> contained hazard; likely spread -> reason for maintained perimeter.", "slug": "containment", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b021_a15_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Examples include infection moving through contact, a rumor moving through trust and attention, a fault moving through dependencies, contamination moving through a shared carrier, or a dangerous workaround spreading through imitation. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A harmful payload is spreading or is likely to spread through contact, exposure, network connection, recommendation, shared media, logistics, or dependency.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A harmful payload is spreading or is likely to spread through contact, exposure, network connection, recommendation, shared media, logistics, or dependency.", "Examples include infection moving through contact, a rumor moving through trust and attention, a fault moving through dependencies, contamination moving through a shared carrier, or a dangerous workaround spreading through imitation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Exposure Pathway", "one_liner": "The chain of links by which a hazard travels from source to vulnerable target, breakable at any link, turning risk into a graph search over severable routes.", "page_ref": "prime:exposure_pathway", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Harmful payload -> hazard; listed carrier -> pathway links; likely spread -> complete or latent route.", "slug": "exposure_pathway", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a harmful source and one or more finite routes with the capacity to carry it to a vulnerable target."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Containment", "one_liner": "Holding a hazard, process, or agent within a deliberately maintained perimeter to prevent its spread or uncontrolled interaction with the surroundings.", "page_ref": "prime:containment", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Harmful payload -> contained hazard; likely spread -> reason for maintained perimeter.", "slug": "containment", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a hazard or concerning process whose deliberate perimeter prevents spread or uncontrolled interaction with the surroundings."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A harmful payload is spreading or is likely to spread through contact, exposure, network connection, recommendation, shared media, logistics, or dependency.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a vulnerable receptor that would be harmed if a complete route brings the hazard into contact.", "role_mapping": "Receiving entity -> vulnerable receptor; susceptibility -> harm on contact.", "slug": "exposure_pathway", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime requires susceptible hosts in which contact reproduces the state and enables onward transmission.", "role_mapping": "Receiving node -> susceptible host; new source -> infected host transmitting onward.", "slug": "contagion", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b021_a15_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The receiving nodes, sites, audiences, components, or populations are susceptible to harm or may become new sources after exposure. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The receiving nodes, sites, audiences, components, or populations are susceptible to harm or may become new sources after exposure."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Exposure Pathway", "one_liner": "The chain of links by which a hazard travels from source to vulnerable target, breakable at any link, turning risk into a graph search over severable routes.", "page_ref": "prime:exposure_pathway", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Receiving entity -> vulnerable receptor; susceptibility -> harm on contact.", "slug": "exposure_pathway", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a vulnerable receptor that would be harmed if a complete route brings the hazard into contact."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Contagion", "one_liner": "Spread of a state from element to element through contact.", "page_ref": "prime:contagion", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Receiving node -> susceptible host; new source -> infected host transmitting onward.", "slug": "contagion", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires susceptible hosts in which contact reproduces the state and enables onward transmission."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Receiving nodes, sites, audiences, components, or populations are susceptible to harm or may become new sources after exposure.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a definite finite chain or small pathway set whose individual links can be enumerated and assigned.", "role_mapping": "Mappable pathways -> finite severable chains.", "slug": "exposure_pathway", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime requires a contact graph whose topology governs transmission reach and speed, making spread routes structurally representable even when empirically incomplete.", "role_mapping": "Path map -> contact graph; incomplete uncertainty -> partially observed topology.", "slug": "contagion", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b021_a15_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The pathways are specific enough to map or approximate, even if the map is incomplete under uncertainty. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The pathways are specific enough to map or approximate, even if the map is incomplete under uncertainty."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Exposure Pathway", "one_liner": "The chain of links by which a hazard travels from source to vulnerable target, breakable at any link, turning risk into a graph search over severable routes.", "page_ref": "prime:exposure_pathway", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Mappable pathways -> finite severable chains.", "slug": "exposure_pathway", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a definite finite chain or small pathway set whose individual links can be enumerated and assigned."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Contagion", "one_liner": "Spread of a state from element to element through contact.", "page_ref": "prime:contagion", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Path map -> contact graph; incomplete uncertainty -> partially observed topology.", "slug": "contagion", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a contact graph whose topology governs transmission reach and speed, making spread routes structurally representable even when empirically incomplete."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The pathways are specific enough to map or approximate even if the map is incomplete under uncertainty.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Doing nothing would allow avoidable secondary spread, cascading failure, contamination, rumor propagation, or behavioral imitation.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Examples include infection moving through contact, a rumor moving through trust and attention, a fault moving through dependencies, contamination moving through a shared carrier, or a dangerous workaround spreading through imitation. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Doing nothing would allow avoidable secondary spread, cascading failure, contamination, rumor propagation, or behavioral imitation. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Doing nothing would allow avoidable secondary spread, cascading failure, contamination, rumor propagation, or behavioral imitation.", "Examples include infection moving through contact, a rumor moving through trust and attention, a fault moving through dependencies, contamination moving through a shared carrier, or a dangerous workaround spreading through imitation."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Doing nothing would allow avoidable secondary spread, cascading failure, contamination, rumor propagation, or behavioral imitation."}, {"display_text": "The objective is not merely to punish a source, but to alter spread dynamics while preserving necessary safe flows.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The system must therefore distinguish safe flow from harmful spread. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: The objective is not merely to punish a source, but to alter spread dynamics while preserving necessary safe flows. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The objective is not merely to punish a source, but to alter spread dynamics while preserving necessary safe flows.", "The system must therefore distinguish safe flow from harmful spread."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The objective is not merely to punish a source, but to alter spread dynamics while preserving necessary safe flows."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 21, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-021", "ledger_sha256": "91a43e408f8849a0887979d25b17b9ad399b9052a3e7e98be91ec6258e76e657"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Dimensional Consistency Check", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:dimensional_consistency_check", "slug": "dimensional_consistency_check"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 2 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 2}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is that formal operations are easier than meaningful operations. A spreadsheet can add columns whose units do not match. A dashboard can rank percentages, totals, and rates side by side. A model can accept inputs with hidden unit conventions. A policy memo can compare regions of very different size without exposing denominators. These artifacts produce numbers that look usable even when the underlying quantities are incompatible.\n\nThe dangerous feature is that the error is often invisible. The output may be precise, visually polished, or mathematically sophisticated. Without an explicit compatibility check, reviewers may focus on the conclusion rather than the structure of the quantities that produced it.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A formal calculation, comparison, metric, or rule treats quantities as compatible even though their dimensions, denominators, time bases, scales, or semantic meanings are not aligned."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P031-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve multiple values or quantities as the comparison objects.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Two or more values are being compared.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require equality of the visible unit label.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The values share the same unit label.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require non-equivalence of the quantities or constructs denoted.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The values have different semantic meanings.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the mismatch despite surface unit-label agreement.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Shared labeling does not imply semantic compatibility.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Values share a unit label but have different semantic meanings.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Values share a unit label while denoting different semantic quantities.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P031-C05-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Two values can be dimensionally identical yet denote different constructs; physical unit consistency does not entail semantic mismatch.", "slug": "dimensional_analysis"}], "residual_id": "r:dimensional_consistency_check:b022_a01_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b022_a01_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Values have the same unit label but different semantic meaning. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Values have the same unit label but different semantic meaning."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Two values can be dimensionally identical yet denote different constructs; physical unit consistency does not entail semantic mismatch.", "slug": "dimensional_analysis"}], "normalized_requirement": "Values share a unit label but have different semantic meanings.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Values share a unit label but have different semantic meanings.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The semantically different quantities are nevertheless combined or compared without a valid alignment, and a result relies on that operation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The semantically different quantities are nevertheless combined or compared without a valid alignment, and a result relies on that operation.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A formula or spreadsheet combines values from different sources.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is less useful when the main problem is corrupt source data, missing evidence, representational aesthetics, or disagreement about values. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: A formula or spreadsheet combines values from different sources. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A formula or spreadsheet combines values from different sources.", "It is less useful when the main problem is corrupt source data, missing evidence, representational aesthetics, or disagreement about values."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "A formula or spreadsheet combines values from different sources."}, {"display_text": "Teams compare totals, percentages, rates, indexed values, or normalized scores.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A dashboard can rank percentages, totals, and rates side by side. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Teams compare totals, percentages, rates, indexed values, or normalized scores. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Teams compare totals, percentages, rates, indexed values, or normalized scores.", "A dashboard can rank percentages, totals, and rates side by side."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "Teams compare totals, percentages, rates, indexed values, or normalized scores."}, {"display_text": "A metric or model is transferred from one scale, population, jurisdiction, or system to another.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A model, calculation, comparison, metric, or policy rule mixes quantities whose units, dimensions, denominators, time bases, or scale meanings may be incompatible. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: A metric or model is transferred from one scale, population, jurisdiction, or system to another. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A metric or model is transferred from one scale, population, jurisdiction, or system to another.", "A model, calculation, comparison, metric, or policy rule mixes quantities whose units, dimensions, denominators, time bases, or scale meanings may be incompatible."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "A metric or model is transferred from one scale, population, jurisdiction, or system to another."}, {"display_text": "A result looks precise, automated, or mathematically formal.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The output may be precise, visually polished, or mathematically sophisticated. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: A result looks precise, automated, or mathematically formal. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A result looks precise, automated, or mathematically formal.", "The output may be precise, visually polished, or mathematically sophisticated."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "A result looks precise, automated, or mathematically formal."}, {"display_text": "A decision depends on a ratio, rate, index, or coefficient.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when a decision depends on a formula, metric, dashboard, model output, benchmark, normalized score, rate, ratio, or cross-context transfer. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: A decision depends on a ratio, rate, index, or coefficient. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A decision depends on a ratio, rate, index, or coefficient.", "Use this archetype when a decision depends on a formula, metric, dashboard, model output, benchmark, normalized score, rate, ratio, or cross-context transfer."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "A decision depends on a ratio, rate, index, or coefficient."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 22, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-022", "ledger_sha256": "5ee4a2492fc5a9807f53a77363a79d1f55eb55ca3ec19db3ac3cab077686fe47"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": [{"groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A purported complete instance with the ratio present but irrelevant to the classification and ranking would omit the exact record's constitutive sign-and-magnitude diagnostics.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Cross Elasticity of Demand", "one_liner": "The unit-free ratio of the percentage change in one good's quantity demanded to the percentage change in another good's price — whose sign classifies goods as substitutes, complements, or independent and whose magnitude ranks how tightly they constrain each other's prices.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:cross_elasticity_of_demand", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "cross_elasticity_of_demand"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "cross_elasticity_of_demand", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P031-C06-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every complete exact instance includes a unit-free ratio whose sign classifies the goods and whose magnitude ranks their constraint; that is a judgment depending on the ratio, not a quantity merely reported nearby."}], "publication_role": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT_ONLY", "source_residual_occurrence_id": "r:dimensional_consistency_check:b022_a01_c6", "unit": {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P031-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a choice, judgment, or action decision as the downstream role.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A decision is the dependent outcome.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail that the quantity is consequential to the decision, not merely reported nearby.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The decision depends on the derived quantity.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a ratio as the decision input.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The dependency quantity is a ratio.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a rate as the decision input.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The dependency quantity is a rate.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires an index as the decision input.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The dependency quantity is an index.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a coefficient as the decision input.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The dependency quantity is a coefficient.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "A decision depends on a ratio, rate, index, or coefficient.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A decision depends on one listed derived quantity.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P031-C06-U1"}}]}
{"archetype": {"name": "Dimensionality Reduction for Signal", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:dimensionality_reduction_for_signal", "slug": "dimensionality_reduction_for_signal"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 3, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 2, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 2 of 3 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is feature sprawl. The system is represented with more dimensions than people or models can use reliably. Some variables repeat the same information, some add mostly noise, some are weakly relevant, and some are meaningful only in combination. As the number of dimensions grows, it becomes harder to see what matters and easier to overfit, cherry-pick, or confuse complexity with understanding.\n\nThe opposite failure is careless simplification. Teams delete variables, average them, or project them into a small number of axes without checking whether critical information has disappeared. This can hide rare events, protected-group differences, safety signals, or domain meanings that do not dominate the average pattern.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A high-dimensional representation contains lower-dimensional useful structure, but independent degrees of freedom, redundancy, noise, or sparse evidence overwhelm current modeling or judgment."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a high-dimensional ambient representation and a lower-dimensional manifold or subspace that captures its latent structure.", "role_mapping": "Many variables -> ambient space; fewer useful patterns -> latent subspace.", "slug": "dimensionality_reduction", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b022_a02_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A dataset, dashboard, choice space, or diagnostic frame contains many variables but only a smaller number of patterns appears to drive useful judgment. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A dataset, dashboard, choice space, or diagnostic frame contains many variables but only a smaller number of patterns appears to drive useful judgment."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Dimensionality Reduction", "one_liner": "Reduce variables.", "page_ref": "prime:dimensionality_reduction", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Many variables -> ambient space; fewer useful patterns -> latent subspace.", "slug": "dimensionality_reduction", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a high-dimensional ambient representation and a lower-dimensional manifold or subspace that captures its latent structure."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A dataset, dashboard, choice space, or diagnostic frame has many variables while fewer patterns drive useful judgment.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The low-dimensional latent subspace makes ambient variables structurally redundant, satisfying the redundancy disjunct.", "role_mapping": "Correlated/redundant variables -> ambient coordinates generated by fewer latent dimensions.", "slug": "dimensionality_reduction", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime requires an independent-dimension space whose sample or search budget is sub-exponential, making observations sparse relative to the state space.", "role_mapping": "Too numerous relative to evidence -> dimension count exceeds sample budget.", "slug": "curse_of_dimensionality", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b022_a02_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Variables are correlated, redundant, sparse, highly noisy, or too numerous relative to the amount of evidence available. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Variables are correlated, redundant, sparse, highly noisy, or too numerous relative to the amount of evidence available."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Dimensionality Reduction", "one_liner": "Reduce variables.", "page_ref": "prime:dimensionality_reduction", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Correlated/redundant variables -> ambient coordinates generated by fewer latent dimensions.", "slug": "dimensionality_reduction", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The low-dimensional latent subspace makes ambient variables structurally redundant, satisfying the redundancy disjunct."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Curse Of Dimensionality", "one_liner": "Volume, sparsity, and distance intuitions degrade so fast with added dimensions that low-dimensional methods break down qualitatively, not just quantitatively.", "page_ref": "prime:curse_of_dimensionality", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Too numerous relative to evidence -> dimension count exceeds sample budget.", "slug": "curse_of_dimensionality", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires an independent-dimension space whose sample or search budget is sub-exponential, making observations sparse relative to the state space."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Variables are correlated, redundant, sparse, highly noisy, or too numerous relative to available evidence.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The low-dimensional latent subspace makes ambient variables structurally redundant, satisfying the redundancy disjunct.", "role_mapping": "Correlated/redundant variables -> ambient coordinates generated by fewer latent dimensions.", "slug": "dimensionality_reduction", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime requires an independent-dimension space whose sample or search budget is sub-exponential, making observations sparse relative to the state space.", "role_mapping": "Too numerous relative to evidence -> dimension count exceeds sample budget.", "slug": "curse_of_dimensionality", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b022_a02_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Variables are correlated, redundant, sparse, highly noisy, or too numerous relative to the amount of evidence available. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Variables are correlated, redundant, sparse, highly noisy, or too numerous relative to the amount of evidence available."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Dimensionality Reduction", "one_liner": "Reduce variables.", "page_ref": "prime:dimensionality_reduction", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Correlated/redundant variables -> ambient coordinates generated by fewer latent dimensions.", "slug": "dimensionality_reduction", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The low-dimensional latent subspace makes ambient variables structurally redundant, satisfying the redundancy disjunct."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Curse Of Dimensionality", "one_liner": "Volume, sparsity, and distance intuitions degrade so fast with added dimensions that low-dimensional methods break down qualitatively, not just quantitatively.", "page_ref": "prime:curse_of_dimensionality", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Too numerous relative to evidence -> dimension count exceeds sample budget.", "slug": "curse_of_dimensionality", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires an independent-dimension space whose sample or search budget is sub-exponential, making observations sparse relative to the state space."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Variables are correlated, redundant, sparse, highly noisy, or too numerous relative to available evidence.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a qualitative failure of density- or nearness-dependent methods when finite budget cannot cover exponentially growing volume.", "role_mapping": "Dimension count -> independent degrees of freedom; computational capacity -> sub-exponential budget.", "slug": "curse_of_dimensionality", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b022_a02_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The current representation makes visualization, modeling, communication, or comparison difficult because the number of dimensions overwhelms human or computational capacity. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The current representation makes visualization, modeling, communication, or comparison difficult because the number of dimensions overwhelms human or computational capacity."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Curse Of Dimensionality", "one_liner": "Volume, sparsity, and distance intuitions degrade so fast with added dimensions that low-dimensional methods break down qualitatively, not just quantitatively.", "page_ref": "prime:curse_of_dimensionality", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Dimension count -> independent degrees of freedom; computational capacity -> sub-exponential budget.", "slug": "curse_of_dimensionality", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a qualitative failure of density- or nearness-dependent methods when finite budget cannot cover exponentially growing volume."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The number of dimensions overwhelms human or computational capacity for visualization, modeling, communication, or comparison.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The low-dimensional latent subspace makes ambient variables structurally redundant, satisfying the redundancy disjunct.", "role_mapping": "Correlated/redundant variables -> ambient coordinates generated by fewer latent dimensions.", "slug": "dimensionality_reduction", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime requires an independent-dimension space whose sample or search budget is sub-exponential, making observations sparse relative to the state space.", "role_mapping": "Too numerous relative to evidence -> dimension count exceeds sample budget.", "slug": "curse_of_dimensionality", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b022_a02_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Variables are correlated, redundant, sparse, highly noisy, or too numerous relative to the amount of evidence available. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Variables are correlated, redundant, sparse, highly noisy, or too numerous relative to the amount of evidence available."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Dimensionality Reduction", "one_liner": "Reduce variables.", "page_ref": "prime:dimensionality_reduction", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Correlated/redundant variables -> ambient coordinates generated by fewer latent dimensions.", "slug": "dimensionality_reduction", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The low-dimensional latent subspace makes ambient variables structurally redundant, satisfying the redundancy disjunct."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Curse Of Dimensionality", "one_liner": "Volume, sparsity, and distance intuitions degrade so fast with added dimensions that low-dimensional methods break down qualitatively, not just quantitatively.", "page_ref": "prime:curse_of_dimensionality", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Too numerous relative to evidence -> dimension count exceeds sample budget.", "slug": "curse_of_dimensionality", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires an independent-dimension space whose sample or search budget is sub-exponential, making observations sparse relative to the state space."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Variables are correlated, redundant, sparse, highly noisy, or too numerous relative to available evidence.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P031-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O6", "O7", "O8", "O9", "O10"], ["O2", "O6", "O7", "O8", "O9", "O10"], ["O3", "O6", "O7", "O8", "O9", "O10"], ["O4", "O6", "O7", "O8", "O9", "O10"], ["O5", "O6", "O7", "O8", "O9", "O10"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a downstream model as the poorly performing artifact.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A model is the downstream artifact.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a downstream index as the poorly performing artifact.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "An index is the downstream artifact.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a downstream segment or segmentation as the poorly performing artifact.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A segment is the downstream artifact.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a downstream visualization as the poorly performing artifact.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A visualization is the downstream artifact.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a downstream monitor as the poorly performing artifact.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "A monitoring system is the downstream artifact.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve actual performance failure rather than risk or complexity alone.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The downstream artifact performs poorly.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve excessive feature proliferation as the upstream condition.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "Feature sprawl is the causal condition.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail increased noise caused by the feature sprawl.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "Feature sprawl amplifies noise.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail increased overfitting caused by the feature sprawl.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "Feature sprawl amplifies overfitting.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the complete feature-sprawl-to-mechanism-to-performance direction.", "obligation_id": "O10", "statement": "The amplified noise and overfitting cause the poor downstream performance.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "A downstream model, index, segment, visualization, or monitor performs poorly because feature sprawl amplifies noise and overfitting.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A listed downstream artifact performs poorly because feature sprawl amplifies both noise and overfitting.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P031-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The curse can break search or density estimation without feature sprawl amplifying noise or overfitting in any listed downstream artifact.", "slug": "curse_of_dimensionality"}, {"falls_short_because": "A reduction method can be used successfully and does not require an existing downstream performance failure.", "slug": "dimensionality_reduction"}], "residual_id": "r:dimensionality_reduction_for_signal:b022_a02_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b022_a02_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A downstream model, index, segment, visualization, or monitoring system performs poorly because feature sprawl amplifies noise and overfitting. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A downstream model, index, segment, visualization, or monitoring system performs poorly because feature sprawl amplifies noise and overfitting."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The curse can break search or density estimation without feature sprawl amplifying noise or overfitting in any listed downstream artifact.", "slug": "curse_of_dimensionality"}, {"falls_short_because": "A reduction method can be used successfully and does not require an existing downstream performance failure.", "slug": "dimensionality_reduction"}], "normalized_requirement": "A downstream model, index, segment, visualization, or monitor performs poorly because feature sprawl amplifies noise and overfitting.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A downstream model, index, segment, visualization, or monitor performs poorly because feature sprawl amplifies noise and overfitting.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Decision-makers need a compact representation but cannot safely collapse variables without preserving task-relevant differences.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Some variables repeat the same information, some add mostly noise, some are weakly relevant, and some are meaningful only in combination. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: Decision-makers need a compact representation but cannot safely collapse variables without preserving task-relevant differences. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Decision-makers need a compact representation but cannot safely collapse variables without preserving task-relevant differences.", "Some variables repeat the same information, some add mostly noise, some are weakly relevant, and some are meaningful only in combination."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Decision-makers need a compact representation but cannot safely collapse variables without preserving task-relevant differences."}, {"display_text": "The cost of collecting, processing, or explaining every variable exceeds the benefit of keeping the full representation.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The cost of collecting, processing, or explaining every variable exceeds the benefit of keeping the full representation. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The cost of collecting, processing, or explaining every variable exceeds the benefit of keeping the full representation."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The cost of collecting, processing, or explaining every variable exceeds the benefit of keeping the full representation."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 22, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-022", "ledger_sha256": "5ee4a2492fc5a9807f53a77363a79d1f55eb55ca3ec19db3ac3cab077686fe47"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Dimensioned Comparison Framing", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:dimensioned_comparison_framing", "slug": "dimensioned_comparison_framing"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 3, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 2, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 3 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "People, teams, models, dashboards, institutions, or evaluation systems draw conclusions from items that have not been made comparable. Hidden dimensions, mismatched units, different contexts, stale baselines, unequal evidence quality, order effects, or unspoken value weights turn the comparison into an artifact of framing rather than a reliable relation between the items.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A consequential comparison draws conclusions from items whose dimensions, scales, contexts, evidence bases, or relation-readout purposes are not aligned and whose comparison basis is hidden or opportunistically selected."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P031-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O9"], ["O1", "O2", "O10"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve plural items in an actual comparison relation.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "At least two items are the objects of comparison.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail non-alignment, not merely the presence of a comparison dimension.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The compared items differ along the selected dimension.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires scale mismatch.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The items differ in scale.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires contextual mismatch.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The items differ in context.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires temporal mismatch.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The items differ in timing.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires categorical mismatch.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The items differ in category.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires population mismatch.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The items differ in population.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires measurement-method mismatch.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The items differ in measurement method.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires evidence-quality mismatch.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "The items differ in evidence quality.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires mismatch in the values or evaluative dimensions applied.", "obligation_id": "O10", "statement": "The items differ in value dimensions.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Compared items differ across scale, context, timing, category, population, measurement method, evidence quality, or value dimensions.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Compared items differ along one listed load-bearing dimension.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P031-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Items can be compared while matched on every listed contextual dimension, and comparison alone does not require a mismatch.", "slug": "comparison"}], "residual_id": "r:dimensioned_comparison_framing:b022_a03_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b022_a03_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The items differ across scale, context, timing, category, population, measurement method, evidence quality, or value dimensions. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The items differ across scale, context, timing, category, population, measurement method, evidence quality, or value dimensions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Removing both the magnitude and kind difference leaves mere equivalence, not false equivalence; every exact instance therefore satisfies at least one complete scale-or-category branch.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "False Equivalence", "one_liner": "The fallacy of treating two things as comparably weighted on the dimension a judgment turns on, when they in fact differ by an order of magnitude or by kind — by highlighting a genuine shared feature and suppressing the difference that actually controls.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:false_equivalence", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "false_equivalence"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "false_equivalence", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P031-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact identity is itself disjunctive in the same safe way as the source: every instance compares two things and requires either an order-of-magnitude gap or a difference in kind. No guard is needed to choose a branch the candidate already exhaustively names."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "If the options had no attribute difference, joint presentation could not overweight that difference and the exact distinction-bias mechanism would be absent.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Distinction Bias", "one_liner": "Overweight attribute differences between options evaluated side by side relative to the weight those differences carry when each option is met alone, so preferences formed at the point of choice (joint mode) overpredict the utility actually experienced in use (separate mode).", "page_ref": "domain_specific:distinction_bias", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "distinction_bias"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "distinction_bias", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P031-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every complete instance compares multiple options and requires an actual attribute difference that receives a different evaluative weight in joint and separate modes, satisfying the value-dimensions branch directly."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "If there were no earlier-versus-later windows, no prior treatment could persist into a subsequent measurement and the exact carryover structure would disappear.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Carryover Effect", "one_liner": "The validity threat in crossover and within-subject designs where residual influence from an earlier treatment persists into a later measurement window, biasing the contrast — its magnitude set by the unit's relaxation time against the inter-treatment gap.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:carryover_effect", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "carryover_effect"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "carryover_effect", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P031-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "A complete crossover carryover instance necessarily compares responses in successive periods, and residual influence from the earlier condition makes that temporal non-alignment load-bearing."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A presentation with no distinct earlier or later comparison position cannot instantiate the exact temporal-neighbor mechanism, because there is then no sequential context by which clarity changes.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Sequential Clarity", "one_liner": "Judge how well each item in an ordered presentation stands out not by its own quality but by how much it contrasts with its immediate temporal neighbours inside the working-memory window.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:sequential_clarity", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "sequential_clarity"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "sequential_clarity", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P031-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record makes temporal neighborhood constitutive: clarity is judged by contrast with items immediately before or after the focal item. Distinct sequence positions therefore supply an actual, load-bearing timing difference even when content similarity is high."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "If tenor and vehicle were not categorically distinct, the expression would be literal identification or intraclass description rather than the exact simile relation.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Simile", "one_liner": "A marked explicit comparison that transfers a single salient attribute from a familiar vehicle to an unfamiliar topic while keeping the two distinct, enabling fast perceptual or affective uptake.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:simile", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "simile"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "simile", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P031-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every complete simile explicitly compares a tenor with a categorically distinct vehicle while preserving rather than collapsing that distinction, satisfying the category branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Equal probability judgments would not instantiate the fallacy, because the exact identity requires the conjunction to be rated more probable than its constituent.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Conjunction Fallacy", "one_liner": "Detect a probability-judgment error by watching for a more detailed scenario being rated more probable than the simpler scenario it is a strict subset of — the signature of resemblance quietly standing in for probability.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:conjunction_fallacy", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "conjunction_fallacy"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "conjunction_fallacy", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P031-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every complete instance compares at least P(A) and P(A and B) and assigns the conjunction a larger probability value. The values applied to the compared event descriptions therefore differ, satisfying the value-dimensions branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "If the reported posterior equaled the Bayesian benchmark, there would be no signed update shortfall and therefore no complete conservatism-bias instance.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Conservatism Bias", "one_liner": "Capture the tendency of people to revise a probability judgment less than Bayes' rule prescribes when evidence arrives — the reported posterior landing short of the correct one, anchored too close to the prior — measured as a signed gap against an explicit Bayesian benchmark.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:conservatism_bias", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "conservatism_bias"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "conservatism_bias", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P031-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact bias is defined only when the reported posterior lands between the prior and Bayesian target and is measurably closer to the prior. Thus every complete instance compares two probability values that actually differ."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A report whose expressed resolution exactly matches its evidential support is not falsely precise, so the scale mismatch cannot be removed while preserving the exact candidate.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "False Precision", "one_liner": "The measurement-communication fallacy of expressing a quantity with more significant figures or tighter bounds than the underlying evidence supports — a mismatch between the form of the claim and its warrant, read by audiences as unearned precision of knowledge.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:false_precision", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "false_precision"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "false_precision", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P031-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every complete instance expresses more significant figures, tighter bounds, or finer resolution than the underlying evidence supports. That necessarily compares and mismatches two precision scales."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "If both analyses used the same adjustment method, the exact two-method paradox would be absent even if an arithmetic disagreement happened for another reason.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Lord's Paradox", "one_liner": "Show that two arithmetically correct analyses of the same pre-post data — raw change scores versus baseline adjustment — can reach opposite verdicts about an effect, because adjustment is a causal-modeling choice and the two answer different questions depending on whether baseline is itself caused by group membership.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:lords_paradox", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "lords_paradox"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "lords_paradox", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P031-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every complete instance compares two analyses of the same pre-post data and requires raw change scores versus baseline adjustment, so measurement-method difference is explicit and load-bearing."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A posterior equal to the Bayesian result would not collapse toward the likelihood and would fail the exact identity, so the value difference is constitutive.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Base Rate Fallacy", "one_liner": "The systematic human tendency to underweight or ignore the prior probability of a hypothesis when vivid, specific evidence is available, so a posterior estimate collapses toward the likelihood instead of tracking Bayes' rule.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:base_rate_fallacy", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "base_rate_fallacy"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "base_rate_fallacy", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P031-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact fallacy requires a posterior estimate that departs from Bayes' rule because the prior is underweighted or dropped. It therefore universally supplies plural compared values and a load-bearing value mismatch."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Compared items differ across scale, context, timing, category, population, measurement method, evidence quality, or value dimensions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P031-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O9"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an objectivity appearance without requiring that the artifact is objectively neutral.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The artifact appears objective.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require concealment or omission of the basis.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The artifact does not reveal its comparison basis.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a dashboard.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A dashboard is the focal artifact.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a rubric.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A rubric is the focal artifact.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a table.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "A table is the focal artifact.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a benchmark.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "A benchmark is the focal artifact.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a trial.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "A trial is the focal artifact.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a case method.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "A case method is the focal artifact.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a review process.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "A review process is the focal artifact.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}], "predicate": "An apparently objective dashboard, rubric, table, benchmark, trial, case method, or review hides its comparison basis.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A listed comparison artifact appears objective while hiding its comparison basis.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P031-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A comparison can declare every comparator and dimension explicitly, with no objectivity facade.", "slug": "comparison"}], "residual_id": "r:dimensioned_comparison_framing:b022_a03_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b022_a03_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A dashboard, rubric, table, benchmark, trial, case method, or review process appears objective but hides the comparison basis. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A dashboard, rubric, table, benchmark, trial, case method, or review process appears objective but hides the comparison basis."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A comparison can declare every comparator and dimension explicitly, with no objectivity facade.", "slug": "comparison"}], "normalized_requirement": "An apparently objective dashboard, rubric, table, benchmark, trial, case method, or review hides its comparison basis.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "An apparently objective dashboard, rubric, table, benchmark, trial, case method, or review hides its comparison basis.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P031-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve one option or alternative as the apparently superior item.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An option is the object receiving the favorable appearance.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve apparent superiority without asserting genuine dominance.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The option looks better rather than being established as better.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require self-serving or outcome-contingent frame selection.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A comparison-frame element is selected opportunistically.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the strict only-because direction, including loss of superiority under a non-opportunistic frame.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The opportunistic selection is the only reason the option looks better.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires opportunistic baseline selection.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The selected element is the baseline.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires opportunistic comparator-set selection.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The selected element is the comparator set.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires opportunistic selection of ordering as the comparison-frame element without imposing a temporal constraint.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The selected element is the ordering.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires opportunistic metric selection.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The selected element is the metric.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "An option looks better only because baseline, comparator set, ordering, or metric was selected opportunistically.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An option appears superior only because one comparison-frame element was selected opportunistically.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P031-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Comparison does not require opportunistic frame selection or a rank reversal caused by it.", "slug": "comparison"}], "residual_id": "r:dimensioned_comparison_framing:b022_a03_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b022_a03_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: One option looks better only because the baseline, comparator set, ordering, or metric was selected opportunistically. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["One option looks better only because the baseline, comparator set, ordering, or metric was selected opportunistically."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_GUARDED_EQUIVALENT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A current course that still wins under the fresh-start test is expressly outside the trap, while an innocently inherited baseline fails the guard; no qualifying complete instance can falsify the selected branch.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Status Quo Trap", "one_liner": "Frame status quo bias as a named trap a single deliberating actor can counter: recognise that the current course wins only because the switch must be defended while the staying is not, then run the fresh-start counterfactual that forces it to compete on its merits.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:status_quo_trap", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O3"], "guard_type": "OTHER", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "incumbent_baseline_selected_opportunistically", "predicate": "The incumbent comparison baseline was selected opportunistically.", "rationale": "The retained mapping passes universal necessity, object-role, modality, projection, and anti-restatement review."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "status_quo_trap"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The incumbent comparison baseline was selected opportunistically."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "status_quo_trap", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P031-C12-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact trap fires only when the current course wins because the switch alone bears justification and loses that advantage under fresh-start reframing. One atomic contingent fact supplies opportunistic baseline selection."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "An option looks better only because baseline, comparator set, ordering, or metric was selected opportunistically.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P031-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O9"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O10"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O11"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5", "O9"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5", "O10"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5", "O11"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6", "O9"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6", "O10"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6", "O11"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7", "O9"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7", "O10"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7", "O11"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O8", "O9"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O8", "O10"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O8", "O11"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O9", "O10"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O9", "O11"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O10", "O11"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve comparison or an equivalent analytic activity as the focal process.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A comparison activity is the bearer of the purposes.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail that the two purpose roles named in a satisfied branch are unseparated or conflated in the same comparison activity.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The two selected purposes are mixed in the same comparison activity.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve absence of a clear objective that selects or orders the purposes.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "No clear comparison objective governs the mixture.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfying this role must preserve similarity mapping as one of the purposes mixed in the comparison.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Similarity mapping is one selected comparison purpose.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfying this role must preserve difference finding as one of the purposes mixed in the comparison.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Difference finding is one selected comparison purpose.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfying this role must preserve evaluation as one of the purposes mixed in the comparison.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "Evaluation is one selected comparison purpose.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfying this role must preserve ranking as one of the purposes mixed in the comparison.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "Ranking is one selected comparison purpose.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfying this role must preserve causal inference as one of the purposes mixed in the comparison.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "Causal inference is one selected comparison purpose.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfying this role must preserve transfer as one of the purposes mixed in the comparison.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "Transfer is one selected comparison purpose.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfying this role must preserve teaching as one of the purposes mixed in the comparison.", "obligation_id": "O10", "statement": "Teaching is one selected comparison purpose.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfying this role must preserve trade-off analysis as one of the purposes mixed in the comparison.", "obligation_id": "O11", "statement": "Trade-off analysis is one selected comparison purpose.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}], "predicate": "Similarity, difference, evaluation, ranking, causal inference, transfer, teaching, or trade-off purposes are mixed without a clear comparison objective.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "At least two purposes from the eight-purpose source set are mixed without a clear governing comparison objective.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P031-C13-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A frame can serve one clear purpose; framing does not entail several comparison purposes being mixed.", "slug": "framing"}], "residual_id": "r:dimensioned_comparison_framing:b022_a03_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b022_a03_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The purpose of comparison is unclear: similarity mapping, difference finding, evaluation, ranking, causal inference, transfer, teaching, or trade-off analysis are being mixed. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The purpose of comparison is unclear: similarity mapping, difference finding, evaluation, ranking, causal inference, transfer, teaching, or trade-off analysis are being mixed."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A frame can serve one clear purpose; framing does not entail several comparison purposes being mixed.", "slug": "framing"}], "normalized_requirement": "Similarity, difference, evaluation, ranking, causal inference, transfer, teaching, or trade-off purposes are mixed without a clear comparison objective.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Similarity, difference, evaluation, ranking, causal inference, transfer, teaching, or trade-off purposes are mixed without a clear comparison objective.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A decision depends on choosing, ranking, prioritizing, judging, diagnosing, teaching, validating, benchmarking, or explaining relations among multiple items.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Decision and learning require compression across items, but compression becomes distortion when the comparison frame silently decides what counts as relevant sameness, difference, scale, and value. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: A decision depends on choosing, ranking, prioritizing, judging, diagnosing, teaching, validating, benchmarking, or explaining relations among multiple items. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A decision depends on choosing, ranking, prioritizing, judging, diagnosing, teaching, validating, benchmarking, or explaining relations among multiple items.", "Decision and learning require compression across items, but compression becomes distortion when the comparison frame silently decides what counts as relevant sameness, difference, scale, and value."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "A decision depends on choosing, ranking, prioritizing, judging, diagnosing, teaching, validating, benchmarking, or explaining relations among multiple items."}, {"display_text": "Stakeholders disagree not only about the answer but about what should be compared and along which dimensions.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Stakeholders disagree not only about the answer but about what should be compared and along which dimensions. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders disagree not only about the answer but about what should be compared and along which dimensions."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Stakeholders disagree not only about the answer but about what should be compared and along which dimensions."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 22, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-022", "ledger_sha256": "5ee4a2492fc5a9807f53a77363a79d1f55eb55ca3ec19db3ac3cab077686fe47"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": [{"groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A neutral contractor can annotate a boundary case without a stake in the classification answer, defeating DIRECT and the universal bridge; that instance fails the retained context guard.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Label Ambiguity", "one_liner": "Diagnose a headline accuracy figure as a blend of two measurements — model capability in the class interior where annotators agree, and mere adjudication agreement in the boundary zone where reasonable experts split — by stratifying metrics on the inter-annotator agreement rate.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:label_ambiguity", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "annotators_are_stakeholders", "predicate": "The reasonable expert annotators are stakeholders in the classification answer at issue.", "rationale": "The retained mapping passes universal necessity, object-role, modality, projection, and anti-restatement review."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "label_ambiguity"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The reasonable expert annotators are stakeholders in the classification answer at issue."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "label_ambiguity", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P031-C10-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record universally supplies answer-level expert disagreement. One atomic context restriction makes those already-present annotators stakeholders; a bridge was not used because annotator status alone does not generally entail an interest in the answer."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Two detached students can display naive realism while disputing an answer in a classroom exercise without being stakeholders; they fail the retained guard but preserve the unguarded DSA.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Naive Realism", "one_liner": "Explain intractable disagreement as the converging conviction that one perceives the world directly, that all rational observers would agree, and that dissenters must be biased — relocating the dispute from the facts to each party's invisible construction of them.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:naive_realism", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "disputants_are_stakeholders", "predicate": "The disagreeing agents are stakeholders in the substantive answer under dispute.", "rationale": "The retained mapping passes universal necessity, object-role, modality, projection, and anti-restatement review."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "naive_realism"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The disagreeing agents are stakeholders in the substantive answer under dispute."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "naive_realism", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P031-C10-U1", "why_it_fits": "Naive realism necessarily includes actual substantive dissent, but not every disputant is an interested stakeholder. The single actor-subtype guard closes that exact role gap without adding the disagreement."}], "publication_role": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT_ONLY", "source_residual_occurrence_id": "r:dimensioned_comparison_framing:b022_a03_c3", "unit": {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P031-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve multiple interested parties as the actors in the dispute.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Stakeholders are the disagreeing parties.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve disagreement at the substantive-answer level.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The stakeholders disagree about the answer.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Stakeholders disagree about the answer.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Stakeholders disagree about the substantive answer.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P031-C10-U1"}}]}
{"archetype": {"name": "Diminishing Returns Detection", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:diminishing_returns_detection", "slug": "diminishing_returns_detection"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 3 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is escalation by habit. A team, institution, model, campaign, or process keeps adding the same kind of input because early increments worked. But the easiest gains may already have been captured, the receptive audience may already have responded, the learner may be fatigued, the bottleneck may have moved, or the system may be absorbing more complexity than benefit.\n\nThis creates a misleading picture: cumulative output may still rise while the added output from each new increment falls. Without marginal visibility, decision-makers may defend continued escalation using old evidence rather than asking whether the current increment is still worthwhile.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Input continues to increase even though its positive marginal gain is declining, and aggregate improvement masks the shrinking benefit of each additional unit."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime varies input along a concave input-output curve and evaluates the smaller benefit produced by each additional unit.", "role_mapping": "Input increments -> x increments.", "slug": "diminishing_incremental_gains", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime varies one production input while other inputs are fixed and tracks its marginal product.", "role_mapping": "Input -> varied production factor; increments -> marginal changes.", "slug": "diminishing_returns", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b022_a04_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when a system is increasing an input in increments and the decision to continue has real consequences. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Input is being increased incrementally.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Input is being increased incrementally.", "Use this archetype when a system is increasing an input in increments and the decision to continue has real consequences."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Diminishing Incremental Gains", "one_liner": "Reduced benefit per unit.", "page_ref": "prime:diminishing_incremental_gains", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Input increments -> x increments.", "slug": "diminishing_incremental_gains", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime varies input along a concave input-output curve and evaluates the smaller benefit produced by each additional unit."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Diminishing Returns (Law of)", "one_liner": "Reduced output gains.", "page_ref": "prime:diminishing_returns", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Input -> varied production factor; increments -> marginal changes.", "slug": "diminishing_returns", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime varies one production input while other inputs are fixed and tracks its marginal product."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Input is being increased incrementally.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime requires declining positive marginal gain but does not require that an observer be misled by total improvement.", "slug": "diminishing_incremental_gains"}, {"falls_short_because": "The production law can be explicitly recognized and monitored; it does not require hidden marginal decline.", "slug": "diminishing_returns"}], "residual_id": "r:diminishing_returns_detection:b022_a04_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b022_a04_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Total improvement hides marginal decline. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Total improvement hides marginal decline."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime requires declining positive marginal gain but does not require that an observer be misled by total improvement.", "slug": "diminishing_incremental_gains"}, {"falls_short_because": "The production law can be explicitly recognized and monitored; it does not require hidden marginal decline.", "slug": "diminishing_returns"}], "normalized_requirement": "Total improvement hides a decline in marginal gain.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Total improvement hides a decline in marginal gain.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The system continues adding input because it assumes that aggregate improvement means the next increment remains worthwhile.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The system continues adding input because it assumes that aggregate improvement means the next increment remains worthwhile.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Output can be observed across increments.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This creates a misleading picture: cumulative output may still rise while the added output from each new increment falls. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: Output can be observed across increments. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Output can be observed across increments.", "This creates a misleading picture: cumulative output may still rise while the added output from each new increment falls."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "Output can be observed across increments."}, {"display_text": "Continuation has a real consequence.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when a system is increasing an input in increments and the decision to continue has real consequences. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Continuation has a real consequence. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Continuation has a real consequence.", "Use this archetype when a system is increasing an input in increments and the decision to continue has real consequences."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Continuation has a real consequence."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 22, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-022", "ledger_sha256": "5ee4a2492fc5a9807f53a77363a79d1f55eb55ca3ec19db3ac3cab077686fe47"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Diminishing Returns Diversification", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:diminishing_returns_diversification", "slug": "diminishing_returns_diversification"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 3 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is path concentration under declining marginal value. A system continues investing in one approach because it previously worked, because it is legible, because existing teams are organized around it, or because alternatives feel uncertain. The result is a familiar trap: past average return hides current marginal decline.\n\nThe problem becomes worse when alternatives are judged only by their initial size or certainty. New paths often look weaker at first because they have had less investment, weaker measurement, or less institutional sponsorship. Diminishing Returns Diversification creates a bounded exploration loop so alternatives can produce comparable evidence without destabilizing existing obligations.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Most new resources remain concentrated in one previously successful approach even though its marginal gains are declining and meaningfully independent alternatives remain underexplored."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P031-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a single approach or strategy as the focal recipient.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "One approach is the recipient of the concentrated allocation.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a majority share of new allocation, not merely a large or increasing share.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The approach receives most of the newly allocated resource.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the source perfect-progressive timing expressed by has been receiving.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The concentrated allocation began previously and continues into the present.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires most new effort to go to the approach.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Effort is the concentrated resource.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires most new budget to go to the approach.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Budget is the concentrated resource.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires most new attention to go to the approach.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "Attention is the concentrated resource.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires most new capacity to go to the approach.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "Capacity is the concentrated resource.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires most new strategic commitment to go to the approach.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "Strategic commitment is the concentrated resource.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "One approach receives most new effort, budget, attention, capacity, or strategic commitment.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "One approach has been receiving most new resources of one listed type.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P031-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Diminishing returns can occur while resources are evenly allocated across several approaches.", "slug": "diminishing_returns"}], "residual_id": "r:diminishing_returns_diversification:b022_a05_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b022_a05_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: One approach has been receiving most new effort, budget, attention, capacity, or strategic commitment. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["One approach has been receiving most new effort, budget, attention, capacity, or strategic commitment."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Diminishing returns can occur while resources are evenly allocated across several approaches.", "slug": "diminishing_returns"}], "normalized_requirement": "One approach receives most new effort, budget, attention, capacity, or strategic commitment.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "One approach receives most new effort, budget, attention, capacity, or strategic commitment.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires each additional unit of input to produce a smaller positive gain along a concave relation.", "role_mapping": "Dominant-approach input -> x; declining marginal gains -> f prime decreasing.", "slug": "diminishing_incremental_gains", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime requires marginal product of a varied input to decline while other factors remain fixed.", "role_mapping": "Additional input -> varied factor; marginal gain -> marginal product.", "slug": "diminishing_returns", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b022_a05_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Additional input into that dominant approach produces declining marginal gains. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Additional input into that dominant approach produces declining marginal gains."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Diminishing Incremental Gains", "one_liner": "Reduced benefit per unit.", "page_ref": "prime:diminishing_incremental_gains", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Dominant-approach input -> x; declining marginal gains -> f prime decreasing.", "slug": "diminishing_incremental_gains", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires each additional unit of input to produce a smaller positive gain along a concave relation."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Diminishing Returns (Law of)", "one_liner": "Reduced output gains.", "page_ref": "prime:diminishing_returns", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Additional input -> varied factor; marginal gain -> marginal product.", "slug": "diminishing_returns", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires marginal product of a varied input to decline while other factors remain fixed."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Additional input into the dominant approach produces declining marginal gains.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The allocation remains concentrated even though independent alternatives have higher or insufficiently tested marginal yield.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The allocation remains concentrated even though independent alternatives have higher or insufficiently tested marginal yield.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Meaningfully independent alternatives are available or can be created.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The archetype manages this tension by requiring a declining-return trigger, bounded exploration, independent alternatives, and rebalancing discipline. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: Meaningfully independent alternatives are available or can be created. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Meaningfully independent alternatives are available or can be created.", "The archetype manages this tension by requiring a declining-return trigger, bounded exploration, independent alternatives, and rebalancing discipline."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Meaningfully independent alternatives are available or can be created."}, {"display_text": "The system can allocate a bounded exploration budget without violating protected obligations.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Diminishing Returns Diversification creates a bounded exploration loop so alternatives can produce comparable evidence without destabilizing existing obligations. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: The system can allocate a bounded exploration budget without violating protected obligations. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The system can allocate a bounded exploration budget without violating protected obligations.", "Diminishing Returns Diversification creates a bounded exploration loop so alternatives can produce comparable evidence without destabilizing existing obligations."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The system can allocate a bounded exploration budget without violating protected obligations."}, {"display_text": "Evidence from alternatives can inform future rebalancing.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The archetype manages this tension by requiring a declining-return trigger, bounded exploration, independent alternatives, and rebalancing discipline. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: Evidence from alternatives can inform future rebalancing. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Evidence from alternatives can inform future rebalancing.", "The archetype manages this tension by requiring a declining-return trigger, bounded exploration, independent alternatives, and rebalancing discipline."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Evidence from alternatives can inform future rebalancing."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 22, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-022", "ledger_sha256": "5ee4a2492fc5a9807f53a77363a79d1f55eb55ca3ec19db3ac3cab077686fe47"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Directed Asymmetry Mapping and Calibration", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:directed_asymmetry_mapping_and_calibration", "slug": "directed_asymmetry_mapping_and_calibration"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 3, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 2, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 2 of 3 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system treats the two sides of a relation as interchangeable when they are not, or treats them differently without showing that the difference is relevant. False symmetry can burden the weaker, less informed, downstream, or higher-risk side; unjustified asymmetry can entrench power, bias, extraction, or arbitrary privilege. Because the relation is described with unordered language, the direction of leverage, obligation, exposure, or meaning remains hidden until failure occurs.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A directional relation is treated symmetrically despite non-interchangeable sides, or differentiated treatment is imposed without a relevant-difference warrant."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires relata in a directed relation whose roles are not invariant under exchange.", "role_mapping": "Sides -> relata; directional differences -> swap-test failure.", "slug": "asymmetry", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b022_a06_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Examples include buyer/seller, sender/receiver, attacker/defender, claimant/evaluator, upstream/downstream, marked/unmarked, principal/agent, source/receptor, and prover/verifier. In this condition set, the requirement is: A relation has sides whose roles, capabilities, costs, risks, authority, information, or semantic status differ by direction.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A relation has two or more sides whose roles, capabilities, costs, risks, authority, information, or semantic status differ by direction."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Asymmetry", "one_liner": "Directed imbalance in a relation whose two sides are not interchangeable under swap.", "page_ref": "prime:asymmetry", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Sides -> relata; directional differences -> swap-test failure.", "slug": "asymmetry", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires relata in a directed relation whose roles are not invariant under exchange."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A relation has sides whose roles, capabilities, costs, risks, authority, information, or semantic status differ by direction.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires an even-handed procedure sold as neutral despite an asymmetric underlying state, producing predictable distortion.", "role_mapping": "Equal treatment -> symmetry-preserving procedure; fairness assumption -> claimed neutrality.", "slug": "symmetric_response_to_asymmetric_state", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b022_a06_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Equal inputs into unequal states can reproduce or amplify the initial difference. In this condition set, the requirement is: A policy, metric, interface, or moral rule assumes equal treatment is automatically fair or efficient.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A policy, metric, interface, or moral rule assumes that equal treatment is automatically fair or efficient."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Symmetric Response to Asymmetric State", "one_liner": "Equal treatment of an unequal state distorts toward the weaker side.", "page_ref": "prime:symmetric_response_to_asymmetric_state", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Equal treatment -> symmetry-preserving procedure; fairness assumption -> claimed neutrality.", "slug": "symmetric_response_to_asymmetric_state", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires an even-handed procedure sold as neutral despite an asymmetric underlying state, producing predictable distortion."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A policy, metric, interface, or moral rule assumes equal treatment is automatically fair or efficient.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P031-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an institutional, procedural, or technical system as the treatment-differentiating actor.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A system is the actor allocating treatment.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail unequal or different treatment of at least two comparable recipients.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The system gives differentiated treatment across cases or parties.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require absence of an explicit justification, not merely dispute over an articulated warrant.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "No explicit warrant for the differential treatment is supplied.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve relevance of recipient or case differences as the required justification basis.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The missing warrant would need to identify a relevant difference.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "A system differentiates treatment without an explicit relevant-difference warrant.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A system differentiates treatment without an explicit warrant grounded in a relevant difference.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P031-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime concerns a symmetric procedure applied to an asymmetric state, the opposite treatment direction from unwarranted differentiation.", "slug": "symmetric_response_to_asymmetric_state"}], "residual_id": "r:directed_asymmetry_mapping_and_calibration:b022_a06_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b022_a06_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The issue may be unjustified privilege, stigma, burden shifting, or hidden discrimination. In this condition set, the requirement is: A system differentiates treatment without an explicit relevant-difference warrant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A system differentiates treatment but lacks an explicit relevant-difference warrant."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime concerns a symmetric procedure applied to an asymmetric state, the opposite treatment direction from unwarranted differentiation.", "slug": "symmetric_response_to_asymmetric_state"}], "normalized_requirement": "A system differentiates treatment without an explicit relevant-difference warrant.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A system differentiates treatment without an explicit relevant-difference warrant.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires relata in a directed relation whose roles are not invariant under exchange.", "role_mapping": "Sides -> relata; directional differences -> swap-test failure.", "slug": "asymmetry", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b022_a06_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Examples include buyer/seller, sender/receiver, attacker/defender, claimant/evaluator, upstream/downstream, marked/unmarked, principal/agent, source/receptor, and prover/verifier. In this condition set, the requirement is: A relation has sides whose roles, capabilities, costs, risks, authority, information, or semantic status differ by direction.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A relation has two or more sides whose roles, capabilities, costs, risks, authority, information, or semantic status differ by direction."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Asymmetry", "one_liner": "Directed imbalance in a relation whose two sides are not interchangeable under swap.", "page_ref": "prime:asymmetry", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Sides -> relata; directional differences -> swap-test failure.", "slug": "asymmetry", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires relata in a directed relation whose roles are not invariant under exchange."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A relation has sides whose roles, capabilities, costs, risks, authority, information, or semantic status differ by direction.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires sharply unequal costs for the two classification errors, with one forbidden and the other tolerable.", "role_mapping": "One-sided costs -> error-cost asymmetry.", "slug": "asymmetric_screening", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b022_a06_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A cheap action for one side may force expensive correction, verification, recovery, or adaptation by the other side. In this condition set, the requirement is: Costs or risks are strongly one-sided.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Costs or risks are strongly one-sided."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Asymmetric Screening", "one_liner": "A cheap, deliberately one-sided-error filter gates an expensive authoritative check.", "page_ref": "prime:asymmetric_screening", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "One-sided costs -> error-cost asymmetry.", "slug": "asymmetric_screening", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires sharply unequal costs for the two classification errors, with one forbidden and the other tolerable."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Costs or risks are strongly one-sided.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The direction of flow, authority, visibility, or accountability matters.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Some interventions work only if the relation is oriented correctly. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The direction of flow, authority, visibility, or accountability matters. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The direction of flow, authority, visibility, or accountability matters.", "Some interventions work only if the relation is oriented correctly."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The direction of flow, authority, visibility, or accountability matters."}, {"display_text": "A named child asymmetry appears but the broader relation design has not been reviewed.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Information asymmetry, opportunity asymmetry, markedness, verifier-prover asymmetry, and asymmetric attack-defense cost are special cases that may require the general map first. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: A named child asymmetry appears but the broader relation design has not been reviewed. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A named child asymmetry appears but the broader relation design has not been reviewed.", "Information asymmetry, opportunity asymmetry, markedness, verifier-prover asymmetry, and asymmetric attack-defense cost are special cases that may require the general map first."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "A named child asymmetry appears but the broader relation design has not been reviewed."}, {"display_text": "Stakeholders disagree about whether an observed imbalance is a legitimate specialization, a harmful inequity, or a necessary design constraint.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The archetype creates a reviewable record instead of letting the strongest party define relevance. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Stakeholders disagree about whether an observed imbalance is a legitimate specialization, a harmful inequity, or a necessary design constraint. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders disagree about whether an observed imbalance is a legitimate specialization, a harmful inequity, or a necessary design constraint.", "The archetype creates a reviewable record instead of letting the strongest party define relevance."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "Stakeholders disagree about whether an observed imbalance is a legitimate specialization, a harmful inequity, or a necessary design constraint."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 22, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-022", "ledger_sha256": "5ee4a2492fc5a9807f53a77363a79d1f55eb55ca3ec19db3ac3cab077686fe47"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Discourse Window Recalibration", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:discourse_window_recalibration", "slug": "discourse_window_recalibration"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 3, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 2, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 2, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 2 of 3 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A viable or risky position sits outside the current social boundary of discussability, or a position is moving inside the boundary through repetition without a deliberate legitimacy decision.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Social expression costs suppress privately held positions outside the current sayability boundary, or repeated exposure normalizes a formerly excluded position faster than its evidential and legitimacy review."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a privately held judgment, asymmetric expression cost, and a cheaper public expression or silence that preserves the held view.", "role_mapping": "Private acknowledgement -> held preference; avoidance -> strategically cheaper expression.", "slug": "preference_falsification", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime requires private positions whose perceived-minority holders suppress public expression because they anticipate social cost.", "role_mapping": "Private view -> private position; public avoidance -> suppression gate.", "slug": "spiral_of_silence", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b022_a07_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: People privately acknowledge an option, risk, or question but avoid naming it publicly because the social cost is high. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["People privately acknowledge an option, risk, or question but avoid naming it publicly because the social cost is high."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Preference Falsification", "one_liner": "Under asymmetric cost on expression, agents voice a cheaper preference than the one they privately hold, so the visible distribution diverges from the held one.", "page_ref": "prime:preference_falsification", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Private acknowledgement -> held preference; avoidance -> strategically cheaper expression.", "slug": "preference_falsification", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a privately held judgment, asymmetric expression cost, and a cheaper public expression or silence that preserves the held view."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Spiral Of Silence In Publics", "one_liner": "A self-reinforcing loop in which people infer the climate of opinion from visible expression and those who believe themselves in the minority suppress their own, steepening the apparent consensus away from the underlying private distribution.", "page_ref": "prime:spiral_of_silence", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Private view -> private position; public avoidance -> suppression gate.", "slug": "spiral_of_silence", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires private positions whose perceived-minority holders suppress public expression because they anticipate social cost."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "People privately acknowledge a position, risk, or question but avoid naming it publicly because expression is socially costly.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P032-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a social or discursive position as the object of familiarization.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A position is the object becoming familiar.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the earlier exclusion or unthinkability, not only present familiarity.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The position was formerly unthinkable.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an ongoing increase in familiarity, not merely repeated mention with no familiarization.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The position is becoming familiar.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve recurrence or repeated exposure rather than a single presentation.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Exposure to the position occurs repeatedly.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve repetition as the mechanism of familiarization.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The repetition produces the increasing familiarity.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "A once-unthinkable position is becoming familiar through repetition.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Repeated exposure makes a formerly unthinkable position increasingly familiar.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P032-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Rapid reuse and adaptation of discourse does not require movement across a social sayability boundary or prior unthinkability.", "slug": "rhetorical_velocity"}], "residual_id": "r:discourse_window_recalibration:b022_a07_c2a", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b022_a07_c2a", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A once-unthinkable position is becoming familiar through repetition faster than evidence, safeguards, or affected-party review can catch up. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A once-unthinkable position is becoming familiar through repetition faster than evidence, safeguards, or affected-party review can catch up."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Attempted to preserve the exact record and qualifier while falsifying the selected DNF branch; the atomic qualifier closes the only gap, so no counterexample remains: Bare repetition necessarily raises processing fluency or felt familiarity; the one candidate-anchored timing qualifier adds only that the repeated position was formerly unthinkable.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Ad Nauseam (Argument from Repetition)", "one_liner": "Diagnose the fallacy of treating a claim as established by bare repetition, where frequency raises felt credibility through processing fluency while adding zero new evidential warrant.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:ad_nauseam", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2"], "guard_type": "TIMING_BINDING", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "claim_formerly_unthinkable", "predicate": "The repeatedly asserted claim was formerly excluded as an unthinkable social position.", "rationale": "The context qualifier is one atomic candidate-role fact, does not restate the head, and is sufficient for all guardable gaps. Bare repetition necessarily raises processing fluency or felt familiarity; the one candidate-anchored timing qualifier adds only that the repeated position was formerly unthinkable."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "ad_nauseam"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "claim_formerly_unthinkable"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "ad_nauseam", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P032-C03-U1", "why_it_fits": "Bare repetition necessarily raises processing fluency or felt familiarity; the one candidate-anchored timing qualifier adds only that the repeated position was formerly unthinkable."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A formerly unthinkable position becomes familiar through repetition.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P032-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve increasing familiarity or normalization as the process moving ahead.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Familiarization is the advancing process.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the rate or timing asymmetry with familiarization ahead.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Familiarization advances faster than the selected comparator can catch up.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve the evidential basis or development of evidence as what fails to keep pace, not merely an evidential review process.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The lagging comparator is evidence or the development of evidence.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve safeguards or their development as what fails to keep pace, not a generic review process.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The lagging comparator is safeguards or the development of safeguards.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve both affected-party standing and review as what fails to keep pace.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The lagging comparator is review by affected parties.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Familiarization outpaces evidence, safeguards, or affected-party review.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Familiarization advances faster than evidence, safeguards, or affected-party review can catch up.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P032-C04-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Rhetorical material can travel rapidly while evidence and safeguards keep pace; the comparative lag is not mandatory.", "slug": "rhetorical_velocity"}], "residual_id": "r:discourse_window_recalibration:b022_a07_c2b", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b022_a07_c2b", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A once-unthinkable position is becoming familiar through repetition faster than evidence, safeguards, or affected-party review can catch up. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A once-unthinkable position is becoming familiar through repetition faster than evidence, safeguards, or affected-party review can catch up."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Attempted to preserve every exact-record role while falsifying the selected DNF branch, but the candidate identity necessarily supplies all selected obligations: Every ad-nauseam instance advances familiarity through repetition while adding no evidential development, so familiarization necessarily outruns evidence.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Ad Nauseam (Argument from Repetition)", "one_liner": "Diagnose the fallacy of treating a claim as established by bare repetition, where frequency raises felt credibility through processing fluency while adding zero new evidential warrant.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:ad_nauseam", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "ad_nauseam"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "ad_nauseam", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P032-C04-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every ad-nauseam instance advances familiarity through repetition while adding no evidential development, so familiarization necessarily outruns evidence."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Familiarization outpaces evidence, safeguards, or affected-party review.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P032-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve actors constrained in what they can discuss or respond to.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Actors are the entities experiencing compression.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve movement in the underlying reality rather than two static boundaries.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The relevant reality is advancing or changing.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the norm's non-adjustment while reality advances.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The permissible-discussion norm remains fixed.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a discourse or sayability boundary, not an unrelated fixed constraint.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The fixed norm governs what may be discussed.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve both sides and the narrowing room between them.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The actors are compressed between the advancing reality and the fixed norm.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must attribute the compression to the fixed permissible-discussion boundary in the advancing context.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The discourse boundary produces the actors' compression.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "A discourse boundary is producing coastal-squeeze effects: actors are compressed between an advancing reality and a fixed norm of what is permissible to discuss.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Actors are compressed between an advancing reality and a fixed permissible-discussion norm.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P032-C05-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact prime additionally requires an immobile subject, no exit, monotonic range compression, and a viability threshold, and it need not occur in discourse.", "slug": "coastal_squeeze"}], "residual_id": "r:discourse_window_recalibration:b022_a07_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b022_a07_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A discourse boundary is producing coastal-squeeze effects: actors are compressed between an advancing reality and a fixed norm of what is permissible to discuss. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A discourse boundary is producing coastal-squeeze effects: actors are compressed between an advancing reality and a fixed norm of what is permissible to discuss."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact prime additionally requires an immobile subject, no exit, monotonic range compression, and a viability threshold, and it need not occur in discourse.", "slug": "coastal_squeeze"}], "normalized_requirement": "Actors are compressed between an advancing reality and a fixed norm of what may be discussed.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Actors are compressed between an advancing reality and a fixed norm of what may be discussed.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "DISJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A group needs to consider adjacent possibilities without immediately treating them as endorsed decisions.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: A group needs to consider adjacent possibilities without immediately treating them as endorsed decisions. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A group needs to consider adjacent possibilities without immediately treating them as endorsed decisions."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "A group needs to consider adjacent possibilities without immediately treating them as endorsed decisions."}, {"display_text": "The relevant boundary is informal, reputational, or cultural rather than only a formal rule.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The relevant boundary is informal, reputational, or cultural rather than only a formal rule. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The relevant boundary is informal, reputational, or cultural rather than only a formal rule."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The relevant boundary is informal, reputational, or cultural rather than only a formal rule."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 22, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-022", "ledger_sha256": "5ee4a2492fc5a9807f53a77363a79d1f55eb55ca3ec19db3ac3cab077686fe47"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Discrete Commitment Optimization", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:discrete_commitment_optimization", "slug": "discrete_commitment_optimization"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 2, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is false continuity. Decision-makers may reason as if options can be partially funded, smoothly adjusted, or independently ranked, while the real world demands whole commitments. A fractional or locally attractive answer then fails at implementation: projects cannot be half-launched, coverage requirements are missed, dependencies are broken, or a rounded answer violates capacity.\n\nA second structural problem is bundle interaction. Each option may look good alone, but the selected set can be poor because choices share budgets, staff, space, deadlines, political legitimacy, or technical dependencies. Discrete commitment problems therefore require combination-level feasibility, not just option-level scoring.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A decision contains indivisible or integer commitments coupled by constraints, but it is treated as smoothly divisible, fractionally allocable, or separable one option at a time."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires discrete choices represented by integer or binary decision variables, which cannot take arbitrary fractional values.", "role_mapping": "Indivisible option -> integer or binary decision variable.", "slug": "integer_linear_programming_ilp", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b022_a08_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A decision involves indivisible commitments, assignments, selections, placements, or whole-number quantities, but decision-makers treat the problem as if options could be smoothly ranked, fractionally allocated, or considered one at a time. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Options are indivisible or all-or-nothing.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Options are indivisible or all-or-nothing.", "A decision involves indivisible commitments, assignments, selections, placements, or whole-number quantities, but decision-makers treat the problem as if options could be smoothly ranked, fractionally allocated, or considered one at a time."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Integer Linear Programming (ILP)", "one_liner": "Discrete optimization with integer variables.", "page_ref": "prime:integer_linear_programming_ilp", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Indivisible option -> integer or binary decision variable.", "slug": "integer_linear_programming_ilp", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires discrete choices represented by integer or binary decision variables, which cannot take arbitrary fractional values."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Options are indivisible or all-or-nothing.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P032-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve more than one choice or decision variable.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Multiple choices are involved.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve constraints applying jointly to multiple choices rather than separate unary limits.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Constraints are shared across the choices.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve non-separability created by the shared constraints.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The choices interact or are coupled through the shared constraints.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Choices interact through shared constraints.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Multiple choices are coupled by constraints they share.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P032-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An ILP can consist of separable integer variables with unary bounds; integrality and linear constraints do not require inter-choice coupling.", "slug": "integer_linear_programming_ilp"}], "residual_id": "r:discrete_commitment_optimization:b022_a08_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b022_a08_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The system must commit to whole choices while objectives and constraints span across those choices. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Choices interact through shared constraints.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Choices interact through shared constraints.", "The system must commit to whole choices while objectives and constraints span across those choices."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Attempted to preserve every exact-record role while falsifying the selected DNF branch, but the candidate identity necessarily supplies all selected obligations: The exact dependency closure is a nonseparable constraint system over multiple version choices.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Dependency Hell", "one_liner": "The pathological state where a project's transitive dependency closure holds mutually incompatible version constraints, turning installation into an NP-complete constraint-satisfaction problem that no edge-level patch can resolve.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:dependency_hell", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "dependency_hell"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "dependency_hell", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P032-C06-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact dependency closure is a nonseparable constraint system over multiple version choices."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Attempted to preserve every exact-record role while falsifying the selected DNF branch, but the candidate identity necessarily supplies all selected obligations: Each attendance choice changes the aggregate relative to one shared capacity limit and thereby changes every agents payoff.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "El Farol Bar Problem", "one_liner": "The congestion model in which each agent independently decides whether to attend a capacity-limited bar, enjoyable only if uncrowded — so any prediction rule shared by all self-destructs, and the system resolves only through heterogeneous inductive predictors rather than convergence.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:el_farol_bar_problem", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "el_farol_bar_problem"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "el_farol_bar_problem", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P032-C06-U1", "why_it_fits": "Each attendance choice changes the aggregate relative to one shared capacity limit and thereby changes every agents payoff."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Attempted to preserve every exact-record role while falsifying the selected DNF branch, but the candidate identity necessarily supplies all selected obligations: The unanimous-consent rule necessarily couples all participation choices through one jointly applied constraint.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Holdout Problem", "one_liner": "The bargaining failure in which a complementary surplus requiring unanimous consent lets any pivotal, non-substitutable party refuse agreement and extract a disproportionate share as the price of consent — making rational extraction, not bad faith, the equilibrium.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:holdout_problem", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "holdout_problem"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "holdout_problem", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P032-C06-U1", "why_it_fits": "The unanimous-consent rule necessarily couples all participation choices through one jointly applied constraint."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Choices interact through shared constraints.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The distinguishing commitment of ILP is that some variables are restricted to integer or binary values rather than the continuous LP relaxation.", "role_mapping": "Whole-number quantity -> integer variable; commitment -> binary variable.", "slug": "integer_linear_programming_ilp", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b022_a08_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when choices are indivisible, when whole-number quantities matter, or when assignments and placements must be made as complete commitments. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Whole-number quantities, slots, or commitments are required.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Whole-number quantities, slots, or commitments are required.", "Use this archetype when choices are indivisible, when whole-number quantities matter, or when assignments and placements must be made as complete commitments."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Integer Linear Programming (ILP)", "one_liner": "Discrete optimization with integer variables.", "page_ref": "prime:integer_linear_programming_ilp", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Whole-number quantity -> integer variable; commitment -> binary variable.", "slug": "integer_linear_programming_ilp", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The distinguishing commitment of ILP is that some variables are restricted to integer or binary values rather than the continuous LP relaxation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Whole-number quantities, slots, or commitments are required.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P032-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"], ["O1", "O3"], ["O1", "O4"], ["O1", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an active constraint that restricts admissible outcomes, not a merely relevant consideration.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The selected constraint is binding on the focal decision or configuration.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve fairness as the constraint domain.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The binding constraint concerns fairness.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve eligibility as the constraint domain.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The binding constraint concerns eligibility.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve compatibility as the constraint domain.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The binding constraint concerns compatibility.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve exclusion as the constraint domain.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The binding constraint concerns exclusion.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Fairness, eligibility, compatibility, or exclusion constraints bind.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "One listed constraint type is binding.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P032-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "ILP constraints may concern only budget, balance, flow, or capacity and need not instantiate any listed normative or compatibility constraint.", "slug": "integer_linear_programming_ilp"}], "residual_id": "r:discrete_commitment_optimization:b022_a08_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b022_a08_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Fairness, eligibility, compatibility, or exclusion constraints bind. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Fairness, eligibility, compatibility, or exclusion constraints bind."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Attempted to preserve every exact-record role while falsifying the selected DNF branch, but the candidate identity necessarily supplies all selected obligations: Every dependency-hell instance has compatibility constraints that actively make the global assignment infeasible.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Dependency Hell", "one_liner": "The pathological state where a project's transitive dependency closure holds mutually incompatible version constraints, turning installation into an NP-complete constraint-satisfaction problem that no edge-level patch can resolve.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:dependency_hell", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "dependency_hell"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "dependency_hell", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P032-C07-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every dependency-hell instance has compatibility constraints that actively make the global assignment infeasible."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Attempted to preserve every exact-record role while falsifying the selected DNF branch, but the candidate identity necessarily supplies all selected obligations: Every navigation loop actively excludes the goal state from the reachable set under the current graph constraints.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Navigation loop", "one_liner": "Diagnose a workflow where a user cannot reach their goal by modeling the interface as a directed graph and asking one structural question — is any goal state reachable from the current state? — rather than blaming screen quality or user confusion.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:navigation_loop", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "navigation_loop"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "navigation_loop", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P032-C07-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every navigation loop actively excludes the goal state from the reachable set under the current graph constraints."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Attempted to preserve every exact-record role while falsifying the selected DNF branch, but the candidate identity necessarily supplies all selected obligations: Every holdout configuration has an active consent rule that excludes otherwise feasible joint outcomes.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Holdout Problem", "one_liner": "The bargaining failure in which a complementary surplus requiring unanimous consent lets any pivotal, non-substitutable party refuse agreement and extract a disproportionate share as the price of consent — making rational extraction, not bad faith, the equilibrium.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:holdout_problem", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "holdout_problem"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "holdout_problem", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P032-C07-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every holdout configuration has an active consent rule that excludes otherwise feasible joint outcomes."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Attempted to preserve every exact-record role while falsifying the selected DNF branch, but the candidate identity necessarily supplies all selected obligations: Every problem-solution-fit instance is an operative go-no-go eligibility gate with a default of no until its evidence criterion is met.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Problem-Solution Fit", "one_liner": "The lean-startup gate that demands cheap, need-side evidence — a real, important problem for an identified user, and a solution preferred over their current workaround — before committing to build at scale, guarding against 'build it and they will come.'", "page_ref": "domain_specific:problem_solution_fit", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "problem_solution_fit"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "problem_solution_fit", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P032-C07-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every problem-solution-fit instance is an operative go-no-go eligibility gate with a default of no until its evidence criterion is met."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Attempted to preserve every exact-record role while falsifying the selected DNF branch, but the candidate identity necessarily supplies all selected obligations: The exact refinement admits only equilibria satisfying the tremble-limit criterion, an active eligibility constraint.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Trembling-Hand Perfect Equilibrium", "one_liner": "Filter the Nash equilibria by giving every action a vanishing positive probability of being played by mistake and keeping only those that survive as the tremble shrinks to zero, discarding equilibria propped up by threats that never have to be carried out.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:trembling_hand_perfect_equilibrium", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "trembling_hand_perfect_equilibrium"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "trembling_hand_perfect_equilibrium", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P032-C07-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact refinement admits only equilibria satisfying the tremble-limit criterion, an active eligibility constraint."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Attempted to preserve every exact-record role while falsifying the selected DNF branch, but the candidate identity necessarily supplies all selected obligations: Every FLP instance establishes that the listed system assumptions and simultaneous guarantees are incompatible.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "FLP Impossibility", "one_liner": "Prove that no deterministic algorithm can guarantee both agreement and termination for consensus in an asynchronous system with even one crash-fault — by showing an adversarial message schedule can keep the system perpetually undecided.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:flp_impossibility", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "flp_impossibility"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "flp_impossibility", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P032-C07-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every FLP instance establishes that the listed system assumptions and simultaneous guarantees are incompatible."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Attempted to preserve every exact-record role while falsifying the selected DNF branch, but the candidate identity necessarily supplies all selected obligations: The exact record already makes competing overlapping edits incompatible with automatic coexistence, so the proposed bridge is general but unnecessary.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Merge Conflict", "one_liner": "Halt an automatic merge and hand the decision to a human exactly where two branches diverged from their common ancestor on the same region, because a three-way merge over text can rank a one-sided edit but has no syntactic basis to choose between two competing edits whose correctness lives in intent it cannot see.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:merge_conflict", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "merge_conflict"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "merge_conflict", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P032-C07-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record already makes competing overlapping edits incompatible with automatic coexistence, so the proposed bridge is general but unnecessary."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Attempted to preserve every exact-record role while falsifying the selected DNF branch, but the candidate identity necessarily supplies all selected obligations: Every halting-problem instance excludes the claimed total decider under the stated expressive substrate.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Halting Problem", "one_liner": "Turing's proof that no general algorithm can decide, for every program-input pair, whether the program halts or loops forever — established by a diagonal argument that builds an adversary doing the opposite of any claimed decider's prediction about itself.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:halting_problem", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "halting_problem"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "halting_problem", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P032-C07-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every halting-problem instance excludes the claimed total decider under the stated expressive substrate."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Attempted to preserve every exact-record role while falsifying the selected DNF branch, but the candidate identity necessarily supplies all selected obligations: Each goalpost-shifting instance applies an active evidential eligibility standard and revises it when evidence qualifies.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Moving the goalposts", "one_liner": "An argumentative pattern in which, on being shown evidence that meets a previously stipulated standard, one party revises the standard upward to block the conclusion rather than accept it — repeated so that no finite evidence can settle the question.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:moving_the_goalposts", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "moving_the_goalposts"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "moving_the_goalposts", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P032-C07-U1", "why_it_fits": "Each goalpost-shifting instance applies an active evidential eligibility standard and revises it when evidence qualifies."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Fairness, eligibility, compatibility, or exclusion constraints bind.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "Decision-makers currently use a fractional, smoothly ranked, or one-option-at-a-time treatment that violates the discrete coupled structure.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Decision-makers currently use a fractional, smoothly ranked, or one-option-at-a-time treatment that violates the discrete coupled structure.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The number of feasible combinations is too large for informal enumeration.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The archetype does not require a formal solver, but it does require explicit representation of the choice units, constraints, feasible combinations, and selection rule. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The number of feasible combinations is too large for informal enumeration. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The number of feasible combinations is too large for informal enumeration.", "The archetype does not require a formal solver, but it does require explicit representation of the choice units, constraints, feasible combinations, and selection rule."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "The number of feasible combinations is too large for informal enumeration."}, {"display_text": "Selected commitments create durable implementation consequences.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Treating options independently creates local appeal but can produce globally infeasible, dominated, unfair, or strategically poor commitment bundles. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Selected commitments create durable implementation consequences. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Selected commitments create durable implementation consequences.", "Treating options independently creates local appeal but can produce globally infeasible, dominated, unfair, or strategically poor commitment bundles."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Selected commitments create durable implementation consequences."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 22, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-022", "ledger_sha256": "5ee4a2492fc5a9807f53a77363a79d1f55eb55ca3ec19db3ac3cab077686fe47"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Discrete–Continuous Model Selection", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:discrete_continuous_model_selection", "slug": "discrete_continuous_model_selection"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 2, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 2, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 2 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 2 of 2 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 2}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is wrong granularity. A process is represented at a level of discreteness or continuity that does not match the decision. The result may be false smoothness, where important jumps disappear into averages; false discreteness, where continuous variation is chopped into arbitrary categories; or hybrid confusion, where people switch between step and flow reasoning without knowing when or why.\n\nThis problem appears in operations, policy, software, clinical monitoring, education, finance, manufacturing, risk management, and organizational design. In each domain, the representation changes what counts as a transition, what gets measured, when action occurs, and who is accountable for boundary cases.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A representation imposes the wrong discrete or continuous granularity, manufacturing bucket artifacts or failing when scale and cadence change."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires an underlying continuum bucketed by chosen breakpoints, producing apparent structure that contaminates downstream inference.", "role_mapping": "Arbitrary bins -> bucketing transformation; distorted action -> inference contamination.", "slug": "discretization_induced_artifact", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b022_a09_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Current representations smooth over rare but consequential events, or split a smooth process into arbitrary bins that distort action. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Current representations smooth over rare but consequential events, or split a smooth process into arbitrary bins that distort action."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Discretization-Induced Artifact", "one_liner": "Converting a continuous quantity into discrete buckets produces apparent structure that is a property of the bucket boundaries rather than of the underlying phenomenon.", "page_ref": "prime:discretization_induced_artifact", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Arbitrary bins -> bucketing transformation; distorted action -> inference contamination.", "slug": "discretization_induced_artifact", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires an underlying continuum bucketed by chosen breakpoints, producing apparent structure that contaminates downstream inference."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The current representation smooths over rare consequential events or bins a smooth process in a way that distorts action.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P032-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a model or representation as the entity whose performance changes.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A model is the affected representation.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve prior success in a specified scale regime.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The model previously worked at one scale.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve actual failure rather than merely reduced confidence.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The model fails in the changed regime.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the temporal or conditional link between the change and failure.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The failure occurs when the selected operating factor changes.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve a change in how frequently observations occur.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The changed factor is observation cadence.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve a change in the underlying process rate.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The changed factor is process speed.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve changed stakes or effects of cases near a boundary.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The changed factor is the consequence of boundary cases.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "A model that worked at one scale fails when the observation cadence, process speed, or consequence of boundary cases changes.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A formerly successful model fails when one listed operating factor changes.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P032-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A discretization artifact can be present at one fixed scale and cadence and does not require a formerly successful model or environmental change.", "slug": "discretization_induced_artifact"}], "residual_id": "r:discrete_continuous_model_selection:b022_a09_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b022_a09_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A model that worked at one scale fails when the observation cadence, process speed, or consequence of boundary cases changes. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A model that worked at one scale fails when the observation cadence, process speed, or consequence of boundary cases changes."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Attempted to preserve the exact record and qualifier while falsifying the selected DNF branch; the atomic qualifier closes the only gap, so no counterexample remains: Responsive breakage supplies prior context-specific success and actual transformed-regime failure; one breakpoint qualifier selects the boundary-consequence branch.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Responsive-Layout Breakage", "one_liner": "Diagnose the silent UI failure where an interface's content survives a viewport, device, or locale transformation but its layout-encoded meaning — priority, adjacency, hierarchy, above-the-fold prominence — is lost, so a passing content-accessibility check actively conceals the defect.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:responsive_layout_breakage", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O7"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "responsive_breakpoint_consequence_changes", "predicate": "The viewport transformation changes the operational consequence of cases at a responsive breakpoint.", "rationale": "The context qualifier is one atomic candidate-role fact, does not restate the head, and is sufficient for all guardable gaps. Responsive breakage supplies prior context-specific success and actual transformed-regime failure; one breakpoint qualifier selects the boundary-consequence branch."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "responsive_layout_breakage"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "responsive_breakpoint_consequence_changes"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "responsive_layout_breakage", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P032-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "Responsive breakage supplies prior context-specific success and actual transformed-regime failure; one breakpoint qualifier selects the boundary-consequence branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_GUARDED_EQUIVALENT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Attempted to preserve the exact record and qualifier while falsifying the selected DNF branch; the atomic qualifier closes the only gap, so no counterexample remains: One scalar upward threshold crossing supplies the prior working regime, the process-speed change, and the timing of actual picture failure.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Situational-Awareness Collapse", "one_liner": "Locate a control failure under tempo in the picture-keeping pipeline rather than in missing data — a rate problem where perception, comprehension, or projection can no longer cycle fast enough to keep the decision-maker's model current.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:situational_awareness_collapse", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2", "O4", "O6"], "guard_type": "THRESHOLD_CROSSING", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "environment_rate_crosses_picture_bandwidth", "predicate": "The environment's process speed rises from within to above the picture-keeping pipeline's update bandwidth.", "rationale": "The context qualifier is one atomic candidate-role fact, does not restate the head, and is sufficient for all guardable gaps. One scalar upward threshold crossing supplies the prior working regime, the process-speed change, and the timing of actual picture failure."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "situational_awareness_collapse"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "environment_rate_crosses_picture_bandwidth"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "situational_awareness_collapse", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P032-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "One scalar upward threshold crossing supplies the prior working regime, the process-speed change, and the timing of actual picture failure."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A model that worked at one scale fails when cadence, process speed, or boundary-case consequence changes.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The same phenomenon can plausibly be described as individual events, named states, stages, categories, continuous levels, rates, or flows.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Continuous representations preserve gradation but can hide events, thresholds, accountability points, and discontinuities. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: The same phenomenon can plausibly be described as individual events, named states, stages, categories, continuous levels, rates, or flows. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The same phenomenon can plausibly be described as individual events, named states, stages, categories, continuous levels, rates, or flows.", "Continuous representations preserve gradation but can hide events, thresholds, accountability points, and discontinuities."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "The same phenomenon can plausibly be described as individual events, named states, stages, categories, continuous levels, rates, or flows."}, {"display_text": "Important decisions depend on timing, transition detection, thresholds, accumulation, escalation, measurement resolution, or control response.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A process is modeled with the wrong granularity, causing missed jumps, false smoothness, excessive complexity, poor control, or misleading decisions. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: Important decisions depend on timing, transition detection, thresholds, accumulation, escalation, measurement resolution, or control response. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Important decisions depend on timing, transition detection, thresholds, accumulation, escalation, measurement resolution, or control response.", "A process is modeled with the wrong granularity, causing missed jumps, false smoothness, excessive complexity, poor control, or misleading decisions."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "Important decisions depend on timing, transition detection, thresholds, accumulation, escalation, measurement resolution, or control response."}, {"display_text": "Different stakeholders use different granularities and therefore disagree about what has changed or what response is warranted.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Different stakeholders use different granularities and therefore disagree about what has changed or what response is warranted. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Different stakeholders use different granularities and therefore disagree about what has changed or what response is warranted."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Different stakeholders use different granularities and therefore disagree about what has changed or what response is warranted."}, {"display_text": "The system combines continuous variation with discrete interventions, approvals, failures, or state changes.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The result may be false smoothness, where important jumps disappear into averages; false discreteness, where continuous variation is chopped into arbitrary categories; or hybrid confusion, where people switch between step and flow reasoning without knowing when or why. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The system combines continuous variation with discrete interventions, approvals, failures, or state changes. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The system combines continuous variation with discrete interventions, approvals, failures, or state changes.", "The result may be false smoothness, where important jumps disappear into averages; false discreteness, where continuous variation is chopped into arbitrary categories; or hybrid confusion, where people switch between step and flow reasoning without knowing when or why."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The system combines continuous variation with discrete interventions, approvals, failures, or state changes."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 22, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-022", "ledger_sha256": "5ee4a2492fc5a9807f53a77363a79d1f55eb55ca3ec19db3ac3cab077686fe47"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": [{"groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Attempted to preserve the exact record and qualifier while falsifying the selected DNF branch; the atomic qualifier closes the only gap, so no counterexample remains: Discrete requirement changes are direct; one atomic property on the candidate-native volatility scalar supplies continuous variation.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Requirements Volatility", "one_liner": "Treat frequent, substantive change in a system's requirements as a measurable churn rate matched against the team's absorption capacity, then flatten Boehm's cost-of-change curve so late changes force only local rework rather than cascading redesign.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:requirements_volatility", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "requirements_volatility_rate_varies_continuously", "predicate": "The measured requirements-volatility rate varies continuously over development time.", "rationale": "The context qualifier is one atomic candidate-role fact, does not restate the head, and is sufficient for all guardable gaps. Discrete requirement changes are direct; one atomic property on the candidate-native volatility scalar supplies continuous variation."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "requirements_volatility"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "requirements_volatility_rate_varies_continuously"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "requirements_volatility", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P032-C10-U1", "why_it_fits": "Discrete requirement changes are direct; one atomic property on the candidate-native volatility scalar supplies continuous variation."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Attempted to preserve the exact record and qualifier while falsifying the selected DNF branch; the atomic qualifier closes the only gap, so no counterexample remains: Discrete specification changes are direct; one atomic property on the candidate-native amendment-rate scalar supplies continuous variation.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Requirements Churn", "one_liner": "A project pathology in which the specification changes faster than the execution organization can absorb it — a control-theoretic case where the reference signal outruns the controller's bandwidth, so no spec lives long enough for work to consolidate against it.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:requirements_churn", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "specification_amendment_rate_varies_continuously", "predicate": "The specification-amendment rate varies continuously over project time.", "rationale": "The context qualifier is one atomic candidate-role fact, does not restate the head, and is sufficient for all guardable gaps. Discrete specification changes are direct; one atomic property on the candidate-native amendment-rate scalar supplies continuous variation."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "requirements_churn"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "specification_amendment_rate_varies_continuously"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "requirements_churn", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P032-C10-U1", "why_it_fits": "Discrete specification changes are direct; one atomic property on the candidate-native amendment-rate scalar supplies continuous variation."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Attempted to preserve every exact-record role while falsifying the selected DNF branch, but the candidate identity necessarily supplies all selected obligations: Every regression-discontinuity design couples continuous variation to a discrete intervention assignment in the same system.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Regression Discontinuity Design", "one_liner": "Recover a causal effect from a threshold rule by comparing units just above and just below a sharp cutoff on a continuous running variable, where they are comparable in expectation, so any jump in the outcome at exactly the cutoff is attributable to the treatment rather than to selection.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:regression_discontinuity_design", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "regression_discontinuity_design"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "regression_discontinuity_design", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P032-C10-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every regression-discontinuity design couples continuous variation to a discrete intervention assignment in the same system."}], "publication_role": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT_ONLY", "source_residual_occurrence_id": "r:discrete_continuous_model_selection:b022_a09_c6", "unit": {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P032-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve coexistence within the same system, not a comparison between unrelated systems.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "One system contains both components.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a continuously varying process or quantity.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Continuous variation is one component.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve coexistence or coupling of continuous and discrete forms.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The continuous component is combined with the selected discrete component.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve a discrete intervention event.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The discrete component is an intervention.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve a discrete approval event or decision.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The discrete component is an approval.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve a discrete failure event.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The discrete component is a failure.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve a discrete transition between states.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The discrete component is a state change.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "The system combines continuous variation with discrete interventions, approvals, failures, or state changes.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "One system combines continuous variation with one listed discrete event or transition type.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P032-C10-U1"}}]}
{"archetype": {"name": "Disequilibrium Leverage and Dissipation Management", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:disequilibrium_leverage_and_dissipation_management", "slug": "disequilibrium_leverage_and_dissipation_management"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 2 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 2}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A target system needs movement, learning, adoption, reconfiguration, or energy transfer, but equilibrium-like conditions provide too little directional force; conversely, available disequilibrium contains leverage but also generates dissipation, externalized disorder, and nonlinear escalation risk.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A strong non-equilibrium gradient offers leverage for change but can dissipate into waste, externalized disorder, or uncontrolled nonlinear transition."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A phase transition can occur at a critical parameter without a currently strong gradient, crisis, resource asymmetry, or early instability.", "slug": "tipping_points_or_phase_transitions"}], "residual_id": "r:disequilibrium_leverage_and_dissipation_management:b022_a10_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b022_a10_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A strong gradient, imbalance, crisis, pressure differential, resource asymmetry, or early instability is already present. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A strong gradient, imbalance, crisis, pressure differential, resource asymmetry, or early instability is already present."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A phase transition can occur at a critical parameter without a currently strong gradient, crisis, resource asymmetry, or early instability.", "slug": "tipping_points_or_phase_transitions"}], "normalized_requirement": "A strong gradient, imbalance, crisis, pressure differential, resource asymmetry, or early instability is present.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A strong gradient, imbalance, crisis, pressure differential, resource asymmetry, or early instability is present.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "Using the present gradient would generate material dissipation, externalized disorder, or nonlinear escalation risk.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Using the present gradient would generate material dissipation, externalized disorder, or nonlinear escalation risk.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The desired change requires more force, attention, or flow than routine equilibrium operations can provide.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A target system needs movement, learning, adoption, reconfiguration, or energy transfer, but equilibrium-like conditions provide too little directional force; conversely, available disequilibrium contains leverage but also generates dissipation, externalized disorder, and nonlinear escalation risk. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: The desired change requires more force, attention, or flow than routine equilibrium operations can provide. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The desired change requires more force, attention, or flow than routine equilibrium operations can provide.", "A target system needs movement, learning, adoption, reconfiguration, or energy transfer, but equilibrium-like conditions provide too little directional force; conversely, available disequilibrium contains leverage but also generates dissipation, externalized disorder, and nonlinear escalation risk."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "The desired change requires more force, attention, or flow than routine equilibrium operations can provide."}, {"display_text": "The disequilibrium can be coupled to a target pathway without exposing the whole system to uncontrolled transition.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A target system needs movement, learning, adoption, reconfiguration, or energy transfer, but equilibrium-like conditions provide too little directional force; conversely, available disequilibrium contains leverage but also generates dissipation, externalized disorder, and nonlinear escalation risk. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: The disequilibrium can be coupled to a target pathway without exposing the whole system to uncontrolled transition. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The disequilibrium can be coupled to a target pathway without exposing the whole system to uncontrolled transition.", "A target system needs movement, learning, adoption, reconfiguration, or energy transfer, but equilibrium-like conditions provide too little directional force; conversely, available disequilibrium contains leverage but also generates dissipation, externalized disorder, and nonlinear escalation risk."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "The disequilibrium can be coupled to a target pathway without exposing the whole system to uncontrolled transition."}, {"display_text": "There is enough observability to see when useful leverage is decaying into waste or danger.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: There is enough observability to see when useful leverage is decaying into waste or danger. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["There is enough observability to see when useful leverage is decaying into waste or danger."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "There is enough observability to see when useful leverage is decaying into waste or danger."}, {"display_text": "The system has meaningful re-equilibration, exit, damping, or containment options.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: The system has meaningful re-equilibration, exit, damping, or containment options. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The system has meaningful re-equilibration, exit, damping, or containment options."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The system has meaningful re-equilibration, exit, damping, or containment options."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 22, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-022", "ledger_sha256": "5ee4a2492fc5a9807f53a77363a79d1f55eb55ca3ec19db3ac3cab077686fe47"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Displacement-Aware Capacity Admission", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:displacement_aware_capacity_admission", "slug": "displacement_aware_capacity_admission"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A new or expanded activity consumes a finite shared substrate and thereby reduces the capacity, visibility, funding, access, viability, or attention available to incumbent activities. Because the entrant often reports its own benefit while the displaced activity disappears into the baseline, total system performance can be overstated and vulnerable or less visible uses can be silently sacrificed.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A new or expanding activity consumes a finite substrate shared with an incumbent, mechanically reducing the incumbent's access while its loss is less visible and difficult to relocate."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a finite shared substrate that is the common dependency of an incumbent and an introduced or expanded activity.", "role_mapping": "Activities -> incumbent and entrant; bounded medium -> finite shared substrate.", "slug": "crowding_out", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b022_a11_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A new or expanded activity consumes a finite shared substrate and thereby reduces the capacity, visibility, funding, access, viability, or attention available to incumbent activities. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Two or more activities depend on the same bounded substrate, medium, time, budget, habitat, channel, capacity pool, or attention space.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Two or more activities depend on the same bounded substrate, medium, time, budget, habitat, channel, capacity pool, or attention space.", "A new or expanded activity consumes a finite shared substrate and thereby reduces the capacity, visibility, funding, access, viability, or attention available to incumbent activities."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Crowding Out", "one_liner": "Introducing or expanding one activity inside a finite shared substrate displaces an existing activity that depended on that same substrate.", "page_ref": "prime:crowding_out", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Activities -> incumbent and entrant; bounded medium -> finite shared substrate.", "slug": "crowding_out", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a finite shared substrate that is the common dependency of an incumbent and an introduced or expanded activity."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Two or more activities depend on the same bounded substrate, medium, time, budget, habitat, channel, capacity pool, or attention space.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a second activity to be introduced or expanded through the same substrate used by the incumbent.", "role_mapping": "New or expanded activity -> entrant; admission substrate -> shared channel.", "slug": "crowding_out", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b022_a11_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A new activity, policy, product, workload, population, program, or investment seeks admission or expansion inside that substrate. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A new activity, policy, product, workload, population, program, or investment seeks admission or expansion inside that substrate."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Crowding Out", "one_liner": "Introducing or expanding one activity inside a finite shared substrate displaces an existing activity that depended on that same substrate.", "page_ref": "prime:crowding_out", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "New or expanded activity -> entrant; admission substrate -> shared channel.", "slug": "crowding_out", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a second activity to be introduced or expanded through the same substrate used by the incumbent."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A new activity, policy, product, workload, population, program, or investment seeks admission or expansion in the substrate.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P032-C11", "dnf": [], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [], "predicate": "The substrate has limited slack.", "resolution": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RESIDUAL", "semantic_scope": "NON_ABSTRACTION", "structural_head": "A substrate has little unused capacity.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P032-C11-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P032-C11", "dnf": [], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [], "predicate": "The substrate expands slowly.", "resolution": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RESIDUAL", "semantic_scope": "NON_ABSTRACTION", "structural_head": "A substrate's capacity increases slowly.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P032-C11-U2"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P032-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a substrate or resource base exposed to load.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A shared substrate is the loaded object.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve usage or demand imposed on the substrate.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Load on the substrate is the causal condition.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve degradation in quality caused by load, not capacity consumption alone.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The load causes the substrate's quality to degrade.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "The substrate's quality degrades under load.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Load on a substrate degrades its quality.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P032-C11-U3"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P032-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve users whose access or reliance is informal rather than formally registered.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Informal users use or depend on the substrate.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve claims or interests associated with those users.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The informal users have claims on the substrate or its capacity.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve omission from the normal representation or decision process, not merely weak influence after representation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The informal users' claims are not automatically represented.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "The substrate contains informal users whose claims are not automatically represented.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Informal substrate users have claims that are not automatically represented.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P032-C11-U4"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A finite substrate can have ample present slack, and crowding out does not require slow expansion, degradation, or informal users.", "slug": "crowding_out"}], "residual_id": "r:displacement_aware_capacity_admission:b022_a11_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b022_a11_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The substrate has limited slack, slow expansion, quality degradation under load, or informal users whose claims are not automatically represented. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The substrate has limited slack, slow expansion, quality degradation under load, or informal users whose claims are not automatically represented."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 2, "non_abstraction_units": 2, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 2}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A finite substrate can have ample present slack, and crowding out does not require slow expansion, degradation, or informal users.", "slug": "crowding_out"}], "normalized_requirement": "The substrate has limited slack, expands slowly, degrades under load, or contains informal users whose claims are not represented.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 2 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The substrate has limited slack, expands slowly, degrades under load, or contains informal users whose claims are not represented.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P032-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an incumbent or activity displaced from its existing access.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A displaced activity is the entity seeking substitution.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the joint unavailability of ease and losslessness, while allowing a route to be easy but lossy or difficult but lossless.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "No listed substitution route is both easy and lossless.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the joint easy-and-lossless limitation for relocation to another substrate.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "An easy-and-lossless substitution to another substrate is unavailable.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the joint easy-and-lossless limitation for shifting the activity to another time.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "An easy-and-lossless substitution to another time is unavailable.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the joint easy-and-lossless limitation for moving the activity to another channel.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "An easy-and-lossless substitution to another channel is unavailable.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the joint easy-and-lossless limitation for substituting another resource.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "An easy-and-lossless substitution to another resource is unavailable.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "The displaced activity cannot easily substitute to another substrate, time, channel, or resource without loss.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A displaced activity lacks an easy, lossless substitute across the listed relocation dimensions.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P032-C13-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Crowding-out elasticity can be attenuated when the incumbent substitutes to another channel, so difficult low-loss relocation is not mandatory.", "slug": "crowding_out"}], "residual_id": "r:displacement_aware_capacity_admission:b022_a11_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b022_a11_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The displaced activity cannot easily substitute to another substrate, time, channel, or resource without loss. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The displaced activity cannot easily substitute to another substrate, time, channel, or resource without loss."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Crowding-out elasticity can be attenuated when the incumbent substitutes to another channel, so difficult low-loss relocation is not mandatory.", "slug": "crowding_out"}], "normalized_requirement": "The displaced activity cannot easily move to another substrate, time, channel, or resource without loss.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The displaced activity cannot easily move to another substrate, time, channel, or resource without loss.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The expected benefit of the entrant is measured more clearly than the incumbent loss it may create.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The same substrate cannot fully serve every activity, but the expansion decision often counts entrant benefits more explicitly than incumbent displacement, especially when incumbent use is diffuse, informal, low-status, delayed, ecological, or hard to meter. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The expected benefit of the entrant is measured more clearly than the incumbent loss it may create. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The expected benefit of the entrant is measured more clearly than the incumbent loss it may create.", "The same substrate cannot fully serve every activity, but the expansion decision often counts entrant benefits more explicitly than incumbent displacement, especially when incumbent use is diffuse, informal, low-status, delayed, ecological, or hard to meter."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The expected benefit of the entrant is measured more clearly than the incumbent loss it may create."}, {"display_text": "Decision makers have authority to phase, resize, offset, relocate, reserve, price, or reject the entrant before displacement becomes irreversible.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The same substrate cannot fully serve every activity, but the expansion decision often counts entrant benefits more explicitly than incumbent displacement, especially when incumbent use is diffuse, informal, low-status, delayed, ecological, or hard to meter. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: Decision makers have authority to phase, resize, offset, relocate, reserve, price, or reject the entrant before displacement becomes irreversible. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Decision makers have authority to phase, resize, offset, relocate, reserve, price, or reject the entrant before displacement becomes irreversible.", "The same substrate cannot fully serve every activity, but the expansion decision often counts entrant benefits more explicitly than incumbent displacement, especially when incumbent use is diffuse, informal, low-status, delayed, ecological, or hard to meter."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Decision makers have authority to phase, resize, offset, relocate, reserve, price, or reject the entrant before displacement becomes irreversible."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 22, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-022", "ledger_sha256": "5ee4a2492fc5a9807f53a77363a79d1f55eb55ca3ec19db3ac3cab077686fe47"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Dispute-Question Alignment", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:dispute_question_alignment", "slug": "dispute_question_alignment"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 4 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A disagreement has become under-specified: the parties appear to contest the same subject but are actually contesting different kinds of questions. Facts, definitions, classifications, values, remedies, jurisdictions, and procedural authority are blended together, so evidence that would answer one question is rejected as irrelevant by another party, and each side experiences the other as evasive or irrational. Without a stasis alignment step, later adjudication, debate, negotiation, research, or policy design can optimize the wrong issue.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Parties appear to contest one subject but loop because their arguments and evidence address different implicit question types, levels, or decision authorities."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mismatch signature is a non-converging exchange in which parties address different typed questions and therefore fail to update.", "role_mapping": "Looping dispute -> mismatch signature; implicit questions -> divergent stases.", "slug": "stasis", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b022_a12_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A dispute or deliberation loops because participants keep answering different implicit questions. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A dispute or deliberation loops because participants keep answering different implicit questions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Stasis", "one_liner": "Locate the kind of question at issue in a dispute—did it happen, what is it, was it justified, whose call is it—before contesting the substance, since disputants who seem to disagree about the answer are often disagreeing about the question.", "page_ref": "prime:stasis", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Looping dispute -> mismatch signature; implicit questions -> divergent stases.", "slug": "stasis", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mismatch signature is a non-converging exchange in which parties address different typed questions and therefore fail to update."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A dispute or deliberation loops because participants answer different implicit questions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P032-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve available evidence rather than a dispute caused by missing evidence.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The focal evidence is available.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve more than one party or party group.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Multiple parties are involved.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve disagreement over the evidential role or proposition supported.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "What the evidence is supposed to prove is the disputed target.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve actual disagreement over what the same evidence establishes.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The parties disagree about the evidence's proof target.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve divergent evidential interpretations rather than disagreement over whether the evidence exists.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The parties assign different proof targets to the same evidence.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Evidence is available but parties disagree about what that evidence is supposed to prove.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Parties disagree over the proof target of available evidence.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P032-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A stasis mismatch can arise before evidence is available and need not include disagreement about what evidence proves.", "slug": "stasis"}], "residual_id": "r:dispute_question_alignment:b022_a12_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b022_a12_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Evidence is available but parties disagree about what that evidence is supposed to prove. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Evidence is available but parties disagree about what that evidence is supposed to prove."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A stasis mismatch can arise before evidence is available and need not include disagreement about what evidence proves.", "slug": "stasis"}], "normalized_requirement": "Evidence is available but parties disagree about what it is supposed to prove.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Evidence is available but parties disagree about what it is supposed to prove.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P032-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O9"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve that the disputants address the same object rather than different objects.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "One focal object is held constant across the contestation.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve more than one descriptive level.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Multiple levels of description are applied.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve actual contestation or dispute, not neutral multi-level description.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The focal object is contested at those levels.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve cross-level identity of the contested object.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The different descriptive levels apply to the same focal object.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve a label as the focal object.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The contested object is a label.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve an event as the focal object.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The contested object is an event.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve a behavior as the focal object.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The contested object is a behavior.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve an artifact as the focal object.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The contested object is an artifact.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve a decision as the focal object.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "The contested object is a decision.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "The same label, event, behavior, artifact, or decision is being contested at multiple levels of description.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "One listed object is contested at multiple descriptive levels.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P032-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Stasis distinguishes question kinds, not necessarily levels of description applied to one object.", "slug": "stasis"}], "residual_id": "r:dispute_question_alignment:b022_a12_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b022_a12_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The same label, event, behavior, artifact, or decision is being contested at multiple levels of description. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The same label, event, behavior, artifact, or decision is being contested at multiple levels of description."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Stasis distinguishes question kinds, not necessarily levels of description applied to one object.", "slug": "stasis"}], "normalized_requirement": "The same label, event, behavior, artifact, or decision is contested at multiple levels of description.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The same label, event, behavior, artifact, or decision is contested at multiple levels of description.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P033-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve disagreement between plural parties rather than uncertainty within one actor.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "At least two parties hold incompatible positions on the selected issue.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require incompatible judgments about the same authority, proof, or remedy term.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The parties disagree over the selected authority, proof-standard, or remedy issue.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must make the disagreement an operative impediment rather than a harmless difference.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The disagreement blocks progress.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve blockage of substantive progress, not only delay in settling the selected authority, proof-standard, or remedy issue itself.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The blocked progress concerns the substance of the dispute.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires disagreement over who is entitled or authorized to decide.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The disputed term is who has decision authority.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires disagreement over the applicable proof or evidence standard.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The disputed term is what counts as proof.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires disagreement over the availability or admissibility of a remedy.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The disputed term is what remedy is available.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Disagreement over who may decide, what counts as proof, or what remedy is available blocks substantive progress.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Disagreement over one authority, proof-standard, or remedy issue blocks progress on the substantive dispute.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P033-C02-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A stasis mismatch can concern conjecture or definition while authority, proof standards, and remedies are shared.", "slug": "stasis"}], "residual_id": "r:dispute_question_alignment:b022_a12_c8", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b022_a12_c8", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Disagreement about who may decide, what counts as proof, or what remedy is available blocks substantive progress. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Disagreement about who may decide, what counts as proof, or what remedy is available blocks substantive progress."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A stasis mismatch can concern conjecture or definition while authority, proof standards, and remedies are shared.", "slug": "stasis"}], "normalized_requirement": "Disagreement over who may decide, what counts as proof, or what remedy is available blocks substantive progress.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Disagreement over who may decide, what counts as proof, or what remedy is available blocks substantive progress.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [8], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The central proposition can be decomposed into fact, definition, quality or justification, policy or action, and jurisdiction or procedure questions.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Facts, definitions, classifications, values, remedies, jurisdictions, and procedural authority are blended together, so evidence that would answer one question is rejected as irrelevant by another party, and each side experiences the other as evasive or irrational. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: The central proposition can be decomposed into fact, definition, quality or justification, policy or action, and jurisdiction or procedure questions. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The central proposition can be decomposed into fact, definition, quality or justification, policy or action, and jurisdiction or procedure questions.", "Facts, definitions, classifications, values, remedies, jurisdictions, and procedural authority are blended together, so evidence that would answer one question is rejected as irrelevant by another party, and each side experiences the other as evasive or irrational."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "The central proposition can be decomposed into fact, definition, quality or justification, policy or action, and jurisdiction or procedure questions."}, {"display_text": "A decision forum, burden of proof, or standard of relevance depends on how the issue is classified.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: A decision forum, burden of proof, or standard of relevance depends on how the issue is classified. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A decision forum, burden of proof, or standard of relevance depends on how the issue is classified."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "A decision forum, burden of proof, or standard of relevance depends on how the issue is classified."}, {"display_text": "There is a risk that a party will win by reframing the question rather than answering it.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A disagreement has become under-specified: the parties appear to contest the same subject but are actually contesting different kinds of questions. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: There is a risk that a party will win by reframing the question rather than answering it. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["There is a risk that a party will win by reframing the question rather than answering it.", "A disagreement has become under-specified: the parties appear to contest the same subject but are actually contesting different kinds of questions."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "There is a risk that a party will win by reframing the question rather than answering it."}, {"display_text": "A formal system, rule set, or institutional procedure needs the issue typed before a valid decision can be made.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: A formal system, rule set, or institutional procedure needs the issue typed before a valid decision can be made. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A formal system, rule set, or institutional procedure needs the issue typed before a valid decision can be made."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "A formal system, rule set, or institutional procedure needs the issue typed before a valid decision can be made."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 22, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-022", "ledger_sha256": "5ee4a2492fc5a9807f53a77363a79d1f55eb55ca3ec19db3ac3cab077686fe47"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": [{"groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Independent counterexample test: If the new material actually answered the original question, or did not displace it, the exact red-herring identity would fail.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Red Herring", "one_liner": "Deflect a discussion by introducing material irrelevant to the open question, so attention and the conversational floor shift to the new topic and the original question is left feeling-addressed-but-unanswered — the test being whether the new material does any work on the claim that was open.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:red_herring", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "red_herring"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "red_herring", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P033-C01-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent universal-necessity review confirms every complete exact-record instance satisfies one full DNF branch without a qualifier. Every complete red-herring instance shifts attention to an irrelevant topic, leaves the original question unanswered, and creates the impression of response; that supplies a possible rhetorical win caused by the substitution."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Independent counterexample test: Removing Q-prime-for-Q substitution leaves either a relevant argument or an acknowledged tangent, not irrelevant conclusion.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Irrelevant conclusion", "one_liner": "Prove a sound argument for a proposition that is not the one at issue, then treat it as settling the contested claim — a relevance failure caught by restating the question before grading the answer.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:irrelevant_conclusion", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "irrelevant_conclusion"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "irrelevant_conclusion", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P033-C01-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent universal-necessity review confirms every complete exact-record instance satisfies one full DNF branch without a qualifier. The exact record requires an arguer to establish Q-prime and treat it as settling contested Q, so all five obligations, including possible apparent success attributable to the substitution, are constitutive."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Independent counterexample test: Without the bridge the exact record speaks in claim, target, origin, standard, or eligibility vocabulary rather than the source's question vocabulary; with it, no complete instance can preserve the substitution while leaving O2 false.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_BRIDGE", "name": "Moving the goalposts", "one_liner": "An argumentative pattern in which, on being shown evidence that meets a previously stipulated standard, one party revises the standard upward to block the conclusion rather than accept it — repeated so that no finite evidence can settle the question.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:moving_the_goalposts", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2"], "guard_type": "RELATION_SUBSUMPTION", "kind": "INTERPRETIVE_BRIDGE", "normalized_key": "goalpost_shift_reframes_question", "predicate": "Replacing a satisfied proof standard with a new standard reframes the focal question the evidence must answer.", "rationale": "Safety audit passes: one relation bridge is anchored, general outside this edge, non-restating, and sufficient for the selected branch."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "moving_the_goalposts"}, {"kind": "INTERPRETIVE_BRIDGE", "value": "Replacing a satisfied proof standard with a new standard reframes the focal question the evidence must answer."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "moving_the_goalposts", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P033-C01-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent guard audit confirms the exact candidate supplies the spine and one atomic, anchored, non-restating qualifier closes every remaining gap. The candidate supplies the full substitution spine and possible apparent win; one general relation bridge types that target substitution as question reframing without adding a fact."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Independent counterexample test: Without the bridge the exact record speaks in claim, target, origin, standard, or eligibility vocabulary rather than the source's question vocabulary; with it, no complete instance can preserve the substitution while leaving O2 false.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_BRIDGE", "name": "Straw Man", "one_liner": "Refute a weakened proxy of an opponent's view instead of the view they actually hold, so an apparent victory leaves the real position untouched.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:straw_man", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2"], "guard_type": "RELATION_SUBSUMPTION", "kind": "INTERPRETIVE_BRIDGE", "normalized_key": "straw_target_substitution_reframes_question", "predicate": "Substituting a weakened proxy position for the disputed position reframes the focal question.", "rationale": "Safety audit passes: one relation bridge is anchored, general outside this edge, non-restating, and sufficient for the selected branch."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "straw_man"}, {"kind": "INTERPRETIVE_BRIDGE", "value": "Substituting a weakened proxy position for the disputed position reframes the focal question."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "straw_man", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P033-C01-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent guard audit confirms the exact candidate supplies the spine and one atomic, anchored, non-restating qualifier closes every remaining gap. The candidate supplies the full substitution spine and possible apparent win; one general relation bridge types that target substitution as question reframing without adding a fact."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Independent counterexample test: If the dispute genuinely concerned standing, the exact record classifies the move as non-fallacious, so a complete fallacious instance cannot omit the question substitution.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Tu Quoque", "one_liner": "Catch the fallacy of rebutting a charge by alleging the accuser commits the same offence — substituting a verdict on the speaker's standing for a verdict on the speaker's claim — by asking whether the dispute was about a proposition's truth or the speaker's standing.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:tu_quoque", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "tu_quoque"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "tu_quoque", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P033-C01-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent universal-necessity review confirms every complete exact-record instance satisfies one full DNF branch without a qualifier. Every complete tu-quoque instance substitutes the accuser's standing for the charge's truth and can turn the dispute into a mutual-blame standoff; the possible success is caused by that shift."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Independent counterexample test: Without the bridge the exact record speaks in claim, target, origin, standard, or eligibility vocabulary rather than the source's question vocabulary; with it, no complete instance can preserve the substitution while leaving O2 false.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_BRIDGE", "name": "Relative Privation", "one_liner": "The informal fallacy of dismissing a concern by pointing to a worse problem elsewhere, conflating severity-ranking with action-licensing — since ranking governs how much total attention a problem warrants, not whether it is eligible for any, unless the worse problem's resources are genuinely exclusive.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:relative_privation", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2"], "guard_type": "RELATION_SUBSUMPTION", "kind": "INTERPRETIVE_BRIDGE", "normalized_key": "severity_substitution_reframes_question", "predicate": "Substituting relative severity for action eligibility reframes the focal question.", "rationale": "Safety audit passes: one relation bridge is anchored, general outside this edge, non-restating, and sufficient for the selected branch."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "relative_privation"}, {"kind": "INTERPRETIVE_BRIDGE", "value": "Substituting relative severity for action eligibility reframes the focal question."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "relative_privation", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P033-C01-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent guard audit confirms the exact candidate supplies the spine and one atomic, anchored, non-restating qualifier closes every remaining gap. The candidate supplies the full substitution spine and possible apparent win; one general relation bridge types that target substitution as question reframing without adding a fact."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Independent counterexample test: Without the bridge the exact record speaks in claim, target, origin, standard, or eligibility vocabulary rather than the source's question vocabulary; with it, no complete instance can preserve the substitution while leaving O2 false.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_BRIDGE", "name": "Motte-and-bailey fallacy", "one_liner": "Maintain a strong controversial claim and a weak defensible one under the same label, advancing the strong claim when unchallenged but retreating to the weak one under fire and resuming the strong claim once the challenge passes — so the motte's successful defence is misread as vindicating the bailey.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:motte_and_bailey_fallacy", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2"], "guard_type": "RELATION_SUBSUMPTION", "kind": "INTERPRETIVE_BRIDGE", "normalized_key": "motte_substitution_reframes_question", "predicate": "Substituting a weaker claim under challenge reframes the focal question.", "rationale": "Safety audit passes: one relation bridge is anchored, general outside this edge, non-restating, and sufficient for the selected branch."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "motte_and_bailey_fallacy"}, {"kind": "INTERPRETIVE_BRIDGE", "value": "Substituting a weaker claim under challenge reframes the focal question."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "motte_and_bailey_fallacy", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P033-C01-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent guard audit confirms the exact candidate supplies the spine and one atomic, anchored, non-restating qualifier closes every remaining gap. The candidate supplies the full substitution spine and possible apparent win; one general relation bridge types that target substitution as question reframing without adding a fact."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Independent counterexample test: Without the bridge the exact record speaks in claim, target, origin, standard, or eligibility vocabulary rather than the source's question vocabulary; with it, no complete instance can preserve the substitution while leaving O2 false.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_BRIDGE", "name": "Bulverism", "one_liner": "Assume an opponent's conclusion is false, then explain the psychological or sociological cause of their 'error' — substituting a genetic account of the belief for the logical evaluation that was owed.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:bulverism", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2"], "guard_type": "RELATION_SUBSUMPTION", "kind": "INTERPRETIVE_BRIDGE", "normalized_key": "origin_substitution_reframes_question", "predicate": "Substituting a belief-origin explanation for truth evaluation reframes the focal question from truth to origin.", "rationale": "Safety audit passes: one relation bridge is anchored, general outside this edge, non-restating, and sufficient for the selected branch."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "bulverism"}, {"kind": "INTERPRETIVE_BRIDGE", "value": "Substituting a belief-origin explanation for truth evaluation reframes the focal question from truth to origin."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "bulverism", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P033-C01-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent guard audit confirms the exact candidate supplies the spine and one atomic, anchored, non-restating qualifier closes every remaining gap. The candidate supplies the full substitution spine and possible apparent win; one general relation bridge types that target substitution as question reframing without adding a fact."}], "publication_role": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT_ONLY", "source_residual_occurrence_id": "r:dispute_question_alignment:b022_a12_c6", "unit": {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P033-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a disputing party as the actor, not an unaffiliated observer or moderator.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The actor is a party to the dispute.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require changing the question being contested rather than merely adding evidence to the original question.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The party reframes the focal question.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the rather-than relation: the reframing move replaces an answer instead of constituting one.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Reframing substitutes for answering the original question.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail a possible win from reframing without strengthening the source to inevitable victory.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Winning through the substitution is possible rather than guaranteed.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must connect the possible win to reframing, not merely place both in the same dispute.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The possible win is attributable to the reframing move.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "A party may win by reframing the question rather than answering it.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A disputing party may win by substituting a reframed question for an answer to the original.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P033-C01-U1"}}]}
{"archetype": {"name": "Disruptive Trajectory Positioning", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:disruptive_trajectory_positioning", "slug": "disruptive_trajectory_positioning"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 5, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A new product, service, process, platform, policy channel, or organizational model may be dismissed because it is initially worse on the incumbent value curve. Yet it serves ignored or overserved users under different constraints and may improve along a steeper or cheaper trajectory. If the entrant is judged only by incumbent metrics, it will be killed too early; if it is celebrated without trajectory evidence, it will be scaled before it is useful, safe, or sustainable. Incumbents may also miss the threat because the foothold segment appears unattractive under their current model.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "An initially inferior but cheaper or more accessible entrant serves an overserved or excluded foothold, improves on a steeper trajectory, and is discounted by an incumbent locked into legacy customers and metrics."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires incumbent overshoot that opens a low-end segment or a non-consuming market excluded from the incumbent offer.", "role_mapping": "Overserved/excluded users -> low-end or nonconsumer foothold.", "slug": "disruptive_innovation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b022_a13_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Users are overserved, priced out, excluded, or forced to adopt a complex incumbent solution that exceeds their needs. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Users are overserved, priced out, excluded, or forced to adopt a complex incumbent solution that exceeds their needs."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Disruptive Innovation", "one_liner": "An initially inferior entrant on a cheaper, steeper trajectory crosses the incumbent's value curve and displaces it, because the terms of competition shift rather than the entrant winning on the old ones.", "page_ref": "prime:disruptive_innovation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Overserved/excluded users -> low-end or nonconsumer foothold.", "slug": "disruptive_innovation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires incumbent overshoot that opens a low-end segment or a non-consuming market excluded from the incumbent offer."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Users are overserved, priced out, excluded, or forced into an incumbent solution exceeding their needs.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The inversion test requires an initially inferior entrant on the headline metric that is good enough for an overserved low end or nonconsumer beachhead.", "role_mapping": "Entrant -> initially inferior offer; foothold -> low-end/nonconsumer segment.", "slug": "disruptive_innovation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b022_a13_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: An entrant can deliver a simpler, cheaper, more convenient, or more accessible offer that is initially inferior on legacy performance metrics but acceptable for a foothold segment. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["An entrant can deliver a simpler, cheaper, more convenient, or more accessible offer that is initially inferior on legacy performance metrics but acceptable for a foothold segment."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Disruptive Innovation", "one_liner": "An initially inferior entrant on a cheaper, steeper trajectory crosses the incumbent's value curve and displaces it, because the terms of competition shift rather than the entrant winning on the old ones.", "page_ref": "prime:disruptive_innovation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Entrant -> initially inferior offer; foothold -> low-end/nonconsumer segment.", "slug": "disruptive_innovation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The inversion test requires an initially inferior entrant on the headline metric that is good enough for an overserved low end or nonconsumer beachhead."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "An entrant offers a simpler, cheaper, more convenient, or accessible product that is initially inferior on legacy metrics but acceptable to a foothold.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a cheaper steeper entrant trajectory that eventually crosses the incumbent value curve while value-network lock-in delays incumbent response.", "role_mapping": "Improvement trajectory -> steeper curve; incumbent adaptation -> value-network lock-in.", "slug": "disruptive_innovation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b022_a13_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The entrant needs shelter from incumbent comparison to learn on new terms, but too much shelter creates fantasy strategy; the incumbent needs to maintain current value, but too much commitment to current value blinds it to the trajectory that may redefine value. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The entrant has a credible learning, cost, reliability, distribution, data, network, or modularity trajectory that can improve faster than incumbent adaptation.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The entrant has a credible learning, cost, reliability, distribution, data, network, or modularity trajectory that can improve faster than incumbent adaptation.", "The entrant needs shelter from incumbent comparison to learn on new terms, but too much shelter creates fantasy strategy; the incumbent needs to maintain current value, but too much commitment to current value blinds it to the trajectory that may redefine value."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Disruptive Innovation", "one_liner": "An initially inferior entrant on a cheaper, steeper trajectory crosses the incumbent's value curve and displaces it, because the terms of competition shift rather than the entrant winning on the old ones.", "page_ref": "prime:disruptive_innovation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Improvement trajectory -> steeper curve; incumbent adaptation -> value-network lock-in.", "slug": "disruptive_innovation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a cheaper steeper entrant trajectory that eventually crosses the incumbent value curve while value-network lock-in delays incumbent response."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The entrant has a credible learning, cost, reliability, distribution, data, network, or modularity trajectory that can improve faster than incumbent adaptation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires incumbent cost structure, channels, resource allocation, and best-customer incentives to make defense of the foothold locally irrational.", "role_mapping": "Incumbent constraints -> value-network lock-in; entrant unattractive -> low-end margin logic.", "slug": "disruptive_innovation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b022_a13_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The incumbent has incentives, margins, processes, channel commitments, brand expectations, or customer demands that make the entrant look unattractive or strategically confusing. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The incumbent has incentives, margins, processes, channel commitments, brand expectations, or customer demands that make the entrant look unattractive or strategically confusing."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Disruptive Innovation", "one_liner": "An initially inferior entrant on a cheaper, steeper trajectory crosses the incumbent's value curve and displaces it, because the terms of competition shift rather than the entrant winning on the old ones.", "page_ref": "prime:disruptive_innovation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Incumbent constraints -> value-network lock-in; entrant unattractive -> low-end margin logic.", "slug": "disruptive_innovation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires incumbent cost structure, channels, resource allocation, and best-customer incentives to make defense of the foothold locally irrational."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Incumbent incentives, margins, processes, channels, brand, or customers make the entrant unattractive or strategically confusing.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires displacement because the terms of competition shift as the entrant crosses the value curve, not because it wins on the old metric.", "role_mapping": "Listed values -> new competition basis; legacy depth -> incumbent metric.", "slug": "disruptive_innovation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b022_a13_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The basis of competition is shifting: users begin to value access, convenience, affordability, simplicity, integration, or speed more than legacy feature depth. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The basis of competition is shifting: users begin to value access, convenience, affordability, simplicity, integration, or speed more than legacy feature depth."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Disruptive Innovation", "one_liner": "An initially inferior entrant on a cheaper, steeper trajectory crosses the incumbent's value curve and displaces it, because the terms of competition shift rather than the entrant winning on the old ones.", "page_ref": "prime:disruptive_innovation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Listed values -> new competition basis; legacy depth -> incumbent metric.", "slug": "disruptive_innovation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires displacement because the terms of competition shift as the entrant crosses the value curve, not because it wins on the old metric."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The basis of competition shifts toward access, convenience, affordability, simplicity, integration, or speed rather than legacy depth.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The transition could create harm, stranded dependencies, inequity, monopoly risk, security risk, or unmanaged obsolescence if displacement happens without guardrails.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The transition could create harm, stranded dependencies, inequity, monopoly risk, security risk, or unmanaged obsolescence if displacement happens without guardrails. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The transition could create harm, stranded dependencies, inequity, monopoly risk, security risk, or unmanaged obsolescence if displacement happens without guardrails."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The transition could create harm, stranded dependencies, inequity, monopoly risk, security risk, or unmanaged obsolescence if displacement happens without guardrails."}, {"display_text": "A decision-maker can still protect, test, fund, separate, acquire, partner with, regulate, or responsibly scale the entrant before the crossing point is obvious.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: A decision-maker can still protect, test, fund, separate, acquire, partner with, regulate, or responsibly scale the entrant before the crossing point is obvious. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A decision-maker can still protect, test, fund, separate, acquire, partner with, regulate, or responsibly scale the entrant before the crossing point is obvious."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "A decision-maker can still protect, test, fund, separate, acquire, partner with, regulate, or responsibly scale the entrant before the crossing point is obvious."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 22, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-022", "ledger_sha256": "5ee4a2492fc5a9807f53a77363a79d1f55eb55ca3ec19db3ac3cab077686fe47"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": [{"groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Independent counterexample test: No complete risk_transfer_without_reduction instance preserving the exact signature can falsify the selected DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Risk Transfer Without Reduction", "one_liner": "The maladaptation pattern in which an adaptation or defence lowers risk at a protected site by displacing the unchanged hazard onto a voiceless neighbour, catchment, or future generation — because it acts on one node's exposure rather than the generative pressure.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:risk_transfer_without_reduction", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "risk_transfer_without_reduction"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "risk_transfer_without_reduction", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P033-C03-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent universal-necessity review confirms every complete exact-record instance satisfies one full DNF branch without a qualifier. Every instance displaces an undiminished hazard through an involuntary, unrepresented transition and creates adverse equity or broader risk."}], "publication_role": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT_ONLY", "source_residual_occurrence_id": "r:disruptive_trajectory_positioning:b022_a13_c6", "unit": {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P033-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve displacement as the transition mechanism rather than an additive change with no displaced dependency or incumbent.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The transition proceeds through displacement.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the absence of safeguards governing the displacement, not merely the existence of a transition.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The displacement scenario lacks guardrails.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail risk or possibility of harm without strengthening the source to realized or inevitable harm.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "An adverse consequence is possible rather than certain.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must connect the adverse consequence risk to displacement occurring without guardrails.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Unguarded displacement can create the adverse consequence.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an adverse transition consequence, not a neutral change or ordinary replacement cost.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The possible consequence is harmful in the dependency, equity, market-power, security, obsolescence, or broader transition sense.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Unguarded displacement could create harm, stranded dependencies, inequity, monopoly risk, security risk, or unmanaged obsolescence.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A transition's unguarded displacement can produce adverse dependency, equity, power, security, obsolescence, or other harm.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P033-C03-U1"}}]}
{"archetype": {"name": "Dissent Protection Protocol", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:dissent_protection_protocol", "slug": "dissent_protection_protocol"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 2, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is not merely that people disagree. It is that disagreement exists but cannot safely or effectively reach the decision. A group may show surface unanimity while members with contrary evidence, local knowledge, stakeholder concerns, or plausible failure scenarios remain quiet.\n\nThis often happens because the cost of dissent is personal and immediate, while the cost of false consensus is collective and delayed. A participant who challenges the dominant view may risk status, belonging, future opportunities, or being seen as negative. The group, meanwhile, may not discover the cost of suppressed dissent until a preventable failure occurs.\n\nThe pattern is visible when concerns appear after the meeting, when junior members ask questions apologetically, when minority views are treated as disloyalty, when the same leaders speak first and longest, or when predictable failures later reveal that someone saw the problem but did not speak up in the decision forum.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A group forms premature apparent consensus while members suppress reservations or contrary risk information because cohesion, status dependence, and the lack of an effective dissent route make disagreement costly."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires premature consensus in which a leader or early position is treated as settled before private evidence is aggregated.", "role_mapping": "Dominant early view -> leader or early-consensus position.", "slug": "groupthink", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b022_a14_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A participant who challenges the dominant view may risk status, belonging, future opportunities, or being seen as negative. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A dominant view appears early.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A dominant view appears early.", "A participant who challenges the dominant view may risk status, belonging, future opportunities, or being seen as negative."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Groupthink", "one_liner": "Conformity overrides realism.", "page_ref": "prime:groupthink", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Dominant early view -> leader or early-consensus position.", "slug": "groupthink", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires premature consensus in which a leader or early position is treated as settled before private evidence is aggregated."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A dominant view appears early.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P033-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve members in the plural rather than one isolated person's private preference.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The dependence concerns multiple group members.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must make the collective the source or gatekeeper of the stake, not merely a setting where it is discussed.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The members depend on their group for the selected stake.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires group dependence for social or positional status.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The dependence is for status.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires group dependence for membership, acceptance, or belonging.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The dependence is for belonging.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires the group to control resources on which members depend.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The dependence is for resources.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires the group to supply or control evaluation of members.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The dependence is for evaluation.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Members depend on the group for status, belonging, resources, or evaluation.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Group members depend on the collective for one listed stake.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P033-C04-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Cohesion can arise from mutual attachment without material, evaluative, or status dependence on the group.", "slug": "groupthink"}], "residual_id": "r:dissent_protection_protocol:b022_a14_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b022_a14_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A group moves toward apparent agreement while members with reservations, contrary evidence, risk concerns, or alternative interpretations remain silent or soften their views because disagreement threatens harmony, belonging, status, speed, or career safety. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Members depend on the group for status, belonging, resources, or evaluation.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Members depend on the group for status, belonging, resources, or evaluation.", "A group moves toward apparent agreement while members with reservations, contrary evidence, risk concerns, or alternative interpretations remain silent or soften their views because disagreement threatens harmony, belonging, status, speed, or career safety."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Independent counterexample test: No complete crab_mentality instance preserving the exact signature can falsify the selected DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Crab Mentality", "one_liner": "Diagnose in-group sabotage of a member who rises above the shared baseline by the cost-without-gain signature — a voluntarily costly leveling act yielding no individual gain — which reveals asymmetric relative-position concern under identity threat rather than competition.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:crab_mentality", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "crab_mentality"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "crab_mentality", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P033-C04-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent universal-necessity review confirms every complete exact-record instance satisfies one full DNF branch without a qualifier. Every instance requires multiple members whose status is group-relative; the status branch completes the DNF."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Members depend on the group for status, belonging, resources, or evaluation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires cohesion-driven conformity and pressure toward uniformity, including social punishment of dissent as disloyal.", "role_mapping": "Harmony/loyalty value -> cohesion-driven consensus pressure.", "slug": "groupthink", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b022_a14_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A group moves toward apparent agreement while members with reservations, contrary evidence, risk concerns, or alternative interpretations remain silent or soften their views because disagreement threatens harmony, belonging, status, speed, or career safety. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The group values harmony, speed, loyalty, or unity.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The group values harmony, speed, loyalty, or unity.", "A group moves toward apparent agreement while members with reservations, contrary evidence, risk concerns, or alternative interpretations remain silent or soften their views because disagreement threatens harmony, belonging, status, speed, or career safety."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Groupthink", "one_liner": "Conformity overrides realism.", "page_ref": "prime:groupthink", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Harmony/loyalty value -> cohesion-driven consensus pressure.", "slug": "groupthink", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires cohesion-driven conformity and pressure toward uniformity, including social punishment of dissent as disloyal."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The group values harmony, speed, loyalty, or unity.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P033-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve information bearing on risk rather than generic knowledge or fungible resources.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The distributed object is risk-relevant information.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require plural holders so that a distribution can differ across them.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The information is distributed across multiple group members or positions.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a holder-to-information distribution relation, not merely disagreement about shared facts.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Different members hold portions of the risk information.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must make risk information unevenly allocated, not equally available to all members.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The distribution of risk information is unequal across holders.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Risk information is distributed unevenly.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Risk-relevant information is held unequally across group members.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P033-C05-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Groupthink can suppress equally shared disconfirming evidence through collective rationalization; uneven risk-information distribution is not mandatory.", "slug": "groupthink"}], "residual_id": "r:dissent_protection_protocol:b022_a14_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b022_a14_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Risk information is distributed unevenly. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Risk information is distributed unevenly."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Independent counterexample test: No complete common_operating_picture_breakdown instance preserving the exact signature can falsify the selected DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Common-Operating-Picture Breakdown", "one_liner": "The failure mode where a multi-party response acts incoherently because its engineered shared picture fails to synthesise participants' partial views — relocating the fault from the responders to the artefact, whose currency, completeness, and consistency become the lever.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:common_operating_picture_breakdown", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "common_operating_picture_breakdown"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "common_operating_picture_breakdown", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P033-C05-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent universal-necessity review confirms every complete exact-record instance satisfies one full DNF branch without a qualifier. Every breakdown has plural responders holding materially different partial incident information because synthesis failed."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Risk information is distributed unevenly.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P033-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve dissenting input rather than generic information or routine approval.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The prospective input is dissent or contrary judgment.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a decision as the object to be influenced, not merely interpersonal discussion.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The target is the group's decision.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the intended dissent-to-decision influence relation rather than an unrelated reporting channel.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The missing route would allow dissent to affect the decision.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require absence of a defined influence path, not an existing path that is merely difficult or punished.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "No such route is defined.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "There is no defined route for dissent to affect the decision.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "No defined influence path carries dissent into the group decision.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P033-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A formal dissent route may exist while members are punished or mindguards prevent its effective use; absence of a defined route is not mandatory.", "slug": "groupthink"}], "residual_id": "r:dissent_protection_protocol:b022_a14_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b022_a14_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Strategy approvals, product launches, policy decisions, incident findings, safety reviews, investment decisions, hiring recommendations, and governance votes all benefit from a protected route for dissent before commitment. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: There is no defined route for dissent to affect the decision.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["There is no defined route for dissent to affect the decision.", "Strategy approvals, product launches, policy decisions, incident findings, safety reviews, investment decisions, hiring recommendations, and governance votes all benefit from a protected route for dissent before commitment."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A formal dissent route may exist while members are punished or mindguards prevent its effective use; absence of a defined route is not mandatory.", "slug": "groupthink"}], "normalized_requirement": "There is no defined route for dissent to affect the decision.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "There is no defined route for dissent to affect the decision.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "Members with reservations or contrary evidence actually remain silent or soften their views because expressing dissent threatens harmony, belonging, status, speed, or career safety.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Members with reservations or contrary evidence actually remain silent or soften their views because expressing dissent threatens harmony, belonging, status, speed, or career safety.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A group decision is high-stakes or difficult to reverse.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is also useful when the decision is costly to reverse. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: A group decision is high-stakes or difficult to reverse. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A group decision is high-stakes or difficult to reverse.", "It is also useful when the decision is costly to reverse."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "A group decision is high-stakes or difficult to reverse."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 22, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-022", "ledger_sha256": "5ee4a2492fc5a9807f53a77363a79d1f55eb55ca3ec19db3ac3cab077686fe47"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Dissonance Resolution Pathway", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:dissonance_resolution_pathway", "slug": "dissonance_resolution_pathway"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 3, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a blocked update. A belief, action, policy, claim, or self-understanding has come into conflict with evidence or consequences, but acknowledging the conflict threatens something important: identity, authority, belonging, status, legitimacy, moral standing, or prior investment.\n\nThat threat makes avoidance attractive. People may reduce discomfort by denying the evidence, reinterpreting the conflict away, treating it as an exception, blaming someone else, or saying the right words while changing nothing. The system then keeps the appearance of consistency while the underlying mismatch remains active.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A self-relevant contradiction between prior commitment and new evidence or behavior creates aversive cognitive pressure that is reduced through defensive avoidance rather than an honest update."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P033-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O9"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O10"], ["O1", "O2", "O4", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O4", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O4", "O9"], ["O1", "O2", "O4", "O10"], ["O1", "O2", "O5", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O5", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O5", "O9"], ["O1", "O2", "O5", "O10"], ["O1", "O2", "O6", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O6", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O6", "O9"], ["O1", "O2", "O6", "O10"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an earlier belief, plan, promise, or self-image and a later result, incident, response, or fact.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The contradicted cognition or commitment predates the contradictory input.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve directed incompatibility from the later input to the earlier cognition or commitment.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The later input contradicts the earlier item.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This input branch requires a result or outcome as the contradictory development.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The later input is a result.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This input branch requires an incident as the contradictory development.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The later input is an incident.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This input branch requires a stakeholder response as the contradictory development.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The later input is a stakeholder response.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This input branch requires a newly available fact as the contradictory development.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The later input is a new fact.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This prior-item branch requires a previously held belief as the contradicted object.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The earlier item is a belief.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This prior-item branch requires a prior plan as the contradicted object.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The earlier item is a plan.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This prior-item branch requires a prior promise as the contradicted object.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "The earlier item is a promise.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This prior-item branch requires a prior self-image as the contradicted object.", "obligation_id": "O10", "statement": "The earlier item is a self-image.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}], "predicate": "A result, incident, stakeholder response, or new fact contradicts a prior belief, plan, promise, or self-image.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A later external development contradicts an earlier self-relevant cognition or commitment.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P033-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Dissonance can arise between a value and the actor's own behavior without any new result, incident, stakeholder response, or fact.", "slug": "cognitive_dissonance"}], "residual_id": "r:dissonance_resolution_pathway:b022_a15_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b022_a15_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A belief, action, policy, claim, or self-understanding has come into conflict with evidence or consequences, but acknowledging the conflict threatens something important: identity, authority, belonging, status, legitimacy, moral standing, or prior investment. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A result, incident, stakeholder response, or new fact contradicts a prior belief, plan, promise, or self-image.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A result, incident, stakeholder response, or new fact contradicts a prior belief, plan, promise, or self-image.", "A belief, action, policy, claim, or self-understanding has come into conflict with evidence or consequences, but acknowledging the conflict threatens something important: identity, authority, belonging, status, legitimacy, moral standing, or prior investment."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Independent counterexample test: After conjoining The disconfirming evidence is a new fact. no complete backfire_effect instance can preserve candidate and qualifier while falsifying the branch.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Backfire Effect", "one_liner": "The phenomenon in which evidence contradicting an identity-bound belief produces not revision but firmer commitment, because the challenge is processed as an attack on self and parried by counter-arguing that rehearses and strengthens the original position.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:backfire_effect", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O6"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "disconfirming_evidence_is_new_fact", "predicate": "The disconfirming evidence is a new fact.", "rationale": "Safety audit passes: one context guard binds an existing role, does not restate the head, and leaves no complete guarded counterexample."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "backfire_effect"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "disconfirming_evidence_is_new_fact"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "backfire_effect", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P033-C07-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent guard audit confirms the exact candidate supplies the spine and one atomic, anchored, non-restating qualifier closes every remaining gap. The DSA supplies the prior-belief contradiction spine; one branch selector restricts evidence to a new fact."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A result, incident, stakeholder response, or new fact contradicts a prior belief, plan, promise, or self-image.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a motivational aversive state created by recognized inconsistency and activation of a dissonance-reduction pathway.", "role_mapping": "Discomfort -> aversive state; move to reduce -> reduction motivation.", "slug": "cognitive_dissonance", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b022_a15_c2a", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: People experience discomfort and move toward denial, rationalization, selective attention, blame shifting, or symbolic compliance. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["People experience discomfort and move toward denial, rationalization, selective attention, blame shifting, or symbolic compliance."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Cognitive Dissonance", "one_liner": "Conflicting beliefs.", "page_ref": "prime:cognitive_dissonance", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Discomfort -> aversive state; move to reduce -> reduction motivation.", "slug": "cognitive_dissonance", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a motivational aversive state created by recognized inconsistency and activation of a dissonance-reduction pathway."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "People experience aversive discomfort from the inconsistency and move to reduce it.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P033-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a person or people as the discomfort-bearing actors, not an impersonal system state.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "People are the actors undergoing the response pathway.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require aversive discomfort rather than a neutral choice among response strategies.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The actors experience discomfort.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve directed adoption of the defensive response as the reduction pathway, not its mere availability.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The actors move toward the selected strategy as a discomfort-reduction path.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires denial as the defensive reduction path.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The selected strategy is denial.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires rationalization as the defensive reduction path.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The selected strategy is rationalization.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires selective attention as the defensive reduction path.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The selected strategy is selective attention.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires blame shifting as the defensive reduction path.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The selected strategy is blame shifting.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires symbolic compliance as the defensive reduction path.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The selected strategy is symbolic compliance.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "The discomfort-reduction path is denial, rationalization, selective attention, blame shifting, or symbolic compliance.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "People respond to discomfort by moving toward one listed defensive reduction strategy.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P033-C08-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime also permits constructive belief change, behavior change, or adding valid consonant cognitions; the listed defensive strategies are not mandatory.", "slug": "cognitive_dissonance"}], "residual_id": "r:dissonance_resolution_pathway:b022_a15_c2b", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b022_a15_c2b", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: People experience discomfort and move toward denial, rationalization, selective attention, blame shifting, or symbolic compliance. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["People experience discomfort and move toward denial, rationalization, selective attention, blame shifting, or symbolic compliance."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Independent counterexample test: A favorable memory caused only by new evidence, with no dissonance-reduction rewrite, is expressly outside choice-supportive bias.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Choice-Supportive Bias", "one_liner": "Explain why we misremember past decisions in our own favor: dissonance reduction rewrites the stored memory so the chosen option looks better and the rejected ones worse than the evidence actually showed at the time of choice.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:choice_supportive_bias", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "choice_supportive_bias"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "choice_supportive_bias", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P033-C08-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent universal-necessity review confirms every complete exact-record instance satisfies one full DNF branch without a qualifier. The exact mechanism explicitly makes dissonance pressure drive a self-favoring memory rewrite; that rewrite is rationalization used as discomfort reduction."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Independent counterexample test: A withdrawal response preserves identity threat but not rationalization and therefore fails the guard; every guarded instance has the full selected branch.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Identity Threat", "one_liner": "The anticipated devaluation of a positively-valued self-aspect when a situational cue makes it salient — activating a defensive response that competes with the very task or belief-revision the situation demands, and wins often enough to leave measurable costs.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:identity_threat", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O5"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "identity_threat_response_is_rationalization", "predicate": "The activated defensive response is motivated rationalization of the threatening cue.", "rationale": "Safety audit passes: one context guard binds an existing role, does not restate the head, and leaves no complete guarded counterexample."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "identity_threat"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The activated defensive response is motivated rationalization of the threatening cue."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "identity_threat", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P033-C08-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent guard audit confirms the exact candidate supplies the spine and one atomic, anchored, non-restating qualifier closes every remaining gap. Identity threat supplies the response spine and expressly names motivated reasoning among its defensive repertoire. One atomic response-subtype guard selects the rationalization branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Independent counterexample test: An ordinary proposition updated toward evidence has neither the identity discomfort nor defensive rationalization and is expressly outside the exact candidate.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Backfire Effect", "one_liner": "The phenomenon in which evidence contradicting an identity-bound belief produces not revision but firmer commitment, because the challenge is processed as an attack on self and parried by counter-arguing that rehearses and strengthens the original position.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:backfire_effect", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "backfire_effect"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "backfire_effect", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P033-C08-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent universal-necessity review confirms every complete exact-record instance satisfies one full DNF branch without a qualifier. Every complete backfire instance processes a challenge as an attack on self and mounts motivated counter-argument; this is a rationalization path for reducing identity discomfort."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The reduction path is denial, rationalization, selective attention, blame shifting, or symbolic compliance.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P033-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O9"], ["O1", "O2", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O4", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O4", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O4", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O4", "O9"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an attachment between the item and the stake, not their mere coexistence.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The prior item is tied to the selected self-relevant stake.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the item's prior or established status rather than a newly formed cognition or act.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The tied belief or action is already established or old.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This prior-item branch requires an established belief as the tied item.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The prior item is a belief.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This prior-item branch requires an established action or course of conduct as the tied item.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The prior item is an action.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This stake branch requires the belief or action to be tied to expertise.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The selected stake is expertise.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This stake branch requires the belief or action to be tied to role identity.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The selected stake is role identity.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This stake branch requires the belief or action to be tied to a public commitment.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The selected stake is public commitment.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This stake branch requires the belief or action to be tied to moral standing.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The selected stake is moral standing.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This stake branch requires the belief or action to be tied to organizational legitimacy.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "The selected stake is organizational legitimacy.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "The old belief or action is tied to expertise, role identity, public commitment, moral standing, or organizational legitimacy.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An earlier belief or action is bound to one listed identity, commitment, standing, or legitimacy stake.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P033-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Self-relevance can arise from a private costly choice or committed action without expertise, role identity, moral standing, or organizational legitimacy.", "slug": "cognitive_dissonance"}], "residual_id": "r:dissonance_resolution_pathway:b022_a15_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b022_a15_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A belief, action, policy, claim, or self-understanding has come into conflict with evidence or consequences, but acknowledging the conflict threatens something important: identity, authority, belonging, status, legitimacy, moral standing, or prior investment. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The old belief or action is tied to expertise, role identity, public commitment, moral standing, or organizational legitimacy.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The old belief or action is tied to expertise, role identity, public commitment, moral standing, or organizational legitimacy.", "A belief, action, policy, claim, or self-understanding has come into conflict with evidence or consequences, but acknowledging the conflict threatens something important: identity, authority, belonging, status, legitimacy, moral standing, or prior investment."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Independent counterexample test: After conjoining The identity-bound belief is tied specifically to role identity. no complete backfire_effect instance can preserve candidate and qualifier while falsifying the branch.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Backfire Effect", "one_liner": "The phenomenon in which evidence contradicting an identity-bound belief produces not revision but firmer commitment, because the challenge is processed as an attack on self and parried by counter-arguing that rehearses and strengthens the original position.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:backfire_effect", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O6"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "identity_bound_belief_tied_to_role_identity", "predicate": "The identity-bound belief is tied specifically to role identity.", "rationale": "Safety audit passes: one context guard binds an existing role, does not restate the head, and leaves no complete guarded counterexample."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "backfire_effect"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "identity_bound_belief_tied_to_role_identity"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "backfire_effect", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P033-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent guard audit confirms the exact candidate supplies the spine and one atomic, anchored, non-restating qualifier closes every remaining gap. The DSA supplies an established identity-bound belief; one selector restricts the stake to role identity."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Independent counterexample test: A threat to non-propositional group membership preserves the DSA but fails the guard; every guarded component is both an earlier belief and role-identity stake.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Identity Threat", "one_liner": "The anticipated devaluation of a positively-valued self-aspect when a situational cue makes it salient — activating a defensive response that competes with the very task or belief-revision the situation demands, and wins often enough to leave measurable costs.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:identity_threat", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O3", "O6"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "threatened_component_is_role_identity_belief", "predicate": "The threatened identity component is a previously established role-identity belief.", "rationale": "Safety audit passes: one context guard binds an existing role, does not restate the head, and leaves no complete guarded counterexample."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "identity_threat"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The threatened identity component is a previously established role-identity belief."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "identity_threat", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P033-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent guard audit confirms the exact candidate supplies the spine and one atomic, anchored, non-restating qualifier closes every remaining gap. Identity threat supplies the pre-existing identity-stake relation. A single subtype restriction turns that one component into the source's role-identity-belief branch without inventing a second role."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Independent counterexample test: A wholly private choice can produce the bias but fails the guard; any qualifying public choice retains the old action and commitment tie.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Choice-Supportive Bias", "one_liner": "Explain why we misremember past decisions in our own favor: dissonance reduction rewrites the stored memory so the chosen option looks better and the rejected ones worse than the evidence actually showed at the time of choice.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:choice_supportive_bias", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O7"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "prior_choice_is_public_commitment", "predicate": "The prior choice was made as a public commitment.", "rationale": "Safety audit passes: one context guard binds an existing role, does not restate the head, and leaves no complete guarded counterexample."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "choice_supportive_bias"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The prior choice was made as a public commitment."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "choice_supportive_bias", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P033-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent guard audit confirms the exact candidate supplies the spine and one atomic, anchored, non-restating qualifier closes every remaining gap. Choice-supportive bias supplies an established action bound to identity-protective commitment. One atomic public-visibility qualifier selects the public-commitment branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Independent counterexample test: A demand invented only after evidence arrives is expressly not moving the goalposts, so the prior public commitment cannot be removed.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Moving the goalposts", "one_liner": "An argumentative pattern in which, on being shown evidence that meets a previously stipulated standard, one party revises the standard upward to block the conclusion rather than accept it — repeated so that no finite evidence can settle the question.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:moving_the_goalposts", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "moving_the_goalposts"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "moving_the_goalposts", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P033-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent universal-necessity review confirms every complete exact-record instance satisfies one full DNF branch without a qualifier. Every complete instance requires a standard publicly stipulated in advance. That stipulation is an established action constituting a public commitment, satisfying one full branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Independent counterexample test: No complete impostor_syndrome instance preserving the exact signature can falsify the selected DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Impostor Syndrome", "one_liner": "The pattern in which a demonstrably capable, externally-validated person keeps a private conviction that their competence is fake, because a non-updating self-assessment channel rereads each new success as proof the deception still works rather than as evidence of ability.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:impostor_syndrome", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "impostor_syndrome"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "impostor_syndrome", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P033-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent universal-necessity review confirms every complete exact-record instance satisfies one full DNF branch without a qualifier. Every instance contains a persistent belief about the persons own competence, satisfying the belief-expertise branch."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The old belief or action is tied to expertise, role identity, public commitment, moral standing, or organizational legitimacy.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A necessary update would require changing behavior, policy, expectation, rule, or narrative, not merely learning a fact.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: A necessary update would require changing behavior, policy, expectation, rule, or narrative, not merely learning a fact. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A necessary update would require changing behavior, policy, expectation, rule, or narrative, not merely learning a fact."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "A necessary update would require changing behavior, policy, expectation, rule, or narrative, not merely learning a fact."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 22, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-022", "ledger_sha256": "5ee4a2492fc5a9807f53a77363a79d1f55eb55ca3ec19db3ac3cab077686fe47"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Distraction Minimization for Deep Engagement", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:distraction_minimization_for_deep_engagement", "slug": "distraction_minimization_for_deep_engagement"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 2, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is attention fragmentation. The person or group has a task that needs continuity, but the surrounding system keeps offering or demanding alternatives. Messages arrive. People ask quick questions. Interfaces flash cues. Workspaces expose unrelated affordances. Meetings break the day into small pieces. Learners face more salient distractions than the intended task. The result is not only lost minutes; it is lost state.\n\nThis archetype treats distraction as a system property. It asks what in the schedule, environment, interface, norms, or preparation keeps puncturing the engagement window. The root tension is that systems often value responsiveness and openness while also needing depth. Without deliberate boundaries, responsiveness expands until it consumes the continuity needed for deep work.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A person or group is expected to do work that benefits from sustained absorption, but the surrounding conditions continuously fragment attention through interruptions, alerts, ambiguous availability, noisy stimuli, unresolved setup, competing tasks, or social expectations of immediate response."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P033-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O9"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve work or a task as the bearer of the requirement, not a general human capacity.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A focal work activity is the requirement-bearing role.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must make the selected function necessary for the work, not merely helpful or occasionally present.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The work requires the selected function.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires continuity as a demand of the focal work.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The required function is continuity.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires synthesis as a demand of the focal work.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The required function is synthesis.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires problem solving as a demand of the focal work.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The required function is problem solving.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires learning as a demand of the focal work.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The required function is learning.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires careful judgment as a demand of the focal work.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The required function is careful judgment.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires creativity as a demand of the focal work.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The required function is creativity.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires emotional presence as a demand of the focal work.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "The required function is emotional presence.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "The target work requires continuity, synthesis, problem solving, learning, careful judgment, creativity, or emotional presence.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "The target work requires one listed form of sustained cognitive or relational engagement.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P033-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Attention can be brief and stimulus-bound and does not require any listed deep-work function.", "slug": "attention"}], "residual_id": "r:distraction_minimization_for_deep_engagement:b023_a01_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b023_a01_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The target work requires continuity, synthesis, problem solving, learning, careful judgment, creativity, or emotional presence. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The target work requires continuity, synthesis, problem solving, learning, careful judgment, creativity, or emotional presence."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Independent counterexample test: No complete functional_fixedness instance preserving the exact signature can falsify the selected DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Functional Fixedness", "one_liner": "The cognitive bias in which encoding an object under its conventional category label crowds out inspection of its raw physical properties, blocking the solver from a non-conventional use the problem needs and the object's properties would permit.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:functional_fixedness", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "functional_fixedness"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "functional_fixedness", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P033-C10-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent universal-necessity review confirms every complete exact-record instance satisfies one full DNF branch without a qualifier. Every instance is a focal problem-solving task whose solution requires discovering a non-conventional affordance."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Independent counterexample test: No complete operator_vigilance_dependency instance preserving the exact signature can falsify the selected DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Operator-Vigilance Dependency", "one_liner": "Name the safety configuration in which a human operator's unaided sustained attention is the final live barrier against a severe hazard, under exactly the monotony and rarity that the vigilance literature says will degrade that attention — worsened, not helped, by more upstream automation.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:operator_vigilance_dependency", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "operator_vigilance_dependency"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "operator_vigilance_dependency", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P033-C10-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent universal-necessity review confirms every complete exact-record instance satisfies one full DNF branch without a qualifier. Every instance is monitoring work that requires continuous sustained attention as its load-bearing safety function."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Independent counterexample test: A sudden emotion or new fact with no unsolved problem is expressly outside the exact epiphany identity.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Epiphany", "one_liner": "A discrete moment in which an unsolved problem suddenly reorganizes in the mind so the answer is manifest — not the acquisition of a new fact but a restructuring of the framing through which fixed facts are read, arriving abruptly across an impasse and seeming obvious in hindsight.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:epiphany", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "epiphany"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "epiphany", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P033-C10-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent universal-necessity review confirms every complete exact-record instance satisfies one full DNF branch without a qualifier. The exact cognitive identity requires an unsolved problem, impasse, and abrupt solution-producing restructuring, satisfying the problem-solving branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Independent counterexample test: If no problem-solving work or dominating solution exists, the exact Einstellung comparison cannot be instantiated.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Einstellung Effect", "one_liner": "Diagnose a skilled solver's failure on a near-surface variant not as missing knowledge but as retrieval-driven blocking — the first-cued familiar method is retrieved, judged adequate, and halts search before a simpler dominating alternative is ever compared.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:einstellung_effect", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "einstellung_effect"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "einstellung_effect", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P033-C10-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent universal-necessity review confirms every complete exact-record instance satisfies one full DNF branch without a qualifier. Every complete instance contains a skilled solver and a problem with a dominating alternative foreclosed by retrieval blocking."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The target work requires continuity, synthesis, problem solving, learning, judgment, creativity, or emotional presence.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P033-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve recurrent or sufficiently frequent interference rather than one harmless isolated event.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The selected interference occurs often enough to cross the absorption-prevention threshold.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve absorption or sustained engagement as the state being disrupted.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Sustained absorption is the affected work state.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must make the selected interference sufficient to block absorption, not merely coincide with reduced focus.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The recurrent interference prevents absorption.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires recurrent interruptions as the absorption-preventing interference.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The selected interference is interruptions.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires recurrent notifications as the absorption-preventing interference.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The selected interference is notifications.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires recurrent context switches as the absorption-preventing interference.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The selected interference is context switches.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires recurrent ambient stimuli as the absorption-preventing interference.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The selected interference is ambient stimuli.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires recurrent opportunistic requests as the absorption-preventing interference.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The selected interference is opportunistic requests.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Interruptions, notifications, context switches, ambient stimuli, or opportunistic requests occur often enough to prevent absorption.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A listed interference recurs sufficiently often to prevent sustained absorption.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P033-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Finite attentional capacity can be fully protected and does not entail recurrent interruption or failed absorption.", "slug": "attentional_capacity"}], "residual_id": "r:distraction_minimization_for_deep_engagement:b023_a01_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b023_a01_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Interruptions, notifications, context switches, ambient stimuli, or opportunistic requests occur often enough to prevent absorption. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Interruptions, notifications, context switches, ambient stimuli, or opportunistic requests occur often enough to prevent absorption."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Finite attentional capacity can be fully protected and does not entail recurrent interruption or failed absorption.", "slug": "attentional_capacity"}], "normalized_requirement": "Interruptions, notifications, context switches, ambient stimuli, or requests occur often enough to prevent absorption.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Interruptions, notifications, context switches, ambient stimuli, or requests occur often enough to prevent absorption.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P033-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a shared setting, interface, or routine that mediates attentional intrusion.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A shared environment or routine governs access to attention.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the all-signals quantifier rather than equal treatment of only a selected subset.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Every signal in scope receives the same eligibility.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve equal permission to interrupt attention, not merely equal visibility or equal content priority.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The environment treats the signals as equally eligible to intrude.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "A shared environment treats all signals as equally eligible to intrude.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A shared attention environment gives every signal equal eligibility to intrude.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P033-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Emphasis can prioritize signals successfully and does not entail an existing equal-intrusion regime.", "slug": "emphasis"}], "residual_id": "r:distraction_minimization_for_deep_engagement:b023_a01_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b023_a01_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A classroom, workplace, interface, meeting routine, or shared schedule treats all signals as equally eligible to intrude. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A classroom, workplace, interface, meeting routine, or shared schedule treats all signals as equally eligible to intrude."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Independent counterexample test: A channel that selectively blocks only consequential signals lacks the high-rate indiscriminate prompt regime and is not confirmation fatigue.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Confirmation Fatigue", "one_liner": "The interaction-design failure where a blocking confirmation prompt fires so often, and so rarely marks a truly consequential choice, that users develop an automatic dismiss reflex that discharges the prompt without reading it — leaving it syntactically present but informationally inert.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:confirmation_fatigue", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "confirmation_fatigue"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "confirmation_fatigue", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P033-C14-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent universal-necessity review confirms every complete exact-record instance satisfies one full DNF branch without a qualifier. Every complete instance uses one repeated blocking channel whose prompts demand dismissal before work can proceed, so all prompt signals receive equal eligibility to intrude regardless of consequence."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A shared environment treats all signals as equally eligible to intrude.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "People are blamed for lack of discipline even though the environment keeps soliciting their attention.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially relevant when people are being blamed for poor focus even though the system around them is designed to interrupt them. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: People are blamed for lack of discipline even though the environment keeps soliciting their attention. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["People are blamed for lack of discipline even though the environment keeps soliciting their attention.", "It is especially relevant when people are being blamed for poor focus even though the system around them is designed to interrupt them."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "People are blamed for lack of discipline even though the environment keeps soliciting their attention."}, {"display_text": "The cost of losing the thread is high relative to the apparent smallness of each interruption.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The cost of losing the thread is high relative to the apparent smallness of each interruption. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The cost of losing the thread is high relative to the apparent smallness of each interruption."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The cost of losing the thread is high relative to the apparent smallness of each interruption."}, {"display_text": "The domain requires both focus and some residual responsiveness, making total isolation unsafe or impractical.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It also applies when a team needs both focus and responsiveness: the solution is not total isolation, but explicit routing of ordinary requests, true exceptions, and reentry support. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: The domain requires both focus and some residual responsiveness, making total isolation unsafe or impractical. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The domain requires both focus and some residual responsiveness, making total isolation unsafe or impractical.", "It also applies when a team needs both focus and responsiveness: the solution is not total isolation, but explicit routing of ordinary requests, true exceptions, and reentry support."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The domain requires both focus and some residual responsiveness, making total isolation unsafe or impractical."}, {"display_text": "Existing productivity or learning efforts address motivation but not the structural source of attention fragmentation.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The structural problem is attention fragmentation. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Existing productivity or learning efforts address motivation but not the structural source of attention fragmentation. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Existing productivity or learning efforts address motivation but not the structural source of attention fragmentation.", "The structural problem is attention fragmentation."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "Existing productivity or learning efforts address motivation but not the structural source of attention fragmentation."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 23, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-023", "ledger_sha256": "f372df8035c0a1bfd8349fb8198282398e86fa9e332ac226bf6eb4adb67551f4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Distributed Authority Checks and Balances", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:distributed_authority_checks_and_balances", "slug": "distributed_authority_checks_and_balances"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 3, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 3 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Concentrated power can act coherently and quickly, but it can also define its own mandate, hide adverse evidence, select its reviewer, and make error self-validating. Fragmented power creates the opposite risk: paralysis, invisible bargaining, collusion, and responsibility diffusion. Nominal separation fails when bodies share appointment, funding, data, personnel, vendors, incentives, or patrons.\n\nThe intervention must therefore distribute function-specific authority while preserving completion, continuity, and remedy. It aims for correctable power, not maximum obstruction.\n\n### Authority allocation topology\n\nRepresent authority as a directed graph rather than an org chart. Nodes are bodies with a mandate and competence; edges are initiation, approval, information demand, stay, veto, override, appointment, funding, removal, review, enforcement, appeal, and remedy powers. Mark which powers are exclusive, concurrent, conditional, temporary, or residual. A topology exposes cycles, unchecked finality, single points of capture, and paths that never reach a legitimate decision.\n\nTopology must include informal controls. A body may lack formal veto yet control agenda, staffing, technical access, legal interpretation, evidence release, or the clock. Another may hold formal review while depending on the reviewed body for all facts. These dependencies determine effective authority and should be modeled alongside legal or written mandates.\n\n### Jurisdiction and competence\n\nEach checking body needs a defined subject-matter jurisdiction, trigger, standard of review, and remedy scope. It also needs competence: expertise, local knowledge, representation, procedural capacity, and the ability to distinguish error from reasonable discretion. Independence without competence produces arbitrary obstruction; expertise without independence produces captured validation.\n\nJurisdictions can overlap deliberately, but the design must state how conflicts are classified. One body may decide legality, another safety, another factual accuracy, another budget, and another rights remedy. The question “Who is supreme?” is often less useful than “Who is final on which issue, under what review, and with what override?”\n\n### Information asymmetry and strategic behavior\n\nAuthorities frequently know more about their action than reviewers and can control timing, classification, metrics, or record creation. Reviewers may respond with blanket demands or vetoes because they cannot discriminate risk. This produces a feedback loop of concealment and obstruction. Information rights, preservation duties, independent collection, protected sources, disclosure sanctions, and shared definitions are therefore part of power design, not administrative support.\n\nCapture and collusion can neutralize distribution. Separate bodies may share patrons, ideology, professional networks, vendors, data sources, career pipelines, or reciprocal favors. They can trade approvals or coordinate silence. Behavioral evidence—challenge rates, remedy patterns, correlated decisions, personnel movement, and retaliation—is necessary alongside structural separation.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "One body can initiate, interpret, execute, review, and finalize consequential action, or several bodies exist but their powers, information, dependencies, and remedies are too weak or entangled to constrain one another. Errors and abuses become self-validating. Alternatively, unstructured veto points let actors obstruct, bargain invisibly, or evade responsibility without producing correction."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P034-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a single actor in the common control role rather than distribute the functions among independent actors.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "One actor is the common controller.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve actor control over mandate definition.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "That actor can define its own mandate.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve evidence control by the mandate-defining actor.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The same actor can control the evidence.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve execution by the actor holding the other control roles.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The same actor can execute the action.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve challenge adjudication by that same actor rather than an independent reviewer.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The same actor can judge challenges.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "One actor can define its mandate, control evidence, execute action, and judge challenges.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "One actor can control mandate definition, evidence, execution, and challenge adjudication.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P034-C01-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Checks and balances requires independent powers capable of constraining one another, the opposite of this concentrated self-review state.", "slug": "checks_balances"}], "residual_id": "r:distributed_authority_checks_and_balances:b023_a02_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b023_a02_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The same actor can define its mandate, control evidence, execute action, and judge challenges. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The same actor can define its mandate, control evidence, execute action, and judge challenges."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Checks and balances requires independent powers capable of constraining one another, the opposite of this concentrated self-review state.", "slug": "checks_balances"}], "normalized_requirement": "One actor can define its mandate, control evidence, execute action, and judge challenges.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "One actor can define its mandate, control evidence, execute action, and judge challenges.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P034-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an actor or body performing oversight.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An oversight body is the dependent role.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the reviewed actor, not an unrelated sponsor, as the source of dependence.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The dependency source is the actor being reviewed.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the oversight-to-reviewed-actor dependency direction.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The oversight body depends on the reviewed actor.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires reviewed-actor control of oversight funding.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The dependency concerns budget.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires oversight dependence on the reviewed actor for evidence or data access.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The dependency concerns data.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires reviewed-actor control of oversight staffing resources.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The dependency concerns staffing.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires the reviewed actor to control appointment of oversight personnel.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The dependency concerns appointment.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires the reviewed actor to control removal of oversight personnel.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The dependency concerns removal.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Oversight depends on the reviewed actor for budget, data, staffing, appointment, or removal.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An oversight body depends on the actor it reviews for at least one listed control resource.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P034-C02-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Separated powers can be institutionally independent and do not require oversight dependence on the reviewed actor.", "slug": "separation_of_powers"}], "residual_id": "r:distributed_authority_checks_and_balances:b023_a02_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b023_a02_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Oversight bodies depend on the reviewed actor for budget, data, staffing, appointment, or removal. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Oversight bodies depend on the reviewed actor for budget, data, staffing, appointment, or removal."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Separated powers can be institutionally independent and do not require oversight dependence on the reviewed actor.", "slug": "separation_of_powers"}], "normalized_requirement": "Oversight depends on the reviewed actor for budget, data, staffing, appointment, or removal.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Oversight depends on the reviewed actor for budget, data, staffing, appointment, or removal.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P034-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an action rather than a standing institution as the bypassing role.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An action is the focal event.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve routine review as the process bypassed.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Ordinary review is the bypassed process.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve bypass capability, not only an actual reviewed action.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The action is capable of bypassing ordinary review.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires emergency status as the action type.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The action is an emergency action.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires confidentiality as the action type or restriction.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The action is confidential.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Emergency or confidential action can bypass ordinary review.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An emergency or confidential action can bypass ordinary review.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P034-C04-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Checks and balances can apply without any emergency or confidentiality bypass.", "slug": "checks_balances"}], "residual_id": "r:distributed_authority_checks_and_balances:b023_a02_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b023_a02_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Ordinary supervisory review, peer verification, separation of duties, or appeal may be proportionate. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Emergency or confidential action can bypass ordinary review.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Emergency or confidential action can bypass ordinary review.", "Ordinary supervisory review, peer verification, separation of duties, or appeal may be proportionate."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Checks and balances can apply without any emergency or confidentiality bypass.", "slug": "checks_balances"}], "normalized_requirement": "Emergency or confidential action can bypass ordinary review.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Emergency or confidential action can bypass ordinary review.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Decisions affect rights, resources, security, access, rules, appointments, sanctions, or irreversible commitments.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use it where decisions affect rights, resources, security, access, rules, appointments, sanctions, or irreversible commitments and one actor can otherwise define, execute, conceal, and review its own power. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Decisions affect rights, resources, security, access, rules, appointments, sanctions, or irreversible commitments. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Decisions affect rights, resources, security, access, rules, appointments, sanctions, or irreversible commitments.", "Use it where decisions affect rights, resources, security, access, rules, appointments, sanctions, or irreversible commitments and one actor can otherwise define, execute, conceal, and review its own power."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "Decisions affect rights, resources, security, access, rules, appointments, sanctions, or irreversible commitments."}, {"display_text": "A single failure or capture can propagate system-wide.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A topology exposes cycles, unchecked finality, single points of capture, and paths that never reach a legitimate decision. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: A single failure or capture can propagate system-wide. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A single failure or capture can propagate system-wide.", "A topology exposes cycles, unchecked finality, single points of capture, and paths that never reach a legitimate decision."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "A single failure or capture can propagate system-wide."}, {"display_text": "Multiple authorized bodies need a predictable way to disagree without collapse or domination.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when formal overseers depend on the reviewed actor for information, budget, tenure, or removal, or when multiple bodies lack a legitimate way to complete action through disagreement. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: Multiple authorized bodies need a predictable way to disagree without collapse or domination. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Multiple authorized bodies need a predictable way to disagree without collapse or domination.", "It is especially useful when formal overseers depend on the reviewed actor for information, budget, tenure, or removal, or when multiple bodies lack a legitimate way to complete action through disagreement."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Multiple authorized bodies need a predictable way to disagree without collapse or domination."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 23, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-023", "ledger_sha256": "f372df8035c0a1bfd8349fb8198282398e86fa9e332ac226bf6eb4adb67551f4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": [{"groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Holding the complete rules of engagement ambiguity record and qualifier 'The resulting behavioral fragmentation reaches the whole system.' fixed, I varied optional manifestations and found no instance that falsifies the selected DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Rules-of-Engagement Ambiguity", "one_liner": "Diagnose frontline breakdown under time pressure as a grain mismatch — decision rules written coarser than the environment generates choice points — paid out of a finite discretion budget, relocating the fix from the operator's judgment to the rule, escalation path, and pre-positioned authority.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:rules_of_engagement_ambiguity", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O3"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "behavioral_fragmentation_reaches_whole_system", "predicate": "The resulting behavioral fragmentation reaches the whole system.", "rationale": "The candidate supplies the structural spine and the single qualifier is anchored, atomic, non-restating, and sufficient for one complete DNF branch."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "rules_of_engagement_ambiguity"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "behavioral_fragmentation_reaches_whole_system"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "rules_of_engagement_ambiguity", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P034-C03-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact rule-grain impairment is one failure locus capable of fragmenting behavior; the atomic whole-system scope guard supplies the only missing failure-branch obligation."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Holding the complete flp impossibility record fixed, I varied optional manifestations and found no instance that falsifies the selected DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "FLP Impossibility", "one_liner": "Prove that no deterministic algorithm can guarantee both agreement and termination for consensus in an asynchronous system with even one crash-fault — by showing an adversarial message schedule can keep the system perpetually undecided.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:flp_impossibility", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "flp_impossibility"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "flp_impossibility", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P034-C03-U1", "why_it_fits": "One crash-fault is a single failure locus whose admissible effect can prevent agreement or termination across the consensus system, satisfying the failure branch without a qualifier."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Holding the complete commanders intent ambiguity record fixed, I varied optional manifestations and found no instance that falsifies the selected DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Commander's-Intent Ambiguity", "one_liner": "Locate incoherent decentralized execution in the purpose artefact one level up: when delegated subordinates must re-derive action under changed conditions but the intent statement is too imprecise to disambiguate their choice, locally rational actions aggregate into globally incoherent outcomes.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:commanders_intent_ambiguity", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "commanders_intent_ambiguity"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "commanders_intent_ambiguity", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P034-C03-U1", "why_it_fits": "The single ambiguous intent artifact is an impaired locus whose ambiguity can propagate through delegated interpretation into globally incoherent execution."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Holding the complete requirements churn record fixed, I varied optional manifestations and found no instance that falsifies the selected DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Requirements Churn", "one_liner": "A project pathology in which the specification changes faster than the execution organization can absorb it — a control-theoretic case where the reference signal outruns the controller's bandwidth, so no spec lives long enough for work to consolidate against it.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:requirements_churn", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "requirements_churn"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "requirements_churn", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P034-C03-U1", "why_it_fits": "The unstable specification is one impaired control locus whose changes can prevent consolidation across the execution organization, satisfying the system-wide failure branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Holding the complete bus factor record and qualifier 'The bus-factor count is exactly one.' fixed, I varied optional manifestations and found no instance that falsifies the selected DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Bus Factor", "one_liner": "The minimum number of team members whose sudden simultaneous loss would halt a project — a per-capability count of how many people could take a subsystem, credential, or relationship over tomorrow, exposing where tacit human knowledge is dangerously concentrated.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:bus_factor", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "QUANTIFIER_BINDING", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "bus_factor_equals_one", "predicate": "The bus-factor count is exactly one.", "rationale": "The candidate supplies the structural spine and the single qualifier is anchored, atomic, non-restating, and sufficient for one complete DNF branch."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "bus_factor"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "bus_factor_equals_one"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "bus_factor", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P034-C03-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record supplies project-wide continuity failure from holder loss; binding the bus-factor count to one atomically supplies the single-locus quantifier."}], "publication_role": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT_ONLY", "source_residual_occurrence_id": "r:distributed_authority_checks_and_balances:b023_a02_c4", "unit": {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P034-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a single-source impairment rather than requiring multiple independent failures.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "One impaired locus is sufficient as the propagation source.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve propagation capability, not merely co-occurrence.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The impairment is capable of propagating effects.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve whole-system reach rather than a bounded local effect.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The possible propagation reaches system-wide scope.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a failure event or condition at the source locus.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The single impairment is a failure.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires capture of the source locus rather than ordinary failure.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The single impairment is capture.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "A single failure or capture can propagate system-wide.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A single impaired locus can propagate effects across the system.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P034-C03-U1"}}]}
{"archetype": {"name": "Distributed Coordination Architecture", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:distributed_coordination_architecture", "slug": "distributed_coordination_architecture"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 2, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 2, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Coordination problems arise from distributed control plus consequential interdependence. Different actors see different state, control different resources, operate on different clocks, answer to different authorities, and optimize against different local measures. No one has a complete or current picture. A changed commitment in one place becomes an unanticipated constraint elsewhere. A local exception propagates through interfaces that were never designed to carry it.\n\nThe absence of command is not itself a defect. Distributed control preserves local knowledge, specialization, legitimacy, resilience, and speed. The defect is leaving the relationships among local decisions implicit. When dependencies are hidden, actors cannot distinguish work they may conduct independently from work requiring notification, consultation, joint decision, synchronization, or escalation.\n\nThree mismatches commonly compound. First, the coordination topology does not fit the dependency topology: all-to-all meetings serve a network that needs stable interfaces, or a central hub serves work that requires peer adaptation. Second, information structure does not fit decision structure: actors receive too much irrelevant state and too little timely exception information. Third, authority structure does not fit consequence: local actors need central approval for reversible choices while irreversible cross-boundary choices escape joint review.\n\nCoordination also fails when success is measured locally. Each actor can meet its target while the collective result degrades through waiting, rework, exclusion, duplicated capacity, unsafe transitions, or shifted externalities. Without a shared outcome contract and system-level health signals, local reports can conceal coordination failure.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Multiple actors control different actions, resources, information, or decisions that must combine into one outcome, yet no actor can directly command the whole system and no shared architecture reliably translates interdependence into commitments, timing, signals, and resolution paths."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires individually dominant rational moves to produce the unique collectively Pareto-inferior equilibrium.", "role_mapping": "Separate rational actors -> players following dominant moves; incoherent result -> collectively worse equilibrium.", "slug": "social_dilemma", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b023_a03_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Each actor can meet its target while the collective result degrades through waiting, rework, exclusion, duplicated capacity, unsafe transitions, or shifted externalities. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Separate actors can each act rationally yet create an incoherent collective result.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Separate actors can each act rationally yet create an incoherent collective result.", "Each actor can meet its target while the collective result degrades through waiting, rework, exclusion, duplicated capacity, unsafe transitions, or shifted externalities."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Social Dilemma", "one_liner": "Individually rational defection yields a collectively worse outcome (canonical form: the Prisoner's Dilemma).", "page_ref": "prime:social_dilemma", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Separate rational actors -> players following dominant moves; incoherent result -> collectively worse equilibrium.", "slug": "social_dilemma", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires individually dominant rational moves to produce the unique collectively Pareto-inferior equilibrium."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Separate actors can each act rationally yet create an incoherent collective result.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P034-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve dependence rather than mere adjacency.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A dependency relation is present.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve different authority scopes on the dependency's endpoints.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The dependency endpoints lie in distinct authority domains.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the boundary-spanning dependency relation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The dependency crosses the authority boundary.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Dependencies cross authority boundaries.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A dependency connects roles across an authority boundary.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P034-C05-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P034-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a transfer between distinct operational roles.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A handoff has originating and receiving roles.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the handoff relation rather than static co-membership.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The handoff transfers work, information, or control.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve different authority domains on the two sides of the handoff.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The originating and receiving roles lie across an authority boundary.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Handoffs cross authority boundaries.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A handoff transfers work or control across an authority boundary.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P034-C05-U2"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P034-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a resource rather than an unrelated shared attribute.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A resource is the focal shared object.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve joint use, access, or dependence on the same resource.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Multiple actors or functions share the resource.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve distinct authority domains among the resource-sharing roles.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The sharing roles lie across an authority boundary.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Shared resources cross authority boundaries.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A resource is shared across an authority boundary.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P034-C05-U3"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P034-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an external effect rather than an internal cost or benefit.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An externality is the focal effect.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an originating activity-to-effect direction.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Activity under one authority produces the externality.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve cross-authority reach of the effect.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The externality affects a different authority domain.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Externalities cross authority boundaries.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An externality produced under one authority affects another authority domain.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P034-C05-U4"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Interdependent tasks can lie within one actor's authority and need not cross any governance boundary.", "slug": "task_interdependence"}], "residual_id": "r:distributed_coordination_architecture:b023_a03_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b023_a03_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Dependencies, handoffs, shared resources, or externalities cross authority boundaries. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Dependencies, handoffs, shared resources, or externalities cross authority boundaries."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PARTIALLY_DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Holding the complete fallacy of one administrator record fixed, I varied optional manifestations and found no instance that falsifies the selected DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Fallacy of One Administrator", "one_liner": "Reason about a deployed system as though one authority governs every node it depends on, when it actually crosses many independently-governed administrative domains — so failures concentrate at the unmodeled seams between them.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:fallacy_of_one_administrator", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "fallacy_of_one_administrator"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "fallacy_of_one_administrator", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P034-C05-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every instance contains a dependency graph whose endpoints cross independently governed administrative domains."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Holding the complete ecosystem mismatch record and qualifier 'The required complementary asset is governed by an authority domain distinct from the deploying authority.' fixed, I varied optional manifestations and found no instance that falsifies the selected DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Ecosystem Mismatch", "one_liner": "Explain why a technically sound innovation stalls on deployment not by a flaw in the artifact but by the absence of one specific complementary asset its operating context tacitly required — leaving it complete-but-functionally-blocked.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:ecosystem_mismatch", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2", "O3"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "complement_governed_by_distinct_authority", "predicate": "The required complementary asset is governed by an authority domain distinct from the deploying authority.", "rationale": "The candidate supplies the structural spine and the single qualifier is anchored, atomic, non-restating, and sufficient for one complete DNF branch."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "ecosystem_mismatch"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "complement_governed_by_distinct_authority"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "ecosystem_mismatch", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P034-C05-U1", "why_it_fits": "The required complementary asset is already the dependency source; the single authority-separation fact makes that dependency cross an authority boundary."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Holding the complete transfer learning attack record and qualifier 'The upstream component and dependent downstream system lie under distinct authority domains.' fixed, I varied optional manifestations and found no instance that falsifies the selected DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Transfer-Learning Attack", "one_liner": "Vulnerabilities, backdoors, or poisoned representations baked into an upstream pretrained model ride intact into every downstream system built on it, because the downstream team's audit boundary encloses only its new layers while the attack surface spans the whole inherited substrate.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:transfer_learning_attack", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2", "O3"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "upstream_and_downstream_have_distinct_authorities", "predicate": "The upstream component and dependent downstream system lie under distinct authority domains.", "rationale": "The candidate supplies the structural spine and the single qualifier is anchored, atomic, non-restating, and sufficient for one complete DNF branch."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "transfer_learning_attack"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "upstream_and_downstream_have_distinct_authorities"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "transfer_learning_attack", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P034-C05-U1", "why_it_fits": "The downstream system depends on the inherited upstream model; one authority-separation fact supplies the cross-boundary endpoint typing."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_GUARDED_EQUIVALENT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Holding the complete handoff loss record and qualifier 'The sending actor and receiving actor occupy distinct authority domains.' fixed, I varied optional manifestations and found no instance that falsifies the selected DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Handoff Loss", "one_liner": "Locate post-transition failures at the transfer relation itself: work crossing a boundary between actors arrives degraded because a bounded artifact cannot carry the sender's tacit state, so downstream decisions run on an impoverished reconstruction.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:handoff_loss", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O3"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "handoff_actors_in_distinct_authority_domains", "predicate": "The sending actor and receiving actor occupy distinct authority domains.", "rationale": "The candidate supplies the structural spine and the single qualifier is anchored, atomic, non-restating, and sufficient for one complete DNF branch."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "handoff_loss"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "handoff_actors_in_distinct_authority_domains"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "handoff_loss", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P034-C05-U2", "why_it_fits": "The exact handoff already transfers in-flight work and state between sender and receiver; the equivalent authority-domain guards supply only endpoint governance."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Holding the complete collaborative maintenance record and qualifier 'The artifact's participating contributor roles are governed by distinct authorities.' fixed, I varied optional manifestations and found no instance that falsifies the selected DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Collaborative Maintenance", "one_liner": "Keep a shared knowledge artifact current through an open community working under five documented-and-exercised governance pathways — proposal, review, dispute resolution, deprecation, and attribution — rather than a single custodian.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:collaborative_maintenance", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O3"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "contributors_have_distinct_authorities", "predicate": "The artifact's participating contributor roles are governed by distinct authorities.", "rationale": "The candidate supplies the structural spine and the single qualifier is anchored, atomic, non-restating, and sufficient for one complete DNF branch."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "collaborative_maintenance"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "contributors_have_distinct_authorities"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "collaborative_maintenance", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P034-C05-U3", "why_it_fits": "The shared knowledge artifact is a resource jointly used and maintained by a plural community; the guard adds only distinct authority domains to those existing participants."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Holding the complete common operating picture breakdown record and qualifier 'The response participants occupy at least two distinct authority domains.' fixed, I varied optional manifestations and found no instance that falsifies the selected DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Common-Operating-Picture Breakdown", "one_liner": "The failure mode where a multi-party response acts incoherently because its engineered shared picture fails to synthesise participants' partial views — relocating the fault from the responders to the artefact, whose currency, completeness, and consistency become the lever.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:common_operating_picture_breakdown", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O3"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "cop_participants_span_authority_domains", "predicate": "The response participants occupy at least two distinct authority domains.", "rationale": "The candidate supplies the structural spine and the single qualifier is anchored, atomic, non-restating, and sufficient for one complete DNF branch."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "common_operating_picture_breakdown"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "cop_participants_span_authority_domains"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "common_operating_picture_breakdown", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P034-C05-U3", "why_it_fits": "The engineered common picture is an information resource shared by multiple response participants; the guard supplies only their cross-authority distribution."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Holding the complete transfer learning attack record and qualifier 'The upstream-origin function and a downstream reuse function lie under distinct authority domains.' fixed, I varied optional manifestations and found no instance that falsifies the selected DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Transfer-Learning Attack", "one_liner": "Vulnerabilities, backdoors, or poisoned representations baked into an upstream pretrained model ride intact into every downstream system built on it, because the downstream team's audit boundary encloses only its new layers while the attack surface spans the whole inherited substrate.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:transfer_learning_attack", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O3"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "component_sharers_have_distinct_authorities", "predicate": "The upstream-origin function and a downstream reuse function lie under distinct authority domains.", "rationale": "The candidate supplies the structural spine and the single qualifier is anchored, atomic, non-restating, and sufficient for one complete DNF branch."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "transfer_learning_attack"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "component_sharers_have_distinct_authorities"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "transfer_learning_attack", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P034-C05-U3", "why_it_fits": "The pretrained model is an inherited resource used by upstream and downstream functions; one authority-separation fact supplies the remaining boundary condition."}], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 4, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 3, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Interdependent tasks can lie within one actor's authority and need not cross any governance boundary.", "slug": "task_interdependence"}], "normalized_requirement": "Dependencies, handoffs, resources, or externalities cross authority boundaries.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "PARTIAL_EXISTING_DSA_GROUNDING", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation grounded 3 of 4 eligible atomic units; the remaining unit or units stayed open."}, "predicate": "Dependencies, handoffs, resources, or externalities cross authority boundaries.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P034-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a plural plan set.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Multiple local plans are evaluated.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve local plausibility rather than local infeasibility.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Each local plan is individually plausible.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the individual-versus-joint comparison over the same plan set.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The same plans are also evaluated as a joint combination.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve joint infeasibility rather than mere suboptimality.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The joint combination is infeasible.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Local plans are individually plausible but jointly infeasible.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Multiple local plans are individually plausible yet jointly infeasible.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P034-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Coordination can align locally feasible plans successfully and does not require an existing joint infeasibility.", "slug": "coordination"}], "residual_id": "r:distributed_coordination_architecture:b023_a03_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b023_a03_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Local plans are individually plausible but jointly infeasible. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Local plans are individually plausible but jointly infeasible."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Holding the complete s op disconnect record fixed, I varied optional manifestations and found no instance that falsifies the selected DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "S&OP Disconnect", "one_liner": "Diagnose a firm's downstream execution crises as an upstream planning defect — separate functions each holding an internally sound but mutually incompatible plan for the same future, because no binding forum reconciles them before commitments are taken.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:s_op_disconnect", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "s_op_disconnect"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "s_op_disconnect", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P034-C06-U1", "why_it_fits": "Separate functions hold internally plausible plans for the same future that are mutually incompatible as a joint plan set."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Local plans are individually plausible but jointly infeasible.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P034-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve multiple actors holding or relying on the information.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "At least two actors are information-holding roles.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve information rather than an unrelated incomplete resource.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Information is the focal object.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require missing relevant information, not merely uncertainty with complete evidence.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The actors' information is incomplete.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Actors hold incomplete information.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Actors' relevant information is incomplete.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P034-C07-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P034-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve multiple actors whose information availability is at issue.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "At least two actors are information-receiving or holding roles.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve information rather than delayed action or material.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Information is the delayed object.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve late information availability rather than mere incompleteness.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The information is delayed relative to its relevant use.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "Actors hold delayed information.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Actors' relevant information arrives or becomes available late.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P034-C07-U2"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P034-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve plural interpreting actors.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "At least two actors interpret the information.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve information as the common object of interpretation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Relevant information is the interpreted object.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve actual interpretive non-alignment rather than different access alone.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The actors' interpretations differ.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Actors hold differently interpreted information.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Actors interpret relevant information differently.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P034-C07-U3"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P034-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve multiple actors holding information.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "At least two actors hold the focal information.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve information rather than a confidential action or identity.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Information is the restricted object.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require a confidentiality restriction on the information.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The information is confidential.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Actors hold confidential information.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Actors hold information subject to confidentiality restriction.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P034-C07-U4"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Actors can coordinate with complete, timely, shared information; information impairment is optional.", "slug": "coordination"}], "residual_id": "r:distributed_coordination_architecture:b023_a03_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b023_a03_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Second, information structure does not fit decision structure: actors receive too much irrelevant state and too little timely exception information. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Actors hold incomplete, delayed, differently interpreted, or confidential information.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Actors hold incomplete, delayed, differently interpreted, or confidential information.", "Second, information structure does not fit decision structure: actors receive too much irrelevant state and too little timely exception information."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PARTIALLY_DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Holding the complete common operating picture breakdown record fixed, I varied optional manifestations and found no instance that falsifies the selected DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Common-Operating-Picture Breakdown", "one_liner": "The failure mode where a multi-party response acts incoherently because its engineered shared picture fails to synthesise participants' partial views — relocating the fault from the responders to the artefact, whose currency, completeness, and consistency become the lever.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:common_operating_picture_breakdown", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "common_operating_picture_breakdown"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "common_operating_picture_breakdown", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P034-C07-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record necessarily contains multiple participants whose partial relevant views leave the engineered shared picture incomplete."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Holding the complete handoff loss record fixed, I varied optional manifestations and found no instance that falsifies the selected DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Handoff Loss", "one_liner": "Locate post-transition failures at the transfer relation itself: work crossing a boundary between actors arrives degraded because a bounded artifact cannot carry the sender's tacit state, so downstream decisions run on an impoverished reconstruction.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:handoff_loss", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "handoff_loss"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "handoff_loss", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P034-C07-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every handoff-loss instance has sending and receiving actors and missing tacit state in the information available after transfer."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Holding the complete common operating picture breakdown record and qualifier 'The common-operating-picture failure mode is lag.' fixed, I varied optional manifestations and found no instance that falsifies the selected DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Common-Operating-Picture Breakdown", "one_liner": "The failure mode where a multi-party response acts incoherently because its engineered shared picture fails to synthesise participants' partial views — relocating the fault from the responders to the artefact, whose currency, completeness, and consistency become the lever.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:common_operating_picture_breakdown", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O3"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "cop_failure_mode_is_lag", "predicate": "The common-operating-picture failure mode is lag.", "rationale": "The candidate supplies the structural spine and the single qualifier is anchored, atomic, non-restating, and sufficient for one complete DNF branch."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "common_operating_picture_breakdown"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "cop_failure_mode_is_lag"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "common_operating_picture_breakdown", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P034-C07-U2", "why_it_fits": "The common-picture structure supplies plural actors and information; selecting lag as the failure mode atomically supplies late availability."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Holding the complete commanders intent ambiguity record fixed, I varied optional manifestations and found no instance that falsifies the selected DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Commander's-Intent Ambiguity", "one_liner": "Locate incoherent decentralized execution in the purpose artefact one level up: when delegated subordinates must re-derive action under changed conditions but the intent statement is too imprecise to disambiguate their choice, locally rational actions aggregate into globally incoherent outcomes.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:commanders_intent_ambiguity", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "commanders_intent_ambiguity"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "commanders_intent_ambiguity", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P034-C07-U3", "why_it_fits": "Delegated subordinates interpret the same imprecise intent artifact differently, necessarily satisfying the plural interpretive-nonalignment relation."}], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 4, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 3, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Actors can coordinate with complete, timely, shared information; information impairment is optional.", "slug": "coordination"}], "normalized_requirement": "Actors hold incomplete, delayed, differently interpreted, or confidential information.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "PARTIAL_EXISTING_DSA_GROUNDING", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation grounded 3 of 4 eligible atomic units; the remaining unit or units stayed open."}, "predicate": "Actors hold incomplete, delayed, differently interpreted, or confidential information.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P034-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an ordinary interaction regime rather than unrelated system output.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Normal interaction is the focal operating relation.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require failure rather than degraded but successful interaction.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The normal interaction fails.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the disruption-to-interaction-failure conditional direction without requiring an unstated causal mechanism.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The failure occurs when the listed disruption occurs.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires an exception event.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The disruption is an exception.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires conflict among relevant actors or actions.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The disruption is conflict.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a shortfall condition.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The disruption is a shortfall.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires departure of a participating actor.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The disruption is actor exit.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Normal interaction fails under exception, conflict, shortfall, or actor exit.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Normal interaction fails when at least one listed disruption occurs.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P034-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A coordination architecture can handle exceptions and exits; the prime does not entail failure of normal interaction.", "slug": "coordination"}], "residual_id": "r:distributed_coordination_architecture:b023_a03_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b023_a03_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Normal interaction fails when an exception, conflict, shortfall, or actor exit occurs. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Normal interaction fails when an exception, conflict, shortfall, or actor exit occurs."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Holding the complete unity of command breakdown record fixed, I varied optional manifestations and found no instance that falsifies the selected DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Unity-of-Command Breakdown", "one_liner": "The command-and-control failure in which one subordinate node in the authority graph carries two or more binding in-edges for the same task at the same time, so that when the supervisors' orders diverge the actor cannot comply with both.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:unity_of_command_breakdown", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "unity_of_command_breakdown"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "unity_of_command_breakdown", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P034-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "Normal command interaction fails when simultaneous binding orders conflict, satisfying the complete conflict branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Holding the complete handoff loss record fixed, I varied optional manifestations and found no instance that falsifies the selected DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Handoff Loss", "one_liner": "Locate post-transition failures at the transfer relation itself: work crossing a boundary between actors arrives degraded because a bounded artifact cannot carry the sender's tacit state, so downstream decisions run on an impoverished reconstruction.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:handoff_loss", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "handoff_loss"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "handoff_loss", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P034-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "A normal handoff relation fails because its bounded transfer artifact carries too little relevant state, directly satisfying the shortfall branch."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Normal interaction fails under exception, conflict, shortfall, or actor exit.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Coordination demand changes with scale, urgency, uncertainty, or coupling.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Coordination demand changes with scale, urgency, uncertainty, or coupling. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Coordination demand changes with scale, urgency, uncertainty, or coupling."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Coordination demand changes with scale, urgency, uncertainty, or coupling."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 23, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-023", "ledger_sha256": "f372df8035c0a1bfd8349fb8198282398e86fa9e332ac226bf6eb4adb67551f4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": [{"groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Holding the complete meeting inflation record and qualifier 'Dependency density is a measure of coupling among the participating sub-teams.' fixed, I varied optional manifestations and found no instance that falsifies the selected DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_BRIDGE", "name": "Meeting Inflation", "one_liner": "The organizational pathology in which coordination meetings multiply until they consume more capacity than the work they coordinate — driven by coordination cost scaling super-linearly with dependency density while each scheduler prices a meeting linearly.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:meeting_inflation", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O6"], "guard_type": "TYPE_SUBSUMPTION", "kind": "INTERPRETIVE_BRIDGE", "normalized_key": "dependency_density_is_coupling_measure", "predicate": "Dependency density is a measure of coupling among the participating sub-teams.", "rationale": "The candidate supplies the structural spine and the single qualifier is anchored, atomic, non-restating, and sufficient for one complete DNF branch."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "meeting_inflation"}, {"kind": "INTERPRETIVE_BRIDGE", "value": "dependency_density_is_coupling_measure"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "meeting_inflation", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P034-C08-U1", "why_it_fits": "Meeting inflation directly varies coordination demand with dependency density; the general graph-theoretic bridge types dependency density as coupling."}], "publication_role": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT_ONLY", "source_residual_occurrence_id": "r:distributed_coordination_architecture:b023_a03_c5", "unit": {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P034-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve coordination demand rather than generic workload.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Coordination demand is the changing dependent quantity.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve actual variation with the factor, not merely simultaneous presence.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Coordination demand changes with an operating factor.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires coordination demand to vary with scale.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The factor is scale.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires coordination demand to vary with urgency.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The factor is urgency.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires coordination demand to vary with uncertainty.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The factor is uncertainty.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires coordination demand to vary with coupling.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The factor is coupling.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Coordination demand changes with scale, urgency, uncertainty, or coupling.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Coordination demand changes with at least one listed operating factor.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P034-C08-U1"}}]}
{"archetype": {"name": "Distributional-Assumption Governance", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:distributional_assumption_governance", "slug": "distributional_assumption_governance"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 4 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Many workflows select a familiar distribution before clarifying what quantity, unit, population, horizon, or decision it represents. Software then estimates parameters and reports precision conditional on that choice. The conditional uncertainty looks rigorous while structural uncertainty about family, support, tails, dependence, observation, and regime remains hidden.\n\nObserved shape is not automatically process shape. Aggregation can create smoothness; selection can remove low or high values; censoring can compress tails; mixtures can imitate heavy dispersion; clustering can make independent-looking records share causes. A good fit near the center can coexist with catastrophic error at a decision threshold.\n\nThe root tension is productive commitment versus unjustified certainty. Some assumption is often necessary to learn efficiently and act. Yet convenience, precedent, or thin evidence can harden a provisional family into infrastructure. Mature governance preserves useful structure while making its scope, alternatives, consequences, and expiry visible.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Statistical and operational decisions often inherit a distributional family from convention, software defaults, thin data, or center-fit diagnostics. The commitment remains invisible even though support, tails, mixtures, dependence, missingness, and regime assumptions control uncertainty and action."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a probability-family commitment imposed to make statistical inference or forecasting tractable.", "role_mapping": "Listed output -> inferential result; probability model -> assumed distribution family.", "slug": "distributional_assumption", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b023_a04_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use it when a probability-distribution commitment materially affects an estimate, forecast, interval, simulation, allocation, reserve, threshold, or automated decision. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: An estimate, interval, forecast, threshold, reserve, or ranking depends on a probability model.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["an estimate, interval, forecast, threshold, reserve, or ranking depends on a probability model", "Use it when a probability-distribution commitment materially affects an estimate, forecast, interval, simulation, allocation, reserve, threshold, or automated decision."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Distributional Assumption", "one_liner": "Commitment to assume uncertain quantities follow specific distribution.", "page_ref": "prime:distributional_assumption", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Listed output -> inferential result; probability model -> assumed distribution family.", "slug": "distributional_assumption", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a probability-family commitment imposed to make statistical inference or forecasting tractable."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "An estimate, interval, forecast, threshold, reserve, or ranking depends on a probability model.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P034-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a model rather than generic knowledge or policy.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A model is the reused object.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an originating scope against which reuse is compared.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The model has an original applicability scope.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve actual reuse and scope crossing rather than a mere proposal to reuse.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The model is used again outside that original scope.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires transfer beyond the model's original population.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The crossed scope boundary is the original population.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires transfer beyond the model's original operating or distributional regime.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The crossed scope boundary is the original regime.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "A model is reused beyond its original population or regime.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A model is reused outside at least one listed original scope.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P034-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A distributional assumption can be used only within its original population and regime.", "slug": "distributional_assumption"}], "residual_id": "r:distributional_assumption_governance:b023_a04_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b023_a04_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A model is reused beyond its original population or regime. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["a model is reused beyond its original population or regime"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A distributional assumption can be used only within its original population and regime.", "slug": "distributional_assumption"}], "normalized_requirement": "A model is reused beyond its original population or regime.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A model is reused beyond its original population or regime.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P034-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve model or assumption misspecification rather than an unrelated operational error.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Misspecification is the underlying error condition.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a consequential action role.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "An action operates under or on the misspecification.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve amplification rather than mere exposure to the error.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The action increases the impact of the misspecification.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires automation of the amplifying action.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The action is automated.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires inability to reverse the amplifying action or its committed result.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The action is irreversible.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "Automated or irreversible action amplifies misspecification.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An automated or irreversible action increases the impact of misspecification.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P034-C13-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The assumption can support reversible human analysis with no automated action.", "slug": "distributional_assumption"}], "residual_id": "r:distributional_assumption_governance:b023_a04_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b023_a04_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use a lighter implementation for reversible, low-stakes description and a stronger implementation for safety, rights, solvency, irreversible investment, or automated decisions. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Automated or irreversible action amplifies misspecification.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["automated or irreversible action amplifies misspecification", "Use a lighter implementation for reversible, low-stakes description and a stronger implementation for safety, rights, solvency, irreversible investment, or automated decisions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The assumption can support reversible human analysis with no automated action.", "slug": "distributional_assumption"}], "normalized_requirement": "Automated or irreversible action amplifies misspecification.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Automated or irreversible action amplifies misspecification.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The distributional family is inherited or implicit rather than deliberately exposed and governed.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The distributional family is inherited or implicit rather than deliberately exposed and governed.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "tail or boundary behavior drives consequence.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: tail or boundary behavior drives consequence. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["tail or boundary behavior drives consequence"]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "tail or boundary behavior drives consequence"}, {"display_text": "data are sparse, censored, selected, clustered, or nonstationary.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially important when support, zeros, mixtures, tails, dependence, censoring, selection, sparse evidence, or regime change can alter the conclusion. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: data are sparse, censored, selected, clustered, or nonstationary. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["data are sparse, censored, selected, clustered, or nonstationary", "It is especially important when support, zeros, mixtures, tails, dependence, censoring, selection, sparse evidence, or regime change can alter the conclusion."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "data are sparse, censored, selected, clustered, or nonstationary"}, {"display_text": "credible alternative families produce different decisions.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Statistical and operational decisions often inherit a distributional family from convention, software defaults, thin data, or center-fit diagnostics. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: credible alternative families produce different decisions. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["credible alternative families produce different decisions", "Statistical and operational decisions often inherit a distributional family from convention, software defaults, thin data, or center-fit diagnostics."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "credible alternative families produce different decisions"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 23, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-023", "ledger_sha256": "f372df8035c0a1bfd8349fb8198282398e86fa9e332ac226bf6eb4adb67551f4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": [{"groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Holding the complete cherry picking record fixed, I varied optional manifestations and found no instance that falsifies the selected DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Cherry Picking", "one_liner": "Selectively presenting confirming evidence while suppressing disconfirming evidence from the same available population, so the offered sample gives an impression the full distribution would not support — locating the dishonesty in the selection process, not the individual data points.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:cherry_picking", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "cherry_picking"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "cherry_picking", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P034-C10-U3", "why_it_fits": "The deliberate selection process determines which records from the available evidence population enter the offered sample."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Holding the complete outbreak underascertainment record fixed, I varied optional manifestations and found no instance that falsifies the selected DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Outbreak Underascertainment", "one_liner": "The surveillance failure in which recorded case counts fall systematically below the true count because a multi-stage detection pipeline — symptom expression, care-seeking, testing, confirmation, reporting — filters cases with biased attenuation at each layer.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:outbreak_underascertainment", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "outbreak_underascertainment"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "outbreak_underascertainment", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P034-C10-U3", "why_it_fits": "The multi-stage detection pipeline determines which true cases enter the recorded surveillance data set."}], "publication_role": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT_ONLY", "source_residual_occurrence_id": "r:distributional_assumption_governance:b023_a04_c3", "unit": {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P034-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a focal data set or analytic sample whose membership is selected.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The focal data set or analytic sample is the selected outcome.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve directed selection determining inclusion in the focal data set or analytic sample, without imposing a collection, observation, or analysis-stage restriction.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A selection process determines inclusion in the focal data set or analytic sample.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Data are selected.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A selection process determines inclusion in the focal data set or analytic sample.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P034-C10-U3"}}]}
{"archetype": {"name": "Divergence-Convergence Cycle Orchestration", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:divergence_convergence_cycle_orchestration", "slug": "divergence_convergence_cycle_orchestration"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Design work has to perform two incompatible jobs. It must create enough genuine variation to escape the first visible answer, and it must reduce that variation to a coherent, accountable commitment. Mixing the jobs suppresses novelty; separating them without a transition produces workshops full of ideas but no decision. This archetype governs the whole repeating cycle: frame, expand, test breadth, gather discriminating evidence, narrow, commit proportionally, retain reserves, and reopen the right layer when feedback changes the case.\n\nThe underlying tension is not simply “more ideas versus fewer ideas.” Divergence requires permission to challenge defaults, vary dimensions, and withhold ordinary preference judgments. Convergence requires comparable evidence, constraint awareness, accountability, and a willingness to exclude. Without a governed transition, whichever mode has more status or urgency colonizes the other: critique strangles novelty, or novelty postpones responsibility.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A design process needs both variety and commitment, yet the norms that produce many meaningfully different options conflict with the criteria, comparison, and accountability needed to select and refine one. Without orchestration, evaluation begins too early, breadth becomes performative, or exploration continues without a defensible commitment."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires divergence to generate diverse options, including alternatives outside the initial frame.", "role_mapping": "Plausible paths -> divergent option set.", "slug": "divergence_convergence_in_the_design_process", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b023_a05_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when a design challenge admits several plausible frames, architectures, concepts, or implementation paths and an early choice would create costly path dependence. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The challenge admits multiple plausible frames, architectures, concepts, or implementation paths.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The challenge admits multiple plausible frames, architectures, concepts, or implementation paths.", "Use this archetype when a design challenge admits several plausible frames, architectures, concepts, or implementation paths and an early choice would create costly path dependence."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Divergence-Convergence in the Design Process", "one_liner": "Expand then refine ideas.", "page_ref": "prime:divergence_convergence_in_the_design_process", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Plausible paths -> divergent option set.", "slug": "divergence_convergence_in_the_design_process", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires divergence to generate diverse options, including alternatives outside the initial frame."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The challenge admits multiple plausible frames, architectures, concepts, or implementation paths.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P034-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve commitment rather than generic early activity.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A commitment is the focal action.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the counterfactual causal consequence, not merely a possibility of delay.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The commitment would create path dependence.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve premature ordering relative to representation without converting the counterfactual commitment into an actual event.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The contemplated commitment precedes completion of the relevant representation.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires an omitted important design or evaluation dimension at commitment time.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "At least one important dimension is not yet represented.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires an unrepresented stakeholder at commitment time.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "At least one stakeholder is not yet represented.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}], "predicate": "Early commitment would create path dependence before important dimensions or stakeholders are represented.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Commitment would create path dependence before an important dimension or stakeholder is represented.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P034-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The process may be used for novelty even when early commitment would remain reversible and representative.", "slug": "divergence_convergence_in_the_design_process"}], "residual_id": "r:divergence_convergence_cycle_orchestration:b023_a05_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b023_a05_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when a design challenge admits several plausible frames, architectures, concepts, or implementation paths and an early choice would create costly path dependence. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Early commitment would create path dependence before important dimensions or stakeholders are represented.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Early commitment would create path dependence before important dimensions or stakeholders are represented.", "Use this archetype when a design challenge admits several plausible frames, architectures, concepts, or implementation paths and an early choice would create costly path dependence."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The process may be used for novelty even when early commitment would remain reversible and representative.", "slug": "divergence_convergence_in_the_design_process"}], "normalized_requirement": "Early commitment would create path dependence before important dimensions or stakeholders are represented.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Early commitment would create path dependence before important dimensions or stakeholders are represented.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime explicitly separates divergence and convergence into phases with different cognitive modes and evaluation criteria.", "role_mapping": "Generation -> divergence; evaluation -> convergence; different norms -> phase-specific criteria.", "slug": "divergence_convergence_in_the_design_process", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b023_a05_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when generation and evaluation require different roles or norms, when prototypes can expose differences among options, and when later evidence may require a bounded return to exploration. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Generation and evaluation involve different roles, norms, information, or time horizons.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Generation and evaluation involve different roles, norms, information, or time horizons.", "It is especially useful when generation and evaluation require different roles or norms, when prototypes can expose differences among options, and when later evidence may require a bounded return to exploration."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Divergence-Convergence in the Design Process", "one_liner": "Expand then refine ideas.", "page_ref": "prime:divergence_convergence_in_the_design_process", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Generation -> divergence; evaluation -> convergence; different norms -> phase-specific criteria.", "slug": "divergence_convergence_in_the_design_process", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime explicitly separates divergence and convergence into phases with different cognitive modes and evaluation criteria."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Generation and evaluation involve different roles, norms, information, or time horizons.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The team must eventually select, combine, test, or sequence a bounded set of options.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The pattern earns its coordination cost when missing a materially different option is more consequential than running a bounded exploration phase. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: The team must eventually select, combine, test, or sequence a bounded set of options. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The team must eventually select, combine, test, or sequence a bounded set of options.", "The pattern earns its coordination cost when missing a materially different option is more consequential than running a bounded exploration phase."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "The team must eventually select, combine, test, or sequence a bounded set of options."}, {"display_text": "New evidence may require reopening either the problem frame or the solution space.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Convergence requires comparable evidence, constraint awareness, accountability, and a willingness to exclude. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: New evidence may require reopening either the problem frame or the solution space. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["New evidence may require reopening either the problem frame or the solution space.", "Convergence requires comparable evidence, constraint awareness, accountability, and a willingness to exclude."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "New evidence may require reopening either the problem frame or the solution space."}, {"display_text": "The cost of missing a materially different option exceeds the cost of a bounded exploration phase.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The pattern earns its coordination cost when missing a materially different option is more consequential than running a bounded exploration phase. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The cost of missing a materially different option exceeds the cost of a bounded exploration phase. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The cost of missing a materially different option exceeds the cost of a bounded exploration phase.", "The pattern earns its coordination cost when missing a materially different option is more consequential than running a bounded exploration phase."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The cost of missing a materially different option exceeds the cost of a bounded exploration phase."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 23, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-023", "ledger_sha256": "f372df8035c0a1bfd8349fb8198282398e86fa9e332ac226bf6eb4adb67551f4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Divergence Detection and Correction", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:divergence_detection_and_correction", "slug": "divergence_detection_and_correction"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is directional failure. A process intended to approach a target instead increases its distance from that target. The process may still be active, busy, and apparently managed, but the direction of movement is wrong.\n\nThis can happen because the target is ambiguous, the feedback signal is misleading, the update rule is miscalibrated, local incentives pull actors away from the global outcome, external conditions changed, or a previous correction created new error. The danger is not only that the process fails, but that each additional cycle can make recovery harder.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A process intended to approach a target, stable state, or agreement instead moves farther away over time."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's failure signature is proxy improvement while independent target measures stagnate or worsen, increasing the apparatus-target gap.", "role_mapping": "Intended target -> hard-to-observe target; increasing distance -> proxy-target decoupling.", "slug": "proxy_target_divergence", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b023_a06_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Distance from target is increasing. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Distance from target is increasing"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Proxy-Target Divergence", "one_liner": "An apparatus calibrated against a proxy keeps operating on it after the proxy-target relationship has silently decoupled.", "page_ref": "prime:proxy_target_divergence", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Intended target -> hard-to-observe target; increasing distance -> proxy-target decoupling.", "slug": "proxy_target_divergence", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's failure signature is proxy improvement while independent target measures stagnate or worsen, increasing the apparatus-target gap."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Distance from the intended target is increasing.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A proxy apparatus may simply continue unchanged rather than applying actions that are intended as corrections.", "slug": "proxy_target_divergence"}], "residual_id": "r:divergence_detection_and_correction:b023_a06_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b023_a06_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Corrections are no longer corrective. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Corrections are no longer corrective"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A proxy apparatus may simply continue unchanged rather than applying actions that are intended as corrections.", "slug": "proxy_target_divergence"}], "normalized_requirement": "Corrections are no longer corrective.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Corrections are no longer corrective.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a deployment distribution to move systematically away from the reference distribution over time.", "role_mapping": "Variation -> deployment distribution movement; directional drift -> growing reference gap.", "slug": "data_drift", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b023_a06_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The process needs enough freedom to explore, adapt, and tolerate noise, but enough discipline to detect when movement has become harmful divergence rather than useful variation. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Variation becomes directional drift.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Variation becomes directional drift", "The process needs enough freedom to explore, adapt, and tolerate noise, but enough discipline to detect when movement has become harmful divergence rather than useful variation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Data Drift", "one_liner": "A static learned mapping silently loses accuracy as the deployment distribution drifts away from the distribution it was calibrated on.", "page_ref": "prime:data_drift", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Variation -> deployment distribution movement; directional drift -> growing reference gap.", "slug": "data_drift", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a deployment distribution to move systematically away from the reference distribution over time."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Variation becomes directional drift.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P035-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a process with successive updates or stages and a focal error within that process.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An iterative process carries error or deviation.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve increasing accumulated deviation over successive iterations, not a constant or isolated error.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The error grows across successive iterations.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve compounding in which prior deviation carries forward or amplifies later deviation, rather than unrelated errors merely recurring.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Earlier error contributes to later error accumulation.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Compounding error appears.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Error in an iterative process compounds across successive iterations.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P035-C01-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Proxy-target decoupling can create a stable noncompounding offset; compounding is not mandatory.", "slug": "proxy_target_divergence"}], "residual_id": "r:divergence_detection_and_correction:b023_a06_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b023_a06_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Compounding error appears. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Compounding error appears"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Proxy-target decoupling can create a stable noncompounding offset; compounding is not mandatory.", "slug": "proxy_target_divergence"}], "normalized_requirement": "Compounding error appears.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Compounding error appears.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Stakeholders disagree about whether the path is still viable.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The process must have some reference target or expected path, and there must be enough observation to tell whether updates are moving closer or farther away. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Stakeholders disagree about whether the path is still viable. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders disagree about whether the path is still viable", "The process must have some reference target or expected path, and there must be enough observation to tell whether updates are moving closer or farther away."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Stakeholders disagree about whether the path is still viable"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 23, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-023", "ledger_sha256": "f372df8035c0a1bfd8349fb8198282398e86fa9e332ac226bf6eb4adb67551f4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Diverse Functional Redundancy", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:diverse_functional_redundancy", "slug": "diverse_functional_redundancy"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 2 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 2}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is false variety. The system appears to have options, but those options are not independent enough or equivalent enough to protect the function. Similar copies share the same hidden dependency. Different tools perform related but not equivalent work. Alternate channels exist but are not usable by the people who need them. Backups are listed but untested.\n\nThe root tension is between efficient standardization and resilient variety. Standardization makes systems cheaper, cleaner, and easier to govern. It also creates monocultures: one assumption, platform, source, or rule can propagate failure everywhere. Diverse Functional Redundancy deliberately pays some complexity cost to avoid all paths breaking in the same way.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A critical function depends on one pathway, or on multiple pathways that are so similar or tightly coupled that a single upstream dependency, design flaw, environmental condition, authority failure, or operating assumption can disable them together."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P035-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a function whose loss is consequential, not an arbitrary collection of components.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A focal function is critical.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve more than one pathway, mechanism, or component presented as supporting the same function.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Multiple pathways support the critical function.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve non-independent failure exposure across the pathways, not merely separate risks with no shared dependence.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The pathways' failure exposures are correlated.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve joint vulnerability to at least one common cause, dependency, flaw, condition, authority, or operating assumption.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A shared cause or condition can disable multiple pathways together.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "A critical function has correlated failure exposure.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Pathways supporting a critical function have correlated failure exposure.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P035-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact prime requires genuinely independent mechanisms and does not entail correlated failure exposure.", "slug": "functional_redundancy_degeneracy"}], "residual_id": "r:diverse_functional_redundancy:b023_a07_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b023_a07_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Critical function has correlated failure exposure. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Critical function has correlated failure exposure"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Holding the complete deposit_concentration_risk record and qualifier 'At least two depositors share the correlation-generating cause.' fixed, I varied optional manifestations and found no complete instance that falsifies the selected DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Deposit Concentration Risk", "one_liner": "Judge a bank's funding fragility by the correlation-adjusted effective depositor count rather than the headline number — coupled depositors collapse toward one bet, voiding the law-of-large-numbers smoothing a large base seems to guarantee.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:deposit_concentration_risk", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2"], "guard_type": "QUANTIFIER_BINDING", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "correlated_depositor_plurality", "predicate": "At least two depositors share the correlation-generating cause.", "rationale": "The candidate supplies the structural spine; any emitted qualifier is one anchored, atomic, non-restating fact sufficient for one complete DNF branch."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "deposit_concentration_risk"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "correlated_depositor_plurality"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "deposit_concentration_risk", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P035-C03-U1", "why_it_fits": "The correlated-depositor branch supplies critical funding, correlated exposure, and common-cause failure. The atomic plurality guard excludes the candidate's separate single-depositor concentration branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_GUARDED_EQUIVALENT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Holding the complete concentration_illusion record and qualifier 'The portfolio's diversification function is critical to the focal system.' fixed, I varied optional manifestations and found no complete instance that falsifies the selected DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Concentration Illusion", "one_liner": "The failure where a portfolio looks diversified across many labels but its holdings share a hidden common factor — so a single shock moves them together and realized risk tracks the rank of the factor-exposure matrix, not the count of positions.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:concentration_illusion", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "critical_portfolio_diversification_function", "predicate": "The portfolio's diversification function is critical to the focal system.", "rationale": "The candidate supplies the structural spine; any emitted qualifier is one anchored, atomic, non-restating fact sufficient for one complete DNF branch."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "concentration_illusion"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "critical_portfolio_diversification_function"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "concentration_illusion", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P035-C03-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record necessarily supplies multiple nominal paths, correlated exposures, and one shock moving them together. The sole remaining criticality fact is supplied by one atomic context guard."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A critical function has correlated failure exposure.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P035-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve redundancy created by copying the same or materially similar mechanism for one critical function.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A critical function is protected by simply duplicated pathways or mechanisms.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a specific relevant failure mode applied to the duplicated mechanisms, not generic dissatisfaction with redundancy.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A focal failure mode threatens the duplicated protection.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve failure of simple duplication to maintain the critical function under the focal mode, not merely reduced efficiency or uncertain protection.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The duplication is insufficient against that failure mode.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the duplication's shared vulnerability as why adding identical copies does not supply effective protection.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The failure mode can defeat the similar duplicates together.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Simple duplication is insufficient against the relevant failure mode.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Simple duplication does not protect the critical function against the relevant failure mode.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P035-C04-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Functionally redundant mechanisms can be introduced without any prior simple-duplication failure.", "slug": "functional_redundancy_degeneracy"}], "residual_id": "r:diverse_functional_redundancy:b023_a07_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b023_a07_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Simple duplication is insufficient. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Simple duplication is insufficient"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Functionally redundant mechanisms can be introduced without any prior simple-duplication failure.", "slug": "functional_redundancy_degeneracy"}], "normalized_requirement": "Simple duplication is insufficient against the relevant failure mode.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Simple duplication is insufficient against the relevant failure mode.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Different means can deliver acceptable functional equivalence.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: Different means can deliver acceptable functional equivalence. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Different means can deliver acceptable functional equivalence"]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Different means can deliver acceptable functional equivalence"}, {"display_text": "Continuity matters more than optimization through uniformity.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: Continuity matters more than optimization through uniformity. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Continuity matters more than optimization through uniformity"]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Continuity matters more than optimization through uniformity"}, {"display_text": "Common-mode risk can be named and tested.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: Common-mode risk can be named and tested. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Common-mode risk can be named and tested"]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Common-mode risk can be named and tested"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 23, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-023", "ledger_sha256": "f372df8035c0a1bfd8349fb8198282398e86fa9e332ac226bf6eb4adb67551f4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Domain–Codomain Delimitation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:domain_codomain_delimitation", "slug": "domain_codomain_delimitation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 5, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 3, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 4, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 4 of 5 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a mismatch between a function-like unit and the cases or promises attached to it. The unit may have a name, owner, interface, workflow, or policy label, but its valid operating set is not explicit. As a result, out-of-domain inputs enter ordinary processing and out-of-codomain outputs are produced, inferred, or promised.\n\nThis creates several recurring symptoms: users disagree about what belongs in scope; downstream systems assume unsupported outputs; exception handling happens late and informally; validation checks superficial shape but not real applicability; and scope changes accumulate without stewardship. The deeper tension is that the system needs enough boundary precision to preserve validity while retaining humane and adaptive handling for legitimate edge cases.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A function, policy, process, model, role, or service is applied to inputs it cannot validly handle, or is expected to produce outputs outside its intended range, because the input domain and output codomain are implicit, disputed, or stale."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P035-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an input-handling entity with a bounded set or regime of inputs it can validly handle.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A focal system, function, policy, process, model, role, or service has a valid input domain.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve actual non-membership of the input in the entity's valid operating domain.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A focal input lies outside that valid domain.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve actual acceptance or processing despite invalidity, not correct rejection or merely possible misuse.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The entity nevertheless accepts or applies itself to the invalid input.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Invalid inputs are accepted.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A system accepts an input outside its valid domain.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P035-C05-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A function can have an explicit domain and reject every invalid input.", "slug": "function_mapping"}], "residual_id": "r:domain_codomain_delimitation:b023_a08_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b023_a08_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Invalid input acceptance. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["invalid_input_acceptance"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Holding the complete null_dereference record fixed, I varied optional manifestations and found no complete instance that falsifies the selected DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Null dereference", "one_liner": "The failure where code operates on a reference under the unstated assumption that the object exists, while the reference is in fact absent — so the defect is the missing existence-precondition check, not the absence itself.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:null_dereference", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "null_dereference"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "null_dereference", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P035-C05-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every complete null-dereference instance includes an existence-bounded valid domain, an absent reference outside it, and an attempted operation that accepts or processes the invalid value."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Invalid inputs are accepted.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P035-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an output-producing entity with a bounded supported or intended range of outputs.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A focal system or function has a supported output codomain.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an output expectation that is not contained in the entity's supported output range.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The focal expected output lies outside that codomain.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an actual expectation or demand for production, not merely the abstract possibility of an out-of-range output.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The entity is expected to produce that unsupported output.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "Outputs outside the supported codomain are expected.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A system is expected to produce an output outside its supported codomain.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P035-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Surjectivity requires every declared codomain element to have a preimage and does not entail expectations outside the codomain.", "slug": "surjectivity"}], "residual_id": "r:domain_codomain_delimitation:b023_a08_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b023_a08_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Unsupported output expectation. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["unsupported_output_expectation"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Surjectivity requires every declared codomain element to have a preimage and does not entail expectations outside the codomain.", "slug": "surjectivity"}], "normalized_requirement": "Outputs outside the supported codomain are expected.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Outputs outside the supported codomain are expected.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires an initially bounded project or activity whose scope expands through uncontrolled additions beyond the original boundary.", "role_mapping": "Original domain -> bounded scope; creep -> uncontrolled expansion.", "slug": "scope_creep", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b023_a08_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Scope creep. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["scope_creep"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Scope Creep", "one_liner": "A perimeter ratchets outward through small additions each judged against a drifting current baseline rather than the original charter, with no owner of the trajectory.", "page_ref": "prime:scope_creep", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Original domain -> bounded scope; creep -> uncontrolled expansion.", "slug": "scope_creep", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires an initially bounded project or activity whose scope expands through uncontrolled additions beyond the original boundary."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Scope creeps beyond the originally bounded domain.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P035-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a function or model and a bounded context, population, input range, or regime supporting its validity.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A focal function or model has an operating regime in which it is valid.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve prior validity, not a function or model that was invalid from the outset.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The function or model was valid in an earlier operating regime.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve boundary-crossing applicability extension without requiring the operating context itself to change.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The function or model's application or claimed applicability extends beyond the valid regime.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve application or claimed applicability beyond the valid boundary rather than applicability ending at that boundary.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The function or model is applied or claimed applicable outside the regime where it is valid.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Applicability drifts beyond the regime where the function or model was valid.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A function or model's application or claimed applicability extends beyond the regime where it is valid.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P035-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Applicability scope can remain explicit and stable; the concept does not entail drift beyond it.", "slug": "applicability_scope"}], "residual_id": "r:domain_codomain_delimitation:b023_a08_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b023_a08_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Applicability drift. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["applicability_drift"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Holding the complete ground_truth_drift record and qualifier 'The monitored model was valid under the original label definition.' fixed, I varied optional manifestations and found no complete instance that falsifies the selected DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Ground-Truth Drift", "one_liner": "The model-evaluation failure in which the operational definition of the correct answer drifts on a clock the monitoring apparatus cannot see, so metrics keep scoring against a moved target while the dashboards stay green — invisible because every detector consumes current ground truth as its reference.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:ground_truth_drift", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1", "O2"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "model_valid_under_original_label_definition", "predicate": "The monitored model was valid under the original label definition.", "rationale": "The candidate supplies the structural spine; any emitted qualifier is one anchored, atomic, non-restating fact sufficient for one complete DNF branch."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "ground_truth_drift"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "model_valid_under_original_label_definition"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "ground_truth_drift", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P035-C07-U1", "why_it_fits": "The record supplies drift and continued application outside the original label regime. One atomic historical-validity guard supplies the otherwise non-necessary earlier-validity premise."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Holding the complete gold_standard_erosion record and qualifier 'The evaluated model was valid under the original reference standard.' fixed, I varied optional manifestations and found no complete instance that falsifies the selected DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Gold-Standard Erosion", "one_liner": "Recognize that a model scored against a mutable reference label can show stable metrics while its real validity silently degrades, because the answer key — not the model — has drifted away from the construct it once operationalized.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:gold_standard_erosion", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1", "O2"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "model_valid_under_original_reference_standard", "predicate": "The evaluated model was valid under the original reference standard.", "rationale": "The candidate supplies the structural spine; any emitted qualifier is one anchored, atomic, non-restating fact sufficient for one complete DNF branch."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "gold_standard_erosion"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "model_valid_under_original_reference_standard"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "gold_standard_erosion", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P035-C07-U1", "why_it_fits": "Reference drift and continued evaluation are exact-record commitments. The original-validity guard is one atomic historical fact and supplies the only remaining necessity gap."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Holding the complete covariate_shift_blind_spot record fixed, I varied optional manifestations and found no complete instance that falsifies the selected DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Covariate-Shift Blind Spot", "one_liner": "The deployment failure in which a model's input distribution P(X) drifts outside its training support while P(Y|X) holds — and goes undetected because monitoring watches lagging outcome metrics instead of the immediately-available input signal.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:covariate_shift_blind_spot", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "covariate_shift_blind_spot"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "covariate_shift_blind_spot", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P035-C07-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every complete covariate-shift-blind-spot instance places a formerly supported model into deployment inputs outside training support while its evaluation regime continues to treat it as applicable."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Applicability drifts beyond the regime where the function or model was valid.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B5", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P035-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an entity with a bounded domain or regime of valid application.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A focal system, function, policy, process, model, role, or service has an applicability domain.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve boundary cases specifically, not arbitrary interior or clearly exterior cases.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Focal cases occur at the boundary of that domain.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve absence of a defined behavior or outcome at the boundary, not merely poor performance under a specified rule.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The entity's behavior for those boundary cases is undefined.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Behavior at the domain boundary is undefined.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A system's behavior is undefined for cases at its applicability-domain boundary.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P035-C08-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A function mapping can be total on its declared domain with fully specified boundary behavior.", "slug": "function_mapping"}], "residual_id": "r:domain_codomain_delimitation:b023_a08_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b023_a08_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Undefined boundary behavior. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["undefined_boundary_behavior"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Holding the complete rules_of_engagement_ambiguity record and qualifier 'The undecidable choice point lies at the rule's applicability-domain boundary.' fixed, I varied optional manifestations and found no complete instance that falsifies the selected DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Rules-of-Engagement Ambiguity", "one_liner": "Diagnose frontline breakdown under time pressure as a grain mismatch — decision rules written coarser than the environment generates choice points — paid out of a finite discretion budget, relocating the fix from the operator's judgment to the rule, escalation path, and pre-positioned authority.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:rules_of_engagement_ambiguity", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "choice_point_at_rule_boundary", "predicate": "The undecidable choice point lies at the rule's applicability-domain boundary.", "rationale": "The candidate supplies the structural spine; any emitted qualifier is one anchored, atomic, non-restating fact sufficient for one complete DNF branch."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "rules_of_engagement_ambiguity"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "choice_point_at_rule_boundary"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "rules_of_engagement_ambiguity", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P035-C08-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record supplies the rule domain and undefined action. The single location guard is atomic and makes the undefined case a boundary case rather than an arbitrary interior omission."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Behavior at the domain boundary is undefined.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 5", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "DISJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 23, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-023", "ledger_sha256": "f372df8035c0a1bfd8349fb8198282398e86fa9e332ac226bf6eb4adb67551f4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Domain-Specificity of Confidence", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:domain_specificity_of_confidence", "slug": "domain_specificity_of_confidence"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 4 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Actors often generalize confidence from a known domain to adjacent, prestige-linked, or superficially similar domains without enough warrant, creating overconfident claims, fragile decisions, and false authority. The system lacks a clear boundary between warranted confidence and speculative extrapolation.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Actors often generalize confidence from a known domain to adjacent, prestige-linked, or superficially similar domains without enough warrant, creating overconfident claims, fragile decisions, and false authority. The system lacks a clear boundary between warranted confidence and speculative extrapolation."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P035-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the same actor as bearer of source-domain standing and as the requested judge.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A focal actor carries standing associated with a source domain.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a source-to-target domain change, not judgment confined to the domain in which standing was earned.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The requested judgment concerns a domain different from the source domain.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an actual request or reliance for judgment in the target domain, not merely possession of broad interests.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The actor is asked or relied upon to judge the target domain.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve genuine source-domain expertise as the standing carried into the target judgment.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The actor has real expertise in the source domain.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve prior source-domain success as the standing carried into the target judgment.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The actor has success in the source domain.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve source-domain status as the standing carried into the target judgment.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The actor has status in the source domain.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve an established source-domain track record as the standing carried into the target judgment.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The actor has a track record in the source domain.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "An actor with expertise, success, status, or track record in one domain is asked to judge another.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An actor carrying one listed source-domain credential is asked to judge a different domain.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P035-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Transfer can apply a learned skill without status, expertise claims, or a request to judge another domain.", "slug": "transfer_of_learning"}], "residual_id": "r:domain_specificity_of_confidence:b023_a09_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b023_a09_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: An actor has real expertise, success, status, or track record in one domain and is asked to judge another domain. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["An actor has real expertise, success, status, or track record in one domain and is asked to judge another domain."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_GUARDED_EQUIVALENT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Holding the complete authority_bias record and qualifier 'The authority's operative status was earned in a domain different from the claim domain.' fixed, I varied optional manifestations and found no complete instance that falsifies the selected DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Authority Bias", "one_liner": "Decompose any act of deference into a content term and a source-cue term, and flag the upward tilt as bias whenever authority signals — titles, uniforms, confident bearing — inflate credence beyond the authority's genuine expertise in the specific claim.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:authority_bias", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "authority_status_from_different_domain", "predicate": "The authority's operative status was earned in a domain different from the claim domain.", "rationale": "The candidate supplies the structural spine; any emitted qualifier is one anchored, atomic, non-restating fact sufficient for one complete DNF branch."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "authority_bias"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "authority_status_from_different_domain"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "authority_bias", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P035-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "Authority bias contains a named out-of-field calibration branch. The atomic branch selector binds the status source domain to a distinct target claim domain without adding the deference event."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_GUARDED_EQUIVALENT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Holding the complete ad_verecundiam record and qualifier 'The cited credential's source domain is distinct from the target claim's domain.' fixed, I varied optional manifestations and found no complete instance that falsifies the selected DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Ad Verecundiam (Appeal to Authority)", "one_liner": "The informal fallacy of treating a claim as established by an authority's credential under conditions where the citation carries no evidential weight — the credential being a signal that load-bearing conditions (domain competence, evidence access, disinterest, convergence) hold, used as though it guaranteed what it only heuristically suggests.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:ad_verecundiam", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "credential_cross_domain", "predicate": "The cited credential's source domain is distinct from the target claim's domain.", "rationale": "The candidate supplies the structural spine; any emitted qualifier is one anchored, atomic, non-restating fact sufficient for one complete DNF branch."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "ad_verecundiam"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "credential_cross_domain"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "ad_verecundiam", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P035-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record names domain competence as a load-bearing credential condition. One cross-domain guard selects that branch and supplies the only missing source-target difference."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "An actor with expertise, success, status, or track record in one domain is asked to judge another.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P035-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a specific source domain as the basis on which the focal confidence was earned.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Confidence was earned in a source domain.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a target setting tied to the same confidence claim, not an unrelated comparison.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A focal target is evaluated relative to that source domain.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a real source-target mismatch rather than mere uncertainty about similarity.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The target actually differs from the source domain.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve context as the dimension on which the target differs from the confidence-earning source.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The target context differs from the source context.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve population as the dimension on which the target differs from the confidence-earning source.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The target population differs from the source population.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve market as the dimension on which the target differs from the confidence-earning source.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The target market differs from the source market.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve data distribution as the dimension on which the target differs from the confidence-earning source.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The target data distribution differs from the source data distribution.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve problem frame as the dimension on which the target differs from the confidence-earning source.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The target problem frame differs from the source problem frame.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "The target context, population, market, distribution, or frame differs from the domain where confidence was earned.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A target differs from the confidence-earning source domain along one listed dimension.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P035-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The transfer target can differ only in task demand or another dimension outside the listed context set.", "slug": "transfer_of_learning"}], "residual_id": "r:domain_specificity_of_confidence:b023_a09_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b023_a09_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A new context, population, market, data distribution, or problem frame differs from the domain in which confidence was earned. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A new context, population, market, data distribution, or problem frame differs from the domain in which confidence was earned."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The transfer target can differ only in task demand or another dimension outside the listed context set.", "slug": "transfer_of_learning"}], "normalized_requirement": "The target context, population, market, distribution, or frame differs from the domain where confidence was earned.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The target context, population, market, distribution, or frame differs from the domain where confidence was earned.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P035-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the same actor as bearer of the selected experience and speaker of the certainty claim.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A focal actor possesses the selected experience.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an actual upward mismatch between expressed confidence and evidential support, not confidence that remains calibrated.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The actor's expressed certainty exceeds the certainty warranted by the evidence.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the selected experience as a cause or pressure producing the overstatement, not a coincidental background trait.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The selected experience pressures the actor toward the excess certainty.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve prior success as what pressures the actor to express evidence-exceeding certainty.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Past success is the pressure source.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve fluency as what pressures the actor to express evidence-exceeding certainty.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Fluency is the pressure source.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Past success or fluency pressures an actor to speak with more certainty than evidence supports.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "One listed experience pressures an actor to express more certainty than the evidence supports.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P035-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Processing ease can influence liking or perceived quality without producing speech or certainty that exceeds evidence.", "slug": "processing_fluency"}], "residual_id": "r:domain_specificity_of_confidence:b023_a09_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b023_a09_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Past success or fluency creates pressure to speak with more certainty than the evidence supports. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Past success or fluency creates pressure to speak with more certainty than the evidence supports."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Processing ease can influence liking or perceived quality without producing speech or certainty that exceeds evidence.", "slug": "processing_fluency"}], "normalized_requirement": "Past success or fluency pressures an actor to speak with more certainty than evidence supports.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Past success or fluency pressures an actor to speak with more certainty than evidence supports.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The actor actually generalizes source-domain confidence into an unwarranted target-domain claim or decision.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The actor actually generalizes source-domain confidence into an unwarranted target-domain claim or decision.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A decision requires distinguishing core competence from adjacent speculation, especially when the audience may defer to status.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Actors often generalize confidence from a known domain to adjacent, prestige-linked, or superficially similar domains without enough warrant, creating overconfident claims, fragile decisions, and false authority. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: A decision requires distinguishing core competence from adjacent speculation, especially when the audience may defer to status. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A decision requires distinguishing core competence from adjacent speculation, especially when the audience may defer to status.", "Actors often generalize confidence from a known domain to adjacent, prestige-linked, or superficially similar domains without enough warrant, creating overconfident claims, fragile decisions, and false authority."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "A decision requires distinguishing core competence from adjacent speculation, especially when the audience may defer to status."}, {"display_text": "The cost of misplaced confidence is high enough that generic disclaimers are insufficient.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Confidence must be high enough to enable decisive action where warrant is strong, yet low enough to prevent expertise, status, or fluency from being exported into domains where the actor is still ignorant. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The cost of misplaced confidence is high enough that generic disclaimers are insufficient. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The cost of misplaced confidence is high enough that generic disclaimers are insufficient.", "Confidence must be high enough to enable decisive action where warrant is strong, yet low enough to prevent expertise, status, or fluency from being exported into domains where the actor is still ignorant."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The cost of misplaced confidence is high enough that generic disclaimers are insufficient."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 23, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-023", "ledger_sha256": "f372df8035c0a1bfd8349fb8198282398e86fa9e332ac226bf6eb4adb67551f4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Dominant-Term Regime Modeling", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:dominant_term_regime_modeling", "slug": "dominant_term_regime_modeling"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 2, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 2 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A decision, comparison, forecast, or model is being evaluated at a scale where exact details, local constants, or short-run corrections consume attention even though the eventual behavior is governed by a smaller set of dominant terms. Without an explicit asymptotic frame, people may overfit finite observations, compare alternatives using irrelevant constants, miss scaling breakpoints, escalate along a path that will be dominated by hidden costs, or discard a small term that later becomes dominant in the regime that matters.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A decision, comparison, forecast, or model is being evaluated at a scale where exact details, local constants, or short-run corrections consume attention even though the eventual behavior is governed by a smaller set of dominant terms. Without an explicit asymptotic frame, people may overfit finite observations, compare alternatives using irrelevant constants, miss scaling breakpoints, escalate along a path that will be dominated by hidden costs, or discard a small term that later becomes dominant in the regime that matters."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime concerns the limiting or dominant behavior of a quantity as its argument grows, shrinks, iterates, or approaches a boundary.", "role_mapping": "Relevant variable -> asymptotic argument; long-run regime -> limit regime.", "slug": "asymptotic_behavior", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b023_a10_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The relevant variable can grow, shrink, iterate, compound, approach a boundary, or move into a long-run regime. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The relevant variable can grow, shrink, iterate, compound, approach a boundary, or move into a long-run regime."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Asymptotic Behavior", "one_liner": "In the limit, only the dominant term matters, so behavior is classified by growth class rather than exact value and small or fast-decaying contributions are discarded.", "page_ref": "prime:asymptotic_behavior", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Relevant variable -> asymptotic argument; long-run regime -> limit regime.", "slug": "asymptotic_behavior", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime concerns the limiting or dominant behavior of a quantity as its argument grows, shrinks, iterates, or approaches a boundary."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The relevant variable grows, shrinks, iterates, compounds, approaches a boundary, or enters a long-run regime.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Asymptotic behavior can concern one function or one sequence and need not decompose an outcome into multiple contributors.", "slug": "asymptotic_behavior"}], "residual_id": "r:dominant_term_regime_modeling:b023_a10_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b023_a10_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Multiple contributors affect the outcome but plausibly grow, decay, or compound at different rates. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Multiple contributors affect the outcome but plausibly grow, decay, or compound at different rates."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Asymptotic behavior can concern one function or one sequence and need not decompose an outcome into multiple contributors.", "slug": "asymptotic_behavior"}], "normalized_requirement": "Multiple contributors affect the outcome and grow, decay, or compound at different rates.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Multiple contributors affect the outcome and grow, decay, or compound at different rates.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P035-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O4", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O4", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O4", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve expected behavior in the selected nonlocal regime tied to the same focal system or phenomenon as the local comparator.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Expected behavior is specified for the same focal phenomenon in a selected nonlocal regime.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an actual incompatibility or contrary indication between the selected local comparator and expected nonlocal behavior, not mere regime difference or uncertainty.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The selected local comparator conflicts with the expected nonlocal behavior.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve an observed local measurement as the comparator.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The local comparator is a measurement.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve a local benchmark as the comparator rather than substituting a measurement-only requirement.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The local comparator is a benchmark.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve larger scale as the regime in which expected behavior conflicts with the selected local comparator.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The expected behavior concerns a larger-scale regime.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve longer time as the regime in which expected behavior conflicts with the selected local comparator.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The expected behavior concerns a longer-time regime.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve heavier load as the regime in which expected behavior conflicts with the selected local comparator.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The expected behavior concerns a heavier-load regime.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve rarer events as the regime in which expected behavior conflicts with the selected local comparator.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The expected behavior concerns a rarer-event regime.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A local measurement or benchmark conflicts with expected behavior at larger scale, longer time, heavier load, or rarer events.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A local measurement or benchmark conflicts with expected behavior in one listed nonlocal regime.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P035-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Local and asymptotic behavior can agree; the prime does not require an observed benchmark conflict.", "slug": "asymptotic_behavior"}], "residual_id": "r:dominant_term_regime_modeling:b023_a10_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b023_a10_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A local measurement or benchmark conflicts with the expected behavior at larger scale, longer time, heavier load, or rarer events. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A local measurement or benchmark conflicts with the expected behavior at larger scale, longer time, heavier load, or rarer events."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Local and asymptotic behavior can agree; the prime does not require an observed benchmark conflict.", "slug": "asymptotic_behavior"}], "normalized_requirement": "A local measurement conflicts with expected behavior at larger scale, longer time, heavier load, or rarer events.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A local measurement conflicts with expected behavior at larger scale, longer time, heavier load, or rarer events.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P035-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a comparison with a result or ordering that can depend on the treatment of terms.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A focal comparison evaluates alternatives, forecasts, decisions, or models.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the finite scale, time, load, or event regime relevant to the actual decision.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The comparison is evaluated within a bounded decision horizon.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve constants or lower-order contributions whose finite-horizon relevance is under evaluation, not only dominant asymptotic terms.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Constants and lower-order terms contribute within that horizon.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a consequential dependence of the comparison outcome on retaining or discounting those terms, not merely their presence.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Treating those terms as material or immaterial determines the comparison's result.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "A comparison hinges on whether constants and lower-order terms matter within the decision horizon.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Within a decision horizon, a comparison's result depends on whether constants and lower-order terms are treated as consequential.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P035-C13-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A limiting behavior can be characterized without a consequential comparison or disputed finite-horizon lower-order terms.", "slug": "asymptotic_behavior"}], "residual_id": "r:dominant_term_regime_modeling:b023_a10_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b023_a10_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A comparison hinges on whether constants and lower-order terms should matter for the decision horizon. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A comparison hinges on whether constants and lower-order terms should matter for the decision horizon."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_SYNTHESIS", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Holding the complete big_o_notation record and qualifier 'Within the bounded operating range used by the decision, retained constant factors reverse the asymptotic ranking.' fixed, I varied optional manifestations and found no complete instance that falsifies the selected DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Big O Notation", "one_liner": "Classify a function by its order of growth — discarding constant factors and small-input detail — so algorithms can be compared by how they scale rather than how fast they run on one machine.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:big_o_notation", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2", "O4"], "guard_type": "THRESHOLD_CROSSING", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "bounded_range_constants_reverse_asymptotic_ranking", "predicate": "Within the bounded operating range used by the decision, retained constant factors reverse the asymptotic ranking.", "rationale": "The candidate supplies the structural spine; any emitted qualifier is one anchored, atomic, non-restating fact sufficient for one complete DNF branch."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "big_o_notation"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "bounded_range_constants_reverse_asymptotic_ranking"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "big_o_notation", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P035-C13-U1", "why_it_fits": "Big O supplies the comparison and discarded finite-regime terms. One candidate-anchored crossover fact adds the bounded horizon and consequential ranking dependence without introducing another principal role."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A comparison hinges on whether constants and lower-order terms matter within the decision horizon.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a fitted relation to be projected outside the support of observed data, where error becomes structurally underdetermined.", "role_mapping": "Model or policy -> fitted relation; beyond sampled regime -> outside observed support.", "slug": "extrapolation_beyond_sampled_regime", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b023_a10_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A model or policy is being extrapolated beyond the sampled regime and needs explicit validity boundaries. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A model or policy is being extrapolated beyond the sampled regime and needs explicit validity boundaries."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Extrapolation Beyond Sampled Regime", "one_liner": "A calibrated apparatus is deployed against inputs outside the regime its calibration was established in, while continuing to report the same confidence indicators it would report inside the regime, so its own self-reporting is structurally blind to the regime exit.", "page_ref": "prime:extrapolation_beyond_sampled_regime", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Model or policy -> fitted relation; beyond sampled regime -> outside observed support.", "slug": "extrapolation_beyond_sampled_regime", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a fitted relation to be projected outside the support of observed data, where error becomes structurally underdetermined."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A model or policy is extrapolated beyond the sampled regime and needs explicit validity boundaries.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Exact computation, full simulation, or exhaustive detail is costly relative to the decision being made.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A decision, comparison, forecast, or model is being evaluated at a scale where exact details, local constants, or short-run corrections consume attention even though the eventual behavior is governed by a smaller set of dominant terms. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Exact computation, full simulation, or exhaustive detail is costly relative to the decision being made. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Exact computation, full simulation, or exhaustive detail is costly relative to the decision being made.", "A decision, comparison, forecast, or model is being evaluated at a scale where exact details, local constants, or short-run corrections consume attention even though the eventual behavior is governed by a smaller set of dominant terms."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Exact computation, full simulation, or exhaustive detail is costly relative to the decision being made."}, {"display_text": "Capacity, resource, complexity, risk, or performance planning requires knowing what will dominate as scale changes.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: Capacity, resource, complexity, risk, or performance planning requires knowing what will dominate as scale changes. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Capacity, resource, complexity, risk, or performance planning requires knowing what will dominate as scale changes."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Capacity, resource, complexity, risk, or performance planning requires knowing what will dominate as scale changes."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 23, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-023", "ledger_sha256": "f372df8035c0a1bfd8349fb8198282398e86fa9e332ac226bf6eb4adb67551f4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Donor-Coupled Capacity Governance", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:donor_coupled_capacity_governance", "slug": "donor_coupled_capacity_governance"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A recipient unit appears self-sustaining, profitable, resilient, populated, or operationally capable because a donor/source unit provides a sustained cross-boundary flow. The support may be valuable or necessary, but when it is hidden or unmanaged it creates false autonomy, donor fragility, unfair accountability, moral hazard, and withdrawal rebound.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A recipient unit appears self-sustaining, profitable, resilient, populated, or operationally capable because a donor/source unit provides a sustained cross-boundary flow. The support may be valuable or necessary, but when it is hidden or unmanaged it creates false autonomy, donor fragility, unfair accountability, moral hazard, and withdrawal rebound."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a sustained directional donor-to-recipient flow across a system boundary.", "role_mapping": "Listed flow -> transferred donor surplus; dominant direction -> asymmetric persistent flow.", "slug": "cross_boundary_subsidy", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b023_a11_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A resource, service, subsidy, labor stream, migration flow, legitimacy transfer, data feed, infrastructure service, or protective buffer crosses a boundary in one dominant direction. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A resource, service, subsidy, labor stream, migration flow, legitimacy transfer, data feed, infrastructure service, or protective buffer crosses a boundary in one dominant direction."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Cross-Boundary Subsidy", "one_liner": "An asymmetric, sustained flow of a sustaining resource across a boundary holds a recipient above its endogenous capacity, creating donor-coupling vulnerability mistaken for autonomy.", "page_ref": "prime:cross_boundary_subsidy", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Listed flow -> transferred donor surplus; dominant direction -> asymmetric persistent flow.", "slug": "cross_boundary_subsidy", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a sustained directional donor-to-recipient flow across a system boundary."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A resource, service, subsidy, labor, migration, legitimacy, data, infrastructure, or protective flow crosses a boundary in one dominant direction.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires recipient abundance or function to be held above in-system carrying capacity by the donor flow.", "role_mapping": "Withdrawal -> donor-flow reduction; recipient decline -> coupling vulnerability.", "slug": "cross_boundary_subsidy", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b023_a11_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The recipient would fall below its current level of function, population, service, or viability if the donor flow stopped or shrank. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The recipient would fall below its current level of function, population, service, or viability if the donor flow stopped or shrank."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Cross-Boundary Subsidy", "one_liner": "An asymmetric, sustained flow of a sustaining resource across a boundary holds a recipient above its endogenous capacity, creating donor-coupling vulnerability mistaken for autonomy.", "page_ref": "prime:cross_boundary_subsidy", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Withdrawal -> donor-flow reduction; recipient decline -> coupling vulnerability.", "slug": "cross_boundary_subsidy", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires recipient abundance or function to be held above in-system carrying capacity by the donor flow."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The recipient would fall below current function, population, service, or viability if the donor flow shrank.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P035-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a recipient whose apparent capacity is supported by an external donor or source.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A recipient receives external support from a donor or source unit.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an actual representation of self-sufficiency or independence, not merely incomplete operational detail.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "An institutional representation treats that recipient as autonomous.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the contradiction between represented autonomy and actual external dependence.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The autonomy representation persists despite the recipient's external support.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve reports as what represents the externally supported recipient as autonomous.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Reports are the representation channel.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve metrics as what represents the externally supported recipient as autonomous.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Metrics are the representation channel.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve governance rights as what treats the externally supported recipient as autonomous.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "Governance rights are the representation channel.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve strategy discussions as what treats the externally supported recipient as autonomous.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "Strategy discussions are the representation channel.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Reports, metrics, governance, or strategy treat the recipient as autonomous despite external support.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "One listed institutional representation treats an externally supported recipient as autonomous.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P035-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The recipient can visibly acknowledge and report its donor dependence even while the subsidy structurally shapes it.", "slug": "cross_boundary_subsidy"}], "residual_id": "r:donor_coupled_capacity_governance:b023_a11_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b023_a11_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Reports, metrics, governance rights, or strategy discussions treat the recipient as autonomous despite external support. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Reports, metrics, governance rights, or strategy discussions treat the recipient as autonomous despite external support."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The recipient can visibly acknowledge and report its donor dependence even while the subsidy structurally shapes it.", "slug": "cross_boundary_subsidy"}], "normalized_requirement": "Reports, metrics, governance, or strategy treat the recipient as autonomous despite external support.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Reports, metrics, governance, or strategy treat the recipient as autonomous despite external support.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P035-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve distinct donor and recipient roles connected by support or cross-boundary contribution.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A donor or source unit supports a distinct recipient unit.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the recipient support as the source of the donor burden, not an unrelated donor cost or risk.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The donor bears a burden because it supports the recipient.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a consequential burden rather than a negligible transfer cost or de minimis exposure.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The donor burden is material.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve metric invisibility at the recipient, not merely separate reporting that clearly attributes the donor burden.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Recipient performance measures do not expose the donor burden.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve a material cost borne by the donor because it supports the recipient.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The donor burden is a cost.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve a material risk borne by the donor because it supports the recipient.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The donor burden is a risk.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve material depletion of donor capacity or resources because it supports the recipient.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The donor burden is depletion.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve a material opportunity loss borne by the donor because it supports the recipient.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The donor burden is an opportunity loss.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "The donor bears material cost, risk, depletion, or opportunity loss hidden from recipient metrics.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A donor bears one listed material burden from supporting a recipient, and recipient performance measures omit that burden.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P035-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A donor may transfer surplus at negligible cost; material donor loss and metric invisibility are not mandatory.", "slug": "cross_boundary_subsidy"}], "residual_id": "r:donor_coupled_capacity_governance:b023_a11_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b023_a11_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The donor bears real cost, risk, depletion, or opportunity loss that is not visible in recipient performance measures. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The donor bears real cost, risk, depletion, or opportunity loss that is not visible in recipient performance measures."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A donor may transfer surplus at negligible cost; material donor loss and metric invisibility are not mandatory.", "slug": "cross_boundary_subsidy"}], "normalized_requirement": "The donor bears material cost, risk, depletion, or opportunity loss hidden from recipient metrics.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The donor bears material cost, risk, depletion, or opportunity loss hidden from recipient metrics.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires coupling vulnerability in which donor disturbance propagates after a lag because the recipient adapted around the inflow.", "role_mapping": "Withdrawal/shock -> donor disturbance; rebound failure -> recipient coupling vulnerability.", "slug": "cross_boundary_subsidy", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b023_a11_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Withdrawal, tapering, donor shock, or donor fatigue would produce rebound failure or cascading harm. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Withdrawal, tapering, donor shock, or donor fatigue would produce rebound failure or cascading harm."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Cross-Boundary Subsidy", "one_liner": "An asymmetric, sustained flow of a sustaining resource across a boundary holds a recipient above its endogenous capacity, creating donor-coupling vulnerability mistaken for autonomy.", "page_ref": "prime:cross_boundary_subsidy", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Withdrawal/shock -> donor disturbance; rebound failure -> recipient coupling vulnerability.", "slug": "cross_boundary_subsidy", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires coupling vulnerability in which donor disturbance propagates after a lag because the recipient adapted around the inflow."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Withdrawal, tapering, donor shock, or fatigue would produce rebound failure or cascading harm.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The flow may be normatively justified, but its duration, terms, accountability, and exit conditions are unclear.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The flow may be normatively justified, but its duration, terms, accountability, and exit conditions are unclear. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The flow may be normatively justified, but its duration, terms, accountability, and exit conditions are unclear."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The flow may be normatively justified, but its duration, terms, accountability, and exit conditions are unclear."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 23, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-023", "ledger_sha256": "f372df8035c0a1bfd8349fb8198282398e86fa9e332ac226bf6eb4adb67551f4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Dose–Exposure–Response Trajectory Modeling", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:dose_exposure_response_trajectory_modeling", "slug": "dose_exposure_response_trajectory_modeling"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A decision maker controls an input but cares about a delayed, mediated, and often nonlinear response. Directly equating input with effect hides transport, accumulation, clearance, receptor or channel saturation, lag, and heterogeneity, so escalation, repetition, or withdrawal can overshoot, undershoot, or arrive at the wrong time.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A decision maker controls an input but cares about a delayed, mediated, and often nonlinear response. Directly equating input with effect hides transport, accumulation, clearance, receptor or channel saturation, lag, and heterogeneity, so escalation, repetition, or withdrawal can overshoot, undershoot, or arrive at the wrong time."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires effect to depend on an internal concentration or effect-site state rather than directly on administered dose.", "role_mapping": "Internal state -> concentration C(t); observable response -> effect E(t).", "slug": "pk_pd_modeling_pharmacokinetics_pharmacodynamics", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b023_a12_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The observable response depends on an unobserved or indirectly measured internal state. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The observable response depends on an unobserved or indirectly measured internal state."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "PK/PD Modeling (Pharmacokinetics / Pharmacodynamics)", "one_liner": "Predict dynamic system behavior.", "page_ref": "prime:pk_pd_modeling_pharmacokinetics_pharmacodynamics", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Internal state -> concentration C(t); observable response -> effect E(t).", "slug": "pk_pd_modeling_pharmacokinetics_pharmacodynamics", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires effect to depend on an internal concentration or effect-site state rather than directly on administered dose."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Observable response depends on an unobserved or indirectly measured internal state.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires an irreducible interval between input stimulus and observable response, satisfying the lag disjunct.", "role_mapping": "Input -> stimulus; effect lag -> transit interval.", "slug": "latency", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b023_a12_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Directly equating input with effect hides transport, accumulation, clearance, receptor or channel saturation, lag, and heterogeneity, so escalation, repetition, or withdrawal can overshoot, undershoot, or arrive at the wrong time. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Input timing matters because effects lag, accumulate, decay, or persist after input stops.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Input timing matters because effects lag, accumulate, decay, or persist after input stops.", "Directly equating input with effect hides transport, accumulation, clearance, receptor or channel saturation, lag, and heterogeneity, so escalation, repetition, or withdrawal can overshoot, undershoot, or arrive at the wrong time."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Latency", "one_liner": "The irreducible delay between an input and the system's response.", "page_ref": "prime:latency", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Input -> stimulus; effect lag -> transit interval.", "slug": "latency", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires an irreducible interval between input stimulus and observable response, satisfying the lag disjunct."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Input timing matters because effects lag, accumulate, decay, or persist after input stops.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P036-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O9"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an input or exposure as the controlled antecedent of the comparison.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A focal input is applied within the comparison.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must hold the input constant rather than explain response differences by different input levels.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The input is the same across the compared instances.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve responses or effects as the outputs being compared.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The compared outputs are responses to the input.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require response heterogeneity rather than a common response under the same input.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The responses differ across the compared instances.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the directed input-to-response relation rather than mere co-occurrence.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The same input produces the differing responses.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires distinct agents receiving the same input and producing different responses.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The response difference is across agents.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires distinct contexts in which the same input produces different responses.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The response difference is across contexts.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires distinct compartments in which the same input produces different responses.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The response difference is across compartments.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires distinct phases in which the same input produces different responses.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "The response difference is across phases.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "The same input produces different responses across agents, contexts, compartments, or phases.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "The same input produces different responses across one selected comparison axis.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P036-C02-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid PK/PD model can describe one homogeneous subject and one compartment without cross-agent, context, compartment, or phase heterogeneity.", "slug": "pk_pd_modeling_pharmacokinetics_pharmacodynamics"}], "residual_id": "r:dose_exposure_response_trajectory_modeling:b023_a12_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b023_a12_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A decision maker controls an input but cares about a delayed, mediated, and often nonlinear response. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The same input produces different responses across agents, contexts, compartments, or phases.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The same input produces different responses across agents, contexts, compartments, or phases.", "A decision maker controls an input but cares about a delayed, mediated, and often nonlinear response."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Holding the complete carryover_effect record and qualifier 'The same later treatment is compared across units with and without residue from an earlier treatment.' fixed, I varied optional manifestations and found no complete instance that falsifies the selected DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Carryover Effect", "one_liner": "The validity threat in crossover and within-subject designs where residual influence from an earlier treatment persists into a later measurement window, biasing the contrast — its magnitude set by the unit's relaxation time against the inter-treatment gap.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:carryover_effect", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2", "O6"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "same_later_treatment_across_residue_groups", "predicate": "The same later treatment is compared across units with and without residue from an earlier treatment.", "rationale": "The candidate supplies the structural spine; the emitted qualifier is one anchored, atomic, non-restating fact sufficient for a complete DNF branch."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "carryover_effect"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "same_later_treatment_across_residue_groups"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "carryover_effect", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P036-C02-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record supplies residue-caused response heterogeneity. One controlled-comparison guard holds the later treatment constant across units with and without residue, completing the agent branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_GUARDED_EQUIVALENT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Holding the complete stimulus_response_compatibility record and qualifier 'The same task-relevant stimulus is held constant across compatible and incompatible response-code contexts.' fixed, I varied optional manifestations and found no complete instance that falsifies the selected DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Stimulus–Response Compatibility", "one_liner": "When a stimulus automatically activates a response code, performance improves if that code agrees with the task-mandated response and degrades if the codes conflict, even when the triggering feature is irrelevant.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:stimulus_response_compatibility", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "same_task_input_across_compatibility_contexts", "predicate": "The same task-relevant stimulus is held constant across compatible and incompatible response-code contexts.", "rationale": "The candidate supplies the structural spine; the emitted qualifier is one anchored, atomic, non-restating fact sufficient for a complete DNF branch."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "stimulus_response_compatibility"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "same_task_input_across_compatibility_contexts"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "stimulus_response_compatibility", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P036-C02-U1", "why_it_fits": "The candidate supplies causal performance heterogeneity across compatibility contexts. The single held-input guard makes stimulus identity necessary across those contexts."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Holding the complete perceptual_set record fixed, I varied optional manifestations and found no complete instance that falsifies the selected DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Perceptual Set", "one_liner": "Explain how prior expectation, context, motivation, or expertise biases what is perceived from ambiguous or degraded input — the percept is the prior weighted by how decisive the sensory evidence is, so the expectation dominates precisely when the stimulus underdetermines it.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:perceptual_set", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "perceptual_set"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "perceptual_set", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P036-C02-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every perceptual-set instance holds an ambiguous input fixed while prior context changes the perceptual response, directly satisfying the context branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Holding the complete word_superiority_effect record fixed, I varied optional manifestations and found no complete instance that falsifies the selected DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Word Superiority Effect", "one_liner": "The finding that a target letter is identified faster and more accurately inside a familiar word than in a non-word or alone, because an activated lexical whole feeds activation back down to its constituent letters within the stimulus window.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:word_superiority_effect", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "word_superiority_effect"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "word_superiority_effect", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P036-C02-U1", "why_it_fits": "The effect is defined by the same target letter eliciting different identification performance across lexical contexts, so one complete context branch is necessary."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Holding the complete crespi_effect record fixed, I varied optional manifestations and found no complete instance that falsifies the selected DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Crespi Effect", "one_liner": "Read operant behavior after a reward change as a discrepancy-driven transient rather than an absolute-value response: animals shifted up overshoot same-reward controls (elation) and animals shifted down undershoot them (depression), calibrated to the signed gap between delivery and a recalibrating expectation.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:crespi_effect", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "crespi_effect"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "crespi_effect", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P036-C02-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every Crespi-effect instance holds current reward constant and requires reward-history groups to respond differently, satisfying the agent branch directly."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Holding the complete partial_agonist record fixed, I varied optional manifestations and found no complete instance that falsifies the selected DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Partial Agonist", "one_liner": "A ligand that binds and activates a receptor but with intrinsic efficacy between zero and one, so even at full occupancy it produces a submaximal response — acting as an agonist when alone and a functional antagonist when a full agonist is present.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:partial_agonist", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "partial_agonist"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "partial_agonist", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P036-C02-U1", "why_it_fits": "A partial agonist necessarily yields different functional responses across the alone and competing-full-agonist contexts while the focal ligand is unchanged."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The same input produces different responses across agents, contexts, compartments, or phases.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime is the interval between a minimum effective dose and a maximum tolerable dose defined by efficacy and harm curves.", "role_mapping": "Ineffective below -> below MED; harmful above -> above MTD; useful range -> therapeutic window.", "slug": "therapeutic_window", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b023_a12_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: There is a useful operating range: below it the intervention is ineffective, above it the intervention becomes harmful, wasteful, or destabilizing. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["There is a useful operating range: below it the intervention is ineffective, above it the intervention becomes harmful, wasteful, or destabilizing."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Therapeutic Window", "one_liner": "Optimal input range.", "page_ref": "prime:therapeutic_window", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Ineffective below -> below MED; harmful above -> above MTD; useful range -> therapeutic window.", "slug": "therapeutic_window", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime is the interval between a minimum effective dose and a maximum tolerable dose defined by efficacy and harm curves."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A useful operating range lies between ineffective low input and harmful, wasteful, or destabilizing high input.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Decisions require forecasting candidate regimens before trying them in the live system.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: Decisions require forecasting candidate regimens before trying them in the live system. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Decisions require forecasting candidate regimens before trying them in the live system."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Decisions require forecasting candidate regimens before trying them in the live system."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 23, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-023", "ledger_sha256": "f372df8035c0a1bfd8349fb8198282398e86fa9e332ac226bf6eb4adb67551f4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Dose–Response Calibration", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:dose_response_calibration", "slug": "dose_response_calibration"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is an unknown or poorly understood input-output curve. Decision makers have an adjustable input, but they do not know how the system will respond at different levels. They may assume linearity, copy a level from another context, rely on precedent, or escalate after disappointment without checking whether stronger input is likely to help.\n\nThis creates predictable errors. A weak intervention can be dismissed as ineffective when it was only underpowered. A strong intervention can appear successful while quietly accumulating side effects. A team can keep escalating after a plateau because the total output still looks important, even though each additional increment adds little value.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system responds differently to different input intensities, but the response curve is unknown, assumed linear, stale, or mismatched to the goal; as a result, actors under-intervene, over-intervene, or escalate without evidence."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a quantified dose varied over a specified range and a response measured as a function of dose.", "role_mapping": "Intervention intensity -> dose D; multiple levels -> specified dose range.", "slug": "dose_response_relationship", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b023_a13_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The same kind of intervention can be applied at multiple intensities, frequencies, amounts, scopes, or strengths. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The same kind of intervention can be applied at multiple intensities, frequencies, amounts, scopes, or strengths."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Dose-Response Relationship", "one_liner": "Input-output mapping.", "page_ref": "prime:dose_response_relationship", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Intervention intensity -> dose D; multiple levels -> specified dose range.", "slug": "dose_response_relationship", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a quantified dose varied over a specified range and a response measured as a function of dose."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The same intervention can be applied at multiple intensities, frequencies, amounts, scopes, or strengths.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a response curve whose shape, threshold, slope, ceiling, and variability are explicit rather than assumed linear.", "role_mapping": "Response alternatives -> possible curve shapes and variability.", "slug": "dose_response_relationship", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b023_a13_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The response could be absent, beneficial, diminishing, delayed, harmful, or different across subgroups. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The response could be absent, beneficial, diminishing, delayed, harmful, or different across subgroups."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Dose-Response Relationship", "one_liner": "Input-output mapping.", "page_ref": "prime:dose_response_relationship", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Response alternatives -> possible curve shapes and variability.", "slug": "dose_response_relationship", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a response curve whose shape, threshold, slope, ceiling, and variability are explicit rather than assumed linear."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Response may be absent, beneficial, diminishing, delayed, harmful, or heterogeneous across subgroups.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P036-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve actors who choose or set an intervention or input intensity.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Decision makers are the actors selecting intensity.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve intensity selection rather than a generic decision with no level or dose.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The actors choose the intensity of a focal input or intervention.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the rather-than relation: measured response does not determine the chosen intensity.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The selected basis substitutes for measured response in choosing intensity.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires habitual practice to determine intensity.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The selected intensity basis is habit.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a prior case or established precedent to determine intensity.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The selected intensity basis is precedent.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires an authority or authoritative instruction to determine intensity.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The selected intensity basis is authority.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires an unsupported guess to determine intensity.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The selected intensity basis is guesswork.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Decision makers choose intensity from habit, precedent, authority, or guesswork rather than measured response.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Decision makers choose intensity from one selected non-response basis rather than measured response.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P036-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A dose-response curve can already be measured and used by evidence-based decision-makers.", "slug": "dose_response_relationship"}], "residual_id": "r:dose_response_calibration:b023_a13_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b023_a13_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Decision makers are choosing intensity from habit, precedent, authority, or guesswork rather than measured response. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Decision makers are choosing intensity from habit, precedent, authority, or guesswork rather than measured response."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A dose-response curve can already be measured and used by evidence-based decision-makers.", "slug": "dose_response_relationship"}], "normalized_requirement": "Decision-makers choose intensity from habit, precedent, authority, or guesswork rather than measured response.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Decision-makers choose intensity from habit, precedent, authority, or guesswork rather than measured response.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The cost of either underdose or overdose is material enough to justify calibration effort.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The cost of either underdose or overdose is material enough to justify calibration effort. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The cost of either underdose or overdose is material enough to justify calibration effort."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The cost of either underdose or overdose is material enough to justify calibration effort."}, {"display_text": "The intervention can be tested or adjusted within ethical and operational safety bounds.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Good use cases include alert thresholds, training load, staffing levels, policy strictness, advertising spend, incentive size, educational challenge level, and safety-sensitive clinical or technical interventions. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: The intervention can be tested or adjusted within ethical and operational safety bounds. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The intervention can be tested or adjusted within ethical and operational safety bounds.", "Good use cases include alert thresholds, training load, staffing levels, policy strictness, advertising spend, incentive size, educational challenge level, and safety-sensitive clinical or technical interventions."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The intervention can be tested or adjusted within ethical and operational safety bounds."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 23, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-023", "ledger_sha256": "f372df8035c0a1bfd8349fb8198282398e86fa9e332ac226bf6eb4adb67551f4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Downward Constraint Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:downward_constraint_design", "slug": "downward_constraint_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 3, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is distributed local action without adequate macro-level shaping. Local actors may be rational within their own context, but the aggregate result can be unsafe, incompatible, unfair, inefficient, or strategically misaligned.\n\nThe problem often appears as recurring local inconsistency, endless escalation, hidden workarounds, central approval overload, cultural drift, or rule proliferation. These are signs that the system is trying to solve a structural problem through repeated local correction. The right question is not only \"Who made the wrong decision?\" but \"What action space made that decision likely?\"\n\nThe root tension is coherence versus adaptation. A system needs shared constraints to preserve safety, quality, fairness, compatibility, or strategy. But local actors also need enough freedom to handle concrete circumstances. Too little constraint creates disorder; too much constraint creates brittleness or resistance.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Many lower-level actors or components act locally, but their behavior needs shaping by a higher-level structure, norm, architecture, or rule."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P036-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve actors or components acting at a local level within a larger system.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Local actors are the choice-making roles.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve local choices or actions rather than a static local condition.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The local actors make focal choices.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require repeated local choices rather than one isolated decision.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The locally chosen pattern recurs.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve local reasonableness rather than treating the choices as irrational at every level.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The choices are reasonable at the individual or local level.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve misalignment with the larger system rather than only local underperformance.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The same choices are misaligned at the system level.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must apply the opposing assessments to the same recurring choices across the two levels.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "Local reasonableness contrasts with systemic misalignment.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Local actors repeatedly make choices that are individually reasonable but systemically misaligned.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Local actors repeatedly make choices that are locally reasonable yet systemically misaligned.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P036-C04-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Strategic substitutes can yield a coherent equilibrium and do not necessarily create systemic misalignment.", "slug": "strategic_substitute"}], "residual_id": "r:downward_constraint_design:b023_a14_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b023_a14_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Local actors repeatedly make choices that are individually reasonable but systemically misaligned. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Local actors repeatedly make choices that are individually reasonable but systemically misaligned."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_SYNTHESIS", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Holding the complete common_operating_picture_breakdown record and qualifier 'Locally rational participant choices recur during the focal response.' fixed, I varied optional manifestations and found no complete instance that falsifies the selected DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Common-Operating-Picture Breakdown", "one_liner": "The failure mode where a multi-party response acts incoherently because its engineered shared picture fails to synthesise participants' partial views — relocating the fault from the responders to the artefact, whose currency, completeness, and consistency become the lever.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:common_operating_picture_breakdown", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O3"], "guard_type": "QUANTIFIER_BINDING", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "recurrent_locally_rational_response_choices", "predicate": "Locally rational participant choices recur during the focal response.", "rationale": "The candidate supplies the structural spine; the emitted qualifier is one anchored, atomic, non-restating fact sufficient for a complete DNF branch."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "common_operating_picture_breakdown"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "recurrent_locally_rational_response_choices"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "common_operating_picture_breakdown", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P036-C04-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record supplies the local-rational/global-incoherent contrast but permits one isolated episode. One atomic recurrence guard completes the repeated-choice requirement."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_GUARDED_EQUIVALENT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Holding the complete commanders_intent_ambiguity record and qualifier 'The locally rational choice pattern recurs across delegated decisions.' fixed, I varied optional manifestations and found no complete instance that falsifies the selected DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Commander's-Intent Ambiguity", "one_liner": "Locate incoherent decentralized execution in the purpose artefact one level up: when delegated subordinates must re-derive action under changed conditions but the intent statement is too imprecise to disambiguate their choice, locally rational actions aggregate into globally incoherent outcomes.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:commanders_intent_ambiguity", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O3"], "guard_type": "QUANTIFIER_BINDING", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "recurrent_delegated_choice_pattern", "predicate": "The locally rational choice pattern recurs across delegated decisions.", "rationale": "The candidate supplies the structural spine; the emitted qualifier is one anchored, atomic, non-restating fact sufficient for a complete DNF branch."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "commanders_intent_ambiguity"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "recurrent_delegated_choice_pattern"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "commanders_intent_ambiguity", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P036-C04-U1", "why_it_fits": "The candidate exactly supplies the local-to-system contrast. The sole atomic frequency guard makes that choice pattern recur across delegated decisions."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Holding the complete therapeutic_duplication record fixed, I varied optional manifestations and found no complete instance that falsifies the selected DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Therapeutic Duplication", "one_liner": "The medication-safety failure where uncoordinated prescribers each place a defensible order that lands on the same pharmacologic target, so additive exposure overruns the therapeutic window — a harm that lives in the set of orders, not in any single one.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:therapeutic_duplication", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "therapeutic_duplication"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "therapeutic_duplication", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P036-C04-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every therapeutic-duplication instance contains plural defensible local prescribing choices whose aggregate effect overruns the system-level therapeutic constraint."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Holding the complete parkinsons_law_of_triviality record fixed, I varied optional manifestations and found no complete instance that falsifies the selected DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Parkinson's Law of Triviality (Bikeshedding)", "one_liner": "Explain why a deliberating group allocates time to agenda items in inverse proportion to their consequence — because members contribute only where they can comprehend, so trivial-but-familiar items draw everyone while consequential-but-technical ones defer to a few.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:parkinsons_law_of_triviality", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "parkinsons_law_of_triviality"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "parkinsons_law_of_triviality", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P036-C04-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact pattern necessarily consists of individually reasonable contributions recurring across members and agenda items while their distribution produces an unintended system-level attention distortion."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Local actors repeatedly make individually reasonable but systemically misaligned choices.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P036-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a central actor or node that governs lower-level actions.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A central controller is the oversight actor.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve universal local-action scope rather than oversight of only selected exceptions.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The attempted oversight covers every local action.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the inability to combine universal oversight with non-bottleneck operation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The controller cannot perform the selected universal oversight without bottlenecking.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must connect the bottleneck to central oversight of every local action.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Applying the selected oversight mode universally makes the controller a bottleneck.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires the controller to approve every local action.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The selected oversight mode is approval.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires the controller to specify every local action.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The selected oversight mode is specification.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires the controller to supervise every local action.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The selected oversight mode is supervision.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "A central controller cannot approve, specify, or supervise every local action without becoming a bottleneck.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A central controller cannot apply one selected oversight mode to every local action without becoming a bottleneck.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P036-C05-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A bottleneck can be a machine, channel, or supply stage and need not arise from central supervision of local actions.", "slug": "bottleneck"}], "residual_id": "r:downward_constraint_design:b023_a14_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b023_a14_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A central controller cannot approve, specify, or supervise every local action without becoming a bottleneck. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A central controller cannot approve, specify, or supervise every local action without becoming a bottleneck."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A bottleneck can be a machine, channel, or supply stage and need not arise from central supervision of local actions.", "slug": "bottleneck"}], "normalized_requirement": "A central controller cannot supervise every local action without becoming a bottleneck.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A central controller cannot supervise every local action without becoming a bottleneck.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P036-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve downstream problems or failures as the observations being interpreted.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Downstream problems are the diagnostic evidence.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require repeated problems rather than one isolated downstream event.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The downstream problems recur.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must connect the observations to a defect in the available or shaped action space.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The repeated problems are evidence that the action space itself is poorly structured.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an evidential indication and must not strengthen the source to deductive certainty.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The problems suggest the structural diagnosis rather than prove it with certainty.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve that a reminders-only explanation is insufficient without asserting reminders can never help.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The diagnosis goes beyond merely needing to remind individuals more.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Repeated downstream problems suggest that the action space is poorly structured rather than merely under-reminded.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Repeated downstream problems indicate poor action-space structure beyond a reminders-only explanation.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P036-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Designed-out misuse is a remedy pattern and does not require a history of repeated downstream failures or a rejected reminder explanation.", "slug": "designed_out_misuse"}], "residual_id": "r:downward_constraint_design:b023_a14_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b023_a14_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Repeated downstream problems suggest that the action space itself is poorly structured, not merely that individuals need more reminders. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Repeated downstream problems suggest that the action space itself is poorly structured, not merely that individuals need more reminders."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_SYNTHESIS", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Holding the complete navigation_loop record and qualifier 'Users repeatedly encounter the same closed non-goal navigation cycle.' fixed, I varied optional manifestations and found no complete instance that falsifies the selected DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Navigation loop", "one_liner": "Diagnose a workflow where a user cannot reach their goal by modeling the interface as a directed graph and asking one structural question — is any goal state reachable from the current state? — rather than blaming screen quality or user confusion.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:navigation_loop", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2"], "guard_type": "QUANTIFIER_BINDING", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "repeated_closed_navigation_cycle_encounters", "predicate": "Users repeatedly encounter the same closed non-goal navigation cycle.", "rationale": "The candidate supplies the structural spine; the emitted qualifier is one anchored, atomic, non-restating fact sufficient for a complete DNF branch."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "navigation_loop"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "repeated_closed_navigation_cycle_encounters"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "navigation_loop", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P036-C06-U1", "why_it_fits": "The candidate supplies the structural action-space diagnosis and rules out person-level remediation, but can exist before repeated user failures. One recurrence guard closes that necessity gap."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Holding the complete initiative_loss record fixed, I varied optional manifestations and found no complete instance that falsifies the selected DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Initiative Loss", "one_liner": "The failure mode in which an actor's decision cycle becomes structurally subordinated to an opponent's tempo, so every move is a forced reaction — a trap that faster reacting only deepens, recoverable only by changing the move-space.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:initiative_loss", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "initiative_loss"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "initiative_loss", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P036-C06-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every initiative-loss instance contains recurring forced reactions caused by decision-cycle subordination, locates the defect in the move-space, and expressly rejects faster individual reaction as sufficient."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_GUARDED_EQUIVALENT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Holding the complete rules_of_engagement_ambiguity record and qualifier 'Frontline breakdowns recur under the same rule-grain mismatch.' fixed, I varied optional manifestations and found no complete instance that falsifies the selected DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Rules-of-Engagement Ambiguity", "one_liner": "Diagnose frontline breakdown under time pressure as a grain mismatch — decision rules written coarser than the environment generates choice points — paid out of a finite discretion budget, relocating the fix from the operator's judgment to the rule, escalation path, and pre-positioned authority.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:rules_of_engagement_ambiguity", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2"], "guard_type": "QUANTIFIER_BINDING", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "recurrent_rule_grain_breakdown", "predicate": "Frontline breakdowns recur under the same rule-grain mismatch.", "rationale": "The candidate supplies the structural spine; the emitted qualifier is one anchored, atomic, non-restating fact sufficient for a complete DNF branch."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "rules_of_engagement_ambiguity"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "recurrent_rule_grain_breakdown"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "rules_of_engagement_ambiguity", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P036-C06-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record supplies the structural diagnosis and reminders-only contrast. One recurrence qualifier completes the repeated-problem requirement."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Repeated downstream problems show that the action space is poorly structured rather than merely under-reminded.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P036-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a default, rather than another feature type, as the mechanism.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A default is the behavior-shaping mechanism.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve behavior or choices at a local level as the downstream object.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Local behavior is the shaped object.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve direction from the default to local behavior rather than the reverse.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The default shapes local behavior.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require that the operative default is not visible or explicit to affected local actors.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The behavior-shaping default is invisible.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve absence of deliberate design rather than an intentionally engineered default.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The behavior-shaping default was never deliberately designed.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Invisible defaults that were never deliberately designed shape local behavior.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An invisible, never-deliberately-designed default shapes local behavior.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P036-C07-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P036-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an incentive, rather than another feature type, as the mechanism.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An incentive is the behavior-shaping mechanism.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve behavior or choices at a local level as the downstream object.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Local behavior is the shaped object.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve direction from the incentive to local behavior rather than the reverse.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The incentive shapes local behavior.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require that the operative incentive is not visible or explicit to affected local actors.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The behavior-shaping incentive is invisible.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve absence of deliberate design rather than an intentionally engineered incentive.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The behavior-shaping incentive was never deliberately designed.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Invisible incentives that were never deliberately designed shape local behavior.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An invisible, never-deliberately-designed incentive shapes local behavior.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P036-C07-U2"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P036-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a norm, rather than another feature type, as the mechanism.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A norm is the behavior-shaping mechanism.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve behavior or choices at a local level as the downstream object.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Local behavior is the shaped object.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve direction from the norm to local behavior rather than the reverse.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The norm shapes local behavior.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require that the operative norm is not visible or explicit to affected local actors.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The behavior-shaping norm is invisible.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve absence of deliberate design rather than an intentionally engineered norm.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The behavior-shaping norm was never deliberately designed.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Invisible norms that were never deliberately designed shape local behavior.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An invisible, never-deliberately-designed norm shapes local behavior.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P036-C07-U3"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P036-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a permission structure, rather than another feature type, as the mechanism.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A permission structure is the behavior-shaping mechanism.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve behavior or choices at a local level as the downstream object.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Local behavior is the shaped object.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve direction from the permission structure to local behavior rather than the reverse.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The permission structure shapes local behavior.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require that the operative permission structure is not visible or explicit to affected local actors.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The behavior-shaping permission structure is invisible.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve absence of deliberate design rather than an intentionally engineered permission structure.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The behavior-shaping permission structure was never deliberately designed.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Invisible permissions that were never deliberately designed shape local behavior.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An invisible, never-deliberately-designed permission structure shapes local behavior.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P036-C07-U4"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P036-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an architecture, rather than another feature type, as the mechanism.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An architecture is the behavior-shaping mechanism.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve behavior or choices at a local level as the downstream object.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Local behavior is the shaped object.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve direction from the architecture to local behavior rather than the reverse.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The architecture shapes local behavior.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require that the operative architecture is not visible or explicit to affected local actors.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The behavior-shaping architecture is invisible.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve absence of deliberate design rather than an intentionally engineered architecture.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The behavior-shaping architecture was never deliberately designed.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Invisible architectures that were never deliberately designed shape local behavior.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An invisible, never-deliberately-designed architecture shapes local behavior.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P036-C07-U5"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Substrate cues can be deliberately engineered and visible; unintentional invisible shaping is not mandatory.", "slug": "substrate_cued_behavior_recruitment"}], "residual_id": "r:downward_constraint_design:b023_a14_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b023_a14_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Local behavior is shaped by invisible defaults, incentives, norms, permissions, or architectures that were never deliberately designed. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Local behavior is shaped by invisible defaults, incentives, norms, permissions, or architectures that were never deliberately designed."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 5, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 5}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Substrate cues can be deliberately engineered and visible; unintentional invisible shaping is not mandatory.", "slug": "substrate_cued_behavior_recruitment"}], "normalized_requirement": "Invisible defaults, incentives, norms, permissions, or architectures shape local behavior without deliberate design.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 5 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Invisible defaults, incentives, norms, permissions, or architectures shape local behavior without deliberate design.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P036-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve compliance with a system-level or broad goal as the outcome at stake.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Compliance with a broad goal is the dependent outcome.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must make local choices necessary to compliance rather than merely associated with it.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Broad-goal compliance depends on local choices.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require repeated local choices rather than one one-time implementation decision.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The local choices recur.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve distributed plural choice sites rather than one local actor or component.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The choices are distributed across multiple instances of the selected holder type.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires recurring local choices across teams.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The distributed choice holders are teams.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires recurring local choices across system components.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The distributed choice holders are components.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires recurring local choices across institutions.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The distributed choice holders are institutions.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires recurring local choices across users.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The distributed choice holders are users.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Compliance with a broad goal depends on recurring local choices across teams, components, institutions, or users.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Compliance with a broad goal depends on recurring local choices distributed across one selected holder type.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P036-C08-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A constraint can govern one choice or one component and need not implement a broad distributed goal.", "slug": "constraint"}], "residual_id": "r:downward_constraint_design:b023_a14_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b023_a14_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Compliance with a broad goal depends on recurring local choices across teams, components, institutions, or users. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Compliance with a broad goal depends on recurring local choices across teams, components, institutions, or users."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Holding the complete commanders_intent_ambiguity record and qualifier 'Delegated system components repeatedly re-derive local choices across changed conditions.' fixed, I varied optional manifestations and found no complete instance that falsifies the selected DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Commander's-Intent Ambiguity", "one_liner": "Locate incoherent decentralized execution in the purpose artefact one level up: when delegated subordinates must re-derive action under changed conditions but the intent statement is too imprecise to disambiguate their choice, locally rational actions aggregate into globally incoherent outcomes.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:commanders_intent_ambiguity", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O3"], "guard_type": "QUANTIFIER_BINDING", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "recurring_delegated_component_choices", "predicate": "Delegated system components repeatedly re-derive local choices across changed conditions.", "rationale": "The candidate supplies the structural spine; the emitted qualifier is one anchored, atomic, non-restating fact sufficient for a complete DNF branch."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "commanders_intent_ambiguity"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "recurring_delegated_component_choices"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "commanders_intent_ambiguity", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P036-C08-U1", "why_it_fits": "The candidate supplies plural delegated components and purpose dependence, but one episode can instantiate it. The recurrence guard completes the component branch without adding another role."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A broad goal depends on recurring local choices across teams, components, institutions, or users.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The system needs coherence across many cases while preserving local adaptation and judgment.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "System-level coherence requires some higher-level shaping, but local contexts require autonomy, interpretation, and adaptation. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: The system needs coherence across many cases while preserving local adaptation and judgment. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The system needs coherence across many cases while preserving local adaptation and judgment.", "System-level coherence requires some higher-level shaping, but local contexts require autonomy, interpretation, and adaptation."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "The system needs coherence across many cases while preserving local adaptation and judgment."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 23, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-023", "ledger_sha256": "f372df8035c0a1bfd8349fb8198282398e86fa9e332ac226bf6eb4adb67551f4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Dual-Frame Analysis", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:dual_frame_analysis", "slug": "dual_frame_analysis"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 3, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is single-frame dominance. A decision process has adopted one model, metric, story, or vantage point as if it were complete. That frame can be useful, but it makes some evidence salient and other evidence invisible. As a result, the decision can be coherent within the chosen frame and still fail in the real system.\n\nA common sign is a recommendation that looks clean on paper but produces persistent objections, exceptions, harms, or implementation breakdowns that the dominant frame cannot explain.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A single frame explains some behavior but systematically misses another aspect that changes the decision, so action based on that frame alone is plausible but incomplete."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P036-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6", "O10"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6", "O11"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O7", "O10"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O7", "O11"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O8", "O10"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O8", "O11"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O9", "O10"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O9", "O11"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the same decision as the object of both assessments.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "One focal decision is assessed under both frames.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an apparent positive assessment under the first frame without asserting objective correctness.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The decision appears correct under the first selected frame.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve another frame and an adverse assessment of the same decision under it.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A distinct second frame gives the decision the selected adverse assessment.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the correct-versus-adverse contrast across the two frames.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The two frame-relative assessments conflict.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve two different frames rather than two readings within one unchanged frame.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The first and second frames are distinct.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This frame branch requires a model to supply the initial correct-looking assessment.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The first selected frame is a model.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This frame branch requires a metric to supply the initial correct-looking assessment.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The first selected frame is a metric.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This frame branch requires a stakeholder view to supply the initial correct-looking assessment.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The first selected frame is a stakeholder view.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This frame branch requires a disciplinary lens to supply the initial correct-looking assessment.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "The first selected frame is a disciplinary lens.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This outcome branch requires the second frame to make the decision appear wrong.", "obligation_id": "O10", "statement": "The adverse assessment under the second frame is that the decision is wrong.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This outcome branch requires the second frame to make the decision appear fragile.", "obligation_id": "O11", "statement": "The adverse assessment under the second frame is that the decision is fragile.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "A decision looks correct under one selected frame but wrong or fragile under another.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "The same decision appears correct under one selected frame but receives an adverse assessment under a distinct frame.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P036-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Framing can influence perception without two frames producing opposing decision assessments.", "slug": "framing"}], "residual_id": "r:dual_frame_analysis:b023_a15_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b023_a15_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A decision looks correct under one model, metric, stakeholder view, or disciplinary lens but feels wrong or fragile under another. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A decision looks correct under one model, metric, stakeholder view, or disciplinary lens but feels wrong or fragile under another."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Holding the complete status_quo_trap record and qualifier 'The initial incumbency frame is the focal stakeholder's view of the decision.' fixed, I varied optional manifestations and found no complete instance that falsifies the selected DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Status Quo Trap", "one_liner": "Frame status quo bias as a named trap a single deliberating actor can counter: recognise that the current course wins only because the switch must be defended while the staying is not, then run the fresh-start counterfactual that forces it to compete on its merits.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:status_quo_trap", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O8"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "incumbency_frame_is_stakeholder_view", "predicate": "The initial incumbency frame is the focal stakeholder's view of the decision.", "rationale": "The candidate supplies the structural spine; the emitted qualifier is one anchored, atomic, non-restating fact sufficient for a complete DNF branch."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "status_quo_trap"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "incumbency_frame_is_stakeholder_view"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "status_quo_trap", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P036-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "The candidate supplies the conflicting two-frame assessment. One atomic type restriction selects the stakeholder-view branch for the incumbency frame."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Holding the complete golden_hammer_anti_pattern record fixed, I varied optional manifestations and found no complete instance that falsifies the selected DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Golden Hammer Anti-Pattern", "one_liner": "Diagnose a team applying its familiar technology to a poorly-fitting problem because the acquisition cost of an alternative is visible while the misfit cost is diffuse and downstream, so fluency reshapes what counts as the right tool before fit is ever asked.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:golden_hammer_anti_pattern", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "golden_hammer_anti_pattern"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "golden_hammer_anti_pattern", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P036-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every golden-hammer instance makes the same tool choice look correct on its visible acquisition-cost metric while a distinct fit assessment finds it wrong."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A decision looks correct under one frame but wrong or fragile under another.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P036-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve two distinct group sides rather than one actor's internal uncertainty.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Two focal groups are involved.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve disagreement between the groups concerning one shared situation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The two groups disagree about the same situation.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve one operative frame for each of the two groups.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Each group uses a frame for the situation.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require frame difference rather than disagreement within one shared frame.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The two groups use different frames.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve partial validity for both frames, not one valid frame opposed by a wholly false one.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Each of the two frames captures a real part of the situation.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must make the groups disagree because of their distinct frames rather than merely co-locate both facts.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The frame difference causes the groups' disagreement.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Two groups disagree because each uses a different frame that captures a real part of the situation.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Two groups disagree because each uses a distinct frame that captures a real part of the same situation.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P036-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A frame may be false, shared, or held by one actor; two groups with mutually partial validity are not mandatory.", "slug": "framing"}], "residual_id": "r:dual_frame_analysis:b023_a15_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b023_a15_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Two groups disagree because each side is using a different frame that captures a real part of the situation. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Two groups disagree because each side is using a different frame that captures a real part of the situation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A frame may be false, shared, or held by one actor; two groups with mutually partial validity are not mandatory.", "slug": "framing"}], "normalized_requirement": "Two groups disagree because each uses a different frame that captures a real part of the situation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Two groups disagree because each uses a different frame that captures a real part of the situation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P036-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve evidence or data as the object containing the inconsistency.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A focal evidence set is the contradiction-bearing object.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require contradictory evidentiary contents rather than mere uncertainty or missing values.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The evidence set contains contradictions.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve additional data collection as the proposed way to resolve the contradictions.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The attempted resolution operation is collecting additional data.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the same-kind restriction rather than allow a different measurement or frame.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The additional data are of the same kind as the existing data.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require insufficiency of more same-kind data rather than merely uncertain eventual success.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Same-kind additional data cannot resolve the contradictions.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Evidence contains contradictions that cannot be resolved by collecting more data of the same kind.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Contradictions in an evidence set cannot be resolved by collecting more evidence of the same kind.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P036-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A framing effect can occur with internally consistent evidence and may be resolved by additional same-kind data.", "slug": "framing"}], "residual_id": "r:dual_frame_analysis:b023_a15_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b023_a15_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The evidence contains contradictions that cannot be resolved by collecting more of the same kind of data. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The evidence contains contradictions that cannot be resolved by collecting more of the same kind of data."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Holding the complete label_ambiguity record fixed, I varied optional manifestations and found no complete instance that falsifies the selected DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Label Ambiguity", "one_liner": "Diagnose a headline accuracy figure as a blend of two measurements — model capability in the class interior where annotators agree, and mere adjudication agreement in the boundary zone where reasonable experts split — by stratifying metrics on the inter-annotator agreement rate.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:label_ambiguity", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "label_ambiguity"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "label_ambiguity", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P036-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record expressly distinguishes systematic boundary ambiguity from reducible random noise: more same-kind annotators estimate disagreement but cannot resolve the contested category boundary."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Evidence contains contradictions that more data of the same kind cannot resolve.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P036-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a frame or lens as the focal part rather than an unrelated solution component.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A selected analytical frame is the object being treated as complete.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the as-if-whole relation rather than explicit recognition that the frame is partial.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The selected frame is treated as equivalent to the whole problem.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve repeated treatment rather than one isolated analytic shortcut.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The part-for-whole treatment recurs.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a technical frame to be treated as the whole problem.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The selected frame is technical.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires an economic frame to be treated as the whole problem.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The selected frame is economic.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires an ethical frame to be treated as the whole problem.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The selected frame is ethical.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a user frame to be treated as the whole problem.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The selected frame is a user frame.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires an operational frame to be treated as the whole problem.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The selected frame is operational.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "A technical, economic, ethical, user, or operational frame keeps being treated as if it were the whole problem.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "One selected partial frame is repeatedly treated as equivalent to the whole problem.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P036-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A frame can be explicitly partial and need not belong to one of the listed professional lenses.", "slug": "framing"}], "residual_id": "r:dual_frame_analysis:b023_a15_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b023_a15_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A technical, economic, ethical, user, or operational frame keeps being treated as if it were the whole problem. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A technical, economic, ethical, user, or operational frame keeps being treated as if it were the whole problem."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A frame can be explicitly partial and need not belong to one of the listed professional lenses.", "slug": "framing"}], "normalized_requirement": "A technical, economic, ethical, user, or operational frame is treated as the whole problem.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A technical, economic, ethical, user, or operational frame is treated as the whole problem.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P036-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an intervention as the common cause of both optimization and adverse consequence.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A focal intervention is the action being assessed.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve prospective proposal status rather than require a completed intervention.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The intervention is proposed.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve optimization of one criterion rather than generic improvement across all frames.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The intervention optimizes one focal criterion.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve another frame and the hidden cross-frame contrast rather than one visible cost within the optimized criterion.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A distinct frame reveals an adverse consequence hidden by the focal criterion.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must connect the hidden adverse consequence to the intervention rather than merely place both in the same setting.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The proposed intervention creates the selected adverse consequence.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires hidden harm in the other frame.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The hidden adverse consequence is harm.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires hidden friction in the other frame.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The hidden adverse consequence is friction.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires hidden failure in the other frame.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The hidden adverse consequence is failure.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "A proposed intervention optimizes one criterion while creating hidden harm, friction, or failure in another frame.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A proposed intervention optimizes one criterion while creating a hidden adverse consequence in another frame.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P036-C13-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Framing alone does not require an intervention, optimization, or hidden harm in another frame.", "slug": "framing"}], "residual_id": "r:dual_frame_analysis:b023_a15_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b023_a15_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A proposed intervention optimizes one criterion while creating hidden harm, friction, or failure in another frame. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A proposed intervention optimizes one criterion while creating hidden harm, friction, or failure in another frame."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Holding the complete golden_hammer_anti_pattern record and qualifier 'The familiar-tool selection is still a proposed intervention rather than a completed deployment.' fixed, I varied optional manifestations and found no complete instance that falsifies the selected DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Golden Hammer Anti-Pattern", "one_liner": "Diagnose a team applying its familiar technology to a poorly-fitting problem because the acquisition cost of an alternative is visible while the misfit cost is diffuse and downstream, so fluency reshapes what counts as the right tool before fit is ever asked.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:golden_hammer_anti_pattern", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2"], "guard_type": "TIMING_BINDING", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "tool_selection_still_proposed", "predicate": "The familiar-tool selection is still a proposed intervention rather than a completed deployment.", "rationale": "The candidate supplies the structural spine; the emitted qualifier is one anchored, atomic, non-restating fact sufficient for a complete DNF branch."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "golden_hammer_anti_pattern"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "tool_selection_still_proposed"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "golden_hammer_anti_pattern", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P036-C13-U1", "why_it_fits": "The candidate supplies single-criterion selection and hidden fit friction. The sole timing guard restricts the existing choice to its proposal phase."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "An intervention optimizes one criterion while creating hidden harm, friction, or failure in another frame.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 23, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-023", "ledger_sha256": "f372df8035c0a1bfd8349fb8198282398e86fa9e332ac226bf6eb4adb67551f4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Durable Identifier Binding", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:durable_identifier_binding", "slug": "durable_identifier_binding"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system must keep referring to the same entity across changes in name, description, representation, location, custodian, version, or local context. If every future reference depends on re-description or ad hoc matching, different parties create duplicate records, collide on names, merge unlike entities, split the same entity into fragments, lose provenance, or cannot tell whether a later item is the same referent as an earlier one.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system must keep referring to the same entity across changes in name, description, representation, location, custodian, version, or local context. If every future reference depends on re-description or ad hoc matching, different parties create duplicate records, collide on names, merge unlike entities, split the same entity into fragments, lose provenance, or cannot tell whether a later item is the same referent as an earlier one."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires references to an entity to remain safe to copy, forward, and embed across substrate changes.", "role_mapping": "Referenced entity -> referent; durable copied reference -> use across moments or contexts.", "slug": "persistent_identifier", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b024_a01_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A referent will be cited, looked up, transferred, audited, updated, retrieved, preserved, or joined across more than one moment or context. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A referent will be cited, looked up, transferred, audited, updated, retrieved, preserved, or joined across more than one moment or context."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Persistent Identifier", "one_liner": "A designed token committed to keep resolving to its entity across changes in the entity's location, representation, custodian, or version, via a separately maintained resolver.", "page_ref": "prime:persistent_identifier", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Referenced entity -> referent; durable copied reference -> use across moments or contexts.", "slug": "persistent_identifier", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires references to an entity to remain safe to copy, forward, and embed across substrate changes."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A referent is actually referenced across more than one moment or context.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires an entity whose location, representation, custodian, or version may change while the opaque token continues resolving.", "role_mapping": "Mutable entity properties -> changing descriptors; stable token resolution -> stable reference.", "slug": "persistent_identifier", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b024_a01_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Descriptions, labels, locations, custodians, or attributes may change while the system still needs stable reference. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Descriptions, labels, locations, custodians, or attributes may change while the system still needs stable reference."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Persistent Identifier", "one_liner": "A designed token committed to keep resolving to its entity across changes in the entity's location, representation, custodian, or version, via a separately maintained resolver.", "page_ref": "prime:persistent_identifier", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Mutable entity properties -> changing descriptors; stable token resolution -> stable reference.", "slug": "persistent_identifier", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires an entity whose location, representation, custodian, or version may change while the opaque token continues resolving."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Mutable descriptions, locations, custodians, or representations coexist with a need for stable reference.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires a maintained identity scope across representations or versions and explicitly makes aliasing and merging representable.", "role_mapping": "Representational variants -> aliases or versions; identity scope -> same referent.", "slug": "persistent_identifier", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b024_a01_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The same referent may have aliases, translations, spelling variants, versioned representations, or successor/predecessor relations. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The same referent may have aliases, translations, spelling variants, versioned representations, or successor/predecessor relations."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Persistent Identifier", "one_liner": "A designed token committed to keep resolving to its entity across changes in the entity's location, representation, custodian, or version, via a separately maintained resolver.", "page_ref": "prime:persistent_identifier", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Representational variants -> aliases or versions; identity scope -> same referent.", "slug": "persistent_identifier", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires a maintained identity scope across representations or versions and explicitly makes aliasing and merging representable."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "One referent can have aliases, translations, variants, versions, or successor relations.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Multiple parties need a common handle that does not depend on private memory or local naming conventions.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "If every future reference depends on re-description or ad hoc matching, different parties create duplicate records, collide on names, merge unlike entities, split the same entity into fragments, lose provenance, or cannot tell whether a later item is the same referent as an earlier one. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: Multiple parties need a common handle that does not depend on private memory or local naming conventions. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Multiple parties need a common handle that does not depend on private memory or local naming conventions.", "If every future reference depends on re-description or ad hoc matching, different parties create duplicate records, collide on names, merge unlike entities, split the same entity into fragments, lose provenance, or cannot tell whether a later item is the same referent as an earlier one."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Multiple parties need a common handle that does not depend on private memory or local naming conventions."}, {"display_text": "False merge, false split, identifier collision, reuse, or orphaned references would produce downstream harm.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Identifier assignment must make reference stable without pretending that entities, descriptions, and institutional authority are static. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: False merge, false split, identifier collision, reuse, or orphaned references would produce downstream harm. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["False merge, false split, identifier collision, reuse, or orphaned references would produce downstream harm.", "Identifier assignment must make reference stable without pretending that entities, descriptions, and institutional authority are static."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "False merge, false split, identifier collision, reuse, or orphaned references would produce downstream harm."}, {"display_text": "An accountable authority can maintain at least minimal uniqueness, binding, lifecycle, and lookup rules.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: An accountable authority can maintain at least minimal uniqueness, binding, lifecycle, and lookup rules. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["An accountable authority can maintain at least minimal uniqueness, binding, lifecycle, and lookup rules."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "An accountable authority can maintain at least minimal uniqueness, binding, lifecycle, and lookup rules."}, {"display_text": "The system needs a citable reference object for provenance, authentication, retrieval, access, or traceability workflows.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "If every future reference depends on re-description or ad hoc matching, different parties create duplicate records, collide on names, merge unlike entities, split the same entity into fragments, lose provenance, or cannot tell whether a later item is the same referent as an earlier one. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: The system needs a citable reference object for provenance, authentication, retrieval, access, or traceability workflows. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The system needs a citable reference object for provenance, authentication, retrieval, access, or traceability workflows.", "If every future reference depends on re-description or ad hoc matching, different parties create duplicate records, collide on names, merge unlike entities, split the same entity into fragments, lose provenance, or cannot tell whether a later item is the same referent as an earlier one."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "The system needs a citable reference object for provenance, authentication, retrieval, access, or traceability workflows."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 24, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-024", "ledger_sha256": "0fec5317f30d34d75f29843acd71bce6a96b4eb45a29cdd4824323f3fc44300c"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Duration-Matched Commitment Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:duration_matched_commitment_design", "slug": "duration_matched_commitment_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 5, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system accepts short-duration obligations while holding resources, capacity, assets, or commitments that mature on a longer duration. Normal operation depends on repeatedly refreshing the short side. When refresh stops, the system cannot meet immediate claims without forced conversion, service failure, expensive rescue, or contract breach, even though it may still have enough resources in a long-run accounting sense.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system accepts short-duration obligations while holding resources, capacity, assets, or commitments that mature on a longer duration. Normal operation depends on repeatedly refreshing the short side. When refresh stops, the system cannot meet immediate claims without forced conversion, service failure, expensive rescue, or contract breach, even though it may still have enough resources in a long-run accounting sense."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires obligations and capacity on two sides of one resource relation.", "role_mapping": "Two-sided commitments -> short obligations and long capacity.", "slug": "maturity_mismatch", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b024_a02_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Two-sided commitment structure. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Two-sided commitment structure"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Maturity Mismatch", "one_liner": "A system holds two-sided commitments whose durations differ — a short side that must be repeatedly refreshed against a long side that cannot accelerate — so it fails when refreshing stops, not because it lacks resources but because they are locked in durations longer than the moment requires.", "page_ref": "prime:maturity_mismatch", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Two-sided commitments -> short obligations and long capacity.", "slug": "maturity_mismatch", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires obligations and capacity on two sides of one resource relation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The system holds two-sided commitments.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Mismatched maturity distributions are the prime's defining relation.", "role_mapping": "Unequal horizons -> mismatched maturity distributions.", "slug": "maturity_mismatch", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b024_a02_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Unequal maturity or release horizons. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Unequal maturity or release horizons"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Maturity Mismatch", "one_liner": "A system holds two-sided commitments whose durations differ — a short side that must be repeatedly refreshed against a long side that cannot accelerate — so it fails when refreshing stops, not because it lacks resources but because they are locked in durations longer than the moment requires.", "page_ref": "prime:maturity_mismatch", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Unequal horizons -> mismatched maturity distributions.", "slug": "maturity_mismatch", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Mismatched maturity distributions are the prime's defining relation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The two sides have unequal maturity or release horizons.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires a short side that must be repeatedly rolled over, renewed, or restocked.", "role_mapping": "Refresh dependence -> short-side rollover.", "slug": "maturity_mismatch", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b024_a02_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Rollover or refresh dependence. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Rollover or refresh dependence"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Maturity Mismatch", "one_liner": "A system holds two-sided commitments whose durations differ — a short side that must be repeatedly refreshed against a long side that cannot accelerate — so it fails when refreshing stops, not because it lacks resources but because they are locked in durations longer than the moment requires.", "page_ref": "prime:maturity_mismatch", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Refresh dependence -> short-side rollover.", "slug": "maturity_mismatch", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires a short side that must be repeatedly rolled over, renewed, or restocked."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The short side depends on rollover, renewal, replenishment, or refresh.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Rollover failure occurs despite adequate net resources because the long side cannot accelerate and value is duration-locked.", "role_mapping": "Locked value -> long side; required moment -> short maturity.", "slug": "maturity_mismatch", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b024_a02_c4a", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Locked value is mistaken for available value. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Locked value is mistaken for available value"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Maturity Mismatch", "one_liner": "A system holds two-sided commitments whose durations differ — a short side that must be repeatedly refreshed against a long side that cannot accelerate — so it fails when refreshing stops, not because it lacks resources but because they are locked in durations longer than the moment requires.", "page_ref": "prime:maturity_mismatch", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Locked value -> long side; required moment -> short maturity.", "slug": "maturity_mismatch", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Rollover failure occurs despite adequate net resources because the long side cannot accelerate and value is duration-locked."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Value exists but is locked beyond the moment when claims require it.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "When refreshing stops, immediate availability collapses while long-run resource totals can remain adequate.", "role_mapping": "Stress closure -> rollover failure; quantity retained -> net solvency.", "slug": "maturity_mismatch", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b024_a02_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Stress changes availability faster than quantity. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Stress changes availability faster than quantity"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Maturity Mismatch", "one_liner": "A system holds two-sided commitments whose durations differ — a short side that must be repeatedly refreshed against a long side that cannot accelerate — so it fails when refreshing stops, not because it lacks resources but because they are locked in durations longer than the moment requires.", "page_ref": "prime:maturity_mismatch", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Stress closure -> rollover failure; quantity retained -> net solvency.", "slug": "maturity_mismatch", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "When refreshing stops, immediate availability collapses while long-run resource totals can remain adequate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Stress or rollover closure reduces availability faster than total resource quantity.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "No owner can rebalance both sides.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: No owner can rebalance both sides. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["No owner can rebalance both sides"]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "No owner can rebalance both sides"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 24, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-024", "ledger_sha256": "0fec5317f30d34d75f29843acd71bce6a96b4eb45a29cdd4824323f3fc44300c"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": [{"groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Holding the complete triffin_dilemma record fixed, I varied optional manifestations and found no complete instance that falsifies the selected DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Triffin Dilemma", "one_liner": "The structural bind in which a national currency serving as the world's reserve asset must run persistent deficits to supply global liquidity, yet those same deficits erode the confidence that makes the currency worth holding — two roles one issuer cannot jointly satisfy over time.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:triffin_dilemma", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "triffin_dilemma"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "triffin_dilemma", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P036-C14-U1", "why_it_fits": "The dilemma necessarily places two jointly unsatisfiable commitments under one issuer and expressly rules out any stable adjustment that rebalances both sides over time."}], "publication_role": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT_ONLY", "source_residual_occurrence_id": "r:duration_matched_commitment_design:b024_a02_c6", "unit": {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P036-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the paired sides of one commitment arrangement rather than unrelated objects.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A focal commitment arrangement has two sides requiring rebalancing.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an owner or controlling actor as the role whose cross-side capability is assessed.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "An owner is the candidate rebalancing role.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve absence of one owner capable of the operation rather than a present but inactive owner.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "No single owner has the required rebalancing capability.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve rebalancing or coordinated adjustment rather than generic observation or advice.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The missing capability is to rebalance the arrangement.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve both-side scope and cannot satisfy the unit with separate one-sided owners.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The missing capability must cover both sides under the same owner.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}], "predicate": "No owner can rebalance both sides of the focal commitment arrangement.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "No single owner can rebalance both sides of the focal two-sided commitment arrangement.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P036-C14-U1"}}]}
{"archetype": {"name": "Dynamic Subproblem Reuse", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:dynamic_subproblem_reuse", "slug": "dynamic_subproblem_reuse"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 2 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 2}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is overlapping subproblem recurrence. A larger system appears complex partly because it keeps revisiting smaller problems that have already been solved. Without an explicit reuse structure, different actors recompute answers, produce inconsistent results, or rely on memory and habit rather than an auditable partial solution.\n\nThe root tension is between global coherence and local repetition. Local actors experience each subproblem as a fresh task. The larger system would benefit from treating repeated subproblems as reusable states with stored answers.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A larger decision, plan, computation, or organizational process repeatedly solves the same or equivalent subproblem, causing wasted effort, inconsistent answers, hidden drift, and unnecessary complexity."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires overlapping subproblems that naive recursion would solve repeatedly.", "role_mapping": "Repeated local problem -> overlapping subproblem; multiple paths -> repeated recursive calls.", "slug": "dynamic_programming", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b024_a03_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The same local problem appears through multiple paths in a larger process. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The same local problem appears through multiple paths in a larger process."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Dynamic Programming", "one_liner": "Solve via subproblem reuse.", "page_ref": "prime:dynamic_programming", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Repeated local problem -> overlapping subproblem; multiple paths -> repeated recursive calls.", "slug": "dynamic_programming", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires overlapping subproblems that naive recursion would solve repeatedly."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The same subproblem recurs through multiple paths in a larger process.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a well-defined state representation containing all information needed for a subproblem.", "role_mapping": "Recognizable key -> state representation.", "slug": "dynamic_programming", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b024_a03_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Subproblems have a recognizable state or key that can be compared across contexts. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Subproblems have a recognizable state or key that can be compared across contexts."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Dynamic Programming", "one_liner": "Solve via subproblem reuse.", "page_ref": "prime:dynamic_programming", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Recognizable key -> state representation.", "slug": "dynamic_programming", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a well-defined state representation containing all information needed for a subproblem."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Recurring subproblems have a sufficient recognizable state or key.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Local solutions can be recombined into a larger solution without losing correctness or context fit.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The larger problem demands global coherence, while local actors or recursive processes repeatedly encounter subproblems that look local and disposable. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: Local solutions can be recombined into a larger solution without losing correctness or context fit. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Local solutions can be recombined into a larger solution without losing correctness or context fit.", "The larger problem demands global coherence, while local actors or recursive processes repeatedly encounter subproblems that look local and disposable."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Local solutions can be recombined into a larger solution without losing correctness or context fit."}, {"display_text": "Recomputation is costly, slow, inconsistent, error-prone, or politically contested.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Recomputation is costly, slow, inconsistent, error-prone, or politically contested. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Recomputation is costly, slow, inconsistent, error-prone, or politically contested."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Recomputation is costly, slow, inconsistent, error-prone, or politically contested."}, {"display_text": "Assumptions can be versioned or invalidated when the context changes.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: Assumptions can be versioned or invalidated when the context changes. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Assumptions can be versioned or invalidated when the context changes."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Assumptions can be versioned or invalidated when the context changes."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 24, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-024", "ledger_sha256": "0fec5317f30d34d75f29843acd71bce6a96b4eb45a29cdd4824323f3fc44300c"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Edge-Zone Interface Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:edge_zone_interface_design", "slug": "edge_zone_interface_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system treats a boundary between two regimes as a line or as a simple passage, but the boundary actually produces a distinct edge zone. Because the edge is not recognized as its own operating regime, its resident phenomena, risks, opportunities, and maintenance burdens are mismanaged by interior-oriented rules.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system treats a boundary between two regimes as a line or as a simple passage, but the boundary actually produces a distinct edge zone. Because the edge is not recognized as its own operating regime, its resident phenomena, risks, opportunities, and maintenance burdens are mismanaged by interior-oriented rules."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires two qualitatively different flanking regimes.", "role_mapping": "Flanking regimes -> regimes that meet.", "slug": "ecotone", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The exact record requires two extended regimes with different equilibrium values that abut.", "role_mapping": "Abutting interiors -> regimes that meet.", "slug": "edge_effect", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b024_a04_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Two or more regimes meet. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Two or more regimes meet"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Ecotone", "one_liner": "A transitional zone of measurable depth where two regimes overlap and mix, generating gradients, elevated exchange, and zone-specific structure that neither regime alone hosts.", "page_ref": "prime:ecotone", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Flanking regimes -> regimes that meet.", "slug": "ecotone", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires two qualitatively different flanking regimes."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Edge Effect", "one_liner": "Where two regimes meet, a thin high-gradient band forms a distinct third regime with its own resident phenomena, absent from either interior.", "page_ref": "prime:edge_effect", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Abutting interiors -> regimes that meet.", "slug": "edge_effect", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires two extended regimes with different equilibrium values that abut."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Two qualitatively different regimes meet.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A steep continuous gradient across a band of measurable depth is mandatory.", "role_mapping": "Gradient profile -> steep edge gradient.", "slug": "ecotone", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime requires a steepened gradient inside the finite transition band.", "role_mapping": "Steepened band gradient -> steep gradient.", "slug": "edge_effect", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b024_a04_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A steep gradient is present. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A steep gradient is present"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Ecotone", "one_liner": "A transitional zone of measurable depth where two regimes overlap and mix, generating gradients, elevated exchange, and zone-specific structure that neither regime alone hosts.", "page_ref": "prime:ecotone", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Gradient profile -> steep edge gradient.", "slug": "ecotone", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A steep continuous gradient across a band of measurable depth is mandatory."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Edge Effect", "one_liner": "Where two regimes meet, a thin high-gradient band forms a distinct third regime with its own resident phenomena, absent from either interior.", "page_ref": "prime:edge_effect", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Steepened band gradient -> steep gradient.", "slug": "edge_effect", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a steepened gradient inside the finite transition band."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A steep gradient exists across their meeting zone.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Zone-specific generative structure distinct from both regimes is mandatory.", "role_mapping": "Zone-specific structure -> edge phenomena.", "slug": "ecotone", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "Band-resident specialists and a distinct third regime are mandatory.", "role_mapping": "Band residents -> edge-specific phenomena.", "slug": "edge_effect", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b024_a04_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Edge-specific phenomena appear. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Edge-specific phenomena appear"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Ecotone", "one_liner": "A transitional zone of measurable depth where two regimes overlap and mix, generating gradients, elevated exchange, and zone-specific structure that neither regime alone hosts.", "page_ref": "prime:ecotone", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Zone-specific structure -> edge phenomena.", "slug": "ecotone", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Zone-specific generative structure distinct from both regimes is mandatory."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Edge Effect", "one_liner": "Where two regimes meet, a thin high-gradient band forms a distinct third regime with its own resident phenomena, absent from either interior.", "page_ref": "prime:edge_effect", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Band residents -> edge-specific phenomena.", "slug": "edge_effect", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Band-resident specialists and a distinct third regime are mandatory."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The zone hosts phenomena absent from either interior.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The band generates a third structure rather than merely separating the two interiors, so either interior description is insufficient.", "role_mapping": "Interior rules -> flanking regimes; underfit -> absent zone structure.", "slug": "ecotone", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The distinct band-resident regime is absent from either interior, so interior-only rules omit its dynamics.", "role_mapping": "Interior rules -> equilibrium interiors; underfit -> omitted nonlinear band response.", "slug": "edge_effect", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b024_a04_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Interior rules underfit the edge. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Interior rules underfit the edge"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Ecotone", "one_liner": "A transitional zone of measurable depth where two regimes overlap and mix, generating gradients, elevated exchange, and zone-specific structure that neither regime alone hosts.", "page_ref": "prime:ecotone", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Interior rules -> flanking regimes; underfit -> absent zone structure.", "slug": "ecotone", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The band generates a third structure rather than merely separating the two interiors, so either interior description is insufficient."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Edge Effect", "one_liner": "Where two regimes meet, a thin high-gradient band forms a distinct third regime with its own resident phenomena, absent from either interior.", "page_ref": "prime:edge_effect", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Interior rules -> equilibrium interiors; underfit -> omitted nonlinear band response.", "slug": "edge_effect", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The distinct band-resident regime is absent from either interior, so interior-only rules omit its dynamics."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Rules derived from either interior underfit the edge zone.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Cross-boundary flows matter.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Cross-boundary flows matter. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Cross-boundary flows matter"]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Cross-boundary flows matter"}, {"display_text": "The edge can be shaped.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: The edge can be shaped. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The edge can be shaped"]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The edge can be shaped"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 24, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-024", "ledger_sha256": "0fec5317f30d34d75f29843acd71bce6a96b4eb45a29cdd4824323f3fc44300c"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Editorial Independence Firewall", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:editorial_independence_firewall", "slug": "editorial_independence_firewall"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 4 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "An evaluation is made by an actor who depends on, fears, serves, is funded by, is embedded with, seeks access from, or is otherwise controllable by the parties affected by the evaluation. The judgment may therefore be softened, delayed, reframed, suppressed, overpraised, selectively informed, or treated as independent when it is actually captured.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "An evaluation is made by an actor who depends on, fears, serves, is funded by, is embedded with, seeks access from, or is otherwise controllable by the parties affected by the evaluation. The judgment may therefore be softened, delayed, reframed, suppressed, overpraised, selectively informed, or treated as independent when it is actually captured."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P036-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O9"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O10"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O11"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O12"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O13"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an actor who makes or supplies an evaluation as the dependency holder.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An evaluator is the dependent actor.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the dependency counterparty as one whose interests are affected by the evaluation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The dependency source is a party affected by the evaluator's evaluation.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve dependency directed from evaluator to affected party rather than the reverse.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The evaluator relies on the affected party.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must connect the dependency to the selected channel rather than generic social proximity.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The reliance concerns the selected channel supplied, controlled, or sustained by the affected party.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires the evaluator to rely on the affected party for funding.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The dependency channel is funding.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires the evaluator to rely on the affected party for access.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The dependency channel is access.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires the evaluator to rely on the affected party for data.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The dependency channel is data.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires the evaluator to rely on the affected party for employment.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The dependency channel is employment.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires the evaluator to rely on the affected party for sponsorship.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "The dependency channel is sponsorship.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires the evaluator to rely on the affected party for a future opportunity.", "obligation_id": "O10", "statement": "The dependency channel is future opportunity.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires the evaluator to rely on the affected party for legal clearance.", "obligation_id": "O11", "statement": "The dependency channel is legal clearance.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires the evaluator to rely on the affected party for platform support.", "obligation_id": "O12", "statement": "The dependency channel is platform support.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires the evaluator's reliance to arise through a personal relationship with the affected party.", "obligation_id": "O13", "statement": "The dependency channel is personal relationship.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "The evaluator relies on the affected party for funding, access, data, employment, sponsorship, future opportunity, legal clearance, platform support, or personal relationship.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An evaluator depends on the party affected by the evaluation through one selected dependency channel.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P036-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid editorial-independence instance blocks influence channels; it need not contain an active evaluator dependency.", "slug": "editorial_independence"}], "residual_id": "r:editorial_independence_firewall:b024_a05_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b024_a05_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Dependence creates both explicit and tacit pressure channels. In this condition set, the requirement is: The evaluator depends on the affected party for money, access, data, employment, clearance, support, or relationship.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The evaluator relies on the affected party for funding, access, data, employment, sponsorship, future opportunity, legal clearance, platform support, or personal relationship."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Holding the complete watchdog_journalism record and qualifier 'The monitored actor supplies advertising revenue that funds the evaluator.' fixed, I varied optional manifestations and found no complete instance that falsifies the selected DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Watchdog Journalism", "one_liner": "Model the press as an independent, adversarial monitor of the powerful whose exposures route to voters, regulators, or courts the monitored actor does not control — so its capacity reads off four structural elements and fails through capture or chilling effect.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:watchdog_journalism", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O3", "O4", "O5"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "monitored_actor_funds_evaluator_via_advertising", "predicate": "The monitored actor supplies advertising revenue that funds the evaluator.", "rationale": "The candidate supplies the structural spine; the emitted qualifier is one anchored, atomic, non-restating fact sufficient for a complete DNF branch."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "watchdog_journalism"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "monitored_actor_funds_evaluator_via_advertising"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "watchdog_journalism", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P036-C15-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record names advertising dependence on the monitored actor as a capture branch. One atomic dependency edge selects that branch without adding a second role or relation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The evaluator depends on the affected party for money, access, data, employment, clearance, support, or relationship.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P037-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the intervention holder as a party affected by the judgment under review.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The permitted actor is a party affected by the focal judgment.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require permission or authorized opportunity, not merely physical possibility or attempted access.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The affected party is allowed to exercise the intervention power.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve prerelease review by the affected party rather than another intervention mode.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The permitted intervention is review of the focal judgment.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve prerelease timing rather than review after publication or release.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The review occurs before the focal judgment is released.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "Affected parties are allowed to review the judgment before release.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An affected party is permitted to review a focal judgment before its release.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P037-C01-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P037-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the intervention holder as a party affected by the judgment being corrected.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The permitted actor is a party affected by the focal judgment.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require permission or authorized opportunity, not merely physical possibility or attempted access.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The affected party is allowed to exercise the intervention power.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve prerelease correction by the affected party rather than another intervention mode.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The permitted intervention is correction of the focal judgment.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve prerelease timing rather than correction after publication or release.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The correction occurs before the focal judgment is released.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "Affected parties are allowed to correct the judgment before release.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An affected party is permitted to correct a focal judgment before its release.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P037-C01-U2"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P037-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the intervention holder as a party affected by the judgment requiring clearance.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The permitted actor is a party affected by the focal judgment.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require permission or authorized opportunity, not merely physical possibility or attempted access.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The affected party is allowed to exercise the intervention power.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve clearance by the affected party as a prerelease condition rather than another intervention mode.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The permitted intervention is preclearance of the focal judgment.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve prerelease clearance timing rather than approval after publication or release.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The clearance occurs before the focal judgment is released.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "Affected parties are allowed to preclear the judgment before release.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An affected party is permitted to preclear a focal judgment before its release.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P037-C01-U3"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P037-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the delay power holder as a party affected by the judgment.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The permitted actor is a party affected by the focal judgment.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require permission or authorized opportunity, not merely physical possibility or attempted interference.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The affected party is allowed to exercise the intervention power.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve affected-party control over release timing rather than another intervention mode.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The permitted intervention is delaying release of the focal judgment.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve prerelease delay rather than a slowdown occurring after the judgment is released.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The intervention operates before and changes the judgment's release time.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "Affected parties are allowed to delay release of the judgment.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An affected party is permitted to delay release of a focal judgment.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P037-C01-U4"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P037-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the veto holder as a party affected by the judgment.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The permitted actor is a party affected by the focal judgment.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require permission or authorized opportunity, not merely physical possibility or attempted interference.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The affected party is allowed to exercise the intervention power.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an affected party's power to block release rather than another intervention mode.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The permitted intervention is vetoing release of the focal judgment.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve prerelease veto power rather than objection after publication or release.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The veto is exercisable before the focal judgment is released.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "Affected parties are allowed to veto release of the judgment.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An affected party is permitted to veto release of a focal judgment.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P037-C01-U5"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P037-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the framing power holder as a party affected by the judgment.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The permitted actor is a party affected by the focal judgment.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require permission or authorized opportunity, not merely physical possibility or attempted influence.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The affected party is allowed to exercise the intervention power.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve affected-party influence over framing rather than another intervention mode.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The permitted intervention is shaping the framing of the focal judgment.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve prerelease framing influence rather than commentary after publication or release.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The framing intervention occurs before the focal judgment is released.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "Affected parties are allowed to shape the framing of the judgment before release.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An affected party is permitted to shape the framing of a focal judgment before its release.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P037-C01-U6"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Detached verification requires path-cutting that prevents the interested party from reaching the verifier.", "slug": "journalistic_objectivity"}], "residual_id": "r:editorial_independence_firewall:b024_a05_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b024_a05_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Some factual review can be legitimate, but it requires a narrow correction-without-control design. In this condition set, the requirement is: Affected parties can preclear, delay, veto, correct, or frame the judgment before release.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Affected parties are allowed to review, correct, preclear, delay, veto, or shape framing before release."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 6, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 6}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Detached verification requires path-cutting that prevents the interested party from reaching the verifier.", "slug": "journalistic_objectivity"}], "normalized_requirement": "Affected parties can preclear, delay, veto, correct, or frame the judgment before release.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 6 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Affected parties can preclear, delay, veto, correct, or frame the judgment before release.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P037-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"], ["O1", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a conflict connected to the evaluation or judgment at issue.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A conflict bears on the focal evaluation.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires the conflict not to be disclosed to relevant evaluation users or overseers.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The conflict is undisclosed.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires absence of management or mitigation of the conflict bearing on the evaluation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The conflict is unmanaged.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "A conflict bearing on an evaluation is undisclosed or unmanaged.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A conflict bearing on a focal evaluation is either undisclosed or unmanaged.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P037-C02-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P037-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"], ["O1", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an ownership relation connected to the evaluation or judgment at issue.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An ownership tie bears on the focal evaluation.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires the ownership tie not to be disclosed to relevant evaluation users or overseers.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The ownership tie is undisclosed.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires absence of management or mitigation of the ownership tie bearing on the evaluation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The ownership tie is unmanaged.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "An ownership tie bearing on an evaluation is undisclosed or unmanaged.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An ownership tie bearing on a focal evaluation is either undisclosed or unmanaged.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P037-C02-U2"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P037-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"], ["O1", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a sponsor-imposed condition connected to the evaluation or judgment at issue.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A sponsor condition bears on the focal evaluation.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires the sponsor condition not to be disclosed to relevant evaluation users or overseers.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The sponsor condition is undisclosed.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires absence of management or mitigation of the sponsor condition bearing on the evaluation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The sponsor condition is unmanaged.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "A sponsor condition bearing on an evaluation is undisclosed or unmanaged.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A sponsor condition bearing on a focal evaluation is either undisclosed or unmanaged.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P037-C02-U3"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P037-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"], ["O1", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an access-for-conditions bargain connected to the evaluation or judgment at issue.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A source-access bargain bears on the focal evaluation.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires the source-access bargain not to be disclosed to relevant evaluation users or overseers.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The source-access bargain is undisclosed.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires absence of management or mitigation of the source-access bargain bearing on the evaluation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The source-access bargain is unmanaged.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "A source-access bargain bearing on an evaluation is undisclosed or unmanaged.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A source-access bargain bearing on a focal evaluation is either undisclosed or unmanaged.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P037-C02-U4"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P037-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"], ["O1", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an interest held by an evaluation reviewer and connected to the judgment at issue.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A reviewer interest bears on the focal evaluation.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires the reviewer interest not to be disclosed to relevant evaluation users or overseers.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The reviewer interest is undisclosed.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires absence of management or mitigation of the reviewer interest bearing on the evaluation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The reviewer interest is unmanaged.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "A reviewer interest bearing on an evaluation is undisclosed or unmanaged.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A reviewer interest bearing on a focal evaluation is either undisclosed or unmanaged.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P037-C02-U5"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Proximity capture explicitly lacks personal stake, bribery, or conflict of interest and therefore does not entail unmanaged conflicts.", "slug": "proximity_capture"}], "residual_id": "r:editorial_independence_firewall:b024_a05_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b024_a05_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Independence must address perceived and actual conflicts. In this condition set, the requirement is: Conflicts, ownership ties, sponsor conditions, access bargains, or reviewer interests are unmanaged.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Conflicts, ownership ties, sponsor conditions, source-access bargains, or reviewer interests are undisclosed or unmanaged."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 5, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 5}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Proximity capture explicitly lacks personal stake, bribery, or conflict of interest and therefore does not entail unmanaged conflicts.", "slug": "proximity_capture"}], "normalized_requirement": "Conflicts, ownership ties, sponsor conditions, access bargains, or reviewer interests are unmanaged.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 5 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Conflicts, ownership ties, sponsor conditions, access bargains, or reviewer interests are unmanaged.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P037-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an institution, rather than only an individual, as the actor claiming an impartial stance.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An institution is the actor making the focal claim.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the claiming institution as operating within the incentives, not merely observing them externally.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The institution operates inside an incentive environment.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve reward directed toward favorable evaluations or judgments rather than incentives with an unrelated target.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The incentives reward favorable judgments.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the while-contrast in the same institution rather than assign the claim and incentives to unrelated actors.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The impartiality claim coexists with the favorable-judgment incentives.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires an institutional claim of neutrality.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The institution claims neutrality.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires an institutional claim of independence.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The institution claims independence.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "An institution claims neutrality or independence while operating inside incentives that reward favorable judgments.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An institution claims one selected impartial stance while operating inside incentives that reward favorable judgments.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P037-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Motivated reasoning can occur without an institution, a neutrality claim, or incentives supplied by an affected party.", "slug": "motivated_reasoning"}], "residual_id": "r:editorial_independence_firewall:b024_a05_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b024_a05_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The pattern is especially useful when legitimacy depends on trust in independence. In this condition set, the requirement is: An institution claims neutrality while incentives reward favorable judgments.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The institution claims neutrality or independence while operating inside incentives that reward favorable judgments."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Motivated reasoning can occur without an institution, a neutrality claim, or incentives supplied by an affected party.", "slug": "motivated_reasoning"}], "normalized_requirement": "An institution claims neutrality while incentives reward favorable judgments.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "An institution claims neutrality while incentives reward favorable judgments.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A judgment can materially affect the reputation, access, revenue, rights, ranking, license, publication, sanction, or legitimacy of identifiable parties.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The affected party has motive to influence the judgment. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: A judgment can materially affect the reputation, access, revenue, rights, ranking, license, publication, sanction, or legitimacy of identifiable parties. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A judgment can materially affect the reputation, access, revenue, rights, ranking, license, publication, sanction, or legitimacy of identifiable parties.", "The affected party has motive to influence the judgment."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "A judgment can materially affect the reputation, access, revenue, rights, ranking, license, publication, sanction, or legitimacy of identifiable parties."}, {"display_text": "A challenge or appeal path is needed but could become an influence channel.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The design must allow contestability without surrendering judgment authority. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: A challenge or appeal path is needed but could become an influence channel. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A challenge or appeal path is needed but could become an influence channel.", "The design must allow contestability without surrendering judgment authority."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "A challenge or appeal path is needed but could become an influence channel."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 24, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-024", "ledger_sha256": "0fec5317f30d34d75f29843acd71bce6a96b4eb45a29cdd4824323f3fc44300c"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Effect Size Standardization", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:effect_size_standardization", "slug": "effect_size_standardization"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Evidence items report effects on different scales, units, denominators, populations, or statistical frames, making magnitude comparisons misleading or impossible.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Evidence items report effects on different scales, units, denominators, populations, or statistical frames, making magnitude comparisons misleading or impossible."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P037-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve comparison across at least two evidence holders rather than one isolated evidence item.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Multiple evidence holders are compared.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must admit studies, evaluations, and mixed study/evaluation sets in the shared evidence-holder role; it may not require holder-type homogeneity.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Each compared evidence holder is a study or an evaluation, and the holder set may contain either or both types.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require differing representations across the evidence holders rather than a shared scale.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The compared holders use different outcome representations.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This representation branch requires different outcome instruments across the compared holders.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The differing representations are outcome instruments.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This representation branch requires different measurement units across the compared holders.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The differing representations are measurement units.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This representation branch requires different model-coefficient scales across the compared holders.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The differing representations are model coefficients.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Studies or evaluations use different outcome instruments, units, or model coefficients.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Multiple evidence holders, each a study or evaluation and possibly mixed across those types, use different selected outcome representations.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P037-C04-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An effect size can be an unstandardized estimate from one instrument and one study, with no cross-scale incompatibility.", "slug": "effect_size"}], "residual_id": "r:effect_size_standardization:b024_a06_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b024_a06_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Studies or evaluations use different outcome instruments, units, or model coefficients. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Studies or evaluations use different outcome instruments, units, or model coefficients."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An effect size can be an unstandardized estimate from one instrument and one study, with no cross-scale incompatibility.", "slug": "effect_size"}], "normalized_requirement": "Studies use different instruments, units, or coefficient scales.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Studies use different instruments, units, or coefficient scales.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P037-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve decision-making actors, not merely an automated statistical report.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Decision makers are the actors weighting the evidence.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require excessive evidential weight on the selected cue rather than ordinary consideration.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The decision makers overweight the selected statistical cue.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve neglect of magnitude rather than merely imperfect magnitude estimation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The decision makers ignore effect magnitude.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the while-contrast rather than assign cue use and magnitude neglect to unrelated decisions.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Cue overweighting coexists with magnitude neglect in the same decision process.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires p-values to receive excessive decision weight.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The overweighted cue is a p-value.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires significance labels to receive excessive decision weight.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The overweighted cue is a significance label.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires effect direction to receive excessive decision weight.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The overweighted cue is direction of effect.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Decision makers overweight p-values, significance labels, or effect direction while ignoring magnitude.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Decision makers overweight one selected statistical cue while ignoring effect magnitude.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P037-C05-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Effect-size reporting can be used where nobody overweights significance or ignores magnitude.", "slug": "effect_size"}], "residual_id": "r:effect_size_standardization:b024_a06_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b024_a06_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Decision-makers are over-weighting p-values, significance labels, or direction of effect while ignoring magnitude. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Decision-makers are over-weighting p-values, significance labels, or direction of effect while ignoring magnitude."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Effect-size reporting can be used where nobody overweights significance or ignores magnitude.", "slug": "effect_size"}], "normalized_requirement": "Decision-makers overweight significance, p-values, or effect direction while ignoring magnitude.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Decision-makers overweight significance, p-values, or effect direction while ignoring magnitude.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P037-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve unstandardized or raw estimates as the objects whose interpretability and comparability are assessed.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Raw estimates are the compared evidence objects.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve substantive interpretability within each estimate's own local context.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The raw estimates are interpretable within their local settings.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require failed cross-axis comparability rather than merely difficult interpretation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The raw estimates are not comparable across the selected axis.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must apply both assessments to the same raw estimates rather than unrelated evidence sets.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Local interpretability contrasts with cross-axis non-comparability for the same estimates.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires non-comparability across populations.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The failed comparison is across populations.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires non-comparability across measurement instruments or measures.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The failed comparison is across measures.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires non-comparability across time periods.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The failed comparison is across time periods.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Raw estimates are interpretable locally but not comparable across populations, measures, or time periods.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "The same raw estimates are locally interpretable but not comparable across one selected axis.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P037-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An effect size can already be dimensionless and comparable, or can intentionally preserve substantive units within one context.", "slug": "effect_size"}], "residual_id": "r:effect_size_standardization:b024_a06_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b024_a06_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Raw estimates are interpretable locally but not comparable across populations, measures, or time periods. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Raw estimates are interpretable locally but not comparable across populations, measures, or time periods."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An effect size can already be dimensionless and comparable, or can intentionally preserve substantive units within one context.", "slug": "effect_size"}], "normalized_requirement": "Raw estimates are locally meaningful but not comparable across populations, measures, or periods.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Raw estimates are locally meaningful but not comparable across populations, measures, or periods.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A review, meta-analysis, dashboard, or policy comparison must compare effects across contexts.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Evidence items report effects on different scales, units, denominators, populations, or statistical frames, making magnitude comparisons misleading or impossible. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: A review, meta-analysis, dashboard, or policy comparison must compare effects across contexts. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A review, meta-analysis, dashboard, or policy comparison must compare effects across contexts.", "Evidence items report effects on different scales, units, denominators, populations, or statistical frames, making magnitude comparisons misleading or impossible."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "A review, meta-analysis, dashboard, or policy comparison must compare effects across contexts."}, {"display_text": "Magnitude must be connected to practical importance, cost-benefit judgment, or action thresholds.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: Magnitude must be connected to practical importance, cost-benefit judgment, or action thresholds. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Magnitude must be connected to practical importance, cost-benefit judgment, or action thresholds."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Magnitude must be connected to practical importance, cost-benefit judgment, or action thresholds."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 24, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-024", "ledger_sha256": "0fec5317f30d34d75f29843acd71bce6a96b4eb45a29cdd4824323f3fc44300c"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Effective-Input Delivery Assurance", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:effective_input_delivery_assurance", "slug": "effective_input_delivery_assurance"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system treats quantity supplied, dispatched, administered, published, allocated, or delivered to an upstream boundary as if it were quantity available for action, even though transport loss, degradation, diversion, transformation failure, access barriers, uptake limits, sequestration, timing mismatch, or clearance may leave only a small usable fraction at the target.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system treats quantity supplied, dispatched, administered, published, allocated, or delivered to an upstream boundary as if it were quantity available for action, even though transport loss, degradation, diversion, transformation failure, access barriers, uptake limits, sequestration, timing mismatch, or clearance may leave only a small usable fraction at the target."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P037-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a stated or supplied nominal input rather than only an effective target quantity.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A nominal input is the changing upstream quantity.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require an increase in nominal input rather than a constant or decreasing input.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The nominal input rises over the focal comparison.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a target-site response or effect as the output compared with nominal input.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A response at the target is the compared output.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require failed proportional scaling rather than a smaller but still constant response fraction.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The target response is not proportional to the rise in nominal input.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Nominal input rises without a proportional target response.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A rise in nominal input is not accompanied by a proportional response at the target.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P037-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A constant bioavailability fraction can yield a perfectly proportional target response despite intervening loss.", "slug": "bioavailability"}], "residual_id": "r:effective_input_delivery_assurance:b024_a07_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b024_a07_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Nominal input rises without proportional target response. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Nominal input rises without proportional target response."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "I varied optional manifestations within the complete mutual_aid_mismatch exact record and found no instance that falsifies the selected DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Mutual-aid mismatch", "one_liner": "The failure mode in which external support to an overwhelmed jurisdiction matches the gap in category but does not couple at the integration interface — wrong fittings, wrong radio plan, missing credentials, or post-peak arrival — so nominal aid yields no incremental capability.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:mutual_aid_mismatch", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "mutual_aid_mismatch"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "mutual_aid_mismatch", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P037-C07-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record directly requires more nominal aid to produce little or no usable local capability when the aid mismatches local constraints, which entails every obligation without qualification."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Holding the complete safety_stock_illusion exact record and qualifier 'The nominal buffer size increases over the focal comparison.' fixed, I varied optional manifestations and found no complete instance that falsifies the selected DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Safety-Stock Illusion", "one_liner": "Recognize that a buffer reported as adequate protection can be useless when disruption arrives, because effective protection is the weakest of five margins — size, location, composition, accessibility, and fit to the realised disruption — not the reported size alone.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:safety_stock_illusion", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2"], "guard_type": "TIMING_BINDING", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "nominal_buffer_size_increases", "predicate": "The nominal buffer size increases over the focal comparison.", "rationale": "The candidate supplies the structural spine; the emitted qualifier is one anchored, atomic, non-restating fact sufficient for a complete DNF branch."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "safety_stock_illusion"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "nominal_buffer_size_increases"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "safety_stock_illusion", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P037-C07-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires effective protection to be bottlenecked by the weakest readiness margin, so additional nominal stock can fail to improve protection. One timing-binding qualifier supplies the otherwise contingent increase in nominal buffer size."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_SYNTHESIS", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Holding the complete build_trap exact record and qualifier 'Nominal shipped output increases over the focal comparison.' fixed, I varied optional manifestations and found no complete instance that falsifies the selected DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Build Trap", "one_liner": "Diagnose a team that ships at high velocity yet moves no business outcome — because its measurement, calendar, and incentives are all set to what was built rather than to whether it mattered — by reading those three dials and asking what outcome the team owns.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:build_trap", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2"], "guard_type": "TIMING_BINDING", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "nominal_shipped_output_increases", "predicate": "Nominal shipped output increases over the focal comparison.", "rationale": "The candidate supplies the structural spine; the emitted qualifier is one anchored, atomic, non-restating fact sufficient for a complete DNF branch."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "build_trap"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "nominal_shipped_output_increases"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "build_trap", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P037-C07-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact build-trap record supplies output as the measured production signal and an unmoved business outcome, but sustained high velocity alone does not require a temporal rise. A single timing-binding qualifier supplies that rise and leaves the candidate to entail the failed response."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Nominal input increases without proportional target response.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires distinct administered, reached, and effective planes plus intervening loss stages.", "role_mapping": "Supply boundary -> administered plane; action locus -> effective plane; path -> loss stages.", "slug": "bioavailability", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b024_a07_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The path between supply and action contains multiple handoffs, barriers, transformations, stores, or competing sinks. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The path between supply and action contains multiple handoffs, barriers, transformations, stores, or competing sinks."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Bioavailability", "one_liner": "The fraction of what is supplied that arrives, in usable form, at the locus where it acts.", "page_ref": "prime:bioavailability", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Supply boundary -> administered plane; action locus -> effective plane; path -> loss stages.", "slug": "bioavailability", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires distinct administered, reached, and effective planes plus intervening loss stages."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Supply and action are separated by multiple handoffs, barriers, transformations, stores, or sinks.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A conversion fraction strictly below one and loss stages that consume input without effect are mandatory.", "role_mapping": "Unusable forms -> consumed input; usable target amount -> effective fraction.", "slug": "bioavailability", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b024_a07_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A useful input can exist in inactive, bound, inaccessible, degraded, mistimed, or off-target forms. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A useful input can exist in inactive, bound, inaccessible, degraded, mistimed, or off-target forms."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Bioavailability", "one_liner": "The fraction of what is supplied that arrives, in usable form, at the locus where it acts.", "page_ref": "prime:bioavailability", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Unusable forms -> consumed input; usable target amount -> effective fraction.", "slug": "bioavailability", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A conversion fraction strictly below one and loss stages that consume input without effect are mandatory."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Some supplied input is inactive, bound, inaccessible, degraded, mistimed, or off target.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P037-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the usable or effective fraction of a nominal input as the output being compared.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Effective fractions are the varying outputs.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve direction from axis variation to effective-fraction variation rather than mere association.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Differences along the selected axis produce differences in effective fraction.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a materially consequential difference rather than a negligible numerical variation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The resulting effective fractions differ materially.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires different routes to produce materially different effective fractions.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The selected delivery axis is route.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires different forms to produce materially different effective fractions.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The selected delivery axis is form.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires different recipients to produce materially different effective fractions.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The selected delivery axis is recipient.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires different contexts to produce materially different effective fractions.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The selected delivery axis is context.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Different routes, forms, recipients, or contexts produce materially different effective fractions.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Differences along one selected delivery axis produce materially different effective fractions.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P037-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A bioavailability instance can involve one route, form, recipient, and context with one fixed conversion fraction.", "slug": "bioavailability"}], "residual_id": "r:effective_input_delivery_assurance:b024_a07_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b024_a07_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Different routes, forms, recipients, or contexts produce materially different effective fractions. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Different routes, forms, recipients, or contexts produce materially different effective fractions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A bioavailability instance can involve one route, form, recipient, and context with one fixed conversion fraction.", "slug": "bioavailability"}], "normalized_requirement": "Different routes, forms, recipients, or contexts produce different effective fractions.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Different routes, forms, recipients, or contexts produce different effective fractions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Target-site measurement is difficult, so upstream delivery is used as a proxy.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The system needs enough usable input at the target to act, but the easiest observable and controllable quantity is usually upstream supply; optimizing that proxy can conceal delivery loss and shift burden to non-target locations. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Target-site measurement is difficult, so upstream delivery is used as a proxy. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Target-site measurement is difficult, so upstream delivery is used as a proxy.", "The system needs enough usable input at the target to act, but the easiest observable and controllable quantity is usually upstream supply; optimizing that proxy can conceal delivery loss and shift burden to non-target locations."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Target-site measurement is difficult, so upstream delivery is used as a proxy."}, {"display_text": "Compensatory oversupply creates waste, congestion, toxicity, inequity, or accumulated burden.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Compensatory oversupply creates waste, congestion, toxicity, inequity, or accumulated burden. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Compensatory oversupply creates waste, congestion, toxicity, inequity, or accumulated burden."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Compensatory oversupply creates waste, congestion, toxicity, inequity, or accumulated burden."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 24, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-024", "ledger_sha256": "0fec5317f30d34d75f29843acd71bce6a96b4eb45a29cdd4824323f3fc44300c"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": [{"groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_GUARDED_EQUIVALENT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Holding the complete progress_illusion exact record and qualifier 'In the focal delivery system, the counted activity signal is upstream delivery and the hard-to-measure outcome construct is target-site quantity.' fixed, I varied optional manifestations and found no complete instance that falsifies the selected DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Progress Illusion", "one_liner": "Mistake high activity — story points closed, artifacts shipped, papers published — for progress toward a goal, a proxy substitution in which an easy-to-count activity signal stands in for a rare, hard-to-measure outcome construct because the activity really is tracking something, just not the goal.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:progress_illusion", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1", "O3"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "upstream_delivery_target_site_outcome_pair", "predicate": "In the focal delivery system, the counted activity signal is upstream delivery and the hard-to-measure outcome construct is target-site quantity.", "rationale": "The candidate supplies the structural spine; the emitted qualifier is one anchored, atomic, non-restating fact sufficient for a complete DNF branch."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "progress_illusion"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "upstream_delivery_target_site_outcome_pair"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "progress_illusion", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P037-C08-U1", "why_it_fits": "Progress illusion directly requires a hard-to-measure target outcome to be represented by an easier activity count. The single domain restriction binds that existing proxy-target pair to upstream delivery and target-site quantity."}], "publication_role": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT_ONLY", "source_residual_occurrence_id": "r:effective_input_delivery_assurance:b024_a07_c4", "unit": {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P037-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the intended measurement object at the target rather than an arbitrary hidden variable.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The hard-to-measure object is a quantity at the target site.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require measurement difficulty at the target, not merely a preference for cheaper upstream data.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Direct measurement at the target site is difficult.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve upstream delivery or supply as the substitute measurement.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Upstream delivery is the observed proxy quantity.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the directed proxy-for relation from upstream delivery to target-site availability or response.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Upstream delivery is used as a proxy for the target-site quantity.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the source's so-direction rather than merely co-locate measurement difficulty and proxy use.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Target-site measurement difficulty motivates use of the upstream proxy.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Target-site measurement is difficult, so upstream delivery is used as its proxy.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Difficulty measuring the target-site quantity causes upstream delivery to be used as its proxy.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P037-C08-U1"}}]}
{"archetype": {"name": "Effort-Based Vs. Inherent Ability Attribution", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:effort_based_vs_inherent_ability_attribution", "slug": "effort_based_vs_inherent_ability_attribution"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 4, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 4 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 1 of 4 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Performance outcomes are overinterpreted as evidence of inherent ability, identity, or stable competence before the system has separated effort, strategy, practice history, task difficulty, context, luck, and evidence quality. This produces both inflated confidence after lucky or easy success and premature discouragement after early failure.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Performance outcomes are overinterpreted as evidence of inherent ability, identity, or stable competence before the system has separated effort, strategy, practice history, task difficulty, context, luck, and evidence quality. This produces both inflated confidence after lucky or easy success and premature discouragement after early failure."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P037-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an actor who forms the ability judgment rather than only a passive subject of evaluation.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A selected actor is the ability-conclusion drawer.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve observed performance episodes as the evidence used for the ability conclusion.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Performance episodes are the evidence base.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve sparse performance evidence rather than a broad longitudinal record.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The evidence base contains only a small number of performance episodes.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve generalization from the sparse episodes to broad ability rather than a narrow episode-specific judgment.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The actor draws a broad ability conclusion from those episodes.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a learner to draw the broad ability conclusion.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The conclusion drawer is a learner.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a novice to draw the broad ability conclusion.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The conclusion drawer is a novice.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a team to draw the broad ability conclusion.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The conclusion drawer is a team.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires an evaluator to draw the broad ability conclusion.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The conclusion drawer is an evaluator.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "A learner, novice, team, or evaluator draws a broad ability conclusion from a small number of performance episodes.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "One selected actor type infers broad ability from a small number of performance episodes.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P037-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Dunning-Kruger can be measured across many performance episodes and concerns self-assessment calibration, not necessarily inherent-ability inference.", "slug": "dunning_kruger_effect"}], "residual_id": "r:effort_based_vs_inherent_ability_attribution:b024_a08_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b024_a08_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A learner, novice, team, or evaluator draws a broad ability conclusion from a small number of performance episodes. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A learner, novice, team, or evaluator draws a broad ability conclusion from a small number of performance episodes."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Dunning-Kruger can be measured across many performance episodes and concerns self-assessment calibration, not necessarily inherent-ability inference.", "slug": "dunning_kruger_effect"}], "normalized_requirement": "A broad ability conclusion is drawn from few performance episodes.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A broad ability conclusion is drawn from few performance episodes.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P037-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve experienced success rather than failure or a merely predicted outcome.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A success episode is the focal antecedent.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the success-before-feedback-sufficiency ordering, allowing some feedback but not enough corrective feedback.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The success occurs before sufficient corrective feedback has been received.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve inflated competence confidence in the specified style rather than generic positive affect.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Dunning-Kruger-style overconfidence is the resulting state.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the directed causal relation rather than mere temporal co-occurrence.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The early success under insufficient corrective feedback creates the overconfidence.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Success occurs before enough corrective feedback has been received, creating Dunning-Kruger-style overconfidence.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Success before sufficient corrective feedback causes Dunning-Kruger-style overconfidence.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P037-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact effect requires low competence to impair metacognitive access; it does not require an early success episode or missing feedback.", "slug": "dunning_kruger_effect"}], "residual_id": "r:effort_based_vs_inherent_ability_attribution:b024_a08_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b024_a08_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Success occurs before enough corrective feedback has been received, creating Dunning-Kruger-style overconfidence. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Success occurs before enough corrective feedback has been received, creating Dunning-Kruger-style overconfidence."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact effect requires low competence to impair metacognitive access; it does not require an early success episode or missing feedback.", "slug": "dunning_kruger_effect"}], "normalized_requirement": "Early success before corrective feedback produces Dunning-Kruger-style overconfidence.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Early success before corrective feedback produces Dunning-Kruger-style overconfidence.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P037-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6", "O7", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve failure or poor performance as the evidence being interpreted.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A failure episode is the interpreted evidence.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve conclusive epistemic force, not merely a possibility of lower ability.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The failure is treated as proof rather than tentative evidence.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an inability characterized as stable or fixed rather than a temporary performance deficit.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The asserted conclusion is fixed inability.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the rather-than relation across the complete set, not merely displace one alternative while retaining another as the operative interpretation.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The fixed-inability interpretation substitutes for treating failure as information about every listed changeable or contextual alternative.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve strategy as one jointly displaced informational interpretation of failure.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Failure is not treated as information about strategy.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve preparation as one jointly displaced informational interpretation of failure.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "Failure is not treated as information about preparation.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve task fit as one jointly displaced informational interpretation of failure.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "Failure is not treated as information about task fit.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve support needs as one jointly displaced informational interpretation of failure.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "Failure is not treated as information about support needs.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Failure is treated as proof of fixed inability rather than information about strategy, preparation, task fit, or support needs.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Failure is interpreted as proof of fixed inability rather than as information about any of strategy, preparation, task fit, or support needs.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P037-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Responsibility attribution can correctly assign a controllable action and need not infer fixed inability from failure.", "slug": "responsibility_attribution"}], "residual_id": "r:effort_based_vs_inherent_ability_attribution:b024_a08_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b024_a08_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Failure is interpreted as proof of fixed inability rather than as information about strategy, preparation, task fit, or support needs. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Failure is interpreted as proof of fixed inability rather than as information about strategy, preparation, task fit, or support needs."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Responsibility attribution can correctly assign a controllable action and need not infer fixed inability from failure.", "slug": "responsibility_attribution"}], "normalized_requirement": "Failure is treated as proof of fixed inability rather than evidence about strategy, preparation, fit, or support.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Failure is treated as proof of fixed inability rather than evidence about strategy, preparation, fit, or support.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P037-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an actor's own performance outcome as the object of self-interpretation.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The focal actor has a performance outcome.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve performance sensitivity to the selected factor rather than stable performance across it.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Performance varies with the selected contingent factor.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve attribution of the outcome to a stable fact about the self rather than an episode-specific judgment.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The actor treats the performance outcome as a stable self-diagnosis.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must apply the stable interpretation and contingent variation to the same actor and performance outcome.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The stable self-diagnosis contrasts with the outcome's contingent variability.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires performance variation with luck.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Performance varies with luck.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires performance variation with context.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "Performance varies with context.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires performance variation with task difficulty.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "Performance varies with task difficulty.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires performance variation with support whose contribution is hidden.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "Performance varies with hidden support.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Performance varies with luck, context, task difficulty, or hidden support, but the actor treats the outcome as a stable self-diagnosis.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Performance varies with one selected contingent factor, yet the actor treats its outcome as a stable self-diagnosis.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P037-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact bias primarily overweights dispositions for other people's behavior and explicitly makes self-attribution less biased or opposite.", "slug": "fundamental_attribution_error"}], "residual_id": "r:effort_based_vs_inherent_ability_attribution:b024_a08_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b024_a08_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Performance varies with luck, context, task difficulty, or hidden support, but the actor treats the outcome as a stable self-diagnosis. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Performance varies with luck, context, task difficulty, or hidden support, but the actor treats the outcome as a stable self-diagnosis."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Holding the complete self_serving_bias exact record and qualifier 'The success credited to stable ability is actually luck-sensitive.' fixed, I varied optional manifestations and found no complete instance that falsifies the selected DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Self-Serving Bias", "one_liner": "The directional asymmetry by which agents credit their own successes to internal factors (ability, effort) and blame failures on external ones (luck, circumstance) to protect self-image — making any self-report about one's own outcome a biased evidence class with a known lean.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:self_serving_bias", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "success_credited_to_ability_is_luck_sensitive", "predicate": "The success credited to stable ability is actually luck-sensitive.", "rationale": "The candidate supplies the structural spine; the emitted qualifier is one anchored, atomic, non-restating fact sufficient for a complete DNF branch."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "self_serving_bias"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "success_credited_to_ability_is_luck_sensitive"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "self_serving_bias", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P037-C14-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record contains the actor's success-to-internal-ability attribution and names luck as the external causal locus assigned asymmetrically. One causal-attribution mismatch selects the luck branch and states that the same success is luck-sensitive; it does not restate the general head."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Holding the complete impostor_syndrome exact record and qualifier 'The focal successes vary with context.' fixed, I varied optional manifestations and found no complete instance that falsifies the selected DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Impostor Syndrome", "one_liner": "The pattern in which a demonstrably capable, externally-validated person keeps a private conviction that their competence is fake, because a non-updating self-assessment channel rereads each new success as proof the deception still works rather than as evidence of ability.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:impostor_syndrome", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2", "O4", "O6"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "focal_successes_vary_with_context", "predicate": "The focal successes vary with context.", "rationale": "The candidate supplies the structural spine; the emitted qualifier is one anchored, atomic, non-restating fact sufficient for a complete DNF branch."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "impostor_syndrome"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "focal_successes_vary_with_context"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "impostor_syndrome", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P037-C14-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires successes to be absorbed into a stable fraud self-model rather than updating it. One variation fact on those existing success outcomes selects the context branch and completes the contrast."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Performance varies with context, difficulty, luck, or support but becomes a stable self-diagnosis.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "DISJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Feedback language emphasizes talent, genius, natural ability, stupidity, or incapacity more than controllable process and evidence.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Performance outcomes are overinterpreted as evidence of inherent ability, identity, or stable competence before the system has separated effort, strategy, practice history, task difficulty, context, luck, and evidence quality. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Feedback language emphasizes talent, genius, natural ability, stupidity, or incapacity more than controllable process and evidence. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Feedback language emphasizes talent, genius, natural ability, stupidity, or incapacity more than controllable process and evidence.", "Performance outcomes are overinterpreted as evidence of inherent ability, identity, or stable competence before the system has separated effort, strategy, practice history, task difficulty, context, luck, and evidence quality."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Feedback language emphasizes talent, genius, natural ability, stupidity, or incapacity more than controllable process and evidence."}, {"display_text": "The system wants to maintain motivation and agency without giving false reassurance or ignoring real skill gaps.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: The system wants to maintain motivation and agency without giving false reassurance or ignoring real skill gaps. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The system wants to maintain motivation and agency without giving false reassurance or ignoring real skill gaps."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The system wants to maintain motivation and agency without giving false reassurance or ignoring real skill gaps."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 24, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-024", "ledger_sha256": "0fec5317f30d34d75f29843acd71bce6a96b4eb45a29cdd4824323f3fc44300c"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Elastic Capacity Scaling", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:elastic_capacity_scaling", "slug": "elastic_capacity_scaling"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is capacity mismatch under variable demand. The system is sized for a normal, average, historical, or politically convenient demand level, but real demand does not stay there. Peaks overwhelm the system. Valleys expose waste.\n\nWhen the system is under-provisioned, users wait, queues grow, staff burn out, deadlines slip, incident risk rises, and quality falls. When the system is over-provisioned, resources sit idle, costs rise, and managers may cut capacity in ways that leave the system vulnerable to the next peak. The same system can suffer both problems in alternating cycles.\n\nThe deeper problem is that capacity decisions are often episodic while demand variation is continuous. A budget is set once per year. A staffing level is approved once per quarter. A facility is opened or closed slowly. A technical system is configured for yesterday's load. Elastic Capacity Scaling converts capacity into a managed state variable with explicit rules for changing it.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "The system faces demand that changes over time, but its active capacity is fixed, slow to adjust, or adjusted only through improvised crisis response. As a result, peaks produce overload, queues, latency, quality loss, safety risk, or burnout, while valleys produce idle resources, unnecessary cost, and political pressure to cut capacity that may be needed again."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires variance in arrivals or service over a timescale on which capacity cannot flex.", "role_mapping": "Demand variation -> arrival or service variance.", "slug": "unevenness_waste", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The exact record requires multiple time-varying demands whose tail peaks co-occur under a common stressor.", "role_mapping": "Demand series -> consumer loads; material variation -> correlated peaks.", "slug": "correlated_capacity_demand", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b024_a09_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Demand, traffic, caseload, orders, utilization, patients, calls, tickets, incidents, or enrollment varies materially over time. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Demand, traffic, caseload, orders, utilization, patients, calls, tickets, incidents, or enrollment varies materially over time."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Unevenness Waste", "one_liner": "Variance in arrivals or service through finite shared capacity imposes its own cost — additive to the cost of the mean and rising nonlinearly near the capacity ceiling — so capacity sized to mean demand is not capacity adequate to demand.", "page_ref": "prime:unevenness_waste", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Demand variation -> arrival or service variance.", "slug": "unevenness_waste", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires variance in arrivals or service over a timescale on which capacity cannot flex."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Correlated Capacity Demand", "one_liner": "When demands on a shared finite resource are tail-correlated rather than independent, capacity sized for independent peaks fails at the rare joint exceedance.", "page_ref": "prime:correlated_capacity_demand", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Demand series -> consumer loads; material variation -> correlated peaks.", "slug": "correlated_capacity_demand", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires multiple time-varying demands whose tail peaks co-occur under a common stressor."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Demand through shared capacity varies materially over time.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P037-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the same system across overload, underutilization, and range comparison.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "One focal system occupies the compared operating states.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require temporal movement between states rather than simultaneous heterogeneity across unrelated components.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The system alternates over time between opposed operating states.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve periods in which demand or load exceeds usable capacity.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "One required state is overload.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve periods in which usable capacity is materially idle or underused.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The other required state is underutilization.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the sustainable-range baseline and the system's failure to remain near it.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The alternation occurs instead of staying near a sustainable operating range.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "The system alternates between overload and underutilization rather than staying near a sustainable operating range.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "The same system alternates between overload and underutilization instead of remaining near a sustainable operating range.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P037-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Unevenness waste may be paid entirely as queues or rejected work without observed underutilization valleys.", "slug": "unevenness_waste"}], "residual_id": "r:elastic_capacity_scaling:b024_a09_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b024_a09_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The system alternates between overload and underutilization rather than staying near a sustainable operating range. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The system alternates between overload and underutilization rather than staying near a sustainable operating range."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Unevenness waste may be paid entirely as queues or rejected work without observed underutilization valleys.", "slug": "unevenness_waste"}], "normalized_requirement": "The system alternates between overload and underutilization.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The system alternates between overload and underutilization.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record says variance cost must be paid as idle reserve, queue, or rejected work and that mean-sized capacity is inadequate.", "role_mapping": "Peak capacity -> idle reserve; baseline capacity -> queue or rejection at peaks.", "slug": "unevenness_waste", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b024_a09_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Holding peak capacity all the time would be wasteful, but holding only baseline capacity would create unacceptable peak failure. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Holding peak capacity all the time would be wasteful, but holding only baseline capacity would create unacceptable peak failure."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Unevenness Waste", "one_liner": "Variance in arrivals or service through finite shared capacity imposes its own cost — additive to the cost of the mean and rising nonlinearly near the capacity ceiling — so capacity sized to mean demand is not capacity adequate to demand.", "page_ref": "prime:unevenness_waste", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Peak capacity -> idle reserve; baseline capacity -> queue or rejection at peaks.", "slug": "unevenness_waste", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record says variance cost must be paid as idle reserve, queue, or rejected work and that mean-sized capacity is inadequate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Peak-always capacity wastes resources while baseline-only capacity creates unacceptable peak failure.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Capacity can be added or removed in identifiable increments, even if those increments have lead time, cost, or governance constraints.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The increment does not need to be instantaneous, but its lead time must fit the demand pattern or be staged predictively. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: Capacity can be added or removed in identifiable increments, even if those increments have lead time, cost, or governance constraints. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Capacity can be added or removed in identifiable increments, even if those increments have lead time, cost, or governance constraints.", "The increment does not need to be instantaneous, but its lead time must fit the demand pattern or be staged predictively."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Capacity can be added or removed in identifiable increments, even if those increments have lead time, cost, or governance constraints."}, {"display_text": "Performance targets, safety coverage, wait times, latency, backlog age, or service quality depend on matching capacity to changing load.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "As a result, peaks produce overload, queues, latency, quality loss, safety risk, or burnout, while valleys produce idle resources, unnecessary cost, and political pressure to cut capacity that may be needed again. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Performance targets, safety coverage, wait times, latency, backlog age, or service quality depend on matching capacity to changing load. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Performance targets, safety coverage, wait times, latency, backlog age, or service quality depend on matching capacity to changing load.", "As a result, peaks produce overload, queues, latency, quality loss, safety risk, or burnout, while valleys produce idle resources, unnecessary cost, and political pressure to cut capacity that may be needed again."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Performance targets, safety coverage, wait times, latency, backlog age, or service quality depend on matching capacity to changing load."}, {"display_text": "Current scaling decisions are informal, late, politically contested, excessively expensive, or based on incomplete demand signals.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The deeper problem is that capacity decisions are often episodic while demand variation is continuous. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Current scaling decisions are informal, late, politically contested, excessively expensive, or based on incomplete demand signals. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Current scaling decisions are informal, late, politically contested, excessively expensive, or based on incomplete demand signals.", "The deeper problem is that capacity decisions are often episodic while demand variation is continuous."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Current scaling decisions are informal, late, politically contested, excessively expensive, or based on incomplete demand signals."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 24, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-024", "ledger_sha256": "0fec5317f30d34d75f29843acd71bce6a96b4eb45a29cdd4824323f3fc44300c"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": [{"groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Holding the complete scale_before_fit exact record and qualifier 'The focal scale commitment in the current case is a manufacturing-capacity expansion.' fixed, I varied optional manifestations and found no complete instance that falsifies the selected DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Scale-Before-Fit", "one_liner": "Diagnose a venture's failure as one of ordering — committing substantial growth investment before demonstrating repeatable, unsubsidised demand — by asking whether the evidence at the moment of commitment justified the cost base it locked in.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:scale_before_fit", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "current_scale_commitment_is_manufacturing_capacity_expansion", "predicate": "The focal scale commitment in the current case is a manufacturing-capacity expansion.", "rationale": "The candidate supplies the structural spine; the emitted qualifier is one anchored, atomic, non-restating fact sufficient for a complete DNF branch."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "scale_before_fit"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "current_scale_commitment_is_manufacturing_capacity_expansion"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "scale_before_fit", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P038-C01-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record universally supplies an evidence-premature scale commitment, but its listed manifestations include growth investments that need not adjust system capacity. One current-case subtype binding selects manufacturing-capacity expansion and completes the incomplete-demand-signals branch."}], "publication_role": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT_ONLY", "source_residual_occurrence_id": "r:elastic_capacity_scaling:b024_a09_c6", "unit": {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P038-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"], ["O1", "O3"], ["O1", "O4"], ["O1", "O5"], ["O1", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an operative capacity-scaling decision, not a generic planning choice or capacity state.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A focal current decision concerns adjustment of system capacity.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve lack of formal decision procedure or governance for the current scaling decision.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The capacity-scaling decision is informal.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve lateness of the scaling decision relative to when capacity adjustment is needed.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The capacity-scaling decision occurs late.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve political contestation over the scaling decision, not ordinary technical disagreement alone.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The capacity-scaling decision is politically contested.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve scaling-decision cost beyond the relevant acceptable level, not merely nonzero cost.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The capacity-scaling decision is excessively expensive.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve an information basis that omits material demand information used by the scaling decision.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The capacity-scaling decision is based on incomplete demand signals.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Current capacity-scaling decisions have at least one listed governance, cost, timing, or information defect.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A current capacity-scaling decision has one listed defect.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P038-C01-U1"}}]}
{"archetype": {"name": "Elasticity-Based Leverage", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:elasticity_based_leverage", "slug": "elasticity_based_leverage"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 3, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 3 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is heterogeneous responsiveness. Some actors or flows can change behavior easily; others cannot. Some moments are highly sensitive to small changes; others require structural capacity, rights protection, trust, or direct support.\n\nIf the system ignores this variation, it may overburden low-choice actors, overpay people who would have acted anyway, miss high-leverage friction points, or celebrate a metric shift that only displaced the problem elsewhere.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Different behaviors, actors, groups, time windows, flows, or decision points respond differently to changes in price, cost, effort, friction, reward, or access, but the system applies uniform pressure or targets visible volume rather than responsiveness. Resources are spent where change is least likely, while high-leverage response points remain underused."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P038-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the same intervention across the comparison rather than comparing different interventions.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "One focal intervention is applied or considered across the compared contexts.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve multiple contexts with at least one in each response-magnitude side of the comparison.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "At least two distinct contexts are compared.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a high-magnitude response caused by the focal intervention in one compared context.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The intervention produces a large change in at least one context.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a low-magnitude response caused by the same intervention in a different compared context.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The intervention produces little change in at least one other context.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the cross-context large-versus-little contrast, not merely context-specific variation of unspecified size.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The response magnitude differs sharply across those contexts.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "The same intervention produces large change in some contexts and little change in others.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "One intervention produces sharply different response magnitudes across contexts.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P038-C02-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "One elasticity can describe one stimulus-response pair at one operating point and need not compare responsiveness across contexts.", "slug": "elasticity"}], "residual_id": "r:elasticity_based_leverage:b024_a10_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b024_a10_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Some actors or flows can change behavior easily; others cannot. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The same intervention produces large change in some contexts and little change in others.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The same intervention produces large change in some contexts and little change in others.", "Some actors or flows can change behavior easily; others cannot."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Holding the complete sequential_compliance_technique exact record and qualifier 'The sequence-versus-cold compliance contrast is sharply large-versus-little.' fixed, I varied optional manifestations and found no complete instance that falsifies the selected DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Sequential Compliance Technique", "one_liner": "A requester deliberately stages an initial request or response-producing interaction so that its acceptance, refusal, or apparent concession changes the target's state and raises compliance with a later target request above the rate the later request would obtain alone.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:sequential_compliance_technique", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O3", "O4", "O5"], "guard_type": "THRESHOLD_CROSSING", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "sharp_sequence_compliance_contrast", "predicate": "The sequence-versus-cold compliance contrast is sharply large-versus-little.", "rationale": "The candidate supplies the structural spine; the emitted qualifier is one anchored, atomic, non-restating fact sufficient for a complete DNF branch."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "sequential_compliance_technique"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "sharp_sequence_compliance_contrast"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "sequential_compliance_technique", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P038-C02-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires a same-request comparison and a reliable sequence lift, but that lift can be modest. One threshold fact on the existing contrast makes one response large, the other little, and their magnitude difference sharp."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The same intervention produces large change in some contexts and little change in others.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "Intervention effort is currently allocated away from the most responsive available target or decision point.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Intervention effort is currently allocated away from the most responsive available target or decision point.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P038-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the same behavior as the visible, high-volume object of possible intervention.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "One focal behavior is both visible and high-volume.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve targeting attraction attached to the focal behavior, not mere visibility or volume.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "That behavior is tempting to select as an intervention target.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the possibility modality and must not require that the limitation has already been established.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The source asserts a possible, not necessarily actual, responsiveness limit.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve the possibility that the focal behavior responds little to the contemplated pressure.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The possible responsiveness limit is inelasticity.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve the possibility that a structural constraint limits change in the focal behavior.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The possible responsiveness limit is a structural constraint.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A visible high-volume behavior is tempting to target even though it may be inelastic or structurally constrained.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A salient high-volume target may have one listed limit on responsiveness.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P038-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Elasticity can be high, and its exact record contains no visibility or targeting error.", "slug": "elasticity"}], "residual_id": "r:elasticity_based_leverage:b024_a10_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b024_a10_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A visible high-volume behavior is tempting to target, but it may be inelastic or constrained. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A visible high-volume behavior is tempting to target, but it may be inelastic or constrained."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Elasticity can be high, and its exact record contains no visibility or targeting error.", "slug": "elasticity"}], "normalized_requirement": "A visible high-volume target is tempting but inelastic or structurally constrained.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A visible high-volume target is tempting but inelastic or structurally constrained.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "Intervention effort is currently allocated away from the most responsive available target or decision point.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Intervention effort is currently allocated away from the most responsive available target or decision point.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The unit-free response-to-stimulus ratio classifies a regime as elastic when fractional response exceeds fractional stimulus.", "role_mapping": "Small lever change -> fractional stimulus; outsized effect -> elastic fractional response.", "slug": "elasticity", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b024_a10_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Small changes in convenience, price, timing, or default appear to produce outsized effects. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Small changes in convenience, price, timing, or default appear to produce outsized effects."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Elasticity", "one_liner": "The unit-free ratio of a fractional response to a fractional stimulus.", "page_ref": "prime:elasticity", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Small lever change -> fractional stimulus; outsized effect -> elastic fractional response.", "slug": "elasticity", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The unit-free response-to-stimulus ratio classifies a regime as elastic when fractional response exceeds fractional stimulus."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A small fractional change in a lever produces an outsized fractional response.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "Intervention effort is currently allocated away from the most responsive available target or decision point.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Intervention effort is currently allocated away from the most responsive available target or decision point.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Limited budget, attention, enforcement, support, or capacity must be allocated among several possible behavior-change targets.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when intervention capacity is limited and different targets respond differently to the same kind of pressure. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: Limited budget, attention, enforcement, support, or capacity must be allocated among several possible behavior-change targets. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Limited budget, attention, enforcement, support, or capacity must be allocated among several possible behavior-change targets.", "Use this archetype when intervention capacity is limited and different targets respond differently to the same kind of pressure."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "Limited budget, attention, enforcement, support, or capacity must be allocated among several possible behavior-change targets."}, {"display_text": "Demand, workload, resource use, or participation must shift across time, channel, or option rather than simply be suppressed.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful for demand management, participation, adoption, scheduling, access, service use, operational load, and behavior change. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: Demand, workload, resource use, or participation must shift across time, channel, or option rather than simply be suppressed. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Demand, workload, resource use, or participation must shift across time, channel, or option rather than simply be suppressed.", "It is especially useful for demand management, participation, adoption, scheduling, access, service use, operational load, and behavior change."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Demand, workload, resource use, or participation must shift across time, channel, or option rather than simply be suppressed."}, {"display_text": "Existing incentives or communications are too broad, costly, or blunt.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Existing incentives or communications are too broad, costly, or blunt. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Existing incentives or communications are too broad, costly, or blunt."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Existing incentives or communications are too broad, costly, or blunt."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 24, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-024", "ledger_sha256": "0fec5317f30d34d75f29843acd71bce6a96b4eb45a29cdd4824323f3fc44300c"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": [{"groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "I varied optional manifestations within the complete rules_of_engagement_ambiguity exact record and found no instance that falsifies the selected DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Rules-of-Engagement Ambiguity", "one_liner": "Diagnose frontline breakdown under time pressure as a grain mismatch — decision rules written coarser than the environment generates choice points — paid out of a finite discretion budget, relocating the fix from the operator's judgment to the rule, escalation path, and pre-positioned authority.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:rules_of_engagement_ambiguity", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "rules_of_engagement_ambiguity"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "rules_of_engagement_ambiguity", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P038-C04-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every complete instance contains an operative communication intended to direct frontline behavior whose grain is too coarse to decide the encountered action. That necessarily supplies the communication-and-bluntness branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_GUARDED_EQUIVALENT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Holding the complete cheap_talk exact record and qualifier 'Sender-receiver incentive bias is large enough to force a coarse message partition.' fixed, I varied optional manifestations and found no complete instance that falsifies the selected DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Cheap Talk", "one_liner": "Costless, non-binding communication whose credibility rests entirely on incentive alignment: as the gap between sender and receiver interests widens, the information a costless message can carry shrinks through ever-coarser partitions down to meaningless babble.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:cheap_talk", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O6"], "guard_type": "THRESHOLD_CROSSING", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "bias_forces_coarse_message_partition", "predicate": "Sender-receiver incentive bias is large enough to force a coarse message partition.", "rationale": "The candidate supplies the structural spine; the emitted qualifier is one anchored, atomic, non-restating fact sufficient for a complete DNF branch."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "cheap_talk"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "bias_forces_coarse_message_partition"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "cheap_talk", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P038-C04-U1", "why_it_fits": "Cheap talk directly supplies a communication that can influence receiver action, but aligned interests permit full precision. One threshold binding on the existing bias parameter selects the coarse-partition regime and makes the communication blunt."}], "publication_role": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT_ONLY", "source_residual_occurrence_id": "r:elasticity_based_leverage:b024_a10_c6", "unit": {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P038-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"], ["O1", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O3", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an existing lever intended to influence behavior, not a merely proposed future mechanism.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An existing behavior-change lever is in use or available.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "These branches must preserve an incentive as the defect-bearing behavior-change lever.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The focal lever is an incentive.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "These branches must preserve a communication as the defect-bearing behavior-change lever.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The focal lever is a communication.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "These branches must preserve excessive breadth relative to the behavior or audience that should be targeted.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The focal lever is too broad in scope.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "These branches must preserve material cost of the existing incentive or communication.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The focal lever is costly.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "These branches must preserve insufficient targeting precision or responsiveness discrimination in the lever.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The focal lever is blunt rather than behaviorally precise.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "An existing incentive or communication is too broad, costly, or blunt.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An existing incentive or communication has one listed defect.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P038-C04-U1"}}]}
{"archetype": {"name": "Emergency Authority Activation and Constraint", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:emergency_authority_activation_and_constraint", "slug": "emergency_authority_activation_and_constraint"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Systems governed by ordinary authority channels may respond too slowly during crisis, but ad hoc emergency power can become unchecked, vague, sticky, or abusive. Without predefined triggers, scope limits, oversight, and reversion rules, exceptional authority either fails to activate when needed or remains active after its justification has expired.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Systems governed by ordinary authority channels may respond too slowly during crisis, but ad hoc emergency power can become unchecked, vague, sticky, or abusive. Without predefined triggers, scope limits, oversight, and reversion rules, exceptional authority either fails to activate when needed or remains active after its justification has expired."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires an acute time-critical disruption and a temporary compressed command structure optimized for rapid stabilization.", "role_mapping": "Acute threat -> trigger event; faster authority -> compressed command.", "slug": "incident_response", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b024_a11_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A time-sensitive threat requires faster decisions or broader powers than ordinary procedures allow. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A time-sensitive threat requires faster decisions or broader powers than ordinary procedures allow."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Incident Response", "one_liner": "A system facing acute, time-critical disruption engages a temporary command regime that prioritises stabilisation over diagnosis, accepts reversible degradation, defers root-cause analysis, and compresses decision authority for the duration of the acute phase only.", "page_ref": "prime:incident_response", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Acute threat -> trigger event; faster authority -> compressed command.", "slug": "incident_response", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires an acute time-critical disruption and a temporary compressed command structure optimized for rapid stabilization."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "An acute time-sensitive threat requires faster decisions or broader powers than ordinary procedure supplies.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P038-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve necessity of the response, not merely a preferred or optional action.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A focal response is necessary in the situation at issue.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve counterfactual prevention by the normal constraint, including the would-block modality and direction.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Under ordinary governance, the selected constraint would block that response.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve an ordinary approval path as what would prevent the necessary response.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The blocking constraint is a normal approval chain.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve an ordinary staffing rule as what would prevent the necessary response.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The blocking constraint is a normal staffing rule.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve an ordinary access restriction as what would prevent the necessary response.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The blocking constraint is a normal access control.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve an ordinary jurisdictional boundary as what would prevent the necessary response.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The blocking constraint is a normal jurisdiction boundary.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "One listed ordinary authority constraint would block a necessary response.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An ordinary institutional constraint would block a necessary response.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P038-C05-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Incident response can be invoked by a standing commander even when normal approval chains would not block action.", "slug": "incident_response"}], "residual_id": "r:emergency_authority_activation_and_constraint:b024_a11_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b024_a11_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Normal approval chains, staffing rules, access controls, or jurisdiction boundaries would block necessary response. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Normal approval chains, staffing rules, access controls, or jurisdiction boundaries would block necessary response."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_GUARDED_EQUIVALENT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Holding the complete customs_clearance_delay exact record and qualifier 'Moving the physically ready shipment is a necessary response in the focal situation.' fixed, I varied optional manifestations and found no complete instance that falsifies the selected DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Customs-Clearance Delay", "one_liner": "The cross-border failure mode in which a physically ready shipment is held immobile because a sovereign clearance authority has not yet issued the release token — a permission-gate bottleneck immune to transport remedies, with queueing dynamics and a linear-then-catastrophic cost.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:customs_clearance_delay", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "shipment_movement_is_necessary_response", "predicate": "Moving the physically ready shipment is a necessary response in the focal situation.", "rationale": "The candidate supplies the structural spine; the emitted qualifier is one anchored, atomic, non-restating fact sufficient for a complete DNF branch."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "customs_clearance_delay"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "shipment_movement_is_necessary_response"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "customs_clearance_delay", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P038-C05-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires a physically ready movement to be blocked by the ordinary sovereign release gate. A routine shipment need not be a necessary response, so one necessity-status qualifier closes the sole live gap."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Normal approvals, staffing, access controls, or jurisdiction boundaries block necessary response.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "Exceptional authority lacks or requires explicit scope, expiry, oversight, audit, and forced reversion safeguards.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Exceptional authority lacks or requires explicit scope, expiry, oversight, audit, and forced reversion safeguards.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The system can define observable crisis conditions that justify exceptional authority.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Systems governed by ordinary authority channels may respond too slowly during crisis, but ad hoc emergency power can become unchecked, vague, sticky, or abusive. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: The system can define observable crisis conditions that justify exceptional authority. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The system can define observable crisis conditions that justify exceptional authority.", "Systems governed by ordinary authority channels may respond too slowly during crisis, but ad hoc emergency power can become unchecked, vague, sticky, or abusive."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "The system can define observable crisis conditions that justify exceptional authority."}, {"display_text": "Emergency powers carry meaningful abuse, legitimacy, safety, or lock-in risk if unconstrained.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Systems governed by ordinary authority channels may respond too slowly during crisis, but ad hoc emergency power can become unchecked, vague, sticky, or abusive. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Emergency powers carry meaningful abuse, legitimacy, safety, or lock-in risk if unconstrained. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Emergency powers carry meaningful abuse, legitimacy, safety, or lock-in risk if unconstrained.", "Systems governed by ordinary authority channels may respond too slowly during crisis, but ad hoc emergency power can become unchecked, vague, sticky, or abusive."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Emergency powers carry meaningful abuse, legitimacy, safety, or lock-in risk if unconstrained."}, {"display_text": "The response must coordinate actors who normally operate under separate authorities.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The response must coordinate actors who normally operate under separate authorities. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The response must coordinate actors who normally operate under separate authorities."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The response must coordinate actors who normally operate under separate authorities."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 24, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-024", "ledger_sha256": "0fec5317f30d34d75f29843acd71bce6a96b4eb45a29cdd4824323f3fc44300c"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": [{"groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_GUARDED_EQUIVALENT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Holding the complete common_operating_picture_breakdown exact record and qualifier 'The response participants normally operate under separate administrative authorities.' fixed, I varied optional manifestations and found no complete instance that falsifies the selected DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Common-Operating-Picture Breakdown", "one_liner": "The failure mode where a multi-party response acts incoherently because its engineered shared picture fails to synthesise participants' partial views — relocating the fault from the responders to the artefact, whose currency, completeness, and consistency become the lever.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:common_operating_picture_breakdown", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "response_participants_have_separate_authorities", "predicate": "The response participants normally operate under separate administrative authorities.", "rationale": "The candidate supplies the structural spine; the emitted qualifier is one anchored, atomic, non-restating fact sufficient for a complete DNF branch."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "common_operating_picture_breakdown"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "response_participants_have_separate_authorities"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "common_operating_picture_breakdown", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P038-C06-U1", "why_it_fits": "The candidate directly requires a multi-party response and response-critical synthesis, but participants can belong to one authority. One governance-domain restriction supplies normal separation without adding an actor or relation."}], "publication_role": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT_ONLY", "source_residual_occurrence_id": "r:emergency_authority_activation_and_constraint:b024_a11_c5", "unit": {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P038-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve multiple response actors rather than coordination internal to one undifferentiated actor.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "At least two actors participate in the focal response.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve ordinary separation of the actors' authority domains, not merely different job functions under one authority.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Those actors normally operate under separate authorities.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve mandatory cross-authority coordination for the response, not optional communication or coexistence.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The focal response requires coordination among those actors.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "The response must coordinate actors who normally operate under separate authorities.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A response requires coordination across normally separate authorities.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P038-C06-U1"}}]}
{"archetype": {"name": "Emergent Formalization", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:emergent_formalization", "slug": "emergent_formalization"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 2, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 2 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 2}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a gap between **actual practice** and **explicit structure**. People have learned something through repeated local action, but the learning remains hidden in habits, memory, informal conversations, insider knowledge, or unspoken expectations.\n\nThat gap creates several costs. Newcomers cannot reproduce the practice. Adjacent teams reinterpret it inconsistently. Quality depends on who happens to remember the tacit rule. Useful local learning fails to spread. In high-stakes settings, undocumented practice may be impossible to audit or improve. In communities, unwritten norms may be enforced unevenly.\n\nAt the same time, the informal character of the practice may be part of why it works. It may contain judgment, improvisation, local adaptation, and tacit cues. The formalization problem is therefore not simply “write it down.” It is to translate the practice into explicit form while preserving enough context, exceptions, and revision capacity for it to remain alive.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "People or components repeatedly solve a problem informally, but the pattern remains tacit, fragile, inconsistent, or dependent on local memory."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P038-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a locally sustained practice not yet dependent on formal codification or centralized role definition.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A focal problem-solving practice is local and informal.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve recurrence of the focal problem, not a one-off situation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The same type of problem recurs over time.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve repeated application of the practice, not a single improvised use.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The practice is used repeatedly on that recurring problem.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the practice's problem-solving function rather than mere repetition without useful effect.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Use of the practice solves the recurring problem.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "A local informal practice is repeatedly used to solve a recurring problem.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A local informal practice repeatedly solves a recurring problem.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P038-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Formalization can codify a one-off intuitive argument and does not require repeated use on a recurring problem.", "slug": "formalization"}], "residual_id": "r:emergent_formalization:b024_a12_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b024_a12_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A local workaround, practice, convention, norm, role, or decision routine is repeatedly used to solve a recurring problem. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A local workaround, practice, convention, norm, role, or decision routine is repeatedly used to solve a recurring problem."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "I varied optional manifestations within the complete greenspuns_tenth_rule exact record and found no instance that falsifies the selected DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Greenspun's Tenth Rule", "one_liner": "The aphorism that any sufficiently complicated C or Fortran program contains an ad hoc, bug-ridden implementation of half of Common Lisp — because features a language withholds do not vanish but migrate inside the program as defective re-implementations.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:greenspuns_tenth_rule", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "greenspuns_tenth_rule"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "greenspuns_tenth_rule", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P038-C07-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every complete instance above the candidate's threshold contains a series of ad hoc local workarounds repeatedly supplying capabilities withheld by the base language. The recurring practice-problem-solution relation is therefore direct."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Holding the complete repair_sequence exact record and qualifier 'The same repair routine is repeatedly used for a recurring type of conversational trouble.' fixed, I varied optional manifestations and found no complete instance that falsifies the selected DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Repair Sequence", "one_liner": "Resolve any conversational trouble by locating it in a small grid — trouble source, initiation, completion, crossed by who repairs (self or other) and where in the turn-sequence — and read the likely path to resolution off the preference for self-repair.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:repair_sequence", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2", "O3"], "guard_type": "QUANTIFIER_BINDING", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "repair_routine_repeats_for_recurring_trouble", "predicate": "The same repair routine is repeatedly used for a recurring type of conversational trouble.", "rationale": "The candidate supplies the structural spine; the emitted qualifier is one anchored, atomic, non-restating fact sufficient for a complete DNF branch."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "repair_sequence"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "repair_routine_repeats_for_recurring_trouble"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "repair_sequence", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P038-C07-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record supplies an informal local routine that resolves trouble, but a complete instance can be one isolated sequence. One frequency binding over the existing practice-problem relation supplies both recurrence and repeated use."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A local informal practice repeatedly solves a recurring problem.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P038-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the source's apparent-usefulness threshold rather than requiring independently proven objective utility.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The focal practice appears sufficiently useful for its treatment to matter.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve continued tacitness of the focal practice, not a defect after it has been fully made explicit.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The practice remains tacit rather than explicitly formalized.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve tacitness as producing the selected consequence, not merely co-occurring with it.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Leaving the practice tacit causes the selected defect.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve inconsistent execution or application caused by the practice remaining tacit.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The resulting defect is inconsistency.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve fragility of the practice or its outcomes caused by continued tacitness.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The resulting defect is fragility.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve unequal access, treatment, or benefit caused by the practice remaining tacit.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The resulting defect is inequity.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve duplicated effort or practice caused by lack of explicit shared form.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The resulting defect is duplication.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve reliance on locally held memory caused by the practice remaining tacit.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The resulting defect is dependence on local memory.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Leaving an apparently useful practice tacit creates at least one listed operational defect.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Keeping a sufficiently useful practice tacit causes one listed defect.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P038-C08-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A practice can be formalized for convenience even when its tacit form remains robust and equitable.", "slug": "formalization"}], "residual_id": "r:emergent_formalization:b024_a12_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b024_a12_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The practice appears useful enough that leaving it tacit creates inconsistency, fragility, inequity, duplication, or dependence on local memory. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The practice appears useful enough that leaving it tacit creates inconsistency, fragility, inequity, duplication, or dependence on local memory."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "I varied optional manifestations within the complete greenspuns_tenth_rule exact record and found no instance that falsifies the selected DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Greenspun's Tenth Rule", "one_liner": "The aphorism that any sufficiently complicated C or Fortran program contains an ad hoc, bug-ridden implementation of half of Common Lisp — because features a language withholds do not vanish but migrate inside the program as defective re-implementations.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:greenspuns_tenth_rule", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "greenspuns_tenth_rule"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "greenspuns_tenth_rule", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P038-C08-U1", "why_it_fits": "The candidate requires needed capabilities to be supplied by informally specified, undocumented workarounds whose accidental accretion produces defective quality and non-reuse. It directly satisfies the fragility and duplication branches."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Holding the complete annotation_drift exact record and qualifier 'The focal annotation practice is treated as sufficiently useful to retain.' fixed, I varied optional manifestations and found no complete instance that falsifies the selected DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Annotation Drift", "one_liner": "The gradual, undocumented shift over time in how annotators apply an unchanged rubric, so identical instances get different labels — a silent recalibration of a measurement instrument, invisible to within-slice agreement and detectable only by re-annotating frozen gold.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:annotation_drift", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "THRESHOLD_CROSSING", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "annotation_practice_treated_as_sufficiently_useful", "predicate": "The focal annotation practice is treated as sufficiently useful to retain.", "rationale": "The candidate supplies the structural spine; the emitted qualifier is one anchored, atomic, non-restating fact sufficient for a complete DNF branch."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "annotation_drift"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "annotation_practice_treated_as_sufficiently_useful"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "annotation_drift", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P038-C08-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record directly supplies tacitness, causal direction, and inconsistency, but it does not require that the drifting practice be sufficiently useful to retain. One threshold judgment on that existing practice completes the inconsistency branch."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Leaving a useful practice tacit creates inconsistency, fragility, inequity, duplication, or memory dependence.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The pattern has stabilized sufficiently to be described without erasing important variation.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: The pattern has stabilized sufficiently to be described without erasing important variation. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The pattern has stabilized sufficiently to be described without erasing important variation."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "The pattern has stabilized sufficiently to be described without erasing important variation."}, {"display_text": "Other actors, teams, sites, systems, or future participants would benefit from being able to understand, reuse, audit, or adapt the practice.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The archetype is especially useful when the informal practice has become important enough that newcomers, adjacent teams, partners, or future maintainers need a stable representation of it. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: Other actors, teams, sites, systems, or future participants would benefit from being able to understand, reuse, audit, or adapt the practice. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Other actors, teams, sites, systems, or future participants would benefit from being able to understand, reuse, audit, or adapt the practice.", "The archetype is especially useful when the informal practice has become important enough that newcomers, adjacent teams, partners, or future maintainers need a stable representation of it."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Other actors, teams, sites, systems, or future participants would benefit from being able to understand, reuse, audit, or adapt the practice."}, {"display_text": "Stakeholders need a clearer standard, role, protocol, rule, template, or institutional form, but top-down design alone would miss the knowledge embedded in actual practice.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Do not use it when the practice is still exploratory, when top-down design is creating a new rule from scratch, when the central issue is compatibility across systems, or when codification would legitimize a harmful informal pattern. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: Stakeholders need a clearer standard, role, protocol, rule, template, or institutional form, but top-down design alone would miss the knowledge embedded in actual practice. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders need a clearer standard, role, protocol, rule, template, or institutional form, but top-down design alone would miss the knowledge embedded in actual practice.", "Do not use it when the practice is still exploratory, when top-down design is creating a new rule from scratch, when the central issue is compatibility across systems, or when codification would legitimize a harmful informal pattern."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Stakeholders need a clearer standard, role, protocol, rule, template, or institutional form, but top-down design alone would miss the knowledge embedded in actual practice."}, {"display_text": "There is enough authority, legitimacy, and stewardship capacity to maintain the formalized structure after codification.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The formalization problem is therefore not simply “write it down.” It is to translate the practice into explicit form while preserving enough context, exceptions, and revision capacity for it to remain alive. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: There is enough authority, legitimacy, and stewardship capacity to maintain the formalized structure after codification. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["There is enough authority, legitimacy, and stewardship capacity to maintain the formalized structure after codification.", "The formalization problem is therefore not simply “write it down.” It is to translate the practice into explicit form while preserving enough context, exceptions, and revision capacity for it to remain alive."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "There is enough authority, legitimacy, and stewardship capacity to maintain the formalized structure after codification."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 24, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-024", "ledger_sha256": "0fec5317f30d34d75f29843acd71bce6a96b4eb45a29cdd4824323f3fc44300c"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Emergent Pattern Detection", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:emergent_pattern_detection", "slug": "emergent_pattern_detection"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is pattern blindness under decentralization. Each local actor, site, team, or component sees only a fragment. Central observers may see high-level metrics but not the interaction pattern that links the fragments. As a result, the system can miss both danger and value: many small incidents may combine into harm, and many small adaptations may reveal an opportunity or practice worth supporting.\n\nThe core tension is that early emergence is ambiguous. If the system waits for certainty, it may respond too late. If it treats every variation as emergence, it creates noise, false alarms, and intrusive monitoring. The archetype must therefore preserve uncertainty while still creating enough visibility for timely action.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system-level pattern is forming from many local interactions, but no single actor directly designs it or sees enough of the whole to recognize it. Existing monitoring may capture events, metrics, or incidents, yet miss the emergent relationship among them."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires lower-level constituents and local interaction rules that causally generate a qualitatively novel higher-level phenomenon.", "role_mapping": "Local actors -> constituents; combined behavior -> higher-level phenomenon.", "slug": "emergence", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b024_a13_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Many actors, components, teams, users, organisms, or agents interact locally and their combined behavior matters at system level. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Many actors, components, teams, users, organisms, or agents interact locally and their combined behavior matters at system level."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Emergence", "one_liner": "Complex patterns from simple rules.", "page_ref": "prime:emergence", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Local actors -> constituents; combined behavior -> higher-level phenomenon.", "slug": "emergence", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires lower-level constituents and local interaction rules that causally generate a qualitatively novel higher-level phenomenon."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Many local actors or components interact and jointly generate a system-level phenomenon.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The higher-level property must be generated by lower-level interactions without external insertion or explicit central specification.", "role_mapping": "Distributed generation -> local causal interactions; no central command -> without external insertion.", "slug": "emergence", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b024_a13_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The macro-pattern is not directly commanded or centrally specified; it arises from distributed behavior, feedback, incentives, constraints, imitation, or adaptation. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The macro-pattern is not directly commanded or centrally specified; it arises from distributed behavior, feedback, incentives, constraints, imitation, or adaptation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Emergence", "one_liner": "Complex patterns from simple rules.", "page_ref": "prime:emergence", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Distributed generation -> local causal interactions; no central command -> without external insertion.", "slug": "emergence", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The higher-level property must be generated by lower-level interactions without external insertion or explicit central specification."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The macro-pattern arises from distributed behavior rather than central specification.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P038-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve actual visibility of local activity through an existing monitoring surface.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An existing monitoring apparatus exposes local activities.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the local activities as the material whose aggregate relation is at issue.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A possible emerging macro-pattern would be composed from those activities.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve omission of an aggregate-emergence test, not monitoring that already performs that test.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The monitoring apparatus does not test whether that macro-pattern is emerging.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Existing local-activity monitoring omits a test for whether those activities form an emerging macro-pattern.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Monitoring exposes local activity but does not test for emergent aggregate structure.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P038-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Monitoring can explicitly detect system-level deviations and trigger response; it does not entail this blind spot.", "slug": "monitoring"}], "residual_id": "r:emergent_pattern_detection:b024_a13_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b024_a13_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Existing dashboards, audits, or reports show local activity but do not ask whether a new macro-pattern is emerging from those activities. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Existing dashboards, audits, or reports show local activity but do not ask whether a new macro-pattern is emerging from those activities."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Monitoring can explicitly detect system-level deviations and trigger response; it does not entail this blind spot.", "slug": "monitoring"}], "normalized_requirement": "Existing monitoring exposes local activity but does not test for an emergent macro-pattern.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Existing monitoring exposes local activity but does not test for an emergent macro-pattern.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Local signals are noisy, partial, or ambiguous, but their aggregate pattern may indicate a meaningful shift.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The pattern may be beneficial, harmful, or ambiguous. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Local signals are noisy, partial, or ambiguous, but their aggregate pattern may indicate a meaningful shift. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Local signals are noisy, partial, or ambiguous, but their aggregate pattern may indicate a meaningful shift.", "The pattern may be beneficial, harmful, or ambiguous."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Local signals are noisy, partial, or ambiguous, but their aggregate pattern may indicate a meaningful shift."}, {"display_text": "Early response would be valuable because the pattern could be amplified, formalized, contained, redirected, or investigated before it becomes entrenched.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It should be used only when there is a plausible response path after detection; otherwise it becomes passive dashboarding or surveillance. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Early response would be valuable because the pattern could be amplified, formalized, contained, redirected, or investigated before it becomes entrenched. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Early response would be valuable because the pattern could be amplified, formalized, contained, redirected, or investigated before it becomes entrenched.", "It should be used only when there is a plausible response path after detection; otherwise it becomes passive dashboarding or surveillance."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Early response would be valuable because the pattern could be amplified, formalized, contained, redirected, or investigated before it becomes entrenched."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 24, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-024", "ledger_sha256": "0fec5317f30d34d75f29843acd71bce6a96b4eb45a29cdd4824323f3fc44300c"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": [{"groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "I varied optional manifestations within the complete covariate_shift_blind_spot exact record and found no instance that falsifies the selected DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Covariate-Shift Blind Spot", "one_liner": "The deployment failure in which a model's input distribution P(X) drifts outside its training support while P(Y|X) holds — and goes undetected because monitoring watches lagging outcome metrics instead of the immediately-available input signal.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:covariate_shift_blind_spot", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "covariate_shift_blind_spot"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "covariate_shift_blind_spot", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P038-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every complete instance contains multiple individually partial live inputs whose aggregate P(X) carries a meaningful shift. The candidate therefore directly satisfies the partial-signal branch."}], "publication_role": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT_ONLY", "source_residual_occurrence_id": "r:emergent_pattern_detection:b024_a13_c3", "unit": {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P038-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve plural local signals capable of being considered jointly, not a single isolated indicator.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Multiple focal signals arise locally.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve aggregation of the focal local signals rather than introduce an unrelated system-level measure.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The aggregate pattern is composed from those same local signals.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve possible aggregate indication of a meaningful shift without strengthening it to certain detection.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The aggregate may indicate a meaningful shift.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve noise as the limitation affecting the local signals.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The local signals are noisy.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve incompleteness or partial coverage as the limitation affecting the local signals.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The local signals are partial.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve ambiguity of interpretation as the limitation affecting the local signals.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The local signals are ambiguous.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Local signals with one listed limitation may collectively indicate a meaningful shift.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Limited local signals may carry a meaningful shift in aggregate.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P038-C09-U1"}}]}
{"archetype": {"name": "Emergent Role Formation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:emergent_role_formation", "slug": "emergent_role_formation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 2, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 2, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 2 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a mismatch between real contribution patterns and formal role structure. Work is being differentiated by use, need, and adaptation, but the formal system has not caught up. This can leave important labor invisible, create dependency on unsupported people, allow informal power to grow without accountability, or force evolving work into roles that no longer fit.\n\nThe core tension is that roles help coordination, legitimacy, and accountability, yet premature role design can misread the work. Emergent Role Formation resolves this by using observed contribution patterns as evidence before formalizing or supporting a role.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A group, community, organization, or multi-actor system needs role differentiation, but centrally designed roles either lag behind changing work, fail to match actual contributions, ignore invisible labor, or impose categories before stable responsibilities have emerged."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P038-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve clustered contributions performed by people, not isolated unrelated acts or a predeclared formal job alone.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "People perform a coherent cluster of contributions.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve recurring performance of the cluster rather than a single contribution episode.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The contribution cluster is performed repeatedly.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve useful contribution by the cluster rather than mere repeated activity with no useful function.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The contribution cluster is useful.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve absence of an established name for the recurring contribution cluster.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The contribution cluster has not yet been named.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve absence of institutional or operational support for the recurring contribution cluster.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The contribution cluster has not yet been supported.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve absence of explicit scope or responsibility boundaries for the recurring contribution cluster.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The contribution cluster has not yet been bounded.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "People repeatedly perform useful contribution clusters that remain unnamed, unsupported, and unbounded.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A repeatedly performed useful contribution cluster lacks naming, support, and boundaries.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P038-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A role is already a named bundle of expected behavior and need not emerge from an unsupported contribution cluster.", "slug": "role"}], "residual_id": "r:emergent_role_formation:b024_a14_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b024_a14_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: People repeatedly perform contribution clusters that are useful but not yet named, supported, or bounded. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["People repeatedly perform contribution clusters that are useful but not yet named, supported, or bounded."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A role is already a named bundle of expected behavior and need not emerge from an unsupported contribution cluster.", "slug": "role"}], "normalized_requirement": "People repeatedly perform useful contribution clusters that are not yet named, supported, or bounded.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "People repeatedly perform useful contribution clusters that are not yet named, supported, or bounded.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P038-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a formal role-related structure, not an informal convention alone.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An existing formal arrangement allocates work, authority, or permission.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve actual work practice as the comparison object rather than another formal specification.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A focal pattern describes how the relevant work is actually performed.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an actual mismatch between formal role structure and work practice, including the negative polarity.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The formal arrangement does not match the actual work pattern.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "An existing formal role arrangement does not match how work is actually done.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Formal role structure mismatches actual work practice.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P038-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Role fluidity can be intentionally authorized and aligned with work rather than evidence of a formal-role mismatch.", "slug": "role_fluidity"}], "residual_id": "r:emergent_role_formation:b024_a14_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b024_a14_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Existing job descriptions, offices, permissions, or team roles do not match how work is actually getting done. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Existing job descriptions, offices, permissions, or team roles do not match how work is actually getting done."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "I varied optional manifestations within the complete unity_of_command_breakdown exact record and found no instance that falsifies the selected DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Unity-of-Command Breakdown", "one_liner": "The command-and-control failure in which one subordinate node in the authority graph carries two or more binding in-edges for the same task at the same time, so that when the supervisors' orders diverge the actor cannot comply with both.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:unity_of_command_breakdown", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "unity_of_command_breakdown"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "unity_of_command_breakdown", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P038-C12-U1", "why_it_fits": "A realized unity-of-command breakdown universally requires a formal authority topology whose conflicting simultaneous directives cannot be enacted in actual work. This is the required mismatch, not merely generic coordination difficulty."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "I varied optional manifestations within the complete plan_execute_gap exact record and found no instance that falsifies the selected DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Plan-Execute Gap", "one_liner": "The pathology in which a coarse-grained planning artefact cannot be enacted because the execution layer faces binding fine-grained constraints the planning model never represented — so the fix is constraint propagation and feedback, never a better forecast.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:plan_execute_gap", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "plan_execute_gap"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "plan_execute_gap", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P038-C12-U1", "why_it_fits": "The unit permits a formal arrangement that allocates work, not only a job or authority chart. Every plan-execute-gap instance contains such a prescriptive allocation and an actual execution pattern that cannot match it."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Formal job descriptions, offices, permissions, or team roles mismatch how work is actually done.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P038-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve clustered contributions performed by people, not isolated unrelated acts or a predeclared formal job alone.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "People perform a coherent cluster of contributions.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve recurring performance of the cluster rather than a single contribution episode.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The contribution cluster is performed repeatedly.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve useful contribution by the cluster rather than mere repeated activity with no useful function.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The contribution cluster is useful.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve absence of an established name for the recurring contribution cluster.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The contribution cluster has not yet been named.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve absence of institutional or operational support for the recurring contribution cluster.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The contribution cluster has not yet been supported.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve absence of explicit scope or responsibility boundaries for the recurring contribution cluster.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The contribution cluster has not yet been bounded.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "People repeatedly perform useful contribution clusters that remain unnamed, unsupported, and unbounded.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A repeatedly performed useful contribution cluster lacks naming, support, and boundaries.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P038-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A role is already a named bundle of expected behavior and need not emerge from an unsupported contribution cluster.", "slug": "role"}], "residual_id": "r:emergent_role_formation:b024_a14_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b024_a14_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: People repeatedly perform contribution clusters that are useful but not yet named, supported, or bounded. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["People repeatedly perform contribution clusters that are useful but not yet named, supported, or bounded."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A role is already a named bundle of expected behavior and need not emerge from an unsupported contribution cluster.", "slug": "role"}], "normalized_requirement": "People repeatedly perform useful contribution clusters that are not yet named, supported, or bounded.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "People repeatedly perform useful contribution clusters that are not yet named, supported, or bounded.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P038-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an actually occupied informal role, not a formally assigned position alone.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A person occupies an informal contribution or coordination role.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve current or prior-existing influence rather than only a plan for future influence.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The role occupant's influence is already present.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve actual influence on outcomes by the same informal role occupant.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The informal role occupant shapes outcomes.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "People in informal contribution or coordination roles already shape outcomes.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An informal role occupant already influences outcomes.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P038-C13-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A formal role can shape outcomes while its occupant and expectations are fully explicit.", "slug": "role"}], "residual_id": "r:emergent_role_formation:b024_a14_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b024_a14_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Informal leaders, maintainers, moderators, mentors, connectors, triagers, or stewards are already shaping outcomes. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Informal leaders, maintainers, moderators, mentors, connectors, triagers, or stewards are already shaping outcomes."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_SYNTHESIS", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Holding the complete founder_blind_spot exact record and qualifier 'The originator's focal coordination role is informal rather than formally assigned.' fixed, I varied optional manifestations and found no complete instance that falsifies the selected DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Founder Blind Spot", "one_liner": "The venture pattern where a thesis's originator, holding the authority to reroute disconfirming signals, systematically preserves their prior instead of revising it — because revision is uniquely expensive at the authoring seat.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:founder_blind_spot", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "originator_coordination_role_is_informal", "predicate": "The originator's focal coordination role is informal rather than formally assigned.", "rationale": "The candidate supplies the structural spine; the emitted qualifier is one anchored, atomic, non-restating fact sufficient for a complete DNF branch."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "founder_blind_spot"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "originator_coordination_role_is_informal"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "founder_blind_spot", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P038-C13-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires an originator already exercising outcome-shaping filtering authority. One formal-status restriction on that same occupied role completes the head without adding another actor or causal relation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Informal leaders, maintainers, mentors, connectors, or stewards already shape outcomes.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The system needs more coordination, accountability, or continuity, but assigning roles too early would misclassify evolving work.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The core tension is that roles help coordination, legitimacy, and accountability, yet premature role design can misread the work. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: The system needs more coordination, accountability, or continuity, but assigning roles too early would misclassify evolving work. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The system needs more coordination, accountability, or continuity, but assigning roles too early would misclassify evolving work.", "The core tension is that roles help coordination, legitimacy, and accountability, yet premature role design can misread the work."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The system needs more coordination, accountability, or continuity, but assigning roles too early would misclassify evolving work."}, {"display_text": "A role seems to have emerged from self-organization and now needs legitimacy, resourcing, scope, and adaptation review.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The core tension is that roles help coordination, legitimacy, and accountability, yet premature role design can misread the work. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: A role seems to have emerged from self-organization and now needs legitimacy, resourcing, scope, and adaptation review. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A role seems to have emerged from self-organization and now needs legitimacy, resourcing, scope, and adaptation review.", "The core tension is that roles help coordination, legitimacy, and accountability, yet premature role design can misread the work."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "A role seems to have emerged from self-organization and now needs legitimacy, resourcing, scope, and adaptation review."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 24, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-024", "ledger_sha256": "0fec5317f30d34d75f29843acd71bce6a96b4eb45a29cdd4824323f3fc44300c"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Emergent Similarity Partitioning", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:emergent_similarity_partitioning", "slug": "emergent_similarity_partitioning"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 1 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 1}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A population of cases, users, events, texts, organisms, regions, assets, or observations may contain meaningful substructure, but no reliable labels exist. If actors impose categories too early, they may erase discovery; if they merely look for patterns informally, they may overread noise. The system needs a disciplined way to let candidate groups emerge from similarity while preserving uncertainty about what the groups mean.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A population of cases, users, events, texts, organisms, regions, assets, or observations may contain meaningful substructure, but no reliable labels exist. If actors impose categories too early, they may erase discovery; if they merely look for patterns informally, they may overread noise. The system needs a disciplined way to let candidate groups emerge from similarity while preserving uncertainty about what the groups mean."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires an unlabelled population whose group labels do not exist before the procedure.", "role_mapping": "Unlabelled population -> absent reliable labels; labels as output -> no predefined taxonomy.", "slug": "clustering", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b024_a15_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The population is unlabeled, weakly labeled, or labeled by a taxonomy suspected of being stale or imposed. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The population is unlabeled, weakly labeled, or labeled by a taxonomy suspected of being stale or imposed."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Clustering", "one_liner": "Partitioning a population into groups by within-group similarity in a chosen feature space without predefined labels, so the labels are an output rather than an input.", "page_ref": "prime:clustering", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Unlabelled population -> absent reliable labels; labels as output -> no predefined taxonomy.", "slug": "clustering", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires an unlabelled population whose group labels do not exist before the procedure."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The population lacks reliable predefined labels or carries a stale imposed taxonomy.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Cases can be represented by features, relations, behaviors, trajectories, attributes, or embeddings that support comparison.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: Cases can be represented by features, relations, behaviors, trajectories, attributes, or embeddings that support comparison. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Cases can be represented by features, relations, behaviors, trajectories, attributes, or embeddings that support comparison."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "Cases can be represented by features, relations, behaviors, trajectories, attributes, or embeddings that support comparison."}, {"display_text": "The practical question concerns group structure, not one-by-one prediction or assignment to already-known classes.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: The practical question concerns group structure, not one-by-one prediction or assignment to already-known classes. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The practical question concerns group structure, not one-by-one prediction or assignment to already-known classes."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "The practical question concerns group structure, not one-by-one prediction or assignment to already-known classes."}, {"display_text": "Different choices of scale, metric, feature weighting, or algorithm could plausibly change the resulting groups.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Letting labels emerge protects against premature taxonomy, but every emergent partition is still shaped by representation and metric choices. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Different choices of scale, metric, feature weighting, or algorithm could plausibly change the resulting groups. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Different choices of scale, metric, feature weighting, or algorithm could plausibly change the resulting groups.", "Letting labels emerge protects against premature taxonomy, but every emergent partition is still shaped by representation and metric choices."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Different choices of scale, metric, feature weighting, or algorithm could plausibly change the resulting groups."}, {"display_text": "Downstream actions such as routing, sampling, diagnosis, personalization, intervention, or explanation depend on whether the groups are stable and interpretable.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: Downstream actions such as routing, sampling, diagnosis, personalization, intervention, or explanation depend on whether the groups are stable and interpretable. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Downstream actions such as routing, sampling, diagnosis, personalization, intervention, or explanation depend on whether the groups are stable and interpretable."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Downstream actions such as routing, sampling, diagnosis, personalization, intervention, or explanation depend on whether the groups are stable and interpretable."}, {"display_text": "Outliers, mixed cases, or boundary cases are expected and should not be forced into overconfident labels.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A population of cases, users, events, texts, organisms, regions, assets, or observations may contain meaningful substructure, but no reliable labels exist. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Outliers, mixed cases, or boundary cases are expected and should not be forced into overconfident labels. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Outliers, mixed cases, or boundary cases are expected and should not be forced into overconfident labels.", "A population of cases, users, events, texts, organisms, regions, assets, or observations may contain meaningful substructure, but no reliable labels exist."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Outliers, mixed cases, or boundary cases are expected and should not be forced into overconfident labels."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 24, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-024", "ledger_sha256": "0fec5317f30d34d75f29843acd71bce6a96b4eb45a29cdd4824323f3fc44300c"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": [{"groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "I varied optional manifestations within the complete label_ambiguity exact record and found no instance that falsifies the selected DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Label Ambiguity", "one_liner": "Diagnose a headline accuracy figure as a blend of two measurements — model capability in the class interior where annotators agree, and mere adjudication agreement in the boundary zone where reasonable experts split — by stratifying metrics on the inter-annotator agreement rate.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:label_ambiguity", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "label_ambiguity"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "label_ambiguity", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P038-C14-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every complete instance requires boundary-zone cases on which reasonable experts split and treats hard labeling of those cases as the failure. The boundary-case branch is directly entailed."}], "publication_role": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT_ONLY", "source_residual_occurrence_id": "r:emergent_similarity_partitioning:b024_a15_c6", "unit": {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P038-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a classification setting containing cases to which labels could be assigned.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A focal population or case set is being classified.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve expectation of the selected case type rather than only an unforeseen exceptional case.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "At least one selected difficult case type is expected in that setting.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the normative prohibition on forced overconfidence, not merely describe uncertainty.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Such a case should not be forced into a label more confident than its status supports.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve an outlier as the expected case subject to the labeling constraint.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The selected expected case is an outlier.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve a mixed-membership or mixed-character case subject to the labeling constraint.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The selected expected case is a mixed case.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve a boundary case as the expected case subject to the labeling constraint.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The selected expected case is a boundary case.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "An expected outlier, mixed case, or boundary case should not be forced into an overconfident label.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An expected ambiguous or atypical case should not receive a forced overconfident label.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P038-C14-U1"}}]}
{"archetype": {"name": "Emic-Etic Dual-Account Interpretation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:emic_etic_dual_account_interpretation", "slug": "emic_etic_dual_account_interpretation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 4, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 4 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A phenomenon is being described by participants from within a practice and by observers through an external analytic framework, but the accounts are collapsed, ranked, translated, or averaged before the system has preserved what each account can see and what their divergence reveals.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A phenomenon is being described by participants from within a practice and by observers through an external analytic framework, but the accounts are collapsed, ranked, translated, or averaged before the system has preserved what each account can see and what their divergence reveals."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires non-reducible participant-competence and analyst-framework descriptions whose divergence is preserved as a result.", "role_mapping": "Participant categories -> emic scheme; analyst categories -> etic scheme; nonalignment -> nonreducibility.", "slug": "emic_and_etic", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b025_a01_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Local categories may be based on competence, role, ritual, relational obligation, tacit practice, identity, or context, while analytic categories may be based on theory, metric comparability, administrative need, or research design. In this condition set, the requirement is: Participant and analyst categories do not align one-to-one.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Participant categories and analyst categories do not line up one-to-one."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Emic And Etic", "one_liner": "A paired dual-description regime in which a phenomenon is captured under an insider scheme closed by participants' competence and an outsider scheme closed by analytic framework, with their divergence treated as a finding.", "page_ref": "prime:emic_and_etic", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Participant categories -> emic scheme; analyst categories -> etic scheme; nonalignment -> nonreducibility.", "slug": "emic_and_etic", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires non-reducible participant-competence and analyst-framework descriptions whose divergence is preserved as a result."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Participant and analyst categories do not align one-to-one.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P038-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve native categories or distinctions as the source scheme, not only external categories.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A participant-native category scheme contains distinctions meaningful within the practice.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a directed external coding, translation, measurement, taxonomy, or equivalent representation of the native scheme.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "An external representational operation is applied to that native scheme.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve possible loss or compression of native categorical distinctions without strengthening possibility to certainty.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The external operation may flatten distinctions among the native categories.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "An external representational operation may flatten native categories.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "External representation may erase distinctions in a native category scheme.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P038-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A proper emic/etic regime preserves both accounts and treats divergence as evidence rather than flattening the emic scheme.", "slug": "emic_and_etic"}], "residual_id": "r:emic_etic_dual_account_interpretation:b025_a01_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b025_a01_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The prime native_category_flattening is a major risk neighbor. In this condition set, the requirement is: External coding or translation may flatten native categories.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["External coding, translation, measurement, or taxonomy work may flatten native categories."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Holding the complete overcoding exact record and qualifier 'The relational structure severed by coding consists of distinctions in a participant-native category scheme.' fixed, I varied optional manifestations and found no complete instance that falsifies the selected DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Overcoding", "one_liner": "The qualitative-research failure mode where coding fragments material below the phenomenon's legibility grain, actively severing the sequence and relational structure that gave coded phrases their meaning — diagnosed by whether meaning can be reconstructed from the codes alone.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:overcoding", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "severed_structure_is_native_category_distinctions", "predicate": "The relational structure severed by coding consists of distinctions in a participant-native category scheme.", "rationale": "The candidate supplies the structural spine; the emitted qualifier is one anchored, atomic, non-restating fact sufficient for a complete DNF branch."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "overcoding"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "severed_structure_is_native_category_distinctions"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "overcoding", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P038-C15-U1", "why_it_fits": "Overcoding directly supplies an external coding operation that destroys participant-carried distinctions, but the lost structure can be narrative or sequential rather than categorical. One domain binding selects the native-category case."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "I varied optional manifestations within the complete thin_description exact record and found no instance that falsifies the selected DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Thin Description", "one_liner": "An ethnographic account that records the surface behaviour of an act but omits the contextual layers — participant meaning, social code, interpretive reasoning — a reader would need to recognise whether the act is the same kind of thing in a new setting, leaving the record true but analytically inert.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:thin_description", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "thin_description"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "thin_description", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P038-C15-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every complete thin-description instance omits participant meaning and social code needed to recognize what kind of act occurred. That directly entails an external representation erasing distinctions in a participant-native category scheme."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Holding the complete primitive_obsession exact record and qualifier 'The primitive representation is an externally imposed encoding of a participant-native category scheme.' fixed, I varied optional manifestations and found no complete instance that falsifies the selected DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Primitive Obsession", "one_liner": "The code smell of representing domain concepts that carry structural commitments — units, valid ranges, well-formedness, identity — as bare primitives like int or string, so the type system cannot enforce the distinctions and they survive only as validation duplicated at every callsite.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:primitive_obsession", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1", "O2"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "primitive_representation_encodes_native_categories_externally", "predicate": "The primitive representation is an externally imposed encoding of a participant-native category scheme.", "rationale": "The candidate supplies the structural spine; the emitted qualifier is one anchored, atomic, non-restating fact sufficient for a complete DNF branch."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "primitive_obsession"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "primitive_representation_encodes_native_categories_externally"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "primitive_obsession", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P038-C15-U1", "why_it_fits": "Primitive obsession directly requires representational flattening of structured domain distinctions, but software-native concepts need not be participant-native or externally represented relative to a practice. One relational domain binding supplies both ends of that native-scheme/external-encoding relation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "External coding or translation may flatten native categories.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires non-reducible participant-competence and analyst-framework descriptions whose divergence is preserved as a result.", "role_mapping": "Participant categories -> emic scheme; analyst categories -> etic scheme; nonalignment -> nonreducibility.", "slug": "emic_and_etic", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b025_a01_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Local categories may be based on competence, role, ritual, relational obligation, tacit practice, identity, or context, while analytic categories may be based on theory, metric comparability, administrative need, or research design. In this condition set, the requirement is: Participant and analyst categories do not align one-to-one.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Participant categories and analyst categories do not line up one-to-one."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Emic And Etic", "one_liner": "A paired dual-description regime in which a phenomenon is captured under an insider scheme closed by participants' competence and an outsider scheme closed by analytic framework, with their divergence treated as a finding.", "page_ref": "prime:emic_and_etic", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Participant categories -> emic scheme; analyst categories -> etic scheme; nonalignment -> nonreducibility.", "slug": "emic_and_etic", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires non-reducible participant-competence and analyst-framework descriptions whose divergence is preserved as a result."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Participant and analyst categories do not align one-to-one.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P039-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must contain an account-bearing testimony or analysis as the object evaluated.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The focal object is a testimony or analysis offered as an account of the phenomenon.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail rejection of the focal account, not merely criticism, comparison, or low confidence.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The focal account is dismissed or rejected.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must make insider or outsider source position sufficient for the rejection rather than an incidental correlate.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The account's source position alone is the stated basis for dismissal.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfying this branch must entail both insider provenance and dismissal specifically on the ground of subjectivity.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "In the insider branch, insider testimony is dismissed as merely subjective.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfying this branch must entail both external analytic provenance and rejection specifically on the ground of alienness.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "In the external branch, external analysis is rejected as merely alien.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Either insider testimony is dismissed as merely subjective because it is insider testimony, or external analysis is rejected as merely alien because it is externally positioned.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An account is dismissed merely because of its insider or external source position.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P039-C01-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime requires both descriptions and explicitly says neither alone is adequate.", "slug": "emic_and_etic"}], "residual_id": "r:emic_etic_dual_account_interpretation:b025_a01_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b025_a01_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The pattern protects both accounts by clarifying what each is competent to establish. In this condition set, the requirement is: Either insider testimony or external analysis is dismissed merely because of its source position.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Insider testimony is being dismissed as merely subjective or external analysis is being rejected as merely alien."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime requires both descriptions and explicitly says neither alone is adequate.", "slug": "emic_and_etic"}], "normalized_requirement": "Either insider testimony or external analysis is dismissed merely because of its source position.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Either insider testimony or external analysis is dismissed merely because of its source position.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires non-reducible participant-competence and analyst-framework descriptions whose divergence is preserved as a result.", "role_mapping": "Participant categories -> emic scheme; analyst categories -> etic scheme; nonalignment -> nonreducibility.", "slug": "emic_and_etic", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b025_a01_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Local categories may be based on competence, role, ritual, relational obligation, tacit practice, identity, or context, while analytic categories may be based on theory, metric comparability, administrative need, or research design. In this condition set, the requirement is: Participant and analyst categories do not align one-to-one.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Participant categories and analyst categories do not line up one-to-one."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Emic And Etic", "one_liner": "A paired dual-description regime in which a phenomenon is captured under an insider scheme closed by participants' competence and an outsider scheme closed by analytic framework, with their divergence treated as a finding.", "page_ref": "prime:emic_and_etic", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Participant categories -> emic scheme; analyst categories -> etic scheme; nonalignment -> nonreducibility.", "slug": "emic_and_etic", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires non-reducible participant-competence and analyst-framework descriptions whose divergence is preserved as a result."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Participant and analyst categories do not align one-to-one.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P039-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must hold behavior identity fixed across the two interpretations.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "One and the same observed behavior is interpreted in both frames.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must distinguish a participant-local practice frame from an external analytic-theory frame.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The two frames are local practice and external analytic theory.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must relate both frames to the meaning of the same behavior rather than to unrelated observations.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Each frame assigns meaning to the behavior.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail cross-frame meaning divergence, not merely the existence of two descriptions.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The meanings assigned by the two frames differ.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "The same observed behavior has different meanings under local practice and external analytic theory.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "One behavior has divergent meanings across local-practice and external-theory frames.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P039-C02-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The two descriptions can converge on the meaning of a particular behavior; divergence is informative when present but not mandatory.", "slug": "emic_and_etic"}], "residual_id": "r:emic_etic_dual_account_interpretation:b025_a01_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b025_a01_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The divergence can be a result, not a nuisance. In this condition set, the requirement is: The same behavior has different meanings under local practice and external theory.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The same observed behavior has different meanings under local practice and under analytic theory."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The two descriptions can converge on the meaning of a particular behavior; divergence is informative when present but not mandatory.", "slug": "emic_and_etic"}], "normalized_requirement": "The same behavior has different meanings under local practice and external theory.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The same behavior has different meanings under local practice and external theory.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires non-reducible participant-competence and analyst-framework descriptions whose divergence is preserved as a result.", "role_mapping": "Participant categories -> emic scheme; analyst categories -> etic scheme; nonalignment -> nonreducibility.", "slug": "emic_and_etic", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b025_a01_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Local categories may be based on competence, role, ritual, relational obligation, tacit practice, identity, or context, while analytic categories may be based on theory, metric comparability, administrative need, or research design. In this condition set, the requirement is: Participant and analyst categories do not align one-to-one.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Participant categories and analyst categories do not line up one-to-one."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Emic And Etic", "one_liner": "A paired dual-description regime in which a phenomenon is captured under an insider scheme closed by participants' competence and an outsider scheme closed by analytic framework, with their divergence treated as a finding.", "page_ref": "prime:emic_and_etic", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Participant categories -> emic scheme; analyst categories -> etic scheme; nonalignment -> nonreducibility.", "slug": "emic_and_etic", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires non-reducible participant-competence and analyst-framework descriptions whose divergence is preserved as a result."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Participant and analyst categories do not align one-to-one.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P039-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must contain a focal account and an alternative account subject to displacement.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "At least two competing accounts are present, one of which can displace the other.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail unequal power relevant to which account is adopted.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Power is asymmetric across the actors or institutions backing the accounts.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must make asymmetric power causally operative in officializing the favored account.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The power asymmetry enables one account to become official.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail default official status for one account relative to an alternative, not mere popularity.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "One account becomes the default official account and displaces an alternative.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail omission of the displaced account's lost information or meaning.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "What is lost through the displacement is not recorded.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Power asymmetry makes one account the default official account while the loss caused by displacing the other account goes unrecorded.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Asymmetric power officializes one account and leaves displacement loss unrecorded.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P039-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The method can be used where power is symmetric and neither account becomes official.", "slug": "emic_and_etic"}], "residual_id": "r:emic_etic_dual_account_interpretation:b025_a01_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b025_a01_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is common in policy, research, service design, institutional classification, and cross-cultural intervention. In this condition set, the requirement is: Power lets one account become official without recording what the displacement loses.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Power asymmetry lets one account become the default official account without recording what was lost."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The method can be used where power is symmetric and neither account becomes official.", "slug": "emic_and_etic"}], "normalized_requirement": "Power lets one account become official without recording what the displacement loses.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Power lets one account become official without recording what the displacement loses.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A decision requires both local fidelity and cross-case comparability.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The archetype is useful when neither participant self-description nor external classification alone is adequate. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: A decision requires both local fidelity and cross-case comparability. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A decision requires both local fidelity and cross-case comparability.", "The archetype is useful when neither participant self-description nor external classification alone is adequate."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "A decision requires both local fidelity and cross-case comparability."}, {"display_text": "Findings must be reported to audiences who need to know whether a claim is participant-grounded, analyst-inferred, or both.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The account provenance matters to later interpretation. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: Findings must be reported to audiences who need to know whether a claim is participant-grounded, analyst-inferred, or both. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Findings must be reported to audiences who need to know whether a claim is participant-grounded, analyst-inferred, or both.", "The account provenance matters to later interpretation."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "Findings must be reported to audiences who need to know whether a claim is participant-grounded, analyst-inferred, or both."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 25, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-025", "ledger_sha256": "76200b75a06e3248bfbf5261cecd9026514948c65649dc5ad83d7089e91d8f7d"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Empirical Cluster Discovery", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:empirical_cluster_discovery", "slug": "empirical_cluster_discovery"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 5, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A population may contain recurring similarity structure, but default labels are absent or untrustworthy and an algorithm can manufacture plausible-looking groups from arbitrary representation and metric choices.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A population may contain recurring similarity structure, but default labels are absent or untrustworthy and an algorithm can manufacture plausible-looking groups from arbitrary representation and metric choices."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Theoretical sampling can investigate a unique negative or deviant case and does not require recurrence across cases or domains.", "slug": "theoretical_sampling"}], "residual_id": "r:empirical_cluster_discovery:b025_a02_c1", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b025_a02_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The target condition recurs across cases or domains rather than appearing as a one-off exception. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The target condition recurs across cases or domains rather than appearing as a one-off exception."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Theoretical sampling can investigate a unique negative or deviant case and does not require recurrence across cases or domains.", "slug": "theoretical_sampling"}], "normalized_requirement": "A target condition recurs across cases or domains rather than appearing once.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A target condition recurs across cases or domains rather than appearing once.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P039-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must contain compensatory or workaround practices whose scope is local.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The focal practices are local workarounds.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must contain a structural relation beneath the local workaround behavior.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "An underlying structural relation is the object that could be revealed.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail failure of the workarounds to reveal the underlying relation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The local workarounds do not expose that structural relation.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve the workaround-to-revelation direction rather than merely saying the structure is obscure.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The failed exposure is directed from the workarounds toward discovery of the relation.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Local workarounds do not expose the underlying structural relation.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Local workaround practices fail to reveal an underlying structural relation.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P039-C04-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Clustering can be applied before any workaround exists and does not require local practice to obscure the relation.", "slug": "clustering"}], "residual_id": "r:empirical_cluster_discovery:b025_a02_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b025_a02_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Local workarounds do not expose the underlying structural relation. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Local workarounds do not expose the underlying structural relation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Clustering can be applied before any workaround exists and does not require local practice to obscure the relation.", "slug": "clustering"}], "normalized_requirement": "Local workarounds fail to expose an underlying structural relation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Local workarounds fail to expose an underlying structural relation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P039-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must contain a decision whose basis includes a specific assumption.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A decision and an assumption are the principal roles.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail that the assumption is a necessary basis for the consequential decision: without it, the decision would not be made or justified on the same grounds; mere relevance or support is insufficient.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The decision depends on the assumption.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must require material stakes or consequences for the focal decision.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The decision is consequential.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail that the assumption remains unstated or unarticulated.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The assumption is not explicit.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail absence of validation for the assumption.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The assumption is not validated.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must place both deficits before or during the consequential decision, not only in the past.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The lack of explicitness and validation holds at the time of decision dependence.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "A consequential decision currently depends on an assumption that is neither explicit nor validated.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A consequential decision depends on a currently implicit, unvalidated assumption.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P039-C05-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Analytic degrees of freedom can be fully disclosed and need not feed a consequential decision or one unstated assumption.", "slug": "researcher_degrees_of_freedom"}], "residual_id": "r:empirical_cluster_discovery:b025_a02_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b025_a02_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Consequential decisions depend on an assumption that is not yet explicit or validated. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Consequential decisions depend on an assumption that is not yet explicit or validated."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Analytic degrees of freedom can be fully disclosed and need not feed a consequential decision or one unstated assumption.", "slug": "researcher_degrees_of_freedom"}], "normalized_requirement": "A consequential decision depends on an implicit, unvalidated assumption.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A consequential decision depends on an implicit, unvalidated assumption.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The observed population lacks a reliable predefined label set and is represented in a chosen similarity space.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The observed population lacks a reliable predefined label set and is represented in a chosen similarity space.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "Plausible representation, metric, scale, or algorithm choices can manufacture different candidate partitions that require validation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Plausible representation, metric, scale, or algorithm choices can manufacture different candidate partitions that require validation.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The system needs a reusable intervention with monitoring, exception handling, and revision.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: The system needs a reusable intervention with monitoring, exception handling, and revision. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The system needs a reusable intervention with monitoring, exception handling, and revision."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The system needs a reusable intervention with monitoring, exception handling, and revision."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 25, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-025", "ledger_sha256": "76200b75a06e3248bfbf5261cecd9026514948c65649dc5ad83d7089e91d8f7d"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Enacted-Control Verification and Closure", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:enacted_control_verification_and_closure", "slug": "enacted_control_verification_and_closure"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A nominal control is documented and treated as effective, but assurance samples the documented form more than the enacted form. The result is a false control claim: managers, regulators, dashboards, or downstream systems believe a barrier exists even though real practice bypasses, weakens, substitutes, delays, or locally reinterprets it.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A nominal control is documented and treated as effective, but assurance samples the documented form more than the enacted form. The result is a false control claim: managers, regulators, dashboards, or downstream systems believe a barrier exists even though real practice bypasses, weakens, substitutes, delays, or locally reinterprets it."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires an assurance apparatus that samples the nominal register and is taken to certify the enacted register.", "role_mapping": "Documentary evidence -> nominal register; control owner assurance -> sampling mismatch.", "slug": "nominal_vs_actual_control", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b025_a03_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Evidence of effectiveness is mostly documentary, self-attested, or generated by the same group that owns the control. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Evidence of effectiveness is mostly documentary, self-attested, or generated by the same group that owns the control."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Nominal vs. Actual Control", "one_liner": "Every control exists as a documented nominal form and an enacted actual form, and the assurance apparatus usually samples only the former.", "page_ref": "prime:nominal_vs_actual_control", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Documentary evidence -> nominal register; control owner assurance -> sampling mismatch.", "slug": "nominal_vs_actual_control", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires an assurance apparatus that samples the nominal register and is taken to certify the enacted register."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Evidence of control effectiveness is documentary, self-attested, or produced by the control owner.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The enacted-practice register explicitly includes variable inputs, time pressure, exceptional cases, and unwritten know-how absent from the prescribed model.", "role_mapping": "Nominal procedure -> prescriptive artifact; operating conditions -> enacted practice.", "slug": "procedure_work_mismatch", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b025_a03_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Actual work happens under load, time pressure, exception handling, degraded tooling, handoffs, maintenance windows, or local constraints not represented in the nominal procedure. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Actual work happens under load, time pressure, exception handling, degraded tooling, handoffs, maintenance windows, or local constraints not represented in the nominal procedure."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Procedure-Work Mismatch", "one_liner": "A system's prescribed model of how work happens diverges systematically from how work is actually done, with the gap often load-bearing for performance, so the question is how the gap is managed rather than whether it can be eliminated.", "page_ref": "prime:procedure_work_mismatch", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Nominal procedure -> prescriptive artifact; operating conditions -> enacted practice.", "slug": "procedure_work_mismatch", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The enacted-practice register explicitly includes variable inputs, time pressure, exceptional cases, and unwritten know-how absent from the prescribed model."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Actual work occurs under load, time pressure, exceptions, degraded tooling, handoffs, maintenance, or local constraints omitted from the nominal procedure.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires a load-bearing gap silently bridged by tacit operator adaptation.", "role_mapping": "Workarounds and tacit expertise -> adaptation bridging the procedure-work gap.", "slug": "procedure_work_mismatch", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b025_a03_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Operators maintain performance through workarounds, tacit expertise, informal coordination, reserve consumption, or exception paths. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Operators maintain performance through workarounds, tacit expertise, informal coordination, reserve consumption, or exception paths."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Procedure-Work Mismatch", "one_liner": "A system's prescribed model of how work happens diverges systematically from how work is actually done, with the gap often load-bearing for performance, so the question is how the gap is managed rather than whether it can be eliminated.", "page_ref": "prime:procedure_work_mismatch", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Workarounds and tacit expertise -> adaptation bridging the procedure-work gap.", "slug": "procedure_work_mismatch", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires a load-bearing gap silently bridged by tacit operator adaptation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Operators preserve performance through workarounds, tacit expertise, informal coordination, reserves, or exception paths.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A high-stakes control, safeguard, approval, checklist, alarm, access rule, interlock, monitoring step, or separation-of-duties rule is being relied on for safety, compliance, security, quality, or risk reduction.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: A high-stakes control, safeguard, approval, checklist, alarm, access rule, interlock, monitoring step, or separation-of-duties rule is being relied on for safety, compliance, security, quality, or risk reduction. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A high-stakes control, safeguard, approval, checklist, alarm, access rule, interlock, monitoring step, or separation-of-duties rule is being relied on for safety, compliance, security, quality, or risk reduction."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "A high-stakes control, safeguard, approval, checklist, alarm, access rule, interlock, monitoring step, or separation-of-duties rule is being relied on for safety, compliance, security, quality, or risk reduction."}, {"display_text": "A near miss, audit finding, incident, unexplained metric drift, or recurring waiver suggests the control may not operate as imagined.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: A near miss, audit finding, incident, unexplained metric drift, or recurring waiver suggests the control may not operate as imagined. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A near miss, audit finding, incident, unexplained metric drift, or recurring waiver suggests the control may not operate as imagined."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "A near miss, audit finding, incident, unexplained metric drift, or recurring waiver suggests the control may not operate as imagined."}, {"display_text": "The organization has incentives to preserve the appearance of control, such as compliance deadlines, customer certification, production pressure, or liability exposure.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The organization needs stable control claims, while operators need workable practice. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The organization has incentives to preserve the appearance of control, such as compliance deadlines, customer certification, production pressure, or liability exposure. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The organization has incentives to preserve the appearance of control, such as compliance deadlines, customer certification, production pressure, or liability exposure.", "The organization needs stable control claims, while operators need workable practice."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The organization has incentives to preserve the appearance of control, such as compliance deadlines, customer certification, production pressure, or liability exposure."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 25, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-025", "ledger_sha256": "76200b75a06e3248bfbf5261cecd9026514948c65649dc5ad83d7089e91d8f7d"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Encapsulated Substitutability", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:encapsulated_substitutability", "slug": "encapsulated_substitutability"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 1 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 1}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system wants to replace, rotate, procure, upgrade, fail over to, or experimentally swap a component, but the surrounding system depends on undocumented behaviors, context assumptions, state formats, performance envelopes, side effects, or identity-specific quirks that make substitution risky.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system wants to replace, rotate, procure, upgrade, fail over to, or experimentally swap a component, but the surrounding system depends on undocumented behaviors, context assumptions, state formats, performance envelopes, side effects, or identity-specific quirks that make substitution risky."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P039-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must contain a role or component boundary represented by an interface.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A role and its formal interface are present.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must include behavior that is load-bearing rather than incidental.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Behavior important to the role's operation is present.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail omission of the important behavior from the interface contract.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The formal interface fails to specify the important behavior.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve coexistence of a formal interface and an uncaptured behavioral requirement.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The interface exists despite the behavioral contract remaining non-explicit.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "A role has a formal interface, but the interface does not capture important behavioral requirements.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A formal role interface omits a load-bearing behavioral contract.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P039-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Substitutability requires an implementation-independent functional specification whose conforming swaps preserve performance, the opposite of an implicit contract.", "slug": "substitutability"}], "residual_id": "r:encapsulated_substitutability:b025_a04_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b025_a04_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A role has an interface but important behavior is still implicit, informal, hidden in implementation, or learned through convention. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A role has an interface but important behavior is still implicit, informal, hidden in implementation, or learned through convention."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Without the bridge, a purpose statement could be described merely as doctrine. The general artifact-role relation establishes that a governing statement constraining delegated action functions as a behavioral interface.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_BRIDGE", "name": "Commander's-Intent Ambiguity", "one_liner": "Locate incoherent decentralized execution in the purpose artefact one level up: when delegated subordinates must re-derive action under changed conditions but the intent statement is too imprecise to disambiguate their choice, locally rational actions aggregate into globally incoherent outcomes.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:commanders_intent_ambiguity", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "TYPE_SUBSUMPTION", "kind": "INTERPRETIVE_BRIDGE", "normalized_key": "governing_purpose_artifact_is_behavioral_interface", "predicate": "A governing purpose artifact that constrains a delegated role's actions is a formal behavioral interface for that role.", "rationale": "The candidate supplies the relational spine, and the single type bridge is generally true outside this edge and introduces no independent fact."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "commanders_intent_ambiguity"}, {"kind": "INTERPRETIVE_BRIDGE", "value": "governing_purpose_artifact_is_behavioral_interface"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "commanders_intent_ambiguity", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P039-C07-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record universally contains a delegated actor governed by a purpose artifact that omits behavior needed under changed conditions. One general type-subsumption bridge supplies only the interface type."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "An accessor-only immutable record is a legitimate data class and omits no owned behavior, so the unguarded candidate is too broad; the anaemic-entity branch supplies the missing contract.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Data Class", "one_liner": "Flag an object-oriented class that holds fields with getters and setters but no domain methods as a symptom that its behavior migrated outward into consumers, then resolve the verdict with one role question — should this class enforce its own invariants?", "page_ref": "domain_specific:data_class", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2", "O3", "O4"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "accessor_only_class_is_anaemic_entity", "predicate": "The accessor-only class is an anaemic domain entity rather than a legitimate record type.", "rationale": "The candidate supplies the relational spine, and one candidate-anchored atomic context guard fills every remaining gap without restating the head."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "data_class"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "accessor_only_class_is_anaemic_entity"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "data_class", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P039-C07-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record explicitly distinguishes legitimate records from anaemic entities. One branch-selection fact chooses the pathological branch, after which the omitted owned invariants and outward-migrated behavior satisfy the remaining obligations."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A role has an interface but important behavior remains implicit, informal, or implementation-hidden.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Multiple components, providers, implementations, people, models, suppliers, or procedures could plausibly occupy the same role.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: Multiple components, providers, implementations, people, models, suppliers, or procedures could plausibly occupy the same role. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Multiple components, providers, implementations, people, models, suppliers, or procedures could plausibly occupy the same role."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "Multiple components, providers, implementations, people, models, suppliers, or procedures could plausibly occupy the same role."}, {"display_text": "The surrounding system needs continuity while components are upgraded, replaced, tested, procured, redeployed, or failed over.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system wants to replace, rotate, procure, upgrade, fail over to, or experimentally swap a component, but the surrounding system depends on undocumented behaviors, context assumptions, state formats, performance envelopes, side effects, or identity-specific quirks that make substitution risky. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: The surrounding system needs continuity while components are upgraded, replaced, tested, procured, redeployed, or failed over. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The surrounding system needs continuity while components are upgraded, replaced, tested, procured, redeployed, or failed over.", "A system wants to replace, rotate, procure, upgrade, fail over to, or experimentally swap a component, but the surrounding system depends on undocumented behaviors, context assumptions, state formats, performance envelopes, side effects, or identity-specific quirks that make substitution risky."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "The surrounding system needs continuity while components are upgraded, replaced, tested, procured, redeployed, or failed over."}, {"display_text": "Substitution failure would cause service degradation, data loss, broken commitments, safety risk, customer disruption, or inconsistent measurements.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Substitution failure would cause service degradation, data loss, broken commitments, safety risk, customer disruption, or inconsistent measurements. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Substitution failure would cause service degradation, data loss, broken commitments, safety risk, customer disruption, or inconsistent measurements."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Substitution failure would cause service degradation, data loss, broken commitments, safety risk, customer disruption, or inconsistent measurements."}, {"display_text": "A system is trying to reduce vendor lock-in, common-mode fragility, specialized dependency, or lifecycle brittleness.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: A system is trying to reduce vendor lock-in, common-mode fragility, specialized dependency, or lifecycle brittleness. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A system is trying to reduce vendor lock-in, common-mode fragility, specialized dependency, or lifecycle brittleness."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "A system is trying to reduce vendor lock-in, common-mode fragility, specialized dependency, or lifecycle brittleness."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 25, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-025", "ledger_sha256": "76200b75a06e3248bfbf5261cecd9026514948c65649dc5ad83d7089e91d8f7d"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Encoding–Retrieval Context Alignment", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:encoding_retrieval_context_alignment", "slug": "encoding_retrieval_context_alignment"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 2 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 2}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Knowledge, an intention, or a procedure is encoded under one bundle of contextual features but must later be retrieved under another. Incidental features become part of the access key; the target context omits or changes them, or supplies similar cues linked to competing traces. The result is context-bound fluency: performance looks strong during training or recognition but collapses at the moment of independent use.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Knowledge, an intention, or a procedure is encoded under one bundle of contextual features but must later be retrieved under another. Incidental features become part of the access key; the target context omits or changes them, or supplies similar cues linked to competing traces. The result is context-bound fluency: performance looks strong during training or recognition but collapses at the moment of independent use."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires distinguishable preparation and deployment environments with a structured non-random gap.", "role_mapping": "Training setting -> preparation environment; operational setting -> deployment environment.", "slug": "training_serving_skew", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b025_a05_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Training, documentation, or rehearsal occurs in a setting unlike the operational setting. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Training, documentation, or rehearsal occurs in a setting unlike the operational setting."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Training Serving Skew", "one_liner": "A system prepared in one environment silently underperforms in a systematically different one.", "page_ref": "prime:training_serving_skew", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Training setting -> preparation environment; operational setting -> deployment environment.", "slug": "training_serving_skew", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires distinguishable preparation and deployment environments with a structured non-random gap."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Training, documentation, or rehearsal occurs in a systematically different setting from use.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires preserved preparation competence and degraded performance in the systematically different deployment environment.", "role_mapping": "Original cues -> preparation environment; changed context -> deployment; performance gap -> skew.", "slug": "training_serving_skew", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The reinstatement signature requires identical stored items to be differentially accessible under different retrieval-context feature overlap.", "role_mapping": "Original cues -> encoding-feature overlap; changed context -> reduced overlap.", "slug": "encoding_specificity", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b025_a05_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Users perform well with the original wording, instructor, interface, room, sequence, or examples but not after a context change. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Users perform well with the original wording, instructor, interface, room, sequence, or examples but not after a context change."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Training Serving Skew", "one_liner": "A system prepared in one environment silently underperforms in a systematically different one.", "page_ref": "prime:training_serving_skew", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Original cues -> preparation environment; changed context -> deployment; performance gap -> skew.", "slug": "training_serving_skew", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires preserved preparation competence and degraded performance in the systematically different deployment environment."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Encoding Specificity", "one_liner": "Retrievability depends on the overlap between features active at encoding and features available at retrieval, because context is co-encoded into the storage key.", "page_ref": "prime:encoding_specificity", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Original cues -> encoding-feature overlap; changed context -> reduced overlap.", "slug": "encoding_specificity", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The reinstatement signature requires identical stored items to be differentially accessible under different retrieval-context feature overlap."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Performance succeeds with original contextual cues but degrades after context change.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The retrieval moment is time-pressured, noisy, emotionally different, interrupted, or missing familiar prompts.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The retrieval moment is time-pressured, noisy, emotionally different, interrupted, or missing familiar prompts. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The retrieval moment is time-pressured, noisy, emotionally different, interrupted, or missing familiar prompts."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "The retrieval moment is time-pressured, noisy, emotionally different, interrupted, or missing familiar prompts."}, {"display_text": "Several similar procedures or concepts compete for the same broad cue.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Several similar procedures or concepts compete for the same broad cue. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Several similar procedures or concepts compete for the same broad cue."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Several similar procedures or concepts compete for the same broad cue."}, {"display_text": "A future environment, interface, role, language, or representation is expected to change.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this deployment constraint: A future environment, interface, role, language, or representation is expected to change. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A future environment, interface, role, language, or representation is expected to change."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "A future environment, interface, role, language, or representation is expected to change."}, {"display_text": "The cost of forgotten or substituted information is high enough to require transfer testing or fallback.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The cost of forgotten or substituted information is high enough to require transfer testing or fallback. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The cost of forgotten or substituted information is high enough to require transfer testing or fallback."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The cost of forgotten or substituted information is high enough to require transfer testing or fallback."}, {"display_text": "A support is being removed on the assumption that learning has become independent of it.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: A support is being removed on the assumption that learning has become independent of it. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A support is being removed on the assumption that learning has become independent of it."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "A support is being removed on the assumption that learning has become independent of it."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 25, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-025", "ledger_sha256": "76200b75a06e3248bfbf5261cecd9026514948c65649dc5ad83d7089e91d8f7d"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": [{"groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Selective questioning about several event details is RIF and has the cue competition but need not involve concepts; restricting the existing competitor set to category concepts removes exactly that type counterexample.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Retrieval-Induced Forgetting", "one_liner": "Recast retrieval as a selection operation in a competitive field: actively recalling some items from a shared-cue set inhibits the related-but-unretrieved competitors, leaving them measurably less recallable than if nothing had been practiced at all.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:retrieval_induced_forgetting", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O6"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "competitor_set_consists_of_stored_concepts", "predicate": "The shared-cue competitor set consists of stored category concepts.", "rationale": "The candidate supplies the relational spine, and one candidate-anchored atomic context guard fills every remaining gap without restating the head."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "retrieval_induced_forgetting"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "competitor_set_consists_of_stored_concepts"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "retrieval_induced_forgetting", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P039-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "With one candidate-anchored concept-domain restriction, RIF entails all shared-cue competition obligations in the concept DNF branch."}], "publication_role": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT_ONLY", "source_residual_occurrence_id": "r:encoding_retrieval_context_alignment:b025_a05_c4", "unit": {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P039-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail more than one competing stored item.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Several stored items are present.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail similarity among the items, not arbitrary plurality.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The competing stored items are similar to one another.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must contain a shared retrieval cue whose breadth permits multiple items to answer it.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "One and the same broad retrieval cue addresses the stored items.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail cue-mediated competition among the items rather than mere co-storage.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The similar stored items compete for that cue.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfying this branch must type the competing items as procedures.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "In one branch, the competing stored items are procedures.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfying this branch must type the competing items as concepts.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "In one branch, the competing stored items are concepts.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Several similar procedures or several similar concepts compete for the same broad retrieval cue.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Multiple similar stored items compete for one broad retrieval cue.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P039-C09-U1"}}]}
{"archetype": {"name": "Enculturation Pathway Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:enculturation_pathway_design", "slug": "enculturation_pathway_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 6, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 7, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 7 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 6 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 7}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Culture is already being taught, but the teaching system is implicit. Incumbents distribute access through proximity, affinity, informal invitation, correction, sanction, storytelling, role assignment, and recognition. Newcomers who resemble insiders or secure a strong sponsor receive dense evidence about how the culture actually works. Others receive abstract declarations and discover exceptions only after violating them.\n\nThis creates four coupled failures. First, the cultural payload is ambiguous: declared values, enacted incentives, tacit routines, and boundary cases do not line up. Second, the learning route is unequal: observation and consequential practice depend on social access rather than transparent readiness. Third, interpretation is concentrated: one mentor or dominant subgroup becomes the arbiter of what the culture means. Fourth, competence is mismeasured: surface fluency and obedience substitute for transferable judgment.\n\nThe deeper problem is that enculturation contains both continuity and change. A group needs enough continuity for coordinated action and shared meaning, yet it also needs newcomers to notice what incumbents normalize. A pathway that only reproduces the past becomes cultural lock-in. A pathway that only invites critique without teaching situated practice fails to transmit the capabilities that make participation possible.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Newcomers are expected to act with culturally situated judgment but receive only abstract rules, branding language, or isolated correction. Tacit norms are transmitted unevenly through favored relationships, unspoken tests, imitation, rituals, stories, sanctions, and informal access. They may learn surface compliance without reasons, overfit one mentor's style, internalize harmful customs, or remain permanently peripheral because no staged route to legitimate participation and autonomy exists."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P039-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must type the actors as newcomers or new members to a practice or group.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The needing actors are new members.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail a requirement for practical judgment, not merely exposure to information.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The new members need practical judgment.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must concern situated judgment in practice rather than only declarative knowledge.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The required capacity is practical judgment.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail that complete codification is impossible, while allowing partial codification.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The practical judgment cannot be fully codified.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "New members need practical judgment that cannot be fully codified.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Newcomers require practical judgment that is not fully codifiable.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P039-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Enculturation includes explicit and implicit cultural learning but does not require task-specific practical judgment that is impossible to codify.", "slug": "enculturation"}], "residual_id": "r:enculturation_pathway_design:b025_a06_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b025_a06_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when membership requires tacit judgment that cannot be learned reliably from documentation alone. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: New members need practical judgment that cannot be fully codified.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["New members need practical judgment that cannot be fully codified.", "Use this archetype when membership requires tacit judgment that cannot be learned reliably from documentation alone."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Enculturation includes explicit and implicit cultural learning but does not require task-specific practical judgment that is impossible to codify.", "slug": "enculturation"}], "normalized_requirement": "New members need practical judgment that cannot be fully codified.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "New members need practical judgment that cannot be fully codified.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P039-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must contain explicit normative statements attributable to a group.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The first comparison term is a group's written or espoused values.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must contain enacted behavior observed for the group associated with the values.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The second comparison term is the same group's observed behavior.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail mismatch between the value claims and enacted behavior, not mere coexistence.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The written values and observed behavior diverge.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "A group's written values diverge from its observed behavior.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Espoused written values diverge from enacted group behavior.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P039-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A culture's explicit and implicit channels can reinforce the same norms without written-behavior divergence.", "slug": "enculturation"}], "residual_id": "r:enculturation_pathway_design:b025_a06_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b025_a06_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Written values and observed behavior diverge. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Written values and observed behavior diverge."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A culture's explicit and implicit channels can reinforce the same norms without written-behavior divergence.", "slug": "enculturation"}], "normalized_requirement": "Written values diverge from observed group behavior.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Written values diverge from observed group behavior.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P039-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must type the actors as newcomers or new members to a practice or group.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The needing actors are new members.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail a requirement for practical judgment, not merely exposure to information.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The new members need practical judgment.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must concern situated judgment in practice rather than only declarative knowledge.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The required capacity is practical judgment.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail that complete codification is impossible, while allowing partial codification.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The practical judgment cannot be fully codified.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "New members need practical judgment that cannot be fully codified.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Newcomers require practical judgment that is not fully codifiable.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P039-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Enculturation includes explicit and implicit cultural learning but does not require task-specific practical judgment that is impossible to codify.", "slug": "enculturation"}], "residual_id": "r:enculturation_pathway_design:b025_a06_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b025_a06_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when membership requires tacit judgment that cannot be learned reliably from documentation alone. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: New members need practical judgment that cannot be fully codified.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["New members need practical judgment that cannot be fully codified.", "Use this archetype when membership requires tacit judgment that cannot be learned reliably from documentation alone."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Enculturation includes explicit and implicit cultural learning but does not require task-specific practical judgment that is impossible to codify.", "slug": "enculturation"}], "normalized_requirement": "New members need practical judgment that cannot be fully codified.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "New members need practical judgment that cannot be fully codified.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P039-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must concern acquisition of cultural norms, practices, or situated cultural knowledge.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The dependent process is cultural learning.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must contain a person or relationship that transmits the relevant culture, not merely a technical resource.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The dependency target is an interpersonal cultural sponsor or transmitter.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail a dependence relation from cultural learning to the focal source.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Cultural learning depends on that source.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail single-source concentration rather than support from a distributed network.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The dependence is concentrated on one source.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail substantial or load-bearing dependence, not merely some influence.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The degree of dependence is heavy.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}], "predicate": "Cultural learning depends heavily on one focal cultural sponsor or transmitter.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Cultural learning is heavily dependent on one relationship source.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P039-C13-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact process requires a diverse network of parents, peers, teachers, and institutions rather than single-sponsor dependence.", "slug": "enculturation"}], "residual_id": "r:enculturation_pathway_design:b025_a06_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b025_a06_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Cultural learning depends heavily on one sponsor, family member, elder, or manager. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Cultural learning depends heavily on one sponsor, family member, elder, or manager."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact process requires a diverse network of parents, peers, teachers, and institutions rather than single-sponsor dependence.", "slug": "enculturation"}], "normalized_requirement": "Cultural learning depends heavily on one sponsor, elder, family member, or manager.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Cultural learning depends heavily on one sponsor, elder, family member, or manager.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P039-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must type the actors as newcomers or new members to a practice or group.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The needing actors are new members.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail a requirement for practical judgment, not merely exposure to information.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The new members need practical judgment.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must concern situated judgment in practice rather than only declarative knowledge.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The required capacity is practical judgment.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail that complete codification is impossible, while allowing partial codification.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The practical judgment cannot be fully codified.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "New members need practical judgment that cannot be fully codified.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Newcomers require practical judgment that is not fully codifiable.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P039-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Enculturation includes explicit and implicit cultural learning but does not require task-specific practical judgment that is impossible to codify.", "slug": "enculturation"}], "residual_id": "r:enculturation_pathway_design:b025_a06_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b025_a06_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when membership requires tacit judgment that cannot be learned reliably from documentation alone. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: New members need practical judgment that cannot be fully codified.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["New members need practical judgment that cannot be fully codified.", "Use this archetype when membership requires tacit judgment that cannot be learned reliably from documentation alone."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Enculturation includes explicit and implicit cultural learning but does not require task-specific practical judgment that is impossible to codify.", "slug": "enculturation"}], "normalized_requirement": "New members need practical judgment that cannot be fully codified.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "New members need practical judgment that cannot be fully codified.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P039-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must type the punished actor as new to the group or practice.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The person who errs and is punished is a newcomer.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must contain a newcomer error rather than mere nonconformity without error.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "An error by the newcomer is the occasion for the response.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail a punitive response directed at the newcomer because of the error.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The newcomer is punished for the error.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail absence of prior modeling relevant to avoiding the punished error.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Relevant behavior was not modeled before the punishment.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail absence of prior feedback relevant to avoiding or correcting the punished error.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Relevant feedback was not provided before the punishment.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must place the two instructional absences before punishment, not only after it.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The missing modeling and feedback are prior to the punitive response.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "Newcomer errors are punished even though neither modeling nor feedback was provided beforehand.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Newcomers are punished for errors without prior modeling or feedback.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P039-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Enculturation can proceed through observational learning and reinforcement without punitive error handling.", "slug": "enculturation"}], "residual_id": "r:enculturation_pathway_design:b025_a06_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b025_a06_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Typical signals include repeated newcomer confusion despite complete manuals, unequal access to informal knowledge, contradictory modeling by incumbents, dependence on one sponsor, cultural mistakes punished without prior practice, or values that are celebrated in orientation but absent from real incentives. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Newcomer errors are punished without prior modeling or feedback.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Newcomer errors are punished without prior modeling or feedback.", "Typical signals include repeated newcomer confusion despite complete manuals, unequal access to informal knowledge, contradictory modeling by incumbents, dependence on one sponsor, cultural mistakes punished without prior practice, or values that are celebrated in orientation but absent from real incentives."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Enculturation can proceed through observational learning and reinforcement without punitive error handling.", "slug": "enculturation"}], "normalized_requirement": "Newcomer errors are punished without prior modeling or feedback.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Newcomer errors are punished without prior modeling or feedback.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P039-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must type the actors as newcomers or new members to a practice or group.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The needing actors are new members.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail a requirement for practical judgment, not merely exposure to information.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The new members need practical judgment.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must concern situated judgment in practice rather than only declarative knowledge.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The required capacity is practical judgment.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail that complete codification is impossible, while allowing partial codification.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The practical judgment cannot be fully codified.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "New members need practical judgment that cannot be fully codified.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Newcomers require practical judgment that is not fully codifiable.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P039-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Enculturation includes explicit and implicit cultural learning but does not require task-specific practical judgment that is impossible to codify.", "slug": "enculturation"}], "residual_id": "r:enculturation_pathway_design:b025_a06_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b025_a06_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when membership requires tacit judgment that cannot be learned reliably from documentation alone. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: New members need practical judgment that cannot be fully codified.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["New members need practical judgment that cannot be fully codified.", "Use this archetype when membership requires tacit judgment that cannot be learned reliably from documentation alone."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Enculturation includes explicit and implicit cultural learning but does not require task-specific practical judgment that is impossible to codify.", "slug": "enculturation"}], "normalized_requirement": "New members need practical judgment that cannot be fully codified.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "New members need practical judgment that cannot be fully codified.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P039-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must contain an existing ritual whose function concerns belonging.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An enacted belonging ritual is present.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must use participant skill or competence as the relation's outcome.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Skill development is the focal participation outcome.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail absence of a ritual-to-skill connection, not merely a weak connection.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The belonging ritual does not connect to skill development.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Belonging rituals exist but do not connect participants to skill development.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Belonging ritual is disconnected from skill development.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P039-C15-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P039-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must contain an existing ritual whose function concerns belonging.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An enacted belonging ritual is present.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must use participant autonomy as the relation's outcome.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Participant autonomy is the focal participation outcome.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail absence of a ritual-to-autonomy connection, not merely delayed autonomy.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The belonging ritual does not connect to participant autonomy.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Belonging rituals exist but do not connect participants to autonomy.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Belonging ritual is disconnected from participant autonomy.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P039-C15-U2"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P039-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must contain an existing ritual whose function concerns belonging.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An enacted belonging ritual is present.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must use reciprocal contribution by participants as the relation's outcome.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Reciprocal contribution is the focal participation outcome.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail absence of a ritual-to-contribution connection, not merely low contribution.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The belonging ritual does not connect to reciprocal contribution.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Belonging rituals exist but do not connect participants to reciprocal contribution.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Belonging ritual is disconnected from reciprocal contribution.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P039-C15-U3"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A liminal ritual can successfully transform status and connect to competent participation.", "slug": "liminality"}], "residual_id": "r:enculturation_pathway_design:b025_a06_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b025_a06_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Belonging rituals exist but do not connect to skill, autonomy, or reciprocal contribution. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Belonging rituals exist but do not connect to skill, autonomy, or reciprocal contribution."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 3, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 3}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A liminal ritual can successfully transform status and connect to competent participation.", "slug": "liminality"}], "normalized_requirement": "Belonging rituals fail to connect to skill, autonomy, or reciprocal contribution.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 3 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Belonging rituals fail to connect to skill, autonomy, or reciprocal contribution.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B5", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P039-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must type the actors as newcomers or new members to a practice or group.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The needing actors are new members.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail a requirement for practical judgment, not merely exposure to information.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The new members need practical judgment.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must concern situated judgment in practice rather than only declarative knowledge.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The required capacity is practical judgment.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail that complete codification is impossible, while allowing partial codification.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The practical judgment cannot be fully codified.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "New members need practical judgment that cannot be fully codified.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Newcomers require practical judgment that is not fully codifiable.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P039-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Enculturation includes explicit and implicit cultural learning but does not require task-specific practical judgment that is impossible to codify.", "slug": "enculturation"}], "residual_id": "r:enculturation_pathway_design:b025_a06_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b025_a06_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when membership requires tacit judgment that cannot be learned reliably from documentation alone. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: New members need practical judgment that cannot be fully codified.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["New members need practical judgment that cannot be fully codified.", "Use this archetype when membership requires tacit judgment that cannot be learned reliably from documentation alone."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Enculturation includes explicit and implicit cultural learning but does not require task-specific practical judgment that is impossible to codify.", "slug": "enculturation"}], "normalized_requirement": "New members need practical judgment that cannot be fully codified.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "New members need practical judgment that cannot be fully codified.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P040-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must contain members successfully performing the focal norms under supervision.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Members perform focal norms in supervised settings.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must compare supervised performance with application to genuinely novel cases.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Novel cases outside the supervised performance setting are encountered.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail failed transfer, not merely reduced confidence or slower performance.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The members cannot transfer the same norms to those novel cases.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve the within-actor, within-norm contrast rather than compare unrelated groups or behaviors.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Supervised performance contrasts with novel-case transfer for the same members and norms.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Members perform norms in supervised settings but cannot transfer the same norms to novel cases.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Members who perform norms under supervision cannot transfer the same norms to novel cases.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P040-C01-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Enculturated dispositions can generalize fluently to new situations; supervised-to-novel transfer failure is not mandatory.", "slug": "enculturation"}], "residual_id": "r:enculturation_pathway_design:b025_a06_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b025_a06_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Members perform norms in supervised settings but cannot transfer them to novel cases. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Members perform norms in supervised settings but cannot transfer them to novel cases."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Enculturated dispositions can generalize fluently to new situations; supervised-to-novel transfer failure is not mandatory.", "slug": "enculturation"}], "normalized_requirement": "Members perform norms under supervision but cannot transfer them to novel cases.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Members perform norms under supervision but cannot transfer them to novel cases.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 5", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B6", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P039-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must type the actors as newcomers or new members to a practice or group.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The needing actors are new members.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail a requirement for practical judgment, not merely exposure to information.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The new members need practical judgment.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must concern situated judgment in practice rather than only declarative knowledge.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The required capacity is practical judgment.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail that complete codification is impossible, while allowing partial codification.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The practical judgment cannot be fully codified.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "New members need practical judgment that cannot be fully codified.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Newcomers require practical judgment that is not fully codifiable.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P039-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Enculturation includes explicit and implicit cultural learning but does not require task-specific practical judgment that is impossible to codify.", "slug": "enculturation"}], "residual_id": "r:enculturation_pathway_design:b025_a06_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b025_a06_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when membership requires tacit judgment that cannot be learned reliably from documentation alone. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: New members need practical judgment that cannot be fully codified.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["New members need practical judgment that cannot be fully codified.", "Use this archetype when membership requires tacit judgment that cannot be learned reliably from documentation alone."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Enculturation includes explicit and implicit cultural learning but does not require task-specific practical judgment that is impossible to codify.", "slug": "enculturation"}], "normalized_requirement": "New members need practical judgment that cannot be fully codified.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "New members need practical judgment that cannot be fully codified.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P040-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must contain an unwritten or hidden curriculum rather than an openly stated access rule.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A hidden curriculum governs access to the focal learning or participation opportunity.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail unequal access, not merely different preferences or outcomes after equal access.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Access to the focal opportunity is unequal across people or groups.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve the causal direction from hidden curriculum to access inequality.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The hidden curriculum creates the unequal access.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfying this branch must make identity the selected axis of access inequality.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The unequal access is linked to identity.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfying this branch must make location the selected axis of access inequality.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The unequal access is linked to location.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfying this branch must make schedule the selected axis of access inequality.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The unequal access is linked to schedule.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfying this branch must make social similarity the selected axis of access inequality.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The unequal access is linked to social similarity.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A hidden curriculum causes unequal access along at least one listed axis.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A hidden curriculum causes unequal access along one listed axis.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P040-C02-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Enculturation can be broadly accessible and need not produce identity- or resource-linked exclusion.", "slug": "enculturation"}], "residual_id": "r:enculturation_pathway_design:b025_a06_c7", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b025_a06_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Hidden curriculum creates unequal access by identity, location, schedule, or social similarity. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Hidden curriculum creates unequal access by identity, location, schedule, or social similarity."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Enculturation can be broadly accessible and need not produce identity- or resource-linked exclusion.", "slug": "enculturation"}], "normalized_requirement": "A hidden curriculum creates unequal access by identity, location, schedule, or social similarity.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A hidden curriculum creates unequal access by identity, location, schedule, or social similarity.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 6", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A community wants continuity without freezing harmful or obsolete practices.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful in professions, clinical practice, communities of practice, volunteer networks, religious or civic groups, distributed technical communities, intergenerational settings, and cross-cultural integration. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: A community wants continuity without freezing harmful or obsolete practices. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A community wants continuity without freezing harmful or obsolete practices.", "It is especially useful in professions, clinical practice, communities of practice, volunteer networks, religious or civic groups, distributed technical communities, intergenerational settings, and cross-cultural integration."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 8, "text": "A community wants continuity without freezing harmful or obsolete practices."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 25, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-025", "ledger_sha256": "76200b75a06e3248bfbf5261cecd9026514948c65649dc5ad83d7089e91d8f7d"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Endogenous-Pie Payoff Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:endogenous_pie_payoff_design", "slug": "endogenous_pie_payoff_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Actors are locked into a strategic interaction where their choices jointly determine total value, but the interaction is framed, governed, or incentivized as if the payoff were fixed. This causes missed gains, defensive non-cooperation, destructive rivalry, free riding, opportunistic capture, externalized harms, or negative-sum escalation.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Actors are locked into a strategic interaction where their choices jointly determine total value, but the interaction is framed, governed, or incentivized as if the payoff were fixed. This causes missed gains, defensive non-cooperation, destructive rivalry, free riding, opportunistic capture, externalized harms, or negative-sum escalation."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires joint payoff to vary as a function of the strategy profile.", "role_mapping": "Actors -> players; combined choices -> strategy profile; total value -> joint payoff.", "slug": "non_zero_sum_game", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b025_a07_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Two or more actors can choose strategies whose combined effects change total value rather than merely transfer value. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Two or more actors can choose strategies whose combined effects change total value rather than merely transfer value."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Non-Zero-Sum Game", "one_liner": "A strategic interaction whose joint payoff is not fixed: cooperative play can create value and destructive play can destroy it, so the size of the pie is endogenous to the strategy profile.", "page_ref": "prime:non_zero_sum_game", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Actors -> players; combined choices -> strategy profile; total value -> joint payoff.", "slug": "non_zero_sum_game", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires joint payoff to vary as a function of the strategy profile."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Actors choose strategies whose joint effect changes total value rather than merely transferring it.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires under-provision of a non-excludable shared good despite positive collective benefit.", "role_mapping": "Unrealized gain -> under-provided shared good; noncooperation -> free-riding incentive.", "slug": "free_riding", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b025_a07_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: There are plausible complementarities, gains from trade, risk-sharing opportunities, information-sharing gains, or coordination improvements that are not being realized. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["There are plausible complementarities, gains from trade, risk-sharing opportunities, information-sharing gains, or coordination improvements that are not being realized."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Free Riding", "one_liner": "The systematic under-provision that results when individuals can enjoy a non-excludable shared good without contributing proportionately to producing it.", "page_ref": "prime:free_riding", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Unrealized gain -> under-provided shared good; noncooperation -> free-riding incentive.", "slug": "free_riding", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires under-provision of a non-excludable shared good despite positive collective benefit."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Plausible cooperative surplus or shared-risk gains remain unrealized.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Dominant individual defection is privately rational yet selects a uniquely reached outcome Pareto-dominated by cooperation.", "role_mapping": "Private advantage -> dominant defection; lower total payoff -> collective failure.", "slug": "social_dilemma", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b025_a07_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Current incentives reward relative advantage, sabotage, rent seeking, or bargaining theater even when those strategies reduce total value. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Current incentives reward relative advantage, sabotage, rent seeking, or bargaining theater even when those strategies reduce total value."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Social Dilemma", "one_liner": "Individually rational defection yields a collectively worse outcome (canonical form: the Prisoner's Dilemma).", "page_ref": "prime:social_dilemma", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Private advantage -> dominant defection; lower total payoff -> collective failure.", "slug": "social_dilemma", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Dominant individual defection is privately rational yet selects a uniquely reached outcome Pareto-dominated by cooperation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Current incentives reward private advantage while selecting a lower total payoff.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "At least one actor fears that a value-creating move will expose them to exploitation, dependency, appropriation, retaliation, or unfair allocation.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Actors are locked into a strategic interaction where their choices jointly determine total value, but the interaction is framed, governed, or incentivized as if the payoff were fixed. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: At least one actor fears that a value-creating move will expose them to exploitation, dependency, appropriation, retaliation, or unfair allocation. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["At least one actor fears that a value-creating move will expose them to exploitation, dependency, appropriation, retaliation, or unfair allocation.", "Actors are locked into a strategic interaction where their choices jointly determine total value, but the interaction is framed, governed, or incentivized as if the payoff were fixed."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "At least one actor fears that a value-creating move will expose them to exploitation, dependency, appropriation, retaliation, or unfair allocation."}, {"display_text": "A nominally competitive or conflictual setting also contains room for cooperative surplus, shared risk reduction, common infrastructure, or mutually beneficial sequencing.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Parties must make the pie bigger while also deciding who can trust whom, who bears risk, who receives surplus, who can exit, and who protects outsiders from hidden losses. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: A nominally competitive or conflictual setting also contains room for cooperative surplus, shared risk reduction, common infrastructure, or mutually beneficial sequencing. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A nominally competitive or conflictual setting also contains room for cooperative surplus, shared risk reduction, common infrastructure, or mutually beneficial sequencing.", "Parties must make the pie bigger while also deciding who can trust whom, who bears risk, who receives surplus, who can exit, and who protects outsiders from hidden losses."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "A nominally competitive or conflictual setting also contains room for cooperative surplus, shared risk reduction, common infrastructure, or mutually beneficial sequencing."}, {"display_text": "Public-good, commons, platform, alliance, or ecosystem outcomes depend on the strategy profile rather than on isolated individual effort.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Public-good, commons, platform, alliance, or ecosystem outcomes depend on the strategy profile rather than on isolated individual effort. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Public-good, commons, platform, alliance, or ecosystem outcomes depend on the strategy profile rather than on isolated individual effort."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Public-good, commons, platform, alliance, or ecosystem outcomes depend on the strategy profile rather than on isolated individual effort."}, {"display_text": "Parties disagree about whether a proposed move creates value, transfers burden, or imposes hidden costs on outsiders.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Parties must make the pie bigger while also deciding who can trust whom, who bears risk, who receives surplus, who can exit, and who protects outsiders from hidden losses. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Parties disagree about whether a proposed move creates value, transfers burden, or imposes hidden costs on outsiders. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Parties disagree about whether a proposed move creates value, transfers burden, or imposes hidden costs on outsiders.", "Parties must make the pie bigger while also deciding who can trust whom, who bears risk, who receives surplus, who can exit, and who protects outsiders from hidden losses."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "Parties disagree about whether a proposed move creates value, transfers burden, or imposes hidden costs on outsiders."}, {"display_text": "A system needs to distinguish true zero-sum constraints from fixed-pie framing that is hiding variable-sum opportunities.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Actors are locked into a strategic interaction where their choices jointly determine total value, but the interaction is framed, governed, or incentivized as if the payoff were fixed. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: A system needs to distinguish true zero-sum constraints from fixed-pie framing that is hiding variable-sum opportunities. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A system needs to distinguish true zero-sum constraints from fixed-pie framing that is hiding variable-sum opportunities.", "Actors are locked into a strategic interaction where their choices jointly determine total value, but the interaction is framed, governed, or incentivized as if the payoff were fixed."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 8, "text": "A system needs to distinguish true zero-sum constraints from fixed-pie framing that is hiding variable-sum opportunities."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 25, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-025", "ledger_sha256": "76200b75a06e3248bfbf5261cecd9026514948c65649dc5ad83d7089e91d8f7d"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": [{"groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A purely calculating player can choose the safe equilibrium from probabilities without experiencing fear; that counterexample defeats a direct match but is excluded by the single experiential guard.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Assurance Game", "one_liner": "The stag-hunt game in which each player strictly prefers to cooperate if and only if the others do, producing two self-enforcing equilibria — a payoff-dominant cooperative one and a risk-dominant defection one — so the binding constraint is mutual confidence, not incentives.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:assurance_game", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1", "O3"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "confidence_shortfall_experienced_as_fear", "predicate": "The mutual-confidence shortfall is experienced by a player as fear of becoming dependent on others through the cooperative move.", "rationale": "The exact game supplies actors, cooperative value, same-actor downside, and dependence on others; the single experiential guard supplies only the actor-bound fear modality for the dependency branch."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "assurance_game"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "confidence_shortfall_experienced_as_fear"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "assurance_game", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P040-C03-U1", "why_it_fits": "With the guard, the assurance structure entails a value-creating cooperative move whose confidence shortfall is feared because it exposes the same actor to dependency on others' matching action."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A player could participate in the repeated game while feeling no fear at all; the contextual guard excludes exactly that counterexample and changes no game roles.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma", "one_liner": "The prisoner's-dilemma stage game (payoffs T > R > P > S) played over many observed rounds, where a high enough continuation probability lets the threat of future punishment deter present defection — turning the one-shot game's unavoidable mutual defection into sustainable cooperation.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:iterated_prisoners_dilemma", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1", "O3"], "guard_type": "QUANTIFIER_BINDING", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "player_fears_cooperative_sucker_payoff", "predicate": "At least one player fears that cooperating will expose that same player to the sucker payoff if the partner defects.", "rationale": "The exact repeated game supplies actors, value-creating cooperation, and same-actor sucker-payoff exploitation; one actor-bound fear fact supplies the only missing mental-state obligations."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "iterated_prisoners_dilemma"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "player_fears_cooperative_sucker_payoff"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "iterated_prisoners_dilemma", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P040-C03-U1", "why_it_fits": "Retain with one contextual qualifier: the exact game already supplies cooperative value and one-sided exploitation exposure, while one atomic fear attribution supplies the only missing branch obligations."}], "publication_role": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT_ONLY", "source_residual_occurrence_id": "r:endogenous_pie_payoff_design:b025_a07_c3", "unit": {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P040-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O9"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail one or more actors who hold the focal fear.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "At least one focal actor has the fear.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must type the feared action as potentially value-creating rather than purely destructive.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The contemplated action is a value-creating move.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve the fearing actor's prospective exposure from the value-creating move without requiring that actor to make or accept the move or that the feared harm actually occur.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The actor fears prospective exposure resulting from the value-creating move.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must direct the prospective exposure from the value-creating move to the fearing actor.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The feared consequence is that the move will expose the same actor to harm.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfying this branch must type the prospective harm as exploitation.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The feared harm is exploitation.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfying this branch must type the prospective harm as dependency.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The feared harm is dependency.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfying this branch must type the prospective harm as appropriation.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The feared harm is appropriation.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfying this branch must type the prospective harm as retaliation.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The feared harm is retaliation.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfying this branch must type the prospective harm as unfair allocation.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "The feared harm is unfair allocation.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "At least one actor fears that a value-creating move will expose that actor to one listed harm.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "At least one actor fears that a value-creating move will expose that actor to one listed harm.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P040-C03-U1"}}]}
{"archetype": {"name": "Endpoint Fan-Out Fulfillment", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:endpoint_fanout_fulfillment", "slug": "endpoint_fanout_fulfillment"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system reports strong aggregate throughput or central availability, yet its flow fans out at the terminal stage into many low-volume endpoints with different locations, constraints, timing, capabilities, and failure risks. Upstream unit cost falls through consolidation while endpoint cost, latency, exception load, and noncompletion remain high or increase as a share of the whole. Provider dashboards stop at dispatch, publication, eligibility, referral, or local handoff, so unresolved endpoint work and recipient burden are invisible.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system reports strong aggregate throughput or central availability, yet its flow fans out at the terminal stage into many low-volume endpoints with different locations, constraints, timing, capabilities, and failure risks. Upstream unit cost falls through consolidation while endpoint cost, latency, exception load, and noncompletion remain high or increase as a share of the whole. Provider dashboards stop at dispatch, publication, eligibility, referral, or local handoff, so unresolved endpoint work and recipient burden are invisible."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires few trunks carrying much with falling upstream per-unit cost.", "role_mapping": "High-volume trunk -> few-carrying-much topology.", "slug": "last_mile_failure", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The exact record requires a consolidated channel with volume economies and standardization.", "role_mapping": "Efficient hub -> consolidated trunk.", "slug": "last_mile_delivery", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b025_a08_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A high-volume trunk, platform, hub, central service, or shared medium carries most upstream flow efficiently. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A high-volume trunk, platform, hub, central service, or shared medium carries most upstream flow efficiently."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Last-Mile Failure", "one_liner": "A distribution network's per-unit cost, latency, and failure rate spike at the final stage where its geometry fans out from few-trunks-carrying-much to many-leaves-each-carrying-little, so upstream throughput overstates endpoint coverage.", "page_ref": "prime:last_mile_failure", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "High-volume trunk -> few-carrying-much topology.", "slug": "last_mile_failure", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires few trunks carrying much with falling upstream per-unit cost."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Last Mile Delivery", "one_liner": "The final segment from a consolidated trunk to heterogeneous individual endpoints costs disproportionately, and its share of total cost grows as upstream efficiency improves.", "page_ref": "prime:last_mile_delivery", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Efficient hub -> consolidated trunk.", "slug": "last_mile_delivery", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires a consolidated channel with volume economies and standardization."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A high-volume consolidated trunk carries upstream flow efficiently.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The defining geometry fans from few high-volume trunks to many individually small heterogeneous leaves.", "role_mapping": "Terminal branches -> fan-out; endpoints -> heterogeneous leaves.", "slug": "last_mile_failure", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime requires heterogeneous individual destinations whose differences defeat consolidation.", "role_mapping": "Low-volume endpoints -> individual destinations; heterogeneity -> endpoint differences.", "slug": "last_mile_delivery", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b025_a08_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The terminal stage branches into many low-volume or heterogeneous endpoints. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The terminal stage branches into many low-volume or heterogeneous endpoints."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Last-Mile Failure", "one_liner": "A distribution network's per-unit cost, latency, and failure rate spike at the final stage where its geometry fans out from few-trunks-carrying-much to many-leaves-each-carrying-little, so upstream throughput overstates endpoint coverage.", "page_ref": "prime:last_mile_failure", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Terminal branches -> fan-out; endpoints -> heterogeneous leaves.", "slug": "last_mile_failure", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The defining geometry fans from few high-volume trunks to many individually small heterogeneous leaves."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Last Mile Delivery", "one_liner": "The final segment from a consolidated trunk to heterogeneous individual endpoints costs disproportionately, and its share of total cost grows as upstream efficiency improves.", "page_ref": "prime:last_mile_delivery", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Low-volume endpoints -> individual destinations; heterogeneity -> endpoint differences.", "slug": "last_mile_delivery", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires heterogeneous individual destinations whose differences defeat consolidation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The terminal stage branches into many low-volume heterogeneous endpoints.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Per-endpoint interface adaptation is mandatory and includes access, schedule, language, infrastructure, and behavior differences.", "role_mapping": "Local completion work -> endpoint bridging.", "slug": "last_mile_delivery", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The exact record requires endpoint diversity to defeat standardization and create per-leaf fixed work.", "role_mapping": "Local adaptation -> heterogeneous endpoint service.", "slug": "last_mile_failure", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b025_a08_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Endpoint completion requires local travel, access, identity, timing, adaptation, custody, assistance, or verification. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Endpoint completion requires local travel, access, identity, timing, adaptation, custody, assistance, or verification."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Last Mile Delivery", "one_liner": "The final segment from a consolidated trunk to heterogeneous individual endpoints costs disproportionately, and its share of total cost grows as upstream efficiency improves.", "page_ref": "prime:last_mile_delivery", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Local completion work -> endpoint bridging.", "slug": "last_mile_delivery", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Per-endpoint interface adaptation is mandatory and includes access, schedule, language, infrastructure, and behavior differences."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Last-Mile Failure", "one_liner": "A distribution network's per-unit cost, latency, and failure rate spike at the final stage where its geometry fans out from few-trunks-carrying-much to many-leaves-each-carrying-little, so upstream throughput overstates endpoint coverage.", "page_ref": "prime:last_mile_failure", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Local adaptation -> heterogeneous endpoint service.", "slug": "last_mile_failure", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires endpoint diversity to defeat standardization and create per-leaf fixed work."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Endpoint completion requires local access, timing, adaptation, custody, assistance, or verification.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Throughput-coverage dissociation is mandatory: upstream volume overstates endpoints reached in time and usable form.", "role_mapping": "Upstream throughput -> trunk metric; completion -> endpoint coverage.", "slug": "last_mile_failure", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b025_a08_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Upstream throughput is materially higher than verified endpoint completion. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Upstream throughput is materially higher than verified endpoint completion."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Last-Mile Failure", "one_liner": "A distribution network's per-unit cost, latency, and failure rate spike at the final stage where its geometry fans out from few-trunks-carrying-much to many-leaves-each-carrying-little, so upstream throughput overstates endpoint coverage.", "page_ref": "prime:last_mile_failure", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Upstream throughput -> trunk metric; completion -> endpoint coverage.", "slug": "last_mile_failure", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Throughput-coverage dissociation is mandatory: upstream volume overstates endpoints reached in time and usable form."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Upstream throughput materially exceeds verified endpoint completion.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Sparse tails, failed attempts, or local exceptions contribute disproportionate cost and delay.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Upstream unit cost falls through consolidation while endpoint cost, latency, exception load, and noncompletion remain high or increase as a share of the whole. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Sparse tails, failed attempts, or local exceptions contribute disproportionate cost and delay. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Sparse tails, failed attempts, or local exceptions contribute disproportionate cost and delay.", "Upstream unit cost falls through consolidation while endpoint cost, latency, exception load, and noncompletion remain high or increase as a share of the whole."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Sparse tails, failed attempts, or local exceptions contribute disproportionate cost and delay."}, {"display_text": "The provider can alter staging, modes, routing, local capacity, handoffs, incentives, cost allocation, or recovery.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Provider dashboards stop at dispatch, publication, eligibility, referral, or local handoff, so unresolved endpoint work and recipient burden are invisible. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: The provider can alter staging, modes, routing, local capacity, handoffs, incentives, cost allocation, or recovery. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The provider can alter staging, modes, routing, local capacity, handoffs, incentives, cost allocation, or recovery.", "Provider dashboards stop at dispatch, publication, eligibility, referral, or local handoff, so unresolved endpoint work and recipient burden are invisible."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The provider can alter staging, modes, routing, local capacity, handoffs, incentives, cost allocation, or recovery."}, {"display_text": "Coverage, equity, safety, privacy, or essential-service obligations constrain pure cost minimization.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Exploit consolidation and standardization upstream while providing enough local variation, proximity, assistance, and recovery downstream to complete service for heterogeneous endpoints without losing economies of scale, accountability, or equitable coverage. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: Coverage, equity, safety, privacy, or essential-service obligations constrain pure cost minimization. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Coverage, equity, safety, privacy, or essential-service obligations constrain pure cost minimization.", "Exploit consolidation and standardization upstream while providing enough local variation, proximity, assistance, and recovery downstream to complete service for heterogeneous endpoints without losing economies of scale, accountability, or equitable coverage."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "Coverage, equity, safety, privacy, or essential-service obligations constrain pure cost minimization."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 25, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-025", "ledger_sha256": "76200b75a06e3248bfbf5261cecd9026514948c65649dc5ad83d7089e91d8f7d"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Enforceable Obligation Architecture", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:enforceable_obligation_architecture", "slug": "enforceable_obligation_architecture"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 2 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 2}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A relationship requires reliable future performance, restraint, exchange, or coordination, but the parties face uncertainty, asymmetric incentives, possible opportunism, memory limits, changing context, or interpretive conflict. Without a contract-like structure, expectations remain informal, breach is contested, remedies are improvised, and reliance becomes risky or impossible.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A relationship requires reliable future performance, restraint, exchange, or coordination, but the parties face uncertainty, asymmetric incentives, possible opportunism, memory limits, changing context, or interpretive conflict. Without a contract-like structure, expectations remain informal, breach is contested, remedies are improvised, and reliance becomes risky or impossible."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires two or more binding-capable parties and a bundled set of what each must, may, and may not do.", "role_mapping": "Parties -> counterparties; specified performance -> bundled obligations.", "slug": "contract", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b025_a09_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Multiple parties must coordinate over time and each party needs confidence that the others will perform, refrain, pay, disclose, maintain, or accept specified consequences. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Multiple parties must coordinate over time and each party needs confidence that the others will perform, refrain, pay, disclose, maintain, or accept specified consequences."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Contract", "one_liner": "A multi-party bundle of obligations, breach criteria, and remedies under an accepted enforcement regime.", "page_ref": "prime:contract", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Parties -> counterparties; specified performance -> bundled obligations.", "slug": "contract", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires two or more binding-capable parties and a bundled set of what each must, may, and may not do."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Multiple parties coordinate over time around specified performance, restraint, payment, disclosure, maintenance, or consequences.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P040-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O9"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must connect the selected stake to the relationship rather than treat it as unrelated background.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A focal relationship creates the selected stake.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail unsafe implicitness, not merely a preference for additional documentation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The selected stake cannot safely remain implicit.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfying this branch must type the relationship-created stake as reliance.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The selected stake is reliance.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfying this branch must type the relationship-created stake as sunk cost.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The selected stake is sunk cost.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfying this branch must type the relationship-created stake as specialized investment.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The selected stake is specialized investment.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfying this branch must type the relationship-created stake as delegated authority.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The selected stake is delegated authority.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfying this branch must type the relationship-created stake as shared risk.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The selected stake is shared risk.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfying this branch must type the relationship-created stake as access rights.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The selected stake is access rights.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfying this branch must type the relationship-created stake as an obligation.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "The selected stake is an obligation.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A relationship creates one listed stake that cannot safely remain implicit.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A relationship creates one listed stake that cannot safely remain implicit.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P040-C05-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A contract can govern a routine low-reliance exchange whose terms could safely have remained informal.", "slug": "contract"}], "residual_id": "r:enforceable_obligation_architecture:b025_a09_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b025_a09_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The relationship creates reliance, sunk costs, specialized investment, delegated authority, shared risk, access rights, or obligations that cannot be safely left implicit. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The relationship creates reliance, sunk costs, specialized investment, delegated authority, shared risk, access rights, or obligations that cannot be safely left implicit."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "If the investment were redeployable or all relevant terms safely governed, the counterparty would lack the post-commitment leverage and the case would cease to be a hold-up problem.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Hold-up Problem", "one_liner": "Explain why parties who would both gain from a relationship-specific asset fail to build it: once the investment is sunk the counterparty can renegotiate against the exposed investor, and it is the anticipation of that squeeze — not the squeeze itself — that quietly distorts investment beforehand.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:hold_up_problem", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "hold_up_problem"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "hold_up_problem", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P040-C05-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every hold-up problem contains a relationship-created specialized and sunk investment whose unsafe ungoverned contractual margin exposes the investor to ex-post extraction."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Reliance, sunk cost, specialized investment, authority, risk, access, or obligation cannot safely remain implicit.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Nonperformance, misuse, delay, defective delivery, information withholding, or opportunistic reinterpretation would be costly enough to require predefined breach criteria and remedies.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Without a contract-like structure, expectations remain informal, breach is contested, remedies are improvised, and reliance becomes risky or impossible. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Nonperformance, misuse, delay, defective delivery, information withholding, or opportunistic reinterpretation would be costly enough to require predefined breach criteria and remedies. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Nonperformance, misuse, delay, defective delivery, information withholding, or opportunistic reinterpretation would be costly enough to require predefined breach criteria and remedies.", "Without a contract-like structure, expectations remain informal, breach is contested, remedies are improvised, and reliance becomes risky or impossible."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Nonperformance, misuse, delay, defective delivery, information withholding, or opportunistic reinterpretation would be costly enough to require predefined breach criteria and remedies."}, {"display_text": "The parties can recognize or construct an enforcement regime: legal, organizational, technical, reputational, community-based, or contractual-administrative.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: The parties can recognize or construct an enforcement regime: legal, organizational, technical, reputational, community-based, or contractual-administrative. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The parties can recognize or construct an enforcement regime: legal, organizational, technical, reputational, community-based, or contractual-administrative."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The parties can recognize or construct an enforcement regime: legal, organizational, technical, reputational, community-based, or contractual-administrative."}, {"display_text": "The arrangement needs to distinguish performance failure from changed circumstances, force majeure, waiver, exception, misunderstanding, and out-of-scope demand.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Commitment must be strong enough to support reliance and deter opportunism, but flexible and legitimate enough to handle ambiguity, changed circumstances, incomplete specification, and proportional remedies. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: The arrangement needs to distinguish performance failure from changed circumstances, force majeure, waiver, exception, misunderstanding, and out-of-scope demand. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The arrangement needs to distinguish performance failure from changed circumstances, force majeure, waiver, exception, misunderstanding, and out-of-scope demand.", "Commitment must be strong enough to support reliance and deter opportunism, but flexible and legitimate enough to handle ambiguity, changed circumstances, incomplete specification, and proportional remedies."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The arrangement needs to distinguish performance failure from changed circumstances, force majeure, waiver, exception, misunderstanding, and out-of-scope demand."}, {"display_text": "Future disputes must be routed through a legitimate process rather than unilateral retaliation or relationship collapse.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A relationship requires reliable future performance, restraint, exchange, or coordination, but the parties face uncertainty, asymmetric incentives, possible opportunism, memory limits, changing context, or interpretive conflict. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: Future disputes must be routed through a legitimate process rather than unilateral retaliation or relationship collapse. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Future disputes must be routed through a legitimate process rather than unilateral retaliation or relationship collapse.", "A relationship requires reliable future performance, restraint, exchange, or coordination, but the parties face uncertainty, asymmetric incentives, possible opportunism, memory limits, changing context, or interpretive conflict."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Future disputes must be routed through a legitimate process rather than unilateral retaliation or relationship collapse."}, {"display_text": "The parties need a stage-gate, amendment, renewal, or exit structure because commitment must bind without becoming impossibly rigid.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: The parties need a stage-gate, amendment, renewal, or exit structure because commitment must bind without becoming impossibly rigid. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The parties need a stage-gate, amendment, renewal, or exit structure because commitment must bind without becoming impossibly rigid."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "The parties need a stage-gate, amendment, renewal, or exit structure because commitment must bind without becoming impossibly rigid."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 25, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-025", "ledger_sha256": "76200b75a06e3248bfbf5261cecd9026514948c65649dc5ad83d7089e91d8f7d"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Ensemble and Population-Level Equilibrium versus Individual-Level Heterogeneity", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:ensemble_and_population_level_equilibrium_versus_individual_level_heterogeneity", "slug": "ensemble_and_population_level_equilibrium_versus_individual_level_heterogeneity"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a level-of-analysis error. Macro equilibrium compresses information. That compression is useful because it lets a large system be described compactly, but it also hides tails, subgroups, spatial patches, local overload, and individual trajectories.\n\nWhen decision makers treat the compressed macro claim as if it describes every member, they miss hidden risk and inequity. When they treat every individual exception as if it disproves the macro pattern, they lose the value of ensemble-level reasoning. The archetype solves neither by slogan; it creates a disciplined crosswalk between aggregate state and member distribution.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system is described as being in equilibrium, steady state, market balance, average success, or aggregate stability, while individual units, subgroups, local patches, routes, agents, or trajectories vary substantially. Decision makers then overinterpret the macro claim as if it applies uniformly to each member, or overreact to individual variation as if it disproves the macro pattern."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P040-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"], ["O1", "O3"], ["O1", "O4"], ["O1", "O5"], ["O1", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must make the descriptor action-guiding rather than merely descriptive or exploratory.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A focal descriptor is currently used to guide action.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfying this branch must type the descriptor as a mean.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The action-guiding descriptor is a mean.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfying this branch must type the descriptor as an equilibrium.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The action-guiding descriptor is an equilibrium.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfying this branch must type the descriptor as a steady state.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The action-guiding descriptor is a steady state.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfying this branch must type the descriptor as a market-clearing state or metric.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The action-guiding descriptor is market clearing.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfying this branch must type the descriptor as population-level.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The action-guiding descriptor is a population-level metric.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "One listed aggregate or equilibrium descriptor is being used to guide action.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "One listed aggregate or equilibrium descriptor guides action.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P040-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An ensemble can be exploratory and need not supply a mean or equilibrium used for action.", "slug": "ensemble"}], "residual_id": "r:ensemble_and_population_level_equilibrium_versus_individual_level_heterogeneity:b025_a10_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b025_a10_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A mean, equilibrium, steady-state, market-clearing, or population-level metric is being used to guide action. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A mean, equilibrium, steady-state, market-clearing, or population-level metric is being used to guide action."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An ensemble can be exploratory and need not supply a mean or equilibrium used for action.", "slug": "ensemble"}], "normalized_requirement": "A mean, equilibrium, steady-state, or population metric guides action.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A mean, equilibrium, steady-state, or population metric guides action.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires structurally heterogeneous per-unit effects keyed to unit properties.", "role_mapping": "Members -> heterogeneous units; interpretation-relevant differences -> effect vector.", "slug": "distributional_effects", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "Meaningful variation across comparable members along uncertainty axes is mandatory.", "role_mapping": "Individual runs -> ensemble members; relevant differences -> uncertainty axes.", "slug": "ensemble", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b025_a10_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Individual members, subgroups, locations, trajectories, packets, organisms, households, or model runs differ in ways that may affect interpretation. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Individual members, subgroups, locations, trajectories, packets, organisms, households, or model runs differ in ways that may affect interpretation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Distributional Effects", "one_liner": "An aggregate outcome conceals systematically heterogeneous, unit-level changes.", "page_ref": "prime:distributional_effects", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Members -> heterogeneous units; interpretation-relevant differences -> effect vector.", "slug": "distributional_effects", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires structurally heterogeneous per-unit effects keyed to unit properties."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Ensemble", "one_liner": "Multiple comparable realizations are generated or assembled and analyzed together through a probability model and aggregation rule to characterize a distribution rather than a single trajectory.", "page_ref": "prime:ensemble", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Individual runs -> ensemble members; relevant differences -> uncertainty axes.", "slug": "ensemble", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Meaningful variation across comparable members along uncertainty axes is mandatory."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Individual members, subgroups, locations, or trajectories differ in interpretation-relevant ways.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P040-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O9"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve the same system across the scale comparison.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "One focal system is evaluated at both scales.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must distinguish the scale of stability from the scale of the selected second property.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "At least two distinct scales are involved.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve the can-be modality and need not require that the states are currently observed.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The source asserts possible coexistence rather than necessary or actual coexistence.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve stability at the first selected scale.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The system is stable at one scale.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve the cross-scale coexistence relation rather than unrelated observations at different times.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "A selected second-scale property coexists with and contrasts against the first-scale stability.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfying this branch must preserve second-scale volatility.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The system is volatile at the second scale.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfying this branch must preserve second-scale inequality.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The system is unequal at the second scale.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfying this branch must preserve second-scale overload.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The system is overloaded at the second scale.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfying this branch must preserve second-scale adaptivity.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "The system is adaptive at the second scale.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "The same system can be stable at one scale while having one listed contrasting property at another scale.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A system may be stable at one scale while having one listed property at another scale.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P040-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Thermodynamic equilibrium removes net flows and does not require volatile or unequal micro units at a second operational scale.", "slug": "thermodynamic_equilibrium"}], "residual_id": "r:ensemble_and_population_level_equilibrium_versus_individual_level_heterogeneity:b025_a10_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b025_a10_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The system can be stable at one scale while volatile, unequal, overloaded, or adaptive at another scale. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The system can be stable at one scale while volatile, unequal, overloaded, or adaptive at another scale."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A merely rigid return to baseline might be called non-adaptive, but the exact record requires a perturbation-contingent compensating response; the general bridge classifies that response without adding a new event.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_BRIDGE", "name": "Lehman's law of self regulation", "one_liner": "Treat a long-lived software project as a closed feedback loop that self-regulates around an operating point, so single-node pushes are absorbed and only structural changes to the loop durably relocate its release-size, cadence, and defect-density distributions.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:lehmans_law_of_self_regulation", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O9"], "guard_type": "TYPE_SUBSUMPTION", "kind": "INTERPRETIVE_BRIDGE", "normalized_key": "compensating_feedback_is_adaptive_behavior", "predicate": "A compensating feedback response that adjusts to a perturbation is adaptive behavior at the responding scale.", "rationale": "The exact record fixes whole-loop stability and a perturbation-contingent compensating response at another scale; classifying such adjustment as adaptive behavior is a general bridge."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "lehmans_law_of_self_regulation"}, {"kind": "INTERPRETIVE_BRIDGE", "value": "compensating_feedback_is_adaptive_behavior"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "lehmans_law_of_self_regulation", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P040-C07-U1", "why_it_fits": "Retain through one general type bridge: all cross-scale structure is exact, and only the ordinary classification of compensating feedback as adaptive behavior is supplied."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The system is stable at one scale while volatile, unequal, overloaded, or adaptive at another.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Summary non-informativeness is mandatory: a scalar aggregate conceals the structured effect vector.", "role_mapping": "Dashboard scalar -> aggregation rule; wider distribution -> unit effect vector.", "slug": "distributional_effects", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b025_a10_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A representative individual, average case, or single dashboard metric is being used to stand in for a wider distribution. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A representative individual, average case, or single dashboard metric is being used to stand in for a wider distribution."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Distributional Effects", "one_liner": "An aggregate outcome conceals systematically heterogeneous, unit-level changes.", "page_ref": "prime:distributional_effects", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Dashboard scalar -> aggregation rule; wider distribution -> unit effect vector.", "slug": "distributional_effects", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Summary non-informativeness is mandatory: a scalar aggregate conceals the structured effect vector."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A representative case or one dashboard metric stands in for a wider distribution.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P040-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O3", "O4", "O6"], ["O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate using an organization branch must type the focal actor as an organization.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The focal aggregate-measuring actor is an organization.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate using a model branch must type the focal actor as a model.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The focal aggregate-measuring actor is a model.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must require preexisting aggregate measurement capacity, not a proposal to create it.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The focal organization or model already has aggregate measurement capacity.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve the positive-capacity versus absent-capability contrast in one organization or model.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Aggregate measurement capacity coexists in the same focal actor with the selected missing capability.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfying this branch must entail absence of distributional accountability.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The missing capability is distributional accountability.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfying this branch must entail absence of micro-macro translation rules.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The missing capability is a micro-macro translation rule.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "An organization or model already measures aggregates while lacking distributional accountability or micro-macro translation rules.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An aggregate-measuring organization or model lacks one listed distributional capability.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P040-C08-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A distributional-effects analysis can coexist with mature accountability and explicit micro-macro translation.", "slug": "distributional_effects"}], "residual_id": "r:ensemble_and_population_level_equilibrium_versus_individual_level_heterogeneity:b025_a10_c7", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b025_a10_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The organization or model already has aggregate measurement capacity but lacks distributional accountability or micro/macro translation rules. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The organization or model already has aggregate measurement capacity but lacks distributional accountability or micro/macro translation rules."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A distributional-effects analysis can coexist with mature accountability and explicit micro-macro translation.", "slug": "distributional_effects"}], "normalized_requirement": "Aggregate measurement exists but distributional accountability or micro-macro translation rules do not.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Aggregate measurement exists but distributional accountability or micro-macro translation rules do not.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The cost of ignoring tails, local patches, subgroup differences, or microstate variation is materially significant.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "That compression is useful because it lets a large system be described compactly, but it also hides tails, subgroups, spatial patches, local overload, and individual trajectories. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The cost of ignoring tails, local patches, subgroup differences, or microstate variation is materially significant. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The cost of ignoring tails, local patches, subgroup differences, or microstate variation is materially significant.", "That compression is useful because it lets a large system be described compactly, but it also hides tails, subgroups, spatial patches, local overload, and individual trajectories."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The cost of ignoring tails, local patches, subgroup differences, or microstate variation is materially significant."}, {"display_text": "The practical intervention may need to target subgroups, local conditions, or individual trajectories even though the headline metric is aggregate.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when an aggregate metric, equilibrium statement, steady-state model, or population-level conclusion is shaping decisions, but individual members, subgroups, local patches, or trajectories may differ in meaningful ways. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: The practical intervention may need to target subgroups, local conditions, or individual trajectories even though the headline metric is aggregate. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The practical intervention may need to target subgroups, local conditions, or individual trajectories even though the headline metric is aggregate.", "Use this archetype when an aggregate metric, equilibrium statement, steady-state model, or population-level conclusion is shaping decisions, but individual members, subgroups, local patches, or trajectories may differ in meaningful ways."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The practical intervention may need to target subgroups, local conditions, or individual trajectories even though the headline metric is aggregate."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 25, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-025", "ledger_sha256": "76200b75a06e3248bfbf5261cecd9026514948c65649dc5ad83d7089e91d8f7d"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Ensemble Decision Aggregation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:ensemble_decision_aggregation", "slug": "ensemble_decision_aggregation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 3 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is single-source fragility under uncertainty. A decision maker may need one action, but the evidence is distributed across sources with different blind spots. One model may overfit historical data. One expert may see only their specialty. One simulation may encode an incomplete assumption set. One data stream may be timely but noisy. One committee may converge socially before the evidence deserves convergence.\n\nWithout a structured aggregation process, organizations often oscillate between two weak moves: trusting one source too much or informally blending sources without knowing what was preserved or erased. Both moves can hide the very uncertainty that should guide action.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A decision depends on uncertain prediction or judgment, and a single source may be biased, overfit, or incomplete."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires meaningful member variation spanning uncertainty sources and warns that averaging is a hedge against misspecification.", "role_mapping": "Single source -> member; possible incompleteness -> uncertainty axis.", "slug": "ensemble", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b025_a11_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Any one model, expert, simulation, data stream, instrument, or perspective could be biased, overfit, incomplete, stale, or strategically distorted. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Any one model, expert, simulation, data stream, instrument, or perspective could be biased, overfit, incomplete, stale, or strategically distorted."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Ensemble", "one_liner": "Multiple comparable realizations are generated or assembled and analyzed together through a probability model and aggregation rule to characterize a distribution rather than a single trajectory.", "page_ref": "prime:ensemble", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Single source -> member; possible incompleteness -> uncertainty axis.", "slug": "ensemble", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires meaningful member variation spanning uncertainty sources and warns that averaging is a hedge against misspecification."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Any one model, expert, simulation, instrument, or perspective may be biased, overfit, incomplete, stale, or distorted.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P040-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail more than one decision input.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Several focal decision inputs exist.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must type the plural inputs as decision methods or information sources rather than unrelated options.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The inputs are methods, sources, or a mixed set of those types.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve plausibility rather than include options already known to be invalid.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Each focal input is plausible.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must apply the insufficiency of singular authority to every focal input.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "No single input is clearly authoritative enough to govern alone.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}], "predicate": "Several plausible methods or sources exist, but none is clearly authoritative enough to govern alone.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Several plausible decision inputs exist, but no one input is clearly authoritative enough to govern alone.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P040-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An ensemble may contain one authoritative baseline plus nonauthoritative perturbation runs.", "slug": "ensemble"}], "residual_id": "r:ensemble_decision_aggregation:b025_a11_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b025_a11_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Several plausible methods or sources exist, but none is clearly authoritative enough to govern alone. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Several plausible methods or sources exist, but none is clearly authoritative enough to govern alone."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An ensemble may contain one authoritative baseline plus nonauthoritative perturbation runs.", "slug": "ensemble"}], "normalized_requirement": "Several plausible sources exist but none is authoritative enough to govern alone.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Several plausible sources exist but none is authoritative enough to govern alone.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Ensemble members may differ only slightly and agree on every material decision.", "slug": "ensemble"}], "residual_id": "r:ensemble_decision_aggregation:b025_a11_c4", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b025_a11_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Different sources disagree in ways that are meaningful for risk, timing, resource allocation, or escalation. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Different sources disagree in ways that are meaningful for risk, timing, resource allocation, or escalation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Ensemble members may differ only slightly and agree on every material decision.", "slug": "ensemble"}], "normalized_requirement": "Sources disagree in ways material to risk, timing, resources, or escalation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Sources disagree in ways material to risk, timing, resources, or escalation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A forecast, classification, diagnosis, ranking, or decision depends on uncertain prediction or judgment.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A decision depends on uncertain prediction or judgment, and a single source may be biased, overfit, or incomplete. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: A forecast, classification, diagnosis, ranking, or decision depends on uncertain prediction or judgment. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A forecast, classification, diagnosis, ranking, or decision depends on uncertain prediction or judgment.", "A decision depends on uncertain prediction or judgment, and a single source may be biased, overfit, or incomplete."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "A forecast, classification, diagnosis, ranking, or decision depends on uncertain prediction or judgment."}, {"display_text": "The cost of single-source error is high enough to justify maintaining multiple estimates or review channels.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The archetype is especially helpful when the cost of relying on one source is high and when disagreement should change the decision rather than be hidden. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The cost of single-source error is high enough to justify maintaining multiple estimates or review channels. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The cost of single-source error is high enough to justify maintaining multiple estimates or review channels.", "The archetype is especially helpful when the cost of relying on one source is high and when disagreement should change the decision rather than be hidden."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The cost of single-source error is high enough to justify maintaining multiple estimates or review channels."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 25, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-025", "ledger_sha256": "76200b75a06e3248bfbf5261cecd9026514948c65649dc5ad83d7089e91d8f7d"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Entity Individuation Criteria Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:entity_individuation_criteria_design", "slug": "entity_individuation_criteria_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 3, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 3 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 1 of 3 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system needs to count, track, govern, compare, merge, split, assign responsibility to, or reason about entities, but its criteria for what makes something one entity are implicit, inconsistent, too domain-local, or reduced to whatever identifier, label, record, or category happens to be available.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system needs to count, track, govern, compare, merge, split, assign responsibility to, or reason about entities, but its criteria for what makes something one entity are implicit, inconsistent, too domain-local, or reduced to whatever identifier, label, record, or category happens to be available."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P040-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must contain multiple stakeholders, not one actor's uncertainty.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "At least two stakeholders evaluate the focal thing.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve one common object whose entity status is being judged.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The stakeholders evaluate the entity individuation of the same focal thing.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail conflicting stakeholder judgments rather than shared uncertainty.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The stakeholders disagree about that individuation.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve the one-versus-many contrast as the content of disagreement.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The opposed judgments classify the focal thing as one entity versus multiple entities.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Different stakeholders disagree about whether a focal thing is one entity or multiple entities.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Stakeholders disagree whether a focal thing is one entity or multiple entities.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P040-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A system can fix and unanimously apply one criteria set with no stakeholder disagreement.", "slug": "criteria_of_individuation"}], "residual_id": "r:entity_individuation_criteria_design:b025_a12_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b025_a12_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Examples include persons versus accounts, organisms versus colonies, works versus editions, organizations versus subsidiaries, cases versus events, or services versus components. In this condition set, the requirement is: Stakeholders disagree whether something is one entity or many.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Different stakeholders disagree about whether something is one entity or many."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A system can fix and unanimously apply one criteria set with no stakeholder disagreement.", "slug": "criteria_of_individuation"}], "normalized_requirement": "Stakeholders disagree whether something is one entity or many.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Stakeholders disagree whether something is one entity or many.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P040-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must contain a pair of presentations whose identity relation is at issue.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Two focal presentations are under comparison.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve possible co-reference without requiring that sameness is already known.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The presentations may refer to the same entity.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail absence of a principled test rather than a test that is merely costly or uncertain.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The focal system has no principled identity test for the pair.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must apply the missing-test state to the same possibly co-referential pair.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Possible sameness coexists with the system's inability to test that sameness on principle.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Two presentations may be co-referential, but the system lacks a principled identity test for them.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Two possibly co-referential presentations lack a principled identity test.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P040-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An identity-test instance necessarily has an operational sameness criterion, the opposite of this missing-test state.", "slug": "identity_test"}], "residual_id": "r:entity_individuation_criteria_design:b025_a12_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b025_a12_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Record linkage, legal evidence, authentication, provenance, and cross-system reconciliation all depend on this test. In this condition set, the requirement is: Two presentations may be co-referential but no principled identity test exists.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Two presentations might be the same entity, but the system lacks a principled identity test."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Corporate law can stipulate legal continuity and thereby supply a principled local test; the unselected-criterion guard excludes that counterexample without changing the Ship's criterion-relative structure.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Ship of Theseus", "one_liner": "Expose that 'is it still the same thing?' has no brute answer once total component replacement pulls substrate-continuity apart from pattern-continuity — the verdict is relative to which identity criterion you have decided counts.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:ship_of_theseus", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O3"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "identity_criterion_unselected", "predicate": "The focal system has not selected any member of the candidate's identity-criterion menu for the compared pair.", "rationale": "The unselected-criterion guard is one candidate-anchored governance state; together with the exact criterion-relative puzzle it entails the missing principled-test condition for the same pair."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "ship_of_theseus"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "identity_criterion_unselected"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "ship_of_theseus", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P040-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "In the guarded pre-selection state, the exact record entails two possibly same-entity presentations and a principled inability to decide their identity until a criterion is chosen."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Two presentations may be co-referential but no principled identity test exists.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P040-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must concern entity identity rather than mere record lookup or naming.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The identity of a focal entity is at issue.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve the mistaken constitutive or sufficiency relation, not merely use the artifact as evidence.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The selected artifact is treated as if it is itself sufficient to settle that identity.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfying this branch must type the identity-settling artifact as an identifier.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The selected artifact is an identifier.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfying this branch must type the identity-settling artifact as a category.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The selected artifact is a category.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfying this branch must type the identity-settling artifact as a record.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The selected artifact is a record.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfying this branch must type the identity-settling artifact as a registry.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The selected artifact is a registry.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "One listed representational artifact is treated as if it itself settled entity identity.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "One listed representational artifact is treated as sufficient to settle entity identity.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P040-C13-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact record requires an explicit scope of identity and treats the token as a resolver, not as the criterion that constitutes the entity.", "slug": "persistent_identifier"}], "residual_id": "r:entity_individuation_criteria_design:b025_a12_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b025_a12_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Identifiers and records can implement individuation decisions, but they cannot safely replace the criteria that justify them. In this condition set, the requirement is: Identifiers, categories, or registries are treated as if they settle entity identity.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Identifiers, categories, records, or registries are being treated as if they themselves settled entity identity."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact record requires an explicit scope of identity and treats the token as a resolver, not as the criterion that constitutes the entity.", "slug": "persistent_identifier"}], "normalized_requirement": "Identifiers, categories, or registries are treated as if they settle entity identity.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Identifiers, categories, or registries are treated as if they settle entity identity.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "DISJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A collection of parts may or may not compose a single whole.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The unity issue appears in assemblies, households, teams, biological individuals, modular systems, legal estates, and content works. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: A collection of parts may or may not compose a single whole. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A collection of parts may or may not compose a single whole.", "The unity issue appears in assemblies, households, teams, biological individuals, modular systems, legal estates, and content works."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "A collection of parts may or may not compose a single whole."}, {"display_text": "Entities change over time and the system must decide what changes preserve identity.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Growth, repair, migration, translation, ownership transfer, versioning, merger, division, succession, replacement, or role change can all challenge persistence. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Entities change over time and the system must decide what changes preserve identity. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Entities change over time and the system must decide what changes preserve identity.", "Growth, repair, migration, translation, ownership transfer, versioning, merger, division, succession, replacement, or role change can all challenge persistence."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Entities change over time and the system must decide what changes preserve identity."}, {"display_text": "Counts, rights, responsibilities, denominators, eligibility, or risk exposure depend on the entity boundary.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The archetype is most important when the identity decision has downstream consequences rather than merely descriptive interest. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Counts, rights, responsibilities, denominators, eligibility, or risk exposure depend on the entity boundary. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Counts, rights, responsibilities, denominators, eligibility, or risk exposure depend on the entity boundary.", "The archetype is most important when the identity decision has downstream consequences rather than merely descriptive interest."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Counts, rights, responsibilities, denominators, eligibility, or risk exposure depend on the entity boundary."}, {"display_text": "Multiple systems with different identity assumptions must interoperate.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Crosswalks fail when systems appear to share terms but individuate entities differently. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Multiple systems with different identity assumptions must interoperate. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Multiple systems with different identity assumptions must interoperate.", "Crosswalks fail when systems appear to share terms but individuate entities differently."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "Multiple systems with different identity assumptions must interoperate."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 25, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-025", "ledger_sha256": "76200b75a06e3248bfbf5261cecd9026514948c65649dc5ad83d7089e91d8f7d"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Entity Persistence Across Observation Gaps", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:entity_persistence_across_observation_gaps", "slug": "entity_persistence_across_observation_gaps"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 2 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 2}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system observes entities intermittently. Occlusion, sensor dropout, delayed reporting, disconnection, temporary disengagement, or sparse sampling makes an entity disappear from the current view even though it may continue to exist. If the system equates non-observation with nonexistence, it destroys continuity, loses history, duplicates entities on return, or makes unsafe decisions from false absence. If it never retires anything, stale ghost entities, storage burden, false matches, and privacy violations accumulate.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system observes entities intermittently. Occlusion, sensor dropout, delayed reporting, disconnection, temporary disengagement, or sparse sampling makes an entity disappear from the current view even though it may continue to exist. If the system equates non-observation with nonexistence, it destroys continuity, loses history, duplicates entities on return, or makes unsafe decisions from false absence. If it never retires anything, stale ghost entities, storage burden, false matches, and privacy violations accumulate."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires alternating observable and unobservable intervals while the entity is modeled as continuing to exist.", "role_mapping": "Observation gap -> unobservable interval; persistent entity -> permanence commitment.", "slug": "object_permanence", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b025_a13_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Entities can persist longer than the observation channel remains continuously reliable. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Entities can persist longer than the observation channel remains continuously reliable."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Object Permanence", "one_liner": "A system maintains persistent internal state for entities it cannot currently observe, modeling them as continuing to exist and re-binding them on re-emergence.", "page_ref": "prime:object_permanence", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Observation gap -> unobservable interval; persistent entity -> permanence commitment.", "slug": "object_permanence", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires alternating observable and unobservable intervals while the entity is modeled as continuing to exist."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Entities can persist longer than observation remains continuously reliable.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P040-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve a temporary absence state in which the entity may continue to exist.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "One possible underlying state is temporary absence of a focal entity.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve genuine termination rather than another temporary observation gap.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A distinct possible underlying state is true termination of that entity.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail observational indistinguishability or confusability between temporary absence and termination.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The two underlying states produce observationally confusable evidence.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve the contrast between continuing existence and true termination for the same entity.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The confusable observations correspond to different persistence states of the same focal entity.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Temporary absence and true termination are observationally confusable.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Temporary absence is observationally confusable with true termination.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P040-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A permanence model may receive an explicit termination event and therefore distinguish absence from termination reliably.", "slug": "object_permanence"}], "residual_id": "r:entity_persistence_across_observation_gaps:b025_a13_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b025_a13_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Temporary absence and true termination are observationally confusable. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Temporary absence and true termination are observationally confusable."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A permanence model may receive an explicit termination event and therefore distinguish absence from termination reliably.", "slug": "object_permanence"}], "normalized_requirement": "Temporary absence and true termination are observationally confusable.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Temporary absence and true termination are observationally confusable.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Later presentations must inherit history, permissions, obligations, predictions, or provenance from an earlier presentation when they are the same entity.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "If the system equates non-observation with nonexistence, it destroys continuity, loses history, duplicates entities on return, or makes unsafe decisions from false absence. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: Later presentations must inherit history, permissions, obligations, predictions, or provenance from an earlier presentation when they are the same entity. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Later presentations must inherit history, permissions, obligations, predictions, or provenance from an earlier presentation when they are the same entity.", "If the system equates non-observation with nonexistence, it destroys continuity, loses history, duplicates entities on return, or makes unsafe decisions from false absence."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "Later presentations must inherit history, permissions, obligations, predictions, or provenance from an earlier presentation when they are the same entity."}, {"display_text": "The cost of a false merge differs materially from the cost of a false split or premature retirement.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Retiring too quickly fragments identity, while retaining or matching too aggressively creates ghosts, false merges, surveillance, and invented certainty. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The cost of a false merge differs materially from the cost of a false split or premature retirement. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The cost of a false merge differs materially from the cost of a false split or premature retirement.", "Retiring too quickly fragments identity, while retaining or matching too aggressively creates ghosts, false merges, surveillance, and invented certainty."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The cost of a false merge differs materially from the cost of a false split or premature retirement."}, {"display_text": "Observation coverage, reporting delay, or detection probability can be estimated well enough to calibrate absence claims.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "If the system equates non-observation with nonexistence, it destroys continuity, loses history, duplicates entities on return, or makes unsafe decisions from false absence. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: Observation coverage, reporting delay, or detection probability can be estimated well enough to calibrate absence claims. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Observation coverage, reporting delay, or detection probability can be estimated well enough to calibrate absence claims.", "If the system equates non-observation with nonexistence, it destroys continuity, loses history, duplicates entities on return, or makes unsafe decisions from false absence."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Observation coverage, reporting delay, or detection probability can be estimated well enough to calibrate absence claims."}, {"display_text": "Multiple observers, replicas, or sensors may report the same entity at different times or under different identifiers.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Occlusion, sensor dropout, delayed reporting, disconnection, temporary disengagement, or sparse sampling makes an entity disappear from the current view even though it may continue to exist. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Multiple observers, replicas, or sensors may report the same entity at different times or under different identifiers. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Multiple observers, replicas, or sensors may report the same entity at different times or under different identifiers.", "Occlusion, sensor dropout, delayed reporting, disconnection, temporary disengagement, or sparse sampling makes an entity disappear from the current view even though it may continue to exist."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Multiple observers, replicas, or sensors may report the same entity at different times or under different identifiers."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 25, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-025", "ledger_sha256": "76200b75a06e3248bfbf5261cecd9026514948c65649dc5ad83d7089e91d8f7d"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": [{"groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "I attempted to preserve the complete exact DSA while falsifying the selected DNF branch; the candidate's constitutive roles and relations prevented such a counterexample.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Annotation Drift", "one_liner": "The gradual, undocumented shift over time in how annotators apply an unchanged rubric, so identical instances get different labels — a silent recalibration of a measurement instrument, invisible to within-slice agreement and detectable only by re-annotating frozen gold.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:annotation_drift", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "annotation_drift"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "annotation_drift", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P041-C01-U1", "why_it_fits": "Annotation drift constitutively compares labels supplied by annotator cohorts for identical frozen instances across time, satisfying the temporal DNF branch directly."}], "publication_role": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT_ONLY", "source_residual_occurrence_id": "r:entity_persistence_across_observation_gaps:b025_a13_c6", "unit": {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P041-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require plural reporting nodes rather than one observer producing all observations.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "At least two distinct observers, replicas, sensors, or equivalent reporting nodes are involved.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve common entity identity across the reports rather than merely similar entities.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The reports concern one and the same entity.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the directed reporter-to-report-to-entity relation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The reporting nodes issue or supply reports attributed to that entity.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve that such cross-node reporting may occur and must not require universal occurrence.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The condition is possible rather than asserted to occur in every system instance.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve temporal separation among reports about the same entity.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The reports occur at different times.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve identifier variation across reports while entity identity remains fixed.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The reports use different identifiers for the same entity.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Multiple observers, replicas, or sensors may report the same entity at different times or under different identifiers.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Multiple reporting nodes may attribute reports to one entity across different times or different identifiers.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P041-C01-U1"}}]}
{"archetype": {"name": "Entropy Export", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:entropy_export", "slug": "entropy_export"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 2, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 2 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 2}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is asymmetric visibility. The protected subsystem gets credit for looking orderly, while the downstream sink may accumulate the real burden. A clean dashboard may hide a growing quarantine table. A simple user interface may hide a support team drowning in exceptions. A tidy facility may hide environmental waste, storage, or remediation obligations.\n\nThis creates a moral hazard: once export feels free, the source has less incentive to reduce the disorder it creates. Responsible Entropy Export therefore treats boundary crossing as a governed transfer with continuing accountability.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A protected subsystem preserves local order by displacing generated disorder or burden to a receiving location that may be hidden, underfunded, overloaded, or harmed."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "This branch preserves the complete remedy-free diagnostic route; goals, feasibility clauses, gates, deployment constraints, and supporting context remain outside the DNF."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "EXT001-C034", "dnf": [["EXT001-U034-O1"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"obligation_id": "EXT001-U034-O1", "predicate": "Operation generates waste, heat, ambiguity, errors, residue, exception load, or unmanaged complexity."}], "predicate": "Operation generates waste, heat, ambiguity, errors, residue, exception load, or unmanaged complexity.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Operation generates waste, heat, ambiguity, errors, residue, exception load, or unmanaged complexity.", "unit_id": "EXT001-U034"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"catalog_exhaustion": "CONDITION_LEVEL", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Operation generates waste, heat, ambiguity, errors, residue, exception load, or unmanaged complexity.", "slug": "garbage_in_garbage_out"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Operation generates waste, heat, ambiguity, errors, residue, exception load, or unmanaged complexity.", "slug": "operationalization"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Operation generates waste, heat, ambiguity, errors, residue, exception load, or unmanaged complexity.", "slug": "efficiency"}], "residual_id": "EXT001:entropy_export:C01", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding."}}, "condition_id": "ext001_entropy_export_a01", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored trigger_conditions, structural_problem fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: Operation generates waste, heat, ambiguity, errors, residue, exception load, or unmanaged complexity.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Operation generates waste, heat, ambiguity, errors, residue, exception load, or unmanaged complexity."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "EXTENSION_COUNTEREXAMPLE_AUDIT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A frozen codebase that merely loses compatibility is bit rot and is excluded by the exact record; software entropy requires change-generated disorder.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Software Entropy", "one_liner": "Read a codebase's growing structural disorder as a predictable gradient under continuous modification: locally expedient edits flow toward the vast basin of working-but-disordered states, and order decays monotonically unless restoring engineering effort is continuously reinjected.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:software_entropy", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "software_entropy"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "software_entropy", "source_unit_id": "EXT001-U034", "why_it_fits": "Software entropy necessarily generates unmanaged structural complexity and disorder through continuous modification, satisfying one of the condition's illustrative manifestations."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Operation generates waste, heat, ambiguity, errors, residue, exception load, or unmanaged complexity.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "EXT001-C035", "dnf": [["EXT001-U035-O1"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"obligation_id": "EXT001-U035-O1", "predicate": "The burden is displaced to a distinct receiving location or population."}], "predicate": "The burden is displaced to a distinct receiving location or population.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "The burden is displaced to a distinct receiving location or population.", "unit_id": "EXT001-U035"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"catalog_exhaustion": "CONDITION_LEVEL", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The burden is displaced to a distinct receiving location or population.", "slug": "unevenness_waste"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The burden is displaced to a distinct receiving location or population.", "slug": "exposure_creep"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The burden is displaced to a distinct receiving location or population.", "slug": "dependency_distribution_concentration"}], "residual_id": "EXT001:entropy_export:C03", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding."}}, "condition_id": "ext001_entropy_export_a03", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored trigger_conditions, structural_problem fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: The burden is displaced to a distinct receiving location or population.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The burden is displaced to a distinct receiving location or population."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "EXTENSION_COUNTEREXAMPLE_AUDIT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Priced consensual transfer and true aggregate reduction are excluded by the exact record, leaving the involuntary displacement relation intact.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Risk Transfer Without Reduction", "one_liner": "The maladaptation pattern in which an adaptation or defence lowers risk at a protected site by displacing the unchanged hazard onto a voiceless neighbour, catchment, or future generation — because it acts on one node's exposure rather than the generative pressure.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:risk_transfer_without_reduction", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "risk_transfer_without_reduction"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "risk_transfer_without_reduction", "source_unit_id": "EXT001-U035", "why_it_fits": "Risk transfer without reduction necessarily displaces an undiminished burden from a protected beneficiary to a distinct, less-visible receiving population."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The burden is displaced to a distinct receiving location or population.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Keeping the generated burden inside the protected subsystem would degrade its function.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored trigger_conditions, structural_problem fields; the source file was not modified. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: Keeping the generated burden inside the protected subsystem would degrade its function. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Keeping the generated burden inside the protected subsystem would degrade its function.", "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored trigger_conditions, structural_problem fields; the source file was not modified."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "Keeping the generated burden inside the protected subsystem would degrade its function."}, {"display_text": "A receiving system or process can absorb or process the burden.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored trigger_conditions, structural_problem fields; the source file was not modified. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: A receiving system or process can absorb or process the burden. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A receiving system or process can absorb or process the burden.", "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored trigger_conditions, structural_problem fields; the source file was not modified."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "A receiving system or process can absorb or process the burden."}, {"display_text": "The transfer may impose a less visible cost, danger, delay, maintenance burden, pollution, or complexity.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored trigger_conditions, structural_problem fields; the source file was not modified. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: The transfer may impose a less visible cost, danger, delay, maintenance burden, pollution, or complexity. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The transfer may impose a less visible cost, danger, delay, maintenance burden, pollution, or complexity.", "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored trigger_conditions, structural_problem fields; the source file was not modified."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The transfer may impose a less visible cost, danger, delay, maintenance burden, pollution, or complexity."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"candidate_ledger_sha256": "96f72d2139077fd57bf795048ebef33b3fd574b20963170080ec916b5b3b92fe", "extension_id": "new-archetypes-extension-001", "ledger_id": "prime-production-v1.2-extension-001", "ledger_sha256": "9644520614744632d1d36da44b1acd77ce432852c6083eb871203521c166efce"}, "base_projection_sha256": "841e0c7f3cb8e8054475ad29a8a14745a416b4fc115559a44878b94292e673ec", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "ca09ed9fe1598ce7072755b530de5553f5ee0a7cd64ae82d9e4a4e2149a37788", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Entropy Management", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:entropy_management", "slug": "entropy_management"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 3, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 2, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 3 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is an unfavorable repair ratio: disorder accumulates faster than the system restores order. Production, growth, adaptation, and change all generate residue. If the system treats order as a free background condition, maintenance becomes invisible and deferred. The result is a slow loss of legibility and reliability: people cannot find the right record, understand why a decision was made, trust documentation, retire temporary fixes, or distinguish normal process from exception.\n\nThis is not merely messiness. The problem matters when disorder reduces the system's capacity to act correctly, learn, recover, or evolve.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Disorder, ambiguity, residue, information loss, or unmanaged complexity accumulates faster than the system restores order, progressively reducing legibility, reliability, or usability."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "This branch preserves the complete remedy-free diagnostic route; goals, feasibility clauses, gates, deployment constraints, and supporting context remain outside the DNF."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "EXT001-C036", "dnf": [["EXT001-U036-O1"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"obligation_id": "EXT001-U036-O1", "predicate": "The system accumulates stale records, debris, patches, abandoned assets, undocumented decisions, inconsistent terms, duplicate work, or ambiguous ownership."}], "predicate": "The system accumulates stale records, debris, patches, abandoned assets, undocumented decisions, inconsistent terms, duplicate work, or ambiguous ownership.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "The system accumulates stale records, debris, patches, abandoned assets, undocumented decisions, inconsistent terms, duplicate work, or ambiguous ownership.", "unit_id": "EXT001-U036"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"catalog_exhaustion": "CONDITION_LEVEL", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact record describes an intervention, control, or achieved configuration rather than a pre-existing situation that necessarily entails the atom.", "slug": "garbage_collection"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The system accumulates stale records, debris, patches, abandoned assets, undocumented decisions, inconsistent terms, duplicate work, or ambiguous ownership.", "slug": "versioning"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The system accumulates stale records, debris, patches, abandoned assets, undocumented decisions, inconsistent terms, duplicate work, or ambiguous ownership.", "slug": "retention_under_removal_uncertainty"}], "residual_id": "EXT001:entropy_management:C01", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding."}}, "condition_id": "ext001_entropy_management_a01", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored trigger_conditions, structural_problem fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: The system accumulates stale records, debris, patches, abandoned assets, undocumented decisions, inconsistent terms, duplicate work, or ambiguous ownership.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The system accumulates stale records, debris, patches, abandoned assets, undocumented decisions, inconsistent terms, duplicate work, or ambiguous ownership."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "EXTENSION_COUNTEREXAMPLE_AUDIT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A system whose code remains coherent despite modification is not a complete software-entropy instance, so it cannot preserve the DSA while falsifying accumulation.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Software Entropy", "one_liner": "Read a codebase's growing structural disorder as a predictable gradient under continuous modification: locally expedient edits flow toward the vast basin of working-but-disordered states, and order decays monotonically unless restoring engineering effort is continuously reinjected.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:software_entropy", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "software_entropy"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "software_entropy", "source_unit_id": "EXT001-U036", "why_it_fits": "Software entropy necessarily accumulates working-but-disordered edits, patches, and lost design coherence, satisfying the illustrative accumulation condition."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The system accumulates stale records, debris, patches, abandoned assets, undocumented decisions, inconsistent terms, duplicate work, or ambiguous ownership.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "EXT001-C037", "dnf": [["EXT001-U037-O1", "EXT001-U037-O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"obligation_id": "EXT001-U037-O1", "predicate": "Repeated change compounds disorder when restoring effort is not reinjected."}, {"obligation_id": "EXT001-U037-O2", "predicate": "Feature or production pressure repeatedly displaces restoring effort."}], "predicate": "Production work repeatedly displaces cleanup and renewal, allowing disorder to compound.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Production work repeatedly displaces cleanup and renewal, allowing disorder to compound.", "unit_id": "EXT001-U037"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"catalog_exhaustion": "CONDITION_LEVEL", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Production work repeatedly displaces cleanup and renewal, allowing disorder to compound.", "slug": "temporal_decay_and_degradation"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Production work repeatedly displaces cleanup and renewal, allowing disorder to compound.", "slug": "alienation"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Production work repeatedly displaces cleanup and renewal, allowing disorder to compound.", "slug": "maintenance"}], "residual_id": "EXT001:entropy_management:C02", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding."}}, "condition_id": "ext001_entropy_management_a02", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored trigger_conditions, structural_problem fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: Production work repeatedly displaces cleanup and renewal, allowing disorder to compound.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Production work repeatedly displaces cleanup and renewal, allowing disorder to compound."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "EXTENSION_COUNTEREXAMPLE_AUDIT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A software-entropy instance caused by unbudgeted restoration for some unrelated reason would falsify the unguarded condition, but the stated guard excludes exactly that counterexample without adding a new role or relation.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Software Entropy", "one_liner": "Read a codebase's growing structural disorder as a predictable gradient under continuous modification: locally expedient edits flow toward the vast basin of working-but-disordered states, and order decays monotonically unless restoring engineering effort is continuously reinjected.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:software_entropy", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["EXT001-U037-O2"], "guard_type": "CAUSAL_CONTEXT", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "production_pressure_displaces_restoring_effort", "predicate": "Feature or production pressure repeatedly displaces the restoring engineering effort needed to maintain order.", "rationale": "The qualifier supplies one candidate-anchored causal context for the already matching disorder-and-restoration spine; it adds no new principal role or unrelated relation."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "software_entropy"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "production_pressure_displaces_restoring_effort"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "software_entropy", "source_unit_id": "EXT001-U037", "why_it_fits": "Software entropy supplies the change-driven disorder gradient and required restoring-effort budget; the single guard fixes why that effort is repeatedly absent."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Production work repeatedly displaces cleanup and renewal, allowing disorder to compound.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "This branch preserves the complete remedy-free diagnostic route; goals, feasibility clauses, gates, deployment constraints, and supporting context remain outside the DNF."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "EXT001-C038", "dnf": [["EXT001-U038-O1"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"obligation_id": "EXT001-U038-O1", "predicate": "Artifacts persist while their context, provenance, rationale, ownership, or interpretation decays."}], "predicate": "Artifacts persist while their context, provenance, rationale, ownership, or interpretation decays.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Artifacts persist while their context, provenance, rationale, ownership, or interpretation decays.", "unit_id": "EXT001-U038"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"catalog_exhaustion": "CONDITION_LEVEL", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Artifacts persist while their context, provenance, rationale, ownership, or interpretation decays.", "slug": "chestertons_fence"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Artifacts persist while their context, provenance, rationale, ownership, or interpretation decays.", "slug": "memoing"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Artifacts persist while their context, provenance, rationale, ownership, or interpretation decays.", "slug": "provenance"}], "residual_id": "EXT001:entropy_management:C03", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding."}}, "condition_id": "ext001_entropy_management_a03", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored trigger_conditions, structural_problem fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: Artifacts persist while their context, provenance, rationale, ownership, or interpretation decays.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Artifacts persist while their context, provenance, rationale, ownership, or interpretation decays."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Artifacts persist while their context, provenance, rationale, ownership, or interpretation decays.", "slug": "chestertons_fence"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Artifacts persist while their context, provenance, rationale, ownership, or interpretation decays.", "slug": "memoing"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Artifacts persist while their context, provenance, rationale, ownership, or interpretation decays.", "slug": "provenance"}], "normalized_requirement": "Artifacts persist while their context, provenance, rationale, ownership, or interpretation decays.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Artifacts persist while their context, provenance, rationale, ownership, or interpretation decays.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "This branch preserves the complete remedy-free diagnostic route; goals, feasibility clauses, gates, deployment constraints, and supporting context remain outside the DNF."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "EXT001-C039", "dnf": [["EXT001-U039-O1"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"obligation_id": "EXT001-U039-O1", "predicate": "Temporary workarounds, overrides, and edge-case procedures become normalized."}], "predicate": "Temporary workarounds, overrides, and edge-case procedures become normalized.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Temporary workarounds, overrides, and edge-case procedures become normalized.", "unit_id": "EXT001-U039"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"catalog_exhaustion": "CONDITION_LEVEL", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Temporary workarounds, overrides, and edge-case procedures become normalized.", "slug": "scaffolding"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Temporary workarounds, overrides, and edge-case procedures become normalized.", "slug": "incident_response"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Temporary workarounds, overrides, and edge-case procedures become normalized.", "slug": "conditional_probability"}], "residual_id": "EXT001:entropy_management:C04", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding."}}, "condition_id": "ext001_entropy_management_a04", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored trigger_conditions, structural_problem fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: Temporary workarounds, overrides, and edge-case procedures become normalized.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Temporary workarounds, overrides, and edge-case procedures become normalized."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Temporary workarounds, overrides, and edge-case procedures become normalized.", "slug": "scaffolding"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Temporary workarounds, overrides, and edge-case procedures become normalized.", "slug": "incident_response"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Temporary workarounds, overrides, and edge-case procedures become normalized.", "slug": "conditional_probability"}], "normalized_requirement": "Temporary workarounds, overrides, and edge-case procedures become normalized.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Temporary workarounds, overrides, and edge-case procedures become normalized.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The system allocates no explicit capacity or authority for maintaining order.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored trigger_conditions, structural_problem fields; the source file was not modified. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The system allocates no explicit capacity or authority for maintaining order. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The system allocates no explicit capacity or authority for maintaining order.", "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored trigger_conditions, structural_problem fields; the source file was not modified."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The system allocates no explicit capacity or authority for maintaining order."}, {"display_text": "Cleanup work is hidden, undervalued, or informally assigned.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored trigger_conditions, structural_problem fields; the source file was not modified. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Cleanup work is hidden, undervalued, or informally assigned. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Cleanup work is hidden, undervalued, or informally assigned.", "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored trigger_conditions, structural_problem fields; the source file was not modified."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Cleanup work is hidden, undervalued, or informally assigned."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"candidate_ledger_sha256": "96f72d2139077fd57bf795048ebef33b3fd574b20963170080ec916b5b3b92fe", "extension_id": "new-archetypes-extension-001", "ledger_id": "prime-production-v1.2-extension-001", "ledger_sha256": "9644520614744632d1d36da44b1acd77ce432852c6083eb871203521c166efce"}, "base_projection_sha256": "841e0c7f3cb8e8054475ad29a8a14745a416b4fc115559a44878b94292e673ec", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "ca09ed9fe1598ce7072755b530de5553f5ee0a7cd64ae82d9e4a4e2149a37788", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Entry-Boundary Friction Calibration", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:entry_boundary_friction_calibration", "slug": "entry_boundary_friction_calibration"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A membership boundary imposes asymmetric crossing costs on outsiders or newcomers, and those costs become a hidden selection mechanism. The formal eligibility rule may remain unchanged, but the inside population becomes biased toward those with money, time, location, credentials, language, networks, confidence, or slack rather than those most qualified or intended to participate.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A membership boundary imposes asymmetric crossing costs on outsiders or newcomers, and those costs become a hidden selection mechanism. The formal eligibility rule may remain unchanged, but the inside population becomes biased toward those with money, time, location, credentials, language, networks, confidence, or slack rather than those most qualified or intended to participate."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires a membership boundary and distinct insider and outsider populations.", "role_mapping": "Membership distinction -> status boundary.", "slug": "access_friction", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b025_a14_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A system distinguishes insiders from outsiders, members from nonmembers, approved from unapproved, or eligible from not-yet-present. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A system distinguishes insiders from outsiders, members from nonmembers, approved from unapproved, or eligible from not-yet-present."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Access Friction", "one_liner": "An entry-asymmetric cost paid only by those crossing a membership boundary, shaping who is present rather than who is qualified.", "page_ref": "prime:access_friction", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Membership distinction -> status boundary.", "slug": "access_friction", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires a membership boundary and distinct insider and outsider populations."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A status boundary separates insiders from outsiders or members from nonmembers.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a crossing-specific cost realized in capital, information, reputation, regulation, social standing, or computation.", "role_mapping": "Listed burdens -> entry-cost currencies.", "slug": "access_friction", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b025_a14_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Crossing requires time, payment, paperwork, travel, synchronous attendance, social exposure, migration effort, credential translation, jargon fluency, or repeated attempts. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Crossing requires time, payment, paperwork, travel, synchronous attendance, social exposure, migration effort, credential translation, jargon fluency, or repeated attempts."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Access Friction", "one_liner": "An entry-asymmetric cost paid only by those crossing a membership boundary, shaping who is present rather than who is qualified.", "page_ref": "prime:access_friction", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Listed burdens -> entry-cost currencies.", "slug": "access_friction", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a crossing-specific cost realized in capital, information, reputation, regulation, social standing, or computation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Crossing requires time, money, paperwork, travel, social exposure, translation, fluency, or repeated effort.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Entry-versus-ongoing asymmetry is the defining invariant: outsiders pay the crossing cost and membership erases it.", "role_mapping": "Newcomer cost -> entry tax; insider cost -> erased after membership.", "slug": "access_friction", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b025_a14_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Incumbents or insiders do not pay the same costs to remain inside that newcomers pay to enter. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Incumbents or insiders do not pay the same costs to remain inside that newcomers pay to enter."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Access Friction", "one_liner": "An entry-asymmetric cost paid only by those crossing a membership boundary, shaping who is present rather than who is qualified.", "page_ref": "prime:access_friction", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Newcomer cost -> entry tax; insider cost -> erased after membership.", "slug": "access_friction", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Entry-versus-ongoing asymmetry is the defining invariant: outsiders pay the crossing cost and membership erases it."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Insiders do not pay the crossing costs newcomers bear.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The mandatory composition filter makes observed membership reflect who could afford to cross rather than who was qualified.", "role_mapping": "Observed population -> insiders; resource tracking -> entry-cost selection.", "slug": "access_friction", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b025_a14_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The observed population differs from the plausible qualified population in ways that track resources, position, or insider knowledge. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The observed population differs from the plausible qualified population in ways that track resources, position, or insider knowledge."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Access Friction", "one_liner": "An entry-asymmetric cost paid only by those crossing a membership boundary, shaping who is present rather than who is qualified.", "page_ref": "prime:access_friction", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Observed population -> insiders; resource tracking -> entry-cost selection.", "slug": "access_friction", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The mandatory composition filter makes observed membership reflect who could afford to cross rather than who was qualified."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Observed membership differs from the plausibly qualified population along resources, position, or insider knowledge.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The boundary purpose is legitimate, but some crossing costs are incidental, historical, avoidable, or disproportionate.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A membership boundary imposes asymmetric crossing costs on outsiders or newcomers, and those costs become a hidden selection mechanism. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The boundary purpose is legitimate, but some crossing costs are incidental, historical, avoidable, or disproportionate. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The boundary purpose is legitimate, but some crossing costs are incidental, historical, avoidable, or disproportionate.", "A membership boundary imposes asymmetric crossing costs on outsiders or newcomers, and those costs become a hidden selection mechanism."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "The boundary purpose is legitimate, but some crossing costs are incidental, historical, avoidable, or disproportionate."}, {"display_text": "Reducing friction could expand access, but uncontrolled reduction could threaten safety, capacity, fraud control, or quality standards.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Boundaries need some friction to protect standards, capacity, safety, and commitment, but the wrong friction converts a qualification boundary into a resource-slack boundary. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: Reducing friction could expand access, but uncontrolled reduction could threaten safety, capacity, fraud control, or quality standards. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Reducing friction could expand access, but uncontrolled reduction could threaten safety, capacity, fraud control, or quality standards.", "Boundaries need some friction to protect standards, capacity, safety, and commitment, but the wrong friction converts a qualification boundary into a resource-slack boundary."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Reducing friction could expand access, but uncontrolled reduction could threaten safety, capacity, fraud control, or quality standards."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 25, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-025", "ledger_sha256": "76200b75a06e3248bfbf5261cecd9026514948c65649dc5ad83d7089e91d8f7d"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Epistemic Boundary Permeability Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:epistemic_boundary_permeability_design", "slug": "epistemic_boundary_permeability_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A group, community, audience, team, discipline, platform segment, or institutional subculture receives a systematically filtered stream of information. Confirming signals are abundant, rewarded, and repeated; disconfirming or moderating signals are excluded, caricatured, mistrusted, or algorithmically down-ranked. Members therefore experience their environment as complete even while the boundary is actively shaping what can be learned.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A group, community, audience, team, discipline, platform segment, or institutional subculture receives a systematically filtered stream of information. Confirming signals are abundant, rewarded, and repeated; disconfirming or moderating signals are excluded, caricatured, mistrusted, or algorithmically down-ranked. Members therefore experience their environment as complete even while the boundary is actively shaping what can be learned."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires a bounded belief community and an input filter produced through homophily, curation, trust topology, language, or culture.", "role_mapping": "Community boundary -> bounded believers; intake filter -> selective information channel.", "slug": "echo_chamber", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b025_a15_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A group, community, audience, team, discipline, platform segment, or institutional subculture receives a systematically filtered stream of information. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Information intake is bounded by community membership, platform logic, professional culture, or affiliation.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Information intake is bounded by community membership, platform logic, professional culture, or affiliation", "A group, community, audience, team, discipline, platform segment, or institutional subculture receives a systematically filtered stream of information."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Echo Chamber", "one_liner": "A bounded community whose input filter and internal reinforcement gradient amplify shared beliefs and strip out the corrective signal that would moderate them, while members experience the environment as complete rather than filtered.", "page_ref": "prime:echo_chamber", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Community boundary -> bounded believers; intake filter -> selective information channel.", "slug": "echo_chamber", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires a bounded belief community and an input filter produced through homophily, curation, trust topology, language, or culture."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Information intake is bounded by community membership, platform logic, professional culture, or affiliation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A reinforcement gradient rewards agreement while dissent is costly and correction is weakened.", "role_mapping": "Internal reinforcement -> status for agreement; external correction -> dissent cost and filter.", "slug": "echo_chamber", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b025_a15_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Internal reinforcement is stronger than external correction. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Internal reinforcement is stronger than external correction"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Echo Chamber", "one_liner": "A bounded community whose input filter and internal reinforcement gradient amplify shared beliefs and strip out the corrective signal that would moderate them, while members experience the environment as complete rather than filtered.", "page_ref": "prime:echo_chamber", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Internal reinforcement -> status for agreement; external correction -> dissent cost and filter.", "slug": "echo_chamber", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A reinforcement gradient rewards agreement while dissent is costly and correction is weakened."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Internal reinforcement is stronger than external correction.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The input filter strips disconfirmation and the self-sealing meta-belief recasts external information as hostile or low quality.", "role_mapping": "Missing correction -> excluded disconfirmation; pre-discredited -> self-sealing meta-belief.", "slug": "echo_chamber", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b025_a15_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Communities need boundaries to preserve relevance, safety, expertise, trust, and identity, but those same boundaries can remove the corrective signals that keep belief formation tethered to reality. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Corrective signals are missing or pre-discredited.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Corrective signals are missing or pre-discredited", "Communities need boundaries to preserve relevance, safety, expertise, trust, and identity, but those same boundaries can remove the corrective signals that keep belief formation tethered to reality."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Echo Chamber", "one_liner": "A bounded community whose input filter and internal reinforcement gradient amplify shared beliefs and strip out the corrective signal that would moderate them, while members experience the environment as complete rather than filtered.", "page_ref": "prime:echo_chamber", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Missing correction -> excluded disconfirmation; pre-discredited -> self-sealing meta-belief.", "slug": "echo_chamber", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The input filter strips disconfirmation and the self-sealing meta-belief recasts external information as hostile or low quality."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Corrective signals are missing or pre-discredited.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Experienced-as-complete rather than filtered is an explicit defining invariant.", "role_mapping": "Experienced completeness -> chamber's self-concealment.", "slug": "echo_chamber", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b025_a15_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Members experience the environment as complete. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Members experience the environment as complete"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Echo Chamber", "one_liner": "A bounded community whose input filter and internal reinforcement gradient amplify shared beliefs and strip out the corrective signal that would moderate them, while members experience the environment as complete rather than filtered.", "page_ref": "prime:echo_chamber", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Experienced completeness -> chamber's self-concealment.", "slug": "echo_chamber", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Experienced-as-complete rather than filtered is an explicit defining invariant."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Members experience the filtered environment as complete.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Decisions, norms, or beliefs are consequential.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Decisions, norms, or beliefs are consequential. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Decisions, norms, or beliefs are consequential"]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Decisions, norms, or beliefs are consequential"}, {"display_text": "Direct confrontation would likely backfire.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: Direct confrontation would likely backfire. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Direct confrontation would likely backfire"]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Direct confrontation would likely backfire"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 25, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-025", "ledger_sha256": "76200b75a06e3248bfbf5261cecd9026514948c65649dc5ad83d7089e91d8f7d"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Epistemic Inclusion Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:epistemic_inclusion_design", "slug": "epistemic_inclusion_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 6, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 3, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 3 of 6 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is unfair exclusion from the production, interpretation, or use of knowledge. Some actors are treated as credible knowers by default, while others must translate themselves into unfamiliar categories or provide excessive proof. Some experiences cannot become actionable because the shared vocabulary lacks the right concepts. Some groups are consulted but cannot change the evidence standard, category system, model, diagnosis, or policy they are asked to comment on.\n\nThis creates knowledge that looks complete but is structurally partial. It may be technically polished, professionally endorsed, and well documented while still failing to represent the realities it governs.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A knowledge process claims to represent reality, evidence, user needs, risk, or valid interpretation while excluding people who hold relevant situated knowledge, discounting their credibility, or lacking the concepts needed to make their experience intelligible."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P041-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must type the absent contributors as affected people, not unrelated observers or generic stakeholders.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The excluded actors are people affected by the claim's subject matter.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a claim about the affected population's situated condition rather than an unrelated proposition.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A focal knowledge claim concerns the affected people's reality, needs, risk, or an equivalent situated condition.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve exclusion from claim formation, not mere disagreement after participation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The affected people are not involved in forming that knowledge claim.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Affected people are absent from forming a knowledge claim about their reality, needs, or risk.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "People affected by a focal condition are excluded from forming the knowledge claim about it.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P041-C02-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Epistemic injustice requires identity-tracking credibility or interpretive-resource harm; affected people can be absent for ordinary logistical reasons.", "slug": "epistemic_justice"}], "residual_id": "r:epistemic_inclusion_design:b026_a01_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b026_a01_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Affected people are not involved in forming the knowledge claim. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Affected people are not involved in forming the knowledge claim."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Epistemic injustice requires identity-tracking credibility or interpretive-resource harm; affected people can be absent for ordinary logistical reasons.", "slug": "epistemic_justice"}], "normalized_requirement": "Affected people are absent from forming a knowledge claim about their reality, needs, or risk.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Affected people are absent from forming a knowledge claim about their reality, needs, or risk.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires systematic credibility deflation tied to social identity or prejudicial status rather than epistemically relevant evidence.", "role_mapping": "Testifier -> knower; discounted testimony -> prejudicial credibility allocation.", "slug": "epistemic_justice", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b026_a01_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Certain testimony is repeatedly discounted as anecdotal, emotional, biased, or low status. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Certain testimony is repeatedly discounted as anecdotal, emotional, biased, or low status."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Epistemic Justice", "one_liner": "Fair knowledge production.", "page_ref": "prime:epistemic_justice", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Testifier -> knower; discounted testimony -> prejudicial credibility allocation.", "slug": "epistemic_justice", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires systematic credibility deflation tied to social identity or prejudicial status rather than epistemically relevant evidence."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Testimony is repeatedly discounted as anecdotal, emotional, biased, or low status.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Hermeneutical injustice in the exact record is a lack of shared interpretive resources that makes experience unintelligible.", "role_mapping": "Missing vocabulary -> interpretive-resource unavailability.", "slug": "epistemic_justice", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b026_a01_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The existing vocabulary cannot capture what people are describing. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The existing vocabulary cannot capture what people are describing."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Epistemic Justice", "one_liner": "Fair knowledge production.", "page_ref": "prime:epistemic_justice", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Missing vocabulary -> interpretive-resource unavailability.", "slug": "epistemic_justice", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Hermeneutical injustice in the exact record is a lack of shared interpretive resources that makes experience unintelligible."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Available vocabulary cannot make affected people's experience intelligible.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P041-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a schema that structures knowledge rather than an unstructured individual opinion.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A model, taxonomy, diagnosis, evidence standard, or equivalent knowledge schema is present.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the group-specific source of the encoded worldview.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A focal worldview belongs to one social group.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the knowledge schema as the encoding or representational carrier and the group's worldview as the encoded content.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The knowledge schema encodes that group's worldview in its categories, assumptions, or standards.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve silent or unmarked encoding rather than an openly declared group-specific perspective.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The group-specific encoding is not made explicit as such.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "A model, taxonomy, diagnosis, or evidence standard silently encodes one group's worldview.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A knowledge-representation schema implicitly encodes one group's worldview.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P041-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Classification can be explicitly plural and need not privilege one group's worldview.", "slug": "classification"}], "residual_id": "r:epistemic_inclusion_design:b026_a01_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b026_a01_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A model, taxonomy, diagnosis, or evidence standard silently encodes one group’s worldview. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A model, taxonomy, diagnosis, or evidence standard silently encodes one group’s worldview."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Classification can be explicitly plural and need not privilege one group's worldview.", "slug": "classification"}], "normalized_requirement": "A model, taxonomy, diagnosis, or evidence standard silently encodes one group's worldview.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A model, taxonomy, diagnosis, or evidence standard silently encodes one group's worldview.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B5", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P041-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve actual consultation rather than its complete absence.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A consultation process occurs concerning a focal decision.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve effective closure rather than a still-open decision merely under discussion.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The focal decision is effectively fixed or made, even if formal ratification remains.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve identity of the consulted subject and the already-fixed decision.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The consultation and effective closure concern the same decision.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve post-closure consultation and cannot substitute consultation before or during decision formation.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Effective decision closure precedes the consultation.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must exclude a process that consults both before and after closure; the source requires consultation only after the decision is effectively fixed.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "No consultation concerning that same decision occurs before its effective closure.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Consultation occurs only after the decision is effectively fixed.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Consultation concerning a decision occurs only after that decision has effectively been made.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P041-C04-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Due process can provide timely notice and hearing before a decision; it does not entail post-decision consultation.", "slug": "procedural_fairness_due_process"}], "residual_id": "r:epistemic_inclusion_design:b026_a01_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b026_a01_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Consultation happens after the decision has effectively been made. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Consultation happens after the decision has effectively been made."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A team can consult customers genuinely, then fix the plan, and later conduct decision-insulated discovery theater; that candidate instance violates O5 without defeating the DSA.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Customer-Discovery Theater", "one_liner": "Diagnose fake product discovery by the single structural test of whether the inquiry is permitted to change the plan — the tell being a long track record of discovery that has never killed or redirected a roadmap.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:customer_discovery_theater", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O5"], "guard_type": "TIMING_BINDING", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "no_prior_consultation_same_plan", "predicate": "No consultation about the focal plan occurred before the pre-staked commitment.", "rationale": "The exact candidate supplies the principal spine and the single anchored guard fills only the identified contingent gap without laundering the unit head."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "customer_discovery_theater"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "no_prior_consultation_same_plan"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "customer_discovery_theater", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P041-C04-U1", "why_it_fits": "The candidate directly supplies the consultation, same fixed decision, and closure-before-performed-inquiry relation. One atomic timing guard supplies only the otherwise-unfixed absence of earlier same-decision consultation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Consultation occurs only after the decision is effectively fixed.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 5", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B6", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P041-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve nominal or actual participation rather than total exclusion.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A participatory process actually exists.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a knowledge-structuring object rather than an unrelated operational outcome.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A focal model, taxonomy, evidentiary frame, or equivalent knowledge structure is at issue.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve lack of effective change capacity, not merely a case in which participants happened not to propose a change.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Participant input cannot alter that knowledge structure.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "Participation exists but cannot alter the knowledge structure.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Participation occurs but has no capacity to change the focal knowledge structure.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P041-C05-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A successful epistemic-justice response expands contribution and interpretive resources rather than requiring powerless participation.", "slug": "epistemic_justice"}], "residual_id": "r:epistemic_inclusion_design:b026_a01_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b026_a01_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Participation exists but does not change the knowledge structure. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Participation exists but does not change the knowledge structure."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A successful epistemic-justice response expands contribution and interpretive resources rather than requiring powerless participation.", "slug": "epistemic_justice"}], "normalized_requirement": "Participation exists but cannot alter the knowledge structure.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Participation exists but cannot alter the knowledge structure.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 6", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "DISJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 26, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-026", "ledger_sha256": "847cddc1fda93cf1363663c6851e2a324cbe76f36d2c8bb092003b940b38f6c1"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Equilibrium-Aware Capacity Intervention Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:equilibrium_aware_capacity_intervention_design", "slug": "equilibrium_aware_capacity_intervention_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 5, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A network, queue, platform, workflow, or infrastructure system is modified by adding an apparently beneficial path, capacity increment, shortcut, or access option. Users then self-optimize around the new choice set, shifting the equilibrium so aggregate performance worsens through congestion, bottleneck migration, overuse of a shared segment, induced demand, priority-lane capture, or price-of-anarchy expansion.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A network, queue, platform, workflow, or infrastructure system is modified by adding an apparently beneficial path, capacity increment, shortcut, or access option. Users then self-optimize around the new choice set, shifting the equilibrium so aggregate performance worsens through congestion, bottleneck migration, overuse of a shared segment, induced demand, priority-lane capture, or price-of-anarchy expansion."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The non-monotone invariant requires adding a locally attractive network option or capacity increment.", "role_mapping": "Proposed option -> added route or edge.", "slug": "braess_paradox", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b026_a02_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A capacity, route, lane, channel, priority option, bypass, replica, failover path, or shortcut is proposed or recently introduced. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A capacity, route, lane, channel, priority option, bypass, replica, failover path, or shortcut is proposed or recently introduced."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Braess's Paradox", "one_liner": "Adding capacity to a network of self-optimizing users can shift the equilibrium and make aggregate performance worse.", "page_ref": "prime:braess_paradox", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Proposed option -> added route or edge.", "slug": "braess_paradox", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The non-monotone invariant requires adding a locally attractive network option or capacity increment."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A capacity, path, lane, bypass, or shortcut is proposed or newly added.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires self-interested routing agents choosing local best responses without global optimization.", "role_mapping": "Independent users -> routing agents; choice -> best response.", "slug": "braess_paradox", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b026_a02_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Users, clients, teams, drivers, jobs, or agents can independently choose among paths or resource options. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Users, clients, teams, drivers, jobs, or agents can independently choose among paths or resource options."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Braess's Paradox", "one_liner": "Adding capacity to a network of self-optimizing users can shift the equilibrium and make aggregate performance worse.", "page_ref": "prime:braess_paradox", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Independent users -> routing agents; choice -> best response.", "slug": "braess_paradox", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires self-interested routing agents choosing local best responses without global optimization."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Users or agents independently choose among paths or resource options.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Each agent minimizes private cost while ignoring the load externality imposed on others, selecting an equilibrium separated from the social optimum.", "role_mapping": "Local cost -> agent best response; system cost -> aggregate equilibrium.", "slug": "braess_paradox", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b026_a02_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Local user cost differs from whole-system cost, or users do not internalize congestion imposed on others. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Local user cost differs from whole-system cost, or users do not internalize congestion imposed on others."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Braess's Paradox", "one_liner": "Adding capacity to a network of self-optimizing users can shift the equilibrium and make aggregate performance worse.", "page_ref": "prime:braess_paradox", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Local cost -> agent best response; system cost -> aggregate equilibrium.", "slug": "braess_paradox", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Each agent minimizes private cost while ignoring the load externality imposed on others, selecting an equilibrium separated from the social optimum."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Local user cost diverges from whole-system cost because congestion externalities are not internalized.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P041-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an added or proposed option rather than only an existing flow.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A proposed path, capacity increment, shortcut, access option, or equivalent new option is focal.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a downstream limiting or shared element.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A downstream segment, bottleneck, queue, dependency, or equivalent constraint is present.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve shared use rather than a constraint exclusive to the new option.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The downstream element is shared by the new option and at least one existing flow or user path.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the directed option-to-downstream connection.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The proposed option connects to or feeds into that shared downstream element.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "The new option connects to a shared downstream segment, bottleneck, queue, dependency, or constraint.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A proposed new option feeds into a downstream constraint shared with existing flows.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P041-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Braess requires load-sensitive network edges but the added link need not enter a distinct shared downstream segment or bottleneck.", "slug": "braess_paradox"}], "residual_id": "r:equilibrium_aware_capacity_intervention_design:b026_a02_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b026_a02_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The proposed option connects to a shared downstream segment, bottleneck, dependency, queue, or constraint. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The proposed option connects to a shared downstream segment, bottleneck, dependency, queue, or constraint."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Braess requires load-sensitive network edges but the added link need not enter a distinct shared downstream segment or bottleneck.", "slug": "braess_paradox"}], "normalized_requirement": "The new option connects to a shared downstream segment, bottleneck, queue, dependency, or constraint.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The new option connects to a shared downstream segment, bottleneck, queue, dependency, or constraint.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Capacity affects performance only through the decentralized equilibrium it induces, and the added option changes best responses.", "role_mapping": "Capacity change -> choice-set change; incentive effect -> equilibrium shift.", "slug": "braess_paradox", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b026_a02_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Adding capacity changes incentives, defaults, path visibility, or perceived convenience, not just physical throughput. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Adding capacity changes incentives, defaults, path visibility, or perceived convenience, not just physical throughput."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Braess's Paradox", "one_liner": "Adding capacity to a network of self-optimizing users can shift the equilibrium and make aggregate performance worse.", "page_ref": "prime:braess_paradox", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Capacity change -> choice-set change; incentive effect -> equilibrium shift.", "slug": "braess_paradox", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Capacity affects performance only through the decentralized equilibrium it induces, and the added option changes best responses."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Adding capacity changes incentives and route choice rather than only physical throughput.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A valid instance requires route-choice equilibrium to shift after an added option and aggregate cost to rise.", "role_mapping": "Migration -> changed equilibrium; overload -> worse aggregate performance.", "slug": "braess_paradox", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b026_a02_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Historical, simulated, or pilot data shows route migration, queue migration, induced demand, or overload after apparent capacity gains. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Historical, simulated, or pilot data shows route migration, queue migration, induced demand, or overload after apparent capacity gains."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Braess's Paradox", "one_liner": "Adding capacity to a network of self-optimizing users can shift the equilibrium and make aggregate performance worse.", "page_ref": "prime:braess_paradox", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Migration -> changed equilibrium; overload -> worse aggregate performance.", "slug": "braess_paradox", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A valid instance requires route-choice equilibrium to shift after an added option and aggregate cost to rise."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Observed or simulated behavior shows route migration or overload after an apparent capacity gain.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The organization is tempted to relieve a visible bottleneck without modeling where the bottleneck will migrate.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The organization is tempted to relieve a visible bottleneck without modeling where the bottleneck will migrate. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The organization is tempted to relieve a visible bottleneck without modeling where the bottleneck will migrate."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "The organization is tempted to relieve a visible bottleneck without modeling where the bottleneck will migrate."}, {"display_text": "There is no reversible pilot, pricing rule, throttling rule, or closure process if aggregate outcomes degrade.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: There is no reversible pilot, pricing rule, throttling rule, or closure process if aggregate outcomes degrade. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["There is no reversible pilot, pricing rule, throttling rule, or closure process if aggregate outcomes degrade."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 8, "text": "There is no reversible pilot, pricing rule, throttling rule, or closure process if aggregate outcomes degrade."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 26, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-026", "ledger_sha256": "847cddc1fda93cf1363663c6851e2a324cbe76f36d2c8bb092003b940b38f6c1"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Equilibrium Restoration", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:equilibrium_restoration", "slug": "equilibrium_restoration"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is dominance of one variable over the counterforces that normally keep a system workable. A service queue grows because intake overwhelms capacity. A decision system tilts because one group has voice without accountability. A budget becomes unstable because commitments exceed reliable inflows. An ecosystem degrades because an invasive pressure or missing species changes the relation among flows.\n\nThe common form is not “bad state.” It is a relation outside range. That distinction matters because the intervention should target the relation, not just the most visible symptom.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system has left a viable balance because one force, flow, burden, incentive, or pressure dominates and ordinary self-correction cannot restore it."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "This branch preserves the complete remedy-free diagnostic route; goals, feasibility clauses, gates, deployment constraints, and supporting context remain outside the DNF."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "EXT001-C042", "dnf": [["EXT001-U042-O1"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"obligation_id": "EXT001-U042-O1", "predicate": "One variable rises, falls, or concentrates enough to destabilize the relation among parts."}], "predicate": "One variable rises, falls, or concentrates enough to destabilize the relation among parts.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "One variable rises, falls, or concentrates enough to destabilize the relation among parts.", "unit_id": "EXT001-U042"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"catalog_exhaustion": "CONDITION_LEVEL", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: One variable rises, falls, or concentrates enough to destabilize the relation among parts.", "slug": "statistical_independence"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: One variable rises, falls, or concentrates enough to destabilize the relation among parts.", "slug": "irreducible_floor"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: One variable rises, falls, or concentrates enough to destabilize the relation among parts.", "slug": "unearned_windfall_mechanism_atrophy"}], "residual_id": "EXT001:equilibrium_restoration:C01", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding."}}, "condition_id": "ext001_equilibrium_restoration_a01", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored trigger_conditions, structural_problem fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: One variable rises, falls, or concentrates enough to destabilize the relation among parts.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["One variable rises, falls, or concentrates enough to destabilize the relation among parts."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: One variable rises, falls, or concentrates enough to destabilize the relation among parts.", "slug": "statistical_independence"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: One variable rises, falls, or concentrates enough to destabilize the relation among parts.", "slug": "irreducible_floor"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: One variable rises, falls, or concentrates enough to destabilize the relation among parts.", "slug": "unearned_windfall_mechanism_atrophy"}], "normalized_requirement": "One variable rises, falls, or concentrates enough to destabilize the relation among parts.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "One variable rises, falls, or concentrates enough to destabilize the relation among parts.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "EXT001-C043", "dnf": [["EXT001-U043-O1"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"obligation_id": "EXT001-U043-O1", "predicate": "The system crosses a practical threshold at which functioning, fairness, reliability, or safety degrades."}], "predicate": "The system crosses a practical threshold at which functioning, fairness, reliability, or safety degrades.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "The system crosses a practical threshold at which functioning, fairness, reliability, or safety degrades.", "unit_id": "EXT001-U043"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"catalog_exhaustion": "CONDITION_LEVEL", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The system crosses a practical threshold at which functioning, fairness, reliability, or safety degrades.", "slug": "temporal_decay_and_degradation"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The system crosses a practical threshold at which functioning, fairness, reliability, or safety degrades.", "slug": "tolerance_paradox"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The system crosses a practical threshold at which functioning, fairness, reliability, or safety degrades.", "slug": "near_miss_normalization"}], "residual_id": "EXT001:equilibrium_restoration:C02", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding."}}, "condition_id": "ext001_equilibrium_restoration_a02", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored trigger_conditions, structural_problem fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: The system crosses a practical threshold at which functioning, fairness, reliability, or safety degrades.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The system crosses a practical threshold at which functioning, fairness, reliability, or safety degrades."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The system crosses a practical threshold at which functioning, fairness, reliability, or safety degrades.", "slug": "temporal_decay_and_degradation"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The system crosses a practical threshold at which functioning, fairness, reliability, or safety degrades.", "slug": "tolerance_paradox"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The system crosses a practical threshold at which functioning, fairness, reliability, or safety degrades.", "slug": "near_miss_normalization"}], "normalized_requirement": "The system crosses a practical threshold at which functioning, fairness, reliability, or safety degrades.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The system crosses a practical threshold at which functioning, fairness, reliability, or safety degrades.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "EXT001-C044", "dnf": [["EXT001-U044-O1"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"obligation_id": "EXT001-U044-O1", "predicate": "Local adaptation or ordinary feedback is too weak, delayed, or misaligned to restore balance."}], "predicate": "Local adaptation or ordinary feedback is too weak, delayed, or misaligned to restore balance.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Local adaptation or ordinary feedback is too weak, delayed, or misaligned to restore balance.", "unit_id": "EXT001-U044"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"catalog_exhaustion": "CONDITION_LEVEL", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Local adaptation or ordinary feedback is too weak, delayed, or misaligned to restore balance.", "slug": "withdrawal_rebound"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Local adaptation or ordinary feedback is too weak, delayed, or misaligned to restore balance.", "slug": "overshoot_and_collapse"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Local adaptation or ordinary feedback is too weak, delayed, or misaligned to restore balance.", "slug": "premature_optimization"}], "residual_id": "EXT001:equilibrium_restoration:C03", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding."}}, "condition_id": "ext001_equilibrium_restoration_a03", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored trigger_conditions, structural_problem fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: Local adaptation or ordinary feedback is too weak, delayed, or misaligned to restore balance.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Local adaptation or ordinary feedback is too weak, delayed, or misaligned to restore balance."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Local adaptation or ordinary feedback is too weak, delayed, or misaligned to restore balance.", "slug": "withdrawal_rebound"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Local adaptation or ordinary feedback is too weak, delayed, or misaligned to restore balance.", "slug": "overshoot_and_collapse"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Local adaptation or ordinary feedback is too weak, delayed, or misaligned to restore balance.", "slug": "premature_optimization"}], "normalized_requirement": "Local adaptation or ordinary feedback is too weak, delayed, or misaligned to restore balance.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Local adaptation or ordinary feedback is too weak, delayed, or misaligned to restore balance.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "An excessive response could produce the opposite imbalance.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored trigger_conditions, structural_problem fields; the source file was not modified. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: An excessive response could produce the opposite imbalance. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["An excessive response could produce the opposite imbalance.", "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored trigger_conditions, structural_problem fields; the source file was not modified."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "An excessive response could produce the opposite imbalance."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"candidate_ledger_sha256": "96f72d2139077fd57bf795048ebef33b3fd574b20963170080ec916b5b3b92fe", "extension_id": "new-archetypes-extension-001", "ledger_id": "prime-production-v1.2-extension-001", "ledger_sha256": "9644520614744632d1d36da44b1acd77ce432852c6083eb871203521c166efce"}, "base_projection_sha256": "841e0c7f3cb8e8054475ad29a8a14745a416b4fc115559a44878b94292e673ec", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "ca09ed9fe1598ce7072755b530de5553f5ee0a7cd64ae82d9e4a4e2149a37788", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Equity Adjustment", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:equity_adjustment", "slug": "equity_adjustment"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is false sameness. A system treats participants as if they face the same conditions, even though some face additional costs, constraints, histories, exposure, access gaps, or capability mismatches. The result can look equal on paper while remaining unequal in practice.\n\nThis problem often hides in incidental features of rules: a deadline, a single communication channel, a fixed schedule, a proof requirement, a language assumption, a digital interface, a location, a testing format, or a resource allocation formula. These features may not be essential to the standard, but they can decide who can realistically meet it.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system applies formally equal rules, resources, pathways, or procedures to participants who face materially different starting conditions, constraints, needs, or barriers, thereby preserving unequal access, burden, or outcome opportunity."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record starts with a prior general rule and a materially different case where applying it unchanged would be unjust or defeat its purpose.", "role_mapping": "Uniform treatment -> standard rule; unequal access -> case-specific injustice.", "slug": "equity", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b026_a03_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when a formally equal rule, resource allocation, process, interface, or requirement creates unequal practical access or burden. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Uniform treatment produces unequal practical access.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Uniform treatment produces unequal practical access", "Use this archetype when a formally equal rule, resource allocation, process, interface, or requirement creates unequal practical access or burden."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Equity", "one_liner": "Context-sensitive fairness.", "page_ref": "prime:equity", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Uniform treatment -> standard rule; unequal access -> case-specific injustice.", "slug": "equity", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record starts with a prior general rule and a materially different case where applying it unchanged would be unjust or defeat its purpose."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Uniform treatment produces unequal practical access.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Equity preserves the governing principle while tailoring a remedial path to materially relevant particular facts.", "role_mapping": "Legitimate standard -> prior rule; unequal path -> particularity requiring remedy.", "slug": "equity", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b026_a03_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when a system wants to preserve a shared standard but recognizes that the default pathway is not equally reachable. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A shared standard is legitimate but the path to it is not equally reachable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A shared standard is legitimate but the path to it is not equally reachable", "It is especially useful when a system wants to preserve a shared standard but recognizes that the default pathway is not equally reachable."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Equity", "one_liner": "Context-sensitive fairness.", "page_ref": "prime:equity", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Legitimate standard -> prior rule; unequal path -> particularity requiring remedy.", "slug": "equity", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Equity preserves the governing principle while tailoring a remedial path to materially relevant particular facts."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A shared standard is legitimate but the path to it is not equally reachable.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P041-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"], ["O1", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve actual existing discretion rather than only a proposal to create it.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A discretionary practice or authority currently exists.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve lack of visibility into the discretionary practice or its application.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The discretion is invisible or opaque to affected participants or reviewers.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve inconsistent exercise rather than transparent, principled variation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The discretion is applied inconsistently across comparable cases.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Existing discretion is invisible or inconsistent.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Existing discretion is either opaque or applied inconsistently.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P041-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Valid equity requires transparent, principled, reviewable discretion rather than invisible inconsistency.", "slug": "equity"}], "residual_id": "r:equity_adjustment:b026_a03_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b026_a03_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Existing discretion is invisible or inconsistent. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Existing discretion is invisible or inconsistent"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A principled exception would be consistent and is expressly excluded by the candidate; every genuine special-pleading instance retains the unprincipled asymmetry.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Special Pleading", "one_liner": "The fallacy of exempting a favored case from a general standard the arguer just invoked, without a principled basis — a consistency violation under self-serving direction, exposed by asking whether the arguer would grant the same exception to an opponent.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:special_pleading", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "special_pleading"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "special_pleading", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P041-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "The O1-plus-O3 DNF branch is fully entailed even though the alternative opacity branch is not; the candidate is therefore directly necessary for this branch."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Existing discretion is invisible or inconsistent.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P041-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a participation-governing rule rather than an unrelated constraint.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A focal rule governs access to or conditions of participation.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve rigidity rather than a flexible rule applied correctly.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The rule is rigid and does not accommodate relevant differences or exceptions.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve legitimacy of the participation rather than exclusion of invalid or prohibited conduct.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The barred participation would otherwise be legitimate.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the directed blocking effect of the rigid rule.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The rule's rigidity prevents that legitimate participation.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Rigid rules block legitimate participation.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A rigid rule prevents otherwise legitimate participation.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P041-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Equity can modify a monetary remedy, deadline, or obligation without any participation boundary.", "slug": "equity"}], "residual_id": "r:equity_adjustment:b026_a03_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b026_a03_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Rule rigidity blocks legitimate participation. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Rule rigidity blocks legitimate participation"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Equity can modify a monetary remedy, deadline, or obligation without any participation boundary.", "slug": "equity"}], "normalized_requirement": "Rigid rules block legitimate participation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Rigid rules block legitimate participation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Aggregate outcomes reveal recurring gaps.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Common triggers include recurring accommodation requests, uneven completion rates, informal workarounds, unexplained access gaps, policies that work well for default users but poorly for others, and processes where participants must over-advocate or over-disclose to receive fair treatment. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Aggregate outcomes reveal recurring gaps. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Aggregate outcomes reveal recurring gaps", "Common triggers include recurring accommodation requests, uneven completion rates, informal workarounds, unexplained access gaps, policies that work well for default users but poorly for others, and processes where participants must over-advocate or over-disclose to receive fair treatment."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Aggregate outcomes reveal recurring gaps"}, {"display_text": "Prior attempts at equality are not enough.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Prior attempts at equality are not enough. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Prior attempts at equality are not enough"]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Prior attempts at equality are not enough"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 26, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-026", "ledger_sha256": "847cddc1fda93cf1363663c6851e2a324cbe76f36d2c8bb092003b940b38f6c1"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": [{"groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_SYNTHESIS", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A single skewed dataset can preserve the complete class-imbalance mechanism while lacking recurrence; the guard defeats that counterexample by requiring the same performance gap in two independent evaluation slices.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Class Imbalance", "one_liner": "Diagnose why a 99%-accurate classifier can be useless: when one class vastly outnumbers the class of interest, additive loss aggregation lets majority examples dominate the gradient, so the model learns to ignore the rare minority.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:class_imbalance", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O4"], "guard_type": "TIMING_BINDING", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "minority_recall_gap_recurs_across_evaluations", "predicate": "The candidate's minority-recall gap relative to majority-class performance recurs in at least two independently evaluated dataset slices.", "rationale": "The exact candidate supplies the principal spine and the single anchored guard fills only the identified contingent gap without laundering the unit head."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "class_imbalance"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "minority_recall_gap_recurs_across_evaluations"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "class_imbalance", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P041-C10-U1", "why_it_fits": "Class imbalance supplies the aggregate class-performance spine, but the readers' prevalence-ratio guard tracked the wrong outcome. The synthesized guard binds recurrence to the existing minority-performance gap itself."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "I attempted to preserve the complete exact DSA while falsifying the selected DNF branch; the candidate's constitutive roles and relations prevented such a counterexample.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Funnel Plot Asymmetry", "one_liner": "Plot each study's effect against its precision and read a departure from the symmetric inverted-funnel expected under unbiased sampling — a gap where small null studies should be — as the visual fingerprint of a publication filter, licensing scrutiny against a fixed set of causes rather than a verdict.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:funnel_plot_asymmetry", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "funnel_plot_asymmetry"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "funnel_plot_asymmetry", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P041-C10-U1", "why_it_fits": "A valid funnel asymmetry necessarily consists of multiple aggregate study outcomes revealing a systematic gap relative to the expected symmetric baseline."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Two cohorts can exhibit one stable measured contrast in a single study and fully instantiate a cohort effect, while failing the unit's explicit recurrence requirement.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Cohort Effect", "one_liner": "An observed outcome difference associated with membership in groups defined by a shared birth or entry interval, kept distinct from aging, period shocks, and any unproven causal account of the cohort contrast.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:cohort_effect", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O4"], "guard_type": "TIMING_BINDING", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "recurring_cohort_group_gap", "predicate": "The same group gap recurs across multiple relevant cohort comparisons or repeated aggregate observations.", "rationale": "The exact candidate supplies the principal spine and the single anchored guard fills only the identified contingent gap without laundering the unit head."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "cohort_effect"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "recurring_cohort_group_gap"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "cohort_effect", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P041-C10-U1", "why_it_fits": "The candidate directly supplies aggregate outcomes, cohort groups, and the gap relation. One atomic timing guard restricts that existing relation to cases where the group gap recurs."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A lone small study with a larger estimate would not instantiate small-study effects; the exact record requires a systematic pattern across the pooled study body.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Small-Study Effects", "one_liner": "The meta-analytic pattern in which smaller studies report systematically larger effects than larger ones, producing funnel-plot asymmetry that inflates the pooled estimate — a shared symptom of several biases, not a diagnosis of any one cause.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:small_study_effects", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "small_study_effects"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "small_study_effects", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P041-C10-U1", "why_it_fits": "The candidate necessarily contains aggregate evidence, two size-defined groups, the outcome gap, and recurrence across repeated study aggregates, so it directly grounds the supporting unit."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Without the qualifier, a complete candidate instance can lack recurrence; with the single candidate-anchored recurrence fact, that counterexample is excluded.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Outbreak Underascertainment", "one_liner": "The surveillance failure in which recorded case counts fall systematically below the true count because a multi-stage detection pipeline — symptom expression, care-seeking, testing, confirmation, reporting — filters cases with biased attenuation at each layer.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:outbreak_underascertainment", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O4"], "guard_type": "TIMING_BINDING", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "undercount_gap_recurs_across_aggregates", "predicate": "The candidate's ascertainment multiplier exceeds one in at least two reporting intervals or aggregate population slices.", "rationale": "The exact candidate supplies the principal spine and the single anchored guard fills only the identified contingent gap without laundering the unit head."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "outbreak_underascertainment"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "undercount_gap_recurs_across_aggregates"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "outbreak_underascertainment", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P041-C10-U1", "why_it_fits": "Outbreak underascertainment supplies the observed-versus-true aggregate gap; one atomic repeat-observation restriction supplies recurrence."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "I attempted to preserve the complete exact DSA while falsifying the selected DNF branch; the candidate's constitutive roles and relations prevented such a counterexample.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Annotation Drift", "one_liner": "The gradual, undocumented shift over time in how annotators apply an unchanged rubric, so identical instances get different labels — a silent recalibration of a measurement instrument, invisible to within-slice agreement and detectable only by re-annotating frozen gold.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:annotation_drift", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "annotation_drift"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "annotation_drift", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P041-C10-U1", "why_it_fits": "Annotation drift is explicitly time-varying and cohort-level, requiring repeated aggregate differences for identical instances under an unchanged rubric."}], "publication_role": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT_ONLY", "source_residual_occurrence_id": "r:equity_adjustment:b026_a03_c4", "unit": {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P041-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve aggregate outcome evidence rather than one isolated anecdote.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Outcome observations are aggregated over participants or cases.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a group-defined comparison capable of exhibiting a gap.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "At least two relevant groups, or one group and a relevant comparison baseline, are distinguished.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the evidentiary relation from outcomes to the group disparity.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The aggregate outcomes reveal a gap between the compared groups or baseline.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve recurrence rather than a single transient aggregate difference.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The group gap recurs across relevant periods, cohorts, or repeated aggregates.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "Aggregate outcomes reveal recurring group gaps.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Aggregate outcomes repeatedly reveal gaps between relevant groups.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P041-C10-U1"}}]}
{"archetype": {"name": "Equivalence Class Consolidation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:equivalence_class_consolidation", "slug": "equivalence_class_consolidation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 5 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is variant sprawl without governed same-treatment. Multiple items differ in surface form, location, name, identifier, source, format, or history, but share the relevant structure or function for a current purpose. Because this equivalence is not encoded, the system duplicates work, produces inconsistent decisions, loses history, double-counts, or treats aliases as separate realities.\n\nThe root tension is between compression and fidelity. Consolidation compresses many variants into one class, but the compression is only valid if it does not erase differences that matter.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Multiple items differ superficially but are equivalent for the purpose at hand, causing duplication, inconsistent treatment, fragmented records, avoidable complexity, repeated work, or contradictory decisions."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P041-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require at least two variants rather than one representation.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Multiple variants are present.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve superficial difference among the variants.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The variants differ in surface form or representation.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve purpose-relative equivalence rather than mere similarity.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The variants are equivalent for the focal purpose.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve problematic proliferation rather than a small controlled set of variants.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The equivalent variants have proliferated enough to constitute sprawl.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}], "predicate": "Equivalent variants have proliferated into sprawl.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Superficially different but purpose-equivalent variants have proliferated into sprawl.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P041-C13-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A canonical-form domain can contain few objects and no problematic variant sprawl.", "slug": "canonical_form"}], "residual_id": "r:equivalence_class_consolidation:b026_a04_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b026_a04_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Variant sprawl. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["variant_sprawl"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A canonical-form domain can contain few objects and no problematic variant sprawl.", "slug": "canonical_form"}], "normalized_requirement": "Equivalent variants have proliferated into sprawl.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Equivalent variants have proliferated into sprawl.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P041-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve plural items capable of redundant processing.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "At least two items are present.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve purpose-relative equivalence rather than superficial resemblance alone.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The items are equivalent for the focal purpose.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve non-recognition of equivalence during processing.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The processing system treats the equivalent items as distinct rather than consolidating them.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve duplicate or repeated processing rather than one consolidated operation.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Processing is repeated separately across the equivalent items.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}], "predicate": "Equivalent items are processed repeatedly as distinct.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Purpose-equivalent items are repeatedly processed as if distinct.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P041-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A canonical reduction can already deduplicate every equivalent object before processing.", "slug": "canonical_form"}], "residual_id": "r:equivalence_class_consolidation:b026_a04_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b026_a04_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Duplicate processing. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["duplicate_processing"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A canonical reduction can already deduplicate every equivalent object before processing.", "slug": "canonical_form"}], "normalized_requirement": "Equivalent items are processed repeatedly as distinct.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Equivalent items are processed repeatedly as distinct.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P041-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve plural items whose treatments can be compared.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "At least two items are present.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve purpose-relative equivalence rather than generic similarity.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The items are equivalent for the focal purpose.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve treatment of the compared items rather than mere storage or representation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Each equivalent item receives a treatment, classification, or decision.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve unwarranted treatment difference across the equivalent items.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The treatments of the purpose-equivalent items are inconsistent.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Equivalent items receive inconsistent treatment.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Purpose-equivalent items receive inconsistent treatment.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P041-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Canonical representatives can yield perfectly consistent treatment.", "slug": "canonical_form"}], "residual_id": "r:equivalence_class_consolidation:b026_a04_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b026_a04_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Inconsistent treatment. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["inconsistent_treatment"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "If the cases were relevantly different under an independently grounded exception, the exact record classifies that as a principled exception rather than special pleading.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Special Pleading", "one_liner": "The fallacy of exempting a favored case from a general standard the arguer just invoked, without a principled basis — a consistency violation under self-serving direction, exposed by asking whether the arguer would grant the same exception to an opponent.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:special_pleading", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "special_pleading"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "special_pleading", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P041-C15-U1", "why_it_fits": "All four obligations are constitutive of special pleading's invoked-rule and asymmetric-exemption structure, so the DSA directly grounds the unit."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Equivalent items receive inconsistent treatment.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P042-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve one focal entity rather than conflate several entities.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Exactly one focal entity supplies the identity or history being tracked.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail multiple records, not fragmentation inside a single record.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The focal material is distributed across more than one record.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail purpose-relative equivalence among the records despite their separation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The records are equivalent for the relevant identification purpose.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfying this branch must make identity, not merely associated data, the fragmented object.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "In one branch, the entity's identity is fragmented across the records.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfying this branch must make the entity's history the fragmented object.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "In the alternative branch, the entity's history is fragmented across the records.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "One entity's identity or its history is fragmented across multiple records that are equivalent for the relevant purpose.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Equivalent records fragment one entity's identity or history.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P042-C01-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A content identity can remain unified and well-tracked across multiple carriers.", "slug": "abstract_work"}], "residual_id": "r:equivalence_class_consolidation:b026_a04_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b026_a04_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Fragmented identity or history. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["fragmented_identity_or_history"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A content identity can remain unified and well-tracked across multiple carriers.", "slug": "abstract_work"}], "normalized_requirement": "One entity's identity or history is fragmented across equivalent records.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "One entity's identity or history is fragmented across equivalent records.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P042-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must contain a real purpose-relative equivalence to be obscured.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Two or more items or records are equivalent for the relevant purpose.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail semantic drift rather than a static semantic difference.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The represented semantics change over time.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must make the semantic change causally responsible for obscuring equivalence.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The semantic drift makes the equivalence difficult to recognize.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve underlying equivalence rather than describe items that have ceased to be equivalent.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The equivalence remains present even though it is obscured.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Semantic drift in representations of equivalent items obscures their equivalence.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Semantic drift obscures equivalence among purpose-equivalent items.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P042-C02-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P042-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must contain a real purpose-relative equivalence to be obscured.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Two or more items or records are equivalent for the relevant purpose.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail naming drift rather than a stable naming difference.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The names or labels used for the items change or diverge over time.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must make label change causally responsible for obscuring equivalence.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The naming drift makes the equivalence difficult to recognize.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve underlying equivalence rather than infer non-equivalence from different names.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The equivalence remains present even though it is obscured.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Naming drift among representations of equivalent items obscures their equivalence.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Naming drift obscures equivalence among purpose-equivalent items.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P042-C02-U2"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Two naming systems can remain stable and explicitly reconciled with no drift.", "slug": "record_reconciliation"}], "residual_id": "r:equivalence_class_consolidation:b026_a04_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b026_a04_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Semantic or naming drift. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["semantic_or_naming_drift"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 2, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 2}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Two naming systems can remain stable and explicitly reconciled with no drift.", "slug": "record_reconciliation"}], "normalized_requirement": "Semantic or naming drift obscures equivalence.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 2 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Semantic or naming drift obscures equivalence.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Canonicalization pressure.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source states: Canonicalization pressure. The normalized goal is: Canonicalization pressure. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["canonicalization_pressure"]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "canonicalization_pressure"}, {"display_text": "Substitutability need.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source states: Substitutability need. The normalized goal is: Substitutability need. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["substitutability_need"]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "substitutability_need"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 26, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-026", "ledger_sha256": "847cddc1fda93cf1363663c6851e2a324cbe76f36d2c8bb092003b940b38f6c1"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Equivalence Normalization", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:equivalence_normalization", "slug": "equivalence_normalization"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is fragmentation by representation. A system sees many surface forms and treats them as separate even when they should be the same for the relevant purpose. The result can be duplicate records, missed search results, inconsistent eligibility decisions, broken joins, conflicting reports, duplicate payments, mismatched histories, or unsafe comparisons.\n\nThe hard part is that surface variation is not always noise. Local terms, source systems, historical codes, cultural names, legal labels, and measurement units may carry information that matters in some contexts. Equivalence Normalization therefore has to avoid two opposite errors: false splits, where equivalent variants remain separate, and false merges, where meaningful differences are erased.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system encounters multiple forms, names, units, records, paths, schemas, or cases that are equivalent for the relevant purpose but are treated inconsistently because their surface representations differ."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P042-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail multiple inputs rather than one input with several properties.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "At least two inputs are present.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve surface difference among the inputs.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The inputs differ in their surface representations.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must contain a single common referent or target for the inputs.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "There is one shared entity, concept, measure, case, or action target.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail co-reference or common targeting, not merely similarity between inputs.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Each input refers to that same referent or target.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Two or more surface-different inputs refer to one and the same entity, concept, measure, case, or action target.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Multiple surface-different inputs share one referent or action target.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P042-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A canonical-form domain may contain singleton equivalence classes and does not require two inputs to share one referent.", "slug": "canonical_form"}], "residual_id": "r:equivalence_normalization:b026_a05_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b026_a05_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Different inputs refer to the same entity, concept, measure, case, or action target. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Different inputs refer to the same entity, concept, measure, case, or action target."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A variant that routed to a distinct concept would violate the exact record's equivalence-class and backward-search guarantees, so it is not a complete instance.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Preferred Term", "one_liner": "The single authorized form a stewarding body designates as the canonical label for a concept in a controlled vocabulary — with every synonym, abbreviation, and variant retained as a non-preferred entry that routes to it, so new indexing must use one form and any variant a searcher enters reaches the same record.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:preferred_term", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "preferred_term"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "preferred_term", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P042-C03-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every preferred-term instance defines multiple variant forms and routes each to the same governed concept record."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A namesake that denotes another entity is disambiguated into another authorized string; it cannot preserve the candidate while falsifying the shared-referent obligation.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Authorized access point", "one_liner": "Assign each entity one rule-built, human-readable string that serves at once as heading, retrieval key, and cross-reference anchor — with a disambiguating qualifier carried in the string so two namesakes never collapse into one index entry.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:authorized_access_point", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "authorized_access_point"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "authorized_access_point", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P042-C03-U1", "why_it_fits": "The cross-reference-anchor function constitutively routes former names, alternate spellings, and translations to the same entity rather than rival headings."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A string referring to another concept is explicitly excluded from the alias set, so a complete alias-label instance cannot preserve different referents.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Alternative label", "one_liner": "Admit non-preferred surface forms that resolve silently to a concept's one canonical label — widening the search surface so any variant finds the concept, while the preferred form alone governs every display and authoritative output.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:alias_label", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "alias_label"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "alias_label", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P042-C03-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every admitted alias is definitionally a non-preferred surface form bound to the same concept and silently resolved to its canonical record."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Different inputs refer to the same entity, concept, measure, case, or action target.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires two naming systems with different identifiers, granularity, and disambiguation rules over overlapping referents.", "role_mapping": "Local forms -> naming systems; variation -> distinct identifiers and granularity.", "slug": "record_reconciliation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b026_a05_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Local naming, formatting, units, or schemas vary across departments, tools, jurisdictions, languages, sources, or time periods. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Local naming, formatting, units, or schemas vary across departments, tools, jurisdictions, languages, sources, or time periods."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Record Reconciliation", "one_liner": "Matching records across two naming systems and declaring, for each pair, a typed sameness verdict with explicit conditions of preservation and loss.", "page_ref": "prime:record_reconciliation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Local forms -> naming systems; variation -> distinct identifiers and granularity.", "slug": "record_reconciliation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires two naming systems with different identifiers, granularity, and disambiguation rules over overlapping referents."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Naming, formatting, units, or schemas differ across systems, sources, places, languages, or periods.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P042-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail purpose-relative equivalence rather than ordinary difference.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The focal variants are equivalent for the relevant downstream purpose.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must contain a representational difference that is not the relevant substantive distinction.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The variants differ in surface representation.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail unequal handling rather than merely separate representation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The equivalent variants receive inconsistent downstream handling or outcomes.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve the stated causal direction from surface representation to downstream inconsistency.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The surface difference causes the inconsistent handling.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Surface-different variants that are equivalent for the relevant purpose receive inconsistent downstream handling because of those surface differences.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Surface differences cause inconsistent handling of purpose-equivalent variants.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P042-C04-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Comparison can expose a difference without any inconsistent downstream action.", "slug": "comparison"}], "residual_id": "r:equivalence_normalization:b026_a05_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b026_a05_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Surface differences cause inconsistent policy decisions, reporting counts, routing, payments, risk assessments, or user experiences. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Surface differences cause inconsistent policy decisions, reporting counts, routing, payments, risk assessments, or user experiences."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Comparison can expose a difference without any inconsistent downstream action.", "slug": "comparison"}], "normalized_requirement": "Surface differences cause inconsistent policy, counts, routing, payments, risk, or user experience.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Surface differences cause inconsistent policy, counts, routing, payments, risk, or user experience.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P042-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve an existing canonical target rather than its absence.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A canonical form already exists.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must contain the variant-to-canonical mapping relation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Variants are mapped or expected to map into the canonical form by rules.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail implicitness rather than merely complexity or incompleteness.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The mapping rules are not explicit.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "A canonical form exists, but the rules for mapping variants into it remain implicit.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Variant-to-canonical mapping rules exist only implicitly.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P042-C05-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P042-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve an existing canonical target rather than its absence.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A canonical form already exists.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must contain the variant-to-canonical mapping relation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Variants are mapped or expected to map into the canonical form by rules.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail loss of currency over time, not merely implicitness or disagreement.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The mapping rules are no longer current.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "A canonical form exists, but the rules for mapping variants into it are stale.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Variant-to-canonical mapping rules are out of date.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P042-C05-U2"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P042-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve an existing canonical target rather than its absence.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A canonical form already exists.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must contain the variant-to-canonical mapping relation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Variants are mapped or expected to map into the canonical form by rules.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail plural positions rather than one actor's uncertainty.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "At least two stakeholder positions on the mapping rules are present.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail active contestation of the rules.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The stakeholder positions conflict over the mapping rules.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "A canonical form exists, but the rules for mapping variants into it are contested.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Stakeholders contest variant-to-canonical mapping rules.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P042-C05-U3"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid canonical form requires a deterministic, well-defined, total reduction procedure rather than an implicit or contested mapping.", "slug": "canonical_form"}], "residual_id": "r:equivalence_normalization:b026_a05_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b026_a05_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A canonical form already exists but the rules for mapping variants into it are implicit, stale, or contested. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A canonical form already exists but the rules for mapping variants into it are implicit, stale, or contested."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 3, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 3}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid canonical form requires a deterministic, well-defined, total reduction procedure rather than an implicit or contested mapping.", "slug": "canonical_form"}], "normalized_requirement": "A canonical form exists but variant-mapping rules are implicit, stale, or contested.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 3 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A canonical form exists but variant-mapping rules are implicit, stale, or contested.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Equivalent records or forms must be compared, joined, deduplicated, aggregated, searched, or governed.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system encounters multiple forms, names, units, records, paths, schemas, or cases that are equivalent for the relevant purpose but are treated inconsistently because their surface representations differ. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: Equivalent records or forms must be compared, joined, deduplicated, aggregated, searched, or governed. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Equivalent records or forms must be compared, joined, deduplicated, aggregated, searched, or governed.", "A system encounters multiple forms, names, units, records, paths, schemas, or cases that are equivalent for the relevant purpose but are treated inconsistently because their surface representations differ."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "Equivalent records or forms must be compared, joined, deduplicated, aggregated, searched, or governed."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 26, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-026", "ledger_sha256": "847cddc1fda93cf1363663c6851e2a324cbe76f36d2c8bb092003b940b38f6c1"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Equivalence-Preserving Rewrite Optimization", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:equivalence_preserving_rewrite_optimization", "slug": "equivalence_preserving_rewrite_optimization"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system needs to change form without changing meaning, behavior, obligation, result set, or externally visible contract. Teams often optimize, simplify, refactor, normalize, or translate before specifying what must remain equivalent. This creates hidden semantic drift, broken compatibility, lost side effects, invalid proofs, misleading performance gains, or untraceable differences between old and new forms.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system needs to change form without changing meaning, behavior, obligation, result set, or externally visible contract. Teams often optimize, simplify, refactor, normalize, or translate before specifying what must remain equivalent. This creates hidden semantic drift, broken compatibility, lost side effects, invalid proofs, misleading performance gains, or untraceable differences between old and new forms."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires an equivalence relation defining an admissible space of behaviorally equivalent forms.", "role_mapping": "Artifact -> object; possible forms -> rewrite space.", "slug": "equivalence_preserving_rewriting", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b026_a06_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: An artifact, expression, program, plan, rule, model, workflow, schema, or representation has multiple possible equivalent forms. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["An artifact, expression, program, plan, rule, model, workflow, schema, or representation has multiple possible equivalent forms."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Equivalence-Preserving Rewriting", "one_liner": "Transforming an object into a behaviourally equivalent but operationally different form under an explicit equivalence relation, then selecting among rewrites by an orthogonal cost criterion.", "page_ref": "prime:equivalence_preserving_rewriting", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Artifact -> object; possible forms -> rewrite space.", "slug": "equivalence_preserving_rewriting", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires an equivalence relation defining an admissible space of behaviorally equivalent forms."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "An artifact or representation has multiple equivalent forms.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "An orthogonal cost criterion ranks safe rewrites by speed, cost, clarity, or another operational property.", "role_mapping": "Current form -> higher-cost member; improvement -> lower-cost equivalent.", "slug": "equivalence_preserving_rewriting", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b026_a06_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The current form is costly, slow, brittle, opaque, hard to verify, hard to maintain, or poorly suited to an execution environment. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The current form is costly, slow, brittle, opaque, hard to verify, hard to maintain, or poorly suited to an execution environment."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Equivalence-Preserving Rewriting", "one_liner": "Transforming an object into a behaviourally equivalent but operationally different form under an explicit equivalence relation, then selecting among rewrites by an orthogonal cost criterion.", "page_ref": "prime:equivalence_preserving_rewriting", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Current form -> higher-cost member; improvement -> lower-cost equivalent.", "slug": "equivalence_preserving_rewriting", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "An orthogonal cost criterion ranks safe rewrites by speed, cost, clarity, or another operational property."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The current form is costlier, slower, more brittle, opaque, unverifiable, or ill-suited than an available equivalent form.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Orthogonality between the safe-move equivalence relation and the within-class cost criterion is mandatory.", "role_mapping": "Equivalence criterion -> admissible space; improvement criterion -> selection within it.", "slug": "equivalence_preserving_rewriting", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b026_a06_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The improvement criterion is not the same as the equivalence criterion, such as optimizing speed while preserving result semantics. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The improvement criterion is not the same as the equivalence criterion, such as optimizing speed while preserving result semantics."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Equivalence-Preserving Rewriting", "one_liner": "Transforming an object into a behaviourally equivalent but operationally different form under an explicit equivalence relation, then selecting among rewrites by an orthogonal cost criterion.", "page_ref": "prime:equivalence_preserving_rewriting", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Equivalence criterion -> admissible space; improvement criterion -> selection within it.", "slug": "equivalence_preserving_rewriting", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Orthogonality between the safe-move equivalence relation and the within-class cost criterion is mandatory."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The improvement criterion differs from the equivalence criterion.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P042-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must concern a rewrite or transformation, not a static artifact.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A rewrite changes the form of a focal artifact or representation.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must contain an invariance requirement that defines rewrite safety.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The rewrite is expected to preserve a relevant meaning, behavior, obligation, result, or external contract.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must include available certification evidence as a class.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Existing evidence or assurance mechanisms bear on whether the invariance is preserved.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail insufficiency rather than successful certification.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The existing evidence is insufficient for certification.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve uncertainty and must not require that the rewrite has actually broken equivalence.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Whether the rewrite is safe remains undetermined.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve the current not-yet timing rather than permanent impossibility.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "Certification is not yet possible at the current stage.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "Existing equivalence evidence is insufficient to determine whether a form-changing rewrite preserves what must remain invariant.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Available evidence cannot yet certify an equivalence-preserving rewrite.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P042-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid instance requires an explicit equivalence relation and proof or test that the rewrite stays inside it.", "slug": "equivalence_preserving_rewriting"}], "residual_id": "r:equivalence_preserving_rewrite_optimization:b026_a06_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b026_a06_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Existing tests, contracts, proofs, benchmarks, or compatibility expectations are insufficient to tell whether the rewrite is safe. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Existing tests, contracts, proofs, benchmarks, or compatibility expectations are insufficient to tell whether the rewrite is safe."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid instance requires an explicit equivalence relation and proof or test that the rewrite stays inside it.", "slug": "equivalence_preserving_rewriting"}], "normalized_requirement": "Tests, contracts, proofs, benchmarks, or compatibility expectations cannot yet certify the rewrite.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Tests, contracts, proofs, benchmarks, or compatibility expectations cannot yet certify the rewrite.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Stakeholders want improvement without changing the promised behavior, interpretation, result, obligation, or interface.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system needs to change form without changing meaning, behavior, obligation, result set, or externally visible contract. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: Stakeholders want improvement without changing the promised behavior, interpretation, result, obligation, or interface. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders want improvement without changing the promised behavior, interpretation, result, obligation, or interface.", "A system needs to change form without changing meaning, behavior, obligation, result set, or externally visible contract."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Stakeholders want improvement without changing the promised behavior, interpretation, result, obligation, or interface."}, {"display_text": "Several rewrite rules, transformations, refactorings, simplifications, or plan choices could apply.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: Several rewrite rules, transformations, refactorings, simplifications, or plan choices could apply. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Several rewrite rules, transformations, refactorings, simplifications, or plan choices could apply."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Several rewrite rules, transformations, refactorings, simplifications, or plan choices could apply."}, {"display_text": "The rewrite may affect hidden observables such as ordering, latency, logging, audit traces, failure modes, permissions, or side effects.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This creates hidden semantic drift, broken compatibility, lost side effects, invalid proofs, misleading performance gains, or untraceable differences between old and new forms. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: The rewrite may affect hidden observables such as ordering, latency, logging, audit traces, failure modes, permissions, or side effects. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The rewrite may affect hidden observables such as ordering, latency, logging, audit traces, failure modes, permissions, or side effects.", "This creates hidden semantic drift, broken compatibility, lost side effects, invalid proofs, misleading performance gains, or untraceable differences between old and new forms."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "The rewrite may affect hidden observables such as ordering, latency, logging, audit traces, failure modes, permissions, or side effects."}, {"display_text": "A later reviewer must know why the new form is considered equivalent and why it was selected.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: A later reviewer must know why the new form is considered equivalent and why it was selected. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A later reviewer must know why the new form is considered equivalent and why it was selected."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 8, "text": "A later reviewer must know why the new form is considered equivalent and why it was selected."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 26, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-026", "ledger_sha256": "847cddc1fda93cf1363663c6851e2a324cbe76f36d2c8bb092003b940b38f6c1"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Equivalence-Relation Refinement and Coarsening", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:equivalence_relation_refinement_and_coarsening", "slug": "equivalence_relation_refinement_and_coarsening"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 4, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 2, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 2, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 2 of 4 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system relies on equivalence classes, but the current relation no longer matches the decisions it supports. If classes are too coarse, important differences are erased; if too fine, the system accumulates unnecessary complexity, duplicated treatment, and coordination burden. Changing the relation without explicit rules can break history, fairness, metrics, permissions, or interpretation.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system relies on equivalence classes, but the current relation no longer matches the decisions it supports. If classes are too coarse, important differences are erased; if too fine, the system accumulates unnecessary complexity, duplicated treatment, and coordination burden. Changing the relation without explicit rules can break history, fairness, metrics, permissions, or interpretation."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P042-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must compare multiple members within one class.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "At least two members belong to the same equivalence class.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail a real within-class difference rather than mere plurality.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The within-class members differ from one another.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must locate the difference on a dimension relevant to how the class is used.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The difference concerns a decision-relevant dimension such as behavior, risk, needs, outcomes, or treatment.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve materiality rather than any negligible variation.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The difference is material enough to affect the supported decision or treatment.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}], "predicate": "Members assigned to one equivalence class differ materially on a dimension relevant to behavior, risk, needs, outcomes, or treatment.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "One equivalence class erases material differences among its members.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P042-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Fungible units are substitutable without loss and therefore do not require material within-class differences.", "slug": "fungibility"}], "residual_id": "r:equivalence_relation_refinement_and_coarsening:b026_a07_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b026_a07_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Members inside one equivalence class show materially different behavior, risk, needs, outcomes, or treatment requirements. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Members inside one equivalence class show materially different behavior, risk, needs, outcomes, or treatment requirements."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_SYNTHESIS", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A comparison that notes a genuine shared feature without treating the items interchangeably does not satisfy the bridge; with operative equal treatment, the class assignment and every remaining obligation follow.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_BRIDGE", "name": "False Equivalence", "one_liner": "The fallacy of treating two things as comparably weighted on the dimension a judgment turns on, when they in fact differ by an order of magnitude or by kind — by highlighting a genuine shared feature and suppressing the difference that actually controls.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:false_equivalence", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "RELATION_SUBSUMPTION", "kind": "INTERPRETIVE_BRIDGE", "normalized_key": "decision_equivalence_instantiates_operative_class", "predicate": "Items treated as interchangeable or equally weighted for a decision instantiate one operative equivalence class for that decision.", "rationale": "The retained guarded expression preserves all principal roles and the relation family; one atomic anchored qualifier fills exactly the remaining branch gaps."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "false_equivalence"}, {"kind": "INTERPRETIVE_BRIDGE", "value": "decision_equivalence_instantiates_operative_class"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "false_equivalence", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P042-C07-U1", "why_it_fits": "The candidate supplies the materially different items and harmful sameness treatment; one general relation bridge makes that treatment explicit as operative equivalence-class membership."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Members of one equivalence class differ materially in behavior, risk, needs, outcomes, or treatment.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P042-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must compare multiple classes rather than members inside one class.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "At least two distinct equivalence classes are present.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail sameness of treatment across the distinct classes.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The classes receive identical downstream treatment.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfying this branch must type the common downstream handling as an action.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "In one branch, the identical treatment is an action.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfying this branch must type the common downstream handling as an interpretation.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "In the alternative branch, the identical treatment is an interpretation.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Multiple distinct equivalence classes receive the same action or the same interpretation.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Distinct equivalence classes receive identical downstream treatment.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P042-C08-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P042-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must concern continued separation among multiple classes.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "At least two equivalence classes are maintained as separate.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must make separation responsible for the added cost.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Maintaining the class separation produces cost.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve the absence of offsetting benefit.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Maintaining the separation produces no benefit.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail the unfavorable cost-benefit comparison, not cost alone.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The cost is not offset by any benefit of keeping the classes distinct.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Maintaining the separation among multiple equivalence classes adds cost without producing benefit.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Class separation imposes cost with no offsetting benefit.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P042-C08-U2"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Canonical form reduces within a fixed relation and does not entail that multiple classes should be merged.", "slug": "canonical_form"}], "residual_id": "r:equivalence_relation_refinement_and_coarsening:b026_a07_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b026_a07_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Multiple classes receive the same action or interpretation and maintaining their separation adds cost without benefit. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Multiple classes receive the same action or interpretation and maintaining their separation adds cost without benefit."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 2, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 2}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Canonical form reduces within a fixed relation and does not entail that multiple classes should be merged.", "slug": "canonical_form"}], "normalized_requirement": "Multiple classes receive identical treatment while their separation adds cost without benefit.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 2 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Multiple classes receive identical treatment while their separation adds cost without benefit.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P042-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail plural positions capable of disagreeing.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "At least two stakeholders or stakeholder positions are present.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must relate the disputed positions to equivalence criteria.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Each stakeholder position applies a criterion for what counts as the same.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail criterion mismatch rather than shared criteria with different evidence.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The sameness criteria differ across the stakeholder positions.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve the criteria's non-explicit status.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The differing criteria are implicit rather than explicitly agreed and stated.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail disagreement rather than harmless diversity of criteria.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The stakeholders disagree.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve the source's causal direction from criterion mismatch to disagreement.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The differing implicit criteria cause the disagreement.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Stakeholders disagree because they apply different implicit criteria for what counts as equivalent.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Different implicit sameness criteria cause stakeholder disagreement.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P042-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "One explicit canonical relation can be shared without disagreement or implicit criteria.", "slug": "canonical_form"}], "residual_id": "r:equivalence_relation_refinement_and_coarsening:b026_a07_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b026_a07_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Stakeholders disagree because they are using different implicit criteria for what counts as the same. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders disagree because they are using different implicit criteria for what counts as the same."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "One explicit canonical relation can be shared without disagreement or implicit criteria.", "slug": "canonical_form"}], "normalized_requirement": "Stakeholders disagree because they use different implicit sameness criteria.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Stakeholders disagree because they use different implicit sameness criteria.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P042-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must concern a classification-like system whose resolution affects its operation.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A system classifies, distinguishes, permits, organizes taxonomically, or reports items at some granularity.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must contain an earlier assumption baseline.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The system was designed under original granularity assumptions.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail change over time rather than an original design error alone.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The system's scale, use, or demands have grown since those assumptions were set.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must compare current demands against the original granularity envelope.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Current scale or use exceeds what the original granularity assumptions fit.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail present mismatch, not growth that remains within the original design.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The original granularity no longer fits the system's current use.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "A classification-like system's current scale or use has outgrown the granularity assumptions on which it was originally designed.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Current system use exceeds its original granularity assumptions.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P042-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Classification can remain appropriately granular throughout its lifecycle.", "slug": "classification"}], "residual_id": "r:equivalence_relation_refinement_and_coarsening:b026_a07_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b026_a07_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A classification, permission, taxonomy, or reporting system has grown beyond its original granularity assumptions. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A classification, permission, taxonomy, or reporting system has grown beyond its original granularity assumptions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_SYNTHESIS", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A rule set that was already too coarse at first deployment preserves the DSA but fails the qualifier; once post-design choice-point growth is present, original assumptions and current exceedance necessarily follow.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Rules-of-Engagement Ambiguity", "one_liner": "Diagnose frontline breakdown under time pressure as a grain mismatch — decision rules written coarser than the environment generates choice points — paid out of a finite discretion budget, relocating the fix from the operator's judgment to the rule, escalation path, and pre-positioned authority.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:rules_of_engagement_ambiguity", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2", "O3"], "guard_type": "TIMING_BINDING", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "post_design_choice_point_grain_growth", "predicate": "The operating environment's choice-point grain increased after the focal rules were designed and had originally fit.", "rationale": "The retained guarded expression preserves all principal roles and the relation family; one atomic anchored qualifier fills exactly the remaining branch gaps."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "rules_of_engagement_ambiguity"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "post_design_choice_point_grain_growth"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "rules_of_engagement_ambiguity", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P042-C10-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record directly supplies the present rule/environment granularity mismatch; one atomic temporal qualifier supplies original fit and subsequent growth without restating the head."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A classification or permission system has outgrown its original granularity assumptions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Historical continuity matters because old and new class assignments must remain comparable or auditable.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this deployment constraint: Historical continuity matters because old and new class assignments must remain comparable or auditable. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Historical continuity matters because old and new class assignments must remain comparable or auditable."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Historical continuity matters because old and new class assignments must remain comparable or auditable."}, {"display_text": "Downstream decisions depend on class membership and would change if the equivalence relation were revised.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Relation change improves fit but threatens continuity and downstream stability. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Downstream decisions depend on class membership and would change if the equivalence relation were revised. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Downstream decisions depend on class membership and would change if the equivalence relation were revised.", "Relation change improves fit but threatens continuity and downstream stability."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Downstream decisions depend on class membership and would change if the equivalence relation were revised."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 26, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-026", "ledger_sha256": "847cddc1fda93cf1363663c6851e2a324cbe76f36d2c8bb092003b940b38f6c1"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": [{"groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A declaration with no relying consumer would lack the exact record's delegated-trust route; in a complete instance, revocation necessarily changes the substitutions and decisions that route permits.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Declared Equivalence Mapping", "one_liner": "An explicit, authoritative, versioned assertion that two concepts from different vocabularies are interchangeable for stated purposes — collapsing a cross-scheme distinction to zero for consumers who trust the declaration rather than re-verifying at use-time.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:declared_equivalence_mapping", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "declared_equivalence_mapping"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "declared_equivalence_mapping", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P042-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every exact instance makes consumers treat mapped concepts as one atom without re-verification and provides downgrade or revocation, so changing the governing mapping changes the permitted downstream decisions."}], "publication_role": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT_ONLY", "source_residual_occurrence_id": "r:equivalence_relation_refinement_and_coarsening:b026_a07_c6", "unit": {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P042-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must contain downstream decisions rather than only labels or representatives.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Downstream decisions are made using equivalence-class membership.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must make membership load-bearing for the decisions.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The downstream decisions depend on class membership.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must link membership to an equivalence relation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A governing equivalence relation determines the class membership.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve the if-revised modality rather than require a completed revision.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Revision of the equivalence relation is counterfactual or prospective.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve the causal counterfactual from relation revision to decision change.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Revising the relation would change the downstream decisions through changed class membership.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Downstream decisions depend on class membership and would change if the governing equivalence relation were revised.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Revising an equivalence relation would change membership-dependent decisions.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P042-C11-U1"}}]}
{"archetype": {"name": "Error Tradeoff Calibration", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:error_tradeoff_calibration", "slug": "error_tradeoff_calibration"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is that a system needs a crisp boundary for action under uncertainty, but the boundary chooses between two forms of wrongness. If the threshold is too sensitive, the system overreacts, wastes attention, restricts innocent cases, or creates alarm fatigue. If the threshold is too strict, the system underreacts, misses danger, delays support, or allows preventable harm.\n\nThe danger is not only bad accuracy. The deeper danger is hidden risk posture. A threshold may silently decide that false alarms are worse than missed cases, or that missed cases are worse than false alarms, without anyone explicitly endorsing that choice.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system uses an action, detection, or escalation threshold without explicitly considering the asymmetric costs of false positives and false negatives, so its decisions over-alarm, under-detect, over-punish, miss serious cases, or drift into an implicit risk posture no one actually endorsed."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires a noisy evidence variable and a freely chosen criterion partitioning it into signal-present and signal-absent decisions.", "role_mapping": "Score -> evidence variable; decision threshold -> criterion.", "slug": "signal_detection_theory", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b026_a08_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A continuous score, uncertain signal, test result, or evidence level must be converted into a binary, staged, or priority decision. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A continuous score, uncertain signal, test result, or evidence level must be converted into a binary, staged, or priority decision."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Signal Detection Theory", "one_liner": "Every decision under noise factorizes into a sensitivity that fixes the achievable error trade-off and a freely-chosen criterion that distributes errors along it.", "page_ref": "prime:signal_detection_theory", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Score -> evidence variable; decision threshold -> criterion.", "slug": "signal_detection_theory", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires a noisy evidence variable and a freely chosen criterion partitioning it into signal-present and signal-absent decisions."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A continuous noisy score or evidence level is thresholded into a discrete decision.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P042-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must include false positives rather than generic errors alone.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "False-positive errors are present as one side of the comparison.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must include false negatives rather than only false positives.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "False-negative errors are present as the other side of the comparison.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve the significance of both sides rather than dismiss one as negligible.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Both error types matter materially.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail harm from each error type.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Each error type causes harm to people, resources, rights, or operational capacities.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail differentiated harm incidence across the two error types.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The bearers or stakes harmed by false positives differ from those harmed by false negatives.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "False positives and false negatives both impose material harm, but the harmed people, resources, rights, or operational capacities differ between the two error types.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "The two decision-error types impose material harms on different bearers or stakes.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P042-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Its two error costs may be equal and borne by the same actor; distinct harmed roles are not mandatory.", "slug": "signal_detection_theory"}], "residual_id": "r:error_tradeoff_calibration:b026_a08_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b026_a08_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: False positives and false negatives both matter but harm different people, resources, rights, or operational capacities. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["False positives and false negatives both matter but harm different people, resources, rights, or operational capacities."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A noisy alarm stream with no desensitization or missed critical alarm is explicitly only nuisance firing, not the complete alarm-fatigue equilibrium.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Alarm Fatigue", "one_liner": "Reframe an operator's habitual silencing of clinical alarms as the rational response to a warning channel whose predictive value has collapsed, relocating the fix from the operator's discipline to the channel's specificity.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:alarm_fatigue", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "alarm_fatigue"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "alarm_fatigue", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P042-C12-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires both a high false-positive burden and critical events missed through the learned non-response, with material harms on the operator and patient sides."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "If repetitive prompts never trained dismissal of a consequential prompt, the circuit breaker would remain effective and the complete confirmation-fatigue failure would not be present.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Confirmation Fatigue", "one_liner": "The interaction-design failure where a blocking confirmation prompt fires so often, and so rarely marks a truly consequential choice, that users develop an automatic dismiss reflex that discharges the prompt without reading it — leaving it syntactically present but informationally inert.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:confirmation_fatigue", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "confirmation_fatigue"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "confirmation_fatigue", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P042-C12-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record couples repeated low-PPV prompt errors to identical dismissal of the rare load-bearing prompt, so both error directions and their distinct stakes are necessary."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "False positives and false negatives harm different people, resources, rights, or capacities.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P042-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must concern an operative decision threshold.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A current action, detection, or escalation threshold exists.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail inheritance, not merely persistence or similarity.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The current threshold is inherited from a prior decision source or authority.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve the prior-to-current provenance direction.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The source of the threshold precedes its current use.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "The system's existing decision threshold is inherited from a prior choice or authority.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An existing decision threshold is inherited.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P042-C13-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P042-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must concern an operative decision threshold.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A current action, detection, or escalation threshold exists.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must make convention the reason for the threshold's value.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Established convention supplies the basis for the threshold.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "The system's existing decision threshold is set by convention.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Convention supplies the basis for an existing decision threshold.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P042-C13-U2"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P042-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must concern an operative decision threshold.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A current action, detection, or escalation threshold exists.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must contain two contexts rather than reuse within one unchanged context.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A source context and a distinct receiving context are present.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve cross-context transfer of the threshold.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The threshold used in the receiving context is copied from the source context.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail contextual difference, not merely two names for one setting.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The source and receiving contexts are different.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "The system's existing decision threshold is copied from another context.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A threshold is transferred from a different context into current use.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P042-C13-U3"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P042-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must concern an operative decision threshold.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A current action, detection, or escalation threshold exists.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail an optimization relation rather than inheritance or convention.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The threshold is selected through optimization.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must make accuracy, not a different metric, the objective.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Accuracy is the optimization objective.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve the exclusive force of only.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "No non-accuracy objective or error cost enters the optimization.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "The system's existing decision threshold is optimized only for accuracy.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Accuracy alone determines an existing decision threshold.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P042-C13-U4"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Naming the two error types does not entail an inherited or accuracy-only threshold.", "slug": "type_i_type_ii_errors"}], "residual_id": "r:error_tradeoff_calibration:b026_a08_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b026_a08_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The existing threshold is inherited, conventional, copied from another context, or optimized only for accuracy. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The existing threshold is inherited, conventional, copied from another context, or optimized only for accuracy."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PARTIALLY_DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A team independently deriving a new cutoff from its present decision problem would not instantiate the inherited editorial p < .05 ritual described by the exact record.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Null Ritual", "one_liner": "The institutionalised practice of mechanically executing a null hypothesis significance test — nil-null, p-value, p < .05 verdict — severed from the alternatives, priors, effect sizes, and decision context inference requires, yet retaining full editorial authority as if it had not been.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:null_ritual", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "null_ritual"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "null_ritual", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P042-C13-U1", "why_it_fits": "The null ritual is definitionally an already-institutionalized, gatekeeper-required threshold practice, not a freshly derived bespoke cutoff, so the authority and temporal inheritance are constitutive."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A significance threshold selected from an explicit loss function rather than convention would be legitimate decision design, which the exact record distinguishes from the ritual.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Null Ritual", "one_liner": "The institutionalised practice of mechanically executing a null hypothesis significance test — nil-null, p-value, p < .05 verdict — severed from the alternatives, priors, effect sizes, and decision context inference requires, yet retaining full editorial authority as if it had not been.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:null_ritual", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "null_ritual"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "null_ritual", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P042-C13-U2", "why_it_fits": "Every null-ritual instance mechanically applies the conventional p < .05 cliff because the publication culture treats it as the authoritative default."}], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 4, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 2, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 2}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Naming the two error types does not entail an inherited or accuracy-only threshold.", "slug": "type_i_type_ii_errors"}], "normalized_requirement": "The threshold is inherited, conventional, copied, or optimized only for accuracy.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "PARTIAL_EXISTING_DSA_GROUNDING", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation grounded 2 of 4 eligible atomic units; the remaining unit or units stayed open."}, "predicate": "The threshold is inherited, conventional, copied, or optimized only for accuracy.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires a fitted rule frozen while its calibration distribution moves, opening a performance-degrading gap.", "role_mapping": "Old threshold -> fitted rule; changed base rate or measurement -> moving distribution.", "slug": "calibrated_rule_vs_moving_world", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b026_a08_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Conditions such as prevalence, base rate, measurement quality, stakeholder tolerance, or intervention cost have changed. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Conditions such as prevalence, base rate, measurement quality, stakeholder tolerance, or intervention cost have changed."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Calibrated Rule versus Moving World", "one_liner": "A rule, model, or policy fitted to a past distribution of the world degrades as the world it was calibrated on drifts away from that distribution.", "page_ref": "prime:calibrated_rule_vs_moving_world", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Old threshold -> fitted rule; changed base rate or measurement -> moving distribution.", "slug": "calibrated_rule_vs_moving_world", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires a fitted rule frozen while its calibration distribution moves, opening a performance-degrading gap."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Prevalence, measurement quality, tolerance, or intervention cost has changed since calibration.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The system is criticized for either too many false alarms or too many missed detections.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A threshold may silently decide that false alarms are worse than missed cases, or that missed cases are worse than false alarms, without anyone explicitly endorsing that choice. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The system is criticized for either too many false alarms or too many missed detections. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The system is criticized for either too many false alarms or too many missed detections.", "A threshold may silently decide that false alarms are worse than missed cases, or that missed cases are worse than false alarms, without anyone explicitly endorsing that choice."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The system is criticized for either too many false alarms or too many missed detections."}, {"display_text": "The threshold affects downstream burden, such as human review queues, clinical follow-up, audit load, user friction, or enforcement costs.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system uses an action, detection, or escalation threshold without explicitly considering the asymmetric costs of false positives and false negatives, so its decisions over-alarm, under-detect, over-punish, miss serious cases, or drift into an implicit risk posture no one actually endorsed. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The threshold affects downstream burden, such as human review queues, clinical follow-up, audit load, user friction, or enforcement costs. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The threshold affects downstream burden, such as human review queues, clinical follow-up, audit load, user friction, or enforcement costs.", "A system uses an action, detection, or escalation threshold without explicitly considering the asymmetric costs of false positives and false negatives, so its decisions over-alarm, under-detect, over-punish, miss serious cases, or drift into an implicit risk posture no one actually endorsed."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The threshold affects downstream burden, such as human review queues, clinical follow-up, audit load, user friction, or enforcement costs."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 26, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-026", "ledger_sha256": "847cddc1fda93cf1363663c6851e2a324cbe76f36d2c8bb092003b940b38f6c1"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Escalation Exit Gate", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:escalation_exit_gate", "slug": "escalation_exit_gate"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is that the people closest to the commitment often have the strongest reasons to defend it. They may have advocated for it, built their identity around it, promised results, or persuaded others to support it. As a result, the decision process begins to protect the meaning of the past instead of evaluating the value of the next step.\n\nThis creates a continuation default: unless something dramatic happens, more resources are added. Bad news is reinterpreted as a reason to try harder. Alternative uses of resources disappear from view. The longer the commitment continues, the harder it becomes to stop.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A project, strategy, investment, program, or commitment continues because prior investment, reputation, identity, or face-saving pressure makes stopping feel like failure, even when current evidence no longer justifies renewed commitment."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires unrecoverable prior investment operating as a reason for fresh commitment.", "role_mapping": "Prior investment -> sunk cost; course -> existing action.", "slug": "escalation_of_commitment", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b026_a09_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Material prior investment has accumulated. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Material prior investment has accumulated."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Escalation of Commitment", "one_liner": "Persist beyond justification.", "page_ref": "prime:escalation_of_commitment", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Prior investment -> sunk cost; course -> existing action.", "slug": "escalation_of_commitment", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires unrecoverable prior investment operating as a reason for fresh commitment."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Material prior investment has accumulated in a continuing course of action.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The failure is additional commitment to an existing course despite a prospective analysis favoring redirect or exit.", "role_mapping": "Continuation default -> additional commitment; omitted comparison -> retrospective stance.", "slug": "escalation_of_commitment", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b026_a09_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Continuation is treated as the default. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Continuation is treated as the default."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Escalation of Commitment", "one_liner": "Persist beyond justification.", "page_ref": "prime:escalation_of_commitment", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Continuation default -> additional commitment; omitted comparison -> retrospective stance.", "slug": "escalation_of_commitment", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The failure is additional commitment to an existing course despite a prospective analysis favoring redirect or exit."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Continuation receives default status rather than fresh prospective comparison.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Persisting despite deteriorating outcomes or unfavorable forward prospects is mandatory.", "role_mapping": "Weakened evidence -> deteriorating prospects.", "slug": "escalation_of_commitment", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b026_a09_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Evidence has changed or weakened. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Evidence has changed or weakened."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Escalation of Commitment", "one_liner": "Persist beyond justification.", "page_ref": "prime:escalation_of_commitment", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Weakened evidence -> deteriorating prospects.", "slug": "escalation_of_commitment", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Persisting despite deteriorating outcomes or unfavorable forward prospects is mandatory."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Forward evidence has weakened or become unfavorable.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P043-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an ongoing or active commitment from which exit is meaningful.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A project, strategy, investment, program, or equivalent commitment is focal.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an exit from the same commitment rather than a generic story or unrelated status change.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A contemplated exit would stop, withdraw from, or de-escalate that commitment.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the face-saving or status-preserving character of the missing exit.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The relevant exit would preserve honor, face, legitimacy, or status through its framing or path.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve absence of the face-saving exit rather than an available exit that actors decline to use.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "No such honorable or status-preserving exit is available.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "No honorable narrative or status-preserving exit is available.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A focal commitment has no honorable or status-preserving exit available.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P043-C01-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A project may lack an exit story while its continuation remains prospectively justified, and narratives need not concern exit.", "slug": "narrative"}], "residual_id": "r:escalation_exit_gate:b026_a09_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b026_a09_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: There is no honorable exit story. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["There is no honorable exit story."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_SYNTHESIS", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Tried an exit-on-terms instance that preserved status, but every exit must concede the objective and the qualifier makes that concession forfeit the relevant status.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Attrition Trap", "one_liner": "Diagnose a grinding campaign as failing-without-being-lost when its operational clock runs but its strategic clock has stopped — because the conversion assumption linking losses to strategic transition was falsified — and lock-in prevents exit.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:attrition_trap", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O3", "O4"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "objective_concession_forfeits_status", "predicate": "Any exit that concedes the campaign objective would forfeit, rather than preserve, the contestant's relevant honor, legitimacy, or status.", "rationale": "Independent exact-record review confirms universal necessity, valid role mapping, qualification scope, and projection safety for this retained expression."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "attrition_trap"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "Any exit that concedes the campaign objective would forfeit, rather than preserve, the contestant's relevant honor, legitimacy, or status."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "attrition_trap", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P043-C01-U1", "why_it_fits": "The tightened qualifier does not restate the head: it links the candidate's unavoidable objective concession to status forfeiture, which necessarily rules out a status-preserving exit."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "No honorable narrative or status-preserving exit is available.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Sponsors or teams have reputational exposure.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Sponsors or teams have reputational exposure. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Sponsors or teams have reputational exposure."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Sponsors or teams have reputational exposure."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 26, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-026", "ledger_sha256": "847cddc1fda93cf1363663c6851e2a324cbe76f36d2c8bb092003b940b38f6c1"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": [{"groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_SYNTHESIS", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A low-authority admirer or hired manager can defend a thesis but fails the bridge and the founder-blind-spot originator condition; with authorship, public commitment, and authority, sponsorship follows.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_BRIDGE", "name": "Founder Blind Spot", "one_liner": "The venture pattern where a thesis's originator, holding the authority to reroute disconfirming signals, systematically preserves their prior instead of revising it — because revision is uniquely expensive at the authoring seat.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:founder_blind_spot", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O3"], "guard_type": "TYPE_SUBSUMPTION", "kind": "INTERPRETIVE_BRIDGE", "normalized_key": "authoritative_originator_is_thesis_sponsor", "predicate": "An originator who publicly commits to and holds decision authority over a thesis is that thesis's sponsoring actor.", "rationale": "The retained guarded expression preserves all principal roles and the relation family; one atomic anchored qualifier fills exactly the remaining branch gaps."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "founder_blind_spot"}, {"kind": "INTERPRETIVE_BRIDGE", "value": "authoritative_originator_is_thesis_sponsor"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "founder_blind_spot", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P042-C15-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record directly entails prior authored commitment and reputational cost of reversal; one general type bridge identifies the authoritative committed originator as sponsor."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A convenient metric retained without social lock-in is merely a weak metric; it lacks the persistence-after-refutation and status exposure constitutive of vanity-metric addiction.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Vanity-Metric Addiction", "one_liner": "A team locks onto a metric chosen for how impressive it looks rather than its causal link to the outcome, then keeps it after the disconnect is known because dropping it carries social cost.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:vanity_metric_addiction", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "vanity_metric_addiction"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "vanity_metric_addiction", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P042-C15-U1", "why_it_fits": "The addiction layer is precisely persistence after causal refutation because dropping the already-selected metric threatens the team's social standing with its evaluators."}], "publication_role": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT_ONLY", "source_residual_occurrence_id": "r:escalation_exit_gate:b026_a09_c4", "unit": {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P042-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must contain the prior choice to which reputation is tied.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A prior choice or commitment is present.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail reputational stake in the choice rather than generic involvement.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "An actor's reputation is exposed by or tied to that prior choice.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfying this branch must type the reputation-bearing actor as a sponsor.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "In one branch, the exposed actor is a sponsor.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfying this branch must type the reputation-bearing actor as a team.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "In the alternative branch, the exposed actor is a team.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve the prior-choice timing rather than prospective reputation in an unmade decision.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The reputational exposure follows from an already-made choice or commitment.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "A sponsor or a team has reputational exposure tied to a prior choice or commitment.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A commitment-holding actor's reputation is tied to its prior choice.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P042-C15-U1"}}]}
{"archetype": {"name": "Escalation-Ladder Advantage Governance", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:escalation_ladder_advantage_governance", "slug": "escalation_ladder_advantage_governance"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 2 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 2}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A strategic interaction can climb through multiple levels of intensity, but the parties lack a governed advantage profile that makes continued escalation look worse than stopping. This creates bluffing, probing, miscalculation, uncontrolled severity, or an incentive to jump to higher rungs before disadvantage becomes visible.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A strategic interaction can climb through multiple levels of intensity, but the parties lack a governed advantage profile that makes continued escalation look worse than stopping. This creates bluffing, probing, miscalculation, uncontrolled severity, or an incentive to jump to higher rungs before disadvantage becomes visible."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires contending parties and an ordered intensity ladder of increasing cost, scope, or severity.", "role_mapping": "Interaction -> contest; rungs -> escalation ladder.", "slug": "escalation_dominance", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b026_a10_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The interaction has distinguishable rungs of intensity, pressure, enforcement, retaliation, risk, cost, or public commitment. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The interaction has distinguishable rungs of intensity, pressure, enforcement, retaliation, risk, cost, or public commitment."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Escalation Dominance", "one_liner": "Holding a credible per-rung advantage across a conflict's intensity ladder, so the contest resolves below the top because the disadvantaged party prefers stopping to climbing into a losing position.", "page_ref": "prime:escalation_dominance", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Interaction -> contest; rungs -> escalation ladder.", "slug": "escalation_dominance", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires contending parties and an ordered intensity ladder of increasing cost, scope, or severity."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "An adversarial interaction has distinguishable rungs of intensity, cost, risk, or commitment.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Credibility of climbing and control over the ladder's pace and direction require parties with choices to stop or ascend.", "role_mapping": "Party choice -> climb or stop; widening -> pace and direction control.", "slug": "escalation_dominance", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b026_a10_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: At least one party can choose whether to stop, comply, pause, negotiate, climb, bypass, or widen the contest. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["At least one party can choose whether to stop, comply, pause, negotiate, climb, bypass, or widen the contest."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Escalation Dominance", "one_liner": "Holding a credible per-rung advantage across a conflict's intensity ladder, so the contest resolves below the top because the disadvantaged party prefers stopping to climbing into a losing position.", "page_ref": "prime:escalation_dominance", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Party choice -> climb or stop; widening -> pace and direction control.", "slug": "escalation_dominance", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Credibility of climbing and control over the ladder's pace and direction require parties with choices to stop or ascend."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "At least one party can stop, comply, negotiate, climb, bypass, or widen the contest.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Resolution below the top is preferable to full escalation for system safety, legitimacy, cost, or long-term relationship reasons.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Credible advantage can prevent escalation, but advantage that is vague, humiliating, disproportionate, or unlimited can itself become the reason escalation accelerates. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: Resolution below the top is preferable to full escalation for system safety, legitimacy, cost, or long-term relationship reasons. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Resolution below the top is preferable to full escalation for system safety, legitimacy, cost, or long-term relationship reasons.", "Credible advantage can prevent escalation, but advantage that is vague, humiliating, disproportionate, or unlimited can itself become the reason escalation accelerates."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Resolution below the top is preferable to full escalation for system safety, legitimacy, cost, or long-term relationship reasons."}, {"display_text": "The actor attempting to hold the ladder has or can build credible capacity, authority, resilience, support, or information at multiple rungs.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: The actor attempting to hold the ladder has or can build credible capacity, authority, resilience, support, or information at multiple rungs. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The actor attempting to hold the ladder has or can build credible capacity, authority, resilience, support, or information at multiple rungs."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The actor attempting to hold the ladder has or can build credible capacity, authority, resilience, support, or information at multiple rungs."}, {"display_text": "The counterpart’s preferences, outside options, audience pressures, fear of humiliation, and possible bypass routes can be modeled imperfectly but explicitly.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: The counterpart’s preferences, outside options, audience pressures, fear of humiliation, and possible bypass routes can be modeled imperfectly but explicitly. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The counterpart’s preferences, outside options, audience pressures, fear of humiliation, and possible bypass routes can be modeled imperfectly but explicitly."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The counterpart’s preferences, outside options, audience pressures, fear of humiliation, and possible bypass routes can be modeled imperfectly but explicitly."}, {"display_text": "Upper rungs carry enough danger that ceilings, review gates, collateral-harm controls, or third-party channels are required.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: Upper rungs carry enough danger that ceilings, review gates, collateral-harm controls, or third-party channels are required. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Upper rungs carry enough danger that ceilings, review gates, collateral-harm controls, or third-party channels are required."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Upper rungs carry enough danger that ceilings, review gates, collateral-harm controls, or third-party channels are required."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 26, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-026", "ledger_sha256": "847cddc1fda93cf1363663c6851e2a324cbe76f36d2c8bb092003b940b38f6c1"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Essential-Accidental Complexity Triage", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:essential_accidental_complexity_triage", "slug": "essential_accidental_complexity_triage"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 3 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system carries high cognitive, coordination, maintenance, validation, or change burden, but teams cannot tell whether the burden is necessary for solving the real problem or merely an artifact of the current architecture, representation, process, tooling, legacy integration, or boundary drawing.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system carries high cognitive, coordination, maintenance, validation, or change burden, but teams cannot tell whether the burden is necessary for solving the real problem or merely an artifact of the current architecture, representation, process, tooling, legacy integration, or boundary drawing."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P043-C02", "dnf": [], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [], "predicate": "Complaints about the system's complexity recur.", "resolution": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RESIDUAL", "semantic_scope": "NON_ABSTRACTION", "structural_head": "Actors repeatedly complain about a system's complexity.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P043-C02-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P043-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve plural proposals or positions capable of disagreement.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "At least two simplification proposals or proposal positions are present.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a common simplification target rather than unrelated proposals.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The proposals concern simplification of the same focal system or process.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve removability judgments, not merely different implementation preferences.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Each proposal identifies complexity it treats as removable or non-removable.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve incompatible removability judgments across the proposals.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The proposals disagree about what complexity can be removed.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Simplification proposals disagree about which complexity can be removed.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Simplification proposals disagree about which system complexity is removable.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P043-C02-U2"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The essential-accidental partition can be explicit and agreed, with no recurring complaint or proposal dispute.", "slug": "accidental_vs_essential_complexity"}], "residual_id": "r:essential_accidental_complexity_triage:b026_a11_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b026_a11_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Complexity complaints recur but simplification proposals disagree about what can be removed. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Complexity complaints recur but simplification proposals disagree about what can be removed."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 1, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The essential-accidental partition can be explicit and agreed, with no recurring complaint or proposal dispute.", "slug": "accidental_vs_essential_complexity"}], "normalized_requirement": "Complexity complaints recur while simplification proposals disagree on removability.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Complexity complaints recur while simplification proposals disagree on removability.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires a durable system accumulating maybe-obsolete elements because local removal risk exceeds per-cycle retention cost.", "role_mapping": "Legacy elements -> unclear-purpose elements; accumulation -> retain-unless-safe rule.", "slug": "retention_under_removal_uncertainty", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b026_a11_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Legacy rules, adapters, workflows, options, exceptions, or abstractions accumulate faster than they are retired. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Legacy rules, adapters, workflows, options, exceptions, or abstractions accumulate faster than they are retired."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Retention Under Removal Uncertainty", "one_liner": "A durable system accumulates obsolete-but-not-removable elements because each removal decision faces an asymmetric cost that loses individually and wins only in the integral.", "page_ref": "prime:retention_under_removal_uncertainty", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Legacy elements -> unclear-purpose elements; accumulation -> retain-unless-safe rule.", "slug": "retention_under_removal_uncertainty", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires a durable system accumulating maybe-obsolete elements because local removal risk exceeds per-cycle retention cost."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Legacy rules, adapters, workflows, exceptions, or abstractions accumulate faster than retirement.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P043-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve plural stakeholders rather than one actor defending several parts.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "At least two distinct stakeholders are involved.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve nonidentical system parts under one system boundary.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "At least two distinct parts of the same focal system are defended.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an essentiality defense rather than mere ownership or preference.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Each stakeholder defends a focal system part as essential.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the different-stakeholder/different-part mapping.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The stakeholders' defended parts differ.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Different stakeholders defend different system parts as essential.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Different stakeholders defend different parts of one system as essential.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P043-C03-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P043-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve more than one essentiality defense so the frequency claim is meaningful.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Multiple stakeholder defenses of system parts as essential occur across the relevant set.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve absence of explicit evidentiary support for the defenses being counted.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The relevant essentiality defenses lack explicit supporting evidence.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail frequent evidence absence across the relevant defense instances; mere recurrence in a small subset is insufficient, while every defense need not lack evidence.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Absence of explicit evidence occurs often across the relevant essentiality-defense instances.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}], "predicate": "Stakeholder claims that system parts are essential often lack explicit evidence.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Stakeholder essentiality defenses frequently lack explicit evidence.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P043-C03-U2"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A representation-invariance test can supply explicit evidence and eliminate stakeholder disagreement.", "slug": "accidental_vs_essential_complexity"}], "residual_id": "r:essential_accidental_complexity_triage:b026_a11_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b026_a11_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Different stakeholders defend different parts of the system as essential, often without explicit evidence. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Different stakeholders defend different parts of the system as essential, often without explicit evidence."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 2, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 2}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A representation-invariance test can supply explicit evidence and eliminate stakeholder disagreement.", "slug": "accidental_vs_essential_complexity"}], "normalized_requirement": "Stakeholders defend different system parts as essential without explicit evidence.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 2 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Stakeholders defend different system parts as essential without explicit evidence.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A team wants to simplify without losing domain distinctions, safety requirements, legal obligations, or interoperability commitments.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: A team wants to simplify without losing domain distinctions, safety requirements, legal obligations, or interoperability commitments. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A team wants to simplify without losing domain distinctions, safety requirements, legal obligations, or interoperability commitments."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "A team wants to simplify without losing domain distinctions, safety requirements, legal obligations, or interoperability commitments."}, {"display_text": "Maintenance, onboarding, validation, or coordination cost is high relative to delivered behavior.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system carries high cognitive, coordination, maintenance, validation, or change burden, but teams cannot tell whether the burden is necessary for solving the real problem or merely an artifact of the current architecture, representation, process, tooling, legacy integration, or boundary drawing. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Maintenance, onboarding, validation, or coordination cost is high relative to delivered behavior. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Maintenance, onboarding, validation, or coordination cost is high relative to delivered behavior.", "A system carries high cognitive, coordination, maintenance, validation, or change burden, but teams cannot tell whether the burden is necessary for solving the real problem or merely an artifact of the current architecture, representation, process, tooling, legacy integration, or boundary drawing."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Maintenance, onboarding, validation, or coordination cost is high relative to delivered behavior."}, {"display_text": "A redesign, migration, refactoring, policy reform, or platform consolidation creates an opportunity to separate necessary from needless difficulty.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this deployment constraint: A redesign, migration, refactoring, policy reform, or platform consolidation creates an opportunity to separate necessary from needless difficulty. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A redesign, migration, refactoring, policy reform, or platform consolidation creates an opportunity to separate necessary from needless difficulty."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "A redesign, migration, refactoring, policy reform, or platform consolidation creates an opportunity to separate necessary from needless difficulty."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 26, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-026", "ledger_sha256": "847cddc1fda93cf1363663c6851e2a324cbe76f36d2c8bb092003b940b38f6c1"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Essential Structure Extraction", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:essential_structure_extraction", "slug": "essential_structure_extraction"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is detail overload with hidden relation structure. The system contains too many facts, examples, local differences, or surface variations for people to see what must be preserved. Participants may debate anecdotes, chase exceptions, or overfit to one case because they lack a shared rule for deciding which details matter.\n\nThe root tension is tractability versus fidelity. If too little detail is removed, the situation remains unusable. If too much detail is removed, the abstraction becomes elegant but false.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Actors are overwhelmed by examples, local detail, surface labels, noise, exceptions, or implementation specifics and cannot see the underlying pattern needed for action."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P043-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a discussion or equivalent exchange containing the compared content.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A focal discussion or analytic exchange is the information setting.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve high detail volume rather than one isolated detail.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The discussion contains many details.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve relational structure as the comparison object, not merely fewer labels or examples.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Stable relationships among the discussed elements are the relevant underlying structure.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve scarcity or obscurity of visible stable relations in contrast with abundant detail.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Few stable relationships are visible relative to the volume of detail.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "A discussion contains many details but few visible stable relationships.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A discussion contains many details relative to few visible stable relationships.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P043-C04-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Decomposition can expose many stable part relations and does not require detail overload or relational scarcity.", "slug": "decomposition"}], "residual_id": "r:essential_structure_extraction:b026_a12_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b026_a12_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A discussion contains many details but few stable relationships. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A discussion contains many details but few stable relationships."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Decomposition can expose many stable part relations and does not require detail overload or relational scarcity.", "slug": "decomposition"}], "normalized_requirement": "A discussion contains many details but few visible stable relationships.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A discussion contains many details but few visible stable relationships.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P043-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve local case-specific complexity rather than general resource shortage or domain complexity alone.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The blocking burden is complexity specific to the focal case.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve actual blockage caused by the complexity, not mere inconvenience.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "That case-specific complexity prevents the focal effort from progressing.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve design as the activity prevented from progressing.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The blocked effort is a design effort.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve analysis as the activity prevented from progressing.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The blocked effort is an analysis effort.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Case-specific complexity blocks design or analysis.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Case-specific complexity blocks a design effort or an analysis effort.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P043-C05-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The essential-accidental distinction can be applied to a tractable case that is not blocked.", "slug": "accidental_vs_essential_complexity"}], "residual_id": "r:essential_structure_extraction:b026_a12_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b026_a12_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A design or analysis effort is blocked by case-specific complexity. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A design or analysis effort is blocked by case-specific complexity."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The essential-accidental distinction can be applied to a tractable case that is not blocked.", "slug": "accidental_vs_essential_complexity"}], "normalized_requirement": "Case-specific complexity blocks design or analysis.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Case-specific complexity blocks design or analysis.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P043-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an actor who possesses the insight rather than an unavailable or undiscovered insight.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A learner, stakeholder, or equivalent actor holds a focal insight.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an originating case in which the insight is held.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The insight is understood or available in at least one source case.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve cross-case difference rather than reuse within the original case.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A distinct target case is available for attempted application of the same insight.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve transfer inability rather than a voluntary choice not to apply an otherwise transferable insight.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The actor cannot transfer or apply the insight to the target case.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "A learner or stakeholder cannot transfer an insight across cases.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An insight-holder cannot transfer an insight from one case to another.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P043-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Transfer can succeed; the prime describes applying knowledge across contexts rather than requiring failure.", "slug": "transfer_of_learning"}], "residual_id": "r:essential_structure_extraction:b026_a12_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b026_a12_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A learner or stakeholder cannot transfer insight across cases. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A learner or stakeholder cannot transfer insight across cases."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Transfer can succeed; the prime describes applying knowledge across contexts rather than requiring failure.", "slug": "transfer_of_learning"}], "normalized_requirement": "A learner or stakeholder cannot transfer an insight across cases.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A learner or stakeholder cannot transfer an insight across cases.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A high-level decision is required before every implementation detail can be known.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It fits especially well when a team needs to transfer insight across cases, build a model, explain a pattern, scope a design, or make a high-level decision before every implementation detail is known. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: A high-level decision is required before every implementation detail can be known. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A high-level decision is required before every implementation detail can be known.", "It fits especially well when a team needs to transfer insight across cases, build a model, explain a pattern, scope a design, or make a high-level decision before every implementation detail is known."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "A high-level decision is required before every implementation detail can be known."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 26, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-026", "ledger_sha256": "847cddc1fda93cf1363663c6851e2a324cbe76f36d2c8bb092003b940b38f6c1"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Essentialism Audit", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:essentialism_audit", "slug": "essentialism_audit"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 6, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 2, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 5, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 5 of 6 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is category rigidity through presumed essence. A category that may have started as shorthand becomes an explanation. Variation inside the category is ignored. Context, history, incentives, exposure, support, and measurement artifacts become invisible. Boundary cases are treated as anomalies instead of evidence that the category model may be conditional or constructed.\n\nOnce the fixed claim enters a decision system, it can become self-confirming. People receive less opportunity because they are labeled as low potential; their lower future performance then appears to confirm the original label. A group is monitored more intensely because it is considered risky; the resulting data then makes the group appear inherently risky.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A category, identity, ability, role, culture, risk class, or object type is treated as if it has an inherent, stable, explanatory core. People then use that presumed essence to explain behavior, allocate opportunity, assign blame or credibility, design interventions, interpret data, or decide who belongs. The result is rigid classification: variation is ignored, context disappears, development is underestimated, historical contingency is hidden, and decision systems reproduce the very patterns they claim to discover."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record makes a de re modal claim that kind members necessarily possess jointly sufficient and necessary properties.", "role_mapping": "Natural necessity -> de re modal essence.", "slug": "essentialism", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b026_a13_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A category explanation sounds natural, inevitable, or destiny-like. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A category explanation sounds natural, inevitable, or destiny-like."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Essentialism", "one_liner": "Inherent defining properties.", "page_ref": "prime:essentialism", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Natural necessity -> de re modal essence.", "slug": "essentialism", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record makes a de re modal claim that kind members necessarily possess jointly sufficient and necessary properties."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A category explanation is presented as natural, necessary, inevitable, or destiny-like.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires a real kind whose essence fixes membership and identity rather than a merely nominal label.", "role_mapping": "Group membership -> kind; stable nature -> essential properties.", "slug": "essentialism", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b026_a13_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A policy or model uses group membership as if it reveals stable nature. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A policy or model uses group membership as if it reveals stable nature."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Essentialism", "one_liner": "Inherent defining properties.", "page_ref": "prime:essentialism", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Group membership -> kind; stable nature -> essential properties.", "slug": "essentialism", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires a real kind whose essence fixes membership and identity rather than a merely nominal label."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A policy or model treats group membership as revealing a stable nature.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P043-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an interpreting actor rather than an unowned statistical association.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A team, analyst, or equivalent interpreter evaluates observed behavior.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve group-level trait attribution rather than only an individual's disposition.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The proposed explanation is a trait attributed to a social group.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the directed trait-as-explanation relation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The interpreter uses the attributed group trait to explain the behavior.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve attribution before contextual inquiry, not a conclusion reached after context has been tested.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The group-trait explanation precedes examination of relevant context.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "Behavior is explained as a group trait before context is examined.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An interpreter explains behavior as a group trait before examining its context.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P043-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact bias overweights an observed actor's disposition and need not generalize behavior to a social group trait.", "slug": "fundamental_attribution_error"}], "residual_id": "r:essentialism_audit:b026_a13_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b026_a13_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A team interprets behavior as a group trait before examining context. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A team interprets behavior as a group trait before examining context."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact bias overweights an observed actor's disposition and need not generalize behavior to a social group trait.", "slug": "fundamental_attribution_error"}], "normalized_requirement": "Behavior is explained as a group trait before context is examined.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Behavior is explained as a group trait before context is examined.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Every instance of the kind is claimed to share the essence, while only accidental properties may vary.", "role_mapping": "Internal uniformity -> shared necessary essence.", "slug": "essentialism", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b026_a13_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Category members are described as internally uniform. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Category members are described as internally uniform."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Essentialism", "one_liner": "Inherent defining properties.", "page_ref": "prime:essentialism", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Internal uniformity -> shared necessary essence.", "slug": "essentialism", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Every instance of the kind is claimed to share the essence, while only accidental properties may vary."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Category members are described as internally uniform in their defining nature.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B5", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P043-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an essence claim rather than a purely probabilistic category description.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A category is claimed to have an inherent or stable essence.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve observed cases rather than merely hypothetical exceptions.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Boundary cases for that category have actually been observed.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve counterevidence directed at the same essence claim.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The boundary cases conflict with identity conditions or predictions attributed to the supposed essence.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the cases' undermining evidentiary effect rather than their accommodation without revision.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The observed boundary cases weaken or undermine the supposed essence.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Observed boundary cases undermine the supposed essence.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Observed boundary cases undermine a category's supposed essence.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P043-C08-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An essentialist kind can have no observed boundary counterexample under its stated identity conditions.", "slug": "essentialism"}], "residual_id": "r:essentialism_audit:b026_a13_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b026_a13_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Boundary cases undermine the supposed essence. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Boundary cases undermine the supposed essence."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Label ambiguity can be acknowledged as probabilistic from the outset, in which case no essence claim exists for the boundary cases to undermine.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Label Ambiguity", "one_liner": "Diagnose a headline accuracy figure as a blend of two measurements — model capability in the class interior where annotators agree, and mere adjudication agreement in the boundary zone where reasonable experts split — by stratifying metrics on the inter-annotator agreement rate.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:label_ambiguity", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1", "O3", "O4"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "hard_boundary_treated_as_category_essence", "predicate": "The pipeline treats its hard category boundary as an inherent and stable essence of the category.", "rationale": "Independent exact-record review confirms universal necessity, valid role mapping, qualification scope, and projection safety for this retained expression."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "label_ambiguity"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The pipeline treats its hard category boundary as an inherent and stable essence of the category."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "label_ambiguity", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P043-C08-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record directly supplies observed boundary counterevidence against a hard-label fiction. One candidate-anchored qualifier states that the fiction is being treated as the category's essence."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Observed boundary cases undermine the supposed essence.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 5", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B6", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P043-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a descriptive pattern rather than an already normative rule.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A focal pattern descriptively characterizes a category or its members.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a decision-producing actor or structure.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A decision structure, policy, or decision-maker uses that pattern.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a normative or operational constraint rather than another description.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A prescriptive limit constrains opportunity, conduct, membership, or treatment.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the descriptive-to-prescriptive direction and cannot substitute mere correlation.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The decision structure converts the descriptive pattern into that prescriptive limit.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "A descriptive category pattern is converted into a prescriptive limit.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A decision structure turns a descriptive category pattern into a prescriptive limit.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P043-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Metaphysical essentialism can remain purely descriptive and make no policy or prescriptive claim.", "slug": "essentialism"}], "residual_id": "r:essentialism_audit:b026_a13_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b026_a13_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A decision structure turns a descriptive pattern into a prescriptive limit. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A decision structure turns a descriptive pattern into a prescriptive limit."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "If the category label did not constrain use, functional fixedness would not occur; every exact-record instance therefore preserves the descriptive-to-operational conversion.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Functional Fixedness", "one_liner": "The cognitive bias in which encoding an object under its conventional category label crowds out inspection of its raw physical properties, blocking the solver from a non-conventional use the problem needs and the object's properties would permit.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:functional_fixedness", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "functional_fixedness"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "functional_fixedness", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P043-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record directly entails all four obligations through its category-mediated decision mechanism, with no contextual qualifier or interpretive bridge needed."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A bare taxonomy with no operation-permission layer is expressly excluded by the exact record, confirming that the conversion to constraint is load-bearing.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Type System", "one_liner": "A discipline that assigns every value and expression a type and uses that classification to constrain which operations may legally apply, verifying via compositional typing rules that well-typed programs cannot reach a wrong-kinded state (soundness).", "page_ref": "domain_specific:type_system", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "type_system"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "type_system", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P043-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record directly states that classification by type is used to determine which operations may legally apply."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A descriptive category pattern is converted into a prescriptive limit.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 6", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "DISJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 26, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-026", "ledger_sha256": "847cddc1fda93cf1363663c6851e2a324cbe76f36d2c8bb092003b940b38f6c1"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Ethical Context Translation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:ethical_context_translation", "slug": "ethical_context_translation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 2, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 2 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is failed norm transfer. A rule or value travels from one context to another as if the receiving context were morally, socially, and practically identical to the source context. The result can be false universalism: an outside standard is imposed without understanding local meaning or harm. The opposite failure is unconstrained relativism: local practice is treated as self-justifying even when it violates safety, consent, dignity, fairness, or other core protections.\n\nThis problem often hides behind apparently reasonable language. Everyone may say they support fairness, respect, safety, or autonomy, while interpreting those terms differently. A headquarters policy may appear neutral to its authors and arbitrary to the people who must live under it. A local custom may appear respectful to insiders and coercive to a subgroup that cannot safely object. Ethical Context Translation makes those differences explicit enough for action.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A policy, practice, design, rule, or judgment applies one ethical frame across a different context as if meaning, risk, authority, and affected parties were unchanged; or it defers to local practice so completely that important protections disappear."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P043-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a normative object rather than a purely technical fact or label.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A rule, value, or equivalent normative standard is the transferred object.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a culture, community, jurisdiction, institution, team, role, or equivalent source context.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The rule or value has a source social context.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve context difference rather than movement within one unchanged setting.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A target social context differs from the source context across at least one relevant boundary.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the directed cross-context transfer relation.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The same rule or value is transferred from the source context into the target context.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "A rule or value is transferred across cultures, communities, jurisdictions, institutions, teams, or professional roles.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A rule or value is transferred across a social-context boundary.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P043-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Conceptual translation can concern nonethical technical meanings and need not transfer a rule or value.", "slug": "translation_and_conceptual_bridging"}], "residual_id": "r:ethical_context_translation:b026_a14_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b026_a14_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A rule or value is being transferred across cultures, communities, jurisdictions, institutions, teams, or professional roles. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A rule or value is being transferred across cultures, communities, jurisdictions, institutions, teams, or professional roles."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Conceptual translation can concern nonethical technical meanings and need not transfer a rule or value.", "slug": "translation_and_conceptual_bridging"}], "normalized_requirement": "A rule or value is transferred across cultures, jurisdictions, institutions, teams, or roles.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A rule or value is transferred across cultures, jurisdictions, institutions, teams, or roles.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P043-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a local practice rather than a context-free proposition.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A focal practice is local to a community or context.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a defender rather than mere continued existence of the practice.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "An actor, institution, or advocate defends that practice.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve context as the stated basis of the legitimacy defense.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The defender claims that the practice is legitimate because of its local context.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "A local practice is defended as contextually legitimate.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An actor defends a local practice as legitimate because of its context.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P043-C13-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P043-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the local practice as the potential source of harm.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A focal practice is local to a community or context.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve vulnerability of the affected parties rather than generic stakeholders.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The potentially affected actors are vulnerable parties.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve possible harm without strengthening the source to established actual harm.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The local practice may harm those vulnerable parties.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "The focal local practice may harm vulnerable parties.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A local practice may harm vulnerable parties.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P043-C13-U2"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Thick description can expose and criticize local harm rather than defend it.", "slug": "thick_description"}], "residual_id": "r:ethical_context_translation:b026_a14_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b026_a14_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A local practice is defended as contextual even though it may harm vulnerable parties. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A local practice is defended as contextual even though it may harm vulnerable parties."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PARTIALLY_DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A contraindicated treatment may be newly proposed rather than locally practiced, so locality is not entailed by the record alone.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Contraindication", "one_liner": "Flag the sparse patient conditions under which a normally-indicated treatment becomes inadvisable, by naming the specific context in which its risk-benefit balance flips sign.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:contraindication", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "indicated_treatment_is_local_practice", "predicate": "The normally indicated treatment is the local practice under review.", "rationale": "Independent exact-record review confirms universal necessity, valid role mapping, qualification scope, and projection safety for this retained expression."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "contraindication"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The normally indicated treatment is the local practice under review."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "contraindication", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P043-C13-U2", "why_it_fits": "The candidate directly contains an intervention, a conditionally vulnerable patient, and expected harm. One role-binding qualifier supplies only the local-practice status."}], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 2, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 1, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Thick description can expose and criticize local harm rather than defend it.", "slug": "thick_description"}], "normalized_requirement": "A harmful local practice is defended as contextually legitimate.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "PARTIAL_EXISTING_DSA_GROUNDING", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation grounded 1 of 2 eligible atomic units; the remaining unit or units stayed open."}, "predicate": "A harmful local practice is defended as contextually legitimate.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P043-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a normative object rather than a purely technical fact or label.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A rule, value, or equivalent normative standard is the transferred object.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a culture, community, jurisdiction, institution, team, role, or equivalent source context.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The rule or value has a source social context.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve context difference rather than movement within one unchanged setting.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A target social context differs from the source context across at least one relevant boundary.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the directed cross-context transfer relation.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The same rule or value is transferred from the source context into the target context.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "A rule or value is transferred across cultures, communities, jurisdictions, institutions, teams, or professional roles.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A rule or value is transferred across a social-context boundary.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P043-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Conceptual translation can concern nonethical technical meanings and need not transfer a rule or value.", "slug": "translation_and_conceptual_bridging"}], "residual_id": "r:ethical_context_translation:b026_a14_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b026_a14_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A rule or value is being transferred across cultures, communities, jurisdictions, institutions, teams, or professional roles. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A rule or value is being transferred across cultures, communities, jurisdictions, institutions, teams, or professional roles."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Conceptual translation can concern nonethical technical meanings and need not transfer a rule or value.", "slug": "translation_and_conceptual_bridging"}], "normalized_requirement": "A rule or value is transferred across cultures, jurisdictions, institutions, teams, or roles.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A rule or value is transferred across cultures, jurisdictions, institutions, teams, or roles.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P043-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an ethics process rather than any administrative workflow.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A focal process performs ethical review, reasoning, or assessment.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve checklist form rather than another simplification medium.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A checklist is the resulting representation or operating form.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the process-to-checklist reduction direction.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The ethics process is reduced to that checklist form.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "An ethics process is reduced to a checklist.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An ethics process is reduced to checklist form.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P043-C14-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P043-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an ethics checklist rather than a generic list.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A focal checklist is used for an ethics process.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve relevant local meaning rather than generic missing detail.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The target setting contains meaning specific to its local context.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve omission of local meaning, not a checklist that explicitly incorporates it.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The ethics checklist does not represent or attend to that local meaning.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "The resulting ethics checklist ignores local meaning.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An ethics checklist omits meaning specific to the local context.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P043-C14-U2"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Conceptual bridging is designed to preserve meaning between frameworks and does not require a reductive checklist.", "slug": "translation_and_conceptual_bridging"}], "residual_id": "r:ethical_context_translation:b026_a14_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b026_a14_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: An ethics process is reduced to a checklist that ignores local meaning. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["An ethics process is reduced to a checklist that ignores local meaning."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 2, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 2}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Conceptual bridging is designed to preserve meaning between frameworks and does not require a reductive checklist.", "slug": "translation_and_conceptual_bridging"}], "normalized_requirement": "An ethics checklist ignores local meaning.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 2 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "An ethics checklist ignores local meaning.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "People disagree about whether a general ethical standard should apply locally or be adapted.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when a global policy must be localized, when a professional duty meets local practice, when a product or AI rule operates across communities, or when a local exception is being proposed for a general standard. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: People disagree about whether a general ethical standard should apply locally or be adapted. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["People disagree about whether a general ethical standard should apply locally or be adapted.", "It is especially useful when a global policy must be localized, when a professional duty meets local practice, when a product or AI rule operates across communities, or when a local exception is being proposed for a general standard."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "People disagree about whether a general ethical standard should apply locally or be adapted."}, {"display_text": "A global policy, product, program, or evaluation metric is being localized.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when a global policy must be localized, when a professional duty meets local practice, when a product or AI rule operates across communities, or when a local exception is being proposed for a general standard. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: A global policy, product, program, or evaluation metric is being localized. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A global policy, product, program, or evaluation metric is being localized.", "It is especially useful when a global policy must be localized, when a professional duty meets local practice, when a product or AI rule operates across communities, or when a local exception is being proposed for a general standard."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "A global policy, product, program, or evaluation metric is being localized."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 26, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-026", "ledger_sha256": "847cddc1fda93cf1363663c6851e2a324cbe76f36d2c8bb092003b940b38f6c1"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Evaluation Criteria Suspension During Divergence", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:evaluation_criteria_suspension_during_divergence", "slug": "evaluation_criteria_suspension_during_divergence"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 4 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A group or decision system needs divergent exploration, but ordinary evaluation criteria enter too early. Feasibility, cost, evidence burden, precedent, status expectations, or implementation constraints dominate the generative phase, causing premature convergence, local-optimum bias, self-censorship, narrow option sets, and over-selection of familiar proposals.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A group or decision system needs divergent exploration, but ordinary evaluation criteria enter too early. Feasibility, cost, evidence burden, precedent, status expectations, or implementation constraints dominate the generative phase, causing premature convergence, local-optimum bias, self-censorship, narrow option sets, and over-selection of familiar proposals."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P043-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the process's stated divergent purpose.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A focal process formally calls for divergent generation, brainstorming, discovery, exploration, or an equivalent generative mode.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve idea emergence inside the same nominally divergent process.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Ideas are generated or appear within that focal process.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve actual evaluation of the generated ideas rather than later neutral recording.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The process applies evaluation criteria to those ideas.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve premature concurrent evaluation rather than a later convergence phase.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Evaluation occurs immediately as ideas appear, during the generative phase.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "A nominally divergent process evaluates ideas as they appear.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A process that formally calls for divergent generation evaluates ideas immediately as they appear.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P043-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact process separates divergence from convergence and does not require evaluation during generation.", "slug": "divergence_convergence_in_the_design_process"}], "residual_id": "r:evaluation_criteria_suspension_during_divergence:b026_a15_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b026_a15_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A process formally calls for divergence, brainstorming, discovery, or exploration but immediately evaluates ideas as they appear. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A process formally calls for divergence, brainstorming, discovery, or exploration but immediately evaluates ideas as they appear."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact process separates divergence from convergence and does not require evaluation during generation.", "slug": "divergence_convergence_in_the_design_process"}], "normalized_requirement": "A nominally divergent process evaluates ideas as they appear.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A nominally divergent process evaluates ideas as they appear.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P044-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve participants who could offer contributions, rather than unrelated observers.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Participants in a generative or contributory process are the focal actors.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail self-censorship by the potential contributors, not censorship imposed only after contribution.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The participants suppress or withhold their own potential contributions.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve anticipated evaluation as the cause of withholding, rather than an unrelated correlation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Anticipation of the applicable rejection precedes and causes the self-censorship.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve expected ridicule as the rejection form.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The anticipated rejection is ridicule.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve expected objection on feasibility grounds.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The anticipated rejection is a feasibility objection.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve expected objection on budget grounds.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The anticipated rejection is a budget objection.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve expected expert dismissal as the rejection form.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The anticipated rejection is dismissal by an expert or expert authority.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Participants self-censor because they anticipate ridicule, feasibility objections, budget objections, or expert dismissal.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Anticipated negative evaluation causes participants to self-censor during generation.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P044-C01-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Independent evaluation can occur after generation and need not induce participant self-censorship.", "slug": "editorial_independence"}], "residual_id": "r:evaluation_criteria_suspension_during_divergence:b026_a15_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b026_a15_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Participants self-censor because they expect ridicule, feasibility objections, budget objections, or expert dismissal. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Participants self-censor because they expect ridicule, feasibility objections, budget objections, or expert dismissal."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Independent evaluation can occur after generation and need not induce participant self-censorship.", "slug": "editorial_independence"}], "normalized_requirement": "Participants self-censor in anticipation of ridicule, feasibility, budget, or expert rejection.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Participants self-censor in anticipation of ridicule, feasibility, budget, or expert rejection.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P044-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve recurrence of the same familiar options rather than merely repeated option generation.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The recurring options are the same familiar options across the compared sessions.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must span at least two sessions rather than one option-selection episode.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The recurrence occurs across multiple sessions.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve the contrast between unchanged familiar options and a changed circumstance.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The familiar-option recurrence persists despite the applicable new circumstance.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve novelty in the problem being addressed.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A new problem is present in the later session or sessions.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve a materially changed context.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "A new context is present in the later session or sessions.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve novelty in the opportunity being considered.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "A new opportunity is present in the later session or sessions.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "The same familiar options recur across sessions despite new problems, contexts, or opportunities.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "The same familiar option set recurs across sessions despite a materially new circumstance.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P044-C02-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A properly divergent process can produce novel alternatives outside the initial frame.", "slug": "divergence_convergence_in_the_design_process"}], "residual_id": "r:evaluation_criteria_suspension_during_divergence:b026_a15_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b026_a15_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The same familiar options recur across sessions despite new problems, contexts, or opportunities. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The same familiar options recur across sessions despite new problems, contexts, or opportunities."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Tried a complete exact instance with only one use of the method, but the construct requires prior success followed by reuse on a new problem.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Einstellung Effect", "one_liner": "Diagnose a skilled solver's failure on a near-surface variant not as missing knowledge but as retrieval-driven blocking — the first-cued familiar method is retrieved, judged adequate, and halts search before a simpler dominating alternative is ever compared.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:einstellung_effect", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "einstellung_effect"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "einstellung_effect", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P044-C02-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every exact instance reuses the same familiar method across a prior and current problem episode despite the current problem's novelty, satisfying the new-problem branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A team can acquire and master a tool, then first select it for one new misfit problem; that is a golden hammer without recurrence across selection sessions.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Golden Hammer Anti-Pattern", "one_liner": "Diagnose a team applying its familiar technology to a poorly-fitting problem because the acquisition cost of an alternative is visible while the misfit cost is diffuse and downstream, so fluency reshapes what counts as the right tool before fit is ever asked.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:golden_hammer_anti_pattern", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1", "O2"], "guard_type": "QUANTIFIER_BINDING", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "incumbent_tool_reselected_across_sessions", "predicate": "The incumbent technology was selected in at least one earlier tool-choice session and recurs in the current new-problem session.", "rationale": "The context guard is atomic, anchored in roles already present in the exact record, and fills only the listed guardable obligation gaps."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "golden_hammer_anti_pattern"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "incumbent_tool_reselected_across_sessions"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "golden_hammer_anti_pattern", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P044-C02-U1", "why_it_fits": "The candidate supplies the familiar option, current selection, and new-problem contrast. One atomic recurrence qualifier adds the prior selection and cross-session count."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The same familiar options recur despite new problems or opportunities.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P044-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve criteria used to evaluate or select possibilities.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An existing set of evaluation or selection criteria is focal.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve the criteria's phase-limited validity rather than treating them as simply defective.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The criteria are valid within a convergence or selection phase.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve the mismatch between convergence suitability and divergent-discovery inadequacy for the same criteria.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Those same criteria are too narrow for the applicable divergent-discovery target.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve discovery of a genuinely new framing.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The blocked discovery target is a new frame.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve discovery of a new analogy.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The blocked discovery target is a new analogy.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve discovery of a novel class of solutions, not selection within a familiar class.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The blocked discovery target is a new solution family.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Criteria valid for convergence are too narrow for discovering new frames, analogies, or solution families.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Criteria valid for convergence are inadequate for divergent discovery of a new framing or solution class.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P044-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime already assigns phase-specific criteria and does not require convergence criteria to be misapplied during divergence.", "slug": "divergence_convergence_in_the_design_process"}], "residual_id": "r:evaluation_criteria_suspension_during_divergence:b026_a15_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b026_a15_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Existing criteria are valid for convergence but too narrow for finding new frames, analogies, or solution families. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Existing criteria are valid for convergence but too narrow for finding new frames, analogies, or solution families."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime already assigns phase-specific criteria and does not require convergence criteria to be misapplied during divergence.", "slug": "divergence_convergence_in_the_design_process"}], "normalized_requirement": "Criteria valid for convergence are too narrow for discovering new frames or solution families.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Criteria valid for convergence are too narrow for discovering new frames or solution families.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Teams need more option variety before making a high-commitment decision.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: Teams need more option variety before making a high-commitment decision. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Teams need more option variety before making a high-commitment decision."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Teams need more option variety before making a high-commitment decision."}, {"display_text": "Early-stage ideas are too underdeveloped to be fairly assessed by implementation-stage criteria.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A group or decision system needs divergent exploration, but ordinary evaluation criteria enter too early. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Early-stage ideas are too underdeveloped to be fairly assessed by implementation-stage criteria. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Early-stage ideas are too underdeveloped to be fairly assessed by implementation-stage criteria.", "A group or decision system needs divergent exploration, but ordinary evaluation criteria enter too early."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Early-stage ideas are too underdeveloped to be fairly assessed by implementation-stage criteria."}, {"display_text": "Status hierarchies, expert norms, or risk aversion suppress weak signals and unconventional contributions.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Status hierarchies, expert norms, or risk aversion suppress weak signals and unconventional contributions. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Status hierarchies, expert norms, or risk aversion suppress weak signals and unconventional contributions."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "Status hierarchies, expert norms, or risk aversion suppress weak signals and unconventional contributions."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 26, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-026", "ledger_sha256": "847cddc1fda93cf1363663c6851e2a324cbe76f36d2c8bb092003b940b38f6c1"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Event-Log-Centered Modeling", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:event_log_centered_modeling", "slug": "event_log_centered_modeling"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Knowledge and operational systems commonly make entities, places, periods, or current-state records primary and attach events as incidental notes. Independent updates then overwrite history, duplicate causally related facts across records, drift across views, hide how present state was produced, and make new temporal questions expensive. When sequence, participation, transformation, provenance, and correction matter, a current-state-first model cannot reliably reconstruct trajectories or distinguish what happened from what was later recorded, inferred, or revised. Yet simply collecting logs is insufficient: without event boundaries, identity, role semantics, ordering, evidence status, projection contracts, replay, completeness statements, and retention controls, the log becomes an ambiguous pile of surveillance data rather than a coherent model.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Knowledge and operational systems commonly make entities, places, periods, or current-state records primary and attach events as incidental notes. Independent updates then overwrite history, duplicate causally related facts across records, drift across views, hide how present state was produced, and make new temporal questions expensive. When sequence, participation, transformation, provenance, and correction matter, a current-state-first model cannot reliably reconstruct trajectories or distinguish what happened from what was later recorded, inferred, or revised. Yet simply collecting logs is insufficient: without event boundaries, identity, role semantics, ordering, evidence status, projection contracts, replay, completeness statements, and retention controls, the log becomes an ambiguous pile of surveillance data rather than a coherent model."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Every exact instance makes event history primary and derives present entities and states as projections, so the path to present state is load-bearing.", "role_mapping": "Path to present state -> projection over primary event nodes.", "slug": "event_centered_modeling", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b027_a01_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The path by which a present entity, relation, place, or state arose matters to explanation, audit, recovery, or decision making. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The path by which a present entity, relation, place, or state arose matters to explanation, audit, recovery, or decision making."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Event-Centered Modeling", "one_liner": "Making events the primary nodes through which entities, places, and periods are connected, so that everything else is derived as a projection of the event log.", "page_ref": "prime:event_centered_modeling", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Path to present state -> projection over primary event nodes.", "slug": "event_centered_modeling", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Every exact instance makes event history primary and derives present entities and states as projections, so the path to present state is load-bearing."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The path by which present state arose matters to explanation, audit, recovery, or decision.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P044-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve entity-centric records rather than an event-primary history.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The focal records are organized around entities or current entity states.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve a plural record population with independent maintenance paths.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "At least two records are maintained independently.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve cross-record inconsistency among corresponding entity states, not unrelated variation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Corresponding states or values in the records, which should agree, diverge from one another.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve drift over time rather than records that were merely different at their initial creation.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The divergence develops over successive updates or maintenance intervals.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "Independent entity-centric records drift from one another over time.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Independently maintained entity-centric records that should agree diverge over time.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P044-C06-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P044-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve entity-centric records rather than an event-primary history.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The focal records are organized around entities or current entity states.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve the source's plural independently maintained record context.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Multiple records are maintained independently.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve the earlier-state then later-update ordering within the same record history.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "An earlier state of a focal record exists before a later update to that same record.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve destructive replacement by the later update, not merely any record change.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The later update replaces the earlier state rather than appending a separately recoverable state.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve loss of prior history rather than versioned retention of the superseded state.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The earlier state is not preserved or recoverable in the record history after the update.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Updates to independent entity-centric records overwrite prior history.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A later update destructively replaces rather than preserves an earlier state of an independently maintained entity-centric record.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P044-C06-U2"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P044-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve entity-centric records rather than an event-primary history.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The focal records are organized around entities or current entity states.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve a plural record population with independent maintenance paths.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "At least two records are maintained independently.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve reconciliation as the process on which cross-record consistency depends.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Maintaining or restoring consistency across the records depends on a reconciliation process.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve necessary manual intervention, not optional review or automatic synchronization.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The reconciliation is required and must be performed manually rather than consistency being maintained automatically.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "Consistency across independent entity-centric records requires manual reconciliation.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Maintaining or restoring consistency across independently maintained entity-centric records necessarily depends on manual reconciliation.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P044-C06-U3"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime describes the event-primary representation after inversion and does not require an antecedent population of drifting entity-centric records.", "slug": "event_centered_modeling"}], "residual_id": "r:event_log_centered_modeling:b027_a01_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b027_a01_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Independent entity-centric records are drifting, overwriting history, or requiring manual reconciliation. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Independent entity-centric records are drifting, overwriting history, or requiring manual reconciliation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 3, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 3}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime describes the event-primary representation after inversion and does not require an antecedent population of drifting entity-centric records.", "slug": "event_centered_modeling"}], "normalized_requirement": "Independent entity-centric records drift, overwrite history, or require manual reconciliation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 3 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Independent entity-centric records drift, overwrite history, or require manual reconciliation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P044-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve a later update capable of changing the record's represented state or evidentiary status.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A correction, late evidentiary addition, retraction, revised interpretation, or equivalent later record-changing update is at issue.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve an earlier state history for the same record.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "One or more prior states of the same record precede the update.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail required preservation of the later correction or evidentiary change.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The later update must itself be preserved in the record history.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve coexistence of the update and earlier states, not destructive replacement.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Preserving the update must not erase any prior record state.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Corrections, late evidence, retractions, or revised interpretations must be preserved without erasing prior record states.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A later record-changing update must be preserved while all prior record states remain available.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P044-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Append-only event nodes do not entail that corrections, retractions, or reinterpretations ever occur.", "slug": "event_centered_modeling"}], "residual_id": "r:event_log_centered_modeling:b027_a01_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b027_a01_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Corrections, late evidence, retractions, or revised interpretations must be preserved without erasing prior record states. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Corrections, late evidence, retractions, or revised interpretations must be preserved without erasing prior record states."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Append-only event nodes do not entail that corrections, retractions, or reinterpretations ever occur.", "slug": "event_centered_modeling"}], "normalized_requirement": "Corrections, late evidence, retractions, or reinterpretations must preserve prior record states.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Corrections, late evidence, retractions, or reinterpretations must preserve prior record states.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime requires four event roles and projection, but it does not require recurrence or a demonstrated failure of every static-attribute representation.", "slug": "event_centered_modeling"}], "residual_id": "r:event_log_centered_modeling:b027_a01_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b027_a01_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Participants, roles, locations, and transformations recur across events and cannot be represented faithfully as static attributes. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Participants, roles, locations, and transformations recur across events and cannot be represented faithfully as static attributes."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime requires four event roles and projection, but it does not require recurrence or a demonstrated failure of every static-attribute representation.", "slug": "event_centered_modeling"}], "normalized_requirement": "Recurring participants, roles, locations, and transformations cannot be faithfully represented as static attributes.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Recurring participants, roles, locations, and transformations cannot be faithfully represented as static attributes.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Temporal dynamics can be governed by a fully known total order and does not require source-local or causal-order ambiguity.", "slug": "temporal_dynamics"}], "residual_id": "r:event_log_centered_modeling:b027_a01_c7", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b027_a01_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Temporal order is partial, source-local, uncertain, or distinct from causal order and needs explicit semantics. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Temporal order is partial, source-local, uncertain, or distinct from causal order and needs explicit semantics."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Temporal dynamics can be governed by a fully known total order and does not require source-local or causal-order ambiguity.", "slug": "temporal_dynamics"}], "normalized_requirement": "Temporal order is partial, source-local, uncertain, or distinct from causal order.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Temporal order is partial, source-local, uncertain, or distinct from causal order.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The defining wiring inversion stores changing facts on event nodes and computes current state as a projection rather than an independent authority.", "role_mapping": "Current view -> derived projection; event log -> authoritative event substrate.", "slug": "event_centered_modeling", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b027_a01_c9", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Current-state views can be treated as derived and rebuildable rather than independently authoritative. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [9], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Current-state views can be treated as derived and rebuildable rather than independently authoritative."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Event-Centered Modeling", "one_liner": "Making events the primary nodes through which entities, places, and periods are connected, so that everything else is derived as a projection of the event log.", "page_ref": "prime:event_centered_modeling", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Current view -> derived projection; event log -> authoritative event substrate.", "slug": "event_centered_modeling", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The defining wiring inversion stores changing facts on event nodes and computes current state as a projection rather than an independent authority."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Current-state views are derived and rebuildable rather than independently authoritative.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [9], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Multiple consumers need different current-state, historical, spatial, period, case, or aggregate views of the same underlying changes.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Knowledge and operational systems commonly make entities, places, periods, or current-state records primary and attach events as incidental notes. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Multiple consumers need different current-state, historical, spatial, period, case, or aggregate views of the same underlying changes. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Multiple consumers need different current-state, historical, spatial, period, case, or aggregate views of the same underlying changes.", "Knowledge and operational systems commonly make entities, places, periods, or current-state records primary and attach events as incidental notes."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "Multiple consumers need different current-state, historical, spatial, period, case, or aggregate views of the same underlying changes."}, {"display_text": "Replay or retrospective reconstruction is needed after failure, schema change, new research questions, or disputed conclusions.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Replay or retrospective reconstruction is needed after failure, schema change, new research questions, or disputed conclusions. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Replay or retrospective reconstruction is needed after failure, schema change, new research questions, or disputed conclusions."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Replay or retrospective reconstruction is needed after failure, schema change, new research questions, or disputed conclusions."}, {"display_text": "The same event history must support both operational and historiographic views while retaining provenance and access boundaries.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Knowledge and operational systems commonly make entities, places, periods, or current-state records primary and attach events as incidental notes. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: The same event history must support both operational and historiographic views while retaining provenance and access boundaries. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The same event history must support both operational and historiographic views while retaining provenance and access boundaries.", "Knowledge and operational systems commonly make entities, places, periods, or current-state records primary and attach events as incidental notes."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 8, "text": "The same event history must support both operational and historiographic views while retaining provenance and access boundaries."}, {"display_text": "There is enough event evidence to justify an event model and a plan for documenting what remains unobserved.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Yet simply collecting logs is insufficient: without event boundaries, identity, role semantics, ordering, evidence status, projection contracts, replay, completeness statements, and retention controls, the log becomes an ambiguous pile of surveillance data rather than a coherent model. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: There is enough event evidence to justify an event model and a plan for documenting what remains unobserved. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [10], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["There is enough event evidence to justify an event model and a plan for documenting what remains unobserved.", "Yet simply collecting logs is insufficient: without event boundaries, identity, role semantics, ordering, evidence status, projection contracts, replay, completeness statements, and retention controls, the log becomes an ambiguous pile of surveillance data rather than a coherent model."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 10, "text": "There is enough event evidence to justify an event model and a plan for documenting what remains unobserved."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 27, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-027", "ledger_sha256": "3e49ce29e847590a4aa13713441637acbc507ba689c972a674428be4fd4ad756"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": [{"groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Ordinary autobiographical recall can instantiate reconstructive memory without any failure, schema change, new research question, or dispute.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Reconstructive Memory", "one_liner": "Rebuild a remembered event at retrieval from incomplete traces, learned schemas, present cues, and later information rather than replaying a fixed record, so recall can remain coherent while its details, sources, and timing change.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:reconstructive_memory", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2", "O7"], "guard_type": "TIMING_BINDING", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "new_question_requires_memory_reconstruction", "predicate": "A newly emerged research question requires retrieval and retrospective reconstruction of the prior event history.", "rationale": "The context guard is atomic, anchored in roles already present in the exact record, and fills only the listed guardable obligation gaps."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "reconstructive_memory"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "new_question_requires_memory_reconstruction"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "reconstructive_memory", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P044-C08-U1", "why_it_fits": "One atomic antecedent-to-need qualifier binds the candidate's existing question cue to the complete new-research-question reconstruction branch."}], "publication_role": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT_ONLY", "source_residual_occurrence_id": "r:event_log_centered_modeling:b027_a01_c6", "unit": {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P044-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O4", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O4", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O4", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve a prior history capable of being replayed or reconstructed.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A prior operational, evidentiary, or event history is available as the object of replay or reconstruction.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve the after-relation and the antecedent-to-need direction.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The branch-specific antecedent occurs before and creates the subsequent reconstruction need.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Branches containing O3 must preserve a need to replay recorded prior sequence or state transitions.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Replay of the prior history is needed.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Branches containing O4 must preserve a need to reconstruct what previously occurred.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Retrospective reconstruction of the prior history is needed.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Branches containing O5 must preserve failure as the event that produces the need.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The antecedent is a failure.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Branches containing O6 must preserve change to the governing schema as the event that produces the need.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The antecedent is a schema change.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Branches containing O7 must preserve new research questions as the source of the reconstruction need.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The antecedent is the emergence of new research questions.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Branches containing O8 must preserve disputed conclusions as the source of the reconstruction need.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The antecedent is a dispute over conclusions.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Replay or retrospective reconstruction is needed after failure, schema change, new research questions, or disputed conclusions.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A specified disruption or inquiry change creates a need to replay or retrospectively reconstruct the prior history.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P044-C08-U1"}}]}
{"archetype": {"name": "Event–Narration Order Decoupling", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:event_narration_order_decoupling", "slug": "event_narration_order_decoupling"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 2 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 2}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A case, story, report, explanation, investigation, curriculum, interface, or record contains events whose chronological order is not the best order for presentation. When event order and narration order are not explicitly separated, the presentation can accidentally rewrite the underlying chronology, manufacture false causality, hide omitted context, overstate discovery order, or leave the audience unable to reconstruct what happened. Conversely, forcing presentation to follow chronology can bury the question, overload the audience, weaken explanation, or prevent useful staged disclosure.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A case, story, report, explanation, investigation, curriculum, interface, or record contains events whose chronological order is not the best order for presentation. When event order and narration order are not explicitly separated, the presentation can accidentally rewrite the underlying chronology, manufacture false causality, hide omitted context, overstate discovery order, or leave the audience unable to reconstruct what happened. Conversely, forcing presentation to follow chronology can bury the question, overload the audience, weaken explanation, or prevent useful staged disclosure."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P044-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve an underlying event chronology, not merely an arbitrary item sequence.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A set of events or event-bearing material has an underlying chronological order.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve an audience-facing encounter order over the related material.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Users, readers, learners, investigators, decision-makers, or an equivalent audience encounter the related material in a presentation order.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve the normative 'should' modality and must not require actual adoption of that order.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The focal encounter order is the order the audience should receive, rather than necessarily the order currently used.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail nonidentity of chronology and preferred presentation order.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The preferred encounter order differs from the underlying chronological order of the same material.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Underlying event chronology differs from the order in which an audience should encounter the material.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "The normatively preferred audience encounter order differs from underlying event chronology.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P044-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime makes chronology and telling separable, but the chosen encounter order may still coincide with chronology.", "slug": "fabula_and_syuzhet"}], "residual_id": "r:event_narration_order_decoupling:b027_a02_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b027_a02_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The underlying event chronology differs from the order in which users, readers, learners, investigators, or decision-makers should encounter material. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The underlying event chronology differs from the order in which users, readers, learners, investigators, or decision-makers should encounter material."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime makes chronology and telling separable, but the chosen encounter order may still coincide with chronology.", "slug": "fabula_and_syuzhet"}], "normalized_requirement": "Underlying event chronology differs from the order in which an audience should encounter the material.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Underlying event chronology differs from the order in which an audience should encounter the material.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A narrative can be chronological and causally transparent; narrative structure alone does not entail distortion risk from temporal manipulation.", "slug": "narrative"}], "residual_id": "r:event_narration_order_decoupling:b027_a02_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b027_a02_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Temporal jumps, omitted intervals, retrospective reinterpretation, or multiple timelines could distort perceived causality or responsibility. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Temporal jumps, omitted intervals, retrospective reinterpretation, or multiple timelines could distort perceived causality or responsibility."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A narrative can be chronological and causally transparent; narrative structure alone does not entail distortion risk from temporal manipulation.", "slug": "narrative"}], "normalized_requirement": "Temporal jumps, omissions, reinterpretation, or multiple timelines could distort perceived causality or responsibility.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Temporal jumps, omissions, reinterpretation, or multiple timelines could distort perceived causality or responsibility.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The account uses flashbacks, reverse chronology, nested testimony, staged evidence, reveals, argument-first reporting, or outcome-first explanation.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Conversely, forcing presentation to follow chronology can bury the question, overload the audience, weaken explanation, or prevent useful staged disclosure. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The account uses flashbacks, reverse chronology, nested testimony, staged evidence, reveals, argument-first reporting, or outcome-first explanation. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The account uses flashbacks, reverse chronology, nested testimony, staged evidence, reveals, argument-first reporting, or outcome-first explanation.", "Conversely, forcing presentation to follow chronology can bury the question, overload the audience, weaken explanation, or prevent useful staged disclosure."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "The account uses flashbacks, reverse chronology, nested testimony, staged evidence, reveals, argument-first reporting, or outcome-first explanation."}, {"display_text": "A report must distinguish event order, discovery order, evidence order, argument order, and publication order.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A case, story, report, explanation, investigation, curriculum, interface, or record contains events whose chronological order is not the best order for presentation. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: A report must distinguish event order, discovery order, evidence order, argument order, and publication order. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A report must distinguish event order, discovery order, evidence order, argument order, and publication order.", "A case, story, report, explanation, investigation, curriculum, interface, or record contains events whose chronological order is not the best order for presentation."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "A report must distinguish event order, discovery order, evidence order, argument order, and publication order."}, {"display_text": "The audience needs orientation, suspense, diagnostic focus, explanation, or pedagogy that strict chronology would not provide.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Conversely, forcing presentation to follow chronology can bury the question, overload the audience, weaken explanation, or prevent useful staged disclosure. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: The audience needs orientation, suspense, diagnostic focus, explanation, or pedagogy that strict chronology would not provide. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The audience needs orientation, suspense, diagnostic focus, explanation, or pedagogy that strict chronology would not provide.", "Conversely, forcing presentation to follow chronology can bury the question, overload the audience, weaken explanation, or prevent useful staged disclosure."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The audience needs orientation, suspense, diagnostic focus, explanation, or pedagogy that strict chronology would not provide."}, {"display_text": "The same material must support both an engaging presentation and an auditable chronology.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Truthful chronology and effective presentation are both legitimate objectives, but they optimize for different things. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: The same material must support both an engaging presentation and an auditable chronology. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The same material must support both an engaging presentation and an auditable chronology.", "Truthful chronology and effective presentation are both legitimate objectives, but they optimize for different things."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The same material must support both an engaging presentation and an auditable chronology."}, {"display_text": "Stakeholders may use presentation order strategically to frame blame, innocence, inevitability, novelty, or importance.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A case, story, report, explanation, investigation, curriculum, interface, or record contains events whose chronological order is not the best order for presentation. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Stakeholders may use presentation order strategically to frame blame, innocence, inevitability, novelty, or importance. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders may use presentation order strategically to frame blame, innocence, inevitability, novelty, or importance.", "A case, story, report, explanation, investigation, curriculum, interface, or record contains events whose chronological order is not the best order for presentation."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "Stakeholders may use presentation order strategically to frame blame, innocence, inevitability, novelty, or importance."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 27, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-027", "ledger_sha256": "3e49ce29e847590a4aa13713441637acbc507ba689c972a674428be4fd4ad756"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": [{"groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A story can introduce a capability when it chronologically arises and use it later; this is setup and payoff without encounter order departing from event chronology.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Setup and Payoff", "one_liner": "Place material early that a later development activates, so the payoff feels earned and the setup gains retrospective necessity; the relation requires both precedence and a relevant return.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:setup_and_payoff", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O3"], "guard_type": "TIMING_BINDING", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "nonchronological_setup_placement", "predicate": "The setup's audience placement differs from the underlying chronological position of the represented event or fact.", "rationale": "The context guard is atomic, anchored in roles already present in the exact record, and fills only the listed guardable obligation gaps."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "setup_and_payoff"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "nonchronological_setup_placement"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "setup_and_payoff", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P044-C10-U1", "why_it_fits": "The candidate supplies an authored account and a deliberate audience-order operation. One atomic timing qualifier binds that operation apart from underlying chronology."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Asynchronous code written linearly with async/await would falsify the nesting and inversion obligations and is explicitly excluded from callback hell.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Callback Hell", "one_liner": "The readability collapse that results when a sequential chain of asynchronous steps is written as nested continuation callbacks, so indentation depth grows with step count and the code's textual shape inverts the computation's temporal order.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:callback_hell", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "callback_hell"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "callback_hell", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P044-C10-U1", "why_it_fits": "All three roles and the presentation-versus-temporal-order comparison are constitutive, so the candidate directly grounds the unit."}], "publication_role": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT_ONLY", "source_residual_occurrence_id": "r:event_narration_order_decoupling:b027_a02_c2", "unit": {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P044-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve an account or presentation as the operation's user.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An account, report, explanation, testimony, or equivalent presentation of event-bearing material is focal.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve active deployment of an ordering device by the account, not mere separability in principle.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The account uses a narration or presentation-order operation.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve an order-manipulating or staged-presentation function rather than an unrelated rhetorical device.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The operation stages audience encounter order apart from straightforward underlying event chronology.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "The account uses a nonchronological narration or presentation-order device.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An account deploys an operation that stages encounter order apart from simple event chronology.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P044-C10-U1"}}, {"groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A pre-emptive statement that a speaker lacks expertise can poison the well by framing credibility while attributing no blame.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Poisoning the Well", "one_liner": "Pre-emptively discrediting the source of a forthcoming argument, so an anchoring frame of suspicion is installed first and every later thing the source says is received through it — including any rebuttal, read as defensiveness.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:poisoning_the_well", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O4"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "poisoning_frame_attributes_blame", "predicate": "The pre-emptive discrediting frame attributes blame to the targeted source.", "rationale": "The context guard is atomic, anchored in roles already present in the exact record, and fills only the listed guardable obligation gaps."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "poisoning_the_well"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "poisoning_frame_attributes_blame"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "poisoning_the_well", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P044-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "The candidate directly supplies actor, strategic order, and framing causality. One atomic branch-selection qualifier binds the existing negative frame to blame."}], "publication_role": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT_ONLY", "source_residual_occurrence_id": "r:event_narration_order_decoupling:b027_a02_c7", "unit": {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P044-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve stakeholders who can strategically order the presentation.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Stakeholders with influence over presentation order are the focal actors.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve possibility and must not require that strategic ordering is always or currently occurring.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The stakeholders may, but need not actually, use presentation order strategically.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve presentation order as the framing instrument rather than framing through selection or emphasis alone.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The strategic presentation order is used to frame the branch-specific attribution or salience judgment.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve blame attribution as the framing target.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The framed judgment concerns blame.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve innocence attribution as the framing target.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The framed judgment concerns innocence.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve perceived inevitability as the framing target.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The framed judgment concerns inevitability.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve perceived novelty as the framing target.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The framed judgment concerns novelty.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve perceived importance as the framing target.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The framed judgment concerns importance.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Stakeholders may strategically order presentation to frame blame, innocence, inevitability, novelty, or importance.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Stakeholders may strategically manipulate presentation order to frame a specified attribution or salience judgment.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P044-C11-U1"}}]}
{"archetype": {"name": "Event-Rate Magnitude Encoding", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:event_rate_magnitude_encoding", "slug": "event_rate_magnitude_encoding"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 5, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system needs to convey or infer a continuous, graded, or probabilistic state, but the available carrier is a sequence of discrete, similar events. Without an explicit rate code, observers overreact to isolated events, miss slow changes, confuse noise bursts with magnitude shifts, or choose windows that are too short for precision or too long for timely response.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system needs to convey or infer a continuous, graded, or probabilistic state, but the available carrier is a sequence of discrete, similar events. Without an explicit rate code, observers overreact to isolated events, miss slow changes, confuse noise bursts with magnitude shifts, or choose windows that are too short for precision or too long for timely response."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record begins with a continuous magnitude that must be represented on an event channel.", "role_mapping": "Source quantity -> encoded continuous magnitude.", "slug": "rate_coding", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b027_a03_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The underlying quantity is continuous, graded, probabilistic, or too fine-grained to send as a single categorical event. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The underlying quantity is continuous, graded, probabilistic, or too fine-grained to send as a single categorical event."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Rate Coding", "one_liner": "A continuous magnitude is represented by the frequency of identical discrete events, decoded by integration over a window that trades latency against precision.", "page_ref": "prime:rate_coding", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source quantity -> encoded continuous magnitude.", "slug": "rate_coding", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record begins with a continuous magnitude that must be represented on an event channel."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The source quantity is continuous, graded, probabilistic, or finer than a categorical event.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Every rate code uses amplitude-free fungible unit events, with information in frequency rather than individual event properties.", "role_mapping": "Stereotyped event -> identical channel event.", "slug": "rate_coding", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b027_a03_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The available event unit is stereotyped: a spike, pulse, click, request, alarm, visit, complaint, vote, occurrence, or token whose identity alone carries little magnitude information. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The available event unit is stereotyped: a spike, pulse, click, request, alarm, visit, complaint, vote, occurrence, or token whose identity alone carries little magnitude information."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Rate Coding", "one_liner": "A continuous magnitude is represented by the frequency of identical discrete events, decoded by integration over a window that trades latency against precision.", "page_ref": "prime:rate_coding", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Stereotyped event -> identical channel event.", "slug": "rate_coding", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Every rate code uses amplitude-free fungible unit events, with information in frequency rather than individual event properties."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The carrier consists of stereotyped unit events whose individual identity carries little magnitude information.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The receiver necessarily decodes the hidden magnitude by counting events over a window.", "role_mapping": "Observed count -> integrating decoder; inaccessible magnitude -> encoded source.", "slug": "rate_coding", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b027_a03_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The receiver can observe event timing or count but may not have direct access to the source magnitude. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The receiver can observe event timing or count but may not have direct access to the source magnitude."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Rate Coding", "one_liner": "A continuous magnitude is represented by the frequency of identical discrete events, decoded by integration over a window that trades latency against precision.", "page_ref": "prime:rate_coding", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Observed count -> integrating decoder; inaccessible magnitude -> encoded source.", "slug": "rate_coding", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The receiver necessarily decodes the hidden magnitude by counting events over a window."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The receiver observes event timing or count rather than direct source magnitude.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A single identical event has no magnitude-bearing state, and the exact decoder relies on integration against event-count noise.", "role_mapping": "Single event -> information-poor sample; accumulation -> rate estimate.", "slug": "rate_coding", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b027_a03_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Noise, intermittency, or stochastic arrival patterns make any single event unreliable. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Noise, intermittency, or stochastic arrival patterns make any single event unreliable."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Rate Coding", "one_liner": "A continuous magnitude is represented by the frequency of identical discrete events, decoded by integration over a window that trades latency against precision.", "page_ref": "prime:rate_coding", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Single event -> information-poor sample; accumulation -> rate estimate.", "slug": "rate_coding", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A single identical event has no magnitude-bearing state, and the exact decoder relies on integration against event-count noise."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Stochastic or intermittent arrivals make a single event an unreliable magnitude estimate.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Window length explicitly sets the precision-versus-latency trade-off in every exact instance.", "role_mapping": "Reaction speed -> window latency; confidence -> integrated-count precision.", "slug": "rate_coding", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b027_a03_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The receiver must trade fast reaction against confidence gained by accumulating more events. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The receiver must trade fast reaction against confidence gained by accumulating more events."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Rate Coding", "one_liner": "A continuous magnitude is represented by the frequency of identical discrete events, decoded by integration over a window that trades latency against precision.", "page_ref": "prime:rate_coding", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Reaction speed -> window latency; confidence -> integrated-count precision.", "slug": "rate_coding", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Window length explicitly sets the precision-versus-latency trade-off in every exact instance."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The receiver trades reaction speed against confidence from accumulating more events.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact rate-code record requires an integration window but does not require an upper saturation bound or invisible low-rate regime.", "slug": "rate_coding"}], "residual_id": "r:event_rate_magnitude_encoding:b027_a03_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b027_a03_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The code may saturate when events arrive too quickly or become invisible when events arrive too rarely. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The code may saturate when events arrive too quickly or become invisible when events arrive too rarely."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact rate-code record requires an integration window but does not require an upper saturation bound or invisible low-rate regime.", "slug": "rate_coding"}], "normalized_requirement": "Very high rates can saturate the channel and very low rates can disappear within the decoding window.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Very high rates can saturate the channel and very low rates can disappear within the decoding window.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 27, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-027", "ledger_sha256": "3e49ce29e847590a4aa13713441637acbc507ba689c972a674428be4fd4ad756"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Event-Script Structuring", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:event_script_structuring", "slug": "event_script_structuring"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A person, team, interface, institution, or automated system must interpret a recurring situation but lacks a shared event-sequence model. Participants know fragments of roles, cues, tools, and expected steps, yet the whole situation is tacit, inconsistent, or overgeneralized. As a result, they misread cues, skip expected events, fail to notice breaches, or impose the wrong familiar pattern on a new case.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A person, team, interface, institution, or automated system must interpret a recurring situation but lacks a shared event-sequence model. Participants know fragments of roles, cues, tools, and expected steps, yet the whole situation is tacit, inconsistent, or overgeneralized. As a result, they misread cues, skip expected events, fail to notice breaches, or impose the wrong familiar pattern on a new case."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact script is activated by a familiar recurring situation and contains a temporally ordered sequence bounded by preconditions and termination.", "role_mapping": "Recurring encounter -> triggering situation; beginning-to-end -> ordered script.", "slug": "script", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b027_a04_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The same kind of encounter recurs often enough that participants expect a recognizable beginning, middle, and end. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The same kind of encounter recurs often enough that participants expect a recognizable beginning, middle, and end."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Script", "one_liner": "A stored representation of a familiar situation as a temporally and causally ordered sequence of events with role-slots, props, and conditions, against which encounters are interpreted and deviations detected as breaches.", "page_ref": "prime:script", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Recurring encounter -> triggering situation; beginning-to-end -> ordered script.", "slug": "script", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact script is activated by a familiar recurring situation and contains a temporally ordered sequence bounded by preconditions and termination."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A recurring encounter has a recognizable beginning, middle, and end.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Role slots, props, bracketing conditions, and temporal-causal order are mandatory components of every exact script.", "role_mapping": "Actors -> role slots; context objects -> props; sequence -> ordered steps.", "slug": "script", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b027_a04_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Correct action depends on roles, props, cues, conditions, and event order rather than one isolated rule. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Correct action depends on roles, props, cues, conditions, and event order rather than one isolated rule."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Script", "one_liner": "A stored representation of a familiar situation as a temporally and causally ordered sequence of events with role-slots, props, and conditions, against which encounters are interpreted and deviations detected as breaches.", "page_ref": "prime:script", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Actors -> role slots; context objects -> props; sequence -> ordered steps.", "slug": "script", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Role slots, props, bracketing conditions, and temporal-causal order are mandatory components of every exact script."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Correct action depends jointly on roles, props, cues, conditions, and event order.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P044-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve plural interpreters whose observations and interpretations can be compared.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "At least two people are involved.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must hold the observed facts constant across the people.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The people notice or observe the same factual inputs.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve cross-person difference in expectations rather than different observed evidence.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The people's expectations about the situation differ from one another.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve the tacit status of the divergent expectations.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The differing expectations are tacit rather than fully explicit and jointly examined.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve expectations as interpretive frames applied to the shared factual input.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Each person's tacit expectations shape that person's interpretation of the same facts.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail failure arising from the differing tacit interpretations, not an unrelated failure.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The resulting interpretive mismatch causes a failure.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Failures arise because people notice the same facts but interpret them through different tacit expectations.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "People observing the same facts interpret them through different tacit expectations, causing failure.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P044-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Narrative structure does not require multiple actors to observe identical facts or to fail through incompatible tacit event expectations.", "slug": "narrative"}], "residual_id": "r:event_script_structuring:b027_a04_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b027_a04_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Failures arise because people notice the same facts but interpret them through different tacit expectations. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Failures arise because people notice the same facts but interpret them through different tacit expectations."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Narrative structure does not require multiple actors to observe identical facts or to fail through incompatible tacit event expectations.", "slug": "narrative"}], "normalized_requirement": "People observe the same facts but fail because tacit expectations differ.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "People observe the same facts but fail because tacit expectations differ.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A newcomer, user, learner, model, or cross-functional partner must learn how the situation normally unfolds.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A person, team, interface, institution, or automated system must interpret a recurring situation but lacks a shared event-sequence model. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: A newcomer, user, learner, model, or cross-functional partner must learn how the situation normally unfolds. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A newcomer, user, learner, model, or cross-functional partner must learn how the situation normally unfolds.", "A person, team, interface, institution, or automated system must interpret a recurring situation but lacks a shared event-sequence model."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "A newcomer, user, learner, model, or cross-functional partner must learn how the situation normally unfolds."}, {"display_text": "Safety, fairness, service quality, or coordination requires knowing when the ordinary script has been breached.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: Safety, fairness, service quality, or coordination requires knowing when the ordinary script has been breached. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Safety, fairness, service quality, or coordination requires knowing when the ordinary script has been breached."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Safety, fairness, service quality, or coordination requires knowing when the ordinary script has been breached."}, {"display_text": "The organization wants to preserve useful situated knowledge without freezing it into an inflexible procedure.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: The organization wants to preserve useful situated knowledge without freezing it into an inflexible procedure. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The organization wants to preserve useful situated knowledge without freezing it into an inflexible procedure."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The organization wants to preserve useful situated knowledge without freezing it into an inflexible procedure."}, {"display_text": "A familiar situation has domain, culture, or context variants that need explicit scope boundaries.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: A familiar situation has domain, culture, or context variants that need explicit scope boundaries. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A familiar situation has domain, culture, or context variants that need explicit scope boundaries."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "A familiar situation has domain, culture, or context variants that need explicit scope boundaries."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 27, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-027", "ledger_sha256": "3e49ce29e847590a4aa13713441637acbc507ba689c972a674428be4fd4ad756"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": [{"groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Tried a case with no contextual variation, but without a scope-defeating accidental feature it is not a complete exact instance of the fallacy.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Fallacy of Accident", "one_liner": "The inferential mistake of applying a general rule mechanically to a case that satisfies its terms but lies outside its intended scope — treating a defeasible generalisation, carrying an implicit ceteris paribus clause, as an exceptionless universal.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:fallacy_of_accident", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "fallacy_of_accident"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "fallacy_of_accident", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P044-C13-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every exact instance contrasts the normal case family with a context variant whose difference makes an explicit applicability boundary necessary, satisfying the context branch."}], "publication_role": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT_ONLY", "source_residual_occurrence_id": "r:event_script_structuring:b027_a04_c7", "unit": {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P044-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve variants of the same familiar situation rather than unrelated situations.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "One familiar or recurring situation is the focal situation whose variants are compared.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve variation as the reason explicit applicability boundaries are required.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The branch-specific variation creates a need for explicit boundaries on the situation model's scope of applicability.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve variation across domains.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The familiar situation has domain variants.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve variation across cultures.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The familiar situation has cultural variants.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve variation across contexts.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The familiar situation has contextual variants.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A familiar situation has domain, culture, or context variants requiring explicit scope boundaries.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A familiar situation varies along a specified applicability axis and therefore needs explicit scope boundaries.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P044-C13-U1"}}]}
{"archetype": {"name": "Eventual-Occurrence Containment Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:eventual_occurrence_containment_design", "slug": "eventual_occurrence_containment_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system is judged one opportunity at a time, so a tiny residual probability is treated as practically zero even though the number of requests, cycles, attempts, exposures, or time periods makes occurrence within the operating horizon materially likely. Preventive controls receive most design attention while blast-radius limits, isolation, detection, safe-state behavior, remedy, recovery, and recurrence control remain weak or untested.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system is judged one opportunity at a time, so a tiny residual probability is treated as practically zero even though the number of requests, cycles, attempts, exposures, or time periods makes occurrence within the operating horizon materially likely. Preventive controls receive most design attention while blast-radius limits, isolation, detection, safe-state behavior, remedy, recovery, and recurrence control remain weak or untested."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime requires enough independent or mixing trials for a nonzero outcome probability to compound toward eventual occurrence.", "role_mapping": "Repeated opportunities -> trial-count multiplier.", "slug": "eventual_realisation_of_possibility", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b027_a05_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The same adverse outcome has repeated, numerous, or open-ended opportunities to occur. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The same adverse outcome has repeated, numerous, or open-ended opportunities to occur."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Eventual Realisation of Possibility", "one_liner": "In a system subject to many independent trials, every outcome with non-zero per-trial probability eventually occurs, so design posture shifts from per-trial prevention to containment.", "page_ref": "prime:eventual_realisation_of_possibility", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Repeated opportunities -> trial-count multiplier.", "slug": "eventual_realisation_of_possibility", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime requires enough independent or mixing trials for a nonzero outcome probability to compound toward eventual occurrence."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "An adverse outcome has repeated, numerous, or open-ended opportunities to occur.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Strictly positive per-trial probability is a defining component; inability to establish zero preserves the relevant eventual-occurrence possibility.", "role_mapping": "Residual probability -> nonzero outcome of interest.", "slug": "eventual_realisation_of_possibility", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b027_a05_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The per-opportunity probability is credibly nonzero or cannot be proven zero across the operating envelope. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The per-opportunity probability is credibly nonzero or cannot be proven zero across the operating envelope."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Eventual Realisation of Possibility", "one_liner": "In a system subject to many independent trials, every outcome with non-zero per-trial probability eventually occurs, so design posture shifts from per-trial prevention to containment.", "page_ref": "prime:eventual_realisation_of_possibility", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Residual probability -> nonzero outcome of interest.", "slug": "eventual_realisation_of_possibility", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Strictly positive per-trial probability is a defining component; inability to establish zero preserves the relevant eventual-occurrence possibility."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The per-opportunity probability is nonzero or cannot be established as zero across the operating envelope.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Risk requires probability-weighted adverse outcomes but need not cross any materiality, irreversibility, systemic, or ethical threshold.", "slug": "risk"}], "residual_id": "r:eventual_occurrence_containment_design:b027_a05_c3", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b027_a05_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The consequence of at least one occurrence is material, irreversible, systemic, or ethically significant. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The consequence of at least one occurrence is material, irreversible, systemic, or ethically significant."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Risk requires probability-weighted adverse outcomes but need not cross any materiality, irreversibility, systemic, or ethical threshold.", "slug": "risk"}], "normalized_requirement": "At least one occurrence would have material, irreversible, systemic, or ethical consequence.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "At least one occurrence would have material, irreversible, systemic, or ethical consequence.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Opportunity volume, asset concentration, or exposure duration is growing faster than the risk model is refreshed.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Per-opportunity prevention can make an event rare, but repeated exposure can make at least one occurrence foreseeable. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Opportunity volume, asset concentration, or exposure duration is growing faster than the risk model is refreshed. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Opportunity volume, asset concentration, or exposure duration is growing faster than the risk model is refreshed.", "Per-opportunity prevention can make an event rare, but repeated exposure can make at least one occurrence foreseeable."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Opportunity volume, asset concentration, or exposure duration is growing faster than the risk model is refreshed."}, {"display_text": "Containment, isolation, safe-state entry, recovery, or exposure reduction can materially change total harm.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Preventive controls receive most design attention while blast-radius limits, isolation, detection, safe-state behavior, remedy, recovery, and recurrence control remain weak or untested. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: Containment, isolation, safe-state entry, recovery, or exposure reduction can materially change total harm. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Containment, isolation, safe-state entry, recovery, or exposure reduction can materially change total harm.", "Preventive controls receive most design attention while blast-radius limits, isolation, detection, safe-state behavior, remedy, recovery, and recurrence control remain weak or untested."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Containment, isolation, safe-state entry, recovery, or exposure reduction can materially change total harm."}, {"display_text": "A quiet history is being used as evidence that the hazard has disappeared rather than as one observation under limited exposure.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: A quiet history is being used as evidence that the hazard has disappeared rather than as one observation under limited exposure. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A quiet history is being used as evidence that the hazard has disappeared rather than as one observation under limited exposure."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "A quiet history is being used as evidence that the hazard has disappeared rather than as one observation under limited exposure."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 27, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-027", "ledger_sha256": "3e49ce29e847590a4aa13713441637acbc507ba689c972a674428be4fd4ad756"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Evidence-Bound Authentication", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:evidence_bound_authentication", "slug": "evidence_bound_authentication"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 6, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 6, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "6 of 7 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 7}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system must decide whether to trust, admit, weigh, route, or act on a claim about who or what something is, where it came from, who committed to it, or whether it is the same source previously known. Names, labels, accounts, credentials, documents, signatures, custody records, and metadata can be copied, forged, stale, misbound, misrouted, or true only for a narrower scope. Without an authentication archetype, downstream access and trust decisions treat assertions as facts, while provenance reviews, authorization rules, and general screening processes compensate too late or answer a different question.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system must decide whether to trust, admit, weigh, route, or act on a claim about who or what something is, where it came from, who committed to it, or whether it is the same source previously known. Names, labels, accounts, credentials, documents, signatures, custody records, and metadata can be copied, forged, stale, misbound, misrouted, or true only for a narrower scope. Without an authentication archetype, downstream access and trust decisions treat assertions as facts, while provenance reviews, authorization rules, and general screening processes compensate too late or answer a different question."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "An asserted identity or origin is the first mandatory role in the exact authentication structure.", "role_mapping": "Presented claim -> asserted identity or origin.", "slug": "authentication", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b027_a06_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A request, object, record, message, artifact, account, actor, device, source, or credential presents an identity or origin claim. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A request, object, record, message, artifact, account, actor, device, source, or credential presents an identity or origin claim."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Authentication", "one_liner": "Binding an asserted identity or origin to admissible evidence through a procedure that yields a verdict, before trust, access, or weight is granted.", "page_ref": "prime:authentication", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Presented claim -> asserted identity or origin.", "slug": "authentication", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "An asserted identity or origin is the first mandatory role in the exact authentication structure."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "An actor, account, object, record, message, source, or credential asserts identity or origin.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact verdict licenses downstream trust, access, or evidentiary weight for a bounded window.", "role_mapping": "Dependent action -> downstream use of binding verdict.", "slug": "authentication", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b027_a06_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A later action depends on the claim: access, weight, responsibility, custody, privilege, publication, payment, acceptance, or attribution. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A later action depends on the claim: access, weight, responsibility, custody, privilege, publication, payment, acceptance, or attribution."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Authentication", "one_liner": "Binding an asserted identity or origin to admissible evidence through a procedure that yields a verdict, before trust, access, or weight is granted.", "page_ref": "prime:authentication", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Dependent action -> downstream use of binding verdict.", "slug": "authentication", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact verdict licenses downstream trust, access, or evidentiary weight for a bounded window."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A downstream access, weight, responsibility, custody, payment, acceptance, or attribution decision depends on the claim.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Every authentication procedure is defined against imposture classes and includes a freshness condition resisting replay or stale evidence.", "role_mapping": "Imitation or replay -> threat model and freshness failure.", "slug": "authentication", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b027_a06_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Names, labels, accounts, credentials, documents, signatures, custody records, and metadata can be copied, forged, stale, misbound, misrouted, or true only for a narrower scope. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The claim can be imitated, replayed, substituted, stolen, forged, stale, delegated, or confused with a nearby entity.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The claim can be imitated, replayed, substituted, stolen, forged, stale, delegated, or confused with a nearby entity.", "Names, labels, accounts, credentials, documents, signatures, custody records, and metadata can be copied, forged, stale, misbound, misrouted, or true only for a narrower scope."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Authentication", "one_liner": "Binding an asserted identity or origin to admissible evidence through a procedure that yields a verdict, before trust, access, or weight is granted.", "page_ref": "prime:authentication", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Imitation or replay -> threat model and freshness failure.", "slug": "authentication", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Every authentication procedure is defined against imposture classes and includes a freshness condition resisting replay or stale evidence."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The claim can be imitated, replayed, substituted, stolen, forged, stale, delegated, or confused with a nearby entity.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A verification procedure over admissible identity evidence is mandatory and produces the binding verdict.", "role_mapping": "Evidence check -> authentication procedure.", "slug": "authentication", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b027_a06_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Evidence can be gathered or checked through a repeatable procedure rather than accepted solely by reputation or assertion. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Evidence can be gathered or checked through a repeatable procedure rather than accepted solely by reputation or assertion."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Authentication", "one_liner": "Binding an asserted identity or origin to admissible evidence through a procedure that yields a verdict, before trust, access, or weight is granted.", "page_ref": "prime:authentication", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Evidence check -> authentication procedure.", "slug": "authentication", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A verification procedure over admissible identity evidence is mandatory and produces the binding verdict."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Admissible evidence can be checked through a repeatable procedure rather than accepted by assertion alone.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Authentication has possible false verdicts but does not require all four listed normative and operational considerations to determine the threshold.", "slug": "authentication"}], "residual_id": "r:evidence_bound_authentication:b027_a06_c5", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b027_a06_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: False acceptance and false rejection both matter, and the correct balance depends on risk, burden, fairness, and privacy. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["False acceptance and false rejection both matter, and the correct balance depends on risk, burden, fairness, and privacy."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Authentication has possible false verdicts but does not require all four listed normative and operational considerations to determine the threshold.", "slug": "authentication"}], "normalized_requirement": "False acceptance and rejection both matter, with balance governed by risk, burden, fairness, and privacy.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "False acceptance and rejection both matter, with balance governed by risk, burden, fairness, and privacy.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact structure includes a trust anchor, a freshness condition, and a downstream trust window rather than an unbounded global identity label.", "role_mapping": "Verdict scope -> anchor, freshness, and bounded trust window.", "slug": "authentication", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b027_a06_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The verdict must be scoped by time, capability, context, chain of custody, trust anchor, or assurance level. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The verdict must be scoped by time, capability, context, chain of custody, trust anchor, or assurance level."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Authentication", "one_liner": "Binding an asserted identity or origin to admissible evidence through a procedure that yields a verdict, before trust, access, or weight is granted.", "page_ref": "prime:authentication", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Verdict scope -> anchor, freshness, and bounded trust window.", "slug": "authentication", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact structure includes a trust anchor, a freshness condition, and a downstream trust window rather than an unbounded global identity label."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The verdict is scoped by freshness, capability, context, custody, trust anchor, or assurance level.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The binding verdict is explicitly the decision state that licenses or blocks downstream action.", "role_mapping": "Decision state -> binding accepted or rejected verdict.", "slug": "authentication", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b027_a06_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A downstream system needs a machine-readable or institutionally legible decision state before proceeding. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A downstream system needs a machine-readable or institutionally legible decision state before proceeding."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Authentication", "one_liner": "Binding an asserted identity or origin to admissible evidence through a procedure that yields a verdict, before trust, access, or weight is granted.", "page_ref": "prime:authentication", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Decision state -> binding accepted or rejected verdict.", "slug": "authentication", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The binding verdict is explicitly the decision state that licenses or blocks downstream action."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A legible decision state is required before a downstream system proceeds.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 27, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-027", "ledger_sha256": "3e49ce29e847590a4aa13713441637acbc507ba689c972a674428be4fd4ad756"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Evidence-Bounded Trust Governance", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:evidence_bounded_trust_governance", "slug": "evidence_bounded_trust_governance"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Global labels collapse different behaviors, stakes, evidence, contexts, and power relationships. A skilled clinician may not be reliable about billing; a reliable supplier may lack surge capacity; a well-calibrated model on one population may fail after drift; a caring colleague may lack authority. Halo and stigma transfer one observation across domains.\n\nEvidence is also asymmetric. Status, credentials, charisma, reputation, dashboards, references, and compliant behavior can be relevant while remaining incomplete, stale, adversarially produced, or shaped by unequal opportunity. Powerful trustees often define what counts as evidence and impose monitoring on weaker trustors. People with fewer alternatives bear larger exposure for the same nominal arrangement.\n\nWithout an explicit envelope, trust expands silently through delegation, scope creep, automation, convenience, and dependency. Monitoring can create a false sense of certainty while incentives change off-screen. After breach, institutions may conceal warnings to protect reputation or rush reconciliation to restore operations. The structural challenge is enabling useful reliance without blind faith, coercive control, or irreversible dependence.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Cooperation requires reliance before behavior can be fully observed, but parties face unequal information, unequal exposure, uncertain intent, and changing capability. Global trust labels produce either excessive vulnerability or defensive control, while one good or bad episode spills across domains."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Trust is forward-looking reliance on another party's future behavior under incomplete monitoring.", "role_mapping": "Acting party -> trustor; unknown behavior -> trustee's future conduct.", "slug": "trust", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b027_a07_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A party must act before another's future behavior is known. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A party must act before another's future behavior is known"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Trust", "one_liner": "Willingly accepting vulnerability to another party's future behavior under incomplete monitoring, based on positive expectations about their competence and intentions.", "page_ref": "prime:trust", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Acting party -> trustor; unknown behavior -> trustee's future conduct.", "slug": "trust", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Trust is forward-looking reliance on another party's future behavior under incomplete monitoring."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A party must act before another party's future behavior is known.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Trust requires incomplete monitoring, but monitoring can be merely costly or intentionally partial rather than impossible or harmful.", "slug": "trust"}], "residual_id": "r:evidence_bounded_trust_governance:b027_a07_c2", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b027_a07_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Continuous monitoring is impossible or harmful. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Continuous monitoring is impossible or harmful"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Trust requires incomplete monitoring, but monitoring can be merely costly or intentionally partial rather than impossible or harmful.", "slug": "trust"}], "normalized_requirement": "Continuous monitoring is impossible or harmful.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Continuous monitoring is impossible or harmful.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Willing acceptance of vulnerability to a trustee is the defining relation of trust.", "role_mapping": "Cooperation -> reliance; exposure -> vulnerability.", "slug": "trust", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b027_a07_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Cooperation creates meaningful exposure. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Cooperation creates meaningful exposure"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Trust", "one_liner": "Willingly accepting vulnerability to another party's future behavior under incomplete monitoring, based on positive expectations about their competence and intentions.", "page_ref": "prime:trust", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Cooperation -> reliance; exposure -> vulnerability.", "slug": "trust", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Willing acceptance of vulnerability to a trustee is the defining relation of trust."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Cooperation exposes one party to meaningful loss from another's behavior.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Reputation or signals are incomplete.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Status, credentials, charisma, reputation, dashboards, references, and compliant behavior can be relevant while remaining incomplete, stale, adversarially produced, or shaped by unequal opportunity. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Reputation or signals are incomplete. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Reputation or signals are incomplete", "Status, credentials, charisma, reputation, dashboards, references, and compliant behavior can be relevant while remaining incomplete, stale, adversarially produced, or shaped by unequal opportunity."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Reputation or signals are incomplete"}, {"display_text": "A breach or major change requires recalibration.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: A breach or major change requires recalibration. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A breach or major change requires recalibration"]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "A breach or major change requires recalibration"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 27, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-027", "ledger_sha256": "3e49ce29e847590a4aa13713441637acbc507ba689c972a674428be4fd4ad756"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Evidence-Grounded Persona Proxy Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:evidence_grounded_persona_proxy_design", "slug": "evidence_grounded_persona_proxy_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Teams need to design, communicate, or decide for a population whose needs, constraints, behaviors, and contexts are too numerous or uncertain to hold in working memory. Without a bounded proxy, decisions drift toward the loudest stakeholder, the designer’s self-image, abstract averages, raw demographics, or no user representation at all. With an ungoverned proxy, decisions drift toward stereotype, false representativeness, and reified fiction.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Teams need to design, communicate, or decide for a population whose needs, constraints, behaviors, and contexts are too numerous or uncertain to hold in working memory. Without a bounded proxy, decisions drift toward the loudest stakeholder, the designer’s self-image, abstract averages, raw demographics, or no user representation at all. With an ungoverned proxy, decisions drift toward stereotype, false representativeness, and reified fiction."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact persona starts with a broad heterogeneous partially unknown population too unwieldy to reason about directly.", "role_mapping": "Population -> target population; reasoning limit -> coverage-for-traction pressure.", "slug": "persona", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b027_a08_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Population too complex for direct reasoning. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Population too complex for direct reasoning"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Persona", "one_liner": "A synthesized, named, concrete archetype that stands in for an unwieldy population during reasoning under uncertainty, trading coverage for cognitive traction.", "page_ref": "prime:persona", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Population -> target population; reasoning limit -> coverage-for-traction pressure.", "slug": "persona", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact persona starts with a broad heterogeneous partially unknown population too unwieldy to reason about directly."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The target population is too broad, heterogeneous, or uncertain for direct working-memory reasoning.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A named concrete composite archetype supplies the cognitive traction that defines a persona.", "role_mapping": "Concrete aid -> named composite archetype.", "slug": "persona", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b027_a08_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Concrete reasoning aid needed. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Concrete reasoning aid needed"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Persona", "one_liner": "A synthesized, named, concrete archetype that stands in for an unwieldy population during reasoning under uncertainty, trading coverage for cognitive traction.", "page_ref": "prime:persona", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Concrete aid -> named composite archetype.", "slug": "persona", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A named concrete composite archetype supplies the cognitive traction that defines a persona."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Decision-makers need a concrete, cognitively manipulable stand-in for the population.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P045-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve existing relevant evidence rather than an evidence-free setting.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Relevant evidence about the focal population already exists.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must contain a decision context that needs the population evidence.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A receiving context must make, communicate, or support a decision about that population.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must connect the evidence to a concrete failure of decision portability.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The existing evidence cannot be directly represented, transferred, or applied in the receiving decision context.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must retain the negative portability result despite evidence relevance.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Relevance alone does not make the evidence usable in that context.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Relevant evidence about a population exists but cannot be carried into a form usable in the focal decision context.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Relevant population evidence is not portable into a decision context.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P045-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A persona can be constructed where population knowledge is sparse; existing-but-nonportable evidence is not mandatory.", "slug": "persona"}], "residual_id": "r:evidence_grounded_persona_proxy_design:b027_a08_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b027_a08_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Evidence exists but is not decision-portable. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Evidence exists but is not decision-portable"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A persona can be constructed where population knowledge is sparse; existing-but-nonportable evidence is not mandatory.", "slug": "persona"}], "normalized_requirement": "Relevant evidence exists but is not portable into the decision context.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Relevant evidence exists but is not portable into the decision context.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Uncertainty can be immaterial to the pending decision, and the general prime does not entail a population proxy.", "slug": "uncertainty"}], "residual_id": "r:evidence_grounded_persona_proxy_design:b027_a08_c4", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b027_a08_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Uncertainty and omission are material. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Uncertainty and omission are material"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Uncertainty can be immaterial to the pending decision, and the general prime does not entail a population proxy.", "slug": "uncertainty"}], "normalized_requirement": "Uncertainty and omission in the population proxy are material to the decision.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Uncertainty and omission in the population proxy are material to the decision.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Stakeholder power asymmetry matters.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Stakeholder power asymmetry matters. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Stakeholder power asymmetry matters"]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Stakeholder power asymmetry matters"}, {"display_text": "Persona use will affect design consequences.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Persona use will affect design consequences. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Persona use will affect design consequences"]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Persona use will affect design consequences"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 27, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-027", "ledger_sha256": "3e49ce29e847590a4aa13713441637acbc507ba689c972a674428be4fd4ad756"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": [{"groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "The apparent counterexample omits the emitted context qualifier; after enforcing that single atomic predicate, no complete candidate instance can falsify a unit obligation.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Publication Bias", "one_liner": "A scientific record becomes systematically unrepresentative when the probability that a study, result, or outcome becomes publicly available depends on its direction, magnitude, statistical significance, novelty, or sponsor-favoredness.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:publication_bias", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "visibility_gate_controller_has_greater_selection_power", "predicate": "The visibility gate is controlled by a stakeholder with greater evidence-selection power than the affected stakeholder audience.", "rationale": "Every complete exact-record instance together with the single emitted qualifier satisfies one complete DNF branch without adding an unanchored role or relation."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "publication_bias"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The visibility gate is controlled by a stakeholder with greater evidence-selection power than the affected stakeholder audience."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "publication_bias", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P045-C04-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent third-reader exact-record review confirms this disposition. GUARDED_CONTEXT. Result-dependent visibility selects a population record, with sponsor or institutional gate control providing the guarded power-asymmetry context. The emitted candidate-anchored qualifier fills every and only guardable gap."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Counterexample search found none: every complete exact-record instance preserves the mapped roles, relation, polarity, modality, and at least one complete required DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Cherry Picking", "one_liner": "Selectively presenting confirming evidence while suppressing disconfirming evidence from the same available population, so the offered sample gives an impression the full distribution would not support — locating the dishonesty in the selection process, not the individual data points.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:cherry_picking", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "cherry_picking"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "cherry_picking", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P045-C04-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent third-reader exact-record review confirms this disposition. DIRECT. The deliberate presenter controls population-evidence selection while the rule-blind audience lacks that control, directly instantiating unequal selection power and bias. No additional contextual fact or interpretive bridge is required."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "The apparent counterexample omits the emitted context qualifier; after enforcing that single atomic predicate, no complete candidate instance can falsify a unit obligation.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Propaganda Model", "one_liner": "Explain patterned media bias structurally rather than by motive — five institutional filters (ownership, advertising, sourcing, flak, ideological premise) shape every story before publication, so the slant is a property of the constraints, not anyone's intent.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:propaganda_model", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "public_coverage_is_focal_population_proxy", "predicate": "The public coverage output is used as the population-representing proxy in the focal decision.", "rationale": "Every complete exact-record instance together with the single emitted qualifier satisfies one complete DNF branch without adding an unanchored role or relation."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "propaganda_model"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The public coverage output is used as the population-representing proxy in the focal decision."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "propaganda_model", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P045-C04-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent third-reader exact-record review confirms this disposition. GUARDED_CONTEXT. Institutional power filters systematically select the story population that becomes public coverage; the guarded context binds that coverage output to use as the focal population proxy. The emitted candidate-anchored qualifier fills every and only guardable gap."}], "publication_role": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT_ONLY", "source_residual_occurrence_id": "r:evidence_grounded_persona_proxy_design:b027_a08_c5", "unit": {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P045-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must contain unequal stakeholder power rather than stakeholder plurality alone.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Stakeholders differ in their power over the decision or proxy-construction process.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must include evidence selection for a population-representing proxy.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Population evidence is selected or weighted in constructing a proxy.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve the direction from power inequality to evidence-selection bias.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The power asymmetry can affect which evidence shapes the proxy.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve the source's can modality rather than require actual bias.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Bias is possible but is not asserted to occur in every case.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "Unequal power among stakeholders can bias which population evidence is selected to shape a decision proxy.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Stakeholder power asymmetry can bias evidence selection for a population proxy.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P045-C04-U1"}}]}
{"archetype": {"name": "Evidentiary Trace Warranting", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:evidentiary_trace_warranting", "slug": "evidentiary_trace_warranting"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 3, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 3, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 3 of 3 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "People and systems often treat observations, sources, measurements, citations, examples, or records as self-evident proof. The link between the trace and the claim remains implicit, so reviewers cannot tell what exactly was observed, where it came from, what hypothesis it bears on, why it is relevant, how strong it is, what could defeat it, or when it should be revised.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "People and systems often treat observations, sources, measurements, citations, examples, or records as self-evident proof. The link between the trace and the claim remains implicit, so reviewers cannot tell what exactly was observed, where it came from, what hypothesis it bears on, why it is relevant, how strong it is, what could defeat it, or when it should be revised."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Evidence is exactly a trace that bears defeasibly on a specified unobservable hypothesis through an inference rule.", "role_mapping": "Trace -> observable; claim -> target hypothesis; support -> evidentiary relation.", "slug": "evidence", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b027_a09_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The archetype begins where an observation is asked to do evidentiary work. In this condition set, the requirement is: An observable trace is used to support, weaken, or discriminate among hypotheses.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A trace is being used to support, weaken, or discriminate between hypotheses."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Evidence", "one_liner": "A defeasible, provenance-bearing relation between an observable trace and a hypothesis about an unobservable state.", "page_ref": "prime:evidence", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Trace -> observable; claim -> target hypothesis; support -> evidentiary relation.", "slug": "evidence", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Evidence is exactly a trace that bears defeasibly on a specified unobservable hypothesis through an inference rule."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "An observable trace is used to support, weaken, or discriminate among hypotheses.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Defeaters and alternative trace-generating mechanisms are mandatory parts of the exact evidence relation.", "role_mapping": "Alternative explanation -> defeater or competing generator.", "slug": "evidence", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b027_a09_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Rival hypotheses and discriminating relevance must be explicit. In this condition set, the requirement is: The same trace admits alternative explanations or defeaters.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The same trace could support multiple explanations."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Evidence", "one_liner": "A defeasible, provenance-bearing relation between an observable trace and a hypothesis about an unobservable state.", "page_ref": "prime:evidence", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Alternative explanation -> defeater or competing generator.", "slug": "evidence", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Defeaters and alternative trace-generating mechanisms are mandatory parts of the exact evidence relation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The same trace admits alternative explanations or defeaters.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Evidence is exactly a trace that bears defeasibly on a specified unobservable hypothesis through an inference rule.", "role_mapping": "Trace -> observable; claim -> target hypothesis; support -> evidentiary relation.", "slug": "evidence", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b027_a09_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The archetype begins where an observation is asked to do evidentiary work. In this condition set, the requirement is: An observable trace is used to support, weaken, or discriminate among hypotheses.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A trace is being used to support, weaken, or discriminate between hypotheses."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Evidence", "one_liner": "A defeasible, provenance-bearing relation between an observable trace and a hypothesis about an unobservable state.", "page_ref": "prime:evidence", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Trace -> observable; claim -> target hypothesis; support -> evidentiary relation.", "slug": "evidence", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Evidence is exactly a trace that bears defeasibly on a specified unobservable hypothesis through an inference rule."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "An observable trace is used to support, weaken, or discriminate among hypotheses.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Every instance contains a true state, a measurement apparatus with noise sources, and an observed state that can deviate.", "role_mapping": "Source or sensor reading -> observed state; noise -> apparatus limit.", "slug": "measurement_uncertainty", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b027_a09_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Provenance and quality checks are essential. In this condition set, the requirement is: A measurement or observation is noisy because apparatus or observation limits separate observed from true state.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A source, measurement, record, testimony, or sensor reading may be noisy, biased, incomplete, tampered with, or context-dependent."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Measurement Uncertainty and Observational Noise", "one_liner": "Measurement noise arises from instrument and observation limits.", "page_ref": "prime:measurement_uncertainty", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source or sensor reading -> observed state; noise -> apparatus limit.", "slug": "measurement_uncertainty", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Every instance contains a true state, a measurement apparatus with noise sources, and an observed state that can deviate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A measurement or observation is noisy because apparatus or observation limits separate observed from true state.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Evidence is exactly a trace that bears defeasibly on a specified unobservable hypothesis through an inference rule.", "role_mapping": "Trace -> observable; claim -> target hypothesis; support -> evidentiary relation.", "slug": "evidence", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b027_a09_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The archetype begins where an observation is asked to do evidentiary work. In this condition set, the requirement is: An observable trace is used to support, weaken, or discriminate among hypotheses.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A trace is being used to support, weaken, or discriminate between hypotheses."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Evidence", "one_liner": "A defeasible, provenance-bearing relation between an observable trace and a hypothesis about an unobservable state.", "page_ref": "prime:evidence", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Trace -> observable; claim -> target hypothesis; support -> evidentiary relation.", "slug": "evidence", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Evidence is exactly a trace that bears defeasibly on a specified unobservable hypothesis through an inference rule."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "An observable trace is used to support, weaken, or discriminate among hypotheses.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires an aggregation rule that combines multiple traces while accounting for dependence.", "role_mapping": "Accumulated sources -> multiple traces; weighing -> aggregation rule.", "slug": "evidence", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b027_a09_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Each item needs a common relation structure before aggregation. In this condition set, the requirement is: Multiple traces are accumulated, weighed, or compared across sources.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Evidence is being accumulated, weighed, or compared across sources."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Evidence", "one_liner": "A defeasible, provenance-bearing relation between an observable trace and a hypothesis about an unobservable state.", "page_ref": "prime:evidence", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Accumulated sources -> multiple traces; weighing -> aggregation rule.", "slug": "evidence", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires an aggregation rule that combines multiple traces while accounting for dependence."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Multiple traces are accumulated, weighed, or compared across sources.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A claim will travel into decisions, publications, dashboards, legal records, diagnoses, or automated systems.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The evidence relation needs to survive handoff rather than being flattened into a label. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: A claim will travel into decisions, publications, dashboards, legal records, diagnoses, or automated systems. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A claim will travel into decisions, publications, dashboards, legal records, diagnoses, or automated systems.", "The evidence relation needs to survive handoff rather than being flattened into a label."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "A claim will travel into decisions, publications, dashboards, legal records, diagnoses, or automated systems."}, {"display_text": "The cost of overclaiming or underclaiming support is high.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "High-stakes contexts need explicit defeaters, scope, and update triggers. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The cost of overclaiming or underclaiming support is high. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The cost of overclaiming or underclaiming support is high.", "High-stakes contexts need explicit defeaters, scope, and update triggers."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The cost of overclaiming or underclaiming support is high."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 27, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-027", "ledger_sha256": "3e49ce29e847590a4aa13713441637acbc507ba689c972a674428be4fd4ad756"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Exaptive Function Redeployment", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:exaptive_function_redeployment", "slug": "exaptive_function_redeployment"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 6, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 3, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 3 of 6 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system has an existing feature, structure, role, convention, interface, practice, or artifact that appears capable of serving a new function. Because the feature did not originate for that function, its apparent usefulness may conceal mismatched assumptions, inherited side effects, legitimacy problems, brittle dependencies, or conflicts with its original use. Without explicit governance, the system either misses valuable latent capacity or repurposes a feature in a way that fails under load, creates hidden coupling, or rewrites history to pretend the new function was always intended.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system has an existing feature, structure, role, convention, interface, practice, or artifact that appears capable of serving a new function. Because the feature did not originate for that function, its apparent usefulness may conceal mismatched assumptions, inherited side effects, legitimacy problems, brittle dependencies, or conflicts with its original use. Without explicit governance, the system either misses valuable latent capacity or repurposes a feature in a way that fails under load, creates hidden coupling, or rewrites history to pretend the new function was always intended."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Exaptation is agnostic about quality and explicitly need not outperform a purpose-built design.", "slug": "exaptation"}], "residual_id": "r:exaptive_function_redeployment:b027_a10_c1", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b027_a10_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source of value is discovered affordance rather than original intent. In this condition set, the requirement is: A legacy feature solves a new problem better than a purpose-built alternative.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A legacy feature, practice, or structure begins to solve a new problem better than a purpose-built alternative."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Exaptation is agnostic about quality and explicitly need not outperform a purpose-built design.", "slug": "exaptation"}], "normalized_requirement": "A legacy feature solves a new problem better than a purpose-built alternative.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A legacy feature solves a new problem better than a purpose-built alternative.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The defining transition is discovery and co-option of a pre-existing structure for a use it was not designed to serve.", "role_mapping": "Existing feature -> pre-existing structure; new use -> co-opted function.", "slug": "exaptation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b027_a10_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "User innovation may reveal a real affordance that the official design model misses. In this condition set, the requirement is: Users or environments appropriate an existing feature for an unanticipated function.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Users or environments appropriate a tool, interface, symbol, or practice for a use designers did not anticipate."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Exaptation", "one_liner": "A feature co-opted for a function other than the one it arose for.", "page_ref": "prime:exaptation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Existing feature -> pre-existing structure; new use -> co-opted function.", "slug": "exaptation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The defining transition is discovery and co-option of a pre-existing structure for a use it was not designed to serve."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Users or environments appropriate an existing feature for an unanticipated function.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Every exact instance separates a structure's origin function from the later function for which it is co-opted.", "role_mapping": "Prior context -> origin role; later context -> new function.", "slug": "exaptation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b027_a10_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The intervention needs a lineage/function distinction, not just ordinary adaptation. In this condition set, the requirement is: A biological, cultural, linguistic, institutional, or technical feature changes function across contexts.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A biological, cultural, linguistic, institutional, or technical feature changes function across contexts."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Exaptation", "one_liner": "A feature co-opted for a function other than the one it arose for.", "page_ref": "prime:exaptation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Prior context -> origin role; later context -> new function.", "slug": "exaptation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Every exact instance separates a structure's origin function from the later function for which it is co-opted."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A biological, cultural, linguistic, institutional, or technical feature changes function across contexts.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A standing capacity can manifest only in its original function and need not be redirected to a new function.", "slug": "latent_realizable_capacity"}], "residual_id": "r:exaptive_function_redeployment:b027_a10_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b027_a10_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Useful redundancy can become a platform for new function. In this condition set, the requirement is: A component has spare capacity, redundant function, or a latent service bundle available for redirection.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A component has spare capacity, redundant function, or a latent service bundle that can be redirected."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A standing capacity can manifest only in its original function and need not be redirected to a new function.", "slug": "latent_realizable_capacity"}], "normalized_requirement": "A component has spare capacity, redundant function, or a latent service bundle available for redirection.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A component has spare capacity, redundant function, or a latent service bundle available for redirection.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B5", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P045-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must contain both the new problem and an already-existing solution.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A new problem and a pre-existing solution are the two sides of the comparison.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve partial similarity rather than identity or total mismatch.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The new problem shares only partial structure with the existing solution.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must include a contextual mismatch in addition to the partial match.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The new problem differs from the solution's original context on at least one load-bearing dimension.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfying this branch must make the relevant mismatch one of stakes.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "In one branch, the stakes differ.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfying this branch must make the relevant mismatch one of scale.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "In one branch, the scale differs.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfying this branch must make the relevant mismatch one of involved actors.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "In one branch, the actors differ.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfying this branch must make the relevant mismatch one of environment.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "In one branch, the environment differs.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A new problem shares only part of the structure addressed by an existing solution and differs from it in stakes, scale, actors, or environment.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A new problem partially matches an existing solution while differing on a load-bearing contextual dimension.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P045-C05-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Exaptation requires reuse of a pre-existing structure for a new function, not merely analogical similarity between a problem and a solution.", "slug": "exaptation"}], "residual_id": "r:exaptive_function_redeployment:b027_a10_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b027_a10_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Exaptation is tempting but negative transfer and mismatch are possible. In this condition set, the requirement is: A new problem partially resembles an existing solution but differs in stakes, scale, actors, or environment.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A new problem shares partial structure with an existing solution but differs in stakes, scale, actors, or environment."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Tried a scale-mismatch instance with no partial fit, but the exact anti-pattern requires the familiar tool to be selected and a delivered solution to result, albeit one inferior to a fit-appropriate alternative.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Golden Hammer Anti-Pattern", "one_liner": "Diagnose a team applying its familiar technology to a poorly-fitting problem because the acquisition cost of an alternative is visible while the misfit cost is diffuse and downstream, so fluency reshapes what counts as the right tool before fit is ever asked.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:golden_hammer_anti_pattern", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O5"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "incumbent_problem_scale_mismatch", "predicate": "The incumbent technology fits the new problem poorly because their operating scales differ.", "rationale": "Every complete exact-record instance together with the single emitted qualifier satisfies one complete DNF branch without adding an unanchored role or relation."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "golden_hammer_anti_pattern"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The incumbent technology fits the new problem poorly because their operating scales differ."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "golden_hammer_anti_pattern", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P045-C05-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent third-reader exact-record review confirms this disposition. The exact record supplies the comparison spine, and one candidate-anchored scale branch completes the source disjunction."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Tried an ecosystem-mismatch instance with no partial fit or environmental difference, but the exact construct requires a technically sound artifact blocked specifically by a differing deployment context and missing complement.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Ecosystem Mismatch", "one_liner": "Explain why a technically sound innovation stalls on deployment not by a flaw in the artifact but by the absence of one specific complementary asset its operating context tacitly required — leaving it complete-but-functionally-blocked.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:ecosystem_mismatch", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "ecosystem_mismatch"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "ecosystem_mismatch", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P045-C05-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent third-reader exact-record review confirms this disposition. Every exact instance satisfies the environment branch: an existing sound solution partly fits a new deployment but its surrounding operating environment lacks a necessary complement."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A new problem partially resembles an existing solution but differs in stakes, scale, actors, or environment.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 5", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B6", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Co-option often adds a function but the exact prime does not require the original function to remain active.", "slug": "exaptation"}], "residual_id": "r:exaptive_function_redeployment:b027_a10_c7", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b027_a10_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Dual-function compatibility becomes a central design issue. In this condition set, the requirement is: The original function remains active while a new function is introduced.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The original function remains active while the new function is introduced."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Co-option often adds a function but the exact prime does not require the original function to remain active.", "slug": "exaptation"}], "normalized_requirement": "The original function remains active while a new function is introduced.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The original function remains active while a new function is introduced.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 6", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "DISJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Resource, time, or uncertainty constraints make building a new feature unattractive.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Redeployment offers faster learning, but only if fit and inherited risk are checked. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Resource, time, or uncertainty constraints make building a new feature unattractive. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Resource, time, or uncertainty constraints make building a new feature unattractive.", "Redeployment offers faster learning, but only if fit and inherited risk are checked."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "Resource, time, or uncertainty constraints make building a new feature unattractive."}, {"display_text": "A team argues that a feature “already does this” without documenting the differences between old and new roles.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The claim needs a fit audit rather than simple reuse approval. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: A team argues that a feature “already does this” without documenting the differences between old and new roles. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A team argues that a feature “already does this” without documenting the differences between old and new roles.", "The claim needs a fit audit rather than simple reuse approval."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 8, "text": "A team argues that a feature “already does this” without documenting the differences between old and new roles."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 27, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-027", "ledger_sha256": "3e49ce29e847590a4aa13713441637acbc507ba689c972a674428be4fd4ad756"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Exhaustive Disjoint Partition Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:exhaustive_disjoint_partition_design", "slug": "exhaustive_disjoint_partition_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A universe must be divided for downstream use, but overlapping or uncovered membership would cause double counting, omission, conflicting routing, or ambiguous ownership.", "explanation_source": {"field": "diagnostic_head", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A universe must be divided for downstream use, but overlapping or uncovered membership would cause double counting, omission, conflicting routing, or ambiguous ownership."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "This branch preserves the complete remedy-free diagnostic route; goals, feasibility clauses, gates, deployment constraints, and supporting context remain outside the DNF."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Every partition starts with a determinate carrier set divided into blocks, which entails the condition's declared-universe carve-up.", "role_mapping": "The carrier set maps to the declared universe; partition blocks map to the downstream blocks.", "slug": "partition", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "ext001_exhaustive_disjoint_partition_design_a01", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored essence_one_line, compression_statement, components fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: A declared universe must be divided into blocks for counting, routing, ownership, stratification, inference, or allocation.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A declared universe must be divided into blocks for counting, routing, ownership, stratification, inference, or allocation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Partition", "one_liner": "A division of a set into non-overlapping, collectively exhaustive blocks.", "page_ref": "prime:partition", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "The carrier set maps to the declared universe; partition blocks map to the downstream blocks.", "slug": "partition", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Every partition starts with a determinate carrier set divided into blocks, which entails the condition's declared-universe carve-up."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A declared universe must be divided into blocks for counting, routing, ownership, stratification, inference, or allocation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Disjointness and exhaustiveness make exactly-one-block membership mandatory in every partition instance, directly entailing the condition.", "role_mapping": "Each carrier-set element maps to a member; the partition's single-valued membership maps to one and only one block.", "slug": "partition", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "ext001_exhaustive_disjoint_partition_design_a02", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored essence_one_line, compression_statement, components fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: Each member must belong to one and only one block.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Each member must belong to one and only one block."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Partition", "one_liner": "A division of a set into non-overlapping, collectively exhaustive blocks.", "page_ref": "prime:partition", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Each carrier-set element maps to a member; the partition's single-valued membership maps to one and only one block.", "slug": "partition", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Disjointness and exhaustiveness make exactly-one-block membership mandatory in every partition instance, directly entailing the condition."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Each member must belong to one and only one block.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "EXT001-C045", "dnf": [["EXT001-U045-O1"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"obligation_id": "EXT001-U045-O1", "predicate": "The current or proposed grouping can contain overlaps, gaps, or unresolved boundary cases."}], "predicate": "The current or proposed grouping can contain overlaps, gaps, or unresolved boundary cases.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "The current or proposed grouping can contain overlaps, gaps, or unresolved boundary cases.", "unit_id": "EXT001-U045"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"catalog_exhaustion": "CONDITION_LEVEL", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The current or proposed grouping can contain overlaps, gaps, or unresolved boundary cases.", "slug": "intersection"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The current or proposed grouping can contain overlaps, gaps, or unresolved boundary cases.", "slug": "clustering"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The current or proposed grouping can contain overlaps, gaps, or unresolved boundary cases.", "slug": "interleaving"}], "residual_id": "EXT001:exhaustive_disjoint_partition_design:C03", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding."}}, "condition_id": "ext001_exhaustive_disjoint_partition_design_a03", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored essence_one_line, compression_statement, components fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: The current or proposed grouping can contain overlaps, gaps, or unresolved boundary cases.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The current or proposed grouping can contain overlaps, gaps, or unresolved boundary cases."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The current or proposed grouping can contain overlaps, gaps, or unresolved boundary cases.", "slug": "intersection"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The current or proposed grouping can contain overlaps, gaps, or unresolved boundary cases.", "slug": "clustering"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The current or proposed grouping can contain overlaps, gaps, or unresolved boundary cases.", "slug": "interleaving"}], "normalized_requirement": "The current or proposed grouping can contain overlaps, gaps, or unresolved boundary cases.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The current or proposed grouping can contain overlaps, gaps, or unresolved boundary cases.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"candidate_ledger_sha256": "96f72d2139077fd57bf795048ebef33b3fd574b20963170080ec916b5b3b92fe", "extension_id": "new-archetypes-extension-001", "ledger_id": "prime-production-v1.2-extension-001", "ledger_sha256": "9644520614744632d1d36da44b1acd77ce432852c6083eb871203521c166efce"}, "base_projection_sha256": "841e0c7f3cb8e8054475ad29a8a14745a416b4fc115559a44878b94292e673ec", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "ca09ed9fe1598ce7072755b530de5553f5ee0a7cd64ae82d9e4a4e2149a37788", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Exhaustive Population Mapping", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:exhaustive_population_mapping", "slug": "exhaustive_population_mapping"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A decision, allocation, safety action, investigation, or inference requires knowing every unit in a defined population, but the available evidence is partial, sampled, duplicated, boundary-ambiguous, or scattered across sources.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A decision, allocation, safety action, investigation, or inference requires knowing every unit in a defined population, but the available evidence is partial, sampled, duplicated, boundary-ambiguous, or scattered across sources."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P045-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must contain a downstream action rather than description or inference alone.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A downstream action is to be taken with respect to a defined population.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must resolve action targets at unit level.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Specific population units are individually identified or addressable.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must connect the action directly to individually identified units.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The downstream action applies to those specific units.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve the contrast with aggregate or distribution-only knowledge.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A distributional estimate alone is insufficient for the required action.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "A downstream action must be applied to individually identified population units rather than being based only on a distributional estimate.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A downstream action requires individual-unit addressability, not only a distributional estimate.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P045-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Complete enumeration can support a negative-existence or global reachability inference without a downstream action addressed to specific units.", "slug": "complete_enumeration"}], "residual_id": "r:exhaustive_population_mapping:b027_a11_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b027_a11_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The downstream action applies to specific units rather than only to a distributional estimate. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The downstream action applies to specific units rather than only to a distributional estimate."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Complete enumeration can support a negative-existence or global reachability inference without a downstream action addressed to specific units.", "slug": "complete_enumeration"}], "normalized_requirement": "The downstream action applies to identified units rather than only to a distributional estimate.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The downstream action applies to identified units rather than only to a distributional estimate.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Double counting entails duplicated units in an aggregate but not missing or ambiguous identity, nor any listed consequence threshold.", "slug": "double_counting"}], "residual_id": "r:exhaustive_population_mapping:b027_a11_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b027_a11_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Missing units, duplicate units, or ambiguous unit identity would change rights, resources, risk, accountability, or scientific inference. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Missing units, duplicate units, or ambiguous unit identity would change rights, resources, risk, accountability, or scientific inference."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Double counting entails duplicated units in an aggregate but not missing or ambiguous identity, nor any listed consequence threshold.", "slug": "double_counting"}], "normalized_requirement": "Missing, duplicate, or ambiguous unit identity would change rights, resources, risk, accountability, or inference.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Missing, duplicate, or ambiguous unit identity would change rights, resources, risk, accountability, or inference.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A defined population, crisp unit identity, explicit boundary, and an all-unit measurement program are mandatory.", "role_mapping": "Bounded population -> defined target set; mapping -> enumeration program.", "slug": "complete_enumeration", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b027_a11_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The population is bounded enough that all-unit mapping is possible or can be approached with defensible residual uncertainty. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The population is bounded enough that all-unit mapping is possible or can be approached with defensible residual uncertainty."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Complete Enumeration", "one_liner": "A programmatic commitment to map every unit of a defined population, where completeness itself is the load-bearing property that unlocks inferences sampling cannot.", "page_ref": "prime:complete_enumeration", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Bounded population -> defined target set; mapping -> enumeration program.", "slug": "complete_enumeration", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A defined population, crisp unit identity, explicit boundary, and an all-unit measurement program are mandatory."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The population is bounded enough for all-unit mapping to be possible or approached with defensible residual uncertainty.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P045-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must concern existing records rather than an absence of all records.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Records about a defined population already exist.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must relate the records to population coverage.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The records purport or are used to cover units in the defined population.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail incomplete coverage rather than complete but inconvenient records.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "At least some population coverage required for completeness is missing.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Existing records cover only part of the defined population.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Existing population records are incomplete.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P045-C08-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P045-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must contain plural records capable of overlapping.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "At least two existing records or record sets concern the defined population.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must connect each record to population coverage.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The records represent units or coverage within that population.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail non-disjoint coverage rather than merely multiple records.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Some represented units or coverage appear in more than one record or record set.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Existing population records overlap in the units or coverage they represent.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Existing population records have overlapping coverage.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P045-C08-U2"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P045-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must concern existing records rather than no records.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Records about the population already exist.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve an earlier-to-current temporal baseline.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The records describe an earlier state than the current population state.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail staleness rather than age alone.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The records have lost sufficient currency for their present use.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Existing population records are no longer current for the population they are used to represent.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Existing population records are stale.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P045-C08-U3"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P045-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must concern existing population records.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Records about the population already exist.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must contain plural positions capable of contestation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "At least two stakeholder positions bear on the records.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail active contestation directed at the records.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The stakeholder positions conflict over the records' standing or use.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve political contestation rather than ordinary clerical disagreement.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The contest is political or institutionally power-laden.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Stakeholder positions politically contest the validity, coverage, or authority of existing population records.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Existing population records are politically contested.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P045-C08-U4"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P045-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must concern existing records rather than a proposed collection alone.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Records about the population already exist.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve the provenance direction from frame to records.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The records are derived from a sampling frame.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve the frame's nonexhaustive design rather than accidental later incompleteness.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The sampling frame was not intended to cover the population exhaustively.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must retain the inherited provenance and its prior-to-current direction.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The nonexhaustive frame design precedes the records' present use.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "Existing population records are derived from a sampling frame that was never intended to enumerate the population exhaustively.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Existing records inherit a nonexhaustive sampling frame.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P045-C08-U5"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An enumeration program may begin without prior records or from clean current records; defective existing records are not required.", "slug": "complete_enumeration"}], "residual_id": "r:exhaustive_population_mapping:b027_a11_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b027_a11_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Existing records are incomplete, overlapping, stale, politically contested, or derived from a sampling frame that was never meant to be exhaustive. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Existing records are incomplete, overlapping, stale, politically contested, or derived from a sampling frame that was never meant to be exhaustive."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PARTIALLY_DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Tried a cherry-picking instance that displayed the full available evidence population, but selective presentation and suppressed counterevidence are constitutive.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Cherry Picking", "one_liner": "Selectively presenting confirming evidence while suppressing disconfirming evidence from the same available population, so the offered sample gives an impression the full distribution would not support — locating the dishonesty in the selection process, not the individual data points.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:cherry_picking", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "cherry_picking"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "cherry_picking", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P045-C08-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent third-reader exact-record review confirms this disposition. Every exact instance presents existing evidence records as a population-representing sample while omitting part of the available evidence population."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Tried a complete surveillance-pyramid instance with full case coverage, but systematic recorded-count attenuation below the true case set is constitutive of the exact record.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Outbreak Underascertainment", "one_liner": "The surveillance failure in which recorded case counts fall systematically below the true count because a multi-stage detection pipeline — symptom expression, care-seeking, testing, confirmation, reporting — filters cases with biased attenuation at each layer.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:outbreak_underascertainment", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "outbreak_underascertainment"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "outbreak_underascertainment", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P045-C08-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent third-reader exact-record review confirms this disposition. Every exact instance contains existing population records whose coverage omits part of the true case population."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Tried a file-drawer instance whose visible record covered every conducted study, but result-dependent nonpublication and a hidden mass are constitutive.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "File Drawer Problem", "one_liner": "Recognize that studies with null results disproportionately go unpublished while significant ones enter the literature, so any synthesis treating the published record as the full population of conducted research systematically overestimates effect sizes toward the filter.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:file_drawer_problem", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "file_drawer_problem"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "file_drawer_problem", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P045-C08-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent third-reader exact-record review confirms this disposition. Every exact instance makes an existing visible record an incomplete representation of the defined conducted-study population."}], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 5, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 1, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 4}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An enumeration program may begin without prior records or from clean current records; defective existing records are not required.", "slug": "complete_enumeration"}], "normalized_requirement": "Existing records are incomplete, overlapping, stale, contested, or derived from a nonexhaustive sampling frame.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "PARTIAL_EXISTING_DSA_GROUNDING", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation grounded 1 of 5 eligible atomic units; the remaining unit or units stayed open."}, "predicate": "Existing records are incomplete, overlapping, stale, contested, or derived from a nonexhaustive sampling frame.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P045-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must contain an aggregate total and the individual population units it summarizes or purports to summarize.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An aggregate total represents or purports to represent a population of individual units.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must connect individual-unit status to construction or interpretation of the aggregate total.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Each relevant individual unit has an inclusion or classification status with respect to construction or interpretation of the aggregate.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail lost unit-level traceability for the selected named status rather than aggregation with preserved provenance.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The aggregate total does not reveal which individual units have the branch-specific status.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve the direction from aggregate representation to concealment of individual-unit status.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Use of the aggregate representation conceals the branch-specific unit identity or status information.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfying this branch must conceal the identities of units counted in the aggregate.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "In one branch, the aggregate conceals which individual units were counted.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfying this branch must conceal the identities of units omitted from the aggregate.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "In one branch, the aggregate conceals which individual units were omitted.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfying this branch must conceal the identities of units combined or merged within the aggregate.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "In one branch, the aggregate conceals which individual units were merged.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfying this branch must conceal the identities of units assigned to an incorrect classification.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "In one branch, the aggregate conceals which individual units were misclassified.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Aggregate totals conceal which individual units have been counted, omitted, merged, or misclassified.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Aggregate totals conceal one of four named unit-level statuses.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P045-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Aggregation can preserve unit-level provenance and need not conceal omissions or misclassification.", "slug": "aggregation"}], "residual_id": "r:exhaustive_population_mapping:b027_a11_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b027_a11_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Aggregate totals conceal which individual units have been counted, omitted, merged, or misclassified. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Aggregate totals conceal which individual units have been counted, omitted, merged, or misclassified."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Counterexample search found none: every complete exact-record instance preserves the mapped roles, relation, polarity, modality, and at least one complete required DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Outbreak Underascertainment", "one_liner": "The surveillance failure in which recorded case counts fall systematically below the true count because a multi-stage detection pipeline — symptom expression, care-seeking, testing, confirmation, reporting — filters cases with biased attenuation at each layer.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:outbreak_underascertainment", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "outbreak_underascertainment"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "outbreak_underascertainment", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P045-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent third-reader exact-record review confirms this disposition. DIRECT. The observed aggregate case count necessarily conceals which members of the true case set were omitted by the surveillance pipeline; the omitted-status DNF branch is the entailed branch, while merged and misclassified branches are not. No additional contextual fact or interpretive bridge is required."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Aggregate totals conceal which units were counted, omitted, merged, or misclassified.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime is distinguished from sampling by inferences and obligations that require no missing units, such as universal coverage and negative existence.", "role_mapping": "Sampling limitation -> no-missingness commitment; obligation -> completeness-dependent inference.", "slug": "complete_enumeration", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b027_a11_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Sampling can estimate prevalence but cannot support obligations such as notifying every affected person, patching every device, locating every hazard, or reconciling every transaction. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Sampling can estimate prevalence but cannot support obligations such as notifying every affected person, patching every device, locating every hazard, or reconciling every transaction."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Complete Enumeration", "one_liner": "A programmatic commitment to map every unit of a defined population, where completeness itself is the load-bearing property that unlocks inferences sampling cannot.", "page_ref": "prime:complete_enumeration", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Sampling limitation -> no-missingness commitment; obligation -> completeness-dependent inference.", "slug": "complete_enumeration", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime is distinguished from sampling by inferences and obligations that require no missing units, such as universal coverage and negative existence."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Sampling cannot support the universal obligation or completeness-dependent inference at issue.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 27, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-027", "ledger_sha256": "3e49ce29e847590a4aa13713441637acbc507ba689c972a674428be4fd4ad756"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Expected-Absence Signal Interpretation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:expected_absence_signal_interpretation", "slug": "expected_absence_signal_interpretation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 2, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 2, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 2 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system, person, process, experiment, channel, or institution expects an event, report, response, check-in, observation, or state transition. The event does not occur or is not recorded. Because blankness is easy to misread, the absence may be ignored even though it is a positive signal, or treated as decisive even though it was caused by latency, inaccessible channels, sensor failure, fear, incentives, missing denominators, or an unstated expectation.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system, person, process, experiment, channel, or institution expects an event, report, response, check-in, observation, or state transition. The event does not occur or is not recorded. Because blankness is easy to misread, the absence may be ignored even though it is a positive signal, or treated as decisive even though it was caused by latency, inaccessible channels, sensor failure, fear, incentives, missing denominators, or an unstated expectation."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A baseline expectation against which a non-occurrence is read is mandatory in every exact instance.", "role_mapping": "Expected event -> expectation role.", "slug": "absence_as_information", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b027_a12_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: An event, response, signal, filing, observation, heartbeat, objection, delivery, or report is expected by model, schedule, protocol, role, norm, obligation, or prior pattern. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["An event, response, signal, filing, observation, heartbeat, objection, delivery, or report is expected by model, schedule, protocol, role, norm, obligation, or prior pattern."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Absence as Information", "one_liner": "The non-occurrence of an expected event is itself a positive signal.", "page_ref": "prime:absence_as_information", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Expected event -> expectation role.", "slug": "absence_as_information", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A baseline expectation against which a non-occurrence is read is mandatory in every exact instance."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A model, schedule, protocol, role, norm, obligation, or prior pattern establishes an expected event.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact inference treats the observed gap as a positive constraint on hypotheses or identifies its hidden generator.", "role_mapping": "Non-occurrence -> observed gap; changed belief or action -> positive inference.", "slug": "absence_as_information", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b027_a12_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The non-occurrence would change a belief, risk rating, operational state, consent interpretation, compliance status, or intervention decision if interpreted correctly. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The non-occurrence would change a belief, risk rating, operational state, consent interpretation, compliance status, or intervention decision if interpreted correctly."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Absence as Information", "one_liner": "The non-occurrence of an expected event is itself a positive signal.", "page_ref": "prime:absence_as_information", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Non-occurrence -> observed gap; changed belief or action -> positive inference.", "slug": "absence_as_information", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact inference treats the observed gap as a positive constraint on hypotheses or identifies its hidden generator."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The non-occurrence would change belief, risk, state, consent, compliance, or intervention if correctly interpreted.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P045-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must contain an expected observable occurrence.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An event, response, report, or state transition is expected and could in principle be observed.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must connect observation opportunity to detection of the expected occurrence.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "An observation opportunity bears on whether occurrence or nonoccurrence could be detected.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve unresolved opportunity rather than verified adequacy or verified failure.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The adequacy or existence of that opportunity is uncertain.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "Whether an expected event had an adequate opportunity to be observed is uncertain.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Observation opportunity for an expected event is uncertain.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P045-C10-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P045-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must contain an expected occurrence and a path by which it could be observed.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An event, response, report, or state transition is expected and has an observation path.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve degraded capacity relative to a detection baseline.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The available observation opportunity is weaker than the opportunity required for reliable detection.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail degradation rather than total absence or fully adequate opportunity.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The opportunity is not fully adequate even though some observation path may remain.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "The opportunity to observe an expected event is degraded relative to what reliable detection requires.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Observation opportunity for an expected event is degraded.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P045-C10-U2"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P045-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must concern an observation opportunity that matters to interpretation.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An observation opportunity is relevant to interpreting an expected occurrence or non-observation.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must include an affirmative assumption by an interpreter, process, or system about observation opportunity, without universally requiring a human decision-maker.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A focal interpreter, decision process, or system treats the opportunity as having existed or been adequate.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve the contrast between assumption and verification.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The assumed opportunity is not verified.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve the source's recurrent tendency rather than a single isolated lapse.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "This substitution of assumption for verification occurs often or recurrently.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}], "predicate": "A focal interpreter, decision process, or system often treats observation opportunity as adequate by assumption rather than verification.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Observation opportunity is recurrently treated as adequate by assumption rather than verification.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P045-C10-U3"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime also includes high-power, verified searches whose nulls are strong evidence; degraded or assumed opportunity is not mandatory.", "slug": "absence_of_evidence_vs_evidence_of_absence"}], "residual_id": "r:expected_absence_signal_interpretation:b027_a12_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b027_a12_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Observation opportunity is uncertain, degraded, or often assumed rather than verified. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Observation opportunity is uncertain, degraded, or often assumed rather than verified."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PARTIALLY_DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Tried a guarded empty view with verified observation opportunity, but the exact construct withholds the cause and collapses normal absence, loading, permission, and feed failure into one blank state.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Empty-State Failure", "one_liner": "The interface condition in which a view has no content and provides no scaffolding for the absence — no explanation of the cause, no disambiguation among the possible causes (new, filtered, permission, loading, error), and no next action — so the user, left to infer meaning from nothing, typically concludes wrongly that the system is broken or gated.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:empty_state_failure", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1", "O2"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "empty_view_observes_expected_event_report", "predicate": "The empty view is the observation surface for a report of the expected focal event.", "rationale": "Every complete exact-record instance together with the single emitted qualifier satisfies one complete DNF branch without adding an unanchored role or relation."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "empty_state_failure"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The empty view is the observation surface for a report of the expected focal event."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "empty_state_failure", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P045-C10-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent third-reader exact-record review confirms this disposition. With the observation-surface guard, the exact record necessarily leaves adequacy of the event’s observation opportunity unresolved."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Counterexample search found none: every complete exact-record instance preserves the mapped roles, relation, polarity, modality, and at least one complete required DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Heisenbug", "one_liner": "Name the software defect whose failure vanishes under observation because attaching a debugger, adding a print, or disabling optimization perturbs the timing window or interleaving it rides on — so disappearance-under-observation is the diagnostic tell, not evidence the bug is gone.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:heisenbug", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "heisenbug"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "heisenbug", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P045-C10-U2", "why_it_fits": "Independent third-reader exact-record review confirms this disposition. DIRECT. The debugger or instrumentation is an observation path whose perturbation makes it weaker than reliable detection requires, while lower-perturbation paths remain. No additional contextual fact or interpretive bridge is required."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Tried an underascertainment instance with no observation path or with fully adequate detection, but the exact pyramid requires successive operating stages that retain some cases while filtering others.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Outbreak Underascertainment", "one_liner": "The surveillance failure in which recorded case counts fall systematically below the true count because a multi-stage detection pipeline — symptom expression, care-seeking, testing, confirmation, reporting — filters cases with biased attenuation at each layer.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:outbreak_underascertainment", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "outbreak_underascertainment"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "outbreak_underascertainment", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P045-C10-U2", "why_it_fits": "Independent third-reader exact-record review confirms this disposition. Every exact instance has an observation path whose detection capacity is degraded relative to reliable enumeration without being wholly absent."}], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 3, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 2, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime also includes high-power, verified searches whose nulls are strong evidence; degraded or assumed opportunity is not mandatory.", "slug": "absence_of_evidence_vs_evidence_of_absence"}], "normalized_requirement": "Observation opportunity is uncertain, degraded, or assumed rather than verified.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "PARTIAL_EXISTING_DSA_GROUNDING", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation grounded 2 of 3 eligible atomic units; the remaining unit or units stayed open."}, "predicate": "Observation opportunity is uncertain, degraded, or assumed rather than verified.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P045-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must contain a channel with an expected conveyance function.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A channel is expected to convey an event, report, response, or record.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve possibility rather than require an actual failure.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The channel can fail to perform that function.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve silent failure rather than signaled failure.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The possible failure produces no explicit indication that the channel failed.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "A channel can fail without emitting an explicit indication of its failure.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A channel can fail silently.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P045-C11-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P045-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must contain reports and a channel that should convey them.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Reports are expected to pass through a channel to a record or recipient.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve suppression rather than nonproduction of reports alone.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The channel prevents some reports from reaching the expected record or recipient.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve can rather than require that suppression has already occurred.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Such report suppression is a capability or possibility of the channel.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "A channel can suppress reports that would otherwise be conveyed or recorded.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A channel can suppress reports.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P045-C11-U2"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P045-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must contain records, a channel, and an expected or relevant timing baseline.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Records are expected to pass through a channel by a relevant time.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve delay relative to expected or decision-relevant timing.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The channel can cause records to arrive after that timing baseline.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve can rather than require an actual delayed record.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Record delay is a capability or possibility of the channel.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "A channel can delay records beyond the time when they are expected or decision-relevant.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A channel can delay records.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P045-C11-U3"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P045-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must include a response population with an affected subset.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "At least some actors are expected or invited to respond through a channel.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve reduced response ability, not mere actor difference.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Channel conditions leave the affected actors less able to respond than others or than a relevant baseline.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve the direction from channel conditions to response capacity.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The channel contributes to the reduced ability to respond.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve possibility rather than require an observed barrier.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The channel can produce this unequal ability effect.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "A channel can make some actors less able than others or than a relevant baseline to respond.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A channel can reduce some actors' ability to respond.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P045-C11-U4"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P045-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must include a response population with an affected subset.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "At least some actors are expected or invited to respond through a channel.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve a response-linked safety disadvantage.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Responding through the channel is less safe for the affected actors than nonresponse or a relevant baseline.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve the direction from channel conditions to response safety.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The channel contributes to the reduced safety of responding.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve possibility rather than require an observed harm.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The channel can produce this unequal safety effect.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "A channel can make responding less safe for some actors.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A channel can reduce some actors' safety in responding.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P045-C11-U5"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An informative absence can arise on a well-functioning channel; none of the listed channel failures is required.", "slug": "absence_as_information"}], "residual_id": "r:expected_absence_signal_interpretation:b027_a12_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b027_a12_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The channel can fail silently, suppress reports, delay records, or make some actors less able or safe to respond. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The channel can fail silently, suppress reports, delay records, or make some actors less able or safe to respond."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PARTIALLY_DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Tried a complete lag instance whose record arrived before the relevant deadline, but the exact pathology is defined by the result clock exceeding the decision clock.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Test-Turnaround Lag", "one_liner": "Diagnose why a valid test still failed to help by comparing two clocks — how long the result takes to arrive against how long the decision can wait — and reading the sign of the gap: when the result clock loses, the answer returns operationally inert.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:test_turnaround_lag", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "test_turnaround_lag"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "test_turnaround_lag", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P045-C11-U3", "why_it_fits": "Independent third-reader exact-record review confirms this disposition. Every exact instance contains a record-delivery channel whose timing can and does place the result beyond its decision-relevant arrival time."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Counterexample search found none: every complete exact-record instance preserves the mapped roles, relation, polarity, modality, and at least one complete required DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Empty-State Failure", "one_liner": "The interface condition in which a view has no content and provides no scaffolding for the absence — no explanation of the cause, no disambiguation among the possible causes (new, filtered, permission, loading, error), and no next action — so the user, left to infer meaning from nothing, typically concludes wrongly that the system is broken or gated.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:empty_state_failure", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "empty_state_failure"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "empty_state_failure", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P045-C11-U4", "why_it_fits": "Independent third-reader exact-record review confirms this disposition. DIRECT. Users in an unscaffolded empty-state subset lack the explanation and next action needed to respond through the interface, relative to a designed baseline. No additional contextual fact or interpretive bridge is required."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Counterexample search found none: every complete exact-record instance preserves the mapped roles, relation, polarity, modality, and at least one complete required DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Error-Message Opacity", "one_liner": "Diagnose the post-failure interface defect where a system correctly detects and announces a fault but the message omits the repair-supporting content — cause, context, next action, escalation — so the user is told they are stuck without being told how to get unstuck.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:error_message_opacity", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "error_message_opacity"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "error_message_opacity", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P045-C11-U4", "why_it_fits": "Independent third-reader exact-record review confirms this disposition. DIRECT. Users receiving an opaque error lack cause, context, next action, and escalation, reducing their recovery response capacity through the interface. No additional contextual fact or interpretive bridge is required."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Tried an alarm-fatigue instance with no reduced response capacity, but progressive desensitization, ignoring, silencing, or delayed response is constitutive of the exact construct.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Alarm Fatigue", "one_liner": "Reframe an operator's habitual silencing of clinical alarms as the rational response to a warning channel whose predictive value has collapsed, relocating the fix from the operator's discipline to the channel's specificity.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:alarm_fatigue", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "alarm_fatigue"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "alarm_fatigue", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P045-C11-U4", "why_it_fits": "Independent third-reader exact-record review confirms this disposition. Every exact instance is a channel-caused reduction in at least some exposed operators’ ability to respond to warnings."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Counterexample search found none: every complete exact-record instance preserves the mapped roles, relation, polarity, modality, and at least one complete required DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Navigation loop", "one_liner": "Diagnose a workflow where a user cannot reach their goal by modeling the interface as a directed graph and asking one structural question — is any goal state reachable from the current state? — rather than blaming screen quality or user confusion.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:navigation_loop", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "navigation_loop"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "navigation_loop", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P045-C11-U4", "why_it_fits": "Independent third-reader exact-record review confirms this disposition. DIRECT. The interface graph makes a goal unreachable for users, with screen-reader and keyboard users an explicitly more affected subset. No additional contextual fact or interpretive bridge is required."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Counterexample search found none: every complete exact-record instance preserves the mapped roles, relation, polarity, modality, and at least one complete required DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Progressive-Disclosure Failure", "one_liner": "Diagnose an interface's usability breakdowns as a single mistuning between its staging schedule and the readiness of the users and tasks it actually meets, read off by whether too much is hidden or too much exposed.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:progressive_disclosure_failure", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "progressive_disclosure_failure"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "progressive_disclosure_failure", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P045-C11-U4", "why_it_fits": "Independent third-reader exact-record review confirms this disposition. DIRECT. A mistuned interface schedule necessarily leaves a heterogeneous user or task subset less able to act than under a fitted schedule. No additional contextual fact or interpretive bridge is required."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Counterexample search found none: every complete exact-record instance preserves the mapped roles, relation, polarity, modality, and at least one complete required DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Microcopy Ambiguity", "one_liner": "The HCI failure where a terse interface label admits more than one reading, so the user decompresses it against a prior different from the designer's and acts correctly on the wrong interpretation.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:microcopy_ambiguity", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "microcopy_ambiguity"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "microcopy_ambiguity", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P045-C11-U4", "why_it_fits": "Independent third-reader exact-record review confirms this disposition. DIRECT. Users with divergent language, literacy, domain, disability, or context priors are less able to respond correctly through the terse interface than shared-prior users. No additional contextual fact or interpretive bridge is required."}], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 5, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 2, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 3}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An informative absence can arise on a well-functioning channel; none of the listed channel failures is required.", "slug": "absence_as_information"}], "normalized_requirement": "The channel can fail silently, suppress or delay records, or make response unsafe or inaccessible.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "PARTIAL_EXISTING_DSA_GROUNDING", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation grounded 2 of 5 eligible atomic units; the remaining unit or units stayed open."}, "predicate": "The channel can fail silently, suppress or delay records, or make response unsafe or inaccessible.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A baseline expectation against which a non-occurrence is read is mandatory in every exact instance.", "role_mapping": "Expected event -> expectation role.", "slug": "absence_as_information", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b027_a12_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: An event, response, signal, filing, observation, heartbeat, objection, delivery, or report is expected by model, schedule, protocol, role, norm, obligation, or prior pattern. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["An event, response, signal, filing, observation, heartbeat, objection, delivery, or report is expected by model, schedule, protocol, role, norm, obligation, or prior pattern."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Absence as Information", "one_liner": "The non-occurrence of an expected event is itself a positive signal.", "page_ref": "prime:absence_as_information", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Expected event -> expectation role.", "slug": "absence_as_information", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A baseline expectation against which a non-occurrence is read is mandatory in every exact instance."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A model, schedule, protocol, role, norm, obligation, or prior pattern establishes an expected event.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact inference treats the observed gap as a positive constraint on hypotheses or identifies its hidden generator.", "role_mapping": "Non-occurrence -> observed gap; changed belief or action -> positive inference.", "slug": "absence_as_information", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b027_a12_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The non-occurrence would change a belief, risk rating, operational state, consent interpretation, compliance status, or intervention decision if interpreted correctly. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The non-occurrence would change a belief, risk rating, operational state, consent interpretation, compliance status, or intervention decision if interpreted correctly."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Absence as Information", "one_liner": "The non-occurrence of an expected event is itself a positive signal.", "page_ref": "prime:absence_as_information", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Non-occurrence -> observed gap; changed belief or action -> positive inference.", "slug": "absence_as_information", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact inference treats the observed gap as a positive constraint on hypotheses or identifies its hidden generator."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The non-occurrence would change belief, risk, state, consent, compliance, or intervention if correctly interpreted.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime can be applied before anyone commits the folk inference; a tempted decision-maker is not part of every instance.", "slug": "absence_of_evidence_vs_evidence_of_absence"}], "residual_id": "r:expected_absence_signal_interpretation:b027_a12_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b027_a12_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A decision-maker is tempted to use a folk rule such as “no news is good news,” “silence is consent,” “nothing found means absent,” or “no heartbeat means failure.” The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A decision-maker is tempted to use a folk rule such as “no news is good news,” “silence is consent,” “nothing found means absent,” or “no heartbeat means failure.”"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime can be applied before anyone commits the folk inference; a tempted decision-maker is not part of every instance.", "slug": "absence_of_evidence_vs_evidence_of_absence"}], "normalized_requirement": "A decision-maker applies an unqualified folk rule to a non-observation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A decision-maker applies an unqualified folk rule to a non-observation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "False reassurance and false alarm both carry costs, so a calibrated interpretation is needed.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: False reassurance and false alarm both carry costs, so a calibrated interpretation is needed. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["False reassurance and false alarm both carry costs, so a calibrated interpretation is needed."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "False reassurance and false alarm both carry costs, so a calibrated interpretation is needed."}, {"display_text": "The cost of producing a positive record differs from the cost of producing a null or exception record.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The cost of producing a positive record differs from the cost of producing a null or exception record. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The cost of producing a positive record differs from the cost of producing a null or exception record."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "The cost of producing a positive record differs from the cost of producing a null or exception record."}, {"display_text": "The expected event’s latency distribution, base rate, or production incentives are changing over time.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The absence of an expected event can be valuable evidence, but only through a verified expectation and observation process. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The expected event’s latency distribution, base rate, or production incentives are changing over time. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The expected event’s latency distribution, base rate, or production incentives are changing over time.", "The absence of an expected event can be valuable evidence, but only through a verified expectation and observation process."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 8, "text": "The expected event’s latency distribution, base rate, or production incentives are changing over time."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 27, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-027", "ledger_sha256": "3e49ce29e847590a4aa13713441637acbc507ba689c972a674428be4fd4ad756"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": [{"groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "The apparent counterexample omits the emitted context qualifier; after enforcing that single atomic predicate, no complete candidate instance can falsify a unit obligation.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Novelty Effect", "one_liner": "Recognise that a newly introduced stimulus draws an elevated response tied to its recency, not its intrinsic worth, which decays near-exponentially toward a steady-state baseline — so short-window evaluation systematically over-estimates the intervention's lasting effect.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:novelty_effect", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "novelty_response_is_countable_event_rate", "predicate": "The novelty response is operationalized as the occurrence rate of a countable expected event.", "rationale": "Every complete exact-record instance together with the single emitted qualifier satisfies one complete DNF branch without adding an unanchored role or relation."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "novelty_effect"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The novelty response is operationalized as the occurrence rate of a countable expected event."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "novelty_effect", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P045-C14-U2", "why_it_fits": "Independent third-reader exact-record review confirms this disposition. GUARDED_CONTEXT. The response necessarily changes from the early recency-tied elevation to the later asymptote; a guard restricts the response measure to a countable expected-event rate. The emitted candidate-anchored qualifier fills every and only guardable gap."}], "publication_role": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT_ONLY", "source_residual_occurrence_id": "r:expected_absence_signal_interpretation:b027_a12_c8", "unit": {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P045-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must concern event frequency rather than latency or incentives.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An expected event has an underlying base rate or prevalence.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve a temporal baseline for change.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The base rate is compared across at least an earlier and a later period.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail temporal change rather than a stable base rate.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The event's base rate differs between the periods.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "The base rate of an expected event is changing over time.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Expected-event base rate changes over time.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P045-C14-U2"}}]}
{"archetype": {"name": "Experience Curve Cost Reduction", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:experience_curve_cost_reduction", "slug": "experience_curve_cost_reduction"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Repeated work has the potential to become cheaper, faster, safer, or less error-prone with experience, but the organization lacks a stable unit definition, experience counter, learning capture path, attribution model, and quality guardrail. As a result, learning remains local, cost curves are confused with scale or accounting effects, forecasts overpromise, and apparent savings may come from hidden harm rather than real capability gain.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Repeated work has the potential to become cheaper, faster, safer, or less error-prone with experience, but the organization lacks a stable unit definition, experience counter, learning capture path, attribution model, and quality guardrail. As a result, learning remains local, cost curves are confused with scale or accounting effects, forecasts overpromise, and apparent savings may come from hidden harm rather than real capability gain."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact independent variable is cumulative doing of a repeatable unit, not calendar time.", "role_mapping": "Repeated units -> cumulative experience axis.", "slug": "learning_curve_effects", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b027_a13_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A product, service, response, case, deployment, batch, task, drill, or transaction repeats often enough for cumulative experience to affect later performance. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A product, service, response, case, deployment, batch, task, drill, or transaction repeats often enough for cumulative experience to affect later performance."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Learning Curve Effects", "one_liner": "Unit cost falls predictably with cumulative production experience.", "page_ref": "prime:learning_curve_effects", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Repeated units -> cumulative experience axis.", "slug": "learning_curve_effects", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact independent variable is cumulative doing of a repeatable unit, not calendar time."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A stable unit repeats often enough for accumulated experience to affect later performance.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Every exact instance is a monotone decelerating decline in unit cost, time, or error indexed to cumulative experience.", "role_mapping": "Falling unit burden -> learning curve; cumulative count -> experience axis.", "slug": "learning_curve_effects", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b027_a13_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Unit cost, labor time, cycle time, defect rate, scrap, rework, coordination burden, training effort, or error risk appears to fall as cumulative experience increases. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Unit cost, labor time, cycle time, defect rate, scrap, rework, coordination burden, training effort, or error risk appears to fall as cumulative experience increases."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Learning Curve Effects", "one_liner": "Unit cost falls predictably with cumulative production experience.", "page_ref": "prime:learning_curve_effects", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Falling unit burden -> learning curve; cumulative count -> experience axis.", "slug": "learning_curve_effects", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Every exact instance is a monotone decelerating decline in unit cost, time, or error indexed to cumulative experience."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Unit cost, time, defect, scrap, rework, training effort, or error falls as cumulative experience increases.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P045-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve the early-to-later ordering of experience and work.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Early units generate lessons before later units perform related work.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail local retention rather than organization-wide availability.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The lessons remain confined to local people, teams, suppliers, shifts, or locations.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve failed or unreliable cross-unit propagation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The lessons do not transfer reliably to later units elsewhere.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must connect local confinement to absent reliable improvement downstream.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The transfer failure prevents the early lessons from reliably improving later work.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Lessons learned from early units remain confined to local people or operating units and therefore do not reliably improve later units elsewhere.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Locally trapped lessons fail to improve later work elsewhere.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P045-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A learning curve may be realized by one individual or unit and need not involve failed transfer across locations.", "slug": "learning_curve_effects"}], "residual_id": "r:experience_curve_cost_reduction:b027_a13_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b027_a13_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Lessons from early units are trapped in individuals, shifts, suppliers, locations, or incident teams and do not reliably improve later units. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Lessons from early units are trapped in individuals, shifts, suppliers, locations, or incident teams and do not reliably improve later units."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_SYNTHESIS", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Ungarded handoff loss can concern an unspoken commitment rather than a lesson; once the lost state is prior-work lessons, all remaining obligations follow from the exact transfer failure.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Handoff Loss", "one_liner": "Locate post-transition failures at the transfer relation itself: work crossing a boundary between actors arrives degraded because a bounded artifact cannot carry the sender's tacit state, so downstream decisions run on an impoverished reconstruction.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:handoff_loss", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "lost_handoff_state_is_earlier_unit_lessons", "predicate": "The sender's lost tacit state consists of lessons generated by the sender's earlier related work for the later receiving unit.", "rationale": "Every complete exact-record instance together with the single emitted qualifier satisfies one complete DNF branch without adding an unanchored role or relation."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "handoff_loss"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The sender's lost tacit state consists of lessons generated by the sender's earlier related work for the later receiving unit."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "handoff_loss", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P045-C15-U1", "why_it_fits": "The two blind guards were semantically equivalent but differently normalized; this synthesis retains their shared single content-type restriction and no additional fact."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Lessons remain trapped in individuals or local units and fail to improve later work elsewhere.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid measured learning curve can have its attribution cleanly separated; unseparated competing drivers are a diagnostic defect, not a necessary prime instance.", "slug": "learning_curve_effects"}], "residual_id": "r:experience_curve_cost_reduction:b027_a13_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b027_a13_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Cost reductions are being claimed, but the organization has not separated learning effects from economies of scale, automation, outsourcing, case-mix change, input-price shifts, or quality degradation. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Cost reductions are being claimed, but the organization has not separated learning effects from economies of scale, automation, outsourcing, case-mix change, input-price shifts, or quality degradation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid measured learning curve can have its attribution cleanly separated; unseparated competing drivers are a diagnostic defect, not a necessary prime instance.", "slug": "learning_curve_effects"}], "normalized_requirement": "Claimed cost reduction has not been separated from scale, automation, outsourcing, case mix, input price, or quality degradation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Claimed cost reduction has not been separated from scale, automation, outsourcing, case mix, input price, or quality degradation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Leaders need to forecast future unit economics, capacity, readiness, or productivity from cumulative production or practice volume.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: Leaders need to forecast future unit economics, capacity, readiness, or productivity from cumulative production or practice volume. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Leaders need to forecast future unit economics, capacity, readiness, or productivity from cumulative production or practice volume."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Leaders need to forecast future unit economics, capacity, readiness, or productivity from cumulative production or practice volume."}, {"display_text": "The system must preserve safety, equity, reliability, or service quality while pursuing lower unit cost.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Experience can compound into lower cost and higher capability, but only if it is converted into transferable learning; otherwise it remains local memory, misleading curve fitting, or pressure to cut corners. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: The system must preserve safety, equity, reliability, or service quality while pursuing lower unit cost. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The system must preserve safety, equity, reliability, or service quality while pursuing lower unit cost.", "Experience can compound into lower cost and higher capability, but only if it is converted into transferable learning; otherwise it remains local memory, misleading curve fitting, or pressure to cut corners."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The system must preserve safety, equity, reliability, or service quality while pursuing lower unit cost."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 27, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-027", "ledger_sha256": "3e49ce29e847590a4aa13713441637acbc507ba689c972a674428be4fd4ad756"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Explicit State Modeling", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:explicit_state_modeling", "slug": "explicit_state_modeling"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 2, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is hidden state. The system already has state-like distinctions, but they live inside people’s assumptions, scattered records, informal language, or inconsistent tools. One actor treats a case as open, another as resolved, another as waiting for evidence. A device is treated as healthy by a dashboard and degraded by an operator. An application is treated as complete by one office and deficient by another.\n\nThe harm comes from the mismatch between implicit state and actual behavior. When state is unclear, actors perform actions that are premature, duplicate, prohibited, unsafe, or impossible. Work stalls in limbo. Exceptions get forced into normal categories. Terminal states are confused with reversible inactive states. Failures become difficult to diagnose because no one can reconstruct which state the system was believed to be in.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system behaves differently depending on its current state, but the states are hidden, ambiguous, overloaded, stale, or inconsistently represented. Different actors infer different conditions and therefore apply different rules to the same case, object, process, or relationship."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact model requires current state plus input to determine future behavior and outputs.", "role_mapping": "Current condition -> state; varying behavior -> state-dependent output or transition.", "slug": "state_and_state_transition", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b027_a14_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Behavior varies by current condition. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Behavior varies by current condition."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "State and State Transition", "one_liner": "Captures system condition and evolution.", "page_ref": "prime:state_and_state_transition", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Current condition -> state; varying behavior -> state-dependent output or transition.", "slug": "state_and_state_transition", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact model requires current state plus input to determine future behavior and outputs."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "System behavior varies with its current condition or regime.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P046-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must include one shared status referent rather than unrelated labels.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A status or state is the common referent of the language at issue.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must contain plural actors or vocabularies, not one speaker's private ambiguity.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "At least two actors or actor-specific vocabularies describe that status.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve co-reference between the differing status expressions.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The actors use different terms for the same status.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail semantic or operational conflict between the terms.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The status terms are conflicting or incompatible, not merely stylistically different.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Multiple actors use incompatible terms for the same status.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Actors use conflicting language for one shared status.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P046-C01-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Inconsistent shared models can use identical language while assigning different underlying values, and differing terminology need not imply incompatible models.", "slug": "inconsistent_shared_model"}], "residual_id": "r:explicit_state_modeling:b027_a14_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b027_a14_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Actors use conflicting status language. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Actors use conflicting status language."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Inconsistent shared models can use identical language while assigning different underlying values, and differing terminology need not imply incompatible models.", "slug": "inconsistent_shared_model"}], "normalized_requirement": "Actors use conflicting language for the same status.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Actors use conflicting language for the same status.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P046-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must contain a stateful object or process.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A system or process has distinguishable states.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must include state transitions rather than static status labels alone.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The system or process moves between those states.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must include a transition-map role that can be shared across relevant users or components.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Relevant actors or components would use a common representation of possible transitions.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve absence of the common map rather than an incomplete use of an existing map.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "No shared transition map is available for the occurring transitions.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "State transitions occur without a shared representation of the transition structure.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "State changes lack a shared transition map.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P046-C02-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime is the explicit state-transition representation and therefore does not entail that a shared map is absent.", "slug": "state_and_state_transition"}], "residual_id": "r:explicit_state_modeling:b027_a14_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b027_a14_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Transitions happen without a shared map. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Transitions happen without a shared map."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime is the explicit state-transition representation and therefore does not entail that a shared map is absent.", "slug": "state_and_state_transition"}], "normalized_requirement": "State transitions occur without a shared transition map.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "State transitions occur without a shared transition map.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P046-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must contain a state-bearing object or process.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A system, object, or process can occupy different states.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve a conditional state-to-permission relation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Which action is permitted depends on the current state.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must include a user or process for whom the state-conditioned authorization matters.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A relevant actor or decision process must apply the permission rule.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve unresolved or opaque authorization, not a fully specified rule.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The state-to-permission mapping is unclear or not legible to that actor or process.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "The mapping from system state to permitted actions is unclear to relevant actors or decision processes.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "State-dependent permission rules are unclear.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P046-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A state-transition model need not contain permissions, and any permissions it contains may be fully explicit.", "slug": "state_and_state_transition"}], "residual_id": "r:explicit_state_modeling:b027_a14_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b027_a14_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: State-dependent permissions are unclear. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["State-dependent permissions are unclear."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "If the authorization boundary yields a decidable permitted action for every encountered situation, the defining grain mismatch and rules-of-engagement ambiguity disappear.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Rules-of-Engagement Ambiguity", "one_liner": "Diagnose frontline breakdown under time pressure as a grain mismatch — decision rules written coarser than the environment generates choice points — paid out of a finite discretion budget, relocating the fix from the operator's judgment to the rule, escalation path, and pre-positioned authority.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:rules_of_engagement_ambiguity", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "rules_of_engagement_ambiguity"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "rules_of_engagement_ambiguity", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P046-C03-U1", "why_it_fits": "The candidate directly entails an unclear mapping from operational state to permitted action for the relevant actor."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Permissions that depend on state are unclear.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P046-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must contain a failure regime represented or representable as system state.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A system has at least one operational condition treated as a failure state.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve a state-level failure role, not failure as an undifferentiated event alone.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The failure condition is a distinguishable state or regime of the system.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail absence of a state name rather than ambiguity among existing names.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The failure state lacks an explicit name or label.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "One or more distinct system failure states lack explicit names.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "System failure states are unnamed.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P046-C04-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact model may name every failure state or may model a system with no designated failure state.", "slug": "state_and_state_transition"}], "residual_id": "r:explicit_state_modeling:b027_a14_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b027_a14_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Failures become difficult to diagnose because no one can reconstruct which state the system was believed to be in. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Failure states are unnamed.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Failure states are unnamed.", "Failures become difficult to diagnose because no one can reconstruct which state the system was believed to be in."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Without the stated branch or domain qualifier, the candidate has complete in-scope instances that do not satisfy the residual; with it, the cited branch is forced.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Empty-State Failure", "one_liner": "The interface condition in which a view has no content and provides no scaffolding for the absence — no explanation of the cause, no disambiguation among the possible causes (new, filtered, permission, loading, error), and no next action — so the user, left to infer meaning from nothing, typically concludes wrongly that the system is broken or gated.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:empty_state_failure", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "absence_cause_is_terminal_error", "predicate": "determinate_absence_cause equals terminal_error", "rationale": "The retained structural spine and one candidate-anchored atomic qualifier jointly force a complete DNF branch without laundering."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "empty_state_failure"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "absence_cause_is_terminal_error"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "empty_state_failure", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P046-C04-U1", "why_it_fits": "One atomic, candidate-anchored context qualifier fills exactly the recorded guardable gap; all remaining obligations are directly entailed."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Failure states are unnamed.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 27, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-027", "ledger_sha256": "3e49ce29e847590a4aa13713441637acbc507ba689c972a674428be4fd4ad756"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Exposure Pathway Interruption", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:exposure_pathway_interruption", "slug": "exposure_pathway_interruption"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 2, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 3, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 7 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 2 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 7}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A hazard is present, but the operative risk is unclear because the route by which it can reach vulnerable targets is hidden, fragmented, assumed, or described only at the level of broad exposure. Without a source-pathway-receptor model, controls may be placed at the wrong link, vulnerable targets may remain reachable through substitute paths, and risk may migrate rather than fall.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A hazard is present, but the operative risk is unclear because the route by which it can reach vulnerable targets is hidden, fragmented, assumed, or described only at the level of broad exposure. Without a source-pathway-receptor model, controls may be placed at the wrong link, vulnerable targets may remain reachable through substitute paths, and risk may migrate rather than fall."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime consists of a hazard source, vulnerable receptor, and finite chain of links carrying harm between them.", "role_mapping": "Origin -> hazard source; target -> vulnerable receptor; movement -> pathway chain.", "slug": "exposure_pathway", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b027_a15_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The hazard is not only located somewhere; it has a possible travel route. In this condition set, the requirement is: A harmful agent, pressure, signal, failure, pathogen, attack, or burden can travel from a source to a target.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A harmful agent, pressure, signal, failure, pollutant, pathogen, attack, or burden can move from an origin to a target."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Exposure Pathway", "one_liner": "The chain of links by which a hazard travels from source to vulnerable target, breakable at any link, turning risk into a graph search over severable routes.", "page_ref": "prime:exposure_pathway", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Origin -> hazard source; target -> vulnerable receptor; movement -> pathway chain.", "slug": "exposure_pathway", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime consists of a hazard source, vulnerable receptor, and finite chain of links carrying harm between them."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A harmful agent, pressure, signal, failure, pathogen, attack, or burden can travel from a source to a target.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P046-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must include plural targets or locations rather than one target alone.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A target population or target set contains at least two relevant receptors or locations.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve hazard-relative vulnerability across the compared targets.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The targets are receptors for the same hazard or exposure process.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail unequal vulnerability, not merely multiple vulnerability dimensions.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Vulnerability differs among targets or across locations in the target set.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must locate variation between units or locations rather than solely within one receptor.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The heterogeneity is distributed across receptors or places.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Targets exposed or exposable to the same hazard have a heterogeneous vulnerability distribution.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Exposure targets differ in vulnerability.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P046-C05-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Vulnerability decomposition can concern one target's dimensions and does not require spatial or population heterogeneity.", "slug": "vulnerability_decomposition"}], "residual_id": "r:exposure_pathway_interruption:b027_a15_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b027_a15_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Exposure intensity matters together with sensitivity and adaptive capacity. In this condition set, the requirement is: Targets are heterogeneously vulnerable across people, components, places, data, or assets.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The target population, component, place, data set, or asset is not equally vulnerable everywhere."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Vulnerability decomposition can concern one target's dimensions and does not require spatial or population heterogeneity.", "slug": "vulnerability_decomposition"}], "normalized_requirement": "Targets are heterogeneously vulnerable across people, components, places, data, or assets.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Targets are heterogeneously vulnerable across people, components, places, data, or assets.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid pathway analysis makes the route explicit before selecting controls; reversed sequencing is not necessary.", "slug": "exposure_pathway"}], "residual_id": "r:exposure_pathway_interruption:b027_a15_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b027_a15_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A filter, barrier, cleanup, warning, or evacuation may miss the active link. In this condition set, the requirement is: Controls are selected before the transport pathway is explicit.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Controls are being discussed before the transport path is explicit."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid pathway analysis makes the route explicit before selecting controls; reversed sequencing is not necessary.", "slug": "exposure_pathway"}], "normalized_requirement": "Controls are selected before the transport pathway is explicit.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Controls are selected before the transport pathway is explicit.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P046-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must contain a hazard-transmission or exposure relation.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A hazard can in principle move from a source toward one or more vulnerable targets.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve multiple transmissive links, not one path segment.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "At least two distinct media, carriers, interfaces, or handoffs participate or can participate in transmission.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must connect each counted link type to hazard transmission.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The distinct links can carry or pass the hazard onward.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve the source's capability modality.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Transmission through the multiple links is possible, not asserted to occur in every case.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "A hazard can reach targets through multiple distinct transmission links or handoffs.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Multiple links can transmit one hazard.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P046-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An exposure pathway can be a single direct chain through one medium and need not include multiple carriers or interfaces.", "slug": "exposure_pathway"}], "residual_id": "r:exposure_pathway_interruption:b027_a15_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b027_a15_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Air, water, soil, surfaces, supply routes, data channels, people, vectors, and institutional interfaces can all be links. In this condition set, the requirement is: Multiple media, carriers, interfaces, or handoffs can transmit the hazard.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Multiple media, carriers, interfaces, or social/technical handoffs can transmit the hazard."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A purported instance with only one causal link or with an edge incapable of carrying the hazard lacks the defining conjunctive multi-edge path and is not latent-path activation.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Latent-Path Activation", "one_liner": "Explain harm that arrives while every factor is individually in-range as a previously inert causal path going live only when a rare conjunction of gating states closes every edge along it at once.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:latent_path_activation", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "latent_path_activation"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "latent_path_activation", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P046-C07-U1", "why_it_fits": "The candidate's AND-gated harm path directly entails multiple hazard-transmitting links."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A complete candidate instance that preserves the cited roles and relation cannot falsify the selected DNF branch; changing any mapped term breaks the candidate identity.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Active Failure", "one_liner": "The frontline operator's act at the sharp end that completes a hazard path by aligning with holes latent conditions had pre-positioned in a system's layered defenses — the proximate, visible half of Reason's Swiss cheese model.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:active_failure", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "active_failure"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "active_failure", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P046-C07-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact candidate record entails one complete obligation branch without an added contextual or interpretive qualifier."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Multiple media, carriers, interfaces, or handoffs can transmit the hazard.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P046-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must contain an exposure route before the blocking action.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An existing route can carry a hazard toward a vulnerable target.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must include interruption of the original hazard path.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "An intervention blocks or materially reduces that route.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must contain replacement reachability, not elimination of exposure alone.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A substitute path preserves or renews hazard transmission after the block.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve the causal direction from blocking to substitute-path use or availability.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Blocking the original route induces or prompts the substitution.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfying the adjacent-route branch must entail topological or channel-adjacent rerouting.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The substitute path uses an adjacent route.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfying the behavior branch must entail actors adapting behavior to create or use another path.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The substitute path arises through behavior change.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Blocking one exposure route can induce a substitute path through an adjacent route or behavior change.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Blocking one exposure route can induce a substitute path.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P046-C08-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Coverage is monotone in available pathways and does not entail behavioral substitution after one route is blocked.", "slug": "coverage_reachability"}], "residual_id": "r:exposure_pathway_interruption:b027_a15_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b027_a15_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Risk migration is likely when the generative source remains and alternative paths exist. In this condition set, the requirement is: Blocking one route can induce an adjacent route or behaviorally substituted path.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A blocked route can be replaced by an adjacent route or by behavior change."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Without the stated branch or domain qualifier, the candidate has complete in-scope instances that do not satisfy the residual; with it, the cited branch is forced.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Risk Transfer Without Reduction", "one_liner": "The maladaptation pattern in which an adaptation or defence lowers risk at a protected site by displacing the unchanged hazard onto a voiceless neighbour, catchment, or future generation — because it acts on one node's exposure rather than the generative pressure.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:risk_transfer_without_reduction", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O5"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "destination_is_channel_adjacent", "predicate": "displacement_destination is channel_adjacent_to protected_beneficiary", "rationale": "The retained structural spine and one candidate-anchored atomic qualifier jointly force a complete DNF branch without laundering."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "risk_transfer_without_reduction"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "destination_is_channel_adjacent"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "risk_transfer_without_reduction", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P046-C08-U1", "why_it_fits": "One atomic, candidate-anchored context qualifier fills exactly the recorded guardable gap; all remaining obligations are directly entailed."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Blocking one route can induce an adjacent route or behaviorally substituted path.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P046-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must include a hazard-risk claim rather than arbitrary coverage.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A claim concerns risk from a hazard reaching vulnerable targets.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must contain the target set over which completeness is evaluated.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A bounded set of relevant vulnerable targets is identified.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must connect target coverage to hazard-carrying paths.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Exposure paths define possible hazard reachability to those targets.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve the universal-over-targets and existential-over-paths quantifier structure.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Every relevant target must be reachable from at least one exposure path for complete coverage.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve dependence of the risk claim on complete target reachability.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The risk claim's validity or interpretation depends on that reachability condition.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "The validity or interpretation of a risk claim depends on whether every relevant vulnerable target is reachable by at least one exposure path.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Risk claims depend on complete exposure-path reachability.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P046-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Coverage reachability is substrate-general and can concern curricula, tests, or destinations without any risk or vulnerable receptor.", "slug": "coverage_reachability"}], "residual_id": "r:exposure_pathway_interruption:b027_a15_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b027_a15_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The question is not only probability but coverage and reachability of target sets. In this condition set, the requirement is: A risk claim depends on whether every relevant target is reachable from at least one exposure path.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Risk claims depend on whether every relevant target is reachable from at least one path."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Coverage reachability is substrate-general and can concern curricula, tests, or destinations without any risk or vulnerable receptor.", "slug": "coverage_reachability"}], "normalized_requirement": "A risk claim depends on whether every relevant target is reachable from at least one exposure path.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A risk claim depends on whether every relevant target is reachable from at least one exposure path.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P046-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must include an intervention with remedial intent or function.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An intervention is undertaken for a remedial or risk-reducing purpose.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must concern a hazard-exposure pathway, not generic intervention harm.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A hazard and vulnerable target define the potential harmful exposure relation.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve the direction from intervention to changed exposure route.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The remedial intervention causes the exposure-pathway worsening.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must connect the pathway change to greater hazard reach or intensity.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The changed pathway enables or increases harmful exposure.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve possibility rather than universal intervention harm.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The intervention can have this effect, without asserting that every remedy does.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfying the creation branch must entail a newly opened pathway.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The intervention creates a harmful exposure route that did not previously exist.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfying the intensification branch must entail increased exposure along an existing pathway.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The intervention intensifies an already existing harmful exposure route.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A remedial intervention can worsen hazard exposure by creating a new harmful route or intensifying an existing one.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A remedy can worsen harmful exposure pathways.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P046-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Coupled harm need not be an exposure route, and intervention-created exposure can arise on a separable side channel rather than the benefit mechanism.", "slug": "intervention_coupled_harm"}], "residual_id": "r:exposure_pathway_interruption:b027_a15_c7", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b027_a15_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Intervention-coupled harm requires checking benefit and harm through the same channel. In this condition set, the requirement is: A remedial intervention can create or intensify a harmful exposure route.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A remedial intervention can itself create or intensify a harmful exposure route."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A surrogate can improve while the clinical endpoint merely stays flat, preserving the candidate without increased harm. Selecting the record's sign-reversed branch rules that out and leaves the off-pathway route supplied by the DSA.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Surrogate Endpoint Problem", "one_liner": "The failure that arises when a trial's biomarker surrogate diverges from the clinical endpoint it stands in for — because the intervention acts through off-pathway mechanisms the surrogate cannot see — so individual-level correlation does not license an intervention-level claim.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:surrogate_endpoint_problem", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O4"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "clinical_endpoint_sign_reversal", "predicate": "The surrogate and clinical endpoint diverge with the clinical endpoint worsening after intervention.", "rationale": "The retained structural spine and one candidate-anchored atomic qualifier jointly force a complete DNF branch without laundering."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "surrogate_endpoint_problem"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "clinical_endpoint_sign_reversal"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "surrogate_endpoint_problem", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P046-C10-U1", "why_it_fits": "The single branch selector restricts the documented divergence family to its harmful sign-reversal subtype."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_SYNTHESIS", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A profit-seeking or offensive action can instantiate collateral-damage blowback without remedial intent. The guard excludes it, while the exact harm footprint and return channel force the creation branch.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Collateral-Damage Blowback", "one_liner": "Diagnose why a tactically successful action ends net negative — its peripheral harm feeds a reaction channel that routes cost back to the actor's own future capacity, delayed and amplified — distinguishing a return channel from an ordinary externality.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:collateral_damage_blowback", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "action_is_risk_reducing", "predicate": "The tactically scoped action is undertaken to reduce a pre-existing hazard or risk.", "rationale": "The retained structural spine and one candidate-anchored atomic qualifier jointly force a complete DNF branch without laundering."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "collateral_damage_blowback"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "action_is_risk_reducing"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "collateral_damage_blowback", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P046-C10-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact candidate supplies the action-to-new-harm-route spine; one atomic purpose restriction supplies the otherwise missing remedial intent."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A complete candidate instance that preserves the cited roles and relation cannot falsify the selected DNF branch; changing any mapped term breaks the candidate identity.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Adverse Drug Event", "one_liner": "Harm to a patient caused by the pharmacology of a drug rather than the process of delivering it — bracketing mechanistically unlike injuries under one causal structure so the prescribing question becomes a benefit-to-harm ratio, not a binary safety verdict.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:adverse_drug_event", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "adverse_drug_event"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "adverse_drug_event", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P046-C10-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact candidate record entails one complete obligation branch without an added contextual or interpretive qualifier."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A complete candidate instance that preserves the cited roles and relation cannot falsify the selected DNF branch; changing any mapped term breaks the candidate identity.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Risk Transfer Without Reduction", "one_liner": "The maladaptation pattern in which an adaptation or defence lowers risk at a protected site by displacing the unchanged hazard onto a voiceless neighbour, catchment, or future generation — because it acts on one node's exposure rather than the generative pressure.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:risk_transfer_without_reduction", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "risk_transfer_without_reduction"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "risk_transfer_without_reduction", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P046-C10-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact candidate record entails one complete obligation branch without an added contextual or interpretive qualifier."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "If the concurrent orders do not add on one pharmacologic target beyond the therapeutic window, they are not therapeutic duplication under the record's definition.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Therapeutic Duplication", "one_liner": "The medication-safety failure where uncoordinated prescribers each place a defensible order that lands on the same pharmacologic target, so additive exposure overruns the therapeutic window — a harm that lives in the set of orders, not in any single one.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:therapeutic_duplication", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "therapeutic_duplication"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "therapeutic_duplication", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P046-C10-U1", "why_it_fits": "The candidate directly entails a set of remedies intensifying a harmful exposure route to the treated patient."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A remedial intervention can create or intensify a harmful exposure route.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 27, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-027", "ledger_sha256": "3e49ce29e847590a4aa13713441637acbc507ba689c972a674428be4fd4ad756"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Externality Internalization", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:externality_internalization", "slug": "externality_internalization"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a mismatch between the boundary of decision and the boundary of consequence. One actor makes the choice, but another actor, community, institution, ecosystem, team, user group, time horizon, or shared system absorbs the effect.\n\nThis makes local optimization misleading. A product can look cheap because disposal is somebody else’s problem. A financial strategy can look profitable because systemic risk is not on the trader’s ledger. A software release can look fast because downstream support and moderation costs are carried by another team. The hidden subsidy comes from whatever sits outside the current accounting or responsibility boundary.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A decision-making unit excludes material costs, harms, risks, benefits, dependencies, or obligations from its own accounting or responsibility boundary, allowing locally rational choices to degrade outcomes for other actors, adjacent systems, future users, shared resources, or the whole system."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Every externality has an operator whose action produces an uncompensated third-party effect across its private boundary.", "role_mapping": "Local actor -> operator; displaced effect -> third-party spillover.", "slug": "externality", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b028_a01_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A local actor can create costs, risks, harms, burdens, or benefits that are borne outside its operational, financial, legal, metric, or governance boundary. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A local actor can create costs, risks, harms, burdens, or benefits that are borne outside its operational, financial, legal, metric, or governance boundary."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Externality", "one_liner": "Spillover effects.", "page_ref": "prime:externality", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Local actor -> operator; displaced effect -> third-party spillover.", "slug": "externality", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Every externality has an operator whose action produces an uncompensated third-party effect across its private boundary."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A local actor creates costs, risks, harms, burdens, or benefits borne outside its decision boundary.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The defining invariant is divergence between private and social margins because a technological effect is excluded from the actor's price or ledger.", "role_mapping": "Local efficiency -> private margin; excluded effects -> social-private divergence.", "slug": "externality", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b028_a01_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A product, policy, market transaction, platform rule, infrastructure decision, or organizational choice looks efficient only because downstream, upstream, social, environmental, or systemic effects are excluded. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A product, policy, market transaction, platform rule, infrastructure decision, or organizational choice looks efficient only because downstream, upstream, social, environmental, or systemic effects are excluded."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Externality", "one_liner": "Spillover effects.", "page_ref": "prime:externality", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Local efficiency -> private margin; excluded effects -> social-private divergence.", "slug": "externality", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The defining invariant is divergence between private and social margins because a technological effect is excluded from the actor's price or ledger."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A choice appears locally efficient because upstream, downstream, social, environmental, or systemic effects are excluded.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P046-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must contain an actor, an action, and an operative incentive.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A decision-making actor or unit chooses or performs an action under a current incentive structure.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve a positive local reward attached to the action.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The incentive rewards a proximate local output or saving from the action.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must include a displaced cost, harm, or risk outside the local decision boundary.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Material adverse consequences are borne or accumulate beyond the actor's accounting or responsibility boundary.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must connect the locally rewarded behavior causally to the outside effect.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The same rewarded action causes or contributes to the displaced consequences.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve the concurrent or repeated reward-and-accumulation structure.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The outside consequences accumulate while the local reward remains operative.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "Current incentives reward a locally beneficial action while material adverse consequences from that action accumulate outside the actor's accounting or responsibility boundary.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Local incentives reward actions whose harms accumulate elsewhere.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P046-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Positive externalities can cause underproduction because external benefits are omitted; the listed reward-and-harm direction is not universal.", "slug": "externality"}], "residual_id": "r:externality_internalization:b028_a01_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b028_a01_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Current incentives reward production, growth, speed, convenience, or local savings while displaced consequences accumulate elsewhere. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Current incentives reward production, growth, speed, convenience, or local savings while displaced consequences accumulate elsewhere."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Positive externalities can cause underproduction because external benefits are omitted; the listed reward-and-harm direction is not universal.", "slug": "externality"}], "normalized_requirement": "Current incentives reward production, growth, speed, convenience, or local savings while consequences accumulate elsewhere.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Current incentives reward production, growth, speed, convenience, or local savings while consequences accumulate elsewhere.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P046-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must include affected parties distinct from or external to the effect-controlling actor.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "One or more parties bear an effect outside the responsible actor's boundary.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must contain a responsible actor with control over the effect.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "An actor or decision-making unit can materially change the outside effect.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve absence of a direct affected-party-to-actor feedback path.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "No direct channel carries the affected parties' experience of the effect to that actor.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must concern informational visibility, not cost transfer alone.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The missing channel's relevant function would be to make the outside effect visible to the actor.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Parties bearing an outside effect lack a direct channel that makes the effect visible to the actor who can change it.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Affected parties lack a direct visibility channel to the responsible actor.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P046-C12-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P046-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must include affected parties distinct from or external to the effect-controlling actor.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "One or more parties bear an effect outside the responsible actor's boundary.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must contain a responsible actor with control over the effect.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "An actor or decision-making unit can materially change the outside effect.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve absence of a direct consequence-imposing path.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "No direct channel transfers cost, liability, sanction, or another binding consequence from the affected parties to that actor.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must concern cost or consequence transfer, not informational visibility alone.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The missing channel's relevant function would be to make persistence of the outside effect costly to the actor.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Parties bearing an outside effect lack a direct channel that makes the effect costly to the actor who can change it.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Affected parties lack a direct cost-imposing channel to the responsible actor.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P046-C12-U2"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Externalities can persist despite a direct communication channel because bargaining costs, rights, or party multiplicity block internalization.", "slug": "externality"}], "residual_id": "r:externality_internalization:b028_a01_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b028_a01_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Affected parties lack a direct channel to make the external effect visible or costly to the decision-maker. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Affected parties lack a direct channel to make the external effect visible or costly to the decision-maker."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 2, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 2}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Externalities can persist despite a direct communication channel because bargaining costs, rights, or party multiplicity block internalization.", "slug": "externality"}], "normalized_requirement": "Affected parties lack a direct channel to make the outside effect visible or costly to the actor.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 2 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Affected parties lack a direct channel to make the outside effect visible or costly to the actor.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Internalization is the achieved relocation of governance and does not require a prior optional consultation process.", "slug": "internalization"}], "residual_id": "r:externality_internalization:b028_a01_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b028_a01_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Voluntary awareness, disclosure, or stakeholder consultation is insufficient because the external effect remains optional or consequence-free for the actor who can change it. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Voluntary awareness, disclosure, or stakeholder consultation is insufficient because the external effect remains optional or consequence-free for the actor who can change it."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Internalization is the achieved relocation of governance and does not require a prior optional consultation process.", "slug": "internalization"}], "normalized_requirement": "Awareness, disclosure, or consultation remains optional and consequence-free for the actor who can change the effect.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Awareness, disclosure, or consultation remains optional and consequence-free for the actor who can change the effect.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Boundary critique or impact mapping has identified an externalized effect that is material enough to change responsibility, price, liability, reporting, governance, or design choices.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "In those cases, start with boundary critique, impact mapping, or scope definition. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Boundary critique or impact mapping has identified an externalized effect that is material enough to change responsibility, price, liability, reporting, governance, or design choices. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Boundary critique or impact mapping has identified an externalized effect that is material enough to change responsibility, price, liability, reporting, governance, or design choices.", "In those cases, start with boundary critique, impact mapping, or scope definition."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Boundary critique or impact mapping has identified an externalized effect that is material enough to change responsibility, price, liability, reporting, governance, or design choices."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 28, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-028", "ledger_sha256": "0ce0e7678c55bbc31c122201aaf6440b3e36d4f87f6d1698094d11dbc55393a8"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Face-Saving Directness Calibration", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:face_saving_directness_calibration", "slug": "face_saving_directness_calibration"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 3 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a tension between **message uptake** and **face preservation**. The sender needs the recipient to understand a difficult action, boundary, refusal, criticism, or decision. The recipient also interprets the delivery as a signal about status, dignity, competence, belonging, autonomy, or respect. When that relational signal becomes too threatening, the recipient may defend, withdraw, retaliate, or stop engaging. When the sender overcorrects by becoming indirect, the required message disappears.\n\nThis is why the archetype is not merely about tone. Tone is one surface mechanism. The deeper structure includes the required message, face risk, relational context, directness level, politeness strategy, understanding check, and relationship monitor.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A necessary message sits inside a relational hazard: direct delivery may embarrass, shame, threaten status, escalate conflict, or damage trust, while indirect delivery may obscure the action, refusal, criticism, warning, boundary, or decision that must be understood."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime starts with a face-threatening directive, disagreement, criticism, complaint, or refusal and selects mitigation by its weight.", "role_mapping": "Necessary message -> face-threatening act; threatened dignity -> positive or negative face.", "slug": "pragmatic_politeness_strategies", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b028_a02_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A person must give criticism, corrective feedback, refusal, disagreement, escalation, boundary-setting, or difficult news to someone whose dignity or status may be threatened. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A person must give criticism, corrective feedback, refusal, disagreement, escalation, boundary-setting, or difficult news to someone whose dignity or status may be threatened."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Pragmatic Politeness Strategies", "one_liner": "Maintain harmony.", "page_ref": "prime:pragmatic_politeness_strategies", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Necessary message -> face-threatening act; threatened dignity -> positive or negative face.", "slug": "pragmatic_politeness_strategies", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime starts with a face-threatening directive, disagreement, criticism, complaint, or refusal and selects mitigation by its weight."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A speaker must deliver criticism, refusal, disagreement, escalation, a boundary, or difficult news that threatens face.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P046-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must include a message-delivery interaction, not blunt action in general.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A sender delivers or proposes a message to one or more recipients in a relational setting.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve over-directness or excessive bluntness, not directness alone.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The delivery is excessively blunt relative to the message's relational context.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail relational harm or a severe adverse response, not mere discomfort.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A severe adverse recipient or relationship response follows or is expected to follow.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve the direction from blunt delivery to relational harm.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The excessive bluntness contributes to the adverse response.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve the source's likelihood claim; bare possibility is insufficient and certainty is not required.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The adverse response is likely rather than merely possible or guaranteed.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "A message delivered with excessive bluntness is likely to cause a severe adverse interpersonal or cooperative response.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An overly blunt message is likely to provoke severe relational harm.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P046-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A bald-on-record act can be face-threatening yet efficient and accepted, without any listed severe response.", "slug": "pragmatic_politeness_strategies"}], "residual_id": "r:face_saving_directness_calibration:b028_a02_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b028_a02_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: An overly blunt message would likely trigger defensiveness, retaliation, silence, withdrawal, humiliation, or loss of future cooperation. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["An overly blunt message would likely trigger defensiveness, retaliation, silence, withdrawal, humiliation, or loss of future cooperation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A bald-on-record act can be face-threatening yet efficient and accepted, without any listed severe response.", "slug": "pragmatic_politeness_strategies"}], "normalized_requirement": "An overly blunt message is likely to cause defensiveness, retaliation, silence, withdrawal, humiliation, or lost cooperation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "An overly blunt message is likely to cause defensiveness, retaliation, silence, withdrawal, humiliation, or lost cooperation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P047-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a necessary message and its recipient rather than generic missing information.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A message carrying a necessary ask, refusal, criticism, warning, boundary, decision, or equivalent communicative force is directed to a recipient.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve indirect delivery as the relevant message condition.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The message is delivered with excessive indirectness.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the directed risk from indirectness to nonreceipt or nonrecognition of the message.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The excessive indirectness makes the recipient likely not to register the message.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "An overly indirect necessary message is likely to be missed.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Excessive indirectness makes a necessary message likely to go unregistered by its recipient.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P047-C01-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P047-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve that the message calls for required recognition or action.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The message carries necessary rather than optional communicative force.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve excessive indirectness as the message condition.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The message is delivered with excessive indirectness.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the necessity-to-optionality downgrade rather than mere vagueness.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The recipient is likely to interpret the necessary message as optional.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "An overly indirect necessary message is likely to be treated as optional.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Excessive indirectness makes a necessary message likely to be treated as optional.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P047-C01-U2"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P047-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a non-agreeing intended meaning.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The message's intended force is not agreement, such as a refusal, criticism, warning, boundary, or contrary decision.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve excessive indirectness as the message condition.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The message is delivered with excessive indirectness.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the recipient-side agreement interpretation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The recipient is likely to interpret the message as agreement.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the polarity mismatch rather than a merely incomplete interpretation.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The interpreted agreement conflicts with the message's intended non-agreeing force.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "An overly indirect message is likely to be mistaken for agreement.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Excessive indirectness makes a non-agreeing message likely to be interpreted as agreement.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P047-C01-U3"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P047-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a concrete intended ask or necessary communicative force.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The communication carries an actual ask or equivalent necessary intended action.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve excessive indirectness rather than ordinary interpretation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The communication is excessively indirect.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve absence of explicit statement of the ask.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The actual ask is not stated explicitly in the message.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve inference of the actual ask as the consequence type rather than a different recipient burden.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The relevant recipient-side consequence is an inference requirement: if realized, the recipient must infer the actual ask from the indirect communication.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the source-level likelihood modality and must not strengthen the inference burden into an invariant consequence.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Excessive indirectness makes that recipient inference requirement likely rather than certain.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "An overly indirect message is likely to require the recipient to infer the actual ask.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Excessive indirectness makes it likely that a recipient will have to infer a necessary ask that the message does not state explicitly.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P047-C01-U4"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Pragmatic interpretation can recover an indirect request correctly; it does not require ambiguity or missed force.", "slug": "pragmatics"}], "residual_id": "r:face_saving_directness_calibration:b028_a02_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b028_a02_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: An overly indirect message would likely be missed, treated as optional, interpreted as false agreement, or require the recipient to infer the actual ask. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["An overly indirect message would likely be missed, treated as optional, interpreted as false agreement, or require the recipient to infer the actual ask."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 4, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 4}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Pragmatic interpretation can recover an indirect request correctly; it does not require ambiguity or missed force.", "slug": "pragmatics"}], "normalized_requirement": "An overly indirect message is likely to be missed, treated as optional, or mistaken for agreement.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 4 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "An overly indirect message is likely to be missed, treated as optional, or mistaken for agreement.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Power differences, cultural norms, professional hierarchy, public exposure, prior conflict, or dependency make the same message more face-threatening than it would otherwise be.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is also relevant when hierarchy, public exposure, cultural norms, or prior conflict make ordinary directness feel more threatening than intended. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Power differences, cultural norms, professional hierarchy, public exposure, prior conflict, or dependency make the same message more face-threatening than it would otherwise be. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Power differences, cultural norms, professional hierarchy, public exposure, prior conflict, or dependency make the same message more face-threatening than it would otherwise be.", "It is also relevant when hierarchy, public exposure, cultural norms, or prior conflict make ordinary directness feel more threatening than intended."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "Power differences, cultural norms, professional hierarchy, public exposure, prior conflict, or dependency make the same message more face-threatening than it would otherwise be."}, {"display_text": "The speaker needs to preserve psychological safety or relationship continuity while still enforcing a standard, decision, boundary, or request.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A message must be strong enough to create understanding and action, but the social form of the message can either preserve or unnecessarily attack the recipient’s dignity, status, autonomy, and relationship to the speaker. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: The speaker needs to preserve psychological safety or relationship continuity while still enforcing a standard, decision, boundary, or request. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The speaker needs to preserve psychological safety or relationship continuity while still enforcing a standard, decision, boundary, or request.", "A message must be strong enough to create understanding and action, but the social form of the message can either preserve or unnecessarily attack the recipient’s dignity, status, autonomy, and relationship to the speaker."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The speaker needs to preserve psychological safety or relationship continuity while still enforcing a standard, decision, boundary, or request."}, {"display_text": "The organization has recurring feedback, refusal, conflict, or escalation patterns that either damage relationships or avoid necessary clarity.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It fits performance feedback, negotiation, diplomatic disagreement, customer refusal, policy enforcement, clinical recommendations, classroom correction, community moderation, and conflict conversations where both clarity and relationship continuity matter. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The organization has recurring feedback, refusal, conflict, or escalation patterns that either damage relationships or avoid necessary clarity. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The organization has recurring feedback, refusal, conflict, or escalation patterns that either damage relationships or avoid necessary clarity.", "It fits performance feedback, negotiation, diplomatic disagreement, customer refusal, policy enforcement, clinical recommendations, classroom correction, community moderation, and conflict conversations where both clarity and relationship continuity matter."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The organization has recurring feedback, refusal, conflict, or escalation patterns that either damage relationships or avoid necessary clarity."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 28, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-028", "ledger_sha256": "0ce0e7678c55bbc31c122201aaf6440b3e36d4f87f6d1698094d11dbc55393a8"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": [{"groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A low-distance, equal-power, low-imposition exchange can still be analyzed by face management while no contextual factor is elevated enough to increase threat. The threshold qualifier removes that counterexample without adding a second mechanism.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Face Management", "one_liner": "Do the moment-by-moment interactional work of protecting both parties' public self-image against face-threatening acts, selecting a redress strategy from an ordered ladder whose rung is set by the social distance, relative power, and imposition size of the act.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:face_management", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O3", "O4"], "guard_type": "THRESHOLD_CROSSING", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "fta_weight_variable_elevated", "predicate": "At least one FTA-weight variable is elevated relative to the otherwise-equal comparison context.", "rationale": "The retained structural spine and one candidate-anchored atomic qualifier jointly force a complete DNF branch without laundering."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "face_management"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "fta_weight_variable_elevated"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "face_management", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P046-C14-U1", "why_it_fits": "The candidate supplies the same-message face-threat function, and one threshold condition selects contexts in which that function amplifies threat."}], "publication_role": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT_ONLY", "source_residual_occurrence_id": "r:face_saving_directness_calibration:b028_a02_c2", "unit": {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P046-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must include a message and the relational context in which it lands.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A message is delivered or contemplated within a relationship or social setting.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must contain a relational condition capable of altering face threat.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A contextual factor such as power, culture, hierarchy, publicity, conflict, or dependency is present.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve the same-message comparison, not merely high absolute threat.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The same message is more face-threatening under that condition than under a relevant otherwise-equal baseline.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve the direction from relational context to amplified face threat.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The contextual factor contributes to the increase in face threat.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Power, culture, hierarchy, publicity, prior conflict, dependency, or comparable relational context increases the face threat of the same message.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Relational context amplifies a message's face threat.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P046-C14-U1"}}]}
{"archetype": {"name": "Fail-Safe Default", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:fail_safe_default", "slug": "fail_safe_default"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is not merely failure. It is **unsafe continuation under failure**. A system may fail active, fail permissive, fail ambiguous, or fail in a way that leaves dangerous authority in place. A stuck actuator may keep moving. A software workflow may keep writing suspect data. An access-control system may grant privileges because verification is unavailable. A public agency may continue an automated decision process after anomaly signals show that outputs can no longer be trusted.\n\nIn each case, the system needs a boundary where ordinary action loses permission. Past that boundary, safety outranks availability, productivity, speed, or convenience.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system can fail in a way that keeps acting, remains energized, permits dangerous access, releases harmful output, traps people, corrupts state, or leaves operators unsure whether continuation is safe."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact pattern identifies critical-consequence failure modes and routes control failure away from catastrophe.", "role_mapping": "Unsafe continuation -> critical failure consequence.", "slug": "fail_safe", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b028_a03_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Unsafe continuation is possible. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Unsafe continuation is possible"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Fail-Safe", "one_liner": "Default to safe state on failure.", "page_ref": "prime:fail_safe", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Unsafe continuation -> critical failure consequence.", "slug": "fail_safe", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact pattern identifies critical-consequence failure modes and routes control failure away from catastrophe."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A critical failure can otherwise permit unsafe continuation, energy, access, output, or state.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Definition of the safe state for each critical failure mode is mandatory.", "role_mapping": "Least-harm state -> predetermined safe state.", "slug": "fail_safe", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b028_a03_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The least harmful state can be named. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The least harmful state can be named"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Fail-Safe", "one_liner": "Default to safe state on failure.", "page_ref": "prime:fail_safe", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Least-harm state -> predetermined safe state.", "slug": "fail_safe", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Definition of the safe state for each critical failure mode is mandatory."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A least-harm state can be named for the relevant failure mode.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P047-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve safe-state entry before the hazard-recreating action.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The system has already entered a safe state.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a hazard that the safe state was meant to control.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A prior hazard has been suppressed or excluded by that safe state.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For the restart branch, a candidate must preserve restart of the same system after safe-state entry.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A restart is performed after safe-state entry.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For the restart branch, a candidate must preserve possible hazard recreation caused by restart.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The restart can recreate the suppressed hazard.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For the override branch, a candidate must preserve an override affecting the same protected system.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "An override is invoked after safe-state entry.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For the override branch, a candidate must preserve possible hazard recreation caused by override.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The override can recreate the suppressed hazard.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "Restart or override can recreate a hazard after safe-state entry.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "After a system enters a safe state, either restart or override can recreate the suppressed hazard.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P047-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A fail-safe system can remain safe on every controlled restart and have no hazardous override path.", "slug": "fail_safe"}], "residual_id": "r:fail_safe_default:b028_a03_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b028_a03_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Restart or override can recreate the hazard. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Restart or override can recreate the hazard"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A fail-safe system can remain safe on every controlled restart and have no hazardous override path.", "slug": "fail_safe"}], "normalized_requirement": "Restart or override can recreate the hazard after safe-state entry.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Restart or override can recreate the hazard after safe-state entry.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Failure may be ambiguous or fast-moving.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Failure may be ambiguous or fast-moving. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Failure may be ambiguous or fast-moving"]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Failure may be ambiguous or fast-moving"}, {"display_text": "Human response may be delayed or overloaded.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Human response may be delayed or overloaded. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Human response may be delayed or overloaded"]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Human response may be delayed or overloaded"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 28, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-028", "ledger_sha256": "0ce0e7678c55bbc31c122201aaf6440b3e36d4f87f6d1698094d11dbc55393a8"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Failover", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:failover", "slug": "failover"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 1 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 1}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Essential function depends on a vulnerable primary path whose failure or degradation would interrupt service.", "explanation_source": {"field": "diagnostic_head", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Essential function depends on a vulnerable primary path whose failure or degradation would interrupt service."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "This branch preserves the complete remedy-free diagnostic route; goals, feasibility clauses, gates, deployment constraints, and supporting context remain outside the DNF."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A single point of failure is necessarily a component on every critical path with no parallel route, so its loss interrupts an essential function.", "role_mapping": "The articulation node maps to the primary component or path; the disconnected essential function maps to the interrupted service.", "slug": "single_point_of_failure", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "ext001_failover_a01", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored essence_one_line, compression_statement, components fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: A primary component, path, authority, provider, channel, or process is a single point of interruption for essential function.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A primary component, path, authority, provider, channel, or process is a single point of interruption for essential function."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Single Point of Failure", "one_liner": "A component on the critical path of every essential function, with no parallel route, that caps the whole system's reliability at its own.", "page_ref": "prime:single_point_of_failure", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "The articulation node maps to the primary component or path; the disconnected essential function maps to the interrupted service.", "slug": "single_point_of_failure", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A single point of failure is necessarily a component on every critical path with no parallel route, so its loss interrupts an essential function."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A primary component, path, authority, provider, channel, or process is a single point of interruption for essential function.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "An alternate path can assume the protected function when the primary is unavailable.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored essence_one_line, compression_statement, components fields; the source file was not modified. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: An alternate path can assume the protected function when the primary is unavailable. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["An alternate path can assume the protected function when the primary is unavailable.", "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored essence_one_line, compression_statement, components fields; the source file was not modified."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "An alternate path can assume the protected function when the primary is unavailable."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"candidate_ledger_sha256": "96f72d2139077fd57bf795048ebef33b3fd574b20963170080ec916b5b3b92fe", "extension_id": "new-archetypes-extension-001", "ledger_id": "prime-production-v1.2-extension-001", "ledger_sha256": "9644520614744632d1d36da44b1acd77ce432852c6083eb871203521c166efce"}, "base_projection_sha256": "841e0c7f3cb8e8054475ad29a8a14745a416b4fc115559a44878b94292e673ec", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "ca09ed9fe1598ce7072755b530de5553f5ee0a7cd64ae82d9e4a4e2149a37788", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Failure Mode Anticipation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:failure_mode_anticipation", "slug": "failure_mode_anticipation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is late discovery of foreseeable failure. A team moves from idea to implementation while treating failure as a vague possibility rather than a set of concrete paths. Once the solution is built, shipped, funded, institutionalized, or regulated, those paths become harder to remove.\n\nThis happens because design attention naturally focuses on intended function. People ask what the system should do, how it should be built, and whether the main path works. Failure Mode Anticipation adds the missing negative-space analysis: how could the function not happen, happen wrongly, happen too late, harm the wrong people, escape detection, or create cascading consequences?", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Failure is discovered after implementation because likely failure paths were not systematically identified in advance."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "FMEA can enumerate low-severity modes; none of the listed material consequences is required.", "slug": "failure_mode_and_effects_analysis_fmea"}], "residual_id": "r:failure_mode_anticipation:b028_a04_c2", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b028_a04_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Failure could produce harm, outage, rework, exclusion, liability, loss of trust, wasted resources, or irreversible downstream effects. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Failure could produce harm, outage, rework, exclusion, liability, loss of trust, wasted resources, or irreversible downstream effects."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "FMEA can enumerate low-severity modes; none of the listed material consequences is required.", "slug": "failure_mode_and_effects_analysis_fmea"}], "normalized_requirement": "A failure could cause material harm, outage, rework, exclusion, liability, lost trust, waste, or irreversible effects.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A failure could cause material harm, outage, rework, exclusion, liability, lost trust, waste, or irreversible effects.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A defined one-component or one-step design can receive FMEA without multiple interacting dependencies.", "slug": "failure_mode_and_effects_analysis_fmea"}], "residual_id": "r:failure_mode_anticipation:b028_a04_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b028_a04_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The solution depends on multiple components, handoffs, roles, incentives, assumptions, data flows, or environmental conditions. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The solution depends on multiple components, handoffs, roles, incentives, assumptions, data flows, or environmental conditions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A defined one-component or one-step design can receive FMEA without multiple interacting dependencies.", "slug": "failure_mode_and_effects_analysis_fmea"}], "normalized_requirement": "The solution depends on multiple components, handoffs, roles, incentives, data flows, assumptions, or environments.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The solution depends on multiple components, handoffs, roles, incentives, data flows, assumptions, or environments.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P047-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a team making a future-performance judgment about a design.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A team is assessing whether a focal design will work in the future.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve expertise, authority, or expert status as the invoked basis.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Expertise is the evidentiary basis the team invokes.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve substitution of expertise for proof of design success.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The team treats that expertise as sufficient proof that the design will work.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "A team treats expertise as proof that a design will work.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A team treats expertise as sufficient proof of a design's future success.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P047-C06-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P047-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a team making a future-performance judgment about a design.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A team is assessing whether a focal design will work in the future.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve enthusiasm rather than evidence about design performance.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Enthusiasm or affective confidence is the evidentiary basis the team invokes.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve substitution of enthusiasm for proof of design success.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The team treats that enthusiasm as sufficient proof that the design will work.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "A team treats enthusiasm as proof that a design will work.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A team treats enthusiasm as sufficient proof of a design's future success.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P047-C06-U2"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P047-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a team making a future-performance judgment about a design.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A team is assessing whether a focal design will work in the future.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve formal regulatory compliance rather than demonstrated design performance.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The design's regulatory compliance is the evidentiary basis the team invokes.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve substitution of regulatory compliance for proof of design success.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The team treats that compliance as sufficient proof that the design will work.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "A team treats regulatory compliance as proof that a design will work.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A team treats regulatory compliance as sufficient proof of a design's future success.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P047-C06-U3"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P047-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a team making a future-performance judgment about a design.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A team is assessing whether a focal design will work in the future.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve standard procedure or conventional process as the invoked basis.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Conformity to a standard procedure is the evidentiary basis the team invokes.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve substitution of standard procedure for proof of design success.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The team treats that procedural conformity as sufficient proof that the design will work.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "A team treats standard procedure as proof that a design will work.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A team treats conformity to standard procedure as sufficient proof of a design's future success.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P047-C06-U4"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime can be performed by a skeptical team that makes no such proof claim.", "slug": "failure_mode_and_effects_analysis_fmea"}], "residual_id": "r:failure_mode_anticipation:b028_a04_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b028_a04_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The team is relying on expertise, enthusiasm, regulatory compliance, or standard procedure as proof that the design will work. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The team is relying on expertise, enthusiasm, regulatory compliance, or standard procedure as proof that the design will work."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 4, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 4}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime can be performed by a skeptical team that makes no such proof claim.", "slug": "failure_mode_and_effects_analysis_fmea"}], "normalized_requirement": "The team treats expertise, enthusiasm, compliance, or standard procedure as proof the design will work.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 4 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The team treats expertise, enthusiasm, compliance, or standard procedure as proof the design will work.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A design is about to move from concept, prototype, or plan into committed implementation.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Design requires committing to a path despite uncertainty, but implementation exposes hidden assumptions, dependencies, and edge cases. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: A design is about to move from concept, prototype, or plan into committed implementation. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A design is about to move from concept, prototype, or plan into committed implementation.", "Design requires committing to a path despite uncertainty, but implementation exposes hidden assumptions, dependencies, and edge cases."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "A design is about to move from concept, prototype, or plan into committed implementation."}, {"display_text": "Past incidents, near misses, complaints, defects, support tickets, or workarounds suggest recurrent vulnerabilities.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Past incidents, near misses, complaints, defects, support tickets, or workarounds suggest recurrent vulnerabilities. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Past incidents, near misses, complaints, defects, support tickets, or workarounds suggest recurrent vulnerabilities."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Past incidents, near misses, complaints, defects, support tickets, or workarounds suggest recurrent vulnerabilities."}, {"display_text": "The implementation context will vary across sites, users, loads, conditions, jurisdictions, or time.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The implementation context will vary across sites, users, loads, conditions, jurisdictions, or time. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The implementation context will vary across sites, users, loads, conditions, jurisdictions, or time."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The implementation context will vary across sites, users, loads, conditions, jurisdictions, or time."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 28, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-028", "ledger_sha256": "0ce0e7678c55bbc31c122201aaf6440b3e36d4f87f6d1698094d11dbc55393a8"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": [{"groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Tried to instantiate a complete active_failure without already-observed operational trouble warranting inference of an underlying vulnerability capable of recurring; the exact defining roles and relation still supply one entire DNF branch, so the counterexample fails.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Active Failure", "one_liner": "The frontline operator's act at the sharp end that completes a hazard path by aligning with holes latent conditions had pre-positioned in a system's layered defenses — the proximate, visible half of Reason's Swiss cheese model.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:active_failure", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "active_failure"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "active_failure", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P047-C05-U1", "why_it_fits": "Exact-record entailment is complete and polarity-preserving. The visible sharp-end act maps to observed operational failure evidence; the pre-positioned latent defense holes map to the underlying vulnerability, and the exact record says those holes remain ready to recur under an operator-only response."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AUDITED_SHARED_NEGATIVE", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "I tested a merely prospective readiness concern, but that is not a complete exact-record timing-risk instance, which requires a technically sound intervention to fail because the readiness window is wrong.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Timing Risk", "one_liner": "The failure mode where a technically sound product, technology, or policy fails not from its own defects but because the surrounding environment is not yet — or is no longer — ready to absorb it, treating environmental readiness as a risk factor independent of execution.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:timing_risk", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "timing_risk"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "timing_risk", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P047-C05-U1", "why_it_fits": "Exact audit rescues this shared negative: the DSA's realized failure is operational evidence that directly warrants a recurrent environmental-readiness vulnerability."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Tried to instantiate a complete heisenbug without already-observed operational trouble warranting inference of an underlying vulnerability capable of recurring; the exact defining roles and relation still supply one entire DNF branch, so the counterexample fails.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Heisenbug", "one_liner": "Name the software defect whose failure vanishes under observation because attaching a debugger, adding a print, or disabling optimization perturbs the timing window or interleaving it rides on — so disappearance-under-observation is the diagnostic tell, not evidence the bug is gone.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:heisenbug", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "heisenbug"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "heisenbug", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P047-C05-U1", "why_it_fits": "Exact-record entailment is complete and polarity-preserving. The production failure is the observed trouble, the timing/interleaving-sensitive defect is the inferred vulnerability, and its repeatability in principle supplies recurrence capability."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Tried to instantiate a complete mandelbug without already-observed operational trouble warranting inference of an underlying vulnerability capable of recurring; the exact defining roles and relation still supply one entire DNF branch, so the counterexample fails.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Mandelbug", "one_liner": "Reclassify a chaotic, irreproducible software defect as deterministic-but-undersampled — triggered by a rare joint configuration of hidden state — so effort shifts from finding the right breakpoint to sampling that joint state until the configuration is caught.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:mandelbug", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "mandelbug"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "mandelbug", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P047-C05-U1", "why_it_fits": "Exact-record entailment is complete and polarity-preserving. Irregular operational failures are observed evidence of a deterministic hidden-state defect; the rare joint configuration and statistical-reproduction prescription directly preserve recurrence potential."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_SYNTHESIS", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "An undetected medication deviation preserves the DSA while failing prior observation; the emitted guard excludes it, and the exact degraded-defense mechanism then supplies vulnerability and recurrence.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Medication Error", "one_liner": "Any preventable deviation in the medication-use pipeline that could expose a patient to unintended pharmacologic action, whether or not harm results — a defence-in-depth failure whose harm rate is the product of escape probabilities across every stage, so leverage lies in downstream catch rates, not upstream error counts.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:medication_error", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "MODALITY_ACTUALIZATION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "medication_error_observed_in_operation", "predicate": "The medication error or near miss has been observed in operation.", "rationale": "The observation guard is anchored to the candidate's reportable error/near-miss role, fills only O1, and leaves no complete guarded instance that lacks the unit's evidence relation."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "medication_error"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The medication error or near miss has been observed in operation."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "medication_error", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P047-C05-U1", "why_it_fits": "The direct proposal overstates observation, but the exact record has the full evidence-to-recurrent-vulnerability spine once one atomic observed-in-operation guard is added."}], "publication_role": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT_ONLY", "source_residual_occurrence_id": "r:failure_mode_anticipation:b028_a04_c4", "unit": {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P047-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve historical or field-observed evidence rather than wholly prospective analysis.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Operational evidence has already been observed in the focal system or process.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve evidence of operational trouble rather than generic usage data.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The evidence manifests a defect, failure, near failure, complaint, ticket, or compensating workaround.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve evidence-to-vulnerability warrant without strengthening suggestion to conclusive proof.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The evidence supports an inference about an underlying vulnerability.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve recurrence potential rather than a closed one-off event.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The inferred vulnerability is capable of recurring.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "Past operational evidence suggests a vulnerability capable of recurring.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Observed operational evidence supports an inference that a vulnerability can recur.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P047-C05-U1"}}, {"groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A retired interface can preserve the complete progressive-disclosure failure while having no future deployment, so O4 is not direct. Once continued service is imposed, the exact heterogeneous population makes future context variation unavoidable.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Progressive-Disclosure Failure", "one_liner": "Diagnose an interface's usability breakdowns as a single mistuning between its staging schedule and the readiness of the users and tasks it actually meets, read off by whether too much is hidden or too much exposed.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:progressive_disclosure_failure", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O4"], "guard_type": "TIMING_BINDING", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "staged_interface_continues_serving_heterogeneous_population", "predicate": "The staged interface will continue to serve its heterogeneous user-and-task population in future implementation.", "rationale": "The timing guard is anchored to the exact interface-population relation and adds only future continuation; no laundering is present."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "progressive_disclosure_failure"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The staged interface will continue to serve its heterogeneous user-and-task population in future implementation."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "progressive_disclosure_failure", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P047-C07-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record directly supplies one interface across heterogeneous user/task contexts. The single timing qualifier preserves the source's prospective modality without adding another role or relation."}], "publication_role": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT_ONLY", "source_residual_occurrence_id": "r:failure_mode_anticipation:b028_a04_c6", "unit": {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P047-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve plural contexts for one implementation.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The same implementation is used or expected to be used in at least two deployment contexts.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve cross-context difference rather than several identical deployments.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Those contexts differ from one another.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve implementation-context variation, not an unrelated difference.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The difference concerns a deployment dimension such as site, user, load, condition, jurisdiction, or time.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the source's prospective will-vary modality.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The context variation is expected in future implementation.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "The same implementation will face varying deployment contexts.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "The same implementation will operate across deployment contexts that differ on one or more dimensions.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P047-C07-U1"}}]}
{"archetype": {"name": "Fairness-Standard Selection and Reconciliation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:fairness_standard_selection_and_reconciliation", "slug": "fairness_standard_selection_and_reconciliation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 4, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 2, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 2, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 2 of 4 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Participants often say “fair” while using different comparison classes, baselines, horizons, and principles. A neutral-looking current distribution can encode inherited advantage. Equal treatment can reproduce unequal opportunity. Equity adjustments can become unbounded. One group metric can improve while individuals or intersecting groups bear severe harm.\n\nThe problem is not eliminated by data. Evidence estimates consequences; it does not select the values that should control. Normative choice must be authorized, reasoned, challengeable, and revised when predicted effects fail.\n\n### Stakeholders and claims\n\nMap direct recipients, burden bearers, people excluded before application, dependents, workers who implement the rule, future parties, communities exposed to externalities, and institutions responsible for remedy. For each, record the claimed good, burden, opportunity, recognition, right, need, contribution, responsibility, expectation, and standing. Distinguish a person's interest from the fairness principle offered to support it.\n\nRepresentation is not equivalent to presence. Some affected parties cannot attend, face retaliation, lack technical language, or are not yet identifiable. Use advocates, sampling, accessible formats, independent research, or future-party representation, while disclosing the limits of proxy voice. Powerful incumbents should not receive more normative weight merely because they can produce more evidence or participate continuously.\n\n### Baseline and reference class\n\n“Equal” always means equal relative to something. Candidate baselines include current holdings, equal initial claims, prior entitlement, need absent intervention, contribution, expected counterfactual outcome, rights guarantee, historical exclusion, or a sufficiency threshold. The status quo is an empirical condition, not automatically the morally neutral reference.\n\nReference classes determine who counts as like whom. Comparing only current applicants can hide people deterred by cost or prior exclusion; comparing workers in the same title can hide unequal opportunity to acquire qualifying experience; comparing model errors within broad groups can hide intersectional tails. Define inclusion, exclusion, and granularity and test how conclusions change under plausible alternatives.\n\n### Criteria and incompatibility\n\nEqual shares treats claims symmetrically. Need directs more to those who require more. Contribution and desert respond to input or responsibility. Proportionality relates burden or benefit to a relevant quantity. Priority improves the position of the worse-off even when total gains are lower. Sufficiency protects a minimum. Reciprocity considers mutual obligation. Equal opportunity focuses on access or prospects. Historical repair responds to inherited wrongful disadvantage. Procedures, rights, and individual treatment add further constraints.\n\nThese criteria can be jointly unsatisfiable. Scarcity can prevent both equal shares and sufficiency. Classification base rates can prevent calibration and equal error rates simultaneously. Need priority can conflict with maximizing expected benefit. Responsibility-based burdens can conflict with ability to pay. Reconciliation begins by proving or demonstrating the conflict rather than implying that a better metric will dissolve it.\n\n### Measurement and proxy bias\n\nOperational measures are imperfect translations of normative concepts. A test score may proxy prior opportunity rather than merit; healthcare utilization may proxy access rather than need; arrests may proxy enforcement rather than offending; application time may proxy digital access; performance ratings may encode manager discretion. Validate construct, data generation, missingness, measurement invariance, and feedback before using a feature as a relevant difference.\n\nProtected traits and correlated proxies require heightened scrutiny, but removing them from the model does not remove structural bias. They may be needed to detect disparities or design repair. Separate use for decision, audit, representation, and remedy; apply purpose limitation and privacy safeguards.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A consequential decision allocates benefits or burdens, classifies people, opens opportunities, imposes rules, or supplies remedy, but participants invoke fairness without agreeing on the unit, baseline, comparison class, relevant differences, time horizon, or normative standard. Hidden choices are embedded in weights, thresholds, eligibility, metrics, defaults, and exceptions."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P047-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve plural claimants or positions.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "At least two parties or stakeholder positions are present.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve claimant-to-stake relations, not generic disagreement.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Each party advances a claim to an allocated benefit, burden, opportunity, recognition, remedy, or equivalent stake.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a shared decision setting in which the claims meet.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The claims concern the same consequential decision or allocation setting.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve positive plausibility for the conflicting sides.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The competing claims are each plausible rather than facially invalid.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve incompatibility among the claims.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The claims conflict and cannot all be satisfied as stated.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Multiple parties advance plausible claims that conflict within one consequential decision.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "At least two parties advance individually plausible but mutually conflicting claims within the same consequential decision.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P047-C08-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A fairness judgment can apply one uncontested standard to comparable parties without active conflicting claims.", "slug": "fairness"}], "residual_id": "r:fairness_standard_selection_and_reconciliation:b028_a05_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b028_a05_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Multiple parties have plausible but conflicting claims to benefits, burdens, opportunities, recognition, or remedy. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Multiple parties have plausible but conflicting claims to benefits, burdens, opportunities, recognition, or remedy."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A fairness judgment can apply one uncontested standard to comparable parties without active conflicting claims.", "slug": "fairness"}], "normalized_requirement": "Multiple parties make plausible conflicting claims to benefits, burdens, opportunities, recognition, or remedy.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Multiple parties make plausible conflicting claims to benefits, burdens, opportunities, recognition, or remedy.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P047-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the same decision as the target of both standards.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "One focal consequential decision or allocation is under evaluation.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve equal treatment as one decision rule.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "One fairness standard favors equal treatment across the relevant parties or cases.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve equitable or relevant-difference treatment as the comparison rule.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A second fairness standard favors differentiation based on relevant differences.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve divergence between the two outcomes rather than coexistence or agreement.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The two standards prescribe or produce different results for that decision.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Equal treatment and equitable differentiation yield different results for the same decision.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "For the same decision, an equal-treatment standard and a relevant-difference standard prescribe different results.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P047-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Fairness can concern cases where equality and relevant-difference treatment coincide.", "slug": "fairness"}], "residual_id": "r:fairness_standard_selection_and_reconciliation:b028_a05_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b028_a05_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Equal treatment and equitable differentiation point to different results. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Equal treatment and equitable differentiation point to different results."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Fairness can concern cases where equality and relevant-difference treatment coincide.", "slug": "fairness"}], "normalized_requirement": "Equal treatment and equitable differentiation yield different results.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Equal treatment and equitable differentiation yield different results.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P047-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a decision-shaping formal artifact.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A formal criterion is used to evaluate, rank, select, allocate, or optimize outcomes.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For the metric branch, a candidate must preserve a metric used in the decision structure.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The formal criterion is a metric.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For the optimization branch, a candidate must preserve a rule that determines what is optimized.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The formal criterion is an optimization rule.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve formal-criterion-to-value-priority encoding.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The criterion encodes priorities among values or outcomes.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the hidden or implicit status of the priorities.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Those value priorities are not stated explicitly in the criterion's presentation.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "A metric or optimization rule encodes implicit value priorities.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A formal decision criterion encodes value priorities that it does not state explicitly.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P047-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Fairness can govern a qualitative procedure with no metric or optimization rule.", "slug": "fairness"}], "residual_id": "r:fairness_standard_selection_and_reconciliation:b028_a05_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b028_a05_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Metrics or optimization rules encode implicit value priorities. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Metrics or optimization rules encode implicit value priorities."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "If the loss explicitly weights the operational minority according to its asymmetric error cost, the majority-dominance mechanism defining class imbalance is removed.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Class Imbalance", "one_liner": "Diagnose why a 99%-accurate classifier can be useless: when one class vastly outnumbers the class of interest, additive loss aggregation lets majority examples dominate the gradient, so the model learns to ignore the rare minority.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:class_imbalance", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "class_imbalance"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "class_imbalance", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P047-C10-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires an additive objective whose nominally uniform aggregation lets majority counts dominate an operationally important minority while asymmetric error costs remain implicit. This directly satisfies the optimization-rule DNF branch."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A metric or optimization rule encodes implicit value priorities.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P047-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve comparable fairness assessments within one decision domain.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The same decision domain or allocation process is assessed at more than one scope.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the single-decision baseline.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "One fairness assessment is made for a single decision.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For the longitudinal branch, a candidate must preserve a temporal aggregation of fairness.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A comparison fairness assessment aggregates outcomes over time.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For the longitudinal branch, a candidate must preserve possible divergence from the baseline.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The longitudinal fairness result can differ from the single-decision result.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For the portfolio branch, a candidate must preserve portfolio-level aggregation of fairness.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "A comparison fairness assessment aggregates outcomes across a portfolio of decisions.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For the portfolio branch, a candidate must preserve possible divergence from the baseline.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The portfolio fairness result can differ from the single-decision result.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "A single-decision fairness result can differ from a longitudinal or portfolio fairness result.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Fairness at single-decision scope can differ from fairness at either longitudinal or portfolio scope.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P047-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A one-shot fairness standard can agree with the longitudinal or portfolio result.", "slug": "fairness"}], "residual_id": "r:fairness_standard_selection_and_reconciliation:b028_a05_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b028_a05_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Fairness over one decision can differ from fairness over time or across a portfolio. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Fairness over one decision can differ from fairness over time or across a portfolio."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Without the guard, a composition fallacy may concern mass, cost, or team skill. With the fairness-from-decisions-to-portfolio typing enforced, a complete instance cannot deny possible scope divergence without restoring the preservation rule and ceasing to be the candidate.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Fallacy of Composition", "one_liner": "Infer that a predicate established for one or all parts must hold of the whole they form, without a warranted preservation rule across aggregation, interaction, scale, configuration, or shared constraints.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:fallacy_of_composition", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1", "O2", "O5", "O6"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "composition_inference_maps_single_decision_fairness_to_portfolio", "predicate": "The composition inference transfers fairness from individual decisions to the portfolio composed of those decisions.", "rationale": "The single domain typing maps the candidate's existing parts-predicate-whole relation to decision fairness and portfolio scope; generic possible non-preservation supplies the result divergence."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "fallacy_of_composition"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The composition inference transfers fairness from individual decisions to the portfolio composed of those decisions."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "fallacy_of_composition", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P047-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record supplies the entire part-predicate-whole non-preservation spine. One atomic domain restriction binds that existing spine to single-decision and portfolio fairness, completing the portfolio DNF branch."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Fairness for one decision differs from fairness over time or across a portfolio.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Historical disadvantage, need, contribution, risk, responsibility, or rights may be relevant.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "For each, record the claimed good, burden, opportunity, recognition, right, need, contribution, responsibility, expectation, and standing. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Historical disadvantage, need, contribution, risk, responsibility, or rights may be relevant. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Historical disadvantage, need, contribution, risk, responsibility, or rights may be relevant.", "For each, record the claimed good, burden, opportunity, recognition, right, need, contribution, responsibility, expectation, and standing."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Historical disadvantage, need, contribution, risk, responsibility, or rights may be relevant."}, {"display_text": "A decision must be explainable and challengeable across heterogeneous stakeholders.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: A decision must be explainable and challengeable across heterogeneous stakeholders. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A decision must be explainable and challengeable across heterogeneous stakeholders."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "A decision must be explainable and challengeable across heterogeneous stakeholders."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 28, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-028", "ledger_sha256": "0ce0e7678c55bbc31c122201aaf6440b3e36d4f87f6d1698094d11dbc55393a8"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "False Convergence Prevention", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:false_convergence_prevention", "slug": "false_convergence_prevention"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 4, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 2, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 2 of 4 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a mismatch between visible stability and actual validity. The process seems to have converged, but the observation layer, social layer, search path, or evidence base may be hiding unresolved nonconvergence.\n\nA group may agree because disagreement is unsafe. A model may appear stable because it has been tuned to its training cases. A policy metric may stabilize because the measure excludes hard cases. A design may appear settled because early choices narrowed the option space too quickly. In each case, the system has a stable surface and an unstable or untested underside.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "The system appears stable, agreed, optimized, or ready to close, but the apparent convergence may be misleading because important variation, uncertainty, disagreement, context-dependence, or error has become invisible."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P047-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a result and its own validation process.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A focal result is undergoing or awaiting validation.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve apparent stability rather than validated actual stability.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The result appears stable or converged without stability yet being established by completed validation.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve incomplete validation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Validation of the result is not yet complete.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the stated temporal order.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The appearance of stability occurs before validation completion.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "A result appears stable while its validation remains incomplete.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A result appears stable before validation of that result is complete.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P047-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A no-failure record can be gathered under a fully completed validation plan; premature closure is not mandatory.", "slug": "empirical_no_failure_anchor"}], "residual_id": "r:false_convergence_prevention:b028_a06_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b028_a06_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A stable result appears before validation is complete. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A stable result appears before validation is complete"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A no-failure record can be gathered under a fully completed validation plan; premature closure is not mandatory.", "slug": "empirical_no_failure_anchor"}], "normalized_requirement": "A result appears stable before validation is complete.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A result appears stable before validation is complete.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Premature consensus, conformity pressure, dissent suppression, and underweighting private information are defining components.", "role_mapping": "Pressure consensus -> premature consensus and conformity; hidden variation -> suppressed private evidence.", "slug": "groupthink", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b028_a06_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Consensus forms under pressure. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Consensus forms under pressure"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Groupthink", "one_liner": "Conformity overrides realism.", "page_ref": "prime:groupthink", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Pressure consensus -> premature consensus and conformity; hidden variation -> suppressed private evidence.", "slug": "groupthink", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Premature consensus, conformity pressure, dissent suppression, and underweighting private information are defining components."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Consensus forms through cohesion-driven pressure that suppresses private evidence and dissent.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact failure deploys a calibrated apparatus outside its sampled regime while its in-regime confidence reporting remains unchanged.", "role_mapping": "Tuned region -> sampled regime; outside use -> regime exit.", "slug": "extrapolation_beyond_sampled_regime", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b028_a06_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A model or policy performs well only where it was tuned. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A model or policy performs well only where it was tuned"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Extrapolation Beyond Sampled Regime", "one_liner": "A calibrated apparatus is deployed against inputs outside the regime its calibration was established in, while continuing to report the same confidence indicators it would report inside the regime, so its own self-reporting is structurally blind to the regime exit.", "page_ref": "prime:extrapolation_beyond_sampled_regime", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Tuned region -> sampled regime; outside use -> regime exit.", "slug": "extrapolation_beyond_sampled_regime", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact failure deploys a calibrated apparatus outside its sampled regime while its in-regime confidence reporting remains unchanged."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A model or policy is deployed beyond the regime where its apparent performance was established.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A law-of-large-numbers process can have a degenerate zero-variance distribution; consequential residual variation is not mandatory.", "slug": "law_of_large_numbers"}], "residual_id": "r:false_convergence_prevention:b028_a06_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b028_a06_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Averages look stable while residual variation remains. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Averages look stable while residual variation remains"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A law-of-large-numbers process can have a degenerate zero-variance distribution; consequential residual variation is not mandatory.", "slug": "law_of_large_numbers"}], "normalized_requirement": "Aggregate averages look stable while consequential residual variation remains.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Aggregate averages look stable while consequential residual variation remains.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "DISJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The process has strong closure momentum.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The process has strong closure momentum. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The process has strong closure momentum"]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The process has strong closure momentum"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 28, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-028", "ledger_sha256": "0ce0e7678c55bbc31c122201aaf6440b3e36d4f87f6d1698094d11dbc55393a8"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Fast/Slow Path Routing", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:fast_slow_path_routing", "slug": "fast_slow_path_routing"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A single treatment path is being used for cases with very different frequency, cost, ambiguity, and risk profiles. If the path is optimized for the common case, rare or high-stakes exceptions are under-examined. If the path is optimized for exceptions, ordinary cases are burdened by unnecessary delay, cost, expertise, or bureaucracy. Without explicit routing, the system oscillates between over-processing the routine and under-protecting the exceptional.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A single treatment path is being used for cases with very different frequency, cost, ambiguity, and risk profiles. If the path is optimized for the common case, rare or high-stakes exceptions are under-examined. If the path is optimized for exceptions, ordinary cases are burdened by unnecessary delay, cost, expertise, or bureaucracy. Without explicit routing, the system oscillates between over-processing the routine and under-protecting the exceptional."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A frequency-skewed difficulty distribution is the exact architecture's precondition.", "role_mapping": "Routine majority -> common cases; exceptional minority -> slow-path cases.", "slug": "fast_path_slow_path_architecture", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b028_a07_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The case stream contains many routine low-risk items and a smaller set of ambiguous, rare, adversarial, irreversible, or high-impact items. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The case stream contains many routine low-risk items and a smaller set of ambiguous, rare, adversarial, irreversible, or high-impact items."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Fast-Path / Slow-Path Architecture", "one_liner": "Handle the common case cheaply and escalate the exceptional case to an expensive path via a trigger.", "page_ref": "prime:fast_path_slow_path_architecture", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Routine majority -> common cases; exceptional minority -> slow-path cases.", "slug": "fast_path_slow_path_architecture", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A frequency-skewed difficulty distribution is the exact architecture's precondition."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The case stream contains many routine items and a smaller exceptional, ambiguous, or high-risk set.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P047-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a low-cost common-case treatment rather than a generic procedure.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A relatively cheap treatment path is used for the common case.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve acceptable-error capability within the common-case scope.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The treatment can handle the common case with an error level deemed acceptable.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve assumptions belonging to the treatment's validity or error conditions.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The treatment depends on operating assumptions that bound its acceptable use.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve explicit articulation of the assumptions.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Those operating assumptions are explicit rather than hidden.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the only-if direction and cannot treat explicitness as merely sufficient or optional.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Explicit assumptions are a necessary condition for the acceptable cheap common-case treatment claim.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Acceptable cheap treatment of the common case requires explicit assumptions.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A cheap common-case treatment has acceptable error only if its operating assumptions are explicit.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P047-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The architecture requires a narrow cheap handler but does not require its assumptions to be explicitly documented.", "slug": "fast_path_slow_path_architecture"}], "residual_id": "r:fast_slow_path_routing:b028_a07_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b028_a07_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A cheap treatment can handle the common case with acceptable error only if its assumptions are explicit. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A cheap treatment can handle the common case with acceptable error only if its assumptions are explicit."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The architecture requires a narrow cheap handler but does not require its assumptions to be explicitly documented.", "slug": "fast_path_slow_path_architecture"}], "normalized_requirement": "A cheap common-case treatment is acceptable only when its assumptions are explicit.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A cheap common-case treatment is acceptable only when its assumptions are explicit.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The slow path is necessarily more expensive and broadly capable than the common-case handler.", "role_mapping": "Richer treatment -> expensive broad slow path.", "slug": "fast_path_slow_path_architecture", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b028_a07_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A slower treatment exists that can use richer evidence, authority, expertise, computation, deliberation, or safeguards. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A slower treatment exists that can use richer evidence, authority, expertise, computation, deliberation, or safeguards."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Fast-Path / Slow-Path Architecture", "one_liner": "Handle the common case cheaply and escalate the exceptional case to an expensive path via a trigger.", "page_ref": "prime:fast_path_slow_path_architecture", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Richer treatment -> expensive broad slow path.", "slug": "fast_path_slow_path_architecture", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The slow path is necessarily more expensive and broadly capable than the common-case handler."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A slower, costlier treatment exists with broader evidence, expertise, computation, authority, deliberation, or safeguards.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A trigger keyed to fast-path unreliability routes exceptional inputs before a confident fast-path error.", "role_mapping": "Features or confidence -> escalation trigger.", "slug": "fast_path_slow_path_architecture", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b028_a07_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The system can observe enough features, confidence, or context to trigger path selection before the cost or harm of misrouting becomes too high. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The system can observe enough features, confidence, or context to trigger path selection before the cost or harm of misrouting becomes too high."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Fast-Path / Slow-Path Architecture", "one_liner": "Handle the common case cheaply and escalate the exceptional case to an expensive path via a trigger.", "page_ref": "prime:fast_path_slow_path_architecture", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Features or confidence -> escalation trigger.", "slug": "fast_path_slow_path_architecture", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A trigger keyed to fast-path unreliability routes exceptional inputs before a confident fast-path error."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "An observable signal can identify fast-path uncertainty early enough to route the case.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The slow path is relatively expensive, but available capacity may still suffice for the whole stream.", "slug": "fast_path_slow_path_architecture"}], "residual_id": "r:fast_slow_path_routing:b028_a07_c5", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b028_a07_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Applying slow-path treatment to every case would overload capacity, destroy latency targets, or waste expertise. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Applying slow-path treatment to every case would overload capacity, destroy latency targets, or waste expertise."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The slow path is relatively expensive, but available capacity may still suffice for the whole stream.", "slug": "fast_path_slow_path_architecture"}], "normalized_requirement": "Applying slow-path treatment to every case would overload capacity, latency, or expertise.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Applying slow-path treatment to every case would overload capacity, latency, or expertise.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P047-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve universal or indiscriminate fast-path routing.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The fast path is allowed to handle every case rather than only its bounded common-case population.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve concealment caused by universal routing, not merely occurrence of harm.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Universal fast-path routing would conceal a relevant problem from detection or review.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For the error branch, a candidate must preserve hidden error.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The concealed problem is an error.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For the inequity branch, a candidate must preserve hidden inequitable treatment or outcome.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The concealed problem is inequity.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For the abuse branch, a candidate must preserve hidden abusive use or conduct.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The concealed problem is abuse.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For the hazard branch, a candidate must preserve a hidden rare hazard.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The concealed problem is a rare hazard.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For the evidence branch, a candidate must preserve hidden corruption of evidence.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The concealed problem is corrupted evidence.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Applying the fast path to every case would conceal at least one exceptional harm mode.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Universal fast-path routing would conceal errors, inequity, abuse, rare hazards, or corrupted evidence.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P047-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Fast-path failure can be benign in a low-stakes domain and need not take any listed harm form.", "slug": "fast_path_slow_path_architecture"}], "residual_id": "r:fast_slow_path_routing:b028_a07_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b028_a07_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Letting every case use the fast path would hide errors, inequity, abuse, rare hazards, or corrupted evidence. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Letting every case use the fast path would hide errors, inequity, abuse, rare hazards, or corrupted evidence."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Fast-path failure can be benign in a low-stakes domain and need not take any listed harm form.", "slug": "fast_path_slow_path_architecture"}], "normalized_requirement": "Applying the fast path to every case would hide errors, inequity, abuse, hazards, or corrupted evidence.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Applying the fast path to every case would hide errors, inequity, abuse, hazards, or corrupted evidence.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The boundary between routine and exceptional can drift as case mix, incentives, threats, or technology changes.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Without explicit routing, the system oscillates between over-processing the routine and under-protecting the exceptional. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The boundary between routine and exceptional can drift as case mix, incentives, threats, or technology changes. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The boundary between routine and exceptional can drift as case mix, incentives, threats, or technology changes.", "Without explicit routing, the system oscillates between over-processing the routine and under-protecting the exceptional."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "The boundary between routine and exceptional can drift as case mix, incentives, threats, or technology changes."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 28, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-028", "ledger_sha256": "0ce0e7678c55bbc31c122201aaf6440b3e36d4f87f6d1698094d11dbc55393a8"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Fast–Slow Store Coupling", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:fast_slow_store_coupling", "slug": "fast_slow_store_coupling"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system must respond quickly to local, recent, or high-frequency demands while also preserving a coherent, integrated, durable memory. Using only a fast store causes overwriting, fragmentation, stale local truth, and loss of history. Using only a slow integrated store makes live action too expensive, late, or cognitively burdensome.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system must respond quickly to local, recent, or high-frequency demands while also preserving a coherent, integrated, durable memory. Using only a fast store causes overwriting, fragmentation, stale local truth, and loss of history. Using only a slow integrated store makes live action too expensive, late, or cognitively burdensome."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The fast store supplies rapid acquisition that the slow integrated store cannot accept or serve at the same cadence.", "role_mapping": "Local recent state -> fast store; canonical integration -> slow store.", "slug": "two_store_architecture", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b028_a08_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Local or recent state is needed faster than the canonical store can safely supply it. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Local or recent state is needed faster than the canonical store can safely supply it."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Two-Store Architecture", "one_liner": "A fast interference-prone store and a slow integrated store coupled by a periodic transfer mechanism, paying for both speed and integration by maintaining two oppositely-optimised substrates.", "page_ref": "prime:two_store_architecture", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Local recent state -> fast store; canonical integration -> slow store.", "slug": "two_store_architecture", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The fast store supplies rapid acquisition that the slow integrated store cannot accept or serve at the same cadence."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Local or recent state is needed faster than an integrated durable store can safely supply it.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "New content is born in a bounded interference-prone fast store before consolidation.", "role_mapping": "Fragile first form -> fast-store content.", "slug": "two_store_architecture", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b028_a08_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Material first appears in a fragile, crowded, or context-specific form that can be overwritten by new input. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Material first appears in a fragile, crowded, or context-specific form that can be overwritten by new input."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Two-Store Architecture", "one_liner": "A fast interference-prone store and a slow integrated store coupled by a periodic transfer mechanism, paying for both speed and integration by maintaining two oppositely-optimised substrates.", "page_ref": "prime:two_store_architecture", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Fragile first form -> fast-store content.", "slug": "two_store_architecture", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "New content is born in a bounded interference-prone fast store before consolidation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "New material first appears in a fragile, crowded, or context-specific form vulnerable to overwrite.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The slow store necessarily integrates selected fast-store content with durable prior structure.", "role_mapping": "Later integration -> slow-store consolidation.", "slug": "two_store_architecture", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b028_a08_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Durable value depends on later integration, deduplication, compression, validation, or provenance preservation. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Durable value depends on later integration, deduplication, compression, validation, or provenance preservation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Two-Store Architecture", "one_liner": "A fast interference-prone store and a slow integrated store coupled by a periodic transfer mechanism, paying for both speed and integration by maintaining two oppositely-optimised substrates.", "page_ref": "prime:two_store_architecture", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Later integration -> slow-store consolidation.", "slug": "two_store_architecture", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The slow store necessarily integrates selected fast-store content with durable prior structure."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Durable value requires later integration, deduplication, compression, validation, or provenance preservation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A dedicated transfer window and selection-for-transfer rule are mandatory.", "role_mapping": "Scheduled transfer -> consolidation window; governance -> selection rule.", "slug": "two_store_architecture", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b028_a08_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Transfer from the fast layer to the slow layer can be scheduled, triggered, or governed explicitly. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Transfer from the fast layer to the slow layer can be scheduled, triggered, or governed explicitly."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Two-Store Architecture", "one_liner": "A fast interference-prone store and a slow integrated store coupled by a periodic transfer mechanism, paying for both speed and integration by maintaining two oppositely-optimised substrates.", "page_ref": "prime:two_store_architecture", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Scheduled transfer -> consolidation window; governance -> selection rule.", "slug": "two_store_architecture", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A dedicated transfer window and selection-for-transfer rule are mandatory."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Transfer from the fast layer to the slow layer can be scheduled, triggered, and governed.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The system faces repeated reads or decisions where locality of reference makes a fast layer valuable.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The system faces repeated reads or decisions where locality of reference makes a fast layer valuable. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The system faces repeated reads or decisions where locality of reference makes a fast layer valuable."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The system faces repeated reads or decisions where locality of reference makes a fast layer valuable."}, {"display_text": "The cost of maintaining two stores is lower than the cost of slow responses, lost traces, or incoherent memory.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Using only a slow integrated store makes live action too expensive, late, or cognitively burdensome. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: The cost of maintaining two stores is lower than the cost of slow responses, lost traces, or incoherent memory. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The cost of maintaining two stores is lower than the cost of slow responses, lost traces, or incoherent memory.", "Using only a slow integrated store makes live action too expensive, late, or cognitively burdensome."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The cost of maintaining two stores is lower than the cost of slow responses, lost traces, or incoherent memory."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 28, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-028", "ledger_sha256": "0ce0e7678c55bbc31c122201aaf6440b3e36d4f87f6d1698094d11dbc55393a8"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Fault-Tolerant Distributed Consensus", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:fault_tolerant_distributed_consensus", "slug": "fault_tolerant_distributed_consensus"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Distributed participants act from local state. A message that has not arrived gives no definitive\ninformation about whether its sender is slow, isolated, overloaded, crashed, recovering, or\nmalicious. Two partitions can each observe internally coherent evidence and still disagree about\nwhich coordinator is current. A recovering node can forget a promise unless it was made durable.\nA leader can expose an external effect before the system has enough evidence to prevent a rival\nleader from exposing the opposite effect.\n\nThe hardest problem is not collecting many affirmative responses. It is ensuring that every set\nof responses capable of deciding intersects every conflicting deciding set in enough trustworthy\nparticipants that conflicting certificates cannot both form. Under crash faults this often means\nmajority intersection; under Byzantine faults it requires larger quorums and authentication so the\nintersection contains sufficient correct witnesses despite equivocation. Weighted membership,\njoint reconfiguration, flexible quorums, and failure domains change the arithmetic but not the\nobligation to prove it.\n\nSafety and liveness must be separated. Safety says that nothing contradictory happens: correct\nparticipants do not decide different values and invalid values cannot be certified. Liveness says\nthat something eventually happens. A system can preserve safety indefinitely by refusing all\nprogress. Conversely, it can appear highly available by letting disjoint partitions decide, but\nthen it no longer provides consensus. A mature design documents exactly where it sits in that\ntradeoff and what conditions authorize progress.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Multiple independently failing participants must expose one authoritative value or ordered history, yet messages can be delayed, duplicated, reordered, lost, or forged; processes can crash, recover, or equivocate; and no participant has complete knowledge of the others' state. Local acceptance can therefore create split decisions, stale leaders, divergent logs, double execution, or indefinite waiting unless the protocol binds safety evidence, persistence, membership, and progress assumptions together."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Plural participants with divergent proposals are mandatory inputs to the single decided state.", "role_mapping": "Replicas or agents -> participants; logical decision -> shared decided value.", "slug": "consensus", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b028_a09_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Two or more replicas or agents can propose or acknowledge the same logical decision. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Two or more replicas or agents can propose or acknowledge the same logical decision."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Consensus", "one_liner": "Producing a single shared decided state from many participants with disagreeing or adversarial views, under a fault model, satisfying agreement, validity, and termination together.", "page_ref": "prime:consensus", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Replicas or agents -> participants; logical decision -> shared decided value.", "slug": "consensus", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Plural participants with divergent proposals are mandatory inputs to the single decided state."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Two or more participants can propose or acknowledge values for one logical decision.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Agreement requires that no two non-faulty participants decide different states.", "role_mapping": "Conflicting decisions -> agreement violation.", "slug": "consensus", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b028_a09_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A conflicting decision would violate correctness, ownership, ordering, or external safety. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A conflicting decision would violate correctness, ownership, ordering, or external safety."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Consensus", "one_liner": "Producing a single shared decided state from many participants with disagreeing or adversarial views, under a fault model, satisfying agreement, validity, and termination together.", "page_ref": "prime:consensus", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Conflicting decisions -> agreement violation.", "slug": "consensus", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Agreement requires that no two non-faulty participants decide different states."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Two correct participants deciding differently would violate correctness or external safety.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Consensus fault models may include correlated, Byzantine, timing, or omission faults; independence is not mandatory.", "slug": "consensus"}], "residual_id": "r:fault_tolerant_distributed_consensus:b028_a09_c3", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b028_a09_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Multiple independently failing participants must expose one authoritative value or ordered history, yet messages can be delayed, duplicated, reordered, lost, or forged; processes can crash, recover, or equivocate; and no participant has complete knowledge of the others' state. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Participants or communication paths can fail independently during the decision.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Participants or communication paths can fail independently during the decision.", "Multiple independently failing participants must expose one authoritative value or ordered history, yet messages can be delayed, duplicated, reordered, lost, or forged; processes can crash, recover, or equivocate; and no participant has complete knowledge of the others' state."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Consensus fault models may include correlated, Byzantine, timing, or omission faults; independence is not mandatory.", "slug": "consensus"}], "normalized_requirement": "Participants or communication paths can fail independently during the decision.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Participants or communication paths can fail independently during the decision.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P048-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The exact record must type the persistent item as a system decision or authoritative decision state.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A system has a decision whose authoritative content is the item that must endure.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The exact record must entail persistence of the decision across discontinuity, not merely agreement before it.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The decision remains durable and valid across operational discontinuities.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The exact record must make persistence required for the relevant system, not optional or accidental.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The system requires this durability rather than merely permitting it.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The exact record must carry the decision across operational epochs broadly; surviving only one named example is insufficient.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Persistence spans later retry, leadership-change, recovery, and comparable discontinuity events.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "The system needs a durable decision that survives operational discontinuities such as retry, leadership change, or recovery.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A system decision must persist across operational discontinuities.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P048-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The abstract consensus problem guarantees agreement, validity, and termination but does not itself require durable storage across recovery or leadership epochs.", "slug": "consensus"}], "residual_id": "r:fault_tolerant_distributed_consensus:b028_a09_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b028_a09_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The system needs a durable decision that survives retry, leadership change, or recovery. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The system needs a durable decision that survives retry, leadership change, or recovery."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The abstract consensus problem guarantees agreement, validity, and termination but does not itself require durable storage across recovery or leadership epochs.", "slug": "consensus"}], "normalized_requirement": "The decision must persist across retry, leadership change, or recovery.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The decision must persist across retry, leadership change, or recovery.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P048-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The exact record must preserve availability and consistency as the two principal guarantees in tension.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Availability and consistency are distinct system guarantees whose simultaneous satisfaction is at issue.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The exact record must entail a tradeoff relation between the two guarantees, not merely mention both.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The system trades availability against consistency.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The exact record must preserve the opposed comparison direction rather than treating the guarantees as independent benefits.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Gaining or preserving one guarantee is evaluated against loss or weakening of the other.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The exact record must require an explicit choice or tradeoff, not merely allow an implicit degradation.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The tradeoff must be made explicitly.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The exact record must situate the tradeoff in the interval of a partition or an equivalent separation failure.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The tradeoff is required during a partition.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "Availability must be traded explicitly against consistency during partitions.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A partition requires an explicit tradeoff between availability and consistency.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P048-C04-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Eventual consistency chooses availability and merge after divergence; not every consensus instance permits local writes or faces a network partition.", "slug": "eventual_consistency"}], "residual_id": "r:fault_tolerant_distributed_consensus:b028_a09_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b028_a09_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Availability must be traded explicitly against consistency during partitions. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Availability must be traded explicitly against consistency during partitions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "I attempted a complete CAP instance that preserves both availability and linearizability during a partition, but the exact theorem rules that instance out.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "CAP Theorem", "one_liner": "A distributed data store cannot guarantee consistency and availability at once during a network partition, and since real networks always partition, the architect must choose which to sacrifice when one strikes.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:cap_theorem", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "cap_theorem"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "cap_theorem", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P048-C04-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every complete CAP instance entails the same mandatory, explicit consistency-versus-availability choice during partition."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_GUARDED_EQUIVALENT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "An inherited quorum configuration can be strongly consistent and unavailable under partition without anyone explicitly making the focal tradeoff; the qualifier excludes that case.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Strong Consistency", "one_liner": "Guarantee that every read of a replicated store reflects the most recently completed write and all clients see one real-time-consistent total order (linearizability), so the system can be reasoned about as a single copy — bought with a coordination round and partition-time unavailability.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:strong_consistency", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O4"], "guard_type": "MODALITY_ACTUALIZATION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "explicit_partition_consistency_selection", "predicate": "The architecture decision explicitly selects the strong-consistency posture for partition operation.", "rationale": "Independent publication-safety review confirms the retained expression satisfies a complete DNF branch under its stated classification. The DSA supplies the complete partition tradeoff and its direction; one atomic guard supplies the source's explicit-choice modality."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "strong_consistency"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The architecture decision explicitly selects the strong-consistency posture for partition operation."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "strong_consistency", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P048-C04-U1", "why_it_fits": "The DSA supplies the complete partition tradeoff and its direction; one atomic guard supplies the source's explicit-choice modality."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "An ordinary split brain can arise from automatic, unexamined failover, so the exact record alone does not satisfy the source's explicitness requirement.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Split-Brain Problem", "one_liner": "The distributed-systems failure where a network partition splits a replicated cluster into subsets that each elect themselves as write authority and accept divergent writes; guard against it by enforcing that at most one subset — the quorum majority — may write.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:split_brain_problem", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O4"], "guard_type": "OTHER", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "split_brain_tradeoff_explicitly_chosen", "predicate": "The partition-time availability-versus-consistency posture is explicitly chosen rather than left implicit in failover behavior.", "rationale": "Independent publication-safety review confirms the retained expression satisfies a complete DNF branch under its stated classification. The failure record contains the full C/A partition binary. Restricting it to cases where that posture is explicitly chosen supplies the sole remaining qualifier."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "split_brain_problem"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "split_brain_tradeoff_explicitly_chosen"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "split_brain_problem", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P048-C04-U1", "why_it_fits": "The failure record contains the full C/A partition binary. Restricting it to cases where that posture is explicitly chosen supplies the sole remaining qualifier."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "I tested whether PACELC could omit a declared partition posture, but its four-letter classification necessarily records PA or PC for that regime.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "PACELC Theorem", "one_liner": "Classify a replicated data system by two regime-dependent trade-offs — availability vs. consistency under Partition, and Else (normal operation) latency vs. consistency — into a four-letter posture from which its workload behaviour reads directly.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:pacelc_theorem", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "pacelc_theorem"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "pacelc_theorem", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P048-C04-U1", "why_it_fits": "PACELC necessarily includes the complete explicit availability-consistency partition branch, even though it also adds an Else-regime tradeoff."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Tunable consistency changes decision granularity but, by the exact record's own exclusion, never removes the forced C/A partition axis.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "CAP Theorem (and variants)", "one_liner": "Characterize any replicated data store by its coordinates on a small set of axes — the forced C-versus-A choice under partition, PACELC's latency-versus-consistency choice at rest, plus granularity dials and the CRDT merge-algebra escape.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:cap_theorem_variant", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "cap_theorem_variant"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "cap_theorem_variant", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P048-C04-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every complete variants instance retains CAP's explicit forced C/A choice during partition before any additional dimensions are considered."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Availability must be traded explicitly against consistency during partitions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P048-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The exact record must preserve both the participant-membership role and the earlier consensus-evidence role.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The roles are a changing membership and consensus evidence produced earlier.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The exact record must entail continued evidentiary validity across membership change, not merely reconfiguration.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Membership changes while the earlier evidence retains validity.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The exact record must preserve possibility of the overlap and may not require that it always occurs.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The coexistence of changed membership and valid earlier evidence is possible.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The exact record must preserve the earlier-to-later temporal ordering and persistence across the change.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The evidence predates the membership change and remains valid after or through it.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "Membership can change while earlier consensus evidence, such as votes or log entries, remains valid.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Prior consensus evidence can remain valid across a membership change.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P048-C05-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Consensus can operate over a fixed participant set with no reconfiguration.", "slug": "consensus"}], "residual_id": "r:fault_tolerant_distributed_consensus:b028_a09_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b028_a09_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Local acceptance can therefore create split decisions, stale leaders, divergent logs, double execution, or indefinite waiting unless the protocol binds safety evidence, persistence, membership, and progress assumptions together. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Membership can change while earlier votes or log entries remain valid evidence.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Membership can change while earlier votes or log entries remain valid evidence.", "Local acceptance can therefore create split decisions, stale leaders, divergent logs, double execution, or indefinite waiting unless the protocol binds safety evidence, persistence, membership, and progress assumptions together."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Consensus can operate over a fixed participant set with no reconfiguration.", "slug": "consensus"}], "normalized_requirement": "Membership can change while earlier votes or log entries remain valid evidence.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Membership can change while earlier votes or log entries remain valid evidence.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 28, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-028", "ledger_sha256": "0ce0e7678c55bbc31c122201aaf6440b3e36d4f87f6d1698094d11dbc55393a8"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Fault-Tolerant Operation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:fault_tolerant_operation", "slug": "fault_tolerant_operation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is local failure causing global collapse. A component, actor, input, sensor, link, process step, or service can fail during live operation, and the larger system lacks a designed way to keep the critical function separate from that failure.\n\nThis problem often appears as brittle coupling. One bad node disables a service; one missing approval blocks urgent work; one corrupted data source contaminates decisions; one failed route halts all delivery; one unavailable system forces staff to improvise. The system may look reliable in nominal conditions, but it has no explicit runtime posture for partial failure.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system must continue a critical function even when some component, input, actor, dependency, pathway, or subsystem fails during operation."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Every fault-tolerant design specifies faults under which service continues.", "role_mapping": "Partial failure -> fault-model event.", "slug": "fault_tolerance", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b028_a10_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Partial failure is plausible during live operation. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Partial failure is plausible during live operation"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Fault Tolerance", "one_liner": "Continue operating under failure.", "page_ref": "prime:fault_tolerance", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Partial failure -> fault-model event.", "slug": "fault_tolerance", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Every fault-tolerant design specifies faults under which service continues."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Partial component, input, actor, dependency, or subsystem failure is plausible during live operation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact structure separates a specified fault model from the acceptable service level maintained under it.", "role_mapping": "Failed part -> fault; protected function -> service envelope.", "slug": "fault_tolerance", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b028_a10_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The failed part can be distinguished from the protected function. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The failed part can be distinguished from the protected function"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Fault Tolerance", "one_liner": "Continue operating under failure.", "page_ref": "prime:fault_tolerance", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Failed part -> fault; protected function -> service envelope.", "slug": "fault_tolerance", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact structure separates a specified fault model from the acceptable service level maintained under it."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The failed part is distinguishable from the service or function that must be preserved.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "An acceptable degraded or full service level and a quantified N,f tolerance bound are mandatory.", "role_mapping": "Continuation mode -> service level; bound -> tolerated failures.", "slug": "fault_tolerance", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b028_a10_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A continuation mode can be bounded. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A continuation mode can be bounded"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Fault Tolerance", "one_liner": "Continue operating under failure.", "page_ref": "prime:fault_tolerance", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Continuation mode -> service level; bound -> tolerated failures.", "slug": "fault_tolerance", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "An acceptable degraded or full service level and a quantified N,f tolerance bound are mandatory."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The continuation mode and tolerated fault bound can be stated explicitly.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P048-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The exact record must preserve fault effects as the propagating content, not an unrelated spread process.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Fault effects are the content whose cascading propagation is at issue.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The exact record must concern propagation that compounds or cascades, without requiring a particular initial locus or recipient boundary.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The prohibited relation is cascading propagation of those fault effects.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The exact record must entail prevention of the cascade with the source negative polarity.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Cascading propagation is prevented rather than permitted or merely observed.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The exact record must make cascade prevention a requirement rather than an optional improvement.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Prevention of cascading fault effects is mandatory.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "Cascading propagation of fault effects must be prevented.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Cascading propagation of fault effects must be prevented.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P048-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Faults may propagate across several components while the system still remains within its specified tolerance and service bound.", "slug": "fault_tolerance"}], "residual_id": "r:fault_tolerant_operation:b028_a10_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b028_a10_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Fault effects must be prevented from cascading. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Fault effects must be prevented from cascading"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Faults may propagate across several components while the system still remains within its specified tolerance and service bound.", "slug": "fault_tolerance"}], "normalized_requirement": "Fault effects must be prevented from cascading beyond the failed part.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Fault effects must be prevented from cascading beyond the failed part.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P048-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The exact record must preserve a restorative-operation role and the continuity of the affected operation or service.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The roles are an operating system or service, its continuity, and a restorative operation.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The exact record must prohibit continuity loss during the restorative operation, not merely promise eventual return.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The restorative operation occurs without loss of continuity.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The exact record must make the operation and continuity constraint mandatory.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A continuity-preserving restorative operation is required.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For the recovery branch, the exact record must entail recovery without continuity loss.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The continuity-preserving restorative operation is recovery.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For the repair branch, the exact record must entail repair without continuity loss.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The continuity-preserving restorative operation is repair.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Recovery or repair must occur without loss of operational continuity.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A required restorative operation preserves operational continuity.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P048-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Safe-fail shutdown is an allowed fault-tolerance mode, so uninterrupted recovery is not universal.", "slug": "fault_tolerance"}], "residual_id": "r:fault_tolerant_operation:b028_a10_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b028_a10_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Recovery or repair must occur without losing continuity. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Recovery or repair must occur without losing continuity"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Safe-fail shutdown is an allowed fault-tolerance mode, so uninterrupted recovery is not universal.", "slug": "fault_tolerance"}], "normalized_requirement": "Recovery or repair must occur without losing continuity.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Recovery or repair must occur without losing continuity.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Stopping the whole system is more costly than tolerating the local fault.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when interruption is costly, but full fail-safe shutdown would be too conservative for every local fault. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: Stopping the whole system is more costly than tolerating the local fault. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Stopping the whole system is more costly than tolerating the local fault", "It is especially useful when interruption is costly, but full fail-safe shutdown would be too conservative for every local fault."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "Stopping the whole system is more costly than tolerating the local fault"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 28, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-028", "ledger_sha256": "0ce0e7678c55bbc31c122201aaf6440b3e36d4f87f6d1698094d11dbc55393a8"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Feasible-Alternative Comparator Calibration", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:feasible_alternative_comparator_calibration", "slug": "feasible_alternative_comparator_calibration"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Decision makers, critics, or reviewers reject a real policy, design, institution, explanation, or intervention by comparing it to an idealized counterfactual with perfect information, zero transaction cost, no implementation friction, unlimited resources, complete compliance, or no adverse side effects. Because the comparator is outside the actual feasible option set, the evaluation confuses imperfection with inferiority and blocks improvement that may dominate all available alternatives.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Decision makers, critics, or reviewers reject a real policy, design, institution, explanation, or intervention by comparing it to an idealized counterfactual with perfect information, zero transaction cost, no implementation friction, unlimited resources, complete compliance, or no adverse side effects. Because the comparator is outside the actual feasible option set, the evaluation confuses imperfection with inferiority and blocks improvement that may dominate all available alternatives."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "An available option inside the feasible choice set is mandatory.", "role_mapping": "Real option -> in-set available option.", "slug": "nirvana_fallacy", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b028_a11_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A real option is being evaluated for adoption, retention, reform, replacement, or rejection. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A real option is being evaluated for adoption, retention, reform, replacement, or rejection."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Nirvana Fallacy", "one_liner": "Rejecting a real, available option because it falls short of an idealized counterfactual, when the operative comparison should be against the best feasible alternative.", "page_ref": "prime:nirvana_fallacy", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Real option -> in-set available option.", "slug": "nirvana_fallacy", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "An available option inside the feasible choice set is mandatory."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A real available option is being evaluated for adoption, retention, reform, replacement, or rejection.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The defining error imports an idealized benchmark from outside the feasible set.", "role_mapping": "Imagined alternative -> out-of-set ideal benchmark.", "slug": "nirvana_fallacy", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b028_a11_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The objection relies on a better imagined alternative without demonstrating availability, feasibility, cost, timing, authority, compliance, or implementation path. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The objection relies on a better imagined alternative without demonstrating availability, feasibility, cost, timing, authority, compliance, or implementation path."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Nirvana Fallacy", "one_liner": "Rejecting a real, available option because it falls short of an idealized counterfactual, when the operative comparison should be against the best feasible alternative.", "page_ref": "prime:nirvana_fallacy", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Imagined alternative -> out-of-set ideal benchmark.", "slug": "nirvana_fallacy", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The defining error imports an idealized benchmark from outside the feasible set."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The objection invokes a better imagined alternative without establishing its feasibility, cost, timing, authority, compliance, or path.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P048-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The exact record must preserve the evaluator, focal option, defect, and actual-alternative comparison roles.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A critic evaluates an option, its defects, and actual alternative options.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The exact record must preserve the universal treatment of defects, not merely identify one material flaw.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Every defect is treated as evaluation-dispositive.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The exact record must entail defect-as-decisive evaluation rather than ordinary defect recognition.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A defect is treated as sufficient to decide against the focal option.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The exact record must preserve both the net-performance criterion and the baseline of actual alternatives.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Net performance is not compared against actual alternatives.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "A critic treats every defect as decisive rather than comparing the option's net performance against actual alternatives.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An option is judged defect-by-defect instead of by net performance relative to actual alternatives.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P048-C08-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A nirvana comparison can fault one property absent from all alternatives; it need not treat every defect as decisive or compute net performance.", "slug": "nirvana_fallacy"}], "residual_id": "r:feasible_alternative_comparator_calibration:b028_a11_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b028_a11_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Normative ideals help identify defects, but decisions require comparisons among feasible alternatives under shared constraints. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The critic treats every defect as decisive rather than comparing net performance against actual alternatives.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The critic treats every defect as decisive rather than comparing net performance against actual alternatives.", "Normative ideals help identify defects, but decisions require comparisons among feasible alternatives under shared constraints."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A nirvana comparison can fault one property absent from all alternatives; it need not treat every defect as decisive or compute net performance.", "slug": "nirvana_fallacy"}], "normalized_requirement": "The critic treats every defect as decisive rather than comparing net performance against actual alternatives.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The critic treats every defect as decisive rather than comparing net performance against actual alternatives.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P048-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The exact record must preserve an evaluator, comparison objects, and functional role assignments.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Opponents or evaluators assign functional roles to comparisons.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The exact record must preserve aspiration as a named comparison role, not a generic favorable standard.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Aspiration is one required comparison function in the role set.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The exact record must preserve diagnostic benchmark as a named comparison role.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Diagnostic benchmark is one required comparison function in the role set.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The exact record must preserve decision comparator as a named comparison role.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Decision comparator is one required comparison function in the role set.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The exact record must entail role shifting across aspiration, diagnosis, and choice rather than one stable comparison role.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The evaluator shifts comparisons among the three named functions.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The exact record must preserve absence of explicit role labels for the comparisons being shifted.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The role of each comparison involved in the shift is not labeled.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Opponents shift comparisons among aspiration, diagnostic-benchmark, and decision-comparator roles without labeling the role of each comparison.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An evaluator shifts comparisons among three named functions without labeling each function.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P048-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The fallacy can use one stable but infeasible comparator without role shifting.", "slug": "nirvana_fallacy"}], "residual_id": "r:feasible_alternative_comparator_calibration:b028_a11_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b028_a11_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Opponents shift between aspiration, diagnostic benchmark, and decision comparator without labeling the role of each comparison. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Opponents shift between aspiration, diagnostic benchmark, and decision comparator without labeling the role of each comparison."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The fallacy can use one stable but infeasible comparator without role shifting.", "slug": "nirvana_fallacy"}], "normalized_requirement": "Opponents shift among aspiration, diagnostic benchmark, and decision comparator without labeling each role.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Opponents shift among aspiration, diagnostic benchmark, and decision comparator without labeling each role.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P048-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The exact record must preserve the proposal and the decision set of partial feasible improvements.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The focal option is a proposal considered in a choice among partial feasible improvements.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The exact record must entail the whole-problem objection as a negative assessment of the proposal.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The proposal is negatively assessed because it does not solve the whole problem.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The exact record must preserve the mismatch between the complete-solution benchmark and the partial feasible option set.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A complete-solution criterion is applied despite a decision baseline of partial feasible alternatives.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The exact record must connect the assessment to failure to solve the whole problem, not to an unrelated defect.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The proposal's incompleteness is the stated basis for the negative assessment.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The exact record must confine the comparison to a decision task over partial feasible improvements.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The relevant task is choice among feasible partial improvements, not selection of a total solution.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "A proposal is faulted for not solving the whole problem even though the decision task is to choose among partial feasible improvements.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A partial feasible proposal is assessed against a whole-problem solution criterion that exceeds the decision task.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P048-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The unavailable ideal can concern cost, certainty, reversibility, or another property rather than complete problem solution.", "slug": "nirvana_fallacy"}], "residual_id": "r:feasible_alternative_comparator_calibration:b028_a11_c7", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b028_a11_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A proposal is said to “not solve the whole problem” even though the task is to choose among partial feasible improvements. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A proposal is said to “not solve the whole problem” even though the task is to choose among partial feasible improvements."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The unavailable ideal can concern cost, certainty, reversibility, or another property rather than complete problem solution.", "slug": "nirvana_fallacy"}], "normalized_requirement": "A partial feasible improvement is rejected because it does not solve the whole problem.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A partial feasible improvement is rejected because it does not solve the whole problem.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The domain contains imperfect but action-relevant choices, such as policy, engineering, medicine, law, public administration, or institutional design.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Decision makers, critics, or reviewers reject a real policy, design, institution, explanation, or intervention by comparing it to an idealized counterfactual with perfect information, zero transaction cost, no implementation friction, unlimited resources, complete compliance, or no adverse side effects. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The domain contains imperfect but action-relevant choices, such as policy, engineering, medicine, law, public administration, or institutional design. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The domain contains imperfect but action-relevant choices, such as policy, engineering, medicine, law, public administration, or institutional design.", "Decision makers, critics, or reviewers reject a real policy, design, institution, explanation, or intervention by comparing it to an idealized counterfactual with perfect information, zero transaction cost, no implementation friction, unlimited resources, complete compliance, or no adverse side effects."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The domain contains imperfect but action-relevant choices, such as policy, engineering, medicine, law, public administration, or institutional design."}, {"display_text": "The evaluation is high-stakes enough that an ideal benchmark may sound morally or analytically compelling even when it cannot be implemented.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The evaluation is high-stakes enough that an ideal benchmark may sound morally or analytically compelling even when it cannot be implemented. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The evaluation is high-stakes enough that an ideal benchmark may sound morally or analytically compelling even when it cannot be implemented."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The evaluation is high-stakes enough that an ideal benchmark may sound morally or analytically compelling even when it cannot be implemented."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 28, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-028", "ledger_sha256": "0ce0e7678c55bbc31c122201aaf6440b3e36d4f87f6d1698094d11dbc55393a8"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Feedback Loop Redirection", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:feedback_loop_redirection", "slug": "feedback_loop_redirection"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 1 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 1}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system's own feedback dynamics reinforce, normalize, or repeatedly recreate an undesirable state or trajectory.", "explanation_source": {"field": "diagnostic_head", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system's own feedback dynamics reinforce, normalize, or repeatedly recreate an undesirable state or trajectory."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "This branch preserves the complete remedy-free diagnostic route; goals, feasibility clauses, gates, deployment constraints, and supporting context remain outside the DNF."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "EXT001-C046", "dnf": [["EXT001-U046-O1"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"obligation_id": "EXT001-U046-O1", "predicate": "A feedback loop causes system outputs or consequences to reinforce an undesirable state or trajectory."}], "predicate": "A feedback loop causes system outputs or consequences to reinforce an undesirable state or trajectory.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A feedback loop causes system outputs or consequences to reinforce an undesirable state or trajectory.", "unit_id": "EXT001-U046"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"catalog_exhaustion": "CONDITION_LEVEL", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: A feedback loop causes system outputs or consequences to reinforce an undesirable state or trajectory.", "slug": "feedback"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: A feedback loop causes system outputs or consequences to reinforce an undesirable state or trajectory.", "slug": "system_archetypes"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: A feedback loop causes system outputs or consequences to reinforce an undesirable state or trajectory.", "slug": "homeostasis"}], "residual_id": "EXT001:feedback_loop_redirection:C01", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding."}}, "condition_id": "ext001_feedback_loop_redirection_a01", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored essence_one_line, compression_statement, components fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: A feedback loop causes system outputs or consequences to reinforce an undesirable state or trajectory.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A feedback loop causes system outputs or consequences to reinforce an undesirable state or trajectory."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: A feedback loop causes system outputs or consequences to reinforce an undesirable state or trajectory.", "slug": "feedback"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: A feedback loop causes system outputs or consequences to reinforce an undesirable state or trajectory.", "slug": "system_archetypes"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: A feedback loop causes system outputs or consequences to reinforce an undesirable state or trajectory.", "slug": "homeostasis"}], "normalized_requirement": "A feedback loop causes system outputs or consequences to reinforce an undesirable state or trajectory.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A feedback loop causes system outputs or consequences to reinforce an undesirable state or trajectory.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The loop's signal path, gain, delay, or interpretation can be observed and altered.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored essence_one_line, compression_statement, components fields; the source file was not modified. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: The loop's signal path, gain, delay, or interpretation can be observed and altered. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The loop's signal path, gain, delay, or interpretation can be observed and altered.", "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored essence_one_line, compression_statement, components fields; the source file was not modified."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "The loop's signal path, gain, delay, or interpretation can be observed and altered."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"candidate_ledger_sha256": "96f72d2139077fd57bf795048ebef33b3fd574b20963170080ec916b5b3b92fe", "extension_id": "new-archetypes-extension-001", "ledger_id": "prime-production-v1.2-extension-001", "ledger_sha256": "9644520614744632d1d36da44b1acd77ce432852c6083eb871203521c166efce"}, "base_projection_sha256": "841e0c7f3cb8e8054475ad29a8a14745a416b4fc115559a44878b94292e673ec", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "ca09ed9fe1598ce7072755b530de5553f5ee0a7cd64ae82d9e4a4e2149a37788", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Field-Selective Retention Then Recovery", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:field_selective_retention_then_recovery", "slug": "field_selective_retention_then_recovery"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 2 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 2}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The same state is being asked to perform two incompatible operations: retain a target\nstrongly enough for washing and transport that target into a clean collector. A\ncontinuous separator either loses selected material with the wash or carries too much\nnontarget material into the product stream.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A continuous separation process cannot simultaneously reject nontarget material and recover a selected mobile fraction at useful purity or concentration."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "This branch preserves the complete remedy-free diagnostic route; goals, feasibility clauses, gates, deployment constraints, and supporting context remain outside the DNF."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "EXT001-C047", "dnf": [["EXT001-U047-O1"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"obligation_id": "EXT001-U047-O1", "predicate": "A mixed mobile population contains a target fraction and nontarget material."}], "predicate": "A mixed mobile population contains a target fraction and nontarget material.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A mixed mobile population contains a target fraction and nontarget material.", "unit_id": "EXT001-U047"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"catalog_exhaustion": "CONDITION_LEVEL", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: A mixed mobile population contains a target fraction and nontarget material.", "slug": "extreme_capture_probability"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: A mixed mobile population contains a target fraction and nontarget material.", "slug": "selective_propagation"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: A mixed mobile population contains a target fraction and nontarget material.", "slug": "population_coding"}], "residual_id": "EXT001:field_selective_retention_then_recovery:C01", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding."}}, "condition_id": "ext001_field_selective_retention_then_recovery_a01", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: A mixed mobile population contains a target fraction and nontarget material.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A mixed mobile population contains a target fraction and nontarget material."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: A mixed mobile population contains a target fraction and nontarget material.", "slug": "extreme_capture_probability"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: A mixed mobile population contains a target fraction and nontarget material.", "slug": "selective_propagation"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: A mixed mobile population contains a target fraction and nontarget material.", "slug": "population_coding"}], "normalized_requirement": "A mixed mobile population contains a target fraction and nontarget material.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A mixed mobile population contains a target fraction and nontarget material.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "EXT001-C048", "dnf": [["EXT001-U048-O1"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"obligation_id": "EXT001-U048-O1", "predicate": "Continuous passage either loses selected material during washing or carries excessive nontarget material into the product stream."}], "predicate": "Continuous passage either loses selected material during washing or carries excessive nontarget material into the product stream.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Continuous passage either loses selected material during washing or carries excessive nontarget material into the product stream.", "unit_id": "EXT001-U048"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"catalog_exhaustion": "CONDITION_LEVEL", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Continuous passage either loses selected material during washing or carries excessive nontarget material into the product stream.", "slug": "blockage_release_dynamics"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Continuous passage either loses selected material during washing or carries excessive nontarget material into the product stream.", "slug": "gradual_deterioration"}, {"falls_short_because": "The exact record describes an intervention, control, or achieved configuration rather than a pre-existing situation that necessarily entails the atom.", "slug": "buffering"}], "residual_id": "EXT001:field_selective_retention_then_recovery:C02", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding."}}, "condition_id": "ext001_field_selective_retention_then_recovery_a02", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: Continuous passage either loses selected material during washing or carries excessive nontarget material into the product stream.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Continuous passage either loses selected material during washing or carries excessive nontarget material into the product stream."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Continuous passage either loses selected material during washing or carries excessive nontarget material into the product stream.", "slug": "blockage_release_dynamics"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Continuous passage either loses selected material during washing or carries excessive nontarget material into the product stream.", "slug": "gradual_deterioration"}, {"falls_short_because": "The exact record describes an intervention, control, or achieved configuration rather than a pre-existing situation that necessarily entails the atom.", "slug": "buffering"}], "normalized_requirement": "Continuous passage either loses selected material during washing or carries excessive nontarget material into the product stream.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Continuous passage either loses selected material during washing or carries excessive nontarget material into the product stream.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The target has a distinguishable field response that can be reversibly engaged.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: The target has a distinguishable field response that can be reversibly engaged. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The target has a distinguishable field response that can be reversibly engaged.", "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "The target has a distinguishable field response that can be reversibly engaged."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"candidate_ledger_sha256": "96f72d2139077fd57bf795048ebef33b3fd574b20963170080ec916b5b3b92fe", "extension_id": "new-archetypes-extension-001", "ledger_id": "prime-production-v1.2-extension-001", "ledger_sha256": "9644520614744632d1d36da44b1acd77ce432852c6083eb871203521c166efce"}, "base_projection_sha256": "841e0c7f3cb8e8054475ad29a8a14745a416b4fc115559a44878b94292e673ec", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "ca09ed9fe1598ce7072755b530de5553f5ee0a7cd64ae82d9e4a4e2149a37788", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Figure-Ground Structuring", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:figure_ground_structuring", "slug": "figure_ground_structuring"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 2, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 2, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 2, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 2 of 2 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A perceptual, informational, narrative, musical, statistical, or social field contains more possible figures than the audience can process, while the surrounding ground is either too noisy, too invisible, too dominant, or too ethically consequential to leave unmanaged. Without explicit figure-ground structuring, people attend to the wrong element, miss the focal signal, strip the focal signal of context, or treat a background assumption as if it were neutral reality.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A perceptual, informational, narrative, musical, statistical, or social field contains more possible figures than the audience can process, while the surrounding ground is either too noisy, too invisible, too dominant, or too ethically consequential to leave unmanaged. Without explicit figure-ground structuring, people attend to the wrong element, miss the focal signal, strip the focal signal of context, or treat a background assumption as if it were neutral reality."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The same field admits reciprocal and reversible figure-ground assignments.", "role_mapping": "Field elements -> candidate figures and ground.", "slug": "figure_ground", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b028_a12_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A field contains multiple simultaneous signals, objects, actors, claims, causes, notes, metrics, or visual elements that can each plausibly become the figure. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A field contains multiple simultaneous signals, objects, actors, claims, causes, notes, metrics, or visual elements that can each plausibly become the figure."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Figure-Ground", "one_liner": "Perceptual organization of a field into salient figure and receding ground.", "page_ref": "prime:figure_ground", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Field elements -> candidate figures and ground.", "slug": "figure_ground", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The same field admits reciprocal and reversible figure-ground assignments."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "One field contains multiple elements that can plausibly become the salient figure.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A bounded salient figure is necessarily perceived against a recessive surrounding ground.", "role_mapping": "Focal item -> figure; baseline or context -> ground.", "slug": "figure_ground", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b028_a12_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A focal item must be interpreted against a baseline, surround, context, accompaniment, control condition, history, frame, or background texture. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A focal item must be interpreted against a baseline, surround, context, accompaniment, control condition, history, frame, or background texture."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Figure-Ground", "one_liner": "Perceptual organization of a field into salient figure and receding ground.", "page_ref": "prime:figure_ground", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Focal item -> figure; baseline or context -> ground.", "slug": "figure_ground", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A bounded salient figure is necessarily perceived against a recessive surrounding ground."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A focal item is interpreted against a baseline, surround, context, accompaniment, frame, or background.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P048-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O9"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The exact record must preserve the intended-figure role and a distinct noise or background role.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An intended figure is distinguished from noise or a surrounding background.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The exact record must entail the selected figure-ground failure rather than successful organization.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The selected failure mode prevents the intended figure from remaining identifiable or salient against its ground.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The exact record must preserve the source present-progressive failure state.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The figure-salience failure is actual and ongoing rather than merely possible.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the exact record must entail failure to detect or attend to the intended figure.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The intended figure is missed.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the exact record must entail misidentification of the intended figure as noise.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The intended figure is confused with noise.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the exact record must entail decorative background variation overpowering the figure.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The intended figure is overpowered by decorative background variation.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the exact record must entail contextual background variation overpowering the figure.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The intended figure is overpowered by contextual background variation.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the exact record must entail social background variation overpowering the figure.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The intended figure is overpowered by social background variation.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the exact record must entail statistical background variation overpowering the figure.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "The intended figure is overpowered by statistical background variation.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "The intended figure is being missed, confused with noise, or overpowered by decorative, contextual, social, or statistical background variation.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An intended figure is currently missed, confused with noise, or overpowered by one of four named background variations.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P048-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A figure-ground organization can make the intended figure perfectly salient; the failure state is not universal.", "slug": "figure_ground"}], "residual_id": "r:figure_ground_structuring:b028_a12_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b028_a12_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The intended figure is being missed, confused with noise, or overpowered by decorative, contextual, social, or statistical background variation. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The intended figure is being missed, confused with noise, or overpowered by decorative, contextual, social, or statistical background variation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "If the model captures the systematic signal, or if no systematic signal exists to miss, the exact record says the case is not underfitting; the missed-figure branch therefore survives universally.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Underfitting", "one_liner": "The failure mode where a model's hypothesis class is too restrictive to capture the structure genuinely present in the data — high bias, with training and test error both elevated and close together — curable only by a richer functional form, not by more data or regularization.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:underfitting", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "underfitting"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "underfitting", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P048-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "Underfitting directly instantiates the statistical missed-figure branch: an actual model failure misses genuinely present signal distinguished from noise."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The intended figure is missed, confused with noise, or overpowered by background variation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P048-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O9"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The exact record must preserve a context role and a distinct presentation or isolation operation acting on it.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Consequential context is acted on by a foregrounding, framing, simplification, cropping, or isolation operation.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The exact record must preserve the operation-to-erasure causal direction, not merely co-occurrence.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The operation causes the context to be erased.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The exact record must entail loss or removal of context with the source's negative polarity.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Context is erased rather than preserved, merely deemphasized, or made temporarily less salient.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The exact record must preserve the present-progressive actuality rather than only future risk.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The context-erasure condition is actual and ongoing.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the exact record must entail context erasure caused by aggressive highlighting.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The erasing mechanism is aggressive highlighting.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the exact record must entail context erasure caused by cropping.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The erasing mechanism is cropping.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the exact record must entail context erasure caused by simplification.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The erasing mechanism is simplification.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the exact record must entail context erasure caused by headline framing.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The erasing mechanism is headline framing.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the exact record must entail context erasure caused by interface isolation.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "The erasing mechanism is interface isolation.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Consequential context is being erased by aggressive highlighting, cropping, simplification, headline framing, or interface isolation.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A foregrounding or isolation operation is currently erasing consequential context.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P048-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Figure-ground assignment can preserve and use the ground rather than erase it.", "slug": "figure_ground"}], "residual_id": "r:figure_ground_structuring:b028_a12_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b028_a12_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The context is being erased by aggressive highlighting, cropping, simplification, headline framing, or interface isolation. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The context is being erased by aggressive highlighting, cropping, simplification, headline framing, or interface isolation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_GUARDED_EQUIVALENT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A fabricated deepfake preserves manipulated media but has no erased context and no crop; the qualifier excludes that production-axis counterexample.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Manipulated Media", "one_liner": "A representational artifact whose link to the source event it purports to depict has been silently broken — through deceptive production, attribution, or context — while it retains the surface markers audiences use to infer authenticity.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:manipulated_media", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O6"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "manipulated_media_context_break_by_cropping", "predicate": "The live artifact-to-source break is context manipulation by selective temporal cropping.", "rationale": "Independent publication-safety review confirms the retained expression satisfies a complete DNF branch under its stated classification. The exact record names selective temporal cropping as a context-axis realization; one branch guard narrows the broad DSA to that complete source branch."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "manipulated_media"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The live artifact-to-source break is context manipulation by selective temporal cropping."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "manipulated_media", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P048-C12-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record names selective temporal cropping as a context-axis realization; one branch guard narrows the broad DSA to that complete source branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_GUARDED_EQUIVALENT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A screenshot can discard metadata without cropping; that preserves the DSA but fails O6, and the branch-selection qualifier excludes it.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Image Decontextualization", "one_liner": "The misinformation failure where an authentic, unaltered image circulates stripped of the time, place, attribution, or sequence that fixes its meaning, so an audience reads it as evidence of a situation it never recorded.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:image_decontextualization", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O6"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "image_context_stripping_by_cropping", "predicate": "The operative context-stripping mechanism is cropping.", "rationale": "Independent publication-safety review confirms the retained expression satisfies a complete DNF branch under its stated classification. The DSA supplies the complete actual context-erasure spine, while one atomic guard selects its explicitly named cropping mechanism."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "image_decontextualization"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The operative context-stripping mechanism is cropping."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "image_decontextualization", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P048-C12-U1", "why_it_fits": "The DSA supplies the complete actual context-erasure spine, while one atomic guard selects its explicitly named cropping mechanism."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Aggressive highlighting, cropping, simplification, or framing erases consequential context.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact structure assigns one lead channel and shapes simultaneous support channels to defer in prominence, timing, register, and direction.", "role_mapping": "Primary alert or claim -> lead; contextual channels -> coordinated support.", "slug": "lead_and_support_hierarchy", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b028_a12_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A design must coordinate lead and support channels, such as melody and accompaniment, main claim and backgrounder, primary alert and reference context, or focal actor and institutional setting. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A design must coordinate lead and support channels, such as melody and accompaniment, main claim and backgrounder, primary alert and reference context, or focal actor and institutional setting."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Lead-and-Support Hierarchy", "one_liner": "When multiple simultaneous channels carry related content, one channel takes the lead while the others provide coordinated, structurally subordinate support that actively defers to it in prominence, timing, and register, producing a figure-ground hierarchy across the channels.", "page_ref": "prime:lead_and_support_hierarchy", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Primary alert or claim -> lead; contextual channels -> coordinated support.", "slug": "lead_and_support_hierarchy", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact structure assigns one lead channel and shapes simultaneous support channels to defer in prominence, timing, register, and direction."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Multiple simultaneous channels require one lead and coordinated subordinate support.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Different audiences or tasks legitimately require different figure-ground assignments, creating risk of hidden bias or single-perspective design.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Clarity requires making something stand forward, but meaning requires the surrounding ground. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Different audiences or tasks legitimately require different figure-ground assignments, creating risk of hidden bias or single-perspective design. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Different audiences or tasks legitimately require different figure-ground assignments, creating risk of hidden bias or single-perspective design.", "Clarity requires making something stand forward, but meaning requires the surrounding ground."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Different audiences or tasks legitimately require different figure-ground assignments, creating risk of hidden bias or single-perspective design."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 28, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-028", "ledger_sha256": "0ce0e7678c55bbc31c122201aaf6440b3e36d4f87f6d1698094d11dbc55393a8"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Final Override Prevention", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:final_override_prevention", "slug": "final_override_prevention"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system declares that an actor, institution, community, office, tenant, or subsystem has authority inside a defined domain, but another actor retains practical ability to impose a final contrary outcome. This creates nominal sovereignty with practical subordination: the internal decision process may be elaborate, but final control remains external.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system declares that an actor, institution, community, office, tenant, or subsystem has authority inside a defined domain, but another actor retains practical ability to impose a final contrary outcome. This creates nominal sovereignty with practical subordination: the internal decision process may be elaborate, but final control remains external."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P048-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The exact record must preserve a domain role and a distinct attributed status-description role.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The focal entity is a domain and the attributed item is a status description of that domain.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The exact record must entail a descriptive or claimed status and may not substitute actual authority alone.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The status is asserted or described nominally, not guaranteed as actual final authority.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the exact record must entail an independence description applied to the domain.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The domain is described as independent.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the exact record must entail a self-governing description applied to the domain.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The domain is described as self-governing.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the exact record must entail an autonomy description applied to the domain.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The domain is described as autonomous.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the exact record must entail a sovereignty description applied to the domain.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The domain is described as sovereign.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the exact record must entail a protected-status description applied to the domain.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The domain is described as protected.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the exact record must entail an internal-governance description applied to the domain.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The domain is described as internally governed.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A domain is described as independent, self-governing, autonomous, sovereign, protected, or internally governed.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A domain receives a nominal autonomy, protection, or internal-governance description.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P048-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Sovereignty requires actual final authority and an maintained external boundary, not merely a description or nominal claim.", "slug": "sovereignty"}], "residual_id": "r:final_override_prevention:b028_a13_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b028_a13_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A domain is described as independent, self-governing, autonomous, sovereign, protected, or internally governed. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A domain is described as independent, self-governing, autonomous, sovereign, protected, or internally governed."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Sovereignty requires actual final authority and an maintained external boundary, not merely a description or nominal claim.", "slug": "sovereignty"}], "normalized_requirement": "A domain is described as independent, autonomous, sovereign, protected, or internally governed.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A domain is described as independent, autonomous, sovereign, protected, or internally governed.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P048-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O9"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O10"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O11"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The exact record must preserve distinct external-authority, internal-process, and internally decided outcome roles.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An external authority is distinct from the internal decision process and acts on that process's outcome.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The exact record must entail external control directed at the internal outcome, not merely external influence before decision.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The external authority can override or exercise final control over the internally decided outcome.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The exact record must preserve capability and may not require that an override has already occurred.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The external authority has the capacity to intervene; completed intervention is not required.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The exact record must preserve post-decision timing rather than only participation within the internal process.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The external intervention is available after the internal process has decided.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the exact record must entail external capacity to reverse the internal outcome.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The external authority can reverse the outcome.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the exact record must entail external capacity to replace the internal outcome.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The external authority can replace the outcome.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the exact record must entail external capacity to delay the internal outcome.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The external authority can delay the outcome.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the exact record must entail external capacity to defund implementation of the internal outcome.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The external authority can defund the outcome.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the exact record must entail external capacity to invalidate the internal outcome.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "The external authority can invalidate the outcome.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the exact record must entail external capacity to seize control of the internal outcome.", "obligation_id": "O10", "statement": "The external authority can seize the outcome.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, the exact record must entail external capacity to reconfigure the outcome without disclosure.", "obligation_id": "O11", "statement": "The external authority can silently reconfigure the outcome.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "After an internal process decides, an external authority can reverse, replace, delay, defund, invalidate, seize, or silently reconfigure the outcome.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An external authority retains post-decision capacity to override or control an internally decided outcome.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P048-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Effective external override is explicitly a failure of sovereignty rather than an instance of it.", "slug": "sovereignty"}], "residual_id": "r:final_override_prevention:b028_a13_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b028_a13_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: An external authority can reverse, replace, delay, defund, invalidate, seize, or silently reconfigure the outcome after the internal process decides. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["An external authority can reverse, replace, delay, defund, invalidate, seize, or silently reconfigure the outcome after the internal process decides."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Effective external override is explicitly a failure of sovereignty rather than an instance of it.", "slug": "sovereignty"}], "normalized_requirement": "An external authority can reverse, delay, defund, invalidate, seize, or reconfigure an internally decided outcome.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "An external authority can reverse, delay, defund, invalidate, seize, or reconfigure an internally decided outcome.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P049-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must include an internal decision boundary and an outcome presented as authoritative within it.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A defined internal domain has a process whose decision is nominally authoritative or final.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must include a control external to the internal decision process.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "An appeal, audit, funding, administrative, emergency, platform, or comparable external control exists.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve the control's override function rather than mere review or delay.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The external control can replace, reverse, or impose a contrary final outcome.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail covert or obscured override power, not an openly specified appeal rule.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The control's override function is hidden, disguised, or not acknowledged as final control.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve capability for covert override rather than universal or completed use.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The control can be used this way without requiring that every invocation becomes an override.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "A nominally accountable external control can be used covertly to override a final decision made inside a defined internal domain.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An external control can covertly serve as a final override channel.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P049-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A permission gate openly delays an action and need not be hidden or override a sovereign internal decision.", "slug": "permission_gated_hold"}], "residual_id": "r:final_override_prevention:b028_a13_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b028_a13_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Appeals, audits, funding controls, administrative access, emergency powers, or platform controls can be used as hidden override channels. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Appeals, audits, funding controls, administrative access, emergency powers, or platform controls can be used as hidden override channels."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A permission gate openly delays an action and need not be hidden or override a sovereign internal decision.", "slug": "permission_gated_hold"}], "normalized_requirement": "Appeal, audit, funding, administrative, emergency, or platform controls provide hidden override channels.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Appeal, audit, funding, administrative, emergency, or platform controls provide hidden override channels.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The external actor has incentives to substitute its own preference when the sovereign domain produces an inconvenient decision.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "External oversight and cross-boundary accountability can be legitimate, but if an outside actor can unilaterally substitute a final decision inside the protected domain, the domain is not sovereign in practice. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The external actor has incentives to substitute its own preference when the sovereign domain produces an inconvenient decision. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The external actor has incentives to substitute its own preference when the sovereign domain produces an inconvenient decision.", "External oversight and cross-boundary accountability can be legitimate, but if an outside actor can unilaterally substitute a final decision inside the protected domain, the domain is not sovereign in practice."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "The external actor has incentives to substitute its own preference when the sovereign domain produces an inconvenient decision."}, {"display_text": "Participants distrust the internal process because they expect the final outcome to be overridden elsewhere.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This creates nominal sovereignty with practical subordination: the internal decision process may be elaborate, but final control remains external. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Participants distrust the internal process because they expect the final outcome to be overridden elsewhere. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Participants distrust the internal process because they expect the final outcome to be overridden elsewhere.", "This creates nominal sovereignty with practical subordination: the internal decision process may be elaborate, but final control remains external."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Participants distrust the internal process because they expect the final outcome to be overridden elsewhere."}, {"display_text": "The domain holder needs protection from retaliation, capture, domination, or last-minute substitution while still remaining accountable for boundary-crossing harms.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "External oversight and cross-boundary accountability can be legitimate, but if an outside actor can unilaterally substitute a final decision inside the protected domain, the domain is not sovereign in practice. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: The domain holder needs protection from retaliation, capture, domination, or last-minute substitution while still remaining accountable for boundary-crossing harms. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The domain holder needs protection from retaliation, capture, domination, or last-minute substitution while still remaining accountable for boundary-crossing harms.", "External oversight and cross-boundary accountability can be legitimate, but if an outside actor can unilaterally substitute a final decision inside the protected domain, the domain is not sovereign in practice."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The domain holder needs protection from retaliation, capture, domination, or last-minute substitution while still remaining accountable for boundary-crossing harms."}, {"display_text": "The cost of override is high because it undermines legitimacy, independence, learning, self-determination, or stable delegated authority.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The cost of override is high because it undermines legitimacy, independence, learning, self-determination, or stable delegated authority. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The cost of override is high because it undermines legitimacy, independence, learning, self-determination, or stable delegated authority."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "The cost of override is high because it undermines legitimacy, independence, learning, self-determination, or stable delegated authority."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 28, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-028", "ledger_sha256": "0ce0e7678c55bbc31c122201aaf6440b3e36d4f87f6d1698094d11dbc55393a8"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "First-Class Absence Modeling", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:first_class_absence_modeling", "slug": "first_class_absence_modeling"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A process, schema, interface, proof, workflow, or policy assumes a populated case, then encounters a legitimate empty case. Without a typed representation for absence, handlers confuse emptiness with failure, missing data, nonexistence, ineligibility, denial, zero magnitude, or an exceptional state. The system then branches through unmaintained special cases, loses auditability, or produces misleading outputs.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A process, schema, interface, proof, workflow, or policy assumes a populated case, then encounters a legitimate empty case. Without a typed representation for absence, handlers confuse emptiness with failure, missing data, nonexistence, ineligibility, denial, zero magnitude, or an exceptional state. The system then branches through unmaintained special cases, loses auditability, or produces misleading outputs."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact pattern defines a designated empty member inside a host kind, constructed rather than signaled by failure.", "role_mapping": "No-member result -> designated typed empty member.", "slug": "empty_set", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b028_a14_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A valid query, operation, event, or workflow can return no members or no applicable result. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A valid query, operation, event, or workflow can return no members or no applicable result."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Empty Set", "one_liner": "Absence made into a fully-typed, first-class object rather than an error.", "page_ref": "prime:empty_set", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "No-member result -> designated typed empty member.", "slug": "empty_set", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact pattern defines a designated empty member inside a host kind, constructed rather than signaled by failure."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A valid operation over a host kind can yield a member containing no elements or no applicable result.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The typed empty member keeps handling uniform and operations total rather than returning undefined or error.", "role_mapping": "Well-formed continuation value -> typed empty object.", "slug": "empty_set", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b028_a14_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Downstream handlers still need a well-formed value, record, response, or state to continue. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Downstream handlers still need a well-formed value, record, response, or state to continue."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Empty Set", "one_liner": "Absence made into a fully-typed, first-class object rather than an error.", "page_ref": "prime:empty_set", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Well-formed continuation value -> typed empty object.", "slug": "empty_set", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The typed empty member keeps handling uniform and operations total rather than returning undefined or error."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Downstream handling requires a well-formed value of the host type in order to continue.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Explicit separation of typed emptiness from undefined, unknown, missing, and error is mandatory.", "role_mapping": "Empty -> designated member; other absence states -> excluded impostors.", "slug": "empty_set", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b028_a14_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The difference between empty, unknown, error, denied, not applicable, not yet loaded, and zero materially changes interpretation. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The difference between empty, unknown, error, denied, not applicable, not yet loaded, and zero materially changes interpretation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Empty Set", "one_liner": "Absence made into a fully-typed, first-class object rather than an error.", "page_ref": "prime:empty_set", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Empty -> designated member; other absence states -> excluded impostors.", "slug": "empty_set", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Explicit separation of typed emptiness from undefined, unknown, missing, and error is mandatory."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Empty, unknown, error, denied, not applicable, pending, and zero have materially different meanings.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Identity-element, base-case, and vacuous-truth roles make operations total on the empty member.", "role_mapping": "Empty boundary -> identity and base case.", "slug": "empty_set", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b028_a14_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Aggregation, ordering, embedding, comparison, or membership operations must remain total at the empty boundary. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Aggregation, ordering, embedding, comparison, or membership operations must remain total at the empty boundary."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Empty Set", "one_liner": "Absence made into a fully-typed, first-class object rather than an error.", "page_ref": "prime:empty_set", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Empty boundary -> identity and base case.", "slug": "empty_set", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Identity-element, base-case, and vacuous-truth roles make operations total on the empty member."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Aggregation, ordering, embedding, comparison, or membership operations must remain total at the empty boundary.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P049-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must include one empty-case condition and plural consumers that encounter it.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A legitimate empty case must be processed by a system with multiple downstream consumers.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail distributed or duplicated handling across consumers.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Empty-case handling is implemented separately in those consumers.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve absence of centralized empty-case representation or handling.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A shared type, schema, contract, or equivalent central specification does not own the empty-case semantics.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve the decentralized-versus-centralized architecture contrast.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Responsibility is scattered downstream rather than centralized once for all consumers.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Handling for a legitimate empty case is implemented separately across multiple downstream consumers instead of once in a shared type, schema, or contract.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Empty-case handling is decentralized across consumers rather than encoded centrally.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P049-C05-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime is the centralized typed remedy; a valid empty set need not coexist with scattered special-case handlers.", "slug": "empty_set"}], "residual_id": "r:first_class_absence_modeling:b028_a14_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b028_a14_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Edge-case handling is currently scattered across consumers instead of centralized in the type, schema, or contract. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Edge-case handling is currently scattered across consumers instead of centralized in the type, schema, or contract."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_GUARDED_EQUIVALENT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A data class for pricing logic is a complete candidate instance that is unrelated to absence, preventing a direct edge; the guard removes only that domain counterexample.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Data Class", "one_liner": "Flag an object-oriented class that holds fields with getters and setters but no domain methods as a symptom that its behavior migrated outward into consumers, then resolve the verdict with one role question — should this class enforce its own invariants?", "page_ref": "domain_specific:data_class", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "migrated_behavior_is_empty_case_semantics", "predicate": "The behavior and invariants migrated out of the data class are the semantics for one legitimate empty-case condition.", "rationale": "Exact-record counterexample testing found no complete candidate instance, with the emitted qualifier if any, that falsifies the selected DNF branch."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "data_class"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "migrated_behavior_is_empty_case_semantics"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "data_class", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P049-C05-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record preserves the downstream-versus-central ownership contrast even though a data holder exists; a single domain restriction supplies the legitimate-empty-case role."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_GUARDED_EQUIVALENT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A unit-of-measure primitive is a complete candidate instance but not an absence case, so direct entailment fails; the guard excludes that content-neutral counterexample.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Primitive Obsession", "one_liner": "The code smell of representing domain concepts that carry structural commitments — units, valid ranges, well-formedness, identity — as bare primitives like int or string, so the type system cannot enforce the distinctions and they survive only as validation duplicated at every callsite.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:primitive_obsession", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "flattened_concept_is_empty_case", "predicate": "The flattened domain concept is the legitimate empty-case condition encountered by the callsites.", "rationale": "Exact-record counterexample testing found no complete candidate instance, with the emitted qualifier if any, that falsifies the selected DNF branch."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "primitive_obsession"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "flattened_concept_is_empty_case"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "primitive_obsession", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P049-C05-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record directly entails decentralized duplicated handling and absent central type enforcement; one domain restriction identifies the structured concept as the empty case."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Empty-case handling is scattered across consumers rather than centralized in a type, schema, or contract.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Users, auditors, or automated agents must know whether absence was expected, verified, temporary, or anomalous.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Users, auditors, or automated agents must know whether absence was expected, verified, temporary, or anomalous. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Users, auditors, or automated agents must know whether absence was expected, verified, temporary, or anomalous."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Users, auditors, or automated agents must know whether absence was expected, verified, temporary, or anomalous."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 28, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-028", "ledger_sha256": "0ce0e7678c55bbc31c122201aaf6440b3e36d4f87f6d1698094d11dbc55393a8"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": [{"groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AUDITED_SHARED_NEGATIVE", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A consumer that need not distinguish an expected out-of-validity null from meaningful field state could use the field unchecked without the defensive contamination required by the exact record.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Temporary Field", "one_liner": "The code smell in which an object carries an instance variable meaningful only during one operation or state yet visible as permanent structural state everywhere — a mismatch between the field's structural scope (every instance) and its validity scope (the subset where it holds a real value).", "page_ref": "domain_specific:temporary_field", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "temporary_field"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "temporary_field", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P049-C04-U1", "why_it_fits": "The shared-negative audit rescues this edge: every temporary-field instance has an expected absent/default state outside validity scope, and every consumer must determine that status by convention or check before acting."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A counterexample with an unmarked or unexplained zero-content view is excluded because the candidate requires the explanatory message and intentionality cue as fixed slots.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Empty State Design", "one_liner": "The UI practice of deliberately designing the zero-content view — treating it as a first-class state with a fixed four-slot template (message, intentionality cue, call-to-action, optional sample) rather than whatever the populated layout degrades to.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:empty_state_design", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "empty_state_design"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "empty_state_design", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P049-C04-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires a first-class zero-content state, a user-facing explanation, and an intentionality cue that distinguishes an intentional empty state from loading or failure; that directly satisfies the expectation-status unit."}], "publication_role": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT_ONLY", "source_residual_occurrence_id": "r:first_class_absence_modeling:b028_a14_c5", "unit": {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P049-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must include an absence that is a meaningful case rather than simple nonexistence.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A process, record, interface, or decision contains a legitimate absent or empty case.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must include an interpreter for whom the absence status matters.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A user, auditor, automated agent, or comparable interpreter must act on or assess that absence.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must make expectation status knowable to the relevant interpreter.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The interpreter must be able to determine whether the absence was expected.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail a need to know the expectation status.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Determining expectation status is required, not merely optional metadata.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "Users, auditors, or automated agents must be able to determine whether a legitimate absence was expected.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Absence interpreters need the absence's expectation status.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P049-C04-U1"}}, {"groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A fully confirmable positive finding is a candidate instance that is not an absence case, blocking direct entailment; the domain guard excludes that case without changing the audit relation.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Confirmability", "one_liner": "Certify a qualitative finding as objective not by eliminating the interpreter but by exhibiting an audit trail through which any claim can be walked backward to the data segments that produced it.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:confirmability", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "audited_finding_is_legitimate_absence_claim", "predicate": "The audited qualitative finding is a claim that a legitimate absence occurred.", "rationale": "Exact-record counterexample testing found no complete candidate instance, with the emitted qualifier if any, that falsifies the selected DNF branch."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "confirmability"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "audited_finding_is_legitimate_absence_claim"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "confirmability", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P049-C04-U2", "why_it_fits": "Confirmability directly supplies required, auditable verification, but it is content-neutral; one domain restriction to a legitimate absence completes the source relation."}], "publication_role": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT_ONLY", "source_residual_occurrence_id": "r:first_class_absence_modeling:b028_a14_c5", "unit": {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P049-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must include an absence that is a meaningful case rather than simple nonexistence.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A process, record, interface, or decision contains a legitimate absent or empty case.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must include an interpreter for whom the absence status matters.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A user, auditor, automated agent, or comparable interpreter must act on or assess that absence.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must make verification status knowable to the relevant interpreter.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The interpreter must be able to determine whether the absence has been verified.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail a need to know the verification status.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Determining verification status is required, not merely optional metadata.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "Users, auditors, or automated agents must be able to determine whether a legitimate absence was verified.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Absence interpreters need the absence's verification status.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P049-C04-U2"}}, {"groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A permanent empty state whose message merely explains its cause remains a complete candidate instance but fails the source; the guard rules out precisely that case.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Empty State Design", "one_liner": "The UI practice of deliberately designing the zero-content view — treating it as a first-class state with a fixed four-slot template (message, intentionality cue, call-to-action, optional sample) rather than whatever the populated layout degrades to.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:empty_state_design", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O3", "O4"], "guard_type": "OTHER", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "empty_state_message_reports_temporal_status", "predicate": "The required explanatory message states whether the legitimate empty result is temporary or persistent.", "rationale": "Exact-record counterexample testing found no complete candidate instance, with the emitted qualifier if any, that falsifies the selected DNF branch."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "empty_state_design"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "empty_state_message_reports_temporal_status"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "empty_state_design", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P049-C04-U3", "why_it_fits": "The exact record establishes the required message slot and empty-state legibility, while temporal status is contingent and therefore must be supplied by one atomic context guard."}], "publication_role": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT_ONLY", "source_residual_occurrence_id": "r:first_class_absence_modeling:b028_a14_c5", "unit": {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P049-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must include an absence that is a meaningful case rather than simple nonexistence.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A process, record, interface, or decision contains a legitimate absent or empty case.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must include an interpreter for whom the absence status matters.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A user, auditor, automated agent, or comparable interpreter must act on or assess that absence.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must make the duration or temporary status of the absence knowable.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The interpreter must be able to determine whether the absence is temporary.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail a need to know whether the absence is temporary.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Determining temporal status is required, not merely optional metadata.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "Users, auditors, or automated agents must be able to determine whether a legitimate absence is temporary.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Absence interpreters need the absence's temporal status.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P049-C04-U3"}}, {"groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A zero-content view indistinguishable from an error would violate the candidate-defined legibility guarantee and is therefore not a complete counterexample.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Empty State Design", "one_liner": "The UI practice of deliberately designing the zero-content view — treating it as a first-class state with a fixed four-slot template (message, intentionality cue, call-to-action, optional sample) rather than whatever the populated layout degrades to.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:empty_state_design", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "empty_state_design"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "empty_state_design", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P049-C04-U4", "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires the interface to announce an intentional empty state rather than a broken or error state, directly making anomaly status knowable and required."}], "publication_role": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT_ONLY", "source_residual_occurrence_id": "r:first_class_absence_modeling:b028_a14_c5", "unit": {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P049-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must include an absence that is a meaningful case rather than simple nonexistence.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A process, record, interface, or decision contains a legitimate absent or empty case.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must include an interpreter for whom the absence status matters.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A user, auditor, automated agent, or comparable interpreter must act on or assess that absence.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must make anomaly status knowable to the relevant interpreter.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The interpreter must be able to determine whether the absence is anomalous.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail a need to know whether the absence is anomalous.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Determining anomaly status is required, not merely optional metadata.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "Users, auditors, or automated agents must be able to determine whether a legitimate absence is anomalous.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Absence interpreters need the absence's anomaly status.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P049-C04-U4"}}]}
{"archetype": {"name": "First-Mover Advantage Capture", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:first_mover_advantage_capture", "slug": "first_mover_advantage_capture"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A time-ordered opportunity rewards actors differently depending on sequence position. Moving too late allows others to capture scarce resources, standards, user expectations, network effects, or learning curves. Moving too early exposes the actor to uncertainty, education costs, premature infrastructure, imitation, and commitment to a wrong trajectory. Without a disciplined first-mover advantage design, teams confuse speed with advantage or caution with wisdom.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A time-ordered opportunity rewards actors differently depending on sequence position. Moving too late allows others to capture scarce resources, standards, user expectations, network effects, or learning curves. Moving too early exposes the actor to uncertainty, education costs, premature infrastructure, imitation, and commitment to a wrong trajectory. Without a disciplined first-mover advantage design, teams confuse speed with advantage or caution with wisdom."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Order-dependent payoff for an otherwise identical move is the defining temporal asymmetry.", "role_mapping": "Move timing -> sequence rank; changed payoff -> order dependence.", "slug": "first_mover_advantage", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b028_a15_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The payoff of the same move changes materially depending on when it occurs. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The payoff of the same move changes materially depending on when it occurs."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "First Mover Advantage", "one_liner": "When a contest rewards early arrival, the same move yields a different return depending on when in the sequence it is taken.", "page_ref": "prime:first_mover_advantage", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Move timing -> sequence rank; changed payoff -> order dependence.", "slug": "first_mover_advantage", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Order-dependent payoff for an otherwise identical move is the defining temporal asymmetry."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The same move yields a materially different payoff depending on when in the sequence it occurs.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact structure requires a first-bindable scarce position and a binding mechanism with a persistence interval.", "role_mapping": "Scarce position -> first-bindable resource; early action -> binding mechanism.", "slug": "first_mover_advantage", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b028_a15_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: There is a scarce, rivalrous, or path-dependent position that early action can secure. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["There is a scarce, rivalrous, or path-dependent position that early action can secure."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "First Mover Advantage", "one_liner": "When a contest rewards early arrival, the same move yields a different return depending on when in the sequence it is taken.", "page_ref": "prime:first_mover_advantage", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Scarce position -> first-bindable resource; early action -> binding mechanism.", "slug": "first_mover_advantage", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact structure requires a first-bindable scarce position and a binding mechanism with a persistence interval."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A scarce, rivalrous, or path-dependent position can be durably bound by early action.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P049-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve early participation rather than participation at an unspecified or later position.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Participation occurs early relative to the opportunity's sequence.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must connect early participation causally to the named learning effect.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Early participation is the causal source of the learning effect.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail a compounding learning effect without requiring any particular internal compounding pathway.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The resulting learning effect is compounding rather than one-time or static.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve possibility rather than completed conduct, inevitability, or universal success.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Early participation can create the effect but need not actually do so in every instance or opportunity.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "Early participation can create a compounding learning effect.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Early participation can create compounding learning effects.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P049-C06-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P049-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve early participation rather than participation at an unspecified or later position.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Participation occurs early relative to the opportunity's sequence.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must connect early participation causally to the named data effect.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Early participation is the causal source of the data effect.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail a compounding data effect without requiring any particular internal compounding pathway.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The resulting data effect is compounding rather than one-time or static.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve possibility rather than completed conduct, inevitability, or universal success.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Early participation can create the effect but need not actually do so in every instance or opportunity.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "Early participation can create a compounding data effect.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Early participation can create compounding data effects.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P049-C06-U2"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P049-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve early participation rather than participation at an unspecified or later position.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Participation occurs early relative to the opportunity's sequence.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must connect early participation causally to the named network effect.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Early participation is the causal source of the network effect.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail a compounding network effect without requiring any particular internal compounding pathway.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The resulting network effect is compounding rather than one-time or static.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve possibility rather than completed conduct, inevitability, or universal success.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Early participation can create the effect but need not actually do so in every instance or opportunity.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "Early participation can create a compounding network effect.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Early participation can create compounding network effects.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P049-C06-U3"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P049-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve early participation rather than participation at an unspecified or later position.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Participation occurs early relative to the opportunity's sequence.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must connect early participation causally to the named standard effect.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Early participation is the causal source of the standard effect.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail a compounding standard effect without requiring any particular internal compounding pathway.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The resulting standard effect is compounding rather than one-time or static.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve possibility rather than completed conduct, inevitability, or universal success.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Early participation can create the effect but need not actually do so in every instance or opportunity.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "Early participation can create a compounding standard effect.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Early participation can create compounding standard effects.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P049-C06-U4"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P049-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve early participation rather than participation at an unspecified or later position.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Participation occurs early relative to the opportunity's sequence.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must connect early participation causally to the named brand effect.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Early participation is the causal source of the brand effect.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail a compounding brand effect without requiring any particular internal compounding pathway.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The resulting brand effect is compounding rather than one-time or static.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve possibility rather than completed conduct, inevitability, or universal success.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Early participation can create the effect but need not actually do so in every instance or opportunity.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "Early participation can create a compounding brand effect.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Early participation can create compounding brand effects.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P049-C06-U5"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P049-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve early participation rather than participation at an unspecified or later position.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Participation occurs early relative to the opportunity's sequence.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must connect early participation causally to the named reputation effect.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Early participation is the causal source of the reputation effect.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail a compounding reputation effect without requiring any particular internal compounding pathway.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The resulting reputation effect is compounding rather than one-time or static.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve possibility rather than completed conduct, inevitability, or universal success.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Early participation can create the effect but need not actually do so in every instance or opportunity.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "Early participation can create a compounding reputation effect.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Early participation can create compounding reputation effects.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P049-C06-U6"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P049-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve early participation rather than participation at an unspecified or later position.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Participation occurs early relative to the opportunity's sequence.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must connect early participation causally to the named switching-cost effect.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Early participation is the causal source of the switching-cost effect.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail a compounding switching-cost effect without requiring any particular internal compounding pathway.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The resulting switching-cost effect is compounding rather than one-time or static.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve possibility rather than completed conduct, inevitability, or universal success.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Early participation can create the effect but need not actually do so in every instance or opportunity.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "Early participation can create a compounding switching-cost effect.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Early participation can create compounding switching-cost effects.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P049-C06-U7"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A first mover can bind a rival resource directly without any listed compounding mechanism.", "slug": "first_mover_advantage"}], "residual_id": "r:first_mover_advantage_capture:b028_a15_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b028_a15_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Early participation can create compounding learning, data, network, standard, brand, reputation, or switching-cost effects. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Early participation can create compounding learning, data, network, standard, brand, reputation, or switching-cost effects."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 7, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 7}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A first mover can bind a rival resource directly without any listed compounding mechanism.", "slug": "first_mover_advantage"}], "normalized_requirement": "Early participation creates compounding learning, data, network, standard, brand, reputation, or switching-cost effects.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 7 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Early participation creates compounding learning, data, network, standard, brand, reputation, or switching-cost effects.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime identifies an order payoff but does not require delay to generate useful information.", "slug": "first_mover_advantage"}], "residual_id": "r:first_mover_advantage_capture:b028_a15_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b028_a15_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Delaying preserves information but risks losing the option to shape the field. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Delaying preserves information but risks losing the option to shape the field."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime identifies an order payoff but does not require delay to generate useful information.", "slug": "first_mover_advantage"}], "normalized_requirement": "Delay preserves information but risks losing the option to shape the field.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Delay preserves information but risks losing the option to shape the field.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Followers can copy visible lessons unless the early mover converts learning into defensibility.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Followers can copy visible lessons unless the early mover converts learning into defensibility. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Followers can copy visible lessons unless the early mover converts learning into defensibility."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Followers can copy visible lessons unless the early mover converts learning into defensibility."}, {"display_text": "Stakeholders are debating whether to launch, reserve, seed, commit, or wait without an explicit sequence-payoff model.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Stakeholders are debating whether to launch, reserve, seed, commit, or wait without an explicit sequence-payoff model. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders are debating whether to launch, reserve, seed, commit, or wait without an explicit sequence-payoff model."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Stakeholders are debating whether to launch, reserve, seed, commit, or wait without an explicit sequence-payoff model."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 28, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-028", "ledger_sha256": "0ce0e7678c55bbc31c122201aaf6440b3e36d4f87f6d1698094d11dbc55393a8"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Fixed-Sum Payoff Governance", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:fixed_sum_payoff_governance", "slug": "fixed_sum_payoff_governance"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A strategic interaction is being handled without a clear distinction between conserved-payoff transfer and value creation. Actors either escalate over a fixed prize without legitimate rules, or they misclassify a fixed-sum tradeoff as a collaborative design problem and obscure the distributional loss borne by someone else.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A strategic interaction is being handled without a clear distinction between conserved-payoff transfer and value creation. Actors either escalate over a fixed prize without legitimate rules, or they misclassify a fixed-sum tradeoff as a collaborative design problem and obscure the distributional loss borne by someone else."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Every exact instance fixes the total payoff over the action profiles and reduces the problem to distribution.", "role_mapping": "Fixed prize or share -> invariant total payoff.", "slug": "zero_sum_game", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b029_a01_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Actors either escalate over a fixed prize without legitimate rules, or they misclassify a fixed-sum tradeoff as a collaborative design problem and obscure the distributional loss borne by someone else. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The relevant resource, rank, seat, prize, budget share, liability share, or formal right is fixed over the decision horizon.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The relevant resource, rank, seat, prize, budget share, liability share, or formal right is fixed over the decision horizon.", "Actors either escalate over a fixed prize without legitimate rules, or they misclassify a fixed-sum tradeoff as a collaborative design problem and obscure the distributional loss borne by someone else."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Zero Sum Game", "one_liner": "The total payoff across participants is fixed, so one party's gain is necessarily another's equal loss and the only strategic question is distribution.", "page_ref": "prime:zero_sum_game", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Fixed prize or share -> invariant total payoff.", "slug": "zero_sum_game", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Every exact instance fixes the total payoff over the action profiles and reduces the problem to distribution."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The relevant resource, rank, seat, prize, budget share, liability share, or formal right is fixed over the decision horizon.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Equal loss paired with each gain is the defining fixed-total invariant.", "role_mapping": "Actor gain -> payoff increase; other loss -> offsetting payoff decrease.", "slug": "zero_sum_game", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b029_a01_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: One actor’s improvement mechanically reduces another actor’s outcome by an equal or near-equal amount within the defined boundary. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["One actor’s improvement mechanically reduces another actor’s outcome by an equal or near-equal amount within the defined boundary."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Zero Sum Game", "one_liner": "The total payoff across participants is fixed, so one party's gain is necessarily another's equal loss and the only strategic question is distribution.", "page_ref": "prime:zero_sum_game", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Actor gain -> payoff increase; other loss -> offsetting payoff decrease.", "slug": "zero_sum_game", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Equal loss paired with each gain is the defining fixed-total invariant."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "One actor's improvement mechanically reduces another actor's outcome by an equal amount inside the boundary.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact pattern is a multi-participant game whose payoffs depend on joint action profiles.", "role_mapping": "Anticipatory choices -> strategic action profile.", "slug": "zero_sum_game", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b029_a01_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Participants are making strategic choices in anticipation of others’ choices, not merely submitting independent needs. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Participants are making strategic choices in anticipation of others’ choices, not merely submitting independent needs."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Zero Sum Game", "one_liner": "The total payoff across participants is fixed, so one party's gain is necessarily another's equal loss and the only strategic question is distribution.", "page_ref": "prime:zero_sum_game", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Anticipatory choices -> strategic action profile.", "slug": "zero_sum_game", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact pattern is a multi-participant game whose payoffs depend on joint action profiles."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Participants choose strategically in anticipation of the other participants' choices.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P049-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must include a proposed transfer whose loss side is available to be concealed.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A proposed transfer has a loss side that could be concealed.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must connect the actor's incentive specifically to concealment of the proposed transfer's loss side.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "An actor has an incentive directed toward hiding that loss side.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail motivation or incentive only; completed, ongoing, or attempted conduct is not required.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The incentive exists without requiring that the actor performs the incentivized conduct.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "Actors have incentives to hide the loss side of a proposed transfer.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An actor is incentivized to conceal the loss side of a proposed transfer.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P049-C09-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P049-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must include a redistribution and the contrasting value-creation representation.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A redistribution has a contrasting value-creation label that could be applied to it.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must connect the actor's incentive specifically to substituting a value-creation label for redistribution.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "An actor has an incentive directed toward relabeling the redistribution as value creation.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail motivation or incentive only; completed, ongoing, or attempted conduct is not required.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The incentive exists without requiring that the actor performs the incentivized conduct.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "Actors have incentives to relabel redistribution as value creation.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An actor is incentivized to present redistribution as value creation.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P049-C09-U2"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P049-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must include a loss and a nonparticipant destination distinct from the incentivized actor.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A loss could be shifted to one or more nonparticipants.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must connect the actor's incentive specifically to externalization of loss onto nonparticipants.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "An actor has an incentive directed toward shifting the loss to the nonparticipants.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail motivation or incentive only; completed, ongoing, or attempted conduct is not required.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The incentive exists without requiring that the actor performs the incentivized conduct.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "Actors have incentives to externalize loss to nonparticipants.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An actor is incentivized to shift loss onto nonparticipants.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P049-C09-U3"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A zero-sum contest can be transparently described and confined to its participants.", "slug": "zero_sum_game"}], "residual_id": "r:fixed_sum_payoff_governance:b029_a01_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b029_a01_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Actors have incentives to hide the loss side of a proposed transfer, relabel redistribution as value creation, or externalize loss to nonparticipants. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Actors have incentives to hide the loss side of a proposed transfer, relabel redistribution as value creation, or externalize loss to nonparticipants."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 3, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 3}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A zero-sum contest can be transparently described and confined to its participants.", "slug": "zero_sum_game"}], "normalized_requirement": "Actors hide the loss side, relabel redistribution as value creation, or externalize loss to nonparticipants.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 3 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Actors hide the loss side, relabel redistribution as value creation, or externalize loss to nonparticipants.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The joint-move diagnostic in every exact instance finds no action profile in which all participants strictly improve.", "role_mapping": "No enlargement path -> absence of joint upside inside the game boundary.", "slug": "zero_sum_game", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b029_a01_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The relevant decision must be made before the pie can be enlarged, or no credible enlargement path exists inside the time and authority boundary. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The relevant decision must be made before the pie can be enlarged, or no credible enlargement path exists inside the time and authority boundary."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Zero Sum Game", "one_liner": "The total payoff across participants is fixed, so one party's gain is necessarily another's equal loss and the only strategic question is distribution.", "page_ref": "prime:zero_sum_game", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "No enlargement path -> absence of joint upside inside the game boundary.", "slug": "zero_sum_game", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The joint-move diagnostic in every exact instance finds no action profile in which all participants strictly improve."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "No joint-positive enlargement path exists inside the operative time and authority boundary.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A rule, contest, auction, adjudication, bargaining process, or allocation protocol must decide who receives the fixed payoff.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The system needs a decisive distribution of fixed payoff, but any distribution creates loss for someone. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: A rule, contest, auction, adjudication, bargaining process, or allocation protocol must decide who receives the fixed payoff. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A rule, contest, auction, adjudication, bargaining process, or allocation protocol must decide who receives the fixed payoff.", "The system needs a decisive distribution of fixed payoff, but any distribution creates loss for someone."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "A rule, contest, auction, adjudication, bargaining process, or allocation protocol must decide who receives the fixed payoff."}, {"display_text": "The system needs legitimacy because any winning outcome also produces identifiable losers.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The system needs legitimacy because any winning outcome also produces identifiable losers. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The system needs legitimacy because any winning outcome also produces identifiable losers."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The system needs legitimacy because any winning outcome also produces identifiable losers."}, {"display_text": "Worst-case reasoning, strategic randomization, or adversarial planning is relevant because opponent gain and own loss are tightly coupled.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Worst-case reasoning, strategic randomization, or adversarial planning is relevant because opponent gain and own loss are tightly coupled. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Worst-case reasoning, strategic randomization, or adversarial planning is relevant because opponent gain and own loss are tightly coupled."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 8, "text": "Worst-case reasoning, strategic randomization, or adversarial planning is relevant because opponent gain and own loss are tightly coupled."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 29, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-029", "ledger_sha256": "44a68c156a21a81f938ebbc6a5322602952e71553f758ffe6a5e3a13f6ce7285"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Flow Channel Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:flow_channel_design", "slug": "flow_channel_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 5, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 3, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 3, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 3 of 5 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a mismatch among task demand, current capability, feedback, and continuity. A capable person can still fail to engage if the task hides its goal, withholds feedback, fragments attention, or jumps too far beyond current skill. A motivated group can still drift if the work is underchallenging or if every useful stretch is interrupted before it stabilizes.\n\nThis archetype treats boredom, overwhelm, and distraction as signals about the designed environment rather than as fixed personal traits. The question is not “Why are people unfocused?” but “What about this task, feedback system, difficulty level, or interruption pattern prevents focus from becoming sustainable?”", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "People are bored, overwhelmed, distracted, or under-feedbacked because the task environment does not match challenge to skill, does not show progress, or repeatedly breaks attention. The result is shallow work, disengagement, avoidable errors, stalled learning, or failure to persist."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P049-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must include both a task and the skill level of its participant.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A participant with an identifiable current skill level undertakes or faces a task.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve the low-challenge direction relative to skill, not difficulty in isolation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The task's challenge is lower than is appropriate for that current skill level.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve the contemporaneous skill baseline.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The comparison uses the participant's current skill rather than a past or hypothetical skill level.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "A task's challenge is too low relative to the participant's current skill.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Task challenge falls below current skill.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P049-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Network flow models optimize conserved quantities through graphs and do not describe psychological challenge-skill mismatch.", "slug": "network_flow_models"}], "residual_id": "r:flow_channel_design:b029_a02_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b029_a02_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The task is too easy relative to current skill. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The task is too easy relative to current skill."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Network flow models optimize conserved quantities through graphs and do not describe psychological challenge-skill mismatch.", "slug": "network_flow_models"}], "normalized_requirement": "Task challenge is too low relative to current skill.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Task challenge is too low relative to current skill.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P049-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must include the task, participant, current skill, and available support baseline.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A participant with an identifiable current skill level and available support faces a task.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve the contemporaneous skill-and-support comparison.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The capacity baseline is the participant's current skill and support.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfying the difficulty branch must entail excessive task difficulty relative to current capacity.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The task's difficulty is too high for the current skill and support baseline.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfying the ambiguity branch must entail unmanageable ambiguity relative to current capacity.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The task's ambiguity is too high for the current skill and support baseline.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfying the risk branch must entail unmanageable risk relative to current capacity.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The task's risk is too high for the current skill and support baseline.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfying the complexity branch must entail excessive complexity relative to current capacity.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The task's complexity is too high for the current skill and support baseline.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "At least one dimension of a task's demands exceeds what the participant's current skill and support can manage: difficulty, ambiguity, risk, or complexity.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A task-demand dimension exceeds current skill and support.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P049-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Limited attention can bind on an easy task and does not entail a challenge-skill mismatch.", "slug": "attentional_capacity"}], "residual_id": "r:flow_channel_design:b029_a02_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b029_a02_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The task is too hard, ambiguous, risky, or complex relative to current skill and support. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The task is too hard, ambiguous, risky, or complex relative to current skill and support."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A too-hidden emergency control is a complete candidate instance that need not overwhelm a novice, defeating a direct edge; the branch guard removes exactly that instance class.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Progressive-Disclosure Failure", "one_liner": "Diagnose an interface's usability breakdowns as a single mistuning between its staging schedule and the readiness of the users and tasks it actually meets, read off by whether too much is hidden or too much exposed.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:progressive_disclosure_failure", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O6"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "progressive_disclosure_too_exposed_branch", "predicate": "The schedule-readiness gap is the too-exposed branch, where optionality overwhelms the current user and task.", "rationale": "Exact-record counterexample testing found no complete candidate instance, with the emitted qualifier if any, that falsifies the selected DNF branch."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "progressive_disclosure_failure"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "progressive_disclosure_too_exposed_branch"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "progressive_disclosure_failure", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P049-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record is a directed mismatch between presented complexity and current readiness, but the candidate is disjunctive; selecting its too-exposed branch yields one complete source DNF branch."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Task challenge, ambiguity, risk, or complexity exceeds current skill and support.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P049-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must include a task actor and an ensuing action that feedback could guide.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A participant performs a task and must choose a next action.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve the action-guidance role of the feedback channel.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Feedback about performance, state, or progress is the relevant input for guiding that next action.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfying the absence branch must entail that no relevant feedback is supplied.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The relevant feedback is absent.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfying the delay branch must entail delayed delivery of relevant feedback.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The relevant feedback is delayed.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfying the noise branch must entail a degraded or confounded feedback signal.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The relevant feedback is noisy.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfying the punitive branch must entail feedback delivered or structured as punishment.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The relevant feedback is punitive.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfying the abstraction branch must entail feedback too general or abstract for action selection.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The relevant feedback is too abstract to guide the next action.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Feedback relevant to a participant's next action is absent, delayed, noisy, punitive, or too abstract to guide that action.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Action-relevant feedback is absent or has one of four named defects.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P049-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A feedback loop can be timely, clear, supportive, and action-guiding.", "slug": "feedback"}], "residual_id": "r:flow_channel_design:b029_a02_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b029_a02_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Feedback is absent, delayed, noisy, punitive, or too abstract to guide the next action. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Feedback is absent, delayed, noisy, punitive, or too abstract to guide the next action."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A view that supplies usable state feedback or a next action is excluded by the candidate definition and cannot serve as a complete counterexample.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Empty-State Failure", "one_liner": "The interface condition in which a view has no content and provides no scaffolding for the absence — no explanation of the cause, no disambiguation among the possible causes (new, filtered, permission, loading, error), and no next action — so the user, left to infer meaning from nothing, typically concludes wrongly that the system is broken or gated.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:empty_state_failure", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "empty_state_failure"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "empty_state_failure", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P049-C12-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record directly defines a view with no state explanation, no cause disambiguation, and no next action, so the action-relevant feedback absence branch is entailed."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A consistently high-specificity alarm channel would not instantiate alarm fatigue, so the attempted clean-signal counterexample is excluded by definition.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Alarm Fatigue", "one_liner": "Reframe an operator's habitual silencing of clinical alarms as the rational response to a warning channel whose predictive value has collapsed, relocating the fix from the operator's discipline to the channel's specificity.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:alarm_fatigue", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "alarm_fatigue"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "alarm_fatigue", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P049-C12-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every exact instance contains a warning channel with collapsed predictive value that is informationally confounded for the operator action, directly satisfying the noisy-feedback branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A current picture delivered within the decision tolerance would not be situational-awareness collapse, so it cannot defeat the direct relation.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Situational-Awareness Collapse", "one_liner": "Locate a control failure under tempo in the picture-keeping pipeline rather than in missing data — a rate problem where perception, comprehension, or projection can no longer cycle fast enough to keep the decision-maker's model current.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:situational_awareness_collapse", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "situational_awareness_collapse"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "situational_awareness_collapse", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P049-C12-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires the environment to outrun the perception-comprehension-projection pipeline, so decisions use delayed state information and the delay branch is directly entailed."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A faint but present persistent mode indicator can still participate in mode error and defeats direct absence; the guard excludes only that candidate branch.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Mode Error", "one_liner": "The interaction failure in which the same user action is interpreted differently by a system depending on a hidden mode the user does not perceive — the user acts correctly for the mode they believe is active, and the system, in the actually active mode, does something else.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:mode_error", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O3"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "mode_indicator_absent_branch", "predicate": "The active-mode indicator is absent rather than merely weak or peripheral.", "rationale": "Exact-record counterexample testing found no complete candidate instance, with the emitted qualifier if any, that falsifies the selected DNF branch."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "mode_error"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "mode_indicator_absent_branch"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "mode_error", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P049-C12-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record supplies the user-action/state-feedback spine but allows three indicator defects, so only the explicit absent-indicator branch entails the source absence branch."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Feedback is absent, delayed, noisy, punitive, or too abstract to guide the next action.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P049-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must include skilled performance with a load-bearing continuity requirement.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An actor performs an activity whose skilled execution requires continuity.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail repeated disruption.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Interruptions, context switches, or comparable disruptions recur rather than occurring only once.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must preserve the direction from disruptions to continuity loss.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The recurring disruptions break the continuity of the activity.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must connect the broken continuity to the performance requirement, not an unrelated sequence.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The lost continuity is the continuity needed for skilled performance.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Recurring interruptions or context switches break the continuity required for skilled performance.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Repeated disruptions break continuity needed for skilled performance.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P049-C13-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Attention can be capacity-limited without repeated external interruptions or loss of skilled continuity.", "slug": "attentional_capacity"}], "residual_id": "r:flow_channel_design:b029_a02_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b029_a02_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Interruptions or context switches repeatedly break the continuity needed for skilled performance. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Interruptions or context switches repeatedly break the continuity needed for skilled performance."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Routine unskilled throughput can suffer specification churn and is a valid candidate counterexample to direct entailment; the guard excludes precisely that role type.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Requirements Churn", "one_liner": "A project pathology in which the specification changes faster than the execution organization can absorb it — a control-theoretic case where the reference signal outruns the controller's bandwidth, so no spec lives long enough for work to consolidate against it.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:requirements_churn", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1", "O4"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "execution_work_is_skilled_activity", "predicate": "The execution organization is performing skilled work.", "rationale": "Exact-record counterexample testing found no complete candidate instance, with the emitted qualifier if any, that falsifies the selected DNF branch."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "requirements_churn"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "execution_work_is_skilled_activity"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "requirements_churn", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P049-C13-U1", "why_it_fits": "Requirements churn directly supplies recurrence and lost consolidation, while one domain restriction supplies the skilled-activity typing shared by the first and fourth obligations."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A one-time interruption or a transition with no performance cost is not a complete task-switching-cost instance, so neither defeats the direct edge.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Task-Switching Cost", "one_liner": "Isolate the performance penalty paid at the moment of changing between rule-sets — separate from either task's steady-state difficulty — by contrasting switch trials against repeat trials in the same mixed block, and split it into a preparation-reducible part and an irreducible residual.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:task_switching_cost", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "task_switching_cost"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "task_switching_cost", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P049-C13-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact mixed-block paradigm requires plural switches between well-practised rule sets and a transition-specific performance decrement, directly entailing recurring continuity disruption."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Interruptions or context switches repeatedly break continuity needed for skilled performance.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B5", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P049-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"], ["O1", "O3"], ["O1", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must include an activity and its goal, not an arbitrary unknown fact.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An activity has a goal that organizes or directs participant action.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfying the vagueness branch must entail an indeterminate activity goal.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The activity goal is vague or insufficiently determinate.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfying the movement branch must entail temporal instability of the goal.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The activity goal moves or changes while the activity proceeds.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfying the hiddenness branch must entail that the relevant actor cannot access the goal.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The activity goal is hidden or inaccessible to the participant.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "An activity's goal is insufficiently determinate, changes during the activity, or is inaccessible to the participant.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An activity goal is vague, moving, or hidden.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P049-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A problem representation can state a clear stable goal; vagueness or movement is not mandatory.", "slug": "problem_representation"}], "residual_id": "r:flow_channel_design:b029_a02_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b029_a02_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The goal of the activity is vague, moving, or hidden. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The goal of the activity is vague, moving, or hidden."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A problem representation can state a clear stable goal; vagueness or movement is not mandatory.", "slug": "problem_representation"}], "normalized_requirement": "The activity's goal is vague, moving, or hidden.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The activity's goal is vague, moving, or hidden.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 5", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 29, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-029", "ledger_sha256": "44a68c156a21a81f938ebbc6a5322602952e71553f758ffe6a5e3a13f6ce7285"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Flow Channelization", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:flow_channelization", "slug": "flow_channelization"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 4, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 5 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 4 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is ungovernable diffusion. Something moves, but it moves through too many paths, across unclear boundaries, or into surrounding systems that are not designed to receive it. Because the movement is diffuse, the system cannot reliably see it, own it, prioritize it, protect it, or repair failures.\n\nCommon symptoms include requests arriving in private inboxes instead of a service path, water spreading across streets instead of drains, vehicles of different speeds competing in the same space, data moving through untracked scripts, or sensitive people/materials/events passing through ordinary paths that expose others to risk.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Flow is diffuse, uncontrolled, or spilling across boundaries, making it hard to direct, measure, or contain."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P049-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must include an actual transported flow rather than a static network alone.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A quantity, signal, material, or comparable flow moves through a path-bearing system.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Every candidate instance must entail plural diffuse routing rather than one channel.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The flow spreads through many distinct paths.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfying the informality branch must entail many informally constituted flow paths.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The many paths are informal or not formally defined as channels.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfying the control branch must entail many uncontrolled flow paths.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The many paths are uncontrolled or not subject to effective direction or containment.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A transported quantity spreads through many paths that are informal or uncontrolled.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Flow disperses across many informal or uncontrolled paths.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P049-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A flow necessarily has a medium and direction but can remain in one fully controlled channel.", "slug": "flow"}], "residual_id": "r:flow_channelization:b029_a03_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b029_a03_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when important flow is arriving through too many informal paths, spreading into spaces that cannot safely absorb it, or remaining invisible until failure. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Flow spreads through many informal or uncontrolled paths.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Flow spreads through many informal or uncontrolled paths.", "Use this archetype when important flow is arriving through too many informal paths, spreading into spaces that cannot safely absorb it, or remaining invisible until failure."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A permanently confined single channel would not build the candidate-defined fan by successive avulsing lobes, so it is not a complete counterexample.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Alluvial Fan", "one_liner": "The fan-shaped sediment landform built where a confined, sediment-laden channel exits a steep upland at a slope break, loses transport competence, and deposits its load coarse-to-fine as successive lobes avulse radially around the apex.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:alluvial_fan", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "alluvial_fan"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "alluvial_fan", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P049-C15-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires repeated avulsion that distributes flow and sediment through successive radial lobes, directly satisfying the uncontrolled-many-path branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A porous-medium aquifer with one surface-mapped route is explicitly excluded from karst and cannot defeat the direct relation.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Karst", "one_liner": "Diagnose a landscape where acidic groundwater has dissolved soluble bedrock into a self-reinforcing hidden conduit network, so the surface no longer maps the subsurface drainage and porous-media terrain rules are suspended.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:karst", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "karst"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "karst", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P049-C15-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every exact karst instance contains groundwater routed through a self-reinforcing conduit network whose hidden paths defeat ordinary containment and topographic direction, satisfying the uncontrolled branch."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Flow spreads through many informal or uncontrolled paths.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P050-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve boundary-crossing or escaped flow and a system affected by that spillover.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The roles are spillover from a focal flow and a distinct affected system.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the adjacency limit rather than arbitrary remote harm.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The affected system is adjacent to the source or channel of the spillover.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve causal direction from spillover to damage in the adjacent system.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The spillover causes damage to the adjacent system.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail completed damage, not merely possible exposure, vulnerability, or risk.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Damage to the adjacent system has actually occurred rather than remaining a possibility or risk.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "Spillover damages adjacent systems.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Spillover causes actual damage to an adjacent system.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P050-C01-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P050-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve spillover as the risk source and a distinct exposed role.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Spillover from a focal flow exposes a system, population, information context, or environment to risk.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the direction from spillover to risk generation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The spillover creates the risk.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve risk modality and may not require that the harm has already occurred.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The outcome is exposure to possible harm rather than necessarily completed harm.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must entail spillover-generated risk to safety.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The spillover creates safety risk.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must entail spillover-generated risk to fair treatment or distribution.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The spillover creates fairness risk.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must entail spillover-generated risk to privacy.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The spillover creates privacy risk.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must entail spillover-generated risk to the environment.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The spillover creates environmental risk.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Spillover creates safety, fairness, privacy, or environmental risk.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Spillover creates risk in a specified protected domain.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P050-C01-U2"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An externality may be beneficial, pecuniary, or unrelated to a transported flow escaping its channel.", "slug": "externality"}], "residual_id": "r:flow_channelization:b029_a03_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b029_a03_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when mixed flows interfere with each other, when spillover harms adjacent systems, or when service, data, water, traffic, or case movement needs a clear path before it can be governed. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Spillover damages adjacent systems or creates safety, fairness, privacy, or environmental risk.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Spillover damages adjacent systems or creates safety, fairness, privacy, or environmental risk.", "It is especially useful when mixed flows interfere with each other, when spillover harms adjacent systems, or when service, data, water, traffic, or case movement needs a clear path before it can be governed."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PARTIALLY_DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Correct train-only imputation would falsify the unit but is expressly outside the candidate, so no complete candidate counterexample survives.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Imputation Leakage", "one_liner": "The model-evaluation failure in which a missing-value repair step is fit across the train/test boundary, so its parameters encode facts about the held-out rows — inflating performance that survives into the test metric, because imputation, mentally filed as data cleaning, is really a model.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:imputation_leakage", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "imputation_leakage"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "imputation_leakage", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P050-C01-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every imputation-leakage instance crosses the train-test firewall and actually biases the held-out metric; the distinct evaluation partition supplies the adjacent affected-system role."}], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 2, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 1, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An externality may be beneficial, pecuniary, or unrelated to a transported flow escaping its channel.", "slug": "externality"}], "normalized_requirement": "Spillover damages adjacent systems or creates safety, fairness, privacy, or environmental risk.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "PARTIAL_EXISTING_DSA_GROUNDING", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation grounded 1 of 2 eligible atomic units; the remaining unit or units stayed open."}, "predicate": "Spillover damages adjacent systems or creates safety, fairness, privacy, or environmental risk.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Multiplexing is designed to separate streams on one channel and does not require interference.", "slug": "multiplexing"}], "residual_id": "r:flow_channelization:b029_a03_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b029_a03_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Multiple flow classes interfere with one another. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Multiple flow classes interfere with one another."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Multiplexing is designed to separate streams on one channel and does not require interference.", "slug": "multiplexing"}], "normalized_requirement": "Multiple flow classes interfere with one another.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Multiple flow classes interfere with one another.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P050-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an important flow rather than arbitrary hidden information.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The focal entity is a flow important to operation, safety, or another load-bearing outcome.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail invisibility or unobservability of the flow.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The important flow is not observable.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve that detection is unavailable until after failure, not merely delayed for an unspecified interval.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The unobservability persists through the pre-failure and failure periods and is not relieved before the post-failure period.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "Important flow is invisible until after failure.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An important flow remains unobservable until the post-failure period.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P050-C02-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A leak can be immediately visible and detected before damage or system failure.", "slug": "escape_and_leakage"}], "residual_id": "r:flow_channelization:b029_a03_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b029_a03_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Important flow is invisible until after failure. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Important flow is invisible until after failure."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A leak can be immediately visible and detected before damage or system failure.", "slug": "escape_and_leakage"}], "normalized_requirement": "Important flow remains invisible until after failure.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Important flow remains invisible until after failure.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P050-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an already existing channel that could otherwise be used.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An existing channel is available to carry a focal flow or interaction.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve deficient clarity rather than another channel defect.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The channel's operation, routing, or use is unclear to relevant users.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail unclear-channel-to-bypass direction, not mere coexistence.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The lack of clarity causes the existing channel to be bypassed.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "An existing channel is bypassed because it is unclear.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Lack of clarity in an existing channel causes that channel to be bypassed.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P050-C03-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P050-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an already existing channel that could otherwise be used.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An existing channel is available to carry a focal flow or interaction.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve channel overload rather than a generic design defect.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Demand on the channel exceeds or strains its usable capacity.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail overloaded-channel-to-bypass direction, not mere congestion.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The overload causes the existing channel to be bypassed.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "An existing channel is bypassed because it is overloaded.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Overload in an existing channel causes that channel to be bypassed.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P050-C03-U2"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P050-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an existing channel and relevant prospective users or flows.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An existing channel is intended or available in principle to carry a focal flow or interaction.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve practical inaccessibility rather than inconvenience alone.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Relevant users or flows cannot access the channel in practice.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail inaccessible-channel-to-bypass direction.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The inaccessibility causes the existing channel to be bypassed.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "An existing channel is bypassed because it is inaccessible.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Inaccessibility of an existing channel causes that channel to be bypassed.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P050-C03-U3"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P050-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an existing channel and actors whose use depends on trust in it.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An existing channel and relevant users or senders occupy distinct channel and trust-holder roles.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve mistrust rather than mere unfamiliarity or ambiguity.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Relevant actors do not trust the channel.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail mistrust-to-bypass direction, not trust loss after bypass.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The mistrust causes the existing channel to be bypassed.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "An existing channel is bypassed because it is mistrusted.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Mistrust of an existing channel causes that channel to be bypassed.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P050-C03-U4"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Gatekeeping can be clear, trusted, accessible, and appropriately loaded.", "slug": "gatekeeping"}], "residual_id": "r:flow_channelization:b029_a03_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b029_a03_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Existing channels are bypassed because they are unclear, overloaded, inaccessible, or mistrusted. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Existing channels are bypassed because they are unclear, overloaded, inaccessible, or mistrusted."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 4, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 4}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Gatekeeping can be clear, trusted, accessible, and appropriately loaded.", "slug": "gatekeeping"}], "normalized_requirement": "Official channels are bypassed because they are unclear, overloaded, inaccessible, or mistrusted.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 4 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Official channels are bypassed because they are unclear, overloaded, inaccessible, or mistrusted.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 29, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-029", "ledger_sha256": "44a68c156a21a81f938ebbc6a5322602952e71553f758ffe6a5e3a13f6ce7285"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Flow Diversion / Rerouting", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:flow_diversion_or_rerouting", "slug": "flow_diversion_or_rerouting"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 2 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 2}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A flow's current path is blocked, congested, hazardous, compromised, unavailable, or strategically unacceptable while the flow's purpose must continue.", "explanation_source": {"field": "diagnostic_head", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A flow's current path is blocked, congested, hazardous, compromised, unavailable, or strategically unacceptable while the flow's purpose must continue."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "This branch preserves the complete remedy-free diagnostic route; goals, feasibility clauses, gates, deployment constraints, and supporting context remain outside the DNF."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "EXT001-C049", "dnf": [["EXT001-U049-O1"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"obligation_id": "EXT001-U049-O1", "predicate": "The currently used path for a flow is blocked, congested, hazardous, compromised, failing, or unavailable."}], "predicate": "The currently used path for a flow is blocked, congested, hazardous, compromised, failing, or unavailable.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "The currently used path for a flow is blocked, congested, hazardous, compromised, failing, or unavailable.", "unit_id": "EXT001-U049"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"catalog_exhaustion": "CONDITION_LEVEL", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The currently used path for a flow is blocked, congested, hazardous, compromised, failing, or unavailable.", "slug": "escape_and_leakage"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The currently used path for a flow is blocked, congested, hazardous, compromised, failing, or unavailable.", "slug": "blockage_release_dynamics"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The currently used path for a flow is blocked, congested, hazardous, compromised, failing, or unavailable.", "slug": "access_catchment"}], "residual_id": "EXT001:flow_diversion_or_rerouting:C01", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding."}}, "condition_id": "ext001_flow_diversion_or_rerouting_a01", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored essence_one_line, compression_statement, components fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: The currently used path for a flow is blocked, congested, hazardous, compromised, failing, or unavailable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The currently used path for a flow is blocked, congested, hazardous, compromised, failing, or unavailable."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The currently used path for a flow is blocked, congested, hazardous, compromised, failing, or unavailable.", "slug": "escape_and_leakage"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The currently used path for a flow is blocked, congested, hazardous, compromised, failing, or unavailable.", "slug": "blockage_release_dynamics"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The currently used path for a flow is blocked, congested, hazardous, compromised, failing, or unavailable.", "slug": "access_catchment"}], "normalized_requirement": "The currently used path for a flow is blocked, congested, hazardous, compromised, failing, or unavailable.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The currently used path for a flow is blocked, congested, hazardous, compromised, failing, or unavailable.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "EXT001-C050", "dnf": [["EXT001-U050-O1"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"obligation_id": "EXT001-U050-O1", "predicate": "The transported quantity or service must continue reaching its destination."}], "predicate": "The transported quantity or service must continue reaching its destination.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "The transported quantity or service must continue reaching its destination.", "unit_id": "EXT001-U050"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"catalog_exhaustion": "CONDITION_LEVEL", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The transported quantity or service must continue reaching its destination.", "slug": "selective_propagation"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The transported quantity or service must continue reaching its destination.", "slug": "unevenness_waste"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The transported quantity or service must continue reaching its destination.", "slug": "logistics_overreach"}], "residual_id": "EXT001:flow_diversion_or_rerouting:C02", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding."}}, "condition_id": "ext001_flow_diversion_or_rerouting_a02", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored essence_one_line, compression_statement, components fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: The transported quantity or service must continue reaching its destination.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The transported quantity or service must continue reaching its destination."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The transported quantity or service must continue reaching its destination.", "slug": "selective_propagation"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The transported quantity or service must continue reaching its destination.", "slug": "unevenness_waste"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The transported quantity or service must continue reaching its destination.", "slug": "logistics_overreach"}], "normalized_requirement": "The transported quantity or service must continue reaching its destination.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The transported quantity or service must continue reaching its destination.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A viable alternate route exists or can be created.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored essence_one_line, compression_statement, components fields; the source file was not modified. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: A viable alternate route exists or can be created. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A viable alternate route exists or can be created.", "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored essence_one_line, compression_statement, components fields; the source file was not modified."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "A viable alternate route exists or can be created."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"candidate_ledger_sha256": "96f72d2139077fd57bf795048ebef33b3fd574b20963170080ec916b5b3b92fe", "extension_id": "new-archetypes-extension-001", "ledger_id": "prime-production-v1.2-extension-001", "ledger_sha256": "9644520614744632d1d36da44b1acd77ce432852c6083eb871203521c166efce"}, "base_projection_sha256": "841e0c7f3cb8e8054475ad29a8a14745a416b4fc115559a44878b94292e673ec", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "ca09ed9fe1598ce7072755b530de5553f5ee0a7cd64ae82d9e4a4e2149a37788", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Fluency-Based Preference Exploitation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:fluency_based_preference_exploitation", "slug": "fluency_based_preference_exploitation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 2 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 2}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A target that may be useful, valid, benign, or strategically important is evaluated with friction because it is unfamiliar, cognitively effortful, visually novel, socially unestablished, or not yet integrated into routine recognition. Decision makers may reject, ignore, or undervalue it before substantive merits are considered. Conversely, a communicator may be tempted to improve preference by changing claims, incentives, or coercive pressure when the structural bottleneck is simpler: the target lacks fluency and familiarity.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A target that may be useful, valid, benign, or strategically important is evaluated with friction because it is unfamiliar, cognitively effortful, visually novel, socially unestablished, or not yet integrated into routine recognition. Decision makers may reject, ignore, or undervalue it before substantive merits are considered. Conversely, a communicator may be tempted to improve preference by changing claims, incentives, or coercive pressure when the structural bottleneck is simpler: the target lacks fluency and familiarity."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P050-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a target under evaluation and its novelty-linked unfamiliarity.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A sufficiently new target is evaluated by one or more decision makers.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must connect unfamiliarity to a sufficiently new target, not familiarity loss from another cause.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The target is new enough to be unfamiliar to the relevant evaluators.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail unfamiliarity-to-lower-evaluation direction.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The unfamiliarity causes the target's evaluation to decrease.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the source's actual depressing effect, not only a risk of lower evaluation.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The depressive effect on evaluation is actual and ongoing rather than merely possible.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "A target is new enough that unfamiliarity is depressing its evaluation.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Unfamiliarity with a sufficiently new target lowers its evaluation.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P050-C04-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P050-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a target under possible adoption and its novelty-linked unfamiliarity.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A sufficiently new target is available for adoption by potential users or decision makers.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must connect unfamiliarity to a sufficiently new target, not uptake barriers from another cause.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The target is new enough to be unfamiliar to the relevant adopters.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail unfamiliarity-to-lower-adoption direction.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The unfamiliarity causes adoption of the target to decrease.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the source's actual depressing effect, not only a risk of lower adoption.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The depressive effect on adoption is actual and ongoing rather than merely possible.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "A target is new enough that unfamiliarity is depressing its adoption.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Unfamiliarity with a sufficiently new target lowers its adoption.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P050-C04-U2"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Processing fluency is distinct from familiarity; a novel target can be fluent and a familiar target disfluent.", "slug": "processing_fluency"}], "residual_id": "r:fluency_based_preference_exploitation:b029_a04_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b029_a04_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The target is new enough that unfamiliarity is depressing evaluation or adoption. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The target is new enough that unfamiliarity is depressing evaluation or adoption."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 2, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 2}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Processing fluency is distinct from familiarity; a novel target can be fluent and a familiar target disfluent.", "slug": "processing_fluency"}], "normalized_requirement": "Unfamiliarity with a new target depresses its evaluation or adoption.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 2 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Unfamiliarity with a new target depresses its evaluation or adoption.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime is subjective processing ease influencing evaluative judgment independent of content.", "role_mapping": "Ease of recognition or understanding -> processing fluency; evaluation -> fluency-based judgment.", "slug": "processing_fluency", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b029_a04_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Processing ease is plausibly part of the evaluation: people must recognize, remember, navigate, or feel comfortable with the target. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Processing ease is plausibly part of the evaluation: people must recognize, remember, navigate, or feel comfortable with the target."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Processing Fluency", "one_liner": "Cognitive ease with stimulus influences judgment independent of content.", "page_ref": "prime:processing_fluency", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Ease of recognition or understanding -> processing fluency; evaluation -> fluency-based judgment.", "slug": "processing_fluency", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime is subjective processing ease influencing evaluative judgment independent of content."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Subjective ease of recognizing, remembering, navigating, or understanding the target influences evaluation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The desired outcome is mild liking, acceptance, recall, reduced resistance, or readiness to consider rather than deep persuasion by argument alone.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: The desired outcome is mild liking, acceptance, recall, reduced resistance, or readiness to consider rather than deep persuasion by argument alone. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The desired outcome is mild liking, acceptance, recall, reduced resistance, or readiness to consider rather than deep persuasion by argument alone."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "The desired outcome is mild liking, acceptance, recall, reduced resistance, or readiness to consider rather than deep persuasion by argument alone."}, {"display_text": "The target can be encountered repeatedly without changing its substantive content or violating consent boundaries.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Repeated exposure can make a target feel easier and safer to evaluate, but the same mechanism can substitute familiarity for evidence, quality, consent, or genuine value. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: The target can be encountered repeatedly without changing its substantive content or violating consent boundaries. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The target can be encountered repeatedly without changing its substantive content or violating consent boundaries.", "Repeated exposure can make a target feel easier and safer to evaluate, but the same mechanism can substitute familiarity for evidence, quality, consent, or genuine value."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "The target can be encountered repeatedly without changing its substantive content or violating consent boundaries."}, {"display_text": "There are available touchpoints where exposure can be repeated without interrupting the user, audience, learner, or stakeholder.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Repeated exposure can make a target feel easier and safer to evaluate, but the same mechanism can substitute familiarity for evidence, quality, consent, or genuine value. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: There are available touchpoints where exposure can be repeated without interrupting the user, audience, learner, or stakeholder. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["There are available touchpoints where exposure can be repeated without interrupting the user, audience, learner, or stakeholder.", "Repeated exposure can make a target feel easier and safer to evaluate, but the same mechanism can substitute familiarity for evidence, quality, consent, or genuine value."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "There are available touchpoints where exposure can be repeated without interrupting the user, audience, learner, or stakeholder."}, {"display_text": "The design can monitor overexposure, annoyance, reactance, or negative associations.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: The design can monitor overexposure, annoyance, reactance, or negative associations. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The design can monitor overexposure, annoyance, reactance, or negative associations."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The design can monitor overexposure, annoyance, reactance, or negative associations."}, {"display_text": "The context can remain neutral or mildly positive rather than threatening, deceptive, or coercive.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: The context can remain neutral or mildly positive rather than threatening, deceptive, or coercive. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The context can remain neutral or mildly positive rather than threatening, deceptive, or coercive."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "The context can remain neutral or mildly positive rather than threatening, deceptive, or coercive."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 29, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-029", "ledger_sha256": "44a68c156a21a81f938ebbc6a5322602952e71553f758ffe6a5e3a13f6ce7285"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Focal Emphasis Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:focal_emphasis_design", "slug": "focal_emphasis_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 5, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 2, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 2, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 2 of 5 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is misallocated perceptual priority. Something in the field should guide understanding or action, but the field gives equal or greater prominence to something else. The resulting failure can look like confusion, missed warnings, wrong clicks, poor recall, shallow interpretation, or alert fatigue.\n\nThe failure often comes from accumulation. A design starts with one useful cue, then gains more colors, badges, headings, annotations, urgent labels, and visual decorations until no cue has special force. Focal Emphasis Design restores a controlled relationship between priority and notice.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A design, message, interface, space, chart, lesson, warning, or decision surface contains the important element, but perceptual priority is misallocated. The intended focal item is missed, treated as ordinary, drowned by surrounding cues, or displaced by a more visually or emotionally dominant but less important element."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P050-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve distinct audience and intended guiding-element roles.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An audience encounters an element assigned a guiding role.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail audience-side overlooking rather than absence of the element.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The audience fails to notice or attend to the guiding element.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve recurrent or regular overlooking.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The overlooking occurs routinely rather than as a single isolated miss.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the element's intended guiding role, not incidental influence.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The element is normatively or intentionally supposed to guide the relevant function.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must preserve an intended interpretation-guiding function.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The overlooked element should guide interpretation.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must preserve an intended action-guiding function.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The overlooked element should guide action.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must preserve an intended safety-guiding function.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The overlooked element should guide safety-relevant judgment or conduct.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must preserve an intended learning-guiding function.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The overlooked element should guide learning.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "An audience routinely overlooks an element that should guide interpretation, action, safety, or learning.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An audience repeatedly fails to notice an element intended to guide a specified interpretive or practical function.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P050-C05-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An effective focal point is intentionally noticed; being overlooked is the inverse failure state.", "slug": "emphasis_focal_point"}], "residual_id": "r:focal_emphasis_design:b029_a05_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b029_a05_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The audience routinely overlooks the element that should guide interpretation, action, safety, or learning. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The audience routinely overlooks the element that should guide interpretation, action, safety, or learning."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A prompt read deliberatively each time is not confirmation fatigue, so it does not supply a complete counterexample.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Confirmation Fatigue", "one_liner": "The interaction-design failure where a blocking confirmation prompt fires so often, and so rarely marks a truly consequential choice, that users develop an automatic dismiss reflex that discharges the prompt without reading it — leaving it syntactically present but informationally inert.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:confirmation_fatigue", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "confirmation_fatigue"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "confirmation_fatigue", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P050-C05-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every complete instance repeatedly presents an action-guiding confirmation that users discharge without reading, satisfying the action branch."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The audience overlooks the element that should guide interpretation, action, safety, or learning.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P050-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require a many-element field and must not be satisfied by exactly two elements or another merely small plurality.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Many elements, not merely two or another small field, are simultaneously presented for attention or interpretation.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve apparent equality of importance across the elements.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The elements appear equal in importance rather than perceptually prioritized.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the direction from shared presentation treatment to apparent equal priority.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Equality on the selected presentation dimension causes the apparent equality of importance.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must entail size uniformity across the elements.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The elements share the same size.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must entail weight uniformity across the elements.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The elements share the same visual or typographic weight.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must entail color uniformity across the elements.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The elements share the same color treatment.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must entail placement uniformity across the elements.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The elements share the same placement treatment.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must entail rhetorical-intensity uniformity across the elements.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The elements share the same rhetorical intensity.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Many elements appear equally important because they share the same size, weight, color, placement, or rhetorical intensity.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Uniformity on a salient presentation dimension causes many elements to appear equally important.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P050-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime creates intentional hierarchy and does not require a prior all-equal field.", "slug": "emphasis_focal_point"}], "residual_id": "r:focal_emphasis_design:b029_a05_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b029_a05_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Many elements appear equally important because they share the same size, weight, color, placement, or rhetorical intensity. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Many elements appear equally important because they share the same size, weight, color, placement, or rhetorical intensity."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime creates intentional hierarchy and does not require a prior all-equal field.", "slug": "emphasis_focal_point"}], "normalized_requirement": "Many elements appear equally important because perceptual intensity is uniform.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Many elements appear equally important because perceptual intensity is uniform.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P050-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve distinct distractor and substantive-priority roles.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A non-primary element and a distinct substantive priority compete for audience attention.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the direction of the attention inequality.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The non-primary element attracts more notice than the substantive priority.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the unintended character of the distractor's dominance.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The attention displacement is accidental rather than intentionally designed.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must preserve a secondary-element distractor role.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The attention-dominant non-primary element is secondary to the substantive priority.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must preserve a decorative-element distractor role.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The attention-dominant non-primary element is decorative.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A secondary or decorative element accidentally attracts more notice than the substantive priority.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A non-primary element unintentionally attracts more attention than the substantive priority.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P050-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A focal design can align notice perfectly with substantive priority and contain no distracting decoration.", "slug": "emphasis_focal_point"}], "residual_id": "r:focal_emphasis_design:b029_a05_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b029_a05_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A secondary or decorative element accidentally attracts more notice than the substantive priority. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A secondary or decorative element accidentally attracts more notice than the substantive priority."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A focal design can align notice perfectly with substantive priority and contain no distracting decoration.", "slug": "emphasis_focal_point"}], "normalized_requirement": "A secondary or decorative element attracts more attention than the substantive priority.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A secondary or decorative element attracts more attention than the substantive priority.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime is the achieved marking of a meaningful focal point, not a weak-presence failure.", "slug": "emphasis_focal_point"}], "residual_id": "r:focal_emphasis_design:b029_a05_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b029_a05_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The focal element has high consequence, urgency, explanatory value, or decision relevance but weak perceptual presence. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The focal element has high consequence, urgency, explanatory value, or decision relevance but weak perceptual presence."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime is the achieved marking of a meaningful focal point, not a weak-presence failure.", "slug": "emphasis_focal_point"}], "normalized_requirement": "A consequential or urgent focal element has weak perceptual presence.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A consequential or urgent focal element has weak perceptual presence.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B5", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P050-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve presentation cues within a design rather than unrelated accumulated items.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A design contains multiple attention-seeking cues of one or more kinds.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve accumulation or proliferation, not a sparse static composition.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The cues have accumulated into a proliferating set over time or successive additions.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve accumulation-to-salience-loss direction.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The accumulation causes loss of reliable salience across the cue set.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the source's none-of-them endpoint, not merely reduced salience for some cues.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "No cue in the accumulated set stands out reliably.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}], "predicate": "A design has accumulated badges, colors, alerts, headings, controls, annotations, or calls to action until none stand out reliably.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Accumulation of competing cues causes none of them to remain reliably salient.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P050-C08-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A focal-point design can begin in a sparse composition without accumulated competing cues.", "slug": "emphasis_focal_point"}], "residual_id": "r:focal_emphasis_design:b029_a05_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b029_a05_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The design has accumulated badges, colors, alerts, headings, controls, annotations, or calls to action until none of them stand out reliably. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The design has accumulated badges, colors, alerts, headings, controls, annotations, or calls to action until none of them stand out reliably."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A reliably salient confirmation would interrupt the uniform dismiss reflex and therefore would not preserve a complete candidate instance.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Confirmation Fatigue", "one_liner": "The interaction-design failure where a blocking confirmation prompt fires so often, and so rarely marks a truly consequential choice, that users develop an automatic dismiss reflex that discharges the prompt without reading it — leaving it syntactically present but informationally inert.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:confirmation_fatigue", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "confirmation_fatigue"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "confirmation_fatigue", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P050-C08-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires prompt accumulation, habituation caused by that accumulation, and identical dismissal of the rare consequential prompt."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A cue that remains reliably salient would contradict the informationally bankrupt warning-channel equilibrium.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Alarm Fatigue", "one_liner": "Reframe an operator's habitual silencing of clinical alarms as the rational response to a warning channel whose predictive value has collapsed, relocating the fix from the operator's discipline to the channel's specificity.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:alarm_fatigue", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "alarm_fatigue"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "alarm_fatigue", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P050-C08-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record makes aggregate alarm volume causally produce a warning channel in which no individual alarm is reliably distinguishable."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Accumulated badges, colors, alerts, headings, controls, or calls to action prevent reliable salience.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 5", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "DISJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A comparison, exception, anomaly, threshold, warning, next step, or key distinction exists but needs to be found quickly under real conditions.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when people scan quickly, operate under stress, compare several items, interpret dense data, learn a new distinction, or face a high-consequence warning. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: A comparison, exception, anomaly, threshold, warning, next step, or key distinction exists but needs to be found quickly under real conditions. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A comparison, exception, anomaly, threshold, warning, next step, or key distinction exists but needs to be found quickly under real conditions.", "It is especially useful when people scan quickly, operate under stress, compare several items, interpret dense data, learn a new distinction, or face a high-consequence warning."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "A comparison, exception, anomaly, threshold, warning, next step, or key distinction exists but needs to be found quickly under real conditions."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 29, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-029", "ledger_sha256": "44a68c156a21a81f938ebbc6a5322602952e71553f758ffe6a5e3a13f6ce7285"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Form-Content Congruence Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:form_content_congruence_design", "slug": "form_content_congruence_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A work or system has content that matters, but the structure through which it is presented, enacted, constrained, or used does not match that content. The form may overstate, hide, flatten, fragment, decorate, mis-sequence, legalize, formalize, or proceduralize the substance in ways that change how people interpret or act on it. Because the mismatch is embedded in the carrier itself, adding explanation after the fact does not reliably fix the problem.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A work or system has content that matters, but the structure through which it is presented, enacted, constrained, or used does not match that content. The form may overstate, hide, flatten, fragment, decorate, mis-sequence, legalize, formalize, or proceduralize the substance in ways that change how people interpret or act on it. Because the mismatch is embedded in the carrier itself, adding explanation after the fact does not reliably fix the problem."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact failure preserves target elements while misencoding a task-relevant relation so the consumer traverses, infers, or acts incorrectly.", "role_mapping": "Present content -> element-complete medium; failed use -> relational divergence.", "slug": "representational_structure_mismatch", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b029_a06_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A message, rule, artifact, experience, or model is technically present but is not being understood, trusted, used, or enacted as intended. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A message, rule, artifact, experience, or model is technically present but is not being understood, trusted, used, or enacted as intended."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Representational Structure Mismatch", "one_liner": "A representation preserves its target's elements but misstates one or more task-relevant relations among them, so content can appear complete while its shape licenses the wrong traversal, inference, or action.", "page_ref": "prime:representational_structure_mismatch", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Present content -> element-complete medium; failed use -> relational divergence.", "slug": "representational_structure_mismatch", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact failure preserves target elements while misencoding a task-relevant relation so the consumer traverses, infers, or acts incorrectly."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Content is present, but the representation's structure prevents intended understanding, use, or enactment.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P050-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O9"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve cross-context reuse rather than original design within one context.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A carrier form is copied or reused from a source context in a different receiving context.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve distinct borrowed-form and receiving-content roles.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The receiving context has content whose fit to the borrowed form is at issue.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve absence of fit checking and need not assert that mismatch is proven.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "No check is made of whether the borrowed form fits the content.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must preserve cross-context reuse of a format.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The borrowed carrier is a format.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must preserve cross-context reuse of a genre.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The borrowed carrier is a genre.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must preserve cross-context reuse of a template.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The borrowed carrier is a template.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must preserve cross-context reuse of an interface.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The borrowed carrier is an interface.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must preserve cross-context reuse of a procedure.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The borrowed carrier is a procedure.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must preserve cross-context reuse of an institutional form.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "The borrowed carrier is an institutional form.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A format, genre, template, interface, procedure, or institutional form is copied from another context without checking whether it fits the content.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A carrier form is reused across contexts without checking its fit to the receiving content.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P050-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The form-content relation can be deliberately designed in its original context and need not involve copying or neglected fit checks.", "slug": "form_and_content"}], "residual_id": "r:form_content_congruence_design:b029_a06_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b029_a06_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A format, genre, template, interface, procedure, or institutional form has been copied from another context without checking whether it fits the content. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A format, genre, template, interface, procedure, or institutional form has been copied from another context without checking whether it fits the content."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The form-content relation can be deliberately designed in its original context and need not involve copying or neglected fit checks.", "slug": "form_and_content"}], "normalized_requirement": "A form copied from another context is used without checking fit to the new content.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A form copied from another context is used without checking fit to the new content.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's completeness trap is precisely surface content remaining present while encoded relations license the wrong inference or action.", "role_mapping": "Stated content -> preserved elements; induced action -> consumer operation over wrong relation.", "slug": "representational_structure_mismatch", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b029_a06_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Users or readers keep separating what something says from what its structure causes them to do. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Users or readers keep separating what something says from what its structure causes them to do."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Representational Structure Mismatch", "one_liner": "A representation preserves its target's elements but misstates one or more task-relevant relations among them, so content can appear complete while its shape licenses the wrong traversal, inference, or action.", "page_ref": "prime:representational_structure_mismatch", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Stated content -> preserved elements; induced action -> consumer operation over wrong relation.", "slug": "representational_structure_mismatch", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's completeness trap is precisely surface content remaining present while encoded relations license the wrong inference or action."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "What an artifact says diverges from what its structure causes users to infer or do.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P050-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve formal conformity and a substantive role affected by it.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Formal compliance and the substance it purports to preserve occupy distinct form and content roles.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve apparent preservation rather than verified substantive preservation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The formal compliance only appears to preserve the substance.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve actual substantive erosion associated with formal compliance.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "In actuality, the formal compliance hollows out or erodes the intended substance.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the appearance-actuality reversal, not erosion without a preservation appearance.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Apparent preservation conflicts with actual hollowing of the same substance.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must preserve erosion of intended function.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The hollowed substance is an intended function.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must preserve erosion of intended value.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The hollowed substance is an intended value.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must preserve erosion of intended obligation.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The hollowed substance is an intended obligation.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Formal compliance appears to preserve substance while actually hollowing out the intended function, value, or obligation.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Formal compliance appears to preserve substance while actually eroding its intended substantive role.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P050-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Formalization can preserve and clarify substance; it does not require hollow compliance.", "slug": "formalization"}], "residual_id": "r:form_content_congruence_design:b029_a06_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b029_a06_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Formal compliance appears to preserve substance while actually hollowing out the intended function, value, or obligation. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Formal compliance appears to preserve substance while actually hollowing out the intended function, value, or obligation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Breakage found before any formal check is a counterexample to the bare DSA, while an actual passing check removes precisely that case.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Responsive-Layout Breakage", "one_liner": "Diagnose the silent UI failure where an interface's content survives a viewport, device, or locale transformation but its layout-encoded meaning — priority, adjacency, hierarchy, above-the-fold prominence — is lost, so a passing content-accessibility check actively conceals the defect.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:responsive_layout_breakage", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1", "O2"], "guard_type": "MODALITY_ACTUALIZATION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "responsive_interface_formally_passes_content_conformance", "predicate": "The preserved-content interface has passed a formal content-accessibility or QA conformance check.", "rationale": "The retained expression survives universal counterexample review and its qualifier, if present, is atomic and candidate-anchored."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "responsive_layout_breakage"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The preserved-content interface has passed a formal content-accessibility or QA conformance check."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "responsive_layout_breakage", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P050-C10-U1", "why_it_fits": "The DSA supplies actual function loss and the appearance-actuality reversal; the anchored actual-conformance guard supplies the otherwise contingent formal-compliance role."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A control whose paperwork and enacted protection agree is outside hazard-control decay and cannot counterexample the mapping.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Hazard-Control Decay", "one_liner": "Track the widening gap between what a safety control's paperwork says it does and what it actually does under hazard, so that a control certified sound by audit can be found silently unprotective before it fails.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:hazard_control_decay", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "hazard_control_decay"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "hazard_control_decay", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P050-C10-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every complete instance retains a formally compliant control artifact while its intended protective function has actually eroded."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Formal compliance preserves appearance while hollowing out intended function, value, or obligation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P050-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a choice about form or carrier rather than content alone.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A form-bearing choice is made or embedded in a work, process, or system.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve attribution of neutrality to the choice.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Relevant actors treat the choice as neutral with respect to interpretation and action.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail strong influence of the choice on interpretation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The choice actually and strongly shapes interpretation.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail strong influence of the choice on action as well as interpretation.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The choice actually and strongly shapes action.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the neutrality-versus-effect contradiction.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The attributed neutrality conflicts with the choice's actual strong effects.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must preserve an aesthetic choice treated as neutral.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The form-bearing choice is aesthetic.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must preserve a procedural choice treated as neutral.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The form-bearing choice is procedural.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must preserve a technical choice treated as neutral.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The form-bearing choice is technical.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Aesthetic, procedural, or technical choices are treated as neutral even though they strongly shape interpretation and action.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A form-bearing choice is treated as neutral despite strongly shaping both interpretation and action.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P050-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Form always inflects reception, but an instance need not include actors who mistakenly treat it as neutral.", "slug": "form_and_content"}], "residual_id": "r:form_content_congruence_design:b029_a06_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b029_a06_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Aesthetic, procedural, or technical choices are treated as neutral even though they strongly shape interpretation and action. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Aesthetic, procedural, or technical choices are treated as neutral even though they strongly shape interpretation and action."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Form always inflects reception, but an instance need not include actors who mistakenly treat it as neutral.", "slug": "form_and_content"}], "normalized_requirement": "Aesthetic, procedural, or technical form is treated as neutral despite shaping interpretation and action.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Aesthetic, procedural, or technical form is treated as neutral despite shaping interpretation and action.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Different audiences infer different meanings because the form emphasizes different parts of the content than the creators intended.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Form gives content legibility, repeatability, constraint, and force, but every form also selects, frames, and transforms the content it carries. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Different audiences infer different meanings because the form emphasizes different parts of the content than the creators intended. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Different audiences infer different meanings because the form emphasizes different parts of the content than the creators intended.", "Form gives content legibility, repeatability, constraint, and force, but every form also selects, frames, and transforms the content it carries."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Different audiences infer different meanings because the form emphasizes different parts of the content than the creators intended."}, {"display_text": "The work must survive translation across media, scale, legal status, or implementation contexts without losing its core substance.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: The work must survive translation across media, scale, legal status, or implementation contexts without losing its core substance. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The work must survive translation across media, scale, legal status, or implementation contexts without losing its core substance."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "The work must survive translation across media, scale, legal status, or implementation contexts without losing its core substance."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 29, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-029", "ledger_sha256": "44a68c156a21a81f938ebbc6a5322602952e71553f758ffe6a5e3a13f6ce7285"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": [{"groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A headline faithful to the body caveats is expressly outside the candidate and cannot counterexample the unit.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Headline-Body Mismatch", "one_liner": "Diagnose a news artefact as carrying two truth-values indexed to consumption depth — the headline claiming more than the body supports because the two surfaces are written by different actors under opposed incentives, so the headline-only majority acquires an unwarranted belief.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:headline_body_mismatch", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "headline_body_mismatch"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "headline_body_mismatch", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P050-C12-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires creator-relative decoupling of headline emphasis from body support and bifurcated audience meanings caused by consumption depth."}], "publication_role": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT_ONLY", "source_residual_occurrence_id": "r:form_content_congruence_design:b029_a06_c6", "unit": {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P050-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve form, content, creator-intent, and audience-interpreter roles.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The roles include a form, its content, the content's creators, and audiences interpreting the formed content.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve cross-audience divergence rather than one unintended interpretation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "At least two audiences infer meanings that differ from one another.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve form-driven allocation of emphasis within content.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The form emphasizes particular parts of the content.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the creator-relative emphasis mismatch.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The form's emphasis differs from the parts or balance the creators intended to emphasize.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail emphasis-mismatch-to-audience-divergence direction.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The emphasis mismatch causes the audiences to infer different meanings.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Different audiences infer different meanings because the form emphasizes different parts of the content than the creators intended.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A form's creator-relative emphasis mismatch causes audience-dependent meanings.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P050-C12-U1"}}]}
{"archetype": {"name": "Formal Derivation System Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:formal_derivation_system_design", "slug": "formal_derivation_system_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A domain needs reliable rule-governed derivation, but its symbols, admissible expressions, starting assumptions, inference moves, and closure boundary are mixed together in prose, convention, code, or expert habit, making conclusions hard to reproduce, audit, or mechanically check.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A domain needs reliable rule-governed derivation, but its symbols, admissible expressions, starting assumptions, inference moves, and closure boundary are mixed together in prose, convention, code, or expert habit, making conclusions hard to reproduce, audit, or mechanically check."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Syntax-interpretation separation and mechanically decidable formation rules are mandatory.", "role_mapping": "Well-formedness -> syntax; truth or fit -> external interpretation.", "slug": "formal_system", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b029_a07_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A reasoning process must distinguish syntactic well-formedness from truth, policy acceptance, or empirical fit. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A reasoning process must distinguish syntactic well-formedness from truth, policy acceptance, or empirical fit."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Formal System", "one_liner": "Symbols, formation rules, axioms, and inference rules closed under mechanical derivation.", "page_ref": "prime:formal_system", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Well-formedness -> syntax; truth or fit -> external interpretation.", "slug": "formal_system", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Syntax-interpretation separation and mechanically decidable formation rules are mandatory."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Reasoning must distinguish syntactic well-formedness from truth, policy acceptance, or empirical fit.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P050-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve plural actors participating in one derivational setting.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "At least two actors derive conclusions within the same underlying derivation setting.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve cross-actor conclusion divergence.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The actors derive conclusions that differ from one another.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve implicit or unspecified symbols rather than another formal component.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The underlying symbols are not explicit.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail implicit-symbol-to-divergent-conclusion direction.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The implicit symbols cause the actors' conclusions to diverge.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve plural actor roles, their distinct conclusion roles, one shared derivation setting, and that setting’s symbol-vocabulary role.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The principal roles are at least two actors, each actor’s derived conclusion, their common derivation setting, and the underlying symbol vocabulary used in that setting.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}], "predicate": "Different actors derive different conclusions because the underlying symbols are not explicit.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Implicit symbols cause different actors to derive different conclusions.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P050-C13-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P050-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve plural actors participating in one derivational setting.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "At least two actors derive conclusions within the same underlying derivation setting.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve cross-actor conclusion divergence.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The actors derive conclusions that differ from one another.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve implicit or unspecified formation rules rather than another formal component.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The underlying formation rules are not explicit.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail implicit-formation-rule-to-divergent-conclusion direction.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The implicit formation rules cause the actors' conclusions to diverge.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve plural actor roles, their distinct conclusion roles, one shared derivation setting, and that setting’s formation-rule role.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The principal roles are at least two actors, each actor’s derived conclusion, their common derivation setting, and the formation rules governing admissible expressions in that setting.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}], "predicate": "Different actors derive different conclusions because the underlying formation rules are not explicit.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Implicit formation rules cause different actors to derive different conclusions.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P050-C13-U2"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P050-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve plural actors participating in one derivational setting.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "At least two actors derive conclusions within the same underlying derivation setting.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve cross-actor conclusion divergence.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The actors derive conclusions that differ from one another.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve implicit or unspecified axioms rather than another formal component.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The underlying axioms are not explicit.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail implicit-axiom-to-divergent-conclusion direction.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The implicit axioms cause the actors' conclusions to diverge.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve plural actor roles, their distinct conclusion roles, one shared derivation setting, and that setting’s axiom role.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The principal roles are at least two actors, each actor’s derived conclusion, their common derivation setting, and the axioms supplying starting assumptions in that setting.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}], "predicate": "Different actors derive different conclusions because the underlying axioms are not explicit.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Implicit axioms cause different actors to derive different conclusions.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P050-C13-U3"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P050-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve plural actors participating in one derivational setting.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "At least two actors derive conclusions within the same underlying derivation setting.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve cross-actor conclusion divergence.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The actors derive conclusions that differ from one another.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve implicit or unspecified inference rules rather than another formal component.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The underlying inference rules are not explicit.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail implicit-inference-rule-to-divergent-conclusion direction.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The implicit inference rules cause the actors' conclusions to diverge.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve plural actor roles, their distinct conclusion roles, one shared derivation setting, and that setting’s inference-rule role.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The principal roles are at least two actors, each actor’s derived conclusion, their common derivation setting, and the inference rules licensing derivation moves in that setting.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}], "predicate": "Different actors derive different conclusions because the underlying inference rules are not explicit.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Implicit inference rules cause different actors to derive different conclusions.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P050-C13-U4"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A formal system makes every component explicit and can yield consistent derivations; the condition is its inverse defect.", "slug": "formal_system"}], "residual_id": "r:formal_derivation_system_design:b029_a07_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b029_a07_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Different actors derive different conclusions because the underlying symbols, formation rules, axioms, or inference rules are not explicit. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Different actors derive different conclusions because the underlying symbols, formation rules, axioms, or inference rules are not explicit."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 4, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 4}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A formal system makes every component explicit and can yield consistent derivations; the condition is its inverse defect.", "slug": "formal_system"}], "normalized_requirement": "Actors derive different conclusions because symbols, formation rules, axioms, or inference rules are implicit.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 4 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Actors derive different conclusions because symbols, formation rules, axioms, or inference rules are implicit.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Derivation closure fixes exactly which strings follow from axioms and rules, while interpretation remains external.", "role_mapping": "Internal result -> theorem in closure; external claim -> interpretation or added axiom.", "slug": "formal_system", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b029_a07_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The system must make clear which results are derivable inside the formalism and which require external interpretation or new axioms. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The system must make clear which results are derivable inside the formalism and which require external interpretation or new axioms."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Formal System", "one_liner": "Symbols, formation rules, axioms, and inference rules closed under mechanical derivation.", "page_ref": "prime:formal_system", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Internal result -> theorem in closure; external claim -> interpretation or added axiom.", "slug": "formal_system", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Derivation closure fixes exactly which strings follow from axioms and rules, while interpretation remains external."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The system distinguishes results derivable inside the formalism from claims requiring interpretation or new axioms.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P050-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a rule-body role and outputs whose rule conformance is at issue.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A body of rules governs or evaluates outputs for conformance.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve ongoing accumulation or successive addition.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The rule body is undergoing cumulative accretion rather than containing only a fixed isolated deviation.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve accumulation of exceptions.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Exceptions are among the items accumulating in the rule body.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve accumulation of shortcuts as well as exceptions.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Shortcuts are among the items accumulating in the rule body.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve accumulation of ad hoc judgments as well as the other two additions.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Ad hoc judgments are among the items accumulating in the rule body.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve reduced determinability of rule conformance caused by the accumulated additions.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The combined accumulation obscures whether outputs conform to the rules.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "A body of rules is accumulating exceptions, shortcuts, and ad hoc judgments that obscure whether outputs are rule-conformant.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Accumulation of exceptions, shortcuts, and ad hoc judgments in a rule body obscures output conformance.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P050-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A formal system's moves are mechanically checkable and need not accumulate judgment-laden exceptions.", "slug": "formal_system"}], "residual_id": "r:formal_derivation_system_design:b029_a07_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b029_a07_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A body of rules is accumulating exceptions, shortcuts, and ad hoc judgments that obscure whether outputs are rule-conformant. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A body of rules is accumulating exceptions, shortcuts, and ad hoc judgments that obscure whether outputs are rule-conformant."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A formal system's moves are mechanically checkable and need not accumulate judgment-laden exceptions.", "slug": "formal_system"}], "normalized_requirement": "Exceptions, shortcuts, and ad hoc judgments obscure whether outputs conform to rules.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Exceptions, shortcuts, and ad hoc judgments obscure whether outputs conform to rules.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A rules engine, proof system, eligibility system, specification language, or formal model needs a stable kernel before automation or verification.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Formal derivation gains reliability by narrowing attention to explicit symbols and rules, but that same narrowing can hide interpretation, choice of axioms, or domain mismatch unless the formal boundary and metatheoretic limits are governed. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: A rules engine, proof system, eligibility system, specification language, or formal model needs a stable kernel before automation or verification. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A rules engine, proof system, eligibility system, specification language, or formal model needs a stable kernel before automation or verification.", "Formal derivation gains reliability by narrowing attention to explicit symbols and rules, but that same narrowing can hide interpretation, choice of axioms, or domain mismatch unless the formal boundary and metatheoretic limits are governed."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "A rules engine, proof system, eligibility system, specification language, or formal model needs a stable kernel before automation or verification."}, {"display_text": "Downstream decisions depend on proof traces, model checks, schema conformance, or derivation reproducibility.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A domain needs reliable rule-governed derivation, but its symbols, admissible expressions, starting assumptions, inference moves, and closure boundary are mixed together in prose, convention, code, or expert habit, making conclusions hard to reproduce, audit, or mechanically check. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Downstream decisions depend on proof traces, model checks, schema conformance, or derivation reproducibility. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Downstream decisions depend on proof traces, model checks, schema conformance, or derivation reproducibility.", "A domain needs reliable rule-governed derivation, but its symbols, admissible expressions, starting assumptions, inference moves, and closure boundary are mixed together in prose, convention, code, or expert habit, making conclusions hard to reproduce, audit, or mechanically check."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Downstream decisions depend on proof traces, model checks, schema conformance, or derivation reproducibility."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 29, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-029", "ledger_sha256": "44a68c156a21a81f938ebbc6a5322602952e71553f758ffe6a5e3a13f6ce7285"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Formative Feedback Loop", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:formative_feedback_loop", "slug": "formative_feedback_loop"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is delayed correction. The learner moves through a sequence while hidden gaps accumulate. By the time the system discovers the gap, the result may already be a grade, a certification failure, a bad customer interaction, a production error, or a final deliverable.\n\nThe deeper tension is that the system needs honest evidence of partial understanding, but learners often hide partial understanding when every signal feels evaluative. A formative loop has to make room for imperfection while still turning that imperfection into concrete improvement.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Progress problems are discovered too late because the system waits until final evaluation, high-stakes performance, or irreversible delivery to reveal gaps that could have been corrected earlier."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact purpose is improving an in-progress learning process rather than judging a finished one.", "role_mapping": "In-progress learning -> formative phase.", "slug": "formative_assessment", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b029_a08_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Learning, onboarding, or skill development is still in progress rather than complete. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Learning, onboarding, or skill development is still in progress rather than complete."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Formative Assessment", "one_liner": "Ongoing feedback.", "page_ref": "prime:formative_assessment", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "In-progress learning -> formative phase.", "slug": "formative_assessment", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact purpose is improving an in-progress learning process rather than judging a finished one."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Learning, onboarding, or skill development remains in progress rather than final.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Instructional flexibility and adjustment in response to elicited evidence are mandatory.", "role_mapping": "Possible adjustment -> instructional flexibility.", "slug": "formative_assessment", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b029_a08_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The learner or support system can still change strategy, pacing, practice, support, or task design. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The learner or support system can still change strategy, pacing, practice, support, or task design."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Formative Assessment", "one_liner": "Ongoing feedback.", "page_ref": "prime:formative_assessment", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Possible adjustment -> instructional flexibility.", "slug": "formative_assessment", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Instructional flexibility and adjustment in response to elicited evidence are mandatory."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The learner or support system can still adjust strategy, pacing, practice, support, or task design.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The practice elicits current understanding and misconceptions specifically to guide subsequent work.", "role_mapping": "Early error -> elicited learning evidence; improvement -> formative use.", "slug": "formative_assessment", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b029_a08_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Early errors or misconceptions are useful evidence rather than unacceptable final failures. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Early errors or misconceptions are useful evidence rather than unacceptable final failures."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Formative Assessment", "one_liner": "Ongoing feedback.", "page_ref": "prime:formative_assessment", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Early error -> elicited learning evidence; improvement -> formative use.", "slug": "formative_assessment", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The practice elicits current understanding and misconceptions specifically to guide subsequent work."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Early errors or misconceptions can serve as evidence for improvement rather than final failure.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Elicitation of interim work or explanations as evidence of current understanding is a defining component.", "role_mapping": "Interim product -> elicited evidence.", "slug": "formative_assessment", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b029_a08_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The domain has observable interim work products, attempts, explanations, or behaviors that can serve as progress signals. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The domain has observable interim work products, attempts, explanations, or behaviors that can serve as progress signals."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Formative Assessment", "one_liner": "Ongoing feedback.", "page_ref": "prime:formative_assessment", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Interim product -> elicited evidence.", "slug": "formative_assessment", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Elicitation of interim work or explanations as evidence of current understanding is a defining component."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Observable interim work, attempts, explanations, or behavior can provide progress evidence.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Final evaluation, production use, certification, or public delivery would be costly if hidden gaps persist.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Progress problems are discovered too late because the system waits until final evaluation, high-stakes performance, or irreversible delivery to reveal gaps that could have been corrected earlier. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Final evaluation, production use, certification, or public delivery would be costly if hidden gaps persist. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Final evaluation, production use, certification, or public delivery would be costly if hidden gaps persist.", "Progress problems are discovered too late because the system waits until final evaluation, high-stakes performance, or irreversible delivery to reveal gaps that could have been corrected earlier."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Final evaluation, production use, certification, or public delivery would be costly if hidden gaps persist."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 29, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-029", "ledger_sha256": "44a68c156a21a81f938ebbc6a5322602952e71553f758ffe6a5e3a13f6ce7285"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Founder Effect and Legacy Management", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:founder_effect_and_legacy_management", "slug": "founder_effect_and_legacy_management"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 4, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 4 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 1 of 4 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is that founder-originated choices keep shaping the system after the founder’s context has expired. Early decisions become defaults. Defaults become culture. Culture becomes identity. Identity becomes a political constraint on change.\n\nThe founder’s influence may be explicit, as in a family owner or retired founder who still gives advice. It may be symbolic, as in slogans, rituals, origin myths, architecture, product principles, or community norms. It may be hidden in inherited workflows, hiring filters, technical standards, or assumptions about customers and users.\n\nThe system needs continuity, but it also needs adaptation. Without a deliberate pattern, it tends to fall into one of two errors: freezing the founder’s preferences as sacred law, or rejecting the legacy so abruptly that stakeholders experience necessary adaptation as betrayal.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "An institution, community, product, or family enterprise remains shaped by a founder’s early decisions, values, relationships, symbols, and unresolved constraints after the founder is absent, less active, or no longer contextually reliable; the system must decide which influences to preserve, reinterpret, or retire without losing legitimacy or coherence."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P051-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a current decision whose justification reaches back to an origin context.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The focal decision is being made in the present, after the relevant founding context.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve invocation of the origin-linked basis as present justification, not merely historical influence.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The selected origin-linked basis is invoked as a reason or authority that justifies the present decision.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must preserve the founder as the invoked justificatory basis.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The invoked basis is the founder.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must preserve the founding team as the invoked justificatory basis.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The invoked basis is the founding team.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must preserve an origin event as the invoked justificatory precedent.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The invoked basis is an origin event.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must preserve an early doctrine as the invoked justificatory principle.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The invoked basis is an early doctrine.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A founder, founding team, origin event, or early doctrine is still invoked to justify a present decision.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A present decision is justified by invoking a founder, founding team, origin event, or early doctrine.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P051-C01-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The population founder effect persists through copying and closure without anyone invoking founders as justification.", "slug": "founder_effect"}], "residual_id": "r:founder_effect_and_legacy_management:b029_a09_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b029_a09_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A founder, founding team, origin event, or early doctrine is still invoked to justify present decisions. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A founder, founding team, origin event, or early doctrine is still invoked to justify present decisions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "An origin-based verdict invoking a birthplace, manufacturing source, or non-founder author is a complete genetic-fallacy instance but fails the founder branch; the guard excludes exactly those origin-source types.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Genetic Fallacy", "one_liner": "Judge a claim, practice, object, or idea by source or origin information as though it settled present truth, validity, or merit, replacing the evaluation that is owed with an origin story not independently connected to the relevant criterion.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:genetic_fallacy", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O3"], "guard_type": "TYPE_SUBSUMPTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "invoked_origin_source_is_organization_founder", "predicate": "the invoked origin source is the organization founder", "rationale": "Exact-record counterexample testing found no complete candidate instance, with the emitted qualifier if any, that falsifies the selected DNF branch."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "genetic_fallacy"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "invoked_origin_source_is_organization_founder"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "genetic_fallacy", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P051-C01-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact fallacy requires an origin account to occupy the warrant position in a present evaluative verdict. One atomic role-type restriction to the organization founder selects a complete founder branch without adding the timing or justificatory relation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A founder, founding team, origin event, or doctrine is invoked to justify present decisions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A founder-effect population has no necessary leadership succession or vision dispute.", "slug": "founder_effect"}], "residual_id": "r:founder_effect_and_legacy_management:b029_a09_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b029_a09_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Leadership succession is occurring and people disagree about whether change betrays the founding vision. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Leadership succession is occurring and people disagree about whether change betrays the founding vision."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A founder-effect population has no necessary leadership succession or vision dispute.", "slug": "founder_effect"}], "normalized_requirement": "Leadership succession triggers disagreement over fidelity to the founding vision.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Leadership succession triggers disagreement over fidelity to the founding vision.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P051-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an explicit human founder or human founding-team agent, the choices made by that agent, and the organization subject to those choices.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A human founder or human founding team made the focal choices for the organization in its founding context.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the earlier beneficial focusing effect, not merely an old constraint.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Those founding choices earlier created organizational focus.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the present direction from legacy choices to impaired adaptation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The same choices now constrain the organization's adaptation to new conditions.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the temporal contrast in effects for the same founding choices.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The effect of the choices has shifted from creating focus earlier to constraining adaptation now.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve adaptation to new organizational conditions rather than unrelated change.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The required adaptation concerns changed external or normative conditions such as markets, audiences, technologies, regulations, or ethical expectations.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Choices made by a human founder or human founding team that once created focus now constrain the organization's adaptation to new conditions.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "The same choices made by a human founder or human founding team that earlier focused an organization now constrain its adaptation to changed conditions.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P051-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact prime concerns an unrepresentative founding population and conservative propagation, not a human founder's strategic choices.", "slug": "founder_effect"}], "residual_id": "r:founder_effect_and_legacy_management:b029_a09_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b029_a09_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Founding choices that once created focus now constrain adaptation to new markets, audiences, technologies, regulations, or ethical expectations. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Founding choices that once created focus now constrain adaptation to new markets, audiences, technologies, regulations, or ethical expectations."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact prime concerns an unrepresentative founding population and conservative propagation, not a human founder's strategic choices.", "slug": "founder_effect"}], "normalized_requirement": "Human founding choices that once focused an organization now constrain adaptation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Human founding choices that once focused an organization now constrain adaptation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P051-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve founder-to-founded-organization roles.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A founder and the organization the founder helped originate are the principal roles.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve continuing informal influence, not merely historical importance or possible influence.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The founder continues to have actual informal influence in the present.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve relationships as the channel maintaining the founder's influence.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The founder's relationships sustain that informal influence.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "A founder remains informally influential through relationships.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A founder's relationships sustain the founder's informal influence over the organization.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P051-C04-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P051-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve founder-to-founded-organization roles.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A founder and the organization the founder helped originate are the principal roles.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve continuing informal influence, not merely historical importance or possible influence.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The founder continues to have actual informal influence in the present.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve symbolic authority as the channel maintaining the founder's influence.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The founder's symbolic authority sustains that informal influence.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "A founder remains informally influential through symbolic authority.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A founder's symbolic authority sustains the founder's informal influence over the organization.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P051-C04-U2"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P051-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve founder-to-founded-organization roles.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A founder and the organization the founder helped originate are the principal roles.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve continuing informal influence, not merely historical importance or possible influence.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The founder continues to have actual informal influence in the present.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve anticipated founder veto as the channel maintaining influence, not require an exercised formal veto.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Organizational actors expect that the founder can veto or block action, and that expectation sustains the influence.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "A founder remains informally influential through veto expectations.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Expectations that a founder can veto action sustain the founder's informal influence over the organization.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P051-C04-U3"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P051-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve founder-to-founded-organization roles.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A founder and the organization the founder helped originate are the principal roles.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve continuing informal influence, not merely historical importance or possible influence.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The founder continues to have actual informal influence in the present.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve public reputation as the channel maintaining the founder's influence.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The founder's public reputation sustains that informal influence.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "A founder remains informally influential through public reputation.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A founder's public reputation sustains the founder's informal influence over the organization.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P051-C04-U4"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P051-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve founder-to-founded-organization roles.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A founder and the organization the founder helped originate are the principal roles.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve continuing informal influence, not merely historical importance or possible influence.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The founder continues to have actual informal influence in the present.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve unresolved ownership control as the channel maintaining the founder's influence.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The founder's unresolved ownership control sustains that informal influence.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "A founder remains informally influential through unresolved ownership control.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A founder's unresolved ownership control sustains the founder's informal influence over the organization.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P051-C04-U5"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The population-sampling prime requires no person, informal authority, ownership, or veto.", "slug": "founder_effect"}], "residual_id": "r:founder_effect_and_legacy_management:b029_a09_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b029_a09_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The founder remains informally influential through relationships, symbolic authority, veto expectations, public reputation, or unresolved ownership control. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The founder remains informally influential through relationships, symbolic authority, veto expectations, public reputation, or unresolved ownership control."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 5, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 5}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The population-sampling prime requires no person, informal authority, ownership, or veto.", "slug": "founder_effect"}], "normalized_requirement": "A founder retains informal influence through relationships, symbolic authority, veto expectations, reputation, or ownership.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 5 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A founder retains informal influence through relationships, symbolic authority, veto expectations, reputation, or ownership.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "New stakeholders need continuity with institutional memory but cannot depend on tacit founder knowledge.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Without a deliberate pattern, it tends to fall into one of two errors: freezing the founder’s preferences as sacred law, or rejecting the legacy so abruptly that stakeholders experience necessary adaptation as betrayal. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: New stakeholders need continuity with institutional memory but cannot depend on tacit founder knowledge. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["New stakeholders need continuity with institutional memory but cannot depend on tacit founder knowledge.", "Without a deliberate pattern, it tends to fall into one of two errors: freezing the founder’s preferences as sacred law, or rejecting the legacy so abruptly that stakeholders experience necessary adaptation as betrayal."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "New stakeholders need continuity with institutional memory but cannot depend on tacit founder knowledge."}, {"display_text": "The organization is considering major strategy, culture, product, or governance changes that may collide with origin identity.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Identity becomes a political constraint on change. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The organization is considering major strategy, culture, product, or governance changes that may collide with origin identity. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The organization is considering major strategy, culture, product, or governance changes that may collide with origin identity.", "Identity becomes a political constraint on change."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The organization is considering major strategy, culture, product, or governance changes that may collide with origin identity."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 29, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-029", "ledger_sha256": "44a68c156a21a81f938ebbc6a5322602952e71553f758ffe6a5e3a13f6ce7285"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Founding Population Composition and Drift Management", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:founding_population_composition_and_drift_management", "slug": "founding_population_composition_and_drift_management"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is concentrated origin contribution. The founding gate admits only a subset of plausible sources, and the admitted subset contributes unequally to the future population. The causes can be random scarcity, geographic isolation, emergency timing, access cost, network referral, compatibility rules, procurement convenience, survival selection, or deliberate exclusion. The effect is magnified when descendants preferentially reproduce, recruit, copy, or interoperate with lineages already present.\n\nThe danger is not limited to lack of diversity. A narrow founder set can produce correlated failure modes, missing capabilities, distorted norms, biased search spaces, fragile immunity, supplier dependence, epistemic blind spots, or legitimacy deficits. Conversely, the founder set may also contain valuable local adaptation, shared purpose, interoperability, or trust. Management therefore requires a target or viability reference and a theory of which differences matter; maximum heterogeneity is not a sufficient rule.\n\nThree time scales matter. At foundation, gate and seed choices dominate. During early growth, contribution inequality and feedback determine which founder traits amplify. In maturity, drift, attrition, continued gate bias, and selective refresh govern whether the population remains locked to its origin. An intervention that is effective at one stage may be unavailable or damaging at another.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A descendant population, institution, dataset, ecosystem, or replicated technical family is initialized by a small or filtered founding subset. Because early members have unusually high reproductive, recruitment, copying, or standard-setting weight, random or gate-induced composition differences become durable population properties. Later leaders may misread those inherited properties as natural, intentional, universal, or optimal rather than contingent consequences of the founding event."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P051-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve that the new collective will begin from the source set, not only describe an established population.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The founding or initialization of the focal collective is prospective.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve both the materially-fewer comparison and the intended long-run population as its baseline.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The founding source set is materially smaller in count than the intended long-run population of the focal collective.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the direction from founding sources to the collective they begin.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The smaller source set initializes the new focal collective.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must preserve a new population initialized by the smaller source set.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The new focal collective is a population.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must preserve a new lineage initialized by the smaller source set.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The new focal collective is a lineage.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A new population or lineage will begin from materially fewer sources than its intended long-run population.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A prospective population or lineage is initialized by a source set materially smaller than its intended long-run population.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P051-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A founder draw is small relative to its parent distribution, but a natural lineage need not have an intended long-run population.", "slug": "founder_effect"}], "residual_id": "r:founding_population_composition_and_drift_management:b029_a10_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b029_a10_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A new population or lineage will begin from materially fewer sources than the intended long-run population. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A new population or lineage will begin from materially fewer sources than the intended long-run population."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A founder draw is small relative to its parent distribution, but a natural lineage need not have an intended long-run population.", "slug": "founder_effect"}], "normalized_requirement": "A new population or lineage begins from materially fewer sources than the intended long-run population.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A new population or lineage begins from materially fewer sources than the intended long-run population.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The sampling bottleneck is exactly a narrow gate selecting the founding subset.", "role_mapping": "Admission or copying gate -> founder sampling bottleneck.", "slug": "founder_effect", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b029_a10_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Strong cases combine a narrow gate, a small or correlated seed, a reproduction or copying channel, and costly later correction. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Admission, migration, procurement, recruitment, copying, or survival creates a narrow founding gate.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Admission, migration, procurement, recruitment, copying, or survival creates a narrow founding gate.", "Strong cases combine a narrow gate, a small or correlated seed, a reproduction or copying channel, and costly later correction."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Founder Effect", "one_liner": "A small unrepresentative initial subset starts a new population through a narrow gate, and its idiosyncratic composition is amplified into the descendant's durable identity.", "page_ref": "prime:founder_effect", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Admission or copying gate -> founder sampling bottleneck.", "slug": "founder_effect", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The sampling bottleneck is exactly a narrow gate selecting the founding subset."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Admission, migration, procurement, recruitment, copying, or survival creates a narrow founding gate.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Closure plus conservative propagation amplifies the initial draw into the descendant population.", "role_mapping": "Early members -> founder set; disproportionate contribution -> conservative propagation.", "slug": "founder_effect", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b029_a10_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use it when early members, sources, or templates have disproportionate descendant weight and when the resulting population matters beyond the launch. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Early members contribute disproportionately to descendants, norms, templates, data, or infrastructure.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Early members contribute disproportionately to descendants, norms, templates, data, or infrastructure.", "Use it when early members, sources, or templates have disproportionate descendant weight and when the resulting population matters beyond the launch."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Founder Effect", "one_liner": "A small unrepresentative initial subset starts a new population through a narrow gate, and its idiosyncratic composition is amplified into the descendant's durable identity.", "page_ref": "prime:founder_effect", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Early members -> founder set; disproportionate contribution -> conservative propagation.", "slug": "founder_effect", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Closure plus conservative propagation amplifies the initial draw into the descendant population."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Early members contribute disproportionately to descendants, norms, templates, data, or infrastructure.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Durable amplification makes the founder draw a lasting predictor of descendant identity.", "role_mapping": "Origin cohort -> founder draw; current composition -> amplified identity.", "slug": "founder_effect", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b029_a10_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The system is already established but observed lineage composition remains strongly predicted by its origin cohort. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The system is already established but observed lineage composition remains strongly predicted by its origin cohort."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Founder Effect", "one_liner": "A small unrepresentative initial subset starts a new population through a narrow gate, and its idiosyncratic composition is amplified into the descendant's durable identity.", "page_ref": "prime:founder_effect", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Origin cohort -> founder draw; current composition -> amplified identity.", "slug": "founder_effect", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Durable amplification makes the founder draw a lasting predictor of descendant identity."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Established descendant composition remains strongly predicted by the origin cohort.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The intended future population has meaningful dimensions of diversity, representation, viability, or robustness.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The founding gate admits only a subset of plausible sources, and the admitted subset contributes unequally to the future population. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: The intended future population has meaningful dimensions of diversity, representation, viability, or robustness. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The intended future population has meaningful dimensions of diversity, representation, viability, or robustness.", "The founding gate admits only a subset of plausible sources, and the admitted subset contributes unequally to the future population."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The intended future population has meaningful dimensions of diversity, representation, viability, or robustness."}, {"display_text": "Refresh after foundation will be costly, slow, politically difficult, genetically risky, or technically incompatible.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Refresh after foundation will be costly, slow, politically difficult, genetically risky, or technically incompatible. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Refresh after foundation will be costly, slow, politically difficult, genetically risky, or technically incompatible."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Refresh after foundation will be costly, slow, politically difficult, genetically risky, or technically incompatible."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 29, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-029", "ledger_sha256": "44a68c156a21a81f938ebbc6a5322602952e71553f758ffe6a5e3a13f6ce7285"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Fourier Transform Uncertainty Principle", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:fourier_transform_uncertainty_principle", "slug": "fourier_transform_uncertainty_principle"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 4 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A decision, measurement, model, or design requires information from two transform-linked descriptions, but actors treat the precision of those descriptions as independently improvable. The result is an impossible requirement: a signal, state, event, or object is expected to be sharply localized in one representation while also being sharply localized in its conjugate representation.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A decision, measurement, model, or design requires information from two transform-linked descriptions, but actors treat the precision of those descriptions as independently improvable. The result is an impossible requirement: a signal, state, event, or object is expected to be sharply localized in one representation while also being sharply localized in its conjugate representation."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Fourier-conjugate or canonical variable pairs and their uncertainty product are defining components.", "role_mapping": "Transform-linked descriptions -> conjugate variables.", "slug": "conjugate_variables", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The exact specialization requires two inverse-resolution observables carried by one system.", "role_mapping": "Linked pair -> conjugate observables; shared system -> common carrier.", "slug": "conjugate_observable_complementarity", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b029_a11_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The system has a meaningful pair of conjugate or transform-linked descriptions, such as time/frequency, space/spatial-frequency, position/momentum, or window length/bandwidth. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The system has a meaningful pair of conjugate or transform-linked descriptions, such as time/frequency, space/spatial-frequency, position/momentum, or window length/bandwidth."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Conjugate Variables", "one_liner": "Interlinked variable pairs.", "page_ref": "prime:conjugate_variables", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Transform-linked descriptions -> conjugate variables.", "slug": "conjugate_variables", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Fourier-conjugate or canonical variable pairs and their uncertainty product are defining components."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Conjugate-Observable Complementarity", "one_liner": "Certain observable pairs cannot be jointly specified to arbitrary precision because sharpening one structurally blurs its conjugate — a built-in trade-off of the system, not a measurement limitation.", "page_ref": "prime:conjugate_observable_complementarity", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Linked pair -> conjugate observables; shared system -> common carrier.", "slug": "conjugate_observable_complementarity", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact specialization requires two inverse-resolution observables carried by one system."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "One system has a meaningful conjugate or transform-linked pair such as time-frequency or position-momentum.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P051-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve stakeholders as the actors making the resolution demand.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Stakeholders make a resolution request of a measurement, model, algorithm, or design.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve coupling between the two resolution domains rather than two unrelated dimensions.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The two focal domains form a coupled conjugate or transform-linked pair.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve increased resolution in both domains, not improvement in only one.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The stakeholders request higher resolution in both members of the domain pair.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the absence of acknowledgment of the resolution coupling.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The request does not acknowledge the coupling between the two resolutions.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Stakeholders request higher resolution in both conjugate domains without acknowledging their coupling.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Stakeholders seek increased resolution in both members of a coupled conjugate-domain pair while treating the coupling as unacknowledged.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P051-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The intrinsic precision-product floor exists whether or not anyone makes an impossible request.", "slug": "conjugate_observable_complementarity"}], "residual_id": "r:fourier_transform_uncertainty_principle:b029_a11_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b029_a11_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Stakeholders ask for higher resolution in both domains without acknowledging the coupling between those resolutions. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders ask for higher resolution in both domains without acknowledging the coupling between those resolutions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The intrinsic precision-product floor exists whether or not anyone makes an impossible request.", "slug": "conjugate_observable_complementarity"}], "normalized_requirement": "Stakeholders request sharper resolution in both conjugate domains without acknowledging their coupling.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Stakeholders request sharper resolution in both conjugate domains without acknowledging their coupling.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P051-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a short observation window used for spectral estimation.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A spectral estimate is formed using an observation window that is short in the relevant time domain.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the directed causal effect from window shortness to spectral smearing.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The short observation window causes the spectral estimate to be smeared.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Short observation windows produce smeared spectral estimates.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A short observation window causes the resulting spectral estimate to be smeared.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P051-C10-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P051-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a narrow-band filter as the source of the focal response.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A response is produced through a narrow-band filter.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the direction from narrow-band filtering to the response's temporal effect.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The narrow-band filtering causes the selected temporal effect in the response.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For the delay branch, a candidate must preserve filter-induced response delay.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The response is delayed.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For the spread branch, a candidate must preserve filter-induced temporal spreading of the response.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The response is temporally spread.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Narrow-band filters produce delayed or temporally spread responses.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A narrow-band filter causes its response to be delayed or spread in time.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P051-C10-U2"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime also covers position-momentum and other pairs without windows or narrow-band filters.", "slug": "conjugate_observable_complementarity"}], "residual_id": "r:fourier_transform_uncertainty_principle:b029_a11_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b029_a11_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Short observation windows produce smeared spectral estimates, or narrow-band filters produce delayed or temporally spread responses. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Short observation windows produce smeared spectral estimates, or narrow-band filters produce delayed or temporally spread responses."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PARTIALLY_DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A broad-band LTI filter can have a compact impulse response, so the unguarded candidate does not entail the source. Once the existing filter is restricted to narrow band, a compact temporal response would violate the exact uncertainty bound.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Fourier Transform", "one_liner": "Decompose a function into a weighted superposition of complex exponentials, recording each frequency's amplitude and phase — an invertible, energy-preserving change of basis that diagonalizes every translation-invariant operation, so convolution becomes pointwise multiplication.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:fourier_transform", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "THRESHOLD_CROSSING", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "lti_filter_frequency_response_is_narrow_band", "predicate": "The focal linear time-invariant filter has a narrow-band frequency response.", "rationale": "Exact-record counterexample testing found no complete candidate instance, with the emitted qualifier if any, that falsifies the selected DNF branch."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "fourier_transform"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "lti_filter_frequency_response_is_narrow_band"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "fourier_transform", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P051-C10-U2", "why_it_fits": "Fourier analysis directly fixes both LTI filtering and the inverse bandwidth-localization relation. One threshold restriction on the already-present filter selects a narrow-band frequency response, which necessarily makes its impulse response temporally spread and satisfies the spread branch."}], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 2, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 1, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime also covers position-momentum and other pairs without windows or narrow-band filters.", "slug": "conjugate_observable_complementarity"}], "normalized_requirement": "Short windows smear spectra or narrow-band filters spread responses in time.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "PARTIAL_EXISTING_DSA_GROUNDING", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation grounded 1 of 2 eligible atomic units; the remaining unit or units stayed open."}, "predicate": "Short windows smear spectra or narrow-band filters spread responses in time.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P051-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a representation-imposed limit belonging to the focal reporter.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The reporter uses a chosen representation with a precision or sharpness support limit.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve reporting of sharp values rather than internal uncertainty alone.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The reporter outputs values with claimed sharpness or precision.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve reported precision above, not within, the representation's support limit.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The reported sharpness exceeds what the chosen representation can support.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must preserve a model as the reporter.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The reporter is a model.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must preserve an instrument as the reporter.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The reporter is an instrument.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A model or instrument reports values sharper than its chosen representation supports.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A model or instrument reports precision that exceeds the support limit of its chosen representation.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P051-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Measurement uncertainty can be honestly reported within instrument limits and need not violate a conjugate bound.", "slug": "measurement_uncertainty"}], "residual_id": "r:fourier_transform_uncertainty_principle:b029_a11_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b029_a11_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A model or instrument reports sharp values that exceed what the chosen representation can support. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A model or instrument reports sharp values that exceed what the chosen representation can support."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Measurement uncertainty can be honestly reported within instrument limits and need not violate a conjugate bound.", "slug": "measurement_uncertainty"}], "normalized_requirement": "A model or instrument reports values sharper than its representation supports.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A model or instrument reports values sharper than its representation supports.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Analysts need both local event placement and spectral or momentum composition.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: Analysts need both local event placement and spectral or momentum composition. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Analysts need both local event placement and spectral or momentum composition."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "Analysts need both local event placement and spectral or momentum composition."}, {"display_text": "A measurement or algorithm uses a window, aperture, basis transform, filter bank, bin width, packet, or basis expansion.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A decision, measurement, model, or design requires information from two transform-linked descriptions, but actors treat the precision of those descriptions as independently improvable. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: A measurement or algorithm uses a window, aperture, basis transform, filter bank, bin width, packet, or basis expansion. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A measurement or algorithm uses a window, aperture, basis transform, filter bank, bin width, packet, or basis expansion.", "A decision, measurement, model, or design requires information from two transform-linked descriptions, but actors treat the precision of those descriptions as independently improvable."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "A measurement or algorithm uses a window, aperture, basis transform, filter bank, bin width, packet, or basis expansion."}, {"display_text": "Design choices depend on latency, bandwidth, detection specificity, spatial resolution, or spectral discrimination.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Design choices depend on latency, bandwidth, detection specificity, spatial resolution, or spectral discrimination. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Design choices depend on latency, bandwidth, detection specificity, spatial resolution, or spectral discrimination."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "Design choices depend on latency, bandwidth, detection specificity, spatial resolution, or spectral discrimination."}, {"display_text": "The cost of false precision is high because it changes diagnosis, design tolerances, event attribution, or physical interpretation.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A decision, measurement, model, or design requires information from two transform-linked descriptions, but actors treat the precision of those descriptions as independently improvable. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The cost of false precision is high because it changes diagnosis, design tolerances, event attribution, or physical interpretation. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The cost of false precision is high because it changes diagnosis, design tolerances, event attribution, or physical interpretation.", "A decision, measurement, model, or design requires information from two transform-linked descriptions, but actors treat the precision of those descriptions as independently improvable."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 8, "text": "The cost of false precision is high because it changes diagnosis, design tolerances, event attribution, or physical interpretation."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 29, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-029", "ledger_sha256": "44a68c156a21a81f938ebbc6a5322602952e71553f758ffe6a5e3a13f6ce7285"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": [{"groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "An isolated oscillating function with no dilation-translation basis would not qualify as the exact wavelet role. Every complete record instance includes the generated basis and the signal-decomposition operation, so the abstract-template objection does not defeat the basis-transform branch.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Wavelet", "one_liner": "A localized, oscillating template function whose scaled and translated copies form a basis that resolves a signal simultaneously in position and scale, producing a sparse two-dimensional coefficient plane where features localize in both axes at once — the precondition being a sampled signal with scale-localized, transient structure.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:wavelet", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "wavelet"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "wavelet", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P051-C08-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record necessarily includes a transform that decomposes a sampled signal against the scaled-and-translated wavelet basis. That directly satisfies an algorithm-uses-basis-transform branch; the DWT filter-bank implementation is corroborating but is not needed as the universal branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A mere mention of frequencies would not establish basis-transform use, but it is not a complete Fourier-transform instance. The exact operator necessarily decomposes the input in the exponential basis and has an explicit FFT realization.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Fourier Transform", "one_liner": "Decompose a function into a weighted superposition of complex exponentials, recording each frequency's amplitude and phase — an invertible, energy-preserving change of basis that diagonalizes every translation-invariant operation, so convolution becomes pointwise multiplication.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:fourier_transform", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "fourier_transform"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "fourier_transform", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P051-C08-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact identity is itself an algorithmically realizable change-of-basis decomposition, with the FFT as its explicit computational realization. Thus the algorithm and actual basis-transform use are necessary, satisfying one complete DNF branch without a qualifier."}], "publication_role": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT_ONLY", "source_residual_occurrence_id": "r:fourier_transform_uncertainty_principle:b029_a11_c3", "unit": {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P051-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O9"], ["O1", "O2", "O10"], ["O1", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O3", "O7"], ["O1", "O3", "O8"], ["O1", "O3", "O9"], ["O1", "O3", "O10"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve actual use by the focal measurement or algorithm, not mere availability of the apparatus.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The focal measurement or algorithm uses the selected apparatus or representation form.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For a measurement branch, a candidate must preserve a measurement as the apparatus user.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The user role is a measurement.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For an algorithm branch, a candidate must preserve an algorithm as the apparatus user.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The user role is an algorithm.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For a window branch, a candidate must preserve use of a window.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The selected apparatus is a window.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For an aperture branch, a candidate must preserve use of an aperture.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The selected apparatus is an aperture.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For a transform branch, a candidate must preserve use of a basis transform.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The selected apparatus is a basis transform.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For a filter-bank branch, a candidate must preserve use of a filter bank.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The selected apparatus is a filter bank.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For a bin-width branch, a candidate must preserve use of a bin width.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The selected apparatus is a bin width.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For a packet branch, a candidate must preserve use of a packet.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "The selected apparatus is a packet.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For a basis-expansion branch, a candidate must preserve use of a basis expansion.", "obligation_id": "O10", "statement": "The selected apparatus is a basis expansion.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A measurement or algorithm uses a window, aperture, basis transform, filter bank, bin width, packet, or basis expansion.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A measurement or algorithm uses a window, aperture, basis transform, filter bank, bin width, packet, or basis expansion.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P051-C08-U1"}}]}
{"archetype": {"name": "Fragmented Rights Clearance Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:fragmented_rights_clearance_design", "slug": "fragmented_rights_clearance_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 6, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 6, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "6 of 7 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 7}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A resource is systematically under-used because exclusion, consent, veto, approval, or ownership rights are split among too many independent parties. Each party may act rationally, but the combined transaction cost, uncertainty, strategic holdout risk, and coordination burden prevent a collectively valuable use from happening.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A resource is systematically under-used because exclusion, consent, veto, approval, or ownership rights are split among too many independent parties. Each party may act rationally, but the combined transaction cost, uncertainty, strategic holdout risk, and coordination burden prevent a collectively valuable use from happening."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact pattern requires a foregone Pareto-improving use of a complementary resource.", "role_mapping": "Valuable use -> foregone joint allocation.", "slug": "anti_commons_tragedy", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b029_a12_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The resource or opportunity has positive expected value if put to use, reused, combined, shared, accessed, or developed. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The resource or opportunity has positive expected value if put to use, reused, combined, shared, accessed, or developed."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Anti-Commons Tragedy", "one_liner": "A resource is systematically under-used because too many independent agents each hold a right to exclude and assembling their consents is too costly, so the resource sits idle even though every party would benefit from putting it to use — the formal dual of the commons.", "page_ref": "prime:anti_commons_tragedy", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Valuable use -> foregone joint allocation.", "slug": "anti_commons_tragedy", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact pattern requires a foregone Pareto-improving use of a complementary resource."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A resource has positive expected value if put to joint use, reuse, combination, sharing, access, or development.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Fragmented exclusion rights make each non-substitutable holder a veto and require unanimous assembly.", "role_mapping": "Many blockers -> independent exclusion-right holders.", "slug": "anti_commons_tragedy", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b029_a12_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: No single actor has enough authority to authorize the use, yet many actors can block or delay it. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["No single actor has enough authority to authorize the use, yet many actors can block or delay it."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Anti-Commons Tragedy", "one_liner": "A resource is systematically under-used because too many independent agents each hold a right to exclude and assembling their consents is too costly, so the resource sits idle even though every party would benefit from putting it to use — the formal dual of the commons.", "page_ref": "prime:anti_commons_tragedy", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Many blockers -> independent exclusion-right holders.", "slug": "anti_commons_tragedy", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Fragmented exclusion rights make each non-substitutable holder a veto and require unanimous assembly."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "No single actor can authorize use while many independent actors can block it.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Holdout and bargaining costs rise super-linearly with fragmentation until consent assembly fails.", "role_mapping": "Clearance burden -> super-linear assembly cost.", "slug": "anti_commons_tragedy", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b029_a12_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The cost of finding, negotiating with, compensating, documenting, and assuring every right-holder approaches or exceeds the value of the use. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The cost of finding, negotiating with, compensating, documenting, and assuring every right-holder approaches or exceeds the value of the use."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Anti-Commons Tragedy", "one_liner": "A resource is systematically under-used because too many independent agents each hold a right to exclude and assembling their consents is too costly, so the resource sits idle even though every party would benefit from putting it to use — the formal dual of the commons.", "page_ref": "prime:anti_commons_tragedy", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Clearance burden -> super-linear assembly cost.", "slug": "anti_commons_tragedy", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Holdout and bargaining costs rise super-linearly with fragmentation until consent assembly fails."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Finding, negotiating, compensating, documenting, and assuring all right-holders approaches or exceeds use value.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact configuration distributes non-substitutable veto rights over one complementary resource among independent holders.", "role_mapping": "Overlapping rights -> fragmented exclusion; holders -> independent veto parties.", "slug": "anti_commons_tragedy", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b029_a12_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Overlapping rights are unclear, duplicated, inconsistent, or distributed across legal, technical, organizational, or social boundaries. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Overlapping rights are unclear, duplicated, inconsistent, or distributed across legal, technical, organizational, or social boundaries."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Anti-Commons Tragedy", "one_liner": "A resource is systematically under-used because too many independent agents each hold a right to exclude and assembling their consents is too costly, so the resource sits idle even though every party would benefit from putting it to use — the formal dual of the commons.", "page_ref": "prime:anti_commons_tragedy", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Overlapping rights -> fragmented exclusion; holders -> independent veto parties.", "slug": "anti_commons_tragedy", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact configuration distributes non-substitutable veto rights over one complementary resource among independent holders."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Overlapping exclusion rights are distributed across independent legal, technical, organizational, or social holders.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact foregone allocation is Pareto-improving, yet fragmented consent cannot reach it.", "role_mapping": "Aggregate benefit -> Pareto improvement; failed terms -> broken assembly.", "slug": "anti_commons_tragedy", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b029_a12_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Rights holders would benefit in aggregate from use but cannot coordinate terms, trust one another, or distribute benefits. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Rights holders would benefit in aggregate from use but cannot coordinate terms, trust one another, or distribute benefits."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Anti-Commons Tragedy", "one_liner": "A resource is systematically under-used because too many independent agents each hold a right to exclude and assembling their consents is too costly, so the resource sits idle even though every party would benefit from putting it to use — the formal dual of the commons.", "page_ref": "prime:anti_commons_tragedy", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Aggregate benefit -> Pareto improvement; failed terms -> broken assembly.", "slug": "anti_commons_tragedy", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact foregone allocation is Pareto-improving, yet fragmented consent cannot reach it."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Rights holders would all benefit from use but cannot coordinate terms, trust, or benefit distribution.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Unanimity makes every non-substitutable veto holder pivotal and creates holdout incentives.", "role_mapping": "Pivotal consent -> unanimity gate; holdout -> assembly failure.", "slug": "anti_commons_tragedy", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b029_a12_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Strategic holdout is possible because each consent becomes pivotal once all other consents are assembled. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Strategic holdout is possible because each consent becomes pivotal once all other consents are assembled."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Anti-Commons Tragedy", "one_liner": "A resource is systematically under-used because too many independent agents each hold a right to exclude and assembling their consents is too costly, so the resource sits idle even though every party would benefit from putting it to use — the formal dual of the commons.", "page_ref": "prime:anti_commons_tragedy", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Pivotal consent -> unanimity gate; holdout -> assembly failure.", "slug": "anti_commons_tragedy", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Unanimity makes every non-substitutable veto holder pivotal and creates holdout incentives."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Each consent becomes pivotal after the others are assembled, enabling strategic holdout.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P051-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the same system's earlier protective purpose.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The focal system was originally built for protection.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve completed transformation, not a system that was always adverse or only might become so.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The system has changed from that protective purpose into the selected adverse current state.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must preserve deadlock as the transformed state.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The system's current state is deadlock.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must preserve idle capacity as the transformed state.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The system's current state is idle capacity.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A system built for protection has become a system of deadlock or idle capacity.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A formerly protective system has transitioned into deadlock or idle capacity.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P051-C13-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Fragmented rights can begin as ordinary ownership and need not be a formerly protective system.", "slug": "anti_commons_tragedy"}], "residual_id": "r:fragmented_rights_clearance_design:b029_a12_c8", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b029_a12_c8", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A system built for protection has become a system of deadlock or idle capacity. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A system built for protection has become a system of deadlock or idle capacity."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Fragmented rights can begin as ordinary ownership and need not be a formerly protective system.", "slug": "anti_commons_tragedy"}], "normalized_requirement": "A protection system has become a system of deadlock or idle capacity.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A protection system has become a system of deadlock or idle capacity.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [8], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Potential users abandon projects because permission assembly is too slow, uncertain, or bespoke.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Potential users abandon projects because permission assembly is too slow, uncertain, or bespoke. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Potential users abandon projects because permission assembly is too slow, uncertain, or bespoke."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Potential users abandon projects because permission assembly is too slow, uncertain, or bespoke."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 29, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-029", "ledger_sha256": "44a68c156a21a81f938ebbc6a5322602952e71553f758ffe6a5e3a13f6ce7285"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Frame Shift Intervention", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:frame_shift_intervention", "slug": "frame_shift_intervention"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 5, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 5 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 1 of 5 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is frame lock-in. A current frame organizes evidence, roles, causes, and options so strongly that alternatives become hard to imagine or easy to dismiss. The frame may be partly true, which makes it persuasive, but still incomplete enough to block action.\n\nThe stuckness often appears as repeated failed fixes, circular arguments, blame that never leads to repair, or a problem statement that already smuggles in the answer. The intervention treats this as a representation problem before it treats it as an optimization problem.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Actors are trapped in a frame that defines the problem, constraints, causal story, or roles in a way that blocks solution discovery or misdirects action."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P051-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a group repeatedly acting on the same focal problem.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A group acts on a focal problem using proposed or attempted solutions.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve recurrence of solution attempts.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The group makes repeated attempts rather than a single attempt.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve sameness of the underlying solution across the attempted variants.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The attempted variants remain variants of the same underlying solution rather than different underlying solution families.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve persistence of the same problem rather than successful iteration.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The focal problem remains unresolved despite those repeated attempts.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "A group repeats variants of the same solution while the problem persists.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A group repeatedly tries variants within one solution family without resolving the same problem.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P051-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A well-chosen problem frame can support diverse successful solutions and need not involve persistence.", "slug": "problem_framing"}], "residual_id": "r:frame_shift_intervention:b029_a13_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b029_a13_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A group keeps trying variants of the same solution even though the problem persists. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A group keeps trying variants of the same solution even though the problem persists."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_SYNTHESIS", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A build-trap team can ship unrelated features across many product areas while moving no shared outcome, defeating the direct judgment. The synthesized guard excludes that case and leaves no further gap in the repeated-same-family failure pattern.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Build Trap", "one_liner": "Diagnose a team that ships at high velocity yet moves no business outcome — because its measurement, calendar, and incentives are all set to what was built rather than to whether it mattered — by reading those three dials and asking what outcome the team owns.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:build_trap", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O3"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "repeated_outputs_are_same_solution_family_variants", "predicate": "The repeatedly shipped features are variants within one underlying solution family for the focal unmoved outcome.", "rationale": "Exact-record counterexample testing found no complete candidate instance, with the emitted qualifier if any, that falsifies the selected DNF branch."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "build_trap"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "repeated_outputs_are_same_solution_family_variants"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "build_trap", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P051-C14-U1", "why_it_fits": "Build trap is not direct because its repeated outputs can span unrelated solution families. It does, however, fix the group, recurrence, attempted output, and unmoved focal outcome, so one atomic restriction of the existing output set to same-family variants yields a safe guarded expression."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A single pilot awaiting a scheduled scale decision lacks recurrence, while a sequence that transitions into adoption lacks the persistent problem. Neither is the stable repeated-pilot loop required by the exact candidate.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Pilot Purgatory", "one_liner": "Relocate the diagnosis of an initiative that keeps running successful pilots without ever scaling from 'weak evidence' to 'a missing transition mechanism' — the loop is sustained by each pilot's local success, and the fault sits one level up in the decision infrastructure.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:pilot_purgatory", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "pilot_purgatory"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "pilot_purgatory", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P051-C14-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every complete pilot-purgatory instance repeatedly demonstrates the same intervention or lightly revised variants while the missing transition mechanism leaves scale adoption unresolved. The group, recurrence, same-family comparison, and negative outcome are all necessary."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A group repeats variants of one solution while the problem persists.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Problem framing can explicitly include all task-relevant actors and leverage points.", "slug": "problem_framing"}], "residual_id": "r:frame_shift_intervention:b029_a13_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b029_a13_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The current problem statement assigns cause or responsibility so narrowly that other leverage points disappear. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The current problem statement assigns cause or responsibility so narrowly that other leverage points disappear."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Problem framing can explicitly include all task-relevant actors and leverage points.", "slug": "problem_framing"}], "normalized_requirement": "A narrow problem statement hides causes, responsibilities, or leverage points.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A narrow problem statement hides causes, responsibilities, or leverage points.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P052-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must include disputants whose exchange is organized by a shared dominant debate frame.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Stakeholders engage through a dominant set of debate terms.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The frame must cause the cross-talk or mutual non-engagement, not merely coexist with disagreement.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The dominant debate terms cause the stakeholders to argue past one another.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires alternatives presented as falsely exclusive or falsely exhaustive.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The debate terms constrain the dispute to a false choice.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires omission or exclusion of a stakeholder perspective relevant to the dispute.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The debate terms exclude a perspective relevant to the dispute.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Stakeholders argue past each other because dominant debate terms force a false choice or exclude a relevant perspective.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Dominant debate terms cause stakeholders to argue past one another by forcing a false choice or excluding a relevant perspective.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P052-C01-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Reframing can compare two faithful frames without any false dilemma or excluded stakeholder.", "slug": "reframing"}], "residual_id": "r:frame_shift_intervention:b029_a13_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b029_a13_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Stakeholders argue past each other because the dominant terms of debate force a false choice or exclude a relevant perspective. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders argue past each other because the dominant terms of debate force a false choice or exclude a relevant perspective."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Reframing can compare two faithful frames without any false dilemma or excluded stakeholder.", "slug": "reframing"}], "normalized_requirement": "Dominant debate terms force a false choice or exclude a relevant stakeholder perspective.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Dominant debate terms force a false choice or exclude a relevant stakeholder perspective.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P052-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must distinguish new evidence, an interpreter, and an already-held explanatory belief.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An interpreter receives new evidence while holding an incumbent story or hypothesis.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must require repeated assimilation rather than a single evaluation episode.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The confirmatory interpretation recurs across new evidence.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The evidence must be read as support for the already-held account.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The new evidence is interpreted as confirming the incumbent story.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The relation must preserve the contrast with hypothesis change.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Confirmation occurs instead of revision to a changed hypothesis.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "New evidence is repeatedly interpreted as confirmation of an old story instead of prompting a changed hypothesis.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An interpreter repeatedly assimilates new evidence as confirmation of an incumbent story rather than revising the hypothesis.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P052-C02-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Confirmation bias can occur in one search or evaluation episode and need not repeatedly assimilate new evidence into a narrative frame.", "slug": "confirmation_bias"}], "residual_id": "r:frame_shift_intervention:b029_a13_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b029_a13_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: New evidence is repeatedly interpreted as confirmation of an old story instead of prompting a changed hypothesis. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["New evidence is repeatedly interpreted as confirmation of an old story instead of prompting a changed hypothesis."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Confirmation bias can occur in one search or evaluation episode and need not repeatedly assimilate new evidence into a narrative frame.", "slug": "confirmation_bias"}], "normalized_requirement": "New evidence is repeatedly interpreted to confirm an incumbent belief rather than revise it.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "New evidence is repeatedly interpreted to confirm an incumbent belief rather than revise it.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B5", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P052-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must preserve all three roles and not collapse representation into system.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The relation distinguishes a problem frame, an apparent constraint, and the underlying system.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must preserve 'may' and may not assert a universal or actual frame-origin.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Frame-origin is possible rather than established as actual.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Framing must be the possible source of the constraint's appearance.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Under that possibility, the frame produces the apparent constraint.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must exclude simultaneous attribution of the apparent constraint to the underlying system while preserving frame-origin as possible rather than established.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Under the possible frame-origin attribution, the apparent constraint is not a property of the underlying system.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "An apparent constraint may arise from the chosen problem frame rather than the underlying system.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A problem frame may produce an apparent constraint that is not a property of the underlying system.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P052-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A frame can accurately represent a real physical constraint; frame-dependent constraints are not universal.", "slug": "problem_framing"}], "residual_id": "r:frame_shift_intervention:b029_a13_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b029_a13_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The apparent constraint may be a product of how the problem has been framed rather than a property of the system itself. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The apparent constraint may be a product of how the problem has been framed rather than a property of the system itself."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A frame can accurately represent a real physical constraint; frame-dependent constraints are not universal.", "slug": "problem_framing"}], "normalized_requirement": "An apparent constraint may arise from the chosen problem frame rather than the underlying system.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "An apparent constraint may arise from the chosen problem frame rather than the underlying system.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 5", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "DISJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 29, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-029", "ledger_sha256": "44a68c156a21a81f938ebbc6a5322602952e71553f758ffe6a5e3a13f6ce7285"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Framing Effect Audit", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:framing_effect_audit", "slug": "framing_effect_audit"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 2 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 2}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is that presentation choices can become hidden causal inputs into judgment. A decision maker may believe they are seeing a stable preference, risk estimate, ranking, or evaluation when they are actually seeing the output of a specific frame. Because presentation feels like packaging rather than substance, its effects are often under-documented.\n\nThis creates several risks: a survey can appear to measure public preference when it is partly measuring wording; a dashboard can appear to show priority when it is partly showing baseline choice; an evaluation can appear objective when evidence order or labels shape interpretation; a risk message can appear informative while steering action through gain/loss framing.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A decision, survey, dashboard, evaluation, message, or comparison may produce different conclusions because of presentation choices rather than because the underlying situation has changed."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Every exact instance presents one factual object through two or more logically equivalent frames.", "role_mapping": "Same facts -> framed object; variants -> equivalent presentations.", "slug": "framing", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b029_a14_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The same facts can be worded, ordered, visualized, categorized, or compared in multiple plausible ways. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The same facts can be worded, ordered, visualized, categorized, or compared in multiple plausible ways."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Framing", "one_liner": "Presentation shapes perception.", "page_ref": "prime:framing", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Same facts -> framed object; variants -> equivalent presentations.", "slug": "framing", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Every exact instance presents one factual object through two or more logically equivalent frames."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The same facts admit multiple plausible wordings, orders, visualizations, categories, or comparisons.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Reference-point and salience changes over equivalent content produce the required measurable judgment or behavior shift.", "role_mapping": "Presentation change -> frame; response change -> framing effect.", "slug": "framing", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b029_a14_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Small changes in labels, baselines, defaults, denominators, or visual emphasis may change interpretation or action. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Small changes in labels, baselines, defaults, denominators, or visual emphasis may change interpretation or action."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Framing", "one_liner": "Presentation shapes perception.", "page_ref": "prime:framing", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Presentation change -> frame; response change -> framing effect.", "slug": "framing", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Reference-point and salience changes over equivalent content produce the required measurable judgment or behavior shift."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Changes in labels, baselines, defaults, denominators, or emphasis alter interpretation or action while facts stay fixed.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Responses or decisions will be treated as evidence of preference, risk, priority, performance, fairness, or truth.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when a survey, dashboard, decision aid, evaluation, report, interface, or message will be treated as evidence, yet the response may change if the same information is presented differently. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Responses or decisions will be treated as evidence of preference, risk, priority, performance, fairness, or truth. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Responses or decisions will be treated as evidence of preference, risk, priority, performance, fairness, or truth.", "Use this archetype when a survey, dashboard, decision aid, evaluation, report, interface, or message will be treated as evidence, yet the response may change if the same information is presented differently."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "Responses or decisions will be treated as evidence of preference, risk, priority, performance, fairness, or truth."}, {"display_text": "The actor creating the presentation has an incentive, habit, or blind spot that may make one frame appear natural.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Every presentation makes some aspects salient and others less visible, but decisions often need to know whether the resulting judgment reflects the underlying information or the chosen frame. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The actor creating the presentation has an incentive, habit, or blind spot that may make one frame appear natural. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The actor creating the presentation has an incentive, habit, or blind spot that may make one frame appear natural.", "Every presentation makes some aspects salient and others less visible, but decisions often need to know whether the resulting judgment reflects the underlying information or the chosen frame."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The actor creating the presentation has an incentive, habit, or blind spot that may make one frame appear natural."}, {"display_text": "The output will travel to downstream users who may not know that presentation choices shaped the result.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The structural problem is that presentation choices can become hidden causal inputs into judgment. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The output will travel to downstream users who may not know that presentation choices shaped the result. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The output will travel to downstream users who may not know that presentation choices shaped the result.", "The structural problem is that presentation choices can become hidden causal inputs into judgment."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The output will travel to downstream users who may not know that presentation choices shaped the result."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 29, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-029", "ledger_sha256": "44a68c156a21a81f938ebbc6a5322602952e71553f758ffe6a5e3a13f6ce7285"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": [{"groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A clearly non-editorial advertisement would falsify frame naturalization, but it is outside native-advertising confusion because it lacks editorial cue imitation and channel-signal decoupling.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Native-advertising confusion", "one_liner": "Diagnose a media artifact by splitting its content from its channel signal, so the failure becomes a decoupling — editorial-coded layout asserting journalistic provenance over commercially-incentivized content — and credibility tracks the signal, not the disclosure label.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:native_advertising_confusion", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "native_advertising_confusion"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "native_advertising_confusion", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P052-C04-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent exact-record review: The exact record necessarily links a differently incentivized sender to editorial-coded cue imitation and signal-keyed credibility transfer. The effect is audience-contingent rather than certain, satisfying the source's may modality."}], "publication_role": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT_ONLY", "source_residual_occurrence_id": "r:framing_effect_audit:b029_a14_c4", "unit": {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P052-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must include the presentation creator and presented frame.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A creator produces a presentation that embodies a frame.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The incentive must attach to the creator and be relevant to frame selection or presentation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The creator has an incentive relevant to framing.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The incentive must be capable of naturalizing the frame, not merely coexist with it.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The incentive can make one frame appear natural.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must preserve the source's 'may' modality.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The naturalizing effect is possible rather than certain.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "The presentation's creator has an incentive that may make one frame appear natural.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A presentation creator's relevant incentive may make one frame appear natural.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P052-C04-U1"}}, {"groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A mere restyling that preserves all encoded meaning would falsify substantive presentation dependence but is expressly outside the exact breakage condition.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Responsive-Layout Breakage", "one_liner": "Diagnose the silent UI failure where an interface's content survives a viewport, device, or locale transformation but its layout-encoded meaning — priority, adjacency, hierarchy, above-the-fold prominence — is lost, so a passing content-accessibility check actively conceals the defect.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:responsive_layout_breakage", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "responsive_layout_breakage"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "responsive_layout_breakage", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P052-C05-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent exact-record review: The exact record requires layout choices to carry substantive meaning, a later viewport/device transformation to transmit a changed rendering, and a silent partial failure whose presentation dependence may be unknown to users."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "An openly labeled exploratory analysis would make the dependence known, but it is not HARKing because the defining temporal misrepresentation is absent.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "HARKing (Hypothesizing After the Results are Known)", "one_liner": "The research practice of building a hypothesis by inspecting already-collected data and then presenting it as if it had been specified in advance, silently inflating the reported false-positive rate because the test's independence assumption is violated.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:harking", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "harking"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "harking", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P052-C05-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent exact-record review: HARKing necessarily makes the reported inferential result presentation-dependent by portraying a data-derived hypothesis as a priori, then publishes that account while readers cannot recover the true hypothesis-result order."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "If the audience fully corrected for allocation criteria and did not read salience as importance, the distorted posterior would disappear and the exact candidate would no longer hold.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Agenda Distortion", "one_liner": "The structural pattern in which the volume of media attention an issue receives becomes the audience's cue for its importance — even though coverage is allocated by newsworthiness and shareability, criteria that have little to do with actual significance.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:agenda_distortion", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "agenda_distortion"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "agenda_distortion", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P052-C05-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent exact-record review: The exact record requires selection criteria to shape the broadcast salience profile and an audience to read that profile as significance despite the generation mismatch, preserving possible unawareness of the dependence."}], "publication_role": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT_ONLY", "source_residual_occurrence_id": "r:framing_effect_audit:b029_a14_c5", "unit": {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P052-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must include a framed output and users downstream of its creation.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A presentation-shaped output and its downstream users are distinct roles.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The output must be substantively presentation-dependent, not merely reformatted.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Presentation choices shaped the output's result.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Downstream travel must occur after creation of the shaped result.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The output is subsequently transmitted to downstream users.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Possible unawareness must be preserved without requiring actual ignorance by all users.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The downstream users may lack knowledge of the presentation dependence.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "A presentation-shaped output will travel to downstream users who may not know that presentation choices shaped the result.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A presentation-dependent output is transmitted downstream to users who may be unaware of that dependence.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P052-C05-U1"}}]}
{"archetype": {"name": "Free-Rider Mitigation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:free_rider_mitigation", "slug": "free_rider_mitigation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A shared benefit is difficult or undesirable to exclude, yet provision depends on voluntary or weakly enforced contributions. Participants can retain benefits while shifting production or maintenance costs onto others, causing resentment, withdrawal, overload, or collapse of the good.\n", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A shared benefit is difficult or undesirable to exclude, yet provision depends on voluntary or weakly enforced contributions. Participants can retain benefits while shifting production or maintenance costs onto others, causing resentment, withdrawal, overload, or collapse of the good."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact pattern separates non-excludable shared benefit from individual contribution cost.", "role_mapping": "Shared benefits -> non-excludable good; burden -> private contribution cost.", "slug": "free_riding", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b029_a15_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A shared benefit is difficult or undesirable to exclude, yet provision depends on voluntary or weakly enforced contributions. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Benefits are shared more broadly than contribution burdens.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Benefits are shared more broadly than contribution burdens.", "A shared benefit is difficult or undesirable to exclude, yet provision depends on voluntary or weakly enforced contributions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Free Riding", "one_liner": "The systematic under-provision that results when individuals can enjoy a non-excludable shared good without contributing proportionately to producing it.", "page_ref": "prime:free_riding", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Shared benefits -> non-excludable good; burden -> private contribution cost.", "slug": "free_riding", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact pattern separates non-excludable shared benefit from individual contribution cost."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Benefits are shared more broadly than contribution burdens.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Private contribution cost plus weak exclusion or enforcement creates the rational non-contribution incentive.", "role_mapping": "Costly contribution -> private burden; avoidability -> non-excludability or low enforcement.", "slug": "free_riding", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b029_a15_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Individual contributions are costly, weakly observable, or easy to avoid. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Individual contributions are costly, weakly observable, or easy to avoid."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Free Riding", "one_liner": "The systematic under-provision that results when individuals can enjoy a non-excludable shared good without contributing proportionately to producing it.", "page_ref": "prime:free_riding", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Costly contribution -> private burden; avoidability -> non-excludability or low enforcement.", "slug": "free_riding", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Private contribution cost plus weak exclusion or enforcement creates the rational non-contribution incentive."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Individual contribution is costly and weakly observable or easy to avoid.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P052-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must include contributions, the shared target, and a threshold role.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Under-contribution episodes affect a shared good governed by a threshold.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must require recurrence rather than one deficient contribution.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Under-contribution occurs repeatedly.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Risk or threat must be entailed without strengthening it to completed crossing.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The pattern threatens the threshold without requiring actual failure.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The contribution pattern must cause the risk.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Recurring under-contribution creates the threshold threat.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a provision threshold.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The threatened threshold governs provision of the shared good.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a maintenance threshold.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The threatened threshold governs maintenance of the shared good.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Repeated under-contribution threatens a provision or maintenance threshold.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Recurring under-contribution puts a shared good's provision or maintenance threshold at risk.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P052-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Under-provision is mandatory, but repeated episodes and a discrete provision threshold are not.", "slug": "free_riding"}], "residual_id": "r:free_rider_mitigation:b029_a15_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b029_a15_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Repeated undercontribution threatens a provision or maintenance threshold. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Repeated undercontribution threatens a provision or maintenance threshold."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Under-provision is mandatory, but repeated episodes and a discrete provision threshold are not.", "slug": "free_riding"}], "normalized_requirement": "Repeated under-contribution threatens a provision or maintenance threshold.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Repeated under-contribution threatens a provision or maintenance threshold.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Participants doubt that enough others will contribute.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Participants can retain benefits while shifting production or maintenance costs onto others, causing resentment, withdrawal, overload, or collapse of the good. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Participants doubt that enough others will contribute. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Participants doubt that enough others will contribute.", "Participants can retain benefits while shifting production or maintenance costs onto others, causing resentment, withdrawal, overload, or collapse of the good."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Participants doubt that enough others will contribute."}, {"display_text": "Uniform contribution demands ignore materially different capacity or benefit.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A shared benefit is difficult or undesirable to exclude, yet provision depends on voluntary or weakly enforced contributions. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Uniform contribution demands ignore materially different capacity or benefit. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Uniform contribution demands ignore materially different capacity or benefit.", "A shared benefit is difficult or undesirable to exclude, yet provision depends on voluntary or weakly enforced contributions."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Uniform contribution demands ignore materially different capacity or benefit."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 29, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-029", "ledger_sha256": "44a68c156a21a81f938ebbc6a5322602952e71553f758ffe6a5e3a13f6ce7285"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": [{"groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A pre-assigned guaranteed volunteer would remove the focal participant's doubt, but the exact record identifies that symmetry-breaking arrangement as the remedy outside the dilemma.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Volunteer's Dilemma", "one_liner": "A game where a shared good is produced if any single member pays a private cost to provide it, so each prefers someone else volunteer — and, counterintuitively, larger groups grow no more (often less) likely to produce it.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:volunteers_dilemma", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "volunteers_dilemma"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "volunteers_dilemma", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P052-C06-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent exact-record review: The symmetric mixed-strategy equilibrium necessarily leaves each participant uncertain whether at least one other participant will volunteer, with a positive no-volunteer probability that persists as the group grows."}], "publication_role": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT_ONLY", "source_residual_occurrence_id": "r:free_rider_mitigation:b029_a15_c3", "unit": {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P052-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must distinguish the doubting participant from other potential contributors.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A focal participant evaluates expected contributions from other participants.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The relation must be a participant's adverse belief, not merely an observed shortfall.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The focal participant doubts that the others will contribute.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Sufficiency must quantify distinct other participants expected to contribute; aggregate contribution quantity from one or a few actors cannot substitute for enough others.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The doubt concerns whether a sufficient number or proportion of distinct other participants will contribute.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The relation must preserve uncertainty about future contribution.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The questioned contributions are prospective.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "Participants doubt that enough others will contribute.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A participant doubts that contributions by enough other participants will be forthcoming.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P052-C06-U1"}}]}
{"archetype": {"name": "Function-Without-Intent Caution", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:function_without_intent_caution", "slug": "function_without_intent_caution"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 4, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 4 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a collapsed explanation. People see that something serves a role and compress several different claims into one sentence: what it does, why it exists, who intended it, who benefits from it, and what should be done about it. That collapse produces two common errors. The first is over-attribution: assuming design or motive from function alone. The second is under-accountability: assuming that if no original intent can be proven, the current function does not matter.\n\nThis problem appears across institutions, products, organizations, ecosystems, historical interpretation, and policy. In each case, the intervention is not to ban functional language, but to scope it carefully.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Actors observe that something serves a purpose-like role and infer that it must have been intentionally designed, originally created, or morally intended for that role. The result is overconfident explanation, misplaced blame, missed accountability for current maintenance, or poor intervention design."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P052-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must apply to a phenomenon or object that can bear a purpose-like reading.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An observed entity may manifest as a pattern or artifact.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Apparent function must be entailed without requiring proven intentional design.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The entity appears to serve a purpose-like role.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires unresolved origin, not merely a disliked origin.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The entity's origin remains unclear.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires unresolved intent, not proof that no intent existed.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The entity's intent remains unclear.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "A pattern or artifact appears to serve a purpose even though its origin or intent is unclear.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An observed entity appears purpose-serving while either its origin or its intent remains unclear.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P052-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Teleology can be an explicit explanation grounded in selection, design, or systemic role and need not leave origin or intent unclear.", "slug": "teleology"}], "residual_id": "r:function_without_intent_caution:b030_a01_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b030_a01_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A pattern or artifact appears to “serve a purpose” even though its origin or intent is unclear. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A pattern or artifact appears to “serve a purpose” even though its origin or intent is unclear."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Teleology can be an explicit explanation grounded in selection, design, or systemic role and need not leave origin or intent unclear.", "slug": "teleology"}], "normalized_requirement": "A pattern or artifact appears purpose-serving while its origin or intent remains unclear.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A pattern or artifact appears purpose-serving while its origin or intent remains unclear.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P052-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must include disputants, the feature or practice, and its current effect.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "People debate an extant feature or practice that has a current effect.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A live dispute about intended production is required, not one observer's uncertainty.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The disputants disagree whether the feature was meant to produce that effect.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The historical-intent versus present-effect relation must be preserved.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The disputed intent is prior while the effect is current.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The debate must concern intended production, not unrelated intent.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The disputed proposition is that intent aimed to produce the effect.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "People dispute whether a present institutional, biological, designed, or social feature was intended to produce its current effect.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "People dispute whether an extant feature or practice was intended to produce its current effect.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P052-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Teleological explanation need not contain disagreement over whether the effect was intended.", "slug": "teleology"}], "residual_id": "r:function_without_intent_caution:b030_a01_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b030_a01_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: People are debating whether an institution, rule, design feature, biological trait, or social practice was meant to produce its current effect. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["People are debating whether an institution, rule, design feature, biological trait, or social practice was meant to produce its current effect."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Teleological explanation need not contain disagreement over whether the effect was intended.", "slug": "teleology"}], "normalized_requirement": "People dispute whether a present institutional, biological, designed, or social effect was intended.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "People dispute whether a present institutional, biological, designed, or social effect was intended.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P052-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must include a present effect and a motive attributed to an origin.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A current effect and an alleged original motive occupy distinct roles.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The effect-to-motive evidentiary inference must be required.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The current effect is used as proof of the original motive.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The backward inference from present outcome to prior motive must be preserved.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The inferred motive is original or historical relative to the effect.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a harmful current effect.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The evidentiary current effect is a harm.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a beneficial current effect.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The evidentiary current effect is a benefit.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "A present harm or benefit is treated as proof of an original motive.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A current effect's harmful or beneficial valence is used as proof of an original motive.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P052-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Teleological explanation can distinguish current systemic function from historical selection or design and need not infer motive from effect.", "slug": "teleology"}], "residual_id": "r:function_without_intent_caution:b030_a01_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b030_a01_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A current harm or benefit is being used as proof of original motive. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A current harm or benefit is being used as proof of original motive."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Teleological explanation can distinguish current systemic function from historical selection or design and need not infer motive from effect.", "slug": "teleology"}], "normalized_requirement": "A present harm or benefit is treated as proof of an original motive.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A present harm or benefit is treated as proof of an original motive.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P052-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must include the actor, present effects, and intent-status premise.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An actor evaluates present effects in relation to explicit intent.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The negative intent-status premise must be preserved.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Explicit intent is lacking or not established.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Intent status must be a reason for the conclusion, not a separate observation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The actor uses that lack as grounds for an evaluative conclusion.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Discounting or denial of present importance must be entailed.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The conclusion dismisses the importance of current effects.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The target must be present effects rather than only historical outcomes.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The dismissed effects are current.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "An actor uses lack of explicit intent to dismiss the importance of current effects.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An actor treats lack of explicit intent as grounds for dismissing the importance of present effects.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P052-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Omission bias compares harms caused by action and inaction and does not require an intent-based dismissal of current effects.", "slug": "omission_bias"}], "residual_id": "r:function_without_intent_caution:b030_a01_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b030_a01_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: An actor uses lack of explicit intent to dismiss the importance of current effects. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["An actor uses lack of explicit intent to dismiss the importance of current effects."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Omission bias compares harms caused by action and inaction and does not require an intent-based dismissal of current effects.", "slug": "omission_bias"}], "normalized_requirement": "An actor treats absent explicit intent as grounds for dismissing present effects.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "An actor treats absent explicit intent as grounds for dismissing present effects.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "DISJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A redesign or intervention depends on whether the current function is intended, accidental, emergent, or repurposed.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially helpful when a pattern has a visible function but the history is unclear, when actors disagree about whether a harmful effect was intended, or when a current function differs from the official or original rationale. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: A redesign or intervention depends on whether the current function is intended, accidental, emergent, or repurposed. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A redesign or intervention depends on whether the current function is intended, accidental, emergent, or repurposed.", "It is especially helpful when a pattern has a visible function but the history is unclear, when actors disagree about whether a harmful effect was intended, or when a current function differs from the official or original rationale."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "A redesign or intervention depends on whether the current function is intended, accidental, emergent, or repurposed."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 30, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-030", "ledger_sha256": "714f2e058f938d9ad32f7100b9598868b07671a43abb1e866620c2ddeda9b309"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Functional Porosity Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:functional_porosity_design", "slug": "functional_porosity_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A bulk needs internal capacity, exchange, transport, compliance, insulation, surface function, or lower mass, but indiscriminate void creation weakens load paths, creates leakage and contamination routes, traps residuals, or produces unstable and unmanufacturable microstructure. Conversely, densification may improve strength while destroying access, drainage, storage, or interface function. The system lacks a controlled architecture that makes these competing properties jointly explicit.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A bulk needs internal capacity, exchange, transport, compliance, insulation, surface function, or lower mass, but indiscriminate void creation weakens load paths, creates leakage and contamination routes, traps residuals, or produces unstable and unmanufacturable microstructure. Conversely, densification may improve strength while destroying access, drainage, storage, or interface function. The system lacks a controlled architecture that makes these competing properties jointly explicit."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime requires distributed internal void fraction, connectivity, and size distribution to set bulk function.", "role_mapping": "Internal void volume and geometry -> distributed pore network; bulk behavior -> capacity, transport, and strength coupling.", "slug": "porosity", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b030_a02_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Bulk behavior depends on internal void volume and geometry rather than only composition or external form. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Bulk behavior depends on internal void volume and geometry rather than only composition or external form."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Porosity", "one_liner": "A bulk holds a distributed fraction of internal void space whose total, connectivity, and distribution jointly set storage capacity, transmissibility, and mechanical strength.", "page_ref": "prime:porosity", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Internal void volume and geometry -> distributed pore network; bulk behavior -> capacity, transport, and strength coupling.", "slug": "porosity", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime requires distributed internal void fraction, connectivity, and size distribution to set bulk function."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Bulk behavior depends on internal void volume and geometry rather than composition or external form alone.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Connectivity and pore-size distribution are mandatory determinants of transmissibility and storage in the exact record.", "role_mapping": "Connectivity or throat geometry -> pore-network variables; performance -> transport or storage response.", "slug": "porosity", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b030_a02_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Void connectivity, throat sizes, accessibility, or orientation materially changes performance. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Void connectivity, throat sizes, accessibility, or orientation materially changes performance."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Porosity", "one_liner": "A bulk holds a distributed fraction of internal void space whose total, connectivity, and distribution jointly set storage capacity, transmissibility, and mechanical strength.", "page_ref": "prime:porosity", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Connectivity or throat geometry -> pore-network variables; performance -> transport or storage response.", "slug": "porosity", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Connectivity and pore-size distribution are mandatory determinants of transmissibility and storage in the exact record."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Void connectivity, throat size, accessibility, or orientation materially changes performance.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P052-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must include a porous structure and porosity as the changed property.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A structure has porosity established at initial creation.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The named mechanism must be capable of altering porosity, not merely coincide with change.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Manufacturing can cause the structure's porosity to change.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The source's 'can alter' modality must be preserved.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The porosity change is possible rather than necessary.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Post-creation evolution must be distinguished from initial formation.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The porosity alteration occurs after initial creation.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "Manufacturing can alter porosity after initial creation.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Manufacturing can change a structure's porosity after that porosity is initially created.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P052-C13-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P052-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must include a porous structure and porosity as the changed property.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A structure has porosity established at initial creation.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The named mechanism must be capable of altering porosity, not merely coincide with change.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Compaction can cause the structure's porosity to change.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The source's 'can alter' modality must be preserved.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The porosity change is possible rather than necessary.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Post-creation evolution must be distinguished from initial formation.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The porosity alteration occurs after initial creation.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "Compaction can alter porosity after initial creation.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Compaction can change a structure's porosity after that porosity is initially created.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P052-C13-U2"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P052-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must include a porous structure and porosity as the changed property.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A structure has porosity established at initial creation.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The named mechanism must be capable of altering porosity, not merely coincide with change.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Swelling can cause the structure's porosity to change.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The source's 'can alter' modality must be preserved.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The porosity change is possible rather than necessary.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Post-creation evolution must be distinguished from initial formation.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The porosity alteration occurs after initial creation.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "Swelling can alter porosity after initial creation.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Swelling can change a structure's porosity after that porosity is initially created.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P052-C13-U3"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P052-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must include a porous structure and porosity as the changed property.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A structure has porosity established at initial creation.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The named mechanism must be capable of altering porosity, not merely coincide with change.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Fouling can cause the structure's porosity to change.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The source's 'can alter' modality must be preserved.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The porosity change is possible rather than necessary.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Post-creation evolution must be distinguished from initial formation.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The porosity alteration occurs after initial creation.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "Fouling can alter porosity after initial creation.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Fouling can change a structure's porosity after that porosity is initially created.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P052-C13-U4"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P052-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must include a porous structure and porosity as the changed property.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A structure has porosity established at initial creation.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The named mechanism must be capable of altering porosity, not merely coincide with change.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Loading can cause the structure's porosity to change.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The source's 'can alter' modality must be preserved.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The porosity change is possible rather than necessary.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Post-creation evolution must be distinguished from initial formation.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The porosity alteration occurs after initial creation.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "Loading can alter porosity after initial creation.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Loading can change a structure's porosity after that porosity is initially created.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P052-C13-U5"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P052-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must include a porous structure and porosity as the changed property.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A structure has porosity established at initial creation.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The named mechanism must be capable of altering porosity, not merely coincide with change.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Aging can cause the structure's porosity to change.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The source's 'can alter' modality must be preserved.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The porosity change is possible rather than necessary.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Post-creation evolution must be distinguished from initial formation.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The porosity alteration occurs after initial creation.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "Aging can alter porosity after initial creation.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Aging can change a structure's porosity after that porosity is initially created.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P052-C13-U6"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Porosity can remain stable after formation; post-creation evolution is not mandatory.", "slug": "porosity"}], "residual_id": "r:functional_porosity_design:b030_a02_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b030_a02_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Manufacturing, compaction, swelling, fouling, loading, or aging can alter porosity after initial creation. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Manufacturing, compaction, swelling, fouling, loading, or aging can alter porosity after initial creation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PARTIALLY_DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Karst-collapse subsidence preserves the DSA while falsifying compaction, so the unguarded candidate does not entail O2.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Subsidence", "one_liner": "Explain the downward descent of the ground surface as loss or rearrangement of subsurface support, routed through one channel — a change in the Terzaghi effective-stress state — so any driver's cause and reversibility read off a single ledger.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:subsidence", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "subsidence_driver_is_postformation_compaction", "predicate": "The subsidence driver is compaction of the already-formed porous supporting medium.", "rationale": "The retained expression and its sole qualifier pass necessity and laundering checks."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "subsidence"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "subsidence_driver_is_postformation_compaction"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "subsidence", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P052-C13-U2", "why_it_fits": "Independent exact-record review: The candidate directly supplies an existing porous structure, possible post-formation alteration, and the causal response; one named branch selection supplies compaction."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Groundwater-withdrawal subsidence preserves the DSA while falsifying loading as the driver, so the unguarded candidate fails O2.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Subsidence", "one_liner": "Explain the downward descent of the ground surface as loss or rearrangement of subsurface support, routed through one channel — a change in the Terzaghi effective-stress state — so any driver's cause and reversibility read off a single ledger.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:subsidence", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "subsidence_driver_is_postformation_loading", "predicate": "The subsidence driver is loading of the already-formed porous supporting medium.", "rationale": "The retained expression and its sole qualifier pass necessity and laundering checks."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "subsidence"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "subsidence_driver_is_postformation_loading"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "subsidence", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P052-C13-U5", "why_it_fits": "Independent exact-record review: The exact record supplies the porous structure and post-formation consolidation spine; one candidate-named driver selection makes loading necessary."}], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 6, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 2, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 4}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Porosity can remain stable after formation; post-creation evolution is not mandatory.", "slug": "porosity"}], "normalized_requirement": "Manufacture, loading, fouling, swelling, or aging changes porosity after creation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "PARTIAL_EXISTING_DSA_GROUNDING", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation grounded 2 of 6 eligible atomic units; the remaining unit or units stayed open."}, "predicate": "Manufacture, loading, fouling, swelling, or aging changes porosity after creation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Microstructure can govern bulk properties while being periodic or homogeneous enough for local measurements to represent the whole.", "slug": "microstructure"}], "residual_id": "r:functional_porosity_design:b030_a02_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b030_a02_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Local measurements may not represent the whole bulk because the microstructure is heterogeneous or multiscale. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Local measurements may not represent the whole bulk because the microstructure is heterogeneous or multiscale."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Microstructure can govern bulk properties while being periodic or homogeneous enough for local measurements to represent the whole.", "slug": "microstructure"}], "normalized_requirement": "Heterogeneous or multiscale microstructure makes local measurements unrepresentative of the bulk.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Heterogeneous or multiscale microstructure makes local measurements unrepresentative of the bulk.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Storage, infiltration, drainage, filtration, reaction, tissue ingrowth, insulation, buoyancy, compliance, or lightweighting is a required function.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Conversely, densification may improve strength while destroying access, drainage, storage, or interface function. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: Storage, infiltration, drainage, filtration, reaction, tissue ingrowth, insulation, buoyancy, compliance, or lightweighting is a required function. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Storage, infiltration, drainage, filtration, reaction, tissue ingrowth, insulation, buoyancy, compliance, or lightweighting is a required function.", "Conversely, densification may improve strength while destroying access, drainage, storage, or interface function."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "Storage, infiltration, drainage, filtration, reaction, tissue ingrowth, insulation, buoyancy, compliance, or lightweighting is a required function."}, {"display_text": "Strength, stiffness, toughness, containment, dimensional stability, or fatigue life must remain above a non-negotiable floor.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this deployment constraint: Strength, stiffness, toughness, containment, dimensional stability, or fatigue life must remain above a non-negotiable floor. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Strength, stiffness, toughness, containment, dimensional stability, or fatigue life must remain above a non-negotiable floor."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Strength, stiffness, toughness, containment, dimensional stability, or fatigue life must remain above a non-negotiable floor."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 30, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-030", "ledger_sha256": "714f2e058f938d9ad32f7100b9598868b07671a43abb1e866620c2ddeda9b309"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Functional Specification", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:functional_specification", "slug": "functional_specification"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 5, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 3, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 3, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 3 of 5 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is behavioral ambiguity around a function-like element. Something receives inputs and produces outputs, but the mapping is implicit, inconsistent, undocumented, or contested.\n\nThis ambiguity appears in many domains. A software service may accept requests but fail to say which errors are possible. A policy may state an intent but not define how eligibility decisions are made. A role may have a title but no clear handoffs or deliverables. A clinical protocol may describe ordinary treatment but leave contraindications or escalation behavior unclear.\n\nThe result is a reliability gap. Users cannot predict behavior, implementers cannot reproduce it, auditors cannot evaluate it, and replacement providers cannot be compared against a stable expectation.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A component, process, role, model, or policy receives inputs and produces outputs, but the expected transformation is ambiguous, inconsistent, undocumented, or contested."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P052-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must include a subject or interface and its specified behavior.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A functional subject is expected to exhibit a stated behavior.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Normative or contractual required status must be preserved.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The behavior is required rather than optional.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The relation must concern observable behavior or input-output effect.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The required behavior is externally observable.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must preserve insufficient determinacy in what observable behavior is required; material stakes or logically incompatible readings are not required.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "What externally observable behavior is required is ambiguous or permits multiple plausible interpretations.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Required externally observable behavior is ambiguous.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A functional subject's required externally observable behavior is insufficiently determinate.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P052-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An abstract data type requires an explicit behavioral contract and therefore does not entail ambiguity.", "slug": "abstract_data_type"}], "residual_id": "r:functional_specification:b030_a03_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b030_a03_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Behavioral ambiguity. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["behavioral_ambiguity"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "An ambiguous permissive authorization boundary is a complete candidate instance but does not make the relevant behavior required.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Rules-of-Engagement Ambiguity", "one_liner": "Diagnose frontline breakdown under time pressure as a grain mismatch — decision rules written coarser than the environment generates choice points — paid out of a finite discretion budget, relocating the fix from the operator's judgment to the rule, escalation path, and pre-positioned authority.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:rules_of_engagement_ambiguity", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2"], "guard_type": "MODALITY_ACTUALIZATION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "ambiguous_rule_prescribes_mandatory_conduct", "predicate": "The ambiguous decision rule prescribes mandatory frontline conduct.", "rationale": "The retained expression and its sole qualifier pass necessity and laundering checks."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "rules_of_engagement_ambiguity"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "ambiguous_rule_prescribes_mandatory_conduct"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "rules_of_engagement_ambiguity", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P052-C14-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent exact-record review: The candidate directly entails externally observable decision behavior and insufficient determinacy; one deontic qualifier supplies required status."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A sharp intent statement that uniquely disambiguates every plausible changed-condition action falsifies the exact ambiguity candidate.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Commander's-Intent Ambiguity", "one_liner": "Locate incoherent decentralized execution in the purpose artefact one level up: when delegated subordinates must re-derive action under changed conditions but the intent statement is too imprecise to disambiguate their choice, locally rational actions aggregate into globally incoherent outcomes.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:commanders_intent_ambiguity", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "commanders_intent_ambiguity"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "commanders_intent_ambiguity", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P052-C14-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent exact-record review: The exact record requires a purpose statement too imprecise to disambiguate correct subordinate action, while the mission architecture normatively requires action that serves the higher purpose."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "An ambiguous optional button label is microcopy ambiguity but does not specify a behavior the user is required to perform.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Microcopy Ambiguity", "one_liner": "The HCI failure where a terse interface label admits more than one reading, so the user decompresses it against a prior different from the designer's and acts correctly on the wrong interpretation.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:microcopy_ambiguity", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1", "O2", "O3"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "ambiguous_microcopy_is_mandatory_action_instruction", "predicate": "The ambiguous microcopy is a mandatory instruction prescribing an externally observable user action.", "rationale": "The retained expression and its sole qualifier pass necessity and laundering checks."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "microcopy_ambiguity"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "ambiguous_microcopy_is_mandatory_action_instruction"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "microcopy_ambiguity", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P052-C14-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent exact-record review: The candidate directly supplies multiple plausible readings. One candidate-anchored instruction subtype provides the functional subject, required modality, and observable behavior in a single relation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Required externally observable behavior is ambiguous.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P052-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must include the specification and behavior against which conformance is judged.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A functional specification states or is meant to state required behavior.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A gap or absence in criteria must be entailed.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The specification lacks adequate conformance criteria.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The gap must concern deciding conformity, not general documentation quality.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The missing criteria would determine conformance to specified behavior.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "An executable, observable, or operationally checkable standard must be required.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The required conformance criteria must be testable.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "The specification leaves a gap in testable conformance criteria.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A functional specification lacks testable criteria for deciding whether required behavior conforms.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P052-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact prime requires verifiable conformance; a testability gap is its inverse failure state.", "slug": "abstract_data_type"}], "residual_id": "r:functional_specification:b030_a03_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b030_a03_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Testability gap. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["testability_gap"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact prime requires verifiable conformance; a testability gap is its inverse failure state.", "slug": "abstract_data_type"}], "normalized_requirement": "The specification leaves a gap in testable conformance criteria.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The specification leaves a gap in testable conformance criteria.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A conforming abstract-data-type implementation is substitutable by construction and need not create procurement risk.", "slug": "abstract_data_type"}], "residual_id": "r:functional_specification:b030_a03_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b030_a03_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Substitution or procurement risk. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["substitution_or_procurement_risk"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A conforming abstract-data-type implementation is substitutable by construction and need not create procurement risk.", "slug": "abstract_data_type"}], "normalized_requirement": "Ambiguous required behavior creates substitution or procurement risk.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Ambiguous required behavior creates substitution or procurement risk.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P053-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must explicitly concern a contract or specification of behavior, not accountability in an unrelated setting.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The subject is a behavioral contract governing expected behavior or transformation.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must make accountability apply to the contract's outcomes rather than merely naming accountability as a general virtue.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Accountability is tied to the outcomes governed or produced under that contract.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail missing, unassigned, or unresolved outcome accountability; explicit assignment does not satisfy this obligation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The contract leaves that outcome accountability unresolved.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "A behavioral contract leaves accountability for its outcomes unresolved.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A behavioral contract does not resolve who is accountable for its outcomes.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P053-C01-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Accountability can be explicit while a functional specification remains incomplete, and responsibility alone does not entail a contract gap.", "slug": "accountability"}], "residual_id": "r:functional_specification:b030_a03_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b030_a03_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Accountability gap. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["accountability_gap"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A build-trap instance with output accountability but an explicitly owned outcome would falsify O3, but the exact record excludes it by making absent outcome ownership constitutive.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_BRIDGE", "name": "Build Trap", "one_liner": "Diagnose a team that ships at high velocity yet moves no business outcome — because its measurement, calendar, and incentives are all set to what was built rather than to whether it mattered — by reading those three dials and asking what outcome the team owns.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:build_trap", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "TYPE_SUBSUMPTION", "kind": "INTERPRETIVE_BRIDGE", "normalized_key": "accountability_regime_is_behavioral_contract", "predicate": "A team's measurement-and-incentive accountability regime is a behavioral contract governing its delivery behavior.", "rationale": "The exact structural spine plus one generally valid anchored bridge necessarily entails the complete DNF branch."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "build_trap"}, {"kind": "INTERPRETIVE_BRIDGE", "value": "accountability_regime_is_behavioral_contract"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "build_trap", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P053-C01-U1", "why_it_fits": "The DSA directly entails absent accountability for the work's outcomes; one general type bridge identifies its measurement-and-incentive regime as the behavioral contract."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The behavioral contract leaves accountability for outcomes unresolved.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B5", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P053-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must apply to an edge or boundary case within a functional specification, not merely to ordinary execution failure.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The deficient specification concerns an edge case of the intended function.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail inadequate specification of the edge case; a fully specified but faulty implementation does not satisfy it.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "That edge case is absent, ambiguous, or otherwise insufficiently specified.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail the causal direction from inadequate edge-case specification to failure, rather than mere correlation or testing.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The edge-case underspecification causes a failure.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "An underspecified edge case causes failure.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Insufficient specification of an edge case causes the specified function to fail.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P053-C02-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Fuzzing can test a complete specification and need not reveal or presuppose an omitted functional requirement.", "slug": "fuzzing"}], "residual_id": "r:functional_specification:b030_a03_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b030_a03_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Edge case failure. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["edge_case_failure"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A fully covering rule with wrong content would not establish underspecification, but the exact record excludes content errors. Every complete ambiguity instance lacks a decidable answer for a predictable encountered situation and causes breakdown.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Rules-of-Engagement Ambiguity", "one_liner": "Diagnose frontline breakdown under time pressure as a grain mismatch — decision rules written coarser than the environment generates choice points — paid out of a finite discretion budget, relocating the fix from the operator's judgment to the rule, escalation path, and pre-positioned authority.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:rules_of_engagement_ambiguity", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "rules_of_engagement_ambiguity"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "rules_of_engagement_ambiguity", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P053-C02-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact identity necessarily contains a predictable edge situation, a decision rule too coarse to specify it, and failure caused by that grain mismatch. All obligations are directly entailed."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "An underspecified edge case causes failure.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 5", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "DISJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 30, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-030", "ledger_sha256": "714f2e058f938d9ad32f7100b9598868b07671a43abb1e866620c2ddeda9b309"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Functional Vacancy Backfill", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:functional_vacancy_backfill", "slug": "functional_vacancy_backfill"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 6, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 6, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "6 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A designated authority, sponsor, broker, or decision-resolver remains formally occupied but is not supplying the function that made the role necessary. The visible occupancy suppresses substitute decision channels, leaving conflicts unresolved, trade-offs unmade, priorities undefended, and affected actors unsure who may legitimately act.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A designated authority, sponsor, broker, or decision-resolver remains formally occupied but is not supplying the function that made the role necessary. The visible occupancy suppresses substitute decision channels, leaving conflicts unresolved, trade-offs unmade, priorities undefended, and affected actors unsure who may legitimately act."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact pattern requires a designated role whose stated function is cross-unit conflict and tradeoff resolution.", "role_mapping": "Recognized role -> designated sponsor; decision powers -> resolution function.", "slug": "sponsor_vacuum", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b030_a04_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A role has recognized authority to resolve disputes, approve trade-offs, protect scope, allocate resources, or unblock cross-boundary decisions. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A role has recognized authority to resolve disputes, approve trade-offs, protect scope, allocate resources, or unblock cross-boundary decisions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Sponsor Vacuum", "one_liner": "A designated decision-resolving role is occupied but disengaged, and its nominal occupancy suppresses the formation of substitute decision channels, so the system loses both the function and its replacement.", "page_ref": "prime:sponsor_vacuum", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Recognized role -> designated sponsor; decision powers -> resolution function.", "slug": "sponsor_vacuum", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact pattern requires a designated role whose stated function is cross-unit conflict and tradeoff resolution."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A recognized role holds authority to resolve disputes, approve tradeoffs, protect scope, allocate resources, or unblock boundaries.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Nominal occupancy signals that the function is covered and suppresses substitute channels.", "role_mapping": "Occupied title -> occupancy signal; illegitimate substitution -> suppressed replacement.", "slug": "sponsor_vacuum", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b030_a04_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The role is formally occupied or publicly treated as occupied, so others assume substitution would be illegitimate, political, or premature. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The role is formally occupied or publicly treated as occupied, so others assume substitution would be illegitimate, political, or premature."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Sponsor Vacuum", "one_liner": "A designated decision-resolving role is occupied but disengaged, and its nominal occupancy suppresses the formation of substitute decision channels, so the system loses both the function and its replacement.", "page_ref": "prime:sponsor_vacuum", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Occupied title -> occupancy signal; illegitimate substitution -> suppressed replacement.", "slug": "sponsor_vacuum", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Nominal occupancy signals that the function is covered and suppresses substitute channels."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The role is nominally occupied, making substitution appear illegitimate or premature.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A filled but disengaged occupant is mandatory in the exact record.", "role_mapping": "Absent or unwilling occupant -> disengaged sponsor.", "slug": "sponsor_vacuum", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b030_a04_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The occupant is repeatedly absent, silent, inaccessible, uninterested, overloaded, conflicted, or unwilling to decide. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The occupant is repeatedly absent, silent, inaccessible, uninterested, overloaded, conflicted, or unwilling to decide."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Sponsor Vacuum", "one_liner": "A designated decision-resolving role is occupied but disengaged, and its nominal occupancy suppresses the formation of substitute decision channels, so the system loses both the function and its replacement.", "page_ref": "prime:sponsor_vacuum", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Absent or unwilling occupant -> disengaged sponsor.", "slug": "sponsor_vacuum", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A filled but disengaged occupant is mandatory in the exact record."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The occupant is repeatedly absent, silent, inaccessible, overloaded, conflicted, or unwilling to decide.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact pattern accumulates a backlog of load-bearing unadjudicated decisions.", "role_mapping": "Dependent decisions -> adjudication backlog.", "slug": "sponsor_vacuum", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b030_a04_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Important decisions, escalations, or protective interventions depend on that role and cannot be safely deferred indefinitely. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Important decisions, escalations, or protective interventions depend on that role and cannot be safely deferred indefinitely."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Sponsor Vacuum", "one_liner": "A designated decision-resolving role is occupied but disengaged, and its nominal occupancy suppresses the formation of substitute decision channels, so the system loses both the function and its replacement.", "page_ref": "prime:sponsor_vacuum", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Dependent decisions -> adjudication backlog.", "slug": "sponsor_vacuum", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact pattern accumulates a backlog of load-bearing unadjudicated decisions."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Important dependent decisions or interventions cannot be safely deferred.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Suppression of deputy, committee, or escalation substitutes by apparent occupancy is defining.", "role_mapping": "Potential substitutes -> replacement channels; unclear authority -> suppressed formation.", "slug": "sponsor_vacuum", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b030_a04_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Potential substitutes exist, but their authority is unclear, politically risky, or suppressed by the nominal holder’s continuing title. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Potential substitutes exist, but their authority is unclear, politically risky, or suppressed by the nominal holder’s continuing title."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Sponsor Vacuum", "one_liner": "A designated decision-resolving role is occupied but disengaged, and its nominal occupancy suppresses the formation of substitute decision channels, so the system loses both the function and its replacement.", "page_ref": "prime:sponsor_vacuum", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Potential substitutes -> replacement channels; unclear authority -> suppressed formation.", "slug": "sponsor_vacuum", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Suppression of deputy, committee, or escalation substitutes by apparent occupancy is defining."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Potential substitutes exist but their authority is unclear or suppressed by the nominal holder.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Accumulating decisions and drift from stated intent are required consequences of the compounding vacancy.", "role_mapping": "Delay effects -> backlog and program drift.", "slug": "sponsor_vacuum", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b030_a04_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Delay or unresolved ambiguity is causing scope drift, shadow processes, stalled commitments, stakeholder distrust, or degraded execution. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Delay or unresolved ambiguity is causing scope drift, shadow processes, stalled commitments, stakeholder distrust, or degraded execution."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Sponsor Vacuum", "one_liner": "A designated decision-resolving role is occupied but disengaged, and its nominal occupancy suppresses the formation of substitute decision channels, so the system loses both the function and its replacement.", "page_ref": "prime:sponsor_vacuum", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Delay effects -> backlog and program drift.", "slug": "sponsor_vacuum", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Accumulating decisions and drift from stated intent are required consequences of the compounding vacancy."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Delay and ambiguity cause drift, shadow processes, stalled commitments, distrust, or degraded execution.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 30, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-030", "ledger_sha256": "714f2e058f938d9ad32f7100b9598868b07671a43abb1e866620c2ddeda9b309"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Fundamental-Anchor Bubble Damping", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:fundamental_anchor_bubble_damping", "slug": "fundamental_anchor_bubble_damping"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Actors treat a rising price, popularity measure, valuation, funding flow, or expansion signal as evidence of underlying value, while that same interpretation drives further demand and commitment. Fundamental evidence lags, dissent is discounted, leverage or career incentives increase, and the system becomes fragile to a shift in belief.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Actors treat a rising price, popularity measure, valuation, funding flow, or expansion signal as evidence of underlying value, while that same interpretation drives further demand and commitment. Fundamental evidence lags, dissent is discounted, leverage or career incentives increase, and the system becomes fragile to a shift in belief."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Detachment from fundamental value during self-reinforcing rise is defining, across financial and nonfinancial quantities.", "role_mapping": "Rising metric -> bubble quantity; independent use or capacity -> fundamentals.", "slug": "speculative_bubble", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b030_a05_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A price, valuation, membership count, funding level, or attention metric rises faster than independently measured use, productivity, capacity, cash flow, safety, learning, or ecological carrying conditions. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A price, valuation, membership count, funding level, or attention metric rises faster than independently measured use, productivity, capacity, cash flow, safety, learning, or ecological carrying conditions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Speculative Bubble", "one_liner": "Self-reinforcing price rise detached from fundamental value.", "page_ref": "prime:speculative_bubble", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Rising metric -> bubble quantity; independent use or capacity -> fundamentals.", "slug": "speculative_bubble", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Detachment from fundamental value during self-reinforcing rise is defining, across financial and nonfinancial quantities."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Price, valuation, membership, funding, or attention rises faster than independently measured fundamentals.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Expectations of continued rise and a greater-fool inflow drive the exact dynamic.", "role_mapping": "Recent appreciation or resale belief -> expectations-driven positive feedback.", "slug": "speculative_bubble", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b030_a05_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The main argument for further commitment becomes recent appreciation, scarcity narrative, fear of missing out, or the claim that someone else will buy later. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The main argument for further commitment becomes recent appreciation, scarcity narrative, fear of missing out, or the claim that someone else will buy later."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Speculative Bubble", "one_liner": "Self-reinforcing price rise detached from fundamental value.", "page_ref": "prime:speculative_bubble", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Recent appreciation or resale belief -> expectations-driven positive feedback.", "slug": "speculative_bubble", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Expectations of continued rise and a greater-fool inflow drive the exact dynamic."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Further commitment is justified mainly by recent appreciation, scarcity narrative, fear of missing out, or later resale.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P053-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O9"], ["O1", "O2", "O4", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O4", "O9"], ["O1", "O2", "O5", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O5", "O9"], ["O1", "O2", "O6", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O6", "O9"], ["O1", "O2", "O7", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O7", "O9"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail the prior marked rise as the cause of the exact branch-specific expansion object; coexistence or a shared third cause is insufficient.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The marked rise causes the branch-specific credit, leverage, collateral-value, promotion-system, or budget-allocation expansion.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the prior-rise feedback timing, with appreciation preceding and driving the expansion.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The marked asset or claim has already risen before the resulting expansion.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must explicitly entail expansion of credit when this branch is used.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Credit expands.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must explicitly entail expansion of leverage when this branch is used.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Leverage expands.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must explicitly entail expansion of collateral values when this branch is used.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Collateral values expand.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must explicitly entail expansion of promotion systems when this branch is used.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "Promotion systems expand.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must explicitly entail expansion of budget allocations when this branch is used.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "Budget allocations expand.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must assign the prior appreciation to an asset when an asset branch is used.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The prior marked rise belongs to an asset.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must assign the prior appreciation to a claim when a claim branch is used.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "The prior marked rise belongs to a claim.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}], "predicate": "Credit, leverage, collateral values, promotion systems, or budget allocations expand because a marked-up asset or claim has already risen.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A prior rise in a marked asset or claim causes credit, leverage, collateral values, promotion systems, or budget allocations to expand.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P053-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A bubble may be driven by unlevered entrant beliefs and need not expand credit, collateral, or budgets.", "slug": "speculative_bubble"}], "residual_id": "r:fundamental_anchor_bubble_damping:b030_a05_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b030_a05_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Credit, leverage, collateral values, promotion systems, or budget allocations expand because the marked-up asset or claim has already risen. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Credit, leverage, collateral values, promotion systems, or budget allocations expand because the marked-up asset or claim has already risen."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A downside accelerator instance preserves the DSA while reversing the unit, which is why the explicit upside-branch selector is necessary and sufficient.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Financial Accelerator", "one_liner": "The credit-market feedback loop by which a modest shock is amplified — falling asset prices erode collateral, raising the external-finance premium, which cuts investment and depresses prices further — its whole strength read off one elasticity: the premium's sensitivity to borrower net worth.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:financial_accelerator", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1", "O2", "O5"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "financial_accelerator_upside_collateral_branch", "predicate": "The financial accelerator is operating on its rising-asset-price collateral-expansion branch.", "rationale": "The exact structural spine plus one anchored atomic context guard necessarily entails a complete DNF branch."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "financial_accelerator"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "financial_accelerator_upside_collateral_branch"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "financial_accelerator", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P053-C03-U1", "why_it_fits": "The DSA names both directional branches; one atomic selector yields the source's asset-rise-to-collateral-value-expansion branch."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Credit, leverage, collateral, promotion, or budgets expand because the marked quantity has risen.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P053-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include privately held doubts by participants, not only external criticism or lack of information.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Participants privately hold doubts about the prevailing position or course.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail suppression, withholding, or concealment of the doubts; open dissent does not satisfy this obligation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Participants suppress rather than openly express those private doubts.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the causal chain from costly dissent to suppression, not merely associate conformity with private doubt.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The cost imposed on dissent causes the suppression of private doubts.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must explicitly entail public momentum as the source of dissent cost for this branch.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Public momentum makes dissent costly.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must explicitly entail leader endorsement as the source of dissent cost for this branch.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Leader endorsement makes dissent costly.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must explicitly entail social proof as the source of dissent cost for this branch.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "Social proof makes dissent costly.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must explicitly entail reputational pressure as the source of dissent cost for this branch.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "Reputational pressure makes dissent costly.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Participants suppress private doubts because public momentum, leader endorsement, social proof, or reputational pressure makes dissent costly.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A social or reputational force makes dissent costly and thereby causes participants to suppress private doubts.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P053-C04-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A bubble can persist among openly skeptical rational riders without preference falsification or costly dissent.", "slug": "speculative_bubble"}], "residual_id": "r:fundamental_anchor_bubble_damping:b030_a05_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b030_a05_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Participants suppress private doubts because public momentum, leader endorsement, social proof, or reputational pressure makes dissent costly. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Participants suppress private doubts because public momentum, leader endorsement, social proof, or reputational pressure makes dissent costly."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A bubble can persist among openly skeptical rational riders without preference falsification or costly dissent.", "slug": "speculative_bubble"}], "normalized_requirement": "Participants suppress private doubts because momentum, endorsement, social proof, or reputation makes dissent costly.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Participants suppress private doubts because momentum, endorsement, social proof, or reputation makes dissent costly.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The greater-fool mechanism makes expected resale dominate the sustainable value anchor.", "role_mapping": "Exit assumption -> marginal entrant inflow; use value -> fundamental anchor.", "slug": "speculative_bubble", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b030_a05_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Exit liquidity, risk transfer, or resale assumptions matter more than long-run use value or service capacity. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Exit liquidity, risk transfer, or resale assumptions matter more than long-run use value or service capacity."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Speculative Bubble", "one_liner": "Self-reinforcing price rise detached from fundamental value.", "page_ref": "prime:speculative_bubble", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Exit assumption -> marginal entrant inflow; use value -> fundamental anchor.", "slug": "speculative_bubble", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The greater-fool mechanism makes expected resale dominate the sustainable value anchor."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Exit liquidity, risk transfer, or resale assumptions dominate long-run use value or service capacity.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P053-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern pre-existing stabilizing controls, not a new control that has never been used.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The affected controls are stabilizers or safeguards that were previously operative.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail reduced force or application of the stabilizers; unchanged or strengthened safeguards do not satisfy it.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Those prior stabilizers are loosened, weakened, relaxed, or bypassed.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail that a this-time-is-different or equivalent exceptionalist rationale drives the weakening.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Reasoning that the present case is exceptional causes the loosening.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Previously operative stabilizers are loosened because exceptionalist reasoning asserts that this time is different.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An exceptionalist claim causes previously operative stabilizers to be loosened.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P053-C05-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A bubble can form despite unchanged safeguards and without a this-time-is-different claim.", "slug": "speculative_bubble"}], "residual_id": "r:fundamental_anchor_bubble_damping:b030_a05_c7", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b030_a05_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Previous stabilizers such as margin, due diligence, peer review, valuation discipline, or capacity checks have been loosened because “this time is different.” The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Previous stabilizers such as margin, due diligence, peer review, valuation discipline, or capacity checks have been loosened because “this time is different.”"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A bubble can form despite unchanged safeguards and without a this-time-is-different claim.", "slug": "speculative_bubble"}], "normalized_requirement": "Margin, diligence, review, valuation discipline, or capacity checks were loosened under exceptionalist reasoning.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Margin, diligence, review, valuation discipline, or capacity checks were loosened under exceptionalist reasoning.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The system has low friction, fast diffusion, high narrative salience, and weak mechanisms for independent valuation.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The system has low friction, fast diffusion, high narrative salience, and weak mechanisms for independent valuation. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The system has low friction, fast diffusion, high narrative salience, and weak mechanisms for independent valuation."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The system has low friction, fast diffusion, high narrative salience, and weak mechanisms for independent valuation."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 30, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-030", "ledger_sha256": "714f2e058f938d9ad32f7100b9598868b07671a43abb1e866620c2ddeda9b309"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Funnel Attrition Localization", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:funnel_attrition_localization", "slug": "funnel_attrition_localization"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "An ordered sequence produces weak final yield, but the loss is observed only as an endpoint or aggregate deficit. Without stage-localized accounting, teams guess at causes, optimize the wrong transition, compare incompatible denominators, or miss the stage that actually constrains final yield.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "An ordered sequence produces weak final yield, but the loss is observed only as an endpoint or aggregate deficit. Without stage-localized accounting, teams guess at causes, optimize the wrong transition, compare incompatible denominators, or miss the stage that actually constrains final yield."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "An ordered filtering sequence carrying an input cohort toward a terminal outcome is mandatory.", "role_mapping": "Population -> input cohort; ordered stages -> stage sequence.", "slug": "funnel_analysis", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b030_a06_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A population, item stream, case set, lead pool, cohort, material flow, or transformation passes through ordered stages before the desired outcome appears. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A population, item stream, case set, lead pool, cohort, material flow, or transformation passes through ordered stages before the desired outcome appears."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Funnel Analysis", "one_liner": "Reading per-stage attrition across an ordered sequence to localize where a population is lost and which stage binds the final yield.", "page_ref": "prime:funnel_analysis", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Population -> input cohort; ordered stages -> stage sequence.", "slug": "funnel_analysis", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "An ordered filtering sequence carrying an input cohort toward a terminal outcome is mandatory."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A population or item stream passes through ordered stages before a desired outcome.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Funnel analysis can characterize a high-performing funnel without an external expectation being violated.", "slug": "funnel_analysis"}], "residual_id": "r:funnel_attrition_localization:b030_a06_c2", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b030_a06_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Final yield, completion, conversion, retention, throughput, or quality is lower than expected. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Final yield, completion, conversion, retention, throughput, or quality is lower than expected."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Funnel analysis can characterize a high-performing funnel without an external expectation being violated.", "slug": "funnel_analysis"}], "normalized_requirement": "Final yield, conversion, retention, throughput, or quality is lower than expected.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Final yield, conversion, retention, throughput, or quality is lower than expected.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Per-stage conditional conversions require observable stage boundaries and transition counts.", "role_mapping": "Entry and exit events -> conditional conversion measurement.", "slug": "funnel_analysis", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b030_a06_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The team can observe or instrument stage entry, stage exit, failure, abandonment, reentry, or transition events. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The team can observe or instrument stage entry, stage exit, failure, abandonment, reentry, or transition events."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Funnel Analysis", "one_liner": "Reading per-stage attrition across an ordered sequence to localize where a population is lost and which stage binds the final yield.", "page_ref": "prime:funnel_analysis", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Entry and exit events -> conditional conversion measurement.", "slug": "funnel_analysis", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Per-stage conditional conversions require observable stage boundaries and transition counts."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Stage entry, exit, failure, abandonment, reentry, or transition events are observable or instrumentable.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P053-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern a stage-localized improvement within a larger ordered sequence.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An improvement is local to one stage of an ordered funnel or sequence.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the possibility modality and must not require every local improvement to relocate loss.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The local improvement may relocate loss rather than necessarily doing so.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail downstream relocation of attrition, not merely a different local loss rate or genuine net removal.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Loss is moved to a downstream stage rather than removed from the whole sequence.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail whole-sequence remeasurement as the relevant check on whether loss was only displaced.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Remeasuring the whole sequence is needed to distinguish local apparent improvement from net improvement.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Without remeasuring the whole funnel, a local improvement may merely relocate loss to a downstream stage.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A local stage improvement can relocate rather than remove attrition, which whole-sequence remeasurement is needed to distinguish.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P053-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact diagnostic localizes current loss but does not require an intervention to relocate it downstream.", "slug": "funnel_analysis"}], "residual_id": "r:funnel_attrition_localization:b030_a06_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b030_a06_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A local improvement may simply move the loss downstream unless the whole funnel is remeasured. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A local improvement may simply move the loss downstream unless the whole funnel is remeasured."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact diagnostic localizes current loss but does not require an intervention to relocate it downstream.", "slug": "funnel_analysis"}], "normalized_requirement": "A local stage improvement can move attrition downstream unless the whole sequence is remeasured.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A local stage improvement can move attrition downstream unless the whole sequence is remeasured.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Losses may occur at different stages for different cohorts, segments, channels, or time windows.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Losses may occur at different stages for different cohorts, segments, channels, or time windows. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Losses may occur at different stages for different cohorts, segments, channels, or time windows."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Losses may occur at different stages for different cohorts, segments, channels, or time windows."}, {"display_text": "Stakeholders disagree about whether the binding problem is awareness, entry, qualification, activation, handoff, capacity, eligibility, friction, follow-through, or downstream quality.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Stakeholders disagree about whether the binding problem is awareness, entry, qualification, activation, handoff, capacity, eligibility, friction, follow-through, or downstream quality. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders disagree about whether the binding problem is awareness, entry, qualification, activation, handoff, capacity, eligibility, friction, follow-through, or downstream quality."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Stakeholders disagree about whether the binding problem is awareness, entry, qualification, activation, handoff, capacity, eligibility, friction, follow-through, or downstream quality."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 30, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-030", "ledger_sha256": "714f2e058f938d9ad32f7100b9598868b07671a43abb1e866620c2ddeda9b309"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Futures Literacy Capacity Building", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:futures_literacy_capacity_building", "slug": "futures_literacy_capacity_building"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 5, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 5, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 5 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a capability gap. The group may possess information about change, but it lacks the practical skill of using futures to challenge assumptions and expand present choices. As a result, it can become trapped in present bias, false certainty, fatalism, narrow scenarios, or performative workshops.\n\nThe root tension is that future thinking must remain imaginative enough to loosen assumptions and disciplined enough to affect action. Too little structure becomes vague speculation. Too much structure becomes prediction, planning templates, or expert reports.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A group lacks the skill to reason with uncertainty and possibility, causing narrow forecasts, present bias, fatalism, rigid plans, or futures exercises that do not change present action."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P053-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail fixation on a single expected trajectory, not merely preference among several acknowledged possibilities.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The framing privileges one expected future trajectory rather than multiple possibilities.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail speech or equivalent communicative framing of the trajectory as privileged; action alone cannot satisfy this obligation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "People speak about the future as if the branch-specific privileged status applies to that trajectory.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must explicitly entail fixedness of the expected trajectory for this branch.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The trajectory is framed as fixed.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must explicitly entail inevitability of the expected trajectory for this branch.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The trajectory is framed as inevitable.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail exclusion of other trajectories from practical action-planning for this branch.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The trajectory is framed as the only practical basis for action.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "People speak about the future as if one expected trajectory is fixed, inevitable, or the only practical basis for action.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "People speak about the future as if one expected trajectory has an exclusive or unavoidable status.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P053-C08-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Futures literacy is the positive capacity to surface and shift anticipatory assumptions and does not entail prior fixation on one trajectory.", "slug": "futures_literacy"}], "residual_id": "r:futures_literacy_capacity_building:b030_a07_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b030_a07_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: People speak about the future as if one expected trajectory is fixed, inevitable, or the only practical basis for action. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["People speak about the future as if one expected trajectory is fixed, inevitable, or the only practical basis for action."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Futures literacy is the positive capacity to surface and shift anticipatory assumptions and does not entail prior fixation on one trajectory.", "slug": "futures_literacy"}], "normalized_requirement": "People treat one expected future trajectory as fixed, inevitable, or uniquely practical.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "People treat one expected future trajectory as fixed, inevitable, or uniquely practical.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P053-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include a group that already has a foresight artifact, not merely a group with no future-oriented material.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A group possesses at least one foresight artifact.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail absence of the reflexive assumption-questioning capability despite artifact possession.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The group lacks know-how to use that artifact to question assumptions.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include a trend report as the possessed artifact for this branch.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The possessed foresight artifact is a trend report.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include a scenario as the possessed artifact for this branch.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The possessed foresight artifact is a scenario.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include a vision as the possessed artifact for this branch.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The possessed foresight artifact is a vision.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "A group has a trend report, scenario, or vision but does not know how to use it to question assumptions.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A group possesses a foresight artifact but lacks the capability to use it to question assumptions.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P053-C09-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P053-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include a group that already has a foresight artifact, not merely a group with no future-oriented material.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A group possesses at least one foresight artifact.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail absence of decision-changing use capability despite possession of the foresight artifact.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The group lacks know-how to use that artifact to change decisions.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include a trend report as the possessed artifact for this branch.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The possessed foresight artifact is a trend report.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include a scenario as the possessed artifact for this branch.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The possessed foresight artifact is a scenario.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include a vision as the possessed artifact for this branch.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The possessed foresight artifact is a vision.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "A group has a trend report, scenario, or vision but does not know how to use it to change decisions.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A group possesses a foresight artifact but lacks the capability to use it to change decisions.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P053-C09-U2"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact capacity includes using future images reflexively; inability to do so is its inverse.", "slug": "futures_literacy"}], "residual_id": "r:futures_literacy_capacity_building:b030_a07_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b030_a07_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A group has trend reports, scenarios, or visions but does not know how to use them to question assumptions or change decisions. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A group has trend reports, scenarios, or visions but does not know how to use them to question assumptions or change decisions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 2, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 2}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact capacity includes using future images reflexively; inability to do so is its inverse.", "slug": "futures_literacy"}], "normalized_requirement": "A group has scenarios or visions but cannot use them to question assumptions or change decisions.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 2 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A group has scenarios or visions but cannot use them to question assumptions or change decisions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A futures-literate group can work productively with uncertainty and need not exhibit these reactions.", "slug": "futures_literacy"}], "residual_id": "r:futures_literacy_capacity_building:b030_a07_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b030_a07_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Uncertainty creates paralysis, false certainty, cynicism, or over-attachment to one forecast. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Uncertainty creates paralysis, false certainty, cynicism, or over-attachment to one forecast."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A futures-literate group can work productively with uncertainty and need not exhibit these reactions.", "slug": "futures_literacy"}], "normalized_requirement": "Uncertainty produces paralysis, false certainty, cynicism, or attachment to one forecast.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Uncertainty produces paralysis, false certainty, cynicism, or attachment to one forecast.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P053-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern participants' strategic or future-oriented imagination, not risk reporting in an unrelated operational domain.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Participants exercise strategic imagination about the future.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the positive capacity to identify risks rather than describing total inability to reason about the future.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Participants can name risks.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail absence of the ability to name alternative futures or courses.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Participants cannot name alternatives.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail absence of the ability to name available options.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Participants cannot name options.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail absence of choice-dependent future images that preserve participant agency.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Participants cannot name futures that depend on choices.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the asymmetric contrast; generic narrow imagination without this risk-versus-possibility pattern is insufficient.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "Risk identification is present while possibility and option generation are absent.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Participants can name risks but cannot name alternatives, options, or choice-dependent futures.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Strategic imagination identifies risks while failing to generate alternative possibility or agency-bearing futures.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P053-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Alternative-image generation is part of futures literacy, so the described absence is an inverse failure state.", "slug": "futures_literacy"}], "residual_id": "r:futures_literacy_capacity_building:b030_a07_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b030_a07_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Strategic imagination is narrow: participants can name risks but not alternatives, options, or choice-dependent futures. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Strategic imagination is narrow: participants can name risks but not alternatives, options, or choice-dependent futures."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Alternative-image generation is part of futures literacy, so the described absence is an inverse failure state.", "slug": "futures_literacy"}], "normalized_requirement": "Strategic imagination names risks but not alternatives, options, or choice-dependent futures.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Strategic imagination names risks but not alternatives, options, or choice-dependent futures.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B5", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P053-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail the presence of foresight outputs, not merely the absence of foresight work.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Foresight outputs already exist.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the concentration-versus-participant-distribution contrast for capability, not only unequal ownership of outputs.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Foresight capability is concentrated rather than distributed among participants.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must assign concentrated foresight capability to facilitators for this branch.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Facilitators are the concentrated holders of the capability.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must assign concentrated foresight capability to experts for this branch.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Experts are the concentrated holders of the capability.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}], "predicate": "Foresight outputs exist, but foresight capability remains concentrated in facilitators or experts rather than distributed among participants.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Produced foresight outputs coexist with specialist-concentrated rather than participant-distributed foresight capability.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P053-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Futures literacy may be held by an individual and does not require prior expert concentration or existing outputs.", "slug": "futures_literacy"}], "residual_id": "r:futures_literacy_capacity_building:b030_a07_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b030_a07_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Foresight outputs exist but capability remains concentrated in facilitators or experts rather than distributed among participants. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Foresight outputs exist but capability remains concentrated in facilitators or experts rather than distributed among participants."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Futures literacy may be held by an individual and does not require prior expert concentration or existing outputs.", "slug": "futures_literacy"}], "normalized_requirement": "Foresight outputs exist while capability remains concentrated in facilitators or experts.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Foresight outputs exist while capability remains concentrated in facilitators or experts.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 5", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "DISJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A community, classroom, organization, or governance body needs repeated practice using futures in dialogue and decision-making.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It fits classrooms, organizations, public agencies, communities, leadership programs, product teams, and governance bodies that repeatedly face future-sensitive choices. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: A community, classroom, organization, or governance body needs repeated practice using futures in dialogue and decision-making. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A community, classroom, organization, or governance body needs repeated practice using futures in dialogue and decision-making.", "It fits classrooms, organizations, public agencies, communities, leadership programs, product teams, and governance bodies that repeatedly face future-sensitive choices."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "A community, classroom, organization, or governance body needs repeated practice using futures in dialogue and decision-making."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 30, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-030", "ledger_sha256": "714f2e058f938d9ad32f7100b9598868b07671a43abb1e866620c2ddeda9b309"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Gateway Mediation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:gateway_mediation", "slug": "gateway_mediation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 2, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is uncontrolled or under-governed crossing. Many actors or flows need to move from one side of a boundary to another, but the receiving side cannot safely accept every crossing in raw form. The source side may use different assumptions, formats, credentials, languages, categories, or levels of completeness. The target side may have safety, privacy, jurisdictional, operational, or semantic constraints.\n\nWithout a gateway, every downstream recipient becomes its own improvised gate. That creates inconsistent decisions, duplicated checking, hidden workarounds, and unclear accountability. In the worst case, invalid or dangerous exchange reaches a protected domain while legitimate exchange is delayed or excluded because the crossing rules are unclear.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Multiple actors, systems, requests, flows, cases, or resources need to cross a boundary, but direct access creates risk, inconsistency, overload, illegibility, semantic mismatch, or uncontrolled exposure."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P053-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern direct boundary crossing or unmediated access, not exposure arising after authorized internal handling.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Access to the receiving side is direct or unmediated.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the would-expose consequence of granting direct access; a merely possible unrelated leak is insufficient.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Such direct access would cause exposure.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must explicitly entail exposure of internal structure for this branch.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The exposed object is internal structure.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must explicitly entail exposure of protected resources for this branch.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The exposed object is protected resources.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must explicitly entail exposure of sensitive people for this branch.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The exposed object is sensitive people.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must explicitly entail exposure of fragile systems for this branch.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The exposed object is fragile systems.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Direct access would expose internal structure, protected resources, sensitive people, or fragile systems.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Unmediated access across a boundary would expose a protected or vulnerable interior.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P053-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Containment may isolate a hazard with no legitimate incoming access demand or sensitive internal structure.", "slug": "containment"}], "residual_id": "r:gateway_mediation:b030_a08_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b030_a08_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use gateway mediation when a protected or specialized domain must accept outside interaction, but raw direct access would be too risky or costly. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Direct access would expose internal structure, protected resources, sensitive people, or fragile systems.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Direct access would expose internal structure, protected resources, sensitive people, or fragile systems.", "Use gateway mediation when a protected or specialized domain must accept outside interaction, but raw direct access would be too risky or costly."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Containment may isolate a hazard with no legitimate incoming access demand or sensitive internal structure.", "slug": "containment"}], "normalized_requirement": "Direct access would expose internal structure, protected resources, sensitive people, or fragile systems.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Direct access would expose internal structure, protected resources, sensitive people, or fragile systems.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P053-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must involve multiple sources; variation within only one source does not satisfy the comparison.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "At least two distinct sources are being compared.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail cross-source heterogeneity, not merely the existence of the named convention.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The sources differ from one another on the branch's named dimension.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must explicitly entail a cross-source format difference for this branch.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The differing dimension is format.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must explicitly entail a cross-source terminology difference for this branch.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The differing dimension is terminology.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must explicitly entail a cross-source permission difference for this branch.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The differing dimension is permission.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must explicitly entail a cross-source protocol difference for this branch.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The differing dimension is protocol.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must explicitly entail a cross-source norm difference for this branch.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The differing dimension is norm.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must explicitly entail a cross-source completeness-standard difference for this branch.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The differing dimension is completeness standard.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Sources differ in format, terminology, permission, protocol, norm, or completeness standard.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Multiple sources use heterogeneous exchange or representation conventions.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P053-C13-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Different conventions can be mutually accepted or translated already; heterogeneity alone does not entail an unsatisfied interface clause.", "slug": "interface_mismatch"}], "residual_id": "r:gateway_mediation:b030_a08_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b030_a08_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Different sources use different formats, terminology, permissions, protocols, norms, or completeness standards. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Different sources use different formats, terminology, permissions, protocols, norms, or completeness standards."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "One framing choice within one message would not compare sources, and a citation chain preserving every caveat would not differ in completeness. The exact record excludes both by requiring successive context-stripping venues.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Quote Laundering", "one_liner": "A provisional but accurate statement is cited across successive venues that each strip its caveats and scope, until it circulates as authoritative settled fact — a channel failure, not a false source, so it resists source correction and needs traceability instead.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:quote_laundering", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "quote_laundering"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "quote_laundering", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P053-C13-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every instance compares an original with downstream source representations and entails a difference in completeness standards for caveats and scope. O1, O2, and O8 form a direct branch."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Sources differ in format, terminology, permission, protocol, norm, or completeness.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P053-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must assign governance authority to the receiving side, not solely to the incoming actor.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The controller is the receiving side of a boundary crossing.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail a requirement for control, not merely that the receiver could optionally observe crossings.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The receiving side needs or must exercise crossing control.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include identity- or actor-based authorization for crossing.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Control determines who is permitted to cross.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include governance of the conditions attached to authorized crossing.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Control determines the conditions under which crossing is permitted.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include governance of the extent or scope of authorized crossing.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Control determines the scope within which crossing is permitted.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "The receiving side needs to control who can cross, under what conditions, and with what scope.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A receiving side must govern the identity, conditions, and scope of boundary crossing.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P053-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Access friction requires an entry-asymmetric cost shaping membership, not deliberate authorization and scope control.", "slug": "access_friction"}], "residual_id": "r:gateway_mediation:b030_a08_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b030_a08_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The receiving side needs to control who can cross, under what conditions, and with what scope. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The receiving side needs to control who can cross, under what conditions, and with what scope."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Access friction requires an entry-asymmetric cost shaping membership, not deliberate authorization and scope control.", "slug": "access_friction"}], "normalized_requirement": "The receiver must control who crosses, under what conditions, and within what scope.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The receiver must control who crosses, under what conditions, and within what scope.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Permeability selectively passes a carrier but need not preserve a protected governance boundary or distinguish legitimate exchange.", "slug": "permeability"}], "residual_id": "r:gateway_mediation:b030_a08_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b030_a08_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A boundary must remain intact, but legitimate exchange cannot be blocked entirely. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A boundary must remain intact, but legitimate exchange cannot be blocked entirely."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Permeability selectively passes a carrier but need not preserve a protected governance boundary or distinguish legitimate exchange.", "slug": "permeability"}], "normalized_requirement": "A boundary must remain intact while permitting legitimate exchange.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A boundary must remain intact while permitting legitimate exchange.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P053-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require many incoming interactions—a contextually high multiplicity—not merely any plurality or two isolated exchanges.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A contextually large number of interactions are entering the receiving system.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail convergence on a shared entry point rather than separate direct routes to each specialist.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The incoming interactions pass through one common front door or shared entry point.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail a requirement for the shared entry point in the stated routing arrangement.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The common front door is needed rather than merely optional.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the order from common entry to later specialized handling, not the reverse.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Passage through the common front door occurs before specialized downstream handling.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include subsequent specialized handling rather than only a generic reception point with no downstream differentiation.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Handling after the shared entry point is specialized and downstream.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Many incoming interactions need a common front door before specialized downstream handling.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Many incoming interactions must pass through a shared entry point before specialized downstream handling.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P053-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An encounter surface is stranger-inclusive and low barrier, not a controlled gateway routing interactions to specialized handlers.", "slug": "encounter_surface"}], "residual_id": "r:gateway_mediation:b030_a08_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b030_a08_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Many incoming interactions need a common front door before specialized downstream handling. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Many incoming interactions need a common front door before specialized downstream handling."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An encounter surface is stranger-inclusive and low barrier, not a controlled gateway routing interactions to specialized handlers.", "slug": "encounter_surface"}], "normalized_requirement": "Many incoming interactions require a common front door before specialized handling.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Many incoming interactions require a common front door before specialized handling.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P054-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must include a crossing event and a record specifically attached to that event.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A record corresponds to a boundary crossing.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The record must be necessary for the named concern, not merely useful or optional.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The branch-specific concern requires the crossing record.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A hidden or inaccessible record cannot satisfy the source's visible-record requirement.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The required crossing record is visible or inspectable.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires governance as the reason the record is needed.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Governance is the requirement ground.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires safety as the reason the record is needed.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Safety is the requirement ground.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires fairness as the reason the record is needed.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "Fairness is the requirement ground.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires accountability as the reason the record is needed.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "Accountability is the requirement ground.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Governance, safety, fairness, or accountability requires a visible crossing record.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A boundary crossing must leave a visible record when governance, safety, fairness, or accountability requires it.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P054-C01-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Accountability does not necessarily involve a boundary crossing or a visible gateway record.", "slug": "accountability"}], "residual_id": "r:gateway_mediation:b030_a08_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b030_a08_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Governance, safety, fairness, or accountability requires a visible crossing record. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Governance, safety, fairness, or accountability requires a visible crossing record."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Tried an instance with an intake surface but no public record; the exact record classifies that as no real responsiveness channel, so the source obligations cannot be falsified.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Responsiveness channel", "one_liner": "Turn vague openness to feedback into auditable accountability by requiring three co-occurring structures — a published intake surface, a documented response discipline, and a public decision log whose latency and rejection-with-reason rate anyone can read.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:responsiveness_channel", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "responsiveness_channel"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "responsiveness_channel", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P054-C01-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires requests to enter through a published intake surface and a public log that exposes receipt and disposition for accountability, satisfying the accountability DNF branch."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Governance, safety, fairness, or accountability requires a visible crossing record.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 30, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-030", "ledger_sha256": "714f2e058f938d9ad32f7100b9598868b07671a43abb1e866620c2ddeda9b309"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Generalization Validation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:generalization_validation", "slug": "generalization_validation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is over-adaptation to known evidence. A model, explanation, or rule is shaped by a set of cases. It then gets evaluated, praised, or scaled using those same cases or closely related cases. Because the pattern fits its origin so well, decision-makers mistake local fit for transferable truth.\n\nThis failure is not limited to statistics. A strategy team can overfit to a celebrated company case. A manager can overfit a performance explanation to one employee story. A policy group can overfit to a favorable pilot site. A product team can overfit to early adopters. In each case, the pattern becomes too responsive to the origin conditions and not responsive enough to the future target.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A pattern appears accurate, persuasive, or useful on the same cases used to create it, but the decision requires applying that pattern to new, future, external, or more varied cases where the apparent fit may not survive."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact pathology presupposes a candidate fitted to training or known cases.", "role_mapping": "Known cases -> training sample; fitted pattern -> model candidate.", "slug": "overfitting", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b030_a09_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "In each case, the pattern becomes too responsive to the origin conditions and not responsive enough to the future target. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A pattern has been fitted to a known case set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A pattern has been fitted to a known case set.", "In each case, the pattern becomes too responsive to the origin conditions and not responsive enough to the future target."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Overfitting", "one_liner": "Poor generalization.", "page_ref": "prime:overfitting", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Known cases -> training sample; fitted pattern -> model candidate.", "slug": "overfitting", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact pathology presupposes a candidate fitted to training or known cases."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A pattern has been fitted to a known case set.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Overfitting requires an in-sample versus out-of-sample performance gap, with fit to known data disproportionately strong.", "role_mapping": "Original fit -> in-sample performance; transport concern -> generalization gap.", "slug": "overfitting", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b030_a09_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Original-case fit is unusually strong or rhetorically compelling. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Original-case fit is unusually strong or rhetorically compelling."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Overfitting", "one_liner": "Poor generalization.", "page_ref": "prime:overfitting", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Original fit -> in-sample performance; transport concern -> generalization gap.", "slug": "overfitting", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Overfitting requires an in-sample versus out-of-sample performance gap, with fit to known data disproportionately strong."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Fit to the original cases is unusually strong or rhetorically compelling.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P054-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must require an episode of adding complexity, not merely a fixed high-capacity object.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Additional complexity is introduced into a pattern, model, or account.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The fit being rescued or improved must concern the cases used to create or tune the pattern.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The targeted fit is fit to the known or in-sample cases.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Added complexity must be directed at fit, not introduced for an unrelated capability.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The complexity is added for the purpose of changing fit.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires complexity added to recover or salvage fit.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The added complexity rescues otherwise inadequate fit.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires complexity added to increase the degree of fit.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The added complexity improves existing fit.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Additional complexity was added to rescue or improve in-sample fit.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Complexity is added to a pattern or model in order to rescue or improve its fit on the cases used to develop it.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P054-C02-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Overfitting can arise from a fixed high-capacity model without an episode of adding complexity to rescue fit.", "slug": "overfitting"}], "residual_id": "r:generalization_validation:b030_a09_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b030_a09_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Additional complexity has been added to rescue or improve fit. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Additional complexity has been added to rescue or improve fit."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Overfitting can arise from a fixed high-capacity model without an episode of adding complexity to rescue fit.", "slug": "overfitting"}], "normalized_requirement": "Additional complexity was added to rescue or improve in-sample fit.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Additional complexity was added to rescue or improve in-sample fit.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The pattern will guide action beyond the original cases.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when a decision depends on applying a learned pattern beyond the original evidence. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: The pattern will guide action beyond the original cases. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The pattern will guide action beyond the original cases.", "Use this archetype when a decision depends on applying a learned pattern beyond the original evidence."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "The pattern will guide action beyond the original cases."}, {"display_text": "Failure in new cases would be costly.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Failure in new cases would be costly. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Failure in new cases would be costly."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Failure in new cases would be costly."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 30, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-030", "ledger_sha256": "714f2e058f938d9ad32f7100b9598868b07671a43abb1e866620c2ddeda9b309"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Generate-and-Verify Separation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:generate_and_verify_separation", "slug": "generate_and_verify_separation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Finding a satisfactory solution, proof, plan, design, computation, or artifact is expensive because the search space is large, creativity or domain expertise is required, the generator is opaque, or computation is outsourced. Yet organizations often respond by trusting a small set of generators, redoing the expensive work during review, or accepting outputs on reputation. When candidate validity can instead be checked much more cheaply, failing to separate generation from verification wastes the asymmetry: search remains centralized, untrusted contributors cannot participate safely, and the acceptance decision inherits the generator’s complexity and trust requirements.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Finding a satisfactory solution, proof, plan, design, computation, or artifact is expensive because the search space is large, creativity or domain expertise is required, the generator is opaque, or computation is outsourced. Yet organizations often respond by trusting a small set of generators, redoing the expensive work during review, or accepting outputs on reputation. When candidate validity can instead be checked much more cheaply, failing to separate generation from verification wastes the asymmetry: search remains centralized, untrusted contributors cannot participate safely, and the acceptance decision inherits the generator’s complexity and trust requirements."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime requires a qualitatively high cost of finding a candidate from scratch.", "role_mapping": "Candidate generation -> finding operation; expensive reproduction -> finding cost.", "slug": "verifier_prover_asymmetry", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b030_a10_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Candidate generation is combinatorial, creative, heuristic, proprietary, remote, or otherwise expensive to reproduce. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Candidate generation is combinatorial, creative, heuristic, proprietary, remote, or otherwise expensive to reproduce."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Verifier-Prover Asymmetry", "one_liner": "Verifying a candidate solution is qualitatively cheaper than finding one, and the cost-ratio supports a characteristic class of designs that split finding from checking.", "page_ref": "prime:verifier_prover_asymmetry", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Candidate generation -> finding operation; expensive reproduction -> finding cost.", "slug": "verifier_prover_asymmetry", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime requires a qualitatively high cost of finding a candidate from scratch."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Candidate generation is creative, combinatorial, heuristic, remote, proprietary, or expensive to reproduce.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A verification operation on the same candidate against a specification is mandatory.", "role_mapping": "Stable relation -> checking predicate; candidate and evidence -> object supplied to verifier.", "slug": "verifier_prover_asymmetry", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b030_a10_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: At least one decision-relevant property can be expressed as a stable checkable relation over the instance, candidate, and bounded evidence. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["At least one decision-relevant property can be expressed as a stable checkable relation over the instance, candidate, and bounded evidence."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Verifier-Prover Asymmetry", "one_liner": "Verifying a candidate solution is qualitatively cheaper than finding one, and the cost-ratio supports a characteristic class of designs that split finding from checking.", "page_ref": "prime:verifier_prover_asymmetry", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Stable relation -> checking predicate; candidate and evidence -> object supplied to verifier.", "slug": "verifier_prover_asymmetry", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A verification operation on the same candidate against a specification is mandatory."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A decision-relevant property can be expressed as a stable checkable relation over candidate and bounded evidence.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact asymmetry is the qualitative cost gap between checking a supplied candidate and finding it from scratch.", "role_mapping": "Supplied evidence -> verification input; reconstruction -> finding from scratch.", "slug": "verifier_prover_asymmetry", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b030_a10_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A witness, proof, trace, schedule, bound, test oracle, or replay record can make checking cheaper than reconstruction. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A witness, proof, trace, schedule, bound, test oracle, or replay record can make checking cheaper than reconstruction."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Verifier-Prover Asymmetry", "one_liner": "Verifying a candidate solution is qualitatively cheaper than finding one, and the cost-ratio supports a characteristic class of designs that split finding from checking.", "page_ref": "prime:verifier_prover_asymmetry", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Supplied evidence -> verification input; reconstruction -> finding from scratch.", "slug": "verifier_prover_asymmetry", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact asymmetry is the qualitative cost gap between checking a supplied candidate and finding it from scratch."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A witness, proof, trace, schedule, bound, oracle, or replay record can make checking cheaper than reconstruction.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Outsourcing finding to many agents while centralizing independent checking is an explicit design license of the exact pattern.", "role_mapping": "Parallel generators -> distributed finding; trust-independent acceptance -> centralized verification.", "slug": "verifier_prover_asymmetry", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b030_a10_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Multiple generators, solvers, teams, models, or adversarial participants could search in parallel if acceptance did not depend on trusting them. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Multiple generators, solvers, teams, models, or adversarial participants could search in parallel if acceptance did not depend on trusting them."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Verifier-Prover Asymmetry", "one_liner": "Verifying a candidate solution is qualitatively cheaper than finding one, and the cost-ratio supports a characteristic class of designs that split finding from checking.", "page_ref": "prime:verifier_prover_asymmetry", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Parallel generators -> distributed finding; trust-independent acceptance -> centralized verification.", "slug": "verifier_prover_asymmetry", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Outsourcing finding to many agents while centralizing independent checking is an explicit design license of the exact pattern."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Multiple generators could search in parallel if acceptance did not require trusting their internals.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P054-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must distinguish the system deciding acceptance from the system producing candidates.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An authoritative acceptance path is distinct from the generation stack.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The expression must preserve feasible design rather than require that the smaller path already exists.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The acceptance path can be made to have the stated properties.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must entail the directed size comparison against generation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The acceptance path can be smaller than the generation stack.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must entail the directed inspectability comparison against generation.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The acceptance path can be more inspectable than the generation stack.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The comparative path must control acceptance rather than serve as a non-authoritative advisory check.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The smaller and more inspectable path is authoritative for acceptance.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "The authoritative acceptance path can be made smaller and more inspectable than the generation stack.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An authoritative acceptance path can be made both smaller and more inspectable than the generation stack.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P054-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Cheaper verification need not be implemented by a smaller or more inspectable system.", "slug": "verifier_prover_asymmetry"}], "residual_id": "r:generate_and_verify_separation:b030_a10_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b030_a10_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The authoritative acceptance path can be made smaller and more inspectable than the generation stack. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The authoritative acceptance path can be made smaller and more inspectable than the generation stack."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Cheaper verification need not be implemented by a smaller or more inspectable system.", "slug": "verifier_prover_asymmetry"}], "normalized_requirement": "The authoritative acceptance path can be smaller and more inspectable than the generation stack.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The authoritative acceptance path can be smaller and more inspectable than the generation stack.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P054-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must require constrained review capacity, not merely a choice made under abundant capacity.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Available review capacity is scarce.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The allocation must be an existing practice rather than only a future risk.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The scarce capacity is currently allocated to review activity.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must entail redundant regeneration during review.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Reviewers spend the capacity repeating the candidate-generation work.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The expression must preserve the allocation contrast with direct checking of explicit candidate claims.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Repeated generation displaces checking explicit claims.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Scarce review capacity is currently spent repeating generation rather than checking explicit claims.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Scarce review capacity is allocated to repeating generation instead of checking explicit candidate claims.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P054-C05-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The asymmetry does not require an existing review process or current waste through repeated generation.", "slug": "verifier_prover_asymmetry"}], "residual_id": "r:generate_and_verify_separation:b030_a10_c7", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b030_a10_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Review capacity is scarce and is currently spent repeating generation rather than checking explicit claims. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Review capacity is scarce and is currently spent repeating generation rather than checking explicit claims."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The asymmetry does not require an existing review process or current waste through repeated generation.", "slug": "verifier_prover_asymmetry"}], "normalized_requirement": "Scarce review capacity is spent repeating generation rather than checking explicit claims.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Scarce review capacity is spent repeating generation rather than checking explicit claims.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Candidate outputs cross a privilege, organizational, deployment, payment, publication, or consensus boundary.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Candidate outputs cross a privilege, organizational, deployment, payment, publication, or consensus boundary. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Candidate outputs cross a privilege, organizational, deployment, payment, publication, or consensus boundary."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Candidate outputs cross a privilege, organizational, deployment, payment, publication, or consensus boundary."}, {"display_text": "A deterministic or bounded-error verdict can be recorded and replayed for audit.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: A deterministic or bounded-error verdict can be recorded and replayed for audit. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A deterministic or bounded-error verdict can be recorded and replayed for audit."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 8, "text": "A deterministic or bounded-error verdict can be recorded and replayed for audit."}, {"display_text": "The distinction between feasibility, optimality, safety, authenticity, and operational validity can be made explicit.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: The distinction between feasibility, optimality, safety, authenticity, and operational validity can be made explicit. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [9], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The distinction between feasibility, optimality, safety, authenticity, and operational validity can be made explicit."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 9, "text": "The distinction between feasibility, optimality, safety, authenticity, and operational validity can be made explicit."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 30, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-030", "ledger_sha256": "714f2e058f938d9ad32f7100b9598868b07671a43abb1e866620c2ddeda9b309"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": [{"groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "No complete Synthetic Media Laundering plus guard instance preserves the selected DNF branch while falsifying an obligation.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Synthetic Media Laundering", "one_liner": "The information-ecosystem failure in which algorithmically generated content enters an evidence channel past an unscrutinized intake node and is progressively washed through authenticating intermediaries until downstream consumers treat it as verified-provenance reality.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:synthetic_media_laundering", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O7"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "evidence_channel_is_publication_channel", "predicate": "The evidence channel receiving the synthetic artifact is a publication channel.", "rationale": "Independent SSD review confirms that the exact record and the single atomic candidate-anchored qualifier necessarily entail one complete DNF branch without role, polarity, scope, or modality laundering."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "synthetic_media_laundering"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "evidence_channel_is_publication_channel"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "synthetic_media_laundering", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P054-C04-U1", "why_it_fits": "Generated artifact already enters an authenticating channel; one named channel restriction completes the publication branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Tried an instance where protected content remained within the privilege envelope; it would not be data extraction through prompting, so the privilege branch remains necessary.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Data Extraction Through Prompting", "one_liner": "The AI-security failure mode in which an adversary crafts inputs that make a deployed language model emit private content — training text, system prompts, retrieved documents — by exploiting the legitimate inference interface, whose breadth exceeds the access-control envelope around the data.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:data_extraction_through_prompting", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "data_extraction_through_prompting"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "data_extraction_through_prompting", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P054-C04-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every exact-record instance generates an output through the sanctioned interface that carries protected content beyond the operator's access-control envelope."}], "publication_role": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT_ONLY", "source_residual_occurrence_id": "r:generate_and_verify_separation:b030_a10_c6", "unit": {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P054-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must apply to a generated candidate or its output, not an arbitrary boundary crossing.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The crossing object is a candidate output produced by generation.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The output must actually pass across the named boundary rather than merely approach it.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The candidate output crosses the branch-specific boundary.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a privilege boundary.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The crossed boundary concerns privilege.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires an organizational boundary.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The crossed boundary is organizational.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a deployment boundary.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The crossed boundary concerns deployment.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a payment boundary.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The crossed boundary concerns payment.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a publication boundary.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The crossed boundary concerns publication.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a consensus boundary.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The crossed boundary concerns consensus.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Candidate outputs cross a privilege, organizational, deployment, payment, publication, or consensus boundary.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A generated candidate output crosses a consequential boundary.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P054-C04-U1"}}]}
{"archetype": {"name": "Generated Span Closure Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:generated_span_closure_design", "slug": "generated_span_closure_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 7 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 7}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system claims that a set of primitives, features, moves, axioms, resources, or generators can produce a broader capability or expression space, but the generator set, admissible operations, closure conditions, membership evidence, or approximation bounds are implicit.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system claims that a set of primitives, features, moves, axioms, resources, or generators can produce a broader capability or expression space, but the generator set, admissible operations, closure conditions, membership evidence, or approximation bounds are implicit."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A span need not be large relative to its primitive set, and its generators need not be described as small.", "slug": "span"}], "residual_id": "r:generated_span_closure_design:b030_a11_c1", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b030_a11_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system claims that a set of primitives, features, moves, axioms, resources, or generators can produce a broader capability or expression space, but the generator set, admissible operations, closure conditions, membership evidence, or approximation bounds are implicit. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A small primitive set is expected to generate many possible expressions, behaviors, vectors, configurations, plans, or designs.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A small primitive set is expected to generate many possible expressions, behaviors, vectors, configurations, plans, or designs.", "A system claims that a set of primitives, features, moves, axioms, resources, or generators can produce a broader capability or expression space, but the generator set, admissible operations, closure conditions, membership evidence, or approximation bounds are implicit."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A span need not be large relative to its primitive set, and its generators need not be described as small.", "slug": "span"}], "normalized_requirement": "A small primitive set is expected to generate many possible expressions, behaviors, vectors, configurations, plans, or designs.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A small primitive set is expected to generate many possible expressions, behaviors, vectors, configurations, plans, or designs.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact gap-to-target diagnostic asks whether a target is reachable under the generator grammar.", "role_mapping": "Target item -> desired capability; reachable -> membership in generated closure.", "slug": "span", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b030_a11_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Downstream decisions depend on whether a target item is reachable from available generators. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Downstream decisions depend on whether a target item is reachable from available generators."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Span", "one_liner": "The complete set reachable by combining primitives under admissible operations.", "page_ref": "prime:span", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Target item -> desired capability; reachable -> membership in generated closure.", "slug": "span", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact gap-to-target diagnostic asks whether a target is reachable under the generator grammar."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A downstream decision depends on whether a target is reachable from the available generators.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A basis is already spanning and independent, so it entails neither incompleteness nor redundancy.", "slug": "basis"}], "residual_id": "r:generated_span_closure_design:b030_a11_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b030_a11_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system claims that a set of primitives, features, moves, axioms, resources, or generators can produce a broader capability or expression space, but the generator set, admissible operations, closure conditions, membership evidence, or approximation bounds are implicit. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A candidate basis, vocabulary, API, move set, feature set, or resource pool may be incomplete or redundant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A candidate basis, vocabulary, API, move set, feature set, or resource pool may be incomplete or redundant.", "A system claims that a set of primitives, features, moves, axioms, resources, or generators can produce a broader capability or expression space, but the generator set, admissible operations, closure conditions, membership evidence, or approximation bounds are implicit."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A basis is already spanning and independent, so it entails neither incompleteness nor redundancy.", "slug": "basis"}], "normalized_requirement": "A candidate basis, vocabulary, API, move set, feature set, or resource pool may be incomplete or redundant.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A candidate basis, vocabulary, API, move set, feature set, or resource pool may be incomplete or redundant.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P054-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must concern a generated possibility or expression space, not an unrelated large collection.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The subject is a space produced by generators or generative operations.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Approximation must be required by the space's scale, not merely offered as an optional convenience.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The generated space must be represented through approximation.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must preserve acknowledged incompleteness and reject false completeness.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The approximation is not claimed or represented as complete.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires an infinite generated space.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The generated space is infinite.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a contextually very large generated space.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The generated space is very large.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}], "predicate": "An infinite or very large generated space must be approximated without claiming completeness.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An infinite or very large generated space requires an approximation that is not represented as complete.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P054-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A span may be finite and exactly enumerable; approximation is not mandatory.", "slug": "span"}], "residual_id": "r:generated_span_closure_design:b030_a11_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b030_a11_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: An infinite or very large generated space must be approximated without pretending the approximation is complete. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["An infinite or very large generated space must be approximated without pretending the approximation is complete."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A finite exhaustible generator would not satisfy the chosen branch, but under an infinite input class a finite sampling run cannot be complete.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Property-Based Testing", "one_liner": "State an invariant that must hold for all inputs of a class and let a framework generate many samples, check each, and shrink any failure to a minimal counter-example — replacing hand-picked examples with systematic search over an input space.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:property_based_testing", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2", "O4"], "guard_type": "QUANTIFIER_BINDING", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "generator_input_class_is_infinite", "predicate": "The generator's input class is infinite.", "rationale": "Independent SSD review confirms that the exact record and the single atomic candidate-anchored qualifier necessarily entail one complete DNF branch without role, polarity, scope, or modality laundering."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "property_based_testing"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "generator_input_class_is_infinite"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "property_based_testing", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P054-C06-U1", "why_it_fits": "Property-based testing supplies generated sampling and the explicit non-proof limit; infinitude is the sole missing condition making approximation required."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "No complete Search Algorithm plus guard instance preserves the selected DNF branch while falsifying an obligation.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Search Algorithm", "one_liner": "Solve a problem by casting it as a state space explored with a frontier-ordering strategy, so completeness, optimality, and cost are read off the strategy's name — and an admissible heuristic buys a narrower search without sacrificing the optimal answer.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:search_algorithm", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2", "O3"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "exploration_uses_local_search_escape", "predicate": "The exploration uses the candidate's named local-search escape rather than a completeness-guaranteeing frontier strategy.", "rationale": "Independent SSD review confirms that the exact record and the single atomic candidate-anchored qualifier necessarily entail one complete DNF branch without role, polarity, scope, or modality laundering."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "search_algorithm"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "exploration_uses_local_search_escape"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "search_algorithm", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P054-C06-U1", "why_it_fits": "The generated state space is too large; selecting the named local-search escape yields incomplete approximation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "An infinite or very large generated space must be approximated without claiming completeness.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Change-of-basis equivalence and differing generated closures are explicit diagnostics of the exact prime.", "role_mapping": "Generator sets -> primitive sets; same or different envelope -> equality or inequality of spans.", "slug": "span", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b030_a11_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Different generator sets might produce the same span or produce materially different reachability envelopes. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Different generator sets might produce the same span or produce materially different reachability envelopes."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Span", "one_liner": "The complete set reachable by combining primitives under admissible operations.", "page_ref": "prime:span", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Generator sets -> primitive sets; same or different envelope -> equality or inequality of spans.", "slug": "span", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Change-of-basis equivalence and differing generated closures are explicit diagnostics of the exact prime."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Different generator sets can produce the same span or materially different reachability envelopes.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact pattern diagnoses in-span targets by construction and outside-span gaps by missing primitives or operations.", "role_mapping": "Membership claim -> reachability; constructive evidence -> admissible combination.", "slug": "span", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b030_a11_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Membership, expressiveness, completeness, or coverage claims need constructive evidence. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Membership, expressiveness, completeness, or coverage claims need constructive evidence."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Span", "one_liner": "The complete set reachable by combining primitives under admissible operations.", "page_ref": "prime:span", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Membership claim -> reachability; constructive evidence -> admissible combination.", "slug": "span", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact pattern diagnoses in-span targets by construction and outside-span gaps by missing primitives or operations."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Membership, expressiveness, completeness, or coverage claims require constructive evidence.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Span requires an admissible grammar and closure but need not produce invalid, duplicate, or equivalent expressions requiring normal forms.", "slug": "span"}], "residual_id": "r:generated_span_closure_design:b030_a11_c7", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b030_a11_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Combining primitives can produce invalid, out-of-domain, duplicate, or equivalent expressions unless closure and normal-form rules are explicit. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Combining primitives can produce invalid, out-of-domain, duplicate, or equivalent expressions unless closure and normal-form rules are explicit."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Span requires an admissible grammar and closure but need not produce invalid, duplicate, or equivalent expressions requiring normal forms.", "slug": "span"}], "normalized_requirement": "Combining primitives can yield invalid, duplicate, equivalent, or out-of-domain expressions unless closure and normal-form rules are explicit.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Combining primitives can yield invalid, duplicate, equivalent, or out-of-domain expressions unless closure and normal-form rules are explicit.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 30, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-030", "ledger_sha256": "714f2e058f938d9ad32f7100b9598868b07671a43abb1e866620c2ddeda9b309"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Geometric Primitives Vocabulary Constraint", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:geometric_primitives_vocabulary_constraint", "slug": "geometric_primitives_vocabulary_constraint"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 5 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A design, representation, artwork, architecture, interface, model, or system needs coherence and clarity, but its available vocabulary of forms, marks, modules, or motifs expands opportunistically. Each new special-purpose element solves a local problem while weakening the whole language. Users cannot infer how forms relate, maintainers cannot reproduce decisions, and the system loses the disciplined economy that minimalism is supposed to provide.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A design, representation, artwork, architecture, interface, model, or system needs coherence and clarity, but its available vocabulary of forms, marks, modules, or motifs expands opportunistically. Each new special-purpose element solves a local problem while weakening the whole language. Users cannot infer how forms relate, maintainers cannot reproduce decisions, and the system loses the disciplined economy that minimalism is supposed to provide."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P054-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must apply to a work, representation, or system whose choices can form a language.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A work or artifact family is governed by design choices.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The formal language must be required rather than merely stylistically preferred.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The work needs a formal language.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must require recognizable shared form rather than any arbitrary set of elements.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The required language is recognizable as a coherent formal vocabulary.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires ad hoc visual choices as the baseline contrasted with formal language.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The rejected alternative is a collection of one-off visual choices.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires ad hoc structural choices as the baseline contrasted with formal language.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The rejected alternative is a collection of one-off structural choices.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "The work needs a recognizable formal language rather than one-off visual or structural choices.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A work requires a recognizable formal language instead of a collection of one-off choices.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P054-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A generated span can concern algebra, tools, or actions and need not be visual or recognizable as a design language.", "slug": "span"}], "residual_id": "r:geometric_primitives_vocabulary_constraint:b030_a12_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b030_a12_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The work needs a recognizable formal language rather than a collection of one-off visual or structural choices. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The work needs a recognizable formal language rather than a collection of one-off visual or structural choices."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A generated span can concern algebra, tools, or actions and need not be visual or recognizable as a design language.", "slug": "span"}], "normalized_requirement": "The work needs a recognizable formal language rather than one-off visual or structural choices.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The work needs a recognizable formal language rather than one-off visual or structural choices.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P054-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must include designers or maintainers introducing vocabulary elements.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Designers add elements to a design vocabulary.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must preserve 'keep adding' rather than one isolated addition.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The addition of new elements recurs.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The local-case need must motivate the additions rather than merely follow them.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The elements are added to solve local cases.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires addition of a new shape.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The added vocabulary element is a shape.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires addition of a new icon.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The added vocabulary element is an icon.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires addition of a new module.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The added vocabulary element is a module.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires addition of a new motif.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The added vocabulary element is a motif.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Designers keep adding new shapes, icons, modules, or motifs to solve local cases.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Designers repeatedly add new vocabulary elements to solve local cases.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P054-C08-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P054-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must include designers or maintainers and a rule-governed design vocabulary.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Designers maintain a vocabulary or system governed by reusable rules.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must preserve repeated exception creation rather than one isolated exception.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The addition of exceptions recurs.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The additions must be exceptions, not ordinary instances already admitted by the vocabulary.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The designers add exceptions to the governing vocabulary or rules.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The local-case need must motivate the exceptions rather than merely coexist with them.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The exceptions are added to solve local cases.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Designers keep adding new exceptions to solve local cases.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Designers repeatedly add exceptions to the design vocabulary's rules to solve local cases.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P054-C08-U2"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Design patterns can be used consistently without continuing addition of new primitives or exceptions.", "slug": "design_patterns"}], "residual_id": "r:geometric_primitives_vocabulary_constraint:b030_a12_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b030_a12_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Designers keep adding new shapes, icons, modules, motifs, or exceptions to solve local cases. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Designers keep adding new shapes, icons, modules, motifs, or exceptions to solve local cases."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PARTIALLY_DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "General refactors would not satisfy the unit, but recurring architecture-departing special cases necessarily do while preserving the software-entropy spine.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Software Entropy", "one_liner": "Read a codebase's growing structural disorder as a predictable gradient under continuous modification: locally expedient edits flow toward the vast basin of working-but-disordered states, and order decays monotonically unless restoring engineering effort is continuously reinjected.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:software_entropy", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O3"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "local_modifications_are_architecture_exceptions", "predicate": "The continuous local modifications are special cases that depart from the intended architecture.", "rationale": "Independent SSD review confirms that the exact record and the single atomic candidate-anchored qualifier necessarily entail one complete DNF branch without role, polarity, scope, or modality laundering."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "software_entropy"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "local_modifications_are_architecture_exceptions"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "software_entropy", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P054-C08-U2", "why_it_fits": "The DSA supplies maintainers, intended architecture, recurrent local fixes, and local pressure; one named manifestation binds those fixes as exceptions."}], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 2, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 1, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Design patterns can be used consistently without continuing addition of new primitives or exceptions.", "slug": "design_patterns"}], "normalized_requirement": "Designers keep adding shapes, icons, modules, motifs, or exceptions to solve local cases.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "PARTIAL_EXISTING_DSA_GROUNDING", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation grounded 1 of 2 eligible atomic units; the remaining unit or units stayed open."}, "predicate": "Designers keep adding shapes, icons, modules, motifs, or exceptions to solve local cases.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Compositional meaning can operate over a large controlled vocabulary and does not entail clutter or maintenance cost.", "slug": "compositionality"}], "residual_id": "r:geometric_primitives_vocabulary_constraint:b030_a12_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b030_a12_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Expressive range is needed, but uncontrolled variety would create clutter, maintenance overhead, brand drift, or interpretive ambiguity. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Expressive range is needed, but uncontrolled variety would create clutter, maintenance overhead, brand drift, or interpretive ambiguity."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Compositional meaning can operate over a large controlled vocabulary and does not entail clutter or maintenance cost.", "slug": "compositionality"}], "normalized_requirement": "Expressive range is needed but uncontrolled variety creates clutter, maintenance cost, drift, or ambiguity.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Expressive range is needed but uncontrolled variety creates clutter, maintenance cost, drift, or ambiguity.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime requires an explicit admissible-operations grammar governing combinations of primitives.", "role_mapping": "Repeatable grammar -> admissible operations; structure -> reachable generated closure.", "slug": "span", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b030_a12_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The same structure must be explainable as a repeatable grammar rather than as taste, intuition, or style preference. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The same structure must be explainable as a repeatable grammar rather than as taste, intuition, or style preference."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Span", "one_liner": "The complete set reachable by combining primitives under admissible operations.", "page_ref": "prime:span", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Repeatable grammar -> admissible operations; structure -> reachable generated closure.", "slug": "span", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime requires an explicit admissible-operations grammar governing combinations of primitives."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The structure must be explainable as a repeatable grammar rather than taste or intuition.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P054-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must include the composition, its underlying vocabulary, and removable decoration.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An existing composition has a base design vocabulary and decorative elements.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must preserve the prior removal attempt.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Decorative elements have been removed before crowding is assessed.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Persistent crowding must be entailed rather than successful simplification.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The composition remains visually crowded after removal.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The base vocabulary's diversity must explain continued crowding, not an unrelated layout property.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Excessive diversity in the base vocabulary causes the persistent crowding.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must require excessive, not merely nonzero, vocabulary diversity.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The base vocabulary is too diverse for the desired visual economy.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}], "predicate": "An existing composition remains visually crowded after decorative elements are removed because its base vocabulary is too diverse.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Excessive base-vocabulary diversity causes a composition to remain crowded after decorative elements are removed.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P054-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Minimalism reduces a work to essentials and does not require a prior failed ornament-removal attempt or excessive primitive diversity.", "slug": "minimalism_in_art"}], "residual_id": "r:geometric_primitives_vocabulary_constraint:b030_a12_c7", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b030_a12_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: An existing composition is visually crowded even after decorative elements are removed because its base vocabulary remains too diverse. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["An existing composition is visually crowded even after decorative elements are removed because its base vocabulary remains too diverse."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Minimalism reduces a work to essentials and does not require a prior failed ornament-removal attempt or excessive primitive diversity.", "slug": "minimalism_in_art"}], "normalized_requirement": "A composition remains crowded after decoration is removed because its base vocabulary is too diverse.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A composition remains crowded after decoration is removed because its base vocabulary is too diverse.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Stakeholders want simplicity, legibility, or austerity, but there is no operational rule for what counts as simple enough.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Stakeholders want simplicity, legibility, or austerity, but there is no operational rule for what counts as simple enough. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders want simplicity, legibility, or austerity, but there is no operational rule for what counts as simple enough."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Stakeholders want simplicity, legibility, or austerity, but there is no operational rule for what counts as simple enough."}, {"display_text": "The system must scale across many artifacts while preserving family resemblance, such as icons, components, modules, layouts, or generated forms.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A design, representation, artwork, architecture, interface, model, or system needs coherence and clarity, but its available vocabulary of forms, marks, modules, or motifs expands opportunistically. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: The system must scale across many artifacts while preserving family resemblance, such as icons, components, modules, layouts, or generated forms. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The system must scale across many artifacts while preserving family resemblance, such as icons, components, modules, layouts, or generated forms.", "A design, representation, artwork, architecture, interface, model, or system needs coherence and clarity, but its available vocabulary of forms, marks, modules, or motifs expands opportunistically."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The system must scale across many artifacts while preserving family resemblance, such as icons, components, modules, layouts, or generated forms."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 30, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-030", "ledger_sha256": "714f2e058f938d9ad32f7100b9598868b07671a43abb1e866620c2ddeda9b309"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Gestalt Continuation and Grouping Activation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:gestalt_continuation_and_grouping_activation", "slug": "gestalt_continuation_and_grouping_activation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 2 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 2}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The design contains related elements, partial forms, or implied sequence, but viewers can plausibly connect them in more than one way. Without deliberate continuation and grouping cues, the eye wanders, the wrong elements appear related, or an intended path feels broken. The structure is present in the designer’s mind but not sufficiently present in the perceptual field.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A visual field contains related elements, implied sequence, or incomplete structure, but the viewer has to infer how pieces connect and where attention should move. Without deliberate continuation and grouping cues, the eye may wander, group unrelated items, miss relationships, or complete the wrong form or trajectory."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P054-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"], ["O1", "O3"], ["O1", "O4"], ["O1", "O5", "O6", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must concern multiple visual elements whose configuration can be assessed.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Multiple elements occupy a visual field.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a spatially distributed configuration of the elements.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The elements are spatially distributed.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires partial occlusion of the elements.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The elements are partially occluded.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a discontinuous configuration of the elements.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The elements are discontinuous.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires visual similarity among the elements.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The elements are visually similar.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The visual similarity must reach the source's “enough” threshold for inviting alternative interpretations.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The visual similarity is sufficient to invite multiple interpretations.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The visual-similarity branch must permit more than one interpretation.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The sufficient visual similarity invites at least two interpretations.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}], "predicate": "Elements are spatially distributed, partially occluded, discontinuous, or visually similar enough to invite multiple interpretations.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Elements occupy an alternative spatial, visibility, continuity, or similarity configuration, with sufficient visual similarity inviting multiple interpretations.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P054-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Gestalt grouping operates even in unambiguous fields and does not require partial occlusion or multiple plausible interpretations.", "slug": "gestalt_principles"}], "residual_id": "r:gestalt_continuation_and_grouping_activation:b030_a13_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b030_a13_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Elements are spatially distributed, partially occluded, discontinuous, or visually similar enough to invite multiple interpretations. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Elements are spatially distributed, partially occluded, discontinuous, or visually similar enough to invite multiple interpretations."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Auditory and haptic instances falsify the branch without the guard, while visual common-fate instances necessarily contain spatially placed elements.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Common Fate", "one_liner": "Group visual elements that change together — moving, flickering, or co-varying synchronously — into one perceived object, on the inference that things sharing a fate usually share an origin.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:common_fate", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1", "O2"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "common_fate_stimulus_is_visual", "predicate": "The common-fate stimulus is visual.", "rationale": "Independent SSD review confirms that the exact record and the single atomic candidate-anchored qualifier necessarily entail one complete DNF branch without role, polarity, scope, or modality laundering."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "common_fate"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "common_fate_stimulus_is_visual"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "common_fate", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P054-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "Common fate supplies multiple simultaneous elements; the single visual-domain qualifier selects the source's spatial branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Music and prose provide counterexamples without the guard; a visual composition necessarily presents its parts in a visual field.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Aesthetic Coherence", "one_liner": "The holistic judgement that a composed artifact's parts belong together under a shared organising constraint, recognised faster than analysed — detectable from any patch yet localisable to none — with variety resolving into unity rather than accumulating as juxtaposition.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:aesthetic_coherence", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1", "O2"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "composed_artifact_is_visual", "predicate": "The composed artifact is visual.", "rationale": "Independent SSD review confirms that the exact record and the single atomic candidate-anchored qualifier necessarily entail one complete DNF branch without role, polarity, scope, or modality laundering."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "aesthetic_coherence"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "composed_artifact_is_visual"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "aesthetic_coherence", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P054-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record supplies a composed artifact with multiple parts; one visual-domain fact closes the spatial-distribution branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Tried a non-spatial or single-element instance; it lacks the layout relations whose transformation defines this DSA.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Responsive-Layout Breakage", "one_liner": "Diagnose the silent UI failure where an interface's content survives a viewport, device, or locale transformation but its layout-encoded meaning — priority, adjacency, hierarchy, above-the-fold prominence — is lost, so a passing content-accessibility check actively conceals the defect.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:responsive_layout_breakage", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "responsive_layout_breakage"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "responsive_layout_breakage", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P054-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every responsive-layout-breakage instance presupposes a rendered spatial arrangement of multiple content or control elements."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Auditory ensembles are counterexamples without the guard, while visual arrays necessarily distribute multiple items spatially.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Ensemble Coding", "one_liner": "Extract a statistical summary of a set of items in parallel — faster than any individual item can be encoded — and treat that summary as the default percept of the group.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:ensemble_coding", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1", "O2"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "ensemble_is_presented_visually", "predicate": "The ensemble is presented visually.", "rationale": "Independent SSD review confirms that the exact record and the single atomic candidate-anchored qualifier necessarily entail one complete DNF branch without role, polarity, scope, or modality laundering."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "ensemble_coding"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "ensemble_is_presented_visually"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "ensemble_coding", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P054-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "Ensemble coding supplies a simultaneous multi-item set; the one visual-domain qualifier closes the spatial branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Nonvisual modeled instances remain possible without the guard; a visual configural stimulus necessarily arranges constituent features spatially.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Configural Processing", "one_liner": "A perceiver recognizes an over-learned whole through relations among its parts and feeds that whole-level representation back onto part processing, so canonical arrangement improves constituent recognition and exposes relational violations that isolated features miss.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:configural_processing", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1", "O2"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "configural_stimulus_is_visual", "predicate": "The configural stimulus is visual.", "rationale": "Independent SSD review confirms that the exact record and the single atomic candidate-anchored qualifier necessarily entail one complete DNF branch without role, polarity, scope, or modality laundering."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "configural_processing"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "configural_stimulus_is_visual"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "configural_processing", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P054-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "Configural processing supplies multiple relational parts; one modality restriction closes the source's spatial branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Removing spatially distributed target-surround elements removes the integration-window mechanism and therefore the DSA itself.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Bezold Effect", "one_liner": "The color-perception phenomenon in which a target's apparent hue shifts toward a finely interspersed surround rather than away from it — assimilation, gated by whether the surround falls inside the visual system's spatial integration window.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:bezold_effect", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "bezold_effect"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "bezold_effect", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P054-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every Bezold-effect instance contains a target plus multiple surrounding visual elements arranged across a fine-grained spatial field."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Voice-only traversal is a counterexample without the guard, while visually rendered controls necessarily occupy distinct layout positions.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Focus-Order Failure", "one_liner": "The accessibility defect in which an interface advances programmatic focus (Tab navigation, screen-reader linearization) in a sequence that diverges from the task's semantic order — invisible to visual review, and sometimes placing a confirmation control before the content it confirms.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:focus_order_failure", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1", "O2"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "focusable_controls_are_visual", "predicate": "The focusable controls are presented in a visual interface.", "rationale": "Independent SSD review confirms that the exact record and the single atomic candidate-anchored qualifier necessarily entail one complete DNF branch without role, polarity, scope, or modality laundering."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "focus_order_failure"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "focusable_controls_are_visual"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "focus_order_failure", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P054-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record supplies a finite set of interface elements; one visual-domain qualifier closes the source's spatial branch."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Elements are distributed, occluded, discontinuous, or similar enough to permit multiple groupings.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P054-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must include an intended relation and a viewer who perceives the representation.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A representation carries a relation intended for a viewer.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "Perceptual organization must carry the relation rather than being incidental.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Successful uptake of the intended relation depends on viewer perception.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must preserve perception rather than text alone as the relevant carrier.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The intended relation is not conveyed purely through textual instruction.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The comparison must specifically include textual instruction, not any unrelated nonvisual channel.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The contrasted instruction channel is textual.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "An intended relation depends on viewer perception rather than purely textual instruction.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Communication of an intended relation depends on viewer perception rather than solely on text.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P054-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Automatic grouping can occur without a designer, intended relation, or contrast with textual instruction.", "slug": "gestalt_principles"}], "residual_id": "r:gestalt_continuation_and_grouping_activation:b030_a13_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b030_a13_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The intended relation depends on viewer perception rather than purely textual instruction. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The intended relation depends on viewer perception rather than purely textual instruction."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Automatic grouping can occur without a designer, intended relation, or contrast with textual instruction.", "slug": "gestalt_principles"}], "normalized_requirement": "An intended relation depends on viewer perception rather than textual instruction.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "An intended relation depends on viewer perception rather than textual instruction.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The design must communicate sequence, direction, process, relationship, grouping, or implied motion without excessive explanation.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use it when a visual field must communicate sequence, direction, relationship, flow, or implied motion without forcing the viewer to decode every connection consciously. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: The design must communicate sequence, direction, process, relationship, grouping, or implied motion without excessive explanation. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The design must communicate sequence, direction, process, relationship, grouping, or implied motion without excessive explanation.", "Use it when a visual field must communicate sequence, direction, relationship, flow, or implied motion without forcing the viewer to decode every connection consciously."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "The design must communicate sequence, direction, process, relationship, grouping, or implied motion without excessive explanation."}, {"display_text": "The viewer must scan quickly or under limited attention, as in interfaces, dashboards, signs, diagrams, or editorial layouts.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful in interfaces, maps, diagrams, dashboards, posters, storyboards, forms, and instructional graphics where the wrong scan path or wrong grouping causes misunderstanding. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The viewer must scan quickly or under limited attention, as in interfaces, dashboards, signs, diagrams, or editorial layouts. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The viewer must scan quickly or under limited attention, as in interfaces, dashboards, signs, diagrams, or editorial layouts.", "It is especially useful in interfaces, maps, diagrams, dashboards, posters, storyboards, forms, and instructional graphics where the wrong scan path or wrong grouping causes misunderstanding."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The viewer must scan quickly or under limited attention, as in interfaces, dashboards, signs, diagrams, or editorial layouts."}, {"display_text": "Misgrouping, wrong scan order, or false completion would create confusion, unsafe action, or poor comprehension.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Visual economy requires letting the viewer complete the structure, but uncontrolled completion can produce the wrong grouping, sequence, or motion. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Misgrouping, wrong scan order, or false completion would create confusion, unsafe action, or poor comprehension. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Misgrouping, wrong scan order, or false completion would create confusion, unsafe action, or poor comprehension.", "Visual economy requires letting the viewer complete the structure, but uncontrolled completion can produce the wrong grouping, sequence, or motion."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Misgrouping, wrong scan order, or false completion would create confusion, unsafe action, or poor comprehension."}, {"display_text": "The designer can manipulate alignment, spacing, rhythm, contrast, boundaries, directionality, or closure cues.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: The designer can manipulate alignment, spacing, rhythm, contrast, boundaries, directionality, or closure cues. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The designer can manipulate alignment, spacing, rhythm, contrast, boundaries, directionality, or closure cues."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The designer can manipulate alignment, spacing, rhythm, contrast, boundaries, directionality, or closure cues."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 30, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-030", "ledger_sha256": "714f2e058f938d9ad32f7100b9598868b07671a43abb1e866620c2ddeda9b309"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Gestalt Grouping Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:gestalt_grouping_design", "slug": "gestalt_grouping_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 2, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is that perceived grouping can diverge from intended structure. Nearby items look related. Similar items look like members of the same category. Enclosed items look like a unit. Aligned items look sequential or comparable. A partial boundary can make a viewer infer closure. These cues operate even when no one explicitly says that the relationship exists.\n\nThis creates a tension: grouping makes complexity easier to read, but it also manufactures apparent structure. A useful grouping cue compresses attention around real relationships; a harmful cue compresses attention around false ones.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Information, controls, objects, or spaces are perceived as belonging together, separate, continuous, complete, or hierarchical in ways that conflict with the intended structure, causing misinterpretation or misaction."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Gestalt organization occurs in natural perceptual fields and need not involve an authored representation or task-relevant relation.", "slug": "gestalt_principles"}], "residual_id": "r:gestalt_grouping_design:b030_a14_c1", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b030_a14_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A display, document, dashboard, form, diagram, spatial layout, or communication contains multiple elements whose relationships matter. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A display, document, dashboard, form, diagram, spatial layout, or communication contains multiple elements whose relationships matter."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Gestalt organization occurs in natural perceptual fields and need not involve an authored representation or task-relevant relation.", "slug": "gestalt_principles"}], "normalized_requirement": "A display, document, diagram, layout, or communication contains multiple elements whose relationships matter.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A display, document, diagram, layout, or communication contains multiple elements whose relationships matter.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P054-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must include users and a representation from which the relation is inferred.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Users interpret a representation containing task-relevant items or structure.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must require users to infer the applicable relation from the representation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Users must infer the branch-specific relation from the representation.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires an inferred membership or grouping relation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Users infer which items belong together.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires an inferred separation relation.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Users infer which items are separate.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires an inferred ordering relation.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Users infer which sequence should be followed.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires an inferred task-relevant boundary.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "Users infer which boundary matters.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Users must infer membership, separation, sequence, or boundary from the representation.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Users must infer a task-relevant relation from a representation.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P054-C13-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Automatic grouping need not support a user task or require inference of the listed relation.", "slug": "gestalt_principles"}], "residual_id": "r:gestalt_grouping_design:b030_a14_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b030_a14_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Users must infer which items belong together, which are separate, which sequence should be followed, or which boundary matters. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Users must infer which items belong together, which are separate, which sequence should be followed, or which boundary matters."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Priority-only layouts are counterexamples without the guard, while adjacency-encoded grouping necessarily tells users which items belong together.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Responsive-Layout Breakage", "one_liner": "Diagnose the silent UI failure where an interface's content survives a viewport, device, or locale transformation but its layout-encoded meaning — priority, adjacency, hierarchy, above-the-fold prominence — is lost, so a passing content-accessibility check actively conceals the defect.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:responsive_layout_breakage", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O3"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "layout_encodes_grouping_through_adjacency", "predicate": "The layout encodes item grouping through adjacency.", "rationale": "Independent SSD review confirms that the exact record and the single atomic candidate-anchored qualifier necessarily entail one complete DNF branch without role, polarity, scope, or modality laundering."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "responsive_layout_breakage"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "layout_encodes_grouping_through_adjacency"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "responsive_layout_breakage", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P054-C13-U1", "why_it_fits": "The DSA supplies a representation whose spatial relations users must read; one named branch selector makes membership the inferred relation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Users must infer membership, separation, sequence, or boundary from the representation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P054-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O11"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O12"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O13"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5", "O11"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5", "O12"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5", "O13"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6", "O11"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6", "O12"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6", "O13"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7", "O11"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7", "O12"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7", "O13"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O8", "O11"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O8", "O12"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O8", "O13"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O9", "O11"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O9", "O12"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O9", "O13"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O10", "O11"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O10", "O12"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O10", "O13"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must include a perceptible representation cue and an interpreted relation.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A representation presents a grouping or relational cue to users.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The cue must communicate the wrong relation, not merely be aesthetically undesirable.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The branch-specific cue implies a relation that is wrong for the task.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The causal direction from misleading cue through wrong relation to user consequence must be preserved.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The wrongly implied relation causes the branch-specific consequence.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This cue branch requires adjacency as the representation feature implying the wrong relation.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Adjacency implies the wrong relation.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This cue branch requires similarity as the representation feature implying the wrong relation.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Similarity implies the wrong relation.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This cue branch requires enclosure as the representation feature implying the wrong relation.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "Enclosure implies the wrong relation.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This cue branch requires labels as the representation feature implying the wrong relation.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "Labels implies the wrong relation.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This cue branch requires lines as the representation feature implying the wrong relation.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "Lines implies the wrong relation.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This cue branch requires whitespace as the representation feature implying the wrong relation.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "Whitespace implies the wrong relation.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This cue branch requires sequence as the representation feature implying the wrong relation.", "obligation_id": "O10", "statement": "Sequence implies the wrong relation.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This outcome branch requires errors as the consequence of the wrongly implied relation.", "obligation_id": "O11", "statement": "Errors occur as the consequence.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This outcome branch requires delays as the consequence of the wrongly implied relation.", "obligation_id": "O12", "statement": "Delays occur as the consequence.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This outcome branch requires misunderstandings as the consequence of the wrongly implied relation.", "obligation_id": "O13", "statement": "Misunderstandings occur as the consequence.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Errors, delays, or misunderstandings occur because adjacency, similarity, enclosure, labels, lines, whitespace, or sequence imply the wrong relation.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A representation cue implies a wrong relation and thereby causes error, delay, or misunderstanding.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P054-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Gestalt rules operate regardless of whether their resulting grouping is correct for an external task.", "slug": "gestalt_principles"}], "residual_id": "r:gestalt_grouping_design:b030_a14_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b030_a14_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Errors, delays, or misunderstandings occur because adjacency, similarity, enclosure, labels, lines, whitespace, or sequence imply the wrong relation. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Errors, delays, or misunderstandings occur because adjacency, similarity, enclosure, labels, lines, whitespace, or sequence imply the wrong relation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Action labels unrelated to item relations are counterexamples without the guard; under it, the wrong decompression necessarily implies a wrong represented relation.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Microcopy Ambiguity", "one_liner": "The HCI failure where a terse interface label admits more than one reading, so the user decompresses it against a prior different from the designer's and acts correctly on the wrong interpretation.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:microcopy_ambiguity", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1", "O2"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "microcopy_labels_task_relation", "predicate": "The ambiguous microcopy labels a task-relevant relation among represented items.", "rationale": "Independent SSD review confirms that the exact record and the single atomic candidate-anchored qualifier necessarily entail one complete DNF branch without role, polarity, scope, or modality laundering."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "microcopy_ambiguity"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "microcopy_labels_task_relation"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "microcopy_ambiguity", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P054-C14-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record supplies label ambiguity causing incorrect action; one atomic content restriction closes the labels-plus-errors branch."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Adjacency, similarity, enclosure, labels, lines, whitespace, or sequence imply a wrong relation and cause error or delay.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P054-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must include a representation and its perceptual grouping behavior.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The subject is a representation whose grouping can be perceived by users.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The optimization must be a completed design step, not merely a future objective.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Optimization has occurred before the missing test is assessed.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must entail absent grouping validation, not failed or successful testing.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The representation has not been tested for perceived grouping.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires appearance as the optimization target.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The representation was optimized for appearance.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires compactness as the optimization target.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The representation was optimized for compactness.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "A representation was optimized for appearance or compactness without testing perceived grouping.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A representation is optimized for appearance or compactness while its perceived grouping remains untested.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P054-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Gestalt organization does not require an optimization history or absent testing.", "slug": "gestalt_principles"}], "residual_id": "r:gestalt_grouping_design:b030_a14_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b030_a14_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A representation has been optimized for appearance or compactness but not tested for perceived grouping. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A representation has been optimized for appearance or compactness but not tested for perceived grouping."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Gestalt organization does not require an optimization history or absent testing.", "slug": "gestalt_principles"}], "normalized_requirement": "A representation was optimized for appearance or compactness without testing perceived grouping.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A representation was optimized for appearance or compactness without testing perceived grouping.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The cost of false grouping, missing a relation, or hiding an exception is significant.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A useful grouping cue compresses attention around real relationships; a harmful cue compresses attention around false ones. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The cost of false grouping, missing a relation, or hiding an exception is significant. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The cost of false grouping, missing a relation, or hiding an exception is significant.", "A useful grouping cue compresses attention around real relationships; a harmful cue compresses attention around false ones."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The cost of false grouping, missing a relation, or hiding an exception is significant."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 30, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-030", "ledger_sha256": "714f2e058f938d9ad32f7100b9598868b07671a43abb1e866620c2ddeda9b309"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Goal Congruence Alignment", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:goal_congruence_alignment", "slug": "goal_congruence_alignment"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 7, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 2, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 5, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 7 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 2 of 7 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 7}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a mismatch between the success function at the local level and the success function at the system level. Local actors are asked to act, decide, and prioritize with partial information and concrete targets. If those targets omit quality, resilience, safety, trust, user burden, long-term capacity, downstream rework, or cross-unit effects, then local excellence can accumulate into system failure.\n\nThis pattern often appears as green dashboards with unhappy users, fast throughput with high rework, low purchase price with high lifecycle cost, rapid case closure with rising appeals, or aggressive growth with declining trust.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Subunits optimize their own targets while damaging broader outcomes, creating cross-unit conflict, metric gaming, externalities, or drift from the system mission."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Aligned subunits may properly use differentiated goals and metrics whose contributions reinforce the system outcome.", "slug": "goal_congruence_alignment"}], "residual_id": "r:goal_congruence_alignment:b030_a15_c1", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b030_a15_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Different roles, teams, units, vendors, agents, or automated subsystems are evaluated by different goals or metrics. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Different roles, teams, units, vendors, agents, or automated subsystems are evaluated by different goals or metrics."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Aligned subunits may properly use differentiated goals and metrics whose contributions reinforce the system outcome.", "slug": "goal_congruence_alignment"}], "normalized_requirement": "Roles, teams, vendors, agents, or subsystems are evaluated by different goals or metrics.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Roles, teams, vendors, agents, or subsystems are evaluated by different goals or metrics.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact failure requires locally rational optimization whose interstage effects produce an outcome worse than joint optimization.", "role_mapping": "Local success -> scoped-stage optimum; whole-system loss -> omitted interstage effect.", "slug": "serial_local_optimization_failure", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b030_a15_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Local success can be achieved while the whole system performs worse, becomes riskier, or shifts burden elsewhere. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Local success can be achieved while the whole system performs worse, becomes riskier, or shifts burden elsewhere."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Serial Local Optimization Failure", "one_liner": "Stages arranged in series each optimize a local objective while treating their effects on other stages as outside that objective, so individually rational choices compound into an outcome worse than joint optimization.", "page_ref": "prime:serial_local_optimization_failure", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Local success -> scoped-stage optimum; whole-system loss -> omitted interstage effect.", "slug": "serial_local_optimization_failure", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact failure requires locally rational optimization whose interstage effects produce an outcome worse than joint optimization."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Local success can make the whole system worse, riskier, or burden another part.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Positive goal congruence aligns reward with contribution and does not entail isolated accountability.", "slug": "goal_congruence_alignment"}], "residual_id": "r:goal_congruence_alignment:b030_a15_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b030_a15_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: System outcomes require joint contribution, but accountability and rewards remain isolated by function, department, contract, or time period. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["System outcomes require joint contribution, but accountability and rewards remain isolated by function, department, contract, or time period."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Positive goal congruence aligns reward with contribution and does not entail isolated accountability.", "slug": "goal_congruence_alignment"}], "normalized_requirement": "System outcomes require joint contribution while accountability and rewards remain isolated by function, contract, or time.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "System outcomes require joint contribution while accountability and rewards remain isolated by function, contract, or time.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P055-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail a metric or proxy role and a distinct outcome that the metric is supposed to serve or represent.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A performance metric and the intended outcome are distinct principal roles.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail that actors optimize, pursue, or otherwise treat the metric itself as the target.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The performance metric becomes an object of direct targeting.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail the directed mechanism from metric targeting to behavioral distortion away from the intended outcome.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Targeting the metric causes behavior to diverge from the intended outcome.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the onset or transition sense, rather than describing only an unchanging metric-outcome association.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The metric has changed into a target and the distortion has begun.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "A performance metric becomes the target and begins distorting behavior away from the intended outcome.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Targeting a performance metric causes behavior to diverge from the intended outcome.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P055-C01-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Aligned metrics can remain faithful to system outcomes and need not become targets that distort behavior.", "slug": "goal_congruence_alignment"}], "residual_id": "r:goal_congruence_alignment:b030_a15_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b030_a15_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A performance metric has become the target and has started to distort behavior away from the intended outcome. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A performance metric has become the target and has started to distort behavior away from the intended outcome."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A mere flattering statistic that nobody targets would falsify O2 and O3, but it is excluded because the exact DSA requires selection, optimization, and behavioral movement toward the metric.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Vanity-Metric Addiction", "one_liner": "A team locks onto a metric chosen for how impressive it looks rather than its causal link to the outcome, then keeps it after the disconnect is known because dropping it carries social cost.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:vanity_metric_addiction", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "vanity_metric_addiction"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "vanity_metric_addiction", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P055-C01-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every complete vanity-metric-addiction instance makes a distinct metric into the operative target and directs behavior toward it while the intended outcome stalls or degrades; adoption and lock-in supply the onset sequence."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A manager who continues treating the measure only as a partial proxy would falsify targeting and distortion, but that is explicitly outside surrogation because construct-into-measure collapse is defining.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Surrogation", "one_liner": "Explain why a well-designed metric drifts from its purpose even absent any gaming: under load an accountable manager mentally replaces the strategic construct with its measure, treating the number as the thing itself rather than a partial proxy for it.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:surrogation", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "surrogation"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "surrogation", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P055-C01-U1", "why_it_fits": "Surrogation necessarily begins with a measure representing a distinct construct, changes that measure into the operative goal, and redirects planning and action away from uncaptured content of the construct."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A high-throughput organization that still gates work on outcomes would falsify target substitution, but the exact record explicitly excludes such organizations from feature factory.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Feature Factory", "one_liner": "The product-organisation anti-pattern of measuring success by features shipped per unit time while never asking whether any feature changed an outcome — a proxy output displacing the target it was meant to track, Goodhart's Law in the product operating loop.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:feature_factory", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "feature_factory"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "feature_factory", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P055-C01-U1", "why_it_fits": "The four-stage exact mechanism moves from a target outcome through an adopted output proxy to an operating loop rewarding the proxy as target, causing gaming and progressive output-outcome divergence."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A performance metric becomes the target and distorts behavior away from the intended outcome.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B5", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P055-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail an announced objective at the system level, not merely an unannounced or local preference.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Leaders announce a system-level goal.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail a substantive contrast or conflict between the system goal and the old local priorities.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The old local priorities are misaligned with the announced system goal.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail persistence of the old reward direction despite the newer announced system objective.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The old reward pattern continues after or despite announcement of the system goal.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only if resource allocation or budgets continue to favor the old local priorities.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Budgets continue to favor the old local priorities.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only if promotion decisions continue to reward the old local priorities.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Promotions continue to reward the old local priorities.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only if incentives continue to reward the old local priorities.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "Incentives continue to reward the old local priorities.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only if review routines continue to reward the old local priorities.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "Review routines continue to reward the old local priorities.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only if operational dashboards continue to favor or reward the old local priorities.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "Operational dashboards continue to reward the old local priorities.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Leaders announce a system goal while an institutional reward channel continues to favor old local priorities.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An announced system goal conflicts with continuing institutional rewards for old local priorities.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P055-C02-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact positive pattern requires incentive alignment and therefore does not entail contradictory old rewards.", "slug": "goal_congruence_alignment"}], "residual_id": "r:goal_congruence_alignment:b030_a15_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b030_a15_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Leaders announce a system goal, but budgets, promotions, incentives, review routines, or operational dashboards continue to reward the old local priorities. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Leaders announce a system goal, but budgets, promotions, incentives, review routines, or operational dashboards continue to reward the old local priorities."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact positive pattern requires incentive alignment and therefore does not entail contradictory old rewards.", "slug": "goal_congruence_alignment"}], "normalized_requirement": "Leaders announce a system goal while budgets, promotions, incentives, reviews, or dashboards reward old local priorities.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Leaders announce a system goal while budgets, promotions, incentives, reviews, or dashboards reward old local priorities.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 5", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B6", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P055-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail a substantive tradeoff involving more than one organizational or system unit.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A real tradeoff exists across units.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail the absence or failure of formal management for the cross-unit tradeoff.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The cross-unit tradeoff is unmanaged by a formal or adequate mechanism.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail that lack of tradeoff management leads actors to use informal bargaining to handle the tradeoff.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The unmanaged condition causes actors to rely on informal bargaining.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Because real cross-unit tradeoffs are unmanaged, actors handle them through informal bargaining.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Unmanaged cross-unit tradeoffs cause reliance on informal bargaining.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P055-C03-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P055-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail a substantive tradeoff involving more than one organizational or system unit.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A real tradeoff exists across units.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail the absence or failure of formal management for the cross-unit tradeoff.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The cross-unit tradeoff is unmanaged by a formal or adequate mechanism.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail that lack of tradeoff management leads actors to handle the tradeoff by avoiding escalation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The unmanaged condition causes actors to avoid escalation when handling the tradeoff.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Because real cross-unit tradeoffs are unmanaged, actors handle them by avoiding escalation.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Unmanaged cross-unit tradeoffs cause reliance on escalation avoidance.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P055-C03-U2"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P055-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail a substantive tradeoff involving more than one organizational or system unit.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A real tradeoff exists across units.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail the absence or failure of formal management for the cross-unit tradeoff.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The cross-unit tradeoff is unmanaged by a formal or adequate mechanism.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail that lack of tradeoff management leads actors to shift blame or responsibility rather than formally resolve the tradeoff.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The unmanaged condition causes actors to transfer blame when handling the tradeoff.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Because real cross-unit tradeoffs are unmanaged, actors handle them by transferring blame.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Unmanaged cross-unit tradeoffs cause reliance on blame transfer.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P055-C03-U3"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P055-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail a substantive tradeoff involving more than one organizational or system unit.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A real tradeoff exists across units.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail the absence or failure of formal management for the cross-unit tradeoff.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The cross-unit tradeoff is unmanaged by a formal or adequate mechanism.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail that lack of tradeoff management leads actors to use concealed bypasses or hidden workarounds.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The unmanaged condition causes actors to use hidden workarounds.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Because real cross-unit tradeoffs are unmanaged, actors handle them through hidden workarounds.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Unmanaged cross-unit tradeoffs cause reliance on hidden workarounds.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P055-C03-U4"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An agency problem requires a principal-agent dyad and information asymmetry and need not involve cross-unit bargaining or workarounds.", "slug": "agency_problem"}], "residual_id": "r:goal_congruence_alignment:b030_a15_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b030_a15_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Cross-unit tradeoffs are real but unmanaged, so actors resolve them through informal bargaining, escalation avoidance, blame transfer, or hidden workarounds. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Cross-unit tradeoffs are real but unmanaged, so actors resolve them through informal bargaining, escalation avoidance, blame transfer, or hidden workarounds."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 4, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 4}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An agency problem requires a principal-agent dyad and information asymmetry and need not involve cross-unit bargaining or workarounds.", "slug": "agency_problem"}], "normalized_requirement": "Unmanaged cross-unit tradeoffs are handled through bargaining, avoidance, blame transfer, or hidden workarounds.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 4 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Unmanaged cross-unit tradeoffs are handled through bargaining, avoidance, blame transfer, or hidden workarounds.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 6", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B7", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P055-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail an outcome whose relevant realization or evaluation spans more than a short local horizon.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The desired outcome spans multiple time horizons.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail local actors whose rewards depend on the listed local criterion, rather than merely observing that criterion.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Local actors receive rewards based on a local performance criterion.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail a temporal or evaluative misalignment between the rewarded local criterion and the multi-horizon outcome.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The local reward criterion conflicts with the desired outcome's broader time-horizon span.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only if local actors are rewarded for short-term throughput.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The rewarded local criterion is short-term throughput.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only if local actors are rewarded for cost reduction in the stated misalignment.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The rewarded local criterion is cost reduction.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only if local actors are rewarded for visible activity in the stated misalignment.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The rewarded local criterion is visible activity.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A desired outcome spans multiple time horizons while local actors are rewarded for a narrower local performance criterion.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Multi-horizon outcomes conflict with narrow local reward criteria.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P055-C04-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Goal congruence can explicitly align time horizons; the described conflict is its inverse rather than a necessary instance.", "slug": "goal_congruence_alignment"}], "residual_id": "r:goal_congruence_alignment:b030_a15_c7", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b030_a15_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The desired outcome spans time horizons, but local actors are rewarded for short-term throughput, cost reduction, or visible activity. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The desired outcome spans time horizons, but local actors are rewarded for short-term throughput, cost reduction, or visible activity."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Goal congruence can explicitly align time horizons; the described conflict is its inverse rather than a necessary instance.", "slug": "goal_congruence_alignment"}], "normalized_requirement": "Long-horizon outcomes conflict with rewards for short-term throughput, cost reduction, or visible activity.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Long-horizon outcomes conflict with rewards for short-term throughput, cost reduction, or visible activity.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 7", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 30, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-030", "ledger_sha256": "714f2e058f938d9ad32f7100b9598868b07671a43abb1e866620c2ddeda9b309"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Goal Valence Decomposition and Separation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:goal_valence_decomposition_and_separation", "slug": "goal_valence_decomposition_and_separation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 6, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 5, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 7 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 6 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 7}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A goal is being treated as one object, but its motivational structure is split. The same target contains benefits, values, aspirations, rewards, or identity fit, while also containing cost, risk, effort, uncertainty, loss, threat, stigma, or distrust. Because the positive and negative valences are fused, teams either sell harder, remove generic barriers, or aggregate everything into one score. Those moves hide the structure that actually determines action.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A goal, option, change, treatment, policy, or action is simultaneously attractive and aversive. The attractive side creates aspiration, value, or opportunity, while the aversive side creates fear, cost, identity threat, effort, uncertainty, obligation, loss, or risk. Because both pulls are fused under one label, actors oscillate, delay, comply superficially, resist covertly, or overcorrect toward one side. Generic persuasion, generic risk reduction, or generic decomposition fails because the system has not separated what should be amplified from what should be mitigated, respected, or redesigned."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact pattern requires positive pull toward one goal plus avoidance that produces intermediate stasis or vacillation.", "role_mapping": "Endorsed goal -> approach gradient; postponement or inconsistency -> avoidance-driven vacillation.", "slug": "approach_avoidance_conflict", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b031_a01_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A goal is endorsed in principle but repeatedly postponed, avoided, or pursued inconsistently. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A goal is endorsed in principle but repeatedly postponed, avoided, or pursued inconsistently."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Approach-Avoidance Conflict", "one_liner": "A single goal that pulls and repels at once, where competing gradients balance at an intermediate point and trap the actor in vacillation.", "page_ref": "prime:approach_avoidance_conflict", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Endorsed goal -> approach gradient; postponement or inconsistency -> avoidance-driven vacillation.", "slug": "approach_avoidance_conflict", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact pattern requires positive pull toward one goal plus avoidance that produces intermediate stasis or vacillation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A positively endorsed goal is repeatedly postponed, avoided, or pursued inconsistently.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Mixed positive and negative valence attached to the same goal is the defining exact structure.", "role_mapping": "Attraction -> approach gradient; concern -> avoidance gradient; same option -> single goal.", "slug": "approach_avoidance_conflict", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b031_a01_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: People describe the same option with both strong attraction and strong concern. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["People describe the same option with both strong attraction and strong concern."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Approach-Avoidance Conflict", "one_liner": "A single goal that pulls and repels at once, where competing gradients balance at an intermediate point and trap the actor in vacillation.", "page_ref": "prime:approach_avoidance_conflict", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Attraction -> approach gradient; concern -> avoidance gradient; same option -> single goal.", "slug": "approach_avoidance_conflict", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Mixed positive and negative valence attached to the same goal is the defining exact structure."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The same option evokes strong attraction and strong concern.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Appraisal can yield a single emotional response and need not be caused by persuasive messaging or contain opposed valences.", "slug": "cognitive_appraisal"}], "residual_id": "r:goal_valence_decomposition_and_separation:b031_a01_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b031_a01_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Persuasive messaging increases interest but also increases anxiety, reactance, or defensive interpretation. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Persuasive messaging increases interest but also increases anxiety, reactance, or defensive interpretation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Appraisal can yield a single emotional response and need not be caused by persuasive messaging or contain opposed valences.", "slug": "cognitive_appraisal"}], "normalized_requirement": "Persuasive messaging raises interest while also raising anxiety, reactance, or defensive interpretation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Persuasive messaging raises interest while also raising anxiety, reactance, or defensive interpretation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P055-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail an intervention that removes or reduces barriers to pursuing a goal.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An effort removes barriers affecting pursuit of a goal.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail that the intervention makes goal pursuit easier or less difficult.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The barrier-removal effort reduces difficulty.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail a preexisting motivating reason or value attached to the goal.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The goal has an original reason or value that made it matter.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail loss or non-preservation of the goal's original motivating value as the effort reduces difficulty.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The same barrier-removal effort fails to preserve that original motivating reason.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Barrier-removal efforts reduce difficulty but fail to preserve the original reason the goal mattered.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Barrier removal eases goal pursuit while losing the goal's original motivating value.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P055-C05-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Resolving the avoidance gradient can preserve the approach value; loss of original meaning is not mandatory.", "slug": "approach_avoidance_conflict"}], "residual_id": "r:goal_valence_decomposition_and_separation:b031_a01_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b031_a01_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Barrier-removal efforts reduce difficulty but fail to preserve the original reason the goal mattered. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Barrier-removal efforts reduce difficulty but fail to preserve the original reason the goal mattered."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Resolving the avoidance gradient can preserve the approach value; loss of original meaning is not mandatory.", "slug": "approach_avoidance_conflict"}], "normalized_requirement": "Removing barriers reduces difficulty but loses the original reason the goal mattered.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Removing barriers reduces difficulty but loses the original reason the goal mattered.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P055-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail multiple stakeholders and a universal mapping in which every stakeholder implicated in the disagreement attends to a valence different from the valences attended by the others.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "At least two stakeholders are relevant to the disagreement, and every such stakeholder attends to a distinct valence.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail, within the universal mapping, that each attended valence is positive or attractive or negative or aversive; a neutral or untyped valence cannot satisfy this obligation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Every valence in that stakeholder mapping is positive or negative.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail that every stakeholder perspective in the disagreement concerns one shared goal rather than unrelated goals.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "All differently attended valences belong to the same goal.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail that the stakeholders disagree because every relevant stakeholder attends to a different positive-or-negative valence of the shared goal.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The universally differentiated attention causes stakeholder disagreement.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Stakeholders disagree because every stakeholder in the disagreement attends to a different positive or negative valence of the same goal.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Differential attention to valences of one shared goal causes stakeholder disagreement.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P055-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Preference conflict can concern different objectives rather than different valences of one shared goal.", "slug": "preference_heterogeneity_and_conflict"}], "residual_id": "r:goal_valence_decomposition_and_separation:b031_a01_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b031_a01_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Stakeholders disagree because each notices a different positive or negative valence of the same goal. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders disagree because each notices a different positive or negative valence of the same goal."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Preference conflict can concern different objectives rather than different valences of one shared goal.", "slug": "preference_heterogeneity_and_conflict"}], "normalized_requirement": "Stakeholders disagree because each attends to a different positive or negative valence of one goal.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Stakeholders disagree because each attends to a different positive or negative valence of one goal.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B5", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P055-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail that the communicated framing presents only benefit and omits the aversive side.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The change is framed exclusively as a benefit.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail a loss tied to the change that is hidden, omitted, or not voiced.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A loss associated with the change remains unspoken.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail the directed causal relation from the unspoken loss to resistance.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The unspoken loss drives resistance to the change.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "A change is framed only as benefit while unspoken loss drives resistance.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Hidden loss drives resistance under benefit-only change framing.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P055-C07-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P055-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail that the communicated framing presents only benefit and omits the aversive side.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The change is framed exclusively as a benefit.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail an effort burden tied to the change that is hidden, omitted, or not voiced.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Effort required by the change remains unspoken.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail the directed causal relation from the unspoken effort burden to resistance.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The unspoken effort drives resistance to the change.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "A change is framed only as benefit while unspoken effort drives resistance.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Hidden effort drives resistance under benefit-only change framing.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P055-C07-U2"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P055-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail that the communicated framing presents only benefit and omits the aversive side.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The change is framed exclusively as a benefit.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail a threat to identity tied to the change that is hidden, omitted, or not voiced.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "An identity threat associated with the change remains unspoken.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail the directed causal relation from the unspoken identity threat to resistance.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The unspoken identity threat drives resistance to the change.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "A change is framed only as benefit while unspoken identity threat drives resistance.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Hidden identity threat drives resistance under benefit-only change framing.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P055-C07-U3"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P055-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail that the communicated framing presents only benefit and omits the aversive side.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The change is framed exclusively as a benefit.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail uncertainty tied to the change that is hidden, omitted, or not voiced.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Uncertainty associated with the change remains unspoken.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail the directed causal relation from the unspoken uncertainty to resistance.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The unspoken uncertainty drives resistance to the change.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "A change is framed only as benefit while unspoken uncertainty drives resistance.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Hidden uncertainty drives resistance under benefit-only change framing.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P055-C07-U4"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Mixed goal valence need not be publicly framed as benefit-only or keep its negative component unspoken.", "slug": "approach_avoidance_conflict"}], "residual_id": "r:goal_valence_decomposition_and_separation:b031_a01_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b031_a01_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A change is framed only as benefit, while unspoken loss, effort, identity threat, or uncertainty drives resistance. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A change is framed only as benefit, while unspoken loss, effort, identity threat, or uncertainty drives resistance."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 4, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 4}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Mixed goal valence need not be publicly framed as benefit-only or keep its negative component unspoken.", "slug": "approach_avoidance_conflict"}], "normalized_requirement": "A change is framed only as benefit while unspoken loss, effort, identity threat, or uncertainty drives resistance.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 4 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A change is framed only as benefit while unspoken loss, effort, identity threat, or uncertainty drives resistance.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 5", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B6", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Value commensuration can already place dimensions on a shared scale and does not entail stalled decomposition.", "slug": "value_commensuration"}], "residual_id": "r:goal_valence_decomposition_and_separation:b031_a01_c7", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b031_a01_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A decision cannot be made because benefits and costs are not commensurable until they are separated into clearer categories. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A decision cannot be made because benefits and costs are not commensurable until they are separated into clearer categories."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Value commensuration can already place dimensions on a shared scale and does not entail stalled decomposition.", "slug": "value_commensuration"}], "normalized_requirement": "A decision stalls because benefits and costs are not commensurable until separated into clearer categories.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A decision stalls because benefits and costs are not commensurable until separated into clearer categories.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 6", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 31, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-031", "ledger_sha256": "62a6e3e38c511f82fdc630a8a5eccd920a85ccd61198494db6a6881582a86cf4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Governance Exception Management", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:governance_exception_management", "slug": "governance_exception_management"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A standing rule works for ordinary cases but encounters impossibility, protected hardship, conflicting duties, equivalent alternatives, emergency, disproportionate burden, or genuinely novel facts. Rigid application defeats the rule's purpose or creates avoidable harm, yet informal departure gives insiders hidden access, produces inconsistent treatment, weakens enforcement, accumulates permanent waivers, and prevents recurring exceptions from correcting the rule.\n\n**Secret waivers.** The institution has discretion without an accessible exception pathway.\n\n**Rule purity with widespread workaround.** Formal uniformity is concealing operational noncompliance or an obsolete baseline.\n\n**Every request is unprecedented.** No comparator record or portfolio memory connects cases.\n\n**Permanent emergency.** Urgent authority lacks ratification, expiry, and after-action control.\n\n**Approval without limits.** A justified departure from one requirement has become an unbounded waiver.\n\n**Exception backlog grows while the rule remains unchanged.** Case processing is substituting for saturation feedback and rule redesign.\n\nThe structural difficulty is that every control can fail in two directions. Published criteria can become rigid taxonomy that excludes the genuinely novel case. Broad discretion can become influence. A detailed register can enable consistency and also surveillance. Expiry can prevent shadow policy and also destabilize reliance. Portfolio thresholds can force learning and also encourage decision makers to game classification. The intervention must therefore connect authority, access, reasons, information governance, time, comparison, and feedback rather than maximizing any one value.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A standing rule works for ordinary cases but encounters impossibility, protected hardship, conflicting duties, equivalent alternatives, emergency, disproportionate burden, or genuinely novel facts. Rigid application defeats the rule's purpose or creates avoidable harm, yet informal departure gives insiders hidden access, produces inconsistent treatment, weakens enforcement, accumulates permanent waivers, and prevents recurring exceptions from correcting the rule."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An incomplete contract may be illegitimate or simply silent and does not require a credible nonordinary case against a generally legitimate rule.", "slug": "incomplete_contract"}], "residual_id": "r:governance_exception_management:b031_a02_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b031_a02_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A real baseline rule is generally legitimate but not universally fitting. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A generally legitimate rule has credible nonordinary cases.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A generally legitimate rule has credible nonordinary cases.", "A real baseline rule is generally legitimate but not universally fitting."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An incomplete contract may be illegitimate or simply silent and does not require a credible nonordinary case against a generally legitimate rule.", "slug": "incomplete_contract"}], "normalized_requirement": "A generally legitimate rule has credible nonordinary cases.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A generally legitimate rule has credible nonordinary cases.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P055-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail a shared exception-access regime involving at least two comparable actors or cases.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Multiple relevant actors or cases may seek access to exceptions.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail unequal availability, opportunity, or success in obtaining exceptions across comparable parties or cases.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Access to exceptions differs unequally across those actors or cases.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Access to exceptions is unequal across relevant actors or cases.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Exception access is distributed unequally.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P055-C08-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P055-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail a process, arrangement, or regime through which affected parties obtain exceptions.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An exception-access regime governs whether parties can obtain exceptions.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail opacity or lack of visibility concerning exception access, not merely unequal outcomes.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "How access is available or obtained is not transparent to relevant parties.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Access to exceptions is opaque to affected or eligible parties.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Exception access lacks transparency.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P055-C08-U2"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Fairness can be satisfied and transparently administered; it does not entail unequal exception access.", "slug": "fairness"}], "residual_id": "r:governance_exception_management:b031_a02_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b031_a02_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Exception access is unequal or opaque. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Exception access is unequal or opaque."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PARTIALLY_DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A principled exception available symmetrically to mirror-image cases would falsify unequal access, but the exact record explicitly excludes principled exceptions from special pleading.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Special Pleading", "one_liner": "The fallacy of exempting a favored case from a general standard the arguer just invoked, without a principled basis — a consistency violation under self-serving direction, exposed by asking whether the arguer would grant the same exception to an opponent.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:special_pleading", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "special_pleading"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "special_pleading", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P055-C08-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every special-pleading instance contains comparable cases under one rule and grants an unprincipled exemption asymmetrically to the favored case, necessarily instantiating unequal exception access."}], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 2, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 1, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Fairness can be satisfied and transparently administered; it does not entail unequal exception access.", "slug": "fairness"}], "normalized_requirement": "Access to exceptions is unequal or opaque.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "PARTIAL_EXISTING_DSA_GROUNDING", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation grounded 1 of 2 eligible atomic units; the remaining unit or units stayed open."}, "predicate": "Access to exceptions is unequal or opaque.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Exemplar retrieval may use one prior case and does not require recurring exception requests.", "slug": "exemplar_retrieval"}], "residual_id": "r:governance_exception_management:b031_a02_c4", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b031_a02_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Similar requests recur. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Similar requests recur."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Exemplar retrieval may use one prior case and does not require recurring exception requests.", "slug": "exemplar_retrieval"}], "normalized_requirement": "Similar exception requests recur.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Similar exception requests recur.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P055-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail an approval or authorization that was intended to be time-limited rather than permanent.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An approval is granted with an intended temporary duration.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail persistence past the intended endpoint, not merely existence during the authorized temporary period.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The approval continues beyond its intended temporary duration.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail failure to expire, end, or be withdrawn as intended.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The approval does not terminate as its temporary status requires.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Approvals intended to be temporary persist beyond their intended duration.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Temporary approvals outlast their intended duration.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P055-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A time-of-check flaw concerns state change between validation and use, not persistence of a temporary approval.", "slug": "time_of_check_to_time_of_use_flaw"}], "residual_id": "r:governance_exception_management:b031_a02_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b031_a02_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Temporary approvals persist. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Temporary approvals persist."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A time-of-check flaw concerns state change between validation and use, not persistence of a temporary approval.", "slug": "time_of_check_to_time_of_use_flaw"}], "normalized_requirement": "Approvals intended as temporary persist.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Approvals intended as temporary persist.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P055-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail multiple or aggregate exceptions and the rule to which those exceptions apply.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A population of exceptions is associated with an underlying rule.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail that the pattern or population of exceptions can indicate a defect or failure in the underlying rule itself.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The exception population has evidentiary or diagnostic bearing on failure of that rule.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve possibility or diagnostic potential; an assertion only of certain, universal rule failure is too strong.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The diagnostic relation is possible, not asserted as inevitable or actual in every case.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "The exception population may reveal failure of the underlying rule.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A population of exceptions can diagnose failure of its underlying rule.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P055-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A default norm permits deviations but need not have a population of exceptions revealing rule failure.", "slug": "mandatory_vs_default_norms"}], "residual_id": "r:governance_exception_management:b031_a02_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b031_a02_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The exception population may reveal rule failure. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The exception population may reveal rule failure."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A default norm permits deviations but need not have a population of exceptions revealing rule failure.", "slug": "mandatory_vs_default_norms"}], "normalized_requirement": "The exception population may reveal failure of the underlying rule.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The exception population may reveal failure of the underlying rule.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Departure affects protected interests or third parties.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Departure affects protected interests or third parties. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Departure affects protected interests or third parties."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "Departure affects protected interests or third parties."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 31, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-031", "ledger_sha256": "62a6e3e38c511f82fdc630a8a5eccd920a85ccd61198494db6a6881582a86cf4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Graceful Degradation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:graceful_degradation", "slug": "graceful_degradation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 1 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 1}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Current stress or resource loss makes full functionality unsustainable even though a protected subset of function remains viable.", "explanation_source": {"field": "diagnostic_head", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Current stress or resource loss makes full functionality unsustainable even though a protected subset of function remains viable."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "This branch preserves the complete remedy-free diagnostic route; goals, feasibility clauses, gates, deployment constraints, and supporting context remain outside the DNF."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "EXT001-C051", "dnf": [["EXT001-U051-O1"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"obligation_id": "EXT001-U051-O1", "predicate": "Full functionality cannot be safely or reliably maintained under current stress, capacity limits, dependency failure, disruption, or scarcity."}], "predicate": "Full functionality cannot be safely or reliably maintained under current stress, capacity limits, dependency failure, disruption, or scarcity.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Full functionality cannot be safely or reliably maintained under current stress, capacity limits, dependency failure, disruption, or scarcity.", "unit_id": "EXT001-U051"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"catalog_exhaustion": "CONDITION_LEVEL", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Full functionality cannot be safely or reliably maintained under current stress, capacity limits, dependency failure, disruption, or scarcity.", "slug": "temporal_decay_and_degradation"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Full functionality cannot be safely or reliably maintained under current stress, capacity limits, dependency failure, disruption, or scarcity.", "slug": "robustness"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Full functionality cannot be safely or reliably maintained under current stress, capacity limits, dependency failure, disruption, or scarcity.", "slug": "margin_of_safety"}], "residual_id": "EXT001:graceful_degradation:C01", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding."}}, "condition_id": "ext001_graceful_degradation_a01", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored essence_one_line, compression_statement, components fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: Full functionality cannot be safely or reliably maintained under current stress, capacity limits, dependency failure, disruption, or scarcity.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Full functionality cannot be safely or reliably maintained under current stress, capacity limits, dependency failure, disruption, or scarcity."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Full functionality cannot be safely or reliably maintained under current stress, capacity limits, dependency failure, disruption, or scarcity.", "slug": "temporal_decay_and_degradation"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Full functionality cannot be safely or reliably maintained under current stress, capacity limits, dependency failure, disruption, or scarcity.", "slug": "robustness"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Full functionality cannot be safely or reliably maintained under current stress, capacity limits, dependency failure, disruption, or scarcity.", "slug": "margin_of_safety"}], "normalized_requirement": "Full functionality cannot be safely or reliably maintained under current stress, capacity limits, dependency failure, disruption, or scarcity.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Full functionality cannot be safely or reliably maintained under current stress, capacity limits, dependency failure, disruption, or scarcity.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A protected subset of function remains viable.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored essence_one_line, compression_statement, components fields; the source file was not modified. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: A protected subset of function remains viable. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A protected subset of function remains viable.", "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored essence_one_line, compression_statement, components fields; the source file was not modified."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "A protected subset of function remains viable."}, {"display_text": "Functions or quality levels can be prioritized without violating essential invariants.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored essence_one_line, compression_statement, components fields; the source file was not modified. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: Functions or quality levels can be prioritized without violating essential invariants. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Functions or quality levels can be prioritized without violating essential invariants.", "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored essence_one_line, compression_statement, components fields; the source file was not modified."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Functions or quality levels can be prioritized without violating essential invariants."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"candidate_ledger_sha256": "96f72d2139077fd57bf795048ebef33b3fd574b20963170080ec916b5b3b92fe", "extension_id": "new-archetypes-extension-001", "ledger_id": "prime-production-v1.2-extension-001", "ledger_sha256": "9644520614744632d1d36da44b1acd77ce432852c6083eb871203521c166efce"}, "base_projection_sha256": "841e0c7f3cb8e8054475ad29a8a14745a416b4fc115559a44878b94292e673ec", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "ca09ed9fe1598ce7072755b530de5553f5ee0a7cd64ae82d9e4a4e2149a37788", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Gradient Flattening", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:gradient_flattening", "slug": "gradient_flattening"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 2, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a steep gradient that acts like a force. The high-pressure, high-reward, high-risk, low-access, or high-burden side creates movement and stress. The low-capacity or low-access side may fall further behind. The system then spends effort reacting to symptoms: spillovers, queues, migration, emergency relief, repeated exceptions, resentment, extraction, or cascading overload.\n\nA flat response often fails because the problem is not uniform. Treating every region the same can preserve the original difference. Sometimes it worsens it, because the low side lacks the capacity to benefit equally from a nominally equal intervention.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A steep difference across a spatial, temporal, social, economic, technical, or operational field drives harmful flow, pressure, instability, exploitation, or unfairness; the problem persists because local fixes do not change the underlying gradient."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A gradient can be shallow, neutral, or beneficial.", "slug": "gradient"}], "residual_id": "r:gradient_flattening:b031_a03_c1", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b031_a03_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Steep harmful difference. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Steep harmful difference"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A gradient can be shallow, neutral, or beneficial.", "slug": "gradient"}], "normalized_requirement": "A field contains a steep harmful difference.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A field contains a steep harmful difference.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A nonzero gradient is not a guarantee of motion or stress because barriers and thresholds may prevent response.", "slug": "gradient"}], "residual_id": "r:gradient_flattening:b031_a03_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b031_a03_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Gradient-driven movement or stress. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Gradient-driven movement or stress"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A nonzero gradient is not a guarantee of motion or stress because barriers and thresholds may prevent response.", "slug": "gradient"}], "normalized_requirement": "A gradient drives movement or stress.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A gradient drives movement or stress.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P055-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail at least two differentiated positions or regions situated along the same gradient.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Multiple positions belong to a common gradient.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail invariant or equal treatment across differentiated gradient positions.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The same uniform treatment is applied across those positions.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail actual failure or inadequacy of the uniform treatment across those positions, not merely possible failure.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The uniform treatment fails across the gradient positions.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Uniform treatment fails when applied across positions in the same gradient.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "One uniform treatment fails across differentiated gradient positions.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P055-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A gradient can be measured without any uniform treatment or intervention failure.", "slug": "gradient"}], "residual_id": "r:gradient_flattening:b031_a03_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b031_a03_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Uniform treatment fails. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Uniform treatment fails"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A latent homogeneous-network assumption with no crossing, or heterogeneity across unordered categories, would fail the source but also fails the emitted actual gradient-boundary-crossing guard.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Fallacy of Homogeneous Networks", "one_liner": "The implicit assumption that all nodes, links, OSes, versions, and configs across a distributed deployment are uniform — a missing degree of freedom in the system's model of its substrate that stays latent until deployment crosses a boundary where the uniformity breaks.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:fallacy_of_homogeneous_networks", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1", "O3"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "gradient_boundary_crossing", "predicate": "The deployment actually crosses a boundary along one substrate gradient.", "rationale": "The exact candidate and one emitted qualifier necessarily satisfy a complete DNF branch without adding a principal role, unrelated relation, favorable unnamed subtype, or second condition."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "fallacy_of_homogeneous_networks"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "gradient_boundary_crossing"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "fallacy_of_homogeneous_networks", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P055-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "The DSA supplies the uniform handling and failure mechanism. One candidate-anchored boundary event, restricted to positions on a common gradient, jointly binds the source domain and actual-failure modality without adding a new role."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Uniform treatment fails across positions in the gradient.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P055-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail a locally bounded repair applied within a broader gradient, not a system-wide repair.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A repair is local to a portion or position of a gradient.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail displacement or continued movement of the problem along the gradient.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The problem migrates along the gradient rather than being eliminated.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail that the local repair fails to stop the migration, preserving the stated repair-to-persistence direction.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The local repair leaves that problem migration in place.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve continuation through or after repair, not describe only a one-time relocation before repair.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The problem continues migrating after or despite the local repair.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "A local repair leaves the problem continuing to migrate along the gradient.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Local repair fails to stop problem migration along a gradient.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P055-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A local optimum need not involve a spatially migrating harm or repeated repair.", "slug": "local_optimum"}], "residual_id": "r:gradient_flattening:b031_a03_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b031_a03_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Local repair keeps migrating. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Local repair keeps migrating"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A local optimum need not involve a spatially migrating harm or repeated repair.", "slug": "local_optimum"}], "normalized_requirement": "Local repair leaves the problem migrating along the gradient.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Local repair leaves the problem migrating along the gradient.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P055-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail a difference or gap between at least two comparable roles or states.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A disparity exists between comparable positions, groups, or states.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail compounding or cumulative amplification of the disparity, not merely its static persistence.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The magnitude or effect of the disparity grows cumulatively.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail temporal accumulation across successive states or periods.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The compounding occurs over time.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "A disparity compounds over time.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A disparity grows cumulatively over time.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P055-C13-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A gradient can remain stationary or flatten naturally and need not compound.", "slug": "gradient"}], "residual_id": "r:gradient_flattening:b031_a03_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b031_a03_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Disparity compounds over time. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Disparity compounds over time"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Attempted a complete exact-record instance while falsifying the selected DNF branch; each selected obligation is constitutive under the stated mapping.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Seismic Gap", "one_liner": "Read prolonged silence on a fault segment as accumulated strain rather than safety — a renewal-process inference that ranks segments overdue against their recurrence interval as highest-hazard, valid only where segmentation and characteristic-recurrence hold.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:seismic_gap", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "seismic_gap"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "seismic_gap", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P055-C13-U1", "why_it_fits": "Prolonged silence produces an accumulating strain gap."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Attempted a complete exact-record instance while falsifying the selected DNF branch; each selected obligation is constitutive under the stated mapping.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Annotation Drift", "one_liner": "The gradual, undocumented shift over time in how annotators apply an unchanged rubric, so identical instances get different labels — a silent recalibration of a measurement instrument, invisible to within-slice agreement and detectable only by re-annotating frozen gold.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:annotation_drift", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "annotation_drift"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "annotation_drift", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P055-C13-U1", "why_it_fits": "Identical instances diverge under an unchanged rubric as interpretive practice accumulates longitudinally."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A frozen codebase with a static architecture gap would not compound, but the exact record excludes it because software entropy is change-driven and requires continuous modification with monotone decay.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Software Entropy", "one_liner": "Read a codebase's growing structural disorder as a predictable gradient under continuous modification: locally expedient edits flow toward the vast basin of working-but-disordered states, and order decays monotonically unless restoring engineering effort is continuously reinjected.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:software_entropy", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "software_entropy"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "software_entropy", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P055-C13-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every software-entropy instance contains a growing current-versus-intended structural disparity and cumulative temporal amplification, making it a domain-specific subtype of the source relation."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Attempted a complete exact-record instance while falsifying the selected DNF branch; each selected obligation is constitutive under the stated mapping.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Spaghetti Code", "one_liner": "Diagnose a codebase as unmaintainable by reading its dependency graph: when boundary-violating edges accumulate past a threshold, the cost of any local change scales with the whole system rather than the unit being changed.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:spaghetti_code", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "spaghetti_code"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "spaghetti_code", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P055-C13-U1", "why_it_fits": "Boundary-violating dependencies accumulate until locality and modifiability collapse."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Disparity compounds over time.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 31, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-031", "ledger_sha256": "62a6e3e38c511f82fdc630a8a5eccd920a85ccd61198494db6a6881582a86cf4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Gradient-Guided Intervention", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:gradient_guided_intervention", "slug": "gradient_guided_intervention"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 2, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is unevenness without a trustworthy action rule. Something important varies across the field, but the system either treats everything the same or follows ad hoc signals such as loud complaints, recent incidents, senior intuition, or the easiest metric to measure.\n\nThat field may be a city, a production line, a customer base, a service fleet, a network graph, a patient population, a set of classrooms, a software architecture, or a design space. The gradient may show where harm is rising, where need is unmet, where pressure is accumulating, where opportunity is greatest, or where search should move next.\n\nThe central tension is that concentration can improve impact, but concentration based on a bad gradient can create harm. A valid gradient reveals decision-relevant variation. A bad gradient reveals measurement bias, historical inequity, stale data, or the locations where the system already pays attention.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Conditions vary across space, time, population, process state, or system region, and a uniform or intuition-led intervention wastes effort, misses critical variation, or reinforces the wrong pattern of action."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P055-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail a common comparison field containing multiple positions, groups, recipients, or regions.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The variable is distributed across at least two relevant positions or groups.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail unequal levels or concentration across the compared positions or groups.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The variable's distribution is uneven across that field.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only if risk is the variable distributed unevenly.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The unevenly distributed variable is risk.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only if need is the variable distributed unevenly.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The unevenly distributed variable is need.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Risk or need is unevenly distributed across relevant positions or groups.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A relevant burden variable is distributed unevenly.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P055-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Proportionality can govern a uniform population and does not require a spatial or indexed need gradient.", "slug": "proportionality"}], "residual_id": "r:gradient_guided_intervention:b031_a04_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b031_a04_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Uneven risk or need. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Uneven risk or need"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Attempted a complete exact-record instance while falsifying the selected DNF branch; each selected obligation is constitutive under the stated mapping.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Precondition for Unsafe Act", "one_liner": "Name the immediate situational, personal, and team conditions — fatigue, distraction, a steep authority gradient — that raise the probability of frontline operator error, a distinct HFACS layer between upstream supervision and the unsafe act itself.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:precondition_for_unsafe_act", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "precondition_for_unsafe_act"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "precondition_for_unsafe_act", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P055-C14-U1", "why_it_fits": "Fatigued and rested conditions carry unequal error risk."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Attempted a complete exact-record instance while falsifying the selected DNF branch; each selected obligation is constitutive under the stated mapping.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Timing Risk", "one_liner": "The failure mode where a technically sound product, technology, or policy fails not from its own defects but because the surrounding environment is not yet — or is no longer — ready to absorb it, treating environmental readiness as a risk factor independent of execution.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:timing_risk", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "timing_risk"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "timing_risk", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P055-C14-U1", "why_it_fits": "Failure risk differs by position relative to one readiness window."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "With the qualifier, the rare label denotes risk presence and the majority label its absence; the defining prevalence skew therefore makes the risk burden uneven across the example population.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Class Imbalance", "one_liner": "Diagnose why a 99%-accurate classifier can be useless: when one class vastly outnumbers the class of interest, additive loss aggregation lets majority examples dominate the gradient, so the model learns to ignore the rare minority.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:class_imbalance", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O3"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "minority_label_denotes_risk_presence", "predicate": "The minority label denotes presence of a risk burden that the majority label denotes as absent.", "rationale": "The exact candidate and one emitted qualifier necessarily satisfy a complete DNF branch without adding a principal role, unrelated relation, favorable unnamed subtype, or second condition."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "class_imbalance"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "minority_label_denotes_risk_presence"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "class_imbalance", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P055-C14-U1", "why_it_fits": "Class imbalance supplies unequal prevalence across groups. One named domain restriction, supported by the record's fraud, malignancy, defect, and intrusion examples, types the rare label as presence of risk."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Risk or need is unevenly distributed.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P055-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail the additional benefit attributable to an intervention, not merely total background benefit.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An intervention has a marginal or incremental benefit.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail variation in marginal benefit across at least two values of the stated axis.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The intervention's marginal benefit is non-constant across the relevant comparison axis.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only if marginal intervention benefit varies across locations.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The comparison axis is location.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only if marginal intervention benefit varies across recipients.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The comparison axis is recipient.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "The marginal benefit of an intervention varies by location or by recipient.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Intervention marginal benefit varies across a contextual axis.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P055-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Marginal analysis can find a constant marginal effect and does not require cross-location variation.", "slug": "marginal_analysis"}], "residual_id": "r:gradient_guided_intervention:b031_a04_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b031_a04_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Marginal benefit varies. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Marginal benefit varies"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_SYNTHESIS", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "With beneficiary and destination fixed as distinct locations, every complete instance lowers risk at one place and transfers undiminished risk to the other, so marginal intervention benefit cannot be constant.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Risk Transfer Without Reduction", "one_liner": "The maladaptation pattern in which an adaptation or defence lowers risk at a protected site by displacing the unchanged hazard onto a voiceless neighbour, catchment, or future generation — because it acts on one node's exposure rather than the generative pressure.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:risk_transfer_without_reduction", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O3"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "spatial_risk_displacement", "predicate": "The protected beneficiary and displacement destination are distinct locations.", "rationale": "The exact candidate and one emitted qualifier necessarily satisfy a complete DNF branch without adding a principal role, unrelated relation, favorable unnamed subtype, or second condition."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "risk_transfer_without_reduction"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "spatial_risk_displacement"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "risk_transfer_without_reduction", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P055-C15-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact DSA directly supplies intervention-attributable benefit variation between beneficiary and destination. Adjudication selects the exact record's named spatial branch with one atomic qualifier."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Marginal intervention benefit varies by location or recipient.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P056-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must concern diffusely distributed attention, not merely low effort at one known target.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Attention is allocated diffusely across a field containing multiple regions or cases.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must preserve need extremes as the missed objects rather than ordinary undifferentiated cases.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The field contains regions or cases at an extreme of need.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must entail the direction from diffused attention to missing the need extremes; coexistence is insufficient.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The diffuse allocation of attention causes those extreme-need regions or cases to be missed.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Diffused attention misses extreme-need regions.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Diffusely allocated attention fails to register or reach regions of extreme need.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P056-C01-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The streetlight effect follows observability rather than diffusion of attention and need extremes.", "slug": "streetlight_effect"}], "residual_id": "r:gradient_guided_intervention:b031_a04_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b031_a04_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Diffused attention misses extremes. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Diffused attention misses extremes"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The streetlight effect follows observability rather than diffusion of attention and need extremes.", "slug": "streetlight_effect"}], "normalized_requirement": "Diffused attention misses extreme-need regions.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Diffused attention misses extreme-need regions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A local optimum has no improving neighboring move and therefore does not entail a better local direction.", "slug": "local_optimum"}], "residual_id": "r:gradient_guided_intervention:b031_a04_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b031_a04_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Local signals point toward a better direction. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Local signals point toward a better direction"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A local optimum has no improving neighboring move and therefore does not entail a better local direction.", "slug": "local_optimum"}], "normalized_requirement": "Local signals point toward a better intervention direction.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Local signals point toward a better intervention direction.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Scarce intervention capacity.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when intervention capacity is scarce. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Scarce intervention capacity. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Scarce intervention capacity", "It is especially useful when intervention capacity is scarce."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "Scarce intervention capacity"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 31, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-031", "ledger_sha256": "62a6e3e38c511f82fdc630a8a5eccd920a85ccd61198494db6a6881582a86cf4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Grammar-Guided Structure Recovery", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:grammar_guided_structure_recovery", "slug": "grammar_guided_structure_recovery"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A process receives a flat, serialized, or locally ordered stream whose useful organization is nested, relational, or compositional. Delimiters may be incomplete, attachments may be ambiguous, and the same tokens may support multiple hierarchies. Downstream reasoning needs structure, but naïve splitting, position-only heuristics, or ungoverned model inference can omit material, attach it incorrectly, invent missing structure, or turn malformed or hostile input into executable meaning.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A process receives a flat, serialized, or locally ordered stream whose useful organization is nested, relational, or compositional. Delimiters may be incomplete, attachments may be ambiguous, and the same tokens may support multiple hierarchies. Downstream reasoning needs structure, but naïve splitting, position-only heuristics, or ungoverned model inference can omit material, attach it incorrectly, invent missing structure, or turn malformed or hostile input into executable meaning."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime recovers a hidden hierarchical object from a flat token sequence.", "role_mapping": "Serialized input -> flat sequence; parent-child relations -> hidden parse tree.", "slug": "parsing", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b031_a05_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The input is linear or serialized while the target representation contains nested or parent–child relations. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The input is linear or serialized while the target representation contains nested or parent–child relations."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Parsing", "one_liner": "Recover hidden hierarchical structure from a flat sequence using a grammar.", "page_ref": "prime:parsing", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Serialized input -> flat sequence; parent-child relations -> hidden parse tree.", "slug": "parsing", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime recovers a hidden hierarchical object from a flat token sequence."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The observable input is linear or serialized while the target structure is nested or hierarchical.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A finite generative grammar defines legal sequences and the structures they can express.", "role_mapping": "Declared rules -> generative grammar; licensed candidates -> legal parses.", "slug": "parsing", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b031_a05_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A declared grammar, schema, rule system, or constrained structural vocabulary can license candidate structures. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A declared grammar, schema, rule system, or constrained structural vocabulary can license candidate structures."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Parsing", "one_liner": "Recover hidden hierarchical structure from a flat sequence using a grammar.", "page_ref": "prime:parsing", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Declared rules -> generative grammar; licensed candidates -> legal parses.", "slug": "parsing", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A finite generative grammar defines legal sequences and the structures they can express."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A declared grammar, schema, rule system, or constrained vocabulary licenses candidate structures.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Parsing assigns grammar rules to ordered token spans, so order and boundaries are load-bearing evidence.", "role_mapping": "Order and spans -> grammar applications over the flat sequence.", "slug": "parsing", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b031_a05_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Order and span boundaries carry evidence that must be preserved through interpretation. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Order and span boundaries carry evidence that must be preserved through interpretation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Parsing", "one_liner": "Recover hidden hierarchical structure from a flat sequence using a grammar.", "page_ref": "prime:parsing", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Order and spans -> grammar applications over the flat sequence.", "slug": "parsing", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Parsing assigns grammar rules to ordered token spans, so order and boundaries are load-bearing evidence."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Token order and span boundaries carry evidence that interpretation must preserve.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A grammar can be unambiguous and yield one legal parse for every input.", "slug": "parsing"}], "residual_id": "r:grammar_guided_structure_recovery:b031_a05_c4", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b031_a05_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: More than one structural interpretation can fit the same surface sequence. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["More than one structural interpretation can fit the same surface sequence."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A grammar can be unambiguous and yield one legal parse for every input.", "slug": "parsing"}], "normalized_requirement": "More than one structural interpretation fits the same surface sequence.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "More than one structural interpretation fits the same surface sequence.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P056-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must preserve the source's 'may change' modality and must not require universal change.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Change in the branch-specific convention is possible rather than asserted to occur in every instance.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must preserve temporal change rather than only simultaneous variation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The branch-specific convention can differ across time.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires temporal change in a governing rule.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The convention that may change is a rule.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires temporal change in a grammar version.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The convention that may change is a grammar version.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires temporal change in a dialect.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The convention that may change is a dialect.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires temporal change in a contextual mode.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The convention that may change is a contextual mode.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Rules, grammar versions, dialects, or contextual modes may change over time.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A governing rule, grammar version, dialect, or contextual mode may change over time.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P056-C02-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A parser may operate indefinitely under one fixed grammar.", "slug": "parsing"}], "residual_id": "r:grammar_guided_structure_recovery:b031_a05_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b031_a05_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Rules, grammar versions, dialects, or contextual modes may change over time. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Rules, grammar versions, dialects, or contextual modes may change over time."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Tried a vocabulary that remains unchanged in practice. That does not falsify the modal claim that its governed, versioned rules may change, because the exact revision authority and lifecycle machinery preserve the possibility across time.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Governed Relation Vocabulary", "one_liner": "Close a metadata graph's allowed links into a standards-governed vocabulary in which every relation type fixes direction, inverse or symmetry behavior, and the action a consumer may safely take when following it.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:governed_relation_vocabulary", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "governed_relation_vocabulary"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "governed_relation_vocabulary", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P056-C02-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires a governed, versioned rule vocabulary and an authority able to add, deprecate, or revise its terms. That necessarily satisfies the rule branch [O1,O2,O3]: rule change is possible and can yield different versions across time, without asserting that revision occurs in every instance."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Tried a purely synchronic transformation with no developmental change. The exact identity includes an age-graded suppression schedule; removing that schedule leaves an incomplete instance and cannot defeat the modal rule-change branch.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Phonological Process", "one_liner": "Read a child's scattered speech errors as the output of a small number of rule-governed transformations that apply productively across whole natural classes and drop on a predictable developmental schedule.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:phonological_process", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "phonological_process"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "phonological_process", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P056-C02-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every complete Phonological Process instance contains rule-governed transformations that are dropped on a predictable developmental schedule. The rule can therefore differ across time, directly satisfying the rule branch [O1,O2,O3] with possibility rather than universal-change modality."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Grammar versions, dialects, rules, or contextual modes change over time.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Downstream actions depend on the recovered hierarchy rather than only on the raw sequence.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Useful action requires committing to structure that the surface sequence does not state explicitly, yet the system must not claim more certainty or authority than the sequence, grammar, and context support. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Downstream actions depend on the recovered hierarchy rather than only on the raw sequence. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Downstream actions depend on the recovered hierarchy rather than only on the raw sequence.", "Useful action requires committing to structure that the surface sequence does not state explicitly, yet the system must not claim more certainty or authority than the sequence, grammar, and context support."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Downstream actions depend on the recovered hierarchy rather than only on the raw sequence."}, {"display_text": "Malformed, partial, adversarial, or resource-exhausting inputs must fail safely.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Downstream reasoning needs structure, but naïve splitting, position-only heuristics, or ungoverned model inference can omit material, attach it incorrectly, invent missing structure, or turn malformed or hostile input into executable meaning. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: Malformed, partial, adversarial, or resource-exhausting inputs must fail safely. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Malformed, partial, adversarial, or resource-exhausting inputs must fail safely.", "Downstream reasoning needs structure, but naïve splitting, position-only heuristics, or ungoverned model inference can omit material, attach it incorrectly, invent missing structure, or turn malformed or hostile input into executable meaning."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "Malformed, partial, adversarial, or resource-exhausting inputs must fail safely."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 31, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-031", "ledger_sha256": "62a6e3e38c511f82fdc630a8a5eccd920a85ccd61198494db6a6881582a86cf4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Grand Narrative Decomposition", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:grand_narrative_decomposition", "slug": "grand_narrative_decomposition"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 5, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is over-coherent explanation. A grand narrative turns a complex field of events into a smooth arc, and the smoothness itself becomes persuasive. Once that happens, people may stop asking whether the arc depends on cherry-picked examples, suppressed anomalies, endpoint-driven interpretation, or hidden value judgments.\n\nThe danger is not narrative as such. The danger is an account whose scope exceeds its evidence and whose coherence hides its construction. The story may be partly true, useful, or inspiring, but still misleading when used as a universal explanation or decision guide.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A large-scale story makes complex history, strategy, institutional memory, or social change appear unified, inevitable, purposeful, or morally simple. Because the story is coherent, audiences stop inspecting its evidence choices, exclusions, causal leaps, endpoint assumptions, and legitimacy effects."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime imposes one plot logic across a domain too large for its coherence to be evidentially supported.", "role_mapping": "Large-scale explanation -> totalizing story; smoothing -> suppressed local variation.", "slug": "grand_narrative_metanarrative", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b031_a06_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Over smooth large scale explanation. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["over_smooth_large_scale_explanation"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Grand Narrative (Metanarrative)", "one_liner": "Overarching explanations.", "page_ref": "prime:grand_narrative_metanarrative", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Large-scale explanation -> totalizing story; smoothing -> suppressed local variation.", "slug": "grand_narrative_metanarrative", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime imposes one plot logic across a domain too large for its coherence to be evidentially supported."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "One large-scale explanation smooths over local variation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P056-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must include a narrative or large-scale story as the object under pressure.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A narrative supplies the account being evaluated.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must entail a challenge or strain on the narrative, not merely mention material outside it.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The branch-specific discordant material places pressure on the narrative's adequacy or coherence.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires excluded cases to be the source of pressure.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The pressure comes from cases excluded by the narrative.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires anomalies to be the source of pressure.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The pressure comes from anomalies relative to the narrative.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Excluded cases or anomalies place pressure on the narrative.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An excluded case or anomaly challenges the adequacy or coherence of a narrative.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P056-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A totalizing narrative may absorb local cases as waypoints and need not face an explicit anomaly or exclusion challenge.", "slug": "grand_narrative_metanarrative"}], "residual_id": "r:grand_narrative_decomposition:b031_a06_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b031_a06_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Exclusion or anomaly pressure. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["exclusion_or_anomaly_pressure"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A totalizing narrative may absorb local cases as waypoints and need not face an explicit anomaly or exclusion challenge.", "slug": "grand_narrative_metanarrative"}], "normalized_requirement": "Excluded cases or anomalies place pressure on the narrative.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Excluded cases or anomalies place pressure on the narrative.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A unifying directional trajectory or end-state claim is mandatory in the exact record.", "role_mapping": "Teleological language -> directional trajectory claim.", "slug": "grand_narrative_metanarrative", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b031_a06_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Teleological language. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["teleological_language"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Grand Narrative (Metanarrative)", "one_liner": "Overarching explanations.", "page_ref": "prime:grand_narrative_metanarrative", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Teleological language -> directional trajectory claim.", "slug": "grand_narrative_metanarrative", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A unifying directional trajectory or end-state claim is mandatory in the exact record."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The explanation uses teleological or inevitable-trajectory language.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The metanarrative's implicit legitimating function for institutions and epistemic practices is defining.", "role_mapping": "Institutional or identity use -> legitimating function.", "slug": "grand_narrative_metanarrative", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b031_a06_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Institutional or identity use. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["institutional_or_identity_use"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Grand Narrative (Metanarrative)", "one_liner": "Overarching explanations.", "page_ref": "prime:grand_narrative_metanarrative", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Institutional or identity use -> legitimating function.", "slug": "grand_narrative_metanarrative", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The metanarrative's implicit legitimating function for institutions and epistemic practices is defining."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The narrative supports institutional legitimacy or collective identity.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Totalizing scope applies one plot logic where empirical coherence is unsupported.", "role_mapping": "Causal overcompression -> single plot across excessive scope.", "slug": "grand_narrative_metanarrative", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b031_a06_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Causal overcompression. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["causal_overcompression"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Grand Narrative (Metanarrative)", "one_liner": "Overarching explanations.", "page_ref": "prime:grand_narrative_metanarrative", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Causal overcompression -> single plot across excessive scope.", "slug": "grand_narrative_metanarrative", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Totalizing scope applies one plot logic where empirical coherence is unsupported."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A single causal plot overcompresses a large heterogeneous domain.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact account is typically presupposed rather than defended and sustained by legitimation rather than empirical fit.", "role_mapping": "Authority without audit -> implicit legitimating framework.", "slug": "grand_narrative_metanarrative", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b031_a06_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Narrative authority without audit. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["narrative_authority_without_audit"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Grand Narrative (Metanarrative)", "one_liner": "Overarching explanations.", "page_ref": "prime:grand_narrative_metanarrative", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Authority without audit -> implicit legitimating framework.", "slug": "grand_narrative_metanarrative", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact account is typically presupposed rather than defended and sustained by legitimation rather than empirical fit."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Narrative authority is sustained without explicit empirical audit.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 31, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-031", "ledger_sha256": "62a6e3e38c511f82fdc630a8a5eccd920a85ccd61198494db6a6881582a86cf4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Graph Pruning", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:graph_pruning", "slug": "graph_pruning"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 6, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 5, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 6 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 1 of 6 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A graph can fail by having too few connections, but it can also fail by having too many or the wrong ones. Connections accumulate through growth, emergency workarounds, temporary projects, inherited permissions, informal relationships, convenience, and institutional inertia. Each edge then becomes a standing invitation for flow, obligation, compromise, misunderstanding, maintenance, or propagation.\n\nThe structural problem is not simply “complexity.” It is edge-level complexity: too many connections must be remembered, maintained, secured, interpreted, audited, or negotiated. Harm can travel through those edges, and useful signal can be buried under them. Graph Pruning addresses this by changing the connection pattern itself.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A network has too many edges, the wrong edges, stale edges, duplicative edges, or harmful edges. The result is complexity, noise, contagion, conflict, security exposure, maintenance burden, change-propagation risk, or degraded ability to reason about the system."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P056-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O4", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O4", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O4", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must preserve a system-level connection substrate rather than unrelated item accumulation.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A system or network contains the connections whose growth and management capacity are compared.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must preserve the directional comparison: connection growth exceeds capability growth or capacity.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Growth in the selected connection measure outpaces the system's selected capability for those connections.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires connection count, not density alone, as the growth measure.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The growing connection measure is the number of connections.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires connection density, not count alone, as the growth measure.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The growing connection measure is connection density.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires maintenance capacity as the outpaced capability.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The outpaced system capability is maintaining the connections.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires understanding or reasoning capacity as the outpaced capability.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The outpaced system capability is understanding the connections.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires security capacity as the outpaced capability.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The outpaced system capability is securing the connections.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires governance capacity as the outpaced capability.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The outpaced system capability is governing the connections.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "The number or density of connections has grown faster than the system’s ability to maintain, understand, secure, or govern them.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Connection count or density growth outpaces a system's capacity to maintain, understand, secure, or govern those connections.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P056-C04-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Pruning requires prior overgeneration but not that connection growth exceed governance capacity.", "slug": "pruning"}], "residual_id": "r:graph_pruning:b031_a07_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b031_a07_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The number or density of connections has grown faster than the system’s ability to maintain, understand, secure, or govern them. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The number or density of connections has grown faster than the system’s ability to maintain, understand, secure, or govern them."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Tried a high-degree integration hub that remains locally understandable as it grows. The exact God Object identity includes comprehension saturation and continued attractor-driven accretion, so that benign hub is not a complete instance.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "God Object Anti-Pattern", "one_liner": "Diagnose a maintenance mess as concentrated rather than diffuse: one class or service accumulates outlier fan-in and fan-out to become the integration hub, collapsing modularity so all change-cost, comprehension, and new features funnel through that single node.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:god_object_anti_pattern", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "god_object_anti_pattern"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "god_object_anti_pattern", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P056-C04-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record makes one hub continually accrete dependency edges until only a small subset of the team can hold it in mind safely. Connection-count growth thus exceeds understanding capacity and necessarily satisfies [O1,O2,O3,O6] without a qualifier."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Tried dense dependencies that remain bounded and locally understandable. That contradicts the exact edge-density buildup and locality-loss signature, so it is not a complete Spaghetti Code instance.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Spaghetti Code", "one_liner": "Diagnose a codebase as unmaintainable by reading its dependency graph: when boundary-violating edges accumulate past a threshold, the cost of any local change scales with the whole system rather than the unit being changed.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:spaghetti_code", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "spaghetti_code"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "spaghetti_code", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P056-C04-U1", "why_it_fits": "Spaghetti Code constitutively accumulates boundary-violating dependency edges past the point where any unit can be understood in isolation. The density-growth versus understanding-capacity branch [O1,O2,O4,O6] is therefore necessary without a qualifier."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Connection count or density outgrows capacity to maintain, understand, secure, or govern it.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A graph cut separates a topology but does not require the removed edges to be noisy or harmful.", "slug": "cut"}], "residual_id": "r:graph_pruning:b031_a07_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b031_a07_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The result is complexity, noise, contagion, conflict, security exposure, maintenance burden, change-propagation risk, or degraded ability to reason about the system. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Some edges carry mostly noise, risk, obligation, conflict, or attack surface rather than useful flow.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Some edges carry mostly noise, risk, obligation, conflict, or attack surface rather than useful flow.", "The result is complexity, noise, contagion, conflict, security exposure, maintenance burden, change-propagation risk, or degraded ability to reason about the system."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A graph cut separates a topology but does not require the removed edges to be noisy or harmful.", "slug": "cut"}], "normalized_requirement": "Some edges carry mostly noise, risk, obligation, conflict, or attack surface rather than useful flow.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Some edges carry mostly noise, risk, obligation, conflict, or attack surface rather than useful flow.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P056-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must include a need belonging to an earlier context and a connection that is stale, without requiring that the need originally created or justified the connection.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The focal roles are a past need and a stale connection.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must preserve that the need belongs to an earlier context or period.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The need has become a past rather than current need.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must entail non-retirement of the need rather than successful closure.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The past need was never retired.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must preserve continued presence of an obsolete connection.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The associated connection remains present and is stale.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must preserve the source's causal direction from non-retirement to persistence.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Failure to retire the past need causes the stale connection to persist.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Stale connections persist because past needs were never retired.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Failure to retire a past need causes a stale connection to persist.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P056-C05-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A prunable component may be newly generated and underused without being stale or linked to a past need.", "slug": "pruning"}], "residual_id": "r:graph_pruning:b031_a07_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b031_a07_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Stale connections persist because past needs were never retired. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Stale connections persist because past needs were never retired."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A prunable component may be newly generated and underused without being stale or linked to a past need.", "slug": "pruning"}], "normalized_requirement": "Stale connections persist after the needs that created them disappear.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Stale connections persist after the needs that created them disappear.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Propagation can carry beneficial or neutral signals and does not entail harm.", "slug": "propagation"}], "residual_id": "r:graph_pruning:b031_a07_c4", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b031_a07_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Propagation through the graph is creating harm. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Propagation through the graph is creating harm."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Propagation can carry beneficial or neutral signals and does not entail harm.", "slug": "propagation"}], "normalized_requirement": "Propagation through the graph creates harm.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Propagation through the graph creates harm.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B5", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P056-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O4", "O5", "O6"], ["O1", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must concern a network edge or equivalent connection.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The subject is an edge or connection in a network or relational system.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires redundancy of the edge.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The problematic edge is redundant.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires duplication by the edge.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The problematic edge is duplicative.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must make the edge condition the cause of the ensuing lack of clarity.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The branch-specific surplus edge condition causes governance-role ambiguity.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must entail lack of clarity about authority.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Authority is unclear.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must entail lack of clarity about accountability in addition to authority.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "Accountability is unclear.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Redundant or duplicative edges make authority and accountability unclear.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A redundant or duplicative network edge causes both authority and accountability to become unclear.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P056-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Prunable surplus can be clearly owned and need not affect authority or accountability.", "slug": "pruning"}], "residual_id": "r:graph_pruning:b031_a07_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b031_a07_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Redundant or duplicative edges make authority and accountability unclear. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Redundant or duplicative edges make authority and accountability unclear."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Prunable surplus can be clearly owned and need not affect authority or accountability.", "slug": "pruning"}], "normalized_requirement": "Redundant edges obscure authority and accountability.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Redundant edges obscure authority and accountability.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 5", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B6", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P056-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must concern connectivity in a networked or relational system.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A system or network has an edge set whose connectivity policy and performance can be assessed.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must preserve maximization rather than merely high or increasing connectivity.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The current policy maximizes connectivity.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must preserve default application rather than a one-off deliberate choice.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Connectivity maximization operates as the default policy.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must preserve the reduction in edge count.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The alternative edge set contains fewer edges than the maximized-connectivity set.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must preserve improved governance of the remaining edges, not reduction alone.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The alternative's edges are better governed.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must preserve the counterfactual performance advantage of the full alternative over default maximization.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The system would work better under the combined fewer-and-better-governed alternative.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Connectivity is being maximized by default, but the system would work better with fewer and better-governed edges.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A system defaults to maximum connectivity even though a smaller, better-governed edge set would perform better.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P056-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Pruning does not require a default connectivity-maximization policy or graph substrate.", "slug": "pruning"}], "residual_id": "r:graph_pruning:b031_a07_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b031_a07_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Connectivity is being maximized by default, but the system would work better with fewer and better-governed edges. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Connectivity is being maximized by default, but the system would work better with fewer and better-governed edges."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Pruning does not require a default connectivity-maximization policy or graph substrate.", "slug": "pruning"}], "normalized_requirement": "Connectivity is maximized by default although fewer governed edges would work better.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Connectivity is maximized by default although fewer governed edges would work better.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 6", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "DISJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 31, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-031", "ledger_sha256": "62a6e3e38c511f82fdc630a8a5eccd920a85ccd61198494db6a6881582a86cf4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Greedy Stepwise Commitment", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:greedy_stepwise_commitment", "slug": "greedy_stepwise_commitment"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A decision or optimization task must be solved by a sequence of commitments, but full enumeration, backtracking, dynamic programming, or long-horizon policy evaluation is too slow, costly, opaque, or operationally unavailable. A locally appealing choice can be identified at each step, yet committing to it can also consume capacity, reshape the residual problem, and create path-dependent traps if the local score is misaligned with whole-solution quality.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A decision or optimization task must be solved by a sequence of commitments, but full enumeration, backtracking, dynamic programming, or long-horizon policy evaluation is too slow, costly, opaque, or operationally unavailable. A locally appealing choice can be identified at each step, yet committing to it can also consume capacity, reshape the residual problem, and create path-dependent traps if the local score is misaligned with whole-solution quality."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact procedure is a sequence of choices selected one at a time from those currently available.", "role_mapping": "Incremental construction -> decision sequence; feasible choices -> available candidates.", "slug": "greedy_algorithm", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b031_a08_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A locally appealing choice can be identified at each step, yet committing to it can also consume capacity, reshape the residual problem, and create path-dependent traps if the local score is misaligned with whole-solution quality. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A solution must be constructed incrementally from currently feasible choices.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A solution must be constructed incrementally from currently feasible choices.", "A locally appealing choice can be identified at each step, yet committing to it can also consume capacity, reshape the residual problem, and create path-dependent traps if the local score is misaligned with whole-solution quality."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Greedy Algorithm", "one_liner": "Committing irrevocably to the locally best choice at each step, with no lookahead.", "page_ref": "prime:greedy_algorithm", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Incremental construction -> decision sequence; feasible choices -> available candidates.", "slug": "greedy_algorithm", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact procedure is a sequence of choices selected one at a time from those currently available."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A solution must be constructed incrementally from currently feasible choices.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A local evaluation function ranks current choices using present information and no downstream consequences.", "role_mapping": "Immediate score -> local evaluation function.", "slug": "greedy_algorithm", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b031_a08_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Each next step can be scored with immediately available information. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Each next step can be scored with immediately available information."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Greedy Algorithm", "one_liner": "Committing irrevocably to the locally best choice at each step, with no lookahead.", "page_ref": "prime:greedy_algorithm", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Immediate score -> local evaluation function.", "slug": "greedy_algorithm", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A local evaluation function ranks current choices using present information and no downstream consequences."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Each next step can be scored using immediately available information.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P056-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must concern a durable commitment with a later reversal operation.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A commitment persists through time and can in principle be reversed later.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must preserve the source's 'enough durability' threshold linking persistence to the consequence.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The commitment's durability is sufficient to produce the branch-specific reversal constraint.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must preserve later reversal rather than immediate reconsideration.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The constrained reversal would occur later than the commitment.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a material cost of reversing the commitment later.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Later reversal is expensive.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires prohibition rather than mere inconvenience.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Later reversal is forbidden.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires an operational reason that makes reversal undesirable.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "Later reversal is operationally undesirable.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Commitments have enough durability that later reversal is expensive, forbidden, or operationally undesirable.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A commitment is sufficiently durable that reversing it later is expensive, forbidden, or operationally undesirable.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P056-C08-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Greedy irrevocability is procedural and need not arise from an externally costly or forbidden reversal.", "slug": "greedy_algorithm"}], "residual_id": "r:greedy_stepwise_commitment:b031_a08_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b031_a08_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Commitments have enough durability that later reversal is expensive, forbidden, or operationally undesirable. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Commitments have enough durability that later reversal is expensive, forbidden, or operationally undesirable."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Tried a reversible pilot or fully variable expansion with no later contraction cost. Such a case lacks the exact locked-in cost base and painful contraction endgame, so it is not a complete Scale-before-Fit instance.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Scale-Before-Fit", "one_liner": "Diagnose a venture's failure as one of ordering — committing substantial growth investment before demonstrating repeatable, unsubsidised demand — by asking whether the evidence at the moment of commitment justified the cost base it locked in.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:scale_before_fit", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "scale_before_fit"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "scale_before_fit", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P056-C08-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every Scale-before-Fit instance commits substantial growth investment that locks in a cost base before adequate evidence and later permits only painful contraction. This directly satisfies the expensive-reversal branch [O1,O2,O3,O4]."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Tried a contestant able to abandon the campaign or change strategy freely after the conversion assumption fails. That removes the exact lock-in and no-exit-without-concession structure, so the case is not an Attrition Trap.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Attrition Trap", "one_liner": "Diagnose a grinding campaign as failing-without-being-lost when its operational clock runs but its strategic clock has stopped — because the conversion assumption linking losses to strategic transition was falsified — and lock-in prevents exit.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:attrition_trap", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "attrition_trap"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "attrition_trap", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P056-C08-U1", "why_it_fits": "An Attrition Trap requires commitment to a grinding campaign followed by political, organizational, or reputational lock-in that prevents free later exit without conceding the objective. The operationally-undesirable reversal branch [O1,O2,O3,O6] is therefore necessary."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Tried a position reducible at par before funding can withdraw. That destroys the exact maturity-and-illiquidity mismatch and is not a complete Funding Fragility instance.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Funding Fragility", "one_liner": "The condition in which an entity depends on short, revocable, confidence-sensitive financing to sustain long, illiquid positions, so that the same balance sheet supports both a continued-funding equilibrium and a self-fulfilling run equilibrium — and can be killed while technically solvent.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:funding_fragility", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "funding_fragility"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "funding_fragility", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P056-C08-U1", "why_it_fits": "Funding Fragility constitutively sustains long, illiquid positions or commitments with shorter revocable funding, so they cannot be reversed or liquidated at par within the funding horizon. This necessarily satisfies the later-expensive-reversal branch [O1,O2,O3,O4]."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Commitments are durable enough that reversal is costly, forbidden, or undesirable.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A greedy procedure can be used heuristically where local choices do not compose well.", "slug": "greedy_algorithm"}], "residual_id": "r:greedy_stepwise_commitment:b031_a08_c5", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b031_a08_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The problem class has known conditions, empirical evidence, or practical experience suggesting local choices often compose well. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The problem class has known conditions, empirical evidence, or practical experience suggesting local choices often compose well."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A greedy procedure can be used heuristically where local choices do not compose well.", "slug": "greedy_algorithm"}], "normalized_requirement": "Evidence or known problem structure suggests local choices usually compose well.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Evidence or known problem structure suggests local choices usually compose well.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The available lookahead, computational budget, human attention, or decision latency is limited.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The available lookahead, computational budget, human attention, or decision latency is limited. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The available lookahead, computational budget, human attention, or decision latency is limited."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "The available lookahead, computational budget, human attention, or decision latency is limited."}, {"display_text": "Hard constraints can be checked locally after each commitment.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: Hard constraints can be checked locally after each commitment. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Hard constraints can be checked locally after each commitment."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Hard constraints can be checked locally after each commitment."}, {"display_text": "The user can tolerate approximation, or can prove that greedy choices are optimal under the relevant assumptions.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: The user can tolerate approximation, or can prove that greedy choices are optimal under the relevant assumptions. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The user can tolerate approximation, or can prove that greedy choices are optimal under the relevant assumptions."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "The user can tolerate approximation, or can prove that greedy choices are optimal under the relevant assumptions."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 31, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-031", "ledger_sha256": "62a6e3e38c511f82fdc630a8a5eccd920a85ccd61198494db6a6881582a86cf4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Group Cohesion Calibration", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:group_cohesion_calibration", "slug": "group_cohesion_calibration"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 4, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 2, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 2 of 4 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A group needs enough internal binding to coordinate, persist, learn, and support members, but its current cohesion is either too weak, too narrow, too brittle, or too coercive. Members may not identify with the group, may not trust one another, may free-ride, may fracture under stress, or may bind around conformity, exclusion, scapegoating, or shared resentment. Without deliberate calibration, cohesion either fails to form when needed or becomes a force that suppresses difference and damages outsiders.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A group needs enough internal binding to coordinate, persist, learn, and support members, but its current cohesion is either too weak, too narrow, too brittle, or too coercive. Members may not identify with the group, may not trust one another, may free-ride, may fracture under stress, or may bind around conformity, exclusion, scapegoating, or shared resentment. Without deliberate calibration, cohesion either fails to form when needed or becomes a force that suppresses difference and damages outsiders."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P056-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O4", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O4", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O4", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must concern members of one group rather than unrelated individuals.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Multiple people are members or nominal participants in the same group.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must preserve the source's presence-versus-absence contrast.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A nominal group link is present while the selected substantive cohesion dimension is absent.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a shared label as the nominal link.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The members share a group label.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires formal membership as the nominal link.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The people share formal membership.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires absence of felt commitment.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The members lack felt commitment to the group.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires absence of trust among members.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The members lack trust.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires absence of mutual support among members.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The members lack mutual support.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires absence of willingness to coordinate.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The members lack willingness to coordinate.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Members share a label or formal membership but lack felt commitment, trust, mutual support, or willingness to coordinate.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Nominally linked group members lack at least one substantive dimension of relational cohesion.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P056-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime describes positive binding forces; their absence is an inverse state.", "slug": "group_cohesion"}], "residual_id": "r:group_cohesion_calibration:b031_a09_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b031_a09_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Members share a label or formal membership but lack felt commitment, trust, mutual support, or willingness to coordinate. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Members share a label or formal membership but lack felt commitment, trust, mutual support, or willingness to coordinate."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime describes positive binding forces; their absence is an inverse state.", "slug": "group_cohesion"}], "normalized_requirement": "Formal members lack commitment, trust, mutual support, or willingness to coordinate.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Formal members lack commitment, trust, mutual support, or willingness to coordinate.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Cohesion measures resistance to fragmentation and does not require weak binding or a current perturbation.", "slug": "group_cohesion"}], "residual_id": "r:group_cohesion_calibration:b031_a09_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b031_a09_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A group is entering stress, conflict, transition, danger, rapid growth, leadership change, or distributed operation where weak cohesion will cause fragmentation. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A group is entering stress, conflict, transition, danger, rapid growth, leadership change, or distributed operation where weak cohesion will cause fragmentation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Cohesion measures resistance to fragmentation and does not require weak binding or a current perturbation.", "slug": "group_cohesion"}], "normalized_requirement": "Stress, conflict, transition, danger, growth, leadership change, or distribution makes weak cohesion likely to fragment the group.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Stress, conflict, transition, danger, growth, leadership change, or distribution makes weak cohesion likely to fragment the group.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Cohesion-driven conformity suppresses dissent and disconfirming evidence in favor of loyalty to premature consensus.", "role_mapping": "Strong cohesion -> conformity pressure; punished dissent or loyalty over evidence -> groupthink information failure.", "slug": "groupthink", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b031_a09_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Current cohesion is strong but unhealthy: dissent is punished, newcomers are excluded, outsiders are demonized, blame is displaced, or loyalty outweighs evidence. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Current cohesion is strong but unhealthy: dissent is punished, newcomers are excluded, outsiders are demonized, blame is displaced, or loyalty outweighs evidence."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Groupthink", "one_liner": "Conformity overrides realism.", "page_ref": "prime:groupthink", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Strong cohesion -> conformity pressure; punished dissent or loyalty over evidence -> groupthink information failure.", "slug": "groupthink", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Cohesion-driven conformity suppresses dissent and disconfirming evidence in favor of loyalty to premature consensus."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Strong cohesion suppresses dissent, excludes newcomers, demonizes outsiders, displaces blame, or places loyalty above evidence.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P056-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must concern collective behavior rather than an isolated individual's action.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A group or collective exhibits behavior at the group level.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must preserve dependence of collective behavior on the named local mechanism; causal generation, governance, or sole determination is not required.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Group-level behavior depends on the branch-specific local mechanism.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must preserve the source's local-versus-centralized control contrast.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The group-level behavior depends on the local mechanism rather than centralized control.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires local relational ties as the mechanism on which group-level behavior depends.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The local mechanism is ties among members.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires proximity as the mechanism on which group-level behavior depends.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The local mechanism is proximity among members.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires local alignment as the mechanism on which group-level behavior depends.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The local mechanism is alignment among members.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires local feedback as the mechanism on which group-level behavior depends.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The local mechanism is feedback among members or units.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Group-level behavior depends on local ties, proximity, alignment, or feedback rather than centralized control, as in distributed teams or biological collectives.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Group-level behavior depends on a local relational mechanism rather than centralized control.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P056-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Relational cohesion can coexist with centralized direction and need not be the sole source of group-level behavior.", "slug": "group_cohesion"}], "residual_id": "r:group_cohesion_calibration:b031_a09_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b031_a09_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Group-level behavior depends on local ties, proximity, alignment, or feedback rather than centralized control, as in distributed teams or biological collectives. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Group-level behavior depends on local ties, proximity, alignment, or feedback rather than centralized control, as in distributed teams or biological collectives."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Tried a moderator who dictates the meaning produced. The exact method excludes that case by requiring probing without leading and an interaction-generated output, so no complete counterexample survives.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Focus group", "one_liner": "Convene six to ten people under a moderator to discuss a topic so that the interaction itself — the counters, reframings, and drawn-out silent voices — excavates collective meanings no individual held as a formed belief.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:focus_group", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "focus_group"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "focus_group", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P056-C10-U1", "why_it_fits": "A Focus Group's defining output is between-participant meaning generated by an interactive feedback cascade, while the moderator enables without directing it. The feedback rather than centralized-control branch [O1,O2,O3,O7] is directly entailed."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A centrally orchestrated group could display a positive interaction residual, so the unguarded candidate is insufficient. Under the no-central-controller guard, the exact member feedback necessarily supplies the local rather than centralized mechanism.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Assembly Bonus Effect", "one_liner": "The small-group finding that on the right task types a group's output exceeds even its best member's predicted performance — a positive interaction residual from mutual error-correction and partial-insight combination that no aggregation of individual scores captures.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:assembly_bonus_effect", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O3"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "no_central_controller_directs_group_interactions", "predicate": "No central controller directs the member-to-member interactions producing the group's output.", "rationale": "Independent SSD review confirms that the exact record plus one atomic candidate-anchored qualifier necessarily satisfies a complete DNF branch without qualifier laundering."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "assembly_bonus_effect"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "no_central_controller_directs_group_interactions"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "assembly_bonus_effect", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P056-C10-U1", "why_it_fits": "Assembly Bonus supplies group-level output that depends on member-to-member error correction and insight combination. The single atomic guard excluding central direction of those already-present interactions supplies only the centralized-control contrast and completes [O1,O2,O3,O7]."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Group-level behavior depends on local ties, proximity, alignment, or feedback rather than centralized control.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A collection of people, teams, units, communities, cohorts, or distributed agents must act as a group rather than as isolated individuals.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: A collection of people, teams, units, communities, cohorts, or distributed agents must act as a group rather than as isolated individuals. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A collection of people, teams, units, communities, cohorts, or distributed agents must act as a group rather than as isolated individuals."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "A collection of people, teams, units, communities, cohorts, or distributed agents must act as a group rather than as isolated individuals."}, {"display_text": "A group must maintain identity while preserving permeability to new members, adjacent groups, criticism, or changing conditions.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A group needs enough internal binding to coordinate, persist, learn, and support members, but its current cohesion is either too weak, too narrow, too brittle, or too coercive. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: A group must maintain identity while preserving permeability to new members, adjacent groups, criticism, or changing conditions. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A group must maintain identity while preserving permeability to new members, adjacent groups, criticism, or changing conditions.", "A group needs enough internal binding to coordinate, persist, learn, and support members, but its current cohesion is either too weak, too narrow, too brittle, or too coercive."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "A group must maintain identity while preserving permeability to new members, adjacent groups, criticism, or changing conditions."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 31, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-031", "ledger_sha256": "62a6e3e38c511f82fdc630a8a5eccd920a85ccd61198494db6a6881582a86cf4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Guarded State Transition", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:guarded_state_transition", "slug": "guarded_state_transition"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 4, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 4 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 1 of 4 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is under-governed movement. The system may have labels for states, but it allows movement between them without checking whether the move is valid. A case can jump from review to approved without required evidence. A work item can close before acceptance. A release can go live before tests or rollback readiness. A person can gain or lose a status without legitimate authority.\n\nThis failure is different from not having state labels. The labels may be visible and familiar. The weakness is at the boundary between states: the crossing point is too easy, too vague, too discretionary, or too disconnected from evidence.\n\nThe underlying tension is movement versus protection. Systems need to keep moving, and overly heavy gates can create bottlenecks. But when movement creates commitments, loose transitions corrupt the meaning of the target state. The archetype works by making the transition boundary explicit and proportionate to risk.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system can move from one state to another in ways that violate readiness, sequence, safety, authority, integrity, or protected invariants. The states may be named, but the transition between them is under-governed."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P056-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must concern a state transition rather than arbitrary physical movement.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A system moves from one state to another.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must preserve that the transition is premature—too early relative to the applicable circumstances or conditions—without requiring readiness or sequence as the particular baseline.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The state transition occurs before its applicable proper point.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must preserve the direction from premature movement to the consequence.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The premature transition causes the branch-specific consequence.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires rework caused by the premature transition.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The consequence is rework.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires harm caused by the premature transition.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The consequence is harm.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Premature movement between states causes rework or harm.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A premature state transition causes rework or harm.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P056-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A state-transition system can permit only valid well-timed moves.", "slug": "state_and_state_transition"}], "residual_id": "r:guarded_state_transition:b031_a10_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b031_a10_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Premature movement causes rework or harm. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Premature movement causes rework or harm."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Tried a washout long enough for complete relaxation before the later condition starts. That removes the residual influence and therefore the Carryover Effect itself; no complete instance preserves the candidate while falsifying premature harmful transition.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Carryover Effect", "one_liner": "The validity threat in crossover and within-subject designs where residual influence from an earlier treatment persists into a later measurement window, biasing the contrast — its magnitude set by the unit's relaxation time against the inter-treatment gap.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:carryover_effect", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "carryover_effect"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "carryover_effect", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P056-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "Carryover Effect requires a later treatment window to begin before the unit returns to baseline, so the premature experimental-state transition causes a contaminated, biased contrast. The harm branch [O1,O2,O3,O5] is directly entailed."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Premature movement between states causes rework or harm.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P056-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must concern authority over a state change or transition.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A system has a state that can be changed.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must preserve authority specifically over or in relation to state change, without requiring that the contest concern who holds it or a particular act such as initiation, approval, or enactment.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The authority at issue concerns a change in the system's state.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must entail active dispute or incompatible claims about the authority.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The authority over state change is contested rather than settled.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must preserve a genuine contest rather than one unopposed authority claim.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "At least two incompatible positions or claims participate in the contest.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}], "predicate": "Authority for state change is contested.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Authority over a system's state change is contested.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P056-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Checks and balances can allocate uncontested authority and need not govern state labels.", "slug": "checks_balances"}], "residual_id": "r:guarded_state_transition:b031_a10_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b031_a10_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Authority for state change is contested. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Authority for state change is contested."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Checks and balances can allocate uncontested authority and need not govern state labels.", "slug": "checks_balances"}], "normalized_requirement": "Authority to change state is contested.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Authority to change state is contested.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P056-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must include an observable model of system state, but the model need not encode transition rules or validity constraints.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A visible model represents the system's state or states.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must entail an actual state-transition event, not merely the possibility of one.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A state transition actually occurs in the system represented by the model.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must preserve actual transition invalidity, without requiring that invalidity to be defined by or encoded in the visible state model.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The occurring transition is invalid under the applicable transition constraints.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must preserve the contrast that model visibility does not prevent the invalid transition.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The invalid transition occurs despite the model being visible.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Invalid transitions happen despite a visible state model.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An invalid state transition occurs despite a visible model of the system's state.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P056-C13-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A state model specifies allowed transitions and need not be violated.", "slug": "state_and_state_transition"}], "residual_id": "r:guarded_state_transition:b031_a10_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b031_a10_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Invalid transitions happen despite a visible state model. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Invalid transitions happen despite a visible state model."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A state model specifies allowed transitions and need not be violated.", "slug": "state_and_state_transition"}], "normalized_requirement": "Invalid transitions occur despite a visible state model.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Invalid transitions occur despite a visible state model.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P056-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must concern exceptions to state-transition rules, not generic exceptions.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A system has rules governing transitions between states.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must relate the exceptions to the governing transition rules.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Exceptions depart from or bypass those transition rules.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must preserve recurrent or high-frequency exceptions.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The exceptions occur frequently rather than as isolated cases.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must preserve that the frequent exceptions are unmanaged because no adequate process governs them; authorization, recording, constraint, and resolution are non-exhaustive possible management functions, not individually sufficient tests.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The frequent exceptions lack adequate governance.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Exceptions to state-transition rules are frequent but unmanaged.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Frequent exceptions to state-transition rules are not adequately governed.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P056-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact framework can have a complete transition relation with no exceptions.", "slug": "state_and_state_transition"}], "residual_id": "r:guarded_state_transition:b031_a10_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b031_a10_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Exceptions are frequent but unmanaged. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Exceptions are frequent but unmanaged."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact framework can have a complete transition relation with no exceptions.", "slug": "state_and_state_transition"}], "normalized_requirement": "Exceptions to transition rules are frequent but unmanaged.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Exceptions to transition rules are frequent but unmanaged.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "DISJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Transitions carry consequence.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Transitions carry consequence. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Transitions carry consequence."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "Transitions carry consequence."}, {"display_text": "Downstream behavior trusts state labels.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This failure is different from not having state labels. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Downstream behavior trusts state labels. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Downstream behavior trusts state labels.", "This failure is different from not having state labels."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Downstream behavior trusts state labels."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 31, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-031", "ledger_sha256": "62a6e3e38c511f82fdc630a8a5eccd920a85ccd61198494db6a6881582a86cf4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Habitus-Sensitive Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:habitus_sensitive_design", "slug": "habitus_sensitive_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is background-dependent legibility. The setting treats one way of acting as neutral, natural, or professional, but that way is actually learned through prior socialization. Participants who already possess the local disposition move smoothly; others hesitate, overcomply, self-exclude, or are judged as lacking fit.\n\nThis can happen in a university seminar, a workplace interview, a benefits office, a museum, a civic forum, or a remote team. In each case, the official rule may be clear while the tacit route to competent participation remains hidden.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A setting treats one socially learned way of participating as neutral, professional, confident, natural, or obvious. People who have internalized that way move easily through the field, while others must guess the hidden code, self-monitor, imitate, self-exclude, or get judged as not fitting even when they have relevant capability."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime is field-specific pre-reflective practical sense acquired through socialization and used to navigate unwritten expectations.", "role_mapping": "Unwritten expectations -> field norms; navigation competence -> practical sense.", "slug": "habitus", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b031_a11_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Success depends on unwritten expectations about how to speak, ask for help, disagree, network, dress, show initiative, or interpret institutional cues. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Success depends on unwritten expectations about how to speak, ask for help, disagree, network, dress, show initiative, or interpret institutional cues."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Habitus", "one_liner": "Internalized dispositions.", "page_ref": "prime:habitus", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Unwritten expectations -> field norms; navigation competence -> practical sense.", "slug": "habitus", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime is field-specific pre-reflective practical sense acquired through socialization and used to navigate unwritten expectations."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Success depends on unwritten expectations for speech, help-seeking, disagreement, networking, dress, initiative, or institutional cues.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P056-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must include an evaluator role applying judgment to people or participation.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Actors serving as evaluators assess people or participants.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must make the terms operative in evaluation rather than merely discuss the vocabulary.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The evaluators use proxy terms as criteria in their judgments.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must preserve indeterminacy of the criteria rather than precisely defined measures.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The evaluative proxy terms are vague or non-operational.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must concern evaluative proxies for participation or capability, not vague language in an unrelated context.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The vague terms stand in for qualities treated as relevant to fit, capability, or readiness in the setting.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Evaluators use vague terms such as fit, presence, professionalism, confidence, polish, maturity, seriousness, or readiness.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Evaluators judge people through vague, non-operational evaluative proxies.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P056-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Habitus can influence action without an evaluator or vague evaluative vocabulary.", "slug": "habitus"}], "residual_id": "r:habitus_sensitive_design:b031_a11_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b031_a11_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Evaluators use vague terms such as fit, presence, professionalism, confidence, polish, maturity, seriousness, or readiness. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Evaluators use vague terms such as fit, presence, professionalism, confidence, polish, maturity, seriousness, or readiness."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Habitus can influence action without an evaluator or vague evaluative vocabulary.", "slug": "habitus"}], "normalized_requirement": "Evaluators use vague proxies such as fit, presence, professionalism, polish, maturity, or readiness.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Evaluators use vague proxies such as fit, presence, professionalism, polish, maturity, or readiness.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Habitus predicts field-conditioned differences but does not require equal underlying capability or one shared entry setting.", "slug": "habitus"}], "residual_id": "r:habitus_sensitive_design:b031_a11_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b031_a11_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Equally capable participants show different rates of help-seeking, contribution, persistence, or recognition after entering the same setting. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Equally capable participants show different rates of help-seeking, contribution, persistence, or recognition after entering the same setting."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Habitus predicts field-conditioned differences but does not require equal underlying capability or one shared entry setting.", "slug": "habitus"}], "normalized_requirement": "Equally capable entrants show different participation or recognition rates in the same setting.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Equally capable entrants show different participation or recognition rates in the same setting.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P057-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying expression must include an existing formal channel for guiding or instructing participants.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An official guidance mechanism for participation in the field exists.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The local codes must govern participation in the setting rather than be incidental customs.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "People actually use local social codes to navigate the field.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail omission or nondisclosure of the operative local codes by the formal guidance.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The existing guidance does not explain those local navigation codes.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires an onboarding process that omits the operative local codes.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The formal guidance mechanism is onboarding.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a formal policy that omits the operative local codes.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The formal guidance mechanism is policy.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires formal instruction that omits the operative local codes.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The formal guidance mechanism is instruction.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Formal onboarding, policy, or instruction exists but does not explain the local codes by which people actually navigate the field.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Existing formal guidance fails to explain the local codes people use to navigate a field.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P057-C01-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Habitus can exist where no formal onboarding or policy is offered.", "slug": "habitus"}], "residual_id": "r:habitus_sensitive_design:b031_a11_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b031_a11_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Formal onboarding, policy, or instruction exists but does not explain the local codes by which people actually navigate the field. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Formal onboarding, policy, or instruction exists but does not explain the local codes by which people actually navigate the field."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Habitus can exist where no formal onboarding or policy is offered.", "slug": "habitus"}], "normalized_requirement": "Formal onboarding or policy omits the local codes by which people navigate the field.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Formal onboarding or policy omits the local codes by which people navigate the field.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P057-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O9"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O10"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include a setting-mediated carrier; the branch-specific obligation must identify one source-listed type.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A setting presents a status-signal carrier to users.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The carrier must communicate or mark belonging status, not merely differ aesthetically.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The carrier signals users' status in relation to the setting.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve both user groups and their opposed native-versus-visitor status.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Some users are signaled as native to the setting while other users are signaled as visitors.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail a comparative belonging distinction rather than one undifferentiated status.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The signal differentiates relative belonging between the native and visitor groups.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires environmental cues to carry the status signal.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The carrier is a environmental cue.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires rituals to carry the status signal.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The carrier is a ritual.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires jargon to carry the status signal.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The carrier is a jargon.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires forms to carry the status signal.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The carrier is a form.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires room layouts to carry the status signal.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "The carrier is a room layout.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires digital interfaces to carry the status signal.", "obligation_id": "O10", "statement": "The carrier is a digital interface.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Environmental cues, rituals, jargon, forms, room layouts, or digital interfaces signal that some users are native to the setting and others are visitors.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A source-listed local carrier signals native-versus-visitor status among users.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P057-C02-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Durable dispositions can reproduce class distinction without a local artifact explicitly signaling visitor status.", "slug": "habitus"}], "residual_id": "r:habitus_sensitive_design:b031_a11_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b031_a11_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Environmental cues, rituals, jargon, forms, room layouts, or digital interfaces signal that some users are native to the setting and others are visitors. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Environmental cues, rituals, jargon, forms, room layouts, or digital interfaces signal that some users are native to the setting and others are visitors."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A complete defensible-space instance cannot omit the environmental distinction between the resident in-group and recognizable outsiders without losing its territorial-legibility mechanism.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Defensible Space", "one_liner": "Configure a built environment — sightlines, threshold cues, a public-to-private zone hierarchy — so each shared space reads as an ownable territory attached to a small resident group, recruiting cheap recognition-based surveillance in place of paid policing.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:defensible_space", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "defensible_space"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "defensible_space", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P057-C02-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record necessarily uses environmental cues to communicate resident-group belonging and outsider status, satisfying the environmental-cue DNF branch."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Environmental cues, rituals, jargon, forms, layouts, or interfaces mark some users as native and others as visitors.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The institution wants inclusion without reducing standards, stereotyping groups, or asking everyone to assimilate to one dominant style.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when people are capable but the setting rewards background-specific fluency: knowing the unwritten code, reading ambiguous cues, using the right self-presentation style, or navigating institutions confidently. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: The institution wants inclusion without reducing standards, stereotyping groups, or asking everyone to assimilate to one dominant style. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The institution wants inclusion without reducing standards, stereotyping groups, or asking everyone to assimilate to one dominant style.", "Use this archetype when people are capable but the setting rewards background-specific fluency: knowing the unwritten code, reading ambiguous cues, using the right self-presentation style, or navigating institutions confidently."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The institution wants inclusion without reducing standards, stereotyping groups, or asking everyone to assimilate to one dominant style."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 31, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-031", "ledger_sha256": "62a6e3e38c511f82fdc630a8a5eccd920a85ccd61198494db6a6881582a86cf4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Hamiltonian Mechanics and Canonical Transformations", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:hamiltonian_mechanics_and_canonical_transformations", "slug": "hamiltonian_mechanics_and_canonical_transformations"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 1, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is representation-induced difficulty. The system may be understood in principle, but its current coordinates make the dynamics coupled, unstable, opaque, or awkward to solve. The analyst wants a simpler coordinate frame, yet simplifying carelessly can destroy the relationships that make the model valid.\n\nThe recurring tension is that the observed variables are often not the most explanatory variables. A safer solution needs both reformulation and proof of preservation.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A dynamic system is represented in variables that obscure its governing structure. Coupled equations, hidden invariants, awkward constraints, or unstable numerical behavior make the original problem hard to reason about, yet a naïve simplification would risk changing the dynamics rather than revealing them."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact mechanical phase space carries a time-parameterized trajectory generated by Hamiltonian flow.", "role_mapping": "Evolving system -> trajectory through phase space.", "slug": "phase_space", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b031_a12_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The system evolves over time or through state transitions rather than being a static classification task. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The system evolves over time or through state transitions rather than being a static classification task."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Phase Space", "one_liner": "All possible system states.", "page_ref": "prime:phase_space", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Evolving system -> trajectory through phase space.", "slug": "phase_space", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact mechanical phase space carries a time-parameterized trajectory generated by Hamiltonian flow."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The system evolves through time or state transitions rather than serving only as a static classification.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Canonical position-momentum and related pairs are linked by symplectic or Fourier structure and govern motion and joint precision.", "role_mapping": "Linked pair -> conjugate coordinates.", "slug": "conjugate_variables", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b031_a12_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Relevant variables come in linked pairs whose relationship affects motion, choice, precision, or constraint. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Relevant variables come in linked pairs whose relationship affects motion, choice, precision, or constraint."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Conjugate Variables", "one_liner": "Interlinked variable pairs.", "page_ref": "prime:conjugate_variables", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Linked pair -> conjugate coordinates.", "slug": "conjugate_variables", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Canonical position-momentum and related pairs are linked by symplectic or Fourier structure and govern motion and joint precision."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Relevant variables form linked pairs whose relation affects motion, precision, or constraint.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P057-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include a represented dynamic system and its current variables or coordinates.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A dynamic system is expressed in an original representation.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail coupling or entanglement among the equations in that representation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The governing equations are entangled rather than separable.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must connect the entanglement to the chosen representation, not merely report difficult equations.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The original representation produces or preserves the equation entanglement.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "The original representation produces entangled equations.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An original representation causes the system's equations to be entangled.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P057-C03-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P057-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include a represented dynamic system and its current variables or coordinates.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A dynamic system is expressed in an original representation.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The difficulty must concern boundary conditions rather than an unrelated part of the system.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Boundary conditions for the represented system are difficult to express, impose, or compute with.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail the direction from representational choice to boundary-condition difficulty.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The original representation makes the boundary conditions difficult.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "The original representation produces hard boundary conditions.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An original representation makes the system's boundary conditions difficult to express or handle.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P057-C03-U2"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P057-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include a represented dynamic system and its current variables or coordinates.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A dynamic system is expressed in an original representation.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve conservation roles rather than generic hidden information.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The system has conserved quantities or invariants relevant to its governing structure.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail opacity or obscuration of the conserved quantities in the current variables.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Those conserved quantities are not transparent in the original representation.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must connect conservation opacity to the representation rather than to absent conservation.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The original representation is what makes the conserved quantities opaque.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "The original representation produces opaque conserved quantities.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An original representation obscures the system's conserved quantities.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P057-C03-U3"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Phase-space coordinates can make equations and conserved quantities transparent.", "slug": "phase_space"}], "residual_id": "r:hamiltonian_mechanics_and_canonical_transformations:b031_a12_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b031_a12_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The original representation produces entangled equations, hard boundary conditions, or opaque conserved quantities. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The original representation produces entangled equations, hard boundary conditions, or opaque conserved quantities."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 3, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 3}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Phase-space coordinates can make equations and conserved quantities transparent.", "slug": "phase_space"}], "normalized_requirement": "The original representation yields entangled equations, difficult boundaries, or opaque conserved quantities.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 3 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The original representation yields entangled equations, difficult boundaries, or opaque conserved quantities.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P057-C04", "dnf": [], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [], "predicate": "There is reason to believe another coordinate frame could make the structure separable, cyclic, reveal conservation, or make it easier to compute.", "resolution": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RESIDUAL", "semantic_scope": "NON_ABSTRACTION", "structural_head": "An alternate coordinate frame may yield one of several analytic or computational benefits.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P057-C04-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A transformation can relabel without improving separability, conservation, or computation.", "slug": "transformation"}], "residual_id": "r:hamiltonian_mechanics_and_canonical_transformations:b031_a12_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b031_a12_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: There is reason to believe another coordinate frame could make the structure separable, cyclic, conserved, or easier to compute. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["There is reason to believe another coordinate frame could make the structure separable, cyclic, conserved, or easier to compute."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RECLASSIFIED", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 1, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A transformation can relabel without improving separability, conservation, or computation.", "slug": "transformation"}], "normalized_requirement": "Another coordinate frame may make the structure separable, cyclic, conserved, or easier to compute.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RECLASSIFIED", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later candidate-blind atomization classified this remainder as a threshold, parameter, materiality test, or other non-abstraction rather than a catalog gap."}, "predicate": "Another coordinate frame may make the structure separable, cyclic, conserved, or easier to compute.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The answer must remain valid when translated back into the original variables.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially appropriate when variables come in meaningful pairs, when phase-space structure matters, when a conserved or invariant relationship is suspected, and when the transformed answer must be translated back into the original variables. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: The answer must remain valid when translated back into the original variables. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The answer must remain valid when translated back into the original variables.", "It is especially appropriate when variables come in meaningful pairs, when phase-space structure matters, when a conserved or invariant relationship is suspected, and when the transformed answer must be translated back into the original variables."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The answer must remain valid when translated back into the original variables."}, {"display_text": "Preserving invariants matters more than producing a merely convenient approximation.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially appropriate when variables come in meaningful pairs, when phase-space structure matters, when a conserved or invariant relationship is suspected, and when the transformed answer must be translated back into the original variables. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: Preserving invariants matters more than producing a merely convenient approximation. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Preserving invariants matters more than producing a merely convenient approximation.", "It is especially appropriate when variables come in meaningful pairs, when phase-space structure matters, when a conserved or invariant relationship is suspected, and when the transformed answer must be translated back into the original variables."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Preserving invariants matters more than producing a merely convenient approximation."}, {"display_text": "The model has enough formal structure to test whether a transformation is legitimate.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Do not use it for ordinary normalization, renaming, visualization, or metaphorical uses of “momentum.” A transformation must preserve structure; otherwise it is only a convenience mechanism. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: The model has enough formal structure to test whether a transformation is legitimate. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The model has enough formal structure to test whether a transformation is legitimate.", "Do not use it for ordinary normalization, renaming, visualization, or metaphorical uses of “momentum.” A transformation must preserve structure; otherwise it is only a convenience mechanism."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "The model has enough formal structure to test whether a transformation is legitimate."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 31, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-031", "ledger_sha256": "62a6e3e38c511f82fdc630a8a5eccd920a85ccd61198494db6a6881582a86cf4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Handoff Standardization", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:handoff_standardization", "slug": "handoff_standardization"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 4, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 2, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 2, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 2 of 4 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a leaky transfer boundary. A sender finishes local work, but the receiver cannot safely or efficiently continue because part of the work’s state has not crossed the boundary.\n\nThe missing state may be factual, such as test results or configuration details. It may be contextual, such as why a decision was made. It may be practical, such as what action is due next. It may be social or institutional, such as who promised what to whom. It may be safety-critical, such as an unresolved risk or exception.\n\nThe recurring tension is that specialization creates boundaries, while continuity requires something to survive those boundaries. The system needs local roles, stages, and teams, but the work cannot be treated as if each local segment starts from zero.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Information, responsibility, material, decision state, or work context is lost, distorted, delayed, duplicated, or orphaned when a flow crosses from one actor, stage, shift, team, or system to another."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P057-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include a transfer boundary within a continuing flow.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A flow contains handoff transitions between actors, stages, shifts, teams, or systems.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern failure incidence with a meaningful transition-versus-nontransition comparison.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Failures occur within the flow and can be located relative to its transitions.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail clustering at the handoff boundary, not isolated failures that merely happen there.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Failure incidence is concentrated at handoff transitions relative to other locations or times.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Failures cluster at handoff transitions.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Failure incidence is disproportionately concentrated at handoff transitions.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P057-C05-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "FMEA can identify failures inside components and does not require a handoff cluster.", "slug": "failure_mode_and_effects_analysis_fmea"}], "residual_id": "r:handoff_standardization:b031_a13_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b031_a13_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Transition failure clusters. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Transition failure clusters"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "FMEA can identify failures inside components and does not require a handoff cluster.", "slug": "failure_mode_and_effects_analysis_fmea"}], "normalized_requirement": "Failures cluster at handoff transitions.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Failures cluster at handoff transitions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P057-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include a transfer with a receiver role rather than generic information storage.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A handoff transfers work, information, material, responsibility, or state to a receiver.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The context must be necessary to interpret or continue the transferred work, not merely useful background.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Successful receipt or continuation of the handoff depends on contextual information.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail that the receiver lacks visibility or access to the context on which the handoff depends.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The required context remains hidden from the receiver.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "A handoff depends on context that remains hidden from the receiver.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A handoff depends on context that is hidden from its receiver.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P057-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A portable context bundle is the remedy state and need not entail a current hidden-context failure.", "slug": "portable_context_bundle"}], "residual_id": "r:handoff_standardization:b031_a13_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b031_a13_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Hidden context dependency. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Hidden context dependency"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A transfer in which the receiver receives all context needed for downstream decisions lacks the impoverishment gap and is not a complete handoff-loss instance.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Handoff Loss", "one_liner": "Locate post-transition failures at the transfer relation itself: work crossing a boundary between actors arrives degraded because a bounded artifact cannot carry the sender's tacit state, so downstream decisions run on an impoverished reconstruction.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:handoff_loss", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "handoff_loss"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "handoff_loss", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P057-C06-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record necessarily contains a receiver whose continuation depends on tacit context that the bounded handoff artifact fails to carry."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A handoff depends on context that remains hidden from the receiver.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P057-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include a handoff transition with parties on its sides.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A handoff transition forms a boundary between parties.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve ownership at the transition; generic responsibility without ownership is insufficient.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "An ownership relation is attached to the handoff transition.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail genuine ambiguity; clearly assigned sole or shared ownership does not satisfy this obligation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The ownership relation at the transition is indeterminate or unclear.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Ownership at the transition is ambiguous.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Ownership at a handoff transition is indeterminate or unclear.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P057-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Mutual exclusion governs concurrent access and need not involve ownership of a handoff.", "slug": "mutual_exclusion"}], "residual_id": "r:handoff_standardization:b031_a13_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b031_a13_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Ambiguous ownership. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Ambiguous ownership"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Mutual exclusion governs concurrent access and need not involve ownership of a handoff.", "slug": "mutual_exclusion"}], "normalized_requirement": "Ownership at the transition is ambiguous.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Ownership at the transition is ambiguous.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P057-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include distinct sender-side and receiver-side or upstream and downstream parties.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "At least two parties occupy different sides of a handoff.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must attach a vocabulary, schema, notation, or representation to each handoff party.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Each party uses a local language or representation for the transferred work or state.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail cross-boundary representational difference, not merely multiple parties using one shared language.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The parties' local languages or representations differ across the handoff.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Parties at the handoff use different local languages.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Parties on opposing sides of a handoff use different local languages or representations.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P057-C08-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Standardization can preempt divergence and does not require currently different local languages.", "slug": "standardization"}], "residual_id": "r:handoff_standardization:b031_a13_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b031_a13_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Different local languages. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Different local languages"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Without the guard, a culturally divergent conversation can occur without transferring work or state, so handoff position is not necessary to the DSA alone.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Intercultural Communication", "one_liner": "The field and practice of managing communicative exchange between parties operating from distinct cultural frames, diagnosing where the same surface utterance carries different presuppositions and repairing the gap below the words that translation alone cannot close.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:intercultural_communication", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "intercultural_exchange_is_handoff", "predicate": "The intercultural exchange occurs as a handoff of work or state between sender and receiver.", "rationale": "Every complete exact-record instance plus the single retained qualifier, if any, necessarily satisfies one complete DNF branch without importing a principal role or second fact."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "intercultural_communication"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The intercultural exchange occurs as a handoff of work or state between sender and receiver."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "intercultural_communication", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P057-C08-U1", "why_it_fits": "Distinct local representations and their divergence are constitutive; one atomic domain restriction places the already-present exchange at a handoff."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Parties at the handoff use different local languages.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "DISJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "High continuity cost.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when the cost of reconstructing context is high. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: High continuity cost. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["High continuity cost", "It is especially useful when the cost of reconstructing context is high."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "High continuity cost"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 31, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-031", "ledger_sha256": "62a6e3e38c511f82fdc630a8a5eccd920a85ccd61198494db6a6881582a86cf4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Harmful Arbitrage Closure", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:harmful_arbitrage_closure", "slug": "harmful_arbitrage_closure"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is an exploitable mismatch. One context treats an action, resource, cost, risk, or obligation differently from another context. Actors can strategically move across that boundary and preserve the upside while shedding the downside. Each context may have a plausible local rationale, but together they create a gap that undermines the intended system.\n\nThis differs from ordinary noncompliance because the actor may technically comply with each local rule while defeating the combined purpose. It also differs from simple externality because the boundary movement itself is central: the actor benefits from choosing the context where the obligation is weakest, least visible, cheapest, or hardest to enforce.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Actors can exploit differences across contexts—such as jurisdictions, markets, product categories, departments, reporting regimes, time windows, or platform channels—in ways that let them capture benefit while shifting costs, risks, obligations, or harms elsewhere. Each local context may look compliant on its own, while cross-boundary movement defeats the intent of the system."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact pattern begins with a cross-boundary discrepancy in price, value, quality, perception, or regulatory regime.", "role_mapping": "Context difference -> fragmented valuation regimes; material gap -> spread.", "slug": "arbitrage_generalized", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b031_a14_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A rule, price, access condition, liability assignment, reporting category, or enforcement threshold differs materially across contexts. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A rule, price, access condition, liability assignment, reporting category, or enforcement threshold differs materially across contexts."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Arbitrage (Generalized)", "one_liner": "Exploiting a discrepancy in price, value, or perception across a boundary that friction keeps from equilibrating, extracting the spread until it closes.", "page_ref": "prime:arbitrage_generalized", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Context difference -> fragmented valuation regimes; material gap -> spread.", "slug": "arbitrage_generalized", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact pattern begins with a cross-boundary discrepancy in price, value, quality, perception, or regulatory regime."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A rule, price, access condition, liability, category, or enforcement threshold differs materially across contexts.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A bridging actor positioned to cross the boundary and exploit the discrepancy is mandatory.", "role_mapping": "Movable activity or value -> bridge operation across regimes.", "slug": "arbitrage_generalized", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b031_a14_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when actors can move activity, value, cost, risk, identity, or obligation across contexts in a way that lets them gain while another party or system bears the cost. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Actors can move activity, value, identity, cost, risk, labor, waste, data, or obligation across that boundary.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Actors can move activity, value, identity, cost, risk, labor, waste, data, or obligation across that boundary.", "Use this archetype when actors can move activity, value, cost, risk, identity, or obligation across contexts in a way that lets them gain while another party or system bears the cost."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Arbitrage (Generalized)", "one_liner": "Exploiting a discrepancy in price, value, or perception across a boundary that friction keeps from equilibrating, extracting the spread until it closes.", "page_ref": "prime:arbitrage_generalized", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Movable activity or value -> bridge operation across regimes.", "slug": "arbitrage_generalized", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A bridging actor positioned to cross the boundary and exploit the discrepancy is mandatory."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Actors can move activity, value, identity, cost, risk, labor, waste, data, or obligation across that boundary.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P057-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include a gain-capturing exploiter rather than diffuse benefit with no actor role.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An exploiting actor captures a gain.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a separate external harm-bearing role; the branch-specific obligation must identify its source-listed type.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A harm bearer distinct from the gaining actor bears harm.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail displacement or externalization, not unrelated benefit and harm.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The actor displaces harm away from itself and onto the external bearer.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the gain-versus-harm allocation contrast across roles.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Gain and harm are allocated asymmetrically between the actor and external bearer.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires affected parties to bear the displaced harm.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The harm bearer is one or more affected parties.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires public systems to bear the displaced harm.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The harm bearer is one or more public systems.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires weaker counterparties to bear the displaced harm.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The harm bearer is one or more weaker counterparties.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires future states to bear the displaced harm.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The harm bearer is one or more future states.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}], "predicate": "The exploiting actor gains while affected parties, public systems, weaker counterparties, or future states bear the displaced harm.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An exploiting actor captures gain while displacing harm onto one of four source-listed external bearer types.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P057-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Generalized arbitrage can compress a benign price spread without imposing harm on weaker or future parties.", "slug": "arbitrage_generalized"}], "residual_id": "r:harmful_arbitrage_closure:b031_a14_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b031_a14_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The actor gains while affected parties, public systems, weaker counterparties, or future states bear the displaced harm. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The actor gains while affected parties, public systems, weaker counterparties, or future states bear the displaced harm."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Generalized arbitrage can compress a benign price spread without imposing harm on weaker or future parties.", "slug": "arbitrage_generalized"}], "normalized_requirement": "The exploiting actor gains while affected parties or future states bear displaced harm.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The exploiting actor gains while affected parties or future states bear displaced harm.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P057-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O9"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O10"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include an arrangement with a purpose; the branch-specific obligation must identify one source-listed type.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An arrangement has an intended purpose.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include a cross-context mismatch rather than ordinary operation within one context.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A mismatch exists across contexts relevant to the arrangement.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail that the mismatch undermines or circumvents the purpose.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The mismatch defeats the arrangement's intended purpose.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve failure of purpose rather than neutral variation.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The intended purpose is not achieved under the mismatch.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a boundary whose purpose is defeated.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The arrangement is a boundary.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a safeguard whose purpose is defeated.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The arrangement is a safeguard.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a price whose purpose is defeated.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The arrangement is a price.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a standard whose purpose is defeated.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The arrangement is a standard.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires an entitlement whose purpose is defeated.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "The arrangement is an entitlement.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires an accountability regime whose purpose is defeated.", "obligation_id": "O10", "statement": "The arrangement is an accountability regime.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "The mismatch defeats the purpose of a boundary, safeguard, price, standard, entitlement, or accountability regime.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A cross-context mismatch defeats the intended purpose of one of six source-listed arrangements.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P057-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Arbitrage can exploit ordinary market price differences without defeating a protective regime.", "slug": "arbitrage_generalized"}], "residual_id": "r:harmful_arbitrage_closure:b031_a14_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b031_a14_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The mismatch defeats the purpose of a boundary, safeguard, price, standard, entitlement, or accountability regime. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The mismatch defeats the purpose of a boundary, safeguard, price, standard, entitlement, or accountability regime."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "If the reported buffer remains usable against the realized disruption, the report-to-reality divergence and therefore safety-stock illusion are absent.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Safety-Stock Illusion", "one_liner": "Recognize that a buffer reported as adequate protection can be useless when disruption arrives, because effective protection is the weakest of five margins — size, location, composition, accessibility, and fit to the realised disruption — not the reported size alone.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:safety_stock_illusion", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "safety_stock_illusion"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "safety_stock_illusion", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P057-C10-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record necessarily entails a safeguard whose protective purpose is defeated by a cross-context readiness mismatch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AUDITED_SHARED_NEGATIVE", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Removing the audit-scope versus inherited-attack-surface mismatch removes the defining silent propagation mechanism, so a complete instance cannot preserve the DSA while the boundary branch is false.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Transfer-Learning Attack", "one_liner": "Vulnerabilities, backdoors, or poisoned representations baked into an upstream pretrained model ride intact into every downstream system built on it, because the downstream team's audit boundary encloses only its new layers while the attack surface spans the whole inherited substrate.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:transfer_learning_attack", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "transfer_learning_attack"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "transfer_learning_attack", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P057-C10-U1", "why_it_fits": "The shared-negative audit rescues this candidate: its exact record expressly defines an audit-boundary mismatch that defeats the boundary's protective review purpose."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Without the guard, a complete ecosystem-mismatch instance can concern an innovation that is none of the six source-listed arrangement types.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Ecosystem Mismatch", "one_liner": "Explain why a technically sound innovation stalls on deployment not by a flaw in the artifact but by the absence of one specific complementary asset its operating context tacitly required — leaving it complete-but-functionally-blocked.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:ecosystem_mismatch", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O6"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "ecosystem_mismatched_innovation_is_safeguard", "predicate": "The innovation deployed in the mismatched ecosystem is a safeguard.", "rationale": "Every complete exact-record instance plus the single retained qualifier, if any, necessarily satisfies one complete DNF branch without importing a principal role or second fact."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "ecosystem_mismatch"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The innovation deployed in the mismatched ecosystem is a safeguard."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "ecosystem_mismatch", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P057-C10-U1", "why_it_fits": "The candidate supplies purpose, mismatch, causal defeat, and nonachievement; one named-type restriction completes the safeguard branch."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The discrepancy defeats the purpose of a safeguard, standard, entitlement, price, or accountability regime.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A cross-boundary spread can be closed by action in one regime and need not defeat all local enforcement.", "slug": "arbitrage_generalized"}], "residual_id": "r:harmful_arbitrage_closure:b031_a14_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b031_a14_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Local enforcement or local compliance is insufficient because the exploit lives between contexts. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Local enforcement or local compliance is insufficient because the exploit lives between contexts."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A cross-boundary spread can be closed by action in one regime and need not defeat all local enforcement.", "slug": "arbitrage_generalized"}], "normalized_requirement": "Local enforcement or compliance is insufficient because the exploit resides between contexts.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Local enforcement or compliance is insufficient because the exploit resides between contexts.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A fix can align or close the harmful route without destroying legitimate contextual variation.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The tension is between preserving legitimate contextual variation and preventing actors from using that variation to shift harm, avoid obligation, or defeat accountability. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: A fix can align or close the harmful route without destroying legitimate contextual variation. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A fix can align or close the harmful route without destroying legitimate contextual variation.", "The tension is between preserving legitimate contextual variation and preventing actors from using that variation to shift harm, avoid obligation, or defeat accountability."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "A fix can align or close the harmful route without destroying legitimate contextual variation."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 31, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-031", "ledger_sha256": "62a6e3e38c511f82fdc630a8a5eccd920a85ccd61198494db6a6881582a86cf4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Harmful Emergence Containment", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:harmful_emergence_containment", "slug": "harmful_emergence_containment"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a mismatch between local reasonableness and global harm. Each local actor or component responds to nearby signals, incentives, constraints, and opportunities. Yet those local responses can aggregate into spam, runs, pile-ons, depletion, congestion, burnout, norm drift, unsafe agent behavior, or other system-level harm.\n\nA purely individual explanation is usually insufficient. Punishing one participant, deleting one incident, or changing one metric may not alter the interaction ecology that reproduces the pattern. A purely centralized response may also be too blunt, because the same decentralized system may be producing innovation, resilience, and useful adaptation.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Many locally reasonable actions combine into a harmful macro-pattern that no individual actor intends."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime requires lower-level constituents and local interactions generating an identifiable higher-level phenomenon.", "role_mapping": "Local actors -> lower-level constituents; aggregate pattern -> emergent phenomenon.", "slug": "emergence", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b031_a15_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Many local actors, components, teams, users, agents, or processes interact often enough for aggregate patterns to matter. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Many local actors, components, teams, users, agents, or processes interact often enough for aggregate patterns to matter."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Emergence", "one_liner": "Complex patterns from simple rules.", "page_ref": "prime:emergence", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Local actors -> lower-level constituents; aggregate pattern -> emergent phenomenon.", "slug": "emergence", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime requires lower-level constituents and local interactions generating an identifiable higher-level phenomenon."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Many local actors or components interact enough for an aggregate pattern to matter.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Emergence guarantees local generation and novelty but not harmful valence.", "slug": "emergence"}], "residual_id": "r:harmful_emergence_containment:b031_a15_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b031_a15_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The harmful system-level pattern is not directly commanded by a central decision; it emerges from local choices, incentives, signals, feedback, imitation, constraints, or adaptive response. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The harmful system-level pattern is not directly commanded by a central decision; it emerges from local choices, incentives, signals, feedback, imitation, constraints, or adaptive response."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Emergence guarantees local generation and novelty but not harmful valence.", "slug": "emergence"}], "normalized_requirement": "A harmful system-level pattern is not centrally commanded but emerges from local choices, signals, feedback, or adaptation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A harmful system-level pattern is not centrally commanded but emerges from local choices, signals, feedback, or adaptation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P057-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require each focal action to satisfy at least one listed property; different actions may satisfy different properties.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "There are multiple focal local actions, and every focal action is individually plausible, legal, useful, rational, or low-risk.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail aggregation or interaction, not mere coexistence.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The focal local actions interact or combine at the aggregate level.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail the direction from combined local actions to a harmful aggregate outcome.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The aggregate interaction of the local actions creates harm.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the individual-versus-aggregate contrast rather than make every action individually harmful.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The per-action favorable or low-concern evaluations contrast with the harmful aggregate result.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Individually plausible, legal, useful, rational, or low-risk local actions aggregate into harm.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Local actions, each individually satisfying at least one listed favorable or low-concern property, interact to create aggregate harm.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P057-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Emergent patterns need not arise from individually plausible actions or produce harm.", "slug": "emergence"}], "residual_id": "r:harmful_emergence_containment:b031_a15_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b031_a15_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The local actions are individually plausible, legal, useful, rational, or low-risk, but their aggregate interaction creates harm. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The local actions are individually plausible, legal, useful, rational, or low-risk, but their aggregate interaction creates harm."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Without the guard, all gating factors can be system states rather than local actions while the latent-path DSA remains fully instantiated.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Latent-Path Activation", "one_liner": "Explain harm that arrives while every factor is individually in-range as a previously inert causal path going live only when a rare conjunction of gating states closes every edge along it at once.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:latent_path_activation", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "gating_factors_are_local_actions", "predicate": "The individually in-range gating factors are local actions.", "rationale": "Every complete exact-record instance plus the single retained qualifier, if any, necessarily satisfies one complete DNF branch without importing a principal role or second fact."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "latent_path_activation"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The individually in-range gating factors are local actions."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "latent_path_activation", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P057-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record supplies individually low-concern factors whose conjunction causes harm; one atomic type restriction makes those existing factors local actions."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "If one prescription is already locally defective or the set creates no additive overexposure, the case is not a complete therapeutic-duplication instance.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Therapeutic Duplication", "one_liner": "The medication-safety failure where uncoordinated prescribers each place a defensible order that lands on the same pharmacologic target, so additive exposure overruns the therapeutic window — a harm that lives in the set of orders, not in any single one.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:therapeutic_duplication", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "therapeutic_duplication"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "therapeutic_duplication", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P057-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every exact-record instance contains multiple individually defensible orders whose interaction at set level creates harmful additive exposure."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Individually plausible, legal, useful, rational, or low-risk actions aggregate into harm.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P057-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include a harmful pattern and a response limited to observing or detecting it.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A harmful pattern is present and subject to a passive detection response.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail inadequacy of detection alone, not merely the existence of monitoring.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Passive detection is insufficient to address the pattern.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve active growth in lock-in or persistence rather than a static established state.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The harmful pattern is becoming increasingly entrenched over time.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail the direction from entrenchment dynamics to response insufficiency.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The increasing entrenchment is why passive detection is insufficient.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Passive detection is insufficient because the harmful pattern is becoming entrenched.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A harmful pattern's increasing entrenchment makes passive detection insufficient.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P057-C12-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P057-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include a harmful pattern and a response limited to observing or detecting it.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A harmful pattern is present and subject to a passive detection response.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail inadequacy of detection alone, not merely the existence of monitoring.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Passive detection is insufficient to address the pattern.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve acceleration rather than constant-rate continuation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The harmful pattern's rate or intensity is increasing over time.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail the direction from acceleration to response insufficiency.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The acceleration is why passive detection is insufficient.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Passive detection is insufficient because the harmful pattern is accelerating.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A harmful pattern's acceleration makes passive detection insufficient.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P057-C12-U2"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P057-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include a harmful pattern and a response limited to observing or detecting it.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A harmful pattern is present and subject to a passive detection response.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail inadequacy of detection alone, not merely the existence of monitoring.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Passive detection is insufficient to address the pattern.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve diffusion or expansion beyond the pattern's prior extent.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The harmful pattern is spreading to additional locations, actors, cases, or states.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail the direction from diffusion to response insufficiency.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The spread is why passive detection is insufficient.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Passive detection is insufficient because the harmful pattern is spreading.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A harmful pattern's spread makes passive detection insufficient.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P057-C12-U3"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P057-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include a harmful pattern and a response limited to observing or detecting it.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A harmful pattern is present and subject to a passive detection response.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail inadequacy of detection alone, not merely the existence of monitoring.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Passive detection is insufficient to address the pattern.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must connect the pattern to generated exposure rather than unrelated background risk.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The harmful pattern creates exposure for affected actors, systems, or future states.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the source's unacceptable-exposure threshold, not merely nonzero exposure.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The created exposure exceeds an acceptable threshold.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail the direction from threshold-exceeding exposure to response insufficiency.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The unacceptable exposure is why passive detection is insufficient.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Passive detection is insufficient because the harmful pattern is creating unacceptable exposure.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A harmful pattern's creation of unacceptable exposure makes passive detection insufficient.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P057-C12-U4"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Containment can address a static bounded hazard and need not involve an emergent accelerating pattern.", "slug": "containment"}], "residual_id": "r:harmful_emergence_containment:b031_a15_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b031_a15_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A passive detection response is insufficient because the pattern is becoming entrenched, accelerating, spreading, or creating unacceptable exposure. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A passive detection response is insufficient because the pattern is becoming entrenched, accelerating, spreading, or creating unacceptable exposure."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PARTIALLY_DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Without the guard, the structural vigilance dependency can exist under a regime that still accepts the residual exposure despite the weakened barrier.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Operator-Vigilance Dependency", "one_liner": "Name the safety configuration in which a human operator's unaided sustained attention is the final live barrier against a severe hazard, under exactly the monotony and rarity that the vigilance literature says will degrade that attention — worsened, not helped, by more upstream automation.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:operator_vigilance_dependency", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O4", "O5"], "guard_type": "THRESHOLD_CROSSING", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "vigilance_residual_exposure_exceeds_safety_threshold", "predicate": "The residual exposure left by degraded operator vigilance exceeds the applicable safety threshold.", "rationale": "Every complete exact-record instance plus the single retained qualifier, if any, necessarily satisfies one complete DNF branch without importing a principal role or second fact."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "operator_vigilance_dependency"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The residual exposure left by degraded operator vigilance exceeds the applicable safety threshold."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "operator_vigilance_dependency", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P057-C12-U4", "why_it_fits": "Passive detection, its predictable insufficiency, and resulting severe-hazard exposure are constitutive; one threshold fact completes unacceptability and its consequence."}], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 4, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 1, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 3}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Containment can address a static bounded hazard and need not involve an emergent accelerating pattern.", "slug": "containment"}], "normalized_requirement": "Passive detection is insufficient because the harmful pattern is entrenching, accelerating, spreading, or raising exposure.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "PARTIAL_EXISTING_DSA_GROUNDING", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation grounded 1 of 4 eligible atomic units; the remaining unit or units stayed open."}, "predicate": "Passive detection is insufficient because the harmful pattern is entrenching, accelerating, spreading, or raising exposure.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Direct centralized control would be too blunt, too slow, too costly, or too destructive of legitimate local adaptation.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A purely centralized response may also be too blunt, because the same decentralized system may be producing innovation, resilience, and useful adaptation. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: Direct centralized control would be too blunt, too slow, too costly, or too destructive of legitimate local adaptation. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Direct centralized control would be too blunt, too slow, too costly, or too destructive of legitimate local adaptation.", "A purely centralized response may also be too blunt, because the same decentralized system may be producing innovation, resilience, and useful adaptation."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Direct centralized control would be too blunt, too slow, too costly, or too destructive of legitimate local adaptation."}, {"display_text": "The system can identify at least some local drivers or interaction pathways that can be modified.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The draft requires evidence or a strong hypothesis that local interactions are producing a harmful emergent pattern. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: The system can identify at least some local drivers or interaction pathways that can be modified. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The system can identify at least some local drivers or interaction pathways that can be modified.", "The draft requires evidence or a strong hypothesis that local interactions are producing a harmful emergent pattern."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The system can identify at least some local drivers or interaction pathways that can be modified."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 31, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-031", "ledger_sha256": "62a6e3e38c511f82fdc630a8a5eccd920a85ccd61198494db6a6881582a86cf4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Head-of-Line Blocking Relief", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:head_of_line_blocking_relief", "slug": "head_of_line_blocking_relief"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 2, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is inherited delay. A blocked front item converts its own delay into delay for every item behind it. The queue appears to be respecting order, but the order has become an accidental coupling between unrelated items.\n\nThis creates a convoy effect: later work waits not because it is hard, risky, low priority, or resource-constrained, but because the front item cannot move. Over time, operators may create hidden side channels, manually skip difficult items, or let exception work disappear.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A queue, pipeline, or staged workflow has a front item that cannot proceed, while later items could be served; the queue discipline treats front position as absolute, so one blocked item delays the entire waiting set."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P057-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include a path or queue through which work items receive service.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A service path processes or advances multiple work items.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail first-in-first-out precedence rather than optional FIFO behavior.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The path orders service strictly by item arrival position.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail an operative service discipline, not merely a possible configuration.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The strict FIFO discipline is actually in use.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "A strict FIFO service path is in use.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A service path enforces strict first-in-first-out ordering.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P057-C13-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P057-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include a path or workflow through which work items progress.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A service path processes or advances multiple work items.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail a predetermined order that items cannot freely bypass.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The path enforces a fixed order of service or progression.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail an operative service discipline, not merely a possible configuration.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The fixed-order discipline is actually in use.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "A fixed-order service path is in use.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A service path enforces a fixed service order.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P057-C13-U2"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P057-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include staged progression of work rather than an unordered collection.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A service path or workflow advances work through stages.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail that work cannot advance past a stage without satisfying or clearing its gate.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Progression is gated at stage boundaries.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail an operative gating arrangement, not merely a possible design.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The stage-gated path is actually in use.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "A stage-gated service path is in use.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A service path requires work to pass through stage gates.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P057-C13-U3"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P057-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include a service flow carrying work through a path.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A service path processes or advances work items.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail a single-lane topology rather than merely limited capacity across several lanes.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The path provides exactly one service lane.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail an operative service path, not merely a feasible topology.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The single-lane path is actually in use.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "A single-lane service path is in use.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A service path restricts work to a single service lane.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P057-C13-U4"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Topographic forcing can channel a physical or abstract flow without imposing FIFO, stage gates, or a single service head.", "slug": "topographic_forcing"}], "residual_id": "r:head_of_line_blocking_relief:b032_a01_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b032_a01_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Do not use it when strict order is required by law, safety, dependency, fairness commitment, or technical correctness. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A strict FIFO, fixed-order, stage-gated, or single-lane service path is in use.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["a strict FIFO, fixed-order, stage-gated, or single-lane service path is in use", "Do not use it when strict order is required by law, safety, dependency, fairness commitment, or technical correctness."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PARTIALLY_DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A shipment not subject to an operative sovereign clearance gate cannot instantiate customs-clearance delay; a mere transport delay is explicitly excluded.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Customs-Clearance Delay", "one_liner": "The cross-border failure mode in which a physically ready shipment is held immobile because a sovereign clearance authority has not yet issued the release token — a permission-gate bottleneck immune to transport remedies, with queueing dynamics and a linear-then-catastrophic cost.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:customs_clearance_delay", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "customs_clearance_delay"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "customs_clearance_delay", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P057-C13-U3", "why_it_fits": "Every exact-record instance advances a shipment through an administrative state machine whose release gate currently blocks progression."}], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 4, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 1, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 3}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Topographic forcing can channel a physical or abstract flow without imposing FIFO, stage gates, or a single service head.", "slug": "topographic_forcing"}], "normalized_requirement": "A strict FIFO, fixed-order, stage-gated, or single-lane service path is in use.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "PARTIAL_EXISTING_DSA_GROUNDING", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation grounded 1 of 4 eligible atomic units; the remaining unit or units stayed open."}, "predicate": "A strict FIFO, fixed-order, stage-gated, or single-lane service path is in use.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P057-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include a front item whose position is defined by an ordered service discipline.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An item occupies the head position of an ordered queue or service path.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail actual blockage rather than merely slower service.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The head item cannot currently proceed.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require absent prerequisite input for the head item.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Input required by the head item is missing.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must connect the absent input to the inability to proceed.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The missing input causes the head-item blockage.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "The head item is blocked by missing input.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A queue or service-path head item cannot proceed because required input is missing.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P057-C14-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P057-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include a front item whose position is defined by an ordered service discipline.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An item occupies the head position of an ordered queue or service path.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail actual blockage rather than merely slower service.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The head item cannot currently proceed.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require unavailable service or processing capacity for the head item.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Capacity required to serve the head item is unavailable.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must connect unavailable capacity to the inability to proceed.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The capacity unavailability causes the head-item blockage.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "The head item is blocked by unavailable capacity.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A queue or service-path head item cannot proceed because required capacity is unavailable.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P057-C14-U2"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P057-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include a front item whose position is defined by an ordered service discipline.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An item occupies the head position of an ordered queue or service path.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail actual blockage rather than merely slower service.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The head item cannot currently proceed.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include a lock-mediated exclusion relation affecting the head item.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A lock denies the head item access to a resource or state it requires.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must connect the lock to the inability to proceed.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The lock exclusion causes the head-item blockage.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "The head item is blocked by a lock.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A queue or service-path head item cannot proceed because a lock excludes it from a required resource.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P057-C14-U3"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P057-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include a front item whose position is defined by an ordered service discipline.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An item occupies the head position of an ordered queue or service path.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail actual blockage rather than merely slower service.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The head item cannot currently proceed.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include an exception condition requiring handling or clearance.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The head item is subject to an unresolved exception.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must connect the unresolved exception to the inability to proceed.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The exception state causes the head-item blockage.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "The head item is blocked by an exception.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A queue or service-path head item cannot proceed because it is in an unresolved exception state.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P057-C14-U4"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P057-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include a front item whose position is defined by an ordered service discipline.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An item occupies the head position of an ordered queue or service path.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail actual blockage rather than merely slower service.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The head item cannot currently proceed.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a prerequisite dependency specific to the head item.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The head item depends on another item, state, action, or decision that is unresolved.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must connect the dependency to the inability to proceed.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The unresolved dependency causes the head-item blockage.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "The head item is blocked by a dependency.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A queue or service-path head item cannot proceed because a required dependency is unresolved.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P057-C14-U5"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P057-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include a front item whose position is defined by an ordered service discipline.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An item occupies the head position of an ordered queue or service path.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve long service time rather than an immediate failure.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The service action for the head item runs for an extended duration.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail prolonged occupation of the head rather than background work with no queue effect.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The head item remains unable to clear the head position while its service action continues.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must connect extended service duration to the inability to clear the head.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The long-running service action causes the prolonged head blockage.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "The head item is blocked by a long-running service action.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A queue or service-path head item remains at the front because its service action is long-running.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P057-C14-U6"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P057-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include a front item whose position is defined by an ordered service discipline.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An item occupies the head position of an ordered queue or service path.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail actual blockage rather than merely slower service.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The head item cannot currently proceed.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve latency in a prerequisite decision affecting the head item.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A decision required for the head item is delayed.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must connect delayed decision making to the inability to proceed.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The decision delay causes the head-item blockage.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "The head item is blocked by a delayed decision.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A queue or service-path head item cannot proceed because a required decision is delayed.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P057-C14-U7"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A permission hold need not be at the head of an ordered queue and covers only one of the listed blocking causes.", "slug": "permission_gated_hold"}], "residual_id": "r:head_of_line_blocking_relief:b032_a01_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b032_a01_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: the head item is blocked by missing input, unavailable capacity, a lock, an exception, a dependency, a long-running service action, or a decision delay. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["the head item is blocked by missing input, unavailable capacity, a lock, an exception, a dependency, a long-running service action, or a decision delay"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PARTIALLY_DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Without the guard, a complete backorder can occupy a later fulfillment-queue position, leaving the source head-item obligation false.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Backorder", "one_liner": "The fulfilment arrangement in which an order is accepted as a binding obligation despite a stock-out, becoming a queued claim against future supply tracked in a visible ledger and clocked against an estimated resupply, rather than being refused as a lost sale.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:backorder", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "QUANTIFIER_BINDING", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "backorder_is_fulfillment_queue_head", "predicate": "The backordered order occupies the head position in the ordered fulfillment queue.", "rationale": "Every complete exact-record instance plus the single retained qualifier, if any, necessarily satisfies one complete DNF branch without importing a principal role or second fact."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "backorder"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The backordered order occupies the head position in the ordered fulfillment queue."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "backorder", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P057-C14-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record supplies actual missing-stock blockage and causality; one atomic ordinal restriction supplies only the head position."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Without the guard, a complete customs-clearance delay can affect a shipment behind earlier items, so head position is not necessary.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Customs-Clearance Delay", "one_liner": "The cross-border failure mode in which a physically ready shipment is held immobile because a sovereign clearance authority has not yet issued the release token — a permission-gate bottleneck immune to transport remedies, with queueing dynamics and a linear-then-catastrophic cost.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:customs_clearance_delay", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "QUANTIFIER_BINDING", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "delayed_shipment_is_clearance_queue_head", "predicate": "The delayed shipment occupies the head position of its ordered clearance queue.", "rationale": "Every complete exact-record instance plus the single retained qualifier, if any, necessarily satisfies one complete DNF branch without importing a principal role or second fact."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "customs_clearance_delay"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The delayed shipment occupies the head position of its ordered clearance queue."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "customs_clearance_delay", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P057-C14-U7", "why_it_fits": "The exact record supplies decision-gate delay, blockage, and causality; one atomic ordinal restriction supplies only the head position."}], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 7, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 2, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 5}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A permission hold need not be at the head of an ordered queue and covers only one of the listed blocking causes.", "slug": "permission_gated_hold"}], "normalized_requirement": "The head item is blocked by input, capacity, lock, exception, dependency, service time, or delayed decision.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "PARTIAL_EXISTING_DSA_GROUNDING", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation grounded 2 of 7 eligible atomic units; the remaining unit or units stayed open."}, "predicate": "The head item is blocked by input, capacity, lock, exception, dependency, service time, or delayed decision.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A held item can coexist with later work that depends on it or cannot safely pass.", "slug": "permission_gated_hold"}], "residual_id": "r:head_of_line_blocking_relief:b032_a01_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b032_a01_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: later items do not depend on the blocked head item and could be safely advanced. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["later items do not depend on the blocked head item and could be safely advanced"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A held item can coexist with later work that depends on it or cannot safely pass.", "slug": "permission_gated_hold"}], "normalized_requirement": "Later queued items are independent of the blocked head and could advance safely.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Later queued items are independent of the blocked head and could advance safely.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P057-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must include capacity downstream of a queue or waiting set.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A downstream stage has service or processing capacity.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail nonempty queued work rather than a drained system.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Work items remain queued while that downstream capacity exists.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve simultaneity rather than compare different operating periods.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The queued work and unused downstream capacity occur at the same time.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires no use of the relevant downstream capacity.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The downstream capacity is idle.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires partial underutilization rather than complete idleness or full use.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The downstream capacity is used below its available level.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}], "predicate": "Downstream capacity is idle or underused even though queued work remains.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Downstream service capacity is not fully utilized while work remains queued.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P057-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A blockage can store flow while downstream capacity is fully used by other work.", "slug": "blockage_release_dynamics"}], "residual_id": "r:head_of_line_blocking_relief:b032_a01_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b032_a01_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: downstream capacity is idle or underused even though queued work remains. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["downstream capacity is idle or underused even though queued work remains"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A blockage can store flow while downstream capacity is fully used by other work.", "slug": "blockage_release_dynamics"}], "normalized_requirement": "Downstream capacity is idle or underused while queued work remains.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Downstream capacity is idle or underused while queued work remains.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P058-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must include an operative official queue or equivalent ordered work path.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An official queue or ordered workflow governs the service order of work items.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail absence of the readiness-state distinction in the official queue.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The official queue cannot distinguish blocked items from ready items.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must include worker-initiated manual compensation outside the queue's normal discipline.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Workers take a manual action that bypasses or overrides the official queue order.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the direction from the queue defect to the compensatory behavior.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The queue's inability to distinguish readiness states causes the manual bypass behavior.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires workers to skip the blocked item in the official order.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The manual bypass action skips a blocked item.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires workers to select ready items out of the official order.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The manual bypass action cherry-picks ready work.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires an alternate work channel outside the official queue.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The manual bypass action creates a side channel.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Workers manually bypass official queue order by skipping, cherry-picking, or creating side channels because the queue cannot distinguish blocked from ready work.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Workers manually bypass an official queue because it cannot distinguish blocked from ready items.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P058-C01-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A bypassed safeguard can involve deliberate evasion with no queue or readiness distinction.", "slug": "bypassed_safeguard"}], "residual_id": "r:head_of_line_blocking_relief:b032_a01_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b032_a01_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: workers manually skip, cherry-pick, or invent side channels because the official queue cannot distinguish blocked from ready items. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["workers manually skip, cherry-pick, or invent side channels because the official queue cannot distinguish blocked from ready items"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A bypassed safeguard can involve deliberate evasion with no queue or readiness distinction.", "slug": "bypassed_safeguard"}], "normalized_requirement": "Workers manually skip, cherry-pick, or create side channels because the official queue cannot distinguish blocked from ready work.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Workers manually skip, cherry-pick, or create side channels because the official queue cannot distinguish blocked from ready work.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P058-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must include a front-position item and a following waiting set in one ordered flow.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An ordered queue contains one front item and multiple later items.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail delay at the front rather than delay originating independently downstream.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The front item is delayed or unable to clear its position.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve propagation from one front item to multiple following items.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Many later items inherit delay from the one front item.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must connect the propagated delay causally to the front item.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The front-item delay causes the later-item delays.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail a distributional worsening, not merely nonzero waiting.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The resulting waiting-time distribution is worse than it would be without the propagated front delay.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Many later items inherit the delay of one front item, worsening the waiting-time distribution.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Delay at one queue-front item propagates to many later items and worsens their waiting-time distribution.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P058-C02-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Starvation delays one item while others advance; head-of-line blocking delays later items behind one front item.", "slug": "starvation"}], "residual_id": "r:head_of_line_blocking_relief:b032_a01_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b032_a01_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: waiting-time distribution worsens because many items inherit the delay of one front item. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["waiting-time distribution worsens because many items inherit the delay of one front item"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Starvation delays one item while others advance; head-of-line blocking delays later items behind one front item.", "slug": "starvation"}], "normalized_requirement": "Many items inherit the delay of one front item, worsening the waiting-time distribution.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Many items inherit the delay of one front item, worsening the waiting-time distribution.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 32, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-032", "ledger_sha256": "6023271b834e118e764634c13e127bda6ccc326dbb7e7c996ed3bfa39842c2b9"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Height-Stratified Stability–Form Partition", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:height_stratified_stability_form_partition", "slug": "height_stratified_stability_form_partition"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 2 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 2}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Uniform material selection couples the amount of stabilizing mass to the whole form.\nReducing total mass then sacrifices stability, while adding stability makes every\nregion unnecessarily dense.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Uniform material distribution couples stabilizing mass to the entire form, making low total mass incompatible with the required stability or peripheral loading."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "This branch preserves the complete remedy-free diagnostic route; goals, feasibility clauses, gates, deployment constraints, and supporting context remain outside the DNF."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "EXT001-C052", "dnf": [["EXT001-U052-O1"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"obligation_id": "EXT001-U052-O1", "predicate": "Uniform material selection makes the amount of stabilizing mass scale with the whole form."}], "predicate": "Uniform material selection makes the amount of stabilizing mass scale with the whole form.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Uniform material selection makes the amount of stabilizing mass scale with the whole form.", "unit_id": "EXT001-U052"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"catalog_exhaustion": "CONDITION_LEVEL", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Uniform material selection makes the amount of stabilizing mass scale with the whole form.", "slug": "microstructure"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Uniform material selection makes the amount of stabilizing mass scale with the whole form.", "slug": "porosity"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Uniform material selection makes the amount of stabilizing mass scale with the whole form.", "slug": "balance"}], "residual_id": "EXT001:height_stratified_stability_form_partition:C01", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding."}}, "condition_id": "ext001_height_stratified_stability_form_partition_a01", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: Uniform material selection makes the amount of stabilizing mass scale with the whole form.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Uniform material selection makes the amount of stabilizing mass scale with the whole form."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Uniform material selection makes the amount of stabilizing mass scale with the whole form.", "slug": "microstructure"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Uniform material selection makes the amount of stabilizing mass scale with the whole form.", "slug": "porosity"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Uniform material selection makes the amount of stabilizing mass scale with the whole form.", "slug": "balance"}], "normalized_requirement": "Uniform material selection makes the amount of stabilizing mass scale with the whole form.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Uniform material selection makes the amount of stabilizing mass scale with the whole form.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "EXT001-C053", "dnf": [["EXT001-U053-O1"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"obligation_id": "EXT001-U053-O1", "predicate": "The object requires low-centered stability or peripheral loading while total mass, inertia, cost, or handling burden must remain low."}], "predicate": "The object requires low-centered stability or peripheral loading while total mass, inertia, cost, or handling burden must remain low.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "The object requires low-centered stability or peripheral loading while total mass, inertia, cost, or handling burden must remain low.", "unit_id": "EXT001-U053"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"catalog_exhaustion": "CONDITION_LEVEL", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The object requires low-centered stability or peripheral loading while total mass, inertia, cost, or handling burden must remain low.", "slug": "sacrifice_periphery_to_defend_core"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The object requires low-centered stability or peripheral loading while total mass, inertia, cost, or handling burden must remain low.", "slug": "zero_force_null_baseline"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The object requires low-centered stability or peripheral loading while total mass, inertia, cost, or handling burden must remain low.", "slug": "inertia"}], "residual_id": "EXT001:height_stratified_stability_form_partition:C02", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding."}}, "condition_id": "ext001_height_stratified_stability_form_partition_a02", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: The object requires low-centered stability or peripheral loading while total mass, inertia, cost, or handling burden must remain low.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The object requires low-centered stability or peripheral loading while total mass, inertia, cost, or handling burden must remain low."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The object requires low-centered stability or peripheral loading while total mass, inertia, cost, or handling burden must remain low.", "slug": "sacrifice_periphery_to_defend_core"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The object requires low-centered stability or peripheral loading while total mass, inertia, cost, or handling burden must remain low.", "slug": "zero_force_null_baseline"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The object requires low-centered stability or peripheral loading while total mass, inertia, cost, or handling burden must remain low.", "slug": "inertia"}], "normalized_requirement": "The object requires low-centered stability or peripheral loading while total mass, inertia, cost, or handling burden must remain low.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The object requires low-centered stability or peripheral loading while total mass, inertia, cost, or handling burden must remain low.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Material density or structure can vary by height or region.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: Material density or structure can vary by height or region. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Material density or structure can vary by height or region.", "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Material density or structure can vary by height or region."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"candidate_ledger_sha256": "96f72d2139077fd57bf795048ebef33b3fd574b20963170080ec916b5b3b92fe", "extension_id": "new-archetypes-extension-001", "ledger_id": "prime-production-v1.2-extension-001", "ledger_sha256": "9644520614744632d1d36da44b1acd77ce432852c6083eb871203521c166efce"}, "base_projection_sha256": "841e0c7f3cb8e8054475ad29a8a14745a416b4fc115559a44878b94292e673ec", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "ca09ed9fe1598ce7072755b530de5553f5ee0a7cd64ae82d9e4a4e2149a37788", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Helplessness Reversal", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:helplessness_reversal", "slug": "helplessness_reversal"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 5, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is learned disconnection between action and outcome. Prior experience taught the actor that trying does not change anything, so new opportunities are interpreted through the old pattern. Even when a current lever exists, the actor may not perceive it as real.\n\nThis creates a self-protective loop: action feels futile, so the actor does not act; because the actor does not act, no new evidence appears; because no new evidence appears, futility remains plausible.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A person, team, learner, community, or organization stops acting because repeated blocked, arbitrary, futile, or uncontrollable experiences have made current opportunities for control hard to perceive or trust."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P058-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must include an actor's purposive attempts rather than passive exposure alone.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An actor made attempts or efforts intended to affect an outcome.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve recurrence rather than one isolated failure or override.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The adverse action-outcome history contains repeated episodes.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires genuine effort followed by failure to achieve the intended outcome.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The actor's attempts failed despite effort.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a decision outside the actor to displace or nullify the attempt.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "External decisions overrode the actor's attempts.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires lack of legibility or explanation for the override.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The overriding decisions were opaque to the actor.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "An actor's past attempts repeatedly failed despite effort or were overridden by opaque decisions.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An actor has a repeated history of effortful failure or opaque override of its attempts.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P058-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Self-handicapping creates obstacles before evaluation and does not require genuine repeated failure or opaque override.", "slug": "self_handicapping"}], "residual_id": "r:helplessness_reversal:b032_a02_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b032_a02_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Past attempts repeatedly failed despite effort or were overridden by opaque decisions. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Past attempts repeatedly failed despite effort or were overridden by opaque decisions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Self-handicapping creates obstacles before evaluation and does not require genuine repeated failure or opaque override.", "slug": "self_handicapping"}], "normalized_requirement": "Past efforts repeatedly failed or were overridden by opaque decisions.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Past efforts repeatedly failed or were overridden by opaque decisions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Self-control concerns regulation of one's impulses and does not entail an external opportunity to alter the system.", "slug": "self_control"}], "residual_id": "r:helplessness_reversal:b032_a02_c2", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b032_a02_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The current situation now contains at least one real control opportunity. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The current situation now contains at least one real control opportunity."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Self-control concerns regulation of one's impulses and does not entail an external opportunity to alter the system.", "slug": "self_control"}], "normalized_requirement": "The present situation contains at least one real control opportunity.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The present situation contains at least one real control opportunity.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P058-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must include communicative expression of an efficacy, voice, or control belief; a silent, unexpressed belief is insufficient.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An actor expresses or describes a belief about its ability to affect outcomes or be heard.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve globalized scope rather than a claim about one failed action.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The belief generalizes beyond a specific attempt or local episode.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail a negative control or efficacy conclusion.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The generalized belief treats effective action, influence, or resistance as futile.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Actors describe the situation globally as one in which action, voice, or resistance is futile.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An actor expresses a globalized belief that its action or voice cannot produce effective control.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P058-C04-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A self-fulfilling expectation can be optimistic or local and need not express global helplessness.", "slug": "self_fulfilling_prophecy"}], "residual_id": "r:helplessness_reversal:b032_a02_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b032_a02_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Actors describe the situation globally: nothing works, no one listens, trying is pointless, or the system always wins. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Actors describe the situation globally: nothing works, no one listens, trying is pointless, or the system always wins."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A self-fulfilling expectation can be optimistic or local and need not express global helplessness.", "slug": "self_fulfilling_prophecy"}], "normalized_requirement": "Actors generalize that nothing works, no one listens, trying is pointless, or the system always wins.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Actors generalize that nothing works, no one listens, trying is pointless, or the system always wins.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P058-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must include an action and a result about which feedback could exist.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An actor takes an action whose result could be observed or reported.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve feedback about the actor's intervention rather than unrelated information.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A feedback channel would connect the action or its result back to the actor.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail feedback absence, not merely low quality or delay.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "No such feedback is delivered or available to the actor.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Feedback relevant to an actor's action is missing.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An actor receives no feedback about the result of its action.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P058-C05-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P058-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must include an action and feedback concerning its result.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An actor takes an action for which result feedback is relevant.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an action-specific feedback relation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Feedback about the action or result is generated or delivered to the actor.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail delayed feedback rather than permanent absence or immediate delivery.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The feedback arrives later than the normal or decision-relevant evaluation time.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "Feedback about an actor's action is delayed.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Feedback about an actor's action arrives later than the relevant evaluation interval.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P058-C05-U2"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P058-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must include delivered action-relevant feedback and a receiving actor.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An actor receives feedback concerning an action or its result.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail distrust of the feedback rather than mere uncertainty about the outcome.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The actor does not trust the feedback's reliability or credibility.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Feedback about an actor's action is not trusted.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An actor does not trust feedback concerning the result of its action.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P058-C05-U3"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P058-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must include an intervention and a subsequent feedback signal or outcome.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An actor takes an action and observes feedback or an outcome afterward.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail failure of action-to-outcome attribution, not merely delayed or distrusted feedback.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The actor cannot attribute the observed feedback or outcome to its own action.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Feedback cannot be attributed to the actor's action.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An actor cannot determine whether observed feedback resulted from its own action.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P058-C05-U4"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Outcome expectancy can be well calibrated and does not require missing or untrusted feedback.", "slug": "expectancy_mediated_outcome"}], "residual_id": "r:helplessness_reversal:b032_a02_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b032_a02_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Feedback is missing, delayed, untrusted, or not attributable to the actor’s action. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Feedback is missing, delayed, untrusted, or not attributable to the actor’s action."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 4, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 4}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Outcome expectancy can be well calibrated and does not require missing or untrusted feedback.", "slug": "expectancy_mediated_outcome"}], "normalized_requirement": "Feedback is absent, delayed, untrusted, or not attributable to the actor's action.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 4 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Feedback is absent, delayed, untrusted, or not attributable to the actor's action.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Self-handicapping may create a small private obstacle and does not entail an oversized reentry action.", "slug": "self_handicapping"}], "residual_id": "r:helplessness_reversal:b032_a02_c5", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b032_a02_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The next action is too large, public, risky, or ambiguous for a first re-entry attempt. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The next action is too large, public, risky, or ambiguous for a first re-entry attempt."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Self-handicapping may create a small private obstacle and does not entail an oversized reentry action.", "slug": "self_handicapping"}], "normalized_requirement": "The next action is too large, public, risky, or ambiguous for a first reentry attempt.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The next action is too large, public, risky, or ambiguous for a first reentry attempt.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 32, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-032", "ledger_sha256": "6023271b834e118e764634c13e127bda6ccc326dbb7e7c996ed3bfa39842c2b9"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Hermeneutic Iteration", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:hermeneutic_iteration", "slug": "hermeneutic_iteration"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 4, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 4 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 1 of 4 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a two-sided distortion. On one side, local parts are misread as if they carried complete meaning by themselves. On the other side, whole accounts become speculative frames that absorb details without being changed by them.\n\nThis produces quote absolutism, cherry-picked synthesis, interpretive overconfidence, and false convergence. A group may feel that an interpretation is coherent because it tells a satisfying story, not because the parts and whole have actually constrained one another.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A part is misread without the whole, while the whole remains speculative because it is not repeatedly tested against the parts. Interpretation either fragments into isolated observations or hardens into an explanatory frame that absorbs evidence without revision."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Recursive mutual conditioning of part and whole meanings is the exact structural primitive.", "role_mapping": "Context-dependent meaning -> whole grounds part while parts revise whole.", "slug": "hermeneutic_circle", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b032_a03_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: context-dependent meaning. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["context-dependent meaning"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Hermeneutic Circle", "one_liner": "Whole/part interpretation loop.", "page_ref": "prime:hermeneutic_circle", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Context-dependent meaning -> whole grounds part while parts revise whole.", "slug": "hermeneutic_circle", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Recursive mutual conditioning of part and whole meanings is the exact structural primitive."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Meaning depends on the relation between a part and its larger context.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P058-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must include an interpreter, a proposed whole, and evidential parts.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An interpreter constructs a whole-account interpretation from or about constituent parts.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail closure or certainty rather than a tentative hypothesis.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The interpreter treats the whole-account interpretation as settled or certain.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve premature timing relative to part-to-whole testing.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Closure occurs before sufficient iterative testing of the whole against the parts.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail premature or overstrong certainty, not merely early interpretation.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The achieved certainty exceeds what the tested evidence warrants.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "An interpreter reaches certainty about a whole account before testing it sufficiently against the account's parts.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An interpreter closes on a whole-account interpretation prematurely relative to part-to-whole testing.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P058-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A productive hermeneutic circle explicitly revises pre-understanding and need not involve premature certainty.", "slug": "hermeneutic_circle"}], "residual_id": "r:hermeneutic_iteration:b032_a03_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b032_a03_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: premature whole-account certainty. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["premature whole-account certainty"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A productive hermeneutic circle explicitly revises pre-understanding and need not involve premature certainty.", "slug": "hermeneutic_circle"}], "normalized_requirement": "An interpreter reaches premature certainty about the whole account.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "An interpreter reaches premature certainty about the whole account.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P058-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must include plural interpretive parts capable of being related.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An interpretation contains multiple details, observations, or parts.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail lack of integration among the interpretive details.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The parts remain fragmented or isolated from one another.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve absence of whole-level synthesis.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The fragmented parts are not synthesized into a coherent whole account.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Interpretive details remain fragmented without synthesis into a whole.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Interpretive parts remain isolated rather than being synthesized into a coherent whole.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P058-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Interpretation can synthesize details coherently and does not entail fragmentation.", "slug": "interpretation"}], "residual_id": "r:hermeneutic_iteration:b032_a03_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b032_a03_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: fragmented details without synthesis. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["fragmented details without synthesis"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Interpretation can synthesize details coherently and does not entail fragmentation.", "slug": "interpretation"}], "normalized_requirement": "Interpretive details remain fragmented without synthesis into a whole.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Interpretive details remain fragmented without synthesis into a whole.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Part-whole iteration can converge within one interpreter or across horizons without disagreement.", "slug": "hermeneutic_circle"}], "residual_id": "r:hermeneutic_iteration:b032_a03_c4", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b032_a03_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: interpretive disagreement. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["interpretive disagreement"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Part-whole iteration can converge within one interpreter or across horizons without disagreement.", "slug": "hermeneutic_circle"}], "normalized_requirement": "Interpreters disagree about meaning.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Interpreters disagree about meaning.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "DISJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "action under unavoidable ambiguity.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: action under unavoidable ambiguity. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["action under unavoidable ambiguity"]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "action under unavoidable ambiguity"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 32, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-032", "ledger_sha256": "6023271b834e118e764634c13e127bda6ccc326dbb7e7c996ed3bfa39842c2b9"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Heterogeneous Medium Propagation Routing", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:heterogeneous_medium_propagation_routing", "slug": "heterogeneous_medium_propagation_routing"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 5, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 6 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system expects an effect to propagate evenly, predictably, or only along intended channels, but the underlying medium is heterogeneous. Differences in permeability, resistance, connectivity, density, trust, susceptibility, impedance, capacity, or boundary conditions create preferential corridors, slow regions, dead zones, leakage paths, and amplification pockets. Without mapping those differences, actors overestimate reach, underestimate risk, misplace sensors or interventions, and misunderstand why propagation succeeds in one region while failing or exploding in another.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system expects an effect to propagate evenly, predictably, or only along intended channels, but the underlying medium is heterogeneous. Differences in permeability, resistance, connectivity, density, trust, susceptibility, impedance, capacity, or boundary conditions create preferential corridors, slow regions, dead zones, leakage paths, and amplification pockets. Without mapping those differences, actors overestimate reach, underestimate risk, misplace sensors or interventions, and misunderstand why propagation succeeds in one region while failing or exploding in another."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact pattern sends one heterogeneous bundle through a common carrier while components drop out at different distances, creating uneven downstream reach.", "role_mapping": "Same source -> input bundle; uneven spread -> differential continued passage.", "slug": "selective_propagation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b032_a04_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The same source produces uneven spread across regions, communities, materials, network segments, or organizational units. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The same source produces uneven spread across regions, communities, materials, network segments, or organizational units."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Selective Propagation", "one_liner": "A heterogeneous population moves through one carrier or medium while a component property controls continued passage or dropout, so the population that reaches farther is systematically composition-shifted even when the survivors move at the same speed.", "page_ref": "prime:selective_propagation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Same source -> input bundle; uneven spread -> differential continued passage.", "slug": "selective_propagation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact pattern sends one heterogeneous bundle through a common carrier while components drop out at different distances, creating uneven downstream reach."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The same source spreads unevenly across regions, communities, materials, network segments, or units.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P058-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must include one propagation process and multiple spatial, network, or social regions.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An effect, signal, resource, practice, or disturbance propagates through a field containing multiple regions.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the source's too-much intensity rather than mere receipt.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "At least one region receives the propagated effect above its intended or acceptable level.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve two different region groups within one propagation condition.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "At least one distinct other region is on the low-reach side of the same propagation episode.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires inability of the effect to reach the other region.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The other region is unreachable by the propagation process.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires no resulting effect in the other region.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The other region remains unaffected by the propagation process.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve simultaneity rather than compare unrelated times or deployments.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "Overexposure and low reach occur within the same propagation condition or episode.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "In one propagation field, some regions receive too much while distinct regions remain unreachable or unaffected.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "One propagation episode simultaneously overexposes some regions and fails to reach or affect others.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P058-C08-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Differential survival can shift composition while all regions receive some signal at acceptable intensity.", "slug": "selective_propagation"}], "residual_id": "r:heterogeneous_medium_propagation_routing:b032_a04_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b032_a04_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Some regions receive the signal, resource, practice, or disturbance too strongly while others remain unreachable or unaffected. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Some regions receive the signal, resource, practice, or disturbance too strongly while others remain unreachable or unaffected."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Differential survival can shift composition while all regions receive some signal at acceptable intensity.", "slug": "selective_propagation"}], "normalized_requirement": "Some regions receive too much while others remain unreachable or unaffected.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Some regions receive too much while others remain unreachable or unaffected.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Selective propagation may be caused by heterogeneous moving components in a uniform carrier.", "slug": "selective_propagation"}], "residual_id": "r:heterogeneous_medium_propagation_routing:b032_a04_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b032_a04_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The substrate has varying properties such as conductivity, permeability, density, topology, tie strength, trust, attention, capacity, insulation, or susceptibility. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The substrate has varying properties such as conductivity, permeability, density, topology, tie strength, trust, attention, capacity, insulation, or susceptibility."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Selective propagation may be caused by heterogeneous moving components in a uniform carrier.", "slug": "selective_propagation"}], "normalized_requirement": "The substrate varies in conductivity, permeability, density, topology, trust, attention, capacity, or susceptibility.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The substrate varies in conductivity, permeability, density, topology, trust, attention, capacity, or susceptibility.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P058-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must include propagation through a physical, social, informational, or network medium.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An effect propagates through a medium.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must include a locus at which distinct medium types meet.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "At least two medium types meet at a boundary, interface, or transition.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must connect the propagation path to the boundary, interface, or transition rather than merely note heterogeneity elsewhere.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The propagating effect encounters or crosses the inter-medium locus.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the direction from the medium-type encounter to changed propagation.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Encountering the inter-medium locus changes the effect's propagation behavior.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "A boundary, interface, or transition between medium types changes propagation behavior.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Encountering a boundary between medium types changes how an effect propagates.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P058-C09-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P058-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must include propagation through a physical, social, informational, or network medium containing differentiated regions.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An effect propagates through a heterogeneous medium.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must include a genuine medium layer, not merely an abstract boundary with no interior.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The medium contains a distinct layer characterized by a medium type or property regime different from adjacent regions.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must connect the propagation path to travel through the layer itself rather than only crossing an interface.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The effect propagates within or through the interior of the distinct layer.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the direction from the layer's properties to altered propagation.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The layer's medium properties change the effect's propagation behavior.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Propagation through a distinct medium layer changes behavior because of that layer's properties.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A distinct medium layer changes an effect's propagation through its interior properties.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P058-C09-U2"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Propagation can occur in a homogeneous medium with no interface between types.", "slug": "propagation"}], "residual_id": "r:heterogeneous_medium_propagation_routing:b032_a04_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b032_a04_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Boundaries, interfaces, layers, or transitions between medium types change propagation behavior. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Boundaries, interfaces, layers, or transitions between medium types change propagation behavior."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 2, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 2}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Propagation can occur in a homogeneous medium with no interface between types.", "slug": "propagation"}], "normalized_requirement": "Interfaces or transitions between medium types change propagation behavior.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 2 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Interfaces or transitions between medium types change propagation behavior.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P058-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must include comparable route alternatives for the same effect or endpoint.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "One propagation objective has both a direct route and an indirect route through a medium.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the direct-versus-indirect comparison before medium effects.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Abstract geometry or topology ranks one route as more direct than the other.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must connect direct-route failure to medium resistance.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The direct route fails because the medium resists it.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must connect indirect-route success to medium support.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The indirect route succeeds because the medium supports it.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail direct failure together with indirect success, not merely different costs.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Realized route performance reverses the expectation based on abstract directness.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "A route that is direct in abstract space fails because the medium resists it, while an indirect route succeeds because the medium supports it.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Medium resistance and support reverse the success ranking of abstractly direct and indirect propagation routes.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P058-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A path can be direct and effective without any medium-dependent route reversal.", "slug": "path"}], "residual_id": "r:heterogeneous_medium_propagation_routing:b032_a04_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b032_a04_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A route that looks direct in abstract space fails because the medium resists it, while an indirect path works because the medium supports it. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A route that looks direct in abstract space fails because the medium resists it, while an indirect path works because the medium supports it."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A path can be direct and effective without any medium-dependent route reversal.", "slug": "path"}], "normalized_requirement": "A direct abstract route fails while an indirect route succeeds because of medium resistance and support.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A direct abstract route fails while an indirect route succeeds because of medium resistance and support.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P058-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must include reuse of the same propagation method across contexts.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A propagation method is transferred or scaled from a prior context into a new context.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail failure rather than merely changed performance.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The propagation method fails in the new context.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the direction from cross-context use to failure.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Scaling or transfer into the new context causes the failure.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve surprise or violated transfer expectation.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The failure is unexpected under the prior model or experience of the method.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires transfer into a new terrain.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The new context is a terrain.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires transfer into a new cultural medium.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The new context is a culture.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires transfer into a new material medium.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The new context is a material.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires transfer into a new network.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The new context is a network.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Scaling the same propagation method into a new terrain, culture, material, or network causes unexpected failure.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Cross-context scaling of a propagation method causes unexpected failure in the new medium.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P058-C12-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P058-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must include reuse of the same propagation method across contexts.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A propagation method is transferred or scaled from a prior context into a new context.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail runaway behavior rather than ordinary success.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Propagation in the new context amplifies, accelerates, or spreads beyond controlled or expected bounds.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the direction from cross-context use to runaway propagation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Scaling or transfer into the new context causes the runaway behavior.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve surprise or violated transfer expectation.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The runaway behavior is unexpected under the prior model or experience of the method.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires transfer into a new terrain.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The new context is a terrain.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires transfer into a new cultural medium.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The new context is a culture.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires transfer into a new material medium.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The new context is a material.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires transfer into a new network.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The new context is a network.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Scaling the same propagation method into a new terrain, culture, material, or network causes unexpected runaway behavior.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Cross-context scaling of a propagation method causes unexpected runaway propagation in the new medium.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P058-C12-U2"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Selective propagation can remain stable within one medium and need not involve cross-context scaling.", "slug": "selective_propagation"}], "residual_id": "r:heterogeneous_medium_propagation_routing:b032_a04_c8", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b032_a04_c8", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Scaling the same propagation method into a new terrain, culture, material, or network causes unexpected failure or runaway behavior. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Scaling the same propagation method into a new terrain, culture, material, or network causes unexpected failure or runaway behavior."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 2, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 2}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Selective propagation can remain stable within one medium and need not involve cross-context scaling.", "slug": "selective_propagation"}], "normalized_requirement": "Scaling one propagation method into a new terrain, culture, material, or network causes unexpected failure or runaway behavior.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 2 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Scaling one propagation method into a new terrain, culture, material, or network causes unexpected failure or runaway behavior.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [8], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A design depends on coverage, reach, containment, drainage, heat dissipation, infection control, adoption spread, or communication penetration.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: A design depends on coverage, reach, containment, drainage, heat dissipation, infection control, adoption spread, or communication penetration. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A design depends on coverage, reach, containment, drainage, heat dissipation, infection control, adoption spread, or communication penetration."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "A design depends on coverage, reach, containment, drainage, heat dissipation, infection control, adoption spread, or communication penetration."}, {"display_text": "Sensors, probes, or monitoring points show unexplained holes, hotspots, reflections, delays, shortcuts, or cascading spread.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Sensors, probes, or monitoring points show unexplained holes, hotspots, reflections, delays, shortcuts, or cascading spread. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Sensors, probes, or monitoring points show unexplained holes, hotspots, reflections, delays, shortcuts, or cascading spread."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "Sensors, probes, or monitoring points show unexplained holes, hotspots, reflections, delays, shortcuts, or cascading spread."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 32, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-032", "ledger_sha256": "6023271b834e118e764634c13e127bda6ccc326dbb7e7c996ed3bfa39842c2b9"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Heuristic Calibration and Confidence Judgment", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:heuristic_calibration_and_confidence_judgment", "slug": "heuristic_calibration_and_confidence_judgment"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 5, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 6 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is not merely that a heuristic exists. The problem is that confidence in the heuristic is uncalibrated: it may be inflated by familiarity, authority, fluency, selective memory, or past success in a different environment. It may also be too low when a heuristic has a strong track record but lacks a trusted confidence format. Without calibration, the system cannot distinguish fast-path cases from cases needing review.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A person, team, model-assisted workflow, or organization relies on a heuristic but treats its output with either too much confidence, too little confidence, or context-insensitive confidence. Because the heuristic is fast, familiar, status-backed, or historically useful, its confidence may be accepted without checking whether the present environment is learnable, similar to prior cases, feedback-rich, stable, or high stakes. The result is overconfident error, needless underuse of useful expertise, or unprincipled escalation."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A heuristic is defined for a task class but an instance can be used only once.", "slug": "heuristic"}], "residual_id": "r:heuristic_calibration_and_confidence_judgment:b032_a05_c1", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b032_a05_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A rule of thumb, expert intuition, triage cue, or screening rule is used repeatedly under uncertainty. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A rule of thumb, expert intuition, triage cue, or screening rule is used repeatedly under uncertainty."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A heuristic is defined for a task class but an instance can be used only once.", "slug": "heuristic"}], "normalized_requirement": "A heuristic, intuition, triage cue, or screening rule is used repeatedly under uncertainty.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A heuristic, intuition, triage cue, or screening rule is used repeatedly under uncertainty.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P058-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must include an evaluator and an object of judgment.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "One or more judges or evaluators make a judgment about an outcome, state, risk, or action.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a confidence claim rather than an unqualified conclusion.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The judges attach an expressed confidence level to the judgment.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail absence of common empirical evidence linking confidence levels to realized accuracy or outcomes.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "No shared calibration evidence supports the expressed confidence level.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Judges make confidence claims without shared calibration evidence.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Evaluators express confidence in judgments without evidence shared across users that calibrates those confidence levels.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P058-C13-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A confidence annotation can be evidence-backed and calibrated.", "slug": "confidence_annotation"}], "residual_id": "r:heuristic_calibration_and_confidence_judgment:b032_a05_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b032_a05_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Judges make confidence claims such as “very likely,” “safe,” “high risk,” or “probably fine” without shared calibration evidence. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Judges make confidence claims such as “very likely,” “safe,” “high risk,” or “probably fine” without shared calibration evidence."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A confidence annotation can be evidence-backed and calibrated.", "slug": "confidence_annotation"}], "normalized_requirement": "Judges make confidence claims without shared calibration evidence.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Judges make confidence claims without shared calibration evidence.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact dynamic fixes a once-successful rule while the current generating distribution moves away from its calibration regime.", "role_mapping": "Historical success -> calibration distribution; current difference -> moving-world gap.", "slug": "calibrated_rule_vs_moving_world", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b032_a05_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Historical successes are cited even though current cases differ in population, incentives, data quality, or regime. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Historical successes are cited even though current cases differ in population, incentives, data quality, or regime."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Calibrated Rule versus Moving World", "one_liner": "A rule, model, or policy fitted to a past distribution of the world degrades as the world it was calibrated on drifts away from that distribution.", "page_ref": "prime:calibrated_rule_vs_moving_world", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Historical success -> calibration distribution; current difference -> moving-world gap.", "slug": "calibrated_rule_vs_moving_world", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact dynamic fixes a once-successful rule while the current generating distribution moves away from its calibration regime."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Historical successes are cited although current cases differ in population, incentives, data quality, or regime.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P058-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must include a confidence-bearing judgment made before realization.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A prior prediction or judgment carries an expressed confidence level.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail that realized results are available for evaluation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The actual outcome or result is observable.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve prior-confidence versus later-outcome order.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The observable result occurs after the confidence-bearing judgment.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail absence of the calibration comparison despite outcome observability.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "No one compares the prior confidence level with the realized result.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Outcomes are observable, but prior confidence is not compared with the realized results.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "No one compares prior confidence judgments with the observable outcomes that later realize.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P058-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Calibration is the positive comparison-and-adjustment process and does not entail its absence.", "slug": "calibration"}], "residual_id": "r:heuristic_calibration_and_confidence_judgment:b032_a05_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b032_a05_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Outcomes are observable but no one compares prior confidence with actual results. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Outcomes are observable but no one compares prior confidence with actual results."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Calibration is the positive comparison-and-adjustment process and does not entail its absence.", "slug": "calibration"}], "normalized_requirement": "Outcomes are observable but prior confidence is not compared with realized results.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Outcomes are observable but prior confidence is not compared with realized results.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A drifting calibrated rule can decay gradually with anticipated errors and need not be a heuristic.", "slug": "calibrated_rule_vs_moving_world"}], "residual_id": "r:heuristic_calibration_and_confidence_judgment:b032_a05_c5", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b032_a05_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: High-confidence heuristic calls sometimes fail in ways that surprise users or affected parties. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["High-confidence heuristic calls sometimes fail in ways that surprise users or affected parties."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A drifting calibrated rule can decay gradually with anticipated errors and need not be a heuristic.", "slug": "calibrated_rule_vs_moving_world"}], "normalized_requirement": "High-confidence heuristic calls sometimes fail in surprising ways.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "High-confidence heuristic calls sometimes fail in surprising ways.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P058-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve that the heuristic is useful rather than worthless.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A heuristic has demonstrated or recognized usefulness for a task.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must include people whose reliance or trust matters.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "People are potential users or recipients of the heuristic's output.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail distrust rather than merely incomplete understanding.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The people distrust or decline reliance on the useful heuristic.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require absent or noncredible communication of confidence.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The heuristic's confidence is not communicated credibly to those people.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the direction from communication failure to loss of trust.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The confidence-communication failure causes the distrust.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "People distrust a useful heuristic because its confidence is not communicated credibly.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A useful heuristic loses user trust because its confidence is not communicated credibly.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P058-C15-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P058-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve that the heuristic is useful rather than worthless.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A heuristic has demonstrated or recognized usefulness for a task.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must include people whose reliance or trust matters.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "People are potential users or recipients of the heuristic's output.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail distrust rather than merely cautious use.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The people distrust or decline reliance on the useful heuristic.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require absent or noncredible limits on where confidence applies.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The heuristic's confidence, uncertainty, or failure regime is not bounded credibly.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the direction from unbounded confidence to loss of trust.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The missing credible confidence bounds cause the distrust.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "People distrust a useful heuristic because its confidence is not bounded credibly.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A useful heuristic loses user trust because its confidence and failure limits are not bounded credibly.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P058-C15-U2"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A heuristic can be trusted and communicate its failure regime clearly.", "slug": "heuristic"}], "residual_id": "r:heuristic_calibration_and_confidence_judgment:b032_a05_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b032_a05_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: People distrust a useful heuristic because its confidence is not communicated or bounded credibly. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["People distrust a useful heuristic because its confidence is not communicated or bounded credibly."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 2, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 2}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A heuristic can be trusted and communicate its failure regime clearly.", "slug": "heuristic"}], "normalized_requirement": "People distrust a useful heuristic because its confidence is not bounded or communicated credibly.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 2 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "People distrust a useful heuristic because its confidence is not bounded or communicated credibly.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A fast decision path needs rules for when to proceed, pause, escalate, or gather more evidence.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Without calibration, the system cannot distinguish fast-path cases from cases needing review. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: A fast decision path needs rules for when to proceed, pause, escalate, or gather more evidence. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A fast decision path needs rules for when to proceed, pause, escalate, or gather more evidence.", "Without calibration, the system cannot distinguish fast-path cases from cases needing review."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "A fast decision path needs rules for when to proceed, pause, escalate, or gather more evidence."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 32, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-032", "ledger_sha256": "6023271b834e118e764634c13e127bda6ccc326dbb7e7c996ed3bfa39842c2b9"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Heuristic Rule Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:heuristic_rule_design", "slug": "heuristic_rule_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 3 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem has two coupled failures. First, full analysis consumes more time, information, computation, or attention than the setting can supply. Second, people still must act, so they substitute private shortcuts that are inconsistent, unvalidated, difficult to audit, and vulnerable to salient but unreliable cues. More analysis is not always feasible, while unmanaged simplification is not safe.\n\nComplexity also creates a coordination problem. Different actors may use different implicit thresholds, stop searching at different times, or assign opposite meanings to the same cue. Outcomes then depend on who happens to decide rather than on a governed policy. Because the shortcut remains tacit, errors are attributed to individuals and cannot accumulate into institutional learning.\n\nDistribution shift is the deeper temporal risk. A rule can be locally effective because it exploits stable regularities, then fail after incentives, populations, technologies, or measurement practices change. The archetype therefore treats reference environment and applicability boundary as part of the rule, not as documentation added later.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A recurring decision must be made under limits that make full analysis infeasible, while unmanaged private shortcuts produce inconsistent and unauditable outcomes."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "This branch preserves the complete remedy-free diagnostic route; goals, feasibility clauses, gates, deployment constraints, and supporting context remain outside the DNF."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Bounded rationality requires real limits on time, information, computation, or attention that make exhaustive evaluation infeasible relative to the decision setting.", "role_mapping": "The bounded agent maps to the decision maker; the non-trivial choice set maps to the full analysis that exceeds available resources.", "slug": "bounded_rationality", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "ext001_heuristic_rule_design_a01", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored structural_problem, prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: Full analysis requires more time, information, computation, or attention than the recurring decision setting can supply.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Full analysis requires more time, information, computation, or attention than the recurring decision setting can supply."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Bounded Rationality", "one_liner": "Limited decision capacity.", "page_ref": "prime:bounded_rationality", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "The bounded agent maps to the decision maker; the non-trivial choice set maps to the full analysis that exceeds available resources.", "slug": "bounded_rationality", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Bounded rationality requires real limits on time, information, computation, or attention that make exhaustive evaluation infeasible relative to the decision setting."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Full analysis requires more time, information, computation, or attention than the recurring decision setting can supply.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "EXT001-C054", "dnf": [["EXT001-U054-O1"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"obligation_id": "EXT001-U054-O1", "predicate": "A decision must still be made before full analysis can complete."}], "predicate": "A decision must still be made before full analysis can complete.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A decision must still be made before full analysis can complete.", "unit_id": "EXT001-U054"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"catalog_exhaustion": "CONDITION_LEVEL", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: A decision must still be made before full analysis can complete.", "slug": "legitimacy_yielding_inquiry"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: A decision must still be made before full analysis can complete.", "slug": "value_of_information"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: A decision must still be made before full analysis can complete.", "slug": "escalation_of_commitment"}], "residual_id": "EXT001:heuristic_rule_design:C02", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding."}}, "condition_id": "ext001_heuristic_rule_design_a02", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored structural_problem, prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: A decision must still be made before full analysis can complete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A decision must still be made before full analysis can complete."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: A decision must still be made before full analysis can complete.", "slug": "legitimacy_yielding_inquiry"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: A decision must still be made before full analysis can complete.", "slug": "value_of_information"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: A decision must still be made before full analysis can complete.", "slug": "escalation_of_commitment"}], "normalized_requirement": "A decision must still be made before full analysis can complete.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A decision must still be made before full analysis can complete.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "EXT001-C055", "dnf": [["EXT001-U055-O1"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"obligation_id": "EXT001-U055-O1", "predicate": "Decision makers use inconsistent, tacit, or unvalidated shortcuts in the absence of a governed rule."}], "predicate": "Decision makers use inconsistent, tacit, or unvalidated shortcuts in the absence of a governed rule.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Decision makers use inconsistent, tacit, or unvalidated shortcuts in the absence of a governed rule.", "unit_id": "EXT001-U055"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"catalog_exhaustion": "CONDITION_LEVEL", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Decision makers use inconsistent, tacit, or unvalidated shortcuts in the absence of a governed rule.", "slug": "decision"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Decision makers use inconsistent, tacit, or unvalidated shortcuts in the absence of a governed rule.", "slug": "mandatory_vs_default_norms"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Decision makers use inconsistent, tacit, or unvalidated shortcuts in the absence of a governed rule.", "slug": "incomplete_contract"}], "residual_id": "EXT001:heuristic_rule_design:C03", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding."}}, "condition_id": "ext001_heuristic_rule_design_a03", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored structural_problem, prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: Decision makers use inconsistent, tacit, or unvalidated shortcuts in the absence of a governed rule.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Decision makers use inconsistent, tacit, or unvalidated shortcuts in the absence of a governed rule."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Decision makers use inconsistent, tacit, or unvalidated shortcuts in the absence of a governed rule.", "slug": "decision"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Decision makers use inconsistent, tacit, or unvalidated shortcuts in the absence of a governed rule.", "slug": "mandatory_vs_default_norms"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Decision makers use inconsistent, tacit, or unvalidated shortcuts in the absence of a governed rule.", "slug": "incomplete_contract"}], "normalized_requirement": "Decision makers use inconsistent, tacit, or unvalidated shortcuts in the absence of a governed rule.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Decision makers use inconsistent, tacit, or unvalidated shortcuts in the absence of a governed rule.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A small observable cue set can support a bounded good-enough decision rule.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored structural_problem, prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: A small observable cue set can support a bounded good-enough decision rule. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A small observable cue set can support a bounded good-enough decision rule.", "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored structural_problem, prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "A small observable cue set can support a bounded good-enough decision rule."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"candidate_ledger_sha256": "96f72d2139077fd57bf795048ebef33b3fd574b20963170080ec916b5b3b92fe", "extension_id": "new-archetypes-extension-001", "ledger_id": "prime-production-v1.2-extension-001", "ledger_sha256": "9644520614744632d1d36da44b1acd77ce432852c6083eb871203521c166efce"}, "base_projection_sha256": "841e0c7f3cb8e8054475ad29a8a14745a416b4fc115559a44878b94292e673ec", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "ca09ed9fe1598ce7072755b530de5553f5ee0a7cd64ae82d9e4a4e2149a37788", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Heuristic vs. Algorithm Tradeoff and Selection", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:heuristic_vs_algorithm_tradeoff_and_selection", "slug": "heuristic_vs_algorithm_tradeoff_and_selection"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 1, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 5 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is method mismatch. A shortcut can become a hidden bias when it escapes the domain where it was learned. A formal model can become false precision when data are poor or assumptions are unstable. A full optimization process can waste scarce time on low-stakes routine choices. A simple rule can miss rare but severe cases.\n\nThe system needs a way to choose the method before it chooses the answer. Without that layer, method selection happens by habit, status, tooling availability, or local preference.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Decision-makers often default to either intuition and rule-of-thumb shortcuts or formal algorithmic analysis without testing which method fits the context. The resulting mismatch creates preventable errors: slow overanalysis of routine choices, brittle shortcut use in high-stakes cases, opaque automation where contestability is needed, or inconsistent human judgment where repeatability matters."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact method gains speed and cognitive economy by accepting an environment-dependent accuracy tradeoff.", "role_mapping": "Decision cost -> cognitive economy; error cost -> speed-accuracy tradeoff.", "slug": "heuristic", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b032_a06_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The cost of delay, computation, data collection, or deliberation competes with the cost of being wrong. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The cost of delay, computation, data collection, or deliberation competes with the cost of being wrong."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Heuristic", "one_liner": "Mental shortcuts.", "page_ref": "prime:heuristic", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Decision cost -> cognitive economy; error cost -> speed-accuracy tradeoff.", "slug": "heuristic", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact method gains speed and cognitive economy by accepting an environment-dependent accuracy tradeoff."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Delay, computation, data, or deliberation cost competes with the cost of error.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P059-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must explicitly cover false positives as one error class.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The setting contains false-positive outcomes.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must explicitly cover false negatives as one error class.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The setting contains false-negative outcomes.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must explicitly cover missed opportunities as one error class.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The setting contains missed-opportunity outcomes.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must explicitly cover delays or delayed action as one error class.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The setting contains delayed-action outcomes.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require material consequence asymmetry across the named error classes, not merely note that errors occur.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The consequences of the four error classes differ materially.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "False positives, false negatives, missed opportunities, and delayed actions have materially different consequences.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "The consequence costs of four decision-error classes are materially asymmetric.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P059-C01-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An asymmetric screen deliberately chooses one-sided error but does not require all listed error costs to differ.", "slug": "asymmetric_screening"}], "residual_id": "r:heuristic_vs_algorithm_tradeoff_and_selection:b032_a06_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b032_a06_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Errors are asymmetric: a false positive, false negative, missed opportunity, or delayed action has materially different consequences. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Errors are asymmetric: a false positive, false negative, missed opportunity, or delayed action has materially different consequences."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An asymmetric screen deliberately chooses one-sided error but does not require all listed error costs to differ.", "slug": "asymmetric_screening"}], "normalized_requirement": "False positives, false negatives, missed opportunities, and delays have materially different consequences.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "False positives, false negatives, missed opportunities, and delays have materially different consequences.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P059-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"], ["O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must identify a heuristic and the domain whose regularities supplied its learning.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A heuristic has a domain in which it was learned.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must require actual heuristic use beyond the domain in which it was learned.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The heuristic is actually used in an application domain outside its learning domain.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must identify a heuristic and the domain over which its performance was validated.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A heuristic has a domain in which it was validated.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must require actual heuristic use beyond the domain in which it was validated.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The heuristic is actually used in an application domain outside its validation domain.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "A heuristic is used outside the domain where it was learned or validated.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A heuristic is transferred beyond its learning or validation domain.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P059-C02-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A heuristic can be used strictly inside the environment whose regularities support it.", "slug": "heuristic"}], "residual_id": "r:heuristic_vs_algorithm_tradeoff_and_selection:b032_a06_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b032_a06_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A heuristic is being used outside the domain where it was learned or validated. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A heuristic is being used outside the domain where it was learned or validated."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A heuristic can be used strictly inside the environment whose regularities support it.", "slug": "heuristic"}], "normalized_requirement": "A heuristic is used outside the domain where it was learned or validated.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A heuristic is used outside the domain where it was learned or validated.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P059-C03", "dnf": [], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [], "predicate": "An available algorithm or model may be too opaque, slow, data-hungry, brittle, or socially contested for the use case.", "resolution": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RESIDUAL", "semantic_scope": "NON_ABSTRACTION", "structural_head": "An available algorithm may be operationally unsuitable for a particular use case.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P059-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A heuristic can be used where no competing algorithm exists.", "slug": "heuristic"}], "residual_id": "r:heuristic_vs_algorithm_tradeoff_and_selection:b032_a06_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b032_a06_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: An algorithm or model is available but may be too opaque, slow, data-hungry, brittle, or socially contested for the use case. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["An algorithm or model is available but may be too opaque, slow, data-hungry, brittle, or socially contested for the use case."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RECLASSIFIED", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 1, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A heuristic can be used where no competing algorithm exists.", "slug": "heuristic"}], "normalized_requirement": "An available algorithm is too opaque, slow, data-hungry, brittle, or contested for the use case.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RECLASSIFIED", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later candidate-blind atomization classified this remainder as a threshold, parameter, materiality test, or other non-abstraction rather than a catalog gap."}, "predicate": "An available algorithm is too opaque, slow, data-hungry, brittle, or contested for the use case.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P059-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must distinguish both routine and exceptional case classes.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Routine cases and exceptional cases occur in the same decision setting.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require the routine and exceptional cases to be handled without adequate separation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The two case classes are mixed rather than separated.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must make the mixed treatment causally responsible for the escalation failure.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The mixing causes an escalation error.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This complete branch must entail actual escalation below the warranted level.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The resulting error is under-escalation.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This complete branch must entail actual escalation above the warranted level.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The resulting error is over-escalation.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Mixing routine and exceptional cases causes under-escalation or over-escalation.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Failure to separate routine from exceptional cases causes escalation errors.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P059-C04-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A heuristic can operate over a homogeneous case class with correctly handled exceptions.", "slug": "heuristic"}], "residual_id": "r:heuristic_vs_algorithm_tradeoff_and_selection:b032_a06_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b032_a06_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Routine cases and exceptional cases are mixed together, causing either under-escalation or over-escalation. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Routine cases and exceptional cases are mixed together, causing either under-escalation or over-escalation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A heuristic can operate over a homogeneous case class with correctly handled exceptions.", "slug": "heuristic"}], "normalized_requirement": "Routine and exceptional cases are mixed, producing under- or over-escalation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Routine and exceptional cases are mixed, producing under- or over-escalation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A decision recurs often enough that method choice can be standardized or improved.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Decision-makers often default to either intuition and rule-of-thumb shortcuts or formal algorithmic analysis without testing which method fits the context. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: A decision recurs often enough that method choice can be standardized or improved. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A decision recurs often enough that method choice can be standardized or improved.", "Decision-makers often default to either intuition and rule-of-thumb shortcuts or formal algorithmic analysis without testing which method fits the context."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "A decision recurs often enough that method choice can be standardized or improved."}, {"display_text": "Stakeholders need to understand why one decision path is automated, another is manually reviewed, and another is handled by a simple rule.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It also applies when stakeholders need to understand why some decisions are automated, some use human judgment, some require expert review, and some move through a hybrid path. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: Stakeholders need to understand why one decision path is automated, another is manually reviewed, and another is handled by a simple rule. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders need to understand why one decision path is automated, another is manually reviewed, and another is handled by a simple rule.", "It also applies when stakeholders need to understand why some decisions are automated, some use human judgment, some require expert review, and some move through a hybrid path."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "Stakeholders need to understand why one decision path is automated, another is manually reviewed, and another is handled by a simple rule."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 32, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-032", "ledger_sha256": "6023271b834e118e764634c13e127bda6ccc326dbb7e7c996ed3bfa39842c2b9"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Hidden Path Discovery", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:hidden_path_discovery", "slug": "hidden_path_discovery"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is route-goal confusion. Actors treat the obvious route as if it were the goal itself. When that route is blocked, they conclude that the goal is impossible.\n\nHidden Path Discovery looks for cases where the blockage is specific to a path, representation, sequence, or institutional frame rather than to the underlying objective. The system may need a different topology, bridge actor, adapter, procedural pathway, negotiation sequence, analogy, or constraint relaxation test to reveal feasibility.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A goal appears blocked because the obvious route is impossible, forbidden, too costly, or too risky."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P059-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must identify the usual or ordinary route to the relevant outcome.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An ordinary route exists toward the relevant outcome.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require an obstruction that prevents use of the ordinary route.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "An obstruction blocks traversal of that route.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "The ordinary route is blocked.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An obstruction prevents use of the ordinary route.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P059-C05-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P059-C05", "dnf": [], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [], "predicate": "The ordinary route is unavailable.", "resolution": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RESIDUAL", "semantic_scope": "NON_ABSTRACTION", "structural_head": "The ordinary route cannot currently be accessed or used.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P059-C05-U2"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P059-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must identify the usual or ordinary route to the relevant outcome.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An ordinary route is the usual means toward the relevant outcome.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail that a governing constraint forbids use of the ordinary route.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A rule or authority prohibits use of that route.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "The ordinary route is prohibited.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A rule or authority forbids use of the ordinary route.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P059-C05-U3"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P059-C05", "dnf": [], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [], "predicate": "The ordinary route is too costly.", "resolution": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RESIDUAL", "semantic_scope": "NON_ABSTRACTION", "structural_head": "The ordinary route exceeds an acceptable cost threshold.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P059-C05-U4"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P059-C05", "dnf": [], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [], "predicate": "The ordinary route is too slow.", "resolution": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RESIDUAL", "semantic_scope": "NON_ABSTRACTION", "structural_head": "The ordinary route exceeds an acceptable duration threshold.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P059-C05-U5"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P059-C05", "dnf": [], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [], "predicate": "The ordinary route is too risky.", "resolution": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RESIDUAL", "semantic_scope": "NON_ABSTRACTION", "structural_head": "The ordinary route exceeds an acceptable risk threshold.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P059-C05-U6"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P059-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must identify a representation that determines which routes can be expressed or traversed.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A current representation structures the available route space.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must identify the ordinary route whose structural possibility is at issue.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "An ordinary route would otherwise be the usual means toward the outcome.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail representation-relative impossibility, not merely inconvenience or temporary blockage.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The current representation makes that ordinary route structurally impossible.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "The ordinary route is structurally impossible under the current representation.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "The current representation makes the ordinary route structurally impossible.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P059-C05-U7"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A desire path can form as a convenient shortcut even when the official route remains available and safe.", "slug": "desire_path"}], "residual_id": "r:hidden_path_discovery:b032_a07_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b032_a07_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The ordinary route is blocked, unavailable, prohibited, too costly, too slow, too risky, or structurally impossible under the current representation. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The ordinary route is blocked, unavailable, prohibited, too costly, too slow, too risky, or structurally impossible under the current representation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PARTIALLY_DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Without the guard, the gated exit may be exceptional; with it, the exact unsatisfiable token necessarily blocks the ordinary route to the goal.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Navigation loop", "one_liner": "Diagnose a workflow where a user cannot reach their goal by modeling the interface as a directed graph and asking one structural question — is any goal state reachable from the current state? — rather than blaming screen quality or user confusion.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:navigation_loop", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "gated_exit_is_ordinary_route", "predicate": "The hidden-token-gated exit is the ordinary route to the goal.", "rationale": "The one qualifier is candidate-anchored, atomic, non-restating, and sufficient for the retained complete DNF branch."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "navigation_loop"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "gated_exit_is_ordinary_route"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "navigation_loop", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P059-C05-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact transition-graph structure supplies a blocked exit to the goal, and one anchored role restriction identifies that existing exit as the ordinary route."}], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 3, "non_abstraction_units": 4, "resolved_units": 1, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 2}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A desire path can form as a convenient shortcut even when the official route remains available and safe.", "slug": "desire_path"}], "normalized_requirement": "The ordinary route is blocked, prohibited, too costly, risky, slow, or impossible under the current representation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "PARTIAL_EXISTING_DSA_GROUNDING", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation grounded 1 of 3 eligible atomic units; the remaining unit or units stayed open."}, "predicate": "The ordinary route is blocked, prohibited, too costly, risky, slow, or impossible under the current representation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A problem representation can encode genuine immutable physical constraints.", "slug": "problem_representation"}], "residual_id": "r:hidden_path_discovery:b032_a07_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b032_a07_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: At least some constraints are negotiable, representational, sequential, institutional, technical, or topological rather than absolute physical impossibilities. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["At least some constraints are negotiable, representational, sequential, institutional, technical, or topological rather than absolute physical impossibilities."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A problem representation can encode genuine immutable physical constraints.", "slug": "problem_representation"}], "normalized_requirement": "Some constraints are negotiable, representational, sequential, institutional, technical, or topological rather than physically absolute.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Some constraints are negotiable, representational, sequential, institutional, technical, or topological rather than physically absolute.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A path can be unique with no plausible adjacent alternative.", "slug": "path"}], "residual_id": "r:hidden_path_discovery:b032_a07_c6", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b032_a07_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: There are plausible adjacent possibilities, intermediaries, analogies, translation layers, alternate sequences, or procedural pathways worth searching. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["There are plausible adjacent possibilities, intermediaries, analogies, translation layers, alternate sequences, or procedural pathways worth searching."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A path can be unique with no plausible adjacent alternative.", "slug": "path"}], "normalized_requirement": "Plausible adjacent possibilities, intermediaries, analogies, translations, sequences, or procedures remain worth searching.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Plausible adjacent possibilities, intermediaries, analogies, translations, sequences, or procedures remain worth searching.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The desired outcome remains important enough that abandoning the goal or waiting passively is costly.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A goal appears blocked because the obvious route is impossible, forbidden, too costly, or too risky. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The desired outcome remains important enough that abandoning the goal or waiting passively is costly. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The desired outcome remains important enough that abandoning the goal or waiting passively is costly.", "A goal appears blocked because the obvious route is impossible, forbidden, too costly, or too risky."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "The desired outcome remains important enough that abandoning the goal or waiting passively is costly."}, {"display_text": "The system can run bounded probes or reviews without creating unacceptable harm if a candidate path fails.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: The system can run bounded probes or reviews without creating unacceptable harm if a candidate path fails. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The system can run bounded probes or reviews without creating unacceptable harm if a candidate path fails."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The system can run bounded probes or reviews without creating unacceptable harm if a candidate path fails."}, {"display_text": "Preserving the goal invariant matters more than preserving the familiar route.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The structural problem is route-goal confusion. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: Preserving the goal invariant matters more than preserving the familiar route. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Preserving the goal invariant matters more than preserving the familiar route.", "The structural problem is route-goal confusion."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Preserving the goal invariant matters more than preserving the familiar route."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 32, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-032", "ledger_sha256": "6023271b834e118e764634c13e127bda6ccc326dbb7e7c996ed3bfa39842c2b9"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Hidden Support Depletion Guarding", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:hidden_support_depletion_guarding", "slug": "hidden_support_depletion_guarding"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 3, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 1, "statement": "3 of 7 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 7}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system continues to operate, expand, or promise capacity while the hidden substrate that makes operation possible is being depleted. The visible surface provides reassuring continuity, but support thickness, slack, trust, maintenance capacity, workforce resilience, reserve liquidity, institutional legitimacy, or infrastructure condition is quietly falling below the level needed to carry ordinary load.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system continues to operate, expand, or promise capacity while the hidden substrate that makes operation possible is being depleted. The visible surface provides reassuring continuity, but support thickness, slack, trust, maintenance capacity, workforce resilience, reserve liquidity, institutional legitimacy, or infrastructure condition is quietly falling below the level needed to carry ordinary load."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A reserve is held aside but can be fully visible and coupled directly to demand.", "slug": "reserve"}], "residual_id": "r:hidden_support_depletion_guarding:b032_a08_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b032_a08_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A visible structure or operation depends on a less-visible support layer that can be depleted independently of visible demand. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A visible structure or operation depends on a less-visible support layer that can be depleted independently of visible demand."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A reserve is held aside but can be fully visible and coupled directly to demand.", "slug": "reserve"}], "normalized_requirement": "A visible structure depends on a less-visible support layer that depletes independently of visible demand.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A visible structure depends on a less-visible support layer that depletes independently of visible demand.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P059-C06", "dnf": [], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [], "predicate": "The support layer changes slowly.", "resolution": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RESIDUAL", "semantic_scope": "NON_ABSTRACTION", "structural_head": "Support-layer change occurs at a slow rate.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P059-C06-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P059-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must identify change in an underlying support layer, not only surface behavior.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An underlying support layer undergoes change.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must identify the ordinary observation channel against which invisibility is assessed.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "An ordinary monitoring or dashboard layer observes the system.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require that ordinary monitoring fails to expose the underlying change.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The support-layer change occurs outside that ordinary observation.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Changes in the support layer occur outside ordinary observation, including privately, underground, backstage, or in accounting categories that ordinary dashboards do not inspect.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Support-layer changes escape ordinary monitoring.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P059-C06-U2"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Information hiding may deliberately conceal stable implementation detail rather than a depleting support stock.", "slug": "information_hiding"}], "residual_id": "r:hidden_support_depletion_guarding:b032_a08_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b032_a08_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The support layer changes slowly, privately, underground, backstage, or in accounting categories that ordinary dashboards do not inspect. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The support layer changes slowly, privately, underground, backstage, or in accounting categories that ordinary dashboards do not inspect."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A control whose enacted protection changes visibly to ordinary assurance would not be a complete hazard-control-decay instance because the nominal-versus-actual blind gap would be absent.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Hazard-Control Decay", "one_liner": "Track the widening gap between what a safety control's paperwork says it does and what it actually does under hazard, so that a control certified sound by audit can be found silently unprotective before it fails.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:hazard_control_decay", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "hazard_control_decay"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "hazard_control_decay", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P059-C06-U2", "why_it_fits": "Every complete exact instance distinguishes changing enacted protection from nominal assurance and requires ordinary artifact monitoring to miss the underlying decay."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The support layer changes slowly or in private, underground, backstage, or unmonitored accounting categories.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P059-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the short-term horizon of the maintained performance.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The maintained performance is short-term rather than indefinitely sustainable.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the source's capability claim and need not require that consumption occurs in every instance.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Consumption of the support stock can maintain that short-term performance.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must make support-stock consumption causally responsible for maintained short-term performance.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "When the capability is exercised, consumption of the underlying support stock is what maintains performance.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This complete branch must identify reserves as the depleted support stock.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The support stock consumed in this branch is reserves.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This complete branch must identify trust as the depleted support stock.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The support stock consumed in this branch is trust.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This complete branch must identify redundancy as the depleted support stock.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The support stock consumed in this branch is redundancy.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This complete branch must identify slack as the depleted support stock.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The support stock consumed in this branch is slack.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This complete branch must identify substrate quality as the depleted support stock.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The support stock consumed in this branch is substrate quality.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Short-term performance can be maintained by consuming reserves, trust, redundancy, slack, or substrate quality.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Consumption of an underlying positive support stock can maintain short-term performance.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P059-C07-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P059-C07", "dnf": [], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [], "predicate": "Short-term performance can be maintained by consuming maintenance backlog.", "resolution": "SOURCE_DEFECT", "semantic_scope": "SOURCE_DEFECT", "structural_head": "The source treats maintenance-backlog consumption as hidden support depletion.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P059-C07-U2"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A reserve can remain untouched while normal performance draws current supply.", "slug": "reserve"}], "residual_id": "r:hidden_support_depletion_guarding:b032_a08_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b032_a08_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Short-term performance can be maintained by consuming reserves, maintenance backlog, trust, redundancy, slack, or substrate quality. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Short-term performance can be maintained by consuming reserves, maintenance backlog, trust, redundancy, slack, or substrate quality."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "SOURCE_REVIEW_REQUIRED", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 1, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A reserve can remain untouched while normal performance draws current supply.", "slug": "reserve"}], "normalized_requirement": "Short-term performance is maintained by consuming reserves, maintenance backlog, trust, redundancy, slack, or substrate quality.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "SOURCE_REVIEW_REQUIRED", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later candidate-blind atomization found that the source wording lacks a relation required by its diagnostic reading, so this is a source-repair issue rather than evidence of a missing abstraction."}, "predicate": "Short-term performance is maintained by consuming reserves, maintenance backlog, trust, redundancy, slack, or substrate quality.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P059-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must distinguish the visible load from the underlying support layer.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A visible load or surface condition is observed separately from an underlying support layer.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This complete branch must entail apparent surface normality rather than established underlying health.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Before the threshold crossing, the visible load appears normal.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This complete branch must entail apparent surface manageability rather than established underlying health.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Before the threshold crossing, the visible load appears manageable.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require an actual threshold crossing in the underlying support layer.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The underlying support layer crosses a collapse threshold.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the visible appearance before and up to the underlying threshold crossing.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The normal- or manageable-looking surface persists until that threshold crossing.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "Visible load appears normal or manageable until the support layer crosses a collapse threshold.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A normal- or manageable-looking surface persists until underlying support crosses a collapse threshold.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P059-C08-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Carrying capacity can be measured before collapse and need not involve a hidden support layer.", "slug": "carrying_capacity"}], "residual_id": "r:hidden_support_depletion_guarding:b032_a08_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b032_a08_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Visible load appears normal or manageable until the support layer crosses a collapse threshold. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Visible load appears normal or manageable until the support layer crosses a collapse threshold."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "If nominal assurance ceased to look intact before enacted protection crossed loss-of-function, the defining assurance-blind divergence of hazard-control decay would be absent.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Hazard-Control Decay", "one_liner": "Track the widening gap between what a safety control's paperwork says it does and what it actually does under hazard, so that a control certified sound by audit can be found silently unprotective before it fails.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:hazard_control_decay", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "hazard_control_decay"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "hazard_control_decay", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P059-C08-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires a certified nominal surface to remain apparently intact while the distinct enacted protection silently erodes through loss of reliable hazard control, satisfying the normality branch."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Visible load appears normal until the support layer crosses a collapse threshold.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P059-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must include stakeholders or observers evaluating a system through its visible surface.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Stakeholders observe the system's surface behavior.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require an absence of visible failure, not a positive measurement of health.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "No surface failure is observed.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail the inference from non-failure at the surface to system health.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Stakeholders treat that absence as evidence that the system is healthy.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Stakeholders interpret the absence of surface failure as evidence of health.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Stakeholders infer system health from the absence of visible failure.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P059-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact anchor treats non-detection as a sensitivity-qualified bound, not proof of health.", "slug": "empirical_no_failure_anchor"}], "residual_id": "r:hidden_support_depletion_guarding:b032_a08_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b032_a08_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Stakeholders interpret the absence of surface failure as evidence of health. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders interpret the absence of surface failure as evidence of health."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact anchor treats non-detection as a sensitivity-qualified bound, not proof of health.", "slug": "empirical_no_failure_anchor"}], "normalized_requirement": "Stakeholders read absence of surface failure as evidence of health.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Stakeholders read absence of surface failure as evidence of health.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P059-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must identify an underlying deficit whose visibility changes over time.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An underlying void, debt, or support deficit exists and can become visible.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the ordering in which visibility of the deficit precedes the harder repair state.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The relevant repair state occurs after the deficit becomes visible.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail a substantial increase in repair difficulty across the visibility transition.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Repair after visibility is materially harder than repair before visibility.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Repair becomes much harder after a void, debt, or support deficit becomes visible.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Repair is materially harder after a hidden support deficit becomes visible than before it does.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P059-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Degradation can remain continuously observable and equally repairable over time.", "slug": "temporal_decay_and_degradation"}], "residual_id": "r:hidden_support_depletion_guarding:b032_a08_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b032_a08_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Repair becomes much harder after the void, debt, or support deficit becomes visible. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Repair becomes much harder after the void, debt, or support deficit becomes visible."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Before the guard, early entropy can remain invisible; once the exact surfacing event occurs, accumulated disorder is visible through impaired development and restoration is materially harder than earlier maintenance.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Software Entropy", "one_liner": "Read a codebase's growing structural disorder as a predictable gradient under continuous modification: locally expedient edits flow toward the vast basin of working-but-disordered states, and order decays monotonically unless restoring engineering effort is continuously reinjected.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:software_entropy", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2"], "guard_type": "MODALITY_ACTUALIZATION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "structural_disorder_has_surfaced", "predicate": "The accumulated structural disorder has reached its exact-record surfacing event.", "rationale": "The one qualifier is candidate-anchored, atomic, non-restating, and sufficient for the retained complete DNF branch."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "software_entropy"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "structural_disorder_has_surfaced"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "software_entropy", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P059-C10-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record supplies hidden accumulating structural debt and a material transition from routine restorative effort to unsafe refactoring and unpredictable change costs; the atomic guard actualizes its own surfacing event."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Repair becomes harder after the support deficit becomes visible.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P059-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must distinguish the visible surface from the underlying support repair target.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The system has a visible surface and an underlying support layer requiring repair.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail incentives directed toward preserving the appearance of an intact surface.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The system's incentive structure favors keeping the surface looking intact.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must make repair deferral an incentive-favored outcome, not merely a permitted or coincident delay.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The same incentive structure favors postponement of repair to the underlying support layer.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "The system has incentives to keep the surface looking intact while postponing support repair.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "System incentives favor intact surface appearance alongside delayed repair of underlying support.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P059-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A bypassed safeguard may be immediate and overt without a surface-performance incentive or deferred repair.", "slug": "bypassed_safeguard"}], "residual_id": "r:hidden_support_depletion_guarding:b032_a08_c7", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b032_a08_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The system has incentives to keep the surface looking intact while postponing support repair. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The system has incentives to keep the surface looking intact while postponing support repair."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A bypassed safeguard may be immediate and overt without a surface-performance incentive or deferred repair.", "slug": "bypassed_safeguard"}], "normalized_requirement": "Incentives reward an intact surface while support repair is postponed.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Incentives reward an intact surface while support repair is postponed.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 32, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-032", "ledger_sha256": "6023271b834e118e764634c13e127bda6ccc326dbb7e7c996ed3bfa39842c2b9"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Hidden-Type Screening", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:hidden_type_screening", "slug": "hidden_type_screening"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is asymmetric information before selection. Candidates, applicants, vendors, patients, users, devices, projects, or artifacts differ in important ways, but the decision-maker cannot directly observe those differences in time. If the system accepts everyone, it may admit avoidable risk or mismatch. If it rejects too broadly, it may exclude valuable or deserving candidates.\n\nThe tension is that the system needs a decision now, while the relevant truth would normally appear only later. Screening creates a controlled pre-commitment encounter that turns some hidden attribute into evidence.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "An uninformed party must choose among candidates whose relevant quality, risk, need, capability, safety, reliability, or intention is hidden, and accepting the wrong candidates would create loss, misallocation, unfairness, or pool degradation."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact screening problem begins with an uninformed designer who cannot directly observe agents' heterogeneous private types.", "role_mapping": "Hidden attribute -> informed type; decision maker -> uninformed designer.", "slug": "screening", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The exact market failure requires a privately observed pre-contract characteristic hidden from the other side.", "role_mapping": "Private attribute -> hidden pre-contract type.", "slug": "adverse_selection", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b032_a09_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Relevant attributes are privately known, costly to observe, delayed, or only revealed after commitment. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Relevant attributes are privately known, costly to observe, delayed, or only revealed after commitment."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Screening", "one_liner": "Inducing self-revelation.", "page_ref": "prime:screening", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Hidden attribute -> informed type; decision maker -> uninformed designer.", "slug": "screening", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact screening problem begins with an uninformed designer who cannot directly observe agents' heterogeneous private types."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Adverse Selection", "one_liner": "Hidden pre-contractual types make participation under uniform terms systematically more attractive to the types worst for the uninformed side, degrading or unraveling the pool.", "page_ref": "prime:adverse_selection", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Private attribute -> hidden pre-contract type.", "slug": "adverse_selection", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact market failure requires a privately observed pre-contract characteristic hidden from the other side."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Decision-relevant attributes are private, costly to observe, delayed, or revealed only after commitment.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Type-dependent willingness to transact under uniform terms systematically changes pool composition.", "role_mapping": "Strategic selection -> type-dependent participation; favorable terms -> uniform contract response.", "slug": "adverse_selection", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b032_a09_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Candidates have incentives to exaggerate, conceal, mimic, or strategically select into favorable terms. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Candidates have incentives to exaggerate, conceal, mimic, or strategically select into favorable terms."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Adverse Selection", "one_liner": "Hidden pre-contractual types make participation under uniform terms systematically more attractive to the types worst for the uninformed side, degrading or unraveling the pool.", "page_ref": "prime:adverse_selection", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Strategic selection -> type-dependent participation; favorable terms -> uniform contract response.", "slug": "adverse_selection", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Type-dependent willingness to transact under uniform terms systematically changes pool composition."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Candidates can strategically select into favorable terms based on private type.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Screening requires unavailable direct observation but does not specify that the reason is one of these operational costs.", "slug": "screening"}], "residual_id": "r:hidden_type_screening:b032_a09_c5", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b032_a09_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Directly observing the target attribute for everyone is too slow, invasive, costly, or unsafe. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Directly observing the target attribute for everyone is too slow, invasive, costly, or unsafe."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Screening requires unavailable direct observation but does not specify that the reason is one of these operational costs.", "slug": "screening"}], "normalized_requirement": "Direct observation of everyone's target attribute is too slow, invasive, costly, or unsafe.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Direct observation of everyone's target attribute is too slow, invasive, costly, or unsafe.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The decision is partially irreversible or costly to undo.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The decision is partially irreversible or costly to undo. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The decision is partially irreversible or costly to undo."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "The decision is partially irreversible or costly to undo."}, {"display_text": "Scarce resources, protected access, shared risk, or high-trust roles are being allocated.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It fits especially well when commitment is costly or risky: hiring, admission, access, procurement, triage, underwriting, funding, security approval, vendor selection, or staged entry into a protected pool. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Scarce resources, protected access, shared risk, or high-trust roles are being allocated. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Scarce resources, protected access, shared risk, or high-trust roles are being allocated.", "It fits especially well when commitment is costly or risky: hiring, admission, access, procurement, triage, underwriting, funding, security approval, vendor selection, or staged entry into a protected pool."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Scarce resources, protected access, shared risk, or high-trust roles are being allocated."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 32, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-032", "ledger_sha256": "6023271b834e118e764634c13e127bda6ccc326dbb7e7c996ed3bfa39842c2b9"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Hierarchical Decomposition", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:hierarchical_decomposition", "slug": "hierarchical_decomposition"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 5 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is flat overload. The system contains too many elements, interactions, decisions, or meanings to be handled as one undifferentiated collection. A flat list hides relationships among parts, gives every detail the same apparent level, and makes it difficult to assign ownership, compare like with like, or roll local information into useful higher-level views.\n\nThe deeper tension is that the system needs both detail and overview. If everything remains detailed, no one can see the whole. If everything is summarized too aggressively, local reality is distorted. Hierarchical Decomposition creates a controlled way to move between these needs.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A complex whole contains too many parts, interactions, decisions, categories, dependencies, or responsibilities to understand, govern, design, or operate effectively as one flat set."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P059-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require a flat or single-level representation rather than merely a large system.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Items are presented in a single-level representation.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the excessive item count, not merely state that multiple items are present.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The representation contains enough items to exceed users' ability to perceive organizing information.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must make flat representational overload responsible for users' inability to see all four organizing-information types.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The excessive item count in the flat representation causes the listed visibility losses.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail actual inability to see structure.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Users cannot see structure.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail actual inability to see priority.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Users cannot see priority.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail actual inability to see ownership.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "Users cannot see ownership.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail actual inability to see dependency.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "Users cannot see dependency.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "A single-level representation contains so many items that users cannot see structure, priority, ownership, or dependency.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Excessive item count in a flat representation obscures organizing information from users.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P059-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A hierarchically decomposable system can already be represented clearly and need not suffer flat overload.", "slug": "hierarchical_decomposability"}], "residual_id": "r:hierarchical_decomposition:b032_a10_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b032_a10_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A single-level representation contains so many items that users cannot see structure, priority, ownership, or dependency. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A single-level representation contains so many items that users cannot see structure, priority, ownership, or dependency."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A hierarchically decomposable system can already be represented clearly and need not suffer flat overload.", "slug": "hierarchical_decomposability"}], "normalized_requirement": "A single-level representation has too many items to expose structure, priority, ownership, or dependency.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A single-level representation has too many items to expose structure, priority, ownership, or dependency.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P059-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the need for the local detail and cannot solve the condition by simply deleting it.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The local detail is necessary rather than dispensable noise.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require undifferentiated top-level exposure of the full detail set.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "All of the local detail is exposed at the top level.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must make top-level detail exposure responsible for the functional overload.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "That exposure overwhelms a system-level function.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This complete branch must entail actual overload of planning.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The system-level function overwhelmed in this branch is planning.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This complete branch must entail actual overload of governance.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The system-level function overwhelmed in this branch is governance.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This complete branch must entail actual overload of comprehension.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The system-level function overwhelmed in this branch is comprehension.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Necessary local detail overwhelms planning, governance, or comprehension when all of it is exposed at the top level.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Exposing all necessary local detail at the top level overloads a system-level function.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P059-C13-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Nested modular structure does not require current exposure of all detail at the top.", "slug": "hierarchical_decomposability"}], "residual_id": "r:hierarchical_decomposition:b032_a10_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b032_a10_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Local detail is necessary, but exposing all detail at the top level overwhelms planning, governance, or comprehension. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Local detail is necessary, but exposing all detail at the top level overwhelms planning, governance, or comprehension."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A high-arity list of genuinely independent variables is explicitly outside the smell; every complete instance instead exposes required information flatly and burdens caller comprehension.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Long Parameter List", "one_liner": "The code smell in which a function requires many separately-supplied inputs at its call boundary because internal complexity was offloaded onto callers — the defect being not the count but hidden co-variation structure that belongs inside the interface.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:long_parameter_list", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "long_parameter_list"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "long_parameter_list", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P059-C13-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every complete exact instance exposes the full necessary input information as a flat call-boundary tuple and thereby overloads comprehension through hidden co-variation and coordination burden."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Necessary local detail overwhelms planning, governance, or comprehension when exposed at the top level.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Nested modules need not carry decision authority or distinct abstraction-level decisions.", "slug": "hierarchical_decomposability"}], "residual_id": "r:hierarchical_decomposition:b032_a10_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b032_a10_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Different decisions belong at different levels of scope, authority, or abstraction. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Different decisions belong at different levels of scope, authority, or abstraction."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Nested modules need not carry decision authority or distinct abstraction-level decisions.", "slug": "hierarchical_decomposability"}], "normalized_requirement": "Different decisions belong at different levels of scope, authority, or abstraction.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Different decisions belong at different levels of scope, authority, or abstraction.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P059-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require repeated decomposition without a consistent governing scheme.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A structure is decomposed repeatedly in an ad hoc manner.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must make repeated ad hoc decomposition responsible for inconsistency among branches under the missing common decomposition scheme, without requiring mutual incompatibility.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "That decomposition creates inconsistent branches.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Repeated ad hoc decomposition creates inconsistent branches.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Repeated uncoordinated decomposition produces branch inconsistency.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P059-C14-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P059-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require repeated decomposition without a consistent governing scheme.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A structure is decomposed repeatedly in an ad hoc manner.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must make the repeated ad hoc decomposition responsible for omitted regions or responsibilities.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "That decomposition creates gaps in coverage.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve that the omissions escape ordinary recognition or visibility.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The resulting gaps are hidden rather than already recognized.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Repeated ad hoc decomposition creates hidden gaps.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Repeated uncoordinated decomposition produces unrecognized coverage gaps.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P059-C14-U2"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P059-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require repeated decomposition without a consistent governing scheme.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A structure is decomposed repeatedly in an ad hoc manner.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must make the repeated ad hoc decomposition responsible for multiple branches claiming the same responsibility.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "That decomposition creates responsibility assignments that overlap.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Repeated ad hoc decomposition creates overlapping responsibilities.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Repeated uncoordinated decomposition assigns overlapping responsibility.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P059-C14-U3"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P059-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require repeated decomposition without a consistent governing scheme.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A structure is decomposed repeatedly in an ad hoc manner.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must make the repeated ad hoc decomposition responsible for summary incomparability.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "That decomposition creates branch summaries lacking a common basis for comparison.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Repeated ad hoc decomposition creates incomparable summaries.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Repeated uncoordinated decomposition produces summaries that cannot be compared consistently.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P059-C14-U4"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A decomposable system can have a consistent non-overlapping hierarchy.", "slug": "hierarchical_decomposability"}], "residual_id": "r:hierarchical_decomposition:b032_a10_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b032_a10_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Repeated ad hoc decomposition creates inconsistent branches, hidden gaps, overlapping responsibilities, or incomparable summaries. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Repeated ad hoc decomposition creates inconsistent branches, hidden gaps, overlapping responsibilities, or incomparable summaries."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 4, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 4}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A decomposable system can have a consistent non-overlapping hierarchy.", "slug": "hierarchical_decomposability"}], "normalized_requirement": "Ad hoc decomposition produces inconsistent branches, gaps, overlaps, or incomparable summaries.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 4 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Ad hoc decomposition produces inconsistent branches, gaps, overlaps, or incomparable summaries.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P059-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require cumulative accretive growth rather than merely a large static system.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The system has grown through accretion.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve that the map deficit follows the accretive growth in the current system state.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The absence of the map is the system's current state after that growth.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require absence of a usable navigational map, not merely an imperfect one.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The system lacks a navigable map.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must cover structural components, nested subcomponents, hierarchy levels, and ownership in the map deficit.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The missing navigable map covers parts, subparts, levels, and ownership together.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "A system that has grown through accretion now lacks a navigable map of its parts, subparts, levels, and ownership.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "After accretive growth, a system lacks a navigable map of its structure and ownership.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P059-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Hierarchical structure need not arise from accretion or lack a navigable map.", "slug": "hierarchical_decomposability"}], "residual_id": "r:hierarchical_decomposition:b032_a10_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b032_a10_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The system has grown through accretion and now lacks a navigable map of parts, subparts, levels, and ownership. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The system has grown through accretion and now lacks a navigable map of parts, subparts, levels, and ownership."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Hierarchical structure need not arise from accretion or lack a navigable map.", "slug": "hierarchical_decomposability"}], "normalized_requirement": "Accretion leaves the system without a navigable map of parts, levels, and ownership.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Accretion leaves the system without a navigable map of parts, levels, and ownership.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Work, components, categories, or responsibilities need to roll up into larger units for planning, review, accounting, explanation, or control.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A complex whole contains too many parts, interactions, decisions, categories, dependencies, or responsibilities to understand, govern, design, or operate effectively as one flat set. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: Work, components, categories, or responsibilities need to roll up into larger units for planning, review, accounting, explanation, or control. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Work, components, categories, or responsibilities need to roll up into larger units for planning, review, accounting, explanation, or control.", "A complex whole contains too many parts, interactions, decisions, categories, dependencies, or responsibilities to understand, govern, design, or operate effectively as one flat set."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Work, components, categories, or responsibilities need to roll up into larger units for planning, review, accounting, explanation, or control."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 32, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-032", "ledger_sha256": "6023271b834e118e764634c13e127bda6ccc326dbb7e7c996ed3bfa39842c2b9"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "High-Dimensional Tractability Control", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:high_dimensional_tractability_control", "slug": "high_dimensional_tractability_control"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system applies familiar low-dimensional reasoning after the number of variables, features, axes, states, segments, or interaction terms has grown enough to change the problem qualitatively. Observations become sparse in the relevant space; distances and neighborhoods stop meaning what they used to mean; many weak or irrelevant variables create spurious separations; interactions multiply faster than evidence; search or enumeration becomes infeasible; and a model can appear accurate by exploiting chance structure that will not transfer. Because the failure is often invisible in aggregate metrics, teams may keep adding dimensions while treating each addition as harmless local detail.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system applies familiar low-dimensional reasoning after the number of variables, features, axes, states, segments, or interaction terms has grown enough to change the problem qualitatively. Observations become sparse in the relevant space; distances and neighborhoods stop meaning what they used to mean; many weak or irrelevant variables create spurious separations; interactions multiply faster than evidence; search or enumeration becomes infeasible; and a model can appear accurate by exploiting chance structure that will not transfer. Because the failure is often invisible in aggregate metrics, teams may keep adding dimensions while treating each addition as harmless local detail."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact pattern pairs independently dimensioned space with a sub-exponential sample or search budget.", "role_mapping": "Many independent axes -> dimensioned state space; limited budget -> collapsing coverage ratio.", "slug": "curse_of_dimensionality", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b032_a11_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The number of candidate variables, features, parameters, segments, states, or interaction terms is large relative to evidence, compute, attention, or validation budget. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The number of candidate variables, features, parameters, segments, states, or interaction terms is large relative to evidence, compute, attention, or validation budget."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Curse Of Dimensionality", "one_liner": "Volume, sparsity, and distance intuitions degrade so fast with added dimensions that low-dimensional methods break down qualitatively, not just quantitatively.", "page_ref": "prime:curse_of_dimensionality", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Many independent axes -> dimensioned state space; limited budget -> collapsing coverage ratio.", "slug": "curse_of_dimensionality", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact pattern pairs independently dimensioned space with a sub-exponential sample or search budget."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Independent variables, features, states, or interactions are numerous relative to evidence, compute, attention, or validation budget.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Dimensionality reduction can be used on independent equally scaled informative axes and does not entail these defects.", "slug": "dimensionality_reduction"}], "residual_id": "r:high_dimensional_tractability_control:b032_a11_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b032_a11_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The representation contains many weak, correlated, redundant, leaking, or differently scaled axes. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The representation contains many weak, correlated, redundant, leaking, or differently scaled axes."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Dimensionality reduction can be used on independent equally scaled informative axes and does not entail these defects.", "slug": "dimensionality_reduction"}], "normalized_requirement": "The representation contains weak, correlated, redundant, leaking, or differently scaled axes.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The representation contains weak, correlated, redundant, leaking, or differently scaled axes.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P060-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must apply the dimensionality tradeoff specifically to a model.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The evaluated procedure is a model.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must make increased dimensionality responsible for improved in-sample fit or performance.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Adding dimensions improves the model's in-sample performance.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the opposed improvement-and-instability tradeoff, not only one side.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The same dimensional increase trades improved in-sample performance against reduced stability.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail actual instability under resampling; mere risk or possibility is insufficient.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The model becomes unstable across resampling.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail actual instability across temporal samples or periods; mere risk or possibility is insufficient.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The model becomes unstable across time.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail actual instability across operational contexts; mere risk or possibility is insufficient.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The model becomes unstable across contexts.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "A model improves in-sample performance as dimensions are added but becomes unstable across resampling, time, or contexts.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Adding dimensions improves a model's in-sample fit while destabilizing its performance outside that fit assessment.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P060-C01-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P060-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must apply the dimensionality tradeoff specifically to search.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The evaluated procedure is a search procedure.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must make increased dimensionality responsible for improved in-sample search performance.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Adding dimensions improves the search procedure's in-sample performance.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the opposed improvement-and-instability tradeoff, not only one side.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The same dimensional increase trades improved in-sample performance against reduced stability.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail actual instability under resampling; mere risk or possibility is insufficient.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The search procedure becomes unstable across resampling.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail actual instability across temporal samples or periods; mere risk or possibility is insufficient.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The search procedure becomes unstable across time.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail actual instability across operational contexts; mere risk or possibility is insufficient.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The search procedure becomes unstable across contexts.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "A search procedure improves in-sample performance as dimensions are added but becomes unstable across resampling, time, or contexts.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Adding dimensions improves a search procedure's in-sample performance while destabilizing its performance outside that assessment.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P060-C01-U2"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P060-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must apply the dimensionality tradeoff specifically to a decision rule.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The evaluated procedure is a decision rule.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must make increased dimensionality responsible for improved in-sample decision performance.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Adding dimensions improves the decision rule's in-sample performance.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the opposed improvement-and-instability tradeoff, not only one side.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The same dimensional increase trades improved in-sample performance against reduced stability.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail actual instability under resampling; mere risk or possibility is insufficient.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The decision rule becomes unstable across resampling.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail actual instability across temporal samples or periods; mere risk or possibility is insufficient.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The decision rule becomes unstable across time.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail actual instability across operational contexts; mere risk or possibility is insufficient.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The decision rule becomes unstable across contexts.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "A decision rule improves in-sample performance as dimensions are added but becomes unstable across resampling, time, or contexts.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Adding dimensions improves a decision rule's in-sample performance while destabilizing its performance outside that assessment.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P060-C01-U3"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Overfitting can arise at fixed dimension from noise fitting and does not require dimensions to be added.", "slug": "overfitting"}], "residual_id": "r:high_dimensional_tractability_control:b032_a11_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b032_a11_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A model, search, or decision rule improves in-sample performance as dimensions are added but becomes unstable across resampling, time, or contexts. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A model, search, or decision rule improves in-sample performance as dimensions are added but becomes unstable across resampling, time, or contexts."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 3, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 3}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Overfitting can arise at fixed dimension from noise fitting and does not require dimensions to be added.", "slug": "overfitting"}], "normalized_requirement": "Adding dimensions improves in-sample fit but destabilizes performance across resampling, time, or contexts.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 3 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Adding dimensions improves in-sample fit but destabilizes performance across resampling, time, or contexts.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P060-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must include human claim-making based on examples from a low-dimensional setting.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "People reason from low-dimensional examples.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require a material increase in dimensionality between the example and target spaces.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The operational space is much higher-dimensional than the examples.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve that the high-dimensional target state precedes the continued low-dimensional claim.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The claim is made after the operational space has become much higher-dimensional.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail a visual claim grounded in the low-dimensional example.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The low-dimensional example is used as the basis for a visual claim in the target space.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail a geometric claim grounded in the low-dimensional example.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The low-dimensional example is used as the basis for a geometric claim in the target space.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail an intuitive claim grounded in the low-dimensional example.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The low-dimensional example is used as the basis for an intuitive claim in the target space.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "People make visual, geometric, or intuitive claims from low-dimensional examples after the operational space has become much higher-dimensional.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "People extrapolate low-dimensional reasoning into a much higher-dimensional operational space.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P060-C02-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The curse can be diagnosed computationally without anyone making a visual or intuitive extrapolation.", "slug": "curse_of_dimensionality"}], "residual_id": "r:high_dimensional_tractability_control:b032_a11_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b032_a11_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: People make visual, geometric, or intuitive claims based on low-dimensional examples after the operational space has become much higher-dimensional. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["People make visual, geometric, or intuitive claims based on low-dimensional examples after the operational space has become much higher-dimensional."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The curse can be diagnosed computationally without anyone making a visual or intuitive extrapolation.", "slug": "curse_of_dimensionality"}], "normalized_requirement": "People extrapolate low-dimensional visual or geometric intuition to a much higher-dimensional operational space.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "People extrapolate low-dimensional visual or geometric intuition to a much higher-dimensional operational space.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Exponential state-space volume against sub-exponential search budget makes enumeration and coverage collapse.", "role_mapping": "Independent choices -> dimensions; impractical enumeration -> exponential volume gap.", "slug": "curse_of_dimensionality", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b032_a11_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Search or optimization must consider many independent choices, and brute-force enumeration becomes impractical. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Search or optimization must consider many independent choices, and brute-force enumeration becomes impractical."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Curse Of Dimensionality", "one_liner": "Volume, sparsity, and distance intuitions degrade so fast with added dimensions that low-dimensional methods break down qualitatively, not just quantitatively.", "page_ref": "prime:curse_of_dimensionality", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Independent choices -> dimensions; impractical enumeration -> exponential volume gap.", "slug": "curse_of_dimensionality", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Exponential state-space volume against sub-exponential search budget makes enumeration and coverage collapse."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Search must consider many independent choices and brute-force enumeration is impractical.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A method depends on nearest neighbors, clusters, local smoothness, interpolation, binning, or subgroup coverage.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: A method depends on nearest neighbors, clusters, local smoothness, interpolation, binning, or subgroup coverage. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A method depends on nearest neighbors, clusters, local smoothness, interpolation, binning, or subgroup coverage."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "A method depends on nearest neighbors, clusters, local smoothness, interpolation, binning, or subgroup coverage."}, {"display_text": "Domain knowledge suggests exploitable structure, but that structure has not been stated or tested.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Domain knowledge suggests exploitable structure, but that structure has not been stated or tested. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Domain knowledge suggests exploitable structure, but that structure has not been stated or tested."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "Domain knowledge suggests exploitable structure, but that structure has not been stated or tested."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 32, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-032", "ledger_sha256": "6023271b834e118e764634c13e127bda6ccc326dbb7e7c996ed3bfa39842c2b9"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Higher-Order Expectation Anchoring", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:higher_order_expectation_anchoring", "slug": "higher_order_expectation_anchoring"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Actors choose under a recursive expectation field: the selected option is determined by beliefs about others’ beliefs rather than by private preference, direct evidence, or a stable decision rule. Because public signals feed back into those beliefs, weak cues can become self-confirming outcomes.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Actors choose under a recursive expectation field: the selected option is determined by beliefs about others’ beliefs rather than by private preference, direct evidence, or a stable decision rule. Because public signals feed back into those beliefs, weak cues can become self-confirming outcomes."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact recursive coordination game realizes a self-fulfilling focal equilibrium that can shift with expectations.", "role_mapping": "Expected selection -> higher-order belief; self-consistent outcome -> self-fulfilling equilibrium.", "slug": "keynesian_beauty_contest", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b032_a12_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Several outcomes could become self-consistent if enough actors expect them to be chosen. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Several outcomes could become self-consistent if enough actors expect them to be chosen."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Keynesian Beauty Contest", "one_liner": "The rational choice is not what you most prefer, nor what you think others prefer, but what you think others believe others will choose.", "page_ref": "prime:keynesian_beauty_contest", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Expected selection -> higher-order belief; self-consistent outcome -> self-fulfilling equilibrium.", "slug": "keynesian_beauty_contest", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact recursive coordination game realizes a self-fulfilling focal equilibrium that can shift with expectations."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Several outcomes can become self-consistent if enough actors expect them to be selected.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Payoff depends on anticipating or matching population choice rather than intrinsic preference.", "role_mapping": "Group selection -> coordination target; actor concern -> convergence payoff.", "slug": "keynesian_beauty_contest", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b032_a12_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Actors care about matching, anticipating, avoiding, or profiting from the group’s eventual selection. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Actors care about matching, anticipating, avoiding, or profiting from the group’s eventual selection."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Keynesian Beauty Contest", "one_liner": "The rational choice is not what you most prefer, nor what you think others prefer, but what you think others believe others will choose.", "page_ref": "prime:keynesian_beauty_contest", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Group selection -> coordination target; actor concern -> convergence payoff.", "slug": "keynesian_beauty_contest", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Payoff depends on anticipating or matching population choice rather than intrinsic preference."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Actors care about matching, anticipating, avoiding, or profiting from the group's eventual selection.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P060-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must identify a publicly or otherwise visibly observable signal.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A signal is visible to an observer.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail an evidential interpretation, not merely simultaneous observation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The observer interprets the visible signal as evidence.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must direct the inference toward what other actors will choose or do.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The inferred behavior belongs to actors other than the observer.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must concern predicted future behavior rather than only current or past conduct.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The inferred choices or actions are future behavior.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "Visible signals, including polls, prices, rankings, endorsements, trend metrics, public commitments, or silence, are interpreted as evidence of what others will do.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Visible signals are interpreted as evidence of other actors' future choices.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P060-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Higher-order beliefs can be formed without any of these visible public signals.", "slug": "keynesian_beauty_contest"}], "residual_id": "r:higher_order_expectation_anchoring:b032_a12_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b032_a12_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Visible signals such as polls, prices, rankings, endorsements, trend metrics, public commitments, or silence are interpreted as evidence of what others will do. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Visible signals such as polls, prices, rankings, endorsements, trend metrics, public commitments, or silence are interpreted as evidence of what others will do."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Higher-order beliefs can be formed without any of these visible public signals.", "slug": "keynesian_beauty_contest"}], "normalized_requirement": "Polls, prices, rankings, endorsements, trends, commitments, or silence are used as evidence of others' future choices.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Polls, prices, rankings, endorsements, trends, commitments, or silence are used as evidence of others' future choices.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P060-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"], ["O1", "O3"], ["O1", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require incomplete observability rather than merely costly or delayed observation.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The relevant private information is not fully observable to others.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must cover limited observability of private preferences.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The incompletely observable information can be private preferences.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must cover limited observability of private evidence.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The incompletely observable information can be private evidence.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must cover limited observability of private fundamentals.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The incompletely observable information can be private fundamentals.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Private preferences, evidence, or fundamentals are not fully observable.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Decision-relevant private information is only partially observable.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P060-C04-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P060-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"], ["O1", "O3"], ["O1", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail an incentive for strategic misrepresentation, not merely that error or secrecy is possible.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Actors have incentives to misrepresent private information.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must cover incentivized misrepresentation of private preferences.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The misrepresented information can be private preferences.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must cover incentivized misrepresentation of private evidence.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The misrepresented information can be private evidence.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must cover incentivized misrepresentation of private fundamentals.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The misrepresented information can be private fundamentals.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Actors have incentives to misrepresent their private preferences, evidence, or fundamentals.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Actors are incentivized to misrepresent decision-relevant private information.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P060-C04-U2"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The contest can operate when preferences and fundamentals are public but matching expected selection still pays.", "slug": "keynesian_beauty_contest"}], "residual_id": "r:higher_order_expectation_anchoring:b032_a12_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b032_a12_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Private preferences, evidence, or fundamentals are not fully observable, or actors have incentives to misrepresent them. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Private preferences, evidence, or fundamentals are not fully observable, or actors have incentives to misrepresent them."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PARTIALLY_DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A purported complete instance with fully public preferences would no longer be a Bayesian game of incomplete information with player-private types.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Bayesian Nash Equilibrium", "one_liner": "The solution concept for games of incomplete information: recast not knowing an opponent's payoffs as Nature drawing each player's private type from a common prior, then solve for a fixed point of type-conditional strategy functions where every type's action is a best response in expectation and the supporting beliefs are Bayes-consistent.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:bayesian_nash_equilibrium", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "bayesian_nash_equilibrium"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "bayesian_nash_equilibrium", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P060-C04-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every Bayesian Nash equilibrium instance contains payoff-relevant private types observed only by their owners, so the private-preference DNF branch O1 plus O2 is directly entailed."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A purported complete instance without private evidence about an unobserved fundamental would lack the private-signal perturbation that defines a global game.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Global Games", "one_liner": "Pick a single prediction out of a coordination game's many self-fulfilling equilibria by giving each player a private noisy signal of a common fundamental and deleting dominated strategies inward until one threshold cutoff survives.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:global_games", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "global_games"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "global_games", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P060-C04-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every global-game instance gives each player a private noisy signal of a common unobserved fundamental, directly satisfying the private-evidence DNF branch O1 plus O3."}], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 2, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 1, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The contest can operate when preferences and fundamentals are public but matching expected selection still pays.", "slug": "keynesian_beauty_contest"}], "normalized_requirement": "Private preferences, evidence, or fundamentals are unobservable or strategically misrepresented.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "PARTIAL_EXISTING_DSA_GROUNDING", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation grounded 1 of 2 eligible atomic units; the remaining unit or units stayed open."}, "predicate": "Private preferences, evidence, or fundamentals are unobservable or strategically misrepresented.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact coordination payoff penalizes choosing intrinsic value when the population converges elsewhere.", "role_mapping": "Isolation cost -> mismatch penalty; optimization -> higher-order prediction.", "slug": "keynesian_beauty_contest", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b032_a12_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The cost of being early, wrong, isolated, or unfashionable is high enough that actors optimize against expected collective selection. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The cost of being early, wrong, isolated, or unfashionable is high enough that actors optimize against expected collective selection."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Keynesian Beauty Contest", "one_liner": "The rational choice is not what you most prefer, nor what you think others prefer, but what you think others believe others will choose.", "page_ref": "prime:keynesian_beauty_contest", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Isolation cost -> mismatch penalty; optimization -> higher-order prediction.", "slug": "keynesian_beauty_contest", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact coordination payoff penalizes choosing intrinsic value when the population converges elsewhere."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The cost of being early, wrong, isolated, or unfashionable makes actors optimize against expected collective selection.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The focal equilibrium and fundamentals anchor can shift the recursive belief target discontinuously.", "role_mapping": "Common anchor -> focal point; beliefs about beliefs -> higher-order tower.", "slug": "keynesian_beauty_contest", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b032_a12_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A credible common anchor, rule, or reference point could change what actors believe others will believe. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A credible common anchor, rule, or reference point could change what actors believe others will believe."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Keynesian Beauty Contest", "one_liner": "The rational choice is not what you most prefer, nor what you think others prefer, but what you think others believe others will choose.", "page_ref": "prime:keynesian_beauty_contest", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Common anchor -> focal point; beliefs about beliefs -> higher-order tower.", "slug": "keynesian_beauty_contest", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The focal equilibrium and fundamentals anchor can shift the recursive belief target discontinuously."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A credible common anchor or reference point could change what actors believe others will believe.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 32, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-032", "ledger_sha256": "6023271b834e118e764634c13e127bda6ccc326dbb7e7c996ed3bfa39842c2b9"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Historical Contextualization", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:historical_contextualization", "slug": "historical_contextualization"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 4, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 2, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 3, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 3 of 4 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is interpretation across a context gap. A present observer sees a past action with later knowledge, later tools, later institutions, and later categories. The result can be unfair blame, excessive excuse, false lessons, anachronism, or moral flattening.\n\nThe problem becomes severe when the account will shape learning, policy, public memory, legal reasoning, education, or organizational accountability. If the context is wrong, the lesson drawn from the past will also be wrong.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "An actor, event, artifact, institution, or decision is interpreted as if it belonged to the present observer’s knowledge world, value system, categories, technologies, or institutional options, producing hindsight distortion, anachronism, over-blame, over-excuse, or false lessons."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P060-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must include later outcome knowledge unavailable at the time of the past conduct.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An observer knows an outcome that occurred after a past actor's conduct.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must concern retrospective judgment of an earlier actor, not only prediction of future conduct.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The object of judgment is a past actor.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must make later knowledge exert hindsight pressure, bias, or distortion on retrospective judgment; neutral or correctly calibrated evidential updating is insufficient.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The later-outcome knowledge pressures, biases, or distorts that judgment.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Knowledge of later outcomes pressures judgment of past actors.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Later-outcome knowledge pressures, biases, or distorts retrospective judgment of earlier actors.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P060-C05-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Presentism can import current concepts without relying on knowledge of later outcomes.", "slug": "presentism"}], "residual_id": "r:historical_contextualization:b032_a13_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b032_a13_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Hindsight judgment pressure. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["hindsight_judgment_pressure"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Without the guard, hindsight bias can reconstruct one's own prior estimate; with the guard fixed, the target is necessarily a past actor and the defining hindsight gap supplies the distortion.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Hindsight Bias", "one_liner": "The tendency, once an outcome is known, to inflate its perceived prior probability and misremember one's own judgment as closer to it than it was, because outcome knowledge is folded into the memory of the prior situation and reconstructs rather than retrieves it.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:hindsight_bias", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "judgment_targets_past_actor", "predicate": "The outcome-informed retrospective judgment is directed at a past actor.", "rationale": "Independent exact-record review confirms a complete DNF branch and a publication-safe expression; any qualifier is one candidate-anchored atomic restriction."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "hindsight_bias"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "judgment_targets_past_actor"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "hindsight_bias", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P060-C05-U1", "why_it_fits": "Hindsight bias directly supplies later-outcome contamination of retrospective judgment. The one guard restricts the already-existing outcome-informed judgment to a past actor and adds no new causal relation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Knowledge of later outcomes pressures judgment of past actors.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact error imports the interpreter's present conceptual and information frame instead of reconstructing the past frame.", "role_mapping": "Modern category -> present frame; past context -> target historical frame.", "slug": "presentism", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b032_a13_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Modern category projection. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["modern_category_projection"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Presentism", "one_liner": "Applying modern views to past.", "page_ref": "prime:presentism", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Modern category -> present frame; past context -> target historical frame.", "slug": "presentism", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact error imports the interpreter's present conceptual and information frame instead of reconstructing the past frame."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Modern categories are projected into a past context.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P060-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must concern evaluation of an actor situated in an earlier historical setting.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A past actor is the object of retrospective evaluation.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must specifically entail normative ethical judgment rather than neutral description.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The evaluation is ethical or moral judgment.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require omission of contextual reconstruction when the ethical judgment is made.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The actor's historical context is not reconstructed for the judgment.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Past actors receive ethical judgment without reconstruction of their historical context.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An earlier actor is ethically judged without reconstructing the actor's historical context.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P060-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Presentism can import modern scientific or conceptual categories without making an ethical judgment.", "slug": "presentism"}], "residual_id": "r:historical_contextualization:b032_a13_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b032_a13_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Ethical judgment without context. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["ethical_judgment_without_context"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Presentism can import modern scientific or conceptual categories without making an ethical judgment.", "slug": "presentism"}], "normalized_requirement": "Past actors receive ethical judgment without reconstruction of their context.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Past actors receive ethical judgment without reconstruction of their context.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P060-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must concern causal attribution for a historical outcome.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A historical outcome is being causally explained.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must assign causal weight specifically to individual historical actors.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Individual actors are assigned causal responsibility for the outcome.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail over-attribution, not merely some legitimate role for individual agency.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The causal weight assigned to individual actors exceeds what is warranted.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Historical outcomes are attributed more heavily to individual actors than the evidence warrants.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Causal attribution for a historical outcome gives excessive weight to individual actors.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P060-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Great-man explanation can be offered with extensive context and does not necessarily overattribute a particular outcome.", "slug": "great_man_theory"}], "residual_id": "r:historical_contextualization:b032_a13_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b032_a13_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Over personalized attribution. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["over_personalized_attribution"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_GUARDED_EQUIVALENT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Without the guard the salient attribute may be non-actor-related; with it fixed as an individual's causal contribution, absence of excessive weight contradicts the focusing effect.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Focusing Effect (Focusing Illusion)", "one_liner": "Systematically overweight whatever attribute attention currently rests on when judging a complex multi-attribute target, so the focused feature dominates the constructed evaluation far above its real causal contribution while everything below the attentional threshold recedes.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:focusing_effect", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1", "O2"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "focused_attribute_is_actor_causal_contribution", "predicate": "The focused attribute is an individual actor's causal contribution to a historical outcome.", "rationale": "Independent exact-record review confirms a complete DNF branch and a publication-safe expression; any qualifier is one candidate-anchored atomic restriction."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "focusing_effect"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "focused_attribute_is_actor_causal_contribution"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "focusing_effect", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P060-C07-U1", "why_it_fits": "The focusing effect directly supplies causal overweighting within a multi-attribute judgment; one candidate-anchored role restriction makes the focused attribute an individual actor's contribution to a historical outcome."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Historical outcomes are attributed too heavily to individual actors.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "DISJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Retrospective learning risk.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source states: Retrospective learning risk. The normalized contextual consideration is: Retrospective learning risk. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["retrospective_learning_risk"]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "retrospective_learning_risk"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 32, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-032", "ledger_sha256": "6023271b834e118e764634c13e127bda6ccc326dbb7e7c996ed3bfa39842c2b9"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Holonic Autonomy Nesting", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:holonic_autonomy_nesting", "slug": "holonic_autonomy_nesting"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system contains nested units—people, teams, modules, cells, agencies, ecosystems, documents, services, or institutions—that must function as coherent local wholes while also serving larger wholes. Existing structure overemphasizes one side: either top-down hierarchy turns units into passive parts, or local autonomy fragments the system into incompatible islands. Without explicit holonic design, local decisions damage higher-level coherence, higher-level control suppresses adaptation, and boundary ambiguity causes accountability, interface, or escalation failures.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system contains nested units—people, teams, modules, cells, agencies, ecosystems, documents, services, or institutions—that must function as coherent local wholes while also serving larger wholes. Existing structure overemphasizes one side: either top-down hierarchy turns units into passive parts, or local autonomy fragments the system into incompatible islands. Without explicit holonic design, local decisions damage higher-level coherence, higher-level control suppresses adaptation, and boundary ambiguity causes accountability, interface, or escalation failures."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact structure gives every nested holon genuine downward autonomy to act, regulate, and maintain itself.", "role_mapping": "Nested levels -> recursive holons; local capacity -> downward autonomy.", "slug": "holarchy", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b032_a14_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A system has multiple nested levels and each level needs some capacity to sense, decide, repair, and adapt locally. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A system has multiple nested levels and each level needs some capacity to sense, decide, repair, and adapt locally."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Holarchy", "one_liner": "Nested ordering in which each unit is at once an autonomous whole and a dependent part.", "page_ref": "prime:holarchy", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Nested levels -> recursive holons; local capacity -> downward autonomy.", "slug": "holarchy", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact structure gives every nested holon genuine downward autonomy to act, regulate, and maintain itself."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A system has nested levels whose units need local sensing, decision, repair, and adaptation capacity.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Each holon is simultaneously an autonomous whole and a dependent part integrated into a larger whole.", "role_mapping": "Local independence -> whole role; larger-system effects -> part role.", "slug": "holarchy", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b032_a14_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Local units need independence, identity, or discretion, but their outputs, risks, or obligations materially affect larger systems. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Local units need independence, identity, or discretion, but their outputs, risks, or obligations materially affect larger systems."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Holarchy", "one_liner": "Nested ordering in which each unit is at once an autonomous whole and a dependent part.", "page_ref": "prime:holarchy", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Local independence -> whole role; larger-system effects -> part role.", "slug": "holarchy", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Each holon is simultaneously an autonomous whole and a dependent part integrated into a larger whole."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Local units need independence and identity while their outputs and risks affect larger systems.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A holarchy can exist without a prior failure of either organizational extreme.", "slug": "holarchy"}], "residual_id": "r:holonic_autonomy_nesting:b032_a14_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b032_a14_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A strict hierarchy is too slow, brittle, or information-poor, yet a flat network lacks enough coherence, accountability, or shared invariant control. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A strict hierarchy is too slow, brittle, or information-poor, yet a flat network lacks enough coherence, accountability, or shared invariant control."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A holarchy can exist without a prior failure of either organizational extreme.", "slug": "holarchy"}], "normalized_requirement": "Strict hierarchy is too slow or brittle while a flat network lacks coherence or accountability.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Strict hierarchy is too slow or brittle while a flat network lacks coherence or accountability.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P060-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O9"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O10"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail isolated-part treatment rather than merely local autonomy.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The relevant unit is treated or represented as an isolated part.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the unit's necessity to maintain its own internal organization.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The same unit must maintain internal structure.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must connect the treatment and requirement as a structural mismatch.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The isolated-part treatment conflicts with the unit's internal-structure requirement.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must apply the mismatch to a team.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The unit can be a team.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must apply the mismatch to a module.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The unit can be a module.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must apply the mismatch to an agency.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The unit can be an agency.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must apply the mismatch to an ecological unit.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The unit can be an ecological unit.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must apply the mismatch to a curriculum unit.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The unit can be a curriculum unit.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must apply the mismatch to a platform extension.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "The unit can be a platform extension.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must apply the mismatch to an autonomous agent.", "obligation_id": "O10", "statement": "The unit can be an autonomous agent.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Teams, modules, agencies, ecological units, curriculum units, platform extensions, or autonomous agents are treated as isolated parts even though each must maintain internal structure.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An internally organized unit is treated as an isolated part despite needing to maintain its own structure.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P060-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Holarchic units may already be recognized in their whole-and-part roles.", "slug": "holarchy"}], "residual_id": "r:holonic_autonomy_nesting:b032_a14_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b032_a14_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Teams, modules, agencies, ecological units, curriculum units, platform extensions, or autonomous agents are treated as isolated parts even though each must maintain internal structure. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Teams, modules, agencies, ecological units, curriculum units, platform extensions, or autonomous agents are treated as isolated parts even though each must maintain internal structure."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Holarchic units may already be recognized in their whole-and-part roles.", "slug": "holarchy"}], "normalized_requirement": "Units are treated as isolated parts despite needing to maintain internal structure.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Units are treated as isolated parts despite needing to maintain internal structure.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P060-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must make increased scale responsible for the tension rather than merely coexist with it.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The system's scaling creates the relevant tension.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must include a requirement for local units to adapt to their conditions.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "One side of the tension is adaptation by local units.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must include a requirement for standards to hold across levels.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The other side is standardization across system levels.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail incompatibility or tradeoff between local adaptation and cross-level standardization.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The two requirements are in tension as the system scales.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Scaling creates tension between local adaptation and standardization across levels.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "System scaling creates tension between local adaptation and cross-level standardization.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P060-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A holarchy can remain at stable scale with compatible local autonomy and global coherence.", "slug": "holarchy"}], "residual_id": "r:holonic_autonomy_nesting:b032_a14_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b032_a14_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Scaling creates tension between local adaptation and standardization across levels. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Scaling creates tension between local adaptation and standardization across levels."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Without the guard the grain mismatch can occur in a fixed-size system; with scaling fixed as its cause, the standardized-rule versus local-choice tension remains constitutive.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Rules-of-Engagement Ambiguity", "one_liner": "Diagnose frontline breakdown under time pressure as a grain mismatch — decision rules written coarser than the environment generates choice points — paid out of a finite discretion budget, relocating the fix from the operator's judgment to the rule, escalation path, and pre-positioned authority.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:rules_of_engagement_ambiguity", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "OTHER", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "scaling_creates_rule_grain_mismatch", "predicate": "Scaling the system creates this cross-level rule-grain versus local-choice-point mismatch.", "rationale": "Independent exact-record review confirms a complete DNF branch and a publication-safe expression; any qualifier is one candidate-anchored atomic restriction."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "rules_of_engagement_ambiguity"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "scaling_creates_rule_grain_mismatch"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "rules_of_engagement_ambiguity", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P060-C10-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record supplies the cross-level tension between standardized doctrine grain and locally adaptive discretion. One causal qualifier binds that existing mismatch to system scaling."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Scaling creates tension between local adaptation and cross-level standardization.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A merger, platform transition, governance redesign, system-of-systems effort, or multi-scale resilience plan requires compatible autonomy at several levels.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The archetype manages the tension between self-governance and contribution, local identity and shared invariants, nested boundary and cross-level accountability. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: A merger, platform transition, governance redesign, system-of-systems effort, or multi-scale resilience plan requires compatible autonomy at several levels. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A merger, platform transition, governance redesign, system-of-systems effort, or multi-scale resilience plan requires compatible autonomy at several levels.", "The archetype manages the tension between self-governance and contribution, local identity and shared invariants, nested boundary and cross-level accountability."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "A merger, platform transition, governance redesign, system-of-systems effort, or multi-scale resilience plan requires compatible autonomy at several levels."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 32, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-032", "ledger_sha256": "6023271b834e118e764634c13e127bda6ccc326dbb7e7c996ed3bfa39842c2b9"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Homeostatic Regulation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:homeostatic_regulation", "slug": "homeostatic_regulation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is drift away from viability. A system is exposed to recurring internal or external disturbances, but the variable that matters is either not sensed, not compared against a meaningful range, or not tied to a corrective actuator. As a result, intervention happens too late, too strongly, too weakly, or only through informal heroics.\n\nThe root tension is that ordinary variation must be tolerated, but unbounded drift must not be allowed. Too little correction permits breakdown; too much correction can create oscillation, waste, surveillance burden, or harm.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A vital variable can drift outside its viable range, threatening function, safety, quality, continuity, or legitimacy."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A homeostatic loop can reject one perturbation or continuous noise without recurring drift episodes.", "slug": "homeostasis"}], "residual_id": "r:homeostatic_regulation:b032_a15_c1", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b032_a15_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Recurring drift. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Recurring drift"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A homeostatic loop can reject one perturbation or continuous noise without recurring drift episodes.", "slug": "homeostasis"}], "normalized_requirement": "The regulated variable exhibits recurring drift.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The regulated variable exhibits recurring drift.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact loop has a setpoint and explicit tolerance band for the regulated plant state.", "role_mapping": "Viability range -> tolerance band.", "slug": "homeostasis", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b032_a15_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Known viability range. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Known viability range"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Homeostasis", "one_liner": "Maintain internal stability.", "page_ref": "prime:homeostasis", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Viability range -> tolerance band.", "slug": "homeostasis", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact loop has a setpoint and explicit tolerance band for the regulated plant state."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A viable or acceptable range for the regulated variable is known.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Negative feedback senses error and applies bounded correction that drives the state back toward setpoint.", "role_mapping": "Deviation -> comparator error; correctable -> controller and actuator authority.", "slug": "homeostasis", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b032_a15_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Correctable deviation. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Correctable deviation"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Homeostasis", "one_liner": "Maintain internal stability.", "page_ref": "prime:homeostasis", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Deviation -> comparator error; correctable -> controller and actuator authority.", "slug": "homeostasis", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Negative feedback senses error and applies bounded correction that drives the state back toward setpoint."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Deviation from the acceptable range can be corrected.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Closed-loop sensing repeatedly measures plant state to update corrective action.", "role_mapping": "Repeated observation -> sensor feedback.", "slug": "homeostasis", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b032_a15_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Repeated observation is feasible. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Repeated observation is feasible"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Homeostasis", "one_liner": "Maintain internal stability.", "page_ref": "prime:homeostasis", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Repeated observation -> sensor feedback.", "slug": "homeostasis", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Closed-loop sensing repeatedly measures plant state to update corrective action."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Repeated observation of the regulated state is feasible.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The regulator exists to preserve a viable or acceptable band against disturbances; leaving it unregulated defeats that viability criterion.", "role_mapping": "Cost or harm -> consequence of leaving tolerance band.", "slug": "homeostasis", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b032_a15_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Unregulated variation creates cost or harm. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Unregulated variation creates cost or harm"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Homeostasis", "one_liner": "Maintain internal stability.", "page_ref": "prime:homeostasis", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Cost or harm -> consequence of leaving tolerance band.", "slug": "homeostasis", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The regulator exists to preserve a viable or acceptable band against disturbances; leaving it unregulated defeats that viability criterion."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Unregulated variation outside the band creates cost or harm.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 32, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-032", "ledger_sha256": "6023271b834e118e764634c13e127bda6ccc326dbb7e7c996ed3bfa39842c2b9"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Horizon-Calibrated Impact Forecasting", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:horizon_calibrated_impact_forecasting", "slug": "horizon_calibrated_impact_forecasting"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A decision-maker, organization, market, or public body evaluates a new technology or intervention using a single linear narrative. Salient early evidence, promotional incentives, or dramatic prototypes make near-term transformation look inevitable, while slow adoption, integration friction, complementary assets, learning curves, and eventual compounding effects are poorly represented.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A decision-maker, organization, market, or public body evaluates a new technology or intervention using a single linear narrative. Salient early evidence, promotional incentives, or dramatic prototypes make near-term transformation look inevitable, while slow adoption, integration friction, complementary assets, learning curves, and eventual compounding effects are poorly represented."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Amara's law requires signed forecast errors but not intense attention or public salience.", "slug": "amaras_law"}], "residual_id": "r:horizon_calibrated_impact_forecasting:b033_a01_c1", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b033_a01_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A new technology, policy, model, platform, process, or intervention is receiving intense attention but its realized system-level impact is still uncertain. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A new technology, policy, model, platform, process, or intervention is receiving intense attention but its realized system-level impact is still uncertain."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Amara's law requires signed forecast errors but not intense attention or public salience.", "slug": "amaras_law"}], "normalized_requirement": "A new intervention receives intense attention while realized system-level impact remains uncertain.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A new intervention receives intense attention while realized system-level impact remains uncertain.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact pattern anchors on a salient early signal and linearly projects it onto the impact trajectory.", "role_mapping": "Early demonstration -> salient signal; broad claim -> linear extrapolation.", "slug": "amaras_law", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b033_a01_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Early demonstrations, pilots, laboratory results, media coverage, investor enthusiasm, or first deployments are being extrapolated into broad impact claims. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Early demonstrations, pilots, laboratory results, media coverage, investor enthusiasm, or first deployments are being extrapolated into broad impact claims."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Amara's Law", "one_liner": "The impact of a new technology or intervention is systematically overestimated over short horizons and underestimated over long ones, because forecasters project linearly from a salient early signal onto a non-linear, slowly compounding realization curve.", "page_ref": "prime:amaras_law", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Early demonstration -> salient signal; broad claim -> linear extrapolation.", "slug": "amaras_law", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact pattern anchors on a salient early signal and linearly projects it onto the impact trajectory."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Early demonstrations, pilots, coverage, enthusiasm, or deployments are extrapolated into broad impact claims.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Missed early-adoption friction and complementary-asset gaps produce the mandatory short-horizon overestimate.", "role_mapping": "Complementary requirement -> early realization friction.", "slug": "amaras_law", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b033_a01_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The intervention requires complementary infrastructure, standards, regulation, trust, training, workflow redesign, behavior change, or network adoption before it can scale. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The intervention requires complementary infrastructure, standards, regulation, trust, training, workflow redesign, behavior change, or network adoption before it can scale."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Amara's Law", "one_liner": "The impact of a new technology or intervention is systematically overestimated over short horizons and underestimated over long ones, because forecasters project linearly from a salient early signal onto a non-linear, slowly compounding realization curve.", "page_ref": "prime:amaras_law", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Complementary requirement -> early realization friction.", "slug": "amaras_law", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Missed early-adoption friction and complementary-asset gaps produce the mandatory short-horizon overestimate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Complementary infrastructure, standards, regulation, trust, training, workflow change, behavior, or adoption is required before scale.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P060-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must concern earlier forecasts rather than only a presently contemplated forecast.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The forecasts are prior to the current evaluation.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require an analogy between the prior forecast domains and the current evaluation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The prior forecasts concern situations analogous to the present one.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail oscillation across both expectation poles, not just isolated optimism or pessimism.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The forecasts swung between hype and disillusionment.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must make the hype-disillusionment swing responsible for the harmful response.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The forecast oscillation causes a harmful response.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail excessive investment.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The harmful response can be overinvestment.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail abandonment of the initiative or domain.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The harmful response can be abandonment.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail mistrust among the public.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The harmful response can be public mistrust.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Prior analogous forecasts have swung between hype and disillusionment, causing overinvestment, abandonment, or public mistrust.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Oscillation between hype and disillusionment in prior analogous forecasts causes harmful overreaction.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P060-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The paired horizon error can occur without prior analogous forecasts or organizational overreaction.", "slug": "amaras_law"}], "residual_id": "r:horizon_calibrated_impact_forecasting:b033_a01_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b033_a01_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Prior analogous forecasts have swung between hype and disillusionment, causing overinvestment, abandonment, or public mistrust. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Prior analogous forecasts have swung between hype and disillusionment, causing overinvestment, abandonment, or public mistrust."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The paired horizon error can occur without prior analogous forecasts or organizational overreaction.", "slug": "amaras_law"}], "normalized_requirement": "Analogous forecasts swung between hype and disillusionment, causing overinvestment, abandonment, or mistrust.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Analogous forecasts swung between hype and disillusionment, causing overinvestment, abandonment, or mistrust.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Slow compounding of complementary changes and second-order diffusion produces the exact long-horizon underestimate.", "role_mapping": "Diffusion and compounding -> nonlinear long-run realization.", "slug": "amaras_law", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b033_a01_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The most important consequences may emerge through diffusion, compounding, second-order effects, or institutional adaptation rather than immediate visible performance. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The most important consequences may emerge through diffusion, compounding, second-order effects, or institutional adaptation rather than immediate visible performance."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Amara's Law", "one_liner": "The impact of a new technology or intervention is systematically overestimated over short horizons and underestimated over long ones, because forecasters project linearly from a salient early signal onto a non-linear, slowly compounding realization curve.", "page_ref": "prime:amaras_law", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Diffusion and compounding -> nonlinear long-run realization.", "slug": "amaras_law", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Slow compounding of complementary changes and second-order diffusion produces the exact long-horizon underestimate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Important consequences emerge through diffusion, compounding, second-order effects, or institutional adaptation rather than immediate performance.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Organizations must decide whether to invest, regulate, procure, build capability, communicate expectations, or preserve optionality before the long-run impact is observable.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: Organizations must decide whether to invest, regulate, procure, build capability, communicate expectations, or preserve optionality before the long-run impact is observable. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Organizations must decide whether to invest, regulate, procure, build capability, communicate expectations, or preserve optionality before the long-run impact is observable."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Organizations must decide whether to invest, regulate, procure, build capability, communicate expectations, or preserve optionality before the long-run impact is observable."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 33, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-033", "ledger_sha256": "306d432971a76585145053e22b7ba370b87226e64869a4b880eb0e6f38a4304b"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Horizon Scanning System", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:horizon_scanning_system", "slug": "horizon_scanning_system"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is late attention. The system's official metrics, routines, and incentives are tuned to current operations, but external change begins elsewhere: in weak signals, policy agendas, fringe practices, adjacent markets, field observations, technical communities, local experiments, or slow-moving contextual shifts.\n\nSeveral symptoms indicate this pattern:\n\n- leaders are surprised by changes that some people had already noticed informally;\n- reports circulate without changing decisions;\n- teams collect news but do not interpret it together;\n- early signals are dismissed as noise until they become expensive facts;\n- planning updates wait for annual cycles or crises;\n- the same familiar sources reproduce the same familiar blind spots.\n\nThe root tension is that the system needs to act in the present, but the future-relevant evidence is uncertain, external, and not yet operationally legible.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system reacts late because it lacks a repeatable way to notice, interpret, and route external changes while those changes are still emerging and uncertain."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact practice presupposes a strategic context where surprise is costly and preparation has value.", "role_mapping": "Material external condition -> strategically significant emerging issue.", "slug": "horizon_scanning", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b033_a02_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Good uses include public agencies watching demographic, climate, policy, and legitimacy shifts; product teams watching standards, user behavior, substitutes, and regulatory agendas; health systems watching field reports and adjacent geographies; and infrastructure owners watching climate, supply chains, insurance, material costs, and public funding conditions. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: External conditions can materially alter strategy, risk, legitimacy, resources, demand, or feasibility.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["External conditions can materially alter strategy, risk, legitimacy, resources, demand, or feasibility.", "Good uses include public agencies watching demographic, climate, policy, and legitimacy shifts; product teams watching standards, user behavior, substitutes, and regulatory agendas; health systems watching field reports and adjacent geographies; and infrastructure owners watching climate, supply chains, insurance, material costs, and public funding conditions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Horizon Scanning", "one_liner": "Monitor emerging trends.", "page_ref": "prime:horizon_scanning", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Material external condition -> strategically significant emerging issue.", "slug": "horizon_scanning", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact practice presupposes a strategic context where surprise is costly and preparation has value."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "External conditions can materially alter strategy, risk, legitimacy, resources, demand, or feasibility.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Continuous intake from diverse sources seeks pre-mainstream signals whose significance remains uncertain.", "role_mapping": "Scattered sources -> scan perimeter; weak signal -> emerging issue.", "slug": "horizon_scanning", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b033_a02_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when the environment changes faster than formal planning cycles, when signals are scattered across sources, or when multiple teams see fragments that never become shared strategic intelligence. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Signals of change appear in scattered, weak, or unfamiliar sources.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Signals of change appear in scattered, weak, or unfamiliar sources.", "It is especially useful when the environment changes faster than formal planning cycles, when signals are scattered across sources, or when multiple teams see fragments that never become shared strategic intelligence."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Horizon Scanning", "one_liner": "Monitor emerging trends.", "page_ref": "prime:horizon_scanning", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Scattered sources -> scan perimeter; weak signal -> emerging issue.", "slug": "horizon_scanning", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Continuous intake from diverse sources seeks pre-mainstream signals whose significance remains uncertain."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Signals of change appear in scattered, weak, or unfamiliar sources.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P060-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must identify a planning process and the environment for which it plans.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A recurring planning cycle addresses a target environment.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the direction in which planning cadence lags environmental tempo.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The planning cycle operates more slowly than the target environment changes.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Planning cycles are slower than the environment being planned for.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Planning cadence lags the rate of change in its target environment.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P060-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Horizon scanning can support a planning cycle that already matches environmental tempo.", "slug": "horizon_scanning"}], "residual_id": "r:horizon_scanning_system:b033_a02_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b033_a02_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when the environment changes faster than formal planning cycles, when signals are scattered across sources, or when multiple teams see fragments that never become shared strategic intelligence. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Planning cycles are slower than the environment being planned for.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Planning cycles are slower than the environment being planned for.", "It is especially useful when the environment changes faster than formal planning cycles, when signals are scattered across sources, or when multiple teams see fragments that never become shared strategic intelligence."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_GUARDED_EQUIVALENT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Without the guard the lagging loop may be operational picture-keeping rather than planning; with the roles identified, the exact rate inequality necessarily entails O2.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Situational-Awareness Collapse", "one_liner": "Locate a control failure under tempo in the picture-keeping pipeline rather than in missing data — a rate problem where perception, comprehension, or projection can no longer cycle fast enough to keep the decision-maker's model current.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:situational_awareness_collapse", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "picture_pipeline_is_planning_cycle", "predicate": "The picture-keeping pipeline is the recurring planning cycle for its target environment.", "rationale": "Independent exact-record review confirms a complete DNF branch and a publication-safe expression; any qualifier is one candidate-anchored atomic restriction."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "situational_awareness_collapse"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "picture_pipeline_is_planning_cycle"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "situational_awareness_collapse", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P060-C12-U1", "why_it_fits": "Situational-awareness collapse directly supplies the slower-cycle versus faster-environment inequality; one role restriction identifies the picture-keeping cycle as the recurring planning cycle."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Planning cycles are slower than the environment being planned for.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P060-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must include distributed partial observation across more than one system part.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Different system parts each observe fragments of a broader change.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require absence of synthesis across the distributed fragments.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "No actor or function combines the observed fragments.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Different parts of the system see fragments of change, but no one combines them.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Distributed observations of change remain unsynthesized.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P060-C13-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P060-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must include distributed partial observation across more than one system part.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Different system parts each observe fragments of a broader change.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require absence of forwarding or dissemination for the distributed fragments.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "No actor or function routes the observed fragments onward.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Different parts of the system see fragments of change, but no one routes them.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Distributed observations of change are not routed onward.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P060-C13-U2"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact capability includes triage and dissemination and therefore does not entail their absence.", "slug": "horizon_scanning"}], "residual_id": "r:horizon_scanning_system:b033_a02_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b033_a02_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Different parts of the system see fragments of change but no one combines or routes them. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Different parts of the system see fragments of change but no one combines or routes them."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PARTIALLY_DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "An individual-attention collapse defeats the unguarded expression but violates the selected distributed-observer branch; within that branch, lack of synthesis is explicit.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Situational-Awareness Collapse", "one_liner": "Locate a control failure under tempo in the picture-keeping pipeline rather than in missing data — a rate problem where perception, comprehension, or projection can no longer cycle fast enough to keep the decision-maker's model current.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:situational_awareness_collapse", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "collapse_spans_distributed_partial_observers", "predicate": "The collapse instance spans multiple system parts that each hold only a partial observation of the broader change.", "rationale": "Independent exact-record review confirms a complete DNF branch and a publication-safe expression; any qualifier is one candidate-anchored atomic restriction."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "situational_awareness_collapse"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "collapse_spans_distributed_partial_observers"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "situational_awareness_collapse", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P060-C13-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record expressly includes the multi-agent failed-fusion branch in which each observer sees only part and none holds the whole. One branch-selection guard chooses that named manifestation."}], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 2, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 1, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact capability includes triage and dissemination and therefore does not entail their absence.", "slug": "horizon_scanning"}], "normalized_requirement": "System parts see fragments of change but no one combines or routes them.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "PARTIAL_EXISTING_DSA_GROUNDING", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation grounded 1 of 2 eligible atomic units; the remaining unit or units stayed open."}, "predicate": "System parts see fragments of change but no one combines or routes them.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The system needs action without enough certainty for a forecast.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: The system needs action without enough certainty for a forecast. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The system needs action without enough certainty for a forecast."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The system needs action without enough certainty for a forecast."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 33, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-033", "ledger_sha256": "306d432971a76585145053e22b7ba370b87226e64869a4b880eb0e6f38a4304b"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Hub-and-Spoke Coordination", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:hub_and_spoke_coordination", "slug": "hub_and_spoke_coordination"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is not just that there are “many people” or “many systems.” The problem is that every additional participant multiplies the number of possible relationships, updates, negotiations, and inconsistencies. What begins as flexible direct coordination becomes a dense network of informal edges.\n\nCommon signs include duplicated negotiations, conflicting records, uneven access, long search times, misrouted requests, and dependency on personal networks. New participants struggle because they must discover many local conventions before they can participate.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Many nodes need coordination, exchange, discovery, or alignment, but direct many-to-many interaction creates excessive edge count, inconsistent information, duplicated negotiation, unmanaged conflict, or high search cost."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P060-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve many-to-many cardinality on both sides of the relation.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Many focal actors each face many potential counterpart actors.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require actor-to-actor discovery rather than merely permit or facilitate it.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Each focal actor must find relevant counterpart actors.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "Many actors must find many other actors.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Many actors each require discovery of many counterpart actors.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P060-C14-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P060-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve many-to-many cardinality on both sides of the relation.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Many focal actors each face many potential counterpart actors.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require bilateral bargaining or agreement-making across the many-to-many network.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Each focal actor must negotiate with relevant counterpart actors.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "Many actors must negotiate with many other actors.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Many actors each require negotiation with many counterpart actors.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P060-C14-U2"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P060-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve many-to-many cardinality on both sides of the relation.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Many focal actors each face many potential counterpart actors.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require propagation or maintenance of current information across the many-to-many network.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Each focal actor must update relevant counterpart actors.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "Many actors must update many other actors.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Many actors each require information updates to many counterpart actors.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P060-C14-U3"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Coordination can involve two actors or a pre-established common plan without many-to-many discovery.", "slug": "coordination"}], "residual_id": "r:hub_and_spoke_coordination:b033_a03_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b033_a03_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The structural problem is not just that there are “many people” or “many systems.” The problem is that every additional participant multiplies the number of possible relationships, updates, negotiations, and inconsistencies. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Many actors must find, negotiate with, or update many other actors.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Many actors must find, negotiate with, or update many other actors.", "The structural problem is not just that there are “many people” or “many systems.” The problem is that every additional participant multiplies the number of possible relationships, updates, negotiations, and inconsistencies."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 3, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 3}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Coordination can involve two actors or a pre-established common plan without many-to-many discovery.", "slug": "coordination"}], "normalized_requirement": "Many actors must find, negotiate with, or update many other actors.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 3 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Many actors must find, negotiate with, or update many other actors.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P060-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require content carried across separate pairwise links.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The system contains multiple pairwise connections.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail divergence across links rather than variation within one isolated connection.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The content differs incompatibly across those connections.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must cover information that differs across pairwise links.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The divergent content can be information.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must cover standards that differ across pairwise links.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The divergent content can be standards.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Information or standards diverge across pairwise connections.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Coordination content becomes inconsistent across pairwise connections.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P060-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Coordinated actors can share one stable information standard.", "slug": "coordination"}], "residual_id": "r:hub_and_spoke_coordination:b033_a03_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b033_a03_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Information or standards diverge across pairwise connections. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Information or standards diverge across pairwise connections."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "If the multiple binding directives did not differ incompatibly, the divergence trigger required for a realized unity-of-command breakdown would be absent.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Unity-of-Command Breakdown", "one_liner": "The command-and-control failure in which one subordinate node in the authority graph carries two or more binding in-edges for the same task at the same time, so that when the supervisors' orders diverge the actor cannot comply with both.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:unity_of_command_breakdown", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "unity_of_command_breakdown"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "unity_of_command_breakdown", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P060-C15-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every realized unity-of-command breakdown contains multiple pairwise authority edges whose binding directive content differs incompatibly, directly satisfying the information DNF branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "If connected replicas did not acquire incompatible information histories, the system would have a partition or failover event but not the split-brain failure defined by the exact record.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Split-Brain Problem", "one_liner": "The distributed-systems failure where a network partition splits a replicated cluster into subsets that each elect themselves as write authority and accept divergent writes; guard against it by enforcing that at most one subset — the quorum majority — may write.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:split_brain_problem", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "split_brain_problem"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "split_brain_problem", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P060-C15-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every split-brain instance contains multiple pairwise replication relationships and incompatible state histories after simultaneous writes, directly satisfying the information DNF branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "If all version requirements across dependency edges were jointly compatible, a satisfying assignment would exist and the exact dependency-hell pathology would be absent.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Dependency Hell", "one_liner": "The pathological state where a project's transitive dependency closure holds mutually incompatible version constraints, turning installation into an NP-complete constraint-satisfaction problem that no edge-level patch can resolve.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:dependency_hell", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "dependency_hell"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "dependency_hell", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P060-C15-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every dependency-hell instance contains multiple dependency edges carrying mutually incompatible version requirements, which are pairwise coordination standards, directly satisfying the standards DNF branch."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Information or standards diverge across pairwise connections.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P061-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"], ["O1", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must concern route selection or forwarding decisions made over bilateral relations.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Routing decisions are made bilaterally between actor pairs.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail degradation in routing-decision speed.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The bilateral routing decisions become slow.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail loss of consistency across routing decisions.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The bilateral routing decisions become inconsistent.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Bilateral routing decisions become slow or inconsistent.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Bilateral routing decisions degrade in speed or consistency.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P061-C01-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P061-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"], ["O1", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must concern counterpart or resource matching decisions made over bilateral relations.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Matching decisions are made bilaterally between actor pairs.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail degradation in matching-decision speed.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The bilateral matching decisions become slow.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail loss of consistency across matching decisions.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The bilateral matching decisions become inconsistent.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Bilateral matching decisions become slow or inconsistent.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Bilateral matching decisions degrade in speed or consistency.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P061-C01-U2"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Coordination can be fast, centralized, and consistent.", "slug": "coordination"}], "residual_id": "r:hub_and_spoke_coordination:b033_a03_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b033_a03_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Bilateral routing or matching decisions become slow or inconsistent. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Bilateral routing or matching decisions become slow or inconsistent."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 2, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 2}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Coordination can be fast, centralized, and consistent.", "slug": "coordination"}], "normalized_requirement": "Bilateral routing or matching decisions become slow or inconsistent.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 2 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Bilateral routing or matching decisions become slow or inconsistent.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact pattern has individually improving route choices that worsen aggregate network performance.", "role_mapping": "Local optimization -> selfish route choice; system loss -> increased aggregate travel cost.", "slug": "braess_paradox", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b033_a03_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Local optimization undermines system-level coherence. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Local optimization undermines system-level coherence."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Braess's Paradox", "one_liner": "Adding capacity to a network of self-optimizing users can shift the equilibrium and make aggregate performance worse.", "page_ref": "prime:braess_paradox", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Local optimization -> selfish route choice; system loss -> increased aggregate travel cost.", "slug": "braess_paradox", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact pattern has individually improving route choices that worsen aggregate network performance."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Local route optimization undermines system-level performance or coherence.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 33, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-033", "ledger_sha256": "306d432971a76585145053e22b7ba370b87226e64869a4b880eb0e6f38a4304b"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Human-Capacity Accommodation Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:human_capacity_accommodation_design", "slug": "human_capacity_accommodation_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 5, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 2, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 2, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 2 of 5 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Systems encode an imagined standard user and misclassify predictable mismatch as low motivation or inability. Fixed modality, pace, posture, language, location, or disclosure requirements exclude capable people, create error and injury, and transfer effort to users and support networks.\n\n### Diagnose demand before prescribing support\n\nA mature diagnosis separates at least five layers. The **essential outcome** is the result that must be achieved. The **task method** is the current sequence used to reach it. The **demand profile** describes what that sequence asks of perception, movement, memory, attention, language, endurance, emotional regulation, and time. The **capacity envelope** describes what a person or population can reliably supply under relevant conditions. The **consequence map** records what happens when demand exceeds capacity: error, pain, abandonment, unsafe work, delayed service, stigma, disclosure, or transferred labor.\n\nDemand is multidimensional and cumulative. A form may be readable but still inaccessible because it times out; a workstation may be reachable but not sustainable for a full shift; a meeting may provide captions but combine rapid turn-taking, ambiguous agendas, sensory load, and no recovery interval. Profile peak demand, sustained demand, switching cost, simultaneous demand, and recovery debt—not merely whether each isolated action is possible once.\n\nCapacity is likewise a range rather than a fixed score. It changes with fatigue, medication, pain, stress, environmental noise, acute illness, sleep, competing caregiving, unfamiliarity, and prior effort. Design against the reliable operating envelope and relevant worst-reasonable conditions, while keeping enough adjustability for individual strategy. Designing to a population average systematically hides tails, intersections, and fluctuation.\n\nEvidence must include absent and unsuccessful users. Completion data describe survivors. Workarounds, abandoned attempts, requests routed elsewhere, family assistance, staff rescue, injury reports, and nonparticipation often reveal the actual mismatch. The diagnostic question is not only “Can a person complete this?” but “At what effort, risk, delay, dependency, and probability of recovery?”", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A task or environment requires sensory, motor, cognitive, linguistic, temporal, emotional, or physiological capacities that users do not consistently have. The system hides this mismatch by selecting only successful users, relying on workarounds, demanding disclosure, or shifting effort to families and support staff."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P061-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must identify both a task and the outcome that is essential rather than incidental.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A person faces a task with an essential outcome.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve actual capability through an alternative method, not merely hope that one may exist.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The person can achieve the essential outcome through another method.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must connect the selected failure, avoidance, or abandonment outcome to retained capability through another method as a contrastive mismatch.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The branch-specific adverse task outcome occurs despite that alternative capability.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail task failure.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The adverse task outcome can take the form of failing the task.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail task avoidance.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The adverse task outcome can take the form of avoiding the task.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail abandonment after engagement with the task.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The adverse task outcome can take the form of abandoning the task.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "People fail, avoid, or abandon a task despite being able to achieve its essential outcome through another method.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "People fail, avoid, or abandon a task despite being capable of achieving its essential outcome by another method.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P061-C02-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Accommodation can improve an already-completable task without prior failure or abandonment.", "slug": "human_centered_accommodation"}], "residual_id": "r:human_capacity_accommodation_design:b033_a04_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b033_a04_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: People fail, avoid, or abandon a task despite being able to achieve its essential outcome through another method. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["People fail, avoid, or abandon a task despite being able to achieve its essential outcome through another method."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A complete instance cannot preserve the permitted novel affordance, representational pre-emption, and resulting solver blockage while denying capable failure on the task.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Functional Fixedness", "one_liner": "The cognitive bias in which encoding an object under its conventional category label crowds out inspection of its raw physical properties, blocking the solver from a non-conventional use the problem needs and the object's properties would permit.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:functional_fixedness", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "functional_fixedness"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "functional_fixedness", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P061-C02-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires a capable solver, an objectively usable non-conventional method, and failure caused by suppressed access to that method; this directly satisfies the failure branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A complete instance cannot retain a capable solver, reachable alternative, representational foreclosure, and avoidable failure while falsifying the selected failure branch.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Problem-Solving Fixation", "one_liner": "A familiar representation of a problem, method, or object becomes the first and dominant retrieval path, suppressing alternatives that the solver could otherwise use and producing an avoidable failure that can be relieved by disrupting the representation rather than adding knowledge.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:problem_solving_fixation", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "problem_solving_fixation"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "problem_solving_fixation", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P061-C02-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record expressly requires capability, an available alternative outside the familiar representation, and an avoidable failure when that alternative is suppressed."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "People fail or abandon a task although another method can achieve its essential outcome.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P061-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"], ["O1", "O3"], ["O1", "O4"], ["O1", "O5"], ["O1", "O6"], ["O1", "O7"], ["O1", "O8"], ["O1", "O9"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail a reduction in performance, not merely a change in how performance is achieved.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Performance is degraded relative to performance without the constraint.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must link performance degradation to fatigue.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Fatigue can be the condition under which performance degrades.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must link performance degradation to stress.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Stress can be the condition under which performance degrades.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must link performance degradation to interruption.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Interruption can be the condition under which performance degrades.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must link performance degradation to disability.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Disability can be the condition under which performance degrades.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must link performance degradation to a language constraint.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "Language can be the condition under which performance degrades.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must link performance degradation to aging.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "Aging can be the condition under which performance degrades.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must link performance degradation to illness.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "Illness can be the condition under which performance degrades.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must link performance degradation to a temporary capacity constraint.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "A temporary constraint can be the condition under which performance degrades.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Performance degrades under fatigue, stress, interruption, disability, language, aging, illness, or temporary constraint.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Performance degrades under a human capacity constraint.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P061-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The positive design process can be conducted prospectively before observed degradation.", "slug": "human_centered_accommodation"}], "residual_id": "r:human_capacity_accommodation_design:b033_a04_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b033_a04_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It changes with fatigue, medication, pain, stress, environmental noise, acute illness, sleep, competing caregiving, unfamiliarity, and prior effort. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Performance degrades under fatigue, stress, interruption, disability, language, aging, illness, or temporary constraint.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Performance degrades under fatigue, stress, interruption, disability, language, aging, illness, or temporary constraint.", "It changes with fatigue, medication, pain, stress, environmental noise, acute illness, sleep, competing caregiving, unfamiliarity, and prior effort."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A complete alarm-fatigue instance cannot retain progressive desensitisation and degraded alarm response while preserving unconstrained baseline performance.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Alarm Fatigue", "one_liner": "Reframe an operator's habitual silencing of clinical alarms as the rational response to a warning channel whose predictive value has collapsed, relocating the fix from the operator's discipline to the channel's specificity.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:alarm_fatigue", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "alarm_fatigue"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "alarm_fatigue", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P061-C03-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every complete exact-record instance includes actual degradation of alarm-response performance produced by the fatigue state generated by an overloaded low-specificity channel."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A complete instance cannot preserve stereotype-relevant threat, resource-consuming anxiety, and the required performance decrement while falsifying stress-conditioned degradation.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Stereotype Threat", "one_liner": "The situational performance drop that occurs when a negative group stereotype is made salient in an evaluative setting, consuming the working-memory capacity the task itself requires.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:stereotype_threat", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "stereotype_threat"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "stereotype_threat", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P061-C03-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record makes a situational stress response consume working memory and degrade evaluated-task performance below latent capability."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A complete instance cannot retain the trained dismiss reflex and informationally inert confirmation channel while denying degradation from the fatigue condition.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Confirmation Fatigue", "one_liner": "The interaction-design failure where a blocking confirmation prompt fires so often, and so rarely marks a truly consequential choice, that users develop an automatic dismiss reflex that discharges the prompt without reading it — leaving it syntactically present but informationally inert.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:confirmation_fatigue", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "confirmation_fatigue"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "confirmation_fatigue", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P061-C03-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires confirmation fatigue to degrade attentive prompt handling into reflexive dismissal, directly satisfying the fatigue branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A complete instance cannot preserve the category-induced retrieval block and resulting failure while denying degradation relative to the same solver after neutral redescription.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Functional Fixedness", "one_liner": "The cognitive bias in which encoding an object under its conventional category label crowds out inspection of its raw physical properties, blocking the solver from a non-conventional use the problem needs and the object's properties would permit.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:functional_fixedness", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "functional_fixedness"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "functional_fixedness", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P061-C03-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record defines a reversible, presentation-sensitive cognitive constraint that causes performance failure despite preserved underlying ability."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A complete instance cannot preserve involuntary capture, displacement of the primary task, and its latency, accuracy, or completion decrement while falsifying interruption-linked degradation.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Distraction", "one_liner": "The involuntary capture of an agent's scarce attention by a salient secondary stimulus that wins a bottleneck competition against the primary task by its own salience rather than the agent's intent, imposing a performance cost plus recovery time.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:distraction", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "distraction"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "distraction", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P061-C03-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires an interrupting secondary stimulus to capture attention and impose an actual performance decrement plus recovery cost on the primary task."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A complete instance cannot preserve the rate inequality and loss of a decision-usable current picture while denying capacity-conditioned performance degradation.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Situational-Awareness Collapse", "one_liner": "Locate a control failure under tempo in the picture-keeping pipeline rather than in missing data — a rate problem where perception, comprehension, or projection can no longer cycle fast enough to keep the decision-maker's model current.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:situational_awareness_collapse", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "situational_awareness_collapse"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "situational_awareness_collapse", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P061-C03-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires actual picture-keeping failure during a decision-relevant window because environmental tempo outruns the actor or team's processing bandwidth."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_SYNTHESIS", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Without branch selection, belief distortion can instantiate identity threat without degraded task performance; with the named task-performance branch selected, the exact downstream cost and temporary constraint satisfy the unit.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Identity Threat", "one_liner": "The anticipated devaluation of a positively-valued self-aspect when a situational cue makes it salient — activating a defensive response that competes with the very task or belief-revision the situation demands, and wins often enough to leave measurable costs.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:identity_threat", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "identity_threat_cost_is_task_performance", "predicate": "The identity-threat response produces the candidate's named task-performance degradation branch.", "rationale": "Publication-safe retained expression: the exact record plus the single candidate-anchored qualifier necessarily satisfies one complete DNF branch."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "identity_threat"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The identity-threat response produces the candidate's named task-performance degradation branch."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "identity_threat", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P061-C03-U1", "why_it_fits": "Identity threat directly supplies a situational capacity constraint, while one exact-record-anchored branch selection makes its downstream cost task-performance degradation rather than belief distortion."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Performance degrades under fatigue, stress, interruption, disability, language, aging, illness, or temporary constraint.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P061-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O9"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail compulsion to use a specified choice, not merely a default or recommendation.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "One specified choice is mandatory for participation or task performance.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require absence of necessity for imposing the specified choice.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The mandatory restriction is not necessary for the essential outcome.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must apply the unnecessary mandate to a modality.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The mandatory choice can concern modality.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must apply the unnecessary mandate to posture.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The mandatory choice can concern posture.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must apply the unnecessary mandate to pace.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The mandatory choice can concern pace.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must apply the unnecessary mandate to location.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The mandatory choice can concern location.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must apply the unnecessary mandate to schedule.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The mandatory choice can concern schedule.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must apply the unnecessary mandate to a device.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The mandatory choice can concern device.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must apply the unnecessary mandate to a communication channel.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "The mandatory choice can concern communication channel.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "One modality, posture, pace, location, schedule, device, or communication channel is mandatory without necessity.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A single method or access choice is mandated without being necessary.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P061-C04-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An accommodated system may already offer multiple necessary and optional modes.", "slug": "human_centered_accommodation"}], "residual_id": "r:human_capacity_accommodation_design:b033_a04_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b033_a04_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: One modality, posture, pace, location, schedule, device, or communication channel is mandatory without necessity. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["One modality, posture, pace, location, schedule, device, or communication channel is mandatory without necessity."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An accommodated system may already offer multiple necessary and optional modes.", "slug": "human_centered_accommodation"}], "normalized_requirement": "One modality, posture, pace, location, schedule, device, or channel is mandatory without necessity.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "One modality, posture, pace, location, schedule, device, or channel is mandatory without necessity.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Accommodation may address speed or well-being without predictable errors or a disputed motivation attribution.", "slug": "human_centered_accommodation"}], "residual_id": "r:human_capacity_accommodation_design:b033_a04_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b033_a04_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "These signals point to a capacity-demand relation rather than a simple knowledge gap. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Errors are predictable consequences of demand, interface, or environment rather than lack of motivation.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Errors are predictable consequences of demand, interface, or environment rather than lack of motivation.", "These signals point to a capacity-demand relation rather than a simple knowledge gap."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Accommodation may address speed or well-being without predictable errors or a disputed motivation attribution.", "slug": "human_centered_accommodation"}], "normalized_requirement": "Errors are predictable consequences of demand, interface, or environment rather than lack of motivation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Errors are predictable consequences of demand, interface, or environment rather than lack of motivation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B5", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P061-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must identify support that actually exists outside a formal support structure.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Support exists through informal rather than formal arrangements.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail adverse status or social judgment attached to use or receipt of the support.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The informal support is socially stigmatized.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Support exists informally but is stigmatized.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Existing informal support carries stigma.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P061-C05-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P061-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must identify support that actually exists outside a formal support structure.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Support exists through informal rather than formal arrangements.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail deficient dependability or availability of the informal support.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The informal support cannot be relied on consistently when needed.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "Support exists informally but is unreliable.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Existing informal support cannot be depended on reliably.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P061-C05-U2"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P061-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must identify support that actually exists outside a formal support structure.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Support exists through informal rather than formal arrangements.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail omission of the existing informal support from capacity planning.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Capacity planning does not represent or account for that support.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Support exists informally but is invisible in capacity planning.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Capacity planning omits existing informal support.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P061-C05-U3"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Formal accommodation can be reliable, visible, and unstigmatized.", "slug": "human_centered_accommodation"}], "residual_id": "r:human_capacity_accommodation_design:b033_a04_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b033_a04_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Support exists informally but is stigmatized, unreliable, or invisible in capacity planning. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Support exists informally but is stigmatized, unreliable, or invisible in capacity planning."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 3, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 3}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Formal accommodation can be reliable, visible, and unstigmatized.", "slug": "human_centered_accommodation"}], "normalized_requirement": "Informal support is stigmatized, unreliable, or invisible in capacity planning.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 3 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Informal support is stigmatized, unreliable, or invisible in capacity planning.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 5", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "DISJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 33, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-033", "ledger_sha256": "306d432971a76585145053e22b7ba370b87226e64869a4b880eb0e6f38a4304b"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Hypothesis Test Power Calibration", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:hypothesis_test_power_calibration", "slug": "hypothesis_test_power_calibration"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "An empirical decision depends on a hypothesis test, but the planned data collection, measurement precision, or thresholding scheme may be too weak to distinguish a meaningful true effect from noise.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "An empirical decision depends on a hypothesis test, but the planned data collection, measurement precision, or thresholding scheme may be too weak to distinguish a meaningful true effect from noise."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Legitimate power analysis requires a pre-specified test and supports prospective design rather than observed post-hoc power.", "role_mapping": "Pre-data design -> pre-specified testing framework.", "slug": "statistical_power", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b033_a05_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A study, experiment, monitoring plan, or test is being designed before data collection or before a major decision gate. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A study, experiment, monitoring plan, or test is being designed before data collection or before a major decision gate."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Statistical Power", "one_liner": "Probability of detecting effect.", "page_ref": "prime:statistical_power", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Pre-data design -> pre-specified testing framework.", "slug": "statistical_power", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Legitimate power analysis requires a pre-specified test and supports prospective design rather than observed post-hoc power."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A study, monitoring plan, or test is designed before data collection or a major decision gate.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Power must be computed at a specified alternative effect size, ideally the minimum practically meaningful effect.", "role_mapping": "Meaningful effect -> alternative value delta.", "slug": "statistical_power", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b033_a05_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Decision-makers can state a minimum effect size, exceedance, improvement, degradation, or difference that would matter in practice. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Decision-makers can state a minimum effect size, exceedance, improvement, degradation, or difference that would matter in practice."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Statistical Power", "one_liner": "Probability of detecting effect.", "page_ref": "prime:statistical_power", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Meaningful effect -> alternative value delta.", "slug": "statistical_power", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Power must be computed at a specified alternative effect size, ideally the minimum practically meaningful effect."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Decision-makers can state a minimum effect or difference that matters in practice.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P061-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must concern a null or non-significant result rather than a positive finding.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A study or test produces a null result.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail the would-be inference from a null result to absence of a meaningful effect without requiring that the interpretation has already occurred.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The null result would be treated as evidence that no meaningful effect exists.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve possible inadequate power and must not require that underpowering is already proven.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The design may instead be underpowered to detect a meaningful effect.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must connect possible low power and the prospective null interpretation as competing explanations.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Possible underpowering undercuts the would-be no-meaningful-effect interpretation.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "A null result would be treated as evidence of no meaningful effect even when the design may simply be underpowered.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A possibly underpowered null result would be interpreted as evidence that no meaningful effect exists.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P061-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Power analysis does not require a stakeholder who would misinterpret a null result.", "slug": "statistical_power"}], "residual_id": "r:hypothesis_test_power_calibration:b033_a05_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b033_a05_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A null result would otherwise be treated as evidence of no meaningful effect, even when the design may simply be underpowered. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A null result would otherwise be treated as evidence of no meaningful effect, even when the design may simply be underpowered."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Power analysis does not require a stakeholder who would misinterpret a null result.", "slug": "statistical_power"}], "normalized_requirement": "An underpowered null result would otherwise be treated as evidence of no meaningful effect.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "An underpowered null result would otherwise be treated as evidence of no meaningful effect.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "False negatives are consequential enough that low sensitivity would make a nominally rigorous test misleading.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The design must balance epistemic sensitivity against cost, ethics, time, operational burden, and error-rate discipline; maximizing detection probability without boundaries can waste resources or inflate false positives, while minimizing resources can produce false reassurance. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: False negatives are consequential enough that low sensitivity would make a nominally rigorous test misleading. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["False negatives are consequential enough that low sensitivity would make a nominally rigorous test misleading.", "The design must balance epistemic sensitivity against cost, ethics, time, operational burden, and error-rate discipline; maximizing detection probability without boundaries can waste resources or inflate false positives, while minimizing resources can produce false reassurance."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "False negatives are consequential enough that low sensitivity would make a nominally rigorous test misleading."}, {"display_text": "Sample size, measurement frequency, allocation ratio, follow-up duration, or signal-to-noise control can still be changed.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "An empirical decision depends on a hypothesis test, but the planned data collection, measurement precision, or thresholding scheme may be too weak to distinguish a meaningful true effect from noise. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: Sample size, measurement frequency, allocation ratio, follow-up duration, or signal-to-noise control can still be changed. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Sample size, measurement frequency, allocation ratio, follow-up duration, or signal-to-noise control can still be changed.", "An empirical decision depends on a hypothesis test, but the planned data collection, measurement precision, or thresholding scheme may be too weak to distinguish a meaningful true effect from noise."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Sample size, measurement frequency, allocation ratio, follow-up duration, or signal-to-noise control can still be changed."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 33, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-033", "ledger_sha256": "306d432971a76585145053e22b7ba370b87226e64869a4b880eb0e6f38a4304b"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Hypothesis Testing Frame", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:hypothesis_testing_frame", "slug": "hypothesis_testing_frame"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is not merely lack of data. It is the absence of a stable interpretation frame. A team sees evidence, then decides what it was testing. A reviewer accepts a claim because the result looks impressive, without saying what default was displaced. A non-detection is treated as proof of no effect even though the evidence may have been too weak to detect anything. A threshold is chosen because it supports a preferred conclusion.\n\nWithout the frame, claim evaluation becomes vulnerable to ambiguity, confirmation bias, burden shifting, threshold shopping, and overclaiming. The same evidence can be used to support incompatible conclusions because the claim, default, threshold, and error costs were never fixed.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A claim is assessed informally or after-the-fact, allowing ambiguous evidence thresholds, moving standards, one-sided interpretation, and confusion between evidence, action, causality, and practical importance."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact test maps evidence into a reject-versus-fail-to-reject decision over a null and alternative claim.", "role_mapping": "Claim decision -> hypothesis-test conclusion.", "slug": "hypothesis_testing_null_vs_alternative", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b033_a06_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A decision depends on whether a claim should be accepted, rejected, escalated, or left unresolved. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A decision depends on whether a claim should be accepted, rejected, escalated, or left unresolved."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Hypothesis Testing (Null vs. Alternative)", "one_liner": "Null vs alternative evaluation.", "page_ref": "prime:hypothesis_testing_null_vs_alternative", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Claim decision -> hypothesis-test conclusion.", "slug": "hypothesis_testing_null_vs_alternative", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact test maps evidence into a reject-versus-fail-to-reject decision over a null and alternative claim."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A decision depends on accepting, rejecting, escalating, or leaving a claim unresolved.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The test statistic is a sample function with a probability distribution under the null, so evidence is probabilistic rather than deductive.", "role_mapping": "Noisy evidence -> sampling distribution.", "slug": "hypothesis_testing_null_vs_alternative", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b033_a06_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The system needs to learn from evidence, but evidence can be interpreted opportunistically unless the claim, default, threshold, and error risks are fixed before interpretation. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Evidence is noisy, partial, probabilistic, contested, or open to multiple interpretations.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Evidence is noisy, partial, probabilistic, contested, or open to multiple interpretations.", "The system needs to learn from evidence, but evidence can be interpreted opportunistically unless the claim, default, threshold, and error risks are fixed before interpretation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Hypothesis Testing (Null vs. Alternative)", "one_liner": "Null vs alternative evaluation.", "page_ref": "prime:hypothesis_testing_null_vs_alternative", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Noisy evidence -> sampling distribution.", "slug": "hypothesis_testing_null_vs_alternative", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The test statistic is a sample function with a probability distribution under the null, so evidence is probabilistic rather than deductive."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Evidence is noisy, partial, probabilistic, contested, or open to multiple interpretations.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P061-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve capability to revise the threshold and must not require that revision always occurs.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An actor has the capability to move a decision threshold.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must place post-evidence timing within the revision capability and must not require an actual threshold movement.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The available threshold revision can occur after the actor observes the relevant evidence.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must connect the revisable threshold to the evidence it would govern while preserving capability rather than completed revision.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The threshold that the actor can move governs evaluation or classification of that evidence.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Actors can move decision thresholds after observing evidence.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An actor can revise a decision threshold after seeing the evidence it will classify.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P061-C07-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P061-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve capability for selective emphasis rather than require that selection always occurs.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An actor has the capability to choose which result to emphasize.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must include a conclusion favored independently of the result selection.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The actor has a preferred conclusion.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must make support for the preferred conclusion the available selection criterion without requiring that selective emphasis has occurred.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The actor can choose a result for emphasis because it supports the preferred conclusion.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Actors can emphasize whichever result supports their preferred conclusion.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An actor can selectively emphasize evidence that supports a preferred conclusion.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P061-C07-U2"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A properly pre-specified hypothesis test can hold thresholds fixed and avoid selective reporting.", "slug": "hypothesis_testing_null_vs_alternative"}], "residual_id": "r:hypothesis_testing_frame:b033_a06_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b033_a06_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Actors can move thresholds after observing evidence or emphasize whichever result supports their preferred conclusion. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Actors can move thresholds after observing evidence or emphasize whichever result supports their preferred conclusion."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 2, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 2}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A properly pre-specified hypothesis test can hold thresholds fixed and avoid selective reporting.", "slug": "hypothesis_testing_null_vs_alternative"}], "normalized_requirement": "Actors can move thresholds after seeing evidence or select the result supporting a preferred conclusion.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 2 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Actors can move thresholds after seeing evidence or select the result supporting a preferred conclusion.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The null is the default and the pre-specified alpha threshold creates an asymmetric burden for changing it.", "role_mapping": "Default presumption -> null; burden -> rejection region.", "slug": "hypothesis_testing_null_vs_alternative", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b033_a06_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A default presumption or incumbent state should not change without a clear evidentiary burden. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A default presumption or incumbent state should not change without a clear evidentiary burden."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Hypothesis Testing (Null vs. Alternative)", "one_liner": "Null vs alternative evaluation.", "page_ref": "prime:hypothesis_testing_null_vs_alternative", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Default presumption -> null; burden -> rejection region.", "slug": "hypothesis_testing_null_vs_alternative", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The null is the default and the pre-specified alpha threshold creates an asymmetric burden for changing it."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A default presumption should not change without a clear evidentiary burden.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "False positives and false negatives have materially different costs.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when a result could be interpreted opportunistically, when actors might move standards after seeing evidence, or when the two major mistakes—false acceptance and false rejection—carry different costs. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: False positives and false negatives have materially different costs. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["False positives and false negatives have materially different costs.", "It is especially useful when a result could be interpreted opportunistically, when actors might move standards after seeing evidence, or when the two major mistakes—false acceptance and false rejection—carry different costs."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "False positives and false negatives have materially different costs."}, {"display_text": "A result must be communicated with limits rather than converted into simplistic proof or disproof.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this deployment constraint: A result must be communicated with limits rather than converted into simplistic proof or disproof. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A result must be communicated with limits rather than converted into simplistic proof or disproof."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "A result must be communicated with limits rather than converted into simplistic proof or disproof."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 33, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-033", "ledger_sha256": "306d432971a76585145053e22b7ba370b87226e64869a4b880eb0e6f38a4304b"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Hysteresis Management", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:hysteresis_management", "slug": "hysteresis_management"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is path-dependent reversibility. The system has crossed into a different state, and the current state is shaped by the path that got it there. Removing the original input does not restore the prior system because the state itself changed capacity, trust, incentives, material condition, behavior, or expectations.\n\nThis often appears as one of three problems. First, the system toggles because entry and exit share a single threshold. Second, the system exits too early because temporary improvement is mistaken for stable recovery. Third, the system remains locked in because no one has designed a feasible exit path from the accumulated costs of the changed state.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system has crossed into a new state, mode, commitment, risk condition, or pattern, and the pathway back is not the reverse of the pathway in. Prior exposure, accumulated stress, sunk costs, learned behavior, infrastructure, trust loss, or coordination changes make exit slower, harder, riskier, or dependent on different evidence."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The same external parameter value can support different states depending on the prior trajectory.", "role_mapping": "Removed input -> return parameter path; different state -> path-dependent response.", "slug": "hysteresis", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b033_a07_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A system does not return to its prior state when the original input, pressure, or trigger is removed. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A system does not return to its prior state when the original input, pressure, or trigger is removed."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Hysteresis", "one_liner": "Path dependence.", "page_ref": "prime:hysteresis", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Removed input -> return parameter path; different state -> path-dependent response.", "slug": "hysteresis", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The same external parameter value can support different states depending on the prior trajectory."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Removing the original input, pressure, or trigger does not restore the prior state.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P061-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must identify a threshold for transition into the relevant state.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "One threshold governs entry into a state.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must identify a threshold for leaving the same state safely.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Another threshold governs safe exit from the same state.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require unequal thresholds rather than one common switching threshold.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The entry threshold and safe-exit threshold differ.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "The threshold for entering a state differs from the threshold for leaving it safely.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A state's entry threshold differs from its safe-exit threshold.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P061-C08-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A smooth hysteresis loop need not have discrete entry and exit thresholds.", "slug": "hysteresis"}], "residual_id": "r:hysteresis_management:b033_a07_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b033_a07_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The threshold for entering a state is different from the threshold for leaving it safely. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The threshold for entering a state is different from the threshold for leaving it safely."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A smooth hysteresis loop need not have discrete entry and exit thresholds.", "slug": "hysteresis"}], "normalized_requirement": "The threshold for entering a state differs from the threshold for leaving it safely.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The threshold for entering a state differs from the threshold for leaving it safely.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P061-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require recurrent switching or reversal.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The system switches repeatedly rather than only once.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must tie the oscillation to one common threshold rather than distinct entry and exit thresholds.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The repeated switching occurs around a single threshold.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must make the switching pattern responsible for the resulting failure.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The repeated single-threshold switching causes the adverse outcome.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail instability.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The resulting failure can be instability.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail rapid or recurrent chattering.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The resulting failure can be chattering.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail repeated policy reversal or whiplash.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The resulting failure can be policy whiplash.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail confusion in operations.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The resulting failure can be operational confusion.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Repeated switching around a single threshold creates instability, chattering, policy whiplash, or operational confusion.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Repeated switching around one threshold causes an oscillation-related failure.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P061-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A hysteresis band often prevents chattering by separating entry and exit paths.", "slug": "hysteresis"}], "residual_id": "r:hysteresis_management:b033_a07_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b033_a07_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Repeated switching around a single threshold creates instability, chattering, policy whiplash, or operational confusion. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Repeated switching around a single threshold creates instability, chattering, policy whiplash, or operational confusion."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A hysteresis band often prevents chattering by separating entry and exit paths.", "slug": "hysteresis"}], "normalized_requirement": "Repeated switching around one threshold creates chattering, whiplash, or instability.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Repeated switching around one threshold creates chattering, whiplash, or instability.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "An internal memory mechanism preserves trajectory history beyond the current external parameter.", "role_mapping": "Residual memory -> history-bearing internal state.", "slug": "hysteresis", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b033_a07_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A change creates residual memory: fatigue, debt, mistrust, dependency, habit, switching cost, or accumulated load. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A change creates residual memory: fatigue, debt, mistrust, dependency, habit, switching cost, or accumulated load."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Hysteresis", "one_liner": "Path dependence.", "page_ref": "prime:hysteresis", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Residual memory -> history-bearing internal state.", "slug": "hysteresis", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "An internal memory mechanism preserves trajectory history beyond the current external parameter."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Change leaves residual internal memory such as fatigue, debt, mistrust, dependency, habit, switching cost, or load.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P061-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require exit before the state can be left safely or sustainably.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Exit from the state occurs prematurely.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must make premature exit responsible for the later failure.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The premature exit causes a subsequent adverse outcome.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail relapse.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The adverse outcome can be relapse.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail reentry into the state or process.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The adverse outcome can be reentry.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail a secondary failure.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The adverse outcome can be secondary failure.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Premature exit causes relapse, reentry, or secondary failure.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Exiting a state prematurely causes a subsequent failure.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P061-C10-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P061-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require a reduction in response intensity before it is safe or sustainable.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "De-escalation occurs prematurely.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must make premature de-escalation responsible for the later failure.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The premature de-escalation causes a subsequent adverse outcome.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail relapse.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The adverse outcome can be relapse.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail reentry into the state or process.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The adverse outcome can be reentry.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail a secondary failure.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The adverse outcome can be secondary failure.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Premature de-escalation causes relapse, reentry, or secondary failure.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "De-escalating prematurely causes a subsequent failure.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P061-C10-U2"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P061-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require reversal before the change can be withdrawn safely or sustainably.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Rollback of a change occurs prematurely.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must make premature rollback responsible for the later failure.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The premature rollback causes a subsequent adverse outcome.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail relapse.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The adverse outcome can be relapse.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail reentry into the state or process.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The adverse outcome can be reentry.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail a secondary failure.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The adverse outcome can be secondary failure.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Premature rollback causes relapse, reentry, or secondary failure.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Rolling back a change prematurely causes a subsequent failure.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P061-C10-U3"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P061-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require removal of support before it is safe or sustainable.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Support is withdrawn prematurely.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must make premature support withdrawal responsible for the later failure.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The premature support withdrawal causes a subsequent adverse outcome.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail relapse.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The adverse outcome can be relapse.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail reentry into the state or process.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The adverse outcome can be reentry.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail a secondary failure.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The adverse outcome can be secondary failure.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Premature support withdrawal causes relapse, reentry, or secondary failure.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Withdrawing support prematurely causes a subsequent failure.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P061-C10-U4"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Hysteresis can persist without an intervention, premature withdrawal, or relapse event.", "slug": "hysteresis"}], "residual_id": "r:hysteresis_management:b033_a07_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b033_a07_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Premature exit, de-escalation, rollback, or support withdrawal causes relapse, reentry, or secondary failure. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Premature exit, de-escalation, rollback, or support withdrawal causes relapse, reentry, or secondary failure."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 4, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 4}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Hysteresis can persist without an intervention, premature withdrawal, or relapse event.", "slug": "hysteresis"}], "normalized_requirement": "Premature exit or support withdrawal causes relapse, reentry, or secondary failure.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 4 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Premature exit or support withdrawal causes relapse, reentry, or secondary failure.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Increasing and decreasing the control parameter trace different response branches, so reversing the input does not retrace the state path.", "role_mapping": "Recovery path -> alternate hysteresis branch.", "slug": "hysteresis", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b033_a07_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The desired transition requires a recovery path, not simply reversal of the original action. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The desired transition requires a recovery path, not simply reversal of the original action."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Hysteresis", "one_liner": "Path dependence.", "page_ref": "prime:hysteresis", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Recovery path -> alternate hysteresis branch.", "slug": "hysteresis", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Increasing and decreasing the control parameter trace different response branches, so reversing the input does not retrace the state path."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The desired transition requires a recovery path rather than simple reversal of the original action.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 33, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-033", "ledger_sha256": "306d432971a76585145053e22b7ba370b87226e64869a4b880eb0e6f38a4304b"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Iconographic Meaning System", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:iconographic_meaning_system", "slug": "iconographic_meaning_system"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is unstable signification: the visual mark and the intended meaning are not reliably connected. Symbols may be inconsistent, overloaded, culturally ambiguous, visually confusable, inaccessible, or disconnected from the action they are meant to support.\n\nThe most common failure is assuming that symbols are self-explanatory. They rarely are. A symbol becomes readable through resemblance, learned convention, placement, repetition, cultural association, labels, legends, standards, and feedback. When those supports are missing, people guess.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Symbols are inconsistent, culturally ambiguous, visually confusable, or disconnected from the meanings they are meant to communicate, so people misread identity, status, risk, action, location, value, or category."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact system is a shared repertoire of conventional visual forms and codified meaning relations across contexts.", "role_mapping": "Multiple symbols -> repertoire; related meanings -> conventional association system.", "slug": "iconography", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b033_a08_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Multiple symbols or visual signs must communicate related meanings across surfaces, languages, audiences, or teams. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Multiple symbols or visual signs must communicate related meanings across surfaces, languages, audiences, or teams."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Iconography", "one_liner": "Symbol systems in art.", "page_ref": "prime:iconography", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Multiple symbols -> repertoire; related meanings -> conventional association system.", "slug": "iconography", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact system is a shared repertoire of conventional visual forms and codified meaning relations across contexts."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Multiple visual symbols communicate related meanings across surfaces, languages, audiences, or teams.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Conventional visual forms compress complex meanings into instantly legible forms for rapid recognition.", "role_mapping": "Rapid recognition -> iconographic literacy.", "slug": "iconography", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b033_a08_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: People need to recognize meanings quickly without reading long explanations every time. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["People need to recognize meanings quickly without reading long explanations every time."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Iconography", "one_liner": "Symbol systems in art.", "page_ref": "prime:iconography", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Rapid recognition -> iconographic literacy.", "slug": "iconography", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Conventional visual forms compress complex meanings into instantly legible forms for rapid recognition."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "People need to recognize the meanings quickly without repeated long explanations.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P061-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve apparent or visual stylistic coherence among existing symbols.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The existing symbols appear stylistically coherent.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require absence of stable semantic rules, not merely some ambiguity in one symbol.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The symbol system lacks stable rules assigning or constraining meaning.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must connect coherent style and unstable meaning as contrasting properties of the same symbol system.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Stylistic coherence coexists with the semantic-rule deficit.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Existing symbols look stylistically coherent but lack stable meaning rules.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A stylistically coherent symbol system lacks stable rules connecting symbols to meanings.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P061-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Iconography requires culturally established meanings and codified combination rules; their absence is inverse.", "slug": "iconography"}], "residual_id": "r:iconographic_meaning_system:b033_a08_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b033_a08_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Existing symbols look stylistically coherent but lack stable meaning rules. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Existing symbols look stylistically coherent but lack stable meaning rules."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Iconography requires culturally established meanings and codified combination rules; their absence is inverse.", "slug": "iconography"}], "normalized_requirement": "Existing symbols are stylistically coherent but lack stable meaning rules.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Existing symbols are stylistically coherent but lack stable meaning rules.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P061-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail a semantic association conveyed by the symbol.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A symbol carries or communicates a meaning.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the mismatch between conveyed meaning and intended meaning.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The conveyed meaning is unintended by the symbol's designer or adopter.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail an unintended cultural meaning.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The unintended meaning can be cultural.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail an unintended political meaning.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The unintended meaning can be political.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail an unintended religious meaning.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The unintended meaning can be religious.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail an unintended status meaning.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The unintended meaning can concern status.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail an unintended safety meaning.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The unintended meaning can concern safety.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail an unintended exclusionary meaning.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The unintended meaning can be exclusionary.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "A symbol carries unintended cultural, political, religious, status, safety, or exclusionary meaning.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A symbol communicates an unintended meaning in a cultural, political, religious, status, safety, or exclusionary domain.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P061-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An iconographic symbol can communicate only its intended established meaning in its interpreter community.", "slug": "iconography"}], "residual_id": "r:iconographic_meaning_system:b033_a08_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b033_a08_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is also a weak fit when the meaning is too nuanced or sensitive to compress responsibly into a symbol without explanation. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A symbol carries unintended cultural, political, religious, status, safety, or exclusionary meaning.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A symbol carries unintended cultural, political, religious, status, safety, or exclusionary meaning.", "It is also a weak fit when the meaning is too nuanced or sensitive to compress responsibly into a symbol without explanation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "With the guard that the divergent prior is cultural, a complete instance still must contain a designer-intended meaning and a user's different decompression; no guarded counterexample preserves both while denying a cultural unintended meaning.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Microcopy Ambiguity", "one_liner": "The HCI failure where a terse interface label admits more than one reading, so the user decompresses it against a prior different from the designer's and acts correctly on the wrong interpretation.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:microcopy_ambiguity", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O3"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "divergent_prior_is_cultural", "predicate": "the user's divergent prior is cultural", "rationale": "Publication-safe retained expression: the exact record plus the single candidate-anchored qualifier necessarily satisfies one complete DNF branch."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "microcopy_ambiguity"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "the user's divergent prior is cultural"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "microcopy_ambiguity", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P061-C12-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record directly entails an unintended received meaning from an ambiguous symbol; one candidate-anchored domain restriction selects its explicitly named cultural-prior manifestation."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Once the receiver reads an actual parody as a sincere political-extremist statement, the message necessarily conveys a political meaning contrary to the parodist's intent; removing any part breaks the guard.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Poe's Law", "one_liner": "Without an explicit marker of intent, a faithful parody of an extreme position becomes indistinguishable from a sincere expression of it, because sincere and parodic content overlap completely once the channel strips tone, context, and the sender's known standing.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:poes_law", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2", "O4"], "guard_type": "MODALITY_ACTUALIZATION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "receiver_reads_parody_as_sincere_political_statement", "predicate": "The receiver interprets the parody as a sincere political-extremist statement.", "rationale": "Publication-safe retained expression: the exact record plus the single candidate-anchored qualifier necessarily satisfies one complete DNF branch."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "poes_law"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The receiver interprets the parody as a sincere political-extremist statement."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "poes_law", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P061-C12-U1", "why_it_fits": "Poe's Law supplies the intent-ambiguous message surface, and one atomic, exact-record-anchored receiver interpretation actualizes both unintendedness and the political branch."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A symbol carries unintended cultural, political, religious, status, safety, or exclusionary meaning.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P061-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must concern an active inflow of new symbols rather than only a fixed legacy set.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "New symbols are being added on an ongoing basis.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must identify the system's capability to preserve consistency as the comparison baseline.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The system has a bounded capacity to maintain consistency among symbols.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the direction in which incoming symbols outpace consistency maintenance.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The symbol-addition rate exceeds that consistency-maintenance capacity.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "New symbols are being added faster than the system can maintain consistency.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Symbol-addition rate exceeds the system's consistency-maintenance capacity.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P061-C13-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An iconographic repertoire can remain stable and consistently governed.", "slug": "iconography"}], "residual_id": "r:iconographic_meaning_system:b033_a08_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b033_a08_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: New symbols are being added faster than the system can maintain consistency. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["New symbols are being added faster than the system can maintain consistency."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An iconographic repertoire can remain stable and consistently governed.", "slug": "iconography"}], "normalized_requirement": "New symbols are added faster than consistency can be maintained.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "New symbols are added faster than consistency can be maintained.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 33, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-033", "ledger_sha256": "306d432971a76585145053e22b7ba370b87226e64869a4b880eb0e6f38a4304b"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Idempotent Operation Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:idempotent_operation_design", "slug": "idempotent_operation_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a mismatch between reliability and side effects. Reliability often demands retry: if an attempt times out, loses acknowledgment, or fails midway, the sensible response is to try again. But if every attempt is treated as a new command, retry can multiply consequences. A user trying to recover from uncertainty may accidentally create duplicate charges, duplicate shipments, duplicate records, duplicate notifications, duplicate permissions, or conflicting case statuses.\n\nThe problem becomes sharper when completion is partly observable. The actor knows they attempted the operation but does not know whether the system accepted it. The system may know the state but not know whether a later request is a duplicate or a new intent. Downstream systems may receive repeated messages without knowing which ones have already been handled. Without a repeat-safety structure, each participant guesses.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "An operation can be triggered, retried, duplicated, or replayed more than once while the actor or system cannot reliably know whether the first attempt succeeded. Without repeat-safety design, each additional attempt may create an extra effect, corrupt state, or trigger external consequences."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P061-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must distinguish the invoking caller from the operation and its completion state.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A caller invokes an operation that has a completion state.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail deficient reliability of completion observation from the caller's perspective.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The caller cannot observe that completion state reliably.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "The caller cannot reliably observe operation completion.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An operation's caller cannot reliably determine whether the operation completed.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P061-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Idempotence can be a mathematical property used where completion is fully observable.", "slug": "idempotence"}], "residual_id": "r:idempotent_operation_design:b033_a09_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b033_a09_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The caller cannot observe completion reliably. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The caller cannot observe completion reliably."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Idempotence can be a mathematical property used where completion is fully observable.", "slug": "idempotence"}], "normalized_requirement": "The caller cannot reliably observe operation completion.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The caller cannot reliably observe operation completion.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An idempotent operation can be invoked exactly once in practice.", "slug": "idempotence"}], "residual_id": "r:idempotent_operation_design:b033_a09_c2", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b033_a09_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The system may know the state but not know whether a later request is a duplicate or a new intent. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Duplicate requests or submissions are plausible.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Duplicate requests or submissions are plausible.", "The system may know the state but not know whether a later request is a duplicate or a new intent."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An idempotent operation can be invoked exactly once in practice.", "slug": "idempotence"}], "normalized_requirement": "Duplicate requests or submissions are plausible.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Duplicate requests or submissions are plausible.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A mathematical idempotent projection need not have downstream side effects.", "slug": "idempotence"}], "residual_id": "r:idempotent_operation_design:b033_a09_c3", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b033_a09_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The operation has side effects. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The operation has side effects."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A mathematical idempotent projection need not have downstream side effects.", "slug": "idempotence"}], "normalized_requirement": "The operation has state-changing or downstream side effects.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The operation has state-changing or downstream side effects.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An idempotent operation need not be deployed in a retrying workflow.", "slug": "idempotence"}], "residual_id": "r:idempotent_operation_design:b033_a09_c5", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b033_a09_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Retries are useful or unavoidable. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Retries are useful or unavoidable."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An idempotent operation need not be deployed in a retrying workflow.", "slug": "idempotence"}], "normalized_requirement": "Retries are useful or unavoidable.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Retries are useful or unavoidable.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The intended final state can be identified or bounded.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: The intended final state can be identified or bounded. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The intended final state can be identified or bounded."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The intended final state can be identified or bounded."}, {"display_text": "Audit or reconciliation requires stable interpretation of repeated attempts.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Reliability often requires retry, but naive repetition treats every attempt as a new effect. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Audit or reconciliation requires stable interpretation of repeated attempts. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Audit or reconciliation requires stable interpretation of repeated attempts.", "Reliability often requires retry, but naive repetition treats every attempt as a new effect."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Audit or reconciliation requires stable interpretation of repeated attempts."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 33, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-033", "ledger_sha256": "306d432971a76585145053e22b7ba370b87226e64869a4b880eb0e6f38a4304b"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Identity-Bounded Change", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:identity_bounded_change", "slug": "identity_bounded_change"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 3 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "An entity must be repaired, amended, refactored, restored, reconfigured, updated, or otherwise changed,\nbut later users must know whether the result is a continuing state of the same entity or a new entity\nrelated to it. Without a declared persistence rule and lineage, the identity decision is made implicitly\nby labels, custody, organizational habit, or whichever system happens to hold the record.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "An entity must be repaired, amended, refactored, restored, reconfigured, updated, or otherwise changed, but later users must know whether the result is a continuing state of the same entity or a new entity related to it. Without a declared persistence rule and lineage, the identity decision is made implicitly by labels, custody, organizational habit, or whichever system happens to hold the record."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact pattern alters some properties while an explicit identity-condition licenses continuation of the same entity.", "role_mapping": "Changed properties -> before/after alteration; constitutive persistence -> identity-condition.", "slug": "modification_event", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b033_a10_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Some properties may change while other properties, relations, or historical links are treated as constitutive of persistence. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Some properties may change while other properties, relations, or historical links are treated as constitutive of persistence."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Identity-Preserving Modification", "one_liner": "An entity undergoes an event that changes some of its properties while an identity-condition licenses calling the after-state a continuation of the same entity rather than its replacement.", "page_ref": "prime:modification_event", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Changed properties -> before/after alteration; constitutive persistence -> identity-condition.", "slug": "modification_event", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact pattern alters some properties while an explicit identity-condition licenses continuation of the same entity."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Some properties may change while other properties, relations, or historical links are constitutive of persistence.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An identity-providing kind can make the continuation classification unambiguous.", "slug": "identity_providing_kind"}], "residual_id": "r:identity_bounded_change:b033_a10_c3", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b033_a10_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A replacement, fork, split, merge, reconstruction, or successor is a plausible alternative classification. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A replacement, fork, split, merge, reconstruction, or successor is a plausible alternative classification."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An identity-providing kind can make the continuation classification unambiguous.", "slug": "identity_providing_kind"}], "normalized_requirement": "Replacement, fork, split, merge, reconstruction, or succession is a plausible alternative classification.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Replacement, fork, split, merge, reconstruction, or succession is a plausible alternative classification.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P061-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require cumulative aggregation across multiple small changes.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A sequence contains multiple individually small changes that accumulate.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve apparent acceptability for every constituent change, not merely some of them.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Each individual change appears acceptable when considered alone.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve possibility of a continuity threat and must not require that continuity is already lost.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The cumulative changes may challenge continuity.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the delayed cumulative emergence of the identity threat.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The continuity challenge emerges eventually as the changes accumulate.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must connect acceptable local steps to a potentially unacceptable cumulative identity effect.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The aggregate continuity risk contrasts with each change's apparent acceptability.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Cumulative small changes may eventually challenge continuity even when each single change appears acceptable.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Individually acceptable small changes can cumulatively threaten identity continuity over time.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P061-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A modification event can be isolated and clearly identity-preserving without cumulative erosion.", "slug": "modification_event"}], "residual_id": "r:identity_bounded_change:b033_a10_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b033_a10_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Cumulative small changes may eventually challenge continuity even when each single change appears acceptable. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Cumulative small changes may eventually challenge continuity even when each single change appears acceptable."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A modification event can be isolated and clearly identity-preserving without cumulative erosion.", "slug": "modification_event"}], "normalized_requirement": "Cumulative small changes eventually challenge continuity although each change appears acceptable.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Cumulative small changes eventually challenge continuity although each change appears acceptable.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A proposed change affects an entity that is cited, owned, regulated, versioned, insured, curated, or relied upon by stable identity.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Adaptation requires properties to change; accountability requires identity to be neither casually broken. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: A proposed change affects an entity that is cited, owned, regulated, versioned, insured, curated, or relied upon by stable identity. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A proposed change affects an entity that is cited, owned, regulated, versioned, insured, curated, or relied upon by stable identity.", "Adaptation requires properties to change; accountability requires identity to be neither casually broken"]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "A proposed change affects an entity that is cited, owned, regulated, versioned, insured, curated, or relied upon by stable identity."}, {"display_text": "Multiple systems or stakeholders need the same answer about whether pre-change obligations and records still attach.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Multiple systems or stakeholders need the same answer about whether pre-change obligations and records still attach. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Multiple systems or stakeholders need the same answer about whether pre-change obligations and records still attach."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Multiple systems or stakeholders need the same answer about whether pre-change obligations and records still attach."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 33, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-033", "ledger_sha256": "306d432971a76585145053e22b7ba370b87226e64869a4b880eb0e6f38a4304b"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Identity Bridge Building", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:identity_bridge_building", "slug": "identity_bridge_building"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 4 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a boundary-driven interpretation loop. Group membership becomes a shortcut for credibility, loyalty, threat, and blame. The same statement is heard differently depending on who says it. The same mistake is excused inside the in-group and treated as proof of incompetence outside it. The same compromise is seen as reasonable when proposed by “us” and suspicious when proposed by “them.”\n\nThis produces blocked cooperation even where shared goals exist. People may attend the same meeting, work in the same institution, or serve the same public purpose while still acting as separate camps.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "In-group/out-group identity dynamics create mistrust, exclusion, status competition, stereotype-driven interpretation, or blocked cooperation. The parties may share practical interests, but identity boundaries make the other side seem illegitimate, unsafe, inferior, threatening, or irrelevant."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P062-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must include both an intergroup boundary and a task shared across that boundary.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A group boundary separates participants who also share a task.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the direction in which boundary salience exceeds task salience.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The group boundary is more salient than the shared task.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "A group boundary is more salient than the shared task.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Group-boundary salience exceeds shared-task salience.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P062-C01-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "In-group categorization can occur without a shared task whose salience is displaced.", "slug": "in_group_out_group"}], "residual_id": "r:identity_bridge_building:b033_a11_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b033_a11_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The archetype resolves a tension between identity protection and cross-boundary cooperation: groups need enough shared identity or overlapping affiliation to work together, but too much pressure toward unity can erase differences, intensify threat, or reproduce status hierarchy. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A group boundary is more salient than the shared task.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A group boundary is more salient than the shared task.", "The archetype resolves a tension between identity protection and cross-boundary cooperation: groups need enough shared identity or overlapping affiliation to work together, but too much pressure toward unity can erase differences, intensify threat, or reproduce status hierarchy."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "In-group categorization can occur without a shared task whose salience is displaced.", "slug": "in_group_out_group"}], "normalized_requirement": "A group boundary is more salient than the shared task.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A group boundary is more salient than the shared task.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P062-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require actual existence of formal collaboration channels.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Formal channels for collaboration exist between participants.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must concern mistrust grounded in identity rather than only logistical friction.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Identity-based mistrust persists among the participants.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail failure of the formal collaboration mechanism to resolve the mistrust.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The formal channels do not overcome the identity mistrust.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Formal collaboration channels exist but do not overcome identity mistrust.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Formal collaboration channels fail to resolve identity-based mistrust.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P062-C02-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Formal and informal structures can align without identity mistrust.", "slug": "formal_vs_informal_structures"}], "residual_id": "r:identity_bridge_building:b033_a11_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b033_a11_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Formal collaboration channels exist but do not overcome identity mistrust. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Formal collaboration channels exist but do not overcome identity mistrust."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Formal and informal structures can align without identity mistrust.", "slug": "formal_vs_informal_structures"}], "normalized_requirement": "Formal collaboration channels do not overcome identity mistrust.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Formal collaboration channels do not overcome identity mistrust.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact mechanism activates generalized beliefs from a group-category cue and applies them to members.", "role_mapping": "Group stories -> stored category schema; reliance -> categorical application.", "slug": "stereotyping", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b033_a11_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Groups rely on stereotypes or inherited stories about one another. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Groups rely on stereotypes or inherited stories about one another."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Stereotyping", "one_liner": "Generalized category beliefs compress individual variation into archetypes.", "page_ref": "prime:stereotyping", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Group stories -> stored category schema; reliance -> categorical application.", "slug": "stereotyping", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact mechanism activates generalized beliefs from a group-category cue and applies them to members."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Groups rely on generalized category beliefs or inherited stories about one another.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P062-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"], ["O1", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail lack of identity salience despite the collective object's existence.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The existing collective object is not salient to participant identity.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must identify an existing shared future.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The collective object can be a future shared by the groups.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must identify an existing interdependent goal.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The collective object can be a goal requiring interdependence.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}], "predicate": "A shared future or interdependent goal exists but is not identity-salient.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An existing collective future or goal lacks identity salience.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P062-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Futures literacy concerns reflexive use of future images and does not require intergroup identity or a hidden shared goal.", "slug": "futures_literacy"}], "residual_id": "r:identity_bridge_building:b033_a11_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b033_a11_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This produces blocked cooperation even where shared goals exist. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A shared future or interdependent goal exists but is not identity-salient.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A shared future or interdependent goal exists but is not identity-salient.", "This produces blocked cooperation even where shared goals exist."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Futures literacy concerns reflexive use of future images and does not require intergroup identity or a hidden shared goal.", "slug": "futures_literacy"}], "normalized_requirement": "A shared future or interdependent goal exists but is not identity-salient.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A shared future or interdependent goal exists but is not identity-salient.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Cooperation requires maintaining difference rather than dissolving it.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The archetype resolves a tension between identity protection and cross-boundary cooperation: groups need enough shared identity or overlapping affiliation to work together, but too much pressure toward unity can erase differences, intensify threat, or reproduce status hierarchy. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: Cooperation requires maintaining difference rather than dissolving it. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Cooperation requires maintaining difference rather than dissolving it.", "The archetype resolves a tension between identity protection and cross-boundary cooperation: groups need enough shared identity or overlapping affiliation to work together, but too much pressure toward unity can erase differences, intensify threat, or reproduce status hierarchy."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Cooperation requires maintaining difference rather than dissolving it."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 33, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-033", "ledger_sha256": "306d432971a76585145053e22b7ba370b87226e64869a4b880eb0e6f38a4304b"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Identity-Resonant Persuasion Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:identity_resonant_persuasion_design", "slug": "identity_resonant_persuasion_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system needs people to consider, adopt, support, or enact a belief or behavior, but the proposal is received as out-group-coded, alien, shameful, status-threatening, or inconsistent with the audience’s self-understanding. Pure argument may be accurate yet ineffective because the audience cannot identify with the speaker, story, role, or path of action.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system needs people to consider, adopt, support, or enact a belief or behavior, but the proposal is received as out-group-coded, alien, shameful, status-threatening, or inconsistent with the audience’s self-understanding. Pure argument may be accurate yet ineffective because the audience cannot identify with the speaker, story, role, or path of action."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P062-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must make identity threat an interpretive filter on proposal reception.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Identity threat filters how the audience processes the proposal.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the proposal's technical soundness despite the identity filter.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The filtered proposal is technically sound.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must apply identity-threat filtering to a message.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The proposal can be a message.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must apply identity-threat filtering to a policy.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The proposal can be a policy.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must apply identity-threat filtering to a practice.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The proposal can be a practice.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must apply identity-threat filtering to an invitation.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The proposal can be an invitation.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "A technically sound message, policy, practice, or invitation is being filtered through identity threat.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Identity threat filters reception of a technically sound proposal.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P062-C04-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P062-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must make in-group or out-group categorization an interpretive filter on proposal reception.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A group boundary filters how the audience processes the proposal.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the proposal's technical soundness despite the group-boundary filter.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The filtered proposal is technically sound.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must apply group-boundary filtering to a message.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The proposal can be a message.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must apply group-boundary filtering to a policy.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The proposal can be a policy.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must apply group-boundary filtering to a practice.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The proposal can be a practice.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must apply group-boundary filtering to an invitation.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The proposal can be an invitation.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "A technically sound message, policy, practice, or invitation is being filtered through a group boundary.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A group boundary filters reception of a technically sound proposal.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P062-C04-U2"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P062-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must make status an interpretive filter on proposal reception.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Status filters how the audience processes the proposal.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the proposal's technical soundness despite the status filter.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The filtered proposal is technically sound.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must apply status filtering to a message.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The proposal can be a message.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must apply status filtering to a policy.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The proposal can be a policy.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must apply status filtering to a practice.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The proposal can be a practice.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must apply status filtering to an invitation.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The proposal can be an invitation.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "A technically sound message, policy, practice, or invitation is being filtered through status.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Status filters reception of a technically sound proposal.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P062-C04-U3"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P062-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must make social-role expectations an interpretive filter on proposal reception.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Role expectations filter how the audience processes the proposal.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the proposal's technical soundness despite the role-expectation filter.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The filtered proposal is technically sound.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must apply role-expectation filtering to a message.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The proposal can be a message.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must apply role-expectation filtering to a policy.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The proposal can be a policy.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must apply role-expectation filtering to a practice.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The proposal can be a practice.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must apply role-expectation filtering to an invitation.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The proposal can be an invitation.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "A technically sound message, policy, practice, or invitation is being filtered through role expectations.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Role expectations filter reception of a technically sound proposal.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P062-C04-U4"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Identification is positive self-recognition and does not require threat or adverse filtering.", "slug": "identification"}], "residual_id": "r:identity_resonant_persuasion_design:b033_a12_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b033_a12_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A technically sound message, policy, practice, or invitation is being filtered through identity threat, group boundary, status, or role expectations. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A technically sound message, policy, practice, or invitation is being filtered through identity threat, group boundary, status, or role expectations."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 4, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 4}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Identification is positive self-recognition and does not require threat or adverse filtering.", "slug": "identification"}], "normalized_requirement": "A sound proposal is filtered through identity threat, group boundary, status, or role expectations.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 4 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A sound proposal is filtered through identity threat, group boundary, status, or role expectations.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P062-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must concern audience resistance to a message, policy, practice, invitation, or equivalent proposal.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An audience resists a proposal.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must make identity non-fit or out-group association the basis of resistance.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The audience frames the proposal as incongruent with personal or in-group identity.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Audience resistance frames a proposal as not for people like us, not for me, or characteristic of them.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An audience resists a proposal by framing it as incongruent with personal or in-group identity.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P062-C05-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P062-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must concern audience resistance to a message, policy, practice, invitation, or equivalent proposal.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An audience resists a proposal.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must make anticipated erosion of group identity the reason for resistance.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The audience expects adoption to weaken collective identity.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the prospective would modality rather than require identity loss to have occurred.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The identity weakening is an anticipated consequence of adoption.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "Audience resistance claims that adopting a proposal would make the group less who it is.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An audience resists a proposal because adoption is perceived to weaken collective identity.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P062-C05-U2"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Resistance to change can arise from cost, uncertainty, or habit without identity incongruence.", "slug": "resistance_to_change"}], "residual_id": "r:identity_resonant_persuasion_design:b033_a12_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b033_a12_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The audience’s resistance includes statements such as “people like us do not do that,” “that is not for me,” “that sounds like them,” or “this would make us less who we are.” The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The audience’s resistance includes statements such as “people like us do not do that,” “that is not for me,” “that sounds like them,” or “this would make us less who we are.”"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PARTIALLY_DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Given the guard, the identity-bound audience may resist by under-updating or hardening because the proposal is processed as an identity attack; a non-proposal challenge violates the guard.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Backfire Effect", "one_liner": "The phenomenon in which evidence contradicting an identity-bound belief produces not revision but firmer commitment, because the challenge is processed as an attack on self and parried by counter-arguing that rehearses and strengthens the original position.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:backfire_effect", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "disconfirming_evidence_is_proposal", "predicate": "The disconfirming evidence is presented to the belief-holder as a proposal.", "rationale": "Independent exact-record review confirms a complete DNF branch, subtype-preserving roles, correct trigger direction, and a publication-safe expression."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "backfire_effect"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The disconfirming evidence is presented to the belief-holder as a proposal."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "backfire_effect", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P062-C05-U1", "why_it_fits": "Backfire supplies identity-protective resistance and one domain restriction identifies the resisted object as a proposal."}], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 2, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 1, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Resistance to change can arise from cost, uncertainty, or habit without identity incongruence.", "slug": "resistance_to_change"}], "normalized_requirement": "Audience resistance says the proposal is not for people like us or would weaken who we are.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "PARTIAL_EXISTING_DSA_GROUNDING", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation grounded 1 of 2 eligible atomic units; the remaining unit or units stayed open."}, "predicate": "Audience resistance says the proposal is not for people like us or would weaken who we are.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact persuasion channel renders the other consubstantial with the receiver's self-concept and values.", "role_mapping": "Credible connection -> self-recognition relation; audience values -> self-concept.", "slug": "identification", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b033_a12_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A credible connection exists between the proposal and the audience’s own values, roles, lived experience, aspirations, or legitimate group commitments. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A credible connection exists between the proposal and the audience’s own values, roles, lived experience, aspirations, or legitimate group commitments."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Identification", "one_liner": "One party aligns belief or action with another because it recognizes itself — its values, memberships, identity — in the other, with persuasion proceeding via self-concept rather than argument.", "page_ref": "prime:identification", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Credible connection -> self-recognition relation; audience values -> self-concept.", "slug": "identification", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact persuasion channel renders the other consubstantial with the receiver's self-concept and values."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A credible connection exists between the proposal and the audience's own values, roles, experience, aspirations, or commitments.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Consubstantiality cues such as biography, dialect, symbols, and group markers condition argument uptake.", "role_mapping": "Messenger or symbol cue -> one-of-us signal; uptake -> alignment through self-recognition.", "slug": "identification", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b033_a12_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Message uptake depends partly on messenger standing, narrative role, shared symbols, common experience, or value vocabulary. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Message uptake depends partly on messenger standing, narrative role, shared symbols, common experience, or value vocabulary."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Identification", "one_liner": "One party aligns belief or action with another because it recognizes itself — its values, memberships, identity — in the other, with persuasion proceeding via self-concept rather than argument.", "page_ref": "prime:identification", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Messenger or symbol cue -> one-of-us signal; uptake -> alignment through self-recognition.", "slug": "identification", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Consubstantiality cues such as biography, dialect, symbols, and group markers condition argument uptake."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Message uptake depends on messenger standing, narrative role, shared symbols, common experience, or value vocabulary.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The designer can test whether the identity connection is authentic, non-stereotyping, evidence-compatible, and agency-preserving.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Persuasion through identification needs genuine self-recognition, but identity cues are socially powerful and can easily become manipulative, flattening, exclusionary, or detached from evidence. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: The designer can test whether the identity connection is authentic, non-stereotyping, evidence-compatible, and agency-preserving. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The designer can test whether the identity connection is authentic, non-stereotyping, evidence-compatible, and agency-preserving.", "Persuasion through identification needs genuine self-recognition, but identity cues are socially powerful and can easily become manipulative, flattening, exclusionary, or detached from evidence."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The designer can test whether the identity connection is authentic, non-stereotyping, evidence-compatible, and agency-preserving."}, {"display_text": "The situation is sensitive enough that failed identification could intensify reactance, cynicism, polarization, shame, or exclusion.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The situation is sensitive enough that failed identification could intensify reactance, cynicism, polarization, shame, or exclusion. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The situation is sensitive enough that failed identification could intensify reactance, cynicism, polarization, shame, or exclusion."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The situation is sensitive enough that failed identification could intensify reactance, cynicism, polarization, shame, or exclusion."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 33, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-033", "ledger_sha256": "306d432971a76585145053e22b7ba370b87226e64869a4b880eb0e6f38a4304b"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Identity-Safe Performance Context", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:identity_safe_performance_context", "slug": "identity_safe_performance_context"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 2, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "An evaluation normally asks a participant to allocate attention to a target task. Under identity threat, the context adds a second task: monitor the social meaning of performance. The participant may scan the evaluator, suppress anxiety, rehearse how an error could be interpreted, decide whether to distance themselves from a group, or attempt to appear unusually confident. Those activities consume working memory and flexible attention, alter strategy, and make ordinary difficulty feel like evidence of non-belonging.\n\nThe resulting performance record is contaminated. An evaluator may see hesitation or reduced fluency and infer low capability. The participant may avoid an advanced opportunity or withdraw after a setback. The setting then generates outcomes that appear to validate the stereotype even when the original capability distribution would not have produced the same result in a less threatening context.\n\nThis creates a design paradox. Eliminating difficulty can make the assessment meaningless and communicate low expectations. Ignoring social meaning can make the assessment measure avoidable threat. The archetype resolves the tension by distinguishing **construct-relevant demand** from **identity-diagnostic burden**. Difficulty stays when it belongs to the capability. Cues, procedures, and interpretations change when they add unrelated identity load.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "An evaluative context unintentionally makes a participant's social identity relevant to the meaning of performance. The participant must therefore perform the focal task while also monitoring whether they belong, whether an error will confirm a stereotype, whether the evaluator is biased, and whether seeking help will itself be interpreted negatively. The resulting load can depress measured performance, reduce participation, distort strategy, and create evidence that appears to validate the original stereotype."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P062-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require a stereotype accessible in the surrounding culture, not only a private evaluator belief.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A negative stereotype is culturally available in the evaluation setting.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must link the evaluated participant to the stereotyped social group.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The stereotype concerns a social group to which a participant belongs.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail a negative group-to-capability association rather than neutral group categorization.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The stereotype associates that group with presumed weakness.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must align the stereotyped weakness with the specific capability under evaluation.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The presumed weakness concerns the capability currently being evaluated.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "A culturally available negative stereotype links a participant's social group with presumed weakness on the capability being evaluated.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A culturally available stereotype associates a participant's group with weakness in the evaluated capability.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P062-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Stereotyping can carry neutral or positive category beliefs unrelated to evaluated weakness.", "slug": "stereotyping"}], "residual_id": "r:identity_safe_performance_context:b033_a13_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b033_a13_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A culturally available negative stereotype links a participant's social group with presumed weakness on the capability being evaluated. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A culturally available negative stereotype links a participant's social group with presumed weakness on the capability being evaluated."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A complete Stereotype Threat instance without a group-linked negative capability stereotype in the current evaluative setting would lack the construct's defining stereotype, membership, and performance-diagnostic roles.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Stereotype Threat", "one_liner": "The situational performance drop that occurs when a negative group stereotype is made salient in an evaluative setting, consuming the working-memory capacity the task itself requires.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:stereotype_threat", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "stereotype_threat"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "stereotype_threat", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P062-C06-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record expressly requires a participant's membership in a negatively stereotyped group and an evaluative setting in which the stereotyped capability is performance-diagnostic. All four obligations are therefore entailed."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A negative stereotype links a participant's group with weakness on the evaluated capability.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Social identity can shape self-concept without an evaluator cueing identity in a performance setting.", "slug": "social_identity_theory"}], "residual_id": "r:identity_safe_performance_context:b033_a13_c3", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b033_a13_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Identity is explicitly highlighted, implicitly cued by representation or language, or made salient by being one of few members of a group in the setting. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Identity is explicitly highlighted, implicitly cued by representation or language, or made salient by being one of few members of a group in the setting."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Social identity can shape self-concept without an evaluator cueing identity in a performance setting.", "slug": "social_identity_theory"}], "normalized_requirement": "Identity is explicitly highlighted or implicitly made salient in the setting.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Identity is explicitly highlighted or implicitly made salient in the setting.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P062-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must make ambiguity responsible for the need to infer whether evaluation is fair.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The ambiguity is sufficient to force participants to infer fairness.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the necessity and uncertainty of the participant fairness judgment.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Participants must infer rather than directly know whether the setting is fair.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must apply the ambiguity to evaluation standards.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The ambiguous element can be evaluation standards.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must apply the ambiguity to evaluator intentions.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The ambiguous element can be evaluator intentions.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must apply the ambiguity to scoring rules.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The ambiguous element can be scoring rules.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must apply the ambiguity to bias-correction routes.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The ambiguous element can be a route for correcting biased judgment.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Standards, evaluator intentions, scoring rules, or routes for correcting biased judgment are ambiguous enough that participants must infer whether the setting is fair.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Ambiguity in an evaluation-governance element forces participants to infer whether the setting is fair.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P062-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Due process is a positive procedural regime and need not entail ambiguity about fairness.", "slug": "procedural_fairness_due_process"}], "residual_id": "r:identity_safe_performance_context:b033_a13_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b033_a13_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Standards, evaluator intentions, scoring rules, or routes for correcting biased judgment are ambiguous enough that participants must infer whether the setting is fair. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Standards, evaluator intentions, scoring rules, or routes for correcting biased judgment are ambiguous enough that participants must infer whether the setting is fair."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Due process is a positive procedural regime and need not entail ambiguity about fairness.", "slug": "procedural_fairness_due_process"}], "normalized_requirement": "Ambiguous standards or correction routes force participants to infer whether evaluation is fair.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Ambiguous standards or correction routes force participants to infer whether evaluation is fair.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P062-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must concern a comparative performance difference between identifiable subgroups.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Performance differs between subgroups.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail substantial setting sensitivity, not merely small random variation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The subgroup difference varies sharply rather than remaining stable across settings.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must tie sharp variation to context.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The subgroup difference can vary by context.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must tie sharp variation to evaluator identity or behavior.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The subgroup difference can vary by evaluator.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must tie sharp variation to how the evaluation is framed.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The subgroup difference can vary by framing.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must tie sharp variation to the configuration of identity-relevant cues.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The subgroup difference can vary by cue configuration.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Subgroup performance differences vary sharply by context, evaluator, framing, or cue configuration rather than remaining stable across settings.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Subgroup performance differences are highly setting-sensitive rather than stable.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P062-C08-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Simpson's paradox concerns aggregation reversal and need not involve identity groups or evaluator cues.", "slug": "simpsons_paradox"}], "residual_id": "r:identity_safe_performance_context:b033_a13_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b033_a13_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Subgroup differences vary sharply by context, evaluator, framing, or cue configuration rather than remaining stable across settings. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Subgroup differences vary sharply by context, evaluator, framing, or cue configuration rather than remaining stable across settings."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Simpson's paradox concerns aggregation reversal and need not involve identity groups or evaluator cues.", "slug": "simpsons_paradox"}], "normalized_requirement": "Subgroup performance differences vary sharply by evaluator, framing, cue, or context.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Subgroup performance differences vary sharply by evaluator, framing, cue, or context.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P062-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"], ["O1", "O3"], ["O1", "O4"], ["O1", "O5"], ["O1", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve participant self-report rather than infer the state solely from an observer's judgment.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A participant reports an internal state or concern in the setting.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must cover reported vigilance.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The reported state can be vigilance.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must cover reported belonging uncertainty.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The reported state can be uncertainty about belonging.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must cover reported group-representation pressure.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The reported state can be pressure to represent a group.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must cover reported fear of confirming identity-linked expectations.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The reported state can be fear of confirming expectations.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must cover unusually high concern about the reading of mistakes.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The reported state can be unusually high concern about how mistakes will be interpreted.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Participants report vigilance, belonging uncertainty, pressure to represent a group, fear of confirming expectations, or unusually high concern about how mistakes will be read.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Participants report an identity-contingent vigilance or performance concern.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P062-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Low psychological safety can involve interpersonal speaking risk without stereotype-confirmation pressure.", "slug": "psychological_safety"}], "residual_id": "r:identity_safe_performance_context:b033_a13_c7", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b033_a13_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Participants report vigilance, belonging uncertainty, pressure to represent a group, fear of confirming expectations, or unusually high concern about how mistakes will be read. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Participants report vigilance, belonging uncertainty, pressure to represent a group, fear of confirming expectations, or unusually high concern about how mistakes will be read."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_GUARDED_EQUIVALENT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "With the reporting modality fixed, the candidate's constitutive confirmation concern is necessarily participant-reported; absence of a report violates the guard.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Stereotype Threat", "one_liner": "The situational performance drop that occurs when a negative group stereotype is made salient in an evaluative setting, consuming the working-memory capacity the task itself requires.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:stereotype_threat", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "participant_reports_stereotype_confirmation_concern", "predicate": "The participant reports the threat-induced concern about confirming the group stereotype.", "rationale": "Independent exact-record review confirms a complete DNF branch, subtype-preserving roles, correct trigger direction, and a publication-safe expression."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "stereotype_threat"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The participant reports the threat-induced concern about confirming the group stereotype."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "stereotype_threat", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P062-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "Stereotype threat directly supplies the identity-contingent concern, and one reporting qualifier supplies the observation mode."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A complete instance plus the reporting event necessarily yields a participant-reported vigilance state; another defense or an unreported state violates the guard.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Identity Threat", "one_liner": "The anticipated devaluation of a positively-valued self-aspect when a situational cue makes it salient — activating a defensive response that competes with the very task or belief-revision the situation demands, and wins often enough to leave measurable costs.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:identity_threat", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1", "O2"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "participant_reports_identity_threat_vigilance", "predicate": "The participant reports vigilance as the defensive response activated by the identity threat.", "rationale": "Independent exact-record review confirms a complete DNF branch, subtype-preserving roles, correct trigger direction, and a publication-safe expression."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "identity_threat"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The participant reports vigilance as the defensive response activated by the identity threat."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "identity_threat", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P062-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "One branch-selection reporting fact projects identity threat onto the vigilance branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "With the reporting event fixed, the candidate's private belonging uncertainty is necessarily reported; a silent private conviction violates the guard.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Impostor Syndrome", "one_liner": "The pattern in which a demonstrably capable, externally-validated person keeps a private conviction that their competence is fake, because a non-updating self-assessment channel rereads each new success as proof the deception still works rather than as evidence of ability.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:impostor_syndrome", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "participant_reports_impostor_belonging_uncertainty", "predicate": "The participant reports the candidate's private uncertainty about belonging in the evaluated setting.", "rationale": "Independent exact-record review confirms a complete DNF branch, subtype-preserving roles, correct trigger direction, and a publication-safe expression."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "impostor_syndrome"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The participant reports the candidate's private uncertainty about belonging in the evaluated setting."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "impostor_syndrome", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P062-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "Impostor syndrome supplies belonging uncertainty, while one reporting qualifier supplies the packet's observation relation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Participants report vigilance, belonging uncertainty, representation pressure, or fear of confirming expectations.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A task is difficult, timed, public, competitive, diagnostic, or consequential enough that errors carry meaning beyond the immediate attempt.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when the task is genuinely evaluative and identity may change the psychological meaning of being evaluated. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: A task is difficult, timed, public, competitive, diagnostic, or consequential enough that errors carry meaning beyond the immediate attempt. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A task is difficult, timed, public, competitive, diagnostic, or consequential enough that errors carry meaning beyond the immediate attempt.", "Use this archetype when the task is genuinely evaluative and identity may change the psychological meaning of being evaluated."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "A task is difficult, timed, public, competitive, diagnostic, or consequential enough that errors carry meaning beyond the immediate attempt."}, {"display_text": "Performance depends on working memory, flexible attention, persistence, risk-taking, communication, or willingness to ask for assistance.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Those activities consume working memory and flexible attention, alter strategy, and make ordinary difficulty feel like evidence of non-belonging. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Performance depends on working memory, flexible attention, persistence, risk-taking, communication, or willingness to ask for assistance. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Performance depends on working memory, flexible attention, persistence, risk-taking, communication, or willingness to ask for assistance.", "Those activities consume working memory and flexible attention, alter strategy, and make ordinary difficulty feel like evidence of non-belonging."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Performance depends on working memory, flexible attention, persistence, risk-taking, communication, or willingness to ask for assistance."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 33, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-033", "ledger_sha256": "306d432971a76585145053e22b7ba370b87226e64869a4b880eb0e6f38a4304b"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Impedance Matching and Coupling Optimization", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:impedance_matching_and_coupling_optimization", "slug": "impedance_matching_and_coupling_optimization"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Two entities may be individually functional and nominally connected while remaining a poor transfer pair. The source produces an output with a particular range, rhythm, internal constraint, and sensitivity to load. The receiver accepts input through its own load curve, timing window, representational requirements, capacity, saturation threshold, and recovery behavior. The path and interface introduce transformations, delays, leakage, state, and environmental dependence. When these properties are not aligned, connection does not imply effective coupling.\n\nThe resulting loss has several structurally different destinations. Some transfer is reflected or explicitly returned to the source. Some is dissipated as heat, conflict, error correction, or rework. Some is delayed in queues or stored buffers and may become useful later. Some reaches the receiver but is distorted enough to lose its intended function. Some leaks beyond the declared boundary, and some remains unobserved because the accounting categories or instruments are incomplete. Treating all of these as a single efficiency percentage prevents correct diagnosis: a reflected unit calls for a different intervention from a delayed, distorted, or saturated one.\n\nA common reinforcing failure loop begins when low uptake is interpreted as insufficient source effort. The source increases power, volume, detail, reminders, staffing, or control pressure. Because the mismatch remains, the additional input produces more reflection, heat, backlog, retry, and receiver overload. Those symptoms are then read as evidence that even more input or tighter coupling is needed. Back-action can also degrade the source itself: reflected load destabilizes an amplifier, retry traffic consumes a producer, or repeated rejected work exhausts a sending team.\n\nThe deepest tension is multiobjective. A narrowly optimized match can maximize transfer at one nominal condition while losing tolerance to variation. A broadband match spreads performance across conditions but may reduce the peak. Strong coupling improves responsiveness and throughput but carries disturbances and failures in both directions. Buffers and translators absorb mismatch but add latency, hidden state, loss, and maintenance obligations. Adaptive tuning follows drift but can chase noise or oscillate when delay is ignored. The problem is therefore not to maximize an isolated ratio; it is to design and govern a transfer relationship whose useful operating envelope is commensurate with the consequences of being wrong.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A source and receiver can theoretically exchange useful flow but property mismatch at their interface rejects or degrades it. Actors respond by increasing source intensity, which often raises reflection, dissipation, noise, receiver overload, instability, and damage rather than useful transfer."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P062-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must identify useful uptake at a distinct receiving side of the transfer.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A receiver takes up a useful portion of an input.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the direction in which input growth outpaces useful uptake growth.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Growth in the input resource exceeds growth in useful receiver uptake.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must compare input effort with useful receiver uptake.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The faster-growing input resource can be effort.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must compare input power with useful receiver uptake.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The faster-growing input resource can be power.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Input effort or input power rises faster than useful receiver uptake.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Input-resource growth outpaces growth in useful receiver uptake.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P062-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A fixed mismatch can impose a constant fractional loss rather than a faster-than-uptake input curve.", "slug": "impedance_mismatch_and_coupling_efficiency"}], "residual_id": "r:impedance_matching_and_coupling_optimization:b033_a14_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b033_a14_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A common reinforcing failure loop begins when low uptake is interpreted as insufficient source effort. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Input effort or power rises faster than useful receiver uptake.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Input effort or power rises faster than useful receiver uptake.", "A common reinforcing failure loop begins when low uptake is interpreted as insufficient source effort."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_SYNTHESIS", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "An overload with no potentially useful helper labor would lack the exact sign flip in which processed helpers add capacity below saturation. Every complete instance therefore preserves useful uptake and the outpacing effort branch.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Volunteer-Management Overload", "one_liner": "The crisis failure mode in which would-be helpers arrive faster than a response system's finite credential-brief-assign-supervise intake channel can absorb them, so beyond a threshold each marginal arrival consumes net capacity rather than adding it.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:volunteer_management_overload", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "volunteer_management_overload"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "volunteer_management_overload", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P062-C10-U1", "why_it_fits": "Volunteer-Management Overload is a direct crisis-domain subtype of the input-effort branch: offered labor grows faster than the response system can convert it into useful assigned effort."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Input effort or power rises faster than useful receiver uptake.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Reflection, attenuation, dissipation, and organizational handoff loss at a coupling boundary are exact mismatch symptoms.", "role_mapping": "Interface symptom -> mismatch-induced transfer loss.", "slug": "impedance_mismatch_and_coupling_efficiency", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b033_a14_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Reflections, echoes, rejected work, handoff failure, rework, heat, vibration, distortion, or standing oscillation appear at an interface. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Reflections, echoes, rejected work, handoff failure, rework, heat, vibration, distortion, or standing oscillation appear at an interface."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Impedance Mismatch and Coupling Efficiency", "one_liner": "Property differences reduce energy or signal transfer efficiency.", "page_ref": "prime:impedance_mismatch_and_coupling_efficiency", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Interface symptom -> mismatch-induced transfer loss.", "slug": "impedance_mismatch_and_coupling_efficiency", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Reflection, attenuation, dissipation, and organizational handoff loss at a coupling boundary are exact mismatch symptoms."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Reflections, echoes, rejected work, rework, heat, vibration, distortion, or standing oscillation appears at an interface.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P062-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require a restricted success envelope rather than merely a preferred operating point.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The transfer succeeds only within a narrow operating condition.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must contrast success in the narrow envelope with failure when a relevant condition varies.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The transfer fails when a relevant condition varies outside the narrow operating condition.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail transfer failure under frequency variation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The failure-inducing variation can be frequency.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail transfer failure under load variation.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The failure-inducing variation can be load.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail transfer failure under timing variation.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The failure-inducing variation can be timing.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail transfer failure under staffing variation.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The failure-inducing variation can be staffing.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail transfer failure under context variation.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The failure-inducing variation can be context.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "A transfer works only in a narrow operating condition and fails under frequency, load, timing, staffing, or context variation.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A transfer succeeds only within a narrow operating envelope and fails when a relevant condition varies.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P062-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A mismatch can cause stable inefficiency across a broad operating range.", "slug": "impedance_mismatch_and_coupling_efficiency"}], "residual_id": "r:impedance_matching_and_coupling_optimization:b033_a14_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b033_a14_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A transfer works only in a narrow operating condition and fails under frequency, load, timing, staffing, or context variation. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A transfer works only in a narrow operating condition and fails under frequency, load, timing, staffing, or context variation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A mismatch can cause stable inefficiency across a broad operating range.", "slug": "impedance_mismatch_and_coupling_efficiency"}], "normalized_requirement": "Transfer works only in a narrow operating condition and fails under frequency, load, timing, staffing, or context variation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Transfer works only in a narrow operating condition and fails under frequency, load, timing, staffing, or context variation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Two coupled subsystems with different transfer-relevant characteristic properties are defining.", "role_mapping": "Source and receiver difference -> impedance mismatch; relevant property -> coupling variable.", "slug": "impedance_mismatch_and_coupling_efficiency", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b033_a14_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Source and receiver use incompatible physical properties, formats, vocabularies, rhythms, capacities, authority, or incentives. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Source and receiver use incompatible physical properties, formats, vocabularies, rhythms, capacities, authority, or incentives."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Impedance Mismatch and Coupling Efficiency", "one_liner": "Property differences reduce energy or signal transfer efficiency.", "page_ref": "prime:impedance_mismatch_and_coupling_efficiency", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source and receiver difference -> impedance mismatch; relevant property -> coupling variable.", "slug": "impedance_mismatch_and_coupling_efficiency", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Two coupled subsystems with different transfer-relevant characteristic properties are defining."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Source and receiver differ in the characteristic property, format, rhythm, capacity, authority, or incentive relevant to transfer.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "An adapter, transformer, buffer, matching network, staged handoff, translator, or negotiated interface is feasible.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Buffers and translators absorb mismatch but add latency, hidden state, loss, and maintenance obligations. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: An adapter, transformer, buffer, matching network, staged handoff, translator, or negotiated interface is feasible. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["An adapter, transformer, buffer, matching network, staged handoff, translator, or negotiated interface is feasible.", "Buffers and translators absorb mismatch but add latency, hidden state, loss, and maintenance obligations."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "An adapter, transformer, buffer, matching network, staged handoff, translator, or negotiated interface is feasible."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 33, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-033", "ledger_sha256": "306d432971a76585145053e22b7ba370b87226e64869a4b880eb0e6f38a4304b"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Implementation Feasibility Alignment", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:implementation_feasibility_alignment", "slug": "implementation_feasibility_alignment"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is the gap between conceptual design and operational reality. A solution may be desirable, elegant, evidence-informed, and politically approved, yet still fail because no one resolved how it fits budgets, staffing, training, handoffs, decision rights, support, maintenance, regulatory requirements, data systems, or local routines.\n\nWhen this gap is ignored, implementation becomes a late-stage collision. Teams discover too late that the design assumes unavailable labor, unclear authority, incompatible systems, unrealistic timing, excessive training burden, hidden maintenance work, or incentives that reward people for bypassing the design.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A solution is designed in an idealized context and later fails because real operational constraints, implementer capacity, workflow dependencies, incentives, authority, timing, infrastructure, or support needs were not incorporated into the design early enough."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P062-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must identify human implementers who are expected to carry out the design.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "People are expected to implement the concept or design.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail absence of implementation-alignment testing with the expected people.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Alignment between those people and the design has not been tested.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must preserve the concept's apparent value despite missing testing.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The concept appears valuable.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must preserve the concept's apparent elegance despite missing testing.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The concept appears elegant.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must preserve the concept's apparent user desirability despite missing testing.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The concept appears desirable to users.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "A concept appears valuable, elegant, or user-desirable, but the people expected to implement it have not been tested against the design.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An apparently desirable concept lacks implementation-alignment testing with the people expected to implement it.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P062-C12-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P062-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must identify institutional implementers expected to carry out or operationalize the design.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Institutions are expected to implement the concept or design.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail absence of implementation-alignment testing with the expected institutions.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Alignment between those institutions and the design has not been tested.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must preserve the concept's apparent value despite missing testing.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The concept appears valuable.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must preserve the concept's apparent elegance despite missing testing.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The concept appears elegant.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must preserve the concept's apparent user desirability despite missing testing.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The concept appears desirable to users.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "A concept appears valuable, elegant, or user-desirable, but the institutions expected to implement it have not been tested against the design.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An apparently desirable concept lacks implementation-alignment testing with the institutions expected to implement it.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P062-C12-U2"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The nirvana fallacy compares an ideal with an imperfect alternative and need not involve implementers or absent feasibility testing.", "slug": "nirvana_fallacy"}], "residual_id": "r:implementation_feasibility_alignment:b033_a15_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b033_a15_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The concept appears valuable, elegant, or user-desirable, but the people or institutions expected to implement it have not been tested against the design. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The concept appears valuable, elegant, or user-desirable, but the people or institutions expected to implement it have not been tested against the design."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 2, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 2}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The nirvana fallacy compares an ideal with an imperfect alternative and need not involve implementers or absent feasibility testing.", "slug": "nirvana_fallacy"}], "normalized_requirement": "A desirable concept has not been tested against the people or institutions expected to implement it.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 2 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A desirable concept has not been tested against the people or institutions expected to implement it.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Need-solution alignment can occur in a context with abundant implementation resources.", "slug": "need_solution_alignment"}], "residual_id": "r:implementation_feasibility_alignment:b033_a15_c2", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b033_a15_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The implementation setting has binding constraints such as limited staffing, budget, equipment, time, training, authority, procurement, integration, regulation, or maintenance capacity. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The implementation setting has binding constraints such as limited staffing, budget, equipment, time, training, authority, procurement, integration, regulation, or maintenance capacity."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Need-solution alignment can occur in a context with abundant implementation resources.", "slug": "need_solution_alignment"}], "normalized_requirement": "The implementation setting has binding staffing, budget, equipment, time, training, authority, procurement, integration, regulation, or maintenance constraints.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The implementation setting has binding staffing, budget, equipment, time, training, authority, procurement, integration, regulation, or maintenance constraints.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A solution can align to a need through one beneficiary and one simple realization path.", "slug": "need_solution_alignment"}], "residual_id": "r:implementation_feasibility_alignment:b033_a15_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b033_a15_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Multiple workflows, roles, systems, handoffs, or decision rights must line up for execution to work. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Multiple workflows, roles, systems, handoffs, or decision rights must line up for execution to work."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A solution can align to a need through one beneficiary and one simple realization path.", "slug": "need_solution_alignment"}], "normalized_requirement": "Multiple workflows, roles, systems, handoffs, or decision rights must align for execution.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Multiple workflows, roles, systems, handoffs, or decision rights must align for execution.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Lifecycle adaptability can be embedded technically without requiring new human routines.", "slug": "design_for_lifecycle_adaptability"}], "residual_id": "r:implementation_feasibility_alignment:b033_a15_c4", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b033_a15_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The design requires people to change behavior, take on new work, share information, or sustain new routines. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The design requires people to change behavior, take on new work, share information, or sustain new routines."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Lifecycle adaptability can be embedded technically without requiring new human routines.", "slug": "design_for_lifecycle_adaptability"}], "normalized_requirement": "Implementation requires people to change behavior, add work, share information, or sustain routines.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Implementation requires people to change behavior, add work, share information, or sustain routines.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The cost of discovering implementation problems late would be high because redesign, retraining, procurement, public trust, safety, compliance, or service continuity would be affected.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "When this gap is ignored, implementation becomes a late-stage collision. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The cost of discovering implementation problems late would be high because redesign, retraining, procurement, public trust, safety, compliance, or service continuity would be affected. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The cost of discovering implementation problems late would be high because redesign, retraining, procurement, public trust, safety, compliance, or service continuity would be affected.", "When this gap is ignored, implementation becomes a late-stage collision."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The cost of discovering implementation problems late would be high because redesign, retraining, procurement, public trust, safety, compliance, or service continuity would be affected."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 33, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-033", "ledger_sha256": "306d432971a76585145053e22b7ba370b87226e64869a4b880eb0e6f38a4304b"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Implicit Assumption Surfacing", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:implicit_assumption_surfacing", "slug": "implicit_assumption_surfacing"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 6, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 2, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 3, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 1, "statement": "3 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 3 of 6 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A person, group, model, policy, or design process is being guided by unstated background beliefs, defaults, expectations, or category choices that influence decisions without being available for inspection, disagreement, validation, or revision.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A person, group, model, policy, or design process is being guided by unstated background beliefs, defaults, expectations, or category choices that influence decisions without being available for inspection, disagreement, validation, or revision."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P062-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve perceived obviousness rather than entail that the decision is objectively self-evident.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The decision appears or feels obvious to the decision-makers.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require that the decision's premises remain unnamed or implicit.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The premises supporting the decision have not yet been made explicit.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the ordering between felt obviousness and later premise articulation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The apparent obviousness precedes explicit naming of the premises.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "A decision feels obvious before its premises have been named.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A decision appears obvious before its supporting premises are explicit.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P062-C13-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An enthymeme omits a premise in an argument but need not make a decision feel obvious or suppress premise review.", "slug": "enthymeme"}], "residual_id": "r:implicit_assumption_surfacing:b034_a01_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b034_a01_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A decision feels obvious before premises have been named. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A decision feels obvious before premises have been named"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An enthymeme omits a premise in an argument but need not make a decision feel obvious or suppress premise review.", "slug": "enthymeme"}], "normalized_requirement": "A decision is treated as obvious before its premises are made explicit.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A decision is treated as obvious before its premises are made explicit.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact prime requires a violating fact or shift and consequent lost warrant, neither of which follows from uncertainty alone.", "slug": "model_assumption_failure"}], "residual_id": "r:implicit_assumption_surfacing:b034_a01_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b034_a01_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A plan depends on uncertain facts or behavior. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A plan depends on uncertain facts or behavior"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact prime requires a violating fact or shift and consequent lost warrant, neither of which follows from uncertainty alone.", "slug": "model_assumption_failure"}], "normalized_requirement": "A plan depends on uncertain facts or behavior whose assumed values remain unstated.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A plan depends on uncertain facts or behavior whose assumed values remain unstated.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P062-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must include at least two users who share a surface term or label.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Multiple people use the same label.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve that the operative meanings remain implicit or assumed.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Each user's relevant meaning is implied rather than made explicit.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail semantic divergence beneath the common terminology.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The implied meanings differ across users of the shared label.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "People use a shared label while relying on different implied meanings.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Different users attach different implicit meanings to the same label.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P062-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A presentational mismatch can occur between a representation and its meaning without multiple people sharing one label under divergent implications.", "slug": "presentational_semantic_mismatch"}], "residual_id": "r:implicit_assumption_surfacing:b034_a01_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b034_a01_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: People use shared labels with different implied meanings. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["People use shared labels with different implied meanings"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A complete Microcopy Ambiguity instance cannot preserve the same terse label and the designer-user compression asymmetry while eliminating the divergent implicit readings; that divergence is the defining failure.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Microcopy Ambiguity", "one_liner": "The HCI failure where a terse interface label admits more than one reading, so the user decompresses it against a prior different from the designer's and acts correctly on the wrong interpretation.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:microcopy_ambiguity", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "microcopy_ambiguity"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "microcopy_ambiguity", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P062-C14-U1", "why_it_fits": "Microcopy Ambiguity directly instantiates one shared label carrying different unstated readings for its author and receiver. The role mapping is literal and all three obligations are entailed without a qualifier."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "People use a shared label while relying on different implied meanings.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P062-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must identify deliberative attention directed to conclusions.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A debate focuses on comparing or contesting conclusions.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must identify premises on which the conclusions materially depend.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Load-bearing premises support the debated conclusions.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail omission of premise comparison while conclusions remain the focus.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Those load-bearing premises escape comparison in the debate.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Debate remains focused on conclusions while load-bearing premises escape comparison.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Debate compares conclusions while leaving their load-bearing premises unexamined.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P062-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An informal fallacy need not involve hidden premises or conclusion-focused debate.", "slug": "informal_fallacy"}], "residual_id": "r:implicit_assumption_surfacing:b034_a01_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b034_a01_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Debate focuses on conclusions instead of premises. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Debate focuses on conclusions instead of premises"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "No counterexample survives: a bulverist contests the conclusion through an origin story precisely while leaving the claim's grounds and warrants unevaluated.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Bulverism", "one_liner": "Assume an opponent's conclusion is false, then explain the psychological or sociological cause of their 'error' — substituting a genetic account of the belief for the logical evaluation that was owed.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:bulverism", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "bulverism"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "bulverism", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P062-C15-U1", "why_it_fits": "Bulverism directly instantiates conclusion-focused contest that bypasses the load-bearing grounds and warrants."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Debate remains focused on conclusions while load-bearing premises escape comparison.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B5", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P063-C01", "dnf": [], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [], "predicate": "A representation or model appears complete.", "resolution": "SOURCE_DEFECT", "semantic_scope": "SOURCE_DEFECT", "structural_head": "Apparent completeness without a stated omission relation.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P063-C01-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Pattern completion fills missing information but does not entail that a model is presented as complete while hiding load-bearing premises.", "slug": "pattern_completion"}], "residual_id": "r:implicit_assumption_surfacing:b034_a01_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b034_a01_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A representation or model appears complete. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A representation or model appears complete"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "SOURCE_REVIEW_REQUIRED", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 1, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Pattern completion fills missing information but does not entail that a model is presented as complete while hiding load-bearing premises.", "slug": "pattern_completion"}], "normalized_requirement": "A representation appears complete although consequential premises remain outside it.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "SOURCE_REVIEW_REQUIRED", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later candidate-blind atomization found that the source wording lacks a relation required by its diagnostic reading, so this is a source-repair issue rather than evidence of a missing abstraction."}, "predicate": "A representation appears complete although consequential premises remain outside it.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 5", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B6", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The condition explicitly supplies a failed result, a load-bearing assumed condition, and evidence that the assumption did not hold.", "role_mapping": "Past failure -> lost warrant; ‘we assumed’ condition -> load-bearing assumption; retrospective finding -> violating evidence.", "slug": "model_assumption_failure", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b034_a01_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Past failure included “we assumed…”. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Past failure included “we assumed…”"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Model Assumption Failure", "one_liner": "A conclusion, forecast, or plan loses warrant when a load-bearing condition its model treated as true is false or ceases to hold, even if the reasoning inside the model remains correct.", "page_ref": "prime:model_assumption_failure", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Past failure -> lost warrant; ‘we assumed’ condition -> load-bearing assumption; retrospective finding -> violating evidence.", "slug": "model_assumption_failure", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The condition explicitly supplies a failed result, a load-bearing assumed condition, and evidence that the assumption did not hold."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A past failure is traced to a load-bearing assumption that proved false or ceased to hold.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 6", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "DISJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 34, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-034", "ledger_sha256": "090217cb137717a3656942ba215bd6a6f173301895deff4f49ab5194e4331f3a"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Implicit Bias in Knowledge Structure", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:implicit_bias_in_knowledge_structure", "slug": "implicit_bias_in_knowledge_structure"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 8, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 7, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 8 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 1 of 8 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 8}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A schema, taxonomy, model, coding frame, or conceptual map encodes hidden assumptions or value judgments that shape interpretation while presenting itself as neutral structure. The bias is not merely in one decision-maker; it is embedded in how knowledge is partitioned, named, sequenced, exemplified, and connected.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A schema, taxonomy, model, coding frame, or conceptual map encodes hidden assumptions or value judgments that shape interpretation while presenting itself as neutral structure. The bias is not merely in one decision-maker; it is embedded in how knowledge is partitioned, named, sequenced, exemplified, and connected."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Bias can be explicit and acknowledged; it does not require a category system or a claim of neutrality.", "slug": "bias"}], "residual_id": "r:implicit_bias_in_knowledge_structure:b034_a02_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b034_a02_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A category system is treated as neutral or technical. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A category system is treated as neutral or technical"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Bias can be explicit and acknowledged; it does not require a category system or a claim of neutrality.", "slug": "bias"}], "normalized_requirement": "A category system carrying value choices is treated as neutral or merely technical.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A category system carrying value choices is treated as neutral or merely technical.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P063-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the material importance of the affected cases.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The classified cases are important rather than immaterial edge cases.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail recurrence across cases or occasions, not a single anomalous assignment.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The marginal classification occurs repeatedly.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail repeated assignment to residual categories.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The important cases are repeatedly assigned to residual categories.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail repeated assignment to exception categories.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The important cases are repeatedly assigned to exception categories.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Important cases repeatedly fall into residual or exception categories.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Important cases are repeatedly assigned to marginal categories.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P063-C02-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Classification does not require recurrent residual placement or importance asymmetry.", "slug": "classification"}], "residual_id": "r:implicit_bias_in_knowledge_structure:b034_a02_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b034_a02_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Important cases repeatedly fall into residual or exception categories. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Important cases repeatedly fall into residual or exception categories"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Classification does not require recurrent residual placement or importance asymmetry.", "slug": "classification"}], "normalized_requirement": "Important cases repeatedly fall into residual or exception categories.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Important cases repeatedly fall into residual or exception categories.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P063-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must include stakeholders related to categories that are in actual use.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Stakeholders are affected by or use operative categories.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail semantic dispute over what the categories mean.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The stakeholders contest the categories' meaning.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Stakeholders contest the meaning of operative categories.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Stakeholders dispute the meaning of categories used by a knowledge structure.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P063-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Polysemy permits a term to carry multiple related meanings but does not require stakeholders to contest an operative category boundary.", "slug": "polysemy"}], "residual_id": "r:implicit_bias_in_knowledge_structure:b034_a02_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b034_a02_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Stakeholders contest the meaning of categories. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders contest the meaning of categories"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Polysemy permits a term to carry multiple related meanings but does not require stakeholders to contest an operative category boundary.", "slug": "polysemy"}], "normalized_requirement": "Stakeholders contest the meaning or boundary of operative categories.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Stakeholders contest the meaning or boundary of operative categories.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P063-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must identify a representational structure and the purpose for which it was designed.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A knowledge structure was created for an original purpose.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must give the structure actual influence over decision-making.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The knowledge structure governs or drives decisions.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require decision use outside the scope for which the structure was created.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Those decisions extend beyond the structure's original purpose.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "A knowledge structure governs decisions beyond the purpose for which it was created.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A knowledge structure governs decisions outside its original purpose.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P063-C04-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A classification may remain confined to its intended descriptive use.", "slug": "classification"}], "residual_id": "r:implicit_bias_in_knowledge_structure:b034_a02_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b034_a02_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A knowledge structure drives decisions beyond its original purpose. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A knowledge structure drives decisions beyond its original purpose"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A classification may remain confined to its intended descriptive use.", "slug": "classification"}], "normalized_requirement": "A knowledge structure governs decisions beyond the purpose for which it was created.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A knowledge structure governs decisions beyond the purpose for which it was created.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B5", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P063-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must concern viewpoint representation within a collection of examples.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A selected set of examples expresses identifiable viewpoints.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail disproportionate representation of one viewpoint in the examples, not merely its presence.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The examples overrepresent one viewpoint.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Examples overrepresent one viewpoint.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A set of examples disproportionately represents one viewpoint.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P063-C05-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P063-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must concern viewpoint representation through default choices or configurations.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Preset defaults encode or favor identifiable viewpoints.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail disproportionate representation of one viewpoint through defaults, not merely its presence.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The defaults overrepresent one viewpoint.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Defaults overrepresent one viewpoint.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Preset defaults disproportionately encode one viewpoint.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P063-C05-U2"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Stereotyping need not be encoded through examples and defaults or privilege one viewpoint in a knowledge structure.", "slug": "stereotyping"}], "residual_id": "r:implicit_bias_in_knowledge_structure:b034_a02_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b034_a02_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Examples and defaults overrepresent one viewpoint. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Examples and defaults overrepresent one viewpoint"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 2, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 2}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Stereotyping need not be encoded through examples and defaults or privilege one viewpoint in a knowledge structure.", "slug": "stereotyping"}], "normalized_requirement": "Examples and defaults systematically overrepresent one viewpoint.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 2 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Examples and defaults systematically overrepresent one viewpoint.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 5", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B6", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P063-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must concern consequences of classification error across at least two comparable affected instances.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Multiple instances are affected by misclassification.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must link the consequences to misclassification rather than unrelated conditions.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The classification error produces consequences for those instances.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail unequal or directionally asymmetric consequences rather than equal impact, without requiring a magnitude threshold.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The consequences are asymmetric across the affected instances.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Misclassification produces asymmetric consequences across affected instances.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "The consequences of misclassification differ across affected instances.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P063-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Classification exists without misclassification, affected-group asymmetry, or consequential harm.", "slug": "classification"}], "residual_id": "r:implicit_bias_in_knowledge_structure:b034_a02_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b034_a02_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Misclassification has asymmetric consequences. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Misclassification has asymmetric consequences"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "The record excludes a merely skewed but harmless dataset: it says imbalance bites when the operationally important minority and error-cost asymmetry make missed positives materially different from false alarms.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Class Imbalance", "one_liner": "Diagnose why a 99%-accurate classifier can be useless: when one class vastly outnumbers the class of interest, additive loss aggregation lets majority examples dominate the gradient, so the model learns to ignore the rare minority.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:class_imbalance", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "class_imbalance"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "class_imbalance", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P063-C06-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record explicitly couples classifier error across classes to asymmetric real-world error costs, so all three obligations are necessary features of the described pathology."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Misclassification produces asymmetric consequences across affected groups or cases.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 6", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B7", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Bias can be openly acknowledged and need not be encoded in categories or conceal a value trade-off.", "slug": "bias"}], "residual_id": "r:implicit_bias_in_knowledge_structure:b034_a02_c7", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b034_a02_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The structure hides a value tradeoff. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The structure hides a value tradeoff"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Bias can be openly acknowledged and need not be encoded in categories or conceal a value trade-off.", "slug": "bias"}], "normalized_requirement": "A knowledge structure conceals the value trade-off embedded in its categories.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A knowledge structure conceals the value trade-off embedded in its categories.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 7", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B8", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P063-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"], ["O1", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail emergence or first appearance of bias after the selected antecedent, not later detection of bias that already existed.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Bias emerges or first appears in the relevant structure or its effects.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must place bias emergence after a schema update.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The bias appears after a schema update.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must place bias emergence after a standardization effort.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The bias appears after a standardization effort.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "Bias appears after a schema update or a standardization effort.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Bias emerges after a representational revision.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P063-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Bias need not follow a schema update, and a schema update need not introduce bias.", "slug": "bias"}], "residual_id": "r:implicit_bias_in_knowledge_structure:b034_a02_c8", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b034_a02_c8", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Bias appears after a schema update or standardization effort. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Bias appears after a schema update or standardization effort"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Bias need not follow a schema update, and a schema update need not introduce bias.", "slug": "bias"}], "normalized_requirement": "Bias emerges after a schema update or standardization effort.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Bias emerges after a schema update or standardization effort.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [8], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 8", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "DISJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 34, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-034", "ledger_sha256": "090217cb137717a3656942ba215bd6a6f173301895deff4f49ab5194e4331f3a"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Incentive-Compatible Rule Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:incentive_compatible_rule_design", "slug": "incentive_compatible_rule_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is strategic divergence. A participant sees a rule, metric, contract, price, audit process, ranking, or eligibility threshold and chooses the action that benefits them. If that action differs from the system's desired behavior, the system has an incentive-compatibility problem.\n\nThis often appears as loophole exploitation, misreporting, adverse selection, hidden action, proxy optimization, collusion, free-riding, or superficial compliance. The deeper issue is that the rule is not just a command; it is an environment that teaches participants what behavior pays.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Participants have enough autonomy, private information, or strategic choice that they can gain by acting against the system's intended outcome. The written rule, metric, contract, protocol, or policy rewards behavior that is not the behavior the system actually needs."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact anatomy contains strategic agents, a message or action space, an outcome rule, and equilibrium behavior under the announced mechanism.", "role_mapping": "Participants -> agents; observed rule -> mechanism; choices -> message or action space.", "slug": "mechanism_design", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b034_a03_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Participants can choose among multiple actions after observing the rule. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Participants can choose among multiple actions after observing the rule."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Mechanism Design", "one_liner": "Rule engineering.", "page_ref": "prime:mechanism_design", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Participants -> agents; observed rule -> mechanism; choices -> message or action space.", "slug": "mechanism_design", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact anatomy contains strategic agents, a message or action space, an outcome rule, and equilibrium behavior under the announced mechanism."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Participants choose among multiple actions or messages after observing the governing rule.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Mechanism design selects rules so self-interested equilibrium behavior implements the designer's objective rather than relying on direct command.", "role_mapping": "Designer limitation -> indirect implementation; shaped choices -> equilibrium test.", "slug": "mechanism_design", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b034_a03_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The designer cannot directly command or perfectly observe the desired behavior. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The designer cannot directly command or perfectly observe the desired behavior."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Mechanism Design", "one_liner": "Rule engineering.", "page_ref": "prime:mechanism_design", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Designer limitation -> indirect implementation; shaped choices -> equilibrium test.", "slug": "mechanism_design", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Mechanism design selects rules so self-interested equilibrium behavior implements the designer's objective rather than relying on direct command."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The designer cannot directly command the desired behavior and must shape equilibrium choices through rules.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Private agent types, preferences, or information are mandatory roles in the exact record.", "role_mapping": "Private information -> agent type.", "slug": "mechanism_design", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b034_a03_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Participants hold private information about value, cost, risk, quality, need, effort, or intent. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Participants hold private information about value, cost, risk, quality, need, effort, or intent."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Mechanism Design", "one_liner": "Rule engineering.", "page_ref": "prime:mechanism_design", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Private information -> agent type.", "slug": "mechanism_design", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Private agent types, preferences, or information are mandatory roles in the exact record."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Participants possess private information about values, costs, risks, quality, need, effort, or intent.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P063-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must make the rule responsible for opening a strategic gaming path.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The current rule creates an opportunity to game its operation or metric.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail positive private payoff from gaming, not merely technical possibility.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Using that gaming path is profitable to the actor.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "The current rule creates a profitable path to game the rule.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A rule creates a profitable gaming opportunity.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P063-C08-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P063-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must make the rule responsible for opening a path around compliance.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The current rule creates an opportunity to evade its requirements.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail positive private payoff from evasion, not merely technical possibility.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Using that evasion path is profitable to the actor.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "The current rule creates a profitable path to evade the rule.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A rule creates a profitable evasion opportunity.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P063-C08-U2"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P063-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must make the rule responsible for opening a misreporting path.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The current rule creates an opportunity to report information inaccurately or strategically.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail positive private payoff from misreporting, not merely that reports can be wrong.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Using that misreporting path is profitable to the actor.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "The current rule creates a profitable path to misreport.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A rule creates a profitable misreporting opportunity.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P063-C08-U3"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P063-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must make the rule responsible for opening a free-riding path.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The current rule creates an opportunity to receive shared benefits without the expected contribution.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail positive private payoff from free-riding.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Using that free-riding path is profitable to the actor.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "The current rule creates a profitable path to free-ride.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A rule creates a profitable free-riding opportunity.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P063-C08-U4"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P063-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must distinguish the measured proxy from the rule's intended objective.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The rule operationalizes an intended objective through a proxy.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must make the rule responsible for opening the proxy-optimization path.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The current rule creates an opportunity to optimize the proxy rather than the objective.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail positive private payoff from proxy optimization.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Using that proxy path is profitable to the actor.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "The current rule creates a profitable path to optimize a proxy rather than the intended objective.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A rule creates a privately profitable proxy-optimization opportunity.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P063-C08-U5"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Mechanism design can be prospective and can implement truthful behavior; it does not require a pre-existing profitable exploit.", "slug": "mechanism_design"}], "residual_id": "r:incentive_compatible_rule_design:b034_a03_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b034_a03_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The current rule creates a profitable path to game, evade, misreport, free-ride, or optimize a proxy. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The current rule creates a profitable path to game, evade, misreport, free-ride, or optimize a proxy."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 5, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 5}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Mechanism design can be prospective and can implement truthful behavior; it does not require a pre-existing profitable exploit.", "slug": "mechanism_design"}], "normalized_requirement": "The current rule makes gaming, evasion, misreporting, free-riding, or proxy optimization profitable.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 5 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The current rule makes gaming, evasion, misreporting, free-riding, or proxy optimization profitable.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The desired behavior can be specified well enough to design and test a rule around it.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "If the desired behavior cannot be specified or verified at all, the intervention may create a new proxy to game rather than solving the problem. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: The desired behavior can be specified well enough to design and test a rule around it. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The desired behavior can be specified well enough to design and test a rule around it.", "If the desired behavior cannot be specified or verified at all, the intervention may create a new proxy to game rather than solving the problem."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The desired behavior can be specified well enough to design and test a rule around it."}, {"display_text": "Verification, reputation, payment, access, eligibility, or other consequence channels can be adjusted.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: Verification, reputation, payment, access, eligibility, or other consequence channels can be adjusted. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Verification, reputation, payment, access, eligibility, or other consequence channels can be adjusted."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Verification, reputation, payment, access, eligibility, or other consequence channels can be adjusted."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 34, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-034", "ledger_sha256": "090217cb137717a3656942ba215bd6a6f173301895deff4f49ab5194e4331f3a"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Inclusive Membership Union Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:inclusive_membership_union_design", "slug": "inclusive_membership_union_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Multiple collections must be combined so any-source membership counts, but the combined result becomes unreliable when universe scope, member identity, duplicates, source provenance, overlap, or type compatibility are implicit.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Multiple collections must be combined so any-source membership counts, but the combined result becomes unreliable when universe scope, member identity, duplicates, source provenance, overlap, or type compatibility are implicit."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The condition states the defining several-collections plus at-least-one-membership relation.", "role_mapping": "Sources -> candidate collections; any-source rule -> inclusive OR; combined set -> union.", "slug": "union", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b034_a04_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A decision, search, eligibility rule, dataset, catalog, or watchlist needs the inclusive set of all items appearing in any of several sources. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A decision, search, eligibility rule, dataset, catalog, or watchlist needs the inclusive set of all items appearing in any of several sources."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Union", "one_liner": "The elements belonging to at least one of several collections — everything that is in any of them.", "page_ref": "prime:union", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Sources -> candidate collections; any-source rule -> inclusive OR; combined set -> union.", "slug": "union", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The condition states the defining several-collections plus at-least-one-membership relation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Several source collections are combined under an inclusive any-source membership rule.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Overlap-collapsing deduplication is mandatory in the exact union structure.", "role_mapping": "Repeated member -> overlap; one retained member -> idempotent deduplication.", "slug": "union", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b034_a04_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Source collections overlap and repeated appearances must not be counted as distinct members. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Source collections overlap and repeated appearances must not be counted as distinct members."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Union", "one_liner": "The elements belonging to at least one of several collections — everything that is in any of them.", "page_ref": "prime:union", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Repeated member -> overlap; one retained member -> idempotent deduplication.", "slug": "union", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Overlap-collapsing deduplication is mandatory in the exact union structure."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Source collections overlap and repeated appearances of the same member must collapse to one.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "At-least-one membership is the defining union test.", "role_mapping": "One-source membership -> inclusive OR qualification.", "slug": "union", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b034_a04_c3a", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Membership in one source is sufficient, but downstream users still need to know which source supplied the member. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Membership in one source is sufficient, but downstream users still need to know which source supplied the member."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Union", "one_liner": "The elements belonging to at least one of several collections — everything that is in any of them.", "page_ref": "prime:union", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "One-source membership -> inclusive OR qualification.", "slug": "union", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "At-least-one membership is the defining union test."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Membership in any one contributing source is sufficient for inclusion.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P063-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must include at least two sources referring to identical underlying entities.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Multiple sources represent the same underlying elements.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail cross-source identifier mismatch for the same entities.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The sources assign different identifiers to those elements.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Sources use different identifiers for the same underlying elements.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "The same elements have different identifiers across sources.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P063-C09-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P063-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must include at least two sources referring to identical underlying entities.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Multiple sources represent the same underlying elements.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail cross-source naming-convention mismatch for the same entities.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The sources name those elements under different conventions.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Sources use different naming conventions for the same underlying elements.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "The same elements are named under different conventions across sources.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P063-C09-U2"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P063-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must include at least two sources referring to identical underlying entities.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Multiple sources represent the same underlying elements.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail cross-source type mismatch for the same entities.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The sources assign different types to those elements.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Sources assign different types to the same underlying elements.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "The same elements receive different type assignments across sources.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P063-C09-U3"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P063-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must include at least two sources referring to identical underlying entities.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Multiple sources represent the same underlying elements.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail cross-source refresh-rate mismatch for the same entities.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The sources update those elements at different cadences.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "Sources use different update cadences for the same underlying elements.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "The same elements are refreshed at different cadences across sources.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P063-C09-U4"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Union does not require heterogeneous identifiers or asynchronous updates; its contributing sets may already share exact identities.", "slug": "union"}], "residual_id": "r:inclusive_membership_union_design:b034_a04_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b034_a04_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Sources use different identifiers, naming conventions, types, or update cadences for the same underlying elements. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Sources use different identifiers, naming conventions, types, or update cadences for the same underlying elements."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 4, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 4}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Union does not require heterogeneous identifiers or asynchronous updates; its contributing sets may already share exact identities.", "slug": "union"}], "normalized_requirement": "Sources use incompatible identifiers, names, types, or update cadences for the same underlying elements.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 4 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Sources use incompatible identifiers, names, types, or update cadences for the same underlying elements.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P063-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must identify a combined collection whose proper semantics are inclusive membership.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A combined list is constructed as an inclusive membership set.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail downstream reuse that assigns validated-truth semantics.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The list is later reused as though every entry were validated truth.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the semantic mismatch between the list's construction and its reuse.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Validated-truth treatment is stronger than the list's actual inclusive-membership status.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "An inclusive combined list is reused as though it were a validated truth set.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An inclusive membership union is reused as a validated truth set.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P063-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A correctly interpreted union need not be reused as evidence of truth or validity.", "slug": "union"}], "residual_id": "r:inclusive_membership_union_design:b034_a04_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b034_a04_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A combined list is reused as if it were a validated truth set rather than an inclusive membership set. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A combined list is reused as if it were a validated truth set rather than an inclusive membership set."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A correctly interpreted union need not be reused as evidence of truth or validity.", "slug": "union"}], "normalized_requirement": "An inclusive combined list is reused as though it were a validated truth set.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "An inclusive combined list is reused as though it were a validated truth set.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Union size, overlap structure, or changes across versions become important evidence.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Multiple collections must be combined so any-source membership counts, but the combined result becomes unreliable when universe scope, member identity, duplicates, source provenance, overlap, or type compatibility are implicit. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Union size, overlap structure, or changes across versions become important evidence. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Union size, overlap structure, or changes across versions become important evidence.", "Multiple collections must be combined so any-source membership counts, but the combined result becomes unreliable when universe scope, member identity, duplicates, source provenance, overlap, or type compatibility are implicit."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Union size, overlap structure, or changes across versions become important evidence."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 34, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-034", "ledger_sha256": "090217cb137717a3656942ba215bd6a6f173301895deff4f49ab5194e4331f3a"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Incompatible Requirement Set Resolution", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:incompatible_requirement_set_resolution", "slug": "incompatible_requirement_set_resolution"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 6, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 3, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 3 of 6 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system is expected to satisfy several axioms, hard requirements, guarantees, policies, or invariants that are individually plausible but have no joint realization under the same assumptions and scope. Teams continue to optimize inside an empty feasible region, satisfy different subsets in different places, or silently weaken one commitment while leaving the original all-at-once promise intact. The conflict may be global even when every pair of commitments is compatible, so local review and intuition fail to reveal the true core.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system is expected to satisfy several axioms, hard requirements, guarantees, policies, or invariants that are individually plausible but have no joint realization under the same assumptions and scope. Teams continue to optimize inside an empty feasible region, satisfy different subsets in different places, or silently weaken one commitment while leaving the original all-at-once promise intact. The conflict may be global even when every pair of commitments is compatible, so local review and intuition fail to reveal the true core."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime requires a defined candidate domain, jointly unsatisfiable desiderata, and a proof that no all-satisfying construction exists.", "role_mapping": "Candidates -> domain; commitments -> axiom set; certificate -> joint-unsatisfiability proof.", "slug": "axiomatic_incompatibility", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b034_a05_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A formal proof, exhaustive finite analysis, dual certificate, or repeated validated model shows that no candidate satisfies all active commitments. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A formal proof, exhaustive finite analysis, dual certificate, or repeated validated model shows that no candidate satisfies all active commitments."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Axiomatic Incompatibility", "one_liner": "A small set of individually plausible axioms is provably jointly unsatisfiable, forcing a chosen trade-off.", "page_ref": "prime:axiomatic_incompatibility", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Candidates -> domain; commitments -> axiom set; certificate -> joint-unsatisfiability proof.", "slug": "axiomatic_incompatibility", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime requires a defined candidate domain, jointly unsatisfiable desiderata, and a proof that no all-satisfying construction exists."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A proof or exhaustive validated analysis establishes that no candidate satisfies all active commitments.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Contradiction requires mutually inconsistent propositions and does not entail separately successful partial designs or failed integration.", "slug": "contradiction"}], "residual_id": "r:incompatible_requirement_set_resolution:b034_a05_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b034_a05_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Different teams produce designs that each meet a different subset, but no integrated design survives the full requirement set. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Different teams produce designs that each meet a different subset, but no integrated design survives the full requirement set."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Contradiction requires mutually inconsistent propositions and does not entail separately successful partial designs or failed integration.", "slug": "contradiction"}], "normalized_requirement": "Designs satisfy different subsets of requirements, but no integrated design survives the full set.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Designs satisfy different subsets of requirements, but no integrated design survives the full set.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The atom states the exact three-desirable, hard-impossibility, pick-any-two geometry.", "role_mapping": "Three guarantees -> desirables; pick any two -> corners; checked assumptions -> impossibility scope.", "slug": "trilemma", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b034_a05_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A “pick any two,” impossibility theorem, no-free-lunch boundary, or mutually exclusive guarantee claim appears and must be checked against the actual assumptions. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A “pick any two,” impossibility theorem, no-free-lunch boundary, or mutually exclusive guarantee claim appears and must be checked against the actual assumptions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Trilemma", "one_liner": "Three desirable properties that cannot be jointly guaranteed, forcing a pick-any-two choice with a distinct dissolve-or-scope intervention catalogue.", "page_ref": "prime:trilemma", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Three guarantees -> desirables; pick any two -> corners; checked assumptions -> impossibility scope.", "slug": "trilemma", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The atom states the exact three-desirable, hard-impossibility, pick-any-two geometry."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Exactly three desirable guarantees face a checked pick-any-two impossibility under stated assumptions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A trilemma requires exactly three desirables and three pairwise-achievable corners; this atom allows any cardinality and does not establish the trilemma geometry.", "slug": "trilemma"}], "residual_id": "r:incompatible_requirement_set_resolution:b034_a05_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b034_a05_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Pairwise compatibility checks pass while the full set remains inconsistent or infeasible. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Pairwise compatibility checks pass while the full set remains inconsistent or infeasible."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A trilemma requires exactly three desirables and three pairwise-achievable corners; this atom allows any cardinality and does not establish the trilemma geometry.", "slug": "trilemma"}], "normalized_requirement": "Every pair of requirements is compatible while the full requirement set is inconsistent or infeasible.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Every pair of requirements is compatible while the full requirement set is inconsistent or infeasible.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B5", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P063-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must concern a conjunction of non-negotiable constraints rather than optional preferences.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A set contains multiple hard constraints that must hold jointly.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail an empty joint feasible region, not merely a small or costly one.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "No solution satisfies all of the hard constraints simultaneously.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must attribute infeasibility to incompatibility among the binding constraints.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The hard constraint set is what leaves the feasible region empty.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "A set of hard constraints, including safety, rights, legal, budget, timing, performance, or correctness constraints, leaves an empty feasible region.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A hard constraint set has no jointly feasible solution.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P063-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A constraint may leave many feasible candidates; constraint alone does not entail an empty intersection.", "slug": "constraint"}], "residual_id": "r:incompatible_requirement_set_resolution:b034_a05_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b034_a05_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Teams continue to optimize inside an empty feasible region, satisfy different subsets in different places, or silently weaken one commitment while leaving the original all-at-once promise intact. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Hard safety, rights, legal, budget, timing, performance, or correctness constraints leave an empty feasible region.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Hard safety, rights, legal, budget, timing, performance, or correctness constraints leave an empty feasible region.", "Teams continue to optimize inside an empty feasible region, satisfy different subsets in different places, or silently weaken one commitment while leaving the original all-at-once promise intact."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A merely difficult but satisfiable resolver instance is not dependency hell as frozen here; the exact record requires mutually incompatible constraints and no assignment satisfying them all.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Dependency Hell", "one_liner": "The pathological state where a project's transitive dependency closure holds mutually incompatible version constraints, turning installation into an NP-complete constraint-satisfaction problem that no edge-level patch can resolve.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:dependency_hell", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "dependency_hell"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "dependency_hell", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P063-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record defines a global constraint-satisfaction failure with mutually incompatible hard constraints and no jointly satisfying assignment, directly satisfying the complete branch."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Hard safety, rights, legal, budget, timing, performance, or correctness constraints leave an empty feasible region.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 5", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B6", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P063-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must include one shared latent incompatibility recurring across decentralized implementation sites.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Multiple implementers encounter the same hidden incompatibility at local points.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail divergence among local resolutions of the same conflict.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The implementers resolve that incompatibility differently from one another.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must make the decentralized divergence responsible for exception proliferation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The divergent local resolutions cause exceptions to accumulate.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Exceptions accumulate because implementers resolve the same hidden incompatibility differently at local points.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Divergent local resolutions of one hidden incompatibility accumulate as exceptions.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P063-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A contradiction need not be hidden, implemented locally, or generate accumulating exceptions.", "slug": "contradiction"}], "residual_id": "r:incompatible_requirement_set_resolution:b034_a05_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b034_a05_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Exceptions accumulate because implementers are resolving the same hidden incompatibility differently at local points. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Exceptions accumulate because implementers are resolving the same hidden incompatibility differently at local points."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A contradiction need not be hidden, implemented locally, or generate accumulating exceptions.", "slug": "contradiction"}], "normalized_requirement": "Implementers create divergent local exceptions while resolving the same hidden incompatibility.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Implementers create divergent local exceptions while resolving the same hidden incompatibility.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 6", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "DISJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The organization needs an accountable record of which promise will be changed and what remains guaranteed.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: The organization needs an accountable record of which promise will be changed and what remains guaranteed. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The organization needs an accountable record of which promise will be changed and what remains guaranteed."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "The organization needs an accountable record of which promise will be changed and what remains guaranteed."}, {"display_text": "Changing one assumption, resource bound, architecture, or scope condition may restore feasibility but would materially alter the original claim.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system is expected to satisfy several axioms, hard requirements, guarantees, policies, or invariants that are individually plausible but have no joint realization under the same assumptions and scope. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: Changing one assumption, resource bound, architecture, or scope condition may restore feasibility but would materially alter the original claim. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Changing one assumption, resource bound, architecture, or scope condition may restore feasibility but would materially alter the original claim.", "A system is expected to satisfy several axioms, hard requirements, guarantees, policies, or invariants that are individually plausible but have no joint realization under the same assumptions and scope."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 8, "text": "Changing one assumption, resource bound, architecture, or scope condition may restore feasibility but would materially alter the original claim."}, {"display_text": "A future-facing guarantee must be conditioned on observable competence, fault, input, or environment boundaries.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this deployment constraint: A future-facing guarantee must be conditioned on observable competence, fault, input, or environment boundaries. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [9], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A future-facing guarantee must be conditioned on observable competence, fault, input, or environment boundaries."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 9, "text": "A future-facing guarantee must be conditioned on observable competence, fault, input, or environment boundaries."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 34, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-034", "ledger_sha256": "090217cb137717a3656942ba215bd6a6f173301895deff4f49ab5194e4331f3a"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Independent Convergence Evidence Appraisal", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:independent_convergence_evidence_appraisal", "slug": "independent_convergence_evidence_appraisal"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system observes that multiple independent lineages have adopted, invented, or stabilized similar solutions, but it lacks a disciplined way to decide whether this convergence is evidence that the solution fits the problem, merely evidence of diffusion or imitation, or a misleading artifact of common bias, selection, or coordination pressure.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system observes that multiple independent lineages have adopted, invented, or stabilized similar solutions, but it lacks a disciplined way to decide whether this convergence is evidence that the solution fits the problem, merely evidence of diffusion or imitation, or a misleading artifact of common bias, selection, or coordination pressure."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact relation has multiple separate trajectories whose endpoints converge on the same form.", "role_mapping": "Actors or lineages -> separate trajectories; similar solution -> convergent endpoint.", "slug": "convergent_evolution", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b034_a06_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The similarity may appear in biological forms, software patterns, institutional practices, design conventions, measurement routines, language structures, or operational procedures. In this condition set, the requirement is: Several separate actors, lineages, systems, communities, or fields arrive at a similar solution form.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Several apparently separate actors, lineages, systems, communities, or fields arrive at a similar solution-shape."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Convergent Evolution", "one_liner": "Separate lineages independently arrive at the same form or solution under similar pressures, with no shared inheritance and no interaction between them connecting the outcomes — the same answer found more than once.", "page_ref": "prime:convergent_evolution", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Actors or lineages -> separate trajectories; similar solution -> convergent endpoint.", "slug": "convergent_evolution", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact relation has multiple separate trajectories whose endpoints converge on the same form."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Several separate actors, lineages, systems, communities, or fields arrive at a similar solution form.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact prime requires independence and both non-inheritance and non-transmission exclusions to be discharged; plausibility alone is insufficient.", "slug": "convergent_evolution"}], "residual_id": "r:independent_convergence_evidence_appraisal:b034_a06_c3", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b034_a06_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The apparent examples may share training, vendors, source code, consultants, cultural transmission, citations, procurement incentives, or common infrastructure. In this condition set, the requirement is: Causal independence of the converging lineages is plausible but has not been established.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Lineage independence is plausible but not yet established."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact prime requires independence and both non-inheritance and non-transmission exclusions to be discharged; plausibility alone is insufficient.", "slug": "convergent_evolution"}], "normalized_requirement": "Causal independence of the converging lineages is plausible but has not been established.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Causal independence of the converging lineages is plausible but has not been established.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Similar pressure across independent lineages is a mandatory causal role in the exact structure.", "role_mapping": "Comparable environment -> shared selective pressure.", "slug": "convergent_evolution", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b034_a06_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "If the pressures differ, similarity may reflect superficial analogy rather than the same fit-producing constraint. In this condition set, the requirement is: The separate trajectories face comparable problem pressures or selection environments.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The problem pressure or selection environment is comparable across cases."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Convergent Evolution", "one_liner": "Separate lineages independently arrive at the same form or solution under similar pressures, with no shared inheritance and no interaction between them connecting the outcomes — the same answer found more than once.", "page_ref": "prime:convergent_evolution", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Comparable environment -> shared selective pressure.", "slug": "convergent_evolution", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Similar pressure across independent lineages is a mandatory causal role in the exact structure."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The separate trajectories face comparable problem pressures or selection environments.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The solution-shape is being used as evidence for adoption, standardization, generalization, or design choice.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The archetype is relevant when convergence is invoked as a reason, not merely when convergence is observed descriptively. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: The solution-shape is being used as evidence for adoption, standardization, generalization, or design choice. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The solution-shape is being used as evidence for adoption, standardization, generalization, or design choice.", "The archetype is relevant when convergence is invoked as a reason, not merely when convergence is observed descriptively."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "The solution-shape is being used as evidence for adoption, standardization, generalization, or design choice."}, {"display_text": "The decision requires a confidence shift under incomplete evidence.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The archetype is most useful when direct proof is unavailable but comparative evidence can improve judgment. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: The decision requires a confidence shift under incomplete evidence. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The decision requires a confidence shift under incomplete evidence.", "The archetype is most useful when direct proof is unavailable but comparative evidence can improve judgment."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The decision requires a confidence shift under incomplete evidence."}, {"display_text": "There are risks of herding, false unanimity, survivorship bias, or standardization pressure.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The same repeated solution can be strong evidence, weak evidence, or evidence of dependency depending on these risks. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: There are risks of herding, false unanimity, survivorship bias, or standardization pressure. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["There are risks of herding, false unanimity, survivorship bias, or standardization pressure.", "The same repeated solution can be strong evidence, weak evidence, or evidence of dependency depending on these risks."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "There are risks of herding, false unanimity, survivorship bias, or standardization pressure."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 34, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-034", "ledger_sha256": "090217cb137717a3656942ba215bd6a6f173301895deff4f49ab5194e4331f3a"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Independent Convergence Recognition and Transfer Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:independent_convergence_recognition_and_transfer_design", "slug": "independent_convergence_recognition_and_transfer_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A recurring form, behavior, solution, institutional arrangement, or design appears in multiple separated contexts. Without a disciplined convergence frame, observers may underuse it by treating every case as isolated, overuse it by assuming universal optimality, or misread it by ignoring hidden inheritance, diffusion, imitation, common tooling, or superficial resemblance.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A recurring form, behavior, solution, institutional arrangement, or design appears in multiple separated contexts. Without a disciplined convergence frame, observers may underuse it by treating every case as isolated, overuse it by assuming universal optimality, or misread it by ignoring hidden inheritance, diffusion, imitation, common tooling, or superficial resemblance."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Convergence of endpoints on a similar solution is mandatory in the exact record.", "role_mapping": "Repeated solution -> endpoint sameness across trajectories.", "slug": "convergent_evolution", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b034_a07_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Repeated solution appears. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Repeated solution appears"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Convergent Evolution", "one_liner": "Separate lineages independently arrive at the same form or solution under similar pressures, with no shared inheritance and no interaction between them connecting the outcomes — the same answer found more than once.", "page_ref": "prime:convergent_evolution", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Repeated solution -> endpoint sameness across trajectories.", "slug": "convergent_evolution", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Convergence of endpoints on a similar solution is mandatory in the exact record."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Several trajectories exhibit a repeated or similar solution form.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Convergent evolution requires established causal independence, not merely a plausible untested separation.", "slug": "convergent_evolution"}], "residual_id": "r:independent_convergence_recognition_and_transfer_design:b034_a07_c2", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b034_a07_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Independence is plausible but unproven. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Independence is plausible but unproven"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Convergent evolution requires established causal independence, not merely a plausible untested separation.", "slug": "convergent_evolution"}], "normalized_requirement": "Independence of the trajectories is plausible but unproven.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Independence of the trajectories is plausible but unproven.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Similar pressures are the mandatory shared causal context for independent convergence.", "role_mapping": "Pressure similarity -> common selective context.", "slug": "convergent_evolution", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b034_a07_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Pressure similarity matters. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Pressure similarity matters"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Convergent Evolution", "one_liner": "Separate lineages independently arrive at the same form or solution under similar pressures, with no shared inheritance and no interaction between them connecting the outcomes — the same answer found more than once.", "page_ref": "prime:convergent_evolution", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Pressure similarity -> common selective context.", "slug": "convergent_evolution", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Similar pressures are the mandatory shared causal context for independent convergence."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Comparable problem pressure or selection environment could explain the repeated form.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Transfer temptation exists.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: Transfer temptation exists. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Transfer temptation exists"]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Transfer temptation exists"}, {"display_text": "False convergence would be costly.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: False convergence would be costly. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["False convergence would be costly"]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "False convergence would be costly"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 34, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-034", "ledger_sha256": "090217cb137717a3656942ba215bd6a6f173301895deff4f49ab5194e4331f3a"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Independent Evidence Triangulation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:independent_evidence_triangulation", "slug": "independent_evidence_triangulation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A consequential claim rests on one source, method, observer, model, or context, or on several streams whose apparent plurality hides shared lineage and common-mode error.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A consequential claim rests on one source, method, observer, model, or context, or on several streams whose apparent plurality hides shared lineage and common-mode error."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact practice deliberately combines methodologically distinct sources or methods to cross-validate one claim.", "role_mapping": "Different methods -> methodologically distinct channels; different failures -> independent error structure.", "slug": "triangulation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b034_a08_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Known methods observe different aspects or fail in different ways. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Known methods observe different aspects or fail in different ways."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Triangulation", "one_liner": "Cross-verifying a claim by combining multiple independent sources or methods so their convergence raises confidence and their divergence exposes hidden bias or context.", "page_ref": "prime:triangulation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Different methods -> methodologically distinct channels; different failures -> independent error structure.", "slug": "triangulation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact practice deliberately combines methodologically distinct sources or methods to cross-validate one claim."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Multiple methods observe different aspects of the claim or carry different failure modes.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P063-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must include multiple nominally distinct evidence sources.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "At least two evidence sources are treated as separate sources.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve possible direct copying and must not require that copying is proven.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "One source may copy another source's evidence or claims.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "Sources may copy one another.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Nominally separate evidence sources may be directly dependent through copying.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P063-C13-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P063-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must include multiple nominally distinct evidence sources.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "At least two evidence sources are treated as separate sources.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve possible common upstream dependence and must not require that sharing is proven.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Those sources may draw on the same upstream data.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "Sources may share upstream data.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Nominally separate evidence sources may depend on the same upstream data.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P063-C13-U2"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact relation selects independent sources; shared upstream dependence defeats rather than follows from triangulation.", "slug": "triangulation"}], "residual_id": "r:independent_evidence_triangulation:b034_a08_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b034_a08_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Sources may copy one another or share upstream data. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Sources may copy one another or share upstream data."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PARTIALLY_DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A complete Quote Laundering chain cannot preserve successive citation venues while making every venue independent of prior copied claims; the hop-indexed retransmission is constitutive.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Quote Laundering", "one_liner": "A provisional but accurate statement is cited across successive venues that each strip its caveats and scope, until it circulates as authoritative settled fact — a channel failure, not a false source, so it resists source correction and needs traceability instead.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:quote_laundering", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "quote_laundering"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "quote_laundering", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P063-C13-U1", "why_it_fits": "Quote Laundering directly entails nominally separate venues whose claims are citation-dependent copies of upstream claims. It therefore instantiates direct dependence through copying."}], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 2, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 1, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact relation selects independent sources; shared upstream dependence defeats rather than follows from triangulation.", "slug": "triangulation"}], "normalized_requirement": "Nominally separate sources may copy one another or share upstream data.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "PARTIAL_EXISTING_DSA_GROUNDING", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation grounded 1 of 2 eligible atomic units; the remaining unit or units stayed open."}, "predicate": "Nominally separate sources may copy one another or share upstream data.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Explicit comparison of divergent results to expose bias, context, or a need for refinement is part of the exact structure.", "role_mapping": "Disagreement -> divergence; revealed boundary or bias -> diagnostic comparison.", "slug": "triangulation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b034_a08_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Disagreement could reveal a boundary, bias, or hidden context. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Disagreement could reveal a boundary, bias, or hidden context."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Triangulation", "one_liner": "Cross-verifying a claim by combining multiple independent sources or methods so their convergence raises confidence and their divergence exposes hidden bias or context.", "page_ref": "prime:triangulation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Disagreement -> divergence; revealed boundary or bias -> diagnostic comparison.", "slug": "triangulation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Explicit comparison of divergent results to expose bias, context, or a need for refinement is part of the exact structure."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Disagreement across methods can expose a boundary, bias, contradiction, or hidden context.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P063-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must identify an expressed confidence level associated with an evidential claim.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A claim uses language expressing a level of confidence.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the any-one-stream baseline across all individual streams.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Each individual evidence stream has a bounded level of warrant.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the direction in which confidence outruns individual-stream support.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The expressed confidence exceeds what every single stream can warrant on its own.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Confidence language exceeds what any one evidence stream can warrant.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Expressed confidence exceeds the warrant supplied by every individual evidence stream.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P063-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Triangulation can be performed without an existing overstatement of confidence by any one stream.", "slug": "triangulation"}], "residual_id": "r:independent_evidence_triangulation:b034_a08_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b034_a08_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Confidence language exceeds what any one stream can warrant. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Confidence language exceeds what any one stream can warrant."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Triangulation can be performed without an existing overstatement of confidence by any one stream.", "slug": "triangulation"}], "normalized_requirement": "Confidence language exceeds what any one evidence stream can warrant.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Confidence language exceeds what any one evidence stream can warrant.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The decision is too consequential for a single evidence channel.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Decision makers need synthesis across partial views, but combining evidence can create false confidence when streams are dependent, incomparable, selectively included, or forced into agreement. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The decision is too consequential for a single evidence channel. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The decision is too consequential for a single evidence channel.", "Decision makers need synthesis across partial views, but combining evidence can create false confidence when streams are dependent, incomparable, selectively included, or forced into agreement."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "The decision is too consequential for a single evidence channel."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 34, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-034", "ledger_sha256": "090217cb137717a3656942ba215bd6a6f173301895deff4f49ab5194e4331f3a"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Independent Generating Set Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:independent_generating_set_design", "slug": "independent_generating_set_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 7, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 2, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 5, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 8 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 2 of 7 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 8}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system needs a compact set of primitives, modes, features, controls, or functions from which every admissible target can be generated, but the available collection is incomplete, redundant, unstable, or semantically inconsistent. Without a true basis, some targets cannot be represented, coefficients are nonunique, hidden dependencies inflate apparent dimension, numerical noise is amplified, and teams exchange coordinates that only make sense under incompatible generator sets. Merely reducing features or choosing a convenient representation does not solve the full problem because completeness, independence, reconstruction, and basis-change behavior remain ungoverned.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system needs a compact set of primitives, modes, features, controls, or functions from which every admissible target can be generated, but the available collection is incomplete, redundant, unstable, or semantically inconsistent. Without a true basis, some targets cannot be represented, coefficients are nonunique, hidden dependencies inflate apparent dimension, numerical noise is amplified, and teams exchange coordinates that only make sense under incompatible generator sets. Merely reducing features or choosing a convenient representation does not solve the full problem because completeness, independence, reconstruction, and basis-change behavior remain ungoverned."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record begins with a space, combining rule, and generating subset whose combinations cover the space.", "role_mapping": "Declared space -> space; reusable generators -> generating set and combining rule.", "slug": "basis", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b034_a09_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A declared space or model class must be represented by combinations of reusable generators. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A declared space or model class must be represented by combinations of reusable generators."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Basis", "one_liner": "A minimal independent generating set — the smallest collection from which every element of a space can be produced, with no member derivable from the others.", "page_ref": "prime:basis", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Declared space -> space; reusable generators -> generating set and combining rule.", "slug": "basis", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record begins with a space, combining rule, and generating subset whose combinations cover the space."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A declared space is represented exactly by combinations of reusable generators.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P064-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must include a collection of proposed generators, features, controls, or equivalent contributors.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A collection contains multiple candidate generators.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve possibility or suspicion and must not require a proven actual dependence failure.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The dependence failure is suspected or possible rather than established as actual.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must entail possible redundancy among members of the generator collection.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The collection may contain redundant generators.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must entail that distinct proposed generators may be observationally or representationally aliased.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The collection may contain aliased generators.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must entail possible collinearity among members of the generator collection.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The collection may contain collinear generators.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "The candidate generator collection may exhibit redundancy, aliasing, or collinearity.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A candidate generator collection may contain dependent or non-distinct generators.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P064-C01-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P064-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must include a parameter or equivalent latent contributor whose value or contribution is intended to be identified.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The candidate collection contains one or more parameters to be identified.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must include evidence, observations, or outputs against which parameter values could be distinguished.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Evidence or observables are available as the basis for identifying the parameter.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail failure of unique identification from the available evidence, not merely uncertainty in an otherwise identifiable estimate.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The available evidence may fail to distinguish the parameter uniquely.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve possibility or suspicion and must not require proven nonidentifiability.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Parameter nonidentifiability is suspected or possible rather than established as actual.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "Parameters in the candidate generator collection may be unidentifiable from available evidence or observables.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Available evidence may fail to distinguish a candidate parameter uniquely.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P064-C01-U2"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A basis is independent and nonredundant; suspected redundancy describes a candidate set that may fail to be a basis.", "slug": "basis"}], "residual_id": "r:independent_generating_set_design:b034_a09_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b034_a09_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The candidate generator collection contains suspected redundancy, aliasing, collinearity, or unidentifiable parameters. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The candidate generator collection contains suspected redundancy, aliasing, collinearity, or unidentifiable parameters."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 2, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 2}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A basis is independent and nonredundant; suspected redundancy describes a candidate set that may fail to be a basis.", "slug": "basis"}], "normalized_requirement": "The candidate generator collection may contain redundancy, aliasing, collinearity, or unidentifiable parameters.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 2 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The candidate generator collection may contain redundancy, aliasing, collinearity, or unidentifiable parameters.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record begins with a space, combining rule, and generating subset whose combinations cover the space.", "role_mapping": "Declared space -> space; reusable generators -> generating set and combining rule.", "slug": "basis", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b034_a09_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A declared space or model class must be represented by combinations of reusable generators. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A declared space or model class must be represented by combinations of reusable generators."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Basis", "one_liner": "A minimal independent generating set — the smallest collection from which every element of a space can be produced, with no member derivable from the others.", "page_ref": "prime:basis", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Declared space -> space; reusable generators -> generating set and combining rule.", "slug": "basis", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record begins with a space, combining rule, and generating subset whose combinations cover the space."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A declared space is represented exactly by combinations of reusable generators.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P064-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require one or more targets rather than merely permit an empty target set.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "At least one target is affected.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must concern a target that belongs to the intended admissible target class.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The affected target is valid or admissible for the representation task.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must relate the target to reconstruction from the generators currently in use.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The target is reconstructed using the current generator collection.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail deficient reconstruction quality, not merely that reconstruction is attempted.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The reconstruction quality is poor relative to an adequate reconstruction.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Some valid targets reconstruct poorly from the current generator collection.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "At least one valid target has poor reconstruction under the current generators.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P064-C02-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P064-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require one or more targets rather than merely permit an empty target set.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "At least one target is affected.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must concern a target that belongs to the intended admissible target class.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The affected target is valid or admissible for the representation task.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must include a representational span produced by the generators currently in use.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The current generators define a span of representable targets.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail exclusion from the span, not merely uncertain or low-quality reconstruction within it.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The valid target is not contained in that current span.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Some valid targets fall outside the current span.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "At least one valid target is outside the span of the current generators.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P064-C02-U2"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A basis spans every element of its space exactly; targets outside the span describe a failed candidate basis.", "slug": "basis"}], "residual_id": "r:independent_generating_set_design:b034_a09_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b034_a09_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Some valid targets reconstruct poorly or fall outside the current span. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Some valid targets reconstruct poorly or fall outside the current span."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A complete underfitting instance whose hypothesis class is not defined by the packet's current generator collection would fail O3; the guard excludes exactly that counterexample.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Underfitting", "one_liner": "The failure mode where a model's hypothesis class is too restrictive to capture the structure genuinely present in the data — high bias, with training and test error both elevated and close together — curable only by a richer functional form, not by more data or regularization.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:underfitting", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O3"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "hypothesis_class_is_current_generator_family", "predicate": "The model's hypothesis class is the reconstruction family generated by the current candidate generators.", "rationale": "Publication-safety audit found no complete candidate-plus-qualifier instance that preserves the expression while falsifying the selected complete DNF branch."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "underfitting"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The model's hypothesis class is the reconstruction family generated by the current candidate generators."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "underfitting", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P064-C02-U1", "why_it_fits": "Underfitting directly supplies a valid signal that the current model family reconstructs poorly. One atomic binding of that model family to the current generators supplies the only missing role relation."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "An underfitting model whose hypothesis class is not the span of the packet's current generators can miss signal without satisfying O3; the guard rules out precisely that instance.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Underfitting", "one_liner": "The failure mode where a model's hypothesis class is too restrictive to capture the structure genuinely present in the data — high bias, with training and test error both elevated and close together — curable only by a richer functional form, not by more data or regularization.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:underfitting", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O3"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "hypothesis_class_equals_current_generator_span", "predicate": "The model's hypothesis class is exactly the span of the current candidate generators.", "rationale": "Publication-safety audit found no complete candidate-plus-qualifier instance that preserves the expression while falsifying the selected complete DNF branch."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "underfitting"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The model's hypothesis class is exactly the span of the current candidate generators."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "underfitting", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P064-C02-U2", "why_it_fits": "The DSA directly entails a valid target lying outside an impoverished representable family. Binding that family to the span of the current generators supplies the sole missing source-specific relation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Some valid targets reconstruct poorly or lie outside the current span.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record begins with a space, combining rule, and generating subset whose combinations cover the space.", "role_mapping": "Declared space -> space; reusable generators -> generating set and combining rule.", "slug": "basis", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b034_a09_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A declared space or model class must be represented by combinations of reusable generators. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A declared space or model class must be represented by combinations of reusable generators."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Basis", "one_liner": "A minimal independent generating set — the smallest collection from which every element of a space can be produced, with no member derivable from the others.", "page_ref": "prime:basis", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Declared space -> space; reusable generators -> generating set and combining rule.", "slug": "basis", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record begins with a space, combining rule, and generating subset whose combinations cover the space."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A declared space is represented exactly by combinations of reusable generators.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P064-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must include multiple distinct teams, instruments, models, systems, or equivalent implementations.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "At least two distinct implementations are involved.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a common represented space rather than unrelated domains.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The implementations represent the same underlying space.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must relate each implementation to a coordinate or equivalent encoding of the shared space.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Each implementation uses a coordinate system for that space.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail cross-implementation incompatibility, not merely different but interoperable coordinates.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The coordinate systems are incompatible across implementations.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Different implementations use incompatible coordinate systems for the same underlying space.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Multiple implementations encode one underlying space with mutually incompatible coordinates.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P064-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Different bases can be related by a loss-free change of basis and need not be operationally incompatible.", "slug": "basis"}], "residual_id": "r:independent_generating_set_design:b034_a09_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b034_a09_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Different teams, instruments, models, or software systems use incompatible coordinate systems for the same space. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Different teams, instruments, models, or software systems use incompatible coordinate systems for the same space."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Different bases can be related by a loss-free change of basis and need not be operationally incompatible.", "slug": "basis"}], "normalized_requirement": "Different implementations use incompatible coordinates for the same underlying space.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Different implementations use incompatible coordinates for the same underlying space.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record begins with a space, combining rule, and generating subset whose combinations cover the space.", "role_mapping": "Declared space -> space; reusable generators -> generating set and combining rule.", "slug": "basis", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b034_a09_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A declared space or model class must be represented by combinations of reusable generators. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A declared space or model class must be represented by combinations of reusable generators."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Basis", "one_liner": "A minimal independent generating set — the smallest collection from which every element of a space can be produced, with no member derivable from the others.", "page_ref": "prime:basis", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Declared space -> space; reusable generators -> generating set and combining rule.", "slug": "basis", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record begins with a space, combining rule, and generating subset whose combinations cover the space."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A declared space is represented exactly by combinations of reusable generators.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P064-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must concern the apparent dimensionality of a model, matrix, decomposition, or equivalent representation.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A model or representation has an apparent dimension.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail a change in apparent dimension under a setting comparison rather than a fixed high or low dimension.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The apparent dimension differs across analysis settings.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfies this branch only when changing thresholds changes apparent dimension.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The compared settings differ in thresholds.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfies this branch only when changing samples changes apparent dimension.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The compared settings differ in samples.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfies this branch only when changing units changes apparent dimension.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The compared settings differ in units.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfies this branch only when changing numerical implementations changes apparent dimension.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The compared settings differ in numerical implementations.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "The representation's apparent dimension changes across thresholds, samples, units, or numerical implementations.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A representation's apparent dimension is unstable across an analysis-setting change.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P064-C04-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Dimension is invariant for a fixed space; instability across measurement choices signals an unresolved empirical representation problem.", "slug": "dimension"}], "residual_id": "r:independent_generating_set_design:b034_a09_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b034_a09_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A model’s apparent dimension changes across thresholds, samples, units, or numerical implementations. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A model’s apparent dimension changes across thresholds, samples, units, or numerical implementations."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Dimension is invariant for a fixed space; instability across measurement choices signals an unresolved empirical representation problem.", "slug": "dimension"}], "normalized_requirement": "The representation's apparent dimension changes across thresholds, samples, units, or numerical implementations.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The representation's apparent dimension changes across thresholds, samples, units, or numerical implementations.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B5", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record begins with a space, combining rule, and generating subset whose combinations cover the space.", "role_mapping": "Declared space -> space; reusable generators -> generating set and combining rule.", "slug": "basis", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b034_a09_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A declared space or model class must be represented by combinations of reusable generators. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A declared space or model class must be represented by combinations of reusable generators."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Basis", "one_liner": "A minimal independent generating set — the smallest collection from which every element of a space can be produced, with no member derivable from the others.", "page_ref": "prime:basis", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Declared space -> space; reusable generators -> generating set and combining rule.", "slug": "basis", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record begins with a space, combining rule, and generating subset whose combinations cover the space."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A declared space is represented exactly by combinations of reusable generators.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record distinguishes basis-independent existence from basis-relative coordinates and says basis choice tunes sparsity, projection, and decomposition.", "role_mapping": "Several bases -> alternative coordinate systems; secondary criteria -> workability tuned by basis choice.", "slug": "basis", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b034_a09_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: There are many valid bases and secondary criteria such as conditioning, locality, sparsity, or interpretability matter. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["There are many valid bases and secondary criteria such as conditioning, locality, sparsity, or interpretability matter."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Basis", "one_liner": "A minimal independent generating set — the smallest collection from which every element of a space can be produced, with no member derivable from the others.", "page_ref": "prime:basis", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Several bases -> alternative coordinate systems; secondary criteria -> workability tuned by basis choice.", "slug": "basis", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record distinguishes basis-independent existence from basis-relative coordinates and says basis choice tunes sparsity, projection, and decomposition."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Several valid bases exist and the choice among them affects conditioning, locality, sparsity, or interpretability.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 5", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B6", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record begins with a space, combining rule, and generating subset whose combinations cover the space.", "role_mapping": "Declared space -> space; reusable generators -> generating set and combining rule.", "slug": "basis", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b034_a09_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A declared space or model class must be represented by combinations of reusable generators. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A declared space or model class must be represented by combinations of reusable generators."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Basis", "one_liner": "A minimal independent generating set — the smallest collection from which every element of a space can be produced, with no member derivable from the others.", "page_ref": "prime:basis", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Declared space -> space; reusable generators -> generating set and combining rule.", "slug": "basis", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record begins with a space, combining rule, and generating subset whose combinations cover the space."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A declared space is represented exactly by combinations of reusable generators.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P064-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must involve a basis, generator set, or equivalent representation inferred from data.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A basis or generator representation is learned from data.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve risk or possibility and must not require observed drift.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Drift is possible rather than asserted as actual.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail possible uncontrolled temporal or condition-linked drift in the learned representation, not any intentional update.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The learned basis may drift over time or changing data conditions.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "A basis learned from data may drift.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A data-learned basis may drift over time or changing data conditions.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P064-C05-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P064-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must involve a basis, generator set, or equivalent representation inferred from training data.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A basis or generator representation is learned from training data.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve risk or possibility and must not require observed overfitting.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Overfitting is possible rather than asserted as actual.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail possible overfit of the learned representation to its training data.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The learned basis may capture training-specific structure that does not generalize.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "A basis learned from data may overfit its training data.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A data-learned basis may fit training-specific structure rather than general structure.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P064-C05-U2"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P064-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must involve a basis, generator set, or equivalent representation learned under bounded training conditions.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A basis or generator representation is learned within a training regime.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve risk or possibility and must not require observed failure.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Failure is possible rather than asserted as actual.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve application beyond the domain or regime represented during training.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The application setting lies outside the basis's training regime.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must link possible representational failure to use outside the training regime.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The learned basis may fail in that out-of-regime setting.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "A basis learned from data may fail outside its training regime.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A data-learned basis may fail when applied beyond its training regime.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P064-C05-U3"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An exact basis is an algebraic relation and need not be learned from data, temporally unstable, or evaluated out of distribution.", "slug": "basis"}], "residual_id": "r:independent_generating_set_design:b034_a09_c8", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b034_a09_c8", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A basis learned from data may drift, overfit, or fail outside the training regime. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A basis learned from data may drift, overfit, or fail outside the training regime."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 3, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 3}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An exact basis is an algebraic relation and need not be learned from data, temporally unstable, or evaluated out of distribution.", "slug": "basis"}], "normalized_requirement": "A data-learned basis may drift, overfit, or fail outside its training regime.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 3 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A data-learned basis may drift, overfit, or fail outside its training regime.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [8], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 6", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B7", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record begins with a space, combining rule, and generating subset whose combinations cover the space.", "role_mapping": "Declared space -> space; reusable generators -> generating set and combining rule.", "slug": "basis", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b034_a09_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A declared space or model class must be represented by combinations of reusable generators. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A declared space or model class must be represented by combinations of reusable generators."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Basis", "one_liner": "A minimal independent generating set — the smallest collection from which every element of a space can be produced, with no member derivable from the others.", "page_ref": "prime:basis", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Declared space -> space; reusable generators -> generating set and combining rule.", "slug": "basis", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record begins with a space, combining rule, and generating subset whose combinations cover the space."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A declared space is represented exactly by combinations of reusable generators.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P063-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must concern a generating collection containing dependence or redundancy.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A generating dictionary is redundant.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require failure of coefficient uniqueness.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Representations in the dictionary have nonunique coefficients.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail application of basis terminology despite redundancy and nonuniqueness.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The redundant dictionary is nevertheless described as a basis.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "A redundant dictionary is described as a basis even though its coefficients are not unique.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A redundant generating dictionary with nonunique coefficients is mislabeled as a basis.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P063-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A basis is independent and gives unique coordinates; a redundant nonunique dictionary is explicitly not one.", "slug": "basis"}], "residual_id": "r:independent_generating_set_design:b034_a09_c10", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b034_a09_c10", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A redundant dictionary is being described as a basis even though coefficients are not unique. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [10], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A redundant dictionary is being described as a basis even though coefficients are not unique."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A basis is independent and gives unique coordinates; a redundant nonunique dictionary is explicitly not one.", "slug": "basis"}], "normalized_requirement": "A redundant dictionary is labeled a basis even though its coefficients are not unique.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A redundant dictionary is labeled a basis even though its coefficients are not unique.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [10], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 7", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Computation, storage, sensing, control, or explanation depends on the number and quality of independent coordinates.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Computation, storage, sensing, control, or explanation depends on the number and quality of independent coordinates. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Computation, storage, sensing, control, or explanation depends on the number and quality of independent coordinates."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Computation, storage, sensing, control, or explanation depends on the number and quality of independent coordinates."}, {"display_text": "A basis change must preserve operators, uncertainty, units, and semantic meaning.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Merely reducing features or choosing a convenient representation does not solve the full problem because completeness, independence, reconstruction, and basis-change behavior remain ungoverned. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: A basis change must preserve operators, uncertainty, units, and semantic meaning. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [9], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A basis change must preserve operators, uncertainty, units, and semantic meaning.", "Merely reducing features or choosing a convenient representation does not solve the full problem because completeness, independence, reconstruction, and basis-change behavior remain ungoverned."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 9, "text": "A basis change must preserve operators, uncertainty, units, and semantic meaning."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 34, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-034", "ledger_sha256": "090217cb137717a3656942ba215bd6a6f173301895deff4f49ab5194e4331f3a"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Independent Generator Validation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:independent_generator_validation", "slug": "independent_generator_validation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 4, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 4 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system treats several candidates as separate contributors even though one or more may be reconstructed from the others under the relevant combination rule. The result is false dimensionality, unstable attribution, overconfident evidence, duplicated design axes, ill-conditioned models, nonunique coordinates, and fragile downstream control or explanation.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system treats several candidates as separate contributors even though one or more may be reconstructed from the others under the relevant combination rule. The result is false dimensionality, unstable attribution, overconfident evidence, duplicated design axes, ill-conditioned models, nonunique coordinates, and fragile downstream control or explanation."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P064-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must involve an inference, model, or decision downstream of a multi-member candidate collection.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A downstream reasoning process uses a collection of candidate contributors.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the each-member claim rather than concern only one selected member.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Every candidate member is treated as adding a degree of freedom.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail an independence assumption about incremental contribution, not mere multiplicity.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Each added degree of freedom is assumed to be independent of the others.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the absence of validation or establishment of the independence relation.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The asserted independence has not been validated.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Downstream reasoning assumes without validation that every candidate adds an independent degree of freedom.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A downstream inference treats every candidate as a distinct independent contributor without establishing independence.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P064-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Linear independence establishes rather than merely assumes that no candidate is generated by the others.", "slug": "linear_independence"}], "residual_id": "r:independent_generator_validation:b034_a10_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b034_a10_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Downstream reasoning assumes each member adds an independent degree of freedom. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Downstream reasoning assumes each member adds an independent degree of freedom."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Linear independence establishes rather than merely assumes that no candidate is generated by the others.", "slug": "linear_independence"}], "normalized_requirement": "Downstream reasoning assumes each candidate adds an independent degree of freedom without validation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Downstream reasoning assumes each candidate adds an independent degree of freedom without validation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P064-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must concern the multiplicity or count of members in a proposed contributor collection.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A candidate collection has a large raw member count.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail an evidential inference from count, not merely report a large collection.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The raw count is used as evidence for a substantive quality.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfies this branch only if the count is treated as evidence of diversity.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The inferred quality is diversity.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfies this branch only if the count is treated as evidence of coverage.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The inferred quality is coverage.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfies this branch only if the count is treated as evidence of robustness.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The inferred quality is robustness.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfies this branch only if the count is treated as evidence of explanatory richness.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The inferred quality is explanatory richness.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "A large candidate count is treated as evidence of diversity, coverage, robustness, or explanatory richness.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Raw candidate multiplicity is used as evidence for an independent-richness property.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P064-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Triangulation depends on method distinction and comparison, not on treating a large raw count as diversity.", "slug": "triangulation"}], "residual_id": "r:independent_generator_validation:b034_a10_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b034_a10_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Large candidate counts are being used as evidence of diversity, coverage, robustness, or explanatory richness. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Large candidate counts are being used as evidence of diversity, coverage, robustness, or explanatory richness."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Triangulation depends on method distinction and comparison, not on treating a large raw count as diversity.", "slug": "triangulation"}], "normalized_requirement": "A large candidate count is treated as evidence of diversity, coverage, robustness, or explanatory richness.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A large candidate count is treated as evidence of diversity, coverage, robustness, or explanatory richness.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P064-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O6", "O9"], ["O1", "O2", "O7", "O9"], ["O1", "O2", "O8", "O9"], ["O1", "O3", "O6", "O9"], ["O1", "O3", "O7", "O9"], ["O1", "O3", "O8", "O9"], ["O1", "O4", "O6", "O9"], ["O1", "O4", "O7", "O9"], ["O1", "O4", "O8", "O9"], ["O1", "O5", "O6", "O9"], ["O1", "O5", "O7", "O9"], ["O1", "O5", "O8", "O9"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must involve an output whose value depends on a multi-member generator, feature, or representation set.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A system derives an output from a candidate collection or representation.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfies these branches only when coefficients are the unstable outputs.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The affected output is a coefficient.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfies these branches only when attributions are the unstable outputs.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The affected output is an attribution.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfies these branches only when controls are the unstable outputs.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The affected output is a control.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfies these branches only when coordinates are the unstable outputs.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The affected output is a coordinate.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfies these branches only when addition is the perturbation associated with instability.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "A candidate is added to the collection.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfies these branches only when removal is the perturbation associated with instability.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "A candidate is removed from the collection.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfies these branches only when rescaling is the perturbation associated with instability.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "A candidate is rescaled within the collection.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must link the perturbation to output instability rather than merely mention both.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "The candidate perturbation makes the derived output unstable.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "A representation-dependent output becomes unstable when a candidate is added, removed, or rescaled.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A representation-dependent output is unstable under a candidate-set perturbation.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P064-C08-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid basis has unique coordinates; observed instability under candidate perturbation is evidence that the proposed representation may fail its conditions.", "slug": "basis"}], "residual_id": "r:independent_generator_validation:b034_a10_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b034_a10_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The result is false dimensionality, unstable attribution, overconfident evidence, duplicated design axes, ill-conditioned models, nonunique coordinates, and fragile downstream control or explanation. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Coefficients, attributions, controls, or coordinates become unstable when a candidate is added, removed, or rescaled.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Coefficients, attributions, controls, or coordinates become unstable when a candidate is added, removed, or rescaled.", "The result is false dimensionality, unstable attribution, overconfident evidence, duplicated design axes, ill-conditioned models, nonunique coordinates, and fragile downstream control or explanation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid basis has unique coordinates; observed instability under candidate perturbation is evidence that the proposed representation may fail its conditions.", "slug": "basis"}], "normalized_requirement": "Coefficients, attributions, controls, or coordinates become unstable when a candidate is added, removed, or rescaled.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Coefficients, attributions, controls, or coordinates become unstable when a candidate is added, removed, or rescaled.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P064-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must concern dimensions, components, or axes of a model, decomposition, matrix, or equivalent representation.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A representation contains multiple apparent dimensions.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an apparent multiplicity or dimensional richness rather than merely one dimension.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The representation appears high-dimensional.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require one or more duplicate-behaving dimensions without requiring that every dimension duplicates another.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "At least some apparent dimensions are implicated.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail duplicate or reconstructible behavior that undermines the apparent dimensional distinction.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Those dimensions behave as duplicates rather than distinct contributors.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "A representation appears high-dimensional while some dimensions behave as duplicates.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A representation's apparent dimensionality exceeds its behaviorally distinct dimensionality.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P064-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A basis excludes duplicate or derivable generators; apparent duplicates describe a failed candidate basis.", "slug": "basis"}], "residual_id": "r:independent_generator_validation:b034_a10_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b034_a10_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A model, decomposition, or matrix appears high-dimensional but behaves as if some dimensions are duplicates. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A model, decomposition, or matrix appears high-dimensional but behaves as if some dimensions are duplicates."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A basis excludes duplicate or derivable generators; apparent duplicates describe a failed candidate basis.", "slug": "basis"}], "normalized_requirement": "A representation appears high-dimensional while some dimensions behave as duplicates.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A representation appears high-dimensional while some dimensions behave as duplicates.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "DISJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A candidate set is about to be used as a basis, feature set, signal set, explanatory factor set, or design-dimension set.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: A candidate set is about to be used as a basis, feature set, signal set, explanatory factor set, or design-dimension set. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A candidate set is about to be used as a basis, feature set, signal set, explanatory factor set, or design-dimension set."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "A candidate set is about to be used as a basis, feature set, signal set, explanatory factor set, or design-dimension set."}, {"display_text": "The team must distinguish independence from span, correlation, mere difference, or institutional independence.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Independence makes a representation powerful because each retained member adds capacity, but proving independence requires a declared space, combination rule, and tolerance policy that may be more demanding than informal claims of difference. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: The team must distinguish independence from span, correlation, mere difference, or institutional independence. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The team must distinguish independence from span, correlation, mere difference, or institutional independence.", "Independence makes a representation powerful because each retained member adds capacity, but proving independence requires a declared space, combination rule, and tolerance policy that may be more demanding than informal claims of difference."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The team must distinguish independence from span, correlation, mere difference, or institutional independence."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 34, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-034", "ledger_sha256": "090217cb137717a3656942ba215bd6a6f173301895deff4f49ab5194e4331f3a"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Independent Verification Oversight", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:independent_verification_oversight", "slug": "independent_verification_oversight"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 2, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 3 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 2 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A team, vendor, model owner, institution, or decision-maker asserts that a design, result, process, product, or claim is valid, but the same party has incentives, habits, blind spots, or sunk costs that can distort verification. Without an independent oversight layer, weak evidence can be overread, inconvenient failures can be minimized, and stakeholders may accept a claim that has never been tested outside the producer’s own assumptions.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A team, vendor, model owner, institution, or decision-maker asserts that a design, result, process, product, or claim is valid, but the same party has incentives, habits, blind spots, or sunk costs that can distort verification. Without an independent oversight layer, weak evidence can be overread, inconvenient failures can be minimized, and stakeholders may accept a claim that has never been tested outside the producer’s own assumptions."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P064-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must identify the artifact producer as the party implicated in the validation relation.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A party produces the artifact being evaluated.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must link the verdict to validation of the same artifact or work product.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A validation verdict concerns that producer's artifact.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfies this branch only if the artifact producer controls the validation judgment.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The producer controls the validation verdict or its issuance.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfies this branch only if the artifact producer has a benefit tied to the validation judgment.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The producer benefits from the validation verdict.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "The artifact producer controls or benefits from the artifact's validation verdict.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An artifact producer has control over or a stake in its validation verdict.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P064-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Editorial independence is a positive separation norm and does not entail producer-controlled validation.", "slug": "editorial_independence"}], "residual_id": "r:independent_verification_oversight:b034_a11_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b034_a11_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The party producing the artifact also controls or benefits from the validation verdict. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The party producing the artifact also controls or benefits from the validation verdict."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Removing authorship, filtering authority, or the special cost of revision destroys the founder-blind-spot configuration, so no complete instance preserves the DSA while falsifying both source branches.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Founder Blind Spot", "one_liner": "The venture pattern where a thesis's originator, holding the authority to reroute disconfirming signals, systematically preserves their prior instead of revising it — because revision is uniquely expensive at the authoring seat.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:founder_blind_spot", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "founder_blind_spot"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "founder_blind_spot", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P064-C10-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every complete founder-blind-spot instance has an originator-produced thesis, disconfirming evidence bearing on that thesis, authority to reroute the evidence reaching the revision verdict, and an authorship-specific stake in preserving the prior."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The artifact producer controls or benefits from its validation verdict.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P064-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must include an external stakeholder role relevant to the artifact or validity claim without requiring that the stakeholder depends on the claim.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A user, regulator, customer, patient, investor, downstream team, or equivalent external stakeholder is relevant to the validity claim.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must relate an evidence body to support of a claim that an artifact or result is valid.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Evidence is offered or held as support for the validity claim.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail lack of direct evidence inspection access, not merely that inspection is difficult or optional.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The external stakeholder cannot directly inspect that supporting evidence.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Relevant external parties cannot directly inspect the evidence supporting a validity claim.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An external stakeholder lacks direct access to inspect validity evidence.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P064-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Verification does not require an external audience that lacks access to the underlying evidence.", "slug": "verification"}], "residual_id": "r:independent_verification_oversight:b034_a11_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b034_a11_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Users, regulators, customers, patients, investors, or downstream teams cannot directly inspect the validity evidence themselves. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Users, regulators, customers, patients, investors, or downstream teams cannot directly inspect the validity evidence themselves."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Verification does not require an external audience that lacks access to the underlying evidence.", "slug": "verification"}], "normalized_requirement": "Affected external parties cannot directly inspect the evidence supporting the validity claim.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Affected external parties cannot directly inspect the evidence supporting the validity claim.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P064-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must identify the artifact producer as the party implicated in the validation relation.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A party produces the artifact being evaluated.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must link the verdict to validation of the same artifact or work product.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A validation verdict concerns that producer's artifact.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfies this branch only if the artifact producer controls the validation judgment.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The producer controls the validation verdict or its issuance.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfies this branch only if the artifact producer has a benefit tied to the validation judgment.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The producer benefits from the validation verdict.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "The artifact producer controls or benefits from the artifact's validation verdict.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An artifact producer has control over or a stake in its validation verdict.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P064-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Editorial independence is a positive separation norm and does not entail producer-controlled validation.", "slug": "editorial_independence"}], "residual_id": "r:independent_verification_oversight:b034_a11_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b034_a11_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The party producing the artifact also controls or benefits from the validation verdict. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The party producing the artifact also controls or benefits from the validation verdict."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Removing authorship, filtering authority, or the special cost of revision destroys the founder-blind-spot configuration, so no complete instance preserves the DSA while falsifying both source branches.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Founder Blind Spot", "one_liner": "The venture pattern where a thesis's originator, holding the authority to reroute disconfirming signals, systematically preserves their prior instead of revising it — because revision is uniquely expensive at the authoring seat.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:founder_blind_spot", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "founder_blind_spot"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "founder_blind_spot", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P064-C10-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every complete founder-blind-spot instance has an originator-produced thesis, disconfirming evidence bearing on that thesis, authority to reroute the evidence reaching the revision verdict, and an authorship-specific stake in preserving the prior."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The artifact producer controls or benefits from its validation verdict.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P064-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O5", "O6", "O10"], ["O1", "O2", "O5", "O7", "O10"], ["O1", "O2", "O5", "O8", "O10"], ["O1", "O2", "O5", "O9", "O10"], ["O1", "O3", "O5", "O6", "O10"], ["O1", "O3", "O5", "O7", "O10"], ["O1", "O3", "O5", "O8", "O10"], ["O1", "O3", "O5", "O9", "O10"], ["O1", "O4", "O5", "O6", "O10"], ["O1", "O4", "O5", "O7", "O10"], ["O1", "O4", "O5", "O8", "O10"], ["O1", "O4", "O5", "O9", "O10"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a prior completed internal check rather than a prospective check.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The verification or signoff occurred before the present diagnosis.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfies these branches only when self-checking is the internal verification mechanism.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The prior mechanism was a producer self-check.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfies these branches only when internal QA is the verification mechanism.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The prior mechanism was internal quality assurance.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfies these branches only when builder signoff is the verification mechanism.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The prior mechanism was a builder signoff.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail an omission or miss by the completed internal verification.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The prior internal mechanism failed to detect the issue.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfies these branches only when a defect was missed.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The missed issue was a defect.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfies these branches only when overfitting was missed.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The missed issue was overfitting.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfies these branches only when an unstated or hidden assumption was missed.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The missed issue was a hidden assumption.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfies these branches only when a material scope exclusion was missed.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "The missed issue was a scope exclusion.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve material consequence or validity relevance of the missed issue.", "obligation_id": "O10", "statement": "The missed issue was consequential rather than immaterial.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "A prior producer-controlled verification mechanism has missed a consequential defect or validity limitation.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Prior internal verification has missed a consequential validity-relevant issue.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P064-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Verification can succeed and need not follow prior failed self-checks.", "slug": "verification"}], "residual_id": "r:independent_verification_oversight:b034_a11_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b034_a11_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Prior self-checks, internal QA, or builder signoffs have missed defects, overfitting, hidden assumptions, or scope exclusions. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Prior self-checks, internal QA, or builder signoffs have missed defects, overfitting, hidden assumptions, or scope exclusions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Verification can succeed and need not follow prior failed self-checks.", "slug": "verification"}], "normalized_requirement": "Prior internal checks or builder signoffs have missed consequential defects, overfitting, assumptions, or scope exclusions.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Prior internal checks or builder signoffs have missed consequential defects, overfitting, assumptions, or scope exclusions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "High-stakes acceptance depends on safety, correctness, compliance, efficacy, quality, security, fairness, or model reliability claims.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A team, vendor, model owner, institution, or decision-maker asserts that a design, result, process, product, or claim is valid, but the same party has incentives, habits, blind spots, or sunk costs that can distort verification. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: High-stakes acceptance depends on safety, correctness, compliance, efficacy, quality, security, fairness, or model reliability claims. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["High-stakes acceptance depends on safety, correctness, compliance, efficacy, quality, security, fairness, or model reliability claims.", "A team, vendor, model owner, institution, or decision-maker asserts that a design, result, process, product, or claim is valid, but the same party has incentives, habits, blind spots, or sunk costs that can distort verification."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "High-stakes acceptance depends on safety, correctness, compliance, efficacy, quality, security, fairness, or model reliability claims."}, {"display_text": "There is a known risk of confirmation bias, conflict of interest, sponsor pressure, vendor self-certification, or delivery-team optimism.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A team, vendor, model owner, institution, or decision-maker asserts that a design, result, process, product, or claim is valid, but the same party has incentives, habits, blind spots, or sunk costs that can distort verification. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: There is a known risk of confirmation bias, conflict of interest, sponsor pressure, vendor self-certification, or delivery-team optimism. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["There is a known risk of confirmation bias, conflict of interest, sponsor pressure, vendor self-certification, or delivery-team optimism.", "A team, vendor, model owner, institution, or decision-maker asserts that a design, result, process, product, or claim is valid, but the same party has incentives, habits, blind spots, or sunk costs that can distort verification."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "There is a known risk of confirmation bias, conflict of interest, sponsor pressure, vendor self-certification, or delivery-team optimism."}, {"display_text": "The evidence base is complex enough that independent expertise, replication, audit, or adversarial review can materially change confidence.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The archetype balances these by giving independent reviewers enough evidence access and decision leverage without turning verification into uninformed obstruction. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The evidence base is complex enough that independent expertise, replication, audit, or adversarial review can materially change confidence. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The evidence base is complex enough that independent expertise, replication, audit, or adversarial review can materially change confidence.", "The archetype balances these by giving independent reviewers enough evidence access and decision leverage without turning verification into uninformed obstruction."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The evidence base is complex enough that independent expertise, replication, audit, or adversarial review can materially change confidence."}, {"display_text": "Acceptance would create lock-in, public exposure, irreversible deployment, or large repair costs if validation is wrong.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Acceptance would create lock-in, public exposure, irreversible deployment, or large repair costs if validation is wrong. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Acceptance would create lock-in, public exposure, irreversible deployment, or large repair costs if validation is wrong."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "Acceptance would create lock-in, public exposure, irreversible deployment, or large repair costs if validation is wrong."}, {"display_text": "There is a need to distinguish genuine validation from marketing, compliance theater, or informal reassurance.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: There is a need to distinguish genuine validation from marketing, compliance theater, or informal reassurance. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["There is a need to distinguish genuine validation from marketing, compliance theater, or informal reassurance."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 8, "text": "There is a need to distinguish genuine validation from marketing, compliance theater, or informal reassurance."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 34, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-034", "ledger_sha256": "090217cb137717a3656942ba215bd6a6f173301895deff4f49ab5194e4331f3a"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Index-Based Retrieval", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:index_based_retrieval", "slug": "index_based_retrieval"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 2, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 1, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a mismatch between information existence and information accessibility. The relevant item is somewhere in the space, but the space has too many items, too little organization, too much vocabulary mismatch, or too few task-aligned access paths. Users therefore scan, ask around, rely on memory, duplicate work, or act without the record.\n\nThis problem gets worse when records have many plausible names, when different communities use different terms, when status changes over time, or when the right record depends on task context. A simple list or folder is often insufficient because it only supports one access path.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Information exists but is hard to locate because search space is large, unorganized, or poorly connected to user queries."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P064-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must distinguish the behavior from absence or non-creation of the information.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The relevant information already exists.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must link the existing information to the task, question, or decision for which it is needed.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The information is relevant to the people's task or decision.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail recurrence of the behavioral failure or workaround, not a one-off incident.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The specified behavior occurs repeatedly.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must entail direct non-retrieval of information that exists and is relevant.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "People fail to find the existing relevant information.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must entail requesting the information from others as a workaround for direct availability.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "People ask other people for the existing relevant information.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must entail duplicative recreation of information that already exists.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "People recreate the existing relevant information.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a candidate must entail decision-making that bypasses relevant information already in existence.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "People make decisions without using the existing relevant information.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Although relevant information exists, people repeatedly fail to find it, ask others for it, recreate it, or decide without it.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Existing relevant information repeatedly fails to become directly available or used through one of four specified behaviors.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P064-C13-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Search and retrieval describes the positive operation and can succeed; it does not require recurrent non-retrieval or recreation.", "slug": "search_and_retrieval"}], "residual_id": "r:index_based_retrieval:b034_a12_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b034_a12_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Relevant information exists but people repeatedly fail to find it, ask others for it, recreate it, or make decisions without it. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Relevant information exists but people repeatedly fail to find it, ask others for it, recreate it, or make decisions without it."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Without branch selection, a complete Mooers's-law instance may use guessing or doing without instead of asking a colleague; with the named substitute fixed to asking another person, one complete source branch necessarily holds.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Mooers's law", "one_liner": "The retrieval-system regularity that a system tends not to be used whenever having the information is more troublesome than not having it — adoption governed by the per-query cost-benefit ratio against a substitute, not the content's absolute value.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:mooerss_law", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O5"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "named_substitute_is_asking_another_person", "predicate": "The user's named substitute is asking another person for the needed information.", "rationale": "Publication-safety audit found no complete candidate-plus-qualifier instance that preserves the expression while falsifying the selected complete DNF branch."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "mooerss_law"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The user's named substitute is asking another person for the needed information."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "mooerss_law", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P064-C13-U1", "why_it_fits": "Mooers's law directly supplies existing relevant information, recurrent per-query non-use, and a named-substitute slot. Selecting its explicitly anchored asking-colleague substitute completes one source branch with one atomic guard."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Relevant information exists but is repeatedly not found, is recreated, or is bypassed in decisions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P064-C14", "dnf": [], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [], "predicate": "The collection is too large, distributed, dynamic, or poorly organized for practical exhaustive search.", "resolution": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RESIDUAL", "semantic_scope": "NON_ABSTRACTION", "structural_head": "Practical exhaustive search is infeasible under a limiting collection property.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P064-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An index can serve a small stable collection and does not entail that exhaustive search is impractical.", "slug": "index"}], "residual_id": "r:index_based_retrieval:b034_a12_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b034_a12_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The collection is too large, distributed, dynamic, or poorly organized for practical exhaustive search. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The collection is too large, distributed, dynamic, or poorly organized for practical exhaustive search."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RECLASSIFIED", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 1, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An index can serve a small stable collection and does not entail that exhaustive search is impractical.", "slug": "index"}], "normalized_requirement": "The collection is too large, distributed, dynamic, or disorganized for practical exhaustive search.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RECLASSIFIED", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later candidate-blind atomization classified this remainder as a threshold, parameter, materiality test, or other non-abstraction rather than a catalog gap."}, "predicate": "The collection is too large, distributed, dynamic, or disorganized for practical exhaustive search.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P064-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must include a searching or querying user role rather than only record creation.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Users express queries or retrieval needs.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must include a creator-side representation against which the query can be compared.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Record creators encode or describe records for retrieval.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfies this branch only if query terminology differs from creator-used terminology.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "User and creator vocabularies differ.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfies this branch only if the user's retrieval goal differs from the goal framing encoded by creators.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "User and creator goal framings differ.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfies this branch only if the user's context differs from the context represented by creators.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "User and creator contexts differ.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfies this branch only if examples used to express the query differ from examples used to represent records.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "User and creator examples differ.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Users query with representational cues different from those used by record creators.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "User query representation mismatches creator-supplied record representation.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P064-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Search and retrieval can operate with a shared controlled vocabulary and need not contain a creator-user mismatch.", "slug": "search_and_retrieval"}], "residual_id": "r:index_based_retrieval:b034_a12_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b034_a12_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Users search by different vocabularies, goals, contexts, or examples than the records’ creators used. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Users search by different vocabularies, goals, contexts, or examples than the records’ creators used."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Search and retrieval can operate with a shared controlled vocabulary and need not contain a creator-user mismatch.", "slug": "search_and_retrieval"}], "normalized_requirement": "Users query with vocabularies, goals, contexts, or examples different from those used by record creators.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Users query with vocabularies, goals, contexts, or examples different from those used by record creators.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P065-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must identify records or equivalent information objects as the items being accessed.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A collection contains records or equivalent information objects.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail the presence of multiple distinct access dimensions, not merely one key.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The records have more than one distinct access dimension.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must make the dimensions useful for locating or retrieving records rather than merely descriptive fields.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Those dimensions are useful for accessing the records.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Records have multiple useful access dimensions.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Records have multiple useful access dimensions.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P065-C01-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An index can expose a single access dimension; multidimensional access is not universally required.", "slug": "index"}], "residual_id": "r:index_based_retrieval:b034_a12_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b034_a12_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Records have multiple useful access dimensions, such as topic, owner, date, status, location, entity, dependency, or risk class. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Records have multiple useful access dimensions, such as topic, owner, date, status, location, entity, dependency, or risk class."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A collection with only one facet is excluded because the candidate's query-time mechanism explicitly combines the focal facet with other axes.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Retrieval Facet", "one_liner": "Expose one controlled descriptive dimension as an independently selectable and filterable axis whose values can be combined at query time with values selected on other axes.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:retrieval_facet", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "retrieval_facet"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "retrieval_facet", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P065-C01-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent adjudication confirms that every complete retrieval_facet instance entails the records, plural access dimensions, and access-use relation in the packet's sole DNF branch. No context qualifier is needed."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Although the dimensions are fused rather than independently filtered, each remains a distinct component of the browsable access string; the head does not require independent selection.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Precoordinated Heading", "one_liner": "Fuse topic, place, period, and form into one canonical subject string at indexing time so users retrieve by matching a whole browsable label, trading expressiveness and easy schema evolution for that browsability.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:precoordinated_heading", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "precoordinated_heading"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "precoordinated_heading", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P065-C01-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent adjudication confirms that every complete precoordinated_heading instance entails the records, plural access dimensions, and access-use relation in the packet's sole DNF branch. No context qualifier is needed."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Without the guard, a unary relation satisfies the DSA but lacks multiple access dimensions; with it, that counterexample is excluded.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Relational Model", "one_liner": "Organize data as typed sets of tuples queried by a small closed algebra of relation-to-relation operators, so any composition is itself a valid query, rewrites preserve meaning, and the logical schema is separated from physical storage.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:relational_model", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2"], "guard_type": "QUANTIFIER_BINDING", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "relation_has_multiple_queryable_attributes", "predicate": "The relation schema contains at least two attributes usable as query predicates.", "rationale": "The retained expression preserves the candidate's principal roles and relation. The single qualifier is candidate-anchored, atomic, sufficient for every gap in one complete DNF branch, and neither restates the head nor selects an unnamed favorable subtype."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "relational_model"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The relation schema contains at least two attributes usable as query predicates."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "relational_model", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P065-C01-U1", "why_it_fits": "Relations, tuples, typed attributes, and relational query operators supply the record and access spine. The one scalar guard—at least two attributes usable as query predicates—excludes unary schemas and fills only O2; it is anchored in the candidate schema, adds no principal role, and does not restate the head."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A topic-only tag list would be a counterexample, but the exact candidate requires separation from and combination with other retrieval axes.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Topic Facet", "one_liner": "Isolate what a resource is about as a single independently selectable axis in a faceted classification, so topical queries combine with place, time, and form filters at query time instead of being fused in advance into precoordinated compound headings.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:topic_facet", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "topic_facet"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "topic_facet", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P065-C01-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent adjudication confirms that every complete topic_facet instance entails the records, plural access dimensions, and access-use relation in the packet's sole DNF branch. No context qualifier is needed."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Whole-string browsing does not erase the distinct dimensions encoded by the subdivisions; it only fixes how they are combined.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Subject Heading String", "one_liner": "Assemble a main topical heading with an ordered sequence of controlled subdivisions — topical, geographic, chronological, form — into one concatenated string at indexing time, eagerly committing a multi-facet intersection as a single citable, browsable, retrievable token.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:compound_heading_string", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "compound_heading_string"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "compound_heading_string", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P065-C01-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent adjudication confirms that every complete compound_heading_string instance entails the records, plural access dimensions, and access-use relation in the packet's sole DNF branch. No context qualifier is needed."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A merely descriptive, non-queryable method note would fail O3, but the exact candidate requires the method field to be filterable.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Method-as-Metadata", "one_liner": "The cataloging move of recording how a resource was produced or what procedure it employs as a first-class, controlled-vocabulary field — orthogonal to topic, creator, date, and form — so a corpus becomes filterable by technique without reading each item.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:method_as_metadata", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "method_as_metadata"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "method_as_metadata", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P065-C01-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent adjudication confirms that every complete method_as_metadata instance entails the records, plural access dimensions, and access-use relation in the packet's sole DNF branch. No context qualifier is needed."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A bare deviation note with only one undifferentiated access key would falsify the unit, but it is not a complete reference_deviation instance: the exact pattern requires the four roles to be composed in the assertion and made directly queryable.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Abnormal Quality", "one_liner": "Record an observed property not as a bare measurement but as a four-role assertion — bearer, quality, reference state, and deviation judgment — so that departures from expectation become directly queryable across heterogeneous traits.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:reference_deviation", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "reference_deviation"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "reference_deviation", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P065-C01-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every complete exact instance is a structured, queryable record containing multiple separately encoded roles. Those roles are useful retrieval dimensions, so the records–plural dimensions–access relation is universally present without a qualifier."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A lone location field would not suffice, but this exact candidate embeds place among independently combinable retrieval axes.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Geographic Facet", "one_liner": "Treat spatial location as a separable description axis in a faceted catalog — assigning place independently of topic, form, and period, and binding it to a controlled place authority so the same location is referenced consistently and can be filtered on its own.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:geographic_facet", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "geographic_facet"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "geographic_facet", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P065-C01-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent adjudication confirms that every complete geographic_facet instance entails the records, plural access dimensions, and access-use relation in the packet's sole DNF branch. No context qualifier is needed."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Qualifiers cannot stand alone, but the head requires useful access dimensions, not independently sufficient access keys; descriptor and aspect jointly constrain retrieval.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Aspect Qualifier", "one_liner": "Attach a controlled modifier from a small closed list to a subject descriptor so the indexed claim names a topic in one specific sense — Aspirin/adverse effects, not aspirin-as-such — factoring topic from aspect to gain precision without vocabulary bloat.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:aspect_qualifier", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "aspect_qualifier"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "aspect_qualifier", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P065-C01-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent adjudication confirms that every complete aspect_qualifier instance entails the records, plural access dimensions, and access-use relation in the packet's sole DNF branch. No context qualifier is needed."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A vocabulary with only one controlled list would fail O2, but the exact candidate requires multiple independent axes.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Faceted Vocabulary", "one_liner": "Describe a referent by selecting one value per orthogonal, independently combinable axis (material, period, function) instead of matching a single precoordinated heading, so N facets of M values express an N×M space while you maintain only the sum of the value lists.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:faceted_vocabulary", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "faceted_vocabulary"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "faceted_vocabulary", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P065-C01-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent adjudication confirms that every complete faceted_vocabulary instance entails the records, plural access dimensions, and access-use relation in the packet's sole DNF branch. No context qualifier is needed."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A non-filterable format note would fail O3, but the exact form-facet definition requires independent joint filtering.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Form Facet", "one_liner": "Reserve one classification axis in a faceted catalog for genre, document type, or format — assigned independently of topic — so 'what kind of object is this' and 'what is it about' become separate, combinable filters.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:form_facet", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "form_facet"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "form_facet", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P065-C01-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent adjudication confirms that every complete form_facet instance entails the records, plural access dimensions, and access-use relation in the packet's sole DNF branch. No context qualifier is needed."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Records require several useful access dimensions such as topic, owner, date, status, location, entity, dependency, or risk.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Retrieval errors create material cost: duplicated work, missed obligations, unsafe decisions, inconsistent guidance, or lost learning.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when relevant records, examples, policies, cases, obligations, components, or sources exist but are repeatedly missed, recreated, or found only through informal memory. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Retrieval errors create material cost: duplicated work, missed obligations, unsafe decisions, inconsistent guidance, or lost learning. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Retrieval errors create material cost: duplicated work, missed obligations, unsafe decisions, inconsistent guidance, or lost learning.", "Use this archetype when relevant records, examples, policies, cases, obligations, components, or sources exist but are repeatedly missed, recreated, or found only through informal memory."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Retrieval errors create material cost: duplicated work, missed obligations, unsafe decisions, inconsistent guidance, or lost learning."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 34, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-034", "ledger_sha256": "090217cb137717a3656942ba215bd6a6f173301895deff4f49ab5194e4331f3a"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Inductive Validity Extension", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:inductive_validity_extension", "slug": "inductive_validity_extension"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is unsupported extension. A claim is valid in one case, or a small set of cases, and that local success is treated as evidence for a much larger sequence. The missing link is the propagation rule: why should validity at one step imply validity at the next?\n\nThis problem often hides behind plausible language. A pilot “worked.” A workflow is “standard.” A formula was “proved for the first case.” A training module “prepares learners for the next level.” These statements may be true locally while still failing when extended.\n\nThe recurring risk is that later steps introduce new conditions: larger scale, different populations, deeper recursion, changed context, accumulated error, hidden edge cases, or shifted meanings of the invariant.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A claim, process, rule, guarantee, or design is treated as valid across many steps, cases, scales, or recursive applications even though only the initial case or a few examples have been verified."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact relation moves from observed instances to a projected generalization beyond the premises.", "role_mapping": "Initial cases -> observed sample; extension -> projected generalization.", "slug": "inductive_reasoning", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b034_a13_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A rule is being extended from one case to many cases, from a pilot to a rollout, from a small scale to a larger scale, or from a first step to a repeated sequence. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A rule is being extended from one case to many cases, from a pilot to a rollout, from a small scale to a larger scale, or from a first step to a repeated sequence."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Inductive Reasoning", "one_liner": "Specific to general inference.", "page_ref": "prime:inductive_reasoning", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Initial cases -> observed sample; extension -> projected generalization.", "slug": "inductive_reasoning", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact relation moves from observed instances to a projected generalization beyond the premises."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "An observed case or limited set of cases is used to project a rule to unexamined cases or a broader class.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The inductive step derives the property at an element from its well-founded predecessors.", "role_mapping": "Predecessor step -> induction hypothesis; next step -> inductive conclusion.", "slug": "mathematical_induction", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b034_a13_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The process is recursive, iterative, staged, or otherwise self-similar enough that one step is used to justify the next. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The process is recursive, iterative, staged, or otherwise self-similar enough that one step is used to justify the next."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Mathematical Induction", "one_liner": "Proof method across natural numbers.", "page_ref": "prime:mathematical_induction", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Predecessor step -> induction hypothesis; next step -> inductive conclusion.", "slug": "mathematical_induction", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The inductive step derives the property at an element from its well-founded predecessors."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A recursive, iterative, staged, or self-similar process uses the validity of predecessor steps to justify the next.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The proof establishes one property universally across the well-founded domain rather than only at an endpoint or on average.", "role_mapping": "Every-step property -> universal predicate P over the domain.", "slug": "mathematical_induction", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b034_a13_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A guarantee must remain true at every step, not merely on average or at the final output. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A guarantee must remain true at every step, not merely on average or at the final output."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Mathematical Induction", "one_liner": "Proof method across natural numbers.", "page_ref": "prime:mathematical_induction", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Every-step property -> universal predicate P over the domain.", "slug": "mathematical_induction", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The proof establishes one property universally across the well-founded domain rather than only at an endpoint or on average."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A property must remain true at every step of a well-founded repeated process.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact method proves a universal predicate across natural numbers or another well-founded recursive domain.", "role_mapping": "All cases or stages -> universal closure over a well-founded domain.", "slug": "mathematical_induction", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b034_a13_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A mathematical, software, policy, training, or operational claim is asserted for all n, all stages, all cases in a class, or every repeated transition. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A mathematical, software, policy, training, or operational claim is asserted for all n, all stages, all cases in a class, or every repeated transition."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Mathematical Induction", "one_liner": "Proof method across natural numbers.", "page_ref": "prime:mathematical_induction", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "All cases or stages -> universal closure over a well-founded domain.", "slug": "mathematical_induction", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact method proves a universal predicate across natural numbers or another well-founded recursive domain."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A claim is asserted for every natural-number case, stage, recursively constructed case, or repeated transition.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The cost of discovering a failed extension late is high enough to justify explicit validation before expansion.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The cost of discovering a failed extension late is high enough to justify explicit validation before expansion. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The cost of discovering a failed extension late is high enough to justify explicit validation before expansion."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The cost of discovering a failed extension late is high enough to justify explicit validation before expansion."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 34, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-034", "ledger_sha256": "090217cb137717a3656942ba215bd6a6f173301895deff4f49ab5194e4331f3a"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Inertia Breaking", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:inertia_breaking", "slug": "inertia_breaking"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 5, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 3, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 7 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 3 of 5 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 7}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is state persistence. A current state continues because staying in place is easier, safer, more coordinated, or more familiar than beginning a transition. The desirable future state may have higher long-term value, but the immediate local incentives favor the old state.\n\nCommon sources of inertia include operational friction, sunk costs, procedural approvals, habit, uncertainty, fear of short-term loss, incompatible infrastructure, social identity, first-mover risk, and the absence of a clear start condition. The system may talk about change while preserving the practical arrangements that make change hard.\n\nThis is different from simple disagreement. People may agree with the change and still fail to start. It is also different from ordinary diffusion: nothing can diffuse widely if the first movement has not yet become credible.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system persists in its current state even though a better, safer, more efficient, or more appropriate state is available. The persistence is produced by momentum, habit, coordination barriers, risk, sunk cost, defaults, uncertainty, installed infrastructure, approval friction, or lack of a credible first move."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Inertia is value-neutral and can exist without a known improvement, proposal, or repeated failed start.", "slug": "inertia"}], "residual_id": "r:inertia_breaking:b034_a14_c1", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b034_a14_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A known improvement, migration, reform, or behavior change repeatedly fails to start. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A known improvement, migration, reform, or behavior change repeatedly fails to start."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Inertia is value-neutral and can exist without a known improvement, proposal, or repeated failed start.", "slug": "inertia"}], "normalized_requirement": "A proposed improvement or change repeatedly fails to initiate.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A proposed improvement or change repeatedly fails to initiate.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The force-response relation states that small forces produce small changes and may remain below mobilization.", "role_mapping": "Small attempts -> small applied force; dissipated change -> sub-mobilization response.", "slug": "inertia", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b034_a14_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Small attempts at change dissipate before becoming a visible trajectory. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Small attempts at change dissipate before becoming a visible trajectory."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Inertia", "one_liner": "Resistance to change.", "page_ref": "prime:inertia", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Small attempts -> small applied force; dissipated change -> sub-mobilization response.", "slug": "inertia", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The force-response relation states that small forces produce small changes and may remain below mobilization."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Small applied change efforts produce too little response to establish a new trajectory.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P065-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must involve multiple stakeholders or equivalent potential first movers.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Multiple stakeholders are positioned to act on a change.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve actual shared assent rather than merely possible agreement.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The stakeholders support the change in principle.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail absence of an initiating action despite shared assent.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "No stakeholder takes the first meaningful step toward the change.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must concern failure to initiate rather than failure after implementation begins.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The missing action is the first meaningful step in the change sequence.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "Stakeholders agree on a change in principle, yet none initiates a meaningful first step.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Shared support for change produces no first mover.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P065-C02-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Inertia does not require multiple stakeholders, agreement in principle, or a first-mover problem.", "slug": "inertia"}], "residual_id": "r:inertia_breaking:b034_a14_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b034_a14_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Stakeholders agree in principle but no one takes the first meaningful step. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders agree in principle but no one takes the first meaningful step."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Inertia does not require multiple stakeholders, agreement in principle, or a first-mover problem.", "slug": "inertia"}], "normalized_requirement": "Stakeholders agree on a change in principle but none takes the first meaningful step.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Stakeholders agree on a change in principle but none takes the first meaningful step.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P065-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must include at least two actors rather than one isolated decision-maker.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Multiple actors can undertake the relevant movement.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail an actual mutual-waiting state rather than only interdependent payoffs.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The actors wait for corresponding movement by one another.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the disadvantage of unilateral movement.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Movement without corresponding action by others is unattractive.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must link the waiting state to unattractive unilateral movement in the stated direction.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The actors' mutual waiting makes unilateral movement unattractive.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Multiple actors wait for one another, making unilateral movement unattractive.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Mutual waiting among multiple actors makes unilateral movement unattractive.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P065-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Strategic complementarity makes aligned action more valuable as others act, but does not require that actors currently wait or occupy the low-action equilibrium.", "slug": "strategic_complementarity"}], "residual_id": "r:inertia_breaking:b034_a14_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b034_a14_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Multiple actors wait for one another, making unilateral movement unattractive. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Multiple actors wait for one another, making unilateral movement unattractive."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Strategic complementarity makes aligned action more valuable as others act, but does not require that actors currently wait or occupy the low-action equilibrium.", "slug": "strategic_complementarity"}], "normalized_requirement": "Multiple actors wait for one another because unilateral movement is unattractive.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Multiple actors wait for one another because unilateral movement is unattractive.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime is the forward-looking cost asymmetry in which switching is costlier than staying.", "role_mapping": "Current default -> locked state; costly switch -> migration cost; staying -> continuation cost.", "slug": "lock_in", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b034_a14_c3a", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The current state remains the default because switching is confusing, costly, risky, or socially unsupported. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The current state remains the default because switching is confusing, costly, risky, or socially unsupported."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Lock-In", "one_liner": "Forward-looking cost of switching exceeds the forward-looking cost of staying, even when a superior alternative exists.", "page_ref": "prime:lock_in", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Current default -> locked state; costly switch -> migration cost; staying -> continuation cost.", "slug": "lock_in", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime is the forward-looking cost asymmetry in which switching is costlier than staying."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The current state persists because forward switching costs exceed the cost of continuation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The force-response relation states that small forces produce small changes and may remain below mobilization.", "role_mapping": "Small attempts -> small applied force; dissipated change -> sub-mobilization response.", "slug": "inertia", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b034_a14_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Small attempts at change dissipate before becoming a visible trajectory. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Small attempts at change dissipate before becoming a visible trajectory."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Inertia", "one_liner": "Resistance to change.", "page_ref": "prime:inertia", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Small attempts -> small applied force; dissipated change -> sub-mobilization response.", "slug": "inertia", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The force-response relation states that small forces produce small changes and may remain below mobilization."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Small applied change efforts produce too little response to establish a new trajectory.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The condition supplies past investment and the resulting felt barrier to reversal.", "role_mapping": "Past investments -> sunk expenditure; expensive-feeling reversal -> psychological barrier.", "slug": "sunk_cost_and_irreversible_commitment", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b034_a14_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Past investments, routines, contracts, skills, identity, or infrastructure make reversal or transition feel expensive. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Past investments, routines, contracts, skills, identity, or infrastructure make reversal or transition feel expensive."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Sunk Cost and Irreversible Commitment", "one_liner": "Expended resources create psychological barriers to reversal.", "page_ref": "prime:sunk_cost_and_irreversible_commitment", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Past investments -> sunk expenditure; expensive-feeling reversal -> psychological barrier.", "slug": "sunk_cost_and_irreversible_commitment", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The condition supplies past investment and the resulting felt barrier to reversal."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Past expenditure or commitment creates a psychological barrier to reversal.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B5", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact relation is a minimum initiating input that crosses a barrier before the favorable process proceeds under its own momentum.", "role_mapping": "Catalytic start -> minimum input; stalled state -> barrier; later feedback -> post-threshold momentum.", "slug": "activation_energy", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b034_a14_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The system needs a catalytic starting condition before ordinary feedback or diffusion can take over. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The system needs a catalytic starting condition before ordinary feedback or diffusion can take over."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Activation Energy", "one_liner": "The minimum input that must be supplied to push a thermodynamically favorable but stalled process past a barrier before momentum carries it to completion.", "page_ref": "prime:activation_energy", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Catalytic start -> minimum input; stalled state -> barrier; later feedback -> post-threshold momentum.", "slug": "activation_energy", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact relation is a minimum initiating input that crosses a barrier before the favorable process proceeds under its own momentum."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A stalled process requires a concentrated initiating input to cross a barrier before ordinary momentum or feedback can carry it.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 5", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 34, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-034", "ledger_sha256": "090217cb137717a3656942ba215bd6a6f173301895deff4f49ab5194e4331f3a"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Inertia Harnessing", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:inertia_harnessing", "slug": "inertia_harnessing"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a mismatch between the need for sustained continuation and the scarcity of repeated active effort. A beneficial action exists, but it sits outside the ordinary path of work, choice, or habit. Meanwhile, other paths continue automatically because they are defaulted, routinized, embedded, familiar, socially reinforced, or technically preconfigured.\n\nThe result is predictable drop-off. The system does not necessarily reject the desired behavior; it simply does not carry it. Inertia continues to carry the old path because that path has lower friction, stronger cues, or more established ownership.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A desired behavior, process, maintenance action, or state requires repeated effort to sustain, while existing habits, defaults, workflows, or trajectories already carry other behavior forward."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P065-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the action's desired status rather than intended cessation.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The action is desired.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail failure of continued action rather than only difficult initiation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The desired action is not sustained over time.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must make recurrent renewed initiative necessary for continuation and responsible for non-sustenance.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Dependence on repeated initiative causes the continuation failure.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "A desired action is not sustained because continuation depends on repeated initiative.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Dependence on repeated initiative prevents a desired action from being sustained.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P065-C04-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P065-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the action's desired status rather than intended cessation.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The action is desired.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail failure of continued action rather than only difficult initiation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The desired action is not sustained over time.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must make active recurring remembering necessary for continuation and responsible for non-sustenance.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Dependence on repeated remembering causes the continuation failure.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "A desired action is not sustained because continuation depends on repeated remembering.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Dependence on repeated remembering prevents a desired action from being sustained.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P065-C04-U2"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P065-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the action's desired status rather than intended cessation.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The action is desired.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail failure of continued action rather than only difficult initiation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The desired action is not sustained over time.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must make recurrent persuasion necessary for continuation and responsible for non-sustenance.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Dependence on repeated persuasion causes the continuation failure.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "A desired action is not sustained because continuation depends on repeated persuasion.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Dependence on repeated persuasion prevents a desired action from being sustained.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P065-C04-U3"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P065-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the action's desired status rather than intended cessation.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The action is desired.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail failure of continued action rather than only difficult initiation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The desired action is not sustained over time.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must make recurring managerial pressure necessary for continuation and responsible for non-sustenance.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Dependence on repeated managerial pressure causes the continuation failure.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "A desired action is not sustained because continuation depends on repeated managerial pressure.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Dependence on repeated managerial pressure prevents a desired action from being sustained.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P065-C04-U4"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Habit describes learned automatic behavior but does not entail failure to sustain a different desirable action.", "slug": "habit"}], "residual_id": "r:inertia_harnessing:b034_a15_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b034_a15_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A desirable action is not being sustained because it depends on repeated initiative, memory, persuasion, or managerial pressure. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A desirable action is not being sustained because it depends on repeated initiative, memory, persuasion, or managerial pressure."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 4, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 4}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Habit describes learned automatic behavior but does not entail failure to sustain a different desirable action.", "slug": "habit"}], "normalized_requirement": "A desired action is not sustained because it depends on repeated initiative, memory, persuasion, or managerial pressure.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 4 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A desired action is not sustained because it depends on repeated initiative, memory, persuasion, or managerial pressure.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Default persistence and momentum are mandatory components of the exact inertia structure.", "role_mapping": "Routine or default -> current state; stable continuation -> persistence and momentum.", "slug": "inertia", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b034_a15_c2a", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The system already has stable routines, defaults, workflows, rhythms, cues, or momentum that could carry the desired action if aligned correctly. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The system already has stable routines, defaults, workflows, rhythms, cues, or momentum that could carry the desired action if aligned correctly."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Inertia", "one_liner": "Resistance to change.", "page_ref": "prime:inertia", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Routine or default -> current state; stable continuation -> persistence and momentum.", "slug": "inertia", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Default persistence and momentum are mandatory components of the exact inertia structure."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The system contains a stable routine, default, workflow, rhythm, or trajectory that persists without repeated re-initiation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Resistance to change and the force required per unit change are the prime's central relation.", "role_mapping": "Established trajectory -> current state; required effort -> inertial resistance.", "slug": "inertia", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b034_a15_c3a", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Directly breaking inertia would be costly, resisted, unnecessary, or more disruptive than redirecting existing continuation forces. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Directly breaking inertia would be costly, resisted, unnecessary, or more disruptive than redirecting existing continuation forces."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Inertia", "one_liner": "Resistance to change.", "page_ref": "prime:inertia", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Established trajectory -> current state; required effort -> inertial resistance.", "slug": "inertia", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Resistance to change and the force required per unit change are the prime's central relation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Changing the established trajectory directly requires substantial force because it resists change.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The desired path can be made easier without hiding important choices or removing legitimate alternatives.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A beneficial action exists, but it sits outside the ordinary path of work, choice, or habit. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: The desired path can be made easier without hiding important choices or removing legitimate alternatives. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The desired path can be made easier without hiding important choices or removing legitimate alternatives.", "A beneficial action exists, but it sits outside the ordinary path of work, choice, or habit."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The desired path can be made easier without hiding important choices or removing legitimate alternatives."}, {"display_text": "The intervention can be monitored for drift, misuse, complacency, and unintended lock-in.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this deployment constraint: The intervention can be monitored for drift, misuse, complacency, and unintended lock-in. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The intervention can be monitored for drift, misuse, complacency, and unintended lock-in."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The intervention can be monitored for drift, misuse, complacency, and unintended lock-in."}, {"display_text": "The current trajectory is not so harmful that immediate interruption, containment, or reversal is required.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: The current trajectory is not so harmful that immediate interruption, containment, or reversal is required. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The current trajectory is not so harmful that immediate interruption, containment, or reversal is required."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The current trajectory is not so harmful that immediate interruption, containment, or reversal is required."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 34, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-034", "ledger_sha256": "090217cb137717a3656942ba215bd6a6f173301895deff4f49ab5194e4331f3a"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Inflation, Currency, and Real versus Nominal Adjustment", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:inflation_currency_and_real_versus_nominal_adjustment", "slug": "inflation_currency_and_real_versus_nominal_adjustment"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 5, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 2, "statement": "0 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 5 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is hidden basis mismatch. Monetary values appear to be commensurable, but a nominal amount in one year is not automatically equivalent to the same nominal amount in another year; a local-currency gain is not automatically a home-currency gain; and a real cash-flow projection cannot be validly discounted with a nominal rate. Without an explicit reference basis, stakeholders may mistake inflation, exchange movement, or reporting convention for substantive gain, loss, affordability, or performance.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Decision makers compare monetary amounts that are nominally similar but structurally incomparable because they arise in different years, currencies, inflation regimes, or discounting bases. The apparent difference may be caused by purchasing-power erosion, exchange translation, rate-basis mismatch, or reporting conventions rather than substantive economic change."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P065-C05", "dnf": [], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [], "predicate": "The analysis compares costs, wages, revenue, benefits, or returns across multiple years.", "resolution": "SOURCE_DEFECT", "semantic_scope": "SOURCE_DEFECT", "structural_head": "Cross-year monetary comparison without a stated purchasing-power-basis defect.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P065-C05-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Present-value discounting adjusts for time value but does not necessarily adjust price-level inflation or establish a common consumption basket.", "slug": "discounting_present_value"}], "residual_id": "r:inflation_currency_and_real_versus_nominal_adjustment:b035_a01_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b035_a01_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The analysis compares costs, wages, revenue, benefits, or returns across multiple years. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The analysis compares costs, wages, revenue, benefits, or returns across multiple years."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "SOURCE_REVIEW_REQUIRED", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 1, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Present-value discounting adjusts for time value but does not necessarily adjust price-level inflation or establish a common consumption basket.", "slug": "discounting_present_value"}], "normalized_requirement": "Costs, wages, revenue, benefits, or returns are compared across years without a shared purchasing-power basis.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "SOURCE_REVIEW_REQUIRED", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later candidate-blind atomization found that the source wording lacks a relation required by its diagnostic reading, so this is a source-repair issue rather than evidence of a missing abstraction."}, "predicate": "Costs, wages, revenue, benefits, or returns are compared across years without a shared purchasing-power basis.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P065-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require the commitment to persist across more than one price-level period.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A financial commitment spans multiple periods.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve possible material price-level change rather than require realized inflation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Aggregate price levels may change materially during those periods.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must apply the price-level exposure to a project.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The commitment can be a project.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must apply the price-level exposure to a contract.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The commitment can be a contract.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must apply the price-level exposure to a pension.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The commitment can be a pension.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must apply the price-level exposure to a salary.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The commitment can be a salary.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must apply the price-level exposure to a public budget.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The commitment can be a public budget.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "A project, contract, pension, salary, or public budget spans periods in which aggregate price levels may change materially.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A long-lived financial commitment is exposed to possible material price-level change.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P065-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Time value can exist with stable prices, while inflation exposure requires a changing price level and specified basket.", "slug": "time_value_of_money"}], "residual_id": "r:inflation_currency_and_real_versus_nominal_adjustment:b035_a01_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b035_a01_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A project, contract, pension, salary, or public budget spans periods where price levels may change materially. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A project, contract, pension, salary, or public budget spans periods where price levels may change materially."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Time value can exist with stable prices, while inflation exposure requires a changing price level and specified basket.", "slug": "time_value_of_money"}], "normalized_requirement": "A long-lived financial commitment spans periods in which aggregate price levels may change materially.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A long-lived financial commitment spans periods in which aggregate price levels may change materially.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P065-C07", "dnf": [], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [], "predicate": "Values are reported in different currencies.", "resolution": "SOURCE_DEFECT", "semantic_scope": "SOURCE_DEFECT", "structural_head": "Cross-currency reporting without a stated conclusion-change relation.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P065-C07-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P065-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must include both home-currency and local-currency representations of related values.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Related monetary values are evaluated in home-currency and local-currency views.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail divergent conclusions between the home-currency and local-currency views.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The two currency views yield different conclusions.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "A home-currency view and local-currency view lead to different conclusions.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Home- and local-currency views yield different conclusions.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P065-C07-U2"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Arbitrage can occur without reporting-currency translation or divergent home- and local-currency conclusions.", "slug": "arbitrage_finance"}], "residual_id": "r:inflation_currency_and_real_versus_nominal_adjustment:b035_a01_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b035_a01_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Values are reported in different currencies, or a home-currency view and local-currency view lead to different conclusions. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Values are reported in different currencies, or a home-currency view and local-currency view lead to different conclusions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "SOURCE_REVIEW_REQUIRED", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 1, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Arbitrage can occur without reporting-currency translation or divergent home- and local-currency conclusions.", "slug": "arbitrage_finance"}], "normalized_requirement": "Currency denomination or translation changes the conclusion drawn from otherwise related values.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "SOURCE_REVIEW_REQUIRED", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later candidate-blind atomization found that the source wording lacks a relation required by its diagnostic reading, so this is a source-repair issue rather than evidence of a missing abstraction."}, "predicate": "Currency denomination or translation changes the conclusion drawn from otherwise related values.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P065-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"], ["O1", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must concern a valuation relation between cash flows and discount rates.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A valuation pairs cash flows with discount rates.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete branch must entail this real-flow and nominal-rate mismatch.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Real cash flows are paired with nominal discount rates.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete branch must entail this nominal-flow and real-rate mismatch.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Nominal cash flows are paired with real discount rates.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "A discounted cash-flow valuation pairs real cash flows with nominal discount rates or nominal cash flows with real discount rates.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A valuation mismatches the real or nominal basis of cash flows and discount rates.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P065-C08-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Discounting can consistently pair real flows with real rates or nominal flows with nominal rates; the prime does not entail this mismatch.", "slug": "discounting_present_value"}], "residual_id": "r:inflation_currency_and_real_versus_nominal_adjustment:b035_a01_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b035_a01_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A discounted cash-flow model mixes real cash flows with nominal discount rates or nominal cash flows with real discount rates. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A discounted cash-flow model mixes real cash flows with nominal discount rates or nominal cash flows with real discount rates."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Discounting can consistently pair real flows with real rates or nominal flows with nominal rates; the prime does not entail this mismatch.", "slug": "discounting_present_value"}], "normalized_requirement": "A valuation mixes real cash flows with nominal discount rates or nominal cash flows with real discount rates.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A valuation mixes real cash flows with nominal discount rates or nominal cash flows with real discount rates.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P065-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must compare nominal monetary amounts from distinct historical periods.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Monetary face values are compared across historical periods.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail omission of a real purchasing-power interpretation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The comparison does not explain the values' purchasing power.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail omission of the basket against which purchasing power is measured.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The comparison does not specify the relevant cost basket.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail omission of the time basis for normalization.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The comparison does not specify a reference period.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "A historical monetary comparison uses face values without specifying purchasing power, the cost basket, or the reference period.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A historical face-value comparison omits its real-value basis.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P065-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Nominal-versus-actual control concerns command and implementation, not nominal money versus real purchasing power.", "slug": "nominal_vs_actual_control"}], "residual_id": "r:inflation_currency_and_real_versus_nominal_adjustment:b035_a01_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b035_a01_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Historical comparisons use face values without explaining purchasing power, cost basket, or reference period. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Historical comparisons use face values without explaining purchasing power, cost basket, or reference period."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Nominal-versus-actual control concerns command and implementation, not nominal money versus real purchasing power.", "slug": "nominal_vs_actual_control"}], "normalized_requirement": "Historical monetary comparisons use face values without specifying purchasing power, basket, or reference period.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Historical monetary comparisons use face values without specifying purchasing power, basket, or reference period.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B5", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P065-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must identify a stakeholder who could make the contemplated presentation without requiring that it occurs.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A stakeholder is positioned to present performance information.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must concern the potential conflation of nominal monetary increase with real purchasing-power increase.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The contemplated presentation would frame nominal gain as real gain.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve possible stakeholder benefit without requiring actual benefit or actual presentation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The stakeholder may benefit from making that presentation.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "A stakeholder may benefit from presenting nominal gains as real gains.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Presenting nominal gain as real gain may benefit a stakeholder.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P065-C10-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P065-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must identify a stakeholder who could make the contemplated presentation without requiring that it occurs.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A stakeholder is positioned to present performance information.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must concern potential attribution of exchange translation effects to underlying operational results.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The contemplated presentation would frame currency translation effects as operating performance.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve possible stakeholder benefit without requiring actual benefit or actual presentation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The stakeholder may benefit from making that presentation.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "A stakeholder may benefit from presenting currency translation effects as operating performance.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Presenting currency translation as operating performance may benefit a stakeholder.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P065-C10-U2"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Nominal-versus-actual control does not entail monetary inflation, currency translation, or strategically misleading performance presentation.", "slug": "nominal_vs_actual_control"}], "residual_id": "r:inflation_currency_and_real_versus_nominal_adjustment:b035_a01_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b035_a01_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Stakeholders may benefit from presenting nominal gains as real gains, or currency translation effects as operational performance. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders may benefit from presenting nominal gains as real gains, or currency translation effects as operational performance."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 2, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 2}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Nominal-versus-actual control does not entail monetary inflation, currency translation, or strategically misleading performance presentation.", "slug": "nominal_vs_actual_control"}], "normalized_requirement": "Interested stakeholders present nominal gains as real gains or translation effects as operating performance.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 2 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Interested stakeholders present nominal gains as real gains or translation effects as operating performance.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 5", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 35, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-035", "ledger_sha256": "b2d9cb6a58efe93b2206285661de58066df05438ebedb6523fd83adb353705b9"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Informal Fallacy Diagnosis and Repair", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:informal_fallacy_diagnosis_and_repair", "slug": "informal_fallacy_diagnosis_and_repair"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 4, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 5 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 4 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Actors accept, reject, or attack arguments using surface plausibility or named-fallacy labels without showing whether the inference actually fails in form, premise acceptability, relevance, context, category stability, comparison class, burden of proof, or normative warrant.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Actors accept, reject, or attack arguments using surface plausibility or named-fallacy labels without showing whether the inference actually fails in form, premise acceptability, relevance, context, category stability, comparison class, burden of proof, or normative warrant."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The atom states the exact persuasion-warrant gap and material rather than formal location of the defect.", "role_mapping": "Persuasive conclusion -> persuasion force; content-sensitive failure -> material defect.", "slug": "informal_fallacy", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b035_a02_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The argument may be valid-looking while relying on hidden material defects. In this condition set, the requirement is: An argument is persuasive although its support fails through content, context, relevance, or premise acceptability rather than formal invalidity.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A conclusion is persuasive but the support relation feels content-dependent or context-sensitive."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Informal Fallacy", "one_liner": "A named, recurring pattern of defective argument whose error lies not in logical form but in content, context, or the relevance and acceptability of its premises — so it can be valid in form yet still fail as reasoning.", "page_ref": "prime:informal_fallacy", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Persuasive conclusion -> persuasion force; content-sensitive failure -> material defect.", "slug": "informal_fallacy", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The atom states the exact persuasion-warrant gap and material rather than formal location of the defect."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "An argument is persuasive although its support fails through content, context, relevance, or premise acceptability rather than formal invalidity.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P065-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must involve debate participants using named fallacy labels about arguments.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Participants apply and exchange fallacy labels in a debate.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail omission of substantive evaluation of the labelled arguments.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The arguments receiving the labels are not tested.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must make label exchange function in place of argument testing rather than alongside it.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Exchanging the labels substitutes for testing the arguments.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Debate participants trade fallacy names instead of testing the arguments to which the labels are applied.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Fallacy-label exchange substitutes for argument testing.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P065-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime requires a genuine named material defect; it does not require or justify label-trading at the meta level.", "slug": "informal_fallacy"}], "residual_id": "r:informal_fallacy_diagnosis_and_repair:b035_a02_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b035_a02_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Fallacy labels become rhetoric unless tied to a specific defective inference move. In this condition set, the requirement is: Participants trade fallacy names instead of testing the arguments to which the labels are applied.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A debate turns into trading fallacy names rather than testing the argument."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime requires a genuine named material defect; it does not require or justify label-trading at the meta level.", "slug": "informal_fallacy"}], "normalized_requirement": "Participants trade fallacy names instead of testing the arguments to which the labels are applied.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Participants trade fallacy names instead of testing the arguments to which the labels are applied.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A claim can face exceptions or rival framings without instantiating a recurring named defect of reasoning.", "slug": "informal_fallacy"}], "residual_id": "r:informal_fallacy_diagnosis_and_repair:b035_a02_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b035_a02_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "No True Scotsman, false dilemma, nirvana fallacy, misplaced concreteness, and Texas sharpshooter-like errors often appear here. In this condition set, the requirement is: A universal, categorical, causal, normative, or comparative claim faces exceptions or rival framings.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A universal, categorical, causal, normative, or comparative claim faces exceptions or rival framings."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A claim can face exceptions or rival framings without instantiating a recurring named defect of reasoning.", "slug": "informal_fallacy"}], "normalized_requirement": "A universal, categorical, causal, normative, or comparative claim faces exceptions or rival framings.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A universal, categorical, causal, normative, or comparative claim faces exceptions or rival framings.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Unacceptable premises are one possible material defect, but informal fallacies also arise from relevance, ambiguity, comparison, and other failures; the prime does not universally entail this specific premise state.", "slug": "informal_fallacy"}], "residual_id": "r:informal_fallacy_diagnosis_and_repair:b035_a02_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b035_a02_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Formal validity does not rescue unsupported, equivocal, irrelevant, idealized, or question-begging premises. In this condition set, the requirement is: A premise may be unacceptable even when the conclusion follows from it.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A premise may be unacceptable even if the conclusion follows from it."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Unacceptable premises are one possible material defect, but informal fallacies also arise from relevance, ambiguity, comparison, and other failures; the prime does not universally entail this specific premise state.", "slug": "informal_fallacy"}], "normalized_requirement": "A premise may be unacceptable even when the conclusion follows from it.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A premise may be unacceptable even when the conclusion follows from it.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P065-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must connect an abstract representation to authorization of a concrete intervention.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A representation is treated as warrant for a concrete intervention.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail claimed sufficiency without additional empirical, causal, or normative warrant.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The representation is treated as sufficient by itself.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete branch must apply the warrant inflation to a model.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The representation can be a model.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete branch must apply the warrant inflation to a metric.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The representation can be a metric.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete branch must apply the warrant inflation to a category.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The representation can be a category.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete branch must apply the warrant inflation to an abstraction.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The representation can be an abstraction.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "A model, metric, category, or abstraction is treated as sufficient by itself to license a concrete intervention.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An abstract representation is treated as sufficient warrant for concrete intervention.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P065-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Formalization can be used descriptively without licensing or motivating a concrete intervention.", "slug": "formalization"}], "residual_id": "r:informal_fallacy_diagnosis_and_repair:b035_a02_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b035_a02_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This often signals a material or contextual defect rather than a formal inference error. In this condition set, the requirement is: A model, metric, category, or abstraction is treated as sufficient warrant for a concrete intervention.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A model, metric, category, or abstraction is treated as if it licenses concrete interventions by itself."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Formalization can be used descriptively without licensing or motivating a concrete intervention.", "slug": "formalization"}], "normalized_requirement": "A model, metric, category, or abstraction is treated as sufficient warrant for a concrete intervention.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A model, metric, category, or abstraction is treated as sufficient warrant for a concrete intervention.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Legal, policy, scientific, or public arguments carry action stakes.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The review must distinguish harmless rhetorical shortcut from decision-relevant reasoning failure. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Legal, policy, scientific, or public arguments carry action stakes. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Legal, policy, scientific, or public arguments carry action stakes.", "The review must distinguish harmless rhetorical shortcut from decision-relevant reasoning failure."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Legal, policy, scientific, or public arguments carry action stakes."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 35, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-035", "ledger_sha256": "b2d9cb6a58efe93b2206285661de58066df05438ebedb6523fd83adb353705b9"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Informal Structure Mapping", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:informal_structure_mapping", "slug": "informal_structure_mapping"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 5, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 4, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 4 of 5 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a mismatch between the official operating model and the actual operating model. The formal model gives accountability, visibility, and planned coordination. The informal model carries adaptation, tacit knowledge, trust, and practical exception handling. When the gap is invisible, leaders redesign the wrong system.\n\nThe gap often appears because formal structure is too slow, incomplete, obsolete, politically unsafe, or blind to real constraints. People then create shadow processes that keep work moving. These shadow processes may be helpful, but they can also create fragility, inequity, compliance risk, and single points of failure.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "The official structure says one thing, but real decisions, work, trust, information flow, exceptions, and practical authority move through informal networks and workarounds that are invisible to formal governance."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact comparison identifies formal codified elements, informal enacted patterns, and their fit or conflict.", "role_mapping": "Documents -> formal layer; lived practice -> informal layer; mismatch -> fit characterization.", "slug": "formal_vs_informal_structures", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The exact relation is systematic divergence between an authoritative prescription and enacted work.", "role_mapping": "Formal document -> prescriptive artefact; lived practice -> enacted practice; mismatch -> systematic divergence.", "slug": "procedure_work_mismatch", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b035_a03_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Formal documents do not match lived practice. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Formal documents do not match lived practice"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Formal vs. Informal Structures", "one_liner": "Official vs actual systems.", "page_ref": "prime:formal_vs_informal_structures", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Documents -> formal layer; lived practice -> informal layer; mismatch -> fit characterization.", "slug": "formal_vs_informal_structures", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact comparison identifies formal codified elements, informal enacted patterns, and their fit or conflict."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Procedure-Work Mismatch", "one_liner": "A system's prescribed model of how work happens diverges systematically from how work is actually done, with the gap often load-bearing for performance, so the question is how the gap is managed rather than whether it can be eliminated.", "page_ref": "prime:procedure_work_mismatch", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Formal document -> prescriptive artefact; lived practice -> enacted practice; mismatch -> systematic divergence.", "slug": "procedure_work_mismatch", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact relation is systematic divergence between an authoritative prescription and enacted work."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Official documents or prescribed procedures systematically diverge from lived practice.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Functional informal structures fill gaps and enable local adaptation where the formal layer is inadequate.", "role_mapping": "Workarounds -> informal gap-filling function.", "slug": "formal_vs_informal_structures", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime explicitly requires a load-bearing gap bridged by tacit adaptation.", "role_mapping": "Repeated workaround -> tacit adaptation; normal operation -> load-bearing gap.", "slug": "procedure_work_mismatch", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b035_a03_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Repeated workarounds are normal. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Repeated workarounds are normal"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Formal vs. Informal Structures", "one_liner": "Official vs actual systems.", "page_ref": "prime:formal_vs_informal_structures", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Workarounds -> informal gap-filling function.", "slug": "formal_vs_informal_structures", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Functional informal structures fill gaps and enable local adaptation where the formal layer is inadequate."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Procedure-Work Mismatch", "one_liner": "A system's prescribed model of how work happens diverges systematically from how work is actually done, with the gap often load-bearing for performance, so the question is how the gap is managed rather than whether it can be eliminated.", "page_ref": "prime:procedure_work_mismatch", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Repeated workaround -> tacit adaptation; normal operation -> load-bearing gap.", "slug": "procedure_work_mismatch", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime explicitly requires a load-bearing gap bridged by tacit adaptation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Repeated informal workarounds bridge a load-bearing gap in prescribed work.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Actual decision power, informal communication networks, and trust-based coordination are explicit roles in the exact structure.", "role_mapping": "Hidden brokers -> informal network; carried coordination -> actual functional layer.", "slug": "formal_vs_informal_structures", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b035_a03_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Hidden brokers or informal leaders carry coordination. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Hidden brokers or informal leaders carry coordination"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Formal vs. Informal Structures", "one_liner": "Official vs actual systems.", "page_ref": "prime:formal_vs_informal_structures", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Hidden brokers -> informal network; carried coordination -> actual functional layer.", "slug": "formal_vs_informal_structures", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Actual decision power, informal communication networks, and trust-based coordination are explicit roles in the exact structure."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Hidden brokers or informal leaders carry actual coordination outside the official role map.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P065-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must identify official channels with an escalation function.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Formal channels are designated for escalation.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail underuse relative to intended or expected escalation-channel use.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Actual use is below the use implied by the channels' designated role.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Official escalation channels receive less use than their designated escalation role calls for.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Official escalation channels are underused relative to their intended role.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P065-C13-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Formal and informal layers can fit well while official escalation channels are used as designed.", "slug": "formal_vs_informal_structures"}], "residual_id": "r:informal_structure_mapping:b035_a03_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b035_a03_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Official escalation channels are underused. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Official escalation channels are underused"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Formal and informal layers can fit well while official escalation channels are used as designed.", "slug": "formal_vs_informal_structures"}], "normalized_requirement": "Official escalation channels are systematically underused.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Official escalation channels are systematically underused.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B5", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P065-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require actual formal authorization rather than pending or possible approval.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A change effort receives formal approval.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail failed enactment or implementation after approval.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The approved effort fails to produce the intended change.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the contrast in which authorization is insufficient for enacted change.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Implementation failure persists despite formal approval.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "A change effort receives formal approval but still fails to produce the intended change.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Formal approval fails to produce enacted change.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P065-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A formal-informal structure can support successful change; failed implementation after approval is not mandatory.", "slug": "formal_vs_informal_structures"}], "residual_id": "r:informal_structure_mapping:b035_a03_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b035_a03_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Change efforts fail despite formal approval. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Change efforts fail despite formal approval"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_GUARDED_EQUIVALENT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "An unapproved but deployment-ready innovation is a live counterexample before the guard; actual formal approval removes exactly that case.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Ecosystem Mismatch", "one_liner": "Explain why a technically sound innovation stalls on deployment not by a flaw in the artifact but by the absence of one specific complementary asset its operating context tacitly required — leaving it complete-but-functionally-blocked.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:ecosystem_mismatch", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1", "O3"], "guard_type": "MODALITY_ACTUALIZATION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "innovation_formally_approved_for_deployment", "predicate": "The technically sound innovation has received formal approval for deployment.", "rationale": "The retained expression preserves the candidate's principal roles and relation. The single qualifier is candidate-anchored, atomic, sufficient for every gap in one complete DNF branch, and neither restates the head nor selects an unnamed favorable subtype."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "ecosystem_mismatch"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The technically sound innovation has received formal approval for deployment."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "ecosystem_mismatch", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P065-C14-U1", "why_it_fits": "The technically sound innovation and its blocked deployment/value delivery supply the change-effort and failed-enactment spine. One actual formal-approval fact closes the approval antecedent and its persistence reading; the fact is atomic, candidate-anchored, and leaves the failure relation DSA-supplied."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_GUARDED_EQUIVALENT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Successful pilots may remain unscaled without any scale approval; the guard excludes that case while leaving the missing transition mechanism intact.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Pilot Purgatory", "one_liner": "Relocate the diagnosis of an initiative that keeps running successful pilots without ever scaling from 'weak evidence' to 'a missing transition mechanism' — the loop is sustained by each pilot's local success, and the fault sits one level up in the decision infrastructure.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:pilot_purgatory", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1", "O3"], "guard_type": "MODALITY_ACTUALIZATION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "piloted_initiative_formally_approved_for_adoption", "predicate": "The repeatedly piloted initiative has received formal approval for adoption at scale.", "rationale": "The retained expression preserves the candidate's principal roles and relation. The single qualifier is candidate-anchored, atomic, sufficient for every gap in one complete DNF branch, and neither restates the head nor selects an unnamed favorable subtype."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "pilot_purgatory"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The repeatedly piloted initiative has received formal approval for adoption at scale."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "pilot_purgatory", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P065-C14-U1", "why_it_fits": "Repeatedly successful pilots without scaled institutional adoption directly supply a persistent implementation failure. One actual approval-for-scale fact closes O1 and the approval component of O3; it adds only status to an already-present initiative and transition, so it is sufficient without laundering the head."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A control that was never authorized, never in force, or never worked would fail the unit, but the exact candidate excludes those cases by requiring a formally instituted, once-working control whose practical protection has decayed.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Hazard-Control Decay", "one_liner": "Track the widening gap between what a safety control's paperwork says it does and what it actually does under hazard, so that a control certified sound by audit can be found silently unprotective before it fails.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:hazard_control_decay", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "hazard_control_decay"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "hazard_control_decay", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P065-C14-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact identity requires a formally in-force protective intervention and a later divergence between nominal authorization and actual protective effect. That directly entails approval, intended change, and failure of enactment despite approval."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Change efforts fail despite receiving formal approval.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 5", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "DISJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 35, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-035", "ledger_sha256": "b2d9cb6a58efe93b2206285661de58066df05438ebedb6523fd83adb353705b9"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Information Set Specification and Completeness Verification", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:information_set_specification_and_completeness_verification", "slug": "information_set_specification_and_completeness_verification"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 5, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 2, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 2, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 7 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 2 of 5 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 7}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A price, quote, index, forecast, ranking, or market-like signal is treated as though it reflects all relevant information, but the relevant information set is vague, shifting, or untested. Decision-makers may overtrust the signal, overlook stale or excluded information, misunderstand the form of market efficiency being claimed, or miss exploitable residual opportunities.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A price, quote, index, forecast, ranking, or market-like signal is treated as though it reflects all relevant information, but the relevant information set is vague, shifting, or untested. Decision-makers may overtrust the signal, overlook stale or excluded information, misunderstand the form of market efficiency being claimed, or miss exploitable residual opportunities."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Efficiency is defined exactly relative to an information set whose contents are reflected in prices and leave no abnormal conditional return.", "role_mapping": "Market signal -> price; available information -> Ω_t; reflected -> conditional efficiency.", "slug": "efficient_market_hypothesis_emh", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b035_a04_c1a", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A claim is made that prices, quotes, rankings, valuations, or market signals already reflect available information. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A claim is made that prices, quotes, rankings, valuations, or market signals already reflect available information."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH)", "one_liner": "Prices reflect info.", "page_ref": "prime:efficient_market_hypothesis_emh", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Market signal -> price; available information -> Ω_t; reflected -> conditional efficiency.", "slug": "efficient_market_hypothesis_emh", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Efficiency is defined exactly relative to an information set whose contents are reflected in prices and leave no abnormal conditional return."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Prices or market signals are asserted to reflect a specified available-information set.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P065-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O9"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must involve at least two actors evaluating membership in the same operative information set.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Multiple actors hold positions about one operative information set.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail opposed set-membership judgments rather than uncertainty by one actor.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The actors disagree about whether an information class belongs to the set.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete branch must concern membership of public information.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The disputed class can be public information.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete branch must concern membership of semi-public information.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The disputed class can be semi-public information.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete branch must concern membership of private information.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The disputed class can be private information.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete branch must concern membership of information costly to obtain.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The disputed class can be costly information.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete branch must concern membership of locally held information.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The disputed class can be local information.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete branch must concern membership of alternative information.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The disputed class can be alternative information.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete branch must concern membership of order-flow information.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "The disputed class can be order-flow information.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Different actors disagree about whether a named access class of information belongs to the operative information set.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Actors dispute the boundary of an operative information set.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P065-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Completeness does not require multiple actors or a dispute over market-information access classes.", "slug": "completeness"}], "residual_id": "r:information_set_specification_and_completeness_verification:b035_a04_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b035_a04_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Different actors disagree about whether public, semi-public, private, costly, local, alternative, or order-flow information is in scope. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Different actors disagree about whether public, semi-public, private, costly, local, alternative, or order-flow information is in scope."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Without the guard, experts could disagree about a medical diagnosis or any other fuzzy category; the guard excludes those domains with one role binding.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Label Ambiguity", "one_liner": "Diagnose a headline accuracy figure as a blend of two measurements — model capability in the class interior where annotators agree, and mere adjudication agreement in the boundary zone where reasonable experts split — by stratifying metrics on the inter-annotator agreement rate.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:label_ambiguity", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1", "O3"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "public_information_membership_in_operative_set", "predicate": "The disputed boundary case is whether public information belongs to the operative information set.", "rationale": "The retained expression preserves the candidate's principal roles and relation. The single qualifier is candidate-anchored, atomic, sufficient for every gap in one complete DNF branch, and neither restates the head nor selects an unnamed favorable subtype."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "label_ambiguity"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The disputed boundary case is whether public information belongs to the operative information set."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "label_ambiguity", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P065-C15-U1", "why_it_fits": "The candidate directly supplies multiple annotators and opposed membership judgments at a fuzzy boundary. The single domain binding makes the disputed item the public-information class and the category the operative information set, selecting O1–O2–O3 without adding disagreement; the predicate is one anchored membership binding, not a restatement of the head."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Actors disagree about whether public, private, costly, local, alternative, or order-flow information belongs to the operative set.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Efficiency is defined exactly relative to an information set whose contents are reflected in prices and leave no abnormal conditional return.", "role_mapping": "Market signal -> price; available information -> Ω_t; reflected -> conditional efficiency.", "slug": "efficient_market_hypothesis_emh", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b035_a04_c1a", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A claim is made that prices, quotes, rankings, valuations, or market signals already reflect available information. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A claim is made that prices, quotes, rankings, valuations, or market signals already reflect available information."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH)", "one_liner": "Prices reflect info.", "page_ref": "prime:efficient_market_hypothesis_emh", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Market signal -> price; available information -> Ω_t; reflected -> conditional efficiency.", "slug": "efficient_market_hypothesis_emh", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Efficiency is defined exactly relative to an information set whose contents are reflected in prices and leave no abnormal conditional return."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Prices or market signals are asserted to reflect a specified available-information set.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P066-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying abstraction must entail an information-bearing occurrence acting on a price response, not merely a generic signal or outcome.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The initiating role is an information-bearing disclosure, event, or signal and the affected role is price.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying abstraction must entail the expected or normatively predicted price change, not only that a price change could occur.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The occurrence should have changed prices under the applicable expectation.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying abstraction must preserve the expected-versus-observed response comparison and the observed shortfall.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The observed response is deficient relative to the expected price change.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a satisfying abstraction must entail slower-than-expected incorporation into price.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The observed price response is delayed.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a satisfying abstraction must entail incomplete rather than full incorporation into price.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The observed price response is only partial.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a satisfying abstraction must entail a noisy information-to-price response, not merely uncertainty elsewhere.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The observed price response is noisy.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a satisfying abstraction must entail inconsistency in the price response across relevant observations or contexts.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The observed price response is inconsistent.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "An information-bearing occurrence is expected to change prices, but the observed price response is delayed, partial, noisy, or inconsistent.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Observed price response is deficient relative to an expected information-driven price change.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P066-C01-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Signaling can produce immediate and consistent updating and does not require market-price underreaction.", "slug": "signaling"}], "residual_id": "r:information_set_specification_and_completeness_verification:b035_a04_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b035_a04_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A disclosure, event, or signal should have changed prices, but observed response is delayed, partial, noisy, or inconsistent. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A disclosure, event, or signal should have changed prices, but observed response is delayed, partial, noisy, or inconsistent."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Signaling can produce immediate and consistent updating and does not require market-price underreaction.", "slug": "signaling"}], "normalized_requirement": "A disclosure or event produces a delayed, partial, noisy, or inconsistent price response.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A disclosure or event produces a delayed, partial, noisy, or inconsistent price response.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Efficiency is defined exactly relative to an information set whose contents are reflected in prices and leave no abnormal conditional return.", "role_mapping": "Market signal -> price; available information -> Ω_t; reflected -> conditional efficiency.", "slug": "efficient_market_hypothesis_emh", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b035_a04_c1a", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A claim is made that prices, quotes, rankings, valuations, or market signals already reflect available information. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A claim is made that prices, quotes, rankings, valuations, or market signals already reflect available information."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH)", "one_liner": "Prices reflect info.", "page_ref": "prime:efficient_market_hypothesis_emh", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Market signal -> price; available information -> Ω_t; reflected -> conditional efficiency.", "slug": "efficient_market_hypothesis_emh", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Efficiency is defined exactly relative to an information set whose contents are reflected in prices and leave no abnormal conditional return."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Prices or market signals are asserted to reflect a specified available-information set.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P066-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying abstraction must entail multiple related information-incorporating domains, not unrelated actors or a single venue.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "At least two compared roles are related markets or analogous information-incorporating domains.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying abstraction must relate the compared domains to a common informational object or event.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Each compared domain reflects or incorporates the same information.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying abstraction must entail heterogeneous incorporation speed across domains, not merely unequal information possession.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The information-incorporation speeds differ across the related domains.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying abstraction must be compatible with an empirically apparent difference and must not require certainty beyond the source.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The speed difference is presented as an observed appearance rather than a certainty claim.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "Related markets or analogous channels appear to incorporate the same information at different speeds.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Related domains incorporate the same information at different speeds.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P066-C02-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Information asymmetry concerns unequal possession or access, not necessarily differing incorporation speeds across related markets.", "slug": "information_asymmetry"}], "residual_id": "r:information_set_specification_and_completeness_verification:b035_a04_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b035_a04_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Related markets, instruments, neighborhoods, platforms, or channels appear to reflect information at different speeds. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Related markets, instruments, neighborhoods, platforms, or channels appear to reflect information at different speeds."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Information asymmetry concerns unequal possession or access, not necessarily differing incorporation speeds across related markets.", "slug": "information_asymmetry"}], "normalized_requirement": "Related markets or channels incorporate the same information at different speeds.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Related markets or channels incorporate the same information at different speeds.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Efficiency is defined exactly relative to an information set whose contents are reflected in prices and leave no abnormal conditional return.", "role_mapping": "Market signal -> price; available information -> Ω_t; reflected -> conditional efficiency.", "slug": "efficient_market_hypothesis_emh", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b035_a04_c1a", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A claim is made that prices, quotes, rankings, valuations, or market signals already reflect available information. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A claim is made that prices, quotes, rankings, valuations, or market signals already reflect available information."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH)", "one_liner": "Prices reflect info.", "page_ref": "prime:efficient_market_hypothesis_emh", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Market signal -> price; available information -> Ω_t; reflected -> conditional efficiency.", "slug": "efficient_market_hypothesis_emh", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Efficiency is defined exactly relative to an information set whose contents are reflected in prices and leave no abnormal conditional return."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Prices or market signals are asserted to reflect a specified available-information set.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P066-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying abstraction must entail a market or market-like valuation context for the specified outcome.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The outcome occurs in a price, valuation, return, or arbitrage market context.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying abstraction must support possibility of the outcome and must not require that it is already actual.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The specified outcome may occur; actuality is not required.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a satisfying abstraction must entail predictability of risk-adjusted excess return, not merely ordinary return variation or unadjusted excess return.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Risk-adjusted excess return is predictable.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a satisfying abstraction must entail arbitrage in the relevant market context.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "An arbitrage opportunity exists.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a satisfying abstraction must entail a valuation that has not incorporated relevant current information.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The valuation remains stale.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a satisfying abstraction must entail underreaction temporally following an information release.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "A market response underreacts after information is released.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "A market may exhibit predictable risk-adjusted excess return, arbitrage, stale valuation, or underreaction after an information release.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A possible market inefficiency is manifested by one of four specified outcomes.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P066-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact efficiency condition makes risk-adjusted excess returns unpredictable from the stipulated information set; this is a potential rejection, not an entailment.", "slug": "efficient_market_hypothesis_emh"}], "residual_id": "r:information_set_specification_and_completeness_verification:b035_a04_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b035_a04_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: There may be predictable excess return, arbitrage, stale valuation, or underreaction after information release. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["There may be predictable excess return, arbitrage, stale valuation, or underreaction after information release."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A latent-demand or misallocated-resource discovery lacks price-spread arbitrage, but the guard excludes those instances; a guarded instance necessarily contains the selected arbitrage opportunity.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Entrepreneurial Discovery", "one_liner": "Explain how markets correct their own disequilibria — alert agents perceive profit gaps that others overlook and are not yet in anyone's search space, act on them, and thereby arbitrage the gaps away, an endogenous error-correction no central planner could replicate.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:entrepreneurial_discovery", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O4"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "disequilibrium_is_price_spread", "predicate": "The candidate disequilibrium is a buy-low/sell-high price-spread arbitrage opportunity.", "rationale": "Publication is safe because one candidate-anchored context fact selects an explicit price-spread manifestation; it neither restates the unit head nor adds a missing principal role or unrelated relation."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "entrepreneurial_discovery"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The candidate disequilibrium is a buy-low/sell-high price-spread arbitrage opportunity."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "entrepreneurial_discovery", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P066-C03-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record directly supplies market disequilibrium and an actual profit opportunity, which entails the weaker possibility obligation. One atomic, explicitly anchored branch-selection guard restricts the record to its named price-spread arbitrage manifestation and completes O1-O2-O4 without laundering another condition."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Risk-adjusted excess returns, arbitrage, stale valuation, or post-release underreaction may be predictable.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B5", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Zero conditional excess return relative to Ω_t is the prime's defining claim.", "role_mapping": "Available-information set -> Ω_t; no improvement -> conditional martingale or zero abnormal return.", "slug": "efficient_market_hypothesis_emh", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b035_a04_c6a", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A decision relies on an EMH-like assumption that no available information can improve the signal. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A decision relies on an EMH-like assumption that no available information can improve the signal."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH)", "one_liner": "Prices reflect info.", "page_ref": "prime:efficient_market_hypothesis_emh", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Available-information set -> Ω_t; no improvement -> conditional martingale or zero abnormal return.", "slug": "efficient_market_hypothesis_emh", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Zero conditional excess return relative to Ω_t is the prime's defining claim."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The operative model assumes that no information in the specified set can improve risk-adjusted price or return prediction.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P066-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying abstraction must entail a changed market arrangement, not a stable information asymmetry.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The antecedent role is an institutional or technical change in market structure.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying abstraction must entail the directional effect of the structural change on information access.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The market-structure change alters access to information.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying abstraction must entail a changed participant-to-information access mapping, not only a change in information content.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The alteration changes which participants can obtain which information.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying abstraction must preserve the market-information domain rather than entail only generic access control.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The changed access concerns market information.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "A change in market structure alters which participants can obtain which market information.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Market-structure change alters the distribution of access to market information.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P066-C04-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Information asymmetry can remain stable and need not be caused by a change in feeds, regulation, venue, or access.", "slug": "information_asymmetry"}], "residual_id": "r:information_set_specification_and_completeness_verification:b035_a04_c7", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b035_a04_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The market structure changes through new data feeds, regulations, disclosure regimes, trading venues, or participant access. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The market structure changes through new data feeds, regulations, disclosure regimes, trading venues, or participant access."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Information asymmetry can remain stable and need not be caused by a change in feeds, regulation, venue, or access.", "slug": "information_asymmetry"}], "normalized_requirement": "New feeds, regulations, disclosures, venues, or access arrangements change who can obtain which market information.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "New feeds, regulations, disclosures, venues, or access arrangements change who can obtain which market information.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 5", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 35, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-035", "ledger_sha256": "b2d9cb6a58efe93b2206285661de58066df05438ebedb6523fd83adb353705b9"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Informed Consent Governance", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:informed_consent_governance", "slug": "informed_consent_governance"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 5, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 6 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural failure is consent theater: a system collects evidence of assent but does not create meaningful permission. The consent record may look clean while the underlying relationship is defective. The person may not understand the action, may face hidden pressure, may be agreeing to many unrelated uses at once, may lack authority to agree, or may be unable to revoke consent later.\n\nThe root tension is that institutions and systems need permission to act, while affected people need real control over what they authorize. Without governance, consent becomes a transfer of burden from the powerful actor to the less powerful one.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system treats assent, participation, silence, continued use, a signature, or a checkbox as consent even though the person lacked adequate information, understanding, freedom to refuse, authority to grant permission, scope clarity, or a workable withdrawal path."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact relation requires the authority-holder to authorize another party's action before it occurs.", "role_mapping": "Permission holder -> autonomous authority; proposed action -> action in protected domain; permission -> expressed authorization.", "slug": "consent", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b035_a05_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Permission-dependent action. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Permission-dependent action"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Consent", "one_liner": "Voluntary agreement.", "page_ref": "prime:consent", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Permission holder -> autonomous authority; proposed action -> action in protected domain; permission -> expressed authorization.", "slug": "consent", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact relation requires the authority-holder to authorize another party's action before it occurs."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "One party must obtain voluntary authorization from the autonomous holder before acting within that holder's domain.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P066-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying abstraction must entail distinct authorization-related parties rather than a single person's incomplete knowledge.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The principal roles are at least two parties participating in or affected by an authorization decision.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying abstraction must entail an informational disparity between the parties, not merely uncertainty shared equally.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The parties possess unequal information.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying abstraction must preserve that the disparity is consequential rather than negligible.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The informational inequality is material to the decision.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying abstraction must connect the unequal information to authorization or consent, not to an unrelated decision.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The unequal information is relevant to the authorization decision.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "The parties to an authorization decision possess materially unequal information relevant to that decision.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Authorization parties have materially unequal decision-relevant information.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P066-C05-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Valid consent requires adequate disclosure and comprehension but can occur between equally informed parties.", "slug": "consent"}], "residual_id": "r:informed_consent_governance:b035_a05_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b035_a05_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Information asymmetry. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Information asymmetry"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Valid consent requires adequate disclosure and comprehension but can occur between equally informed parties.", "slug": "consent"}], "normalized_requirement": "The parties have materially unequal information relevant to the authorization decision.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The parties have materially unequal information relevant to the authorization decision.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P066-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O4", "O5", "O6"], ["O1", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying abstraction must entail parties situated in an authorization relationship, not an unrelated hierarchy.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The principal roles are parties in a consent or authorization relationship.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a satisfying abstraction must entail an interparty power imbalance.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The consent parties have a power imbalance.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a satisfying abstraction must entail an interparty dependency imbalance.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The consent parties have a dependency imbalance.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying abstraction must entail a directional compromising influence from the specified imbalance to voluntariness.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The specified imbalance can compromise voluntariness.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying abstraction must support risk or possibility of compromise without requiring actual coercion in every instance.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Compromise of voluntariness is possible, not asserted as inevitable.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying abstraction must preserve voluntariness in the consent domain rather than generic autonomy.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The affected voluntariness concerns consent or authorization.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "A power or dependency imbalance between consent parties may compromise the voluntariness of authorization.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Interparty imbalance may compromise consent voluntariness.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P066-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Consent requires voluntariness and therefore does not entail a power imbalance that threatens it.", "slug": "consent"}], "residual_id": "r:informed_consent_governance:b035_a05_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b035_a05_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Power or dependency imbalance. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Power or dependency imbalance"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Consent requires voluntariness and therefore does not entail a power imbalance that threatens it.", "slug": "consent"}], "normalized_requirement": "Power or dependency imbalance may compromise voluntariness.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Power or dependency imbalance may compromise voluntariness.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P066-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying abstraction must entail an authorization object, not complexity of an unrelated artifact or process.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The object bearing complexity is a proposed consent or authorization.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying abstraction must attribute complexity to what is authorized or what follows from authorization.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The authorization has complexity in a specified content or consequence dimension.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a satisfying abstraction must entail complexity in the authorization's scope.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The authorization's scope is complex.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a satisfying abstraction must entail complexity in the authorization's purpose.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The authorization's purpose is complex.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a satisfying abstraction must entail complexity in authorized reuse or secondary use.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The authorization's reuse conditions are complex.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a satisfying abstraction must entail complexity in the risks associated with authorization.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The authorization's risks are complex.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a satisfying abstraction must entail complexity in downstream consequences of authorization.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The authorization's downstream consequences are complex.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "A proposed authorization is complex in its scope, purpose, reuse, risk, or downstream consequences.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "The content or consequences of a proposed authorization are complex.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P066-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Delegation can be simple and does not require consent-specific purpose, reuse, or downstream-risk complexity.", "slug": "delegation_of_authority"}], "residual_id": "r:informed_consent_governance:b035_a05_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b035_a05_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Scope or purpose complexity. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Scope or purpose complexity"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Delegation can be simple and does not require consent-specific purpose, reuse, or downstream-risk complexity.", "slug": "delegation_of_authority"}], "normalized_requirement": "The proposed authorization has complex scope, purpose, reuse, risk, or downstream consequences.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The proposed authorization has complex scope, purpose, reuse, risk, or downstream consequences.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Consent includes revocation but can govern a completed one-time action without longitudinal review or changing circumstances.", "slug": "consent"}], "residual_id": "r:informed_consent_governance:b035_a05_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b035_a05_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Consent over time. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Consent over time"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Consent includes revocation but can govern a completed one-time action without longitudinal review or changing circumstances.", "slug": "consent"}], "normalized_requirement": "Authorization must remain valid, reviewable, and revocable as circumstances change over time.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Authorization must remain valid, reviewable, and revocable as circumstances change over time.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P066-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying abstraction must entail distinct representative and represented-person roles.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "One role is a representative or proxy and another is the represented person.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying abstraction must entail authorization performed for another person, not ordinary first-party consent.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The representative authorizes on the represented person's behalf.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying abstraction must entail an authority relation licensing the proxy's authorization act.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The representative's authorization depends on having appropriate authority.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying abstraction must preserve the contingent possibility of an authority requirement rather than universalize it.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The authority requirement may apply and is not asserted as universal.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying abstraction must preserve the authorization domain rather than generic representation.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The relation concerns permission, consent, or authorization.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "A representative may need authority to authorize on another person's behalf.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Proxy authorization may require representative authority from or for a represented rights-holder.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P066-C08-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Consent ordinarily comes from the autonomous rights-holder; proxy authorization is a special institutional substitute, not universal.", "slug": "consent"}], "residual_id": "r:informed_consent_governance:b035_a05_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b035_a05_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Representative or proxy permission. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Representative or proxy permission"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Consent ordinarily comes from the autonomous rights-holder; proxy authorization is a special institutional substitute, not universal.", "slug": "consent"}], "normalized_requirement": "A representative or proxy may need authority to authorize on another person's behalf.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A representative or proxy may need authority to authorize on another person's behalf.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 35, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-035", "ledger_sha256": "b2d9cb6a58efe93b2206285661de58066df05438ebedb6523fd83adb353705b9"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Initiative Seizure and Tempo Control", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:initiative_seizure_and_tempo_control", "slug": "initiative_seizure_and_tempo_control"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 5, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A contested situation remains ambiguous enough that multiple actors could define the next move; delay lets an opponent choose the tempo, venue, premise, or constraint before the focal actor can shape the field.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A contested situation remains ambiguous enough that multiple actors could define the next move; delay lets an opponent choose the tempo, venue, premise, or constraint before the focal actor can shape the field."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Unilateral first movement that selects the frame and narrows the opponent's reply menu is the exact agenda-control relation.", "role_mapping": "Early commitment -> unilateral first movement; frame or position -> contested dimension; advantage -> agenda control.", "slug": "offensive_action", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b035_a06_c1a", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The environment rewards early commitment, early framing, or early occupation of a scarce position. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The environment rewards early commitment, early framing, or early occupation of a scarce position."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Offensive Action", "one_liner": "Commit to unilateral first movement that forces opponents into a reactive posture, letting the initiator set the tempo, location, and terms of engagement and so control the agenda.", "page_ref": "prime:offensive_action", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Early commitment -> unilateral first movement; frame or position -> contested dimension; advantage -> agenda control.", "slug": "offensive_action", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Unilateral first movement that selects the frame and narrows the opponent's reply menu is the exact agenda-control relation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "An actor can commit first and thereby control a scarce position, frame, or agenda.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Tempo asymmetry, response-forcing cost, and stable reactive subordination are the exact structure.", "role_mapping": "Faster actor -> favored decision cycle; slower opponent -> reactive actor; forced response -> subordination.", "slug": "decision_cycle_subordination", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b035_a06_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Opponents are slower, more constrained, more legitimacy-bound, or forced to respond publicly once a move is made. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Opponents are slower, more constrained, more legitimacy-bound, or forced to respond publicly once a move is made."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Decision Cycle Subordination", "one_liner": "A slower actor's decision cycle becomes forced to respond to a faster actor's tempo, and responding faster deepens the subordination rather than escaping it.", "page_ref": "prime:decision_cycle_subordination", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Faster actor -> favored decision cycle; slower opponent -> reactive actor; forced response -> subordination.", "slug": "decision_cycle_subordination", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Tempo asymmetry, response-forcing cost, and stable reactive subordination are the exact structure."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A faster initiating actor can force a slower or constrained opponent into repeated reactive moves.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The initiator's committed first move selects the contested frame and constrains what the opponent must answer.", "role_mapping": "Concrete first move -> unilateral commitment; next interaction -> narrowed reply menu.", "slug": "offensive_action", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b035_a06_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The next interaction will be structured by whoever first supplies a concrete proposal, position, boundary, or fact on the ground. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The next interaction will be structured by whoever first supplies a concrete proposal, position, boundary, or fact on the ground."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Offensive Action", "one_liner": "Commit to unilateral first movement that forces opponents into a reactive posture, letting the initiator set the tempo, location, and terms of engagement and so control the agenda.", "page_ref": "prime:offensive_action", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Concrete first move -> unilateral commitment; next interaction -> narrowed reply menu.", "slug": "offensive_action", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The initiator's committed first move selects the contested frame and constrains what the opponent must answer."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The first concrete proposal, boundary, position, or fact on the ground structures the opponent's next interaction.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires frame selection and a commitment that trades exposure for agenda control rather than perfect certainty.", "role_mapping": "Favorable arena -> selected frame; uncertainty -> exposure accepted by commitment.", "slug": "offensive_action", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b035_a06_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The actor has enough information to choose a favorable arena without requiring perfect certainty. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The actor has enough information to choose a favorable arena without requiring perfect certainty."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Offensive Action", "one_liner": "Commit to unilateral first movement that forces opponents into a reactive posture, letting the initiator set the tempo, location, and terms of engagement and so control the agenda.", "page_ref": "prime:offensive_action", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Favorable arena -> selected frame; uncertainty -> exposure accepted by commitment.", "slug": "offensive_action", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires frame selection and a commitment that trades exposure for agenda control rather than perfect certainty."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The initiator can choose a favorable arena and commit while accepting residual uncertainty and counter-move exposure.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime is a substrate-defined opening-interior-closing interval in which intervention success is elevated.", "role_mapping": "Temporary window -> bounded receptivity interval; leverage now -> elevated interior; delay -> closing edge.", "slug": "readiness_window", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b035_a06_c5a", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A temporary kairotic window exists: the move matters now but will lose leverage if delayed. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A temporary kairotic window exists: the move matters now but will lose leverage if delayed."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Readiness Window", "one_liner": "A receptive substrate enters a bounded opening-interior-closing interval during which a class of interventions can take hold.", "page_ref": "prime:readiness_window", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Temporary window -> bounded receptivity interval; leverage now -> elevated interior; delay -> closing edge.", "slug": "readiness_window", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime is a substrate-defined opening-interior-closing interval in which intervention success is elevated."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A receptive substrate has a bounded opening, useful interior, and closing interval during which the move can take hold.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 35, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-035", "ledger_sha256": "b2d9cb6a58efe93b2206285661de58066df05438ebedb6523fd83adb353705b9"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Inline vs. Offline Inspection Trade-Off", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:inline_vs_offline_inspection_trade_off", "slug": "inline_vs_offline_inspection_trade_off"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 1, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A process needs quality control, but inspection can be placed either during production or after output is complete. If inspection is too late, defects flow downstream, contaminate batches, reach customers, or require expensive rework. If inspection is too early, too frequent, or too intrusive, it creates bottlenecks, false rejects, operator overload, equipment cost, destructive-test waste, or needless delay. Without an explicit placement trade-off, quality systems drift toward either overinspection or undercontained defect escape.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A process needs quality control, but inspection can be placed either during production or after output is complete. If inspection is too late, defects flow downstream, contaminate batches, reach customers, or require expensive rework. If inspection is too early, too frequent, or too intrusive, it creates bottlenecks, false rejects, operator overload, equipment cost, destructive-test waste, or needless delay. Without an explicit placement trade-off, quality systems drift toward either overinspection or undercontained defect escape."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P066-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying abstraction must entail multiple inspection locations in a process, not multiple reviewers at one location.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The compared roles are multiple defect-inspection points within a process.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying abstraction must entail defect-detection capability at each compared point.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Each compared inspection point can detect defects.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying abstraction must entail a plurality of inspection-point options.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "More than one process point is available for defect detection.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying abstraction must entail a cost difference among the compared inspection locations.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Detection cost differs across the inspection points.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying abstraction must entail a latency difference among the compared inspection locations.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Detection latency differs across the inspection points.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying abstraction must entail a difference in the points' ability or value for containing defects.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "Containment value differs across the inspection points.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Multiple process points can detect defects, and those inspection points differ in cost, latency, and containment value.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Inspection points trade off detection cost, latency, and containment value.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P066-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Parallel independent inspection concerns independent reviewers or channels, not inline-versus-offline placement along a process.", "slug": "parallel_independent_inspection"}], "residual_id": "r:inline_vs_offline_inspection_trade_off:b035_a07_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b035_a07_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Defects can be detected at multiple points in a process, but each point has different cost, latency, and containment value. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Defects can be detected at multiple points in a process, but each point has different cost, latency, and containment value."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Parallel independent inspection concerns independent reviewers or channels, not inline-versus-offline placement along a process.", "slug": "parallel_independent_inspection"}], "normalized_requirement": "Several inspection points offer different detection cost, latency, and containment value.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Several inspection points offer different detection cost, latency, and containment value.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P066-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying abstraction must entail heterogeneous test classes, not one test with a single fixed execution mode.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The compared roles are distinct classes of inspection tests.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying abstraction must preserve the contrast between inline-suitable tests and tests requiring another mode.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Some tests are sufficiently fast for inline execution while other tests are not characterized by that inline suitability.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a satisfying abstraction must entail a laboratory-analysis requirement for the contrasting tests.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The other test class requires laboratory analysis.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a satisfying abstraction must entail a destructive-testing requirement for the contrasting tests.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The other test class requires destructive testing.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a satisfying abstraction must entail a batch-level review requirement for the contrasting tests.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The other test class requires batch-level review.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Some tests are fast enough for inline use, while other tests require laboratory analysis, destructive testing, or batch-level review.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Test methods differ in inline feasibility and inspection requirements.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P066-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Batch processing does not entail inspection or a contrast with fast inline tests.", "slug": "batch_processing"}], "residual_id": "r:inline_vs_offline_inspection_trade_off:b035_a07_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b035_a07_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Some tests are fast enough for inline use while others require laboratory analysis, destructive testing, or batch-level review. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Some tests are fast enough for inline use while others require laboratory analysis, destructive testing, or batch-level review."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Batch processing does not entail inspection or a contrast with fast inline tests.", "slug": "batch_processing"}], "normalized_requirement": "Some tests fit inline execution while others require laboratory, destructive, or batch-level inspection.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Some tests fit inline execution while others require laboratory, destructive, or batch-level inspection.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P066-C11", "dnf": [], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [], "predicate": "A process must choose its inspection coverage mode from full inspection, continuous monitoring, risk-stratified checks, or finished-lot sampling.", "resolution": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RESIDUAL", "semantic_scope": "NON_ABSTRACTION", "structural_head": "Inspection coverage mode is an adjustable process-policy choice.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P066-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Asymmetric screening allocates scrutiny by risk but does not entail this complete inspection-policy menu.", "slug": "asymmetric_screening"}], "residual_id": "r:inline_vs_offline_inspection_trade_off:b035_a07_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b035_a07_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A process must decide between 100% inspection, continuous monitoring, risk-stratified checks, or sampling from finished lots. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A process must decide between 100% inspection, continuous monitoring, risk-stratified checks, or sampling from finished lots."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RECLASSIFIED", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 1, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Asymmetric screening allocates scrutiny by risk but does not entail this complete inspection-policy menu.", "slug": "asymmetric_screening"}], "normalized_requirement": "A process must choose among full inspection, continuous monitoring, risk-stratified checks, and lot sampling.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RECLASSIFIED", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later candidate-blind atomization classified this remainder as a threshold, parameter, materiality test, or other non-abstraction rather than a catalog gap."}, "predicate": "A process must choose among full inspection, continuous monitoring, risk-stratified checks, and lot sampling.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P066-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying abstraction must entail multiple defect classes in a defect-escape context.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The compared roles are different classes of defects that escape inspection or containment.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying abstraction must connect defect class to consequences arising when the defect escapes.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Each defect class is associated with consequences of escape.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying abstraction must entail class-dependent variation in escape consequences, not a uniform defect cost.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The escape consequences differ across defect classes.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying abstraction must preserve consequential rather than negligible variation across classes.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The consequence differences are material.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}], "predicate": "The consequences of defect escape differ materially across defect classes.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Defect-escape consequences vary by defect class.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P066-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A defect can have one consequence class; heterogeneous escape-cost classes are not universal.", "slug": "defect"}], "residual_id": "r:inline_vs_offline_inspection_trade_off:b035_a07_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b035_a07_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Defect escape consequences differ by defect class: cosmetic, functional, safety-critical, regulatory, or customer-trust related. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Defect escape consequences differ by defect class: cosmetic, functional, safety-critical, regulatory, or customer-trust related."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A defect can have one consequence class; heterogeneous escape-cost classes are not universal.", "slug": "defect"}], "normalized_requirement": "Defect-escape consequences vary materially across cosmetic, functional, safety, regulatory, or trust classes.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Defect-escape consequences vary materially across cosmetic, functional, safety, regulatory, or trust classes.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P066-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying abstraction must entail change from a prior quality-regime baseline, not merely a stable indicator value.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A quality-regime indicator has changed relative to its prior state.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying abstraction must preserve the materiality threshold connecting the change to required revision.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The indicator change is large enough to require action.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying abstraction must entail the directional requirement from regime change to inspection-mix revision.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The sufficiently large change requires a new inspection mix.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a satisfying abstraction must entail a changed defect-rate indicator.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The changed indicator is the historical defect rate.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a satisfying abstraction must entail changed process capability.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The changed indicator is process capability.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a satisfying abstraction must entail changed supplier quality.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The changed indicator is supplier quality.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a satisfying abstraction must entail changed customer-complaint evidence.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The changed indicator is customer complaints.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "A sufficiently large change in defect rates, process capability, supplier quality, or customer complaints requires a new inspection mix.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Material quality-regime change invalidates the current inspection mix and requires revision.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P066-C13-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Quality control can operate under stable defect rates and need not require a changed inspection mix.", "slug": "quality_control"}], "residual_id": "r:inline_vs_offline_inspection_trade_off:b035_a07_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b035_a07_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Historical defect rates, process capability, supplier quality, or customer complaints have changed enough to require a new inspection mix. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Historical defect rates, process capability, supplier quality, or customer complaints have changed enough to require a new inspection mix."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Quality control can operate under stable defect rates and need not require a changed inspection mix.", "slug": "quality_control"}], "normalized_requirement": "Changed defect rates, process capability, supplier quality, or complaints invalidate the current inspection mix.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Changed defect rates, process capability, supplier quality, or complaints invalidate the current inspection mix.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Production flow, cycle time, yield, and inspection resources are constrained.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A process needs quality control, but inspection can be placed either during production or after output is complete. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: Production flow, cycle time, yield, and inspection resources are constrained. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Production flow, cycle time, yield, and inspection resources are constrained.", "A process needs quality control, but inspection can be placed either during production or after output is complete."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Production flow, cycle time, yield, and inspection resources are constrained."}, {"display_text": "A regulatory, contractual, or safety case requires evidence that the chosen inspection strategy can support release decisions.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "If inspection is too late, defects flow downstream, contaminate batches, reach customers, or require expensive rework. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: A regulatory, contractual, or safety case requires evidence that the chosen inspection strategy can support release decisions. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A regulatory, contractual, or safety case requires evidence that the chosen inspection strategy can support release decisions.", "If inspection is too late, defects flow downstream, contaminate batches, reach customers, or require expensive rework."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "A regulatory, contractual, or safety case requires evidence that the chosen inspection strategy can support release decisions."}, {"display_text": "Inline automation, sensors, machine vision, or software telemetry have become feasible, changing the cost-benefit balance.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: Inline automation, sensors, machine vision, or software telemetry have become feasible, changing the cost-benefit balance. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Inline automation, sensors, machine vision, or software telemetry have become feasible, changing the cost-benefit balance."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 8, "text": "Inline automation, sensors, machine vision, or software telemetry have become feasible, changing the cost-benefit balance."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 35, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-035", "ledger_sha256": "b2d9cb6a58efe93b2206285661de58066df05438ebedb6523fd83adb353705b9"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Inquiry-Guided Exploration", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:inquiry_guided_exploration", "slug": "inquiry_guided_exploration"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 3, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 3 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is answer dependency. Learners may receive correct information but fail to build the investigative habits and evidence structures needed to understand why the answer holds. They can repeat a conclusion, but they cannot reconstruct the path that produced it, test it against evidence, revise it when conditions change, or transfer it to a new case.\n\nA second version of the problem is unbounded exploration. Learners are encouraged to be curious or independent, but no one defines the question, search boundary, evidence standard, or synthesis requirement. This produces activity without understanding: scattered facts, unsupported opinions, premature solutions, or attractive presentations that do not explain anything.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Learners receive answers without building the investigative habits, evidence structures, or synthesis capacity needed to understand why the answers hold."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P066-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying abstraction must entail a learner or team related to a learned answer.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The knowing role is a learner or team and the object is an answer it has received or learned.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying abstraction must entail successful answer repetition as the positive side of the contrast.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The learner or team can repeat the answer.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying abstraction must preserve the recall-without-understanding asymmetry for the same answer and knower.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Answer repetition is present while explanatory reconstruction is absent.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a satisfying abstraction must entail absence of warrant or derivation reconstruction.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The learner or team cannot explain how the answer was reached.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a satisfying abstraction must entail absence of failure-boundary understanding.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The learner or team cannot explain when the answer would fail.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "A learner or team can repeat an answer but cannot reconstruct either how it was reached or when it would fail.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Answer recall exists without explanatory warrant or failure-boundary understanding.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P066-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Inquiry-based learning is a positive pedagogy and does not require a learner who can already repeat but not explain an answer.", "slug": "inquiry_based_learning"}], "residual_id": "r:inquiry_guided_exploration:b035_a08_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b035_a08_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A learner or team can repeat an answer but cannot explain how the answer was reached or when it would fail. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A learner or team can repeat an answer but cannot explain how the answer was reached or when it would fail."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Inquiry-based learning is a positive pedagogy and does not require a learner who can already repeat but not explain an answer.", "slug": "inquiry_based_learning"}], "normalized_requirement": "A learner can repeat an answer but cannot reconstruct its warrant or failure boundary.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A learner can repeat an answer but cannot reconstruct its warrant or failure boundary.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P066-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying abstraction must entail passive delivery in a learning context, not merely low participation in another domain.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The causal antecedent is passive instructional or answer delivery to learners.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A satisfying abstraction must entail the causal direction from passive delivery to the learning outcome.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Passive delivery produces the specified learning outcome.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a satisfying abstraction must entail shallow compliance as the learning outcome.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The produced outcome is shallow compliance.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a satisfying abstraction must entail memorization as the shallow learning outcome.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The produced outcome is memorization without deeper understanding.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "For this branch, a satisfying abstraction must entail learner dependency on experts.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The produced outcome is dependency on experts.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Passive delivery produces shallow compliance, memorization, or dependency on experts.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Passive instruction produces shallow or dependent learning.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P066-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The zone of proximal development can support deep learning and does not entail passive delivery or dependency.", "slug": "zone_of_proximal_development_zpd"}], "residual_id": "r:inquiry_guided_exploration:b035_a08_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b035_a08_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Passive delivery produces shallow compliance, memorization, or dependency on experts. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Passive delivery produces shallow compliance, memorization, or dependency on experts."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The zone of proximal development can support deep learning and does not entail passive delivery or dependency.", "slug": "zone_of_proximal_development_zpd"}], "normalized_requirement": "Passive delivery produces shallow compliance, memorization, or expert dependency.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Passive delivery produces shallow compliance, memorization, or expert dependency.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P067-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must concern open-ended exploration by learners or equivalent investigators.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Learners engage in open exploration.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must make the open exploration produce actual engagement rather than only permit it.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The exploration generates engagement or enthusiasm.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail absence of evidence credible enough to support the inquiry's result.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The exploration does not produce credible evidence.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail absence of understanding that transfers beyond the immediate exploration.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The exploration does not produce transferable understanding.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail absence of a conclusion supportable by the inquiry's reasoning and evidence.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The exploration does not produce a defensible conclusion.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Open exploration generates engagement without credible evidence, transferable understanding, or a defensible conclusion.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Open exploration produces engagement but no epistemically adequate learning outcome.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P067-C01-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Well-designed inquiry-based learning includes investigation and reflection and need not be unbounded or evidentially weak.", "slug": "inquiry_based_learning"}], "residual_id": "r:inquiry_guided_exploration:b035_a08_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b035_a08_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Open exploration produces enthusiasm but not credible evidence, transferable understanding, or a defensible conclusion. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Open exploration produces enthusiasm but not credible evidence, transferable understanding, or a defensible conclusion."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Well-designed inquiry-based learning includes investigation and reflection and need not be unbounded or evidentially weak.", "slug": "inquiry_based_learning"}], "normalized_requirement": "Open exploration generates engagement without credible evidence, transferable understanding, or defensible conclusions.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Open exploration generates engagement without credible evidence, transferable understanding, or defensible conclusions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The domain involves ambiguity, causal reasoning, conflicting evidence, user needs, diagnosis, design discovery, or scientific explanation.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when the target capability involves explanation, diagnosis, design discovery, scientific reasoning, research, user understanding, incident learning, or professional judgment under ambiguity. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The domain involves ambiguity, causal reasoning, conflicting evidence, user needs, diagnosis, design discovery, or scientific explanation. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The domain involves ambiguity, causal reasoning, conflicting evidence, user needs, diagnosis, design discovery, or scientific explanation.", "It is especially useful when the target capability involves explanation, diagnosis, design discovery, scientific reasoning, research, user understanding, incident learning, or professional judgment under ambiguity."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "The domain involves ambiguity, causal reasoning, conflicting evidence, user needs, diagnosis, design discovery, or scientific explanation."}, {"display_text": "The instructor, mentor, facilitator, or system wants learners to practice investigation without letting them get lost in unbounded search.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Learners are encouraged to be curious or independent, but no one defines the question, search boundary, evidence standard, or synthesis requirement. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: The instructor, mentor, facilitator, or system wants learners to practice investigation without letting them get lost in unbounded search. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The instructor, mentor, facilitator, or system wants learners to practice investigation without letting them get lost in unbounded search.", "Learners are encouraged to be curious or independent, but no one defines the question, search boundary, evidence standard, or synthesis requirement."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The instructor, mentor, facilitator, or system wants learners to practice investigation without letting them get lost in unbounded search."}, {"display_text": "A decision or model should emerge from inquiry, not from authority alone.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: A decision or model should emerge from inquiry, not from authority alone. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A decision or model should emerge from inquiry, not from authority alone."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "A decision or model should emerge from inquiry, not from authority alone."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 35, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-035", "ledger_sha256": "b2d9cb6a58efe93b2206285661de58066df05438ebedb6523fd83adb353705b9"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Instability Dampening", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:instability_dampening", "slug": "instability_dampening"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a high-gain response path. A perturbation enters the system, and then feedback, tight coupling, automation, leverage, attention, scarcity, delayed correction, or social interpretation makes the response larger than the perturbation warrants.\n\nFor example, one failed request can trigger thousands of retries. A small market movement can trigger leveraged selling. A preliminary report can trigger rumor cascades. A minor workflow exception can trigger repeated escalation. In each case, the original disturbance matters, but the larger risk comes from the system’s response dynamics.\n\nThe root tension is responsiveness versus amplification control. A system with no sensitivity misses real problems. A system with too much sensitivity turns noise into crisis.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system treats a small disturbance as fuel for a larger response. Feedback, tight coupling, automation, attention, resource scarcity, leverage, or delayed correction causes minor perturbations to become failures, swings, cascades, panic, or repeated escalation."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact relation specifies a reference state, perturbation class, amplification mechanism, and growing departure.", "role_mapping": "Small disturbance -> perturbation; disproportionate effect -> amplified departure.", "slug": "instability", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b035_a09_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Small disturbances repeatedly produce disproportionate downstream effects. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Small disturbances repeatedly produce disproportionate downstream effects."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Instability", "one_liner": "Amplifies perturbations.", "page_ref": "prime:instability", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Small disturbance -> perturbation; disproportionate effect -> amplified departure.", "slug": "instability", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact relation specifies a reference state, perturbation class, amplification mechanism, and growing departure."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Perturbations to a reference state grow into disproportionate downstream deviations.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Local trigger, coupled transmission, threshold crossing, and renewed propagation at each hop are the exact cascade structure.", "role_mapping": "Local fault or signal -> trigger; cascading reactions -> re-emitting chain.", "slug": "cascade", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b035_a09_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A local exception, fault, rumor, demand spike, or signal causes cascading reactions. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A local exception, fault, rumor, demand spike, or signal causes cascading reactions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Cascade", "one_liner": "A change in one element triggers a chain of further changes.", "page_ref": "prime:cascade", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Local fault or signal -> trigger; cascading reactions -> re-emitting chain.", "slug": "cascade", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Local trigger, coupled transmission, threshold crossing, and renewed propagation at each hop are the exact cascade structure."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A local state change triggers coupled elements to re-emit the disturbance in a chain.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Damping attenuates motion or fluctuation; high gain and low slack describe the opposing amplification-prone configuration.", "slug": "damping"}], "residual_id": "r:instability_dampening:b035_a09_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b035_a09_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The system is tightly coupled, highly leveraged, low on slack, or tuned with high response gain. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The system is tightly coupled, highly leveraged, low on slack, or tuned with high response gain."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Damping attenuates motion or fluctuation; high gain and low slack describe the opposing amplification-prone configuration.", "slug": "damping"}], "normalized_requirement": "Tight coupling, high leverage, low slack, or high response gain makes amplification likely.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Tight coupling, high leverage, low slack, or high response gain makes amplification likely.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P067-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must identify an automated response whose effects propagate beyond an initial event.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An automated response mechanism propagates effects through a system.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the direction in which propagation outruns intervention rather than merely occurring first by chance.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Response propagation is faster than the relevant intervention can act.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must compare automated propagation against verification.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The lagging intervention can be verification.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must compare automated propagation against recovery.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The lagging intervention can be recovery.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must compare automated propagation against human judgment.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The lagging intervention can be human judgment.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "An automated response propagates faster than verification, recovery, or human judgment can intervene.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Automated response propagation outruns corrective intervention.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P067-C02-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A transient response need not involve automation, verification lag, or a human-judgment race.", "slug": "transient_response"}], "residual_id": "r:instability_dampening:b035_a09_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b035_a09_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The response mechanism reacts faster than verification, recovery, or human judgment can catch up. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The response mechanism reacts faster than verification, recovery, or human judgment can catch up."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A transient response need not involve automation, verification lag, or a human-judgment race.", "slug": "transient_response"}], "normalized_requirement": "Automated response propagates faster than verification, recovery, or human judgment can intervene.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Automated response propagates faster than verification, recovery, or human judgment can intervene.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The cost of overreaction or cascade is higher than the cost of a modest damping intervention.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: The cost of overreaction or cascade is higher than the cost of a modest damping intervention. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The cost of overreaction or cascade is higher than the cost of a modest damping intervention."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The cost of overreaction or cascade is higher than the cost of a modest damping intervention."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 35, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-035", "ledger_sha256": "b2d9cb6a58efe93b2206285661de58066df05438ebedb6523fd83adb353705b9"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Institutional Rule–Role Stabilization", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:institutional_rule_role_stabilization", "slug": "institutional_rule_role_stabilization"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 6, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 2, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 2 of 6 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A social, organizational, legal, economic, or platform setting needs repeated coordination, but the rules, roles, expectations, authority, enforcement, and reproduction paths are fragmented, tacit, mistrusted, captured, obsolete, or person-dependent. Participants cannot reliably tell what is expected, who has standing, how conflicts are resolved, or how the arrangement persists after turnover.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A social, organizational, legal, economic, or platform setting needs repeated coordination, but the rules, roles, expectations, authority, enforcement, and reproduction paths are fragmented, tacit, mistrusted, captured, obsolete, or person-dependent. Participants cannot reliably tell what is expected, who has standing, how conflicts are resolved, or how the arrangement persists after turnover."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P067-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"], ["O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must require actual institutional rules.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Institutional rules exist.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail absence of roles that clearly implement or own the existing rules.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The rules lack clear corresponding roles.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must require actual institutional roles.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Institutional roles exist.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail absence of clear rules governing the existing roles.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The roles lack clear corresponding rules.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The role-led branch must also entail absence of clear behavioral expectations for those roles.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The roles lack clear corresponding expectations.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Rules lack corresponding clear roles, or roles lack corresponding clear rules and expectations.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Institutional rules and roles are structurally incomplete counterparts.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P067-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An institution is a functioning complex of rules, roles, expectations, and sanctions; this condition describes its incomplete inverse.", "slug": "institution"}], "residual_id": "r:institutional_rule_role_stabilization:b035_a10_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b035_a10_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The rule-role coupling is incomplete. In this condition set, the requirement is: Rules lack corresponding roles, or roles lack clear rules and expectations.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Rules exist without clear roles, or roles exist without clear rules and expectations."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "If each frontline role had a clear rule and expected action for every generated choice point, the defining grain mismatch would not exist.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Rules-of-Engagement Ambiguity", "one_liner": "Diagnose frontline breakdown under time pressure as a grain mismatch — decision rules written coarser than the environment generates choice points — paid out of a finite discretion budget, relocating the fix from the operator's judgment to the rule, escalation path, and pre-positioned authority.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:rules_of_engagement_ambiguity", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "rules_of_engagement_ambiguity"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "rules_of_engagement_ambiguity", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P067-C03-U1", "why_it_fits": "SSD and counterexample review support the Pass B expression. The exact record requires an institutional actor role facing underspecified rules that yield no decidable answer, directly satisfying the roles-side DNF branch. The exact candidate necessarily gives existing frontline roles rules that fail to yield a decidable action at generated choice points; this directly entails absent clear corresponding rules and behavioral expectations for the O3-O4-O5 branch. No qualifier is used."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Rules lack corresponding roles, or roles lack clear rules and expectations.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P067-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must involve at least two participants evaluating the same expectation system.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Multiple participants hold positions about institutional expectations.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail opposed judgments rather than uncertainty held by only one participant.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The participants disagree about the status of expectations.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must concern disagreement about binding force.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The disputed status can be whether expectations are binding.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must concern disagreement about legitimacy.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The disputed status can be whether expectations are legitimate.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must concern disagreement about optionality.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The disputed status can be whether expectations are optional.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must concern disagreement about obsolescence.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The disputed status can be whether expectations are obsolete.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must concern disagreement about enforceability.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The disputed status can be whether expectations are enforceable.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Participants dispute the institutional status of expectations as binding, legitimate, optional, obsolete, or enforceable.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Participants dispute the institutional status of expectations.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P067-C04-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Governance can operate with settled expectations and does not require an active legitimacy or enforceability dispute.", "slug": "governance"}], "residual_id": "r:institutional_rule_role_stabilization:b035_a10_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b035_a10_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The institution lacks shared expectation governance. In this condition set, the requirement is: Participants dispute which expectations are binding, legitimate, optional, obsolete, or enforceable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Participants disagree about which expectations are binding, legitimate, optional, obsolete, or enforceable."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Governance can operate with settled expectations and does not require an active legitimacy or enforceability dispute.", "slug": "governance"}], "normalized_requirement": "Participants dispute which expectations are binding, legitimate, optional, obsolete, or enforceable.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Participants dispute which expectations are binding, legitimate, optional, obsolete, or enforceable.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P067-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require exercised authority rather than merely a nominal office or possible command.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Authority is actually exercised in the setting.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the universal absence of an articulable source of authority.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "No participant can state the authority's source.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail absence of articulable limits on the exercised authority.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The authority's boundary cannot be stated.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail absence of an articulable route for appealing the exercise of authority.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "An appeal path cannot be stated.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail absence of an articulable mechanism for holding the authority accountable.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "An accountability route cannot be stated.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Authority is exercised although no participant can state its source, boundary, appeal path, or accountability route.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Exercised authority lacks articulable institutional bounds and recourse.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P067-C05-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Authority can be explicit, bounded, appealable, and accountable.", "slug": "authority"}], "residual_id": "r:institutional_rule_role_stabilization:b035_a10_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b035_a10_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Institutional power has drifted from institutional warrant. In this condition set, the requirement is: Authority is exercised without a stated source, boundary, appeal path, or accountability route.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Authority is exercised but no one can state the source, boundary, appeal path, or accountability route."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Authority can be explicit, bounded, appealable, and accountable.", "slug": "authority"}], "normalized_requirement": "Authority is exercised without a stated source, boundary, appeal path, or accountability route.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Authority is exercised without a stated source, boundary, appeal path, or accountability route.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P067-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must concern an informal practice rather than a proposed or already formal rule.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An informal practice is established in the setting.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require persistence or recurrence sufficient to establish the practice.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The informal practice is stable rather than transient.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve consequentiality above the stated stewardship threshold.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The practice has become consequential enough to warrant institutional attention.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail a present stewardship requirement, not merely that stewardship could be useful.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The practice requires explicit stewardship.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "A stable informal practice has become consequential enough to require explicit stewardship.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Consequential informal practice requires explicit stewardship.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P067-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Formalization can make a practice explicit but does not entail prior stable consequential practice or a stewardship requirement.", "slug": "formalization"}], "residual_id": "r:institutional_rule_role_stabilization:b035_a10_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b035_a10_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This boundary overlaps emergent_formalization, but the focus here is durable institutional functioning. In this condition set, the requirement is: A stable informal practice has become consequential enough to require explicit stewardship.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A stable informal practice has become consequential enough that it needs explicit stewardship."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Formalization can make a practice explicit but does not entail prior stable consequential practice or a stewardship requirement.", "slug": "formalization"}], "normalized_requirement": "A stable informal practice has become consequential enough to require explicit stewardship.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A stable informal practice has become consequential enough to require explicit stewardship.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B5", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P067-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O8"], ["O1", "O3", "O7"], ["O1", "O3", "O8"], ["O1", "O4", "O7"], ["O1", "O4", "O8"], ["O1", "O5", "O7"], ["O1", "O5", "O8"], ["O1", "O6", "O7"], ["O1", "O6", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must make the stress expose the knowledge-storage dependency rather than merely coexist with it.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An operational stress reveals where institutional knowledge resides.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must use turnover as the revealing condition.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The revealing stress can be turnover.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must use increased scale as the revealing condition.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The revealing stress can be scale.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must use growth as the revealing condition.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The revealing stress can be growth.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must use crisis as the revealing condition.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The revealing stress can be crisis.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must use platform automation as the revealing condition.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The revealing stress can be platform automation.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail exclusive dependence on current individual knowledge holders.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The institutional knowledge resides only in current individuals.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail exclusive dependence on uncodified tacit culture.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The institutional knowledge resides only in tacit culture.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}], "predicate": "A turnover, scale, growth, crisis, or automation stress reveals that institutional knowledge resides only in individuals or tacit culture.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Operational stress reveals that institutional knowledge lacks a durable explicit store.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P067-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact institution is reproduced across cohorts and outlasts its current enactors; individual-only knowledge is the inverse.", "slug": "institution"}], "residual_id": "r:institutional_rule_role_stabilization:b035_a10_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b035_a10_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Reproduction and memory need formal or semi-formal support. In this condition set, the requirement is: Turnover, scale, growth, crisis, or automation reveals that institutional knowledge resides only in current individuals or tacit culture.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Turnover, scale, growth, crisis, or platform automation exposes that institutional knowledge lived only in individuals or tacit culture."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact institution is reproduced across cohorts and outlasts its current enactors; individual-only knowledge is the inverse.", "slug": "institution"}], "normalized_requirement": "Turnover, scale, growth, crisis, or automation reveals that institutional knowledge resides only in current individuals or tacit culture.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Turnover, scale, growth, crisis, or automation reveals that institutional knowledge resides only in current individuals or tacit culture.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 5", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B6", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The atom gives the authoritative prescription, enacted informal practice, systematic divergence, and load-bearing actual layer.", "role_mapping": "Ceremonial rules -> prescription; informal outcome drivers -> enacted practice; divergence -> mismatch.", "slug": "procedure_work_mismatch", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b035_a10_c7a", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The visible institution and operating institution have diverged. In this condition set, the requirement is: Authoritative procedures and enacted work systematically diverge while informal incentives or power carry actual outcomes.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Existing rules are obeyed ceremonially while informal incentives or hidden power decide outcomes."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Procedure-Work Mismatch", "one_liner": "A system's prescribed model of how work happens diverges systematically from how work is actually done, with the gap often load-bearing for performance, so the question is how the gap is managed rather than whether it can be eliminated.", "page_ref": "prime:procedure_work_mismatch", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Ceremonial rules -> prescription; informal outcome drivers -> enacted practice; divergence -> mismatch.", "slug": "procedure_work_mismatch", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The atom gives the authoritative prescription, enacted informal practice, systematic divergence, and load-bearing actual layer."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Authoritative procedures and enacted work systematically diverge while informal incentives or power carry actual outcomes.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 6", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Coordination must persist beyond a one-time agreement, project, transaction, or leader.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Durability and reproduction are necessary, not optional. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: Coordination must persist beyond a one-time agreement, project, transaction, or leader. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Coordination must persist beyond a one-time agreement, project, transaction, or leader.", "Durability and reproduction are necessary, not optional."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "Coordination must persist beyond a one-time agreement, project, transaction, or leader."}, {"display_text": "The institution must reform without destroying all continuity, trust, and shared orientation.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Stability and adaptation must be jointly managed. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: The institution must reform without destroying all continuity, trust, and shared orientation. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The institution must reform without destroying all continuity, trust, and shared orientation.", "Stability and adaptation must be jointly managed."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 8, "text": "The institution must reform without destroying all continuity, trust, and shared orientation."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 35, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-035", "ledger_sha256": "b2d9cb6a58efe93b2206285661de58066df05438ebedb6523fd83adb353705b9"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Intake Queue Staging", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:intake_queue_staging", "slug": "intake_queue_staging"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is premature admission. Incoming demand crosses the system boundary and enters active service before the system has established whether the item is valid, complete, safe, eligible, urgent, or routed to the right path.\n\nThis causes downstream queues to contain a confusing mixture of ready work, incomplete work, invalid work, duplicate work, urgent work, and out-of-scope work. Active service teams become accidental intake reviewers. They clarify, sort, reject, and redirect instead of doing the work they are designed to do.\n\nThe result is not just delay. It is distorted commitment. Requesters believe the system has accepted work; service teams discover later that the work was never ready; managers read backlog numbers that mix real commitments with unready arrivals.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Incoming work, requests, people, cases, or signals enter active service too early, before the system has determined whether they are complete, eligible, urgent, safe, valid, routable, or worth accepting as a commitment."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact system relates an arrival process, service capacity, waiting population, and utilization-driven delay.", "role_mapping": "Arrival volume -> arrival process; active teams -> servers; waiting work -> queue.", "slug": "queueing", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b035_a11_c1a", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: arrival volume or variety exceeds the ability of active service teams to sort demand while also doing the work. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["arrival volume or variety exceeds the ability of active service teams to sort demand while also doing the work"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Queueing", "one_liner": "Organizes tasks into a waiting line based on arrival and service rates.", "page_ref": "prime:queueing", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Arrival volume -> arrival process; active teams -> servers; waiting work -> queue.", "slug": "queueing", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact system relates an arrival process, service capacity, waiting population, and utilization-driven delay."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Arriving work waits because service and sorting capacity are occupied.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P067-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O9"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must concern incoming requests or equivalent items entering a service process.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Requests arrive at a service intake.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require recurrent defective arrivals rather than one exceptional bad request.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The defective arrivals occur frequently.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must concern recurrent incomplete arrivals.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "An arriving request can be incomplete.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must concern recurrent ambiguous arrivals.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "An arriving request can be ambiguous.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must concern recurrent duplicated arrivals.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "An arriving request can be duplicated.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must concern recurrent invalid arrivals.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "An arriving request can be invalid.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must concern recurrent unauthorized arrivals.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "An arriving request can be unauthorized.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must concern recurrent premature arrivals.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "An arriving request can be premature.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must concern recurrent misdirected arrivals.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "An arriving request can be misdirected.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Requests frequently arrive with an incompleteness, ambiguity, duplication, validity, authorization, timing, or routing defect.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Service intake recurrently receives defective requests.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P067-C08-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A queue can contain complete, valid, correctly directed tasks and does not entail intake-quality defects.", "slug": "queueing"}], "residual_id": "r:intake_queue_staging:b035_a11_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b035_a11_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: requests frequently arrive incomplete, ambiguous, duplicated, invalid, unauthorized, premature, or misdirected. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["requests frequently arrive incomplete, ambiguous, duplicated, invalid, unauthorized, premature, or misdirected"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A queue can contain complete, valid, correctly directed tasks and does not entail intake-quality defects.", "slug": "queueing"}], "normalized_requirement": "Arrivals are frequently incomplete, ambiguous, duplicated, invalid, unauthorized, premature, or misdirected.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Arrivals are frequently incomplete, ambiguous, duplicated, invalid, unauthorized, premature, or misdirected.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P067-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require heterogeneous service paths rather than interchangeable routes.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The available service paths differ materially.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must link misrouting to an actual costly consequence in the stated direction.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A routing error among those paths causes a costly process consequence.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail costly rework caused by the routing error.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The costly consequence can be rework.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail costly delay caused by the routing error.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The costly consequence can be delay.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail costly handoff churn caused by the routing error.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The costly consequence can be handoff churn.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Heterogeneous service paths make routing errors cause costly rework, delay, or handoff churn.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Service-path heterogeneity makes routing errors costly.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P067-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Queueing does not require multiple service paths or misrouting between them.", "slug": "queueing"}], "residual_id": "r:intake_queue_staging:b035_a11_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b035_a11_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: service paths differ enough that routing mistakes create expensive rework, delay, or handoff churn. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["service paths differ enough that routing mistakes create expensive rework, delay, or handoff churn"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Queueing does not require multiple service paths or misrouting between them.", "slug": "queueing"}], "normalized_requirement": "Service paths differ enough that routing errors create costly rework, delay, or handoff churn.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Service paths differ enough that routing errors create costly rework, delay, or handoff churn.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P067-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must concern unqualified incoming demand rather than an already accepted service obligation.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Raw demand enters a service system.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail conversion or treatment of demand as an actual service commitment.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The raw demand is interpreted as a commitment.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve insufficient capacity at the moment commitment is inferred.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The system lacks sufficient capacity when commitment is inferred.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve insufficient information at the moment commitment is inferred.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The system lacks sufficient information when commitment is inferred.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the premature ordering relative to both missing prerequisites.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Commitment is inferred before both capacity and information become sufficient.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "Raw demand is interpreted as a service commitment before the system has sufficient capacity and information.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Unqualified demand is prematurely converted into commitment.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P067-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A decoupling point postpones commitment but does not entail that raw requests are already misread as commitments.", "slug": "decoupling_point"}], "residual_id": "r:intake_queue_staging:b035_a11_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b035_a11_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: raw demand creates a false sense of commitment before the system has capacity or sufficient information. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["raw demand creates a false sense of commitment before the system has capacity or sufficient information"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A well-founded backorder with a highly reliable replenishment date is a deliberate deferred commitment, not the source’s information-insufficient premature conversion.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Backorder", "one_liner": "The fulfilment arrangement in which an order is accepted as a binding obligation despite a stock-out, becoming a queued claim against future supply tracked in a visible ledger and clocked against an estimated resupply, rather than being refused as a lost sale.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:backorder", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O4", "O5"], "guard_type": "THRESHOLD_CROSSING", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "backorder_resupply_estimate_insufficient_at_acceptance", "predicate": "At acceptance, the backorder’s resupply estimate is too unreliable to support commitment.", "rationale": "The single guard tests one threshold at the candidate's explicitly named acceptance time on its resupply estimate. Stock-out, demand acceptance, and commitment are DSA-supplied, so the qualifier neither restates the head nor adds another principal relation."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "backorder"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "At acceptance, the backorder’s resupply estimate is too unreliable to support commitment."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "backorder", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P067-C10-U1", "why_it_fits": "SSD and counterexample review support the Pass B expression. Backorder directly supplies intake, commitment, and capacity shortfall. One threshold-and-timing qualifier on its existing lead-time estimate supplies insufficient information and premature timing. The single guard tests one threshold at the candidate's explicitly named acceptance time on its resupply estimate. Stock-out, demand acceptance, and commitment are DSA-supplied, so the qualifier neither restates the head nor adds another principal relation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Raw demand is interpreted as commitment before capacity and information are sufficient.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P067-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the prospective risk of loss rather than require that disappearance has already occurred.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A priority arrival can lose its priority salience after entering a general queue.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must identify a queue that does not intrinsically preserve the arrival's priority class.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The receiving queue is a general undifferentiated work queue.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the recognition-before-loss ordering.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Priority recognition must occur before the arrival disappears into the queue.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must apply the queue-loss risk to a high-risk arrival.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The priority arrival can be high-risk.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must apply the queue-loss risk to an urgent arrival.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The priority arrival can be urgent.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "A priority arrival can disappear into an undifferentiated general work queue unless recognized beforehand.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Priority arrivals risk losing salience in a general queue.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P067-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Incident response can be activated correctly and does not entail loss inside a general queue.", "slug": "incident_response"}], "residual_id": "r:intake_queue_staging:b035_a11_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b035_a11_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: high-risk or urgent arrivals must be recognized before they disappear into a general work queue. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["high-risk or urgent arrivals must be recognized before they disappear into a general work queue"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Incident response can be activated correctly and does not entail loss inside a general queue.", "slug": "incident_response"}], "normalized_requirement": "Urgent or high-risk arrivals can disappear into an undifferentiated general work queue.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Urgent or high-risk arrivals can disappear into an undifferentiated general work queue.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P067-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must identify items admitted beyond intake into a downstream work queue.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Requests occupy a downstream service queue.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail harmful or obstructive queue occupancy, not merely legitimate queued work.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The improperly admitted requests clutter the downstream queue.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must require return as the proper prior disposition.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A request should instead have been returned at intake.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must require deferral as the proper prior disposition.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A request should instead have been deferred at intake.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must require clarification as the proper prior disposition.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "A request should instead have been clarified at intake.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must require alternate routing as the proper prior disposition.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "A request should instead have been routed elsewhere at intake.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "Downstream queues contain cluttering requests whose proper prior disposition was return, deferral, clarification, or routing elsewhere.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Unqualified intake clutters downstream queues.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P067-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A decoupling point can keep only qualified items downstream and does not require existing queue clutter.", "slug": "decoupling_point"}], "residual_id": "r:intake_queue_staging:b035_a11_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b035_a11_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: downstream queues are cluttered with items that should have been returned, deferred, clarified, or routed elsewhere. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["downstream queues are cluttered with items that should have been returned, deferred, clarified, or routed elsewhere"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A decoupling point can keep only qualified items downstream and does not require existing queue clutter.", "slug": "decoupling_point"}], "normalized_requirement": "Downstream queues contain requests that should have been returned, deferred, clarified, or routed elsewhere.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Downstream queues contain requests that should have been returned, deferred, clarified, or routed elsewhere.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 35, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-035", "ledger_sha256": "b2d9cb6a58efe93b2206285661de58066df05438ebedb6523fd83adb353705b9"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Integrated Work Partitioning", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:integrated_work_partitioning", "slug": "integrated_work_partitioning"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A joint activity is too complex, varied, time-sensitive, geographically distributed, knowledge-intensive, or capacity-constrained to be handled effectively by an undifferentiated performer or by everyone doing the same work. Yet arbitrary splitting creates handoff loss, duplicated effort, role conflict, bottlenecks, and outputs that cannot be recombined.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A joint activity is too complex, varied, time-sensitive, geographically distributed, knowledge-intensive, or capacity-constrained to be handled effectively by an undifferentiated performer or by everyone doing the same work. Yet arbitrary splitting creates handoff loss, duplicated effort, role conflict, bottlenecks, and outputs that cannot be recombined."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Partitioning a joint productive task into distinct sub-tasks is the first mandatory move.", "role_mapping": "Joint work -> productive task; separable functions -> sub-task partition.", "slug": "division_of_labor", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b035_a12_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The work contains separable functions, stages, skills, resource requirements, territories, or temporal windows that can be treated as distinct sub-tasks. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The work contains separable functions, stages, skills, resource requirements, territories, or temporal windows that can be treated as distinct sub-tasks."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Division of Labor", "one_liner": "Partition a joint activity into specialized sub-tasks assigned to distinct performers whose outputs are then re-integrated.", "page_ref": "prime:division_of_labor", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Joint work -> productive task; separable functions -> sub-task partition.", "slug": "division_of_labor", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Partitioning a joint productive task into distinct sub-tasks is the first mandatory move."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A joint activity contains distinct sub-tasks that can be assigned separately.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact structure assigns sub-tasks to differentiated performers and concentrates capability by assignment.", "role_mapping": "Different performers -> differentiated units; capability differences -> concentrated execution.", "slug": "division_of_labor", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b035_a12_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Different performers have different capabilities, costs, authorities, tools, local knowledge, access, or learning curves. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Different performers have different capabilities, costs, authorities, tools, local knowledge, access, or learning curves."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Division of Labor", "one_liner": "Partition a joint activity into specialized sub-tasks assigned to distinct performers whose outputs are then re-integrated.", "page_ref": "prime:division_of_labor", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Different performers -> differentiated units; capability differences -> concentrated execution.", "slug": "division_of_labor", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact structure assigns sub-tasks to differentiated performers and concentrates capability by assignment."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Differentiated performers have distinct capabilities, costs, authorities, tools, knowledge, access, or learning curves.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Coordinated reintegration of differentiated partial outputs into the final product is mandatory.", "role_mapping": "Specialized outputs -> partial products; interact or assemble -> coordinated reintegration.", "slug": "division_of_labor", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b035_a12_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Specialized outputs must later interact, assemble, synchronize, or inform one another. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Specialized outputs must later interact, assemble, synchronize, or inform one another."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Division of Labor", "one_liner": "Partition a joint activity into specialized sub-tasks assigned to distinct performers whose outputs are then re-integrated.", "page_ref": "prime:division_of_labor", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Specialized outputs -> partial products; interact or assemble -> coordinated reintegration.", "slug": "division_of_labor", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Coordinated reintegration of differentiated partial outputs into the final product is mandatory."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Specialized partial outputs must interact, synchronize, or be reintegrated into a joint result.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P067-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must concern an existing collaboration rather than only a proposed division of work.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A collaboration already exists among partitioned contributors.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must make interface ambiguity cause actual collaboration harm.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Ambiguity at a work-partition interface impairs the collaboration.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must locate the ambiguity in responsibility boundaries.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The ambiguous interface can be responsibility boundaries.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must locate the ambiguity in handoff expectations.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The ambiguous interface can be handoff expectations.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must locate the ambiguity in reintegration points.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The ambiguous interface can be reintegration points.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Existing collaboration is impaired by ambiguity in responsibility boundaries, handoff expectations, or reintegration points.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Ambiguous work-partition interfaces impair collaboration.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P067-C13-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A division of labor can have explicit responsibilities and well-defined interfaces; ambiguity is not required.", "slug": "division_of_labor"}], "residual_id": "r:integrated_work_partitioning:b035_a12_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b035_a12_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Existing collaboration suffers because responsibility boundaries, handoff expectations, or reintegration points are ambiguous. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Existing collaboration suffers because responsibility boundaries, handoff expectations, or reintegration points are ambiguous."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A handoff can lose an unambiguous factual datum while expectations remain perfectly clear; the guard excludes that adjacent failure mode.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Handoff Loss", "one_liner": "Locate post-transition failures at the transfer relation itself: work crossing a boundary between actors arrives degraded because a bounded artifact cannot carry the sender's tacit state, so downstream decisions run on an impoverished reconstruction.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:handoff_loss", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2", "O4"], "guard_type": "OTHER", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "lost_handoff_context_ambiguates_expectations", "predicate": "The lost handoff context leaves the transfer artifact ambiguous about handoff expectations.", "rationale": "The single guard selects one type of the candidate's existing lost-context role—ambiguity about handoff expectations. Existing collaborators, the transfer boundary, loss-caused degradation, and actual downstream impairment remain DSA-supplied, so the guard is sufficient and non-laundering."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "handoff_loss"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The lost handoff context leaves the transfer artifact ambiguous about handoff expectations."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "handoff_loss", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P067-C13-U1", "why_it_fits": "SSD and counterexample review support the Pass B expression. The DSA directly supplies collaboration across a work boundary and impairment from a degraded handoff. One candidate-anchored qualifier selects the handoff-expectations ambiguity branch. The single guard selects one type of the candidate's existing lost-context role—ambiguity about handoff expectations. Existing collaborators, the transfer boundary, loss-caused degradation, and actual downstream impairment remain DSA-supplied, so the guard is sufficient and non-laundering."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Responsibility boundaries, handoff expectations, or reintegration points are ambiguous.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P067-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require actual path-dependent silo formation rather than deliberate partitioning by design.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A system has drifted into silos accidentally.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail a present need to redesign the partition boundaries.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The accidental silos require deliberate repartition.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail a present need to restore intentional interfaces across the partitions.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The accidental silos require deliberate reconnection.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the paired architecture rather than satisfy only separation or only connection.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Repartition and reconnection form one coordinated architecture response to the silo condition.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "A system's drift into accidental silos creates a need for deliberate repartition and reconnection.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Accidental silo drift requires deliberate repartition and reconnection.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P067-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A division of labor is deliberate partition-and-reintegration and does not entail accidental silo formation.", "slug": "division_of_labor"}], "residual_id": "r:integrated_work_partitioning:b035_a12_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b035_a12_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A system has drifted into accidental silos and needs a deliberate partitioning-and-reconnection architecture. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A system has drifted into accidental silos and needs a deliberate partitioning-and-reconnection architecture."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A division of labor is deliberate partition-and-reintegration and does not entail accidental silo formation.", "slug": "division_of_labor"}], "normalized_requirement": "Accidental silos must be repartitioned and deliberately reconnected.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Accidental silos must be repartitioned and deliberately reconnected.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The activity needs more throughput, depth of expertise, continuity, reliability, or parallelism than a single undifferentiated arrangement can provide.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A joint activity is too complex, varied, time-sensitive, geographically distributed, knowledge-intensive, or capacity-constrained to be handled effectively by an undifferentiated performer or by everyone doing the same work. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The activity needs more throughput, depth of expertise, continuity, reliability, or parallelism than a single undifferentiated arrangement can provide. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The activity needs more throughput, depth of expertise, continuity, reliability, or parallelism than a single undifferentiated arrangement can provide.", "A joint activity is too complex, varied, time-sensitive, geographically distributed, knowledge-intensive, or capacity-constrained to be handled effectively by an undifferentiated performer or by everyone doing the same work."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "The activity needs more throughput, depth of expertise, continuity, reliability, or parallelism than a single undifferentiated arrangement can provide."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 35, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-035", "ledger_sha256": "b2d9cb6a58efe93b2206285661de58066df05438ebedb6523fd83adb353705b9"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Intellectual-Humility Narrative Integration", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:intellectual_humility_narrative_integration", "slug": "intellectual_humility_narrative_integration"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "An individual, team, institution, or expert community wants better epistemic humility, but its identity narrative still equates authority with certainty, treats error as shame, or rewards confident fluency more than warranted belief. As a result, people avoid saying “I do not know,” hide revisions, suppress anomalies, or present fragile claims with excessive confidence.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "An individual, team, institution, or expert community wants better epistemic humility, but its identity narrative still equates authority with certainty, treats error as shame, or rewards confident fluency more than warranted belief. As a result, people avoid saying “I do not know,” hide revisions, suppress anomalies, or present fragile claims with excessive confidence."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P067-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must make the standing stake cause reluctance rather than merely coexist with silence.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A social-standing stake makes people reluctant to acknowledge uncertainty.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve inhibited willingness to admit uncertainty, not require complete inability or actual false certainty.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "People are reluctant to acknowledge their uncertainty.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must make status the cause of reluctance.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The inhibiting stake can be status.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must make authority the cause of reluctance.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The inhibiting stake can be authority.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must make reputation the cause of reluctance.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The inhibiting stake can be reputation.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Status, authority, or reputation makes people reluctant to acknowledge uncertainty.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Social standing suppresses acknowledgment of uncertainty.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P067-C15-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P067-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must make the standing stake cause reluctance rather than merely coexist with a stable claim.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A social-standing stake makes people reluctant to revise a visible claim.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve inhibited willingness to revise rather than require that revision is impossible.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "People are reluctant to revise a publicly visible claim.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must make status the cause of reluctance.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The inhibiting stake can be status.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must make authority the cause of reluctance.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The inhibiting stake can be authority.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must make reputation the cause of reluctance.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The inhibiting stake can be reputation.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Status, authority, or reputation makes people reluctant to revise a visible claim.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Social standing suppresses revision of visible claims.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P067-C15-U2"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Epistemic humility is calibrated openness to revision; reluctance created by status is its contextual inverse.", "slug": "epistemic_humility"}], "residual_id": "r:intellectual_humility_narrative_integration:b035_a13_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b035_a13_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Status, authority, or reputation makes people reluctant to admit uncertainty or revise a visible claim. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Status, authority, or reputation makes people reluctant to admit uncertainty or revise a visible claim."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PARTIALLY_DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A wholly private identity-bound belief can resist revision without any public reputation stake; the guard excludes that case.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Backfire Effect", "one_liner": "The phenomenon in which evidence contradicting an identity-bound belief produces not revision but firmer commitment, because the challenge is processed as an attack on self and parried by counter-arguing that rehearses and strengthens the original position.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:backfire_effect", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1", "O5"], "guard_type": "TYPE_SUBSUMPTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "identity_belief_is_public_reputation_badge", "predicate": "The identity-bound belief is a publicly visible reputation badge.", "rationale": "The guard performs one role-typing restriction on the candidate's identity-bound belief, making the same badge publicly visible and reputation-bearing. Identity-protective causal suppression of revision is already exact-record structure, so no second fact or head restatement is introduced."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "backfire_effect"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The identity-bound belief is a publicly visible reputation badge."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "backfire_effect", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P067-C15-U2", "why_it_fits": "SSD and counterexample review support the Pass B expression. Backfire directly supplies inhibited revision caused by an identity stake. One role-typing qualifier narrows the candidate’s named identity-badge structure to the reputation branch and public visibility. The guard performs one role-typing restriction on the candidate's identity-bound belief, making the same badge publicly visible and reputation-bearing. Identity-protective causal suppression of revision is already exact-record structure, so no second fact or head restatement is introduced."}], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 2, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 1, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Epistemic humility is calibrated openness to revision; reluctance created by status is its contextual inverse.", "slug": "epistemic_humility"}], "normalized_requirement": "Status, authority, or reputation makes people reluctant to acknowledge uncertainty or revise visible claims.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "PARTIAL_EXISTING_DSA_GROUNDING", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation grounded 1 of 2 eligible atomic units; the remaining unit or units stayed open."}, "predicate": "Status, authority, or reputation makes people reluctant to acknowledge uncertainty or revise visible claims.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P068-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must identify a narrative shared within a group rather than one person's private memory.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A group maintains a shared narrative.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail exclusion or failure of integration despite the event containing a lesson.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A lesson-bearing epistemic event is not integrated into that narrative.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must concern a lesson from a past mistake.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The lesson-bearing event can be a past mistake.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must concern a lesson from a failed prediction.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The lesson-bearing event can be a failed prediction.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must concern a lesson from an anomaly.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The lesson-bearing event can be an anomaly.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Lessons contained in mistakes, failed predictions, or anomalies do not enter the group's shared narrative.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A group narrative excludes lessons from epistemic failures.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P068-C01-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Historical narrative construction need not omit errors or concern organizational learning.", "slug": "narrative_construction_in_history"}], "residual_id": "r:intellectual_humility_narrative_integration:b035_a13_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b035_a13_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Past mistakes, failed predictions, or anomalies contain lessons but are not becoming part of the group’s shared story. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Past mistakes, failed predictions, or anomalies contain lessons but are not becoming part of the group’s shared story."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Historical narrative construction need not omit errors or concern organizational learning.", "slug": "narrative_construction_in_history"}], "normalized_requirement": "Lessons from mistakes, failed predictions, or anomalies do not enter the group's shared narrative.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Lessons from mistakes, failed predictions, or anomalies do not enter the group's shared narrative.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P068-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must concern norm acquisition by newcomers rather than expression by established members only.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Newcomers learn the group's certainty norms.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must make stories, exemplars, rituals, rewards, or equivalent cultural signals teach the norms.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Informal cultural signals transmit the certainty norms.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must include formal policy as the comparison channel rather than omit the formal layer.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Formal policies also communicate standards relevant to the norms.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the direction in which informal enculturation outpaces formal policy.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Learning through informal signals occurs faster than learning through formal policies.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Newcomers learn informal certainty norms through cultural signals faster than through formal policy.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Informal cultural transmission of certainty norms outpaces formal policy.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P068-C02-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Epistemic humility need not be transmitted through stories, rituals, or promotion signals.", "slug": "epistemic_humility"}], "residual_id": "r:intellectual_humility_narrative_integration:b035_a13_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b035_a13_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Newcomers learn informal certainty norms from stories, heroes, rituals, and promotion signals more quickly than from formal policies. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Newcomers learn informal certainty norms from stories, heroes, rituals, and promotion signals more quickly than from formal policies."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Epistemic humility need not be transmitted through stories, rituals, or promotion signals.", "slug": "epistemic_humility"}], "normalized_requirement": "Newcomers learn certainty norms through stories, heroes, rituals, and promotion signals faster than through policy.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Newcomers learn certainty norms through stories, heroes, rituals, and promotion signals faster than through policy.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A group depends on expert judgment, forecasting, interpretation, or learning from uncertain evidence.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: A group depends on expert judgment, forecasting, interpretation, or learning from uncertain evidence. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A group depends on expert judgment, forecasting, interpretation, or learning from uncertain evidence."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "A group depends on expert judgment, forecasting, interpretation, or learning from uncertain evidence."}, {"display_text": "Leaders, teachers, experts, or mentors need to model how credible people handle doubt and correction.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Epistemic humility improves truth-seeking and learning, but visible humility can threaten status, authority, identity, and trust unless the culture has a story that makes correction and uncertainty credible. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: Leaders, teachers, experts, or mentors need to model how credible people handle doubt and correction. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Leaders, teachers, experts, or mentors need to model how credible people handle doubt and correction.", "Epistemic humility improves truth-seeking and learning, but visible humility can threaten status, authority, identity, and trust unless the culture has a story that makes correction and uncertainty credible."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Leaders, teachers, experts, or mentors need to model how credible people handle doubt and correction."}, {"display_text": "Stakeholders need trust-preserving communication that distinguishes humility from incompetence or indecision.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Epistemic humility improves truth-seeking and learning, but visible humility can threaten status, authority, identity, and trust unless the culture has a story that makes correction and uncertainty credible. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: Stakeholders need trust-preserving communication that distinguishes humility from incompetence or indecision. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders need trust-preserving communication that distinguishes humility from incompetence or indecision.", "Epistemic humility improves truth-seeking and learning, but visible humility can threaten status, authority, identity, and trust unless the culture has a story that makes correction and uncertainty credible."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Stakeholders need trust-preserving communication that distinguishes humility from incompetence or indecision."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 35, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-035", "ledger_sha256": "b2d9cb6a58efe93b2206285661de58066df05438ebedb6523fd83adb353705b9"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Interaction Effect Mapping", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:interaction_effect_mapping", "slug": "interaction_effect_mapping"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 3, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 2, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 2 of 3 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is hidden non-additivity. The system is being reasoned about as if each factor contributes its own separable effect, but the real outcome depends on the relation among factors.\n\nThis creates several recurring errors. Teams overestimate bundles because each part worked alone. They miss synergies because the right pair was never tested. They blame one factor for failure when the problem was the pairing. They generalize evidence from one context to another without noticing that a co-factor has changed.\n\nInteraction Effect Mapping addresses that problem by shifting the unit of evaluation from isolated factors to factor combinations.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system contains multiple potentially interacting factors, but decisions are being made as if each factor's effect can be understood independently. The hidden risk is that combinations may produce amplified benefit, destructive interference, masked harm, or context-dependent reversals."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P068-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require an observed effect rather than a merely hypothesized interaction.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An effect has been observed in past results.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail substantial variation in magnitude or sign, not small random fluctuation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The observed effect varies sharply rather than remaining stable.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must compare the effect across contexts.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The sharp variation can occur across contexts.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must compare the effect across populations.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The sharp variation can occur across populations.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Observed effects vary sharply across contexts or populations.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Observed effect magnitude or sign is sharply setting-dependent.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P068-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A crossover interaction specifically requires effect reversal across levels; sharp variation alone may preserve sign and ordering.", "slug": "crossover_interaction"}], "residual_id": "r:interaction_effect_mapping:b035_a14_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b035_a14_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Past results vary sharply across contexts or populations. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Past results vary sharply across contexts or populations."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_GUARDED_EQUIVALENT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A valid carryover effect can be small when washout is nearly adequate. That preserves the DSA but fails sharpness; the emitted threshold excludes exactly that counterexample.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Carryover Effect", "one_liner": "The validity threat in crossover and within-subject designs where residual influence from an earlier treatment persists into a later measurement window, biasing the contrast — its magnitude set by the unit's relaxation time against the inter-treatment gap.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:carryover_effect", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2"], "guard_type": "THRESHOLD_CROSSING", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "carryover_contrast_varies_sharply", "predicate": "The carryover-induced contrast is sharp across treatment-sequence contexts.", "rationale": "Publication safety passes: every complete candidate instance satisfying the one atomic candidate-anchored qualifier necessarily satisfies a full DNF branch, and the qualifier adds no role or unrelated relation."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "carryover_effect"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "carryover_contrast_varies_sharply"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "carryover_effect", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P068-C03-U1", "why_it_fits": "Carryover directly supplies an observed context-indexed contrast; one threshold fact supplies only the otherwise open sharpness requirement."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A modest transient that decays slightly toward baseline is still a novelty effect but does not vary sharply. The guard excludes that complete counterexample.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Novelty Effect", "one_liner": "Recognise that a newly introduced stimulus draws an elevated response tied to its recency, not its intrinsic worth, which decays near-exponentially toward a steady-state baseline — so short-window evaluation systematically over-estimates the intervention's lasting effect.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:novelty_effect", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2"], "guard_type": "THRESHOLD_CROSSING", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "novelty_contrast_is_sharp", "predicate": "The observed novelty-effect contrast is sharp across early and steady-state contexts.", "rationale": "Publication safety passes: every complete candidate instance satisfying the one atomic candidate-anchored qualifier necessarily satisfies a full DNF branch, and the qualifier adds no role or unrelated relation."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "novelty_effect"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "novelty_contrast_is_sharp"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "novelty_effect", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P068-C03-U1", "why_it_fits": "Novelty effect supplies observed context-dependent response variation, but a small novelty transient remains possible; the threshold guard binds the required sharpness."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A homogeneous dose-dependent response would falsify the branch, but the exact record excludes it from the idiosyncratic-reaction class; no complete counterexample remains.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Idiosyncratic Reaction", "one_liner": "Classify a rare drug harm as a distinct causal category — dose-independent, qualitatively different in kind, and confined to a small biologically-defined susceptible tail — so it is understood not as too-much-drug but as uniform exposure meeting a heterogeneous responder population.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:idiosyncratic_reaction", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "idiosyncratic_reaction"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "idiosyncratic_reaction", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P068-C03-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every idiosyncratic reaction is an observed, qualitatively distinct response confined to a biologically defined population tail, satisfying the population branch directly."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A purely mechanistic prospective contraindication preserves the DSA without any observed past result. The emitted evidential guard excludes precisely that counterexample.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Contraindication", "one_liner": "Flag the sparse patient conditions under which a normally-indicated treatment becomes inadvisable, by naming the specific context in which its risk-benefit balance flips sign.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:contraindication", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "MODALITY_ACTUALIZATION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "contraindication_observed_in_past_results", "predicate": "The contraindication is established by observed past treatment results.", "rationale": "Publication safety passes: every complete candidate instance satisfying the one atomic candidate-anchored qualifier necessarily satisfies a full DNF branch, and the qualifier adds no role or unrelated relation."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "contraindication"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "contraindication_observed_in_past_results"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "contraindication", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P068-C03-U1", "why_it_fits": "Contraindication directly supplies a context-dependent sign flip; one modality-actualization fact is needed because a contraindication can otherwise be established prospectively."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A systematic but tiny small-versus-large study difference remains a small-study effect yet is not sharp. The threshold guard excludes that valid counterexample.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Small-Study Effects", "one_liner": "The meta-analytic pattern in which smaller studies report systematically larger effects than larger ones, producing funnel-plot asymmetry that inflates the pooled estimate — a shared symptom of several biases, not a diagnosis of any one cause.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:small_study_effects", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2"], "guard_type": "THRESHOLD_CROSSING", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "study_size_effect_difference_is_sharp", "predicate": "The small-versus-large-study effect difference is sharp across study-size contexts.", "rationale": "Publication safety passes: every complete candidate instance satisfying the one atomic candidate-anchored qualifier necessarily satisfies a full DNF branch, and the qualifier adds no role or unrelated relation."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "small_study_effects"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "study_size_effect_difference_is_sharp"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "small_study_effects", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P068-C03-U1", "why_it_fits": "Small-study effects directly supplies an observed effect-size contrast across study-size contexts; one scalar threshold is sufficient for sharpness."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_GUARDED_EQUIVALENT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A statistically systematic but tiny cohort contrast preserves the DSA while failing sharpness. The threshold guard excludes exactly that counterexample.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Cohort Effect", "one_liner": "An observed outcome difference associated with membership in groups defined by a shared birth or entry interval, kept distinct from aging, period shocks, and any unproven causal account of the cohort contrast.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:cohort_effect", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2"], "guard_type": "THRESHOLD_CROSSING", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "cohort_contrast_is_sharp", "predicate": "The observed between-cohort contrast is sharp across the compared populations.", "rationale": "Publication safety passes: every complete candidate instance satisfying the one atomic candidate-anchored qualifier necessarily satisfies a full DNF branch, and the qualifier adds no role or unrelated relation."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "cohort_effect"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "cohort_contrast_is_sharp"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "cohort_effect", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P068-C03-U1", "why_it_fits": "Cohort effect directly supplies an observed population-indexed difference; one threshold fact separates sharp instances from merely systematic ones."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_SYNTHESIS", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A mildly ambiguous stimulus can produce a small perceptual-set bias while preserving the DSA. The threshold guard excludes that complete non-sharp instance.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Perceptual Set", "one_liner": "Explain how prior expectation, context, motivation, or expertise biases what is perceived from ambiguous or degraded input — the percept is the prior weighted by how decisive the sensory evidence is, so the expectation dominates precisely when the stimulus underdetermines it.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:perceptual_set", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2"], "guard_type": "THRESHOLD_CROSSING", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "perceptual_set_contrast_is_sharp", "predicate": "The perceptual-set bias contrast is sharp across ambiguous and decisive sensory contexts.", "rationale": "Publication safety passes: every complete candidate instance satisfying the one atomic candidate-anchored qualifier necessarily satisfies a full DNF branch, and the qualifier adds no role or unrelated relation."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "perceptual_set"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "perceptual_set_contrast_is_sharp"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "perceptual_set", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P068-C03-U1", "why_it_fits": "Perceptual set supplies an observed bias whose magnitude is indexed to sensory-context decisiveness; a single threshold is needed because weak context effects remain valid instances."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_SYNTHESIS", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A small but reliable switch cost is a complete DSA instance that is not sharp. The emitted threshold excludes that counterexample without adding another relation.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Task-Switching Cost", "one_liner": "Isolate the performance penalty paid at the moment of changing between rule-sets — separate from either task's steady-state difficulty — by contrasting switch trials against repeat trials in the same mixed block, and split it into a preparation-reducible part and an irreducible residual.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:task_switching_cost", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2"], "guard_type": "THRESHOLD_CROSSING", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "switch_cost_contrast_is_sharp", "predicate": "The switch-versus-repeat performance contrast is sharp across trial contexts.", "rationale": "Publication safety passes: every complete candidate instance satisfying the one atomic candidate-anchored qualifier necessarily satisfies a full DNF branch, and the qualifier adds no role or unrelated relation."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "task_switching_cost"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "switch_cost_contrast_is_sharp"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "task_switching_cost", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P068-C03-U1", "why_it_fits": "Task-switching cost directly supplies an observed performance contrast across trial contexts; one threshold fact supplies only the required sharpness."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A sound-location bias that remains unchanged beyond the binding windows would falsify sharp setting dependence, but the exact DSA excludes it; no complete counterexample survives.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Ventriloquism Effect", "one_liner": "A sound is mislocalised toward a synchronised visual event when the brain infers a common cause, because vision's lower spatial uncertainty pulls the merged location estimate toward it by inverse-variance weighting — gated by temporal and spatial binding windows beyond which the percept splits.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:ventriloquism_effect", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "ventriloquism_effect"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "ventriloquism_effect", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P068-C03-U1", "why_it_fits": "The effect is defined by a context-gated transition: visual capture inside the binding windows and perceptual splitting beyond them, directly satisfying the context branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A route familiarity contrast with the same error sign in both settings would falsify the unit, but it would not instantiate the exact under-versus-over DSA.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Well-Travelled Road Effect", "one_liner": "People underestimate the duration of familiar routes and overestimate equally long unfamiliar ones, because retrospective duration is reconstructed from the count of distinct, attention-demanding event traces memory retained — few for automatic familiar travel, many for novel decision-dense travel.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:well_travelled_road_effect", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "well_travelled_road_effect"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "well_travelled_road_effect", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P068-C03-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record defines opposite-signed duration errors in matched familiar and unfamiliar settings, directly entailing sharp setting dependence."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Observed effects vary sharply across contexts or populations.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact antagonistic case is a joint effect below an additive, multiplicative, or domain-specific baseline.", "role_mapping": "Useful elements -> individual effects; underperformance together -> negative deviation from combination baseline.", "slug": "synergy_and_antagonism", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b035_a14_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Two useful elements appear to underperform when deployed together. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Two useful elements appear to underperform when deployed together."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Synergy and Antagonism", "one_liner": "Amplified or diminished effects.", "page_ref": "prime:synergy_and_antagonism", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Useful elements -> individual effects; underperformance together -> negative deviation from combination baseline.", "slug": "synergy_and_antagonism", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact antagonistic case is a joint effect below an additive, multiplicative, or domain-specific baseline."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Two individually useful elements produce a combined effect below the specified no-interaction baseline.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact relation requires a measured or specified deviation from a defined joint-effect baseline; plausibility alone is insufficient.", "slug": "synergy_and_antagonism"}], "residual_id": "r:interaction_effect_mapping:b035_a14_c5", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b035_a14_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: There are plausible dependency, compatibility, or dose interactions. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["There are plausible dependency, compatibility, or dose interactions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact relation requires a measured or specified deviation from a defined joint-effect baseline; plausibility alone is insufficient.", "slug": "synergy_and_antagonism"}], "normalized_requirement": "Dependency, compatibility, or dose interactions are plausible but have not been measured against a baseline.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Dependency, compatibility, or dose interactions are plausible but have not been measured against a baseline.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Multiple interventions, components, or variables will be used together.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when multiple interventions, components, policies, actors, incentives, or conditions will operate together and isolated evidence is not enough. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Multiple interventions, components, or variables will be used together. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Multiple interventions, components, or variables will be used together.", "Use this archetype when multiple interventions, components, policies, actors, incentives, or conditions will operate together and isolated evidence is not enough."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "Multiple interventions, components, or variables will be used together."}, {"display_text": "A team is choosing among bundles, sequences, or policy packages.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: A team is choosing among bundles, sequences, or policy packages. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A team is choosing among bundles, sequences, or policy packages."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "A team is choosing among bundles, sequences, or policy packages."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 35, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-035", "ledger_sha256": "b2d9cb6a58efe93b2206285661de58066df05438ebedb6523fd83adb353705b9"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Interface Fouling Control", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:interface_fouling_control", "slug": "interface_fouling_control"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system depends on a working interface remaining exposed, permeable, smooth, legible, or clean, while the surrounding environment continually supplies opportunistic occupants that attach or accumulate there. Even inert accumulation can degrade performance because the occupied interface no longer performs its intended role.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system depends on a working interface remaining exposed, permeable, smooth, legible, or clean, while the surrounding environment continually supplies opportunistic occupants that attach or accumulate there. Even inert accumulation can degrade performance because the occupied interface no longer performs its intended role."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A working interface that must remain clear is the first mandatory role of the exact substrate-general relation.", "role_mapping": "Surface or channel -> working interface; functional availability -> clear-to-function invariant.", "slug": "biofouling", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b035_a15_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The system has a surface, aperture, channel, lens, membrane, connector, seal, display, pathway, or other contact zone that must remain functionally available. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The system has a surface, aperture, channel, lens, membrane, connector, seal, display, pathway, or other contact zone that must remain functionally available."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Biofouling", "one_liner": "Opportunistic matter accumulates at a working interface, charging a cost for occupation, not activity.", "page_ref": "prime:biofouling", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Surface or channel -> working interface; functional availability -> clear-to-function invariant.", "slug": "biofouling", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A working interface that must remain clear is the first mandatory role of the exact substrate-general relation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A working surface, aperture, channel, lens, membrane, connector, pathway, or contact zone must remain clear to function.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact relation explicitly generalizes from organisms to inert or well-formed opportunistic occupants supplied by the environment.", "role_mapping": "Environment -> depositing source; organisms or debris -> opportunistic occupants; attachment -> deposition.", "slug": "biofouling", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b035_a15_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The environment contains organisms, particles, residues, debris, obsolete additions, or other occupants that can attach without being deliberately introduced as work inputs. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The environment contains organisms, particles, residues, debris, obsolete additions, or other occupants that can attach without being deliberately introduced as work inputs."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Biofouling", "one_liner": "Opportunistic matter accumulates at a working interface, charging a cost for occupation, not activity.", "page_ref": "prime:biofouling", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Environment -> depositing source; organisms or debris -> opportunistic occupants; attachment -> deposition.", "slug": "biofouling", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact relation explicitly generalizes from organisms to inert or well-formed opportunistic occupants supplied by the environment."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A depositing environment supplies opportunistic organisms, particles, residues, debris, or obsolete occupants that attach without being work inputs.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Threshold-nonlinear degradation after initially tolerable accumulation is mandatory in the exact record.", "role_mapping": "Small tolerable amount -> subthreshold occupation; rising blockage or drag -> nonlinear degradation.", "slug": "biofouling", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b035_a15_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Small amounts of occupation are tolerable, but cost rises as coverage, roughness, opacity, blockage, or drag accumulates. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Small amounts of occupation are tolerable, but cost rises as coverage, roughness, opacity, blockage, or drag accumulates."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Biofouling", "one_liner": "Opportunistic matter accumulates at a working interface, charging a cost for occupation, not activity.", "page_ref": "prime:biofouling", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Small tolerable amount -> subthreshold occupation; rising blockage or drag -> nonlinear degradation.", "slug": "biofouling", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Threshold-nonlinear degradation after initially tolerable accumulation is mandatory in the exact record."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Small occupation is tolerated, but interface cost rises sharply with coverage, roughness, opacity, blockage, or drag.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Accumulation grows whenever deposition exceeds removal; deposition net of removal is the governing rate.", "role_mapping": "Attachment rate -> deposition; shedding -> removal; accumulation -> positive net rate.", "slug": "biofouling", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b035_a15_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Natural shedding or ordinary use does not clear the interface as fast as deposition and attachment occur. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Natural shedding or ordinary use does not clear the interface as fast as deposition and attachment occur."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Biofouling", "one_liner": "Opportunistic matter accumulates at a working interface, charging a cost for occupation, not activity.", "page_ref": "prime:biofouling", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Attachment rate -> deposition; shedding -> removal; accumulation -> positive net rate.", "slug": "biofouling", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Accumulation grows whenever deposition exceeds removal; deposition net of removal is the governing rate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Passive shedding or ordinary use removes occupants more slowly than deposition adds them.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The cost of waiting for visible failure is higher than the cost of active prevention, inspection, cleaning, or replacement.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: The cost of waiting for visible failure is higher than the cost of active prevention, inspection, cleaning, or replacement. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The cost of waiting for visible failure is higher than the cost of active prevention, inspection, cleaning, or replacement."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The cost of waiting for visible failure is higher than the cost of active prevention, inspection, cleaning, or replacement."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 35, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-035", "ledger_sha256": "b2d9cb6a58efe93b2206285661de58066df05438ebedb6523fd83adb353705b9"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Interleaved Discrimination Practice", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:interleaved_discrimination_practice", "slug": "interleaved_discrimination_practice"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 3 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Practice is organized in homogeneous blocks that make performance look strong while hiding weak discrimination, brittle retrieval, and poor transfer. Learners or performers improve within a local run because the surrounding context tells them what kind of action is expected. When items are later mixed, delayed, or embedded in realistic conditions, they choose the wrong method, confuse near categories, fail to retrieve, or cannot adapt the skill outside the block.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Practice is organized in homogeneous blocks that make performance look strong while hiding weak discrimination, brittle retrieval, and poor transfer. Learners or performers improve within a local run because the surrounding context tells them what kind of action is expected. When items are later mixed, delayed, or embedded in realistic conditions, they choose the wrong method, confuse near categories, fail to retrieve, or cannot adapt the skill outside the block."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The atom supplies a graded training outcome, an incidental block cue, optimization toward that cheap correlate, and collapse when the cue-target relation changes under mixing.", "role_mapping": "Blocked success -> training-distribution outcome; topic cue -> cheap correlate; mixed failure -> correlation break and localized collapse.", "slug": "shortcut_learning", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b036_a01_c13", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Learners perform well when one topic or procedure is announced but struggle when similar targets are mixed. Multiple targets are similar enough that blocked practice lets shallow cues or repetition effects substitute for discrimination. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1, 3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Learners perform well when one topic or procedure is announced but struggle when similar targets are mixed.", "Multiple targets are similar enough that blocked practice lets shallow cues or repetition effects substitute for discrimination."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Shortcut Learning", "one_liner": "An adapting system replaces the structure it was meant to learn with a cheaper incidental feature that correlates with success on its training distribution, and collapses sharply once that correlation breaks.", "page_ref": "prime:shortcut_learning", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Blocked success -> training-distribution outcome; topic cue -> cheap correlate; mixed failure -> correlation break and localized collapse.", "slug": "shortcut_learning", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The atom supplies a graded training outcome, an incidental block cue, optimization toward that cheap correlate, and collapse when the cue-target relation changes under mixing."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Blocked practice rewards cheap topic or repetition cues that succeed within blocks but fail when similar targets are mixed.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1, 3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P068-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O9"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must concern application in realistic use rather than only guided practice.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Selection occurs in the real use environment.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the absence of an external category or action label.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "No label supplies the required selection.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require active correct discrimination rather than passive recognition.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The user must select the correct alternative.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must require selecting the correct category.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The selection target can be a category.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must require selecting the correct method.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The selection target can be a method.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must require selecting the correct diagnosis.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The selection target can be a diagnosis.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must require selecting the correct movement.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The selection target can be a movement.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must require selecting the correct interpretation.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The selection target can be an interpretation.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must require selecting the correct response.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "The selection target can be a response.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Real use requires selecting the correct action or classification without a supplied label.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Unlabeled real use requires correct discrimination among alternatives.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P068-C04-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Classification does not require an unlabeled real-use environment or a training-to-use discrimination gap.", "slug": "classification"}], "residual_id": "r:interleaved_discrimination_practice:b036_a01_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b036_a01_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The real environment requires selecting the right category, method, diagnosis, movement, interpretation, or response without a label. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The real environment requires selecting the right category, method, diagnosis, movement, interpretation, or response without a label."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Classification does not require an unlabeled real-use environment or a training-to-use discrimination gap.", "slug": "classification"}], "normalized_requirement": "Real use requires selecting the correct category, method, diagnosis, movement, interpretation, or response without a supplied label.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Real use requires selecting the correct category, method, diagnosis, movement, interpretation, or response without a supplied label.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P068-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require excessive reliance on homogeneous blocks rather than occasional blocked practice.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A practice routine overuses homogeneous blocks.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the practice-to-use distribution mismatch.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The blocked practice conditions do not resemble later use conditions.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must apply the mismatch to topic blocks.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The overused blocks can be topic blocks.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must apply the mismatch to chapter-based practice.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The overused blocks can be chapters.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must apply the mismatch to repeated song blocks.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The overused blocks can be songs.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must apply the mismatch to homogeneous drills.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The overused blocks can be drills.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must apply the mismatch to repeated job-type blocks.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The overused blocks can be job types.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Practice overuses homogeneous blocks that do not resemble later use conditions.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Overblocked practice mismatches later use conditions.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P068-C05-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Interleaving alternates related targets; over-blocked practice is the inverse sequencing state.", "slug": "interleaving"}], "residual_id": "r:interleaved_discrimination_practice:b036_a01_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b036_a01_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A curriculum or practice routine overuses topic blocks, chapters, songs, drills, or job types that do not resemble later use conditions. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A curriculum or practice routine overuses topic blocks, chapters, songs, drills, or job types that do not resemble later use conditions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Interleaving alternates related targets; over-blocked practice is the inverse sequencing state.", "slug": "interleaving"}], "normalized_requirement": "Practice overuses homogeneous blocks that do not resemble later use conditions.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Practice overuses homogeneous blocks that do not resemble later use conditions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Retention after a delay matters more than immediate speed at the end of a single practice block.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Practice is organized in homogeneous blocks that make performance look strong while hiding weak discrimination, brittle retrieval, and poor transfer. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Retention after a delay matters more than immediate speed at the end of a single practice block. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Retention after a delay matters more than immediate speed at the end of a single practice block.", "Practice is organized in homogeneous blocks that make performance look strong while hiding weak discrimination, brittle retrieval, and poor transfer."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Retention after a delay matters more than immediate speed at the end of a single practice block."}, {"display_text": "A training system, teacher, coach, or tutor has enough item variety to sequence related targets deliberately.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: A training system, teacher, coach, or tutor has enough item variety to sequence related targets deliberately. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A training system, teacher, coach, or tutor has enough item variety to sequence related targets deliberately."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "A training system, teacher, coach, or tutor has enough item variety to sequence related targets deliberately."}, {"display_text": "Computerized practice, flashcard, simulation, or scheduling systems need to mix items while controlling load, coverage, and feedback.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this deployment constraint: Computerized practice, flashcard, simulation, or scheduling systems need to mix items while controlling load, coverage, and feedback. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Computerized practice, flashcard, simulation, or scheduling systems need to mix items while controlling load, coverage, and feedback."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "Computerized practice, flashcard, simulation, or scheduling systems need to mix items while controlling load, coverage, and feedback."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 36, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-036", "ledger_sha256": "20ce48df4dd5970258608c63f432fecfd24d9d9b43f656a8ce22f00bbae0eb3f"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Intermediate-State Throughput Control", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:intermediate_state_throughput_control", "slug": "intermediate_state_throughput_control"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A multi-step transformation is governed only by endpoint inputs and outputs while an absent-at-endpoints transient state silently controls throughput, yield, quality, risk, or path selection.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A multi-step transformation is governed only by endpoint inputs and outputs while an absent-at-endpoints transient state silently controls throughput, yield, quality, risk, or path selection."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact relation has bracketing endpoints and a distinct named interior state with its own population trajectory.", "role_mapping": "Input and output -> bracketing endpoints; recognizable intermediate -> transient interior state.", "slug": "reaction_intermediate", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b036_a02_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The transformation passes through a recognizable intermediate state, stock, queue, compound, case status, work-in-process state, staging table, or readiness condition. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The transformation passes through a recognizable intermediate state, stock, queue, compound, case status, work-in-process state, staging table, or readiness condition."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Reaction Intermediate", "one_liner": "A multi-step transformation passes through a named transient state, absent at both endpoints, whose formation and consumption rates govern throughput and form a distinct intervention surface.", "page_ref": "prime:reaction_intermediate", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Input and output -> bracketing endpoints; recognizable intermediate -> transient interior state.", "slug": "reaction_intermediate", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact relation has bracketing endpoints and a distinct named interior state with its own population trajectory."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A transformation passes through a named, measurable intermediate state between input and final output.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Absence at both endpoints and a distinct interior identity separate an intermediate from a buffer or pipeline stage.", "role_mapping": "Neither endpoint -> absent at input/output; distinct status -> interior identity.", "slug": "reaction_intermediate", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b036_a02_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The intermediate is neither the initial input nor the final desired output, so it is easy to under-instrument or treat as incidental. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The intermediate is neither the initial input nor the final desired output, so it is easy to under-instrument or treat as incidental."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Reaction Intermediate", "one_liner": "A multi-step transformation passes through a named transient state, absent at both endpoints, whose formation and consumption rates govern throughput and form a distinct intervention surface.", "page_ref": "prime:reaction_intermediate", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Neither endpoint -> absent at input/output; distinct status -> interior identity.", "slug": "reaction_intermediate", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Absence at both endpoints and a distinct interior identity separate an intermediate from a buffer or pipeline stage."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The intermediate is structurally distinct from both the initial input and the final output.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P068-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must identify an in-process intermediate with incoming formation and outgoing consumption.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An intermediate state has distinct formation and consumption rates.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require rate imbalance large enough to affect the process, not harmless measurement noise.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The formation and consumption rates diverge materially.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must link the formation-consumption imbalance to the stated consequence.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The rate divergence causes an adverse process consequence.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail accumulation caused by the rate divergence.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The consequence can be intermediate accumulation.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail starvation caused by the rate divergence.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The consequence can be intermediate starvation.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail quality decay caused by the rate divergence.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The consequence can be quality decay.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail side reactions caused by the rate divergence.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The consequence can be side reactions.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail downstream idling caused by the rate divergence.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The consequence can be idle downstream capacity.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Intermediate formation and consumption rates diverge enough to cause an adverse throughput consequence.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Intermediate formation-consumption imbalance degrades throughput.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P068-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact prime has independent formation and consumption rates but permits a balanced steady-state population without these failures.", "slug": "reaction_intermediate"}], "residual_id": "r:intermediate_state_throughput_control:b036_a02_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b036_a02_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Formation and consumption rates can diverge, causing accumulation, starvation, quality decay, side reactions, or idle downstream capacity. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Formation and consumption rates can diverge, causing accumulation, starvation, quality decay, side reactions, or idle downstream capacity."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact prime has independent formation and consumption rates but permits a balanced steady-state population without these failures.", "slug": "reaction_intermediate"}], "normalized_requirement": "Formation and consumption rates diverge enough to cause accumulation, starvation, decay, side reactions, or downstream idling.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Formation and consumption rates diverge enough to cause accumulation, starvation, decay, side reactions, or downstream idling.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P068-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O9"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must identify an in-process state between formation and final output.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A process contains an intermediate state.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require a bounded useful window rather than indefinite stability.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The intermediate's useful residence duration is finite.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the ordering from useful intermediate to post-window degradation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The adverse change occurs after the useful residence window.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail spoilage after the residence window.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The post-window change can be spoilage.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail loss through aging after the residence window.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The post-window change can be aging out.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail staleness after the residence window.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The post-window change can be staleness.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail contextual loss after the residence window.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The post-window change can be loss of context.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail safety risk after the residence window.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The post-window change can be creation of risk.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail invalid or altered path selection after the residence window.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "The post-window change can be a path change.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "An intermediate has a finite useful residence window before a quality, context, safety, or path failure occurs.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An intermediate state loses usefulness after a finite residence window.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P068-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A critical period is a developmental receptivity window, not the shelf life of an in-process state.", "slug": "critical_period"}], "residual_id": "r:intermediate_state_throughput_control:b036_a02_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b036_a02_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The intermediate has a finite useful residence window before it spoils, ages, becomes stale, loses context, creates risk, or changes path. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The intermediate has a finite useful residence window before it spoils, ages, becomes stale, loses context, creates risk, or changes path."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A permanent warehouse stock could remain useful indefinitely, but the exact record excludes warehouse-like residence and requires readiness decay after the bound.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Staging Area", "one_liner": "Hold prepared resources in a ready-to-deploy state in a zone adjacent to the point of need but outside the active flow, so preparation cadence and consumption cadence can each run at their own rate across one buffer.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:staging_area", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "staging_area"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "staging_area", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P068-C07-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact staging-area record requires a prepared intermediate, a bounded useful residence, and post-bound staleness, satisfying the staleness branch directly."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The intermediate has a finite useful residence window before losing quality, context, safety, or path validity.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P068-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must distinguish an in-process intermediate from the final output.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A process has a final output and an intermediate state.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve diagnostic capability of the intermediate signal without requiring it to have been observed.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A signal in the intermediate state can diagnose the eventual failure.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the direction in which intermediate evidence leads endpoint failure visibility.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The intermediate signal is available before the final-output problem becomes visible.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must link the early signal to the later failure rather than two unrelated events.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The intermediate signal and final-output problem concern the same failure.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Final-output failure becomes visible later than a diagnostic signal available in the intermediate state.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Intermediate-state signals lead final-output failure visibility.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P068-C08-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Latency does not require a measurable intermediate or an earlier diagnostic signal.", "slug": "latency"}], "residual_id": "r:intermediate_state_throughput_control:b036_a02_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b036_a02_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Final output problems appear late, while intermediate state signals would reveal the failure earlier. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Final output problems appear late, while intermediate state signals would reveal the failure earlier."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Latency does not require a measurable intermediate or an earlier diagnostic signal.", "slug": "latency"}], "normalized_requirement": "Final-output failures become visible later than diagnostic signals in the intermediate state.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Final-output failures become visible later than diagnostic signals in the intermediate state.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Operators have levers that can change formation, conversion, holding conditions, routing, clearance, or priority at the intermediate state.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The intermediate is temporary, so it is tempting to ignore; but because every successful transformation must pass through it, the temporary state can become the most durable control surface. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: Operators have levers that can change formation, conversion, holding conditions, routing, clearance, or priority at the intermediate state. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Operators have levers that can change formation, conversion, holding conditions, routing, clearance, or priority at the intermediate state.", "The intermediate is temporary, so it is tempting to ignore; but because every successful transformation must pass through it, the temporary state can become the most durable control surface."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Operators have levers that can change formation, conversion, holding conditions, routing, clearance, or priority at the intermediate state."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 36, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-036", "ledger_sha256": "20ce48df4dd5970258608c63f432fecfd24d9d9b43f656a8ce22f00bbae0eb3f"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Intermittent Burst Absorption", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:intermittent_burst_absorption", "slug": "intermittent_burst_absorption"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a mismatch between steady-state efficiency and burst-state resilience. A system sized for ordinary flow can be efficient during quiet periods, but the same lean design becomes fragile when arrivals accelerate or disturbances spike. Because the bursts are intermittent, the organization or infrastructure may resist permanent overcapacity; because the bursts are consequential, ordinary capacity is not enough.\n\nThe problem often has four layers. First, the burst is not recognized early enough. Second, excess load has nowhere safe to wait or route. Third, priority decisions are made implicitly by arrival order, noise, influence, or whoever shouts loudest. Fourth, the visible spike passes but leaves recovery debt: backlog, fatigue, depleted reserves, unresolved exceptions, or degraded infrastructure.\n\nIntermittent Burst Absorption addresses all four layers. It turns burst handling from improvisation into a reusable structural response.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system is generally stable under ordinary load but periodically receives irregular bursts that exceed steady-state capacity, creating overload, lost signals, failed service, unsafe improvisation, hidden backlog, or cascading disruption."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Sparse high-amplitude bursts amid long quiescent intervals are the exact signal structure.", "role_mapping": "Intermittent bursts -> sparse extremes; non-burst periods -> quiescent background.", "slug": "intermittency", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b036_a03_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Bursts are intermittent rather than continuous. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Bursts are intermittent rather than continuous."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Intermittency", "one_liner": "Irregular bursts.", "page_ref": "prime:intermittency", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Intermittent bursts -> sparse extremes; non-burst periods -> quiescent background.", "slug": "intermittency", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Sparse high-amplitude bursts amid long quiescent intervals are the exact signal structure."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Activity consists of sparse high-amplitude bursts separated by quiescent periods.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P068-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must identify burst demand rather than merely elevated continuous load.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A system receives an intermittent burst of demand.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must identify the normal processing baseline against which the burst is compared.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The system has an ordinary steady-state handling capacity.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the overload direction rather than variability below capacity.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Burst demand exceeds the ordinary handling capacity.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Intermittent burst demand exceeds ordinary steady-state handling capacity.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Burst demand exceeds steady-state handling capacity.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P068-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Buffering can smooth sub-capacity variability and does not require overload above ordinary handling.", "slug": "buffering"}], "residual_id": "r:intermittent_burst_absorption:b036_a03_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b036_a03_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The burst exceeds ordinary steady-state handling. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The burst exceeds ordinary steady-state handling."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A large helper pool arriving below intake throughput would falsify overload, but it is expressly outside the DSA regime.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Volunteer-Management Overload", "one_liner": "The crisis failure mode in which would-be helpers arrive faster than a response system's finite credential-brief-assign-supervise intake channel can absorb them, so beyond a threshold each marginal arrival consumes net capacity rather than adding it.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:volunteer_management_overload", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "volunteer_management_overload"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "volunteer_management_overload", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P068-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every instance requires crisis arrivals to outpace the ordinary finite intake channel, directly satisfying the burst-capacity head."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A coordinated inflow below command absorption capacity would falsify the head but is not convergence failure under the exact record.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Convergence Failure", "one_liner": "The disaster-management pathology in which uncoordinated pro-social inflows — volunteers, donations, inquiries — arrive faster than incident command can absorb, consuming the same coordination bandwidth the primary hazard needs and triggering a second disaster.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:convergence_failure", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "convergence_failure"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "convergence_failure", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P068-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "The DSA directly defines pro-social inflows arriving faster than incident command can absorb, which is burst demand exceeding steady handling capacity."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Burst demand exceeds ordinary steady-state handling capacity.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Intermittency supplies sparse bursts but does not guarantee that any burst fits available temporary capacity.", "slug": "intermittency"}], "residual_id": "r:intermittent_burst_absorption:b036_a03_c3", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b036_a03_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The burst is short enough or bounded enough to absorb. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The burst is short enough or bounded enough to absorb."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Intermittency supplies sparse bursts but does not guarantee that any burst fits available temporary capacity.", "slug": "intermittency"}], "normalized_requirement": "The burst is bounded enough in duration or volume for temporary absorption.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The burst is bounded enough in duration or volume for temporary absorption.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P068-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must identify burst arrivals requiring service from the same handling system.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Multiple arrivals compete for service during a burst.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require a binding capacity constraint during the burst.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Available handling capacity is insufficient to serve all burst arrivals equivalently.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail necessity of priority allocation rather than merely its usefulness.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Some prioritization among the arrivals is unavoidable.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must link constrained capacity to unavoidable prioritization in the stated direction.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The capacity constraint makes the prioritization necessary.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Limited capacity to handle a burst makes prioritization among arrivals unavoidable.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Burst-capacity constraint necessitates priority allocation.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P068-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An intermittent signal need not compete for constrained service or force prioritization.", "slug": "intermittency"}], "residual_id": "r:intermittent_burst_absorption:b036_a03_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b036_a03_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Some prioritization is unavoidable. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Some prioritization is unavoidable."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An intermittent signal need not compete for constrained service or force prioritization.", "slug": "intermittency"}], "normalized_requirement": "Limited handling capacity makes prioritization among burst arrivals unavoidable.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Limited handling capacity makes prioritization among burst arrivals unavoidable.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P068-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must place the residual burden after a bounded burst-response episode.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A system has completed temporary handling of a burst.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must make burst handling produce the residual burden rather than merely precede it.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Handling the burst leaves an operational burden.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require a materially important post-burst burden.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The residual burden is consequential rather than negligible.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail consequential recovery work after the burst.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The burden can be recovery debt.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail a consequential backlog after the burst.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The burden can be backlog debt.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail consequential fatigue after the burst.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The burden can be fatigue debt.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail consequential deferred maintenance after the burst.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The burden can be maintenance debt.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Temporary burst handling leaves a consequential post-burst operational burden.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Absorbed bursts leave consequential operational debt.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P068-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Technical debt is accumulated future rework from expedient design choices, not all post-burst recovery burdens.", "slug": "technical_debt"}], "residual_id": "r:intermittent_burst_absorption:b036_a03_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b036_a03_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Post-burst debt matters. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Post-burst debt matters."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Technical debt is accumulated future rework from expedient design choices, not all post-burst recovery burdens.", "slug": "technical_debt"}], "normalized_requirement": "Temporary burst handling leaves consequential recovery, backlog, fatigue, or maintenance debt.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Temporary burst handling leaves consequential recovery, backlog, fatigue, or maintenance debt.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Normal operation must continue during the burst.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The system wants efficient steady-state operation, but intermittent bursts require temporary excess capacity, looser coupling, triage, and recovery that would be inefficient or unnecessary if maintained permanently. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: Normal operation must continue during the burst. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Normal operation must continue during the burst.", "The system wants efficient steady-state operation, but intermittent bursts require temporary excess capacity, looser coupling, triage, and recovery that would be inefficient or unnecessary if maintained permanently."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Normal operation must continue during the burst."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 36, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-036", "ledger_sha256": "20ce48df4dd5970258608c63f432fecfd24d9d9b43f656a8ce22f00bbae0eb3f"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Intermittent Failure Capture", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:intermittent_failure_capture", "slug": "intermittent_failure_capture"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 2, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is an evidence timing mismatch. Diagnosis needs information from the failure state, but the failure state is intermittent and self-erasing. Logs rotate, systems reset, symptoms fade, witnesses forget, cleanup routines remove evidence, and people reinterpret episodes after the fact.\n\nThis creates recurring root-cause ambiguity. Each episode is treated as isolated or anecdotal because the common sequence across episodes is unavailable. The system may accumulate reports without accumulating diagnosis.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A failure, symptom, anomaly, or breakdown appears irregularly and cannot be reliably reproduced or inspected during ordinary investigation, so the system repeatedly returns to normal before enough evidence is captured to explain what happened."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The identifier condition maps to the exact sparse-burst versus quiescent-background structure.", "role_mapping": "Intermittent failure -> rare burst; ordinary operation -> quiescent interval.", "slug": "intermittency", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b036_a04_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Failure is intermittent. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["failure_is_intermittent"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Intermittency", "one_liner": "Irregular bursts.", "page_ref": "prime:intermittency", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Intermittent failure -> rare burst; ordinary operation -> quiescent interval.", "slug": "intermittency", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The identifier condition maps to the exact sparse-burst versus quiescent-background structure."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Failure appears in sparse, irregular, high-deviation episodes separated by ordinary behavior.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P068-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must concern a failure with bounded irregular episodes rather than a continuously present fault.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A failure occurs in intermittent episodes.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must identify routine inspection rather than continuous event-triggered capture.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The system is examined through ordinary inspection.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve low overlap probability rather than require that every inspection misses.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Inspection is unlikely to coincide with the failure episode.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve temporal coincidence as the relevant capture condition.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The inspection and failure must overlap for the episode to be observed directly.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "Ordinary inspection is unlikely to overlap an intermittent failure episode.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Routine inspection rarely coincides with an intermittent failure.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P068-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Monitoring can be continuous or correctly timed and need not miss an episode.", "slug": "monitoring"}], "residual_id": "r:intermittent_failure_capture:b036_a04_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b036_a04_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Ordinary inspection misses the episode. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["ordinary_inspection_misses_the_episode"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A defect that reproduces stably under the debugger would falsify the unit, but the exact record classifies that as a bohrbug rather than a heisenbug.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Heisenbug", "one_liner": "Name the software defect whose failure vanishes under observation because attaching a debugger, adding a print, or disabling optimization perturbs the timing window or interleaving it rides on — so disappearance-under-observation is the diagnostic tell, not evidence the bug is gone.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:heisenbug", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "heisenbug"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "heisenbug", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P068-C12-U1", "why_it_fits": "The defining behavior is an intermittent failure that vanishes under ordinary inspection, so inspection cannot coincide with the episode it must overlap to observe."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A stable breakpoint-reachable defect would make inspection likely to coincide, but it is not a mandelbug under the exact record.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Mandelbug", "one_liner": "Reclassify a chaotic, irreproducible software defect as deterministic-but-undersampled — triggered by a rare joint configuration of hidden state — so effort shifts from finding the right breakpoint to sampling that joint state until the configuration is caught.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:mandelbug", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "mandelbug"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "mandelbug", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P068-C12-U1", "why_it_fits": "The DSA directly requires a rare episode whose joint state ordinary narrow-window inspection is unlikely to sample at the required moment."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Ordinary inspection is unlikely to coincide with the failure episode.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P068-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must concern diagnosis of a bounded intermittent episode rather than a stable fault.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An intermittent failure episode is being diagnosed.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require the local order of events as diagnostic evidence.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The episode's local sequence is necessary for diagnosis.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require the contemporaneous system state as diagnostic evidence.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The episode's local state is necessary for diagnosis.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require the contemporaneous environment as diagnostic evidence.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The episode's local environment is necessary for diagnosis.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "An intermittent episode's local sequence, state, and environment are necessary for diagnosing the failure.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Intermittent failure diagnosis requires episode-local context.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P068-C13-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Replay can reproduce a context but does not entail that context is necessary for diagnosis.", "slug": "replay"}], "residual_id": "r:intermittent_failure_capture:b036_a04_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b036_a04_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Episode context matters. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["episode_context_matters"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Replay can reproduce a context but does not entail that context is necessary for diagnosis.", "slug": "replay"}], "normalized_requirement": "The episode's local sequence, state, and environment are necessary for diagnosis.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The episode's local sequence, state, and environment are necessary for diagnosis.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P068-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"], ["O1", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must link the evidence to the transient failure episode it can diagnose.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An intermittent failure episode produces diagnostic evidence.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail disappearance of the episode evidence.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The diagnostic evidence can disappear.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail rapid degradation of the episode evidence.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The diagnostic evidence can degrade rapidly.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "Diagnostic evidence produced by an intermittent failure episode is ephemeral.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Intermittent-failure evidence disappears or degrades rapidly.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P068-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Evidence fidelity can decay gradually through copying or transformation without a brief failure episode.", "slug": "evidence_fidelity_decay"}], "residual_id": "r:intermittent_failure_capture:b036_a04_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b036_a04_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Evidence is ephemeral. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["evidence_is_ephemeral"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A failure whose evidence remains stably observable would falsify the branch, but it is excluded from the heisenbug class.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Heisenbug", "one_liner": "Name the software defect whose failure vanishes under observation because attaching a debugger, adding a print, or disabling optimization perturbs the timing window or interleaving it rides on — so disappearance-under-observation is the diagnostic tell, not evidence the bug is gone.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:heisenbug", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "heisenbug"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "heisenbug", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P068-C14-U1", "why_it_fits": "Disappearance under observation is the DSA diagnostic tell, directly satisfying the disappearance branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "An ordinary continuous ethnographic encounter preserves fieldnote backfill but is not intermittent-failure evidence. The domain guard excludes exactly that counterexample.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Fieldnote Backfill", "one_liner": "The validity threat by which a delayed field write-up silently fuses direct observation, inference, and gap-filling reconstruction into one undifferentiated register, collapsing the attribution that tells the strongest evidence from the weakest.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:fieldnote_backfill", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "field_encounter_is_intermittent_failure", "predicate": "The field encounter being recorded is an intermittent failure episode.", "rationale": "Publication safety passes: every complete candidate instance satisfying the one atomic candidate-anchored qualifier necessarily satisfies a full DNF branch, and the qualifier adds no role or unrelated relation."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "fieldnote_backfill"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "field_encounter_is_intermittent_failure"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "fieldnote_backfill", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P068-C14-U1", "why_it_fits": "Fieldnote backfill directly supplies rapidly degrading episode evidence; one domain restriction identifies the already-defined encounter as an intermittent failure episode."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Diagnostic evidence from the episode disappears or degrades rapidly.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Capture is possible without unacceptable harm.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source states: Capture is possible without unacceptable harm. The normalized feasibility condition is: Capture is possible without unacceptable harm. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["capture_is_possible_without_unacceptable_harm"]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "capture_is_possible_without_unacceptable_harm"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 36, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-036", "ledger_sha256": "20ce48df4dd5970258608c63f432fecfd24d9d9b43f656a8ce22f00bbae0eb3f"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Intermittent Sampling", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:intermittent_sampling", "slug": "intermittent_sampling"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a mismatch between **episode duration** and **observation availability**. The event exists, but not long enough or predictably enough for the normal observation rhythm to catch it. Reports accumulate without proof, failures vanish before inspection, and the system confuses “not seen” with “not real.”\n\nThis pattern often appears when bursts, rare events, compliance lapses, symptoms, or defects are real but irregular. The organization may overreact by monitoring everything continuously, or underreact by dismissing reports because scheduled reviews show normal conditions. Intermittent Sampling creates a middle path: bounded observation designed around the intermittent nature of the target.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "The relevant event or state appears in bursts or intermittent episodes, making ordinary observation miss it."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Irregular sparse bursts and long quiescent periods are mandatory in the exact record.", "role_mapping": "Brief irregular target -> high-amplitude burst; between appearances -> quiescent interval.", "slug": "intermittency", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b036_a05_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The target state appears briefly, irregularly, or in bursts. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The target state appears briefly, irregularly, or in bursts."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Intermittency", "one_liner": "Irregular bursts.", "page_ref": "prime:intermittency", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Brief irregular target -> high-amplitude burst; between appearances -> quiescent interval.", "slug": "intermittency", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Irregular sparse bursts and long quiescent periods are mandatory in the exact record."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The target state appears in sparse, irregular bursts separated by near-baseline periods.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Monitoring can be affordable, available, and nonintrusive.", "slug": "monitoring"}], "residual_id": "r:intermittent_sampling:b036_a05_c2", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b036_a05_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when the system repeatedly says, “The problem happens, but never when we are looking.” It fits situations where continuous monitoring is too expensive, intrusive, noisy, or technically impossible, yet waiting for normal review misses the condition. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Continuous monitoring is too costly, noisy, intrusive, risky, or unavailable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Continuous monitoring is too costly, noisy, intrusive, risky, or unavailable.", "Use this archetype when the system repeatedly says, “The problem happens, but never when we are looking.” It fits situations where continuous monitoring is too expensive, intrusive, noisy, or technically impossible, yet waiting for normal review misses the condition."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Monitoring can be affordable, available, and nonintrusive.", "slug": "monitoring"}], "normalized_requirement": "Continuous monitoring is too costly, noisy, intrusive, risky, or unavailable.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Continuous monitoring is too costly, noisy, intrusive, risky, or unavailable.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P068-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must link the evidence to a target that appears in intermittent episodes.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Evidence concerns an intermittent target state.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the evidence-quality limitation, not merely a small but systematic sample.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The available evidence is anecdotal rather than systematically captured.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}], "predicate": "Existing evidence of an intermittent target state is anecdotal.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Evidence of an intermittent state lacks systematic support.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P068-C15-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P068-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must link the evidence to a target that appears in intermittent episodes.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Evidence concerns an intermittent target state.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve harmful evidence latency rather than mere chronological delay without consequence.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The evidence becomes available too late for the relevant use.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "Existing evidence of an intermittent target state arrives too late.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Evidence of an intermittent state is delayed beyond useful timing.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P068-C15-U2"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Evidence can decay without being anecdotal, and delayed evidence need not concern an intermittent target.", "slug": "evidence_fidelity_decay"}], "residual_id": "r:intermittent_sampling:b036_a05_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b036_a05_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Existing evidence is anecdotal or delayed. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Existing evidence is anecdotal or delayed."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 2, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 2}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Evidence can decay without being anecdotal, and delayed evidence need not concern an intermittent target.", "slug": "evidence_fidelity_decay"}], "normalized_requirement": "Existing evidence of the target state is anecdotal or arrives too late.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 2 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Existing evidence of the target state is anecdotal or arrives too late.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P069-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must concern a measured target that appears in intermittent episodes.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A target event occurs intermittently and is being measured.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require predictable observation without assigning an unstated role for whom it is predictable.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The occurrence or timing of observation is predictable.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the possibility of observer-induced alteration without requiring that alteration has occurred.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The predictable observation may alter the target event.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve observation-to-event causal direction rather than event-to-observation selection.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Any alteration would be caused by the predictable observation.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Predictable observation may alter the intermittent event being measured.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Predictable observation can perturb an intermittent target event.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P069-C01-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Intermittency does not require an observer-sensitive mechanism.", "slug": "intermittency"}], "residual_id": "r:intermittent_sampling:b036_a05_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b036_a05_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The event may be influenced by predictable observation. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The event may be influenced by predictable observation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_GUARDED_EQUIVALENT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "An unscheduled debugger attachment preserves the DSA but not O2; the guard excludes it, while all guarded instances retain the observation-induced perturbation.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Heisenbug", "one_liner": "Name the software defect whose failure vanishes under observation because attaching a debugger, adding a print, or disabling optimization perturbs the timing window or interleaving it rides on — so disappearance-under-observation is the diagnostic tell, not evidence the bug is gone.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:heisenbug", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2"], "guard_type": "TIMING_BINDING", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "debug_observation_is_predictably_scheduled", "predicate": "The debugging observation occurs on a predictable investigation schedule.", "rationale": "SSD passes after the qualifier: An unscheduled debugger attachment preserves the DSA but not O2; the guard excludes it, while all guarded instances retain the observation-induced perturbation. The guard applies one timing binding to the existing debugging observation role, is anchored in the candidate record, fills only O2, and neither restates the structural head nor introduces a principal role, causal relation, solution operation, or second independent fact."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "heisenbug"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The debugging observation occurs on a predictable investigation schedule."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "heisenbug", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P069-C01-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent SSD review confirms the candidate supplies the same structural spine. One timing qualifier closes the sole gap without adding a new actor or causal relation. The adopted qualifier is sufficient and non-laundering because it binds only O2 to an already-present candidate role; the recorded counterexample is excluded without changing the relation family."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Predictable observation may alter the intermittent event being measured.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A follow-up action depends on confirming the intermittent condition.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: A follow-up action depends on confirming the intermittent condition. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A follow-up action depends on confirming the intermittent condition."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "A follow-up action depends on confirming the intermittent condition."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 36, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-036", "ledger_sha256": "20ce48df4dd5970258608c63f432fecfd24d9d9b43f656a8ce22f00bbae0eb3f"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Internal Capacity Deepening", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:internal_capacity_deepening", "slug": "internal_capacity_deepening"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 5, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Demand is rising, yet decision-makers treat growth as a binary slogan—either maximize utilization inside the present system or add a new footprint—without measuring effective internal capacity, support-system ceilings, protected slack, full lifecycle cost, or the way each increment changes later options. Underused positions coexist with local overload, while outward expansion appears simple because many extension, coordination, access, infrastructure, and externality costs lie outside the immediate project ledger.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Demand is rising, yet decision-makers treat growth as a binary slogan—either maximize utilization inside the present system or add a new footprint—without measuring effective internal capacity, support-system ceilings, protected slack, full lifecycle cost, or the way each increment changes later options. Underused positions coexist with local overload, while outward expansion appears simple because many extension, coordination, access, infrastructure, and externality costs lie outside the immediate project ledger."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A defined bounded system whose boundary is a load-bearing growth variable is mandatory.", "role_mapping": "Named boundary -> bounded system; decision horizon -> boundary commitment.", "slug": "internal_intensification", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b036_a06_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A stable or deliberately chosen system boundary can be named for the decision horizon. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A stable or deliberately chosen system boundary can be named for the decision horizon."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Internal Intensification", "one_liner": "A system needing more capacity densifies, deepens, or re-uses underused positions inside its existing boundary before expanding the boundary outward, a choice between two qualitatively different cost structures that compounds over the trajectory of growth.", "page_ref": "prime:internal_intensification", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Named boundary -> bounded system; decision horizon -> boundary commitment.", "slug": "internal_intensification", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A defined bounded system whose boundary is a load-bearing growth variable is mandatory."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A stable decision-horizon boundary contains positions or capacity that form a structural whole.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact demand exceeds current but not reachable internal capacity.", "role_mapping": "Service shortfall -> capacity demand; internal potential -> reachable intensified capacity.", "slug": "internal_intensification", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b036_a06_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Demand growth or a service shortfall requires additional effective capacity rather than only better prioritization. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Demand growth or a service shortfall requires additional effective capacity rather than only better prioritization."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Internal Intensification", "one_liner": "A system needing more capacity densifies, deepens, or re-uses underused positions inside its existing boundary before expanding the boundary outward, a choice between two qualitatively different cost structures that compounds over the trajectory of growth.", "page_ref": "prime:internal_intensification", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Service shortfall -> capacity demand; internal potential -> reachable intensified capacity.", "slug": "internal_intensification", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact demand exceeds current but not reachable internal capacity."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Demand for capacity exceeds current working capacity but can potentially be met inside the boundary.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Underused internal positions are an explicit mandatory role.", "role_mapping": "Vacant or low-yield positions -> underused internal capacity.", "slug": "internal_intensification", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b036_a06_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Some internal positions are vacant, idle, fragmented, low-yield, temporally unused, reconfigurable, vertically extensible, or poorly matched to demand. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Some internal positions are vacant, idle, fragmented, low-yield, temporally unused, reconfigurable, vertically extensible, or poorly matched to demand."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Internal Intensification", "one_liner": "A system needing more capacity densifies, deepens, or re-uses underused positions inside its existing boundary before expanding the boundary outward, a choice between two qualitatively different cost structures that compounds over the trajectory of growth.", "page_ref": "prime:internal_intensification", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Vacant or low-yield positions -> underused internal capacity.", "slug": "internal_intensification", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Underused internal positions are an explicit mandatory role."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Positions inside the boundary are underused, vacant, fragmented, low-yield, temporally idle, or reconfigurable.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Expansion's boundary-crossing and distributed external costs are one side of the exact intensification-versus-expansion choice.", "role_mapping": "Outward growth -> expansion; new commitments -> expansion cost structure.", "slug": "internal_intensification", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b036_a06_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Outward expansion would create new fixed, network, infrastructure, coordination, land, or governance commitments. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Outward expansion would create new fixed, network, infrastructure, coordination, land, or governance commitments."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Internal Intensification", "one_liner": "A system needing more capacity densifies, deepens, or re-uses underused positions inside its existing boundary before expanding the boundary outward, a choice between two qualitatively different cost structures that compounds over the trajectory of growth.", "page_ref": "prime:internal_intensification", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Outward growth -> expansion; new commitments -> expansion cost structure.", "slug": "internal_intensification", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Expansion's boundary-crossing and distributed external costs are one side of the exact intensification-versus-expansion choice."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Outward expansion would add boundary-crossing infrastructure, coordination, land, network, or governance commitments.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Two qualitatively distinct cost structures, not merely different prices, are mandatory.", "role_mapping": "Internal versus external growth -> choice point; marginal and lifecycle costs -> distinct cost structures.", "slug": "internal_intensification", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b036_a06_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Internal and external growth modes have materially different marginal and lifecycle cost structures. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Internal and external growth modes have materially different marginal and lifecycle cost structures."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Internal Intensification", "one_liner": "A system needing more capacity densifies, deepens, or re-uses underused positions inside its existing boundary before expanding the boundary outward, a choice between two qualitatively different cost structures that compounds over the trajectory of growth.", "page_ref": "prime:internal_intensification", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Internal versus external growth -> choice point; marginal and lifecycle costs -> distinct cost structures.", "slug": "internal_intensification", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Two qualitatively distinct cost structures, not merely different prices, are mandatory."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Internal intensification and outward expansion have qualitatively different marginal and lifecycle costs.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The system can measure service quality, utilization, slack, support loads, and constraint migration after each increment.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Demand is rising, yet decision-makers treat growth as a binary slogan—either maximize utilization inside the present system or add a new footprint—without measuring effective internal capacity, support-system ceilings, protected slack, full lifecycle cost, or the way each increment changes later options. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: The system can measure service quality, utilization, slack, support loads, and constraint migration after each increment. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The system can measure service quality, utilization, slack, support loads, and constraint migration after each increment.", "Demand is rising, yet decision-makers treat growth as a binary slogan—either maximize utilization inside the present system or add a new footprint—without measuring effective internal capacity, support-system ceilings, protected slack, full lifecycle cost, or the way each increment changes later options."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The system can measure service quality, utilization, slack, support loads, and constraint migration after each increment."}, {"display_text": "A credible external expansion option can be maintained long enough to avoid lock-in to endless intensification.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use existing assets and connected infrastructure more fully without consuming the slack, quality, resilience, access, and future options that make the system viable; avoid premature outward expansion without turning internal intensification into a permanent ideology. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: A credible external expansion option can be maintained long enough to avoid lock-in to endless intensification. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A credible external expansion option can be maintained long enough to avoid lock-in to endless intensification.", "Use existing assets and connected infrastructure more fully without consuming the slack, quality, resilience, access, and future options that make the system viable; avoid premature outward expansion without turning internal intensification into a permanent ideology."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "A credible external expansion option can be maintained long enough to avoid lock-in to endless intensification."}, {"display_text": "Affected users, owners, workers, communities, or ecosystems can participate in defining guardrails and distributional effects.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this deployment constraint: Affected users, owners, workers, communities, or ecosystems can participate in defining guardrails and distributional effects. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Affected users, owners, workers, communities, or ecosystems can participate in defining guardrails and distributional effects."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 8, "text": "Affected users, owners, workers, communities, or ecosystems can participate in defining guardrails and distributional effects."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 36, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-036", "ledger_sha256": "20ce48df4dd5970258608c63f432fecfd24d9d9b43f656a8ce22f00bbae0eb3f"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Interoperability Standardization", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:interoperability_standardization", "slug": "interoperability_standardization"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 4, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is fragmentation at the boundary. Each participant may work internally, but the ecosystem fails when participants must exchange, coordinate, compare, plug in, hand off, or compose. The cost of each connection rises because every pair must rediscover what fields mean, what message order is expected, what statuses are valid, what errors mean, what version is supported, or who is authorized to act.\n\nThe deeper tension is between commonality and autonomy. Too little commonality creates chaos at the interaction surface. Too much commonality forces unnecessary uniformity inside local systems. Interoperability Standardization succeeds when it standardizes the minimum shared surface required for reliable interaction and leaves other design choices local.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Multiple independently built, governed, or maintained systems need to exchange information, coordinate behavior, share resources, or plug into a larger workflow, but they cannot do so reliably because they use incompatible formats, protocols, semantics, units, identifiers, permissions, timing assumptions, or boundary expectations."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P069-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must identify separately maintained system-to-system integrations rather than one common interface.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Multiple systems are connected through pairwise integrations.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail proliferation of pairwise integrations rather than a fixed small set.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The number of pairwise integrations is increasing.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must include common-interface governance as the comparison process.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Shared-interface governance develops in the same ecosystem.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the direction in which integration proliferation outpaces governance.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Pairwise integration growth is faster than shared-interface governance.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "The number of pairwise integrations grows faster than governance of shared interfaces.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Pairwise integration proliferation outpaces common-interface governance.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P069-C02-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Interoperability can use one shared standard and does not require proliferating pairwise integrations.", "slug": "interoperability"}], "residual_id": "r:interoperability_standardization:b036_a07_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b036_a07_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Pairwise integrations are multiplying. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Pairwise integrations are multiplying."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Interoperability can use one shared standard and does not require proliferating pairwise integrations.", "slug": "interoperability"}], "normalized_requirement": "The number of pairwise integrations grows faster than shared-interface governance.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The number of pairwise integrations grows faster than shared-interface governance.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P069-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must identify a function spanning at least two systems.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A function depends on more than one system.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail incompatibility rather than merely costly but successful integration.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The systems fail to compose compatibly for that function.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must make incompatibility cause actual functional blockage.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The compatibility failure blocks the cross-system function.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Compatibility failures block functions that span systems.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Cross-system function is blocked by incompatibility.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P069-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Compatibility is the positive safe-composition relation; failure to compose is its inverse.", "slug": "compatibility"}], "residual_id": "r:interoperability_standardization:b036_a07_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b036_a07_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Compatibility failures block cross-system function. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Compatibility failures block cross-system function."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A monolithic project's internal package components need not count as separate systems; the guard excludes that complete DSA instance.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Dependency Hell", "one_liner": "The pathological state where a project's transitive dependency closure holds mutually incompatible version constraints, turning installation into an NP-complete constraint-satisfaction problem that no edge-level patch can resolve.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:dependency_hell", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "dependency_components_are_separate_systems", "predicate": "The mutually constrained dependency components are separately maintained software systems.", "rationale": "SSD passes after the qualifier: A monolithic project's internal package components need not count as separate systems; the guard excludes that complete DSA instance. The guard applies one domain restriction to the existing dependency components role, is anchored in the candidate record, fills only O1, and neither restates the structural head nor introduces a principal role, causal relation, solution operation, or second independent fact."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "dependency_hell"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The mutually constrained dependency components are separately maintained software systems."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "dependency_hell", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P069-C03-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent SSD review confirms the candidate supplies the same structural spine. The guarded expression preserves the candidate's global incompatibility and installation blockage. The adopted qualifier is sufficient and non-laundering because it binds only O1 to an already-present candidate role; the recorded counterexample is excluded without changing the relation family."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A benign shared-library deployment with compatible clients is outside DLL hell; every complete DLL-hell instance includes the incompatible binding and breakage.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "DLL Hell", "one_liner": "The failure mode where programs share dynamic libraries through one global single-version-wins namespace, so an unrelated install overwrites a version another program depends on and silently breaks it — cured by breaking the single-version-wins invariant.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:dll_hell", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "dll_hell"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "dll_hell", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P069-C03-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent SSD review confirms direct entailment of one complete DNF branch. The exact record directly entails the full cross-system compatibility failure. The candidate's defining exclusions defeat the counterexample while preserving every mapped principal role and causal direction."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A small firm whose functions are not separately maintained systems can exhibit planning disagreement without satisfying O1; the guard removes that case.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "S&OP Disconnect", "one_liner": "Diagnose a firm's downstream execution crises as an upstream planning defect — separate functions each holding an internally sound but mutually incompatible plan for the same future, because no binding forum reconciles them before commitments are taken.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:s_op_disconnect", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "planning_functions_are_constituent_systems", "predicate": "The functional planning units operate as separately maintained constituent systems of the firm.", "rationale": "SSD passes after the qualifier: A small firm whose functions are not separately maintained systems can exhibit planning disagreement without satisfying O1; the guard removes that case. The guard applies one domain restriction to the existing functional planning units role, is anchored in the candidate record, fills only O1, and neither restates the structural head nor introduces a principal role, causal relation, solution operation, or second independent fact."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "s_op_disconnect"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The functional planning units operate as separately maintained constituent systems of the firm."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "s_op_disconnect", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P069-C03-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent SSD review confirms the candidate supplies the same structural spine. One candidate-anchored organizational restriction completes the compatibility skeleton. The adopted qualifier is sufficient and non-laundering because it binds only O1 to an already-present candidate role; the recorded counterexample is excluded without changing the relation family."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Aid that integrates successfully is not a complete mutual-aid-mismatch instance; mismatch necessarily preserves no incremental capability.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Mutual-aid mismatch", "one_liner": "The failure mode in which external support to an overwhelmed jurisdiction matches the gap in category but does not couple at the integration interface — wrong fittings, wrong radio plan, missing credentials, or post-peak arrival — so nominal aid yields no incremental capability.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:mutual_aid_mismatch", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "mutual_aid_mismatch"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "mutual_aid_mismatch", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P069-C03-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent SSD review confirms direct entailment of one complete DNF branch. The candidate directly instantiates cross-system incompatibility blocking function. The candidate's defining exclusions defeat the counterexample while preserving every mapped principal role and causal direction."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Compatibility failures block functions that span systems.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P069-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must involve at least two systems and actual format-level exchange.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Multiple systems exchange a shared syntactic representation.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve syntactic success rather than a failure to parse or transmit.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The exchanged syntax is successfully transferable between the systems.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail cross-system semantic divergence beneath the common format.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The systems assign inconsistent meanings to the exchanged syntax.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Systems successfully exchange syntax but interpret its meaning inconsistently.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Syntactic interoperability masks semantic inconsistency.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P069-C04-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Interoperability requires semantic agreement beyond syntax; this is its inverse failure state.", "slug": "interoperability"}], "residual_id": "r:interoperability_standardization:b036_a07_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b036_a07_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Meaning, not only format, is inconsistent. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Meaning, not only format, is inconsistent."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A purely lexical translation error is expressly excluded; a complete candidate instance preserves successful surface transfer and frame-level semantic divergence.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Intercultural Communication", "one_liner": "The field and practice of managing communicative exchange between parties operating from distinct cultural frames, diagnosing where the same surface utterance carries different presuppositions and repairing the gap below the words that translation alone cannot close.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:intercultural_communication", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "intercultural_communication"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "intercultural_communication", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P069-C04-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent SSD review confirms direct entailment of one complete DNF branch. The exact record directly entails syntactic interoperability with semantic inconsistency. The candidate's defining exclusions defeat the counterexample while preserving every mapped principal role and causal direction."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Systems exchange syntax while interpreting the exchanged meaning inconsistently.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P069-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must identify ecosystem-level activity that depends on repeated integration.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A larger ecosystem depends on integration among its systems or participants.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require repeated integration burden rather than one isolated setup cost.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Integration imposes recurring cost across the ecosystem.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must make integration burden cause actual ecosystem-level stalling.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The integration cost stalls ecosystem activity.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Repeated integration cost stalls activity in a larger ecosystem.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Integration cost stalls ecosystem activity.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P069-C05-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Systemic fragmentation can impose other coordination failures and does not require integration cost to stall an ecosystem.", "slug": "systemic_fragmentation"}], "residual_id": "r:interoperability_standardization:b036_a07_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b036_a07_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A larger ecosystem is stalled by integration cost. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A larger ecosystem is stalled by integration cost."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A god object can impose high cost without yet stalling work; the threshold guard removes that counterexample.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "God Object Anti-Pattern", "one_liner": "Diagnose a maintenance mess as concentrated rather than diffuse: one class or service accumulates outlier fan-in and fan-out to become the integration hub, collapsing modularity so all change-cost, comprehension, and new features funnel through that single node.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:god_object_anti_pattern", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O3"], "guard_type": "THRESHOLD_CROSSING", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "integration_hub_cost_is_throughput_limiting", "predicate": "The integration hub's concentrated change cost has become a throughput-limiting bottleneck for ecosystem changes.", "rationale": "SSD passes after the qualifier: A god object can impose high cost without yet stalling work; the threshold guard removes that counterexample. The guard applies one threshold crossing to the existing integration hub change cost role, is anchored in the candidate record, fills only O3, and neither restates the structural head nor introduces a principal role, causal relation, solution operation, or second independent fact."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "god_object_anti_pattern"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The integration hub's concentrated change cost has become a throughput-limiting bottleneck for ecosystem changes."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "god_object_anti_pattern", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P069-C05-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent SSD review confirms the candidate supplies the same structural spine. One candidate-anchored threshold makes the recurring integration cost stall ecosystem activity. The adopted qualifier is sufficient and non-laundering because it binds only O3 to an already-present candidate role; the recorded counterexample is excluded without changing the relation family."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Ecosystem activity is stalled by repeated integration cost.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P069-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"], ["O1", "O3"], ["O1", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must concern defects in existing standards rather than absence of any standard.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Standards already exist in the ecosystem.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail fragmentation among existing standards.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The standards regime can be fragmented.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail incompatibility between two or more existing standards.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Existing standards can be mutually inconsistent.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail missing specification needed for reliable use.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Existing standards can be underspecified.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Existing standards are fragmented, mutually inconsistent, or underspecified.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "The existing standards regime lacks coherent sufficient specification.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P069-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Standardization is the positive convergence process and does not require currently fragmented standards.", "slug": "standardization"}], "residual_id": "r:interoperability_standardization:b036_a07_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b036_a07_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Existing standards are fragmented or underspecified. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Existing standards are fragmented or underspecified."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A content-wrong but fully decidable rule is expressly excluded; complete instances require a coarse rule that yields no decidable answer.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Rules-of-Engagement Ambiguity", "one_liner": "Diagnose frontline breakdown under time pressure as a grain mismatch — decision rules written coarser than the environment generates choice points — paid out of a finite discretion budget, relocating the fix from the operator's judgment to the rule, escalation path, and pre-positioned authority.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:rules_of_engagement_ambiguity", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "rules_of_engagement_ambiguity"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "rules_of_engagement_ambiguity", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P069-C06-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent SSD review confirms direct entailment of one complete DNF branch. The exact record directly satisfies the underspecified-existing-standards DNF branch. The candidate's defining exclusions defeat the counterexample while preserving every mapped principal role and causal direction."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Existing standards are fragmented, mutually inconsistent, or underspecified.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Participants need autonomy but must still interact.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The system needs commonality at the interaction boundary but diversity, autonomy, and local optimization inside each participant. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Participants need autonomy but must still interact. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Participants need autonomy but must still interact.", "The system needs commonality at the interaction boundary but diversity, autonomy, and local optimization inside each participant."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Participants need autonomy but must still interact."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 36, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-036", "ledger_sha256": "20ce48df4dd5970258608c63f432fecfd24d9d9b43f656a8ce22f00bbae0eb3f"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Intrinsic Signature Provenance", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:intrinsic_signature_provenance", "slug": "intrinsic_signature_provenance"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 5, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "An artifact, material, record, signal, or flow has moved away from its source, and the external story of origin is missing, broken, disputed, too expensive to maintain, or too easy to manipulate. The system needs provenance, authenticity, or source attribution, but ordinary traceability links and custody records cannot be assumed to survive the journey.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "An artifact, material, record, signal, or flow has moved away from its source, and the external story of origin is missing, broken, disputed, too expensive to maintain, or too easy to manipulate. The system needs provenance, authenticity, or source attribution, but ordinary traceability links and custody records cannot be assumed to survive the journey."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact relation infers formation context downstream after transport or mixing from a carried property.", "role_mapping": "Source -> formation context; later handling -> transport and mixing; recovery -> backward inference.", "slug": "signature_borne_provenance", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b036_a08_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Source, authenticity, path, or mixture contribution matters after transport, storage, transformation, copying, or exchange. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Source, authenticity, path, or mixture contribution matters after transport, storage, transformation, copying, or exchange."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Signature-Borne Provenance", "one_liner": "A conservative property carries origin through transport, read back without a custody chain.", "page_ref": "prime:signature_borne_provenance", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source -> formation context; later handling -> transport and mixing; recovery -> backward inference.", "slug": "signature_borne_provenance", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact relation infers formation context downstream after transport or mixing from a carried property."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Origin or source contribution must be recovered after transport, storage, transformation, copying, mixing, or exchange.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Custody-free inference rather than an external chain is the prime's defining contrast.", "role_mapping": "Weak labels or ledgers -> missing custody chain; intrinsic inference -> custody-free invariant.", "slug": "signature_borne_provenance", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b036_a08_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: External labels, ledgers, custody records, or actor testimony are missing, weak, adversarial, or impractical at scale. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["External labels, ledgers, custody records, or actor testimony are missing, weak, adversarial, or impractical at scale."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Signature-Borne Provenance", "one_liner": "A conservative property carries origin through transport, read back without a custody chain.", "page_ref": "prime:signature_borne_provenance", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Weak labels or ledgers -> missing custody chain; intrinsic inference -> custody-free invariant.", "slug": "signature_borne_provenance", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Custody-free inference rather than an external chain is the prime's defining contrast."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "External labels, custody records, ledgers, or testimony are absent, unreliable, adversarial, or impractical.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A conservative property set imprinted by origin and preserved through transport is mandatory.", "role_mapping": "Source-varying property -> signature; handling stability -> conservative carrier.", "slug": "signature_borne_provenance", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b036_a08_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The item or signal carries measurable properties that vary by source or production process and remain sufficiently stable during expected handling. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The item or signal carries measurable properties that vary by source or production process and remain sufficiently stable during expected handling."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Signature-Borne Provenance", "one_liner": "A conservative property carries origin through transport, read back without a custody chain.", "page_ref": "prime:signature_borne_provenance", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source-varying property -> signature; handling stability -> conservative carrier.", "slug": "signature_borne_provenance", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A conservative property set imprinted by origin and preserved through transport is mandatory."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The item carries measurable source-dependent properties that remain stable over expected handling.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact backward inference requires a signature library mapping measurements to formation contexts.", "role_mapping": "Reference set -> signature library; source classes -> formation contexts.", "slug": "signature_borne_provenance", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b036_a08_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A reference set exists, or can be built, for plausible source classes, production processes, geographies, instruments, batches, or origins. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A reference set exists, or can be built, for plausible source classes, production processes, geographies, instruments, batches, or origins."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Signature-Borne Provenance", "one_liner": "A conservative property carries origin through transport, read back without a custody chain.", "page_ref": "prime:signature_borne_provenance", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Reference set -> signature library; source classes -> formation contexts.", "slug": "signature_borne_provenance", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact backward inference requires a signature library mapping measurements to formation contexts."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A reference library maps plausible source classes or processes to expected signatures.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The library encodes likelihood of signatures given contexts and supports backward inference, inherently allowing probabilistic attribution.", "role_mapping": "Probability claim -> likelihood-based backward inference.", "slug": "signature_borne_provenance", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b036_a08_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The attribution claim can be expressed probabilistically rather than as absolute certainty. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The attribution claim can be expressed probabilistically rather than as absolute certainty."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Signature-Borne Provenance", "one_liner": "A conservative property carries origin through transport, read back without a custody chain.", "page_ref": "prime:signature_borne_provenance", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Probability claim -> likelihood-based backward inference.", "slug": "signature_borne_provenance", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The library encodes likelihood of signatures given contexts and supports backward inference, inherently allowing probabilistic attribution."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Origin is inferred probabilistically from the measured signature rather than claimed with absolute certainty.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "False attribution, contamination, substitution, or laundering would be costly enough to justify measurement and calibration.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: False attribution, contamination, substitution, or laundering would be costly enough to justify measurement and calibration. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["False attribution, contamination, substitution, or laundering would be costly enough to justify measurement and calibration."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "False attribution, contamination, substitution, or laundering would be costly enough to justify measurement and calibration."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 36, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-036", "ledger_sha256": "20ce48df4dd5970258608c63f432fecfd24d9d9b43f656a8ce22f00bbae0eb3f"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Invariant Guarding", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:invariant_guarding", "slug": "invariant_guarding"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is that change threatens a property the system depends on. Individual actors, operations, or automated steps may each seem reasonable, but their effects can combine into a state that violates safety, integrity, authority, identity, or legitimacy.\n\nInvariant failures often appear as impossible states: records that should not exist, orders that should not have been released, exceptions that should not have been approved, or configurations that should not have been reachable. These are signs that the invariant may be known culturally but not guarded structurally.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system changes over time, but some properties must remain stable for safety, integrity, identity, authority, or viability."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The atom states the mandatory preserved feature, named transformation set, scope, and preservation commitment.", "role_mapping": "Necessary property -> preserved feature; operations -> transformations; must remain -> invariance claim.", "slug": "invariance", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b036_a09_c12", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Multiple operations can alter a shared state, record, resource, or commitment. The property at risk is necessary rather than merely desirable. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1, 2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Multiple operations can alter a shared state, record, resource, or commitment.", "The property at risk is necessary rather than merely desirable."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Invariance", "one_liner": "Properties unchanged under transformation.", "page_ref": "prime:invariance", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Necessary property -> preserved feature; operations -> transformations; must remain -> invariance claim.", "slug": "invariance", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The atom states the mandatory preserved feature, named transformation set, scope, and preservation commitment."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A named necessary property must remain unchanged under every permitted operation on a shared state.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1, 2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P069-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve apparent or actual local validity rather than a transition that already fails locally.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A transition can satisfy its local checks.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve possibility of global violation without requiring every locally valid transition to fail.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The same transition can violate a wider invariant.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the local-versus-global scope contrast.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The violated property is wider in scope than the local checks.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must apply the violation to a safety property.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The wider invariant can concern safety.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must apply the violation to an integrity property.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The wider invariant can concern integrity.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must apply the violation to an authority property.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The wider invariant can concern authority.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must apply the violation to an identity property.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The wider invariant can concern identity.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "A transition can pass local checks while violating a wider invariant.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A locally valid transition can violate a global invariant.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P069-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Invariance is successful preservation under every named transformation; this atom describes a violating transition.", "slug": "invariance"}], "residual_id": "r:invariant_guarding:b036_a09_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b036_a09_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A transition may appear locally valid while breaking a wider safety, integrity, authority, or identity condition. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A transition may appear locally valid while breaking a wider safety, integrity, authority, or identity condition."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A control absent or wrong from inception is excluded; every decay instance has a once-working formally checked control whose wider protection has eroded.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Hazard-Control Decay", "one_liner": "Track the widening gap between what a safety control's paperwork says it does and what it actually does under hazard, so that a control certified sound by audit can be found silently unprotective before it fails.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:hazard_control_decay", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "hazard_control_decay"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "hazard_control_decay", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P069-C07-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent SSD review confirms direct entailment of one complete DNF branch. The candidate directly satisfies the safety branch. The candidate's defining exclusions defeat the counterexample while preserving every mapped principal role and causal direction."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A benign underperforming transfer is excluded; complete attack instances preserve an upstream threat despite clean downstream-local tests.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Transfer-Learning Attack", "one_liner": "Vulnerabilities, backdoors, or poisoned representations baked into an upstream pretrained model ride intact into every downstream system built on it, because the downstream team's audit boundary encloses only its new layers while the attack surface spans the whole inherited substrate.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:transfer_learning_attack", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "transfer_learning_attack"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "transfer_learning_attack", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P069-C07-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent SSD review confirms direct entailment of one complete DNF branch. The candidate directly satisfies the safety branch. The candidate's defining exclusions defeat the counterexample while preserving every mapped principal role and causal direction."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A missing-content crash is expressly excluded; complete instances silently pass the local content check while losing structural meaning.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Responsive-Layout Breakage", "one_liner": "Diagnose the silent UI failure where an interface's content survives a viewport, device, or locale transformation but its layout-encoded meaning — priority, adjacency, hierarchy, above-the-fold prominence — is lost, so a passing content-accessibility check actively conceals the defect.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:responsive_layout_breakage", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "responsive_layout_breakage"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "responsive_layout_breakage", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P069-C07-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent SSD review confirms direct entailment of one complete DNF branch. The candidate directly satisfies the integrity branch. The candidate's defining exclusions defeat the counterexample while preserving every mapped principal role and causal direction."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A genuinely fixed bug would not return when observation is removed; complete heisenbug instances preserve the wider defect despite the clean local trace.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Heisenbug", "one_liner": "Name the software defect whose failure vanishes under observation because attaching a debugger, adding a print, or disabling optimization perturbs the timing window or interleaving it rides on — so disappearance-under-observation is the diagnostic tell, not evidence the bug is gone.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:heisenbug", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "heisenbug"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "heisenbug", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P069-C07-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent SSD review confirms direct entailment of one complete DNF branch. The candidate directly satisfies the integrity branch. The candidate's defining exclusions defeat the counterexample while preserving every mapped principal role and causal direction."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Ordinary model degradation without reference drift is excluded; every erosion instance preserves the local-score/wider-validity divergence.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Gold-Standard Erosion", "one_liner": "Recognize that a model scored against a mutable reference label can show stable metrics while its real validity silently degrades, because the answer key — not the model — has drifted away from the construct it once operationalized.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:gold_standard_erosion", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "gold_standard_erosion"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "gold_standard_erosion", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P069-C07-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent SSD review confirms direct entailment of one complete DNF branch. The candidate directly satisfies the integrity branch. The candidate's defining exclusions defeat the counterexample while preserving every mapped principal role and causal direction."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A factor that individually breaches its bound is excluded; the candidate requires clean local factors and unsafe joint connectivity.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Latent-Path Activation", "one_liner": "Explain harm that arrives while every factor is individually in-range as a previously inert causal path going live only when a rare conjunction of gating states closes every edge along it at once.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:latent_path_activation", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "latent_path_activation"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "latent_path_activation", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P069-C07-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent SSD review confirms direct entailment of one complete DNF branch. The candidate directly satisfies the safety branch. The candidate's defining exclusions defeat the counterexample while preserving every mapped principal role and causal direction."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A transition can pass local checks while violating a wider safety, integrity, authority, or identity property.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P069-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must identify an informal evaluative check tied to invariant preservation.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Informal judgment is used to protect a system invariant.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve bypass possibility without requiring that a bypass has already occurred.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A system path can execute without that informal judgment.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must make an exception path bypass the judgment.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The bypass path can be an exception.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must make delegation bypass the judgment.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The bypass path can be delegation.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must make concurrent execution bypass the judgment.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The bypass path can be concurrency.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must make automated execution bypass the judgment.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The bypass path can be automation.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "A system path can bypass informal judgment that protects an invariant.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "System paths can bypass informal invariant enforcement.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P069-C08-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A bypassed safeguard can concern any control and does not necessarily involve a shared-state invariant.", "slug": "bypassed_safeguard"}], "residual_id": "r:invariant_guarding:b036_a09_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b036_a09_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The system has exceptions, delegation, concurrency, or automation that can bypass informal judgment. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The system has exceptions, delegation, concurrency, or automation that can bypass informal judgment."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A bypassed safeguard can concern any control and does not necessarily involve a shared-state invariant.", "slug": "bypassed_safeguard"}], "normalized_requirement": "Exceptions, delegation, concurrency, or automation can bypass informal invariant judgment.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Exceptions, delegation, concurrency, or automation can bypass informal invariant judgment.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Violations are costly to detect or reverse after the state is committed.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Violations are costly to detect or reverse after the state is committed. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Violations are costly to detect or reverse after the state is committed."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Violations are costly to detect or reverse after the state is committed."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 36, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-036", "ledger_sha256": "20ce48df4dd5970258608c63f432fecfd24d9d9b43f656a8ce22f00bbae0eb3f"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Invariant-Mode Decomposition Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:invariant_mode_decomposition_design", "slug": "invariant_mode_decomposition_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A transformation acts on many variables at once, but visible coordinates, surface metrics, or local symptoms do not reveal which directions are amplified, damped, preserved, reversed, or structurally dominant. Interventions then chase components rather than modes, miss unstable directions, or overfit behavior that is residual rather than modal.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A transformation acts on many variables at once, but visible coordinates, surface metrics, or local symptoms do not reveal which directions are amplified, damped, preserved, reversed, or structurally dominant. Interventions then chase components rather than modes, miss unstable directions, or overfit behavior that is residual rather than modal."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A recurring linear transformation on a space is the first mandatory role of the eigen-structure.", "role_mapping": "Process map -> recurring transformation; represented variables -> state space.", "slug": "eigenvalue_and_eigenvector", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b036_a10_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A process can be represented as a transformation, transition rule, linearized local model, covariance-like map, network update, or repeated operation. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A process can be represented as a transformation, transition rule, linearized local model, covariance-like map, network update, or repeated operation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Eigenvalue And Eigenvector", "one_liner": "A transformation's invariant directions and the scalars by which it stretches them.", "page_ref": "prime:eigenvalue_and_eigenvector", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Process map -> recurring transformation; represented variables -> state space.", "slug": "eigenvalue_and_eigenvector", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A recurring linear transformation on a space is the first mandatory role of the eigen-structure."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A recurring transformation or locally linearized operator acts on a state space.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Decomposition can separate independent parts and does not require coupled multivariate effects.", "slug": "decomposition"}], "residual_id": "r:invariant_mode_decomposition_design:b036_a10_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b036_a10_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Outcomes depend on combinations of variables rather than independent single variables. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Outcomes depend on combinations of variables rather than independent single variables."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Decomposition can separate independent parts and does not require coupled multivariate effects.", "slug": "decomposition"}], "normalized_requirement": "Observed outcomes depend on coupled combinations of variables rather than independent single-variable effects.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Observed outcomes depend on coupled combinations of variables rather than independent single-variable effects.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Invariant directions scaled by eigenvalues and a dominant long-run mode are the exact structure.", "role_mapping": "Directions -> eigenvectors; persistence/growth/decay -> scalar gains; dominance -> leading eigenmode.", "slug": "eigenvalue_and_eigenvector", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b036_a10_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Some directions persist, grow, decay, or dominate more predictably than others. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Some directions persist, grow, decay, or dominate more predictably than others."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Eigenvalue And Eigenvector", "one_liner": "A transformation's invariant directions and the scalars by which it stretches them.", "page_ref": "prime:eigenvalue_and_eigenvector", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Directions -> eigenvectors; persistence/growth/decay -> scalar gains; dominance -> leading eigenmode.", "slug": "eigenvalue_and_eigenvector", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Invariant directions scaled by eigenvalues and a dominant long-run mode are the exact structure."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Some directions are preserved while their amplitudes persist, grow, decay, or dominate under repeated transformation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Compression, control, stability, ranking, or explanation requires knowing which modes matter.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Practical control requires translating between surface variables and the transformation’s invariant directions without pretending the modal approximation is exact everywhere. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: Compression, control, stability, ranking, or explanation requires knowing which modes matter. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Compression, control, stability, ranking, or explanation requires knowing which modes matter.", "Practical control requires translating between surface variables and the transformation’s invariant directions without pretending the modal approximation is exact everywhere."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Compression, control, stability, ranking, or explanation requires knowing which modes matter."}, {"display_text": "A candidate modal model can be checked against raw behavior or residual reconstruction.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Interventions then chase components rather than modes, miss unstable directions, or overfit behavior that is residual rather than modal. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: A candidate modal model can be checked against raw behavior or residual reconstruction. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A candidate modal model can be checked against raw behavior or residual reconstruction.", "Interventions then chase components rather than modes, miss unstable directions, or overfit behavior that is residual rather than modal."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "A candidate modal model can be checked against raw behavior or residual reconstruction."}, {"display_text": "The system has enough stationarity or local validity for modal interpretation to be meaningful.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: The system has enough stationarity or local validity for modal interpretation to be meaningful. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The system has enough stationarity or local validity for modal interpretation to be meaningful."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The system has enough stationarity or local validity for modal interpretation to be meaningful."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 36, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-036", "ledger_sha256": "20ce48df4dd5970258608c63f432fecfd24d9d9b43f656a8ce22f00bbae0eb3f"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Invasive Entrant Containment", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:invasive_entrant_containment", "slug": "invasive_entrant_containment"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "prime_grounded_conditions": 5, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A newcomer moves from a context where its growth, behavior, or advantage was constrained into a recipient system where those controlling relations are absent, weak, delayed, or misclassified. Because the recipient system treats the entrant as ordinary, tolerable, useful, or too small to matter, the entrant crosses an establishment threshold and begins displacing resident actors, practices, species, norms, competitors, or resources before controls can be rebuilt.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A newcomer moves from a context where its growth, behavior, or advantage was constrained into a recipient system where those controlling relations are absent, weak, delayed, or misclassified. Because the recipient system treats the entrant as ordinary, tolerable, useful, or too small to matter, the entrant crosses an establishment threshold and begins displacing resident actors, practices, species, norms, competitors, or resources before controls can be rebuilt."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact structure requires a newcomer, host system, and introduction pathway.", "role_mapping": "Boundary pathway -> introduction route; entrant -> newcomer; recipient -> host.", "slug": "invasive_species", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b036_a11_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A boundary or pathway allows arrival from a source context into a recipient context. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A boundary or pathway allows arrival from a source context into a recipient context."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Invasive Species", "one_liner": "A newcomer enters a system whose native controls are absent or weak against it, and outpaces them to spread and displace incumbents before the system can adapt.", "page_ref": "prime:invasive_species", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Boundary pathway -> introduction route; entrant -> newcomer; recipient -> host.", "slug": "invasive_species", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact structure requires a newcomer, host system, and introduction pathway."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A pathway introduces an entrant from a source context into a recipient system.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Control-repertoire mismatch between newcomer and host is the load-bearing relation.", "role_mapping": "Source controls -> home regulation; missing recipient controls -> mismatch.", "slug": "invasive_species", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b036_a11_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The recipient context lacks one or more controls that kept the entrant bounded elsewhere. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The recipient context lacks one or more controls that kept the entrant bounded elsewhere."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Invasive Species", "one_liner": "A newcomer enters a system whose native controls are absent or weak against it, and outpaces them to spread and displace incumbents before the system can adapt.", "page_ref": "prime:invasive_species", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source controls -> home regulation; missing recipient controls -> mismatch.", "slug": "invasive_species", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Control-repertoire mismatch between newcomer and host is the load-bearing relation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Controls that bounded the entrant elsewhere are absent, weak, or mismatched in the recipient system.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact governing comparison is introduction-times-growth rate versus host adaptive-control rate.", "role_mapping": "Entrant propagation -> growth rate; local response -> adaptive-control rate; outpacing -> invasion condition.", "slug": "invasive_species", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b036_a11_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The entrant can reproduce, copy, recruit, exploit resources, or propagate faster than the local response cycle. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The entrant can reproduce, copy, recruit, exploit resources, or propagate faster than the local response cycle."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Invasive Species", "one_liner": "A newcomer enters a system whose native controls are absent or weak against it, and outpaces them to spread and displace incumbents before the system can adapt.", "page_ref": "prime:invasive_species", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Entrant propagation -> growth rate; local response -> adaptive-control rate; outpacing -> invasion condition.", "slug": "invasive_species", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact governing comparison is introduction-times-growth rate versus host adaptive-control rate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Entrant reproduction or propagation outpaces the recipient's adaptive response cycle.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P069-C09", "dnf": [], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [], "predicate": "Early observations of the entrant are sparse.", "resolution": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RESIDUAL", "semantic_scope": "NON_ABSTRACTION", "structural_head": "Early entrant observations are sparse.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P069-C09-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P069-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must concern early evidence about a newcomer entering a recipient system.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Observations concern an entrant at an early stage.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail semantic ambiguity rather than merely low observation count.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The observations support materially different interpretations.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Early observations of the entrant admit materially different interpretations.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Early entrant evidence is semantically ambiguous.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P069-C09-U2"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P069-C09", "dnf": [], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [], "predicate": "Early observations of the entrant are politically inconvenient.", "resolution": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RESIDUAL", "semantic_scope": "NON_ABSTRACTION", "structural_head": "Early entrant observations are politically inconvenient.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P069-C09-U3"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P069-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must identify observers evaluating early evidence about a newcomer.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Observers receive early evidence about an entrant.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the specific benign-novelty interpretation rather than generic uncertainty.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Observers classify the entrant as a harmless novelty.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must make the interpretation produce reduced evidential weight.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The harmless-novelty interpretation causes the evidence to be discounted.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Observers discount early entrant evidence by interpreting the entrant as harmless novelty.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A harmless-novelty frame discounts early entrant evidence.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P069-C09-U4"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The invasion relation can be recognized and acted upon immediately; political inconvenience or dismissal is not mandatory.", "slug": "invasive_species"}], "residual_id": "r:invasive_entrant_containment:b036_a11_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b036_a11_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Early observations are sparse, ambiguous, politically inconvenient, or discounted as harmless novelty. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Early observations are sparse, ambiguous, politically inconvenient, or discounted as harmless novelty."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PARTIALLY_DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "An established quiz contestant preserves the DSA but not the early-entrant obligation; the guard excludes that case.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Pratfall Effect", "one_liner": "A small, recoverable blunder raises observers' liking for an agent already judged highly competent — humanizing them by narrowing a status gap — while the same blunder lowers liking for a mediocre agent, so the impression update reverses sign depending on the prior competence estimate.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:pratfall_effect", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "observed_agent_is_early_stage_entrant", "predicate": "The agent whose minor blunder is observed is an early-stage entrant.", "rationale": "SSD passes after the qualifier: An established quiz contestant preserves the DSA but not the early-entrant obligation; the guard excludes that case. The guard applies one domain restriction to the existing observed agent role, is anchored in the candidate record, fills only O1, and neither restates the structural head nor introduces a principal role, causal relation, solution operation, or second independent fact."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "pratfall_effect"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The agent whose minor blunder is observed is an early-stage entrant."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "pratfall_effect", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P069-C09-U2", "why_it_fits": "Independent SSD review confirms the candidate supplies the same structural spine. One role restriction completes the broad interpretation unit. The adopted qualifier is sufficient and non-laundering because it binds only O1 to an already-present candidate role; the recorded counterexample is excluded without changing the relation family."}], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 2, "non_abstraction_units": 2, "resolved_units": 1, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The invasion relation can be recognized and acted upon immediately; political inconvenience or dismissal is not mandatory.", "slug": "invasive_species"}], "normalized_requirement": "Early entrant observations are sparse, ambiguous, inconvenient, or dismissed as harmless novelty.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "PARTIAL_EXISTING_DSA_GROUNDING", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation grounded 1 of 2 eligible atomic units; the remaining unit or units stayed open."}, "predicate": "Early entrant observations are sparse, ambiguous, inconvenient, or dismissed as harmless novelty.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The host repertoire is built for incumbents while the newcomer's profile evades it and displaces established relations.", "role_mapping": "Old regime adaptation -> native controls; inability to compete -> mismatch and displacement.", "slug": "invasive_species", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b036_a11_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Incumbents are adapted to the old control regime and cannot immediately compete, resist, or compensate. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Incumbents are adapted to the old control regime and cannot immediately compete, resist, or compensate."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Invasive Species", "one_liner": "A newcomer enters a system whose native controls are absent or weak against it, and outpaces them to spread and displace incumbents before the system can adapt.", "page_ref": "prime:invasive_species", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Old regime adaptation -> native controls; inability to compete -> mismatch and displacement.", "slug": "invasive_species", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The host repertoire is built for incumbents while the newcomer's profile evades it and displaces established relations."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Incumbents and host controls adapted to the old regime cannot initially contain or compete with the entrant.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Lag-then-release and the hysteresis invariant make early control cheaper and later removal non-restorative.", "role_mapping": "Late obvious harm -> post-expansion phase; higher removal cost -> lag advantage; lock-in -> hysteresis.", "slug": "invasive_species", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b036_a11_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: By the time aggregate harm becomes obvious, removal costs, collateral damage, or regime lock-in will be much higher. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["By the time aggregate harm becomes obvious, removal costs, collateral damage, or regime lock-in will be much higher."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Invasive Species", "one_liner": "A newcomer enters a system whose native controls are absent or weak against it, and outpaces them to spread and displace incumbents before the system can adapt.", "page_ref": "prime:invasive_species", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Late obvious harm -> post-expansion phase; higher removal cost -> lag advantage; lock-in -> hysteresis.", "slug": "invasive_species", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Lag-then-release and the hysteresis invariant make early control cheaper and later removal non-restorative."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "After visible aggregate displacement, removal is costlier and does not simply restore the prior state.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 36, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-036", "ledger_sha256": "20ce48df4dd5970258608c63f432fecfd24d9d9b43f656a8ce22f00bbae0eb3f"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Inventory-Bounded Resource Recomposition", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:inventory_bounded_resource_recomposition", "slug": "inventory_bounded_resource_recomposition"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A required outcome must be produced before ideal resources, infrastructure, specialists, or procurement can become available. The present stock is heterogeneous, partly purpose-specific, unevenly documented, and constrained by ownership, condition, compatibility, safety, and opportunity cost. Conventional labels hide alternative uses, while ungoverned improvisation risks unsafe substitution, destructive cannibalization, opaque dependencies, and permanent patchwork debt.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A required outcome must be produced before ideal resources, infrastructure, specialists, or procurement can become available. The present stock is heterogeneous, partly purpose-specific, unevenly documented, and constrained by ownership, condition, compatibility, safety, and opportunity cost. Conventional labels hide alternative uses, while ungoverned improvisation risks unsafe substitution, destructive cannibalization, opaque dependencies, and permanent patchwork debt."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact closed-inventory condition is fixed in the short action horizon, excluding resupply or new tooling.", "role_mapping": "Short decision window -> fixed short run; unavailable procurement -> closed inventory.", "slug": "bricolage", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b036_a12_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The decision window is shorter than ordinary procurement, hiring, redesign, or infrastructure deployment. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The decision window is shorter than ordinary procurement, hiring, redesign, or infrastructure deployment."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Bricolage", "one_liner": "Producing a working solution by recombining the heterogeneous resources at hand under a fixed inventory.", "page_ref": "prime:bricolage", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Short decision window -> fixed short run; unavailable procurement -> closed inventory.", "slug": "bricolage", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact closed-inventory condition is fixed in the short action horizon, excluding resupply or new tooling."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The decision window is too short for ordinary acquisition, hiring, redesign, or infrastructure deployment.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A fixed heterogeneous resource inventory is the prime's constitutive constraint.", "role_mapping": "Fixed available resources -> closed inventory; varied roles or facilities -> heterogeneity.", "slug": "bricolage", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b036_a12_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A materially fixed inventory of resources, capabilities, roles, information, authority, or facilities is available. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A materially fixed inventory of resources, capabilities, roles, information, authority, or facilities is available."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Bricolage", "one_liner": "Producing a working solution by recombining the heterogeneous resources at hand under a fixed inventory.", "page_ref": "prime:bricolage", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Fixed available resources -> closed inventory; varied roles or facilities -> heterogeneity.", "slug": "bricolage", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A fixed heterogeneous resource inventory is the prime's constitutive constraint."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A materially fixed heterogeneous inventory of resources or capabilities is available.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The load-bearing move repurposes and combines inventory elements to reach a target whose textbook inputs are absent.", "role_mapping": "Target functions -> desired output; alternative combinations -> recombinatorial move.", "slug": "bricolage", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b036_a12_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The desired outcome can be decomposed into functions that may be covered by alternative resources or combinations. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The desired outcome can be decomposed into functions that may be covered by alternative resources or combinations."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Bricolage", "one_liner": "Producing a working solution by recombining the heterogeneous resources at hand under a fixed inventory.", "page_ref": "prime:bricolage", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Target functions -> desired output; alternative combinations -> recombinatorial move.", "slug": "bricolage", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The load-bearing move repurposes and combines inventory elements to reach a target whose textbook inputs are absent."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A target can be achieved by recombining alternative resources to cover required functions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Affordance-over-purpose reading is mandatory in the exact record.", "role_mapping": "Latent capability -> affordance; conventional label -> designed purpose; repurposing -> affordance reading.", "slug": "bricolage", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b036_a12_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Available items have latent affordances, transferable capabilities, or repurposable features beyond their conventional labels. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Available items have latent affordances, transferable capabilities, or repurposable features beyond their conventional labels."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Bricolage", "one_liner": "Producing a working solution by recombining the heterogeneous resources at hand under a fixed inventory.", "page_ref": "prime:bricolage", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Latent capability -> affordance; conventional label -> designed purpose; repurposing -> affordance reading.", "slug": "bricolage", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Affordance-over-purpose reading is mandatory in the exact record."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Available items have latent affordances beyond their conventional designed purposes.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Interfaces and adaptations can be made explicit and tested rather than relying only on tacit local knowledge.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: Interfaces and adaptations can be made explicit and tested rather than relying only on tacit local knowledge. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Interfaces and adaptations can be made explicit and tested rather than relying only on tacit local knowledge."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Interfaces and adaptations can be made explicit and tested rather than relying only on tacit local knowledge."}, {"display_text": "There is authority to reassign, adapt, or consume resources within declared safety, rights, ownership, and professional limits.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The present stock is heterogeneous, partly purpose-specific, unevenly documented, and constrained by ownership, condition, compatibility, safety, and opportunity cost. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: There is authority to reassign, adapt, or consume resources within declared safety, rights, ownership, and professional limits. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["There is authority to reassign, adapt, or consume resources within declared safety, rights, ownership, and professional limits.", "The present stock is heterogeneous, partly purpose-specific, unevenly documented, and constrained by ownership, condition, compatibility, safety, and opportunity cost."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "There is authority to reassign, adapt, or consume resources within declared safety, rights, ownership, and professional limits."}, {"display_text": "A provisional solution can be monitored, maintained, replaced, or dismantled after the immediate constraint relaxes.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this deployment constraint: A provisional solution can be monitored, maintained, replaced, or dismantled after the immediate constraint relaxes. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A provisional solution can be monitored, maintained, replaced, or dismantled after the immediate constraint relaxes."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "A provisional solution can be monitored, maintained, replaced, or dismantled after the immediate constraint relaxes."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 36, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-036", "ledger_sha256": "20ce48df4dd5970258608c63f432fecfd24d9d9b43f656a8ce22f00bbae0eb3f"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Inversion of Control", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:inversion_of_control", "slug": "inversion_of_control"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 2, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a separation between control authority and contextual knowledge. One actor pushes work, supply, instruction, attention, service, or calls into another actor or layer, but the receiving side has the better information about when the action is useful.\n\nThis creates predictable symptoms: pushed work arrives too early, upstream actors overproduce, modules become tightly coupled, service providers miss episodic needs, and central coordinators spend effort polling or guessing. The system may still look orderly, but its order depends on the wrong side making timing decisions.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system depends on a normal direction of command, scheduling, production, or initiation, but that direction no longer matches where context, need, readiness, or timing information actually resides."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P069-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must identify a central controller responsible for timing the action.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A central actor controls or initiates an action.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require recurring readiness inference rather than one exceptional uncertainty.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The central actor must guess readiness repeatedly.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail that readiness is not directly known to the controller.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The central actor lacks direct access to the relevant readiness state.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must concern another actor's readiness.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The readiness holder can be another actor.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must concern a process stage's readiness.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The readiness holder can be a process stage.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must concern a recipient's readiness.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The readiness holder can be a recipient.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "A central actor repeatedly guesses when a downstream locus is ready for action.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A central controller repeatedly guesses downstream readiness.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P069-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Mission command decentralizes execution under shared intent but does not entail repeated readiness guessing by the center.", "slug": "mission_command"}], "residual_id": "r:inversion_of_control:b036_a13_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b036_a13_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A central actor must repeatedly guess when another actor, stage, or recipient is ready for action. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A central actor must repeatedly guess when another actor, stage, or recipient is ready for action."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Mission command decentralizes execution under shared intent but does not entail repeated readiness guessing by the center.", "slug": "mission_command"}], "normalized_requirement": "A central actor repeatedly guesses when another actor, stage, or recipient is ready.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A central actor repeatedly guesses when another actor, stage, or recipient is ready.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P069-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must identify direct control or invocation across distinct layers.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "One system layer directly calls another layer.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must link the direct calls to the adverse consequence.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The cross-layer calls cause a coordination defect.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail brittle dependency caused by the calls.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The defect can be brittle dependency.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail recurring coordination changes caused by the calls.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The defect can be frequent coordination changes.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}], "predicate": "Direct calls across layers cause brittle dependency or frequent coordination change.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Direct cross-layer control calls create coordination brittleness.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P069-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Inversion is a structure-preserving reversal operation and does not require software-layer calls or brittle coordination.", "slug": "inversion"}], "residual_id": "r:inversion_of_control:b036_a13_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b036_a13_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Direct calls from one layer to another create brittle dependencies or frequent coordination changes. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Direct calls from one layer to another create brittle dependencies or frequent coordination changes."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_GUARDED_EQUIVALENT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Spaghetti caused solely by intra-procedural goto edges preserves the DSA but fails O1; the guard excludes it.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Spaghetti Code", "one_liner": "Diagnose a codebase as unmaintainable by reading its dependency graph: when boundary-violating edges accumulate past a threshold, the cost of any local change scales with the whole system rather than the unit being changed.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:spaghetti_code", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "boundary_edges_are_direct_cross_layer_calls", "predicate": "The boundary-violating dependency edges are direct calls across declared system layers.", "rationale": "SSD passes after the qualifier: Spaghetti caused solely by intra-procedural goto edges preserves the DSA but fails O1; the guard excludes it. The guard applies one domain restriction to the existing boundary-violating dependency edges role, is anchored in the candidate record, fills only O1, and neither restates the structural head nor introduces a principal role, causal relation, solution operation, or second independent fact."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "spaghetti_code"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The boundary-violating dependency edges are direct calls across declared system layers."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "spaghetti_code", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P069-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent SSD review confirms the candidate supplies the same structural spine. One anchored boundary restriction completes the brittle-dependency branch. The adopted qualifier is sufficient and non-laundering because it binds only O1 to an already-present candidate role; the recorded counterexample is excluded without changing the relation family."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A long parameter list among functions within one layer preserves the DSA but fails O1; the guard excludes it.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Long Parameter List", "one_liner": "The code smell in which a function requires many separately-supplied inputs at its call boundary because internal complexity was offloaded onto callers — the defect being not the count but hidden co-variation structure that belongs inside the interface.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:long_parameter_list", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "caller_and_callee_are_distinct_layers", "predicate": "The function and its direct callers occupy distinct system layers.", "rationale": "SSD passes after the qualifier: A long parameter list among functions within one layer preserves the DSA but fails O1; the guard excludes it. The guard applies one domain restriction to the existing function and direct callers role, is anchored in the candidate record, fills only O1, and neither restates the structural head nor introduces a principal role, causal relation, solution operation, or second independent fact."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "long_parameter_list"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The function and its direct callers occupy distinct system layers."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "long_parameter_list", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P069-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent SSD review confirms the candidate supplies the same structural spine. One layer-role restriction completes the brittle-dependency branch. The adopted qualifier is sufficient and non-laundering because it binds only O1 to an already-present candidate role; the recorded counterexample is excluded without changing the relation family."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Direct calls across layers create brittle dependencies and frequent coordination changes.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P069-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve upstream-to-downstream initiation rather than downstream pull.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An upstream locus pushes an output to a downstream locus.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail absence of current downstream demand at initiation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Downstream need is not yet present when the output is pushed.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the premature ordering rather than excess after demand.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The upstream push occurs before downstream need.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must apply the premature push to production.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The pushed output can be production.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must apply the premature push to instruction.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The pushed output can be instruction.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must apply the premature push to communication.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The pushed output can be communication.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must apply the premature push to governance.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The pushed output can be governance.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "An upstream output is pushed before downstream need is present.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Upstream push precedes downstream demand.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P069-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Pull flow triggers activity at downstream demand; this is the inverse push state.", "slug": "pull_flow"}], "residual_id": "r:inversion_of_control:b036_a13_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b036_a13_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Upstream production, instruction, communication, or governance is pushed before downstream need is present. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Upstream production, instruction, communication, or governance is pushed before downstream need is present."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Make-to-order waits for confirmed need and is expressly excluded; every make-to-stock instance produces before the downstream order.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Make-to-Stock", "one_liner": "Produce finished goods ahead of any order against an aggregate forecast, placing the decoupling point as far downstream as it will go, so customer wait collapses to the order-to-pick interval at the price of holding cost and a binding forecast bet.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:make_to_stock", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "make_to_stock"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "make_to_stock", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P069-C12-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent SSD review confirms direct entailment of one complete DNF branch. The exact record directly satisfies the production branch. The candidate's defining exclusions defeat the counterexample while preserving every mapped principal role and causal direction."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Upstream output is pushed before downstream need is present.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P069-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must identify a controller that formally controls activation.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A nominal controller holds system activation authority.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the local information advantage over the nominal controller.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A local participant has better situational information than the controller.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail lack of activation authority at the better-informed locus.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The locally informed participant cannot activate the system.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must assign the information advantage to a local actor.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The locally informed participant can be a local actor.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must assign the information advantage to a recipient.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The locally informed participant can be a recipient.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "A local information holder knows more than the nominal controller but cannot activate the system.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Local readiness information is separated from activation authority.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P069-C13-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Structural inversion does not entail a central controller or an authority mismatch with local information.", "slug": "inversion"}], "residual_id": "r:inversion_of_control:b036_a13_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b036_a13_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Local actors or recipients have better situational information than the nominal controller, but cannot activate the system. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Local actors or recipients have better situational information than the nominal controller, but cannot activate the system."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Structural inversion does not entail a central controller or an authority mismatch with local information.", "slug": "inversion"}], "normalized_requirement": "Locally informed recipients cannot activate a centrally controlled system.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Locally informed recipients cannot activate a centrally controlled system.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P069-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require recurring transitions of work or control between loci.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A process contains repeated handoffs.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must make event information necessary to select the right next action.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The correct next action at a handoff depends on an event state.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail that the event lies outside the controller's immediate information.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The controlling actor cannot currently view the relevant event.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Repeated handoffs require a next action selected from events outside the controller's current view.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Handoff activation depends on events invisible to the controller.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P069-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Inversion can be mathematical or heuristic and need not concern handoffs, events, or control visibility.", "slug": "inversion"}], "residual_id": "r:inversion_of_control:b036_a13_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b036_a13_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A process contains repeated handoffs where the right next action depends on events outside the controller's immediate view. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A process contains repeated handoffs where the right next action depends on events outside the controller's immediate view."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Inversion can be mathematical or heuristic and need not concern handoffs, events, or control visibility.", "slug": "inversion"}], "normalized_requirement": "Repeated handoffs depend on events outside the controller's current view.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Repeated handoffs depend on events outside the controller's current view.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 36, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-036", "ledger_sha256": "20ce48df4dd5970258608c63f432fecfd24d9d9b43f656a8ce22f00bbae0eb3f"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Irreversible Commitment Management", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:irreversible_commitment_management", "slug": "irreversible_commitment_management"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is that ordinary decision workflows often treat all error as repairable. They optimize for speed, convenience, or local execution authority even when the action will change the system in a durable way. The result is a mismatch between process weight and consequence finality.\n\nIrreversibility also hides in boundaries. The actor who presses the button may see a local operation, while downstream users, ecosystems, legal positions, dependencies, or future options absorb the permanent effects. This archetype makes those hidden consequences part of the pre-commitment decision.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A consequential action is approaching a point beyond which the prior state cannot be fully restored and learning by full commitment would expose the system to irreversible harm or lock-in."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "This branch preserves the complete remedy-free diagnostic route; goals, feasibility clauses, gates, deployment constraints, and supporting context remain outside the DNF."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Every irreversible process has a privileged direction and cannot restore the exact prior state without lasting environmental debit, directly entailing the condition.", "role_mapping": "Initial and final states map to the prior and committed states; restoration debit maps to rollback residue.", "slug": "irreversibility", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "ext001_irreversible_commitment_management_a01", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored trigger_conditions, structural_problem fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: The system cannot return fully to its prior state, or rollback leaves lasting residue.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The system cannot return fully to its prior state, or rollback leaves lasting residue."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Irreversibility", "one_liner": "Cannot revert state.", "page_ref": "prime:irreversibility", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Initial and final states map to the prior and committed states; restoration debit maps to rollback residue.", "slug": "irreversibility", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Every irreversible process has a privileged direction and cannot restore the exact prior state without lasting environmental debit, directly entailing the condition."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The system cannot return fully to its prior state, or rollback leaves lasting residue.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "EXT001-C056", "dnf": [["EXT001-U056-O1"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"obligation_id": "EXT001-U056-O1", "predicate": "A recognizable point of no return is approaching."}], "predicate": "A recognizable point of no return is approaching.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A recognizable point of no return is approaching.", "unit_id": "EXT001-U056"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"catalog_exhaustion": "CONDITION_LEVEL", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: A recognizable point of no return is approaching.", "slug": "approach_avoidance_conflict"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: A recognizable point of no return is approaching.", "slug": "stability"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: A recognizable point of no return is approaching.", "slug": "operational_reach"}], "residual_id": "EXT001:irreversible_commitment_management:C02", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding."}}, "condition_id": "ext001_irreversible_commitment_management_a02", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored trigger_conditions, structural_problem fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: A recognizable point of no return is approaching.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A recognizable point of no return is approaching."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: A recognizable point of no return is approaching.", "slug": "approach_avoidance_conflict"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: A recognizable point of no return is approaching.", "slug": "stability"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: A recognizable point of no return is approaching.", "slug": "operational_reach"}], "normalized_requirement": "A recognizable point of no return is approaching.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A recognizable point of no return is approaching.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The Collingridge dilemma necessarily couples low early consequence knowledge with rising lock-in, so learning by deployment can expose the system to harm that becomes costly or impossible to reverse.", "role_mapping": "The rising information curve maps to uncertain consequences; the rising intervention-cost curve maps to irreversible harm from full commitment.", "slug": "collingridge_dilemma", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "ext001_irreversible_commitment_management_a04", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored trigger_conditions, structural_problem fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: Consequences remain uncertain and learning through full commitment could cause irreversible harm.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Consequences remain uncertain and learning through full commitment could cause irreversible harm."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Collingridge Dilemma", "one_liner": "Information about a system's consequences rises as the cost of changing it rises, so the window where intervention is both informed and feasible may be narrow or absent.", "page_ref": "prime:collingridge_dilemma", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "The rising information curve maps to uncertain consequences; the rising intervention-cost curve maps to irreversible harm from full commitment.", "slug": "collingridge_dilemma", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The Collingridge dilemma necessarily couples low early consequence knowledge with rising lock-in, so learning by deployment can expose the system to harm that becomes costly or impossible to reverse."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Consequences remain uncertain and learning through full commitment could cause irreversible harm.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The action affects safety, rights, privacy, ecology, custody, trust, or long-term options.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored trigger_conditions, structural_problem fields; the source file was not modified. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: The action affects safety, rights, privacy, ecology, custody, trust, or long-term options. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The action affects safety, rights, privacy, ecology, custody, trust, or long-term options.", "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored trigger_conditions, structural_problem fields; the source file was not modified."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "The action affects safety, rights, privacy, ecology, custody, trust, or long-term options."}, {"display_text": "Legitimate commitment requires consent, expert review, or accountable authority.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored trigger_conditions, structural_problem fields; the source file was not modified. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: Legitimate commitment requires consent, expert review, or accountable authority. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Legitimate commitment requires consent, expert review, or accountable authority.", "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored trigger_conditions, structural_problem fields; the source file was not modified."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Legitimate commitment requires consent, expert review, or accountable authority."}, {"display_text": "Residual obligations will remain even if the action is justified.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored trigger_conditions, structural_problem fields; the source file was not modified. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: Residual obligations will remain even if the action is justified. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Residual obligations will remain even if the action is justified.", "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored trigger_conditions, structural_problem fields; the source file was not modified."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Residual obligations will remain even if the action is justified."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"candidate_ledger_sha256": "96f72d2139077fd57bf795048ebef33b3fd574b20963170080ec916b5b3b92fe", "extension_id": "new-archetypes-extension-001", "ledger_id": "prime-production-v1.2-extension-001", "ledger_sha256": "9644520614744632d1d36da44b1acd77ce432852c6083eb871203521c166efce"}, "base_projection_sha256": "841e0c7f3cb8e8054475ad29a8a14745a416b4fc115559a44878b94292e673ec", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "ca09ed9fe1598ce7072755b530de5553f5ee0a7cd64ae82d9e4a4e2149a37788", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Iterative Reciprocity and Repeated Interaction", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:iterative_reciprocity_and_repeated_interaction", "slug": "iterative_reciprocity_and_repeated_interaction"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A shared benefit, public good, commons, team output, or reciprocal service depends on contributions from many actors, but individual actors can receive the benefit while withholding effort, cost, risk, information, or maintenance. Because interaction is anonymous, one-shot, weakly remembered, or disconnected from future access, noncontributors do not face meaningful relational consequence, and contributors gradually reduce their own effort or exit.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A shared benefit, public good, commons, team output, or reciprocal service depends on contributions from many actors, but individual actors can receive the benefit while withholding effort, cost, risk, information, or maintenance. Because interaction is anonymous, one-shot, weakly remembered, or disconnected from future access, noncontributors do not face meaningful relational consequence, and contributors gradually reduce their own effort or exit."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The atom states individually rational defection against a Pareto-superior cooperative outcome.", "role_mapping": "Undercontribution -> defection; shared benefit -> cooperative surplus; unsustained system -> worse collective equilibrium.", "slug": "social_dilemma", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The exact mechanism presupposes a defection-inducing interaction whose one-shot payoff makes cooperation need explanation.", "role_mapping": "Free-rider gain -> present defection gain; shared benefit -> cooperative alternative.", "slug": "shadow_of_the_future", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b036_a14_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A shared benefit is available even to actors who do not contribute enough to sustain it. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A shared benefit is available even to actors who do not contribute enough to sustain it."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Social Dilemma", "one_liner": "Individually rational defection yields a collectively worse outcome (canonical form: the Prisoner's Dilemma).", "page_ref": "prime:social_dilemma", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Undercontribution -> defection; shared benefit -> cooperative surplus; unsustained system -> worse collective equilibrium.", "slug": "social_dilemma", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The atom states individually rational defection against a Pareto-superior cooperative outcome."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Shadow Of The Future", "one_liner": "Expectations of continued interaction plus observability of past behaviour convert one-shot dilemmas into self-sustaining cooperation without contracts or altruism.", "page_ref": "prime:shadow_of_the_future", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Free-rider gain -> present defection gain; shared benefit -> cooperative alternative.", "slug": "shadow_of_the_future", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact mechanism presupposes a defection-inducing interaction whose one-shot payoff makes cooperation need explanation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "An actor can obtain the cooperative surplus while defecting or undercontributing, making the one-shot private incentive conflict with joint welfare.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A non-trivial continuation horizon is mandatory.", "role_mapping": "Future encounters -> expected continuation horizon.", "slug": "shadow_of_the_future", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "Reciprocity is a repeated or durable interaction in which current contributions are expected to be returned.", "role_mapping": "Continued interaction -> durable exchange; later consequence -> return expectation.", "slug": "reciprocity", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b036_a14_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Participants expect future encounters, or the system could be redesigned so future encounters matter. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Participants expect future encounters, or the system could be redesigned so future encounters matter."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Shadow Of The Future", "one_liner": "Expectations of continued interaction plus observability of past behaviour convert one-shot dilemmas into self-sustaining cooperation without contracts or altruism.", "page_ref": "prime:shadow_of_the_future", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Future encounters -> expected continuation horizon.", "slug": "shadow_of_the_future", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A non-trivial continuation horizon is mandatory."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Reciprocity", "one_liner": "Mutual exchange.", "page_ref": "prime:reciprocity", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Continued interaction -> durable exchange; later consequence -> return expectation.", "slug": "reciprocity", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Reciprocity is a repeated or durable interaction in which current contributions are expected to be returned."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Participants expect continued interaction in which present conduct can affect later exchange.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Observability of past behavior to future partners is mandatory.", "role_mapping": "Observed conduct -> observability mechanism; later treatment -> future interaction.", "slug": "shadow_of_the_future", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "Current actions depend on others' past actions, requiring the relevant behavior to be legible.", "role_mapping": "Observed contribution -> past action; contingent response -> reciprocal action.", "slug": "reciprocity", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "Observed conduct aggregated into a record that changes future treatment is the exact reputation loop.", "role_mapping": "Recorded behavior -> conduct channel; future treatment -> reputational feedback.", "slug": "reputation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b036_a14_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Contribution, defection, or maintenance behavior can be observed or recorded at least roughly. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Contribution, defection, or maintenance behavior can be observed or recorded at least roughly."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Shadow Of The Future", "one_liner": "Expectations of continued interaction plus observability of past behaviour convert one-shot dilemmas into self-sustaining cooperation without contracts or altruism.", "page_ref": "prime:shadow_of_the_future", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Observed conduct -> observability mechanism; later treatment -> future interaction.", "slug": "shadow_of_the_future", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Observability of past behavior to future partners is mandatory."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Reciprocity", "one_liner": "Mutual exchange.", "page_ref": "prime:reciprocity", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Observed contribution -> past action; contingent response -> reciprocal action.", "slug": "reciprocity", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Current actions depend on others' past actions, requiring the relevant behavior to be legible."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Reputation", "one_liner": "An aggregated signal of past behaviour that shapes how others treat an agent.", "page_ref": "prime:reputation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Recorded behavior -> conduct channel; future treatment -> reputational feedback.", "slug": "reputation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Observed conduct aggregated into a record that changes future treatment is the exact reputation loop."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Contribution or defection behavior is observable or recorded well enough to condition future treatment.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact invariant makes cooperation an equilibrium of horizon and observability rather than a trait.", "role_mapping": "Future access -> continuation stakes; reputation -> observability; cooperation -> repeated-game equilibrium.", "slug": "shadow_of_the_future", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "Conditional return of contributions across durable interaction is the exact reciprocal mechanism.", "role_mapping": "Cooperation -> contribution; future response -> return in kind.", "slug": "reciprocity", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b036_a14_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Cooperation depends on trust, norms, future access, partnership continuity, reputation, or membership standing. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Cooperation depends on trust, norms, future access, partnership continuity, reputation, or membership standing."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Shadow Of The Future", "one_liner": "Expectations of continued interaction plus observability of past behaviour convert one-shot dilemmas into self-sustaining cooperation without contracts or altruism.", "page_ref": "prime:shadow_of_the_future", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Future access -> continuation stakes; reputation -> observability; cooperation -> repeated-game equilibrium.", "slug": "shadow_of_the_future", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact invariant makes cooperation an equilibrium of horizon and observability rather than a trait."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Reciprocity", "one_liner": "Mutual exchange.", "page_ref": "prime:reciprocity", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Cooperation -> contribution; future response -> return in kind.", "slug": "reciprocity", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Conditional return of contributions across durable interaction is the exact reciprocal mechanism."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Cooperation is sustained by expected future access, reciprocal response, or reputation rather than one-shot altruism.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P069-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must concern withheld or absent contribution in a system dependent on contribution.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The system observes noncontribution to a shared reciprocal arrangement.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must include nonexploitative incapacity as one classification target.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "One possible class is temporary inability to contribute.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must include persistent exploitative noncontribution as the contrasting target.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The contrasting class is persistent exploitative noncontribution.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve both the temporary-versus-persistent and inability-versus-exploitative-noncontribution contrasts without requiring intent.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The two classes differ in duration and in inability-versus-exploitative-noncontribution status.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail a necessary discrimination capability, not merely that the classes exist.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The system must distinguish the two classes.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "The system must distinguish temporary inability to contribute from persistent exploitative noncontribution.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Reciprocity governance must distinguish inability from exploitation.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P069-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Reciprocity can respond to observed noncontribution without correctly classifying its cause as temporary inability or exploitation.", "slug": "reciprocity"}], "residual_id": "r:iterative_reciprocity_and_repeated_interaction:b036_a14_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b036_a14_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The system needs to distinguish temporary inability to contribute from persistent exploitative noncontribution. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The system needs to distinguish temporary inability to contribute from persistent exploitative noncontribution."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Reciprocity can respond to observed noncontribution without correctly classifying its cause as temporary inability or exploitation.", "slug": "reciprocity"}], "normalized_requirement": "The system must distinguish temporary inability to contribute from persistent exploitative noncontribution.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The system must distinguish temporary inability to contribute from persistent exploitative noncontribution.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Formal punishment alone is too costly, brittle, or legitimacy-damaging, but purely voluntary contribution is decaying.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Formal punishment alone is too costly, brittle, or legitimacy-damaging, but purely voluntary contribution is decaying. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Formal punishment alone is too costly, brittle, or legitimacy-damaging, but purely voluntary contribution is decaying."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Formal punishment alone is too costly, brittle, or legitimacy-damaging, but purely voluntary contribution is decaying."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 36, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-036", "ledger_sha256": "20ce48df4dd5970258608c63f432fecfd24d9d9b43f656a8ce22f00bbae0eb3f"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Iterative Refinement Loop", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:iterative_refinement_loop", "slug": "iterative_refinement_loop"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is that the target is partly unknown until someone tries to make, perform, run, or test it. A one-shot plan hides errors until late. A purely reactive process changes too much without learning. A static specification cannot absorb new evidence.\n\nThe loop solves this by making the current state inspectable. A draft, prototype, practice attempt, policy pilot, current workflow, or model output becomes a learning object. Feedback then exposes the gap between the current attempt and the desired state. The next cycle is not a fresh start; it is a revision informed by what the previous cycle revealed.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "The desired outcome is uncertain, complex, context-sensitive, or hard to achieve in one pass, while one-shot planning, static specification, or isolated execution would hide errors until commitment is costly."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Refinement can iteratively improve toward a fully specified target; advance incompleteness is not mandatory.", "slug": "refinement"}], "residual_id": "r:iterative_refinement_loop:b036_a15_c1", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b036_a15_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The target cannot be fully specified in advance. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The target cannot be fully specified in advance."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Refinement can iteratively improve toward a fully specified target; advance incompleteness is not mandatory.", "slug": "refinement"}], "normalized_requirement": "The target cannot be fully specified before work begins.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The target cannot be fully specified before work begins.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact loop is approximation, evaluation of divergence, targeted adjustment, and repetition.", "role_mapping": "Feedback -> divergence evaluation; later attempt -> adjustment cycle.", "slug": "refinement", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b036_a15_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Feedback can improve later attempts. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Feedback can improve later attempts."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Refinement", "one_liner": "Iteratively improving a candidate solution toward adequacy through repeated cycles of evaluation and adjustment that narrow the gap to a target, rather than deriving the answer in one shot.", "page_ref": "prime:refinement", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Feedback -> divergence evaluation; later attempt -> adjustment cycle.", "slug": "refinement", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact loop is approximation, evaluation of divergence, targeted adjustment, and repetition."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Evaluation feedback from one candidate guides adjustment of the next attempt.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Reusable incremental modifications rather than wholesale redesign are mandatory.", "role_mapping": "Revision tolerance -> reusable candidate; repeated changes -> incremental adjustment.", "slug": "refinement", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b036_a15_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The object of work can tolerate revision. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The object of work can tolerate revision."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Refinement", "one_liner": "Iteratively improving a candidate solution toward adequacy through repeated cycles of evaluation and adjustment that narrow the gap to a target, rather than deriving the answer in one shot.", "page_ref": "prime:refinement", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Revision tolerance -> reusable candidate; repeated changes -> incremental adjustment.", "slug": "refinement", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Reusable incremental modifications rather than wholesale redesign are mandatory."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The work product can tolerate repeated incremental revision rather than one-shot replacement.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact structure is an explicit checkable predicate evaluated on iterative process state to decide stop versus continue.", "role_mapping": "Refinement loop -> unfolding process; acceptance or pivot rule -> halting predicate.", "slug": "termination_condition", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b036_a15_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A stopping, acceptance, or pivot rule can be stated. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A stopping, acceptance, or pivot rule can be stated."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Termination Condition", "one_liner": "An explicit, checkable predicate that decides whether an iterative or recursive process stops or continues.", "page_ref": "prime:termination_condition", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Refinement loop -> unfolding process; acceptance or pivot rule -> halting predicate.", "slug": "termination_condition", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact structure is an explicit checkable predicate evaluated on iterative process state to decide stop versus continue."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "An explicit checkable acceptance, stopping, or pivot predicate can bound the iterative process.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Quality depends on fit to context.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when the desired outcome depends on users, reviewers, evidence, context, performance data, or constraints that are hard to know abstractly. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Quality depends on fit to context. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Quality depends on fit to context.", "It is especially useful when the desired outcome depends on users, reviewers, evidence, context, performance data, or constraints that are hard to know abstractly."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Quality depends on fit to context."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 36, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-036", "ledger_sha256": "20ce48df4dd5970258608c63f432fecfd24d9d9b43f656a8ce22f00bbae0eb3f"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Kairotic Window Alignment", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:kairotic_window_alignment", "slug": "kairotic_window_alignment"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 5, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A message, decision, resource, offer, warning, therapy, policy, or intervention is designed as though effectiveness belongs mainly to the action itself. In reality, the receiving system’s state is changing. The action is ignored before attention or readiness opens, backfires when trust or capacity is low, becomes too late after the decision has locked in, or turns noisy after the receiver has entered fatigue or a refractory interval.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A message, decision, resource, offer, warning, therapy, policy, or intervention is designed as though effectiveness belongs mainly to the action itself. In reality, the receiving system’s state is changing. The action is ignored before attention or readiness opens, backfires when trust or capacity is low, becomes too late after the decision has locked in, or turns noisy after the receiver has entered fatigue or a refractory interval."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's core is effectiveness governed by transient receiver state rather than action quality alone.", "role_mapping": "Same action -> fit action; timing-dependent effect -> receiving-system receptivity.", "slug": "kairos", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b037_a01_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The same action has substantially different effects depending on when it is delivered. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The same action has substantially different effects depending on when it is delivered."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Kairos", "one_liner": "An action's effectiveness depends not on its own quality but on its alignment with a transient state of the receiving system — a window that opens and closes.", "page_ref": "prime:kairos", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Same action -> fit action; timing-dependent effect -> receiving-system receptivity.", "slug": "kairos", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's core is effectiveness governed by transient receiver state rather than action quality alone."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The same action has substantially different effects as the receiving system moves through time-varying states.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact receiving system has time-varying receptivity and an opening-closing window.", "role_mapping": "Receiver capacities -> state-bearer; temporal change -> window dynamics.", "slug": "kairos", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b037_a01_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The receiver has bounded attention, readiness, trust, capacity, permission, urgency, or authority that changes over time. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The receiver has bounded attention, readiness, trust, capacity, permission, urgency, or authority that changes over time."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Kairos", "one_liner": "An action's effectiveness depends not on its own quality but on its alignment with a transient state of the receiving system — a window that opens and closes.", "page_ref": "prime:kairos", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Receiver capacities -> state-bearer; temporal change -> window dynamics.", "slug": "kairos", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact receiving system has time-varying receptivity and an opening-closing window."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Receiver attention, readiness, trust, capacity, permission, urgency, or authority opens and closes over time.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Detection capacity instrumenting receiver state is mandatory in the exact record.", "role_mapping": "Sensing or forecast -> detection capacity; opening -> instrumented receiver state.", "slug": "kairos", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b037_a01_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The relevant opening can be sensed, forecast, probed, or bounded better than random guessing. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The relevant opening can be sensed, forecast, probed, or bounded better than random guessing."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Kairos", "one_liner": "An action's effectiveness depends not on its own quality but on its alignment with a transient state of the receiving system — a window that opens and closes.", "page_ref": "prime:kairos", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Sensing or forecast -> detection capacity; opening -> instrumented receiver state.", "slug": "kairos", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Detection capacity instrumenting receiver state is mandatory in the exact record."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The opening can be sensed, forecast, probed, or bounded better than random guessing.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Opening and closing dynamics make both premature and late delivery fail for different reasons.", "role_mapping": "Too early -> pre-opening state; too late -> closing edge.", "slug": "kairos", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b037_a01_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Acting too early consumes credibility or attention; acting too late misses lock-in, saturation, or decision closure. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Acting too early consumes credibility or attention; acting too late misses lock-in, saturation, or decision closure."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Kairos", "one_liner": "An action's effectiveness depends not on its own quality but on its alignment with a transient state of the receiving system — a window that opens and closes.", "page_ref": "prime:kairos", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Too early -> pre-opening state; too late -> closing edge.", "slug": "kairos", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Opening and closing dynamics make both premature and late delivery fail for different reasons."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Acting before the opening wastes credibility or attention, while acting after it misses closure or lock-in.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The action-cycle-versus-window-duration invariant requires a pre-positioned action when the window is shorter than preparation time.", "role_mapping": "Prepared sender -> pre-positioned action; slow design cycle -> action-cycle mismatch.", "slug": "kairos", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b037_a01_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The sender can prepare before the window, because normal design cycles are too slow once the window opens. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The sender can prepare before the window, because normal design cycles are too slow once the window opens."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Kairos", "one_liner": "An action's effectiveness depends not on its own quality but on its alignment with a transient state of the receiving system — a window that opens and closes.", "page_ref": "prime:kairos", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Prepared sender -> pre-positioned action; slow design cycle -> action-cycle mismatch.", "slug": "kairos", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The action-cycle-versus-window-duration invariant requires a pre-positioned action when the window is shorter than preparation time."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The action must be prepared before the window because its duration is shorter than the normal design cycle.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The intervention must preserve legitimacy, agency, or consent rather than merely exploiting vulnerability.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this deployment constraint: The intervention must preserve legitimacy, agency, or consent rather than merely exploiting vulnerability. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The intervention must preserve legitimacy, agency, or consent rather than merely exploiting vulnerability."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The intervention must preserve legitimacy, agency, or consent rather than merely exploiting vulnerability."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 37, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-037", "ledger_sha256": "859a7568072d93bdeb3981bd17279e1107b1f42fb0bdb7c9ee9ecd0be83bcdd4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Knowing-Doing Bridge Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:knowing_doing_bridge_design", "slug": "knowing_doing_bridge_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A person, team, institution, or public already knows the appropriate action, and often agrees with it, but still fails to perform it because knowledge is stored in one cognitive, social, or organizational channel while action is produced by another channel governed by cues, timing, resources, authority, emotion, friction, habit, social context, and feedback.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A person, team, institution, or public already knows the appropriate action, and often agrees with it, but still fails to perform it because knowledge is stored in one cognitive, social, or organizational channel while action is produced by another channel governed by cues, timing, resources, authority, emotion, friction, habit, social context, and feedback."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The atom states intact correct knowledge and divergent action, the two load-bearing subsystems.", "role_mapping": "Correct statement -> knowledge subsystem; nonperformance -> divergent action subsystem.", "slug": "knowledge_action_gap", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b037_a02_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: People can correctly state what should be done but do not do it in the relevant moment. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["People can correctly state what should be done but do not do it in the relevant moment."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Knowledge-Action Gap", "one_liner": "An agent holds accurate knowledge of the appropriate action, sincerely intends to take it, and systematically does not — because knowing and doing are separable load-bearing states and intervention on the knowing channel does not, by itself, change the doing channel.", "page_ref": "prime:knowledge_action_gap", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Correct statement -> knowledge subsystem; nonperformance -> divergent action subsystem.", "slug": "knowledge_action_gap", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The atom states intact correct knowledge and divergent action, the two load-bearing subsystems."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Agents correctly state the appropriate action yet systematically fail to perform it at the relevant moment.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Knowledge-inertness—more knowing-channel intervention without doing-channel change—is the exact diagnostic invariant.", "role_mapping": "Briefing or training -> knowledge intervention; unchanged behavior -> knowledge-inertness.", "slug": "knowledge_action_gap", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b037_a02_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Awareness campaigns, briefings, policies, or trainings improve stated knowledge without changing behavior. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Awareness campaigns, briefings, policies, or trainings improve stated knowledge without changing behavior."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Knowledge-Action Gap", "one_liner": "An agent holds accurate knowledge of the appropriate action, sincerely intends to take it, and systematically does not — because knowing and doing are separable load-bearing states and intervention on the knowing channel does not, by itself, change the doing channel.", "page_ref": "prime:knowledge_action_gap", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Briefing or training -> knowledge intervention; unchanged behavior -> knowledge-inertness.", "slug": "knowledge_action_gap", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Knowledge-inertness—more knowing-channel intervention without doing-channel change—is the exact diagnostic invariant."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Additional information or training improves stated knowledge without changing behavior.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Systematic divergence between sincere intended action and observed output is mandatory.", "role_mapping": "Intended action -> correct knowledge and intent; repeated omission -> divergent action.", "slug": "knowledge_action_gap", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b037_a02_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The desired action is repeatedly postponed, omitted, delegated ambiguously, or replaced by easier defaults. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The desired action is repeatedly postponed, omitted, delegated ambiguously, or replaced by easier defaults."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Knowledge-Action Gap", "one_liner": "An agent holds accurate knowledge of the appropriate action, sincerely intends to take it, and systematically does not — because knowing and doing are separable load-bearing states and intervention on the knowing channel does not, by itself, change the doing channel.", "page_ref": "prime:knowledge_action_gap", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Intended action -> correct knowledge and intent; repeated omission -> divergent action.", "slug": "knowledge_action_gap", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Systematic divergence between sincere intended action and observed output is mandatory."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The intended action is repeatedly postponed, omitted, ambiguously delegated, or displaced by an easier default.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Every gap has a localized transmission weakness, but the exact repertoire also includes ownership, opportunity, scaffolding, feedback, and temporal discounting not guaranteed by this list.", "slug": "knowledge_action_gap"}], "residual_id": "r:knowing_doing_bridge_design:b037_a02_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b037_a02_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Agents sincerely intend to act but encounter activation energy, missing resources, unclear triggers, weak cues, conflicting incentives, or social friction. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Agents sincerely intend to act but encounter activation energy, missing resources, unclear triggers, weak cues, conflicting incentives, or social friction."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Every gap has a localized transmission weakness, but the exact repertoire also includes ownership, opportunity, scaffolding, feedback, and temporal discounting not guaranteed by this list.", "slug": "knowledge_action_gap"}], "normalized_requirement": "Sincere intent encounters activation, resource, cue, incentive, or social-friction barriers.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Sincere intent encounters activation, resource, cue, incentive, or social-friction barriers.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P070-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must include an informational transfer or delivery event.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Knowledge has been transferred to the intended actor or system.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must equate or substitute delivered knowledge for completed action, not merely note a knowledge-action gap.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The system treats that knowledge transfer as completion of execution.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require missing execution evidence while the completion judgment is maintained.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Evidence that the intended execution occurred is absent.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "A system treats completed knowledge transfer as completed execution despite lacking execution evidence.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Knowledge transfer is treated as execution completion without execution evidence.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P070-C01-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A knowledge-action gap can be recognized accurately and need not be misclassified as completed execution.", "slug": "knowledge_action_gap"}], "residual_id": "r:knowing_doing_bridge_design:b037_a02_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b037_a02_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A system treats knowledge transfer as completion even though execution evidence remains absent. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A system treats knowledge transfer as completion even though execution evidence remains absent."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A knowledge-action gap can be recognized accurately and need not be misclassified as completed execution.", "slug": "knowledge_action_gap"}], "normalized_requirement": "A system treats knowledge transfer as completion despite absent execution evidence.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A system treats knowledge transfer as completion despite absent execution evidence.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Failure of repeated information to close the wedge directly instantiates the knowledge-inertness invariant.", "role_mapping": "Reminders -> repeated knowledge input; recurrence -> unchanged doing channel.", "slug": "knowledge_action_gap", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b037_a02_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The same failure recurs after reminders because reminders do not change the action environment. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The same failure recurs after reminders because reminders do not change the action environment."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Knowledge-Action Gap", "one_liner": "An agent holds accurate knowledge of the appropriate action, sincerely intends to take it, and systematically does not — because knowing and doing are separable load-bearing states and intervention on the knowing channel does not, by itself, change the doing channel.", "page_ref": "prime:knowledge_action_gap", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Reminders -> repeated knowledge input; recurrence -> unchanged doing channel.", "slug": "knowledge_action_gap", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Failure of repeated information to close the wedge directly instantiates the knowledge-inertness invariant."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The failure recurs after reminders because repeated knowledge-channel input leaves the action environment unchanged.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The action must occur under load, time pressure, distraction, emotion, fatigue, low salience, or competing routines.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A person, team, institution, or public already knows the appropriate action, and often agrees with it, but still fails to perform it because knowledge is stored in one cognitive, social, or organizational channel while action is produced by another channel governed by cues, timing, resources, authority, emotion, friction, habit, social context, and feedback. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The action must occur under load, time pressure, distraction, emotion, fatigue, low salience, or competing routines. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The action must occur under load, time pressure, distraction, emotion, fatigue, low salience, or competing routines.", "A person, team, institution, or public already knows the appropriate action, and often agrees with it, but still fails to perform it because knowledge is stored in one cognitive, social, or organizational channel while action is produced by another channel governed by cues, timing, resources, authority, emotion, friction, habit, social context, and feedback."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The action must occur under load, time pressure, distraction, emotion, fatigue, low salience, or competing routines."}, {"display_text": "The gap matters enough that inaction causes harm, risk, waste, lost opportunity, or unjust blame.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The gap matters enough that inaction causes harm, risk, waste, lost opportunity, or unjust blame. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The gap matters enough that inaction causes harm, risk, waste, lost opportunity, or unjust blame."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 8, "text": "The gap matters enough that inaction causes harm, risk, waste, lost opportunity, or unjust blame."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 37, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-037", "ledger_sha256": "859a7568072d93bdeb3981bd17279e1107b1f42fb0bdb7c9ee9ecd0be83bcdd4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Knowledge Map Navigation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:knowledge_map_navigation", "slug": "knowledge_map_navigation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "People cannot find, sequence, integrate, or apply knowledge because the structure of the domain is hidden, fragmented, stale, or represented only as a flat collection of topics and documents.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "People cannot find, sequence, integrate, or apply knowledge because the structure of the domain is hidden, fragmented, stale, or represented only as a flat collection of topics and documents."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P070-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must concern knowledge or information artifacts about one domain.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Knowledge concerning a common domain is represented in source artifacts.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require plural fragmented sources rather than a single repository or one source with many sections.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "That knowledge is distributed across many independent sources.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail absence of common domain-level location, relation, or sequencing structure.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The sources lack a shared layer that orients them within the domain.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Knowledge about one domain is distributed across many independent sources that lack a shared orientation layer.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Fragmented knowledge sources lack a common domain-orientation layer.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P070-C02-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Navigation can operate over a unified source and does not entail fragmentation.", "slug": "navigation"}], "residual_id": "r:knowledge_map_navigation:b037_a03_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b037_a03_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Knowledge is scattered across many sources. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Knowledge is scattered across many sources"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Navigation can operate over a unified source and does not entail fragmentation.", "slug": "navigation"}], "normalized_requirement": "Knowledge is distributed across many independent sources without a shared orientation layer.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Knowledge is distributed across many independent sources without a shared orientation layer.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact relation is directed reliance with a condition, relied-on element, and failure mode.", "role_mapping": "Domain dependency -> dependent and prerequisite; real consequence -> failure mode.", "slug": "dependency", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b037_a03_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The domain has real dependencies. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The domain has real dependencies"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Dependency", "one_liner": "Directed relation in which one element relies on another being present, prior, compatible, or supplied, with a specifiable failure mode if the condition is unmet.", "page_ref": "prime:dependency", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Domain dependency -> dependent and prerequisite; real consequence -> failure mode.", "slug": "dependency", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact relation is directed reliance with a condition, relied-on element, and failure mode."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Domain elements have directed prerequisite or reliance relations with identifiable failure modes.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P070-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve successful item-level retrieval rather than general search failure.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A search process successfully returns individual items from a domain.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail missing domain-level orientation; merely returning poorly ranked items is insufficient.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The returned items do not provide an orienting relation to the broader domain.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Search returns individual domain items but does not provide domain-level orientation.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Item retrieval succeeds while domain orientation remains unavailable.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P070-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Navigation is the positive route-finding and traversal relation; item retrieval without orientation is its absence.", "slug": "navigation"}], "residual_id": "r:knowledge_map_navigation:b037_a03_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b037_a03_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Search returns items but not orientation. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Search returns items but not orientation"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Navigation is the positive route-finding and traversal relation; item retrieval without orientation is its absence.", "slug": "navigation"}], "normalized_requirement": "Search returns individual items but not orientation, route, prerequisite order, or position in the domain.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Search returns individual items but not orientation, route, prerequisite order, or position in the domain.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P070-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must concern a present domain map rather than absence of any representation.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A representation of the domain actually exists.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail missing action-guiding navigation, not merely incomplete description.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The map fails to enable a user to traverse the domain or select an actionable next step.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "An existing domain map does not support actionable traversal or next-step choice.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An existing domain map does not enable actionable navigation.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P070-C04-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A navigable structure does support traversal; a non-actionable map is the inverse capability state.", "slug": "navigation"}], "residual_id": "r:knowledge_map_navigation:b037_a03_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b037_a03_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A domain map exists but is not actionable. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A domain map exists but is not actionable"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_SYNTHESIS", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Without the qualifier, orientation loss can occur at a mode switch or handoff where no domain map exists.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Orientation Loss", "one_liner": "Diagnose why a competent user gets lost by checking three location facts — where am I, what can I move to, how did I arrive — at each transition seam, reading the orientation state off the count of missing facts regardless of substrate.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:orientation_loss", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "existing_domain_map_carrier", "predicate": "The impaired orientation-cue carrier is an existing domain map.", "rationale": "The qualifier binds one candidate-anchored contingent fact, supplies every remaining guardable obligation, introduces no principal role or unrelated relation, and survives a complete-instance counterexample attempt."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "orientation_loss"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The impaired orientation-cue carrier is an existing domain map."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "orientation_loss", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P070-C04-U1", "why_it_fits": "SSD: The DSA supplies the navigation-failure spine; one domain-binding fact restricts its cue carrier to a domain map. The qualifier binds one candidate-anchored contingent fact, supplies every remaining guardable obligation, introduces no principal role or unrelated relation, and survives a complete-instance counterexample attempt."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A domain map exists but does not support actionable traversal or next-step choice.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Different audiences enter with different goals.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Different audiences enter with different goals. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Different audiences enter with different goals"]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Different audiences enter with different goals"}, {"display_text": "Knowledge gaps matter.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Knowledge gaps matter. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Knowledge gaps matter"]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Knowledge gaps matter"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 37, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-037", "ledger_sha256": "859a7568072d93bdeb3981bd17279e1107b1f42fb0bdb7c9ee9ecd0be83bcdd4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Knowledge Threshold Crossing Communication", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:knowledge_threshold_crossing_communication", "slug": "knowledge_threshold_crossing_communication"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 3 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A learner begins with high confidence because task complexity, expert tacit knowledge, edge cases, and evaluation standards are invisible. As those hidden dimensions become visible, confidence falls. If the system does not explain this non-monotonic confidence trajectory, the learner may misread the threshold crossing as personal failure, may hide uncertainty, may abandon the domain, or may retreat into defensive overconfidence.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A learner begins with high confidence because task complexity, expert tacit knowledge, edge cases, and evaluation standards are invisible. As those hidden dimensions become visible, confidence falls. If the system does not explain this non-monotonic confidence trajectory, the learner may misread the threshold crossing as personal failure, may hide uncertainty, may abandon the domain, or may retreat into defensive overconfidence."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact miscalibration concentrates overestimation among low-competence agents whose skill deficit also impairs self-assessment.", "role_mapping": "Shallow skill -> low competence; excess confidence -> ĉ greater than c; low awareness -> metacognitive bottleneck.", "slug": "dunning_kruger_effect", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b037_a04_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Early success or shallow exposure has produced confidence that exceeds actual skill or diagnostic awareness. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Early success or shallow exposure has produced confidence that exceeds actual skill or diagnostic awareness."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Dunning-Kruger Effect", "one_liner": "The miscalibration in which the skills needed to judge one's own competence are the same skills one lacks, so the least competent most overestimate their ability.", "page_ref": "prime:dunning_kruger_effect", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Shallow skill -> low competence; excess confidence -> ĉ greater than c; low awareness -> metacognitive bottleneck.", "slug": "dunning_kruger_effect", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact miscalibration concentrates overestimation among low-competence agents whose skill deficit also impairs self-assessment."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Low or shallow competence produces self-assessed confidence substantially above actual skill and diagnostic awareness.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P070-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require second-order ignorance rather than merely incomplete knowledge that is already recognized.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Before the transition, the learner is unaware of relevant gaps in their knowledge.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the before-to-after learning transition rather than static low competence.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A learning transition occurs between the unawareness state and the recognition state.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail recognition of multiple specific deficits rather than one isolated correction.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "After the transition, the learner recognizes many concrete knowledge gaps.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve transition-to-recognition direction rather than a confidence change caused by unrelated failure.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The learning transition reveals gaps that were previously outside awareness.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "A predictable learning transition converts unrecognized ignorance into awareness of many concrete knowledge gaps.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Learning predictably reveals many previously unrecognized knowledge gaps.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P070-C05-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The effect describes competence-confidence miscalibration but does not require a staged transition that exposes a catalog of gaps.", "slug": "dunning_kruger_effect"}], "residual_id": "r:knowledge_threshold_crossing_communication:b037_a04_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b037_a04_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A predictable transition exists from not knowing what one does not know to recognizing many concrete knowledge gaps. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A predictable transition exists from not knowing what one does not know to recognizing many concrete knowledge gaps."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The effect describes competence-confidence miscalibration but does not require a staged transition that exposes a catalog of gaps.", "slug": "dunning_kruger_effect"}], "normalized_requirement": "A predictable learning transition reveals many concrete gaps that were previously outside awareness.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A predictable learning transition reveals many concrete gaps that were previously outside awareness.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P070-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must include a confidence decline associated with learning rather than any adverse feeling.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A learner's confidence decreases during a learning transition.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require absence of timely explanatory framing before or at the confidence change.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The trajectory has not been explained to the learner by the transition point.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the source's likely interpretation, not weaken it to mere possibility or strengthen it to universal occurrence.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The learner is likely to interpret the lower confidence as evidence of failure.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the misinterpretation between epistemically improved calibration and actual performance failure.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The confidence decline is corrective awareness, not itself evidence that learning has failed.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Without an explanation by the transition point, learners are likely to interpret a corrective confidence decline as evidence of failure.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An unexplained corrective confidence decline is likely to be misread as failure.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P070-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The effect need not include training, a subsequent confidence drop, or the learner's interpretation of that drop.", "slug": "dunning_kruger_effect"}], "residual_id": "r:knowledge_threshold_crossing_communication:b037_a04_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b037_a04_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Learners are likely to interpret lower confidence as failure unless the learning trajectory is explained in advance or at the transition point. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Learners are likely to interpret lower confidence as failure unless the learning trajectory is explained in advance or at the transition point."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The effect need not include training, a subsequent confidence drop, or the learner's interpretation of that drop.", "slug": "dunning_kruger_effect"}], "normalized_requirement": "Learners are likely to interpret a corrective drop in confidence as evidence of failure.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Learners are likely to interpret a corrective drop in confidence as evidence of failure.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Learners are about to encounter expert comparison, difficult feedback, hidden complexity, or authentic performance conditions.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A learner begins with high confidence because task complexity, expert tacit knowledge, edge cases, and evaluation standards are invisible. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Learners are about to encounter expert comparison, difficult feedback, hidden complexity, or authentic performance conditions. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Learners are about to encounter expert comparison, difficult feedback, hidden complexity, or authentic performance conditions.", "A learner begins with high confidence because task complexity, expert tacit knowledge, edge cases, and evaluation standards are invisible."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "Learners are about to encounter expert comparison, difficult feedback, hidden complexity, or authentic performance conditions."}, {"display_text": "The institution wants humility and persistence without humiliating learners or normalizing incompetence.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: The institution wants humility and persistence without humiliating learners or normalizing incompetence. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The institution wants humility and persistence without humiliating learners or normalizing incompetence."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The institution wants humility and persistence without humiliating learners or normalizing incompetence."}, {"display_text": "Mentors, coaches, instructors, or supervisors can provide stage-specific feedback and next-step scaffolds.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: Mentors, coaches, instructors, or supervisors can provide stage-specific feedback and next-step scaffolds. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Mentors, coaches, instructors, or supervisors can provide stage-specific feedback and next-step scaffolds."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Mentors, coaches, instructors, or supervisors can provide stage-specific feedback and next-step scaffolds."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 37, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-037", "ledger_sha256": "859a7568072d93bdeb3981bd17279e1107b1f42fb0bdb7c9ee9ecd0be83bcdd4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Knowledge-Warrant Audit", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:knowledge_warrant_audit", "slug": "knowledge_warrant_audit"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 4, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 2, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 2, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 2 of 4 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A person or organization treats many beliefs as knowledge even though their evidential bases differ sharply. Directly observed facts, model outputs, expert testimony, hearsay, old experience, assumptions, and preferences are spoken with similar confidence. Because the warrant behind each belief is implicit, unsupported claims can drive action, well-supported claims can be underused, and new disconfirming evidence has no clear path for changing confidence.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A person or organization treats many beliefs as knowledge even though their evidential bases differ sharply. Directly observed facts, model outputs, expert testimony, hearsay, old experience, assumptions, and preferences are spoken with similar confidence. Because the warrant behind each belief is implicit, unsupported claims can drive action, well-supported claims can be underused, and new disconfirming evidence has no clear path for changing confidence."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An assumption can be explicit, singular, and low-impact; it does not entail this hidden dependency set.", "slug": "assumption"}], "residual_id": "r:knowledge_warrant_audit:b037_a05_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b037_a05_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A decision, diagnosis, strategy, or public claim depends on many unstated beliefs or assumptions. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A decision, diagnosis, strategy, or public claim depends on many unstated beliefs or assumptions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An assumption can be explicit, singular, and low-impact; it does not entail this hidden dependency set.", "slug": "assumption"}], "normalized_requirement": "A consequential decision or claim depends on many unstated beliefs or assumptions.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A consequential decision or claim depends on many unstated beliefs or assumptions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P070-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must include an asserted claim and strong expressed confidence.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A speaker presents a claim using confident language.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require unavailable or unarticulated evidentiary support, not merely uncertainty about presentation style.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The speaker cannot promptly articulate the evidence that warrants the claim.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Speakers express claims confidently but cannot promptly articulate the evidence that warrants them.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Confident claims lack a promptly articulable evidentiary warrant.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P070-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Epistemic humility calibrates confidence to warrant; unexplained certainty is its inverse.", "slug": "epistemic_humility"}], "residual_id": "r:knowledge_warrant_audit:b037_a05_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b037_a05_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: People use confident language but cannot quickly explain what evidence warrants the claim. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["People use confident language but cannot quickly explain what evidence warrants the claim."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Epistemic humility calibrates confidence to warrant; unexplained certainty is its inverse.", "slug": "epistemic_humility"}], "normalized_requirement": "Speakers use confident language but cannot explain the evidence that warrants the claim.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Speakers use confident language but cannot explain the evidence that warrants the claim.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P070-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must include a claim and the evidence or warrant from which it originated.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A belief or claim has an original evidentiary basis.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require substantial repetition rather than one unsupported assertion.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The same belief has been repeatedly transmitted or asserted.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must require repetition to have left the original evidence forgotten or no longer traceable.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Repeated transmission has left the original evidentiary basis forgotten.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must require repetition to have left the original evidence extant but no longer consulted.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Repeated transmission has left the original evidentiary basis no longer inspected.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Repeated transmission leaves a belief's original evidentiary basis either forgotten or no longer inspected.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Repeated belief transmission disconnects a claim from active use of its original evidence.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P070-C08-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Belief formation need not involve repetition or loss of original evidence.", "slug": "belief_formation"}], "residual_id": "r:knowledge_warrant_audit:b037_a05_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b037_a05_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The same belief has been repeated so often that its original basis is forgotten or no longer inspected. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The same belief has been repeated so often that its original basis is forgotten or no longer inspected."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A chain that keeps checking the primary source and preserves lineage is excluded by the definition.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Quote Laundering", "one_liner": "A provisional but accurate statement is cited across successive venues that each strip its caveats and scope, until it circulates as authoritative settled fact — a channel failure, not a false source, so it resists source correction and needs traceability instead.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:quote_laundering", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "quote_laundering"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "quote_laundering", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P070-C08-U1", "why_it_fits": "SSD: The exact record entails O1–O2–O4: repeated transmission preserves the claim while active inspection of its original basis is lost. Every complete exact-record instance necessarily satisfies at least one full DNF branch without a qualifier."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Repeated belief transmission has severed the claim from its original evidentiary basis.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Evidence fidelity decay is one possible source of staleness but does not entail mixed, indirect, or inferential support.", "slug": "evidence_fidelity_decay"}], "residual_id": "r:knowledge_warrant_audit:b037_a05_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b037_a05_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Evidence is mixed, stale, indirect, source-dependent, or partly inferential. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Evidence is mixed, stale, indirect, source-dependent, or partly inferential."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Evidence fidelity decay is one possible source of staleness but does not entail mixed, indirect, or inferential support.", "slug": "evidence_fidelity_decay"}], "normalized_requirement": "Evidence is mixed, stale, indirect, source-dependent, or partly inferential.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Evidence is mixed, stale, indirect, source-dependent, or partly inferential.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P070-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve prior adequacy rather than assume the warrant was always defective.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A claim has a warrant that was adequate in its prior setting.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must include a changed population, regime, incentive structure, or comparable context.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The claim or warrant is considered in a materially changed application setting.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve prospective possibility and change-to-warrant direction without requiring actual invalidation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The setting change may weaken the warrant's adequacy.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "A relevant setting change may weaken a warrant that was adequate in the prior setting.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A warrant may lose adequacy when its application setting changes.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P070-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact failure requires a load-bearing assumption actually to be violated with lost warrant; a possible weakening is not enough.", "slug": "model_assumption_failure"}], "residual_id": "r:knowledge_warrant_audit:b037_a05_c7", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b037_a05_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A new context, population, regime, or incentive environment may weaken previously adequate warrants. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A new context, population, regime, or incentive environment may weaken previously adequate warrants."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A demonstrated preservation rule would place the inference outside the fallacy.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Fallacy of Composition", "one_liner": "Infer that a predicate established for one or all parts must hold of the whole they form, without a warranted preservation rule across aggregation, interaction, scale, configuration, or shared constraints.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:fallacy_of_composition", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "fallacy_of_composition"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "fallacy_of_composition", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P070-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "SSD: Every instance applies a predicate established in one scope to a changed aggregate scope without warranted transfer. Every complete exact-record instance necessarily satisfies at least one full DNF branch without a qualifier."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A contraindication cannot preserve a favorable default indication and a condition-triggered risk-benefit sign reversal while leaving the treatment recommendation's warrant equally adequate in the conditioned setting.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Contraindication", "one_liner": "Flag the sparse patient conditions under which a normally-indicated treatment becomes inadvisable, by naming the specific context in which its risk-benefit balance flips sign.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:contraindication", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "contraindication"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "contraindication", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P070-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "SSD: SSD: this is the medical subtype of a previously warranted action recommendation losing adequacy under a materially changed application context; all three obligations are mandatory exact-record structure. Every complete exact-record instance necessarily satisfies at least one full DNF branch without a qualifier."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Without the qualifier, an internally valid claim may remain within its studied setting.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Internal validity", "one_liner": "The property of an empirical study that warrants its causal claim within its own sample and setting — whether the observed intervention-outcome association is genuinely produced by the intervention rather than by confounders, selection, or bias — established by ruling out a closed catalog of named threats.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:internal_validity", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2", "O3"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "causal_claim_applied_outside_local_setting", "predicate": "The locally warranted causal claim is applied in a materially changed population or setting.", "rationale": "The qualifier binds one candidate-anchored contingent fact, supplies every remaining guardable obligation, introduces no principal role or unrelated relation, and survives a complete-instance counterexample attempt."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "internal_validity"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The locally warranted causal claim is applied in a materially changed population or setting."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "internal_validity", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P070-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "SSD: The DSA supplies a locally bounded warrant; one domain restriction actualizes application outside that boundary. The qualifier binds one candidate-anchored contingent fact, supplies every remaining guardable obligation, introduces no principal role or unrelated relation, and survives a complete-instance counterexample attempt."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A new population, context, regime, or incentive environment may weaken a previously adequate warrant.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A group wants epistemic humility without collapsing into generic skepticism or indecision.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: A group wants epistemic humility without collapsing into generic skepticism or indecision. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A group wants epistemic humility without collapsing into generic skepticism or indecision."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "A group wants epistemic humility without collapsing into generic skepticism or indecision."}, {"display_text": "Beliefs are high-impact enough that unsupported certainty could cause harm, waste, or reputational damage.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Action requires relying on beliefs, but humility requires distinguishing justified reliance from unsupported certainty and knowing when each belief must be reopened. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Beliefs are high-impact enough that unsupported certainty could cause harm, waste, or reputational damage. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Beliefs are high-impact enough that unsupported certainty could cause harm, waste, or reputational damage.", "Action requires relying on beliefs, but humility requires distinguishing justified reliance from unsupported certainty and knowing when each belief must be reopened."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Beliefs are high-impact enough that unsupported certainty could cause harm, waste, or reputational damage."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 37, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-037", "ledger_sha256": "859a7568072d93bdeb3981bd17279e1107b1f42fb0bdb7c9ee9ecd0be83bcdd4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Lag Structure and Feedback Loop Identification", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:lag_structure_and_feedback_loop_identification", "slug": "lag_structure_and_feedback_loop_identification"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system is interpreted as if current outcomes are caused mainly by current inputs, even though present behavior depends on prior states, delayed feedback, cumulative exposure, or latent memory. Because the lag structure is not visible, analysts misread recurrence as noise, treat delayed effects as independent events, overcorrect before a response has arrived, or intervene after the recurrence has already been set in motion.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system is interpreted as if current outcomes are caused mainly by current inputs, even though present behavior depends on prior states, delayed feedback, cumulative exposure, or latent memory. Because the lag structure is not visible, analysts misread recurrence as noise, treat delayed effects as independent events, overcorrect before a response has arrived, or intervene after the recurrence has already been set in motion."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Present-state dependence on prior states and reappearance across time is the exact relation.", "role_mapping": "Current outcome -> state at t; earlier state -> lagged predecessor; repeated response -> recurrence.", "slug": "recurrence", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b037_a06_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Current outcomes repeatedly resemble or respond to earlier states, decisions, shocks, cues, or interventions. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Current outcomes repeatedly resemble or respond to earlier states, decisions, shocks, cues, or interventions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Recurrence", "one_liner": "The property by which a state, event, or value reappears across time or iterations because the present state depends on prior states, distinct from mere repetition by its measurable lag structure.", "page_ref": "prime:recurrence", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Current outcome -> state at t; earlier state -> lagged predecessor; repeated response -> recurrence.", "slug": "recurrence", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Present-state dependence on prior states and reappearance across time is the exact relation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Current outcomes repeatedly depend on or return in response to earlier states, decisions, shocks, cues, or interventions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Feedback can be effectively instantaneous and stabilizing; it does not entail a lag-induced pathology.", "slug": "feedback"}], "residual_id": "r:lag_structure_and_feedback_loop_identification:b037_a06_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b037_a06_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Feedback arrives after a delay, causing apparent overreaction, underreaction, oscillation, or policy resistance. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Feedback arrives after a delay, causing apparent overreaction, underreaction, oscillation, or policy resistance."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Feedback can be effectively instantaneous and stabilizing; it does not entail a lag-induced pathology.", "slug": "feedback"}], "normalized_requirement": "A feedback relation contains enough delay to produce overreaction, underreaction, oscillation, or policy resistance.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A feedback relation contains enough delay to produce overreaction, underreaction, oscillation, or policy resistance.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime explicitly requires measurable lag structure and identifying recurrence order.", "role_mapping": "Repeated pattern -> recurrence; unclear lag -> unknown order.", "slug": "recurrence", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b037_a06_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A time series, event log, behavior pattern, or incident record shows recurrence but the relevant lag length is unclear. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A time series, event log, behavior pattern, or incident record shows recurrence but the relevant lag length is unclear."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Recurrence", "one_liner": "The property by which a state, event, or value reappears across time or iterations because the present state depends on prior states, distinct from mere repetition by its measurable lag structure.", "page_ref": "prime:recurrence", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Repeated pattern -> recurrence; unclear lag -> unknown order.", "slug": "recurrence", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime explicitly requires measurable lag structure and identifying recurrence order."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A record shows recurrent state or event patterns whose operative lag length is not yet known.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A recurrence can already have an identified lag-generating mechanism and need not be under explanatory dispute.", "slug": "recurrence"}], "residual_id": "r:lag_structure_and_feedback_loop_identification:b037_a06_c4", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b037_a06_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Teams debate whether an observed pattern is a real recurrence, a seasonal pattern, a measurement lag, or a shared upstream driver. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Teams debate whether an observed pattern is a real recurrence, a seasonal pattern, a measurement lag, or a shared upstream driver."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A recurrence can already have an identified lag-generating mechanism and need not be under explanatory dispute.", "slug": "recurrence"}], "normalized_requirement": "Observed recurrence must be distinguished from seasonality, measurement delay, or a shared upstream cause.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Observed recurrence must be distinguished from seasonality, measurement delay, or a shared upstream cause.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P070-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must concern temporal memory affecting present behavior rather than simple contemporaneous causation.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Current system behavior is plausibly dependent on prior states, exposures, or events.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require multiple candidate horizons rather than one known lag parameter.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "At least two distinct memory horizons are plausible.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve structural uncertainty and not convert candidate horizons into confirmed simultaneous effects.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The horizons remain plausible alternatives rather than established actual mechanisms.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "At least two distinct memory horizons are plausible explanations of a system's current behavior.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Current behavior has multiple plausible memory horizons.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P070-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A recurrence relation can have one known lag and does not require competing memory horizons.", "slug": "recurrence"}], "residual_id": "r:lag_structure_and_feedback_loop_identification:b037_a06_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b037_a06_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A system has multiple plausible memory horizons: immediate carryover, medium-term accumulation, long-tail persistence, or reset after a triggering event. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A system has multiple plausible memory horizons: immediate carryover, medium-term accumulation, long-tail persistence, or reset after a triggering event."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A recurrence relation can have one known lag and does not require competing memory horizons.", "slug": "recurrence"}], "normalized_requirement": "Several immediate, medium, long-tail, or event-reset memory horizons are plausible.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Several immediate, medium, long-tail, or event-reset memory horizons are plausible.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Prediction, control, reinforcement, or prevention depends on acting before the delayed consequence becomes visible.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Immediate action and simple explanation favor current-state reasoning, but recurring systems often operate through delayed history, accumulated memory, and feedback paths that only become visible across time. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: Prediction, control, reinforcement, or prevention depends on acting before the delayed consequence becomes visible. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Prediction, control, reinforcement, or prevention depends on acting before the delayed consequence becomes visible.", "Immediate action and simple explanation favor current-state reasoning, but recurring systems often operate through delayed history, accumulated memory, and feedback paths that only become visible across time."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Prediction, control, reinforcement, or prevention depends on acting before the delayed consequence becomes visible."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 37, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-037", "ledger_sha256": "859a7568072d93bdeb3981bd17279e1107b1f42fb0bdb7c9ee9ecd0be83bcdd4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Landscape-Aware Search Strategy Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:landscape_aware_search_strategy_design", "slug": "landscape_aware_search_strategy_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 3, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 2, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 2 of 3 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system tries to improve, optimize, decide, design, or learn within a space whose options differ in value, but it treats the space as if all regions can be searched with the same strategy.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system tries to improve, optimize, decide, design, or learn within a space whose options differ in value, but it treats the space as if all regions can be searched with the same strategy."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact point is best among neighbors while a superior global point may lie in another basin.", "role_mapping": "Stalled improvement -> all-neighbors-no-better halt; better elsewhere -> global gap.", "slug": "local_optimum", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b037_a07_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Improvement stalls even though better configurations plausibly exist elsewhere. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Improvement stalls even though better configurations plausibly exist elsewhere."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Local Optimum", "one_liner": "A point best within its neighborhood but not across the whole landscape.", "page_ref": "prime:local_optimum", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Stalled improvement -> all-neighbors-no-better halt; better elsewhere -> global gap.", "slug": "local_optimum", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact point is best among neighbors while a superior global point may lie in another basin."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Local improvement stalls at a configuration even though a better configuration exists outside its neighborhood.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P070-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must concern traversal or improvement within a space from a defined start.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A search or optimization process begins from an initial configuration.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must support variation in initial position rather than one fixed trajectory.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "More than one starting position is possible for the search.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve start-to-endpoint direction and a material quality effect.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Starting position strongly affects the quality of the final configuration reached.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "A search's starting position strongly affects the quality of its final configuration.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Search endpoint quality is strongly dependent on starting position.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P070-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A convex landscape can have start-independent convergence to one global optimum; start sensitivity is not universal.", "slug": "optimization_landscape"}], "residual_id": "r:landscape_aware_search_strategy_design:b037_a07_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b037_a07_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Starting position strongly affects the quality of the final solution. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Starting position strongly affects the quality of the final solution."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Removing start dependence would allow the superior method to be compared regardless of which method was first cued, contradicting the exact retrieval-blocking mechanism.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Einstellung Effect", "one_liner": "Diagnose a skilled solver's failure on a near-surface variant not as missing knowledge but as retrieval-driven blocking — the first-cued familiar method is retrieved, judged adequate, and halts search before a simpler dominating alternative is ever compared.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:einstellung_effect", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "einstellung_effect"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "einstellung_effect", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P070-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "SSD: SSD: Einstellung is a bounded cognitive-search subtype in which initial method activation strongly worsens endpoint quality relative to another possible starting route. Every complete exact-record instance necessarily satisfies at least one full DNF branch without a qualifier."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "If conventional and neutral encodings led equally to the permitted use, the defining block would be absent.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Functional Fixedness", "one_liner": "The cognitive bias in which encoding an object under its conventional category label crowds out inspection of its raw physical properties, blocking the solver from a non-conventional use the problem needs and the object's properties would permit.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:functional_fixedness", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "functional_fixedness"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "functional_fixedness", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P070-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "SSD: Final solution quality changes strongly with starting representation while capability and affordance remain fixed. Every complete exact-record instance necessarily satisfies at least one full DNF branch without a qualifier."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Starting position strongly changes the quality of the configuration reached by search.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Local competence halts where no neighbor improves, and escape requires a jump, restart, or temporarily worse move.", "role_mapping": "Local useful changes -> neighborhood search; trap or plateau -> local halt; nonlocal escape -> basin exit.", "slug": "local_optimum", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b037_a07_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Local changes appear useful but may lead into dead ends, traps, cliffs, or plateaus. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Local changes appear useful but may lead into dead ends, traps, cliffs, or plateaus."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Local Optimum", "one_liner": "A point best within its neighborhood but not across the whole landscape.", "page_ref": "prime:local_optimum", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Local useful changes -> neighborhood search; trap or plateau -> local halt; nonlocal escape -> basin exit.", "slug": "local_optimum", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Local competence halts where no neighbor improves, and escape requires a jump, restart, or temporarily worse move."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Neighborhood improvement can terminate in a trap or plateau while superior configurations require a non-local move.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact landscape requires one scalar value function over a neighborhood-defined configuration space; this condition has not resolved several objectives into that surface.", "slug": "optimization_landscape"}], "residual_id": "r:landscape_aware_search_strategy_design:b037_a07_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b037_a07_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Different objectives, constraints, or proxies create a nonuniform surface of value. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Different objectives, constraints, or proxies create a nonuniform surface of value."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact landscape requires one scalar value function over a neighborhood-defined configuration space; this condition has not resolved several objectives into that surface.", "slug": "optimization_landscape"}], "normalized_requirement": "Several objectives, constraints, or proxies induce a nonuniform but not yet unified surface of value.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Several objectives, constraints, or proxies induce a nonuniform but not yet unified surface of value.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Evaluation is expensive enough that search strategy choice matters.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system tries to improve, optimize, decide, design, or learn within a space whose options differ in value, but it treats the space as if all regions can be searched with the same strategy. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Evaluation is expensive enough that search strategy choice matters. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Evaluation is expensive enough that search strategy choice matters.", "A system tries to improve, optimize, decide, design, or learn within a space whose options differ in value, but it treats the space as if all regions can be searched with the same strategy."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Evaluation is expensive enough that search strategy choice matters."}, {"display_text": "A team must decide whether to exploit known promising regions, explore distant alternatives, prune branches, restart, or change representation.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system tries to improve, optimize, decide, design, or learn within a space whose options differ in value, but it treats the space as if all regions can be searched with the same strategy. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: A team must decide whether to exploit known promising regions, explore distant alternatives, prune branches, restart, or change representation. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A team must decide whether to exploit known promising regions, explore distant alternatives, prune branches, restart, or change representation.", "A system tries to improve, optimize, decide, design, or learn within a space whose options differ in value, but it treats the space as if all regions can be searched with the same strategy."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "A team must decide whether to exploit known promising regions, explore distant alternatives, prune branches, restart, or change representation."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 37, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-037", "ledger_sha256": "859a7568072d93bdeb3981bd17279e1107b1f42fb0bdb7c9ee9ecd0be83bcdd4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Latent-Affinity Pattern, Uniform Reveal", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:latent_affinity_pattern_uniform_reveal", "slug": "latent_affinity_pattern_uniform_reveal"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The process needs spatial differentiation and bulk efficiency at the same time. A\nuniform treatment has throughput but no spatial selectivity; pointwise final treatment\nhas selectivity but adds registration, handling, and scaling burden.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A process needs spatially selective final effects and bulk throughput, but uniform final treatment lacks selectivity while pointwise final treatment imposes prohibitive registration and handling burden."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "This branch preserves the complete remedy-free diagnostic route; goals, feasibility clauses, gates, deployment constraints, and supporting context remain outside the DNF."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "EXT001-C057", "dnf": [["EXT001-U057-O1"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"obligation_id": "EXT001-U057-O1", "predicate": "A final effect must vary spatially across a workpiece or population."}], "predicate": "A final effect must vary spatially across a workpiece or population.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A final effect must vary spatially across a workpiece or population.", "unit_id": "EXT001-U057"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"catalog_exhaustion": "CONDITION_LEVEL", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: A final effect must vary spatially across a workpiece or population.", "slug": "effect_size"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: A final effect must vary spatially across a workpiece or population.", "slug": "mixing"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: A final effect must vary spatially across a workpiece or population.", "slug": "funnel_analysis"}], "residual_id": "EXT001:latent_affinity_pattern_uniform_reveal:C01", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding."}}, "condition_id": "ext001_latent_affinity_pattern_uniform_reveal_a01", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: A final effect must vary spatially across a workpiece or population.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A final effect must vary spatially across a workpiece or population."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: A final effect must vary spatially across a workpiece or population.", "slug": "effect_size"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: A final effect must vary spatially across a workpiece or population.", "slug": "mixing"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: A final effect must vary spatially across a workpiece or population.", "slug": "funnel_analysis"}], "normalized_requirement": "A final effect must vary spatially across a workpiece or population.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A final effect must vary spatially across a workpiece or population.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "EXT001-C058", "dnf": [["EXT001-U058-O1"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"obligation_id": "EXT001-U058-O1", "predicate": "Uniform final treatment cannot supply the required spatial selectivity."}], "predicate": "Uniform final treatment cannot supply the required spatial selectivity.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Uniform final treatment cannot supply the required spatial selectivity.", "unit_id": "EXT001-U058"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"catalog_exhaustion": "CONDITION_LEVEL", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Uniform final treatment cannot supply the required spatial selectivity.", "slug": "schema_bounded_blind_spot"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Uniform final treatment cannot supply the required spatial selectivity.", "slug": "spinodal_decomposition"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Uniform final treatment cannot supply the required spatial selectivity.", "slug": "false_dilemma"}], "residual_id": "EXT001:latent_affinity_pattern_uniform_reveal:C02", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding."}}, "condition_id": "ext001_latent_affinity_pattern_uniform_reveal_a02", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: Uniform final treatment cannot supply the required spatial selectivity.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Uniform final treatment cannot supply the required spatial selectivity."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Uniform final treatment cannot supply the required spatial selectivity.", "slug": "schema_bounded_blind_spot"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Uniform final treatment cannot supply the required spatial selectivity.", "slug": "spinodal_decomposition"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Uniform final treatment cannot supply the required spatial selectivity.", "slug": "false_dilemma"}], "normalized_requirement": "Uniform final treatment cannot supply the required spatial selectivity.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Uniform final treatment cannot supply the required spatial selectivity.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "EXT001-C059", "dnf": [["EXT001-U059-O1"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"obligation_id": "EXT001-U059-O1", "predicate": "Pointwise final treatment would impose excessive registration, handling, or scaling burden."}], "predicate": "Pointwise final treatment would impose excessive registration, handling, or scaling burden.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Pointwise final treatment would impose excessive registration, handling, or scaling burden.", "unit_id": "EXT001-U059"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"catalog_exhaustion": "CONDITION_LEVEL", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Pointwise final treatment would impose excessive registration, handling, or scaling burden.", "slug": "proportionality"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Pointwise final treatment would impose excessive registration, handling, or scaling burden.", "slug": "negative_case_analysis"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Pointwise final treatment would impose excessive registration, handling, or scaling burden.", "slug": "leverage_points"}], "residual_id": "EXT001:latent_affinity_pattern_uniform_reveal:C03", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding."}}, "condition_id": "ext001_latent_affinity_pattern_uniform_reveal_a03", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: Pointwise final treatment would impose excessive registration, handling, or scaling burden.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Pointwise final treatment would impose excessive registration, handling, or scaling burden."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Pointwise final treatment would impose excessive registration, handling, or scaling burden.", "slug": "proportionality"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Pointwise final treatment would impose excessive registration, handling, or scaling burden.", "slug": "negative_case_analysis"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Pointwise final treatment would impose excessive registration, handling, or scaling burden.", "slug": "leverage_points"}], "normalized_requirement": "Pointwise final treatment would impose excessive registration, handling, or scaling burden.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Pointwise final treatment would impose excessive registration, handling, or scaling burden.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A stable latent response can be patterned before bulk reveal.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: A stable latent response can be patterned before bulk reveal. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A stable latent response can be patterned before bulk reveal.", "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "A stable latent response can be patterned before bulk reveal."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"candidate_ledger_sha256": "96f72d2139077fd57bf795048ebef33b3fd574b20963170080ec916b5b3b92fe", "extension_id": "new-archetypes-extension-001", "ledger_id": "prime-production-v1.2-extension-001", "ledger_sha256": "9644520614744632d1d36da44b1acd77ce432852c6083eb871203521c166efce"}, "base_projection_sha256": "841e0c7f3cb8e8054475ad29a8a14745a416b4fc115559a44878b94292e673ec", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "ca09ed9fe1598ce7072755b530de5553f5ee0a7cd64ae82d9e4a4e2149a37788", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Latent Affordance Surfacing", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:latent_affordance_surfacing", "slug": "latent_affordance_surfacing"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 3, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A capability, right, path, support channel, permission, control, or action possibility is genuinely available, but intended users form a false belief that it is unavailable because the surfaces they inspect provide no timely, interpretable signal of its existence.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A capability, right, path, support channel, permission, control, or action possibility is genuinely available, but intended users form a false belief that it is unavailable because the surfaces they inspect provide no timely, interpretable signal of its existence."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact relation is an action possibility arising only from the fit between agent capability and environment feature.", "role_mapping": "Users -> agents; permitted action -> action possibility; environment -> enabling feature.", "slug": "affordance", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b037_a08_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A real action possibility exists and is intended, permitted, or valuable for at least some users. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A real action possibility exists and is intended, permitted, or valuable for at least some users."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Affordance", "one_liner": "An action possibility offered by the fit between an agent and its environment.", "page_ref": "prime:affordance", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Users -> agents; permitted action -> action possibility; environment -> enabling feature.", "slug": "affordance", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact relation is an action possibility arising only from the fit between agent capability and environment feature."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "An agent-environment fit creates a real action possibility for at least some capable users.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P070-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require actual availability rather than a merely imagined or proposed option.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The option is genuinely available to be exercised.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail recurrent non-use rather than one isolated omission.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Users repeatedly fail to exercise the option.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must place repeated non-use in the presence of user need.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The users have a need for the option.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must place repeated non-use in the presence of eligibility.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The users are eligible to exercise the option.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must place repeated non-use in the presence of an actionable opportunity.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The users have an opportunity to exercise the option.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Users repeatedly fail to exercise a genuinely available option despite need, eligibility, or opportunity.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An available option remains repeatedly unused despite a relevant enabling condition.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P070-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An affordance may be perceived and exercised; existence does not entail repeated non-use.", "slug": "affordance"}], "residual_id": "r:latent_affordance_surfacing:b037_a08_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b037_a08_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Users repeatedly fail to use the option despite having need, eligibility, or opportunity. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Users repeatedly fail to use the option despite having need, eligibility, or opportunity."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_SYNTHESIS", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A user who repeatedly traverses the relevant flow while no sampled surface announces the working feature never forms the intention, so the available option remains repeatedly unexercised despite opportunity.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Discoverability Failure", "one_liner": "Diagnose why a working feature goes unused: the capability exists and functions perfectly, but no signal on any surface the user samples announces it, so the user's option set is bounded by the visible interface and the feature is operationally nonexistent.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:discoverability_failure", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2", "O5"], "guard_type": "QUANTIFIER_BINDING", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "users_repeatedly_traverse_relevant_feature_flow", "predicate": "Intended users repeatedly traverse the relevant task flow where the feature could be exercised.", "rationale": "The qualifier binds one candidate-anchored contingent fact, supplies every remaining guardable obligation, introduces no principal role or unrelated relation, and survives a complete-instance counterexample attempt."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "discoverability_failure"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "Intended users repeatedly traverse the relevant task flow where the feature could be exercised."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "discoverability_failure", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P070-C12-U1", "why_it_fits": "SSD: SSD: the candidate directly supplies genuine availability and pre-attempt non-use; one recurring traversal fact completes the opportunity branch without adding a new role or mechanism. The qualifier binds one candidate-anchored contingent fact, supplies every remaining guardable obligation, introduces no principal role or unrelated relation, and survives a complete-instance counterexample attempt."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A canonical fixedness episode may occur once.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Functional Fixedness", "one_liner": "The cognitive bias in which encoding an object under its conventional category label crowds out inspection of its raw physical properties, blocking the solver from a non-conventional use the problem needs and the object's properties would permit.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:functional_fixedness", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2"], "guard_type": "QUANTIFIER_BINDING", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "fixedness_recurs_across_attempts", "predicate": "The same fixed representation blocks the available affordance across multiple attempts.", "rationale": "The qualifier binds one candidate-anchored contingent fact, supplies every remaining guardable obligation, introduces no principal role or unrelated relation, and survives a complete-instance counterexample attempt."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "functional_fixedness"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The same fixed representation blocks the available affordance across multiple attempts."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "functional_fixedness", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P070-C12-U1", "why_it_fits": "SSD: Availability, need, and non-use are direct; one recurrence qualifier supplies the quantifier. The qualifier binds one candidate-anchored contingent fact, supplies every remaining guardable obligation, introduces no principal role or unrelated relation, and survives a complete-instance counterexample attempt."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "One acute fixation episode can produce only a single failure.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Problem-Solving Fixation", "one_liner": "A familiar representation of a problem, method, or object becomes the first and dominant retrieval path, suppressing alternatives that the solver could otherwise use and producing an avoidable failure that can be relieved by disrupting the representation rather than adding knowledge.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:problem_solving_fixation", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2"], "guard_type": "QUANTIFIER_BINDING", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "fixation_recurs_across_opportunities", "predicate": "The same fixation recurs across multiple opportunities to use the available alternative.", "rationale": "The qualifier binds one candidate-anchored contingent fact, supplies every remaining guardable obligation, introduces no principal role or unrelated relation, and survives a complete-instance counterexample attempt."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "problem_solving_fixation"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The same fixation recurs across multiple opportunities to use the available alternative."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "problem_solving_fixation", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P070-C12-U1", "why_it_fits": "SSD: The DSA supplies an available needed alternative and non-use; one recurrence qualifier completes the unit. The qualifier binds one candidate-anchored contingent fact, supplies every remaining guardable obligation, introduces no principal role or unrelated relation, and survives a complete-instance counterexample attempt."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Eligible users repeatedly fail to perceive or exercise an available action possibility.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P070-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must concern discoverability of an existing option rather than creation of a new one.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An action option or capability is genuinely available.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require exclusive or effectively exclusive placement, not merely supplemental documentation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Information that reveals the option is confined to a remote, hidden, or specialized channel.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must connect the visibility location to the users' actual information-sampling pattern.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Intended users do not ordinarily sample that revealing channel.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "An available option is signaled only through remote, hidden, or normally unsampled channels.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An option's visibility is confined to channels intended users do not sample.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P070-C13-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Affordances can be immediately perceptible in the local environment; hidden placement is not universal.", "slug": "affordance"}], "residual_id": "r:latent_affordance_surfacing:b037_a08_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b037_a08_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The option is only visible in documentation, expert knowledge, internal process, hidden menus, physical locations, policy pages, or channels users do not sample. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The option is only visible in documentation, expert knowledge, internal process, hidden menus, physical locations, policy pages, or channels users do not sample."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "With a revealing signal confined to an unsampled specialized surface, the option is available and visible only outside the intended user's ordinary sampling path; no counterexample preserves all terms.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Discoverability Failure", "one_liner": "Diagnose why a working feature goes unused: the capability exists and functions perfectly, but no signal on any surface the user samples announces it, so the user's option set is bounded by the visible interface and the feature is operationally nonexistent.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:discoverability_failure", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "capability_signal_only_on_unsampled_specialized_surface", "predicate": "A signal revealing the capability exists only on a specialized surface outside intended users' sampling path.", "rationale": "The qualifier binds one candidate-anchored contingent fact, supplies every remaining guardable obligation, introduces no principal role or unrelated relation, and survives a complete-instance counterexample attempt."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "discoverability_failure"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "A signal revealing the capability exists only on a specialized surface outside intended users' sampling path."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "discoverability_failure", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P070-C13-U1", "why_it_fits": "SSD: SSD: the candidate supplies the supported-versus-discovered split and sampling polarity; one atomic location qualifier converts total sampled-surface absence into remote-channel confinement. The qualifier binds one candidate-anchored contingent fact, supplies every remaining guardable obligation, introduces no principal role or unrelated relation, and survives a complete-instance counterexample attempt."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The option is visible only in remote documentation, expert knowledge, hidden menus, locations, or unsampled channels.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P070-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve actual availability so that the local negative signal is false.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The option or action path is genuinely available.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must include the locally inspected interface, setting, or process surface that conveys the signal.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The user encounters a local environment or action surface relevant to taking the option.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail a false absence signal.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The local environment falsely signals that the option is absent.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail a false impossibility signal.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The local environment falsely signals that the action is impossible.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail a false authorization signal.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The local environment falsely signals that the user lacks permission.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail a false dead-end signal.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The local environment falsely signals that no next step exists.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Although an action is available, the user's local environment signals that it is absent, impossible, unauthorized, or lacks a next step.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A local action surface falsely signals that an available action cannot be taken.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P070-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A signifier can accurately communicate an available action; this atom requires a misleading absence signal.", "slug": "signifier"}], "residual_id": "r:latent_affordance_surfacing:b037_a08_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b037_a08_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The user’s local environment implies absence, impossibility, lack of permission, or no next step. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The user’s local environment implies absence, impossibility, lack of permission, or no next step."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "If a concrete state-changing action exists while the empty view provides no next action or indication, the local surface falsely presents the user with no next step.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Empty-State Failure", "one_liner": "The interface condition in which a view has no content and provides no scaffolding for the absence — no explanation of the cause, no disambiguation among the possible causes (new, filtered, permission, loading, error), and no next action — so the user, left to infer meaning from nothing, typically concludes wrongly that the system is broken or gated.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:empty_state_failure", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1", "O6"], "guard_type": "MODALITY_ACTUALIZATION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "empty_state_has_available_change_action", "predicate": "A concrete action that would change the empty state is genuinely available.", "rationale": "The qualifier binds one candidate-anchored contingent fact, supplies every remaining guardable obligation, introduces no principal role or unrelated relation, and survives a complete-instance counterexample attempt."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "empty_state_failure"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "A concrete action that would change the empty state is genuinely available."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "empty_state_failure", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P070-C14-U1", "why_it_fits": "SSD: SSD: the exact record supplies the unscaffolded local surface and missing next-step cue; one availability fact completes the source's no-next-step branch. The qualifier binds one candidate-anchored contingent fact, supplies every remaining guardable obligation, introduces no principal role or unrelated relation, and survives a complete-instance counterexample attempt."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A complete instance cannot leave the feature in the user's sampled-surface model: by definition no sampled signal announces it and it is operationally nonexistent for that user.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Discoverability Failure", "one_liner": "Diagnose why a working feature goes unused: the capability exists and functions perfectly, but no signal on any surface the user samples announces it, so the user's option set is bounded by the visible interface and the feature is operationally nonexistent.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:discoverability_failure", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "discoverability_failure"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "discoverability_failure", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P070-C14-U1", "why_it_fits": "SSD: SSD: the exact record is the absent-signal branch of a local surface falsely representing a genuinely available action as absent; the other three DNF branches are not used. Every complete exact-record instance necessarily satisfies at least one full DNF branch without a qualifier."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The user's local environment falsely implies absence, impossibility, lack of permission, or no next step.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Non-discovery causes abandonment, workaround formation, underuse, unfair denial, support burden, safety risk, or reduced autonomy.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Non-discovery causes abandonment, workaround formation, underuse, unfair denial, support burden, safety risk, or reduced autonomy. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Non-discovery causes abandonment, workaround formation, underuse, unfair denial, support burden, safety risk, or reduced autonomy."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Non-discovery causes abandonment, workaround formation, underuse, unfair denial, support burden, safety risk, or reduced autonomy."}, {"display_text": "The option can be signaled without creating unacceptable clutter, privacy leakage, manipulation, or misuse.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Useful surfacing increases autonomy and fit by making real options perceivable, but every added cue competes for scarce attention and can create clutter, false promises, manipulation, or unsafe overexposure. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: The option can be signaled without creating unacceptable clutter, privacy leakage, manipulation, or misuse. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The option can be signaled without creating unacceptable clutter, privacy leakage, manipulation, or misuse.", "Useful surfacing increases autonomy and fit by making real options perceivable, but every added cue competes for scarce attention and can create clutter, false promises, manipulation, or unsafe overexposure."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The option can be signaled without creating unacceptable clutter, privacy leakage, manipulation, or misuse."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 37, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-037", "ledger_sha256": "859a7568072d93bdeb3981bd17279e1107b1f42fb0bdb7c9ee9ecd0be83bcdd4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Latent Capacity Release Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:latent_capacity_release_design", "slug": "latent_capacity_release_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 3 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A regulator, throttle, rule, context, or dependency actively suppresses system behavior, so the observed baseline understates intrinsic capacity and also hides the rebound and externality risks of release.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A regulator, throttle, rule, context, or dependency actively suppresses system behavior, so the observed baseline understates intrinsic capacity and also hides the rebound and externality risks of release."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Shortcut learning has a specific training-correlate failure and does not entail a recurring cross-domain target condition.", "slug": "shortcut_learning"}], "residual_id": "r:latent_capacity_release_design:b037_a09_c1", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b037_a09_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The target condition recurs across cases or domains rather than appearing as a one-off exception. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The target condition recurs across cases or domains rather than appearing as a one-off exception."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Shortcut learning has a specific training-correlate failure and does not entail a recurring cross-domain target condition.", "slug": "shortcut_learning"}], "normalized_requirement": "The target condition recurs across cases or domains rather than appearing once.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The target condition recurs across cases or domains rather than appearing once.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P070-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must include a relation reusable beyond the immediate case without requiring multiple manifestations already to be observed.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An underlying structural relation is general enough to apply beyond the immediate local manifestation.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must include locally scoped fixes rather than a direct structural intervention.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "One or more local workarounds are applied to individual manifestations.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the local-fix-to-manifestation relation and absence of structural abstraction.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The workarounds address local manifestations without representing the underlying relation.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail that local coping obscures the general structure, not merely that it leaves the structure unchanged.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The workarounds conceal rather than expose the reusable relation.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "A local workaround addresses its immediate manifestation while concealing an underlying structural relation reusable beyond it.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Local workarounds obscure a reusable underlying relation.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P070-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Constraint release removes a binding limit and does not require workarounds that hide an abstraction.", "slug": "constraint_release"}], "residual_id": "r:latent_capacity_release_design:b037_a09_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b037_a09_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Local workarounds do not expose the underlying structural relation. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Local workarounds do not expose the underlying structural relation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A comment that locally explains and masks an intact design relation which recurs beyond the fragment necessarily obscures a reusable underlying relation while handling only the manifestation.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Comments as Deodorant", "one_liner": "Read the need for an explanatory comment as a diagnostic signal, not a virtue — a clear paragraph explaining a confusing function masks a retirable design problem instead of fixing it, so do the rename or split that retires the comment rather than maintaining it.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:comments_as_deodorant", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "QUANTIFIER_BINDING", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "masked_design_problem_recurs_beyond_fragment", "predicate": "The masked design problem recurs as the same structural relation beyond the commented fragment.", "rationale": "The qualifier binds one candidate-anchored contingent fact, supplies every remaining guardable obligation, introduces no principal role or unrelated relation, and survives a complete-instance counterexample attempt."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "comments_as_deodorant"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The masked design problem recurs as the same structural relation beyond the commented fragment."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "comments_as_deodorant", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P070-C15-U1", "why_it_fits": "SSD: SSD: the exact record supplies workaround, local relief, intact structure, and concealment; one recurrence qualifier supplies the source's cross-manifestation generality. The qualifier binds one candidate-anchored contingent fact, supplies every remaining guardable obligation, introduces no principal role or unrelated relation, and survives a complete-instance counterexample attempt."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Local workarounds conceal rather than expose the reusable structural relation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An assumption can be explicit and validated, and need not carry consequential decision load.", "slug": "assumption"}], "residual_id": "r:latent_capacity_release_design:b037_a09_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b037_a09_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Consequential decisions depend on an assumption that is not yet explicit or validated. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Consequential decisions depend on an assumption that is not yet explicit or validated."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An assumption can be explicit and validated, and need not carry consequential decision load.", "slug": "assumption"}], "normalized_requirement": "A consequential decision relies on an assumption that remains implicit or unvalidated.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A consequential decision relies on an assumption that remains implicit or unvalidated.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The system needs a reusable intervention with monitoring, exception handling, and revision.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this deployment constraint: The system needs a reusable intervention with monitoring, exception handling, and revision. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The system needs a reusable intervention with monitoring, exception handling, and revision."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The system needs a reusable intervention with monitoring, exception handling, and revision."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 37, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-037", "ledger_sha256": "859a7568072d93bdeb3981bd17279e1107b1f42fb0bdb7c9ee9ecd0be83bcdd4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Latent Constraint Preservation Audit", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:latent_constraint_preservation_audit", "slug": "latent_constraint_preservation_audit"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A structure that appears obsolete, inefficient, arbitrary, ugly, bureaucratic, restrictive, redundant, or costly is targeted for removal. Current observers know the burden of the structure but not the historical constraints, failure cases, silent dependencies, edge users, coordination functions, safety margins, or memory traces that explain why it exists. Because the benefit of removal is visible and the hidden function is not, the system risks destroying a constraint-bearing artifact before learning what it was holding together.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A structure that appears obsolete, inefficient, arbitrary, ugly, bureaucratic, restrictive, redundant, or costly is targeted for removal. Current observers know the burden of the structure but not the historical constraints, failure cases, silent dependencies, edge users, coordination functions, safety margins, or memory traces that explain why it exists. Because the benefit of removal is visible and the hidden function is not, the system risks destroying a constraint-bearing artifact before learning what it was holding together."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact pattern begins with a persisting artifact and a would-be remover.", "role_mapping": "Long-standing structure -> persisting artifact; proposed removal -> removal decision.", "slug": "chestertons_fence", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b037_a10_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A long-standing rule, interface, barrier, ritual, data field, institution, process, safety margin, default, or dependency is proposed for removal, deprecation, relaxation, consolidation, or simplification. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A long-standing rule, interface, barrier, ritual, data field, institution, process, safety margin, default, or dependency is proposed for removal, deprecation, relaxation, consolidation, or simplification."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Chesterton's Fence", "one_liner": "The persistence of a structure is evidence that it encodes a constraint, so understand its function before removing it.", "page_ref": "prime:chestertons_fence", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Long-standing structure -> persisting artifact; proposed removal -> removal decision.", "slug": "chestertons_fence", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact pattern begins with a persisting artifact and a would-be remover."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A persistent rule, interface, barrier, ritual, field, institution, margin, default, or dependency is proposed for removal or relaxation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Persistence through a selection or correction regime is evidence of prior shaping pressure.", "role_mapping": "Cross-regime survival -> persistence and prior selection.", "slug": "chestertons_fence", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b037_a10_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The structure has persisted across time, owners, regimes, incidents, workarounds, or environmental changes. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The structure has persisted across time, owners, regimes, incidents, workarounds, or environmental changes."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Chesterton's Fence", "one_liner": "The persistence of a structure is evidence that it encodes a constraint, so understand its function before removing it.", "page_ref": "prime:chestertons_fence", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Cross-regime survival -> persistence and prior selection.", "slug": "chestertons_fence", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Persistence through a selection or correction regime is evidence of prior shaping pressure."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The structure has survived multiple owners, regimes, incidents, workarounds, or environmental changes.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The inference is triggered when a survivor's original constraint is not visible to the present observer.", "role_mapping": "Unknown rationale -> hidden encoded constraint; prevented failure -> shaping pressure.", "slug": "chestertons_fence", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b037_a10_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The current team cannot clearly state why the structure exists or what failure it prevents. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The current team cannot clearly state why the structure exists or what failure it prevents."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Chesterton's Fence", "one_liner": "The persistence of a structure is evidence that it encodes a constraint, so understand its function before removing it.", "page_ref": "prime:chestertons_fence", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Unknown rationale -> hidden encoded constraint; prevented failure -> shaping pressure.", "slug": "chestertons_fence", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The inference is triggered when a survivor's original constraint is not visible to the present observer."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Current decision-makers cannot state the structure's encoded constraint or prevented failure.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime requires some encoded constraint but not one of these particular domains or beneficiaries.", "slug": "chestertons_fence"}], "residual_id": "r:latent_constraint_preservation_audit:b037_a10_c5", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b037_a10_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The structure may affect low-visibility users, edge cases, legal constraints, safety margins, tacit coordination, minority signals, or archived memory. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The structure may affect low-visibility users, edge cases, legal constraints, safety margins, tacit coordination, minority signals, or archived memory."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime requires some encoded constraint but not one of these particular domains or beneficiaries.", "slug": "chestertons_fence"}], "normalized_requirement": "The structure may protect low-visibility users, edge cases, law, safety, tacit coordination, minority signals, or memory.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The structure may protect low-visibility users, edge cases, law, safety, tacit coordination, minority signals, or memory.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Removal-cost asymmetry—cheap temporary retention versus delayed or catastrophic wrong removal—is mandatory.", "role_mapping": "Irreversible removal -> wrong-removal cost; difficult observation -> delayed failure.", "slug": "chestertons_fence", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b037_a10_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The decision is at least partly irreversible, costly to reverse, or difficult to observe after removal. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The decision is at least partly irreversible, costly to reverse, or difficult to observe after removal."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Chesterton's Fence", "one_liner": "The persistence of a structure is evidence that it encodes a constraint, so understand its function before removing it.", "page_ref": "prime:chestertons_fence", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Irreversible removal -> wrong-removal cost; difficult observation -> delayed failure.", "slug": "chestertons_fence", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Removal-cost asymmetry—cheap temporary retention versus delayed or catastrophic wrong removal—is mandatory."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Wrong removal is costly, delayed, partly irreversible, or difficult to observe compared with temporary retention.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P071-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O8"], ["O1", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O3", "O7"], ["O1", "O3", "O8"], ["O1", "O4", "O6"], ["O1", "O4", "O7"], ["O1", "O4", "O8"], ["O1", "O5", "O6"], ["O1", "O5", "O7"], ["O1", "O5", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must concern evidence used to recover why an artifact or structure exists, not records in general.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The evidence is needed to reconstruct the purpose of an artifact or structure.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfies this record-form branch only when the relevant evidence consists of incident histories.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The purpose-reconstruction evidence is an incident history.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfies this record-form branch only when the relevant evidence consists of change logs.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The purpose-reconstruction evidence is a change log.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfies this record-form branch only when the relevant evidence consists of oral histories.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The purpose-reconstruction evidence is an oral history.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfies this record-form branch only when the relevant evidence consists of maintenance records.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The purpose-reconstruction evidence is a maintenance record.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfies this defect-state branch only if required portions of the named evidence are missing.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The named purpose-reconstruction record is incomplete.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfies this defect-state branch only if the named evidence is dispersed rather than coherently available.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The named purpose-reconstruction record is scattered.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfies this defect-state branch only if institutional memory no longer retains the named evidence or its meaning.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The named purpose-reconstruction record or its contents have been forgotten.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Incident histories, change logs, oral histories, or maintenance records needed to reconstruct purpose are incomplete, scattered, or forgotten.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A named purpose-reconstruction record form has a completeness or availability defect.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P071-C01-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime permits recovery through records and does not require those records themselves to be incomplete.", "slug": "chestertons_fence"}], "residual_id": "r:latent_constraint_preservation_audit:b037_a10_c7", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b037_a10_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Past incidents, change logs, oral histories, or maintenance records are incomplete, scattered, or forgotten. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Past incidents, change logs, oral histories, or maintenance records are incomplete, scattered, or forgotten."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime permits recovery through records and does not require those records themselves to be incomplete.", "slug": "chestertons_fence"}], "normalized_requirement": "Incident histories, change logs, oral histories, or maintenance records needed to reconstruct purpose are incomplete or forgotten.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Incident histories, change logs, oral histories, or maintenance records needed to reconstruct purpose are incomplete or forgotten.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Removal has visible benefits such as speed, cost reduction, elegance, freedom, simplification, usability, or political appeal.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Because the benefit of removal is visible and the hidden function is not, the system risks destroying a constraint-bearing artifact before learning what it was holding together. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Removal has visible benefits such as speed, cost reduction, elegance, freedom, simplification, usability, or political appeal. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Removal has visible benefits such as speed, cost reduction, elegance, freedom, simplification, usability, or political appeal.", "Because the benefit of removal is visible and the hidden function is not, the system risks destroying a constraint-bearing artifact before learning what it was holding together."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Removal has visible benefits such as speed, cost reduction, elegance, freedom, simplification, usability, or political appeal."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 37, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-037", "ledger_sha256": "859a7568072d93bdeb3981bd17279e1107b1f42fb0bdb7c9ee9ecd0be83bcdd4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Layer-Appropriate Capability Placement", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:layer_appropriate_capability_placement", "slug": "layer_appropriate_capability_placement"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A subsystem built on a richer host is asked to satisfy requirements that exceed the subsystem’s supported configuration and extension surface. Rather than exposing or using host capability, teams reconstruct host-like facilities inside the subsystem. The local facilities acquire policy, state, scheduling, storage, identity, packaging, observability, or governance responsibilities that the layer was not designed to own, producing an inferior nested platform and two competing sources of truth.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A subsystem built on a richer host is asked to satisfy requirements that exceed the subsystem’s supported configuration and extension surface. Rather than exposing or using host capability, teams reconstruct host-like facilities inside the subsystem. The local facilities acquire policy, state, scheduling, storage, identity, packaging, observability, or governance responsibilities that the layer was not designed to own, producing an inferior nested platform and two competing sources of truth."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P071-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must involve an embedded subsystem and its supported extension mechanism rather than an arbitrary implementation boundary.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An embedded layer exposes an officially supported customization or extension surface.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must identify a valid requirement, not an unsupported or merely hypothetical preference.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The layer faces a legitimate requirement.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require repeated applicability of the requirement rather than a one-off exception.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The legitimate requirement recurs.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail lack of expressive capacity in the supported surface for that requirement.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The supported customization surface cannot express the requirement.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "An embedded layer's supported customization surface cannot express a legitimate recurring requirement.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A supported extension surface lacks capacity for a recurring legitimate requirement.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P071-C02-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Embeddability is successful representation inside a host; inability to express the requirement is its failure state.", "slug": "embeddability"}], "residual_id": "r:layer_appropriate_capability_placement:b037_a11_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b037_a11_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The embedded layer’s supported customization surface cannot represent a legitimate recurring requirement. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The embedded layer’s supported customization surface cannot represent a legitimate recurring requirement."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Embeddability is successful representation inside a host; inability to express the requirement is its failure state.", "slug": "embeddability"}], "normalized_requirement": "An embedded layer's supported customization surface cannot express a legitimate recurring requirement.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "An embedded layer's supported customization surface cannot express a legitimate recurring requirement.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P071-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must concern a capability needed in the same layered system.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A capability is required by the relevant system or subsystem.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail a capability-strength comparison in the stronger-than-required direction.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The available version of the capability is stronger than the version required.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require prior or current availability rather than a capability planned only for the future.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The superior layer already owns or supplies the stronger capability at the relevant time.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfies this branch only when the capability owner is the subsystem's host.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The owner of the stronger capability is the host layer.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfies this branch only when the capability owner is a shared peer or adjacent service layer.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The owner of the stronger capability is an adjacent shared layer.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}], "predicate": "A host or adjacent shared layer already owns a stronger version of a required capability.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A superior layer already supplies a stronger form of a needed capability.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P071-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Layering does not require duplicate capability or a stronger host implementation.", "slug": "layering"}], "residual_id": "r:layer_appropriate_capability_placement:b037_a11_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b037_a11_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The host or an adjacent shared layer already owns a stronger version of the needed capability. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The host or an adjacent shared layer already owns a stronger version of the needed capability."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "I tried a host that lacked the capability or supplied only an equal or weaker form. That contradicts the exact record's existing broad host facilities and the accumulated lower-quality local copy, so the host branch remains necessary.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Inner-Platform Effect", "one_liner": "A system built on top of another tends to re-implement the host's facilities inside itself, badly, because the embedded sub-system's customisation surface is narrower than the host's while the requirements arriving at it are not bounded by that narrowness.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:inner_platform_effect", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "inner_platform_effect"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "inner_platform_effect", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P071-C03-U1", "why_it_fits": "SSD: the exact record universally preserves the mapped structural spine and necessarily satisfies complete DNF branch O1 + O2 + O3 + O4. The counterexample attempt fails without ceasing to be a complete inner_platform_effect instance; no qualifier is required."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A host or adjacent shared layer already owns a stronger version of the required capability.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P071-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must involve a capability owned by the host rather than a capability local to the consumer.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A host layer supplies a capability relevant to an embedded or dependent layer.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an officially supported discovery interface or path, without requiring a separately governed mechanism.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "An officially supported interface is the path for discovering the host capability.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail a discoverability barrier on the supported path.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The host capability is difficult to discover through that interface.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "A host capability is difficult to discover through supported interfaces.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A supported interface makes a host capability hard to discover.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P071-C04-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P071-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must involve a capability owned by the host rather than a capability local to the consumer.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A host layer supplies a capability relevant to an embedded or dependent layer.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an officially supported request or provisioning interface or path, without requiring a separately governed mechanism.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "An officially supported interface is the path for requesting the host capability.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail friction in obtaining or requesting the capability through the supported path.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The host capability is difficult to request through that interface.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "A host capability is difficult to request through supported interfaces.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A supported interface makes a host capability hard to request.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P071-C04-U2"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P071-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must involve a capability owned by the host rather than a capability local to the consumer.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A host layer supplies a capability relevant to an embedded or dependent layer.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an officially supported access interface or path, without requiring a separately governed mechanism.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "An officially supported interface is the path for accessing the host capability.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail a technical or operational access barrier on the supported path.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The host capability is difficult to access through that interface.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "A host capability is difficult to access through supported interfaces.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A supported interface makes a host capability hard to access.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P071-C04-U3"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P071-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must involve a capability owned by the host rather than a capability local to the consumer.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A host layer supplies a capability relevant to an embedded or dependent layer.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an officially supported customization or adaptation interface or path, without requiring a separately governed mechanism.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "An officially supported interface is the path for adapting the host capability.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail difficulty tailoring the capability through the supported path.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The host capability is difficult to adapt through that interface.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "A host capability is difficult to adapt through supported interfaces.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A supported interface makes a host capability hard to adapt.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P071-C04-U4"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Progressive disclosure can make a capability discoverable and does not entail an access or adaptation barrier.", "slug": "progressive_disclosure"}], "residual_id": "r:layer_appropriate_capability_placement:b037_a11_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b037_a11_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Rather than exposing or using host capability, teams reconstruct host-like facilities inside the subsystem. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The host capability is difficult to discover, request, access, or adapt through supported interfaces.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The host capability is difficult to discover, request, access, or adapt through supported interfaces.", "Rather than exposing or using host capability, teams reconstruct host-like facilities inside the subsystem."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 4, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 4}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Progressive disclosure can make a capability discoverable and does not entail an access or adaptation barrier.", "slug": "progressive_disclosure"}], "normalized_requirement": "The host capability is difficult to discover, request, access, or adapt through supported interfaces.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 4 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The host capability is difficult to discover, request, access, or adapt through supported interfaces.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The subsystem relies asymmetrically on specific host services and would fail if their conditions were unmet.", "role_mapping": "Subsystem -> dependent element; host services -> relied-on elements; operation -> dependency condition.", "slug": "dependency", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b037_a11_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The subsystem is treated as an independent platform even though it depends on host identity, storage, scheduling, security, or lifecycle. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The subsystem is treated as an independent platform even though it depends on host identity, storage, scheduling, security, or lifecycle."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Dependency", "one_liner": "Directed relation in which one element relies on another being present, prior, compatible, or supplied, with a specifiable failure mode if the condition is unmet.", "page_ref": "prime:dependency", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Subsystem -> dependent element; host services -> relied-on elements; operation -> dependency condition.", "slug": "dependency", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The subsystem relies asymmetrically on specific host services and would fail if their conditions were unmet."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A nominal subsystem depends directionally on host identity, storage, scheduling, security, or lifecycle services.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P071-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must concern local extension or exception channels, not arbitrary host components.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A local extension mechanism carries exceptions around or beyond the embedded layer's ordinary supported behavior.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail the capacity to acquire state without requiring that accumulation has already occurred.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The local extension mechanism can accumulate its own state.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail the capacity to acquire policy without requiring that accumulation has already occurred.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The local extension mechanism can accumulate its own policy.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve independence or a separate source of truth rather than ordinary delegated host state.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The accumulated state and policy are independent of the host or shared layer's authoritative state and policy.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Exception-bearing local extensions can accumulate independent state and policy.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Local exception mechanisms can become independent state-and-policy loci.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P071-C05-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Defense in depth composes protective layers and does not entail shadow policy in local extensions.", "slug": "defense_in_depth"}], "residual_id": "r:layer_appropriate_capability_placement:b037_a11_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b037_a11_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Exceptions arrive through scripts, plugins, configuration, macros, sidecars, or local services that can accumulate state and policy. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Exceptions arrive through scripts, plugins, configuration, macros, sidecars, or local services that can accumulate state and policy."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Defense in depth composes protective layers and does not entail shadow policy in local extensions.", "slug": "defense_in_depth"}], "normalized_requirement": "Scripts, plugins, macros, sidecars, or local services accumulate independent state and policy.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Scripts, plugins, macros, sidecars, or local services accumulate independent state and policy.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Local teams can add code or policy faster than the host can add governed extension points.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Preserving the narrow layer without an honest delegation or extension path pushes essential complexity inward, while exposing the full host can undermine isolation, portability, local autonomy, and abstraction integrity. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Local teams can add code or policy faster than the host can add governed extension points. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Local teams can add code or policy faster than the host can add governed extension points.", "Preserving the narrow layer without an honest delegation or extension path pushes essential complexity inward, while exposing the full host can undermine isolation, portability, local autonomy, and abstraction integrity."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Local teams can add code or policy faster than the host can add governed extension points."}, {"display_text": "Portability, isolation, or autonomy goals are asserted but have not been separated from convenience or organizational delay.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Preserving the narrow layer without an honest delegation or extension path pushes essential complexity inward, while exposing the full host can undermine isolation, portability, local autonomy, and abstraction integrity. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: Portability, isolation, or autonomy goals are asserted but have not been separated from convenience or organizational delay. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Portability, isolation, or autonomy goals are asserted but have not been separated from convenience or organizational delay.", "Preserving the narrow layer without an honest delegation or extension path pushes essential complexity inward, while exposing the full host can undermine isolation, portability, local autonomy, and abstraction integrity."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "Portability, isolation, or autonomy goals are asserted but have not been separated from convenience or organizational delay."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 37, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-037", "ledger_sha256": "859a7568072d93bdeb3981bd17279e1107b1f42fb0bdb7c9ee9ecd0be83bcdd4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Layer Decay and Expiration Management", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:layer_decay_and_expiration_management", "slug": "layer_decay_and_expiration_management"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Sequential deposits keep accumulating after their active usefulness, validity, or safe-retention window has changed. Because the system lacks explicit age, retention, expiry, archival, and dependency rules, old layers remain active by default, consume resources, confuse search and decision-making, create legal or safety exposure, or get deleted without preserving auditability and reconstruction paths.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Sequential deposits keep accumulating after their active usefulness, validity, or safe-retention window has changed. Because the system lacks explicit age, retention, expiry, archival, and dependency rules, old layers remain active by default, consume resources, confuse search and decision-making, create legal or safety exposure, or get deleted without preserving auditability and reconstruction paths."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Sequential deposition that leaves prior layers in place produces a time-indexed stack.", "role_mapping": "Artifacts over time -> sequential deposition; retained layers -> preserved stack.", "slug": "layered_accumulation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b037_a12_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A system stores, records, caches, deposits, or layers artifacts over time faster than it retires them. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A system stores, records, caches, deposits, or layers artifacts over time faster than it retires them."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Layered Accumulation", "one_liner": "Sequential time-ordered deposition in which each new layer rests atop the prior ones, so the position of a layer encodes when it formed and the stack becomes a readable record of history.", "page_ref": "prime:layered_accumulation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Artifacts over time -> sequential deposition; retained layers -> preserved stack.", "slug": "layered_accumulation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Sequential deposition that leaves prior layers in place produces a time-indexed stack."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Time-ordered artifact layers accumulate faster than they are retired.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact trajectory is systematic functional loss over operational time toward a threshold.", "role_mapping": "Older layers -> elapsed exposure; reduced reliability or value -> degradation.", "slug": "temporal_decay_and_degradation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b037_a12_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Older layers differ in current value, reliability, access need, compliance status, or reconstruction value. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Older layers differ in current value, reliability, access need, compliance status, or reconstruction value."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Temporal Decay and Degradation", "one_liner": "System properties or capabilities systematically diminish over time.", "page_ref": "prime:temporal_decay_and_degradation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Older layers -> elapsed exposure; reduced reliability or value -> degradation.", "slug": "temporal_decay_and_degradation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact trajectory is systematic functional loss over operational time toward a threshold."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Older artifacts systematically lose current capability, reliability, or validity through time and exposure.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Small per-cycle retention costs accumulating into an integral loss are the defining invariant.", "role_mapping": "Every retained layer -> unclear-purpose element; carrying burden -> integral retention cost.", "slug": "retention_under_removal_uncertainty", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b037_a12_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Keeping every layer active is costly, confusing, risky, slow, or operationally impossible. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Keeping every layer active is costly, confusing, risky, slow, or operationally impossible."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Retention Under Removal Uncertainty", "one_liner": "A durable system accumulates obsolete-but-not-removable elements because each removal decision faces an asymmetric cost that loses individually and wins only in the integral.", "page_ref": "prime:retention_under_removal_uncertainty", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Every retained layer -> unclear-purpose element; carrying burden -> integral retention cost.", "slug": "retention_under_removal_uncertainty", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Small per-cycle retention costs accumulating into an integral loss are the defining invariant."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Retaining every unclear-purpose layer imposes small recurring costs that aggregate into material search, risk, and maintenance burden.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Wrong-removal risk under uncertain continued reliance is a mandatory part of the local retention calculus.", "role_mapping": "Old layer -> unclear-purpose element; broken rollback or audit -> wrong-removal downside.", "slug": "retention_under_removal_uncertainty", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b037_a12_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Removing old layers can break rollback, audit, lineage, recovery, or historical interpretation. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Removing old layers can break rollback, audit, lineage, recovery, or historical interpretation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Retention Under Removal Uncertainty", "one_liner": "A durable system accumulates obsolete-but-not-removable elements because each removal decision faces an asymmetric cost that loses individually and wins only in the integral.", "page_ref": "prime:retention_under_removal_uncertainty", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Old layer -> unclear-purpose element; broken rollback or audit -> wrong-removal downside.", "slug": "retention_under_removal_uncertainty", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Wrong-removal risk under uncertain continued reliance is a mandatory part of the local retention calculus."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Removing an apparently old layer risks breaking rollback, audit, lineage, recovery, or historical interpretation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P071-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require that the exposed information has passed its period of currency or validity.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An information layer is stale relative to the current time or state.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail continued discoverability or exposure after staleness.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The stale layer remains discoverable to consumers.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the possibility of mistaken currentness without requiring that the mistake has already occurred.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Consumers may mistake the stale layer for a current or valid source.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfies this branch only if the false-current target is treated as factual truth.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The stale layer may be mistaken for current truth.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfies this branch only if the false-current target is treated as operative guidance.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The stale layer may be mistaken for current guidance.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfies this branch only if the stale layer is treated as representing presently valid system state.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The stale layer may be mistaken for a valid state.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}], "predicate": "A stale layer remains discoverable and may be mistaken for current truth, guidance, or valid state.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A discoverable stale layer can be mistaken for current authority or validity.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P071-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Degradation need not leave an artifact discoverable or cause consumers to mistake it for current truth.", "slug": "temporal_decay_and_degradation"}], "residual_id": "r:layer_decay_and_expiration_management:b037_a12_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b037_a12_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Stale layers remain discoverable and may be mistaken for current truth, guidance, or valid state. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Stale layers remain discoverable and may be mistaken for current truth, guidance, or valid state."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "I tried a drifted label withdrawn from use or openly treated as nonauthoritative. That contradicts the exact record's continued scoring against a reference treated as fixed and authoritative, so the stale-currentness counterexample is not complete.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Gold-Standard Erosion", "one_liner": "Recognize that a model scored against a mutable reference label can show stable metrics while its real validity silently degrades, because the answer key — not the model — has drifted away from the construct it once operationalized.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:gold_standard_erosion", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "gold_standard_erosion"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "gold_standard_erosion", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P071-C06-U1", "why_it_fits": "SSD: the exact record universally preserves the mapped structural spine and necessarily satisfies complete DNF branch O1 + O2 + O3 + O6. The counterexample attempt fails without ceasing to be a complete gold_standard_erosion instance; no qualifier is required."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "I tried an eroded control whose documentation was retired or whose loss of effect was recognized. That removes the exact nominal-versus-actual assurance failure, which requires the documented and audited artifact still to certify protection.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Hazard-Control Decay", "one_liner": "Track the widening gap between what a safety control's paperwork says it does and what it actually does under hazard, so that a control certified sound by audit can be found silently unprotective before it fails.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:hazard_control_decay", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "hazard_control_decay"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "hazard_control_decay", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P071-C06-U1", "why_it_fits": "SSD: the exact record universally preserves the mapped structural spine and necessarily satisfies complete DNF branch O1 + O2 + O3 + O6. The counterexample attempt fails without ceasing to be a complete hazard_control_decay instance; no qualifier is required."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "I tried a changed label whose semantic change was prominently flagged to consumers. That defeats the exact failure mode, whose measurement apparatus appears constant and does not flag the change while dashboards continue to publish validity signals.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Ground-Truth Drift", "one_liner": "The model-evaluation failure in which the operational definition of the correct answer drifts on a clock the monitoring apparatus cannot see, so metrics keep scoring against a moved target while the dashboards stay green — invisible because every detector consumes current ground truth as its reference.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:ground_truth_drift", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "ground_truth_drift"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "ground_truth_drift", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P071-C06-U1", "why_it_fits": "SSD: the exact record universally preserves the mapped structural spine and necessarily satisfies complete DNF branch O1 + O2 + O3 + O4. The counterexample attempt fails without ceasing to be a complete ground_truth_drift instance; no qualifier is required."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "I tried a historical state retained only for scholarship and not used as a target. That is not the exact pathology, which makes the nonviable historical reference the operative restoration guidance.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Restoration Baseline Error", "one_liner": "Diagnose a restoration that targets a historical reference state no longer viable under shifted conditions — the error of treating the prior state as a fixed property of the place rather than a function of contemporaneous conditions that have themselves moved.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:restoration_baseline_error", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "restoration_baseline_error"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "restoration_baseline_error", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P071-C06-U1", "why_it_fits": "SSD: the exact record universally preserves the mapped structural spine and necessarily satisfies complete DNF branch O1 + O2 + O3 + O5. The counterexample attempt fails without ceasing to be a complete restoration_baseline_error instance; no qualifier is required."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Stale layers remain discoverable and are mistaken for current truth or valid state.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Retention obligations, legal holds, safety requirements, or historical value require exceptions to ordinary cleanup.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Because the system lacks explicit age, retention, expiry, archival, and dependency rules, old layers remain active by default, consume resources, confuse search and decision-making, create legal or safety exposure, or get deleted without preserving auditability and reconstruction paths. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: Retention obligations, legal holds, safety requirements, or historical value require exceptions to ordinary cleanup. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Retention obligations, legal holds, safety requirements, or historical value require exceptions to ordinary cleanup.", "Because the system lacks explicit age, retention, expiry, archival, and dependency rules, old layers remain active by default, consume resources, confuse search and decision-making, create legal or safety exposure, or get deleted without preserving auditability and reconstruction paths."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Retention obligations, legal holds, safety requirements, or historical value require exceptions to ordinary cleanup."}, {"display_text": "Capacity pressure, search degradation, maintenance burden, or policy sprawl forces lifecycle decisions.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Because the system lacks explicit age, retention, expiry, archival, and dependency rules, old layers remain active by default, consume resources, confuse search and decision-making, create legal or safety exposure, or get deleted without preserving auditability and reconstruction paths. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Capacity pressure, search degradation, maintenance burden, or policy sprawl forces lifecycle decisions. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Capacity pressure, search degradation, maintenance burden, or policy sprawl forces lifecycle decisions.", "Because the system lacks explicit age, retention, expiry, archival, and dependency rules, old layers remain active by default, consume resources, confuse search and decision-making, create legal or safety exposure, or get deleted without preserving auditability and reconstruction paths."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "Capacity pressure, search degradation, maintenance burden, or policy sprawl forces lifecycle decisions."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 37, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-037", "ledger_sha256": "859a7568072d93bdeb3981bd17279e1107b1f42fb0bdb7c9ee9ecd0be83bcdd4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Layered Abstraction", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:layered_abstraction", "slug": "layered_abstraction"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 4, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 3, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 3, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 3 of 4 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is mixed-level entanglement. Low-level implementation, mid-level coordination, high-level purpose, and user-facing representation are all exposed to one another without disciplined boundaries. As a result, every change becomes cross-cutting, every user must understand too much, and every component becomes vulnerable to details that should have stayed local.\n\nThe common symptom is not simply “complexity.” It is complexity caused by missing levels of abstraction. A user cannot operate a tool without knowing how it is wired. A policy cannot be applied without reinterpreting every operational detail. A software feature cannot change without editing storage, presentation, and infrastructure. A dashboard cannot support decisions because it either dumps raw data or hides too much meaning.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Actors or components must reason across too many levels of detail because low-level implementation, mid-level coordination, and high-level purpose are not separated by stable abstraction boundaries."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P071-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must identify a higher-level task or reasoning process rather than undifferentiated work.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Work is being performed at a higher level of abstraction.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the lower-to-higher level direction and implementation-detail role.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Low-level implementation details intrude into that work.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail disruption or interruption rather than mere visibility of lower-level details.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The low-level details interrupt the higher-level work.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require recurrent interruption rather than a single exceptional incident.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The interruption occurs repeatedly.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}], "predicate": "Higher-level work is repeatedly interrupted by low-level implementation details.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Low-level details repeatedly intrude on higher-level work.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P071-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A functioning layered design hides lower-level detail; intrusion is its inverse.", "slug": "layering"}], "residual_id": "r:layered_abstraction:b037_a13_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b037_a13_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The archetype is especially useful when high-level work is being interrupted by low-level implementation detail, when changes at one level ripple through unrelated parts of the system, or when different audiences need different views of the same underlying reality. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Higher-level work is repeatedly interrupted by low-level implementation details.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Higher-level work is repeatedly interrupted by low-level implementation details.", "The archetype is especially useful when high-level work is being interrupted by low-level implementation detail, when changes at one level ripple through unrelated parts of the system, or when different audiences need different views of the same underlying reality."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "I tried a complete instance with no repeated low-level intrusion into sequential intent. Removing repeated callback nesting removes the pyramid whose depth grows with the chain and therefore removes callback hell itself.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Callback Hell", "one_liner": "The readability collapse that results when a sequential chain of asynchronous steps is written as nested continuation callbacks, so indentation depth grows with step count and the code's textual shape inverts the computation's temporal order.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:callback_hell", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "callback_hell"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "callback_hell", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P071-C07-U1", "why_it_fits": "SSD: the exact record universally preserves the mapped structural spine and necessarily satisfies complete DNF branch O1 + O2 + O3 + O4. The counterexample attempt fails without ceasing to be a complete callback_hell instance; no qualifier is required."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Higher-level work is repeatedly interrupted by low-level implementation details.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P071-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must identify a level-local initiating change in a system with multiple levels.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A change originates at one level of a layered system.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail cross-level propagation rather than effects confined to the changed level.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Effects of the change propagate beyond the originating level.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve system-wide reach rather than impact limited to one adjacent level.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The propagation extends through the whole system.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail inability to predict the cross-level effects, not merely broad but known propagation.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The propagation is unpredictable.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "A change at one level propagates unpredictably through the whole system.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A level-local change has unpredictable system-wide propagation.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P071-C08-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Layering can confine change behind stable interfaces and does not entail unpredictable propagation.", "slug": "layering"}], "residual_id": "r:layered_abstraction:b037_a13_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b037_a13_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The archetype is especially useful when high-level work is being interrupted by low-level implementation detail, when changes at one level ripple through unrelated parts of the system, or when different audiences need different views of the same underlying reality. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Changes at one level propagate unpredictably through the whole system.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Changes at one level propagate unpredictably through the whole system.", "The archetype is especially useful when high-level work is being interrupted by low-level implementation detail, when changes at one level ripple through unrelated parts of the system, or when different audiences need different views of the same underlying reality."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "I preserved spaghetti code and the declared-layer guard while trying to contain the edit locally. The exact record says no unit can be modified without tracking effects across the whole and that pulling one strand drags an unpredictable mass, so containment is impossible.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Spaghetti Code", "one_liner": "Diagnose a codebase as unmaintainable by reading its dependency graph: when boundary-violating edges accumulate past a threshold, the cost of any local change scales with the whole system rather than the unit being changed.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:spaghetti_code", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "changed_unit_occupies_declared_layer", "predicate": "The locally changed code unit occupies one declared layer of a layered system.", "rationale": "Publication safety passes: the exact candidate and qualifier, if present, necessarily satisfy one complete DNF branch under the subtype-preserving mapping."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "spaghetti_code"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The locally changed code unit occupies one declared layer of a layered system."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "spaghetti_code", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P071-C08-U1", "why_it_fits": "SSD: the exact record supplies the structural spine and, with the single atomic guard, necessarily satisfies complete DNF branch O1 + O2 + O3 + O4. The qualifier only binds an existing candidate role or quantifier, fills every remaining branch gap, and neither restates the head nor introduces another mechanism."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Changes at one level propagate unpredictably through the whole system.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P071-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must concern allocation of responsibility and decision authority, not merely data or component placement.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Responsibilities and their associated decision authority exist in a multi-level system.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail cross-level mixing or unclear assignment, not a deliberate clean allocation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Those responsibilities and decisions are mixed rather than coherently separated across levels.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfies this branch only when the relevant levels are levels of abstraction or description.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The mixing occurs across levels of description.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfies this branch only when the relevant levels are implementation layers.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The mixing occurs across levels of implementation.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Responsibilities and associated decisions are mixed across levels of description or implementation.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Responsibilities and decision authority lack coherent separation across levels.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P071-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A layer assigns coherent responsibilities and need not mix them across levels.", "slug": "layering"}], "residual_id": "r:layered_abstraction:b037_a13_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b037_a13_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Responsibilities are mixed across levels. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Responsibilities are mixed across levels."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A layer assigns coherent responsibilities and need not mix them across levels.", "slug": "layering"}], "normalized_requirement": "Responsibilities and decisions are mixed across levels of description or implementation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Responsibilities and decisions are mixed across levels of description or implementation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P071-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must concern a layered system with an intermediary contract that can be bypassed.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A system has multiple levels separated by intermediate contracts or interfaces.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail contract-bypassing cross-level access rather than ordinary adjacent access through the contract.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A direct access path crosses levels while bypassing an intermediate contract.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve bypass-to-brittleness causal direction rather than merely co-occurring coupling.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The bypass causes changes to become brittle across the coupled levels.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Direct cross-level access bypasses intermediate contracts and makes change brittle.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Contract-bypassing cross-level access causes brittle change coupling.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P071-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Layering restricts cross-level access through interfaces; bypass is its inverse.", "slug": "layering"}], "residual_id": "r:layered_abstraction:b037_a13_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b037_a13_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Direct cross-level access makes the system brittle. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Direct cross-level access makes the system brittle."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_GUARDED_EQUIVALENT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "I preserved the typed cross-level boundary violation while trying to keep the change uncoupled. The exact record makes the boundary-violating edge force nonlocal whole-system reasoning, so the supposedly nonbrittle instance is not complete.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Spaghetti Code", "one_liner": "Diagnose a codebase as unmaintainable by reading its dependency graph: when boundary-violating edges accumulate past a threshold, the cost of any local change scales with the whole system rather than the unit being changed.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:spaghetti_code", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1", "O2"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "violated_boundary_is_intermediate_level_interface", "predicate": "The violated module boundary is an intermediate interface separating two levels of the system.", "rationale": "Publication safety passes: the exact candidate and qualifier, if present, necessarily satisfy one complete DNF branch under the subtype-preserving mapping."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "spaghetti_code"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The violated module boundary is an intermediate interface separating two levels of the system."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "spaghetti_code", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P071-C10-U1", "why_it_fits": "SSD: the exact record supplies the structural spine and, with the single atomic guard, necessarily satisfies complete DNF branch O1 + O2 + O3. The qualifier only binds an existing candidate role or quantifier, fills every remaining branch gap, and neither restates the head nor introduces another mechanism."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Direct cross-level access bypasses intermediate contracts and makes change brittle.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "DISJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Different participants need different views of the same system.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The archetype is especially useful when high-level work is being interrupted by low-level implementation detail, when changes at one level ripple through unrelated parts of the system, or when different audiences need different views of the same underlying reality. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Different participants need different views of the same system. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Different participants need different views of the same system.", "The archetype is especially useful when high-level work is being interrupted by low-level implementation detail, when changes at one level ripple through unrelated parts of the system, or when different audiences need different views of the same underlying reality."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Different participants need different views of the same system."}, {"display_text": "The system needs reuse or substitution beneath a stable surface.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: The system needs reuse or substitution beneath a stable surface. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The system needs reuse or substitution beneath a stable surface."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The system needs reuse or substitution beneath a stable surface."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 37, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-037", "ledger_sha256": "859a7568072d93bdeb3981bd17279e1107b1f42fb0bdb7c9ee9ecd0be83bcdd4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Layered Barrier Defense Architecture", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:layered_barrier_defense_architecture", "slug": "layered_barrier_defense_architecture"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A protected asset, function, population, or boundary is exposed through a small number of decisive failure points. The system appears protected because at least one control exists, but total loss can still occur when that control is bypassed, misconfigured, unavailable, socially overridden, or defeated by a common dependency shared across safeguards.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A protected asset, function, population, or boundary is exposed through a small number of decisive failure points. The system appears protected because at least one control exists, but total loss can still occur when that control is bypassed, misconfigured, unavailable, socially overridden, or defeated by a common dependency shared across safeguards."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P071-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must include a protected target rather than an unprotected resource or generic system component.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An asset or critical function is intended to be protected.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require single-event sufficiency rather than a conjunction of independent failures.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "One adverse event or action is sufficient for the exposure pathway.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve possibility or vulnerability without requiring that exposure has occurred.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The single adverse event can expose the protected target.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail a direct path to the target rather than only a remote increase in risk.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Exposure of the protected target is direct after the single event.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "One adverse event can directly expose a protected asset or critical function.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A single adverse event can defeat the effective protection path to a protected target.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P071-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Defense in depth is specifically arranged so one defeated layer does not directly expose the asset.", "slug": "defense_in_depth"}], "residual_id": "r:layered_barrier_defense_architecture:b037_a14_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b037_a14_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A single breach, fault, mistake, policy exception, or adversarial action could expose a protected asset or critical function. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A single breach, fault, mistake, policy exception, or adversarial action could expose a protected asset or critical function."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "I tried a sharp-end act that did not expose the target, but then it did not complete the hazard path aligned through the layered defenses and was not the exact record's active failure.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Active Failure", "one_liner": "The frontline operator's act at the sharp end that completes a hazard path by aligning with holes latent conditions had pre-positioned in a system's layered defenses — the proximate, visible half of Reason's Swiss cheese model.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:active_failure", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "active_failure"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "active_failure", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P071-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "SSD: the exact record universally preserves the mapped structural spine and necessarily satisfies complete DNF branch O1 + O2 + O3 + O4. The counterexample attempt fails without ceasing to be a complete active_failure instance; no qualifier is required."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "I tried an event above the named withstand threshold that remained inside guaranteed protection. That contradicts the exact standard's boundary, which explicitly frames above-threshold events as accepted residual unprotection.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Protection Standard", "one_liner": "Declare the named threshold up to which a system is designed to withstand a hazard class — which simultaneously frames every event above it as accepted residual risk, converting implicit unprotection into governed unprotection that can be audited, insured, and contested.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:protection_standard", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "protection_standard"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "protection_standard", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P071-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "SSD: the exact record universally preserves the mapped structural spine and necessarily satisfies complete DNF branch O1 + O2 + O3 + O4. The counterexample attempt fails without ceasing to be a complete protection_standard instance; no qualifier is required."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "I tried a single breach that left the source-protection promise intact. The exact record explicitly says one breach collapses that promise across present and future sources, so the counterexample fails.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Source Protection", "one_liner": "The layered practice by which a journalist shields a vulnerable upstream provider's identity from any party who would harm them — protecting not just the present source but the future channel, since a single breach collapses the protection promise across every source not yet contacted.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:source_protection", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "source_protection"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "source_protection", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P071-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "SSD: the exact record universally preserves the mapped structural spine and necessarily satisfies complete DNF branch O1 + O2 + O3 + O4. The counterexample attempt fails without ceasing to be a complete source_protection instance; no qualifier is required."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "I tried untrusted data that crossed into the control channel but did not expose control. If the downstream interpreter does not execute it as command, query, or instruction, the exact injection weakness is absent.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Injection Weakness", "one_liner": "The software-security failure in which untrusted data crosses into a control channel and a downstream interpreter executes it as command, query, or instruction — a collapse of the data/control boundary that a legitimate, often credential-free, input channel is enough to exploit.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:injection_weakness", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "injection_weakness"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "injection_weakness", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P071-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "SSD: the exact record universally preserves the mapped structural spine and necessarily satisfies complete DNF branch O1 + O2 + O3 + O4. The counterexample attempt fails without ceasing to be a complete injection_weakness instance; no qualifier is required."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "I tried a realized disruption for which every effective margin still protected the operation. That removes the exact illusion at realization; the record requires the reported buffer to be useless when the disruption arrives.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Safety-Stock Illusion", "one_liner": "Recognize that a buffer reported as adequate protection can be useless when disruption arrives, because effective protection is the weakest of five margins — size, location, composition, accessibility, and fit to the realised disruption — not the reported size alone.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:safety_stock_illusion", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "safety_stock_illusion"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "safety_stock_illusion", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P071-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "SSD: the exact record universally preserves the mapped structural spine and necessarily satisfies complete DNF branch O1 + O2 + O3 + O4. The counterexample attempt fails without ceasing to be a complete safety_stock_illusion instance; no qualifier is required."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "I tried a stress event in which the hedge remained coupled to the exposure. That is outside the exact basis-risk failure, which is the proxy's decoupling and protection evaporation under stress.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Basis-Risk Failure", "one_liner": "Diagnose why a hedge collapses at the worst moment: the proxy instrument, chosen for its calm-market correlation with the exposure, decouples under stress, so protection that passed every ex-ante metric evaporates exactly when it is needed.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:basis_risk_failure", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "basis_risk_failure"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "basis_risk_failure", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P071-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "SSD: the exact record universally preserves the mapped structural spine and necessarily satisfies complete DNF branch O1 + O2 + O3 + O4. The counterexample attempt fails without ceasing to be a complete basis_risk_failure instance; no qualifier is required."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "I tried an embedded directive that remained inert data. Without interpretation as an instruction executing at model privilege, the exact prompt-injection failure does not exist.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Prompt Injection", "one_liner": "Untrusted content delivered to a language model through a data channel is interpreted as instructions rather than material to process, so an embedded directive executes at the model's privilege — the failure being the absence of any in-band boundary between instructions and data, not a lapse in alignment.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:prompt_injection", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "prompt_injection"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "prompt_injection", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P071-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "SSD: the exact record universally preserves the mapped structural spine and necessarily satisfies complete DNF branch O1 + O2 + O3 + O4. The counterexample attempt fails without ceasing to be a complete prompt_injection instance; no qualifier is required."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "I tried a request naming a protected attribute that the binder refused. That contradicts the exact no-allow-list vulnerability, which writes all client-supplied fields directly to the object.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Mass Assignment", "one_liner": "The web-application vulnerability in which a request-binding layer writes all client-supplied fields directly to a domain object with no allow-list, letting a caller set server-managed attributes like role or owner_id simply by naming them.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:mass_assignment", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "mass_assignment"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "mass_assignment", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P071-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "SSD: the exact record universally preserves the mapped structural spine and necessarily satisfies complete DNF branch O1 + O2 + O3 + O4. The counterexample attempt fails without ceasing to be a complete mass_assignment instance; no qualifier is required."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "I preserved the exact extraction record and the one-prompt guard while trying to keep private content unexposed. The record requires emission through the inference interface, and the guard binds that emission to one crafted prompt, so the attempt contradicts both.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Data Extraction Through Prompting", "one_liner": "The AI-security failure mode in which an adversary crafts inputs that make a deployed language model emit private content — training text, system prompts, retrieved documents — by exploiting the legitimate inference interface, whose breadth exceeds the access-control envelope around the data.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:data_extraction_through_prompting", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2"], "guard_type": "QUANTIFIER_BINDING", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "one_prompt_emits_protected_content", "predicate": "One crafted prompt directly emits the protected content.", "rationale": "Publication safety passes: the exact candidate and qualifier, if present, necessarily satisfy one complete DNF branch under the subtype-preserving mapping."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "data_extraction_through_prompting"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "One crafted prompt directly emits the protected content."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "data_extraction_through_prompting", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P071-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "SSD: the exact record supplies the structural spine and, with the single atomic guard, necessarily satisfies complete DNF branch O1 + O2 + O3 + O4. The qualifier only binds an existing candidate role or quantifier, fills every remaining branch gap, and neither restates the head nor introduces another mechanism."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "I tried a crafted malicious input that remained on the benign side but did not defeat the classifier. Preserving both the malicious payload and benign classification is already the direct protection failure named by the exact record.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Evasion Attack", "one_liner": "Craft inputs that fall on the benign side of a deployed classifier's learned decision boundary while preserving their malicious payload — exploiting the gap between the boundary and the true concept it was meant to represent, so near-perfect test accuracy coexists with near-zero robustness under attack.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:evasion_attack", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "evasion_attack"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "evasion_attack", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P071-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "SSD: the exact record universally preserves the mapped structural spine and necessarily satisfies complete DNF branch O1 + O2 + O3 + O4. The counterexample attempt fails without ceasing to be a complete evasion_attack instance; no qualifier is required."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "One breach, fault, exception, or adversarial action can directly expose a protected asset.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The atom supplies a relational substrate, entry and protected endpoints, and an ordered adjacency-honoring traversal with intermediate interception points.", "role_mapping": "Threat route -> ordered edge sequence; boundaries or stages -> waypoints; protected function -> endpoint.", "slug": "path", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b037_a14_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Threats can move through a path with identifiable stages, boundaries, carriers, credentials, channels, or escalation steps. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Threats can move through a path with identifiable stages, boundaries, carriers, credentials, channels, or escalation steps."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Path", "one_liner": "An ordered, traversable sequence of edges connecting one node to another through a relational structure.", "page_ref": "prime:path", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Threat route -> ordered edge sequence; boundaries or stages -> waypoints; protected function -> endpoint.", "slug": "path", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The atom supplies a relational substrate, entry and protected endpoints, and an ordered adjacency-honoring traversal with intermediate interception points."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A threat traverses an ordered sequence of stages, boundaries, carriers, credentials, channels, or escalations toward a protected endpoint.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P071-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must involve multiple existing safeguards rather than one control.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "At least two safeguards already exist for the protected target.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail same-kind protection across the safeguards rather than merely their coexistence.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The existing safeguards are homogeneous in protective type or mechanism.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Existing safeguards are homogeneous.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Multiple safeguards use the same kind of protection.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P071-C12-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P071-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must involve multiple existing safeguards rather than one control.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "At least two safeguards already exist for the protected target.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail sequential interdependence rather than independent parallel barriers.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The safeguards are arranged in a sequence in which one safeguard depends on another.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Existing safeguards are sequentially dependent.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Multiple safeguards form a dependency chain rather than independent barriers.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P071-C12-U2"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P071-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must involve multiple existing safeguards as the socially bypassable arrangement rather than one control.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "At least two safeguards already exist for the protected target.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail social bypassability, not only technical failure or physical defeat.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Actors can bypass or override the safeguards through social action.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "Existing safeguards are socially bypassable.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A safeguard arrangement can be bypassed through social action or override.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P071-C12-U3"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P071-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must involve multiple existing safeguards rather than one control.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "At least two safeguards already exist for the protected target.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must identify the same supporting dependency beneath multiple safeguards.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "One support or maintenance dependency is shared by the safeguards.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail safeguard reliance on the common dependency rather than incidental association.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The shared dependency maintains or enables the safeguards.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail susceptibility of the shared support to failure rather than a robust common foundation.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The shared dependency is fragile.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Existing safeguards share one fragile maintenance or support dependency.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Multiple safeguards depend on the same fragile support.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P071-C12-U4"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Independent and heterogeneous layers are the positive defense-in-depth structure; shared fragility is its inverse.", "slug": "defense_in_depth"}], "residual_id": "r:layered_barrier_defense_architecture:b037_a14_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b037_a14_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Existing safeguards are homogeneous, sequentially dependent, socially bypassable, or maintained by the same fragile dependency. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Existing safeguards are homogeneous, sequentially dependent, socially bypassable, or maintained by the same fragile dependency."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 4, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 4}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Independent and heterogeneous layers are the positive defense-in-depth structure; shared fragility is its inverse.", "slug": "defense_in_depth"}], "normalized_requirement": "Existing safeguards are homogeneous, sequentially dependent, socially bypassable, or share one fragile dependency.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 4 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Existing safeguards are homogeneous, sequentially dependent, socially bypassable, or share one fragile dependency.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The cost of total loss is high enough to justify multiple protective layers and ongoing maintenance burden.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Every protective layer adds cost, delay, complexity, and false confidence, but relying on one decisive layer converts protection into a single point of failure. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The cost of total loss is high enough to justify multiple protective layers and ongoing maintenance burden. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The cost of total loss is high enough to justify multiple protective layers and ongoing maintenance burden.", "Every protective layer adds cost, delay, complexity, and false confidence, but relying on one decisive layer converts protection into a single point of failure."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The cost of total loss is high enough to justify multiple protective layers and ongoing maintenance burden."}, {"display_text": "Operators need time to detect, delay, contain, recover, or escalate before damage becomes irreversible.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: Operators need time to detect, delay, contain, recover, or escalate before damage becomes irreversible. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Operators need time to detect, delay, contain, recover, or escalate before damage becomes irreversible."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Operators need time to detect, delay, contain, recover, or escalate before damage becomes irreversible."}, {"display_text": "A protective design must work even when one layer is stale, defeated, overloaded, misapplied, or unavailable.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Every protective layer adds cost, delay, complexity, and false confidence, but relying on one decisive layer converts protection into a single point of failure. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: A protective design must work even when one layer is stale, defeated, overloaded, misapplied, or unavailable. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A protective design must work even when one layer is stale, defeated, overloaded, misapplied, or unavailable.", "Every protective layer adds cost, delay, complexity, and false confidence, but relying on one decisive layer converts protection into a single point of failure."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "A protective design must work even when one layer is stale, defeated, overloaded, misapplied, or unavailable."}, {"display_text": "Hazards include human error, adversarial attack, physical intrusion, contamination, contagion, cascading failure, fraud, or operational degradation.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Hazards include human error, adversarial attack, physical intrusion, contamination, contagion, cascading failure, fraud, or operational degradation. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Hazards include human error, adversarial attack, physical intrusion, contamination, contagion, cascading failure, fraud, or operational degradation."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "Hazards include human error, adversarial attack, physical intrusion, contamination, contagion, cascading failure, fraud, or operational degradation."}, {"display_text": "Controls exist in different domains — physical, technical, procedural, legal, social, financial, or recovery — and need to be composed without assuming that any one layer is decisive.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Every protective layer adds cost, delay, complexity, and false confidence, but relying on one decisive layer converts protection into a single point of failure. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: Controls exist in different domains — physical, technical, procedural, legal, social, financial, or recovery — and need to be composed without assuming that any one layer is decisive. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Controls exist in different domains — physical, technical, procedural, legal, social, financial, or recovery — and need to be composed without assuming that any one layer is decisive.", "Every protective layer adds cost, delay, complexity, and false confidence, but relying on one decisive layer converts protection into a single point of failure."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 8, "text": "Controls exist in different domains — physical, technical, procedural, legal, social, financial, or recovery — and need to be composed without assuming that any one layer is decisive."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 37, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-037", "ledger_sha256": "859a7568072d93bdeb3981bd17279e1107b1f42fb0bdb7c9ee9ecd0be83bcdd4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Layered Coordination Oversight", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:layered_coordination_oversight", "slug": "layered_coordination_oversight"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 11, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 4, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 7, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 11 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 4 of 11 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 11}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The failure pattern combines mismatched authority, distorted information, overloaded review, and absent return. A lower tier waits for approval on work it understands; a higher tier receives summaries stripped of uncertainty and tail risk; a middle tier relays rather than judges; lateral dependencies detour through the vertical chain; and escalated authority becomes permanent because no reentry condition exists. Formal oversight grows while consequential blind spots remain. The result is delay, workarounds, capture, blame shifting, surveillance, metric gaming, contradictory mandates, and loss of local learning.\n\nThe root tension is local tiers hold contextual knowledge while wider tiers hold authority and consequence visibility; coordination must connect them without turning every interaction into centralized permission.\n\n- approval bottlenecks and delayed response\n- contradictory mandates and duplicated controls\n- local workarounds, shadow governance, and informal vetoes\n- hidden risk, distorted reports, and surprise failure\n- blame shifting across levels and accountability gaps\n- central overreach, local capture, or both\n- inequitable service and inconsistent rights protection\n- oversight theater that produces documents without judgment", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system has multiple organizational, jurisdictional, technical, geographic, professional, or temporal levels, but coordination and oversight do not match that structure. Decisions are centralized despite local knowledge, delegated without resources or limits, repeatedly approved at several levels, or escalated without a return path. Local signals are summarized until risk disappears; central priorities reach the edge as vague or conflicting mandates; lateral dependencies bypass the hierarchy; and no tier owns cross-level disagreement. Oversight expands beyond attention capacity, while consequential blind spots remain. Formal layers then create latency, shadow authority, blame shifting, metric gaming, and loss of accountability rather than coherent control."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P071-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve decision identity across tiers rather than a chain of distinct subordinate decisions.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The object processed at each tier is the same decision.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require processing of the same decision at three or more tiers rather than at only one or two tiers.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "At least three tiers process the same decision, which is the operational reading of several tiers.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail absence of new judgment or evaluative contribution at the repeated tiers.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The additional tiers add no judgment to the decision.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfies this branch only if the redundant action is renewed consideration of the decision.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The same decision is revisited at the several tiers.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate satisfies this branch only if the redundant action is repeated approval of the decision.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The same decision is reapproved at the several tiers.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "The same decision is revisited or reapproved at several tiers without added judgment.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Several tiers redundantly process the same decision without adding judgment.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P071-C13-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Coordination overhead can exceed work value without the same decision being redundantly reapproved across tiers.", "slug": "coordination_overhead_inversion"}], "residual_id": "r:layered_coordination_oversight:b037_a15_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b037_a15_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: the same decision is revisited or reapproved at several tiers without added judgment. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["the same decision is revisited or reapproved at several tiers without added judgment"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Coordination overhead can exceed work value without the same decision being redundantly reapproved across tiers.", "slug": "coordination_overhead_inversion"}], "normalized_requirement": "The same decision is reapproved at several tiers without additional judgment.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The same decision is reapproved at several tiers without additional judgment.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P071-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must identify a local decision-making unit rather than only a central actor.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A local unit is responsible for or affected by a matter requiring a decision.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail that the decision can be reversed rather than being irreversible or catastrophic.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The matter is reversible.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the local unit's superlative knowledge advantage over all relevant decision participants, not merely a pairwise advantage over the center.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The local unit has the best relevant understanding of the matter among the decision participants, including the central approval tier.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail a central authorization dependency for the local decision.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The local unit must obtain central approval before acting on the matter.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail actual delay or waiting rather than a merely formal approval requirement with no hold-up.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The local unit waits while central approval is pending.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "Local units wait for central approval on reversible matters they understand best.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Central approval delays locally understood reversible decisions.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P071-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Tiered autonomy would keep such reversible decisions local; waiting is its inverse.", "slug": "local_autonomy_tiered_escalation"}], "residual_id": "r:layered_coordination_oversight:b037_a15_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b037_a15_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when local actors can act quickly but cannot internalize system-wide consequences, or when central actors can coordinate externalities but cannot see case-level reality. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Local units wait for central approval on reversible matters they understand best.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["local units wait for central approval on reversible matters they understand best", "It is especially useful when local actors can act quickly but cannot internalize system-wide consequences, or when central actors can coordinate externalities but cannot see case-level reality."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Tiered autonomy would keep such reversible decisions local; waiting is its inverse.", "slug": "local_autonomy_tiered_escalation"}], "normalized_requirement": "Local units wait for central approval on reversible matters they understand best.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Local units wait for central approval on reversible matters they understand best.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Local optimization, information opacity, and weak cross-boundary integration are explicit mandatory mechanisms.", "role_mapping": "Units -> isolated subsystems; local optimization -> incentive misalignment; invisible risk -> information opacity.", "slug": "systemic_fragmentation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b037_a15_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: system-wide risks or externalities remain invisible because every unit optimizes locally. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["system-wide risks or externalities remain invisible because every unit optimizes locally"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Systemic Fragmentation", "one_liner": "Siloed subsystems.", "page_ref": "prime:systemic_fragmentation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Units -> isolated subsystems; local optimization -> incentive misalignment; invisible risk -> information opacity.", "slug": "systemic_fragmentation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Local optimization, information opacity, and weak cross-boundary integration are explicit mandatory mechanisms."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Boundary-isolated units optimize locally while system-wide risks or externalities remain invisible.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P072-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail an intermediate hierarchical tier whose operative function includes relaying reports.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A middle tier receives and relays reports between organizational levels.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete branch may establish that the relay tier lacks decision or coordination authority.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The middle tier lacks authority sufficient for substantive coordination.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete branch may establish that the relay tier lacks the capability to perform substantive coordination.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The middle tier lacks capability sufficient for substantive coordination.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail failure of substantive conflict resolution or coordination, not merely imperfect report quality.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The middle tier cannot resolve cross-level conflicts or otherwise add coordination value.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "A middle tier relays reports but lacks either the authority or the capability needed to resolve conflicts and add coordination value.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A relay-only middle tier lacks substantive coordinating power.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P072-C01-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Oversight capacity can be adequate and delegated tiers can add substantive judgment.", "slug": "oversight_capacity"}], "residual_id": "r:layered_coordination_oversight:b037_a15_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b037_a15_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: middle layers relay reports but cannot resolve conflicts or add coordination value. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["middle layers relay reports but cannot resolve conflicts or add coordination value"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Oversight capacity can be adequate and delegated tiers can add substantive judgment.", "slug": "oversight_capacity"}], "normalized_requirement": "Middle tiers relay reports but lack authority or capability to resolve conflicts or coordinate.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Middle tiers relay reports but lack authority or capability to resolve conflicts or coordinate.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B5", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P072-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail upward hierarchical summarization, not merely general information loss.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Local information is compressed into a summary sent upward in a hierarchy.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail suppression or loss from the summary rather than preservation with lower salience.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Decision-relevant content is omitted from the upward summary.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete branch must concern loss of variance or distributional spread.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The omitted content can be local variance.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete branch must concern loss of disagreement or minority judgment.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The omitted content can be dissent.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete branch must concern loss of uncertainty or confidence information.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The omitted content can be uncertainty.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete branch must concern suppression of a tail case with high consequence.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The omitted content can be a rare high-consequence case.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "An upward hierarchical summary omits variance, dissent, uncertainty, or rare high-consequence cases.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Upward summarization suppresses decision-relevant heterogeneity or warning signals.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P072-C02-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact prime requires an ordered event-inclusion pipeline and non-random count loss; a summary can omit variance without undercounting events.", "slug": "reporting_pyramid_undercount"}], "residual_id": "r:layered_coordination_oversight:b037_a15_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b037_a15_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A lower tier waits for approval on work it understands; a higher tier receives summaries stripped of uncertainty and tail risk; a middle tier relays rather than judges; lateral dependencies detour through the vertical chain; and escalated authority becomes permanent because no reentry condition exists. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Upward summaries omit variance, dissent, uncertainty, or rare high-consequence cases.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["upward summaries omit variance, dissent, uncertainty, or rare high-consequence cases", "A lower tier waits for approval on work it understands; a higher tier receives summaries stripped of uncertainty and tail risk; a middle tier relays rather than judges; lateral dependencies detour through the vertical chain; and escalated authority becomes permanent because no reentry condition exists."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact prime requires an ordered event-inclusion pipeline and non-random count loss; a summary can omit variance without undercounting events.", "slug": "reporting_pyramid_undercount"}], "normalized_requirement": "Upward summaries omit variance, dissent, uncertainty, or rare high-consequence cases.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Upward summaries omit variance, dissent, uncertainty, or rare high-consequence cases.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 5", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B6", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P072-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must identify a center-to-local mandate or policy implementation relation.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A centrally issued policy is directed to a local implementing tier.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail a missing prerequisite, not merely difficulty or delay in implementation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A prerequisite for local implementation is absent.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete branch must concern absent translation or interpretation of central policy for local use.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The missing prerequisite can be local interpretation.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete branch must concern insufficient local capacity to enact the policy.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The missing prerequisite can be local implementation capacity.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete branch must concern absent resources required by local implementers.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The missing prerequisite can be local resources.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete branch must concern absent machinery for locally exceptional cases.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The missing prerequisite can be local exception handling.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "A centrally issued policy reaches local implementers without interpretation, capacity, resources, or exception handling needed for implementation.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Central policy lacks a local implementation prerequisite.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P072-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Tiered escalation includes local authority and interpretation; missing implementation support is its inverse.", "slug": "local_autonomy_tiered_escalation"}], "residual_id": "r:layered_coordination_oversight:b037_a15_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b037_a15_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Decisions are centralized despite local knowledge, delegated without resources or limits, repeatedly approved at several levels, or escalated without a return path. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Central policy arrives without local interpretation, capacity, resources, or exception handling.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["central policy arrives without local interpretation, capacity, resources, or exception handling", "Decisions are centralized despite local knowledge, delegated without resources or limits, repeatedly approved at several levels, or escalated without a return path."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A locally authored ambiguous rule preserves the candidate but falsifies central issuance; the emitted provenance-and-destination predicate excludes exactly that case.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Rules-of-Engagement Ambiguity", "one_liner": "Diagnose frontline breakdown under time pressure as a grain mismatch — decision rules written coarser than the environment generates choice points — paid out of a finite discretion budget, relocating the fix from the operator's judgment to the rule, escalation path, and pre-positioned authority.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:rules_of_engagement_ambiguity", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "decision_rule_centrally_issued_to_frontline_implementers", "predicate": "The decision rule is issued by a central policy authority to the frontline implementing tier.", "rationale": "SSD and one full DNF branch pass after the emitted atomic qualifier. A locally authored ambiguous rule preserves the candidate but falsifies central issuance; the emitted provenance-and-destination predicate excludes exactly that case. The qualifier is sufficient and does not restate the unit head."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "rules_of_engagement_ambiguity"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The decision rule is issued by a central policy authority to the frontline implementing tier."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "rules_of_engagement_ambiguity", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P072-C03-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record supplies a missing local exception mechanism, and one atomic issuance relation completes the central-policy branch."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Central policy arrives without local interpretation, capacity, resources, or exception handling.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 6", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B7", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P072-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"], ["O1", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail an upward escalation with distinguishable origin and receiving tiers.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A matter is escalated from an originating tier to a higher forum.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete branch must entail disappearance or loss within the receiving higher forum.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The higher forum loses or fails to maintain a traceable disposition of the escalation.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete branch must entail failure of the downward return path to the origin tier.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "No resolution, disposition, or feedback returns to the originating tier.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "An escalation disappears into a higher forum or never returns to its originating tier.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An escalation lacks traceable closure in the higher forum or on its return path.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P072-C04-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A functioning tiered escalation system returns decisions and does not entail lost escalations.", "slug": "local_autonomy_tiered_escalation"}], "residual_id": "r:layered_coordination_oversight:b037_a15_c7", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b037_a15_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: escalations disappear into a higher forum or never return to the originating tier. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["escalations disappear into a higher forum or never return to the originating tier"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A functioning tiered escalation system returns decisions and does not entail lost escalations.", "slug": "local_autonomy_tiered_escalation"}], "normalized_requirement": "Escalations disappear into higher forums or never return to the originating tier.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Escalations disappear into higher forums or never return to the originating tier.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 7", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B8", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact constraint is a context-dependent span threshold beyond which oversight quality degrades under relationship and coordination load.", "role_mapping": "Caseload or span -> sub-unit count; attention -> supervisory capacity; excess -> quality-degradation curve.", "slug": "oversight_capacity", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b037_a15_c8", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: oversight caseload, span, or reporting demand exceeds reviewer attention. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["oversight caseload, span, or reporting demand exceeds reviewer attention"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Oversight Capacity", "one_liner": "Limits of supervision.", "page_ref": "prime:oversight_capacity", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Caseload or span -> sub-unit count; attention -> supervisory capacity; excess -> quality-degradation curve.", "slug": "oversight_capacity", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact constraint is a context-dependent span threshold beyond which oversight quality degrades under relationship and coordination load."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Oversight caseload, span, and synchronization demand exceed reviewers' feasible attention and judgment capacity.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [8], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 8", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B9", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P072-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail actual cross-boundary work or dependency, not mere organizational adjacency.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Work or an operational dependency crosses a governance boundary.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete branch must concern work crossing between organizational units.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The crossed boundary can separate organizational units.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete branch must concern work crossing between distinct jurisdictions.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The crossed boundary can separate jurisdictions.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail absence of an authorized coordination interface rather than an interface with incompatible contracts.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "No authorized interface coordinates the cross-boundary work.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Work crosses an organizational-unit or jurisdictional boundary without an authorized coordination interface.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Cross-boundary work lacks an authorized coordination interface.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P072-C05-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Interface mismatch requires conflicting offered and required contracts, not merely absence of authorization.", "slug": "interface_mismatch"}], "residual_id": "r:layered_coordination_oversight:b037_a15_c9", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b037_a15_c9", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: lateral work crosses units or jurisdictions without an authorized interface. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [9], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["lateral work crosses units or jurisdictions without an authorized interface"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Interface mismatch requires conflicting offered and required contracts, not merely absence of authorization.", "slug": "interface_mismatch"}], "normalized_requirement": "Work crosses units or jurisdictions without an authorized coordination interface.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Work crosses units or jurisdictions without an authorized coordination interface.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [9], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 9", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B10", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P071-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require that the emergency condition initiated the centralized arrangement, not merely that it could later justify it.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An emergency condition triggers centralization of authority.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require cessation of the condition that initiated or justified centralization.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The triggering emergency condition ends.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve persistence beyond trigger cessation rather than centralization ending with the emergency.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The centralized authority remains in effect after the triggering condition ends.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "Emergency centralization persists after its triggering condition ends.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Emergency central authority outlives the condition that justified it.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P071-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Controlled reentry restores normal operation; persistent emergency control is a failed or absent reentry.", "slug": "controlled_reentry"}], "residual_id": "r:layered_coordination_oversight:b037_a15_c10", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b037_a15_c10", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: emergency centralization persists after its trigger ends. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [10], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["emergency centralization persists after its trigger ends"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Controlled reentry restores normal operation; persistent emergency control is a failed or absent reentry.", "slug": "controlled_reentry"}], "normalized_requirement": "Emergency centralization persists after its triggering condition ends.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Emergency centralization persists after its triggering condition ends.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [10], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 10", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B11", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Autonomous-practice divergence, duplicated effort, incentive misalignment, and coordination-deficit infrastructure are the exact pattern.", "role_mapping": "Local units -> isolated subsystems; incompatible standards -> practice divergence; duplicated work or spillover -> integration failure.", "slug": "systemic_fragmentation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b037_a15_c11", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: local autonomy produces incompatible standards, duplicated work, inequity, or unmanaged spillovers. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [11], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["local autonomy produces incompatible standards, duplicated work, inequity, or unmanaged spillovers"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Systemic Fragmentation", "one_liner": "Siloed subsystems.", "page_ref": "prime:systemic_fragmentation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Local units -> isolated subsystems; incompatible standards -> practice divergence; duplicated work or spillover -> integration failure.", "slug": "systemic_fragmentation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Autonomous-practice divergence, duplicated effort, incentive misalignment, and coordination-deficit infrastructure are the exact pattern."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Autonomous units develop incompatible standards, duplicate work, inequity, or unmanaged cross-boundary spillovers.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [11], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 11", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "DISJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 37, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-037", "ledger_sha256": "859a7568072d93bdeb3981bd17279e1107b1f42fb0bdb7c9ee9ecd0be83bcdd4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Layered Defense Gap Decorrelation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:layered_defense_gap_decorrelation", "slug": "layered_defense_gap_decorrelation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 7 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 7}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system depends on multiple imperfect defensive layers, but the organization evaluates each layer locally or symbolically rather than as part of a serial hazard path. Because holes in different layers are undocumented, correlated, or owned separately, a hazard can pass through aligned gaps even though every layer appears to exist on paper.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system depends on multiple imperfect defensive layers, but the organization evaluates each layer locally or symbolically rather than as part of a serial hazard path. Because holes in different layers are undocumented, correlated, or owned separately, a hazard can pass through aligned gaps even though every layer appears to exist on paper."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A defended catastrophe, hazard trajectory, and simultaneous hole through every serial layer are the exact structure.", "role_mapping": "Harm -> defended outcome; sequential failures -> aligned holes; controls -> serial layers.", "slug": "swiss_cheese_model", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "Total compromise requires an all-layers path through multiple barriers in series.", "role_mapping": "Hazard -> directed threat; controls -> barriers; several failures -> all-layers breach path.", "slug": "defense_in_depth", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b038_a01_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A serious harm requires several defenses, checks, policies, barriers, controls, or recovery layers to fail or be bypassed in sequence. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A serious harm requires several defenses, checks, policies, barriers, controls, or recovery layers to fail or be bypassed in sequence."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Swiss Cheese Model (Layered Defense with Aligning Holes)", "one_liner": "Catastrophe occurs only when a hazard finds a trajectory through a hole in every serial defensive layer at once, so the key variable is the correlation of holes across layers.", "page_ref": "prime:swiss_cheese_model", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Harm -> defended outcome; sequential failures -> aligned holes; controls -> serial layers.", "slug": "swiss_cheese_model", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A defended catastrophe, hazard trajectory, and simultaneous hole through every serial layer are the exact structure."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Defense In Depth", "one_liner": "Stacking multiple independent protective layers between threat and asset so that only a correlated breach across all layers produces total loss.", "page_ref": "prime:defense_in_depth", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Hazard -> directed threat; controls -> barriers; several failures -> all-layers breach path.", "slug": "defense_in_depth", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Total compromise requires an all-layers path through multiple barriers in series."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A hazard reaches serious harm only by traversing gaps in several serial defensive layers.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Serial layers are explicitly imperfect and each contains holes.", "role_mapping": "Layer imperfection -> holes; bypass -> unblocked trajectory.", "slug": "swiss_cheese_model", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "Non-trivial per-layer failure probability is mandatory; no single layer is heroic.", "role_mapping": "Imperfect controls -> per-layer failure probability.", "slug": "defense_in_depth", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b038_a01_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Each layer is known to be imperfect, overloaded, bypassable, conditional, locally optimized, or subject to drift. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Each layer is known to be imperfect, overloaded, bypassable, conditional, locally optimized, or subject to drift."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Swiss Cheese Model (Layered Defense with Aligning Holes)", "one_liner": "Catastrophe occurs only when a hazard finds a trajectory through a hole in every serial defensive layer at once, so the key variable is the correlation of holes across layers.", "page_ref": "prime:swiss_cheese_model", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Layer imperfection -> holes; bypass -> unblocked trajectory.", "slug": "swiss_cheese_model", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Serial layers are explicitly imperfect and each contains holes."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Defense In Depth", "one_liner": "Stacking multiple independent protective layers between threat and asset so that only a correlated breach across all layers produces total loss.", "page_ref": "prime:defense_in_depth", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Imperfect controls -> per-layer failure probability.", "slug": "defense_in_depth", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Non-trivial per-layer failure probability is mandatory; no single layer is heroic."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Each defensive layer has a non-trivial probability of an open, bypassed, degraded, or overloaded path.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Hole correlation across layers is the load-bearing variable and common causes align holes.", "role_mapping": "Shared dependencies -> common cause; aligned failures -> correlated holes.", "slug": "swiss_cheese_model", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "Independence of failure modes is the load-bearing assumption, and shared causes collapse the multiplicative benefit.", "role_mapping": "Shared people or vendor -> correlated failure; layers -> purported independent barriers.", "slug": "defense_in_depth", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b038_a01_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Layers may share people, assumptions, incentives, data, vendors, infrastructure, timing, environmental exposures, or operational pressures. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Layers may share people, assumptions, incentives, data, vendors, infrastructure, timing, environmental exposures, or operational pressures."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Swiss Cheese Model (Layered Defense with Aligning Holes)", "one_liner": "Catastrophe occurs only when a hazard finds a trajectory through a hole in every serial defensive layer at once, so the key variable is the correlation of holes across layers.", "page_ref": "prime:swiss_cheese_model", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Shared dependencies -> common cause; aligned failures -> correlated holes.", "slug": "swiss_cheese_model", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Hole correlation across layers is the load-bearing variable and common causes align holes."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Defense In Depth", "one_liner": "Stacking multiple independent protective layers between threat and asset so that only a correlated breach across all layers produces total loss.", "page_ref": "prime:defense_in_depth", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Shared people or vendor -> correlated failure; layers -> purported independent barriers.", "slug": "defense_in_depth", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Independence of failure modes is the load-bearing assumption, and shared causes collapse the multiplicative benefit."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Failure dependence among layers is governed by shared people, assumptions, incentives, data, vendors, infrastructure, timing, or exposure.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P072-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must concern multiple defensive or safety-control layers, not generic redundancy.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A system has multiple nominal defensive layers.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail layer count or nominal presence doing evidential work in the safety claim.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A safety claim treats the number or existence of layers as evidence of protection.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail that cross-layer failure independence or decorrelation is unverified.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The claim does not establish independence among layer failures.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail that actual operational health or efficacy of the layers is unverified.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The claim does not establish the current health of the layers.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail that the layers' condition or failure is not adequately observable.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The claim does not establish observability of layer state or failure.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail that cross-layer gap alignment along one hazard path is unexamined.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The claim does not establish whether gaps align across layers.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "A safety claim relies on nominal defense-layer count without establishing layer independence, health, observability, and gap alignment.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Nominal defense-layer count substitutes for verified defense quality and decorrelation.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P072-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact record defines security by independent failures required, explicitly rejecting layer count without independence.", "slug": "defense_in_depth"}], "residual_id": "r:layered_defense_gap_decorrelation:b038_a01_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b038_a01_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Safety claims emphasize the number of layers rather than the independence, health, observability, and alignment of those layers. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Safety claims emphasize the number of layers rather than the independence, health, observability, and alignment of those layers."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact record defines security by independent failures required, explicitly rejecting layer count without independence.", "slug": "defense_in_depth"}], "normalized_requirement": "Safety claims count nominal layers without establishing their independence, health, observability, or alignment.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Safety claims count nominal layers without establishing their independence, health, observability, or alignment.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P072-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must identify controls positioned serially against the same hazard path.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Multiple nominal controls lie along one hazard trajectory.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail traversal of the same trajectory through the controls, not independent unrelated control failures.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The observed hazard trajectory passes through the nominal controls without being blocked.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete branch must concern an actual incident outcome.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The observation can be an incident.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete branch must concern a near miss that exposes the same control-path failure.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The observation can be a near miss.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "An incident or near miss demonstrates that nominal controls existed yet failed to block the same hazard trajectory.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Observed hazard progression passes through all nominal controls on its trajectory.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P072-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The model can be used prospectively before any incident or near miss has occurred.", "slug": "swiss_cheese_model"}], "residual_id": "r:layered_defense_gap_decorrelation:b038_a01_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b038_a01_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Incidents or near misses show that nominal controls existed but did not block the same hazard trajectory. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Incidents or near misses show that nominal controls existed but did not block the same hazard trajectory."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "If any defensive layer blocks the trajectory, the sharp-end act does not complete the candidate's accident path.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Active Failure", "one_liner": "The frontline operator's act at the sharp end that completes a hazard path by aligning with holes latent conditions had pre-positioned in a system's layered defenses — the proximate, visible half of Reason's Swiss cheese model.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:active_failure", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "active_failure"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "active_failure", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P072-C07-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every complete active-failure instance entails an incident trajectory traversing the layered defenses through aligned holes."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Ungarded causal gates may be ordinary operational states rather than controls; the nominal-control type restriction excludes that complete counterexample.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Latent-Path Activation", "one_liner": "Explain harm that arrives while every factor is individually in-range as a previously inert causal path going live only when a rare conjunction of gating states closes every edge along it at once.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:latent_path_activation", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "TYPE_SUBSUMPTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "activated_path_gates_are_nominal_controls", "predicate": "The gated edges along the activated hazard path are nominal defensive controls.", "rationale": "SSD and one full DNF branch pass after the emitted atomic qualifier. Ungarded causal gates may be ordinary operational states rather than controls; the nominal-control type restriction excludes that complete counterexample. The qualifier is sufficient and does not restate the unit head."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "latent_path_activation"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The gated edges along the activated hazard path are nominal defensive controls."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "latent_path_activation", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P072-C07-U1", "why_it_fits": "Conditional connectivity supplies the full incident passage, while one shared gate-type predicate supplies the serial-control role."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Incidents show nominal controls existed but failed to block the same hazard trajectory.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P072-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail distributed ownership of defense or control layers across organizational actors.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Different defensive layers are owned by different actors.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail an ownership gap at the cross-layer level, not merely local control ownership.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "No actor has adequate responsibility for identifying and managing correlated gaps across layers.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Defense-layer ownership is distributed across actors so no one is responsible for cross-layer gap correlation.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Fragmented defense ownership leaves cross-layer gaps unmanaged.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P072-C08-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Defense ownership can be centralized and explicit; distribution across teams is not mandatory.", "slug": "defense_in_depth"}], "residual_id": "r:layered_defense_gap_decorrelation:b038_a01_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b038_a01_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Ownership is distributed across teams, roles, sites, contractors, or institutions, making cross-layer gap management weak. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Ownership is distributed across teams, roles, sites, contractors, or institutions, making cross-layer gap management weak."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Defense ownership can be centralized and explicit; distribution across teams is not mandatory.", "slug": "defense_in_depth"}], "normalized_requirement": "Distributed ownership leaves no actor responsible for cross-layer gap correlation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Distributed ownership leaves no actor responsible for cross-layer gap correlation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The model requires rare alignment but not an organization using ordinary averages that conceal the risk.", "slug": "swiss_cheese_model"}], "residual_id": "r:layered_defense_gap_decorrelation:b038_a01_c7", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b038_a01_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The failure mode is low-frequency and high-consequence, so ordinary averages hide dangerous alignments. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The failure mode is low-frequency and high-consequence, so ordinary averages hide dangerous alignments."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The model requires rare alignment but not an organization using ordinary averages that conceal the risk.", "slug": "swiss_cheese_model"}], "normalized_requirement": "The aligned failure is rare and catastrophic enough that ordinary averages conceal it.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The aligned failure is rare and catastrophic enough that ordinary averages conceal it.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 38, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-038", "ledger_sha256": "9eac1cd431cdfd74bfc850fd9813997b6fcb59dca9656454602e305650a3bdcf"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Layered Model Validation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:layered_model_validation", "slug": "layered_model_validation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is that refinement can degrade as well as improve a model. Added detail may create apparent realism while hiding the signal, breaking a known-valid baseline, overfitting a local case, increasing maintenance burden, or making the model harder to explain. Complexity often arrives with social momentum: once a layer is built, documented, or politically endorsed, teams may keep it even when it fails to improve the decision.\n\nThe archetype becomes necessary when the system needs a way to tell validated complexity from decorative complexity. Without that distinction, refinement accumulates layers faster than evidence can justify them.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Refinements may add realism, but they can also introduce noise, inconsistency, overfitting, maintenance burden, or false confidence."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P072-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail an existing artifact or operational process that can receive added detail, without requiring it to represent a separate target system.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An existing model, prototype, policy, plan, or operational process is being refined.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail additive elaboration of the artifact rather than replacement or mere evaluation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The artifact is refined by adding a new layer of representational or operational detail.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "A model, prototype, policy, plan, or process is refined by adding representational or operational detail.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An artifact or process gains an additional layer of detail.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P072-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Validation can test an unchanged simple artifact and does not require layered elaboration.", "slug": "validation"}], "residual_id": "r:layered_model_validation:b038_a02_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b038_a02_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A model, prototype, policy, plan, or process is being refined by adding variables, rules, resolution, constraints, scenarios, data sources, or operational detail. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A model, prototype, policy, plan, or process is being refined by adding variables, rules, resolution, constraints, scenarios, data sources, or operational detail."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Validation can test an unchanged simple artifact and does not require layered elaboration.", "slug": "validation"}], "normalized_requirement": "A model or plan is refined by adding variables, rules, resolution, constraints, scenarios, sources, or operational detail.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A model or plan is refined by adding variables, rules, resolution, constraints, scenarios, sources, or operational detail.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P072-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must concern added representational detail, not complexity arising for another reason.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A team proposes or performs an addition of detail to a representation.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail a realism-improvement belief or justification attached to the added detail.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The team expects the added detail to improve realism.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail absence of an explicit incremental decision-value criterion.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "No criterion specifies the incremental decision value the detail should add.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "A team expects added detail to improve realism without specifying its incremental decision value.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Added detail is justified by presumed realism rather than a defined incremental decision-value criterion.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P072-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Accidental complexity can arise without a realism claim or an unspecified value criterion for added model detail.", "slug": "accidental_vs_essential_complexity"}], "residual_id": "r:layered_model_validation:b038_a02_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b038_a02_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The team believes more detail will improve realism, but has not specified what value the detail should add. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The team believes more detail will improve realism, but has not specified what value the detail should add."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Accidental complexity can arise without a realism claim or an unspecified value criterion for added model detail.", "slug": "accidental_vs_essential_complexity"}], "normalized_requirement": "The team expects detail to improve realism without specifying its incremental decision value.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The team expects detail to improve realism without specifying its incremental decision value.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P072-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must identify an earlier, simpler representational core rather than simplicity in general.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A representation has an earlier simple core.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete branch must preserve explanatory value of the simple core.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The simple core has explanatory value.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete branch must preserve decision value of the simple core.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The simple core has decision value.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail later-added complexity, not complexity already constitutive of the core.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Additional representational complexity is introduced after the simple core.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail the possibility of obscuration rather than requiring that obscuration has already occurred.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The later complexity can obscure the useful simple core.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "Later representational complexity can obscure an earlier simple core that has explanatory or decision value.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Later complexity can obscure a useful simple core.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P072-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Validation does not entail an earlier simple core or later obscuring complexity.", "slug": "validation"}], "residual_id": "r:layered_model_validation:b038_a02_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b038_a02_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A simple core model has explanatory or decision value that could be obscured by later complexity. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A simple core model has explanatory or decision value that could be obscured by later complexity."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Validation does not entail an earlier simple core or later obscuring complexity.", "slug": "validation"}], "normalized_requirement": "A useful simple explanatory core may be obscured by later representational complexity.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A useful simple explanatory core may be obscured by later representational complexity.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P072-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail earlier validated guarantees, not merely earlier artifact existence.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Guarantees have already been established for one or more prior layers.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail a later-added layer whose interaction with prior guarantees is at issue.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A new representational layer is added after those guarantees are established.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail possible guarantee invalidation caused by adding the new layer.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The new layer can invalidate a prior guarantee.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the silent or unnoticed character of the possible breakage.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The invalidation can occur without being detected or declared.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "A newly added model layer can silently invalidate guarantees established for prior layers.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A new representation layer can silently break prior validated guarantees.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P072-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Validation can confirm that a new layer preserves prior guarantees; silent breakage is not universal.", "slug": "validation"}], "residual_id": "r:layered_model_validation:b038_a02_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b038_a02_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Prior layers have already been validated and must not be silently broken by a new layer. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Prior layers have already been validated and must not be silently broken by a new layer."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Validation can confirm that a new layer preserves prior guarantees; silent breakage is not universal.", "slug": "validation"}], "normalized_requirement": "A newly added model layer may silently invalidate guarantees established for prior layers.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A newly added model layer may silently invalidate guarantees established for prior layers.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Stakeholders need assurance that a refined representation is better than the simpler version for the intended decision.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: Stakeholders need assurance that a refined representation is better than the simpler version for the intended decision. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders need assurance that a refined representation is better than the simpler version for the intended decision."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Stakeholders need assurance that a refined representation is better than the simpler version for the intended decision."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 38, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-038", "ledger_sha256": "9eac1cd431cdfd74bfc850fd9813997b6fcb59dca9656454602e305650a3bdcf"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Layered Record Accumulation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:layered_record_accumulation", "slug": "layered_record_accumulation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is historical flattening. A system changes over time, but its record design keeps only the final state or stores old material as an undifferentiated heap. Later actors can see what exists now, but cannot reconstruct the order of change, the rationale behind decisions, the evidence supporting claims, the actors involved, or the conditions under which prior layers were created.\n\nThis produces predictable symptoms: incident reviews take too long, teams rediscover old decisions, audits become guesswork, handoffs lose context, old errors reappear, and summaries preserve conclusions while erasing uncertainty. The deeper tension is that preservation has costs. A record can become too large, too sensitive, too hard to search, or too easy to misuse. The archetype therefore requires both accumulation and governance.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system changes, accumulates, revises, or deposits information over time, but overwritten, flattened, or contextless records erase the sequence of formation. Later actors can see the present state but cannot reliably reconstruct how it emerged, which layers are still active, who changed what, why a decision was made, or what evidence supports a current claim."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Sequential deposition atop prior units preserves a layer-indexed temporal record.", "role_mapping": "Repeated changes -> deposited units; layer order -> time index.", "slug": "layered_accumulation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b038_a03_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Changes occur in repeated layers, revisions, deposits, episodes, interventions, decisions, or observations. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Changes occur in repeated layers, revisions, deposits, episodes, interventions, decisions, or observations."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Layered Accumulation", "one_liner": "Sequential time-ordered deposition in which each new layer rests atop the prior ones, so the position of a layer encodes when it formed and the stack becomes a readable record of history.", "page_ref": "prime:layered_accumulation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Repeated changes -> deposited units; layer order -> time index.", "slug": "layered_accumulation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Sequential deposition atop prior units preserves a layer-indexed temporal record."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Changes are deposited as sequential revisions, episodes, observations, or other time-ordered layers.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The stack's geometry encodes formation order, making earlier layers prior to and explanatory of later ones.", "role_mapping": "Earlier changes -> lower layers; later changes -> upper layers; order -> temporal record.", "slug": "layered_accumulation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b038_a03_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The order of changes matters because earlier layers constrain, explain, or contaminate later layers. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The order of changes matters because earlier layers constrain, explain, or contaminate later layers."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Layered Accumulation", "one_liner": "Sequential time-ordered deposition in which each new layer rests atop the prior ones, so the position of a layer encodes when it formed and the stack becomes a readable record of history.", "page_ref": "prime:layered_accumulation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Earlier changes -> lower layers; later changes -> upper layers; order -> temporal record.", "slug": "layered_accumulation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The stack's geometry encodes formation order, making earlier layers prior to and explanatory of later ones."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Layer order matters because earlier deposits constrain, explain, or contaminate later layers.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P072-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O5", "O6"], ["O1", "O3", "O5", "O6"], ["O1", "O4", "O5", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must concern a record with formation history that later actors may need to reconstruct.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A layered record contains detail about its sequence or process of formation.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete branch must concern compaction of the layered record.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The record-reducing operation can be compaction.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete branch must concern summarization of the layered record.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The record-reducing operation can be summarization.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete branch must concern archival pressure that favors detail reduction.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The record-reducing pressure can be archival pressure.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail possibility or risk of loss rather than require completed destruction.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The operation or pressure creates a risk of losing detail.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must connect the threatened detail specifically to reconstruction of formation history.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The detail at risk is necessary to reconstruct how the layered record formed.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Compaction, summarization, or archival pressure can remove detail needed to reconstruct how a layered record formed.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Record compression can destroy formation detail needed for reconstruction.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P072-C13-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An undisturbed layered record can remain fully readable; compaction pressure and detail loss are not mandatory.", "slug": "layered_accumulation"}], "residual_id": "r:layered_record_accumulation:b038_a03_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b038_a03_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Compaction, summarization, or archival pressure creates risk of losing necessary detail. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Compaction, summarization, or archival pressure creates risk of losing necessary detail."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An undisturbed layered record can remain fully readable; compaction pressure and detail loss are not mandatory.", "slug": "layered_accumulation"}], "normalized_requirement": "Compaction, summarization, or archiving can remove detail necessary to reconstruct the layered record.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Compaction, summarization, or archiving can remove detail necessary to reconstruct the layered record.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Current-state snapshots are insufficient for audit, repair, learning, accountability, restoration, or causal interpretation.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially valuable when audits, handoffs, repairs, restoration, accountability, learning, or causal investigation repeatedly fail because previous states were overwritten or stripped of context. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Current-state snapshots are insufficient for audit, repair, learning, accountability, restoration, or causal interpretation. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Current-state snapshots are insufficient for audit, repair, learning, accountability, restoration, or causal interpretation.", "It is especially valuable when audits, handoffs, repairs, restoration, accountability, learning, or causal investigation repeatedly fail because previous states were overwritten or stripped of context."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "Current-state snapshots are insufficient for audit, repair, learning, accountability, restoration, or causal interpretation."}, {"display_text": "Multiple actors, sources, systems, or time periods contribute to the record.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system changes over time, but its record design keeps only the final state or stores old material as an undifferentiated heap. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Multiple actors, sources, systems, or time periods contribute to the record. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Multiple actors, sources, systems, or time periods contribute to the record.", "A system changes over time, but its record design keeps only the final state or stores old material as an undifferentiated heap."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Multiple actors, sources, systems, or time periods contribute to the record."}, {"display_text": "Regulatory, evidentiary, scientific, historical, or organizational continuity requires knowing the path of formation.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when the path of formation matters. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: Regulatory, evidentiary, scientific, historical, or organizational continuity requires knowing the path of formation. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Regulatory, evidentiary, scientific, historical, or organizational continuity requires knowing the path of formation.", "Use this archetype when the path of formation matters."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Regulatory, evidentiary, scientific, historical, or organizational continuity requires knowing the path of formation."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 38, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-038", "ledger_sha256": "9eac1cd431cdfd74bfc850fd9813997b6fcb59dca9656454602e305650a3bdcf"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Lead-Support Channel Orchestration", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:lead_support_channel_orchestration", "slug": "lead_support_channel_orchestration"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 6, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 5, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "6 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system presents multiple related channels at once, but their relative authority is ambiguous. Channels compete for salience, duplicate inconsistently, contradict timing, or switch register without coordination, forcing the receiver to infer which channel is primary and which channels are context, accompaniment, explanation, warning, or reinforcement.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system presents multiple related channels at once, but their relative authority is ambiguous. Channels compete for salience, duplicate inconsistently, contradict timing, or switch register without coordination, forcing the receiver to infer which channel is primary and which channels are context, accompaniment, explanation, warning, or reinforcement."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact substrate contains one lead and one or more support channels carrying related content simultaneously.", "role_mapping": "Several channels -> ensemble; related content -> shared utterance.", "slug": "lead_and_support_hierarchy", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b038_a04_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Examples include melody and accompaniment, speaker and slides, primary metric and contextual panels, voice and captions, text and alert tone, or commander and liaison streams. In this condition set, the requirement is: Several simultaneous channels carry related content as one ensemble.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Several channels carry related content simultaneously."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Lead-and-Support Hierarchy", "one_liner": "When multiple simultaneous channels carry related content, one channel takes the lead while the others provide coordinated, structurally subordinate support that actively defers to it in prominence, timing, and register, producing a figure-ground hierarchy across the channels.", "page_ref": "prime:lead_and_support_hierarchy", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Several channels -> ensemble; related content -> shared utterance.", "slug": "lead_and_support_hierarchy", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact substrate contains one lead and one or more support channels carrying related content simultaneously."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Several simultaneous channels carry related content as one ensemble.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A single foreground lead channel is the figure-ground invariant.", "role_mapping": "Follow first -> lead role; receiver -> ensemble interpreter.", "slug": "lead_and_support_hierarchy", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b038_a04_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The pattern matters when attention, sequence, or decision priority cannot be left ambiguous. In this condition set, the requirement is: The receiver needs one channel to be foregrounded as the primary message.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The receiver must know what to follow first."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Lead-and-Support Hierarchy", "one_liner": "When multiple simultaneous channels carry related content, one channel takes the lead while the others provide coordinated, structurally subordinate support that actively defers to it in prominence, timing, and register, producing a figure-ground hierarchy across the channels.", "page_ref": "prime:lead_and_support_hierarchy", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Follow first -> lead role; receiver -> ensemble interpreter.", "slug": "lead_and_support_hierarchy", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A single foreground lead channel is the figure-ground invariant."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The receiver needs one channel to be foregrounded as the primary message.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P072-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve distinct lead and support communication roles.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A lead channel and a subordinate support channel are presented together.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail possible attention displacement caused by the support channel.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The support channel can divert receiver attention away from the lead.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "A support channel can distract attention from the lead channel.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A support channel can divert attention from the lead.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P072-C14-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P072-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a lead-support hierarchy rather than two peer channels.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A lead channel and a subordinate support channel have distinguishable authority or scope.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail possible overclaiming relative to the support channel's proper role.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The support channel can claim authority, certainty, or scope beyond that subordinate role.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "A support channel can overclaim relative to the lead channel.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A support channel can exceed its subordinate scope or authority.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P072-C14-U2"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P072-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve intended lead and support roles.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A designated lead channel and support channel are presented together.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail possible rivalry rather than mere duplication or accompaniment.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The support channel can compete with the lead for receiver salience or perceived authority.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "A support channel can compete with the lead channel for salience or authority.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A support channel can rival the lead channel.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P072-C14-U3"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P072-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the lead message and the accompanying support message as distinct roles.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A lead communication is accompanied by a support channel.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail possible reframing of the lead, not simply added detail.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The support channel can alter the frame through which the lead is interpreted.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "A support channel can reframe how the lead channel is interpreted.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A support channel can alter the interpretive frame of the lead.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P072-C14-U4"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P072-C14", "dnf": [], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [], "predicate": "Support channels can add value to a lead channel.", "resolution": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RESIDUAL", "semantic_scope": "NON_ABSTRACTION", "structural_head": "Support channels add value.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P072-C14-U5"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A correctly orchestrated support channel actively defers and need not distract or overclaim.", "slug": "lead_and_support_hierarchy"}], "residual_id": "r:lead_support_channel_orchestration:b038_a04_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b038_a04_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Support must be strong enough to help and weak enough not to steal the figure. In this condition set, the requirement is: Support channels may distract, overclaim, compete with, or reframe the lead.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Support channels add value but can also distract, overclaim, or reframe."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "An arbitrary distraction need not involve communications, but the general bridge types a designated lead/support channel pair into the candidate's primary/secondary attentional roles.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_BRIDGE", "name": "Distraction", "one_liner": "The involuntary capture of an agent's scarce attention by a salient secondary stimulus that wins a bottleneck competition against the primary task by its own salience rather than the agent's intent, imposing a performance cost plus recovery time.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:distraction", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "RELATION_SUBSUMPTION", "kind": "INTERPRETIVE_BRIDGE", "normalized_key": "lead_support_pair_is_primary_secondary_attention_relation", "predicate": "A lead/support channel pair instantiates primary-target and secondary-stimulus attentional roles.", "rationale": "SSD and one full DNF branch pass after the emitted atomic qualifier. An arbitrary distraction need not involve communications, but the general bridge types a designated lead/support channel pair into the candidate's primary/secondary attentional roles. The bridge is general because designated lead and subordinate support roles correspond to primary and secondary receiver-attention targets regardless of this edge."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "distraction"}, {"kind": "INTERPRETIVE_BRIDGE", "value": "A lead/support channel pair instantiates primary-target and secondary-stimulus attentional roles."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "distraction", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P072-C14-U1", "why_it_fits": "Distraction directly supplies attention displacement; one general relation-subsumption bridge supplies the communication-role typing."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "If the channel signal honestly communicates commercial provenance, no authority overclaim occurs and the exact candidate is absent.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Native-advertising confusion", "one_liner": "Diagnose a media artifact by splitting its content from its channel signal, so the failure becomes a decoupling — editorial-coded layout asserting journalistic provenance over commercially-incentivized content — and credibility tracks the signal, not the disclosure label.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:native_advertising_confusion", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "native_advertising_confusion"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "native_advertising_confusion", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P072-C14-U2", "why_it_fits": "The candidate directly entails a support signal exceeding its proper subordinate authority by borrowing editorial provenance."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "An arbitrary primary task and distractor are not communication channels, but the general bridge supplies exactly that type relation for a lead/support pair.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_BRIDGE", "name": "Distraction", "one_liner": "The involuntary capture of an agent's scarce attention by a salient secondary stimulus that wins a bottleneck competition against the primary task by its own salience rather than the agent's intent, imposing a performance cost plus recovery time.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:distraction", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "RELATION_SUBSUMPTION", "kind": "INTERPRETIVE_BRIDGE", "normalized_key": "lead_support_pair_is_primary_secondary_attention_relation", "predicate": "A lead/support channel pair instantiates primary-target and secondary-stimulus attentional roles.", "rationale": "SSD and one full DNF branch pass after the emitted atomic qualifier. An arbitrary primary task and distractor are not communication channels, but the general bridge supplies exactly that type relation for a lead/support pair. The bridge applies across communication settings because designated lead and subordinate support are primary and secondary receiver-attention roles."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "distraction"}, {"kind": "INTERPRETIVE_BRIDGE", "value": "A lead/support channel pair instantiates primary-target and secondary-stimulus attentional roles."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "distraction", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P072-C14-U3", "why_it_fits": "Distraction directly supplies salience rivalry; one general relation-subsumption bridge types the roles as lead and support channels."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "If the layout and provenance cues leave the content plainly commercial, the interpretive-frame transfer fails and the candidate is absent.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Native-advertising confusion", "one_liner": "Diagnose a media artifact by splitting its content from its channel signal, so the failure becomes a decoupling — editorial-coded layout asserting journalistic provenance over commercially-incentivized content — and credibility tracks the signal, not the disclosure label.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:native_advertising_confusion", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "native_advertising_confusion"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "native_advertising_confusion", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P072-C14-U4", "why_it_fits": "Every instance directly combines lead content with an accompanying signal that changes its interpretive provenance frame."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Support channels may distract, overclaim, compete with, or reframe the lead.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Timing is one of the four mandatory deference axes.", "role_mapping": "Timing difference -> support pause/fill relation; altered meaning -> figure-ground result.", "slug": "lead_and_support_hierarchy", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b038_a04_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Support that arrives too early spoils, too late fails, and at the wrong tempo creates perceived contradiction. In this condition set, the requirement is: Relative timing among channels changes which content is foregrounded or how the ensemble is interpreted.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Timing differences alter meaning."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Lead-and-Support Hierarchy", "one_liner": "When multiple simultaneous channels carry related content, one channel takes the lead while the others provide coordinated, structurally subordinate support that actively defers to it in prominence, timing, and register, producing a figure-ground hierarchy across the channels.", "page_ref": "prime:lead_and_support_hierarchy", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Timing difference -> support pause/fill relation; altered meaning -> figure-ground result.", "slug": "lead_and_support_hierarchy", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Timing is one of the four mandatory deference axes."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Relative timing among channels changes which content is foregrounded or how the ensemble is interpreted.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Register is a mandatory deference axis preventing support from competing with the lead.", "role_mapping": "Register cue -> deference apparatus; authority cue -> lead/support role.", "slug": "lead_and_support_hierarchy", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b038_a04_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Tone, modality, formality, volume, density, visual weight, or sensory intensity can make support seem more authoritative than intended. In this condition set, the requirement is: Register differences among channels communicate authority and subordination.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Register differences carry authority cues."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Lead-and-Support Hierarchy", "one_liner": "When multiple simultaneous channels carry related content, one channel takes the lead while the others provide coordinated, structurally subordinate support that actively defers to it in prominence, timing, and register, producing a figure-ground hierarchy across the channels.", "page_ref": "prime:lead_and_support_hierarchy", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Register cue -> deference apparatus; authority cue -> lead/support role.", "slug": "lead_and_support_hierarchy", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Register is a mandatory deference axis preventing support from competing with the lead."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Register differences among channels communicate authority and subordination.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact contrast with static hierarchy allows the lead to hand off mid-stream while the ensemble retains one lead.", "role_mapping": "Support takeover -> lead handoff; preserved hierarchy -> single foreground.", "slug": "lead_and_support_hierarchy", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b038_a04_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Safety alerts, accessibility channels, red-team objections, or mode-control signals may require explicit exception triggers. In this condition set, the requirement is: The lead role may hand off to a normally subordinate channel while preserving a single foreground.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A normally subordinate channel must sometimes take over."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Lead-and-Support Hierarchy", "one_liner": "When multiple simultaneous channels carry related content, one channel takes the lead while the others provide coordinated, structurally subordinate support that actively defers to it in prominence, timing, and register, producing a figure-ground hierarchy across the channels.", "page_ref": "prime:lead_and_support_hierarchy", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Support takeover -> lead handoff; preserved hierarchy -> single foreground.", "slug": "lead_and_support_hierarchy", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact contrast with static hierarchy allows the lead to hand off mid-stream while the ensemble retains one lead."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The lead role may hand off to a normally subordinate channel while preserving a single foreground.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 38, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-038", "ledger_sha256": "9eac1cd431cdfd74bfc850fd9813997b6fcb59dca9656454602e305650a3bdcf"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Leakage Path Containment and Recapture", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:leakage_path_containment_and_recapture", "slug": "leakage_path_containment_and_recapture"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 7 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 7}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A quantity that should remain within a defined container, channel, population, process, jurisdiction, account, network, or custody boundary exits through unintended paths. The system may believe it has containment because a formal boundary exists, but hidden interfaces, gradients, bypasses, exceptions, weak monitoring, or misaligned incentives convert the boundary into a porous or lossy surface.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A quantity that should remain within a defined container, channel, population, process, jurisdiction, account, network, or custody boundary exits through unintended paths. The system may believe it has containment because a formal boundary exists, but hidden interfaces, gradients, bypasses, exceptions, weak monitoring, or misaligned incentives convert the boundary into a porous or lossy surface."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact relation begins with a bounded quantity, containment boundary, and unintended exit.", "role_mapping": "Resource or risk -> constrained quantity; boundary -> containment design; unauthorized exit -> leakage.", "slug": "escape_and_leakage", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b038_a05_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A resource, substance, signal, risk, obligation, cost, contaminant, secret, budget, or population must remain inside a defined boundary or authorized flow path. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A resource, substance, signal, risk, obligation, cost, contaminant, secret, budget, or population must remain inside a defined boundary or authorized flow path."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Escape and Leakage", "one_liner": "Constrained quantities exit through unintended pathways.", "page_ref": "prime:escape_and_leakage", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Resource or risk -> constrained quantity; boundary -> containment design; unauthorized exit -> leakage.", "slug": "escape_and_leakage", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact relation begins with a bounded quantity, containment boundary, and unintended exit."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A constrained quantity must remain inside a defined boundary or authorized path but exits elsewhere.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Unintended pathways not explicitly managed are mandatory.", "role_mapping": "Multiple paths -> boundary geometry; overlooked route -> leakage pathway.", "slug": "escape_and_leakage", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b038_a05_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The quantity can move through multiple physical, informational, financial, legal, social, or procedural paths, some of which are not explicitly modeled. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The quantity can move through multiple physical, informational, financial, legal, social, or procedural paths, some of which are not explicitly modeled."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Escape and Leakage", "one_liner": "Constrained quantities exit through unintended pathways.", "page_ref": "prime:escape_and_leakage", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Multiple paths -> boundary geometry; overlooked route -> leakage pathway.", "slug": "escape_and_leakage", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Unintended pathways not explicitly managed are mandatory."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The quantity can travel through overlooked physical, informational, financial, legal, social, or procedural pathways.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Actual measurable exit with system loss, not mere permeability, is required.", "role_mapping": "Expected containment -> designed boundary; divergence -> actual escape and loss.", "slug": "escape_and_leakage", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b038_a05_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Actual stock, exposure, loss, or downstream harm diverges from expected containment even though formal controls appear to be in place. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Actual stock, exposure, loss, or downstream harm diverges from expected containment even though formal controls appear to be in place."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Escape and Leakage", "one_liner": "Constrained quantities exit through unintended pathways.", "page_ref": "prime:escape_and_leakage", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Expected containment -> designed boundary; divergence -> actual escape and loss.", "slug": "escape_and_leakage", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Actual measurable exit with system loss, not mere permeability, is required."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Measured stock, exposure, loss, or harm diverges from expected containment because actual escape occurs.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P072-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail a control over authorized or intended crossings, not merely the existence of a boundary.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A formal boundary control governs intended crossings of a defined boundary.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must identify leakage or an unintended exit across the controlled boundary.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The same boundary permits unintended exits through other paths.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail an observability failure specific to leakage paths.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The boundary-control system cannot detect the unintended exits.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Boundary controls regulate intended crossings but cannot detect unintended exits.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Formal crossing controls are blind to leakage paths.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P072-C15-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P072-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail a control over authorized or intended crossings.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A formal boundary control governs intended crossings of a defined boundary.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must identify leakage or an unintended exit across the controlled boundary.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The same boundary permits unintended exits through other paths.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail a diagnostic or causal-account failure specific to leakage.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The boundary-control system cannot explain the mechanism or path of the unintended exits.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Boundary controls regulate intended crossings but cannot explain unintended exits.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Formal crossing controls cannot account for leakage paths.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P072-C15-U2"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P072-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail a control over authorized or intended crossings.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A formal boundary control governs intended crossings of a defined boundary.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must identify leakage or an unintended exit across the controlled boundary.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The same boundary permits unintended exits through other paths.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail failure of post-exit repair or recapture, not only failure to detect the exit or failure to prevent a future one.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The boundary-control system cannot remediate or recapture the unintended exits after they occur.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Boundary controls regulate intended crossings but cannot repair unintended exits.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Formal crossing controls cannot remediate or recapture leakage after exit.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P072-C15-U3"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Containment can monitor and stop unintended exits; inability to detect or repair them is not universal.", "slug": "containment"}], "residual_id": "r:leakage_path_containment_and_recapture:b038_a05_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b038_a05_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Existing boundary controls regulate intended crossings but do not detect, explain, or repair unintended exits. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Existing boundary controls regulate intended crossings but do not detect, explain, or repair unintended exits."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 3, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 3}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Containment can monitor and stop unintended exits; inability to detect or repair them is not universal.", "slug": "containment"}], "normalized_requirement": "Boundary controls govern intended crossings but cannot detect, explain, or repair unintended exits.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 3 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Boundary controls govern intended crossings but cannot detect, explain, or repair unintended exits.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Differential pressure plus pathway permeability produces the actual exit.", "role_mapping": "Pressure or incentive -> differential driver; path -> permeability; escape -> cross-boundary flow.", "slug": "escape_and_leakage", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b038_a05_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: There are pressure gradients, incentives, adversarial search, entropy, error, or emergency workarounds that make escape likely. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["There are pressure gradients, incentives, adversarial search, entropy, error, or emergency workarounds that make escape likely."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Escape and Leakage", "one_liner": "Constrained quantities exit through unintended pathways.", "page_ref": "prime:escape_and_leakage", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Pressure or incentive -> differential driver; path -> permeability; escape -> cross-boundary flow.", "slug": "escape_and_leakage", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Differential pressure plus pathway permeability produces the actual exit."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A pressure gradient, incentive, adversarial search, entropy, error, or workaround drives flow across the boundary.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P073-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"], ["O1", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail cumulative leakage or loss rather than one isolated departure.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Losses from an intended containment boundary accumulate over time.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail a slow rate that makes accumulated loss accepted as normal rather than corrected.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Slow accumulation makes the continuing losses become normalized.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail a fast loss rate that causally overwhelms corrective response.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Rapid accumulation exceeds the capacity of post hoc correction.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Containment losses accumulate either slowly enough to become normalized or rapidly enough to overwhelm post hoc correction.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Accumulating leakage evades response through normalization or correction overload.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P073-C01-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Leakage can remain stable, visible, and within a correctable range.", "slug": "escape_and_leakage"}], "residual_id": "r:leakage_path_containment_and_recapture:b038_a05_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b038_a05_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Losses accumulate slowly enough to be normalized or quickly enough to overwhelm post hoc correction. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Losses accumulate slowly enough to be normalized or quickly enough to overwhelm post hoc correction."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A control may surface through an audit shock without rapid overload, but its defining accumulated normalized deviations still complete O1 plus O2.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Hazard-Control Decay", "one_liner": "Track the widening gap between what a safety control's paperwork says it does and what it actually does under hazard, so that a control certified sound by audit can be found silently unprotective before it fails.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:hazard_control_decay", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "hazard_control_decay"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "hazard_control_decay", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P073-C01-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires cumulative control loss and absorption of each deviation into normal practice, completing the slow-normalization DNF branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A fully staffed tracing program can still trail a fast pathogen; that preserves the candidate and confirms, rather than falsifies, correction-capacity overload.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Contact-Tracing Delay", "one_liner": "Frame outbreak containment as a race on the contact graph: once the time to find and isolate a case's contacts exceeds the pathogen's generation interval, tracing only documents the chain, and more staff cannot restore containment.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:contact_tracing_delay", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "contact_tracing_delay"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "contact_tracing_delay", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P073-C01-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every threshold-crossed tracing-delay instance entails accumulating containment escape whose rate exceeds corrective response."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Losses accumulate slowly enough to normalize or rapidly enough to overwhelm correction.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact relation requires system loss but not any particular secondary-harm class.", "slug": "escape_and_leakage"}], "residual_id": "r:leakage_path_containment_and_recapture:b038_a05_c7", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b038_a05_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Leakage can create secondary harm: contamination, data exposure, fraud, risk migration, benefit diversion, accountability loss, or cascading failure. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Leakage can create secondary harm: contamination, data exposure, fraud, risk migration, benefit diversion, accountability loss, or cascading failure."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact relation requires system loss but not any particular secondary-harm class.", "slug": "escape_and_leakage"}], "normalized_requirement": "Leakage produces secondary contamination, exposure, fraud, migrated risk, diversion, accountability loss, or cascade.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Leakage produces secondary contamination, exposure, fraud, migrated risk, diversion, accountability loss, or cascade.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The organization needs to distinguish acceptable residual permeability from uncontrolled leakage.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: The organization needs to distinguish acceptable residual permeability from uncontrolled leakage. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The organization needs to distinguish acceptable residual permeability from uncontrolled leakage."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 8, "text": "The organization needs to distinguish acceptable residual permeability from uncontrolled leakage."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 38, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-038", "ledger_sha256": "9eac1cd431cdfd74bfc850fd9813997b6fcb59dca9656454602e305650a3bdcf"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Leakage-Resistant Validation Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:leakage_resistant_validation_design", "slug": "leakage_resistant_validation_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 7, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 2, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 2, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 5, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 9 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 2 of 7 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 9}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system estimates, tunes, validates, benchmarks, or calibrates a decision rule using information that would not have been available when the rule must act. The contamination may enter through labels, post-event fields, future aggregates, duplicated entities, look-ahead joins, preprocessing fit on all data, repeated benchmark access, feedback from a supposedly sealed holdout, or manual knowledge of evaluation cases. Because the leak usually improves metrics, teams may interpret the contaminated result as genuine skill, deploy the rule, and only then discover a gap between measured performance and operational performance.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system estimates, tunes, validates, benchmarks, or calibrates a decision rule using information that would not have been available when the rule must act. The contamination may enter through labels, post-event fields, future aggregates, duplicated entities, look-ahead joins, preprocessing fit on all data, repeated benchmark access, feedback from a supposedly sealed holdout, or manual knowledge of evaluation cases. Because the leak usually improves metrics, teams may interpret the contaminated result as genuine skill, deploy the rule, and only then discover a gap between measured performance and operational performance."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The canonical head factors every listed channel into the exact forbidden-information firewall breach.", "role_mapping": "Decision moment -> entitlement boundary; future/target/test information -> forbidden data; preprocessing, partition, benchmark, or reconstruction -> crossing channel.", "slug": "data_leakage", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b038_a06_leak_core", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A dataset mixes fields created before, during, and after the decision event. A model or rule predicts an outcome using features derived from that outcome or from processes that occur after it. Training, tuning, calibration, feature selection, imputation, normalization, or threshold setting can observe validation or test material. Cases are split randomly even though entity, time, household, document, product, location, or episode linkage creates near-duplicates across partitions. A public benchmark, test suite, rubric, or answer key has been repeatedly used during development. Retrospective data is cleaner, richer, later-corrected, or differently timestamped than the information available at deployment. A team cannot reconstruct which inputs were known at the moment the operational decision had to be made. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A dataset mixes fields created before, during, and after the decision event.", "A model or rule predicts an outcome using features derived from that outcome or from processes that occur after it.", "Training, tuning, calibration, feature selection, imputation, normalization, or threshold setting can observe validation or test material.", "Cases are split randomly even though entity, time, household, document, product, location, or episode linkage creates near-duplicates across partitions.", "A public benchmark, test suite, rubric, or answer key has been repeatedly used during development.", "Retrospective data is cleaner, richer, later-corrected, or differently timestamped than the information available at deployment.", "A team cannot reconstruct which inputs were known at the moment the operational decision had to be made."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Data Leakage", "one_liner": "Information that should have been unavailable at decision time crosses the firewall into calibration, inflating measured performance until deployment exposes the gap.", "page_ref": "prime:data_leakage", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Decision moment -> entitlement boundary; future/target/test information -> forbidden data; preprocessing, partition, benchmark, or reconstruction -> crossing channel.", "slug": "data_leakage", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The canonical head factors every listed channel into the exact forbidden-information firewall breach."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Information unavailable to the real decision process crosses a temporal or evaluation firewall into training, tuning, validation, or reconstruction.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P073-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must concern a single dataset whose fields refer to one decision event.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "One dataset contains fields indexed to the same decision event.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail inclusion of pre-decision fields.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The dataset contains fields created before the decision event.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail inclusion of fields generated while the decision occurs.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The dataset contains fields created during the decision event.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail inclusion of post-decision fields in the same dataset.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The dataset contains fields created after the decision event.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "One dataset combines fields created before, during, and after the same indexed decision event.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A dataset mixes fields from all three phases of a decision event.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P073-C02-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Data leakage may instead occur through test-set exposure, social evaluator leakage, or preprocessing without mixed event-time fields.", "slug": "data_leakage"}], "residual_id": "r:leakage_resistant_validation_design:b038_a06_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b038_a06_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A dataset mixes fields created before, during, and after the decision event. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A dataset mixes fields created before, during, and after the decision event."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Data leakage may instead occur through test-set exposure, social evaluator leakage, or preprocessing without mixed event-time fields.", "slug": "data_leakage"}], "normalized_requirement": "One dataset combines fields created before, during, and after the indexed decision event.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "One dataset combines fields created before, during, and after the indexed decision event.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The canonical head factors every listed channel into the exact forbidden-information firewall breach.", "role_mapping": "Decision moment -> entitlement boundary; future/target/test information -> forbidden data; preprocessing, partition, benchmark, or reconstruction -> crossing channel.", "slug": "data_leakage", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b038_a06_leak_core", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A dataset mixes fields created before, during, and after the decision event. A model or rule predicts an outcome using features derived from that outcome or from processes that occur after it. Training, tuning, calibration, feature selection, imputation, normalization, or threshold setting can observe validation or test material. Cases are split randomly even though entity, time, household, document, product, location, or episode linkage creates near-duplicates across partitions. A public benchmark, test suite, rubric, or answer key has been repeatedly used during development. Retrospective data is cleaner, richer, later-corrected, or differently timestamped than the information available at deployment. A team cannot reconstruct which inputs were known at the moment the operational decision had to be made. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A dataset mixes fields created before, during, and after the decision event.", "A model or rule predicts an outcome using features derived from that outcome or from processes that occur after it.", "Training, tuning, calibration, feature selection, imputation, normalization, or threshold setting can observe validation or test material.", "Cases are split randomly even though entity, time, household, document, product, location, or episode linkage creates near-duplicates across partitions.", "A public benchmark, test suite, rubric, or answer key has been repeatedly used during development.", "Retrospective data is cleaner, richer, later-corrected, or differently timestamped than the information available at deployment.", "A team cannot reconstruct which inputs were known at the moment the operational decision had to be made."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Data Leakage", "one_liner": "Information that should have been unavailable at decision time crosses the firewall into calibration, inflating measured performance until deployment exposes the gap.", "page_ref": "prime:data_leakage", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Decision moment -> entitlement boundary; future/target/test information -> forbidden data; preprocessing, partition, benchmark, or reconstruction -> crossing channel.", "slug": "data_leakage", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The canonical head factors every listed channel into the exact forbidden-information firewall breach."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Information unavailable to the real decision process crosses a temporal or evaluation firewall into training, tuning, validation, or reconstruction.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P073-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"], ["O1", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must include a predictor, its input feature, and the predicted target.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A model or rule uses a feature to predict a target outcome.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail target-to-feature derivation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The feature is derived from the target outcome itself.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail post-outcome generation of the feature.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The feature is derived from a process that occurs after the target outcome.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "A predictor uses a feature derived from its target outcome or from a process occurring after that outcome.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Prediction uses target-derived or post-outcome information.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P073-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Direct target leakage is one channel; the prime also includes upstream, temporal, and social channels.", "slug": "data_leakage"}], "residual_id": "r:leakage_resistant_validation_design:b038_a06_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b038_a06_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A model or rule predicts an outcome using features derived from that outcome or from processes that occur after it. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A model or rule predicts an outcome using features derived from that outcome or from processes that occur after it."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Without the timing predicate, an imputer may use held-out measurements collected before the outcome; the guard excludes exactly that complete counterexample.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Imputation Leakage", "one_liner": "The model-evaluation failure in which a missing-value repair step is fit across the train/test boundary, so its parameters encode facts about the held-out rows — inflating performance that survives into the test metric, because imputation, mentally filed as data cleaning, is really a model.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:imputation_leakage", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O3"], "guard_type": "TIMING_BINDING", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "imputation_uses_post_outcome_heldout_data", "predicate": "The held-out values used to fit the imputer were generated after the predicted target outcome.", "rationale": "SSD and one complete DNF branch pass after the emitted atomic guard. Without the timing predicate, an imputer may use held-out measurements collected before the outcome; the guard excludes exactly that complete counterexample. The guard is candidate-anchored, sufficient, and introduces no second fact."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "imputation_leakage"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The held-out values used to fit the imputer were generated after the predicted target outcome."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "imputation_leakage", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P073-C03-U1", "why_it_fits": "The candidate supplies the prediction and feature channel, while one atomic timing relation completes the post-outcome DNF branch."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A predictor uses target-derived or post-outcome features.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The canonical head factors every listed channel into the exact forbidden-information firewall breach.", "role_mapping": "Decision moment -> entitlement boundary; future/target/test information -> forbidden data; preprocessing, partition, benchmark, or reconstruction -> crossing channel.", "slug": "data_leakage", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b038_a06_leak_core", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A dataset mixes fields created before, during, and after the decision event. A model or rule predicts an outcome using features derived from that outcome or from processes that occur after it. Training, tuning, calibration, feature selection, imputation, normalization, or threshold setting can observe validation or test material. Cases are split randomly even though entity, time, household, document, product, location, or episode linkage creates near-duplicates across partitions. A public benchmark, test suite, rubric, or answer key has been repeatedly used during development. Retrospective data is cleaner, richer, later-corrected, or differently timestamped than the information available at deployment. A team cannot reconstruct which inputs were known at the moment the operational decision had to be made. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A dataset mixes fields created before, during, and after the decision event.", "A model or rule predicts an outcome using features derived from that outcome or from processes that occur after it.", "Training, tuning, calibration, feature selection, imputation, normalization, or threshold setting can observe validation or test material.", "Cases are split randomly even though entity, time, household, document, product, location, or episode linkage creates near-duplicates across partitions.", "A public benchmark, test suite, rubric, or answer key has been repeatedly used during development.", "Retrospective data is cleaner, richer, later-corrected, or differently timestamped than the information available at deployment.", "A team cannot reconstruct which inputs were known at the moment the operational decision had to be made."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Data Leakage", "one_liner": "Information that should have been unavailable at decision time crosses the firewall into calibration, inflating measured performance until deployment exposes the gap.", "page_ref": "prime:data_leakage", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Decision moment -> entitlement boundary; future/target/test information -> forbidden data; preprocessing, partition, benchmark, or reconstruction -> crossing channel.", "slug": "data_leakage", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The canonical head factors every listed channel into the exact forbidden-information firewall breach."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Information unavailable to the real decision process crosses a temporal or evaluation firewall into training, tuning, validation, or reconstruction.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P073-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must concern a choice that can affect the developed model or decision rule.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A training, tuning, calibration, or preprocessing choice is made during model development.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must identify validation or test material rather than ordinary inputs of the affected development operation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Material belongs to a validation or test set.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve possible development-to-evaluation information flow without requiring that it has already occurred.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The development-stage choice can observe that evaluation material.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "A model-development or preprocessing choice can observe validation or test material.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Development-stage choices can observe validation or test material.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P073-C04-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Validation can be properly isolated and does not entail evaluator information entering training.", "slug": "validation"}], "residual_id": "r:leakage_resistant_validation_design:b038_a06_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b038_a06_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Training, tuning, calibration, feature selection, imputation, normalization, or threshold setting can observe validation or test material. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Training, tuning, calibration, feature selection, imputation, normalization, or threshold setting can observe validation or test material."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "An imputer fitted only on training rows would falsify observation of evaluation material, but that is expressly outside imputation leakage.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Imputation Leakage", "one_liner": "The model-evaluation failure in which a missing-value repair step is fit across the train/test boundary, so its parameters encode facts about the held-out rows — inflating performance that survives into the test metric, because imputation, mentally filed as data cleaning, is really a model.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:imputation_leakage", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "imputation_leakage"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "imputation_leakage", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P073-C04-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record directly entails a development preprocessing choice observing held-out evaluation data."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Training or preprocessing choices can observe validation or test material.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The canonical head factors every listed channel into the exact forbidden-information firewall breach.", "role_mapping": "Decision moment -> entitlement boundary; future/target/test information -> forbidden data; preprocessing, partition, benchmark, or reconstruction -> crossing channel.", "slug": "data_leakage", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b038_a06_leak_core", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A dataset mixes fields created before, during, and after the decision event. A model or rule predicts an outcome using features derived from that outcome or from processes that occur after it. Training, tuning, calibration, feature selection, imputation, normalization, or threshold setting can observe validation or test material. Cases are split randomly even though entity, time, household, document, product, location, or episode linkage creates near-duplicates across partitions. A public benchmark, test suite, rubric, or answer key has been repeatedly used during development. Retrospective data is cleaner, richer, later-corrected, or differently timestamped than the information available at deployment. A team cannot reconstruct which inputs were known at the moment the operational decision had to be made. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A dataset mixes fields created before, during, and after the decision event.", "A model or rule predicts an outcome using features derived from that outcome or from processes that occur after it.", "Training, tuning, calibration, feature selection, imputation, normalization, or threshold setting can observe validation or test material.", "Cases are split randomly even though entity, time, household, document, product, location, or episode linkage creates near-duplicates across partitions.", "A public benchmark, test suite, rubric, or answer key has been repeatedly used during development.", "Retrospective data is cleaner, richer, later-corrected, or differently timestamped than the information available at deployment.", "A team cannot reconstruct which inputs were known at the moment the operational decision had to be made."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Data Leakage", "one_liner": "Information that should have been unavailable at decision time crosses the firewall into calibration, inflating measured performance until deployment exposes the gap.", "page_ref": "prime:data_leakage", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Decision moment -> entitlement boundary; future/target/test information -> forbidden data; preprocessing, partition, benchmark, or reconstruction -> crossing channel.", "slug": "data_leakage", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The canonical head factors every listed channel into the exact forbidden-information firewall breach."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Information unavailable to the real decision process crosses a temporal or evaluation firewall into training, tuning, validation, or reconstruction.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P073-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail random case-level splitting across a partition used for evaluation.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Cases are assigned randomly to separate development and evaluation partitions.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must identify dependence or near-duplication among cases.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Some cases are linked or near-duplicates under a shared entity, episode, location, time, or comparable cluster.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail actual cross-partition placement rather than merely possible linkage.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "At least one linked case group has members on both sides of the partition.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve partitioning-to-leakage direction.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The random split's failure to respect linkage produces the cross-partition duplication.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Random case splitting places linked or near-duplicate cases on both sides of a partition.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A random split leaks linked cases across evaluation partitions.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P073-C05-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Leakage need not arise from partition linkage or near duplicates.", "slug": "data_leakage"}], "residual_id": "r:leakage_resistant_validation_design:b038_a06_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b038_a06_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Cases are split randomly even though entity, time, household, document, product, location, or episode linkage creates near-duplicates across partitions. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Cases are split randomly even though entity, time, household, document, product, location, or episode linkage creates near-duplicates across partitions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Leakage need not arise from partition linkage or near duplicates.", "slug": "data_leakage"}], "normalized_requirement": "Random splitting leaves linked or near-duplicate entities, episodes, or locations on both sides of the partition.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Random splitting leaves linked or near-duplicate entities, episodes, or locations on both sides of the partition.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B5", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The canonical head factors every listed channel into the exact forbidden-information firewall breach.", "role_mapping": "Decision moment -> entitlement boundary; future/target/test information -> forbidden data; preprocessing, partition, benchmark, or reconstruction -> crossing channel.", "slug": "data_leakage", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b038_a06_leak_core", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A dataset mixes fields created before, during, and after the decision event. A model or rule predicts an outcome using features derived from that outcome or from processes that occur after it. Training, tuning, calibration, feature selection, imputation, normalization, or threshold setting can observe validation or test material. Cases are split randomly even though entity, time, household, document, product, location, or episode linkage creates near-duplicates across partitions. A public benchmark, test suite, rubric, or answer key has been repeatedly used during development. Retrospective data is cleaner, richer, later-corrected, or differently timestamped than the information available at deployment. A team cannot reconstruct which inputs were known at the moment the operational decision had to be made. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A dataset mixes fields created before, during, and after the decision event.", "A model or rule predicts an outcome using features derived from that outcome or from processes that occur after it.", "Training, tuning, calibration, feature selection, imputation, normalization, or threshold setting can observe validation or test material.", "Cases are split randomly even though entity, time, household, document, product, location, or episode linkage creates near-duplicates across partitions.", "A public benchmark, test suite, rubric, or answer key has been repeatedly used during development.", "Retrospective data is cleaner, richer, later-corrected, or differently timestamped than the information available at deployment.", "A team cannot reconstruct which inputs were known at the moment the operational decision had to be made."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Data Leakage", "one_liner": "Information that should have been unavailable at decision time crosses the firewall into calibration, inflating measured performance until deployment exposes the gap.", "page_ref": "prime:data_leakage", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Decision moment -> entitlement boundary; future/target/test information -> forbidden data; preprocessing, partition, benchmark, or reconstruction -> crossing channel.", "slug": "data_leakage", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The canonical head factors every listed channel into the exact forbidden-information firewall breach."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Information unavailable to the real decision process crosses a temporal or evaluation firewall into training, tuning, validation, or reconstruction.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P073-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must identify publicly accessible benchmark, test, scoring, or answer material.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A public artifact is used to evaluate system performance or answers.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require exposure before development is complete, not only final evaluation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The evaluation artifact is used during development of the system.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail repeated consultation or adaptation rather than a single sealed evaluation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The development process uses the evaluation artifact repeatedly.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}], "predicate": "Public evaluation material is repeatedly used during system development.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Development repeatedly consults public evaluation material.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P073-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Validation material can remain genuinely held out and need not be repeatedly used during development.", "slug": "validation"}], "residual_id": "r:leakage_resistant_validation_design:b038_a06_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b038_a06_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A public benchmark, test suite, rubric, or answer key has been repeatedly used during development. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A public benchmark, test suite, rubric, or answer key has been repeatedly used during development."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Validation material can remain genuinely held out and need not be repeatedly used during development.", "slug": "validation"}], "normalized_requirement": "A public benchmark, test suite, rubric, or answer key has been repeatedly consulted during development.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A public benchmark, test suite, rubric, or answer key has been repeatedly consulted during development.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 5", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B6", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The canonical head factors every listed channel into the exact forbidden-information firewall breach.", "role_mapping": "Decision moment -> entitlement boundary; future/target/test information -> forbidden data; preprocessing, partition, benchmark, or reconstruction -> crossing channel.", "slug": "data_leakage", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b038_a06_leak_core", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A dataset mixes fields created before, during, and after the decision event. A model or rule predicts an outcome using features derived from that outcome or from processes that occur after it. Training, tuning, calibration, feature selection, imputation, normalization, or threshold setting can observe validation or test material. Cases are split randomly even though entity, time, household, document, product, location, or episode linkage creates near-duplicates across partitions. A public benchmark, test suite, rubric, or answer key has been repeatedly used during development. Retrospective data is cleaner, richer, later-corrected, or differently timestamped than the information available at deployment. A team cannot reconstruct which inputs were known at the moment the operational decision had to be made. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A dataset mixes fields created before, during, and after the decision event.", "A model or rule predicts an outcome using features derived from that outcome or from processes that occur after it.", "Training, tuning, calibration, feature selection, imputation, normalization, or threshold setting can observe validation or test material.", "Cases are split randomly even though entity, time, household, document, product, location, or episode linkage creates near-duplicates across partitions.", "A public benchmark, test suite, rubric, or answer key has been repeatedly used during development.", "Retrospective data is cleaner, richer, later-corrected, or differently timestamped than the information available at deployment.", "A team cannot reconstruct which inputs were known at the moment the operational decision had to be made."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Data Leakage", "one_liner": "Information that should have been unavailable at decision time crosses the firewall into calibration, inflating measured performance until deployment exposes the gap.", "page_ref": "prime:data_leakage", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Decision moment -> entitlement boundary; future/target/test information -> forbidden data; preprocessing, partition, benchmark, or reconstruction -> crossing channel.", "slug": "data_leakage", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The canonical head factors every listed channel into the exact forbidden-information firewall breach."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Information unavailable to the real decision process crosses a temporal or evaluation firewall into training, tuning, validation, or reconstruction.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The atom supplies an earlier indexed state, later evidence, undisclosed temporal-boundary crossing, and a changed reconstruction.", "role_mapping": "Deployment decision time -> earlier t; corrected retrospective data -> later evidence; evaluation -> reconstructed prior state.", "slug": "past_state_contamination", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b038_a06_c6a", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Retrospective data is cleaner, richer, later-corrected, or differently timestamped than the information available at deployment. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Retrospective data is cleaner, richer, later-corrected, or differently timestamped than the information available at deployment."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Past-State Contamination", "one_liner": "Later information enters a reconstruction, estimate, or evaluation presented as valid for an earlier time, erasing the boundary between what was knowable then and what became available only afterward.", "page_ref": "prime:past_state_contamination", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Deployment decision time -> earlier t; corrected retrospective data -> later evidence; evaluation -> reconstructed prior state.", "slug": "past_state_contamination", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The atom supplies an earlier indexed state, later evidence, undisclosed temporal-boundary crossing, and a changed reconstruction."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Later-corrected or retrospectively enriched information is used in an artifact presented as valid for an earlier decision time.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P073-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must include retrospective information used to represent or assess the same task.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A retrospective dataset represents cases from an operational decision task.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must identify the deployment-time information baseline.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "An input stream was available when the corresponding operational decisions had to be made.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail greater cleanliness in retrospective data.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The retrospective dataset is systematically cleaner than the deployment-time inputs.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail greater information richness retrospectively.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The retrospective dataset is systematically richer than the deployment-time inputs.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail later corrections unavailable at decision time.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The retrospective dataset contains corrections made only after the operational decision moment.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail an operationally material timestamp mismatch.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The retrospective dataset uses timestamps that materially misrepresent information availability at deployment.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "Retrospective data differs favorably from deployment-time inputs by being cleaner, richer, later-corrected, or operationally differently timestamped.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Retrospective inputs exceed or misrepresent deployment-time information.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P073-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Leakage can occur even when retrospective and deployment data have equal cleanliness and richness.", "slug": "data_leakage"}], "residual_id": "r:leakage_resistant_validation_design:b038_a06_c6b", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b038_a06_c6b", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Retrospective data is cleaner, richer, later-corrected, or differently timestamped than the information available at deployment. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Retrospective data is cleaner, richer, later-corrected, or differently timestamped than the information available at deployment."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Leakage can occur even when retrospective and deployment data have equal cleanliness and richness.", "slug": "data_leakage"}], "normalized_requirement": "Retrospective data is systematically cleaner or richer than the deployment-time input stream.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Retrospective data is systematically cleaner or richer than the deployment-time input stream.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 6", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B7", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The canonical head factors every listed channel into the exact forbidden-information firewall breach.", "role_mapping": "Decision moment -> entitlement boundary; future/target/test information -> forbidden data; preprocessing, partition, benchmark, or reconstruction -> crossing channel.", "slug": "data_leakage", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b038_a06_leak_core", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A dataset mixes fields created before, during, and after the decision event. A model or rule predicts an outcome using features derived from that outcome or from processes that occur after it. Training, tuning, calibration, feature selection, imputation, normalization, or threshold setting can observe validation or test material. Cases are split randomly even though entity, time, household, document, product, location, or episode linkage creates near-duplicates across partitions. A public benchmark, test suite, rubric, or answer key has been repeatedly used during development. Retrospective data is cleaner, richer, later-corrected, or differently timestamped than the information available at deployment. A team cannot reconstruct which inputs were known at the moment the operational decision had to be made. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A dataset mixes fields created before, during, and after the decision event.", "A model or rule predicts an outcome using features derived from that outcome or from processes that occur after it.", "Training, tuning, calibration, feature selection, imputation, normalization, or threshold setting can observe validation or test material.", "Cases are split randomly even though entity, time, household, document, product, location, or episode linkage creates near-duplicates across partitions.", "A public benchmark, test suite, rubric, or answer key has been repeatedly used during development.", "Retrospective data is cleaner, richer, later-corrected, or differently timestamped than the information available at deployment.", "A team cannot reconstruct which inputs were known at the moment the operational decision had to be made."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Data Leakage", "one_liner": "Information that should have been unavailable at decision time crosses the firewall into calibration, inflating measured performance until deployment exposes the gap.", "page_ref": "prime:data_leakage", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Decision moment -> entitlement boundary; future/target/test information -> forbidden data; preprocessing, partition, benchmark, or reconstruction -> crossing channel.", "slug": "data_leakage", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The canonical head factors every listed channel into the exact forbidden-information firewall breach."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Information unavailable to the real decision process crosses a temporal or evaluation firewall into training, tuning, validation, or reconstruction.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P073-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must identify the real decision-time boundary rather than a later analytic cutoff.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An operational decision had to be made at a defined moment.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must concern membership in the contemporaneous decision input set.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A definite set of inputs was known or available at that moment.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail inability to recover the decision-time information set.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The responsible team cannot reconstruct which inputs belonged to that set.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "A team cannot reconstruct the set of inputs known at the actual operational decision moment.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "The decision-time information set cannot be reconstructed.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P073-C08-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A leakage event can be fully traceable even though forbidden information crossed the firewall.", "slug": "data_leakage"}], "residual_id": "r:leakage_resistant_validation_design:b038_a06_c7", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b038_a06_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A team cannot reconstruct which inputs were known at the moment the operational decision had to be made. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A team cannot reconstruct which inputs were known at the moment the operational decision had to be made."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A leakage event can be fully traceable even though forbidden information crossed the firewall.", "slug": "data_leakage"}], "normalized_requirement": "The team cannot reconstruct the input set available at the actual operational decision moment.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The team cannot reconstruct the input set available at the actual operational decision moment.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 7", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "DISJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 38, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-038", "ledger_sha256": "9eac1cd431cdfd74bfc850fd9813997b6fcb59dca9656454602e305650a3bdcf"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Least-Privilege Access Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:least_privilege_access_design", "slug": "least_privilege_access_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 5, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 2, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 2, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 2 of 5 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is permission drift. Access is granted because it was easy, inherited, once necessary, politically convenient, or useful during an emergency. Over time, roles accumulate capabilities that no longer match actual work.\n\nThis creates a hidden asymmetry: the system looks normal while actors hold more reach than they need. The cost appears only after a mistake, breach, misuse, leak, conflict of interest, or irreversible action. The pattern is dangerous because excess access often feels harmless until it is used.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Actors have broader access than their current work requires, or access is granted by habit, status, convenience, inherited defaults, emergency precedent, or organizational politics rather than by scoped need."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P073-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must identify a privilege holder and the task that defines legitimate need.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An actor has a legitimate task or scoped work purpose.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail granted reachability, not necessarily actual resource use.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The actor has the capability to access a set of resources.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require task-unrelated access rather than broad but fully necessary access.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "At least one reachable resource is unrelated to the actor's legitimate task.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "A privilege holder can access resources unrelated to its legitimate task.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Granted access extends beyond task-related resources.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P073-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Access control can precisely restrict resources to legitimate tasks and does not entail overbroad reach.", "slug": "access_control"}], "residual_id": "r:least_privilege_access_design:b038_a07_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b038_a07_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A person, role, system account, team, process, or institution can reach resources unrelated to its legitimate task. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A person, role, system account, team, process, or institution can reach resources unrelated to its legitimate task."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A binder restricted to task-related allow-listed fields would falsify O3, but that remediation is not mass assignment.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Mass Assignment", "one_liner": "The web-application vulnerability in which a request-binding layer writes all client-supplied fields directly to a domain object with no allow-list, letting a caller set server-managed attributes like role or owner_id simply by naming them.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:mass_assignment", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "mass_assignment"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "mass_assignment", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P073-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "Field-level write access is a subtype of resource access, and the exact failure requires reach beyond the caller's legitimate writable set."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A producer-side projection returning exactly role-required fields would falsify O3, but that is the prescribed remedy, not the candidate failure.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Excessive Data Exposure", "one_liner": "An API endpoint returns more fields than the caller's role requires, trusting a client-side filter to hide the surplus — but the unfiltered payload is already on the wire, so the surplus must be stripped at the producer via role-scoped projection.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:excessive_data_exposure", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "excessive_data_exposure"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "excessive_data_exposure", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P073-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record directly instantiates task-scoped access extending to unrelated surplus fields."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "An actor can access resources unrelated to its legitimate task.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P073-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must include a privilege grant whose legitimate basis is time-bounded.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Access is granted because of a temporary circumstance.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require termination of the project, emergency, migration, or comparable justification.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The temporary circumstance ends.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail nonrevocation and access persistence beyond the authorization basis.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The granted access remains in force after its temporary justification has ended.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "Access granted for a temporary circumstance remains after that circumstance ends.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Temporary access persists beyond its authorization basis.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P073-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Revocation closure ensures downstream authority is removed and does not entail stale access.", "slug": "revocation_closure"}], "residual_id": "r:least_privilege_access_design:b038_a07_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b038_a07_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Access was granted for a temporary project, emergency, migration, or leadership change but never removed. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Access was granted for a temporary project, emergency, migration, or leadership change but never removed."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Revocation closure ensures downstream authority is removed and does not entail stale access.", "slug": "revocation_closure"}], "normalized_requirement": "Temporary access persists after the project, emergency, migration, or role change ends.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Temporary access persists after the project, emergency, migration, or role change ends.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P073-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the one-actor concentration rather than require coordinated action by many actors.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A single actor is compromised, careless, malicious, or comparably unsafe.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require overbroad privilege rather than merely valuable legitimate access.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The actor's privileges are broader than its legitimate need.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve possible harm without requiring that a harmful event has occurred.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The actor could cause damage through those privileges.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail broad-privilege-to-blast-radius amplification.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The breadth of privilege makes the potential damage disproportionate for one actor.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "One compromised, careless, or malicious actor could cause disproportionate damage because its privileges are too broad.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Broad privilege gives one unsafe actor disproportionate potential blast radius.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P073-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Least privilege minimizes task-unrelated reach and blast radius; broad permission is its inverse.", "slug": "principle_of_least_privilege"}], "residual_id": "r:least_privilege_access_design:b038_a07_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b038_a07_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A single compromised, careless, or malicious actor could create disproportionate damage because privileges are too broad. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A single compromised, careless, or malicious actor could create disproportionate damage because privileges are too broad."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A strict per-source budget would bound one caller's blast radius, but the absence of that budget is constitutive of the candidate.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Rate-Limit Absence", "one_liner": "Diagnose a whole family of endpoint abuses as one defect — a callable action left uncapped whose per-invocation cost to the service far exceeds the attacker's, so no enforced per-source budget separates legitimate demand from adversarial demand driven at machine speed.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:rate_limit_absence", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "rate_limit_absence"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "rate_limit_absence", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P073-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "The candidate directly combines one unsafe source, privilege beyond legitimate demand volume, possible damage, and breadth-caused disproportion."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Without the guard, a false session can be narrowly read-only; broad administrative inheritance excludes that counterexample and makes the blast radius disproportionate.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Authentication Failure", "one_liner": "The breakdown of a system's identity-verification, in which a claim is accepted when it should not be — because the procedure checked too little, the wrong evidence, or evidence an impostor could produce — yielding a session that inherits the real actor's privileges and corrupts every control conditioned on 'who is this?'", "page_ref": "domain_specific:authentication_failure", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2", "O4"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "false_session_inherits_broad_administrative_privileges", "predicate": "The accepted false session inherits broad administrative privileges spanning multiple sensitive controls.", "rationale": "SSD and one complete DNF branch pass after the emitted atomic guard. Without the guard, a false session can be narrowly read-only; broad administrative inheritance excludes that counterexample and makes the blast radius disproportionate. The guard is candidate-anchored, sufficient, and introduces no second fact."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "authentication_failure"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The accepted false session inherits broad administrative privileges spanning multiple sensitive controls."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "authentication_failure", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P073-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "One candidate-anchored privilege-scope fact completes the broadness comparison and its blast-radius consequence."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A sandboxed interpreter can preserve injection while causing negligible reach; the broad-sensitive-authority guard excludes exactly that counterexample.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Injection Weakness", "one_liner": "The software-security failure in which untrusted data crosses into a control channel and a downstream interpreter executes it as command, query, or instruction — a collapse of the data/control boundary that a legitimate, often credential-free, input channel is enough to exploit.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:injection_weakness", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2", "O3", "O4"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "interpreter_has_broad_sensitive_resource_authority", "predicate": "The downstream interpreter executes with broad authority over sensitive resources.", "rationale": "SSD and one complete DNF branch pass after the emitted atomic guard. A sandboxed interpreter can preserve injection while causing negligible reach; the broad-sensitive-authority guard excludes exactly that counterexample. The guard is candidate-anchored, sufficient, and introduces no second fact."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "injection_weakness"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The downstream interpreter executes with broad authority over sensitive resources."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "injection_weakness", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P073-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "The effective-privilege mapping is subtype-preserving: one input source obtains interpreter authority, and one scope predicate makes harm and disproportion necessary."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "One compromised or careless actor has disproportionate blast radius because its privileges are broad.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P073-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must identify information, action, authority, space, control, or a comparable protected object.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A resource or capability is sensitive, consequential, or protected.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail a plural authorized or exposed actor set.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Multiple actors can access the protected object.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require excessive exposure rather than merely access by many necessary actors.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The number or scope of actors with access exceeds legitimate work need.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "A sensitive resource or capability is accessible to more actors than legitimate work requires.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Sensitive access is exposed to an excessive actor set.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P073-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Access control can expose a deliberately minimal set and does not require excessive access.", "slug": "access_control"}], "residual_id": "r:least_privilege_access_design:b038_a07_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b038_a07_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Sensitive information, irreversible actions, financial authority, physical spaces, or administrative controls are exposed to too many actors. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Sensitive information, irreversible actions, financial authority, physical spaces, or administrative controls are exposed to too many actors."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Access control can expose a deliberately minimal set and does not require excessive access.", "slug": "access_control"}], "normalized_requirement": "Sensitive information, actions, spaces, or administrative controls are exposed to too many actors.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Sensitive information, actions, spaces, or administrative controls are exposed to too many actors.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B5", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P073-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must concern an actual access grant or authority record.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A permission currently exists.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail missing recoverable permission purpose, not merely disagreement about whether the recorded purpose is adequate.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The organization cannot reconstruct the permission's purpose or reason for grant.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "The organization cannot reconstruct why an existing permission was granted.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A permission lacks reconstructible purpose.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P073-C13-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P073-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must concern an actual access grant or authority record.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A permission currently exists.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail missing approval provenance rather than merely an unavailable current owner.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The organization cannot reconstruct the actor or authority that approved the permission.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "The organization cannot reconstruct who approved an existing permission.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A permission lacks reconstructible approval provenance.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P073-C13-U2"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P073-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must concern an actual access grant or authority record.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A permission currently exists.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail missing expiry provenance, not merely that the permission has not yet expired.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The organization cannot reconstruct the permission's intended expiration condition or date.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "The organization cannot reconstruct when an existing permission should expire.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A permission lacks reconstructible intended expiry.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P073-C13-U3"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P073-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must concern an actual access grant or authority record.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A permission currently exists.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail missing operational-dependency provenance rather than merely unknown user preference.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The organization cannot reconstruct which work depends on the permission.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "The organization cannot reconstruct what work depends on an existing permission.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A permission lacks reconstructible work dependency.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P073-C13-U4"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Capability separation can be fully documented and does not entail missing permission provenance.", "slug": "capability_separation"}], "residual_id": "r:least_privilege_access_design:b038_a07_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b038_a07_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The organization cannot explain why a permission exists, who approved it, when it should expire, or what work would fail without it. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The organization cannot explain why a permission exists, who approved it, when it should expire, or what work would fail without it."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 4, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 4}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Capability separation can be fully documented and does not entail missing permission provenance.", "slug": "capability_separation"}], "normalized_requirement": "Permission purpose, approver, expiration, and dependency cannot be reconstructed.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 4 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Permission purpose, approver, expiration, and dependency cannot be reconstructed.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 5", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "DISJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Teams avoid narrowing access because they fear blocking legitimate work, creating bottlenecks, or handling exceptions manually.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Work requires access, but access creates power. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Teams avoid narrowing access because they fear blocking legitimate work, creating bottlenecks, or handling exceptions manually. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Teams avoid narrowing access because they fear blocking legitimate work, creating bottlenecks, or handling exceptions manually.", "Work requires access, but access creates power."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Teams avoid narrowing access because they fear blocking legitimate work, creating bottlenecks, or handling exceptions manually."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 38, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-038", "ledger_sha256": "9eac1cd431cdfd74bfc850fd9813997b6fcb59dca9656454602e305650a3bdcf"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Legacy-Form Refashioning", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:legacy_form_refashioning", "slug": "legacy_form_refashioning"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 2, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A new medium or substrate needs continuity with an older one to be understood and trusted, yet the old forms can trap the new system inside inherited constraints. If designers discard old forms too early, users experience alienation, illegibility, loss of legitimacy, or failed transfer. If designers keep old forms too long, the new medium becomes a costly imitation that suppresses its native affordances.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A new medium or substrate needs continuity with an older one to be understood and trusted, yet the old forms can trap the new system inside inherited constraints. If designers discard old forms too early, users experience alienation, illegibility, loss of legitimacy, or failed transfer. If designers keep old forms too long, the new medium becomes a costly imitation that suppresses its native affordances."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P073-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must identify a legacy form-bearing system rather than a wholly new form.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An established medium, interface, workflow, genre, institution, or comparable form exists on a prior substrate.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must include a target substrate meaningfully different from the prior one.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A distinct new substrate is available for the form.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail an actual migration transition rather than mere interoperability between old and new components.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The established form is undergoing transfer onto the new substrate.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "A legacy form-bearing system is moving from its existing substrate onto a new substrate.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An established form is undergoing substrate migration.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P073-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Legacy integration can connect old and new components without moving one form onto a new substrate.", "slug": "legacy_integration"}], "residual_id": "r:legacy_form_refashioning:b038_a08_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b038_a08_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A communication medium, interface, platform, workflow, format, genre, institution, or channel is moving onto a new substrate. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A communication medium, interface, platform, workflow, format, genre, institution, or channel is moving onto a new substrate."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Permanent coexistence behind a façade without cutover would falsify O3, but it lacks the candidate's retirement-directed migration sequence.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Strangler Fig Pattern", "one_liner": "Replace a legacy system incrementally in place by fronting it with a stable interception layer, rerouting one validated request path at a time to the replacement, and retiring the legacy once nothing routes to it.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:strangler_fig_pattern", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "strangler_fig_pattern"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "strangler_fig_pattern", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P073-C14-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every complete Strangler instance transfers an established legacy form to a distinct replacement substrate."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "If no component replacement occurred, substrate migration would be false, but the candidate constitutively requires sustained total replacement.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Ship of Theseus", "one_liner": "Expose that 'is it still the same thing?' has no brute answer once total component replacement pulls substrate-continuity apart from pattern-continuity — the verdict is relative to which identity criterion you have decided counts.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:ship_of_theseus", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "ship_of_theseus"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "ship_of_theseus", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P073-C14-U1", "why_it_fits": "The identity-criterion question does not erase the underlying direct relation: an established organization is transferred across complete substrate turnover."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A channel can decline without migration, but media convergence specifically requires shared digitization and cross-platform reorganization.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Media Convergence", "one_liner": "Explain the reshaping of media not as individual channels dying but as a shared digital substrate dissolving the boundaries between print, broadcast, telephony, and computing, with the erosion propagating up technological, industrial, and cultural layers.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:media_convergence", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "media_convergence"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "media_convergence", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P073-C14-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record directly entails established media forms undergoing migration to a distinct shared digital substrate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A medium, interface, workflow, genre, institution, or channel is migrating to a new substrate.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P073-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must identify the old form whose inherited structure can carry forward.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A legacy medium or form remains available during a transition.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require the period of transition rather than a stable single-medium setting.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A transition from the legacy form or substrate to a new one is underway.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail transition-critical perceptual or interpretive cues.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The legacy form supplies familiar cues that remain consequential during transition.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail transition-critical user expectations.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The legacy form supplies familiar expectations that remain consequential during transition.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail inherited legitimacy needed in the transition.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The legacy form supplies legitimacy that remains consequential during transition.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "One complete candidate branch must entail inherited user or institutional competence needed in the transition.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The legacy form supplies competence that remains consequential during transition.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "During substrate transition, a legacy form supplies consequential familiar cues, expectations, legitimacy, or competence.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A legacy form carries transition-critical continuity resources.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P073-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Remediation can refashion media without requiring legitimacy or competence inherited from the old form.", "slug": "remediation"}], "residual_id": "r:legacy_form_refashioning:b038_a08_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b038_a08_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The old medium supplies familiar cues, expectations, legitimacy, or competence that cannot be ignored during transition. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The old medium supplies familiar cues, expectations, legitimacy, or competence that cannot be ignored during transition."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Routine same-substrate releases preserve the law but falsify O2; the migration restriction excludes exactly that counterexample.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Lehman's law of conservation of familiarity", "one_liner": "Hold the mean change shipped per release of a long-lived software system roughly constant, because the producer and consumer communities have a bounded capacity to absorb novelty, and overdrawing it forces a corrective contraction.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:lehmans_law_of_conservation_of_familiarity", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "software_evolution_is_substrate_migration", "predicate": "The E-type software evolution is a migration from a legacy substrate to a distinct new substrate.", "rationale": "SSD and one complete DNF branch pass after the emitted atomic guard. Routine same-substrate releases preserve the law but falsify O2; the migration restriction excludes exactly that counterexample. The guard is candidate-anchored, sufficient, and introduces no second fact."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "lehmans_law_of_conservation_of_familiarity"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The E-type software evolution is a migration from a legacy substrate to a distinct new substrate."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "lehmans_law_of_conservation_of_familiarity", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P073-C15-U1", "why_it_fits": "The candidate supplies the legacy and familiarity/competence spine, and one native process restriction completes a transition branch."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Legacy form supplies familiar cues, expectations, legitimacy, or competence that remain consequential in transition.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P074-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require both the new substrate and the legacy-medium comparison roles.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "There is a new substrate and a corresponding legacy medium.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail the same directional affordance gain, not merely the existence of an affordance.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The new substrate supports an action possibility that the legacy medium did not support.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "The new substrate supports action possibilities that the legacy medium did not support.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "new substrate enables affordances absent from the legacy medium", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P074-C01-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An affordance can exist without comparison to a legacy medium or a migration.", "slug": "affordance"}], "residual_id": "r:legacy_form_refashioning:b038_a08_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b038_a08_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The new substrate has affordances the old one did not support, such as interactivity, recombination, real-time feedback, searchability, personalization, automation, or networked participation. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The new substrate has affordances the old one did not support, such as interactivity, recombination, real-time feedback, searchability, personalization, automation, or networked participation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An affordance can exist without comparison to a legacy medium or a migration.", "slug": "affordance"}], "normalized_requirement": "The new substrate offers action possibilities absent from the legacy medium.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The new substrate offers action possibilities absent from the legacy medium.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P074-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must type the assessor and the new-versus-legacy medium roles.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An evaluator encounters a new medium that has a legacy predecessor.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail legacy resemblance as the assessment basis, not merely familiarity.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The evaluator judges the new medium by how well it resembles the legacy medium.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the initial pre-understanding timing relation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The resemblance-based judgment occurs before the evaluator understands the new medium's distinctive value.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must support the modal risk without strengthening it to universal actuality.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The source asserts a possibility or risk of this judgment, not that every evaluator actually makes it.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "Relevant evaluators may initially judge a new medium by resemblance to the legacy medium before understanding its distinctive value.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "evaluators initially assess a new medium through legacy resemblance", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P074-C02-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Legacy integration need not cause users to judge new value by surface resemblance.", "slug": "legacy_integration"}], "residual_id": "r:legacy_form_refashioning:b038_a08_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b038_a08_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Users, stakeholders, regulators, or operators may judge the new medium by how well it resembles the old one before they understand its distinctive value. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Users, stakeholders, regulators, or operators may judge the new medium by how well it resembles the old one before they understand its distinctive value."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Legacy integration need not cause users to judge new value by surface resemblance.", "slug": "legacy_integration"}], "normalized_requirement": "Users judge the new medium by resemblance to the old before understanding its distinct value.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Users judge the new medium by resemblance to the old before understanding its distinct value.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P074-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require both the inherited form and the new-medium roles.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A legacy form is carried into a new medium.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail the legacy-to-new burden relation in this direction.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The legacy form imposes an adverse consequence on the new medium.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve onset or emerging actuality.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The adverse imposition is beginning rather than merely being hypothetically possible.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by an avoidable constraint on the new medium.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The consequence is an avoidable limit.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by a cost whose hidden character is entailed.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The consequence is a hidden cost.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by an expectation whose falsity is entailed.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The consequence is a false expectation.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Legacy forms are beginning to impose an avoidable limit, a hidden cost, or a false expectation on the new medium.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "legacy form begins to burden the new medium with an inherited adverse consequence", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P074-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Legacy integration can preserve useful behavior without imposing avoidable limits or false expectations.", "slug": "legacy_integration"}], "residual_id": "r:legacy_form_refashioning:b038_a08_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b038_a08_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Legacy forms are beginning to impose avoidable limits, hidden costs, or false expectations on the new medium. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Legacy forms are beginning to impose avoidable limits, hidden costs, or false expectations on the new medium."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Legacy integration can preserve useful behavior without imposing avoidable limits or false expectations.", "slug": "legacy_integration"}], "normalized_requirement": "Inherited legacy form imposes avoidable limits, costs, or false expectations on the new substrate.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Inherited legacy form imposes avoidable limits, costs, or false expectations on the new substrate.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The organization needs to preserve meaning, trust, accountability, access, or continuity while changing form.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A new medium or substrate needs continuity with an older one to be understood and trusted, yet the old forms can trap the new system inside inherited constraints. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: The organization needs to preserve meaning, trust, accountability, access, or continuity while changing form. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The organization needs to preserve meaning, trust, accountability, access, or continuity while changing form.", "A new medium or substrate needs continuity with an older one to be understood and trusted, yet the old forms can trap the new system inside inherited constraints."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The organization needs to preserve meaning, trust, accountability, access, or continuity while changing form."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 38, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-038", "ledger_sha256": "9eac1cd431cdfd74bfc850fd9813997b6fcb59dca9656454602e305650a3bdcf"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Leverage Point Intervention", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:leverage_point_intervention", "slug": "leverage_point_intervention"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a mismatch between where people apply effort and where the system actually reproduces its behavior. Symptom-level action may reduce pain locally, but the pattern returns because the maintaining structure remains untouched.\n\nIn leverage terms, the system has uneven sensitivity. Some points absorb effort with little effect. Others propagate change because they influence many decisions, flows, interpretations, or feedback loops. The challenge is to distinguish genuine leverage from attractive but low-impact intervention sites.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "The system is complex, coupled, or resistant to direct control, and many visible interventions consume effort without changing the underlying behavior, while less visible structural points may have much greater impact."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P074-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"], ["O1", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail repeated symptom-focused intervention as the shared antecedent.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Interventions repeatedly address manifestations of a pattern.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires post-intervention recurrence of the pattern.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The pattern returns after the interventions.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires post-intervention displacement of the pattern.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The pattern moves elsewhere after the interventions.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "After repeated efforts address symptoms, the pattern returns or moves elsewhere.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "pattern persists after repeated symptom-focused intervention", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P074-C04-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A leverage point can be identified before prior symptom interventions have failed.", "slug": "leverage_points"}], "residual_id": "r:leverage_point_intervention:b038_a09_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b038_a09_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Repeated efforts address symptoms but the pattern returns or moves elsewhere. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Repeated efforts address symptoms but the pattern returns or moves elsewhere."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A leverage point can be identified before prior symptom interventions have failed.", "slug": "leverage_points"}], "normalized_requirement": "Repeated symptom-focused interventions leave the pattern recurrent or displaced elsewhere.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Repeated symptom-focused interventions leave the pattern recurrent or displaced elsewhere.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact hierarchy ranks intervention points from parameter tweaks to goals and paradigms by structural power.", "role_mapping": "Many interventions -> ranked points; local effect -> low leverage; system change -> high leverage.", "slug": "leverage_points", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b038_a09_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Many plausible interventions are available, but most would only affect local behavior or isolated cases. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Many plausible interventions are available, but most would only affect local behavior or isolated cases."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Leverage Points", "one_liner": "High-impact intervention points.", "page_ref": "prime:leverage_points", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Many interventions -> ranked points; local effect -> low leverage; system change -> high leverage.", "slug": "leverage_points", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact hierarchy ranks intervention points from parameter tweaks to goals and paradigms by structural power."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Candidate intervention points differ sharply in whether they change local cases or system structure.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The systems premise is that a small number of structural intervention points can have disproportionate downstream effect.", "role_mapping": "Compact structure -> intervention point; downstream actions -> system-wide leverage.", "slug": "leverage_points", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b038_a09_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A small number of rules, defaults, bottlenecks, incentives, feedbacks, information flows, or goals appear to shape many downstream actions. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A small number of rules, defaults, bottlenecks, incentives, feedbacks, information flows, or goals appear to shape many downstream actions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Leverage Points", "one_liner": "High-impact intervention points.", "page_ref": "prime:leverage_points", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Compact structure -> intervention point; downstream actions -> system-wide leverage.", "slug": "leverage_points", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The systems premise is that a small number of structural intervention points can have disproportionate downstream effect."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A compact rule, default, incentive, feedback, information flow, bottleneck, or goal shapes many downstream actions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A true leverage point can be identified experimentally or analytically without a map artifact.", "slug": "leverage_points"}], "residual_id": "r:leverage_point_intervention:b038_a09_c5", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b038_a09_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A system map, causal loop map, process map, network map, or stakeholder analysis suggests a compact point of influence. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A system map, causal loop map, process map, network map, or stakeholder analysis suggests a compact point of influence."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A true leverage point can be identified experimentally or analytically without a map artifact.", "slug": "leverage_points"}], "normalized_requirement": "A system or stakeholder map suggests a compact point of influence.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A system or stakeholder map suggests a compact point of influence.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P074-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve both contrasted loci and the symptom-side targeting direction.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The intervention is applied where symptoms are visible rather than where causes propagate.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail actual intervention failure, not merely lower possible leverage.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The existing intervention fails.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail this mislocation as a cause of failure rather than a coincident fact.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Targeting the symptom locus instead of the propagation locus causes the failure.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Existing interventions fail because they are applied at visible symptom loci rather than at loci where causes propagate.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "intervention failure caused by targeting symptom loci instead of causal-propagation loci", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P074-C05-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Leverage-point analysis can be applied prospectively without existing misplaced interventions.", "slug": "leverage_points"}], "residual_id": "r:leverage_point_intervention:b038_a09_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b038_a09_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Existing interventions fail because they are applied where symptoms are visible rather than where causes propagate. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Existing interventions fail because they are applied where symptoms are visible rather than where causes propagate."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Before any cosmetic intervention is actually attempted, the loop still has the same diagnosis but O2 lacks an existing failed intervention.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Navigation loop", "one_liner": "Diagnose a workflow where a user cannot reach their goal by modeling the interface as a directed graph and asking one structural question — is any goal state reachable from the current state? — rather than blaming screen quality or user confusion.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:navigation_loop", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2"], "guard_type": "MODALITY_ACTUALIZATION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "cosmetic_intervention_actualized", "predicate": "a cosmetic screen-level intervention has already been applied to the loop", "rationale": "The one qualifier is anchored in the candidate's existing role inventory, fills exactly ['O2'], and leaves no complete candidate-plus-guard instance outside the selected DNF branch."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "navigation_loop"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "cosmetic_intervention_actualized"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "navigation_loop", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P074-C05-U1", "why_it_fits": "The candidate directly explains why screen-level remedies fail to change graph reachability; one actuality qualifier supplies the existing attempt. Standardized disagreement dimensions (SSD): CONTEXT_GUARD_SCOPE."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Existing interventions are applied where symptoms appear rather than where causes propagate.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Resources for intervention are limited and must be concentrated where they can change the system rather than merely treat visible damage.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The archetype should not be used merely because a point is visible, politically convenient, or rhetorically dramatic. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Resources for intervention are limited and must be concentrated where they can change the system rather than merely treat visible damage. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Resources for intervention are limited and must be concentrated where they can change the system rather than merely treat visible damage.", "The archetype should not be used merely because a point is visible, politically convenient, or rhetorically dramatic."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Resources for intervention are limited and must be concentrated where they can change the system rather than merely treat visible damage."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 38, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-038", "ledger_sha256": "9eac1cd431cdfd74bfc850fd9813997b6fcb59dca9656454602e305650a3bdcf"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Lifecycle Adaptability Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:lifecycle_adaptability_design", "slug": "lifecycle_adaptability_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 2, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Long-lived solutions encounter changes that their initial designers cannot specify in\ndetail. Technologies age at different rates. Regulations, suppliers, formats, users,\nenvironments, and organizational responsibilities shift. A static design turns these\nordinary lifecycle events into exceptional reconstruction because change-prone elements\nare embedded in expensive stable structures.\n\nThe visible symptom is often disproportionate change cost: a small requirement forces a\nlarge redesign, or an obsolete dependency prevents an otherwise useful system from\ncontinuing. Less visible symptoms include inaccessible assemblies, undocumented rationale,\nconsumed spare capacity, compatibility promises without end dates, and retirement plans\nthat omit users, data, materials, or residual obligations.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A solution is optimized for its initial state while foreseeable maintenance, upgrade, regulatory, scale, use, ownership, environmental, and end-of-life changes remain cross-cutting, inaccessible, incompatible, or irreversible."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P074-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must type both the system-life and external-change horizons.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A system has an expected service-life horizon and faces a relevant external-change horizon.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail the same direction of time-scale separation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The expected service life is long relative to the external-change horizon.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the expected or prospective status of the horizons.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The comparison concerns expected future service life and change, not only elapsed history.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "The system's expected service life is long relative to the horizon of relevant external change.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "expected service life exceeds an external-change horizon", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P074-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Lifecycle-adaptable design can be useful for short-lived systems and does not entail this horizon mismatch.", "slug": "design_for_lifecycle_adaptability"}], "residual_id": "r:lifecycle_adaptability_design:b038_a10_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b038_a10_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The expected service life is long relative to technology, demand, policy, or environmental change. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The expected service life is long relative to technology, demand, policy, or environmental change."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Lifecycle-adaptable design can be useful for short-lived systems and does not entail this horizon mismatch.", "slug": "design_for_lifecycle_adaptability"}], "normalized_requirement": "Expected service life is long relative to technology, demand, policy, or environmental change.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Expected service life is long relative to technology, demand, policy, or environmental change.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P074-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require the change-prone peripheral role and core role.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A change-prone element and a system core occupy the two coupling roles.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail tight coupling, not mere connection or optional compatibility.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The change-prone element is tightly coupled to the core.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires the core's relative stability.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The coupled core is stable relative to the change-prone element.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires the core's expense, not merely importance.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The coupled core is expensive.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A change-prone element is tightly coupled to a core that is stable or expensive.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "change-prone element tightly coupled to a stable or expensive core", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P074-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact design separates change-prone elements from the stable core; tight coupling is its inverse.", "slug": "design_for_lifecycle_adaptability"}], "residual_id": "r:lifecycle_adaptability_design:b038_a10_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b038_a10_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "ordinary lifecycle events into exceptional reconstruction because change-prone elements. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Change-prone elements are tightly coupled to a stable or expensive core.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Change-prone elements are tightly coupled to a stable or expensive core.", "ordinary lifecycle events into exceptional reconstruction because change-prone elements"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A new program can be stable and one-off; adaptive reuse alone does not make it change-prone.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Adaptive Reuse", "one_liner": "Retain an existing building's physical substance — structure, envelope, site, silhouette — while replacing the function it serves, fitting a new program into the inherited constraint envelope rather than designing a building around the program.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:adaptive_reuse", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "change_prone_new_program", "predicate": "the candidate new program is change-prone", "rationale": "The one qualifier is anchored in the candidate's existing role inventory, fills exactly ['O1'], and leaves no complete candidate-plus-guard instance outside the selected DNF branch."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "adaptive_reuse"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "change_prone_new_program"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "adaptive_reuse", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P074-C07-U1", "why_it_fits": "The candidate directly supplies tight coupling to a fixed, embodied-value core; one type restriction on the new program completes the source. Standardized disagreement dimensions (SSD): CONTEXT_GUARD_SCOPE."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A god object can centralize many stable responsibilities without any one of them being change-prone.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "God Object Anti-Pattern", "one_liner": "Diagnose a maintenance mess as concentrated rather than diffuse: one class or service accumulates outlier fan-in and fan-out to become the integration hub, collapsing modularity so all change-cost, comprehension, and new features funnel through that single node.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:god_object_anti_pattern", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "change_prone_hub_responsibility", "predicate": "one responsibility coupled through the hub is change-prone", "rationale": "The one qualifier is anchored in the candidate's existing role inventory, fills exactly ['O1'], and leaves no complete candidate-plus-guard instance outside the selected DNF branch."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "god_object_anti_pattern"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "change_prone_hub_responsibility"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "god_object_anti_pattern", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P074-C07-U1", "why_it_fits": "Hub coupling and concentrated change cost supply the spine; a single property restriction on one existing responsibility fills the role typing. Standardized disagreement dimensions (SSD): CONTEXT_GUARD_SCOPE."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Change-prone elements are tightly coupled to a stable or expensive core.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P074-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the later-phase versus initial-delivery baseline.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A later lifecycle phase is compared with initial delivery of the same solution.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail a difference in actor roles, not merely reassignment of the same actors.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The later phase requires actors different from those used for initial delivery.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must independently entail a difference in required capabilities.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The later phase requires capabilities different from those used for initial delivery.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the future necessity expressed by 'will require.'", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The different requirements are prospectively necessary for the later phase.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by maintenance-phase requirements.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The later phase is maintenance.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by upgrade-phase requirements.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The later phase is upgrade.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by repurposing-phase requirements.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The later phase is repurposing.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by retirement-phase requirements.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The later phase is retirement.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "At least one later lifecycle phase will require actors and capabilities different from those used for initial delivery.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "later lifecycle phase requires actor-and-capability configuration different from initial delivery", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P074-C08-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Maintenance can be performed by the original builder and need not extend to repurposing or retirement.", "slug": "maintenance"}], "residual_id": "r:lifecycle_adaptability_design:b038_a10_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b038_a10_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Maintenance, upgrade, repurposing, or retirement will require different actors and capabilities than initial delivery. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Maintenance, upgrade, repurposing, or retirement will require different actors and capabilities than initial delivery."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Maintenance can be performed by the original builder and need not extend to repurposing or retirement.", "slug": "maintenance"}], "normalized_requirement": "Maintenance, upgrade, repurposing, and retirement require actors or capabilities different from initial delivery.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Maintenance, upgrade, repurposing, and retirement require actors or capabilities different from initial delivery.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Adaptation can respond to one known change and does not require multiple unordered future configurations.", "slug": "adaptation"}], "residual_id": "r:lifecycle_adaptability_design:b038_a10_c5", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b038_a10_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Multiple future configurations are plausible but their exact sequence is unknown. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Multiple future configurations are plausible but their exact sequence is unknown."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Adaptation can respond to one known change and does not require multiple unordered future configurations.", "slug": "adaptation"}], "normalized_requirement": "Several future configurations are plausible but their order is unknown.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Several future configurations are plausible but their order is unknown.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P074-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must supply plural lifecycle elements whose change schedules can be compared.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "At least two lifecycle-relevant elements or dependencies can change.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail asynchronous evolution, not merely different element types.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The elements evolve on nonaligned schedules.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the prospective likelihood without requiring actual completed divergence.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Asynchronous evolution is likely rather than asserted as already observed.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "Multiple lifecycle dependencies are likely to evolve on nonaligned schedules.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "interdependent lifecycle elements likely evolve asynchronously", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P074-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An interface can remain stable while connected elements co-evolve synchronously.", "slug": "interface"}], "residual_id": "r:lifecycle_adaptability_design:b038_a10_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b038_a10_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Interfaces, formats, skills, suppliers, or dependencies are likely to evolve asynchronously. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Interfaces, formats, skills, suppliers, or dependencies are likely to evolve asynchronously."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A truly closed S-type program with no moving external environment would falsify the source, but it is excluded by the candidate's E-type role restriction.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Lehman's law of continuing change", "one_liner": "The empirical software-evolution law that an E-type system — one embedded in a moving real-world environment — must be continually adapted or it progressively becomes less satisfactory, because its fitness is relational (the gap between what the code does and what the world now requires) and that gap widens monotonically while the code stands still.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:lehmans_law_of_continuing_change", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "lehmans_law_of_continuing_change"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "lehmans_law_of_continuing_change", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P074-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "The empirical law directly supplies plural interdependent elements, nonaligned evolution, and a prospective stronger-than-likely modality. Standardized disagreement dimensions (SSD): OTHER."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Interfaces, formats, skills, suppliers, or dependencies evolve asynchronously.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Downtime, replacement, stranded investment, or disposal would be costly or harmful.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "downtime would be expensive or harmful; and when meaningful future changes can be grouped. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Downtime, replacement, stranded investment, or disposal would be costly or harmful. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Downtime, replacement, stranded investment, or disposal would be costly or harmful.", "downtime would be expensive or harmful; and when meaningful future changes can be grouped"]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Downtime, replacement, stranded investment, or disposal would be costly or harmful."}, {"display_text": "End-of-life recovery, safe dismantling, archival, or handoff obligations matter.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this deployment constraint: End-of-life recovery, safe dismantling, archival, or handoff obligations matter. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["End-of-life recovery, safe dismantling, archival, or handoff obligations matter."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "End-of-life recovery, safe dismantling, archival, or handoff obligations matter."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 38, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-038", "ledger_sha256": "9eac1cd431cdfd74bfc850fd9813997b6fcb59dca9656454602e305650a3bdcf"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Lifecycle Trade-Off Evaluation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:lifecycle_tradeoff_evaluation", "slug": "lifecycle_tradeoff_evaluation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A decision maker evaluates an intervention using a partial lifecycle view, causing environmental burdens to be hidden, displaced, or over-weighted depending on which stage is easiest to measure.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A decision maker evaluates an intervention using a partial lifecycle view, causing environmental burdens to be hidden, displaced, or over-weighted depending on which stage is easiest to measure."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An LCA can characterize one system without a competing alternative or lower-burden claim.", "slug": "life_cycle_assessment_lca"}], "residual_id": "r:lifecycle_tradeoff_evaluation:b038_a11_c1", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b038_a11_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: An alternative claims lower emissions, resource use, toxicity, waste, or environmental burden relative to a baseline. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["An alternative claims lower emissions, resource use, toxicity, waste, or environmental burden relative to a baseline."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An LCA can characterize one system without a competing alternative or lower-burden claim.", "slug": "life_cycle_assessment_lca"}], "normalized_requirement": "An alternative claims lower environmental burden than a baseline.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "An alternative claims lower environmental burden than a baseline.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Boundary-explicit accounting across cradle-to-grave stages and material flows is the prime's core.", "role_mapping": "Lifecycle stages -> temporal/material boundary; distributed burdens -> stage-specific impacts.", "slug": "life_cycle_assessment_lca", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b038_a11_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Benefits and harms are distributed across different lifecycle stages, such as manufacturing, use, maintenance, transport, recycling, and end-of-life. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Benefits and harms are distributed across different lifecycle stages, such as manufacturing, use, maintenance, transport, recycling, and end-of-life."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)", "one_liner": "Environmental impact over time.", "page_ref": "prime:life_cycle_assessment_lca", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Lifecycle stages -> temporal/material boundary; distributed burdens -> stage-specific impacts.", "slug": "life_cycle_assessment_lca", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Boundary-explicit accounting across cradle-to-grave stages and material flows is the prime's core."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Environmental benefits and harms are distributed across manufacturing, use, maintenance, transport, recycling, and end-of-life stages.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact output is a multidimensional impact-category profile whose aggregation requires value judgments.", "role_mapping": "Impact categories -> LCA profile; explicit weights -> allocation/value judgment.", "slug": "life_cycle_assessment_lca", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b038_a11_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Several environmental impact categories matter and cannot be responsibly collapsed into a single score without explicit weights. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Several environmental impact categories matter and cannot be responsibly collapsed into a single score without explicit weights."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)", "one_liner": "Environmental impact over time.", "page_ref": "prime:life_cycle_assessment_lca", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Impact categories -> LCA profile; explicit weights -> allocation/value judgment.", "slug": "life_cycle_assessment_lca", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact output is a multidimensional impact-category profile whose aggregation requires value judgments."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Several environmental impact categories must remain explicit unless value weights are declared.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P074-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail decision-basis narrowing to one frame, not ordinary use of multiple evidence sources.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A decision is based on exactly one salient evaluative frame.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the counterfactual baseline rather than assert an irrevocably completed decision.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "This narrow basis is the counterfactual default expressed by 'would otherwise.'", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires single-metric narrowing.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The single evaluative frame is one salient metric.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires single-stage narrowing.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The single evaluative frame is one lifecycle stage.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires single-stakeholder-perspective narrowing.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The single evaluative frame is one stakeholder perspective.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Under the source's counterfactual default, a decision would be based on one salient metric, one lifecycle stage, or one stakeholder perspective.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "decision defaults to one salient evaluative frame", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P074-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "LCA can be conducted without an existing decision-maker committed to a single salient metric.", "slug": "life_cycle_assessment_lca"}], "residual_id": "r:lifecycle_tradeoff_evaluation:b038_a11_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b038_a11_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A decision would otherwise be made from one salient metric, one stage, or one stakeholder perspective. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A decision would otherwise be made from one salient metric, one stage, or one stakeholder perspective."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "LCA can be conducted without an existing decision-maker committed to a single salient metric.", "slug": "life_cycle_assessment_lca"}], "normalized_requirement": "A decision would otherwise rely on one salient metric, lifecycle stage, or stakeholder perspective.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A decision would otherwise rely on one salient metric, lifecycle stage, or stakeholder perspective.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The intervention changes materials, energy sources, operating efficiency, lifetime, disposal pathways, or supply-chain inputs.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The intervention changes materials, energy sources, operating efficiency, lifetime, disposal pathways, or supply-chain inputs. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The intervention changes materials, energy sources, operating efficiency, lifetime, disposal pathways, or supply-chain inputs."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "The intervention changes materials, energy sources, operating efficiency, lifetime, disposal pathways, or supply-chain inputs."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 38, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-038", "ledger_sha256": "9eac1cd431cdfd74bfc850fd9813997b6fcb59dca9656454602e305650a3bdcf"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "LIFO Stack Discipline", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:lifo_stack_discipline", "slug": "lifo_stack_discipline"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system creates temporary nested contexts but does not preserve the order, boundary, payload, or restoration rule that lets those contexts close safely. Work can then return to the wrong context, release resources out of order, leave obligations dangling, corrupt local state, or treat a nested interruption as if it were a flat sequence.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system creates temporary nested contexts but does not preserve the order, boundary, payload, or restoration rule that lets those contexts close safely. Work can then return to the wrong context, release resources out of order, leave obligations dangling, corrupt local state, or treat a nested interruption as if it were a flat sequence."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A collection of open obligations extended only at the top is the exact nesting discipline.", "role_mapping": "Nested opens -> pushes; open contexts -> stack depth.", "slug": "stack", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b038_a12_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Actions, calls, transactions, permissions, resources, or interpretive contexts are opened inside one another. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Actions, calls, transactions, permissions, resources, or interpretive contexts are opened inside one another."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Stack", "one_liner": "A strictly nested discipline where what was opened last must close first.", "page_ref": "prime:stack", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Nested opens -> pushes; open contexts -> stack depth.", "slug": "stack", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A collection of open obligations extended only at the top is the exact nesting discipline."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Actions, calls, permissions, resources, or contexts open strictly inside one another.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The interior is sealed while the top is active, and popping re-exposes the prior item.", "role_mapping": "Suspended parent -> item below top; child -> current top; resume -> pop reveals parent.", "slug": "stack", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b038_a12_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The current task must suspend a parent context and later resume it unchanged. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The current task must suspend a parent context and later resume it unchanged."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Stack", "one_liner": "A strictly nested discipline where what was opened last must close first.", "page_ref": "prime:stack", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Suspended parent -> item below top; child -> current top; resume -> pop reveals parent.", "slug": "stack", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The interior is sealed while the top is active, and popping re-exposes the prior item."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Opening a child suspends the parent, which must later resume unchanged after the child closes.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The last-in-first-out invariant fixes closing order as the reverse of opening.", "role_mapping": "Later frame -> last push; closes first -> pop order.", "slug": "stack", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b038_a12_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Closure order matters because later frames depend on earlier frames remaining valid. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Closure order matters because later frames depend on earlier frames remaining valid."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Stack", "one_liner": "A strictly nested discipline where what was opened last must close first.", "page_ref": "prime:stack", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Later frame -> last push; closes first -> pop order.", "slug": "stack", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The last-in-first-out invariant fixes closing order as the reverse of opening."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Later-opened frames must close before earlier frames on which they depend.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A distinguished accessible top and the item directly beneath it are mandatory to correct pop and resumption.", "role_mapping": "Current context -> top; next resumed -> predecessor beneath top.", "slug": "stack", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b038_a12_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Users or operators need to know what context is currently active and what will resume next. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Users or operators need to know what context is currently active and what will resume next."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Stack", "one_liner": "A strictly nested discipline where what was opened last must close first.", "page_ref": "prime:stack", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Current context -> top; next resumed -> predecessor beneath top.", "slug": "stack", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A distinguished accessible top and the item directly beneath it are mandatory to correct pop and resumption."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The active top context and the context that will resume next must remain identifiable.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Failure or interruption can occur while multiple frames are open.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Failure or interruption can occur while multiple frames are open. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Failure or interruption can occur while multiple frames are open."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Failure or interruption can occur while multiple frames are open."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 38, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-038", "ledger_sha256": "9eac1cd431cdfd74bfc850fd9813997b6fcb59dca9656454602e305650a3bdcf"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Liquidity Reserve", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:liquidity_reserve", "slug": "liquidity_reserve"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 3, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a mismatch between value and immediacy. A system may own valuable resources, but those resources may be locked in a form, location, contract, schedule, approval chain, or market that cannot be converted in time. Under normal conditions this may be invisible because ordinary flows work. Under stress, conversion delay becomes a critical failure.\n\nTypical symptoms include forced sales, emergency procurement, last-minute borrowing, crisis staffing, missed obligations, or brittle dependence on ideal conditions. The deeper tension is that everyday efficiency pushes resources toward full use or higher yield, while resilience requires some resources to remain available for low-probability, high-consequence moments.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "The system has assets, resources, capacity, or relationships, but they are locked in forms that cannot be turned into the needed usable resource quickly enough when obligations, shocks, or opportunities arise."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A maintained surplus exists to bridge the shift from nominal load to a named contingency without rupture.", "role_mapping": "Obligation arrival -> contingency demand; slow ordinary conversion -> need for immediately drawable surplus.", "slug": "reserve", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b038_a13_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Obligations or opportunities arrive faster than ordinary conversion, procurement, hiring, borrowing, or reallocation can occur. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Obligations or opportunities arrive faster than ordinary conversion, procurement, hiring, borrowing, or reallocation can occur."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Reserve", "one_liner": "Deliberately maintained surplus held beyond expected need so the system can absorb variation, uncertainty, or shock without failing.", "page_ref": "prime:reserve", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Obligation arrival -> contingency demand; slow ordinary conversion -> need for immediately drawable surplus.", "slug": "reserve", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A maintained surplus exists to bridge the shift from nominal load to a named contingency without rupture."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A named contingency can raise resource demand faster than ordinary conversion, procurement, hiring, borrowing, or reallocation can respond.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P074-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail an immediate-access shortfall, not only long-run aggregate scarcity.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The needed usable resource is not immediately available.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the conditional or counterfactual necessity of the emergency response.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "An emergency response would be required under that shortfall.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires forced liquidation paired with a large-loss consequence.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Forced liquidation would impose a large loss.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires forced liquidation paired with operational risk.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Forced liquidation would create operational risk.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires emergency purchasing paired with a large-loss consequence.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Emergency purchasing would impose a large loss.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires emergency purchasing paired with operational risk.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "Emergency purchasing would create operational risk.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires scramble redeployment paired with a large-loss consequence.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "Scramble redeployment would impose a large loss.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires scramble redeployment paired with operational risk.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "Scramble redeployment would create operational risk.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Without an immediately usable resource, forced liquidation, emergency purchasing, or scramble redeployment would impose a large loss or create operational risk.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "liquidity shortfall necessitates a costly or operationally risky emergency response", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P074-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Reserve protects many contingencies that do not involve liquidation, purchasing, or redeployment.", "slug": "reserve"}], "residual_id": "r:liquidity_reserve:b038_a13_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b038_a13_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Forced liquidation, emergency purchasing, or scramble redeployment would impose large losses or create operational risk. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Forced liquidation, emergency purchasing, or scramble redeployment would impose large losses or create operational risk."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A calm repricing in which rollover remains open and no forced sale follows is not a Minsky moment, whose precipitating event is defined by fire-sale deleveraging.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Minsky Moment", "one_liner": "The financial collapse in which an extended calm endogenously breeds its own undoing — leveraged actors drift from hedge to speculative to Ponzi finance until a modest trigger reveals the hidden fragility and forces a cascade of fire-sale deleveraging; stability is destabilizing.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:minsky_moment", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "minsky_moment"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "minsky_moment", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P074-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "The event closes the refinancing path on leveraged positions and necessarily converts the shortfall into a cascade of loss-amplifying fire sales. Standardized disagreement dimensions (SSD): OTHER."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Absent immediate resources, forced liquidation, emergency purchasing, or scramble redeployment would impose large losses.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P074-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must type an access channel and its usable-resource function.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An ordinary channel provides access to a needed resource.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve normal-times reliability as the comparison baseline.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The channel is reliable in normal times.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail the correlated-stress context, not merely ordinary congestion.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Degradation occurs during correlated stress.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires uncertainty of access during stress.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Access becomes uncertain.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires access delay during stress.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Access becomes slow.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires contention over access during stress.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "Access becomes contested.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A resource-access channel is reliable in normal times but uncertain, slow, or contested during correlated stress.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "ordinary resource access is degraded relative to normal operation during correlated stress", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P074-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A reserve can cover an idiosyncratic shock while ordinary access channels remain reliable.", "slug": "reserve"}], "residual_id": "r:liquidity_reserve:b038_a13_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b038_a13_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Resource access channels are reliable in normal times but uncertain, slow, or contested during correlated stress. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Resource access channels are reliable in normal times but uncertain, slow, or contested during correlated stress."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A genuinely independent depositor population whose aggregate outflow stays smooth under a shared event is excluded by the candidate's activated correlation structure.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Deposit Concentration Risk", "one_liner": "Judge a bank's funding fragility by the correlation-adjusted effective depositor count rather than the headline number — coupled depositors collapse toward one bet, voiding the law-of-large-numbers smoothing a large base seems to guarantee.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:deposit_concentration_risk", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "deposit_concentration_risk"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "deposit_concentration_risk", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P074-C12-U1", "why_it_fits": "The same funding channel that appears stable by depositor count can become uncertain when correlated stress makes nominally many depositors withdraw as one. Standardized disagreement dimensions (SSD): none."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Confidence-insensitive long-term financing whose availability cannot flip under a run is excluded by the defining maturity-and-sensitivity mismatch.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Funding Fragility", "one_liner": "The condition in which an entity depends on short, revocable, confidence-sensitive financing to sustain long, illiquid positions, so that the same balance sheet supports both a continued-funding equilibrium and a self-fulfilling run equilibrium — and can be killed while technically solvent.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:funding_fragility", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "funding_fragility"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "funding_fragility", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P074-C12-U1", "why_it_fits": "The ordinary rollover channel can function in the continued equilibrium yet becomes uncertain under correlated confidence stress. Standardized disagreement dimensions (SSD): none."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Ordinary resource-access channels become slow, uncertain, or contested during correlated stress.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P074-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail both critical-function and scarce-resource role restrictions.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The dependent activity is a critical function and its dependency object is a scarce resource.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail operational dependency, not merely beneficial use.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The critical function depends on the scarce resource.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail inability to substitute within the relevant short time window.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The resource cannot be substituted quickly.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "A critical function depends on a scarce resource that cannot be substituted quickly.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "critical function depends on a scarce, rapidly nonsubstitutable resource", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P074-C13-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A reserve can be held for a substitutable resource or noncritical opportunity.", "slug": "reserve"}], "residual_id": "r:liquidity_reserve:b038_a13_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b038_a13_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Critical functions depend on a scarce resource that cannot be substituted quickly. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Critical functions depend on a scarce resource that cannot be substituted quickly."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Abundant alternative funding could replace a withdrawn lender quickly even though the original funding was short and confidence-sensitive.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Funding Fragility", "one_liner": "The condition in which an entity depends on short, revocable, confidence-sensitive financing to sustain long, illiquid positions, so that the same balance sheet supports both a continued-funding equilibrium and a self-fulfilling run equilibrium — and can be killed while technically solvent.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:funding_fragility", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "scarce_confidence_sensitive_funding", "predicate": "the confidence-sensitive funding is scarce at the relevant continuity horizon", "rationale": "The one qualifier is anchored in the candidate's existing role inventory, fills exactly ['O1'], and leaves no complete candidate-plus-guard instance outside the selected DNF branch."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "funding_fragility"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "scarce_confidence_sensitive_funding"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "funding_fragility", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P074-C13-U1", "why_it_fits": "The candidate supplies continuity dependence and short-horizon nonsubstitutability; one scarcity restriction completes the resource type. Standardized disagreement dimensions (SSD): CONTEXT_GUARD_SCOPE, POLARITY_OR_MODALITY, ROLE_TYPE."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A critical function depends on a scarce resource that cannot be substituted quickly.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 38, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-038", "ledger_sha256": "9eac1cd431cdfd74bfc850fd9813997b6fcb59dca9656454602e305650a3bdcf"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Literal-vs-Figurative Boundary Preservation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:literal_vs_figurative_boundary_preservation", "slug": "literal_vs_figurative_boundary_preservation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A comparison intended to clarify one feature of a target is received, repeated, or operationalized as literal equivalence, causing false inference, overextended analogy, policy error, contractual ambiguity, or misreading of poetic and explanatory language.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A comparison intended to clarify one feature of a target is received, repeated, or operationalized as literal equivalence, causing false inference, overextended analogy, policy error, contractual ambiguity, or misreading of poetic and explanatory language."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact structure maps selected source-domain roles and relations into a target domain.", "role_mapping": "Familiar source -> source domain; unfamiliar concept -> target; explanation -> conceptual mapping.", "slug": "metaphor", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b038_a14_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A speaker or designer needs to use a familiar source domain to explain an unfamiliar, abstract, or complex target. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A speaker or designer needs to use a familiar source domain to explain an unfamiliar, abstract, or complex target."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Metaphor", "one_liner": "Conceptual mapping.", "page_ref": "prime:metaphor", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Familiar source -> source domain; unfamiliar concept -> target; explanation -> conceptual mapping.", "slug": "metaphor", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact structure maps selected source-domain roles and relations into a target domain."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A familiar source domain is projected onto an unfamiliar or abstract target to support understanding.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Metaphor is a partial mapping that licenses selected entailments while explicitly not claiming identity.", "role_mapping": "Resemblance -> partial mapping; nonidentity -> selective transfer boundary.", "slug": "metaphor", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b038_a14_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The comparison is useful because of resemblance, but source and target are not identical and should not be treated as equivalent. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The comparison is useful because of resemblance, but source and target are not identical and should not be treated as equivalent."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Metaphor", "one_liner": "Conceptual mapping.", "page_ref": "prime:metaphor", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Resemblance -> partial mapping; nonidentity -> selective transfer boundary.", "slug": "metaphor", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Metaphor is a partial mapping that licenses selected entailments while explicitly not claiming identity."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The mapping imports useful resemblance and inference structure without asserting source-target identity.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A metaphor can be transparently marked and correctly understood by every recipient.", "slug": "metaphor"}], "residual_id": "r:literal_vs_figurative_boundary_preservation:b038_a14_c3", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b038_a14_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Audience members may lack enough context to distinguish figurative comparison from literal claim. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Audience members may lack enough context to distinguish figurative comparison from literal claim."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A metaphor can be transparently marked and correctly understood by every recipient.", "slug": "metaphor"}], "normalized_requirement": "Audience members may lack the context needed to distinguish figurative mapping from literal assertion.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Audience members may lack the context needed to distinguish figurative mapping from literal assertion.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P074-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must type the at-risk feature specifically as a figurative marker.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The source language carries a marker that distinguishes its figurative status.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail the handling-to-marker-loss risk direction.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Downstream handling of the language increases the risk that the marker is stripped away.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve possibility or increased risk without strengthening to inevitability.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The source asserts increased risk, not certain marker removal.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by quotation downstream.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The downstream handling is quotation.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by summarization downstream.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The downstream handling is summarization.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by translation downstream.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The downstream handling is translation.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by automated processing downstream.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The downstream handling is automation.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by formalization downstream.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The downstream handling is formalization.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Downstream quotation, summarization, translation, automation, or formalization of figurative language increases the risk that its figurative marker is stripped away.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "downstream reexpression increases risk of losing a figurative marker", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P074-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Past-state contamination concerns later information entering an earlier reconstruction, not loss of figurative marking.", "slug": "past_state_contamination"}], "residual_id": "r:literal_vs_figurative_boundary_preservation:b038_a14_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b038_a14_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The language may be quoted, summarized, translated, automated, or formalized downstream, increasing risk that the marker is stripped away. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The language may be quoted, summarized, translated, automated, or formalized downstream, increasing risk that the marker is stripped away."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Past-state contamination concerns later information entering an earlier reconstruction, not loss of figurative marking.", "slug": "past_state_contamination"}], "normalized_requirement": "Quotation, translation, summarization, automation, or formalization may strip away the figurative marker.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Quotation, translation, summarization, automation, or formalization may strip away the figurative marker.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The domain is sensitive to overclaiming, such as law, medicine, safety, science communication, public policy, education, or contracts.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The domain is sensitive to overclaiming, such as law, medicine, safety, science communication, public policy, education, or contracts. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The domain is sensitive to overclaiming, such as law, medicine, safety, science communication, public policy, education, or contracts."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The domain is sensitive to overclaiming, such as law, medicine, safety, science communication, public policy, education, or contracts."}, {"display_text": "A poetic, rhetorical, or pedagogical comparison must remain interpretable without being flattened into literal paraphrase.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A comparison intended to clarify one feature of a target is received, repeated, or operationalized as literal equivalence, causing false inference, overextended analogy, policy error, contractual ambiguity, or misreading of poetic and explanatory language. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: A poetic, rhetorical, or pedagogical comparison must remain interpretable without being flattened into literal paraphrase. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A poetic, rhetorical, or pedagogical comparison must remain interpretable without being flattened into literal paraphrase.", "A comparison intended to clarify one feature of a target is received, repeated, or operationalized as literal equivalence, causing false inference, overextended analogy, policy error, contractual ambiguity, or misreading of poetic and explanatory language."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "A poetic, rhetorical, or pedagogical comparison must remain interpretable without being flattened into literal paraphrase."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 38, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-038", "ledger_sha256": "9eac1cd431cdfd74bfc850fd9813997b6fcb59dca9656454602e305650a3bdcf"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Lived Experience Capture", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:lived_experience_capture", "slug": "lived_experience_capture"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 4, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 2, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 3, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 3 of 4 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is an evidence asymmetry between external observation and first-person experience. A dashboard may show completion rate, but not dread. A policy file may show eligibility, but not the fear of applying. A workflow may show that a tool is available, but not that using it creates surveillance risk or hidden coordination work. An expert schema may classify a case correctly from the institution's perspective while misdescribing what the person is actually living through.\n\nThis asymmetry matters because decisions based only on the external view can optimize the wrong thing. A service can become faster but less dignified. A model can become more accurate but harder to contest. A classroom can improve average performance while leaving a subgroup feeling excluded or unsafe. Lived Experience Capture interrupts that failure by making the experienced reality inspectable before action is taken.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system, policy, product, process, or evaluation is being designed or judged through external indicators, expert abstractions, institutional categories, or aggregate metrics while the lived experience of affected people remains invisible, distorted, unsafe to express, or disconnected from decisions."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact method begins from first-person experience rather than theoretical or third-person observation.", "role_mapping": "People's experience -> first-person starting point; external metrics -> third-person description.", "slug": "phenomenology", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b038_a15_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: External metrics show what happened but not how people experienced it. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["External metrics show what happened but not how people experienced it."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Phenomenology", "one_liner": "Study of subjective experience.", "page_ref": "prime:phenomenology", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "People's experience -> first-person starting point; external metrics -> third-person description.", "slug": "phenomenology", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact method begins from first-person experience rather than theoretical or third-person observation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The target includes experience-as-experienced whose structure is not recoverable from external outcome metrics alone.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P074-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the participant-insider sense-making role.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Affected people have categories through which they make sense of their own situation.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail actual divergence between the two category systems.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "An outsider-defined category does not match the participants' sense-making category.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires an expert-origin classification.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The outsider-defined category is an expert category.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires an institution-origin vocabulary or classification.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The outsider-defined category is institutional vocabulary.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "An expert category or institutional vocabulary does not match how affected people make sense of their own situation.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "outsider category diverges from participants' own sense-making category", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P074-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The paired regime can find convergence as well as divergence; an actual mismatch is not mandatory.", "slug": "emic_and_etic"}], "residual_id": "r:lived_experience_capture:b038_a15_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b038_a15_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Expert categories or institutional vocabulary do not match how people make sense of their own situation. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Expert categories or institutional vocabulary do not match how people make sense of their own situation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Peer reassurance without expert-evaluator standing would preserve impostor syndrome but not satisfy the expert-category branch.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Impostor Syndrome", "one_liner": "The pattern in which a demonstrably capable, externally-validated person keeps a private conviction that their competence is fake, because a non-updating self-assessment channel rereads each new success as proof the deception still works rather than as evidence of ability.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:impostor_syndrome", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O3"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "expert_evaluator_validation", "predicate": "the external validation is issued by an expert evaluator", "rationale": "The one qualifier is anchored in the candidate's existing role inventory, fills exactly ['O3'], and leaves no complete candidate-plus-guard instance outside the selected DNF branch."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "impostor_syndrome"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "expert_evaluator_validation"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "impostor_syndrome", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P074-C15-U1", "why_it_fits": "The divergence is definitional; one source-type restriction on the existing external validation completes the expert branch. Standardized disagreement dimensions (SSD): CONTEXT_GUARD_SCOPE."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Expert or institutional categories diverge from participants' own sense-making categories.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact method begins from first-person experience rather than theoretical or third-person observation.", "role_mapping": "People's experience -> first-person starting point; external metrics -> third-person description.", "slug": "phenomenology", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b038_a15_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: External metrics show what happened but not how people experienced it. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["External metrics show what happened but not how people experienced it."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Phenomenology", "one_liner": "Study of subjective experience.", "page_ref": "prime:phenomenology", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "People's experience -> first-person starting point; external metrics -> third-person description.", "slug": "phenomenology", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact method begins from first-person experience rather than theoretical or third-person observation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The target includes experience-as-experienced whose structure is not recoverable from external outcome metrics alone.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P075-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the people as affected parties of the same design or policy whose process is under review.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A design or policy affects a focal group of people.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve absence of effective voice or incorporation, not merely limited attendance despite meaningful influence.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Those affected people are not meaningfully heard.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve design as the stage during which the affected people lack meaningful voice.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The failure to hear affected people occurs during design.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve evaluation as the stage during which the affected people lack meaningful voice.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The failure to hear affected people occurs during evaluation.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve revision as the stage during which the affected people lack meaningful voice.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The failure to hear affected people occurs during revision.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "People affected by a design or policy were not meaningfully heard during its creation or evaluation.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "People affected by a design or policy are not meaningfully heard during one listed governance stage.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P075-C01-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Phenomenological study can include participants fully and need not follow prior exclusion.", "slug": "phenomenology"}], "residual_id": "r:lived_experience_capture:b038_a15_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b038_a15_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A design or policy affects people who were not meaningfully heard during design, evaluation, or revision. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A design or policy affects people who were not meaningfully heard during design, evaluation, or revision."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Counterexample attempt: preserve a complete customer_discovery_theater instance under this mapping and the qualifier 'The discovery participants are people affected by the focal product design.' while falsifying 'People affected by a design or policy are not meaningfully heard during one listed governance stage.'. The attempt fails because the cited evidence plus the one guard fills O1 entails every obligation in branch O1, O2, O3. The exact record requires discovery evidence to be unable to redirect the roadmap. With participants restricted to people affected by the design, no complete instance can still give those people meaningful design influence.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Customer-Discovery Theater", "one_liner": "Diagnose fake product discovery by the single structural test of whether the inquiry is permitted to change the plan — the tell being a long track record of discovery that has never killed or redirected a roadmap.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:customer_discovery_theater", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "discovery_participants_are_affected_by_design", "predicate": "The discovery participants are people affected by the focal product design.", "rationale": "The SSD substitution preserves principal-role subtypes, relation direction, polarity/modality, and a complete DNF branch. The single qualifier 'The discovery participants are people affected by the focal product design.' is anchored in The exact record supplies customer interviews, surveys, and user research as the participant channel whose evidence is decoupled from the roadmap. and fills only O1; it adds no second role or unrelated relation. The post-qualifier counterexample fails, so universal necessity survives the publication-safety audit."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "customer_discovery_theater"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "discovery_participants_are_affected_by_design"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "customer_discovery_theater", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P075-C01-U1", "why_it_fits": "SSD passes: Customer-discovery participants map to the affected people; the pre-staked product plan maps to the design; evidence structurally unable to change that plan maps to not being meaningfully heard. The complete exact-record structure preserves the stated role mapping and one full DNF branch; the counterexample attempt does not survive the required qualifier, if any. The exact record and any emitted qualifier satisfy one complete DNF branch (O1, O2, O3) without combining evidence across branches. The single qualifier 'The discovery participants are people affected by the focal product design.' is anchored in The exact record supplies customer interviews, surveys, and user research as the participant channel whose evidence is decoupled from the roadmap. and fills only O1; it adds no second role or unrelated relation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "People affected by a design or policy were not meaningfully heard during its creation or evaluation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact method begins from first-person experience rather than theoretical or third-person observation.", "role_mapping": "People's experience -> first-person starting point; external metrics -> third-person description.", "slug": "phenomenology", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b038_a15_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: External metrics show what happened but not how people experienced it. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["External metrics show what happened but not how people experienced it."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Phenomenology", "one_liner": "Study of subjective experience.", "page_ref": "prime:phenomenology", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "People's experience -> first-person starting point; external metrics -> third-person description.", "slug": "phenomenology", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact method begins from first-person experience rather than theoretical or third-person observation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The target includes experience-as-experienced whose structure is not recoverable from external outcome metrics alone.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P075-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O9"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the signal as evidence of an actual problem, not as an unrelated behavior or unsupported suspicion.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The selected signal reveals that a focal problem exists.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the missing lived causal account despite recognition of the problem, not a cause already understood from experience.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The affected people's experienced cause of that problem remains unclear.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve one problem as the common object of the observed signal and the unresolved experienced cause.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The revealed problem and the unclear experienced cause concern the same focal situation.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve complaints as what reveals the focal problem.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Complaints are the problem signal.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve churn as what reveals the focal problem.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Churn is the problem signal.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve avoidance as what reveals the focal problem.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "Avoidance is the problem signal.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve nonuse as what reveals the focal problem.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "Nonuse is the problem signal.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve attrition as what reveals the focal problem.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "Attrition is the problem signal.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve informal workarounds as what reveals the focal problem.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "Informal workarounds are the problem signal.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Complaints, churn, avoidance, nonuse, attrition, or workarounds reveal a problem whose experienced cause remains unknown.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "One listed signal reveals a problem while its experienced cause remains unclear.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P075-C02-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Collective learning can have a known cause and does not require these behavioral symptoms.", "slug": "collective_systemic_learning"}], "residual_id": "r:lived_experience_capture:b038_a15_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b038_a15_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A problem is known through complaints, churn, avoidance, nonuse, attrition, or informal workarounds, but the experienced cause is unclear. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A problem is known through complaints, churn, avoidance, nonuse, attrition, or informal workarounds, but the experienced cause is unclear."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Collective learning can have a known cause and does not require these behavioral symptoms.", "slug": "collective_systemic_learning"}], "normalized_requirement": "Complaints, churn, avoidance, nonuse, attrition, or workarounds reveal a problem whose experienced cause remains unknown.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Complaints, churn, avoidance, nonuse, attrition, or workarounds reveal a problem whose experienced cause remains unknown.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Phenomenology's defining starting point is experience approached from within rather than the subject treated as an external object.", "role_mapping": "Inside experience -> first-person subject; outside observation -> suspended third-person reduction.", "slug": "phenomenology", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b038_a15_c6a", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Decision-makers risk confusing observation from the outside with experience from the inside. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Decision-makers risk confusing observation from the outside with experience from the inside."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Phenomenology", "one_liner": "Study of subjective experience.", "page_ref": "prime:phenomenology", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Inside experience -> first-person subject; outside observation -> suspended third-person reduction.", "slug": "phenomenology", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Phenomenology's defining starting point is experience approached from within rather than the subject treated as an external object."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Decision-makers must distinguish first-person experience from third-person observation of the same phenomenon.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The stakes include harm, exclusion, stigma, dignity, trust, access, or safety.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The stakes include harm, exclusion, stigma, dignity, trust, access, or safety. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The stakes include harm, exclusion, stigma, dignity, trust, access, or safety."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The stakes include harm, exclusion, stigma, dignity, trust, access, or safety."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 38, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-038", "ledger_sha256": "9eac1cd431cdfd74bfc850fd9813997b6fcb59dca9656454602e305650a3bdcf"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Load Balancing", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:load_balancing", "slug": "load_balancing"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 1 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 1}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Demand is unevenly concentrated on some receivers while other viable parallel capacity remains underused.", "explanation_source": {"field": "diagnostic_head", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Demand is unevenly concentrated on some receivers while other viable parallel capacity remains underused."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "This branch preserves the complete remedy-free diagnostic route; goals, feasibility clauses, gates, deployment constraints, and supporting context remain outside the DNF."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "EXT001-C060", "dnf": [["EXT001-U060-O1"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"obligation_id": "EXT001-U060-O1", "predicate": "Demand or workload is unevenly concentrated on one or more receivers while other viable capacity is underused."}], "predicate": "Demand or workload is unevenly concentrated on one or more receivers while other viable capacity is underused.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Demand or workload is unevenly concentrated on one or more receivers while other viable capacity is underused.", "unit_id": "EXT001-U060"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"catalog_exhaustion": "CONDITION_LEVEL", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Demand or workload is unevenly concentrated on one or more receivers while other viable capacity is underused.", "slug": "unevenness_waste"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Demand or workload is unevenly concentrated on one or more receivers while other viable capacity is underused.", "slug": "correlated_capacity_demand"}, {"falls_short_because": "The exact record describes an intervention, control, or achieved configuration rather than a pre-existing situation that necessarily entails the atom.", "slug": "load_balancing"}], "residual_id": "EXT001:load_balancing:C01", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding."}}, "condition_id": "ext001_load_balancing_a01", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored essence_one_line, compression_statement, components fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: Demand or workload is unevenly concentrated on one or more receivers while other viable capacity is underused.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Demand or workload is unevenly concentrated on one or more receivers while other viable capacity is underused."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Demand or workload is unevenly concentrated on one or more receivers while other viable capacity is underused.", "slug": "unevenness_waste"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Demand or workload is unevenly concentrated on one or more receivers while other viable capacity is underused.", "slug": "correlated_capacity_demand"}, {"falls_short_because": "The exact record describes an intervention, control, or achieved configuration rather than a pre-existing situation that necessarily entails the atom.", "slug": "load_balancing"}], "normalized_requirement": "Demand or workload is unevenly concentrated on one or more receivers while other viable capacity is underused.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Demand or workload is unevenly concentrated on one or more receivers while other viable capacity is underused.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The work can be divided or reassigned among multiple receivers.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored essence_one_line, compression_statement, components fields; the source file was not modified. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: The work can be divided or reassigned among multiple receivers. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The work can be divided or reassigned among multiple receivers.", "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored essence_one_line, compression_statement, components fields; the source file was not modified."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "The work can be divided or reassigned among multiple receivers."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"candidate_ledger_sha256": "96f72d2139077fd57bf795048ebef33b3fd574b20963170080ec916b5b3b92fe", "extension_id": "new-archetypes-extension-001", "ledger_id": "prime-production-v1.2-extension-001", "ledger_sha256": "9644520614744632d1d36da44b1acd77ce432852c6083eb871203521c166efce"}, "base_projection_sha256": "841e0c7f3cb8e8054475ad29a8a14745a416b4fc115559a44878b94292e673ec", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "ca09ed9fe1598ce7072755b530de5553f5ee0a7cd64ae82d9e4a4e2149a37788", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Load Leveling / Demand Smoothing", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:load_leveling_or_demand_smoothing", "slug": "load_leveling_or_demand_smoothing"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 1 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 1}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Temporal concentration or synchronization creates peaks above safe or efficient capacity even though average demand may be manageable.", "explanation_source": {"field": "diagnostic_head", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Temporal concentration or synchronization creates peaks above safe or efficient capacity even though average demand may be manageable."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "This branch preserves the complete remedy-free diagnostic route; goals, feasibility clauses, gates, deployment constraints, and supporting context remain outside the DNF."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Unevenness waste requires variable arrivals through finite capacity, a manageable mean, and nonlinear peak costs, which entails demand peaks above effective capacity despite a manageable average.", "role_mapping": "Arrival variance maps to bursty or synchronized demand; finite shared capacity maps to the safe or efficient ceiling.", "slug": "unevenness_waste", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "ext001_load_leveling_or_demand_smoothing_a01", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored essence_one_line, compression_statement, components fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: Bursty, synchronized, seasonal, or poorly timed demand creates peaks above safe or efficient capacity while average demand is manageable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Bursty, synchronized, seasonal, or poorly timed demand creates peaks above safe or efficient capacity while average demand is manageable."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Unevenness Waste", "one_liner": "Variance in arrivals or service through finite shared capacity imposes its own cost — additive to the cost of the mean and rising nonlinearly near the capacity ceiling — so capacity sized to mean demand is not capacity adequate to demand.", "page_ref": "prime:unevenness_waste", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Arrival variance maps to bursty or synchronized demand; finite shared capacity maps to the safe or efficient ceiling.", "slug": "unevenness_waste", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Unevenness waste requires variable arrivals through finite capacity, a manageable mean, and nonlinear peak costs, which entails demand peaks above effective capacity despite a manageable average."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Bursty, synchronized, seasonal, or poorly timed demand creates peaks above safe or efficient capacity while average demand is manageable.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "At least some demand can be shifted, staged, queued, or rescheduled.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored essence_one_line, compression_statement, components fields; the source file was not modified. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: At least some demand can be shifted, staged, queued, or rescheduled. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["At least some demand can be shifted, staged, queued, or rescheduled.", "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored essence_one_line, compression_statement, components fields; the source file was not modified."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "At least some demand can be shifted, staged, queued, or rescheduled."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"candidate_ledger_sha256": "96f72d2139077fd57bf795048ebef33b3fd574b20963170080ec916b5b3b92fe", "extension_id": "new-archetypes-extension-001", "ledger_id": "prime-production-v1.2-extension-001", "ledger_sha256": "9644520614744632d1d36da44b1acd77ce432852c6083eb871203521c166efce"}, "base_projection_sha256": "841e0c7f3cb8e8054475ad29a8a14745a416b4fc115559a44878b94292e673ec", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "ca09ed9fe1598ce7072755b530de5553f5ee0a7cd64ae82d9e4a4e2149a37788", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Load Shedding", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:load_shedding", "slug": "load_shedding"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 2 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 2}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Total load exceeds safe handling capacity, and attempting to serve everything would degrade or collapse critical function.", "explanation_source": {"field": "diagnostic_head", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Total load exceeds safe handling capacity, and attempting to serve everything would degrade or collapse critical function."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "This branch preserves the complete remedy-free diagnostic route; goals, feasibility clauses, gates, deployment constraints, and supporting context remain outside the DNF."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Operational overextension necessarily has frontier demand outrunning sustaining capacity until shock margin vanishes, which entails load or obligation beyond safe handling capacity.", "role_mapping": "The frontier's demand maps to total load or obligation; the sustaining backbone maps to safe handling capacity.", "slug": "operational_overextension", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "ext001_load_shedding_a01", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored essence_one_line, compression_statement, components fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: Total demand, work, traffic, exposure, or obligation exceeds safe handling capacity.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Total demand, work, traffic, exposure, or obligation exceeds safe handling capacity."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Operational Overextension", "one_liner": "A system advances a frontier of activity faster than the supporting backbone that sustains it can keep up, so the leading edge becomes brittle and fails on its next shock — the failure lying in the frontier-to-backbone ratio, not the frontier itself.", "page_ref": "prime:operational_overextension", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "The frontier's demand maps to total load or obligation; the sustaining backbone maps to safe handling capacity.", "slug": "operational_overextension", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Operational overextension necessarily has frontier demand outrunning sustaining capacity until shock margin vanishes, which entails load or obligation beyond safe handling capacity."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Total demand, work, traffic, exposure, or obligation exceeds safe handling capacity.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "EXT001-C061", "dnf": [["EXT001-U061-O1"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"obligation_id": "EXT001-U061-O1", "predicate": "Attempting to serve all load would degrade or collapse critical function."}], "predicate": "Attempting to serve all load would degrade or collapse critical function.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Attempting to serve all load would degrade or collapse critical function.", "unit_id": "EXT001-U061"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"catalog_exhaustion": "CONDITION_LEVEL", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Attempting to serve all load would degrade or collapse critical function.", "slug": "carrying_capacity"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Attempting to serve all load would degrade or collapse critical function.", "slug": "overshoot_and_collapse"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Attempting to serve all load would degrade or collapse critical function.", "slug": "model_assumption_failure"}], "residual_id": "EXT001:load_shedding:C02", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding."}}, "condition_id": "ext001_load_shedding_a02", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored essence_one_line, compression_statement, components fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: Attempting to serve all load would degrade or collapse critical function.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Attempting to serve all load would degrade or collapse critical function."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "EXTENSION_COUNTEREXAMPLE_AUDIT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Planned intermittent peak operation with recovery is excluded by the DSA, so every complete instance preserves the degradation relation.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Overburden Waste (Muri)", "one_liner": "The lean-operations failure mode where people, machines, or processes are held continuously above their sustainable (not peak) capacity, converting apparent utilization gains into lagged, hidden costs — wear, defects, attrition, and downstream cascades — by consuming the very buffer that absorbs variation.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:overburden_waste", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "overburden_waste"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "overburden_waste", "source_unit_id": "EXT001-U061", "why_it_fits": "Overburden waste necessarily converts attempted continuous service above sustainable capacity into defects, wear, attrition, and downstream cascades, degrading critical function."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "EXTENSION_COUNTEREXAMPLE_AUDIT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Below-threshold helpful arrivals are not complete instances of the DSA; above threshold, serving all arrivals necessarily degrades the response.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Volunteer-Management Overload", "one_liner": "The crisis failure mode in which would-be helpers arrive faster than a response system's finite credential-brief-assign-supervise intake channel can absorb them, so beyond a threshold each marginal arrival consumes net capacity rather than adding it.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:volunteer_management_overload", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "volunteer_management_overload"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "volunteer_management_overload", "source_unit_id": "EXT001-U061", "why_it_fits": "Volunteer-management overload necessarily makes absorbing every arrival consume net response capacity beyond the intake threshold, degrading the critical response effort."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Attempting to serve all load would degrade or collapse critical function.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Loads can be distinguished by criticality, reversibility, or service obligation.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored essence_one_line, compression_statement, components fields; the source file was not modified. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: Loads can be distinguished by criticality, reversibility, or service obligation. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Loads can be distinguished by criticality, reversibility, or service obligation.", "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored essence_one_line, compression_statement, components fields; the source file was not modified."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Loads can be distinguished by criticality, reversibility, or service obligation."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"candidate_ledger_sha256": "96f72d2139077fd57bf795048ebef33b3fd574b20963170080ec916b5b3b92fe", "extension_id": "new-archetypes-extension-001", "ledger_id": "prime-production-v1.2-extension-001", "ledger_sha256": "9644520614744632d1d36da44b1acd77ce432852c6083eb871203521c166efce"}, "base_projection_sha256": "841e0c7f3cb8e8054475ad29a8a14745a416b4fc115559a44878b94292e673ec", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "ca09ed9fe1598ce7072755b530de5553f5ee0a7cd64ae82d9e4a4e2149a37788", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Local-Chart Atlas Modeling", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:local_chart_atlas_modeling", "slug": "local_chart_atlas_modeling"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 7 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 7}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system is represented as if one flat, universal frame can describe all relevant cases, states, paths, segments, territories, or meanings. In reality, local neighborhoods are tractable while the global space is curved, folded, multi-regional, path-dependent, or connected in non-obvious ways. The single-frame representation then hides distortion: local models extrapolate outside their domain, handoffs lose variables, navigation crosses seams without translation, and global claims become artifacts of the chosen projection.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system is represented as if one flat, universal frame can describe all relevant cases, states, paths, segments, territories, or meanings. In reality, local neighborhoods are tractable while the global space is curved, folded, multi-regional, path-dependent, or connected in non-obvious ways. The single-frame representation then hides distortion: local models extrapolate outside their domain, handoffs lose variables, navigation crosses seams without translation, and global claims become artifacts of the chosen projection."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Local flat charts joined by transition maps while global curvature or topology remains in their gluing is the exact record.", "role_mapping": "Local neighborhoods -> chart domains; global system -> manifold; local model -> chart.", "slug": "manifold", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b039_a01_c1a", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Local models, categories, maps, or workflows work well in some neighborhoods but fail when applied globally. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Local models, categories, maps, or workflows work well in some neighborhoods but fail when applied globally."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Manifold", "one_liner": "A space that is locally flat but globally curved or topologically non-trivial.", "page_ref": "prime:manifold", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Local neighborhoods -> chart domains; global system -> manifold; local model -> chart.", "slug": "manifold", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Local flat charts joined by transition maps while global curvature or topology remains in their gluing is the exact record."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The represented space is locally tractable in coordinate patches but can be globally curved or topologically non-trivial.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P075-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve actual local validity or success before the broader application, not a representation that fails everywhere.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The selected representation works in at least one local neighborhood.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve application outside the valid local scope, including global use, rather than use wholly within that scope.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The representation is applied beyond the neighborhood where it is valid.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve actual failure outside the valid neighborhood, not merely lower confidence or untested extrapolation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The representation fails in the broader application.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the scope-crossing application as the condition under which local success no longer holds.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The failure occurs under the out-of-neighborhood application.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve a model as the representation that works locally and fails beyond its valid neighborhood.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The locally valid representation is a model.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve a category as the representation that works locally and fails beyond its valid neighborhood.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The locally valid representation is a category.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve a map as the representation that works locally and fails beyond its valid neighborhood.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The locally valid representation is a map.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve a workflow as the representation that works locally and fails beyond its valid neighborhood.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The locally valid representation is a workflow.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Actors apply a locally valid model outside its valid neighborhood and it fails there.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "One listed representation works locally but fails when applied beyond its valid neighborhood.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P075-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A manifold can be modeled with correctly scoped charts; misuse outside a chart is not mandatory.", "slug": "manifold"}], "residual_id": "r:local_chart_atlas_modeling:b039_a01_c1b", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b039_a01_c1b", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Local models, categories, maps, or workflows work well in some neighborhoods but fail when applied globally. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Local models, categories, maps, or workflows work well in some neighborhoods but fail when applied globally."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_SYNTHESIS", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Try a complete responsive-layout breakage where the original meaning-encoding layout works, a context boundary is crossed, and hierarchy is lost, yet the source model branch is false. Under the general bridge, the layout is a hierarchy model, so that counterexample cannot preserve the DSA and bridge.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_BRIDGE", "name": "Responsive-Layout Breakage", "one_liner": "Diagnose the silent UI failure where an interface's content survives a viewport, device, or locale transformation but its layout-encoded meaning — priority, adjacency, hierarchy, above-the-fold prominence — is lost, so a passing content-accessibility check actively conceals the defect.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:responsive_layout_breakage", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O5"], "guard_type": "TYPE_SUBSUMPTION", "kind": "INTERPRETIVE_BRIDGE", "normalized_key": "meaning_encoding_layout_is_hierarchy_model", "predicate": "Any layout that encodes a content hierarchy is a model of that hierarchy.", "rationale": "The exact DSA already supplies local success, boundary crossing, and representation failure. The bridge contributes only a general type inclusion, does not select an unnamed favorable manifestation, and remains true outside this edge."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "responsive_layout_breakage"}, {"kind": "INTERPRETIVE_BRIDGE", "value": "meaning_encoding_layout_is_hierarchy_model"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "responsive_layout_breakage", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P075-C03-U1", "why_it_fits": "SSD passes after one general bridge: the locally correct meaning-bearing layout is the local representation; crossing viewport, device, or locale leaves its valid neighborhood; lost hierarchy is failure there. The bridge classifies any hierarchy-encoding layout as a model and fills O5 only."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Counterexample attempt: preserve a complete fallacy_of_homogeneous_networks instance under this mapping while falsifying 'One listed representation works locally but fails when applied beyond its valid neighborhood.'. The attempt fails because the cited evidence directly entails every obligation in branch O1, O2, O3, O4, O5. I attempted to preserve a complete fallacy_of_homogeneous_networks instance while falsifying every DNF branch, but the exact structural commitments rule that counterexample out.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Fallacy of Homogeneous Networks", "one_liner": "The implicit assumption that all nodes, links, OSes, versions, and configs across a distributed deployment are uniform — a missing degree of freedom in the system's model of its substrate that stays latent until deployment crosses a boundary where the uniformity breaks.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:fallacy_of_homogeneous_networks", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "fallacy_of_homogeneous_networks"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "fallacy_of_homogeneous_networks", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P075-C03-U1", "why_it_fits": "SSD passes: The deployment assumption maps to the focal model, the homogeneous environment to its valid local neighborhood, and the first heterogeneous deployment boundary to broader application and failure. The exact record explicitly requires correct local operation followed by failure when the system model crosses the boundary where uniformity breaks. The exact record and any emitted qualifier satisfy one complete DNF branch (O1, O2, O3, O4, O5) without combining evidence across branches. No qualifier is used, so qualifier laundering and bridge generality are not applicable."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Actors apply a locally valid model outside its valid neighborhood and it fails there.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A manifold does not entail that anyone has imposed a single global frame.", "slug": "manifold"}], "residual_id": "r:local_chart_atlas_modeling:b039_a01_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b039_a01_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A single coordinate system, taxonomy, dashboard, policy, routing model, or user journey forces incompatible regions into one frame. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A single coordinate system, taxonomy, dashboard, policy, routing model, or user journey forces incompatible regions into one frame."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A manifold does not entail that anyone has imposed a single global frame.", "slug": "manifold"}], "normalized_requirement": "A single representational frame forces incompatible regions into one coordinate, category, policy, route, or journey.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A single representational frame forces incompatible regions into one coordinate, category, policy, route, or journey.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Overlapping charts require coordinate-change maps; their gluing is constitutive.", "role_mapping": "Segments or regimes -> chart domains; transition -> coordinate-change map.", "slug": "manifold", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The exact record maps between incommensurable frameworks while preserving selected invariants and managing loss.", "role_mapping": "Regimes or contexts -> source and target frameworks; transition -> structural translation.", "slug": "translation_and_conceptual_bridging", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b039_a01_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Transitions between segments, states, jurisdictions, contexts, levels, or regimes require translation rather than simple continuation. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Transitions between segments, states, jurisdictions, contexts, levels, or regimes require translation rather than simple continuation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Manifold", "one_liner": "A space that is locally flat but globally curved or topologically non-trivial.", "page_ref": "prime:manifold", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Segments or regimes -> chart domains; transition -> coordinate-change map.", "slug": "manifold", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Overlapping charts require coordinate-change maps; their gluing is constitutive."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Translation and Conceptual Bridging", "one_liner": "Convert concepts or meanings between incommensurable frameworks.", "page_ref": "prime:translation_and_conceptual_bridging", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Regimes or contexts -> source and target frameworks; transition -> structural translation.", "slug": "translation_and_conceptual_bridging", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record maps between incommensurable frameworks while preserving selected invariants and managing loss."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Crossing between local regimes requires an explicit translation or transition map rather than unmodified continuation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P075-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve at least two representation choices applied to the same objects, cases, or neighborhood.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Alternative local representations can be used for the same focal subject.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve representation choice as determining or changing the focal claim rather than merely changing its presentation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The selected claim depends on which local representation is used.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a consequential difference in value, ordering, or neighborhood result, not a negligible formatting difference.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The claim varies materially across the representations.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve distance as the claim that changes materially with representation choice.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Distance is the representation-dependent claim.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve similarity as the claim that changes materially with representation choice.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Similarity is the representation-dependent claim.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve ranking as the claim that changes materially with representation choice.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "Ranking is the representation-dependent claim.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve a nearest-neighbor claim as what changes materially with representation choice.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "Nearest-neighbor status is the representation-dependent claim.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Distance, similarity, rank, or neighborhood claims vary materially with the local representation used.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "One listed claim varies materially with the local representation used.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P075-C04-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Locality of reference concerns clustered access demand, not coordinate-dependent measurement.", "slug": "locality_of_reference"}], "residual_id": "r:local_chart_atlas_modeling:b039_a01_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b039_a01_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Distances, similarities, rankings, or nearest-neighbor claims depend heavily on which local representation is used. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Distances, similarities, rankings, or nearest-neighbor claims depend heavily on which local representation is used."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Locality of reference concerns clustered access demand, not coordinate-dependent measurement.", "slug": "locality_of_reference"}], "normalized_requirement": "Distance, similarity, rank, or neighborhood claims vary materially with the local representation used.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Distance, similarity, rank, or neighborhood claims vary materially with the local representation used.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A path is an ordered route but does not require two routes to the same apparent state to alter what is valid next.", "slug": "path"}], "residual_id": "r:local_chart_atlas_modeling:b039_a01_c5", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b039_a01_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Path history matters: reaching the same apparent state through different routes changes what is valid next. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Path history matters: reaching the same apparent state through different routes changes what is valid next."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A path is an ordered route but does not require two routes to the same apparent state to alter what is valid next.", "slug": "path"}], "normalized_requirement": "The validity of the next move depends on the historical route by which the present state was reached.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The validity of the next move depends on the historical route by which the present state was reached.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A manifold may be globally flat, simply connected, and describable by one chart.", "slug": "manifold"}], "residual_id": "r:local_chart_atlas_modeling:b039_a01_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b039_a01_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The system has holes, loops, seams, folds, boundary cases, or disconnected-looking regions that still interact. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The system has holes, loops, seams, folds, boundary cases, or disconnected-looking regions that still interact."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A manifold may be globally flat, simply connected, and describable by one chart.", "slug": "manifold"}], "normalized_requirement": "Global organization includes a hole, loop, fold, seam, boundary case, or apparently disconnected region that still interacts.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Global organization includes a hole, loop, fold, seam, boundary case, or apparently disconnected region that still interacts.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A dimensionality-reduction, embedding, or visualization is used for navigation or decision-making and needs neighborhood and seam validation.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: A dimensionality-reduction, embedding, or visualization is used for navigation or decision-making and needs neighborhood and seam validation. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A dimensionality-reduction, embedding, or visualization is used for navigation or decision-making and needs neighborhood and seam validation."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "A dimensionality-reduction, embedding, or visualization is used for navigation or decision-making and needs neighborhood and seam validation."}, {"display_text": "Stakeholders repeatedly argue from a locally valid map as though it were the whole terrain.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Stakeholders repeatedly argue from a locally valid map as though it were the whole terrain. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders repeatedly argue from a locally valid map as though it were the whole terrain."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 8, "text": "Stakeholders repeatedly argue from a locally valid map as though it were the whole terrain."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 39, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-039", "ledger_sha256": "d3193996ed4801fb57ab3256da8053c3558c43ae0e9d3f18c6c559a8aa42e06d"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Local-Disturbance / Global-Effect Tracing", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:local_disturbance_global_effect_tracing", "slug": "local_disturbance_global_effect_tracing"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a mismatch between local visibility and larger-scale consequence. The disturbance is visible at its origin, but its impact is determined by pathways and conditions that may sit elsewhere in the system.\n\nA local disturbance becomes globally important only when some structure carries it beyond its origin. That structure may be a dependency, network exposure, material flow, shared information system, social attention channel, ecological corridor, financial relationship, governance rule, or timing constraint. Once it moves, the disturbance may grow through amplification, fade through damping, or change form at a scale transition.\n\nThe danger is two-sided. Underreaction ignores weak local signals until propagation is already underway. Overreaction treats every local disturbance as a system threat and exhausts attention, trust, and response capacity.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A localized disturbance appears small in its immediate context, but its propagation structure may let it cascade, amplify, dissipate slowly, or reorganize behavior at larger scales."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A cascade begins with a local trigger in one element and transmits through coupled neighbors.", "role_mapping": "Local event -> trigger; larger system -> coupled elements.", "slug": "cascade", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b039_a02_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A local failure, event, behavior, exposure, shortage, rumor, defect, or shock occurs inside a larger coupled system. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A local failure, event, behavior, exposure, shortage, rumor, defect, or shock occurs inside a larger coupled system."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Cascade", "one_liner": "A change in one element triggers a chain of further changes.", "page_ref": "prime:cascade", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Local event -> trigger; larger system -> coupled elements.", "slug": "cascade", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A cascade begins with a local trigger in one element and transmits through coupled neighbors."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A localized change or failure occurs in one element of a larger coupled system.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Dense coupling and network topology create paths by which local failure can threaten the whole.", "role_mapping": "Dependencies -> coupling graph; local elements -> nodes; system threat -> systemic propagation.", "slug": "systemic_risk", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "Sequential coupling lets each affected element re-emit the disturbance to the next.", "role_mapping": "Dependency chain -> coupled transmission; affected component -> re-emitting element.", "slug": "cascade", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b039_a02_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The system contains dependency chains, dense networks, shared resources, synchronization, or correlated vulnerabilities. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The system contains dependency chains, dense networks, shared resources, synchronization, or correlated vulnerabilities."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Systemic Risk", "one_liner": "Risk that local failures propagate into system-wide collapse.", "page_ref": "prime:systemic_risk", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Dependencies -> coupling graph; local elements -> nodes; system threat -> systemic propagation.", "slug": "systemic_risk", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Dense coupling and network topology create paths by which local failure can threaten the whole."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Cascade", "one_liner": "A change in one element triggers a chain of further changes.", "page_ref": "prime:cascade", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Dependency chain -> coupled transmission; affected component -> re-emitting element.", "slug": "cascade", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Sequential coupling lets each affected element re-emit the disturbance to the next."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Dependencies, shared resources, synchronization, or correlated vulnerabilities couple local elements into transmission paths.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact pattern is a local shock amplified through coupling into correlated whole-system failure.", "role_mapping": "Small disturbance -> local shock; outsized effect -> systemic failure; conditions -> coupling topology.", "slug": "systemic_risk", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "A local trigger becomes system-wide only when coupling exceeds thresholds, otherwise it damps.", "role_mapping": "Small disturbance -> local trigger; particular conditions -> supercritical coupling; outsized effect -> cascade.", "slug": "cascade", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "Amplification necessarily maps a comparatively small input into a larger output under a gain mechanism.", "role_mapping": "Small disturbance -> input; outsized effect -> amplified output; local or system condition -> gain mechanism.", "slug": "amplification", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b039_a02_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Small disturbances sometimes produce outsized effects, but only under particular local or system conditions. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Small disturbances sometimes produce outsized effects, but only under particular local or system conditions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Systemic Risk", "one_liner": "Risk that local failures propagate into system-wide collapse.", "page_ref": "prime:systemic_risk", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Small disturbance -> local shock; outsized effect -> systemic failure; conditions -> coupling topology.", "slug": "systemic_risk", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact pattern is a local shock amplified through coupling into correlated whole-system failure."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Cascade", "one_liner": "A change in one element triggers a chain of further changes.", "page_ref": "prime:cascade", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Small disturbance -> local trigger; particular conditions -> supercritical coupling; outsized effect -> cascade.", "slug": "cascade", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A local trigger becomes system-wide only when coupling exceeds thresholds, otherwise it damps."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Amplification", "one_liner": "Increase signal or disturbance.", "page_ref": "prime:amplification", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Small disturbance -> input; outsized effect -> amplified output; local or system condition -> gain mechanism.", "slug": "amplification", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Amplification necessarily maps a comparatively small input into a larger output under a gain mechanism."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A small local disturbance can produce a disproportionately large effect when the system enters the relevant coupling or threshold regime.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Stakeholders disagree over whether to treat an event as isolated, cascading, or system-threatening.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "One group may say the event is isolated; another may say it is an early sign of systemic failure. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Stakeholders disagree over whether to treat an event as isolated, cascading, or system-threatening. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders disagree over whether to treat an event as isolated, cascading, or system-threatening.", "One group may say the event is isolated; another may say it is an early sign of systemic failure."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Stakeholders disagree over whether to treat an event as isolated, cascading, or system-threatening."}, {"display_text": "Containment or response resources are limited.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this deployment constraint: Containment or response resources are limited. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Containment or response resources are limited."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Containment or response resources are limited."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 39, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-039", "ledger_sha256": "d3193996ed4801fb57ab3256da8053c3558c43ae0e9d3f18c6c559a8aa42e06d"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Local Optimum Escape", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:local_optimum_escape", "slug": "local_optimum_escape"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a **local-performance valley**. A system cannot reach a superior configuration because the first steps away from the incumbent reduce measured performance, comfort, familiarity, or legitimacy. Greedy improvement rejects those steps, so the system stays trapped.\n\nThis pattern appears in mathematical search, organizational routines, product design, policy operations, and strategy. In each case, the problem is not the absence of effort; it is that local criteria punish the moves required for broader search.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A process improves locally but cannot reach better global solutions because the steps required to leave the current configuration look worse under the current evaluation lens, operating constraints, or path-dependent routines."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact halting condition is that every neighbor is no better, so local search stalls.", "role_mapping": "Incremental move -> neighborhood move; plateau -> local-search halt.", "slug": "local_optimum", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b039_a03_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Incremental improvements have plateaued. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Incremental improvements have plateaued."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Local Optimum", "one_liner": "A point best within its neighborhood but not across the whole landscape.", "page_ref": "prime:local_optimum", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Incremental move -> neighborhood move; plateau -> local-search halt.", "slug": "local_optimum", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact halting condition is that every neighbor is no better, so local search stalls."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A local-improvement process has plateaued because no ordinary incremental move improves the incumbent.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "No-better-neighbor is the prime's defining halting condition.", "role_mapping": "Nearby change -> neighbor; performance -> landscape value; incumbent -> local optimum.", "slug": "local_optimum", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b039_a03_c2a", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Every nearby change appears to reduce performance, legitimacy, comfort, or efficiency. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Every nearby change appears to reduce performance, legitimacy, comfort, or efficiency."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Local Optimum", "one_liner": "A point best within its neighborhood but not across the whole landscape.", "page_ref": "prime:local_optimum", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Nearby change -> neighbor; performance -> landscape value; incumbent -> local optimum.", "slug": "local_optimum", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "No-better-neighbor is the prime's defining halting condition."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Every neighboring configuration is evaluated as no better than the incumbent.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A local optimum has a basin of attraction, so local search from different starts can terminate in different optima.", "role_mapping": "Starting path -> basin entry; result -> attained local optimum.", "slug": "local_optimum", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b039_a03_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The starting path heavily shapes the result. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The starting path heavily shapes the result."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Local Optimum", "one_liner": "A point best within its neighborhood but not across the whole landscape.", "page_ref": "prime:local_optimum", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Starting path -> basin entry; result -> attained local optimum.", "slug": "local_optimum", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A local optimum has a basin of attraction, so local search from different starts can terminate in different optima."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The basin reached by local search depends materially on its starting point and prior route.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P075-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a metric that actively scores, rewards, or selects among the focal alternatives.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A current operative metric evaluates available behavior or outcomes.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve maintenance of the current locally stable configuration as one side of the metric comparison.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Incumbent local stability is one evaluated target.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve exploration or discovery of more distant alternatives as the other side of the comparison.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Long-range discovery is the contrasting evaluated target.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the stated reward ordering, not equal treatment or a metric that favors exploration.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The metric rewards local stability more than long-range discovery.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "The operative metric favors incumbent local stability over long-range discovery.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "The operative metric rewards incumbent local stability more than long-range discovery.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P075-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A local optimum can arise under a correct objective without any metric preference for stability.", "slug": "local_optimum"}], "residual_id": "r:local_optimum_escape:b039_a03_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b039_a03_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The current metric rewards local stability more than long-range discovery. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The current metric rewards local stability more than long-range discovery."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A local optimum can arise under a correct objective without any metric preference for stability.", "slug": "local_optimum"}], "normalized_requirement": "The operative metric favors incumbent local stability over long-range discovery.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The operative metric favors incumbent local stability over long-range discovery.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record distinguishes neighborhood-best from global-best and requires a nonlocal escape mechanism to reach the latter.", "role_mapping": "Better configuration -> global optimum; gradual adjustment -> local-improvement moves.", "slug": "local_optimum", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b039_a03_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Stakeholders suspect a better configuration exists but cannot reach it by gradual adjustment. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders suspect a better configuration exists but cannot reach it by gradual adjustment."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Local Optimum", "one_liner": "A point best within its neighborhood but not across the whole landscape.", "page_ref": "prime:local_optimum", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Better configuration -> global optimum; gradual adjustment -> local-improvement moves.", "slug": "local_optimum", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record distinguishes neighborhood-best from global-best and requires a nonlocal escape mechanism to reach the latter."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A globally better configuration exists or is credibly suspected but cannot be reached by monotone local improvement.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Exploration is politically, operationally, or financially risky unless bounded.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this deployment constraint: Exploration is politically, operationally, or financially risky unless bounded. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Exploration is politically, operationally, or financially risky unless bounded."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Exploration is politically, operationally, or financially risky unless bounded."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 39, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-039", "ledger_sha256": "d3193996ed4801fb57ab3256da8053c3558c43ae0e9d3f18c6c559a8aa42e06d"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Local Rule Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:local_rule_design", "slug": "local_rule_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a local-global mismatch. The system needs coherence at the whole-system level, but the information and action needed to create that coherence are distributed across many local interactions. If every local actor improvises independently, the result may be congestion, gaps, duplication, norm drift, unfair allocation, or fragile coordination. If a central actor tries to specify every action, the result may be delay, overload, and loss of local adaptation.\n\nLocal Rule Design resolves this by making the local interaction layer the design target. Instead of controlling the whole pattern directly, it changes the rule conditions under which the pattern emerges.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Many local actors or components interact, and the important global behavior emerges from their local choices rather than from direct central command. The system needs order, coverage, flow, cooperation, allocation, or safety, but a central actor cannot or should not specify every action."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P075-C08", "dnf": [], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [], "predicate": "Central coordination has become too slow.", "resolution": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RESIDUAL", "semantic_scope": "NON_ABSTRACTION", "structural_head": "Central coordination has become too slow.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P075-C08-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P075-C08", "dnf": [], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [], "predicate": "Central coordination has become too expensive.", "resolution": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RESIDUAL", "semantic_scope": "NON_ABSTRACTION", "structural_head": "Central coordination has become too expensive.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P075-C08-U2"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P075-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve centralized coordination as the mechanism whose robustness is at issue.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A focal central mechanism coordinates system activity.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve vulnerability to actual coordination breakdown under perturbation, not merely rigid procedure with no failure risk.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Disturbance or change can cause that coordination mechanism to break down.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve insufficient ability to absorb disturbance or change as why central coordination can fail.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The breakdown vulnerability arises from the mechanism's brittleness.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Central coordination has become brittle.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Central coordination is vulnerable to breakdown under disturbance or change.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P075-C08-U3"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P075-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a central coordinating role distinct from the local information holders.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A central actor or mechanism coordinates system activity.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve local information holders with observations relevant to the coordination task.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Local actors or components hold information about current local conditions.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a recency advantage at the local level rather than equivalent information at both levels.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The locally held information is fresher than the information available centrally.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve separation that impedes direct central access to the freshest local information.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The central coordinator is organizationally or informationally distant from that local information.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Central coordination is distant from the freshest local information.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "The central coordinator is distant from the freshest information held locally.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P075-C08-U4"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P075-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a central coordination role with bounded capacity to process incoming coordination work.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A central actor or mechanism processes coordination demand.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve incoming coordination tasks, requests, or decisions directed to the same central role.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The system generates coordination demand for that central role.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve actual overload as demand above capacity, not high utilization that remains within capacity.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The coordination demand exceeds the central role's processing capacity.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Central coordination is overloaded.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Coordination demand exceeds the central coordinator's processing capacity.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P075-C08-U5"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Mission command is an architecture for that problem and can be used before central coordination has demonstrably failed.", "slug": "mission_command"}], "residual_id": "r:local_rule_design:b039_a04_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b039_a04_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Central coordination has become too slow, expensive, brittle, distant from local information, or overloaded. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Central coordination has become too slow, expensive, brittle, distant from local information, or overloaded."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Counterexample attempt: preserve a complete common_operating_picture_breakdown instance under this mapping and the qualifier 'The common-operating-picture breakdown is its lag failure mode under evolving conditions.' while falsifying 'Central coordination is vulnerable to breakdown under disturbance or change.'. The attempt fails because the cited evidence plus the one guard fills O2, O3 entails every obligation in branch O1, O2, O3. Without the qualifier a complete common_operating_picture_breakdown instance can fall outside this unit; with the one named qualifier, no complete DNF branch remains falsifiable.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Common-Operating-Picture Breakdown", "one_liner": "The failure mode where a multi-party response acts incoherently because its engineered shared picture fails to synthesise participants' partial views — relocating the fault from the responders to the artefact, whose currency, completeness, and consistency become the lever.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:common_operating_picture_breakdown", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2", "O3"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "cop_breakdown_is_lag_mode", "predicate": "The common-operating-picture breakdown is its lag failure mode under evolving conditions.", "rationale": "The SSD substitution preserves principal-role subtypes, relation direction, polarity/modality, and a complete DNF branch. The single qualifier 'The common-operating-picture breakdown is its lag failure mode under evolving conditions.' is anchored in Lag is one of the exact record's five closed failure modes and is defined by an out-of-date shared picture during an evolving incident. and fills only O2, O3; it adds no second role or unrelated relation. The post-qualifier counterexample fails, so universal necessity survives the publication-safety audit."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "common_operating_picture_breakdown"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The common-operating-picture breakdown is its lag failure mode under evolving conditions."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "common_operating_picture_breakdown", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P075-C08-U3", "why_it_fits": "SSD passes: The engineered shared picture maps to the central coordination mechanism, and its guarded lag mode maps to brittle breakdown while the incident state changes. The candidate supplies a central shared-state coordinator; selecting its named lag mode makes evolving disturbance and update brittleness necessary. The exact record and any emitted qualifier satisfy one complete DNF branch (O1, O2, O3) without combining evidence across branches. The single qualifier 'The common-operating-picture breakdown is its lag failure mode under evolving conditions.' is anchored in Lag is one of the exact record's five closed failure modes and is defined by an out-of-date shared picture during an evolving incident. and fills only O2, O3; it adds no second role or unrelated relation."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_SYNTHESIS", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Without the guard, a master plan can omit a long-standing allergen-sequencing rule, yielding a complete plan-execute gap even though local information is not fresher. With the guard, the local constraint arose after planning, so the central artefact necessarily lacks the fresher local information.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Plan-Execute Gap", "one_liner": "The pathology in which a coarse-grained planning artefact cannot be enacted because the execution layer faces binding fine-grained constraints the planning model never represented — so the fix is constraint propagation and feedback, never a better forecast.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:plan_execute_gap", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O3"], "guard_type": "TIMING_BINDING", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "local_constraints_changed_after_plan", "predicate": "The execution-layer constraints arose or changed after the central plan was built.", "rationale": "The guard has one candidate-anchored subject and one timing relation, fills only O3, and neither restates the whole head nor imports a role. The guarded counterexample fails while the unguarded counterexample demonstrates minimality."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "plan_execute_gap"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "local_constraints_changed_after_plan"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "plan_execute_gap", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P075-C08-U4", "why_it_fits": "SSD preserves the central planning artefact, execution-layer local knowledge, and informational distance caused by omitted constraints. Directness fails because stable fine-grained constraints need not be fresher; the single timing guard makes O3 necessary without adding a new role or relation."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Counterexample attempt: preserve a complete common_operating_picture_breakdown instance under this mapping and the qualifier 'The common-operating-picture breakdown is its lag failure mode.' while falsifying 'The central coordinator is distant from the freshest information held locally.'. The attempt fails because the cited evidence plus the one guard fills O3, O4 entails every obligation in branch O1, O2, O3, O4. Without the qualifier a complete common_operating_picture_breakdown instance can fall outside this unit; with the one named qualifier, no complete DNF branch remains falsifiable.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Common-Operating-Picture Breakdown", "one_liner": "The failure mode where a multi-party response acts incoherently because its engineered shared picture fails to synthesise participants' partial views — relocating the fault from the responders to the artefact, whose currency, completeness, and consistency become the lever.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:common_operating_picture_breakdown", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O3", "O4"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "cop_breakdown_is_lag_mode", "predicate": "The common-operating-picture breakdown is its lag failure mode.", "rationale": "The SSD substitution preserves principal-role subtypes, relation direction, polarity/modality, and a complete DNF branch. The single qualifier 'The common-operating-picture breakdown is its lag failure mode.' is anchored in The exact record names lag as the branch where responders act on a shared picture that is hours out of date. and fills only O3, O4; it adds no second role or unrelated relation. The post-qualifier counterexample fails, so universal necessity survives the publication-safety audit."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "common_operating_picture_breakdown"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The common-operating-picture breakdown is its lag failure mode."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "common_operating_picture_breakdown", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P075-C08-U4", "why_it_fits": "SSD passes: The shared picture maps to the central coordinator, participants' partial first-hand views to local information, and the lag branch to centrally stale information separated by the update path. The candidate supplies local first-hand partial views and a central synthesis artifact; one named branch selection establishes that the central copy lags those local views. The exact record and any emitted qualifier satisfy one complete DNF branch (O1, O2, O3, O4) without combining evidence across branches. The single qualifier 'The common-operating-picture breakdown is its lag failure mode.' is anchored in The exact record names lag as the branch where responders act on a shared picture that is hours out of date. and fills only O3, O4; it adds no second role or unrelated relation."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Counterexample attempt: preserve a complete convergence_failure instance under this mapping while falsifying 'Coordination demand exceeds the central coordinator's processing capacity.'. The attempt fails because the cited evidence directly entails every obligation in branch O1, O2, O3. The exact record defines the pathology by inflows arriving faster and in greater volume than incident command can absorb, so no complete instance remains below the coordinator's capacity.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Convergence Failure", "one_liner": "The disaster-management pathology in which uncoordinated pro-social inflows — volunteers, donations, inquiries — arrive faster than incident command can absorb, consuming the same coordination bandwidth the primary hazard needs and triggering a second disaster.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:convergence_failure", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "convergence_failure"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "convergence_failure", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P075-C08-U5", "why_it_fits": "SSD passes: Incident command maps to the central coordinator; unsolicited personal, material, and informational inflows map to coordination demand; arrival faster than registration, routing, or use maps to demand exceeding coordination bandwidth. The complete exact-record structure preserves the stated role mapping and one full DNF branch; the counterexample attempt does not survive the required qualifier, if any. The exact record and any emitted qualifier satisfy one complete DNF branch (O1, O2, O3) without combining evidence across branches. No qualifier is used, so qualifier laundering and bridge generality are not applicable."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Central coordination is too slow, costly, brittle, overloaded, or distant from the freshest local information.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Many locally interacting components generate macro-order without a global blueprint.", "role_mapping": "Local actors -> components; decisions -> local rules; combined effect -> emergent macro-pattern.", "slug": "self_organization", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b039_a04_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Local actors repeatedly make decisions whose combined effect is more important than any single decision. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Local actors repeatedly make decisions whose combined effect is more important than any single decision."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Self-Organization", "one_liner": "Order without central control.", "page_ref": "prime:self_organization", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Local actors -> components; decisions -> local rules; combined effect -> emergent macro-pattern.", "slug": "self_organization", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Many locally interacting components generate macro-order without a global blueprint."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Repeated local decisions interact so their aggregate pattern matters more than any single choice.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Macro-order emerges from local-information rules and interaction rather than central prescription.", "role_mapping": "Interaction rules -> local rules; system-level pattern -> emergent order.", "slug": "self_organization", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "Mechanism design selects message and outcome rules so strategic local behavior implements a target collective outcome.", "role_mapping": "Participants -> agents; interaction rules -> mechanism; desired pattern -> social-choice outcome.", "slug": "mechanism_design", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b039_a04_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The desired system-level pattern depends on interaction rules, not merely on individual motivation or one-time planning. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The desired system-level pattern depends on interaction rules, not merely on individual motivation or one-time planning."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Self-Organization", "one_liner": "Order without central control.", "page_ref": "prime:self_organization", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Interaction rules -> local rules; system-level pattern -> emergent order.", "slug": "self_organization", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Macro-order emerges from local-information rules and interaction rather than central prescription."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Mechanism Design", "one_liner": "Rule engineering.", "page_ref": "prime:mechanism_design", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Participants -> agents; interaction rules -> mechanism; desired pattern -> social-choice outcome.", "slug": "mechanism_design", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Mechanism design selects message and outcome rules so strategic local behavior implements a target collective outcome."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The desired macro-pattern is produced by interaction rules rather than by one-time individual motivation or a central action list.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Local-information-only decision rules and absence of global state access are mandatory components.", "role_mapping": "Participants -> local components; local observation -> neighborhood information; whole system -> absent global view.", "slug": "self_organization", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b039_a04_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Participants can observe enough local information to act usefully, but cannot see or optimize the whole system alone. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Participants can observe enough local information to act usefully, but cannot see or optimize the whole system alone."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Self-Organization", "one_liner": "Order without central control.", "page_ref": "prime:self_organization", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Participants -> local components; local observation -> neighborhood information; whole system -> absent global view.", "slug": "self_organization", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Local-information-only decision rules and absence of global state access are mandatory components."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Participants possess actionable local information but lack global state access sufficient to optimize the whole alone.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The system needs decentralized adaptation while preserving a shared safety, compatibility, or coordination envelope.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: The system needs decentralized adaptation while preserving a shared safety, compatibility, or coordination envelope. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The system needs decentralized adaptation while preserving a shared safety, compatibility, or coordination envelope."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The system needs decentralized adaptation while preserving a shared safety, compatibility, or coordination envelope."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 39, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-039", "ledger_sha256": "d3193996ed4801fb57ab3256da8053c3558c43ae0e9d3f18c6c559a8aa42e06d"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Locution-Illocution-Perlocution Decomposition", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:locution_illocution_perlocution_decomposition", "slug": "locution_illocution_perlocution_decomposition"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 2 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 2}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A communication event is treated as a single object. Literal wording, performative force, speaker authority, social convention, audience uptake, and downstream effect are merged together. This creates brittle interpretation and poor repair: people rewrite the words when the force was unclear, argue about intent when the effect matters, or punish an effect without testing whether the utterance had the claimed force.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A communication dispute collapses literal content, performed social action, felicity conditions, audience uptake, and downstream effect into one undifferentiated object."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "This branch preserves the complete remedy-free diagnostic route; goals, feasibility clauses, gates, deployment constraints, and supporting context remain outside the DNF."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "EXT001-C062", "dnf": [["EXT001-U062-O1"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"obligation_id": "EXT001-U062-O1", "predicate": "A communication event is interpreted as though literal wording, performative force, and downstream effect were the same thing."}], "predicate": "A communication event is interpreted as though literal wording, performative force, and downstream effect were the same thing.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A communication event is interpreted as though literal wording, performative force, and downstream effect were the same thing.", "unit_id": "EXT001-U062"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"catalog_exhaustion": "CONDITION_LEVEL", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: A communication event is interpreted as though literal wording, performative force, and downstream effect were the same thing.", "slug": "pragmatics"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: A communication event is interpreted as though literal wording, performative force, and downstream effect were the same thing.", "slug": "performativity"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: A communication event is interpreted as though literal wording, performative force, and downstream effect were the same thing.", "slug": "ritual"}], "residual_id": "EXT001:locution_illocution_perlocution_decomposition:C01", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding."}}, "condition_id": "ext001_locution_illocution_perlocution_decomposition_a01", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored structural_problem, prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: A communication event is interpreted as though literal wording, performative force, and downstream effect were the same thing.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A communication event is interpreted as though literal wording, performative force, and downstream effect were the same thing."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: A communication event is interpreted as though literal wording, performative force, and downstream effect were the same thing.", "slug": "pragmatics"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: A communication event is interpreted as though literal wording, performative force, and downstream effect were the same thing.", "slug": "performativity"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: A communication event is interpreted as though literal wording, performative force, and downstream effect were the same thing.", "slug": "ritual"}], "normalized_requirement": "A communication event is interpreted as though literal wording, performative force, and downstream effect were the same thing.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A communication event is interpreted as though literal wording, performative force, and downstream effect were the same thing.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "EXT001-C063", "dnf": [["EXT001-U063-O1"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"obligation_id": "EXT001-U063-O1", "predicate": "The utterance's literal content, performed action, or effect can diverge in the case at issue."}], "predicate": "The utterance's literal content, performed action, or effect can diverge in the case at issue.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "The utterance's literal content, performed action, or effect can diverge in the case at issue.", "unit_id": "EXT001-U063"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"catalog_exhaustion": "CONDITION_LEVEL", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The utterance's literal content, performed action, or effect can diverge in the case at issue.", "slug": "performativity"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The utterance's literal content, performed action, or effect can diverge in the case at issue.", "slug": "summary_substance_divergence"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The utterance's literal content, performed action, or effect can diverge in the case at issue.", "slug": "informal_fallacy"}], "residual_id": "EXT001:locution_illocution_perlocution_decomposition:C02", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding."}}, "condition_id": "ext001_locution_illocution_perlocution_decomposition_a02", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored structural_problem, prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: The utterance's literal content, performed action, or effect can diverge in the case at issue.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The utterance's literal content, performed action, or effect can diverge in the case at issue."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The utterance's literal content, performed action, or effect can diverge in the case at issue.", "slug": "performativity"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The utterance's literal content, performed action, or effect can diverge in the case at issue.", "slug": "summary_substance_divergence"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The utterance's literal content, performed action, or effect can diverge in the case at issue.", "slug": "informal_fallacy"}], "normalized_requirement": "The utterance's literal content, performed action, or effect can diverge in the case at issue.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The utterance's literal content, performed action, or effect can diverge in the case at issue.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"candidate_ledger_sha256": "96f72d2139077fd57bf795048ebef33b3fd574b20963170080ec916b5b3b92fe", "extension_id": "new-archetypes-extension-001", "ledger_id": "prime-production-v1.2-extension-001", "ledger_sha256": "9644520614744632d1d36da44b1acd77ce432852c6083eb871203521c166efce"}, "base_projection_sha256": "841e0c7f3cb8e8054475ad29a8a14745a416b4fc115559a44878b94292e673ec", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "ca09ed9fe1598ce7072755b530de5553f5ee0a7cd64ae82d9e4a4e2149a37788", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Longitudinal Follow-Up Validation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:longitudinal_follow_up_validation", "slug": "longitudinal_follow_up_validation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 2, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system is treated as validated at launch, certification, approval, or pilot completion even though important evidence about durability, sustained effect, delayed harm, degradation, or drift can only appear after extended use.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system is treated as validated at launch, certification, approval, or pilot completion even though important evidence about durability, sustained effect, delayed harm, degradation, or drift can only appear after extended use."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The first condition leaves a residual state whose decay outlasts the assumed gap and contaminates later measurement.", "role_mapping": "Intervention -> first condition; aftereffect -> residual state; initial window -> assumed washout interval.", "slug": "washout_failure", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b039_a05_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The intervention has an expected lifespan, exposure period, treatment course, maintenance cycle, or behavioral aftereffect longer than the initial test window. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The intervention has an expected lifespan, exposure period, treatment course, maintenance cycle, or behavioral aftereffect longer than the initial test window."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Washout Failure", "one_liner": "When the same unit is observed under successive conditions, residual state from the first contaminates the second unless a gap long enough to dissipate it is built in, so underestimating that dissipation time reads the decaying tail of the old condition as an effect of the new one.", "page_ref": "prime:washout_failure", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Intervention -> first condition; aftereffect -> residual state; initial window -> assumed washout interval.", "slug": "washout_failure", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The first condition leaves a residual state whose decay outlasts the assumed gap and contaminates later measurement."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "An intervention-induced state or effect can persist beyond the initial observation window.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P075-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a beneficial effect associated with the same deployed system or intervention.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A deployed system or intervention has a focal benefit.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the post-deployment period rather than predeployment uncertainty or launch-time measurement alone.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The possible change occurs after initial deployment.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve temporal decay of the benefit rather than stable benefit or a one-time lower baseline.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The magnitude or effectiveness of the benefit can decrease over time.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the stated possibility of decay without requiring every deployment to exhibit it.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Benefit decay is possible rather than asserted as universal or already actual.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "Benefits can decay after initial deployment.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A benefit can diminish over time after initial deployment.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P075-C09-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P075-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an initially beneficial effect associated with the same deployed system or intervention.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A deployed system or intervention has a focal benefit.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a later post-deployment regime in which the effect can differ from its initial direction.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The possible reversal occurs after initial deployment.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a possible sign or direction reversal, not merely weakening while the effect remains beneficial.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The effect can change from beneficial to its opposite direction.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the stated possibility of reversal without requiring every deployment to exhibit it.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Benefit reversal is possible rather than asserted as universal or already actual.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "Benefits can reverse after initial deployment.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A benefit can reverse direction after initial deployment.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P075-C09-U2"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P075-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a beneficial effect associated with the same deployed system or intervention.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A deployed system or intervention has a focal benefit.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve at least two populations across which the benefit can be compared.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Multiple populations receive or are exposed to the focal effect.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve possible cross-population inequality in magnitude, availability, or persistence of the benefit.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The benefit can be uneven across those populations.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the post-deployment regime rather than only a predeployment population difference.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The possible unevenness appears after initial deployment.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the stated possibility of heterogeneous benefit without requiring every deployment to exhibit it.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Cross-population unevenness is possible rather than asserted as universal.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "Benefits can become uneven across populations after initial deployment.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A benefit can differ across populations after initial deployment.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P075-C09-U3"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Washout failure concerns persistent carryover into a successor measurement, not benefit decay, reversal, or population heterogeneity.", "slug": "washout_failure"}], "residual_id": "r:longitudinal_follow_up_validation:b039_a05_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b039_a05_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Benefits may decay, reverse, or become uneven across populations after initial deployment. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Benefits may decay, reverse, or become uneven across populations after initial deployment."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Counterexample attempt: preserve a complete gold_standard_erosion instance under this mapping and the qualifier 'The evaluated system was deployed before the reference label began to drift.' while falsifying 'A benefit can diminish over time after initial deployment.'. The attempt fails because the cited evidence plus the one guard fills O1, O2 entails every obligation in branch O1, O2, O3, O4. Without the qualifier a complete gold_standard_erosion instance can fall outside this unit; with the one named qualifier, no complete DNF branch remains falsifiable.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Gold-Standard Erosion", "one_liner": "Recognize that a model scored against a mutable reference label can show stable metrics while its real validity silently degrades, because the answer key — not the model — has drifted away from the construct it once operationalized.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:gold_standard_erosion", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1", "O2"], "guard_type": "TIMING_BINDING", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "system_deployed_before_reference_drift", "predicate": "The evaluated system was deployed before the reference label began to drift.", "rationale": "The SSD substitution preserves principal-role subtypes, relation direction, polarity/modality, and a complete DNF branch. The single qualifier 'The evaluated system was deployed before the reference label began to drift.' is anchored in The exact record contains an evaluated system, a mutable reference label, and validity degradation as that label drifts over time. and fills only O1, O2; it adds no second role or unrelated relation. The post-qualifier counterexample fails, so universal necessity survives the publication-safety audit."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "gold_standard_erosion"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The evaluated system was deployed before the reference label began to drift."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "gold_standard_erosion", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P075-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "SSD passes: The evaluated predictor maps to the deployed system, real-world validity to its benefit, and reference drift to the benefit's silent temporal degradation. The candidate directly supplies real-validity decay over time; one timing fact places the evaluated system in deployment before drift begins. The exact record and any emitted qualifier satisfy one complete DNF branch (O1, O2, O3, O4) without combining evidence across branches. The single qualifier 'The evaluated system was deployed before the reference label began to drift.' is anchored in The exact record contains an evaluated system, a mutable reference label, and validity degradation as that label drifts over time. and fills only O1, O2; it adds no second role or unrelated relation."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Counterexample attempt: preserve a complete hazard_control_decay instance under this mapping while falsifying 'A benefit can diminish over time after initial deployment.'. The attempt fails because the cited evidence directly entails every obligation in branch O1, O2, O3, O4. I attempted to preserve a complete hazard_control_decay instance while falsifying every DNF branch, but the exact structural commitments rule that counterexample out.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Hazard-Control Decay", "one_liner": "Track the widening gap between what a safety control's paperwork says it does and what it actually does under hazard, so that a control certified sound by audit can be found silently unprotective before it fails.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:hazard_control_decay", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "hazard_control_decay"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "hazard_control_decay", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P075-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "SSD passes: The implemented protective control maps to the deployed intervention, its protective effect to the benefit, and accumulated adaptive decay after implementation to decreasing effectiveness over time. The exact record directly defines post-implementation erosion of a protective benefit. The exact record and any emitted qualifier satisfy one complete DNF branch (O1, O2, O3, O4) without combining evidence across branches. No qualifier is used, so qualifier laundering and bridge generality are not applicable."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Counterexample attempt: preserve a complete lehmans_law_of_declining_quality instance under this mapping while falsifying 'A benefit can diminish over time after initial deployment.'. The attempt fails because the cited evidence directly entails every obligation in branch O1, O2, O3, O4. I attempted to preserve a complete lehmans_law_of_declining_quality instance while falsifying every DNF branch, but the exact structural commitments rule that counterexample out.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Lehman's law of declining quality", "one_liner": "Read software quality as the system's fit to its present environment rather than its intrinsic defect count, so an unchanged, bug-free release still degrades in the field as the surrounding world drifts away from the conditions it was built for.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:lehmans_law_of_declining_quality", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "lehmans_law_of_declining_quality"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "lehmans_law_of_declining_quality", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P075-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "SSD passes: The fielded E-type software maps to the deployed system, environmental fit to its benefit, and worsening fit over its lifetime to benefit decay. The exact record directly states that an unchanged deployed system can become less satisfactory as its environment changes. The exact record and any emitted qualifier satisfy one complete DNF branch (O1, O2, O3, O4) without combining evidence across branches. No qualifier is used, so qualifier laundering and bridge generality are not applicable."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Counterexample attempt: preserve a complete contraindication instance under this mapping and the qualifier 'The contraindicating condition arises after the treatment's initial deployment.' while falsifying 'A benefit can reverse direction after initial deployment.'. The attempt fails because the cited evidence plus the one guard fills O2 entails every obligation in branch O1, O2, O3, O4. Without the qualifier a complete contraindication instance can fall outside this unit; with the one named qualifier, no complete DNF branch remains falsifiable.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Contraindication", "one_liner": "Flag the sparse patient conditions under which a normally-indicated treatment becomes inadvisable, by naming the specific context in which its risk-benefit balance flips sign.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:contraindication", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2"], "guard_type": "TIMING_BINDING", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "contraindication_arises_after_deployment", "predicate": "The contraindicating condition arises after the treatment's initial deployment.", "rationale": "The SSD substitution preserves principal-role subtypes, relation direction, polarity/modality, and a complete DNF branch. The single qualifier 'The contraindicating condition arises after the treatment's initial deployment.' is anchored in The exact record contains a generally beneficial treatment, a conditioning context, and a sign-inverting risk-benefit relation. and fills only O2; it adds no second role or unrelated relation. The post-qualifier counterexample fails, so universal necessity survives the publication-safety audit."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "contraindication"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The contraindicating condition arises after the treatment's initial deployment."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "contraindication", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P075-C09-U2", "why_it_fits": "SSD passes: The normally indicated treatment maps to the deployed intervention and its expected benefit, while the condition-triggered risk-benefit inversion maps to reversal of that benefit. Contraindication directly supplies a benefit that flips sign; one timing qualifier places the conditioning change after initial deployment. The exact record and any emitted qualifier satisfy one complete DNF branch (O1, O2, O3, O4) without combining evidence across branches. The single qualifier 'The contraindicating condition arises after the treatment's initial deployment.' is anchored in The exact record contains a generally beneficial treatment, a conditioning context, and a sign-inverting risk-benefit relation. and fills only O2; it adds no second role or unrelated relation."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Counterexample attempt: preserve a complete contraindication instance under this mapping and the qualifier 'The treatment is deployed to both the default and contraindicated patient populations.' while falsifying 'A benefit can differ across populations after initial deployment.'. The attempt fails because the cited evidence plus the one guard fills O2, O4 entails every obligation in branch O1, O2, O3, O4, O5. Without the qualifier a complete contraindication instance can fall outside this unit; with the one named qualifier, no complete DNF branch remains falsifiable.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Contraindication", "one_liner": "Flag the sparse patient conditions under which a normally-indicated treatment becomes inadvisable, by naming the specific context in which its risk-benefit balance flips sign.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:contraindication", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2", "O4"], "guard_type": "MODALITY_ACTUALIZATION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "treatment_deployed_across_default_and_contraindicated_populations", "predicate": "The treatment is deployed to both the default and contraindicated patient populations.", "rationale": "The SSD substitution preserves principal-role subtypes, relation direction, polarity/modality, and a complete DNF branch. The single qualifier 'The treatment is deployed to both the default and contraindicated patient populations.' is anchored in The exact record already contains the default population, the contraindicated population, and their opposite risk-benefit relations. and fills only O2, O4; it adds no second role or unrelated relation. The post-qualifier counterexample fails, so universal necessity survives the publication-safety audit."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "contraindication"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The treatment is deployed to both the default and contraindicated patient populations."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "contraindication", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P075-C09-U3", "why_it_fits": "SSD passes: The normally indicated treatment maps to the focal intervention and benefit, while default and contraindicated patient groups map to populations with different benefit directions. The exact record supplies population-conditioned benefit heterogeneity; one deployment fact actualizes exposure across both populations. The exact record and any emitted qualifier satisfy one complete DNF branch (O1, O2, O3, O4, O5) without combining evidence across branches. The single qualifier 'The treatment is deployed to both the default and contraindicated patient populations.' is anchored in The exact record already contains the default population, the contraindicated population, and their opposite risk-benefit relations. and fills only O2, O4; it adds no second role or unrelated relation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Benefits can decay, reverse, or become uneven across populations after initial deployment.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P075-C10", "dnf": [], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [], "predicate": "Harms may be rare.", "resolution": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RESIDUAL", "semantic_scope": "NON_ABSTRACTION", "structural_head": "Harms may occur rarely.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P075-C10-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P075-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a common harm-producing source or process across successive contributions.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A focal system, exposure, or activity contributes harm over time.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve repeated or sustained contribution rather than one isolated harmful event.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Multiple or continuing contributions to harm occur.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve carry-forward or aggregation of harm over time, not independent events with no cumulative effect.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The contributions can accumulate into greater total harm.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the stated possibility of accumulation without requiring every instance to accumulate.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Cumulative harm is possible rather than asserted as universal.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "Harms may be cumulative.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Harm can accumulate across repeated or continuing contributions.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P075-C10-U2"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P075-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an initiating cause or exposure tied to the same focal harm.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A focal event, exposure, or system condition can cause harm.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a harmful consequence whose occurrence can be temporally compared with the initiating cause.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The harm has a manifestation distinct from its initiating cause.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a non-immediate harmful manifestation rather than a consequence occurring simultaneously with its cause.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The harm can manifest after a delay from the cause or exposure.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the stated possibility of delay without requiring every harm to be delayed.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Delayed manifestation is possible rather than asserted as universal.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "Harms may be delayed.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Harm can manifest after a delay from its cause or initiating exposure.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P075-C10-U3"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P075-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the same harm across its concealed and observable states.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A focal harmful condition or consequence exists as a possible system outcome.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve absence of initial observability or manifestation, not simply an observed harm with uncertain severity.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The harm can initially remain unmanifest or undetected.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve later manifestation or detection following the latent period.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The latent harm can become observable only later or under a revealing condition.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the stated possibility of latency without requiring every harm to be latent.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Harm latency is possible rather than asserted as universal.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "Harms may be latent.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Harm can remain unmanifest or undetected before becoming observable.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P075-C10-U4"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P075-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a system and an external environment participating in the same interaction.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A focal system interacts with an environment.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve prolonged interaction rather than a single immediate contact.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The system-environment interaction extends over the long run.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the prolonged interaction as a condition or cause of harm, not as unrelated background context.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The harm can be conditional on that long-run interaction.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the stated possibility of dependence without requiring every interaction to produce harm.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Interaction-dependent harm is possible rather than asserted as universal.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "Harms may depend on long-run interaction with the environment.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Harm can depend on a system's long-run interaction with its environment.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P075-C10-U5"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An empirical no-failure anchor concerns inference from observed nonfailure and does not require delayed or cumulative harm.", "slug": "empirical_no_failure_anchor"}], "residual_id": "r:longitudinal_follow_up_validation:b039_a05_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b039_a05_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Harms may be rare, cumulative, delayed, latent, or dependent on long-run interaction with the environment. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Harms may be rare, cumulative, delayed, latent, or dependent on long-run interaction with the environment."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_GUARDED_EQUIVALENT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Counterexample attempt: preserve a complete cumulative_dose instance under this mapping and the qualifier 'The cumulative-dose response is harmful rather than therapeutic.' while falsifying 'Harm can accumulate across repeated or continuing contributions.'. The attempt fails because the cited evidence plus the one guard fills O1, O3, O4 entails every obligation in branch O1, O2, O3, O4. Without the qualifier a complete cumulative_dose instance can fall outside this unit; with the one named qualifier, no complete DNF branch remains falsifiable.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Cumulative Dose", "one_liner": "Locate biological harm or benefit in the time-integral of an exposure stream rather than any single event, so a course of individually safe doses can still cross a threshold on the running stock — which reducing the present rate cannot undo.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:cumulative_dose", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1", "O3", "O4"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "cumulative_dose_response_is_harmful", "predicate": "The cumulative-dose response is harmful rather than therapeutic.", "rationale": "The SSD substitution preserves principal-role subtypes, relation direction, polarity/modality, and a complete DNF branch. The single qualifier 'The cumulative-dose response is harmful rather than therapeutic.' is anchored in The exact record explicitly defines cumulative dose over the disjunction of adverse and therapeutic outcomes. and fills only O1, O3, O4; it adds no second role or unrelated relation. The post-qualifier counterexample fails, so universal necessity survives the publication-safety audit."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "cumulative_dose"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The cumulative-dose response is harmful rather than therapeutic."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "cumulative_dose", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P075-C10-U2", "why_it_fits": "SSD passes: The exposure stream maps to repeated contributions, its running stock to accumulation, and the guarded adverse-response branch to increasing total harm. The DSA supplies time-integrated accumulation; one named polarity branch restricts the response to harm rather than benefit. The exact record and any emitted qualifier satisfy one complete DNF branch (O1, O2, O3, O4) without combining evidence across branches. The single qualifier 'The cumulative-dose response is harmful rather than therapeutic.' is anchored in The exact record explicitly defines cumulative dose over the disjunction of adverse and therapeutic outcomes. and fills only O1, O3, O4; it adds no second role or unrelated relation."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Counterexample attempt: preserve a complete latent_condition instance under this mapping while falsifying 'Harm can manifest after a delay from its cause or initiating exposure.'. The attempt fails because the cited evidence directly entails every obligation in branch O1, O2, O3, O4. I attempted to preserve a complete latent_condition instance while falsifying every DNF branch, but the exact structural commitments rule that counterexample out.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Latent Condition", "one_liner": "Name the dormant, pre-staged weakness in a system's defence layers — laid down by upstream decisions far from the sharp end — that produces no harm until an operational circumstance aligns it with an active failure to complete a path to an accident.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:latent_condition", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "latent_condition"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "latent_condition", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P075-C10-U3", "why_it_fits": "SSD passes: The upstream resident weakness maps to the causal condition, the later accident to the distinct harm manifestation, and months or years of dormancy to delayed expression. The exact record directly defines temporal separation between a causal condition and later harm. The exact record and any emitted qualifier satisfy one complete DNF branch (O1, O2, O3, O4) without combining evidence across branches. No qualifier is used, so qualifier laundering and bridge generality are not applicable."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Counterexample attempt: preserve a complete cumulative_dose instance under this mapping and the qualifier 'The cumulative-dose response is harmful rather than therapeutic.' while falsifying 'Harm can manifest after a delay from its cause or initiating exposure.'. The attempt fails because the cited evidence plus the one guard fills O1, O2, O4 entails every obligation in branch O1, O2, O3, O4. Without the qualifier a complete cumulative_dose instance can fall outside this unit; with the one named qualifier, no complete DNF branch remains falsifiable.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Cumulative Dose", "one_liner": "Locate biological harm or benefit in the time-integral of an exposure stream rather than any single event, so a course of individually safe doses can still cross a threshold on the running stock — which reducing the present rate cannot undo.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:cumulative_dose", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1", "O2", "O4"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "cumulative_dose_response_is_harmful", "predicate": "The cumulative-dose response is harmful rather than therapeutic.", "rationale": "The SSD substitution preserves principal-role subtypes, relation direction, polarity/modality, and a complete DNF branch. The single qualifier 'The cumulative-dose response is harmful rather than therapeutic.' is anchored in The exact record contains a time-integrated exposure stock and an adverse-or-therapeutic response function on that stock. and fills only O1, O2, O4; it adds no second role or unrelated relation. The post-qualifier counterexample fails, so universal necessity survives the publication-safety audit."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "cumulative_dose"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The cumulative-dose response is harmful rather than therapeutic."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "cumulative_dose", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P075-C10-U3", "why_it_fits": "SSD passes: The exposure flow maps to the initiating cause, the threshold response to the later manifestation, and the guarded adverse branch to harm. Time integration directly supplies the delay between initiating exposures and threshold manifestation; one polarity branch selects harm. The exact record and any emitted qualifier satisfy one complete DNF branch (O1, O2, O3, O4) without combining evidence across branches. The single qualifier 'The cumulative-dose response is harmful rather than therapeutic.' is anchored in The exact record contains a time-integrated exposure stock and an adverse-or-therapeutic response function on that stock. and fills only O1, O2, O4; it adds no second role or unrelated relation."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Counterexample attempt: preserve a complete organizational_influence_failure instance under this mapping while falsifying 'Harm can manifest after a delay from its cause or initiating exposure.'. The attempt fails because the cited evidence directly entails every obligation in branch O1, O2, O3, O4. I attempted to preserve a complete organizational_influence_failure instance while falsifying every DNF branch, but the exact structural commitments rule that counterexample out.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Organizational Influence Failure", "one_liner": "The accident-causation configuration in which upper-level resource, culture, and process decisions systematically stage the downstream conditions under which frontline operators produce unsafe acts — the apex of the HFACS four-level hierarchy, reclassifying the visible failure as the expression of an upstream choice rather than its cause.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:organizational_influence_failure", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "organizational_influence_failure"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "organizational_influence_failure", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P075-C10-U3", "why_it_fits": "SSD passes: The upper-level resource, culture, or process decision maps to the initiating condition and the eventual unsafe-act or accident expression to delayed downstream harm. The exact record directly supplies temporally remote upstream conditions whose harmful expression occurs later at the frontline. The exact record and any emitted qualifier satisfy one complete DNF branch (O1, O2, O3, O4) without combining evidence across branches. No qualifier is used, so qualifier laundering and bridge generality are not applicable."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Counterexample attempt: preserve a complete carryover_effect instance under this mapping while falsifying 'Harm can manifest after a delay from its cause or initiating exposure.'. The attempt fails because the cited evidence directly entails every obligation in branch O1, O2, O3, O4. I attempted to preserve a complete carryover_effect instance while falsifying every DNF branch, but the exact structural commitments rule that counterexample out.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Carryover Effect", "one_liner": "The validity threat in crossover and within-subject designs where residual influence from an earlier treatment persists into a later measurement window, biasing the contrast — its magnitude set by the unit's relaxation time against the inter-treatment gap.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:carryover_effect", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "carryover_effect"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "carryover_effect", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P075-C10-U3", "why_it_fits": "SSD passes: The earlier treatment maps to the initiating exposure, later-window bias to the distinct harmful manifestation, and residual influence across the inter-treatment gap to delay. The exact record directly defines a validity harm manifested in a later measurement window because of an earlier treatment. The exact record and any emitted qualifier satisfy one complete DNF branch (O1, O2, O3, O4) without combining evidence across branches. No qualifier is used, so qualifier laundering and bridge generality are not applicable."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_GUARDED_EQUIVALENT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Counterexample attempt: preserve a complete adverse_drug_reaction instance under this mapping and the qualifier 'The adverse drug reaction is the exact record's Type D delayed branch.' while falsifying 'Harm can manifest after a delay from its cause or initiating exposure.'. The attempt fails because the cited evidence plus the one guard fills O3 entails every obligation in branch O1, O2, O3, O4. Without the qualifier a complete adverse_drug_reaction instance can fall outside this unit; with the one named qualifier, no complete DNF branch remains falsifiable.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Adverse Drug Reaction", "one_liner": "Classify an unintended, harmful response arising under correct drug use — not through any administration error — by an ABCDEF taxonomy whose pivotal dose-related-versus-idiosyncratic split reads off predictability, remedy, and whether trials could ever have caught it.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:adverse_drug_reaction", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O3"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "adverse_drug_reaction_is_type_d", "predicate": "The adverse drug reaction is the exact record's Type D delayed branch.", "rationale": "The SSD substitution preserves principal-role subtypes, relation direction, polarity/modality, and a complete DNF branch. The single qualifier 'The adverse drug reaction is the exact record's Type D delayed branch.' is anchored in Type D is explicitly named in the exact record as appearing after a lag with respect to exposure. and fills only O3; it adds no second role or unrelated relation. The post-qualifier counterexample fails, so universal necessity survives the publication-safety audit."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "adverse_drug_reaction"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The adverse drug reaction is the exact record's Type D delayed branch."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "adverse_drug_reaction", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P075-C10-U3", "why_it_fits": "SSD passes: Correct drug exposure maps to the cause, the harmful response to the distinct manifestation, and the guarded Type D branch to delayed onset. The ADR record supplies cause and harmful response; selecting its named Type D branch makes delayed manifestation necessary. The exact record and any emitted qualifier satisfy one complete DNF branch (O1, O2, O3, O4) without combining evidence across branches. The single qualifier 'The adverse drug reaction is the exact record's Type D delayed branch.' is anchored in Type D is explicitly named in the exact record as appearing after a lag with respect to exposure. and fills only O3; it adds no second role or unrelated relation."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Counterexample attempt: preserve a complete latent_condition instance under this mapping while falsifying 'Harm can remain unmanifest or undetected before becoming observable.'. The attempt fails because the cited evidence directly entails every obligation in branch O1, O2, O3, O4. I attempted to preserve a complete latent_condition instance while falsifying every DNF branch, but the exact structural commitments rule that counterexample out.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Latent Condition", "one_liner": "Name the dormant, pre-staged weakness in a system's defence layers — laid down by upstream decisions far from the sharp end — that produces no harm until an operational circumstance aligns it with an active failure to complete a path to an accident.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:latent_condition", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "latent_condition"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "latent_condition", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P075-C10-U4", "why_it_fits": "SSD passes: The dormant resident weakness maps to the harmful condition, its months or years without expression to latency, and the activating circumstance to later observability through harm. The exact record directly defines a harmful condition that remains dormant until a revealing activation. The exact record and any emitted qualifier satisfy one complete DNF branch (O1, O2, O3, O4) without combining evidence across branches. No qualifier is used, so qualifier laundering and bridge generality are not applicable."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Counterexample attempt: preserve a complete latent_path_activation instance under this mapping while falsifying 'Harm can remain unmanifest or undetected before becoming observable.'. The attempt fails because the cited evidence directly entails every obligation in branch O1, O2, O3, O4. I attempted to preserve a complete latent_path_activation instance while falsifying every DNF branch, but the exact structural commitments rule that counterexample out.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Latent-Path Activation", "one_liner": "Explain harm that arrives while every factor is individually in-range as a previously inert causal path going live only when a rare conjunction of gating states closes every edge along it at once.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:latent_path_activation", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "latent_path_activation"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "latent_path_activation", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P075-C10-U4", "why_it_fits": "SSD passes: The inert causal path maps to the latent harmful condition, its blocked edges to initial nonmanifestation, and the rare gating conjunction to later observable harm. The exact record directly supplies conditional latency followed by manifestation under a revealing state conjunction. The exact record and any emitted qualifier satisfy one complete DNF branch (O1, O2, O3, O4) without combining evidence across branches. No qualifier is used, so qualifier laundering and bridge generality are not applicable."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Counterexample attempt: preserve a complete cumulative_dose instance under this mapping and the qualifier 'The cumulative-dose response is harmful rather than therapeutic.' while falsifying 'Harm can remain unmanifest or undetected before becoming observable.'. The attempt fails because the cited evidence plus the one guard fills O1, O3, O4 entails every obligation in branch O1, O2, O3, O4. Without the qualifier a complete cumulative_dose instance can fall outside this unit; with the one named qualifier, no complete DNF branch remains falsifiable.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Cumulative Dose", "one_liner": "Locate biological harm or benefit in the time-integral of an exposure stream rather than any single event, so a course of individually safe doses can still cross a threshold on the running stock — which reducing the present rate cannot undo.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:cumulative_dose", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1", "O3", "O4"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "cumulative_dose_response_is_harmful", "predicate": "The cumulative-dose response is harmful rather than therapeutic.", "rationale": "The SSD substitution preserves principal-role subtypes, relation direction, polarity/modality, and a complete DNF branch. The single qualifier 'The cumulative-dose response is harmful rather than therapeutic.' is anchored in The exact record contains individually sub-threshold exposures, a running stock, and a response threshold over harmful or beneficial outcomes. and fills only O1, O3, O4; it adds no second role or unrelated relation. The post-qualifier counterexample fails, so universal necessity survives the publication-safety audit."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "cumulative_dose"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The cumulative-dose response is harmful rather than therapeutic."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "cumulative_dose", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P075-C10-U4", "why_it_fits": "SSD passes: The sub-threshold running stock maps to the initially unmanifest condition, threshold crossing to later observability, and the guarded response polarity to harm. The DSA directly supplies sub-threshold latency and later threshold expression; one branch selection restricts that response to harm. The exact record and any emitted qualifier satisfy one complete DNF branch (O1, O2, O3, O4) without combining evidence across branches. The single qualifier 'The cumulative-dose response is harmful rather than therapeutic.' is anchored in The exact record contains individually sub-threshold exposures, a running stock, and a response threshold over harmful or beneficial outcomes. and fills only O1, O3, O4; it adds no second role or unrelated relation."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Counterexample attempt: preserve a complete gold_standard_erosion instance under this mapping while falsifying 'Harm can remain unmanifest or undetected before becoming observable.'. The attempt fails because the cited evidence directly entails every obligation in branch O1, O2, O3, O4. I attempted to preserve a complete gold_standard_erosion instance while falsifying every DNF branch, but the exact structural commitments rule that counterexample out.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Gold-Standard Erosion", "one_liner": "Recognize that a model scored against a mutable reference label can show stable metrics while its real validity silently degrades, because the answer key — not the model — has drifted away from the construct it once operationalized.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:gold_standard_erosion", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "gold_standard_erosion"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "gold_standard_erosion", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P075-C10-U4", "why_it_fits": "SSD passes: The silently degraded validity maps to the harmful condition, stable metrics to initial nondetection, and later construct-sensitive reevaluation to observability. The exact record directly supplies silent validity harm masked by dashboards and recoverable through later reference-sensitive evaluation. The exact record and any emitted qualifier satisfy one complete DNF branch (O1, O2, O3, O4) without combining evidence across branches. No qualifier is used, so qualifier laundering and bridge generality are not applicable."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Counterexample attempt: preserve a complete hazard_control_decay instance under this mapping while falsifying 'Harm can remain unmanifest or undetected before becoming observable.'. The attempt fails because the cited evidence directly entails every obligation in branch O1, O2, O3, O4. I attempted to preserve a complete hazard_control_decay instance while falsifying every DNF branch, but the exact structural commitments rule that counterexample out.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Hazard-Control Decay", "one_liner": "Track the widening gap between what a safety control's paperwork says it does and what it actually does under hazard, so that a control certified sound by audit can be found silently unprotective before it fails.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:hazard_control_decay", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "hazard_control_decay"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "hazard_control_decay", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P075-C10-U4", "why_it_fits": "SSD passes: The silently ineffective control maps to the latent harmful condition, nominal audit success to nondetection, and functional testing or hazard encounter to later revelation. The exact record directly supplies silent loss of protection that becomes observable under enacted testing or hazard. The exact record and any emitted qualifier satisfy one complete DNF branch (O1, O2, O3, O4) without combining evidence across branches. No qualifier is used, so qualifier laundering and bridge generality are not applicable."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Counterexample attempt: preserve a complete adverse_drug_reaction instance under this mapping and the qualifier 'The adverse drug reaction is the exact record's Type D delayed branch.' while falsifying 'Harm can remain unmanifest or undetected before becoming observable.'. The attempt fails because the cited evidence plus the one guard fills O2, O3 entails every obligation in branch O1, O2, O3, O4. Without the qualifier a complete adverse_drug_reaction instance can fall outside this unit; with the one named qualifier, no complete DNF branch remains falsifiable.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Adverse Drug Reaction", "one_liner": "Classify an unintended, harmful response arising under correct drug use — not through any administration error — by an ABCDEF taxonomy whose pivotal dose-related-versus-idiosyncratic split reads off predictability, remedy, and whether trials could ever have caught it.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:adverse_drug_reaction", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2", "O3"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "adverse_drug_reaction_is_type_d", "predicate": "The adverse drug reaction is the exact record's Type D delayed branch.", "rationale": "The SSD substitution preserves principal-role subtypes, relation direction, polarity/modality, and a complete DNF branch. The single qualifier 'The adverse drug reaction is the exact record's Type D delayed branch.' is anchored in Type D is explicitly named in the exact record as appearing only after a lag from exposure. and fills only O2, O3; it adds no second role or unrelated relation. The post-qualifier counterexample fails, so universal necessity survives the publication-safety audit."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "adverse_drug_reaction"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The adverse drug reaction is the exact record's Type D delayed branch."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "adverse_drug_reaction", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P075-C10-U4", "why_it_fits": "SSD passes: The harmful drug response maps to the focal harm, and the guarded Type D branch maps to initial absence followed by delayed manifestation. The ADR record supplies the harmful outcome; selecting its named Type D branch supplies latency and later observability. The exact record and any emitted qualifier satisfy one complete DNF branch (O1, O2, O3, O4) without combining evidence across branches. The single qualifier 'The adverse drug reaction is the exact record's Type D delayed branch.' is anchored in Type D is explicitly named in the exact record as appearing only after a lag from exposure. and fills only O2, O3; it adds no second role or unrelated relation."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_GUARDED_EQUIVALENT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Counterexample attempt: preserve a complete cumulative_dose instance under this mapping and the qualifier 'The cumulative-dose response is harmful rather than therapeutic.' while falsifying 'Harm can depend on a system's long-run interaction with its environment.'. The attempt fails because the cited evidence plus the one guard fills O3, O4 entails every obligation in branch O1, O2, O3, O4. Without the qualifier a complete cumulative_dose instance can fall outside this unit; with the one named qualifier, no complete DNF branch remains falsifiable.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Cumulative Dose", "one_liner": "Locate biological harm or benefit in the time-integral of an exposure stream rather than any single event, so a course of individually safe doses can still cross a threshold on the running stock — which reducing the present rate cannot undo.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:cumulative_dose", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O3", "O4"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "cumulative_dose_response_is_harmful", "predicate": "The cumulative-dose response is harmful rather than therapeutic.", "rationale": "The SSD substitution preserves principal-role subtypes, relation direction, polarity/modality, and a complete DNF branch. The single qualifier 'The cumulative-dose response is harmful rather than therapeutic.' is anchored in The exact record contains a biological system, a time-integrated exposure stream, and an adverse-or-therapeutic response function. and fills only O3, O4; it adds no second role or unrelated relation. The post-qualifier counterexample fails, so universal necessity survives the publication-safety audit."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "cumulative_dose"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The cumulative-dose response is harmful rather than therapeutic."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "cumulative_dose", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P075-C10-U5", "why_it_fits": "SSD passes: The biological subject maps to the focal system, the time-integrated exposure stream to long-run environmental interaction, and the guarded adverse branch to conditional harm. The DSA supplies long-run system-exposure interaction; one polarity branch selects an adverse rather than therapeutic response. The exact record and any emitted qualifier satisfy one complete DNF branch (O1, O2, O3, O4) without combining evidence across branches. The single qualifier 'The cumulative-dose response is harmful rather than therapeutic.' is anchored in The exact record contains a biological system, a time-integrated exposure stream, and an adverse-or-therapeutic response function. and fills only O3, O4; it adds no second role or unrelated relation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Harms can be rare, cumulative, delayed, latent, or conditional on long-run environmental interaction.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A deployment distribution moves away from the reference distribution after a static mapping was calibrated.", "role_mapping": "Post-launch conditions -> deployment stream; shift -> distributional gap.", "slug": "data_drift", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The input-outcome relationship changes over time after a rule was calibrated and deployed.", "role_mapping": "Operating relation -> generating process; post-deployment shift -> temporal concept change.", "slug": "concept_drift", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b039_a05_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Users, infrastructure, patient populations, data distributions, adversaries, incentives, or operating conditions may shift after deployment. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Users, infrastructure, patient populations, data distributions, adversaries, incentives, or operating conditions may shift after deployment."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Data Drift", "one_liner": "A static learned mapping silently loses accuracy as the deployment distribution drifts away from the distribution it was calibrated on.", "page_ref": "prime:data_drift", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Post-launch conditions -> deployment stream; shift -> distributional gap.", "slug": "data_drift", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A deployment distribution moves away from the reference distribution after a static mapping was calibrated."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Concept Drift", "one_liner": "A learned rule silently loses validity when the input–outcome relationship it was calibrated on changes underneath it.", "page_ref": "prime:concept_drift", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Operating relation -> generating process; post-deployment shift -> temporal concept change.", "slug": "concept_drift", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The input-outcome relationship changes over time after a rule was calibrated and deployed."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The deployment population, data distribution, input-outcome relation, infrastructure, incentives, or operating context can shift after launch.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires evidence from a controlled, curated pilot niche whose support and selection differ from the scaled regime.", "role_mapping": "Initial validation -> pilot evidence; artificial or controlled conditions -> curated niche.", "slug": "pilot_to_scale_transition", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b039_a05_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Initial validation used limited sample size, short follow-up, artificial conditions, proxy metrics, or controlled pilots. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Initial validation used limited sample size, short follow-up, artificial conditions, proxy metrics, or controlled pilots."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Pilot To Scale Transition", "one_liner": "An effect proven in a curated niche need not survive the heterogeneous distribution of scale.", "page_ref": "prime:pilot_to_scale_transition", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Initial validation -> pilot evidence; artificial or controlled conditions -> curated niche.", "slug": "pilot_to_scale_transition", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires evidence from a controlled, curated pilot niche whose support and selection differ from the scaled regime."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The initial validity claim rests on a short, small, proxy-based, artificial, or controlled pilot regime.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The organization has authority to revise, recall, patch, reinforce, re-certify, or retire the system if long-run evidence changes the validity claim.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: The organization has authority to revise, recall, patch, reinforce, re-certify, or retire the system if long-run evidence changes the validity claim. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The organization has authority to revise, recall, patch, reinforce, re-certify, or retire the system if long-run evidence changes the validity claim."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The organization has authority to revise, recall, patch, reinforce, re-certify, or retire the system if long-run evidence changes the validity claim."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 39, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-039", "ledger_sha256": "d3193996ed4801fb57ab3256da8053c3558c43ae0e9d3f18c6c559a8aa42e06d"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Lossless Bijective Mapping Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:lossless_bijective_mapping_design", "slug": "lossless_bijective_mapping_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A mapping between two sets, schemas, namespaces, identifiers, states, encodings, allocations, or versions is treated as equivalent or reversible even though collisions, gaps, orphaned targets, missing sources, or broken inverse paths may exist. As a result, migrations lose information, records merge incorrectly, target states remain unreachable, allocations double-book resources, old identifiers cannot be recovered, or downstream users falsely trust a mapping that is only partial, many-to-one, or one-to-many.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A mapping between two sets, schemas, namespaces, identifiers, states, encodings, allocations, or versions is treated as equivalent or reversible even though collisions, gaps, orphaned targets, missing sources, or broken inverse paths may exist. As a result, migrations lose information, records merge incorrectly, target states remain unreachable, allocations double-book resources, old identifiers cannot be recovered, or downstream users falsely trust a mapping that is only partial, many-to-one, or one-to-many."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P075-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O9"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O10"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O11"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an operational source-to-target mapping of the selected listed form.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An operational mapping or transition connects source and target representations, collections, or states.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an assertion or promise of identity preservation, not require that preservation has been proved or achieved.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The mapping claims to preserve identity.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a claim of exact identity correspondence rather than approximate, partial, or best-effort matching.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The claimed identity preservation is exact.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve a migration as the mapping that claims exact identity preservation.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The operational mapping is a migration.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve a crosswalk as the mapping that claims exact identity preservation.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The operational mapping is a crosswalk.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve an encoding as the mapping that claims exact identity preservation.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The operational mapping is an encoding.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve an import as the mapping that claims exact identity preservation.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The operational mapping is an import.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve an export as the mapping that claims exact identity preservation.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The operational mapping is an export.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve synchronization as the mapping that claims exact identity preservation.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "The operational mapping is a synchronization.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve an allocation as the mapping that claims exact identity preservation.", "obligation_id": "O10", "statement": "The operational mapping is an allocation.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve a schema transition as the mapping that claims exact identity preservation.", "obligation_id": "O11", "statement": "The operational mapping is a schema transition.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "An operational mapping claims to preserve identity exactly.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "One listed operational mapping claims to preserve identity exactly.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P075-C11-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P075-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O9"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O10"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O11"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an operational source-to-target mapping of the selected listed form.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An operational mapping or transition connects source and target representations, collections, or states.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an assertion or promise of information preservation, not require that preservation has been proved or achieved.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The mapping claims to preserve information.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a claim of lossless information preservation rather than approximate, partial, or best-effort transfer.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The claimed information preservation is exact.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve a migration as the mapping that claims exact information preservation.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The operational mapping is a migration.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve a crosswalk as the mapping that claims exact information preservation.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The operational mapping is a crosswalk.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve an encoding as the mapping that claims exact information preservation.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The operational mapping is an encoding.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve an import as the mapping that claims exact information preservation.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The operational mapping is an import.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve an export as the mapping that claims exact information preservation.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The operational mapping is an export.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve synchronization as the mapping that claims exact information preservation.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "The operational mapping is a synchronization.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve an allocation as the mapping that claims exact information preservation.", "obligation_id": "O10", "statement": "The operational mapping is an allocation.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve a schema transition as the mapping that claims exact information preservation.", "obligation_id": "O11", "statement": "The operational mapping is a schema transition.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "An operational mapping claims to preserve information exactly.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "One listed operational mapping claims to preserve information exactly.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P075-C11-U2"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A mathematical bijection can exist without a migration, crosswalk, or operational preservation claim.", "slug": "bijectivity"}], "residual_id": "r:lossless_bijective_mapping_design:b039_a06_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b039_a06_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A migration, crosswalk, encoding, import, export, synchronization, allocation, or schema transition claims to preserve identity or information exactly. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A migration, crosswalk, encoding, import, export, synchronization, allocation, or schema transition claims to preserve identity or information exactly."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_GUARDED_EQUIVALENT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Counterexample attempt: preserve a complete schema_mapping_relation instance under this mapping and the qualifier 'The schema mapping's declared correspondence type is exactMatch.' while falsifying 'One listed operational mapping claims to preserve identity exactly.'. The attempt fails because the cited evidence plus the one guard fills O2, O3 entails every obligation in branch O1, O2, O3, O4. Without the qualifier a complete schema_mapping_relation instance can fall outside this unit; with the one named qualifier, no complete DNF branch remains falsifiable.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Schema Mapping Relation", "one_liner": "Bridge two independently governed classification schemes with an explicit, typed assertion — source concept, target concept, and a fidelity grade (exact / close / broader / narrower / related) — so consumers know exactly what the bridge guarantees without merging the schemes.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:schema_mapping_relation", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2", "O3"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "schema_mapping_correspondence_is_exactmatch", "predicate": "The schema mapping's declared correspondence type is exactMatch.", "rationale": "The SSD substitution preserves principal-role subtypes, relation direction, polarity/modality, and a complete DNF branch. The single qualifier 'The schema mapping's declared correspondence type is exactMatch.' is anchored in The exact record lists exactMatch as its loss-free substitution grade alongside weaker correspondence grades. and fills only O2, O3; it adds no second role or unrelated relation. The post-qualifier counterexample fails, so universal necessity survives the publication-safety audit."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "schema_mapping_relation"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The schema mapping's declared correspondence type is exactMatch."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "schema_mapping_relation", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P075-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "SSD passes: The cross-scheme correspondence maps to the operational crosswalk, while the guarded exactMatch grade maps to its exact identity-preservation claim. The DSA supplies a typed crosswalk; selecting its exactMatch grade supplies the exact identity claim. The exact record and any emitted qualifier satisfy one complete DNF branch (O1, O2, O3, O4) without combining evidence across branches. The single qualifier 'The schema mapping's declared correspondence type is exactMatch.' is anchored in The exact record lists exactMatch as its loss-free substitution grade alongside weaker correspondence grades. and fills only O2, O3; it adds no second role or unrelated relation."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Counterexample attempt: preserve a complete declared_equivalence_mapping instance under this mapping while falsifying 'One listed operational mapping claims to preserve identity exactly.'. The attempt fails because the cited evidence directly entails every obligation in branch O1, O2, O3, O4. I attempted to preserve a complete declared_equivalence_mapping instance while falsifying every DNF branch, but the exact structural commitments rule that counterexample out.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Declared Equivalence Mapping", "one_liner": "An explicit, authoritative, versioned assertion that two concepts from different vocabularies are interchangeable for stated purposes — collapsing a cross-scheme distinction to zero for consumers who trust the declaration rather than re-verifying at use-time.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:declared_equivalence_mapping", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "declared_equivalence_mapping"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "declared_equivalence_mapping", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P075-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "SSD passes: The authoritative cross-scheme assertion maps to the crosswalk, and its declared zero distinction and bidirectional interchangeability map to an exact identity-preservation claim. The exact record directly defines a crosswalk that claims two concepts interchangeable without loss for its stated purpose. The exact record and any emitted qualifier satisfy one complete DNF branch (O1, O2, O3, O4) without combining evidence across branches. No qualifier is used, so qualifier laundering and bridge generality are not applicable."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_GUARDED_EQUIVALENT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Counterexample attempt: preserve a complete schema_mapping_relation instance under this mapping and the qualifier 'The schema mapping's declared correspondence type is exactMatch.' while falsifying 'One listed operational mapping claims to preserve information exactly.'. The attempt fails because the cited evidence plus the one guard fills O2, O3 entails every obligation in branch O1, O2, O3, O4. Without the qualifier a complete schema_mapping_relation instance can fall outside this unit; with the one named qualifier, no complete DNF branch remains falsifiable.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Schema Mapping Relation", "one_liner": "Bridge two independently governed classification schemes with an explicit, typed assertion — source concept, target concept, and a fidelity grade (exact / close / broader / narrower / related) — so consumers know exactly what the bridge guarantees without merging the schemes.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:schema_mapping_relation", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2", "O3"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "schema_mapping_correspondence_is_exactmatch", "predicate": "The schema mapping's declared correspondence type is exactMatch.", "rationale": "The SSD substitution preserves principal-role subtypes, relation direction, polarity/modality, and a complete DNF branch. The single qualifier 'The schema mapping's declared correspondence type is exactMatch.' is anchored in The exact record lists exactMatch as the grade safe for substitution without loss. and fills only O2, O3; it adds no second role or unrelated relation. The post-qualifier counterexample fails, so universal necessity survives the publication-safety audit."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "schema_mapping_relation"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The schema mapping's declared correspondence type is exactMatch."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "schema_mapping_relation", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P075-C11-U2", "why_it_fits": "SSD passes: The cross-scheme correspondence maps to the operational crosswalk, while the guarded exactMatch grade maps to its exact information-preservation claim. The DSA supplies a typed crosswalk; selecting exactMatch supplies loss-free information preservation. The exact record and any emitted qualifier satisfy one complete DNF branch (O1, O2, O3, O4) without combining evidence across branches. The single qualifier 'The schema mapping's declared correspondence type is exactMatch.' is anchored in The exact record lists exactMatch as the grade safe for substitution without loss. and fills only O2, O3; it adds no second role or unrelated relation."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Counterexample attempt: preserve a complete declared_equivalence_mapping instance under this mapping while falsifying 'One listed operational mapping claims to preserve information exactly.'. The attempt fails because the cited evidence directly entails every obligation in branch O1, O2, O3, O4. I attempted to preserve a complete declared_equivalence_mapping instance while falsifying every DNF branch, but the exact structural commitments rule that counterexample out.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Declared Equivalence Mapping", "one_liner": "An explicit, authoritative, versioned assertion that two concepts from different vocabularies are interchangeable for stated purposes — collapsing a cross-scheme distinction to zero for consumers who trust the declaration rather than re-verifying at use-time.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:declared_equivalence_mapping", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "declared_equivalence_mapping"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "declared_equivalence_mapping", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P075-C11-U2", "why_it_fits": "SSD passes: The authoritative cross-scheme assertion maps to the crosswalk, and substitution without loss maps to exact information preservation. The exact record directly defines a crosswalk claiming loss-free interchangeability for its stated purpose. The exact record and any emitted qualifier satisfy one complete DNF branch (O1, O2, O3, O4) without combining evidence across branches. No qualifier is used, so qualifier laundering and bridge generality are not applicable."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A migration, crosswalk, encoding, allocation, or schema transition claims exact identity or information preservation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A bijection is a function and is injective: every source maps and distinct sources do not collide.", "role_mapping": "Source item -> domain element; target counterpart -> codomain image.", "slug": "bijectivity", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "An injective mapping assigns outputs while preserving distinct source identities without collision.", "role_mapping": "Source item -> input; target counterpart -> output; one-and-only-one -> function plus no-collision invariant.", "slug": "injectivity", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b039_a06_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Every source item is supposed to have one and only one target counterpart. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Every source item is supposed to have one and only one target counterpart."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Bijectivity", "one_liner": "A correspondence that is exactly one-to-one and onto — no collisions, no gaps — so it is reversible and the two collections have equal size and information content.", "page_ref": "prime:bijectivity", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source item -> domain element; target counterpart -> codomain image.", "slug": "bijectivity", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A bijection is a function and is injective: every source maps and distinct sources do not collide."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Injectivity", "one_liner": "A distinctness-preserving mapping in which distinct inputs never collide on one output.", "page_ref": "prime:injectivity", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source item -> input; target counterpart -> output; one-and-only-one -> function plus no-collision invariant.", "slug": "injectivity", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "An injective mapping assigns outputs while preserving distinct source identities without collision."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Every source member has exactly one target counterpart and distinct source identities remain distinguishable.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Surjectivity is mandatory within a bijection, so every target has a source.", "role_mapping": "Target item -> codomain element; accounted for -> has a preimage.", "slug": "bijectivity", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The no-gap invariant requires every codomain target to be hit by some source.", "role_mapping": "Target item -> codomain element; orphan -> element without preimage.", "slug": "surjectivity", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b039_a06_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Every target item is supposed to be accounted for by the mapping rather than appearing as an orphan, duplicate, or unused residue. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Every target item is supposed to be accounted for by the mapping rather than appearing as an orphan, duplicate, or unused residue."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Bijectivity", "one_liner": "A correspondence that is exactly one-to-one and onto — no collisions, no gaps — so it is reversible and the two collections have equal size and information content.", "page_ref": "prime:bijectivity", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Target item -> codomain element; accounted for -> has a preimage.", "slug": "bijectivity", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Surjectivity is mandatory within a bijection, so every target has a source."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Surjectivity", "one_liner": "A coverage-guaranteeing mapping in which every element of the target is hit by some input, leaving no gap in the codomain.", "page_ref": "prime:surjectivity", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Target item -> codomain element; orphan -> element without preimage.", "slug": "surjectivity", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The no-gap invariant requires every codomain target to be hit by some source."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Every governed target is reached by a source, leaving no orphaned or unused target.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "No collisions plus no gaps yields a unique inverse and reversible round trips.", "role_mapping": "Reverse lookup -> inverse; source and target -> domain and codomain.", "slug": "bijectivity", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "Injectivity guarantees a left inverse and recovery for every output in the mapping's image.", "role_mapping": "Produced target -> image element; backward lookup -> left inverse.", "slug": "injectivity", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b039_a06_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A reverse lookup, rollback, audit, reconstruction, or round-trip conversion must be possible. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A reverse lookup, rollback, audit, reconstruction, or round-trip conversion must be possible."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Bijectivity", "one_liner": "A correspondence that is exactly one-to-one and onto — no collisions, no gaps — so it is reversible and the two collections have equal size and information content.", "page_ref": "prime:bijectivity", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Reverse lookup -> inverse; source and target -> domain and codomain.", "slug": "bijectivity", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "No collisions plus no gaps yields a unique inverse and reversible round trips."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Injectivity", "one_liner": "A distinctness-preserving mapping in which distinct inputs never collide on one output.", "page_ref": "prime:injectivity", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Produced target -> image element; backward lookup -> left inverse.", "slug": "injectivity", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Injectivity guarantees a left inverse and recovery for every output in the mapping's image."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A produced target can be traced backward to its source, and a full round trip is well-defined when the map covers the governed target set.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P075-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O9"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve one mapping and the two collections serving as its source and target roles.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A focal mapping connects two collections.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve collection change after the mapping exists, not only a static one-time mapping.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The mapped collections are evolving over time.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a continuing exactness requirement rather than a claim that exactness actually survives every change.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The mapping is required to remain exact after change.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve change on at least one side of the mapping while the same mapping remains subject to exactness maintenance.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The selected change may occur in either mapped collection.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve addition to a mapped collection as the change after which exactness must remain.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The collection change is an addition.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve removal from a mapped collection as the change after which exactness must remain.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The collection change is a removal.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve splitting an item or category in a mapped collection as the change after which exactness must remain.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The collection change is a split.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve merging items or categories in a mapped collection as the change after which exactness must remain.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The collection change is a merge.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve renaming in a mapped collection as the change after which exactness must remain.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "The collection change is a rename.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "The exact mapping must remain valid while either collection undergoes additions, removals, splits, merges, or renames.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A mapping between evolving collections must remain exact after one listed change to either collection.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P075-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Bijectivity is a property of a mapping at a given scope and does not entail evolving collections or change maintenance.", "slug": "bijectivity"}], "residual_id": "r:lossless_bijective_mapping_design:b039_a06_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b039_a06_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The two collections are evolving and the mapping must remain exact after additions, removals, splits, merges, or renames. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The two collections are evolving and the mapping must remain exact after additions, removals, splits, merges, or renames."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Bijectivity is a property of a mapping at a given scope and does not entail evolving collections or change maintenance.", "slug": "bijectivity"}], "normalized_requirement": "The exact mapping must remain valid while either collection undergoes additions, removals, splits, merges, or renames.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The exact mapping must remain valid while either collection undergoes additions, removals, splits, merges, or renames.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Collisions or gaps would create serious errors in counts, rights, ownership, billing, safety, compliance, provenance, or interpretation.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A mapping between two sets, schemas, namespaces, identifiers, states, encodings, allocations, or versions is treated as equivalent or reversible even though collisions, gaps, orphaned targets, missing sources, or broken inverse paths may exist. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Collisions or gaps would create serious errors in counts, rights, ownership, billing, safety, compliance, provenance, or interpretation. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Collisions or gaps would create serious errors in counts, rights, ownership, billing, safety, compliance, provenance, or interpretation.", "A mapping between two sets, schemas, namespaces, identifiers, states, encodings, allocations, or versions is treated as equivalent or reversible even though collisions, gaps, orphaned targets, missing sources, or broken inverse paths may exist."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Collisions or gaps would create serious errors in counts, rights, ownership, billing, safety, compliance, provenance, or interpretation."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 39, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-039", "ledger_sha256": "d3193996ed4801fb57ab3256da8053c3558c43ae0e9d3f18c6c559a8aa42e06d"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Malleability Window Governance", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:malleability_window_governance", "slug": "malleability_window_governance"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system, technology, policy, infrastructure, platform, or institutional choice must be acted on before its consequences are fully known, yet every step toward deployment creates sunk investment, dependencies, expectations, standards, political commitments, network effects, or material infrastructure that make later correction harder. Early action is malleable but ignorant; late action is informed but locked in.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system, technology, policy, infrastructure, platform, or institutional choice must be acted on before its consequences are fully known, yet every step toward deployment creates sunk investment, dependencies, expectations, standards, political commitments, network effects, or material infrastructure that make later correction harder. Early action is malleable but ignorant; late action is informed but locked in."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Its rising information curve requires consequential knowledge that becomes available only through deployment and lived experience.", "role_mapping": "Focal system -> developing system; unknown consequences -> low early information.", "slug": "collingridge_dilemma", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b039_a07_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The focal system has important delayed, distributed, emergent, or second-order consequences that cannot be fully known before use. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The focal system has important delayed, distributed, emergent, or second-order consequences that cannot be fully known before use."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Collingridge Dilemma", "one_liner": "Information about a system's consequences rises as the cost of changing it rises, so the window where intervention is both informed and feasible may be narrow or absent.", "page_ref": "prime:collingridge_dilemma", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Focal system -> developing system; unknown consequences -> low early information.", "slug": "collingridge_dilemma", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Its rising information curve requires consequential knowledge that becomes available only through deployment and lived experience."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Important delayed, distributed, emergent, or second-order consequences cannot be fully known before the system is used.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The co-directional intervention-cost curve rises as scale, standards, infrastructure, and commitments lock in.", "role_mapping": "Deployment or adoption -> commitment accumulation; switching cost -> rising intervention-cost curve.", "slug": "collingridge_dilemma", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b039_a07_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Deployment, scaling, procurement, standardization, legal authorization, infrastructure buildout, or social adoption will raise switching costs over time. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Deployment, scaling, procurement, standardization, legal authorization, infrastructure buildout, or social adoption will raise switching costs over time."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Collingridge Dilemma", "one_liner": "Information about a system's consequences rises as the cost of changing it rises, so the window where intervention is both informed and feasible may be narrow or absent.", "page_ref": "prime:collingridge_dilemma", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Deployment or adoption -> commitment accumulation; switching cost -> rising intervention-cost curve.", "slug": "collingridge_dilemma", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The co-directional intervention-cost curve rises as scale, standards, infrastructure, and commitments lock in."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Deployment and adoption accumulate commitments that raise switching and intervention costs over time.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact pattern classifies commitments by restoration feasibility, time dependence, and option loss.", "role_mapping": "Learning commitment -> reversible action; path-setting commitment -> costly or irreversible action.", "slug": "reversibility_and_irreversibility", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b039_a07_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: There is a meaningful difference between reversible learning commitments and irreversible path-setting commitments. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["There is a meaningful difference between reversible learning commitments and irreversible path-setting commitments."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Reversibility and Irreversibility", "one_liner": "Actions or transitions may or may not be undone or reverted.", "page_ref": "prime:reversibility_and_irreversibility", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Learning commitment -> reversible action; path-setting commitment -> costly or irreversible action.", "slug": "reversibility_and_irreversibility", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact pattern classifies commitments by restoration feasibility, time dependence, and option loss."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Learning commitments and path-setting commitments differ materially in reversibility and restoration cost.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Its defining temporal race is that lock-in rises before deployment supplies enough consequence information.", "role_mapping": "Proceeding -> developing deployment; lock-in -> intervention-cost curve; legibility -> information curve.", "slug": "collingridge_dilemma", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b039_a07_c8", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Proceeding without explicit reversibility would create avoidable lock-in before consequences are legible. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Proceeding without explicit reversibility would create avoidable lock-in before consequences are legible."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Collingridge Dilemma", "one_liner": "Information about a system's consequences rises as the cost of changing it rises, so the window where intervention is both informed and feasible may be narrow or absent.", "page_ref": "prime:collingridge_dilemma", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Proceeding -> developing deployment; lock-in -> intervention-cost curve; legibility -> information curve.", "slug": "collingridge_dilemma", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Its defining temporal race is that lock-in rises before deployment supplies enough consequence information."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Proceeding without explicit reversibility creates lock-in before consequences become sufficiently legible.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [8], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Early evidence can be generated through bounded trials, simulations, pilots, red-team exercises, stakeholder reporting, staged release, or monitored limited use.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: Early evidence can be generated through bounded trials, simulations, pilots, red-team exercises, stakeholder reporting, staged release, or monitored limited use. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Early evidence can be generated through bounded trials, simulations, pilots, red-team exercises, stakeholder reporting, staged release, or monitored limited use."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Early evidence can be generated through bounded trials, simulations, pilots, red-team exercises, stakeholder reporting, staged release, or monitored limited use."}, {"display_text": "The organization or polity has enough authority to pause, reverse, redesign, compensate, or constrain the system if evidence warrants action.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: The organization or polity has enough authority to pause, reverse, redesign, compensate, or constrain the system if evidence warrants action. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The organization or polity has enough authority to pause, reverse, redesign, compensate, or constrain the system if evidence warrants action."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The organization or polity has enough authority to pause, reverse, redesign, compensate, or constrain the system if evidence warrants action."}, {"display_text": "Affected stakeholders may observe consequences that designers, operators, vendors, or regulators will miss.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Affected stakeholders may observe consequences that designers, operators, vendors, or regulators will miss. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Affected stakeholders may observe consequences that designers, operators, vendors, or regulators will miss."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Affected stakeholders may observe consequences that designers, operators, vendors, or regulators will miss."}, {"display_text": "Waiting for perfect knowledge would itself create harm, lost opportunity, or unmanaged diffusion.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Waiting for perfect knowledge would itself create harm, lost opportunity, or unmanaged diffusion. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Waiting for perfect knowledge would itself create harm, lost opportunity, or unmanaged diffusion."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "Waiting for perfect knowledge would itself create harm, lost opportunity, or unmanaged diffusion."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 39, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-039", "ledger_sha256": "d3193996ed4801fb57ab3256da8053c3558c43ae0e9d3f18c6c559a8aa42e06d"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Managed Retreat", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:managed_retreat", "slug": "managed_retreat"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A subject that cannot move quickly enough is losing viable space between a directional pressure front and a rear boundary treated as fixed. Ordinary adaptation inside the shrinking zone buys time but can increase sunk costs and reduce future mobility. Movement requires advance acquisition, permissions, capacity, sequencing, trust, ecological establishment, state transfer, or infrastructure, so waiting until failure is visible converts an orderly transition into emergency evacuation, abandonment, fragmentation, or collapse.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A subject that cannot move quickly enough is losing viable space between a directional pressure front and a rear boundary treated as fixed. Ordinary adaptation inside the shrinking zone buys time but can increase sunk costs and reduce future mobility. Movement requires advance acquisition, permissions, capacity, sequencing, trust, ecological establishment, state transfer, or infrastructure, so waiting until failure is visible converts an orderly transition into emergency evacuation, abandonment, fragmentation, or collapse."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "An advancing boundary moves inward at a definite rate through the subject's occupied region.", "role_mapping": "Directional front -> advancing boundary; ordered state space -> occupied region.", "slug": "coastal_squeeze", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b039_a08_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A front is advancing directionally through geography, a network, a market, a technical lifecycle, a policy regime, or another ordered state space. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A front is advancing directionally through geography, a network, a market, a technical lifecycle, a policy regime, or another ordered state space."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Coastal Squeeze", "one_liner": "An immobile subject is compressed between an advancing front and a fixed rear, with no exit.", "page_ref": "prime:coastal_squeeze", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Directional front -> advancing boundary; ordered state space -> occupied region.", "slug": "coastal_squeeze", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "An advancing boundary moves inward at a definite rate through the subject's occupied region."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A directional front advances through an ordered geography, network, market, lifecycle, policy regime, or state space.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A fixed rear boundary blocks migration opposite the advancing front.", "role_mapping": "Rear constraint -> fixed boundary; retreat -> subject migration.", "slug": "coastal_squeeze", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b039_a08_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A rear constraint blocks retreat, migration, reconfiguration, or transfer and is fixed on the timescale that matters unless deliberately changed. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A rear constraint blocks retreat, migration, reconfiguration, or transfer and is fixed on the timescale that matters unless deliberately changed."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Coastal Squeeze", "one_liner": "An immobile subject is compressed between an advancing front and a fixed rear, with no exit.", "page_ref": "prime:coastal_squeeze", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Rear constraint -> fixed boundary; retreat -> subject migration.", "slug": "coastal_squeeze", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A fixed rear boundary blocks migration opposite the advancing front."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A rear constraint blocks retreat or transfer and remains fixed on the relevant timescale unless deliberately moved.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Monotonic range compression approaches a viability threshold before width reaches zero.", "role_mapping": "Operating envelope -> available range; minimum viability -> range-width threshold.", "slug": "coastal_squeeze", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b039_a08_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The exposed subject has a minimum viable width, operating envelope, connectivity, or dependency set that is shrinking. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The exposed subject has a minimum viable width, operating envelope, connectivity, or dependency set that is shrinking."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Coastal Squeeze", "one_liner": "An immobile subject is compressed between an advancing front and a fixed rear, with no exit.", "page_ref": "prime:coastal_squeeze", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Operating envelope -> available range; minimum viability -> range-width threshold.", "slug": "coastal_squeeze", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Monotonic range compression approaches a viability threshold before width reaches zero."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The exposed subject's viable width, operating envelope, connectivity, or dependency set shrinks toward a collapse threshold.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P075-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a movement or transition that needs advance preparation or sequencing rather than instantaneous relocation.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An orderly movement process requires a focal lead time.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a closing opportunity with a remaining time horizon, not an open-ended movement window.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A finite horizon remains before the movement opportunity or viable space closes.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve these two time quantities as the terms of the same feasibility-relevant comparison.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The movement lead time is compared with the remaining closure horizon.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve approximate comparability between required lead time and time remaining before closure.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The movement lead time is comparable to the remaining closure horizon.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve required lead time exceeding the time remaining before closure.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The movement lead time is longer than the remaining closure horizon.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Orderly movement requires lead time comparable to or longer than the remaining closure horizon.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "The lead time for orderly movement is comparable to or longer than the remaining closure horizon.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P075-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Coastal squeeze entails a closing range but not the lead time of an available orderly movement process.", "slug": "coastal_squeeze"}], "residual_id": "r:managed_retreat:b039_a08_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b039_a08_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Orderly movement has a lead time comparable to or longer than the remaining closure horizon. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Orderly movement has a lead time comparable to or longer than the remaining closure horizon."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Counterexample attempt: preserve a complete last_mile_distribution_failure instance under this mapping while falsifying 'The lead time for orderly movement is comparable to or longer than the remaining closure horizon.'. The attempt fails because the cited evidence directly entails every obligation in branch O1, O2, O3, O4. I attempted to preserve a complete last_mile_distribution_failure instance while falsifying every DNF branch, but the exact structural commitments rule that counterexample out.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Last-Mile Distribution Failure", "one_liner": "Diagnose why supplies present at a staging area cause the same harm as supplies absent — the final-leg disaggregation takes longer than the consequence window allows — splitting trunk-delivery success from the tactical-delivery success the metrics conceal.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:last_mile_distribution_failure", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "last_mile_distribution_failure"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "last_mile_distribution_failure", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P075-C14-U1", "why_it_fits": "SSD passes: Final-leg disaggregation maps to orderly movement lead time, and the consequence window to the remaining viability horizon that closes before delivery completes. The exact record directly states that final-leg movement takes longer than the remaining consequence window. The exact record and any emitted qualifier satisfy one complete DNF branch (O1, O2, O3, O4) without combining evidence across branches. No qualifier is used, so qualifier laundering and bridge generality are not applicable."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Orderly movement requires lead time comparable to or longer than the remaining closure horizon.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Managed retreat is the staged response and cannot establish the antecedent comparative harm without circularly assuming the intervention.", "slug": "managed_retreat"}], "residual_id": "r:managed_retreat:b039_a08_c6", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b039_a08_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The costs and harms of forced displacement, stranded investment, or abrupt failure materially exceed the costs of staged retreat. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The costs and harms of forced displacement, stranded investment, or abrupt failure materially exceed the costs of staged retreat."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Managed retreat is the staged response and cannot establish the antecedent comparative harm without circularly assuming the intervention.", "slug": "managed_retreat"}], "normalized_requirement": "Forced displacement, stranding, or abrupt failure would cause materially greater harm than staged retreat.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Forced displacement, stranding, or abrupt failure would cause materially greater harm than staged retreat.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P075-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve continued staying or occupancy by the same subject whose future mobility is at issue.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A focal subject continues to remain in its current place or configuration.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve new or additional barriers, commitments, or dependencies that make later movement harder.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Lock-in affecting later movement increases.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve remaining in place as the cause of increasing lock-in, not merely a coincidentally locked-in state.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Continued staying creates the additional lock-in.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Remaining in place creates additional lock-in.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Continuing to remain in place creates additional lock-in.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P075-C15-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P075-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve continued staying or occupancy by the same subject whose recoverable value is at issue.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A focal subject continues to remain in its current place or configuration.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve loss of value that could otherwise be recovered through earlier movement, transfer, or exit.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Recoverable salvage value decreases over continued staying.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve remaining in place as the cause of declining salvage value, not unrelated depreciation alone.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Continued staying causes the salvage-value reduction.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Remaining in place reduces salvage value.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Continuing to remain in place reduces recoverable salvage value.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P075-C15-U2"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P075-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a continued-staying decision as the action generating the focal redistribution of risk.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A focal subject or decision-making unit continues to remain in place.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve actors whose ability to relocate, exit, or avoid exposure is comparatively lower.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Other affected actors have lower mobility than the focal subject or decision-makers.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a directional shift or concentration of risk onto those less mobile actors.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Risk is transferred toward the less mobile actors.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the decision to remain as what shifts risk, not a preexisting exposure unrelated to that decision.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Continued staying causes the risk transfer.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Remaining in place transfers risk to less mobile actors.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Continuing to remain in place transfers risk toward less mobile actors.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P075-C15-U3"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The response can be chosen before continued occupancy has created new lock-in or risk transfer.", "slug": "managed_retreat"}], "residual_id": "r:managed_retreat:b039_a08_c8", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b039_a08_c8", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The choice to stay is creating new lock-in, reducing salvage value, or transferring risk to less mobile actors. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The choice to stay is creating new lock-in, reducing salvage value, or transferring risk to less mobile actors."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 3, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 3}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The response can be chosen before continued occupancy has created new lock-in or risk transfer.", "slug": "managed_retreat"}], "normalized_requirement": "Remaining in place creates additional lock-in, destroys salvage value, or transfers risk to less mobile actors.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 3 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Remaining in place creates additional lock-in, destroys salvage value, or transfers risk to less mobile actors.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [8], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A receiving zone or successor configuration can plausibly be created, reserved, or made viable.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: A receiving zone or successor configuration can plausibly be created, reserved, or made viable. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A receiving zone or successor configuration can plausibly be created, reserved, or made viable."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "A receiving zone or successor configuration can plausibly be created, reserved, or made viable."}, {"display_text": "Decision-makers can observe at least the front, rear constraint, corridor, destination, and transition progress with enough fidelity to revise the plan.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A subject that cannot move quickly enough is losing viable space between a directional pressure front and a rear boundary treated as fixed. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: Decision-makers can observe at least the front, rear constraint, corridor, destination, and transition progress with enough fidelity to revise the plan. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Decision-makers can observe at least the front, rear constraint, corridor, destination, and transition progress with enough fidelity to revise the plan.", "A subject that cannot move quickly enough is losing viable space between a directional pressure front and a rear boundary treated as fixed."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "Decision-makers can observe at least the front, rear constraint, corridor, destination, and transition progress with enough fidelity to revise the plan."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 39, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-039", "ledger_sha256": "d3193996ed4801fb57ab3256da8053c3558c43ae0e9d3f18c6c559a8aa42e06d"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Mandatory / Default Rule Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:mandatory_default_rule_design", "slug": "mandatory_default_rule_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 5, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system treats all norms as either commands or optional advice, without a disciplined way to select force. Important protections become weak defaults, while ordinary preferences become coercive mandates. Opt-outs may be fictional, exceptions arbitrary, enforcement selective, and temporary restrictions permanent.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system treats all norms as either commands or optional advice, without a disciplined way to select force. Important protections become weak defaults, while ordinary preferences become coercive mandates. Opt-outs may be fictional, exceptions arbitrary, enforcement selective, and temporary restrictions permanent."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P076-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve one rule whose degree of binding force is under dispute.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A focal rule governs stakeholder conduct.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve at least two stakeholder positions, not uncertainty within one actor alone.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Multiple stakeholders hold positions on that rule's force.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail actual disagreement about rule force, not merely the existence of different rule types.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The stakeholders dispute the rule's force.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the binding-versus-guiding contrast for the same rule and must not substitute override mechanics.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The disputed poles are binding force and merely guiding or advisory force.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Stakeholders dispute whether a rule should bind or merely guide.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Stakeholders dispute whether a focal rule should bind or merely guide.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P076-C01-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime classifies bindingness modes and can apply where all stakeholders agree.", "slug": "mandatory_vs_default_norms"}], "residual_id": "r:mandatory_default_rule_design:b039_a09_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b039_a09_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Stakeholders dispute whether a rule should bind or merely guide. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders dispute whether a rule should bind or merely guide."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime classifies bindingness modes and can apply where all stakeholders agree.", "slug": "mandatory_vs_default_norms"}], "normalized_requirement": "Stakeholders dispute whether a rule should be binding or override-permitted.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Stakeholders dispute whether a rule should be binding or override-permitted.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P076-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the same individual as both subject to and departing from the rule.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An individual is governed by a focal rule and can depart from it.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a distinct affected party rather than only self-regarding consequences.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A party other than the departing individual, including a dependent party, is exposed to the consequence.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the departure as a possible cause of harm to the distinct party.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The individual's rule departure can impose harm on that other party.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve can-modality and need not require every departure to cause harm.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The third-party harm is possible rather than asserted as inevitable or already actual.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve consequential harm rather than a trivial preference difference or inconvenience.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The possible harm is material.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "An individual's departure from the rule can impose material harm on other or dependent parties.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Departure by a rule-governed individual can materially harm another or dependent party.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P076-C02-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Dependency does not entail that departure from a rule causes material harm.", "slug": "dependency"}], "residual_id": "r:mandatory_default_rule_design:b039_a09_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b039_a09_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Individual departure can impose material harm on others or dependent parties. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Individual departure can impose material harm on others or dependent parties."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Dependency does not entail that departure from a rule causes material harm.", "slug": "dependency"}], "normalized_requirement": "An individual's departure from the rule can impose material harm on other or dependent parties.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "An individual's departure from the rule can impose material harm on other or dependent parties.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A default rule has an override but need not face legitimate contextual variation or coordinate most cases.", "slug": "mandatory_vs_default_norms"}], "residual_id": "r:mandatory_default_rule_design:b039_a09_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b039_a09_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A default could coordinate most cases but preferences or contexts legitimately vary. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A default could coordinate most cases but preferences or contexts legitimately vary."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A default rule has an override but need not face legitimate contextual variation or coordinate most cases.", "slug": "mandatory_vs_default_norms"}], "normalized_requirement": "A default can coordinate most cases while legitimate preferences or contexts vary.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A default can coordinate most cases while legitimate preferences or contexts vary.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P076-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve binding rule force rather than an optional guideline or default.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A focal rule is mandatory.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the rule as the cause of the selected consequence rather than a coincident constraint.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The mandatory rule creates the selected consequence.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve prospective foreseeability rather than require only an unforeseen realized effect.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The selected consequence is foreseeable.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires hardship as the foreseeable consequence of the mandatory rule.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The mandatory rule creates foreseeable hardship.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires diversity in implementation as the foreseeable consequence of the mandatory rule.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The mandatory rule creates foreseeable implementation diversity.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires risk to innovation as the foreseeable consequence of the mandatory rule.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The mandatory rule creates foreseeable innovation risk.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A mandatory rule creates foreseeable hardship, implementation diversity, or innovation risk.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A mandatory rule creates one foreseeable listed consequence.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P076-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Binding-versus-default classification does not require an actual hardship or innovation consequence.", "slug": "mandatory_vs_default_norms"}], "residual_id": "r:mandatory_default_rule_design:b039_a09_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b039_a09_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A mandatory rule creates foreseeable hardship, implementation diversity, or innovation risk. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A mandatory rule creates foreseeable hardship, implementation diversity, or innovation risk."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Binding-versus-default classification does not require an actual hardship or innovation consequence.", "slug": "mandatory_vs_default_norms"}], "normalized_requirement": "A mandatory rule creates foreseeable hardship, implementation diversity, or innovation risk.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A mandatory rule creates foreseeable hardship, implementation diversity, or innovation risk.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P076-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve operative rules rather than a proposed or hypothetical rule alone.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Existing rules govern the focal setting.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve broad compliance, not isolated or rare obedience.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The existing rules are widely obeyed.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the contrast between widespread obedience and continued poor results.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Broad compliance coexists with a poor selected result dimension.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires poor substantive outcomes as the adverse result dimension.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Outcomes remain poor despite widespread obedience.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires an adverse burden level or distribution as the result dimension.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The burden profile remains poor despite widespread obedience.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires poor legitimacy as the adverse result dimension.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "Legitimacy remains poor despite widespread obedience.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Existing rules are widely obeyed while outcomes, burdens, or legitimacy remain poor.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Existing rules are widely obeyed while one listed result dimension remains poor.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P076-C04-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Legitimacy can be high or low independently of widespread rule compliance and poor outcomes.", "slug": "legitimacy"}], "residual_id": "r:mandatory_default_rule_design:b039_a09_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b039_a09_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Existing rules are widely obeyed yet outcomes, burden, or legitimacy remain poor. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Existing rules are widely obeyed yet outcomes, burden, or legitimacy remain poor."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Legitimacy can be high or low independently of widespread rule compliance and poor outcomes.", "slug": "legitimacy"}], "normalized_requirement": "Existing rules are widely obeyed while outcomes, burdens, or legitimacy remain poor.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Existing rules are widely obeyed while outcomes, burdens, or legitimacy remain poor.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 39, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-039", "ledger_sha256": "d3193996ed4801fb57ab3256da8053c3558c43ae0e9d3f18c6c559a8aa42e06d"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Mapping-Fidelity Distortion Control", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:mapping_fidelity_distortion_control", "slug": "mapping_fidelity_distortion_control"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 2, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A downstream user or system relies on an output as a faithful rendering of an input, but the mapping that produced the output introduces systematic, repeatable deviation. The deviation may be numerical, spatial, temporal, semantic, visual, causal, class-specific, or range-specific, and it can be mistaken for a real property of the source.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A downstream user or system relies on an output as a faithful rendering of an input, but the mapping that produced the output introduces systematic, repeatable deviation. The deviation may be numerical, spatial, temporal, semantic, visual, causal, class-specific, or range-specific, and it can be mistaken for a real property of the source."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P076-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O9"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an output produced by a mapping or transformation, not an unprocessed source alone.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A mapping process produces a focal output.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve operational or epistemic reliance, not mere availability or observation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A downstream user or system relies on that mapped output.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires an evidentiary use of the mapped output.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The mapped output is relied on as evidence.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires use of the mapped output as a representation of something else.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The mapped output is relied on as a representation.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires use of the mapped output as a score.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The mapped output is relied on as a score.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires use of the mapped output as a map.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The mapped output is relied on as a map.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires use of the mapped output as a summary.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The mapped output is relied on as a summary.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires use of the mapped output as a reproduction.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The mapped output is relied on as a reproduction.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires the mapped output to inform a decision.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "The mapped output is relied on as a decision input.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A mapped output is relied on as evidence, representation, score, map, summary, reproduction, or decision input.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A mapped output is relied upon in one listed downstream role.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P076-C05-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Distortion can be characterized in an experimental mapping whose output has no downstream evidentiary use.", "slug": "distortion"}], "residual_id": "r:mapping_fidelity_distortion_control:b039_a10_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b039_a10_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: An output is used as evidence, representation, score, map, summary, reproduction, or decision input. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["An output is used as evidence, representation, score, map, summary, reproduction, or decision input."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A near-equivalence record that exists but is never consulted would falsify reliance; the guard is false in exactly that counterexample.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Near-equivalence Mapping", "one_liner": "Bridge two concepts in different controlled vocabularies with a declared correspondence that carries an explicit, typed loss-risk on the bridge itself, so consumers can route each substitution on whether their use falls in the safe zone.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:near_equivalence_mapping", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2", "O9"], "guard_type": "MODALITY_ACTUALIZATION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "consumer_uses_near_equivalence_as_decision_input", "predicate": "A downstream consumer uses the near-equivalence mapping to decide whether to substitute the target concept for the source concept.", "rationale": "Independent SSD review preserves subtype roles, relation direction, polarity or modality, and one complete DNF branch. The single qualifier is candidate-anchored, fills exactly the stated guardable gaps, and survives the post-qualifier counterexample test."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "near_equivalence_mapping"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "consumer_uses_near_equivalence_as_decision_input"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "near_equivalence_mapping", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P076-C05-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent SSD adjudication confirms The DSA supplies the typed mapped-output spine, and one atomic actual-use fact completes the decision-input branch without adding another relation family. The exact evidence and any single emitted qualifier jointly satisfy complete DNF branch (O1, O2, O9); no obligation was borrowed from a different branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "An authored schema mapping with no downstream consumer would not satisfy reliance; that instance also fails the proposed guard.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Schema Mapping Relation", "one_liner": "Bridge two independently governed classification schemes with an explicit, typed assertion — source concept, target concept, and a fidelity grade (exact / close / broader / narrower / related) — so consumers know exactly what the bridge guarantees without merging the schemes.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:schema_mapping_relation", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2", "O9"], "guard_type": "MODALITY_ACTUALIZATION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "consumer_uses_schema_mapping_as_decision_input", "predicate": "A downstream consumer uses the schema mapping to decide what inference or substitution the correspondence grade permits.", "rationale": "Independent SSD review preserves subtype roles, relation direction, polarity or modality, and one complete DNF branch. The single qualifier is candidate-anchored, fills exactly the stated guardable gaps, and survives the post-qualifier counterexample test."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "schema_mapping_relation"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "consumer_uses_schema_mapping_as_decision_input"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "schema_mapping_relation", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P076-C05-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent SSD adjudication confirms The explicit typed mapping is the same output structure, while one actual-consumer-use qualifier completes a full decision-input DNF branch. The exact evidence and any single emitted qualifier jointly satisfy complete DNF branch (O1, O2, O9); no obligation was borrowed from a different branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Every instance includes a context transformation producing a rendered representation that a user interprets, even when the failure is silent and partial.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Responsive-Layout Breakage", "one_liner": "Diagnose the silent UI failure where an interface's content survives a viewport, device, or locale transformation but its layout-encoded meaning — priority, adjacency, hierarchy, above-the-fold prominence — is lost, so a passing content-accessibility check actively conceals the defect.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:responsive_layout_breakage", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "responsive_layout_breakage"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "responsive_layout_breakage", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P076-C05-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent SSD adjudication confirms A locale-only reflow can preserve content while losing layout meaning, but the user still relies on the transformed display as the representation encountered. The exact evidence and any single emitted qualifier jointly satisfy complete DNF branch (O1, O2, O4); no obligation was borrowed from a different branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "The exact record entails a translation output that subsequently runs under a semantic-equivalence contract, a relied-on reproduction branch.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Compiler", "one_liner": "Translate a fully specified source language ahead of time into a semantically equivalent target form through a pipeline of formal-interface phases, so the whole program can be globally analysed and optimised once while its observable behaviour is guaranteed preserved.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:compiler", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "compiler"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "compiler", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P076-C05-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent SSD adjudication confirms Even a target artifact that is never run would not instantiate the candidate's independently runnable, subsequently executing artifact boundary. The exact evidence and any single emitted qualifier jointly satisfy complete DNF branch (O1, O2, O8); no obligation was borrowed from a different branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "The candidate universally includes a produced reference label and an apparatus that scores against it as ground truth.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Ground-Truth Drift", "one_liner": "The model-evaluation failure in which the operational definition of the correct answer drifts on a clock the monitoring apparatus cannot see, so metrics keep scoring against a moved target while the dashboards stay green — invisible because every detector consumes current ground truth as its reference.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:ground_truth_drift", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "ground_truth_drift"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "ground_truth_drift", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P076-C05-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent SSD adjudication confirms Even when a dashboard remains green, it continues to consume the current mapped label as its reference, so reliance is not optional. The exact evidence and any single emitted qualifier jointly satisfy complete DNF branch (O1, O2, O3); no obligation was borrowed from a different branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Every candidate instance contains a representational output whose harm is specifically its downstream consumption as unmanipulated.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Manipulated Media", "one_liner": "A representational artifact whose link to the source event it purports to depict has been silently broken — through deceptive production, attribution, or context — while it retains the surface markers audiences use to infer authenticity.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:manipulated_media", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "manipulated_media"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "manipulated_media", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P076-C05-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent SSD adjudication confirms A context-only manipulation leaves pixels authentic but still silently breaks the artifact-to-source mapping consumed by the audience. The exact evidence and any single emitted qualifier jointly satisfy complete DNF branch (O1, O2, O4); no obligation was borrowed from a different branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "The exact record explicitly supplies the produced fused output and downstream readers who consume it as observational evidence.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Fieldnote Backfill", "one_liner": "The validity threat by which a delayed field write-up silently fuses direct observation, inference, and gap-filling reconstruction into one undifferentiated register, collapsing the attribution that tells the strongest evidence from the weakest.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:fieldnote_backfill", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "fieldnote_backfill"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "fieldnote_backfill", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P076-C05-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent SSD adjudication confirms A thin fieldnote still qualifies only when downstream readers cannot recover the observation-versus-reconstruction attribution from the fused record. The exact evidence and any single emitted qualifier jointly satisfy complete DNF branch (O1, O2, O3); no obligation was borrowed from a different branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A declared equivalence retained only for archival purposes would have no actual reliance; it would fail the guard as well as the source unit.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Declared Equivalence Mapping", "one_liner": "An explicit, authoritative, versioned assertion that two concepts from different vocabularies are interchangeable for stated purposes — collapsing a cross-scheme distinction to zero for consumers who trust the declaration rather than re-verifying at use-time.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:declared_equivalence_mapping", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2", "O9"], "guard_type": "MODALITY_ACTUALIZATION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "consumer_uses_declared_equivalence_as_decision_input", "predicate": "A downstream consumer relies on the declared equivalence when deciding to substitute one mapped concept for the other.", "rationale": "Independent SSD review preserves subtype roles, relation direction, polarity or modality, and one complete DNF branch. The single qualifier is candidate-anchored, fills exactly the stated guardable gaps, and survives the post-qualifier counterexample test."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "declared_equivalence_mapping"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "consumer_uses_declared_equivalence_as_decision_input"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "declared_equivalence_mapping", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P076-C05-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent SSD adjudication confirms The candidate supplies the mapped declaration and its consumer route; one atomic actualization guard makes the output a relied-on decision input. The exact evidence and any single emitted qualifier jointly satisfy complete DNF branch (O1, O2, O9); no obligation was borrowed from a different branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_SYNTHESIS", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "The unguarded neglect subtype preserves a complete common-operating-picture breakdown while participants do not rely on the picture. It fails the consultation guard; with that guard, O1, O2, and O4 are jointly necessary.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Common-Operating-Picture Breakdown", "one_liner": "The failure mode where a multi-party response acts incoherently because its engineered shared picture fails to synthesise participants' partial views — relocating the fault from the responders to the artefact, whose currency, completeness, and consistency become the lever.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:common_operating_picture_breakdown", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2"], "guard_type": "MODALITY_ACTUALIZATION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "participants_consult_shared_picture_before_action", "predicate": "Participants consult the engineered shared picture before taking action.", "rationale": "Independent SSD review preserves subtype roles, relation direction, polarity or modality, and one complete DNF branch. The single qualifier is candidate-anchored, fills exactly the stated guardable gaps, and survives the post-qualifier counterexample test."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "common_operating_picture_breakdown"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "participants_consult_shared_picture_before_action"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "common_operating_picture_breakdown", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P076-C05-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent SSD adjudication confirms SSD passes only with one modality-actualization qualifier. The exact record directly supplies the synthesized representation and its participant roles, and actual consultation closes the sole live gap on complete DNF branch O1+O2+O4 without laundering the head. The exact evidence and any single emitted qualifier jointly satisfy complete DNF branch (O1, O2, O4); no obligation was borrowed from a different branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "The record explicitly entails raw-signal transformation, presentation, and downstream planning or decision uptake.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "False Precision", "one_liner": "The measurement-communication fallacy of expressing a quantity with more significant figures or tighter bounds than the underlying evidence supports — a mismatch between the form of the claim and its warrant, read by audiences as unearned precision of knowledge.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:false_precision", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "false_precision"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "false_precision", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P076-C05-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent SSD adjudication confirms An exactly correct central value still qualifies because audiences rely on the surplus resolution, not because the central estimate must be wrong. The exact evidence and any single emitted qualifier jointly satisfy complete DNF branch (O1, O2, O3); no obligation was borrowed from a different branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "The candidate universally includes a mutable mapped reference and an evaluation system that treats it as fixed and authoritative.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Gold-Standard Erosion", "one_liner": "Recognize that a model scored against a mutable reference label can show stable metrics while its real validity silently degrades, because the answer key — not the model — has drifted away from the construct it once operationalized.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:gold_standard_erosion", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "gold_standard_erosion"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "gold_standard_erosion", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P076-C05-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent SSD adjudication confirms A stable headline metric is the candidate's deceptive case, but it still depends on the drifted reference label as its scoring input. The exact evidence and any single emitted qualifier jointly satisfy complete DNF branch (O1, O2, O3); no obligation was borrowed from a different branch."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A mapped output is relied on as evidence, representation, score, map, summary, reproduction, or decision input.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact genus is deterministic mapping-induced deviation from a faithful reference.", "role_mapping": "Input and output -> mapped source and rendering; transfer behavior -> actual mapping.", "slug": "distortion", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "Undersampling is a specific mapping that folds distinct source states into false output structure.", "role_mapping": "Input -> continuous source; output -> samples; transfer behavior -> folding map.", "slug": "aliasing", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "A nonlinear transfer function systematically generates output components absent from the input.", "role_mapping": "Input and output -> signal spectra; transfer behavior -> nonlinear mapping.", "slug": "harmonic_distortion", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b039_a10_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The transformation from input to output has known or suspected transfer behavior rather than neutral copying. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The transformation from input to output has known or suspected transfer behavior rather than neutral copying."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Distortion", "one_liner": "Systematic, mapping-induced deviation of an output from a faithful rendering of its input.", "page_ref": "prime:distortion", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Input and output -> mapped source and rendering; transfer behavior -> actual mapping.", "slug": "distortion", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact genus is deterministic mapping-induced deviation from a faithful reference."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Aliasing", "one_liner": "Sampling a signal below the rate its information content demands folds distinct high-frequency states onto identical low-frequency ones, fabricating false structure that masquerades as real signal.", "page_ref": "prime:aliasing", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Input -> continuous source; output -> samples; transfer behavior -> folding map.", "slug": "aliasing", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Undersampling is a specific mapping that folds distinct source states into false output structure."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Harmonic Distortion", "one_liner": "Passing a signal through a nonlinear transfer function generates new frequency components — harmonics and intermodulation products — absent from the input, an artifact of the nonlinearity itself rather than of any sampling or discretization.", "page_ref": "prime:harmonic_distortion", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Input and output -> signal spectra; transfer behavior -> nonlinear mapping.", "slug": "harmonic_distortion", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A nonlinear transfer function systematically generates output components absent from the input."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The input-output transformation has a non-neutral, characterizable transfer behavior that systematically changes the rendering.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Repeatability and a characterizable deviation shape are mandatory boundaries from random noise.", "role_mapping": "Systematic profile -> deterministic difference function.", "slug": "distortion", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The fold is governed by a sharp sampling-rate boundary and exposes a reproducible frequency profile.", "role_mapping": "Frequency or range -> sampling regime; deviation -> folded spectrum.", "slug": "aliasing", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "Generated harmonics and intermodulation products vary diagnostically with nonlinearity and amplitude.", "role_mapping": "Operating range or frequency -> transfer curve regime.", "slug": "harmonic_distortion", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b039_a10_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Deviation is systematic enough to profile across operating range, class, frequency, region, group, or context. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Deviation is systematic enough to profile across operating range, class, frequency, region, group, or context."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Distortion", "one_liner": "Systematic, mapping-induced deviation of an output from a faithful rendering of its input.", "page_ref": "prime:distortion", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Systematic profile -> deterministic difference function.", "slug": "distortion", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Repeatability and a characterizable deviation shape are mandatory boundaries from random noise."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Aliasing", "one_liner": "Sampling a signal below the rate its information content demands folds distinct high-frequency states onto identical low-frequency ones, fabricating false structure that masquerades as real signal.", "page_ref": "prime:aliasing", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Frequency or range -> sampling regime; deviation -> folded spectrum.", "slug": "aliasing", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The fold is governed by a sharp sampling-rate boundary and exposes a reproducible frequency profile."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Harmonic Distortion", "one_liner": "Passing a signal through a nonlinear transfer function generates new frequency components — harmonics and intermodulation products — absent from the input, an artifact of the nonlinearity itself rather than of any sampling or discretization.", "page_ref": "prime:harmonic_distortion", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Operating range or frequency -> transfer curve regime.", "slug": "harmonic_distortion", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Generated harmonics and intermodulation products vary diagnostically with nonlinearity and amplitude."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The deviation is repeatable and can be profiled across range, class, frequency, region, group, or context.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P076-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a modified output whose raw-versus-transformed status matters.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A focal output has been corrected or transformed rather than remaining raw.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve downstream interpreters, not a transformation with no possible user interpretation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Users interpret the focal output.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the mistaken raw-fact interpretation rather than correct recognition of transformation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Users can treat the modified output as a raw fact.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve may-modality and need not require every user to make the mistake.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The mistaken interpretation is possible rather than necessarily actual.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the unless-condition: the possibility remains where limits on interpreting the output are not explicit.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Explicit interpretation limits are absent or insufficient.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Users may mistake corrected or transformed outputs for raw facts unless interpretation limits are explicit.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Without explicit interpretation limits, users may mistake a corrected or transformed output for a raw fact.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P076-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A distortion can be recognized and labeled by every user; mistaken raw-fact interpretation is not constitutive.", "slug": "distortion"}], "residual_id": "r:mapping_fidelity_distortion_control:b039_a10_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b039_a10_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Users may treat corrected or transformed outputs as raw facts unless interpretation boundaries are explicit. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Users may treat corrected or transformed outputs as raw facts unless interpretation boundaries are explicit."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Even when metrics stay stable, the apparatus still mistakes the mutable reference for the construct itself, so every obligation remains entailed.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Gold-Standard Erosion", "one_liner": "Recognize that a model scored against a mutable reference label can show stable metrics while its real validity silently degrades, because the answer key — not the model — has drifted away from the construct it once operationalized.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:gold_standard_erosion", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "gold_standard_erosion"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "gold_standard_erosion", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P076-C06-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent SSD adjudication confirms The exact record directly supplies a transformed reference, user/system uptake as ground truth, possibility, and absent warning about the moved standard. The exact evidence and any single emitted qualifier jointly satisfy complete DNF branch (O1, O2, O3, O4, O5); no obligation was borrowed from a different branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_GUARDED_EQUIVALENT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A context-only manipulated clip can be frame-for-frame raw, so the candidate without branch selection does not universally satisfy the corrected-or-transformed obligation.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Manipulated Media", "one_liner": "A representational artifact whose link to the source event it purports to depict has been silently broken — through deceptive production, attribution, or context — while it retains the surface markers audiences use to infer authenticity.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:manipulated_media", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "production_axis_manipulation", "predicate": "The artifact is manipulated on the production axis by editing or fabrication.", "rationale": "Independent SSD review preserves subtype roles, relation direction, polarity or modality, and one complete DNF branch. The single qualifier is candidate-anchored, fills exactly the stated guardable gaps, and survives the post-qualifier counterexample test."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "manipulated_media"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "production_axis_manipulation"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "manipulated_media", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P076-C06-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent SSD adjudication confirms Selecting the candidate's explicit production-manipulation branch makes the artifact transformed; the remaining trigger obligations are already universal candidate commitments. The exact evidence and any single emitted qualifier jointly satisfy complete DNF branch (O1, O2, O3, O4, O5); no obligation was borrowed from a different branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A numerically correct central value still satisfies the trigger because users can mistake its surplus precision for raw factual resolution.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "False Precision", "one_liner": "The measurement-communication fallacy of expressing a quantity with more significant figures or tighter bounds than the underlying evidence supports — a mismatch between the form of the claim and its warrant, read by audiences as unearned precision of knowledge.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:false_precision", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "false_precision"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "false_precision", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P076-C06-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent SSD adjudication confirms The exact record directly entails a transformed presentation, user uptake as genuine knowledge, possibility, and failure to disclose the underlying limits. The exact evidence and any single emitted qualifier jointly satisfy complete DNF branch (O1, O2, O3, O4, O5); no obligation was borrowed from a different branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A statistically unchanged dashboard remains a counterexample to visible failure but not to the trigger: it still consumes the changed label as raw ground truth.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Ground-Truth Drift", "one_liner": "The model-evaluation failure in which the operational definition of the correct answer drifts on a clock the monitoring apparatus cannot see, so metrics keep scoring against a moved target while the dashboards stay green — invisible because every detector consumes current ground truth as its reference.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:ground_truth_drift", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "ground_truth_drift"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "ground_truth_drift", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P076-C06-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent SSD adjudication confirms The record directly entails a changed mapped output, consumer interpretation as truth, and an unflagged definition change. The exact evidence and any single emitted qualifier jointly satisfy complete DNF branch (O1, O2, O3, O4, O5); no obligation was borrowed from a different branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Even an originally accurate statement qualifies because the counterexample is blocked by the channel's cumulative removal of its scope and caveats.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Quote Laundering", "one_liner": "A provisional but accurate statement is cited across successive venues that each strip its caveats and scope, until it circulates as authoritative settled fact — a channel failure, not a false source, so it resists source correction and needs traceability instead.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:quote_laundering", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "quote_laundering"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "quote_laundering", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P076-C06-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent SSD adjudication confirms Caveat stripping directly supplies transformation and missing limits; circulation as authoritative fact directly supplies user interpretation and raw-fact uptake. The exact evidence and any single emitted qualifier jointly satisfy complete DNF branch (O1, O2, O3, O4, O5); no obligation was borrowed from a different branch."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Users may mistake corrected or transformed outputs for raw facts unless interpretation limits are explicit.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Raw inputs, references, benchmarks, calibration cases, or reconstruction tests can be retained or sampled.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: Raw inputs, references, benchmarks, calibration cases, or reconstruction tests can be retained or sampled. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Raw inputs, references, benchmarks, calibration cases, or reconstruction tests can be retained or sampled."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Raw inputs, references, benchmarks, calibration cases, or reconstruction tests can be retained or sampled."}, {"display_text": "Correction choices could themselves create overcorrection, hidden bias, or false certainty.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Correction choices could themselves create overcorrection, hidden bias, or false certainty. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Correction choices could themselves create overcorrection, hidden bias, or false certainty."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Correction choices could themselves create overcorrection, hidden bias, or false certainty."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 39, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-039", "ledger_sha256": "d3193996ed4801fb57ab3256da8053c3558c43ae0e9d3f18c6c559a8aa42e06d"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Mapping Reconciliation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:mapping_reconciliation", "slug": "mapping_reconciliation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 5, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a correspondence conflict. Local mappings may be reasonable inside their own context, but they become incompatible when systems or actors must interoperate. One team’s “active customer,” one jurisdiction’s “resident,” one dataset’s “completed event,” or one translation’s label may not match another team’s category even when the names appear similar.\n\nWithout reconciliation, downstream users see contradictory reports, failed integrations, duplicated work, unfair classifications, brittle conversions, and opaque exceptions. The system may appear to have a shared vocabulary while actually preserving several incompatible maps under the surface.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Multiple actors, systems, standards, schemas, vocabularies, or models map one domain to another in incompatible ways, causing translation errors, semantic mismatch, duplicated work, interoperability failure, inconsistent reporting, or contested decisions."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P076-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O4", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O4", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve at least two distinct operational systems.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Two systems participate in the same interoperability setting.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an exchange requirement rather than merely conceptual comparison.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The systems must exchange the selected operational object.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This exchange-object branch requires data exchange between the systems.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The systems must exchange data.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This exchange-object branch requires decision exchange or interoperability.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The systems must exchange decisions.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This mapping-type branch requires incompatible or distinct field mappings.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The systems use different field mappings.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This mapping-type branch requires incompatible or distinct category mappings.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The systems use different category mappings.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This mapping-type branch requires incompatible or distinct code mappings.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The systems use different code mappings.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Two interoperating systems use different field, category, or code mappings.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Two systems that must exchange data or decisions use different field, category, or code mappings.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P076-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Conceptual translation can occur between frameworks without two operational systems or schema mappings.", "slug": "translation_and_conceptual_bridging"}], "residual_id": "r:mapping_reconciliation:b039_a11_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b039_a11_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Two systems must exchange data or decisions but use different field mappings, category mappings, or code mappings. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Two systems must exchange data or decisions but use different field mappings, category mappings, or code mappings."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Conceptual translation can occur between frameworks without two operational systems or schema mappings.", "slug": "translation_and_conceptual_bridging"}], "normalized_requirement": "Two interoperating systems use different field, category, or code mappings.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Two interoperating systems use different field, category, or code mappings.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P076-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an operative crosswalk or mapping table, not an unimplemented mapping proposal.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A crosswalk containing correspondences exists.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve competing plural authorities rather than one authority's internal uncertainty.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "At least two teams, vendors, jurisdictions, standards, or comparable authorities take positions on the crosswalk.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail actual disagreement about mapping entries.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The authorities dispute correspondences in the crosswalk.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve consequential correspondences rather than immaterial formatting differences.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The disputed correspondences are material.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "A crosswalk exists but organizations or standards dispute material correspondences.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A crosswalk exists, but competing authorities dispute material correspondences within it.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P076-C08-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Record reconciliation can resolve differing field values under one shared schema without competing crosswalks.", "slug": "record_reconciliation"}], "residual_id": "r:mapping_reconciliation:b039_a11_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b039_a11_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A crosswalk exists but competing teams, vendors, jurisdictions, or standards disagree on important correspondences. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A crosswalk exists but competing teams, vendors, jurisdictions, or standards disagree on important correspondences."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Record reconciliation can resolve differing field values under one shared schema without competing crosswalks.", "slug": "record_reconciliation"}], "normalized_requirement": "A crosswalk exists but organizations or standards dispute material correspondences.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A crosswalk exists but organizations or standards dispute material correspondences.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P076-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O9"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve two interpretation roles focused on one mapping correspondence.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Two sides interpret the same mapped item.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an equivalence interpretation on one side.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "One side treats the mapped item as equivalent.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the asymmetric scope interpretation rather than shared equivalence.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The other side applies a nonequivalent selected scope interpretation.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve actual decision failure, not only possible semantic mismatch.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Downstream decisions fail.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the interpretation mismatch as a cause of failure.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The incompatible mapping interpretations cause the downstream decision failure.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a broader-than-equivalent interpretation.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The other side treats the mapped item as broader.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a narrower-than-equivalent interpretation.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The other side treats the mapped item as narrower.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a context-conditional interpretation.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The other side treats the mapped item as conditional.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires rejection of a correspondence relation.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "The other side treats the mapped item as unrelated.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Downstream decisions fail because mapped equivalence is interpreted as broader, narrower, conditional, or unrelated.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Downstream decisions fail because one side treats a mapped item as equivalent while the other gives it one listed nonequivalent scope.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P076-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Distortion need not arise from competing equivalence scopes or cause a downstream decision failure.", "slug": "distortion"}], "residual_id": "r:mapping_reconciliation:b039_a11_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b039_a11_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Downstream decisions fail because one side treats a mapped item as equivalent while another treats it as broader, narrower, conditional, or unrelated. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Downstream decisions fail because one side treats a mapped item as equivalent while another treats it as broader, narrower, conditional, or unrelated."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Distortion need not arise from competing equivalence scopes or cause a downstream decision failure.", "slug": "distortion"}], "normalized_requirement": "Downstream decisions fail because mapped equivalence is interpreted as broader, narrower, conditional, or unrelated.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Downstream decisions fail because mapped equivalence is interpreted as broader, narrower, conditional, or unrelated.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P076-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O8"], ["O1", "O3", "O7"], ["O1", "O3", "O8"], ["O1", "O4", "O7"], ["O1", "O4", "O8"], ["O1", "O5", "O7"], ["O1", "O5", "O8"], ["O1", "O6", "O7"], ["O1", "O6", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve discovery of contradictions during the focal activity, not merely the existence of mappings.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The selected activity exposes contradictions among the selected representations.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This activity branch requires migration work.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Migration is the activity that exposes the contradictions.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This activity branch requires integration work.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Integration is the activity that exposes the contradictions.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This activity branch requires merger work.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A merger is the activity that exposes the contradictions.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This activity branch requires policy-alignment work.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Policy alignment is the activity that exposes the contradictions.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This activity branch requires reporting work.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "Reporting is the activity that exposes the contradictions.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This representation branch requires contradictions among mapping tables.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "Mapping tables are the contradictory representations.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This representation branch requires contradictions among conceptual models.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "Conceptual models are the contradictory representations.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Migration, integration, merger, policy alignment, or reporting exposes contradictions among mapping tables or conceptual models.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "One listed alignment activity exposes contradictions among one listed mapping representation.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P076-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Record reconciliation need not involve mappings or conceptual models and can occur outside integration work.", "slug": "record_reconciliation"}], "residual_id": "r:mapping_reconciliation:b039_a11_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b039_a11_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Migration, integration, merger, policy alignment, or reporting work exposes contradictions among mapping tables or conceptual models. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Migration, integration, merger, policy alignment, or reporting work exposes contradictions among mapping tables or conceptual models."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Record reconciliation need not involve mappings or conceptual models and can occur outside integration work.", "slug": "record_reconciliation"}], "normalized_requirement": "Migration, integration, merger, policy alignment, or reporting exposes contradictions among mapping tables or conceptual models.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Migration, integration, merger, policy alignment, or reporting exposes contradictions among mapping tables or conceptual models.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P076-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve mapping or correspondence errors as the objects being repaired.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Mapping errors require correction across parties or representations.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve actual correction of mapping errors by the selected branch mechanism.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The selected repair mode fixes the mapping errors.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve repeated repair rather than a one-time exceptional correction.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The selected repair recurs.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the unmet shared-rule handling rather than a stable rule already performing the repairs.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A stable shared correspondence rule does not handle the mapping errors.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the source's normative requirement for stable shared-rule handling.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The mapping errors should be handled by a stable shared rule.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires manual translation and does not require an expert actor.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "Manual translation is the recurrent repair mode.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires judgment by an expert or specialist and does not require manual translation.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "Expert judgment is the recurrent repair mode.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Manual translation or expert judgment repeatedly fixes mapping errors that should be handled by a stable shared rule.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Mapping errors are repeatedly fixed by manual translation or expert judgment instead of a stable shared rule.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P076-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Comparison can be one-time and does not entail recurrent mapping errors or absent shared rules.", "slug": "comparison"}], "residual_id": "r:mapping_reconciliation:b039_a11_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b039_a11_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Manual translation or expert judgment repeatedly fixes mapping errors that should be handled by a stable shared rule. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Manual translation or expert judgment repeatedly fixes mapping errors that should be handled by a stable shared rule."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Comparison can be one-time and does not entail recurrent mapping errors or absent shared rules.", "slug": "comparison"}], "normalized_requirement": "Experts repeatedly repair mapping errors manually because no stable shared correspondence rule exists.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Experts repeatedly repair mapping errors manually because no stable shared correspondence rule exists.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 39, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-039", "ledger_sha256": "d3193996ed4801fb57ab3256da8053c3558c43ae0e9d3f18c6c559a8aa42e06d"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Marginal Stop Rule", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:marginal_stop_rule", "slug": "marginal_stop_rule"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is continuation without marginal justification. A system keeps adding input because it has already started, because earlier increments worked, because stopping is politically awkward, or because no one defined what evidence would be enough to stop.\n\nThe pattern often hides inside successful work. A campaign can still be producing conversions while the next block of spending is a poor use of money. A training plan can still build capacity while the next load increase adds more fatigue than adaptation. A project can still have a plausible roadmap while the next feature or refinement cycle contributes little to users. Total value and marginal value diverge.\n\nThe deeper tension is that commitment creates legitimacy, but marginal value changes. A path can be worth starting, worth continuing for a while, and then no longer worth the next increment.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A process keeps consuming additional resources because continuation is easier than judging whether the next increment is still worthwhile. Total past benefit, sunk cost, political momentum, or habit hides the weak marginal value of continued escalation."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Marginal analysis is explicitly about the next increment of a fine-grained choice variable.", "role_mapping": "Next unit -> marginal increment; input -> choice variable.", "slug": "marginal_analysis", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b039_a12_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A next unit of input is under consideration. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A next unit of input is under consideration."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Marginal Analysis", "one_liner": "Incremental effects.", "page_ref": "prime:marginal_analysis", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Next unit -> marginal increment; input -> choice variable.", "slug": "marginal_analysis", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Marginal analysis is explicitly about the next increment of a fine-grained choice variable."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A defined next unit of a repeatable choice variable is under consideration.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The method computes marginal benefit, cost, product, or value for an additional unit and compares them at the margin.", "role_mapping": "Benefit and burden -> marginal benefit and marginal cost; next unit -> finite difference.", "slug": "marginal_analysis", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b039_a12_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The next unit has estimable benefit and burden. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The next unit has estimable benefit and burden."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Marginal Analysis", "one_liner": "Incremental effects.", "page_ref": "prime:marginal_analysis", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Benefit and burden -> marginal benefit and marginal cost; next unit -> finite difference.", "slug": "marginal_analysis", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The method computes marginal benefit, cost, product, or value for an additional unit and compares them at the margin."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The next unit's incremental benefit and burden can be estimated on a comparable margin.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P076-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the temporal direction from prior performance to later continuation.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The cited success occurred in the past, while the proposed increments are future additions.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the justificatory use, not merely coexistence of past success and future action.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Past success is used as evidence to justify adding future increments.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires total accumulated success as the cited evidence.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Past total success supplies the justification.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires average success as the cited evidence.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Past average success supplies the justification.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Past total or average success is being used to justify adding future increments.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Past total or average success is used to justify adding future increments.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P076-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Diminishing returns describes a declining marginal response but does not require anyone to cite past success as justification.", "slug": "diminishing_returns"}], "residual_id": "r:marginal_stop_rule:b039_a12_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b039_a12_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Past success is being used as evidence for future increments. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Past success is being used as evidence for future increments."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A loop justified only by one anecdotal success would instantiate pilot purgatory but not total success; it fails the quantifier guard.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Pilot Purgatory", "one_liner": "Relocate the diagnosis of an initiative that keeps running successful pilots without ever scaling from 'weak evidence' to 'a missing transition mechanism' — the loop is sustained by each pilot's local success, and the fault sits one level up in the decision infrastructure.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:pilot_purgatory", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O3"], "guard_type": "QUANTIFIER_BINDING", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "pilot_evidence_is_total_past_success", "predicate": "The cited favorable pilot evidence is aggregated as total success across the completed prior pilot cycle.", "rationale": "Independent SSD review preserves subtype roles, relation direction, polarity or modality, and one complete DNF branch. The single qualifier is candidate-anchored, fills exactly the stated guardable gaps, and survives the post-qualifier counterexample test."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "pilot_purgatory"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "pilot_evidence_is_total_past_success"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "pilot_purgatory", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P076-C12-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent SSD adjudication confirms Pilot purgatory directly entails past favorable evidence justifying another future increment, and one atomic aggregation guard completes the total-success branch. The exact evidence and any single emitted qualifier jointly satisfy complete DNF branch (O1, O2, O3); no obligation was borrowed from a different branch."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Past total or average success is being used to justify adding future increments.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Continuation is not mandatory without review.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: Continuation is not mandatory without review. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Continuation is not mandatory without review."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Continuation is not mandatory without review."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 39, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-039", "ledger_sha256": "d3193996ed4801fb57ab3256da8053c3558c43ae0e9d3f18c6c559a8aa42e06d"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Marked Default Audit", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:marked_default_audit", "slug": "marked_default_audit"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is not just that a label is inaccurate. The problem is relational: a label becomes marked because another label is not. The unmarked term looks neutral because the system has made its assumption invisible.\n\nFor example, a product table may call one plan “standard” and name other plans by customer type. A documentation set may assume one platform in every example while calling out other platforms as exceptions. A data system may tag only non-baseline records, making the baseline difficult to inspect. In each case, the hidden baseline changes interpretation even when no one states a hierarchy directly.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A default category, label, example, user, option, language, region, or condition is treated as neutral or universal while parallel cases are specially named, qualified, warned about, routed as exceptions, or made to carry extra explanatory burden."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "An unmarked default contrasts with a more explicitly specified marked member.", "role_mapping": "Unqualified option -> unmarked default; named alternatives -> marked members.", "slug": "markedness", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b039_a13_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: One option is called “standard,” “normal,” “regular,” “default,” or simply left unnamed while alternatives are qualified. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["One option is called “standard,” “normal,” “regular,” “default,” or simply left unnamed while alternatives are qualified."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Markedness", "one_liner": "Default vs marked forms.", "page_ref": "prime:markedness", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Unqualified option -> unmarked default; named alternatives -> marked members.", "slug": "markedness", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "An unmarked default contrasts with a more explicitly specified marked member."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "One option is unmarked or called normal, standard, regular, or default while alternatives bear explicit qualification.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Markedness requires an asymmetric opposition between an overtly specified member and an unmarked baseline.", "role_mapping": "Named group -> marked member; invisible case -> unmarked default.", "slug": "markedness", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b039_a13_c2a", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A policy, taxonomy, interface, or document names one group or case but treats another as the invisible baseline. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A policy, taxonomy, interface, or document names one group or case but treats another as the invisible baseline."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Markedness", "one_liner": "Default vs marked forms.", "page_ref": "prime:markedness", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Named group -> marked member; invisible case -> unmarked default.", "slug": "markedness", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Markedness requires an asymmetric opposition between an overtly specified member and an unmarked baseline."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "One member of an opposition is explicitly named while a parallel member functions as an invisible baseline.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P076-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve marked versus unmarked case status as the observable cue.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A set of cases contains a marking distinction.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the marking-to-inference direction, not merely that marking and the attribute coexist.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Users infer an attribute from which cases are marked.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires legitimacy as the inferred attribute.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Users infer legitimacy from the marking pattern.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires priority as the inferred attribute.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Users infer priority from the marking pattern.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires risk as the inferred attribute.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Users infer risk from the marking pattern.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires burden as the inferred attribute.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "Users infer burden from the marking pattern.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires competence as the inferred attribute.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "Users infer competence from the marking pattern.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires status as the inferred attribute.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "Users infer status from the marking pattern.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Users infer legitimacy, priority, risk, burden, competence, or status from which cases are marked.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Users infer one listed attribute from which cases are marked.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P076-C13-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Markedness can be a morphological asymmetry without users inferring legitimacy, risk, or competence.", "slug": "markedness"}], "residual_id": "r:marked_default_audit:b039_a13_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b039_a13_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Users infer status, legitimacy, priority, risk, burden, or competence from which cases are marked. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Users infer status, legitimacy, priority, risk, burden, or competence from which cases are marked."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Markedness can be a morphological asymmetry without users inferring legitimacy, risk, or competence.", "slug": "markedness"}], "normalized_requirement": "Users infer legitimacy, priority, risk, burden, competence, or status from which cases are marked.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Users infer legitimacy, priority, risk, burden, competence, or status from which cases are marked.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Restricted marked members contrast with a broader unmarked default across contexts.", "role_mapping": "Exception category -> marked member; parallel case -> unmarked default.", "slug": "markedness", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b039_a13_c5a", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Classification, routing, eligibility, or documentation patterns repeatedly treat one category as an exception rather than a parallel case. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Classification, routing, eligibility, or documentation patterns repeatedly treat one category as an exception rather than a parallel case."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Markedness", "one_liner": "Default vs marked forms.", "page_ref": "prime:markedness", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Exception category -> marked member; parallel case -> unmarked default.", "slug": "markedness", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Restricted marked members contrast with a broader unmarked default across contexts."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A category is repeatedly represented as an exception against a parallel unmarked baseline.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A label revision or inclusion review keeps discovering asymmetries but lacks a structural method for deciding what to change.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The structural problem is not just that a label is inaccurate. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: A label revision or inclusion review keeps discovering asymmetries but lacks a structural method for deciding what to change. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A label revision or inclusion review keeps discovering asymmetries but lacks a structural method for deciding what to change.", "The structural problem is not just that a label is inaccurate."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "A label revision or inclusion review keeps discovering asymmetries but lacks a structural method for deciding what to change."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 39, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-039", "ledger_sha256": "d3193996ed4801fb57ab3256da8053c3558c43ae0e9d3f18c6c559a8aa42e06d"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Mastery-Gate Progression", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:mastery_gate_progression", "slug": "mastery_gate_progression"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 5 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A learning or capability-building sequence often advances people because a unit ended, a video was watched, a checklist was completed, or a cohort moved on. That can work when tasks are independent. It breaks when later work assumes earlier competence.\n\nThe structural problem is hidden gap accumulation. Once a prerequisite gap is carried forward, every dependent task becomes harder, feedback becomes noisier, and the learner may appear unable to handle advanced work when the actual issue is an unrepaired earlier capability.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Learners advance despite incomplete understanding, causing later failure, compounding confusion, or unsafe performance."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Unit-by-unit advancement is contingent on mastery of prerequisite capability.", "role_mapping": "Earlier capability -> prerequisite unit; later task -> dependent unit; reliability -> mastery threshold.", "slug": "mastery_learning", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b039_a14_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Later tasks, roles, modules, or responsibilities depend on an earlier capability being reliable. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Later tasks, roles, modules, or responsibilities depend on an earlier capability being reliable."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Mastery Learning", "one_liner": "Ensure full understanding.", "page_ref": "prime:mastery_learning", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Earlier capability -> prerequisite unit; later task -> dependent unit; reliability -> mastery threshold.", "slug": "mastery_learning", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Unit-by-unit advancement is contingent on mastery of prerequisite capability."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Later tasks or responsibilities depend on reliable mastery of an earlier capability.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P076-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve progression by the same learners whose competence is at issue.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Learners or trainees advance to a later stage.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve absence of competence evidence as the progression basis, not advancement after mastery.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Advancement occurs without demonstrated competence.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the proxy as the advancement criterion rather than incidental elapsed time or activity.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The selected completion proxy is what licenses or causes advancement.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires time elapsed as the basis for advancement.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Elapsed time is the advancement proxy.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires coverage or exposure to content as the basis for advancement.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Content exposure is the advancement proxy.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires completed activities as the basis for advancement.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "Activity completion is the advancement proxy.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Learners advance through elapsed time, content exposure, or activity completion without demonstrated competence.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Learners advance on a listed completion proxy rather than demonstrated competence.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P076-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Mastery learning requires the opposite: advancement is prohibited until demonstrated mastery.", "slug": "mastery_learning"}], "residual_id": "r:mastery_gate_progression:b039_a14_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b039_a14_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Learners or trainees are advancing because time elapsed, content was covered, or activities were completed, not because competence was demonstrated. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Learners or trainees are advancing because time elapsed, content was covered, or activities were completed, not because competence was demonstrated."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Mastery learning requires the opposite: advancement is prohibited until demonstrated mastery.", "slug": "mastery_learning"}], "normalized_requirement": "Learners advance through elapsed time, content exposure, or activity completion without demonstrated competence.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Learners advance through elapsed time, content exposure, or activity completion without demonstrated competence.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P077-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve actual later-stage failure rather than only possible learning difficulty.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Downstream failures occur.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve repeated failure rather than a single isolated event.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The downstream failure recurs.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a missing prerequisite that temporally and structurally precedes the downstream task.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "An earlier prerequisite capability gap remains unresolved.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the diagnostic attribution from the failures to the gap and need not independently establish that the gap objectively caused the failures.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The repeated downstream failures are traced to the unresolved prerequisite gap.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Repeated downstream failures are traced to unresolved prerequisite gaps.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Repeated downstream failures are traced to unresolved prerequisite gaps.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P077-C01-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Mastery learning can be instituted prospectively before repeated downstream failures occur.", "slug": "mastery_learning"}], "residual_id": "r:mastery_gate_progression:b039_a14_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b039_a14_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Downstream failure is repeatedly traced to unresolved prerequisite gaps. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Downstream failure is repeatedly traced to unresolved prerequisite gaps."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Mastery learning can be instituted prospectively before repeated downstream failures occur.", "slug": "mastery_learning"}], "normalized_requirement": "Repeated downstream failures are traced to unresolved prerequisite gaps.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Repeated downstream failures are traced to unresolved prerequisite gaps.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P077-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an evaluator role and a focal weak-performance observation.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A reviewer observes weak performance by a learner or trainee.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve task-specific difficulty as one live causal explanation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The new task is one possible cause of the weak performance.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an unobserved prerequisite deficit as the competing causal explanation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A hidden earlier capability gap is another possible cause of the same weak performance.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve unresolved causal attribution rather than a known diagnosis.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The reviewer cannot distinguish which of those causes produced the weak performance.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Reviewers cannot distinguish failure on the new task from a hidden earlier capability gap.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Reviewers cannot distinguish whether weak performance is caused by a new task or by a hidden earlier capability gap.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P077-C02-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Mastery learning's diagnostic assessments can make prerequisite gaps visible rather than hidden.", "slug": "mastery_learning"}], "residual_id": "r:mastery_gate_progression:b039_a14_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b039_a14_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Instructors, coaches, or supervisors cannot tell whether weak performance is caused by the new task or by a hidden earlier gap. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Instructors, coaches, or supervisors cannot tell whether weak performance is caused by the new task or by a hidden earlier gap."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Mastery learning's diagnostic assessments can make prerequisite gaps visible rather than hidden.", "slug": "mastery_learning"}], "normalized_requirement": "Reviewers cannot distinguish failure on the new task from a hidden earlier capability gap.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Reviewers cannot distinguish failure on the new task from a hidden earlier capability gap.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P077-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an assessment output that identifies the gap rather than a gap that remains wholly undetected.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An assessment identifies a focal capability gap.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve absence of a reliable remediation link for the detected gap.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The identified gap is not systematically connected to remediation.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve absence of a reliable reassessment link after the detected gap.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The identified gap is not systematically connected to retesting.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve both absent connections around the same identified gap, not unrelated remediation or testing defects.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Remediation and retesting are missing stages of the same gap-closing loop.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Assessment identifies gaps but does not systematically connect them to remediation and retesting.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Assessment identifies capability gaps but does not systematically connect them to remediation and retesting.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P077-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Immediate corrective remediation and reassessment are mandatory parts of mastery learning, the opposite of this failure state.", "slug": "mastery_learning"}], "residual_id": "r:mastery_gate_progression:b039_a14_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b039_a14_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Current assessment identifies gaps but does not systematically connect them to remediation and retesting. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Current assessment identifies gaps but does not systematically connect them to remediation and retesting."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Immediate corrective remediation and reassessment are mandatory parts of mastery learning, the opposite of this failure state.", "slug": "mastery_learning"}], "normalized_requirement": "Assessment identifies gaps but does not systematically connect them to remediation and retesting.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Assessment identifies gaps but does not systematically connect them to remediation and retesting.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Progression has safety, cost, quality, credentialing, or accountability consequences.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Progression has safety, cost, quality, credentialing, or accountability consequences. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Progression has safety, cost, quality, credentialing, or accountability consequences."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Progression has safety, cost, quality, credentialing, or accountability consequences."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 39, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-039", "ledger_sha256": "d3193996ed4801fb57ab3256da8053c3558c43ae0e9d3f18c6c559a8aa42e06d"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Material Literalness Foregrounding", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:material_literalness_foregrounding", "slug": "material_literalness_foregrounding"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 7 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 7}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A design, display, object, or communication is being interpreted through borrowed imagery, ornament, metaphor, decorative finish, or symbolic framing, causing users to miss the material properties, construction logic, medium constraints, or physical evidence that should govern understanding and action.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A design, display, object, or communication is being interpreted through borrowed imagery, ornament, metaphor, decorative finish, or symbolic framing, causing users to miss the material properties, construction logic, medium constraints, or physical evidence that should govern understanding and action."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Texture is defined as fine-grained surface variation carrying perceptual, material, functional, and emotional information rather than mere decoration.", "role_mapping": "Medium or material surface -> textured surface; information -> perceptual/material content.", "slug": "texture", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b039_a15_c1a", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The medium, material, fabrication process, surface, mass, or actual data mark carries important information that ornament or representation would obscure. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The medium, material, fabrication process, surface, mass, or actual data mark carries important information that ornament or representation would obscure."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Texture", "one_liner": "The fine-grained surface variation beneath an object's gross form that carries perceptual, material, and emotional information rather than mere decoration.", "page_ref": "prime:texture", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Medium or material surface -> textured surface; information -> perceptual/material content.", "slug": "texture", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Texture is defined as fine-grained surface variation carrying perceptual, material, functional, and emotional information rather than mere decoration."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Fine-grained surface or material variation carries perceptual or material information rather than functioning as mere decoration.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P077-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O9"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O10"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O11"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5", "O9"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5", "O10"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5", "O11"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an information-bearing feature of the artifact itself.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A literal material or data feature carries important information.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an obscuration relation, not merely coexistence of ornament and material information.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The selected decorative or representational layer obscures that information.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the source's would-modality.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The obscuration is prospective or counterfactual rather than necessarily already actual.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This obscurer branch requires ornament to obscure the literal information.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Ornament is the obscuring layer.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This obscurer branch requires representation to obscure the literal information.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Representation is the obscuring layer.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This carrier branch requires the medium itself as the information bearer.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The medium carries the important information.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This carrier branch requires material properties as the information bearer.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The material carries the important information.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This carrier branch requires fabrication evidence as the information bearer.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The fabrication process carries the important information.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This carrier branch requires the surface as the information bearer.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "The surface carries the important information.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This carrier branch requires mass as the information bearer.", "obligation_id": "O10", "statement": "The mass carries the important information.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This carrier branch requires the literal data mark as the information bearer.", "obligation_id": "O11", "statement": "The actual data mark carries the important information.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Ornament or representation would obscure the load-bearing information in the medium, fabrication, mass, surface, or data mark.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Ornament or representation would obscure important information carried by one listed literal material feature.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P077-C04-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Minimalism foregrounds literal presence but does not require that prior ornament was hiding load-bearing information.", "slug": "minimalism_in_art"}], "residual_id": "r:material_literalness_foregrounding:b039_a15_c1b", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b039_a15_c1b", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The medium, material, fabrication process, surface, mass, or actual data mark carries important information that ornament or representation would obscure. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The medium, material, fabrication process, surface, mass, or actual data mark carries important information that ornament or representation would obscure."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A neutral property description releases the block, confirming that the representational category layer rather than the literal material is what obscures the information.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Functional Fixedness", "one_liner": "The cognitive bias in which encoding an object under its conventional category label crowds out inspection of its raw physical properties, blocking the solver from a non-conventional use the problem needs and the object's properties would permit.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:functional_fixedness", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "functional_fixedness"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "functional_fixedness", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P077-C04-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent SSD adjudication confirms The exact record makes the mechanism representational and expressly names mass and surface area among the hidden load-bearing properties, satisfying a representation-plus-literal-feature DNF branch. The exact evidence and any single emitted qualifier jointly satisfy complete DNF branch (O1, O2, O3, O5, O7); no obligation was borrowed from a different branch."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Ornament or representation would obscure the load-bearing information in the medium, fabrication, mass, surface, or data mark.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P077-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a design whose literal object or system properties could be encountered directly.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A focal design mediates encounter with an object or system.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a directional process of change rather than a timeless classification alone.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The design is undergoing an ongoing drift.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the away-from-literal and toward-substitute direction.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The drift favors the selected substitute mode over direct encounter with the object or system itself.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires imitation as the substitute mode.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The design drifts toward imitation.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires skeuomorphism as the substitute mode.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The design drifts toward skeuomorphism.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires surface styling as the substitute mode.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The design drifts toward surface styling.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires symbolic storytelling as the substitute mode.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The design drifts toward symbolic storytelling.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A design is drifting toward imitation, skeuomorphism, styling, or symbolic narrative instead of direct material encounter.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A design is drifting toward one listed substitute mode instead of direct encounter with the artifact itself.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P077-C05-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Minimalism is the reduced literal design state, not the antecedent drift toward imitation.", "slug": "minimalism_in_art"}], "residual_id": "r:material_literalness_foregrounding:b039_a15_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b039_a15_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A design is drifting toward imitation, skeuomorphism, surface styling, or symbolic storytelling when the desired effect is direct encounter with the object or system itself. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A design is drifting toward imitation, skeuomorphism, surface styling, or symbolic storytelling when the desired effect is direct encounter with the object or system itself."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Minimalism is the reduced literal design state, not the antecedent drift toward imitation.", "slug": "minimalism_in_art"}], "normalized_requirement": "A design is drifting toward imitation, skeuomorphism, styling, or symbolic narrative instead of direct material encounter.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A design is drifting toward imitation, skeuomorphism, styling, or symbolic narrative instead of direct material encounter.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires texture to communicate material properties, quality, authenticity, haptic function, or perceptual depth.", "role_mapping": "Surface evidence -> texture; tactility or quality -> carried material information.", "slug": "texture", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b039_a15_c3a", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Trust, durability, repairability, tactility, provenance, or construction logic matters more than decorative polish. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Trust, durability, repairability, tactility, provenance, or construction logic matters more than decorative polish."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Texture", "one_liner": "The fine-grained surface variation beneath an object's gross form that carries perceptual, material, and emotional information rather than mere decoration.", "page_ref": "prime:texture", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Surface evidence -> texture; tactility or quality -> carried material information.", "slug": "texture", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires texture to communicate material properties, quality, authenticity, haptic function, or perceptual depth."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Surface or material evidence carries information about tactility, quality, authenticity, durability, or construction.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Texture can itself be decorative and does not entail this comparative priority.", "slug": "texture"}], "residual_id": "r:material_literalness_foregrounding:b039_a15_c3b", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b039_a15_c3b", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Trust, durability, repairability, tactility, provenance, or construction logic matters more than decorative polish. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Trust, durability, repairability, tactility, provenance, or construction logic matters more than decorative polish."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Texture can itself be decorative and does not entail this comparative priority.", "slug": "texture"}], "normalized_requirement": "Material trust, durability, repairability, tactility, provenance, or construction logic matters more than decorative polish.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Material trust, durability, repairability, tactility, provenance, or construction logic matters more than decorative polish.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P077-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O9"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O10"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve users and the same artifact whose literal and metaphorical interpretations are ordered.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Users interpret a focal artifact in the relevant domain.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the must-modality rather than optional attention.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Noticing the selected literal property is required.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the precedence order, not merely that both forms of interpretation occur.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Users must notice the selected literal property before projecting a metaphor.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires constraints as the literal property noticed first.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Users must first notice constraints.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires joints as the literal property noticed first.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Users must first notice joints.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires tolerances as the literal property noticed first.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "Users must first notice tolerances.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires weight as the literal property noticed first.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "Users must first notice weight.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires scale as the literal property noticed first.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "Users must first notice scale.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires data grain as the literal property noticed first.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "Users must first notice data grain.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires medium-specific affordances as the literal property noticed first.", "obligation_id": "O10", "statement": "Users must first notice medium-specific affordances.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Users must notice joints, tolerances, weight, scale, data grain, or medium-specific affordances before projecting metaphor.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Users must notice one listed literal constraint or affordance before projecting a metaphor onto the artifact.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P077-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Minimalism can foreground objecthood without an application gate requiring constraint inspection before metaphor.", "slug": "minimalism_in_art"}], "residual_id": "r:material_literalness_foregrounding:b039_a15_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b039_a15_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The domain needs users to notice constraints, joints, tolerances, weight, scale, data grain, or medium-specific affordances before projecting a metaphor onto the artifact. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The domain needs users to notice constraints, joints, tolerances, weight, scale, data grain, or medium-specific affordances before projecting a metaphor onto the artifact."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Minimalism can foreground objecthood without an application gate requiring constraint inspection before metaphor.", "slug": "minimalism_in_art"}], "normalized_requirement": "Users must notice joints, tolerances, weight, scale, data grain, or medium-specific affordances before projecting metaphor.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Users must notice joints, tolerances, weight, scale, data grain, or medium-specific affordances before projecting metaphor.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P077-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an artifact whose objecthood or medium-specific properties are available for interpretation.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A focal artifact has its own literal properties.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the representation-over-objecthood contrast.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The artifact is interpreted as representing something else rather than as a literal thing.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the convention as the cause of the misreading.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The selected existing convention causes that interpretive appearance.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a visual convention as the cause.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Existing visual conventions cause the misreading.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a narrative convention as the cause.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Existing narrative conventions cause the misreading.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Existing conventions make the artifact appear to represent something else rather than to be a literal thing with its own properties.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Existing visual or narrative conventions cause an artifact to seem representative of something else rather than literal with its own properties.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P077-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Minimalism rejects representation but does not require a pre-existing convention that currently causes the artifact to be misread.", "slug": "minimalism_in_art"}], "residual_id": "r:material_literalness_foregrounding:b039_a15_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b039_a15_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Existing visual or narrative conventions make the artifact seem like a representation of something else rather than a literal thing with its own properties. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Existing visual or narrative conventions make the artifact seem like a representation of something else rather than a literal thing with its own properties."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Minimalism rejects representation but does not require a pre-existing convention that currently causes the artifact to be misread.", "slug": "minimalism_in_art"}], "normalized_requirement": "Existing conventions make the artifact appear to represent something else rather than to be a literal thing with its own properties.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Existing conventions make the artifact appear to represent something else rather than to be a literal thing with its own properties.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 39, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-039", "ledger_sha256": "d3193996ed4801fb57ab3256da8053c3558c43ae0e9d3f18c6c559a8aa42e06d"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Meaning Reconstruction", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:meaning_reconstruction", "slug": "meaning_reconstruction"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a rupture between prior meaning and current action. The old frame may have been a founding mission, professional identity, learning identity, role expectation, narrative of progress, or inherited responsibility structure. Once that frame fails, action can become mechanical, cynical, directionless, or coercively reframed by others.\n\nA key danger is that the old meaning is either restored too quickly or discarded without replacing the responsibility it once organized. Another danger is that leaders impose a convenient new story, treating compliance as commitment.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A prior story, purpose, role, mission, or identity framework has stopped making action feel coherent, legitimate, or worthwhile, but the situation still requires practical commitment rather than indefinite reflection or imposed certainty."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P077-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O9"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O10"], ["O1", "O2", "O4", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O4", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O4", "O9"], ["O1", "O2", "O4", "O10"], ["O1", "O2", "O5", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O5", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O5", "O9"], ["O1", "O2", "O5", "O10"], ["O1", "O2", "O6", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O6", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O6", "O9"], ["O1", "O2", "O6", "O10"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve actual loss of credibility rather than merely contemplated revision.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The selected framework no longer feels credible.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the post-disruption order.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The credibility loss follows the selected disruption.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This framework branch requires a mission.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A mission is the framework that loses credibility.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This framework branch requires a role.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A role is the framework that loses credibility.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This framework branch requires a project.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "A project is the framework that loses credibility.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This framework branch requires a learning identity.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "A learning identity is the framework that loses credibility.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This disruption branch requires material change before the credibility loss.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "Change is the preceding disruption.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This disruption branch requires failure before the credibility loss.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "Failure is the preceding disruption.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This disruption branch requires crisis before the credibility loss.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "Crisis is the preceding disruption.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This disruption branch requires disillusionment before the credibility loss.", "obligation_id": "O10", "statement": "Disillusionment is the preceding disruption.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A mission, role, project, or learning identity loses credibility after change, failure, crisis, or disillusionment.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "One listed identity framework loses credibility after one listed disruption.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P077-C08-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A frame can change while the prior mission remains credible, and frame change is the transition rather than this loss state.", "slug": "frame_change"}], "residual_id": "r:meaning_reconstruction:b040_a01_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b040_a01_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A mission, role, project, or learning identity no longer feels credible after change, failure, crisis, or disillusionment. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A mission, role, project, or learning identity no longer feels credible after change, failure, crisis, or disillusionment."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A frame can change while the prior mission remains credible, and frame change is the transition rather than this loss state.", "slug": "frame_change"}], "normalized_requirement": "A mission, role, project, or learning identity loses credibility after change, failure, crisis, or disillusionment.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A mission, role, project, or learning identity loses credibility after change, failure, crisis, or disillusionment.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P077-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a collective actor and values inherited from an earlier setting.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A group holds or inherits a focal set of values.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve temporal or contextual change rather than a static value disagreement.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The group's operative conditions have changed from those under which the values were inherited.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve consequential changed circumstances rather than an immaterial variation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The change in conditions is material.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve continuing unresolved tension between these two poles.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The group remains caught between the inherited values and the changed conditions.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "A group remains caught between inherited values and conditions that have materially changed.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A group remains caught between inherited values and materially changed conditions.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P077-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Past-state contamination imports later information into a reconstruction; it does not describe inherited values that no longer fit present conditions.", "slug": "past_state_contamination"}], "residual_id": "r:meaning_reconstruction:b040_a01_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b040_a01_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A group is stuck between inherited values and changed conditions. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A group is stuck between inherited values and changed conditions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Past-state contamination imports later information into a reconstruction; it does not describe inherited values that no longer fit present conditions.", "slug": "past_state_contamination"}], "normalized_requirement": "A group remains caught between inherited values and conditions that have materially changed.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A group remains caught between inherited values and conditions that have materially changed.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P077-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve identity of the people and tasks across both relations without requiring that those people perform, own, or are responsible for the tasks.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The same people and focal tasks participate in both the enumeration and purpose-articulation relations.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve retained task-level knowledge rather than complete ignorance of the work.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Those people can enumerate the tasks.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve absence of purpose articulation, not merely disagreement about wording.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Those people cannot articulate why the tasks matter.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the within-actor contrast rather than unrelated task and purpose facts.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Task enumeration persists while purpose articulation is absent.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "People can enumerate tasks but cannot articulate why those tasks matter.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "People can enumerate focal tasks but cannot articulate why those tasks matter.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P077-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An open goal can remain active with a fully understood purpose; persistence does not entail loss of meaning.", "slug": "open_goal_persistence"}], "residual_id": "r:meaning_reconstruction:b040_a01_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b040_a01_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: People can list tasks but cannot explain why those tasks matter. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["People can list tasks but cannot explain why those tasks matter."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An open goal can remain active with a fully understood purpose; persistence does not entail loss of meaning.", "slug": "open_goal_persistence"}], "normalized_requirement": "People can enumerate tasks but cannot articulate why those tasks matter.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "People can enumerate tasks but cannot articulate why those tasks matter.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P077-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a change of role affecting the same actor whose uncertainty is at issue.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A focal actor undergoes a role transition.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve uncertainty over what the actor is responsible for.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The actor is uncertain about responsibility.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve uncertainty over who the actor is in the new role.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The actor is uncertain about identity.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve uncertainty over available or legitimate choices.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The actor is uncertain about choice.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the transition as the common cause rather than coincident uncertainties.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The role transition creates all three uncertainty dimensions.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "A role transition makes responsibility, identity, and choice simultaneously uncertain.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A role transition creates simultaneous uncertainty about responsibility, identity, and choice.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P077-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A role can be stable and unambiguous; the prime does not entail transition or identity uncertainty.", "slug": "role"}], "residual_id": "r:meaning_reconstruction:b040_a01_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b040_a01_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A role transition creates uncertainty about responsibility, identity, and choice. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A role transition creates uncertainty about responsibility, identity, and choice."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A role can be stable and unambiguous; the prime does not entail transition or identity uncertainty.", "slug": "role"}], "normalized_requirement": "A role transition makes responsibility, identity, and choice simultaneously uncertain.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A role transition makes responsibility, identity, and choice simultaneously uncertain.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A purpose conversation risks drifting into therapy, moralizing, or abstract introspection.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: A purpose conversation risks drifting into therapy, moralizing, or abstract introspection. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A purpose conversation risks drifting into therapy, moralizing, or abstract introspection."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "A purpose conversation risks drifting into therapy, moralizing, or abstract introspection."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 40, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-040", "ledger_sha256": "490f372c2ec12413ed77a3d6684f6b7585c4538a71b378c0960c4990dfa62daa"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Measurement-Protocol Standardization", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:measurement_protocol_standardization", "slug": "measurement_protocol_standardization"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Measurement procedures vary across groups, sites, raters, instruments, time points, or data systems, creating apparent differences that may be artifacts of how evidence was collected rather than effects of the treatment, condition, intervention, population, or phenomenon under study.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Measurement procedures vary across groups, sites, raters, instruments, time points, or data systems, creating apparent differences that may be artifacts of how evidence was collected rather than effects of the treatment, condition, intervention, population, or phenomenon under study."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The apparatus, observer, environment, and drift mechanisms necessarily contribute deviation between true and observed state.", "role_mapping": "Outcome -> observed state; instrument/rater/environment -> measurement apparatus and noise sources.", "slug": "measurement_uncertainty", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b040_a02_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The outcome depends on instruments, human raters, respondent interaction, collection timing, environmental conditions, or scoring rules. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The outcome depends on instruments, human raters, respondent interaction, collection timing, environmental conditions, or scoring rules."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Measurement Uncertainty and Observational Noise", "one_liner": "Measurement noise arises from instrument and observation limits.", "page_ref": "prime:measurement_uncertainty", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Outcome -> observed state; instrument/rater/environment -> measurement apparatus and noise sources.", "slug": "measurement_uncertainty", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The apparatus, observer, environment, and drift mechanisms necessarily contribute deviation between true and observed state."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Observed outcomes depend partly on instruments, raters, interactions, timing, environment, or scoring rules.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A fixed written specification is implemented through a separate interpretive practice that varies across cohorts and time.", "role_mapping": "Personnel or workflow -> interpretive practice; measurement protocol -> stated specification.", "slug": "instrument_interpretive_drift", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b040_a02_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Different personnel, equipment, languages, platforms, workflows, or locations could administer the measurement differently. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Different personnel, equipment, languages, platforms, workflows, or locations could administer the measurement differently."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Instrument Interpretive Drift", "one_liner": "A measurement instrument's interpretive practice silently shifts over time while its stated specification stays fixed, contaminating longitudinal trends.", "page_ref": "prime:instrument_interpretive_drift", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Personnel or workflow -> interpretive practice; measurement protocol -> stated specification.", "slug": "instrument_interpretive_drift", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A fixed written specification is implemented through a separate interpretive practice that varies across cohorts and time."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Different personnel, equipment, languages, platforms, workflows, or locations can apply the measurement differently.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Silent drift contaminates longitudinal trends while the formal instrument appears unchanged.", "role_mapping": "Apparent effect -> contaminated trend; procedural variation -> drifting interpretive practice.", "slug": "instrument_interpretive_drift", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "A silently moving yardstick keeps scores stable-looking while their meaning shifts, creating false differences or trends.", "role_mapping": "Measurement variation -> reference drift; real effect -> interpreted score change.", "slug": "reference_standard_decay", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "Apparatus and observational limits corrupt access to true state and can be misread as source variation.", "role_mapping": "Measurement error -> apparatus-induced deviation; real effect -> inferred true-state difference.", "slug": "measurement_uncertainty", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b040_a02_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Measurement error, rater effects, observer effects, instrument drift, or data-entry variation could be mistaken for a real effect. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Measurement error, rater effects, observer effects, instrument drift, or data-entry variation could be mistaken for a real effect."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Instrument Interpretive Drift", "one_liner": "A measurement instrument's interpretive practice silently shifts over time while its stated specification stays fixed, contaminating longitudinal trends.", "page_ref": "prime:instrument_interpretive_drift", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Apparent effect -> contaminated trend; procedural variation -> drifting interpretive practice.", "slug": "instrument_interpretive_drift", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Silent drift contaminates longitudinal trends while the formal instrument appears unchanged."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Reference Standard Decay", "one_liner": "A measuring apparatus keeps scoring against a reference standard that has silently drifted, so its numbers stay stable while their meaning shifts.", "page_ref": "prime:reference_standard_decay", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Measurement variation -> reference drift; real effect -> interpreted score change.", "slug": "reference_standard_decay", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A silently moving yardstick keeps scores stable-looking while their meaning shifts, creating false differences or trends."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Measurement Uncertainty and Observational Noise", "one_liner": "Measurement noise arises from instrument and observation limits.", "page_ref": "prime:measurement_uncertainty", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Measurement error -> apparatus-induced deviation; real effect -> inferred true-state difference.", "slug": "measurement_uncertainty", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Apparatus and observational limits corrupt access to true state and can be misread as source variation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Measurement, rater, observer, instrument, or entry variation can be mistaken for a real substantive effect.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P077-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve complexity in the procedures, sites, raters, instruments, or conditions of measurement.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The measurement setting has operational complexity.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve informal customary instruction rather than a fully specified protocol.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Measurement practice is governed only by informal usual-practice guidance.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve prospective insufficiency with respect to equivalence.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "That informal guidance will not preserve measurement equivalence.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve complexity as the reason usual-practice guidance cannot maintain equivalence.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Operational complexity makes the informal guidance insufficient.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Operational complexity makes informal usual-practice guidance insufficient to preserve measurement equivalence.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Operational complexity makes informal usual-practice guidance insufficient to preserve measurement equivalence.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P077-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A reference can decay in a simple, formally controlled process; operational complexity and informal guidance are not mandatory.", "slug": "reference_standard_decay"}], "residual_id": "r:measurement_protocol_standardization:b040_a02_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b040_a02_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: There is enough operational complexity that informal “measure it the usual way” guidance will not preserve equivalence. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["There is enough operational complexity that informal “measure it the usual way” guidance will not preserve equivalence."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A reference can decay in a simple, formally controlled process; operational complexity and informal guidance are not mandatory.", "slug": "reference_standard_decay"}], "normalized_requirement": "Operational complexity makes informal usual-practice guidance insufficient to preserve measurement equivalence.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Operational complexity makes informal usual-practice guidance insufficient to preserve measurement equivalence.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A study, test, audit, inspection, or experiment compares outcomes across groups, conditions, sites, raters, time periods, or systems.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Measurement procedures vary across groups, sites, raters, instruments, time points, or data systems, creating apparent differences that may be artifacts of how evidence was collected rather than effects of the treatment, condition, intervention, population, or phenomenon under study. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: A study, test, audit, inspection, or experiment compares outcomes across groups, conditions, sites, raters, time periods, or systems. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A study, test, audit, inspection, or experiment compares outcomes across groups, conditions, sites, raters, time periods, or systems.", "Measurement procedures vary across groups, sites, raters, instruments, time points, or data systems, creating apparent differences that may be artifacts of how evidence was collected rather than effects of the treatment, condition, intervention, population, or phenomenon under study."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "A study, test, audit, inspection, or experiment compares outcomes across groups, conditions, sites, raters, time periods, or systems."}, {"display_text": "The design needs causal, comparative, fairness, safety, regulatory, or high-stakes interpretability.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The design needs causal, comparative, fairness, safety, regulatory, or high-stakes interpretability. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The design needs causal, comparative, fairness, safety, regulatory, or high-stakes interpretability."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The design needs causal, comparative, fairness, safety, regulatory, or high-stakes interpretability."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 40, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-040", "ledger_sha256": "490f372c2ec12413ed77a3d6684f6b7585c4538a71b378c0960c4990dfa62daa"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Memory Palace Retrieval Indexing", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:memory_palace_retrieval_indexing", "slug": "memory_palace_retrieval_indexing"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is missing access structure. A learner may have encountered every item, but the sequence still fails because there is no reliable cue for where to start, what comes next, or how to recover after interruption. Lists, notes, and passive rereading often create familiarity without independent retrieval.\n\nThe tension is that stronger cues can help recall but can also create brittleness. A route that is too crowded, unfamiliar, vivid in the wrong way, or detached from meaning can make performance worse while still feeling clever.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A set of items, steps, ideas, or moves must be recalled in order, but unstructured rehearsal, passive review, or free recall does not provide a stable retrieval path. The learner may know pieces of the material yet omit, reorder, or fail to access them when needed."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact method is especially suited to discrete, listable, sequential content traversed in a stable order.", "role_mapping": "Items or steps -> installed images; order -> familiar route sequence.", "slug": "memory_palace_method_of_loci", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b040_a03_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The order of items, steps, arguments, cues, or categories matters for performance. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The order of items, steps, arguments, cues, or categories matters for performance."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Memory Palace (Method of Loci)", "one_liner": "Spatial mnemonic encoding via familiar locations.", "page_ref": "prime:memory_palace_method_of_loci", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Items or steps -> installed images; order -> familiar route sequence.", "slug": "memory_palace_method_of_loci", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact method is especially suited to discrete, listable, sequential content traversed in a stable order."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A finite set of items must be recalled in a performance-relevant order.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The method presupposes discrete listable material and supplies a stable spatial index where unstructured rehearsal is insufficient.", "role_mapping": "Finite material -> listable items; route -> familiar spatial schema.", "slug": "memory_palace_method_of_loci", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b040_a03_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The material is finite enough to be indexed into a route but complex enough that ordinary rehearsal is unreliable. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The material is finite enough to be indexed into a route but complex enough that ordinary rehearsal is unreliable."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Memory Palace (Method of Loci)", "one_liner": "Spatial mnemonic encoding via familiar locations.", "page_ref": "prime:memory_palace_method_of_loci", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Finite material -> listable items; route -> familiar spatial schema.", "slug": "memory_palace_method_of_loci", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The method presupposes discrete listable material and supplies a stable spatial index where unstructured rehearsal is insufficient."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The material is finite and route-indexable but complex enough that ordinary rehearsal is unreliable.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P077-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve ordered retrieval rather than recognition or unordered memory alone.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A subject attempts to recall a sequence of material or steps.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an actual recall defect rather than successful retrieval.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The sequenced recall attempt fails in the selected way.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a needed item or step to be omitted.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The recall failure is omission.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires recalled items or steps to be misordered.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The recall failure is an order error.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires loss of a transition between sequence elements.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The recall failure is a skipped transition.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires failure to recover the sequence position after interruption.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The recall failure is inability to restart after interruption.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Recall failures take the form of omission, order error, skipped transition, or inability to restart after interruption.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Recall failure takes one listed sequenced-retrieval form.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P077-C13-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The mnemonic may be adopted prospectively before any recurring recall error has occurred.", "slug": "memory_palace_method_of_loci"}], "residual_id": "r:memory_palace_retrieval_indexing:b040_a03_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b040_a03_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Recall errors involve omissions, order mistakes, skipped transitions, or difficulty restarting after interruption. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Recall errors involve omissions, order mistakes, skipped transitions, or difficulty restarting after interruption."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Changing delay or presentation rate can remove one limb, but a serial-position instance still requires position-dependent sequence recall rather than a non-memory judgment effect.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Serial-Position Effect", "one_liner": "The memory phenomenon in which items in a sequence are recalled in a U-shaped curve — high for the beginning (primacy, from extra rehearsal) and end (recency, from the transient buffer), sagging in the middle — with the two limbs mechanistically dissociable.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:serial_position_effect", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "serial_position_effect"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "serial_position_effect", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P077-C13-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent SSD adjudication confirms The exact record universally concerns recall tests on sequential lists and a lower middle-item recall rate, directly entailing the omission branch. The exact evidence and any single emitted qualifier jointly satisfy complete DNF branch (O1, O2, O3); no obligation was borrowed from a different branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A recency effect expressed only as heavier weighting in an integrated judgment would satisfy the candidate but not the recall-failure unit; the guard excludes it.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Recency Effect", "one_liner": "The empirical finding that the last items in a temporal sequence are recalled or weighted more heavily than middle items, driven by a short-term-store component and a temporal-distinctiveness component that a filled delay can separate.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:recency_effect", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1", "O2", "O3"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "recency_effect_in_sequence_recall_habitat", "predicate": "The recency effect is instantiated as sequence recall rather than as integrated judgment weighting.", "rationale": "Independent SSD review preserves subtype roles, relation direction, polarity or modality, and one complete DNF branch. The single qualifier is candidate-anchored, fills exactly the stated guardable gaps, and survives the post-qualifier counterexample test."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "recency_effect"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "recency_effect_in_sequence_recall_habitat"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "recency_effect", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P077-C13-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent SSD adjudication confirms The candidate's exact record already defines a temporal sequence and last-over-middle recall; one branch-selection qualifier restricts it to the recall habitat. The exact evidence and any single emitted qualifier jointly satisfy complete DNF branch (O1, O2, O3); no obligation was borrowed from a different branch."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Recall failures take the form of omission, order error, skipped transition, or inability to restart after interruption.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Vivid item-location association and systematic mental traversal are its mandatory encoding and retrieval mechanisms.", "role_mapping": "Concrete imagery -> vivid association; spatial structure -> palace; route traversal -> retrieval walk.", "slug": "memory_palace_method_of_loci", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b040_a03_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The learner benefits from concrete imagery, spatial structure, or route traversal more than from abstract lists alone. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The learner benefits from concrete imagery, spatial structure, or route traversal more than from abstract lists alone."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Memory Palace (Method of Loci)", "one_liner": "Spatial mnemonic encoding via familiar locations.", "page_ref": "prime:memory_palace_method_of_loci", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Concrete imagery -> vivid association; spatial structure -> palace; route traversal -> retrieval walk.", "slug": "memory_palace_method_of_loci", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Vivid item-location association and systematic mental traversal are its mandatory encoding and retrieval mechanisms."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Concrete imagery, spatial structure, or route traversal provides a stronger retrieval cue than an abstract list alone.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "External aids are unavailable, undesirable, or only supplementary at the moment of use.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this deployment constraint: External aids are unavailable, undesirable, or only supplementary at the moment of use. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["External aids are unavailable, undesirable, or only supplementary at the moment of use."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "External aids are unavailable, undesirable, or only supplementary at the moment of use."}, {"display_text": "The situation needs recall support but not necessarily a full understanding-building intervention.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The design must make recall easier without turning the cue system into a distraction, a brittle crutch, or a substitute for understanding. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: The situation needs recall support but not necessarily a full understanding-building intervention. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The situation needs recall support but not necessarily a full understanding-building intervention.", "The design must make recall easier without turning the cue system into a distraction, a brittle crutch, or a substitute for understanding."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The situation needs recall support but not necessarily a full understanding-building intervention."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 40, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-040", "ledger_sha256": "490f372c2ec12413ed77a3d6684f6b7585c4538a71b378c0960c4990dfa62daa"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Mental Model Mismatch Repair", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:mental_model_mismatch_repair", "slug": "mental_model_mismatch_repair"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a divergence between a predictive internal model and the system’s real behavior. The person’s model may be internally coherent, but it no longer fits the environment. Because action is organized around that model, ordinary reminders or more information often fail; the actor continues to anticipate the wrong state transition, exception, delay, consequence, or cue.\n\nThis mismatch can be hard to see because the person’s behavior may look careless from the outside. The archetype reframes the behavior as model-following. What matters is not only that an error occurred, but that the error reveals a specific prediction: “I thought it would save,” “I thought the scan filtered the list,” “I thought fallback was automatic,” or “I thought this forecast had already updated.”", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Users, operators, learners, or decision-makers take actions based on a mental model whose predictions diverge from actual system behavior, producing error, frustration, unsafe action, poor adoption, or repeated miscoordination."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "An active schema predicts an event and a salient incompatible realization crosses the mismatch threshold.", "role_mapping": "Mental prediction -> active schema; actual behavior -> realized event; failure -> registered violation.", "slug": "expectation_violation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b040_a04_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Prediction failure is observable. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Prediction failure is observable"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Expectation Violation", "one_liner": "An active prediction or schema specifies what should occur; an incompatible realization crosses a mismatch threshold and triggers surprise, reorientation, or repair, making the violated expectation diagnostically visible.", "page_ref": "prime:expectation_violation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Mental prediction -> active schema; actual behavior -> realized event; failure -> registered violation.", "slug": "expectation_violation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "An active schema predicts an event and a salient incompatible realization crosses the mismatch threshold."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "An active prediction about system behavior is observably violated by what occurs.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P077-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an actor, a predictive model, and divergence from the focal system's actual behavior.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A user or operator holds a prediction about system behavior that mismatches actual behavior.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve action alteration caused by the mismatch rather than a harmless incorrect belief.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The predictive mismatch changes the user's or operator's action.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the causal path through action to the consequence.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The mismatch-driven action change causes the selected adverse consequence.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires error as the consequence.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The adverse consequence is error.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires frustration as the consequence.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The adverse consequence is frustration.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires unsafe behavior as the consequence.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The adverse consequence is unsafe behavior.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires miscoordination as the consequence.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The adverse consequence is miscoordination.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "The prediction mismatch changes user or operator action and causes error, frustration, unsafe behavior, or miscoordination.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A predictive mismatch changes user or operator action and thereby causes one listed adverse consequence.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P077-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A mental model may accurately guide action; having one does not entail a consequential mismatch.", "slug": "mental_model"}], "residual_id": "r:mental_model_mismatch_repair:b040_a04_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b040_a04_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The mismatch affects action. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The mismatch affects action"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A harmless mode-tolerant mapping is a defence that prevents a consequential mode error; it is not a complete failure instance of the candidate.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Mode Error", "one_liner": "The interaction failure in which the same user action is interpreted differently by a system depending on a hidden mode the user does not perceive — the user acts correctly for the mode they believe is active, and the system, in the actually active mode, does something else.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:mode_error", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "mode_error"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "mode_error", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P077-C14-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent SSD adjudication confirms The candidate directly entails a believed-versus-actual system-behavior mismatch that governs the user's action and yields an error. The exact evidence and any single emitted qualifier jointly satisfy complete DNF branch (O1, O2, O3, O4); no obligation was borrowed from a different branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_SYNTHESIS", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Before the named consequential firing, a complete confirmation_fatigue state can exist without an actual adverse consequence. That counterexample fails the guard; once the named event occurs, the DSA's learned response causes error.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Confirmation Fatigue", "one_liner": "The interaction-design failure where a blocking confirmation prompt fires so often, and so rarely marks a truly consequential choice, that users develop an automatic dismiss reflex that discharges the prompt without reading it — leaving it syntactically present but informationally inert.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:confirmation_fatigue", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1", "O3", "O4"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "focal_prompt_is_rare_consequential_case", "predicate": "The focal prompt is the candidate's named rare consequential case.", "rationale": "Independent SSD review preserves subtype roles, relation direction, polarity or modality, and one complete DNF branch. The single qualifier is candidate-anchored, fills exactly the stated guardable gaps, and survives the post-qualifier counterexample test."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "confirmation_fatigue"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "focal_prompt_is_rare_consequential_case"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "confirmation_fatigue", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P077-C14-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent SSD adjudication confirms SSD retains the exact fatigue mechanism only under one named-event guard. The DSA supplies the prediction-shaped response change, and the guard selects its explicit residual case, completing the error DNF branch without importing another relation. The exact evidence and any single emitted qualifier jointly satisfy complete DNF branch (O1, O2, O3, O4); no obligation was borrowed from a different branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A polysemous label that no user acts on would not instantiate the candidate's required mismatched-decompression action failure.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Microcopy Ambiguity", "one_liner": "The HCI failure where a terse interface label admits more than one reading, so the user decompresses it against a prior different from the designer's and acts correctly on the wrong interpretation.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:microcopy_ambiguity", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "microcopy_ambiguity"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "microcopy_ambiguity", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P077-C14-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent SSD adjudication confirms The exact record requires a user to select a wrong interpretation and act correctly on it but incorrectly relative to system semantics, directly yielding the error branch. The exact evidence and any single emitted qualifier jointly satisfy complete DNF branch (O1, O2, O3, O4); no obligation was borrowed from a different branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_SYNTHESIS", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Before the named consequential firing, a complete alarm_fatigue state can exist without an actual adverse consequence. That counterexample fails the guard; once the named event occurs, the DSA's learned response causes unsafe behavior.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Alarm Fatigue", "one_liner": "Reframe an operator's habitual silencing of clinical alarms as the rational response to a warning channel whose predictive value has collapsed, relocating the fix from the operator's discipline to the channel's specificity.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:alarm_fatigue", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1", "O3", "O6"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "focal_firing_is_genuine_critical_alarm", "predicate": "The focal firing is the candidate's named genuine critical alarm.", "rationale": "Independent SSD review preserves subtype roles, relation direction, polarity or modality, and one complete DNF branch. The single qualifier is candidate-anchored, fills exactly the stated guardable gaps, and survives the post-qualifier counterexample test."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "alarm_fatigue"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "focal_firing_is_genuine_critical_alarm"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "alarm_fatigue", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P077-C14-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent SSD adjudication confirms SSD retains the exact fatigue mechanism only under one named-event guard. The DSA supplies the prediction-shaped response change, and the guard selects its explicit residual case, completing the unsafe behavior DNF branch without importing another relation. The exact evidence and any single emitted qualifier jointly satisfy complete DNF branch (O1, O2, O3, O6); no obligation was borrowed from a different branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A misleading-looking cue that is never read or clicked is excluded because the candidate requires cue uptake and misallocated click investment.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Information-Scent Failure", "one_liner": "Diagnose a navigation failure as the surface cues a user reads before clicking — link text, labels, snippets — failing to predict the destination's content, so the user invests a click on a wrong prediction and backtracks, hunts, or abandons.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:information_scent_failure", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "information_scent_failure"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "information_scent_failure", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P077-C14-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent SSD adjudication confirms The candidate directly entails the predictive mismatch, action it causes, and resulting click error or frustration. The exact evidence and any single emitted qualifier jointly satisfy complete DNF branch (O1, O2, O3, O4); no obligation was borrowed from a different branch."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The prediction mismatch changes user or operator action and causes error, frustration, unsafe behavior, or miscoordination.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P077-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the actor and the same prediction-generating model targeted by explanation.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An actor uses a focal predictive mental model.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve explanation as a repair attempt rather than unrelated communication.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Explanations are directed at correcting that predictive model.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve repeated explanation rather than one initial attempt.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The explanation attempt recurs.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve absence of lasting model repair, not only slow learning or temporary uncertainty.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The explanations fail to produce a durable correction in the predictive model.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Repeated explanations fail to produce a durable correction in the actor's predictive model.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Repeated explanations fail to produce durable correction in an actor's predictive model.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P077-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A mental model can be corrected by one explanation or require no correction at all.", "slug": "mental_model"}], "residual_id": "r:mental_model_mismatch_repair:b040_a04_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b040_a04_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Explanations are not sticking. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Explanations are not sticking"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A mental model can be corrected by one explanation or require no correction at all.", "slug": "mental_model"}], "normalized_requirement": "Repeated explanations fail to produce a durable correction in the actor's predictive model.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Repeated explanations fail to produce a durable correction in the actor's predictive model.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The system is learnable or alterable.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: The system is learnable or alterable. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The system is learnable or alterable"]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "The system is learnable or alterable"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 40, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-040", "ledger_sha256": "490f372c2ec12413ed77a3d6684f6b7585c4538a71b378c0960c4990dfa62daa"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Message-Mediated State Coordination", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:message_mediated_state_coordination", "slug": "message_mediated_state_coordination"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 6, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 6, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "6 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Several autonomous actors, services, components, teams, devices, or institutions must influence one another while retaining private state and local control. Without a governed message substrate they either share state unsafely, depend on direct inspection, make hidden side effects, lose context at boundaries, block while waiting for synchronous access, or create causal chains that cannot be observed or recovered after delay, failure, reordering, duplication, or partial execution.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Several autonomous actors, services, components, teams, devices, or institutions must influence one another while retaining private state and local control. Without a governed message substrate they either share state unsafely, depend on direct inspection, make hidden side effects, lose context at boundaries, block while waiting for synchronous access, or create causal chains that cannot be observed or recovered after delay, failure, reordering, duplication, or partial execution."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Autonomous holders of inaccessible private state and removal of shared memory are mandatory.", "role_mapping": "Participants -> state holders; private state -> inaccessible interior; direct mutation -> shared-memory interaction.", "slug": "message_passing", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b040_a05_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The archetype is strongest when encapsulation, autonomy, privacy, fault isolation, or institutional independence matters. In this condition set, the requirement is: Autonomous participants hold private state that peers should neither inspect nor mutate directly.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Participants own private state that other participants should not directly inspect or mutate."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Message Passing", "one_liner": "Autonomous holders of private state interact only through discrete addressed messages over intermediating channels.", "page_ref": "prime:message_passing", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Participants -> state holders; private state -> inaccessible interior; direct mutation -> shared-memory interaction.", "slug": "message_passing", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Autonomous holders of inaccessible private state and removal of shared memory are mandatory."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Autonomous participants hold private state that peers should neither inspect nor mutate directly.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Every inter-holder effect crosses the boundary as a discrete addressed message.", "role_mapping": "Coordination effect -> message; boundary -> private-state separation.", "slug": "message_passing", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b040_a05_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A sender needs to request, command, notify, query, delegate, synchronize, or signal without sharing its internal substrate. In this condition set, the requirement is: A coordination effect must cross the boundary between autonomous state holders.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Coordination effects must cross a boundary."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Message Passing", "one_liner": "Autonomous holders of private state interact only through discrete addressed messages over intermediating channels.", "page_ref": "prime:message_passing", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Coordination effect -> message; boundary -> private-state separation.", "slug": "message_passing", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Every inter-holder effect crosses the boundary as a discrete addressed message."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A coordination effect must cross the boundary between autonomous state holders.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Intermediating queues or buses absorb timing differences and asynchronously decouple sender and receiver.", "role_mapping": "Interaction -> messages; asynchronous variation -> channel timing and delivery behavior.", "slug": "message_passing", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b040_a05_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A message design must state what these conditions mean rather than letting them become accidental behavior. In this condition set, the requirement is: Interaction is mediated by channels that may delay, duplicate, reorder, drop, retry, or route messages asynchronously.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Interaction may be asynchronous, delayed, duplicated, reordered, dropped, retried, or routed through intermediaries."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Message Passing", "one_liner": "Autonomous holders of private state interact only through discrete addressed messages over intermediating channels.", "page_ref": "prime:message_passing", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Interaction -> messages; asynchronous variation -> channel timing and delivery behavior.", "slug": "message_passing", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Intermediating queues or buses absorb timing differences and asynchronously decouple sender and receiver."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Interaction is mediated by channels that may delay, duplicate, reorder, drop, retry, or route messages asynchronously.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A message is the sole external influence; private-state autonomy leaves processing and mutation at the receiver.", "role_mapping": "Receiver -> autonomous state holder; message effect -> receiver-local processing.", "slug": "message_passing", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b040_a05_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The receiving actor interprets and handles the message according to a contract, not by surrendering internal control to the sender. In this condition set, the requirement is: The receiver retains authority over how an incoming message changes its own state.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The receiver decides how a message affects its own state."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Message Passing", "one_liner": "Autonomous holders of private state interact only through discrete addressed messages over intermediating channels.", "page_ref": "prime:message_passing", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Receiver -> autonomous state holder; message effect -> receiver-local processing.", "slug": "message_passing", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A message is the sole external influence; private-state autonomy leaves processing and mutation at the receiver."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The receiver retains authority over how an incoming message changes its own state.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Explicit discretization makes every interaction addressable, observable, replayable, and auditable.", "role_mapping": "Interaction -> message unit; audit -> explicit message record.", "slug": "message_passing", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b040_a05_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Trace IDs, correlation IDs, receipt, handler outcome, and failure disposition matter when no shared memory explains what happened. In this condition set, the requirement is: The cross-boundary interaction must remain discrete, observable, replayable, and auditable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The same interaction must be auditable after crossing the boundary."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Message Passing", "one_liner": "Autonomous holders of private state interact only through discrete addressed messages over intermediating channels.", "page_ref": "prime:message_passing", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Interaction -> message unit; audit -> explicit message record.", "slug": "message_passing", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Explicit discretization makes every interaction addressable, observable, replayable, and auditable."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The cross-boundary interaction must remain discrete, observable, replayable, and auditable.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Every information-bearing medium has a hard reliable-throughput ceiling governed by bandwidth and noise.", "role_mapping": "Channel -> medium; load -> signaling rate; correctness -> below-capacity reliability.", "slug": "channel_capacity", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b040_a05_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Backpressure, queue limits, retry policy, and drop behavior determine whether the system fails safely or amplifies failure. In this condition set, the requirement is: Correctness depends on respecting a finite channel's reliable throughput ceiling.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Load and channel capacity can become part of correctness."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Channel Capacity", "one_liner": "Any information-bearing medium has a hard upper bound on reliable throughput that effort cannot exceed.", "page_ref": "prime:channel_capacity", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Channel -> medium; load -> signaling rate; correctness -> below-capacity reliability.", "slug": "channel_capacity", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Every information-bearing medium has a hard reliable-throughput ceiling governed by bandwidth and noise."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Correctness depends on respecting a finite channel's reliable throughput ceiling.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Authorization depends on message type, endpoint, sender, role, or context.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The channel must not become a privilege-escalation path around direct access control. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: Authorization depends on message type, endpoint, sender, role, or context. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Authorization depends on message type, endpoint, sender, role, or context.", "The channel must not become a privilege-escalation path around direct access control."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "Authorization depends on message type, endpoint, sender, role, or context."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 40, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-040", "ledger_sha256": "490f372c2ec12413ed77a3d6684f6b7585c4538a71b378c0960c4990dfa62daa"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Meta-Symbolic Rule Reflection", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:meta_symbolic_rule_reflection", "slug": "meta_symbolic_rule_reflection"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 6, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 7 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 7}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is that actors keep applying an inherited symbolic system even though the system is shaping the problem incorrectly. A framework that once compressed reality into usable distinctions now hides important variation, legitimizes unhelpful actions, or prevents people from expressing what they need to express.\n\nThe tension is unavoidable: shared symbols and rules make coordination possible, but they also make some things easier to see than others. This archetype preserves the usefulness of symbolic compression while making that compression reviewable and revisable.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Actors apply an existing symbolic system, classification, or rule set even though it may be shaping the problem incorrectly."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P078-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require repeated use of a pre-existing classification or symbolic category system.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Actors repeatedly apply an inherited category system.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail observed boundary failures or adverse results that bear on the adequacy of the same categories.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Edge cases, exceptions, or harms provide evidence that the categories are inadequate.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve continued application despite prior or ongoing evidence, not merely discovery followed by abandonment.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Use of the inherited system continues after the evidence of inadequacy appears.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the transition expressed by no longer adequate: a previously adequate or accepted category system has become inadequate.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The inherited categories have ceased to be adequate.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "Actors repeatedly apply an inherited category system whose categories have become inadequate, even after edge cases, exceptions, or harms show that inadequacy.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Repeated use of an inherited category system continues despite evidence that its formerly adequate or accepted categories are no longer adequate.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P078-C01-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Meta-symbolic reflection can examine a perfectly adequate formal system and does not entail harmful classifications.", "slug": "meta_symbolic_reflection"}], "residual_id": "r:meta_symbolic_rule_reflection:b040_a06_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b040_a06_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Actors repeatedly classify, evaluate, route, or reason through an inherited category system even though edge cases, exceptions, or harms show that the categories are no longer adequate. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Actors repeatedly classify, evaluate, route, or reason through an inherited category system even though edge cases, exceptions, or harms show that the categories are no longer adequate."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Meta-symbolic reflection can examine a perfectly adequate formal system and does not entail harmful classifications.", "slug": "meta_symbolic_reflection"}], "normalized_requirement": "An inherited category system repeatedly produces harmful or inadequate classifications at edge cases.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "An inherited category system repeatedly produces harmful or inadequate classifications at edge cases.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P078-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail procedural or formal compliance with the focal rule set, not a violation or implementation error.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A rule set is followed correctly.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must make the compliant rule application generate the outcome, not merely coexist with it.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Correct application of the rule set produces the focal outcome.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve the appearance or assessment of arbitrariness as the adverse result of correct rule following; objective establishment is not required.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The resulting outcome seems arbitrary.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve the appearance or assessment of brittleness as the adverse result of correct rule following; objective establishment is not required.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The resulting outcome seems brittle.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve the appearance or assessment of obsolescence as the adverse result of correct rule following; objective establishment is not required.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The resulting outcome seems outdated.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve the appearance or assessment of illegibility as the adverse result of correct rule following; objective establishment is not required.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The resulting outcome seems illegible.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve the appearance or assessment of unfairness as the adverse result of correct rule following; objective establishment is not required.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The resulting outcome seems unfair.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve the appearance or assessment that the outcome is disconnected from the rule's purpose; objective establishment is not required.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The resulting outcome seems disconnected from the purpose the rule was meant to serve.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A rule set is followed correctly yet produces an outcome that seems arbitrary, brittle, outdated, illegible, unfair, or disconnected from the purpose the rule was meant to serve.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Correct rule following produces an outcome that appears to have one listed adverse or purpose-misaligned property.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P078-C02-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A formal system can generate coherent, current, purpose-aligned results.", "slug": "formal_system"}], "residual_id": "r:meta_symbolic_rule_reflection:b040_a06_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b040_a06_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A rule set is being followed correctly but produces outcomes that seem arbitrary, brittle, outdated, illegible, unfair, or disconnected from the purpose the rule was meant to serve. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A rule set is being followed correctly but produces outcomes that seem arbitrary, brittle, outdated, illegible, unfair, or disconnected from the purpose the rule was meant to serve."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A formal system can generate coherent, current, purpose-aligned results.", "slug": "formal_system"}], "normalized_requirement": "A correctly followed rule set produces brittle, arbitrary, outdated, illegible, unfair, or purpose-disconnected outcomes.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A correctly followed rule set produces brittle, arbitrary, outdated, illegible, unfair, or purpose-disconnected outcomes.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P078-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an actor using a vocabulary, notation, schema, or primitive inventory for expression or modeling.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "People use a representational system to express a decision-relevant distinction.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail that the inventory lacks the distinction, not merely that users have not selected an available term.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The required distinction is absent from that representational system.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve absence from the system as the reason the distinction cannot be expressed.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The inventory gap prevents expression of the distinction.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve vocabulary as the inventory lacking the distinction.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The deficient representational system is a vocabulary.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve notation as the inventory lacking the distinction.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The deficient representational system is a notation.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve schema as the inventory lacking the distinction.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The deficient representational system is a schema.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve model primitives as the inventory lacking the distinction.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The deficient representational system is a set of model primitives.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "People cannot express an important distinction because their vocabulary, notation, schema, or model primitives do not contain it.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A representational system cannot express a decision-relevant distinction because that distinction is absent from its inventory.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P078-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Reflection on a symbol system does not require that its vocabulary lacks an important distinction.", "slug": "meta_symbolic_reflection"}], "residual_id": "r:meta_symbolic_rule_reflection:b040_a06_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b040_a06_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: People cannot express an important distinction because the available vocabulary, notation, schema, or model primitives do not contain it. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["People cannot express an important distinction because the available vocabulary, notation, schema, or model primitives do not contain it."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A codebase with domain-specific value types would express and enforce the distinctions and would therefore fall outside primitive obsession.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Primitive Obsession", "one_liner": "The code smell of representing domain concepts that carry structural commitments — units, valid ranges, well-formedness, identity — as bare primitives like int or string, so the type system cannot enforce the distinctions and they survive only as validation duplicated at every callsite.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:primitive_obsession", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "primitive_obsession"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "primitive_obsession", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P078-C03-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record explicitly says bare model primitives flatten domain distinctions out of the representation so the type system cannot distinguish or enforce them."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The available vocabulary, notation, schema, or primitives cannot express a decision-relevant distinction.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P078-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve multiple participants using the same framework as the setting of disagreement.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Participants reason or debate inside a shared symbolic framework.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail non-explication of assumptions belonging to the framework, not merely disagreement about explicit assumptions.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Load-bearing assumptions of the framework remain unnamed.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the omission as explanatory of continued disagreement.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The unnamed assumptions cause or sustain the disagreement.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail continuation rather than a single initial difference of opinion.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The disagreement persists over time.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "Disagreement persists because participants debate inside a symbolic framework whose assumptions are never named.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Unnamed assumptions of a shared symbolic framework sustain disagreement among its users.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P078-C04-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Meta-symbolic reflection can occur without disagreement and with explicit assumptions.", "slug": "meta_symbolic_reflection"}], "residual_id": "r:meta_symbolic_rule_reflection:b040_a06_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b040_a06_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Disagreements persist because participants debate inside a symbolic framework whose assumptions are never named. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Disagreements persist because participants debate inside a symbolic framework whose assumptions are never named."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Meta-symbolic reflection can occur without disagreement and with explicit assumptions.", "slug": "meta_symbolic_reflection"}], "normalized_requirement": "Disagreement persists because participants reason inside a symbolic framework whose assumptions remain unnamed.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Disagreement persists because participants reason inside a symbolic framework whose assumptions remain unnamed.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P078-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O9"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O10"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail that downstream choices, routing, evaluation, or governance depend on the focal symbolic system.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The selected symbolic category system controls downstream decisions.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a representation-to-reality mismatch, not merely disagreement about categories.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The symbolic system diverges from the reality it is used to represent.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail actual temporal drift, not a system that was wrong from inception or a merely possible future mismatch.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The divergence has begun or is increasing over time.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve taxonomy as the drifting symbolic system.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The decision-controlling system is a taxonomy.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve ontology as the drifting symbolic system.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The decision-controlling system is an ontology.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve rubric as the drifting symbolic system.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The decision-controlling system is a rubric.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve a model class as the drifting symbolic system.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The decision-controlling system is a model class.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve a policy definition as the drifting symbolic system.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The decision-controlling system is a policy definition.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve workflow state as the drifting symbolic system.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "The decision-controlling system is a workflow state.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve a governance category as the drifting symbolic system.", "obligation_id": "O10", "statement": "The decision-controlling system is a governance category.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A taxonomy, ontology, rubric, model class, policy definition, workflow state, or governance category controls downstream decisions and has begun to drift from reality.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A decision-controlling symbolic category system begins to diverge from the reality it represents.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P078-C05-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Procedure-work mismatch requires prescribed and enacted work layers, not every taxonomy or ontology drift.", "slug": "procedure_work_mismatch"}], "residual_id": "r:meta_symbolic_rule_reflection:b040_a06_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b040_a06_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A taxonomy, ontology, rubric, model class, policy definition, workflow state, or governance category controls downstream decisions and has started to drift from reality. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A taxonomy, ontology, rubric, model class, policy definition, workflow state, or governance category controls downstream decisions and has started to drift from reality."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Procedure-work mismatch requires prescribed and enacted work layers, not every taxonomy or ontology drift.", "slug": "procedure_work_mismatch"}], "normalized_requirement": "A decision-controlling taxonomy, ontology, rubric, model class, or policy definition has drifted from reality.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A decision-controlling taxonomy, ontology, rubric, model class, or policy definition has drifted from reality.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P078-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the focal object as a classification, rule, schema, or comparable symbolic framework.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The focal object is one symbolic framework.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require accumulated patches in the focal framework.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The framework has accumulated patches.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require accumulated exceptions in the focal framework.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The framework has accumulated exceptions.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require accumulated workarounds in the focal framework.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The framework has accumulated workarounds.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require accumulated miscellaneous or catch-all buckets in the focal framework.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The framework has accumulated miscellaneous buckets.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail that the cumulative compensation pattern signals an underlying representational or symbolic misfit, not merely routine extension.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The complete accumulation signals a deeper symbolic mismatch.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Patches, exceptions, workarounds, and miscellaneous buckets accumulate around a framework and signal a deeper symbolic mismatch.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A framework's accumulated patches, exceptions, workarounds, and miscellaneous buckets jointly signal an underlying symbolic mismatch.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P078-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A symbol system can be reflected on before any patches or exceptions accumulate.", "slug": "meta_symbolic_reflection"}], "residual_id": "r:meta_symbolic_rule_reflection:b040_a06_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b040_a06_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The framework has accumulated patches, exceptions, workarounds, and miscellaneous buckets that signal a deeper symbolic mismatch. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The framework has accumulated patches, exceptions, workarounds, and miscellaneous buckets that signal a deeper symbolic mismatch."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A symbol system can be reflected on before any patches or exceptions accumulate.", "slug": "meta_symbolic_reflection"}], "normalized_requirement": "Patches, exceptions, workarounds, and miscellaneous buckets accumulate around a deeper symbolic mismatch.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Patches, exceptions, workarounds, and miscellaneous buckets accumulate around a deeper symbolic mismatch.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The reflective operation is a response and does not itself entail recurrent distortion from the object-level system.", "slug": "meta_symbolic_reflection"}], "residual_id": "r:meta_symbolic_rule_reflection:b040_a06_c7", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b040_a06_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Changing an individual decision would not solve the problem because the same symbolic or rule structure will keep recreating the distortion. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Changing an individual decision would not solve the problem because the same symbolic or rule structure will keep recreating the distortion."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The reflective operation is a response and does not itself entail recurrent distortion from the object-level system.", "slug": "meta_symbolic_reflection"}], "normalized_requirement": "Changing one decision cannot stop the same symbolic structure from recreating the distortion.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Changing one decision cannot stop the same symbolic structure from recreating the distortion.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 40, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-040", "ledger_sha256": "490f372c2ec12413ed77a3d6684f6b7585c4538a71b378c0960c4990dfa62daa"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Metacognitive Monitoring Loop", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:metacognitive_monitoring_loop", "slug": "metacognitive_monitoring_loop"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is that object-level reasoning can monopolize attention. A person or group may keep debating the answer, running the same test, rereading the same material, or defending the same option while the reasoning process itself is failing. The failure can look like overconfidence, underconfidence, overload, fixation, circular reasoning, premature closure, shallow search, or a strategy that no longer fits the task.\n\nThe hard part is proportionality. Too little monitoring lets errors harden into conclusions. Too much monitoring creates introspective load, interruption, or rumination.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "The thinker or group focuses only on object-level content while the reasoning process itself may be overloaded, miscalibrated, biased, stuck, or using the wrong strategy."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Metacognition can monitor a simple task whose initial strategy is appropriate.", "slug": "metacognition"}], "residual_id": "r:metacognitive_monitoring_loop:b040_a07_c1", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b040_a07_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A problem is complex enough that the first reasoning strategy may not fit the task. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A problem is complex enough that the first reasoning strategy may not fit the task."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Metacognition can monitor a simple task whose initial strategy is appropriate.", "slug": "metacognition"}], "normalized_requirement": "Problem complexity makes the first reasoning strategy potentially mismatched to the task.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Problem complexity makes the first reasoning strategy potentially mismatched to the task.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Metacognition requires monitoring signals but not that confidence, load, or failure changes over the interval.", "slug": "metacognition"}], "residual_id": "r:metacognitive_monitoring_loop:b040_a07_c2", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b040_a07_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Confidence, confusion, cognitive load, or repeated failed attempts are changing during the work. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Confidence, confusion, cognitive load, or repeated failed attempts are changing during the work."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Metacognition requires monitoring signals but not that confidence, load, or failure changes over the interval.", "slug": "metacognition"}], "normalized_requirement": "Confidence, confusion, cognitive load, or repeated failure changes during the work.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Confidence, confusion, cognitive load, or repeated failure changes during the work.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Metacognition also occurs in familiar and determinate tasks.", "slug": "metacognition"}], "residual_id": "r:metacognitive_monitoring_loop:b040_a07_c5", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b040_a07_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The work involves uncertainty, ambiguous evidence, competing hypotheses, or unfamiliar problem structure. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The work involves uncertainty, ambiguous evidence, competing hypotheses, or unfamiliar problem structure."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Metacognition also occurs in familiar and determinate tasks.", "slug": "metacognition"}], "normalized_requirement": "The work contains uncertainty, ambiguous evidence, competing hypotheses, or unfamiliar structure.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The work contains uncertainty, ambiguous evidence, competing hypotheses, or unfamiliar structure.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The cost of a reasoning error is high enough that process drift should be caught before commitment.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Object-level reasoning consumes attention, but the quality of that reasoning depends on a process that also needs attention, feedback, and regulation. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The cost of a reasoning error is high enough that process drift should be caught before commitment. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The cost of a reasoning error is high enough that process drift should be caught before commitment.", "Object-level reasoning consumes attention, but the quality of that reasoning depends on a process that also needs attention, feedback, and regulation."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "The cost of a reasoning error is high enough that process drift should be caught before commitment."}, {"display_text": "A learner or team must improve not only the current answer but also future strategy selection.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: A learner or team must improve not only the current answer but also future strategy selection. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A learner or team must improve not only the current answer but also future strategy selection."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "A learner or team must improve not only the current answer but also future strategy selection."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 40, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-040", "ledger_sha256": "490f372c2ec12413ed77a3d6684f6b7585c4538a71b378c0960c4990dfa62daa"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Metanarrative Coherence and Internal Consistency Check", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:metanarrative_coherence_and_internal_consistency_check", "slug": "metanarrative_coherence_and_internal_consistency_check"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Broad narratives can hide contradictions because their claims are distributed across episodes, examples, values, causal links, and exceptions. A narrative may use the same term in multiple ways, treat anomalies inconsistently, claim causal necessity in one place and contingency in another, or use local evidence to support a global conclusion. Without a structured check, persuasive fluency substitutes for validation.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A comprehensive narrative is being used to explain events, justify decisions, stabilize identity, or organize interpretation, but its claims may conflict across levels, periods, exceptions, sources, or implied conclusions. Without an explicit coherence check, contradictions can remain hidden inside persuasive language."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A comprehensive single trajectory imposes one plot-logic across a domain too large for that coherence to be evidentially secure.", "role_mapping": "Sweeping story -> metanarrative; anomalies -> local variation; smooth explanation -> unifying trajectory.", "slug": "grand_narrative_metanarrative", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b040_a08_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A story explains too much too smoothly and absorbs anomalies without visible criteria. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A story explains too much too smoothly and absorbs anomalies without visible criteria."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Grand Narrative (Metanarrative)", "one_liner": "Overarching explanations.", "page_ref": "prime:grand_narrative_metanarrative", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Sweeping story -> metanarrative; anomalies -> local variation; smooth explanation -> unifying trajectory.", "slug": "grand_narrative_metanarrative", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A comprehensive single trajectory imposes one plot-logic across a domain too large for that coherence to be evidentially secure."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A totalizing story subsumes anomalies and local variation under an unusually smooth overarching explanation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P078-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve multiple claims within one narrative rather than claims from unrelated narratives.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "At least two claims belong to different parts of the same narrative.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail logical, causal, temporal, normative, or role incompatibility, not mere difference in emphasis.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The claims jointly imply incompatible accounts.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve incompatible causal explanations.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The incompatible implications concern causal accounts.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve incompatible temporal accounts.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The incompatible implications concern timelines.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve incompatible normative commitments.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The incompatible implications concern values.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve incompatible assignments or descriptions of actor roles.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The incompatible implications concern actor roles.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Different parts of a narrative imply incompatible causal accounts, timelines, values, or actor roles.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Claims within one narrative imply incompatible accounts on one listed dimension.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P078-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A metanarrative may be internally consistent even when totalizing or empirically false.", "slug": "grand_narrative_metanarrative"}], "residual_id": "r:metanarrative_coherence_and_internal_consistency_check:b040_a08_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b040_a08_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Different parts of the narrative imply incompatible causal accounts, timelines, values, or actor roles. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Different parts of the narrative imply incompatible causal accounts, timelines, values, or actor roles."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A metanarrative may be internally consistent even when totalizing or empirically false.", "slug": "grand_narrative_metanarrative"}], "normalized_requirement": "Different narrative claims imply incompatible causal accounts, timelines, values, or actor roles.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Different narrative claims imply incompatible causal accounts, timelines, values, or actor roles.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P078-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve one continuing narrative as the object being altered.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A focal narrative persists across time.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail multiple or cumulative modifications.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Alterations accumulate rather than occurring as one isolated change.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve temporal buildup.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The accumulation occurs over time.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve accumulated revisions.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The accumulated alterations are revisions.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve accumulated exceptions.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The accumulated alterations are exceptions.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve accumulated rhetorical substitutions.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The accumulated alterations are rhetorical substitutions.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A narrative accumulates revisions, exceptions, or rhetorical substitutions over time.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A narrative accumulates one listed form of alteration over time.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P078-C08-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A newly formed metanarrative need not have accumulated revisions or exceptions.", "slug": "grand_narrative_metanarrative"}], "residual_id": "r:metanarrative_coherence_and_internal_consistency_check:b040_a08_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b040_a08_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The narrative has accumulated revisions, exceptions, or rhetorical substitutions over time. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The narrative has accumulated revisions, exceptions, or rhetorical substitutions over time."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Once the exact record's laundered statement is fixed as the focal narrative, each successive venue strips material from that same statement, so cumulative revision over time cannot be falsified while preserving the candidate and guard.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Quote Laundering", "one_liner": "A provisional but accurate statement is cited across successive venues that each strip its caveats and scope, until it circulates as authoritative settled fact — a channel failure, not a false source, so it resists source correction and needs traceability instead.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:quote_laundering", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "laundered_statement_is_narrative", "predicate": "The provisional statement being laundered is the focal narrative.", "rationale": "The persistent statement, successive transmission stages, and cumulative caveat stripping supply the revision spine; the one role-type restriction to a narrative is atomic and anchored."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "quote_laundering"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The provisional statement being laundered is the focal narrative."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "quote_laundering", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P078-C08-U1", "why_it_fits": "Quote laundering supplies cumulative, successive revision of a persistent statement; one atomic domain restriction identifies that existing statement role as the focal narrative."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The narrative accumulates revisions, exceptions, or rhetorical substitutions over time.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P078-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve critics or reviewers contesting internal consistency of the same narrative.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Multiple critics make contradiction claims about a focal narrative.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail absence of a common traceable evaluation framework, not merely disagreement within an existing one.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "No shared auditable claim structure exists for evaluating those contradiction claims.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the evaluation impasse as arising from the missing audit structure.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The absent shared structure prevents common judgment of the contradiction claims.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Critics identify contradictions in a narrative but lack a shared audit structure for judging them.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Contradiction claims about a narrative cannot be jointly adjudicated because critics lack a shared audit structure.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P078-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Consistency is a property or test and does not entail critics, disagreement, or absent audit structure.", "slug": "consistency"}], "residual_id": "r:metanarrative_coherence_and_internal_consistency_check:b040_a08_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b040_a08_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Critics point to contradictions but no shared audit structure exists for judging them. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Critics point to contradictions but no shared audit structure exists for judging them."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Consistency is a property or test and does not entail critics, disagreement, or absent audit structure.", "slug": "consistency"}], "normalized_requirement": "Critics identify contradictions but lack a shared auditable claim structure for judging them.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Critics identify contradictions but lack a shared auditable claim structure for judging them.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P078-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the full problem-to-cause-to-action-to-outcome chain.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The focal account links a problem, proposed cause, action, and expected outcome.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve load-bearing linking assumptions rather than unrelated background beliefs.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The account contains assumptions that support links in that chain.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail absence of explicit validation, not validation that produced an unfavorable result.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Those assumptions have not been explicitly validated.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve a theory of change as the account.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The causal account is a theory of change.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve an institutional story as the account.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The causal account is an institutional story.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A theory of change or institutional story links problem, cause, action, and outcome while its linking assumptions remain explicitly unvalidated.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A causal institutional account links problem to outcome through action while leaving its assumptions unvalidated.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P078-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A metanarrative need not contain an explicit theory of change, and its assumptions may have been tested.", "slug": "grand_narrative_metanarrative"}], "residual_id": "r:metanarrative_coherence_and_internal_consistency_check:b040_a08_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b040_a08_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A theory of change or institutional story links problem, cause, action, and outcome but its assumptions are not explicitly validated. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A theory of change or institutional story links problem, cause, action, and outcome but its assumptions are not explicitly validated."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A metanarrative need not contain an explicit theory of change, and its assumptions may have been tested.", "slug": "grand_narrative_metanarrative"}], "normalized_requirement": "A theory of change links problem, cause, action, and outcome while leaving its assumptions unvalidated.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A theory of change links problem, cause, action, and outcome while leaving its assumptions unvalidated.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A narrative is used to justify strategy, legitimacy, policy, identity, or evaluation decisions.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A comprehensive narrative is being used to explain events, justify decisions, stabilize identity, or organize interpretation, but its claims may conflict across levels, periods, exceptions, sources, or implied conclusions. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: A narrative is used to justify strategy, legitimacy, policy, identity, or evaluation decisions. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A narrative is used to justify strategy, legitimacy, policy, identity, or evaluation decisions.", "A comprehensive narrative is being used to explain events, justify decisions, stabilize identity, or organize interpretation, but its claims may conflict across levels, periods, exceptions, sources, or implied conclusions."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "A narrative is used to justify strategy, legitimacy, policy, identity, or evaluation decisions."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 40, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-040", "ledger_sha256": "490f372c2ec12413ed77a3d6684f6b7585c4538a71b378c0960c4990dfa62daa"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Metaphor Mapping and Interpretive Control", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:metaphor_mapping_and_interpretive_control", "slug": "metaphor_mapping_and_interpretive_control"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 2, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Metaphors organize attention and inference. Calling an organization a machine foregrounds parts, control, and repair while backgrounding informal adaptation, meaning, conflict, and care. Calling illness a battle assigns enemies, winners, defeat, courage, and weapon-like treatment. Calling data oil imports extraction, ownership, scarcity, refinement, and profit while obscuring consent, copying, and relational context.\n\nThe hidden problem is selective projection without visible selection. Audiences may transfer relations the author never intended or miss intended relations because their source knowledge differs. Culture, language, profession, disability, identity, and lived position change which entailments feel obvious. Repetition sediments the metaphor into metrics, software, budgets, and policy after its original explanatory limits disappear.\n\nMetaphors also distribute power: they assign agent and patient roles, define threats and remedies, naturalize institutions, and make alternatives seem irrational. The central tension is vivid compression versus bounded truth.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A target is difficult to understand, imagine, remember, or discuss, so a source-domain frame is introduced; audiences then transfer more, less, or different structure than intended."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Metaphor maps selected structure from a familiar source domain into an abstract or unfamiliar target without claiming identity.", "role_mapping": "Familiar model -> source domain; abstract target -> target domain.", "slug": "metaphor", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b040_a09_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: An abstract or unfamiliar target needs a model. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["An abstract or unfamiliar target needs a model"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Metaphor", "one_liner": "Conceptual mapping.", "page_ref": "prime:metaphor", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Familiar model -> source domain; abstract target -> target domain.", "slug": "metaphor", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Metaphor maps selected structure from a familiar source domain into an abstract or unfamiliar target without claiming identity."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "An abstract or unfamiliar target is approached through a model projected from a familiar source domain.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P078-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a linguistic or symbolic description applied to a focal target.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A target domain is described through existing language.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail that the language causes or sustains non-visibility of the feature.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The existing language conceals rather than reveals a feature of that target.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve hidden target relations.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The concealed feature is a relationship within the target.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve an action possibility hidden by the language.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The concealed feature is an available action.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Existing language conceals relationships in the target or actions available within it.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Existing language conceals either target relations or available action.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P078-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A metaphor can be introduced for vividness or memory even when existing language hides nothing.", "slug": "metaphor"}], "residual_id": "r:metaphor_mapping_and_interpretive_control:b040_a09_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b040_a09_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Existing language hides relationships or action. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Existing language hides relationships or action"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Neutral property-based description exposes the novel affordance and therefore removes the concealment relation central to functional fixedness.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Functional Fixedness", "one_liner": "The cognitive bias in which encoding an object under its conventional category label crowds out inspection of its raw physical properties, blocking the solver from a non-conventional use the problem needs and the object's properties would permit.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:functional_fixedness", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "functional_fixedness"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "functional_fixedness", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P078-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record expressly makes a conventional label crowd out raw properties and block retrieval of a non-conventional but available use."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Existing language conceals target relations or available action.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Most metaphors are not decision-consequential.", "slug": "metaphor"}], "residual_id": "r:metaphor_mapping_and_interpretive_control:b040_a09_c3", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b040_a09_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A metaphor already shapes consequential decisions. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A metaphor already shapes consequential decisions"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Most metaphors are not decision-consequential.", "slug": "metaphor"}], "normalized_requirement": "A metaphor already shapes a consequential decision.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A metaphor already shapes a consequential decision.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P078-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve distinct audiences receiving one common figurative mapping.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "At least two audiences encounter the same metaphor.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve interpretation as an audience response to the same metaphor.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The audiences infer different meanings from that metaphor.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail incompatible or mutually undermining interpretations.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The inferred meanings conflict rather than merely differ in emphasis.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Different audiences infer conflicting meanings from the same metaphor.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "The same metaphor produces conflicting interpretations across audiences.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P078-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A metaphor can be interpreted consistently by all audiences.", "slug": "metaphor"}], "residual_id": "r:metaphor_mapping_and_interpretive_control:b040_a09_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b040_a09_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Different audiences infer conflicting meanings. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Different audiences infer conflicting meanings"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A metaphor can be interpreted consistently by all audiences.", "slug": "metaphor"}], "normalized_requirement": "Different audiences draw conflicting inferences from the same metaphor.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Different audiences draw conflicting inferences from the same metaphor.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P078-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve one focal target with a dominant metaphor and at least one competing frame.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A metaphor and alternative frames apply to the same target.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail elevated framing control rather than mere coexistence.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The metaphor becomes dominant in interpretation or discourse.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve crowding out caused by the dominant metaphor.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The metaphor's dominance suppresses or displaces the alternative frames.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "A dominant metaphor crowds out alternative frames for the same target.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A dominant metaphor suppresses alternative ways of framing its target.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P078-C13-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A metaphor can coexist with many alternative frames and need not be dominant.", "slug": "metaphor"}], "residual_id": "r:metaphor_mapping_and_interpretive_control:b040_a09_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b040_a09_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A dominant metaphor crowds out alternative frames. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A dominant metaphor crowds out alternative frames"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_GUARDED_EQUIVALENT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "With the existing category label fixed as a metaphor for the same object, the exact candidate's defining crowd-out necessarily makes that metaphor dominant and suppresses the alternative property and affordance frames.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Functional Fixedness", "one_liner": "The cognitive bias in which encoding an object under its conventional category label crowds out inspection of its raw physical properties, blocking the solver from a non-conventional use the problem needs and the object's properties would permit.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:functional_fixedness", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "category_label_is_target_metaphor", "predicate": "The conventional category label is a metaphor applied to the focal object.", "rationale": "The two guards are semantically equivalent domain restrictions on the same category-label role; either makes the exact dominance-and-crowding relation a metaphor case without laundering."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "functional_fixedness"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The conventional category label is a metaphor applied to the focal object."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "functional_fixedness", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P078-C13-U1", "why_it_fits": "Functional fixedness supplies the dominance-and-displacement spine; one atomic domain restriction types its already-present category label as the target metaphor."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A dominant metaphor suppresses alternative frames.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 40, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-040", "ledger_sha256": "490f372c2ec12413ed77a3d6684f6b7585c4538a71b378c0960c4990dfa62daa"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Metasystem Integration", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:metasystem_integration", "slug": "metasystem_integration"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is cross-system fragmentation. Each participating system may be locally coherent, but the collection lacks a higher-level layer that can see and manage the interactions among them. The important failure appears between systems: at handoffs, interfaces, standards, jurisdictions, incentives, escalation paths, shared risks, user journeys, or resource dependencies.\n\nThis creates a paradox. Local autonomy is often necessary because each system has its own expertise, context, mandate, and operating constraints. But unmanaged autonomy can produce duplicated effort, incompatible rules, hidden dependencies, coordination delays, and cascading failure. Metasystem Integration resolves this tension by adding a higher-level structure without pretending that all systems should become one undifferentiated whole.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Multiple systems operate independently, but their interactions create coordination failures, duplicated effort, incompatible interfaces, conflict, blind spots, cascading risks, or missed synergies that no single system can solve alone."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Silo boundaries separate decisions, information, resources, and standards while integrative mechanisms remain weak or absent.", "role_mapping": "Several systems -> siloed subsystems; shared dependencies -> cross-boundary coupling; missing layer -> coordination deficit.", "slug": "systemic_fragmentation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b040_a10_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Several systems share dependencies, users, resources, standards, risks, or outcomes but lack a recognized layer for joint decisions. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Several systems share dependencies, users, resources, standards, risks, or outcomes but lack a recognized layer for joint decisions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Systemic Fragmentation", "one_liner": "Siloed subsystems.", "page_ref": "prime:systemic_fragmentation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Several systems -> siloed subsystems; shared dependencies -> cross-boundary coupling; missing layer -> coordination deficit.", "slug": "systemic_fragmentation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Silo boundaries separate decisions, information, resources, and standards while integrative mechanisms remain weak or absent."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Several systems share dependencies, resources, users, standards, risks, or outcomes while lacking an effective joint-decision layer.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Separate local objectives omit interstage effects, so individually rational choices compound into a worse joint outcome.", "role_mapping": "System -> stage; local optimization -> scoped objective; burden on others -> omitted interstage effect.", "slug": "serial_local_optimization_failure", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "Local optimization is rewarded while cross-boundary coordination costs are not internalized.", "role_mapping": "System -> silo; local burden -> incentive and boundary externality.", "slug": "systemic_fragmentation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b040_a10_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Local optimization by one system creates burdens, risks, or inconsistencies for other systems. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Local optimization by one system creates burdens, risks, or inconsistencies for other systems."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Serial Local Optimization Failure", "one_liner": "Stages arranged in series each optimize a local objective while treating their effects on other stages as outside that objective, so individually rational choices compound into an outcome worse than joint optimization.", "page_ref": "prime:serial_local_optimization_failure", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "System -> stage; local optimization -> scoped objective; burden on others -> omitted interstage effect.", "slug": "serial_local_optimization_failure", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Separate local objectives omit interstage effects, so individually rational choices compound into a worse joint outcome."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Systemic Fragmentation", "one_liner": "Siloed subsystems.", "page_ref": "prime:systemic_fragmentation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "System -> silo; local burden -> incentive and boundary externality.", "slug": "systemic_fragmentation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Local optimization is rewarded while cross-boundary coordination costs are not internalized."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A subsystem's locally rational optimization imposes unscored burdens, risks, or inconsistencies on other subsystems.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P078-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve work whose completion depends on interaction among more than one system.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Operational work crosses or joins multiple independently operating systems.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail that the mechanism is load-bearing for successful cross-system operation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The cross-system work depends on the selected coordination mechanism.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve reliance on informal relationships.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The coordination mechanism is an informal relationship.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve reliance on an exceptional individual coordinator.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The coordination mechanism is a heroic coordinator.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve ad hoc negotiation rather than a standing coordination process.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The coordination mechanism is one-off negotiation.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve a fragile pairwise agreement as the coordination basis.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The coordination mechanism is a fragile bilateral agreement.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Cross-system work depends on informal relationships, heroic coordinators, one-off negotiations, or fragile bilateral agreements.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Cross-system work depends on one listed informal or fragile coordination mechanism.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P078-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Fragmented systems can have no informal bridge at all; heroic coordination is not mandatory.", "slug": "systemic_fragmentation"}], "residual_id": "r:metasystem_integration:b040_a10_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b040_a10_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Cross-system work depends on informal relationships, heroic coordinators, one-off negotiations, or fragile bilateral agreements. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Cross-system work depends on informal relationships, heroic coordinators, one-off negotiations, or fragile bilateral agreements."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Fragmented systems can have no informal bridge at all; heroic coordination is not mandatory.", "slug": "systemic_fragmentation"}], "normalized_requirement": "Cross-system work relies on heroic coordinators, informal relationships, one-off negotiation, or fragile bilateral agreements.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Cross-system work relies on heroic coordinators, informal relationships, one-off negotiation, or fragile bilateral agreements.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Multiple internally coherent subsystem models of one referent remain invisibly inconsistent until a forcing event demands joint action.", "role_mapping": "Partial views -> subsystem models; interaction pattern -> shared referent; seen together -> forcing-event comparison.", "slug": "inconsistent_shared_model", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b040_a10_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Each system has partial visibility, but the important pattern only appears when interactions across systems are seen together. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Each system has partial visibility, but the important pattern only appears when interactions across systems are seen together."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Inconsistent Shared Model", "one_liner": "Subsystems hold mutually incompatible models of the same external state, undetected until a forcing event requires joint action.", "page_ref": "prime:inconsistent_shared_model", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Partial views -> subsystem models; interaction pattern -> shared referent; seen together -> forcing-event comparison.", "slug": "inconsistent_shared_model", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Multiple internally coherent subsystem models of one referent remain invisibly inconsistent until a forcing event demands joint action."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Subsystems have locally defensible but mutually uncoupled views whose important inconsistency appears only when joint action is required.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P078-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve independently operating systems joined by a standard or interface.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Multiple systems are connected by a technical coordination mechanism.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail insufficiency despite the mechanism's presence, not complete interface absence.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The existing mechanism is insufficient for the required cross-system coordination.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a missing or unmet shared-interpretation capability.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Shared sensemaking is additionally required and is not supplied by the mechanism alone.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a missing or unmet dispute-resolution capability.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Conflict resolution is additionally required and is not supplied by the mechanism alone.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a missing or unmet cross-system accountability capability.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Accountability is additionally required and is not supplied by the mechanism alone.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve an existing standard as the insufficient mechanism.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The existing technical coordination mechanism is a standard.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve an existing interface as the insufficient mechanism.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The existing technical coordination mechanism is an interface.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Standards or interfaces exist across systems but remain insufficient because shared sensemaking, conflict resolution, and accountability are also required.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Existing technical coordination interfaces do not supply the shared governance capabilities required for cross-system coordination.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P078-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Fragmentation may arise because standards and interfaces are absent, not despite their presence.", "slug": "systemic_fragmentation"}], "residual_id": "r:metasystem_integration:b040_a10_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b040_a10_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Standards or interfaces exist, but they are not enough because shared sensemaking, conflict resolution, and accountability are also needed. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Standards or interfaces exist, but they are not enough because shared sensemaking, conflict resolution, and accountability are also needed."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Fragmentation may arise because standards and interfaces are absent, not despite their presence.", "slug": "systemic_fragmentation"}], "normalized_requirement": "Standards and interfaces exist but do not supply shared sensemaking, conflict resolution, or accountability.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Standards and interfaces exist but do not supply shared sensemaking, conflict resolution, or accountability.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P079-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve at least two systems whose separate operation is inadequate for the focal demand.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Multiple independently operating systems face the same focal demand.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail collective response as necessary, not merely beneficial or available.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The systems must respond collectively.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve a shock as the collective-response driver.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A shock creates the need for collective response.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve growth as the collective-response driver.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Growth pressure creates the need for collective response.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve a safety obligation as the collective-response driver.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "A safety obligation creates the need for collective response.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve ecosystem change as the collective-response driver.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "Ecosystem change creates the need for collective response.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve a shared mission as the collective-response driver.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "A shared mission creates the need for collective response.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Multiple independently operating systems must respond collectively to a shock, growth pressure, safety obligation, ecosystem change, or shared mission.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Multiple systems require a collective response because of one listed cross-system demand.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P079-C01-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Systemic risk concerns failure propagation and does not cover every shared mission, growth, or ecosystem response need.", "slug": "systemic_risk"}], "residual_id": "r:metasystem_integration:b040_a10_c7", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b040_a10_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The systems must respond collectively to shocks, growth, safety obligations, ecosystem change, or a shared mission. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The systems must respond collectively to shocks, growth, safety obligations, ecosystem change, or a shared mission."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_SYNTHESIS", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "S&OP disconnect can concern a shared forecast horizon without that horizon constituting the organization's mission, leaving O7 false absent the guard.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "S&OP Disconnect", "one_liner": "Diagnose a firm's downstream execution crises as an upstream planning defect — separate functions each holding an internally sound but mutually incompatible plan for the same future, because no binding forum reconciles them before commitments are taken.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:s_op_disconnect", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O7"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "functional_plans_commit_to_shared_mission", "predicate": "The incompatible functional plans are commitments toward one shared organizational mission.", "rationale": "The revised guard avoids equating a future with a mission and instead binds existing functional commitments to the mission branch without laundering any relation."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "s_op_disconnect"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The incompatible functional plans are commitments toward one shared organizational mission."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "s_op_disconnect", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P079-C01-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record supplies the multi-system collective-necessity spine; one atomic branch selection identifies the common demand as a shared mission."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The systems face a shock, growth pressure, safety obligation, ecosystem change, or shared mission requiring collective response.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A merger or central command would be too slow, illegitimate, brittle, or destructive of useful local variety.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially appropriate when a full merger or command hierarchy would be illegitimate, too slow, too brittle, or destructive of useful local variety. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: A merger or central command would be too slow, illegitimate, brittle, or destructive of useful local variety. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A merger or central command would be too slow, illegitimate, brittle, or destructive of useful local variety.", "It is especially appropriate when a full merger or command hierarchy would be illegitimate, too slow, too brittle, or destructive of useful local variety."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "A merger or central command would be too slow, illegitimate, brittle, or destructive of useful local variety."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 40, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-040", "ledger_sha256": "490f372c2ec12413ed77a3d6684f6b7585c4538a71b378c0960c4990dfa62daa"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Metric-Space Specification and Validation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:metric_space_specification_and_validation", "slug": "metric_space_specification_and_validation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 5, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 6 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system needs to reason about closeness, separation, local context, paths, neighborhoods, duplicates, clusters, or substitutions, but it has not specified a distance function that is both formally valid and meaningful for the domain. As a result, arbitrary scores masquerade as metric distance and downstream search, classification, routing, or threshold decisions become brittle.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system needs to reason about closeness, separation, local context, paths, neighborhoods, duplicates, clusters, or substitutions, but it has not specified a distance function that is both formally valid and meaningful for the domain. As a result, arbitrary scores masquerade as metric distance and downstream search, classification, routing, or threshold decisions become brittle."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P079-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O9"], ["O1", "O2", "O10"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require, rather than merely describe, comparison results for ordered or unordered pairs of items.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Items must be compared pairwise.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the prospective commitment that the required comparison result will be decision-relevant input to the downstream operation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The resulting pairwise comparison will drive the selected downstream function.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve retrieval driven by pairwise comparison.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The downstream function is retrieval.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve matching driven by pairwise comparison.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The downstream function is matching.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve clustering driven by pairwise comparison.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The downstream function is clustering.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve ranking driven by pairwise comparison.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The downstream function is ranking.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve routing driven by pairwise comparison.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The downstream function is routing.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve alerting driven by pairwise comparison.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The downstream function is alerting.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve segmentation driven by pairwise comparison.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "The downstream function is segmentation.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve inspection driven by pairwise comparison.", "obligation_id": "O10", "statement": "The downstream function is inspection.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Items must be compared pairwise, and the resulting comparison will drive retrieval, matching, clustering, ranking, routing, alerting, segmentation, or inspection.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A required pairwise comparison will drive one listed downstream decision or organization function.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P079-C02-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A similarity measure can be descriptive and unused by any downstream operation.", "slug": "similarity_measure"}], "residual_id": "r:metric_space_specification_and_validation:b040_a11_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b040_a11_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Items must be compared pairwise and the result will drive retrieval, matching, clustering, ranking, routing, alerting, segmentation, or inspection. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Items must be compared pairwise and the result will drive retrieval, matching, clustering, ranking, routing, alerting, segmentation, or inspection."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_GUARDED_EQUIVALENT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Under the comparison-based restriction, the algorithm cannot produce its ranked output without item comparisons driving the decision tree; non-comparison sorts are excluded by the one guard.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Sorting Algorithm", "one_liner": "A computational procedure that rearranges a finite sequence into a specified total order, located in a coordinate space of complexity, stability, and memory, and bounded below by the Ω(n log n) decision-tree floor for comparison-based sorts.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:sorting_algorithm", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1", "O2"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "sorting_algorithm_is_comparison_based", "predicate": "The sorting algorithm is comparison-based.", "rationale": "Both passes select the same explicit comparison-based sorting family; under that one restriction pairwise comparisons necessarily drive the ranked total-order output."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "sorting_algorithm"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The sorting algorithm is comparison-based."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "sorting_algorithm", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P079-C02-U1", "why_it_fits": "Sorting directly supplies ranking, and the single native domain restriction makes pairwise comparisons the required driver of that ranking."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Pairwise comparison drives retrieval, matching, clustering, ranking, routing, alerting, segmentation, or inspection.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P079-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an actor asserting a relation whose truth depends on a distance function.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A team makes a geometric or similarity claim about items.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail absence of an explicit distance function, not merely use of an unpopular one.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The governing distance rule is not named or specified.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve a similarity claim.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The unsupported claim is that the items are similar.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve a closeness claim.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The unsupported claim is that the items are close.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve a farness claim.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The unsupported claim is that the items are far apart.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve an adjacency claim.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The unsupported claim is that the items are adjacent.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve a neighborhood claim.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The unsupported claim is that the items are neighboring.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve a range-membership claim.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The unsupported claim is that the items are within range.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A team asserts that items are similar, close, far, adjacent, neighboring, or within range without naming the distance rule that makes the assertion true.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A geometric comparison claim is made without specifying its governing distance function.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P079-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A metric is an explicitly specified distance function, the opposite of this omission.", "slug": "metric"}], "residual_id": "r:metric_space_specification_and_validation:b040_a11_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b040_a11_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A team says items are similar, close, far, adjacent, neighboring, or within range without naming the distance rule that makes the claim true. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A team says items are similar, close, far, adjacent, neighboring, or within range without naming the distance rule that makes the claim true."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A metric is an explicitly specified distance function, the opposite of this omission.", "slug": "metric"}], "normalized_requirement": "Actors assert closeness, adjacency, neighborhood, or range without specifying the governing distance function.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Actors assert closeness, adjacency, neighborhood, or range without specifying the governing distance function.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P079-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O7", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O7", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O7", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O7", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve represented items and a distance computed between pairs.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A representation is used to calculate pairwise distance.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail possible systematic distortion, not a merely cosmetic representation change.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A feature of the representation can distort the computed distance.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve units as the possible distortion source.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The distortion source is the choice or scale of units.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve dimensions as the possible distortion source.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The distortion source is the selected dimensions.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve weights as the possible distortion source.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The distortion source is the assigned weights.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve encoding as the possible distortion source.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The distortion source is the encoding.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require multiple or heterogeneous units, dimensions, weights, or encodings for the feature selected by the branch, not a single isolated feature.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The representation contains multiple instances of the selected feature kind.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}], "predicate": "A representation contains multiple units, dimensions, weights, or encodings that can distort pairwise distance.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Multiple instances of one listed representation feature can distort pairwise distance.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P079-C04-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A similarity measure need not involve heterogeneous dimensions or distorted encoding.", "slug": "similarity_measure"}], "residual_id": "r:metric_space_specification_and_validation:b040_a11_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b040_a11_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A representation contains multiple units, dimensions, weights, or encodings that could distort pairwise distance. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A representation contains multiple units, dimensions, weights, or encodings that could distort pairwise distance."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A similarity measure need not involve heterogeneous dimensions or distorted encoding.", "slug": "similarity_measure"}], "normalized_requirement": "Units, dimensions, weights, or encodings can distort pairwise distance in the chosen representation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Units, dimensions, weights, or encodings can distort pairwise distance in the chosen representation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P079-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a downstream decision based on local relationships among represented items.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A local decision is computed in a represented space.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail that invalid distance geometry can change or invalidate the local decision.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The correctness of the decision depends on valid local metric geometry.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve nearest-neighbor selection.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The local decision uses a nearest-neighbor set.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve a radius-based decision.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The local decision uses a radius query.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve an outlier decision.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The local decision uses an outlier threshold.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve a path-distance decision.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The local decision uses a path length.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A nearest-neighbor, radius, outlier, or path decision depends on the validity of the local metric geometry.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "One listed local decision depends on valid metric geometry.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P079-C05-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A metric induces neighborhoods but need not be used for a nearest-neighbor or path decision.", "slug": "metric"}], "residual_id": "r:metric_space_specification_and_validation:b040_a11_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b040_a11_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Local decisions depend on nearest-neighbor sets, radius queries, outlier thresholds, or path lengths. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Local decisions depend on nearest-neighbor sets, radius queries, outlier thresholds, or path lengths."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A metric induces neighborhoods but need not be used for a nearest-neighbor or path decision.", "slug": "metric"}], "normalized_requirement": "Nearest-neighbor, radius, outlier, or path decisions depend on the validity of local metric geometry.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Nearest-neighbor, radius, outlier, or path decisions depend on the validity of local metric geometry.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P079-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve alternative distance functions over a common subject.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "At least two distance choices are applied to the same focal items or problem.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail distance choice as the cause of the result difference.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Changing the distance choice changes the downstream result.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a consequential change rather than negligible numerical variation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The resulting difference is material.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve different neighbors.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The changed result is the neighbor set.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve different clusters.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The changed result is the clustering.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve different routes.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The changed result is the route.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve different decisions.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The changed result is a decision outcome.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Alternative distance choices produce materially different neighbors, clusters, routes, or decision outcomes for the same items.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Alternative distance functions materially change one listed downstream result.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P079-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A metric does not entail that an alternative metric exists or yields a materially different result.", "slug": "metric"}], "residual_id": "r:metric_space_specification_and_validation:b040_a11_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b040_a11_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Alternative distance choices produce different neighbors, clusters, routes, or decision outcomes. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Alternative distance choices produce different neighbors, clusters, routes, or decision outcomes."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A metric does not entail that an alternative metric exists or yields a materially different result.", "slug": "metric"}], "normalized_requirement": "Alternative distance choices produce materially different neighbors, clusters, routes, or decisions.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Alternative distance choices produce materially different neighbors, clusters, routes, or decisions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P079-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a generic score, cost, divergence, penalty, similarity, or equivalent pairwise measure.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A pairwise score or relation not already established as a metric is available.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail substitution into a role that assumes distance geometry.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The measure is used as if it were metric distance.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve absence of validation of the metric axiom set, not a checked and valid metric.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Metric validity has not been checked against non-negativity, identity, symmetry, and triangle inequality.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "A score, cost, divergence, penalty, or similarity is used as metric distance without checking non-negativity, identity, symmetry, and triangle inequality.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A generic pairwise measure is treated as metric distance without metric-axiom validation.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P079-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A metric satisfies the axioms; it does not entail an unchecked nonmetric score.", "slug": "metric"}], "residual_id": "r:metric_space_specification_and_validation:b040_a11_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b040_a11_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A score, cost, divergence, penalty, or similarity measure is being used as if it were a metric without checking the axioms. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A score, cost, divergence, penalty, or similarity measure is being used as if it were a metric without checking the axioms."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A metric satisfies the axioms; it does not entail an unchecked nonmetric score.", "slug": "metric"}], "normalized_requirement": "A score, cost, divergence, penalty, or similarity is treated as metric distance without checking non-negativity, identity, symmetry, and triangle inequality.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A score, cost, divergence, penalty, or similarity is treated as metric distance without checking non-negativity, identity, symmetry, and triangle inequality.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The system needs to explain why one case is closer to another than to a third case.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The system needs to explain why one case is closer to another than to a third case. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The system needs to explain why one case is closer to another than to a third case."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "The system needs to explain why one case is closer to another than to a third case."}, {"display_text": "A metric-based model is being moved into a new population, representation, coordinate system, or domain.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: A metric-based model is being moved into a new population, representation, coordinate system, or domain. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A metric-based model is being moved into a new population, representation, coordinate system, or domain."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 8, "text": "A metric-based model is being moved into a new population, representation, coordinate system, or domain."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 40, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-040", "ledger_sha256": "490f372c2ec12413ed77a3d6684f6b7585c4538a71b378c0960c4990dfa62daa"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Microstructure-Mediated Property Tuning", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:microstructure_mediated_property_tuning", "slug": "microstructure_mediated_property_tuning"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system behaves unexpectedly because macro properties are being inferred from composition, part list, or gross form while the decisive causal structure sits at an intermediate scale. Teams change ingredients, components, or outer geometry while leaving the actual meso-scale arrangement unmanaged.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system behaves unexpectedly because macro properties are being inferred from composition, part list, or gross form while the decisive causal structure sits at an intermediate scale. Teams change ingredients, components, or outer geometry while leaving the actual meso-scale arrangement unmanaged."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Composition-and-form underdetermination is defining: identical parts and outer geometry can yield different bulk behavior through meso-scale arrangement.", "role_mapping": "Composition -> constituent inventory; gross form -> bulk geometry; performance -> macro property.", "slug": "microstructure", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b040_a12_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Two systems with similar composition and gross form perform differently. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Two systems with similar composition and gross form perform differently."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Microstructure", "one_liner": "Macro-level behavior is governed by an intermediate, meso-scale arrangement of parts, not by composition or gross form alone.", "page_ref": "prime:microstructure", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Composition -> constituent inventory; gross form -> bulk geometry; performance -> macro property.", "slug": "microstructure", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Composition-and-form underdetermination is defining: identical parts and outer geometry can yield different bulk behavior through meso-scale arrangement."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Systems with the same composition and gross form can perform differently because their intermediate arrangements differ.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P079-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O9"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve small magnitude relative to the baseline process or arrangement.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The change to the selected structure-forming process is small.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail the selected change as causal for the property change.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The process change produces a property difference.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a nonlinear or high-sensitivity magnitude contrast.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The property difference is disproportionately large relative to the process change.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve a processing change.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The changed process is processing.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve a packing change.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The changed process is packing.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve a cooling change.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The changed process is cooling.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve a growth-process change.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The changed process is growth.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve a scheduling change.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The changed process is scheduling.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve a topology change.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "The changed process is interaction topology.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A small change in processing, packing, cooling, growth, scheduling, or interaction topology produces a disproportionately large property difference.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A small change in one listed structure-forming process produces a disproportionately large property change.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P079-C08-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Processing history sets microstructure, but the exact record does not require a small change or disproportionate property response.", "slug": "microstructure"}], "residual_id": "r:microstructure_mediated_property_tuning:b040_a12_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b040_a12_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Small changes in processing, packing, cooling, growth, scheduling, or interaction topology produce large property differences. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Small changes in processing, packing, cooling, growth, scheduling, or interaction topology produce large property differences."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_SYNTHESIS", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Instrumentation can substantially alter runtime scheduling, so a heisenbug instance does not by itself establish a small perturbation or disproportionate magnitude.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Heisenbug", "one_liner": "Name the software defect whose failure vanishes under observation because attaching a debugger, adding a print, or disabling optimization perturbs the timing window or interleaving it rides on — so disappearance-under-observation is the diagnostic tell, not evidence the bug is gone.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:heisenbug", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1", "O3"], "guard_type": "THRESHOLD_CROSSING", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "observation_induces_small_scheduling_perturbation", "predicate": "The observation apparatus induces only a small execution-scheduling perturbation.", "rationale": "The guard constrains only one candidate-native scheduling perturbation and does not add a second relation; categorical failure disappearance then makes the magnitude contrast necessary."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "heisenbug"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The observation apparatus induces only a small execution-scheduling perturbation."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "heisenbug", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P079-C08-U1", "why_it_fits": "The candidate supplies scheduling-to-behavior causality and a categorical property shift; one atomic magnitude restriction completes the scheduling DNF branch."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Small processing, packing, cooling, growth, scheduling, or topology changes produce disproportionately large property differences.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The bulk property is explicitly underdetermined by what the constituent parts are.", "role_mapping": "Inventory -> composition; macro property -> bulk behavior.", "slug": "microstructure", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b040_a12_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A macro property such as strength, permeability, conductivity, resilience, liquidity, usability, or failure mode cannot be explained by inventory alone. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A macro property such as strength, permeability, conductivity, resilience, liquidity, usability, or failure mode cannot be explained by inventory alone."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Microstructure", "one_liner": "Macro-level behavior is governed by an intermediate, meso-scale arrangement of parts, not by composition or gross form alone.", "page_ref": "prime:microstructure", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Inventory -> composition; macro property -> bulk behavior.", "slug": "microstructure", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The bulk property is explicitly underdetermined by what the constituent parts are."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A macro property cannot be explained by component inventory alone.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Grain, phase, pore, interface, and connectivity arrangements are canonical load-bearing meso structures.", "role_mapping": "Listed arrangements -> microstructure; behavior -> bulk property.", "slug": "microstructure", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "A localized deviation concentrates and propagates through coupling channels to dictate macroscopic behavior.", "role_mapping": "Defect disjunct -> localized deviation; governs behavior -> propagated macro consequence.", "slug": "defect", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b040_a12_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Defects, pores, phases, interfaces, textures, or local connectivity patterns appear to govern behavior. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Defects, pores, phases, interfaces, textures, or local connectivity patterns appear to govern behavior."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Microstructure", "one_liner": "Macro-level behavior is governed by an intermediate, meso-scale arrangement of parts, not by composition or gross form alone.", "page_ref": "prime:microstructure", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Listed arrangements -> microstructure; behavior -> bulk property.", "slug": "microstructure", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Grain, phase, pore, interface, and connectivity arrangements are canonical load-bearing meso structures."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Defect", "one_liner": "A small, localised deviation from a regular structure that, propagating through the structure's coupling channels, dictates the system's macroscopic behaviour out of all proportion to its size.", "page_ref": "prime:defect", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Defect disjunct -> localized deviation; governs behavior -> propagated macro consequence.", "slug": "defect", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A localized deviation concentrates and propagates through coupling channels to dictate macroscopic behavior."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Defects, pores, phases, interfaces, textures, or local connectivity at an intermediate scale govern macro behavior.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P079-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve successful aggregate-level prediction rather than general model failure.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A coarse model predicts average or aggregate behavior.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail missing spatial, structural, or organizational localization.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The model does not identify where within the system the behavior is produced.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail missing production mechanism, not merely uncertainty in magnitude.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The model does not identify how the behavior is produced.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the contrast, not separate models or different focal behaviors.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Aggregate predictive success coexists with the localization and mechanism failures.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "A coarse model predicts average behavior but misses where and how the behavior is produced.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A coarse model predicts aggregate behavior while missing its location and production mechanism.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P079-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Microstructure can be modeled explicitly; its existence does not entail a coarse average model.", "slug": "microstructure"}], "residual_id": "r:microstructure_mediated_property_tuning:b040_a12_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b040_a12_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A coarse model predicts average behavior but misses where and how behavior is produced. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A coarse model predicts average behavior but misses where and how behavior is produced."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Microstructure can be modeled explicitly; its existence does not entail a coarse average model.", "slug": "microstructure"}], "normalized_requirement": "A coarse model predicts averages but misses where and how the property is produced.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A coarse model predicts averages but misses where and how the property is produced.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P079-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail repeated quality problems rather than one isolated defect.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Quality failures recur.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve actual conformance rather than unknown or violated specification status.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The system complies with the selected nominal specification.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve coexistence of recurrent failure and nominal conformance in the same system.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The quality failures occur despite that specification compliance.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve composition-level compliance.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The met nominal specification concerns composition.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve gross-form compliance.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The met nominal specification concerns gross form.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Quality failures recur even though nominal composition or gross-form specifications are met.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Quality failures recur despite compliance with one listed nominal specification layer.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P079-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A microstructure can produce excellent conforming performance with no recurring quality problem.", "slug": "microstructure"}], "residual_id": "r:microstructure_mediated_property_tuning:b040_a12_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b040_a12_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Quality problems recur even when nominal specifications are met. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Quality problems recur even when nominal specifications are met."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A microstructure can produce excellent conforming performance with no recurring quality problem.", "slug": "microstructure"}], "normalized_requirement": "Quality failures recur despite compliance with nominal composition or gross-form specifications.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Quality failures recur despite compliance with nominal composition or gross-form specifications.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 40, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-040", "ledger_sha256": "490f372c2ec12413ed77a3d6684f6b7585c4538a71b378c0960c4990dfa62daa"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Migration-Resistant Hazard Control", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:migration_resistant_hazard_control", "slug": "migration_resistant_hazard_control"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 7, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 7, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "7 of 8 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 8}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A control is optimized and evaluated inside a boundary narrower than the system that generates and receives the hazard. It blocks one manifestation but does not reduce the underlying demand, load, incentive, source, adversarial objective, or exposure pathway. The unresolved pressure follows an unmodeled transfer or return path to another site, actor, channel, phase, or population—often one with weaker controls and measurement—so the initiating unit reports success while system-wide burden persists or worsens.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A control is optimized and evaluated inside a boundary narrower than the system that generates and receives the hazard. It blocks one manifestation but does not reduce the underlying demand, load, incentive, source, adversarial objective, or exposure pathway. The unresolved pressure follows an unmodeled transfer or return path to another site, actor, channel, phase, or population—often one with weaker controls and measurement—so the initiating unit reports success while system-wide burden persists or worsens."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Unabsorbed generative pressure crosses a permeable boundary and reappears through a substitute or return path.", "role_mapping": "Substitution dimensions -> alternate destinations; hazard -> conserved pressure manifestation.", "slug": "risk_migration", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b040_a13_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The hazard can substitute across locations, channels, products, actors, targets, times, or lifecycle phases. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The hazard can substitute across locations, channels, products, actors, targets, times, or lifecycle phases."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Risk Migration", "one_liner": "An intervention that blocks a hazard at one site without absorbing the generative pressure behind it does not eliminate the hazard but relocates it across a permeable boundary to a less-monitored region, often where controls are weaker and measurement does not follow.", "page_ref": "prime:risk_migration", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Substitution dimensions -> alternate destinations; hazard -> conserved pressure manifestation.", "slug": "risk_migration", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Unabsorbed generative pressure crosses a permeable boundary and reappears through a substitute or return path."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The hazard can substitute across sites, channels, products, actors, targets, times, or lifecycle phases.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A non-absorbing intervention blocks one local path without reducing the generative pressure.", "role_mapping": "Proposed intervention -> local control; barrier or ban -> blocked path.", "slug": "risk_migration", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b040_a13_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A proposed intervention is primarily a barrier, ban, quota, filter, exclusion, routing rule, local enforcement action, or transfer of responsibility. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A proposed intervention is primarily a barrier, ban, quota, filter, exclusion, routing rule, local enforcement action, or transfer of responsibility."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Risk Migration", "one_liner": "An intervention that blocks a hazard at one site without absorbing the generative pressure behind it does not eliminate the hazard but relocates it across a permeable boundary to a less-monitored region, often where controls are weaker and measurement does not follow.", "page_ref": "prime:risk_migration", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Proposed intervention -> local control; barrier or ban -> blocked path.", "slug": "risk_migration", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A non-absorbing intervention blocks one local path without reducing the generative pressure."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The proposed control mainly blocks, bans, filters, excludes, reroutes, or transfers one local manifestation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A conserved generative pressure remains after the local intervention, making relocation rather than elimination possible.", "role_mapping": "Underlying pressure -> conserved generator; remains -> non-absorption.", "slug": "risk_migration", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b040_a13_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The underlying demand, incentive, workload, contaminant source, conflict, adversarial objective, or failure pressure remains after the control acts. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The underlying demand, incentive, workload, contaminant source, conflict, adversarial objective, or failure pressure remains after the control acts."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Risk Migration", "one_liner": "An intervention that blocks a hazard at one site without absorbing the generative pressure behind it does not eliminate the hazard but relocates it across a permeable boundary to a less-monitored region, often where controls are weaker and measurement does not follow.", "page_ref": "prime:risk_migration", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Underlying pressure -> conserved generator; remains -> non-absorption.", "slug": "risk_migration", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A conserved generative pressure remains after the local intervention, making relocation rather than elimination possible."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The demand, incentive, load, contaminant source, conflict, adversarial objective, or failure pressure persists after the control acts.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The hazard relocates into a less-protected, less-monitored region across the boundary.", "role_mapping": "Destination -> less-protected zone; varying control -> protection and measurement asymmetry.", "slug": "risk_migration", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b040_a13_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Control strength and monitoring quality vary across plausible destinations. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Control strength and monitoring quality vary across plausible destinations."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Risk Migration", "one_liner": "An intervention that blocks a hazard at one site without absorbing the generative pressure behind it does not eliminate the hazard but relocates it across a permeable boundary to a less-monitored region, often where controls are weaker and measurement does not follow.", "page_ref": "prime:risk_migration", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Destination -> less-protected zone; varying control -> protection and measurement asymmetry.", "slug": "risk_migration", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The hazard relocates into a less-protected, less-monitored region across the boundary."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Plausible destination zones differ in control strength or monitoring quality.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Its measurement asymmetry instruments the protected zone while burden reappears outside the evaluator's boundary.", "role_mapping": "Local metric -> protected-zone instrument; downstream outcomes -> unmeasured destination loss.", "slug": "risk_migration", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b040_a13_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The initiating organization owns the local metric but not downstream outcomes. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The initiating organization owns the local metric but not downstream outcomes."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Risk Migration", "one_liner": "An intervention that blocks a hazard at one site without absorbing the generative pressure behind it does not eliminate the hazard but relocates it across a permeable boundary to a less-monitored region, often where controls are weaker and measurement does not follow.", "page_ref": "prime:risk_migration", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Local metric -> protected-zone instrument; downstream outcomes -> unmeasured destination loss.", "slug": "risk_migration", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Its measurement asymmetry instruments the protected zone while burden reappears outside the evaluator's boundary."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The initiating organization measures the protected zone but does not own or observe downstream outcomes.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Selection under a targeted control favors variants that mutate or alter identity to evade it.", "role_mapping": "Hazard producer -> evolving variant; control -> selective pressure; adaptation -> escape.", "slug": "vaccine_escape", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b040_a13_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The hazard or its producers are adaptive and can learn, mutate, arbitrage, or change identity. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The hazard or its producers are adaptive and can learn, mutate, arbitrage, or change identity."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Vaccine Escape", "one_liner": "A durable barrier imposed on an adaptive population acts as a selection filter, shifting the population toward variants it cannot engage, so effective coverage falls even though the barrier still works exactly as designed.", "page_ref": "prime:vaccine_escape", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Hazard producer -> evolving variant; control -> selective pressure; adaptation -> escape.", "slug": "vaccine_escape", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Selection under a targeted control favors variants that mutate or alter identity to evade it."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Hazard producers can learn, mutate, arbitrage, or change identity in response to the control.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Risk migration may be immediate and visible within the initial evaluation window.", "slug": "risk_migration"}], "residual_id": "r:migration_resistant_hazard_control:b040_a13_c7", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b040_a13_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The unresolved pressure follows an unmodeled transfer or return path to another site, actor, channel, phase, or population—often one with weaker controls and measurement—so the initiating unit reports success while system-wide burden persists or worsens. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A short evaluation window can miss delayed return, accumulation, or lifecycle transfer.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A short evaluation window can miss delayed return, accumulation, or lifecycle transfer.", "The unresolved pressure follows an unmodeled transfer or return path to another site, actor, channel, phase, or population—often one with weaker controls and measurement—so the initiating unit reports success while system-wide burden persists or worsens."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Risk migration may be immediate and visible within the initial evaluation window.", "slug": "risk_migration"}], "normalized_requirement": "A short evaluation window can miss delayed return, accumulation, or lifecycle transfer.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A short evaluation window can miss delayed return, accumulation, or lifecycle transfer.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The protected-zone measurement boundary is constitutive: local success is reported while the relocated loss is unobserved.", "role_mapping": "New intervention boundary -> protected-zone boundary; old measurement -> local instrument.", "slug": "risk_migration", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b040_a13_c8", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The intervention creates a new boundary that the old measurement system does not cross. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The intervention creates a new boundary that the old measurement system does not cross."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Risk Migration", "one_liner": "An intervention that blocks a hazard at one site without absorbing the generative pressure behind it does not eliminate the hazard but relocates it across a permeable boundary to a less-monitored region, often where controls are weaker and measurement does not follow.", "page_ref": "prime:risk_migration", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "New intervention boundary -> protected-zone boundary; old measurement -> local instrument.", "slug": "risk_migration", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The protected-zone measurement boundary is constitutive: local success is reported while the relocated loss is unobserved."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The intervention creates a boundary that the legacy measurement system does not cross.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [8], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 40, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-040", "ledger_sha256": "490f372c2ec12413ed77a3d6684f6b7585c4538a71b378c0960c4990dfa62daa"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Minimal-Change Counterfactual Construction", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:minimal_change_counterfactual_construction", "slug": "minimal_change_counterfactual_construction"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "People evaluate causal claims, choices, responsibilities, or alternatives by constructing counterfactual scenarios that silently alter many background facts. The stated antecedent may be small, but the imagined alternative changes timing, incentives, knowledge, constraints, actors, categories, or downstream conditions until the desired conclusion appears. Because the added changes are not separated from changes actually entailed by the antecedent, the counterfactual loses evidential value and becomes an idealized, cherry-picked, or self-protective story.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "People evaluate causal claims, choices, responsibilities, or alternatives by constructing counterfactual scenarios that silently alter many background facts. The stated antecedent may be small, but the imagined alternative changes timing, incentives, knowledge, constraints, actors, categories, or downstream conditions until the desired conclusion appears. Because the added changes are not separated from changes actually entailed by the antecedent, the counterfactual loses evidential value and becomes an idealized, cherry-picked, or self-protective story."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The principle constructs alternatives by varying the target antecedent while preserving actual background facts.", "role_mapping": "Named difference -> antecedent; alternative -> nearest possible world.", "slug": "minimal_modification_principle", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b040_a14_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A claim depends on what would have happened if one fact, action, policy, event, or condition had been different. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A claim depends on what would have happened if one fact, action, policy, event, or condition had been different."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Minimal Modification Principle", "one_liner": "Preserve true facts when constructing alternative scenarios.", "page_ref": "prime:minimal_modification_principle", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Named difference -> antecedent; alternative -> nearest possible world.", "slug": "minimal_modification_principle", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The principle constructs alternatives by varying the target antecedent while preserving actual background facts."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A causal or evaluative claim turns on an alternative in which a named fact, action, policy, event, or condition differs.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P079-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a deliberately limited focal change in the imagined alternative.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A counterfactual scenario has a stated narrow antecedent change.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail the risk or possibility of drift across more than one background fact, not require that such drift has already occurred.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Multiple background assumptions may also change in the imagined world.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must distinguish the possibility of gratuitous background drift from consequences required by the antecedent.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Any possible additional changes are unrelated to or not entailed by the stated antecedent.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a risk of silent drift rather than require an already-realized, fully specified multi-change scenario.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The possible background drift is not explicitly acknowledged.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "A counterfactual states a narrow antecedent change while its imagined world may silently drift across many other background assumptions.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A narrow counterfactual antecedent is paired with the possibility of unacknowledged drift across multiple independent background facts.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P079-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The principle requires preserving unrelated true facts, the opposite of silent multi-assumption drift.", "slug": "minimal_modification_principle"}], "residual_id": "r:minimal_change_counterfactual_construction:b040_a14_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b040_a14_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The counterfactual antecedent is narrow, but the imagined world may drift across many other assumptions. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The counterfactual antecedent is narrow, but the imagined world may drift across many other assumptions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The principle requires preserving unrelated true facts, the opposite of silent multi-assumption drift.", "slug": "minimal_modification_principle"}], "normalized_requirement": "A narrow antecedent change is accompanied by silent drift in many unrelated assumptions.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A narrow antecedent change is accompanied by silent drift in many unrelated assumptions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P079-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve multiple reviewers evaluating one focal antecedent or event.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "At least two reviewers construct alternatives for the same counterfactual question.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail divergent ceteris-paribus selections.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The reviewers hold different background facts fixed.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve mutually inconsistent alternative worlds or conclusions, not compatible elaborations.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The resulting counterfactual alternatives are incompatible.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the ceteris-paribus divergence as explanatory of the incompatible alternatives.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The different fixed-background choices cause the incompatibility.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Different reviewers construct incompatible counterfactual alternatives because they hold different background facts fixed.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Reviewers derive incompatible counterfactual worlds by preserving different background facts.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P079-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Reviewers applying the same minimal-modification ordering can agree; disagreement is not mandatory.", "slug": "minimal_modification_principle"}], "residual_id": "r:minimal_change_counterfactual_construction:b040_a14_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b040_a14_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Different reviewers construct incompatible alternatives because they preserve different background facts. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Different reviewers construct incompatible alternatives because they preserve different background facts."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Reviewers applying the same minimal-modification ordering can agree; disagreement is not mandatory.", "slug": "minimal_modification_principle"}], "normalized_requirement": "Reviewers construct incompatible alternatives because they hold different background facts fixed.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Reviewers construct incompatible alternatives because they hold different background facts fixed.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact error substitutes an unattainable ideal benchmark for the best feasible alternative when judging a real option.", "role_mapping": "Comparison option -> available choice; idealized baseline -> infeasible benchmark.", "slug": "nirvana_fallacy", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b040_a14_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A comparison option is rejected or accepted based on an idealized or degraded baseline that was not actually available. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A comparison option is rejected or accepted based on an idealized or degraded baseline that was not actually available."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Nirvana Fallacy", "one_liner": "Rejecting a real, available option because it falls short of an idealized counterfactual, when the operative comparison should be against the best feasible alternative.", "page_ref": "prime:nirvana_fallacy", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Comparison option -> available choice; idealized baseline -> infeasible benchmark.", "slug": "nirvana_fallacy", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact error substitutes an unattainable ideal benchmark for the best feasible alternative when judging a real option."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "An available option is judged against an idealized or degraded comparison baseline outside the feasible choice set.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "It preserves every actual fact except the antecedent and changes forced by it, excluding arbitrary embellishment.", "role_mapping": "Necessary consequence -> antecedent-entailment closure; embellishment -> gratuitous divergence.", "slug": "minimal_modification_principle", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b040_a14_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The reasoning must distinguish a logically or causally necessary consequence of the antecedent from a gratuitous scenario embellishment. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The reasoning must distinguish a logically or causally necessary consequence of the antecedent from a gratuitous scenario embellishment."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Minimal Modification Principle", "one_liner": "Preserve true facts when constructing alternative scenarios.", "page_ref": "prime:minimal_modification_principle", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Necessary consequence -> antecedent-entailment closure; embellishment -> gratuitous divergence.", "slug": "minimal_modification_principle", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "It preserves every actual fact except the antecedent and changes forced by it, excluding arbitrary embellishment."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Reasoning must separate consequences causally or logically entailed by the antecedent from gratuitous scenario embellishment.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "An alternative scenario will be used to infer causation, responsibility, regret, feasibility, harm, benefit, or policy value.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "People evaluate causal claims, choices, responsibilities, or alternatives by constructing counterfactual scenarios that silently alter many background facts. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: An alternative scenario will be used to infer causation, responsibility, regret, feasibility, harm, benefit, or policy value. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["An alternative scenario will be used to infer causation, responsibility, regret, feasibility, harm, benefit, or policy value.", "People evaluate causal claims, choices, responsibilities, or alternatives by constructing counterfactual scenarios that silently alter many background facts."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "An alternative scenario will be used to infer causation, responsibility, regret, feasibility, harm, benefit, or policy value."}, {"display_text": "Counterfactual claims will be communicated to users who may not see which facts were held fixed.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "People evaluate causal claims, choices, responsibilities, or alternatives by constructing counterfactual scenarios that silently alter many background facts. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Counterfactual claims will be communicated to users who may not see which facts were held fixed. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Counterfactual claims will be communicated to users who may not see which facts were held fixed.", "People evaluate causal claims, choices, responsibilities, or alternatives by constructing counterfactual scenarios that silently alter many background facts."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "Counterfactual claims will be communicated to users who may not see which facts were held fixed."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 40, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-040", "ledger_sha256": "490f372c2ec12413ed77a3d6684f6b7585c4538a71b378c0960c4990dfa62daa"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Minimal-Disclosure Verification", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:minimal_disclosure_verification", "slug": "minimal_disclosure_verification"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Verification demands evidence, but the available evidence contains more information than the decision requires. Direct disclosure solves the trust problem by creating a new exposure problem.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Verification demands evidence, but the available evidence contains more information than the decision requires. Direct disclosure solves the trust problem by creating a new exposure problem."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact protocol has a prover, verifier, public predicate, and accept-or-reject truth claim.", "role_mapping": "Claimant -> prover; bounded predicate -> public claim; decision-maker -> verifier.", "slug": "zero_knowledge_proof", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "Authentication establishes a bounded identity or credential-possession claim for a relying party.", "role_mapping": "Claimant -> subject; predicate -> identity or credential claim; verifier -> relying system.", "slug": "authentication", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b040_a15_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A claimant, holder, system, or institution needs to prove that a bounded predicate is true. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A claimant, holder, system, or institution needs to prove that a bounded predicate is true."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Zero Knowledge Proof", "one_liner": "Convince a verifier a claim is true while revealing nothing beyond its truth.", "page_ref": "prime:zero_knowledge_proof", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Claimant -> prover; bounded predicate -> public claim; decision-maker -> verifier.", "slug": "zero_knowledge_proof", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact protocol has a prover, verifier, public predicate, and accept-or-reject truth claim."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Authentication", "one_liner": "Binding an asserted identity or origin to admissible evidence through a procedure that yields a verdict, before trust, access, or weight is granted.", "page_ref": "prime:authentication", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Claimant -> subject; predicate -> identity or credential claim; verifier -> relying system.", "slug": "authentication", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Authentication establishes a bounded identity or credential-possession claim for a relying party."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A prover must convince a verifier that a bounded public predicate is true.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Zero knowledge separates the public claim from the hidden witness and reveals nothing beyond truth.", "role_mapping": "Decision -> verifier acceptance; raw evidence -> hidden witness.", "slug": "zero_knowledge_proof", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b040_a15_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The verifier does not need the raw witness, complete credential, full dataset, exact identity, or private computation trace to make the intended decision. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The verifier does not need the raw witness, complete credential, full dataset, exact identity, or private computation trace to make the intended decision."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Zero Knowledge Proof", "one_liner": "Convince a verifier a claim is true while revealing nothing beyond its truth.", "page_ref": "prime:zero_knowledge_proof", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Decision -> verifier acceptance; raw evidence -> hidden witness.", "slug": "zero_knowledge_proof", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Zero knowledge separates the public claim from the hidden witness and reveals nothing beyond truth."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The verifier can decide from the predicate's truth without receiving the raw witness, full record, exact identity attributes, or private trace.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A witness can be withheld as a protocol property without a separately demonstrated harm from disclosure.", "slug": "zero_knowledge_proof"}], "residual_id": "r:minimal_disclosure_verification:b040_a15_c3", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b040_a15_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Disclosure of the witness would create privacy, security, legal, strategic, bias, surveillance, or downstream misuse risk. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Disclosure of the witness would create privacy, security, legal, strategic, bias, surveillance, or downstream misuse risk."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A witness can be withheld as a protocol property without a separately demonstrated harm from disclosure.", "slug": "zero_knowledge_proof"}], "normalized_requirement": "Revealing the witness would create privacy, security, legal, strategic, bias, surveillance, or misuse risk.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Revealing the witness would create privacy, security, legal, strategic, bias, surveillance, or misuse risk.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A well-defined public predicate is a mandatory protocol component.", "role_mapping": "Checkable claim -> public predicate; membership or possession -> witness relation.", "slug": "zero_knowledge_proof", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "Verification necessarily applies a check to a truth-evaluable claim or specification.", "role_mapping": "Checkable predicate -> verification criterion; verdict -> pass or fail.", "slug": "verification", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b040_a15_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The claim can be expressed as a checkable predicate, threshold, membership statement, possession statement, consistency condition, or compliance verdict. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The claim can be expressed as a checkable predicate, threshold, membership statement, possession statement, consistency condition, or compliance verdict."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Zero Knowledge Proof", "one_liner": "Convince a verifier a claim is true while revealing nothing beyond its truth.", "page_ref": "prime:zero_knowledge_proof", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Checkable claim -> public predicate; membership or possession -> witness relation.", "slug": "zero_knowledge_proof", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A well-defined public predicate is a mandatory protocol component."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Verification", "one_liner": "Check that an object conforms to its specification via a defined procedure yielding evidence and a verdict.", "page_ref": "prime:verification", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Checkable predicate -> verification criterion; verdict -> pass or fail.", "slug": "verification", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Verification necessarily applies a check to a truth-evaluable claim or specification."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The claim is expressible as a checkable predicate, threshold, membership, possession, consistency, or compliance statement.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The verifier can rely on a defined proof procedure, attestation chain, credential scheme, or trusted computation boundary rather than ad hoc inspection.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: The verifier can rely on a defined proof procedure, attestation chain, credential scheme, or trusted computation boundary rather than ad hoc inspection. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The verifier can rely on a defined proof procedure, attestation chain, credential scheme, or trusted computation boundary rather than ad hoc inspection."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The verifier can rely on a defined proof procedure, attestation chain, credential scheme, or trusted computation boundary rather than ad hoc inspection."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 40, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-040", "ledger_sha256": "490f372c2ec12413ed77a3d6684f6b7585c4538a71b378c0960c4990dfa62daa"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Minimum Effective Intervention", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:minimum_effective_intervention", "slug": "minimum_effective_intervention"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 4 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is overintervention under uncertainty or habit. A system responds to intervention intensity, but the chosen intensity is stronger than needed or stronger than can be justified by current evidence. The excess intensity may still achieve the target outcome, which can hide the fact that avoidable harm is being created alongside success.\n\nCommon signs include working interventions that produce fatigue or resentment, enforcement regimes that escalate too quickly, training programs that add load after progress is already occurring, alerting systems that catch incidents but exhaust attention, and budgets or staffing levels that increase without knowing whether the extra increment changes outcomes.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system can be moved by varying intervention intensity, but actors default to stronger-than-needed action because stronger action feels safer, more decisive, easier to justify, or more habitual; the extra intensity creates avoidable cost, harm, resistance, tolerance, saturation, or depletion."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A crossover interaction can compare levels without giving an operational intervention a continuously adjustable intensity.", "slug": "crossover_interaction"}], "residual_id": "r:minimum_effective_intervention:b041_a01_c1", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b041_a01_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The intervention has an adjustable intensity dimension rather than only an on/off choice. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The intervention has an adjustable intensity dimension rather than only an on/off choice."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A crossover interaction can compare levels without giving an operational intervention a continuously adjustable intensity.", "slug": "crossover_interaction"}], "normalized_requirement": "The intervention exposes a graded intensity dimension rather than a purely binary choice.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The intervention exposes a graded intensity dimension rather than a purely binary choice.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P079-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O10", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O10", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O10", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O10", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O10", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O10", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O10", "O9"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an intensity baseline that already suffices and an intervention above it.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The intervention is stronger than the level sufficient for the focal objective.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail marginal harm caused by strength beyond sufficiency.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The excess intensity adds an adverse consequence.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve added side effects.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The added consequence is side effects.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve added burden.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The added consequence is burden.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve added cost.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The added consequence is cost.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve added resistance.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The added consequence is resistance.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve added fatigue.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The added consequence is fatigue.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve added distrust or lost trust.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The added consequence is loss of trust.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve depletion of the ability to intensify later.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "The added consequence is loss of future escalation capacity.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require a material or meaningful marginal harm, not a negligible added effect.", "obligation_id": "O10", "statement": "The selected added adverse consequence is meaningful in magnitude.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Intervention intensity above the sufficient level adds meaningful side effects, burden, cost, resistance, fatigue, loss of trust, or loss of future escalation capacity.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Intervention intensity beyond sufficiency adds one listed marginal harm of meaningful magnitude.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P079-C13-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A counterresponse can offset benefit at any intensity and does not require stronger intervention to create the listed burdens.", "slug": "counterresponse_offset"}], "residual_id": "r:minimum_effective_intervention:b041_a01_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b041_a01_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Stronger intervention carries meaningful side effects, burden, cost, resistance, fatigue, loss of trust, or loss of future escalation capacity. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Stronger intervention carries meaningful side effects, burden, cost, resistance, fatigue, loss of trust, or loss of future escalation capacity."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Under the native false-positive-dominance branch, the excess alarms add no focal warning value yet necessarily exhaust attention and produce habitual silencing, so the selected DNF branch cannot be falsified.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Alarm Fatigue", "one_liner": "Reframe an operator's habitual silencing of clinical alarms as the rational response to a warning channel whose predictive value has collapsed, relocating the fix from the operator's discipline to the channel's specificity.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:alarm_fatigue", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "alarm_stream_is_false_positive_dominated", "predicate": "The excessive clinical-alarm stream is dominated by false-positive alarms.", "rationale": "Selecting the candidate's expressly named false-positive-dominated pathway establishes unnecessary excess firings while leaving the consequential fatigue mechanism intact."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "alarm_fatigue"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The excessive clinical-alarm stream is dominated by false-positive alarms."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "alarm_fatigue", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P079-C13-U1", "why_it_fits": "Alarm fatigue supplies the adverse fatigue spine; one atomic selection of its named false-positive pathway establishes excess above the sufficient true-warning level."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "If prompt frequency and low consequence rate were not excessive enough to train dismissal and nullify the rare circuit breaker, the defining confirmation-fatigue mechanism would be absent.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Confirmation Fatigue", "one_liner": "The interaction-design failure where a blocking confirmation prompt fires so often, and so rarely marks a truly consequential choice, that users develop an automatic dismiss reflex that discharges the prompt without reading it — leaving it syntactically present but informationally inert.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:confirmation_fatigue", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "confirmation_fatigue"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "confirmation_fatigue", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P079-C13-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record directly entails over-intense prompting that causes meaningful user fatigue and renders the intervention ineffective when it matters."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "With false-positive dominance fixed, the excess firings are unnecessary for true protection and the exact record still requires habituation and discounting of later warnings, completing the fatigue branch.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Public-Warning Fatigue", "one_liner": "The emergency-communication failure in which a warning authority fires often enough, or with enough false positives, that the population habituates and discounts subsequent warnings — spending down a depletable, asymmetrically-rebuilt credibility budget.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:public_warning_fatigue", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "public_warning_stream_is_false_positive_dominated", "predicate": "The excessive public-warning stream is dominated by false-positive warnings.", "rationale": "The false-positive-dominated native branch makes excess relative to protective value necessary, while the candidate directly supplies meaningful habituation and trust loss."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "public_warning_fatigue"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The excessive public-warning stream is dominated by false-positive warnings."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "public_warning_fatigue", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P079-C13-U1", "why_it_fits": "Public-warning fatigue supplies the causal and meaningful-fatigue relations, while one named native branch fact establishes excess intervention intensity."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_SYNTHESIS", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A response may be below the volunteer level sufficient for its objective even while arrivals exceed intake throughput, so the candidate alone does not establish O1.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Volunteer-Management Overload", "one_liner": "The crisis failure mode in which would-be helpers arrive faster than a response system's finite credential-brief-assign-supervise intake channel can absorb them, so beyond a threshold each marginal arrival consumes net capacity rather than adding it.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:volunteer_management_overload", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "THRESHOLD_CROSSING", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "accepted_volunteer_complement_is_sufficient", "predicate": "Before the marginal arrivals, the accepted volunteer complement is sufficient for the response objective.", "rationale": "The guard is a single threshold-baseline fact anchored in the finite intake channel; it does not restate the overload harm or import another relation."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "volunteer_management_overload"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "Before the marginal arrivals, the accepted volunteer complement is sufficient for the response objective."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "volunteer_management_overload", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P079-C13-U1", "why_it_fits": "One baseline-sufficiency guard closes the comparison gap; the candidate directly supplies excess-arrival causality and meaningful burden."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Intensity above the sufficient level adds side effects, burden, cost, resistance, fatigue, distrust, or loss of future capacity.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P079-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an intensity-setting decision by a responsible agent or institution.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An actor or organization chooses an intervention intensity.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail a systematic upward bias rather than one justified high-intensity choice.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The decision-maker has a tendency to increase or escalate intensity.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the listed non-necessity factor as explanatory of escalation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The selected driver causes or sustains the upward intensity bias.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve habitual escalation.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Habit drives the intensity escalation.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve anxiety-driven escalation.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Anxiety drives the intensity escalation.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve status-driven escalation.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "Status pressure drives the intensity escalation.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve defensive-practice escalation.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "Defensive practice drives the intensity escalation.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve escalation copied from precedent.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "Copied precedent drives the intensity escalation.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "An actor or organization tends to escalate intervention intensity because of habit, anxiety, status pressure, defensive practice, or copied precedent.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "One listed non-necessity driver biases intervention intensity upward.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P079-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Proportionality is a normative fit between response and harm and does not entail an escalation bias.", "slug": "proportionality"}], "residual_id": "r:minimum_effective_intervention:b041_a01_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b041_a01_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The organization or actor tends to escalate intensity by habit, anxiety, status pressure, defensive practice, or copied precedent. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The organization or actor tends to escalate intensity by habit, anxiety, status pressure, defensive practice, or copied precedent."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Proportionality is a normative fit between response and harm and does not entail an escalation bias.", "slug": "proportionality"}], "normalized_requirement": "Habit, anxiety, status pressure, defensive practice, or precedent biases actors toward greater intensity.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Habit, anxiety, status pressure, defensive practice, or precedent biases actors toward greater intensity.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A counterresponse may make every tested intensity ineffective and does not establish a sufficient lower dose.", "slug": "counterresponse_offset"}], "residual_id": "r:minimum_effective_intervention:b041_a01_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b041_a01_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A lower-intensity intervention may preserve responsiveness, legitimacy, safety, resources, or optionality while still achieving the target effect. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A lower-intensity intervention may preserve responsiveness, legitimacy, safety, resources, or optionality while still achieving the target effect."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A counterresponse may make every tested intensity ineffective and does not establish a sufficient lower dose.", "slug": "counterresponse_offset"}], "normalized_requirement": "A lower intensity can preserve responsiveness, legitimacy, safety, resources, or optionality while still meeting the effect threshold.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A lower intensity can preserve responsiveness, legitimacy, safety, resources, or optionality while still meeting the effect threshold.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Lower and higher intensities can both be tried or inferred with acceptable safety and evidence standards.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system responds to intervention intensity, but the chosen intensity is stronger than needed or stronger than can be justified by current evidence. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: Lower and higher intensities can both be tried or inferred with acceptable safety and evidence standards. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Lower and higher intensities can both be tried or inferred with acceptable safety and evidence standards.", "A system responds to intervention intensity, but the chosen intensity is stronger than needed or stronger than can be justified by current evidence."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "Lower and higher intensities can both be tried or inferred with acceptable safety and evidence standards."}, {"display_text": "The desired effect can be defined well enough to say when the intervention is sufficient.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Minimum Effective Intervention creates a disciplined alternative: enough force to work, no extra force without a reason. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: The desired effect can be defined well enough to say when the intervention is sufficient. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The desired effect can be defined well enough to say when the intervention is sufficient.", "Minimum Effective Intervention creates a disciplined alternative: enough force to work, no extra force without a reason."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "The desired effect can be defined well enough to say when the intervention is sufficient."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 41, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-041", "ledger_sha256": "672ab11f3edf16b49307a391eafbdd179b6f11ca9c2b493acd29ca2ad6b6e13e"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Minimum Sufficient Solution", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:minimum_sufficient_solution", "slug": "minimum_sufficient_solution"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is overbuilding before sufficiency has been defined. A project, process, policy, product, or intervention grows by accretion: one feature for a possible user, one approval for a possible failure, one extra document for a possible handoff, one dashboard for a possible report. Each addition may sound reasonable in isolation, but the combined solution becomes slower, harder to use, harder to maintain, and harder to change.\n\nThe deeper tension is that incomplete solutions can fail, but excessive solutions also fail. Overbuilt solutions consume implementation capacity, confuse users, create maintenance obligations, and delay the moment when the core need is actually served.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A solution effort expands beyond the essential requirement, increasing cost, delay, maintenance burden, implementation risk, user confusion, or governance overhead before the extra scope has earned its place."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P079-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a solution effort and its focal requirement.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A team is developing a solution around a core requirement.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail unresolved or changing essential requirements.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The core requirement is not yet stable.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the premature ordering, not additions after stabilization.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The team adds scope before the core requirement becomes stable.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve premature feature addition.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The added scope consists of features.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve premature process-step addition.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The added scope consists of process steps.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve premature control addition.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The added scope consists of controls.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch must preserve premature deliverable addition.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The added scope consists of deliverables.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A team adds features, process steps, controls, or deliverables before the core requirement is stable.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A team expands solution scope before stabilizing the core requirement.", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P079-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Second-system overengineering requires a successful constrained predecessor and lifted constraints, neither of which this condition entails.", "slug": "second_system_effect"}], "residual_id": "r:minimum_sufficient_solution:b041_a02_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b041_a02_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The team is adding features, process steps, controls, or deliverables before the core requirement is stable. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The team is adding features, process steps, controls, or deliverables before the core requirement is stable."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Second-system overengineering requires a successful constrained predecessor and lifted constraints, neither of which this condition entails.", "slug": "second_system_effect"}], "normalized_requirement": "Features, process steps, controls, or deliverables are added before the core requirement is stable.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Features, process steps, controls, or deliverables are added before the core requirement is stable.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A backlog of postponed ambitions floods the successor after constraints lift, producing overengineering and delayed or failed delivery.", "role_mapping": "Speculative needs -> postponed ambitions; delivery -> successor system.", "slug": "second_system_effect", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b041_a02_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Delivery is delayed by speculative future needs. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Delivery is delayed by speculative future needs."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Second-System Effect", "one_liner": "When load-bearing constraints are lifted but capability is retained, a stockpile of postponed ambitions floods the successor, producing overengineering.", "page_ref": "prime:second_system_effect", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Speculative needs -> postponed ambitions; delivery -> successor system.", "slug": "second_system_effect", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A backlog of postponed ambitions floods the successor after constraints lift, producing overengineering and delayed or failed delivery."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Delivery is delayed by implementation of speculative future needs.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P080-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the stakeholder-request role and the core-need reference used to evaluate it, without requiring the request to differ substantively from that need.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A stakeholder supplies a request, and a core need is available as the relevant test.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail the request-to-requirement status conversion, not merely collection or consideration of requests.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The stakeholder request is treated or promoted as a requirement.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve default promotion rather than an exceptional, selectively justified promotion.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Promotion is the default treatment of stakeholder requests.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail absence of prior core-need testing before requirement status is assigned.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The request is not first tested against the core need.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "A stakeholder request is promoted to a requirement by default without first being tested against the core need.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "stakeholder requests become requirements by default without prior core-need testing", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P080-C01-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Need-solution alignment can reject or accept requests and does not entail automatic promotion.", "slug": "need_solution_alignment"}], "residual_id": "r:minimum_sufficient_solution:b041_a02_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b041_a02_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Stakeholder requests are treated as requirements by default. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Stakeholder requests are treated as requirements by default."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Need-solution alignment can reject or accept requests and does not entail automatic promotion.", "slug": "need_solution_alignment"}], "normalized_requirement": "Stakeholder requests are promoted to requirements by default rather than tested against the core need.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Stakeholder requests are promoted to requirements by default rather than tested against the core need.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Accidental complexity is precisely removable difficulty introduced by representation, tooling, workflow, or approach rather than by the problem itself.", "role_mapping": "Nonessential complexity -> accidental complexity; core requirement -> essential difficulty; drag -> added approach burden.", "slug": "accidental_vs_essential_complexity", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b041_a02_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Nonessential complexity is creating operational or cognitive drag. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Nonessential complexity is creating operational or cognitive drag."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Accidental Vs Essential Complexity", "one_liner": "A system's complexity splits into the irreducible difficulty of the problem and the removable difficulty introduced by the chosen approach.", "page_ref": "prime:accidental_vs_essential_complexity", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Nonessential complexity -> accidental complexity; core requirement -> essential difficulty; drag -> added approach burden.", "slug": "accidental_vs_essential_complexity", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Accidental complexity is precisely removable difficulty introduced by representation, tooling, workflow, or approach rather than by the problem itself."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Removable complexity introduced by the chosen solution approach creates operational or cognitive drag.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The system needs a usable solution under limited time, budget, attention, or implementation capacity.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful under time, budget, attention, or implementation constraints. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: The system needs a usable solution under limited time, budget, attention, or implementation capacity. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The system needs a usable solution under limited time, budget, attention, or implementation capacity.", "It is especially useful under time, budget, attention, or implementation constraints."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The system needs a usable solution under limited time, budget, attention, or implementation capacity."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 41, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-041", "ledger_sha256": "672ab11f3edf16b49307a391eafbdd179b6f11ca9c2b493acd29ca2ad6b6e13e"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Minimum Viable Learning Release", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:minimum_viable_learning_release", "slug": "minimum_viable_learning_release"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is premature buildout. A solution expands before its essential assumptions have encountered reality. Teams add features, integrations, governance layers, polish, or scale because they feel necessary, impressive, or politically reassuring. Yet the most important question remains unresolved: does the core solution meet a real need under actual conditions?\n\nThis creates a familiar trap. By the time the team learns that the need was misunderstood, the workflow does not fit, or the implementation burden is too high, the design has become expensive to change. The organization then defends the investment rather than learning from the release.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A solution expands in scope, polish, infrastructure, or institutional commitment before its core need, demand, user behavior, workflow fit, or operating logic has been validated in a real context."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "An MVP is built to test key assumptions about user need through a real release rather than pre-launch completeness.", "role_mapping": "Core need -> key assumption; unvalidated -> learning objective; real use -> rapid launch.", "slug": "minimum_viable_product_mvp", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b041_a03_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The core need is plausible but still unvalidated. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The core need is plausible but still unvalidated."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Minimum Viable Product (MVP)", "one_liner": "Minimum viable product.", "page_ref": "prime:minimum_viable_product_mvp", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Core need -> key assumption; unvalidated -> learning objective; real use -> rapid launch.", "slug": "minimum_viable_product_mvp", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "An MVP is built to test key assumptions about user need through a real release rather than pre-launch completeness."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The core user need or operating assumption is plausible but not yet validated in real use.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Small individually defensible additions are evaluated against a drifting baseline and cumulatively expand the original perimeter.", "role_mapping": "Stakeholder additions -> incremental scope requests; expanding scope -> ratcheting boundary.", "slug": "scope_creep", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b041_a03_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Scope is expanding because stakeholders are adding desirable but nonessential features. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Scope is expanding because stakeholders are adding desirable but nonessential features."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Scope Creep", "one_liner": "A perimeter ratchets outward through small additions each judged against a drifting current baseline rather than the original charter, with no owner of the trajectory.", "page_ref": "prime:scope_creep", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Stakeholder additions -> incremental scope requests; expanding scope -> ratcheting boundary.", "slug": "scope_creep", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Small individually defensible additions are evaluated against a drifting baseline and cumulatively expand the original perimeter."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A stream of individually desirable but nonessential additions ratchets the release scope outward.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Commitment and intervention cost rise before deployment supplies enough consequence information, narrowing revisability.", "role_mapping": "Next step -> commitment accumulation; validation evidence -> rising information curve; lock-in -> intervention-cost curve.", "slug": "collingridge_dilemma", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b041_a03_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The next step would create sunk cost, political lock-in, technical debt, or operational dependency. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The next step would create sunk cost, political lock-in, technical debt, or operational dependency."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Collingridge Dilemma", "one_liner": "Information about a system's consequences rises as the cost of changing it rises, so the window where intervention is both informed and feasible may be narrow or absent.", "page_ref": "prime:collingridge_dilemma", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Next step -> commitment accumulation; validation evidence -> rising information curve; lock-in -> intervention-cost curve.", "slug": "collingridge_dilemma", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Commitment and intervention cost rise before deployment supplies enough consequence information, narrowing revisability."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The next commitment increases lock-in or switching cost before real-world consequence information is available.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Prototyping can continue to answer the relevant question; its use does not entail evidence exhaustion.", "slug": "design_prototyping"}], "residual_id": "r:minimum_viable_learning_release:b041_a03_c5", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b041_a03_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Feedback from mockups or interviews is no longer enough. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Feedback from mockups or interviews is no longer enough."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Prototyping can continue to answer the relevant question; its use does not entail evidence exhaustion.", "slug": "design_prototyping"}], "normalized_requirement": "Mockups or interviews no longer supply evidence sufficient for the next design decision.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Mockups or interviews no longer supply evidence sufficient for the next design decision.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The team can deliver a narrow real version before full buildout.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when a team is tempted to build the full version before the basic value proposition, demand, workflow fit, or implementation logic has survived real use. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: The team can deliver a narrow real version before full buildout. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The team can deliver a narrow real version before full buildout.", "Use this archetype when a team is tempted to build the full version before the basic value proposition, demand, workflow fit, or implementation logic has survived real use."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "The team can deliver a narrow real version before full buildout."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 41, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-041", "ledger_sha256": "672ab11f3edf16b49307a391eafbdd179b6f11ca9c2b493acd29ca2ad6b6e13e"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Missingness-Aware Estimator Selection", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:missingness_aware_estimator_selection", "slug": "missingness_aware_estimator_selection"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "An analysis must estimate a target quantity from incomplete data, but the chosen estimator may be valid only under a missingness mechanism that has not been stated, checked, or sensitivity-tested.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "An analysis must estimate a target quantity from incomplete data, but the chosen estimator may be valid only under a missingness mechanism that has not been stated, checked, or sensitivity-tested."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The taxonomy presupposes observed data, missing data, and a missingness indicator.", "role_mapping": "Missing values -> Y_mis; observed values -> Y_obs; absence -> R=0.", "slug": "missing_data_mechanisms_mcar_mar_mnar", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b041_a04_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Outcomes, covariates, units, events, waves, readings, or follow-up measurements are missing or partially observed. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Outcomes, covariates, units, events, waves, readings, or follow-up measurements are missing or partially observed."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Missing Data Mechanisms (MCAR, MAR, MNAR)", "one_liner": "MCAR, MAR, MNAR.", "page_ref": "prime:missing_data_mechanisms_mcar_mar_mnar", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Missing values -> Y_mis; observed values -> Y_obs; absence -> R=0.", "slug": "missing_data_mechanisms_mcar_mar_mnar", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The taxonomy presupposes observed data, missing data, and a missingness indicator."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Some outcomes, covariates, units, events, waves, readings, or follow-up values are unobserved.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P080-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve missingness patterns and the contexts across which those patterns are compared.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Incomplete observations have missingness patterns indexed by two or more relevant contexts.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail either an established cross-context pattern difference or the live possibility of such a difference, not merely missing data in one undifferentiated population.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The missingness pattern differs or can differ between the indexed contexts.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate may preserve an observed difference or a possible difference; it must not exclude either source-authorized epistemic status.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Cross-context difference may be already established or may remain only possible.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "A missingness pattern differs or may differ across relevant observational contexts.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "missingness pattern is or may be heterogeneous across observational contexts", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P080-C02-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A missingness mechanism can be homogeneous across all listed strata.", "slug": "missing_data_mechanisms_mcar_mar_mnar"}], "residual_id": "r:missingness_aware_estimator_selection:b041_a04_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b041_a04_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The missingness pattern may differ across groups, time periods, treatment arms, devices, locations, or response channels. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The missingness pattern may differ across groups, time periods, treatment arms, devices, locations, or response channels."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "I tried to hold the ascertainment pattern constant across contexts, but the exact record requires non-random attenuation that varies by demographics, geography, access, severity, and changing surveillance conditions.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Outbreak Underascertainment", "one_liner": "The surveillance failure in which recorded case counts fall systematically below the true count because a multi-stage detection pipeline — symptom expression, care-seeking, testing, confirmation, reporting — filters cases with biased attenuation at each layer.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:outbreak_underascertainment", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "outbreak_underascertainment"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "outbreak_underascertainment", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P080-C02-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every complete outbreak-underascertainment instance contains incomplete cases and actual cross-context heterogeneity in the filtering pattern, satisfying the sole DNF branch without qualification."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Missingness patterns differ or may differ across groups, periods, arms, devices, locations, or channels.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P080-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve an incomplete-data analysis and a contemplated handling method.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An analysis with incomplete data is considering a method for handling missing observations.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail actual consideration of the method, not merely its abstract availability.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The handling method is under consideration for the analysis.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail absence of an explicit justification tying method validity to the missingness mechanism.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "No explicit missingness-mechanism justification accompanies the contemplated method.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by consideration of complete-case analysis.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The contemplated method is complete-case analysis.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by consideration of listwise deletion.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The contemplated method is listwise deletion.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by consideration of a simple fill-in method.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The contemplated method is simple fill-in.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by consideration of default imputation.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The contemplated method is default imputation.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by consideration of a software-selected default method.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The contemplated method is a software default.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "An incomplete-data handling method is being considered without explicit justification by a missingness mechanism.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "incomplete-data method considered without missingness-mechanism justification", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P080-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Imputation can be explicitly justified under a stated model; it does not entail default or unjustified use.", "slug": "imputation"}], "residual_id": "r:missingness_aware_estimator_selection:b041_a04_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b041_a04_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Complete-case analysis, listwise deletion, simple fill-in, default imputation, or software defaults are being considered without explicit mechanism justification. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Complete-case analysis, listwise deletion, simple fill-in, default imputation, or software defaults are being considered without explicit mechanism justification."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Imputation can be explicitly justified under a stated model; it does not entail default or unjustified use.", "slug": "imputation"}], "normalized_requirement": "Deletion, complete-case analysis, simple filling, or software-default imputation is considered without mechanism justification.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Deletion, complete-case analysis, simple filling, or software-default imputation is considered without mechanism justification.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P080-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve both the target estimand and the incomplete cases whose treatment can affect it.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An incomplete-data analysis has a target estimand and incomplete cases subject to a handling choice.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail the handling choice as a condition capable of changing the target quantity, not only estimator variance.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The handling of incomplete cases can change the target estimand.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the conditional possibility of change without requiring that every such handling choice changes the estimand.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Estimand change is possible rather than inevitable.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by exclusion of incomplete cases.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Incomplete cases are excluded.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by differential weighting of incomplete cases.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Incomplete cases are differentially weighted.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "The target estimand can change when incomplete cases are excluded or differentially weighted.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "incomplete-case handling can alter the target estimand", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P080-C04-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Under MCAR, complete-case analysis can preserve the estimand; a change is not universal.", "slug": "missing_data_mechanisms_mcar_mar_mnar"}], "residual_id": "r:missingness_aware_estimator_selection:b041_a04_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b041_a04_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The target estimand could change if incomplete cases are excluded or differentially weighted. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The target estimand could change if incomplete cases are excluded or differentially weighted."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Under MCAR, complete-case analysis can preserve the estimand; a change is not universal.", "slug": "missing_data_mechanisms_mcar_mar_mnar"}], "normalized_requirement": "Excluding or differentially weighting incomplete cases can change the target estimand.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Excluding or differentially weighting incomplete cases can change the target estimand.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The taxonomy includes MCAR, where missingness is independent of observed and unobserved values.", "slug": "missing_data_mechanisms_mcar_mar_mnar"}], "residual_id": "r:missingness_aware_estimator_selection:b041_a04_c5", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b041_a04_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The absence process may depend on observed covariates, prior values, administrative rules, device failures, respondent behavior, or unobserved outcomes. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The absence process may depend on observed covariates, prior values, administrative rules, device failures, respondent behavior, or unobserved outcomes."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The taxonomy includes MCAR, where missingness is independent of observed and unobserved values.", "slug": "missing_data_mechanisms_mcar_mar_mnar"}], "normalized_requirement": "The absence process can depend on observed covariates, prior values, rules, failures, behavior, or unobserved outcomes.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The absence process can depend on observed covariates, prior values, rules, failures, behavior, or unobserved outcomes.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A result will inform a high-stakes claim, policy, product decision, scientific inference, safety conclusion, or resource allocation.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: A result will inform a high-stakes claim, policy, product decision, scientific inference, safety conclusion, or resource allocation. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A result will inform a high-stakes claim, policy, product decision, scientific inference, safety conclusion, or resource allocation."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "A result will inform a high-stakes claim, policy, product decision, scientific inference, safety conclusion, or resource allocation."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 41, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-041", "ledger_sha256": "672ab11f3edf16b49307a391eafbdd179b6f11ca9c2b493acd29ca2ad6b6e13e"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Misuse-Resistant Affordance Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:misuse_resistant_affordance_design", "slug": "misuse_resistant_affordance_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 1, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A harmful, erroneous, abusive, or off-label action remains available and low-friction inside the ordinary action space, while prevention depends on vigilance, rules, detection, deterrence, or punishment after the fact. Broad restrictions can reduce harm, but they also burden legitimate users and create workarounds.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A harmful, erroneous, abusive, or off-label action remains available and low-friction inside the ordinary action space, while prevention depends on vigilance, rules, detection, deterrence, or punishment after the fact. Broad restrictions can reduce harm, but they also burden legitimate users and create workarounds."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The pattern presupposes a distinguished misuse path and legitimate path in the environment's affordance set.", "role_mapping": "Harmful path -> misuse path; ordinary action set -> affordances and defaults.", "slug": "designed_out_misuse", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "Error proofing begins from an identified repeatable or high-consequence error mode available in a process or design.", "role_mapping": "Misuse or error path -> target error mode; users -> process actors.", "slug": "error_proofing_poka_yoke", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b041_a05_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A predictable misuse or error path is materially available to ordinary users, operators, customers, insiders, or adversarial actors. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A predictable misuse or error path is materially available to ordinary users, operators, customers, insiders, or adversarial actors."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Designed-Out Misuse", "one_liner": "Affordances and defaults are arranged so the misuse path is costly or impossible while the legitimate path stays easy, preventing harm before enforcement has to act.", "page_ref": "prime:designed_out_misuse", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Harmful path -> misuse path; ordinary action set -> affordances and defaults.", "slug": "designed_out_misuse", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The pattern presupposes a distinguished misuse path and legitimate path in the environment's affordance set."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Error Proofing (Poka-Yoke)", "one_liner": "Error prevention.", "page_ref": "prime:error_proofing_poka_yoke", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Misuse or error path -> target error mode; users -> process actors.", "slug": "error_proofing_poka_yoke", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Error proofing begins from an identified repeatable or high-consequence error mode available in a process or design."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A predictable misuse or error path remains materially available in the ordinary action set.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P080-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O9"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the organization and harmful-path roles.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An organization manages an available harmful action path.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail reliance on the listed kind of control, not merely its optional presence alongside structural prevention.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The organization relies on a nonstructural control to prevent or deter use of the harmful path.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve structural redesign as a feasible alternative rather than an impossible hypothetical.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The harmful path could instead be structurally redesigned.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by reliance on training.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The relied-on control is training.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by reliance on policy.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The relied-on control is policy.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by reliance on signs.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The relied-on control is signage.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by reliance on warnings.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The relied-on control is warning.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by reliance on monitoring.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The relied-on control is monitoring.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by reliance on punishment.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "The relied-on control is punishment.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "An organization relies on a behavioral, procedural, monitoring, or punitive control even though the harmful path could be structurally redesigned.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "organization relies on nonstructural control despite feasible harmful-path redesign", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P080-C05-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Designed-out misuse can be chosen before any reliance on policy or punishment exists.", "slug": "designed_out_misuse"}], "residual_id": "r:misuse_resistant_affordance_design:b041_a05_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b041_a05_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The organization is relying on training, policy, signs, warnings, monitoring, or punishment even though the harmful path could be structurally redesigned. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The organization is relying on training, policy, signs, warnings, monitoring, or punishment even though the harmful path could be structurally redesigned."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Designed-out misuse can be chosen before any reliance on policy or punishment exists.", "slug": "designed_out_misuse"}], "normalized_requirement": "The organization relies on training, policy, warnings, monitoring, or punishment although structural redesign is possible.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The organization relies on training, policy, warnings, monitoring, or punishment although structural redesign is possible.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Asymmetric treatment at the affordance-and-default layer burdens misuse while preserving the legitimate path.", "role_mapping": "Point of action -> environment; defaults and shapes -> affordance set; distinction -> normative path partition.", "slug": "designed_out_misuse", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b041_a05_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Misuse occurs at a point of action where defaults, permissions, sequences, shapes, labels, or interface affordances can be changed. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Misuse occurs at a point of action where defaults, permissions, sequences, shapes, labels, or interface affordances can be changed."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Designed-Out Misuse", "one_liner": "Affordances and defaults are arranged so the misuse path is costly or impossible while the legitimate path stays easy, preventing harm before enforcement has to act.", "page_ref": "prime:designed_out_misuse", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Point of action -> environment; defaults and shapes -> affordance set; distinction -> normative path partition.", "slug": "designed_out_misuse", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Asymmetric treatment at the affordance-and-default layer burdens misuse while preserving the legitimate path."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Defaults, permissions, sequences, shapes, labels, or affordances at the point of action can distinguish legitimate use from misuse.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P080-C06", "dnf": [], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [], "predicate": "There is evidence of repeated bypass, support burden, near misses, abuse, fraud, accidental error, unsafe shortcutting, or policy evasion.", "resolution": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RESIDUAL", "semantic_scope": "NON_ABSTRACTION", "structural_head": "repeated harmful or evasive outcomes have been observed", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P080-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The misuse path can be designed out prospectively before repeated incidents occur.", "slug": "designed_out_misuse"}], "residual_id": "r:misuse_resistant_affordance_design:b041_a05_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b041_a05_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: There is evidence of repeated bypass, support burden, near misses, abuse, fraud, accidental error, unsafe shortcutting, or policy evasion. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["There is evidence of repeated bypass, support burden, near misses, abuse, fraud, accidental error, unsafe shortcutting, or policy evasion."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RECLASSIFIED", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 1, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The misuse path can be designed out prospectively before repeated incidents occur.", "slug": "designed_out_misuse"}], "normalized_requirement": "Repeated bypass, support burden, near misses, abuse, fraud, error, shortcutting, or evasion has been observed.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RECLASSIFIED", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later candidate-blind atomization classified this remainder as a threshold, parameter, materiality test, or other non-abstraction rather than a catalog gap."}, "predicate": "Repeated bypass, support burden, near misses, abuse, fraud, error, shortcutting, or evasion has been observed.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The legitimate path can be made easier, clearer, or more available than the misuse path without blocking core work.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The system needs openness, usability, and legitimate adaptation, but the same available action space also admits predictable misuse. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: The legitimate path can be made easier, clearer, or more available than the misuse path without blocking core work. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The legitimate path can be made easier, clearer, or more available than the misuse path without blocking core work.", "The system needs openness, usability, and legitimate adaptation, but the same available action space also admits predictable misuse."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "The legitimate path can be made easier, clearer, or more available than the misuse path without blocking core work."}, {"display_text": "Prevented harm is significant enough to justify added friction, but blanket denial would be disproportionate or inaccessible.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: Prevented harm is significant enough to justify added friction, but blanket denial would be disproportionate or inaccessible. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Prevented harm is significant enough to justify added friction, but blanket denial would be disproportionate or inaccessible."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Prevented harm is significant enough to justify added friction, but blanket denial would be disproportionate or inaccessible."}, {"display_text": "The system must accommodate legitimate exceptions without converting exceptions into a new uncontrolled channel.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: The system must accommodate legitimate exceptions without converting exceptions into a new uncontrolled channel. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The system must accommodate legitimate exceptions without converting exceptions into a new uncontrolled channel."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "The system must accommodate legitimate exceptions without converting exceptions into a new uncontrolled channel."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 41, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-041", "ledger_sha256": "672ab11f3edf16b49307a391eafbdd179b6f11ca9c2b493acd29ca2ad6b6e13e"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Mixed-Stability Saddle Navigation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:mixed_stability_saddle_navigation", "slug": "mixed_stability_saddle_navigation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 7 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 7}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system sits near a mixed-stability equilibrium or transition region and is managed as though it were uniformly stable, uniformly unstable, or simply on a one-dimensional path. Because stability is directional, ordinary correction rules create false confidence: some deviations self-correct, others amplify, and small unobserved movements can cross a boundary into a different basin, strategic regime, optimization trajectory, or organizational outcome.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system sits near a mixed-stability equilibrium or transition region and is managed as though it were uniformly stable, uniformly unstable, or simply on a one-dimensional path. Because stability is directional, ordinary correction rules create false confidence: some deviations self-correct, others amplify, and small unobserved movements can cross a boundary into a different basin, strategic regime, optimization trajectory, or organizational outcome."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "An equilibrium has a stable manifold on which deviations decay and an unstable manifold on which they grow.", "role_mapping": "Calm subset -> stable directions; balanced state -> equilibrium.", "slug": "saddle_point", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b041_a06_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Local behavior appears calm or balanced, but only for a subset of directions, variables, stakeholders, or perturbations. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Local behavior appears calm or balanced, but only for a subset of directions, variables, stakeholders, or perturbations."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Saddle Point", "one_liner": "An equilibrium stable in some directions and unstable in others.", "page_ref": "prime:saddle_point", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Calm subset -> stable directions; balanced state -> equilibrium.", "slug": "saddle_point", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "An equilibrium has a stable manifold on which deviations decay and an unstable manifold on which they grow."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A locally balanced state is stable only along a subset of perturbation directions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Mixed-sign local dynamics make perturbations decay on stable axes and grow on unstable axes.", "role_mapping": "Dimensions -> eigendirections; amplify/dissipate -> unstable/stable response.", "slug": "saddle_point", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b041_a06_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Small changes in one dimension produce large, hard-to-reverse downstream shifts while changes in other dimensions dissipate. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Small changes in one dimension produce large, hard-to-reverse downstream shifts while changes in other dimensions dissipate."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Saddle Point", "one_liner": "An equilibrium stable in some directions and unstable in others.", "page_ref": "prime:saddle_point", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Dimensions -> eigendirections; amplify/dissipate -> unstable/stable response.", "slug": "saddle_point", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Mixed-sign local dynamics make perturbations decay on stable axes and grow on unstable axes."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Small perturbations amplify along some axes and dissipate along others.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A saddle point can be a static mathematical feature with no consequential choice or multiple practical futures.", "slug": "saddle_point"}], "residual_id": "r:mixed_stability_saddle_navigation:b041_a06_c3", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b041_a06_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A decision, negotiation, model, process, or policy sits near a knife-edge between two or more futures. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A decision, negotiation, model, process, or policy sits near a knife-edge between two or more futures."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A saddle point can be a static mathematical feature with no consequential choice or multiple practical futures.", "slug": "saddle_point"}], "normalized_requirement": "A consequential choice sits near a knife-edge separating two or more futures.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A consequential choice sits near a knife-edge separating two or more futures.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P080-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the system, desired destination, and unstable intermediate-region roles.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A focal system has a desired destination state and an unstable intermediate region.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail the unstable region as an intermediate on the route to the destination.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The system's path to the desired state passes through the unstable region.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve path necessity rather than an optional route that can be avoided.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Traversing the unstable region is necessary to reach the desired state.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "A system must traverse an unstable region to reach a desired state.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "path to a desired state necessarily crosses an unstable region", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P080-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A saddle can be avoided or observed without being a required route to a desired basin.", "slug": "saddle_point"}], "residual_id": "r:mixed_stability_saddle_navigation:b041_a06_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b041_a06_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A system must pass through an unstable region to reach a desired basin, capability level, market position, or policy regime. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A system must pass through an unstable region to reach a desired basin, capability level, market position, or policy regime."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A saddle can be avoided or observed without being a required route to a desired basin.", "slug": "saddle_point"}], "normalized_requirement": "The system must traverse an unstable region to reach a desired basin or regime.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The system must traverse an unstable region to reach a desired basin or regime.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P080-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the search-process and focal-region roles.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An iterative search process operates near a candidate stationary or flat-looking region.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail recurrent stalling rather than one isolated pause.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The search process stalls near the region repeatedly.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve both the deceptive flat appearance and the actual saddle-not-optimum classification.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The region looks flat but is actually a saddle rather than a useful optimum.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by an optimization process.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The recurrently stalled process is optimization.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by a learning process.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The recurrently stalled process is learning.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "An optimization or learning process repeatedly stalls near a flat-looking region that is actually a saddle rather than a useful optimum.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "iterative search repeatedly stalls near a deceptively flat saddle", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P080-C08-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A saddle need not trap an optimizer or be mistaken for an optimum.", "slug": "saddle_point"}], "residual_id": "r:mixed_stability_saddle_navigation:b041_a06_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b041_a06_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Optimization or learning repeatedly gets stuck near flat-looking regions that are actually saddles rather than useful optima. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Optimization or learning repeatedly gets stuck near flat-looking regions that are actually saddles rather than useful optima."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A saddle need not trap an optimizer or be mistaken for an optimum.", "slug": "saddle_point"}], "normalized_requirement": "Optimization or learning repeatedly stalls near a saddle mistaken for a useful optimum.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Optimization or learning repeatedly stalls near a saddle mistaken for a useful optimum.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P080-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve an intervention directed at stability or equilibrium and perturbations affecting that system.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A prior intervention attempts to manage system stability or equilibrium under perturbation.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail actual intervention failure, not only possible weakness.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The prior intervention failed.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve undifferentiated treatment across all perturbations rather than a limited subset.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The intervention treated all perturbations as equivalent.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail the undifferentiated treatment as a cause of failure rather than an incidental design feature.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Treating the perturbations as equivalent caused the intervention to fail.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "A prior stability or equilibrium intervention failed because it treated all perturbation directions as equivalent.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "intervention fails by treating directionally distinct perturbations as equivalent", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P080-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A saddle may be diagnosed before any prior intervention fails.", "slug": "saddle_point"}], "residual_id": "r:mixed_stability_saddle_navigation:b041_a06_c7", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b041_a06_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A previous stability or equilibrium intervention failed because it treated all perturbations as equivalent. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A previous stability or equilibrium intervention failed because it treated all perturbations as equivalent."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A saddle may be diagnosed before any prior intervention fails.", "slug": "saddle_point"}], "normalized_requirement": "A prior stability intervention failed because it treated all perturbation directions as equivalent.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A prior stability intervention failed because it treated all perturbation directions as equivalent.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Intervention is direction-asymmetric: identical magnitude stabilizes on one manifold and destabilizes on another.", "role_mapping": "Direction -> stable or unstable manifold; boundary distance -> saddle-path proximity.", "slug": "saddle_point", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b041_a06_c8", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The safe move depends more on direction and boundary distance than on scalar magnitude alone. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The safe move depends more on direction and boundary distance than on scalar magnitude alone."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Saddle Point", "one_liner": "An equilibrium stable in some directions and unstable in others.", "page_ref": "prime:saddle_point", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Direction -> stable or unstable manifold; boundary distance -> saddle-path proximity.", "slug": "saddle_point", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Intervention is direction-asymmetric: identical magnitude stabilizes on one manifold and destabilizes on another."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Response sign and basin-boundary distance matter more than perturbation magnitude alone.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [8], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Teams disagree about whether the situation is stable because each sees a different axis of response.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Teams disagree about whether the situation is stable because each sees a different axis of response. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Teams disagree about whether the situation is stable because each sees a different axis of response."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Teams disagree about whether the situation is stable because each sees a different axis of response."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 41, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-041", "ledger_sha256": "672ab11f3edf16b49307a391eafbdd179b6f11ca9c2b493acd29ca2ad6b6e13e"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Mobile-Defect Reconfiguration", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:mobile_defect_reconfiguration", "slug": "mobile_defect_reconfiguration"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A large ordered or coupled substrate must change, but direct simultaneous rearrangement is too costly, unsafe, unavailable, or incompatible with continuity. Local change is possible, yet each local move temporarily creates a mismatch with neighboring state. Without a governed mobile defect, the system either remains locked, attempts a risky global cutover, or accumulates uncontrolled local inconsistency.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A large ordered or coupled substrate must change, but direct simultaneous rearrangement is too costly, unsafe, unavailable, or incompatible with continuity. Local change is possible, yet each local move temporarily creates a mismatch with neighboring state. Without a governed mobile defect, the system either remains locked, attempts a risky global cutover, or accumulates uncontrolled local inconsistency."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Large-scale substrate change is produced by integrating local defect motion instead of rearranging every unit at once.", "role_mapping": "Coupled units -> ordered substrate; cumulative change -> global deformation.", "slug": "dislocation_motion", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b041_a07_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The target configuration requires cumulative change across many coupled units. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The target configuration requires cumulative change across many coupled units."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Dislocation Motion", "one_liner": "Large-scale change of an ordered medium achieved by propagating a localised defect rather than rearranging every unit at once.", "page_ref": "prime:dislocation_motion", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Coupled units -> ordered substrate; cumulative change -> global deformation.", "slug": "dislocation_motion", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Large-scale substrate change is produced by integrating local defect motion instead of rearranging every unit at once."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A target configuration requires cumulative change across many coupled units whose simultaneous rearrangement is prohibitive.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The localized defect advances through low-force changes to one small neighborhood at a time.", "role_mapping": "Adjacent changes -> local defect steps; acceptable cost -> low-force mechanism.", "slug": "dislocation_motion", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b041_a07_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Local change is possible, yet each local move temporarily creates a mismatch with neighboring state. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Only local or adjacent state changes are feasible at acceptable cost or risk.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Only local or adjacent state changes are feasible at acceptable cost or risk.", "Local change is possible, yet each local move temporarily creates a mismatch with neighboring state."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Dislocation Motion", "one_liner": "Large-scale change of an ordered medium achieved by propagating a localised defect rather than rearranging every unit at once.", "page_ref": "prime:dislocation_motion", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Adjacent changes -> local defect steps; acceptable cost -> low-force mechanism.", "slug": "dislocation_motion", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The localized defect advances through low-force changes to one small neighborhood at a time."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Only local or adjacent state changes are feasible at acceptable cost or risk.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A localized defect is the mobile seam that propagates through the ordered medium.", "role_mapping": "Bounded mismatch -> localized defect; movement -> sweep front.", "slug": "dislocation_motion", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b041_a07_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A bounded mismatch, vacancy, seam, work zone, or compatibility window can be moved through the substrate. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A bounded mismatch, vacancy, seam, work zone, or compatibility window can be moved through the substrate."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Dislocation Motion", "one_liner": "Large-scale change of an ordered medium achieved by propagating a localised defect rather than rearranging every unit at once.", "page_ref": "prime:dislocation_motion", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Bounded mismatch -> localized defect; movement -> sweep front.", "slug": "dislocation_motion", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A localized defect is the mobile seam that propagates through the ordered medium."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A bounded mismatch, vacancy, seam, work zone, or compatibility window can move through the substrate.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Each local step leaves permanent, substrate-altering but non-destructive cumulative change behind the front.", "role_mapping": "Region behind -> swept substrate; verified change -> accumulated deformation.", "slug": "dislocation_motion", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b041_a07_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The region behind the moving front can be independently verified and stabilized. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The region behind the moving front can be independently verified and stabilized."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Dislocation Motion", "one_liner": "Large-scale change of an ordered medium achieved by propagating a localised defect rather than rearranging every unit at once.", "page_ref": "prime:dislocation_motion", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Region behind -> swept substrate; verified change -> accumulated deformation.", "slug": "dislocation_motion", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Each local step leaves permanent, substrate-altering but non-destructive cumulative change behind the front."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The region behind the moving defect is cumulatively changed and can be stabilized or verified independently.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Protected functions must continue during most or all of the transition.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this deployment constraint: Protected functions must continue during most or all of the transition. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Protected functions must continue during most or all of the transition."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Protected functions must continue during most or all of the transition."}, {"display_text": "A safe arrest condition and terminal sink or closure process can be defined.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: A safe arrest condition and terminal sink or closure process can be defined. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A safe arrest condition and terminal sink or closure process can be defined."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "A safe arrest condition and terminal sink or closure process can be defined."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 41, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-041", "ledger_sha256": "672ab11f3edf16b49307a391eafbdd179b6f11ca9c2b493acd29ca2ad6b6e13e"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Mobilization Capacity through Dense Relationships", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:mobilization_capacity_through_dense_relationships", "slug": "mobilization_capacity_through_dense_relationships"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 1, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is latent capacity without mobilization architecture. A dense network has people, trust, history, reciprocity, and shared norms, but those assets remain unconverted. Requests diffuse unevenly. Commitments stay vague. Needs and offers live in scattered conversations. Trusted people become bottlenecks. Some participants may feel pressured or unsafe.\n\nThe core tension is that the same density that makes action fast also makes failure fast. Dense ties can spread verification, commitment, and accountability, but they can also spread rumor, pressure, overload, and clique exclusion.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A community, team, movement, or contributor network contains trust, reciprocity, and relational reach, but that capacity remains latent or poorly directed when urgent collective action is needed. Requests diffuse slowly or unevenly, commitments stay vague, resources are not matched to needs, central actors become overloaded, and participants are exposed to coercion or burnout."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P080-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve urgency or a bounded response window rather than an indefinitely deferrable condition.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The initiating condition is time-sensitive.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve distributed action rather than action by one central actor alone.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The required response consists of action distributed across multiple actors or loci.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail that distributed action is required, not merely useful or possible.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The initiating condition necessitates the distributed response.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by a time-sensitive event.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The initiating condition is an event.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by a time-sensitive opportunity.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The initiating condition is an opportunity.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by a time-sensitive threat.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The initiating condition is a threat.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by a time-sensitive need shared across actors.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The initiating condition is a shared need.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A time-sensitive event, opportunity, threat, or shared need requires distributed action.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "time-sensitive condition requires distributed action", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P080-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Mobilization can occur on a planned schedule without urgency or threat.", "slug": "mobilization"}], "residual_id": "r:mobilization_capacity_through_dense_relationships:b041_a08_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b041_a08_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A time-sensitive event, opportunity, threat, or shared need requires distributed action. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A time-sensitive event, opportunity, threat, or shared need requires distributed action."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Mobilization can occur on a planned schedule without urgency or threat.", "slug": "mobilization"}], "normalized_requirement": "A time-sensitive threat, opportunity, event, or shared need requires distributed action.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A time-sensitive threat, opportunity, event, or shared need requires distributed action.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Resources accessible through relationships, grounded in networks, trust, reciprocity, and collective-action capacity, are constitutive.", "role_mapping": "Relationship ties -> network; trust and reciprocity -> social-capital foundation; brokers -> bridging ties.", "slug": "social_capital", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b041_a08_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The affected group already has meaningful relationship ties, trusted brokers, or recurring interaction channels. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The affected group already has meaningful relationship ties, trusted brokers, or recurring interaction channels."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Social Capital", "one_liner": "Value of relationships.", "page_ref": "prime:social_capital", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Relationship ties -> network; trust and reciprocity -> social-capital foundation; brokers -> bridging ties.", "slug": "social_capital", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Resources accessible through relationships, grounded in networks, trust, reciprocity, and collective-action capacity, are constitutive."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The group has relationship-based resources, trust, reciprocity, brokers, or recurring interaction channels.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P080-C11", "dnf": [], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [], "predicate": "Formal authority or mass broadcast alone is too slow for the required action.", "resolution": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RESIDUAL", "semantic_scope": "NON_ABSTRACTION", "structural_head": "formal authority or mass broadcast is too slow", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P080-C11-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P080-C11", "dnf": [], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [], "predicate": "Formal authority or mass broadcast alone is too generic for the required action.", "resolution": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RESIDUAL", "semantic_scope": "NON_ABSTRACTION", "structural_head": "formal authority or mass broadcast is too generic", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P080-C11-U2"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P080-C11", "dnf": [], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [], "predicate": "Formal authority or mass broadcast alone is insufficiently trusted for the required action.", "resolution": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RESIDUAL", "semantic_scope": "NON_ABSTRACTION", "structural_head": "formal authority or mass broadcast is insufficiently trusted", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P080-C11-U3"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Mobilization may be directed effectively by formal authority or mass broadcast.", "slug": "mobilization"}], "residual_id": "r:mobilization_capacity_through_dense_relationships:b041_a08_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b041_a08_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Formal authority or mass broadcast alone is too slow, too generic, or insufficiently trusted. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Formal authority or mass broadcast alone is too slow, too generic, or insufficiently trusted."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RECLASSIFIED", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 3, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Mobilization may be directed effectively by formal authority or mass broadcast.", "slug": "mobilization"}], "normalized_requirement": "Formal authority or mass broadcast is too slow, generic, or insufficiently trusted for the required action.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RECLASSIFIED", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later candidate-blind atomization classified this remainder as a threshold, parameter, materiality test, or other non-abstraction rather than a catalog gap."}, "predicate": "Formal authority or mass broadcast is too slow, generic, or insufficiently trusted for the required action.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P080-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve willing helpers as the actors requiring coordination support.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Potential participants are willing to contribute help.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail dependence on clear role assignment rather than lack of willingness.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Those willing participants require clear roles to direct their help.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "People who are willing to help need clear roles.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "willing helpers require clear role assignment", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P080-C12-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P080-C12", "dnf": [], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [], "predicate": "People who are willing to help need valid requests.", "resolution": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RESIDUAL", "semantic_scope": "NON_ABSTRACTION", "structural_head": "willing helpers need requests that pass an applicability or legitimacy test", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P080-C12-U2"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P080-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve willing helpers as the actors requiring coordination.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Potential participants are willing to contribute help.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail a coordination dependency rather than treating willingness alone as sufficient.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Those willing participants depend on coordination to organize their help.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require coordination that functions dependably, not merely nominal coordination.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The needed coordination must be reliable.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "People who are willing to help need reliable coordination.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "willing helpers depend on reliable coordination", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P080-C12-U3"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Social capital can support already well-coordinated action and does not entail an unchanneled willingness gap.", "slug": "social_capital"}], "residual_id": "r:mobilization_capacity_through_dense_relationships:b041_a08_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b041_a08_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: People are willing to help but need clear roles, valid requests, and reliable coordination. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["People are willing to help but need clear roles, valid requests, and reliable coordination."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Tried to construct a complete volunteer_management_overload instance without the selected DNF branch; its exact defining signature still forces every branch obligation.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Volunteer-Management Overload", "one_liner": "The crisis failure mode in which would-be helpers arrive faster than a response system's finite credential-brief-assign-supervise intake channel can absorb them, so beyond a threshold each marginal arrival consumes net capacity rather than adding it.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:volunteer_management_overload", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "volunteer_management_overload"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "volunteer_management_overload", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P080-C12-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact volunteer_management_overload record entails one complete DNF branch with all shared obligations and preserves the unit's role direction without a qualifier."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Tried to construct a complete volunteer_management_overload instance without the selected DNF branch; its exact defining signature still forces every branch obligation.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Volunteer-Management Overload", "one_liner": "The crisis failure mode in which would-be helpers arrive faster than a response system's finite credential-brief-assign-supervise intake channel can absorb them, so beyond a threshold each marginal arrival consumes net capacity rather than adding it.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:volunteer_management_overload", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "volunteer_management_overload"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "volunteer_management_overload", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P080-C12-U3", "why_it_fits": "The exact volunteer_management_overload record entails one complete DNF branch with all shared obligations and preserves the unit's role direction without a qualifier."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "People are willing to help but lack clear roles, valid requests, or reliable coordination.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P080-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the need, resource, and multiple-actor roles.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A network contains needs, resources, and multiple actors who can participate in matching them.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail allocation or matching between needs and corresponding resources.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Needs are matched to resources.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail participation by multiple distributed actors rather than merely two endpoints.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Matching is distributed across many actors.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the many-actor architecture in contrast to single-provider centralization.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The matching is not handled by one central provider.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail necessity of the distributed arrangement, not merely its availability.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Distributed matching is required for the case.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "Needs and resources must be matched across many actors rather than by one central provider.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "needs and resources require distributed many-actor matching", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P080-C13-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Relational resources can be deployed bilaterally and do not require many-to-many matching.", "slug": "social_capital"}], "residual_id": "r:mobilization_capacity_through_dense_relationships:b041_a08_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b041_a08_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Needs and resources must be matched across many actors rather than handled by one central provider. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Needs and resources must be matched across many actors rather than handled by one central provider."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Relational resources can be deployed bilaterally and do not require many-to-many matching.", "slug": "social_capital"}], "normalized_requirement": "Needs and resources must be matched across many actors rather than by one provider.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Needs and resources must be matched across many actors rather than by one provider.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Participation must remain voluntary and bounded even when social expectations are strong.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: Participation must remain voluntary and bounded even when social expectations are strong. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Participation must remain voluntary and bounded even when social expectations are strong."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Participation must remain voluntary and bounded even when social expectations are strong."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 41, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-041", "ledger_sha256": "672ab11f3edf16b49307a391eafbdd179b6f11ca9c2b493acd29ca2ad6b6e13e"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Mode-Setting Gain Modulation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:mode_setting_gain_modulation", "slug": "mode_setting_gain_modulation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 7 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 7}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system uses the same content-bearing channels both to carry local information and to control global processing state, causing either under-response, over-response, hidden priority shifts, or control/data confusion when the receiver’s operating mode should be adjusted separately from the content being processed.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system uses the same content-bearing channels both to carry local information and to control global processing state, causing either under-response, over-response, hidden priority shifts, or control/data confusion when the receiver’s operating mode should be adjusted separately from the content being processed."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A diffuse orthogonal channel changes gain or mode across primary content channels without carrying their content.", "role_mapping": "Downstream units -> content processors; sensitivity -> gain; intact stream -> primary content channel.", "slug": "neuromodulation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b041_a09_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Many downstream units need their sensitivity, priority, or readiness changed together, but the individual content stream should remain semantically intact. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Many downstream units need their sensitivity, priority, or readiness changed together, but the individual content stream should remain semantically intact."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Neuromodulation", "one_liner": "A separate, diffuse control channel sets the gain or operating mode by which a system processes content, without itself carrying content.", "page_ref": "prime:neuromodulation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Downstream units -> content processors; sensitivity -> gain; intact stream -> primary content channel.", "slug": "neuromodulation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A diffuse orthogonal channel changes gain or mode across primary content channels without carrying their content."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A broad set of content processors needs a coordinated sensitivity or readiness change while content stays intact.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Holding content fixed while varying the modulator changes the input-output mapping.", "role_mapping": "Message -> primary content; global state -> modulatory signal; handling -> gain or mode.", "slug": "neuromodulation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "A controller selects a mode-specific behavior bundle from environmental state, changing how equivalent input is handled.", "role_mapping": "Global state -> mode signal; same message -> content input; proper handling -> active sub-behavior.", "slug": "contextual_mode_switching", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b041_a09_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The same message has different proper handling depending on global state such as fatigue, risk posture, attention level, workload, threat level, metabolic state, or exploration/exploitation phase. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The same message has different proper handling depending on global state such as fatigue, risk posture, attention level, workload, threat level, metabolic state, or exploration/exploitation phase."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Neuromodulation", "one_liner": "A separate, diffuse control channel sets the gain or operating mode by which a system processes content, without itself carrying content.", "page_ref": "prime:neuromodulation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Message -> primary content; global state -> modulatory signal; handling -> gain or mode.", "slug": "neuromodulation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Holding content fixed while varying the modulator changes the input-output mapping."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Contextual Mode Switching", "one_liner": "Adapt communication.", "page_ref": "prime:contextual_mode_switching", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Global state -> mode signal; same message -> content input; proper handling -> active sub-behavior.", "slug": "contextual_mode_switching", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A controller selects a mode-specific behavior bundle from environmental state, changing how equivalent input is handled."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The same content requires different processing under different global operating states.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P080-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the local-signal, receiver, and receiver-state control roles.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A narrow local signal is available to a receiver whose processing state must be set from relevant conditions.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail inability to encode the context safely, not merely a preference for a separate channel.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The local signal cannot safely encode the required control context.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the completeness requirement over the setting conditions rather than one optional condition.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The limitation concerns all conditions needed to determine the receiver setting.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when the controlled receiver state is gain.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The conditions are needed to set receiver gain.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when the controlled receiver state is operating mode.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The conditions are needed to set receiver mode.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A narrow local signal cannot safely encode every condition required to set a receiver's gain or mode.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "narrow local signal cannot safely carry complete receiver-state control context", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P080-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A channel can have ample capacity and does not entail a separate mode-setting need.", "slug": "channel"}], "residual_id": "r:mode_setting_gain_modulation:b041_a09_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b041_a09_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A narrow local signal cannot safely encode all the conditions needed to set receiver gain or mode. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A narrow local signal cannot safely encode all the conditions needed to set receiver gain or mode."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A channel can have ample capacity and does not entail a separate mode-setting need.", "slug": "channel"}], "normalized_requirement": "A narrow local signal cannot safely encode every condition required to set receiver gain or mode.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A narrow local signal cannot safely encode every condition required to set receiver gain or mode.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P080-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the receiver, content, and intended-regime roles.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A receiver interprets content under an intended processing regime.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail content misinterpretation rather than mere delay or low confidence.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The receiver misinterprets the content.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve repeated misreading rather than a single isolated error.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The content misinterpretation recurs.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail the regime defect as a cause of misreading, not merely contemporaneous context.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A defect in the intended processing regime causes the recurrent misinterpretation.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when the regime is not made explicit to the receiver.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The intended processing regime is implicit.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when the receiver's regime state is outdated.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The intended processing regime is stale.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Receivers repeatedly misinterpret content because its intended processing regime is implicit or stale.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "implicit or stale processing regime causes recurrent content misinterpretation", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P080-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Neuromodulation can be explicit and current; receiver misreading is not constitutive.", "slug": "neuromodulation"}], "residual_id": "r:mode_setting_gain_modulation:b041_a09_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b041_a09_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Receivers keep misreading content because the intended processing regime is implicit or stale. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Receivers keep misreading content because the intended processing regime is implicit or stale."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Tried to keep both prompt_injection and the atomic guard while falsifying the unit; the exact spine plus that qualifier still force one complete DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Prompt Injection", "one_liner": "Untrusted content delivered to a language model through a data channel is interpreted as instructions rather than material to process, so an embedded directive executes at the model's privilege — the failure being the absence of any in-band boundary between instructions and data, not a lapse in alignment.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:prompt_injection", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O3"], "guard_type": "QUANTIFIER_BINDING", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "recurrent_prompt_injection_misinterpretation", "predicate": "The same receiver undergoes the prompt injection misinterpretation repeatedly.", "rationale": "Independent exact-evidence review found a complete DNF branch and no role-direction or qualifier-laundering defect."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "prompt_injection"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "recurrent_prompt_injection_misinterpretation"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "prompt_injection", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P080-C15-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact prompt_injection record supplies the complete structural spine; one candidate-anchored contingent fact fills all and only the remaining guardable obligations."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Receivers misinterpret content because the intended processing regime is implicit or stale.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P081-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the system, gain-control, weak-signal, and noise roles.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A signal-processing system has an adjustable gain, weak input signals, and noise.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail both endpoints as the bound states of the same alternation, not only one response error.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The system alternates between ignoring weak signals and over-amplifying noise.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve recurrent switching rather than two isolated errors with no oscillatory relation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The alternation recurs as an oscillation.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail absence of explicit gain governance rather than a governed gain that is merely set incorrectly once.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Gain is not explicitly governed.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail the governance absence as a cause of the alternating response errors.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The absence of explicit gain governance causes the oscillation.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "A system oscillates between ignoring weak signals and over-amplifying noise because its gain is not explicitly governed.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "ungoverned gain causes oscillation between under-response and noise amplification", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P081-C01-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Gain control is the corrective loop and need not follow prior oscillation.", "slug": "gain_control"}], "residual_id": "r:mode_setting_gain_modulation:b041_a09_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b041_a09_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A system oscillates between ignoring weak signals and over-amplifying noise because gain is not explicitly governed. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A system oscillates between ignoring weak signals and over-amplifying noise because gain is not explicitly governed."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Gain control is the corrective loop and need not follow prior oscillation.", "slug": "gain_control"}], "normalized_requirement": "Ungoverned gain makes the system oscillate between missing weak signals and amplifying noise.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Ungoverned gain makes the system oscillate between missing weak signals and amplifying noise.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The broad modulatory channel broadcasts gain or readiness separately from the primary information stream.", "role_mapping": "Broadcast state -> diffuse modulator; local information -> content channel.", "slug": "neuromodulation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b041_a09_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A platform, organization, or nervous system needs to broadcast readiness or urgency without replacing the information that individual channels carry. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A platform, organization, or nervous system needs to broadcast readiness or urgency without replacing the information that individual channels carry."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Neuromodulation", "one_liner": "A separate, diffuse control channel sets the gain or operating mode by which a system processes content, without itself carrying content.", "page_ref": "prime:neuromodulation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Broadcast state -> diffuse modulator; local information -> content channel.", "slug": "neuromodulation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The broad modulatory channel broadcasts gain or readiness separately from the primary information stream."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The system must broadcast readiness or urgency without replacing the information in local content channels.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The orthogonal modulator sets gain, bias, sensitivity, threshold, or learning mode without altering content identity.", "role_mapping": "Higher-order layer -> modulator; tuned parameter -> gain or mode; provenance -> unchanged content channel.", "slug": "neuromodulation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b041_a09_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Local processors must preserve content provenance while a higher-order control layer tunes thresholds, learning rate, attention, or action tendency. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Local processors must preserve content provenance while a higher-order control layer tunes thresholds, learning rate, attention, or action tendency."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Neuromodulation", "one_liner": "A separate, diffuse control channel sets the gain or operating mode by which a system processes content, without itself carrying content.", "page_ref": "prime:neuromodulation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Higher-order layer -> modulator; tuned parameter -> gain or mode; provenance -> unchanged content channel.", "slug": "neuromodulation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The orthogonal modulator sets gain, bias, sensitivity, threshold, or learning mode without altering content identity."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A higher-order control layer tunes thresholds, attention, learning rate, or action tendency while local content provenance is preserved.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 41, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-041", "ledger_sha256": "672ab11f3edf16b49307a391eafbdd179b6f11ca9c2b493acd29ca2ad6b6e13e"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Model-Based Regulation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:model_based_regulation", "slug": "model_based_regulation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 6 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A regulator applies rules or interventions without an adequate representation of the system it is trying to control. The same observed cue can arise from different hidden states, actions have delayed or coupled effects, and the operating environment changes. Because the regulator does not encode these relationships or test its predictions, it repeats locally plausible actions that are globally ineffective, unstable, or unsafe.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A regulator applies rules or interventions without an adequate representation of the system it is trying to control. The same observed cue can arise from different hidden states, actions have delayed or coupled effects, and the operating environment changes. Because the regulator does not encode these relationships or test its predictions, it repeats locally plausible actions that are globally ineffective, unstable, or unsafe."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P081-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the regulator, regulated-system, and internal-condition roles.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A regulator acts on a system that has internal state or operating conditions.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require decision-relevant or outcome-relevant hidden information, not harmless unobserved detail.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The incompletely observable state or condition is consequential for regulating the system.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires consequential state that is unobserved, not merely noisy but fully visible state.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Consequential internal system state is hidden from the regulator.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires incomplete observability of consequential operating conditions.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Consequential system conditions are only partially observable to the regulator.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A regulated system has consequential state or conditions that are hidden or only partially observable to the regulator.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "consequential system state is not fully observable to the regulator", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P081-C02-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Effective regulation requires a model but the regulated state can be fully observable.", "slug": "good_regulator_theorem"}], "residual_id": "r:model_based_regulation:b041_a10_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b041_a10_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The system has consequential hidden state or partially observable conditions. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The system has consequential hidden state or partially observable conditions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Effective regulation requires a model but the regulated state can be fully observable.", "slug": "good_regulator_theorem"}], "normalized_requirement": "The regulated system has consequential hidden or partially observable state.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The regulated system has consequential hidden or partially observable state.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P081-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the action-to-effect direction.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A regulating action produces an effect on the system.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail non-immediate effect manifestation relative to the action.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The effect manifests after a delay from the action.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "A regulatory action has a delayed effect.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "regulatory-action effect manifests after a delay", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P081-C03-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P081-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve comparable action-input and system-response roles.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A regulating action has a magnitude or setting and produces a system effect with a magnitude or state response.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail a nonlinear response relation, not a constant proportional action-effect mapping.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The effect does not vary linearly or proportionally with the action.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "A regulatory action has a nonlinear effect.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "regulatory-action magnitude and effect magnitude have a nonlinear relation", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P081-C03-U2"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P081-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the system-history and action roles.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A system has a prior trajectory and receives a regulating action.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail dependence of the current action effect on prior path, not only current state.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The effect of the action depends on the system's prior trajectory.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "A regulatory action has a path-dependent effect.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "regulatory-action effect depends on the system's prior path", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P081-C03-U3"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P081-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve an action origin and a boundary separating it from another affected domain.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A regulating action occurs within an originating system, domain, or jurisdiction that has a relevant boundary.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail effect propagation beyond the originating boundary.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The action produces an effect across that boundary.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "A regulatory action has an effect that crosses a relevant system or jurisdictional boundary.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "regulatory action produces an effect across a boundary", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P081-C03-U4"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The theorem also applies to systems with immediate linear local effects.", "slug": "good_regulator_theorem"}], "residual_id": "r:model_based_regulation:b041_a10_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b041_a10_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Actions have delayed, nonlinear, path-dependent, or cross-boundary effects. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Actions have delayed, nonlinear, path-dependent, or cross-boundary effects."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PARTIALLY_DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "I tried to keep carryover and the guard while removing prior-path dependence, but a later response uncontaminated by the earlier treatment is not a carryover effect.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Carryover Effect", "one_liner": "The validity threat in crossover and within-subject designs where residual influence from an earlier treatment persists into a later measurement window, biasing the contrast — its magnitude set by the unit's relaxation time against the inter-treatment gap.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:carryover_effect", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "later_treatment_is_regulating_intervention", "predicate": "The later treatment is a regulating intervention applied to the system.", "rationale": "Independent exact-evidence review found a complete DNF branch and no role-direction or qualifier-laundering defect."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "carryover_effect"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "later_treatment_is_regulating_intervention"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "carryover_effect", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P081-C03-U3", "why_it_fits": "Carryover necessarily provides the prior-state-to-current-effect dependence, and one atomic domain guard types the existing later treatment as regulatory."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Tried to construct a complete organizational_influence_failure instance without the selected DNF branch; its exact defining signature still forces every obligation in that branch.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Organizational Influence Failure", "one_liner": "The accident-causation configuration in which upper-level resource, culture, and process decisions systematically stage the downstream conditions under which frontline operators produce unsafe acts — the apex of the HFACS four-level hierarchy, reclassifying the visible failure as the expression of an upstream choice rather than its cause.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:organizational_influence_failure", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "organizational_influence_failure"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "organizational_influence_failure", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P081-C03-U4", "why_it_fits": "The exact organizational_influence_failure record entails one complete DNF branch, preserves role direction, and needs no qualifier."}], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 4, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 2, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 2}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The theorem also applies to systems with immediate linear local effects.", "slug": "good_regulator_theorem"}], "normalized_requirement": "Regulatory actions have delayed, nonlinear, path-dependent, or cross-boundary effects.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "PARTIAL_EXISTING_DSA_GROUNDING", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation grounded 2 of 4 eligible atomic units; the remaining unit or units stayed open."}, "predicate": "Regulatory actions have delayed, nonlinear, path-dependent, or cross-boundary effects.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P081-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve intervention identity across multiple regime contexts.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "One intervention is applied under two or more operating regimes.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require distinct operating regimes rather than repeated application in one unchanged context.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The operating regimes differ.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail regime-dependent outcome variation for the identical intervention.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The same intervention produces different outcomes across those regimes.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "The same intervention produces different outcomes in different operating regimes.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "same intervention has regime-dependent outcomes", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P081-C04-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A regulator can model a regime-invariant system.", "slug": "good_regulator_theorem"}], "residual_id": "r:model_based_regulation:b041_a10_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b041_a10_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The same intervention produces different outcomes in different operating regimes. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The same intervention produces different outcomes in different operating regimes."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A regulator can model a regime-invariant system.", "slug": "good_regulator_theorem"}], "normalized_requirement": "The same intervention produces different outcomes across operating regimes.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The same intervention produces different outcomes across operating regimes.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Requisite variety bounds response repertoire against disturbance variety but does not entail deliberative choice among interventions.", "slug": "requisite_variety"}], "residual_id": "r:model_based_regulation:b041_a10_c4", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b041_a10_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A regulator has multiple possible actions and must choose among them rather than merely react. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A regulator has multiple possible actions and must choose among them rather than merely react."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Requisite variety bounds response repertoire against disturbance variety but does not entail deliberative choice among interventions.", "slug": "requisite_variety"}], "normalized_requirement": "The regulator has multiple consequential actions and must select among them rather than merely react.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The regulator has multiple consequential actions and must select among them rather than merely react.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P081-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the same unchanged rule, its performance, and the changing context in which it continues to operate.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A rule remains fixed while its performance is observed across a changing operating context.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail directional performance degradation, not merely performance variation with unknown sign.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The rule performs worse after or during relevant contextual change than before that change.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by system change associated with rule-performance degradation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The relevant change occurs in the system.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by population change associated with rule-performance degradation.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The relevant change occurs in the population.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by incentive change associated with rule-performance degradation.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The relevant change occurs in incentives.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by environmental change associated with rule-performance degradation.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The relevant change occurs in the environment.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A fixed rule's performance degrades as the system, population, incentives, or environment changes.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "fixed-rule performance degrades under contextual change", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P081-C05-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A modeled regulator can remain effective in a stationary environment indefinitely.", "slug": "good_regulator_theorem"}], "residual_id": "r:model_based_regulation:b041_a10_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b041_a10_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Rule performance degrades as the system, population, incentives, or environment changes. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Rule performance degrades as the system, population, incentives, or environment changes."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "I tried to keep a procedural hazard-control decay instance and the guard without directional degradation, but decay requires formerly working protection to erode over time.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Hazard-Control Decay", "one_liner": "Track the widening gap between what a safety control's paperwork says it does and what it actually does under hazard, so that a control certified sound by audit can be found silently unprotective before it fails.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:hazard_control_decay", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "protective_control_is_rule", "predicate": "The documented protective control is a procedural rule.", "rationale": "Independent exact-evidence review found a complete DNF branch and no role-direction or qualifier-laundering defect."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "hazard_control_decay"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "protective_control_is_rule"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "hazard_control_decay", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P081-C05-U1", "why_it_fits": "The system-change branch is structurally complete after one candidate-anchored restriction from protective control to its named procedural-rule subtype."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Tried to construct a complete ecological_trap instance without the selected DNF branch; its exact defining signature still forces every obligation in that branch.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Ecological Trap", "one_liner": "The situation where an organism's evolved decision rule keeps following a once-reliable cue whose correlation with fitness has been severed by recent change, so the unchanged rule now reliably steers it toward a low-fitness or lethal outcome it actively prefers.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:ecological_trap", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "ecological_trap"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "ecological_trap", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P081-C05-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact ecological_trap record entails one complete DNF branch, preserves role direction, and needs no qualifier."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A fixed rule loses performance as the system, population, incentives, or environment changes.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P081-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the regulator's operative but implicit model.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A regulator operates with a current implicit model of the controlled system.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail the anomaly-to-model-error diagnostic relation rather than merely co-occurrence.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "An observed control anomaly is evidence that the current implicit model is wrong.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by oscillation in the control process.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The diagnostic anomaly is control oscillation.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by recurring outcomes that surprise the model or regulator.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The diagnostic anomaly is repeated surprise.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by residuals that persist rather than isolated noise.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The diagnostic anomaly is persistent residual error.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Control oscillation, repeated surprise, or persistent residuals indicate that the regulator's current implicit model is wrong.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "persistent control anomaly indicates an incorrect implicit model", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P081-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The theorem states what successful regulation contains and does not require prior surprise or an incorrect implicit model.", "slug": "good_regulator_theorem"}], "residual_id": "r:model_based_regulation:b041_a10_c7", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b041_a10_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Control oscillation, repeated surprise, or persistent residuals indicate that the current implicit model is wrong. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Control oscillation, repeated surprise, or persistent residuals indicate that the current implicit model is wrong."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The theorem states what successful regulation contains and does not require prior surprise or an incorrect implicit model.", "slug": "good_regulator_theorem"}], "normalized_requirement": "Oscillation, repeated surprise, or persistent residual error indicates that the regulator's implicit model is wrong.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Oscillation, repeated surprise, or persistent residual error indicates that the regulator's implicit model is wrong.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "High-consequence decisions require an explicit rationale, validation record, and fallback.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: High-consequence decisions require an explicit rationale, validation record, and fallback. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["High-consequence decisions require an explicit rationale, validation record, and fallback."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "High-consequence decisions require an explicit rationale, validation record, and fallback."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 41, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-041", "ledger_sha256": "672ab11f3edf16b49307a391eafbdd179b6f11ca9c2b493acd29ca2ad6b6e13e"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Model-Guided Signal Separation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:model_guided_signal_separation", "slug": "model_guided_signal_separation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The decision-relevant target is not directly observed. It is mixed, blurred, convolved, projected, masked, sampled, or otherwise entangled with nuisance sources and measurement error. Raw observations therefore contain both target information and competing structure, while naive smoothing, thresholding, or learned cleanup can suppress the target, leak nuisance into the estimate, or hallucinate plausible structure.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "The decision-relevant target is not directly observed. It is mixed, blurred, convolved, projected, masked, sampled, or otherwise entangled with nuisance sources and measurement error. Raw observations therefore contain both target information and competing structure, while naive smoothing, thresholding, or learned cleanup can suppress the target, leak nuisance into the estimate, or hallucinate plausible structure."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The target signal is not directly readable from an entangled observation and must be quantitatively recovered.", "role_mapping": "Target quantity -> signal component; estimated -> recovered signal.", "slug": "signal_extraction", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b041_a11_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A target quantity, trajectory, source, or pattern must be estimated rather than directly read. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A target quantity, trajectory, source, or pattern must be estimated rather than directly read."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Signal Extraction", "one_liner": "Quantitatively recovering a target component from an entangled observation using a signal model, a noise model, and a discriminator.", "page_ref": "prime:signal_extraction", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Target quantity -> signal component; estimated -> recovered signal.", "slug": "signal_extraction", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The target signal is not directly readable from an entangled observation and must be quantitatively recovered."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A decision-relevant target component must be estimated rather than read directly.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The observable necessarily superposes target and non-target components so neither is directly readable.", "role_mapping": "Target -> signal; nuisance -> noise; overlap -> entangled observation.", "slug": "signal_extraction", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b041_a11_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Target and nuisance overlap in time, space, frequency, channels, features, or measurement response. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Target and nuisance overlap in time, space, frequency, channels, features, or measurement response."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Signal Extraction", "one_liner": "Quantitatively recovering a target component from an entangled observation using a signal model, a noise model, and a discriminator.", "page_ref": "prime:signal_extraction", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Target -> signal; nuisance -> noise; overlap -> entangled observation.", "slug": "signal_extraction", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The observable necessarily superposes target and non-target components so neither is directly readable."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Target and nuisance components overlap in the observed time, space, frequency, channel, feature, or response domain.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Explicit signal and noise models plus a discriminator exploiting their difference are mandatory.", "role_mapping": "Target model -> signal model; nuisance model -> noise model; separator -> discriminator.", "slug": "signal_extraction", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b041_a11_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A plausible observation model, target model, nuisance model, reference, or structural constraint can be stated and tested. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A plausible observation model, target model, nuisance model, reference, or structural constraint can be stated and tested."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Signal Extraction", "one_liner": "Quantitatively recovering a target component from an entangled observation using a signal model, a noise model, and a discriminator.", "page_ref": "prime:signal_extraction", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Target model -> signal model; nuisance model -> noise model; separator -> discriminator.", "slug": "signal_extraction", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Explicit signal and noise models plus a discriminator exploiting their difference are mandatory."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Testable target and nuisance models or structural constraints can support a discriminator.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Signal extraction distinguishes assignment errors but does not entail materially asymmetric consequences.", "slug": "signal_extraction"}], "residual_id": "r:model_guided_signal_separation:b041_a11_c6", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b041_a11_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: False retention and false suppression have materially different consequences. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["False retention and false suppression have materially different consequences."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Signal extraction distinguishes assignment errors but does not entail materially asymmetric consequences.", "slug": "signal_extraction"}], "normalized_requirement": "False retention and false suppression have materially different consequences.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "False retention and false suppression have materially different consequences.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The downstream decision depends on target magnitude, timing, shape, phase, location, or uncertainty rather than mere presence.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The decision-relevant target is not directly observed. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The downstream decision depends on target magnitude, timing, shape, phase, location, or uncertainty rather than mere presence. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The downstream decision depends on target magnitude, timing, shape, phase, location, or uncertainty rather than mere presence.", "The decision-relevant target is not directly observed."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "The downstream decision depends on target magnitude, timing, shape, phase, location, or uncertainty rather than mere presence."}, {"display_text": "Measurement redesign is impossible, too slow, or insufficient by itself.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this deployment constraint: Measurement redesign is impossible, too slow, or insufficient by itself. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Measurement redesign is impossible, too slow, or insufficient by itself."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Measurement redesign is impossible, too slow, or insufficient by itself."}, {"display_text": "Repeated, multichannel, simulated, controlled, or independently measured data can support validation.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: Repeated, multichannel, simulated, controlled, or independently measured data can support validation. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Repeated, multichannel, simulated, controlled, or independently measured data can support validation."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "Repeated, multichannel, simulated, controlled, or independently measured data can support validation."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 41, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-041", "ledger_sha256": "672ab11f3edf16b49307a391eafbdd179b6f11ca9c2b493acd29ca2ad6b6e13e"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Modular Decomposition", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:modular_decomposition", "slug": "modular_decomposition"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 4 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is entanglement. Responsibilities, dependencies, decisions, and change paths are packed together so tightly that reasoning about one part requires reasoning about the whole. That produces cognitive overload, ownership ambiguity, slow change, and accidental side effects.\n\nThe underlying tension is that the system must function as a coherent whole, but the whole is too large or too interdependent to handle directly. A single undivided structure may feel simpler at first, but as scale grows it becomes hard to inspect, repair, teach, delegate, or evolve.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A complex whole has internal interactions, responsibilities, or change paths that are too entangled for effective understanding, modification, operation, or ownership."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P081-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the local-change role and downstream side-effect roles in the same system.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A change is made locally within one part of a larger system and produces effects beyond that focal change.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail the local change as a cause, not merely a coincident event.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The local change causes the side effects.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require whole-system reach rather than broad but sub-system-limited nonlocal spread.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The side effects propagate across the whole relevant system.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail lack of reliable advance prediction for the propagated effects.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The resulting side effects are unpredictable in advance.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "A local change causes wide and unpredictable side effects across the whole relevant system.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "local change causes unpredictable side effects across the whole system", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P081-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Modularity is the low-coupling solution state in which local change is contained, not this entangled failure.", "slug": "modularity"}], "residual_id": "r:modular_decomposition:b041_a12_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b041_a12_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Local changes cause wide and unpredictable side effects. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Local changes cause wide and unpredictable side effects."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Tried to construct a complete spaghetti_code instance without the selected DNF branch; its exact defining signature still forces every obligation in that branch.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Spaghetti Code", "one_liner": "Diagnose a codebase as unmaintainable by reading its dependency graph: when boundary-violating edges accumulate past a threshold, the cost of any local change scales with the whole system rather than the unit being changed.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:spaghetti_code", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "spaghetti_code"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "spaghetti_code", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P081-C07-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact spaghetti_code record entails one complete DNF branch, preserves role direction, and needs no qualifier."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Local changes produce wide and unpredictable side effects across the whole.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Decomposition may be useful even when one actor can understand the whole.", "slug": "decomposition"}], "residual_id": "r:modular_decomposition:b041_a12_c2", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b041_a12_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: No actor can reason about the whole at the required level of detail. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["No actor can reason about the whole at the required level of detail."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Decomposition may be useful even when one actor can understand the whole.", "slug": "decomposition"}], "normalized_requirement": "No actor can reason about the whole at the detail required for action.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "No actor can reason about the whole at the detail required for action.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P081-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve one work whole and a proposed decomposition of that work.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A body of work is to be divided among components, roles, or actors.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail unavoidable decomposition failure rather than a division that only sometimes fails.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The work cannot be divided without producing at least one listed failure.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by overlapping work that duplicates effort.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Division duplicates effort across work units.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by uncovered work or responsibility gaps.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Division leaves gaps in work or responsibility coverage.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Work cannot be divided without either duplicating effort or leaving gaps.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "work division necessarily creates duplication or gaps", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P081-C08-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Well-designed modularity eliminates rather than entails duplicated work and gaps.", "slug": "modularity"}], "residual_id": "r:modular_decomposition:b041_a12_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b041_a12_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Work cannot be divided without duplicating effort or creating gaps. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Work cannot be divided without duplicating effort or creating gaps."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Well-designed modularity eliminates rather than entails duplicated work and gaps.", "slug": "modularity"}], "normalized_requirement": "Work cannot be divided without duplicated effort or uncovered responsibilities.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Work cannot be divided without duplicated effort or uncovered responsibilities.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P081-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve multiple components belonging to the same system.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A system contains two or more distinct parts that change over time.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail rate heterogeneity large enough to matter in the focal system, not any negligible nonzero difference.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The system parts change at materially different rates.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Different parts of a system change at materially different rates.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "system parts have materially heterogeneous change rates", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P081-C09-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P081-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve multiple changing components in the same system.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A system contains two or more distinct parts that change.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail heterogeneous change drivers across components, not one shared cause acting uniformly.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Different causes or drivers account for change in the different parts.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Different parts of a system change for different reasons.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "system parts have heterogeneous drivers of change", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P081-C09-U2"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Modules can change at the same rate and for the same reason.", "slug": "modularity"}], "residual_id": "r:modular_decomposition:b041_a12_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b041_a12_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Different parts of the system change at different rates or for different reasons. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Different parts of the system change at different rates or for different reasons."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PARTIALLY_DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Tried to construct a complete requirements_churn instance without the selected DNF branch; its exact defining signature still forces every obligation in that branch.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Requirements Churn", "one_liner": "A project pathology in which the specification changes faster than the execution organization can absorb it — a control-theoretic case where the reference signal outruns the controller's bandwidth, so no spec lives long enough for work to consolidate against it.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:requirements_churn", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "requirements_churn"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "requirements_churn", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P081-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact requirements_churn record entails one complete DNF branch, preserves role direction, and needs no qualifier."}], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 2, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 1, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Modules can change at the same rate and for the same reason.", "slug": "modularity"}], "normalized_requirement": "System parts change at materially different rates or for different reasons.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "PARTIAL_EXISTING_DSA_GROUNDING", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation grounded 1 of 2 eligible atomic units; the remaining unit or units stayed open."}, "predicate": "System parts change at materially different rates or for different reasons.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The whole needs to scale, evolve, or accept variation without constant redesign.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A single undivided structure may feel simpler at first, but as scale grows it becomes hard to inspect, repair, teach, delegate, or evolve. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: The whole needs to scale, evolve, or accept variation without constant redesign. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The whole needs to scale, evolve, or accept variation without constant redesign.", "A single undivided structure may feel simpler at first, but as scale grows it becomes hard to inspect, repair, teach, delegate, or evolve."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The whole needs to scale, evolve, or accept variation without constant redesign."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 41, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-041", "ledger_sha256": "672ab11f3edf16b49307a391eafbdd179b6f11ca9c2b493acd29ca2ad6b6e13e"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Monte Carlo Uncertainty Exploration", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:monte_carlo_uncertainty_exploration", "slug": "monte_carlo_uncertainty_exploration"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 5, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 6 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is hidden combinatorial uncertainty. A system may have many uncertain inputs, and each input may look manageable on its own. But their combined effect creates a large space of possible outcomes. Single forecasts, average-case plans, and a few hand-picked scenarios cannot reliably represent that space.\n\nThis causes two recurring failures. First, organizations overcommit to deterministic plans that fail when normal variation compounds. Second, they debate which scenario is “realistic” without seeing how likely different outcome classes are under their own assumptions.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A decision depends on several uncertain drivers whose combined effects cannot be safely reduced to a single point estimate, average case, or hand-picked scenario. The system may appear analyzable in pieces, but interactions, nonlinearities, tails, and dependence among inputs make ordinary calculation or intuition misleading."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Uncertainty can concern one input and need not be joint or decision-relevant.", "slug": "uncertainty"}], "residual_id": "r:monte_carlo_uncertainty_exploration:b041_a13_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b041_a13_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The decision has multiple uncertain inputs such as demand, cost, duration, reliability, failure probability, weather, behavior, prices, or measurement error. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The decision has multiple uncertain inputs such as demand, cost, duration, reliability, failure probability, weather, behavior, prices, or measurement error."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Uncertainty can concern one input and need not be joint or decision-relevant.", "slug": "uncertainty"}], "normalized_requirement": "A decision depends jointly on multiple uncertain inputs.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A decision depends jointly on multiple uncertain inputs.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Random sampling approximation is used when direct analytic computation is difficult, with convergence governed by the law of large numbers.", "role_mapping": "Combined uncertainty -> target distribution; repeated samples -> Monte Carlo draws.", "slug": "monte_carlo_simulation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b041_a13_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Analytic calculation is unavailable, fragile, too slow, or too simplified to represent the combined uncertainty that matters. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Analytic calculation is unavailable, fragile, too slow, or too simplified to represent the combined uncertainty that matters."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Monte Carlo Simulation", "one_liner": "Random sampling approximation.", "page_ref": "prime:monte_carlo_simulation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Combined uncertainty -> target distribution; repeated samples -> Monte Carlo draws.", "slug": "monte_carlo_simulation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Random sampling approximation is used when direct analytic computation is difficult, with convergence governed by the law of large numbers."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Analytic integration is unavailable or impractical, while repeated random sampling can approximate the combined output distribution.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A heavy-tailed distribution can be studied for reasons other than a decision threshold, and threshold risk can occur without heavy tails.", "slug": "heavy_tailed_distributions"}], "residual_id": "r:monte_carlo_uncertainty_exploration:b041_a13_c3", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b041_a13_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Outcome tails, threshold-crossing probabilities, or frequency of unacceptable states matter more than the average outcome. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Outcome tails, threshold-crossing probabilities, or frequency of unacceptable states matter more than the average outcome."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A heavy-tailed distribution can be studied for reasons other than a decision threshold, and threshold risk can occur without heavy tails.", "slug": "heavy_tailed_distributions"}], "normalized_requirement": "Tail outcomes, threshold crossings, or unacceptable-state frequency matter more than the mean alone.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Tail outcomes, threshold crossings, or unacceptable-state frequency matter more than the mean alone.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P081-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve stakeholder decision reliance, a forecast artifact, and varying inputs.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Stakeholders use a forecast representation for a decision whose inputs vary.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail actual reliance rather than mere availability or exploratory use.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The stakeholders rely on the simplified forecast artifact.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve decision-relevant input variation rather than negligible noise.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Variation in the forecast inputs is material to the decision.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by reliance on one forecast path or point projection.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The relied-on representation is a single forecast.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by reliance on a hand-picked best or worst case.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The relied-on representation is a best-case or worst-case scenario.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by reliance on a deterministic spreadsheet model.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The relied-on representation is a deterministic spreadsheet.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Stakeholders rely on a simplified deterministic or hand-picked forecast representation even though input variation is material.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "stakeholders rely on simplified forecast representation despite material input variation", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P081-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Scenario planning can already represent multiple futures and does not entail reliance on one forecast.", "slug": "scenario_planning"}], "residual_id": "r:monte_carlo_uncertainty_exploration:b041_a13_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b041_a13_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Stakeholders are relying on a single forecast, best/worst case, or deterministic spreadsheet even though input variation is material. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders are relying on a single forecast, best/worst case, or deterministic spreadsheet even though input variation is material."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Scenario planning can already represent multiple futures and does not entail reliance on one forecast.", "slug": "scenario_planning"}], "normalized_requirement": "Stakeholders rely on one deterministic forecast despite material input variation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Stakeholders rely on one deterministic forecast despite material input variation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P081-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the planning process, plausible-driver inputs, and multiple outcome categories.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A scenario-planning process has identified plausible drivers and distinguishes multiple outcome classes.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail absence of a frequency-estimation capability, not merely imprecise estimates.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The process lacks a way to estimate outcome-class occurrence frequencies.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a distribution or frequency question across outcome classes rather than only naming possible outcomes.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The missing estimate concerns how often different outcome classes occur.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}], "predicate": "Scenario planning identifies plausible drivers but cannot estimate the occurrence frequencies of different outcome classes.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "scenario planning lacks outcome-class frequency estimation", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P081-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Scenario planning need not seek or permit frequency estimates.", "slug": "scenario_planning"}], "residual_id": "r:monte_carlo_uncertainty_exploration:b041_a13_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b041_a13_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Scenario planning has identified plausible drivers but lacks a way to estimate how often different outcome classes occur. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Scenario planning has identified plausible drivers but lacks a way to estimate how often different outcome classes occur."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Scenario planning need not seek or permit frequency estimates.", "slug": "scenario_planning"}], "normalized_requirement": "Plausible drivers are known but their outcome-class frequencies are not estimated.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Plausible drivers are known but their outcome-class frequencies are not estimated.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P081-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the existing model and its own uncertainty assumptions.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An existing model is governed by assumptions about uncertainty.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail implicitness of the assumptions rather than explicit assumptions that are merely disputed.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Those uncertainty assumptions are not made explicit.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "A model exists, but its uncertainty assumptions are implicit.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "model uncertainty assumptions remain implicit", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P081-C12-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P081-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve one model and the collection of uncertainty assumptions that govern it.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An existing model has multiple assumptions governing uncertainty.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail dispersion of the assumptions rather than a coherent consolidated specification.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The uncertainty assumptions are scattered across separate locations or representations.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "A model exists, but its uncertainty assumptions are scattered.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "model uncertainty assumptions are distributed across disconnected locations", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P081-C12-U2"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P081-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the model-assumption source and the decision-facing risk-summary target.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An existing model has uncertainty assumptions and supports a decision that needs risk summaries.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail absence of the assumption-to-summary transformation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The assumptions have not been translated into risk summaries.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve decision relevance rather than any generic technical uncertainty report.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The missing summaries must be relevant to the decision.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "A model exists, but its uncertainty assumptions are not translated into decision-relevant risk summaries.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "model uncertainty assumptions are not transformed into decision-relevant risk summaries", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P081-C12-U3"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A distributional assumption can be explicit and fully reported.", "slug": "distributional_assumption"}], "residual_id": "r:monte_carlo_uncertainty_exploration:b041_a13_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b041_a13_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A model exists, but its uncertainty assumptions are implicit, scattered, or not translated into decision-relevant risk summaries. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A model exists, but its uncertainty assumptions are implicit, scattered, or not translated into decision-relevant risk summaries."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 3, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 3}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A distributional assumption can be explicit and fully reported.", "slug": "distributional_assumption"}], "normalized_requirement": "A model exists but its uncertainty assumptions are implicit or absent from decision-relevant risk summaries.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 3 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A model exists but its uncertainty assumptions are implicit or absent from decision-relevant risk summaries.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 41, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-041", "ledger_sha256": "672ab11f3edf16b49307a391eafbdd179b6f11ca9c2b493acd29ca2ad6b6e13e"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Moral Hazard Mitigation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:moral_hazard_mitigation", "slug": "moral_hazard_mitigation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is not risk by itself. It is risk under a protection arrangement: one actor controls behavior, another party or pool absorbs much of the downside, and the protected actor’s care, effort, or usage becomes less disciplined.\n\nThe root tension is that protection is often socially, operationally, or economically valuable. Removing all protection may create fragility, exclusion, or underuse of beneficial services. The intervention therefore needs to preserve the protective purpose while reducing avoidable cost shifting.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "An actor is insulated from the full cost of risky behavior and therefore may take more risk than the system can absorb."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Protection or insurance separates the agent's payoff from the full downside of its action.", "role_mapping": "Protected actor -> agent; insulated loss -> shifted downside.", "slug": "moral_hazard", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b041_a14_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: An actor is protected from some loss, cost, liability, penalty, repair burden, or reputational consequence. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["An actor is protected from some loss, cost, liability, penalty, repair burden, or reputational consequence."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Moral Hazard", "one_liner": "Risk-taking under protection.", "page_ref": "prime:moral_hazard", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Protected actor -> agent; insulated loss -> shifted downside.", "slug": "moral_hazard", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Protection or insurance separates the agent's payoff from the full downside of its action."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "An actor is protected from part of the loss, liability, repair burden, penalty, or reputational consequence of risk.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The agent's hidden action changes the stochastic outcome borne partly by the principal.", "role_mapping": "Actor choice -> hidden action; loss probability -> outcome distribution.", "slug": "moral_hazard", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b041_a14_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The protected actor can influence the probability, severity, frequency, or cost of the loss. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The protected actor can influence the probability, severity, frequency, or cost of the loss."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Moral Hazard", "one_liner": "Risk-taking under protection.", "page_ref": "prime:moral_hazard", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Actor choice -> hidden action; loss probability -> outcome distribution.", "slug": "moral_hazard", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The agent's hidden action changes the stochastic outcome borne partly by the principal."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The protected actor controls effort or exposure that changes the probability, severity, frequency, or cost of loss.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The principal or risk pool bears outcome cost not fully internalized by the agent.", "role_mapping": "Other party -> principal; residual cost -> principal payoff loss.", "slug": "moral_hazard", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b041_a14_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The residual cost is borne by another party, shared pool, future budget, insurer, principal, platform, or public system. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The residual cost is borne by another party, shared pool, future budget, insurer, principal, platform, or public system."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Moral Hazard", "one_liner": "Risk-taking under protection.", "page_ref": "prime:moral_hazard", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Other party -> principal; residual cost -> principal payoff loss.", "slug": "moral_hazard", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The principal or risk pool bears outcome cost not fully internalized by the agent."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Residual loss is borne by a principal, insurer, shared pool, future budget, platform, public, or other party.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Hidden action and outcome stochasticity prevent the principal from directly observing the agent's risk choice.", "role_mapping": "Care or exposure -> action; delayed observation -> hidden-action information structure.", "slug": "moral_hazard", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b041_a14_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The actor’s care, effort, usage, or risk exposure is hard to observe directly or is only discovered after losses occur. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The actor’s care, effort, usage, or risk exposure is hard to observe directly or is only discovered after losses occur."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Moral Hazard", "one_liner": "Risk-taking under protection.", "page_ref": "prime:moral_hazard", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Care or exposure -> action; delayed observation -> hidden-action information structure.", "slug": "moral_hazard", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Hidden action and outcome stochasticity prevent the principal from directly observing the agent's risk choice."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The actor's care, effort, usage, or risk exposure is hidden or observed only after losses occur.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Removing protection entirely would be undesirable because the protection has legitimate value.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "**Removing protection entirely would be undesirable because the protection has legitimate value.:* The design challenge is calibration, not simply withdrawing all coverage or support. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: Removing protection entirely would be undesirable because the protection has legitimate value. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Removing protection entirely would be undesirable because the protection has legitimate value.", "**Removing protection entirely would be undesirable because the protection has legitimate value.:* The design challenge is calibration, not simply withdrawing all coverage or support."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Removing protection entirely would be undesirable because the protection has legitimate value."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 41, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-041", "ledger_sha256": "672ab11f3edf16b49307a391eafbdd179b6f11ca9c2b493acd29ca2ad6b6e13e"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Moral Panic De-escalation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:moral_panic_deescalation", "slug": "moral_panic_deescalation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a collapse of four distinctions. First, fear becomes treated as proof. Second, repetition becomes treated as independent confirmation. Third, a specific concern becomes generalized into a broad moral threat. Fourth, the desire for visible action becomes stronger than the discipline of proportional response.\n\nWhen these distinctions collapse, institutions and communities can overreach. They may punish too broadly, stigmatize a group, adopt permanent restrictions from temporary uncertainty, or communicate in ways that make the threat story more memorable. The panic may contain a real concern, but the collective response becomes poorly calibrated.\n\nThe central tension is responsiveness versus restraint. Waiting for perfect evidence can leave people unprotected. Acting on weak or distorted evidence can harm people and lock in bad policy. The archetype resolves this by allowing temporary protective action while preserving evidence quality, affected-group protection, and review.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A perceived social threat becomes amplified beyond the available evidence or proportional response need. Anxiety, moral framing, repetition, and group targeting can cause institutions or communities to punish too broadly, restrict too much, blame symbolic targets, or lock in emergency measures after uncertainty has passed."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Moral panic requires an amplified perceived societal threat framed through moral danger.", "role_mapping": "Group or issue -> folk devil or threat; urgent framing -> rapid moral amplification.", "slug": "moral_panic", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b041_a15_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A group or issue is framed as an urgent, existential, contaminating, corrupting, or civilization-level threat. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A group or issue is framed as an urgent, existential, contaminating, corrupting, or civilization-level threat."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Moral Panic", "one_liner": "Amplified societal fear.", "page_ref": "prime:moral_panic", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Group or issue -> folk devil or threat; urgent framing -> rapid moral amplification.", "slug": "moral_panic", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Moral panic requires an amplified perceived societal threat framed through moral danger."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A group or issue is framed as an urgent existential, contaminating, corrupting, or civilizational threat.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Media-cycle and moral-entrepreneur amplification produce rapid, disproportionate fear beyond the evidence base.", "role_mapping": "Concern -> societal fear; information lag -> disproportionality.", "slug": "moral_panic", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b041_a15_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Public concern is spreading faster than verifiable information. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Public concern is spreading faster than verifiable information."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Moral Panic", "one_liner": "Amplified societal fear.", "page_ref": "prime:moral_panic", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Concern -> societal fear; information lag -> disproportionality.", "slug": "moral_panic", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Media-cycle and moral-entrepreneur amplification produce rapid, disproportionate fear beyond the evidence base."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Public concern spreads faster than verified information and becomes disproportionate to available evidence.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Consensus, hostility, volatility, and disproportionality generate excessive social-control demands against the perceived threat.", "role_mapping": "Sweeping response -> disproportionate sanction; unstable evidence -> rapid-onset volatility.", "slug": "moral_panic", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b041_a15_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: People are demanding sweeping punishment, bans, exclusion, or emergency measures before the evidence base is stable. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["People are demanding sweeping punishment, bans, exclusion, or emergency measures before the evidence base is stable."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Moral Panic", "one_liner": "Amplified societal fear.", "page_ref": "prime:moral_panic", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Sweeping response -> disproportionate sanction; unstable evidence -> rapid-onset volatility.", "slug": "moral_panic", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Consensus, hostility, volatility, and disproportionality generate excessive social-control demands against the perceived threat."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Sweeping punishment, bans, exclusion, or emergency measures are demanded before evidence stabilizes.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The folk-devil construction is a mandatory marked target for amplified societal fear.", "role_mapping": "Symbolic target -> folk devil; collective blame -> hostility.", "slug": "moral_panic", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "Diffuse strain is displaced onto a marked substitute target selected for visibility or weakness rather than causal guilt.", "role_mapping": "Category -> scapegoat target; blame -> displaced collective burden.", "slug": "scapegoating", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b041_a15_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A category of people, role, practice, technology, or identity label is becoming a symbolic target. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A category of people, role, practice, technology, or identity label is becoming a symbolic target."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Moral Panic", "one_liner": "Amplified societal fear.", "page_ref": "prime:moral_panic", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Symbolic target -> folk devil; collective blame -> hostility.", "slug": "moral_panic", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The folk-devil construction is a mandatory marked target for amplified societal fear."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Scapegoating", "one_liner": "Channeling collective blame onto a substitute target.", "page_ref": "prime:scapegoating", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Category -> scapegoat target; blame -> displaced collective burden.", "slug": "scapegoating", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Diffuse strain is displaced onto a marked substitute target selected for visibility or weakness rather than causal guilt."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A category of people, practice, technology, role, or identity becomes a symbolic target for collective blame.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Leaders or platforms face pressure to say something quickly but risk amplifying the claim by repeating it.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Leaders or platforms face pressure to say something quickly but risk amplifying the claim by repeating it. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Leaders or platforms face pressure to say something quickly but risk amplifying the claim by repeating it."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Leaders or platforms face pressure to say something quickly but risk amplifying the claim by repeating it."}, {"display_text": "There may be a real concern inside the exaggerated narrative.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The panic may contain a real concern, but the collective response becomes poorly calibrated. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: There may be a real concern inside the exaggerated narrative. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["There may be a real concern inside the exaggerated narrative.", "The panic may contain a real concern, but the collective response becomes poorly calibrated."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "There may be a real concern inside the exaggerated narrative."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 41, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-041", "ledger_sha256": "672ab11f3edf16b49307a391eafbdd179b6f11ca9c2b493acd29ca2ad6b6e13e"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Moving-Target Tracking", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:moving_target_tracking", "slug": "moving_target_tracking"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The reference, objective, demand state, or effective success condition moves on a timescale comparable to or faster than the system’s complete convergence loop. Work is therefore evaluated against a different target from the one that initiated it, and ordinary steady-state error metrics obscure accumulated lag, rework, version mismatch, and infeasibility.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "The reference, objective, demand state, or effective success condition moves on a timescale comparable to or faster than the system’s complete convergence loop. Work is therefore evaluated against a different target from the one that initiated it, and ordinary steady-state error metrics obscure accumulated lag, rework, version mismatch, and infeasibility."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The reference updates faster than the complete tracking loop can settle, creating inevitable lag and stale work.", "role_mapping": "Target -> reference; complete loop -> tracking system; material change -> update cadence.", "slug": "reference_cadence_exceeds_tracking_bandwidth", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b042_a01_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The target changes materially before the system can sense, decide, act, and verify convergence. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The target changes materially before the system can sense, decide, act, and verify convergence."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Reference Cadence Exceeds Tracking Bandwidth", "one_liner": "When the signal a closed loop must track changes faster than the loop's bandwidth, persistent error follows that no amount of executor effort can close.", "page_ref": "prime:reference_cadence_exceeds_tracking_bandwidth", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Target -> reference; complete loop -> tracking system; material change -> update cadence.", "slug": "reference_cadence_exceeds_tracking_bandwidth", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The reference updates faster than the complete tracking loop can settle, creating inevitable lag and stale work."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The target changes materially faster than the full sensing, decision, action, and verification loop can converge.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P081-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a target-update message and its arrival event.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An update changes or communicates a target and arrives for downstream use.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail uncertainty about when the update will arrive.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The update's arrival time is uncertain.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "A target update arrives at an uncertain time.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "target-update arrival timing is uncertain", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P081-C14-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P081-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the target update and the authority under which it would govern the target.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An arriving update purports to change or communicate a target and has an issuing authority role.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail unresolved authority rather than clearly authorized or clearly unauthorized status.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Whether the update has valid authority is uncertain.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "A target update arrives with uncertain authority.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "target-update authority is uncertain", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P081-C14-U2"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P081-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the target update and its source or lineage role.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An arriving update purports to change or communicate a target and has an origin or transmission history.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail uncertain provenance rather than merely an unknown author with otherwise verified lineage.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The update's origin or transmission history cannot be established with confidence.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "A target update arrives with uncertain provenance.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "target-update provenance is uncertain", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P081-C14-U3"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P081-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the target update and the date from which it is meant to apply.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An arriving update changes or communicates a target that has an effective date.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail uncertainty about applicability onset, not uncertainty only about message arrival.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The date from which the update should govern is uncertain.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "A target update arrives with an uncertain effective date.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "target-update effective date is uncertain", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P081-C14-U4"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Evidence fidelity decay concerns degradation through handling, not target-version governance.", "slug": "evidence_fidelity_decay"}], "residual_id": "r:moving_target_tracking:b042_a01_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b042_a01_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Target updates arrive with uncertain timing, authority, provenance, or effective date. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Target updates arrive with uncertain timing, authority, provenance, or effective date."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 4, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 4}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Evidence fidelity decay concerns degradation through handling, not target-version governance.", "slug": "evidence_fidelity_decay"}], "normalized_requirement": "Target updates have uncertain timing, authority, provenance, or effective date.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 4 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Target updates have uncertain timing, authority, provenance, or effective date.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A once-calibrated rule loses fit as the world it governs changes beneath it.", "role_mapping": "Rule -> calibrated rule; environment or relation -> moving world; stale -> calibration mismatch.", "slug": "calibrated_rule_vs_moving_world", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b042_a01_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: An environment or input–outcome relation moves so that a previously calibrated rule becomes stale. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["An environment or input–outcome relation moves so that a previously calibrated rule becomes stale."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Calibrated Rule versus Moving World", "one_liner": "A rule, model, or policy fitted to a past distribution of the world degrades as the world it was calibrated on drifts away from that distribution.", "page_ref": "prime:calibrated_rule_vs_moving_world", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Rule -> calibrated rule; environment or relation -> moving world; stale -> calibration mismatch.", "slug": "calibrated_rule_vs_moving_world", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A once-calibrated rule loses fit as the world it governs changes beneath it."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A calibrated rule becomes stale because its environment or input-outcome relation moves.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "When reference cadence exceeds tracking bandwidth, response necessarily trails the target with accumulating error.", "role_mapping": "Latency -> tracking delay; actuator limit -> finite bandwidth; phase lag -> tracking error.", "slug": "reference_cadence_exceeds_tracking_bandwidth", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b042_a01_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Response latency or limited actuator capacity creates a persistent phase lag behind the target. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Response latency or limited actuator capacity creates a persistent phase lag behind the target."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Reference Cadence Exceeds Tracking Bandwidth", "one_liner": "When the signal a closed loop must track changes faster than the loop's bandwidth, persistent error follows that no amount of executor effort can close.", "page_ref": "prime:reference_cadence_exceeds_tracking_bandwidth", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Latency -> tracking delay; actuator limit -> finite bandwidth; phase lag -> tracking error.", "slug": "reference_cadence_exceeds_tracking_bandwidth", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "When reference cadence exceeds tracking bandwidth, response necessarily trails the target with accumulating error."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Finite sensing or actuation bandwidth produces a persistent phase lag behind the moving target.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P081-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve multiple dependent actors rather than one isolated adopter.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Several actors depend on the same objective.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve one common moving objective and actor-specific adoption or version roles.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The actors each maintain or act from a version of one shared objective that changes over time.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail adoption necessity rather than optional awareness of the objective.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Each dependent actor is required to adopt the moving objective.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail heterogeneous update schedules across the dependent actors.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The actors update their adopted objective versions at different cadences.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Several dependent actors must adopt the same moving objective but update their local versions at different cadences.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "dependent actors adopt one moving objective at different cadences", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P081-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A nonstationary objective can be consumed by one actor or updated synchronously by all actors.", "slug": "non_stationary_objective"}], "residual_id": "r:moving_target_tracking:b042_a01_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b042_a01_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Several dependent actors must adopt the same moving objective but update at different cadences. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Several dependent actors must adopt the same moving objective but update at different cadences."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A nonstationary objective can be consumed by one actor or updated synchronously by all actors.", "slug": "non_stationary_objective"}], "normalized_requirement": "Dependent actors adopt versions of the same moving objective at different cadences.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Dependent actors adopt versions of the same moving objective at different cadences.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Some target movement is exogenous while some is discretionary and governable.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The system must remain responsive to legitimate change without converting every fluctuation or discretionary revision into destabilizing churn; it must preserve execution coherence and protected invariants while acknowledging that a fixed-target steady state may not exist. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Some target movement is exogenous while some is discretionary and governable. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Some target movement is exogenous while some is discretionary and governable.", "The system must remain responsive to legitimate change without converting every fluctuation or discretionary revision into destabilizing churn; it must preserve execution coherence and protected invariants while acknowledging that a fixed-target steady state may not exist."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Some target movement is exogenous while some is discretionary and governable."}, {"display_text": "Irreversible or high-cost actions require commitment despite future target uncertainty.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: Irreversible or high-cost actions require commitment despite future target uncertainty. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Irreversible or high-cost actions require commitment despite future target uncertainty."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "Irreversible or high-cost actions require commitment despite future target uncertainty."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 42, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-042", "ledger_sha256": "7cff4e683ef421ac426f7b0e49659b61b89057de80c5337ace7ed446446bb42e"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Multi-Dimensional Solution Space Exploration", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:multi_dimensional_solution_space_exploration", "slug": "multi_dimensional_solution_space_exploration"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 1, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A design, strategy, or problem-solving process enters convergence after exploring only a narrow slice of the possible solution space, usually because one dominant dimension, stakeholder preference, constraint, analogy, metric, or implementation path silently frames what counts as a viable option.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A design, strategy, or problem-solving process enters convergence after exploring only a narrow slice of the possible solution space, usually because one dominant dimension, stakeholder preference, constraint, analogy, metric, or implementation path silently frames what counts as a viable option."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P082-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve both the early divergent process and the solution-family destination roles.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A focal design or problem-solving process is in an early divergent phase and has a candidate solution family.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail directional narrowing toward a family rather than mere awareness of it.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The process is gravitating or converging toward that solution family.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve convergence as premature relative to the process's still-divergent stage.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The convergence is already occurring during the early divergent phase.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail narrowing to a single family rather than continued exploration across multiple families.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The convergence is restricted to one solution family.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}], "predicate": "An early divergent process is already converging on one solution family.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "early divergence prematurely narrows toward one solution family", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P082-C01-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A divergence-convergence process can preserve wide divergence until its planned convergence point.", "slug": "divergence_convergence_in_the_design_process"}], "residual_id": "r:multi_dimensional_solution_space_exploration:b042_a02_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b042_a02_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The team is in an early divergent phase but is already gravitating toward one solution family. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The team is in an early divergent phase but is already gravitating toward one solution family."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Attempted a complete golden_hammer_anti_pattern instance under the mapping while falsifying a source obligation; the exact mandatory structure closes every DNF obligation.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Golden Hammer Anti-Pattern", "one_liner": "Diagnose a team applying its familiar technology to a poorly-fitting problem because the acquisition cost of an alternative is visible while the misfit cost is diffuse and downstream, so fluency reshapes what counts as the right tool before fit is ever asked.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:golden_hammer_anti_pattern", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "golden_hammer_anti_pattern"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "golden_hammer_anti_pattern", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P082-C01-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact inertial-selection mechanism chooses one acquired capability for a new problem before fit is asked, directly instantiating premature early narrowing to one solution family. B's subtype-preserving mapping satisfies O1-O4; A's one-line veto missed that exact structure."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "An early divergent process is already converging on one solution family.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A dimension is one axis and does not entail several independent axes in one design problem.", "slug": "dimension"}], "residual_id": "r:multi_dimensional_solution_space_exploration:b042_a02_c2", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b042_a02_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The problem has several meaningful dimensions, such as user segment, function, form, channel, cost, risk, material, schedule, governance, or lifecycle effect. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The problem has several meaningful dimensions, such as user segment, function, form, channel, cost, risk, material, schedule, governance, or lifecycle effect."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A dimension is one axis and does not entail several independent axes in one design problem.", "slug": "dimension"}], "normalized_requirement": "The problem has several independent and decision-relevant design dimensions.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The problem has several independent and decision-relevant design dimensions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P082-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve multiple stakeholder evaluators and the dimensions on which they optimize.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Multiple stakeholders each evaluate or optimize the focal choice along an objective dimension.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail stakeholder-to-objective optimization rather than mere possession of different opinions.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Each stakeholder optimizes along that stakeholder's own dimension.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve cross-stakeholder difference in optimization axes.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The dimensions optimized by the stakeholders differ from one another.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail that the relevant axes remain implicit rather than openly declared.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The stakeholders do not make their optimization axes explicit.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail the axis mismatch as a cause of disagreement, not merely contemporaneous context.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The different implicit axes cause the stakeholder disagreement.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Stakeholders disagree because each person optimizes a different dimension without making the axis explicit.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "implicit differences in optimization axes cause stakeholder disagreement", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P082-C02-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "No-free-lunch concerns performance averaged across problem classes, not stakeholder disagreement over unnamed axes.", "slug": "no_free_lunch_theorem"}], "residual_id": "r:multi_dimensional_solution_space_exploration:b042_a02_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b042_a02_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Stakeholders disagree because each person is optimizing a different dimension without making the axis explicit. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders disagree because each person is optimizing a different dimension without making the axis explicit."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "No-free-lunch concerns performance averaged across problem classes, not stakeholder disagreement over unnamed axes.", "slug": "no_free_lunch_theorem"}], "normalized_requirement": "Stakeholders optimize different implicit dimensions and therefore disagree.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Stakeholders optimize different implicit dimensions and therefore disagree.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact problem has several objective functions and a Pareto trade-off rather than one universally best solution.", "role_mapping": "Design dimensions -> objectives; later trade-offs -> Pareto frontier.", "slug": "multiobjective_optimization", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b042_a02_c4a", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A solution is being designed under multiobjective constraints where trade-offs will matter later, but early exploration must still remain broad. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A solution is being designed under multiobjective constraints where trade-offs will matter later, but early exploration must still remain broad."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Multiobjective Optimization", "one_liner": "Balance competing objectives.", "page_ref": "prime:multiobjective_optimization", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Design dimensions -> objectives; later trade-offs -> Pareto frontier.", "slug": "multiobjective_optimization", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact problem has several objective functions and a Pareto trade-off rather than one universally best solution."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The solution must balance multiple objectives whose trade-offs cannot all be optimized independently.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P082-C03", "dnf": [], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [], "predicate": "The organization has a history of premature commitment, local-optimum selection, or repeated variants of the same design idea.", "resolution": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RESIDUAL", "semantic_scope": "NON_ABSTRACTION", "structural_head": "organization has a recurring history of narrow design outcomes", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P082-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The design process does not entail a history of premature commitment.", "slug": "divergence_convergence_in_the_design_process"}], "residual_id": "r:multi_dimensional_solution_space_exploration:b042_a02_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b042_a02_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The organization has a history of premature commitment, local-optimum selection, or repeated variants of the same design idea. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The organization has a history of premature commitment, local-optimum selection, or repeated variants of the same design idea."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RECLASSIFIED", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 1, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The design process does not entail a history of premature commitment.", "slug": "divergence_convergence_in_the_design_process"}], "normalized_requirement": "The organization repeatedly commits prematurely or generates variants within one design family.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RECLASSIFIED", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later candidate-blind atomization classified this remainder as a threshold, parameter, materiality test, or other non-abstraction rather than a catalog gap."}, "predicate": "The organization repeatedly commits prematurely or generates variants within one design family.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The design space is too large to explore exhaustively but too consequential to leave to unguided brainstorming.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A design, strategy, or problem-solving process enters convergence after exploring only a narrow slice of the possible solution space, usually because one dominant dimension, stakeholder preference, constraint, analogy, metric, or implementation path silently frames what counts as a viable option. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: The design space is too large to explore exhaustively but too consequential to leave to unguided brainstorming. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The design space is too large to explore exhaustively but too consequential to leave to unguided brainstorming.", "A design, strategy, or problem-solving process enters convergence after exploring only a narrow slice of the possible solution space, usually because one dominant dimension, stakeholder preference, constraint, analogy, metric, or implementation path silently frames what counts as a viable option."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The design space is too large to explore exhaustively but too consequential to leave to unguided brainstorming."}, {"display_text": "A later convergence process, stage gate, feasibility review, or portfolio choice needs a more diverse option set.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A design, strategy, or problem-solving process enters convergence after exploring only a narrow slice of the possible solution space, usually because one dominant dimension, stakeholder preference, constraint, analogy, metric, or implementation path silently frames what counts as a viable option. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: A later convergence process, stage gate, feasibility review, or portfolio choice needs a more diverse option set. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A later convergence process, stage gate, feasibility review, or portfolio choice needs a more diverse option set.", "A design, strategy, or problem-solving process enters convergence after exploring only a narrow slice of the possible solution space, usually because one dominant dimension, stakeholder preference, constraint, analogy, metric, or implementation path silently frames what counts as a viable option."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "A later convergence process, stage gate, feasibility review, or portfolio choice needs a more diverse option set."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 42, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-042", "ledger_sha256": "7cff4e683ef421ac426f7b0e49659b61b89057de80c5337ace7ed446446bb42e"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Multi-Scale Signal Monitoring", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:multi_scale_signal_monitoring", "slug": "multi_scale_signal_monitoring"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a scale mismatch in observation. The system is monitored at one level while the meaningful change begins, clusters, or becomes actionable at another level.\n\nCommon forms include aggregate masking, where averages hide vulnerable local clusters; local noise overload, where every site-level anomaly looks urgent; and scale-disconnected monitoring, where local, regional, and system-level dashboards exist but do not share definitions, rollup logic, or escalation rules. The result is delayed detection, poor triage, and disagreement about whether a signal is local, systemic, or merely an artifact of measurement.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Single-scale monitoring misses important change because the signal either begins locally before it is visible in aggregate, appears only as a system-level shift after local traces have been averaged away, or becomes meaningful only when patterns across levels are compared."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Aggregate statistics and conclusions depend on partition, so stable totals can conceal divergent local behavior.", "role_mapping": "Dashboard aggregate -> aggregate statistic; local units -> partition cells; hidden variation -> partition dependence.", "slug": "partition_dependence_of_aggregates", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b042_a03_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Aggregate dashboards look stable while local units, sites, cohorts, or neighborhoods show unusual variation. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Aggregate dashboards look stable while local units, sites, cohorts, or neighborhoods show unusual variation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Partition Dependence of Aggregates", "one_liner": "Any statistic computed on partition-aggregated data is a function of the partition itself, not solely of the underlying data.", "page_ref": "prime:partition_dependence_of_aggregates", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Dashboard aggregate -> aggregate statistic; local units -> partition cells; hidden variation -> partition dependence.", "slug": "partition_dependence_of_aggregates", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Aggregate statistics and conclusions depend on partition, so stable totals can conceal divergent local behavior."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Aggregate stability can coexist with unusual variation inside local units or partitions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P082-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the team, local-alarm, and broader-system-movement roles.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Teams receive local alarms and assess them for broader system-level meaning.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve frequent alarm occurrence rather than an isolated local alarm.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The local alarms fire frequently.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the local-to-broader indicator relation rather than a same-scale alarm interpretation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Local alarms are assessed as possible indicators of broader system movement.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail missing discrimination among the alarms, not a reliable escalation rule.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The teams cannot determine which local alarms carry that broader-system meaning.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Local alarms fire frequently, but teams cannot determine which alarms indicate broader system movement.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "teams cannot distinguish local alarms that signal broader system movement", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P082-C04-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Monitoring can include well-calibrated escalation rules and does not entail ambiguous alarms.", "slug": "monitoring"}], "residual_id": "r:multi_scale_signal_monitoring:b042_a03_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b042_a03_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Local alarms fire frequently, but teams cannot tell which ones indicate broader system movement. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Local alarms fire frequently, but teams cannot tell which ones indicate broader system movement."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_SYNTHESIS", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A complete single-clinician alarm-fatigue instance fails O1, but the collective-operator guard excludes it; the warning-channel, broader warned condition, frequency, and discrimination failure remain exact-record necessities.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Alarm Fatigue", "one_liner": "Reframe an operator's habitual silencing of clinical alarms as the rational response to a warning channel whose predictive value has collapsed, relocating the fix from the operator's discipline to the channel's specificity.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:alarm_fatigue", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "QUANTIFIER_BINDING", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "alarm_operators_collectively_form_assessing_team", "predicate": "Multiple finite-capacity alarm operators collectively constitute the assessing team.", "rationale": "The retained expression preserves principal roles and direction, satisfies one complete DNF branch, and uses no laundering qualifier."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "alarm_fatigue"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "alarm_operators_collectively_form_assessing_team"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "alarm_fatigue", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P082-C04-U1", "why_it_fits": "Both readers identify the same alarm-fatigue spine. The synthesized guard preserves B's one-gap analysis while replacing the invalid singular operator-is-team wording with one candidate-anchored cardinality binding; O2-O4 remain directly entailed."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Frequent local alarms lack a rule for distinguishing isolated noise from broader system movement.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P082-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve nested system levels and their corresponding indicators.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A system has nested levels with indicators associated with those levels.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail level-partitioned collection rather than integrated cross-level collection.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Indicators from the nested levels are collected in separate streams or processes.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Indicators at nested system levels are collected separately.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "nested-level indicators are collected in separate streams", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P082-C05-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P082-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the nested-level indicator and interpreting-owner roles.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A system has nested levels, indicators associated with those levels, and owners who interpret indicators.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail distinct interpretation ownership across levels rather than one shared interpreter.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Indicators at the nested levels are interpreted by different owners.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Indicators at nested system levels are interpreted by different owners.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "nested-level indicators have different interpreting owners", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P082-C05-U2"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Scale does not entail monitoring ownership or separately collected indicators.", "slug": "scale"}], "residual_id": "r:multi_scale_signal_monitoring:b042_a03_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b042_a03_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A system has nested levels whose indicators are collected separately and interpreted by different owners. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A system has nested levels whose indicators are collected separately and interpreted by different owners."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 2, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 2}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Scale does not entail monitoring ownership or separately collected indicators.", "slug": "scale"}], "normalized_requirement": "Nested levels collect indicators separately under different owners.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 2 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Nested levels collect indicators separately under different owners.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P082-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the local weak-signal and global strong-signal stages of the warning process.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A developing signal has a weak local manifestation and a stronger global manifestation relevant to warning.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail local-before-global ordering rather than simultaneous or globally first visibility.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The weak local manifestation occurs and is observable before the strong global manifestation.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve actual visibility or observation of the local precursor, not its unobserved existence.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The weak local manifestation is observed for warning purposes.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail the observation as necessary for early warning in the case, not merely helpful context.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Obtaining early warning depends on observing that local precursor before global strengthening.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "Early warning depends on observing weak local signals before they become strong global signals.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "early warning depends on observing a weak local precursor before global strengthening", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P082-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Weak signals can be diffuse and need not be local precursors of an aggregate signal.", "slug": "weak_signals_emerging_issues"}], "residual_id": "r:multi_scale_signal_monitoring:b042_a03_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b042_a03_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Early warning depends on seeing weak local signals before they become strong global signals. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Early warning depends on seeing weak local signals before they become strong global signals."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Weak signals can be diffuse and need not be local precursors of an aggregate signal.", "slug": "weak_signals_emerging_issues"}], "normalized_requirement": "Early warning depends on weak local signals becoming visible before aggregate strengthening.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Early warning depends on weak local signals becoming visible before aggregate strengthening.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Successive reporting layers systematically filter weak or inconvenient events, leaving leadership with an understated aggregate.", "role_mapping": "Frontline signals -> base reports; leadership metrics -> pyramid apex; hidden risk -> undercount.", "slug": "reporting_pyramid_undercount", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b042_a03_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Leadership acts on top-level metrics while frontline teams see risks that are not visible upward. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Leadership acts on top-level metrics while frontline teams see risks that are not visible upward."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Reporting-Pyramid Undercount", "one_liner": "A true event population passes through ordered, non-random reporting filters whose layerwise capture rates multiply, so the recorded count is a biased fraction and changes in any filter can masquerade as changes in incidence.", "page_ref": "prime:reporting_pyramid_undercount", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Frontline signals -> base reports; leadership metrics -> pyramid apex; hidden risk -> undercount.", "slug": "reporting_pyramid_undercount", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Successive reporting layers systematically filter weak or inconvenient events, leaving leadership with an understated aggregate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Frontline observations reveal risks that leadership's top-level metrics do not expose.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Changing partition or aggregation can reverse or conceal subgroup patterns relative to the total.", "role_mapping": "Aggregate improvement -> total statistic; subgroup deterioration -> partition-specific result.", "slug": "partition_dependence_of_aggregates", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b042_a03_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Local improvements may mask regional deterioration, or aggregate improvement may hide vulnerable subgroups. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Local improvements may mask regional deterioration, or aggregate improvement may hide vulnerable subgroups."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Partition Dependence of Aggregates", "one_liner": "Any statistic computed on partition-aggregated data is a function of the partition itself, not solely of the underlying data.", "page_ref": "prime:partition_dependence_of_aggregates", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Aggregate improvement -> total statistic; subgroup deterioration -> partition-specific result.", "slug": "partition_dependence_of_aggregates", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Changing partition or aggregation can reverse or conceal subgroup patterns relative to the total."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A favorable aggregate can conceal deterioration in a region or vulnerable subgroup, or vice versa.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The cost of false alarms is high enough that cross-scale confirmation rules are needed.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "In all of these domains, single-scale visibility can be misleading: either it creates alert fatigue from local noise or it creates false confidence from smooth aggregate averages. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: The cost of false alarms is high enough that cross-scale confirmation rules are needed. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The cost of false alarms is high enough that cross-scale confirmation rules are needed.", "In all of these domains, single-scale visibility can be misleading: either it creates alert fatigue from local noise or it creates false confidence from smooth aggregate averages."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "The cost of false alarms is high enough that cross-scale confirmation rules are needed."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 42, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-042", "ledger_sha256": "7cff4e683ef421ac426f7b0e49659b61b89057de80c5337ace7ed446446bb42e"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Multifunction Carrier Consolidation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:multifunction_carrier_consolidation", "slug": "multifunction_carrier_consolidation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 2 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 2}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Distinct functions are assigned to separate objects, layers, surfaces, channels, or structures in substantially the same system region or lifecycle, causing duplicated carrier capacity, interfaces, mass, volume, alignment, assembly, custody, or maintenance burden.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Separate carriers deliver distinct functions in the same region or lifecycle, creating material duplicated carrier and interface burden."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "This branch preserves the complete remedy-free diagnostic route; goals, feasibility clauses, gates, deployment constraints, and supporting context remain outside the DNF."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "EXT001-C064", "dnf": [["EXT001-U064-O1"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"obligation_id": "EXT001-U064-O1", "predicate": "Separate carriers deliver distinct functions in substantially the same region or lifecycle."}], "predicate": "Separate carriers deliver distinct functions in substantially the same region or lifecycle.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Separate carriers deliver distinct functions in substantially the same region or lifecycle.", "unit_id": "EXT001-U064"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"catalog_exhaustion": "CONDITION_LEVEL", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Separate carriers deliver distinct functions in substantially the same region or lifecycle.", "slug": "diversity"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Separate carriers deliver distinct functions in substantially the same region or lifecycle.", "slug": "specialization"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Separate carriers deliver distinct functions in substantially the same region or lifecycle.", "slug": "trade_offs"}], "residual_id": "EXT001:multifunction_carrier_consolidation:C01", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding."}}, "condition_id": "ext001_multifunction_carrier_consolidation_a01", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Distinct functions are assigned to separate objects, layers, surfaces, channels, or structures in substantially the same system region or lifecycle, causing duplicated carrier capacity, interfaces, mass, volume, alignment, assembly, custody, or maintenance burden. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Separate carriers deliver distinct functions in substantially the same region or lifecycle.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Separate carriers deliver distinct functions in substantially the same region or lifecycle.", "Distinct functions are assigned to separate objects, layers, surfaces, channels, or structures in substantially the same system region or lifecycle, causing duplicated carrier capacity, interfaces, mass, volume, alignment, assembly, custody, or maintenance burden."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Separate carriers deliver distinct functions in substantially the same region or lifecycle.", "slug": "diversity"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Separate carriers deliver distinct functions in substantially the same region or lifecycle.", "slug": "specialization"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Separate carriers deliver distinct functions in substantially the same region or lifecycle.", "slug": "trade_offs"}], "normalized_requirement": "Separate carriers deliver distinct functions in substantially the same region or lifecycle.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Separate carriers deliver distinct functions in substantially the same region or lifecycle.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "EXT001-C065", "dnf": [["EXT001-U065-O1"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"obligation_id": "EXT001-U065-O1", "predicate": "Duplicated carrier and interface burden is material to performance or cost."}], "predicate": "Duplicated carrier and interface burden is material to performance or cost.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Duplicated carrier and interface burden is material to performance or cost.", "unit_id": "EXT001-U065"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"catalog_exhaustion": "CONDITION_LEVEL", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Duplicated carrier and interface burden is material to performance or cost.", "slug": "boundary_state_loss"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Duplicated carrier and interface burden is material to performance or cost.", "slug": "precomputation_and_materialization"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Duplicated carrier and interface burden is material to performance or cost.", "slug": "biofouling"}], "residual_id": "EXT001:multifunction_carrier_consolidation:C02", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding."}}, "condition_id": "ext001_multifunction_carrier_consolidation_a02", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The duplicated carrier and interface burden is material to system performance or cost. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The duplicated carrier and interface burden is material to system performance or cost."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Duplicated carrier and interface burden is material to performance or cost.", "slug": "boundary_state_loss"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Duplicated carrier and interface burden is material to performance or cost.", "slug": "precomputation_and_materialization"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Duplicated carrier and interface burden is material to performance or cost.", "slug": "biofouling"}], "normalized_requirement": "Duplicated carrier and interface burden is material to performance or cost.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Duplicated carrier and interface burden is material to performance or cost.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "At least one carrier could bear several independently stated role contracts.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source states: At least one carrier could plausibly bear several independently stated role contracts. The normalized feasibility condition is: At least one carrier could bear several independently stated role contracts. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["At least one carrier could plausibly bear several independently stated role contracts."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "At least one carrier could bear several independently stated role contracts."}, {"display_text": "Joint operation and degraded states can be tested and bounded.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this deployment constraint: Joint operation and degraded states can be tested and bounded. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Joint operation and degraded states can be tested and bounded."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Joint operation and degraded states can be tested and bounded."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"candidate_ledger_sha256": "96f72d2139077fd57bf795048ebef33b3fd574b20963170080ec916b5b3b92fe", "extension_id": "new-archetypes-extension-001", "ledger_id": "prime-production-v1.2-extension-001", "ledger_sha256": "9644520614744632d1d36da44b1acd77ce432852c6083eb871203521c166efce"}, "base_projection_sha256": "841e0c7f3cb8e8054475ad29a8a14745a416b4fc115559a44878b94292e673ec", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "ca09ed9fe1598ce7072755b530de5553f5ee0a7cd64ae82d9e4a4e2149a37788", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Multiple Causation and Explanatory Pluralism", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:multiple_causation_and_explanatory_pluralism", "slug": "multiple_causation_and_explanatory_pluralism"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A complex event, change, or outcome is being compressed into a single deterministic cause, obscuring the interaction of forces at different scales and making the explanation brittle, partisan, or misleading.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A complex event, change, or outcome is being compressed into a single deterministic cause, obscuring the interaction of forces at different scales and making the explanation brittle, partisan, or misleading."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Causality can involve one sufficient cause and does not entail plural causal families.", "slug": "causality"}], "residual_id": "r:multiple_causation_and_explanatory_pluralism:b042_a04_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b042_a04_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Several plausible causal families can explain part of the outcome. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Several plausible causal families can explain part of the outcome."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Causality can involve one sufficient cause and does not entail plural causal families.", "slug": "causality"}], "normalized_requirement": "Several distinct causal families each explain part of the outcome.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Several distinct causal families each explain part of the outcome.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Historical outcomes are represented as necessary products of one law-like trajectory, erasing contingency and plural causation.", "role_mapping": "Outcome -> historical event; master force -> deterministic process; inevitable -> necessity claim.", "slug": "historical_determinism", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "Complex historical outcomes are attributed primarily to a singular exceptional actor rather than distributed conditions.", "role_mapping": "One actor -> great individual; outcome -> historical change; causal compression -> actor-centered attribution.", "slug": "great_man_theory", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b042_a04_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The dominant account makes an outcome appear inevitable, natural, or caused by one actor or force alone. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The dominant account makes an outcome appear inevitable, natural, or caused by one actor or force alone."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Historical Determinism", "one_liner": "Events predetermined.", "page_ref": "prime:historical_determinism", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Outcome -> historical event; master force -> deterministic process; inevitable -> necessity claim.", "slug": "historical_determinism", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Historical outcomes are represented as necessary products of one law-like trajectory, erasing contingency and plural causation."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Great Man Theory", "one_liner": "Individuals drive history.", "page_ref": "prime:great_man_theory", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "One actor -> great individual; outcome -> historical change; causal compression -> actor-centered attribution.", "slug": "great_man_theory", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Complex historical outcomes are attributed primarily to a singular exceptional actor rather than distributed conditions."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A dominant explanation makes the outcome inevitable or attributes it to one actor or master force.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Macro behavior arises from interactions among lower-level components and cannot be reduced to any component alone.", "role_mapping": "Individual choices -> micro components; institutions or markets -> macro pattern; interaction -> emergence.", "slug": "emergence", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b042_a04_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Evidence appears at multiple scales, such as individual choices, institutions, markets, technologies, norms, and chance events. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Evidence appears at multiple scales, such as individual choices, institutions, markets, technologies, norms, and chance events."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Emergence", "one_liner": "Complex patterns from simple rules.", "page_ref": "prime:emergence", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Individual choices -> micro components; institutions or markets -> macro pattern; interaction -> emergence.", "slug": "emergence", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Macro behavior arises from interactions among lower-level components and cannot be reduced to any component alone."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Causal evidence spans interacting micro and macro levels such as individuals, institutions, markets, technologies, norms, and chance.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Participants disagree because each side highlights a different real factor.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Participants disagree because each side highlights a different real factor. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Participants disagree because each side highlights a different real factor."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "Participants disagree because each side highlights a different real factor."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 42, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-042", "ledger_sha256": "7cff4e683ef421ac426f7b0e49659b61b89057de80c5337ace7ed446446bb42e"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Multiple-Testing Discipline", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:multiple_testing_discipline", "slug": "multiple_testing_discipline"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 2, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "When many tests are tried, chance has many opportunities to produce an impressive-looking pattern. If the failed, null, or unreported comparisons disappear from view, the remaining selected result looks more surprising than it really is. This is the structural source of p-hacking, metric shopping, subgroup fishing, data dredging, repeated interim looks, and overfitting to validation evidence.\n\nThe problem is not simply that people use a p-value, a threshold, or a dashboard. The problem is that the evidentiary context of the selected result is incomplete. A single result is being interpreted without the family of attempts that generated it. Multiple-Testing Discipline restores that missing context.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system runs, inspects, or informally considers many tests, comparisons, metrics, groups, models, or stories, but reports the most appealing result as though it came from one pre-specified test. The more opportunities there are for a chance pattern, the easier it becomes to mistake noise for evidence."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The correction problem exists only because a family of multiple simultaneous tests inflates false-discovery probability.", "role_mapping": "Many hypotheses -> test family; tested metrics -> comparisons.", "slug": "multiple_comparisons_correction", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b042_a05_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Many hypotheses, outcomes, subgroups, time windows, thresholds, features, treatments, or metrics are being tested or inspected. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Many hypotheses, outcomes, subgroups, time windows, thresholds, features, treatments, or metrics are being tested or inspected."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Multiple Comparisons Correction", "one_liner": "Adjust the thresholds or p-values of a defined family of simultaneous tests so a chosen family-level error criterion remains bounded despite multiplicity.", "page_ref": "prime:multiple_comparisons_correction", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Many hypotheses -> test family; tested metrics -> comparisons.", "slug": "multiple_comparisons_correction", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The correction problem exists only because a family of multiple simultaneous tests inflates false-discovery probability."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Many hypotheses, outcomes, subgroups, windows, thresholds, features, treatments, or metrics are tested.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P082-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the evidence, alternative-result set, and selected reported-result roles.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An analyst has evidence, several alternative results, and one result that is reported.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail examination across multiple alternatives rather than a single fixed analysis.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Several alternatives are examined before the reported result is chosen.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve post-evidence result selection.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Selection of the reported result occurs after the alternatives and evidence have been examined.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail absence of pre-specification rather than a precommitted result later confirmed.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The reported result was not specified before the evidence was seen.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "A reported result is selected after several alternatives are examined rather than specified before the evidence is seen.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "result is selected post hoc from examined alternatives without pre-specification", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P082-C08-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Selection bias can arise in sampling before analysis and need not involve post-hoc result choice.", "slug": "selection_bias"}], "residual_id": "r:multiple_testing_discipline:b042_a05_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b042_a05_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A result was selected after looking across several alternatives rather than being specified before the evidence was seen. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A result was selected after looking across several alternatives rather than being specified before the evidence was seen."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "An honestly labeled exploratory hypothesis would preserve post-data generation but not the candidate's defining presentation as a priori, so it is not a complete HARKing instance.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "HARKing (Hypothesizing After the Results are Known)", "one_liner": "The research practice of building a hypothesis by inspecting already-collected data and then presenting it as if it had been specified in advance, silently inflating the reported false-positive rate because the test's independence assumption is violated.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:harking", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "harking"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "harking", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P082-C08-U1", "why_it_fits": "Both readers independently establish that every HARKing instance selects a result-shaped hypothesis after examining already-collected alternatives and reports it as pre-specified. The shared DIRECT classification is authoritative."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A reported result was selected after examining alternatives rather than pre-specified.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P082-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a single evidence resource whose identity persists across analyses.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "One identifiable evidence source is available for exploratory discovery.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail reuse of one source for exploratory discovery rather than independent fresh evidence for each attempt.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The same evidence source is used repeatedly for discovery attempts.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve multiplicity of discovery attempts rather than one isolated reuse.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The reuse supports many discovery attempts.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}], "predicate": "The same evidence source is reused for many discovery attempts.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "one evidence source supports repeated discovery attempts", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P082-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Reproducibility may use a dataset once and does not entail repeated exploratory reuse.", "slug": "reproducibility_replicability"}], "residual_id": "r:multiple_testing_discipline:b042_a05_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b042_a05_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The same dataset, dashboard, experiment, audit stream, or corpus is reused for many discovery attempts. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The same dataset, dashboard, experiment, audit stream, or corpus is reused for many discovery attempts."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Attempted a complete harking instance under the mapping while falsifying a source obligation; the single qualifier closes all nonfatal gaps in one complete DNF branch.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "HARKing (Hypothesizing After the Results are Known)", "one_liner": "The research practice of building a hypothesis by inspecting already-collected data and then presenting it as if it had been specified in advance, silently inflating the reported false-positive rate because the test's independence assumption is violated.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:harking", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2", "O3"], "guard_type": "QUANTIFIER_BINDING", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "post_hoc_inspection_examines_many_patterns", "predicate": "The post-hoc inspection examines many alternative patterns in the same dataset.", "rationale": "The retained expression preserves principal roles and direction, satisfies one complete DNF branch, and uses no laundering qualifier."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "harking"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "post_hoc_inspection_examines_many_patterns"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "harking", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P082-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record guarantees one flexible dataset and possible analyses, but possibility is not repeated actual discovery use. B correctly guards the existing post-hoc inspection to many patterns in that same dataset; A's DIRECT reading overstates the quantifier."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "One dataset, dashboard, experiment, audit stream, or corpus supports repeated discovery attempts.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P082-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O9"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5", "O9"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve team evaluators, a comparison set, and an action that advances a selected result.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Teams evaluate comparisons and can advance a selected comparison.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail selective reward based on the comparison's apparent status rather than neutral treatment of comparisons.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The incentive favors advancing whichever comparison meets an apparent selection criterion.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve appearance-based selection and must not require the comparison actually to be significant or favorable.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The criterion concerns how the comparison looks, whether or not it actually has that property.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This criterion branch is satisfied only when apparent significance selects the comparison.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The comparison looks significant.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This criterion branch is satisfied only when apparent favorability selects the comparison.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The comparison looks favorable.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This action branch is satisfied only when teams are rewarded for publishing the selected comparison.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The incentivized action is publication.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This action branch is satisfied only when teams are rewarded for shipping on the selected comparison.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The incentivized action is shipping.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This action branch is satisfied only when teams are rewarded for escalating the selected comparison.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The incentivized action is escalation.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This action branch is satisfied only when teams are rewarded for celebrating the selected comparison.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "The incentivized action is celebration.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Teams have incentives to publish, ship, escalate, or celebrate whichever comparison looks significant or favorable.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "incentives reward advancing comparisons that appear significant or favorable", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P082-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Goal alignment can remove rather than create selective-reporting incentives.", "slug": "goal_congruence_alignment"}], "residual_id": "r:multiple_testing_discipline:b042_a05_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b042_a05_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Teams have incentives to publish, ship, escalate, or celebrate whichever comparison looks significant or favorable. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Teams have incentives to publish, ship, escalate, or celebrate whichever comparison looks significant or favorable."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Goal alignment can remove rather than create selective-reporting incentives.", "slug": "goal_congruence_alignment"}], "normalized_requirement": "Institutional incentives reward whichever comparison appears favorable or significant.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Institutional incentives reward whichever comparison appears favorable or significant.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P082-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve multiple analytic actors and an analysis they can vary.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Multiple analysts or stakeholders can alter the analysis of a common evidential object.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail discretionary repeated analytic variation rather than one fixed analysis.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The actors can repeatedly change how the evidence is sliced, filtered, modeled, or framed.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve continuing analytic flexibility, not merely one prescribed adjustment.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The analytic process permits the actors to keep making such changes.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail a stopping condition tied to appearance of the preferred pattern.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The search can continue until a preferred pattern appears.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve preference-shaped pattern selection rather than a criterion fixed independently of the actors' preference.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The pattern that stops the search is selected for being preferred by an analyst or stakeholder.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Different analysts or stakeholders can repeatedly alter an analysis until a preferred pattern appears.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "analytic flexibility permits continued search until a preferred pattern appears", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P082-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A preregistered design can strictly constrain analytic flexibility.", "slug": "experimental_design"}], "residual_id": "r:multiple_testing_discipline:b042_a05_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b042_a05_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Different analysts or stakeholders can keep slicing, filtering, modeling, or reframing until a preferred pattern appears. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Different analysts or stakeholders can keep slicing, filtering, modeling, or reframing until a preferred pattern appears."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A preregistered design can strictly constrain analytic flexibility.", "slug": "experimental_design"}], "normalized_requirement": "Analysts can keep slicing, filtering, modeling, or reframing until a preferred pattern appears.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Analysts can keep slicing, filtering, modeling, or reframing until a preferred pattern appears.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A finding will trigger expensive action, reputation change, policy change, clinical choice, enforcement, or strategic commitment.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially important when selected findings will guide decisions, reputations, resource allocation, safety action, publication, enforcement, or product launch. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: A finding will trigger expensive action, reputation change, policy change, clinical choice, enforcement, or strategic commitment. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A finding will trigger expensive action, reputation change, policy change, clinical choice, enforcement, or strategic commitment.", "It is especially important when selected findings will guide decisions, reputations, resource allocation, safety action, publication, enforcement, or product launch."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "A finding will trigger expensive action, reputation change, policy change, clinical choice, enforcement, or strategic commitment."}, {"display_text": "Exploratory search is valuable, but the organization needs a clear boundary between generating leads and confirming claims.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It becomes necessary when exploratory results are about to be presented as confirmed claims or used for consequential action. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: Exploratory search is valuable, but the organization needs a clear boundary between generating leads and confirming claims. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Exploratory search is valuable, but the organization needs a clear boundary between generating leads and confirming claims.", "It becomes necessary when exploratory results are about to be presented as confirmed claims or used for consequential action."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "Exploratory search is valuable, but the organization needs a clear boundary between generating leads and confirming claims."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 42, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-042", "ledger_sha256": "7cff4e683ef421ac426f7b0e49659b61b89057de80c5337ace7ed446446bb42e"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Multi-Scale Resilience Architecture", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:multiscale_resilience_architecture", "slug": "multiscale_resilience_architecture"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 5 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is cross-scale fragility hidden behind single-scale resilience. A system may protect local units without preserving whole-system continuity. Or it may preserve aggregate metrics by exhausting local units, suppliers, communities, ecosystems, or teams.\n\nThis often appears when resilience is equated with more capacity at one level: more local reserves, a bigger central stockpile, another backup system, or a stronger central command. Those may help, but they do not automatically answer where shocks originate, where they cross boundaries, who should absorb them first, when support should escalate, and how recovery returns the system to a viable operating state.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system is resilient at one scale but fragile at another, or a resilience intervention at one level shifts risk, cost, delay, overload, or dependency to another level."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Resilience can address one scale and does not entail multiscale shocks.", "slug": "resilience"}], "residual_id": "r:multiscale_resilience_architecture:b042_a06_c1", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b042_a06_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Shocks occur at several scales. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Shocks occur at several scales."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Resilience can address one scale and does not entail multiscale shocks.", "slug": "resilience"}], "normalized_requirement": "Material shocks occur at several spatial, organizational, temporal, or systemic scales.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Material shocks occur at several spatial, organizational, temporal, or systemic scales.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P082-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the local-unit and whole-system-continuity roles.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A system contains local units with coping capacity and has system-wide continuity that can require restoration.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail positive local coping capacity rather than total local incapacity.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The local units possess some coping capacity.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the cross-scale local-to-system restoration relation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Restoration of continuity is evaluated at the whole-system scale rather than only within a local unit.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail insufficiency of local units acting alone, not impossibility after cross-level support.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The local units cannot restore system-wide continuity on their own.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Local units have coping capacity but cannot restore system-wide continuity alone.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "local coping capacity is insufficient for whole-system restoration", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P082-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A resilient local unit may fully restore a small system, or lack coping capacity altogether.", "slug": "resilience"}], "residual_id": "r:multiscale_resilience_architecture:b042_a06_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b042_a06_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Local units have coping capacity but cannot restore system-wide continuity alone. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Local units have coping capacity but cannot restore system-wide continuity alone."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A resilient local unit may fully restore a small system, or lack coping capacity altogether.", "slug": "resilience"}], "normalized_requirement": "Local units can cope temporarily but cannot restore whole-system continuity alone.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Local units can cope temporarily but cannot restore whole-system continuity alone.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P082-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the existing central-plan role and the local level to which it applies.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An existing centrally scoped continuity plan applies to local units or operations.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail omission or neglect of the local input rather than its explicit incorporation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The plan fails to incorporate a relevant local condition.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when the central plan ignores local context.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The omitted condition is local context.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when the central plan ignores local slack or reserve capacity.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The omitted condition is local slack.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A central continuity plan exists but ignores local context or local slack.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "central continuity plan omits a required local condition", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P082-C13-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A resilience plan can incorporate local context and slack.", "slug": "resilience"}], "residual_id": "r:multiscale_resilience_architecture:b042_a06_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b042_a06_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Central continuity plans exist but ignore local context or local slack. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Central continuity plans exist but ignore local context or local slack."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_GUARDED_EQUIVALENT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A manufacturing schedule can instantiate the plan-execute gap without being a continuity plan, but that instance fails the emitted plan-domain guard.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Plan-Execute Gap", "one_liner": "The pathology in which a coarse-grained planning artefact cannot be enacted because the execution layer faces binding fine-grained constraints the planning model never represented — so the fix is constraint propagation and feedback, never a better forecast.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:plan_execute_gap", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "focal_plan_is_central_continuity_plan", "predicate": "The focal prescriptive planning artifact is an existing centrally scoped continuity plan.", "rationale": "The retained expression preserves principal roles and direction, satisfies one complete DNF branch, and uses no laundering qualifier."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "plan_execute_gap"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "focal_plan_is_central_continuity_plan"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "plan_execute_gap", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P082-C13-U1", "why_it_fits": "Both guards make the exact prescriptive-plan role a centrally scoped continuity plan and fill only O1; the omitted fine-grained local constraints directly satisfy the local-context branch. Their wording is semantically equivalent, so A's complete exact record is carried forward."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A police use-of-force rule can have the same grain mismatch without belonging to a continuity plan, but that instance fails the domain guard.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Rules-of-Engagement Ambiguity", "one_liner": "Diagnose frontline breakdown under time pressure as a grain mismatch — decision rules written coarser than the environment generates choice points — paid out of a finite discretion budget, relocating the fix from the operator's judgment to the rule, escalation path, and pre-positioned authority.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:rules_of_engagement_ambiguity", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "focal_rules_belong_to_central_continuity_plan", "predicate": "The focal action-directing rules belong to an existing centrally scoped continuity plan.", "rationale": "The retained expression preserves principal roles and direction, satisfies one complete DNF branch, and uses no laundering qualifier."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "rules_of_engagement_ambiguity"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "focal_rules_belong_to_central_continuity_plan"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "rules_of_engagement_ambiguity", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P082-C13-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact rule-grain mismatch directly supplies action-directing rules that omit fine-grained local choice-point context for frontline units. A's single domain restriction makes those existing rules part of a central continuity plan and completes the O3 branch without adding a relation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Central continuity plans omit local context or local slack.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P082-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a multilevel system and a resilience provision with a level location.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A system has multiple levels across which resilience provisions could be distributed.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail level-specific concentration rather than even or cross-level distribution.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The resilience provision is concentrated at one system level.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve exclusive one-level concentration and absence of the same provision at other levels.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The concentration is limited to only one level.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by redundancy concentrated at one level.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The concentrated provision is redundancy.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by reserves concentrated at one level.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The concentrated provision is reserves.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by recovery plans concentrated at one level.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The concentrated provision is recovery plans.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A resilience provision is concentrated at only one system level.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "resilience capacity is concentrated at one level of a multilevel system", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P082-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A reserve does not entail concentration at one level or absence elsewhere.", "slug": "reserve"}], "residual_id": "r:multiscale_resilience_architecture:b042_a06_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b042_a06_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Redundancy, reserves, or recovery plans are concentrated at only one level. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Redundancy, reserves, or recovery plans are concentrated at only one level."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A reserve does not entail concentration at one level or absence elsewhere.", "slug": "reserve"}], "normalized_requirement": "Redundancy, reserves, or recovery plans are concentrated at only one system level.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Redundancy, reserves, or recovery plans are concentrated at only one system level.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Resilience can absorb stress without transferring it to another layer.", "slug": "resilience"}], "residual_id": "r:multiscale_resilience_architecture:b042_a06_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b042_a06_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Interventions reduce visible disruption in one layer while worsening stress elsewhere. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Interventions reduce visible disruption in one layer while worsening stress elsewhere."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Resilience can absorb stress without transferring it to another layer.", "slug": "resilience"}], "normalized_requirement": "An intervention reduces disruption in one layer while transferring stress to another.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "An intervention reduces disruption in one layer while transferring stress to another.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 42, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-042", "ledger_sha256": "7cff4e683ef421ac426f7b0e49659b61b89057de80c5337ace7ed446446bb42e"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Mutual Dependency Stabilization", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:mutual_dependency_stabilization", "slug": "mutual_dependency_stabilization"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 2, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A mutually dependent relation can be useful in normal conditions but brittle under stress. One side may appear healthy while silently relying on the other side’s hidden slack, informal favors, unmeasured standby capacity, or willingness to absorb shocks. When disruption arrives, the relation fails as a whole because the dependency was never mapped, funded, monitored, or given a fallback path.\n\nThe structural tension is that coupling creates value and vulnerability at the same time. The parties cannot simply pretend to be independent, but they also cannot let shared fate become unmanaged fragility.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A necessary reciprocal dependency is operationally, socially, ecologically, or strategically fragile: one side’s shock, nonperformance, withdrawal, overload, or opportunism can quickly damage the other side, yet the relation cannot simply be severed without losing important capability or value."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Dependency can be one-way and does not entail reciprocal reliance.", "slug": "dependency"}], "residual_id": "r:mutual_dependency_stabilization:b042_a07_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b042_a07_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "One side may appear healthy while silently relying on the other side’s hidden slack, informal favors, unmeasured standby capacity, or willingness to absorb shocks. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Each side materially relies on the other for continuity, capacity, legitimacy, access, information, protection, or maintenance.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Each side materially relies on the other for continuity, capacity, legitimacy, access, information, protection, or maintenance.", "One side may appear healthy while silently relying on the other side’s hidden slack, informal favors, unmeasured standby capacity, or willingness to absorb shocks."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Dependency can be one-way and does not entail reciprocal reliance.", "slug": "dependency"}], "normalized_requirement": "Each side materially relies on the other for continuity, capacity, legitimacy, access, information, protection, or maintenance.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Each side materially relies on the other for continuity, capacity, legitimacy, access, information, protection, or maintenance.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P082-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a dependency with connected endpoints across which effects can propagate.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Two or more parties or components are connected by a dependency relation.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the relation's value-to-preserve rather than treating severance as costless.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The dependency has sufficient value that preserving it is warranted.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail fragility at ordinary disturbance levels, not only under extraordinary shocks.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The dependency is fragile under ordinary disruption.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail the dependency as a transmission path for disruption rather than an unrelated coincident failure.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Disruption at one part of the dependency can propagate harm across the relation.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve possible propagation without strengthening it to universal cascade.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Cascade across the relation is possible rather than asserted as inevitable.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "A dependency is valuable enough to preserve but fragile enough that ordinary disruption can cascade across the relation.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "valuable fragile dependency can transmit ordinary disruption", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P082-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Task interdependence need not be fragile, valuable to preserve, or cascade ordinary disruption.", "slug": "task_interdependence"}], "residual_id": "r:mutual_dependency_stabilization:b042_a07_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b042_a07_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The dependency is valuable enough to preserve but fragile enough that ordinary disruption can cascade across the relation. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The dependency is valuable enough to preserve but fragile enough that ordinary disruption can cascade across the relation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A costly de facto contract can be intentionally broken when preserving it is not warranted; the atomic value guard excludes that counterexample and closes the only gap.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Hyrum's Law", "one_liner": "With enough users of an interface, every observable behaviour will come to be depended upon by someone regardless of the formal contract, so the cost of changing an observable is set by its dependent count, not its documented status.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:hyrums_law", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "interface_dependency_valuable_to_preserve", "predicate": "The de facto interface dependency is valuable enough to preserve.", "rationale": "The retained expression preserves principal roles and direction, satisfies one complete DNF branch, and uses no laundering qualifier."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "hyrums_law"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "interface_dependency_valuable_to_preserve"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "hyrums_law", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P082-C15-U1", "why_it_fits": "Hyrum's exact de facto-contract structure supplies a fragile dependency through which ordinary observable changes can break dependent code. B's one value-to-preserve property binds only O2 to the existing dependency, so the guarded edge is valid."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A valuable dependency is fragile enough that ordinary disruption can cascade across the relation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P083-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve distinct transferring and receiving parties connected by an obligation structure.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Two parties are connected by obligations and one can impose a burden on the other.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail implicit obligations rather than obligations that are explicit and symmetric.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The obligations are implicit.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve transfer capability without strengthening it to a transfer that necessarily occurs.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "One party is able to shift the burden to the other.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail the obligation defect as a cause of transfer capability rather than incidental context.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The implicit obligation structure enables the burden transfer.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when risk is transferred to the other party.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The shifted burden is risk.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when costs are transferred to the other party.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The shifted burden is cost.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when delay is transferred to the other party.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The shifted burden is delay.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when recovery burden is transferred to the other party.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The shifted burden is recovery burden.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "One party can shift a burden onto another because their obligations are implicit.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "implicit obligations enable one-party burden transfer", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P083-C01-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P083-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve distinct transferring and receiving parties connected by an obligation structure.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Two parties are connected by obligations and one can impose a burden on the other.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail asymmetric obligations rather than obligations that are explicit and symmetric.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The obligations are asymmetric.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve transfer capability without strengthening it to a transfer that necessarily occurs.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "One party is able to shift the burden to the other.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail the obligation defect as a cause of transfer capability rather than incidental context.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The asymmetric obligation structure enables the burden transfer.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when risk is transferred to the other party.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The shifted burden is risk.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when costs are transferred to the other party.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The shifted burden is cost.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when delay is transferred to the other party.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The shifted burden is delay.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when recovery burden is transferred to the other party.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The shifted burden is recovery burden.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "One party can shift a burden onto another because their obligations are asymmetric.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "asymmetric obligations enable one-party burden transfer", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P083-C01-U2"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Risk transfer can be explicit, priced, and symmetric rather than exploiting implicit obligations.", "slug": "risk_transfer"}], "residual_id": "r:mutual_dependency_stabilization:b042_a07_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b042_a07_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: One party can shift risk, costs, delay, or recovery burden onto the other because obligations are implicit or asymmetric. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["One party can shift risk, costs, delay, or recovery burden onto the other because obligations are implicit or asymmetric."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PARTIALLY_DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A symmetric strict-validation protocol would not shift the acceptance burden, but the exact record explicitly excludes symmetry and defines Postel's Law by the opposite-facing production and acceptance duties.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Postel's Law (Robustness Principle)", "one_liner": "Postel's protocol-design maxim — be conservative in what you send, liberal in what you accept — which keeps a multi-vendor system interoperable by having every implementation produce tightly to spec while its acceptance window absorbs the realistic scatter of others.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:postels_law", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "postels_law"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "postels_law", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P083-C01-U2", "why_it_fits": "Postel's exact send-strict/accept-liberal duties are asymmetric, and liberal receivers absorb off-spec producer scatter plus its downstream compatibility and security price. That structure directly permits the producer side to impose risk or cost on the receiver, completing a DNF branch; A's exact DIRECT judgment controls."}], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 2, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 1, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Risk transfer can be explicit, priced, and symmetric rather than exploiting implicit obligations.", "slug": "risk_transfer"}], "normalized_requirement": "Implicit or asymmetric obligations let one party transfer risk, delay, cost, or recovery burden to the other.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "PARTIAL_EXISTING_DSA_GROUNDING", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation grounded 1 of 2 eligible atomic units; the remaining unit or units stayed open."}, "predicate": "Implicit or asymmetric obligations let one party transfer risk, delay, cost, or recovery burden to the other.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P083-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve multiple dependent parties and continuity of their relation.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Multiple parties remain connected by a dependency whose continuity matters.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail a need for credible continuity expectations rather than a merely optional preference.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The parties require credible expectations that the dependent relation will continue.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve residual uncertainty rather than complete certainty.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The parties cannot fully eliminate uncertainty about the relation.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve continuing dependence rather than a relation that can be made unnecessary.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The parties cannot fully eliminate their dependence.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "The parties need credible continuity expectations while uncertainty and dependence cannot be fully eliminated.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "interdependent parties require credible continuity expectations under irreducible uncertainty", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P083-C02-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A credible commitment can govern a one-way promise unrelated to mutual dependency.", "slug": "credible_commitment"}], "residual_id": "r:mutual_dependency_stabilization:b042_a07_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b042_a07_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The parties need credible continuity expectations but cannot fully eliminate uncertainty or dependence. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The parties need credible continuity expectations but cannot fully eliminate uncertainty or dependence."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A commonly known infinite horizon would remove termination uncertainty, so it defeats an unguarded edge; the guard selects the exact record's indefinite-horizon branch, where continuation is credible but not certain.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Folk Theorem (Repeated Games)", "one_liner": "Show that in a sufficiently long, patiently discounted repeated game, almost any mutually acceptable outcome can be held as an equilibrium by credible intertemporal punishment — so repetition both explains cooperation and destroys predictive determinacy.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:folk_theorem", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O3"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "indefinite_horizon_uncertain_termination", "predicate": "The repeated relation has an indefinite horizon whose termination remains uncertain.", "rationale": "The retained expression preserves exact principal roles and direction, closes one complete DNF branch, and passes the one-qualifier laundering check."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "folk_theorem"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "indefinite_horizon_uncertain_termination"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "folk_theorem", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P083-C02-U1", "why_it_fits": "Repeated-game players are strategically interdependent and cooperation depends on credible future continuation. A's guard selects the exact indefinite-horizon branch, adding only uncertain termination and thereby supplying irreducible uncertainty without inventing a role or relation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The parties need credible continuity expectations while dependence and uncertainty remain unavoidable.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P083-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve an existing fallback and its informal status.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A fallback arrangement exists in informal form.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail absence of testing rather than a tested fallback with poor performance.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The fallback has not been tested.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "An informal fallback exists but is untested.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "informal fallback has not been tested", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P083-C03-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P083-C03", "dnf": [], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [], "predicate": "An informal fallback exists but is under-resourced.", "resolution": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RESIDUAL", "semantic_scope": "NON_ABSTRACTION", "structural_head": "informal fallback has insufficient resources", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P083-C03-U2"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P083-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve an existing informal fallback and people who may hold knowledge of it.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A fallback arrangement exists in informal form and can be known by potential participants.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail knowledge of the fallback, not merely access to unrelated operational knowledge.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Knowledge of the fallback is held by people in the organization or relation.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve concentrated knowledge among a small subset rather than broad shared awareness.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Only a few people know the fallback.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}], "predicate": "An informal fallback exists but is known only to a few people.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "knowledge of an informal fallback is concentrated among few people", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P083-C03-U3"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A reserve can be formal, tested, and fully resourced.", "slug": "reserve"}], "residual_id": "r:mutual_dependency_stabilization:b042_a07_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b042_a07_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Fallbacks exist informally but are untested, under-resourced, or known only to a few people. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Fallbacks exist informally but are untested, under-resourced, or known only to a few people."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 2, "non_abstraction_units": 1, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 2}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A reserve can be formal, tested, and fully resourced.", "slug": "reserve"}], "normalized_requirement": "Fallbacks are informal, untested, under-resourced, or concentrated in tacit knowledge.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 2 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Fallbacks are informal, untested, under-resourced, or concentrated in tacit knowledge.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 42, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-042", "ledger_sha256": "7cff4e683ef421ac426f7b0e49659b61b89057de80c5337ace7ed446446bb42e"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Narrative Construction Audit", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:narrative_construction_audit", "slug": "narrative_construction_audit"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is hidden construction. Events do not automatically arrive as a story. Someone selects a beginning, middle, and end; chooses protagonists and background actors; implies causal links; highlights some data; omits other material; and attaches a lesson or theme. Once the story is coherent, these choices can disappear from view.\n\nThat disappearance matters because stories travel better than raw records. They are easier to remember and easier to reuse. A simplified story can therefore become the basis for future decisions even when its omissions or causal shortcuts would not survive inspection.\n\nA postmortem might become “one person made a bad deploy.” A strategy review might become “the market was not ready.” A public account might become “this event proves the trend.” A historical account might become “this reform changed everything.” Each may contain truth, but each may also hide selection, omitted context, causal uncertainty, or actor focalization.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A coherent story feels self-evident because it hides the choices that made it coherent: which events were selected, which were omitted, how causes were linked, which actors were centered, and what theme or moral was imposed."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P083-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the constructed-story role.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A focal story is a constructed narrative rather than an unmediated event record.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail a change toward accepted authority or obviousness, not mere story existence.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The story is acquiring elevated epistemic or social status.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve becoming rather than a timeless classification.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The status acquisition is ongoing or emergent.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when the constructed story is acquiring authority.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The story is becoming authoritative.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when the constructed story is coming to seem self-evidently true.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The story is becoming self-evident.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A constructed story is becoming authoritative or self-evident.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "constructed story becomes authoritative or self-evident", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P083-C04-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Historical narrative construction need not become authoritative or self-evident.", "slug": "narrative_construction_in_history"}], "residual_id": "r:narrative_construction_audit:b042_a08_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b042_a08_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Story becoming authoritative. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["story_becoming_authoritative"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Historical narrative construction need not become authoritative or self-evident.", "slug": "narrative_construction_in_history"}], "normalized_requirement": "A constructed story is becoming authoritative or self-evident.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A constructed story is becoming authoritative or self-evident.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A chosen position systematically exposes some evidence while hiding other relevant evidence outside its field.", "role_mapping": "Narrative vantage -> observation position; omitted perspectives -> structurally invisible evidence.", "slug": "vantage_induced_omission", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b042_a08_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Omitted perspectives or counterevidence. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["omitted_perspectives_or_counterevidence"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Vantage-Induced Omission", "one_liner": "An apparatus's structural vantage makes some regions of a landscape reachable and others constitutively invisible, so its output is mistaken for the landscape rather than the landscape-restricted-to-its-vantage.", "page_ref": "prime:vantage_induced_omission", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Narrative vantage -> observation position; omitted perspectives -> structurally invisible evidence.", "slug": "vantage_induced_omission", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A chosen position systematically exposes some evidence while hiding other relevant evidence outside its field."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The account omits perspectives or counterevidence because its organizing vantage makes them unseen or irrelevant.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P083-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a causal narrative and the evidence against which it is evaluated.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A causal story interprets an evidential record.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail excess narrative smoothness relative to the evidential baseline.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The story presents causal progression as smoother than the evidence supports.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail excess determinacy or certainty relative to the evidential baseline.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The story presents causal determination as stronger than the evidence supports.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must satisfy both evidence-relative excesses rather than only one of them.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Both excess smoothness and excess determinacy characterize the story.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}], "predicate": "A causal story is smoother and more determinate than the evidence warrants.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "causal story exceeds evidence-warranted smoothness and determinacy", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P083-C05-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A narrative can explicitly preserve uncertainty and competing causal accounts.", "slug": "narrative_construction_in_history"}], "residual_id": "r:narrative_construction_audit:b042_a08_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b042_a08_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Causal story too smooth. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["causal_story_too_smooth"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A narrative can explicitly preserve uncertainty and competing causal accounts.", "slug": "narrative_construction_in_history"}], "normalized_requirement": "The causal story is smoother and more determinate than the evidence warrants.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The causal story is smoother and more determinate than the evidence warrants.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Observed action is over-attributed to actor disposition and under-attributed to situational constraint.", "role_mapping": "Centered actor -> observed person; distorted attribution -> dispositional overreach; omitted structure -> situation.", "slug": "fundamental_attribution_error", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b042_a08_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Actor centering distorts attribution. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["actor_centering_distorts_attribution"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Fundamental Attribution Error", "one_liner": "Misattribute causes.", "page_ref": "prime:fundamental_attribution_error", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Centered actor -> observed person; distorted attribution -> dispositional overreach; omitted structure -> situation.", "slug": "fundamental_attribution_error", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Observed action is over-attributed to actor disposition and under-attributed to situational constraint."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Centering a salient actor causes dispositional attribution while suppressing situational or structural causes.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Memory or decision use.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source states: Memory or decision use. The normalized contextual consideration is: Memory or decision use. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["memory_or_decision_use"]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "memory_or_decision_use"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 42, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-042", "ledger_sha256": "7cff4e683ef421ac426f7b0e49659b61b89057de80c5337ace7ed446446bb42e"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Narrative Transportation Persuasion Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:narrative_transportation_persuasion_design", "slug": "narrative_transportation_persuasion_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A group must communicate a belief, attitude, risk, norm, value, or intended action, but direct assertion or argument is too abstract, too contested, too emotionally inert, or too easy to counterargue. The audience does not yet feel the practical consequence of the claim, so the message remains a proposition rather than an experienced possibility.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A group must communicate a belief, attitude, risk, norm, value, or intended action, but direct assertion or argument is too abstract, too contested, too emotionally inert, or too easy to counterargue. The audience does not yet feel the practical consequence of the claim, so the message remains a proposition rather than an experienced possibility."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Transportation into a storyworld makes consequences experientially available and can shift beliefs or attitudes beyond bare argument.", "role_mapping": "Audience -> reader; lived consequence -> simulated storyworld experience; facts alone -> bare proposition.", "slug": "narrative_persuasion", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b042_a09_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The audience needs to grasp lived consequences that are hard to feel from facts, rules, or statistics alone. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The audience needs to grasp lived consequences that are hard to feel from facts, rules, or statistics alone."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Narrative Persuasion", "one_liner": "Shift attitude or belief through story-mediated transportation that bypasses counter-argument by delivering the payload as experience rather than claim.", "page_ref": "prime:narrative_persuasion", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Audience -> reader; lived consequence -> simulated storyworld experience; facts alone -> bare proposition.", "slug": "narrative_persuasion", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Transportation into a storyworld makes consequences experientially available and can shift beliefs or attitudes beyond bare argument."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "An audience needs to experience lived consequences that facts, rules, or statistics leave emotionally inert.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P083-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O4", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O5", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O6", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve direct advocacy and the receiving audience roles.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An advocate directs an explicit persuasive message at an audience.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail advocacy as a cause of the response, not merely contemporaneous messaging.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The direct advocacy produces an adverse audience response.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when direct advocacy produces reactance.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The produced response is reactance.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when direct advocacy produces motivated reasoning.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The produced response is motivated reasoning.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when direct advocacy triggers counterargument before the intended consideration is complete.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The produced response is premature counterargument.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when direct advocacy produces audience indifference.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The produced response is indifference.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve an occurring or observed response-production state, not merely a generic tendency of direct advocacy.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The adverse audience response is currently being produced or observed.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "Direct advocacy is producing reactance, motivated reasoning, premature counterargument, or indifference.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "direct advocacy produces resistance or disengagement", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P083-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Narrative persuasion can supplement effective direct advocacy and does not require prior reactance.", "slug": "narrative_persuasion"}], "residual_id": "r:narrative_transportation_persuasion_design:b042_a09_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b042_a09_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Direct advocacy is producing reactance, motivated reasoning, premature counterargument, or indifference. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Direct advocacy is producing reactance, motivated reasoning, premature counterargument, or indifference."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Narrative persuasion can supplement effective direct advocacy and does not require prior reactance.", "slug": "narrative_persuasion"}], "normalized_requirement": "Direct advocacy produces reactance, counterargument, motivated reasoning, or indifference.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Direct advocacy produces reactance, counterargument, motivated reasoning, or indifference.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact mechanism changes belief, attitude, identification, empathy, or norm perception through transportation.", "role_mapping": "Desired shift -> attitude or belief; empathy or salience -> identification and transported affect.", "slug": "narrative_persuasion", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b042_a09_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The desired shift involves empathy, salience, identity, norm perception, risk appraisal, or imagined futures. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The desired shift involves empathy, salience, identity, norm perception, risk appraisal, or imagined futures."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Narrative Persuasion", "one_liner": "Shift attitude or belief through story-mediated transportation that bypasses counter-argument by delivering the payload as experience rather than claim.", "page_ref": "prime:narrative_persuasion", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Desired shift -> attitude or belief; empathy or salience -> identification and transported affect.", "slug": "narrative_persuasion", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact mechanism changes belief, attitude, identification, empathy, or norm perception through transportation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The intended change concerns empathy, salience, identity, norms, risk appraisal, or imagined futures.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A storyworld organizes events, agents, causality, and consequences into a sequence the audience mentally simulates.", "role_mapping": "Cause-effect sequence -> plot; agents -> characters; stakes -> consequences.", "slug": "narrative_persuasion", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b042_a09_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The message requires a sequence of cause and effect that is easier to understand through agents and stakes. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The message requires a sequence of cause and effect that is easier to understand through agents and stakes."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Narrative Persuasion", "one_liner": "Shift attitude or belief through story-mediated transportation that bypasses counter-argument by delivering the payload as experience rather than claim.", "page_ref": "prime:narrative_persuasion", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Cause-effect sequence -> plot; agents -> characters; stakes -> consequences.", "slug": "narrative_persuasion", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A storyworld organizes events, agents, causality, and consequences into a sequence the audience mentally simulates."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The message depends on a causal sequence made legible through agents, choices, and stakes.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A training, change, health, civic, or safety goal depends on people imagining themselves inside the situation.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Direct claims invite evaluation from the outside, while narratives invite temporary inhabitation from the inside; persuasion improves when the audience enters the storyworld, but legitimacy depends on later restoring critical distance and choice. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: A training, change, health, civic, or safety goal depends on people imagining themselves inside the situation. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A training, change, health, civic, or safety goal depends on people imagining themselves inside the situation.", "Direct claims invite evaluation from the outside, while narratives invite temporary inhabitation from the inside; persuasion improves when the audience enters the storyworld, but legitimacy depends on later restoring critical distance and choice."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "A training, change, health, civic, or safety goal depends on people imagining themselves inside the situation."}, {"display_text": "The communicator can ethically disclose intent, avoid fabrication, and preserve audience interpretive agency.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: The communicator can ethically disclose intent, avoid fabrication, and preserve audience interpretive agency. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The communicator can ethically disclose intent, avoid fabrication, and preserve audience interpretive agency."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The communicator can ethically disclose intent, avoid fabrication, and preserve audience interpretive agency."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 42, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-042", "ledger_sha256": "7cff4e683ef421ac426f7b0e49659b61b89057de80c5337ace7ed446446bb42e"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Nearest-Exemplar Response Reuse", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:nearest_exemplar_response_reuse", "slug": "nearest_exemplar_response_reuse"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system, practitioner, learner, or model faces a new situation for which abstract rules are incomplete, too expensive to apply, or less informative than concrete experience. Past cases exist, but without an explicit exemplar-retrieval pattern, the current response may either ignore useful history or copy a memorable case because it feels familiar. The structural challenge is to use stored cases as operational models without confusing similarity with identity, anecdote with evidence, or response reuse with proof of correctness.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system, practitioner, learner, or model faces a new situation for which abstract rules are incomplete, too expensive to apply, or less informative than concrete experience. Past cases exist, but without an explicit exemplar-retrieval pattern, the current response may either ignore useful history or copy a memorable case because it feels familiar. The structural challenge is to use stored cases as operational models without confusing similarity with identity, anecdote with evidence, or response reuse with proof of correctness."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A current query cues retrieval of a concrete stored example for comparison or response.", "role_mapping": "New case -> query; answer or route -> exemplar-guided response.", "slug": "exemplar_retrieval", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b042_a10_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A new query, case, problem, incident, request, patient, ticket, dispute, or design situation must be answered or routed. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A new query, case, problem, incident, request, patient, ticket, dispute, or design situation must be answered or routed."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Exemplar Retrieval", "one_liner": "Answering by reaching for the closest stored case and reusing its response, rather than applying an abstracted rule — the history itself is the model.", "page_ref": "prime:exemplar_retrieval", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "New case -> query; answer or route -> exemplar-guided response.", "slug": "exemplar_retrieval", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A current query cues retrieval of a concrete stored example for comparison or response."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A new query or case must be answered, routed, diagnosed, or acted upon.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact pattern requires stored concrete exemplars indexed for retrieval by a new case.", "role_mapping": "Prior cases -> exemplars; store -> memory or case base; comparison -> retrieval match.", "slug": "exemplar_retrieval", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b042_a10_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A store of prior cases exists with enough feature, context, response, and outcome information to support comparison. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A store of prior cases exists with enough feature, context, response, and outcome information to support comparison."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Exemplar Retrieval", "one_liner": "Answering by reaching for the closest stored case and reusing its response, rather than applying an abstracted rule — the history itself is the model.", "page_ref": "prime:exemplar_retrieval", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Prior cases -> exemplars; store -> memory or case base; comparison -> retrieval match.", "slug": "exemplar_retrieval", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact pattern requires stored concrete exemplars indexed for retrieval by a new case."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A store of prior cases contains features, context, responses, and outcomes usable for comparison.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P083-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the judgment and configuration-level case-detail roles.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A focal judgment evaluates a case represented by a configuration of details.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail configuration-sensitive judgment rather than reliance on one isolated feature.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The judgment depends on the configuration of details.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve resistance to compact rule compression rather than an available simple and sufficient rule.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The decision-relevant configuration is not readily reducible to a compact rule.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "A relevant judgment depends on a configuration of details that is hard to reduce to a compact rule.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "judgment depends on a detail configuration resistant to rule compression", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P083-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Exemplars can be used alongside a simple and complete rule.", "slug": "exemplar_retrieval"}], "residual_id": "r:nearest_exemplar_response_reuse:b042_a10_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b042_a10_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The relevant judgment depends on configurations of details that are hard to reduce to a compact rule. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The relevant judgment depends on configurations of details that are hard to reduce to a compact rule."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A checklist-localizable judgment would defeat O3, but the exact record expressly excludes full analysis and localization while defining the judgment as a property of the assembly.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Aesthetic Coherence", "one_liner": "The holistic judgement that a composed artifact's parts belong together under a shared organising constraint, recognised faster than analysed — detectable from any patch yet localisable to none — with variety resolving into unity rather than accumulating as juxtaposition.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:aesthetic_coherence", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "aesthetic_coherence"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "aesthetic_coherence", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P083-C07-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact aesthetic-coherence judgment is a property of the assembled detail configuration and is expressly recognizable before full analysis or checklist localization. It directly entails configuration dependence and resistance to compact-rule reduction; B's one-line veto is incompatible with the line it cites."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Relevant judgment depends on a detail configuration that resists compression into a compact rule.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The cost or delay of full analysis is high enough that a case-based starting response has practical value.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The archetype must preserve the practical speed and contextual fidelity of exemplar use while making the similarity and transfer limits explicit enough to prevent anecdotal lock-in. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The cost or delay of full analysis is high enough that a case-based starting response has practical value. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The cost or delay of full analysis is high enough that a case-based starting response has practical value.", "The archetype must preserve the practical speed and contextual fidelity of exemplar use while making the similarity and transfer limits explicit enough to prevent anecdotal lock-in."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The cost or delay of full analysis is high enough that a case-based starting response has practical value."}, {"display_text": "Similarity can be made explicit enough to support audit, confidence, and exception handling.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The archetype must preserve the practical speed and contextual fidelity of exemplar use while making the similarity and transfer limits explicit enough to prevent anecdotal lock-in. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: Similarity can be made explicit enough to support audit, confidence, and exception handling. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Similarity can be made explicit enough to support audit, confidence, and exception handling.", "The archetype must preserve the practical speed and contextual fidelity of exemplar use while making the similarity and transfer limits explicit enough to prevent anecdotal lock-in."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Similarity can be made explicit enough to support audit, confidence, and exception handling."}, {"display_text": "The consequences of a wrong match are significant enough to require guardrails against superficial resemblance and biased memory.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The consequences of a wrong match are significant enough to require guardrails against superficial resemblance and biased memory. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The consequences of a wrong match are significant enough to require guardrails against superficial resemblance and biased memory."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The consequences of a wrong match are significant enough to require guardrails against superficial resemblance and biased memory."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 42, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-042", "ledger_sha256": "7cff4e683ef421ac426f7b0e49659b61b89057de80c5337ace7ed446446bb42e"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Necessary-Condition Closure Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:necessary_condition_closure_design", "slug": "necessary_condition_closure_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 8 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 8}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system treats readiness, viability, quality, or success as if strong performance on some dimensions can compensate for a missing required condition, even though the outcome actually depends on every non-substitutable prerequisite being satisfied together.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system treats readiness, viability, quality, or success as if strong performance on some dimensions can compensate for a missing required condition, even though the outcome actually depends on every non-substitutable prerequisite being satisfied together."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Success requires every necessary factor while failure can arise from any missing factor.", "role_mapping": "Outcome -> successful system; prerequisites -> necessary factors; absent one -> failure mode.", "slug": "anna_karenina_principle", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b042_a11_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The target outcome fails if any one of several required inputs, permissions, capabilities, timings, states, data flows, safeguards, or contextual conditions is absent. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The target outcome fails if any one of several required inputs, permissions, capabilities, timings, states, data flows, safeguards, or contextual conditions is absent."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Anna Karenina Principle", "one_liner": "Success requires every one of a set of necessary conditions to hold at once while failure follows from the absence of any single one, so successes look alike, failures look idiosyncratic, and the system is gated by its weakest unsatisfied condition.", "page_ref": "prime:anna_karenina_principle", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Outcome -> successful system; prerequisites -> necessary factors; absent one -> failure mode.", "slug": "anna_karenina_principle", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Success requires every necessary factor while failure can arise from any missing factor."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The outcome fails whenever any one of several non-substitutable prerequisites is absent.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Successful systems are alike in satisfying all requirements; unsuccessful cases fail in diverse missing-factor ways.", "role_mapping": "Successful cases -> all requirements present; idiosyncratic failures -> differing absent factors.", "slug": "anna_karenina_principle", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b042_a11_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Different failures appear idiosyncratic, but successful cases share a common full set of prerequisites. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Different failures appear idiosyncratic, but successful cases share a common full set of prerequisites."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Anna Karenina Principle", "one_liner": "Success requires every one of a set of necessary conditions to hold at once while failure follows from the absence of any single one, so successes look alike, failures look idiosyncratic, and the system is gated by its weakest unsatisfied condition.", "page_ref": "prime:anna_karenina_principle", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Successful cases -> all requirements present; idiosyncratic failures -> differing absent factors.", "slug": "anna_karenina_principle", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Successful systems are alike in satisfying all requirements; unsuccessful cases fail in diverse missing-factor ways."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Successful cases share a complete prerequisite set while failures differ by which required condition is missing.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P083-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve stakeholder users, a summary measure, and a noncompensable blocking condition.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Stakeholders use an aggregate evaluative measure while a hard blocker may be present.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail possible obscuration of the blocker by aggregation rather than merely low metric accuracy.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The aggregate measure can conceal the hard blocker from the stakeholders' readiness assessment.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve can-hide modality without requiring concealment in every use.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Concealment of the blocker is possible rather than inevitable.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by an aggregate readiness score.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The aggregate measure is a readiness score.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by a maturity rating.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The aggregate measure is a maturity rating.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by an averaged risk measure.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The aggregate measure is a risk average.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Stakeholders use an aggregate metric that can hide a hard blocker.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "aggregate readiness indicator can conceal a noncompensable blocker", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P083-C08-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P083-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve stakeholder assessors and a noncompensable blocking condition.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Stakeholders assess readiness while a hard blocker may be present.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail possible obscuration by informal optimism rather than aggregation by a formal measure.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The stakeholders' informal optimism can conceal the hard blocker.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve can-hide modality without requiring concealment in every optimistic assessment.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Concealment of the blocker is possible rather than inevitable.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "Stakeholders rely on informal optimism that can hide a hard blocker.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "informal optimism can conceal a noncompensable blocker", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P083-C08-U2"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The principle does not require an aggregate score or an actor averaging the blocker away.", "slug": "anna_karenina_principle"}], "residual_id": "r:necessary_condition_closure_design:b042_a11_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b042_a11_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Stakeholders use aggregate readiness scores, maturity ratings, risk averages, or informal optimism that can hide a hard blocker. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders use aggregate readiness scores, maturity ratings, risk averages, or informal optimism that can hide a hard blocker."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 2, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 2}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The principle does not require an aggregate score or an actor averaging the blocker away.", "slug": "anna_karenina_principle"}], "normalized_requirement": "Aggregate readiness scores or optimism can average away a hard blocker.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 2 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Aggregate readiness scores or optimism can average away a hard blocker.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P083-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve prerequisite items and multiple accountable ownership loci.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A set of prerequisites is distributed among multiple accountable owners or loci.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail fragmented ownership rather than one owner accountable for the full prerequisite set.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Different owners or loci hold responsibility for different prerequisites.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve possible accountability loss rather than asserting it always occurs.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A prerequisite can fall between the resulting accountability boundaries.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail fragmented ownership as the reason a prerequisite can be stranded.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The cross-owner distribution creates the possibility of the accountability gap.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Prerequisites are owned across different accountability domains and therefore can fall between boundaries.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "fragmented prerequisite ownership can create cross-boundary accountability gaps", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P083-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A constraint can have one clear owner and need not cross organizational boundaries.", "slug": "constraint"}], "residual_id": "r:necessary_condition_closure_design:b042_a11_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b042_a11_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Prerequisites are owned by different teams, layers, sites, vendors, roles, or domains and therefore can fall between accountability boundaries. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Prerequisites are owned by different teams, layers, sites, vendors, roles, or domains and therefore can fall between accountability boundaries."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A constraint can have one clear owner and need not cross organizational boundaries.", "slug": "constraint"}], "normalized_requirement": "Prerequisites cross ownership boundaries and can fall between accountable actors.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Prerequisites cross ownership boundaries and can fall between accountable actors.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Output is limited by the essential input in shortest supply, regardless of abundance elsewhere.", "role_mapping": "Scarcest resource -> limiting nutrient; total output -> yield; other capabilities -> nonlimiting inputs.", "slug": "liebigs_law_of_the_minimum", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b042_a11_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A child limiting-factor pattern is present: total output is capped by the scarcest required resource or weakest required capability. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A child limiting-factor pattern is present: total output is capped by the scarcest required resource or weakest required capability."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Liebig's Law of the Minimum", "one_liner": "A system's output is governed by whichever of its non-substitutable required inputs is in shortest relative supply, not by the total or average.", "page_ref": "prime:liebigs_law_of_the_minimum", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Scarcest resource -> limiting nutrient; total output -> yield; other capabilities -> nonlimiting inputs.", "slug": "liebigs_law_of_the_minimum", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Output is limited by the essential input in shortest supply, regardless of abundance elsewhere."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Total output is capped by the scarcest required resource or weakest required capability.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P083-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the condition-set and success-test representation roles.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A focal outcome has a set of conditions and a possible predicate for testing success.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve partial knowledge rather than a wholly unknown or fully specified set.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Only part of the condition set is known.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail absence of the predicate representation, not merely an inconvenient syntax.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The known condition set has not yet been expressed as a success predicate.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve lack of operational testability rather than an existing executable or evaluable condition.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "No testable success predicate currently represents the set.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "A condition set is partly known but is not expressed as a testable success predicate.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "partly known prerequisite set lacks a testable success expression", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P083-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The full necessary-factor set can already be explicit and testable.", "slug": "anna_karenina_principle"}], "residual_id": "r:necessary_condition_closure_design:b042_a11_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b042_a11_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The condition set is partly known but not yet expressed as a testable success predicate. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The condition set is partly known but not yet expressed as a testable success predicate."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The full necessary-factor set can already be explicit and testable.", "slug": "anna_karenina_principle"}], "normalized_requirement": "The prerequisite set is partly known but not stated as a testable success predicate.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The prerequisite set is partly known but not stated as a testable success predicate.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Success requires the conjunction of all non-substitutable factors, so a transition fails if any is absent.", "role_mapping": "Go/no-go success -> viable system; simultaneous prerequisites -> all necessary factors.", "slug": "anna_karenina_principle", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b042_a11_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A go/no-go, launch, admission, transition, implementation, recovery, or scaling decision depends on simultaneous satisfaction of many conditions. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A go/no-go, launch, admission, transition, implementation, recovery, or scaling decision depends on simultaneous satisfaction of many conditions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Anna Karenina Principle", "one_liner": "Success requires every one of a set of necessary conditions to hold at once while failure follows from the absence of any single one, so successes look alike, failures look idiosyncratic, and the system is gated by its weakest unsatisfied condition.", "page_ref": "prime:anna_karenina_principle", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Go/no-go success -> viable system; simultaneous prerequisites -> all necessary factors.", "slug": "anna_karenina_principle", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Success requires the conjunction of all non-substitutable factors, so a transition fails if any is absent."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A go/no-go or transition decision depends on simultaneous satisfaction of many prerequisites.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P083-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a prior attempt and a condition necessary for its success.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A prior system attempt had an outcome dependent on a necessary condition.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail actual prior failure and the contrast with apparent preparation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The prior attempt failed despite appearing strongly prepared.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the singular condition whose status defeats the otherwise strong preparation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "One necessary condition bears the defect responsible for failure.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail the condition defect as a cause of failure rather than a later diagnosis unrelated to the outcome.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The necessary-condition defect caused the prior failure.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when the condition was treated as satisfied by assumption.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The necessary condition was assumed rather than established.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when the condition was left out of preparation or verification.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The necessary condition was omitted.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when the condition's prior status was outdated.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The necessary condition was stale.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when satisfaction of the condition could not be verified.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The necessary condition was unverifiable.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A prior apparently well-prepared attempt failed because one necessary condition was assumed, omitted, stale, or unverifiable.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "one defective necessary condition causes failure despite apparent preparation", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P083-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The principle can be applied prospectively before any prior failure occurs.", "slug": "anna_karenina_principle"}], "residual_id": "r:necessary_condition_closure_design:b042_a11_c8", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b042_a11_c8", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The system has previously failed after apparently strong preparation because one necessary condition was assumed, omitted, stale, or unverifiable. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The system has previously failed after apparently strong preparation because one necessary condition was assumed, omitted, stale, or unverifiable."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_GUARDED_EQUIVALENT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A plainly experimental or visibly incomplete dereference attempt need not appear prepared, so it defeats DIRECT; the guard binds only that presentation fact while leaving the null mechanism unchanged.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Null dereference", "one_liner": "The failure where code operates on a reference under the unstated assumption that the object exists, while the reference is in fact absent — so the defect is the missing existence-precondition check, not the absence itself.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:null_dereference", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "failing_operation_appeared_strongly_prepared", "predicate": "The failing operation appeared strongly prepared before its attempted execution.", "rationale": "The retained expression preserves exact principal roles and direction, closes one complete DNF branch, and passes the one-qualifier laundering check."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "null_dereference"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "failing_operation_appeared_strongly_prepared"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "null_dereference", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P083-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "Both readers map the failed execution, unstated existence precondition, and absent-object path to the assumed-condition failure branch, and both add only the otherwise contingent apparent-preparation fact. Their guards are semantically equivalent; A's fuller exact record is carried forward."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A visibly speculative scale commitment can still instantiate scale-before-fit and defeats DIRECT; the guard binds only the candidate operation's apparent-preparation property.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Scale-Before-Fit", "one_liner": "Diagnose a venture's failure as one of ordering — committing substantial growth investment before demonstrating repeatable, unsubsidised demand — by asking whether the evidence at the moment of commitment justified the cost base it locked in.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:scale_before_fit", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "failed_scale_commitment_appeared_strongly_prepared", "predicate": "The failed scale commitment appeared strongly prepared before execution.", "rationale": "The retained expression preserves exact principal roles and direction, closes one complete DNF branch, and passes the one-qualifier laundering check."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "scale_before_fit"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "failed_scale_commitment_appeared_strongly_prepared"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "scale_before_fit", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P083-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "Scale-before-fit supplies a failed commitment caused by omission of the repeatability-evidence gate before execution. A correctly treats apparent preparation as the sole contingent property of the existing commitment role; the one guard closes O2 without converting a possible flawless rollout into actuality."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A prior apparently well-prepared attempt failed because one necessary condition was omitted, stale, assumed, or unverifiable.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [8], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 42, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-042", "ledger_sha256": "7cff4e683ef421ac426f7b0e49659b61b89057de80c5337ace7ed446446bb42e"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Necessity-Possibility-Contingency Framing", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:necessity_possibility_contingency_framing", "slug": "necessity_possibility_contingency_framing"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 2, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 1, "statement": "2 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A claim, option, requirement, forecast, or design move is being handled without specifying whether it is necessary, possible, impossible, or contingent under a defined assumption set. The resulting decision either over-commits to one world, dismisses viable alternatives, confuses duties with permissions, or treats hypothetical cases as interchangeable with actual likelihoods.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A claim, option, requirement, forecast, or design move is being handled without specifying whether it is necessary, possible, impossible, or contingent under a defined assumption set. The resulting decision either over-commits to one world, dismisses viable alternatives, confuses duties with permissions, or treats hypothetical cases as interchangeable with actual likelihoods."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P083-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O9"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O10"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve multiple participants and the focal use of modal vocabulary.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Multiple participants use a modal term in a shared discussion.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail dispute about modal force rather than agreement on a clearly scoped term.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The participants argue over the meaning or application of the modal term.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve absence of a common scope or assumption set.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The participants do not agree on the term's scope.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when participants dispute 'can' without common scope.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The disputed modal expression is 'can'.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when participants dispute 'must' without common scope.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The disputed modal expression is 'must'.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when participants dispute 'may' without common scope.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The disputed modal expression is 'may'.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when participants dispute 'should' without common scope.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The disputed modal expression is 'should'.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when participants dispute 'would' without common scope.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The disputed modal expression is 'would'.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when participants dispute 'cannot' without common scope.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "The disputed modal expression is 'cannot'.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when participants dispute 'possible' without common scope.", "obligation_id": "O10", "statement": "The disputed modal expression is 'possible'.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Participants argue over a modal expression without agreeing on its scope.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "modal-vocabulary dispute lacks common scope", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P083-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Problem framing can be agreed and need not involve modal disagreement.", "slug": "problem_framing"}], "residual_id": "r:necessity_possibility_contingency_framing:b042_a12_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b042_a12_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Participants argue over can, must, may, should, would, cannot, or possible without agreeing on their scope. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Participants argue over can, must, may, should, would, cannot, or possible without agreeing on their scope."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Problem framing can be agreed and need not involve modal disagreement.", "slug": "problem_framing"}], "normalized_requirement": "Participants dispute modal terms such as can, must, may, should, would, or cannot without common scope.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Participants dispute modal terms such as can, must, may, should, would, or cannot without common scope.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A critical juncture is a consequential branch point and does not entail modal-source classification.", "slug": "critical_juncture"}], "residual_id": "r:necessity_possibility_contingency_framing:b042_a12_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b042_a12_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A decision depends on whether a condition is logically necessary, physically constrained, legally required, institutionally contingent, or merely customary. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A decision depends on whether a condition is logically necessary, physically constrained, legally required, institutionally contingent, or merely customary."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A critical juncture is a consequential branch point and does not entail modal-source classification.", "slug": "critical_juncture"}], "normalized_requirement": "A decision depends on distinguishing logical necessity, physical constraint, legal duty, institutional contingency, and custom.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A decision depends on distinguishing logical necessity, physical constraint, legal duty, institutional contingency, and custom.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P083-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve multiple compared cases and their background-fact assumptions.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Two or more hypothetical or alternative cases are compared against background facts.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the relation between case comparison and treatment of background assumptions.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Background facts are controlled or varied as part of the case comparison.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail inconsistent background treatment rather than a controlled comparison.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The background facts are not held fixed or varied consistently across the compared cases.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Compared hypothetical or alternative cases do not hold or vary background facts consistently.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "scenario comparison changes background assumptions inconsistently", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P083-C13-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The principle requires consistent preservation of background facts, the opposite of this failure.", "slug": "minimal_modification_principle"}], "residual_id": "r:necessity_possibility_contingency_framing:b042_a12_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b042_a12_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Scenarios, counterfactuals, exceptions, or design alternatives are being compared but background facts are not held or varied consistently. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Scenarios, counterfactuals, exceptions, or design alternatives are being compared but background facts are not held or varied consistently."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A false equivalence between ordinary non-scenario objects need not involve background assumptions and defeats DIRECT; the guard restricts the existing controlling dimension to that one scenario-comparison role.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "False Equivalence", "one_liner": "The fallacy of treating two things as comparably weighted on the dimension a judgment turns on, when they in fact differ by an order of magnitude or by kind — by highlighting a genuine shared feature and suppressing the difference that actually controls.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:false_equivalence", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1", "O2"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "controlling_dimension_is_scenario_background_assumption", "predicate": "The controlling dimension is a background assumption of the compared alternative scenarios.", "rationale": "The retained expression preserves exact principal roles and direction, closes one complete DNF branch, and passes the one-qualifier laundering check."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "false_equivalence"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "controlling_dimension_is_scenario_background_assumption"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "false_equivalence", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P083-C13-U1", "why_it_fits": "False equivalence already supplies compared items and a suppressed controlling difference. A's single relation-typing guard makes that existing controlling dimension a background assumption of the compared alternative scenarios; the resulting suppressed difference directly constitutes inconsistent background treatment."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Compared scenarios vary background facts inconsistently.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P083-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve an evaluand and the robustness status applied to it.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A rule, model, claim, or plan is an evaluand for robustness.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve boundary cases tied to the evaluand rather than unrelated edge examples.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Boundary cases relevant to the evaluand can be specified or tested.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail necessity of boundary-case consideration rather than optional usefulness.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Boundary cases are required for warranted robustness treatment.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the boundary-assessment-before-robustness order.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Boundary cases are needed before the evaluand is treated as robust.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "An evaluand needs boundary cases before it is treated as robust.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "robustness treatment requires prior boundary-case consideration", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P083-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A falsifiable claim can have clear refutation conditions without a complete boundary-case inventory.", "slug": "falsifiability"}], "residual_id": "r:necessity_possibility_contingency_framing:b042_a12_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b042_a12_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A rule, model, claim, or plan needs boundary cases before it is treated as robust. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A rule, model, claim, or plan needs boundary cases before it is treated as robust."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "An unperturbed Nash equilibrium can fail the boundary-case test, but the exact record expressly excludes it from the perfected subset; it is the contrast that establishes the requirement rather than refuting it.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Trembling-Hand Perfect Equilibrium", "one_liner": "Filter the Nash equilibria by giving every action a vanishing positive probability of being played by mistake and keeping only those that survive as the tremble shrinks to zero, discarding equilibria propped up by threats that never have to be carried out.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:trembling_hand_perfect_equilibrium", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "trembling_hand_perfect_equilibrium"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "trembling_hand_perfect_equilibrium", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P083-C14-U1", "why_it_fits": "Trembling-hand perfection takes a candidate equilibrium, specifies fully mixed vanishing-error boundary perturbations, and withholds the robust refinement unless the profile survives their limit. This directly instantiates prior boundary-case consideration as a robustness requirement; A's exact DIRECT judgment controls."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A rule, model, claim, or plan lacks boundary cases needed before robustness can be asserted.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P083-C15", "dnf": [], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [], "predicate": "A team must distinguish unknown, impossible, infeasible, unlikely, forbidden, optional, and required states.", "resolution": "SOURCE_DEFECT", "semantic_scope": "SOURCE_DEFECT", "structural_head": "team is required to distinguish modal, feasibility, epistemic, and deontic states", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P083-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Uncertainty distinguishes unknown likelihood but does not entail conflation with legal or physical impossibility.", "slug": "uncertainty"}], "residual_id": "r:necessity_possibility_contingency_framing:b042_a12_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b042_a12_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A team must distinguish unknown, impossible, infeasible, unlikely, forbidden, optional, and required states. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A team must distinguish unknown, impossible, infeasible, unlikely, forbidden, optional, and required states."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "SOURCE_REVIEW_REQUIRED", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 1, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Uncertainty distinguishes unknown likelihood but does not entail conflation with legal or physical impossibility.", "slug": "uncertainty"}], "normalized_requirement": "Unknown, impossible, infeasible, unlikely, forbidden, optional, and required states are conflated.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "SOURCE_REVIEW_REQUIRED", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later candidate-blind atomization found that the source wording lacks a relation required by its diagnostic reading, so this is a source-repair issue rather than evidence of a missing abstraction."}, "predicate": "Unknown, impossible, infeasible, unlikely, forbidden, optional, and required states are conflated.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The cost of confusing possible with likely or contingent with necessary is high.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A claim, option, requirement, forecast, or design move is being handled without specifying whether it is necessary, possible, impossible, or contingent under a defined assumption set. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The cost of confusing possible with likely or contingent with necessary is high. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The cost of confusing possible with likely or contingent with necessary is high.", "A claim, option, requirement, forecast, or design move is being handled without specifying whether it is necessary, possible, impossible, or contingent under a defined assumption set."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The cost of confusing possible with likely or contingent with necessary is high."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 42, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-042", "ledger_sha256": "7cff4e683ef421ac426f7b0e49659b61b89057de80c5337ace7ed446446bb42e"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Negative-Mere-Exposure Reversal for Disliked Targets", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:negative_mere_exposure_reversal_for_disliked_targets", "slug": "negative_mere_exposure_reversal_for_disliked_targets"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 1 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 1}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A person, group, user population, audience, organization, or community maintains a negative attitude toward a target because exposure is avoided, rare, hostilely framed, too intense, or repeatedly paired with bad experiences, leaving no opportunity for benign familiarity to accumulate.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A person, group, user population, audience, organization, or community maintains a negative attitude toward a target because exposure is avoided, rare, hostilely framed, too intense, or repeatedly paired with bad experiences, leaving no opportunity for benign familiarity to accumulate."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P084-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an attitude-holder, target, and actual negative orientation such as dislike, distrust, avoidance, stigma, fear, or alienation.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A person or collective holds a negative attitude toward a target.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must make the selected unfamiliarity, uncertainty, social-labeling, or isolated-exposure condition a causal contributor, not merely a correlate.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The selected listed condition partly causes the negative attitude.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the contrast with verified present danger rather than treating an established hazard as the causal basis.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The operative basis is not a verified current hazard posed by the target.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires insufficient familiarity as the causal contributor.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Unfamiliarity with the target partly causes the negative attitude.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires uncertainty as the causal contributor.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Uncertainty about the target partly causes the negative attitude.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires socially supplied labeling or framing as the causal contributor.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "Social labeling of the target partly causes the negative attitude.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires isolated adverse encounters rather than verified current hazard as the causal contributor.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "One or more isolated bad exposures partly cause the negative attitude.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A listed non-hazard condition partly causes a negative attitude toward a target rather than a verified current hazard.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "listed non-hazard condition partly causes a negative target orientation", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P084-C01-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Learning an exposure distribution does not entail a negative prior attitude or hostile framing.", "slug": "exposure_distribution_learning"}], "residual_id": "r:negative_mere_exposure_reversal_for_disliked_targets:b042_a13_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b042_a13_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The target is disliked, distrusted, avoided, stigmatized, feared, or treated as alien, but the dislike is at least partly driven by unfamiliarity, uncertainty, social labeling, or isolated bad exposures rather than by a verified current hazard. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The target is disliked, distrusted, avoided, stigmatized, feared, or treated as alien, but the dislike is at least partly driven by unfamiliarity, uncertainty, social labeling, or isolated bad exposures rather than by a verified current hazard."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A genuine causal link from the associate to the target was tested, but the exact record expressly excludes it from guilt by association.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Guilt by Association", "one_liner": "Discredit a claim by the disreputable company it keeps — treating shared supporters, origins, or venues as a verdict on content — a relevance failure that lets no truth-value flow along co-occurrence edges without an independent causal or evidential link.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:guilt_by_association", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "guilt_by_association"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "guilt_by_association", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P084-C01-U1", "why_it_fits": "SSD authoritative adjudication: The exact definition makes an unsupported association carry a negative judgment to the target; the relevance gap rules out an independently verified causal or evidential hazard, satisfying the social-labeling branch."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A target is disliked or avoided partly because it is unfamiliar, threat-framed, or known through isolated bad encounters rather than verified present hazard.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Stakeholders can create repeated encounters that are safe, bounded, and ethically permissible.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: Stakeholders can create repeated encounters that are safe, bounded, and ethically permissible. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders can create repeated encounters that are safe, bounded, and ethically permissible."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "Stakeholders can create repeated encounters that are safe, bounded, and ethically permissible."}, {"display_text": "The goal is to increase tolerance, openness, preference, or willingness to engage rather than to prove the target objectively good.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: The goal is to increase tolerance, openness, preference, or willingness to engage rather than to prove the target objectively good. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The goal is to increase tolerance, openness, preference, or willingness to engage rather than to prove the target objectively good."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "The goal is to increase tolerance, openness, preference, or willingness to engage rather than to prove the target objectively good."}, {"display_text": "Initial exposures can be made low-intensity enough that participants remain within a tolerable zone.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this deployment constraint: Initial exposures can be made low-intensity enough that participants remain within a tolerable zone. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Initial exposures can be made low-intensity enough that participants remain within a tolerable zone."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Initial exposures can be made low-intensity enough that participants remain within a tolerable zone."}, {"display_text": "There is a way to monitor whether attitudes are improving, worsening, or merely becoming numb.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: There is a way to monitor whether attitudes are improving, worsening, or merely becoming numb. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["There is a way to monitor whether attitudes are improving, worsening, or merely becoming numb."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "There is a way to monitor whether attitudes are improving, worsening, or merely becoming numb."}, {"display_text": "The target can be encountered in varied contexts so familiarity generalizes beyond one artificial setting.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The same repetition that can build familiarity and liking can also intensify dislike when the target is genuinely harmful, when exposure is coercive, when the exposure dose is wrong, or when every repetition reactivates threat instead of safety. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: The target can be encountered in varied contexts so familiarity generalizes beyond one artificial setting. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The target can be encountered in varied contexts so familiarity generalizes beyond one artificial setting.", "The same repetition that can build familiarity and liking can also intensify dislike when the target is genuinely harmful, when exposure is coercive, when the exposure dose is wrong, or when every repetition reactivates threat instead of safety."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The target can be encountered in varied contexts so familiarity generalizes beyond one artificial setting."}, {"display_text": "The designers can stop, modify, or escalate review if exposure produces distress, resentment, learned helplessness, or stronger aversion.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: The designers can stop, modify, or escalate review if exposure produces distress, resentment, learned helplessness, or stronger aversion. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The designers can stop, modify, or escalate review if exposure produces distress, resentment, learned helplessness, or stronger aversion."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "The designers can stop, modify, or escalate review if exposure produces distress, resentment, learned helplessness, or stronger aversion."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 42, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-042", "ledger_sha256": "7cff4e683ef421ac426f7b0e49659b61b89057de80c5337ace7ed446446bb42e"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Negative Priming Avoidance", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:negative_priming_avoidance", "slug": "negative_priming_avoidance"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The system must address a harmful or competing concept, but naming and repeating that concept can prime it. Under cognitive load, the audience may process the salient object more than the negation. The result is a contaminated intervention: the forbidden phrase, unsafe action, rumor, stereotype, panic frame, or trigger becomes the most memorable object.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "An intervention meant to suppress, warn against, correct, or prevent a harmful concept instead increases its mental availability. The warning centers the prohibited object, the correction repeats the false claim, the safety sign illustrates the dangerous action, the therapeutic script intensifies an intrusive cue, or the culture message rehearses the behavior it condemns. Because attention and priming are limited and context-sensitive, the undesired target becomes easier to retrieve than the intended alternative."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P084-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a suppressive message and the action it seeks to prevent.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A message is intended to warn against or prohibit an action.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail attentional or representational centering of the prohibited action, not merely mention an unrelated risk.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The message centers the forbidden action in its content.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a do-not, avoid, never, or equivalent negated-action formulation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The message centers the action by a negative imperative that names it.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires illustrative presentation of the forbidden action.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The message centers the action through a vivid example of it.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A suppressive warning or prohibition centers the forbidden action by naming it in negation or presenting a vivid example of it.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "a suppressive message centers the forbidden action through negation or vivid exemplification", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P084-C02-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Reactance concerns threatened autonomy and does not require repetition or priming of a forbidden concept.", "slug": "reactance"}], "residual_id": "r:negative_priming_avoidance:b042_a14_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b042_a14_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The message relies on “do not X,” “avoid X,” “never X,” or vivid examples of the forbidden action. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The message relies on “do not X,” “avoid X,” “never X,” or vivid examples of the forbidden action."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Reactance concerns threatened autonomy and does not require repetition or priming of a forbidden concept.", "slug": "reactance"}], "normalized_requirement": "A warning or prohibition centers the forbidden action through negation or vivid examples.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A warning or prohibition centers the forbidden action through negation or vivid examples.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P084-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a corrective intervention and the harmful representational or behavioral target it addresses.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An intervention addresses a harmful phrase, image, behavior, stereotype, or false claim.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail repetition or rehearsal of the focal target within the intervention.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The intervention repeats that same harmful target.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must bind the repetition to corrective intent rather than to unrelated republication.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The repetition occurs as part of the attempt to refute or suppress the target.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "A corrective intervention repeats a harmful target while trying to refute or suppress that same target.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "a correction repeats the harmful target it seeks to refute", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P084-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Repeated exposure can occur without a corrective or suppressive message.", "slug": "mere_exposure_effect"}], "residual_id": "r:negative_priming_avoidance:b042_a14_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b042_a14_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The intervention repeats the harmful phrase, image, behavior, stereotype, or false claim while trying to refute it. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The intervention repeats the harmful phrase, image, behavior, stereotype, or false claim while trying to refute it."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A correction may summarize rather than quote every word, yet the exact record requires it to specify what was said and preserve the erroneous original while correcting it; removing same-target repetition destroys the defining auditable claim trajectory.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Corrections Policy", "one_liner": "An institution's standing rule to acknowledge errors in its public claims through visible, dated, attributed corrections that preserve the original — converting an unverifiable edit history into a reconstructible, auditable claim-trajectory.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:corrections_policy", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "corrections_policy"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "corrections_policy", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P084-C03-U1", "why_it_fits": "SSD authoritative adjudication: A policy that silently overwrites the error would avoid repetition, but the exact record expressly excludes silent revision and requires the original and correction to remain accessible together."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A correction repeats the harmful phrase, image, behavior, stereotype, or false claim it seeks to suppress.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A desire path concerns behavior made easy by use patterns, not comparative mental salience in a warning.", "slug": "desire_path"}], "residual_id": "r:negative_priming_avoidance:b042_a14_c5", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b042_a14_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The safe alternative is vague, abstract, delayed, or less visually prominent than the avoided target. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The safe alternative is vague, abstract, delayed, or less visually prominent than the avoided target."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A desire path concerns behavior made easy by use patterns, not comparative mental salience in a warning.", "slug": "desire_path"}], "normalized_requirement": "The safe alternative is less concrete, immediate, or visually prominent than the prohibited target.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The safe alternative is less concrete, immediate, or visually prominent than the prohibited target.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Prior activation raises accessibility so a related cue facilitates retrieval or response without deliberate reasoning.", "role_mapping": "Target concept -> representation; prior exposure -> prime; reactivation -> facilitated accessibility.", "slug": "priming", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b042_a14_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Prior exposure or strong associations make the target concept easy to reactivate. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Prior exposure or strong associations make the target concept easy to reactivate."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Priming", "one_liner": "Prior exposure to a stimulus transiently activates related representations in memory, biasing or speeding subsequent processing, often without awareness.", "page_ref": "prime:priming", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Target concept -> representation; prior exposure -> prime; reactivation -> facilitated accessibility.", "slug": "priming", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Prior activation raises accessibility so a related cue facilitates retrieval or response without deliberate reasoning."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Prior exposure or strong associations make the unwanted concept readily reactivated by a cue.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Repeated exposure to a stimulus increases familiarity and often shifts affect even without new propositional evidence.", "role_mapping": "Repeated cue -> exposure; target concept -> stimulus; familiarity -> exposure effect.", "slug": "mere_exposure_effect", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b042_a14_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The same cue sequence will be repeated frequently enough to create familiarity or normalization. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The same cue sequence will be repeated frequently enough to create familiarity or normalization."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Mere Exposure Effect", "one_liner": "Repeated exposure to a stimulus raises liking for it along a saturating curve, even without conscious recognition of the prior encounters.", "page_ref": "prime:mere_exposure_effect", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Repeated cue -> exposure; target concept -> stimulus; familiarity -> exposure effect.", "slug": "mere_exposure_effect", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Repeated exposure to a stimulus increases familiarity and often shifts affect even without new propositional evidence."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The cue sequence repeats often enough to create familiarity with the unwanted target.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The audience is under stress, time pressure, cognitive load, or uncertainty and may process the salient object more than the logical negation.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Under cognitive load, the audience may process the salient object more than the negation. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The audience is under stress, time pressure, cognitive load, or uncertainty and may process the salient object more than the logical negation. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The audience is under stress, time pressure, cognitive load, or uncertainty and may process the salient object more than the logical negation.", "Under cognitive load, the audience may process the salient object more than the negation."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "The audience is under stress, time pressure, cognitive load, or uncertainty and may process the salient object more than the logical negation."}, {"display_text": "The unwanted concept is taboo, traumatic, tempting, stigmatized, rumor-like, dangerous, or socially contagious.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The unwanted concept is taboo, traumatic, tempting, stigmatized, rumor-like, dangerous, or socially contagious. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The unwanted concept is taboo, traumatic, tempting, stigmatized, rumor-like, dangerous, or socially contagious."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "The unwanted concept is taboo, traumatic, tempting, stigmatized, rumor-like, dangerous, or socially contagious."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 42, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-042", "ledger_sha256": "7cff4e683ef421ac426f7b0e49659b61b89057de80c5337ace7ed446446bb42e"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Negative Space as Structural Element", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:negative_space_as_structural_element", "slug": "negative_space_as_structural_element"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is that visible elements compete without enough field structure. Viewers may see all elements as equally important, miss the main figure, lose group boundaries, or experience the field as crowded even when the amount of content is modest. Empty space exists, but it is not assigned a role.\n\nThe root tension is that the design needs less visible matter and more perceptual structure. Yet removing too much can erase context, affordance, warmth, evidence, or meaning.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A visual or spatial field is overloaded, evenly dense, or poorly separated, so viewers cannot tell what matters, where to rest, how parts relate, or what form is being implied. Empty space exists only accidentally, as leftover margin or unused surface, instead of being tuned as a structural element."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Unmarked field is deliberately composed to separate, balance, emphasize, and organize the positive elements.", "role_mapping": "Unmarked field -> negative space; guide attention -> compositional structure; extra marks -> positive elements.", "slug": "negative_space", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b042_a15_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The design must guide attention or hierarchy with few elements rather than many labels, borders, arrows, or decorative marks. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The design must guide attention or hierarchy with few elements rather than many labels, borders, arrows, or decorative marks."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Negative Space", "one_liner": "Empty space shaping form.", "page_ref": "prime:negative_space", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Unmarked field -> negative space; guide attention -> compositional structure; extra marks -> positive elements.", "slug": "negative_space", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Unmarked field is deliberately composed to separate, balance, emphasize, and organize the positive elements."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Attention and hierarchy must be guided by an unmarked field rather than additional labels, borders, arrows, or decoration.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The empty field creates separation, breathing room, contrast, and perceptual definition around form.", "role_mapping": "Breathing room -> negative space; visible content -> positive figure.", "slug": "negative_space", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b042_a15_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The visible content needs breathing room, isolation, or contrast to become legible and emotionally precise. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The visible content needs breathing room, isolation, or contrast to become legible and emotionally precise."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Negative Space", "one_liner": "Empty space shaping form.", "page_ref": "prime:negative_space", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Breathing room -> negative space; visible content -> positive figure.", "slug": "negative_space", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The empty field creates separation, breathing room, contrast, and perceptual definition around form."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Visible content requires surrounding emptiness or contrast to become legible and perceptually precise.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P084-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve one perceptual field and its constituent elements.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A visual or spatial field contains multiple included elements.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the universal local-utility claim rather than usefulness of only some elements.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Every included element has individual local utility.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail clutter despite, not because of the absence of, local usefulness.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The field nevertheless feels cluttered at the whole-field level.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "A visual or spatial field is cluttered even though every included element is individually useful.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "global visual or spatial clutter persists despite universal local utility", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P084-C04-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Negative space can be structural in a sparse, uncluttered composition.", "slug": "negative_space"}], "residual_id": "r:negative_space_as_structural_element:b042_a15_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b042_a15_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A page, interface, composition, room, diagram, or object feels cluttered even when every included element is individually useful. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A page, interface, composition, room, diagram, or object feels cluttered even when every included element is individually useful."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Negative space can be structural in a sparse, uncluttered composition.", "slug": "negative_space"}], "normalized_requirement": "A visual or spatial field feels cluttered despite each included element having local utility.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A visual or spatial field feels cluttered despite each included element having local utility.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Negative space is the ground whose deliberate relation to positive form establishes hierarchy and figure-ground distinction.", "role_mapping": "Primary figure -> positive form; support -> negative field; distinction -> figure-ground organization.", "slug": "negative_space", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "Perception organizes a scene into attended figure and supporting ground.", "role_mapping": "Primary element -> figure; background or support -> ground.", "slug": "figure_ground", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b042_a15_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The viewer must distinguish primary figure from background, foreground from support, or essential from secondary elements. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The viewer must distinguish primary figure from background, foreground from support, or essential from secondary elements."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Negative Space", "one_liner": "Empty space shaping form.", "page_ref": "prime:negative_space", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Primary figure -> positive form; support -> negative field; distinction -> figure-ground organization.", "slug": "negative_space", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Negative space is the ground whose deliberate relation to positive form establishes hierarchy and figure-ground distinction."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Figure-Ground", "one_liner": "Perceptual organization of a field into salient figure and receding ground.", "page_ref": "prime:figure_ground", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Primary element -> figure; background or support -> ground.", "slug": "figure_ground", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Perception organizes a scene into attended figure and supporting ground."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The viewer must distinguish primary figure from supporting ground or essential from secondary content.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The intended message depends on restraint, calm, elegance, reverence, severity, spaciousness, or selective emphasis.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when the intended effect is clarity, calm, elegance, gravity, reverence, or focused attention. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The intended message depends on restraint, calm, elegance, reverence, severity, spaciousness, or selective emphasis. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The intended message depends on restraint, calm, elegance, reverence, severity, spaciousness, or selective emphasis.", "It is especially useful when the intended effect is clarity, calm, elegance, gravity, reverence, or focused attention."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The intended message depends on restraint, calm, elegance, reverence, severity, spaciousness, or selective emphasis."}, {"display_text": "The design can manipulate margin, spacing, density, scale, alignment, field, cropping, or silence.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when a visual, spatial, or informational field feels cluttered, evenly dense, over-explained, or weakly focused, and when the designer can improve perception by removing, spacing, or protecting rather than adding more marks. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: The design can manipulate margin, spacing, density, scale, alignment, field, cropping, or silence. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The design can manipulate margin, spacing, density, scale, alignment, field, cropping, or silence.", "Use this archetype when a visual, spatial, or informational field feels cluttered, evenly dense, over-explained, or weakly focused, and when the designer can improve perception by removing, spacing, or protecting rather than adding more marks."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The design can manipulate margin, spacing, density, scale, alignment, field, cropping, or silence."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 42, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-042", "ledger_sha256": "7cff4e683ef421ac426f7b0e49659b61b89057de80c5337ace7ed446446bb42e"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Negative Space Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:negative_space_design", "slug": "negative_space_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 2, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is not just excess. It is unstructured presence: every available region, sentence, control, slot, or moment is filled, so the audience cannot perceive priority or relation. The important element may be visible but has no perceptual room. A pause may be needed but is filled with talk. A system may be empty but gives no clue whether emptiness means success, error, waiting, or neglect.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A surface, message, space, process, or conversation contains too many competing elements, too little rest, or no deliberate omission. As a result, the intended form, priority, relation, emotional tone, or reflective opportunity cannot be perceived cleanly."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P084-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must require more than one element in a shared field.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Multiple elements occupy the same attentional field.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail attentional competition rather than mere co-presence.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The elements compete for attention.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the no-element-has-sufficient-room condition, not a single obscured item.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "None of the competing elements has enough room to be read clearly.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}], "predicate": "Multiple elements compete for attention and none has enough perceptual room to be read clearly.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "attention competition deprives every element of sufficient room for clear reading", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P084-C05-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Negative space can structure a sparse composition with no crowding.", "slug": "negative_space"}], "residual_id": "r:negative_space_design:b043_a01_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b043_a01_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Multiple visible, verbal, spatial, or procedural elements compete for attention and none has enough room to be read clearly. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Multiple visible, verbal, spatial, or procedural elements compete for attention and none has enough room to be read clearly."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Negative space can structure a sparse composition with no crowding.", "slug": "negative_space"}], "normalized_requirement": "Many visible, verbal, spatial, or procedural elements compete without enough room for clear reading.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Many visible, verbal, spatial, or procedural elements compete without enough room for clear reading.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P084-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a focal-content role and a distinct surrounding-activity role.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A field contains focal content and surrounding activity.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail presence of the content, not explain failure by missing content.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The important focal content is present rather than absent.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must make the surrounding activity suppress perceptual or practical access to the focal content.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The surrounding activity buries or obscures the important content.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Important content is present in a field but buried by surrounding activity.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "surrounding activity buries important content that remains present", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P084-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Negative space can emphasize content that was already prominent.", "slug": "negative_space"}], "residual_id": "r:negative_space_design:b043_a01_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b043_a01_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The important object, claim, action, or relationship is present but buried in surrounding activity. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The important object, claim, action, or relationship is present but buried in surrounding activity."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AUDITED_SHARED_NEGATIVE", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A physically incapable object was tested, but the exact record excludes it: functional fixedness exists only when the raw properties remain present and permit the use while the category tag blocks their inspection.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Functional Fixedness", "one_liner": "The cognitive bias in which encoding an object under its conventional category label crowds out inspection of its raw physical properties, blocking the solver from a non-conventional use the problem needs and the object's properties would permit.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:functional_fixedness", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "functional_fixedness"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "functional_fixedness", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P084-C06-U1", "why_it_fits": "Exact shared-negative rescue: every complete functional-fixedness instance contains useful raw properties that remain present but are buried from practical access by surrounding category-retrieval activity."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Interesting or true introduced material was tested, but the exact record still classifies it as a red herring when it does no work on the open question and shifts the floor.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Red Herring", "one_liner": "Deflect a discussion by introducing material irrelevant to the open question, so attention and the conversational floor shift to the new topic and the original question is left feeling-addressed-but-unanswered — the test being whether the new material does any work on the claim that was open.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:red_herring", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "red_herring"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "red_herring", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P084-C06-U1", "why_it_fits": "SSD authoritative adjudication: Every red herring leaves the original open question present but unanswered while introduced material takes the scarce conversational floor, directly burying practical access to the focal content."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Important content is present but buried by surrounding activity.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P084-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve users, a design, and a pause needed for interpretation, response, recovery, or decision.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "People engaged with a design require a temporal or quiet pause for a cognitive or responsive function.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve exhaustive gap filling rather than one isolated interruption.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The design fills every available gap.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve immediate occupation of the pause relative to the user's need.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The design fills each gap immediately, before the needed pause can serve its function.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail interference with the required interpretive, responsive, recovery, or decision interval.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The gap filling deprives people of the needed pause.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "People require an unfilled pause for interpretation, response, recovery, or decision, but a design immediately fills every gap.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "a design immediately fills pauses required for cognitive or responsive work", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P084-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Negative space need not involve time, recovery, or decision pacing.", "slug": "negative_space"}], "residual_id": "r:negative_space_design:b043_a01_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b043_a01_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: People need time or quiet to interpret, respond, recover, or decide, but the design immediately fills every gap. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["People need time or quiet to interpret, respond, recover, or decide, but the design immediately fills every gap."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Negative space need not involve time, recovery, or decision pacing.", "slug": "negative_space"}], "normalized_requirement": "A design fills pauses needed for interpretation, response, recovery, or decision.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A design fills pauses needed for interpretation, response, recovery, or decision.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Deliberate emptiness or silence is a communicative design element that shapes emphasis and interpretive openness.", "role_mapping": "Absence -> negative space; communicated quality -> aesthetic and semantic function.", "slug": "negative_space", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b043_a01_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A design needs to communicate restraint, solemnity, calm, importance, invitation, or completion through what is absent as much as through what is present. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A design needs to communicate restraint, solemnity, calm, importance, invitation, or completion through what is absent as much as through what is present."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Negative Space", "one_liner": "Empty space shaping form.", "page_ref": "prime:negative_space", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Absence -> negative space; communicated quality -> aesthetic and semantic function.", "slug": "negative_space", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Deliberate emptiness or silence is a communicative design element that shapes emphasis and interpretive openness."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Absence or silence must communicate restraint, calm, importance, invitation, completion, or interpretive openness.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P084-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a system absence-state and users who interpret it.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A system enters an empty, idle, no-data, no-task, or no-content state encountered by users.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve missing intentional framing rather than a framed state that users ignore.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The absence-state lacks intentional semantic framing.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail a real possibility of misreading, not require that every user actually misreads it.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Users can misinterpret the unframed state.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "Users may misread a system's absence state when that state lacks intentional framing.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "an unframed absence state permits user misinterpretation", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P084-C08-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Visual negative space does not entail an operational no-data state or user misreading.", "slug": "negative_space"}], "residual_id": "r:negative_space_design:b043_a01_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b043_a01_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A system has an empty, idle, no-data, no-task, or no-content state that users may misread without intentional framing. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A system has an empty, idle, no-data, no-task, or no-content state that users may misread without intentional framing."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A correctly empty view was tested, but it remains an empty-state failure exactly when the absence lacks interpretive scaffolding.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Empty-State Failure", "one_liner": "The interface condition in which a view has no content and provides no scaffolding for the absence — no explanation of the cause, no disambiguation among the possible causes (new, filtered, permission, loading, error), and no next action — so the user, left to infer meaning from nothing, typically concludes wrongly that the system is broken or gated.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:empty_state_failure", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "empty_state_failure"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "empty_state_failure", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P084-C08-U1", "why_it_fits": "SSD authoritative adjudication: The exact record defines an accurate empty view with no explanation, disambiguation, or next action, leaving the user to infer the wrong cause; all obligations are necessary."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "An empty, idle, no-data, no-task, or no-content state can be misread without intentional framing.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The designer is tempted to add one more explanation, control, ornament, option, cue, or comment even though the current failure is crowding.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when the elements are present but crowded, when attention needs room, when silence would produce better response than more explanation, or when an empty state needs to communicate its meaning. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The designer is tempted to add one more explanation, control, ornament, option, cue, or comment even though the current failure is crowding. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The designer is tempted to add one more explanation, control, ornament, option, cue, or comment even though the current failure is crowding.", "Use this archetype when the elements are present but crowded, when attention needs room, when silence would produce better response than more explanation, or when an empty state needs to communicate its meaning."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The designer is tempted to add one more explanation, control, ornament, option, cue, or comment even though the current failure is crowding."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 43, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-043", "ledger_sha256": "24251df91d9f53e683ffbeb3d833389b3743f7ba7b4512b1bf3ed55c25bc7b42"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Neighbor-Suppression Contrast Sharpening", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:neighbor_suppression_contrast_sharpening", "slug": "neighbor_suppression_contrast_sharpening"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system must distinguish meaningful signals, boundaries, categories, priorities, or figures, but adjacent activations overlap enough that the field appears blurry. The risk is not just insufficient emphasis; it is local interference: neighboring responses, options, alerts, categories, or claims compete so strongly that edges are lost, winners are ambiguous, and interpretation becomes noisy.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system must distinguish meaningful signals, boundaries, categories, priorities, or figures, but adjacent activations overlap enough that the field appears blurry. The risk is not just insufficient emphasis; it is local interference: neighboring responses, options, alerts, categories, or claims compete so strongly that edges are lost, winners are ambiguous, and interpretation becomes noisy."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A field of active neighbors suppresses locally, amplifying differences into edges and winners.", "role_mapping": "Signals -> active elements; adjacency -> neighborhood; boundary -> sharpened contrast.", "slug": "lateral_inhibition", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b043_a02_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Many similar or adjacent signals are active at once and users or downstream processes struggle to identify the decisive boundary. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Many similar or adjacent signals are active at once and users or downstream processes struggle to identify the decisive boundary."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Lateral Inhibition", "one_liner": "Active elements suppress their neighbours, sharpening contrast.", "page_ref": "prime:lateral_inhibition", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Signals -> active elements; adjacency -> neighborhood; boundary -> sharpened contrast.", "slug": "lateral_inhibition", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A field of active neighbors suppresses locally, amplifying differences into edges and winners."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Many nearby active signals compete so that a decisive local boundary is hard to resolve.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Salience can arise from novelty or value without genuinely close competitors.", "slug": "salience"}], "residual_id": "r:neighbor_suppression_contrast_sharpening:b043_a02_c3", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b043_a02_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A focal signal needs to stand out because neighboring signals are genuinely close, not merely because designers want it to be more attention-grabbing. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A focal signal needs to stand out because neighboring signals are genuinely close, not merely because designers want it to be more attention-grabbing."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Salience can arise from novelty or value without genuinely close competitors.", "slug": "salience"}], "normalized_requirement": "A focal signal must stand out because its competitors are genuinely close rather than for decorative attention capture.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A focal signal must stand out because its competitors are genuinely close rather than for decorative attention capture.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P084-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the focal, neighbor, noise, and discrimination roles.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A discriminating system contains a focal signal, neighboring activation, and noise.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the counterfactual or prospective common-gain effect on all three roles.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Raw uniform amplification would increase the focal signal, neighboring activation, and noise together.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail no improvement in discrimination despite increased amplitude.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The common amplification leaves focal-versus-background discrimination unchanged.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Uniformly amplifying a focal signal would also amplify its neighbors and noise, leaving discrimination unchanged.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "uniform gain amplifies focal signal, neighbors, and noise together without improving discrimination", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P084-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Lateral inhibition can be present without a prior or counterfactual uniform-amplification attempt.", "slug": "lateral_inhibition"}], "residual_id": "r:neighbor_suppression_contrast_sharpening:b043_a02_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b043_a02_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Raw amplification would also amplify neighbors and noise, leaving discrimination unchanged. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Raw amplification would also amplify neighbors and noise, leaving discrimination unchanged."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Lateral inhibition can be present without a prior or counterfactual uniform-amplification attempt.", "slug": "lateral_inhibition"}], "normalized_requirement": "Uniform amplification increases neighbors and noise along with the focal signal, preserving poor discrimination.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Uniform amplification increases neighbors and noise along with the focal signal, preserving poor discrimination.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Suppression strength is explicitly a function of proximity among neighboring elements.", "role_mapping": "Neighborhood -> lateral adjacency; local competition -> reciprocal suppression.", "slug": "lateral_inhibition", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b043_a02_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The system has a meaningful notion of neighborhood: spatial, semantic, temporal, organizational, ecological, or channel-based proximity. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The system has a meaningful notion of neighborhood: spatial, semantic, temporal, organizational, ecological, or channel-based proximity."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Lateral Inhibition", "one_liner": "Active elements suppress their neighbours, sharpening contrast.", "page_ref": "prime:lateral_inhibition", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Neighborhood -> lateral adjacency; local competition -> reciprocal suppression.", "slug": "lateral_inhibition", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Suppression strength is explicitly a function of proximity among neighboring elements."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The field has a meaningful spatial, semantic, temporal, organizational, ecological, or channel neighborhood relation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The mechanism converts a graded crowded field into sharper peaks, boundaries, or winner selection.", "role_mapping": "Downstream classification -> emergent boundary; nearby alternatives -> competing elements.", "slug": "lateral_inhibition", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b043_a02_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Downstream classification, action selection, handoff, or resource allocation depends on crisp enough boundaries. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Downstream classification, action selection, handoff, or resource allocation depends on crisp enough boundaries."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Lateral Inhibition", "one_liner": "Active elements suppress their neighbours, sharpening contrast.", "page_ref": "prime:lateral_inhibition", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Downstream classification -> emergent boundary; nearby alternatives -> competing elements.", "slug": "lateral_inhibition", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The mechanism converts a graded crowded field into sharper peaks, boundaries, or winner selection."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Downstream selection depends on boundaries sharpened enough to distinguish nearby alternatives.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The cost of false blending is high: two classes, locations, risks, options, or responsibilities are mistakenly treated as one.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The cost of false blending is high: two classes, locations, risks, options, or responsibilities are mistakenly treated as one. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The cost of false blending is high: two classes, locations, risks, options, or responsibilities are mistakenly treated as one."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "The cost of false blending is high: two classes, locations, risks, options, or responsibilities are mistakenly treated as one."}, {"display_text": "Local competition can be reversed, audited, or tuned rather than permanently deleting alternatives.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: Local competition can be reversed, audited, or tuned rather than permanently deleting alternatives. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Local competition can be reversed, audited, or tuned rather than permanently deleting alternatives."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Local competition can be reversed, audited, or tuned rather than permanently deleting alternatives."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 43, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-043", "ledger_sha256": "24251df91d9f53e683ffbeb3d833389b3743f7ba7b4512b1bf3ed55c25bc7b42"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Neighborhood-Preserving Substrate Mapping", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:neighborhood_preserving_substrate_mapping", "slug": "neighborhood_preserving_substrate_mapping"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 6, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 5, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "6 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A meaningful source space must be represented on a bounded substrate, but arbitrary, purely global, or uniformly allocated placement destroys useful locality, hides coverage gaps and distortion, wastes scarce substrate, and makes local failures produce unpredictable or nonlocal consequences.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A meaningful source space must be represented on a bounded substrate, but arbitrary, purely global, or uniformly allocated placement destroys useful locality, hides coverage gaps and distortion, wastes scarce substrate, and makes local failures produce unpredictable or nonlocal consequences."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A source-space neighborhood relation is a mandatory input to the map.", "role_mapping": "Source domain -> source space; nearby elements -> neighborhood relation.", "slug": "topographic_map", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b043_a03_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The source domain has a meaningful neighborhood, continuity, similarity, adjacency, or ordering relation. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The source domain has a meaningful neighborhood, continuity, similarity, adjacency, or ordering relation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Topographic Map", "one_liner": "A source space is laid out on a substrate by a neighbourhood-preserving map with non-uniform magnification, so positions encode relationships and damage to a substrate region predicts a localised source deficit.", "page_ref": "prime:topographic_map", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source domain -> source space; nearby elements -> neighborhood relation.", "slug": "topographic_map", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A source-space neighborhood relation is a mandatory input to the map."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The source has a meaningful neighborhood, continuity, similarity, adjacency, or ordering relation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The source is laid out on a substrate with its own finite spatial extent.", "role_mapping": "Representing substrate -> target sheet; bounded capacity -> spatial extent.", "slug": "topographic_map", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b043_a03_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The representing substrate has bounded capacity and supports local interaction, placement, communication, maintenance, or failure. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The representing substrate has bounded capacity and supports local interaction, placement, communication, maintenance, or failure."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Topographic Map", "one_liner": "A source space is laid out on a substrate by a neighbourhood-preserving map with non-uniform magnification, so positions encode relationships and damage to a substrate region predicts a localised source deficit.", "page_ref": "prime:topographic_map", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Representing substrate -> target sheet; bounded capacity -> spatial extent.", "slug": "topographic_map", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The source is laid out on a substrate with its own finite spatial extent."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A finite spatial substrate carries the representation and supports local interaction or failure.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Neighborhood preservation maps close source points to close substrate positions.", "role_mapping": "Source relations -> source neighborhood; local operation -> substrate locality.", "slug": "topographic_map", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b043_a03_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Local source relations should be exploitable through local substrate operations. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Local source relations should be exploitable through local substrate operations."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Topographic Map", "one_liner": "A source space is laid out on a substrate by a neighbourhood-preserving map with non-uniform magnification, so positions encode relationships and damage to a substrate region predicts a localised source deficit.", "page_ref": "prime:topographic_map", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source relations -> source neighborhood; local operation -> substrate locality.", "slug": "topographic_map", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Neighborhood preservation maps close source points to close substrate positions."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Local source relations are preserved so local substrate operations can exploit them.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Non-uniform magnification allocates different substrate area per unit source according to functional importance.", "role_mapping": "Representational density -> magnification function; source region -> mapped region.", "slug": "topographic_map", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b043_a03_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Different source regions deserve different representational density because sensitivity, demand, risk, precision, or frequency is uneven. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Different source regions deserve different representational density because sensitivity, demand, risk, precision, or frequency is uneven."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Topographic Map", "one_liner": "A source space is laid out on a substrate by a neighbourhood-preserving map with non-uniform magnification, so positions encode relationships and damage to a substrate region predicts a localised source deficit.", "page_ref": "prime:topographic_map", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Representational density -> magnification function; source region -> mapped region.", "slug": "topographic_map", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Non-uniform magnification allocates different substrate area per unit source according to functional importance."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Source regions receive unequal representational density according to sensitivity, demand, risk, precision, or frequency.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The lesion-implies-localized-deficit signature is constitutive and scales with magnification.", "role_mapping": "Substrate disturbance -> lesion; source consequence -> localized deficit.", "slug": "topographic_map", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b043_a03_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Operators need to infer source-space consequences from the location of a substrate disturbance. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Operators need to infer source-space consequences from the location of a substrate disturbance."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Topographic Map", "one_liner": "A source space is laid out on a substrate by a neighbourhood-preserving map with non-uniform magnification, so positions encode relationships and damage to a substrate region predicts a localised source deficit.", "page_ref": "prime:topographic_map", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Substrate disturbance -> lesion; source consequence -> localized deficit.", "slug": "topographic_map", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The lesion-implies-localized-deficit signature is constitutive and scales with magnification."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The location of substrate damage predicts a localized deficit in source-space function.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P084-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve plurality rather than alignment within one space.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "At least two representational spaces participate in the alignment.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail alignment as required, not merely possible or beneficial.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The spaces must be aligned.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve geometric nonidentity rather than collapse the spaces into one geometry.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The alignment does not assume identical geometry across the spaces.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires cross-modal alignment.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The aligned spaces correspond to distinct modalities.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires cross-scale alignment.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The aligned spaces correspond to distinct scales.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Several modalities or several scales must be aligned without assuming that their geometries are identical.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "multiple nonisometric modality or scale spaces require alignment", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P084-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "One topographic map can represent one modality and does not entail cross-modal alignment.", "slug": "topographic_map"}], "residual_id": "r:neighborhood_preserving_substrate_mapping:b043_a03_c8", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b043_a03_c8", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Several modalities or scales must be aligned without pretending their geometries are identical. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Several modalities or scales must be aligned without pretending their geometries are identical."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_SYNTHESIS", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A same-scale isometric body-to-cortex copy was tested, but it contradicts the exact receptor-density magnification rule; calling the spaces distinct sensory modalities was also rejected as a role-typing error.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Somatotopy", "one_liner": "Represent the body surface on neural tissue as a continuous neighbourhood-preserving map — adjacent body regions projecting to adjacent neural loci — with magnification set by receptor density and behavioural importance rather than body size, and reshaped by an activity-dependent plasticity rule.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:somatotopy", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "somatotopy"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "somatotopy", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P084-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "SSD authoritative synthesis: the candidate satisfies O1-O2-O3-O5 through non-isometric cross-scale alignment. The readers' modality disagreement is resolved by rejecting O4 and using the independently sufficient scale branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_SYNTHESIS", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A same-scale isometric visual-field copy was tested, but it contradicts the exact cortical-magnification relation; calling visual field and visual cortex distinct sensory modalities was also rejected as a role-typing error.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Retinotopy", "one_liner": "Preserve the two-dimensional layout of the visual field as a two-dimensional layout on visual cortex — adjacent points in the world projecting to adjacent neurons — an invertible map that lets a lesion predict a scotoma and a rotating stimulus reconstruct the map.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:retinotopy", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "retinotopy"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "retinotopy", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P084-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "SSD authoritative synthesis: the candidate satisfies O1-O2-O3-O5 through non-isometric cross-scale alignment. The readers' modality disagreement is resolved by rejecting O4 and using the independently sufficient scale branch."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Several modalities or scales require alignment without assuming identical geometries.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [8], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Coverage gaps, folds, collisions, and seams would create material misclassification, blind spots, routing errors, or coordination failures.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A meaningful source space must be represented on a bounded substrate, but arbitrary, purely global, or uniformly allocated placement destroys useful locality, hides coverage gaps and distortion, wastes scarce substrate, and makes local failures produce unpredictable or nonlocal consequences. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Coverage gaps, folds, collisions, and seams would create material misclassification, blind spots, routing errors, or coordination failures. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Coverage gaps, folds, collisions, and seams would create material misclassification, blind spots, routing errors, or coordination failures.", "A meaningful source space must be represented on a bounded substrate, but arbitrary, purely global, or uniformly allocated placement destroys useful locality, hides coverage gaps and distortion, wastes scarce substrate, and makes local failures produce unpredictable or nonlocal consequences."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Coverage gaps, folds, collisions, and seams would create material misclassification, blind spots, routing errors, or coordination failures."}, {"display_text": "The map may reorganize through learning, growth, demand shifts, damage, or version change.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The map may reorganize through learning, growth, demand shifts, damage, or version change. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The map may reorganize through learning, growth, demand shifts, damage, or version change."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "The map may reorganize through learning, growth, demand shifts, damage, or version change."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 43, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-043", "ledger_sha256": "24251df91d9f53e683ffbeb3d833389b3743f7ba7b4512b1bf3ed55c25bc7b42"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": [{"groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "I tested ordinary developmental activity-dependent refinement without injury; the DSA holds but the guard does not. When visual-system damage causes the deprivation, the exact plastic remapping makes damage the reorganization driver.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Retinotopy", "one_liner": "Preserve the two-dimensional layout of the visual field as a two-dimensional layout on visual cortex — adjacent points in the world projecting to adjacent neurons — an invertible map that lets a lesion predict a scotoma and a rotating stimulus reconstruct the map.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:retinotopy", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O6"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "retinotopic_deprivation_caused_by_damage", "predicate": "The retinotopic deprivation is caused by visual-system damage.", "rationale": "The exact-record mapping satisfies one complete DNF branch, preserves typed roles and direction, and the single qualifier is anchored, atomic, and sufficient."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "retinotopy"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The retinotopic deprivation is caused by visual-system damage."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "retinotopy", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P084-C10-U1", "why_it_fits": "SSD authoritative adjudication: Retinotopy alone does not make damage the driver, because deprivation may arise without damage. The guard atomically selects visual-system damage as the cause of the exact record's native deprivation condition."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "The map can remain stable over a particular observation interval, but capability is the unit's modality; intensive practice is explicitly capable of expanding the practiced representation, satisfying the learning branch.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Somatotopy", "one_liner": "Represent the body surface on neural tissue as a continuous neighbourhood-preserving map — adjacent body regions projecting to adjacent neural loci — with magnification set by receptor density and behavioural importance rather than body size, and reshaped by an activity-dependent plasticity rule.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:somatotopy", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "somatotopy"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "somatotopy", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P084-C10-U1", "why_it_fits": "SSD authoritative adjudication: A fixed body map with no use-dependent reorganization would contradict the exact record's lifespan plasticity and practice-driven expansion, so it is not a complete instance of this candidate record."}], "publication_role": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT_ONLY", "source_residual_occurrence_id": "r:neighborhood_preserving_substrate_mapping:b043_a03_c7", "unit": {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P084-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a map or mapping whose organization can change.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A mapping organizes a source space on a substrate.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail reorganization as possible under the selected pressure.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The mapping is capable of reorganizing rather than necessarily remaining fixed.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires learning as the reorganization context.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Learning can drive the mapping's reorganization.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires growth as the reorganization context.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Growth can drive the mapping's reorganization.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires changed demand as the reorganization context.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "A demand shift can drive the mapping's reorganization.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires damage as the reorganization context.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "Damage can drive the mapping's reorganization.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires version change as the reorganization context.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "Version change can drive the mapping's reorganization.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A mapping can reorganize in response to learning, growth, demand shift, damage, or version change.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "a mapping is capable of reorganization under a listed change pressure", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P084-C10-U1"}}]}
{"archetype": {"name": "Nested and Distributed Transaction Coordination", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:nested_and_distributed_transaction_coordination", "slug": "nested_and_distributed_transaction_coordination"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 3, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A desired transaction crosses multiple systems, services, parties, ledgers, databases, approval layers, or organizational boundaries, but each participant can only commit, abort, retry, or repair its own local state, creating risk of partial completion, double execution, stranded resources, inconsistent records, or unknown final status.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A desired transaction crosses multiple systems, services, parties, ledgers, databases, approval layers, or organizational boundaries, but each participant can only commit, abort, retry, or repair its own local state, creating risk of partial completion, double execution, stranded resources, inconsistent records, or unknown final status."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Coordination does not require one transaction or state change across participants.", "slug": "coordination"}], "residual_id": "r:nested_and_distributed_transaction_coordination:b043_a04_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b043_a04_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A single user, business, operational, legal, or policy transaction requires coordinated changes in more than one autonomous state holder. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A single user, business, operational, legal, or policy transaction requires coordinated changes in more than one autonomous state holder."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Coordination does not require one transaction or state change across participants.", "slug": "coordination"}], "normalized_requirement": "One transaction requires coordinated changes in several autonomous state holders.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "One transaction requires coordinated changes in several autonomous state holders.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P084-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve multiple participant roles and coupled transaction steps.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A transaction has at least two participants with corresponding local steps.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve actual local success rather than local failure.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "One participant's local step succeeds.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the possibility that counterpart deviation makes the otherwise successful local step adverse, without requiring that every deviation actualizes harm.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A deviation in another participant's corresponding step can make the local success harmful, misleading, or costly.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires counterpart failure.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The other participant's corresponding step fails.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires counterpart delay.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The other participant's corresponding step is delayed.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires counterpart duplication.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The other participant's corresponding step is duplicated.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires counterpart rejection.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The other participant's corresponding step is rejected.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "One transaction participant's local success can become harmful, misleading, or costly when another participant's corresponding step fails, is delayed, is duplicated, or is rejected.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "counterpart-step deviation can make local transaction success adverse", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P084-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Eventual consistency permits temporary replica divergence but does not entail harmful partial business completion.", "slug": "eventual_consistency"}], "residual_id": "r:nested_and_distributed_transaction_coordination:b043_a04_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b043_a04_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Local success by one participant can become harmful, misleading, or costly if another participant fails, delays, duplicates, or rejects its corresponding step. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Local success by one participant can become harmful, misleading, or costly if another participant fails, delays, duplicates, or rejects its corresponding step."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A completed local reservation can be intentionally visible and later refunded after a service failure; the local success remains real, and the later failure makes it costly enough to require compensation, preserving the failure branch.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Saga Pattern", "one_liner": "Achieve all-or-nothing semantics across a multi-step operation that no single ACID transaction can span by pairing each local transaction with a forward compensating action, so a failure at step k runs compensations k-1 down to 1 and leaves the system as-if-nothing-happened.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:saga_pattern", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "saga_pattern"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "saga_pattern", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P084-C12-U1", "why_it_fits": "SSD authoritative adjudication: If no earlier local transaction succeeds before the later failure, there is nothing to compensate and the defining reverse-order recovery relation for that failure path is absent."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "One participant's local success becomes harmful if another step fails, delays, duplicates, or rejects.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P084-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve at least two transaction participants.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A transaction has multiple participants.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail unsafe or invalid unification, not merely current administrative separation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The participants cannot safely be collapsed into one selected coordination domain.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires non-unifiable database state.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The participants cannot safely share one database domain.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires distinct actor identity or agency.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The participants cannot safely be treated as one actor.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires distinct temporal domains.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The participants cannot safely share one clock.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires distinct authority domains.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The participants cannot safely share one authority.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires non-unifiable rollback scope.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The participants cannot safely share one rollback domain.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Transaction participants cannot safely be collapsed into one database, actor, clock, authority, or rollback domain.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "transaction participants occupy at least one coordination domain that cannot safely be unified", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P084-C13-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Coordinating actors may share one clock, database, and authority.", "slug": "coordination"}], "residual_id": "r:nested_and_distributed_transaction_coordination:b043_a04_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b043_a04_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Participants cannot all be safely treated as one database, one actor, one clock, one authority, or one rollback domain. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Participants cannot all be safely treated as one database, one actor, one clock, one authority, or one rollback domain."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Two service-owned stores may happen to share infrastructure, but the candidate still requires separate transactional scopes that cannot be joined into one ACID transaction, so the rollback-domain branch remains necessary.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Saga Pattern", "one_liner": "Achieve all-or-nothing semantics across a multi-step operation that no single ACID transaction can span by pairing each local transaction with a forward compensating action, so a failure at step k runs compensations k-1 down to 1 and leaves the system as-if-nothing-happened.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:saga_pattern", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "saga_pattern"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "saga_pattern", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P084-C13-U1", "why_it_fits": "SSD authoritative adjudication: If all steps can be joined into one ACID rollback domain, the exact record says a saga is the wrong choice; that counterexample therefore is not a complete saga instance."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Participants have distinct databases, clocks, authorities, or rollback domains that cannot safely collapse into one.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P084-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a multi-participant transaction and its global outcome.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A transaction spans participants, systems, or boundaries whose local states contribute to one global outcome.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail tolerance or coordination through crash failures, not merely acknowledge that it can occur.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The transaction must remain globally correct despite crash failures.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "A distributed transaction must preserve a correct global outcome through participant or system crashes.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "transaction correctness must survive crashes", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P084-C14-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P084-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a multi-participant transaction and its global outcome.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A transaction spans participants, systems, or boundaries whose local states contribute to one global outcome.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail tolerance or coordination through message loss, not merely acknowledge that it can occur.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The transaction must remain globally correct despite message loss.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "A distributed transaction must preserve a correct global outcome despite lost messages.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "transaction correctness must survive message loss", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P084-C14-U2"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P084-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a multi-participant transaction and its global outcome.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A transaction spans participants, systems, or boundaries whose local states contribute to one global outcome.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail tolerance or coordination through timeouts, not merely acknowledge that it can occur.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The transaction must remain globally correct despite timeouts.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "A distributed transaction must preserve a correct global outcome through timeouts.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "transaction correctness must survive timeouts", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P084-C14-U3"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P084-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a multi-participant transaction and its global outcome.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A transaction spans participants, systems, or boundaries whose local states contribute to one global outcome.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail tolerance or coordination through request duplication, not merely acknowledge that it can occur.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The transaction must remain globally correct despite request duplication.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "A distributed transaction must preserve a correct global outcome despite duplicate requests.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "transaction correctness must survive duplicate requests", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P084-C14-U4"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P084-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a multi-participant transaction and its global outcome.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A transaction spans participants, systems, or boundaries whose local states contribute to one global outcome.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail tolerance or coordination through network partition, not merely acknowledge that it can occur.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The transaction must remain globally correct despite network partition.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "A distributed transaction must preserve a correct global outcome through network partitions.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "transaction correctness must survive network partitions", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P084-C14-U5"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P084-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a multi-participant transaction and its global outcome.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A transaction spans participants, systems, or boundaries whose local states contribute to one global outcome.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail tolerance or coordination through human delay, not merely acknowledge that it can occur.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The transaction must remain globally correct despite human delay.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "A distributed transaction must preserve a correct global outcome despite human delay.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "transaction correctness must survive human delay", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P084-C14-U6"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P084-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a multi-participant transaction and its global outcome.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A transaction spans participants, systems, or boundaries whose local states contribute to one global outcome.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail tolerance or coordination through irreversible external effects, not merely acknowledge that it can occur.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The transaction must remain globally correct despite irreversible external effects.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "A distributed transaction with irreversible external side effects must still preserve a correct global outcome.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "transaction correctness must accommodate irreversible external effects", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P084-C14-U7"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Fault tolerance need not coordinate a multi-party transaction or irreversible side effect.", "slug": "fault_tolerance"}], "residual_id": "r:nested_and_distributed_transaction_coordination:b043_a04_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b043_a04_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The system must survive crashes, lost messages, timeouts, duplicate requests, network partitions, human delay, or irreversible external side effects. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The system must survive crashes, lost messages, timeouts, duplicate requests, network partitions, human delay, or irreversible external side effects."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PARTIALLY_DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A participant can crash after prior local commits, yet the durable coordinator and reverse-order compensation rule preserve the semantic global outcome; removing crash durability removes the candidate's stated runtime requirement.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Saga Pattern", "one_liner": "Achieve all-or-nothing semantics across a multi-step operation that no single ACID transaction can span by pairing each local transaction with a forward compensating action, so a failure at step k runs compensations k-1 down to 1 and leaves the system as-if-nothing-happened.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:saga_pattern", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "saga_pattern"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "saga_pattern", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P084-C14-U1", "why_it_fits": "SSD authoritative adjudication: A coordinator whose crash permanently loses compensation state would falsify O2, but the exact record expressly makes durable coordinator state a requirement rather than an optional implementation detail."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "An irreversible step followed by another fallible commit was tested, but the exact record forbids that ordering.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Saga Pattern", "one_liner": "Achieve all-or-nothing semantics across a multi-step operation that no single ACID transaction can span by pairing each local transaction with a forward compensating action, so a failure at step k runs compensations k-1 down to 1 and leaves the system as-if-nothing-happened.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:saga_pattern", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "saga_pattern"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "saga_pattern", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P084-C14-U7", "why_it_fits": "SSD authoritative adjudication: Every saga audits compensation type and orders an irreversible step last, preserving a correct global outcome without pretending that external effects can be rolled back."}], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 7, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 2, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 5}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Fault tolerance need not coordinate a multi-party transaction or irreversible side effect.", "slug": "fault_tolerance"}], "normalized_requirement": "The transaction must survive crashes, loss, duplication, partition, delay, or irreversible external effects.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "PARTIAL_EXISTING_DSA_GROUNDING", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation grounded 2 of 7 eligible atomic units; the remaining unit or units stayed open."}, "predicate": "The transaction must survive crashes, loss, duplication, partition, delay, or irreversible external effects.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P084-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve parent and child transactional scopes.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An outer transaction contains a nested child transaction or workflow.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail local child completion rather than an uncompleted child.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The child completes locally.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve precedence of child completion relative to knowledge of outer closure.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The child's local completion occurs before closure of the outer transaction is known.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve uncertainty about final parent status, not merely later notification of a known status.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Outer transaction closure remains unknown at the time of child completion.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "A nested child transaction can complete locally before the outer transaction's closure is known.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "child transaction completion precedes knowledge of outer closure", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P084-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Replica convergence does not entail nested transactional scopes.", "slug": "eventual_consistency"}], "residual_id": "r:nested_and_distributed_transaction_coordination:b043_a04_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b043_a04_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Nested subtransactions or child workflows can complete locally before outer transaction closure is known. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Nested subtransactions or child workflows can complete locally before outer transaction closure is known."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A child local transaction can commit and later be compensated after a downstream failure; at its commit time the outer outcome is still unresolved, so local completion precedes knowledge of global closure exactly as required.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Saga Pattern", "one_liner": "Achieve all-or-nothing semantics across a multi-step operation that no single ACID transaction can span by pairing each local transaction with a forward compensating action, so a failure at step k runs compensations k-1 down to 1 and leaves the system as-if-nothing-happened.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:saga_pattern", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "saga_pattern"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "saga_pattern", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P084-C15-U1", "why_it_fits": "SSD authoritative adjudication: If a local step does not commit until the whole operation closes, there is no briefly visible intermediate state and no need for forward compensation, contradicting the exact saga mechanism."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Nested child transactions can finish locally before outer closure is known.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P085-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a transaction and an auditor, user, operator, counterparty, or equivalent stakeholder.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A transaction has a stakeholder who must assess its outcome.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve global final status rather than one participant's local state.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The transaction has a final status defined across all participating scopes.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail the evidence requirement, not merely the availability of a status value.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The stakeholder needs evidence of that final global status.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must connect the evidence to verification of the global outcome.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The evidence supports audit or verification of the final status.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "A transaction stakeholder needs auditable evidence of the transaction's final global status.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "transaction stakeholders require evidence of final global status", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P085-C01-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A transaction can be local and immediately observed without cross-party closure evidence.", "slug": "transaction"}], "residual_id": "r:nested_and_distributed_transaction_coordination:b043_a04_c7", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b043_a04_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Auditors, users, operators, or counterparties need evidence of the final global status. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Auditors, users, operators, or counterparties need evidence of the final global status."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A transaction can be local and immediately observed without cross-party closure evidence.", "slug": "transaction"}], "normalized_requirement": "Counterparties need auditable evidence of final global transaction status.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Counterparties need auditable evidence of final global transaction status.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The design must choose between strict atomicity, eventual compensation, escrow/reservation, consensus commit, or auditable reconciliation.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: The design must choose between strict atomicity, eventual compensation, escrow/reservation, consensus commit, or auditable reconciliation. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The design must choose between strict atomicity, eventual compensation, escrow/reservation, consensus commit, or auditable reconciliation."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The design must choose between strict atomicity, eventual compensation, escrow/reservation, consensus commit, or auditable reconciliation."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 43, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-043", "ledger_sha256": "24251df91d9f53e683ffbeb3d833389b3743f7ba7b4512b1bf3ed55c25bc7b42"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Nested Feedback Alignment", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:nested_feedback_alignment", "slug": "nested_feedback_alignment"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 2, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Nested systems often contain multiple feedback loops operating at different scales. A frontline team senses local demand and adjusts staffing. A regional manager sees aggregate utilization and changes resource allocation. A central policy unit sees budget drift and imposes limits. Each loop may be sensible when viewed alone, but their interaction can create delay, contradiction, amplification, or suppressed learning.\n\nThe structural problem appears when feedback loops have incompatible targets, incompatible signal meanings, mismatched update rhythms, or different correction strengths. One loop may optimize throughput while another optimizes reliability. One loop may update daily while another updates quarterly. One loop may treat a local signal as noise while another treats the aggregate trend as proof of failure. The result is not simply “bad feedback.” It is feedback whose nesting has not been aligned.\n\nCommon signatures include local metric success with system-level decline, policy whiplash, repeated escalation confusion, delayed overcorrection, bullwhip effects, and a recurring blame pattern between local and central actors.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Feedback loops at different scales send conflicting signals, optimize incompatible targets, or operate at mismatched speeds, causing local correction to produce larger-scale instability or system-level correction to suppress useful local adaptation."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Coordination can fail without nested feedback or locally sensible correction.", "slug": "coordination"}], "residual_id": "r:nested_feedback_alignment:b043_a05_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b043_a05_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Local teams, subsystems, regions, or agents appear to be making sensible corrections, yet aggregate performance oscillates or deteriorates. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Local teams, subsystems, regions, or agents appear to be making sensible corrections, yet aggregate performance oscillates or deteriorates."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Coordination can fail without nested feedback or locally sensible correction.", "slug": "coordination"}], "normalized_requirement": "Locally sensible corrections coexist with aggregate oscillation or deterioration.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Locally sensible corrections coexist with aggregate oscillation or deterioration.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P085-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve higher governance, lower-level activity, and aggregate signals.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A higher-level governance process receives aggregate signals from lower levels.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must connect the governance response to the aggregate inputs.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Higher-level governance responds to those aggregate signals.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail lateness relative to the response need, not merely slow processing with no consequence.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The response arrives after the effective intervention window.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "Higher-level governance responds to aggregate signals after the response can be effective.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "aggregate-signal governance response arrives too late", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P085-C02-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P085-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve higher-governance and local-knowledge roles.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A higher-level governance process and lower-level actors hold aggregate signals and local knowledge respectively.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must connect the higher-level action to aggregate information.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Higher-level governance acts on aggregate signals.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail displacement or suppression of local knowledge by the higher response.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The higher-level response overrides relevant local knowledge.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Higher-level governance responds to aggregate signals by overriding relevant local knowledge.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "aggregate-signal governance response overrides local knowledge", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P085-C02-U2"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P085-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the governance, aggregate-signal, and policy-response roles.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A higher-level governance process responds to aggregate signals with policy action.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must make the response cause policy whiplash rather than merely coexist with policy change.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The higher-level response creates abrupt or destabilizing policy reversal known as policy whiplash.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Higher-level governance responds to aggregate signals in a way that creates policy whiplash.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "aggregate-signal governance response creates policy whiplash", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P085-C02-U3"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Tiered escalation can be timely and preserve local knowledge.", "slug": "local_autonomy_tiered_escalation"}], "residual_id": "r:nested_feedback_alignment:b043_a05_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b043_a05_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Higher-level governance responds to aggregate signals in ways that arrive too late, override local knowledge, or create policy whiplash. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Higher-level governance responds to aggregate signals in ways that arrive too late, override local knowledge, or create policy whiplash."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PARTIALLY_DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A merely advisory plan was tested, but the candidate requires a prescriptive plan holding coordination authority.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Plan-Execute Gap", "one_liner": "The pathology in which a coarse-grained planning artefact cannot be enacted because the execution layer faces binding fine-grained constraints the planning model never represented — so the fix is constraint propagation and feedback, never a better forecast.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:plan_execute_gap", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "plan_execute_gap"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "plan_execute_gap", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P085-C02-U2", "why_it_fits": "SSD authoritative adjudication: The exact record necessarily combines aggregate planning signals, planning authority, and omitted execution knowledge that the local layer cannot override except by improvisation, directly satisfying the unit."}], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 3, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 1, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 2}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Tiered escalation can be timely and preserve local knowledge.", "slug": "local_autonomy_tiered_escalation"}], "normalized_requirement": "Higher-level responses arrive late, override local knowledge, or create policy whiplash.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "PARTIAL_EXISTING_DSA_GROUNDING", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation grounded 1 of 3 eligible atomic units; the remaining unit or units stayed open."}, "predicate": "Higher-level responses arrive late, override local knowledge, or create policy whiplash.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P085-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve at least two system scales and their metrics, alarms, reviews, incentives, or equivalents.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A system has control signals or evaluation mechanisms at multiple scales.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail scale-local definition without integrated design.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The mechanisms are defined separately at each scale.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve absence of cross-level reaction assessment.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The design does not check how one scale reacts to another scale's correction.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Control signals are defined separately at each scale without checking how one scale reacts to correction at another.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "separately defined scale-level controls omit cross-level reaction checks", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P085-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Calibration aligns output to reference and does not entail nested cross-level reaction.", "slug": "calibration"}], "residual_id": "r:nested_feedback_alignment:b043_a05_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b043_a05_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Metrics, alarms, reviews, or incentives are defined separately at each scale without checking how one level reacts to another level’s correction. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Metrics, alarms, reviews, or incentives are defined separately at each scale without checking how one level reacts to another level’s correction."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Calibration aligns output to reference and does not entail nested cross-level reaction.", "slug": "calibration"}], "normalized_requirement": "Metrics and incentives at each scale ignore reactions to correction at other scales.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Metrics and incentives at each scale ignore reactions to correction at other scales.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P085-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve both local and central authority regimes.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A system has local-autonomy and central-intervention authority states.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail recurrence rather than one exceptional transfer.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Authority repeatedly alternates between the two regimes.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve absent stable transition governance, not a clear rule that is occasionally violated.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "No stable rule governs escalation, de-escalation, or authority return.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Authority repeatedly alternates between local autonomy and central intervention without a stable rule governing authority transitions.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "local-central authority oscillation persists without stable transition rules", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P085-C04-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime supplies explicit thresholds and feedback, the opposite of an unstable authority rule.", "slug": "local_autonomy_tiered_escalation"}], "residual_id": "r:nested_feedback_alignment:b043_a05_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b043_a05_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A system repeatedly alternates between local autonomy and central intervention without a stable rule for escalation, de-escalation, or authority return. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A system repeatedly alternates between local autonomy and central intervention without a stable rule for escalation, de-escalation, or authority return."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime supplies explicit thresholds and feedback, the opposite of an unstable authority rule.", "slug": "local_autonomy_tiered_escalation"}], "normalized_requirement": "Authority alternates between local autonomy and central intervention without stable escalation or return rules.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Authority alternates between local autonomy and central intervention without stable escalation or return rules.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P085-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve multiple scale-level feedback processes.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A system contains feedback loops operating at different scales.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail response delay, not immediate over-response.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A corrective response is delayed relative to the condition it addresses.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve overshoot or excessive correction following the delay.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The delayed response overcorrects the system.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must connect the observed pattern to nested feedback-loop misalignment.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The delayed overcorrection is evidence of cross-scale loop misalignment.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "A system's delayed overcorrection reveals misalignment among feedback loops operating at different scales.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "delayed overcorrection signals cross-scale feedback-loop misalignment", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P085-C05-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P085-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a system with multiple linked levels or scales.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A multilevel flow or decision system contains linked feedback loops.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail the amplification structure of a bullwhip effect.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Variability or correction is amplified as it propagates across levels.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must connect the observed amplification to nested feedback-loop misalignment.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The bullwhip amplification is evidence of cross-scale loop misalignment.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "A bullwhip effect reveals misalignment among feedback loops operating at different scales.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "bullwhip amplification signals cross-scale feedback-loop misalignment", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P085-C05-U2"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P085-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a level-specific metric and actors responding to it.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A multiscale system uses a KPI at one level to direct or evaluate behavior.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail metric-responsive behavior that harms or defeats a cross-level objective.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Actors game the KPI in a way that is counterproductive at another system level.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must connect KPI gaming to incompatible feedback across scales.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The counterproductive gaming is evidence of cross-scale loop misalignment.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Counterproductive KPI gaming reveals misalignment among feedback loops operating at different scales.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "counterproductive KPI gaming signals cross-scale feedback-loop misalignment", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P085-C05-U3"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P085-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve multiple levels participating in the blame relation.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Actors or governance processes occupy at least two system levels.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail a feedback loop of cross-level attribution rather than one isolated accusation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Blame cycles recurrently across those levels.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must connect recurrent cross-level blame to nested-loop misalignment.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The blame loop is evidence of cross-scale feedback misalignment.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "A cross-level blame loop reveals misalignment among feedback loops operating at different scales.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "cross-level blame cycling signals feedback-loop misalignment", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P085-C05-U4"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Systems thinking may diagnose many structures and does not entail this observed nested-loop failure.", "slug": "systems_thinking"}], "residual_id": "r:nested_feedback_alignment:b043_a05_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b043_a05_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A technical, organizational, ecological, or public system shows delayed overcorrection, bullwhip effects, counterproductive KPI gaming, or cross-level blame loops. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A technical, organizational, ecological, or public system shows delayed overcorrection, bullwhip effects, counterproductive KPI gaming, or cross-level blame loops."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PARTIALLY_DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Real volatile end demand was tested, but the exact record excludes it and requires policy-generated amplification across tiers.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Order-Batching Distortion", "one_liner": "The supply-chain failure in which a lumpy ordering rule converts smooth downstream consumption into artificial order spikes and troughs, which each upstream tier misreads as real demand and amplifies — one of the four canonical causes of the bullwhip effect.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:order_batching_distortion", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "order_batching_distortion"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "order_batching_distortion", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P085-C05-U2", "why_it_fits": "SSD authoritative adjudication: Order-batching distortion is a canonical bullwhip cause whose exact definition necessarily entails linked tier responses, cross-level amplification, and the resulting diagnosis of interface-loop misalignment."}], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 4, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 1, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 3}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Systems thinking may diagnose many structures and does not entail this observed nested-loop failure.", "slug": "systems_thinking"}], "normalized_requirement": "Delayed overcorrection, bullwhip, KPI gaming, or cross-level blame reveals nested-loop misalignment.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "PARTIAL_EXISTING_DSA_GROUNDING", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation grounded 1 of 4 eligible atomic units; the remaining unit or units stayed open."}, "predicate": "Delayed overcorrection, bullwhip, KPI gaming, or cross-level blame reveals nested-loop misalignment.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 43, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-043", "ledger_sha256": "24251df91d9f53e683ffbeb3d833389b3743f7ba7b4512b1bf3ed55c25bc7b42"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Net-Additive Contribution Intake", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:net_additive_contribution_intake", "slug": "net_additive_contribution_intake"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 5, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system receives unsolicited, well-intended offers of labor, goods, code, data, ideas, access, or support. The offer looks additive at the boundary, but a scarce coordinator must evaluate, translate, supervise, integrate, communicate, maintain, and eventually retire it. Because refusal carries relational or reputational cost, the system admits, delays, or informally handles offers beyond its absorptive capacity, causing primary-work displacement, queue growth, hidden obligations, and resentment.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system receives unsolicited, well-intended offers of labor, goods, code, data, ideas, access, or support. The offer looks additive at the boundary, but a scarce coordinator must evaluate, translate, supervise, integrate, communicate, maintain, and eventually retire it. Because refusal carries relational or reputational cost, the system admits, delays, or informally handles offers beyond its absorptive capacity, causing primary-work displacement, queue growth, hidden obligations, and resentment."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Unsolicited contributions presented as help are the defining inflow.", "role_mapping": "Offers -> pro-social inflow; contributor initiation -> unsolicited arrival.", "slug": "helpful_inflow_displacement", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b043_a06_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Offers are initiated by contributors rather than pulled from a current, bounded demand signal. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Offers are initiated by contributors rather than pulled from a current, bounded demand signal."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Helpful-Inflow Displacement", "one_liner": "Unsolicited, pro-socially motivated inflow whose coordination cost exceeds its operational value displaces rather than augments the primary work, because a coordinator-gate must absorb the handling cost and the social cost of refusal blocks clean decline.", "page_ref": "prime:helpful_inflow_displacement", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Offers -> pro-social inflow; contributor initiation -> unsolicited arrival.", "slug": "helpful_inflow_displacement", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Unsolicited contributions presented as help are the defining inflow."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Pro-social contributions arrive unsolicited rather than from a bounded demand signal.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "All inflow passes through a coordinator gate that draws on the same finite attention budget as primary work.", "role_mapping": "Receiving system -> coordinator gate; expert attention -> shared budget; handling -> coordination cost.", "slug": "helpful_inflow_displacement", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b043_a06_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The receiving system must spend scarce expert attention or coordination capacity before value can be realized. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The receiving system must spend scarce expert attention or coordination capacity before value can be realized."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Helpful-Inflow Displacement", "one_liner": "Unsolicited, pro-socially motivated inflow whose coordination cost exceeds its operational value displaces rather than augments the primary work, because a coordinator-gate must absorb the handling cost and the social cost of refusal blocks clean decline.", "page_ref": "prime:helpful_inflow_displacement", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Receiving system -> coordinator gate; expert attention -> shared budget; handling -> coordination cost.", "slug": "helpful_inflow_displacement", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "All inflow passes through a coordinator gate that draws on the same finite attention budget as primary work."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A coordinator must spend scarce expert attention before contribution value can be realized.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The pro-social framing creates a refusal cost that blocks clean decline even when net value is negative.", "role_mapping": "Respectful decline -> refusal; prosocial offer -> help framing; missing process -> social cost.", "slug": "helpful_inflow_displacement", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b043_a06_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The organization lacks a normalized, respectful way to redirect, defer, or decline prosocial offers. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The organization lacks a normalized, respectful way to redirect, defer, or decline prosocial offers."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Helpful-Inflow Displacement", "one_liner": "Unsolicited, pro-socially motivated inflow whose coordination cost exceeds its operational value displaces rather than augments the primary work, because a coordinator-gate must absorb the handling cost and the social cost of refusal blocks clean decline.", "page_ref": "prime:helpful_inflow_displacement", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Respectful decline -> refusal; prosocial offer -> help framing; missing process -> social cost.", "slug": "helpful_inflow_displacement", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The pro-social framing creates a refusal cost that blocks clean decline even when net value is negative."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Social cost makes respectful redirection, deferral, or refusal difficult.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The coordinator's finite shared attention means handling inflow displaces the primary operation above a volume threshold.", "role_mapping": "Primary work -> protected operation; near capacity -> finite attention budget.", "slug": "helpful_inflow_displacement", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b043_a06_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Primary work is delay-sensitive, interruption-sensitive, safety-critical, or already near capacity. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Primary work is delay-sensitive, interruption-sensitive, safety-critical, or already near capacity."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Helpful-Inflow Displacement", "one_liner": "Unsolicited, pro-socially motivated inflow whose coordination cost exceeds its operational value displaces rather than augments the primary work, because a coordinator-gate must absorb the handling cost and the social cost of refusal blocks clean decline.", "page_ref": "prime:helpful_inflow_displacement", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Primary work -> protected operation; near capacity -> finite attention budget.", "slug": "helpful_inflow_displacement", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The coordinator's finite shared attention means handling inflow displaces the primary operation above a volume threshold."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Primary work is interruption-sensitive, delay-sensitive, safety-critical, or near capacity.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Operational value is explicitly compared with coordination cost, so sincere help can displace rather than augment work.", "role_mapping": "Contribution value -> operational value; recipient budget -> coordination cost; net-negative -> displacement.", "slug": "helpful_inflow_displacement", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b043_a06_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A contribution may be valuable in principle but unsuitable for the current recipient, time window, format, or support budget. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A contribution may be valuable in principle but unsuitable for the current recipient, time window, format, or support budget."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Helpful-Inflow Displacement", "one_liner": "Unsolicited, pro-socially motivated inflow whose coordination cost exceeds its operational value displaces rather than augments the primary work, because a coordinator-gate must absorb the handling cost and the social cost of refusal blocks clean decline.", "page_ref": "prime:helpful_inflow_displacement", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Contribution value -> operational value; recipient budget -> coordination cost; net-negative -> displacement.", "slug": "helpful_inflow_displacement", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Operational value is explicitly compared with coordination cost, so sincere help can displace rather than augment work."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A contribution can be valuable in principle yet net-negative for this recipient, format, time, or support budget.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Offer fit, quality, timing, restrictions, provenance, maintenance, or exit obligations are uncertain.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system must preserve openness, dignity, trust, and future cooperation without treating every offer as an obligation or externalizing its hidden coordination cost onto primary workers. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Offer fit, quality, timing, restrictions, provenance, maintenance, or exit obligations are uncertain. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Offer fit, quality, timing, restrictions, provenance, maintenance, or exit obligations are uncertain.", "A system must preserve openness, dignity, trust, and future cooperation without treating every offer as an obligation or externalizing its hidden coordination cost onto primary workers."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Offer fit, quality, timing, restrictions, provenance, maintenance, or exit obligations are uncertain."}, {"display_text": "Side channels, personal relationships, publicity, executive escalation, or direct delivery can bypass ordinary intake.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Side channels, personal relationships, publicity, executive escalation, or direct delivery can bypass ordinary intake. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Side channels, personal relationships, publicity, executive escalation, or direct delivery can bypass ordinary intake."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Side channels, personal relationships, publicity, executive escalation, or direct delivery can bypass ordinary intake."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 43, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-043", "ledger_sha256": "24251df91d9f53e683ffbeb3d833389b3743f7ba7b4512b1bf3ed55c25bc7b42"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Network Effect Bootstrapping", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:network_effect_bootstrapping", "slug": "network_effect_bootstrapping"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a cold-start loop. A system becomes valuable only after enough people, organizations, compatible implementations, complements, content, or data points participate. But each potential participant evaluates the system before that participation exists. The result is hesitation, sparse adoption, churn, or empty infrastructure.\n\nThe characteristic phrase is: “I would join if others were already there.” Buyers wait for sellers; sellers wait for buyers. Developers wait for users; users wait for integrations. Institutions wait for standards adoption; standards adoption waits for institutions. A broad launch can make the problem worse if it spreads scarce participation so thinly that no one experiences value anywhere.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A product, platform, standard, marketplace, protocol, community, dataset, or shared system is not useful enough to attract participants until enough participants already exist, creating a cold-start loop where rational individual hesitation prevents collective network value from forming."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Each side's marginal value rises with participation on the other side through cross-side network effects.", "role_mapping": "Participants or complements -> platform sides; rising value -> cross-side externality.", "slug": "two_sided_market", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b043_a07_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The value of participation rises as more relevant participants, compatible nodes, complements, data, content, or transactions exist. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The value of participation rises as more relevant participants, compatible nodes, complements, data, content, or transactions exist."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Two Sided Market", "one_liner": "A platform mediates two distinct user groups whose participation creates value for each other, so each side's marginal value rises with the other side's size and the two demand schedules must be balanced together.", "page_ref": "prime:two_sided_market", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Participants or complements -> platform sides; rising value -> cross-side externality.", "slug": "two_sided_market", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Each side's marginal value rises with participation on the other side through cross-side network effects."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A participant's value rises as relevant participants, complements, content, data, or transactions increase.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P085-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the early participant, network, and current not-yet-fully-useful state without requiring later network success.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An early participant joins or uses a network that is not yet fully useful.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the burden during the network's incomplete-utility state, without presupposing that full utility is later reached.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The participant bears the selected burden while the network is not yet fully useful.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a real participation cost.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The early participant bears a direct cost.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires exposure to risk.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The early participant bears risk.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires material uncertainty.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The early participant bears uncertainty.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires foregone alternatives caused by early participation.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The early participant bears opportunity cost.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "An early participant bears a real cost, risk, uncertainty, or opportunity cost while the network is not yet fully useful.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "early participation imposes a listed burden while network utility remains incomplete", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P085-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An access catchment does not entail early adopter cost or a network value threshold.", "slug": "access_catchment"}], "residual_id": "r:network_effect_bootstrapping:b043_a07_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b043_a07_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Early participants face a real cost, risk, uncertainty, or opportunity cost before the network is fully useful. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Early participants face a real cost, risk, uncertainty, or opportunity cost before the network is fully useful."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An access catchment does not entail early adopter cost or a network value threshold.", "slug": "access_catchment"}], "normalized_requirement": "Early participants bear cost or uncertainty before the network becomes useful.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Early participants bear cost or uncertainty before the network becomes useful.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The reproduction-ratio threshold is the minimum quantity above which the process sustains itself.", "role_mapping": "Participation density -> interacting quantity; self-reinforcing adoption -> reproduction above one.", "slug": "critical_mass", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b043_a07_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: There is a plausible critical mass threshold that can be reached with bounded seeding, incentives, compatibility, or staged launch. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["There is a plausible critical mass threshold that can be reached with bounded seeding, incentives, compatibility, or staged launch."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Critical Mass", "one_liner": "The minimum quantity needed to sustain a self-perpetuating process.", "page_ref": "prime:critical_mass", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Participation density -> interacting quantity; self-reinforcing adoption -> reproduction above one.", "slug": "critical_mass", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The reproduction-ratio threshold is the minimum quantity above which the process sustains itself."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A minimum participation density separates decay from self-sustaining growth.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Distinct non-interchangeable sides generate cross-side value and coupled demand.", "role_mapping": "Roles -> platform sides; mutual value -> cross-side externality.", "slug": "two_sided_market", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b043_a07_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The system has identifiable participant sides, roles, or contribution types whose presence creates value for each other. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The system has identifiable participant sides, roles, or contribution types whose presence creates value for each other."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Two Sided Market", "one_liner": "A platform mediates two distinct user groups whose participation creates value for each other, so each side's marginal value rises with the other side's size and the two demand schedules must be balanced together.", "page_ref": "prime:two_sided_market", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Roles -> platform sides; mutual value -> cross-side externality.", "slug": "two_sided_market", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Distinct non-interchangeable sides generate cross-side value and coupled demand."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Distinct participant roles create value for one another through their presence.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Initial utility can be created before full scale through seeded content, anchor users, guaranteed counterparties, local density, compatibility bridges, or standalone features.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: Initial utility can be created before full scale through seeded content, anchor users, guaranteed counterparties, local density, compatibility bridges, or standalone features. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Initial utility can be created before full scale through seeded content, anchor users, guaranteed counterparties, local density, compatibility bridges, or standalone features."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Initial utility can be created before full scale through seeded content, anchor users, guaranteed counterparties, local density, compatibility bridges, or standalone features."}, {"display_text": "Growth can be monitored through realized use value rather than only signups or publicity.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: Growth can be monitored through realized use value rather than only signups or publicity. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Growth can be monitored through realized use value rather than only signups or publicity."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Growth can be monitored through realized use value rather than only signups or publicity."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 43, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-043", "ledger_sha256": "24251df91d9f53e683ffbeb3d833389b3743f7ba7b4512b1bf3ed55c25bc7b42"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Network Effect Governance", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:network_effect_governance", "slug": "network_effect_governance"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 3, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is that network effects create a double edge. Participation makes the network more valuable, which attracts more participation, which increases value again. Once that loop succeeds, the network can become difficult to leave. A user may stay because friends, data, history, customers, suppliers, reputation, or workflows are there. A developer may depend on an API. A seller may depend on marketplace liquidity. A community may depend on a shared identity or communication layer.\n\nThat dependence can be exploited or mishandled. Access can become arbitrary. Interfaces can be changed to strand complementors. Dominant actors can self-preference. Abuse can spread at network scale. Standards can be captured. A single hub can become a systemic point of failure. The problem is not that the network is valuable; the problem is that value has become power without enough accountability, exit, interoperability, safety, or resilience.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A networked system has reached or approached self-reinforcing scale, but the resulting density, compatibility, reputation, data, or social graph effects make participants dependent on shared control points. The network remains valuable, yet unchecked power can produce lock-in, exclusion, self-preferencing, abuse, unfair access, brittle dependency, or captured governance."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Cross-side network effects make platform value depend on the installed participation of the other side.", "role_mapping": "Network -> platform; participation value -> cross-side externality; outside replacement -> missing other side.", "slug": "two_sided_market", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b043_a08_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Network participation creates value that is hard to reproduce outside the current network. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Network participation creates value that is hard to reproduce outside the current network."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Two Sided Market", "one_liner": "A platform mediates two distinct user groups whose participation creates value for each other, so each side's marginal value rises with the other side's size and the two demand schedules must be balanced together.", "page_ref": "prime:two_sided_market", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Network -> platform; participation value -> cross-side externality; outside replacement -> missing other side.", "slug": "two_sided_market", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Cross-side network effects make platform value depend on the installed participation of the other side."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Participation in the current network creates value difficult to reproduce outside it.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "State unload, load, cold-start, and residual interference create a distinct per-transition overhead.", "role_mapping": "Network exit or multi-home -> transition; participant state -> loaded mode; cost -> switching overhead.", "slug": "switching_cost", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b043_a08_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Users, producers, developers, institutions, or communities face high switching or multi-homing costs. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Users, producers, developers, institutions, or communities face high switching or multi-homing costs."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Switching Cost", "one_liner": "Moving between stateful modes incurs a per-transition overhead — unload, load, cold-start, residual interference — that is structurally distinct from steady-state cost and dominates under frequent switching.", "page_ref": "prime:switching_cost", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Network exit or multi-home -> transition; participant state -> loaded mode; cost -> switching overhead.", "slug": "switching_cost", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "State unload, load, cold-start, and residual interference create a distinct per-transition overhead."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Participants face substantial overhead when switching modes or networks.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P085-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a dominant actor situated in a networked system.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A network has a dominant operator, hub, standard-setter, participant group, or equivalent control actor.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a critical network participation resource.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The network has a resource governing participation or position, such as access, visibility, compatibility, reputation, identity, or data.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail control or gatekeeping, not mere influence or high usage.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The dominant actor controls that critical resource.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "A dominant network actor controls a critical participation resource.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "a dominant network actor controls a critical participation resource", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P085-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A broker can connect peers without dominating access or identity.", "slug": "network_broker_role"}], "residual_id": "r:network_effect_governance:b043_a08_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b043_a08_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A dominant operator, hub, standard-setter, or participant group controls access, visibility, compatibility, reputation, identity, or data. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A dominant operator, hub, standard-setter, or participant group controls access, visibility, compatibility, reputation, identity, or data."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A merely large but non-hub class was tested, but the exact record expressly excludes it.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "God Object Anti-Pattern", "one_liner": "Diagnose a maintenance mess as concentrated rather than diffuse: one class or service accumulates outlier fan-in and fan-out to become the integration hub, collapsing modularity so all change-cost, comprehension, and new features funnel through that single node.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:god_object_anti_pattern", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "god_object_anti_pattern"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "god_object_anti_pattern", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P085-C07-U1", "why_it_fits": "SSD authoritative adjudication: Every god object is an outlier hub whose centralized coupling gates the rest of the component network through one integration point, directly satisfying all roles and control direction."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A non-networked trade union still instantiates oligarchy, defeating DIRECT; a networked membership organization preserves all native control relations.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Iron law of oligarchy", "one_liner": "Michels's thesis that large democratic organizations inevitably develop entrenched professional leadership — not through betrayal but through three structural forces (technical necessity, mass passivity, leader self-interest) — so the 'iron' resolves into whether counter-mechanisms engage.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:iron_law_of_oligarchy", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "organization_is_networked_membership_organization", "predicate": "the democratic organization is a networked membership organization", "rationale": "The exact-record mapping satisfies one complete DNF branch, preserves typed roles and direction, and the single qualifier is anchored, atomic, and sufficient."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "iron_law_of_oligarchy"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "organization_is_networked_membership_organization"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "iron_law_of_oligarchy", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P085-C07-U1", "why_it_fits": "SSD authoritative adjudication: The oligarchic control spine is exact, but the candidate ranges over organizations generally; one domain restriction to a networked membership organization fills the remaining network type."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A dominant hub controls access, compatibility, reputation, identity, visibility, or data.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P085-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the network-rule, unilateral-controller, and dependent-participant roles.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A network has rules, a rule-controlling actor, and dependent ecosystem participants.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail unilateral change capacity rather than multilateral revision.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The controller can change network rules unilaterally.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must connect the rule change causally to ecosystem harm.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A unilateral rule change produces the selected harm to dependent participants.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires complementors whose investments or integrations are stranded.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The unilateral change strands complementors.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires adverse treatment of participants dependent on the network.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The unilateral change disadvantages dependent participants.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A network controller can change rules unilaterally, thereby stranding complementors or disadvantaging dependent participants.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "unilateral network-rule change harms dependent ecosystem participants", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P085-C08-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Change notification can be bilateral and does not entail unilateral control or stranded participants.", "slug": "change_notification"}], "residual_id": "r:network_effect_governance:b043_a08_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b043_a08_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Network rules can be changed unilaterally in ways that strand complementors or disadvantage dependent participants. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Network rules can be changed unilaterally in ways that strand complementors or disadvantage dependent participants."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Change notification can be bilateral and does not entail unilateral control or stranded participants.", "slug": "change_notification"}], "normalized_requirement": "Network rules can change unilaterally and strand dependent complementors.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Network rules can change unilaterally and strand dependent complementors.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P085-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a network and its scale as the amplification substrate.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A network has a scale or reach capable of affecting propagation or impact.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must make scale increase the harm's spread, frequency, reach, or impact.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Network scale amplifies the selected harm.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires abuse as the amplified harm.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The amplified harm is abuse.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires fraud as the amplified harm.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The amplified harm is fraud.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires exclusion as the amplified harm.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The amplified harm is exclusion.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires misinformation as the amplified harm.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The amplified harm is misinformation.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Network scale amplifies abuse, fraud, exclusion, or misinformation.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "network scale amplifies a listed social or transactional harm", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P085-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Scale-dependent behavior need not involve a network or harmful amplification.", "slug": "scaling_and_scale_dependence"}], "residual_id": "r:network_effect_governance:b043_a08_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b043_a08_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Abuse, fraud, exclusion, or misinformation becomes amplified by network scale. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Abuse, fraud, exclusion, or misinformation becomes amplified by network scale."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "I tested one bespoke downstream application built on the compromised component; the DSA holds but the guard does not. Under multiple reuse, one planted abuse reaches multiple systems without additional downstream attacks, so network scale amplifies it.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Transfer-Learning Attack", "one_liner": "Vulnerabilities, backdoors, or poisoned representations baked into an upstream pretrained model ride intact into every downstream system built on it, because the downstream team's audit boundary encloses only its new layers while the attack surface spans the whole inherited substrate.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:transfer_learning_attack", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1", "O2"], "guard_type": "QUANTIFIER_BINDING", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "compromised_component_reused_by_multiple_downstream_systems", "predicate": "The compromised upstream component is reused by multiple downstream systems.", "rationale": "The exact-record mapping satisfies one complete DNF branch, preserves typed roles and direction, and the single qualifier is anchored, atomic, and sufficient."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "transfer_learning_attack"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The compromised upstream component is reused by multiple downstream systems."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "transfer_learning_attack", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P085-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "SSD authoritative adjudication: A complete attack can affect only one downstream build, so the exact candidate alone does not universally establish scale amplification. With multiple downstream reusers fixed, the same upstream attack necessarily propagates to each through the inherited substrate."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "I tested a networked public spreading accurate emergency guidance; the DSA holds but the guard does not. Under the guard, misinformation is the same content that the exact spreadability and visibility affordances amplify, so no second fact is required.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Networked Publics", "one_liner": "danah boyd's framework for how publics are structurally transformed on networked digital platforms by four architectural affordances — persistence, visibility, spreadability, searchability — which compound into context collapse and the invisible-audience problem and flip sociability from private-by-default to public-by-default.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:networked_publics", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2", "O6"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "networked_public_content_is_misinformation", "predicate": "The content amplified through the networked public is misinformation.", "rationale": "The exact-record mapping satisfies one complete DNF branch, preserves typed roles and direction, and the single qualifier is anchored, atomic, and sufficient."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "networked_publics"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The content amplified through the networked public is misinformation."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "networked_publics", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P085-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "SSD authoritative adjudication: Without fixing the spreadable content as misinformation, the framework can amplify benign content and O6 is false. With the one content-type guard, visibility, spreadability, and algorithmic amplification necessarily increase its reach."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Abuse, fraud, exclusion, or misinformation is amplified by network scale.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P085-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve concentration of a critical network role or resource.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A network's critical capacity or control is centralized or concentrated.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must make concentration causal for the vulnerability.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The concentration creates the selected system-level vulnerability.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires increased system-level susceptibility to disruption.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The created vulnerability is systemic fragility.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires one concentrated component whose failure can disable the system.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The created vulnerability is a single point of failure.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Centralization or concentration of a network creates systemic fragility or a single point of failure.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "network concentration causes systemic fragility or single-point failure", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P085-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Systemic risk can arise in a distributed densely coupled network with no central point of failure.", "slug": "systemic_risk"}], "residual_id": "r:network_effect_governance:b043_a08_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b043_a08_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Centralization or concentration creates systemic fragility or a single point of failure. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Centralization or concentration creates systemic fragility or a single point of failure."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A large depositor count was tested, but the exact record rejects count as protection when withdrawals are correlated.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Deposit Concentration Risk", "one_liner": "Judge a bank's funding fragility by the correlation-adjusted effective depositor count rather than the headline number — coupled depositors collapse toward one bet, voiding the law-of-large-numbers smoothing a large base seems to guarantee.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:deposit_concentration_risk", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "deposit_concentration_risk"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "deposit_concentration_risk", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P085-C10-U1", "why_it_fits": "SSD authoritative adjudication: Every deposit-concentration instance makes nominally distributed funding act as one coupled bet whose synchronized withdrawal can threaten the whole otherwise-solvent institution."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "An excellent sole supplier was tested, but the exact record says performance does not remove the concentration exposure.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Supplier Concentration Risk", "one_liner": "Exposure that arises when a buyer's dependency for a critical input rests on so few suppliers that one node's disruption propagates downstream faster than alternatives can be qualified — a shape property of the dependency distribution, not of any supplier's performance.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:supplier_concentration_risk", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "supplier_concentration_risk"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "supplier_concentration_risk", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P085-C10-U1", "why_it_fits": "SSD authoritative adjudication: The exact candidate necessarily turns concentrated dependency into one-node loss sensitivity, directly entailing the single-point-of-failure branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Several staff may operate incident command, but all unsolicited inflow forms still compete for the same centralized coordination bandwidth; overload of that point creates the exact secondary crisis.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Convergence Failure", "one_liner": "The disaster-management pathology in which uncoordinated pro-social inflows — volunteers, donations, inquiries — arrive faster than incident command can absorb, consuming the same coordination bandwidth the primary hazard needs and triggering a second disaster.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:convergence_failure", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "convergence_failure"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "convergence_failure", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P085-C10-U1", "why_it_fits": "SSD authoritative adjudication: Without a common coordination bottleneck, the exact record says the pathology dissolves into ordinary capacity management; every complete instance therefore contains the concentration-to-failure relation."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A large non-hub class was tested, but the exact record excludes it; concentration of coupling is constitutive.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "God Object Anti-Pattern", "one_liner": "Diagnose a maintenance mess as concentrated rather than diffuse: one class or service accumulates outlier fan-in and fan-out to become the integration hub, collapsing modularity so all change-cost, comprehension, and new features funnel through that single node.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:god_object_anti_pattern", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "god_object_anti_pattern"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "god_object_anti_pattern", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P085-C10-U1", "why_it_fits": "SSD authoritative adjudication: Although the exact record distinguishes runtime reliability SPOF, every god object necessarily creates system-level maintenance and comprehension fragility through hub concentration, satisfying the systemic-fragility branch."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Concentration creates systemic fragility or a single point of failure.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 43, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-043", "ledger_sha256": "24251df91d9f53e683ffbeb3d833389b3743f7ba7b4512b1bf3ed55c25bc7b42"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Network Flow Optimization", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:network_flow_optimization", "slug": "network_flow_optimization"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is end-to-end movement constrained by a network. Local actors may optimize their own handoff, local queue, local route, or local metric while the whole system remains congested, costly, unreliable, or unfair. One team may forward work rapidly into a downstream bottleneck. A logistics node may appear efficient while creating expensive routing elsewhere. A hospital department may be blamed for delay when the true constraint is downstream bed capacity or discharge flow.\n\nThe deeper issue is that flow feasibility is shaped by the whole topology. A link that looks adequate in isolation may be unusable because an upstream source cannot reach it, a downstream sink cannot absorb it, or a parallel path has incompatible constraints.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A flow network has constrained paths, bottlenecks, costs, handoff losses, or imbalanced supply and demand, but routing decisions are made locally or heuristically without seeing how the whole topology constrains feasible movement."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The model requires directed graph paths carrying flow with conservation at internal nodes.", "role_mapping": "Movement -> flow; paths -> edges; connected system -> graph.", "slug": "network_flow_models", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b043_a09_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Movement occurs through connected paths rather than through a single queue or pool. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Movement occurs through connected paths rather than through a single queue or pool."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Network Flow Models", "one_liner": "Optimize flow across networks.", "page_ref": "prime:network_flow_models", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Movement -> flow; paths -> edges; connected system -> graph.", "slug": "network_flow_models", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The model requires directed graph paths carrying flow with conservation at internal nodes."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A conserved quantity moves through multiple connected paths in a graph.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Capacity and cost are specified on edges or nodes to constrain and price flow.", "role_mapping": "Links -> edges; capacities or costs -> flow constraints and weights.", "slug": "network_flow_models", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b043_a09_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Different links or nodes have different capacities, costs, risks, or service times. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Different links or nodes have different capacities, costs, risks, or service times."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Network Flow Models", "one_liner": "Optimize flow across networks.", "page_ref": "prime:network_flow_models", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Links -> edges; capacities or costs -> flow constraints and weights.", "slug": "network_flow_models", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Capacity and cost are specified on edges or nodes to constrain and price flow."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Links or nodes have heterogeneous capacities, costs, risks, or service times.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P085-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"], ["O1", "O3"], ["O1", "O4"], ["O1", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a network with origins and destinations of flow.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A flow network has source and sink roles.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a source-sink imbalance.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The sources and sinks are imbalanced in supply, capacity, or demand.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires spatial separation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The sources and sinks are geographically separated.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires separation across organizations or governance domains.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The sources and sinks are institutionally separated.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires separation in logical, protocol, or system topology.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The sources and sinks are logically separated.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A flow network's sources and sinks are imbalanced or separated geographically, institutionally, or logically.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "flow-network sources and sinks have a listed imbalance or separation", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P085-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A reservoir-flux network can be balanced and need not pose a routing optimization problem.", "slug": "reservoir_flux_network"}], "residual_id": "r:network_flow_optimization:b043_a09_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b043_a09_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Sources and sinks are imbalanced or geographically, institutionally, or logically separated. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Sources and sinks are imbalanced or geographically, institutionally, or logically separated."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Fine-tuning may lightly update inherited weights, but the upstream component remains a logically separate origin and the downstream applications remain destinations of the propagated representation, preserving the branch.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Transfer-Learning Attack", "one_liner": "Vulnerabilities, backdoors, or poisoned representations baked into an upstream pretrained model ride intact into every downstream system built on it, because the downstream team's audit boundary encloses only its new layers while the attack surface spans the whole inherited substrate.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:transfer_learning_attack", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "transfer_learning_attack"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "transfer_learning_attack", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P085-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "SSD authoritative adjudication: If there is no separate upstream substrate and downstream build, the exact candidate's audit-boundary mismatch and inheritance channel disappear, so a complete instance cannot collapse those roles."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "The interpreter may be colocated with the input handler, but untrusted data and executable control remain logically distinct protocol roles; their erroneous conflation is precisely the candidate's failure mode.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Injection Weakness", "one_liner": "The software-security failure in which untrusted data crosses into a control channel and a downstream interpreter executes it as command, query, or instruction — a collapse of the data/control boundary that a legitimate, often credential-free, input channel is enough to exploit.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:injection_weakness", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "injection_weakness"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "injection_weakness", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P085-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "SSD authoritative adjudication: If no untrusted source-to-interpreter flow crosses a data/control boundary, the exact candidate has neither injection nor the downstream execution relation and is not a complete instance."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "The same storage system may hold both partitions, but their protocol roles remain logically separated; the candidate requires information to cross that exact boundary into training-derived parameters.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Imputation Leakage", "one_liner": "The model-evaluation failure in which a missing-value repair step is fit across the train/test boundary, so its parameters encode facts about the held-out rows — inflating performance that survives into the test metric, because imputation, mentally filed as data cleaning, is really a model.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:imputation_leakage", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "imputation_leakage"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "imputation_leakage", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P085-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "SSD authoritative adjudication: If the repair step is fit only on training data, no flow crosses from held-out rows and the exact leakage candidate is absent."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A source coincident with the outlet was tested, but a watershed's contributing area and drainage routing necessarily extend upstream of it.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Watershed", "one_liner": "Bound the space of contributing sources for any point in a river to the terrain-defined area draining to a common outlet, then exploit the asymmetric upstream-downstream coupling — everything propagates down, nothing back up against gravity — to fix search direction and intervention shape.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:watershed", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "watershed"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "watershed", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P085-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "SSD authoritative adjudication: Every watershed has geographically distributed contributing sources and a distinct common outlet connected by a directional routing network, satisfying the geographic-separation branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Several venues may be controlled by one publisher, but each citation hop remains a logically distinct receiving and retransmitting node in the provenance chain, satisfying logical separation.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Quote Laundering", "one_liner": "A provisional but accurate statement is cited across successive venues that each strip its caveats and scope, until it circulates as authoritative settled fact — a channel failure, not a false source, so it resists source correction and needs traceability instead.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:quote_laundering", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "quote_laundering"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "quote_laundering", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P085-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "SSD authoritative adjudication: Without a source statement and at least one downstream citation venue, the exact cumulative caveat-stripping mechanism cannot occur, so every complete instance preserves source and sink roles."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Highly coordinated depositors may behave as one effective source, but they remain institutionally distinct from the bank receiving their funding, so the separation branch remains true.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Deposit Concentration Risk", "one_liner": "Judge a bank's funding fragility by the correlation-adjusted effective depositor count rather than the headline number — coupled depositors collapse toward one bet, voiding the law-of-large-numbers smoothing a large base seems to guarantee.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:deposit_concentration_risk", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "deposit_concentration_risk"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "deposit_concentration_risk", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P085-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "SSD authoritative adjudication: If the funding is internally generated with no depositor-to-bank boundary, the exact deposit-base concentration structure is absent."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "An open-source producer may lack a formal contract with the deployer, but the exact candidate still requires distinct upstream production and downstream voluntary import roles, preserving institutional separation.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "AI Supply-Chain Attack", "one_liner": "The compromise of an upstream AI-pipeline component — training data, weights, packages, eval sets — by an adversary who exploits the deployer's trust in the producer's channel rather than breaching the perimeter, so the poisoned artefact is imported voluntarily.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:ai_supply_chain_attack", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "ai_supply_chain_attack"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "ai_supply_chain_attack", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P085-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "SSD authoritative adjudication: If the same actor produces and deploys the component with no producer-channel trust boundary, the exact supply-chain attack mechanism is absent."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Both paths may execute inside one organization, but normal and exception channels remain logically separate routing destinations, which is sufficient for the logical-separation branch.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Exception Management", "one_liner": "Run high-volume normal items on a streamlined standard path and deliberately divert off-plan items onto a separate specialist channel, while feeding the diversion rate back upstream to fix the normal flow when it climbs.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:exception_management", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "exception_management"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "exception_management", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P085-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "SSD authoritative adjudication: If items do not enter a routed flow and no separate specialist destination exists, the exact normal-path versus exception-path mechanism is absent."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "The same reservoir can source one flux and sink another, but the roles remain logically distinct per directed edge; O5 requires logical rather than permanent physical separation, so the branch survives.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Biogeochemical Cycling", "one_liner": "Model the circulation of a conserved Earth-system element through compartmental reservoirs — each with a stock and residence time — linked by canonical transformations and governed by a rate-limiting bottleneck, with mass balance forced to close.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:biogeochemical_cycling", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "biogeochemical_cycling"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "biogeochemical_cycling", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P085-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "SSD authoritative adjudication: If inputs, outputs, and receiving reservoirs cannot be distinguished as directed accounting roles, the exact record's mass balance cannot close and the candidate ceases to be a biogeochemical cycle."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Pro-social arrivals may be valuable individually, but the exact record requires their aggregate inflow to exceed the command sink's throughput, so the source-capacity imbalance remains.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Convergence Failure", "one_liner": "The disaster-management pathology in which uncoordinated pro-social inflows — volunteers, donations, inquiries — arrive faster than incident command can absorb, consuming the same coordination bandwidth the primary hazard needs and triggering a second disaster.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:convergence_failure", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "convergence_failure"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "convergence_failure", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P085-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "SSD authoritative adjudication: If arrival rate stays within registration and routing capacity, the exact convergence failure does not occur; overload is necessary to the candidate."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "No node is a permanent source or sink in steady state, but O1 requires source and sink roles rather than permanent node identities; injections and leakages remain logically distinct roles, so the branch holds.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Circular Flow", "one_liner": "Represent the whole economy as two loops running opposite ways between households and firms, then track every off-loop flow as a leakage or an injection whose sums must balance when the loop closes in steady state.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:circular_flow", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "circular_flow"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "circular_flow", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P085-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "SSD authoritative adjudication: If origins, destinations, injections, and leakages cannot be separately labeled, the exact candidate loses the named-edge accounting topology that defines circular flow."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Some individual cases may be captured, but the complete failure requires systematic attenuation across the pipeline, leaving the source population larger than the recorded sink and preserving imbalance.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Outbreak Underascertainment", "one_liner": "The surveillance failure in which recorded case counts fall systematically below the true count because a multi-stage detection pipeline — symptom expression, care-seeking, testing, confirmation, reporting — filters cases with biased attenuation at each layer.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:outbreak_underascertainment", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "outbreak_underascertainment"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "outbreak_underascertainment", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P085-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "SSD authoritative adjudication: If every true case passes through symptom, care, testing, confirmation, and reporting without loss, recorded and true counts coincide and the exact candidate is absent."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A return completed at one retail site may minimize geographic distance, but it still moves from the consumer-origin role into a logically distinct receiving, inspection, and routing sink, so the logical-separation branch holds.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Returns Friction", "one_liner": "Diagnose why returns, recalls, and repairs move badly: the reverse flow is an irregular trickle of heterogeneous, quality-uncertain units forced through a network designed and optimized for one-directional forward flow, sharing its rails as an afterthought.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:returns_friction", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "returns_friction"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "returns_friction", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P085-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "SSD authoritative adjudication: If returned units have no distinct origin and receiving or onward-routing destination, no reverse flow exists and the candidate's source-to-consumer versus consumer-to-source asymmetry disappears."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Equal supplier shares were tested, but they eliminate the concentration condition and therefore the candidate.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Supplier Concentration Risk", "one_liner": "Exposure that arises when a buyer's dependency for a critical input rests on so few suppliers that one node's disruption propagates downstream faster than alternatives can be qualified — a shape property of the dependency distribution, not of any supplier's performance.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:supplier_concentration_risk", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "supplier_concentration_risk"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "supplier_concentration_risk", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P085-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "SSD authoritative adjudication: Supplier concentration necessarily describes a flow network whose sourced volume is disproportionately supplied by one or a few sources relative to the receiving buyer."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A compact karst feature may shorten the path, but input and outlet remain spatially distinct endpoints connected through the conduit network, satisfying geographic separation.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Karst", "one_liner": "Diagnose a landscape where acidic groundwater has dissolved soluble bedrock into a self-reinforcing hidden conduit network, so the surface no longer maps the subsurface drainage and porous-media terrain rules are suspended.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:karst", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "karst"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "karst", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P085-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "SSD authoritative adjudication: If recharge and discharge coincide with no conduit path across terrain, the exact hidden drainage network and its surface-subsurface mismatch are absent."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "I tested a closed cell whose total sources equal total sinks; it falls outside the nonzero-balance guard. With a nonzero budget, the exact mass-balance ledger necessarily has unequal source and sink totals.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Sediment Budget", "one_liner": "Account for sediment as a mass-balance ledger of sources and sinks over a bounded coastal or fluvial cell, so the running balance — not the last storm — tells whether the shoreline is accreting, stable, or eroding.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:sediment_budget", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2"], "guard_type": "THRESHOLD_CROSSING", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "sediment_budget_balance_nonzero", "predicate": "The sediment budget's running balance is nonzero.", "rationale": "The exact-record mapping satisfies one complete DNF branch, preserves typed roles and direction, and the single qualifier is anchored, atomic, and sufficient."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "sediment_budget"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The sediment budget's running balance is nonzero."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "sediment_budget", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P085-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "SSD authoritative adjudication: A perfectly balanced sediment budget preserves the DSA but falsifies O2, so direct classification fails. The one scalar guard excludes only that native balance state and entails source-sink imbalance."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Sources and sinks are imbalanced or separated across the network.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P085-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a constrained network and an initial bottleneck location.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A flow network has a bottleneck at one link or location.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail actual alleviation of the first constraint.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The initial bottleneck is relieved.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve causal migration rather than an unrelated second bottleneck.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Relieving the initial bottleneck causes another location to become the bottleneck.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the before-after ordering of constraint migration.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The new bottleneck emerges after relief of the initial one.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "Relieving one link's bottleneck causes the flow bottleneck to migrate to another location.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "bottleneck relief causes constraint migration elsewhere in the network", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P085-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A bottleneck can remain fixed after intervention or disappear without migration.", "slug": "bottleneck"}], "residual_id": "r:network_flow_optimization:b043_a09_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b043_a09_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Bottlenecks migrate when one link is relieved. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Bottlenecks migrate when one link is relieved."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A bottleneck can remain fixed after intervention or disappear without migration.", "slug": "bottleneck"}], "normalized_requirement": "Relieving one bottleneck causes the bottleneck to migrate elsewhere.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Relieving one bottleneck causes the bottleneck to migrate elsewhere.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The method optimizes a declared flow objective, including maximum throughput or minimum cost.", "role_mapping": "Objective -> flow criterion; routing -> edge-flow solution.", "slug": "network_flow_models", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b043_a09_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The objective is throughput, cost, reliability, fairness, latency, loss reduction, or some explicit combination of these. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The objective is throughput, cost, reliability, fairness, latency, loss reduction, or some explicit combination of these."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Network Flow Models", "one_liner": "Optimize flow across networks.", "page_ref": "prime:network_flow_models", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Objective -> flow criterion; routing -> edge-flow solution.", "slug": "network_flow_models", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The method optimizes a declared flow objective, including maximum throughput or minimum cost."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Routing is judged by an explicit objective such as throughput, cost, reliability, fairness, latency, or loss.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 43, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-043", "ledger_sha256": "24251df91d9f53e683ffbeb3d833389b3743f7ba7b4512b1bf3ed55c25bc7b42"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Network Motif and Pattern Discovery", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:network_motif_and_pattern_discovery", "slug": "network_motif_and_pattern_discovery"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 2, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A network contains recurring local relational structures, but those structures are hidden inside the mass of edges, confused with chance frequency, or interpreted without regard to the graph assumptions that produced them.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A network contains recurring local relational structures, but those structures are hidden inside the mass of edges, confused with chance frequency, or interpreted without regard to the graph assumptions that produced them."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A network necessarily consists of identifiable nodes and edges whose connection pattern is the object of analysis.", "role_mapping": "Entities -> nodes; relations -> edges; relation attributes -> edge types and weights.", "slug": "network", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b043_a10_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A problem is naturally represented as nodes connected by typed, directed, weighted, temporal, or untyped relations. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A problem is naturally represented as nodes connected by typed, directed, weighted, temporal, or untyped relations."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Network", "one_liner": "Models interactions between components.", "page_ref": "prime:network", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Entities -> nodes; relations -> edges; relation attributes -> edge types and weights.", "slug": "network", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A network necessarily consists of identifiable nodes and edges whose connection pattern is the object of analysis."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The problem is represented as entities connected by typed, directed, weighted, temporal, or untyped relations.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P085-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a bounded local graph structure rather than only a global summary.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A graph contains a small local configuration of nodes and relations.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve apparent or perceived recurrence rather than requiring verified repeated occurrence.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The same configuration appears or seems to occur repeatedly.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires apparent within-network recurrence without strengthening it to verified recurrence.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The configuration appears to recur at multiple locations within one network.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires apparent cross-network recurrence under a comparability relation without strengthening it to verified recurrence.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The configuration appears to recur across comparable networks.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Small local graph configurations seem to recur within one network or across comparable networks.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "small local graph configurations appear recurrent within or across networks", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P085-C13-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Recurrence can be temporal or dynamical and need not involve graph substructures.", "slug": "recurrence"}], "residual_id": "r:network_motif_and_pattern_discovery:b043_a10_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b043_a10_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Small local configurations seem to recur across the network or across comparable networks. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Small local configurations seem to recur across the network or across comparable networks."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Faces instantiate configural processing without graphs, defeating DIRECT; sampled graph neighborhoods preserve the same native learned-configuration relation.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Configural Processing", "one_liner": "A perceiver recognizes an over-learned whole through relations among its parts and feeds that whole-level representation back onto part processing, so canonical arrangement improves constituent recognition and exposes relational violations that isolated features miss.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:configural_processing", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1", "O4"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "stimuli_are_neighborhoods_across_comparable_networks", "predicate": "the over-learned relational stimuli are local neighborhoods sampled across comparable networks", "rationale": "The exact-record mapping satisfies one complete DNF branch, preserves typed roles and direction, and the single qualifier is anchored, atomic, and sufficient."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "configural_processing"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "stimuli_are_neighborhoods_across_comparable_networks"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "configural_processing", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P085-C13-U1", "why_it_fits": "SSD authoritative adjudication: The recurrence-and-relations spine is native, but not every learned configuration comes from graphs; one domain restriction to local neighborhoods across comparable networks fills the graph and across-network branch together."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Small local graph configurations recur within or across networks.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P085-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a network-behavior role and a global-summary role.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A network has observed behavior and one or more global summary metrics.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail an explanatory granularity mismatch, not merely imperfect numerical accuracy.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The global metrics are coarser than the relational structure needed for explanation.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve explanatory insufficiency.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The global summaries do not adequately explain the observed behavior.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Global network-summary metrics are too coarse to explain observed behavior.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "global network summaries lack the granularity needed to explain behavior", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P085-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A network can be fully characterized for a task by global metrics.", "slug": "network"}], "residual_id": "r:network_motif_and_pattern_discovery:b043_a10_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b043_a10_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Global metrics such as average degree, density, or centrality are too coarse to explain observed behavior. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Global metrics such as average degree, density, or centrality are too coarse to explain observed behavior."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Ordinary bivariate observations instantiate the quartet without a network, defeating DIRECT; applying the same summary analysis to network observations leaves the loss relation unchanged.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Anscombe's Quartet", "one_liner": "Four hand-built bivariate datasets that share nearly identical low-order summary statistics yet have radically different scatter geometries, demonstrating that summaries are lossy projections and that one must visualize before granting any parametric summary authority over the data.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:anscombes_quartet", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "summary_analysis_concerns_network_behavior", "predicate": "the summary-analysis instance concerns observed network behavior and global network metrics", "rationale": "The exact-record mapping satisfies one complete DNF branch, preserves typed roles and direction, and the single qualifier is anchored, atomic, and sufficient."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "anscombes_quartet"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "summary_analysis_concerns_network_behavior"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "anscombes_quartet", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P085-C14-U1", "why_it_fits": "SSD authoritative adjudication: The summary-loss relation is exact, but the candidate is not inherently about networks; one domain restriction to network observations and global network summaries fills that ambient type."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Global degree, density, or centrality summaries are too coarse to explain behavior.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P085-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve observers, network data, and local configuration roles.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Practitioners observe local relational configurations in one or more networks.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve perceived recurrence rather than one isolated form.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The configurations appear repeatedly.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve absence of a method for testing the observed repetition.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Practitioners lack a disciplined baseline or significance test for the recurrence.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Practitioners observe repeated local relational configurations but lack a disciplined way to test whether the recurrence is meaningful.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "observed recurring local graph forms lack a disciplined baseline test", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P085-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A cycle is one graph structure and does not entail recurrence, practitioners, or absent baseline testing.", "slug": "cycle"}], "residual_id": "r:network_motif_and_pattern_discovery:b043_a10_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b043_a10_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Practitioners see repeated dependency loops, triads, feedback structures, brokerage forms, or path fragments but lack a disciplined way to test them. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Practitioners see repeated dependency loops, triads, feedback structures, brokerage forms, or path fragments but lack a disciplined way to test them."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A cycle is one graph structure and does not entail recurrence, practitioners, or absent baseline testing.", "slug": "cycle"}], "normalized_requirement": "Practitioners observe repeated loops, triads, brokerage forms, or path fragments without a baseline test.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Practitioners observe repeated loops, triads, brokerage forms, or path fragments without a baseline test.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Several networks need comparison by structural fingerprint, not by node identity.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: Several networks need comparison by structural fingerprint, not by node identity. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Several networks need comparison by structural fingerprint, not by node identity."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Several networks need comparison by structural fingerprint, not by node identity."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 43, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-043", "ledger_sha256": "24251df91d9f53e683ffbeb3d833389b3743f7ba7b4512b1bf3ed55c25bc7b42"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Noise-Bounded Measurement Interpretation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:noise_bounded_measurement_interpretation", "slug": "noise_bounded_measurement_interpretation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The system treats recorded measurements as if they were direct, precise states of the world. Instrument limits, observer variation, background noise, sampling noise, calibration drift, resolution limits, and context effects are invisible or stored separately from the claim being made. As a result, tiny differences are overinterpreted, thresholds trigger on noise, aggregated metrics acquire false precision, and downstream decisions inherit unwarranted certainty.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "The system treats recorded measurements as if they were direct, precise states of the world. Instrument limits, observer variation, background noise, sampling noise, calibration drift, resolution limits, and context effects are invisible or stored separately from the claim being made. As a result, tiny differences are overinterpreted, thresholds trigger on noise, aggregated metrics acquire false precision, and downstream decisions inherit unwarranted certainty."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The apparatus is the only access to true state, so inference proceeds from noisy observed state.", "role_mapping": "Reading -> observed state; underlying quantity -> true state; evidence -> measurement inference.", "slug": "measurement_uncertainty", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b043_a11_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: An observation, score, sensor reading, inspection result, survey response, model output, diagnostic result, or dashboard metric is used as evidence about an underlying state or quantity. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["An observation, score, sensor reading, inspection result, survey response, model output, diagnostic result, or dashboard metric is used as evidence about an underlying state or quantity."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Measurement Uncertainty and Observational Noise", "one_liner": "Measurement noise arises from instrument and observation limits.", "page_ref": "prime:measurement_uncertainty", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Reading -> observed state; underlying quantity -> true state; evidence -> measurement inference.", "slug": "measurement_uncertainty", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The apparatus is the only access to true state, so inference proceeds from noisy observed state."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "An observed score or reading is used as evidence about an underlying state not accessed directly.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Instrument precision, observer bias, environmental noise, sampling, and drift are constitutive noise sources.", "role_mapping": "Channel limits -> measurement apparatus; error -> deviation.", "slug": "measurement_uncertainty", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b043_a11_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The measurement channel has known or plausible instrument limits, rater variability, noise floor, sampling error, background noise, missingness, resolution constraints, or calibration drift. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The measurement channel has known or plausible instrument limits, rater variability, noise floor, sampling error, background noise, missingness, resolution constraints, or calibration drift."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Measurement Uncertainty and Observational Noise", "one_liner": "Measurement noise arises from instrument and observation limits.", "page_ref": "prime:measurement_uncertainty", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Channel limits -> measurement apparatus; error -> deviation.", "slug": "measurement_uncertainty", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Instrument precision, observer bias, environmental noise, sampling, and drift are constitutive noise sources."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Instrument, observer, sampling, resolution, missingness, environment, or calibration limits introduce plausible error.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Observed values vary around latent state because apparatus and observation noise corrupt the signal.", "role_mapping": "Small apparent difference -> measurement deviation; underlying state -> true value.", "slug": "measurement_uncertainty", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b043_a11_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Small differences, rankings, anomalies, pass/fail calls, trend changes, or status shifts could be produced by ordinary measurement variation. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Small differences, rankings, anomalies, pass/fail calls, trend changes, or status shifts could be produced by ordinary measurement variation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Measurement Uncertainty and Observational Noise", "one_liner": "Measurement noise arises from instrument and observation limits.", "page_ref": "prime:measurement_uncertainty", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Small apparent difference -> measurement deviation; underlying state -> true value.", "slug": "measurement_uncertainty", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Observed values vary around latent state because apparatus and observation noise corrupt the signal."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Ordinary measurement variation can produce small differences, rankings, anomalies, threshold calls, or apparent trends.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P086-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a reported measurement and its expressed precision, not merely an unreported precise value.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Reports present measurements with an expressed level of numerical precision.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the observation process as what sets the defensible precision for the reported values.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "An apparatus or observation process provides the relevant evidential basis for those measurements.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail the directional precision excess, not merely uncertainty or a generic measurement limitation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The reports express more precision than that process can defend.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Reports display numerical precision beyond what the observation process supports.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "reported numerical precision exceeds defensible observational precision", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P086-C01-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Uncertainty can be correctly reported with appropriately limited precision.", "slug": "measurement_uncertainty"}], "residual_id": "r:noise_bounded_measurement_interpretation:b043_a11_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b043_a11_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Reports display more precision than the apparatus or observation process can defend. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Reports display more precision than the apparatus or observation process can defend."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Uncertainty can be correctly reported with appropriately limited precision.", "slug": "measurement_uncertainty"}], "normalized_requirement": "Reports show more numerical precision than the observation process supports.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Reports show more numerical precision than the observation process supports.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P086-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O9"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve uncertainty attached to a measurement process or its outputs.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A measurement process has an uncertainty envelope.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail variation in uncertainty across the dimension, not merely the dimension's existence.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The uncertainty envelope changes across values or instances of the selected dimension.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires contextual variation in the measurement uncertainty envelope.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The conditioning dimension is context.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires range-dependent variation in measurement uncertainty.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The conditioning dimension is measurement range.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires load-dependent variation in measurement uncertainty.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The conditioning dimension is load.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires population-dependent variation in measurement uncertainty.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The conditioning dimension is population.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires environment-dependent variation in measurement uncertainty.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The conditioning dimension is environment.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires operator-dependent variation in measurement uncertainty.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The conditioning dimension is operator.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires temporal variation in measurement uncertainty.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "The conditioning dimension is time.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Measurement uncertainty changes with one or more listed operating dimensions.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "measurement uncertainty changes across a listed operating dimension", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P086-C02-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Measurement uncertainty can be stationary and homoscedastic across the operating range.", "slug": "measurement_uncertainty"}], "residual_id": "r:noise_bounded_measurement_interpretation:b043_a11_c7", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b043_a11_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Measurement uncertainty may change with context, range, load, population, environment, operator, or time. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Measurement uncertainty may change with context, range, load, population, environment, operator, or time."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Measurement uncertainty can be stationary and homoscedastic across the operating range.", "slug": "measurement_uncertainty"}], "normalized_requirement": "The uncertainty envelope changes across context, range, load, population, environment, operator, or time.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The uncertainty envelope changes across context, range, load, population, environment, operator, or time.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A downstream system compares measurements across time, groups, instruments, sites, cohorts, or thresholds.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "As a result, tiny differences are overinterpreted, thresholds trigger on noise, aggregated metrics acquire false precision, and downstream decisions inherit unwarranted certainty. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: A downstream system compares measurements across time, groups, instruments, sites, cohorts, or thresholds. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A downstream system compares measurements across time, groups, instruments, sites, cohorts, or thresholds.", "As a result, tiny differences are overinterpreted, thresholds trigger on noise, aggregated metrics acquire false precision, and downstream decisions inherit unwarranted certainty."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "A downstream system compares measurements across time, groups, instruments, sites, cohorts, or thresholds."}, {"display_text": "A high-stakes decision depends on whether apparent signal clears the uncertainty envelope.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: A high-stakes decision depends on whether apparent signal clears the uncertainty envelope. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A high-stakes decision depends on whether apparent signal clears the uncertainty envelope."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "A high-stakes decision depends on whether apparent signal clears the uncertainty envelope."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 43, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-043", "ledger_sha256": "24251df91d9f53e683ffbeb3d833389b3743f7ba7b4512b1bf3ed55c25bc7b42"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Non-Destructive Calibration Check", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:non_destructive_calibration_check", "slug": "non_destructive_calibration_check"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 1 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 1}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system, instrument, sample, model, path, or process depends on calibration, but the obvious way to verify calibration would damage the subject, consume the test item, disturb the operating state, or create unacceptable downtime.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system, instrument, sample, model, path, or process depends on calibration, but the obvious way to verify calibration would damage the subject, consume the test item, disturb the operating state, or create unacceptable downtime."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P086-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O9"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O10"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O11"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a calibration-dependent system, instrument, sample, model, path, or process and the selected stressor affecting it.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A calibration-dependent system, instrument, sample, model, path, or process is exposed to the selected stressor.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the possibility of drift without strengthening it to established drift in every case.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Calibration drift is plausible rather than asserted as certain.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the stressor-to-drift-plausibility direction.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The selected stressor is the reason calibration drift is plausible.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires aging as the basis for plausible drift.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The stressor is aging.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires environmental exposure as the basis for plausible drift.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The stressor is environmental exposure.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires wear as the basis for plausible drift.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The stressor is wear.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires load as the basis for plausible drift.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The stressor is load.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires software change as the basis for plausible drift.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The stressor is software change.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires transport as the basis for plausible drift.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "The stressor is transport.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires sensor fouling as the basis for plausible drift.", "obligation_id": "O10", "statement": "The stressor is sensor fouling.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a prior abnormal event as the basis for plausible drift.", "obligation_id": "O11", "statement": "The stressor is a prior abnormal event.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "One listed stressor makes calibration drift plausible.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "listed stressor makes calibration drift plausible", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P086-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Calibration does not entail prior drift or a drift-producing exposure.", "slug": "calibration"}], "residual_id": "r:non_destructive_calibration_check:b043_a12_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b043_a12_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Calibration drift is plausible because of aging, environmental exposure, wear, load, software changes, transport, sensor fouling, or prior abnormal events. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Calibration drift is plausible because of aging, environmental exposure, wear, load, software changes, transport, sensor fouling, or prior abnormal events."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Calibration does not entail prior drift or a drift-producing exposure.", "slug": "calibration"}], "normalized_requirement": "Aging, exposure, wear, load, software change, transport, fouling, or abnormal events make drift plausible.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Aging, exposure, wear, load, software change, transport, fouling, or abnormal events make drift plausible.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A measurement or control output is used for safety, quality, compliance, clinical, scientific, financial, or operational decisions.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: A measurement or control output is used for safety, quality, compliance, clinical, scientific, financial, or operational decisions. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A measurement or control output is used for safety, quality, compliance, clinical, scientific, financial, or operational decisions."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "A measurement or control output is used for safety, quality, compliance, clinical, scientific, financial, or operational decisions."}, {"display_text": "Full laboratory recalibration, destructive testing, teardown, line shutdown, or sample consumption is costly, risky, slow, or unavailable when assurance is needed.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system, instrument, sample, model, path, or process depends on calibration, but the obvious way to verify calibration would damage the subject, consume the test item, disturb the operating state, or create unacceptable downtime. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: Full laboratory recalibration, destructive testing, teardown, line shutdown, or sample consumption is costly, risky, slow, or unavailable when assurance is needed. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Full laboratory recalibration, destructive testing, teardown, line shutdown, or sample consumption is costly, risky, slow, or unavailable when assurance is needed.", "A system, instrument, sample, model, path, or process depends on calibration, but the obvious way to verify calibration would damage the subject, consume the test item, disturb the operating state, or create unacceptable downtime."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Full laboratory recalibration, destructive testing, teardown, line shutdown, or sample consumption is costly, risky, slow, or unavailable when assurance is needed."}, {"display_text": "The system must remain in its real operating configuration for the check to be meaningful.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Strong calibration evidence usually requires an intrusive comparison against a trusted reference, but the system may need to keep operating and the subject of the check may be valuable, fragile, hazardous, sterile, remote, continuously loaded, or consumed by ordinary testing. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: The system must remain in its real operating configuration for the check to be meaningful. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The system must remain in its real operating configuration for the check to be meaningful.", "Strong calibration evidence usually requires an intrusive comparison against a trusted reference, but the system may need to keep operating and the subject of the check may be valuable, fragile, hazardous, sterile, remote, continuously loaded, or consumed by ordinary testing."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The system must remain in its real operating configuration for the check to be meaningful."}, {"display_text": "A portable reference, redundant channel, internal test stimulus, witness artifact, simulator, loopback, or stable reference event can provide bounded independent evidence.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Strong calibration evidence usually requires an intrusive comparison against a trusted reference, but the system may need to keep operating and the subject of the check may be valuable, fragile, hazardous, sterile, remote, continuously loaded, or consumed by ordinary testing. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: A portable reference, redundant channel, internal test stimulus, witness artifact, simulator, loopback, or stable reference event can provide bounded independent evidence. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A portable reference, redundant channel, internal test stimulus, witness artifact, simulator, loopback, or stable reference event can provide bounded independent evidence.", "Strong calibration evidence usually requires an intrusive comparison against a trusted reference, but the system may need to keep operating and the subject of the check may be valuable, fragile, hazardous, sterile, remote, continuously loaded, or consumed by ordinary testing."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "A portable reference, redundant channel, internal test stimulus, witness artifact, simulator, loopback, or stable reference event can provide bounded independent evidence."}, {"display_text": "Operators need a pass, fail, restricted-service, or inconclusive decision rather than a vague health signal.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: Operators need a pass, fail, restricted-service, or inconclusive decision rather than a vague health signal. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Operators need a pass, fail, restricted-service, or inconclusive decision rather than a vague health signal."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Operators need a pass, fail, restricted-service, or inconclusive decision rather than a vague health signal."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 43, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-043", "ledger_sha256": "24251df91d9f53e683ffbeb3d833389b3743f7ba7b4512b1bf3ed55c25bc7b42"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Nonactivating Occupancy Blockade", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:nonactivating_occupancy_blockade", "slug": "nonactivating_occupancy_blockade"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A harmful or premature actor can trigger a response because it can gain access to a specific recognition site, slot, handle, cue, interface, receptor, namespace, or resource position. The system needs the site to remain available as a controlled structure, but uncontrolled occupation by the wrong claimant causes activation, contamination, capture, or irreversible state change.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A harmful or premature actor can trigger a response because it can gain access to a specific recognition site, slot, handle, cue, interface, receptor, namespace, or resource position. The system needs the site to remain available as a controlled structure, but uncontrolled occupation by the wrong claimant causes activation, contamination, capture, or irreversible state change."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The target has a finite recognition site whose ordinary occupant triggers activation.", "role_mapping": "Risky event -> activation; input -> activator; site -> recognition-gated slot.", "slug": "antagonist", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b043_a13_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The risky event begins when an input or actor is accepted by a specific recognition site rather than by broad diffusion alone. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The risky event begins when an input or actor is accepted by a specific recognition site rather than by broad diffusion alone."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Antagonist", "one_liner": "An inert binder occupies a recognition site, denying access without triggering its function.", "page_ref": "prime:antagonist", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Risky event -> activation; input -> activator; site -> recognition-gated slot.", "slug": "antagonist", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The target has a finite recognition site whose ordinary occupant triggers activation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A risky response begins when an activator is accepted by a finite recognition-gated site.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "An inert binder satisfies recognition with a null payload and therefore occupies without activating.", "role_mapping": "Benign substitute -> inert binder; function -> activation payload; occupancy -> recognized fit.", "slug": "antagonist", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b043_a13_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A benign substitute can occupy the site without producing the function that the unwanted activator would produce. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A benign substitute can occupy the site without producing the function that the unwanted activator would produce."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Antagonist", "one_liner": "An inert binder occupies a recognition site, denying access without triggering its function.", "page_ref": "prime:antagonist", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Benign substitute -> inert binder; function -> activation payload; occupancy -> recognized fit.", "slug": "antagonist", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "An inert binder satisfies recognition with a null payload and therefore occupies without activating."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A recognized inert substitute can occupy the site without delivering the activation payload.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Selective recognition and the no-damage invariant exclude the activator while leaving unrelated sites and later function intact.", "role_mapping": "Selectivity -> recognition interface; unrelated sites -> non-targets.", "slug": "antagonist", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b043_a13_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The blocker can be made selective enough that it does not occupy unrelated sites or suppress unrelated functions. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The blocker can be made selective enough that it does not occupy unrelated sites or suppress unrelated functions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Antagonist", "one_liner": "An inert binder occupies a recognition site, denying access without triggering its function.", "page_ref": "prime:antagonist", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Selectivity -> recognition interface; unrelated sites -> non-targets.", "slug": "antagonist", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Selective recognition and the no-damage invariant exclude the activator while leaving unrelated sites and later function intact."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The blocker can selectively occupy the target site without suppressing unrelated functions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A competitive antagonist can arrive later and displace or outcompete an activator.", "slug": "antagonist"}], "residual_id": "r:nonactivating_occupancy_blockade:b043_a13_c5", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b043_a13_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Timing matters: the blocker must be present before the harmful activator arrives or before the activation window opens. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Timing matters: the blocker must be present before the harmful activator arrives or before the activation window opens."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A competitive antagonist can arrive later and displace or outcompete an activator.", "slug": "antagonist"}], "normalized_requirement": "The blocker must arrive before the activator or activation window.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The blocker must arrive before the activator or activation window.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The site cannot simply be removed because it also supports legitimate future function, controlled activation, identity, continuity, or interoperability.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The site must remain recognizable enough to support controlled function, but recognition itself creates a vulnerability. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: The site cannot simply be removed because it also supports legitimate future function, controlled activation, identity, continuity, or interoperability. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The site cannot simply be removed because it also supports legitimate future function, controlled activation, identity, continuity, or interoperability.", "The site must remain recognizable enough to support controlled function, but recognition itself creates a vulnerability."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "The site cannot simply be removed because it also supports legitimate future function, controlled activation, identity, continuity, or interoperability."}, {"display_text": "The system can observe occupancy, displacement, expiration, or failure well enough to maintain the blockade.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: The system can observe occupancy, displacement, expiration, or failure well enough to maintain the blockade. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The system can observe occupancy, displacement, expiration, or failure well enough to maintain the blockade."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The system can observe occupancy, displacement, expiration, or failure well enough to maintain the blockade."}, {"display_text": "Legitimate activation is still needed sometimes, so the blockade must have release, override, dose, scope, or exception rules.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: Legitimate activation is still needed sometimes, so the blockade must have release, override, dose, scope, or exception rules. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Legitimate activation is still needed sometimes, so the blockade must have release, override, dose, scope, or exception rules."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "Legitimate activation is still needed sometimes, so the blockade must have release, override, dose, scope, or exception rules."}, {"display_text": "A late-stage response after activation would be costly, unsafe, irreversible, or politically difficult compared with pre-activation occupancy.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The system needs the site to remain available as a controlled structure, but uncontrolled occupation by the wrong claimant causes activation, contamination, capture, or irreversible state change. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: A late-stage response after activation would be costly, unsafe, irreversible, or politically difficult compared with pre-activation occupancy. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A late-stage response after activation would be costly, unsafe, irreversible, or politically difficult compared with pre-activation occupancy.", "The system needs the site to remain available as a controlled structure, but uncontrolled occupation by the wrong claimant causes activation, contamination, capture, or irreversible state change."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 8, "text": "A late-stage response after activation would be costly, unsafe, irreversible, or politically difficult compared with pre-activation occupancy."}, {"display_text": "The protected site is attractive, scarce, contested, spoofable, saturable, or vulnerable to race conditions.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The protected site is attractive, scarce, contested, spoofable, saturable, or vulnerable to race conditions. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [9], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The protected site is attractive, scarce, contested, spoofable, saturable, or vulnerable to race conditions."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 9, "text": "The protected site is attractive, scarce, contested, spoofable, saturable, or vulnerable to race conditions."}, {"display_text": "A passive or low-action intervention is preferable to continuous active policing because the site itself can enforce exclusion while occupied.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: A passive or low-action intervention is preferable to continuous active policing because the site itself can enforce exclusion while occupied. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [10], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A passive or low-action intervention is preferable to continuous active policing because the site itself can enforce exclusion while occupied."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 10, "text": "A passive or low-action intervention is preferable to continuous active policing because the site itself can enforce exclusion while occupied."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 43, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-043", "ledger_sha256": "24251df91d9f53e683ffbeb3d833389b3743f7ba7b4512b1bf3ed55c25bc7b42"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Nonlinear Threshold Response", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:nonlinear_threshold_response", "slug": "nonlinear_threshold_response"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a mismatch between the assumed response model and the real system behavior. People act as though each additional unit of input is roughly like the last, but the system has regions where the consequence curve steepens, saturates, flips, cascades, or changes state.\n\nThat mismatch produces predictable failure. A team may add resources linearly while a queue approaches collapse. A platform may keep monitoring normally while error propagation becomes self-amplifying. A public-health group may wait for large absolute case numbers even though transmission growth is already in a dangerous band. A policy may use a cliff-like cutoff without recognizing measurement uncertainty or unequal baseline conditions.\n\nThe problem is not only technical. It is also coordinative. Without explicit thresholds and regime rules, stakeholders argue over whether the situation is “really serious yet.” The archetype converts that ambiguity into shared trigger conditions and response expectations.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system is being handled as if response should scale smoothly and proportionally, but the system's actual behavior changes sharply near thresholds, tipping points, saturation boundaries, phase changes, or critical risk bands. Below one boundary, light monitoring may be enough; near or beyond it, delay or incrementalism can permit runaway harm, collapse, contagion, overload, or irreversible transition."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A threshold can have a gradual transition and need not produce an outsized consequence.", "slug": "threshold"}], "residual_id": "r:nonlinear_threshold_response:b043_a14_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b043_a14_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Evidence suggests that small changes near a boundary produce outsized consequences. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Evidence suggests that small changes near a boundary produce outsized consequences."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A threshold can have a gradual transition and need not produce an outsized consequence.", "slug": "threshold"}], "normalized_requirement": "Small input changes near a boundary can produce outsized consequences.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Small input changes near a boundary can produce outsized consequences.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P086-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a proportional response policy rather than any weak response.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A system uses a response that scales proportionally with its input or deviation.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve proximity to crisis or a critical region as the operating domain.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The response is evaluated before or near crisis conditions.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail underreaction relative to what the near-crisis condition requires.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The proportional response is too weak for those conditions.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve recurrence rather than a single underresponse.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The underreaction occurs repeatedly.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}], "predicate": "A proportional response repeatedly underreacts before crises.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "proportional response repeatedly underreacts near crisis", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P086-C04-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P086-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a proportional response policy rather than any strong response.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A system uses a response that scales proportionally with its input or deviation.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the noncritical operating domain.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The response is evaluated away from crisis or critical regions.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail overreaction relative to what the noncritical condition requires.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The proportional response is stronger than those conditions warrant.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve recurrence rather than a single overresponse.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The overreaction occurs repeatedly.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}], "predicate": "A proportional response repeatedly overreacts away from critical regions.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "proportional response repeatedly overreacts outside critical regions", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P086-C04-U2"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A threshold does not entail an existing proportional response or its repeated failure.", "slug": "threshold"}], "residual_id": "r:nonlinear_threshold_response:b043_a14_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b043_a14_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A proportional response repeatedly underreacts before crises and overreacts away from critical regions. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A proportional response repeatedly underreacts before crises and overreacts away from critical regions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 2, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 2}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A threshold does not entail an existing proportional response or its repeated failure.", "slug": "threshold"}], "normalized_requirement": "A proportional response underreacts near crisis and overreacts away from critical regions.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 2 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A proportional response underreacts near crisis and overreacts away from critical regions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Below-, transition-, and above-threshold regimes are defined by the critical input value.", "role_mapping": "Operating regimes -> below and above threshold; boundary -> x_c.", "slug": "threshold", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b043_a14_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The system has identifiable regimes such as normal, watch, alert, crisis, recovery, or saturated operation. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The system has identifiable regimes such as normal, watch, alert, crisis, recovery, or saturated operation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Threshold", "one_liner": "Safe vs harmful levels.", "page_ref": "prime:threshold", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Operating regimes -> below and above threshold; boundary -> x_c.", "slug": "threshold", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Below-, transition-, and above-threshold regimes are defined by the critical input value."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The system has distinguishable operating regimes separated by one or more response thresholds.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A carrying capacity can be far from current load and need not be approached.", "slug": "carrying_capacity"}], "residual_id": "r:nonlinear_threshold_response:b043_a14_c4", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b043_a14_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A target variable approaches a capacity, dose, safety, fairness, financial, ecological, or reliability threshold. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A target variable approaches a capacity, dose, safety, fairness, financial, ecological, or reliability threshold."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A carrying capacity can be far from current load and need not be approached.", "slug": "carrying_capacity"}], "normalized_requirement": "A target variable is approaching a consequential capacity, dose, safety, fairness, financial, ecological, or reliability boundary.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A target variable is approaching a consequential capacity, dose, safety, fairness, financial, ecological, or reliability boundary.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P086-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve procedures with a governing role in the focal response.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Existing procedures govern a response or operation.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail absence or insufficiency of the transition rule, not a rule that merely performs poorly.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The procedures lack a clear rule specifying when change should occur.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires authority as the response dimension lacking a clear transition rule.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The missing rule concerns when authority should change.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires resources as the response dimension lacking a clear transition rule.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The missing rule concerns when resources should change.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires methods as the response dimension lacking a clear transition rule.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The missing rule concerns when methods should change.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Existing procedures do not clearly specify when one listed response dimension should change.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "procedures lack clear change rules for a listed response dimension", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P086-C05-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Nonlinearity does not entail an organizational procedure or missing authority rule.", "slug": "nonlinearity"}], "residual_id": "r:nonlinear_threshold_response:b043_a14_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b043_a14_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Existing procedures lack clear rules for when authority, resources, or methods should change. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Existing procedures lack clear rules for when authority, resources, or methods should change."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "An instance limited to an underspecified use-of-force threshold would preserve the DSA but not the authority branch; the branch-selection guard excludes exactly that counterexample.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Rules-of-Engagement Ambiguity", "one_liner": "Diagnose frontline breakdown under time pressure as a grain mismatch — decision rules written coarser than the environment generates choice points — paid out of a finite discretion budget, relocating the fix from the operator's judgment to the rule, escalation path, and pre-positioned authority.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:rules_of_engagement_ambiguity", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O3"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "underspecified_rule_concerns_authority_change", "predicate": "The underspecified decision rule concerns when operational decision authority should change.", "rationale": "The exact record preserves the principal roles, directed relation, and a complete DNF branch; any retained qualifier is single, candidate-anchored, and non-laundering."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "rules_of_engagement_ambiguity"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "underspecified_rule_concerns_authority_change"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "rules_of_engagement_ambiguity", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P086-C05-U1", "why_it_fits": "The DSA directly supplies the governing-rule and insufficiency spine; one candidate-anchored branch selector is necessary and sufficient to bind the ambiguity to authority change."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Procedures lack explicit rules for when authority, resources, or methods should change.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The cost of late action is much higher than the cost of bounded early escalation.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The cost of late action is much higher than the cost of bounded early escalation. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The cost of late action is much higher than the cost of bounded early escalation."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The cost of late action is much higher than the cost of bounded early escalation."}, {"display_text": "Stakeholders disagree because one side sees a small numerical change while another sees a regime boundary.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Without explicit thresholds and regime rules, stakeholders argue over whether the situation is “really serious yet.” The archetype converts that ambiguity into shared trigger conditions and response expectations. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Stakeholders disagree because one side sees a small numerical change while another sees a regime boundary. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders disagree because one side sees a small numerical change while another sees a regime boundary.", "Without explicit thresholds and regime rules, stakeholders argue over whether the situation is “really serious yet.” The archetype converts that ambiguity into shared trigger conditions and response expectations."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "Stakeholders disagree because one side sees a small numerical change while another sees a regime boundary."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 43, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-043", "ledger_sha256": "24251df91d9f53e683ffbeb3d833389b3743f7ba7b4512b1bf3ed55c25bc7b42"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Nonlocal Coupling Governance", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:nonlocal_coupling_governance", "slug": "nonlocal_coupling_governance"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 5, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system is modeled, monitored, or governed as if influence travels only through adjacent elements, contiguous paths, or local neighborhoods, but important states co-move or affect one another across distance, hierarchy, ownership, medium, or topology. The local model therefore misses constraints, risks, opportunities, or side effects that appear to arrive from nowhere.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system is modeled, monitored, or governed as if influence travels only through adjacent elements, contiguous paths, or local neighborhoods, but important states co-move or affect one another across distance, hierarchy, ownership, medium, or topology. The local model therefore misses constraints, risks, opportunities, or side effects that appear to arrive from nowhere."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Distant elements couple without an adjacency-respecting propagation path.", "role_mapping": "Distant entities -> nonadjacent elements; no obvious chain -> absent contiguous carrier.", "slug": "non_locality", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "Separated regions show persistent statistical linkage through shared remote dynamics rather than direct local interaction.", "role_mapping": "Persistent correlation -> co-variation; distant entities -> separated regions.", "slug": "teleconnection", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b043_a15_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Distant entities display persistent correlation, synchronization, contagion, constraint, or coordinated state change without an obvious chain of local contact. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Distant entities display persistent correlation, synchronization, contagion, constraint, or coordinated state change without an obvious chain of local contact."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Non-Locality", "one_liner": "Distant elements influence or correlate with each other without a chain of contiguous intervening contact — coupling that jumps the substrate rather than propagating through neighbors.", "page_ref": "prime:non_locality", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Distant entities -> nonadjacent elements; no obvious chain -> absent contiguous carrier.", "slug": "non_locality", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Distant elements couple without an adjacency-respecting propagation path."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Teleconnection", "one_liner": "Distant relationships via shared dynamics.", "page_ref": "prime:teleconnection", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Persistent correlation -> co-variation; distant entities -> separated regions.", "slug": "teleconnection", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Separated regions show persistent statistical linkage through shared remote dynamics rather than direct local interaction."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Distant entities persistently correlate or coordinate without a contiguous local-contact chain.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Non-adjacent coupling makes regional decomposition fail, so a local change can have remote effects without a local chain.", "role_mapping": "Local intervention -> change at one element; remote consequence -> coupled distant element.", "slug": "non_locality", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b043_a15_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A local intervention produces remote consequences that are not explained by the visible neighborhood map. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A local intervention produces remote consequences that are not explained by the visible neighborhood map."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Non-Locality", "one_liner": "Distant elements influence or correlate with each other without a chain of contiguous intervening contact — coupling that jumps the substrate rather than propagating through neighbors.", "page_ref": "prime:non_locality", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Local intervention -> change at one element; remote consequence -> coupled distant element.", "slug": "non_locality", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Non-adjacent coupling makes regional decomposition fail, so a local change can have remote effects without a local chain."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A local intervention produces remote consequences not predicted by the visible neighborhood map.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Persistent lead-lag or co-variation links separated regions through shared dynamics.", "role_mapping": "Remote event -> distant region signal; local change -> linked response.", "slug": "teleconnection", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b043_a15_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Remote events repeatedly change local risk, capacity, meaning, access, or performance despite apparent separation. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Remote events repeatedly change local risk, capacity, meaning, access, or performance despite apparent separation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Teleconnection", "one_liner": "Distant relationships via shared dynamics.", "page_ref": "prime:teleconnection", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Remote event -> distant region signal; local change -> linked response.", "slug": "teleconnection", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Persistent lead-lag or co-variation links separated regions through shared dynamics."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Remote events repeatedly alter local risk, capacity, access, meaning, or performance despite apparent separation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A coupling links nonadjacent elements without a contiguous intervening carrier, defeating local decomposition.", "role_mapping": "Hidden substrate or constraint -> nonlocal coupling; distant elements -> nonadjacent pair.", "slug": "non_locality", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b043_a15_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The system has hidden shared substrate, common factors, entanglement-like coupling, global constraints, broadcast channels, side channels, or platform-mediated ties. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The system has hidden shared substrate, common factors, entanglement-like coupling, global constraints, broadcast channels, side channels, or platform-mediated ties."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Non-Locality", "one_liner": "Distant elements influence or correlate with each other without a chain of contiguous intervening contact — coupling that jumps the substrate rather than propagating through neighbors.", "page_ref": "prime:non_locality", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Hidden substrate or constraint -> nonlocal coupling; distant elements -> nonadjacent pair.", "slug": "non_locality", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A coupling links nonadjacent elements without a contiguous intervening carrier, defeating local decomposition."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A hidden shared substrate, common factor, global constraint, broadcast, side channel, or platform tie couples distant elements.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact contrast is with propagation through neighbors; local-path models omit the jumping edge.", "role_mapping": "Path model -> adjacency-respecting propagation; underprediction -> missing nonlocal edge.", "slug": "non_locality", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b043_a15_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Path-based, adjacency-based, or diffusion-based models systematically underpredict remote co-movement. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Path-based, adjacency-based, or diffusion-based models systematically underpredict remote co-movement."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Non-Locality", "one_liner": "Distant elements influence or correlate with each other without a chain of contiguous intervening contact — coupling that jumps the substrate rather than propagating through neighbors.", "page_ref": "prime:non_locality", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Path model -> adjacency-respecting propagation; underprediction -> missing nonlocal edge.", "slug": "non_locality", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact contrast is with propagation through neighbors; local-path models omit the jumping edge."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Adjacency- or diffusion-based models systematically underpredict remote co-movement.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P086-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve one explanation directed at a nonlocal or remote dependency.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A remote dependency has a proposed explanation.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve plausibility without requiring that the explanation is established as complete.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The explanation is plausible.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the gap between explanatory plausibility and complete governance adequacy.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The explanation is insufficient to govern the whole remote dependency.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a proxy explanation of the remote dependency.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The proposed explanation is a proxy explanation.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a teleconnection explanation of the remote dependency.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The proposed explanation is a teleconnection explanation.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a propagation explanation of the remote dependency.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The proposed explanation is a propagation explanation.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "One listed remote-influence explanation is plausible but insufficient to govern the complete remote dependency.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "plausible remote-influence explanation is insufficient for governing the whole dependency", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P086-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A teleconnection can be fully modeled and governed; insufficiency is not constitutive.", "slug": "teleconnection"}], "residual_id": "r:nonlocal_coupling_governance:b043_a15_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b043_a15_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A proxy, teleconnection, or propagation explanation is plausible but not sufficient to govern the whole remote dependency. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A proxy, teleconnection, or propagation explanation is plausible but not sufficient to govern the whole remote dependency."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A teleconnection can be fully modeled and governed; insufficiency is not constitutive.", "slug": "teleconnection"}], "normalized_requirement": "A proxy or teleconnection explanation is plausible but insufficient to govern the complete remote dependency.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A proxy or teleconnection explanation is plausible but insufficient to govern the complete remote dependency.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Stakeholders rely on local independence assumptions that may be false.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Stakeholders rely on local independence assumptions that may be false. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders rely on local independence assumptions that may be false."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "Stakeholders rely on local independence assumptions that may be false."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 43, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-043", "ledger_sha256": "24251df91d9f53e683ffbeb3d833389b3743f7ba7b4512b1bf3ed55c25bc7b42"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Norm Shaping", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:norm_shaping", "slug": "norm_shaping"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 4 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a gap between stated expectations and lived expectations. The organization or group may say one thing, while status signals, peer reactions, leader behavior, convenience, rewards, rituals, and stories teach another.\n\nA typical signature looks like this: the stated value is “quality,” but speed receives praise; the policy says “report risks,” but messengers are blamed; the team says “ask questions,” but questioners are treated as slow; the community says “be respectful,” but high-status members get away with contempt. The current norm survives because it is reinforced somewhere.\n\nThe root tension is not simply individual attitude. It is the mismatch between official intention and the reinforcement structure that makes some behaviors feel normal and others costly.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "People behave according to implicit norms that conflict with stated policy, values, or goals."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A policy is not necessarily the preference report of the same agent whose real choice is observed.", "slug": "stated_revealed_preference_gap"}], "residual_id": "r:norm_shaping:b044_a01_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b044_a01_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Policy exists but behavior does not follow it. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Policy exists but behavior does not follow it"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A policy is not necessarily the preference report of the same agent whose real choice is observed.", "slug": "stated_revealed_preference_gap"}], "normalized_requirement": "A stated policy exists but observed behavior does not follow it.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A stated policy exists but observed behavior does not follow it.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A social norm supplies expectation-backed sanction, but it does not identify which behavior an external intervention desires or require inconvenience.", "slug": "social_norms"}], "residual_id": "r:norm_shaping:b044_a01_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b044_a01_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The desired behavior feels socially risky, inconvenient, or low-status. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The desired behavior feels socially risky, inconvenient, or low-status"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A social norm supplies expectation-backed sanction, but it does not identify which behavior an external intervention desires or require inconvenience.", "slug": "social_norms"}], "normalized_requirement": "The desired behavior carries social, convenience, or status cost.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The desired behavior carries social, convenience, or status cost.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Reported preference can diverge from behavior without a default, and a default can conflict with an institutional priority rather than the chooser's report.", "slug": "stated_revealed_preference_gap"}], "residual_id": "r:norm_shaping:b044_a01_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b044_a01_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Behavioral defaults contradict stated priorities. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Behavioral defaults contradict stated priorities"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Reported preference can diverge from behavior without a default, and a default can conflict with an institutional priority rather than the chooser's report.", "slug": "stated_revealed_preference_gap"}], "normalized_requirement": "Behavioral defaults contradict stated priorities.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Behavioral defaults contradict stated priorities.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P086-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an operative norm rather than a stated policy alone.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A group or system has an operative behavior-guiding norm.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail movement in the norm itself.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The content or practical standard of that norm changes.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve temporal drift rather than one instantaneous replacement.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The change unfolds over time as drift.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "The operative norm drifts over time.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "operative norm changes through temporal drift", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P086-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Stable shared expectations are valid social norms; drift is not mandatory.", "slug": "social_norms"}], "residual_id": "r:norm_shaping:b044_a01_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b044_a01_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Norm drift is occurring. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Norm drift is occurring"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A formally announced one-time rubric revision would change a norm but would fail the candidate's within-rubric gradual-drift boundary.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Annotation Drift", "one_liner": "The gradual, undocumented shift over time in how annotators apply an unchanged rubric, so identical instances get different labels — a silent recalibration of a measurement instrument, invisible to within-slice agreement and detectable only by re-annotating frozen gold.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:annotation_drift", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "annotation_drift"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "annotation_drift", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P086-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "The candidate directly preserves the operative norm, changing practical content, and temporal-drift mechanism required by the sole branch."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The operative norm is drifting over time.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Culture language is abstract and under-specified.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Culture language is abstract and under-specified. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Culture language is abstract and under-specified"]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Culture language is abstract and under-specified"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 44, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-044", "ledger_sha256": "eeb8a602a6457ebc37822f8c1fcd57a1a47508b650091865a1f96f0057c0c8b2"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Normative Assumption Explicitness", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:normative_assumption_explicitness", "slug": "normative_assumption_explicitness"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 3, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 4 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 3 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is false neutrality. A system presents a decision as technical, objective, scientific, efficient, or evidence-based, but the decision depends on unstated assumptions about what should count, what should be optimized, what risks are acceptable, and whose outcomes matter.\n\nHidden normative assumptions create several predictable harms. They prevent affected parties from understanding why a decision was made. They shift value conflict into technical language. They make contestation look irrational because the real ought-claim is never named. They also make later revision difficult because no one knows which value premise the original decision depended on.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A policy, model, metric, design, or decision is framed as objective, technical, natural, inevitable, or merely evidence-based while relying on unstated value judgments about what should count, which outcomes matter, whose interests matter, what risks are acceptable, and which tradeoffs are legitimate."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime can be applied with a fully explicit value bridge and therefore does not require a neutrality presentation.", "slug": "fact_value_distinction"}], "residual_id": "r:normative_assumption_explicitness:b044_a02_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b044_a02_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "They also make later revision difficult because no one knows which value premise the original decision depended on. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A decision is presented as value-neutral.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A decision is presented as value-neutral.", "They also make later revision difficult because no one knows which value premise the original decision depended on."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime can be applied with a fully explicit value bridge and therefore does not require a neutrality presentation.", "slug": "fact_value_distinction"}], "normalized_requirement": "A decision is presented as value-neutral.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A decision is presented as value-neutral.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "An unstated evaluative premise is load-bearing in the ostensibly neutral decision artifact.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "An unstated evaluative premise is load-bearing in the ostensibly neutral decision artifact.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record makes adequacy depend on production of a declared outcome, so the target itself defines success.", "role_mapping": "Metric or target -> defined outcome; success -> adequacy criterion.", "slug": "outcome_defined_adequacy", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b044_a02_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A metric or target defines success. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A metric or target defines success."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Outcome-Defined Adequacy", "one_liner": "Adequacy is specified by whether a defined outcome is produced in context, leaving the form open to any realization that achieves it.", "page_ref": "prime:outcome_defined_adequacy", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Metric or target -> defined outcome; success -> adequacy criterion.", "slug": "outcome_defined_adequacy", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record makes adequacy depend on production of a declared outcome, so the target itself defines success."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A metric or target defines what counts as success.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "An unstated evaluative premise is load-bearing in the ostensibly neutral decision artifact.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "An unstated evaluative premise is load-bearing in the ostensibly neutral decision artifact.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime distinguishes claim roles but does not require stakeholders, disguise, or an existing disagreement.", "slug": "fact_value_distinction"}], "residual_id": "r:normative_assumption_explicitness:b044_a02_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b044_a02_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Stakeholders disagree but the disagreement is disguised as factual or technical. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders disagree but the disagreement is disguised as factual or technical."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime distinguishes claim roles but does not require stakeholders, disguise, or an existing disagreement.", "slug": "fact_value_distinction"}], "normalized_requirement": "Stakeholders' value disagreement is disguised as factual or technical disagreement.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Stakeholders' value disagreement is disguised as factual or technical disagreement.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "An unstated evaluative premise is load-bearing in the ostensibly neutral decision artifact.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "An unstated evaluative premise is load-bearing in the ostensibly neutral decision artifact.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "DISJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A rule affects rights, burdens, eligibility, or opportunity.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when a decision claims neutrality while allocating benefit, burden, risk, opportunity, credibility, attention, or protection. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: A rule affects rights, burdens, eligibility, or opportunity. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A rule affects rights, burdens, eligibility, or opportunity.", "Use this archetype when a decision claims neutrality while allocating benefit, burden, risk, opportunity, credibility, attention, or protection."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "A rule affects rights, burdens, eligibility, or opportunity."}, {"display_text": "A model or process automates prioritization.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when a metric defines success, a model automates prioritization, a policy creates eligibility, or a design choice makes one value easy and another value costly. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: A model or process automates prioritization. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A model or process automates prioritization.", "It is especially useful when a metric defines success, a model automates prioritization, a policy creates eligibility, or a design choice makes one value easy and another value costly."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "A model or process automates prioritization."}, {"display_text": "A governance decision needs public or organizational legitimacy.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: A governance decision needs public or organizational legitimacy. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A governance decision needs public or organizational legitimacy."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "A governance decision needs public or organizational legitimacy."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 44, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-044", "ledger_sha256": "eeb8a602a6457ebc37822f8c1fcd57a1a47508b650091865a1f96f0057c0c8b2"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Normed Encounter Surface Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:normed_encounter_surface_design", "slug": "normed_encounter_surface_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Strangers, roles, or groups need opportunities for contact, but encounters are absent, inaccessible, private, fleeting, or normless, allowing isolation, domination, avoidance, and conflict to persist.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Strangers, roles, or groups need opportunities for contact, but encounters are absent, inaccessible, private, fleeting, or normless, allowing isolation, domination, avoidance, and conflict to persist."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An encounter surface can serve one locality and need not be motivated by cross-case recurrence.", "slug": "encounter_surface"}], "residual_id": "r:normed_encounter_surface_design:b044_a03_c1", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b044_a03_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The target condition recurs across cases or domains rather than appearing as a one-off exception. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The target condition recurs across cases or domains rather than appearing as a one-off exception."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An encounter surface can serve one locality and need not be motivated by cross-case recurrence.", "slug": "encounter_surface"}], "normalized_requirement": "The target condition recurs across cases or domains rather than being a one-off exception.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The target condition recurs across cases or domains rather than being a one-off exception.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime supplies a contact layer but does not require prior local workarounds or a concealed structural relation.", "slug": "encounter_surface"}], "residual_id": "r:normed_encounter_surface_design:b044_a03_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b044_a03_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Local workarounds do not expose the underlying structural relation. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Local workarounds do not expose the underlying structural relation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime supplies a contact layer but does not require prior local workarounds or a concealed structural relation.", "slug": "encounter_surface"}], "normalized_requirement": "Local workarounds do not expose the underlying structural relation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Local workarounds do not expose the underlying structural relation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An enthymeme requires an unstated premise, but it need not be unvalidated or decision-consequential.", "slug": "enthymeme"}], "residual_id": "r:normed_encounter_surface_design:b044_a03_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b044_a03_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Consequential decisions depend on an assumption that is not yet explicit or validated. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Consequential decisions depend on an assumption that is not yet explicit or validated."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An enthymeme requires an unstated premise, but it need not be unvalidated or decision-consequential.", "slug": "enthymeme"}], "normalized_requirement": "A consequential decision depends on an assumption that is neither explicit nor validated.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A consequential decision depends on an assumption that is neither explicit nor validated.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "Strangers or unfamiliar roles lack a durable, accessible, mutually observable, norm-governed encounter layer, and the absence sustains isolation or conflict.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Strangers or unfamiliar roles lack a durable, accessible, mutually observable, norm-governed encounter layer, and the absence sustains isolation or conflict.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The system needs a reusable intervention with monitoring, exception handling, and revision.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: The system needs a reusable intervention with monitoring, exception handling, and revision. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The system needs a reusable intervention with monitoring, exception handling, and revision."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The system needs a reusable intervention with monitoring, exception handling, and revision."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 44, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-044", "ledger_sha256": "eeb8a602a6457ebc37822f8c1fcd57a1a47508b650091865a1f96f0057c0c8b2"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Novelty-Driven Attention Capture", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:novelty_driven_attention_capture", "slug": "novelty_driven_attention_capture"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 3, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 3 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 1 of 3 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A message, signal, element, state change, or concept needs attention, but the audience or operator is habituated to a stable pattern, overloaded by competing cues, or treating the current context as routine; ordinary emphasis is either ignored, drowned out, or normalized as background noise.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A message, signal, element, state change, or concept needs attention, but the audience or operator is habituated to a stable pattern, overloaded by competing cues, or treating the current context as routine; ordinary emphasis is either ignored, drowned out, or normalized as background noise."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Repeated exposure to an inconsequential stimulus necessarily dampens the response until the presentation is skimmed or ignored.", "role_mapping": "Repeated presentation -> stimulus; receiver response -> orienting response; ignoring -> response decrement.", "slug": "habituation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The exact record requires a repeated signal channel to lose its attention-recruiting power and settle into an ignore equilibrium.", "role_mapping": "Presentation -> signal channel; audience -> finite receiver; ignored display -> ignore equilibrium.", "slug": "habituation_to_repeated_signal", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b044_a04_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A repeated layout, rhythm, message genre, workflow, lesson format, or status display has become predictable enough that users skim or ignore it. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A repeated layout, rhythm, message genre, workflow, lesson format, or status display has become predictable enough that users skim or ignore it."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Habituation", "one_liner": "Repeated exposure to a stimulus that proves inconsequential progressively reduces the response to it, with stimulus specificity, recovery after a pause, and restoration by a novel stimulus distinguishing habituation from fatigue or sensory failure.", "page_ref": "prime:habituation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Repeated presentation -> stimulus; receiver response -> orienting response; ignoring -> response decrement.", "slug": "habituation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Repeated exposure to an inconsequential stimulus necessarily dampens the response until the presentation is skimmed or ignored."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Habituation to Repeated Signal", "one_liner": "A signal channel meant to recruit attention to a flagged condition loses its recruiting power as exposure accumulates, through the compounding of receiver habituation and base-rate degradation, until the channel is noisily active but informationally bankrupt.", "page_ref": "prime:habituation_to_repeated_signal", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Presentation -> signal channel; audience -> finite receiver; ignored display -> ignore equilibrium.", "slug": "habituation_to_repeated_signal", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires a repeated signal channel to lose its attention-recruiting power and settle into an ignore equilibrium."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Repeated presentation has become predictable enough that the receiver skims or ignores it.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P086-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the focal element's importance and attention target role.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A focal element is an important target for audience or operator attention.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail insufficient salience, not merely competition among already salient targets.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The target does not naturally stand out.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve contextual non-distinctiveness rather than intrinsic invisibility in every setting.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The lack of salience is relative to the target's surrounding context.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "An important target element does not stand out from its context.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "important target lacks contextual salience", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P086-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A focal-point treatment is a solution state and can make an element stand out rather than entail the prior failure.", "slug": "emphasis_focal_point"}], "residual_id": "r:novelty_driven_attention_capture:b044_a04_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b044_a04_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A target element is important but does not naturally stand out against its context. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A target element is important but does not naturally stand out against its context."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A focal-point treatment is a solution state and can make an element stand out rather than entail the prior failure.", "slug": "emphasis_focal_point"}], "normalized_requirement": "An important target element does not stand out against its context.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "An important target element does not stand out against its context.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A bounded selection pool can be exceeded by tasks or inputs that are not emphasis cues, and it does not require all highlights to lose discrimination.", "slug": "attentional_capacity"}], "residual_id": "r:novelty_driven_attention_capture:b044_a04_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b044_a04_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Existing emphasis methods have become saturated because too many things are highlighted at once. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Existing emphasis methods have become saturated because too many things are highlighted at once."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A bounded selection pool can be exceeded by tasks or inputs that are not emphasis cues, and it does not require all highlights to lose discrimination.", "slug": "attentional_capacity"}], "normalized_requirement": "Simultaneous highlighting has saturated the cue field so emphasis no longer discriminates.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Simultaneous highlighting has saturated the cue field so emphasis no longer discriminates.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "DISJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A decision, warning, transition, concept, or opportunity needs reorientation of attention before interpretation can occur.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A message, signal, element, state change, or concept needs attention, but the audience or operator is habituated to a stable pattern, overloaded by competing cues, or treating the current context as routine; ordinary emphasis is either ignored, drowned out, or normalized as background noise. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: A decision, warning, transition, concept, or opportunity needs reorientation of attention before interpretation can occur. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A decision, warning, transition, concept, or opportunity needs reorientation of attention before interpretation can occur.", "A message, signal, element, state change, or concept needs attention, but the audience or operator is habituated to a stable pattern, overloaded by competing cues, or treating the current context as routine; ordinary emphasis is either ignored, drowned out, or normalized as background noise."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "A decision, warning, transition, concept, or opportunity needs reorientation of attention before interpretation can occur."}, {"display_text": "The design context permits a controlled pattern departure without violating safety, accessibility, consent, or trust.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Attention needs discontinuity to reorient, but too much discontinuity destroys trust, comprehension, accessibility, and the background stability that makes novelty work in the first place. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: The design context permits a controlled pattern departure without violating safety, accessibility, consent, or trust. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The design context permits a controlled pattern departure without violating safety, accessibility, consent, or trust.", "Attention needs discontinuity to reorient, but too much discontinuity destroys trust, comprehension, accessibility, and the background stability that makes novelty work in the first place."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The design context permits a controlled pattern departure without violating safety, accessibility, consent, or trust."}, {"display_text": "The audience can recognize both the baseline pattern and the meaning of the departure.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A message, signal, element, state change, or concept needs attention, but the audience or operator is habituated to a stable pattern, overloaded by competing cues, or treating the current context as routine; ordinary emphasis is either ignored, drowned out, or normalized as background noise. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: The audience can recognize both the baseline pattern and the meaning of the departure. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The audience can recognize both the baseline pattern and the meaning of the departure.", "A message, signal, element, state change, or concept needs attention, but the audience or operator is habituated to a stable pattern, overloaded by competing cues, or treating the current context as routine; ordinary emphasis is either ignored, drowned out, or normalized as background noise."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The audience can recognize both the baseline pattern and the meaning of the departure."}, {"display_text": "The organization needs a repeatable way to use novelty without turning every communication into noise or shock.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: The organization needs a repeatable way to use novelty without turning every communication into noise or shock. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The organization needs a repeatable way to use novelty without turning every communication into noise or shock."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "The organization needs a repeatable way to use novelty without turning every communication into noise or shock."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 44, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-044", "ledger_sha256": "eeb8a602a6457ebc37822f8c1fcd57a1a47508b650091865a1f96f0057c0c8b2"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Null Finding Warrant Calibration", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:null_finding_warrant_calibration", "slug": "null_finding_warrant_calibration"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 2, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 3 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 2 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A person or system observes no trace of a target condition and must decide what that non-observation means. Without a detection-power calibration, the same phrase—nothing was found—can be overread as proof of absence or underread as useless silence, even though its warrant depends on the search design, observation channel, timing, sensitivity, specificity, and coverage.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A person or system observes no trace of a target condition and must decide what that non-observation means. Without a detection-power calibration, the same phrase—nothing was found—can be overread as proof of absence or underread as useless silence, even though its warrant depends on the search design, observation channel, timing, sensitivity, specificity, and coverage."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires a target claim, a directed search apparatus, and a null observation.", "role_mapping": "Target -> claim under search; search or test -> apparatus; no finding -> null observation.", "slug": "absence_of_evidence_vs_evidence_of_absence", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b044_a05_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The output may be a negative diagnostic test, no alert, no observed species, no discovered document, no failure reproduction, no complaint, or no statistically significant result. In this condition set, the requirement is: A directed search or test returns no instance of its target.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A search, test, monitor, sensor, audit, review, interview, survey, or investigation finds no target."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Absence Of Evidence Vs Evidence Of Absence", "one_liner": "A null finding becomes evidence against a claim only in proportion to how likely the search was to detect the claim had it been true.", "page_ref": "prime:absence_of_evidence_vs_evidence_of_absence", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Target -> claim under search; search or test -> apparatus; no finding -> null observation.", "slug": "absence_of_evidence_vs_evidence_of_absence", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires a target claim, a directed search apparatus, and a null observation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A directed search or test returns no instance of its target.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Scope export can be warranted or unwarranted without an imperfect search sensitivity or disputed timing.", "slug": "transferability_overclaim"}], "residual_id": "r:null_finding_warrant_calibration:b044_a05_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b044_a05_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The target may be rare, intermittent, hidden, decayed, small, adversarial, poorly measured, outside the sampled region, or masked by noise. In this condition set, the requirement is: Search sensitivity, scope, or timing is imperfect or contested.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Search sensitivity, scope, or timing is imperfect or contested."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Scope export can be warranted or unwarranted without an imperfect search sensitivity or disputed timing.", "slug": "transferability_overclaim"}], "normalized_requirement": "Search sensitivity, scope, or timing is imperfect or contested.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Search sensitivity, scope, or timing is imperfect or contested.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires a target claim, a directed search apparatus, and a null observation.", "role_mapping": "Target -> claim under search; search or test -> apparatus; no finding -> null observation.", "slug": "absence_of_evidence_vs_evidence_of_absence", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b044_a05_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The output may be a negative diagnostic test, no alert, no observed species, no discovered document, no failure reproduction, no complaint, or no statistically significant result. In this condition set, the requirement is: A directed search or test returns no instance of its target.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A search, test, monitor, sensor, audit, review, interview, survey, or investigation finds no target."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Absence Of Evidence Vs Evidence Of Absence", "one_liner": "A null finding becomes evidence against a claim only in proportion to how likely the search was to detect the claim had it been true.", "page_ref": "prime:absence_of_evidence_vs_evidence_of_absence", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Target -> claim under search; search or test -> apparatus; no finding -> null observation.", "slug": "absence_of_evidence_vs_evidence_of_absence", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires a target claim, a directed search apparatus, and a null observation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A directed search or test returns no instance of its target.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime can concern a single search and therefore does not entail a cross-search comparison.", "slug": "absence_of_evidence_vs_evidence_of_absence"}], "residual_id": "r:null_finding_warrant_calibration:b044_a05_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b044_a05_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The same null result has different meaning when produced by a sensitive, well-scoped search versus a cursory or misdirected one. In this condition set, the requirement is: Negative results from searches with different detection capacities are being compared.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A negative result is being compared across searches with different detection capacities."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime can concern a single search and therefore does not entail a cross-search comparison.", "slug": "absence_of_evidence_vs_evidence_of_absence"}], "normalized_requirement": "Negative results from searches with different detection capacities are being compared.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Negative results from searches with different detection capacities are being compared.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The practical decision depends on whether the target is probably absent, merely unseen, or still plausible.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Examples include ruling out disease, closing an incident, declaring no defect, accepting a hypothesis, or deciding whether a risk is negligible. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The practical decision depends on whether the target is probably absent, merely unseen, or still plausible. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The practical decision depends on whether the target is probably absent, merely unseen, or still plausible.", "Examples include ruling out disease, closing an incident, declaring no defect, accepting a hypothesis, or deciding whether a risk is negligible."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "The practical decision depends on whether the target is probably absent, merely unseen, or still plausible."}, {"display_text": "The audience is tempted to equate no evidence with evidence of no problem.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The archetype is especially important when null findings will be used to justify assurance, dismissal, certification, resource withdrawal, or public communication. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The audience is tempted to equate no evidence with evidence of no problem. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The audience is tempted to equate no evidence with evidence of no problem.", "The archetype is especially important when null findings will be used to justify assurance, dismissal, certification, resource withdrawal, or public communication."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The audience is tempted to equate no evidence with evidence of no problem."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 44, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-044", "ledger_sha256": "eeb8a602a6457ebc37822f8c1fcd57a1a47508b650091865a1f96f0057c0c8b2"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Object-Centered Feature Binding", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:object_centered_feature_binding", "slug": "object_centered_feature_binding"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 5, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system receives features through separate processing channels or records. Each channel may be locally accurate, but none carries enough information to say which features belong to the same object, event, entity, or episode. If the system fuses too aggressively, it creates illusory objects, false records, mistaken identities, or unsafe actions. If it refuses to bind, it cannot recognize, act, remember, attribute, or reason about coherent units.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system receives features through separate processing channels or records. Each channel may be locally accurate, but none carries enough information to say which features belong to the same object, event, entity, or episode. If the system fuses too aggressively, it creates illusory objects, false records, mistaken identities, or unsafe actions. If it refuses to bind, it cannot recognize, act, remember, attribute, or reason about coherent units."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Parallel feature streams extracted along distinct channels are a mandatory component of the exact record.", "role_mapping": "Signals or attributes -> features; channels or stages -> parallel streams.", "slug": "binding_problem", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b044_a06_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Multiple features, signals, attributes, records, or observations arrive through different channels or at different processing stages. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Multiple features, signals, attributes, records, or observations arrive through different channels or at different processing stages."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Binding Problem", "one_liner": "Features extracted in parallel along separate channels must be re-paired to the right objects using co-occurrence information no single channel carries.", "page_ref": "prime:binding_problem", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Signals or attributes -> features; channels or stages -> parallel streams.", "slug": "binding_problem", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Parallel feature streams extracted along distinct channels are a mandatory component of the exact record."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Features or observations arrive through separate channels or processing stages.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The binding constraint exists because several multi-feature objects must recover their proper feature sets.", "role_mapping": "Candidate entities -> objects; observed attributes -> extracted features.", "slug": "binding_problem", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b044_a06_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: At least two candidate objects, events, entities, or episodes could explain the same observed features. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["At least two candidate objects, events, entities, or episodes could explain the same observed features."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Binding Problem", "one_liner": "Features extracted in parallel along separate channels must be re-paired to the right objects using co-occurrence information no single channel carries.", "page_ref": "prime:binding_problem", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Candidate entities -> objects; observed attributes -> extracted features.", "slug": "binding_problem", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The binding constraint exists because several multi-feature objects must recover their proper feature sets."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "At least two candidate objects or episodes could receive the same observed features.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A downstream consumer relies on the binding identifier to recover which features go together.", "role_mapping": "Downstream action -> consumer use; correct bundle -> proper object feature set.", "slug": "binding_problem", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b044_a06_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Downstream action depends on the correct bundle, not merely on the presence of each feature in isolation. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Downstream action depends on the correct bundle, not merely on the presence of each feature in isolation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Binding Problem", "one_liner": "Features extracted in parallel along separate channels must be re-paired to the right objects using co-occurrence information no single channel carries.", "page_ref": "prime:binding_problem", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Downstream action -> consumer use; correct bundle -> proper object feature set.", "slug": "binding_problem", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A downstream consumer relies on the binding identifier to recover which features go together."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Downstream use depends on recovering the correct feature bundle rather than isolated feature presence.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Mis-binding of correctly extracted features is the prime's diagnostic failure mode.", "role_mapping": "Misassignment -> illusory conjunction; object or episode -> represented object.", "slug": "binding_problem", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b044_a06_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Features can be misassigned because of simultaneity, proximity, occlusion, latency, crowding, missing identifiers, source ambiguity, or noise. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Features can be misassigned because of simultaneity, proximity, occlusion, latency, crowding, missing identifiers, source ambiguity, or noise."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Binding Problem", "one_liner": "Features extracted in parallel along separate channels must be re-paired to the right objects using co-occurrence information no single channel carries.", "page_ref": "prime:binding_problem", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Misassignment -> illusory conjunction; object or episode -> represented object.", "slug": "binding_problem", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Mis-binding of correctly extracted features is the prime's diagnostic failure mode."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Individually correct features can be assigned to the wrong object or episode.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires a binding mechanism and identifier that supply co-occurrence information absent from any single channel.", "role_mapping": "Usable cue -> binding identifier; shared context -> missing co-occurrence information.", "slug": "binding_problem", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b044_a06_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: There are usable binding cues such as co-occurrence, continuity, common fate, spatial boundary, provenance, recurrence, learned association, or active probe results. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["There are usable binding cues such as co-occurrence, continuity, common fate, spatial boundary, provenance, recurrence, learned association, or active probe results."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Binding Problem", "one_liner": "Features extracted in parallel along separate channels must be re-paired to the right objects using co-occurrence information no single channel carries.", "page_ref": "prime:binding_problem", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Usable cue -> binding identifier; shared context -> missing co-occurrence information.", "slug": "binding_problem", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires a binding mechanism and identifier that supply co-occurrence information absent from any single channel."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A co-occurrence, continuity, boundary, provenance, recurrence, association, or probe cue can supply missing binding information.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "False binding and missed binding both have meaningful cost.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: False binding and missed binding both have meaningful cost. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["False binding and missed binding both have meaningful cost."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "False binding and missed binding both have meaningful cost."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 44, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-044", "ledger_sha256": "eeb8a602a6457ebc37822f8c1fcd57a1a47508b650091865a1f96f0057c0c8b2"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Objective Boundary Governance", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:objective_boundary_governance", "slug": "objective_boundary_governance"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 6, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 6, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "6 of 7 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 7}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "An objective that was originally sized for a particular plan, capacity envelope, mandate, or legitimacy basis expands through incremental sub-objectives. Additions are easy because each one appears helpful, urgent, politically attractive, or naturally adjacent; removals are hard because subtracting a newly added objective creates disappointment, sunk-cost pressure, reputational loss, or coordination cost. The effective goal boundary ratchets outward while the formal objective may remain unchanged, producing diluted purpose, overloaded execution, unclear priority, and drift from the original basis of consent or resource allocation.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "An objective that was originally sized for a particular plan, capacity envelope, mandate, or legitimacy basis expands through incremental sub-objectives. Additions are easy because each one appears helpful, urgent, politically attractive, or naturally adjacent; removals are hard because subtracting a newly added objective creates disappointment, sunk-cost pressure, reputational loss, or coordination cost. The effective goal boundary ratchets outward while the formal objective may remain unchanged, producing diluted purpose, overloaded execution, unclear priority, and drift from the original basis of consent or resource allocation."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires a definable initial perimeter and an absent owner of its total trajectory.", "role_mapping": "Objective or charter -> initial perimeter; ungoverned trajectory -> absent trajectory owner.", "slug": "scope_creep", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The exact record starts from a scoped objective and adds sub-objectives without the original level of authorization.", "role_mapping": "Objective -> initial goal; inactive boundary governance -> unauthorized in-engagement addition.", "slug": "objective_creep", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b044_a07_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A bounded objective, mission, product goal, policy aim, research question, or project charter exists, but the boundary is not actively governed after work begins. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A bounded objective, mission, product goal, policy aim, research question, or project charter exists, but the boundary is not actively governed after work begins."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Scope Creep", "one_liner": "A perimeter ratchets outward through small additions each judged against a drifting current baseline rather than the original charter, with no owner of the trajectory.", "page_ref": "prime:scope_creep", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Objective or charter -> initial perimeter; ungoverned trajectory -> absent trajectory owner.", "slug": "scope_creep", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires a definable initial perimeter and an absent owner of its total trajectory."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Objective Creep", "one_liner": "An actor's effective goal boundary expands beyond what its original plan was sized for, as locally-reasonable sub-objectives are added under engagement through low-friction addition and high-friction subtraction, diluting the original objective.", "page_ref": "prime:objective_creep", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Objective -> initial goal; inactive boundary governance -> unauthorized in-engagement addition.", "slug": "objective_creep", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record starts from a scoped objective and adds sub-objectives without the original level of authorization."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A bounded original objective exists, but its trajectory is not actively governed after work begins.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Low-friction addition and high-friction subtraction are the mandatory ratchet engine.", "role_mapping": "Added requirement -> sub-objective; directional friction -> add/remove asymmetry.", "slug": "objective_creep", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "Asymmetric assent cost makes each increment cheap to accept and costly to refuse or reverse.", "role_mapping": "Addition -> increment; removal -> boundary defense.", "slug": "scope_creep", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b044_a07_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Participants can add sub-objectives, requirements, success criteria, exceptions, beneficiaries, use cases, safeguards, or adjacent ambitions with lower friction than they can remove them. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Participants can add sub-objectives, requirements, success criteria, exceptions, beneficiaries, use cases, safeguards, or adjacent ambitions with lower friction than they can remove them."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Objective Creep", "one_liner": "An actor's effective goal boundary expands beyond what its original plan was sized for, as locally-reasonable sub-objectives are added under engagement through low-friction addition and high-friction subtraction, diluting the original objective.", "page_ref": "prime:objective_creep", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Added requirement -> sub-objective; directional friction -> add/remove asymmetry.", "slug": "objective_creep", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Low-friction addition and high-friction subtraction are the mandatory ratchet engine."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Scope Creep", "one_liner": "A perimeter ratchets outward through small additions each judged against a drifting current baseline rather than the original charter, with no owner of the trajectory.", "page_ref": "prime:scope_creep", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Addition -> increment; removal -> boundary defense.", "slug": "scope_creep", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Asymmetric assent cost makes each increment cheap to accept and costly to refuse or reverse."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Sub-objectives are easier to add than to remove.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires locally plausible additions whose summed demand exceeds the original envelope and dilutes the primary objective.", "role_mapping": "Local rationale -> individually plausible addition; cumulative set -> summed demand; envelope -> original capacity.", "slug": "objective_creep", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b044_a07_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Each addition has a plausible local rationale, but the cumulative set no longer fits the original time, capacity, budget, legitimacy, measurement, or attention envelope. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Each addition has a plausible local rationale, but the cumulative set no longer fits the original time, capacity, budget, legitimacy, measurement, or attention envelope."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Objective Creep", "one_liner": "An actor's effective goal boundary expands beyond what its original plan was sized for, as locally-reasonable sub-objectives are added under engagement through low-friction addition and high-friction subtraction, diluting the original objective.", "page_ref": "prime:objective_creep", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Local rationale -> individually plausible addition; cumulative set -> summed demand; envelope -> original capacity.", "slug": "objective_creep", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires locally plausible additions whose summed demand exceeds the original envelope and dilutes the primary objective."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Each addition is locally plausible but the cumulative set exceeds the original resource or legitimacy envelope.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Baseline-relative evaluation against a drifting current state rather than the original charter is constitutive.", "role_mapping": "Current state -> moving baseline; original objective -> original perimeter.", "slug": "scope_creep", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b044_a07_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The baseline for evaluating new additions drifts from the original charter to the already-expanded current state. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The baseline for evaluating new additions drifts from the original charter to the already-expanded current state."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Scope Creep", "one_liner": "A perimeter ratchets outward through small additions each judged against a drifting current baseline rather than the original charter, with no owner of the trajectory.", "page_ref": "prime:scope_creep", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Current state -> moving baseline; original objective -> original perimeter.", "slug": "scope_creep", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Baseline-relative evaluation against a drifting current state rather than the original charter is constitutive."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Each addition is judged against the already-expanded current baseline rather than the original charter.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The absent trajectory owner is a mandatory exact-record role.", "role_mapping": "Accountable role -> trajectory owner; objective boundary -> perimeter motion.", "slug": "scope_creep", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b044_a07_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: No role is accountable for the trajectory of the objective boundary as distinct from delivery of the latest accepted additions. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["No role is accountable for the trajectory of the objective boundary as distinct from delivery of the latest accepted additions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Scope Creep", "one_liner": "A perimeter ratchets outward through small additions each judged against a drifting current baseline rather than the original charter, with no owner of the trajectory.", "page_ref": "prime:scope_creep", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Accountable role -> trajectory owner; objective boundary -> perimeter motion.", "slug": "scope_creep", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The absent trajectory owner is a mandatory exact-record role."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "No role owns the total trajectory of the objective boundary.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Objective creep can be driven solely by sunk work or coordination friction and need not involve one of the stated institutional pressures.", "slug": "objective_creep"}], "residual_id": "r:objective_boundary_governance:b044_a07_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b044_a07_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Political, reputational, commercial, safety, or identity pressures make subtracting objectives harder than adding them. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Political, reputational, commercial, safety, or identity pressures make subtracting objectives harder than adding them."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Objective creep can be driven solely by sunk work or coordination friction and need not involve one of the stated institutional pressures.", "slug": "objective_creep"}], "normalized_requirement": "Political, reputational, commercial, safety, or identity pressure makes subtraction harder than addition.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Political, reputational, commercial, safety, or identity pressure makes subtraction harder than addition.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Directional friction makes goal addition locally cheap and subtraction expensive.", "role_mapping": "Fast admission -> low-friction addition; slow removal -> high-friction subtraction.", "slug": "objective_creep", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "Cheap assent and effortful boundary defense create the required asymmetric paths.", "role_mapping": "Fast addition -> assent; slow removal -> refusal or reversal cost.", "slug": "scope_creep", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b044_a07_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A fast path admits new goals, while a slow path is required to remove or reset them. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A fast path admits new goals, while a slow path is required to remove or reset them."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Objective Creep", "one_liner": "An actor's effective goal boundary expands beyond what its original plan was sized for, as locally-reasonable sub-objectives are added under engagement through low-friction addition and high-friction subtraction, diluting the original objective.", "page_ref": "prime:objective_creep", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Fast admission -> low-friction addition; slow removal -> high-friction subtraction.", "slug": "objective_creep", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Directional friction makes goal addition locally cheap and subtraction expensive."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Scope Creep", "one_liner": "A perimeter ratchets outward through small additions each judged against a drifting current baseline rather than the original charter, with no owner of the trajectory.", "page_ref": "prime:scope_creep", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Fast addition -> assent; slow removal -> refusal or reversal cost.", "slug": "scope_creep", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Cheap assent and effortful boundary defense create the required asymmetric paths."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The process has a fast path for adding goals and a slow path for removing or resetting them.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 44, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-044", "ledger_sha256": "eeb8a602a6457ebc37822f8c1fcd57a1a47508b650091865a1f96f0057c0c8b2"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Objective Function Alignment", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:objective_function_alignment", "slug": "objective_function_alignment"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 5, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 2, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 2 of 5 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a gap between **what the system optimizes** and **what the system is supposed to accomplish**. The gap can be small at first, but optimization amplifies it. A proxy that was useful for learning can become dangerous when tied to rewards. A benchmark that once measured quality can become stale. A KPI that made sense locally can undermine system-level mission. A reward that captures one desirable behavior can create new incentives to ignore safety, fairness, trust, or long-term outcomes.\n\nThis failure is not only a measurement problem. It is a structural problem because the objective reshapes behavior. Once people, models, departments, or institutions know what is rewarded, they search for ways to satisfy that target. If the target is incomplete, the system may improve visibly while degrading the outcome that mattered.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system is subject to optimization pressure, but the target being optimized is implicit, underspecified, proxy-based, stale, gameable, or misaligned with the real outcome that stakeholders care about."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires an objective function over a feasible choice set and a declared sense of optimality.", "role_mapping": "Measurable target -> objective function; optimizing system -> search over feasible choices.", "slug": "optimization", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The exact record requires two or more specified objectives and an optimization or Pareto selection procedure.", "role_mapping": "Targets -> objective vector; actor -> optimizer.", "slug": "multiobjective_optimization", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime requires a system optimizing a mass-weighted aggregate objective.", "role_mapping": "Measurable target -> aggregate objective; optimization pressure -> mass-weighted optimum.", "slug": "majority_dominated_aggregate_objective", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The exact record requires a proxy placed under binding optimization pressure.", "role_mapping": "Measurable target -> proxy; optimizing actor -> pressured system.", "slug": "goodharts_law", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b044_a08_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: an algorithm, team, organization, or policy program is optimizing a measurable target. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["an algorithm, team, organization, or policy program is optimizing a measurable target"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Optimization", "one_liner": "Finds best solution under constraints.", "page_ref": "prime:optimization", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Measurable target -> objective function; optimizing system -> search over feasible choices.", "slug": "optimization", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires an objective function over a feasible choice set and a declared sense of optimality."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Multiobjective Optimization", "one_liner": "Balance competing objectives.", "page_ref": "prime:multiobjective_optimization", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Targets -> objective vector; actor -> optimizer.", "slug": "multiobjective_optimization", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires two or more specified objectives and an optimization or Pareto selection procedure."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Majority-Dominated Aggregate Objective", "one_liner": "An aggregate objective whose mass lies with the majority systematically underweights an operationally important minority.", "page_ref": "prime:majority_dominated_aggregate_objective", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Measurable target -> aggregate objective; optimization pressure -> mass-weighted optimum.", "slug": "majority_dominated_aggregate_objective", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a system optimizing a mass-weighted aggregate objective."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Goodhart's Law", "one_liner": "When a proxy is placed under binding optimization pressure, its correlation with the construct it was meant to indicate collapses.", "page_ref": "prime:goodharts_law", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Measurable target -> proxy; optimizing actor -> pressured system.", "slug": "goodharts_law", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires a proxy placed under binding optimization pressure."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A system is under binding optimization pressure on a measurable target.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A proxy under binding optimization pressure loses its correlation with the construct it was meant to indicate.", "role_mapping": "Metric -> proxy; desired outcome -> construct; collapse -> Goodhart failure.", "slug": "goodharts_law", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b044_a08_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: the easiest available metric is only an indirect proxy for the desired outcome. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["the easiest available metric is only an indirect proxy for the desired outcome"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Goodhart's Law", "one_liner": "When a proxy is placed under binding optimization pressure, its correlation with the construct it was meant to indicate collapses.", "page_ref": "prime:goodharts_law", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Metric -> proxy; desired outcome -> construct; collapse -> Goodhart failure.", "slug": "goodharts_law", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A proxy under binding optimization pressure loses its correlation with the construct it was meant to indicate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The optimized metric is an indirect proxy whose relation to the desired outcome can collapse under pressure.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires an objective function over a feasible choice set and a declared sense of optimality.", "role_mapping": "Measurable target -> objective function; optimizing system -> search over feasible choices.", "slug": "optimization", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The exact record requires two or more specified objectives and an optimization or Pareto selection procedure.", "role_mapping": "Targets -> objective vector; actor -> optimizer.", "slug": "multiobjective_optimization", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime requires a system optimizing a mass-weighted aggregate objective.", "role_mapping": "Measurable target -> aggregate objective; optimization pressure -> mass-weighted optimum.", "slug": "majority_dominated_aggregate_objective", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The exact record requires a proxy placed under binding optimization pressure.", "role_mapping": "Measurable target -> proxy; optimizing actor -> pressured system.", "slug": "goodharts_law", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b044_a08_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: an algorithm, team, organization, or policy program is optimizing a measurable target. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["an algorithm, team, organization, or policy program is optimizing a measurable target"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Optimization", "one_liner": "Finds best solution under constraints.", "page_ref": "prime:optimization", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Measurable target -> objective function; optimizing system -> search over feasible choices.", "slug": "optimization", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires an objective function over a feasible choice set and a declared sense of optimality."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Multiobjective Optimization", "one_liner": "Balance competing objectives.", "page_ref": "prime:multiobjective_optimization", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Targets -> objective vector; actor -> optimizer.", "slug": "multiobjective_optimization", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires two or more specified objectives and an optimization or Pareto selection procedure."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Majority-Dominated Aggregate Objective", "one_liner": "An aggregate objective whose mass lies with the majority systematically underweights an operationally important minority.", "page_ref": "prime:majority_dominated_aggregate_objective", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Measurable target -> aggregate objective; optimization pressure -> mass-weighted optimum.", "slug": "majority_dominated_aggregate_objective", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a system optimizing a mass-weighted aggregate objective."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Goodhart's Law", "one_liner": "When a proxy is placed under binding optimization pressure, its correlation with the construct it was meant to indicate collapses.", "page_ref": "prime:goodharts_law", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Measurable target -> proxy; optimizing actor -> pressured system.", "slug": "goodharts_law", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires a proxy placed under binding optimization pressure."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A system is under binding optimization pressure on a measurable target.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Aligned objectives can remain stable and do not require strategic response to a known metric.", "slug": "goal_congruence_alignment"}], "residual_id": "r:objective_function_alignment:b044_a08_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b044_a08_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: actors can change behavior once they know what is being measured or rewarded. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["actors can change behavior once they know what is being measured or rewarded"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Aligned objectives can remain stable and do not require strategic response to a known metric.", "slug": "goal_congruence_alignment"}], "normalized_requirement": "Actors who know the measurement or reward rule can adapt their behavior around it.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Actors who know the measurement or reward rule can adapt their behavior around it.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires an objective function over a feasible choice set and a declared sense of optimality.", "role_mapping": "Measurable target -> objective function; optimizing system -> search over feasible choices.", "slug": "optimization", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The exact record requires two or more specified objectives and an optimization or Pareto selection procedure.", "role_mapping": "Targets -> objective vector; actor -> optimizer.", "slug": "multiobjective_optimization", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime requires a system optimizing a mass-weighted aggregate objective.", "role_mapping": "Measurable target -> aggregate objective; optimization pressure -> mass-weighted optimum.", "slug": "majority_dominated_aggregate_objective", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The exact record requires a proxy placed under binding optimization pressure.", "role_mapping": "Measurable target -> proxy; optimizing actor -> pressured system.", "slug": "goodharts_law", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b044_a08_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: an algorithm, team, organization, or policy program is optimizing a measurable target. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["an algorithm, team, organization, or policy program is optimizing a measurable target"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Optimization", "one_liner": "Finds best solution under constraints.", "page_ref": "prime:optimization", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Measurable target -> objective function; optimizing system -> search over feasible choices.", "slug": "optimization", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires an objective function over a feasible choice set and a declared sense of optimality."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Multiobjective Optimization", "one_liner": "Balance competing objectives.", "page_ref": "prime:multiobjective_optimization", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Targets -> objective vector; actor -> optimizer.", "slug": "multiobjective_optimization", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires two or more specified objectives and an optimization or Pareto selection procedure."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Majority-Dominated Aggregate Objective", "one_liner": "An aggregate objective whose mass lies with the majority systematically underweights an operationally important minority.", "page_ref": "prime:majority_dominated_aggregate_objective", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Measurable target -> aggregate objective; optimization pressure -> mass-weighted optimum.", "slug": "majority_dominated_aggregate_objective", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a system optimizing a mass-weighted aggregate objective."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Goodhart's Law", "one_liner": "When a proxy is placed under binding optimization pressure, its correlation with the construct it was meant to indicate collapses.", "page_ref": "prime:goodharts_law", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Measurable target -> proxy; optimizing actor -> pressured system.", "slug": "goodharts_law", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires a proxy placed under binding optimization pressure."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A system is under binding optimization pressure on a measurable target.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The targeted proxy improves while its correlation with the real construct collapses.", "role_mapping": "Local target -> proxy; system quality -> construct; improvement/degradation -> correlation collapse.", "slug": "goodharts_law", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "Locally optimized stage objectives compound into an outcome worse than the joint benchmark.", "role_mapping": "Local target -> scoped stage objective; system outcome -> joint benchmark.", "slug": "serial_local_optimization_failure", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b044_a08_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: a local target may improve while system-level quality, safety, fairness, trust, or mission value degrades. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["a local target may improve while system-level quality, safety, fairness, trust, or mission value degrades"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Goodhart's Law", "one_liner": "When a proxy is placed under binding optimization pressure, its correlation with the construct it was meant to indicate collapses.", "page_ref": "prime:goodharts_law", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Local target -> proxy; system quality -> construct; improvement/degradation -> correlation collapse.", "slug": "goodharts_law", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The targeted proxy improves while its correlation with the real construct collapses."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Serial Local Optimization Failure", "one_liner": "Stages arranged in series each optimize a local objective while treating their effects on other stages as outside that objective, so individually rational choices compound into an outcome worse than joint optimization.", "page_ref": "prime:serial_local_optimization_failure", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Local target -> scoped stage objective; system outcome -> joint benchmark.", "slug": "serial_local_optimization_failure", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Locally optimized stage objectives compound into an outcome worse than the joint benchmark."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A local or proxy target improves while system-level quality or mission value degrades.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires an objective function over a feasible choice set and a declared sense of optimality.", "role_mapping": "Measurable target -> objective function; optimizing system -> search over feasible choices.", "slug": "optimization", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The exact record requires two or more specified objectives and an optimization or Pareto selection procedure.", "role_mapping": "Targets -> objective vector; actor -> optimizer.", "slug": "multiobjective_optimization", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime requires a system optimizing a mass-weighted aggregate objective.", "role_mapping": "Measurable target -> aggregate objective; optimization pressure -> mass-weighted optimum.", "slug": "majority_dominated_aggregate_objective", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The exact record requires a proxy placed under binding optimization pressure.", "role_mapping": "Measurable target -> proxy; optimizing actor -> pressured system.", "slug": "goodharts_law", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b044_a08_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: an algorithm, team, organization, or policy program is optimizing a measurable target. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["an algorithm, team, organization, or policy program is optimizing a measurable target"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Optimization", "one_liner": "Finds best solution under constraints.", "page_ref": "prime:optimization", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Measurable target -> objective function; optimizing system -> search over feasible choices.", "slug": "optimization", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires an objective function over a feasible choice set and a declared sense of optimality."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Multiobjective Optimization", "one_liner": "Balance competing objectives.", "page_ref": "prime:multiobjective_optimization", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Targets -> objective vector; actor -> optimizer.", "slug": "multiobjective_optimization", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires two or more specified objectives and an optimization or Pareto selection procedure."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Majority-Dominated Aggregate Objective", "one_liner": "An aggregate objective whose mass lies with the majority systematically underweights an operationally important minority.", "page_ref": "prime:majority_dominated_aggregate_objective", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Measurable target -> aggregate objective; optimization pressure -> mass-weighted optimum.", "slug": "majority_dominated_aggregate_objective", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a system optimizing a mass-weighted aggregate objective."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Goodhart's Law", "one_liner": "When a proxy is placed under binding optimization pressure, its correlation with the construct it was meant to indicate collapses.", "page_ref": "prime:goodharts_law", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Measurable target -> proxy; optimizing actor -> pressured system.", "slug": "goodharts_law", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires a proxy placed under binding optimization pressure."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A system is under binding optimization pressure on a measurable target.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Multiple-objective optimization can begin after objectives and stakeholder preferences are fully agreed.", "slug": "multiobjective_optimization"}], "residual_id": "r:objective_function_alignment:b044_a08_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b044_a08_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: optimization begins before stakeholders have agreed what should count as improvement. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["optimization begins before stakeholders have agreed what should count as improvement"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Multiple-objective optimization can begin after objectives and stakeholder preferences are fully agreed.", "slug": "multiobjective_optimization"}], "normalized_requirement": "Optimization begins before stakeholders agree on what improvement means.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Optimization begins before stakeholders agree on what improvement means.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B5", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires an objective function over a feasible choice set and a declared sense of optimality.", "role_mapping": "Measurable target -> objective function; optimizing system -> search over feasible choices.", "slug": "optimization", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The exact record requires two or more specified objectives and an optimization or Pareto selection procedure.", "role_mapping": "Targets -> objective vector; actor -> optimizer.", "slug": "multiobjective_optimization", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime requires a system optimizing a mass-weighted aggregate objective.", "role_mapping": "Measurable target -> aggregate objective; optimization pressure -> mass-weighted optimum.", "slug": "majority_dominated_aggregate_objective", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The exact record requires a proxy placed under binding optimization pressure.", "role_mapping": "Measurable target -> proxy; optimizing actor -> pressured system.", "slug": "goodharts_law", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b044_a08_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: an algorithm, team, organization, or policy program is optimizing a measurable target. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["an algorithm, team, organization, or policy program is optimizing a measurable target"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Optimization", "one_liner": "Finds best solution under constraints.", "page_ref": "prime:optimization", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Measurable target -> objective function; optimizing system -> search over feasible choices.", "slug": "optimization", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires an objective function over a feasible choice set and a declared sense of optimality."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Multiobjective Optimization", "one_liner": "Balance competing objectives.", "page_ref": "prime:multiobjective_optimization", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Targets -> objective vector; actor -> optimizer.", "slug": "multiobjective_optimization", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires two or more specified objectives and an optimization or Pareto selection procedure."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Majority-Dominated Aggregate Objective", "one_liner": "An aggregate objective whose mass lies with the majority systematically underweights an operationally important minority.", "page_ref": "prime:majority_dominated_aggregate_objective", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Measurable target -> aggregate objective; optimization pressure -> mass-weighted optimum.", "slug": "majority_dominated_aggregate_objective", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a system optimizing a mass-weighted aggregate objective."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Goodhart's Law", "one_liner": "When a proxy is placed under binding optimization pressure, its correlation with the construct it was meant to indicate collapses.", "page_ref": "prime:goodharts_law", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Measurable target -> proxy; optimizing actor -> pressured system.", "slug": "goodharts_law", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires a proxy placed under binding optimization pressure."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A system is under binding optimization pressure on a measurable target.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "That prime requires the objective itself to move faster than the adapter; here the encoded objective is stationary while the represented context moves.", "slug": "non_stationary_objective"}], "residual_id": "r:objective_function_alignment:b044_a08_c7", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b044_a08_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: the target has changed less often than the context it is supposed to represent. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["the target has changed less often than the context it is supposed to represent"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "That prime requires the objective itself to move faster than the adapter; here the encoded objective is stationary while the represented context moves.", "slug": "non_stationary_objective"}], "normalized_requirement": "The encoded target changes more slowly than the context it is meant to represent.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The encoded target changes more slowly than the context it is meant to represent.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 5", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "a decision process ranks, selects, rewards, recommends, funds, penalizes, or prioritizes options.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The target may be a score, a metric, a rank, a reward, a loss function, a policy goal, a service-level objective, a grading rubric, a decision criterion, or a dashboard indicator. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: a decision process ranks, selects, rewards, recommends, funds, penalizes, or prioritizes options. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["a decision process ranks, selects, rewards, recommends, funds, penalizes, or prioritizes options", "The target may be a score, a metric, a rank, a reward, a loss function, a policy goal, a service-level objective, a grading rubric, a decision criterion, or a dashboard indicator."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "a decision process ranks, selects, rewards, recommends, funds, penalizes, or prioritizes options"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 44, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-044", "ledger_sha256": "eeb8a602a6457ebc37822f8c1fcd57a1a47508b650091865a1f96f0057c0c8b2"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Objective Weighting Governance", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:objective_weighting_governance", "slug": "objective_weighting_governance"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A composite objective can make normative tradeoffs look technical. The system appears to optimize a neutral score, but the score may hide who decided that one objective matters more than another, whether objectives may compensate for one another, and whether affected parties can understand or challenge the result.\n\nThis creates a structural risk: the decision rule can become legitimate-looking while concealing contested value judgments.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A composite score or optimization objective embeds value tradeoffs that stakeholders cannot inspect, challenge, legitimate, or revise."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires multiple objectives plus preference aggregation or final solution selection.", "role_mapping": "Objectives -> objective vector; ranking or selection -> preference articulation over the Pareto set.", "slug": "multiobjective_optimization", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b044_a09_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A decision combines several objectives into one ranking, score, allocation, or selection rule. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A decision combines several objectives into one ranking, score, allocation, or selection rule."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Multiobjective Optimization", "one_liner": "Balance competing objectives.", "page_ref": "prime:multiobjective_optimization", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Objectives -> objective vector; ranking or selection -> preference articulation over the Pareto set.", "slug": "multiobjective_optimization", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires multiple objectives plus preference aggregation or final solution selection."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Several objectives are combined into one ranking, score, allocation, or selection rule.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime begins from heterogeneous values lacking a common metric and constructs one for comparison.", "role_mapping": "Objectives -> heterogeneous values; unlike scales -> absent common metric.", "slug": "value_commensuration", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b044_a09_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Objectives are contested, unlike, or only partially measurable. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Objectives are contested, unlike, or only partially measurable."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Value Commensuration", "one_liner": "Translate heterogeneous values into common metric for comparison.", "page_ref": "prime:value_commensuration", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Objectives -> heterogeneous values; unlike scales -> absent common metric.", "slug": "value_commensuration", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime begins from heterogeneous values lacking a common metric and constructs one for comparison."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The objectives are heterogeneous, contested, or only partly measurable.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A multiobjective problem can have a robust selected solution across a wide range of weights.", "slug": "multiobjective_optimization"}], "residual_id": "r:objective_weighting_governance:b044_a09_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b044_a09_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Small weight changes may alter rankings or selected options. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Small weight changes may alter rankings or selected options."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A multiobjective problem can have a robust selected solution across a wide range of weights.", "slug": "multiobjective_optimization"}], "normalized_requirement": "Small changes in weights can change the ranking or selected option.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Small changes in weights can change the ranking or selected option.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Recognized legitimate authority has the opposite clarity and need not be disputed.", "slug": "authority"}], "residual_id": "r:objective_weighting_governance:b044_a09_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b044_a09_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The authority to choose weights is unclear or disputed. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The authority to choose weights is unclear or disputed."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Recognized legitimate authority has the opposite clarity and need not be disputed.", "slug": "authority"}], "normalized_requirement": "Authority to choose the weights is unclear or disputed.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Authority to choose the weights is unclear or disputed.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The weighted result affects access, funding, enforcement, triage, employment, procurement, or public legitimacy.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when the weighting rule affects access to resources, ranking, funding, triage, selection, enforcement, or public legitimacy. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The weighted result affects access, funding, enforcement, triage, employment, procurement, or public legitimacy. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The weighted result affects access, funding, enforcement, triage, employment, procurement, or public legitimacy.", "It is especially useful when the weighting rule affects access to resources, ranking, funding, triage, selection, enforcement, or public legitimacy."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "The weighted result affects access, funding, enforcement, triage, employment, procurement, or public legitimacy."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 44, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-044", "ledger_sha256": "eeb8a602a6457ebc37822f8c1fcd57a1a47508b650091865a1f96f0057c0c8b2"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Observability Instrumentation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:observability_instrumentation", "slug": "observability_instrumentation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 4, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 2, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 2 of 4 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is **control blindness**: a system has internal state that matters, but the people or mechanisms responsible for action cannot infer it from available evidence. The gap may be technical, physical, organizational, social, temporal, or ethical.\n\nHidden state can include health, risk, load, drift, understanding, deterioration, dependency failure, user experience, trust, overload, or process blockage. Without instrumentation, actors rely on anecdotes, lagging outcomes, visible crises, or intuition. The result is late diagnosis, reactive control, avoidable harm, and repeated surprises.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system's internal state, health, risk, capacity, failure path, or trajectory cannot be directly observed, so diagnosis and control are delayed, distorted, or based on guesswork."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record defines whether internal states can be distinguished from external outputs over time.", "role_mapping": "Internal condition -> state X; exposed signal -> observation Y; interface -> observation map g.", "slug": "observability", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The exact record asks whether an internal unknown can be uniquely recovered from observable signals.", "role_mapping": "Hidden state -> internal unknown; external signal -> observable evidence.", "slug": "identifiability", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b044_a10_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Relevant internal state is hidden behind interfaces, distance, complexity, aggregation, social opacity, or physical inaccessibility. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Relevant internal state is hidden behind interfaces, distance, complexity, aggregation, social opacity, or physical inaccessibility."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Observability", "one_liner": "Infer internal state externally.", "page_ref": "prime:observability", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Internal condition -> state X; exposed signal -> observation Y; interface -> observation map g.", "slug": "observability", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record defines whether internal states can be distinguished from external outputs over time."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Identifiability", "one_liner": "Whether an internal unknown can in principle be uniquely recovered from the observable signal a system makes available.", "page_ref": "prime:identifiability", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Hidden state -> internal unknown; external signal -> observable evidence.", "slug": "identifiability", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record asks whether an internal unknown can be uniquely recovered from observable signals."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A relevant internal state is accessible only through an external observation map.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P086-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a failure and its downstream harm recipient.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A system has a failure that can affect a downstream recipient.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve actual harm caused by the focal failure; coincidental harm in the failure's presence is insufficient.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The focal failure causes or produces harm experienced by the selected downstream recipient.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail that harm caused by the focal failure precedes detection of that same failure, including the 'only after' constraint.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The focal failure is detected only after that failure-caused harm occurs.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires users to experience harm before failure detection.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The harmed downstream recipients are users.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires patients to experience harm before failure detection.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The harmed downstream recipients are patients.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires workers to experience harm before failure detection.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The harmed downstream recipients are workers.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires citizens to experience harm before failure detection.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The harmed downstream recipients are citizens.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a downstream system to experience harm before failure detection.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The harmed recipient is a downstream system.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A focal failure is detected only after it causes harm to a listed downstream party or system.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "failure detection occurs only after failure-caused downstream harm", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P086-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Continuous monitoring can detect deviations before harm and does not entail late detection.", "slug": "monitoring"}], "residual_id": "r:observability_instrumentation:b044_a10_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b044_a10_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Failures are detected only after users, patients, workers, citizens, or downstream systems experience harm. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Failures are detected only after users, patients, workers, citizens, or downstream systems experience harm."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Continuous monitoring can detect deviations before harm and does not entail late detection.", "slug": "monitoring"}], "normalized_requirement": "Failure is detected only after downstream people or systems experience harm.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Failure is detected only after downstream people or systems experience harm.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record defines whether internal states can be distinguished from external outputs over time.", "role_mapping": "Internal condition -> state X; exposed signal -> observation Y; interface -> observation map g.", "slug": "observability", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The exact record asks whether an internal unknown can be uniquely recovered from observable signals.", "role_mapping": "Hidden state -> internal unknown; external signal -> observable evidence.", "slug": "identifiability", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b044_a10_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Relevant internal state is hidden behind interfaces, distance, complexity, aggregation, social opacity, or physical inaccessibility. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Relevant internal state is hidden behind interfaces, distance, complexity, aggregation, social opacity, or physical inaccessibility."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Observability", "one_liner": "Infer internal state externally.", "page_ref": "prime:observability", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Internal condition -> state X; exposed signal -> observation Y; interface -> observation map g.", "slug": "observability", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record defines whether internal states can be distinguished from external outputs over time."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Identifiability", "one_liner": "Whether an internal unknown can in principle be uniquely recovered from the observable signal a system makes available.", "page_ref": "prime:identifiability", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Hidden state -> internal unknown; external signal -> observable evidence.", "slug": "identifiability", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record asks whether an internal unknown can be uniquely recovered from observable signals."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A relevant internal state is accessible only through an external observation map.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires a received failure announcement whose repair register omits target, cause, action, or escalation content.", "role_mapping": "Metric or alert -> signalling channel; missing interpretation/action -> empty repair register.", "slug": "diagnostically_inert_signal", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b044_a10_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Operators collect many metrics but cannot explain what state those metrics represent or what action they should trigger. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Operators collect many metrics but cannot explain what state those metrics represent or what action they should trigger."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Diagnostically Inert Signal", "one_liner": "A signal that announces a failure but carries none of the content needed to act on it, splitting detection-completeness from recovery-completeness.", "page_ref": "prime:diagnostically_inert_signal", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Metric or alert -> signalling channel; missing interpretation/action -> empty repair register.", "slug": "diagnostically_inert_signal", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires a received failure announcement whose repair register omits target, cause, action, or escalation content."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Available metrics lack at least one state, cause, action, or escalation field needed for diagnosis and response.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record defines whether internal states can be distinguished from external outputs over time.", "role_mapping": "Internal condition -> state X; exposed signal -> observation Y; interface -> observation map g.", "slug": "observability", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The exact record asks whether an internal unknown can be uniquely recovered from observable signals.", "role_mapping": "Hidden state -> internal unknown; external signal -> observable evidence.", "slug": "identifiability", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b044_a10_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Relevant internal state is hidden behind interfaces, distance, complexity, aggregation, social opacity, or physical inaccessibility. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Relevant internal state is hidden behind interfaces, distance, complexity, aggregation, social opacity, or physical inaccessibility."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Observability", "one_liner": "Infer internal state externally.", "page_ref": "prime:observability", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Internal condition -> state X; exposed signal -> observation Y; interface -> observation map g.", "slug": "observability", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record defines whether internal states can be distinguished from external outputs over time."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Identifiability", "one_liner": "Whether an internal unknown can in principle be uniquely recovered from the observable signal a system makes available.", "page_ref": "prime:identifiability", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Hidden state -> internal unknown; external signal -> observable evidence.", "slug": "identifiability", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record asks whether an internal unknown can be uniquely recovered from observable signals."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A relevant internal state is accessible only through an external observation map.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Instrument, observer, sampling, resolution, and environmental limits necessarily introduce error into observed state.", "role_mapping": "Observation signal -> measured value; corruption -> measurement error.", "slug": "measurement_uncertainty", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b044_a10_c5a", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Signals exist but are noisy, delayed, missing, over-aggregated, or disconnected from responsibility. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Signals exist but are noisy, delayed, missing, over-aggregated, or disconnected from responsibility."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Measurement Uncertainty and Observational Noise", "one_liner": "Measurement noise arises from instrument and observation limits.", "page_ref": "prime:measurement_uncertainty", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Observation signal -> measured value; corruption -> measurement error.", "slug": "measurement_uncertainty", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Instrument, observer, sampling, resolution, and environmental limits necessarily introduce error into observed state."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Observation signals are corrupted by instrument or sampling noise.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record defines whether internal states can be distinguished from external outputs over time.", "role_mapping": "Internal condition -> state X; exposed signal -> observation Y; interface -> observation map g.", "slug": "observability", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The exact record asks whether an internal unknown can be uniquely recovered from observable signals.", "role_mapping": "Hidden state -> internal unknown; external signal -> observable evidence.", "slug": "identifiability", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b044_a10_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Relevant internal state is hidden behind interfaces, distance, complexity, aggregation, social opacity, or physical inaccessibility. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Relevant internal state is hidden behind interfaces, distance, complexity, aggregation, social opacity, or physical inaccessibility."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Observability", "one_liner": "Infer internal state externally.", "page_ref": "prime:observability", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Internal condition -> state X; exposed signal -> observation Y; interface -> observation map g.", "slug": "observability", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record defines whether internal states can be distinguished from external outputs over time."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Identifiability", "one_liner": "Whether an internal unknown can in principle be uniquely recovered from the observable signal a system makes available.", "page_ref": "prime:identifiability", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Hidden state -> internal unknown; external signal -> observable evidence.", "slug": "identifiability", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record asks whether an internal unknown can be uniquely recovered from observable signals."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A relevant internal state is accessible only through an external observation map.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A system can be fully observable with timely, complete, granular, and owned signals.", "slug": "observability"}], "residual_id": "r:observability_instrumentation:b044_a10_c5b", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b044_a10_c5b", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Signals exist but are noisy, delayed, missing, over-aggregated, or disconnected from responsibility. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Signals exist but are noisy, delayed, missing, over-aggregated, or disconnected from responsibility."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A system can be fully observable with timely, complete, granular, and owned signals.", "slug": "observability"}], "normalized_requirement": "Observation signals are delayed, missing, over-aggregated, or disconnected from responsibility.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Observation signals are delayed, missing, over-aggregated, or disconnected from responsibility.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The system is distributed across layers, actors, services, sites, or handoffs.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Good cases include distributed software, clinical deterioration detection, process bottleneck diagnosis, manufacturing quality drift, infrastructure monitoring, public-service risk review, and learning-support systems. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The system is distributed across layers, actors, services, sites, or handoffs. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The system is distributed across layers, actors, services, sites, or handoffs.", "Good cases include distributed software, clinical deterioration detection, process bottleneck diagnosis, manufacturing quality drift, infrastructure monitoring, public-service risk review, and learning-support systems."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The system is distributed across layers, actors, services, sites, or handoffs."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 44, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-044", "ledger_sha256": "eeb8a602a6457ebc37822f8c1fcd57a1a47508b650091865a1f96f0057c0c8b2"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Observational Equivalence Resolution", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:observational_equivalence_resolution", "slug": "observational_equivalence_resolution"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 2 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 2}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a many-to-one mapping from hidden generators to observed outputs. Several causes, states, models, or agents can produce the same symptom, metric, behavior, trace, or result. The observation is real, but it is underdetermined.\n\nThis creates a dangerous temptation: treating one candidate explanation as uniquely identified because it is vivid, familiar, convenient, or compatible with the available evidence. Compatibility is not identification. A candidate can explain the observation while still being indistinguishable from other candidates.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Several underlying causes or models generate the same observed outputs under the available frame, yet the decision requires distinguishing them."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "This branch preserves the complete remedy-free diagnostic route; goals, feasibility clauses, gates, deployment constraints, and supporting context remain outside the DNF."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "EXT001-C066", "dnf": [["EXT001-U066-O1"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"obligation_id": "EXT001-U066-O1", "predicate": "The same observed pattern can be produced by several different underlying causes, states, or models."}], "predicate": "The same observed pattern can be produced by several different underlying causes, states, or models.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "The same observed pattern can be produced by several different underlying causes, states, or models.", "unit_id": "EXT001-U066"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"catalog_exhaustion": "CONDITION_LEVEL", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The same observed pattern can be produced by several different underlying causes, states, or models.", "slug": "consistency_model"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The same observed pattern can be produced by several different underlying causes, states, or models.", "slug": "ensemble"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The same observed pattern can be produced by several different underlying causes, states, or models.", "slug": "pattern_in_design"}], "residual_id": "EXT001:observational_equivalence_resolution:C01", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding."}}, "condition_id": "ext001_observational_equivalence_resolution_a01", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored trigger_conditions, structural_problem fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: The same observed pattern can be produced by several different underlying causes, states, or models.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The same observed pattern can be produced by several different underlying causes, states, or models."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The same observed pattern can be produced by several different underlying causes, states, or models.", "slug": "consistency_model"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The same observed pattern can be produced by several different underlying causes, states, or models.", "slug": "ensemble"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The same observed pattern can be produced by several different underlying causes, states, or models.", "slug": "pattern_in_design"}], "normalized_requirement": "The same observed pattern can be produced by several different underlying causes, states, or models.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The same observed pattern can be produced by several different underlying causes, states, or models.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "EXT001-C067", "dnf": [["EXT001-U067-O1"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"obligation_id": "EXT001-U067-O1", "predicate": "Available observations lack the discriminating power needed to distinguish the alternatives."}], "predicate": "Available observations lack the discriminating power needed to distinguish the alternatives.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Available observations lack the discriminating power needed to distinguish the alternatives.", "unit_id": "EXT001-U067"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"catalog_exhaustion": "CONDITION_LEVEL", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Available observations lack the discriminating power needed to distinguish the alternatives.", "slug": "nirvana_fallacy"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Available observations lack the discriminating power needed to distinguish the alternatives.", "slug": "invisible_affordance"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Available observations lack the discriminating power needed to distinguish the alternatives.", "slug": "unfalsifiability"}], "residual_id": "EXT001:observational_equivalence_resolution:C03", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding."}}, "condition_id": "ext001_observational_equivalence_resolution_a03", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored trigger_conditions, structural_problem fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: Available observations lack the discriminating power needed to distinguish the alternatives.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Available observations lack the discriminating power needed to distinguish the alternatives."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Available observations lack the discriminating power needed to distinguish the alternatives.", "slug": "nirvana_fallacy"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Available observations lack the discriminating power needed to distinguish the alternatives.", "slug": "invisible_affordance"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Available observations lack the discriminating power needed to distinguish the alternatives.", "slug": "unfalsifiability"}], "normalized_requirement": "Available observations lack the discriminating power needed to distinguish the alternatives.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Available observations lack the discriminating power needed to distinguish the alternatives.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Different explanations imply materially different actions, predictions, responsibilities, or risks.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored trigger_conditions, structural_problem fields; the source file was not modified. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: Different explanations imply materially different actions, predictions, responsibilities, or risks. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Different explanations imply materially different actions, predictions, responsibilities, or risks.", "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored trigger_conditions, structural_problem fields; the source file was not modified."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "Different explanations imply materially different actions, predictions, responsibilities, or risks."}, {"display_text": "Stakeholders press for a unique attribution before the evidence distinguishes alternatives.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored trigger_conditions, structural_problem fields; the source file was not modified. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Stakeholders press for a unique attribution before the evidence distinguishes alternatives. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders press for a unique attribution before the evidence distinguishes alternatives.", "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored trigger_conditions, structural_problem fields; the source file was not modified."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Stakeholders press for a unique attribution before the evidence distinguishes alternatives."}, {"display_text": "Further observation, perturbation, or explicit uncertainty treatment is possible.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored trigger_conditions, structural_problem fields; the source file was not modified. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: Further observation, perturbation, or explicit uncertainty treatment is possible. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Further observation, perturbation, or explicit uncertainty treatment is possible.", "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored trigger_conditions, structural_problem fields; the source file was not modified."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Further observation, perturbation, or explicit uncertainty treatment is possible."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"candidate_ledger_sha256": "96f72d2139077fd57bf795048ebef33b3fd574b20963170080ec916b5b3b92fe", "extension_id": "new-archetypes-extension-001", "ledger_id": "prime-production-v1.2-extension-001", "ledger_sha256": "9644520614744632d1d36da44b1acd77ce432852c6083eb871203521c166efce"}, "base_projection_sha256": "841e0c7f3cb8e8054475ad29a8a14745a416b4fc115559a44878b94292e673ec", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "ca09ed9fe1598ce7072755b530de5553f5ee0a7cd64ae82d9e4a4e2149a37788", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Observer Effect Accounting", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:observer_effect_accounting", "slug": "observer_effect_accounting"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 4, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 3, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 3 of 4 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The system state used for inference or control has been altered by the process that made it\nobservable, but the induced transition is attributed to the system alone. The observation\nchannel may transfer force, heat, material, load, latency, attention, expectancy,\ninformation, or governance pressure. Multiple individually small channels can combine into\na material change.\n\nThe core tension is that stronger coupling often improves resolution or timeliness while\nalso increasing disturbance. A perfect unobserved baseline is difficult because observing\nit can expose it. Without an explicit counterfactual, teams mistake monitored behavior for\nordinary behavior, treat probe overhead as system load, or report a disturbed physical\nstate as if measurement had been transparent.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "The system state used for inference or control has been altered by the process that made it observable, but the resulting change is attributed to the system alone."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Measurement-apparatus interaction is mandatory and changes true state while yielding the recorded value.", "role_mapping": "Sensor or observer -> apparatus; target -> system; coupling -> measurement interaction.", "slug": "observer_effect", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b044_a11_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The sensor, probe, sampler, observer, or monitoring policy physically or behaviorally couples to the target. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The sensor, probe, sampler, observer, or monitoring policy physically or behaviorally couples to the target."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Observer Effect", "one_liner": "Observation alters system.", "page_ref": "prime:observer_effect", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Sensor or observer -> apparatus; target -> system; coupling -> measurement interaction.", "slug": "observer_effect", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Measurement-apparatus interaction is mandatory and changes true state while yielding the recorded value."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The observation apparatus physically or behaviorally couples to the target.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Disturbance magnitude depends on coupling strength, basis, intrusiveness, and system sensitivity.", "role_mapping": "Observation mode -> coupling parameters; trajectory change -> state disturbance.", "slug": "observer_effect", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b044_a11_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Observation intensity, timing, visibility, or repetition can change the system trajectory. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Observation intensity, timing, visibility, or repetition can change the system trajectory."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Observer Effect", "one_liner": "Observation alters system.", "page_ref": "prime:observer_effect", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Observation mode -> coupling parameters; trajectory change -> state disturbance.", "slug": "observer_effect", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Disturbance magnitude depends on coupling strength, basis, intrusiveness, and system sensitivity."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Changing observation intensity, timing, visibility, or repetition can change the target trajectory.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Measurement-apparatus interaction is mandatory and changes true state while yielding the recorded value.", "role_mapping": "Sensor or observer -> apparatus; target -> system; coupling -> measurement interaction.", "slug": "observer_effect", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b044_a11_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The sensor, probe, sampler, observer, or monitoring policy physically or behaviorally couples to the target. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The sensor, probe, sampler, observer, or monitoring policy physically or behaviorally couples to the target."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Observer Effect", "one_liner": "Observation alters system.", "page_ref": "prime:observer_effect", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Sensor or observer -> apparatus; target -> system; coupling -> measurement interaction.", "slug": "observer_effect", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Measurement-apparatus interaction is mandatory and changes true state while yielding the recorded value."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The observation apparatus physically or behaviorally couples to the target.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P086-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve data collection as the operative act and the observed target as its substrate.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An act of data collection is performed on or through a focal target.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve collection-to-consumption direction, not coincidental resource use.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The act of collecting data consumes a resource of that target.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve scarcity rather than consumption of an abundant resource.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The consumed resource is scarce for the target.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires target capacity to be consumed by data collection.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The scarce resource is capacity.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires target energy to be consumed by data collection.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The scarce resource is energy.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires target bandwidth to be consumed by data collection.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The scarce resource is bandwidth.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires target attention to be consumed by data collection.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The scarce resource is attention.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires target material to be consumed by data collection.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The scarce resource is material.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Collecting data consumes one listed scarce resource of the observed target.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "data collection consumes scarce target resources", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P086-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The observer effect can alter a state without consuming a scarce capacity or material.", "slug": "observer_effect"}], "residual_id": "r:observer_effect_accounting:b044_a11_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b044_a11_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The act of collecting data consumes scarce capacity, energy, bandwidth, attention, or material. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The act of collecting data consumes scarce capacity, energy, bandwidth, attention, or material."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The observer effect can alter a state without consuming a scarce capacity or material.", "slug": "observer_effect"}], "normalized_requirement": "Collecting data consumes scarce target capacity, energy, bandwidth, attention, or material.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Collecting data consumes scarce target capacity, energy, bandwidth, attention, or material.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Measurement-apparatus interaction is mandatory and changes true state while yielding the recorded value.", "role_mapping": "Sensor or observer -> apparatus; target -> system; coupling -> measurement interaction.", "slug": "observer_effect", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b044_a11_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The sensor, probe, sampler, observer, or monitoring policy physically or behaviorally couples to the target. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The sensor, probe, sampler, observer, or monitoring policy physically or behaviorally couples to the target."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Observer Effect", "one_liner": "Observation alters system.", "page_ref": "prime:observer_effect", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Sensor or observer -> apparatus; target -> system; coupling -> measurement interaction.", "slug": "observer_effect", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Measurement-apparatus interaction is mandatory and changes true state while yielding the recorded value."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The observation apparatus physically or behaviorally couples to the target.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Audience presence changes incentives through reputation and necessarily produces behavioral divergence.", "role_mapping": "Monitoring presence -> audience; detected observation -> perceived public context; adaptation -> reputational response.", "slug": "public_vs_private_contexts", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b044_a11_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Subjects or agents can detect monitoring and adapt strategically or reflexively. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Subjects or agents can detect monitoring and adapt strategically or reflexively."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Public vs. Private Contexts", "one_liner": "Audience presence alters motivation and behavior through reputation.", "page_ref": "prime:public_vs_private_contexts", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Monitoring presence -> audience; detected observation -> perceived public context; adaptation -> reputational response.", "slug": "public_vs_private_contexts", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Audience presence changes incentives through reputation and necessarily produces behavioral divergence."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A subject detects audience or monitoring presence and adapts behavior through reputational or strategic response.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Measurement-apparatus interaction is mandatory and changes true state while yielding the recorded value.", "role_mapping": "Sensor or observer -> apparatus; target -> system; coupling -> measurement interaction.", "slug": "observer_effect", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b044_a11_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The sensor, probe, sampler, observer, or monitoring policy physically or behaviorally couples to the target. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The sensor, probe, sampler, observer, or monitoring policy physically or behaviorally couples to the target."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Observer Effect", "one_liner": "Observation alters system.", "page_ref": "prime:observer_effect", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Sensor or observer -> apparatus; target -> system; coupling -> measurement interaction.", "slug": "observer_effect", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Measurement-apparatus interaction is mandatory and changes true state while yielding the recorded value."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The observation apparatus physically or behaviorally couples to the target.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact measurement result and disturbance depend on measurement basis and coupling strength.", "role_mapping": "Mode, dose, or sequence -> basis and coupling; disagreement -> different disturbed measurements.", "slug": "observer_effect", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b044_a11_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Measurements disagree when observation mode, dose, or sequence changes. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Measurements disagree when observation mode, dose, or sequence changes."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Observer Effect", "one_liner": "Observation alters system.", "page_ref": "prime:observer_effect", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Mode, dose, or sequence -> basis and coupling; disagreement -> different disturbed measurements.", "slug": "observer_effect", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact measurement result and disturbance depend on measurement basis and coupling strength."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Measurements change when observation mode, dose, or sequence changes.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The intended observation could damage, exhaust, contaminate, expose, or destabilize the target.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Better observability usually requires stronger coupling to the target, while stronger coupling increases the chance that the observation changes what the observer wants to know. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: The intended observation could damage, exhaust, contaminate, expose, or destabilize the target. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The intended observation could damage, exhaust, contaminate, expose, or destabilize the target.", "Better observability usually requires stronger coupling to the target, while stronger coupling increases the chance that the observation changes what the observer wants to know."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The intended observation could damage, exhaust, contaminate, expose, or destabilize the target."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 44, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-044", "ledger_sha256": "eeb8a602a6457ebc37822f8c1fcd57a1a47508b650091865a1f96f0057c0c8b2"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Observer-Inclusive System Inquiry", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:observer_inclusive_system_inquiry", "slug": "observer_inclusive_system_inquiry"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 7, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 2, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 5, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 7 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 2 of 7 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 7}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system is being observed, evaluated, modeled, or controlled as if the observer were outside it, even though observer position, categories, access, instrumentation, authority, publication, or intervention shapes the data and changes participant behavior. First-order evidence may be accurate within its frame yet still produce false certainty, hidden exclusion, strategic response, performativity, or illegitimate control when the frame and observer-system relation remain unexamined.\n\n**Root tension:** Observation is necessary for knowledge and control, yet observation is itself a positioned, selective, consequential intervention inside the system.\n\n### Trigger Conditions\n\n- people change behavior because they know they are observed or governed\n- different observer positions produce stable but conflicting system descriptions\n- metrics, classifications, forecasts, or audits change incentives and future observability\n- affected parties dispute not only a conclusion but the categories and boundary used to produce it\n- a controller lacks local knowledge and participants adapt around the control rule\n- an observer has material power over access, resources, status, discipline, or publication\n- a model becomes self-fulfilling, self-defeating, gameable, stigmatizing, or obsolete through use\n- a system's identity or boundary is partly reproduced by observation and communication\n\n### Observable Symptoms\n\n- view-from-nowhere claims\n- unexplained frame sensitivity\n- Hawthorne or expectancy effects\n- observer disagreement hidden by aggregation\n- participant gaming or concealment\n- token consultation\n- model drift after deployment\n- surveillance asymmetry\n- reflexive critique with no changed practice\n- recursive review with no stopping rule\n\n### Anti-Signatures\n\n- the observer-system coupling is demonstrably negligible and the decision is low consequence\n- the problem is only instrument calibration or measurement traceability\n- the task is only self-monitoring by one actor\n- the issue is a formal self-reference contradiction requiring level separation\n- ordinary control has failed and the primary need is structural reconfiguration rather than reflexive inquiry", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system is being observed, evaluated, modeled, or controlled as if the observer were outside it, even though observer position, categories, access, instrumentation, authority, publication, or intervention shapes the data and changes participant behavior. First-order evidence may be accurate within its frame yet still produce false certainty, hidden exclusion, strategic response, performativity, or illegitimate control when the frame and observer-system relation remain unexamined."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires perceived audience presence to alter incentives and behavior through reputation.", "role_mapping": "Observer or governor -> audience; participant behavior -> public-private divergence.", "slug": "public_vs_private_contexts", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b044_a12_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: people change behavior because they know they are observed or governed. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["people change behavior because they know they are observed or governed"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Public vs. Private Contexts", "one_liner": "Audience presence alters motivation and behavior through reputation.", "page_ref": "prime:public_vs_private_contexts", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Observer or governor -> audience; participant behavior -> public-private divergence.", "slug": "public_vs_private_contexts", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires perceived audience presence to alter incentives and behavior through reputation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "People change behavior because they know an audience, observer, or governing actor is present.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A viewpoint fixes access and bias but one or several viewpoints need not produce stable conflict about the same system.", "slug": "viewpoint"}], "residual_id": "r:observer_inclusive_system_inquiry:b044_a12_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b044_a12_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: different observer positions produce stable but conflicting system descriptions. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["different observer positions produce stable but conflicting system descriptions"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A viewpoint fixes access and bias but one or several viewpoints need not produce stable conflict about the same system.", "slug": "viewpoint"}], "normalized_requirement": "Different observer positions produce stable but conflicting descriptions of the same system.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Different observer positions produce stable but conflicting descriptions of the same system.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A representation can alter system dynamics without changing incentives or the future observation surface.", "slug": "reflexivity_self_reference"}], "residual_id": "r:observer_inclusive_system_inquiry:b044_a12_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b044_a12_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Strong signals include observer-dependent descriptions, participant reactivity, metric gaming, contested categories, hidden surveillance power, model performativity, and adaptive response that changes future data. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Metrics, classifications, forecasts, or audits change incentives and future observability.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["metrics, classifications, forecasts, or audits change incentives and future observability", "Strong signals include observer-dependent descriptions, participant reactivity, metric gaming, contested categories, hidden surveillance power, model performativity, and adaptive response that changes future data."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A representation can alter system dynamics without changing incentives or the future observation surface.", "slug": "reflexivity_self_reference"}], "normalized_requirement": "Metrics, classifications, forecasts, or audits change incentives and future observability.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Metrics, classifications, forecasts, or audits change incentives and future observability.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Boundary critique can be conducted without affected-party dispute or a contested conclusion.", "slug": "boundary_critique"}], "residual_id": "r:observer_inclusive_system_inquiry:b044_a12_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b044_a12_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: affected parties dispute not only a conclusion but the categories and boundary used to produce it. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["affected parties dispute not only a conclusion but the categories and boundary used to produce it"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Boundary critique can be conducted without affected-party dispute or a contested conclusion.", "slug": "boundary_critique"}], "normalized_requirement": "Affected parties dispute both a conclusion and the categories or boundary used to produce it.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Affected parties dispute both a conclusion and the categories or boundary used to produce it.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B5", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Including the controller inside the model does not require it to lack local knowledge or participants to evade its rule.", "slug": "second_order_cybernetics_second_order_observation"}], "residual_id": "r:observer_inclusive_system_inquiry:b044_a12_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b044_a12_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: a controller lacks local knowledge and participants adapt around the control rule. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["a controller lacks local knowledge and participants adapt around the control rule"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Including the controller inside the model does not require it to lack local knowledge or participants to evade its rule.", "slug": "second_order_cybernetics_second_order_observation"}], "normalized_requirement": "A controller lacks local knowledge while participants adapt around its control rule.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A controller lacks local knowledge while participants adapt around its control rule.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 5", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B6", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires a representation or belief of system dynamics to feed back into and change those dynamics.", "role_mapping": "Model -> internal representation; use -> representation-mediated action; performativity -> changed modeled state.", "slug": "reflexivity_self_reference", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b044_a12_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A model becomes self-fulfilling, self-defeating, gameable, stigmatizing, or obsolete through use. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["a model becomes self-fulfilling, self-defeating, gameable, stigmatizing, or obsolete through use"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Reflexivity (Self-Reference)", "one_liner": "Self-referential systems.", "page_ref": "prime:reflexivity_self_reference", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Model -> internal representation; use -> representation-mediated action; performativity -> changed modeled state.", "slug": "reflexivity_self_reference", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires a representation or belief of system dynamics to feed back into and change those dynamics."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A model becomes self-fulfilling, self-defeating, gameable, stigmatizing, or obsolete through use.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 6", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B7", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Some second-order inquiries include the observer and analytically draw boundaries without requiring observation to reproduce system identity.", "slug": "second_order_cybernetics_second_order_observation"}], "residual_id": "r:observer_inclusive_system_inquiry:b044_a12_c8", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b044_a12_c8", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A system's identity or boundary is partly reproduced by observation and communication. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["a system's identity or boundary is partly reproduced by observation and communication"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Some second-order inquiries include the observer and analytically draw boundaries without requiring observation to reproduce system identity.", "slug": "second_order_cybernetics_second_order_observation"}], "normalized_requirement": "A system's identity or boundary is partly reproduced by observation and communication.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A system's identity or boundary is partly reproduced by observation and communication.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [8], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 7", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "DISJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "an observer has material power over access, resources, status, discipline, or publication.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system is being observed, evaluated, modeled, or controlled as if the observer were outside it, even though observer position, categories, access, instrumentation, authority, publication, or intervention shapes the data and changes participant behavior. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: an observer has material power over access, resources, status, discipline, or publication. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["an observer has material power over access, resources, status, discipline, or publication", "A system is being observed, evaluated, modeled, or controlled as if the observer were outside it, even though observer position, categories, access, instrumentation, authority, publication, or intervention shapes the data and changes participant behavior."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "an observer has material power over access, resources, status, discipline, or publication"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 44, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-044", "ledger_sha256": "eeb8a602a6457ebc37822f8c1fcd57a1a47508b650091865a1f96f0057c0c8b2"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Offline Replay Consolidation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:offline_replay_consolidation", "slug": "offline_replay_consolidation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Valuable experience passes through the system in a fragile form. The live event contains sequences, cues, errors, rewards, timing, and contingencies that could improve future memory or skill, but immediate conditions are too noisy, fast, risky, or interference-prone for the experience alone to become durable structure.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Valuable experience passes through the system in a fragile form. The live event contains sequences, cues, errors, rewards, timing, and contingencies that could improve future memory or skill, but immediate conditions are too noisy, fast, risky, or interference-prone for the experience alone to become durable structure."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record begins with an online phase that emits a captured sequence preserving temporal and causal order.", "role_mapping": "Live episode -> online phase; learnable structure -> sequence trace.", "slug": "replay", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b044_a13_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A live episode, practice attempt, incident, route, simulation run, decision path, or model trajectory contains learnable sequence structure. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A live episode, practice attempt, incident, route, simulation run, decision path, or model trajectory contains learnable sequence structure."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Replay", "one_liner": "After live experience, a system reactivates captured sequence-traces in a decoupled offline window, and that rerun — not the original experience alone — writes durable structure into memory or skill.", "page_ref": "prime:replay", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Live episode -> online phase; learnable structure -> sequence trace.", "slug": "replay", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record begins with an online phase that emits a captured sequence preserving temporal and causal order."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A live episode emits a learnable sequence trace.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A captured sequence with preserved order is mandatory so it can be re-presented later.", "role_mapping": "Capture or reconstruction -> stored trace; fidelity -> preserved temporal and causal order.", "slug": "replay", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b044_a13_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The system can capture or reconstruct the trace with enough fidelity to rerun what matters. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The system can capture or reconstruct the trace with enough fidelity to rerun what matters."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Replay", "one_liner": "After live experience, a system reactivates captured sequence-traces in a decoupled offline window, and that rerun — not the original experience alone — writes durable structure into memory or skill.", "page_ref": "prime:replay", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Capture or reconstruction -> stored trace; fidelity -> preserved temporal and causal order.", "slug": "replay", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A captured sequence with preserved order is mandatory so it can be re-presented later."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The sequence trace can be captured or reconstructed with enough fidelity to rerun what matters.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Replay can be used for efficiency or prioritization even when repeating the live event would be safe and practical.", "slug": "replay"}], "residual_id": "r:offline_replay_consolidation:b044_a13_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b044_a13_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Immediate repetition in the live environment would be costly, unsafe, impractical, or too contaminated by new input. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Immediate repetition in the live environment would be costly, unsafe, impractical, or too contaminated by new input."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Replay can be used for efficiency or prioritization even when repeating the live event would be safe and practical.", "slug": "replay"}], "normalized_requirement": "Immediate live repetition is costly, unsafe, impractical, or contaminated by new input.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Immediate live repetition is costly, unsafe, impractical, or contaminated by new input.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires an offline window decoupled from current input in which the captured sequence is rerun.", "role_mapping": "Post-experience window -> offline phase; rerun before displacement -> trace re-presentation.", "slug": "replay", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b044_a13_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A post-experience offline window exists or can be created before traces decay, fuse with interpretation, or are displaced by competing events. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A post-experience offline window exists or can be created before traces decay, fuse with interpretation, or are displaced by competing events."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Replay", "one_liner": "After live experience, a system reactivates captured sequence-traces in a decoupled offline window, and that rerun — not the original experience alone — writes durable structure into memory or skill.", "page_ref": "prime:replay", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Post-experience window -> offline phase; rerun before displacement -> trace re-presentation.", "slug": "replay", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires an offline window decoupled from current input in which the captured sequence is rerun."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A decoupled post-experience window can rerun the trace before it is lost or displaced.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The desired outcome is durable availability, better timing, improved policy, richer schema, or stronger future response rather than a one-time report.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The live event contains sequences, cues, errors, rewards, timing, and contingencies that could improve future memory or skill, but immediate conditions are too noisy, fast, risky, or interference-prone for the experience alone to become durable structure. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: The desired outcome is durable availability, better timing, improved policy, richer schema, or stronger future response rather than a one-time report. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The desired outcome is durable availability, better timing, improved policy, richer schema, or stronger future response rather than a one-time report.", "The live event contains sequences, cues, errors, rewards, timing, and contingencies that could improve future memory or skill, but immediate conditions are too noisy, fast, risky, or interference-prone for the experience alone to become durable structure."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The desired outcome is durable availability, better timing, improved policy, richer schema, or stronger future response rather than a one-time report."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 44, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-044", "ledger_sha256": "eeb8a602a6457ebc37822f8c1fcd57a1a47508b650091865a1f96f0057c0c8b2"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Ontology Clarification", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:ontology_clarification", "slug": "ontology_clarification"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 4, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 4 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is hidden ontology mismatch. People proceed as though the domain’s objects are obvious, but their assumptions differ. One person treats a customer as a payer, another as an end user, another as an account, and another as an organization. One system treats a case as a record, another as a household, another as an unresolved need.\n\nWhen this layer remains implicit, downstream artifacts inherit confusion. Metrics count the wrong object. Policies exclude edge cases. Data schemas cannot integrate. Product teams optimize workflows around entities that users do not recognize. Governance decisions look technical even when they depend on contested categories.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Actors use different assumptions about what the key entities are, how those entities are categorized, what relationships count, and where the domain boundary sits. Because the ontology remains implicit, later design, measurement, automation, or governance inherits hidden disagreement."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P086-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve one lexical form as the common label.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "One word or term is used within a shared discourse or system.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve multiplicity and referential difference, not harmless repeated use for one referent.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "That same word is applied to at least two distinct referents.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires the word to collapse distinct entities.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The distinct referents are different entities.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires the word to collapse distinct states.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The distinct referents are different states.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "The same word denotes different entities or different states.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "one word is used for distinct referents", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P086-C13-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A stable authoritative name can have one unambiguous referent and therefore does not entail multiple entities or states.", "slug": "naming_act_object"}], "residual_id": "r:ontology_clarification:b044_a14_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b044_a14_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A good signal is the sentence, “We are using the same word, but we do not mean the same thing.” Another signal is the opposite: two teams use different words but are actually referring to the same object, state, or relation. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The same word is used for different entities or states.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The same word is used for different entities or states.", "A good signal is the sentence, “We are using the same word, but we do not mean the same thing.” Another signal is the opposite: two teams use different words but are actually referring to the same object, state, or relation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A stable authoritative name can have one unambiguous referent and therefore does not entail multiple entities or states.", "slug": "naming_act_object"}], "normalized_requirement": "The same word is used for different entities or states.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The same word is used for different entities or states.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact record requires incompatible models of one referent, but the disagreement can concern quantities or causal state rather than category membership.", "slug": "inconsistent_shared_model"}], "residual_id": "r:ontology_clarification:b044_a14_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b044_a14_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Different systems or teams classify the same case differently. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Different systems or teams classify the same case differently."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact record requires incompatible models of one referent, but the disagreement can concern quantities or causal state rather than category membership.", "slug": "inconsistent_shared_model"}], "normalized_requirement": "Different systems or teams assign the same case to different categories.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Different systems or teams assign the same case to different categories.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A completed ontology explicitly supplies membership and identity criteria and need not begin from unclear boundaries.", "slug": "ontology"}], "residual_id": "r:ontology_clarification:b044_a14_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b044_a14_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Metrics, policies, or workflows depend on categories whose boundaries are unclear. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Metrics, policies, or workflows depend on categories whose boundaries are unclear."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A completed ontology explicitly supplies membership and identity criteria and need not begin from unclear boundaries.", "slug": "ontology"}], "normalized_requirement": "Metrics, policies, or workflows rely on categories whose membership boundaries are unclear.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Metrics, policies, or workflows rely on categories whose membership boundaries are unclear.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Ontological work can concern clear descriptive categories without edge cases or concealed normative consequences.", "slug": "ontology"}], "residual_id": "r:ontology_clarification:b044_a14_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b044_a14_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Edge cases reveal that the current vocabulary is doing hidden normative or operational work. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Edge cases reveal that the current vocabulary is doing hidden normative or operational work."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Ontological work can concern clear descriptive categories without edge cases or concealed normative consequences.", "slug": "ontology"}], "normalized_requirement": "Edge cases reveal that vocabulary is carrying hidden normative or operational consequences.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Edge cases reveal that vocabulary is carrying hidden normative or operational consequences.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "DISJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A planned system needs a stable model before implementation.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Action requires a stable enough model of what exists, but complex domains contain contested categories, evolving entities, and multiple valid perspectives. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: A planned system needs a stable model before implementation. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A planned system needs a stable model before implementation.", "Action requires a stable enough model of what exists, but complex domains contain contested categories, evolving entities, and multiple valid perspectives."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "A planned system needs a stable model before implementation."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 44, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-044", "ledger_sha256": "eeb8a602a6457ebc37822f8c1fcd57a1a47508b650091865a1f96f0057c0c8b2"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Open Reuse Publication Infrastructure", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:open_reuse_publication_infrastructure", "slug": "open_reuse_publication_infrastructure"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 3, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 3 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 1 of 3 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Many artifacts are potentially reusable, but their reuse depends on private context. The producer knows where the current version lives, what the artifact means, whether it may be copied, which fields are stable, who maintains it, what changed, and what caveats matter. A stranger or downstream system does not. Without an explicit publication infrastructure, each reuse requires a new explanation, legal review, data-cleaning effort, schema interpretation, or integration meeting.\n\nThis problem appears whenever an artifact could become shared infrastructure but remains trapped inside local knowledge. Public access alone does not solve it. A document can be public and still unusable; a dataset can be downloadable and still legally ambiguous; an API can be reachable and still brittle; an open repository can still be unmaintained.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A community owns or produces an artifact that could support broader interoperability, but outside users cannot reliably find it, know whether they may reuse it, parse it automatically, identify the correct version, understand its scope, verify its provenance, or receive change signals. Reuse therefore depends on private contacts, manual explanation, ad hoc translation, or risky copying."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires assembling many independent exclusion consents at super-linear transaction cost, causing productive reuse to fail.", "role_mapping": "Artifact rights -> fragmented exclusion rights; per-use permission -> consent assembly; non-scaling -> super-linear transaction cost.", "slug": "anti_commons_tragedy", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b044_a15_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Per-use negotiation would not scale. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Per-use negotiation would not scale"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Anti-Commons Tragedy", "one_liner": "A resource is systematically under-used because too many independent agents each hold a right to exclude and assembling their consents is too costly, so the resource sits idle even though every party would benefit from putting it to use — the formal dual of the commons.", "page_ref": "prime:anti_commons_tragedy", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Artifact rights -> fragmented exclusion rights; per-use permission -> consent assembly; non-scaling -> super-linear transaction cost.", "slug": "anti_commons_tragedy", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires assembling many independent exclusion consents at super-linear transaction cost, causing productive reuse to fail."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Negotiating permission separately for each reuse would not scale.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P086-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an artifact, reuse relation, and prospective adopter.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A prospective adopter considers reusing an artifact.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve uncertainty about reuse rights rather than a definite prohibition or grant.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Whether the adopter may reuse the artifact is uncertain.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail uncertainty as the cause of non-adoption, not merely co-occurrence.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The rights uncertainty blocks adoption of the artifact.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Uncertainty about an artifact's reuse rights blocks adoption by prospective reusers.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "reuse-rights uncertainty blocks adoption", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P086-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid open-publication instance has a clear open license and therefore has the opposite rights state.", "slug": "open_publication_for_interoperability"}], "residual_id": "r:open_reuse_publication_infrastructure:b044_a15_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b044_a15_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Rights uncertainty blocks adoption. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Rights uncertainty blocks adoption"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid open-publication instance has a clear open license and therefore has the opposite rights state.", "slug": "open_publication_for_interoperability"}], "normalized_requirement": "Unclear reuse rights block adoption.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Unclear reuse rights block adoption.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P086-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the versioned artifact and downstream dependency roles.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Downstream reusers depend on a versioned artifact.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve version drift rather than ordinary planned versioning with synchronized adoption.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Versions of the artifact drift or diverge over time or across publication points.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the drift-to-risk direction and downstream bearer of the risk.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The version drift creates dependency risk for downstream reusers.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve risk modality without strengthening it to certain breakage.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The consequence is dependency risk rather than guaranteed dependency failure.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "Version drift in a reusable artifact creates dependency risk for downstream reusers.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "version drift creates downstream dependency risk", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P086-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A versioned artifact can manage and announce change without drift or dependency failure.", "slug": "versioning"}], "residual_id": "r:open_reuse_publication_infrastructure:b044_a15_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b044_a15_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Version drift creates dependency risk. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Version drift creates dependency risk"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A versioned artifact can manage and announce change without drift or dependency failure.", "slug": "versioning"}], "normalized_requirement": "Version drift creates dependency risk for downstream reusers.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Version drift creates dependency risk for downstream reusers.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "External reuse is intended or strategically valuable.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: External reuse is intended or strategically valuable. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["External reuse is intended or strategically valuable"]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "External reuse is intended or strategically valuable"}, {"display_text": "The artifact must be reused by machines as well as people.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: The artifact must be reused by machines as well as people. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The artifact must be reused by machines as well as people"]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "The artifact must be reused by machines as well as people"}, {"display_text": "Publication affects trust and accountability.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Publication affects trust and accountability. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Publication affects trust and accountability"]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Publication affects trust and accountability"}, {"display_text": "The artifact crosses community or domain boundaries.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A community owns or produces an artifact that could support broader interoperability, but outside users cannot reliably find it, know whether they may reuse it, parse it automatically, identify the correct version, understand its scope, verify its provenance, or receive change signals. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The artifact crosses community or domain boundaries. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The artifact crosses community or domain boundaries", "A community owns or produces an artifact that could support broader interoperability, but outside users cannot reliably find it, know whether they may reuse it, parse it automatically, identify the correct version, understand its scope, verify its provenance, or receive change signals."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "The artifact crosses community or domain boundaries"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 44, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-044", "ledger_sha256": "eeb8a602a6457ebc37822f8c1fcd57a1a47508b650091865a1f96f0057c0c8b2"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Operating-Principle Substitution", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:operating_principle_substitution", "slug": "operating_principle_substitution"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 2 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 2}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A required function remains valid, but the mechanical, electrical, magnetic, optical, acoustic, thermal, fluidic, chemical, computational, or hybrid principle used to deliver it imposes an intrinsic limit that same-principle optimization cannot adequately remove.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "The incumbent causal modality imposes an intrinsic recurring limit on a still-required function, and optimization within that modality cannot remove the limit."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "This branch preserves the complete remedy-free diagnostic route; goals, feasibility clauses, gates, deployment constraints, and supporting context remain outside the DNF."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "EXT001-C070", "dnf": [["EXT001-U070-O1"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"obligation_id": "EXT001-U070-O1", "predicate": "The incumbent causal modality creates a hard or recurring performance limit."}], "predicate": "The incumbent causal modality creates a hard or recurring performance limit.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "The incumbent causal modality creates a hard or recurring performance limit.", "unit_id": "EXT001-U070"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"catalog_exhaustion": "CONDITION_LEVEL", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The incumbent causal modality creates a hard or recurring performance limit.", "slug": "regression_to_the_mean"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The incumbent causal modality creates a hard or recurring performance limit.", "slug": "causality"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The incumbent causal modality creates a hard or recurring performance limit.", "slug": "disruptive_innovation"}], "residual_id": "EXT001:operating_principle_substitution:C02", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding."}}, "condition_id": "ext001_operating_principle_substitution_a02", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The incumbent principle creates a hard or recurring limit in wear, friction, inertia, contamination, speed, control, range, scaling, access, heat, or noise. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The incumbent principle creates a hard or recurring limit in wear, friction, inertia, contamination, speed, control, range, scaling, access, heat, or noise."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The incumbent causal modality creates a hard or recurring performance limit.", "slug": "regression_to_the_mean"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The incumbent causal modality creates a hard or recurring performance limit.", "slug": "causality"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The incumbent causal modality creates a hard or recurring performance limit.", "slug": "disruptive_innovation"}], "normalized_requirement": "The incumbent causal modality creates a hard or recurring performance limit.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The incumbent causal modality creates a hard or recurring performance limit.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "EXT001-C071", "dnf": [["EXT001-U071-O1"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"obligation_id": "EXT001-U071-O1", "predicate": "Evidence distinguishes an intrinsic modality limit from poor implementation, maintenance, calibration, or interface design."}], "predicate": "Evidence distinguishes an intrinsic modality limit from poor implementation, maintenance, calibration, or interface design.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Evidence distinguishes an intrinsic modality limit from poor implementation, maintenance, calibration, or interface design.", "unit_id": "EXT001-U071"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"catalog_exhaustion": "CONDITION_LEVEL", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Evidence distinguishes an intrinsic modality limit from poor implementation, maintenance, calibration, or interface design.", "slug": "representational_modality"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Evidence distinguishes an intrinsic modality limit from poor implementation, maintenance, calibration, or interface design.", "slug": "epistemic_humility"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Evidence distinguishes an intrinsic modality limit from poor implementation, maintenance, calibration, or interface design.", "slug": "intrinsic_ceiling_vs_input"}], "residual_id": "EXT001:operating_principle_substitution:C03", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding."}}, "condition_id": "ext001_operating_principle_substitution_a03", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The incumbent principle is familiar, direct, and supported but intrinsically limited; an alternate modality can remove that limit while introducing conversion burden, dependencies, unfamiliar hazards, and transition risk. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Evidence distinguishes an intrinsic modality limit from poor implementation, maintenance, calibration, or interface design.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Evidence distinguishes an intrinsic modality limit from poor implementation, maintenance, calibration, or interface design.", "The incumbent principle is familiar, direct, and supported but intrinsically limited; an alternate modality can remove that limit while introducing conversion burden, dependencies, unfamiliar hazards, and transition risk."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Evidence distinguishes an intrinsic modality limit from poor implementation, maintenance, calibration, or interface design.", "slug": "representational_modality"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Evidence distinguishes an intrinsic modality limit from poor implementation, maintenance, calibration, or interface design.", "slug": "epistemic_humility"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Evidence distinguishes an intrinsic modality limit from poor implementation, maintenance, calibration, or interface design.", "slug": "intrinsic_ceiling_vs_input"}], "normalized_requirement": "Evidence distinguishes an intrinsic modality limit from poor implementation, maintenance, calibration, or interface design.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Evidence distinguishes an intrinsic modality limit from poor implementation, maintenance, calibration, or interface design.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The required function can be stated independently of the incumbent mechanism.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A required function remains valid, but the mechanical, electrical, magnetic, optical, acoustic, thermal, fluidic, chemical, computational, or hybrid principle used to deliver it imposes an intrinsic limit that same-principle optimization cannot adequately remove. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The required function can be stated independently of the incumbent mechanism. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The required function can be stated independently of the incumbent mechanism.", "A required function remains valid, but the mechanical, electrical, magnetic, optical, acoustic, thermal, fluidic, chemical, computational, or hybrid principle used to deliver it imposes an intrinsic limit that same-principle optimization cannot adequately remove."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "The required function can be stated independently of the incumbent mechanism."}, {"display_text": "An alternate causal modality can satisfy the protected function.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The incumbent principle is familiar, direct, and supported but intrinsically limited; an alternate modality can remove that limit while introducing conversion burden, dependencies, unfamiliar hazards, and transition risk. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: An alternate causal modality can satisfy the protected function. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["At least one alternate causal modality can satisfy the protected function.", "The incumbent principle is familiar, direct, and supported but intrinsically limited; an alternate modality can remove that limit while introducing conversion burden, dependencies, unfamiliar hazards, and transition risk."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "An alternate causal modality can satisfy the protected function."}, {"display_text": "Transduction, power, command, interfaces, fallback, and transition can be governed.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: Transduction, power, command, interfaces, fallback, and transition can be governed. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Transduction, power, command, interfaces, fallback, and transition can be governed."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Transduction, power, command, interfaces, fallback, and transition can be governed."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"candidate_ledger_sha256": "96f72d2139077fd57bf795048ebef33b3fd574b20963170080ec916b5b3b92fe", "extension_id": "new-archetypes-extension-001", "ledger_id": "prime-production-v1.2-extension-001", "ledger_sha256": "9644520614744632d1d36da44b1acd77ce432852c6083eb871203521c166efce"}, "base_projection_sha256": "841e0c7f3cb8e8054475ad29a8a14745a416b4fc115559a44878b94292e673ec", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "ca09ed9fe1598ce7072755b530de5553f5ee0a7cd64ae82d9e4a4e2149a37788", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Operation-Weighted Data Structure Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:operation_weighted_data_structure_design", "slug": "operation_weighted_data_structure_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 5 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system holds information in a form that does not match how the information is actually used. Important operations require scanning, conversion, joining, manual reconstruction, repeated computation, or fragile workarounds, while hidden costs accumulate in updates, storage, consistency, and maintenance.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system holds information in a form that does not match how the information is actually used. Important operations require scanning, conversion, joining, manual reconstruction, repeated computation, or fragile workarounds, while hidden costs accumulate in updates, storage, consistency, and maintenance."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Every data structure has an operation profile, but a valid instance need not face repeated demand for one operation.", "slug": "data_structure"}], "residual_id": "r:operation_weighted_data_structure_design:b045_a01_c1", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b045_a01_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Users or algorithms repeatedly perform the same retrieval, traversal, grouping, joining, ordering, comparison, or update operation. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Users or algorithms repeatedly perform the same retrieval, traversal, grouping, joining, ordering, comparison, or update operation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Every data structure has an operation profile, but a valid instance need not face repeated demand for one operation.", "slug": "data_structure"}], "normalized_requirement": "Users or algorithms repeatedly perform the same access or update operation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Users or algorithms repeatedly perform the same access or update operation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A data structure can remain well matched to its workload and need not have drifted from a capture layout.", "slug": "data_structure"}], "residual_id": "r:operation_weighted_data_structure_design:b045_a01_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b045_a01_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A representation that was convenient for initial capture has become expensive for ongoing use. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A representation that was convenient for initial capture has become expensive for ongoing use."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A data structure can remain well matched to its workload and need not have drifted from a capture layout.", "slug": "data_structure"}], "normalized_requirement": "A capture-convenient representation has become expensive for ongoing use.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A capture-convenient representation has become expensive for ongoing use.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A data structure trades operation costs even for one consumer with one stable access profile.", "slug": "data_structure"}], "residual_id": "r:operation_weighted_data_structure_design:b045_a01_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b045_a01_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Different consumers need incompatible access patterns from the same information. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Different consumers need incompatible access patterns from the same information."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A data structure trades operation costs even for one consumer with one stable access profile.", "slug": "data_structure"}], "normalized_requirement": "Consumers require incompatible access patterns from the same information.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Consumers require incompatible access patterns from the same information.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A rate-limiting stage need not arise from information layout or combine correctness and maintenance failures.", "slug": "bottleneck"}], "residual_id": "r:operation_weighted_data_structure_design:b045_a01_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b045_a01_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Performance, correctness, or maintainability problems cluster around the same structural bottleneck. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Performance, correctness, or maintainability problems cluster around the same structural bottleneck."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A rate-limiting stage need not arise from information layout or combine correctness and maintenance failures.", "slug": "bottleneck"}], "normalized_requirement": "Performance, correctness, or maintenance failures cluster at one structural bottleneck.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Performance, correctness, or maintenance failures cluster at one structural bottleneck.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The no-neutral-arrangement invariant requires every layout to privilege some operations structurally at the cost of others.", "role_mapping": "Information layout -> arrangement; cheapened operation -> privileged access; worsened operation or invariant -> structural penalty.", "slug": "data_structure", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b045_a01_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A proposed optimization would make one operation cheaper while plausibly making another operation worse. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A proposed optimization would make one operation cheaper while plausibly making another operation worse."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Data Structure", "one_liner": "An arrangement of information that makes some operations cheap at the structural cost of others.", "page_ref": "prime:data_structure", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Information layout -> arrangement; cheapened operation -> privileged access; worsened operation or invariant -> structural penalty.", "slug": "data_structure", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The no-neutral-arrangement invariant requires every layout to privilege some operations structurally at the cost of others."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Making one information operation cheaper makes at least one other operation or maintained invariant more costly.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The system is scaling in data volume, operation frequency, concurrency, latency sensitivity, or dependency count.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The system is scaling in data volume, operation frequency, concurrency, latency sensitivity, or dependency count. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The system is scaling in data volume, operation frequency, concurrency, latency sensitivity, or dependency count."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "The system is scaling in data volume, operation frequency, concurrency, latency sensitivity, or dependency count."}, {"display_text": "The team cannot explain why the current layout is the right one for the workload.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The team cannot explain why the current layout is the right one for the workload. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The team cannot explain why the current layout is the right one for the workload."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "The team cannot explain why the current layout is the right one for the workload."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 45, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-045", "ledger_sha256": "a59d7b1f99e10f7a31bbac9647e3780ac8a70c2b121adb7cb94aff52d5ff77fc"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Operational Context Validation Testing", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:operational_context_validation_testing", "slug": "operational_context_validation_testing"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system has been validated against simplified, controlled, simulated, or laboratory conditions, but its real-world deployment environment contains contextual variables that can alter behavior, usability, safety, reliability, interpretation, or acceptance.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system has been validated against simplified, controlled, simulated, or laboratory conditions, but its real-world deployment environment contains contextual variables that can alter behavior, usability, safety, reliability, interpretation, or acceptance."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The condition does not require a successful curated pilot, heterogeneous scale distribution, or resource-intensity gap.", "slug": "pilot_to_scale_transition"}], "residual_id": "r:operational_context_validation_testing:b045_a02_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b045_a02_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A solution is moving from lab, prototype, pilot, model, or controlled test into field deployment. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A solution is moving from lab, prototype, pilot, model, or controlled test into field deployment."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The condition does not require a successful curated pilot, heterogeneous scale distribution, or resource-intensity gap.", "slug": "pilot_to_scale_transition"}], "normalized_requirement": "A solution is moving from a controlled preparation setting into field deployment.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A solution is moving from a controlled preparation setting into field deployment.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record defines adequacy by whether a declared outcome is produced in context, leaving realization form open.", "role_mapping": "Success -> adequacy; actual use context -> outcome context; abstract requirement -> open realization.", "slug": "outcome_defined_adequacy", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b045_a02_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Requirements are written abstractly but success depends on actual context of use. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Requirements are written abstractly but success depends on actual context of use."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Outcome-Defined Adequacy", "one_liner": "Adequacy is specified by whether a defined outcome is produced in context, leaving the form open to any realization that achieves it.", "page_ref": "prime:outcome_defined_adequacy", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Success -> adequacy; actual use context -> outcome context; abstract requirement -> open realization.", "slug": "outcome_defined_adequacy", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record defines adequacy by whether a declared outcome is produced in context, leaving realization form open."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Success is defined by outcomes in the actual context of use rather than by abstract conformance alone.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires a curated pilot niche whose evidence is insufficient for a heterogeneous scaled distribution.", "role_mapping": "Prior test -> pilot niche; field context -> scaled distribution; simplification -> selection and support differential.", "slug": "pilot_to_scale_transition", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b045_a02_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Prior tests used clean data, controlled timing, trained operators, ideal infrastructure, or simplified scenarios. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Prior tests used clean data, controlled timing, trained operators, ideal infrastructure, or simplified scenarios."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Pilot To Scale Transition", "one_liner": "An effect proven in a curated niche need not survive the heterogeneous distribution of scale.", "page_ref": "prime:pilot_to_scale_transition", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Prior test -> pilot niche; field context -> scaled distribution; simplification -> selection and support differential.", "slug": "pilot_to_scale_transition", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires a curated pilot niche whose evidence is insufficient for a heterogeneous scaled distribution."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Prior validation used a curated or simplified setting rather than the heterogeneous deployment distribution.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The operating environment includes real users, physical conditions, legacy systems, local workflows, variable load, or institutional constraints.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system has been validated against simplified, controlled, simulated, or laboratory conditions, but its real-world deployment environment contains contextual variables that can alter behavior, usability, safety, reliability, interpretation, or acceptance. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The operating environment includes real users, physical conditions, legacy systems, local workflows, variable load, or institutional constraints. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The operating environment includes real users, physical conditions, legacy systems, local workflows, variable load, or institutional constraints.", "A system has been validated against simplified, controlled, simulated, or laboratory conditions, but its real-world deployment environment contains contextual variables that can alter behavior, usability, safety, reliability, interpretation, or acceptance."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "The operating environment includes real users, physical conditions, legacy systems, local workflows, variable load, or institutional constraints."}, {"display_text": "Failure in deployment would be costly, unsafe, hard to reverse, reputationally damaging, or scientifically misleading.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Failure in deployment would be costly, unsafe, hard to reverse, reputationally damaging, or scientifically misleading. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Failure in deployment would be costly, unsafe, hard to reverse, reputationally damaging, or scientifically misleading."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Failure in deployment would be costly, unsafe, hard to reverse, reputationally damaging, or scientifically misleading."}, {"display_text": "Stakeholders disagree about whether lab evidence generalizes to field conditions.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Stakeholders disagree about whether lab evidence generalizes to field conditions. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders disagree about whether lab evidence generalizes to field conditions."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Stakeholders disagree about whether lab evidence generalizes to field conditions."}, {"display_text": "The deployment context can be observed, simulated with high fidelity, staged, shadowed, or piloted without unacceptable risk.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system has been validated against simplified, controlled, simulated, or laboratory conditions, but its real-world deployment environment contains contextual variables that can alter behavior, usability, safety, reliability, interpretation, or acceptance. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: The deployment context can be observed, simulated with high fidelity, staged, shadowed, or piloted without unacceptable risk. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The deployment context can be observed, simulated with high fidelity, staged, shadowed, or piloted without unacceptable risk.", "A system has been validated against simplified, controlled, simulated, or laboratory conditions, but its real-world deployment environment contains contextual variables that can alter behavior, usability, safety, reliability, interpretation, or acceptance."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "The deployment context can be observed, simulated with high fidelity, staged, shadowed, or piloted without unacceptable risk."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 45, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-045", "ledger_sha256": "a59d7b1f99e10f7a31bbac9647e3780ac8a70c2b121adb7cb94aff52d5ff77fc"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Operational Envelope Pacing", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:operational_envelope_pacing", "slug": "operational_envelope_pacing"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system pushes activities, coverage, commitments, deployments, or strategic reach outward faster than the sustaining backbone can support, control, repair, supervise, or learn from the expanded frontier.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system pushes activities, coverage, commitments, deployments, or strategic reach outward faster than the sustaining backbone can support, control, repair, supervise, or learn from the expanded frontier."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record's load-bearing variable is frontier demand outrunning backbone supply.", "role_mapping": "Operational reach -> frontier; sustaining capacity -> backbone; unequal growth -> demand-supply ratio deterioration.", "slug": "operational_overextension", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b045_a03_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Support, supervision, repair, quality assurance, training, governance, observability, or recovery capacity grows more slowly than reach. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Support, supervision, repair, quality assurance, training, governance, observability, or recovery capacity grows more slowly than reach."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Operational Overextension", "one_liner": "A system advances a frontier of activity faster than the supporting backbone that sustains it can keep up, so the leading edge becomes brittle and fails on its next shock — the failure lying in the frontier-to-backbone ratio, not the frontier itself.", "page_ref": "prime:operational_overextension", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Operational reach -> frontier; sustaining capacity -> backbone; unequal growth -> demand-supply ratio deterioration.", "slug": "operational_overextension", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record's load-bearing variable is frontier demand outrunning backbone supply."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Support, control, repair, learning, or recovery capacity grows more slowly than operational reach.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Overextension can be correctly measured and knowingly accepted; leader discounting is not mandatory.", "slug": "operational_overextension"}], "residual_id": "r:operational_envelope_pacing:b045_a03_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b045_a03_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Leaders count visible footprint while discounting hidden support debt, control debt, escalation debt, and learning debt. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Leaders count visible footprint while discounting hidden support debt, control debt, escalation debt, and learning debt."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Overextension can be correctly measured and knowingly accepted; leader discounting is not mandatory.", "slug": "operational_overextension"}], "normalized_requirement": "Leaders count visible reach while discounting hidden support, control, escalation, and learning debt.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Leaders count visible reach while discounting hidden support, control, escalation, and learning debt.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P087-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve frontier teams as the actors and improvisation as the demanded activity.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Teams operating at an organizational or operational frontier are asked to improvise.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail inadequate support, not merely that the support has a finite amount.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The selected sustaining support is insufficient for that improvisation.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires insufficient authority for frontier improvisation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The insufficient support is authority.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires insufficient staffing for frontier improvisation.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The insufficient support is staffing.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires insufficient tooling for frontier improvisation.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The insufficient support is tooling.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires insufficient local buffer capacity for frontier improvisation.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The insufficient support is local buffers.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires an insufficient recovery path for frontier improvisation.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The insufficient support is a recovery path.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Frontier teams are required to improvise without enough of one listed sustaining support.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "frontier teams improvise without sufficient sustaining support", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P087-C01-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Delegated intent can provide adequate authority and does not entail staffing or recovery deficit.", "slug": "mission_command"}], "residual_id": "r:operational_envelope_pacing:b045_a03_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b045_a03_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Edge teams are asked to improvise without enough authority, staffing, tooling, local buffers, or recovery paths. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Edge teams are asked to improvise without enough authority, staffing, tooling, local buffers, or recovery paths."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Frontline improvisation with adequate pre-positioned authority and a timely escalation path would not instantiate the candidate's rule-grain pathology or this unit.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Rules-of-Engagement Ambiguity", "one_liner": "Diagnose frontline breakdown under time pressure as a grain mismatch — decision rules written coarser than the environment generates choice points — paid out of a finite discretion budget, relocating the fix from the operator's judgment to the rule, escalation path, and pre-positioned authority.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:rules_of_engagement_ambiguity", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "rules_of_engagement_ambiguity"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "rules_of_engagement_ambiguity", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P087-C01-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record entails the authority branch: frontline actors must improvise across underspecified choice points without sufficient timely authority support."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Frontier teams improvise without sufficient authority, staffing, tooling, buffer, or recovery path.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime requires a shock distribution and absent margin, not an inference from normal-state evidence.", "slug": "operational_overextension"}], "residual_id": "r:operational_envelope_pacing:b045_a03_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b045_a03_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Shock tolerance is inferred from normal-state performance rather than from stress-tested backbone capacity. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Shock tolerance is inferred from normal-state performance rather than from stress-tested backbone capacity."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime requires a shock distribution and absent margin, not an inference from normal-state evidence.", "slug": "operational_overextension"}], "normalized_requirement": "Shock tolerance is inferred from normal-state performance rather than stress-tested backbone margin.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Shock tolerance is inferred from normal-state performance rather than stress-tested backbone margin.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact record can lack controlled retreat for technical reasons without political or emotional reluctance.", "slug": "operational_overextension"}], "residual_id": "r:operational_envelope_pacing:b045_a03_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b045_a03_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Retreat is politically or emotionally harder than continuing an unsafe advance. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Retreat is politically or emotionally harder than continuing an unsafe advance."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact record can lack controlled retreat for technical reasons without political or emotional reluctance.", "slug": "operational_overextension"}], "normalized_requirement": "Political or emotional cost makes controlled retreat harder than unsafe continuation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Political or emotional cost makes controlled retreat harder than unsafe continuation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Expansion pressure, urgency, competitive momentum, mission ambition, or political mandate rewards visible frontier growth.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Without ratio discipline, success metrics reward the frontier while the failure point migrates into support, control, repair, and recovery functions. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Expansion pressure, urgency, competitive momentum, mission ambition, or political mandate rewards visible frontier growth. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Expansion pressure, urgency, competitive momentum, mission ambition, or political mandate rewards visible frontier growth.", "Without ratio discipline, success metrics reward the frontier while the failure point migrates into support, control, repair, and recovery functions."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "Expansion pressure, urgency, competitive momentum, mission ambition, or political mandate rewards visible frontier growth."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 45, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-045", "ledger_sha256": "a59d7b1f99e10f7a31bbac9647e3780ac8a70c2b121adb7cb94aff52d5ff77fc"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Opinion Climate Recalibration Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:opinion_climate_recalibration_design", "slug": "opinion_climate_recalibration_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A public, group, team, audience, platform segment, or institution relies on visible expression to infer what people believe. Because dissenting or minority expression is perceived as isolating or costly, many people suppress it. Their silence then becomes part of the public evidence others use, making the apparent consensus look stronger than the private distribution and further raising the threshold for speech.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A public, group, team, audience, platform segment, or institution relies on visible expression to infer what people believe. Because dissenting or minority expression is perceived as isolating or costly, many people suppress it. Their silence then becomes part of the public evidence others use, making the apparent consensus look stronger than the private distribution and further raising the threshold for speech."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires an endogenous climate estimator built from visible expression.", "role_mapping": "Public sensor -> climate estimator; visible speech -> expressed-opinion input.", "slug": "spiral_of_silence", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b045_a04_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Visible expression is used as the public opinion sensor. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Visible expression is used as the public opinion sensor"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Spiral Of Silence In Publics", "one_liner": "A self-reinforcing loop in which people infer the climate of opinion from visible expression and those who believe themselves in the minority suppress their own, steepening the apparent consensus away from the underlying private distribution.", "page_ref": "prime:spiral_of_silence", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Public sensor -> climate estimator; visible speech -> expressed-opinion input.", "slug": "spiral_of_silence", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires an endogenous climate estimator built from visible expression."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Visible expression serves as the public sensor for the distribution of opinion.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A costly-display gate suppresses expression when a person believes their position is in the minority.", "role_mapping": "Isolation or punishment -> anticipated social cost; minority expression -> gated display.", "slug": "spiral_of_silence", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b045_a04_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: People believe minority expression can produce isolation or punishment. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["People believe minority expression can produce isolation or punishment"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Spiral Of Silence In Publics", "one_liner": "A self-reinforcing loop in which people infer the climate of opinion from visible expression and those who believe themselves in the minority suppress their own, steepening the apparent consensus away from the underlying private distribution.", "page_ref": "prime:spiral_of_silence", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Isolation or punishment -> anticipated social cost; minority expression -> gated display.", "slug": "spiral_of_silence", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A costly-display gate suppresses expression when a person believes their position is in the minority."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "People anticipate isolation or punishment when expressing a perceived-minority position.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Suppression necessarily decouples observable expression from the underlying private distribution.", "role_mapping": "Private beliefs -> private positions; public statements -> visible expression; difference -> suppression distortion.", "slug": "spiral_of_silence", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b045_a04_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Private distribution may differ from public expression. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Private distribution may differ from public expression"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Spiral Of Silence In Publics", "one_liner": "A self-reinforcing loop in which people infer the climate of opinion from visible expression and those who believe themselves in the minority suppress their own, steepening the apparent consensus away from the underlying private distribution.", "page_ref": "prime:spiral_of_silence", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Private beliefs -> private positions; public statements -> visible expression; difference -> suppression distortion.", "slug": "spiral_of_silence", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Suppression necessarily decouples observable expression from the underlying private distribution."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The private opinion distribution differs from the distribution visible in public expression.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The positive-feedback invariant raises the expected cost of dissent as silence steepens apparent consensus.", "role_mapping": "Apparent climate -> perceived majority; willingness -> suppression response.", "slug": "spiral_of_silence", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b045_a04_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The apparent climate affects future willingness to speak. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The apparent climate affects future willingness to speak"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Spiral Of Silence In Publics", "one_liner": "A self-reinforcing loop in which people infer the climate of opinion from visible expression and those who believe themselves in the minority suppress their own, steepening the apparent consensus away from the underlying private distribution.", "page_ref": "prime:spiral_of_silence", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Apparent climate -> perceived majority; willingness -> suppression response.", "slug": "spiral_of_silence", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The positive-feedback invariant raises the expected cost of dissent as silence steepens apparent consensus."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The apparent opinion climate changes subsequent willingness to speak.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The silence loop affects consequential decisions or norms.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The silence loop affects consequential decisions or norms. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The silence loop affects consequential decisions or norms"]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The silence loop affects consequential decisions or norms"}, {"display_text": "Direct exposure of minority voices would be risky or unreliable.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this deployment constraint: Direct exposure of minority voices would be risky or unreliable. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Direct exposure of minority voices would be risky or unreliable"]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Direct exposure of minority voices would be risky or unreliable"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 45, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-045", "ledger_sha256": "a59d7b1f99e10f7a31bbac9647e3780ac8a70c2b121adb7cb94aff52d5ff77fc"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Opponent-Channel Regulation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:opponent_channel_regulation", "slug": "opponent_channel_regulation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 5, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system must respond with enough force, speed, or sensitivity to matter, but unopposed activation creates runaway behavior while unopposed restraint creates paralysis, insensitivity, or loss of useful signal. Simple averaging, delayed correction, or general balance rules are too slow or too coarse because shaping must occur at the same local output surface where action is generated.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system must respond with enough force, speed, or sensitivity to matter, but unopposed activation creates runaway behavior while unopposed restraint creates paralysis, insensitivity, or loss of useful signal. Simple averaging, delayed correction, or general balance rules are too slow or too coarse because shaping must occur at the same local output surface where action is generated."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record combines high gain with catastrophic runaway when the suppressing channel is lost.", "role_mapping": "Responsiveness -> high gain; runaway -> selective loss of inhibition.", "slug": "excitation_inhibition_balance", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b045_a05_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The system needs high-gain responsiveness but cannot tolerate runaway activation, overshoot, excessive spread, or uncontrolled escalation. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The system needs high-gain responsiveness but cannot tolerate runaway activation, overshoot, excessive spread, or uncontrolled escalation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Excitation-Inhibition Balance", "one_liner": "Two opposed channels run concurrently and sum at every locus, so the system's output is the difference of two large quantities — high-gain, sharply tunable, and catastrophic to lose either side.", "page_ref": "prime:excitation_inhibition_balance", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Responsiveness -> high gain; runaway -> selective loss of inhibition.", "slug": "excitation_inhibition_balance", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record combines high gain with catastrophic runaway when the suppressing channel is lost."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "High-gain response is required, while loss of restraint would cause runaway, overshoot, or spread.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Both opposite-signed channels are concurrently active and combined at every decision locus.", "role_mapping": "Local unit -> locus; enablement -> excitation; constraint -> inhibition.", "slug": "excitation_inhibition_balance", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b045_a05_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The same local unit, decision, pathway, role, or resource must be both enabled and constrained in real time. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The same local unit, decision, pathway, role, or resource must be both enabled and constrained in real time."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Excitation-Inhibition Balance", "one_liner": "Two opposed channels run concurrently and sum at every locus, so the system's output is the difference of two large quantities — high-gain, sharply tunable, and catastrophic to lose either side.", "page_ref": "prime:excitation_inhibition_balance", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Local unit -> locus; enablement -> excitation; constraint -> inhibition.", "slug": "excitation_inhibition_balance", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Both opposite-signed channels are concurrently active and combined at every decision locus."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The same local output locus is enabled and constrained concurrently in real time.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Net output is necessarily sensitive to the difference between two large concurrent opposed channels.", "role_mapping": "Activation and restraint -> excitatory and inhibitory quantities; selection -> difference-shaped output.", "slug": "excitation_inhibition_balance", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b045_a05_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Selection, contrast, safety, or precision depends on the difference between activation and restraint rather than on either channel alone. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Selection, contrast, safety, or precision depends on the difference between activation and restraint rather than on either channel alone."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Excitation-Inhibition Balance", "one_liner": "Two opposed channels run concurrently and sum at every locus, so the system's output is the difference of two large quantities — high-gain, sharply tunable, and catastrophic to lose either side.", "page_ref": "prime:excitation_inhibition_balance", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Activation and restraint -> excitatory and inhibitory quantities; selection -> difference-shaped output.", "slug": "excitation_inhibition_balance", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Net output is necessarily sensitive to the difference between two large concurrent opposed channels."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Selection, contrast, safety, or precision depends on the difference between activation and restraint.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid balanced system need not have a hidden degraded channel or acceptable-looking net output.", "slug": "excitation_inhibition_balance"}], "residual_id": "r:opponent_channel_regulation:b045_a05_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b045_a05_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Net output can look acceptable while one internal channel is becoming saturated, underpowered, delayed, or corrupted. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Net output can look acceptable while one internal channel is becoming saturated, underpowered, delayed, or corrupted."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid balanced system need not have a hidden degraded channel or acceptable-looking net output.", "slug": "excitation_inhibition_balance"}], "normalized_requirement": "Acceptable net output can conceal saturation, delay, weakness, or corruption in one channel.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Acceptable net output can conceal saturation, delay, weakness, or corruption in one channel.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Selective loss of inhibition produces runaway while selective loss of activation produces silence.", "role_mapping": "Over-expression -> inhibition loss; over-suppression -> activation loss.", "slug": "excitation_inhibition_balance", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b045_a05_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Both over-expression and over-suppression are plausible and harmful failure modes. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Both over-expression and over-suppression are plausible and harmful failure modes."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Excitation-Inhibition Balance", "one_liner": "Two opposed channels run concurrently and sum at every locus, so the system's output is the difference of two large quantities — high-gain, sharply tunable, and catastrophic to lose either side.", "page_ref": "prime:excitation_inhibition_balance", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Over-expression -> inhibition loss; over-suppression -> activation loss.", "slug": "excitation_inhibition_balance", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Selective loss of inhibition produces runaway while selective loss of activation produces silence."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Both over-expression and over-suppression are plausible harmful failure modes.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The same go-signal drives a parallel brake that shapes the response in time and amplitude before output-error feedback can arrive.", "role_mapping": "Output onset -> go-signal; immediate restraint -> parallel inhibitory path; later correction -> feedback lag.", "slug": "feedforward_inhibition", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b045_a05_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A later corrective loop would arrive too late, because the output must be shaped at onset or within a narrow operating window. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A later corrective loop would arrive too late, because the output must be shaped at onset or within a narrow operating window."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Feedforward Inhibition", "one_liner": "The same input that activates a downstream element simultaneously recruits a brake on it along a parallel path, so the response is shaped by their difference.", "page_ref": "prime:feedforward_inhibition", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Output onset -> go-signal; immediate restraint -> parallel inhibitory path; later correction -> feedback lag.", "slug": "feedforward_inhibition", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The same go-signal drives a parallel brake that shapes the response in time and amplitude before output-error feedback can arrive."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The output must be restrained at onset because corrective feedback would arrive after the useful window.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 45, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-045", "ledger_sha256": "a59d7b1f99e10f7a31bbac9647e3780ac8a70c2b121adb7cb94aff52d5ff77fc"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Opportunity Cost Surfacing", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:opportunity_cost_surfacing", "slug": "opportunity_cost_surfacing"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 4 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is asymmetric visibility. The chosen option is usually concrete: it has a requester, a proposal, a deadline, and a visible benefit. The alternative it displaces is counterfactual: it is what could have happened if the same capacity had been used differently.\n\nBecause the forgone alternative is absent, a choice can look costless even when it consumes scarce execution capacity, attention, institutional credibility, political capital, recovery time, or future flexibility. This produces overcommitment, priority drift, and regret: not because the chosen option was bad, but because it was never compared against the best thing it prevented.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Resources, time, attention, capacity, or legitimacy are committed without visibility into the most valuable alternative being displaced, so choices appear cheaper or more harmless than they are."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires a scarce resource, a choice set, and exclusive allocation among alternatives.", "role_mapping": "Consumed resource -> binding constraint; elsewhere use -> alternative; commitment -> exclusive allocation.", "slug": "opportunity_cost", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b045_a06_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A proposed option consumes a resource that could be used elsewhere. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A proposed option consumes a resource that could be used elsewhere."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Opportunity Cost", "one_liner": "Value of best alternative.", "page_ref": "prime:opportunity_cost", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Consumed resource -> binding constraint; elsewhere use -> alternative; commitment -> exclusive allocation.", "slug": "opportunity_cost", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires a scarce resource, a choice set, and exclusive allocation among alternatives."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A proposed option consumes a scarce resource that could instead support another use.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A mature opportunity-cost analysis explicitly identifies the best alternative and therefore need not hide it.", "slug": "opportunity_cost"}], "residual_id": "r:opportunity_cost_surfacing:b045_a06_c2", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b045_a06_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The best alternative is absent from the room, dashboard, calendar, or budget view. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The best alternative is absent from the room, dashboard, calendar, or budget view."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A mature opportunity-cost analysis explicitly identifies the best alternative and therefore need not hide it.", "slug": "opportunity_cost"}], "normalized_requirement": "The best forgone alternative is absent from the operative decision display.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The best forgone alternative is absent from the operative decision display.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A single choice can have an opportunity cost without a sequence of collectively excessive commitments.", "slug": "opportunity_cost"}], "residual_id": "r:opportunity_cost_surfacing:b045_a06_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b045_a06_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Each commitment is individually defensible but collectively excessive. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Each commitment is individually defensible but collectively excessive."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A single choice can have an opportunity cost without a sequence of collectively excessive commitments.", "slug": "opportunity_cost"}], "normalized_requirement": "Individually defensible commitments are collectively excessive.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Individually defensible commitments are collectively excessive.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Opportunity cost applies prospectively to a new choice and does not require an old commitment or failed renewal.", "slug": "opportunity_cost"}], "residual_id": "r:opportunity_cost_surfacing:b045_a06_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b045_a06_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Existing commitments continue without renewed comparison against current alternatives. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Existing commitments continue without renewed comparison against current alternatives."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Opportunity cost applies prospectively to a new choice and does not require an old commitment or failed renewal.", "slug": "opportunity_cost"}], "normalized_requirement": "Existing commitments continue without renewed comparison to current alternatives.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Existing commitments continue without renewed comparison to current alternatives.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The sacrificed option is delayed, diffuse, politically quiet, or owned by someone else.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when the sacrificed alternative is quiet, delayed, diffuse, politically underrepresented, or difficult to measure. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The sacrificed option is delayed, diffuse, politically quiet, or owned by someone else. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The sacrificed option is delayed, diffuse, politically quiet, or owned by someone else.", "It is especially useful when the sacrificed alternative is quiet, delayed, diffuse, politically underrepresented, or difficult to measure."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The sacrificed option is delayed, diffuse, politically quiet, or owned by someone else."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 45, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-045", "ledger_sha256": "a59d7b1f99e10f7a31bbac9647e3780ac8a70c2b121adb7cb94aff52d5ff77fc"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Opportunity-Gated Adaptive Diversification", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:opportunity_gated_adaptive_diversification", "slug": "opportunity_gated_adaptive_diversification"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A new resource, platform, habitat, market, mission, regulatory opening, or institutional vacancy creates several distinct opportunity pockets, but the system lacks a governed way to diversify rapidly and then stop. A dominant early design may occupy every niche by default; nominally different branches may chase the same opportunity; specialists may be standardized before they learn; or proliferating lineages may continue after the space is saturated. The result is premature lock-in, wasted exploration, fragmented infrastructure, hidden common-mode dependence, or permanent pilot sprawl.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A new resource, platform, habitat, market, mission, regulatory opening, or institutional vacancy creates several distinct opportunity pockets, but the system lacks a governed way to diversify rapidly and then stop. A dominant early design may occupy every niche by default; nominally different branches may chase the same opportunity; specialists may be standardized before they learn; or proliferating lineages may continue after the space is saturated. The result is premature lock-in, wasted exploration, fragmented infrastructure, hidden common-mode dependence, or permanent pilot sprawl."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A gating event opening previously closed opportunity is mandatory.", "role_mapping": "Material change -> gating event; resources or missions -> opportunity space.", "slug": "adaptive_radiation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b045_a07_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A material change opens access to resources, users, habitats, missions, technologies, jurisdictions, or capabilities that were previously unavailable or uneconomic. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A material change opens access to resources, users, habitats, missions, technologies, jurisdictions, or capabilities that were previously unavailable or uneconomic."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Adaptive Radiation", "one_liner": "A variable source population given access to a newly opened, niche-structured space of opportunity fans out rapidly into many specialized subtypes, then consolidates as niches saturate — a burst gated jointly on opportunity, variability, and niche structure.", "page_ref": "prime:adaptive_radiation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Material change -> gating event; resources or missions -> opportunity space.", "slug": "adaptive_radiation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A gating event opening previously closed opportunity is mandatory."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A material change opens access to a previously unavailable or uneconomic opportunity space.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires a structured niche space that rewards differentiation.", "role_mapping": "Opportunity pockets -> niches; conditions of success -> specialization rewards.", "slug": "adaptive_radiation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b045_a07_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The opportunity space contains several separable niches with meaningfully different conditions of success. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The opportunity space contains several separable niches with meaningfully different conditions of success."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Adaptive Radiation", "one_liner": "A variable source population given access to a newly opened, niche-structured space of opportunity fans out rapidly into many specialized subtypes, then consolidates as niches saturate — a burst gated jointly on opportunity, variability, and niche structure.", "page_ref": "prime:adaptive_radiation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Opportunity pockets -> niches; conditions of success -> specialization rewards.", "slug": "adaptive_radiation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires a structured niche space that rewards differentiation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The opened space contains several separable niches with different success conditions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A source population with sufficient variability and reproductive capacity is mandatory.", "role_mapping": "Source team or design family -> ancestral population; variation -> raw material; specialist branches -> lineages.", "slug": "adaptive_radiation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b045_a07_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A source population, team base, design family, or capability pool has enough variation to generate distinct specialist lineages. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A source population, team base, design family, or capability pool has enough variation to generate distinct specialist lineages."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Adaptive Radiation", "one_liner": "A variable source population given access to a newly opened, niche-structured space of opportunity fans out rapidly into many specialized subtypes, then consolidates as niches saturate — a burst gated jointly on opportunity, variability, and niche structure.", "page_ref": "prime:adaptive_radiation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source team or design family -> ancestral population; variation -> raw material; specialist branches -> lineages.", "slug": "adaptive_radiation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A source population with sufficient variability and reproductive capacity is mandatory."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A variable source population or capability pool can generate distinct specialist lineages.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The fan-out is time-gated by the opening and slows as niches saturate.", "role_mapping": "Timing window -> fan-out window; occupied opportunities -> saturation and consolidation.", "slug": "adaptive_radiation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b045_a07_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Timing matters because opportunities may be occupied, close, degrade, or become locked around early choices. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Timing matters because opportunities may be occupied, close, degrade, or become locked around early choices."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Adaptive Radiation", "one_liner": "A variable source population given access to a newly opened, niche-structured space of opportunity fans out rapidly into many specialized subtypes, then consolidates as niches saturate — a burst gated jointly on opportunity, variability, and niche structure.", "page_ref": "prime:adaptive_radiation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Timing window -> fan-out window; occupied opportunities -> saturation and consolidation.", "slug": "adaptive_radiation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The fan-out is time-gated by the opening and slows as niches saturate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Opportunity timing matters because niches can be occupied, close, degrade, or lock around early choices.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A shared core of safety, rights, integrity, interoperability, or ecological constraints can be preserved while niche-facing traits diverge.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: A shared core of safety, rights, integrity, interoperability, or ecological constraints can be preserved while niche-facing traits diverge. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A shared core of safety, rights, integrity, interoperability, or ecological constraints can be preserved while niche-facing traits diverge."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "A shared core of safety, rights, integrity, interoperability, or ecological constraints can be preserved while niche-facing traits diverge."}, {"display_text": "Niche fit, learning, crowding, and resource use can be observed well enough to support rebalancing and phase transition.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A dominant early design may occupy every niche by default; nominally different branches may chase the same opportunity; specialists may be standardized before they learn; or proliferating lineages may continue after the space is saturated. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: Niche fit, learning, crowding, and resource use can be observed well enough to support rebalancing and phase transition. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Niche fit, learning, crowding, and resource use can be observed well enough to support rebalancing and phase transition.", "A dominant early design may occupy every niche by default; nominally different branches may chase the same opportunity; specialists may be standardized before they learn; or proliferating lineages may continue after the space is saturated."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Niche fit, learning, crowding, and resource use can be observed well enough to support rebalancing and phase transition."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 45, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-045", "ledger_sha256": "a59d7b1f99e10f7a31bbac9647e3780ac8a70c2b121adb7cb94aff52d5ff77fc"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Option Preservation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:option_preservation", "slug": "option_preservation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 4 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is premature collapse of the option space. A system faces several plausible futures or possible actions, but pressure for decisiveness, efficiency, political closure, or simplicity pushes it into a single path before the uncertainty is resolvable.\n\nOnce the path is chosen, switching costs appear: contracts, technical dependencies, sunk costs, stakeholder expectations, identity commitments, data formats, land use, public promises, or emotional investment. What looked like a small early choice becomes a hard-to-reverse future constraint.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system faces multiple plausible futures, designs, explanations, partners, investments, or actions, but ordinary pressure for speed, simplicity, or certainty pushes it toward early commitment that would collapse the option space before the decisive information is available."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires privileged direction and a restoration cost substantially greater than the forward transition.", "role_mapping": "Decision -> forward transition; hard reversal -> environmental debit and restoration asymmetry.", "slug": "irreversibility", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b045_a08_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A decision has irreversible or hard-to-reverse consequences. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A decision has irreversible or hard-to-reverse consequences."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Irreversibility", "one_liner": "Cannot revert state.", "page_ref": "prime:irreversibility", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Decision -> forward transition; hard reversal -> environmental debit and restoration asymmetry.", "slug": "irreversibility", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires privileged direction and a restoration cost substantially greater than the forward transition."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A decision would produce an irreversible or structurally hard-to-reverse state transition.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Optionality can be valuable under a known asymmetric payoff without several plausible futures or non-discriminating evidence.", "slug": "optionality"}], "residual_id": "r:option_preservation:b045_a08_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b045_a08_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Several futures remain plausible and the evidence is not yet discriminating. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Several futures remain plausible and the evidence is not yet discriminating."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Optionality can be valuable under a known asymmetric payoff without several plausible futures or non-discriminating evidence.", "slug": "optionality"}], "normalized_requirement": "Several futures remain plausible while evidence cannot yet discriminate among them.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Several futures remain plausible while evidence cannot yet discriminate among them.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Path dependence can arise from any historical sequence and does not require premature commitment or sunk-cost escalation.", "slug": "path_dependence"}], "residual_id": "r:option_preservation:b045_a08_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b045_a08_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A premature choice would create lock-in, sunk-cost escalation, or path dependence. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A premature choice would create lock-in, sunk-cost escalation, or path dependence."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Path dependence can arise from any historical sequence and does not require premature commitment or sunk-cost escalation.", "slug": "path_dependence"}], "normalized_requirement": "Premature commitment would create lock-in, sunk-cost escalation, or path dependence.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Premature commitment would create lock-in, sunk-cost escalation, or path dependence.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Reversal cost can be low or high without a forecast, plan, or single-track brittleness.", "slug": "reversibility_and_irreversibility"}], "residual_id": "r:option_preservation:b045_a08_c7", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b045_a08_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A single-track plan would become brittle under forecast error. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A single-track plan would become brittle under forecast error."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Reversal cost can be low or high without a forecast, plan, or single-track brittleness.", "slug": "reversibility_and_irreversibility"}], "normalized_requirement": "A single-track plan is brittle under forecast error.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A single-track plan is brittle under forecast error.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The system can keep alternatives alive at tolerable cost.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It works best when the system can name the option set, estimate the cost of keeping it open, and define what evidence will cause narrowing. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: The system can keep alternatives alive at tolerable cost. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The system can keep alternatives alive at tolerable cost.", "It works best when the system can name the option set, estimate the cost of keeping it open, and define what evidence will cause narrowing."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The system can keep alternatives alive at tolerable cost."}, {"display_text": "Learning will arrive before the final commitment window closes.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is weak when the choice is low-stakes and reversible, when no useful evidence will arrive, or when delay would close the window faster than learning can occur. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: Learning will arrive before the final commitment window closes. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Learning will arrive before the final commitment window closes.", "It is weak when the choice is low-stakes and reversible, when no useful evidence will arrive, or when delay would close the window faster than learning can occur."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Learning will arrive before the final commitment window closes."}, {"display_text": "Stakeholders disagree because they are implicitly optimizing for different futures.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Stakeholders disagree because they are implicitly optimizing for different futures. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders disagree because they are implicitly optimizing for different futures."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Stakeholders disagree because they are implicitly optimizing for different futures."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 45, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-045", "ledger_sha256": "a59d7b1f99e10f7a31bbac9647e3780ac8a70c2b121adb7cb94aff52d5ff77fc"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Option-Space Reopening", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:option_space_reopening", "slug": "option_space_reopening"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 6, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 2, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 2 of 6 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "An actor, group, interface, policy process, or argument presents a limited set of choices as if it exhausts the real option space. Reasoning then proceeds within the named cells, so alternatives outside the partition become invisible, illegitimate, unsayable, or prematurely infeasible.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "An actor, group, interface, policy process, or argument presents a limited set of choices as if it exhausts the real option space. Reasoning then proceeds within the named cells, so alternatives outside the partition become invisible, illegitimate, unsayable, or prematurely infeasible."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires a small partition, an unargued coverage claim, a non-empty residual, and pressure to choose inside the cells.", "role_mapping": "A/B frame -> presented cells; other paths -> residual region; exhaustiveness -> coverage claim.", "slug": "false_dilemma", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b045_a09_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A decision is framed as either A or B despite evidence that combinations, staged paths, abstentions, redesigns, or third options exist. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A decision is framed as either A or B despite evidence that combinations, staged paths, abstentions, redesigns, or third options exist."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "False Dilemma", "one_liner": "A partition of a rich option space is presented as exhaustive when it is not, so reasoning proceeds inside cells while real alternatives have been suppressed.", "page_ref": "prime:false_dilemma", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "A/B frame -> presented cells; other paths -> residual region; exhaustiveness -> coverage claim.", "slug": "false_dilemma", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires a small partition, an unargued coverage claim, a non-empty residual, and pressure to choose inside the cells."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A binary frame is presented as exhaustive even though combinations, staged paths, abstention, redesign, or third options exist.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The schema is a presented partition whose false completeness suppresses real alternatives.", "role_mapping": "Menu or frame -> partition; omitted alternatives -> residual; closure claim -> exhaustiveness.", "slug": "false_dilemma", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The exact record requires a finite schema, an out-of-schema consequential case, and false completeness after rigorous within-schema use.", "role_mapping": "Decision schema -> elicitation schema; omitted option -> out-of-schema case; closure -> false completeness.", "slug": "schema_bounded_blind_spot", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b045_a09_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A menu, taxonomy, policy frame, product interface, negotiation agenda, or public argument omits meaningful alternatives while claiming closure. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A menu, taxonomy, policy frame, product interface, negotiation agenda, or public argument omits meaningful alternatives while claiming closure."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "False Dilemma", "one_liner": "A partition of a rich option space is presented as exhaustive when it is not, so reasoning proceeds inside cells while real alternatives have been suppressed.", "page_ref": "prime:false_dilemma", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Menu or frame -> partition; omitted alternatives -> residual; closure claim -> exhaustiveness.", "slug": "false_dilemma", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The schema is a presented partition whose false completeness suppresses real alternatives."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Schema-Bounded Blind Spot", "one_liner": "A finite elicitation schema can be exhaustive only inside the categories it contains, so diligent use systematically misses cases outside its coverage boundary and can turn procedural rigor into false completeness.", "page_ref": "prime:schema_bounded_blind_spot", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Decision schema -> elicitation schema; omitted option -> out-of-schema case; closure -> false completeness.", "slug": "schema_bounded_blind_spot", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires a finite schema, an out-of-schema consequential case, and false completeness after rigorous within-schema use."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A finite decision schema omits meaningful alternatives while being treated as complete.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A false dilemma can be immediately challenged, and its exact record does not require effort spent comparing cells or absence of validation.", "slug": "false_dilemma"}], "residual_id": "r:option_space_reopening:b045_a09_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b045_a09_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Participants spend effort comparing listed options but no one has validated whether the list is complete. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Participants spend effort comparing listed options but no one has validated whether the list is complete."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A false dilemma can be immediately challenged, and its exact record does not require effort spent comparing cells or absence of validation.", "slug": "false_dilemma"}], "normalized_requirement": "Participants compare listed options without validating that the list is complete.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Participants compare listed options without validating that the list is complete.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A product of dimensions can be fully enumerated and does not entail a one-axis decision failure.", "slug": "cartesian_product"}], "residual_id": "r:option_space_reopening:b045_a09_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b045_a09_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The stated options depend on a single axis even though the problem has multiple independent dimensions. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The stated options depend on a single axis even though the problem has multiple independent dimensions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A product of dimensions can be fully enumerated and does not entail a one-axis decision failure.", "slug": "cartesian_product"}], "normalized_requirement": "A single decision axis is used despite several independent dimensions.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A single decision axis is used despite several independent dimensions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B5", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P087-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve stakeholder-identified possibilities as the excluded objects.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Stakeholders identify one or more possibilities for a focal decision or problem.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve exclusion by the official frame, not mere disagreement about option quality.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "An official frame treats those possibilities as inadmissible or outside the legitimate option space.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve unjustified dismissal rather than a reasoned feasibility or scope decision.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The official frame lacks justification for dismissing the possibilities.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "An official frame unjustifiably dismisses possibilities identified by stakeholders.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "official frame unjustifiably excludes stakeholder-identified possibilities", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P087-C02-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Suppressed alternatives can remain unidentified and need not be voiced by stakeholders or explicitly dismissed.", "slug": "false_dilemma"}], "residual_id": "r:option_space_reopening:b045_a09_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b045_a09_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Stakeholders identify possibilities that the official frame treats as impossible, irrelevant, childish, radical, or out of scope without justification. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders identify possibilities that the official frame treats as impossible, irrelevant, childish, radical, or out of scope without justification."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Suppressed alternatives can remain unidentified and need not be voiced by stakeholders or explicitly dismissed.", "slug": "false_dilemma"}], "normalized_requirement": "The official frame dismisses stakeholder-identified possibilities without justification.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The official frame dismisses stakeholder-identified possibilities without justification.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 5", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B6", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The false exhaustiveness claim can be an innocent cognitive error with no beneficiary or strategy.", "slug": "false_dilemma"}], "residual_id": "r:option_space_reopening:b045_a09_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b045_a09_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A binary choice is rhetorically useful to someone who benefits from excluding other cells. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A binary choice is rhetorically useful to someone who benefits from excluding other cells."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The false exhaustiveness claim can be an innocent cognitive error with no beneficiary or strategy.", "slug": "false_dilemma"}], "normalized_requirement": "A beneficiary uses a binary frame rhetorically to exclude other cells.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A beneficiary uses a binary frame rhetorically to exclude other cells.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 6", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "DISJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The decision is high-stakes enough that omitted options could change legitimacy, cost, risk, fairness, or reversibility.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The decision is high-stakes enough that omitted options could change legitimacy, cost, risk, fairness, or reversibility. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The decision is high-stakes enough that omitted options could change legitimacy, cost, risk, fairness, or reversibility."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "The decision is high-stakes enough that omitted options could change legitimacy, cost, risk, fairness, or reversibility."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 45, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-045", "ledger_sha256": "a59d7b1f99e10f7a31bbac9647e3780ac8a70c2b121adb7cb94aff52d5ff77fc"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Order-Independent Processing", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:order_independent_processing", "slug": "order_independent_processing"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is accidental sequence dependence. A system contains operations whose results change when the same inputs are processed in a different order, grouped differently, retried, or delivered concurrently. That dependence creates fragility: race conditions, duplicate side effects, inconsistent decisions, lost updates, blocked parallelism, and excessive coordination.\n\nThe diagnostic question is: “Should these different orders be substantively different?” If the answer is no, the system is paying coordination cost for a property that should have been designed away.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "The outcome changes depending on input order, processing order, grouping, arrival sequence, or retry history, causing fragility, race conditions, coordination overhead, or blocked parallelism."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A Poisson arrival process need not carry equivalent work items or make every realized order valid.", "slug": "poisson_process"}], "residual_id": "r:order_independent_processing:b045_a10_c1", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b045_a10_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Equivalent work items, events, or inputs can arrive in multiple valid orders. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Equivalent work items, events, or inputs can arrive in multiple valid orders."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A Poisson arrival process need not carry equivalent work items or make every realized order valid.", "slug": "poisson_process"}], "normalized_requirement": "Equivalent work items can arrive in several valid orders.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Equivalent work items can arrive in several valid orders.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Coordination can be cheap and need not impose a global sequence.", "slug": "coordination"}], "residual_id": "r:order_independent_processing:b045_a10_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b045_a10_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Coordination around a global sequence is expensive, slow, brittle, or politically contested. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Coordination around a global sequence is expensive, slow, brittle, or politically contested."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Coordination can be cheap and need not impose a global sequence.", "slug": "coordination"}], "normalized_requirement": "Maintaining one global processing sequence is expensive, slow, brittle, or contested.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Maintaining one global processing sequence is expensive, slow, brittle, or contested.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "Permuting, regrouping, or retrying the same effective inputs currently changes the computed outcome.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Permuting, regrouping, or retrying the same effective inputs currently changes the computed outcome.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Throughput or resilience requires parallel, distributed, batched, or asynchronous processing.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The system wants the efficiency and resilience of flexible processing, but the current operation semantics make outcome depend on sequence. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: Throughput or resilience requires parallel, distributed, batched, or asynchronous processing. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Throughput or resilience requires parallel, distributed, batched, or asynchronous processing.", "The system wants the efficiency and resilience of flexible processing, but the current operation semantics make outcome depend on sequence."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "Throughput or resilience requires parallel, distributed, batched, or asynchronous processing."}, {"display_text": "Retries, replays, duplicates, or delayed messages are normal rather than exceptional.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Retries, replays, duplicates, or delayed messages are normal rather than exceptional. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Retries, replays, duplicates, or delayed messages are normal rather than exceptional."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Retries, replays, duplicates, or delayed messages are normal rather than exceptional."}, {"display_text": "The desired decision or state should depend on the set of facts, updates, or checks, not on their incidental processing order.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when equivalent work items, events, records, checks, or updates may be processed in different orders and the intended outcome should remain the same. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: The desired decision or state should depend on the set of facts, updates, or checks, not on their incidental processing order. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The desired decision or state should depend on the set of facts, updates, or checks, not on their incidental processing order.", "Use this archetype when equivalent work items, events, records, checks, or updates may be processed in different orders and the intended outcome should remain the same."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The desired decision or state should depend on the set of facts, updates, or checks, not on their incidental processing order."}, {"display_text": "Partial results must be recombined after independent work.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially relevant when a system needs parallelism, asynchronous delivery, retry safety, distributed work, or independent teams handling pieces of a shared process. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: Partial results must be recombined after independent work. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Partial results must be recombined after independent work.", "It is especially relevant when a system needs parallelism, asynchronous delivery, retry safety, distributed work, or independent teams handling pieces of a shared process."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Partial results must be recombined after independent work."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 45, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-045", "ledger_sha256": "a59d7b1f99e10f7a31bbac9647e3780ac8a70c2b121adb7cb94aff52d5ff77fc"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": [{"groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_SYNTHESIS", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A correctly configured stream processor may receive no delayed record in a particular interval; the guard excludes exactly that modality counterexample.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Stream Processing", "one_liner": "Compute over data as it arrives — one record or small time-window at a time — under a bounded-latency commitment, decoupling when an event happened from when it arrived and using a watermark to decide when a time window is safe to close and emit.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:stream_processing", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1", "O6"], "guard_type": "MODALITY_ACTUALIZATION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "message_arrives_after_event_time", "predicate": "At least one message arrives after its event time during operation.", "rationale": "The guard actualizes one candidate-native delayed-arrival event, fills exactly O1 and O6, and neither restates the full head nor substitutes a solution operation."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "stream_processing"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "At least one message arrives after its event time during operation."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "stream_processing", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P087-C03-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record directly makes delay normal and modeled, but only possible; one atomic occurrence guard is necessary and sufficient for the actual delayed-message branch."}], "publication_role": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT_ONLY", "source_residual_occurrence_id": "r:order_independent_processing:b045_a10_c3", "unit": {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P087-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the selected retry, replay, duplicate, or delay as an event in a processing system.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A processing or messaging system experiences the selected event.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve normality as part of the operating regime.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The event is a normal operating occurrence rather than an exceptional condition.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires retries as normal events.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The normal event is a retry.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires replays as normal events.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The normal event is a replay.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires duplicate messages as normal events.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The normal event is a duplicate.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires delayed messages as normal events.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The normal event is a delayed message.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "One listed message-delivery irregularity occurs as a normal operating event.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "message retry, replay, duplication, or delay is normal rather than exceptional", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P087-C03-U1"}}]}
{"archetype": {"name": "Order-Sensitive Configuration", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:order_sensitive_configuration", "slug": "order_sensitive_configuration"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 4 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is that element choice and element order are being confused. People may select the right elements and still fail because the elements interact cumulatively. Earlier elements create states, meanings, permissions, capabilities, or material conditions that later elements depend on.\n\nThe failure is often invisible at the moment of misordering. A missing prerequisite, a reversed explanation, or a premature irreversible step may only surface later as rework, invalidity, misunderstanding, or harm.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A set of valid elements, steps, modules, actions, messages, or transformations is available, but their order changes meaning, function, safety, legality, learning, or quality; treating the elements as interchangeable or unordered causes failures that are not visible from the elements alone."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Rank-dependent value concerns a holder's ordinal position in a comparison distribution, not permutation of transformation or module order.", "slug": "rank_dependent_value"}], "residual_id": "r:order_sensitive_configuration:b045_a11_c1", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b045_a11_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Same elements, different outcome. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Same elements, different outcome"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Rank-dependent value concerns a holder's ordinal position in a comparison distribution, not permutation of transformation or module order.", "slug": "rank_dependent_value"}], "normalized_requirement": "The same elements produce a different outcome when ordered differently.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The same elements produce a different outcome when ordered differently.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A DAG can encode ancestry, causality, or reachability without a required execution sequence.", "slug": "directed_acyclic_graph"}], "residual_id": "r:order_sensitive_configuration:b045_a11_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b045_a11_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Prerequisite or state dependency. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Prerequisite or state dependency"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A DAG can encode ancestry, causality, or reachability without a required execution sequence.", "slug": "directed_acyclic_graph"}], "normalized_requirement": "Prerequisite or state dependencies constrain valid element order.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Prerequisite or state dependencies constrain valid element order.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P087-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve orderable elements within one process or configuration.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A process or configuration contains elements whose sequence can be ordered correctly or incorrectly.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve misordering rather than an invalid element independent of sequence.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The elements are placed or processed in an incorrect order.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the sequence-to-consequence direction.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The misordering creates the selected negative consequence.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires misordering to create rework.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The consequence of misordering is rework.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires misordering to create an invalid state.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The consequence of misordering is an invalid state.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires misordering to create harm.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The consequence of misordering is harm.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Putting valid elements in the wrong order creates rework, an invalid state, or harm.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "misordering causes rework, invalid state, or harm", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P087-C04-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A rank-based value change need not create rework, invalid state, or harm.", "slug": "rank_dependent_value"}], "residual_id": "r:order_sensitive_configuration:b045_a11_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b045_a11_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Misordering creates rework or harm. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Misordering creates rework or harm"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A correctly ordered but visually unattractive focus sequence could be an interface defect without satisfying either focus-order failure or this misordering unit.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Focus-Order Failure", "one_liner": "The accessibility defect in which an interface advances programmatic focus (Tab navigation, screen-reader linearization) in a sequence that diverges from the task's semantic order — invisible to visual review, and sometimes placing a confirmation control before the content it confirms.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:focus_order_failure", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "focus_order_failure"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "focus_order_failure", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P087-C04-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record directly entails the harm branch: incorrect traversal order causes an accessibility defect for keyboard and assistive-technology users."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Misordering creates rework, invalid state, or harm.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Conflicting subsystem models need not involve a template or sequence.", "slug": "inconsistent_shared_model"}], "residual_id": "r:order_sensitive_configuration:b045_a11_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b045_a11_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Template logic is insufficient. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Template logic is insufficient"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Conflicting subsystem models need not involve a template or sequence.", "slug": "inconsistent_shared_model"}], "normalized_requirement": "A reusable template cannot determine the correct sequence without local state.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A reusable template cannot determine the correct sequence without local state.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Local adaptation needs guardrails.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Too little ordering treats a sequence-sensitive configuration as an unordered set; too much ordering turns every inherited convention into a rigid rule and blocks safe local adaptation. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: Local adaptation needs guardrails. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Local adaptation needs guardrails", "Too little ordering treats a sequence-sensitive configuration as an unordered set; too much ordering turns every inherited convention into a rigid rule and blocks safe local adaptation."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Local adaptation needs guardrails"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 45, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-045", "ledger_sha256": "a59d7b1f99e10f7a31bbac9647e3780ac8a70c2b121adb7cb94aff52d5ff77fc"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Organization–Artifact Topology Alignment", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:organization_artifact_topology_alignment", "slug": "organization_artifact_topology_alignment"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 6, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 5, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 7 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 6 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 7}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A collective is trying to build or maintain an artifact whose desired architecture does not match the actual topology of communication, ownership, trust, and decision rights among the builders. The artifact acquires seams, dependencies, bottlenecks, duplicated concepts, or integration failures that reflect organizational boundaries rather than domain structure. Alternatively, leaders redesign the organization without noticing that the artifact architecture now preserves the old communication graph as technical debt.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A collective is trying to build or maintain an artifact whose desired architecture does not match the actual topology of communication, ownership, trust, and decision rights among the builders. The artifact acquires seams, dependencies, bottlenecks, duplicated concepts, or integration failures that reflect organizational boundaries rather than domain structure. Alternatively, leaders redesign the organization without noticing that the artifact architecture now preserves the old communication graph as technical debt."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires a homomorphism from producer communication topology to artifact module topology.", "role_mapping": "Team boundaries -> producer seams; module boundaries -> artifact seams; mapping -> homomorphic imprint.", "slug": "conways_law", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b045_a12_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The artifact may be expressing organizational topology rather than domain topology. In this condition set, the requirement is: Artifact module seams map to team, department, vendor, or jurisdictional boundaries.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A system or product has module seams that map suspiciously well to team, department, vendor, or jurisdictional boundaries."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Conway's Law", "one_liner": "Any artifact built by a collective acquires a structure homomorphic to the communication topology of the collective that built it.", "page_ref": "prime:conways_law", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Team boundaries -> producer seams; module boundaries -> artifact seams; mapping -> homomorphic imprint.", "slug": "conways_law", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires a homomorphism from producer communication topology to artifact module topology."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Artifact module seams map to team, department, vendor, or jurisdictional boundaries.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P087-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O9"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the producer organization, artifact, and architecture roles.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An organization produces or maintains an artifact with an architecture.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an organizational change relevant to the producer topology.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The selected event changes the organization's topology, ownership, or communication structure.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve architectural non-change rather than simultaneous realignment.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The artifact architecture remains unchanged through that organizational change.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the resulting mismatch in time.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The organizational change and architectural non-change coexist after the change event.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a reorganization while architecture remains unchanged.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The organizational change is a reorganization.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a merger while architecture remains unchanged.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The organizational change is a merger.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires outsourcing while architecture remains unchanged.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The organizational change is an outsourcing decision.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a platform initiative while architecture remains unchanged.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The organizational change is a platform initiative.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a team split while architecture remains unchanged.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "The organizational change is a team split.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A listed organizational-topology change occurs while the artifact architecture remains unchanged.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "organization changes while artifact architecture preserves its prior topology", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P087-C05-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A Conway-law instance can be greenfield and need not include a reorganization or legacy artifact.", "slug": "conways_law"}], "residual_id": "r:organization_artifact_topology_alignment:b045_a12_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b045_a12_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The old artifact graph can lock in the old organization graph. In this condition set, the requirement is: The producer organization changes while artifact architecture preserves the old topology.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A reorganization, merger, outsourcing decision, platform initiative, or team split occurs while the artifact architecture remains unchanged."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A Conway-law instance can be greenfield and need not include a reorganization or legacy artifact.", "slug": "conways_law"}], "normalized_requirement": "The producer organization changes while artifact architecture preserves the old topology.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The producer organization changes while artifact architecture preserves the old topology.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires a homomorphism from producer communication topology to artifact module topology.", "role_mapping": "Team boundaries -> producer seams; module boundaries -> artifact seams; mapping -> homomorphic imprint.", "slug": "conways_law", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b045_a12_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The artifact may be expressing organizational topology rather than domain topology. In this condition set, the requirement is: Artifact module seams map to team, department, vendor, or jurisdictional boundaries.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A system or product has module seams that map suspiciously well to team, department, vendor, or jurisdictional boundaries."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Conway's Law", "one_liner": "Any artifact built by a collective acquires a structure homomorphic to the communication topology of the collective that built it.", "page_ref": "prime:conways_law", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Team boundaries -> producer seams; module boundaries -> artifact seams; mapping -> homomorphic imprint.", "slug": "conways_law", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires a homomorphism from producer communication topology to artifact module topology."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Artifact module seams map to team, department, vendor, or jurisdictional boundaries.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact imprint can already match producer links and need not conflict with a desired architecture.", "slug": "conways_law"}], "residual_id": "r:organization_artifact_topology_alignment:b045_a12_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b045_a12_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The design may be theoretically clean but sociotechnically infeasible. In this condition set, the requirement is: A desired architecture requires frequent coordination across groups with weak communication links.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A desired architecture requires frequent coordination among groups that do not communicate easily."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact imprint can already match producer links and need not conflict with a desired architecture.", "slug": "conways_law"}], "normalized_requirement": "A desired architecture requires frequent coordination across groups with weak communication links.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A desired architecture requires frequent coordination across groups with weak communication links.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires a homomorphism from producer communication topology to artifact module topology.", "role_mapping": "Team boundaries -> producer seams; module boundaries -> artifact seams; mapping -> homomorphic imprint.", "slug": "conways_law", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b045_a12_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The artifact may be expressing organizational topology rather than domain topology. In this condition set, the requirement is: Artifact module seams map to team, department, vendor, or jurisdictional boundaries.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A system or product has module seams that map suspiciously well to team, department, vendor, or jurisdictional boundaries."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Conway's Law", "one_liner": "Any artifact built by a collective acquires a structure homomorphic to the communication topology of the collective that built it.", "page_ref": "prime:conways_law", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Team boundaries -> producer seams; module boundaries -> artifact seams; mapping -> homomorphic imprint.", "slug": "conways_law", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires a homomorphism from producer communication topology to artifact module topology."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Artifact module seams map to team, department, vendor, or jurisdictional boundaries.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P087-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve integration work and the boundary where its load concentrates.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Integration work for an artifact concentrates at a boundary.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve correspondence between the technical integration boundary and organizational integration need.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The organization requires a corresponding mechanism to integrate across that boundary.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail absence rather than weakness of an existing equivalent mechanism.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The corresponding organizational mechanism is absent.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires no corresponding organizational integration role.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The absent mechanism is an equivalent integration role.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires no corresponding organizational integration channel.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The absent mechanism is an equivalent integration channel.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Integration work concentrates at a boundary lacking an equivalent organizational integration role or channel.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "boundary integration load lacks corresponding organizational integration mechanism", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P087-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Producer and artifact topologies can map cleanly with no missing integration channel.", "slug": "conways_law"}], "residual_id": "r:organization_artifact_topology_alignment:b045_a12_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b045_a12_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A missing social interface usually becomes a technical integration problem. In this condition set, the requirement is: Integration work concentrates where the organization lacks a corresponding integration channel or role.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Integration work concentrates at a boundary where the organization lacks an equivalent integration role or channel."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Producer and artifact topologies can map cleanly with no missing integration channel.", "slug": "conways_law"}], "normalized_requirement": "Integration work concentrates where the organization lacks a corresponding integration channel or role.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Integration work concentrates where the organization lacks a corresponding integration channel or role.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires a homomorphism from producer communication topology to artifact module topology.", "role_mapping": "Team boundaries -> producer seams; module boundaries -> artifact seams; mapping -> homomorphic imprint.", "slug": "conways_law", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b045_a12_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The artifact may be expressing organizational topology rather than domain topology. In this condition set, the requirement is: Artifact module seams map to team, department, vendor, or jurisdictional boundaries.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A system or product has module seams that map suspiciously well to team, department, vendor, or jurisdictional boundaries."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Conway's Law", "one_liner": "Any artifact built by a collective acquires a structure homomorphic to the communication topology of the collective that built it.", "page_ref": "prime:conways_law", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Team boundaries -> producer seams; module boundaries -> artifact seams; mapping -> homomorphic imprint.", "slug": "conways_law", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires a homomorphism from producer communication topology to artifact module topology."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Artifact module seams map to team, department, vendor, or jurisdictional boundaries.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Topology imprint does not require local optimization or a fragmented user journey.", "slug": "conways_law"}], "residual_id": "r:organization_artifact_topology_alignment:b045_a12_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b045_a12_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Local organizational incentives have imprinted on product seams. In this condition set, the requirement is: Local module optimization fragments the user journey or whole-system behavior.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Local teams optimize modules, metrics, or roadmaps in ways that fragment user journeys or system behavior."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Topology imprint does not require local optimization or a fragmented user journey.", "slug": "conways_law"}], "normalized_requirement": "Local module optimization fragments the user journey or whole-system behavior.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Local module optimization fragments the user journey or whole-system behavior.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B5", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires a homomorphism from producer communication topology to artifact module topology.", "role_mapping": "Team boundaries -> producer seams; module boundaries -> artifact seams; mapping -> homomorphic imprint.", "slug": "conways_law", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b045_a12_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The artifact may be expressing organizational topology rather than domain topology. In this condition set, the requirement is: Artifact module seams map to team, department, vendor, or jurisdictional boundaries.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A system or product has module seams that map suspiciously well to team, department, vendor, or jurisdictional boundaries."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Conway's Law", "one_liner": "Any artifact built by a collective acquires a structure homomorphic to the communication topology of the collective that built it.", "page_ref": "prime:conways_law", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Team boundaries -> producer seams; module boundaries -> artifact seams; mapping -> homomorphic imprint.", "slug": "conways_law", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires a homomorphism from producer communication topology to artifact module topology."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Artifact module seams map to team, department, vendor, or jurisdictional boundaries.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime explicitly distinguishes the official organizational chart from the operative informal relationship network.", "role_mapping": "Official reporting -> formal structure; communication network -> informal structure; material difference -> divergence.", "slug": "formal_vs_informal_structures", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b045_a12_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The artifact may mirror the informal network rather than the formal chart. In this condition set, the requirement is: Informal communication networks differ materially from official reporting structures.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Informal communication networks differ materially from official reporting structures."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Formal vs. Informal Structures", "one_liner": "Official vs actual systems.", "page_ref": "prime:formal_vs_informal_structures", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Official reporting -> formal structure; communication network -> informal structure; material difference -> divergence.", "slug": "formal_vs_informal_structures", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime explicitly distinguishes the official organizational chart from the operative informal relationship network."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Informal communication networks differ materially from official reporting structures.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 5", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B6", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires a homomorphism from producer communication topology to artifact module topology.", "role_mapping": "Team boundaries -> producer seams; module boundaries -> artifact seams; mapping -> homomorphic imprint.", "slug": "conways_law", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b045_a12_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The artifact may be expressing organizational topology rather than domain topology. In this condition set, the requirement is: Artifact module seams map to team, department, vendor, or jurisdictional boundaries.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A system or product has module seams that map suspiciously well to team, department, vendor, or jurisdictional boundaries."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Conway's Law", "one_liner": "Any artifact built by a collective acquires a structure homomorphic to the communication topology of the collective that built it.", "page_ref": "prime:conways_law", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Team boundaries -> producer seams; module boundaries -> artifact seams; mapping -> homomorphic imprint.", "slug": "conways_law", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires a homomorphism from producer communication topology to artifact module topology."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Artifact module seams map to team, department, vendor, or jurisdictional boundaries.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The artifact can mirror its producer topology without failing or lacking technical skill.", "slug": "conways_law"}], "residual_id": "r:organization_artifact_topology_alignment:b045_a12_c8", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b045_a12_c8", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The constraint may be social topology, not local engineering capacity. In this condition set, the requirement is: Artifact failure arises from coordination overhead rather than missing technical skill.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A complex artifact is failing through coordination overhead rather than missing technical skill."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The artifact can mirror its producer topology without failing or lacking technical skill.", "slug": "conways_law"}], "normalized_requirement": "Artifact failure arises from coordination overhead rather than missing technical skill.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Artifact failure arises from coordination overhead rather than missing technical skill.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [8], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 6", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "MIXED", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A platform, shared service, or API boundary is introduced to decouple teams.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The intervention must distinguish true decoupling from a hidden coordination channel. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: A platform, shared service, or API boundary is introduced to decouple teams. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A platform, shared service, or API boundary is introduced to decouple teams.", "The intervention must distinguish true decoupling from a hidden coordination channel."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "A platform, shared service, or API boundary is introduced to decouple teams."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 45, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-045", "ledger_sha256": "a59d7b1f99e10f7a31bbac9647e3780ac8a70c2b121adb7cb94aff52d5ff77fc"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Oriented Goal Wayfinding", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:oriented_goal_wayfinding", "slug": "oriented_goal_wayfinding"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "An agent must reach or approach a goal through a space with structure, obstacles, alternatives, and uncertainty, but available information is incomplete enough that direct execution of a fixed plan risks disorientation, dead ends, wasted motion, or irreversible drift.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "An agent must reach or approach a goal through a space with structure, obstacles, alternatives, and uncertainty, but available information is incomplete enough that direct execution of a fixed plan risks disorientation, dead ends, wasted motion, or irreversible drift."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires a goal, current position, traversable space, and incomplete map.", "role_mapping": "Agent -> positioned mover; goal -> destination; partial knowledge -> incomplete map.", "slug": "navigation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b045_a13_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The agent has a goal or destination but only partial knowledge of the space, route, constraints, or current position. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The agent has a goal or destination but only partial knowledge of the space, route, constraints, or current position."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Navigation", "one_liner": "A positioned agent moves through a structured space toward a goal using an incomplete map, staying oriented at each step.", "page_ref": "prime:navigation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Agent -> positioned mover; goal -> destination; partial knowledge -> incomplete map.", "slug": "navigation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires a goal, current position, traversable space, and incomplete map."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A goal-directed agent has only partial knowledge of the space, route, constraints, or current position.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Navigation is constrained to local neighboring moves while the agent continually updates orientation from an incomplete map.", "role_mapping": "Movement -> local action; changed reach -> neighborhood transition; stepwise choice -> locality constraint.", "slug": "navigation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b045_a13_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Movement changes what the agent can observe, choose, or reach, so decisions must be made step by step rather than once in advance. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Movement changes what the agent can observe, choose, or reach, so decisions must be made step by step rather than once in advance."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Navigation", "one_liner": "A positioned agent moves through a structured space toward a goal using an incomplete map, staying oriented at each step.", "page_ref": "prime:navigation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Movement -> local action; changed reach -> neighborhood transition; stepwise choice -> locality constraint.", "slug": "navigation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Navigation is constrained to local neighboring moves while the agent continually updates orientation from an incomplete map."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Local movement changes what can be observed, chosen, or reached, requiring stepwise decisions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P087-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O9"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O10"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a wayfinding agent and uncertainty about orientation or state.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An agent navigating toward a goal has orientation uncertainty.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve one local cue-like information source available during navigation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The selected local information source is available to the agent.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve possible uncertainty reduction rather than guaranteed elimination.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The information source can reduce the agent's orientation uncertainty.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve correct interpretation as a condition of the reduction.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Uncertainty reduction depends on correct interpretation of the information source.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a local cue.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The information source is a local cue.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a landmark.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The information source is a landmark.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires coordinate information.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The information source is a coordinate.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a state marker.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The information source is a state marker.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires feedback.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "The information source is feedback.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires an affordance.", "obligation_id": "O10", "statement": "The information source is an affordance.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A correctly interpreted local information source can reduce an agent's orientation uncertainty.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "correctly interpreted local cue can reduce orientation uncertainty", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P087-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Navigation requires orientation and a map but can use dead reckoning or state estimation without an external cue or landmark.", "slug": "navigation"}], "residual_id": "r:oriented_goal_wayfinding:b045_a13_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b045_a13_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Local cues, landmarks, coordinates, state markers, feedback, or affordances can reduce uncertainty if interpreted correctly. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Local cues, landmarks, coordinates, state markers, feedback, or affordances can reduce uncertainty if interpreted correctly."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Navigation requires orientation and a map but can use dead reckoning or state estimation without an external cue or landmark.", "slug": "navigation"}], "normalized_requirement": "Local cues or landmarks can reduce orientation uncertainty when interpreted correctly.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Local cues or landmarks can reduce orientation uncertainty when interpreted correctly.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record abandons a locally chosen path after contradiction and restores a prior decision state to explore another branch.", "role_mapping": "Invalidated route -> contradicted branch; return -> restored state; replanning -> alternative branch.", "slug": "backtracking", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b045_a13_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Backtracking, replanning, or route comparison is possible when local evidence invalidates the current path. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Backtracking, replanning, or route comparison is possible when local evidence invalidates the current path."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Backtracking", "one_liner": "Extend a partial solution one step at a time and reverse the most recent commitment as soon as a constraint proves it cannot succeed, preserving earlier work.", "page_ref": "prime:backtracking", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Invalidated route -> contradicted branch; return -> restored state; replanning -> alternative branch.", "slug": "backtracking", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record abandons a locally chosen path after contradiction and restores a prior decision state to explore another branch."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Backtracking or replanning is possible when local evidence invalidates the current path.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The cost of becoming lost, stuck, circular, or irreversibly committed is high enough to require orientation maintenance.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Goal-directed movement needs commitment to a direction, but incomplete maps require humility, local sensing, and reversible course correction; too much commitment causes getting lost, while too much hesitation prevents progress. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The cost of becoming lost, stuck, circular, or irreversibly committed is high enough to require orientation maintenance. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The cost of becoming lost, stuck, circular, or irreversibly committed is high enough to require orientation maintenance.", "Goal-directed movement needs commitment to a direction, but incomplete maps require humility, local sensing, and reversible course correction; too much commitment causes getting lost, while too much hesitation prevents progress."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The cost of becoming lost, stuck, circular, or irreversibly committed is high enough to require orientation maintenance."}, {"display_text": "The space may be physical, conceptual, social, technical, institutional, strategic, informational, or procedural.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: The space may be physical, conceptual, social, technical, institutional, strategic, informational, or procedural. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The space may be physical, conceptual, social, technical, institutional, strategic, informational, or procedural."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The space may be physical, conceptual, social, technical, institutional, strategic, informational, or procedural."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 45, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-045", "ledger_sha256": "a59d7b1f99e10f7a31bbac9647e3780ac8a70c2b121adb7cb94aff52d5ff77fc"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Ornament-Function Integration and Structural Expression", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:ornament_function_integration_and_structural_expression", "slug": "ornament_function_integration_and_structural_expression"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 3 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A designed object, space, interface, artifact, or communication layer needs visual richness, symbolic meaning, or aesthetic identity, but decorative additions risk becoming arbitrary, costly, misleading, inaccessible, or detached from the system’s function and structure.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A designed object, space, interface, artifact, or communication layer needs visual richness, symbolic meaning, or aesthetic identity, but decorative additions risk becoming arbitrary, costly, misleading, inaccessible, or detached from the system’s function and structure."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires a decorative substrate or coherent embellishment applied to functional or structural form.", "role_mapping": "Design detail -> ornamental vocabulary; artifact -> functional form.", "slug": "ornamentation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b045_a14_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A design includes or requires ornamental, expressive, decorative, iconic, or visually rich detail. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A design includes or requires ornamental, expressive, decorative, iconic, or visually rich detail."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Ornamentation", "one_liner": "Decorative enhancement.", "page_ref": "prime:ornamentation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Design detail -> ornamental vocabulary; artifact -> functional form.", "slug": "ornamentation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires a decorative substrate or coherent embellishment applied to functional or structural form."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A design includes ornamental, expressive, decorative, iconic, or visually rich detail.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P087-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve ornament within a designed object and a value borne by it.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A designed artifact or environment contains ornament that carries value.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the counterfactual removal rather than already-completed removal.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A minimalist strategy would remove that ornament.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve removal-to-value-loss direction.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Removing the ornament would cause loss of the selected value.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires symbolic value loss.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The lost value would be symbolic.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires cultural value loss.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The lost value would be cultural.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires pedagogical value loss.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The lost value would be pedagogical.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires experiential value loss.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The lost value would be experiential.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Removing ornament through a minimalist strategy would eliminate one listed kind of value.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "minimalist ornament removal would cause value loss", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P087-C08-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Some valid ornament is replaceable or purely formal and its removal need not lose one of the listed values.", "slug": "ornamentation"}], "residual_id": "r:ornament_function_integration_and_structural_expression:b045_a14_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b045_a14_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A minimalist removal strategy would lose symbolic, cultural, pedagogical, or experiential value. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A minimalist removal strategy would lose symbolic, cultural, pedagogical, or experiential value."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Some valid ornament is replaceable or purely formal and its removal need not lose one of the listed values.", "slug": "ornamentation"}], "normalized_requirement": "Removing ornament would lose symbolic, cultural, pedagogical, or experiential value.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Removing ornament would lose symbolic, cultural, pedagogical, or experiential value.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P087-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an element whose operative role is pure decoration.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A designed artifact or environment contains a purely decorative element.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve decoration-to-burden direction rather than incidental coexistence.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The pure decoration creates the selected burden.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires pure decoration to create cost.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The burden is cost.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires pure decoration to create maintenance burden.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The burden is maintenance burden.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires pure decoration to create confusion.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The burden is confusion.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires pure decoration to create an accessibility problem.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The burden is an accessibility problem.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires pure decoration to create visual noise.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The burden is visual noise.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Pure decoration creates one listed operational, accessibility, or perceptual burden.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "functionally detached decoration causes burden", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P087-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Coherent ornament can enhance rather than burden the artifact and need not create any failure.", "slug": "ornamentation"}], "residual_id": "r:ornament_function_integration_and_structural_expression:b045_a14_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b045_a14_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Pure decoration is creating cost, maintenance burden, confusion, accessibility problems, or visual noise. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Pure decoration is creating cost, maintenance burden, confusion, accessibility problems, or visual noise."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Coherent ornament can enhance rather than burden the artifact and need not create any failure.", "slug": "ornamentation"}], "normalized_requirement": "Pure decoration creates maintenance, accessibility, confusion, or visual-noise cost.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Pure decoration creates maintenance, accessibility, confusion, or visual-noise cost.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Stakeholders want beauty, identity, cultural expression, or craft without undermining function.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A designed object, space, interface, artifact, or communication layer needs visual richness, symbolic meaning, or aesthetic identity, but decorative additions risk becoming arbitrary, costly, misleading, inaccessible, or detached from the system’s function and structure. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Stakeholders want beauty, identity, cultural expression, or craft without undermining function. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders want beauty, identity, cultural expression, or craft without undermining function.", "A designed object, space, interface, artifact, or communication layer needs visual richness, symbolic meaning, or aesthetic identity, but decorative additions risk becoming arbitrary, costly, misleading, inaccessible, or detached from the system’s function and structure."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "Stakeholders want beauty, identity, cultural expression, or craft without undermining function."}, {"display_text": "Decorative elements could plausibly also guide use, reveal structure, show hierarchy, protect material, signal state, improve handling, or clarify meaning.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Ornament can enrich meaning and perception, but it can also add noise and cost unless it is tied to function, structure, material behavior, or use logic. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: Decorative elements could plausibly also guide use, reveal structure, show hierarchy, protect material, signal state, improve handling, or clarify meaning. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Decorative elements could plausibly also guide use, reveal structure, show hierarchy, protect material, signal state, improve handling, or clarify meaning.", "Ornament can enrich meaning and perception, but it can also add noise and cost unless it is tied to function, structure, material behavior, or use logic."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Decorative elements could plausibly also guide use, reveal structure, show hierarchy, protect material, signal state, improve handling, or clarify meaning."}, {"display_text": "The underlying structure, function, workflow, or affordance can be made legible through form, pattern, texture, color, icon, or proportion.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Ornament can enrich meaning and perception, but it can also add noise and cost unless it is tied to function, structure, material behavior, or use logic. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: The underlying structure, function, workflow, or affordance can be made legible through form, pattern, texture, color, icon, or proportion. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The underlying structure, function, workflow, or affordance can be made legible through form, pattern, texture, color, icon, or proportion.", "Ornament can enrich meaning and perception, but it can also add noise and cost unless it is tied to function, structure, material behavior, or use logic."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The underlying structure, function, workflow, or affordance can be made legible through form, pattern, texture, color, icon, or proportion."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 45, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-045", "ledger_sha256": "a59d7b1f99e10f7a31bbac9647e3780ac8a70c2b121adb7cb94aff52d5ff77fc"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Oscillation Damping", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:oscillation_damping", "slug": "oscillation_damping"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 4 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a regenerative correction loop. A deviation triggers action, but the action is mistimed, too strong, or too sensitive. By the time the correction takes effect, the system has moved past the target or the signal has changed. The next correction then pushes back in the other direction, creating a recurring cycle.\n\nThe most common structural causes are excessive response gain, lag between decision and effect, narrow trigger thresholds, noisy signals, synchronized reactions by many actors, or lack of a tolerance band. The visible symptom is alternating error; the deeper cause is usually the design of the feedback path.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system does not merely deviate from target once; it repeatedly crosses the target or acceptable range in alternating directions because each correction produces conditions for the next opposite correction."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires a cycling state variable that returns around an equilibrium with amplitude and phase.", "role_mapping": "State -> cycling variable; target -> equilibrium; repeated crossing -> oscillatory cycle.", "slug": "oscillation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b045_a15_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Repeated crossing. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Repeated crossing"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Oscillation", "one_liner": "Repeated variation.", "page_ref": "prime:oscillation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "State -> cycling variable; target -> equilibrium; repeated crossing -> oscillatory cycle.", "slug": "oscillation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires a cycling state variable that returns around an equilibrium with amplitude and phase."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A state repeatedly crosses its target or acceptable range in alternating directions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Oscillation can be driven by inertia or periodic forcing without a corrective decision overreacting.", "slug": "oscillation"}], "residual_id": "r:oscillation_damping:b045_a15_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b045_a15_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Corrective overreaction. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Corrective overreaction"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Oscillation can be driven by inertia or periodic forcing without a corrective decision overreacting.", "slug": "oscillation"}], "normalized_requirement": "Each corrective response overshoots and creates the next opposite deviation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Each corrective response overshoots and creates the next opposite deviation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A conservative oscillator can have no delayed feedback channel.", "slug": "oscillation"}], "residual_id": "r:oscillation_damping:b045_a15_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b045_a15_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Lagged feedback. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Lagged feedback"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A conservative oscillator can have no delayed feedback channel.", "slug": "oscillation"}], "normalized_requirement": "Feedback arrives late enough to sustain alternating correction.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Feedback arrives late enough to sustain alternating correction.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P087-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the signal's correction-trigger role.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A feedback or control process uses a signal to trigger corrective action.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve noise in the trigger signal, not noise elsewhere in the system.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The correction-trigger signal contains consequential noise.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve noise-to-reversal direction.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The trigger noise induces reversals in corrective action.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve repeated reversals rather than one mistaken correction.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The induced correction reversals recur.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}], "predicate": "A noisy correction-trigger signal induces repeated reversals of corrective action.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "noisy correction trigger causes recurrent reversals", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P087-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Oscillation can be deterministic and noise-free.", "slug": "oscillation"}], "residual_id": "r:oscillation_damping:b045_a15_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b045_a15_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Noisy trigger signal. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Noisy trigger signal"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Oscillation can be deterministic and noise-free.", "slug": "oscillation"}], "normalized_requirement": "The correction trigger is noisy enough to induce repeated reversals.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The correction trigger is noisy enough to induce repeated reversals.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "High switching cost.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: High switching cost. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["High switching cost"]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "High switching cost"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 45, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-045", "ledger_sha256": "a59d7b1f99e10f7a31bbac9647e3780ac8a70c2b121adb7cb94aff52d5ff77fc"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Other-Agent State Model Calibration", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:other_agent_state_model_calibration", "slug": "other_agent_state_model_calibration"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 4 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A decision-maker must act toward, with, or through another agent whose relevant internal state is not directly observable. If the decision-maker routes behavior through their own knowledge, motives, assumptions, or ground-truth view, the action misfires: explanations are too advanced, offers ignore incentives, care misses distress, negotiation misreads constraints, interfaces assume user knowledge, and conflict escalates because each side treats its own perspective as universal.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A decision-maker must act toward, with, or through another agent whose relevant internal state is not directly observable. If the decision-maker routes behavior through their own knowledge, motives, assumptions, or ground-truth view, the action misfires: explanations are too advanced, offers ignore incentives, care misses distress, negotiation misreads constraints, interfaces assume user knowledge, and conflict escalates because each side treats its own perspective as universal."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires a separate updateable model of another agent's hidden belief, knowledge, attention, desire, or intention state.", "role_mapping": "Decision-maker -> modeller; other agent -> target; information states -> separately indexed world models.", "slug": "theory_of_mind", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b046_a01_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Different information states. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Different information states"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Theory Of Mind", "one_liner": "An agent maintains a separate, updateable model of another agent's hidden states and routes behaviour through that model rather than through ground truth.", "page_ref": "prime:theory_of_mind", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Decision-maker -> modeller; other agent -> target; information states -> separately indexed world models.", "slug": "theory_of_mind", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires a separate updateable model of another agent's hidden belief, knowledge, attention, desire, or intention state."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The decision-maker and target agent occupy separately indexed information or belief states.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Theory of mind can model a false belief or attention state without a hidden goal or constraint.", "slug": "theory_of_mind"}], "residual_id": "r:other_agent_state_model_calibration:b046_a01_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b046_a01_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Hidden goals or constraints. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Hidden goals or constraints"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Theory of mind can model a false belief or attention state without a hidden goal or constraint.", "slug": "theory_of_mind"}], "normalized_requirement": "The other agent has hidden goals or constraints that affect action.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The other agent has hidden goals or constraints that affect action.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Predictive pre-correction can model physical consequences and need not represent another agent's interpretation.", "slug": "feedforward"}], "residual_id": "r:other_agent_state_model_calibration:b046_a01_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b046_a01_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Action depends on anticipated interpretation. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Action depends on anticipated interpretation"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Predictive pre-correction can model physical consequences and need not represent another agent's interpretation.", "slug": "feedforward"}], "normalized_requirement": "Action success depends on anticipating how the other agent will interpret it.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Action success depends on anticipating how the other agent will interpret it.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A theory-of-mind instance can be accurate and need not begin from an observed projection failure.", "slug": "theory_of_mind"}], "residual_id": "r:other_agent_state_model_calibration:b046_a01_c4", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b046_a01_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Projection risk is high. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Projection risk is high"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A theory-of-mind instance can be accurate and need not begin from an observed projection failure.", "slug": "theory_of_mind"}], "normalized_requirement": "Projecting the modeller's own state onto the other agent would create material error.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Projecting the modeller's own state onto the other agent would create material error.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Repeated interaction enables updating.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: Repeated interaction enables updating. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Repeated interaction enables updating"]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Repeated interaction enables updating"}, {"display_text": "Ethical stakes matter.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Ethical stakes matter. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Ethical stakes matter"]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Ethical stakes matter"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 46, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-046", "ledger_sha256": "79f3b304aa068abc86911603b53ae99476514ab9d6e98d2a99b1a547da6e2be4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Outcome-Attractor Pathway Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:outcome_attractor_pathway_design", "slug": "outcome_attractor_pathway_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The system needs diverse starting states to reach a common stable outcome, but current design either\nover-standardizes the route or permits path variation without a reliable endpoint convergence test.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "The system needs diverse starting states to reach a common stable outcome, but current design either over-standardizes the route or permits path variation without a reliable endpoint convergence test."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires diverse starts, distinct trajectories, a shared endpoint, and a basin of convergence.", "role_mapping": "Participants -> starting states; routes -> trajectories; shared condition -> end-state.", "slug": "multi_path_convergence", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b046_a02_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Participants, components, cases, or subsystems begin from materially different states but must end in a shared operating condition, capability, format, decision state, or service state. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Participants, components, cases, or subsystems begin from materially different states but must end in a shared operating condition, capability, format, decision state, or service state."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Multi Path Convergence", "one_liner": "Multiple distinct trajectories from different starts arrive at the same end-state, with the destination doing the work.", "page_ref": "prime:multi_path_convergence", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Participants -> starting states; routes -> trajectories; shared condition -> end-state.", "slug": "multi_path_convergence", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires diverse starts, distinct trajectories, a shared endpoint, and a basin of convergence."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Different starting states and paths must converge on one shared end-state.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P087-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a single mandated pathway rather than several optional routes.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A system prescribes one route toward a desired outcome.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the prescribed-route-to-failure direction.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The single-route prescription causes the selected failure.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires the prescribed route to exclude some starts.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The route excludes some starting states.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires the prescribed route to waste local knowledge.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The route wastes local knowledge.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires the prescribed route to create bottlenecks.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The route creates bottlenecks.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires the prescribed route to fail when context varies.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The route fails under context variation.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "One prescribed route causes one listed failure across varied starting states or contexts.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "single prescribed route causes pathway failure", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P087-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Convergence can already occur through multiple paths without a failed prescribed route.", "slug": "multi_path_convergence"}], "residual_id": "r:outcome_attractor_pathway_design:b046_a02_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b046_a02_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A single prescribed route excludes some starts, wastes local knowledge, creates bottlenecks, or fails under context variation. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A single prescribed route excludes some starts, wastes local knowledge, creates bottlenecks, or fails under context variation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Convergence can already occur through multiple paths without a failed prescribed route.", "slug": "multi_path_convergence"}], "normalized_requirement": "One prescribed route excludes starts, wastes local knowledge, bottlenecks, or fails under context variation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "One prescribed route excludes starts, wastes local knowledge, bottlenecks, or fails under context variation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid convergence pattern can have known and verified endpoint invariants.", "slug": "multi_path_convergence"}], "residual_id": "r:outcome_attractor_pathway_design:b046_a02_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b046_a02_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Multiple routes already exist informally, but leaders cannot tell which ones preserve the required endpoint invariants. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Multiple routes already exist informally, but leaders cannot tell which ones preserve the required endpoint invariants."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid convergence pattern can have known and verified endpoint invariants.", "slug": "multi_path_convergence"}], "normalized_requirement": "Informal routes exist but their endpoint invariants are not validated.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Informal routes exist but their endpoint invariants are not validated.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record directs system trajectories by changing basin geometry around stable states.", "role_mapping": "Target state -> attractor; intermediate conditions -> basin boundary; settling paths -> trajectories.", "slug": "attractor_selection_and_basin_control", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b046_a02_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A target state behaves like an attractor: once intermediate conditions are arranged correctly, many trajectories tend to settle there without constant central steering. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A target state behaves like an attractor: once intermediate conditions are arranged correctly, many trajectories tend to settle there without constant central steering."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Attractor Selection and Basin Control", "one_liner": "System dynamics directed toward stable states via basin manipulation.", "page_ref": "prime:attractor_selection_and_basin_control", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Target state -> attractor; intermediate conditions -> basin boundary; settling paths -> trajectories.", "slug": "attractor_selection_and_basin_control", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record directs system trajectories by changing basin geometry around stable states."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Many trajectories settle into a target state after intermediate basin conditions are arranged.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Historical dependence need not prevent convergence on a common destination.", "slug": "path_dependence"}], "residual_id": "r:outcome_attractor_pathway_design:b046_a02_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b046_a02_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Path dependence matters, but the design goal is to prevent early differences from permanently preventing convergence. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Path dependence matters, but the design goal is to prevent early differences from permanently preventing convergence."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Historical dependence need not prevent convergence on a common destination.", "slug": "path_dependence"}], "normalized_requirement": "Early path differences could permanently prevent convergence.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Early path differences could permanently prevent convergence.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Local autonomy is desirable, but the destination must remain common enough for interoperability, fairness, safety, compliance, or coordination.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "route freedom supports adaptation, but it can erode the common endpoint unless the destination and basin. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: Local autonomy is desirable, but the destination must remain common enough for interoperability, fairness, safety, compliance, or coordination. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Local autonomy is desirable, but the destination must remain common enough for interoperability, fairness, safety, compliance, or coordination.", "route freedom supports adaptation, but it can erode the common endpoint unless the destination and basin"]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Local autonomy is desirable, but the destination must remain common enough for interoperability, fairness, safety, compliance, or coordination."}, {"display_text": "The system needs flexible pathways, not merely a generic feedback loop or a downselection funnel.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: The system needs flexible pathways, not merely a generic feedback loop or a downselection funnel. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The system needs flexible pathways, not merely a generic feedback loop or a downselection funnel."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "The system needs flexible pathways, not merely a generic feedback loop or a downselection funnel."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 46, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-046", "ledger_sha256": "79f3b304aa068abc86911603b53ae99476514ab9d6e98d2a99b1a547da6e2be4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Outcome Responsibility Attribution Calibration", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:outcome_responsibility_attribution_calibration", "slug": "outcome_responsibility_attribution_calibration"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A positive or negative outcome has occurred, and agents are being credited or blamed before the attribution question has been decomposed. Visible actors, last actors, high-status actors, disliked actors, formal role holders, or convenient scapegoats may be treated as responsible even when causal contribution, control, duty, knowledge, alternatives, and uncertainty have not been assessed. Conversely, responsibility may diffuse across a group so completely that no actor, role, or institution remains answerable.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A positive or negative outcome has occurred, and agents are being credited or blamed before the attribution question has been decomposed. Visible actors, last actors, high-status actors, disliked actors, formal role holders, or convenient scapegoats may be treated as responsible even when causal contribution, control, duty, knowledge, alternatives, and uncertainty have not been assessed. Conversely, responsibility may diffuse across a group so completely that no actor, role, or institution remains answerable."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact operation begins with an outcome and traces it back toward accountable agents.", "role_mapping": "Observed result -> outcome; agents -> candidate sources.", "slug": "responsibility_attribution", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b046_a03_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A harmful, successful, failed, or contested outcome needs to be linked to one or more agents. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A harmful, successful, failed, or contested outcome needs to be linked to one or more agents."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Responsibility Attribution", "one_liner": "Assigning credit or blame for an outcome to a particular agent.", "page_ref": "prime:responsibility_attribution", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Observed result -> outcome; agents -> candidate sources.", "slug": "responsibility_attribution", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact operation begins with an outcome and traces it back toward accountable agents."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "An observed outcome must be linked back to one or more agents.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record supports weighted allocation across multiple causal contributors.", "role_mapping": "Agents or roles -> contributing sources; modes -> causal pathways.", "slug": "responsibility_attribution", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b046_a03_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Multiple agents, roles, teams, institutions, or systems contributed through action, omission, approval, design, maintenance, or oversight. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Multiple agents, roles, teams, institutions, or systems contributed through action, omission, approval, design, maintenance, or oversight."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Responsibility Attribution", "one_liner": "Assigning credit or blame for an outcome to a particular agent.", "page_ref": "prime:responsibility_attribution", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Agents or roles -> contributing sources; modes -> causal pathways.", "slug": "responsibility_attribution", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record supports weighted allocation across multiple causal contributors."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Several agents or institutions contributed through action, omission, approval, design, maintenance, or oversight.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A mature attribution can perform the gates before naming anyone and need not contain premature singling out.", "slug": "responsibility_attribution"}], "residual_id": "r:outcome_responsibility_attribution_calibration:b046_a03_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b046_a03_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A salient actor is being singled out before causal contribution and controllability are established. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A salient actor is being singled out before causal contribution and controllability are established."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A mature attribution can perform the gates before naming anyone and need not contain premature singling out.", "slug": "responsibility_attribution"}], "normalized_requirement": "A salient actor is singled out before contribution and controllability are established.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A salient actor is singled out before contribution and controllability are established.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The attribution operation can concern one agent with no group simplification risk.", "slug": "responsibility_attribution"}], "residual_id": "r:outcome_responsibility_attribution_calibration:b046_a03_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b046_a03_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A group outcome risks responsibility diffusion, scapegoating, hero attribution, or great-man simplification. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A group outcome risks responsibility diffusion, scapegoating, hero attribution, or great-man simplification."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The attribution operation can concern one agent with no group simplification risk.", "slug": "responsibility_attribution"}], "normalized_requirement": "A group outcome risks diffusion, scapegoating, hero attribution, or great-person simplification.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A group outcome risks diffusion, scapegoating, hero attribution, or great-person simplification.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Responsibility can be entirely action-based and need not compare omission with action.", "slug": "responsibility_attribution"}], "residual_id": "r:outcome_responsibility_attribution_calibration:b046_a03_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b046_a03_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: An omission, non-escalation, failure to prevent, or failure to maintain may matter as much as a visible action. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["An omission, non-escalation, failure to prevent, or failure to maintain may matter as much as a visible action."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Responsibility can be entirely action-based and need not compare omission with action.", "slug": "responsibility_attribution"}], "normalized_requirement": "An omission or failure to prevent may matter as much as a visible action.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "An omission or failure to prevent may matter as much as a visible action.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Credit, blame, authorship, liability, discipline, remediation, compensation, reward, or reputation depends on the attribution.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A positive or negative outcome has occurred, and agents are being credited or blamed before the attribution question has been decomposed. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Credit, blame, authorship, liability, discipline, remediation, compensation, reward, or reputation depends on the attribution. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Credit, blame, authorship, liability, discipline, remediation, compensation, reward, or reputation depends on the attribution.", "A positive or negative outcome has occurred, and agents are being credited or blamed before the attribution question has been decomposed."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "Credit, blame, authorship, liability, discipline, remediation, compensation, reward, or reputation depends on the attribution."}, {"display_text": "Downstream accountability, repair, punishment, recognition, or learning will be shaped by the attribution record.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Responsibility must be attributable enough to enable learning, repair, recognition, and justice, but not so compressed that complex causality becomes scapegoating or so diffused that accountability disappears. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Downstream accountability, repair, punishment, recognition, or learning will be shaped by the attribution record. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Downstream accountability, repair, punishment, recognition, or learning will be shaped by the attribution record.", "Responsibility must be attributable enough to enable learning, repair, recognition, and justice, but not so compressed that complex causality becomes scapegoating or so diffused that accountability disappears."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "Downstream accountability, repair, punishment, recognition, or learning will be shaped by the attribution record."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 46, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-046", "ledger_sha256": "79f3b304aa068abc86911603b53ae99476514ab9d6e98d2a99b1a547da6e2be4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Outside-Authority Influence Channel Mapping", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:outside_authority_influence_channel_mapping", "slug": "outside_authority_influence_channel_mapping"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 4 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A person, institution, organization, jurisdiction, board, research group, platform, or decision body formally owns final authority within a domain, but external actors can still shape choices through informal channels that are not visible in the formal authority structure.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A person, institution, organization, jurisdiction, board, research group, platform, or decision body formally owns final authority within a domain, but external actors can still shape choices through informal channels that are not visible in the formal authority structure."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record assigns final recognized authority inside a bounded jurisdiction.", "role_mapping": "Decision domain -> jurisdiction; final owner -> sovereign authority.", "slug": "sovereignty", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b046_a04_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A decision domain has a declared sovereign, independent, delegated, or protected final authority boundary. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A decision domain has a declared sovereign, independent, delegated, or protected final authority boundary."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Sovereignty", "one_liner": "Supreme authority.", "page_ref": "prime:sovereignty", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Decision domain -> jurisdiction; final owner -> sovereign authority.", "slug": "sovereignty", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record assigns final recognized authority inside a bounded jurisdiction."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A decision domain has a declared protected final-authority boundary.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Bargaining power can belong to a formal rights-holder or internal party and does not entail an outside-authority relation.", "slug": "bargaining_power"}], "residual_id": "r:outside_authority_influence_channel_mapping:b046_a04_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b046_a04_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: External actors lack formal decision rights but have funding, access, expertise, reputation, network position, infrastructure control, exit power, regulatory pressure, or social leverage. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["External actors lack formal decision rights but have funding, access, expertise, reputation, network position, infrastructure control, exit power, regulatory pressure, or social leverage."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Bargaining power can belong to a formal rights-holder or internal party and does not entail an outside-authority relation.", "slug": "bargaining_power"}], "normalized_requirement": "External actors without formal rights possess material leverage over the authority holder.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "External actors without formal rights possess material leverage over the authority holder.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P087-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a formal governance representation.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A formal governance chart represents authority or decision structure.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an actual observed outcome, delay, reversal, or non-decision.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The selected governance outcome is observed in the represented system.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve explanatory insufficiency relative to the observation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The formal chart explains the observed outcome inadequately.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires an observed decision.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The under-explained outcome is a decision.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires an observed delay.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The under-explained outcome is a delay.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires an observed reversal.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The under-explained outcome is a reversal.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires an observed non-decision.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The under-explained outcome is a non-decision.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Formal governance charts do not sufficiently explain one listed observed governance outcome.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "formal governance structure under-explains observed outcomes", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P087-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A governance architecture can accurately explain decisions and need not conceal an informal influence channel.", "slug": "governance"}], "residual_id": "r:outside_authority_influence_channel_mapping:b046_a04_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b046_a04_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Formal governance charts under-explain observed decisions, delays, reversals, or non-decisions. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Formal governance charts under-explain observed decisions, delays, reversals, or non-decisions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A governance architecture can accurately explain decisions and need not conceal an informal influence channel.", "slug": "governance"}], "normalized_requirement": "Formal governance charts under-explain observed decisions or non-decisions.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Formal governance charts under-explain observed decisions or non-decisions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Leverage can arise without resource or reputation dependence and may include formal command rights.", "slug": "bargaining_power"}], "residual_id": "r:outside_authority_influence_channel_mapping:b046_a04_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b046_a04_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Resource dependencies or reputational dependencies make refusal costly even when outside actors cannot command compliance. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Resource dependencies or reputational dependencies make refusal costly even when outside actors cannot command compliance."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Leverage can arise without resource or reputation dependence and may include formal command rights.", "slug": "bargaining_power"}], "normalized_requirement": "Resource or reputation dependence makes refusal costly despite absent command authority.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Resource or reputation dependence makes refusal costly despite absent command authority.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The system needs to distinguish legitimate consultation, persuasion, and stakeholder input from hidden override or capture.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: The system needs to distinguish legitimate consultation, persuasion, and stakeholder input from hidden override or capture. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The system needs to distinguish legitimate consultation, persuasion, and stakeholder input from hidden override or capture."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "The system needs to distinguish legitimate consultation, persuasion, and stakeholder input from hidden override or capture."}, {"display_text": "Auditors, stewards, or decision owners need a structured account of who can shape a decision and by what route.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A person, institution, organization, jurisdiction, board, research group, platform, or decision body formally owns final authority within a domain, but external actors can still shape choices through informal channels that are not visible in the formal authority structure. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: Auditors, stewards, or decision owners need a structured account of who can shape a decision and by what route. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Auditors, stewards, or decision owners need a structured account of who can shape a decision and by what route.", "A person, institution, organization, jurisdiction, board, research group, platform, or decision body formally owns final authority within a domain, but external actors can still shape choices through informal channels that are not visible in the formal authority structure."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Auditors, stewards, or decision owners need a structured account of who can shape a decision and by what route."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 46, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-046", "ledger_sha256": "79f3b304aa068abc86911603b53ae99476514ab9d6e98d2a99b1a547da6e2be4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Over-Scaling Guardrail", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:over_scaling_guardrail", "slug": "over_scaling_guardrail"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 3 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a maturity mismatch. Demand, ambition, funding, or mandate pushes the front of the system to grow faster than the rest of the system can support.\n\nThe visible growth vector may be customer count, locations, staff, sites, students, patients, transactions, service regions, traffic, data volume, or implementation batches. The hidden lag may be support capacity, incident response, training, supervision, documentation, quality assurance, audit, supply, compliance, escalation, or shared practice.\n\nWhen the mismatch is ignored, early success becomes brittle. The system looks larger, but it becomes less controllable, less reliable, and less able to preserve its original quality.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system has a path to grow in volume, reach, headcount, locations, users, transactions, or complexity, but the quality, governance, support, cultural transmission, or control systems required to sustain that scale are not yet mature enough."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Overextension requires frontier demand outrunning backbone supply but not an external growth pressure or immature support program.", "slug": "operational_overextension"}], "residual_id": "r:over_scaling_guardrail:b046_a05_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b046_a05_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Growth pressure is real: market demand, political mandate, funding, adoption, competitive pressure, or internal goals push expansion faster than support systems can mature. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Growth pressure is real: market demand, political mandate, funding, adoption, competitive pressure, or internal goals push expansion faster than support systems can mature."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Overextension requires frontier demand outrunning backbone supply but not an external growth pressure or immature support program.", "slug": "operational_overextension"}], "normalized_requirement": "Demand or mandate pushes growth faster than support systems mature.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Demand or mandate pushes growth faster than support systems mature.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Rising unit cost at scale does not require early success or an inference that conditions remain stable.", "slug": "diseconomies_of_scale"}], "residual_id": "r:over_scaling_guardrail:b046_a05_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b046_a05_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Early success is being generalized to a larger scale even though the larger scale changes the operating conditions. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Early success is being generalized to a larger scale even though the larger scale changes the operating conditions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Rising unit cost at scale does not require early success or an inference that conditions remain stable.", "slug": "diseconomies_of_scale"}], "normalized_requirement": "Early success is generalized to a scale that changes operating conditions.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Early success is generalized to a scale that changes operating conditions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires a frontier of reach whose demand outruns the sustaining backbone.", "role_mapping": "Visible growth -> frontier; support capacity -> backbone; lag -> worsening demand-supply ratio.", "slug": "operational_overextension", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b046_a05_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Quality assurance, incident response, oversight, training, onboarding, supervision, compliance, moderation, support, or supply capacity lags behind visible growth capacity. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Quality assurance, incident response, oversight, training, onboarding, supervision, compliance, moderation, support, or supply capacity lags behind visible growth capacity."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Operational Overextension", "one_liner": "A system advances a frontier of activity faster than the supporting backbone that sustains it can keep up, so the leading edge becomes brittle and fails on its next shock — the failure lying in the frontier-to-backbone ratio, not the frontier itself.", "page_ref": "prime:operational_overextension", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Visible growth -> frontier; support capacity -> backbone; lag -> worsening demand-supply ratio.", "slug": "operational_overextension", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires a frontier of reach whose demand outruns the sustaining backbone."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Support, oversight, training, compliance, or recovery capacity lags behind visible growth.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The cost of scaling too quickly is high: quality collapse, safety exposure, loss of trust, ungovernable operations, staff burnout, culture dilution, fairness drift, or expensive rollback.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially appropriate when the cost of premature scaling is not merely inefficiency but quality collapse, safety exposure, loss of trust, governance failure, staff burnout, culture dilution, or expensive rollback. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The cost of scaling too quickly is high: quality collapse, safety exposure, loss of trust, ungovernable operations, staff burnout, culture dilution, fairness drift, or expensive rollback. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The cost of scaling too quickly is high: quality collapse, safety exposure, loss of trust, ungovernable operations, staff burnout, culture dilution, fairness drift, or expensive rollback.", "It is especially appropriate when the cost of premature scaling is not merely inefficiency but quality collapse, safety exposure, loss of trust, governance failure, staff burnout, culture dilution, or expensive rollback."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The cost of scaling too quickly is high: quality collapse, safety exposure, loss of trust, ungovernable operations, staff burnout, culture dilution, fairness drift, or expensive rollback."}, {"display_text": "A staged or capped path is possible; the system can grow in increments instead of treating expansion as all-or-nothing.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system has a path to grow in volume, reach, headcount, locations, users, transactions, or complexity, but the quality, governance, support, cultural transmission, or control systems required to sustain that scale are not yet mature enough. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: A staged or capped path is possible; the system can grow in increments instead of treating expansion as all-or-nothing. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A staged or capped path is possible; the system can grow in increments instead of treating expansion as all-or-nothing.", "A system has a path to grow in volume, reach, headcount, locations, users, transactions, or complexity, but the quality, governance, support, cultural transmission, or control systems required to sustain that scale are not yet mature enough."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "A staged or capped path is possible; the system can grow in increments instead of treating expansion as all-or-nothing."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 46, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-046", "ledger_sha256": "79f3b304aa068abc86911603b53ae99476514ab9d6e98d2a99b1a547da6e2be4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Overcommitment Prevention", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:overcommitment_prevention", "slug": "overcommitment_prevention"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 6, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a mismatch between the commitment ledger and real capacity. Promises can be created quickly: someone accepts a deadline, adds a roadmap item, books a meeting, signs a contract, approves a budget line, or announces a policy. Capacity changes more slowly and is usually already partially consumed by maintenance, recovery, coordination, existing obligations, and uncertainty.\n\nOvercommitment becomes chronic when the system has no reliable distinction between a request, a wish, a queue item, an option, and an accepted obligation. Backlogs become implicit promises. Calendars become ungoverned commitment ledgers. Budgets become encumbered before tradeoffs are visible. People keep saying yes because refusal is socially or politically expensive, while the cost of acceptance is deferred until failure.\n\nThe deeper tension is that saying yes preserves short-term goodwill, ambition, revenue, and optionality, but every yes consumes scarce future capacity. When the system hides that consumption, it creates promises that cannot coexist.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "The system takes on commitments faster than resources, attention, or time can support."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P087-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve acceptance of capacity-consuming commitments.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A person or system accepts new obligations that consume completion capacity.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the capacity creation-or-release rate as the comparison baseline without requiring a positive capacity event.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The system has a capacity creation-or-release rate as the comparison baseline, and that rate may be zero.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the directional rate imbalance and allow the comparison baseline to be zero.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The obligation-acceptance rate exceeds the capacity creation-or-release baseline, including when that baseline is zero.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve contemporaneous inflow and capacity adjustment rather than unrelated historical quantities.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The rate imbalance persists over the period in which obligations accumulate.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "New obligations are accepted faster than capacity is created or freed.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "obligation acceptance rate exceeds capacity-release rate", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P087-C13-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A credible commitment can be fully resourced and does not require an excessive arrival rate.", "slug": "credible_commitment"}], "residual_id": "r:overcommitment_prevention:b046_a06_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b046_a06_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: New obligations, projects, meetings, contracts, policies, or promises are accepted faster than capacity can be created or freed. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["New obligations, projects, meetings, contracts, policies, or promises are accepted faster than capacity can be created or freed."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A credible commitment can be fully resourced and does not require an excessive arrival rate.", "slug": "credible_commitment"}], "normalized_requirement": "New obligations are accepted faster than capacity is created or freed.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "New obligations are accepted faster than capacity is created or freed.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P087-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a plurality large enough to constitute material latent load.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The focal actor has many soft promises.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve exclusion from load accounting, not mere low priority within an inclusive account.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Those promises are not counted as real load while they remain soft.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the urgency-triggered transition in accounting status.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The promises become counted only when they become urgent.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires an organization to hold the uncounted soft promises.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The focal actor is an organization.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a person to hold the uncounted soft promises.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The focal actor is a person.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "An organization or person has many soft promises that remain uncounted as load until urgency arises.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "many soft promises are excluded from load accounting until urgent", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P087-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A known unowned risk need not be a promise or become urgent.", "slug": "unowned_known_risk"}], "residual_id": "r:overcommitment_prevention:b046_a06_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b046_a06_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The organization or person has many soft promises that are not counted as real load until they become urgent. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The organization or person has many soft promises that are not counted as real load until they become urgent."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A known unowned risk need not be a promise or become urgent.", "slug": "unowned_known_risk"}], "normalized_requirement": "Soft promises remain uncounted until they become urgent.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Soft promises remain uncounted until they become urgent.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A cross-boundary subsidy transfers cost but does not require promise authority or capacity overload.", "slug": "cross_boundary_subsidy"}], "residual_id": "r:overcommitment_prevention:b046_a06_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b046_a06_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Demand intake is separated from fulfillment capacity, so one actor can promise what another actor must deliver. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Demand intake is separated from fulfillment capacity, so one actor can promise what another actor must deliver."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A cross-boundary subsidy transfers cost but does not require promise authority or capacity overload.", "slug": "cross_boundary_subsidy"}], "normalized_requirement": "One actor can promise work that another actor's finite capacity must fulfill.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "One actor can promise work that another actor's finite capacity must fulfill.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P087-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve accepted commitments and their representation in planning or accounting artifacts.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A system has accepted obligations recorded in the selected representation.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve realistic completion capacity as the comparison baseline.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The system has a credible completion capacity for those obligations.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve excess relative to credible completion, not merely a large workload.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The represented accepted obligations exceed what the system can credibly complete.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a backlog containing the excess accepted obligations.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The obligations are represented in a backlog.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a calendar containing the excess accepted obligations.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The obligations are represented in a calendar.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a budget containing the excess accepted obligations.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The obligations are represented in a budget.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a roadmap containing the excess accepted obligations.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The obligations are represented in a roadmap.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A listed planning or accounting representation contains more accepted obligations than the system can credibly complete.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "accepted obligations exceed credible completion capacity", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P087-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Environmental carrying capacity does not entail a stock of promises or obligations.", "slug": "carrying_capacity"}], "residual_id": "r:overcommitment_prevention:b046_a06_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b046_a06_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Backlogs, calendars, budgets, or roadmaps contain more accepted obligations than the system can complete credibly. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Backlogs, calendars, budgets, or roadmaps contain more accepted obligations than the system can complete credibly."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Environmental carrying capacity does not entail a stock of promises or obligations.", "slug": "carrying_capacity"}], "normalized_requirement": "Accepted obligations exceed the system's credible completion capacity.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Accepted obligations exceed the system's credible completion capacity.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A credible commitment can be canceled under its declared exit rule or can remain one stable obligation.", "slug": "credible_commitment"}], "residual_id": "r:overcommitment_prevention:b046_a06_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b046_a06_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Existing commitments are rarely canceled or rescoped when new commitments are added. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Existing commitments are rarely canceled or rescoped when new commitments are added."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A credible commitment can be canceled under its declared exit rule or can remain one stable obligation.", "slug": "credible_commitment"}], "normalized_requirement": "Old commitments are rarely canceled or rescoped when new ones are added.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Old commitments are rarely canceled or rescoped when new ones are added.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An explanatory overlay can mask many forms of structural debt and need not involve overcommitment.", "slug": "explanatory_overlay_masking_structural_debt"}], "residual_id": "r:overcommitment_prevention:b046_a06_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b046_a06_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Overload is explained as execution failure even though the commitment system made success impossible. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Overload is explained as execution failure even though the commitment system made success impossible."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An explanatory overlay can mask many forms of structural debt and need not involve overcommitment.", "slug": "explanatory_overlay_masking_structural_debt"}], "normalized_requirement": "Commitment-system overload is misattributed to execution failure.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Commitment-system overload is misattributed to execution failure.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 46, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-046", "ledger_sha256": "79f3b304aa068abc86911603b53ae99476514ab9d6e98d2a99b1a547da6e2be4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Overlap Exclusion Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:overlap_exclusion_design", "slug": "overlap_exclusion_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 4 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system relies on collections, roles, evidence streams, states, zones, or categories being separate, but the no-shared-member condition is unstated, untested, or eroded by ambiguous identity, overlapping assignment, or later recombination.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system relies on collections, roles, evidence streams, states, zones, or categories being separate, but the no-shared-member condition is unstated, untested, or eroded by ambiguous identity, overlapping assignment, or later recombination."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Pairwise disjoint sets provide at-most-one membership but do not require every element to belong to some set.", "slug": "disjointness"}], "residual_id": "r:overlap_exclusion_design:b046_a07_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b046_a07_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: An element must belong to one and only one lane, role, state, cohort, dataset, zone, or bucket. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["An element must belong to one and only one lane, role, state, cohort, dataset, zone, or bucket."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Pairwise disjoint sets provide at-most-one membership but do not require every element to belong to some set.", "slug": "disjointness"}], "normalized_requirement": "Each element must be assigned to exactly one lane, role, state, cohort, dataset, zone, or bucket.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Each element must be assigned to exactly one lane, role, state, cohort, dataset, zone, or bucket.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Disjointness is a set relation and does not entail stakes or a failure consequence.", "slug": "disjointness"}], "residual_id": "r:overlap_exclusion_design:b046_a07_c2", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b046_a07_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Overlap would cause double counting, contamination, conflict of interest, leakage, unsafe coactivation, or invalid inference. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Overlap would cause double counting, contamination, conflict of interest, leakage, unsafe coactivation, or invalid inference."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Disjointness is a set relation and does not entail stakes or a failure consequence.", "slug": "disjointness"}], "normalized_requirement": "Shared membership would cause double counting, contamination, conflict, leakage, or invalid inference.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Shared membership would cause double counting, contamination, conflict, leakage, or invalid inference.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P088-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve collection or category membership as the affected relation.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Membership is assigned across collections or categories in which shared membership can occur.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve possibility or plausibility of overlap, not require observed overlap.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Shared membership is plausible rather than asserted to be certain.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail that the selected condition creates or increases the possibility of shared membership.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The selected identity or classification condition makes shared membership plausible.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a boundary case to make shared membership plausible.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The selected condition is a boundary case.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires an alias to make shared membership plausible.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The selected condition is an alias.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a duplicate to make shared membership plausible.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The selected condition is a duplicate.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires an identifier change to make shared membership plausible.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The selected condition is a changing identifier.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "One listed identity or classification condition makes shared collection membership plausible.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "identity or classification condition makes shared membership plausible", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P088-C02-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Two sets can be known to overlap or be exactly disjoint with stable identifiers; ambiguity is not required.", "slug": "disjointness"}], "residual_id": "r:overlap_exclusion_design:b046_a07_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b046_a07_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Boundary cases, aliases, duplicates, or changing identifiers make shared membership plausible. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Boundary cases, aliases, duplicates, or changing identifiers make shared membership plausible."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Two sets can be known to overlap or be exactly disjoint with stable identifiers; ambiguity is not required.", "slug": "disjointness"}], "normalized_requirement": "Aliases, duplicates, boundary cases, or changing identifiers make overlap plausible.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Aliases, duplicates, boundary cases, or changing identifiers make overlap plausible.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires the intersection of the two sets to be empty.", "role_mapping": "Collections -> sets; no common member -> empty intersection; decision assumption -> disjointness invariant.", "slug": "disjointness", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b046_a07_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A downstream decision assumes that two collections have no common member. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A downstream decision assumes that two collections have no common member."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Disjointness", "one_liner": "Two or more populated collections share no element.", "page_ref": "prime:disjointness", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Collections -> sets; no common member -> empty intersection; decision assumption -> disjointness invariant.", "slug": "disjointness", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires the intersection of the two sets to be empty."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A downstream decision assumes two collections have no common member.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Separate teams, databases, rules, or jurisdictions maintain membership independently.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Disjointness is a strong structural guarantee, but ordinary operating systems are porous: identity changes, membership rules drift, exceptions accumulate, and downstream integrations reconnect what upstream design separated. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Separate teams, databases, rules, or jurisdictions maintain membership independently. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Separate teams, databases, rules, or jurisdictions maintain membership independently.", "Disjointness is a strong structural guarantee, but ordinary operating systems are porous: identity changes, membership rules drift, exceptions accumulate, and downstream integrations reconnect what upstream design separated."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Separate teams, databases, rules, or jurisdictions maintain membership independently."}, {"display_text": "An upstream partition, complement, holdout, or access-control scheme needs a no-overlap guarantee before use.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Disjointness is a strong structural guarantee, but ordinary operating systems are porous: identity changes, membership rules drift, exceptions accumulate, and downstream integrations reconnect what upstream design separated. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: An upstream partition, complement, holdout, or access-control scheme needs a no-overlap guarantee before use. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["An upstream partition, complement, holdout, or access-control scheme needs a no-overlap guarantee before use.", "Disjointness is a strong structural guarantee, but ordinary operating systems are porous: identity changes, membership rules drift, exceptions accumulate, and downstream integrations reconnect what upstream design separated."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "An upstream partition, complement, holdout, or access-control scheme needs a no-overlap guarantee before use."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 46, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-046", "ledger_sha256": "79f3b304aa068abc86911603b53ae99476514ab9d6e98d2a99b1a547da6e2be4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Overoptimization Guardrail", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:overoptimization_guardrail", "slug": "overoptimization_guardrail"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 3 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a mismatch between the narrow optimization target and the broader system purpose. Early optimization often removes waste and improves real outcomes. Later optimization can become extractive: the system squeezes out tiny gains by using up slack, adding fragile special cases, gaming a metric, overfitting to a benchmark, shifting burden to hidden groups, or making the system harder to understand and govern.\n\nThe danger is that the target still looks successful. A model score rises, a KPI improves, a cost falls, a throughput number increases, or a process becomes more efficient. But the surrounding system loses robustness, fairness, interpretability, maintainability, safety, trust, or adaptability. The archetype identifies this as a decreasing-gains problem with side effects: the next gain is no longer automatically worth the damage required to obtain it.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system continues optimizing a narrow target after marginal gains have fallen, while side effects rise in robustness, fairness, complexity, safety, adaptability, maintainability, legitimacy, or human value. Because the optimized metric remains visible and improvable, the system keeps pushing even though the broader purpose is being degraded."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Shortcut learning can occur under fitting pressure but does not require an explicitly narrow target or ongoing optimization.", "slug": "shortcut_learning"}], "residual_id": "r:overoptimization_guardrail:b046_a08_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b046_a08_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A target, metric, objective, score, cost function, or performance criterion is being actively optimized. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A target, metric, objective, score, cost function, or performance criterion is being actively optimized."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Shortcut learning can occur under fitting pressure but does not require an explicitly narrow target or ongoing optimization.", "slug": "shortcut_learning"}], "normalized_requirement": "A narrow target or score is under active optimization pressure.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A narrow target or score is under active optimization pressure.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact pattern requires each added unit of effort to produce a smaller marginal gain than the previous unit.", "role_mapping": "Optimization effort -> incremental input; improvement -> marginal return.", "slug": "diminishing_incremental_gains", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b046_a08_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Additional optimization produces small, uncertain, local, or diminishing gains. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Additional optimization produces small, uncertain, local, or diminishing gains."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Diminishing Incremental Gains", "one_liner": "Reduced benefit per unit.", "page_ref": "prime:diminishing_incremental_gains", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Optimization effort -> incremental input; improvement -> marginal return.", "slug": "diminishing_incremental_gains", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact pattern requires each added unit of effort to produce a smaller marginal gain than the previous unit."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Additional optimization yields diminishing marginal improvement.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Overshoot can exceed a capacity and collapse without a separately measured target continuing to improve alongside side effects.", "slug": "overshoot_and_collapse"}], "residual_id": "r:overoptimization_guardrail:b046_a08_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b046_a08_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Side effects grow as the optimized target improves. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Side effects grow as the optimized target improves."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Overshoot can exceed a capacity and collapse without a separately measured target continuing to improve alongside side effects.", "slug": "overshoot_and_collapse"}], "normalized_requirement": "Side effects increase while the optimized target continues to improve.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Side effects increase while the optimized target continues to improve.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Some values must be preserved as constraints or review triggers.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: Some values must be preserved as constraints or review triggers. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Some values must be preserved as constraints or review triggers."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Some values must be preserved as constraints or review triggers."}, {"display_text": "A decision consequence exists after the guardrail fires.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this deployment constraint: A decision consequence exists after the guardrail fires. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A decision consequence exists after the guardrail fires."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "A decision consequence exists after the guardrail fires."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 46, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-046", "ledger_sha256": "79f3b304aa068abc86911603b53ae99476514ab9d6e98d2a99b1a547da6e2be4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Overshoot-Crash Load Management", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:overshoot_crash_load_management", "slug": "overshoot_crash_load_management"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Ordinary growth governance asks whether the next unit still creates value and whether current support can carry it. Overshoot-crash systems require a second question: **what happens if the accumulated stock unwinds together?** Without that lifecycle view, decision-makers capture the visible benefits of growth while cleanup, claims, decomposition, support debt, migration, disposal, or recovery work is exported to another team, institution, ecosystem, or future period.\n\n\nThe visible peak and the worst stress are often separated in time. That delay makes late action feel successful at first: the enabling input is reduced and the stock begins to fall. Yet the crash-created load may still be accelerating. The archetype closes that gap by linking pre-peak controls to a modeled and governed post-peak pathway.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A reinforcing input drives rapid growth of a stock that is beneficial, tolerated, or politically attractive while support is available. The stock approaches or exceeds a carrying, assimilation, governance, or service ceiling. When support fails or the stock begins to unwind, the decline converts accumulated quantity into a second load—decomposition demand, claims, defaults, cleanup, migration, support debt, disposal, disease, or social harm. Because that load is delayed and often correlated, removing the original input after the peak may not prevent worsening conditions. The system lacks a coordinated design that links pre-peak growth control to post-peak clearance, protected capacity, and recovery."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires reinforcing growth, delayed response, capacity exceedance, and subsequent collapse.", "role_mapping": "Growing quantity -> stock; delayed control -> delayed feedback; peak -> overshoot.", "slug": "overshoot_and_collapse", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b046_a09_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Growth is reinforcing or sufficiently rapid that delayed feedback can permit substantial overshoot before ordinary control responds. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Growth is reinforcing or sufficiently rapid that delayed feedback can permit substantial overshoot before ordinary control responds."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Overshoot and Collapse", "one_liner": "An enabling input that is beneficial at low levels crosses an assimilation ceiling and inverts into a self-amplifying degrading load, depleting a secondary resource and locking in a hysteretic worse regime that does not reverse when the input is removed.", "page_ref": "prime:overshoot_and_collapse", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Growing quantity -> stock; delayed control -> delayed feedback; peak -> overshoot.", "slug": "overshoot_and_collapse", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires reinforcing growth, delayed response, capacity exceedance, and subsequent collapse."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Rapid reinforcing growth and delayed feedback permit overshoot before control responds.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P088-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O11"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O12"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6", "O11"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6", "O12"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O7", "O11"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O7", "O12"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O8", "O11"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O8", "O12"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O9", "O11"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O9", "O12"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O10", "O11"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O10", "O12"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail stock formation from growth or accumulation.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A growing quantity forms an accumulated stock.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the temporal order from stock formation to later exit or unwind.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The selected exit process occurs later, after the stock has formed.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail that later stock exit creates work or stress, not merely co-occurs with it.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The stock's later selected exit process creates the selected material load.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve that the resulting load is consequential rather than negligible.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The resulting work or stress is material.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires death within the stock to create the material load.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The selected exit process is death.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires exit from the stock to create the material load.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The selected exit process is exit.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires default within the stock to create the material load.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The selected exit process is default.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires decomposition of the stock to create the material load.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The selected exit process is decomposition.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires retirement from the stock to create the material load.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "The selected exit process is retirement.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires obsolescence within the stock to create the material load.", "obligation_id": "O10", "statement": "The selected exit process is obsolescence.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires the later exit process to create material work.", "obligation_id": "O11", "statement": "The selected material load is work.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires the later exit process to create material stress.", "obligation_id": "O12", "statement": "The selected material load is stress.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A growing quantity forms a stock whose later selected exit process creates material work or material stress.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "stock growth converts later exits into material clearance load", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P088-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Turnover replaces or exits elements but need not create material secondary load.", "slug": "turnover"}], "residual_id": "r:overshoot_crash_load_management:b046_a09_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b046_a09_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The growing quantity forms a stock whose later death, exit, default, decomposition, retirement, or obsolescence creates material work or stress. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The growing quantity forms a stock whose later death, exit, default, decomposition, retirement, or obsolescence creates material work or stress."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Turnover replaces or exits elements but need not create material secondary load.", "slug": "turnover"}], "normalized_requirement": "A growing stock later converts death, exit, default, decomposition, retirement, or obsolescence into material work.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A growing stock later converts death, exit, default, decomposition, retirement, or obsolescence into material work.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A carrying ceiling constrains one supported population and does not require a separate clearance capacity.", "slug": "carrying_capacity"}], "residual_id": "r:overshoot_crash_load_management:b046_a09_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b046_a09_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Primary support capacity and secondary clearance or recovery capacity are finite, uncertain, unevenly distributed, or slow to replenish. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Primary support capacity and secondary clearance or recovery capacity are finite, uncertain, unevenly distributed, or slow to replenish."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A carrying ceiling constrains one supported population and does not require a separate clearance capacity.", "slug": "carrying_capacity"}], "normalized_requirement": "Primary support and secondary clearance capacity are finite or slow to replenish.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Primary support and secondary clearance capacity are finite or slow to replenish.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires a common stressor that correlates demand peaks and overwhelms a shared finite resource sized under independence.", "role_mapping": "Unwind -> correlating stressor; clearance consumers -> demand processes; shared capacity -> finite resource.", "slug": "correlated_capacity_demand", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b046_a09_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A correlated unwind can create a higher peak demand on oxygen, liquidity, staffing, treatment, disposal, remediation, or governance than the growth phase did. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A correlated unwind can create a higher peak demand on oxygen, liquidity, staffing, treatment, disposal, remediation, or governance than the growth phase did."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Correlated Capacity Demand", "one_liner": "When demands on a shared finite resource are tail-correlated rather than independent, capacity sized for independent peaks fails at the rare joint exceedance.", "page_ref": "prime:correlated_capacity_demand", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Unwind -> correlating stressor; clearance consumers -> demand processes; shared capacity -> finite resource.", "slug": "correlated_capacity_demand", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires a common stressor that correlates demand peaks and overwhelms a shared finite resource sized under independence."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A common unwind produces tail-correlated peak demand on shared clearance capacity.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The system can influence at least one of the following: enabling input, growth rate, stock size, timing of unwind, spatial or cohort correlation, clearance capacity, containment, or reentry.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use it when a reinforcing growth process accumulates a stock, a finite capacity sustains that stock, and the stock’s unwind creates a delayed load on another scarce resource. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: The system can influence at least one of the following: enabling input, growth rate, stock size, timing of unwind, spatial or cohort correlation, clearance capacity, containment, or reentry. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The system can influence at least one of the following: enabling input, growth rate, stock size, timing of unwind, spatial or cohort correlation, clearance capacity, containment, or reentry.", "Use it when a reinforcing growth process accumulates a stock, a finite capacity sustains that stock, and the stock’s unwind creates a delayed load on another scarce resource."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The system can influence at least one of the following: enabling input, growth rate, stock size, timing of unwind, spatial or cohort correlation, clearance capacity, containment, or reentry."}, {"display_text": "The consequences of waiting for certainty include hysteresis, irreversible damage, critical-function loss, or burden transfer to vulnerable parties.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The consequences of waiting for certainty include hysteresis, irreversible damage, critical-function loss, or burden transfer to vulnerable parties. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The consequences of waiting for certainty include hysteresis, irreversible damage, critical-function loss, or burden transfer to vulnerable parties."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The consequences of waiting for certainty include hysteresis, irreversible damage, critical-function loss, or burden transfer to vulnerable parties."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 46, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-046", "ledger_sha256": "79f3b304aa068abc86911603b53ae99476514ab9d6e98d2a99b1a547da6e2be4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Oversight Span Calibration", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:oversight_span_calibration", "slug": "oversight_span_calibration"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a mismatch between oversight demand and oversight capacity. Demand comes from the number of supervised items, but also from their variety, ambiguity, risk, novelty, emotional load, interdependence, and exception rate. Capacity comes from the overseer's attention, expertise, context, time, judgment, signal channels, and support structure.\n\nWhen the mismatch persists, the organization often misreads the failure. It may blame an individual overseer for missing a signal, blame local actors for not escalating, or blame a committee for slow decisions. Those failures may be real, but repeated patterns often indicate that the span itself is structurally unworkable.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Oversight quality deteriorates because the number, complexity, or variety of supervised items exceeds available attention and judgment capacity."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record defines a span threshold and quality-degradation curve as supervision load exceeds capacity.", "role_mapping": "Direct items -> sub-units; attention -> supervision capacity; growth -> span increase.", "slug": "oversight_capacity", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b046_a10_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Direct span has grown faster than supervisory capacity. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Direct span has grown faster than supervisory capacity"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Oversight Capacity", "one_liner": "Limits of supervision.", "page_ref": "prime:oversight_capacity", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Direct items -> sub-units; attention -> supervision capacity; growth -> span increase.", "slug": "oversight_capacity", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record defines a span threshold and quality-degradation curve as supervision load exceeds capacity."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Direct span grows faster than supervisory attention and judgment capacity.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A span can remain below its feasible threshold with no increasing misses.", "slug": "oversight_capacity"}], "residual_id": "r:oversight_span_calibration:b046_a10_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b046_a10_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It may blame an individual overseer for missing a signal, blame local actors for not escalating, or blame a committee for slow decisions. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Missed signals or late interventions are increasing.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Missed signals or late interventions are increasing", "It may blame an individual overseer for missing a signal, blame local actors for not escalating, or blame a committee for slow decisions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A span can remain below its feasible threshold with no increasing misses.", "slug": "oversight_capacity"}], "normalized_requirement": "Missed signals or late interventions are increasing.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Missed signals or late interventions are increasing.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime includes layering and delegation mechanisms and can be implemented safely.", "slug": "oversight_capacity"}], "residual_id": "r:oversight_span_calibration:b046_a10_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b046_a10_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Delegation is either absent or unsafe. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Delegation is either absent or unsafe"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime includes layering and delegation mechanisms and can be implemented safely.", "slug": "oversight_capacity"}], "normalized_requirement": "Delegation is absent or unsafe.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Delegation is absent or unsafe.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P088-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve dependence on particular people, not only on an interchangeable role or abstract resource.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Particular people perform a load-bearing oversight role.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail availability as a prerequisite for the oversight arrangement.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The oversight arrangement depends on those people's availability.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the extraordinary availability requirement.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The required availability is heroic or exceptional rather than ordinary.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve continuous availability rather than occasional participation.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The required availability is continuous.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "Oversight depends on the heroic continuous availability of particular people.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "oversight depends on exceptional continuous personal availability", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P088-C04-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A capacity limit can be managed with ordinary staffing and need not depend on a hero.", "slug": "oversight_capacity"}], "residual_id": "r:oversight_span_calibration:b046_a10_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b046_a10_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Oversight relies on heroic availability. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Oversight relies on heroic availability"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A capacity limit can be managed with ordinary staffing and need not depend on a hero.", "slug": "oversight_capacity"}], "normalized_requirement": "Oversight depends on heroic continuous availability of particular people.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Oversight depends on heroic continuous availability of particular people.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P088-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a governance forum as the capacity-bearing body and governance work as its demand.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A governance forum is responsible for a governance workload.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail demand greater than available governance capacity, not merely a busy forum.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The governance workload exceeds the forum's available attention or judgment capacity.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve overload or insufficiency rather than adequate spare capacity.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The forum is overloaded under that demand-capacity relation.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "The governance workload placed on a governance forum exceeds the forum's available attention or judgment capacity.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "governance workload exceeds forum capacity", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P088-C05-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Oversight capacity applies to any supervision relation and does not require a governance forum or actual overload.", "slug": "oversight_capacity"}], "residual_id": "r:oversight_span_calibration:b046_a10_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b046_a10_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Governance forums are overloaded. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Governance forums are overloaded"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_SYNTHESIS", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "With the institution fixed as a governance forum, an agenda-building instance cannot admit the vast candidate-issue space without exceeding its finite attention capacity.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Agenda Building", "one_liner": "Explain why some issues climb into an institution's finite attention while most do not — through a distributed multi-actor competition of entrepreneurs, focusing events, and amplification loops — so a docket reflects which ingredients aligned, not an objective ranking of importance.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:agenda_building", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "institution_is_governance_forum", "predicate": "The decision-making institution is the focal governance forum.", "rationale": "The exact DSA plus the emitted qualifier, if any, necessarily satisfies the selected complete DNF branch without role or direction laundering."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "agenda_building"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "institution_is_governance_forum"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "agenda_building", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P088-C05-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent reconciliation confirms the raw exact-record mapping under universal necessity. The DSA directly supplies the demand-capacity overload relation; one domain restriction selects a governance forum without introducing another mechanism or restating overload."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Governance forums are overloaded.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Complexity is unevenly distributed.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Complexity is unevenly distributed. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Complexity is unevenly distributed"]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "Complexity is unevenly distributed"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 46, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-046", "ledger_sha256": "79f3b304aa068abc86911603b53ae99476514ab9d6e98d2a99b1a547da6e2be4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Pair-Specific Arbitrary-Placement Calibration", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:pair_specific_arbitrary_placement_calibration", "slug": "pair_specific_arbitrary_placement_calibration"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 1 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 1}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Manufacturing tolerance is being used to guarantee a mapping that can be learned more\ncheaply after assembly. Relaxing placement without identity-bound calibration, however,\nmakes units inaccurate and makes stored corrections dangerously interchangeable.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Unit-specific placement, offset, gain, phase, or geometry variation defeats a universal mapping between an assembled pair."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "This branch preserves the complete remedy-free diagnostic route; goals, feasibility clauses, gates, deployment constraints, and supporting context remain outside the DNF."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "EXT001-C072", "dnf": [["EXT001-U072-O1"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"obligation_id": "EXT001-U072-O1", "predicate": "Unit-to-unit placement, offset, gain, phase, or geometry variation defeats a universal map."}], "predicate": "Unit-to-unit placement, offset, gain, phase, or geometry variation defeats a universal map.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Unit-to-unit placement, offset, gain, phase, or geometry variation defeats a universal map.", "unit_id": "EXT001-U072"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"catalog_exhaustion": "CONDITION_LEVEL", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Unit-to-unit placement, offset, gain, phase, or geometry variation defeats a universal map.", "slug": "distortion"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Unit-to-unit placement, offset, gain, phase, or geometry variation defeats a universal map.", "slug": "fixed_point"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Unit-to-unit placement, offset, gain, phase, or geometry variation defeats a universal map.", "slug": "universality"}], "residual_id": "EXT001:pair_specific_arbitrary_placement_calibration:C01", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding."}}, "condition_id": "ext001_pair_specific_arbitrary_placement_calibration_a01", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: Unit-to-unit placement, offset, gain, phase, or geometry variation defeats a universal map.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Unit-to-unit placement, offset, gain, phase, or geometry variation defeats a universal map."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Unit-to-unit placement, offset, gain, phase, or geometry variation defeats a universal map.", "slug": "distortion"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Unit-to-unit placement, offset, gain, phase, or geometry variation defeats a universal map.", "slug": "fixed_point"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Unit-to-unit placement, offset, gain, phase, or geometry variation defeats a universal map.", "slug": "universality"}], "normalized_requirement": "Unit-to-unit placement, offset, gain, phase, or geometry variation defeats a universal map.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Unit-to-unit placement, offset, gain, phase, or geometry variation defeats a universal map.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The assembled pair can be exercised against known reference states.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: The assembled pair can be exercised against known reference states. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The assembled pair can be exercised against known reference states.", "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "The assembled pair can be exercised against known reference states."}, {"display_text": "Calibration records can remain bound to the identity of the assembled pair.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: Calibration records can remain bound to the identity of the assembled pair. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Calibration records can remain bound to the identity of the assembled pair.", "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Calibration records can remain bound to the identity of the assembled pair."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"candidate_ledger_sha256": "96f72d2139077fd57bf795048ebef33b3fd574b20963170080ec916b5b3b92fe", "extension_id": "new-archetypes-extension-001", "ledger_id": "prime-production-v1.2-extension-001", "ledger_sha256": "9644520614744632d1d36da44b1acd77ce432852c6083eb871203521c166efce"}, "base_projection_sha256": "841e0c7f3cb8e8054475ad29a8a14745a416b4fc115559a44878b94292e673ec", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "ca09ed9fe1598ce7072755b530de5553f5ee0a7cd64ae82d9e4a4e2149a37788", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Pairwise Collision Risk Budgeting", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:pairwise_collision_risk_budgeting", "slug": "pairwise_collision_risk_budgeting"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system assigns many items into a finite namespace, code space, slot set, bucket set, or symbol inventory while assuming that collision risk grows linearly with occupancy or remains negligible until the space is visibly crowded.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system assigns many items into a finite namespace, code space, slot set, bucket set, or symbol inventory while assuming that collision risk grows linearly with occupancy or remains negligible until the space is visibly crowded."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires independent random filling of a finite outcome space.", "role_mapping": "Identifiers -> draws; codes -> outcomes; generation -> random filling.", "slug": "birthday_problem", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b046_a11_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Identifiers, tokens, hashes, codes, addresses, categories, or labels are generated randomly or quasi-randomly. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Identifiers, tokens, hashes, codes, addresses, categories, or labels are generated randomly or quasi-randomly."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Birthday Problem", "one_liner": "Pairwise collisions in a finite namespace become likely at the square root of its size, not half of it.", "page_ref": "prime:birthday_problem", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Identifiers -> draws; codes -> outcomes; generation -> random filling.", "slug": "birthday_problem", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires independent random filling of a finite outcome space."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Identifiers or codes are drawn randomly or quasi-randomly into a namespace.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A finite namespace of size K is mandatory.", "role_mapping": "Code inventory -> namespace; bounded format -> size K.", "slug": "birthday_problem", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b046_a11_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The namespace size is finite, bounded by format, memory, policy, human readability, or legacy compatibility. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The namespace size is finite, bounded by format, memory, policy, human readability, or legacy compatibility."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Birthday Problem", "one_liner": "Pairwise collisions in a finite namespace become likely at the square root of its size, not half of it.", "page_ref": "prime:birthday_problem", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Code inventory -> namespace; bounded format -> size K.", "slug": "birthday_problem", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A finite namespace of size K is mandatory."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The namespace has a finite bounded size.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's central error is treating pairwise collision risk as if it scaled linearly with occupancy rather than quadratically.", "role_mapping": "Apparent abundance -> K-versus-N intuition; any pair -> quadratic pair count.", "slug": "birthday_problem", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b046_a11_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Designers rely on apparent abundance, such as many digits or many possible codes, without translating expected volume into pairwise collision risk. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Designers rely on apparent abundance, such as many digits or many possible codes, without translating expected volume into pairwise collision risk."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Birthday Problem", "one_liner": "Pairwise collisions in a finite namespace become likely at the square root of its size, not half of it.", "page_ref": "prime:birthday_problem", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Apparent abundance -> K-versus-N intuition; any pair -> quadratic pair count.", "slug": "birthday_problem", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's central error is treating pairwise collision risk as if it scaled linearly with occupancy rather than quadratically."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Designers infer low any-pair collision risk from the apparent abundance of unused values.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The square-root collision threshold can already be crossed at a fixed draw count; growth is not mandatory.", "slug": "birthday_problem"}], "residual_id": "r:pairwise_collision_risk_budgeting:b046_a11_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b046_a11_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Growth, reuse, federation, imports, or parallel generation increases the number of draws faster than the namespace was sized for. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Growth, reuse, federation, imports, or parallel generation increases the number of draws faster than the namespace was sized for."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The square-root collision threshold can already be crossed at a fixed draw count; growth is not mandatory.", "slug": "birthday_problem"}], "normalized_requirement": "Draw volume grows faster than the namespace was sized to support.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Draw volume grows faster than the namespace was sized to support.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Any two items sharing the same value can create ambiguity, conflict, security exposure, duplicate records, or expensive reconciliation.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Any two items sharing the same value can create ambiguity, conflict, security exposure, duplicate records, or expensive reconciliation. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Any two items sharing the same value can create ambiguity, conflict, security exposure, duplicate records, or expensive reconciliation."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Any two items sharing the same value can create ambiguity, conflict, security exposure, duplicate records, or expensive reconciliation."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 46, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-046", "ledger_sha256": "79f3b304aa068abc86911603b53ae99476514ab9d6e98d2a99b1a547da6e2be4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Paradox Reframing", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:paradox_reframing", "slug": "paradox_reframing"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 5 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is frame insufficiency under contradiction. A current frame forces two partially valid claims into mutual exclusion. The contradiction may be real at one level but false at another, true under one time horizon but false under another, or generated by a hidden assumption about what must remain fixed. Without reframing, the group tends to split into camps, alternate between poles, or settle by authority, fatigue, or rhetoric.\n\nParadox Reframing asks: what must the current frame be assuming for this contradiction to hold? Which terms, scopes, levels, evidence types, or values are being collapsed? What new frame would preserve what matters on each side while changing the available action space?", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A group, model, design, policy, or inquiry is blocked because two apparently valid claims or requirements seem mutually incompatible inside the current frame. Participants either argue for one side, oscillate between sides, split into camps, or admire the paradox without changing action. The actual problem may be a hidden assumption, collapsed scope, mixed level of analysis, temporal confusion, value conflict, or communication trap."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime identifies apparently contradictory claims that expose a limitation in the current conceptual frame.", "role_mapping": "Claims -> propositions; current frame -> interpretive system; incompatibility -> paradoxical tension.", "slug": "paradox", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b046_a12_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Two claims or requirements both appear valid but cannot both fit inside the current frame. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Two claims or requirements both appear valid but cannot both fit inside the current frame."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Paradox", "one_liner": "Contradictory but revealing truth.", "page_ref": "prime:paradox", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Claims -> propositions; current frame -> interpretive system; incompatibility -> paradoxical tension.", "slug": "paradox", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime identifies apparently contradictory claims that expose a limitation in the current conceptual frame."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Two apparently valid claims or requirements cannot both fit inside the current frame.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A paradox can arise from formal axioms or self-reference without shared evidence or interpretation.", "slug": "paradox"}], "residual_id": "r:paradox_reframing:b046_a12_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b046_a12_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The same evidence supports opposing interpretations. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The same evidence supports opposing interpretations."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A paradox can arise from formal axioms or self-reference without shared evidence or interpretation.", "slug": "paradox"}], "normalized_requirement": "The same evidence supports opposing interpretations.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The same evidence supports opposing interpretations.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P088-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve plural duties applying jointly to one artifact.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Multiple duties apply to the same focal artifact.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the mandatory satisfaction requirement.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The focal artifact is required to satisfy those duties.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the apparent mutual-negation relation among the duties.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The duties appear to negate one another.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a policy to satisfy the apparently negating duties.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The focal artifact is a policy.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a design to satisfy the apparently negating duties.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The focal artifact is a design.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A policy or a design must satisfy multiple duties that appear to negate one another.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "one artifact must satisfy apparently mutually negating duties", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P088-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Many paradoxes have no policy, design, or duty roles.", "slug": "paradox"}], "residual_id": "r:paradox_reframing:b046_a12_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b046_a12_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A policy or design has to satisfy duties that appear to negate each other. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A policy or design has to satisfy duties that appear to negate each other."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Many paradoxes have no policy, design, or duty roles.", "slug": "paradox"}], "normalized_requirement": "A policy or design must satisfy duties that appear to negate one another.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A policy or design must satisfy duties that appear to negate one another.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A paradox can be encountered once and need not recur over time.", "slug": "paradox"}], "residual_id": "r:paradox_reframing:b046_a12_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b046_a12_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The contradiction recurs, suggesting a structural tension rather than a one-off misunderstanding. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The contradiction recurs, suggesting a structural tension rather than a one-off misunderstanding."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A paradox can be encountered once and need not recur over time.", "slug": "paradox"}], "normalized_requirement": "The contradiction recurs as a structural tension.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The contradiction recurs as a structural tension.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P088-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a contradiction as the object being used.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A contradiction is presented or invoked in an inquiry.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve rhetorical or strategic use, not merely the existence of a contradiction.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The contradiction is used rhetorically.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail suppression or termination of inquiry caused by the rhetorical use.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "That rhetorical use stops inquiry.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the contrast between inquiry suppression and understanding improvement.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The contradiction is used to stop inquiry rather than to improve understanding.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "A contradiction is used rhetorically to stop inquiry rather than to improve understanding.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "rhetorical contradiction stops inquiry", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P088-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A paradox can stimulate inquiry rather than stop it and need not be used rhetorically.", "slug": "paradox"}], "residual_id": "r:paradox_reframing:b046_a12_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b046_a12_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A contradiction is being used rhetorically to stop inquiry rather than improve understanding. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A contradiction is being used rhetorically to stop inquiry rather than improve understanding."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A paradox can stimulate inquiry rather than stop it and need not be used rhetorically.", "slug": "paradox"}], "normalized_requirement": "The contradiction is used rhetorically to stop inquiry.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The contradiction is used rhetorically to stop inquiry.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Opposing camps are both partly right and partly incomplete.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Opposing camps are both partly right and partly incomplete. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Opposing camps are both partly right and partly incomplete."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Opposing camps are both partly right and partly incomplete."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 46, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-046", "ledger_sha256": "79f3b304aa068abc86911603b53ae99476514ab9d6e98d2a99b1a547da6e2be4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Parallel Independent Inspection Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:parallel_independent_inspection_design", "slug": "parallel_independent_inspection_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 6, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 6, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "6 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system needs to judge or release an artifact whose defects are sparse, heterogeneous, or hard to see. One reviewer, test, audit, or inspection path gives an apparently clean result, but the probability of a miss remains high because detection depends on local expertise, interpretation, attention, and search strategy. Sequential review may also contaminate later reviewers with the first reviewer’s framing, making multiple passes look redundant while still preserving the same blind spot.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system needs to judge or release an artifact whose defects are sparse, heterogeneous, or hard to see. One reviewer, test, audit, or inspection path gives an apparently clean result, but the probability of a miss remains high because detection depends on local expertise, interpretation, attention, and search strategy. Sequential review may also contaminate later reviewers with the first reviewer’s framing, making multiple passes look redundant while still preserving the same blind spot."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires one fixed artifact held stable through an inspection window.", "role_mapping": "Artifact -> fixed object; bounded inspection -> stable window.", "slug": "parallel_independent_inspection", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b046_a13_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A bounded artifact can be inspected. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A bounded artifact can be inspected"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Parallel Independent Inspection", "one_liner": "Defect coverage of a fixed artifact rises with the number and diversity of independent inspectors working in overlapping parallel.", "page_ref": "prime:parallel_independent_inspection", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Artifact -> fixed object; bounded inspection -> stable window.", "slug": "parallel_independent_inspection", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires one fixed artifact held stable through an inspection window."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A fixed bounded artifact can be inspected during a stable window.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The union coverage model is bounded by each inspector's blind spots, making single-inspector misses constitutive.", "role_mapping": "Reviewer -> inspector; missed defect -> blind spot.", "slug": "parallel_independent_inspection", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b046_a13_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Single-inspector misses are plausible. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Single-inspector misses are plausible"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Parallel Independent Inspection", "one_liner": "Defect coverage of a fixed artifact rises with the number and diversity of independent inspectors working in overlapping parallel.", "page_ref": "prime:parallel_independent_inspection", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Reviewer -> inspector; missed defect -> blind spot.", "slug": "parallel_independent_inspection", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The union coverage model is bounded by each inspector's blind spots, making single-inspector misses constitutive."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A single inspector can plausibly miss defects because detection depends on local blind spots.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Effective independence requires overlapping parallel work rather than sequential framing contamination.", "role_mapping": "Independent review -> parallel topology; framing separation -> effective independence.", "slug": "parallel_independent_inspection", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b046_a13_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Inspectors can remain meaningfully independent. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Inspectors can remain meaningfully independent"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Parallel Independent Inspection", "one_liner": "Defect coverage of a fixed artifact rises with the number and diversity of independent inspectors working in overlapping parallel.", "page_ref": "prime:parallel_independent_inspection", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Independent review -> parallel topology; framing separation -> effective independence.", "slug": "parallel_independent_inspection", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Effective independence requires overlapping parallel work rather than sequential framing contamination."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Inspectors can work without inheriting one another's framing.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Coverage scales with diversity and orthogonality of inspector blind spots.", "role_mapping": "Perspectives -> expertise profiles; variation -> blind-spot orthogonality.", "slug": "parallel_independent_inspection", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b046_a13_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Inspector perspectives can vary. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Inspector perspectives can vary"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Parallel Independent Inspection", "one_liner": "Defect coverage of a fixed artifact rises with the number and diversity of independent inspectors working in overlapping parallel.", "page_ref": "prime:parallel_independent_inspection", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Perspectives -> expertise profiles; variation -> blind-spot orthogonality.", "slug": "parallel_independent_inspection", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Coverage scales with diversity and orthogonality of inspector blind spots."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Inspector expertise and blind-spot profiles can differ.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires a coordination layer such as a defect tracker to reconcile discoveries.", "role_mapping": "Findings -> detections; reconciliation -> coordination layer.", "slug": "parallel_independent_inspection", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b046_a13_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Findings can be reconciled. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Findings can be reconciled"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Parallel Independent Inspection", "one_liner": "Defect coverage of a fixed artifact rises with the number and diversity of independent inspectors working in overlapping parallel.", "page_ref": "prime:parallel_independent_inspection", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Findings -> detections; reconciliation -> coordination layer.", "slug": "parallel_independent_inspection", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires a coordination layer such as a defect tracker to reconcile discoveries."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Findings can be reconciled in a shared coordination layer.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Parallel inspectors intentionally overlap, and defect coverage is the union of their detection probabilities.", "role_mapping": "Overlap -> parallel inspection; usefulness -> union coverage.", "slug": "parallel_independent_inspection", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b046_a13_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Overlap is useful. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Overlap is useful"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Parallel Independent Inspection", "one_liner": "Defect coverage of a fixed artifact rises with the number and diversity of independent inspectors working in overlapping parallel.", "page_ref": "prime:parallel_independent_inspection", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Overlap -> parallel inspection; usefulness -> union coverage.", "slug": "parallel_independent_inspection", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Parallel inspectors intentionally overlap, and defect coverage is the union of their detection probabilities."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Overlapping inspection is useful because detection coverage is a union rather than a partition.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Defects are costly enough to search for.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Defects are costly enough to search for. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Defects are costly enough to search for"]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "Defects are costly enough to search for"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 46, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-046", "ledger_sha256": "79f3b304aa068abc86911603b53ae99476514ab9d6e98d2a99b1a547da6e2be4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Parameter Rescaling", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:parameter_rescaling", "slug": "parameter_rescaling"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is scale-dependent meaning. A value carries assumptions about unit size, exposure, density, resolution, time horizon, interaction pattern, fixed cost, and measurement basis. When those assumptions change, the same number can create a different effect. It may trigger too early or too late, rank units unfairly, make a model unstable, hide fixed costs, or make a pilot look transferable when it is not.\n\nThe dangerous part is that the bad value often still looks precise. The failure is not that the parameter is missing; the failure is that its original meaning was silently carried into a context where it no longer applies.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A parameter, threshold, metric, baseline, or rule is copied from one scale to another even though its meaning depends on unit size, population, time horizon, aggregation level, model resolution, interaction density, or operating context. The raw value may look precise while producing the wrong behavior at the target scale."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P088-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve distinct source and target scales.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A source scale and a target scale are distinct contexts for the transferred artifact.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the direction of transfer from source to target scale.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The selected artifact is moved from the source scale to the target scale.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a model to be transferred across scales.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The transferred artifact is a model.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a rule to be transferred across scales.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The transferred artifact is a rule.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a metric to be transferred across scales.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The transferred artifact is a metric.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a threshold to be transferred across scales.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The transferred artifact is a threshold.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires an allocation formula to be transferred across scales.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The transferred artifact is an allocation formula.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "One listed kind of model or governance artifact is moved from a source scale to a different target scale.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "artifact is transferred across scales", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P088-C08-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A calibrated rule can drift within one scale and need not be transferred.", "slug": "calibrated_rule_vs_moving_world"}], "residual_id": "r:parameter_rescaling:b046_a14_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b046_a14_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A model, rule, metric, threshold, or allocation formula is being moved from a source scale to a target scale. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A model, rule, metric, threshold, or allocation formula is being moved from a source scale to a target scale."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A calibrated rule can drift within one scale and need not be transferred.", "slug": "calibrated_rule_vs_moving_world"}], "normalized_requirement": "A model parameter, threshold, metric, or rule is transferred from one scale to another.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A model parameter, threshold, metric, or rule is transferred from one scale to another.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A resolution match can occur within one scale and need not compare source and target contexts.", "slug": "resolution_matching"}], "residual_id": "r:parameter_rescaling:b046_a14_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b046_a14_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The target unit differs in size, time window, density, exposure, resolution, complexity, or interaction pattern. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The target unit differs in size, time window, density, exposure, resolution, complexity, or interaction pattern."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A resolution match can occur within one scale and need not compare source and target contexts.", "slug": "resolution_matching"}], "normalized_requirement": "Source and target units differ in size, time, density, exposure, resolution, complexity, or interaction pattern.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Source and target units differ in size, time, density, exposure, resolution, complexity, or interaction pattern.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A ratio can be dimensionally valid and comparable across units.", "slug": "ratio"}], "residual_id": "r:parameter_rescaling:b046_a14_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b046_a14_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Raw totals, rates, ratios, or thresholds are being compared across units that are not directly comparable. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Raw totals, rates, ratios, or thresholds are being compared across units that are not directly comparable."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A ratio can be dimensionally valid and comparable across units.", "slug": "ratio"}], "normalized_requirement": "Raw totals, rates, ratios, or thresholds are compared across non-comparable units.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Raw totals, rates, ratios, or thresholds are compared across non-comparable units.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A pilot, prototype, local rule, or small-scale model is being generalized to a larger or differently structured context.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A parameter, threshold, metric, baseline, or rule is copied from one scale to another even though its meaning depends on unit size, population, time horizon, aggregation level, model resolution, interaction density, or operating context. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: A pilot, prototype, local rule, or small-scale model is being generalized to a larger or differently structured context. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A pilot, prototype, local rule, or small-scale model is being generalized to a larger or differently structured context.", "A parameter, threshold, metric, baseline, or rule is copied from one scale to another even though its meaning depends on unit size, population, time horizon, aggregation level, model resolution, interaction density, or operating context."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "A pilot, prototype, local rule, or small-scale model is being generalized to a larger or differently structured context."}, {"display_text": "The model or rule must preserve a behavior, decision boundary, load level, risk level, or effect rather than preserve a literal numeric value.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The intervention must change the numerical value enough to fit the target scale while preserving the behavior, comparison, constraint, or decision effect that made the source value useful. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: The model or rule must preserve a behavior, decision boundary, load level, risk level, or effect rather than preserve a literal numeric value. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The model or rule must preserve a behavior, decision boundary, load level, risk level, or effect rather than preserve a literal numeric value.", "The intervention must change the numerical value enough to fit the target scale while preserving the behavior, comparison, constraint, or decision effect that made the source value useful."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The model or rule must preserve a behavior, decision boundary, load level, risk level, or effect rather than preserve a literal numeric value."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 46, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-046", "ledger_sha256": "79f3b304aa068abc86911603b53ae99476514ab9d6e98d2a99b1a547da6e2be4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Pareto Focus", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:pareto_focus", "slug": "pareto_focus"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is diffuse effort in the face of concentrated contribution. The system treats many contributors as if they matter equally even though a small subset drives most of the burden or value. This creates busy work, slow improvement, weak prioritization, and hidden opportunity cost.\n\nA second problem sits inside the first: concentration can create blindness. If the long tail contains rare catastrophic risks, underserved groups, emerging patterns, mission-critical exceptions, or legally protected cases, focusing only on the critical few can improve the aggregate metric while making the system worse.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Resources, attention, analysis, support, or intervention effort are spread evenly, reactively, or politically despite evidence that a small subset of contributors drives a disproportionate share of the relevant outcome."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires a ranked non-uniform contribution distribution in which a small fraction produces a large fraction of the total.", "role_mapping": "Causes or cases -> ranked items; outcome -> contribution measure; skew -> Pareto concentration.", "slug": "pareto_effect_80_20_rule", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b046_a15_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The outcome has a visibly skewed distribution: a few causes, cases, users, sites, tasks, assets, defects, accounts, or decisions produce most cost, value, harm, risk, delay, demand, or opportunity. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The outcome has a visibly skewed distribution: a few causes, cases, users, sites, tasks, assets, defects, accounts, or decisions produce most cost, value, harm, risk, delay, demand, or opportunity."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Pareto Effect (80/20 Rule)", "one_liner": "80/20 distribution.", "page_ref": "prime:pareto_effect_80_20_rule", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Causes or cases -> ranked items; outcome -> contribution measure; skew -> Pareto concentration.", "slug": "pareto_effect_80_20_rule", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires a ranked non-uniform contribution distribution in which a small fraction produces a large fraction of the total."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A small ranked subset contributes a disproportionate share of the measured outcome.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A skewed contribution distribution can already receive correctly concentrated effort.", "slug": "pareto_effect_80_20_rule"}], "residual_id": "r:pareto_focus:b046_a15_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b046_a15_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Improvement efforts are diluted across low-impact categories while high-impact drivers remain under-addressed. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Improvement efforts are diluted across low-impact categories while high-impact drivers remain under-addressed."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A skewed contribution distribution can already receive correctly concentrated effort.", "slug": "pareto_effect_80_20_rule"}], "normalized_requirement": "Improvement effort is diluted across low-impact categories while dominant drivers remain under-addressed.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Improvement effort is diluted across low-impact categories while dominant drivers remain under-addressed.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact analytical object ranks items by monotonic contribution and aggregates cumulatively across ranks.", "role_mapping": "Outcome -> aggregate measure; contributors -> ranked items; measurement -> cumulative curve.", "slug": "pareto_effect_80_20_rule", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b046_a15_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A recurring outcome can be categorized and measured well enough to rank contributors. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A recurring outcome can be categorized and measured well enough to rank contributors."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Pareto Effect (80/20 Rule)", "one_liner": "80/20 distribution.", "page_ref": "prime:pareto_effect_80_20_rule", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Outcome -> aggregate measure; contributors -> ranked items; measurement -> cumulative curve.", "slug": "pareto_effect_80_20_rule", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact analytical object ranks items by monotonic contribution and aggregates cumulatively across ranks."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The recurring outcome can be measured and contributors ranked by cumulative contribution.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Limited resources make equal treatment of every contributor impractical or ineffective.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Resources, attention, analysis, support, or intervention effort are spread evenly, reactively, or politically despite evidence that a small subset of contributors drives a disproportionate share of the relevant outcome. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Limited resources make equal treatment of every contributor impractical or ineffective. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Limited resources make equal treatment of every contributor impractical or ineffective.", "Resources, attention, analysis, support, or intervention effort are spread evenly, reactively, or politically despite evidence that a small subset of contributors drives a disproportionate share of the relevant outcome."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "Limited resources make equal treatment of every contributor impractical or ineffective."}, {"display_text": "Teams are overwhelmed by many possible problems and need a principled way to choose where concentrated effort begins.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The structural problem is diffuse effort in the face of concentrated contribution. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: Teams are overwhelmed by many possible problems and need a principled way to choose where concentrated effort begins. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Teams are overwhelmed by many possible problems and need a principled way to choose where concentrated effort begins.", "The structural problem is diffuse effort in the face of concentrated contribution."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Teams are overwhelmed by many possible problems and need a principled way to choose where concentrated effort begins."}, {"display_text": "The long tail can be monitored or protected so concentration does not silently abandon rare but important cases.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "If the long tail contains rare catastrophic risks, underserved groups, emerging patterns, mission-critical exceptions, or legally protected cases, focusing only on the critical few can improve the aggregate metric while making the system worse. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: The long tail can be monitored or protected so concentration does not silently abandon rare but important cases. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The long tail can be monitored or protected so concentration does not silently abandon rare but important cases.", "If the long tail contains rare catastrophic risks, underserved groups, emerging patterns, mission-critical exceptions, or legally protected cases, focusing only on the critical few can improve the aggregate metric while making the system worse."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The long tail can be monitored or protected so concentration does not silently abandon rare but important cases."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 46, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-046", "ledger_sha256": "79f3b304aa068abc86911603b53ae99476514ab9d6e98d2a99b1a547da6e2be4"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Pareto Frontier Navigation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:pareto_frontier_navigation", "slug": "pareto_frontier_navigation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 3 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a multi-objective decision space containing both dominated and non-dominated options. Without a frontier discipline, the decision can be distorted in several ways. Dominated options may remain politically protected. Weighted scores may hide value choices before anyone sees the real tradeoffs. A visually persuasive chart may imply rigor while omitting important dimensions. A legacy option may survive because nobody compares it against a feasible alternative across all objectives.\n\nThe root tension is that Pareto efficiency can identify inferior options, but it cannot decide which efficient option is best. Non-dominance is a screening rule, not a moral or strategic conclusion. The archetype works only when that distinction is preserved.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A decision space contains multiple feasible options and multiple valued objectives, but some options are strictly worse than others across the relevant dimensions. Without a frontier discipline, the system may select dominated compromises or argue over options that should have been eliminated before deliberation."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires two or more partly competing objectives over one feasible decision space.", "role_mapping": "Valued dimensions -> objectives; option space -> feasible set.", "slug": "multiobjective_optimization", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b047_a01_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Multiple objectives matter at once. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Multiple objectives matter at once."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Multiobjective Optimization", "one_liner": "Balance competing objectives.", "page_ref": "prime:multiobjective_optimization", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Valued dimensions -> objectives; option space -> feasible set.", "slug": "multiobjective_optimization", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires two or more partly competing objectives over one feasible decision space."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A decision problem has two or more objectives that matter simultaneously.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Multiple objectives can be lexicographically ordered so one legitimately dominates final selection.", "slug": "multiobjective_optimization"}], "residual_id": "r:pareto_frontier_navigation:b047_a01_c2", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b047_a01_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when several objectives matter at once and no single objective can legitimately decide the case. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: No single objective legitimately dominates the choice.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["No single objective legitimately dominates the choice.", "Use this archetype when several objectives matter at once and no single objective can legitimately decide the case."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Multiple objectives can be lexicographically ordered so one legitimately dominates final selection.", "slug": "multiobjective_optimization"}], "normalized_requirement": "No single objective legitimately dominates the choice.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "No single objective legitimately dominates the choice.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A Pareto-efficient set can contain no dominated alternatives.", "slug": "pareto_efficiency"}], "residual_id": "r:pareto_frontier_navigation:b047_a01_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b047_a01_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The option set includes likely dominated alternatives. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The option set includes likely dominated alternatives."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A Pareto-efficient set can contain no dominated alternatives.", "slug": "pareto_efficiency"}], "normalized_requirement": "The feasible option set contains alternatives dominated on all relevant objectives.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The feasible option set contains alternatives dominated on all relevant objectives.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Stakeholders are debating inefficient compromises.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Stakeholders are debating inefficient compromises. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders are debating inefficient compromises."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Stakeholders are debating inefficient compromises."}, {"display_text": "The tradeoff space is too large for intuitive comparison.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The tradeoff space is too large for intuitive comparison. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The tradeoff space is too large for intuitive comparison."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The tradeoff space is too large for intuitive comparison."}, {"display_text": "A final value choice must be separated from technical screening.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Weighted scores may hide value choices before anyone sees the real tradeoffs. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: A final value choice must be separated from technical screening. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A final value choice must be separated from technical screening.", "Weighted scores may hide value choices before anyone sees the real tradeoffs."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "A final value choice must be separated from technical screening."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 47, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-047", "ledger_sha256": "dfc910a776885a409b8e5e54a132c12dd9bae04f51da4883574a04ca9a95f696"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Parsimony Filter", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:parsimony_filter", "slug": "parsimony_filter"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 4 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is unjustified complexity. A candidate explanation, design, model, or plan has accumulated more assumptions, entities, features, mechanisms, exceptions, or parameters than it needs. That complexity may feel rigorous, but it can hide fragility: the plan depends on too many premises, the model overfits local detail, the design becomes hard to maintain, or the explanation becomes speculative.\n\nThe root tension is adequacy versus burden. Too little complexity produces underfitting and missed exceptions. Too much complexity produces opacity, maintenance cost, validation burden, and avoidable failure surface. Parsimony Filter manages that tension by requiring every retained complexity to have a reason.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A model, explanation, design, plan, or process has more assumptions, entities, features, mechanisms, parameters, or exceptions than the evidence or task requires."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact rule compares equally adequate explanations and prefers the one with fewer unsupported commitments.", "role_mapping": "Explanations or designs -> candidate models; same evidence -> equal adequacy.", "slug": "parsimony_occam_s_razor", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b047_a02_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when several explanations, models, designs, or plans could plausibly work, but some carry more assumptions or moving parts than the evidence or task requires. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Several explanations or designs fit the same evidence.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Several explanations or designs fit the same evidence.", "Use this archetype when several explanations, models, designs, or plans could plausibly work, but some carry more assumptions or moving parts than the evidence or task requires."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Parsimony (Occam's Razor)", "one_liner": "Prefer simplicity.", "page_ref": "prime:parsimony_occam_s_razor", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Explanations or designs -> candidate models; same evidence -> equal adequacy.", "slug": "parsimony_occam_s_razor", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact rule compares equally adequate explanations and prefers the one with fewer unsupported commitments."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Several explanations or designs fit the same evidence.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A parsimonious comparison need not involve temporal premature addition or an unproven need.", "slug": "parsimony_occam_s_razor"}], "residual_id": "r:parsimony_filter:b047_a02_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b047_a02_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A proposal adds features, steps, rules, or exceptions before the core need is proven. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A proposal adds features, steps, rules, or exceptions before the core need is proven."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A parsimonious comparison need not involve temporal premature addition or an unproven need.", "slug": "parsimony_occam_s_razor"}], "normalized_requirement": "A proposal adds features, rules, steps, or exceptions before the core need is established.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A proposal adds features, rules, steps, or exceptions before the core need is established.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complex model can be warranted by evidence, and parsimony does not entail unclear value.", "slug": "parsimony_occam_s_razor"}], "residual_id": "r:parsimony_filter:b047_a02_c3", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b047_a02_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A model uses many variables, parameters, or conditions without clear decision value. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A model uses many variables, parameters, or conditions without clear decision value."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complex model can be warranted by evidence, and parsimony does not entail unclear value.", "slug": "parsimony_occam_s_razor"}], "normalized_requirement": "A model carries many parameters without clear decision value.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A model carries many parameters without clear decision value.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Parsimony can compare entities or mechanisms with no favorable-context assumptions.", "slug": "parsimony_occam_s_razor"}], "residual_id": "r:parsimony_filter:b047_a02_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b047_a02_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A plan depends on many favorable assumptions about context, behavior, timing, or resources. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A plan depends on many favorable assumptions about context, behavior, timing, or resources."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Parsimony can compare entities or mechanisms with no favorable-context assumptions.", "slug": "parsimony_occam_s_razor"}], "normalized_requirement": "A plan depends on many favorable contextual assumptions.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A plan depends on many favorable contextual assumptions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "People are mistaking detailedness for rigor.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: People are mistaking detailedness for rigor. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["People are mistaking detailedness for rigor."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "People are mistaking detailedness for rigor."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 47, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-047", "ledger_sha256": "dfc910a776885a409b8e5e54a132c12dd9bae04f51da4883574a04ca9a95f696"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Part-Level Explanatory Reduction", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:part_level_explanatory_reduction", "slug": "part_level_explanatory_reduction"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A whole-level phenomenon, outcome, system behavior, or category is being explained in a way that is too global, mystical, aggregate, or black-boxed to test, compare, repair, or intervene on. The analysis lacks a defensible account of which lower-level parts matter, how they interact, and whether their composition is sufficient to generate the whole-level behavior. Conversely, the analysis may already be reductive but hides its sufficiency assumptions, causing whole-level emergent, contextual, or downward-causal effects to be ignored.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A whole-level phenomenon, outcome, system behavior, or category is being explained in a way that is too global, mystical, aggregate, or black-boxed to test, compare, repair, or intervene on. The analysis lacks a defensible account of which lower-level parts matter, how they interact, and whether their composition is sufficient to generate the whole-level behavior. Conversely, the analysis may already be reductive but hides its sufficiency assumptions, causing whole-level emergent, contextual, or downward-causal effects to be ignored."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A reductionist explanation can already provide a complete micro-level account.", "slug": "reductionism"}], "residual_id": "r:part_level_explanatory_reduction:b047_a03_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b047_a03_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A macro-level pattern, aggregate metric, system property, symptom, or behavior is asserted without a part-level causal account. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A macro-level pattern, aggregate metric, system property, symptom, or behavior is asserted without a part-level causal account."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A reductionist explanation can already provide a complete micro-level account.", "slug": "reductionism"}], "normalized_requirement": "A macro property is asserted without a part-level causal account.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A macro property is asserted without a part-level causal account.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid reductive account can already establish sufficiency.", "slug": "reductionism"}], "residual_id": "r:part_level_explanatory_reduction:b047_a03_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b047_a03_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A model needs to show that lower-level assumptions actually reconstruct the higher-level phenomenon it claims to explain. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A model needs to show that lower-level assumptions actually reconstruct the higher-level phenomenon it claims to explain."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid reductive account can already establish sufficiency.", "slug": "reductionism"}], "normalized_requirement": "Lower-level assumptions have not yet been shown sufficient to reconstruct the higher-level phenomenon.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Lower-level assumptions have not yet been shown sufficient to reconstruct the higher-level phenomenon.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Decomposition can be complete for a task and need not leave an emergent residual.", "slug": "decomposition"}], "residual_id": "r:part_level_explanatory_reduction:b047_a03_c7", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b047_a03_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A whole-level explanation seems overextended and needs a residual check to decide where reduction stops being valid. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A whole-level explanation seems overextended and needs a residual check to decide where reduction stops being valid."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Decomposition can be complete for a task and need not leave an emergent residual.", "slug": "decomposition"}], "normalized_requirement": "A whole-level account needs a residual check for where reduction stops being valid.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A whole-level account needs a residual check for where reduction stops being valid.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A claim about a whole must be made testable, mechanistic, or actionable by identifying constituent units and interaction rules.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Part-level explanation creates precision, testability, and intervention leverage, but wholes often contain scale-dependent, relational, contextual, or emergent properties that cannot be safely collapsed into their constituents. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: A claim about a whole must be made testable, mechanistic, or actionable by identifying constituent units and interaction rules. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A claim about a whole must be made testable, mechanistic, or actionable by identifying constituent units and interaction rules.", "Part-level explanation creates precision, testability, and intervention leverage, but wholes often contain scale-dependent, relational, contextual, or emergent properties that cannot be safely collapsed into their constituents."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "A claim about a whole must be made testable, mechanistic, or actionable by identifying constituent units and interaction rules."}, {"display_text": "Intervention requires knowing which part, property, relation, or interaction to change rather than treating the whole as indivisible.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Part-level explanation creates precision, testability, and intervention leverage, but wholes often contain scale-dependent, relational, contextual, or emergent properties that cannot be safely collapsed into their constituents. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: Intervention requires knowing which part, property, relation, or interaction to change rather than treating the whole as indivisible. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Intervention requires knowing which part, property, relation, or interaction to change rather than treating the whole as indivisible.", "Part-level explanation creates precision, testability, and intervention leverage, but wholes often contain scale-dependent, relational, contextual, or emergent properties that cannot be safely collapsed into their constituents."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Intervention requires knowing which part, property, relation, or interaction to change rather than treating the whole as indivisible."}, {"display_text": "Teams disagree because one side treats the whole as emergent or holistic while another assumes parts fully explain it.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The pattern must make parts explanatory without letting the parts erase the whole. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Teams disagree because one side treats the whole as emergent or holistic while another assumes parts fully explain it. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Teams disagree because one side treats the whole as emergent or holistic while another assumes parts fully explain it.", "The pattern must make parts explanatory without letting the parts erase the whole."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Teams disagree because one side treats the whole as emergent or holistic while another assumes parts fully explain it."}, {"display_text": "A domain relies on microfoundations, mechanisms, material constituents, agents, cells, components, or variables to explain a system-level outcome.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A whole-level phenomenon, outcome, system behavior, or category is being explained in a way that is too global, mystical, aggregate, or black-boxed to test, compare, repair, or intervene on. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: A domain relies on microfoundations, mechanisms, material constituents, agents, cells, components, or variables to explain a system-level outcome. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A domain relies on microfoundations, mechanisms, material constituents, agents, cells, components, or variables to explain a system-level outcome.", "A whole-level phenomenon, outcome, system behavior, or category is being explained in a way that is too global, mystical, aggregate, or black-boxed to test, compare, repair, or intervene on."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "A domain relies on microfoundations, mechanisms, material constituents, agents, cells, components, or variables to explain a system-level outcome."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 47, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-047", "ledger_sha256": "dfc910a776885a409b8e5e54a132c12dd9bae04f51da4883574a04ca9a95f696"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Part-Whole Unity Criterion Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:part_whole_unity_criterion_design", "slug": "part_whole_unity_criterion_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system must count, govern, analyze, merge, preserve, repair, own, or act on a collection of parts, but it has not stated the rule that determines whether those parts are one whole or merely many related items.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system must count, govern, analyze, merge, preserve, repair, own, or act on a collection of parts, but it has not stated the rule that determines whether those parts are one whole or merely many related items."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record evaluates whether multiple parts satisfy a relation sufficient to constitute one whole.", "role_mapping": "Collection -> parts; one unit -> candidate whole; counting -> unity judgment.", "slug": "unity_test", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b047_a04_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A collection of parts is being counted as one unit in a dataset, inventory, legal record, system model, plan, or narrative. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A collection of parts is being counted as one unit in a dataset, inventory, legal record, system model, plan, or narrative."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Unity Test", "one_liner": "The rule that decides, in a given system, when a collection of parts counts as one whole rather than many.", "page_ref": "prime:unity_test", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Collection -> parts; one unit -> candidate whole; counting -> unity judgment.", "slug": "unity_test", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record evaluates whether multiple parts satisfy a relation sufficient to constitute one whole."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Several parts are counted or governed as one unit.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A unity criterion can be agreed and decisive without stakeholders.", "slug": "unity_test"}], "residual_id": "r:part_whole_unity_criterion_design:b047_a04_c2", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b047_a04_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Different stakeholders disagree about whether parts compose one system, organization, incident, asset, object, story, or process. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Different stakeholders disagree about whether parts compose one system, organization, incident, asset, object, story, or process."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A unity criterion can be agreed and decisive without stakeholders.", "slug": "unity_test"}], "normalized_requirement": "Stakeholders disagree whether the parts compose one whole.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Stakeholders disagree whether the parts compose one whole.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record compares candidate unity relations such as continuity, function, boundary, or causal integration.", "role_mapping": "Relations -> unity criteria; parts -> candidate whole.", "slug": "unity_test", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b047_a04_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Parts are connected by multiple possible relations, such as proximity, ownership, function, causal coupling, boundary, lineage, membership, or continuity. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Parts are connected by multiple possible relations, such as proximity, ownership, function, causal coupling, boundary, lineage, membership, or continuity."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Unity Test", "one_liner": "The rule that decides, in a given system, when a collection of parts counts as one whole rather than many.", "page_ref": "prime:unity_test", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Relations -> unity criteria; parts -> candidate whole.", "slug": "unity_test", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record compares candidate unity relations such as continuity, function, boundary, or causal integration."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Several candidate relations could compose the parts into a whole.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Unity depends on the declared criterion, so changing the criterion can change the whole count.", "role_mapping": "Alternative kinds of unity -> criteria; one or many -> test outcome.", "slug": "unity_test", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b047_a04_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The same collection could be one whole under one kind of unity and many under another. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The same collection could be one whole under one kind of unity and many under another."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Unity Test", "one_liner": "The rule that decides, in a given system, when a collection of parts counts as one whole rather than many.", "page_ref": "prime:unity_test", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Alternative kinds of unity -> criteria; one or many -> test outcome.", "slug": "unity_test", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Unity depends on the declared criterion, so changing the criterion can change the whole count."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The same collection can be one whole under one unity criterion and many under another.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A unity test can concern one nonnested candidate whole with a clear boundary.", "slug": "unity_test"}], "residual_id": "r:part_whole_unity_criterion_design:b047_a04_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b047_a04_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Nested or overlapping wholes make counts, boundaries, or accountability ambiguous. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Nested or overlapping wholes make counts, boundaries, or accountability ambiguous."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A unity test can concern one nonnested candidate whole with a clear boundary.", "slug": "unity_test"}], "normalized_requirement": "Nested or overlapping wholes make boundaries or accountability ambiguous.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Nested or overlapping wholes make boundaries or accountability ambiguous.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A downstream action depends on one-versus-many status: merge, split, assign responsibility, measure, insure, repair, govern, or archive.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system must count, govern, analyze, merge, preserve, repair, own, or act on a collection of parts, but it has not stated the rule that determines whether those parts are one whole or merely many related items. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: A downstream action depends on one-versus-many status: merge, split, assign responsibility, measure, insure, repair, govern, or archive. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A downstream action depends on one-versus-many status: merge, split, assign responsibility, measure, insure, repair, govern, or archive.", "A system must count, govern, analyze, merge, preserve, repair, own, or act on a collection of parts, but it has not stated the rule that determines whether those parts are one whole or merely many related items."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "A downstream action depends on one-versus-many status: merge, split, assign responsibility, measure, insure, repair, govern, or archive."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 47, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-047", "ledger_sha256": "dfc910a776885a409b8e5e54a132c12dd9bae04f51da4883574a04ca9a95f696"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Participation Equity and Inclusion Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:participation_equity_and_inclusion_design", "slug": "participation_equity_and_inclusion_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 3 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A collective activity is supposed to create shared energy, belonging, commitment, or emotional convergence, but the activity’s default format excludes, silences, coerces, or peripheralizes some of the people whose participation is needed.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A collective activity is supposed to create shared energy, belonging, commitment, or emotional convergence, but the activity’s default format excludes, silences, coerces, or peripheralizes some of the people whose participation is needed."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P088-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O9"], ["O1", "O2", "O10"], ["O1", "O2", "O11"], ["O1", "O2", "O12"], ["O1", "O2", "O13"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve plural potential participants in a common activity.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Multiple people have an opportunity or expectation to participate in a shared activity.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail that the selected difference causes unequal participation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The selected participant or access difference makes participation uneven among those people.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires status to make participation uneven.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The selected difference is status.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires expertise to make participation uneven.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The selected difference is expertise.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires role hierarchy to make participation uneven.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The selected difference is role hierarchy.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires language to make participation uneven.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The selected difference is language.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires disability to make participation uneven.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The selected difference is disability.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires culture to make participation uneven.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The selected difference is culture.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires anxiety to make participation uneven.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "The selected difference is anxiety.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires remote access to make participation uneven.", "obligation_id": "O10", "statement": "The selected difference is remote access.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires schedule to make participation uneven.", "obligation_id": "O11", "statement": "The selected difference is schedule.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires sensory load to make participation uneven.", "obligation_id": "O12", "statement": "The selected difference is sensory load.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires insider knowledge to make participation uneven.", "obligation_id": "O13", "statement": "The selected difference is insider knowledge.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "One listed status, capability, access, or context difference makes participation uneven.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "participant difference causes uneven participation", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P088-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Shared expectations can exist with equal participation and need not create an access barrier.", "slug": "social_norms"}], "residual_id": "r:participation_equity_and_inclusion_design:b047_a05_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b047_a05_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Status, expertise, role hierarchy, language, disability, culture, anxiety, remote access, schedule, sensory load, or insider knowledge makes participation uneven. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Status, expertise, role hierarchy, language, disability, culture, anxiety, remote access, schedule, sensory load, or insider knowledge makes participation uneven."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Trying to retain a deliberating group with heterogeneous expertise while making contributions even contradicts the candidate's participation-by-comprehension mechanism.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Parkinson's Law of Triviality (Bikeshedding)", "one_liner": "Explain why a deliberating group allocates time to agenda items in inverse proportion to their consequence — because members contribute only where they can comprehend, so trivial-but-familiar items draw everyone while consequential-but-technical ones defer to a few.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:parkinsons_law_of_triviality", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "parkinsons_law_of_triviality"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "parkinsons_law_of_triviality", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P088-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent reconciliation confirms the raw exact-record mapping under universal necessity. The expertise branch O1-O2-O4 is directly and universally entailed; fatal gaps on unused branches do not affect DNF satisfaction."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_SYNTHESIS", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "An instance retaining founding participatory intent plus oligarchic professional leadership cannot make member decision participation even without ceasing to be the named crystallization.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Iron law of oligarchy", "one_liner": "Michels's thesis that large democratic organizations inevitably develop entrenched professional leadership — not through betrayal but through three structural forces (technical necessity, mass passivity, leader self-interest) — so the 'iron' resolves into whether counter-mechanisms engage.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:iron_law_of_oligarchy", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "iron_law_of_oligarchy"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "iron_law_of_oligarchy", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P088-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent reconciliation confirms the raw exact-record mapping under universal necessity. At least the expertise and role-hierarchy branches are directly entailed, with the same direction from participant difference to unequal participation."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "If novices and full members participated at equal centrality regardless of recognized competence, the legitimate-peripheral-to-central trajectory would be absent.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Situated Learning", "one_liner": "Treat competence as something formed and recognised inside a community of practice rather than transferred through a curriculum, so a novice learns by doing real low-stakes work at the periphery and deepening toward the centre as the community recognises their growing skill.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:situated_learning", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "situated_learning"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "situated_learning", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P088-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent reconciliation confirms the raw exact-record mapping under universal necessity. The expertise branch is a direct subtype-preserving instance of uneven participation, without treating the learning operation as a substitute for the relation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Status, expertise, language, disability, culture, access, schedule, sensory load, or insider knowledge makes participation uneven.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Solidarity can be voluntarily formed and inclusive.", "slug": "solidarity"}], "residual_id": "r:participation_equity_and_inclusion_design:b047_a05_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b047_a05_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The group wants emotional convergence, solidarity, or commitment, but participation pressure may become coercive or exclusionary. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The group wants emotional convergence, solidarity, or commitment, but participation pressure may become coercive or exclusionary."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Solidarity can be voluntarily formed and inclusive.", "slug": "solidarity"}], "normalized_requirement": "Pressure for solidarity risks coercing or excluding participants.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Pressure for solidarity risks coercing or excluding participants.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P088-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve access to shared norms as the relevant entry relation.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The selected non-insider's entry is entry into a group's shared norms.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve entry as needed, not merely possible or optional.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The selected non-insider needs that entry into the shared norms.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must prohibit compelled insider mimicry as the price of entry.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Entry must not be conditioned on forced mimicry of insiders.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve that immediate mimicry is not required, rather than banning all eventual norm learning.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The prohibited forced mimicry is immediate.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a newcomer to need entry into the shared norms.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The non-insider is a newcomer.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a peripheral member to need entry into the shared norms.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The non-insider is a peripheral member.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A newcomer or peripheral member needs entry into shared norms without being forced to mimic insiders immediately.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "non-insiders need norm access without immediate insider mimicry", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P088-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A stable norm does not require newcomers or a designed entry path.", "slug": "social_norms"}], "residual_id": "r:participation_equity_and_inclusion_design:b047_a05_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b047_a05_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Newcomers or peripheral members need entry into shared norms without being forced to mimic insiders immediately. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Newcomers or peripheral members need entry into shared norms without being forced to mimic insiders immediately."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A stable norm does not require newcomers or a designed entry path.", "slug": "social_norms"}], "normalized_requirement": "Peripheral members need entry into shared norms without immediate insider mimicry.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Peripheral members need entry into shared norms without immediate insider mimicry.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A gathering, ritual, meeting, performance, celebration, deliberation, or movement activity depends on broad participation rather than passive attendance.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A collective activity is supposed to create shared energy, belonging, commitment, or emotional convergence, but the activity’s default format excludes, silences, coerces, or peripheralizes some of the people whose participation is needed. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: A gathering, ritual, meeting, performance, celebration, deliberation, or movement activity depends on broad participation rather than passive attendance. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A gathering, ritual, meeting, performance, celebration, deliberation, or movement activity depends on broad participation rather than passive attendance.", "A collective activity is supposed to create shared energy, belonging, commitment, or emotional convergence, but the activity’s default format excludes, silences, coerces, or peripheralizes some of the people whose participation is needed."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "A gathering, ritual, meeting, performance, celebration, deliberation, or movement activity depends on broad participation rather than passive attendance."}, {"display_text": "The activity has enough symbolic or affective weight that exclusion damages legitimacy, belonging, or trust.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A collective activity is supposed to create shared energy, belonging, commitment, or emotional convergence, but the activity’s default format excludes, silences, coerces, or peripheralizes some of the people whose participation is needed. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The activity has enough symbolic or affective weight that exclusion damages legitimacy, belonging, or trust. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The activity has enough symbolic or affective weight that exclusion damages legitimacy, belonging, or trust.", "A collective activity is supposed to create shared energy, belonging, commitment, or emotional convergence, but the activity’s default format excludes, silences, coerces, or peripheralizes some of the people whose participation is needed."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The activity has enough symbolic or affective weight that exclusion damages legitimacy, belonging, or trust."}, {"display_text": "A facilitator, host, organizer, teacher, conductor, steward, or design team can change formats and norms before or during the activity.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A collective activity is supposed to create shared energy, belonging, commitment, or emotional convergence, but the activity’s default format excludes, silences, coerces, or peripheralizes some of the people whose participation is needed. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: A facilitator, host, organizer, teacher, conductor, steward, or design team can change formats and norms before or during the activity. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A facilitator, host, organizer, teacher, conductor, steward, or design team can change formats and norms before or during the activity.", "A collective activity is supposed to create shared energy, belonging, commitment, or emotional convergence, but the activity’s default format excludes, silences, coerces, or peripheralizes some of the people whose participation is needed."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "A facilitator, host, organizer, teacher, conductor, steward, or design team can change formats and norms before or during the activity."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 47, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-047", "ledger_sha256": "dfc910a776885a409b8e5e54a132c12dd9bae04f51da4883574a04ca9a95f696"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Patchwise Global Certification", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:patchwise_global_certification", "slug": "patchwise_global_certification"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system wants to make a whole-system claim without inspecting or proving the whole monolithically, but local checks can be incomplete, incompatible, biased by the cover, or invalid under the intended aggregation rule.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system wants to make a whole-system claim without inspecting or proving the whole monolithically, but local checks can be incomplete, incompatible, biased by the cover, or invalid under the intended aggregation rule."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A manifold can be globally simple and need not be costly to evaluate.", "slug": "manifold"}], "residual_id": "r:patchwise_global_certification:b047_a06_c1", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b047_a06_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The whole is too large, distributed, complex, continuous, regulated, or costly to evaluate as one undivided object. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The whole is too large, distributed, complex, continuous, regulated, or costly to evaluate as one undivided object."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A manifold can be globally simple and need not be costly to evaluate.", "slug": "manifold"}], "normalized_requirement": "The whole is too large or costly to evaluate monolithically.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The whole is too large or costly to evaluate monolithically.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record combines bounded local results under an aggregation rule to establish a global property.", "role_mapping": "Patches -> local units; checks -> local evidence; assessment -> global aggregate.", "slug": "local_to_global_aggregation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b047_a06_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Local checks, tests, witnesses, proofs, measurements, or inspections are tractable and meaningful within bounded patches. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Local checks, tests, witnesses, proofs, measurements, or inspections are tractable and meaningful within bounded patches."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Local-to-Global Aggregation", "one_liner": "Locally checkable properties promote to a global verdict under an explicit aggregation discipline.", "page_ref": "prime:local_to_global_aggregation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Patches -> local units; checks -> local evidence; assessment -> global aggregate.", "slug": "local_to_global_aggregation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record combines bounded local results under an aggregation rule to establish a global property."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Bounded local checks are meaningful and can be composed toward a global assessment.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P088-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the possibility of a failure arising at the selected inter-patch site.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The selected inter-patch site may create or contain a failure.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve invisibility to every isolated single-locality check.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "No single local check sees that failure.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the source's may-level modality.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Creation of the hidden failure is possible rather than asserted to be inevitable.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires the hidden failure to arise at a patch boundary.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The selected inter-patch site is a patch boundary.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires the hidden failure to arise at a patch overlap.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The selected inter-patch site is a patch overlap.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires the hidden failure to arise at an interface.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The selected inter-patch site is an interface.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires the hidden failure to arise at a level boundary.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The selected inter-patch site is a level boundary.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires the hidden failure to arise at a handoff.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The selected inter-patch site is a handoff.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A failure arising at one listed kind of inter-patch site may be invisible to every single local check.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "inter-patch failure is invisible to isolated checks", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P088-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A local-to-global composition can have complete compatible coverage and no boundary failure.", "slug": "local_to_global_aggregation"}], "residual_id": "r:patchwise_global_certification:b047_a06_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b047_a06_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Patch boundaries, overlaps, interfaces, levels, or handoffs may create failures that no single local check sees. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Patch boundaries, overlaps, interfaces, levels, or handoffs may create failures that no single local check sees."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "If one branch alone revealed the competing edit, the two-branch overlap and three-way conflict would not exist; the isolated-check counterexample therefore fails.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Merge Conflict", "one_liner": "Halt an automatic merge and hand the decision to a human exactly where two branches diverged from their common ancestor on the same region, because a three-way merge over text can rank a one-sided edit but has no syntactic basis to choose between two competing edits whose correctness lives in intent it cannot see.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:merge_conflict", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "merge_conflict"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "merge_conflict", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P088-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent reconciliation confirms the raw exact-record mapping under universal necessity. Every complete merge-conflict instance entails the patch-overlap branch of the source DNF."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Patch boundaries or overlaps may contain failures invisible to every isolated check.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime permits simple additive aggregation and does not require a non-sum rule.", "slug": "local_to_global_aggregation"}], "residual_id": "r:patchwise_global_certification:b047_a06_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b047_a06_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The aggregation rule is not simple summation; it requires compatibility, coverage, ordering, weighting, induction, consensus, or gluing logic. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The aggregation rule is not simple summation; it requires compatibility, coverage, ordering, weighting, induction, consensus, or gluing logic."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime permits simple additive aggregation and does not require a non-sum rule.", "slug": "local_to_global_aggregation"}], "normalized_requirement": "The global aggregation requires coverage, compatibility, order, weighting, induction, consensus, or gluing rather than bare summation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The global aggregation requires coverage, compatibility, order, weighting, induction, consensus, or gluing rather than bare summation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A global verdict is needed: certified safe, complete, valid, legal, covered, consistent, stable, acceptable, or ready.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Local evaluation makes global certification tractable, but local truth is not automatically global truth; the pattern must balance decomposition efficiency against seam risk, cover bias, aggregation error, and false confidence. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: A global verdict is needed: certified safe, complete, valid, legal, covered, consistent, stable, acceptable, or ready. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A global verdict is needed: certified safe, complete, valid, legal, covered, consistent, stable, acceptable, or ready.", "Local evaluation makes global certification tractable, but local truth is not automatically global truth; the pattern must balance decomposition efficiency against seam risk, cover bias, aggregation error, and false confidence."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "A global verdict is needed: certified safe, complete, valid, legal, covered, consistent, stable, acceptable, or ready."}, {"display_text": "Auditors, operators, or downstream users need to trace the global verdict back to local evidence and exceptions.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Local evaluation makes global certification tractable, but local truth is not automatically global truth; the pattern must balance decomposition efficiency against seam risk, cover bias, aggregation error, and false confidence. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: Auditors, operators, or downstream users need to trace the global verdict back to local evidence and exceptions. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Auditors, operators, or downstream users need to trace the global verdict back to local evidence and exceptions.", "Local evaluation makes global certification tractable, but local truth is not automatically global truth; the pattern must balance decomposition efficiency against seam risk, cover bias, aggregation error, and false confidence."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Auditors, operators, or downstream users need to trace the global verdict back to local evidence and exceptions."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 47, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-047", "ledger_sha256": "dfc910a776885a409b8e5e54a132c12dd9bae04f51da4883574a04ca9a95f696"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Path Redundancy Provisioning", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:path_redundancy_provisioning", "slug": "path_redundancy_provisioning"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 4 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a **single-path dependency**. A system needs continuity, but the route that carries the critical flow has no credible substitute. A local failure becomes system-level disconnection because the topology has no alternate way through.\n\nThis problem often hides behind ordinary success. A single route can look efficient when nothing is wrong. It is cheaper, easier to explain, and easier to govern. The weakness becomes visible only under stress: a provider outage, a road closure, a person’s absence, a platform failure, a legal blockage, a compromised channel, or an overloaded approval queue.\n\nA second problem is false redundancy. Systems often believe they have backups because they have multiple names, channels, vendors, or tools. But if every path depends on the same login system, bridge, cloud region, contract broker, manager, or social gatekeeper, the topology is still fragile.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A critical flow, relationship, communication, authority chain, supply route, or connection depends on one path whose failure would sever reachability or continuity."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires one component or path whose failure alone disables the critical function.", "role_mapping": "Single route -> single failure point; destination reachability -> critical function.", "slug": "single_point_of_failure", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b047_a07_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The system has a single path to a critical destination. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The system has a single path to a critical destination."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Single Point of Failure", "one_liner": "A component on the critical path of every essential function, with no parallel route, that caps the whole system's reliability at its own.", "page_ref": "prime:single_point_of_failure", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Single route -> single failure point; destination reachability -> critical function.", "slug": "single_point_of_failure", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires one component or path whose failure alone disables the critical function."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A critical destination is reachable through only one path.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A single point exists structurally even when failure likelihood has not been assessed.", "slug": "single_point_of_failure"}], "residual_id": "r:path_redundancy_provisioning:b047_a07_c2", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b047_a07_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Path redundancy should be evaluated against the failure scenarios it is meant to survive. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The primary path has credible failure, overload, blockage, or capture scenarios.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The primary path has credible failure, overload, blockage, or capture scenarios.", "Path redundancy should be evaluated against the failure scenarios it is meant to survive."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A single point exists structurally even when failure likelihood has not been assessed.", "slug": "single_point_of_failure"}], "normalized_requirement": "The primary path has credible failure, overload, blockage, or capture scenarios.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The primary path has credible failure, overload, blockage, or capture scenarios.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A failed single point can be replaced quickly and safely.", "slug": "single_point_of_failure"}], "residual_id": "r:path_redundancy_provisioning:b047_a07_c3", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b047_a07_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Improvising a new route during failure would be too slow or risky. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Improvising a new route during failure would be too slow or risky."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A failed single point can be replaced quickly and safely.", "slug": "single_point_of_failure"}], "normalized_requirement": "Improvising a replacement route during failure would be too slow or risky.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Improvising a replacement route during failure would be too slow or risky.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Dependency concentration can involve components rather than supposedly independent paths.", "slug": "dependency_distribution_concentration"}], "residual_id": "r:path_redundancy_provisioning:b047_a07_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b047_a07_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The apparent redundancy may share hidden dependencies. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The apparent redundancy may share hidden dependencies."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Dependency concentration can involve components rather than supposedly independent paths.", "slug": "dependency_distribution_concentration"}], "normalized_requirement": "Nominal alternate paths may share hidden dependencies.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Nominal alternate paths may share hidden dependencies.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The continuity requirement is stronger than the cost-minimization requirement.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: The continuity requirement is stronger than the cost-minimization requirement. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The continuity requirement is stronger than the cost-minimization requirement."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The continuity requirement is stronger than the cost-minimization requirement."}, {"display_text": "Alternate paths can be made usable without destroying governance or safety.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Some alternate paths create more risk than they remove. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: Alternate paths can be made usable without destroying governance or safety. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Alternate paths can be made usable without destroying governance or safety.", "Some alternate paths create more risk than they remove."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Alternate paths can be made usable without destroying governance or safety."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 47, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-047", "ledger_sha256": "dfc910a776885a409b8e5e54a132c12dd9bae04f51da4883574a04ca9a95f696"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Pattern Detection with Validation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:pattern_detection_with_validation", "slug": "pattern_detection_with_validation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a split pressure. On one side, repeated structure may be real and valuable; ignoring it keeps the system blind. On the other side, random clusters, changed measurement practices, vivid examples, and motivated attention can all look like meaningful pattern. The same cognitive capacity that lets people recognize structure also lets them over-recognize it.\n\nThe failure usually appears as premature certainty. A cluster becomes a trend, a familiar signature becomes a diagnosis, or a dashboard shape becomes proof. The opposite failure is excessive dismissal: weak early signals are rejected because they are not yet strong enough to meet a final-proof threshold.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Actors either miss repeated structure or overinterpret noise as meaningful pattern, causing delayed recognition on one side and false certainty on the other."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Pattern recognition can successfully identify clear structure and does not require uncertainty.", "slug": "pattern_recognition"}], "residual_id": "r:pattern_detection_with_validation:b047_a08_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b047_a08_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Many observations, incidents, cases, symptoms, events, traces, or examples are available, but their structure is not yet clear. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Many observations, incidents, cases, symptoms, events, traces, or examples are available, but their structure is not yet clear."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Pattern recognition can successfully identify clear structure and does not require uncertainty.", "slug": "pattern_recognition"}], "normalized_requirement": "Many observations are available but their repeated structure is unclear.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Many observations are available but their repeated structure is unclear.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Recognized patterns can be low-stakes and need not recur.", "slug": "pattern_recognition"}], "residual_id": "r:pattern_detection_with_validation:b047_a08_c2", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b047_a08_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A recurring cluster, anomaly, trend, or signature appears important enough to influence decisions. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A recurring cluster, anomaly, trend, or signature appears important enough to influence decisions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Recognized patterns can be low-stakes and need not recur.", "slug": "pattern_recognition"}], "normalized_requirement": "A candidate recurring pattern appears important enough to influence decisions.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A candidate recurring pattern appears important enough to influence decisions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Signal detection entails an error tradeoff but not material cost on both error types.", "slug": "signal_detection_theory"}], "residual_id": "r:pattern_detection_with_validation:b047_a08_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b047_a08_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The cost of either missing a real pattern or acting on a false pattern is significant. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The cost of either missing a real pattern or acting on a false pattern is significant."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Signal detection entails an error tradeoff but not material cost on both error types.", "slug": "signal_detection_theory"}], "normalized_requirement": "Both missing a real pattern and acting on a false pattern have material cost.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Both missing a real pattern and acting on a false pattern have material cost.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A pattern can be recognized with decisive evidence and need not remain provisional.", "slug": "pattern_recognition"}], "residual_id": "r:pattern_detection_with_validation:b047_a08_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b047_a08_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A model, dashboard, expert, team, or pattern library is producing plausible matches that require validation. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A model, dashboard, expert, team, or pattern library is producing plausible matches that require validation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A pattern can be recognized with decisive evidence and need not remain provisional.", "slug": "pattern_recognition"}], "normalized_requirement": "A plausible pattern match remains provisional until independently validated.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A plausible pattern match remains provisional until independently validated.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "People are relying on pattern recognition under uncertainty, time pressure, incomplete evidence, or high stakes.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when people or systems are acting on repeated cases, anomalies, trends, diagnostic signatures, or pattern-library matches. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: People are relying on pattern recognition under uncertainty, time pressure, incomplete evidence, or high stakes. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["People are relying on pattern recognition under uncertainty, time pressure, incomplete evidence, or high stakes.", "Use this archetype when people or systems are acting on repeated cases, anomalies, trends, diagnostic signatures, or pattern-library matches."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "People are relying on pattern recognition under uncertainty, time pressure, incomplete evidence, or high stakes."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 47, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-047", "ledger_sha256": "dfc910a776885a409b8e5e54a132c12dd9bae04f51da4883574a04ca9a95f696"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Pattern–Rhythm Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:pattern_rhythm_design", "slug": "pattern_rhythm_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 1 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 1}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Ungoverned repetition often starts with one attractive unit and a copy command. That produces instances but not necessarily a pattern system. At edges the copies collide; at larger scale the rhythm disappears; under production tolerances intervals drift; in another context the same motif acquires a different meaning; under accessibility conditions the field flickers or becomes noise. Local fixes accumulate as exceptions until no one can predict what belongs.\n\nThe structural tension is sameness across change. Too little recurrence and observers cannot build expectation or perceive a family. Too much recurrence and the field becomes monotonous, hides meaningful differences, or dominates the primary task. Variation can preserve attention and adapt to context, but without invariants and a budget it becomes randomness. A break can communicate priority or transition, but only if the preceding regularity makes it interpretable.\n\nA mature intervention replaces implicit taste with inspectable rules while preserving room for judgment. It makes claims testable: what is the motif, which transformations preserve it, what interval produces the intended grouping, where does an exception belong, how does the pattern terminate, and who repairs drift?", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Repeated elements are being copied or improvised without an explicit grammar, so the field lacks reliable identity, pacing, meaningful variation, boundary behavior, cross-scale coherence, or maintenance discipline. The result may be monotonous, noisy, misleading, difficult to fabricate, inaccessible, or unable to adapt without drift."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P088-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve one pattern as the entity extending across the boundary.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A focal pattern is present on more than one side of a boundary.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail cross-boundary extension, not merely proximity to a boundary.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The pattern crosses the selected boundary.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires the pattern to cross an edge.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The crossed boundary is an edge.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires the pattern to cross scales.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The crossed boundary is between scales.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires the pattern to cross media.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The crossed boundary is between media.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires the pattern to cross contexts.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The crossed boundary is between contexts.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires the pattern to cross production methods.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The crossed boundary is between production methods.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "The pattern crosses one listed kind of boundary.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "pattern crosses a boundary", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P088-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A designed pattern can remain within one surface and scale.", "slug": "pattern_in_design"}], "residual_id": "r:pattern_rhythm_design:b047_a09_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b047_a09_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "At edges the copies collide; at larger scale the rhythm disappears; under production tolerances intervals drift; in another context the same motif acquires a different meaning; under accessibility conditions the field flickers or becomes noise. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The pattern crosses edges, scales, media, contexts, or production methods.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["the pattern crosses edges, scales, media, contexts, or production methods", "At edges the copies collide; at larger scale the rhythm disappears; under production tolerances intervals drift; in another context the same motif acquires a different meaning; under accessibility conditions the field flickers or becomes noise."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "For a composed artifact spanning multiple media, propagation discipline cannot govern every local choice while the organizing pattern fails to cross the media boundary.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Aesthetic Coherence", "one_liner": "The holistic judgement that a composed artifact's parts belong together under a shared organising constraint, recognised faster than analysed — detectable from any patch yet localisable to none — with variety resolving into unity rather than accumulating as juxtaposition.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:aesthetic_coherence", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2", "O5"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "artifact_spans_multiple_media", "predicate": "The composed artifact spans multiple media.", "rationale": "The exact DSA plus the emitted qualifier, if any, necessarily satisfies the selected complete DNF branch without role or direction laundering."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "aesthetic_coherence"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "artifact_spans_multiple_media"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "aesthetic_coherence", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P088-C12-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent reconciliation confirms the raw exact-record mapping under universal necessity. The candidate supplies pattern propagation; the single qualifier only selects an explicitly supported multi-media artifact instance and thereby completes one source branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A complete rondo without the refrain recurring across intervening section edges is not a rondo, so the direct counterexample fails.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Rondo Form", "one_liner": "A large-scale musical structure that coheres by periodic return: a recurring principal theme (the refrain, A) in the tonic alternates with contrasting episodes (B, C, D) in related keys, yielding schemata like ABACA in which the refrain becomes the listener's memory.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:rondo_form", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "rondo_form"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "rondo_form", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P088-C12-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent reconciliation confirms the raw exact-record mapping under universal necessity. The recurring A refrain directly entails the edge branch of the source DNF."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A complete sonata-form movement without thematic material recurring across exposition, development, and recapitulation boundaries lacks the candidate's defining return.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Sonata Form", "one_liner": "Organise a movement as a tonal journey out of the home key and back — exposition posing a conflict when the second theme sounds abroad, development intensifying it, recapitulation healing it by bringing that theme home — so closure is reconciliation, not mere stopping.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:sonata_form", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "sonata_form"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "sonata_form", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P088-C12-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent reconciliation confirms the raw exact-record mapping under universal necessity. The theme's return across formal sections directly entails the edge branch."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The pattern crosses edges, scales, media, contexts, or production methods.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "a motif must recur across a surface, sequence, environment, product family, or information display.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when recurrence is meant to be perceived or relied on: a facade bay, textile repeat, information-card anatomy, paving rhythm, motion phrase, product-family motif, modular joint, or recurring signal. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: a motif must recur across a surface, sequence, environment, product family, or information display. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["a motif must recur across a surface, sequence, environment, product family, or information display", "Use this archetype when recurrence is meant to be perceived or relied on: a facade bay, textile repeat, information-card anatomy, paving rhythm, motion phrase, product-family motif, modular joint, or recurring signal."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "a motif must recur across a surface, sequence, environment, product family, or information display"}, {"display_text": "users need to perceive grouping, rhythm, continuity, state, or identity through repetition.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: users need to perceive grouping, rhythm, continuity, state, or identity through repetition. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["users need to perceive grouping, rhythm, continuity, state, or identity through repetition"]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "users need to perceive grouping, rhythm, continuity, state, or identity through repetition"}, {"display_text": "multiple creators or tools must extend a pattern consistently.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when many instances, creators, tools, scales, or contexts must remain recognizably related without becoming identical. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: multiple creators or tools must extend a pattern consistently. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["multiple creators or tools must extend a pattern consistently", "It is especially useful when many instances, creators, tools, scales, or contexts must remain recognizably related without becoming identical."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "multiple creators or tools must extend a pattern consistently"}, {"display_text": "variation is desired but cannot be arbitrary.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: variation is desired but cannot be arbitrary. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["variation is desired but cannot be arbitrary"]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "variation is desired but cannot be arbitrary"}, {"display_text": "a controlled break must signal emphasis, transition, exception, or closure.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A break can communicate priority or transition, but only if the preceding regularity makes it interpretable. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: a controlled break must signal emphasis, transition, exception, or closure. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["a controlled break must signal emphasis, transition, exception, or closure", "A break can communicate priority or transition, but only if the preceding regularity makes it interpretable."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "a controlled break must signal emphasis, transition, exception, or closure"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 47, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-047", "ledger_sha256": "dfc910a776885a409b8e5e54a132c12dd9bae04f51da4883574a04ca9a95f696"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Payoff Restructuring", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:payoff_restructuring", "slug": "payoff_restructuring"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a mismatch between system-level value and local actor payoff. The larger system may benefit from prevention, cooperation, truthfulness, contribution, quality, or restraint, while the actor who must choose those behaviors bears more cost than benefit. Over time, actors learn the actual payoff structure, not the declared values.\n\nThis is why purely moral language often fails. If the organization says “prioritize safety” but promotes only speed, speed is the real payoff. If a platform says “be reliable” but gives the same visibility to unreliable participants, reliability is under-rewarded. If a shared resource benefits everyone but contribution is optional and invisible, noncontribution becomes rational.\n\nThe problem becomes more difficult when actors can game measurements. A poorly designed payoff can reward the appearance of the target behavior while degrading the real outcome. The archetype therefore treats monitoring, verification, and adaptation as part of the structure, not as administrative details.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Multiple actors or decision units make interdependent choices, and the current distribution of rewards, costs, effort, risk, status, or opportunity makes a harmful or suboptimal action rational from the actor perspective. The system may be asking for one behavior while paying for another."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Moral hazard requires insulated downside but not awareness, training, or stated agreement.", "slug": "moral_hazard"}], "residual_id": "r:payoff_restructuring:b047_a10_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b047_a10_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Actors repeatedly choose an undesired behavior despite awareness, training, or stated agreement. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Actors repeatedly choose an undesired behavior despite awareness, training, or stated agreement."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Moral hazard requires insulated downside but not awareness, training, or stated agreement.", "slug": "moral_hazard"}], "normalized_requirement": "Actors repeatedly choose an undesired behavior despite awareness or agreement.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Actors repeatedly choose an undesired behavior despite awareness or agreement.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Moral hazard shifts downside but need not involve a prosocial behavior whose benefit accrues elsewhere.", "slug": "moral_hazard"}], "residual_id": "r:payoff_restructuring:b047_a10_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b047_a10_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The benefits of good behavior accrue to someone other than the actor who must bear the cost. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The benefits of good behavior accrue to someone other than the actor who must bear the cost."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Moral hazard shifts downside but need not involve a prosocial behavior whose benefit accrues elsewhere.", "slug": "moral_hazard"}], "normalized_requirement": "Good behavior benefits another actor while the acting party bears its cost.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Good behavior benefits another actor while the acting party bears its cost.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P088-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve directional favoring produced by the mechanism.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The selected governance mechanism favors an action.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve misalignment toward the wrong action.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The favored action is the wrong action rather than the intended action.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve lack of intent behind the misaligned incentive.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The favoring of the wrong action is unintentional.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires punishment to unintentionally favor the wrong action.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The governance mechanism is punishment.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires rewards to unintentionally favor the wrong action.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The governance mechanism is rewards.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires metrics to unintentionally favor the wrong action.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The governance mechanism is metrics.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires access rules to unintentionally favor the wrong action.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The governance mechanism is access rules.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "One listed governance mechanism unintentionally favors the wrong action.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "governance mechanism unintentionally favors wrong action", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P088-C13-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An incentive can favor the intended action.", "slug": "incentive"}], "residual_id": "r:payoff_restructuring:b047_a10_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b047_a10_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Punishment, rewards, metrics, or access rules unintentionally favor the wrong action. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Punishment, rewards, metrics, or access rules unintentionally favor the wrong action."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A group satisfying the visible-contribution reward and participation-by-comprehension mechanism cannot allocate deliberation by consequence instead of favoring trivial contribution.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Parkinson's Law of Triviality (Bikeshedding)", "one_liner": "Explain why a deliberating group allocates time to agenda items in inverse proportion to their consequence — because members contribute only where they can comprehend, so trivial-but-familiar items draw everyone while consequential-but-technical ones defer to a few.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:parkinsons_law_of_triviality", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "parkinsons_law_of_triviality"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "parkinsons_law_of_triviality", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P088-C13-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent reconciliation confirms the raw exact-record mapping under universal necessity. The reward branch O1-O2-O3-O5 is directly entailed with the unintended causal direction preserved."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "When the team does not intend the outcome-degrading actions, the metric's optimization and social-reinforcement loops still necessarily favor those wrong actions.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Vanity-Metric Addiction", "one_liner": "A team locks onto a metric chosen for how impressive it looks rather than its causal link to the outcome, then keeps it after the disconnect is known because dropping it carries social cost.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:vanity_metric_addiction", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O3"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "metric_misalignment_is_unintended", "predicate": "The team does not intend the outcome-degrading actions favored by the vanity metric.", "rationale": "The exact DSA plus the emitted qualifier, if any, necessarily satisfies the selected complete DNF branch without role or direction laundering."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "vanity_metric_addiction"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "metric_misalignment_is_unintended"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "vanity_metric_addiction", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P088-C13-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent reconciliation confirms the raw exact-record mapping under universal necessity. The full metric-to-wrong-action spine is direct; one contingent intent fact supplies only the source polarity and does not rewrite the mechanism."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "An instance in which the measure becomes the operative referent under load cannot keep effort aligned only to the broader construct while preserving surrogation.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Surrogation", "one_liner": "Explain why a well-designed metric drifts from its purpose even absent any gaming: under load an accountable manager mentally replaces the strategic construct with its measure, treating the number as the thing itself rather than a partial proxy for it.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:surrogation", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "surrogation"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "surrogation", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P088-C13-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent reconciliation confirms the raw exact-record mapping under universal necessity. The metric branch O1-O2-O3-O6 is directly entailed, including the required lack of intent."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Rewards, punishments, metrics, or access rules favor the wrong action.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires an actor insulated from part of the downside to rationally take more risk or effort-reducing action.", "role_mapping": "Defection or shirking -> hidden action; private payoff -> insulated benefit; shifted harm -> externalized downside.", "slug": "moral_hazard", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b047_a10_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A coordination, compliance, safety, quality, or contribution problem persists because defecting or shirking has a better private payoff. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A coordination, compliance, safety, quality, or contribution problem persists because defecting or shirking has a better private payoff."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Moral Hazard", "one_liner": "Risk-taking under protection.", "page_ref": "prime:moral_hazard", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Defection or shirking -> hidden action; private payoff -> insulated benefit; shifted harm -> externalized downside.", "slug": "moral_hazard", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires an actor insulated from part of the downside to rationally take more risk or effort-reducing action."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Defection or shirking has a better private payoff because its downside is shifted or hidden.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Moral hazard can increase unobservable risk without a metric, loophole, or visible-output game.", "slug": "moral_hazard"}], "residual_id": "r:payoff_restructuring:b047_a10_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b047_a10_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Actors appear to game a metric, exploit a loophole, shift harm to others, or optimize visible output while degrading the underlying outcome. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Actors appear to game a metric, exploit a loophole, shift harm to others, or optimize visible output while degrading the underlying outcome."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Moral hazard can increase unobservable risk without a metric, loophole, or visible-output game.", "slug": "moral_hazard"}], "normalized_requirement": "Actors game a metric, exploit a loophole, or improve visible output while degrading the underlying outcome.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Actors game a metric, exploit a loophole, or improve visible output while degrading the underlying outcome.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 47, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-047", "ledger_sha256": "dfc910a776885a409b8e5e54a132c12dd9bae04f51da4883574a04ca9a95f696"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Peer Sanctioning Governance", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:peer_sanctioning_governance", "slug": "peer_sanctioning_governance"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A norm matters for cooperation, safety, exchange, trust, identity, or collective viability, but formal enforcement is unavailable, too slow, too expensive, not trusted, outside the relevant jurisdiction, or unable to see everyday conduct. If no informal enforcement exists, violations become cheap and compliant actors feel exploited. If informal enforcement exists without design, it can become gossip, scapegoating, clique power, vigilantism, discriminatory exclusion, or permanent reputational harm.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A norm matters for cooperation, safety, exchange, trust, identity, or collective viability, but formal enforcement is unavailable, too slow, too expensive, not trusted, outside the relevant jurisdiction, or unable to see everyday conduct. If no informal enforcement exists, violations become cheap and compliant actors feel exploited. If informal enforcement exists without design, it can become gossip, scapegoating, clique power, vigilantism, discriminatory exclusion, or permanent reputational harm."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record applies decentralized peer sanction where formal monitoring or enforcement is unavailable or costly.", "role_mapping": "Formal authority -> centralized enforcer; everyday conduct -> local behavior; policing gap -> informal enforcement domain.", "slug": "informal_enforcement", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b047_a11_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Compliance depends on everyday behavior that formal authority cannot continuously observe or efficiently police. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Compliance depends on everyday behavior that formal authority cannot continuously observe or efficiently police."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Informal Enforcement", "one_liner": "Norm compliance sustained by decentralized social sanction rather than formal authority.", "page_ref": "prime:informal_enforcement", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Formal authority -> centralized enforcer; everyday conduct -> local behavior; policing gap -> informal enforcement domain.", "slug": "informal_enforcement", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record applies decentralized peer sanction where formal monitoring or enforcement is unavailable or costly."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Everyday compliance cannot be continuously observed or efficiently policed by formal authority.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires shared behavioral expectations backed by anticipated decentralized approval or sanction.", "role_mapping": "Group -> reference group; compliance -> prescribed behavior; violation -> sanctioned deviation.", "slug": "social_norms", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b047_a11_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The relevant group has enough shared expectation to distinguish norm compliance from norm violation. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The relevant group has enough shared expectation to distinguish norm compliance from norm violation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Social Norms", "one_liner": "Shared expectations about how members of a reference group should behave, maintained through internalization and anticipated decentralized approval, correction, or sanction.", "page_ref": "prime:social_norms", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Group -> reference group; compliance -> prescribed behavior; violation -> sanctioned deviation.", "slug": "social_norms", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires shared behavioral expectations backed by anticipated decentralized approval or sanction."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A reference group shares an expectation that distinguishes compliant from violating behavior.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Decentralized sanctions operate through reputation, access, reciprocity, or exclusion before state or formal process.", "role_mapping": "Peer response -> informal sanction; standing -> reputation or access.", "slug": "informal_enforcement", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b047_a11_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Peer response can change incentives or standing before problems require formal adjudication. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Peer response can change incentives or standing before problems require formal adjudication."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Informal Enforcement", "one_liner": "Norm compliance sustained by decentralized social sanction rather than formal authority.", "page_ref": "prime:informal_enforcement", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Peer response -> informal sanction; standing -> reputation or access.", "slug": "informal_enforcement", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Decentralized sanctions operate through reputation, access, reciprocity, or exclusion before state or formal process."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Peer response can change incentives or standing before formal adjudication.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Informal enforcement can address direct visible harm and does not require diffuse costs or a helpless victim.", "slug": "informal_enforcement"}], "residual_id": "r:peer_sanctioning_governance:b047_a11_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b047_a11_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The costs of noncompliance are diffuse, delayed, relational, or collective, so victims may not be able to enforce alone. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The costs of noncompliance are diffuse, delayed, relational, or collective, so victims may not be able to enforce alone."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Informal enforcement can address direct visible harm and does not require diffuse costs or a helpless victim.", "slug": "informal_enforcement"}], "normalized_requirement": "Noncompliance costs are diffuse or delayed so one victim cannot enforce alone.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Noncompliance costs are diffuse or delayed so one victim cannot enforce alone.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Participants care about future relationships, reputation, belonging, access, referrals, or exchange opportunities.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Participants care about future relationships, reputation, belonging, access, referrals, or exchange opportunities. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Participants care about future relationships, reputation, belonging, access, referrals, or exchange opportunities."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "Participants care about future relationships, reputation, belonging, access, referrals, or exchange opportunities."}, {"display_text": "Formal escalation remains possible for severe, contested, unsafe, or rights-sensitive cases but should not be the first line for every breach.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It must remain socially embedded enough to work without formal authority while becoming explicit and constrained enough to avoid arbitrary punishment, domination, surveillance, and permanent stigma. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: Formal escalation remains possible for severe, contested, unsafe, or rights-sensitive cases but should not be the first line for every breach. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Formal escalation remains possible for severe, contested, unsafe, or rights-sensitive cases but should not be the first line for every breach.", "It must remain socially embedded enough to work without formal authority while becoming explicit and constrained enough to avoid arbitrary punishment, domination, surveillance, and permanent stigma."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Formal escalation remains possible for severe, contested, unsafe, or rights-sensitive cases but should not be the first line for every breach."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 47, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-047", "ledger_sha256": "dfc910a776885a409b8e5e54a132c12dd9bae04f51da4883574a04ca9a95f696"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Perceived-Consensus Calibration", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:perceived_consensus_calibration", "slug": "perceived_consensus_calibration"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 5, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A person, team, leader, designer, expert, or institution believes that its own view, local peer group, meeting room, customer sample, online audience, or visible supporters represent what most people think or do. Because the evidence is self-anchored and nonrandom, the system overestimates consensus, underestimates minority or absent views, and commits to decisions, messages, designs, policies, or norms that later meet surprise resistance or miss real variation.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A person, team, leader, designer, expert, or institution believes that its own view, local peer group, meeting room, customer sample, online audience, or visible supporters represent what most people think or do. Because the evidence is self-anchored and nonrandom, the system overestimates consensus, underestimates minority or absent views, and commits to decisions, messages, designs, policies, or norms that later meet surprise resistance or miss real variation."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P088-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a claim that generalizes to a broad population or collective.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A speaker asserts a universal, representative, or consensus claim about a population.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the lack of evidence at the population level.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Population-level evidence for that claim is absent.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the mismatch between population-wide language and the evidence supporting it.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The breadth of the claim exceeds the evidentiary population support provided for it.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "A speaker makes a population-wide or universal-consensus claim without population-level evidence.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "universal-consensus claim lacks population evidence", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P088-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Conformity can occur with accurate evidence about the majority and does not require a universal claim.", "slug": "conformity"}], "residual_id": "r:perceived_consensus_calibration:b047_a12_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b047_a12_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Someone uses language such as “everyone,” “users want,” “the team agrees,” “normal people,” “the community,” or “we all know” without population evidence. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Someone uses language such as “everyone,” “users want,” “the team agrees,” “normal people,” “the community,” or “we all know” without population evidence."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Conformity can occur with accurate evidence about the majority and does not require a universal claim.", "slug": "conformity"}], "normalized_requirement": "A universal-consensus claim is made without population evidence.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A universal-consensus claim is made without population evidence.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A silence spiral distorts expression through social cost but does not require an insider or expert sampling frame.", "slug": "spiral_of_silence"}], "residual_id": "r:perceived_consensus_calibration:b047_a12_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b047_a12_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The visible sample comes from friends, insiders, power users, meeting attendees, vocal supporters, online followers, experts, or respondents with high motivation to speak. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The visible sample comes from friends, insiders, power users, meeting attendees, vocal supporters, online followers, experts, or respondents with high motivation to speak."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A silence spiral distorts expression through social cost but does not require an insider or expert sampling frame.", "slug": "spiral_of_silence"}], "normalized_requirement": "The visible opinion sample is selected from socially proximate, vocal, expert, or highly motivated participants.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The visible opinion sample is selected from socially proximate, vocal, expert, or highly motivated participants.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Conformity does not require the decision-maker to share identity or environment with a sample.", "slug": "conformity"}], "residual_id": "r:perceived_consensus_calibration:b047_a12_c4", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b047_a12_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A person, team, leader, designer, expert, or institution believes that its own view, local peer group, meeting room, customer sample, online audience, or visible supporters represent what most people think or do. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The decision-maker shares identity, expertise, incentives, or environment with the visible sample.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The decision-maker shares identity, expertise, incentives, or environment with the visible sample.", "A person, team, leader, designer, expert, or institution believes that its own view, local peer group, meeting room, customer sample, online audience, or visible supporters represent what most people think or do."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Conformity does not require the decision-maker to share identity or environment with a sample.", "slug": "conformity"}], "normalized_requirement": "The decision-maker shares identity, expertise, incentives, or environment with the visible sample.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The decision-maker shares identity, expertise, incentives, or environment with the visible sample.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A spiral requires socially costly expression, not every listed form of nonresponse or access exclusion.", "slug": "spiral_of_silence"}], "residual_id": "r:perceived_consensus_calibration:b047_a12_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b047_a12_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Quiet, absent, low-power, inconvenient, nonresponding, or hard-to-reach groups may disagree or behave differently. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Quiet, absent, low-power, inconvenient, nonresponding, or hard-to-reach groups may disagree or behave differently."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A spiral requires socially costly expression, not every listed form of nonresponse or access exclusion.", "slug": "spiral_of_silence"}], "normalized_requirement": "Quiet, absent, low-power, nonresponding, or hard-to-reach groups may differ from the visible sample.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Quiet, absent, low-power, nonresponding, or hard-to-reach groups may differ from the visible sample.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Groupthink can arise without a population-prevalence claim or anecdotal sample.", "slug": "groupthink"}], "residual_id": "r:perceived_consensus_calibration:b047_a12_c7", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b047_a12_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The group is under time pressure and tempted to treat anecdotal agreement as enough evidence. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The group is under time pressure and tempted to treat anecdotal agreement as enough evidence."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Groupthink can arise without a population-prevalence claim or anecdotal sample.", "slug": "groupthink"}], "normalized_requirement": "Time pressure encourages anecdotal agreement to substitute for prevalence evidence.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Time pressure encourages anecdotal agreement to substitute for prevalence evidence.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A decision depends on the prevalence of a belief, behavior, preference, norm, or acceptance level.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: A decision depends on the prevalence of a belief, behavior, preference, norm, or acceptance level. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A decision depends on the prevalence of a belief, behavior, preference, norm, or acceptance level."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "A decision depends on the prevalence of a belief, behavior, preference, norm, or acceptance level."}, {"display_text": "Public, employee, customer, patient, student, or stakeholder legitimacy depends on distinguishing actual prevalence from local projection.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A person, team, leader, designer, expert, or institution believes that its own view, local peer group, meeting room, customer sample, online audience, or visible supporters represent what most people think or do. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Public, employee, customer, patient, student, or stakeholder legitimacy depends on distinguishing actual prevalence from local projection. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Public, employee, customer, patient, student, or stakeholder legitimacy depends on distinguishing actual prevalence from local projection.", "A person, team, leader, designer, expert, or institution believes that its own view, local peer group, meeting room, customer sample, online audience, or visible supporters represent what most people think or do."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Public, employee, customer, patient, student, or stakeholder legitimacy depends on distinguishing actual prevalence from local projection."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 47, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-047", "ledger_sha256": "dfc910a776885a409b8e5e54a132c12dd9bae04f51da4883574a04ca9a95f696"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Perception-Comprehension-Projection Loop Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:perception_comprehension_projection_loop_design", "slug": "perception_comprehension_projection_loop_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 7 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 7}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Actors must act in a changing system, but their awareness state is fragmented across raw signals, local interpretations, stale assumptions, private mental models, and untested projections, so action is based on an incomplete or outdated picture of what is happening and what is likely to happen next.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Actors must act in a changing system, but their awareness state is fragmented across raw signals, local interpretations, stale assumptions, private mental models, and untested projections, so action is based on an incomplete or outdated picture of what is happening and what is likely to happen next."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact model updates perception, comprehension, and projection in a dynamic operating environment.", "role_mapping": "Environment -> situation; unfolding action -> decision cycle; change -> temporal update.", "slug": "situation_awareness", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b047_a13_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The environment changes while decisions, handoffs, or interventions are still unfolding. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The environment changes while decisions, handoffs, or interventions are still unfolding."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Situation Awareness", "one_liner": "Acting on a system that keeps moving requires three distinct cognitive products — perceiving current elements, comprehending their meaning, and projecting their near-future trajectory.", "page_ref": "prime:situation_awareness", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Environment -> situation; unfolding action -> decision cycle; change -> temporal update.", "slug": "situation_awareness", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact model updates perception, comprehension, and projection in a dynamic operating environment."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The environment changes while decisions or interventions unfold.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P088-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve available information as the distributed object.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Information relevant to the focal activity is available.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail dispersion across plural loci, not concentration in one locus.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The information is distributed across multiple instances of the selected locus type.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires distribution across multiple people.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The information is distributed across people.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires distribution across multiple instruments.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The information is distributed across instruments.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires distribution across multiple locations.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The information is distributed across locations.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires distribution across multiple roles.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The information is distributed across roles.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires distribution across multiple time windows.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The information is distributed across time windows.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Available information is distributed across multiple instances of one listed kind of locus.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "available information is distributed across plural loci", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P088-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Situation awareness can be supported by one integrated sensor and need not distribute information across actors or locations.", "slug": "situation_awareness"}], "residual_id": "r:perception_comprehension_projection_loop_design:b047_a13_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b047_a13_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Available information is distributed across people, instruments, locations, roles, or time windows. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Available information is distributed across people, instruments, locations, roles, or time windows."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "If every participant or role already held the complete incident information, the engineered shared picture would not be needed to synthesize partial views and the DSA mechanism would fail.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Common-Operating-Picture Breakdown", "one_liner": "The failure mode where a multi-party response acts incoherently because its engineered shared picture fails to synthesise participants' partial views — relocating the fault from the responders to the artefact, whose currency, completeness, and consistency become the lever.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:common_operating_picture_breakdown", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "common_operating_picture_breakdown"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "common_operating_picture_breakdown", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P088-C15-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent reconciliation confirms the raw exact-record mapping under universal necessity. The people and roles branches are directly entailed by the candidate's distributed partial-view precondition."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Relevant information is distributed across people, instruments, places, roles, or times.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Perceived cues can have clear comprehension and need not be contested.", "slug": "situation_awareness"}], "residual_id": "r:perception_comprehension_projection_loop_design:b047_a13_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b047_a13_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Raw observations exist but their operational meaning is ambiguous or contested. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Raw observations exist but their operational meaning is ambiguous or contested."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Perceived cues can have clear comprehension and need not be contested.", "slug": "situation_awareness"}], "normalized_requirement": "Raw observations have ambiguous or contested operational meaning.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Raw observations have ambiguous or contested operational meaning.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Projection of near-future status is the third mandatory level beyond perception and comprehension.", "role_mapping": "Trajectory -> projection; snapshot -> current-state comprehension.", "slug": "situation_awareness", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b047_a13_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Near-future trajectory matters more than a static current-state snapshot. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Near-future trajectory matters more than a static current-state snapshot."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Situation Awareness", "one_liner": "Acting on a system that keeps moving requires three distinct cognitive products — perceiving current elements, comprehending their meaning, and projecting their near-future trajectory.", "page_ref": "prime:situation_awareness", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Trajectory -> projection; snapshot -> current-state comprehension.", "slug": "situation_awareness", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Projection of near-future status is the third mandatory level beyond perception and comprehension."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Near-future trajectory matters more than a static snapshot.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P089-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a fact-rich presentation rather than an absence of factual content.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The selected presentation form shows many facts.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve omission of the facts' actionable implication.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The presentation does not state what those facts imply for action.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must connect the missing comprehension to action, not only to general explanation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The omitted implication concerns action based on the presented facts.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a status display to present facts without their action implication.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The presentation form is a status display.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a report to present facts without their action implication.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The presentation form is a report.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a briefing to present facts without their action implication.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The presentation form is a briefing.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A status display, report, or briefing presents many facts but does not state what those facts imply for action.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "fact-rich presentation lacks implications for action", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P089-C01-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid awareness state includes comprehension and can be directly actionable.", "slug": "situation_awareness"}], "residual_id": "r:perception_comprehension_projection_loop_design:b047_a13_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b047_a13_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Status displays, reports, or briefings show many facts but do not say what those facts imply for action. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Status displays, reports, or briefings show many facts but do not say what those facts imply for action."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid awareness state includes comprehension and can be directly actionable.", "slug": "situation_awareness"}], "normalized_requirement": "Reports present facts without their implication for action.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Reports present facts without their implication for action.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An awareness loop can promptly update plans and need not preserve stale expectations.", "slug": "situation_awareness"}], "residual_id": "r:perception_comprehension_projection_loop_design:b047_a13_c7", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b047_a13_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Prior plans or expectations are likely to remain active after the situation has changed. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Prior plans or expectations are likely to remain active after the situation has changed."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An awareness loop can promptly update plans and need not preserve stale expectations.", "slug": "situation_awareness"}], "normalized_requirement": "A prior plan or expectation remains active after the situation changes.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A prior plan or expectation remains active after the situation changes.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P089-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a critical cue as the affected information object.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A cue carrying critical situation information is available before or during a transition.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve possible expiry rather than guaranteed persistence or certain expiry.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The critical cue can expire.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the selected transition as a context in which cue expiry can occur, without requiring actual expiry.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The critical cue can expire during the selected transition context.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires cue expiry during a shift change.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The transition is a shift change.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires cue expiry during an incident escalation.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The transition is an incident escalation.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires cue expiry during rapid context switching.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The transition is rapid context switching.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A critical cue can expire during a shift change, incident escalation, or rapid context switch.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "critical cue expires during transition", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P089-C02-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P089-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a critical cue as the affected information object.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A cue carrying critical situation information is available before or during a transition.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve possible non-detection of the cue.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The critical cue can be missed by the relevant actor.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the selected transition as a context in which cue non-detection can occur, without requiring that the cue is actually missed.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The critical cue can be missed during the selected transition context.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires the cue to be missed during a shift change.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The transition is a shift change.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires the cue to be missed during an incident escalation.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The transition is an incident escalation.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires the cue to be missed during rapid context switching.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The transition is rapid context switching.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A critical cue can be missed during a shift change, incident escalation, or rapid context switch.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "critical cue is missed during transition", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P089-C02-U2"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P089-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a critical cue as the affected information object.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A cue carrying critical situation information is available before or during a transition.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve possible misinterpretation rather than simple non-detection.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The critical cue can be misunderstood by the relevant actor.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the selected transition as a context in which cue misinterpretation can occur, without requiring actual misunderstanding.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The critical cue can be misunderstood during the selected transition context.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires the cue to be misunderstood during a shift change.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The transition is a shift change.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires the cue to be misunderstood during an incident escalation.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The transition is an incident escalation.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires the cue to be misunderstood during rapid context switching.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The transition is rapid context switching.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A critical cue can be misunderstood during a shift change, incident escalation, or rapid context switch.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "critical cue is misunderstood during transition", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P089-C02-U3"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid awareness loop can preserve every cue through a stable operating interval.", "slug": "situation_awareness"}], "residual_id": "r:perception_comprehension_projection_loop_design:b047_a13_c8", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b047_a13_c8", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Critical cues can expire, be missed, or be misunderstood during shift changes, incident escalation, or rapid context switching. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Critical cues can expire, be missed, or be misunderstood during shift changes, incident escalation, or rapid context switching."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PARTIALLY_DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_SYNTHESIS", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A handoff can occur at a contractor or phase boundary instead of a shift change; that is exactly the single branch variation fixed by the guard.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Handoff Loss", "one_liner": "Locate post-transition failures at the transfer relation itself: work crossing a boundary between actors arrives degraded because a bounded artifact cannot carry the sender's tacit state, so downstream decisions run on an impoverished reconstruction.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:handoff_loss", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O4"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "handoff_boundary_is_shift_change", "predicate": "the candidate's boundary event is a shift change", "rationale": "The complete exact DSA plus the single emitted qualifier, if any, necessarily satisfies the selected DNF branch without role, direction, or qualifier laundering."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "handoff_loss"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "the candidate's boundary event is a shift change"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "handoff_loss", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P089-C02-U2", "why_it_fits": "Independent reconciliation confirms the exact-record DNF mapping. Restricting the candidate's named boundary event to its shift-change branch completes the source DNF without adding a new loss mechanism."}], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 3, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 1, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 2}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid awareness loop can preserve every cue through a stable operating interval.", "slug": "situation_awareness"}], "normalized_requirement": "Critical cues expire, are missed, or are misunderstood during handoff or context switching.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "PARTIAL_EXISTING_DSA_GROUNDING", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation grounded 1 of 3 eligible atomic units; the remaining unit or units stayed open."}, "predicate": "Critical cues expire, are missed, or are misunderstood during handoff or context switching.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [8], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Actors must coordinate under time pressure, risk, uncertainty, or partial observability.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Actors must coordinate under time pressure, risk, uncertainty, or partial observability. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Actors must coordinate under time pressure, risk, uncertainty, or partial observability."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Actors must coordinate under time pressure, risk, uncertainty, or partial observability."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 47, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-047", "ledger_sha256": "dfc910a776885a409b8e5e54a132c12dd9bae04f51da4883574a04ca9a95f696"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Perceptual Texture Modulation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:perceptual_texture_modulation", "slug": "perceptual_texture_modulation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 2 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 2}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Gross form and layout are adequate, but the surface still reads as flat, sterile, visually noisy, falsely tactile, affectively inappropriate, or disconnected from the desired experience. Texture choices accumulate as finish, filter, or ornament without declared targets, controlled parameters, comparative studies, contextual tests, or a stop rule.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Gross form and layout are adequate, but the surface still reads as flat, sterile, visually noisy, falsely tactile, affectively inappropriate, or disconnected from the desired experience. Texture choices accumulate as finish, filter, or ornament without declared targets, controlled parameters, comparative studies, contextual tests, or a stop rule."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record defines fine-grained surface variation whose grain, relief, density, direction, and regularity change perceptual character while gross form remains.", "role_mapping": "Gross form -> carrier surface; parameters -> texture dimensions; reading -> perceptual effect.", "slug": "texture", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b047_a14_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The same gross form produces different readings under different grain, relief, density, direction, or regularity. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The same gross form produces different readings under different grain, relief, density, direction, or regularity."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Texture", "one_liner": "The fine-grained surface variation beneath an object's gross form that carries perceptual, material, and emotional information rather than mere decoration.", "page_ref": "prime:texture", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Gross form -> carrier surface; parameters -> texture dimensions; reading -> perceptual effect.", "slug": "texture", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record defines fine-grained surface variation whose grain, relief, density, direction, and regularity change perceptual character while gross form remains."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The same gross form is perceived differently when grain, relief, density, direction, or regularity changes.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Texture can be uniformly regular or richly varied without either failure.", "slug": "texture"}], "residual_id": "r:perceptual_texture_modulation:b047_a14_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b047_a14_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Uniform finish erases useful local variation while uncontrolled variation competes with form and content. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Uniform finish erases useful local variation while uncontrolled variation competes with form and content."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Texture can be uniformly regular or richly varied without either failure.", "slug": "texture"}], "normalized_requirement": "Uniform finish erases useful variation while uncontrolled variation competes with form and content.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Uniform finish erases useful variation while uncontrolled variation competes with form and content.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Fine-grained variation should change depth, softness, age, calm, energy, intimacy, resistance, or sensory richness.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: Fine-grained variation should change depth, softness, age, calm, energy, intimacy, resistance, or sensory richness. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Fine-grained variation should change depth, softness, age, calm, energy, intimacy, resistance, or sensory richness."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "Fine-grained variation should change depth, softness, age, calm, energy, intimacy, resistance, or sensory richness."}, {"display_text": "A visual texture predicts a tactile quality that must be intentionally confirmed or contradicted.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: A visual texture predicts a tactile quality that must be intentionally confirmed or contradicted. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A visual texture predicts a tactile quality that must be intentionally confirmed or contradicted."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "A visual texture predicts a tactile quality that must be intentionally confirmed or contradicted."}, {"display_text": "A surface must retain character across lighting, distance, scale, reproduction, and wear.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this deployment constraint: A surface must retain character across lighting, distance, scale, reproduction, and wear. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A surface must retain character across lighting, distance, scale, reproduction, and wear."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "A surface must retain character across lighting, distance, scale, reproduction, and wear."}, {"display_text": "Designers need a reviewable vocabulary for comparing surface character rather than selecting one arbitrary swatch.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: Designers need a reviewable vocabulary for comparing surface character rather than selecting one arbitrary swatch. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Designers need a reviewable vocabulary for comparing surface character rather than selecting one arbitrary swatch."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Designers need a reviewable vocabulary for comparing surface character rather than selecting one arbitrary swatch."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 47, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-047", "ledger_sha256": "dfc910a776885a409b8e5e54a132c12dd9bae04f51da4883574a04ca9a95f696"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Periodic Review and Reset", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:periodic_review_and_reset", "slug": "periodic_review_and_reset"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 2 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 2}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is compounding drift under intermittent attention. The system gradually moves away from its intended state, but the movement is too slow, distributed, or quiet to trigger immediate correction. By the time the drift becomes visible, correction is more expensive: an account no longer reconciles, a policy no longer fits practice, a model threshold no longer predicts well, a team norm has eroded, or equipment has deteriorated beyond routine adjustment.\n\nThis problem often hides inside normal operation. Each small exception seems reasonable. Each stale record is manageable. Each skipped check is defensible. The danger comes from accumulation: the end of one operating interval becomes the starting condition for the next, so uncorrected drift compounds.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system gradually drifts from intended state, but continuous monitoring or correction is impractical, so accumulated error remains invisible or normalized until it becomes expensive failure."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires many individually small losses to accumulate into material degradation before a threshold is noticed.", "role_mapping": "Small deviations -> incremental losses; accumulation -> deterioration path.", "slug": "gradual_deterioration", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b047_a15_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Small deviations accumulate between interventions. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Small deviations accumulate between interventions"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Gradual Deterioration", "one_liner": "The incremental, often invisible decay of a system as sub-threshold stressors accumulate damage until capacity collapses, posing greater risk precisely because the slow progression is easy to overlook.", "page_ref": "prime:gradual_deterioration", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Small deviations -> incremental losses; accumulation -> deterioration path.", "slug": "gradual_deterioration", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires many individually small losses to accumulate into material degradation before a threshold is noticed."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Small losses or deviations accumulate gradually between interventions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A cadence can be chosen even when continuous control is feasible.", "slug": "cadence"}], "residual_id": "r:periodic_review_and_reset:b047_a15_c2", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b047_a15_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when a system needs recurring correction but does not justify or tolerate continuous control. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Continuous correction is impractical or excessive.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Continuous correction is impractical or excessive", "Use this archetype when a system needs recurring correction but does not justify or tolerate continuous control."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A cadence can be chosen even when continuous control is feasible.", "slug": "cadence"}], "normalized_requirement": "Continuous correction is impractical or excessive.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Continuous correction is impractical or excessive.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The intended state is known enough to compare against.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The system gradually moves away from its intended state, but the movement is too slow, distributed, or quiet to trigger immediate correction. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: The intended state is known enough to compare against. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The intended state is known enough to compare against", "The system gradually moves away from its intended state, but the movement is too slow, distributed, or quiet to trigger immediate correction."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "The intended state is known enough to compare against"}, {"display_text": "The system can be reset without rebuilding from scratch.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: The system can be reset without rebuilding from scratch. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The system can be reset without rebuilding from scratch"]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The system can be reset without rebuilding from scratch"}, {"display_text": "Review has enough authority to change the system.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: Review has enough authority to change the system. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Review has enough authority to change the system"]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Review has enough authority to change the system"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 47, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-047", "ledger_sha256": "dfc910a776885a409b8e5e54a132c12dd9bae04f51da4883574a04ca9a95f696"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Periodization Frame Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:periodization_frame_design", "slug": "periodization_frame_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is that time is continuous while interpretation often needs discrete segments. Without explicit periodization, people either face an overwhelming stream of events or inherit period labels that quietly determine the story.\n\nBad periodization can make gradual change look abrupt, make ruptures look like continuity, assign blame to the wrong phase, or imply that later outcomes were inevitable. A label like “founder era,” “crisis period,” “modernization phase,” or “decline stage” can carry a whole theory of causation before anyone has examined the evidence.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A sequence is treated as an undifferentiated flow, or arbitrary period labels quietly organize interpretation without anyone checking why those boundaries were chosen."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid periodization already supplies labeled intervals, boundary rationale, coherence claims, and an analytical use; it does not entail their absence.", "slug": "periodization"}], "residual_id": "r:periodization_frame_design:b048_a01_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b048_a01_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A long process contains many events but no useful temporal structure for interpretation or decision-making. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A long process contains many events but no useful temporal structure for interpretation or decision-making."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid periodization already supplies labeled intervals, boundary rationale, coherence claims, and an analytical use; it does not entail their absence.", "slug": "periodization"}], "normalized_requirement": "A long event sequence lacks useful temporal structure for interpretation or decision.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A long event sequence lacks useful temporal structure for interpretation or decision.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P089-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve distinct groups and a common historical object.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Multiple groups interpret the same history.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve divergence in the groups' period labels.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The groups apply different or incompatible phase labels to that history.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve divergence in historical interpretation or lessons.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The groups draw different lessons from the same history.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail that label divergence leads to lesson divergence, not merely that both coexist.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The different phase labels cause or organize the groups' different lessons.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Different groups apply different phase labels to the same history and therefore draw different lessons from it.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "different phase labels cause divergent lessons from shared history", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P089-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An extremely long timescale does not require multiple groups, incompatible labels, or divergent lessons.", "slug": "deep_time"}], "residual_id": "r:periodization_frame_design:b048_a01_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b048_a01_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Different groups are using different phase labels and therefore drawing different lessons from the same history. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Different groups are using different phase labels and therefore drawing different lessons from the same history."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An extremely long timescale does not require multiple groups, incompatible labels, or divergent lessons.", "slug": "deep_time"}], "normalized_requirement": "Different groups use incompatible phase labels and draw different lessons from the same history.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Different groups use incompatible phase labels and draw different lessons from the same history.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact prime requires an identified boundary-placement rule, coherence predicate, justification, and instrumental use, so a well-formed instance need not lack criteria.", "slug": "periodization"}], "residual_id": "r:periodization_frame_design:b048_a01_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b048_a01_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A conventional era, stage, or lifecycle label is shaping conclusions without explicit boundary criteria. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A conventional era, stage, or lifecycle label is shaping conclusions without explicit boundary criteria."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact prime requires an identified boundary-placement rule, coherence predicate, justification, and instrumental use, so a well-formed instance need not lack criteria.", "slug": "periodization"}], "normalized_requirement": "A conventional era or lifecycle label shapes conclusions without explicit boundary criteria.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A conventional era or lifecycle label shapes conclusions without explicit boundary criteria.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Discretization can create a boundary artifact even when the evidence and bucket rule are explicit and thoroughly examined.", "slug": "discretization_induced_artifact"}], "residual_id": "r:periodization_frame_design:b048_a01_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b048_a01_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A turning point is being asserted but the evidence for why it separates periods is weak or unexamined. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A turning point is being asserted but the evidence for why it separates periods is weak or unexamined."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Discretization can create a boundary artifact even when the evidence and bucket rule are explicit and thoroughly examined.", "slug": "discretization_induced_artifact"}], "normalized_requirement": "A claimed turning point has weak or unexamined evidence for separating periods.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A claimed turning point has weak or unexamined evidence for separating periods.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A retrospective, investigation, or historical account needs to separate what was possible before, during, and after a transition.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: A retrospective, investigation, or historical account needs to separate what was possible before, during, and after a transition. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A retrospective, investigation, or historical account needs to separate what was possible before, during, and after a transition."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "A retrospective, investigation, or historical account needs to separate what was possible before, during, and after a transition."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 48, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-048", "ledger_sha256": "d8bfe806d1b487e6e5f37324637f30c8c1b270fb55d2ffb65e12a00fab7f5e2b"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Persistent Identifier Stewardship", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:persistent_identifier_stewardship", "slug": "persistent_identifier_stewardship"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Important entities are repeatedly renamed, moved, reformatted, versioned, merged, split, rehosted, or transferred between custodians, while external actors continue to need stable references to those entities. Direct addresses, informal names, local database keys, or current-location pointers decay when the surrounding system changes.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Important entities are repeatedly renamed, moved, reformatted, versioned, merged, split, rehosted, or transferred between custodians, while external actors continue to need stable references to those entities. Direct addresses, informal names, local database keys, or current-location pointers decay when the surrounding system changes."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record commits a stable token to resolve to the same scoped entity across changes in location, representation, custodian, or version.", "role_mapping": "External reference -> copied stable token; internal change -> resolver-updated substrate.", "slug": "persistent_identifier", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b048_a02_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Users, records, citations, workflows, or dependent systems need a stable target even when storage location, owner, format, or current version changes. In this condition set, the requirement is: External references must survive internal change.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["External references must survive internal change."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Persistent Identifier", "one_liner": "A designed token committed to keep resolving to its entity across changes in the entity's location, representation, custodian, or version, via a separately maintained resolver.", "page_ref": "prime:persistent_identifier", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "External reference -> copied stable token; internal change -> resolver-updated substrate.", "slug": "persistent_identifier", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record commits a stable token to resolve to the same scoped entity across changes in location, representation, custodian, or version."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "External references must survive internal change.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record separates scoped entity identity from every mutable representation and location.", "role_mapping": "Entity -> referenced entity; current representation -> resolver target.", "slug": "persistent_identifier", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b048_a02_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The same work, specimen, record, asset, person-role, dataset, or abstract entity may appear through multiple files, records, interfaces, or versions. In this condition set, the requirement is: The referenced entity has an identity more durable than any current representation.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The entity has an identity that is more durable than any current representation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Persistent Identifier", "one_liner": "A designed token committed to keep resolving to its entity across changes in the entity's location, representation, custodian, or version, via a separately maintained resolver.", "page_ref": "prime:persistent_identifier", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Entity -> referenced entity; current representation -> resolver target.", "slug": "persistent_identifier", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record separates scoped entity identity from every mutable representation and location."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The referenced entity has an identity more durable than any current representation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A persistent identifier can be maintained indefinitely by one stable custodian; custodian turnover is supported but not mandatory.", "slug": "persistent_identifier"}], "residual_id": "r:persistent_identifier_stewardship:b048_a02_c4", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b048_a02_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The design must survive migration, institutional handoff, vendor turnover, reorganization, or archival transfer. In this condition set, the requirement is: No single local custodian can be assumed permanent.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["No single local custodian can be assumed permanent."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A persistent identifier can be maintained indefinitely by one stable custodian; custodian turnover is supported but not mandatory.", "slug": "persistent_identifier"}], "normalized_requirement": "No single local custodian can be assumed permanent.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "No single local custodian can be assumed permanent.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The stable token must be opaque and not derived from mutable title, location, custodian, or representation.", "role_mapping": "Names and locations -> mutable properties; durable identity -> stable opaque token.", "slug": "persistent_identifier", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b048_a02_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Human-readable names may collide or change; locations may be operational conveniences rather than identity commitments. In this condition set, the requirement is: Names and locations are mutable or meaningful and therefore unsafe as durable identity.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Names and locations are too meaningful or mutable to serve as durable identity."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Persistent Identifier", "one_liner": "A designed token committed to keep resolving to its entity across changes in the entity's location, representation, custodian, or version, via a separately maintained resolver.", "page_ref": "prime:persistent_identifier", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Names and locations -> mutable properties; durable identity -> stable opaque token.", "slug": "persistent_identifier", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The stable token must be opaque and not derived from mutable title, location, custodian, or representation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Names and locations are mutable or meaningful and therefore unsafe as durable identity.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Breakage would harm traceability, accountability, reproducibility, or discovery.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A lost or ambiguous reference prevents later actors from checking provenance, retrieving evidence, applying rights, or continuing work. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Breakage would harm traceability, accountability, reproducibility, or discovery. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Breakage would harm traceability, accountability, reproducibility, or discovery.", "A lost or ambiguous reference prevents later actors from checking provenance, retrieving evidence, applying rights, or continuing work."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Breakage would harm traceability, accountability, reproducibility, or discovery."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 48, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-048", "ledger_sha256": "d8bfe806d1b487e6e5f37324637f30c8c1b270fb55d2ffb65e12a00fab7f5e2b"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Persistent Site Framing", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:persistent_site_framing", "slug": "persistent_site_framing"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Systems often conflate a position with its current occupant, owner, label, container, address, or function. When occupants turn over, move, split, merge, retire, or are superseded, records and decisions lose track of what remained stable: the site that could host occupants. This causes assignment confusion, broken histories, false continuity, vacancy blindness, capacity mismatches, and identity drift.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Systems often conflate a position with its current occupant, owner, label, container, address, or function. When occupants turn over, move, split, merge, retire, or are superseded, records and decisions lose track of what remained stable: the site that could host occupants. This causes assignment confusion, broken histories, false continuity, vacancy blindness, capacity mismatches, and identity drift."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires an addressable position whose identity survives occupant turnover and vacancy.", "role_mapping": "Host position -> site; changing occupant -> interchangeable occupant.", "slug": "potential_occupancy_region", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b048_a03_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The system needs to ask what is in a bed, room, shelf location, parcel, job position, habitat site, or software slot now and what occupied it before. In this condition set, the requirement is: A host position remains identifiable while occupants change.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A host position must remain identifiable while occupants change."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Site", "one_liner": "A persistent, addressable position whose identity is given by its capacity to host or contain entities, surviving the turnover of whatever occupies it.", "page_ref": "prime:potential_occupancy_region", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Host position -> site; changing occupant -> interchangeable occupant.", "slug": "potential_occupancy_region", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires an addressable position whose identity survives occupant turnover and vacancy."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A host position remains identifiable while occupants change.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires a hosting condition belonging to the site rather than to any occupant.", "role_mapping": "Site constraints -> hosting condition; occupant -> interchangeable payload.", "slug": "potential_occupancy_region", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b048_a03_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Capacity, boundaries, access, permissions, adjacency, environmental conditions, compatibility, or eligibility matter even when empty. In this condition set, the requirement is: The site has constraints or affordances independent of any occupant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The site has constraints or affordances independent of any occupant."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Site", "one_liner": "A persistent, addressable position whose identity is given by its capacity to host or contain entities, surviving the turnover of whatever occupies it.", "page_ref": "prime:potential_occupancy_region", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Site constraints -> hosting condition; occupant -> interchangeable payload.", "slug": "potential_occupancy_region", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires a hosting condition belonging to the site rather than to any occupant."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The site has constraints or affordances independent of any occupant.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The position exists independently when empty and persists as occupants enter and leave, making vacancy and turnover first-class states.", "role_mapping": "Vacancy -> independent existence; assignment/release -> occupancy changes.", "slug": "potential_occupancy_region", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b048_a03_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The site can be empty, reserved, occupied, overfilled, blocked, decommissioned, or awaiting a successor. In this condition set, the requirement is: Vacancy, assignment, release, and turnover are operationally meaningful site states.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Vacancy, assignment, release, and turnover are operationally meaningful states."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Site", "one_liner": "A persistent, addressable position whose identity is given by its capacity to host or contain entities, surviving the turnover of whatever occupies it.", "page_ref": "prime:potential_occupancy_region", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Vacancy -> independent existence; assignment/release -> occupancy changes.", "slug": "potential_occupancy_region", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The position exists independently when empty and persists as occupants enter and leave, making vacancy and turnover first-class states."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Vacancy, assignment, release, and turnover are operationally meaningful site states.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record asks whether a structured candidate admits conflict-free placement inside a constrained ambient target.", "role_mapping": "Occupant -> candidate structure; site -> constrained ambient target; fit -> admissible embedding.", "slug": "embeddability", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b048_a03_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The position must be matched to compatible occupants rather than treated as an interchangeable placeholder. In this condition set, the requirement is: Assignments depend on fit between an occupant and a constrained site.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Assignments depend on fit between occupant and site."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Embeddability", "one_liner": "Whether a structured substrate admits a conflict-free placement inside a constrained ambient target.", "page_ref": "prime:embeddability", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Occupant -> candidate structure; site -> constrained ambient target; fit -> admissible embedding.", "slug": "embeddability", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record asks whether a structured candidate admits conflict-free placement inside a constrained ambient target."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Assignments depend on fit between an occupant and a constrained site.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Historical occupancy matters for accountability, provenance, maintenance, ecological interpretation, or legal record.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A record must distinguish the site from a succession of entities associated with it. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Historical occupancy matters for accountability, provenance, maintenance, ecological interpretation, or legal record. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Historical occupancy matters for accountability, provenance, maintenance, ecological interpretation, or legal record.", "A record must distinguish the site from a succession of entities associated with it."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Historical occupancy matters for accountability, provenance, maintenance, ecological interpretation, or legal record."}, {"display_text": "Multiple actors need a shared addressable reference to the same host position.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Local descriptions such as “where the old machine was” or “the office Alice used” become unreliable after turnover. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: Multiple actors need a shared addressable reference to the same host position. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Multiple actors need a shared addressable reference to the same host position.", "Local descriptions such as “where the old machine was” or “the office Alice used” become unreliable after turnover."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Multiple actors need a shared addressable reference to the same host position."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 48, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-048", "ledger_sha256": "d8bfe806d1b487e6e5f37324637f30c8c1b270fb55d2ffb65e12a00fab7f5e2b"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Perspective Depth Projection Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:perspective_depth_projection_design", "slug": "perspective_depth_projection_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A surface has height and width but no literal recession. To depict a room, landscape, body,\nmachine, street, or imagined world, a maker must encode distance and orientation indirectly.\nConvergence, relative size, overlap, foreshortening, vertical placement, texture, focus, atmosphere,\nlight, and motion can all signal depth. If those signals are chosen independently, the result may\nappear plausible locally while failing as a spatial system.\n\nThe structural problem has two parts. The first is constructive: map a spatial model through a\ndeclared projection so objects share one coherent relation to the observer, frame, and scale. The\nsecond is critical: recognize that every projection centers or parameterizes a viewpoint, distorts\nsome properties, and hides some surfaces. A technically perfect hero image can still be a poor\ndecision artifact if it conceals an accessibility barrier, shadow impact, service zone, crowding\ncondition, or affected community.\n\nPerspective becomes especially fragile when reference material combines different focal lengths,\nwhen a scene is invented piecemeal, when a wide field is forced into rectilinear geometry, or when\nan expressive departure is applied without protecting anchors. The archetype makes those choices\ninspectable and revisable.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A spatial subject or imagined environment must be communicated through a surface or bounded view that lacks physical depth. Without an explicit viewpoint, projection rule, frame, scale, convergence structure, cue hierarchy, and validation method, objects float, recede inconsistently, intersect impossibly, change size without reason, or appear plausible while concealing critical relations. Conversely, rigid geometric construction can suppress embodied, cultural, expressive, or multi-view purposes and falsely present one viewpoint as complete."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record is the systematic depiction of three-dimensional spatial relationships, depth, and distance on a two-dimensional surface.", "role_mapping": "Two-dimensional work -> surface; location/distance/volume -> spatial depth.", "slug": "perspective", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b048_a04_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A two-dimensional work must communicate location, distance, volume, enclosure, or recession. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A two-dimensional work must communicate location, distance, volume, enclosure, or recession."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Perspective", "one_liner": "Representation of depth.", "page_ref": "prime:perspective", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Two-dimensional work -> surface; location/distance/volume -> spatial depth.", "slug": "perspective", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record is the systematic depiction of three-dimensional spatial relationships, depth, and distance on a two-dimensional surface."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A two-dimensional work must communicate location, distance, volume, enclosure, or recession.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires coherent proportional scale, overlap, occlusion, and depth ordering from a declared viewpoint.", "role_mapping": "Objects -> depicted forms; foreground/distance -> depth order.", "slug": "perspective", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b048_a04_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Multiple objects need consistent scale and occlusion across foreground, middle ground, and distance. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Multiple objects need consistent scale and occlusion across foreground, middle ground, and distance."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Perspective", "one_liner": "Representation of depth.", "page_ref": "prime:perspective", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Objects -> depicted forms; foreground/distance -> depth order.", "slug": "perspective", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires coherent proportional scale, overlap, occlusion, and depth ordering from a declared viewpoint."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Multiple objects require consistent scale and occlusion across foreground, middle ground, and distance.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Perspective includes linear, multi-point, isometric, and orthographic systems; an instance need not depart from linear perspective.", "slug": "perspective"}], "residual_id": "r:perspective_depth_projection_design:b048_a04_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b048_a04_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: An image intentionally departs from linear perspective and needs a coherent alternate rule. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["An image intentionally departs from linear perspective and needs a coherent alternate rule."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Perspective includes linear, multi-point, isometric, and orthographic systems; an instance need not depart from linear perspective.", "slug": "perspective"}], "normalized_requirement": "An image departs from linear perspective and therefore needs a coherent alternate spatial rule.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "An image departs from linear perspective and therefore needs a coherent alternate spatial rule.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Architecture or engineering intent must be checked from a viewer or camera position.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: Architecture or engineering intent must be checked from a viewer or camera position. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Architecture or engineering intent must be checked from a viewer or camera position."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "Architecture or engineering intent must be checked from a viewer or camera position."}, {"display_text": "A visual narrative depends on height, distance, dominance, approach, or spatial reveal.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: A visual narrative depends on height, distance, dominance, approach, or spatial reveal. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A visual narrative depends on height, distance, dominance, approach, or spatial reveal."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "A visual narrative depends on height, distance, dominance, approach, or spatial reveal."}, {"display_text": "A technical view must permit measurement or reconstruction within a stated tolerance.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this deployment constraint: A technical view must permit measurement or reconstruction within a stated tolerance. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A technical view must permit measurement or reconstruction within a stated tolerance."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "A technical view must permit measurement or reconstruction within a stated tolerance."}, {"display_text": "A fixed viewpoint risks hiding access, safety, power, or environmental consequences.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: A fixed viewpoint risks hiding access, safety, power, or environmental consequences. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A fixed viewpoint risks hiding access, safety, power, or environmental consequences."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "A fixed viewpoint risks hiding access, safety, power, or environmental consequences."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 48, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-048", "ledger_sha256": "d8bfe806d1b487e6e5f37324637f30c8c1b270fb55d2ffb65e12a00fab7f5e2b"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": [{"groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A complete instance lacking the tested branch was attempted, but the cited exact structural signature makes all branch obligations necessary.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Positionality", "one_liner": "Treat a knowledge claim as constitutively shaped by the knower's social and institutional location, and declare that standpoint up front so readers can grant partial credit — strong where access opened, silent where it was foreclosed.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:positionality", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "positionality"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "positionality", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P089-C04-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent reconciliation confirms the exact-record DNF mapping. The exact record entails one complete DNF branch without adding a contingent fact or interpretive bridge."}], "publication_role": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT_ONLY", "source_residual_occurrence_id": "r:perspective_depth_projection_design:b048_a04_c7", "unit": {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P089-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a fixed viewpoint as the information-limiting frame.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A subject or environment is represented from a fixed viewpoint.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve risk or possibility of concealment, not assert inevitable concealment.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The fixed viewpoint creates a risk of hiding the selected consequence.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires risk of hiding access consequences.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The hidden consequence concerns access.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires risk of hiding safety consequences.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The hidden consequence concerns safety.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires risk of hiding power consequences.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The hidden consequence concerns power.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires risk of hiding environmental consequences.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The hidden consequence concerns the environment.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A fixed viewpoint risks hiding one listed kind of consequential relation.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "fixed viewpoint risks hiding consequential relations", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P089-C04-U1"}}]}
{"archetype": {"name": "Perturbation Testing", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:perturbation_testing", "slug": "perturbation_testing"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 3 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is apparent stability under untested variation. The system has not been asked how it responds when a condition shifts, a dependency degrades, a key assumption changes, a behavioral prompt moves, a load increases, or a failure occurs. Because the response is unknown, planners may overestimate robustness, underestimate coupling, or miss thresholds.\n\nThis creates a dangerous knowledge gap: the organization may believe it understands the system because it has seen normal operation, when the relevant evidence would only appear under disturbance. Perturbation testing converts that latent uncertainty into observable response.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "The system appears stable, but its sensitivity to small changes, boundary conditions, failures, assumptions, or local disturbances is unknown."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A stable system has known restoring dynamics after perturbation and need not have uncertain response under ordinary conditions.", "slug": "stability"}], "residual_id": "r:perturbation_testing:b048_a05_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b048_a05_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The system, model, process, prototype, or population performs acceptably under ordinary conditions, but its response to variation is uncertain. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The system, model, process, prototype, or population performs acceptably under ordinary conditions, but its response to variation is uncertain."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A stable system has known restoring dynamics after perturbation and need not have uncertain response under ordinary conditions.", "slug": "stability"}], "normalized_requirement": "Ordinary performance is acceptable while response to variation remains uncertain.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Ordinary performance is acceptable while response to variation remains uncertain.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record defines a small departure from a baseline whose propagation is analyzed to reveal sensitivity, stability, and response structure.", "role_mapping": "Small disturbance -> perturbation; hidden response -> propagation and stability probe.", "slug": "perturbation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b048_a05_c2a", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A small disturbance could plausibly reveal a hidden dependency, nonlinear threshold, brittleness, recovery gap, or false assumption. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A small disturbance could plausibly reveal a hidden dependency, nonlinear threshold, brittleness, recovery gap, or false assumption."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Perturbation", "one_liner": "Small disturbance.", "page_ref": "prime:perturbation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Small disturbance -> perturbation; hidden response -> propagation and stability probe.", "slug": "perturbation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record defines a small departure from a baseline whose propagation is analyzed to reveal sensitivity, stability, and response structure."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A small departure from a reference state can expose system sensitivity, stability, or response structure.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A perturbation can confirm a smooth, well-understood linear response and need not reveal any adverse latent property.", "slug": "perturbation"}], "residual_id": "r:perturbation_testing:b048_a05_c2b", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b048_a05_c2b", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A small disturbance could plausibly reveal a hidden dependency, nonlinear threshold, brittleness, recovery gap, or false assumption. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A small disturbance could plausibly reveal a hidden dependency, nonlinear threshold, brittleness, recovery gap, or false assumption."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A perturbation can confirm a smooth, well-understood linear response and need not reveal any adverse latent property.", "slug": "perturbation"}], "normalized_requirement": "The response may reveal a hidden dependency, nonlinear threshold, brittleness, recovery gap, or false assumption.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The response may reveal a hidden dependency, nonlinear threshold, brittleness, recovery gap, or false assumption.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Waiting for an uncontrolled disturbance would be more expensive, harmful, confusing, or politically costly than running a bounded diagnostic disturbance now.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "If the disturbance cannot be bounded or reversed, the safer choice is usually analysis, simulation, staged rehearsal, or risk avoidance rather than live perturbation. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: Waiting for an uncontrolled disturbance would be more expensive, harmful, confusing, or politically costly than running a bounded diagnostic disturbance now. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Waiting for an uncontrolled disturbance would be more expensive, harmful, confusing, or politically costly than running a bounded diagnostic disturbance now.", "If the disturbance cannot be bounded or reversed, the safer choice is usually analysis, simulation, staged rehearsal, or risk avoidance rather than live perturbation."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Waiting for an uncontrolled disturbance would be more expensive, harmful, confusing, or politically costly than running a bounded diagnostic disturbance now."}, {"display_text": "The test can be scoped, observed, stopped, and reversed or repaired if it produces an unexpectedly strong response.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It should be used only when the perturbation can be scoped, observed, stopped, and learned from. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: The test can be scoped, observed, stopped, and reversed or repaired if it produces an unexpectedly strong response. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The test can be scoped, observed, stopped, and reversed or repaired if it produces an unexpectedly strong response.", "It should be used only when the perturbation can be scoped, observed, stopped, and learned from."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The test can be scoped, observed, stopped, and reversed or repaired if it produces an unexpectedly strong response."}, {"display_text": "The learning target is clear enough to connect a perturbation to a response observation and design update.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It should be used only when the perturbation can be scoped, observed, stopped, and learned from. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: The learning target is clear enough to connect a perturbation to a response observation and design update. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The learning target is clear enough to connect a perturbation to a response observation and design update.", "It should be used only when the perturbation can be scoped, observed, stopped, and learned from."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The learning target is clear enough to connect a perturbation to a response observation and design update."}, {"display_text": "Stakeholders can distinguish controlled learning from sabotage, manipulation, or reckless disruption.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this deployment constraint: Stakeholders can distinguish controlled learning from sabotage, manipulation, or reckless disruption. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders can distinguish controlled learning from sabotage, manipulation, or reckless disruption."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Stakeholders can distinguish controlled learning from sabotage, manipulation, or reckless disruption."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 48, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-048", "ledger_sha256": "d8bfe806d1b487e6e5f37324637f30c8c1b270fb55d2ffb65e12a00fab7f5e2b"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Perturbative Error Correction", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:perturbative_error_correction", "slug": "perturbative_error_correction"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A functioning system is drifting away from its intended state through small errors, wear, imbalance, stale parameters, or environmental change. The deviation is not yet severe enough to justify full reset, but ignoring it allows accumulated error to become structural failure.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A functioning system is drifting away from its intended state through small errors, wear, imbalance, stale parameters, or environmental change. The deviation is not yet severe enough to justify full reset, but ignoring it allows accumulated error to become structural failure."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires a named operating point or regime about which displacement and return are measured.", "role_mapping": "Reference state or setpoint -> operating point; acceptable envelope -> basin.", "slug": "stability", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b048_a06_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A system has a known reference state, target allocation, setpoint, service band, or acceptable operating envelope. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A system has a known reference state, target allocation, setpoint, service band, or acceptable operating envelope."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Stability", "one_liner": "A system's tendency to return toward an operating point after perturbation.", "page_ref": "prime:stability", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Reference state or setpoint -> operating point; acceptable envelope -> basin.", "slug": "stability", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires a named operating point or regime about which displacement and return are measured."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A system has a known reference state, setpoint, target allocation, service band, or operating envelope.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A perturbation has specifiable magnitude, but its system need not face catastrophic failure or provide early operational observability.", "slug": "perturbation"}], "residual_id": "r:perturbative_error_correction:b048_a06_c2", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b048_a06_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Deviation is measurable or at least observably inferable before catastrophic failure. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Deviation is measurable or at least observably inferable before catastrophic failure."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A perturbation has specifiable magnitude, but its system need not face catastrophic failure or provide early operational observability.", "slug": "perturbation"}], "normalized_requirement": "Deviation is measurable or observably inferable before catastrophic failure.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Deviation is measurable or observably inferable before catastrophic failure.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires a departure small enough that response is analyzed as a correction around the reference state rather than as a fresh problem.", "role_mapping": "Small intervention -> small departure; trajectory change -> response correction.", "slug": "perturbation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b048_a06_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Small interventions can alter the trajectory without requiring shutdown, replacement, or global redesign. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Small interventions can alter the trajectory without requiring shutdown, replacement, or global redesign."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Perturbation", "one_liner": "Small disturbance.", "page_ref": "prime:perturbation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Small intervention -> small departure; trajectory change -> response correction.", "slug": "perturbation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires a departure small enough that response is analyzed as a correction around the reference state rather than as a fresh problem."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A small change can alter the trajectory without requiring a fresh global problem formulation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A perturbation can decay immediately under stable dynamics and need not repeat or accumulate.", "slug": "perturbation"}], "residual_id": "r:perturbative_error_correction:b048_a06_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b048_a06_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Repeated minor deviations are likely to accumulate if left untreated. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Repeated minor deviations are likely to accumulate if left untreated."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A perturbation can decay immediately under stable dynamics and need not repeat or accumulate.", "slug": "perturbation"}], "normalized_requirement": "Repeated minor deviations are likely to accumulate if untreated.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Repeated minor deviations are likely to accumulate if untreated.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The cost or risk of full reset is high relative to the present deviation.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The deviation is not yet severe enough to justify full reset, but ignoring it allows accumulated error to become structural failure. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: The cost or risk of full reset is high relative to the present deviation. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The cost or risk of full reset is high relative to the present deviation.", "The deviation is not yet severe enough to justify full reset, but ignoring it allows accumulated error to become structural failure."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The cost or risk of full reset is high relative to the present deviation."}, {"display_text": "The effects of a corrective perturbation can be observed within a useful time horizon.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: The effects of a corrective perturbation can be observed within a useful time horizon. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The effects of a corrective perturbation can be observed within a useful time horizon."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The effects of a corrective perturbation can be observed within a useful time horizon."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 48, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-048", "ledger_sha256": "d8bfe806d1b487e6e5f37324637f30c8c1b270fb55d2ffb65e12a00fab7f5e2b"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Phase-Space Mapping", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:phase_space_mapping", "slug": "phase_space_mapping"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 5 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is that actors reason about a current state and desired endpoint without understanding the wider state landscape. They may assume the system can jump from here to there, or they may choose an intervention that works only in one region of the landscape. They may also miss dangerous trajectories because the current state still looks acceptable.\n\nThis problem appears in technical systems, projects, clinical pathways, cybersecurity, organizational change, markets, and public policy. In each case, the system is not just “good” or “bad.” It occupies a position in a structured space, and movement through that space is shaped by constraints, thresholds, timing, resources, feedback, and path dependence.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Actors reason only about the current state or desired endpoint without understanding the wider set of possible states and paths."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A problem space may contain candidate actions or solutions rather than states of one evolving system.", "slug": "problem_space"}], "residual_id": "r:phase_space_mapping:b048_a07_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b048_a07_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A system can occupy multiple states, modes, configurations, levels, health conditions, project conditions, or behavioral patterns. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A system can occupy multiple states, modes, configurations, levels, health conditions, project conditions, or behavioral patterns."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A problem space may contain candidate actions or solutions rather than states of one evolving system.", "slug": "problem_space"}], "normalized_requirement": "A system can occupy multiple states, modes, configurations, levels, health conditions, or behavioral patterns.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A system can occupy multiple states, modes, configurations, levels, health conditions, or behavioral patterns.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record represents temporal evolution as trajectories generated by a dynamical flow through the complete state space.", "role_mapping": "States -> phase-space points; constraints -> dynamical flow and invariants; movement -> trajectory.", "slug": "phase_space", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b048_a07_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Movement between states is constrained by capacity, timing, law, physics, resources, path dependence, thresholds, or social dynamics. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Movement between states is constrained by capacity, timing, law, physics, resources, path dependence, thresholds, or social dynamics."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Phase Space", "one_liner": "All possible system states.", "page_ref": "prime:phase_space", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "States -> phase-space points; constraints -> dynamical flow and invariants; movement -> trajectory.", "slug": "phase_space", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record represents temporal evolution as trajectories generated by a dynamical flow through the complete state space."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Movement between states is constrained by the system's dynamics, laws, resources, thresholds, or path dependence.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A phase-space model can specify every trajectory and need not include a desired endpoint or uncertainty.", "slug": "phase_space"}], "residual_id": "r:phase_space_mapping:b048_a07_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b048_a07_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A desired endpoint is known, but the available path, intermediate states, or transition risks are unclear. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A desired endpoint is known, but the available path, intermediate states, or transition risks are unclear."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A phase-space model can specify every trajectory and need not include a desired endpoint or uncertainty.", "slug": "phase_space"}], "normalized_requirement": "A desired endpoint is known while the path, intermediate states, or transition risks are unclear.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A desired endpoint is known while the path, intermediate states, or transition risks are unclear.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A fixed point can be desirable, freely escapable under intervention, and unrelated to danger or prohibition.", "slug": "fixed_point"}], "residual_id": "r:phase_space_mapping:b048_a07_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b048_a07_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Some states are stable, sticky, dangerous, forbidden, or hard to escape, and those regions affect intervention choice. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Some states are stable, sticky, dangerous, forbidden, or hard to escape, and those regions affect intervention choice."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A fixed point can be desirable, freely escapable under intervention, and unrelated to danger or prohibition.", "slug": "fixed_point"}], "normalized_requirement": "Stable, sticky, dangerous, forbidden, or hard-to-escape state regions affect intervention choice.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Stable, sticky, dangerous, forbidden, or hard-to-escape state regions affect intervention choice.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A phase-space trajectory can be nonrecurrent and completely specified, with no unwanted state or omitted variable.", "slug": "phase_space"}], "residual_id": "r:phase_space_mapping:b048_a07_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b048_a07_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The system repeatedly returns to an unwanted condition, suggesting hidden attractors or missing variables. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The system repeatedly returns to an unwanted condition, suggesting hidden attractors or missing variables."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A phase-space trajectory can be nonrecurrent and completely specified, with no unwanted state or omitted variable.", "slug": "phase_space"}], "normalized_requirement": "The system repeatedly returns to an unwanted condition, suggesting a hidden attractor or omitted variable.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The system repeatedly returns to an unwanted condition, suggesting a hidden attractor or omitted variable.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Decision makers need to compare paths, not merely compare end states or current metrics.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Actors reason only about the current state or desired endpoint without understanding the wider set of possible states and paths. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: Decision makers need to compare paths, not merely compare end states or current metrics. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Decision makers need to compare paths, not merely compare end states or current metrics.", "Actors reason only about the current state or desired endpoint without understanding the wider set of possible states and paths."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Decision makers need to compare paths, not merely compare end states or current metrics."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 48, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-048", "ledger_sha256": "d8bfe806d1b487e6e5f37324637f30c8c1b270fb55d2ffb65e12a00fab7f5e2b"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Phase-Specific Intervention", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:phase_specific_intervention", "slug": "phase_specific_intervention"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is phase mismatch. Actors apply one rule across a system whose behavior changes by phase. The result may be premature escalation, delayed support, stale emergency mode, advanced practices imposed before prerequisites exist, or late-stage maintenance applied during early experimentation.\n\nThe deeper tension is that systems need coordination and consistency, but phase-sensitive systems also need differentiated action. Too much uniformity produces wrong-phase interventions; too much differentiation produces complexity, unfairness, and fragmentation.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "An intervention effective in one phase is ineffective or harmful in another phase, but the system is being treated as if one uniform action applies across all phases."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record decomposes a hazard-bearing event into distinct pre-event, event, and post-event regimes.", "role_mapping": "System phases -> event regimes; lifecycle boundary -> recognizable onset and end.", "slug": "event_lifecycle_phases", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b048_a08_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The system has distinguishable phases, stages, regimes, maturity levels, lifecycle periods, disease stages, crisis phases, or developmental states. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The system has distinguishable phases, stages, regimes, maturity levels, lifecycle periods, disease stages, crisis phases, or developmental states."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Event Lifecycle Phases", "one_liner": "Decomposing a hazard-bearing event into pre-event, event, and post-event regimes and treating each phase, not the event, as the primary unit of intervention design.", "page_ref": "prime:event_lifecycle_phases", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "System phases -> event regimes; lifecycle boundary -> recognizable onset and end.", "slug": "event_lifecycle_phases", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record decomposes a hazard-bearing event into distinct pre-event, event, and post-event regimes."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The system has distinguishable lifecycle, hazard, crisis, disease, developmental, or maturity phases.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires phase-specific tempo, decision logic, intervention shape, success metric, and political economy.", "role_mapping": "Materially changing conditions -> regime-change at phase boundaries.", "slug": "event_lifecycle_phases", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b048_a08_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The causal conditions, risks, constraints, sensitivities, available levers, or stakeholder needs change materially by phase. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The causal conditions, risks, constraints, sensitivities, available levers, or stakeholder needs change materially by phase."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Event Lifecycle Phases", "one_liner": "Decomposing a hazard-bearing event into pre-event, event, and post-event regimes and treating each phase, not the event, as the primary unit of intervention design.", "page_ref": "prime:event_lifecycle_phases", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Materially changing conditions -> regime-change at phase boundaries.", "slug": "event_lifecycle_phases", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires phase-specific tempo, decision logic, intervention shape, success metric, and political economy."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Causal conditions, risks, constraints, sensitivities, levers, or stakeholder needs change materially by phase.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record states that the same event requires distinct intervention systems and that collapsing phases misallocates action.", "role_mapping": "Uniform intervention -> collapsed event treatment; phase-specific harm -> regime category error.", "slug": "event_lifecycle_phases", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b048_a08_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A uniform intervention would over-treat, under-treat, mistime, destabilize, confuse, or delegitimize the response. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A uniform intervention would over-treat, under-treat, mistime, destabilize, confuse, or delegitimize the response."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Event Lifecycle Phases", "one_liner": "Decomposing a hazard-bearing event into pre-event, event, and post-event regimes and treating each phase, not the event, as the primary unit of intervention design.", "page_ref": "prime:event_lifecycle_phases", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Uniform intervention -> collapsed event treatment; phase-specific harm -> regime category error.", "slug": "event_lifecycle_phases", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record states that the same event requires distinct intervention systems and that collapsing phases misallocates action."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "One uniform intervention would mistime, over-treat, under-treat, destabilize, or delegitimize at least one phase.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An event lifecycle can be observed well within one regime rather than near any boundary.", "slug": "event_lifecycle_phases"}], "residual_id": "r:phase_specific_intervention:b048_a08_c6", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b048_a08_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The system may be approaching a phase boundary where action rules need to change. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The system may be approaching a phase boundary where action rules need to change."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An event lifecycle can be observed well within one regime rather than near any boundary.", "slug": "event_lifecycle_phases"}], "normalized_requirement": "The system may be approaching a phase boundary where action rules must change.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The system may be approaching a phase boundary where action rules must change.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "There is enough observability to classify the current phase or at least reason about phase uncertainty.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It works best when the system can classify its current phase with enough confidence, monitor when that classification changes, and explain why different phases deserve different interventions. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: There is enough observability to classify the current phase or at least reason about phase uncertainty. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["There is enough observability to classify the current phase or at least reason about phase uncertainty.", "It works best when the system can classify its current phase with enough confidence, monitor when that classification changes, and explain why different phases deserve different interventions."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "There is enough observability to classify the current phase or at least reason about phase uncertainty."}, {"display_text": "Actors must decide what to do now, not only how to represent the phase diagram or state model.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Actors apply one rule across a system whose behavior changes by phase. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: Actors must decide what to do now, not only how to represent the phase diagram or state model. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Actors must decide what to do now, not only how to represent the phase diagram or state model.", "Actors apply one rule across a system whose behavior changes by phase."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Actors must decide what to do now, not only how to represent the phase diagram or state model."}, {"display_text": "The intervention needs to preserve continuity across phase transitions while changing enough to fit the new phase.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "An intervention effective in one phase is ineffective or harmful in another phase, but the system is being treated as if one uniform action applies across all phases. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: The intervention needs to preserve continuity across phase transitions while changing enough to fit the new phase. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The intervention needs to preserve continuity across phase transitions while changing enough to fit the new phase.", "An intervention effective in one phase is ineffective or harmful in another phase, but the system is being treated as if one uniform action applies across all phases."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "The intervention needs to preserve continuity across phase transitions while changing enough to fit the new phase."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 48, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-048", "ledger_sha256": "d8bfe806d1b487e6e5f37324637f30c8c1b270fb55d2ffb65e12a00fab7f5e2b"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Physical-Constraint Design for Impossibility", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:physical_constraint_design_for_impossibility", "slug": "physical_constraint_design_for_impossibility"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 3 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A recurring harmful action remains available in the action space, so prevention depends on vigilance, instruction, reminders, inspection, or after-the-fact correction rather than on the structure of the system itself.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A recurring harmful action remains available in the action space, so prevention depends on vigilance, instruction, reminders, inspection, or after-the-fact correction rather than on the structure of the system itself."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Error proofing can be installed prospectively for one high-consequence error mode before recurrence or training failure.", "slug": "error_proofing_poka_yoke"}], "residual_id": "r:physical_constraint_design_for_impossibility:b048_a09_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b048_a09_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The same wrong assembly, wrong connection, wrong sequence, wrong medication, wrong handoff, or wrong configuration recurs despite training. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The same wrong assembly, wrong connection, wrong sequence, wrong medication, wrong handoff, or wrong configuration recurs despite training."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Error proofing can be installed prospectively for one high-consequence error mode before recurrence or training failure.", "slug": "error_proofing_poka_yoke"}], "normalized_requirement": "The same wrong assembly, connection, sequence, medication, handoff, or configuration recurs despite training.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The same wrong assembly, connection, sequence, medication, handoff, or configuration recurs despite training.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P089-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve distinct correct and incorrect actions.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A correct action and a corresponding incorrect action are both available in the action space.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail physical similarity between the two actions.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The incorrect action is physically similar to the correct action.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "The incorrect action is physically similar to the correct action.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "incorrect action is physically similar to correct action", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P089-C05-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P089-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve distinct correct and incorrect actions.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A correct action and a corresponding incorrect action are both available in the action space.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail a relative ease advantage for the incorrect action.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The incorrect action requires less effort or is easier than the correct action.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "The incorrect action is easier to perform than the correct action.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "incorrect action is easier than correct action", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P089-C05-U2"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P089-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an interface and the incorrect action it exposes.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An interface mediates access to a known incorrect action.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve permissiveness rather than a physical block on the wrong action.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The interface is permissive with respect to the incorrect action.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail interface-caused availability of the incorrect action.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The permissive interface enables or makes physically available the incorrect action.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "A permissive interface enables the incorrect action, making it physically available.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "permissive interface enables incorrect action", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P089-C05-U3"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact prime describes the corrected design in which misuse is costly or impossible, not the permissive pre-intervention state.", "slug": "designed_out_misuse"}], "residual_id": "r:physical_constraint_design_for_impossibility:b048_a09_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b048_a09_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The incorrect action is physically similar to the correct action, easier than the correct action, or enabled by a permissive interface. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The incorrect action is physically similar to the correct action, easier than the correct action, or enabled by a permissive interface."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A complete mode error cannot remove the physically identical correct-versus-incorrect gesture because mode-relative interpretation of that gesture is the defining mechanism.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Mode Error", "one_liner": "The interaction failure in which the same user action is interpreted differently by a system depending on a hidden mode the user does not perceive — the user acts correctly for the mode they believe is active, and the system, in the actually active mode, does something else.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:mode_error", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "mode_error"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "mode_error", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P089-C05-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent reconciliation confirms the exact-record DNF mapping. The candidate directly entails both obligations, with stronger-than-similar physical identity."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A complete instance lacking the tested branch was attempted, but the cited exact structural signature makes all branch obligations necessary.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Touch-Target Miss", "one_liner": "Reclassify a mistyped tap from operator error to interface defect by reading the miss rate off the mismatch between a control's target geometry and the operator population's motor precision — a geometric scan Fitts's Law makes quantitative.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:touch_target_miss", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "touch_target_miss"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "touch_target_miss", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P089-C05-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent reconciliation confirms the exact-record DNF mapping. The exact record entails one complete DNF branch without adding a contingent fact or interpretive bridge."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A complete instance lacking the tested branch was attempted, but the cited exact structural signature makes all branch obligations necessary.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Confirmation Fatigue", "one_liner": "The interaction-design failure where a blocking confirmation prompt fires so often, and so rarely marks a truly consequential choice, that users develop an automatic dismiss reflex that discharges the prompt without reading it — leaving it syntactically present but informationally inert.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:confirmation_fatigue", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "confirmation_fatigue"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "confirmation_fatigue", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P089-C05-U2", "why_it_fits": "Independent reconciliation confirms the exact-record DNF mapping. The exact record entails one complete DNF branch without adding a contingent fact or interpretive bridge."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "If the fit-appropriate alternative were no harder to acquire than the fluent incumbent, the asymmetric-cost mechanism defining this anti-pattern would be absent.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Golden Hammer Anti-Pattern", "one_liner": "Diagnose a team applying its familiar technology to a poorly-fitting problem because the acquisition cost of an alternative is visible while the misfit cost is diffuse and downstream, so fluency reshapes what counts as the right tool before fit is ever asked.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:golden_hammer_anti_pattern", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "golden_hammer_anti_pattern"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "golden_hammer_anti_pattern", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P089-C05-U2", "why_it_fits": "Independent reconciliation confirms the exact-record DNF mapping. The candidate directly entails an easier familiar-but-wrong selection relative to the fit-appropriate action."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A complete mode error with no interface-enabled wrong-mode action is impossible because the system doing something else under the actual mode is the outcome signature.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Mode Error", "one_liner": "The interaction failure in which the same user action is interpreted differently by a system depending on a hidden mode the user does not perceive — the user acts correctly for the mode they believe is active, and the system, in the actually active mode, does something else.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:mode_error", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "mode_error"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "mode_error", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P089-C05-U3", "why_it_fits": "Independent reconciliation confirms the exact-record DNF mapping. The candidate directly entails a permissive interface enabling the incorrect action."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The incorrect action is physically similar to, easier than, or more available than the correct action.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A prevention-mode poka-yoke may be adopted without any downstream inspection or previously accumulated harm.", "slug": "error_proofing_poka_yoke"}], "residual_id": "r:physical_constraint_design_for_impossibility:b048_a09_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b048_a09_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Downstream inspection can detect the defect only after cost, delay, risk, or irreversible harm has already accumulated. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Downstream inspection can detect the defect only after cost, delay, risk, or irreversible harm has already accumulated."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A prevention-mode poka-yoke may be adopted without any downstream inspection or previously accumulated harm.", "slug": "error_proofing_poka_yoke"}], "normalized_requirement": "Downstream inspection finds the defect only after cost, delay, risk, or irreversible harm accumulates.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Downstream inspection finds the defect only after cost, delay, risk, or irreversible harm accumulates.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The task is performed under time pressure, fatigue, interruption, low visibility, high cognitive load, or handoff ambiguity.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The task is performed under time pressure, fatigue, interruption, low visibility, high cognitive load, or handoff ambiguity. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The task is performed under time pressure, fatigue, interruption, low visibility, high cognitive load, or handoff ambiguity."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "The task is performed under time pressure, fatigue, interruption, low visibility, high cognitive load, or handoff ambiguity."}, {"display_text": "The error class has a clear material, spatial, sequence, fit, access, or default-state signature that can be redesigned.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: The error class has a clear material, spatial, sequence, fit, access, or default-state signature that can be redesigned. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The error class has a clear material, spatial, sequence, fit, access, or default-state signature that can be redesigned."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The error class has a clear material, spatial, sequence, fit, access, or default-state signature that can be redesigned."}, {"display_text": "The target accepted prime is error_proofing_poka_yoke and direct accepted coverage is absent in the scaled queue.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this source condition requiring clarification: The target accepted prime is error_proofing_poka_yoke and direct accepted coverage is absent in the scaled queue. The wording is retained for source review rather than assigned a stronger semantic role.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The target accepted prime is error_proofing_poka_yoke and direct accepted coverage is absent in the scaled queue."]}, "function": "MALFORMED", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because the source wording is not structurally clear enough to support a formal trigger role without clarification.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The target accepted prime is error_proofing_poka_yoke and direct accepted coverage is absent in the scaled queue."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 48, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-048", "ledger_sha256": "d8bfe806d1b487e6e5f37324637f30c8c1b270fb55d2ffb65e12a00fab7f5e2b"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Pipeline Staging", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:pipeline_staging", "slug": "pipeline_staging"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 2, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is mixed transformation. A document, patient, product, request, data object, case, or decision must pass through several changes, but those changes are not clearly separated. Work may move from person to person without clear readiness criteria. Defects may be discovered downstream after the responsible context has disappeared. People may optimize their own local contribution without seeing the whole flow.\n\nThe result is a process that may look active but is not governable. Items are somewhere, but not in a known state. Someone is responsible, but not clearly. A next step exists, but its prerequisites are uncertain. Pipeline Staging addresses that by giving the flow a designed structure.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A flow of work, material, information, people, or decisions must pass through multiple transformations, but those transformations are mixed together, unordered, opaque, or handled informally, causing quality loss, rework, slow throughput, or accountability gaps."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Flow requires directional conserved transfer, not recurring transformations or separable responsibilities.", "slug": "flow"}], "residual_id": "r:pipeline_staging:b048_a10_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b048_a10_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A process contains recurring transformations that can be separated into meaningful responsibilities. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A process contains recurring transformations that can be separated into meaningful responsibilities."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Flow requires directional conserved transfer, not recurring transformations or separable responsibilities.", "slug": "flow"}], "normalized_requirement": "A process contains recurring transformations separable into meaningful responsibilities.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A process contains recurring transformations separable into meaningful responsibilities.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P089-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve differentiation among portions of one body of work.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The body of work has multiple distinct parts or portions.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail that requirements vary by work portion.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Different work portions require different instances of the selected requirement type.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires different work portions to need different skills.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The differentiated requirement is skill.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires different work portions to need different tools.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The differentiated requirement is tooling.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires different work portions to need different timing.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The differentiated requirement is timing.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires different work portions to need different evidence.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The differentiated requirement is evidence.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires different work portions to need different quality checks.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The differentiated requirement is a quality check.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Different parts of a body of work require different instances of one listed requirement type.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "different work parts require differentiated requirements", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P089-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A prescribed procedure can mismatch work even when one skill and check apply throughout.", "slug": "procedure_work_mismatch"}], "residual_id": "r:pipeline_staging:b048_a10_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b048_a10_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Different parts of the work require different skills, tools, timing, evidence, or quality checks. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Different parts of the work require different skills, tools, timing, evidence, or quality checks."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A complete medication-use pipeline with no differentiated stage checks would lack the layered-defence and conjunctive-escape structure that defines the candidate.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Medication Error", "one_liner": "Any preventable deviation in the medication-use pipeline that could expose a patient to unintended pharmacologic action, whether or not harm results — a defence-in-depth failure whose harm rate is the product of escape probabilities across every stage, so leverage lies in downstream catch rates, not upstream error counts.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:medication_error", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "medication_error"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "medication_error", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P089-C06-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent reconciliation confirms the exact-record DNF mapping. Every complete candidate instance entails the quality-check branch of the source DNF."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Different portions of work require different skills, tools, timing, evidence, or quality checks.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Postponement preserves an intermediate form to await information and need not lose context or accountability.", "slug": "postponement"}], "residual_id": "r:pipeline_staging:b048_a10_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b048_a10_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Current work moves through informal transitions where context or accountability is lost. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Current work moves through informal transitions where context or accountability is lost."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Postponement preserves an intermediate form to await information and need not lose context or accountability.", "slug": "postponement"}], "normalized_requirement": "Work moves through informal transitions where context or accountability is lost.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Work moves through informal transitions where context or accountability is lost.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A funnel can be fully observable and does not entail unlocatable items or unexplained delay.", "slug": "funnel_analysis"}], "residual_id": "r:pipeline_staging:b048_a10_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b048_a10_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Managers or participants cannot tell where items are, why they are delayed, or what state they are in. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Managers or participants cannot tell where items are, why they are delayed, or what state they are in."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A funnel can be fully observable and does not entail unlocatable items or unexplained delay.", "slug": "funnel_analysis"}], "normalized_requirement": "Participants cannot locate items, explain delays, or identify their current state.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Participants cannot locate items, explain delays, or identify their current state.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P089-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve continuity of state across plural loci.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "State must persist across multiple instances of the selected handoff locus.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail that state continuity is necessary for end-to-end quality.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "End-to-end quality depends on that cross-locus state preservation.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires state continuity across people.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "State is preserved across multiple people.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires state continuity across tools.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "State is preserved across multiple tools.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires state continuity across organizational units.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "State is preserved across multiple organizational units.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "End-to-end quality depends on preserving state across multiple instances of one listed handoff locus.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "end-to-end quality depends on cross-locus state preservation", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P089-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A continuous physical flow may cross no people, tools, or organizational units and may tolerate local loss.", "slug": "flow"}], "residual_id": "r:pipeline_staging:b048_a10_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b048_a10_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A flow of work, material, information, people, or decisions must pass through multiple transformations, but those transformations are mixed together, unordered, opaque, or handled informally, causing quality loss, rework, slow throughput, or accountability gaps. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: End-to-end quality depends on preserving state across multiple people, tools, or organizational units.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["End-to-end quality depends on preserving state across multiple people, tools, or organizational units.", "A flow of work, material, information, people, or decisions must pass through multiple transformations, but those transformations are mixed together, unordered, opaque, or handled informally, causing quality loss, rework, slow throughput, or accountability gaps."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A complete instance lacking the tested branch was attempted, but the cited exact structural signature makes all branch obligations necessary.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Handoff Loss", "one_liner": "Locate post-transition failures at the transfer relation itself: work crossing a boundary between actors arrives degraded because a bounded artifact cannot carry the sender's tacit state, so downstream decisions run on an impoverished reconstruction.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:handoff_loss", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "handoff_loss"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "handoff_loss", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P089-C07-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent reconciliation confirms the exact-record DNF mapping. The exact record entails one complete DNF branch without adding a contingent fact or interpretive bridge."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "End-to-end quality depends on preserving state across multiple people, tools, or organizational units.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 48, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-048", "ledger_sha256": "d8bfe806d1b487e6e5f37324637f30c8c1b270fb55d2ffb65e12a00fab7f5e2b"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Pivotal Participation Leverage Mapping", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:pivotal_participation_leverage_mapping", "slug": "pivotal_participation_leverage_mapping"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 5, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A collective outcome depends on multiple participants, votes, capabilities, jurisdictions, resources, or permissions. Formal shares, headcounts, titles, or broad stakeholder labels hide the fact that some units sit exactly at the margin where their inclusion, refusal, absence, or shift changes whether the outcome can occur. Without a pivotality map, planners may under-engage decisive actors, overpay nondecisive ones, mistake formal authority for real leverage, let holdouts exploit hidden necessity, or design unfair processes that ignore marginal contribution and vulnerability.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A collective outcome depends on multiple participants, votes, capabilities, jurisdictions, resources, or permissions. Formal shares, headcounts, titles, or broad stakeholder labels hide the fact that some units sit exactly at the margin where their inclusion, refusal, absence, or shift changes whether the outcome can occur. Without a pivotality map, planners may under-engage decisive actors, overpay nondecisive ones, mistake formal authority for real leverage, let holdouts exploit hidden necessity, or design unfair processes that ignore marginal contribution and vulnerability."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires a collective outcome and a rule defining when joint participation realizes it.", "role_mapping": "Voting or dependency rule -> collective-outcome rule; result -> collective outcome.", "slug": "pivotality", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b048_a11_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A collective outcome is defined by a voting, quorum, consent, aggregation, production, coalition, or dependency rule. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A collective outcome is defined by a voting, quorum, consent, aggregation, production, coalition, or dependency rule."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Pivotality", "one_liner": "An element whose participation is necessary for a collective outcome owns the marginal contribution and acquires leverage beyond its nominal share.", "page_ref": "prime:pivotality", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Voting or dependency rule -> collective-outcome rule; result -> collective outcome.", "slug": "pivotality", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires a collective outcome and a rule defining when joint participation realizes it."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A voting, quorum, consent, aggregation, production, coalition, or dependency rule defines a collective outcome.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The defining counterfactual test asks whether removal flips the outcome from occurs to does not occur.", "role_mapping": "Pass/fail boundary -> outcome flip under removal.", "slug": "pivotality", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b048_a11_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The outcome has a pass/fail, feasible/infeasible, activated/inactive, or materially changed boundary. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The outcome has a pass/fail, feasible/infeasible, activated/inactive, or materially changed boundary."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Pivotality", "one_liner": "An element whose participation is necessary for a collective outcome owns the marginal contribution and acquires leverage beyond its nominal share.", "page_ref": "prime:pivotality", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Pass/fail boundary -> outcome flip under removal.", "slug": "pivotality", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The defining counterfactual test asks whether removal flips the outcome from occurs to does not occur."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The outcome has a pass/fail, feasible/infeasible, activated/inactive, or materially changed boundary.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Pivotality can arise under an additive weighted-majority rule without complementary contribution types.", "slug": "pivotality"}], "residual_id": "r:pivotal_participation_leverage_mapping:b048_a11_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b048_a11_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Some participants or contributions are complementary rather than merely additive. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Some participants or contributions are complementary rather than merely additive."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Pivotality can arise under an additive weighted-majority rule without complementary contribution types.", "slug": "pivotality"}], "normalized_requirement": "Some contributions are complementary rather than merely additive.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Some contributions are complementary rather than merely additive.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "An element is pivotal exactly when its removal changes the collective outcome, establishing current non-substitutability under the rule.", "role_mapping": "Hard-to-substitute unit -> pivotal candidate; current rule -> collective-outcome rule.", "slug": "pivotality", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b048_a11_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: At least one participant, bloc, resource, capability, permission, or jurisdiction may be hard to substitute. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["At least one participant, bloc, resource, capability, permission, or jurisdiction may be hard to substitute."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Pivotality", "one_liner": "An element whose participation is necessary for a collective outcome owns the marginal contribution and acquires leverage beyond its nominal share.", "page_ref": "prime:pivotality", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Hard-to-substitute unit -> pivotal candidate; current rule -> collective-outcome rule.", "slug": "pivotality", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "An element is pivotal exactly when its removal changes the collective outcome, establishing current non-substitutability under the rule."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "At least one participant, resource, capability, permission, or jurisdiction is hard to substitute in the current rule.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record predicts leverage beyond nominal share from counterfactual outcome necessity.", "role_mapping": "Nominal weight -> nominal share; actual necessity -> pivotality measure.", "slug": "pivotality", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b048_a11_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Nominal weight, formal rank, ownership share, or visible influence may diverge from actual outcome necessity. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Nominal weight, formal rank, ownership share, or visible influence may diverge from actual outcome necessity."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Pivotality", "one_liner": "An element whose participation is necessary for a collective outcome owns the marginal contribution and acquires leverage beyond its nominal share.", "page_ref": "prime:pivotality", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Nominal weight -> nominal share; actual necessity -> pivotality measure.", "slug": "pivotality", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record predicts leverage beyond nominal share from counterfactual outcome necessity."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Nominal weight or formal rank diverges from actual outcome necessity.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The mandatory removal test requires one candidate element to flip the outcome at the governing rule's boundary.", "role_mapping": "One unit -> candidate element; swing or block -> removal flip.", "slug": "pivotality", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b048_a11_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Collective outcomes often require commitment from enough parts, or from the right parts, but leverage is unevenly generated by the rule and context rather than by moral desert, formal rank, or effort alone. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The system is close enough to a threshold that one unit can swing, block, complete, or break the outcome.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The system is close enough to a threshold that one unit can swing, block, complete, or break the outcome.", "Collective outcomes often require commitment from enough parts, or from the right parts, but leverage is unevenly generated by the rule and context rather than by moral desert, formal rank, or effort alone."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Pivotality", "one_liner": "An element whose participation is necessary for a collective outcome owns the marginal contribution and acquires leverage beyond its nominal share.", "page_ref": "prime:pivotality", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "One unit -> candidate element; swing or block -> removal flip.", "slug": "pivotality", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The mandatory removal test requires one candidate element to flip the outcome at the governing rule's boundary."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The system is close enough to a threshold that one unit can swing, block, complete, or break the outcome.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Engagement, compensation, redundancy, or legitimacy choices depend on knowing who is actually decisive.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: Engagement, compensation, redundancy, or legitimacy choices depend on knowing who is actually decisive. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Engagement, compensation, redundancy, or legitimacy choices depend on knowing who is actually decisive."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "Engagement, compensation, redundancy, or legitimacy choices depend on knowing who is actually decisive."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 48, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-048", "ledger_sha256": "d8bfe806d1b487e6e5f37324637f30c8c1b270fb55d2ffb65e12a00fab7f5e2b"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Plateau Detection and Switching", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:plateau_detection_and_switching", "slug": "plateau_detection_and_switching"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Systems often remember what worked before. A campaign, lesson, staffing plan, enforcement policy, training protocol, or product tactic can become institutionally familiar because it produced gains at an earlier intensity. The same path may then continue receiving more input even after its response curve flattens.\n\nThe structural problem is a mismatch between historical usefulness and current marginal usefulness. The current path may still produce some total output, which makes it psychologically and politically hard to stop. But the relevant question has changed: will the next unit of input produce enough response to justify itself, or has the system reached a plateau that calls for another mechanism?", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system continues receiving more effort, input, money, exposure, enforcement, capacity, or repetition along the same path, but output, learning, compliance, conversion, throughput, or quality has stopped improving enough to justify escalation."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires an observed plateau, deceleration, or stall as the incumbent engine's accessible gains are exhausted.", "role_mapping": "Incremental input -> incumbent effort; flat response -> between-regime plateau.", "slug": "regime_transition_plateau", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b048_a12_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Incremental input produces little, no, or negative incremental response over a defined observation window. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Incremental input produces little, no, or negative incremental response over a defined observation window."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Regime Transition Plateau", "one_liner": "Progress stalls when the strategy that produced the current gains exhausts its inputs before the qualitatively different capabilities required for the next regime have been built.", "page_ref": "prime:regime_transition_plateau", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Incremental input -> incumbent effort; flat response -> between-regime plateau.", "slug": "regime_transition_plateau", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires an observed plateau, deceleration, or stall as the incumbent engine's accessible gains are exhausted."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Incremental input produces little, no, or negative incremental response over a defined window.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact record identifies the false-continuation move as a predicted failure but a plateau can be recognized before actors actually repeat escalation.", "slug": "regime_transition_plateau"}], "residual_id": "r:plateau_detection_and_switching:b048_a12_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b048_a12_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The same tactic has been escalated repeatedly because it once worked, but current marginal returns have flattened. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The same tactic has been escalated repeatedly because it once worked, but current marginal returns have flattened."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact record identifies the false-continuation move as a predicted failure but a plateau can be recognized before actors actually repeat escalation.", "slug": "regime_transition_plateau"}], "normalized_requirement": "The same tactic is repeatedly intensified because it once worked although current marginal returns are flat.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The same tactic is repeatedly intensified because it once worked although current marginal returns are flat.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires exhaustion of the incumbent engine plus an absent or immature capability different in kind for the successor regime.", "role_mapping": "Saturated path -> exhausted incumbent; different bottleneck -> successor capability gap.", "slug": "regime_transition_plateau", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b048_a12_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A channel, audience, resource, process, or learning pathway appears saturated or constrained by a different bottleneck. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A channel, audience, resource, process, or learning pathway appears saturated or constrained by a different bottleneck."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Regime Transition Plateau", "one_liner": "Progress stalls when the strategy that produced the current gains exhausts its inputs before the qualitatively different capabilities required for the next regime have been built.", "page_ref": "prime:regime_transition_plateau", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Saturated path -> exhausted incumbent; different bottleneck -> successor capability gap.", "slug": "regime_transition_plateau", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires exhaustion of the incumbent engine plus an absent or immature capability different in kind for the successor regime."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A channel, resource, process, audience, or learning pathway is saturated or constrained by a different bottleneck.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record names the false-continuation move: applying more of the old strategy because historical success is mistaken for continuing suitability.", "role_mapping": "More intensity -> false continuation; no progress -> exhaustion signal.", "slug": "regime_transition_plateau", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b048_a12_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Stakeholders are tempted to interpret lack of progress as a need for more intensity rather than as evidence of a plateau. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders are tempted to interpret lack of progress as a need for more intensity rather than as evidence of a plateau."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Regime Transition Plateau", "one_liner": "Progress stalls when the strategy that produced the current gains exhausts its inputs before the qualitatively different capabilities required for the next regime have been built.", "page_ref": "prime:regime_transition_plateau", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "More intensity -> false continuation; no progress -> exhaustion signal.", "slug": "regime_transition_plateau", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record names the false-continuation move: applying more of the old strategy because historical success is mistaken for continuing suitability."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Lack of progress is interpreted as a need for more intensity rather than evidence of a plateau.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Opportunity cost rises because the resources used for continued escalation could be tested against alternate strategies.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The current path has evidence of past usefulness, so escalation feels safer than switching; but the present marginal response suggests that continued escalation wastes resources, hides the real constraint, or increases harm. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: Opportunity cost rises because the resources used for continued escalation could be tested against alternate strategies. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Opportunity cost rises because the resources used for continued escalation could be tested against alternate strategies.", "The current path has evidence of past usefulness, so escalation feels safer than switching; but the present marginal response suggests that continued escalation wastes resources, hides the real constraint, or increases harm."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Opportunity cost rises because the resources used for continued escalation could be tested against alternate strategies."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 48, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-048", "ledger_sha256": "d8bfe806d1b487e6e5f37324637f30c8c1b270fb55d2ffb65e12a00fab7f5e2b"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Platform Core / Extension Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:platform_core_extension_design", "slug": "platform_core_extension_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Platform problems begin with a reuse–variation tension. Common capabilities are expensive, risky, or trust-sensitive enough to share, but participants need different domain behavior and cannot wait for every request to enter one core backlog. Without a deliberate boundary, two pathologies appear: duplicated foundations and an expanding monolith.\n\nDuplicated foundations waste effort and fragment identity, data, semantics, security, accessibility, and user experience. The monolith centralizes every feature, slows change, couples failures, and transfers local knowledge to a platform team that cannot possess it. Both destroy the leverage a platform should create.\n\nAccidental extensibility is another structural failure. Internal tables, undocumented hooks, copied libraries, and operator exceptions become de facto contracts. Dependents cannot predict changes, and the core cannot evolve without breakage. A platform must decide which surfaces it supports and migrate accidental dependents rather than silently accepting them forever.\n\nEcosystem power compounds technical coupling. The operator may control entry, ranking, data, fees, interfaces, and exit while competing with extensions. Growth can conceal dependency concentration, unfair burden, or systemic fragility. Platform design therefore includes governance and portability, not only architecture.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Many products, teams, systems, or participants repeatedly need common capabilities and controlled variation, but reuse is trapped inside monoliths, duplicated implementations, bespoke integrations, unstable interfaces, or operator-controlled ecosystems without governed extension and evolution."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A mature platform can serve independent applications without those builders currently repeating or duplicating the common capability.", "slug": "platform_design"}], "residual_id": "r:platform_core_extension_design:b048_a13_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b048_a13_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when several products, teams, systems, institutions, or complementors repeatedly need common foundational capabilities while also needing independent variation. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Multiple builders repeat foundational capability while differentiating at the edges.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Multiple builders repeat foundational capability while differentiating at the edges.", "Use this archetype when several products, teams, systems, institutions, or complementors repeatedly need common foundational capabilities while also needing independent variation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A mature platform can serve independent applications without those builders currently repeating or duplicating the common capability.", "slug": "platform_design"}], "normalized_requirement": "Multiple builders repeat foundational capability while differentiating at the edges.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Multiple builders repeat foundational capability while differentiating at the edges.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires an open extension surface through which new capability is added without modifying the protected core.", "role_mapping": "Extensions -> additions; stable surface -> open interface; internals -> closed core.", "slug": "open_closed_principle", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The exact record requires standardized interfaces enabling independent external development without modifying the platform core.", "role_mapping": "Extensions -> applications; stable surface -> platform interface; core internals -> common substrate.", "slug": "platform_design", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b048_a13_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The core must be stable and common enough to create reuse, compatibility, trust, and ecosystem leverage, yet thin and governable enough to preserve extension autonomy, local fit, innovation, exit, and adaptation. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Independent extensions need stable surfaces without access to core internals.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Independent extensions need stable surfaces without access to core internals.", "The core must be stable and common enough to create reuse, compatibility, trust, and ecosystem leverage, yet thin and governable enough to preserve extension autonomy, local fit, innovation, exit, and adaptation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Open-Closed Principle", "one_liner": "Harden a stable kernel against modification and route all change through an open extension surface.", "page_ref": "prime:open_closed_principle", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Extensions -> additions; stable surface -> open interface; internals -> closed core.", "slug": "open_closed_principle", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires an open extension surface through which new capability is added without modifying the protected core."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Platform Design", "one_liner": "Extensible core systems.", "page_ref": "prime:platform_design", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Extensions -> applications; stable surface -> platform interface; core internals -> common substrate.", "slug": "platform_design", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires standardized interfaces enabling independent external development without modifying the platform core."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Independent extensions need stable surfaces without access to core internals.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record treats surface extension as cheap and routine while core modification is rare, elevated, and high-ceremony.", "role_mapping": "Different cadences -> routine extension versus rare core change.", "slug": "open_closed_principle", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The exact record commits to a stable core while independent applications and extensions evolve.", "role_mapping": "Core cadence -> platform stability; extension cadence -> application evolution.", "slug": "platform_design", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b048_a13_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Core and extension changes must evolve on different cadences. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Core and extension changes must evolve on different cadences."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Open-Closed Principle", "one_liner": "Harden a stable kernel against modification and route all change through an open extension surface.", "page_ref": "prime:open_closed_principle", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Different cadences -> routine extension versus rare core change.", "slug": "open_closed_principle", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record treats surface extension as cheap and routine while core modification is rare, elevated, and high-ceremony."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Platform Design", "one_liner": "Extensible core systems.", "page_ref": "prime:platform_design", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Core cadence -> platform stability; extension cadence -> application evolution.", "slug": "platform_design", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record commits to a stable core while independent applications and extensions evolve."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Core and extension changes must evolve on different cadences and risk levels.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact platform includes discovery and governance but does not require a migration event or migration support in every instance.", "slug": "platform_design"}], "residual_id": "r:platform_core_extension_design:b048_a13_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b048_a13_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "If only one product exists, if extension demand is speculative, or if no team can sustain contracts, support, governance, and migration, ordinary modular architecture is more honest. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Participants need discoverable capabilities, predictable governance, and migration support.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Participants need discoverable capabilities, predictable governance, and migration support.", "If only one product exists, if extension demand is speculative, or if no team can sustain contracts, support, governance, and migration, ordinary modular architecture is more honest."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact platform includes discovery and governance but does not require a migration event or migration support in every instance.", "slug": "platform_design"}], "normalized_requirement": "Participants need discoverable capabilities, predictable governance, and migration support.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Participants need discoverable capabilities, predictable governance, and migration support.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A shared core could reduce fixed cost or improve trust, quality, compatibility, or discovery.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The core must be stable and common enough to create reuse, compatibility, trust, and ecosystem leverage, yet thin and governable enough to preserve extension autonomy, local fit, innovation, exit, and adaptation. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: A shared core could reduce fixed cost or improve trust, quality, compatibility, or discovery. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A shared core could reduce fixed cost or improve trust, quality, compatibility, or discovery.", "The core must be stable and common enough to create reuse, compatibility, trust, and ecosystem leverage, yet thin and governable enough to preserve extension autonomy, local fit, innovation, exit, and adaptation."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "A shared core could reduce fixed cost or improve trust, quality, compatibility, or discovery."}, {"display_text": "Network or ecosystem effects could amplify value and power.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Ecosystem power compounds technical coupling. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Network or ecosystem effects could amplify value and power. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Network or ecosystem effects could amplify value and power.", "Ecosystem power compounds technical coupling."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Network or ecosystem effects could amplify value and power."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 48, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-048", "ledger_sha256": "d8bfe806d1b487e6e5f37324637f30c8c1b270fb55d2ffb65e12a00fab7f5e2b"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Policy Evaluation Before Deployment", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:policy_evaluation_before_deployment", "slug": "policy_evaluation_before_deployment"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 1, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is premature deployment of a rule whose trajectory behavior has not been inspected. A policy can pass local plausibility checks: it seems logical, aligns with an objective, and handles common examples. Yet repeated use may create delayed costs, edge-case failures, subgroup harms, feedback loops, or operational overload.\n\nThis is different from simply needing a better policy. The policy may already be designed. The unresolved risk is that deployment will expose behavior the design process did not see.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A rule or policy is ready to be deployed because it appears locally reasonable, but no one has checked how it behaves across sequences of states, plausible future scenarios, historical traces, edge cases, or affected contexts."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P089-C08", "dnf": [], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [], "predicate": "A policy will operate repeatedly, automatically, or semi-automatically across many cases.", "resolution": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RESIDUAL", "semantic_scope": "NON_ABSTRACTION", "structural_head": "policy recurs across many cases", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P089-C08-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A script can describe one familiar episode and need not be a policy applied across many cases.", "slug": "script"}], "residual_id": "r:policy_evaluation_before_deployment:b048_a14_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b048_a14_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when a policy, rule, or protocol will act repeatedly across cases or states and bad behavior may only become visible over sequences of decisions. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A policy will operate repeatedly, automatically, or semi-automatically across many cases.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A policy will operate repeatedly, automatically, or semi-automatically across many cases.", "Use this archetype when a policy, rule, or protocol will act repeatedly across cases or states and bad behavior may only become visible over sequences of decisions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RECLASSIFIED", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 1, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A script can describe one familiar episode and need not be a policy applied across many cases.", "slug": "script"}], "normalized_requirement": "A policy will operate repeatedly, automatically, or semi-automatically across many cases.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RECLASSIFIED", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later candidate-blind atomization classified this remainder as a threshold, parameter, materiality test, or other non-abstraction rather than a catalog gap."}, "predicate": "A policy will operate repeatedly, automatically, or semi-automatically across many cases.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Forward-looking offset can occur after a one-time announcement and does not require a repeatedly operating policy.", "slug": "anticipatory_neutralization"}], "residual_id": "r:policy_evaluation_before_deployment:b048_a14_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b048_a14_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Actions taken under the policy alter future states, options, costs, risk, or service quality. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Actions taken under the policy alter future states, options, costs, risk, or service quality."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Forward-looking offset can occur after a one-time announcement and does not require a repeatedly operating policy.", "slug": "anticipatory_neutralization"}], "normalized_requirement": "Actions under the policy alter future states, options, costs, risk, or service quality.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Actions under the policy alter future states, options, costs, risk, or service quality.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A holdout set is disjoint from model shaping, but it need not approximate the future deployment distribution or use any listed policy-evaluation substrate.", "slug": "holdout_set"}], "residual_id": "r:policy_evaluation_before_deployment:b048_a14_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b048_a14_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Historical traces, simulated scenarios, shadow-mode outputs, or expert-constructed cases can approximate likely deployment conditions. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Historical traces, simulated scenarios, shadow-mode outputs, or expert-constructed cases can approximate likely deployment conditions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A holdout set is disjoint from model shaping, but it need not approximate the future deployment distribution or use any listed policy-evaluation substrate.", "slug": "holdout_set"}], "normalized_requirement": "Historical traces, simulation, shadow outputs, or constructed cases can approximate likely deployment conditions.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Historical traces, simulation, shadow outputs, or constructed cases can approximate likely deployment conditions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The policy may affect safety, access, fairness, capacity, compliance, or irreversible outcomes.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when the policy affects safety, access, capacity, fairness, workload, cost, compliance, or irreversible outcomes. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The policy may affect safety, access, fairness, capacity, compliance, or irreversible outcomes. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The policy may affect safety, access, fairness, capacity, compliance, or irreversible outcomes.", "It is especially useful when the policy affects safety, access, capacity, fairness, workload, cost, compliance, or irreversible outcomes."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "The policy may affect safety, access, fairness, capacity, compliance, or irreversible outcomes."}, {"display_text": "There is enough time and authority to revise, constrain, pilot, or withhold the policy before full release.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: There is enough time and authority to revise, constrain, pilot, or withhold the policy before full release. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["There is enough time and authority to revise, constrain, pilot, or withhold the policy before full release."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "There is enough time and authority to revise, constrain, pilot, or withhold the policy before full release."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 48, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-048", "ledger_sha256": "d8bfe806d1b487e6e5f37324637f30c8c1b270fb55d2ffb65e12a00fab7f5e2b"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Polyphonic Coherence Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:polyphonic_coherence_design", "slug": "polyphonic_coherence_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 7 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 7}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Several voices, streams, modules, disciplines, perspectives, narratives, constraints, or roles need to operate together, but available structures either collapse them into one aggregate, separate them into silos, or let them interfere as noise. The challenge is to preserve independent identity while making interaction coherent.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Several voices, streams, modules, disciplines, perspectives, narratives, constraints, or roles need to operate together, but available structures either collapse them into one aggregate, separate them into silos, or let them interfere as noise. The challenge is to preserve independent identity while making interaction coherent."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires several independent lines on a shared substrate, each retaining legible identity.", "role_mapping": "Perspectives or workstreams -> independent lines; inspectability -> audibility invariant.", "slug": "polyphony", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b048_a15_c1a", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Multiple perspectives or workstreams are all valid and must remain inspectable. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Multiple perspectives or workstreams are all valid and must remain inspectable."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Polyphony", "one_liner": "Several independent lines coexist on a shared substrate, each retaining its own legible identity, while their interaction generates a coherent whole that none produces alone.", "page_ref": "prime:polyphony", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Perspectives or workstreams -> independent lines; inspectability -> audibility invariant.", "slug": "polyphony", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires several independent lines on a shared substrate, each retaining legible identity."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Multiple perspectives or workstreams coexist as independent legible lines.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P089-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve differentiated information that can be aggregated.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Multiple distinguishable information streams are available for synthesis.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail information loss caused by single synthesis.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Collapsing the streams into a single synthesis would erase the selected information type.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the would-level prospective modality.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The erasure is a projected consequence of using a single synthesis.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires erasure of minority information.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The erased information is minority information.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires erasure of expert information.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The erased information is expert information.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires erasure of local information.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The erased information is local information.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires erasure of temporal information.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The erased information is temporal information.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires erasure of counterpoint information.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The erased information is counterpoint information.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A single synthesis would erase one listed type of independently valuable information.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "single synthesis erases differentiated information", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P089-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Polyphony preserves independent lines, but a valid instance need not face or have suffered an erasing synthesis.", "slug": "polyphony"}], "residual_id": "r:polyphonic_coherence_design:b048_a15_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b048_a15_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A single synthesis would erase minority, expert, local, temporal, or counterpoint information. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A single synthesis would erase minority, expert, local, temporal, or counterpoint information."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A complete instance lacking the tested branch was attempted, but the cited exact structural signature makes all branch obligations necessary.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Counterpoint", "one_liner": "Write several voices that are each a complete, independent melody while every vertical slice they form is also defensible harmony — a dual demand a catalogue of local voice-leading rules turns into beat-by-beat checks.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:counterpoint", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "counterpoint"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "counterpoint", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P089-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent reconciliation confirms the exact-record DNF mapping. The exact record entails one complete DNF branch without adding a contingent fact or interpretive bridge."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A complete instance lacking the tested branch was attempted, but the cited exact structural signature makes all branch obligations necessary.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Fugue", "one_liner": "Build a piece from a short distinctive melodic subject that enters voice by voice and returns across the work, so several genuinely independent lines imitate one idea while sounding coherent harmony at every beat.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:fugue", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "fugue"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "fugue", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P089-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent reconciliation confirms the exact-record DNF mapping. The exact record entails one complete DNF branch without adding a contingent fact or interpretive bridge."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A single synthesis would erase minority, expert, local, temporal, or counterpoint information.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires independent distinguishable lines coinciding on a shared time, space, protocol, or topic.", "role_mapping": "Parallel channels -> independent lines; shared timing or substrate -> shared substrate.", "slug": "polyphony", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The exact record shares one channel among multiple signals by time, frequency, or code divisions that preserve separability.", "role_mapping": "Parallel channels -> signals; shared substrate -> multiplexed channel; distinguishability -> division code.", "slug": "multiplexing", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b048_a15_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Parallel channels need shared timing, references, or substrate without becoming one undifferentiated channel. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Parallel channels need shared timing, references, or substrate without becoming one undifferentiated channel."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Polyphony", "one_liner": "Several independent lines coexist on a shared substrate, each retaining its own legible identity, while their interaction generates a coherent whole that none produces alone.", "page_ref": "prime:polyphony", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Parallel channels -> independent lines; shared timing or substrate -> shared substrate.", "slug": "polyphony", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires independent distinguishable lines coinciding on a shared time, space, protocol, or topic."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Multiplexing", "one_liner": "Sharing one channel among many signals by dividing time, frequency, or code.", "page_ref": "prime:multiplexing", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Parallel channels -> signals; shared substrate -> multiplexed channel; distinguishability -> division code.", "slug": "multiplexing", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record shares one channel among multiple signals by time, frequency, or code divisions that preserve separability."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Parallel channels share timing, references, or substrate while remaining distinguishable.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires an emergent coherent whole produced by interaction among independent lines.", "role_mapping": "Group lines -> voices; changed whole -> emergent coherence.", "slug": "polyphony", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b048_a15_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A group needs more than inclusion: it needs interaction among lines that changes the whole. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A group needs more than inclusion: it needs interaction among lines that changes the whole."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Polyphony", "one_liner": "Several independent lines coexist on a shared substrate, each retaining its own legible identity, while their interaction generates a coherent whole that none produces alone.", "page_ref": "prime:polyphony", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Group lines -> voices; changed whole -> emergent coherence.", "slug": "polyphony", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires an emergent coherent whole produced by interaction among independent lines."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Interaction among independent lines changes the whole rather than merely including them side by side.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The mandatory audibility invariant keeps every contributing line perceptible as itself within the combination.", "role_mapping": "Source traceability -> line identity; combination -> shared substrate and emergent whole.", "slug": "polyphony", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b048_a15_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Modules, agents, teams, voices, or narratives should combine while retaining source traceability. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Modules, agents, teams, voices, or narratives should combine while retaining source traceability."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Polyphony", "one_liner": "Several independent lines coexist on a shared substrate, each retaining its own legible identity, while their interaction generates a coherent whole that none produces alone.", "page_ref": "prime:polyphony", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source traceability -> line identity; combination -> shared substrate and emergent whole.", "slug": "polyphony", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The mandatory audibility invariant keeps every contributing line perceptible as itself within the combination."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Modules, teams, voices, or narratives combine while retaining their source identity.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Polyphony can be consonant throughout and need not include informative dissonance or overload.", "slug": "polyphony"}], "residual_id": "r:polyphonic_coherence_design:b048_a15_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b048_a15_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Dissonance is informative but unmanaged conflict creates overload. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Dissonance is informative but unmanaged conflict creates overload."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Polyphony can be consonant throughout and need not include informative dissonance or overload.", "slug": "polyphony"}], "normalized_requirement": "Dissonance carries information while unmanaged conflict creates overload.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Dissonance carries information while unmanaged conflict creates overload.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid polyphonic structure already has an interaction grammar and need not alternate between either failure mode.", "slug": "polyphony"}], "residual_id": "r:polyphonic_coherence_design:b048_a15_c7", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b048_a15_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A system alternates between cacophony and forced consensus because it lacks a grammar for coexistence. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A system alternates between cacophony and forced consensus because it lacks a grammar for coexistence."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid polyphonic structure already has an interaction grammar and need not alternate between either failure mode.", "slug": "polyphony"}], "normalized_requirement": "The system alternates between cacophony and forced consensus because it lacks a coexistence grammar.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The system alternates between cacophony and forced consensus because it lacks a coexistence grammar.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Audience, users, or operators need to follow several lines at once without losing orientation.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: Audience, users, or operators need to follow several lines at once without losing orientation. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Audience, users, or operators need to follow several lines at once without losing orientation."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 8, "text": "Audience, users, or operators need to follow several lines at once without losing orientation."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 48, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-048", "ledger_sha256": "d8bfe806d1b487e6e5f37324637f30c8c1b270fb55d2ffb65e12a00fab7f5e2b"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Polysemy Disambiguation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:polysemy_disambiguation", "slug": "polysemy_disambiguation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is false sameness. One sign form is shared, but multiple meanings are active. Participants may think they agree because the wording matches, while they actually act from different senses.\n\nFor example, “client” might mean software client, paying customer, legal client, or organizational account. “Active user” might mean currently online, active within seven days, licensed, or engaged above a threshold. “Positive” might mean favorable in everyday speech but detected in a clinical test. The term is not random; its senses are related enough that reuse feels natural, which is exactly why the disagreement can stay hidden.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A shared sign form has several related meanings, and participants, readers, users, systems, or stakeholders activate different senses while assuming they are talking about the same thing."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires one sign form with multiple related senses.", "role_mapping": "Term -> sign form; plausible meanings -> related senses.", "slug": "polysemy", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b049_a01_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A term appears in a policy, interface, contract, standard, lesson, taxonomy, or conversation where several plausible related meanings could apply. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A term appears in a policy, interface, contract, standard, lesson, taxonomy, or conversation where several plausible related meanings could apply."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Polysemy", "one_liner": "Multiple meanings.", "page_ref": "prime:polysemy", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Term -> sign form; plausible meanings -> related senses.", "slug": "polysemy", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires one sign form with multiple related senses."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A term appears where several plausible related meanings could apply.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A polysemous sign can be used with one contextually obvious sense and cause no participant disagreement.", "slug": "polysemy"}], "residual_id": "r:polysemy_disambiguation:b049_a01_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b049_a01_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Participants repeatedly ask “What do you mean by this?” or proceed confidently but later reveal incompatible interpretations. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Participants repeatedly ask “What do you mean by this?” or proceed confidently but later reveal incompatible interpretations."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A polysemous sign can be used with one contextually obvious sense and cause no participant disagreement.", "slug": "polysemy"}], "normalized_requirement": "Participants seek clarification or proceed with incompatible interpretations while assuming agreement.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Participants seek clarification or proceed with incompatible interpretations while assuming agreement.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record includes a shared form whose related senses differentiate across usage contexts.", "role_mapping": "Everyday and technical uses -> related senses of one sign.", "slug": "polysemy", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b049_a01_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A familiar everyday word is reused as a technical, legal, organizational, or product-specific term. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A familiar everyday word is reused as a technical, legal, organizational, or product-specific term."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Polysemy", "one_liner": "Multiple meanings.", "page_ref": "prime:polysemy", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Everyday and technical uses -> related senses of one sign.", "slug": "polysemy", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record includes a shared form whose related senses differentiate across usage contexts."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "An everyday word is reused as a technical, legal, organizational, or product-specific term.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires related rather than unrelated senses carried by one shared form.", "role_mapping": "Communities -> interpretive contexts; overlapping senses -> related meanings.", "slug": "polysemy", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b049_a01_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Different teams, audiences, systems, jurisdictions, disciplines, or communities use the same label with overlapping but non-identical senses. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Different teams, audiences, systems, jurisdictions, disciplines, or communities use the same label with overlapping but non-identical senses."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Polysemy", "one_liner": "Multiple meanings.", "page_ref": "prime:polysemy", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Communities -> interpretive contexts; overlapping senses -> related meanings.", "slug": "polysemy", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires related rather than unrelated senses carried by one shared form."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Different communities use the same label with overlapping but non-identical senses.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A polysemous term can have an explicit context rule that selects its local sense.", "slug": "polysemy"}], "residual_id": "r:polysemy_disambiguation:b049_a01_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b049_a01_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A definition exists, but it does not specify which sense governs a particular local use. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A definition exists, but it does not specify which sense governs a particular local use."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A polysemous term can have an explicit context rule that selects its local sense.", "slug": "polysemy"}], "normalized_requirement": "A definition exists but does not bind which sense governs one local use.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A definition exists but does not bind which sense governs one local use.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 49, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-049", "ledger_sha256": "a54629090ff96c10a23ba2e672d91d9818616e397e8d28216e65745528896750"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Pooling Threshold and Minimum Scale Determination", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:pooling_threshold_and_minimum_scale_determination", "slug": "pooling_threshold_and_minimum_scale_determination"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 1, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 6 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A group wants the benefits of pooled risk, shared reserves, mutual insurance, or exposure aggregation, but it is unclear whether the proposed pool has enough effective independent exposures and operating scale to reduce volatility after administration, selection effects, correlated shocks, and reserve requirements are included.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A group wants the benefits of pooled risk, shared reserves, mutual insurance, or exposure aggregation, but it is unclear whether the proposed pool has enough effective independent exposures and operating scale to reduce volatility after administration, selection effects, correlated shocks, and reserve requirements are included."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P089-C10", "dnf": [], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [], "predicate": "A small pool is expanding or contracting, and whether it remains viable is uncertain and must be determined.", "resolution": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RESIDUAL", "semantic_scope": "NON_ABSTRACTION", "structural_head": "changing small pool has uncertain viability", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P089-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Risk pooling can occur at a large, demonstrably viable scale and need not be expanding or contracting.", "slug": "risk_pooling"}], "residual_id": "r:pooling_threshold_and_minimum_scale_determination:b049_a02_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b049_a02_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A small pool is expanding or contracting and the designer must know whether it remains viable. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A small pool is expanding or contracting and the designer must know whether it remains viable."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RECLASSIFIED", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 1, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Risk pooling can occur at a large, demonstrably viable scale and need not be expanding or contracting.", "slug": "risk_pooling"}], "normalized_requirement": "A small pool is changing size and its continued viability is uncertain.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RECLASSIFIED", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later candidate-blind atomization classified this remainder as a threshold, parameter, materiality test, or other non-abstraction rather than a catalog gap."}, "predicate": "A small pool is changing size and its continued viability is uncertain.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact pooling benefit is conditional on independent or weakly correlated exposures and does not require this mistaken assumption.", "slug": "risk_pooling"}], "residual_id": "r:pooling_threshold_and_minimum_scale_determination:b049_a02_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b049_a02_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Participants assume that adding more members automatically improves stability, even though many members may share the same risk driver. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Participants assume that adding more members automatically improves stability, even though many members may share the same risk driver."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact pooling benefit is conditional on independent or weakly correlated exposures and does not require this mistaken assumption.", "slug": "risk_pooling"}], "normalized_requirement": "Participants assume more members automatically improve stability despite a shared risk driver.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Participants assume more members automatically improve stability despite a shared risk driver.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P089-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the cost-versus-gain comparison in which fixed cost can dominate.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The selected fixed cost can exceed or overwhelm the gains expected from pooling.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve possibility rather than inevitability.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The fixed cost may overwhelm pooling gains rather than being certain to do so.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires fixed administration cost to threaten pooling gains.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The fixed cost is administration cost.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires fixed claims-handling cost to threaten pooling gains.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The fixed cost is claims-handling cost.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires fixed governance cost to threaten pooling gains.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The fixed cost is governance cost.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires fixed compliance cost to threaten pooling gains.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The fixed cost is compliance cost.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires fixed monitoring cost to threaten pooling gains.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The fixed cost is monitoring cost.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "One listed fixed cost may overwhelm the expected gains from pooling.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "fixed operating cost may exceed expected pooling gain", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P089-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Economies of scale can already dominate fixed costs and need not concern a risk pool.", "slug": "economies_of_scale"}], "residual_id": "r:pooling_threshold_and_minimum_scale_determination:b049_a02_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b049_a02_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Fixed administration, claims handling, governance, compliance, or monitoring costs may overwhelm expected pooling gains. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Fixed administration, claims handling, governance, compliance, or monitoring costs may overwhelm expected pooling gains."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Economies of scale can already dominate fixed costs and need not concern a risk pool.", "slug": "economies_of_scale"}], "normalized_requirement": "Fixed administration, claims, governance, compliance, or monitoring costs may overwhelm pooling gains.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Fixed administration, claims, governance, compliance, or monitoring costs may overwhelm pooling gains.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires multiple demands to rise together under a common driver, defeating independent capacity assumptions.", "role_mapping": "Loss exposures -> demands; common shock -> shared driver; pool reserve -> capacity.", "slug": "correlated_capacity_demand", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b049_a02_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Losses are heterogeneous, heavy-tailed, seasonal, geographically clustered, or exposed to common shocks. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Losses are heterogeneous, heavy-tailed, seasonal, geographically clustered, or exposed to common shocks."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Correlated Capacity Demand", "one_liner": "When demands on a shared finite resource are tail-correlated rather than independent, capacity sized for independent peaks fails at the rare joint exceedance.", "page_ref": "prime:correlated_capacity_demand", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Loss exposures -> demands; common shock -> shared driver; pool reserve -> capacity.", "slug": "correlated_capacity_demand", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires multiple demands to rise together under a common driver, defeating independent capacity assumptions."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Losses are exposed to common drivers or clustered demand, limiting effective independence.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P089-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve contribution rules and a membership pool affected by them.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Contribution rules govern participation in a pool.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve possibility rather than inevitable exit or entry.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The selected adverse-selection response may occur.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must link the rule defect to the membership response.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The selected defect in contribution rules induces or conditions the selected adverse-selection response.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch component requires low-risk members to leave the pool.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The response is exit by low-risk members.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch component requires high-risk members to enter the pool.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The response is entry by high-risk members.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch component requires lack of credibility in the contribution rules.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The contribution rules are not credible.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch component requires unfair contribution rules.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The contribution rules are not fair.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "If contribution rules are not credible or not fair, low-risk members may leave or high-risk members may enter.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "defective contribution rules induce adverse pool selection", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P089-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A risk pool can use actuarially credible rules with stable membership and no selection shift.", "slug": "risk_pooling"}], "residual_id": "r:pooling_threshold_and_minimum_scale_determination:b049_a02_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b049_a02_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Low-risk members may leave or high-risk members may enter if contribution rules are not credible or fair. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Low-risk members may leave or high-risk members may enter if contribution rules are not credible or fair."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A risk pool can use actuarially credible rules with stable membership and no selection shift.", "slug": "risk_pooling"}], "normalized_requirement": "Contribution rules may induce low-risk exit or high-risk entry.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Contribution rules may induce low-risk exit or high-risk entry.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P089-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a pool and its promised outcome level.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A pool promises a specified level of the selected outcome.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve reserve-threshold necessity for the promise.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Fulfilling that promise requires an explicit reserve threshold.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve scale-threshold necessity jointly with the reserve threshold.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Fulfilling that promise also requires an explicit minimum-scale threshold.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a promised level of protection.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The promised outcome is protection.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a promised level of solvency.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The promised outcome is solvency.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a promised level of service continuity.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The promised outcome is service continuity.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A pool's promised level of protection, solvency, or service continuity requires explicit reserve and minimum-scale thresholds.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "pool promise requires explicit reserve and scale thresholds", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P089-C13-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Risk pooling does not itself require a declared solvency promise or one explicit minimum-scale threshold.", "slug": "risk_pooling"}], "residual_id": "r:pooling_threshold_and_minimum_scale_determination:b049_a02_c7", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b049_a02_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A pool promises a level of protection, solvency, or service continuity that requires explicit reserve and scale thresholds. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A pool promises a level of protection, solvency, or service continuity that requires explicit reserve and scale thresholds."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Risk pooling does not itself require a declared solvency promise or one explicit minimum-scale threshold.", "slug": "risk_pooling"}], "normalized_requirement": "Promised protection requires an explicit reserve and minimum-scale threshold.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Promised protection requires an explicit reserve and minimum-scale threshold.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A new insurance, mutual-aid, guarantee, benefits, safety, or reserve pool is being launched.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A group wants the benefits of pooled risk, shared reserves, mutual insurance, or exposure aggregation, but it is unclear whether the proposed pool has enough effective independent exposures and operating scale to reduce volatility after administration, selection effects, correlated shocks, and reserve requirements are included. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: A new insurance, mutual-aid, guarantee, benefits, safety, or reserve pool is being launched. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A new insurance, mutual-aid, guarantee, benefits, safety, or reserve pool is being launched.", "A group wants the benefits of pooled risk, shared reserves, mutual insurance, or exposure aggregation, but it is unclear whether the proposed pool has enough effective independent exposures and operating scale to reduce volatility after administration, selection effects, correlated shocks, and reserve requirements are included."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "A new insurance, mutual-aid, guarantee, benefits, safety, or reserve pool is being launched."}, {"display_text": "Decision-makers need a go/no-go rule for launch, closure, merger, segmentation, or external backstop design.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: Decision-makers need a go/no-go rule for launch, closure, merger, segmentation, or external backstop design. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Decision-makers need a go/no-go rule for launch, closure, merger, segmentation, or external backstop design."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 8, "text": "Decision-makers need a go/no-go rule for launch, closure, merger, segmentation, or external backstop design."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 49, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-049", "ledger_sha256": "a54629090ff96c10a23ba2e672d91d9818616e397e8d28216e65745528896750"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Population-Code Readout Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:population_code_readout_design", "slug": "population_code_readout_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A target state or quantity is observable only through many individually noisy, partial, or context-dependent elements, and single-channel readings or simple aggregates either lose the useful pattern or become brittle.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A target state or quantity is observable only through many individually noisy, partial, or context-dependent elements, and single-channel readings or simple aggregates either lose the useful pattern or become brittle."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record represents a variable in the joint activity of many elements rather than any single channel.", "role_mapping": "Element -> coding unit; target quantity -> represented variable.", "slug": "population_coding", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b049_a03_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: No single element is sufficiently precise, stable, or broadly tuned to infer the target quantity alone. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["No single element is sufficiently precise, stable, or broadly tuned to infer the target quantity alone."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Population Coding", "one_liner": "Information about a quantity is carried by the joint pattern across many individually noisy elements and read out by a decoder, yielding precision and robustness no single element provides.", "page_ref": "prime:population_coding", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Element -> coding unit; target quantity -> represented variable.", "slug": "population_coding", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record represents a variable in the joint activity of many elements rather than any single channel."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "No single element is sufficiently precise, stable, or broadly tuned to infer the target alone.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires heterogeneous tuning curves across a population of coding elements.", "role_mapping": "Different responses -> tuning profiles; quantity regions -> represented variable values.", "slug": "population_coding", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b049_a03_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Different elements respond to different regions, features, times, contexts, or magnitudes of the same underlying quantity. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Different elements respond to different regions, features, times, contexts, or magnitudes of the same underlying quantity."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Population Coding", "one_liner": "Information about a quantity is carried by the joint pattern across many individually noisy elements and read out by a decoder, yielding precision and robustness no single element provides.", "page_ref": "prime:population_coding", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Different responses -> tuning profiles; quantity regions -> represented variable values.", "slug": "population_coding", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires heterogeneous tuning curves across a population of coding elements."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Different elements respond to different regions, features, times, contexts, or magnitudes of one quantity.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record locates representation in the distributed population pattern and requires a decoder over that joint pattern.", "role_mapping": "Joint activity -> population vector; lost information -> decoder-relevant pattern.", "slug": "population_coding", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b049_a03_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The joint activity pattern contains information that is lost when readings are prematurely averaged, ranked, or thresholded. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The joint activity pattern contains information that is lost when readings are prematurely averaged, ranked, or thresholded."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Population Coding", "one_liner": "Information about a quantity is carried by the joint pattern across many individually noisy elements and read out by a decoder, yielding precision and robustness no single element provides.", "page_ref": "prime:population_coding", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Joint activity -> population vector; lost information -> decoder-relevant pattern.", "slug": "population_coding", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record locates representation in the distributed population pattern and requires a decoder over that joint pattern."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The joint activity pattern contains information lost by premature averaging, ranking, or thresholding.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires continued correct service despite failure of one or more components.", "role_mapping": "Dead or missing element -> failed component; readout -> service.", "slug": "fault_tolerance", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b049_a03_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Robustness requires the system to tolerate dead, noisy, missing, saturated, or temporarily untrusted elements. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Robustness requires the system to tolerate dead, noisy, missing, saturated, or temporarily untrusted elements."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Fault Tolerance", "one_liner": "Continue operating under failure.", "page_ref": "prime:fault_tolerance", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Dead or missing element -> failed component; readout -> service.", "slug": "fault_tolerance", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires continued correct service despite failure of one or more components."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The readout must tolerate dead, missing, noisy, saturated, or temporarily untrusted elements.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A decoder can be specified, learned, calibrated, or validated against reference cases, feedback, or ground truth.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Distributed evidence can provide precision and fault tolerance, but only if the system pays the complexity cost of preserving the joint pattern, modeling element meaning, and maintaining a calibrated decoder. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: A decoder can be specified, learned, calibrated, or validated against reference cases, feedback, or ground truth. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A decoder can be specified, learned, calibrated, or validated against reference cases, feedback, or ground truth.", "Distributed evidence can provide precision and fault tolerance, but only if the system pays the complexity cost of preserving the joint pattern, modeling element meaning, and maintaining a calibrated decoder."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "A decoder can be specified, learned, calibrated, or validated against reference cases, feedback, or ground truth."}, {"display_text": "The decision user needs an estimate with uncertainty rather than a raw dashboard of many signals.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: The decision user needs an estimate with uncertainty rather than a raw dashboard of many signals. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The decision user needs an estimate with uncertainty rather than a raw dashboard of many signals."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The decision user needs an estimate with uncertainty rather than a raw dashboard of many signals."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 49, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-049", "ledger_sha256": "a54629090ff96c10a23ba2e672d91d9818616e397e8d28216e65745528896750"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Portable Dependency Envelope", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:portable_dependency_envelope", "slug": "portable_dependency_envelope"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 5 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A useful unit depends on libraries, tools, materials, records, permissions, environmental assumptions, spatial arrangements, or social context that are obvious in the origin setting but absent, different, or invisible in the receiving setting. When the unit is moved without those dependencies, handlers must reconstruct the missing context, make unsafe assumptions, or inspect internals they are not equipped to understand.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A useful unit depends on libraries, tools, materials, records, permissions, environmental assumptions, spatial arrangements, or social context that are obvious in the origin setting but absent, different, or invisible in the receiving setting. When the unit is moved without those dependencies, handlers must reconstruct the missing context, make unsafe assumptions, or inspect internals they are not equipped to understand."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A containerized unit can remain on one machine or within one organization indefinitely.", "slug": "containerization"}], "residual_id": "r:portable_dependency_envelope:b049_a04_c1", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b049_a04_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The same unit must cross machines, teams, organizations, carriers, jurisdictions, laboratories, classrooms, or operational sites. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The same unit must cross machines, teams, organizations, carriers, jurisdictions, laboratories, classrooms, or operational sites."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A containerized unit can remain on one machine or within one organization indefinitely.", "slug": "containerization"}], "normalized_requirement": "The same unit must cross machines, teams, organizations, carriers, jurisdictions, laboratories, classrooms, or sites.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The same unit must cross machines, teams, organizations, carriers, jurisdictions, laboratories, classrooms, or sites.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record wraps a unit and dependencies behind a standardized exterior so substrate-blind handlers can move it intact.", "role_mapping": "Uniform exterior -> standardized container boundary; heterogeneous interiors -> wrapped unit and dependencies.", "slug": "containerization", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b049_a04_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Handlers need a uniform exterior procedure even though interiors are heterogeneous. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Handlers need a uniform exterior procedure even though interiors are heterogeneous."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Containerization", "one_liner": "Wrap a unit with its dependencies behind a standardized exterior so substrate-blind handlers can move it intact.", "page_ref": "prime:containerization", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Uniform exterior -> standardized container boundary; heterogeneous interiors -> wrapped unit and dependencies.", "slug": "containerization", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record wraps a unit and dependencies behind a standardized exterior so substrate-blind handlers can move it intact."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Handlers need a uniform exterior procedure around heterogeneous interiors.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid containerized unit carries its dependencies and need not fail after transfer.", "slug": "containerization"}], "residual_id": "r:portable_dependency_envelope:b049_a04_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b049_a04_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The unit fails when an unstated local dependency, version, material, credential, fixture, or environmental assumption is missing. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The unit fails when an unstated local dependency, version, material, credential, fixture, or environmental assumption is missing."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid containerized unit carries its dependencies and need not fail after transfer.", "slug": "containerization"}], "normalized_requirement": "The transferred unit fails when an unstated local dependency or environmental assumption is missing.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The transferred unit fails when an unstated local dependency or environmental assumption is missing.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A container can be adopted for integrity or isolation even when manual reassembly is cheap.", "slug": "containerization"}], "residual_id": "r:portable_dependency_envelope:b049_a04_c4", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b049_a04_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The cost of unpacking or reassembling the unit at every transfer point is high. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The cost of unpacking or reassembling the unit at every transfer point is high."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A container can be adopted for integrity or isolation even when manual reassembly is cheap.", "slug": "containerization"}], "normalized_requirement": "Unpacking or reassembling the unit at every transfer point is costly.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Unpacking or reassembling the unit at every transfer point is costly.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A standardized container exterior does not necessarily carry attestations of compatibility, integrity, and safety.", "slug": "containerization"}], "residual_id": "r:portable_dependency_envelope:b049_a04_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b049_a04_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Interior detail should remain encapsulated, but compatibility, integrity, and safety still need external evidence. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Interior detail should remain encapsulated, but compatibility, integrity, and safety still need external evidence."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A standardized container exterior does not necessarily carry attestations of compatibility, integrity, and safety.", "slug": "containerization"}], "normalized_requirement": "Interior detail should remain encapsulated while compatibility, integrity, and safety receive external evidence.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Interior detail should remain encapsulated while compatibility, integrity, and safety receive external evidence.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The system needs reproducibility, safe handoff, or repeatable deployment across substrates.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: The system needs reproducibility, safe handoff, or repeatable deployment across substrates. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The system needs reproducibility, safe handoff, or repeatable deployment across substrates."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The system needs reproducibility, safe handoff, or repeatable deployment across substrates."}, {"display_text": "The receiving environment must reject, quarantine, or adapt incompatible envelopes before activation.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: The receiving environment must reject, quarantine, or adapt incompatible envelopes before activation. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The receiving environment must reject, quarantine, or adapt incompatible envelopes before activation."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "The receiving environment must reject, quarantine, or adapt incompatible envelopes before activation."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 49, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-049", "ledger_sha256": "a54629090ff96c10a23ba2e672d91d9818616e397e8d28216e65745528896750"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Position-Based Leverage Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:position_based_leverage_design", "slug": "position_based_leverage_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "An actor is trying to improve outcomes in a field where positions differ in value, but it treats location, sequence, network role, interface placement, market niche, or discourse stance as incidental. It then compensates with more force, resources, persuasion, or effort instead of moving to a position where the field itself supplies advantage.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "An actor is trying to improve outcomes in a field where positions differ in value, but it treats location, sequence, network role, interface placement, market niche, or discourse stance as incidental. It then compensates with more force, resources, persuasion, or effort instead of moving to a position where the field itself supplies advantage."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires a location or network role whose relational placement yields disproportionate payoff.", "role_mapping": "Field position -> relational location; returns -> positional payoff.", "slug": "positional_advantage", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b049_a05_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Position-dependent returns. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Position-dependent returns"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Positional Advantage", "one_liner": "Occupying a location in a value-graded space such that the position itself confers advantage — leverage, reach, defensibility, reaction-time — independent of the resources or force held at that location.", "page_ref": "prime:positional_advantage", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Field position -> relational location; returns -> positional payoff.", "slug": "positional_advantage", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires a location or network role whose relational placement yields disproportionate payoff."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Returns depend materially on position in a field.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record includes locations whose access, visibility, reaction time, or reach differs because of relational placement.", "role_mapping": "Reach or latency -> access and reaction-time advantage.", "slug": "positional_advantage", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b049_a05_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Unequal reach or latency. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Unequal reach or latency"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Positional Advantage", "one_liner": "Occupying a location in a value-graded space such that the position itself confers advantage — leverage, reach, defensibility, reaction-time — independent of the resources or force held at that location.", "page_ref": "prime:positional_advantage", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Reach or latency -> access and reaction-time advantage.", "slug": "positional_advantage", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record includes locations whose access, visibility, reaction time, or reach differs because of relational placement."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Positions provide unequal reach or latency.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires a position whose topology or relation supplies advantage without proportional additional force.", "role_mapping": "Defensible location -> structurally advantaged position.", "slug": "positional_advantage", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b049_a05_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Defensible or privileged locations. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Defensible or privileged locations"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Positional Advantage", "one_liner": "Occupying a location in a value-graded space such that the position itself confers advantage — leverage, reach, defensibility, reaction-time — independent of the resources or force held at that location.", "page_ref": "prime:positional_advantage", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Defensible location -> structurally advantaged position.", "slug": "positional_advantage", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires a position whose topology or relation supplies advantage without proportional additional force."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Some locations are defensible or privileged.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Many actors can simultaneously occupy distinct advantaged positions, and the advantage need not be path-dependent.", "slug": "positional_advantage"}], "residual_id": "r:position_based_leverage_design:b049_a05_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b049_a05_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Path-dependent or scarce slots. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Path-dependent or scarce slots"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Many actors can simultaneously occupy distinct advantaged positions, and the advantage need not be path-dependent.", "slug": "positional_advantage"}], "normalized_requirement": "Valuable slots are scarce or path-dependent.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Valuable slots are scarce or path-dependent.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record changes position relative to an opponent or obstacle to gain advantage before direct commitment.", "role_mapping": "Contested field -> opponent-relative field; position -> maneuver location.", "slug": "maneuver", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b049_a05_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Contested field. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Contested field"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Maneuver", "one_liner": "Deliberately changing one's position in a state space whose positions differ in advantage, so the new position confers advantage without a direct contest of resources.", "page_ref": "prime:maneuver", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Contested field -> opponent-relative field; position -> maneuver location.", "slug": "maneuver", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record changes position relative to an opponent or obstacle to gain advantage before direct commitment."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The position lies in a contested field.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 49, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-049", "ledger_sha256": "a54629090ff96c10a23ba2e672d91d9818616e397e8d28216e65745528896750"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Position-Momentum Duality in Quantum Systems", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:position_momentum_duality_in_quantum_systems", "slug": "position_momentum_duality_in_quantum_systems"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is over-independent specification. A design asks for a sharp value, reliable readout, or strong guarantee in one representation while also asking for incompatible certainty in the paired representation. Without an explicit envelope, the team may optimize the easy-to-see side and leave hidden costs in the other side.\n\nThe problem also appears when measurement is treated as passive. In this archetype, observation or intervention can change what is being observed, so the measurement method belongs inside the design rather than outside it.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A design, analysis, or measurement task treats paired variables as if their precision and observability were independent. This produces requirements that cannot be physically or structurally satisfied, measurements that disturb the state they are meant to reveal, or decisions that optimize one representation while creating hidden errors in the conjugate representation."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires a paired coordinate relation such as Fourier-dual position and momentum.", "role_mapping": "Variable pair -> conjugate variables; transform relation -> dual basis.", "slug": "conjugate_variables", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b049_a06_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The domain contains a genuine conjugate, dual, transform-pair, or mutually constraining variable pair. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The domain contains a genuine conjugate, dual, transform-pair, or mutually constraining variable pair."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Conjugate Variables", "one_liner": "Interlinked variable pairs.", "page_ref": "prime:conjugate_variables", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Variable pair -> conjugate variables; transform relation -> dual basis.", "slug": "conjugate_variables", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires a paired coordinate relation such as Fourier-dual position and momentum."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The domain contains a genuine conjugate, transform-pair, or mutually constraining variable pair.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires reciprocal localization across a conjugate pair.", "role_mapping": "Precision in one -> localization; paired spread -> conjugate delocalization.", "slug": "conjugate_variables", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The exact record requires noncommuting observables whose attainable joint precision is bounded.", "role_mapping": "Variable pair -> conjugate observables; precision tradeoff -> complementarity bound.", "slug": "conjugate_observable_complementarity", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b049_a06_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Precision in one variable changes the attainable precision, spread, or disturbance in the paired variable. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Precision in one variable changes the attainable precision, spread, or disturbance in the paired variable."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Conjugate Variables", "one_liner": "Interlinked variable pairs.", "page_ref": "prime:conjugate_variables", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Precision in one -> localization; paired spread -> conjugate delocalization.", "slug": "conjugate_variables", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires reciprocal localization across a conjugate pair."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Conjugate-Observable Complementarity", "one_liner": "Certain observable pairs cannot be jointly specified to arbitrary precision because sharpening one structurally blurs its conjugate — a built-in trade-off of the system, not a measurement limitation.", "page_ref": "prime:conjugate_observable_complementarity", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Variable pair -> conjugate observables; precision tradeoff -> complementarity bound.", "slug": "conjugate_observable_complementarity", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires noncommuting observables whose attainable joint precision is bounded."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Precision in one variable constrains attainable precision or spread in its paired variable.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record represents one state through transform-linked conjugate coordinates.", "role_mapping": "State -> represented object; bases -> conjugate coordinate representations.", "slug": "conjugate_variables", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b049_a06_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The same state can be represented in two complementary bases that answer different practical questions. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The same state can be represented in two complementary bases that answer different practical questions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Conjugate Variables", "one_liner": "Interlinked variable pairs.", "page_ref": "prime:conjugate_variables", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "State -> represented object; bases -> conjugate coordinate representations.", "slug": "conjugate_variables", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record represents one state through transform-linked conjugate coordinates."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The same state has complementary bases that answer different practical questions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires the act of observation or measurement to alter the state being observed.", "role_mapping": "Measurement -> observation; state disturbance -> observer-induced change.", "slug": "observer_effect", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b049_a06_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Observation, measurement, or intervention can disturb the system being observed. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Observation, measurement, or intervention can disturb the system being observed."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Observer Effect", "one_liner": "Observation alters system.", "page_ref": "prime:observer_effect", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Measurement -> observation; state disturbance -> observer-induced change.", "slug": "observer_effect", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires the act of observation or measurement to alter the state being observed."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Observation, measurement, or intervention can disturb the observed system.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A conjugate pair supplies a transform relation but an arbitrary claim need not be invariant under translation between bases.", "slug": "conjugate_variables"}], "residual_id": "r:position_momentum_duality_in_quantum_systems:b049_a06_c7", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b049_a06_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Claims need to remain valid when translated from one representation into the other. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Claims need to remain valid when translated from one representation into the other."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A conjugate pair supplies a transform relation but an arbitrary claim need not be invariant under translation between bases.", "slug": "conjugate_variables"}], "normalized_requirement": "Claims must remain valid when translated between complementary representations.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Claims must remain valid when translated between complementary representations.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The task requires choosing what to measure, estimate, localize, encode, or control.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when a task asks for information, control, or precision across variables that cannot be treated as independent. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: The task requires choosing what to measure, estimate, localize, encode, or control. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The task requires choosing what to measure, estimate, localize, encode, or control.", "Use this archetype when a task asks for information, control, or precision across variables that cannot be treated as independent."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "The task requires choosing what to measure, estimate, localize, encode, or control."}, {"display_text": "The design must report bounded uncertainty rather than a single unconstrained estimate.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The design tension is not how to eliminate uncertainty, but how to allocate, use, and disclose it without violating the conjugate relationship. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: The design must report bounded uncertainty rather than a single unconstrained estimate. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The design must report bounded uncertainty rather than a single unconstrained estimate.", "The design tension is not how to eliminate uncertainty, but how to allocate, use, and disclose it without violating the conjugate relationship."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The design must report bounded uncertainty rather than a single unconstrained estimate."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 49, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-049", "ledger_sha256": "a54629090ff96c10a23ba2e672d91d9818616e397e8d28216e65745528896750"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Post-Encoding Trace Stabilization", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:post_encoding_trace_stabilization", "slug": "post_encoding_trace_stabilization"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A trace has been formed but has not yet become stable. It can be overwritten by similar inputs, lost through decay, blurred into adjacent material, or mistaken for durable knowledge because immediate recall still works. The system needs a governed post-encoding interval that converts temporary availability into reliable later access.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A trace has been formed but has not yet become stable. It can be overwritten by similar inputs, lost through decay, blurred into adjacent material, or mistaken for durable knowledge because immediate recall still works. The system needs a governed post-encoding interval that converts temporary availability into reliable later access."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record begins with a newly encoded fragile trace and converts it into durable later memory.", "role_mapping": "Encoded item -> new trace; later use -> durable store.", "slug": "memory_consolidation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b049_a07_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A lesson, episode, skill, decision, model state, or representation has just been encoded and will matter later. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A lesson, episode, skill, decision, model state, or representation has just been encoded and will matter later."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Memory Consolidation", "one_liner": "Converting a newly encoded trace from a fragile, overwritable form into a durable, interference-resistant one through a slow post-encoding stabilization process.", "page_ref": "prime:memory_consolidation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Encoded item -> new trace; later use -> durable store.", "slug": "memory_consolidation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record begins with a newly encoded fragile trace and converts it into durable later memory."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A newly encoded lesson, episode, skill, decision, state, or representation must remain available later.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record distinguishes a fragile newly encoded trace from its later interference-resistant consolidated form.", "role_mapping": "Immediate recall -> fragile availability; durable retention -> consolidated trace.", "slug": "memory_consolidation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b049_a07_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Immediate recall or performance is not enough evidence of durable retention. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Immediate recall or performance is not enough evidence of durable retention."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Memory Consolidation", "one_liner": "Converting a newly encoded trace from a fragile, overwritable form into a durable, interference-resistant one through a slow post-encoding stabilization process.", "page_ref": "prime:memory_consolidation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Immediate recall -> fragile availability; durable retention -> consolidated trace.", "slug": "memory_consolidation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record distinguishes a fragile newly encoded trace from its later interference-resistant consolidated form."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Immediate recall or performance does not establish durable retention.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires a fragile trace vulnerable to overwriting and interference before slow stabilization.", "role_mapping": "Subsequent inputs -> interference; trace -> fragile memory.", "slug": "memory_consolidation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b049_a07_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The trace is vulnerable to similar subsequent inputs, task switching, stress, sleep loss, competing writes, or organizational churn. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The trace is vulnerable to similar subsequent inputs, task switching, stress, sleep loss, competing writes, or organizational churn."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Memory Consolidation", "one_liner": "Converting a newly encoded trace from a fragile, overwritable form into a durable, interference-resistant one through a slow post-encoding stabilization process.", "page_ref": "prime:memory_consolidation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Subsequent inputs -> interference; trace -> fragile memory.", "slug": "memory_consolidation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires a fragile trace vulnerable to overwriting and interference before slow stabilization."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The trace is vulnerable to interference, competing writes, stress, sleep loss, switching, or churn.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A low-interference or offline interval can be shaped after encoding.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The system needs a governed post-encoding interval that converts temporary availability into reliable later access. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: A low-interference or offline interval can be shaped after encoding. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A low-interference or offline interval can be shaped after encoding.", "The system needs a governed post-encoding interval that converts temporary availability into reliable later access."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "A low-interference or offline interval can be shaped after encoding."}, {"display_text": "Replay, reactivation, integration, review, rest, or validation can be applied without turning the case into pure retrieval practice.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: Replay, reactivation, integration, review, rest, or validation can be applied without turning the case into pure retrieval practice. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Replay, reactivation, integration, review, rest, or validation can be applied without turning the case into pure retrieval practice."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Replay, reactivation, integration, review, rest, or validation can be applied without turning the case into pure retrieval practice."}, {"display_text": "Later use would be costly or unsafe if the trace silently decays or confabulates.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Later use would be costly or unsafe if the trace silently decays or confabulates. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Later use would be costly or unsafe if the trace silently decays or confabulates."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Later use would be costly or unsafe if the trace silently decays or confabulates."}, {"display_text": "The system can run delayed probes, transfer checks, restore checks, or behavior checks before depending on the trace.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: The system can run delayed probes, transfer checks, restore checks, or behavior checks before depending on the trace. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The system can run delayed probes, transfer checks, restore checks, or behavior checks before depending on the trace."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "The system can run delayed probes, transfer checks, restore checks, or behavior checks before depending on the trace."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 49, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-049", "ledger_sha256": "a54629090ff96c10a23ba2e672d91d9818616e397e8d28216e65745528896750"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Pragmatic Context Alignment", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:pragmatic_context_alignment", "slug": "pragmatic_context_alignment"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A sender, designer, teacher, institution, system, or agent assumes that the encoded content of a signal carries the intended meaning by itself, while recipients infer meaning from context. The result is technically correct wording that is misread, overread, underread, treated as irrelevant, taken as hostile, interpreted under the wrong role, or acted on in the wrong situation.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A sender, designer, teacher, institution, system, or agent assumes that the encoded content of a signal carries the intended meaning by itself, while recipients infer meaning from context. The result is technically correct wording that is misread, overread, underread, treated as irrelevant, taken as hostile, interpreted under the wrong role, or acted on in the wrong situation."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires expressions whose reference depends on speaker, place, time, or discourse context.", "role_mapping": "This/now/we -> deictic expression; local situation -> context anchor.", "slug": "deixis", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b049_a08_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Words such as “this,” “now,” “soon,” “approved,” “safe,” “required,” “we,” or “they” depend on context to resolve. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Words such as “this,” “now,” “soon,” “approved,” “safe,” “required,” “we,” or “they” depend on context to resolve."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Deixis", "one_liner": "Context-dependent meaning.", "page_ref": "prime:deixis", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "This/now/we -> deictic expression; local situation -> context anchor.", "slug": "deixis", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires expressions whose reference depends on speaker, place, time, or discourse context."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Indexical expressions depend on context to resolve their referent, time, authority, or group.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record studies and structures meaning contributed by use context beyond encoded semantics.", "role_mapping": "Literal wording -> semantics; implication and shared background -> pragmatic context.", "slug": "pragmatics", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b049_a08_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The intended meaning relies on implication, relevance, tone, politeness, presupposition, shared background, sequence, or relationship rather than literal wording alone. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The intended meaning relies on implication, relevance, tone, politeness, presupposition, shared background, sequence, or relationship rather than literal wording alone."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Pragmatics", "one_liner": "What a signal means in context is the joint product of its literal content and patterned contextual machinery, not just what the signal literally encodes.", "page_ref": "prime:pragmatics", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Literal wording -> semantics; implication and shared background -> pragmatic context.", "slug": "pragmatics", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record studies and structures meaning contributed by use context beyond encoded semantics."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Intended meaning depends on implication, relevance, tone, presupposition, shared background, sequence, or relationship beyond literal wording.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Pragmatic meaning can matter within one stable conversation and need not cross contexts.", "slug": "pragmatics"}], "residual_id": "r:pragmatic_context_alignment:b049_a08_c4", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b049_a08_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A message moves between contexts, such as meeting to record, expert to public, policy to implementation, or chat to audit trail. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A message moves between contexts, such as meeting to record, expert to public, policy to implementation, or chat to audit trail."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Pragmatic meaning can matter within one stable conversation and need not cross contexts.", "slug": "pragmatics"}], "normalized_requirement": "A message moves between contexts such as meeting to record, expert to public, policy to implementation, or chat to audit trail.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A message moves between contexts such as meeting to record, expert to public, policy to implementation, or chat to audit trail.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A context-dependent utterance can be understood immediately by every recipient.", "slug": "pragmatics"}], "residual_id": "r:pragmatic_context_alignment:b049_a08_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b049_a08_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Recipients keep asking clarification questions even though the literal text appears correct. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Recipients keep asking clarification questions even though the literal text appears correct."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A context-dependent utterance can be understood immediately by every recipient.", "slug": "pragmatics"}], "normalized_requirement": "Recipients repeatedly request clarification although the literal text appears correct.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Recipients repeatedly request clarification although the literal text appears correct.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A signal must be understood across roles, cultures, channels, organizations, expertise levels, legal contexts, or high-stakes action settings.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Signals need compression, but context supplies much of the decompression key; when context is implicit, literal correctness can coexist with pragmatic failure. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: A signal must be understood across roles, cultures, channels, organizations, expertise levels, legal contexts, or high-stakes action settings. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A signal must be understood across roles, cultures, channels, organizations, expertise levels, legal contexts, or high-stakes action settings.", "Signals need compression, but context supplies much of the decompression key; when context is implicit, literal correctness can coexist with pragmatic failure."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "A signal must be understood across roles, cultures, channels, organizations, expertise levels, legal contexts, or high-stakes action settings."}, {"display_text": "A system, interface, sign, form, notification, or instruction must preserve meaning when the sender is absent.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A sender, designer, teacher, institution, system, or agent assumes that the encoded content of a signal carries the intended meaning by itself, while recipients infer meaning from context. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: A system, interface, sign, form, notification, or instruction must preserve meaning when the sender is absent. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A system, interface, sign, form, notification, or instruction must preserve meaning when the sender is absent.", "A sender, designer, teacher, institution, system, or agent assumes that the encoded content of a signal carries the intended meaning by itself, while recipients infer meaning from context."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "A system, interface, sign, form, notification, or instruction must preserve meaning when the sender is absent."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 49, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-049", "ledger_sha256": "a54629090ff96c10a23ba2e672d91d9818616e397e8d28216e65745528896750"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Precedent-Guided Decision Governance", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:precedent_guided_decision_governance", "slug": "precedent_guided_decision_governance"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Without precedent governance, recurrent decisions oscillate between reinvention and inertia. Reinvention produces unequal treatment, duplicated analysis, and arbitrary dependence on the assigned decision maker. Inertia reproduces an earlier answer even when its facts, authority, rationale, evidence, or context no longer fit.\n\nThe hidden difficulty is that similarity is not self-executing. Cases can resemble each other on visible features while differing on the fact that actually supports the rule. Conversely, decision makers can manufacture narrow differences to avoid a precedent they dislike. The archetype makes the dimensions of analogy, authority, and departure inspectable.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system makes recurrent consequential decisions but lacks a reliable way to carry reasons and constraints from earlier cases into later ones. Decision makers either improvise anew, creating unequal treatment and duplicated reasoning, or invoke prior outcomes without checking authority, factual similarity, rationale, later developments, or justified exceptions. The result is inconsistency, hidden path dependence, selective precedent citation, stale rules, and weak accountability for departures."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record governs later cases by relevant prior decisions, which presupposes recurring comparable cases.", "role_mapping": "Recurring cases -> later disputes; prior outcome -> precedent.", "slug": "precedent_stare_decisis", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b049_a09_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Similar disputes, approvals, exceptions, sanctions, benefits, or operational incidents recur. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Similar disputes, approvals, exceptions, sanctions, benefits, or operational incidents recur."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Precedent (Stare Decisis)", "one_liner": "Past decisions guide future.", "page_ref": "prime:precedent_stare_decisis", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Recurring cases -> later disputes; prior outcome -> precedent.", "slug": "precedent_stare_decisis", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record governs later cases by relevant prior decisions, which presupposes recurring comparable cases."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Similar disputes, approvals, exceptions, sanctions, benefits, or incidents recur.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record constrains like cases by authoritative prior holdings to provide consistency and reliance.", "role_mapping": "Comparable cases -> materially similar facts; comparable treatment -> precedent constraint.", "slug": "precedent_stare_decisis", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b049_a09_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use it when a system repeatedly decides comparable disputes, approvals, exceptions, sanctions, benefits, incidents, or classifications and stakeholders reasonably expect like cases to receive like treatment. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Stakeholders reasonably expect comparable cases to receive comparable treatment.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders reasonably expect comparable cases to receive comparable treatment.", "Use it when a system repeatedly decides comparable disputes, approvals, exceptions, sanctions, benefits, incidents, or classifications and stakeholders reasonably expect like cases to receive like treatment."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Precedent (Stare Decisis)", "one_liner": "Past decisions guide future.", "page_ref": "prime:precedent_stare_decisis", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Comparable cases -> materially similar facts; comparable treatment -> precedent constraint.", "slug": "precedent_stare_decisis", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record constrains like cases by authoritative prior holdings to provide consistency and reliance."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Stakeholders reasonably expect comparable cases to receive comparable treatment.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record carries a prior holding and its ratio or rationale into later fact-sensitive decisions.", "role_mapping": "Useful reasoning -> ratio; incomplete general rule -> case-specific holding.", "slug": "precedent_stare_decisis", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b049_a09_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Prior decisions contain useful reasoning that is not fully captured in a general rule. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Prior decisions contain useful reasoning that is not fully captured in a general rule."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Precedent (Stare Decisis)", "one_liner": "Past decisions guide future.", "page_ref": "prime:precedent_stare_decisis", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Useful reasoning -> ratio; incomplete general rule -> case-specific holding.", "slug": "precedent_stare_decisis", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record carries a prior holding and its ratio or rationale into later fact-sensitive decisions."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Prior decisions contain useful reasoning not fully captured in a general rule.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Precedent can govern a precisely specified rule and need not arise from ambiguity or discretion.", "slug": "precedent_stare_decisis"}], "residual_id": "r:precedent_guided_decision_governance:b049_a09_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b049_a09_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when general rules leave interpretive gaps, prior decisions contain reasoning not captured in policy, and abrupt unexplained change would undermine reliance or legitimacy. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Existing rules contain ambiguity, exceptions, open-textured standards, or discretionary gaps.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Existing rules contain ambiguity, exceptions, open-textured standards, or discretionary gaps.", "It is especially useful when general rules leave interpretive gaps, prior decisions contain reasoning not captured in policy, and abrupt unexplained change would undermine reliance or legitimacy."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Precedent can govern a precisely specified rule and need not arise from ambiguity or discretion.", "slug": "precedent_stare_decisis"}], "normalized_requirement": "Existing rules contain ambiguity, exceptions, open-textured standards, or discretionary gaps.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Existing rules contain ambiguity, exceptions, open-textured standards, or discretionary gaps.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record permits distinguishing materially different facts and formally overruling with reasons while constraining arbitrary departure.", "role_mapping": "Later case -> current case; earlier approach -> precedent; justified change -> distinction or overruling.", "slug": "precedent_stare_decisis", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b049_a09_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A later case may require distinguishing or changing an earlier approach without arbitrary departure. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A later case may require distinguishing or changing an earlier approach without arbitrary departure."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Precedent (Stare Decisis)", "one_liner": "Past decisions guide future.", "page_ref": "prime:precedent_stare_decisis", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Later case -> current case; earlier approach -> precedent; justified change -> distinction or overruling.", "slug": "precedent_stare_decisis", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record permits distinguishing materially different facts and formally overruling with reasons while constraining arbitrary departure."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A later case may need to distinguish or change an earlier approach without arbitrary departure.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A new or obscure precedent can have no settled reliance interest.", "slug": "precedent_stare_decisis"}], "residual_id": "r:precedent_guided_decision_governance:b049_a09_c7", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b049_a09_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Consistency, predictability, and reliance favor following settled decisions. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Reliance on settled practice makes abrupt unannounced change costly or unfair.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Reliance on settled practice makes abrupt unannounced change costly or unfair.", "Consistency, predictability, and reliance favor following settled decisions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A new or obscure precedent can have no settled reliance interest.", "slug": "precedent_stare_decisis"}], "normalized_requirement": "Reliance on settled practice makes abrupt unannounced change costly or unfair.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Reliance on settled practice makes abrupt unannounced change costly or unfair.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Decision authority is hierarchical, federated, or split across bodies with different weight.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Decision makers either improvise anew, creating unequal treatment and duplicated reasoning, or invoke prior outcomes without checking authority, factual similarity, rationale, later developments, or justified exceptions. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Decision authority is hierarchical, federated, or split across bodies with different weight. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Decision authority is hierarchical, federated, or split across bodies with different weight.", "Decision makers either improvise anew, creating unequal treatment and duplicated reasoning, or invoke prior outcomes without checking authority, factual similarity, rationale, later developments, or justified exceptions."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Decision authority is hierarchical, federated, or split across bodies with different weight."}, {"display_text": "The corpus is large enough that selective memory or retrieval bias can shape outcomes.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "If the old outcome is unexplained, biased, secret, or invalid, its repetition is not governance. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The corpus is large enough that selective memory or retrieval bias can shape outcomes. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The corpus is large enough that selective memory or retrieval bias can shape outcomes.", "If the old outcome is unexplained, biased, secret, or invalid, its repetition is not governance."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 8, "text": "The corpus is large enough that selective memory or retrieval bias can shape outcomes."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 49, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-049", "ledger_sha256": "a54629090ff96c10a23ba2e672d91d9818616e397e8d28216e65745528896750"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Precomputation / Prefetching", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:precomputation_and_prefetching", "slug": "precomputation_and_prefetching"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 3 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is delayed start under predictable need. A future demand pattern is visible enough to act on, but the system waits until the moment of need to compute, retrieve, assemble, approve, or schedule. This creates avoidable latency and peak-time overload.\n\nThe same structure appears in software systems that wait to compute expensive views, organizations that wait to draft common approvals until a case arrives, logistics systems that wait to move supplies until a forecasted event is underway, and educators who wait to prepare support until common misunderstandings appear in the room.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system waits until demand arrives to perform work that could have been prepared earlier. The result is avoidable latency, overload at the moment of need, repeated startup cost, or rushed decisions during time-sensitive windows."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A cache can react only after a first unpredictable request and need not forecast future demand.", "slug": "caching"}], "residual_id": "r:precomputation_and_prefetching:b049_a10_c1", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b049_a10_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Future demand is predictable enough. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["future_demand_is_predictable_enough"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A cache can react only after a first unpredictable request and need not forecast future demand.", "slug": "caching"}], "normalized_requirement": "Future demand is predictable enough to prepare for.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Future demand is predictable enough to prepare for.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record performs expensive or combinatorial work before demand and stores a directly usable result.", "role_mapping": "On-demand work -> expensive computation; latency -> demand-time cost.", "slug": "precomputation_and_materialization", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b049_a10_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: On demand latency or setup cost is material. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["on_demand_latency_or_setup_cost_is_material"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Precomputation and Materialization", "one_liner": "Perform expensive or combinatorial work before demand and store its result as a directly usable artifact, trading build and update cost plus possible staleness for cheap, predictable use-time access.", "page_ref": "prime:precomputation_and_materialization", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "On-demand work -> expensive computation; latency -> demand-time cost.", "slug": "precomputation_and_materialization", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record performs expensive or combinatorial work before demand and stores a directly usable result."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "On-demand computation, setup, or retrieval has material cost or latency.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A materialized result can remain valid indefinitely when its source and query are immutable.", "slug": "precomputation_and_materialization"}], "residual_id": "r:precomputation_and_prefetching:b049_a10_c4", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b049_a10_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Prepared outputs have validity windows. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["prepared_outputs_have_validity_windows"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A materialized result can remain valid indefinitely when its source and query are immutable.", "slug": "precomputation_and_materialization"}], "normalized_requirement": "Prepared outputs have finite or declared validity windows.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Prepared outputs have finite or declared validity windows.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Preparation cost is bounded.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source states: Preparation cost is bounded. The normalized feasibility condition is: Preparation cost is bounded. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["preparation_cost_is_bounded"]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "preparation_cost_is_bounded"}, {"display_text": "Activation can be routed reliably.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source states: Activation can be routed reliably. The normalized feasibility condition is: Activation can be routed reliably. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["activation_can_be_routed_reliably"]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "activation_can_be_routed_reliably"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 49, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-049", "ledger_sha256": "a54629090ff96c10a23ba2e672d91d9818616e397e8d28216e65745528896750"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Predicate Criterion Formalization", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:predicate_criterion_formalization", "slug": "predicate_criterion_formalization"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system needs to decide whether an object, case, state, action, or claim has some property, but the property is left as ordinary-language intention, unstated intuition, inherited practice, or scattered examples. Without an explicit truth-valued criterion, different actors apply different tests, edge cases drift, membership boundaries become hidden, and downstream rules, constraints, classifications, queries, proofs, or interventions inherit the ambiguity.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system needs to decide whether an object, case, state, action, or claim has some property, but the property is left as ordinary-language intention, unstated intuition, inherited practice, or scattered examples. Without an explicit truth-valued criterion, different actors apply different tests, edge cases drift, membership boundaries become hidden, and downstream rules, constraints, classifications, queries, proofs, or interventions inherit the ambiguity."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record is a truth-valued expression over a candidate object or tuple.", "role_mapping": "Candidate -> predicate argument; named property -> truth condition.", "slug": "predicate", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b049_a11_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A boundary, rule, filter, gate, query, claim, or eligibility standard depends on whether a candidate satisfies a named property. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A boundary, rule, filter, gate, query, claim, or eligibility standard depends on whether a candidate satisfies a named property."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Predicate", "one_liner": "A testable yes-or-no property of an object, returning a truth value.", "page_ref": "prime:predicate", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Candidate -> predicate argument; named property -> truth condition.", "slug": "predicate", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record is a truth-valued expression over a candidate object or tuple."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A rule, gate, query, claim, or eligibility boundary depends on whether a candidate has a named property.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A predicate can be fully explicit and mechanically decidable with no disagreement.", "slug": "predicate"}], "residual_id": "r:predicate_criterion_formalization:b049_a11_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b049_a11_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: People disagree about whether a case counts because the operative condition is implicit or example-driven. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["People disagree about whether a case counts because the operative condition is implicit or example-driven."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A predicate can be fully explicit and mechanically decidable with no disagreement.", "slug": "predicate"}], "normalized_requirement": "Cases are disputed because the operative condition is implicit or example-driven.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Cases are disputed because the operative condition is implicit or example-driven.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record defines a reusable truth-valued condition that can be applied to arbitrary admissible arguments.", "role_mapping": "Reusable sub-test -> predicate; cases -> arguments.", "slug": "predicate", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b049_a11_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A classification, constraint, or decision rule needs a reusable sub-test rather than a one-off judgment. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A classification, constraint, or decision rule needs a reusable sub-test rather than a one-off judgment."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Predicate", "one_liner": "A testable yes-or-no property of an object, returning a truth value.", "page_ref": "prime:predicate", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Reusable sub-test -> predicate; cases -> arguments.", "slug": "predicate", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record defines a reusable truth-valued condition that can be applied to arbitrary admissible arguments."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A classification, constraint, or decision requires a reusable sub-test rather than a one-off judgment.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A predicate can be applied where both error types are equally cheap or impossible.", "slug": "predicate"}], "residual_id": "r:predicate_criterion_formalization:b049_a11_c5", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b049_a11_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: False positives and false negatives have materially different consequences and must be treated deliberately. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["False positives and false negatives have materially different consequences and must be treated deliberately."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A predicate can be applied where both error types are equally cheap or impossible.", "slug": "predicate"}], "normalized_requirement": "False positives and false negatives have materially different consequences.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "False positives and false negatives have materially different consequences.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Predicates compose under logical connectives and can be bound by quantifiers.", "role_mapping": "Condition -> predicate; and/or/not -> Boolean composition.", "slug": "predicate", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The exact record binds a predicate over a domain with all, some, none, or cardinal scope.", "role_mapping": "All/some/none -> quantifier; condition -> bound predicate.", "slug": "quantifier", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b049_a11_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The condition may be composed with other conditions through and, or, not, all, some, none, threshold, or exception logic. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The condition may be composed with other conditions through and, or, not, all, some, none, threshold, or exception logic."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Predicate", "one_liner": "A testable yes-or-no property of an object, returning a truth value.", "page_ref": "prime:predicate", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Condition -> predicate; and/or/not -> Boolean composition.", "slug": "predicate", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Predicates compose under logical connectives and can be bound by quantifiers."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Quantifier", "one_liner": "Specifies the scope of a claim over a domain — all, some, none, most, or exactly N.", "page_ref": "prime:quantifier", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "All/some/none -> quantifier; condition -> bound predicate.", "slug": "quantifier", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record binds a predicate over a domain with all, some, none, or cardinal scope."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The condition may compose with other conditions through Boolean, quantifier, threshold, or exception logic.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires a claim to forbid at least one admissible observation that would force its rejection.", "role_mapping": "Claim -> hypothesis; refuting observation -> falsifier.", "slug": "falsifiability", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b049_a11_c8", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A claim needs to expose what would refute it, not merely state what would support it. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A claim needs to expose what would refute it, not merely state what would support it."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Falsifiability", "one_liner": "A claim is scientific only if it could in principle be empirically refuted.", "page_ref": "prime:falsifiability", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Claim -> hypothesis; refuting observation -> falsifier.", "slug": "falsifiability", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires a claim to forbid at least one admissible observation that would force its rejection."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A claim must expose observations that would refute it.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [8], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The same condition will be applied repeatedly by multiple actors, systems, reviewers, or time periods.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: The same condition will be applied repeatedly by multiple actors, systems, reviewers, or time periods. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The same condition will be applied repeatedly by multiple actors, systems, reviewers, or time periods."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The same condition will be applied repeatedly by multiple actors, systems, reviewers, or time periods."}, {"display_text": "Evidence can be missing, stale, noisy, contested, or impossible to observe directly.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Evidence can be missing, stale, noisy, contested, or impossible to observe directly. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Evidence can be missing, stale, noisy, contested, or impossible to observe directly."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "Evidence can be missing, stale, noisy, contested, or impossible to observe directly."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 49, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-049", "ledger_sha256": "a54629090ff96c10a23ba2e672d91d9818616e397e8d28216e65745528896750"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Prediction-Error Learning Calibration", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:prediction_error_learning_calibration", "slug": "prediction_error_learning_calibration"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "An adapting person, organization, algorithm, or institution updates from outcome magnitude, applause, failure, punishment, revenue, score, or metric movement without separating what actually happened from what was already expected. Expected successes keep being over-reinforced, expected failures keep being over-punished, and genuinely informative surprises are either missed or overreacted to.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "An adapting person, organization, algorithm, or institution updates from outcome magnitude, applause, failure, punishment, revenue, score, or metric movement without separating what actually happened from what was already expected. Expected successes keep being over-reinforced, expected failures keep being over-punished, and genuinely informative surprises are either missed or overreacted to."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record uses signed reward surprise to update value and future action selection.", "role_mapping": "Recurring action -> chosen behavior; consequence -> reward outcome; future probability -> learned value.", "slug": "reward_prediction_error", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b049_a12_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A system has recurring actions, cues, policies, or choices whose future probability is changed by consequences. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A system has recurring actions, cues, policies, or choices whose future probability is changed by consequences."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Reward Prediction Error", "one_liner": "The signed difference between received and expected reward or value becomes a teaching signal for updating value estimates, policies, and reward-linked behavior.", "page_ref": "prime:reward_prediction_error", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Recurring action -> chosen behavior; consequence -> reward outcome; future probability -> learned value.", "slug": "reward_prediction_error", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record uses signed reward surprise to update value and future action selection."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Recurring choices have their future probability changed by consequences.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid reward-prediction-error system explicitly uses the prior expectation in its update.", "slug": "reward_prediction_error"}], "residual_id": "r:prediction_error_learning_calibration:b049_a12_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b049_a12_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Participants can state or estimate what outcome was expected before the outcome arrives, but that expectation is not recorded or used in the update. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Participants can state or estimate what outcome was expected before the outcome arrives, but that expectation is not recorded or used in the update."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid reward-prediction-error system explicitly uses the prior expectation in its update.", "slug": "reward_prediction_error"}], "normalized_requirement": "An expected outcome can be estimated before arrival but is not recorded or used in updating.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "An expected outcome can be estimated before arrival but is not recorded or used in updating.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact prime already subtracts expected reward from observed reward.", "slug": "reward_prediction_error"}], "residual_id": "r:prediction_error_learning_calibration:b049_a12_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b049_a12_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Feedback arrives as raw reward, penalty, score, grade, metric, approval, revenue, incident count, or performance result rather than as a prediction-adjusted signal. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Feedback arrives as raw reward, penalty, score, grade, metric, approval, revenue, incident count, or performance result rather than as a prediction-adjusted signal."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact prime already subtracts expected reward from observed reward.", "slug": "reward_prediction_error"}], "normalized_requirement": "Feedback arrives and is used as raw outcome rather than prediction-adjusted signal.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Feedback arrives and is used as raw outcome rather than prediction-adjusted signal.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A reward prediction error can be driven by the intended causal cue and need not include any shortcut feature.", "slug": "reward_prediction_error"}], "residual_id": "r:prediction_error_learning_calibration:b049_a12_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b049_a12_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A model, team, or learner is vulnerable to shortcut learning because incidental cues sometimes predict reward better than the intended structure. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A model, team, or learner is vulnerable to shortcut learning because incidental cues sometimes predict reward better than the intended structure."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A reward prediction error can be driven by the intended causal cue and need not include any shortcut feature.", "slug": "reward_prediction_error"}], "normalized_requirement": "Incidental cues sometimes predict reward better than the intended structure, creating shortcut-learning risk.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Incidental cues sometimes predict reward better than the intended structure, creating shortcut-learning risk.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record is a signed difference between obtained and expected reward, with positive and negative errors driving different updates.", "role_mapping": "Positive/negative surprise -> signed error; behavioral effect -> value update.", "slug": "reward_prediction_error", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b049_a12_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Positive surprises and negative surprises have different behavioral effects and must be distinguished rather than collapsed into generic success or failure. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Positive surprises and negative surprises have different behavioral effects and must be distinguished rather than collapsed into generic success or failure."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Reward Prediction Error", "one_liner": "The signed difference between received and expected reward or value becomes a teaching signal for updating value estimates, policies, and reward-linked behavior.", "page_ref": "prime:reward_prediction_error", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Positive/negative surprise -> signed error; behavioral effect -> value update.", "slug": "reward_prediction_error", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record is a signed difference between obtained and expected reward, with positive and negative errors driving different updates."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Positive and negative surprises have different behavioral effects and must remain signed.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The environment is noisy enough that single outcomes can mislead, but structured deviations from expectation still carry learning value.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Raw outcomes are easier to observe and explain than prediction errors, yet raw-outcome learning rewards noise, salience, luck, and existing expectations. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The environment is noisy enough that single outcomes can mislead, but structured deviations from expectation still carry learning value. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The environment is noisy enough that single outcomes can mislead, but structured deviations from expectation still carry learning value.", "Raw outcomes are easier to observe and explain than prediction errors, yet raw-outcome learning rewards noise, salience, luck, and existing expectations."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The environment is noisy enough that single outcomes can mislead, but structured deviations from expectation still carry learning value."}, {"display_text": "The system must adapt without allowing every pleasant or painful outcome to dominate memory, policy, or incentives.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "An adapting person, organization, algorithm, or institution updates from outcome magnitude, applause, failure, punishment, revenue, score, or metric movement without separating what actually happened from what was already expected. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: The system must adapt without allowing every pleasant or painful outcome to dominate memory, policy, or incentives. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The system must adapt without allowing every pleasant or painful outcome to dominate memory, policy, or incentives.", "An adapting person, organization, algorithm, or institution updates from outcome magnitude, applause, failure, punishment, revenue, score, or metric movement without separating what actually happened from what was already expected."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The system must adapt without allowing every pleasant or painful outcome to dominate memory, policy, or incentives."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 49, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-049", "ledger_sha256": "a54629090ff96c10a23ba2e672d91d9818616e397e8d28216e65745528896750"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Predictive-Cue Wayfinding Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:predictive_cue_wayfinding_design", "slug": "predictive_cue_wayfinding_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Agents must find, evaluate, or traverse a target without full knowledge of the space. They rely on local cues, but those cues may be too weak, too generic, stale, overloaded, manipulative, or poorly correlated with destination value. The result is inefficient search, wrong turns, abandonment, false confidence, and degraded trust.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Agents must find, evaluate, or traverse a target without full knowledge of the space. They rely on local cues, but those cues may be too weak, too generic, stale, overloaded, manipulative, or poorly correlated with destination value. The result is inefficient search, wrong turns, abandonment, false confidence, and degraded trust."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Information scent can compare one available link with the background without requiring multiple traversable paths.", "slug": "information_scent"}], "residual_id": "r:predictive_cue_wayfinding_design:b049_a13_c1", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b049_a13_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The space has multiple paths, categories, links, routes, options, documents, screens, procedures, or next actions. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The space has multiple paths, categories, links, routes, options, documents, screens, procedures, or next actions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Information scent can compare one available link with the background without requiring multiple traversable paths.", "slug": "information_scent"}], "normalized_requirement": "A space offers multiple paths, categories, links, routes, screens, procedures, or next actions.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A space offers multiple paths, categories, links, routes, screens, procedures, or next actions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires locally available cues that estimate the value of remote information before traversal.", "role_mapping": "Agent -> information seeker; destination -> remote content; local cue -> scent.", "slug": "information_scent", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b049_a13_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Agents cannot inspect all destinations before choosing and must infer value from local cues. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Agents cannot inspect all destinations before choosing and must infer value from local cues."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Information Scent", "one_liner": "An agent navigates a partially-known space by reading local cues at decision points that predict the value of going further, with cue-destination correlation governing traversal efficiency.", "page_ref": "prime:information_scent", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Agent -> information seeker; destination -> remote content; local cue -> scent.", "slug": "information_scent", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires locally available cues that estimate the value of remote information before traversal."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Agents cannot inspect all destinations before choosing and infer value from local cues.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record defines cue quality by how well a proximal sign predicts the value and cost of following a path to remote content.", "role_mapping": "Cue -> proximal signal; destination value -> remote information payoff.", "slug": "information_scent", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b049_a13_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Success depends on whether the cue accurately predicts destination relevance, payoff, effort, risk, or next state. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Success depends on whether the cue accurately predicts destination relevance, payoff, effort, risk, or next state."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Information Scent", "one_liner": "An agent navigates a partially-known space by reading local cues at decision points that predict the value of going further, with cue-destination correlation governing traversal efficiency.", "page_ref": "prime:information_scent", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Cue -> proximal signal; destination value -> remote information payoff.", "slug": "information_scent", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record defines cue quality by how well a proximal sign predicts the value and cost of following a path to remote content."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Success depends on whether a local cue predicts destination relevance, payoff, effort, risk, or next state.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires a cue to retain its persuasive surface after the cue-outcome relation has broken.", "role_mapping": "Old label or preview -> cue; changed destination -> decoupled outcome.", "slug": "cue_outcome_decoupling", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The exact record requires environmental change to make an inherited once-adaptive cue guide agents toward a harmful outcome.", "role_mapping": "Old route cue -> inherited signal; changed environment -> novel context; wrong destination -> maladaptive response.", "slug": "evolutionary_trap", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b049_a13_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The environment changes, making old labels, route promises, or previews unreliable. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The environment changes, making old labels, route promises, or previews unreliable."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Cue Outcome Decoupling", "one_liner": "A cue that once reliably tracked an outcome has its coupling broken, while the cue-following behavior persists and grows more harmful the better it tracks the now-decoupled cue.", "page_ref": "prime:cue_outcome_decoupling", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Old label or preview -> cue; changed destination -> decoupled outcome.", "slug": "cue_outcome_decoupling", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires a cue to retain its persuasive surface after the cue-outcome relation has broken."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Evolutionary Trap", "one_liner": "An agent follows a once-reliable cue more eagerly the stronger it is, straight into harm, because the environment changed and the cue-value coupling broke while the cue-response did not.", "page_ref": "prime:evolutionary_trap", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Old route cue -> inherited signal; changed environment -> novel context; wrong destination -> maladaptive response.", "slug": "evolutionary_trap", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires environmental change to make an inherited once-adaptive cue guide agents toward a harmful outcome."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Environmental change makes inherited labels, route promises, or previews unreliable.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Labels, previews, landmarks, thumbnails, social signals, snippets, headings, or affordances influence traversal.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Labels, previews, landmarks, thumbnails, social signals, snippets, headings, or affordances influence traversal. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Labels, previews, landmarks, thumbnails, social signals, snippets, headings, or affordances influence traversal."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Labels, previews, landmarks, thumbnails, social signals, snippets, headings, or affordances influence traversal."}, {"display_text": "Users abandon, pogo-stick, loop, ask for help, choose attractive wrong paths, or miss valuable paths.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Users abandon, pogo-stick, loop, ask for help, choose attractive wrong paths, or miss valuable paths. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Users abandon, pogo-stick, loop, ask for help, choose attractive wrong paths, or miss valuable paths."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Users abandon, pogo-stick, loop, ask for help, choose attractive wrong paths, or miss valuable paths."}, {"display_text": "The cost of a wrong turn is nontrivial in time, attention, risk, safety, trust, or opportunity.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The result is inefficient search, wrong turns, abandonment, false confidence, and degraded trust. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: The cost of a wrong turn is nontrivial in time, attention, risk, safety, trust, or opportunity. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The cost of a wrong turn is nontrivial in time, attention, risk, safety, trust, or opportunity.", "The result is inefficient search, wrong turns, abandonment, false confidence, and degraded trust."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The cost of a wrong turn is nontrivial in time, attention, risk, safety, trust, or opportunity."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 49, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-049", "ledger_sha256": "a54629090ff96c10a23ba2e672d91d9818616e397e8d28216e65745528896750"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Predictive Precommitment Correction", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:predictive_precommitment_correction", "slug": "predictive_precommitment_correction"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "An actor must commit to an action whose effects will be costly, delayed, dangerous, or slow to correct after execution, while some information about likely consequences is available before commitment but is not yet structurally used to shape the action.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "An actor must commit to an action whose effects will be costly, delayed, dangerous, or slow to correct after execution, while some information about likely consequences is available before commitment but is not yet structurally used to shape the action."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Feedforward can improve timing even when later correction is equally cheap.", "slug": "feedforward"}], "residual_id": "r:predictive_precommitment_correction:b049_a14_c1", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b049_a14_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The cost of after-the-fact correction is materially higher than the cost of pre-correction. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The cost of after-the-fact correction is materially higher than the cost of pre-correction."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Feedforward can improve timing even when later correction is equally cheap.", "slug": "feedforward"}], "normalized_requirement": "After-the-fact correction costs materially more than pre-correction.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "After-the-fact correction costs materially more than pre-correction.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record measures or predicts a disturbance before it affects the controlled output and adjusts action in advance.", "role_mapping": "Previewable consequence -> predicted disturbance effect; action -> control input.", "slug": "feedforward", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b049_a14_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The action has a previewable consequence: trajectory, load, demand, resource need, learner need, control response, user impact, safety margin, or downstream dependency. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The action has a previewable consequence: trajectory, load, demand, resource need, learner need, control response, user impact, safety margin, or downstream dependency."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Feedforward", "one_liner": "A predictive model of an action's consequences is interposed upstream of commitment, so the actor pre-corrects rather than waits for a deviation to feed back.", "page_ref": "prime:feedforward", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Previewable consequence -> predicted disturbance effect; action -> control input.", "slug": "feedforward", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record measures or predicts a disturbance before it affects the controlled output and adjusts action in advance."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The action has a previewable downstream consequence.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record acts before output error appears, addressing delays that make feedback correction late.", "role_mapping": "Late feedback -> output-error delay; pre-correction -> feedforward action.", "slug": "feedforward", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b049_a14_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Feedback will arrive too late, too noisily, or too expensively to be the sole control strategy. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Feedback will arrive too late, too noisily, or too expensively to be the sole control strategy."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Feedforward", "one_liner": "A predictive model of an action's consequences is interposed upstream of commitment, so the actor pre-corrects rather than waits for a deviation to feed back.", "page_ref": "prime:feedforward", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Late feedback -> output-error delay; pre-correction -> feedforward action.", "slug": "feedforward", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record acts before output error appears, addressing delays that make feedback correction late."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Feedback will arrive too late, noisily, or expensively to be the sole control strategy.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Feedforward may compensate a stable known disturbance and need not involve environmental change, overshoot, or oscillation.", "slug": "feedforward"}], "residual_id": "r:predictive_precommitment_correction:b049_a14_c7", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b049_a14_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The system’s environment changes in ways that make purely reactive control lag, overshoot, or oscillate. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The system’s environment changes in ways that make purely reactive control lag, overshoot, or oscillate."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Feedforward may compensate a stable known disturbance and need not involve environmental change, overshoot, or oscillation.", "slug": "feedforward"}], "normalized_requirement": "Environmental change makes purely reactive control lag, overshoot, or oscillate.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Environmental change makes purely reactive control lag, overshoot, or oscillate.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "There is an adjustable action parameter such as timing, amplitude, sequence, routing, dosage, configuration, staffing, or preparation level.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: There is an adjustable action parameter such as timing, amplitude, sequence, routing, dosage, configuration, staffing, or preparation level. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["There is an adjustable action parameter such as timing, amplitude, sequence, routing, dosage, configuration, staffing, or preparation level."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "There is an adjustable action parameter such as timing, amplitude, sequence, routing, dosage, configuration, staffing, or preparation level."}, {"display_text": "A model, simulation, leading signal, historical pattern, or expert forecast can predict the consequence well enough to improve the initial action.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "An actor must commit to an action whose effects will be costly, delayed, dangerous, or slow to correct after execution, while some information about likely consequences is available before commitment but is not yet structurally used to shape the action. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: A model, simulation, leading signal, historical pattern, or expert forecast can predict the consequence well enough to improve the initial action. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A model, simulation, leading signal, historical pattern, or expert forecast can predict the consequence well enough to improve the initial action.", "An actor must commit to an action whose effects will be costly, delayed, dangerous, or slow to correct after execution, while some information about likely consequences is available before commitment but is not yet structurally used to shape the action."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "A model, simulation, leading signal, historical pattern, or expert forecast can predict the consequence well enough to improve the initial action."}, {"display_text": "Commitment is staged, reversible, or gateable long enough to apply the pre-correction.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: Commitment is staged, reversible, or gateable long enough to apply the pre-correction. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Commitment is staged, reversible, or gateable long enough to apply the pre-correction."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Commitment is staged, reversible, or gateable long enough to apply the pre-correction."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 49, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-049", "ledger_sha256": "a54629090ff96c10a23ba2e672d91d9818616e397e8d28216e65745528896750"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Predictive Residual Processing", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:predictive_residual_processing", "slug": "predictive_residual_processing"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system repeatedly transmits, stores, inspects, or reacts to high-volume input whose expected portion is redundant, while scarce bandwidth or attention is consumed and genuinely informative deviations arrive late or are buried. A naive compression or exception rule can save capacity but may hide model drift, rare events, minority signals, or safety-critical context because it lacks a governed prediction-and-correction loop.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system repeatedly transmits, stores, inspects, or reacts to high-volume input whose expected portion is redundant, while scarce bandwidth or attention is consumed and genuinely informative deviations arrive late or are buried. A naive compression or exception rule can save capacity but may hide model drift, rare events, minority signals, or safety-critical context because it lacks a governed prediction-and-correction loop."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires a generative model that predicts incoming signal and transmits primarily residual error.", "role_mapping": "Predictable input -> model prediction; horizon/context -> model scope.", "slug": "predictive_coding", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b049_a15_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Input is strongly predictable over a relevant horizon, context, or hierarchy. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Input is strongly predictable over a relevant horizon, context, or hierarchy."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Predictive Coding", "one_liner": "A system predicts its input and propagates only the prediction error.", "page_ref": "prime:predictive_coding", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Predictable input -> model prediction; horizon/context -> model scope.", "slug": "predictive_coding", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires a generative model that predicts incoming signal and transmits primarily residual error."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Input is strongly predictable over the relevant horizon, context, or hierarchy.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Predictive coding can be used for inference or perception even when bandwidth and energy are abundant.", "slug": "predictive_coding"}], "residual_id": "r:predictive_residual_processing:b049_a15_c2", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b049_a15_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Communication, storage, compute, energy, or human attention is a binding constraint. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Communication, storage, compute, energy, or human attention is a binding constraint."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Predictive coding can be used for inference or perception even when bandwidth and energy are abundant.", "slug": "predictive_coding"}], "normalized_requirement": "Communication, storage, compute, energy, or attention is a binding constraint.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Communication, storage, compute, energy, or attention is a binding constraint.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record defines the signed or structured difference between predicted and observed outcome.", "role_mapping": "Prediction -> expected value; observed input -> outcome; residual -> error.", "slug": "prediction_error", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The exact record computes and propagates prediction residuals at each model level.", "role_mapping": "Measured error -> residual signal; operational meaning -> model-relative discrepancy.", "slug": "predictive_coding", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b049_a15_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Prediction error can be measured in a way that preserves operational meaning. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Prediction error can be measured in a way that preserves operational meaning."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Prediction Error", "one_liner": "The signed discrepancy between a model-generated prediction and its realized observation becomes an operational signal for updating, routing through, or diagnosing the predictor.", "page_ref": "prime:prediction_error", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Prediction -> expected value; observed input -> outcome; residual -> error.", "slug": "prediction_error", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record defines the signed or structured difference between predicted and observed outcome."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Predictive Coding", "one_liner": "A system predicts its input and propagates only the prediction error.", "page_ref": "prime:predictive_coding", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Measured error -> residual signal; operational meaning -> model-relative discrepancy.", "slug": "predictive_coding", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record computes and propagates prediction residuals at each model level."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Prediction error is measurable while preserving operational meaning.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record pairs a top-down generative prediction with bottom-up residuals so expected content is reconstructed from the model.", "role_mapping": "Receiver -> downstream model; expected context -> prediction; transmitted difference -> residual.", "slug": "predictive_coding", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b049_a15_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A receiver or downstream process can reconstruct expected context from a compatible model. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A receiver or downstream process can reconstruct expected context from a compatible model."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Predictive Coding", "one_liner": "A system predicts its input and propagates only the prediction error.", "page_ref": "prime:predictive_coding", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Receiver -> downstream model; expected context -> prediction; transmitted difference -> residual.", "slug": "predictive_coding", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record pairs a top-down generative prediction with bottom-up residuals so expected content is reconstructed from the model."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A receiver can reconstruct expected context from a compatible model.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The system needs continuous learning from deviations rather than one-time compression only.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: The system needs continuous learning from deviations rather than one-time compression only. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The system needs continuous learning from deviations rather than one-time compression only."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The system needs continuous learning from deviations rather than one-time compression only."}, {"display_text": "Full-state audit, resynchronization, and fallback paths can be maintained.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: Full-state audit, resynchronization, and fallback paths can be maintained. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Full-state audit, resynchronization, and fallback paths can be maintained."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Full-state audit, resynchronization, and fallback paths can be maintained."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 49, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-049", "ledger_sha256": "a54629090ff96c10a23ba2e672d91d9818616e397e8d28216e65745528896750"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Preference Conflict Accommodation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:preference_conflict_accommodation", "slug": "preference_conflict_accommodation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Preference conflicts become hard when institutions confuse positions with interests, votes with welfare, behavior with free choice, and agreement with legitimacy. A survey can omit people who cannot attend or safely answer. A majority can impose a small average gain at severe cost to a minority. A veto can protect a right or extract strategic rent. An aggregate can hide bimodality. A negotiation can reflect unequal outside options more than genuine preference intensity. A segmented menu can preserve choice or create a degraded tier for disadvantaged users.\n\nCommon structural failures include:\n\n- **Preference evidence failure:** framing, nonresponse, language, information, access, or proxy selection shapes the recorded preference set.\n- **Constraint blindness:** observed choices are treated as desired choices despite budget, coercion, lack of alternatives, or adaptive expectations.\n- **False commensurability:** rights, dignity, safety, identity, or irreversible harm are converted into ordinary weights or money.\n- **Aggregation loss:** averages and winning rules erase intensity, polarization, tails, local exceptions, and dissent.\n- **Method lock-in:** every conflict is sent to majority vote, weighted scoring, consensus, or negotiation regardless of structure.\n- **Power and standing asymmetry:** organized, wealthy, expert, incumbent, or patient actors gain more voice, veto, or delay power.\n- **False zero-sum framing:** preferences that could coexist by segment, time, role, location, or version are forced into one outcome.\n- **Coercive bargain:** actors accept because outside options, employment, benefits, information, or time are controlled by others.\n- **Impasse exploitation:** whoever can wait longest obtains an informal veto.\n- **Implementation neglect:** residual dissatisfaction, resource gaps, and burden drift undermine the selected arrangement.\n- **Preference lock-in:** a historical compromise persists after actors, evidence, options, or values change.\n\nThese failures explain why no single queue neighbor owns q34. Aggregation supplies one decision operator. Decomposition, revealed-preference analysis, subgroup deliberation, and versioning supply evidence or mechanisms. The parent must choose among them, constrain them, connect them to implementation, and preserve revision.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Actors affected by a shared decision value outcomes differently, rank tradeoffs differently, face different constraints, or attach noncompensable importance to incompatible options. The process either forces a false average, lets the majority erase intense minorities, treats constrained behavior as free preference, fragments into endless deliberation, or allows veto and delay to become power. Even a legitimate decision leaves partial dissatisfaction that can undermine implementation if burdens, reasons, remedy, and revision are absent."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires actors with heterogeneous preference orderings over a shared decision space that cannot all be simultaneously satisfied.", "role_mapping": "Actors -> preference holders; shared choice -> common outcome; conflict -> incompatible rankings.", "slug": "preference_heterogeneity_and_conflict", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b050_a01_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: preference rankings conflict and one shared choice is required. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["preference rankings conflict and one shared choice is required"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Preference Heterogeneity and Conflict", "one_liner": "Incompatible agent preferences create impasses and partial dissatisfaction.", "page_ref": "prime:preference_heterogeneity_and_conflict", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Actors -> preference holders; shared choice -> common outcome; conflict -> incompatible rankings.", "slug": "preference_heterogeneity_and_conflict", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires actors with heterogeneous preference orderings over a shared decision space that cannot all be simultaneously satisfied."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Preference rankings conflict while one shared choice is required.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Preference conflict can concern mild, diffuse tradeoffs with no severe concentrated loser.", "slug": "preference_heterogeneity_and_conflict"}], "residual_id": "r:preference_conflict_accommodation:b050_a01_c2", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b050_a01_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "**Aggregation loss:* averages and winning rules erase intensity, polarization, tails, local exceptions, and dissent. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A winning option creates severe concentrated loss.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["a winning option creates severe concentrated loss", "**Aggregation loss:* averages and winning rules erase intensity, polarization, tails, local exceptions, and dissent."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Preference conflict can concern mild, diffuse tradeoffs with no severe concentrated loser.", "slug": "preference_heterogeneity_and_conflict"}], "normalized_requirement": "A winning option creates severe concentrated loss.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A winning option creates severe concentrated loss.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires a divergence between declared preference and behavior observed under incentives or constraints.", "role_mapping": "Stated preference -> declaration; constrained choice -> revealed behavior.", "slug": "stated_revealed_preference_gap", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b050_a01_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: stated preferences differ from observed constrained choices. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["stated preferences differ from observed constrained choices"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Stated–Revealed Preference Gap", "one_liner": "A reported preference and behavior under a real choice opportunity systematically diverge, so the mismatch must be analyzed as two differently distorted access channels rather than automatically treating either as the agent's true valuation.", "page_ref": "prime:stated_revealed_preference_gap", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Stated preference -> declaration; constrained choice -> revealed behavior.", "slug": "stated_revealed_preference_gap", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires a divergence between declared preference and behavior observed under incentives or constraints."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Stated preferences differ from observed choices made under constraints.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Heterogeneous preferences can aggregate to a stable transitive social order with no agenda cycle.", "slug": "preference_heterogeneity_and_conflict"}], "residual_id": "r:preference_conflict_accommodation:b050_a01_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b050_a01_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: coalitions cycle and agenda order changes the result. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["coalitions cycle and agenda order changes the result"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Heterogeneous preferences can aggregate to a stable transitive social order with no agenda cycle.", "slug": "preference_heterogeneity_and_conflict"}], "normalized_requirement": "Coalitions cycle and agenda order changes the collective result.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Coalitions cycle and agenda order changes the collective result.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires incompatible valued outcomes across actors or segments.", "role_mapping": "Segments -> preference holders; bundle -> shared option.", "slug": "preference_heterogeneity_and_conflict", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b050_a01_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: One bundle cannot satisfy heterogeneous segments. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["one bundle cannot satisfy heterogeneous segments"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Preference Heterogeneity and Conflict", "one_liner": "Incompatible agent preferences create impasses and partial dissatisfaction.", "page_ref": "prime:preference_heterogeneity_and_conflict", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Segments -> preference holders; bundle -> shared option.", "slug": "preference_heterogeneity_and_conflict", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires incompatible valued outcomes across actors or segments."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "One bundle cannot satisfy heterogeneous segments.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Preference conflict need not include veto power, protected rights, or rent extraction.", "slug": "preference_heterogeneity_and_conflict"}], "residual_id": "r:preference_conflict_accommodation:b050_a01_c7", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b050_a01_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: a veto protects either a right or strategic rent and the distinction is unclear. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["a veto protects either a right or strategic rent and the distinction is unclear"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Preference conflict need not include veto power, protected rights, or rent extraction.", "slug": "preference_heterogeneity_and_conflict"}], "normalized_requirement": "A veto may protect a right or extract strategic rent, and the distinction is unclear.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A veto may protect a right or extract strategic rent, and the distinction is unclear.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "issue trades or time sharing could preserve more value.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Actors affected by a shared decision value outcomes differently, rank tradeoffs differently, face different constraints, or attach noncompensable importance to incompatible options. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: issue trades or time sharing could preserve more value. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["issue trades or time sharing could preserve more value", "Actors affected by a shared decision value outcomes differently, rank tradeoffs differently, face different constraints, or attach noncompensable importance to incompatible options."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "issue trades or time sharing could preserve more value"}, {"display_text": "deliberation reaches impasse or produces consensus theater.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use Subgroup Deliberation when premature consensus and groupthink are the main process risk. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: deliberation reaches impasse or produces consensus theater. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["deliberation reaches impasse or produces consensus theater", "Use Subgroup Deliberation when premature consensus and groupthink are the main process risk."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 8, "text": "deliberation reaches impasse or produces consensus theater"}, {"display_text": "implementation resistance reveals unrecorded dissatisfaction.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "**Implementation neglect:* residual dissatisfaction, resource gaps, and burden drift undermine the selected arrangement. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: implementation resistance reveals unrecorded dissatisfaction. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [9], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["implementation resistance reveals unrecorded dissatisfaction", "**Implementation neglect:* residual dissatisfaction, resource gaps, and burden drift undermine the selected arrangement."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 9, "text": "implementation resistance reveals unrecorded dissatisfaction"}, {"display_text": "membership, information, or preferences change after decision.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "**Preference lock-in:* a historical compromise persists after actors, evidence, options, or values change. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: membership, information, or preferences change after decision. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [10], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["membership, information, or preferences change after decision", "**Preference lock-in:* a historical compromise persists after actors, evidence, options, or values change."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 10, "text": "membership, information, or preferences change after decision"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 50, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-050", "ledger_sha256": "c4aff506422df2cdb85ce58aaab41ac9c161457f147aa3c2f3d18ca537774d95"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Preimage Set Characterization", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:preimage_set_characterization", "slug": "preimage_set_characterization"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system observes or specifies an output but does not know, bound, or preserve the set of all inputs that map to it. Users may infer a unique cause, treat examples as exhaustive, act on a lossy projection, or apply a rule without seeing the full membership set that the output condition implies.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system observes or specifies an output but does not know, bound, or preserve the set of all inputs that map to it. Users may infer a unique cause, treat examples as exhaustive, act on a lossy projection, or apply a rule without seeing the full membership set that the output condition implies."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record defines the inverse-direction set of domain elements mapping into a specified codomain subset without requiring an inverse function.", "role_mapping": "Known mapping -> function; inverse direction -> preimage operation.", "slug": "preimage", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b050_a02_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A mapping is known or partially known, but the inverse direction is not directly available. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A mapping is known or partially known, but the inverse direction is not directly available."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Preimage", "one_liner": "The set of all inputs that map to a given output under some mapping.", "page_ref": "prime:preimage", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Known mapping -> function; inverse direction -> preimage operation.", "slug": "preimage", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record defines the inverse-direction set of domain elements mapping into a specified codomain subset without requiring an inverse function."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A mapping is known while the inverse direction is not directly available.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A preimage is a set and can contain multiple distinct domain elements for one output condition without injectivity.", "role_mapping": "Inputs -> domain elements; same output -> codomain value.", "slug": "preimage", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b050_a02_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Multiple distinct inputs can produce the same output, or uniqueness is uncertain. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Multiple distinct inputs can produce the same output, or uniqueness is uncertain."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Preimage", "one_liner": "The set of all inputs that map to a given output under some mapping.", "page_ref": "prime:preimage", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Inputs -> domain elements; same output -> codomain value.", "slug": "preimage", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A preimage is a set and can contain multiple distinct domain elements for one output condition without injectivity."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Multiple inputs can produce the same output or output uniqueness is uncertain.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record characterizes all domain states mapping to a chosen output under a potentially many-to-one function.", "role_mapping": "Richer states -> domain inputs; collapsed category -> output condition.", "slug": "preimage", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b050_a02_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A projection, aggregation, classifier, hash, display, or model collapses richer states into fewer output categories. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A projection, aggregation, classifier, hash, display, or model collapses richer states into fewer output categories."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Preimage", "one_liner": "The set of all inputs that map to a given output under some mapping.", "page_ref": "prime:preimage", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Richer states -> domain inputs; collapsed category -> output condition.", "slug": "preimage", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record characterizes all domain states mapping to a chosen output under a potentially many-to-one function."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A projection, aggregate, classifier, hash, display, or model collapses richer states into fewer outputs.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A preimage can be a known singleton and stakeholders need not make an invalid uniqueness inference.", "slug": "preimage"}], "residual_id": "r:preimage_set_characterization:b050_a02_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b050_a02_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Stakeholders are using one observed output as if it proves one source state. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders are using one observed output as if it proves one source state."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A preimage can be a known singleton and stakeholders need not make an invalid uniqueness inference.", "slug": "preimage"}], "normalized_requirement": "Stakeholders treat one observed output as proof of one unique source state.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Stakeholders treat one observed output as proof of one unique source state.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A preimage can already be completely enumerated and need not arise from example-based search.", "slug": "preimage"}], "residual_id": "r:preimage_set_characterization:b050_a02_c7", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b050_a02_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A search or query returns examples but the decision requires the full satisfying set or a documented partial set. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A search or query returns examples but the decision requires the full satisfying set or a documented partial set."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A preimage can already be completely enumerated and need not arise from example-based search.", "slug": "preimage"}], "normalized_requirement": "A search returns examples while the decision requires the complete satisfying set or documented subset.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A search returns examples while the decision requires the complete satisfying set or documented subset.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "For a fixed mapping and codomain subset, preimage membership is stable and need not involve parameter change.", "slug": "preimage"}], "residual_id": "r:preimage_set_characterization:b050_a02_c8", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b050_a02_c8", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Changing thresholds, codomain categories, or mapping parameters changes which inputs belong to the output condition. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Changing thresholds, codomain categories, or mapping parameters changes which inputs belong to the output condition."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "For a fixed mapping and codomain subset, preimage membership is stable and need not involve parameter change.", "slug": "preimage"}], "normalized_requirement": "Threshold or mapping changes alter membership in the output condition.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Threshold or mapping changes alter membership in the output condition.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [8], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "An output, label, alert, symptom, score, class, status, aggregate, or decision must be traced back to inputs or cases.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system observes or specifies an output but does not know, bound, or preserve the set of all inputs that map to it. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: An output, label, alert, symptom, score, class, status, aggregate, or decision must be traced back to inputs or cases. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["An output, label, alert, symptom, score, class, status, aggregate, or decision must be traced back to inputs or cases.", "A system observes or specifies an output but does not know, bound, or preserve the set of all inputs that map to it."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "An output, label, alert, symptom, score, class, status, aggregate, or decision must be traced back to inputs or cases."}, {"display_text": "Eligibility, compliance, retrieval, diagnosis, classification, or explanation depends on identifying every input satisfying a condition.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: Eligibility, compliance, retrieval, diagnosis, classification, or explanation depends on identifying every input satisfying a condition. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Eligibility, compliance, retrieval, diagnosis, classification, or explanation depends on identifying every input satisfying a condition."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Eligibility, compliance, retrieval, diagnosis, classification, or explanation depends on identifying every input satisfying a condition."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 50, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-050", "ledger_sha256": "c4aff506422df2cdb85ce58aaab41ac9c161457f147aa3c2f3d18ca537774d95"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Premise–Action Decoupling", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:premise_action_decoupling", "slug": "premise_action_decoupling"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A communication channel bundles an overt task with an embedded proposition and relies on grammar, interface design, institutional custom, power, or recordkeeping to treat participation as acceptance. The receiver must either engage and appear to concede the premise or refuse the surface task and absorb avoidable cost. Because the premise is never isolated as a claim, its sponsor avoids the burden of evidence while downstream actors inherit an apparently settled fact, consent, waiver, diagnosis, attribution, jurisdiction, or objective.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A communication channel bundles an overt task with an embedded proposition and relies on grammar, interface design, institutional custom, power, or recordkeeping to treat participation as acceptance. The receiver must either engage and appear to concede the premise or refuse the surface task and absorb avoidable cost. Because the premise is never isolated as a claim, its sponsor avoids the burden of evidence while downstream actors inherit an apparently settled fact, consent, waiver, diagnosis, attribution, jurisdiction, or objective."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record embeds a proposition inside a question or required action so engagement pragmatically accepts more than the surface task.", "role_mapping": "Surface action -> carrier utterance or interface act; extra consequence -> embedded premise uptake.", "slug": "presupposition_smuggling", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b050_a03_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A surface action—answering, clicking, signing, voting, acknowledging, submitting, continuing, or remaining silent—has consequences beyond its ordinary operational meaning. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A surface action—answering, clicking, signing, voting, acknowledging, submitting, continuing, or remaining silent—has consequences beyond its ordinary operational meaning."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Presupposition Smuggling", "one_liner": "A communicative move binds a surface action to an embedded premise so that engaging the surface ratifies the premise without argument.", "page_ref": "prime:presupposition_smuggling", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Surface action -> carrier utterance or interface act; extra consequence -> embedded premise uptake.", "slug": "presupposition_smuggling", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record embeds a proposition inside a question or required action so engagement pragmatically accepts more than the surface task."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A surface action carries consequences beyond its ordinary operational meaning.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires a load-bearing proposition to enter discourse without receiving its own evidential burden.", "role_mapping": "Embedded premise -> smuggled proposition; consequential status -> load-bearing downstream use.", "slug": "presupposition_smuggling", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b050_a03_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: At least one embedded premise is material, contestable, uncertain, value-laden, identity-bearing, or consequential for rights, access, blame, reputation, eligibility, diagnosis, or authority. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["At least one embedded premise is material, contestable, uncertain, value-laden, identity-bearing, or consequential for rights, access, blame, reputation, eligibility, diagnosis, or authority."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Presupposition Smuggling", "one_liner": "A communicative move binds a surface action to an embedded premise so that engaging the surface ratifies the premise without argument.", "page_ref": "prime:presupposition_smuggling", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Embedded premise -> smuggled proposition; consequential status -> load-bearing downstream use.", "slug": "presupposition_smuggling", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires a load-bearing proposition to enter discourse without receiving its own evidential burden."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "At least one embedded premise is material, contestable, uncertain, value-laden, identity-bearing, or consequential.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record relies on answering or participating to accommodate an embedded premise as shared ground.", "role_mapping": "Engagement -> accommodation trigger; assent -> premise uptake.", "slug": "presupposition_smuggling", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b050_a03_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A community, institution, interface, contract, or automated system treats engagement, silence, receipt, or non-objection as premise assent. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A community, institution, interface, contract, or automated system treats engagement, silence, receipt, or non-objection as premise assent."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Presupposition Smuggling", "one_liner": "A communicative move binds a surface action to an embedded premise so that engaging the surface ratifies the premise without argument.", "page_ref": "prime:presupposition_smuggling", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Engagement -> accommodation trigger; assent -> premise uptake.", "slug": "presupposition_smuggling", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record relies on answering or participating to accommodate an embedded premise as shared ground."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "An institution, interface, contract, or system treats engagement, silence, receipt, or non-objection as assent to the premise.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record forces the receiver either to answer within the embedded frame or reject the whole communicative act.", "role_mapping": "Challenge cost -> forced choice; legitimate task -> surface request.", "slug": "presupposition_smuggling", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b050_a03_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The receiver cannot challenge the premise without losing access to the legitimate surface task, incurring retaliation, or appearing evasive. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The receiver cannot challenge the premise without losing access to the legitimate surface task, incurring retaliation, or appearing evasive."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Presupposition Smuggling", "one_liner": "A communicative move binds a surface action to an embedded premise so that engaging the surface ratifies the premise without argument.", "page_ref": "prime:presupposition_smuggling", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Challenge cost -> forced choice; legitimate task -> surface request.", "slug": "presupposition_smuggling", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record forces the receiver either to answer within the embedded frame or reject the whole communicative act."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The receiver cannot challenge the premise without losing the legitimate surface task or incurring avoidable cost.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P089-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve participation and proposition acceptance as separate semantic states.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Participation in an interaction and acceptance of a proposition are distinct states.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the missing distinction or conflation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The selected downstream artifact does not distinguish those states.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a downstream record to conflate participation with acceptance.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The downstream artifact is a record.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a downstream decision to conflate participation with acceptance.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The downstream artifact is a decision.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A downstream record or decision fails to distinguish participation from acceptance of a proposition.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "downstream artifact collapses participation into proposition acceptance", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P089-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A smuggled premise can be challenged immediately and leave no downstream record.", "slug": "presupposition_smuggling"}], "residual_id": "r:premise_action_decoupling:b050_a03_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b050_a03_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Downstream records or decisions do not distinguish participation from proposition acceptance. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Downstream records or decisions do not distinguish participation from proposition acceptance."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Without the qualifier the candidate can occur at another boundary or artifact; once this single context fact is fixed, the mapped spine entails the branch.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Complex Question", "one_liner": "Expose a question that smuggles a contested claim in as its presupposition, so every direct answer silently ratifies the claim and the only sound reply is to refuse the frame.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:complex_question", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O3"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "answer_captured_in_record", "predicate": "The direct answer is captured in a transcript record.", "rationale": "The complete exact DSA plus the single emitted qualifier, if any, necessarily satisfies the selected DNF branch without role, direction, or qualifier laundering."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "complex_question"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "answer_captured_in_record"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "complex_question", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P089-C14-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent reconciliation confirms the exact-record DNF mapping. The candidate supplies every principal role and the relation family; one atomic context qualifier fills the sole remaining branch obligation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Downstream records fail to distinguish participation from proposition acceptance.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Presupposition can be smuggled inadvertently, with no sponsor benefit.", "slug": "presupposition_smuggling"}], "residual_id": "r:premise_action_decoupling:b050_a03_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b050_a03_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The party introducing the premise benefits from shifting the evidential or procedural burden to the receiver. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The party introducing the premise benefits from shifting the evidential or procedural burden to the receiver."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Presupposition can be smuggled inadvertently, with no sponsor benefit.", "slug": "presupposition_smuggling"}], "normalized_requirement": "The premise sponsor benefits by shifting evidential or procedural burden to the receiver.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The premise sponsor benefits by shifting evidential or procedural burden to the receiver.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 50, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-050", "ledger_sha256": "c4aff506422df2cdb85ce58aaab41ac9c161457f147aa3c2f3d18ca537774d95"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Premortem Calibration", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:premortem_calibration", "slug": "premortem_calibration"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 2 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 2}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is success-story dominance. People often evaluate a favored plan by imagining the path where effort, coordination, demand, capacity, technology, politics, and timing cooperate. This creates confidence, but it can also suppress information about failure paths.\n\nThe failure information may be missing for several reasons: optimism bias, sponsor enthusiasm, social pressure, lack of implementation detail, uncertainty avoidance, or fear of seeming negative. As a result, the group underweights plausible breakdowns until the cost of correction is higher.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A plan, forecast, commitment, or launch is evaluated mostly through its success narrative, while plausible failure paths, weak assumptions, and downside preparations remain underexplored."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record prospectively enumerates failure modes, effects, severity, occurrence, and detectability before deployment.", "role_mapping": "Hidden vulnerabilities -> failure modes; costly failure -> severity; before execution -> prospective analysis.", "slug": "failure_mode_and_effects_analysis_fmea", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b050_a04_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Failure would be costly enough that hidden vulnerabilities should be surfaced before execution. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Failure would be costly enough that hidden vulnerabilities should be surfaced before execution."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA)", "one_liner": "Identify failure modes.", "page_ref": "prime:failure_mode_and_effects_analysis_fmea", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Hidden vulnerabilities -> failure modes; costly failure -> severity; before execution -> prospective analysis.", "slug": "failure_mode_and_effects_analysis_fmea", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record prospectively enumerates failure modes, effects, severity, occurrence, and detectability before deployment."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Potential failure is costly enough that hidden vulnerabilities should be surfaced before execution.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P089-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O9"], ["O1", "O2", "O10"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the plan's dependency on the assumption.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A plan depends on an assumption in the selected domain.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve uncertainty rather than treating the assumption as established.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The assumption is uncertain.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires an uncertain demand assumption.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The assumption concerns demand.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires an uncertain behavior assumption.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The assumption concerns behavior.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires an uncertain coordination assumption.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The assumption concerns coordination.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires an uncertain funding assumption.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The assumption concerns funding.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires an uncertain capacity assumption.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The assumption concerns capacity.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires an uncertain timing assumption.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The assumption concerns timing.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires an uncertain regulation assumption.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "The assumption concerns regulation.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires an uncertain external-conditions assumption.", "obligation_id": "O10", "statement": "The assumption concerns external conditions.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A plan depends on uncertain assumptions in one listed domain.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "plan depends on uncertain external or operational assumptions", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P089-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Scenario planning can explore multiple futures even when no single committed plan depends on the listed assumptions.", "slug": "scenario_planning"}], "residual_id": "r:premortem_calibration:b050_a04_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b050_a04_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "People often evaluate a favored plan by imagining the path where effort, coordination, demand, capacity, technology, politics, and timing cooperate. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The plan depends on uncertain assumptions about demand, behavior, coordination, funding, capacity, timing, regulation, or external conditions.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The plan depends on uncertain assumptions about demand, behavior, coordination, funding, capacity, timing, regulation, or external conditions.", "People often evaluate a favored plan by imagining the path where effort, coordination, demand, capacity, technology, politics, and timing cooperate."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A complete instance lacking the tested branch was attempted, but the cited exact structural signature makes all branch obligations necessary.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Scale-Before-Fit", "one_liner": "Diagnose a venture's failure as one of ordering — committing substantial growth investment before demonstrating repeatable, unsubsidised demand — by asking whether the evidence at the moment of commitment justified the cost base it locked in.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:scale_before_fit", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "scale_before_fit"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "scale_before_fit", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P089-C15-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent reconciliation confirms the exact-record DNF mapping. The exact record entails one complete DNF branch without adding a contingent fact or interpretive bridge."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "The top-ranked assumption can concern a nondemand domain; that is precisely the one branch variation supplied by the guard.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Riskiest Assumption Test", "one_liner": "Rank a plan's assumptions by consequence-if-false times uncertainty times upstream-position, then spend the next effort on the cheapest credible test of the top one — the question whose answer would most reduce total wasted work.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:riskiest_assumption_test", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O3"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "riskiest_assumption_concerns_demand", "predicate": "the top-ranked assumption in the candidate's plan inventory concerns demand", "rationale": "The complete exact DSA plus the single emitted qualifier, if any, necessarily satisfies the selected DNF branch without role, direction, or qualifier laundering."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "riskiest_assumption_test"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "the top-ranked assumption in the candidate's plan inventory concerns demand"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "riskiest_assumption_test", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P089-C15-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent reconciliation confirms the exact-record DNF mapping. One branch-selection qualifier completes the demand DNF while leaving the candidate's plan-dependency and uncertainty mechanism unchanged."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A complete instance lacking the tested branch was attempted, but the cited exact structural signature makes all branch obligations necessary.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Plan-Execute Gap", "one_liner": "The pathology in which a coarse-grained planning artefact cannot be enacted because the execution layer faces binding fine-grained constraints the planning model never represented — so the fix is constraint propagation and feedback, never a better forecast.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:plan_execute_gap", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "plan_execute_gap"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "plan_execute_gap", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P089-C15-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent reconciliation confirms the exact-record DNF mapping. The exact record entails one complete DNF branch without adding a contingent fact or interpretive bridge."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A complete instance lacking the tested branch was attempted, but the cited exact structural signature makes all branch obligations necessary.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Make-to-Stock", "one_liner": "Produce finished goods ahead of any order against an aggregate forecast, placing the decoupling point as far downstream as it will go, so customer wait collapses to the order-to-pick interval at the price of holding cost and a binding forecast bet.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:make_to_stock", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "make_to_stock"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "make_to_stock", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P089-C15-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent reconciliation confirms the exact-record DNF mapping. The exact record entails one complete DNF branch without adding a contingent fact or interpretive bridge."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A complete instance lacking the tested branch was attempted, but the cited exact structural signature makes all branch obligations necessary.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Regulatory Surprise", "one_liner": "Name the venture failure in which a plan built on an assumed-stable rule environment is stranded when the rule moves, reframing that environment from a fixed constraint into a slow-moving but observable, monitorable variable.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:regulatory_surprise", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "regulatory_surprise"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "regulatory_surprise", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P089-C15-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent reconciliation confirms the exact-record DNF mapping. The exact record entails one complete DNF branch without adding a contingent fact or interpretive bridge."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The plan depends on uncertain assumptions about demand, behavior, coordination, funding, capacity, timing, regulation, or external conditions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The group is preparing to commit resources, reputation, attention, authority, or irreversible action to a plan.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: The group is preparing to commit resources, reputation, attention, authority, or irreversible action to a plan. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The group is preparing to commit resources, reputation, attention, authority, or irreversible action to a plan."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "The group is preparing to commit resources, reputation, attention, authority, or irreversible action to a plan."}, {"display_text": "Decision makers are excited, time-pressured, status-invested, or socially aligned around success.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Decision makers are excited, time-pressured, status-invested, or socially aligned around success. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Decision makers are excited, time-pressured, status-invested, or socially aligned around success."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "Decision makers are excited, time-pressured, status-invested, or socially aligned around success."}, {"display_text": "People can still revise scope, safeguards, ownership, buffers, monitoring, or go/no-go criteria.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The team should still be able to add safeguards, adjust scope, change sequencing, assign owners, define warning triggers, or change the decision itself. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: People can still revise scope, safeguards, ownership, buffers, monitoring, or go/no-go criteria. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["People can still revise scope, safeguards, ownership, buffers, monitoring, or go/no-go criteria.", "The team should still be able to add safeguards, adjust scope, change sequencing, assign owners, define warning triggers, or change the decision itself."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "People can still revise scope, safeguards, ownership, buffers, monitoring, or go/no-go criteria."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 50, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-050", "ledger_sha256": "c4aff506422df2cdb85ce58aaab41ac9c161457f147aa3c2f3d18ca537774d95"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Present-Bias Countermeasure", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:present_bias_countermeasure", "slug": "present_bias_countermeasure"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a mismatch between when value is experienced and when action is required. Immediate benefits and costs are concrete, emotionally available, and institutionally visible. Future benefits and harms are delayed, probabilistic, cumulative, or inherited by a future self or future group with little power in the current decision.\n\nThis creates a recurring pattern: actors agree that the future matters, but the present choice environment keeps selecting against it. The problem can appear as procrastination, underinvestment, neglected upkeep, depleted reserves, short-term performance chasing, or resource depletion.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "An actor, team, institution, or community repeatedly chooses immediate reward, immediate relief, or present-facing performance over a delayed benefit or delayed harm prevention that it would endorse from a longer time horizon."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record gives present payoffs disproportionate weight relative to delayed benefits or harms.", "role_mapping": "Immediate cost -> present payoff; long-term value -> discounted future payoff.", "slug": "time_preference_discounting_future", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b050_a05_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The long-term option is acknowledged as valuable, but action is delayed because near-term costs are vivid and immediate. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The long-term option is acknowledged as valuable, but action is delayed because near-term costs are vivid and immediate."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Time Preference (Discounting Future)", "one_liner": "Present vs future value.", "page_ref": "prime:time_preference_discounting_future", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Immediate cost -> present payoff; long-term value -> discounted future payoff.", "slug": "time_preference_discounting_future", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record gives present payoffs disproportionate weight relative to delayed benefits or harms."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A long-term option is valued but delayed because immediate costs are more vivid.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Omission bias prefers inaction because of action attribution, not necessarily because inaction favors the present over the future.", "slug": "omission_bias"}], "residual_id": "r:present_bias_countermeasure:b050_a05_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b050_a05_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Inaction defaults to the short-term-biased outcome, such as not saving, not maintaining, not studying, not updating, or not preparing. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Inaction defaults to the short-term-biased outcome, such as not saving, not maintaining, not studying, not updating, or not preparing."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Omission bias prefers inaction because of action attribution, not necessarily because inaction favors the present over the future.", "slug": "omission_bias"}], "normalized_requirement": "Inaction defaults to the short-term-biased outcome.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Inaction defaults to the short-term-biased outcome.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Information value can be immediate and concentrated rather than delayed or inherited.", "slug": "value_of_information"}], "residual_id": "r:present_bias_countermeasure:b050_a05_c3", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b050_a05_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The benefits of action are delayed, dispersed, probabilistic, or inherited by a future self or future group. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The benefits of action are delayed, dispersed, probabilistic, or inherited by a future self or future group."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Information value can be immediate and concentrated rather than delayed or inherited.", "slug": "value_of_information"}], "normalized_requirement": "Benefits are delayed, dispersed, probabilistic, or inherited by a future self or group.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Benefits are delayed, dispersed, probabilistic, or inherited by a future self or group.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Future discounting can occur under calm stable preferences with no metric, urgency, temptation, or emotional crowding.", "slug": "time_preference_discounting_future"}], "residual_id": "r:present_bias_countermeasure:b050_a05_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b050_a05_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Short-term metrics, urgency, temptation, or emotional state crowd out future value. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Short-term metrics, urgency, temptation, or emotional state crowd out future value."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Future discounting can occur under calm stable preferences with no metric, urgency, temptation, or emotional crowding.", "slug": "time_preference_discounting_future"}], "normalized_requirement": "Short-term metrics, urgency, temptation, or emotion crowd out future value.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Short-term metrics, urgency, temptation, or emotion crowd out future value.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record trades near-term speed for deferred structural work whose carrying cost and repair burden accumulate.", "role_mapping": "Deferral -> postponed structural work; future loss -> debt interest and remediation cost.", "slug": "technical_debt", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b050_a05_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Repeated small deferrals accumulate into large future loss, deterioration, debt, depletion, or foreclosed options. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Repeated small deferrals accumulate into large future loss, deterioration, debt, depletion, or foreclosed options."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Technical Debt", "one_liner": "A present expedient choice imposes a future cost that compounds with system growth until it is paid down, with a principal, an interest payment, and a pay-down.", "page_ref": "prime:technical_debt", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Deferral -> postponed structural work; future loss -> debt interest and remediation cost.", "slug": "technical_debt", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record trades near-term speed for deferred structural work whose carrying cost and repair burden accumulate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Repeated deferrals accumulate future debt, deterioration, depletion, loss, or foreclosed options.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 50, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-050", "ledger_sha256": "c4aff506422df2cdb85ce58aaab41ac9c161457f147aa3c2f3d18ca537774d95"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Preventive Maintenance Cadence", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:preventive_maintenance_cadence", "slug": "preventive_maintenance_cadence"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Gradual deterioration is easy to ignore because each small loss looks tolerable. A road cracks a little more, a software dependency ages, a knowledge-base article becomes slightly wrong, a relationship accumulates unspoken friction, or a policy drifts out of fit with reality. None of these events may be dramatic enough to force immediate action.\n\nThe structural failure is that the system waits for breakdown to create urgency. By then, the repair is more expensive, options are narrower, and the damage may already include outage, safety risk, lost trust, institutional decay, or reduced adaptability.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system degrades through use, time, drift, deferred cleanup, environmental exposure, changing context, or repeated small exceptions. Because the decline is gradual, actors postpone upkeep until failure, crisis, unreliability, safety risk, or loss of trust makes repair more expensive and disruptive."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record is sustained preventive work against inevitable degradation acting ahead of failure.", "role_mapping": "Deterioration -> degradation process; inspectable before failure -> preventive horizon.", "slug": "maintenance", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b050_a06_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Deterioration is predictable or inspectable. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["deterioration_is_predictable_or_inspectable"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Maintenance", "one_liner": "Sustained preventive work that keeps a system's intended function intact against inevitable degradation, acting ahead of failure rather than repairing after it.", "page_ref": "prime:maintenance", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Deterioration -> degradation process; inspectable before failure -> preventive horizon.", "slug": "maintenance", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record is sustained preventive work against inevitable degradation acting ahead of failure."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Deterioration is predictable or inspectable before failure.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Maintenance can protect a low-cost function where post-failure repair is cheap.", "slug": "maintenance"}], "residual_id": "r:preventive_maintenance_cadence:b050_a06_c2", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b050_a06_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Repair after failure is costly. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["repair_after_failure_is_costly"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Maintenance can protect a low-cost function where post-failure repair is cheap.", "slug": "maintenance"}], "normalized_requirement": "Repair after failure is materially costly or disruptive.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Repair after failure is materially costly or disruptive.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P090-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve urgent work and preventive upkeep as the competing activities.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A system has urgent operational work and preventive upkeep competing for finite operating capacity.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve urgent-work-to-upkeep-displacement direction, not mere coexistence.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The urgent work displaces or crowds out the preventive upkeep.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail reduced upkeep rather than successful accommodation of both activities.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Preventive upkeep receives less capacity or attention because of that displacement.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Urgent operational work displaces preventive upkeep.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "urgent work crowds preventive upkeep out of operating capacity", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P090-C01-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A maintenance program can have protected capacity and never be crowded out by urgent work.", "slug": "maintenance"}], "residual_id": "r:preventive_maintenance_cadence:b050_a06_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b050_a06_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Urgent work crowds out upkeep. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["urgent_work_crowds_out_upkeep"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A maintenance program can have protected capacity and never be crowded out by urgent work.", "slug": "maintenance"}], "normalized_requirement": "Urgent work crowds out upkeep.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Urgent work crowds out upkeep.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires many individually small losses to accumulate into material degradation before a threshold is noticed.", "role_mapping": "Missed upkeep -> unrepaired small loss; accumulating consequence -> gradual deterioration.", "slug": "gradual_deterioration", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b050_a06_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Missed upkeep has accumulating consequences. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["missed_upkeep_has_accumulating_consequences"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Gradual Deterioration", "one_liner": "The incremental, often invisible decay of a system as sub-threshold stressors accumulate damage until capacity collapses, posing greater risk precisely because the slow progression is easy to overlook.", "page_ref": "prime:gradual_deterioration", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Missed upkeep -> unrepaired small loss; accumulating consequence -> gradual deterioration.", "slug": "gradual_deterioration", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires many individually small losses to accumulate into material degradation before a threshold is noticed."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Missed upkeep has consequences that accumulate through small losses.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Maintenance can be scoped.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source states: Maintenance can be scoped. The normalized feasibility condition is: Maintenance can be scoped. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["maintenance_can_be_scoped"]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "maintenance_can_be_scoped"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 50, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-050", "ledger_sha256": "c4aff506422df2cdb85ce58aaab41ac9c161457f147aa3c2f3d18ca537774d95"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Price Signal Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:price_signal_design", "slug": "price_signal_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is decentralized choice under hidden scarcity. Many actors consume, request, schedule, route, emit, or prioritize locally, but the system-level cost of those choices is not visible at the point of decision. The result can be congestion, shortages, queues, overload, excess emissions, budget leakage, low-priority use of scarce capacity, or repeated escalation to managers and regulators.\n\nThe problem is not merely that something is expensive. It is that the relevant tradeoff is not encoded in the decision environment. If a team can run compute-heavy workflows without seeing the cost, a commuter can drive into a congested road without seeing the delay imposed on others, or a department can demand unlimited shared service support without seeing the opportunity cost, local rationality produces system-level strain.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Many actors make decentralized decisions, but the scarcity, value, cost, congestion, or priority information needed to coordinate those decisions is hidden, delayed, distorted, or communicated only through central instruction. As a result, resources are overused, underused, consumed at the wrong time, misallocated to low-priority uses, or allocated by queues, politics, habit, or unmanaged congestion."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record coordinates decentralized supply and demand by letting actors alter quantity, timing, production, and substitution in response to prices.", "role_mapping": "Local actors -> buyers/sellers; adjustable choice -> demand or supply response; signal -> price.", "slug": "price_mechanism", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b050_a07_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Local actors can adjust consumption, timing, routing, quantity, priority, or substitution when given a meaningful signal. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Local actors can adjust consumption, timing, routing, quantity, priority, or substitution when given a meaningful signal."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Price Mechanism", "one_liner": "Supply-demand pricing.", "page_ref": "prime:price_mechanism", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Local actors -> buyers/sellers; adjustable choice -> demand or supply response; signal -> price.", "slug": "price_mechanism", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record coordinates decentralized supply and demand by letting actors alter quantity, timing, production, and substitution in response to prices."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Local actors can adjust consumption, timing, routing, quantity, priority, or substitution when signaled.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record encodes changing relative scarcity and marginal valuation in an exchange signal.", "role_mapping": "Scarcity/value -> supply-demand conditions; context variation -> price variation.", "slug": "price_mechanism", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b050_a07_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The relevant scarcity or value varies across time, location, quantity, priority, actor, or context. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The relevant scarcity or value varies across time, location, quantity, priority, actor, or context."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Price Mechanism", "one_liner": "Supply-demand pricing.", "page_ref": "prime:price_mechanism", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Scarcity/value -> supply-demand conditions; context variation -> price variation.", "slug": "price_mechanism", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record encodes changing relative scarcity and marginal valuation in an exchange signal."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Relevant scarcity or value varies across time, location, quantity, priority, actor, or context.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record aggregates distributed private supply and demand information through decentralized exchange rather than central case-by-case instruction.", "role_mapping": "Local tradeoff -> private valuation; coordination -> market-clearing signal.", "slug": "price_mechanism", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b050_a07_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when demand can shift across time, quantity, route, intensity, or substitute options; when shared resources are overused because they appear free; or when local teams cannot see the opportunity cost they impose on a larger system. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Central planners cannot observe or optimize every local tradeoff directly.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Central planners cannot observe or optimize every local tradeoff directly.", "It is especially useful when demand can shift across time, quantity, route, intensity, or substitute options; when shared resources are overused because they appear free; or when local teams cannot see the opportunity cost they impose on a larger system."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Price Mechanism", "one_liner": "Supply-demand pricing.", "page_ref": "prime:price_mechanism", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Local tradeoff -> private valuation; coordination -> market-clearing signal.", "slug": "price_mechanism", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record aggregates distributed private supply and demand information through decentralized exchange rather than central case-by-case instruction."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Central planners cannot observe or optimize every local tradeoff directly.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A functioning price mechanism can already reveal relevant marginal scarcity and cost.", "slug": "price_mechanism"}], "residual_id": "r:price_signal_design:b050_a07_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b050_a07_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The current decision environment hides the true cost, scarcity, congestion, or opportunity cost of use. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The current decision environment hides the true cost, scarcity, congestion, or opportunity cost of use."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A functioning price mechanism can already reveal relevant marginal scarcity and cost.", "slug": "price_mechanism"}], "normalized_requirement": "The current decision environment hides true cost, scarcity, congestion, or opportunity cost.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The current decision environment hides true cost, scarcity, congestion, or opportunity cost.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The system can monitor outcomes and adjust the signal when behavior, demand, or capacity changes.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The designer must define what the signal should communicate, who sees it, how they can respond, how the signal changes, and which access or fairness limits cannot be violated. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: The system can monitor outcomes and adjust the signal when behavior, demand, or capacity changes. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The system can monitor outcomes and adjust the signal when behavior, demand, or capacity changes.", "The designer must define what the signal should communicate, who sees it, how they can respond, how the signal changes, and which access or fairness limits cannot be violated."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The system can monitor outcomes and adjust the signal when behavior, demand, or capacity changes."}, {"display_text": "Access, dignity, safety, or legal constraints can be protected separately from the pricing signal.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The designer must define what the signal should communicate, who sees it, how they can respond, how the signal changes, and which access or fairness limits cannot be violated. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: Access, dignity, safety, or legal constraints can be protected separately from the pricing signal. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Access, dignity, safety, or legal constraints can be protected separately from the pricing signal.", "The designer must define what the signal should communicate, who sees it, how they can respond, how the signal changes, and which access or fairness limits cannot be violated."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Access, dignity, safety, or legal constraints can be protected separately from the pricing signal."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 50, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-050", "ledger_sha256": "c4aff506422df2cdb85ce58aaab41ac9c161457f147aa3c2f3d18ca537774d95"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Principal–Agent Alignment", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:principal_agent_alignment", "slug": "principal_agent_alignment"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Delegation creates leverage and vulnerability at the same time. The principal delegates because the agent has capacity, expertise, location, time, authority, or specialized knowledge. That same distance means the principal cannot perfectly observe whether the agent is acting diligently, honestly, prudently, and in line with the principal's goal.\n\nThe structural problem has several common pieces. The principal has an intended outcome or duty. The agent has discretion. The principal cannot fully observe action or quality. The agent has local incentives that may diverge from the principal's goal. Results may be delayed, noisy, or ambiguous. The agent may know more than the principal about what happened and why.\n\nThis can produce shirking, self-dealing, quality degradation, excessive risk taking, concealment of bad news, proxy gaming, or formal compliance that violates the purpose of the delegation.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A principal depends on an agent to act on the principal's behalf, but the agent has private information, hidden action, independent incentives, local priorities, conflicts of interest, or discretion that can move behavior away from the principal's intended goals."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires a principal delegating action that cannot be fully observed or contracted.", "role_mapping": "Principal -> delegator; work -> delegated task; verification gap -> monitoring asymmetry.", "slug": "agency_problem", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b050_a08_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A principal cannot personally perform, observe, or verify all relevant work. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A principal cannot personally perform, observe, or verify all relevant work."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Agency Problem", "one_liner": "Misaligned incentives.", "page_ref": "prime:agency_problem", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Principal -> delegator; work -> delegated task; verification gap -> monitoring asymmetry.", "slug": "agency_problem", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires a principal delegating action that cannot be fully observed or contracted."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A principal cannot personally perform, observe, or verify all delegated work.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires delegated discretion or hidden action by the agent.", "role_mapping": "Agent discretion -> action choice; delegated task -> principal mandate.", "slug": "agency_problem", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b050_a08_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The agent has discretion over effort, timing, quality, risk, representation, resource use, or tradeoffs. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The agent has discretion over effort, timing, quality, risk, representation, resource use, or tradeoffs."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Agency Problem", "one_liner": "Misaligned incentives.", "page_ref": "prime:agency_problem", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Agent discretion -> action choice; delegated task -> principal mandate.", "slug": "agency_problem", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires delegated discretion or hidden action by the agent."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The agent has discretion over effort, timing, quality, risk, representation, resources, or tradeoffs.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires divergent objectives between principal and agent under information asymmetry.", "role_mapping": "Private incentives -> agent utility; desired outcome -> principal objective.", "slug": "agency_problem", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b050_a08_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The agent has local incentives that may diverge from the principal's goal. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The agent's private incentives differ from the principal's desired outcome.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The agent's private incentives differ from the principal's desired outcome.", "The agent has local incentives that may diverge from the principal's goal."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Agency Problem", "one_liner": "Misaligned incentives.", "page_ref": "prime:agency_problem", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Private incentives -> agent utility; desired outcome -> principal objective.", "slug": "agency_problem", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires divergent objectives between principal and agent under information asymmetry."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The agent's private incentives differ from the principal's desired outcome.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires hidden action or information that prevents the principal from separating effort from outcome noise.", "role_mapping": "Bad luck versus effort -> outcome attribution under hidden action.", "slug": "agency_problem", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The exact record requires an actor insulated from downside and able to take hidden risk or reduce effort after protection.", "role_mapping": "Agent -> protected actor; hidden effort/risk -> moral-hazard action; principal -> downside bearer.", "slug": "moral_hazard", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b050_a08_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The principal cannot fully observe action or quality. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The principal cannot fully observe action quality or distinguish bad luck from bad effort.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The principal cannot fully observe action quality or distinguish bad luck from bad effort.", "The principal cannot fully observe action or quality."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Agency Problem", "one_liner": "Misaligned incentives.", "page_ref": "prime:agency_problem", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Bad luck versus effort -> outcome attribution under hidden action.", "slug": "agency_problem", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires hidden action or information that prevents the principal from separating effort from outcome noise."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Moral Hazard", "one_liner": "Risk-taking under protection.", "page_ref": "prime:moral_hazard", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Agent -> protected actor; hidden effort/risk -> moral-hazard action; principal -> downside bearer.", "slug": "moral_hazard", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires an actor insulated from downside and able to take hidden risk or reduce effort after protection."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The principal cannot fully observe action quality or distinguish bad luck from bad effort.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The delegation relationship is important enough to justify governance costs.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use it when there is a delegation relationship: someone acts for someone else, and the gap between intent and action can create loss, harm, drift, or betrayal. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: The delegation relationship is important enough to justify governance costs. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The delegation relationship is important enough to justify governance costs.", "Use it when there is a delegation relationship: someone acts for someone else, and the gap between intent and action can create loss, harm, drift, or betrayal."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The delegation relationship is important enough to justify governance costs."}, {"display_text": "There is a meaningful target outcome, duty, mission, or interest that the agent's behavior should track.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The principal has an intended outcome or duty. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: There is a meaningful target outcome, duty, mission, or interest that the agent's behavior should track. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["There is a meaningful target outcome, duty, mission, or interest that the agent's behavior should track.", "The principal has an intended outcome or duty."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "There is a meaningful target outcome, duty, mission, or interest that the agent's behavior should track."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 50, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-050", "ledger_sha256": "c4aff506422df2cdb85ce58aaab41ac9c161457f147aa3c2f3d18ca537774d95"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Principal-Bound Authority Mediation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:principal_bound_authority_mediation", "slug": "principal_bound_authority_mediation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A privileged intermediary receives a request influenced by an actor that lacks the necessary authority. Because the intermediary checks only its own permissions, ambient credentials, or local validity rules, it performs an action the originator could not legitimately perform. Authority crosses the boundary through the deputy without an explicit record of whose intent, scope, and authorization justified the action.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A privileged intermediary receives a request influenced by an actor that lacks the necessary authority. Because the intermediary checks only its own permissions, ambient credentials, or local validity rules, it performs an action the originator could not legitimately perform. Authority crosses the boundary through the deputy without an explicit record of whose intent, scope, and authorization justified the action."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires a deputy with authority unavailable to an initiating requester.", "role_mapping": "Intermediary -> deputy; originator -> requester; more authority -> privileged capability.", "slug": "confused_deputy", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b050_a09_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: An intermediary, proxy, service, role, official, agent, workflow, or automated process has more authority than at least some request originators. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["An intermediary, proxy, service, role, official, agent, workflow, or automated process has more authority than at least some request originators."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Confused Deputy", "one_liner": "A privileged intermediary acts on its own authority while the intent originated with an outsider who lacks it, so authority is borrowed without intent being tracked.", "page_ref": "prime:confused_deputy", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Intermediary -> deputy; originator -> requester; more authority -> privileged capability.", "slug": "confused_deputy", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires a deputy with authority unavailable to an initiating requester."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "An intermediary has more authority than at least some request originators.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires an unprivileged requester to induce the privileged deputy to exercise its authority.", "role_mapping": "Request actor -> unprivileged requester; forwarded action -> induced deputy operation.", "slug": "confused_deputy", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b050_a09_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Requests can be initiated, shaped, replayed, forwarded, embedded, or disguised by actors who do not themselves possess the deputy’s authority. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Requests can be initiated, shaped, replayed, forwarded, embedded, or disguised by actors who do not themselves possess the deputy’s authority."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Confused Deputy", "one_liner": "A privileged intermediary acts on its own authority while the intent originated with an outsider who lacks it, so authority is borrowed without intent being tracked.", "page_ref": "prime:confused_deputy", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Request actor -> unprivileged requester; forwarded action -> induced deputy operation.", "slug": "confused_deputy", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires an unprivileged requester to induce the privileged deputy to exercise its authority."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Actors lacking deputy authority can initiate, shape, replay, forward, embed, or disguise requests.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The defining failure is using the deputy's own ambient authority without binding the requester's identity, intent, and scope.", "role_mapping": "Ambient credential -> deputy authority; missing request authorization -> confused authority check.", "slug": "confused_deputy", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b050_a09_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The deputy can confuse ambient credentials, channel access, session presence, or internal service trust with request-specific authorization. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The deputy can confuse ambient credentials, channel access, session presence, or internal service trust with request-specific authorization."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Confused Deputy", "one_liner": "A privileged intermediary acts on its own authority while the intent originated with an outsider who lacks it, so authority is borrowed without intent being tracked.", "page_ref": "prime:confused_deputy", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Ambient credential -> deputy authority; missing request authorization -> confused authority check.", "slug": "confused_deputy", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The defining failure is using the deputy's own ambient authority without binding the requester's identity, intent, and scope."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The deputy can confuse ambient credentials or channel trust with request-specific authorization.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires a request path that fails to bind requester identity and intended purpose to privileged execution.", "role_mapping": "Stripped context -> missing principal binding; request path -> deputy interface.", "slug": "confused_deputy", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b050_a09_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A cross-boundary request path strips, blurs, or fails to carry originator identity, tenant context, consent, authority scope, or user intent. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A cross-boundary request path strips, blurs, or fails to carry originator identity, tenant context, consent, authority scope, or user intent."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Confused Deputy", "one_liner": "A privileged intermediary acts on its own authority while the intent originated with an outsider who lacks it, so authority is borrowed without intent being tracked.", "page_ref": "prime:confused_deputy", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Stripped context -> missing principal binding; request path -> deputy interface.", "slug": "confused_deputy", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires a request path that fails to bind requester identity and intended purpose to privileged execution."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A cross-boundary request path loses originator identity, tenant context, consent, authority scope, or intent.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The action is sensitive enough that authorization must depend on the originator and purpose, not merely on the deputy’s ability to perform it.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Because the intermediary checks only its own permissions, ambient credentials, or local validity rules, it performs an action the originator could not legitimately perform. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: The action is sensitive enough that authorization must depend on the originator and purpose, not merely on the deputy’s ability to perform it. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The action is sensitive enough that authorization must depend on the originator and purpose, not merely on the deputy’s ability to perform it.", "Because the intermediary checks only its own permissions, ambient credentials, or local validity rules, it performs an action the originator could not legitimately perform."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The action is sensitive enough that authorization must depend on the originator and purpose, not merely on the deputy’s ability to perform it."}, {"display_text": "Audit or accountability would otherwise record only the deputy’s execution, not the principal who caused or benefited from it.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Authority crosses the boundary through the deputy without an explicit record of whose intent, scope, and authorization justified the action. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Audit or accountability would otherwise record only the deputy’s execution, not the principal who caused or benefited from it. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Audit or accountability would otherwise record only the deputy’s execution, not the principal who caused or benefited from it.", "Authority crosses the boundary through the deputy without an explicit record of whose intent, scope, and authorization justified the action."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Audit or accountability would otherwise record only the deputy’s execution, not the principal who caused or benefited from it."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 50, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-050", "ledger_sha256": "c4aff506422df2cdb85ce58aaab41ac9c161457f147aa3c2f3d18ca537774d95"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Priority-Based Admission", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:priority_based_admission", "slug": "priority_based_admission"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 2 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 2}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Candidate demand exceeds admission capacity and candidates differ in urgency, value, risk, time sensitivity, or ethical entitlement.", "explanation_source": {"field": "diagnostic_head", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Candidate demand exceeds admission capacity and candidates differ in urgency, value, risk, time sensitivity, or ethical entitlement."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "This branch preserves the complete remedy-free diagnostic route; goals, feasibility clauses, gates, deployment constraints, and supporting context remain outside the DNF."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "EXT001-C073", "dnf": [["EXT001-U073-O1"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"obligation_id": "EXT001-U073-O1", "predicate": "More candidate load or demand seeks entry than the system can safely or effectively admit at once."}], "predicate": "More candidate load or demand seeks entry than the system can safely or effectively admit at once.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "More candidate load or demand seeks entry than the system can safely or effectively admit at once.", "unit_id": "EXT001-U073"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"catalog_exhaustion": "CONDITION_LEVEL", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: More candidate load or demand seeks entry than the system can safely or effectively admit at once.", "slug": "rent_seeking"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: More candidate load or demand seeks entry than the system can safely or effectively admit at once.", "slug": "mediator_availability_constraint"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: More candidate load or demand seeks entry than the system can safely or effectively admit at once.", "slug": "capacity_recovery_interval"}], "residual_id": "EXT001:priority_based_admission:C01", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding."}}, "condition_id": "ext001_priority_based_admission_a01", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored essence_one_line, compression_statement, components fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: More candidate load or demand seeks entry than the system can safely or effectively admit at once.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["More candidate load or demand seeks entry than the system can safely or effectively admit at once."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "EXTENSION_COUNTEREXAMPLE_AUDIT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A large but absorbable helper influx is excluded by the DSA's threshold sign-flip, so every complete instance exceeds effective admission capacity.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Volunteer-Management Overload", "one_liner": "The crisis failure mode in which would-be helpers arrive faster than a response system's finite credential-brief-assign-supervise intake channel can absorb them, so beyond a threshold each marginal arrival consumes net capacity rather than adding it.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:volunteer_management_overload", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "volunteer_management_overload"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "volunteer_management_overload", "source_unit_id": "EXT001-U073", "why_it_fits": "Volunteer-management overload necessarily has more candidate arrivals than a finite credential-brief-assign-supervise channel can admit effectively at once."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "More candidate load or demand seeks entry than the system can safely or effectively admit at once.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "EXT001-C074", "dnf": [["EXT001-U074-O1"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"obligation_id": "EXT001-U074-O1", "predicate": "Candidates differ in priority-relevant urgency, value, risk, time sensitivity, or ethical entitlement."}], "predicate": "Candidates differ in priority-relevant urgency, value, risk, time sensitivity, or ethical entitlement.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Candidates differ in priority-relevant urgency, value, risk, time sensitivity, or ethical entitlement.", "unit_id": "EXT001-U074"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"catalog_exhaustion": "CONDITION_LEVEL", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Candidates differ in priority-relevant urgency, value, risk, time sensitivity, or ethical entitlement.", "slug": "prioritization"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Candidates differ in priority-relevant urgency, value, risk, time sensitivity, or ethical entitlement.", "slug": "preference_falsification"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Candidates differ in priority-relevant urgency, value, risk, time sensitivity, or ethical entitlement.", "slug": "inverted_pyramid"}], "residual_id": "EXT001:priority_based_admission:C02", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding."}}, "condition_id": "ext001_priority_based_admission_a02", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored essence_one_line, compression_statement, components fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: Candidates differ in priority-relevant urgency, value, risk, time sensitivity, or ethical entitlement.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Candidates differ in priority-relevant urgency, value, risk, time sensitivity, or ethical entitlement."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Candidates differ in priority-relevant urgency, value, risk, time sensitivity, or ethical entitlement.", "slug": "prioritization"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Candidates differ in priority-relevant urgency, value, risk, time sensitivity, or ethical entitlement.", "slug": "preference_falsification"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Candidates differ in priority-relevant urgency, value, risk, time sensitivity, or ethical entitlement.", "slug": "inverted_pyramid"}], "normalized_requirement": "Candidates differ in priority-relevant urgency, value, risk, time sensitivity, or ethical entitlement.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Candidates differ in priority-relevant urgency, value, risk, time sensitivity, or ethical entitlement.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Admission can be delayed, denied, or sequenced at the boundary.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored essence_one_line, compression_statement, components fields; the source file was not modified. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: Admission can be delayed, denied, or sequenced at the boundary. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Admission can be delayed, denied, or sequenced at the boundary.", "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored essence_one_line, compression_statement, components fields; the source file was not modified."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Admission can be delayed, denied, or sequenced at the boundary."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"candidate_ledger_sha256": "96f72d2139077fd57bf795048ebef33b3fd574b20963170080ec916b5b3b92fe", "extension_id": "new-archetypes-extension-001", "ledger_id": "prime-production-v1.2-extension-001", "ledger_sha256": "9644520614744632d1d36da44b1acd77ce432852c6083eb871203521c166efce"}, "base_projection_sha256": "841e0c7f3cb8e8054475ad29a8a14745a416b4fc115559a44878b94292e673ec", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "ca09ed9fe1598ce7072755b530de5553f5ee0a7cd64ae82d9e4a4e2149a37788", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Private Information Asymmetry Governance", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:private_information_asymmetry_governance", "slug": "private_information_asymmetry_governance"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A transaction, delegation, allocation, safety decision, or cooperative interaction depends on facts that are privately known by one party and not available to another party who must rely on the decision. If the gap is ignored, the system may invite adverse selection, moral hazard, strategic misrepresentation, principal-agent drift, biased allocation, or unearned trust. If the gap is overcorrected, the system may violate privacy, exclude legitimate participants, create costly bureaucracy, or teach participants to game the revelation mechanism.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A transaction, delegation, allocation, safety decision, or cooperative interaction depends on facts that are privately known by one party and not available to another party who must rely on the decision. If the gap is ignored, the system may invite adverse selection, moral hazard, strategic misrepresentation, principal-agent drift, biased allocation, or unearned trust. If the gap is overcorrected, the system may violate privacy, exclude legitimate participants, create costly bureaucracy, or teach participants to game the revelation mechanism."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires unequal possession of transaction-relevant information between parties.", "role_mapping": "Informed party -> private-information holder; relying party -> less-informed actor; fact -> quality/risk/type.", "slug": "information_asymmetry", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b050_a10_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The fact changes pricing, allocation, trust, safety, or accountability. In this condition set, the requirement is: One party knows a material fact another relying party cannot directly observe.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["One party knows a materially relevant fact about quality, risk, cost, intent, capacity, identity, need, or future action that another party cannot directly observe."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Information Asymmetry", "one_liner": "Parties to an interaction hold unequal private knowledge.", "page_ref": "prime:information_asymmetry", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Informed party -> private-information holder; relying party -> less-informed actor; fact -> quality/risk/type.", "slug": "information_asymmetry", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires unequal possession of transaction-relevant information between parties."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "One party knows a material fact another relying party cannot directly observe.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Information can be asymmetric when the informed party is indifferent or eager to disclose truthfully.", "slug": "information_asymmetry"}], "residual_id": "r:private_information_asymmetry_governance:b050_a10_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b050_a10_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Strategic behavior is plausible even if not yet observed. In this condition set, the requirement is: The informed party has incentives to hide, exaggerate, selectively reveal, or delay the fact.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The party with private information has incentives to hide, exaggerate, selectively reveal, or delay the fact."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Information can be asymmetric when the informed party is indifferent or eager to disclose truthfully.", "slug": "information_asymmetry"}], "normalized_requirement": "The informed party has incentives to hide, exaggerate, selectively reveal, or delay the fact.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The informed party has incentives to hide, exaggerate, selectively reveal, or delay the fact.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires hidden type information to change participation so worse risks disproportionately enter or remain.", "role_mapping": "High-risk entrant -> hidden type; pool/market -> selection mechanism.", "slug": "adverse_selection", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b050_a10_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is the adverse-selection route through the parent pattern. In this condition set, the requirement is: A pool, market, queue, contract, delegation, or platform attracts hidden high-risk or low-quality participants.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A pool, market, queue, contract, delegation, or platform starts attracting hidden high-risk or low-quality participants."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Adverse Selection", "one_liner": "Hidden pre-contractual types make participation under uniform terms systematically more attractive to the types worst for the uninformed side, degrading or unraveling the pool.", "page_ref": "prime:adverse_selection", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "High-risk entrant -> hidden type; pool/market -> selection mechanism.", "slug": "adverse_selection", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires hidden type information to change participation so worse risks disproportionately enter or remain."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A pool, market, queue, contract, delegation, or platform attracts hidden high-risk or low-quality participants.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Information asymmetry can concern fixed product quality before exchange, with no protected actor or post-contract action.", "slug": "information_asymmetry"}], "residual_id": "r:private_information_asymmetry_governance:b050_a10_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b050_a10_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is the moral-hazard / agency route through the parent pattern. In this condition set, the requirement is: A protected or delegated actor can take hidden action after receiving protection, authority, or access.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A protected or delegated actor can take hidden actions after receiving protection, authority, or access."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Information asymmetry can concern fixed product quality before exchange, with no protected actor or post-contract action.", "slug": "information_asymmetry"}], "normalized_requirement": "A protected or delegated actor can take hidden action after receiving protection, authority, or access.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A protected or delegated actor can take hidden action after receiving protection, authority, or access.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record includes a less-informed party unable to observe the informed party's quality or type before deciding.", "role_mapping": "Receiver -> uninformed party; quality -> private type.", "slug": "information_asymmetry", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b050_a10_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Screening and signaling become candidate mechanisms. In this condition set, the requirement is: Receivers cannot distinguish high- from low-quality claims, credentials, products, or commitments.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Receivers cannot distinguish high-quality from low-quality claims, credentials, products, or commitments."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Information Asymmetry", "one_liner": "Parties to an interaction hold unequal private knowledge.", "page_ref": "prime:information_asymmetry", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Receiver -> uninformed party; quality -> private type.", "slug": "information_asymmetry", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record includes a less-informed party unable to observe the informed party's quality or type before deciding."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Receivers cannot distinguish high- from low-quality claims, credentials, products, or commitments.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Disclosure would be useful but creates privacy, security, legitimacy, or fairness concerns.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Verification, attestation, escrow, selective disclosure, or privacy-preserving proof may be better than full revelation. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: Disclosure would be useful but creates privacy, security, legitimacy, or fairness concerns. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Disclosure would be useful but creates privacy, security, legitimacy, or fairness concerns.", "Verification, attestation, escrow, selective disclosure, or privacy-preserving proof may be better than full revelation."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Disclosure would be useful but creates privacy, security, legitimacy, or fairness concerns."}, {"display_text": "Existing remedies address only a subcase and no one owns the cross-case information map.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The parent governance layer is missing. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Existing remedies address only a subcase and no one owns the cross-case information map. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Existing remedies address only a subcase and no one owns the cross-case information map.", "The parent governance layer is missing."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "Existing remedies address only a subcase and no one owns the cross-case information map."}, {"display_text": "Participants disagree about whether the problem is ignorance, deception, market failure, conflict of interest, or legitimate confidentiality.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Classification is needed before remedy selection. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Participants disagree about whether the problem is ignorance, deception, market failure, conflict of interest, or legitimate confidentiality. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Participants disagree about whether the problem is ignorance, deception, market failure, conflict of interest, or legitimate confidentiality.", "Classification is needed before remedy selection."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 8, "text": "Participants disagree about whether the problem is ignorance, deception, market failure, conflict of interest, or legitimate confidentiality."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 50, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-050", "ledger_sha256": "c4aff506422df2cdb85ce58aaab41ac9c161457f147aa3c2f3d18ca537774d95"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Probabilistic Risk Weighting", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:probabilistic_risk_weighting", "slug": "probabilistic_risk_weighting"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 4 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a mismatch between possible outcomes and action priority. People often reason from salience: the most emotionally vivid or recently discussed scenario feels most important. Other times, they make the opposite error and dismiss low-probability severe harms because “it probably will not happen.”\n\nThe missing structure is a joint representation of likelihood and consequence. Without it, probability, impact, evidence quality, and response thresholds remain implicit. That makes decisions hard to audit and easy to distort.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A decision faces multiple possible outcomes, but actors overreact to vivid possibilities, ignore likelihood, or fail to combine likelihood with impact."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A risk analysis can concern one isolated outcome with no competition for attention.", "slug": "risk"}], "residual_id": "r:probabilistic_risk_weighting:b050_a11_c1", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b050_a11_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The structural problem is a mismatch between possible outcomes and action priority. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Multiple possible outcomes compete for attention or resources.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Multiple possible outcomes compete for attention or resources.", "The structural problem is a mismatch between possible outcomes and action priority."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A risk analysis can concern one isolated outcome with no competition for attention.", "slug": "risk"}], "normalized_requirement": "Multiple possible outcomes compete for attention or resources.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Multiple possible outcomes compete for attention or resources.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A well-formed risk record can explicitly combine probability and consequence.", "slug": "risk"}], "residual_id": "r:probabilistic_risk_weighting:b050_a11_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b050_a11_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Likelihood and consequence are discussed separately or implicitly. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Likelihood and consequence are discussed separately or implicitly."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A well-formed risk record can explicitly combine probability and consequence.", "slug": "risk"}], "normalized_requirement": "Likelihood and consequence are discussed separately or left implicit.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Likelihood and consequence are discussed separately or left implicit.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Risk exists even with abundant response capacity.", "slug": "risk"}], "residual_id": "r:probabilistic_risk_weighting:b050_a11_c3", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b050_a11_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Risk response capacity is limited. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Risk response capacity is limited."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Risk exists even with abundant response capacity.", "slug": "risk"}], "normalized_requirement": "Risk-response capacity is limited.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Risk-response capacity is limited.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record revises a prior probability into a posterior conditional on new evidence.", "role_mapping": "New evidence -> likelihood observation; probability estimate -> prior/posterior.", "slug": "bayesian_updating", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b050_a11_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: New evidence may change the probability or consequence estimate. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["New evidence may change the probability or consequence estimate."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Bayesian Updating", "one_liner": "Update beliefs with evidence.", "page_ref": "prime:bayesian_updating", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "New evidence -> likelihood observation; probability estimate -> prior/posterior.", "slug": "bayesian_updating", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record revises a prior probability into a posterior conditional on new evidence."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "New evidence may revise the probability estimate.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 50, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-050", "ledger_sha256": "c4aff506422df2cdb85ce58aaab41ac9c161457f147aa3c2f3d18ca537774d95"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Problem-Distribution Fit Selection", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:problem_distribution_fit_selection", "slug": "problem_distribution_fit_selection"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system must choose among search, optimization, inference, or learning procedures while the candidate methods are being compared as if one could dominate across all possible problem instances. Without an explicit problem distribution and bias-fit test, the chosen method may win benchmark theater, overfit to a narrow suite, fail out of distribution, or become a dogma that suppresses better domain-matched alternatives.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system must choose among search, optimization, inference, or learning procedures while the candidate methods are being compared as if one could dominate across all possible problem instances. Without an explicit problem distribution and bias-fit test, the chosen method may win benchmark theater, overfit to a narrow suite, fail out of distribution, or become a dogma that suppresses better domain-matched alternatives."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The theorem can be stated while a team explicitly supplies a restricted distribution and makes no universal-best claim.", "slug": "no_free_lunch_theorem"}], "residual_id": "r:problem_distribution_fit_selection:b050_a12_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b050_a12_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A team asks which algorithm, model, heuristic, solver, policy, or decision procedure is best without specifying the operating problem class. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A team asks which algorithm, model, heuristic, solver, policy, or decision procedure is best without specifying the operating problem class."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The theorem can be stated while a team explicitly supplies a restricted distribution and makes no universal-best claim.", "slug": "no_free_lunch_theorem"}], "normalized_requirement": "A team asks for the best procedure without specifying the operating problem class.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A team asks for the best procedure without specifying the operating problem class.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires success in a preparation environment followed by systematic underperformance in a different deployment environment.", "role_mapping": "Benchmark/domain -> preparation distribution; broader environment -> serving distribution.", "slug": "training_serving_skew", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b050_a12_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A method has strong performance in one benchmark, domain, or data regime and is being generalized to a broader environment. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A method has strong performance in one benchmark, domain, or data regime and is being generalized to a broader environment."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Training Serving Skew", "one_liner": "A system prepared in one environment silently underperforms in a systematically different one.", "page_ref": "prime:training_serving_skew", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Benchmark/domain -> preparation distribution; broader environment -> serving distribution.", "slug": "training_serving_skew", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires success in a preparation environment followed by systematic underperformance in a different deployment environment."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Strong performance in one benchmark or regime is generalized to a broader environment.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires that any algorithm's advantage on one class is offset elsewhere, so performance depends on distribution-matched bias.", "role_mapping": "Methods -> algorithms; assumptions -> inductive biases; problem distribution -> task class.", "slug": "no_free_lunch_theorem", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b050_a12_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Different methods embody different assumptions about smoothness, sparsity, stationarity, independence, convexity, adversarial behavior, noise, or cost structure. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Different methods embody different assumptions about smoothness, sparsity, stationarity, independence, convexity, adversarial behavior, noise, or cost structure."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "No Free Lunch Theorem", "one_liner": "Averaged over all problem instances, no search, optimization, or learning procedure outperforms any other; a method's value is the match between its inductive bias and the problems it faces.", "page_ref": "prime:no_free_lunch_theorem", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Methods -> algorithms; assumptions -> inductive biases; problem distribution -> task class.", "slug": "no_free_lunch_theorem", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires that any algorithm's advantage on one class is offset elsewhere, so performance depends on distribution-matched bias."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Methods embody different assumptions or inductive biases about the problem distribution.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The theorem averages over all possible objective functions and does not require a particular narrower real distribution or benchmark risk.", "slug": "no_free_lunch_theorem"}], "residual_id": "r:problem_distribution_fit_selection:b050_a12_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b050_a12_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The true distribution of cases is narrower than all possible cases but broad enough that naive benchmark selection is risky. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The true distribution of cases is narrower than all possible cases but broad enough that naive benchmark selection is risky."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The theorem averages over all possible objective functions and does not require a particular narrower real distribution or benchmark risk.", "slug": "no_free_lunch_theorem"}], "normalized_requirement": "The true case distribution is narrower than all possible cases but broad enough that naive benchmark choice is risky.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The true case distribution is narrower than all possible cases but broad enough that naive benchmark choice is risky.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Training-serving skew can exist from the outset without a temporal environmental shift.", "slug": "training_serving_skew"}], "residual_id": "r:problem_distribution_fit_selection:b050_a12_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b050_a12_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The environment may shift, creating a gap between historical fit evidence and future performance. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The environment may shift, creating a gap between historical fit evidence and future performance."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Training-serving skew can exist from the outset without a temporal environmental shift.", "slug": "training_serving_skew"}], "normalized_requirement": "Environmental shift creates a gap between historical fit evidence and future performance.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Environmental shift creates a gap between historical fit evidence and future performance.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "High-stakes deployment requires knowing where a method is not expected to work.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: High-stakes deployment requires knowing where a method is not expected to work. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["High-stakes deployment requires knowing where a method is not expected to work."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "High-stakes deployment requires knowing where a method is not expected to work."}, {"display_text": "A domain uses slogans such as best model, best optimizer, best practice, or universal solution without stating the reference class.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: A domain uses slogans such as best model, best optimizer, best practice, or universal solution without stating the reference class. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A domain uses slogans such as best model, best optimizer, best practice, or universal solution without stating the reference class."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "A domain uses slogans such as best model, best optimizer, best practice, or universal solution without stating the reference class."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 50, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-050", "ledger_sha256": "c4aff506422df2cdb85ce58aaab41ac9c161457f147aa3c2f3d18ca537774d95"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Problem Space Mapping", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:problem_space_mapping", "slug": "problem_space_mapping"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 5 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is invisible possibility structure. Actors may have facts, opinions, constraints, and proposed solutions, but they do not yet have a shared map of the space in which those elements relate.\n\nSeveral things can be unclear at once: the current state, the target state, what counts as a valid move, which constraints are fixed, which constraints are assumptions, what paths lead to dead ends, and which regions of the space have never been inspected. Without that structure, exploration becomes reactive. The group tends to revisit familiar options, debate preferred answers, or treat the first visible path as the whole problem.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Actors cannot reason clearly because the possible states, moves, constraints, goals, dependencies, and unexplored regions of the problem are implicit, scattered, contested, or poorly organized. The problem may look like a single question, a list of options, or a conflict of opinions, when it is actually a space of possible positions and transitions that must be made visible before intelligent exploration can occur."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Problem framing can already be completed before solution debate begins.", "slug": "problem_framing"}], "residual_id": "r:problem_space_mapping:b050_a13_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b050_a13_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The team is debating solutions before agreeing on the shape of the problem. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The team is debating solutions before agreeing on the shape of the problem."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Problem framing can already be completed before solution debate begins.", "slug": "problem_framing"}], "normalized_requirement": "The team debates solutions before agreeing on the problem's shape.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The team debates solutions before agreeing on the problem's shape.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A problem representation can explicitly encode every dependency and consequence.", "slug": "problem_representation"}], "residual_id": "r:problem_space_mapping:b050_a13_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b050_a13_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Options are listed but not related to prerequisites, consequences, or downstream states. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Options are listed but not related to prerequisites, consequences, or downstream states."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A problem representation can explicitly encode every dependency and consequence.", "slug": "problem_representation"}], "normalized_requirement": "Options are listed without prerequisite, consequence, or downstream-state relations.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Options are listed without prerequisite, consequence, or downstream-state relations.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record is a state better than all nearby alternatives that traps local search despite inferior distant regions.", "role_mapping": "Familiar moves -> local neighborhood; repeated local fixes -> trapped search; unexplored region -> better distant state.", "slug": "local_optimum", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b050_a13_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Exploration keeps returning to familiar moves or local fixes. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Exploration keeps returning to familiar moves or local fixes."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Local Optimum", "one_liner": "A point best within its neighborhood but not across the whole landscape.", "page_ref": "prime:local_optimum", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Familiar moves -> local neighborhood; repeated local fixes -> trapped search; unexplored region -> better distant state.", "slug": "local_optimum", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record is a state better than all nearby alternatives that traps local search despite inferior distant regions."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Exploration repeatedly returns to familiar moves or local fixes.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A problem space can specify all constraints consistently.", "slug": "problem_space"}], "residual_id": "r:problem_space_mapping:b050_a13_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b050_a13_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Constraints are invoked inconsistently or treated as obvious. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Constraints are invoked inconsistently or treated as obvious."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A problem space can specify all constraints consistently.", "slug": "problem_space"}], "normalized_requirement": "Constraints are invoked inconsistently or treated as obvious.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Constraints are invoked inconsistently or treated as obvious.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P090-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve multiple actors and one shared focal problem.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "At least two actors reason about the same focal problem or decision.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve perceived action possibilities, not merely different preferences over one shared set.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Each actor has a perceived set of moves available in that problem.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail cross-actor difference in possible moves.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The actors' perceived move sets differ.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Actors facing the same problem perceive different sets of possible moves.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "actors hold different perceived action spaces", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P090-C04-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Navigation can occur from one shared map and identical move set.", "slug": "navigation"}], "residual_id": "r:problem_space_mapping:b050_a13_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b050_a13_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when a group is stuck because the possible moves are implicit, scattered, or prematurely narrowed. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Different actors perceive different possible moves.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Different actors perceive different possible moves.", "Use this archetype when a group is stuck because the possible moves are implicit, scattered, or prematurely narrowed."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Navigation can occur from one shared map and identical move set.", "slug": "navigation"}], "normalized_requirement": "Different actors perceive different possible moves.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Different actors perceive different possible moves.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The problem feels vague, large, or overwhelming.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The problem feels vague, large, or overwhelming. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The problem feels vague, large, or overwhelming."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "The problem feels vague, large, or overwhelming."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 50, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-050", "ledger_sha256": "c4aff506422df2cdb85ce58aaab41ac9c161457f147aa3c2f3d18ca537774d95"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Procedural Fairness Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:procedural_fairness_design", "slug": "procedural_fairness_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 5, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a mismatch between decision authority and affected-party standing. Someone can decide, but the person affected by the decision cannot meaningfully understand the case, provide input, test evidence, trust the decision-maker, receive reasons, or seek review.\n\nThis produces familiar symptoms: surprise outcomes, unheard objections, unexplained decisions, inconsistent treatment, informal escalation, retaliation fears, and appeals that exist only on paper. The system may still claim fairness because it has a policy, a form, or a committee, but those mechanisms do not create procedural fairness unless they actually structure notice, voice, evidence, impartiality, reasons, consistency, review, and remedy.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A decision affects people, resources, rights, access, standing, or obligations, but the process gives affected parties too little notice, no meaningful voice, unclear evidence standards, biased or self-interested judgment, unexplained reasoning, inconsistent treatment, or no path for review and remedy."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record governs consequential decisions affecting a person's rights, interests, or status.", "role_mapping": "Impact -> deprivation or allocation; affected person -> party.", "slug": "procedural_fairness_due_process", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b050_a14_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Consequential impact. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Consequential impact"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Procedural Fairness (Due Process)", "one_liner": "Due process.", "page_ref": "prime:procedural_fairness_due_process", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Impact -> deprivation or allocation; affected person -> party.", "slug": "procedural_fairness_due_process", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record governs consequential decisions affecting a person's rights, interests, or status."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A decision has consequential impact on rights, resources, access, standing, or obligations.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record constrains an authority's consequential decision by notice, hearing, impartiality, and review rights for the affected party.", "role_mapping": "Powerful actor -> decision authority; weaker actor -> affected party.", "slug": "procedural_fairness_due_process", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b050_a14_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Asymmetric power. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Asymmetric power"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Procedural Fairness (Due Process)", "one_liner": "Due process.", "page_ref": "prime:procedural_fairness_due_process", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Powerful actor -> decision authority; weaker actor -> affected party.", "slug": "procedural_fairness_due_process", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record constrains an authority's consequential decision by notice, hearing, impartiality, and review rights for the affected party."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Decision power is asymmetric between authority and affected party.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires an opportunity to know and contest evidence before an impartial decision.", "role_mapping": "Disputed facts -> contestable evidence; standards -> decision rule.", "slug": "procedural_fairness_due_process", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b050_a14_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Disputed facts or standards. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Disputed facts or standards"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Procedural Fairness (Due Process)", "one_liner": "Due process.", "page_ref": "prime:procedural_fairness_due_process", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Disputed facts -> contestable evidence; standards -> decision rule.", "slug": "procedural_fairness_due_process", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires an opportunity to know and contest evidence before an impartial decision."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Material facts or governing standards are disputed.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record treats fair procedure and reason-giving as a source of warranted legitimacy independent of favorable outcome.", "role_mapping": "Legitimacy -> procedural acceptance; process -> due process.", "slug": "procedural_fairness_due_process", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b050_a14_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Legitimacy dependence. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Legitimacy dependence"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Procedural Fairness (Due Process)", "one_liner": "Due process.", "page_ref": "prime:procedural_fairness_due_process", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Legitimacy -> procedural acceptance; process -> due process.", "slug": "procedural_fairness_due_process", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record treats fair procedure and reason-giving as a source of warranted legitimacy independent of favorable outcome."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Acceptance and legitimacy of the outcome depend on the fairness of the procedure.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires appeal, review, or correction paths for erroneous decisions.", "role_mapping": "Error risk -> fallible adjudication; remedy -> review path.", "slug": "procedural_fairness_due_process", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b050_a14_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Reviewable error risk. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Reviewable error risk"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Procedural Fairness (Due Process)", "one_liner": "Due process.", "page_ref": "prime:procedural_fairness_due_process", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Error risk -> fallible adjudication; remedy -> review path.", "slug": "procedural_fairness_due_process", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires appeal, review, or correction paths for erroneous decisions."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The decision carries a meaningful risk of error that can be reviewed and remedied.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 50, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-050", "ledger_sha256": "c4aff506422df2cdb85ce58aaab41ac9c161457f147aa3c2f3d18ca537774d95"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Procedural Objectivity Warranting", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:procedural_objectivity_warranting", "slug": "procedural_objectivity_warranting"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 4 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A public or institutional claim is treated as objective even though its production, verification, source selection, framing, or correction path can be shaped by actors with a preferred outcome. The audience receives a claim with the social authority of objectivity, but the underlying procedure has not controlled preferred-outcome leakage.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A public or institutional claim is treated as objective even though its production, verification, source selection, framing, or correction path can be shaped by actors with a preferred outcome. The audience receives a claim with the social authority of objectivity, but the underlying procedure has not controlled preferred-outcome leakage."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record responds to interested human producers by requiring transparent sourcing, verification, independence, and correction procedures rather than personal neutrality.", "role_mapping": "Claim producer -> reporter/verifier; preferred outcome -> interest or bias; warrant -> objective procedure.", "slug": "journalistic_objectivity", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b050_a15_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The interests may be direct financial incentives, access dependency, ideology, relationship, status, speed, audience capture, or first-mover advantage. In this condition set, the requirement is: Reporters, verifiers, editors, experts, sources, sponsors, officials, or platforms have interests in the claim outcome.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Reporters, verifiers, editors, experts, reviewers, sources, sponsors, officials, or platforms have interests in the claim outcome."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Journalistic Objectivity", "one_liner": "A claim is licensed by a procedure whose authority depends on holding the verifier structurally outside the interests at stake, so preferred-outcome leakage is made expensive.", "page_ref": "prime:journalistic_objectivity", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Claim producer -> reporter/verifier; preferred outcome -> interest or bias; warrant -> objective procedure.", "slug": "journalistic_objectivity", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record responds to interested human producers by requiring transparent sourcing, verification, independence, and correction procedures rather than personal neutrality."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Reporters, verifiers, editors, experts, sources, sponsors, officials, or platforms have interests in the claim outcome.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P090-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve source proximity as the assessed property.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An evaluator assesses a claim using a source that is proximate to the events or evidence.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve independence as distinct from proximity.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Source independence concerns freedom from shared control, influence, or preferred-outcome leakage.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail the mistaken inference or conflation between the properties.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The evaluator treats proximity as establishing or substituting for independence.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "An evaluator mistakes source proximity for source independence.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "source proximity is mistaken for evidential independence", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P090-C05-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An objective reporting procedure can clearly distinguish proximity from independence.", "slug": "journalistic_objectivity"}], "residual_id": "r:procedural_objectivity_warranting:b050_a15_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b050_a15_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A source close to events may be useful but interested; a source independent of the conflict may lack direct knowledge. In this condition set, the requirement is: Source proximity and source independence are confused.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Source proximity and source independence are confused."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An objective reporting procedure can clearly distinguish proximity from independence.", "slug": "journalistic_objectivity"}], "normalized_requirement": "Source proximity and source independence are confused.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Source proximity and source independence are confused.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Journalistic objectivity can disclose and compare multiple legitimate frames rather than falsely present only one.", "slug": "journalistic_objectivity"}], "residual_id": "r:procedural_objectivity_warranting:b050_a15_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b050_a15_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Framing, omission, headline, and ordering choices often carry the real bias load. In this condition set, the requirement is: Several framings fit the evidence but one is presented as the only neutral framing.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The same evidence can support several framings, but one framing is made to look like the only neutral presentation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Journalistic objectivity can disclose and compare multiple legitimate frames rather than falsely present only one.", "slug": "journalistic_objectivity"}], "normalized_requirement": "Several framings fit the evidence but one is presented as the only neutral framing.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Several framings fit the evidence but one is presented as the only neutral framing.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Due process can provide review without any claimant attempting delay or suppression.", "slug": "procedural_fairness_due_process"}], "residual_id": "r:procedural_objectivity_warranting:b050_a15_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b050_a15_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The design must combine objectivity with bounded procedural fairness. In this condition set, the requirement is: Affected parties deserve correction rights but can use them to shape, delay, suppress, or reframe the claim.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Affected parties deserve response or correction rights but may use those rights to shape, delay, suppress, or reframe the claim."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Due process can provide review without any claimant attempting delay or suppression.", "slug": "procedural_fairness_due_process"}], "normalized_requirement": "Affected parties deserve correction rights but can use them to shape, delay, suppress, or reframe the claim.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Affected parties deserve correction rights but can use them to shape, delay, suppress, or reframe the claim.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A claim affects reputations, rights, resources, votes, safety, legitimacy, or institutional trust.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Objectivity matters most when audiences or decision makers rely on the claim under uncertainty. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: A claim affects reputations, rights, resources, votes, safety, legitimacy, or institutional trust. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A claim affects reputations, rights, resources, votes, safety, legitimacy, or institutional trust.", "Objectivity matters most when audiences or decision makers rely on the claim under uncertainty."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "A claim affects reputations, rights, resources, votes, safety, legitimacy, or institutional trust."}, {"display_text": "Claims will be repeated, indexed, quoted, litigated, moderated, audited, or used as downstream evidence.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The claim’s procedural warrant must travel with it or remain discoverable. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Claims will be repeated, indexed, quoted, litigated, moderated, audited, or used as downstream evidence. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Claims will be repeated, indexed, quoted, litigated, moderated, audited, or used as downstream evidence.", "The claim’s procedural warrant must travel with it or remain discoverable."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Claims will be repeated, indexed, quoted, litigated, moderated, audited, or used as downstream evidence."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 50, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-050", "ledger_sha256": "c4aff506422df2cdb85ce58aaab41ac9c161457f147aa3c2f3d18ca537774d95"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Proceduralization", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:proceduralization", "slug": "proceduralization"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 2 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 2}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is unstable recurrence. The same task keeps appearing, but the path through the task is carried by memory, local habit, status, or hidden expert judgment. Because the pathway is tacit, different performers start with different inputs, follow different steps, branch on different criteria, and end with different output standards.\n\nThis creates several downstream failures. Work cannot be transferred cleanly to new performers. Managers cannot tell whether failures came from bad judgment, missing information, unclear authority, or process design. Automation becomes difficult because edge cases that humans handled informally have not been named. Audit and accountability degrade because the system cannot show what was supposed to happen.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A task is performed inconsistently because its steps, inputs, decisions, handoffs, outputs, exceptions, or completion criteria are tacit, ambiguous, person-dependent, or improvised anew each time."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid script can be executed consistently by every performer.", "slug": "script"}], "residual_id": "r:proceduralization:b051_a01_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b051_a01_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The same recurring task is performed differently by different people, teams, shifts, or sites. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The same recurring task is performed differently by different people, teams, shifts, or sites."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid script can be executed consistently by every performer.", "slug": "script"}], "normalized_requirement": "The same recurring task is performed inconsistently across people, shifts, teams, or sites.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The same recurring task is performed inconsistently across people, shifts, teams, or sites.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P090-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a task and a procedural element governing its performance.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A task or process has procedural elements needed for successful completion.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve breakdown-to-failure direction, not merely a procedure observed after failure.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The selected procedural breakdown causes or materially produces a task failure.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires omission of a required procedural step.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A required step is skipped.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires omission of a required procedural check.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "A required check is forgotten.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires ambiguity in a procedural handoff.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "A handoff is unclear.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires misunderstanding of the criteria for task completion.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "Completion criteria are misunderstood.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A task failure is caused by one listed procedural breakdown.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "procedural breakdown causes task failure", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P090-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A script can be complete and followed without any skipped step or handoff failure.", "slug": "script"}], "residual_id": "r:proceduralization:b051_a01_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b051_a01_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Failures trace back to skipped steps, forgotten checks, unclear handoffs, or misunderstood completion criteria. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Failures trace back to skipped steps, forgotten checks, unclear handoffs, or misunderstood completion criteria."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "I attempted to preserve null_dereference plus the single qualifier while falsifying a complete DNF branch; the exact structural commitments and mapped roles left no such complete counterexample.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Null dereference", "one_liner": "The failure where code operates on a reference under the unstated assumption that the object exists, while the reference is in fact absent — so the defect is the missing existence-precondition check, not the absence itself.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:null_dereference", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O4"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "required_existence_check_was_forgotten", "predicate": "The required existence check was omitted because it was forgotten.", "rationale": "Independent exact-record review preserves the candidate's native roles and direction. The single context restriction fills only the identified gap and does not add a principal role or restate the trigger head."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "null_dereference"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "required_existence_check_was_forgotten"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "null_dereference", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P090-C06-U1", "why_it_fits": "The DSA directly supplies the required check and causal failure; one contingent fact identifies forgetting as the reason that check was absent."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Failures arise from skipped steps, forgotten checks, unclear handoffs, or misunderstood completion criteria.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A task must be delegated, trained, audited, scaled, automated, or transferred to a new context.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use Proceduralization when a recurring task is performed inconsistently, when training depends on shadowing a few experts, when failures come from skipped steps or unclear handoffs, or when a task must be delegated, audited, scaled, or automated. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: A task must be delegated, trained, audited, scaled, automated, or transferred to a new context. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A task must be delegated, trained, audited, scaled, automated, or transferred to a new context.", "Use Proceduralization when a recurring task is performed inconsistently, when training depends on shadowing a few experts, when failures come from skipped steps or unclear handoffs, or when a task must be delegated, audited, scaled, or automated."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "A task must be delegated, trained, audited, scaled, automated, or transferred to a new context."}, {"display_text": "A team wants repeatability without freezing all judgment.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: A team wants repeatability without freezing all judgment. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A team wants repeatability without freezing all judgment."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "A team wants repeatability without freezing all judgment."}, {"display_text": "Regulators, reviewers, or downstream users need evidence that a process was followed.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this deployment constraint: Regulators, reviewers, or downstream users need evidence that a process was followed. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Regulators, reviewers, or downstream users need evidence that a process was followed."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Regulators, reviewers, or downstream users need evidence that a process was followed."}, {"display_text": "The work is being prepared for software automation or scripted execution.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: The work is being prepared for software automation or scripted execution. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The work is being prepared for software automation or scripted execution."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The work is being prepared for software automation or scripted execution."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 51, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-051", "ledger_sha256": "58ae6ddf311482c0c1ea14c7ce009ce97dab242b0bd542d2aa55e0824e7b616b"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Process-Imprint Source Attribution", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:process_imprint_source_attribution", "slug": "process_imprint_source_attribution"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 2 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 2}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "An output must be attributed to a source, but explicit provenance, labels, custody records, or declarations are missing, unreliable, forgeable, or too coarse. Surface content alone may be copied, stylized, or shared across sources, so the system needs evidence from the production process itself: stable regularities that travel with the artifact because of how it was made.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "An output must be attributed to a source, but explicit provenance, labels, custody records, or declarations are missing, unreliable, forgeable, or too coarse. Surface content alone may be copied, stylized, or shared across sources, so the system needs evidence from the production process itself: stable regularities that travel with the artifact because of how it was made."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires stable measurable regularities imprinted by a production process and carried by its outputs.", "role_mapping": "Output features -> signature; equipment/workflow -> source process.", "slug": "production_signature", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b051_a02_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The output contains repeated measurable features that may be caused by production equipment, workflow, medium, authoring process, training pipeline, sensor, or material transformation. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The output contains repeated measurable features that may be caused by production equipment, workflow, medium, authoring process, training pipeline, sensor, or material transformation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Production Signature", "one_liner": "A production process involuntarily imprints stable regularities on its output, letting an analyst attribute the output to its source.", "page_ref": "prime:production_signature", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Output features -> signature; equipment/workflow -> source process.", "slug": "production_signature", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires stable measurable regularities imprinted by a production process and carried by its outputs."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "An output carries repeated measurable features caused by its production equipment, workflow, medium, pipeline, sensor, or material transformation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A production signature may supplement complete trustworthy metadata rather than compensate for its absence.", "slug": "production_signature"}], "residual_id": "r:process_imprint_source_attribution:b051_a02_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b051_a02_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Declared metadata, chain-of-custody records, or self-reports are absent, incomplete, or adversarially manipulable. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Declared metadata, chain-of-custody records, or self-reports are absent, incomplete, or adversarially manipulable."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A production signature may supplement complete trustworthy metadata rather than compensate for its absence.", "slug": "production_signature"}], "normalized_requirement": "Declared metadata, custody records, or self-reports are absent, incomplete, or manipulable.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Declared metadata, custody records, or self-reports are absent, incomplete, or manipulable.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The source or production process of an output matters for trust, accountability, safety, credit, enforcement, quality, or interpretation.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Surface content alone may be copied, stylized, or shared across sources, so the system needs evidence from the production process itself: stable regularities that travel with the artifact because of how it was made. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: The source or production process of an output matters for trust, accountability, safety, credit, enforcement, quality, or interpretation. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The source or production process of an output matters for trust, accountability, safety, credit, enforcement, quality, or interpretation.", "Surface content alone may be copied, stylized, or shared across sources, so the system needs evidence from the production process itself: stable regularities that travel with the artifact because of how it was made."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "The source or production process of an output matters for trust, accountability, safety, credit, enforcement, quality, or interpretation."}, {"display_text": "There is a reference corpus, exemplar set, candidate-source set, or negative-control population against which candidate signatures can be compared.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: There is a reference corpus, exemplar set, candidate-source set, or negative-control population against which candidate signatures can be compared. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["There is a reference corpus, exemplar set, candidate-source set, or negative-control population against which candidate signatures can be compared."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "There is a reference corpus, exemplar set, candidate-source set, or negative-control population against which candidate signatures can be compared."}, {"display_text": "Confounders such as shared templates, common tools, environmental residues, degradation, copying, or deliberate imitation can be tested or bounded.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: Confounders such as shared templates, common tools, environmental residues, degradation, copying, or deliberate imitation can be tested or bounded. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Confounders such as shared templates, common tools, environmental residues, degradation, copying, or deliberate imitation can be tested or bounded."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Confounders such as shared templates, common tools, environmental residues, degradation, copying, or deliberate imitation can be tested or bounded."}, {"display_text": "The downstream decision can tolerate probabilistic attribution rather than absolute proof.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this deployment constraint: The downstream decision can tolerate probabilistic attribution rather than absolute proof. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The downstream decision can tolerate probabilistic attribution rather than absolute proof."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The downstream decision can tolerate probabilistic attribution rather than absolute proof."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 51, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-051", "ledger_sha256": "58ae6ddf311482c0c1ea14c7ce009ce97dab242b0bd542d2aa55e0824e7b616b"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Productive Transition-Zone Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:productive_transition_zone_design", "slug": "productive_transition_zone_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Two regimes must interact, but a hard line causes brittle handoffs and missed recombination while full merger would destroy useful differences, overwhelm capacity, or spread hazards. Existing contact occurs at an unmanaged edge whose depth, exchange rules, local functions, burdens, and evolution are undefined.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Two regimes must interact, but a hard line causes brittle handoffs and missed recombination while full merger would destroy useful differences, overwhelm capacity, or spread hazards. Existing contact occurs at an unmanaged edge whose depth, exchange rules, local functions, burdens, and evolution are undefined."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires an interface zone where two distinct regimes repeatedly meet without losing their identities.", "role_mapping": "Regimes -> adjacent systems; meeting -> shared boundary zone.", "slug": "ecotone", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b051_a03_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Distinct regimes, disciplines, habitats, standards, jurisdictions, or operating modes meet repeatedly. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Distinct regimes, disciplines, habitats, standards, jurisdictions, or operating modes meet repeatedly."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Ecotone", "one_liner": "A transitional zone of measurable depth where two regimes overlap and mix, generating gradients, elevated exchange, and zone-specific structure that neither regime alone hosts.", "page_ref": "prime:ecotone", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Regimes -> adjacent systems; meeting -> shared boundary zone.", "slug": "ecotone", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires an interface zone where two distinct regimes repeatedly meet without losing their identities."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Distinct regimes, disciplines, habitats, standards, jurisdictions, or modes meet repeatedly.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires a transition zone with mixed membership, gradients, and emergent edge effects.", "role_mapping": "Interface -> ecotone; mixed state -> overlap composition.", "slug": "ecotone", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b051_a03_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The interface has enough interaction to produce gradients, mixed states, or edge-specific effects. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The interface has enough interaction to produce gradients, mixed states, or edge-specific effects."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Ecotone", "one_liner": "A transitional zone of measurable depth where two regimes overlap and mix, generating gradients, elevated exchange, and zone-specific structure that neither regime alone hosts.", "page_ref": "prime:ecotone", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Interface -> ecotone; mixed state -> overlap composition.", "slug": "ecotone", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires a transition zone with mixed membership, gradients, and emergent edge effects."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The interface produces gradients, mixed states, or edge-specific effects.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P090-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"], ["O1", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O7"], ["O1", "O3", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O8"], ["O1", "O3", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O9"], ["O1", "O3", "O9"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a boundary or transition zone connecting distinct regimes.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A transition zone mediates interaction between two distinct regimes.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This failure-state branch requires complete absence of the selected function.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The selected cross-boundary function is absent.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This failure-state branch requires fragile rather than robust function.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The selected cross-boundary function is too fragile to perform reliably.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This function branch requires translation across the boundary.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The deficient function is translation.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This function branch requires recombination in the transition zone.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The deficient function is recombination.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This function branch requires staged compatibility between regimes.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The deficient function is staged compatibility.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This function branch requires a nursery function.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The deficient function is a nursery function.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This function branch requires sensing at the transition zone.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The deficient function is sensing.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This function branch requires coordination across the boundary.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "The deficient function is coordination.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A transition zone lacks a robust instance of one listed cross-boundary function.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "transition zone has a missing or fragile cross-boundary function", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P090-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An ecotone can already perform robust translation, nursery, sensing, and recombination functions.", "slug": "ecotone"}], "residual_id": "r:productive_transition_zone_design:b051_a03_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b051_a03_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Translation, recombination, staged compatibility, nursery, sensing, or coordination functions are missing or fragile. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Translation, recombination, staged compatibility, nursery, sensing, or coordination functions are missing or fragile."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "I attempted to preserve handoff_loss plus the single qualifier while falsifying a complete DNF branch; the exact structural commitments and mapped roles left no such complete counterexample.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_BRIDGE", "name": "Handoff Loss", "one_liner": "Locate post-transition failures at the transfer relation itself: work crossing a boundary between actors arrives degraded because a bounded artifact cannot carry the sender's tacit state, so downstream decisions run on an impoverished reconstruction.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:handoff_loss", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "TYPE_SUBSUMPTION", "kind": "INTERPRETIVE_BRIDGE", "normalized_key": "actor_transfer_boundary_is_transition_zone", "predicate": "An actor-to-actor transfer boundary is a transition zone between their operating regimes.", "rationale": "Independent exact-record review preserves the candidate's native roles and direction. The single qualifier is candidate-anchored and atomic; the type bridge remains generally valid outside this edge."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "handoff_loss"}, {"kind": "INTERPRETIVE_BRIDGE", "value": "actor_transfer_boundary_is_transition_zone"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "handoff_loss", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P090-C07-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record supplies the boundary transfer and fragile translation spine; one general type bridge names an actor-to-actor transfer boundary as a transition zone."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Translation, recombination, staged compatibility, nursery, sensing, or coordination functions are absent or fragile.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An ecotone can exist without any tested alternative boundary or merger performing poorly.", "slug": "ecotone"}], "residual_id": "r:productive_transition_zone_design:b051_a03_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b051_a03_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A zero-width boundary, pure handoff, isolated bridge, or total integration performs poorly. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A zero-width boundary, pure handoff, isolated bridge, or total integration performs poorly."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An ecotone can exist without any tested alternative boundary or merger performing poorly.", "slug": "ecotone"}], "normalized_requirement": "A zero-width handoff, isolated bridge, or full merger performs poorly.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A zero-width handoff, isolated bridge, or full merger performs poorly.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The overlap can be bounded, monitored, governed, and reversed or remediated if necessary.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The design must preserve difference enough to sustain a gradient while allowing enough governed overlap to generate third-zone value. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: The overlap can be bounded, monitored, governed, and reversed or remediated if necessary. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The overlap can be bounded, monitored, governed, and reversed or remediated if necessary.", "The design must preserve difference enough to sustain a gradient while allowing enough governed overlap to generate third-zone value."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The overlap can be bounded, monitored, governed, and reversed or remediated if necessary."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 51, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-051", "ledger_sha256": "58ae6ddf311482c0c1ea14c7ce009ce97dab242b0bd542d2aa55e0824e7b616b"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Progress-Guarded Livelock Disruption", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:progress_guarded_livelock_disruption", "slug": "progress_guarded_livelock_disruption"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 5, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Coupled actors, processes, teams, controllers, or policies remain active and responsive, but their moves mutually cancel, reset, defer, or compensate for one another. The system consumes attention, time, resources, retries, or coordination bandwidth without reaching closure because every local adaptive response preserves the global stuck cycle.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Coupled actors, processes, teams, controllers, or policies remain active and responsive, but their moves mutually cancel, reset, defer, or compensate for one another. The system consumes attention, time, resources, retries, or coordination bandwidth without reaching closure because every local adaptive response preserves the global stuck cycle."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires active state changes and resource consumption without global progress.", "role_mapping": "Activity -> live transitions; flat completion -> no progress.", "slug": "livelock", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b051_a04_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Activity, retries, messages, negotiations, or state changes continue while the completion metric remains flat. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Activity, retries, messages, negotiations, or state changes continue while the completion metric remains flat."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Livelock", "one_liner": "Coupled agents stay active and responsive yet make no progress, their every move triggering a compensating move that locks the joint state in a futile cycle.", "page_ref": "prime:livelock", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Activity -> live transitions; flat completion -> no progress.", "slug": "livelock", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires active state changes and resource consumption without global progress."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Activity, retries, messages, negotiations, or state changes continue while completion remains flat.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires mutually responsive local actions that preserve a nonprogressing cycle.", "role_mapping": "Actor move -> local response; compensating move -> coupled cancellation.", "slug": "livelock", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b051_a04_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Each actor’s move is locally reasonable but triggers a compensating move by another actor. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Each actor’s move is locally reasonable but triggers a compensating move by another actor."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Livelock", "one_liner": "Coupled agents stay active and responsive yet make no progress, their every move triggering a compensating move that locks the joint state in a futile cycle.", "page_ref": "prime:livelock", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Actor move -> local response; compensating move -> coupled cancellation.", "slug": "livelock", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires mutually responsive local actions that preserve a nonprogressing cycle."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Each actor's locally reasonable move triggers a compensating move by another actor.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires recurrent active transitions through a cycle of states without terminal progress.", "role_mapping": "Joint states -> cycle states; repeated visits -> recurrence.", "slug": "livelock", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b051_a04_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The system repeatedly visits the same joint states, negotiation positions, lock-free retries, or operational configurations. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The system repeatedly visits the same joint states, negotiation positions, lock-free retries, or operational configurations."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Livelock", "one_liner": "Coupled agents stay active and responsive yet make no progress, their every move triggering a compensating move that locks the joint state in a futile cycle.", "page_ref": "prime:livelock", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Joint states -> cycle states; repeated visits -> recurrence.", "slug": "livelock", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires recurrent active transitions through a cycle of states without terminal progress."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The system repeatedly revisits the same joint states, positions, retries, or configurations.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The canonical pattern arises because each participant keeps yielding or adapting in response to the other, sustaining motion without progress.", "role_mapping": "Responsive behavior -> local adaptation; stable cycle -> livelock.", "slug": "livelock", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b051_a04_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Attempts to be polite, nonblocking, adaptive, or responsive make the cycle more stable instead of resolving it. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Attempts to be polite, nonblocking, adaptive, or responsive make the cycle more stable instead of resolving it."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Livelock", "one_liner": "Coupled agents stay active and responsive yet make no progress, their every move triggering a compensating move that locks the joint state in a futile cycle.", "page_ref": "prime:livelock", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Responsive behavior -> local adaptation; stable cycle -> livelock.", "slug": "livelock", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The canonical pattern arises because each participant keeps yielding or adapting in response to the other, sustaining motion without progress."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Polite, nonblocking, adaptive, or responsive behavior stabilizes the cycle rather than resolving it.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The defining distinction from deadlock is continued activity with no useful progress.", "role_mapping": "Moving actors -> live system; not blocked -> livelock rather than deadlock.", "slug": "livelock", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b051_a04_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Deadlock checks show that actors are not simply blocked; they are moving, yielding, or retrying. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Deadlock checks show that actors are not simply blocked; they are moving, yielding, or retrying."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Livelock", "one_liner": "Coupled agents stay active and responsive yet make no progress, their every move triggering a compensating move that locks the joint state in a futile cycle.", "page_ref": "prime:livelock", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Moving actors -> live system; not blocked -> livelock rather than deadlock.", "slug": "livelock", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The defining distinction from deadlock is continued activity with no useful progress."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Actors are moving, yielding, or retrying rather than deadlocked.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A livelock can persist at unchanged churn when capacity is added and need not have been capacity-tested.", "slug": "livelock"}], "residual_id": "r:progress_guarded_livelock_disruption:b051_a04_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b051_a04_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Adding capacity or speed increases churn without increasing completions. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Adding capacity or speed increases churn without increasing completions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A livelock can persist at unchanged churn when capacity is added and need not have been capacity-tested.", "slug": "livelock"}], "normalized_requirement": "More capacity or speed increases churn without increasing completions.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "More capacity or speed increases churn without increasing completions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Progress depends on breaking symmetry, choosing a winner/turn, or temporarily reducing responsiveness.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Local responsiveness protects actors from blocking or conflict, but global progress may require one actor, rule, or state to stop reciprocating long enough for a real transition to complete. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: Progress depends on breaking symmetry, choosing a winner/turn, or temporarily reducing responsiveness. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Progress depends on breaking symmetry, choosing a winner/turn, or temporarily reducing responsiveness.", "Local responsiveness protects actors from blocking or conflict, but global progress may require one actor, rule, or state to stop reciprocating long enough for a real transition to complete."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "Progress depends on breaking symmetry, choosing a winner/turn, or temporarily reducing responsiveness."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 51, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-051", "ledger_sha256": "58ae6ddf311482c0c1ea14c7ce009ce97dab242b0bd542d2aa55e0824e7b616b"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Progressive Disclosure", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:progressive_disclosure", "slug": "progressive_disclosure"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 5, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "People face more detail than they can use at the current moment. The relevant facts may exist, but they arrive too early, too densely, or without a path from overview to detail, causing overload, error, hesitation, abandonment, or superficial compliance.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "People face more detail than they can use at the current moment. The relevant facts may exist, but they arrive too early, too densely, or without a path from overview to detail, causing overload, error, hesitation, abandonment, or superficial compliance."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P090-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an information presentation and its users or audience.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An interface, document, or information surface presents a body of detail to users.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve full-detail exposure, not merely a dense partial view.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The presentation exposes all relevant detail rather than a selected subset.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail simultaneous exposure and absence of staged reveal.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The full detail is exposed at one time or stage without progressive staging.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "An information surface exposes all detail simultaneously without staging.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "all detail is exposed at once without staging", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P090-C08-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Layering already separates information into levels and need not expose all detail at once.", "slug": "layering"}], "residual_id": "r:progressive_disclosure:b051_a05_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b051_a05_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: All detail is shown at once. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["All detail is shown at once"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Layering already separates information into levels and need not expose all detail at once.", "slug": "layering"}], "normalized_requirement": "All detail is shown at once.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "All detail is shown at once.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A readiness window can concern timing for action within one uniformly prepared population.", "slug": "readiness_window"}], "residual_id": "r:progressive_disclosure:b051_a05_c2", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b051_a05_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: User readiness varies. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["User readiness varies"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A readiness window can concern timing for action within one uniformly prepared population.", "slug": "readiness_window"}], "normalized_requirement": "User readiness varies.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "User readiness varies.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P090-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a multistage task and information used within it.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A task has at least two distinguishable stages and uses information during performance.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve relevance as indexed to the current task stage.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The information has a relevance level relative to a task stage.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail cross-stage relevance variation rather than constant relevance.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The information's relevance differs between task stages.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "The relevance of information changes across stages of a task.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "information relevance varies by task stage", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P090-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A structural mismatch can remain constant across every task stage.", "slug": "representational_structure_mismatch"}], "residual_id": "r:progressive_disclosure:b051_a05_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b051_a05_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Information relevance changes by task stage. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Information relevance changes by task stage"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A structural mismatch can remain constant across every task stage.", "slug": "representational_structure_mismatch"}], "normalized_requirement": "Information relevance changes by task stage.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Information relevance changes by task stage.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Minimum necessary disclosure can permanently withhold nonessential information and need not preserve rarely necessary detail.", "slug": "minimum_necessary_disclosure"}], "residual_id": "r:progressive_disclosure:b051_a05_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b051_a05_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Advanced or rare information is necessary but not always relevant. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Advanced or rare information is necessary but not always relevant"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Minimum necessary disclosure can permanently withhold nonessential information and need not preserve rarely necessary detail.", "slug": "minimum_necessary_disclosure"}], "normalized_requirement": "Advanced or rare information is necessary but not always relevant.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Advanced or rare information is necessary but not always relevant.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Summary and substance can diverge without the summary being necessary or the full explanation remaining accessible.", "slug": "summary_substance_divergence"}], "residual_id": "r:progressive_disclosure:b051_a05_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b051_a05_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A summary is needed but cannot safely replace the full explanation. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A summary is needed but cannot safely replace the full explanation"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Summary and substance can diverge without the summary being necessary or the full explanation remaining accessible.", "slug": "summary_substance_divergence"}], "normalized_requirement": "A summary is needed but cannot safely replace the full explanation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A summary is needed but cannot safely replace the full explanation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Users abandon or misuse the system before reaching the right detail.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Users abandon or misuse the system before reaching the right detail. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Users abandon or misuse the system before reaching the right detail"]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Users abandon or misuse the system before reaching the right detail"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 51, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-051", "ledger_sha256": "58ae6ddf311482c0c1ea14c7ce009ce97dab242b0bd542d2aa55e0824e7b616b"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Progressive Fidelity Increase", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:progressive_fidelity_increase", "slug": "progressive_fidelity_increase"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 3 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a mismatch between the fidelity of the representation and the maturity of the decision. Low fidelity is cheap and clarifying, but can hide important constraints. High fidelity can be more realistic, but it can also be expensive, fragile, difficult to interpret, and falsely persuasive.\n\nThe project fails when the team treats fidelity as a vibe: more detail feels more serious, less detail feels more agile, and no one can say what question the next fidelity level is supposed to answer. Progressive Fidelity Increase converts that vague preference into a sequence of fidelity levels, validation checkpoints, escalation criteria, and stop rules.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A team either stays too crude for too long or jumps to high fidelity before the uncertainty justifies the cost."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Refinement can improve an inexpensive artifact with no high-fidelity cost barrier.", "slug": "refinement"}], "residual_id": "r:progressive_fidelity_increase:b051_a06_c1", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b051_a06_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Full-fidelity analysis, design, or implementation would be expensive, slow, cognitively overwhelming, or premature. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Full-fidelity analysis, design, or implementation would be expensive, slow, cognitively overwhelming, or premature."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Refinement can improve an inexpensive artifact with no high-fidelity cost barrier.", "slug": "refinement"}], "normalized_requirement": "Full-fidelity work is expensive, slow, overwhelming, or premature.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Full-fidelity work is expensive, slow, overwhelming, or premature.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record uses a deliberately incomplete representation for cheap early learning before increasing realism to answer later questions.", "role_mapping": "Low-fidelity model -> prototype; later operational question -> fidelity-dependent validation.", "slug": "design_prototyping", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b051_a06_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A low-fidelity model or prototype is useful for early learning but cannot answer later questions about feasibility, realism, edge cases, or operational readiness. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A low-fidelity model or prototype is useful for early learning but cannot answer later questions about feasibility, realism, edge cases, or operational readiness."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Design Prototyping", "one_liner": "Early models for testing.", "page_ref": "prime:design_prototyping", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Low-fidelity model -> prototype; later operational question -> fidelity-dependent validation.", "slug": "design_prototyping", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record uses a deliberately incomplete representation for cheap early learning before increasing realism to answer later questions."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A low-fidelity prototype supports early learning but cannot answer later feasibility or operational questions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A prototype can be cheap to refine and clearly recognized as non-transferable, avoiding both tensions.", "slug": "design_prototyping"}], "residual_id": "r:progressive_fidelity_increase:b051_a06_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b051_a06_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Each added detail has cost, but staying at low fidelity risks false confidence, oversimplification, or poor transfer to real conditions. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Each added detail has cost, but staying at low fidelity risks false confidence, oversimplification, or poor transfer to real conditions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A prototype can be cheap to refine and clearly recognized as non-transferable, avoiding both tensions.", "slug": "design_prototyping"}], "normalized_requirement": "Added detail costs resources while persistent low fidelity creates false confidence or poor transfer.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Added detail costs resources while persistent low fidelity creates false confidence or poor transfer.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Teams are debating fidelity as a preference rather than tying it to uncertainty, decision stakes, or validation evidence.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Progressive Fidelity Increase converts that vague preference into a sequence of fidelity levels, validation checkpoints, escalation criteria, and stop rules. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Teams are debating fidelity as a preference rather than tying it to uncertainty, decision stakes, or validation evidence. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Teams are debating fidelity as a preference rather than tying it to uncertainty, decision stakes, or validation evidence.", "Progressive Fidelity Increase converts that vague preference into a sequence of fidelity levels, validation checkpoints, escalation criteria, and stop rules."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Teams are debating fidelity as a preference rather than tying it to uncertainty, decision stakes, or validation evidence."}, {"display_text": "The project needs a path from concept to operational readiness without treating every intermediate artifact as final.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The project fails when the team treats fidelity as a vibe: more detail feels more serious, less detail feels more agile, and no one can say what question the next fidelity level is supposed to answer. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: The project needs a path from concept to operational readiness without treating every intermediate artifact as final. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The project needs a path from concept to operational readiness without treating every intermediate artifact as final.", "The project fails when the team treats fidelity as a vibe: more detail feels more serious, less detail feels more agile, and no one can say what question the next fidelity level is supposed to answer."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The project needs a path from concept to operational readiness without treating every intermediate artifact as final."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 51, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-051", "ledger_sha256": "58ae6ddf311482c0c1ea14c7ce009ce97dab242b0bd542d2aa55e0824e7b616b"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Progressive Narrowing", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:progressive_narrowing", "slug": "progressive_narrowing"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 3 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is excess unresolved possibility. The system has more candidates than it can compare, test, or act on, but the candidates cannot be collapsed safely by intuition alone. Without a staged process, one of two failures tends to occur.\n\nFirst, the group may never narrow. It revisits the same broad list repeatedly, consumes attention, and postpones action because no stage has authority to remove anything. Second, the group may narrow invisibly. Candidates disappear because someone loses interest, a meeting runs out of time, a familiar option feels safer, or a powerful actor prefers one path. In that case the set shrinks, but the convergence is not trustworthy.\n\nProgressive Narrowing solves this by making reduction explicit, staged, and evidence-sensitive.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A problem begins with many possible options, hypotheses, designs, candidates, explanations, or issues, and the system cannot act well because direct selection is premature while undifferentiated variety is overwhelming."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "High dimensionality can impair distance or sample complexity without there being discrete options for selection.", "slug": "curse_of_dimensionality"}], "residual_id": "r:progressive_narrowing:b051_a07_c1", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b051_a07_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when a problem begins with many possible options, hypotheses, designs, applicants, vendors, issues, or explanations, and the group cannot responsibly evaluate all of them at full depth. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The option space is too large for full-depth evaluation.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The option space is too large for full-depth evaluation", "Use this archetype when a problem begins with many possible options, hypotheses, designs, applicants, vendors, issues, or explanations, and the group cannot responsibly evaluate all of them at full depth."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "High dimensionality can impair distance or sample complexity without there being discrete options for selection.", "slug": "curse_of_dimensionality"}], "normalized_requirement": "The option space is too large for full-depth evaluation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The option space is too large for full-depth evaluation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A stage-gate process may be used even when early commitment would be accurate but financially imprudent.", "slug": "stage_gate_process"}], "residual_id": "r:progressive_narrowing:b051_a07_c2", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b051_a07_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Early commitment would be biased or fragile. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Early commitment would be biased or fragile"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A stage-gate process may be used even when early commitment would be accurate but financially imprudent.", "slug": "stage_gate_process"}], "normalized_requirement": "Early commitment would be biased or fragile.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Early commitment would be biased or fragile.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record partitions commitment into evidence-gated stages with increasing investment and explicit continuation or kill decisions.", "role_mapping": "Evidence stages -> gates; option narrowing -> funnel of kills.", "slug": "stage_gate_process", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b051_a07_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Different kinds of evidence become available at different stages. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Different kinds of evidence become available at different stages"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Stage Gate Process", "one_liner": "Partition a long commitment into evidence-gated stages with escalating commitment and a funnel of kills.", "page_ref": "prime:stage_gate_process", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Evidence stages -> gates; option narrowing -> funnel of kills.", "slug": "stage_gate_process", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record partitions commitment into evidence-gated stages with increasing investment and explicit continuation or kill decisions."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Different evidence becomes available at different stages.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Stakeholders need a defensible trail from broad consideration to final selection.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this deployment constraint: Stakeholders need a defensible trail from broad consideration to final selection. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders need a defensible trail from broad consideration to final selection"]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Stakeholders need a defensible trail from broad consideration to final selection"}, {"display_text": "The process needs convergence without losing the ability to correct mistakes.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: The process needs convergence without losing the ability to correct mistakes. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The process needs convergence without losing the ability to correct mistakes"]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The process needs convergence without losing the ability to correct mistakes"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 51, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-051", "ledger_sha256": "58ae6ddf311482c0c1ea14c7ce009ce97dab242b0bd542d2aa55e0824e7b616b"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Progressive Stressor Conditioning", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:progressive_stressor_conditioning", "slug": "progressive_stressor_conditioning"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A person, organism, team, system, or ecosystem needs durable capacity, but current design optimizes for immediate ease, smooth performance, or complete protection from difficulty. As a result, capacity fails to consolidate, transfer is weak, fragility accumulates, or future demands exceed what the system has practiced adapting to. The opposite failure is also common: stress is imposed without dose control, recovery, consent, or measurement, producing damage rather than adaptation.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A person, organism, team, system, or ecosystem needs durable capacity, but current design optimizes for immediate ease, smooth performance, or complete protection from difficulty. As a result, capacity fails to consolidate, transfer is weak, fragility accumulates, or future demands exceed what the system has practiced adapting to. The opposite failure is also common: stress is imposed without dose control, recovery, consent, or measurement, producing damage rather than adaptation."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A stress-adaptation program can distinguish immediate performance from durable capacity correctly.", "slug": "stressor_induced_adaptation"}], "residual_id": "r:progressive_stressor_conditioning:b051_a08_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b051_a08_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Immediate performance is being mistaken for durable learning, strength, tolerance, resilience, or transfer. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Immediate performance is being mistaken for durable learning, strength, tolerance, resilience, or transfer."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A stress-adaptation program can distinguish immediate performance from durable capacity correctly.", "slug": "stressor_induced_adaptation"}], "normalized_requirement": "Immediate performance is mistaken for durable capacity, tolerance, resilience, or transfer.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Immediate performance is mistaken for durable capacity, tolerance, resilience, or transfer.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires a bounded stressor to trigger compensatory repair or adaptation that increases later capacity.", "role_mapping": "Bounded challenge -> stress dose; capacity change -> adaptation.", "slug": "stressor_induced_adaptation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b051_a08_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The system can adapt to bounded challenge through feedback, repair, consolidation, or structural change. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The system can adapt to bounded challenge through feedback, repair, consolidation, or structural change."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Stressor Induced Adaptation", "one_liner": "Bounded stress that costs short-term performance to build durable long-term capacity (hormesis, progressive overload, desirable difficulties).", "page_ref": "prime:stressor_induced_adaptation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Bounded challenge -> stress dose; capacity change -> adaptation.", "slug": "stressor_induced_adaptation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires a bounded stressor to trigger compensatory repair or adaptation that increases later capacity."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The system can adapt to bounded challenge through feedback, repair, consolidation, or structural change.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires a hormetic dose region: too little produces no adaptation and too much causes damage.", "role_mapping": "Dose window -> adaptive range; excessive stress -> overload.", "slug": "stressor_induced_adaptation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b051_a08_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: There is a plausible dose window where stress is difficult enough to signal adaptation but not so intense that it causes injury, trauma, collapse, or disengagement. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["There is a plausible dose window where stress is difficult enough to signal adaptation but not so intense that it causes injury, trauma, collapse, or disengagement."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Stressor Induced Adaptation", "one_liner": "Bounded stress that costs short-term performance to build durable long-term capacity (hormesis, progressive overload, desirable difficulties).", "page_ref": "prime:stressor_induced_adaptation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Dose window -> adaptive range; excessive stress -> overload.", "slug": "stressor_induced_adaptation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires a hormetic dose region: too little produces no adaptation and too much causes damage."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A dose window exists between an adaptation signal and injury, collapse, or disengagement.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires repeated, progressively dosed challenge followed by recovery for supercompensating capacity.", "role_mapping": "Repeated exposure -> conditioning cycles; recovery -> repair interval.", "slug": "stressor_induced_adaptation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b051_a08_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Capacity gains require repeated exposure, variation, progression, and recovery rather than one-time instruction or protection. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Capacity gains require repeated exposure, variation, progression, and recovery rather than one-time instruction or protection."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Stressor Induced Adaptation", "one_liner": "Bounded stress that costs short-term performance to build durable long-term capacity (hormesis, progressive overload, desirable difficulties).", "page_ref": "prime:stressor_induced_adaptation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Repeated exposure -> conditioning cycles; recovery -> repair interval.", "slug": "stressor_induced_adaptation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires repeated, progressively dosed challenge followed by recovery for supercompensating capacity."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Capacity gains require repeated exposure, variation, progression, and recovery rather than one-time protection.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A conditioning program can occur in an appropriately challenging environment that is not overprotected or brittle.", "slug": "stressor_induced_adaptation"}], "residual_id": "r:progressive_stressor_conditioning:b051_a08_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b051_a08_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The current environment is overprotected, under-practiced, brittle, or optimized for easy metrics. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The current environment is overprotected, under-practiced, brittle, or optimized for easy metrics."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A conditioning program can occur in an appropriately challenging environment that is not overprotected or brittle.", "slug": "stressor_induced_adaptation"}], "normalized_requirement": "The current environment is overprotected, under-practiced, brittle, or optimized for easy metrics.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The current environment is overprotected, under-practiced, brittle, or optimized for easy metrics.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Stakeholders need to justify temporary performance loss, discomfort, slower acquisition, or local inefficiency as part of a governed long-term capacity strategy.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The stressor that damages short-term performance may be exactly what builds long-term capacity, but only if it is bounded, sensed, recovered from, and converted into retained adaptation. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: Stakeholders need to justify temporary performance loss, discomfort, slower acquisition, or local inefficiency as part of a governed long-term capacity strategy. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders need to justify temporary performance loss, discomfort, slower acquisition, or local inefficiency as part of a governed long-term capacity strategy.", "The stressor that damages short-term performance may be exactly what builds long-term capacity, but only if it is bounded, sensed, recovered from, and converted into retained adaptation."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Stakeholders need to justify temporary performance loss, discomfort, slower acquisition, or local inefficiency as part of a governed long-term capacity strategy."}, {"display_text": "There is risk that leaders, teachers, coaches, or managers will misuse stress rhetoric to justify chronic overload or coercion.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this deployment constraint: There is risk that leaders, teachers, coaches, or managers will misuse stress rhetoric to justify chronic overload or coercion. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["There is risk that leaders, teachers, coaches, or managers will misuse stress rhetoric to justify chronic overload or coercion."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "There is risk that leaders, teachers, coaches, or managers will misuse stress rhetoric to justify chronic overload or coercion."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 51, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-051", "ledger_sha256": "58ae6ddf311482c0c1ea14c7ce009ce97dab242b0bd542d2aa55e0824e7b616b"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Property Rights Bundle Governance", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:property_rights_bundle_governance", "slug": "property_rights_bundle_governance"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A resource is governed by vague, overlapping, unenforced, overexclusive, underexclusive, or misallocated claims. Participants speak of ownership or rights as if they were singular, while actual use, exclusion, transfer, benefit, stewardship duties, liability, access exceptions, and public-interest limits are contested or hidden. The result can be conflict, underinvestment, overuse, exclusion, holdout power, anti-commons fragmentation, free riding, externalized harm, or illegitimate dispossession.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A resource is governed by vague, overlapping, unenforced, overexclusive, underexclusive, or misallocated claims. Participants speak of ownership or rights as if they were singular, while actual use, exclusion, transfer, benefit, stewardship duties, liability, access exceptions, and public-interest limits are contested or hidden. The result can be conflict, underinvestment, overuse, exclusion, holdout power, anti-commons fragmentation, free riding, externalized harm, or illegitimate dispossession."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A property-rights system can explicitly specify use, exclusion, transfer, income, duty, and liability incidents.", "slug": "property_rights"}], "residual_id": "r:property_rights_bundle_governance:b051_a09_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b051_a09_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Clarify which stick in the bundle is being claimed. In this condition set, the requirement is: Ownership is asserted while the specific entitlement is unclear.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Ownership is asserted but the specific entitlement is unclear."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A property-rights system can explicitly specify use, exclusion, transfer, income, duty, and liability incidents.", "slug": "property_rights"}], "normalized_requirement": "Ownership is asserted while the specific entitlement is unclear.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Ownership is asserted while the specific entitlement is unclear.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P090-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an exclusion entitlement over a focal resource.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An actor holds or exercises a right to exclude others from a resource.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an actual incompatibility, not merely coexistence of private and public claims.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Exercising that exclusion right conflicts with the selected public-interest constraint.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires conflict between exclusion and public access.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The conflicting constraint is public access.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires conflict between exclusion and basic-needs access.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The conflicting constraint is satisfaction of basic needs.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires conflict between exclusion and equitable treatment or distribution.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The conflicting constraint is equity.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires conflict between exclusion and an environmental constraint.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The conflicting constraint is environmental protection.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires conflict between exclusion and shared-infrastructure use.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The conflicting constraint concerns shared infrastructure.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A right to exclude conflicts with one listed public-interest constraint.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "exclusion right conflicts with a public-interest constraint", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P090-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A property right can concern a resource with no public-access or equity conflict.", "slug": "property_rights"}], "residual_id": "r:property_rights_bundle_governance:b051_a09_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b051_a09_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Limits and exceptions become central. In this condition set, the requirement is: Exclusion rights conflict with public access, basic needs, equity, environment, or shared infrastructure.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A right to exclude conflicts with public access, basic needs, equity, environmental constraints, or shared infrastructure."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A property right can concern a resource with no public-access or equity conflict.", "slug": "property_rights"}], "normalized_requirement": "Exclusion rights conflict with public access, basic needs, equity, environment, or shared infrastructure.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Exclusion rights conflict with public access, basic needs, equity, environment, or shared infrastructure.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires multiple independent exclusion rights whose assembly costs cause systematic underuse.", "role_mapping": "Fragmented rights -> exclusion holders; holdout -> assembly failure; resource -> underused asset.", "slug": "anti_commons_tragedy", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b051_a09_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Consolidation, clearance, or compulsory coordination may be needed. In this condition set, the requirement is: Fragmented exclusion rights create holdouts, vetoes, anti-commons effects, or transaction barriers.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Overlapping or fragmented rights create holdouts, veto points, anti-commons effects, or transaction-cost barriers."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Anti-Commons Tragedy", "one_liner": "A resource is systematically under-used because too many independent agents each hold a right to exclude and assembling their consents is too costly, so the resource sits idle even though every party would benefit from putting it to use — the formal dual of the commons.", "page_ref": "prime:anti_commons_tragedy", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Fragmented rights -> exclusion holders; holdout -> assembly failure; resource -> underused asset.", "slug": "anti_commons_tragedy", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires multiple independent exclusion rights whose assembly costs cause systematic underuse."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Fragmented exclusion rights create holdouts, vetoes, anti-commons effects, or transaction barriers.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires an actor to receive a collective benefit without contributing its share.", "role_mapping": "Weak contribution -> noncontribution; shared resource -> collective good.", "slug": "free_riding", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The exact record requires open access to a subtractable resource, producing individually rational overuse and depletion.", "role_mapping": "Weak exclusion -> open access; resource -> commons; depletion -> aggregate loss.", "slug": "tragedy_of_the_commons", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b051_a09_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is the commons route through the parent pattern. In this condition set, the requirement is: Open access or weak contribution rules create free riding, depletion, pollution, or underprovision.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Open access, weak exclusion, or weak contribution rules create free riding, depletion, pollution, or underprovision."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Free Riding", "one_liner": "The systematic under-provision that results when individuals can enjoy a non-excludable shared good without contributing proportionately to producing it.", "page_ref": "prime:free_riding", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Weak contribution -> noncontribution; shared resource -> collective good.", "slug": "free_riding", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires an actor to receive a collective benefit without contributing its share."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Tragedy of the Commons", "one_liner": "Resource depletion from self-interest.", "page_ref": "prime:tragedy_of_the_commons", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Weak exclusion -> open access; resource -> commons; depletion -> aggregate loss.", "slug": "tragedy_of_the_commons", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires open access to a subtractable resource, producing individually rational overuse and depletion."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Open access or weak contribution rules create free riding, depletion, pollution, or underprovision.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P090-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a decomposable claim or bundle of entitlement incidents.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A rights claim contains multiple incidents such as use, exclusion, benefit, duty, or liability.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve uncertainty about transaction scope, not a fully specified transfer.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Which incidents move with the claim is uncertain.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires uncertainty arising in a transfer.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The claim moves through transfer.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires uncertainty arising in inheritance.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The claim moves through inheritance.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires uncertainty arising in licensing.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The claim moves through licensing.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires uncertainty arising in leasing.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The claim moves through leasing.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires uncertainty arising in delegation.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The claim moves through delegation.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A listed rights transaction leaves unclear which entitlement incidents move with a claim.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "rights transaction leaves transferred entitlement incidents ambiguous", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P090-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A property-rights bundle can specify transfer scope exactly.", "slug": "property_rights"}], "residual_id": "r:property_rights_bundle_governance:b051_a09_c7", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b051_a09_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Title chain and encumbrance records are required. In this condition set, the requirement is: Transfer, inheritance, licensing, leasing, or delegation leaves unclear which incidents move with the claim.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Transfer, inheritance, licensing, leasing, or delegation creates uncertainty about what moves with the claim."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A property-rights bundle can specify transfer scope exactly.", "slug": "property_rights"}], "normalized_requirement": "Transfer, inheritance, licensing, leasing, or delegation leaves unclear which incidents move with the claim.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Transfer, inheritance, licensing, leasing, or delegation leaves unclear which incidents move with the claim.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires an actor's action to impose uncompensated costs or benefits on parties outside the transaction.", "role_mapping": "Entitlement exercise -> action; outside cost -> external effect; affected party -> third party.", "slug": "externality", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b051_a09_c8", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Duties and liability must be internalized. In this condition set, the requirement is: A claimed entitlement lets one party impose costs outside the bundle.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Externalities show that the claimed entitlement lets one party impose costs outside the bundle."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Externality", "one_liner": "Spillover effects.", "page_ref": "prime:externality", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Entitlement exercise -> action; outside cost -> external effect; affected party -> third party.", "slug": "externality", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires an actor's action to impose uncompensated costs or benefits on parties outside the transaction."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A claimed entitlement lets one party impose costs outside the bundle.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [8], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A resource has multiple potential users, claimants, duty bearers, or affected parties.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The bundle must separate access, use, exclusion, transfer, benefit, and obligation. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: A resource has multiple potential users, claimants, duty bearers, or affected parties. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A resource has multiple potential users, claimants, duty bearers, or affected parties.", "The bundle must separate access, use, exclusion, transfer, benefit, and obligation."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "A resource has multiple potential users, claimants, duty bearers, or affected parties."}, {"display_text": "Actors need stable expectations before investing labor, care, capital, knowledge, or stewardship in a resource.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Unstable entitlements reduce maintenance and long-term commitment. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: Actors need stable expectations before investing labor, care, capital, knowledge, or stewardship in a resource. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Actors need stable expectations before investing labor, care, capital, knowledge, or stewardship in a resource.", "Unstable entitlements reduce maintenance and long-term commitment."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Actors need stable expectations before investing labor, care, capital, knowledge, or stewardship in a resource."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 51, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-051", "ledger_sha256": "58ae6ddf311482c0c1ea14c7ce009ce97dab242b0bd542d2aa55e0824e7b616b"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Proportion / Scale Calibration", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:proportion_scale_calibration", "slug": "proportion_scale_calibration"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 4 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Elements are sized independently or by inherited ratios without a controlled relation to hierarchy, use, bodies, structure, viewing distance, medium, or cross-context translation. The result may look harmonious in one artifact while becoming illegible, awkward, unsafe, wasteful, or emotionally wrong elsewhere.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Elements are sized independently or by inherited ratios without a controlled relation to hierarchy, use, bodies, structure, viewing distance, medium, or cross-context translation. The result may look harmonious in one artifact while becoming illegible, awkward, unsafe, wasteful, or emotionally wrong elsewhere."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires relative size relations to organize hierarchy, harmony, emphasis, fit, or expressive effect.", "role_mapping": "Dimensions -> element sizes; communicated relation -> proportion.", "slug": "proportion_scale", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b051_a10_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Relative dimensions communicate importance, fit, hierarchy, identity, or emotional tone. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Relative dimensions communicate importance, fit, hierarchy, identity, or emotional tone."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Proportion and Scale", "one_liner": "Relative size relationships.", "page_ref": "prime:proportion_scale", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Dimensions -> element sizes; communicated relation -> proportion.", "slug": "proportion_scale", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires relative size relations to organize hierarchy, harmony, emphasis, fit, or expressive effect."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Relative dimensions communicate importance, fit, hierarchy, identity, or emotional tone.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A proportional composition can remain in one artifact and one viewing context.", "slug": "proportion_scale"}], "residual_id": "r:proportion_scale_calibration:b051_a10_c2", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b051_a10_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A design must move across bodies, devices, distances, sites, products, or fabrication processes. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A design must move across bodies, devices, distances, sites, products, or fabrication processes."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A proportional composition can remain in one artifact and one viewing context.", "slug": "proportion_scale"}], "normalized_requirement": "A design must translate across bodies, devices, distances, sites, products, or fabrication processes.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A design must translate across bodies, devices, distances, sites, products, or fabrication processes.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P090-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve local size adjustment inside a broader sizing system.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A team locally adjusts sizes within a broader scale or proportion system.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve repeated adjustment rather than one isolated correction.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The hand-tuning occurs repeatedly across elements or contexts.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve hand-tuning as the cause of cross-context inconsistency.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The hand-tuning creates local exceptions that are inconsistent with one another or the broader system.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Repeated hand-tuning of element sizes creates inconsistent local exceptions.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "local hand-tuning produces inconsistent scale exceptions", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P090-C13-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A proportion system can be generated consistently from one explicit ratio rule.", "slug": "proportion_scale"}], "residual_id": "r:proportion_scale_calibration:b051_a10_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b051_a10_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Teams repeatedly hand-tune sizes and create inconsistent local exceptions. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Teams repeatedly hand-tune sizes and create inconsistent local exceptions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A proportion system can be generated consistently from one explicit ratio rule.", "slug": "proportion_scale"}], "normalized_requirement": "Teams hand-tune sizes and create inconsistent local exceptions.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Teams hand-tune sizes and create inconsistent local exceptions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Formal proportions can fit content, accessibility, structure, and use simultaneously.", "slug": "proportion_scale"}], "residual_id": "r:proportion_scale_calibration:b051_a10_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b051_a10_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A consistent proportion grammar creates coherence and efficient reuse, but real contexts differ in body, medium, material, content, distance, structure, symbolism, and accessibility. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A formal ratio system conflicts with content, accessibility, structure, or use.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A formal ratio system conflicts with content, accessibility, structure, or use.", "A consistent proportion grammar creates coherence and efficient reuse, but real contexts differ in body, medium, material, content, distance, structure, symbolism, and accessibility."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Formal proportions can fit content, accessibility, structure, and use simultaneously.", "slug": "proportion_scale"}], "normalized_requirement": "A formal ratio system conflicts with content, accessibility, structure, or use.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A formal ratio system conflicts with content, accessibility, structure, or use.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Scale exaggeration or compression is central to interpretation and needs explicit safeguards.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this deployment constraint: Scale exaggeration or compression is central to interpretation and needs explicit safeguards. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Scale exaggeration or compression is central to interpretation and needs explicit safeguards."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Scale exaggeration or compression is central to interpretation and needs explicit safeguards."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 51, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-051", "ledger_sha256": "58ae6ddf311482c0c1ea14c7ce009ce97dab242b0bd542d2aa55e0824e7b616b"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Proportional Response Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:proportional_response_design", "slug": "proportional_response_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a mismatch between graded inputs and uncalibrated responses. The system sees cases of different size, seriousness, demand, or need, but it responds through blunt uniformity, improvised discretion, symbolic escalation, or arbitrary tables.\n\nThis mismatch shows up in two opposite ways. In one direction, the system overreacts: a small mistake receives a severe sanction, a small load increase receives a large process change, or a minor support request consumes scarce expert attention. In the other direction, the system underreacts: major incidents are handled like routine issues, severe needs receive generic support, or large users consume far more capacity than the rule accounts for.\n\nA second problem is legitimacy. When there is no visible scaling rule, people cannot tell whether a response is fair, biased, accidental, or politically driven. Operators also cannot learn from experience because each case looks like an exception rather than evidence for recalibration.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system receives inputs of differing magnitude—severity, demand, use, risk, need, harm, exposure, workload, or error—but responds with inconsistent, arbitrary, flat, excessive, or underpowered action."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Elasticity measures response sensitivity but does not require a normative response rule or any desired proportionality.", "slug": "elasticity"}], "residual_id": "r:proportional_response_design:b051_a11_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b051_a11_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The input varies by degree rather than by simple yes/no category, and response intensity should vary with it. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The input varies by degree rather than by simple yes/no category, and response intensity should vary with it."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Elasticity measures response sensitivity but does not require a normative response rule or any desired proportionality.", "slug": "elasticity"}], "normalized_requirement": "Input varies by degree and response intensity should track it.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Input varies by degree and response intensity should track it.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid proportionality rule already varies response and need not exhibit a harmful flat response.", "slug": "proportionality"}], "residual_id": "r:proportional_response_design:b051_a11_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b051_a11_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Equal response to unequal cases creates waste, unfairness, overload, insufficient protection, or loss of legitimacy. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Equal response to unequal cases creates waste, unfairness, overload, insufficient protection, or loss of legitimacy."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid proportionality rule already varies response and need not exhibit a harmful flat response.", "slug": "proportionality"}], "normalized_requirement": "Equal response to unequal cases creates waste, unfairness, overload, underprotection, or illegitimacy.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Equal response to unequal cases creates waste, unfairness, overload, underprotection, or illegitimacy.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P090-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve discretionary response selection over cases or case outcomes.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Operators use discretion to select responses or burdens across cases.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail absence of a stable proportional response criterion.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The discretion is ad hoc rather than governed by a consistent proportional rule.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve ad-hoc-discretion-to-selected-outcome direction.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The ad hoc discretion produces the selected listed outcome.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires inconsistency between case responses or burdens.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The outcome is case-to-case inconsistency.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a systematic bias toward or within escalation decisions.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The outcome is escalation bias.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires preferential treatment of selected cases or actors.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The outcome is favoritism.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires burdens whose case-level incidence or magnitude is unpredictable.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The outcome is unpredictable burden.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Ad hoc response discretion produces one listed case-burden outcome.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "ad hoc response discretion causes a listed burden distortion", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P090-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Due process can coexist with discretionary proportional judgments and need not exhibit inconsistency.", "slug": "procedural_fairness_due_process"}], "residual_id": "r:proportional_response_design:b051_a11_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b051_a11_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Ad hoc discretion produces case-to-case inconsistency, escalation bias, favoritism, or unpredictable burden. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Ad hoc discretion produces case-to-case inconsistency, escalation bias, favoritism, or unpredictable burden."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Due process can coexist with discretionary proportional judgments and need not exhibit inconsistency.", "slug": "procedural_fairness_due_process"}], "normalized_requirement": "Ad hoc discretion creates inconsistent or biased response burdens.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Ad hoc discretion creates inconsistent or biased response burdens.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An intrinsic ceiling requires saturation and therefore departs from proportionality near the ceiling.", "slug": "intrinsic_ceiling_vs_input"}], "residual_id": "r:proportional_response_design:b051_a11_c5", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b051_a11_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The input-output relation is expected to remain mostly proportional within the relevant operating range. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The input-output relation is expected to remain mostly proportional within the relevant operating range."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An intrinsic ceiling requires saturation and therefore departs from proportionality near the ceiling.", "slug": "intrinsic_ceiling_vs_input"}], "normalized_requirement": "The input-output relation should remain approximately proportional across the operating range.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The input-output relation should remain approximately proportional across the operating range.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The system needs a stable rule that operators, affected parties, or downstream systems can understand and anticipate.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: The system needs a stable rule that operators, affected parties, or downstream systems can understand and anticipate. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The system needs a stable rule that operators, affected parties, or downstream systems can understand and anticipate."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The system needs a stable rule that operators, affected parties, or downstream systems can understand and anticipate."}, {"display_text": "The response can be bounded by minimum guarantees, maximum caps, rights constraints, safety limits, or exception review.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Do not use it when a baseline obligation, dignity standard, safety rule, or rights constraint requires the same minimum treatment regardless of magnitude. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: The response can be bounded by minimum guarantees, maximum caps, rights constraints, safety limits, or exception review. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The response can be bounded by minimum guarantees, maximum caps, rights constraints, safety limits, or exception review.", "Do not use it when a baseline obligation, dignity standard, safety rule, or rights constraint requires the same minimum treatment regardless of magnitude."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The response can be bounded by minimum guarantees, maximum caps, rights constraints, safety limits, or exception review."}, {"display_text": "Measurement is good enough to support calibration, or uncertainty can be represented explicitly.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: Measurement is good enough to support calibration, or uncertainty can be represented explicitly. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Measurement is good enough to support calibration, or uncertainty can be represented explicitly."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "Measurement is good enough to support calibration, or uncertainty can be represented explicitly."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 51, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-051", "ledger_sha256": "58ae6ddf311482c0c1ea14c7ce009ce97dab242b0bd542d2aa55e0824e7b616b"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Proportionality Calibration", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:proportionality_calibration", "slug": "proportionality_calibration"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a mismatch between case conditions and response strength. In one direction, the system overreacts: a minor or uncertain case receives a severe restriction, public sanction, shutdown, or exclusion. In the other direction, the system underreacts: a serious, recurring, or high-exposure problem receives a symbolic warning, delayed process, or inadequate repair.\n\nThe mismatch often arises because response tools are easier to name than response criteria. A policy may contain sanctions, a workflow may contain escalation steps, or a dashboard may contain risk categories, yet no one has defined how severity, necessity, burden, affected interests, and context should be weighed. The result is either automatic punishment, improvisational discretion, or a table that looks objective while hiding the real judgment.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A governance or decision system applies responses that are too severe, too weak, too automatic, too symbolic, or poorly matched to the harm, risk, need, or context of the case."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A calibrated response can vary systematically and nonarbitrarily.", "slug": "calibration"}], "residual_id": "r:proportionality_calibration:b051_a12_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b051_a12_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The structural problem is a mismatch between case conditions and response strength. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Response strength varies arbitrarily.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Response strength varies arbitrarily", "The structural problem is a mismatch between case conditions and response strength."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A calibrated response can vary systematically and nonarbitrarily.", "slug": "calibration"}], "normalized_requirement": "Response strength varies arbitrarily.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Response strength varies arbitrarily.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A strong response can be necessary, narrowly tailored, and carry no avoidable collateral burden.", "slug": "proportionality"}], "residual_id": "r:proportionality_calibration:b051_a12_c2", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b051_a12_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A strong intervention creates collateral burden. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A strong intervention creates collateral burden"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A strong response can be necessary, narrowly tailored, and carry no avoidable collateral burden.", "slug": "proportionality"}], "normalized_requirement": "A strong intervention creates collateral burden.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A strong intervention creates collateral burden.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A calibrated rule can remain accurate and sufficiently strong as the world moves.", "slug": "calibrated_rule_vs_moving_world"}], "residual_id": "r:proportionality_calibration:b051_a12_c3", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b051_a12_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A governance or decision system applies responses that are too severe, too weak, too automatic, too symbolic, or poorly matched to the harm, risk, need, or context of the case. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A weak response fails to address real severity.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A weak response fails to address real severity", "A governance or decision system applies responses that are too severe, too weak, too automatic, too symbolic, or poorly matched to the harm, risk, need, or context of the case."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A calibrated rule can remain accurate and sufficiently strong as the world moves.", "slug": "calibrated_rule_vs_moving_world"}], "normalized_requirement": "A weak response fails to address real severity.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A weak response fails to address real severity.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A proportionality analysis can use a precise context-sensitive rule with no discretionary risk.", "slug": "proportionality"}], "residual_id": "r:proportionality_calibration:b051_a12_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b051_a12_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Context matters but discretion is risky. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Context matters but discretion is risky"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A proportionality analysis can use a precise context-sensitive rule with no discretionary risk.", "slug": "proportionality"}], "normalized_requirement": "Context matters but discretion is risky.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Context matters but discretion is risky.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Decision-makers face pressure to overreact.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Decision-makers face pressure to overreact. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Decision-makers face pressure to overreact"]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Decision-makers face pressure to overreact"}, {"display_text": "Decision-makers face pressure to underreact.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Decision-makers face pressure to underreact. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Decision-makers face pressure to underreact"]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Decision-makers face pressure to underreact"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 51, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-051", "ledger_sha256": "58ae6ddf311482c0c1ea14c7ce009ce97dab242b0bd542d2aa55e0824e7b616b"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Propositional Mode Governance", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:propositional_mode_governance", "slug": "propositional_mode_governance"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system contains propositions whose epistemic modes are implicit, unstable, inconsistently communicated, or collapsed into generic claim text, causing actors to rely on, test, prove, challenge, or communicate them under the wrong operating rules.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system contains propositions whose epistemic modes are implicit, unstable, inconsistently communicated, or collapsed into generic claim text, causing actors to rely on, test, prove, challenge, or communicate them under the wrong operating rules."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "One proposition has one mode at a time; the prime does not require a mixed artifact.", "slug": "epistemic_mode_of_a_proposition"}], "residual_id": "r:propositional_mode_governance:b051_a13_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b051_a13_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Examples include strategy decks, research memos, mathematical proofs, model cards, risk registers, policies, and requirements documents. In this condition set, the requirement is: Claims, assumptions, hypotheses, premises, axioms, estimates, and beliefs appear together in one artifact.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Claims, assumptions, hypotheses, premises, axioms, estimates, and beliefs appear together in one artifact."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "One proposition has one mode at a time; the prime does not require a mixed artifact.", "slug": "epistemic_mode_of_a_proposition"}], "normalized_requirement": "Claims, assumptions, hypotheses, premises, axioms, estimates, and beliefs appear together in one artifact.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Claims, assumptions, hypotheses, premises, axioms, estimates, and beliefs appear together in one artifact.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A proposition can be a proven theorem or accepted fact before use.", "slug": "epistemic_mode_of_a_proposition"}], "residual_id": "r:propositional_mode_governance:b051_a13_c2", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b051_a13_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The system must know whether it is using the proposition as an assumption, a working hypothesis, a decision premise, or a provisional belief. In this condition set, the requirement is: A proposition must be used before it is fully warranted.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A proposition needs to be used before it is fully warranted."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A proposition can be a proven theorem or accepted fact before use.", "slug": "epistemic_mode_of_a_proposition"}], "normalized_requirement": "A proposition must be used before it is fully warranted.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A proposition must be used before it is fully warranted.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An axiom's mode can be explicitly local, but many modal propositions are challengeable or accepted identically across systems.", "slug": "epistemic_mode_of_a_proposition"}], "residual_id": "r:propositional_mode_governance:b051_a13_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b051_a13_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Axioms, model primitives, policy values, definitions, standards, and institutional premises often have this inside/outside structure. In this condition set, the requirement is: A proposition is accepted within one system but challengeable outside it.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A proposition is accepted inside one system but challengeable from outside it."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An axiom's mode can be explicitly local, but many modal propositions are challengeable or accepted identically across systems.", "slug": "epistemic_mode_of_a_proposition"}], "normalized_requirement": "A proposition is accepted within one system but challengeable outside it.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A proposition is accepted within one system but challengeable outside it.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A proposition's epistemic mode need not be temporary or support a dependent conclusion.", "slug": "epistemic_mode_of_a_proposition"}], "residual_id": "r:propositional_mode_governance:b051_a13_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b051_a13_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The dependency must remain visible so the conclusion is not reported as unconditional. In this condition set, the requirement is: A conclusion depends on temporary premises, scope conditions, or unresolved tests.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A conclusion depends on temporary premises, scope conditions, or unresolved tests."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A proposition's epistemic mode need not be temporary or support a dependent conclusion.", "slug": "epistemic_mode_of_a_proposition"}], "normalized_requirement": "A conclusion depends on temporary premises, scope conditions, or unresolved tests.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A conclusion depends on temporary premises, scope conditions, or unresolved tests.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Different modes imply different obligations.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Hypotheses require tests; assumptions require monitoring; premises require discharge or scope; asserted facts require warrant; axioms require boundary declaration. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: Different modes imply different obligations. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Different modes imply different obligations.", "Hypotheses require tests; assumptions require monitoring; premises require discharge or scope; asserted facts require warrant; axioms require boundary declaration."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Different modes imply different obligations."}, {"display_text": "Teams or tools move propositions across documents, models, databases, or decisions.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Mode labels and transition history must travel with the proposition, not remain in the original author’s head. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: Teams or tools move propositions across documents, models, databases, or decisions. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Teams or tools move propositions across documents, models, databases, or decisions.", "Mode labels and transition history must travel with the proposition, not remain in the original author’s head."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Teams or tools move propositions across documents, models, databases, or decisions."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 51, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-051", "ledger_sha256": "58ae6ddf311482c0c1ea14c7ce009ce97dab242b0bd542d2aa55e0824e7b616b"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Prototype-Centered Category Modeling", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:prototype_centered_category_modeling", "slug": "prototype_centered_category_modeling"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A category is needed for recognition, routing, teaching, retrieval, governance, or explanation, but the phenomenon does not obey a clean necessary-and-sufficient boundary. Crisp criteria overfit some cases, underfit others, hide central examples, flatten internal variation, or force marginal cases into decisions that should instead be graded, reviewed, split, or revised.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A category is needed for recognition, routing, teaching, retrieval, governance, or explanation, but the phenomenon does not obey a clean necessary-and-sufficient boundary. Crisp criteria overfit some cases, underfit others, hide central examples, flatten internal variation, or force marginal cases into decisions that should instead be graded, reviewed, split, or revised."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record organizes a category around a graded central prototype, with decreasing typicality and ambiguous boundaries.", "role_mapping": "Central cases -> prototype-near members; edge disputes -> graded periphery.", "slug": "prototype_theory", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b051_a14_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Central cases are easy to recognize, but edge cases produce recurring disputes. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Central cases are easy to recognize, but edge cases produce recurring disputes."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Prototype Theory", "one_liner": "Categories are organized around their best examples rather than by necessary-and-sufficient definitions, modeling kinds as centers with gradients rather than boxes with edges.", "page_ref": "prime:prototype_theory", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Central cases -> prototype-near members; edge disputes -> graded periphery.", "slug": "prototype_theory", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record organizes a category around a graded central prototype, with decreasing typicality and ambiguous boundaries."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Central cases are readily recognized while edge cases produce recurring disputes.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Prototype-based classification can be explicit, published, and aligned with its examples.", "slug": "prototype_theory"}], "residual_id": "r:prototype_centered_category_modeling:b051_a14_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b051_a14_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Users, reviewers, learners, or models classify by implicit examples rather than by the published definition. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Users, reviewers, learners, or models classify by implicit examples rather than by the published definition."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Prototype-based classification can be explicit, published, and aligned with its examples.", "slug": "prototype_theory"}], "normalized_requirement": "Classifiers use implicit examples rather than the published definition.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Classifiers use implicit examples rather than the published definition.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires graded membership by similarity to central exemplars rather than one necessary-and-sufficient essence.", "role_mapping": "Family resemblance -> overlapping features; center -> prototype.", "slug": "prototype_theory", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b051_a14_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A category has family-resemblance structure, multiple valid centers, or context-dependent features. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A category has family-resemblance structure, multiple valid centers, or context-dependent features."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Prototype Theory", "one_liner": "Categories are organized around their best examples rather than by necessary-and-sufficient definitions, modeling kinds as centers with gradients rather than boxes with edges.", "page_ref": "prime:prototype_theory", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Family resemblance -> overlapping features; center -> prototype.", "slug": "prototype_theory", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires graded membership by similarity to central exemplars rather than one necessary-and-sufficient essence."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A category has family resemblance, multiple centers, or context-dependent features.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A prototype category can be modeled without any prior rigid rule or unfair result.", "slug": "prototype_theory"}], "residual_id": "r:prototype_centered_category_modeling:b051_a14_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b051_a14_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Rigid membership rules produce absurd, unfair, or misleading results for peripheral cases. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Rigid membership rules produce absurd, unfair, or misleading results for peripheral cases."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A prototype category can be modeled without any prior rigid rule or unfair result.", "slug": "prototype_theory"}], "normalized_requirement": "Rigid membership rules produce absurd, unfair, or misleading peripheral results.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Rigid membership rules produce absurd, unfair, or misleading peripheral results.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Graded similarity to a prototype permits new cases to share central features without satisfying a crisp boundary.", "role_mapping": "Novel case -> candidate member; partial resemblance -> graded typicality.", "slug": "prototype_theory", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b051_a14_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: New cases are arriving that resemble the category center in some ways but challenge old boundaries. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["New cases are arriving that resemble the category center in some ways but challenge old boundaries."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Prototype Theory", "one_liner": "Categories are organized around their best examples rather than by necessary-and-sufficient definitions, modeling kinds as centers with gradients rather than boxes with edges.", "page_ref": "prime:prototype_theory", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Novel case -> candidate member; partial resemblance -> graded typicality.", "slug": "prototype_theory", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Graded similarity to a prototype permits new cases to share central features without satisfying a crisp boundary."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Novel cases resemble the category center in some respects while challenging old boundaries.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A training, tagging, triage, rubric, diagnostic, or taxonomy process needs examples to calibrate judgment.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: A training, tagging, triage, rubric, diagnostic, or taxonomy process needs examples to calibrate judgment. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A training, tagging, triage, rubric, diagnostic, or taxonomy process needs examples to calibrate judgment."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "A training, tagging, triage, rubric, diagnostic, or taxonomy process needs examples to calibrate judgment."}, {"display_text": "Stakeholders appear to disagree about a term because they are using different hidden prototypes.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Stakeholders appear to disagree about a term because they are using different hidden prototypes. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders appear to disagree about a term because they are using different hidden prototypes."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Stakeholders appear to disagree about a term because they are using different hidden prototypes."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 51, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-051", "ledger_sha256": "58ae6ddf311482c0c1ea14c7ce009ce97dab242b0bd542d2aa55e0824e7b616b"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Proxy Mediation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:proxy_mediation", "slug": "proxy_mediation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a costly direct edge. A principal and counterparty could interact directly, but the edge is too exposing, too noisy, too dependent, too trust-heavy, or too demanding. The principal may be a service, person, organization, resource owner, patient, client, team, or institution. The counterparty may be a caller, client, requester, adversarial environment, market, bureaucracy, or public audience.\n\nWithout a proxy, the principal is forced either to open itself directly or to refuse interaction. Direct openness creates leakage, overload, capture, inappropriate dependency, and repeated negotiation. Total closure blocks useful exchange. Proxy mediation creates a controlled substitute relation: the counterparty interacts with a representative, while the principal remains shielded or selectively reachable.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A direct relationship between a principal and counterparty is costly, unsafe, too complex, too revealing, too dependency-producing, or too burdensome, and at least one side can be represented by an intermediary without destroying the value of the interaction."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P090-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O9"], ["O1", "O2", "O10"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve direct interaction between the focal principal and counterparty.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A principal and counterparty would interact directly.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve disclosure as a consequence of direct contact and the information's sensitivity.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The direct interaction would reveal sensitive information about the principal.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires identity disclosure.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The sensitive attribute is identity.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires location disclosure.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The sensitive attribute is location.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires disclosure of internal structure.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The sensitive attribute is internal structure.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires disclosure of sensitive state.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The sensitive attribute is internal state.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires capacity disclosure.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The sensitive attribute is capacity.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires preference disclosure.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The sensitive attribute is preferences.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires credential disclosure.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "The sensitive attribute is credentials.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires disclosure of strategic intent.", "obligation_id": "O10", "statement": "The sensitive attribute is strategic intent.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Direct contact would reveal one listed sensitive attribute of a principal.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "direct relationship exposes sensitive principal information", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P090-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A faithful proxy can stand in for a nonsensitive target and need not protect disclosure.", "slug": "proxy_target_fidelity"}], "residual_id": "r:proxy_mediation:b051_a15_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b051_a15_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Direct contact would reveal identity, location, internal structure, sensitive state, capacity, preferences, credentials, or strategic intent. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Direct contact would reveal identity, location, internal structure, sensitive state, capacity, preferences, credentials, or strategic intent."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A faithful proxy can stand in for a nonsensitive target and need not protect disclosure.", "slug": "proxy_target_fidelity"}], "normalized_requirement": "Direct contact would reveal sensitive identity, state, capacity, credentials, structure, or intent.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Direct contact would reveal sensitive identity, state, capacity, credentials, structure, or intent.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P091-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O9"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the principal and the focal direct interaction.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A principal would need to interact directly with a counterparty or process.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail capability insufficiency for direct interaction, not a mere preference for mediation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The principal lacks enough of the selected capability to interact directly.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires insufficient time for direct interaction.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The missing capability is time.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires insufficient expertise for direct interaction.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The missing capability is expertise.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires lack of required physical or operational presence.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The missing capability is presence.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires insufficient standing to interact directly.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The missing capability is standing.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a language barrier to direct interaction.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The missing capability is language compatibility.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires protocol incompatibility in direct interaction.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The missing capability is protocol compatibility.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires insufficient procedural capacity for direct interaction.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "The missing capability is procedural capacity.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A principal lacks one listed capability required for direct interaction.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "principal lacks a required direct-interaction capability", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P091-C01-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Mediator scarcity limits guidance but does not entail principal incapacity across the listed interaction roles.", "slug": "mediator_availability_constraint"}], "residual_id": "r:proxy_mediation:b051_a15_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b051_a15_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The principal lacks time, expertise, presence, standing, language, protocol compatibility, or procedural capacity to interact directly. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The principal lacks time, expertise, presence, standing, language, protocol compatibility, or procedural capacity to interact directly."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Mediator scarcity limits guidance but does not entail principal incapacity across the listed interaction roles.", "slug": "mediator_availability_constraint"}], "normalized_requirement": "The principal lacks capacity, expertise, presence, standing, language, or protocol compatibility for direct interaction.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The principal lacks capacity, expertise, presence, standing, language, or protocol compatibility for direct interaction.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A faithful measurement proxy need not mediate an interactive counterparty or hide implementation.", "slug": "proxy_target_fidelity"}], "residual_id": "r:proxy_mediation:b051_a15_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b051_a15_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The counterparty needs a stable point of interaction, but the principal’s internal implementation, availability, or decision process should remain hidden. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The counterparty needs a stable point of interaction, but the principal’s internal implementation, availability, or decision process should remain hidden."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A faithful measurement proxy need not mediate an interactive counterparty or hide implementation.", "slug": "proxy_target_fidelity"}], "normalized_requirement": "The counterparty needs a stable interface while principal internals or availability remain hidden.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The counterparty needs a stable interface while principal internals or availability remain hidden.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P091-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve two counterparties and a direct release between them.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "One party would directly release an object to a counterparty.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve trust-risk-to-unsafe-exchange direction.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Trust risk concerning the counterparty makes that direct release unsafe.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires unsafe direct release of value.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The directly released object is value.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires unsafe direct release of information.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The directly released object is information.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires unsafe direct grant of access.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The directly released object is access.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires unsafe direct exchange of a commitment.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The directly released object is a commitment.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Counterparty trust risk makes direct release of one listed object unsafe.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "trust risk makes direct exchange unsafe", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P091-C02-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Risk transfer reallocates loss but need not insert an interaction intermediary.", "slug": "risk_transfer"}], "residual_id": "r:proxy_mediation:b051_a15_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b051_a15_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Trust risk makes direct exchange unsafe because one party should not release value, information, access, or commitments directly. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Trust risk makes direct exchange unsafe because one party should not release value, information, access, or commitments directly."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "I attempted to preserve hold_up_problem plus the single qualifier while falsifying a complete DNF branch; the exact structural commitments and mapped roles left no such complete counterexample.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Hold-up Problem", "one_liner": "Explain why parties who would both gain from a relationship-specific asset fail to build it: once the investment is sunk the counterparty can renegotiate against the exposed investor, and it is the anticipation of that squeeze — not the squeeze itself — that quietly distorts investment beforehand.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:hold_up_problem", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1", "O6"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "relationship_specific_investment_is_direct_commitment", "predicate": "The relationship-specific investment is a commitment released directly to the counterparty.", "rationale": "Independent exact-record review preserves all native roles, comparison direction, DNF branch semantics, and universal force; any retained qualifier is one atomic candidate-anchored restriction and does not substitute a solution operation."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "hold_up_problem"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "relationship_specific_investment_is_direct_commitment"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "hold_up_problem", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P091-C02-U1", "why_it_fits": "The hold-up spine directly supplies counterparty risk that distorts commitment; one contextual binding specifies that the investment is released directly as a commitment to the partner."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Trust risk makes direct exchange of value, information, access, or commitment unsafe.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record inserts an intermediate reference or layer so consumers depend on it rather than on a concrete endpoint, enabling substitution and change.", "role_mapping": "Principal/counterparty -> endpoints; proxy -> indirection layer; substitution difficulty -> direct coupling.", "slug": "indirection", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b051_a15_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Direct openness creates leakage, overload, capture, inappropriate dependency, and repeated negotiation. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Direct dependency would make later substitution, scaling, privacy, or governance difficult.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Direct dependency would make later substitution, scaling, privacy, or governance difficult.", "Direct openness creates leakage, overload, capture, inappropriate dependency, and repeated negotiation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Indirection", "one_liner": "Introduces intermediary references.", "page_ref": "prime:indirection", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Principal/counterparty -> endpoints; proxy -> indirection layer; substitution difficulty -> direct coupling.", "slug": "indirection", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record inserts an intermediate reference or layer so consumers depend on it rather than on a concrete endpoint, enabling substitution and change."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Direct dependency would make later substitution, scaling, privacy, or governance difficult.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The principal needs representation but also needs authority limits, consent rules, traceability, and revocation.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The archetype is especially useful when a principal can define what the proxy may do and when counterparties can reasonably rely on the proxy’s authority. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: The principal needs representation but also needs authority limits, consent rules, traceability, and revocation. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The principal needs representation but also needs authority limits, consent rules, traceability, and revocation.", "The archetype is especially useful when a principal can define what the proxy may do and when counterparties can reasonably rely on the proxy’s authority."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The principal needs representation but also needs authority limits, consent rules, traceability, and revocation."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 51, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-051", "ledger_sha256": "58ae6ddf311482c0c1ea14c7ce009ce97dab242b0bd542d2aa55e0824e7b616b"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Proxy–Target Divergence Detection and Recalibration", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:proxy_target_divergence_detection_and_recalibration", "slug": "proxy_target_divergence_detection_and_recalibration"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system continues to use a proxy as if it still represented the target, even though the proxy-target relationship has changed. The proxy may remain precise, visible, cheap, and institutionally embedded while the target becomes invisible, moves to a different regime, or is strategically bypassed. Because the proxy was once useful, its failure is often interpreted as noise, noncompliance, or exceptional cases rather than as evidence that the proxy no longer means what the system thinks it means.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system continues to use a proxy as if it still represented the target, even though the proxy-target relationship has changed. The proxy may remain precise, visible, cheap, and institutionally embedded while the target becomes invisible, moves to a different regime, or is strategically bypassed. Because the proxy was once useful, its failure is often interpreted as noise, noncompliance, or exceptional cases rather than as evidence that the proxy no longer means what the system thinks it means."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires a target governed through an observable proxy whose relation to the target can diverge.", "role_mapping": "Target -> latent objective; score -> proxy.", "slug": "proxy_target_divergence", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b052_a01_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A hard-to-observe target is governed through an easier-to-observe proxy, score, indicator, benchmark, cue, or reference standard. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A hard-to-observe target is governed through an easier-to-observe proxy, score, indicator, benchmark, cue, or reference standard."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Proxy-Target Divergence", "one_liner": "An apparatus calibrated against a proxy keeps operating on it after the proxy-target relationship has silently decoupled.", "page_ref": "prime:proxy_target_divergence", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Target -> latent objective; score -> proxy.", "slug": "proxy_target_divergence", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires a target governed through an observable proxy whose relation to the target can diverge."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A hard-to-observe target is governed through an easier proxy or benchmark.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires a proxy-target mapping that once held but has changed under drift, incentives, or intervention.", "role_mapping": "Prior validity -> former coupling; change -> divergence.", "slug": "proxy_target_divergence", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b052_a01_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The proxy-target relationship was validated in a prior context but may not have been refreshed after changes in population, behavior, technology, policy, reference standard, or incentive structure. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The proxy-target relationship was validated in a prior context but may not have been refreshed after changes in population, behavior, technology, policy, reference standard, or incentive structure."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Proxy-Target Divergence", "one_liner": "An apparatus calibrated against a proxy keeps operating on it after the proxy-target relationship has silently decoupled.", "page_ref": "prime:proxy_target_divergence", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Prior validity -> former coupling; change -> divergence.", "slug": "proxy_target_divergence", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires a proxy-target mapping that once held but has changed under drift, incentives, or intervention."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A previously validated proxy-target relation may be stale after contextual change.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Proxy divergence can arise from exogenous population or technology change without strategic gaming.", "slug": "proxy_target_divergence"}], "residual_id": "r:proxy_target_divergence_detection_and_recalibration:b052_a01_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b052_a01_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Actors can learn, game, optimize, comply superficially with, or route around the proxy. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Actors can learn, game, optimize, comply superficially with, or route around the proxy."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Proxy divergence can arise from exogenous population or technology change without strategic gaming.", "slug": "proxy_target_divergence"}], "normalized_requirement": "Actors can game, optimize, comply superficially with, or route around the proxy.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Actors can game, optimize, comply superficially with, or route around the proxy.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The defining record requires proxy movement to cease tracking target movement.", "role_mapping": "Proxy improvement -> indicator change; absent target improvement -> broken relation.", "slug": "proxy_target_divergence", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b052_a01_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Observed proxy improvement is no longer accompanied by independent evidence of target improvement. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Observed proxy improvement is no longer accompanied by independent evidence of target improvement."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Proxy-Target Divergence", "one_liner": "An apparatus calibrated against a proxy keeps operating on it after the proxy-target relationship has silently decoupled.", "page_ref": "prime:proxy_target_divergence", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Proxy improvement -> indicator change; absent target improvement -> broken relation.", "slug": "proxy_target_divergence", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The defining record requires proxy movement to cease tracking target movement."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Proxy improvement lacks independent evidence of target improvement.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A proxy can diverge within its original scope because behavior or causal structure changed.", "slug": "proxy_target_divergence"}], "residual_id": "r:proxy_target_divergence_detection_and_recalibration:b052_a01_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b052_a01_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A metric is being used at higher stakes, broader scope, or longer duration than the original validity evidence supported. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A metric is being used at higher stakes, broader scope, or longer duration than the original validity evidence supported."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A proxy can diverge within its original scope because behavior or causal structure changed.", "slug": "proxy_target_divergence"}], "normalized_requirement": "The metric is used beyond the stakes, scope, or duration of its validity evidence.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The metric is used beyond the stakes, scope, or duration of its validity evidence.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The proxy has been operationalized into decisions, rewards, rankings, automation, certification, compliance, diagnosis, funding, or optimization.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The system needs stable measures to act, yet the act of measuring, rewarding, optimizing, and routinizing a proxy can destroy the relation that made it useful. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The proxy has been operationalized into decisions, rewards, rankings, automation, certification, compliance, diagnosis, funding, or optimization. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The proxy has been operationalized into decisions, rewards, rankings, automation, certification, compliance, diagnosis, funding, or optimization.", "The system needs stable measures to act, yet the act of measuring, rewarding, optimizing, and routinizing a proxy can destroy the relation that made it useful."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "The proxy has been operationalized into decisions, rewards, rankings, automation, certification, compliance, diagnosis, funding, or optimization."}, {"display_text": "The costs of direct target measurement are high enough that the organization is tempted to trust the proxy indefinitely.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system continues to use a proxy as if it still represented the target, even though the proxy-target relationship has changed. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The costs of direct target measurement are high enough that the organization is tempted to trust the proxy indefinitely. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The costs of direct target measurement are high enough that the organization is tempted to trust the proxy indefinitely.", "A system continues to use a proxy as if it still represented the target, even though the proxy-target relationship has changed."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "The costs of direct target measurement are high enough that the organization is tempted to trust the proxy indefinitely."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 52, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-052", "ledger_sha256": "cfa1322919e546c5fa235e4adef471dd958694c4849ba49de0d758ec7887aab2"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Psychological Safety Enablement", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:psychological_safety_enablement", "slug": "psychological_safety_enablement"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is not merely that people lack a communication tool. The problem is that disclosure has a perceived penalty. A person may know that a decision is risky, a procedure is confusing, a mistake occurred, or an assumption is false, but the social environment makes silence rational.\n\nThat penalty can be formal or informal. Formal penalties include poor evaluations, assignment loss, disciplinary consequences, or career damage. Informal penalties include ridicule, exclusion, reputation loss, being labeled difficult, or disappointing a respected authority figure. The intervention has to address both kinds, because informal punishment can continue even when official policy says people are protected.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system needs errors, concerns, dissent, questions, weak signals, or uncertainty to surface, but the people who hold those signals expect punishment, embarrassment, retaliation, or status loss if they speak."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A psychologically safe group can have a quiet meeting because members genuinely agree.", "slug": "psychological_safety"}], "residual_id": "r:psychological_safety_enablement:b052_a02_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b052_a02_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Silent meetings or rapid false consensus. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Silent meetings or rapid false consensus"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A psychologically safe group can have a quiet meeting because members genuinely agree.", "slug": "psychological_safety"}], "normalized_requirement": "Meetings are silent or reach rapid false consensus.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Meetings are silent or reach rapid false consensus.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P091-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve reportable safety-relevant signals and their potential reporters.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "People possess or encounter safety-relevant signals that can be reported into a system.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail underreporting, not merely a small absolute number of events.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Reporting is lower than the occurrence or knowledge of those signals warrants.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires underreporting of near misses.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The underreported signals are near misses.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires underreporting of defects.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The underreported signals are defects.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires underreporting of hazards.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The underreported signals are hazards.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires underreporting of ethical concerns.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The underreported signals are ethical concerns.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "One listed class of safety-relevant concern is underreported.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "safety-relevant concerns are underreported", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P091-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A no-failure anchor can come from insensitive testing rather than suppressed reports.", "slug": "empirical_no_failure_anchor"}], "residual_id": "r:psychological_safety_enablement:b052_a02_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b052_a02_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Low reporting of near misses, defects, hazards, or ethical concerns. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Low reporting of near misses, defects, hazards, or ethical concerns"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A no-failure anchor can come from insensitive testing rather than suppressed reports.", "slug": "empirical_no_failure_anchor"}], "normalized_requirement": "Near misses, defects, hazards, or ethical concerns are underreported.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Near misses, defects, hazards, or ethical concerns are underreported.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Psychological safety is the absence of expected interpersonal punishment and need not include a defensive powerful actor.", "slug": "psychological_safety"}], "residual_id": "r:psychological_safety_enablement:b052_a02_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b052_a02_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: High-status or powerful actors react defensively to questions. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["High-status or powerful actors react defensively to questions"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Psychological safety is the absence of expected interpersonal punishment and need not include a defensive powerful actor.", "slug": "psychological_safety"}], "normalized_requirement": "Powerful actors respond defensively to questions.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Powerful actors respond defensively to questions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P091-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a group, its assumptions, and participant challenge acts.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A group operates with assumptions that members can question or challenge.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve low challenge frequency rather than a single episode of silence.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Members of the selected participant class challenge those assumptions only rarely.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires newcomers to challenge assumptions rarely.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The low-challenge participants are newcomers.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires junior-role participants to challenge assumptions rarely.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The low-challenge participants occupy junior roles.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires marginalized participants to challenge assumptions rarely.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The low-challenge participants belong to marginalized groups.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Members of one listed participant class rarely challenge assumptions.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "members of a listed participant class rarely challenge assumptions", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P091-C04-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A safe climate can include frequent challenge from junior members.", "slug": "psychological_safety"}], "residual_id": "r:psychological_safety_enablement:b052_a02_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b052_a02_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Newcomers, junior roles, or marginalized groups rarely challenge assumptions. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Newcomers, junior roles, or marginalized groups rarely challenge assumptions"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A safe climate can include frequent challenge from junior members.", "slug": "psychological_safety"}], "normalized_requirement": "Newcomers, junior roles, or marginalized groups rarely challenge assumptions.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Newcomers, junior roles, or marginalized groups rarely challenge assumptions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Repeated surprises or preventable failures.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Common triggers include low near-miss reporting, repeated surprises, silent meetings, overly smooth consensus, “we all knew but nobody said it” failures, and teams that only surface concerns after the cost of silence becomes visible. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Repeated surprises or preventable failures. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Repeated surprises or preventable failures", "Common triggers include low near-miss reporting, repeated surprises, silent meetings, overly smooth consensus, “we all knew but nobody said it” failures, and teams that only surface concerns after the cost of silence becomes visible."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "Repeated surprises or preventable failures"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 52, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-052", "ledger_sha256": "cfa1322919e546c5fa235e4adef471dd958694c4849ba49de0d758ec7887aab2"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Public Goods Provision", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:public_goods_provision", "slug": "public_goods_provision"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a gap between collective value and individual incentive. The group would benefit if the good existed at a sufficient level, but any one actor's reason to contribute is weakened because others also benefit. This creates chronic underfunding, delayed maintenance, incomplete coverage, or reliance on hidden labor.\n\nThe problem often appears in four forms. First, no one funds creation because benefits are too diffuse. Second, a good is launched but not maintained. Third, a few contributors carry a disproportionate burden. Fourth, access or quality becomes unstable because the provision system never had a legitimate contribution base.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A valuable good, service, infrastructure, knowledge base, standard, safety capacity, or shared benefit is underprovided because people can benefit from it even when they do not contribute to its creation or maintenance."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires non-excludability from the good's benefit.", "role_mapping": "Good -> shared benefit; access -> non-exclusion.", "slug": "public_goods", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b052_a03_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The good is non-excludable, difficult to exclude, or politically or ethically undesirable to exclude from. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The good is non-excludable, difficult to exclude, or politically or ethically undesirable to exclude from."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Public Goods", "one_liner": "Non-excludable goods.", "page_ref": "prime:public_goods", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Good -> shared benefit; access -> non-exclusion.", "slug": "public_goods", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires non-excludability from the good's benefit."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The good is non-excludable or exclusion is impractical or undesirable.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires non-rival consumption alongside non-excludability.", "role_mapping": "Use -> consumption; shared benefit -> non-rival good.", "slug": "public_goods", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b052_a03_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Use by one beneficiary does not substantially reduce the immediate benefit to others, or the shared benefit diffuses widely. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Use by one beneficiary does not substantially reduce the immediate benefit to others, or the shared benefit diffuses widely."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Public Goods", "one_liner": "Non-excludable goods.", "page_ref": "prime:public_goods", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Use -> consumption; shared benefit -> non-rival good.", "slug": "public_goods", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires non-rival consumption alongside non-excludability."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "One beneficiary's use does not materially subtract from others or the benefit diffuses widely.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires receiving a collective benefit without contributing a fair share.", "role_mapping": "Waiting beneficiary -> noncontributor; others' payment -> contributed provision.", "slug": "free_riding", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b052_a03_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Potential contributors wait for others to pay, maintain, organize, or take responsibility. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Potential contributors wait for others to pay, maintain, organize, or take responsibility."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Free Riding", "one_liner": "The systematic under-provision that results when individuals can enjoy a non-excludable shared good without contributing proportionately to producing it.", "page_ref": "prime:free_riding", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Waiting beneficiary -> noncontributor; others' payment -> contributed provision.", "slug": "free_riding", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires receiving a collective benefit without contributing a fair share."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Potential contributors wait for others to fund, maintain, or organize the good.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A wealthy beneficiary can voluntarily fund an entire public good.", "slug": "public_goods"}], "residual_id": "r:public_goods_provision:b052_a03_c4", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b052_a03_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The good has creation costs, fixed costs, maintenance costs, coordination costs, or renewal costs that no single beneficiary wants to bear alone. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The good has creation costs, fixed costs, maintenance costs, coordination costs, or renewal costs that no single beneficiary wants to bear alone."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A wealthy beneficiary can voluntarily fund an entire public good.", "slug": "public_goods"}], "normalized_requirement": "Creation and maintenance costs are not willingly borne by any one beneficiary.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Creation and maintenance costs are not willingly borne by any one beneficiary.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Legitimate authority, coordination, or contribution governance can be created without destroying the public value of the good.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The collective value of the good is larger than the value any one actor can privately capture, so individually rational non-contribution prevents or weakens a collectively valuable resource. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: Legitimate authority, coordination, or contribution governance can be created without destroying the public value of the good. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Legitimate authority, coordination, or contribution governance can be created without destroying the public value of the good.", "The collective value of the good is larger than the value any one actor can privately capture, so individually rational non-contribution prevents or weakens a collectively valuable resource."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Legitimate authority, coordination, or contribution governance can be created without destroying the public value of the good."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 52, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-052", "ledger_sha256": "cfa1322919e546c5fa235e4adef471dd958694c4849ba49de0d758ec7887aab2"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Pulse Release", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:pulse_release", "slug": "pulse_release"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 3 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a mismatch between sender flow and receiver absorption. One side can produce, push, fund, announce, train, or stimulate continuously. The other side can only process, act, recover, or respond in episodes. When those two structures are misaligned, more input can produce less uptake.\n\nSymptoms include message blindness, backlog, response decay, attention fatigue, repeated clarification requests, adoption stalls, and confusing outcome data. The sender may think the problem is insufficient volume, while the receiver is actually saturated. Adding more pressure makes the system noisier rather than more effective.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A sender, producer, funder, trainer, coordinator, or support system emits input continuously or too diffusely, while the receiving system can only attend to, absorb, process, or respond in bounded episodes."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Habituation requires repeated signaling but not necessarily continuous input or an episodic alternative.", "slug": "habituation_to_repeated_signal"}], "residual_id": "r:pulse_release:b052_a04_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b052_a04_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Continuous input underperforms. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["continuous_input_underperforms"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Habituation requires repeated signaling but not necessarily continuous input or an episodic alternative.", "slug": "habituation_to_repeated_signal"}], "normalized_requirement": "Continuous input underperforms.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Continuous input underperforms.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires a post-response interval in which the receiver cannot respond normally to another input.", "role_mapping": "Receiver -> responsive system; absorption window -> nonrefractory interval.", "slug": "refractory_period", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b052_a04_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Receiver has absorption windows. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["receiver_has_absorption_windows"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Refractory Period", "one_liner": "Immediately after an action, a unit enters an intrinsic, self-imposed window during which it cannot repeat that action, capping its rate and preventing runaway re-triggering without external governance.", "page_ref": "prime:refractory_period", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Receiver -> responsive system; absorption window -> nonrefractory interval.", "slug": "refractory_period", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires a post-response interval in which the receiver cannot respond normally to another input."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The receiver has bounded absorption or response windows.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A refractory system can receive inputs continuously even though some are ineffective; designed spacing is not constitutive.", "slug": "refractory_period"}], "residual_id": "r:pulse_release:b052_a04_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b052_a04_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Response requires spacing. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["response_requires_spacing"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A refractory system can receive inputs continuously even though some are ineffective; designed spacing is not constitutive.", "slug": "refractory_period"}], "normalized_requirement": "Effective response requires spacing between inputs.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Effective response requires spacing between inputs.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Release can be bounded.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source states: Release can be bounded. The normalized feasibility condition is: Release can be bounded. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["release_can_be_bounded"]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "release_can_be_bounded"}, {"display_text": "Feedback is available.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source states: Feedback is available. The normalized feasibility condition is: Feedback is available. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["feedback_is_available"]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "feedback_is_available"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 52, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-052", "ledger_sha256": "cfa1322919e546c5fa235e4adef471dd958694c4849ba49de0d758ec7887aab2"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Purity-Pollution Boundary Governance", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:purity_pollution_boundary_governance", "slug": "purity_pollution_boundary_governance"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A community, organization, process, or technical system must distinguish what can safely or legitimately mix from what must be separated, cleansed, quarantined, or restored. If purity and pollution logic remains tacit, it can either fail to protect against real transfer or overreact by marking people, objects, spaces, or records as permanently contaminating.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A community, organization, process, or technical system must distinguish what can safely or legitimately mix from what must be separated, cleansed, quarantined, or restored. If purity and pollution logic remains tacit, it can either fail to protect against real transfer or overreact by marking people, objects, spaces, or records as permanently contaminating."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires contact or boundary crossing to transfer pollution status under a cultural or material classification.", "role_mapping": "Contact -> transfer event; status -> clean/polluted category.", "slug": "purity_and_pollution", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b052_a05_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Contact, association, proximity, lineage, reuse, data provenance, or symbolic participation can change status. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Contact, association, proximity, lineage, reuse, data provenance, or symbolic participation can change status."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Purity and Pollution", "one_liner": "Classifying things as clean or contaminating, with contagion and ritual cleansing.", "page_ref": "prime:purity_and_pollution", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Contact -> transfer event; status -> clean/polluted category.", "slug": "purity_and_pollution", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires contact or boundary crossing to transfer pollution status under a cultural or material classification."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Contact, association, proximity, lineage, reuse, provenance, or participation changes status.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record organizes entities and practices through purity, contamination, taboo, cleansing, and restoration states.", "role_mapping": "States -> purity classifications; restoration -> cleansing.", "slug": "purity_and_pollution", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b052_a05_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The system needs to distinguish clean, contaminated, uncertain, restricted, sacred/protected, or restored states. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The system needs to distinguish clean, contaminated, uncertain, restricted, sacred/protected, or restored states."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Purity and Pollution", "one_liner": "Classifying things as clean or contaminating, with contagion and ritual cleansing.", "page_ref": "prime:purity_and_pollution", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "States -> purity classifications; restoration -> cleansing.", "slug": "purity_and_pollution", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record organizes entities and practices through purity, contamination, taboo, cleansing, and restoration states."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The system distinguishes clean, contaminated, uncertain, restricted, protected, or restored states.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Pollution is treated as transmissible through contact and can propagate across a classification boundary.", "role_mapping": "Cascade -> contact chain; unwanted transfer -> pollution transmission.", "slug": "purity_and_pollution", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b052_a05_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "If purity and pollution logic remains tacit, it can either fail to protect against real transfer or overreact by marking people, objects, spaces, or records as permanently contaminating. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Unwanted transfer can cascade across spaces, networks, processes, groups, materials, or records.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Unwanted transfer can cascade across spaces, networks, processes, groups, materials, or records.", "If purity and pollution logic remains tacit, it can either fail to protect against real transfer or overreact by marking people, objects, spaces, or records as permanently contaminating."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Purity and Pollution", "one_liner": "Classifying things as clean or contaminating, with contagion and ritual cleansing.", "page_ref": "prime:purity_and_pollution", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Cascade -> contact chain; unwanted transfer -> pollution transmission.", "slug": "purity_and_pollution", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Pollution is treated as transmissible through contact and can propagate across a classification boundary."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Unwanted transfer can cascade across spaces, networks, processes, groups, materials, or records.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record explicitly spans material contamination and symbolic, moral, sacred, or social pollution.", "role_mapping": "Material risk -> contamination; symbolic meaning -> purity classification.", "slug": "purity_and_pollution", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b052_a05_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The same logic might mix material risk with symbolic meaning, moral status, religious practice, or social belonging. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The same logic might mix material risk with symbolic meaning, moral status, religious practice, or social belonging."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Purity and Pollution", "one_liner": "Classifying things as clean or contaminating, with contagion and ritual cleansing.", "page_ref": "prime:purity_and_pollution", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Material risk -> contamination; symbolic meaning -> purity classification.", "slug": "purity_and_pollution", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record explicitly spans material contamination and symbolic, moral, sacred, or social pollution."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The same logic mixes material risk with symbolic meaning, moral status, sacred practice, or belonging.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P091-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O4", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O4", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O4", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a purity-boundary governance setting.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A community or system governs purity, contamination, separation, or restoration decisions.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail unclear authority, not merely disagreement under a known decision maker.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Authority over the selected decision is unclear.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This authority branch requires uncertainty over who classifies the focal subject.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The unclear authority concerns classification as pure, polluted, safe, or unsafe.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This authority branch requires uncertainty over who authorizes restoration.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The unclear authority concerns restoration after pollution or exclusion.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This consequence branch requires authority ambiguity to cause dispute.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The authority ambiguity causes dispute.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This consequence branch requires authority ambiguity to cause fear.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The authority ambiguity causes fear.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This consequence branch requires authority ambiguity to cause stigma.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The authority ambiguity causes stigma.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This consequence branch requires authority ambiguity to cause unsafe reuse.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The authority ambiguity causes unsafe reuse.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Unclear classification or restoration authority causes one listed purity-governance harm.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "unclear purity-governance authority causes harm", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P091-C05-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A purity system can have undisputed authority and accepted restoration rules.", "slug": "purity_and_pollution"}], "residual_id": "r:purity_pollution_boundary_governance:b052_a05_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b052_a05_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Unclear authority over classification or restoration creates dispute, fear, stigma, or unsafe reuse. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Unclear authority over classification or restoration creates dispute, fear, stigma, or unsafe reuse."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A purity system can have undisputed authority and accepted restoration rules.", "slug": "purity_and_pollution"}], "normalized_requirement": "Unclear classification or restoration authority creates dispute, fear, stigma, or unsafe reuse.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Unclear classification or restoration authority creates dispute, fear, stigma, or unsafe reuse.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Cleansing, quarantine, disposal, reclassification, or reintegration must be accepted as legitimate by participants.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: Cleansing, quarantine, disposal, reclassification, or reintegration must be accepted as legitimate by participants. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Cleansing, quarantine, disposal, reclassification, or reintegration must be accepted as legitimate by participants."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Cleansing, quarantine, disposal, reclassification, or reintegration must be accepted as legitimate by participants."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 52, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-052", "ledger_sha256": "cfa1322919e546c5fa235e4adef471dd958694c4849ba49de0d758ec7887aab2"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Purpose Alignment Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:purpose_alignment_design", "slug": "purpose_alignment_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 4 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is means-end drift. A means that once served a purpose can become an end in itself. A metric can replace the outcome it was meant to approximate. A role can survive after its function changes. A product can optimize engagement while failing the user outcome it claims to support.\n\nThis happens because systems accumulate inertia. Means are easier to see than ends; outputs are easier to measure than purpose; existing activity has owners and budgets; and proxy measures often become targets. Purpose Alignment Design interrupts that drift by asking: what is this for, what would it look like if it were working, and does this current means materially serve that end?", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A process, tool, role, or organization continues operating without clear connection to the purpose it was meant to serve."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A need-solution alignment can be explicit and strong.", "slug": "need_solution_alignment"}], "residual_id": "r:purpose_alignment_design:b052_a06_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b052_a06_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A process, role, product feature, metric, policy, or program continues despite unclear contribution to the stated purpose. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A process, role, product feature, metric, policy, or program continues despite unclear contribution to the stated purpose."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A need-solution alignment can be explicit and strong.", "slug": "need_solution_alignment"}], "normalized_requirement": "A process or program continues despite unclear contribution to its stated purpose.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A process or program continues despite unclear contribution to its stated purpose.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A teleological account can specify one agreed end.", "slug": "teleology"}], "residual_id": "r:purpose_alignment_design:b052_a06_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b052_a06_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: People agree on activity but not on what end the activity is supposed to serve. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["People agree on activity but not on what end the activity is supposed to serve."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A teleological account can specify one agreed end.", "slug": "teleology"}], "normalized_requirement": "People agree on activity but not its end.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "People agree on activity but not its end.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires optimization pressure on a proxy measure to break its relation to the target objective.", "role_mapping": "Metric -> proxy; real purpose -> target; local optimization -> pressure.", "slug": "goodharts_law", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b052_a06_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Local optimization improves a proxy measure while the real purpose is stagnant, harmed, or invisible. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Local optimization improves a proxy measure while the real purpose is stagnant, harmed, or invisible."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Goodhart's Law", "one_liner": "When a proxy is placed under binding optimization pressure, its correlation with the construct it was meant to indicate collapses.", "page_ref": "prime:goodharts_law", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Metric -> proxy; real purpose -> target; local optimization -> pressure.", "slug": "goodharts_law", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires optimization pressure on a proxy measure to break its relation to the target objective."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A proxy metric improves while the real purpose is stagnant or harmed.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A teleological function can continue serving the same end under stable conditions.", "slug": "teleology"}], "residual_id": "r:purpose_alignment_design:b052_a06_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b052_a06_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A legacy function once served a valid purpose but conditions have changed. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A legacy function once served a valid purpose but conditions have changed."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A teleological function can continue serving the same end under stable conditions.", "slug": "teleology"}], "normalized_requirement": "A legacy function once served its purpose but conditions changed.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A legacy function once served its purpose but conditions changed.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A decision requires choosing among competing means, and the choice cannot be settled without clarifying the end state.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It also fits when a team needs to choose among competing means and cannot decide responsibly until the end state is clear. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: A decision requires choosing among competing means, and the choice cannot be settled without clarifying the end state. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A decision requires choosing among competing means, and the choice cannot be settled without clarifying the end state.", "It also fits when a team needs to choose among competing means and cannot decide responsibly until the end state is clear."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "A decision requires choosing among competing means, and the choice cannot be settled without clarifying the end state."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 52, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-052", "ledger_sha256": "cfa1322919e546c5fa235e4adef471dd958694c4849ba49de0d758ec7887aab2"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Push-Pull Decoupling Point Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:push_pull_decoupling_point_design", "slug": "push_pull_decoupling_point_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A flow is managed as all-push or all-pull even though different stages face different uncertainty, standardization, and response-time economics.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A flow is managed as all-push or all-pull even though different stages face different uncertainty, standardization, and response-time economics."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires forecast-driven upstream flow to meet order-driven downstream flow at a boundary chosen under demand uncertainty.", "role_mapping": "Demand uncertainty -> forecast error; final mix -> order-specific configuration.", "slug": "decoupling_point", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b052_a07_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Demand is uncertain in final mix, timing, configuration, location, priority, or service context. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Demand is uncertain in final mix, timing, configuration, location, priority, or service context."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Decoupling Point", "one_liner": "The buffered interface where a flow splits from forecast-driven push upstream into order-driven pull downstream, and whose position sets the lead-time, inventory, and customisation trade-offs.", "page_ref": "prime:decoupling_point", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Demand uncertainty -> forecast error; final mix -> order-specific configuration.", "slug": "decoupling_point", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires forecast-driven upstream flow to meet order-driven downstream flow at a boundary chosen under demand uncertainty."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Final demand mix, timing, configuration, location, priority, or context is uncertain.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires standardized or generic work before the customer-order signal.", "role_mapping": "Upstream preparation -> push region; unknown demand -> forecast horizon.", "slug": "decoupling_point", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b052_a07_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Some upstream work can be prepared, standardized, pooled, batched, or reserved before the final demand signal is known. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Some upstream work can be prepared, standardized, pooled, batched, or reserved before the final demand signal is known."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Decoupling Point", "one_liner": "The buffered interface where a flow splits from forecast-driven push upstream into order-driven pull downstream, and whose position sets the lead-time, inventory, and customisation trade-offs.", "page_ref": "prime:decoupling_point", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Upstream preparation -> push region; unknown demand -> forecast horizon.", "slug": "decoupling_point", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires standardized or generic work before the customer-order signal."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Some generic upstream work can be prepared before final demand is known.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires downstream differentiation to begin from the actual demand signal.", "role_mapping": "Actual order -> pull signal; adaptation -> downstream customization.", "slug": "decoupling_point", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b052_a07_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Downstream fulfillment must still adapt to actual orders, cases, users, incidents, or contexts. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Downstream fulfillment must still adapt to actual orders, cases, users, incidents, or contexts."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Decoupling Point", "one_liner": "The buffered interface where a flow splits from forecast-driven push upstream into order-driven pull downstream, and whose position sets the lead-time, inventory, and customisation trade-offs.", "page_ref": "prime:decoupling_point", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Actual order -> pull signal; adaptation -> downstream customization.", "slug": "decoupling_point", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires downstream differentiation to begin from the actual demand signal."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Downstream fulfillment must adapt to actual orders, cases, users, incidents, or contexts.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact prime already specifies an explicit boundary, so a valid instance need not lack one.", "slug": "decoupling_point"}], "residual_id": "r:push_pull_decoupling_point_design:b052_a07_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b052_a07_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: No accountable boundary states where forecast risk ends and order-specific commitment begins. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["No accountable boundary states where forecast risk ends and order-specific commitment begins."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact prime already specifies an explicit boundary, so a valid instance need not lack one.", "slug": "decoupling_point"}], "normalized_requirement": "No accountable boundary marks where forecast risk ends and order commitment begins.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "No accountable boundary marks where forecast risk ends and order commitment begins.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The system experiences recurring tension among long lead times, excess inventory, low customization, stockouts, expediting, or rework.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The system experiences recurring tension among long lead times, excess inventory, low customization, stockouts, expediting, or rework. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The system experiences recurring tension among long lead times, excess inventory, low customization, stockouts, expediting, or rework."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The system experiences recurring tension among long lead times, excess inventory, low customization, stockouts, expediting, or rework."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 52, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-052", "ledger_sha256": "cfa1322919e546c5fa235e4adef471dd958694c4849ba49de0d758ec7887aab2"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Queue Aging and Starvation Prevention", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:queue_aging_and_starvation_prevention", "slug": "queue_aging_and_starvation_prevention"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is repeated bypass. A service system has limited capacity and a rule that favors some work: high priority, high value, short duration, urgent risk, influential customer, nearby geography, or easy completion. That rule may be locally sensible. But because new favored work keeps arriving, disfavored work can remain perpetually behind.\n\nThis creates a tail-pathology: the system’s averages can look healthy while a minority of items wait far beyond acceptable limits. The harm is often invisible because the old items are not active, not loud, or not measured in the headline metric.\n\nAging and starvation prevention treats the oldest unresolved cases as evidence about the queue’s structure. The question is not only “what should be served next?” but also “what has been bypassed for too long under the current rule?”", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A waiting system repeatedly serves some classes, priorities, or items while others remain queued indefinitely or beyond acceptable limits."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires an eligible queued participant to be perpetually denied by locally rational priority scheduling.", "role_mapping": "Low-priority work -> eligible participant; bypass -> repeated denial.", "slug": "starvation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b052_a08_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: a priority, class, triage, or efficiency rule can repeatedly bypass low-priority work. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["a priority, class, triage, or efficiency rule can repeatedly bypass low-priority work"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Starvation", "one_liner": "A participant who is eligible and in the queue is perpetually denied service, not by exclusion but because a locally rational priority rule always picks someone else.", "page_ref": "prime:starvation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Low-priority work -> eligible participant; bypass -> repeated denial.", "slug": "starvation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires an eligible queued participant to be perpetually denied by locally rational priority scheduling."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A priority or efficiency rule repeatedly bypasses low-priority eligible work.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires eligibility and continued waiting with no finite service guarantee.", "role_mapping": "Old item -> waiting participant; path to service -> fairness guarantee.", "slug": "starvation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b052_a08_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: older queued items lack a reliable path to service, review, escalation, or explicit disposition. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["older queued items lack a reliable path to service, review, escalation, or explicit disposition"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Starvation", "one_liner": "A participant who is eligible and in the queue is perpetually denied service, not by exclusion but because a locally rational priority rule always picks someone else.", "page_ref": "prime:starvation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Old item -> waiting participant; path to service -> fairness guarantee.", "slug": "starvation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires eligibility and continued waiting with no finite service guarantee."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Older queued items lack a reliable path to service, review, escalation, or disposition.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Starvation can coexist with high aggregate throughput because denial is concentrated on one eligible class.", "role_mapping": "Average throughput -> aggregate service; minority tail -> starved class.", "slug": "starvation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b052_a08_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: average throughput looks acceptable while a minority of items wait excessively. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["average throughput looks acceptable while a minority of items wait excessively"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Starvation", "one_liner": "A participant who is eligible and in the queue is perpetually denied service, not by exclusion but because a locally rational priority rule always picks someone else.", "page_ref": "prime:starvation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Average throughput -> aggregate service; minority tail -> starved class.", "slug": "starvation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Starvation can coexist with high aggregate throughput because denial is concentrated on one eligible class."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Average throughput is acceptable while a minority waits excessively.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "tail waiting times matter ethically, legally, operationally, or politically.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This creates a tail-pathology: the system’s averages can look healthy while a minority of items wait far beyond acceptable limits. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: tail waiting times matter ethically, legally, operationally, or politically. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["tail waiting times matter ethically, legally, operationally, or politically", "This creates a tail-pathology: the system’s averages can look healthy while a minority of items wait far beyond acceptable limits."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "tail waiting times matter ethically, legally, operationally, or politically"}, {"display_text": "the system cannot simply remove priority distinctions because urgency, risk, or value still matter.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when the queue has real priority distinctions, but those distinctions produce a neglected tail. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: the system cannot simply remove priority distinctions because urgency, risk, or value still matter. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["the system cannot simply remove priority distinctions because urgency, risk, or value still matter", "Use this archetype when the queue has real priority distinctions, but those distinctions produce a neglected tail."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "the system cannot simply remove priority distinctions because urgency, risk, or value still matter"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 52, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-052", "ledger_sha256": "cfa1322919e546c5fa235e4adef471dd958694c4849ba49de0d758ec7887aab2"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Queue Discipline Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:queue_discipline_design", "slug": "queue_discipline_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 4 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a three-part pattern:\n\n1. a set of eligible items is waiting;\n2. a service point cannot handle all items at once;\n3. the order of service changes outcomes.\n\nWhen this structure is left unmanaged, order defaults to arrival pressure, convenience, visibility, informal privilege, or operator habit. That can produce avoidable harm: urgent items wait too long, quiet actors are ignored, easy work displaces important work, or stakeholders lose trust because order appears arbitrary.\n\nThe root tension is that every order rule privileges something. FIFO privileges arrival time. Priority rules privilege urgency, risk, value, or status. Shortest-job rules privilege throughput. Rotation privileges balanced attention. There is no order rule that is neutral for every purpose, so the system must choose and govern the principle it wants to preserve.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A waiting set exists, service capacity is limited, and accidental or discretionary service order produces unfairness, inefficiency, starvation, unmanaged urgency, or risk."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires arrivals, waiting items, finite servers, service times, and a queue discipline.", "role_mapping": "Items -> customers/jobs; service point -> server; constrained capacity -> service rate.", "slug": "queueing", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b052_a09_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Work, requests, people, cases, jobs, or packets wait for a constrained service point. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Work, requests, people, cases, jobs, or packets wait for a constrained service point."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Queueing", "one_liner": "Organizes tasks into a waiting line based on arrival and service rates.", "page_ref": "prime:queueing", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Items -> customers/jobs; service point -> server; constrained capacity -> service rate.", "slug": "queueing", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires arrivals, waiting items, finite servers, service times, and a queue discipline."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Work or people wait for a capacity-constrained service point.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Starvation concerns indefinite denial, not every consequential ordering effect.", "slug": "starvation"}], "residual_id": "r:queue_discipline_design:b052_a09_c2", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b052_a09_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The order of service changes outcomes, legitimacy, safety, cost, or throughput. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The order of service changes outcomes, legitimacy, safety, cost, or throughput."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Starvation concerns indefinite denial, not every consequential ordering effect.", "slug": "starvation"}], "normalized_requirement": "Service order changes legitimacy, safety, cost, throughput, or outcomes.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Service order changes legitimacy, safety, cost, throughput, or outcomes.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Starvation can arise under priority scheduling even when arrival order is not used.", "slug": "starvation"}], "residual_id": "r:queue_discipline_design:b052_a09_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b052_a09_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Arrival order alone is either too arbitrary, too easy to game, or too blind to urgency and risk. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Arrival order alone is either too arbitrary, too easy to game, or too blind to urgency and risk."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Starvation can arise under priority scheduling even when arrival order is not used.", "slug": "starvation"}], "normalized_requirement": "Arrival order is too arbitrary, gameable, or blind to urgency and risk.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Arrival order is too arbitrary, gameable, or blind to urgency and risk.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P091-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve queue operators choosing among items in a waiting set.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Operators choose which items from a queue receive service.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the selected operator behavior as operative in queue service selection.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The operators' selected behavior determines which queued item receives service or its service order.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires selective picking of favored queued items rather than application of a neutral queue discipline.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Operators cherry-pick queued items.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires service choices improvised case by case without a settled queue discipline.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Operators improvise queue service selections.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires informal selection criteria that vary inconsistently across queued items or decisions.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Operators use inconsistent informal criteria for queue service selections.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Queue operators select work through one listed discretionary behavior.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "queue service selection follows a listed discretionary behavior", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P091-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An incentive-compatible mechanism need not govern a service queue.", "slug": "incentive_compatibility"}], "residual_id": "r:queue_discipline_design:b052_a09_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b052_a09_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Operators are cherry-picking, improvising, or using inconsistent informal criteria. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Operators are cherry-picking, improvising, or using inconsistent informal criteria."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An incentive-compatible mechanism need not govern a service queue.", "slug": "incentive_compatibility"}], "normalized_requirement": "Operators cherry-pick or apply inconsistent informal criteria.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Operators cherry-pick or apply inconsistent informal criteria.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Stakeholders need to understand why one waiting item was served before another.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially relevant when stakeholders ask why one item moved ahead of another, when urgent work is buried behind routine work, when easy work is cherry-picked, or when low-priority work waits indefinitely. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: Stakeholders need to understand why one waiting item was served before another. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders need to understand why one waiting item was served before another.", "It is especially relevant when stakeholders ask why one item moved ahead of another, when urgent work is buried behind routine work, when easy work is cherry-picked, or when low-priority work waits indefinitely."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Stakeholders need to understand why one waiting item was served before another."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 52, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-052", "ledger_sha256": "cfa1322919e546c5fa235e4adef471dd958694c4849ba49de0d758ec7887aab2"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Queue Draining", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:queue_draining", "slug": "queue_draining"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 4 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A queue can accumulate to the point where normal service assumptions no longer hold. The system may still have work waiting, but it may also need to shut down, migrate, recover, reopen admission, or protect downstream capacity. The backlog creates delayed overload: the problem seems postponed, but it will reappear when the queued work is released or rediscovered.\n\nThe structural failure is ambiguity. Which items are still valid? Which must be served first? Which can be expired or transferred? How much new demand can enter while old work is cleared? When is the system safe to change state? Queue Draining answers these questions with a temporary governance structure around the backlog.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A queue has accumulated enough work that ordinary operation, shutdown, recovery, or transition would be unsafe or misleading without controlled drainage."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P091-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a backlog and the ordinary service process expected to handle it.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A queue contains accumulated work awaiting ordinary service.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve backlog-above-capacity direction, not merely a nonempty queue.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The accumulated work exceeds the selected absorption limit of ordinary service.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires backlog beyond safe ordinary-service absorption.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The exceeded limit is what ordinary service can absorb safely.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires backlog beyond honestly representable ordinary-service absorption.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The exceeded limit is what ordinary service can honestly claim to absorb.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Accumulated queued work exceeds a safe or honestly representable ordinary-service absorption limit.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "queue backlog exceeds ordinary service absorption", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P091-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A queue can be short and stable below capacity.", "slug": "queueing"}], "residual_id": "r:queue_draining:b052_a10_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b052_a10_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: queued work has accumulated beyond what ordinary service can safely or honestly absorb. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["queued work has accumulated beyond what ordinary service can safely or honestly absorb"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A queue can be short and stable below capacity.", "slug": "queueing"}], "normalized_requirement": "Queued work exceeds what ordinary service can safely or honestly absorb.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Queued work exceeds what ordinary service can safely or honestly absorb.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A stable queue can have service rate above arrivals and drain normally.", "slug": "queueing"}], "residual_id": "r:queue_draining:b052_a10_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b052_a10_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: new arrivals continue to obscure the existing backlog or make it impossible to reduce. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["new arrivals continue to obscure the existing backlog or make it impossible to reduce"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A stable queue can have service rate above arrivals and drain normally.", "slug": "queueing"}], "normalized_requirement": "New arrivals obscure the backlog or prevent its reduction.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "New arrivals obscure the backlog or prevent its reduction.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P091-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a shared queue containing multiple items.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "One queue contains multiple items awaiting disposition or service.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a mixture, not a homogeneous queue with one item state.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "At least two materially different item states are present in the queue.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve operationally material state heterogeneity.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The differing states concern validity, duplication, risk, urgency, or dependency constraints relevant to drainage.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "A backlog mixes items with materially different validity, risk, urgency, or dependency states.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "queue contains heterogeneous item states", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P091-C08-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Queue items can be homogeneous and valid.", "slug": "queueing"}], "residual_id": "r:queue_draining:b052_a10_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b052_a10_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: the queue contains a mixture of valid, stale, duplicate, risky, urgent, or dependency-constrained items. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["the queue contains a mixture of valid, stale, duplicate, risky, urgent, or dependency-constrained items"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Queue items can be homogeneous and valid.", "slug": "queueing"}], "normalized_requirement": "The queue mixes valid, stale, duplicate, risky, urgent, or dependency-blocked items.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The queue mixes valid, stale, duplicate, risky, urgent, or dependency-blocked items.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires downstream capacity limits to propagate upstream and regulate release rather than allowing overload.", "role_mapping": "Downstream overload -> saturated consumer; queued release -> producer flow.", "slug": "backpressure", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b052_a10_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: resuming normal operation would release delayed overload downstream. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["resuming normal operation would release delayed overload downstream"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Backpressure", "one_liner": "A return signal from a downstream stage throttles upstream production to its own capacity, converting a one-way push into a two-way conversation that holds the system at the bottleneck's throughput instead of accumulating hidden queue debt.", "page_ref": "prime:backpressure", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Downstream overload -> saturated consumer; queued release -> producer flow.", "slug": "backpressure", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires downstream capacity limits to propagate upstream and regulate release rather than allowing overload."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Normal restart would release delayed overload downstream.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "a shutdown, migration, maintenance window, policy transition, or recovery event requires knowing what will happen to existing queued work.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A queue has accumulated enough work that ordinary operation, shutdown, recovery, or transition would be unsafe or misleading without controlled drainage. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: a shutdown, migration, maintenance window, policy transition, or recovery event requires knowing what will happen to existing queued work. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["a shutdown, migration, maintenance window, policy transition, or recovery event requires knowing what will happen to existing queued work", "A queue has accumulated enough work that ordinary operation, shutdown, recovery, or transition would be unsafe or misleading without controlled drainage."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "a shutdown, migration, maintenance window, policy transition, or recovery event requires knowing what will happen to existing queued work"}, {"display_text": "stakeholders need an explicit answer about which queued obligations will be completed, deferred, transferred, expired, or rejected.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The backlog creates delayed overload: the problem seems postponed, but it will reappear when the queued work is released or rediscovered. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: stakeholders need an explicit answer about which queued obligations will be completed, deferred, transferred, expired, or rejected. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["stakeholders need an explicit answer about which queued obligations will be completed, deferred, transferred, expired, or rejected", "The backlog creates delayed overload: the problem seems postponed, but it will reappear when the queued work is released or rediscovered."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "stakeholders need an explicit answer about which queued obligations will be completed, deferred, transferred, expired, or rejected"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 52, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-052", "ledger_sha256": "cfa1322919e546c5fa235e4adef471dd958694c4849ba49de0d758ec7887aab2"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Queue Partitioning", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:queue_partitioning", "slug": "queue_partitioning"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 6, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 7 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 7}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is mixed waiting under scarce or specialized capacity. A single queue treats items as if they can be served by the same rule and the same capacity path, even when they cannot. The result is service mismatch: some work waits behind the wrong kind of work, some handlers receive items they are not equipped to serve, and some categories of need become invisible inside the aggregate backlog.\n\nThis can produce head-of-line blocking, misrouting, fairness disputes, manual cherry-picking, hidden starvation, and poor service-level control. The queue appears simple, but its simplicity is false because it conceals meaningful differences.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Different classes of work, actors, or requests wait in the same queue even though they require different service paths, durations, priorities, risks, capabilities, or fairness treatment. The shared queue causes avoidable delay, head-of-line blocking, misrouting, overloaded generalists, hidden class-specific backlog, or unjust cross-class interference."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P091-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve multiple item classes sharing one waiting set.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "At least two classes of items wait in the same queue.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a consequential cross-class difference, not a nominal label difference.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The item classes differ materially along the selected service dimension.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires heterogeneous service requirements.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The classes have materially different service requirements or paths.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires heterogeneous service durations.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The classes have materially different service times.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "One queue mixes item classes with materially different service requirements or times.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "shared queue mixes heterogeneous service classes", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P091-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Sharding can partition homogeneous load solely for scale.", "slug": "sharding"}], "residual_id": "r:queue_partitioning:b052_a11_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b052_a11_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: a single queue contains items with materially different service requirements or service times. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["a single queue contains items with materially different service requirements or service times"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Sharding can partition homogeneous load solely for scale.", "slug": "sharding"}], "normalized_requirement": "One queue mixes items with materially different service requirements or times.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "One queue mixes items with materially different service requirements or times.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires one eligible class to be repeatedly bypassed by another under a priority rule.", "role_mapping": "Delayed class -> starved participant; crowding class -> favored work.", "slug": "starvation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b052_a11_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: one class of item repeatedly delays or crowds out another class. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["one class of item repeatedly delays or crowds out another class"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Starvation", "one_liner": "A participant who is eligible and in the queue is perpetually denied service, not by exclusion but because a locally rational priority rule always picks someone else.", "page_ref": "prime:starvation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Delayed class -> starved participant; crowding class -> favored work.", "slug": "starvation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires one eligible class to be repeatedly bypassed by another under a priority rule."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "One eligible class repeatedly delays or crowds out another.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P091-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an urgent or safety-sensitive item mixed into routine queued work without requiring that urgency itself imply high consequence.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A routine backlog and a selected urgent or safety-sensitive item share one queue or service path.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve susceptibility to burial rather than guaranteed prompt identification.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The selected item can be buried, delayed, or obscured within the routine backlog.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires an urgent item buried in routine backlog.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The buried item is urgent.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a safety-sensitive item buried in routine backlog.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The buried item is safety-sensitive.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "An urgent or safety-sensitive item can be buried in routine backlog.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "urgent or safety-sensitive item can be buried in routine backlog", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P091-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Starvation can affect low-priority items rather than urgent ones.", "slug": "starvation"}], "residual_id": "r:queue_partitioning:b052_a11_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b052_a11_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: urgent or safety-sensitive items can be buried in routine backlog. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["urgent or safety-sensitive items can be buried in routine backlog"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Starvation can affect low-priority items rather than urgent ones.", "slug": "starvation"}], "normalized_requirement": "Urgent or safety-sensitive items are buried in routine backlog.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Urgent or safety-sensitive items are buried in routine backlog.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P091-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve distinct simple and complex work roles in one queue.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Simple and complex work items wait in the same queue or service path.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the complex-before-simple queue ordering.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The simple work waits behind the complex work.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the directional service-time difference.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The simple work could be completed more quickly than the complex work ahead of it.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Quickly serviceable simple work waits behind slower complex work.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "short simple work is blocked behind long complex work", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P091-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A scheduling system can use shortest-job-first and avoid this failure.", "slug": "scheduling"}], "residual_id": "r:queue_partitioning:b052_a11_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b052_a11_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: simple work waits behind complex work even though it could be completed quickly. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["simple work waits behind complex work even though it could be completed quickly"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A scheduling system can use shortest-job-first and avoid this failure.", "slug": "scheduling"}], "normalized_requirement": "Simple work waits behind complex work despite being quickly serviceable.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Simple work waits behind complex work despite being quickly serviceable.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P091-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve specialized work and its distinct service needs.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A work item has specialized service requirements.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve incorrect specialized-to-general routing, not a capable generalist path.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The item is routed to a general service path that does not fit those requirements.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve recurrence rather than one accidental routing error.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The misrouting occurs repeatedly.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}], "predicate": "Specialized work is repeatedly routed to a general service path that does not fit it.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "specialized queue item is repeatedly misrouted to general service", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P091-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A shard can route homogeneous items correctly.", "slug": "sharding"}], "residual_id": "r:queue_partitioning:b052_a11_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b052_a11_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: specialized work is repeatedly misrouted to general service paths. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["specialized work is repeatedly misrouted to general service paths"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A shard can route homogeneous items correctly.", "slug": "sharding"}], "normalized_requirement": "Specialized work is misrouted to general service paths.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Specialized work is misrouted to general service paths.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A blockage can release abruptly rather than stall routine flow in a queue.", "slug": "blockage_release_dynamics"}], "residual_id": "r:queue_partitioning:b052_a11_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b052_a11_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: exceptions, blocked items, or incomplete cases stall routine flow. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["exceptions, blocked items, or incomplete cases stall routine flow"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A blockage can release abruptly rather than stall routine flow in a queue.", "slug": "blockage_release_dynamics"}], "normalized_requirement": "Exceptions or blocked cases stall routine flow.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Exceptions or blocked cases stall routine flow.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Partition-dependent aggregates can change numerically without hiding a service failure.", "slug": "partition_dependence_of_aggregates"}], "residual_id": "r:queue_partitioning:b052_a11_c7", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b052_a11_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: aggregate queue metrics hide class-specific service failures. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["aggregate queue metrics hide class-specific service failures"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Partition-dependent aggregates can change numerically without hiding a service failure.", "slug": "partition_dependence_of_aggregates"}], "normalized_requirement": "Aggregate metrics hide class-specific service failures.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Aggregate metrics hide class-specific service failures.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 52, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-052", "ledger_sha256": "cfa1322919e546c5fa235e4adef471dd958694c4849ba49de0d758ec7887aab2"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Queue Reservation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:queue_reservation", "slug": "queue_reservation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 2 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 2}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A queue exists because service capacity is scarce, but the system requires actors or items to continuously occupy the waiting channel to preserve access. That transfers operational scarcity onto the waiter: time, space, attention, physical presence, digital presence, travel, or channel occupancy. Actors who cannot afford that burden lose access even when they arrived legitimately.\n\nThe visible symptoms are long physical lines, long phone holds, crowded lobbies, repeated status inquiries, conflict over place, abandonment, duplicate bookings, and informal lists that operators cannot audit. Reservation reduces the waiting burden, but it can also create new pathologies if the reservation layer is opaque or inaccessible.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Physical, synchronous, or continuous waiting imposes unnecessary cost, congestion, exclusion, lost productive time, uncertainty, or service-channel occupancy even though the system could preserve order through a durable representation of place or service opportunity."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P091-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve an actor and a queue-based service-access claim.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An actor seeks to preserve a place, opportunity, or access claim in a service queue.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve presence as a condition of access retention.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Maintaining the selected continuous presence is necessary to preserve that access.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires physical in-person waiting to preserve access.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The required presence is waiting in person.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires remaining on hold to preserve access.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The required presence is remaining on hold.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires continued login to preserve access.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The required presence is remaining logged in.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires continued screen monitoring to preserve access.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The required presence is watching a screen.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires keeping work active to preserve access.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The required presence is keeping work active.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "An actor must maintain one listed form of continuous presence to preserve service access.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "service access requires continuous synchronous presence", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P091-C13-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A persistent position can exist without any waiting actor.", "slug": "potential_occupancy_region"}], "residual_id": "r:queue_reservation:b052_a12_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b052_a12_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: actors must wait in person, on hold, logged in, watching a screen, or keeping work active to preserve access. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["actors must wait in person, on hold, logged in, watching a screen, or keeping work active to preserve access"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A persistent position can exist without any waiting actor.", "slug": "potential_occupancy_region"}], "normalized_requirement": "Actors must remain physically or synchronously present to preserve access.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Actors must remain physically or synchronously present to preserve access.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P091-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve the actor's claim as legitimate apart from waiting capacity.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An actor has an otherwise legitimate claim to service or queue access.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must entail inability to wait physically, not mere unwillingness.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The actor cannot satisfy a physical waiting requirement.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve inability-to-wait as the cause of disadvantage.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "That inability causes the actor to receive worse access, priority, or service.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Actors unable to wait physically are disadvantaged despite having legitimate service claims.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "physical waiting requirement disadvantages legitimate claimants", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P091-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Starvation need not arise from inability to wait physically.", "slug": "starvation"}], "residual_id": "r:queue_reservation:b052_a12_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b052_a12_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: actors who cannot physically wait are disadvantaged even when their claims are otherwise legitimate. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["actors who cannot physically wait are disadvantaged even when their claims are otherwise legitimate"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Starvation need not arise from inability to wait physically.", "slug": "starvation"}], "normalized_requirement": "Actors unable to wait physically are disadvantaged despite legitimate claims.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Actors unable to wait physically are disadvantaged despite legitimate claims.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "the waiting environment is crowded, unsafe, expensive, stigmatizing, stressful, or operationally disruptive.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: the waiting environment is crowded, unsafe, expensive, stigmatizing, stressful, or operationally disruptive. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["the waiting environment is crowded, unsafe, expensive, stigmatizing, stressful, or operationally disruptive"]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "the waiting environment is crowded, unsafe, expensive, stigmatizing, stressful, or operationally disruptive"}, {"display_text": "service capacity is scarce enough that unrestricted arrival creates long lines but predictable enough that positions or windows can be represented.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A queue exists because service capacity is scarce, but the system requires actors or items to continuously occupy the waiting channel to preserve access. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: service capacity is scarce enough that unrestricted arrival creates long lines but predictable enough that positions or windows can be represented. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["service capacity is scarce enough that unrestricted arrival creates long lines but predictable enough that positions or windows can be represented", "A queue exists because service capacity is scarce, but the system requires actors or items to continuously occupy the waiting channel to preserve access."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "service capacity is scarce enough that unrestricted arrival creates long lines but predictable enough that positions or windows can be represented"}, {"display_text": "open waiting causes abandonment, repeated inquiries, conflict over place, or hidden inequity in who can afford to wait.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The visible symptoms are long physical lines, long phone holds, crowded lobbies, repeated status inquiries, conflict over place, abandonment, duplicate bookings, and informal lists that operators cannot audit. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: open waiting causes abandonment, repeated inquiries, conflict over place, or hidden inequity in who can afford to wait. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["open waiting causes abandonment, repeated inquiries, conflict over place, or hidden inequity in who can afford to wait", "The visible symptoms are long physical lines, long phone holds, crowded lobbies, repeated status inquiries, conflict over place, abandonment, duplicate bookings, and informal lists that operators cannot audit."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "open waiting causes abandonment, repeated inquiries, conflict over place, or hidden inequity in who can afford to wait"}, {"display_text": "the queue needs to preserve order or access, but not continuous physical or synchronous presence.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Physical, synchronous, or continuous waiting imposes unnecessary cost, congestion, exclusion, lost productive time, uncertainty, or service-channel occupancy even though the system could preserve order through a durable representation of place or service opportunity. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: the queue needs to preserve order or access, but not continuous physical or synchronous presence. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["the queue needs to preserve order or access, but not continuous physical or synchronous presence", "Physical, synchronous, or continuous waiting imposes unnecessary cost, congestion, exclusion, lost productive time, uncertainty, or service-channel occupancy even though the system could preserve order through a durable representation of place or service opportunity."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "the queue needs to preserve order or access, but not continuous physical or synchronous presence"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 52, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-052", "ledger_sha256": "cfa1322919e546c5fa235e4adef471dd958694c4849ba49de0d758ec7887aab2"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Rapid Prototype Learning Loop", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:rapid_prototype_learning_loop", "slug": "rapid_prototype_learning_loop"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is premature commitment under design uncertainty. Teams often move from idea to implementation because the idea sounds plausible, because stakeholders want progress, or because documentation creates an illusion of clarity. The first serious encounter with users, implementers, constraints, or operating conditions then occurs at launch, where failure is expensive and socially difficult to reverse.\n\nA second version of the problem is abstract debate. Different participants may imagine different systems while using the same words. The prototype acts as a shared object of attention. It exposes whether the disagreement is about the goal, the sequence, the interface, the operating model, the evidence standard, or the assumptions underneath the design.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A team risks investing heavily in a concept, interface, process, policy, or physical design before the assumptions behind it have encountered users, implementers, constraints, or simulated operating conditions."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record builds a partial representation to test uncertain design assumptions before full implementation.", "role_mapping": "Speculative assumption -> learning question; design -> prototype target.", "slug": "design_prototyping", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b052_a13_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A consequential design assumption is still speculative. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A consequential design assumption is still speculative."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Design Prototyping", "one_liner": "Early models for testing.", "page_ref": "prime:design_prototyping", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Speculative assumption -> learning question; design -> prototype target.", "slug": "design_prototyping", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record builds a partial representation to test uncertain design assumptions before full implementation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A consequential design assumption remains speculative.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record trades cheap partial construction for early feedback before expensive commitment.", "role_mapping": "Small test -> prototype; full implementation -> production artifact.", "slug": "design_prototyping", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b052_a13_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The cost of a small test is much lower than the cost of full implementation. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The cost of a small test is much lower than the cost of full implementation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Design Prototyping", "one_liner": "Early models for testing.", "page_ref": "prime:design_prototyping", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Small test -> prototype; full implementation -> production artifact.", "slug": "design_prototyping", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record trades cheap partial construction for early feedback before expensive commitment."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A small test costs much less than full implementation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record externalizes a concept into an interactive or inspectable artifact so assumptions encounter evidence.", "role_mapping": "Abstract debate -> untested concept; artifact -> prototype.", "slug": "design_prototyping", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b052_a13_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: People are debating an idea in abstractions or documents only. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["People are debating an idea in abstractions or documents only."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Design Prototyping", "one_liner": "Early models for testing.", "page_ref": "prime:design_prototyping", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Abstract debate -> untested concept; artifact -> prototype.", "slug": "design_prototyping", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record externalizes a concept into an interactive or inspectable artifact so assumptions encounter evidence."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The idea is debated only in abstractions or documents.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Prototyping can be useful even when the next implementation step is reversible and cheap.", "slug": "design_prototyping"}], "residual_id": "r:rapid_prototype_learning_loop:b052_a13_c4", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b052_a13_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The next implementation step would create commitment, sunk cost, or stakeholder lock-in. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The next implementation step would create commitment, sunk cost, or stakeholder lock-in."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Prototyping can be useful even when the next implementation step is reversible and cheap.", "slug": "design_prototyping"}], "normalized_requirement": "The next implementation step creates sunk cost or stakeholder lock-in.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The next implementation step creates sunk cost or stakeholder lock-in.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 52, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-052", "ledger_sha256": "cfa1322919e546c5fa235e4adef471dd958694c4849ba49de0d758ec7887aab2"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Ratchet Control and Release Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:ratchet_control_and_release_design", "slug": "ratchet_control_and_release_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system accepts incremental movement in one direction while making reverse movement slower, costlier, politically harder, technically unsafe, procedurally unnamed, or socially illegible. Each step is locally defensible, but the accumulated displacement changes the operating baseline, narrows future options, and eventually creates lock-in, creep, or intervention-stack burden.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system accepts incremental movement in one direction while making reverse movement slower, costlier, politically harder, technically unsafe, procedurally unnamed, or socially illegible. Each step is locally defensible, but the accumulated displacement changes the operating baseline, narrows future options, and eventually creates lock-in, creep, or intervention-stack burden."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An intervention stack can accumulate because additions are individually justified even when removal is procedurally easy.", "slug": "intervention_stack_accretion"}], "residual_id": "r:ratchet_control_and_release_design:b052_a14_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b052_a14_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Additions, exceptions, permissions, obligations, scope items, controls, budget lines, or escalation levels can be introduced through ordinary local decisions, but removal requires extraordinary effort or has no owner. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Additions, exceptions, permissions, obligations, scope items, controls, budget lines, or escalation levels can be introduced through ordinary local decisions, but removal requires extraordinary effort or has no owner."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An intervention stack can accumulate because additions are individually justified even when removal is procedurally easy.", "slug": "intervention_stack_accretion"}], "normalized_requirement": "Local additions are routine while removal is extraordinary or unowned.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Local additions are routine while removal is extraordinary or unowned.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Deviation normalization can compare against recent practice but need not concern one-way accumulation.", "slug": "normalization_of_deviance"}], "residual_id": "r:ratchet_control_and_release_design:b052_a14_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b052_a14_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The current baseline is judged against the immediately prior state rather than the original charter, safety envelope, mission, resource budget, or design intent. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The current baseline is judged against the immediately prior state rather than the original charter, safety envelope, mission, resource budget, or design intent."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Deviation normalization can compare against recent practice but need not concern one-way accumulation.", "slug": "normalization_of_deviance"}], "normalized_requirement": "The current baseline is compared with the prior state rather than original intent.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The current baseline is compared with the prior state rather than original intent.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record permits incremental movement in one direction while mechanically or institutionally resisting reversal.", "role_mapping": "Preserved advance -> ratchet step; dissipated retreat -> blocked reverse motion.", "slug": "ratchet_effect", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b052_a14_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Participants experience pressure in both directions, yet the system preserves advances and dissipates retreats because only one direction has a locking mechanism. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Participants experience pressure in both directions, yet the system preserves advances and dissipates retreats because only one direction has a locking mechanism."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Ratchet Effect", "one_liner": "Direction-asymmetric coupling plus a locking element produces accumulating one-way displacement under bidirectional forcing.", "page_ref": "prime:ratchet_effect", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Preserved advance -> ratchet step; dissipated retreat -> blocked reverse motion.", "slug": "ratchet_effect", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record permits incremental movement in one direction while mechanically or institutionally resisting reversal."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Pressure acts both ways but only one direction preserves advances through a lock.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires individually justified interventions to remain concurrently active until joint cost grows superlinearly.", "role_mapping": "Increment -> intervention; cumulative burden -> stack cost.", "slug": "intervention_stack_accretion", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b052_a14_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The cost of an individual increment is small enough to approve, while the cumulative cost of all increments is large enough to change behavior, capacity, legitimacy, or risk exposure. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The cost of an individual increment is small enough to approve, while the cumulative cost of all increments is large enough to change behavior, capacity, legitimacy, or risk exposure."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Intervention Stack Accretion", "one_liner": "A system accumulates concurrently active interventions, each justified at add-time, whose joint cost grows super-linearly and whose removal requires a distinct named operation.", "page_ref": "prime:intervention_stack_accretion", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Increment -> intervention; cumulative burden -> stack cost.", "slug": "intervention_stack_accretion", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires individually justified interventions to remain concurrently active until joint cost grows superlinearly."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Individually small increments accumulate into large system cost or behavioral change.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires interventions to persist after add-time justification, accumulating with later additions.", "role_mapping": "Temporary measure -> intervention; persistence -> active stack.", "slug": "intervention_stack_accretion", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b052_a14_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The organization has many temporary patches, emergency measures, feature additions, security exceptions, policy carve-outs, or manual compensations that remain active after their triggering condition has ended. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The organization has many temporary patches, emergency measures, feature additions, security exceptions, policy carve-outs, or manual compensations that remain active after their triggering condition has ended."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Intervention Stack Accretion", "one_liner": "A system accumulates concurrently active interventions, each justified at add-time, whose joint cost grows super-linearly and whose removal requires a distinct named operation.", "page_ref": "prime:intervention_stack_accretion", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Temporary measure -> intervention; persistence -> active stack.", "slug": "intervention_stack_accretion", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires interventions to persist after add-time justification, accumulating with later additions."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Temporary patches or emergency measures remain active after their trigger ends.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Stakeholders disagree about whether the current state is normal operation or accumulated drift from a previous baseline.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Each step is locally defensible, but the accumulated displacement changes the operating baseline, narrows future options, and eventually creates lock-in, creep, or intervention-stack burden. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Stakeholders disagree about whether the current state is normal operation or accumulated drift from a previous baseline. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders disagree about whether the current state is normal operation or accumulated drift from a previous baseline.", "Each step is locally defensible, but the accumulated displacement changes the operating baseline, narrows future options, and eventually creates lock-in, creep, or intervention-stack burden."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Stakeholders disagree about whether the current state is normal operation or accumulated drift from a previous baseline."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 52, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-052", "ledger_sha256": "cfa1322919e546c5fa235e4adef471dd958694c4849ba49de0d758ec7887aab2"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Rate Limiting", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:rate_limiting", "slug": "rate_limiting"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 1 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 1}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "An identifiable actor can consume a resource at a temporal rate that exceeds safe, fair, or sustainable bounds.", "explanation_source": {"field": "diagnostic_head", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "An identifiable actor can consume a resource at a temporal rate that exceeds safe, fair, or sustainable bounds."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "This branch preserves the complete remedy-free diagnostic route; goals, feasibility clauses, gates, deployment constraints, and supporting context remain outside the DNF."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "EXT001-C075", "dnf": [["EXT001-U075-O1"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"obligation_id": "EXT001-U075-O1", "predicate": "An identifiable actor can consume a resource faster than a safe, fair, or sustainable rate."}], "predicate": "An identifiable actor can consume a resource faster than a safe, fair, or sustainable rate.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An identifiable actor can consume a resource faster than a safe, fair, or sustainable rate.", "unit_id": "EXT001-U075"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"catalog_exhaustion": "CONDITION_LEVEL", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact record describes an intervention, control, or achieved configuration rather than a pre-existing situation that necessarily entails the atom.", "slug": "rate_limiting"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: An identifiable actor can consume a resource faster than a safe, fair, or sustainable rate.", "slug": "externality"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: An identifiable actor can consume a resource faster than a safe, fair, or sustainable rate.", "slug": "action_bias"}], "residual_id": "EXT001:rate_limiting:C01", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding."}}, "condition_id": "ext001_rate_limiting_a01", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored essence_one_line, compression_statement, components fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: An identifiable actor can consume a resource faster than a safe, fair, or sustainable rate.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["An identifiable actor can consume a resource faster than a safe, fair, or sustainable rate."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact record describes an intervention, control, or achieved configuration rather than a pre-existing situation that necessarily entails the atom.", "slug": "rate_limiting"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: An identifiable actor can consume a resource faster than a safe, fair, or sustainable rate.", "slug": "externality"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: An identifiable actor can consume a resource faster than a safe, fair, or sustainable rate.", "slug": "action_bias"}], "normalized_requirement": "An identifiable actor can consume a resource faster than a safe, fair, or sustainable rate.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "An identifiable actor can consume a resource faster than a safe, fair, or sustainable rate.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Consumption can be measured over a defined time window.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored essence_one_line, compression_statement, components fields; the source file was not modified. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: Consumption can be measured over a defined time window. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Consumption can be measured over a defined time window.", "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored essence_one_line, compression_statement, components fields; the source file was not modified."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "Consumption can be measured over a defined time window."}, {"display_text": "A per-window budget and exhaustion response can be enforced.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored essence_one_line, compression_statement, components fields; the source file was not modified. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: A per-window budget and exhaustion response can be enforced. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A per-window budget and exhaustion response can be enforced.", "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored essence_one_line, compression_statement, components fields; the source file was not modified."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "A per-window budget and exhaustion response can be enforced."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"candidate_ledger_sha256": "96f72d2139077fd57bf795048ebef33b3fd574b20963170080ec916b5b3b92fe", "extension_id": "new-archetypes-extension-001", "ledger_id": "prime-production-v1.2-extension-001", "ledger_sha256": "9644520614744632d1d36da44b1acd77ce432852c6083eb871203521c166efce"}, "base_projection_sha256": "841e0c7f3cb8e8054475ad29a8a14745a416b4fc115559a44878b94292e673ec", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "ca09ed9fe1598ce7072755b530de5553f5ee0a7cd64ae82d9e4a4e2149a37788", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Reachability-Guided Resource Reclamation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:reachability_guided_resource_reclamation", "slug": "reachability_guided_resource_reclamation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Resources accumulate after their useful lifetime because ownership is distributed, references are indirect, and deletion based on age or local inactivity can destroy still-reachable state.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Resources accumulate after their useful lifetime because ownership is distributed, references are indirect, and deletion based on age or local inactivity can destroy still-reachable state."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A garbage collector directly implements reachability and need not coexist with a local workaround.", "slug": "garbage_collection"}], "residual_id": "r:reachability_guided_resource_reclamation:b052_a15_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b052_a15_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Local workarounds do not expose the underlying structural relation. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Local workarounds do not expose the underlying structural relation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A garbage collector directly implements reachability and need not coexist with a local workaround.", "slug": "garbage_collection"}], "normalized_requirement": "Local workarounds do not expose the underlying relation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Local workarounds do not expose the underlying relation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Reachability collection can operate on an explicit validated root model.", "slug": "garbage_collection"}], "residual_id": "r:reachability_guided_resource_reclamation:b052_a15_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b052_a15_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Consequential decisions depend on an assumption that is not yet explicit or validated. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Consequential decisions depend on an assumption that is not yet explicit or validated."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Reachability collection can operate on an explicit validated root model.", "slug": "garbage_collection"}], "normalized_requirement": "A consequential decision depends on an implicit or unvalidated assumption.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A consequential decision depends on an implicit or unvalidated assumption.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "type": "RESIDUAL"}}, "condition_id": "HR1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This condition preserves a load-bearing part of the diagnostic problem that was not captured by a source-condition atom. It remains explicit because omitting it would weaken the sufficient condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": []}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [], "normalized_requirement": "The source conditions omit accumulated resources, root reachability, indirect references, and unsafe age-based deletion.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "SOURCE_GAP", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The source conditions omit accumulated resources, root reachability, indirect references, and unsafe age-based deletion.", "scope": "HEAD", "source_conditions": [], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The target condition recurs across cases or domains rather than appearing as a one-off exception.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The target condition recurs across cases or domains rather than appearing as a one-off exception. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The target condition recurs across cases or domains rather than appearing as a one-off exception."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "The target condition recurs across cases or domains rather than appearing as a one-off exception."}, {"display_text": "The system needs a reusable intervention with monitoring, exception handling, and revision.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: The system needs a reusable intervention with monitoring, exception handling, and revision. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The system needs a reusable intervention with monitoring, exception handling, and revision."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The system needs a reusable intervention with monitoring, exception handling, and revision."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 52, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-052", "ledger_sha256": "cfa1322919e546c5fa235e4adef471dd958694c4849ba49de0d758ec7887aab2"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Realized-Possible Outcome Gap Mapping", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:realized_possible_outcome_gap_mapping", "slug": "realized_possible_outcome_gap_mapping"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A process, program, model, production system, learning path, policy, or strategy produces an observed result, but participants do not know whether that result is excellent, adequate, wasteful, disappointing, or impossible to improve. The missing object is the realized-versus-possible gap: the structured difference between actual outcome and credible outcome possibility. Without that object, teams confuse low performance with hard limits, mistake theoretical maxima for feasible targets, over-credit lucky realization, under-invest in closable losses, or pursue fantasy gains outside the true constraint envelope.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A process, program, model, production system, learning path, policy, or strategy produces an observed result, but participants do not know whether that result is excellent, adequate, wasteful, disappointing, or impossible to improve. The missing object is the realized-versus-possible gap: the structured difference between actual outcome and credible outcome possibility. Without that object, teams confuse low performance with hard limits, mistake theoretical maxima for feasible targets, over-credit lucky realization, under-invest in closable losses, or pursue fantasy gains outside the true constraint envelope."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires both an observed realized set and a constructed possibility set as the comparison objects.", "role_mapping": "Observed result -> realized set; feasible outcomes -> possibility set.", "slug": "realized_vs_possible_outcomes", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b053_a01_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A result is available, but the relevant possible, feasible, theoretical, or attainable outcome set is not explicit. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A result is available, but the relevant possible, feasible, theoretical, or attainable outcome set is not explicit."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Realized vs Possible Outcomes", "one_liner": "The comparison between what a process actually produces and what it could in principle produce, with the gap as the primary object of analysis.", "page_ref": "prime:realized_vs_possible_outcomes", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Observed result -> realized set; feasible outcomes -> possibility set.", "slug": "realized_vs_possible_outcomes", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires both an observed realized set and a constructed possibility set as the comparison objects."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "An observed result exists while the relevant feasible or possible outcome set is not explicit.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record promotes the set difference between realized and possible outcomes as the primary analytical object.", "role_mapping": "Current output -> realized set; latent capacity -> possible set; suspected gap -> unrealized region.", "slug": "realized_vs_possible_outcomes", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b053_a01_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: There is a suspected gap between current output and latent capacity, theoretical maximum, best attainable practice, or reachable alternatives. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["There is a suspected gap between current output and latent capacity, theoretical maximum, best attainable practice, or reachable alternatives."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Realized vs Possible Outcomes", "one_liner": "The comparison between what a process actually produces and what it could in principle produce, with the gap as the primary object of analysis.", "page_ref": "prime:realized_vs_possible_outcomes", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Current output -> realized set; latent capacity -> possible set; suspected gap -> unrealized region.", "slug": "realized_vs_possible_outcomes", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record promotes the set difference between realized and possible outcomes as the primary analytical object."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A gap is suspected between current output and latent capacity, attainable practice, or reachable alternatives.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid realized-versus-possible analysis explicitly constructs and defends its possibility set.", "slug": "realized_vs_possible_outcomes"}], "residual_id": "r:realized_possible_outcome_gap_mapping:b053_a01_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b053_a01_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The outcome standard is being set by aspiration, comparison, memory, or politics rather than by a defensible possibility envelope. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The outcome standard is being set by aspiration, comparison, memory, or politics rather than by a defensible possibility envelope."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid realized-versus-possible analysis explicitly constructs and defends its possibility set.", "slug": "realized_vs_possible_outcomes"}], "normalized_requirement": "The outcome standard comes from aspiration, comparison, memory, or politics rather than a defensible possibility envelope.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The outcome standard comes from aspiration, comparison, memory, or politics rather than a defensible possibility envelope.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact gap can already be decomposed by shape and cause.", "slug": "realized_vs_possible_outcomes"}], "residual_id": "r:realized_possible_outcome_gap_mapping:b053_a01_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b053_a01_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Losses, bottlenecks, missed options, exclusions, or unrealized capacities need to be separated instead of lumped into one deficit. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Losses, bottlenecks, missed options, exclusions, or unrealized capacities need to be separated instead of lumped into one deficit."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact gap can already be decomposed by shape and cause.", "slug": "realized_vs_possible_outcomes"}], "normalized_requirement": "Losses, bottlenecks, exclusions, missed options, and unrealized capacities are lumped into one deficit.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Losses, bottlenecks, exclusions, missed options, and unrealized capacities are lumped into one deficit.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P091-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve a process, realized output, and more than one internal locus.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A process carries or produces realized output through multiple points.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve possible output loss without requiring loss at every point.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Realized output can be lost or disappear within the process.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "A candidate must preserve multiple potential loss loci rather than one bottleneck.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "At least two distinct process points can contribute to realized-output loss.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires potential output loss across multiple stages.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The multiple loss points are process stages.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires potential output loss across multiple channels.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The multiple loss points are channels.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires potential output loss across multiple transformations.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The multiple loss points are transformations.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A process can lose realized output at multiple points across one listed process structure.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "realized output can be lost at multiple process points", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P091-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime can compare one realized point with one feasible set in a single-stage process.", "slug": "realized_vs_possible_outcomes"}], "residual_id": "r:realized_possible_outcome_gap_mapping:b053_a01_c7", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b053_a01_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A process spans stages, channels, or transformations where realized output can disappear at multiple points. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A process spans stages, channels, or transformations where realized output can disappear at multiple points."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Removing all but one loss point destroys the exact record's ordered surveillance pyramid, whose compounding attenuation is constitutively distributed across multiple stages.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Outbreak Underascertainment", "one_liner": "The surveillance failure in which recorded case counts fall systematically below the true count because a multi-stage detection pipeline — symptom expression, care-seeking, testing, confirmation, reporting — filters cases with biased attenuation at each layer.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:outbreak_underascertainment", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "outbreak_underascertainment"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "outbreak_underascertainment", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P091-C15-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record universally entails a complete stage branch: a process carries realizable output through multiple stages, and output can be lost at more than one of them."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A multistage process can lose realized output at several points.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The possibility set is constructed from process constraints, so changing the defensible constraint model changes the gap around the same realized set.", "role_mapping": "Baseline -> possibility set; realized outcome -> fixed realized set.", "slug": "realized_vs_possible_outcomes", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b053_a01_c8", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The same realized outcome can be interpreted differently under different feasible baselines or constraint assumptions. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The same realized outcome can be interpreted differently under different feasible baselines or constraint assumptions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Realized vs Possible Outcomes", "one_liner": "The comparison between what a process actually produces and what it could in principle produce, with the gap as the primary object of analysis.", "page_ref": "prime:realized_vs_possible_outcomes", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Baseline -> possibility set; realized outcome -> fixed realized set.", "slug": "realized_vs_possible_outcomes", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The possibility set is constructed from process constraints, so changing the defensible constraint model changes the gap around the same realized set."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The same realized outcome changes interpretation under different feasible baselines or constraint assumptions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [8], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Stakeholders debate whether a process is underperforming, overperforming, adequate, wasteful, or constrained.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A process, program, model, production system, learning path, policy, or strategy produces an observed result, but participants do not know whether that result is excellent, adequate, wasteful, disappointing, or impossible to improve. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Stakeholders debate whether a process is underperforming, overperforming, adequate, wasteful, or constrained. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders debate whether a process is underperforming, overperforming, adequate, wasteful, or constrained.", "A process, program, model, production system, learning path, policy, or strategy produces an observed result, but participants do not know whether that result is excellent, adequate, wasteful, disappointing, or impossible to improve."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "Stakeholders debate whether a process is underperforming, overperforming, adequate, wasteful, or constrained."}, {"display_text": "Improvement work needs to distinguish closable gap from irreducible limit, measurement error, intentional tradeoff, and unchosen opportunity.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Without that object, teams confuse low performance with hard limits, mistake theoretical maxima for feasible targets, over-credit lucky realization, under-invest in closable losses, or pursue fantasy gains outside the true constraint envelope. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: Improvement work needs to distinguish closable gap from irreducible limit, measurement error, intentional tradeoff, and unchosen opportunity. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Improvement work needs to distinguish closable gap from irreducible limit, measurement error, intentional tradeoff, and unchosen opportunity.", "Without that object, teams confuse low performance with hard limits, mistake theoretical maxima for feasible targets, over-credit lucky realization, under-invest in closable losses, or pursue fantasy gains outside the true constraint envelope."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Improvement work needs to distinguish closable gap from irreducible limit, measurement error, intentional tradeoff, and unchosen opportunity."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 53, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-053", "ledger_sha256": "c05f9cf1b35e77ac89d848372294a3772e220b983e4ad46fd6172c2fbf9c5418"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Rebound-Aware Efficiency Governance", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:rebound_aware_efficiency_governance", "slug": "rebound_aware_efficiency_governance"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Decision-makers optimize resource intensity per unit of service while treating service demand, capacity expansion, substitution, indirect spending, and boundary leakage as exogenous. The efficiency gain lowers effective cost or friction, alters behavior and investment, and can cause total resource use to diverge from the engineering forecast.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Decision-makers optimize resource intensity per unit of service while treating service demand, capacity expansion, substitution, indirect spending, and boundary leakage as exogenous. The efficiency gain lowers effective cost or friction, alters behavior and investment, and can cause total resource use to diverge from the engineering forecast."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record begins with an efficiency gain that lowers input intensity for the same unit of service.", "role_mapping": "Resource input -> conserved input; service -> activity unit; lower intensity -> efficiency gain.", "slug": "efficiency_rebound", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b053_a02_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A proposed technology, process, design, or policy materially lowers resource input per unit of service. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A proposed technology, process, design, or policy materially lowers resource input per unit of service."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Efficiency Rebound", "one_liner": "An efficiency gain lowers the effective cost per unit of an activity, inducing enough additional demand to offset part or all of the resource saving expected at fixed activity volume.", "page_ref": "prime:efficiency_rebound", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Resource input -> conserved input; service -> activity unit; lower intensity -> efficiency gain.", "slug": "efficiency_rebound", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record begins with an efficiency gain that lowers input intensity for the same unit of service."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A technology or policy materially lowers resource input per service unit.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The mandatory mechanism is a lower money, time, effort, or risk cost per service unit that can alter behavior.", "role_mapping": "Visible cost -> effective-cost channel; users -> demand side.", "slug": "efficiency_rebound", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b053_a02_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The lower unit cost, time, effort, latency, or inconvenience is visible to users, producers, or planners. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The lower unit cost, time, effort, latency, or inconvenience is visible to users, producers, or planners."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Efficiency Rebound", "one_liner": "An efficiency gain lowers the effective cost per unit of an activity, inducing enough additional demand to offset part or all of the resource saving expected at fixed activity volume.", "page_ref": "prime:efficiency_rebound", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Visible cost -> effective-cost channel; users -> demand side.", "slug": "efficiency_rebound", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The mandatory mechanism is a lower money, time, effort, or risk cost per service unit that can alter behavior."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The lower effective unit cost or friction is visible to users, producers, or planners.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires expandable activity whose demand responds to the cost reduction.", "role_mapping": "Expandable demand -> activity response; latent use -> previously priced-out service.", "slug": "efficiency_rebound", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b053_a02_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Demand is elastic, latent, capacity-constrained, or capable of expanding through quality, size, frequency, reach, or complementary use. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Demand is elastic, latent, capacity-constrained, or capable of expanding through quality, size, frequency, reach, or complementary use."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Efficiency Rebound", "one_liner": "An efficiency gain lowers the effective cost per unit of an activity, inducing enough additional demand to offset part or all of the resource saving expected at fixed activity volume.", "page_ref": "prime:efficiency_rebound", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Expandable demand -> activity response; latent use -> previously priced-out service.", "slug": "efficiency_rebound", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires expandable activity whose demand responds to the cost reduction."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Demand is elastic, latent, capacity-constrained, or otherwise expandable.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Rebound can occur through direct increased service consumption without redeployment of a separately released resource.", "slug": "efficiency_rebound"}], "residual_id": "r:rebound_aware_efficiency_governance:b053_a02_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b053_a02_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Released money, capacity, or infrastructure is likely to be redeployed unless its disposition is governed. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Released money, capacity, or infrastructure is likely to be redeployed unless its disposition is governed."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Rebound can occur through direct increased service consumption without redeployment of a separately released resource.", "slug": "efficiency_rebound"}], "normalized_requirement": "Released money, capacity, or infrastructure will be redeployed unless governed.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Released money, capacity, or infrastructure will be redeployed unless governed.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The intended success criterion includes absolute resource, emissions, material, water, land, energy, or capacity reduction rather than intensity alone.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Decision-makers optimize resource intensity per unit of service while treating service demand, capacity expansion, substitution, indirect spending, and boundary leakage as exogenous. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: The intended success criterion includes absolute resource, emissions, material, water, land, energy, or capacity reduction rather than intensity alone. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The intended success criterion includes absolute resource, emissions, material, water, land, energy, or capacity reduction rather than intensity alone.", "Decision-makers optimize resource intensity per unit of service while treating service demand, capacity expansion, substitution, indirect spending, and boundary leakage as exogenous."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The intended success criterion includes absolute resource, emissions, material, water, land, energy, or capacity reduction rather than intensity alone."}, {"display_text": "Externalities or shared-resource limits make total use consequential beyond the immediate user.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The efficiency gain lowers effective cost or friction, alters behavior and investment, and can cause total resource use to diverge from the engineering forecast. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Externalities or shared-resource limits make total use consequential beyond the immediate user. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Externalities or shared-resource limits make total use consequential beyond the immediate user.", "The efficiency gain lowers effective cost or friction, alters behavior and investment, and can cause total resource use to diverge from the engineering forecast."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Externalities or shared-resource limits make total use consequential beyond the immediate user."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 53, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-053", "ledger_sha256": "c05f9cf1b35e77ac89d848372294a3772e220b983e4ad46fd6172c2fbf9c5418"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Receptive-Field Tiling Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:receptive_field_tiling_design", "slug": "receptive_field_tiling_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system must detect, interpret, serve, or respond across a large input space, but a single global responder is too blunt, overloaded, slow, expensive, or insensitive. Without a deliberate field architecture, some regions receive no capable responder, edge cases fall between units, local units become overbroad generalists, or separate responders produce incompatible outputs.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system must detect, interpret, serve, or respond across a large input space, but a single global responder is too blunt, overloaded, slow, expensive, or insensitive. Without a deliberate field architecture, some regions receive no capable responder, edge cases fall between units, local units become overbroad generalists, or separate responders produce incompatible outputs."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record covers a large input space by composing many processing units with bounded local jurisdictions.", "role_mapping": "Input territory -> input space; responder -> bounded unit.", "slug": "receptive_field", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b053_a03_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The relevant input, territory, population, feature set, or problem space is larger than any one responder can sense or handle at useful resolution. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The relevant input, territory, population, feature set, or problem space is larger than any one responder can sense or handle at useful resolution."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Receptive Field", "one_liner": "A processing unit responds only to inputs falling inside a bounded region of an input space, so a large system covers its input by tiling many such local jurisdictions.", "page_ref": "prime:receptive_field", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Input territory -> input space; responder -> bounded unit.", "slug": "receptive_field", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record covers a large input space by composing many processing units with bounded local jurisdictions."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The input space exceeds any one responder's useful sensing or handling resolution.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P092-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a larger response space with distinct local regions and a responder-capability role.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A system serves, senses, interprets, or responds across multiple local regions of a larger space.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail cross-region heterogeneity rather than identical requirements applied everywhere.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The capability or operating condition required for an adequate response differs between local regions.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve necessity of local differentiation, not optional customization of an otherwise adequate global response.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The differing local capabilities are required by the regions rather than merely preferred.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "Local regions of an input or service space require heterogeneous responder capabilities or operating conditions.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "local regions require heterogeneous responder capabilities", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P092-C01-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Receptive fields can tile a homogeneous space with identical unit selectivity and rules.", "slug": "receptive_field"}], "residual_id": "r:receptive_field_tiling_design:b053_a03_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b053_a03_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Local regions of the space require different expertise, thresholds, response rules, service norms, or sensing apparatus. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Local regions of the space require different expertise, thresholds, response rules, service norms, or sensing apparatus."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Receptive fields can tile a homogeneous space with identical unit selectivity and rules.", "slug": "receptive_field"}], "normalized_requirement": "Local regions require different expertise, thresholds, rules, norms, or apparatus.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Local regions require different expertise, thresholds, rules, norms, or apparatus.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A receptive-field tiling can provide complete controlled overlap with no likely coverage failure.", "slug": "receptive_field"}], "residual_id": "r:receptive_field_tiling_design:b053_a03_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b053_a03_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Coverage failure is likely at boundaries, sparse regions, rare cases, high-variance subspaces, or areas with weak observability. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Coverage failure is likely at boundaries, sparse regions, rare cases, high-variance subspaces, or areas with weak observability."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A receptive-field tiling can provide complete controlled overlap with no likely coverage failure.", "slug": "receptive_field"}], "normalized_requirement": "Coverage failures are likely at boundaries, sparse regions, rare cases, or weakly observable areas.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Coverage failures are likely at boundaries, sparse regions, rare cases, or weakly observable areas.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires multiple processing units, each responding only within a bounded region.", "role_mapping": "Responders -> processing units; bounded scope -> field extent.", "slug": "receptive_field", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b053_a03_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The system can assign or train multiple responders, sensors, teams, filters, reviewers, or modules with bounded local scope. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The system can assign or train multiple responders, sensors, teams, filters, reviewers, or modules with bounded local scope."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Receptive Field", "one_liner": "A processing unit responds only to inputs falling inside a bounded region of an input space, so a large system covers its input by tiling many such local jurisdictions.", "page_ref": "prime:receptive_field", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Responders -> processing units; bounded scope -> field extent.", "slug": "receptive_field", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires multiple processing units, each responding only within a bounded region."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Multiple responders or modules can be assigned bounded local scope.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record supplies a coverage map from input location to the local unit or units that respond.", "role_mapping": "Mapped input -> field coordinate; routed unit -> responding jurisdiction.", "slug": "receptive_field", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b053_a03_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Inputs can be mapped, indexed, clustered, routed, localized, or otherwise placed within a field structure. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Inputs can be mapped, indexed, clustered, routed, localized, or otherwise placed within a field structure."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Receptive Field", "one_liner": "A processing unit responds only to inputs falling inside a bounded region of an input space, so a large system covers its input by tiling many such local jurisdictions.", "page_ref": "prime:receptive_field", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Mapped input -> field coordinate; routed unit -> responding jurisdiction.", "slug": "receptive_field", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record supplies a coverage map from input location to the local unit or units that respond."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Inputs can be located and routed within a field structure.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A field tiling can remain correctly calibrated under a stationary input distribution.", "slug": "receptive_field"}], "residual_id": "r:receptive_field_tiling_design:b053_a03_c8", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b053_a03_c8", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Field boundaries need periodic retuning because the input distribution, territory, demand pattern, or adversary behavior changes over time. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Field boundaries need periodic retuning because the input distribution, territory, demand pattern, or adversary behavior changes over time."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A field tiling can remain correctly calibrated under a stationary input distribution.", "slug": "receptive_field"}], "normalized_requirement": "Field boundaries require periodic retuning as the input distribution or adversary changes.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Field boundaries require periodic retuning as the input distribution or adversary changes.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [8], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Integration across local responses matters because downstream users need a coherent global picture, decision, or service experience.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Local boundedness gives sensitivity, speed, and specialization, but global coverage requires enough overlap, calibration, and integration to prevent local jurisdictions from becoming blind, parochial, inconsistent, or mutually conflicting. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: Integration across local responses matters because downstream users need a coherent global picture, decision, or service experience. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Integration across local responses matters because downstream users need a coherent global picture, decision, or service experience.", "Local boundedness gives sensitivity, speed, and specialization, but global coverage requires enough overlap, calibration, and integration to prevent local jurisdictions from becoming blind, parochial, inconsistent, or mutually conflicting."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Integration across local responses matters because downstream users need a coherent global picture, decision, or service experience."}, {"display_text": "The cost of a blind spot, duplicate response, boundary conflict, or overbroad field is high enough to justify explicit tiling and calibration.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Local boundedness gives sensitivity, speed, and specialization, but global coverage requires enough overlap, calibration, and integration to prevent local jurisdictions from becoming blind, parochial, inconsistent, or mutually conflicting. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: The cost of a blind spot, duplicate response, boundary conflict, or overbroad field is high enough to justify explicit tiling and calibration. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The cost of a blind spot, duplicate response, boundary conflict, or overbroad field is high enough to justify explicit tiling and calibration.", "Local boundedness gives sensitivity, speed, and specialization, but global coverage requires enough overlap, calibration, and integration to prevent local jurisdictions from becoming blind, parochial, inconsistent, or mutually conflicting."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The cost of a blind spot, duplicate response, boundary conflict, or overbroad field is high enough to justify explicit tiling and calibration."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 53, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-053", "ledger_sha256": "c05f9cf1b35e77ac89d848372294a3772e220b983e4ad46fd6172c2fbf9c5418"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Receptivity-Window Intervention Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:receptivity_window_intervention_design", "slug": "receptivity_window_intervention_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system needs to be influenced, taught, healed, seeded, reconfigured, or stabilized, but the receiving substrate is only intermittently receptive. Acting before the window wastes effort or provokes resistance; acting after closure produces little uptake or causes harm; acting without preparation misses the narrow opening.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system needs to be influenced, taught, healed, seeded, reconfigured, or stabilized, but the receiving substrate is only intermittently receptive. Acting before the window wastes effort or provokes resistance; acting after closure produces little uptake or causes harm; acting without preparation misses the narrow opening."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires substrate receptivity to a fixed intervention class to rise during one bounded internal-state interval.", "role_mapping": "Substrate state -> permissive condition; response variation -> window interior versus exterior.", "slug": "readiness_window", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b053_a04_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The receiving substrate changes state over time and its response to the same intervention varies sharply by state. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The receiving substrate changes state over time and its response to the same intervention varies sharply by state."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Readiness Window", "one_liner": "A receptive substrate enters a bounded opening-interior-closing interval during which a class of interventions can take hold.", "page_ref": "prime:readiness_window", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Substrate state -> permissive condition; response variation -> window interior versus exterior.", "slug": "readiness_window", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires substrate receptivity to a fixed intervention class to rise during one bounded internal-state interval."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A changing substrate responds sharply differently to the same intervention by state.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record includes an opening edge, elevated interior, and closing edge determined by substrate state.", "role_mapping": "Signs -> edge indicators; interval -> readiness window.", "slug": "readiness_window", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b053_a04_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: There are observable or inferable signs that the substrate is approaching, entering, occupying, or leaving a receptive interval. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["There are observable or inferable signs that the substrate is approaching, entering, occupying, or leaving a receptive interval."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Readiness Window", "one_liner": "A receptive substrate enters a bounded opening-interior-closing interval during which a class of interventions can take hold.", "page_ref": "prime:readiness_window", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Signs -> edge indicators; interval -> readiness window.", "slug": "readiness_window", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record includes an opening edge, elevated interior, and closing edge determined by substrate state."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Signs indicate approach, entry, occupancy, or exit from a receptive interval.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A bounded closing edge is mandatory: receptive capacity is consumed, the substrate matures past it, or the opportunity dissipates.", "role_mapping": "Closing boundary -> closing edge; interval -> elevated-receptivity interior.", "slug": "readiness_window", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b053_a04_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The interval has a meaningful closing boundary, refractory state, fatigue effect, saturation effect, or lock-in risk. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The interval has a meaningful closing boundary, refractory state, fatigue effect, saturation effect, or lock-in risk."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Readiness Window", "one_liner": "A receptive substrate enters a bounded opening-interior-closing interval during which a class of interventions can take hold.", "page_ref": "prime:readiness_window", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Closing boundary -> closing edge; interval -> elevated-receptivity interior.", "slug": "readiness_window", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A bounded closing edge is mandatory: receptive capacity is consumed, the substrate matures past it, or the opportunity dissipates."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The interval has a meaningful closing boundary, refractory state, fatigue, saturation, or lock-in risk.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record states that intervention success is jointly determined by merit and release timing relative to substrate receptivity.", "role_mapping": "Timing/form -> intervention release; capacity -> receptive state.", "slug": "readiness_window", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b053_a04_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A useful change requires a match between intervention strength, timing, form, and substrate capacity. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A useful change requires a match between intervention strength, timing, form, and substrate capacity."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Readiness Window", "one_liner": "A receptive substrate enters a bounded opening-interior-closing interval during which a class of interventions can take hold.", "page_ref": "prime:readiness_window", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Timing/form -> intervention release; capacity -> receptive state.", "slug": "readiness_window", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record states that intervention success is jointly determined by merit and release timing relative to substrate receptivity."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Useful change depends jointly on intervention timing, form, strength, and substrate capacity.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The intervention class must be prepared before the window appears because preparation cannot be improvised inside the interval.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Acting before the window wastes effort or provokes resistance; acting after closure produces little uptake or causes harm; acting without preparation misses the narrow opening. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: The intervention class must be prepared before the window appears because preparation cannot be improvised inside the interval. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The intervention class must be prepared before the window appears because preparation cannot be improvised inside the interval.", "Acting before the window wastes effort or provokes resistance; acting after closure produces little uptake or causes harm; acting without preparation misses the narrow opening."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "The intervention class must be prepared before the window appears because preparation cannot be improvised inside the interval."}, {"display_text": "The cost of false positives, missed windows, or mistimed action is high enough to justify explicit window design.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Receptive intervals create leverage, but they also create timing pressure: the designer must prepare early enough to be ready, wait long enough to avoid premature action, act fast enough before closure, and stop soon enough to avoid forcing a nonreceptive substrate. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: The cost of false positives, missed windows, or mistimed action is high enough to justify explicit window design. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The cost of false positives, missed windows, or mistimed action is high enough to justify explicit window design.", "Receptive intervals create leverage, but they also create timing pressure: the designer must prepare early enough to be ready, wait long enough to avoid premature action, act fast enough before closure, and stop soon enough to avoid forcing a nonreceptive substrate."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The cost of false positives, missed windows, or mistimed action is high enough to justify explicit window design."}, {"display_text": "Post-window consolidation matters because initial uptake can decay, reverse, or fail to embed.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Acting before the window wastes effort or provokes resistance; acting after closure produces little uptake or causes harm; acting without preparation misses the narrow opening. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: Post-window consolidation matters because initial uptake can decay, reverse, or fail to embed. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Post-window consolidation matters because initial uptake can decay, reverse, or fail to embed.", "Acting before the window wastes effort or provokes resistance; acting after closure produces little uptake or causes harm; acting without preparation misses the narrow opening."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "Post-window consolidation matters because initial uptake can decay, reverse, or fail to embed."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 53, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-053", "ledger_sha256": "c05f9cf1b35e77ac89d848372294a3772e220b983e4ad46fd6172c2fbf9c5418"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Recipient Knowledge-State Calibration", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:recipient_knowledge_state_calibration", "slug": "recipient_knowledge_state_calibration"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 2, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "An expert, insider, designer, instructor, clinician, analyst, or institution must communicate or design for people who lack the same background knowledge, but the expert's own knowledge makes the missing recipient perspective hard to simulate. As a result, explanations, warnings, interfaces, instructions, curricula, and decisions skip prerequisites, overuse unexplained terms, or assume inferences the recipient cannot yet make.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "An expert, insider, designer, instructor, clinician, analyst, or institution must communicate or design for people who lack the same background knowledge, but the expert's own knowledge makes the missing recipient perspective hard to simulate. As a result, explanations, warnings, interfaces, instructions, curricula, and decisions skip prerequisites, overuse unexplained terms, or assume inferences the recipient cannot yet make."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Calibration can be correct and communication successful.", "slug": "calibration"}], "residual_id": "r:recipient_knowledge_state_calibration:b053_a05_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b053_a05_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A team has repeated misunderstandings even though the expert source insists that the information was already provided. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A team has repeated misunderstandings even though the expert source insists that the information was already provided."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Calibration can be correct and communication successful.", "slug": "calibration"}], "normalized_requirement": "Misunderstandings recur although the expert insists the information was supplied.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Misunderstandings recur although the expert insists the information was supplied.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P092-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a recipient-facing arrangement and a background-prerequisite role.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A design, policy, process, or equivalent recipient-facing arrangement depends on background knowledge for correct use or interpretation.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail a presupposition or dependency on recipient background, not merely advanced content that is fully explained.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The arrangement assumes that recipients possess the prerequisite background.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the recipient-side absence or mismatch, rather than a prerequisite that recipients already possess.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The intended recipients do not share the assumed background.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "A recipient-facing design, policy, or process presupposes background knowledge that its recipients do not share.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "recipient-facing artifact assumes unavailable recipient background", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P092-C02-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Implicit knowledge is unarticulated knowledge in the expert, not necessarily a missing background model in the recipient.", "slug": "implicit_knowledge"}], "residual_id": "r:recipient_knowledge_state_calibration:b053_a05_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b053_a05_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A design, policy, or process assumes background concepts, vocabulary, context, or causal models that recipients do not share. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A design, policy, or process assumes background concepts, vocabulary, context, or causal models that recipients do not share."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "The unguarded too-hidden expert-control and sensory-readiness cases fail the source, but the single domain restriction to prerequisite background excludes them while preserving the candidate's existing schedule-readiness relation.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Progressive-Disclosure Failure", "one_liner": "Diagnose an interface's usability breakdowns as a single mistuning between its staging schedule and the readiness of the users and tasks it actually meets, read off by whether too much is hidden or too much exposed.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:progressive_disclosure_failure", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1", "O2", "O3"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "readiness_gap_is_prerequisite_background_knowledge", "predicate": "The staged interface exceeds recipients’ readiness specifically in prerequisite background knowledge.", "rationale": "The retained relation preserves all load-bearing roles, direction, modality, and a complete DNF branch under universal entailment; any qualifier is one anchored atomic restriction."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "progressive_disclosure_failure"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "readiness_gap_is_prerequisite_background_knowledge"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "progressive_disclosure_failure", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P092-C02-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record already supplies a recipient-facing disclosure schedule designed against assumed user readiness and an actual readiness mismatch. One anchored domain restriction binds that existing readiness dimension to prerequisite background knowledge; it neither adds roles nor restates the whole source head."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A design assumes concepts, vocabulary, context, or causal models recipients do not share.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P092-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve distinct expert and recipient roles with knowledge relevant to the task or communication.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An expert and a recipient occupy different relevant knowledge states.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail a directional knowledge gap rather than two equally informed parties.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The recipient is less knowledgeable than the expert in the relevant domain.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve recipient-calibrated estimation, not an estimate made only from the expert's own operating conditions.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The expert estimates a task or communication demand as it applies to the recipient.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the estimation requirement rather than an optional act of perspective taking.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The expert is required to make the recipient-calibrated estimate.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "An expert must estimate recipient-facing task demands from the perspective of a less knowledgeable recipient.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "expert estimates task demands for a less knowledgeable recipient", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P092-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Calibration can compare a prediction with outcome without any expert-recipient knowledge gap.", "slug": "calibration"}], "residual_id": "r:recipient_knowledge_state_calibration:b053_a05_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b053_a05_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: An expert estimates task difficulty, learning time, risk salience, or required detail for a less knowledgeable recipient. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["An expert estimates task difficulty, learning time, risk salience, or required detail for a less knowledgeable recipient."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A valid cognitive walkthrough cannot omit the expert-to-simulated-novice perspective shift or its required per-step estimates; omitting either changes it into a different usability method.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Cognitive Walkthrough", "one_liner": "A usability-evaluation method in which an expert evaluator steps through a bounded task as a first-time user, asking four action-cycle questions at each step, so learnability breakdowns are localized to a specific step and broken link rather than yielding a holistic rating.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:cognitive_walkthrough", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "cognitive_walkthrough"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "cognitive_walkthrough", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P092-C03-U1", "why_it_fits": "The candidate independently instantiates the source relation: an expert is required by the method to adopt a first-time user's lesser knowledge state and estimate task demands through four per-step questions. It is not merely a remedy for an otherwise absent relation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "An expert must estimate difficulty, learning time, salience, or detail for a less knowledgeable recipient.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A specialist must explain, teach, warn, onboard, document, or obtain consent from non-specialists or new learners.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: A specialist must explain, teach, warn, onboard, document, or obtain consent from non-specialists or new learners. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A specialist must explain, teach, warn, onboard, document, or obtain consent from non-specialists or new learners."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "A specialist must explain, teach, warn, onboard, document, or obtain consent from non-specialists or new learners."}, {"display_text": "Users, patients, students, operators, citizens, or stakeholders must act on information produced by an expert group.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: Users, patients, students, operators, citizens, or stakeholders must act on information produced by an expert group. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Users, patients, students, operators, citizens, or stakeholders must act on information produced by an expert group."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Users, patients, students, operators, citizens, or stakeholders must act on information produced by an expert group."}, {"display_text": "High-stakes decisions require evidence that recipients understand enough to choose, comply, question, or safely act.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "As a result, explanations, warnings, interfaces, instructions, curricula, and decisions skip prerequisites, overuse unexplained terms, or assume inferences the recipient cannot yet make. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: High-stakes decisions require evidence that recipients understand enough to choose, comply, question, or safely act. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["High-stakes decisions require evidence that recipients understand enough to choose, comply, question, or safely act.", "As a result, explanations, warnings, interfaces, instructions, curricula, and decisions skip prerequisites, overuse unexplained terms, or assume inferences the recipient cannot yet make."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "High-stakes decisions require evidence that recipients understand enough to choose, comply, question, or safely act."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 53, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-053", "ledger_sha256": "c05f9cf1b35e77ac89d848372294a3772e220b983e4ad46fd6172c2fbf9c5418"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Reciprocity Protocol Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:reciprocity_protocol_design", "slug": "reciprocity_protocol_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is ungoverned mutuality. Parties exchange value, help, labor, access, or trust without a shared answer to basic questions: who is reciprocating with whom, what counts as contribution, when return is due, how imbalance is detected, and what happens when one party gives or takes too much.\n\nWithout this structure, cooperation tends to oscillate between two bad states. In one state, everyone relies on vague goodwill until contributors burn out or quietly withdraw. In the other, people impose rigid accounting that destroys trust and generosity. The archetype holds a middle path: enough structure to prevent exploitation, enough flexibility to preserve relationship and dignity.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Parties exchange help, resources, information, access, concessions, or benefits without a shared structure for mutuality, so cooperation can drift into free-riding, hidden burden, resentment, opportunism, or exploitation."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires durable interaction in which current contributions are conditioned on and expected to be returned through future action.", "role_mapping": "Parties -> participants; contribution -> give action; ongoing relation -> repeated interaction.", "slug": "reciprocity", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b053_a06_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Cooperation depends on parties giving, helping, sharing, or accommodating one another over time. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Cooperation depends on parties giving, helping, sharing, or accommodating one another over time."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Reciprocity", "one_liner": "Mutual exchange.", "page_ref": "prime:reciprocity", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Parties -> participants; contribution -> give action; ongoing relation -> repeated interaction.", "slug": "reciprocity", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires durable interaction in which current contributions are conditioned on and expected to be returned through future action."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Ongoing cooperation depends on parties giving, helping, sharing, or accommodating over time.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A reciprocity protocol can state an immediate, explicit, unambiguous return.", "slug": "reciprocity"}], "residual_id": "r:reciprocity_protocol_design:b053_a06_c2", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b053_a06_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The return expected from each party is implicit, ambiguous, delayed, or socially sensitive. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The return expected from each party is implicit, ambiguous, delayed, or socially sensitive."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A reciprocity protocol can state an immediate, explicit, unambiguous return.", "slug": "reciprocity"}], "normalized_requirement": "The expected return is implicit, ambiguous, delayed, or socially sensitive.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The expected return is implicit, ambiguous, delayed, or socially sensitive.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P092-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a contribution and an audience or counterparty for whom its history or significance matters.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A party contributes something whose contribution must remain legible to relevant participants or counterparties.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail impaired practical access, not merely an operation that takes some ordinary effort.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The selected contribution-accounting operation is difficult to perform.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires weak visibility or observability of the contribution.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The contribution is difficult to see.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires weak comparability across contributions.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The contribution is difficult to compare with other contributions.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires impaired recognition or attribution of the contribution.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The contribution is difficult to recognize or credit.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires weak retention or durable recording of the contribution.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The contribution is difficult to remember over time.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A contribution is difficult for relevant parties to see, compare, recognize, or remember.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "contributions are hard to observe, compare, recognize, or retain", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P092-C04-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Reciprocal actions can be public, commensurable, and durably recorded.", "slug": "reciprocity"}], "residual_id": "r:reciprocity_protocol_design:b053_a06_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b053_a06_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Contributions are hard to see, compare, recognize, or remember. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Contributions are hard to see, compare, recognize, or remember."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Reciprocal actions can be public, commensurable, and durably recorded.", "slug": "reciprocity"}], "normalized_requirement": "Contributions are difficult to see, compare, recognize, or remember.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Contributions are difficult to see, compare, recognize, or remember.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A functioning reciprocity relation can have balanced contribution and no free rider.", "slug": "reciprocity"}], "residual_id": "r:reciprocity_protocol_design:b053_a06_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b053_a06_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Some participants repeatedly benefit without contributing, while others carry invisible or uncompensated burden. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Some participants repeatedly benefit without contributing, while others carry invisible or uncompensated burden."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A functioning reciprocity relation can have balanced contribution and no free rider.", "slug": "reciprocity"}], "normalized_requirement": "Some participants repeatedly benefit without contributing while others carry hidden burden.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Some participants repeatedly benefit without contributing while others carry hidden burden.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires repeated or durable interaction and an expectation of return over time.", "role_mapping": "Ongoing membership -> durable relationship; exchange -> reciprocal action.", "slug": "reciprocity", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b053_a06_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The exchange is not merely a one-time market transaction; it is embedded in ongoing relationship, membership, partnership, or community governance. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The exchange is not merely a one-time market transaction; it is embedded in ongoing relationship, membership, partnership, or community governance."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Reciprocity", "one_liner": "Mutual exchange.", "page_ref": "prime:reciprocity", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Ongoing membership -> durable relationship; exchange -> reciprocal action.", "slug": "reciprocity", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires repeated or durable interaction and an expectation of return over time."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The exchange is embedded in an ongoing relationship rather than a one-time transaction.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The relation needs trust and flexibility, but also needs guardrails against free-riding, status capture, coercion, or extraction.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when cooperation depends on mutual exchange over time and the relationship could fail through free-riding, hidden burden, unrecognized contribution, opportunistic nonreturn, or extractive demands. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: The relation needs trust and flexibility, but also needs guardrails against free-riding, status capture, coercion, or extraction. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The relation needs trust and flexibility, but also needs guardrails against free-riding, status capture, coercion, or extraction.", "Use this archetype when cooperation depends on mutual exchange over time and the relationship could fail through free-riding, hidden burden, unrecognized contribution, opportunistic nonreturn, or extractive demands."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The relation needs trust and flexibility, but also needs guardrails against free-riding, status capture, coercion, or extraction."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 53, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-053", "ledger_sha256": "c05f9cf1b35e77ac89d848372294a3772e220b983e4ad46fd6172c2fbf9c5418"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Reconciliation After Drift", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:reconciliation_after_drift", "slug": "reconciliation_after_drift"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 2 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 2}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is redundant or distributed representation without guaranteed convergence. A system has gained speed, resilience, specialization, or local ownership by allowing more than one representation of reality. Over time, updates are delayed, duplicated, lost, interpreted differently, or applied in a different order. The result is not just “bad data”; it is competing operational truths.\n\nThis is especially risky when each representation may be partly valid. A bank statement may be current while the ledger contains pending internal adjustments. A branch may include a valid local correction while another branch includes a global update. A physical count may be true at the shelf while the digital system reflects unscanned returns. Reconciliation has to repair the relationship among representations, not simply crown the most convenient one.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Multiple representations expected to describe the same referent have diverged, so acting from any one may produce an incorrect state or decision."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "This branch preserves the complete remedy-free diagnostic route; goals, feasibility clauses, gates, deployment constraints, and supporting context remain outside the DNF."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "EXT001-C076", "dnf": [["EXT001-U076-O1"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"obligation_id": "EXT001-U076-O1", "predicate": "Multiple records, states, accounts, or versions are expected to correspond to the same referent."}], "predicate": "Multiple records, states, accounts, or versions are expected to correspond to the same referent.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Multiple records, states, accounts, or versions are expected to correspond to the same referent.", "unit_id": "EXT001-U076"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"catalog_exhaustion": "CONDITION_LEVEL", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact record describes an intervention, control, or achieved configuration rather than a pre-existing situation that necessarily entails the atom.", "slug": "record_reconciliation"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Multiple records, states, accounts, or versions are expected to correspond to the same referent.", "slug": "variant_access_point"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Multiple records, states, accounts, or versions are expected to correspond to the same referent.", "slug": "metonymy"}], "residual_id": "EXT001:reconciliation_after_drift:C01", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding."}}, "condition_id": "ext001_reconciliation_after_drift_a01", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored trigger_conditions, structural_problem fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: Multiple records, states, accounts, or versions are expected to correspond to the same referent.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Multiple records, states, accounts, or versions are expected to correspond to the same referent."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact record describes an intervention, control, or achieved configuration rather than a pre-existing situation that necessarily entails the atom.", "slug": "record_reconciliation"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Multiple records, states, accounts, or versions are expected to correspond to the same referent.", "slug": "variant_access_point"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Multiple records, states, accounts, or versions are expected to correspond to the same referent.", "slug": "metonymy"}], "normalized_requirement": "Multiple records, states, accounts, or versions are expected to correspond to the same referent.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Multiple records, states, accounts, or versions are expected to correspond to the same referent.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "EXT001-C077", "dnf": [["EXT001-U077-O1"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"obligation_id": "EXT001-U077-O1", "predicate": "A mismatch or inconsistent outcome shows that those representations have diverged."}], "predicate": "A mismatch or inconsistent outcome shows that those representations have diverged.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A mismatch or inconsistent outcome shows that those representations have diverged.", "unit_id": "EXT001-U077"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"catalog_exhaustion": "CONDITION_LEVEL", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: A mismatch or inconsistent outcome shows that those representations have diverged.", "slug": "presentational_semantic_mismatch"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: A mismatch or inconsistent outcome shows that those representations have diverged.", "slug": "paradox_of_unanimity"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: A mismatch or inconsistent outcome shows that those representations have diverged.", "slug": "simpsons_paradox"}], "residual_id": "EXT001:reconciliation_after_drift:C02", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding."}}, "condition_id": "ext001_reconciliation_after_drift_a02", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored trigger_conditions, structural_problem fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: A mismatch or inconsistent outcome shows that those representations have diverged.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A mismatch or inconsistent outcome shows that those representations have diverged."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: A mismatch or inconsistent outcome shows that those representations have diverged.", "slug": "presentational_semantic_mismatch"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: A mismatch or inconsistent outcome shows that those representations have diverged.", "slug": "paradox_of_unanimity"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: A mismatch or inconsistent outcome shows that those representations have diverged.", "slug": "simpsons_paradox"}], "normalized_requirement": "A mismatch or inconsistent outcome shows that those representations have diverged.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A mismatch or inconsistent outcome shows that those representations have diverged.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Action requires a reconciled state before proceeding safely.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored trigger_conditions, structural_problem fields; the source file was not modified. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: Action requires a reconciled state before proceeding safely. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Action requires a reconciled state before proceeding safely.", "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored trigger_conditions, structural_problem fields; the source file was not modified."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Action requires a reconciled state before proceeding safely."}, {"display_text": "An authority, timestamp, custody chain, rule, or merge basis could govern repair.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored trigger_conditions, structural_problem fields; the source file was not modified. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: An authority, timestamp, custody chain, rule, or merge basis could govern repair. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["An authority, timestamp, custody chain, rule, or merge basis could govern repair.", "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored trigger_conditions, structural_problem fields; the source file was not modified."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "An authority, timestamp, custody chain, rule, or merge basis could govern repair."}, {"display_text": "The correction itself must remain inspectable.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored trigger_conditions, structural_problem fields; the source file was not modified. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: The correction itself must remain inspectable. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The correction itself must remain inspectable.", "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored trigger_conditions, structural_problem fields; the source file was not modified."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The correction itself must remain inspectable."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"candidate_ledger_sha256": "96f72d2139077fd57bf795048ebef33b3fd574b20963170080ec916b5b3b92fe", "extension_id": "new-archetypes-extension-001", "ledger_id": "prime-production-v1.2-extension-001", "ledger_sha256": "9644520614744632d1d36da44b1acd77ce432852c6083eb871203521c166efce"}, "base_projection_sha256": "841e0c7f3cb8e8054475ad29a8a14745a416b4fc115559a44878b94292e673ec", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "ca09ed9fe1598ce7072755b530de5553f5ee0a7cd64ae82d9e4a4e2149a37788", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Reconstruction-Resistant Disclosure Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:reconstruction_resistant_disclosure_design", "slug": "reconstruction_resistant_disclosure_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system releases outputs that do not directly contain a protected input, but those outputs can be combined with an observer’s prior knowledge, auxiliary datasets, repeated queries, side channels, or domain constraints to reconstruct the protected input to a harmful degree of confidence or resolution.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system releases outputs that do not directly contain a protected input, but those outputs can be combined with an observer’s prior knowledge, auxiliary datasets, repeated queries, side channels, or domain constraints to reconstruct the protected input to a harmful degree of confidence or resolution."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires a protected input driving a system whose informative observable outputs are disclosed.", "role_mapping": "Protected state -> input; report/API output -> disclosed observable.", "slug": "hidden_information_reconstruction", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b053_a07_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A dataset, model, report, dashboard, API, public record, audit artifact, map, ranking, summary, or explanation reveals derived outputs about protected people, events, states, locations, strategies, or systems. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A dataset, model, report, dashboard, API, public record, audit artifact, map, ranking, summary, or explanation reveals derived outputs about protected people, events, states, locations, strategies, or systems."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Hidden Information Reconstruction", "one_liner": "An observer combines a system's disclosed outputs with a prior over possible inputs to reconstruct a protected input to whatever resolution the prior permits, so privacy is a property of the (system, adversary-prior) pair rather than of the disclosure surface alone.", "page_ref": "prime:hidden_information_reconstruction", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Protected state -> input; report/API output -> disclosed observable.", "slug": "hidden_information_reconstruction", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires a protected input driving a system whose informative observable outputs are disclosed."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A system discloses derived outputs about protected people, events, states, locations, strategies, or systems.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A holder can understand reconstruction risk and use a disclosure channel without relying on surface removal.", "slug": "hidden_information_reconstruction"}], "residual_id": "r:reconstruction_resistant_disclosure_design:b053_a07_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b053_a07_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The releaser relies on removal, masking, aggregation, rounding, pseudonyms, summarization, access control, or field omission as if surface non-disclosure were sufficient. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The releaser relies on removal, masking, aggregation, rounding, pseudonyms, summarization, access control, or field omission as if surface non-disclosure were sufficient."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A holder can understand reconstruction risk and use a disclosure channel without relying on surface removal.", "slug": "hidden_information_reconstruction"}], "normalized_requirement": "The releaser treats removal, masking, aggregation, pseudonyms, or omission as sufficient non-disclosure.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The releaser treats removal, masking, aggregation, pseudonyms, or omission as sufficient non-disclosure.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "An observer prior over possible inputs is a mandatory role and determines achievable reconstruction resolution.", "role_mapping": "Auxiliary information -> prior; hidden inputs -> hypothesis space.", "slug": "hidden_information_reconstruction", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b053_a07_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Receivers may possess auxiliary information, base rates, public records, local knowledge, repeated observations, or strong priors that narrow possible hidden inputs. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Receivers may possess auxiliary information, base rates, public records, local knowledge, repeated observations, or strong priors that narrow possible hidden inputs."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Hidden Information Reconstruction", "one_liner": "An observer combines a system's disclosed outputs with a prior over possible inputs to reconstruct a protected input to whatever resolution the prior permits, so privacy is a property of the (system, adversary-prior) pair rather than of the disclosure surface alone.", "page_ref": "prime:hidden_information_reconstruction", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Auxiliary information -> prior; hidden inputs -> hypothesis space.", "slug": "hidden_information_reconstruction", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "An observer prior over possible inputs is a mandatory role and determines achievable reconstruction resolution."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Receivers possess auxiliary information or strong priors that narrow possible hidden inputs.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Privacy is defined over the system-output channel and adversary prior, not the disclosure surface alone.", "role_mapping": "Reconstructability -> inference fidelity; literal field -> surface content.", "slug": "hidden_information_reconstruction", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b053_a07_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The harm threshold depends on reconstructability, not merely on whether a sensitive field appears literally. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The harm threshold depends on reconstructability, not merely on whether a sensitive field appears literally."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Hidden Information Reconstruction", "one_liner": "An observer combines a system's disclosed outputs with a prior over possible inputs to reconstruct a protected input to whatever resolution the prior permits, so privacy is a property of the (system, adversary-prior) pair rather than of the disclosure surface alone.", "page_ref": "prime:hidden_information_reconstruction", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Reconstructability -> inference fidelity; literal field -> surface content.", "slug": "hidden_information_reconstruction", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Privacy is defined over the system-output channel and adversary prior, not the disclosure surface alone."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Harm depends on reconstructability rather than literal appearance of a sensitive field.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The output can be sliced, filtered, joined, differenced, ranked, timed, compared, queried repeatedly, or combined across releases.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system releases outputs that do not directly contain a protected input, but those outputs can be combined with an observer’s prior knowledge, auxiliary datasets, repeated queries, side channels, or domain constraints to reconstruct the protected input to a harmful degree of confidence or resolution. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The output can be sliced, filtered, joined, differenced, ranked, timed, compared, queried repeatedly, or combined across releases. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The output can be sliced, filtered, joined, differenced, ranked, timed, compared, queried repeatedly, or combined across releases.", "A system releases outputs that do not directly contain a protected input, but those outputs can be combined with an observer’s prior knowledge, auxiliary datasets, repeated queries, side channels, or domain constraints to reconstruct the protected input to a harmful degree of confidence or resolution."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The output can be sliced, filtered, joined, differenced, ranked, timed, compared, queried repeatedly, or combined across releases."}, {"display_text": "Useful disclosure is still desired, so the task is to bound inference while preserving legitimate information value.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "But useful outputs preserve information, and information can be inverted when the observer has enough prior structure. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: Useful disclosure is still desired, so the task is to bound inference while preserving legitimate information value. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Useful disclosure is still desired, so the task is to bound inference while preserving legitimate information value.", "But useful outputs preserve information, and information can be inverted when the observer has enough prior structure."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Useful disclosure is still desired, so the task is to bound inference while preserving legitimate information value."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 53, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-053", "ledger_sha256": "c05f9cf1b35e77ac89d848372294a3772e220b983e4ad46fd6172c2fbf9c5418"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Recovery Interval Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:recovery_interval_design", "slug": "recovery_interval_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 2 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 2}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a mismatch between exposure cadence and recovery cadence. The work, stimulus, alert, intervention, measurement, or demand repeats on one rhythm, while the system recovers on another. If the exposure rhythm is faster than recovery, the system may appear resistant, fragile, inattentive, or inefficient even though it is simply still carrying residue from prior load.\n\nThis pattern often hides because organizations count visible work but do not count recovery debt. A person may be “available” on a schedule while still depleted. A machine may be “running” while wear is accumulating. A monitoring channel may be “online” while attention has been exhausted. A study condition may be “over” while carryover effects still contaminate the next measurement.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system is repeatedly stimulated, loaded, activated, measured, or exposed faster than it can recover, causing diminished response, fatigue, accumulation, errors, degraded judgment, safety loss, or escalating intervention intensity."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Recovery follows one disruption and does not require repeated exposure.", "slug": "recovery"}], "residual_id": "r:recovery_interval_design:b053_a08_c1", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b053_a08_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The same system, actor, channel, process, or resource receives repeated load or stimulation over time. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The same system, actor, channel, process, or resource receives repeated load or stimulation over time."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Recovery follows one disruption and does not require repeated exposure.", "slug": "recovery"}], "normalized_requirement": "The same system receives repeated load or stimulation over time.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The same system receives repeated load or stimulation over time.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires the same exposure magnitude to produce progressively diminished effect after repetition.", "role_mapping": "Repeated load -> exposure; reduced responsiveness -> tolerance.", "slug": "tolerance", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b053_a08_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Recovery is not instantaneous; residual load, fatigue, carryover effects, depletion, or reduced responsiveness persist after each exposure. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Recovery is not instantaneous; residual load, fatigue, carryover effects, depletion, or reduced responsiveness persist after each exposure."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Tolerance", "one_liner": "Reduced effect with repetition.", "page_ref": "prime:tolerance", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Repeated load -> exposure; reduced responsiveness -> tolerance.", "slug": "tolerance", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires the same exposure magnitude to produce progressively diminished effect after repetition."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Reduced responsiveness persists after repeated or sustained exposure.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The timing between exposures can be changed, protected, or conditioned on readiness evidence.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially relevant when individual exposures look acceptable in isolation, but the spacing between them is too compressed for the system to regain readiness. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: The timing between exposures can be changed, protected, or conditioned on readiness evidence. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The timing between exposures can be changed, protected, or conditioned on readiness evidence.", "It is especially relevant when individual exposures look acceptable in isolation, but the spacing between them is too compressed for the system to regain readiness."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "The timing between exposures can be changed, protected, or conditioned on readiness evidence."}, {"display_text": "The cost of under-recovery is meaningful: harm, fatigue, waste, tolerance, degraded quality, safety risk, or delayed collapse.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system is repeatedly stimulated, loaded, activated, measured, or exposed faster than it can recover, causing diminished response, fatigue, accumulation, errors, degraded judgment, safety loss, or escalating intervention intensity. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The cost of under-recovery is meaningful: harm, fatigue, waste, tolerance, degraded quality, safety risk, or delayed collapse. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The cost of under-recovery is meaningful: harm, fatigue, waste, tolerance, degraded quality, safety risk, or delayed collapse.", "A system is repeatedly stimulated, loaded, activated, measured, or exposed faster than it can recover, causing diminished response, fatigue, accumulation, errors, degraded judgment, safety loss, or escalating intervention intensity."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The cost of under-recovery is meaningful: harm, fatigue, waste, tolerance, degraded quality, safety risk, or delayed collapse."}, {"display_text": "There is at least a rough way to observe readiness, residual load, or recovery completion.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is a poor fit when the exposure should simply stop, when there is no recovery process to design around, or when the actual problem is instantaneous capacity rather than residual load between exposures. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: There is at least a rough way to observe readiness, residual load, or recovery completion. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["There is at least a rough way to observe readiness, residual load, or recovery completion.", "It is a poor fit when the exposure should simply stop, when there is no recovery process to design around, or when the actual problem is instantaneous capacity rather than residual load between exposures."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "There is at least a rough way to observe readiness, residual load, or recovery completion."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 53, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-053", "ledger_sha256": "c05f9cf1b35e77ac89d848372294a3772e220b983e4ad46fd6172c2fbf9c5418"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Recovery Trajectory Management", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:recovery_trajectory_management", "slug": "recovery_trajectory_management"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "After disruption, a system is no longer in its prior working regime, but actors treat recovery as an event, slogan, repair checklist, or simple return to normal. Without explicit trajectory management, recovery may stop at visible repair, restore noncritical functions first, overload fragile capacity, miss transformed endpoint needs, or conceal residual damage until a second collapse occurs.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "After disruption, a system is no longer in its prior working regime, but actors treat recovery as an event, slogan, repair checklist, or simple return to normal. Without explicit trajectory management, recovery may stop at visible repair, restore noncritical functions first, overload fragile capacity, miss transformed endpoint needs, or conceal residual damage until a second collapse occurs."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record begins after a disruption has displaced a system from its functional regime.", "role_mapping": "Shock -> prior disruption; working function -> functional regime.", "slug": "recovery", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b053_a09_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A shock, failure, disaster, conflict, outage, illness, rupture, or depletion event has displaced the system from working function. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A shock, failure, disaster, conflict, outage, illness, rupture, or depletion event has displaced the system from working function."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Recovery", "one_liner": "The post-disruption trajectory by which a damaged or displaced system moves back toward a working state, through discernible phases, to an endpoint that may be the original state or a transformed one.", "page_ref": "prime:recovery", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Shock -> prior disruption; working function -> functional regime.", "slug": "recovery", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record begins after a disruption has displaced a system from its functional regime."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A shock or failure displaced the system from working function.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires a return trajectory through discernible assessment, stabilization, restoration, and reorganization phases.", "role_mapping": "Return -> recovery trajectory; phases -> staged restoration.", "slug": "recovery", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b053_a09_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The system can plausibly move back toward viable function, but that movement requires phases rather than one immediate action. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The system can plausibly move back toward viable function, but that movement requires phases rather than one immediate action."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Recovery", "one_liner": "The post-disruption trajectory by which a damaged or displaced system moves back toward a working state, through discernible phases, to an endpoint that may be the original state or a transformed one.", "page_ref": "prime:recovery", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Return -> recovery trajectory; phases -> staged restoration.", "slug": "recovery", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires a return trajectory through discernible assessment, stabilization, restoration, and reorganization phases."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Movement back toward function is possible but unfolds through phases rather than one action.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The endpoint may be the original state or a transformed state that is functional after changed conditions.", "role_mapping": "Endpoints -> recovery destinations; transformed state -> adaptive recovery.", "slug": "recovery", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b053_a09_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: There are multiple possible recovery endpoints, including prior baseline, minimum viable function, partial function, or transformed working state. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["There are multiple possible recovery endpoints, including prior baseline, minimum viable function, partial function, or transformed working state."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Recovery", "one_liner": "The post-disruption trajectory by which a damaged or displaced system moves back toward a working state, through discernible phases, to an endpoint that may be the original state or a transformed one.", "page_ref": "prime:recovery", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Endpoints -> recovery destinations; transformed state -> adaptive recovery.", "slug": "recovery", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The endpoint may be the original state or a transformed state that is functional after changed conditions."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Possible endpoints include prior baseline, minimum function, partial function, or a transformed working state.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A recovery trajectory can proceed safely without premature reentry or secondary harm.", "slug": "recovery"}], "residual_id": "r:recovery_trajectory_management:b053_a09_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b053_a09_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Premature restoration or reentry could cause secondary harm, relapse, overload, or loss of trust. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Premature restoration or reentry could cause secondary harm, relapse, overload, or loss of trust."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A recovery trajectory can proceed safely without premature reentry or secondary harm.", "slug": "recovery"}], "normalized_requirement": "Premature restoration or reentry could cause relapse, overload, secondary harm, or distrust.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Premature restoration or reentry could cause relapse, overload, secondary harm, or distrust.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Recovery work must prioritize among functions, stakeholders, dependencies, risks, and resource constraints.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Recovery needs continuity with what made the system valuable before disruption, yet the disruption may have changed the system, its environment, its risks, and its legitimacy. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: Recovery work must prioritize among functions, stakeholders, dependencies, risks, and resource constraints. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Recovery work must prioritize among functions, stakeholders, dependencies, risks, and resource constraints.", "Recovery needs continuity with what made the system valuable before disruption, yet the disruption may have changed the system, its environment, its risks, and its legitimacy."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Recovery work must prioritize among functions, stakeholders, dependencies, risks, and resource constraints."}, {"display_text": "The quality of recovery must be monitored over time, not declared by a single visible repair.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Without explicit trajectory management, recovery may stop at visible repair, restore noncritical functions first, overload fragile capacity, miss transformed endpoint needs, or conceal residual damage until a second collapse occurs. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: The quality of recovery must be monitored over time, not declared by a single visible repair. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The quality of recovery must be monitored over time, not declared by a single visible repair.", "Without explicit trajectory management, recovery may stop at visible repair, restore noncritical functions first, overload fragile capacity, miss transformed endpoint needs, or conceal residual damage until a second collapse occurs."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The quality of recovery must be monitored over time, not declared by a single visible repair."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 53, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-053", "ledger_sha256": "c05f9cf1b35e77ac89d848372294a3772e220b983e4ad46fd6172c2fbf9c5418"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Recursive Problem Decomposition", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:recursive_problem_decomposition", "slug": "recursive_problem_decomposition"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a mismatch between the size of the whole and the capacity to solve it directly. The problem becomes tractable only if it can be reduced while preserving its essential form.\n\nThe danger is that naive splitting can lose the very structure that made the whole meaningful. A legal issue split into fragments may lose burdens of proof. A design problem split into parts may lose integration constraints. A diagnostic tree may exclude the real cause too early. Recursive decomposition only works when the subproblem boundary, the base case, and the recombination rule preserve the meaning of the original problem.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A large problem contains smaller structurally similar subproblems, but direct solution is too complex or unwieldy, and ordinary one-level decomposition does not provide enough disciplined stopping, recursion, or recombination logic."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record defines a larger instance in terms of smaller instances of the same kind.", "role_mapping": "Problem -> recursive instance; nested structure -> smaller self-similar cases.", "slug": "recursion", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The exact record requires overlapping subproblems of the same state-defined form.", "role_mapping": "Repeated structure -> overlapping subproblems; whole -> optimization problem.", "slug": "dynamic_programming", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b053_a10_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The problem has repeated or nested structure. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The problem has repeated or nested structure."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Recursion", "one_liner": "Breaks processes into self-similar steps.", "page_ref": "prime:recursion", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Problem -> recursive instance; nested structure -> smaller self-similar cases.", "slug": "recursion", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record defines a larger instance in terms of smaller instances of the same kind."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Dynamic Programming", "one_liner": "Solve via subproblem reuse.", "page_ref": "prime:dynamic_programming", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Repeated structure -> overlapping subproblems; whole -> optimization problem.", "slug": "dynamic_programming", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires overlapping subproblems of the same state-defined form."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The problem has repeated or nested self-similar structure.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A recursive definition can solve a small, tractable problem and need not address overload.", "slug": "recursion"}], "residual_id": "r:recursive_problem_decomposition:b053_a10_c2", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b053_a10_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when the whole problem is too complex for direct solution, but its internal structure repeats. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Direct solution overwhelms available reasoning, computation, coordination, or design capacity.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Direct solution overwhelms available reasoning, computation, coordination, or design capacity.", "Use this archetype when the whole problem is too complex for direct solution, but its internal structure repeats."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A recursive definition can solve a small, tractable problem and need not address overload.", "slug": "recursion"}], "normalized_requirement": "Direct solution overwhelms available reasoning, computation, coordination, or design capacity.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Direct solution overwhelms available reasoning, computation, coordination, or design capacity.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The recursive case must reduce an instance to smaller instances of the same kind.", "role_mapping": "Smaller case -> recursive subinstance; preserved structure -> same definition.", "slug": "recursion", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "Optimal substructure requires the whole solution to be constructible from valid subproblem solutions.", "role_mapping": "Smaller cases -> DP states; preserved structure -> optimal substructure.", "slug": "dynamic_programming", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b053_a10_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Smaller cases can be defined without destroying the relevant structure of the original problem. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Smaller cases can be defined without destroying the relevant structure of the original problem."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Recursion", "one_liner": "Breaks processes into self-similar steps.", "page_ref": "prime:recursion", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Smaller case -> recursive subinstance; preserved structure -> same definition.", "slug": "recursion", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The recursive case must reduce an instance to smaller instances of the same kind."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Dynamic Programming", "one_liner": "Solve via subproblem reuse.", "page_ref": "prime:dynamic_programming", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Smaller cases -> DP states; preserved structure -> optimal substructure.", "slug": "dynamic_programming", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Optimal substructure requires the whole solution to be constructible from valid subproblem solutions."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Smaller cases can be defined without losing the original problem's relevant structure.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A terminating base case is mandatory for well-founded recursion.", "role_mapping": "Direct leaf -> base case; stopping -> termination.", "slug": "recursion", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b053_a10_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A base case or directly solvable leaf can be specified. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A base case or directly solvable leaf can be specified."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Recursion", "one_liner": "Breaks processes into self-similar steps.", "page_ref": "prime:recursion", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Direct leaf -> base case; stopping -> termination.", "slug": "recursion", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A terminating base case is mandatory for well-founded recursion."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A directly solvable base case can be specified.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The recursive rule composes results from smaller instances into the larger result.", "role_mapping": "Subproblem result -> recursive return; whole -> parent instance.", "slug": "recursion", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The recurrence and traceback combine stored subproblem values into an optimal whole solution.", "role_mapping": "Subproblem result -> table value; combination -> recurrence.", "slug": "dynamic_programming", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b053_a10_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Subproblem results can be combined, propagated, or closed. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Subproblem results can be combined, propagated, or closed."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Recursion", "one_liner": "Breaks processes into self-similar steps.", "page_ref": "prime:recursion", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Subproblem result -> recursive return; whole -> parent instance.", "slug": "recursion", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The recursive rule composes results from smaller instances into the larger result."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Dynamic Programming", "one_liner": "Solve via subproblem reuse.", "page_ref": "prime:dynamic_programming", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Subproblem result -> table value; combination -> recurrence.", "slug": "dynamic_programming", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The recurrence and traceback combine stored subproblem values into an optimal whole solution."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Subproblem results can be combined or propagated to close the whole.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 53, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-053", "ledger_sha256": "c05f9cf1b35e77ac89d848372294a3772e220b983e4ad46fd6172c2fbf9c5418"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Recursive Triangulation of Triangulation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:recursive_triangulation_of_triangulation", "slug": "recursive_triangulation_of_triangulation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 5 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A claim, model, diagnosis, evaluation, or decision has been justified by triangulation, but the triangulation procedure may itself be biased, circular, overdependent, miscalibrated, or insensitive to conflicts among evidence streams.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A claim, model, diagnosis, evaluation, or decision has been justified by triangulation, but the triangulation procedure may itself be biased, circular, overdependent, miscalibrated, or insensitive to conflicts among evidence streams."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record cross-verifies one claim through multiple methodologically distinct sources or methods.", "role_mapping": "Methods/sources -> evidence streams; confidence -> convergence warrant.", "slug": "triangulation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b053_a11_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A decision cites multiple methods, data sources, observers, or perspectives as evidence of confidence. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A decision cites multiple methods, data sources, observers, or perspectives as evidence of confidence."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Triangulation", "one_liner": "Cross-verifying a claim by combining multiple independent sources or methods so their convergence raises confidence and their divergence exposes hidden bias or context.", "page_ref": "prime:triangulation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Methods/sources -> evidence streams; confidence -> convergence warrant.", "slug": "triangulation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record cross-verifies one claim through multiple methodologically distinct sources or methods."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A decision cites multiple methods, sources, observers, or perspectives as confidence evidence.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact record calls for independent streams, which can be genuinely independent.", "slug": "triangulation"}], "residual_id": "r:recursive_triangulation_of_triangulation:b053_a11_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b053_a11_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The evidence streams may share upstream data, instruments, assumptions, incentives, theory commitments, or institutional sources. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The evidence streams may share upstream data, instruments, assumptions, incentives, theory commitments, or institutional sources."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact record calls for independent streams, which can be genuinely independent.", "slug": "triangulation"}], "normalized_requirement": "Evidence streams share upstream data, instruments, assumptions, incentives, theories, or institutions.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Evidence streams share upstream data, instruments, assumptions, incentives, theories, or institutions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Independent sources can agree for a clear shared target reason.", "slug": "triangulation"}], "residual_id": "r:recursive_triangulation_of_triangulation:b053_a11_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b053_a11_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Different evidence sources agree, but the reason for agreement is unclear. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Different evidence sources agree, but the reason for agreement is unclear."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Independent sources can agree for a clear shared target reason.", "slug": "triangulation"}], "normalized_requirement": "Evidence sources agree but the cause of agreement is unclear.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Evidence sources agree but the cause of agreement is unclear.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A triangulation design can explicitly reconcile divergence.", "slug": "triangulation"}], "residual_id": "r:recursive_triangulation_of_triangulation:b053_a11_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b053_a11_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Evidence sources disagree, and the team lacks a rule for interpreting whether the conflict weakens, refines, or invalidates the conclusion. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Evidence sources disagree, and the team lacks a rule for interpreting whether the conflict weakens, refines, or invalidates the conclusion."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A triangulation design can explicitly reconcile divergence.", "slug": "triangulation"}], "normalized_requirement": "Evidence streams disagree without a rule for weakening, refining, or rejecting the conclusion.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Evidence streams disagree without a rule for weakening, refining, or rejecting the conclusion.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Triangulation can be designed anew for one context.", "slug": "triangulation"}], "residual_id": "r:recursive_triangulation_of_triangulation:b053_a11_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b053_a11_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The triangulation procedure has been reused across contexts, time windows, populations, or systems without auditing transfer boundaries. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The triangulation procedure has been reused across contexts, time windows, populations, or systems without auditing transfer boundaries."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Triangulation can be designed anew for one context.", "slug": "triangulation"}], "normalized_requirement": "A triangulation procedure is reused across contexts without auditing transfer boundaries.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A triangulation procedure is reused across contexts without auditing transfer boundaries.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The stakes are high enough that “we triangulated it” is not sufficient without validating the triangulation design.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: The stakes are high enough that “we triangulated it” is not sufficient without validating the triangulation design. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The stakes are high enough that “we triangulated it” is not sufficient without validating the triangulation design."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "The stakes are high enough that “we triangulated it” is not sufficient without validating the triangulation design."}, {"display_text": "Reviewers need to know whether to trust, narrow, repeat, redesign, or reject the original triangulated conclusion.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: Reviewers need to know whether to trust, narrow, repeat, redesign, or reject the original triangulated conclusion. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Reviewers need to know whether to trust, narrow, repeat, redesign, or reject the original triangulated conclusion."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "Reviewers need to know whether to trust, narrow, repeat, redesign, or reject the original triangulated conclusion."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 53, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-053", "ledger_sha256": "c05f9cf1b35e77ac89d848372294a3772e220b983e4ad46fd6172c2fbf9c5418"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Reduced Wage-Labor Mediation and Direct Value Realization", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:reduced_wage_labor_mediation_and_direct_value_realization", "slug": "reduced_wage_labor_mediation_and_direct_value_realization"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Work produces value, but the people doing the work experience that value as externally owned, opaquely priced, anonymously attributed, or controlled by intermediaries. A fixed wage, platform commission, managerial hierarchy, or market gatekeeper may coordinate production but also separate contributors from output, surplus, users, meaning, and decision rights.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Work produces value, but the people doing the work experience that value as externally owned, opaquely priced, anonymously attributed, or controlled by intermediaries. A fixed wage, platform commission, managerial hierarchy, or market gatekeeper may coordinate production but also separate contributors from output, surplus, users, meaning, and decision rights."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P092-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve contributor, work, realized-value, and beneficiary roles.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Contributors perform work that becomes value and produces benefits for one or more parties.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail contributor-side opacity rather than information that is available but ignored.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Contributors cannot access the selected value-realization information.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires opacity of the work-to-value transformation path.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Contributors cannot see how their work is transformed into value.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires opacity of beneficiary identity or allocation.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Contributors cannot see who benefits from the value their work produces.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Contributors cannot see how their work becomes value or who benefits from that value.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "contributors lack visibility into value realization or beneficiaries", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P092-C05-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Value commensuration can be transparent and does not require wage labor or hidden beneficiaries.", "slug": "value_commensuration"}], "residual_id": "r:reduced_wage_labor_mediation_and_direct_value_realization:b053_a12_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b053_a12_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Contributors cannot see how their work becomes value or who benefits from it. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Contributors cannot see how their work becomes value or who benefits from it."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Value commensuration can be transparent and does not require wage labor or hidden beneficiaries.", "slug": "value_commensuration"}], "normalized_requirement": "Contributors cannot see how work becomes value or who benefits.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Contributors cannot see how work becomes value or who benefits.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P092-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O9"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5", "O9"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6", "O9"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7", "O9"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve worker, value-production, and labor-mediation roles.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Workers produce value under a labor-mediating compensation, platform, or managerial arrangement.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail allocation of upside to the mediating layer rather than neutral coordination alone.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The mediating layer captures upside produced through the workers' labor.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve majority or dominant upside capture, not a minor fee or ordinary shared return.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The mediating layer captures most of the upside.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This intermediary-type branch requires wage-based labor mediation.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The mediation is implemented through a wage arrangement.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This intermediary-type branch requires commission-based labor mediation.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The mediation is implemented through a commission arrangement.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This intermediary-type branch requires a platform between workers and value realization.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The mediation is implemented through a platform layer.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This intermediary-type branch requires managerial mediation of labor and value.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The mediation is implemented through a managerial layer.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This worker-burden branch requires constrained worker influence or decision rights.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "Workers have limited voice under the arrangement.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This worker-burden branch requires risk borne by workers to increase.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "Workers bear growing risk under the arrangement.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A labor-mediating wage, commission, platform, or managerial layer captures most upside while workers have limited voice or bear growing risk.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "labor-mediating layer captures most upside while workers lack voice or bear growing risk", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P092-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Moral hazard concerns hidden action under insulated downside, not labor surplus capture.", "slug": "moral_hazard"}], "residual_id": "r:reduced_wage_labor_mediation_and_direct_value_realization:b053_a12_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b053_a12_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A wage, commission, platform, or managerial layer captures most upside while workers bear limited voice or growing risk. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A wage, commission, platform, or managerial layer captures most upside while workers bear limited voice or growing risk."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Moral hazard concerns hidden action under insulated downside, not labor surplus capture.", "slug": "moral_hazard"}], "normalized_requirement": "A wage, commission, platform, or managerial layer captures upside while workers have little voice or growing risk.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A wage, commission, platform, or managerial layer captures upside while workers have little voice or growing risk.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P092-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve actual contribution visibility rather than treating invisibility as the cause.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A contributor's contribution is visible or attributable.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail a failed visibility-to-benefit translation, not merely coexistence of visibility and an unrelated shortfall.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Contribution visibility fails to produce the selected contributor-facing outcome.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires absence of a contributor claim despite visibility.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Visibility does not translate into a claim on the produced value or output.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires absence of influence or decision rights despite visibility.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Visibility does not translate into contributor voice.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires absence of contributor-facing feedback despite visibility.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Visibility does not translate into feedback for the contributor.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires absence of sustainable livelihood support despite visibility.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "Visibility does not translate into a sustainable livelihood.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A contribution is visible, but its visibility does not translate into claim, voice, feedback, or sustainable livelihood for the contributor.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "visible contribution fails to yield a listed contributor benefit", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P092-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Responsibility attribution can assign causal credit without ownership, voice, or livelihood.", "slug": "responsibility_attribution"}], "residual_id": "r:reduced_wage_labor_mediation_and_direct_value_realization:b053_a12_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b053_a12_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Contribution visibility exists but does not translate into claim, voice, feedback, or sustainable livelihood. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Contribution visibility exists but does not translate into claim, voice, feedback, or sustainable livelihood."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Responsibility attribution can assign causal credit without ownership, voice, or livelihood.", "slug": "responsibility_attribution"}], "normalized_requirement": "Contribution visibility does not translate into claim, voice, feedback, or sustainable livelihood.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Contribution visibility does not translate into claim, voice, feedback, or sustainable livelihood.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P092-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O4", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve contributor, intermediary, and participation-resource roles.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Contributors depend on an intermediary for a resource needed to produce or reach a market.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail gatekeeping or control, not merely provision of an optional service.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The intermediary controls the selected participation resource.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This resource branch requires intermediary control over access to buyers, clients, or exchange.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The controlled resource is market access.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This resource branch requires intermediary control over tools needed for production.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The controlled resource is a production tool.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This rule-property branch requires that affected contributors cannot adequately inspect or understand the governing rules.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The intermediary's governing rules are opaque.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This rule-property branch requires rules that appropriate disproportionate value or impose exploitative terms on contributors.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The intermediary's governing rules are extractive.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "An intermediary controls market access or production tools under rules that are opaque or extractive.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "intermediary controls labor participation resources under opaque or extractive rules", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P092-C08-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Structural filtering can select information or entrants without capturing labor value.", "slug": "structural_filtering"}], "residual_id": "r:reduced_wage_labor_mediation_and_direct_value_realization:b053_a12_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b053_a12_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Market access or production tools are controlled by intermediaries whose rules are opaque or extractive. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Market access or production tools are controlled by intermediaries whose rules are opaque or extractive."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Structural filtering can select information or entrants without capturing labor value.", "slug": "structural_filtering"}], "normalized_requirement": "Market access or production tools are controlled by opaque or extractive intermediaries.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Market access or production tools are controlled by opaque or extractive intermediaries.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Workers want more control over pricing, customer relationship, product quality, surplus use, or work standards.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Work produces value, but the people doing the work experience that value as externally owned, opaquely priced, anonymously attributed, or controlled by intermediaries. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: Workers want more control over pricing, customer relationship, product quality, surplus use, or work standards. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Workers want more control over pricing, customer relationship, product quality, surplus use, or work standards.", "Work produces value, but the people doing the work experience that value as externally owned, opaquely priced, anonymously attributed, or controlled by intermediaries."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Workers want more control over pricing, customer relationship, product quality, surplus use, or work standards."}, {"display_text": "A direct-market option exists but would expose individuals to underpricing, volatility, or bargaining asymmetry without support.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The archetype balances useful coordination against alienating separation, and direct value against unmanaged individual risk. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: A direct-market option exists but would expose individuals to underpricing, volatility, or bargaining asymmetry without support. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A direct-market option exists but would expose individuals to underpricing, volatility, or bargaining asymmetry without support.", "The archetype balances useful coordination against alienating separation, and direct value against unmanaged individual risk."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "A direct-market option exists but would expose individuals to underpricing, volatility, or bargaining asymmetry without support."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 53, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-053", "ledger_sha256": "c05f9cf1b35e77ac89d848372294a3772e220b983e4ad46fd6172c2fbf9c5418"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Redundant Backup Provisioning", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:redundant_backup_provisioning", "slug": "redundant_backup_provisioning"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 2 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 2}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is single-point dependence. A function that matters to the system is concentrated in one primary dependency. That dependency may be efficient in normal conditions, but its loss removes the function entirely or delays restoration beyond acceptable limits.\n\nThe tension is that redundancy looks wasteful until it is needed. A system optimized only for normal efficiency often removes “duplicate” capability, cross-training, spare parts, alternate suppliers, replicated records, and backup access. When disruption arrives, the missing duplicate becomes the bottleneck. Good backup provisioning pays a controlled overhead before failure so continuity is not hostage to one vulnerable element.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A critical function has a single point of failure or insufficient backup capacity, so loss of one component, actor, supplier, record, location, tool, or resource can remove the function entirely."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid redundant system has multiple functionally equivalent components and no single required element.", "slug": "redundancy"}], "residual_id": "r:redundant_backup_provisioning:b053_a13_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b053_a13_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when a critical function depends on one component, person, supplier, record set, site, tool, credential, or resource whose failure would interrupt continuity beyond tolerance. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A critical function depends on one vulnerable element.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A critical function depends on one vulnerable element", "Use this archetype when a critical function depends on one component, person, supplier, record set, site, tool, credential, or resource whose failure would interrupt continuity beyond tolerance."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid redundant system has multiple functionally equivalent components and no single required element.", "slug": "redundancy"}], "normalized_requirement": "A critical function depends on one vulnerable element.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A critical function depends on one vulnerable element.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A fault-tolerant system continues acceptable service under the specified failure.", "slug": "fault_tolerance"}], "residual_id": "r:redundant_backup_provisioning:b053_a13_c2", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b053_a13_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when a critical function depends on one component, person, supplier, record set, site, tool, credential, or resource whose failure would interrupt continuity beyond tolerance. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Failure would interrupt continuity beyond tolerance.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Failure would interrupt continuity beyond tolerance", "Use this archetype when a critical function depends on one component, person, supplier, record set, site, tool, credential, or resource whose failure would interrupt continuity beyond tolerance."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A fault-tolerant system continues acceptable service under the specified failure.", "slug": "fault_tolerance"}], "normalized_requirement": "Failure would interrupt continuity beyond tolerance.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Failure would interrupt continuity beyond tolerance.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A substitute capability can be provisioned before failure.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when the system can provision a substitute before failure but cannot safely rely on emergency procurement, improvisation, or repair after failure. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: A substitute capability can be provisioned before failure. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A substitute capability can be provisioned before failure", "It is especially useful when the system can provision a substitute before failure but cannot safely rely on emergency procurement, improvisation, or repair after failure."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "A substitute capability can be provisioned before failure"}, {"display_text": "Activation time and coverage requirements can be specified.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: Activation time and coverage requirements can be specified. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Activation time and coverage requirements can be specified"]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Activation time and coverage requirements can be specified"}, {"display_text": "Independence assumptions can be tested.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: Independence assumptions can be tested. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Independence assumptions can be tested"]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Independence assumptions can be tested"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 53, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-053", "ledger_sha256": "c05f9cf1b35e77ac89d848372294a3772e220b983e4ad46fd6172c2fbf9c5418"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Reference-Baseline Deviation Flagging", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:reference_baseline_deviation_flagging", "slug": "reference_baseline_deviation_flagging"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 5, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Observations are collected, displayed, or acted upon without a durable reference context. Stakeholders can see values but cannot tell whether they are normal, improved, degraded, exceptional, concerning, or simply measured under a different baseline. Alternatively, deviations are noticed informally but are not recorded as first-class facts, so later diagnosis, escalation, auditing, and trend analysis lose the baseline, direction, magnitude, uncertainty, and context that made the departure meaningful.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Observations are collected, displayed, or acted upon without a durable reference context. Stakeholders can see values but cannot tell whether they are normal, improved, degraded, exceptional, concerning, or simply measured under a different baseline. Alternatively, deviations are noticed informally but are not recorded as first-class facts, so later diagnosis, escalation, auditing, and trend analysis lose the baseline, direction, magnitude, uncertainty, and context that made the departure meaningful."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record pairs an observed bearer-value with a declared expected or normal reference.", "role_mapping": "Value -> observable; baseline -> reference; bearer -> observed entity.", "slug": "baseline_deviation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b053_a14_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A value, event, behavior, measurement, cost, risk, performance metric, or state must be interpreted relative to a baseline, target, norm, prior period, expected range, comparator, or null model. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A value, event, behavior, measurement, cost, risk, performance metric, or state must be interpreted relative to a baseline, target, norm, prior period, expected range, comparator, or null model."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Baseline Deviation", "one_liner": "An observation is interpreted against a declared reference and flagged as departing from it, producing deviation as a first-class fact.", "page_ref": "prime:baseline_deviation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Value -> observable; baseline -> reference; bearer -> observed entity.", "slug": "baseline_deviation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record pairs an observed bearer-value with a declared expected or normal reference."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A value or state must be interpreted against a baseline, target, norm, comparator, range, or null.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An observation can be unambiguous because its declared reference and context are already attached.", "slug": "baseline_deviation"}], "residual_id": "r:reference_baseline_deviation_flagging:b053_a14_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b053_a14_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Raw observations alone are ambiguous because units differ by scale, context, seasonality, subgroup, measurement method, or exposure. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Raw observations alone are ambiguous because units differ by scale, context, seasonality, subgroup, measurement method, or exposure."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An observation can be unambiguous because its declared reference and context are already attached.", "slug": "baseline_deviation"}], "normalized_requirement": "Raw observations are ambiguous across scale, context, season, subgroup, method, or exposure.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Raw observations are ambiguous across scale, context, season, subgroup, method, or exposure.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The defining move promotes deviation to a published first-class queryable annotation.", "role_mapping": "Departure -> deviation fact; later search -> first-class record.", "slug": "baseline_deviation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b053_a14_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: A departure from the reference should be searchable, countable, reviewable, escalatable, or analyzable later. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["A departure from the reference should be searchable, countable, reviewable, escalatable, or analyzable later."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Baseline Deviation", "one_liner": "An observation is interpreted against a declared reference and flagged as departing from it, producing deviation as a first-class fact.", "page_ref": "prime:baseline_deviation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Departure -> deviation fact; later search -> first-class record.", "slug": "baseline_deviation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The defining move promotes deviation to a published first-class queryable annotation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A departure should remain searchable, countable, reviewable, escalatable, or analyzable.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Reference selection is a contestable modeling choice, so the departure judgment depends on the declared baseline.", "role_mapping": "Observation -> fixed value; baselines -> alternative references.", "slug": "baseline_deviation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b053_a14_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The same observation could be normal under one baseline and abnormal under another. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The same observation could be normal under one baseline and abnormal under another."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Baseline Deviation", "one_liner": "An observation is interpreted against a declared reference and flagged as departing from it, producing deviation as a first-class fact.", "page_ref": "prime:baseline_deviation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Observation -> fixed value; baselines -> alternative references.", "slug": "baseline_deviation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Reference selection is a contestable modeling choice, so the departure judgment depends on the declared baseline."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The same observation can be normal under one baseline and abnormal under another.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The departure judgment is reference-relative, so changing the reference changes the encoded deviation for the same observation.", "role_mapping": "Versioned baseline -> reference; historical value -> observation.", "slug": "baseline_deviation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b053_a14_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Baseline choice, version, or drift can change the interpretation of historical observations. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Baseline choice, version, or drift can change the interpretation of historical observations."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Baseline Deviation", "one_liner": "An observation is interpreted against a declared reference and flagged as departing from it, producing deviation as a first-class fact.", "page_ref": "prime:baseline_deviation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Versioned baseline -> reference; historical value -> observation.", "slug": "baseline_deviation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The departure judgment is reference-relative, so changing the reference changes the encoded deviation for the same observation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Baseline choice, version, or drift changes interpretation of historical observations.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record encodes direction and magnitude of departure without asserting why it occurred.", "role_mapping": "Flag -> deviation annotation; no causality -> descriptive comparison.", "slug": "baseline_deviation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b053_a14_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Operational or analytic systems need an exception, residual, variance, delta, anomaly, or out-of-range flag without yet claiming causality. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Operational or analytic systems need an exception, residual, variance, delta, anomaly, or out-of-range flag without yet claiming causality."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Baseline Deviation", "one_liner": "An observation is interpreted against a declared reference and flagged as departing from it, producing deviation as a first-class fact.", "page_ref": "prime:baseline_deviation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Flag -> deviation annotation; no causality -> descriptive comparison.", "slug": "baseline_deviation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record encodes direction and magnitude of departure without asserting why it occurred."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The system needs a delta, residual, variance, anomaly, or out-of-range flag without claiming causality.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "False alarms and missed deviations both matter, requiring explicit threshold, tolerance, or uncertainty handling.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Deviation facts need enough reference structure to be meaningful, but not so much interpretation that they smuggle in causality, blame, alarm, or policy response before the departure has been validated. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: False alarms and missed deviations both matter, requiring explicit threshold, tolerance, or uncertainty handling. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["False alarms and missed deviations both matter, requiring explicit threshold, tolerance, or uncertainty handling.", "Deviation facts need enough reference structure to be meaningful, but not so much interpretation that they smuggle in causality, blame, alarm, or policy response before the departure has been validated."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "False alarms and missed deviations both matter, requiring explicit threshold, tolerance, or uncertainty handling."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 53, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-053", "ledger_sha256": "c05f9cf1b35e77ac89d848372294a3772e220b983e4ad46fd6172c2fbf9c5418"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Reference-Class Planning Calibration", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:reference_class_planning_calibration", "slug": "reference_class_planning_calibration"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A person, team, institution, or model forecasts the time, cost, and risk of a planned task by simulating the intended local sequence while underweighting comparable prior outcomes; the plan becomes a promise before base rates, variance, dependencies, rework, and tail risks can correct it.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A person, team, institution, or model forecasts the time, cost, and risk of a planned task by simulating the intended local sequence while underweighting comparable prior outcomes; the plan becomes a promise before base rates, variance, dependencies, rework, and tail risks can correct it."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires a planner to treat a partly novel task through inside-view simulation while an outside-view reference class is available but unused.", "role_mapping": "Novel framing -> inside view; comparable cases -> reference class.", "slug": "planning_fallacy", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b053_a15_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The work is treated as novel, exceptional, strategically important, or reputation-sensitive even though comparable cases exist. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The work is treated as novel, exceptional, strategically important, or reputation-sensitive even though comparable cases exist."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Planning Fallacy", "one_liner": "Forecasters of a novel task default to inside-view simulation over the outside-view reference class, systematically underestimating time, cost, and risk.", "page_ref": "prime:planning_fallacy", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Novel framing -> inside view; comparable cases -> reference class.", "slug": "planning_fallacy", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires a planner to treat a partly novel task through inside-view simulation while an outside-view reference class is available but unused."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Work is treated as exceptional or novel although comparable cases exist.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The defining mechanism substitutes vivid inside-view step simulation for the empirical outside-view distribution.", "role_mapping": "Completion story -> inside-view simulation; overruns -> omitted reference evidence.", "slug": "planning_fallacy", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b053_a15_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Local experts can tell a coherent completion story but lack calibrated memory of past overruns and rework. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Local experts can tell a coherent completion story but lack calibrated memory of past overruns and rework."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Planning Fallacy", "one_liner": "Forecasters of a novel task default to inside-view simulation over the outside-view reference class, systematically underestimating time, cost, and risk.", "page_ref": "prime:planning_fallacy", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Completion story -> inside-view simulation; overruns -> omitted reference evidence.", "slug": "planning_fallacy", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The defining mechanism substitutes vivid inside-view step simulation for the empirical outside-view distribution."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Local experts tell a coherent completion story without calibrated memory of overruns and rework.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Comparable past attempts are available but psychologically or procedurally unused in favor of the inside view.", "role_mapping": "Historical cases -> reference class; not linked -> outside-view omission.", "slug": "planning_fallacy", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b053_a15_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: Historical cases are available but scattered, sanitized, politically inconvenient, or not linked to the current forecast. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["Historical cases are available but scattered, sanitized, politically inconvenient, or not linked to the current forecast."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Planning Fallacy", "one_liner": "Forecasters of a novel task default to inside-view simulation over the outside-view reference class, systematically underestimating time, cost, and risk.", "page_ref": "prime:planning_fallacy", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Historical cases -> reference class; not linked -> outside-view omission.", "slug": "planning_fallacy", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Comparable past attempts are available but psychologically or procedurally unused in favor of the inside view."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Historical cases exist but are scattered, sanitized, inconvenient, or not linked to the forecast.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires inside-view simulation to omit the long tail of unanticipated dependencies and interruptions, creating downward-biased time and cost estimates.", "role_mapping": "Dependencies -> omitted tail; compressed estimate -> downward bias.", "slug": "planning_fallacy", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b053_a15_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source archetype describes the situation as follows: The task contains dependencies, handoffs, approval queues, integration work, procurement, testing, or coordination overhead that inside-view simulation tends to compress. The normalized requirement above isolates the load-bearing portion used in this condition set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["The task contains dependencies, handoffs, approval queues, integration work, procurement, testing, or coordination overhead that inside-view simulation tends to compress."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Planning Fallacy", "one_liner": "Forecasters of a novel task default to inside-view simulation over the outside-view reference class, systematically underestimating time, cost, and risk.", "page_ref": "prime:planning_fallacy", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Dependencies -> omitted tail; compressed estimate -> downward bias.", "slug": "planning_fallacy", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires inside-view simulation to omit the long tail of unanticipated dependencies and interruptions, creating downward-biased time and cost estimates."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Inside-view simulation compresses dependencies, handoffs, approvals, testing, procurement, and coordination overhead.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Early dates, budgets, or scope claims are becoming commitments rather than provisional estimates.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Early dates, budgets, or scope claims are becoming commitments rather than provisional estimates. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Early dates, budgets, or scope claims are becoming commitments rather than provisional estimates."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "Early dates, budgets, or scope claims are becoming commitments rather than provisional estimates."}, {"display_text": "Sponsor pressure rewards aggressive estimates or penalizes visible uncertainty.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Local knowledge is genuinely useful, but it is also the carrier of optimism, uniqueness claims, anchoring, and sponsor pressure; outside-view evidence is more corrective but can be rejected as insufficiently tailored. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Sponsor pressure rewards aggressive estimates or penalizes visible uncertainty. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Sponsor pressure rewards aggressive estimates or penalizes visible uncertainty.", "Local knowledge is genuinely useful, but it is also the carrier of optimism, uniqueness claims, anchoring, and sponsor pressure; outside-view evidence is more corrective but can be rejected as insufficiently tailored."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Sponsor pressure rewards aggressive estimates or penalizes visible uncertainty."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 53, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-053", "ledger_sha256": "c05f9cf1b35e77ac89d848372294a3772e220b983e4ad46fd6172c2fbf9c5418"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Reference-State Conservation Intervention", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:reference_state_conservation_intervention", "slug": "reference_state_conservation_intervention"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 3 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A valued object, record, state, practice, habitat, configuration, capability, or relationship is decaying away from a reference state that stakeholders judge worth preserving. Without intervention, loss compounds; with careless intervention, repair can erase provenance, authenticity, legitimate adaptation, or future interpretability. The system therefore needs a bounded conservation event rather than ordinary use, routine maintenance, or wholesale replacement.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A valued object, record, state, practice, habitat, configuration, capability, or relationship is decaying away from a reference state that stakeholders judge worth preserving. Without intervention, loss compounds; with careless intervention, repair can erase provenance, authenticity, legitimate adaptation, or future interpretability. The system therefore needs a bounded conservation event rather than ordinary use, routine maintenance, or wholesale replacement."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime requires a valued earlier reference and an identifiable decay trajectory moving the system away from it.", "role_mapping": "Reference state -> valued earlier condition; drift -> decay trajectory.", "slug": "conservation_event", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b054_a01_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A valued object, record, state, practice, habitat, configuration, capability, or relationship is decaying away from a reference state that stakeholders judge worth preserving. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A current state is measurably or visibly drifting away from a valued reference state.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A current state is measurably or visibly drifting away from a valued reference state.", "A valued object, record, state, practice, habitat, configuration, capability, or relationship is decaying away from a reference state that stakeholders judge worth preserving."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Conservation Event", "one_liner": "A deliberate, bounded intervention that arrests or reverses a system's decay away from a reference state judged worth preserving.", "page_ref": "prime:conservation_event", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Reference state -> valued earlier condition; drift -> decay trajectory.", "slug": "conservation_event", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime requires a valued earlier reference and an identifiable decay trajectory moving the system away from it."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A current state is measurably or visibly drifting away from a valued reference state.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A bounded conservation event can address reversible decay and need not itself threaten evidence.", "slug": "conservation_event"}], "residual_id": "r:reference_state_conservation_intervention:b054_a01_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b054_a01_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Without intervention, loss compounds; with careless intervention, repair can erase provenance, authenticity, legitimate adaptation, or future interpretability. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Delay increases irreversible loss, but intervention itself can create damage or overwrite evidence.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Delay increases irreversible loss, but intervention itself can create damage or overwrite evidence.", "Without intervention, loss compounds; with careless intervention, repair can erase provenance, authenticity, legitimate adaptation, or future interpretability."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A bounded conservation event can address reversible decay and need not itself threaten evidence.", "slug": "conservation_event"}], "normalized_requirement": "Delay increases irreversible loss, but intervention itself can create damage or overwrite evidence.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Delay increases irreversible loss, but intervention itself can create damage or overwrite evidence.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact prime permits a documented, inferred, or explicitly chosen reference and does not require contestation or uncertainty.", "slug": "conservation_event"}], "residual_id": "r:reference_state_conservation_intervention:b054_a01_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b054_a01_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A valued object, record, state, practice, habitat, configuration, capability, or relationship is decaying away from a reference state that stakeholders judge worth preserving. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The reference state is contested, uncertain, or only partially documented.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The reference state is contested, uncertain, or only partially documented.", "A valued object, record, state, practice, habitat, configuration, capability, or relationship is decaying away from a reference state that stakeholders judge worth preserving."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact prime permits a documented, inferred, or explicitly chosen reference and does not require contestation or uncertainty.", "slug": "conservation_event"}], "normalized_requirement": "The reference state is contested, uncertain, or only partially documented.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The reference state is contested, uncertain, or only partially documented.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The target of preservation has historical, evidentiary, functional, ecological, cultural, operational, or identity value.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The target of preservation has historical, evidentiary, functional, ecological, cultural, operational, or identity value. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The target of preservation has historical, evidentiary, functional, ecological, cultural, operational, or identity value."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "The target of preservation has historical, evidentiary, functional, ecological, cultural, operational, or identity value."}, {"display_text": "Routine maintenance has failed, been missed, or is insufficient to arrest decay.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The system therefore needs a bounded conservation event rather than ordinary use, routine maintenance, or wholesale replacement. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Routine maintenance has failed, been missed, or is insufficient to arrest decay. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Routine maintenance has failed, been missed, or is insufficient to arrest decay.", "The system therefore needs a bounded conservation event rather than ordinary use, routine maintenance, or wholesale replacement."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Routine maintenance has failed, been missed, or is insufficient to arrest decay."}, {"display_text": "The intervention requires stewardship decisions about what to restore, stabilize, leave untouched, replace, or document.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: The intervention requires stewardship decisions about what to restore, stabilize, leave untouched, replace, or document. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The intervention requires stewardship decisions about what to restore, stabilize, leave untouched, replace, or document."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The intervention requires stewardship decisions about what to restore, stabilize, leave untouched, replace, or document."}, {"display_text": "Post-intervention care is needed so the conserved state does not decay again immediately.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A valued object, record, state, practice, habitat, configuration, capability, or relationship is decaying away from a reference state that stakeholders judge worth preserving. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: Post-intervention care is needed so the conserved state does not decay again immediately. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Post-intervention care is needed so the conserved state does not decay again immediately.", "A valued object, record, state, practice, habitat, configuration, capability, or relationship is decaying away from a reference state that stakeholders judge worth preserving."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "Post-intervention care is needed so the conserved state does not decay again immediately."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 54, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-054", "ledger_sha256": "3b6633a4865c2bec7938a9f9d8d04f746006beebada612a5d2715e4332a2396c"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Reference Tracking Bandwidth Alignment", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:reference_tracking_bandwidth_alignment", "slug": "reference_tracking_bandwidth_alignment"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A control loop is assigned a reference trajectory whose update cadence, slew rate, volatility, or reversal frequency exceeds the loop’s effective tracking bandwidth, producing persistent error that cannot be eliminated by local effort alone.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A control loop is assigned a reference trajectory whose update cadence, slew rate, volatility, or reversal frequency exceeds the loop’s effective tracking bandwidth, producing persistent error that cannot be eliminated by local effort alone."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime is defined by a moving reference whose spectral content exceeds the tracker's finite bandwidth.", "role_mapping": "Changing target -> reference signal; implementers -> closed-loop tracker.", "slug": "reference_cadence_exceeds_tracking_bandwidth", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b054_a02_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The target, policy, forecast, setpoint, backlog, market signal, or priority list changes faster than implementers can observe and respond. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The target, policy, forecast, setpoint, backlog, market signal, or priority list changes faster than implementers can observe and respond."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Reference Cadence Exceeds Tracking Bandwidth", "one_liner": "When the signal a closed loop must track changes faster than the loop's bandwidth, persistent error follows that no amount of executor effort can close.", "page_ref": "prime:reference_cadence_exceeds_tracking_bandwidth", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Changing target -> reference signal; implementers -> closed-loop tracker.", "slug": "reference_cadence_exceeds_tracking_bandwidth", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime is defined by a moving reference whose spectral content exceeds the tracker's finite bandwidth."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The target, policy, forecast, setpoint, backlog, market signal, or priority list changes faster than implementers can observe and respond.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Delayed, smoothed, or batched feedback while the reference moves is an observable form of finite tracking bandwidth.", "role_mapping": "Late feedback -> loop response limit; moving target -> reference cadence.", "slug": "reference_cadence_exceeds_tracking_bandwidth", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b054_a02_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The reference generator can move in logical or political time, but the tracking loop moves in physical, cognitive, organizational, or computational time. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Feedback arrives late, noisy, smoothed, or batched while the reference continues to move.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Feedback arrives late, noisy, smoothed, or batched while the reference continues to move.", "The reference generator can move in logical or political time, but the tracking loop moves in physical, cognitive, organizational, or computational time."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Reference Cadence Exceeds Tracking Bandwidth", "one_liner": "When the signal a closed loop must track changes faster than the loop's bandwidth, persistent error follows that no amount of executor effort can close.", "page_ref": "prime:reference_cadence_exceeds_tracking_bandwidth", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Late feedback -> loop response limit; moving target -> reference cadence.", "slug": "reference_cadence_exceeds_tracking_bandwidth", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Delayed, smoothed, or batched feedback while the reference moves is an observable form of finite tracking bandwidth."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Feedback arrives late, noisy, smoothed, or batched while the reference continues to move.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires a finite response limit, including actuator saturation and stability margins.", "role_mapping": "Saturated teams or actuators -> finite tracking bandwidth.", "slug": "reference_cadence_exceeds_tracking_bandwidth", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b054_a02_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Actuators, teams, budgets, machines, or learners saturate before the demanded correction is complete. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Actuators, teams, budgets, machines, or learners saturate before the demanded correction is complete."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Reference Cadence Exceeds Tracking Bandwidth", "one_liner": "When the signal a closed loop must track changes faster than the loop's bandwidth, persistent error follows that no amount of executor effort can close.", "page_ref": "prime:reference_cadence_exceeds_tracking_bandwidth", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Saturated teams or actuators -> finite tracking bandwidth.", "slug": "reference_cadence_exceeds_tracking_bandwidth", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires a finite response limit, including actuator saturation and stability margins."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Actuators, teams, budgets, machines, or learners saturate before the demanded correction is complete.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Persistent lag and overshoot against an obsolete setpoint are the exact error signature of cadence exceeding bandwidth.", "role_mapping": "Stale correction -> phase lag; overcorrection -> overshoot.", "slug": "reference_cadence_exceeds_tracking_bandwidth", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b054_a02_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The system alternates between overcorrection and stale correction because each action targets an already-obsolete reference. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The system alternates between overcorrection and stale correction because each action targets an already-obsolete reference."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Reference Cadence Exceeds Tracking Bandwidth", "one_liner": "When the signal a closed loop must track changes faster than the loop's bandwidth, persistent error follows that no amount of executor effort can close.", "page_ref": "prime:reference_cadence_exceeds_tracking_bandwidth", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Stale correction -> phase lag; overcorrection -> overshoot.", "slug": "reference_cadence_exceeds_tracking_bandwidth", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Persistent lag and overshoot against an obsolete setpoint are the exact error signature of cadence exceeding bandwidth."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The system alternates between overcorrection and stale correction because each action targets an already-obsolete reference.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Management, scheduling, or automation treats residual tracking error as insufficient effort rather than insufficient bandwidth.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A control loop is assigned a reference trajectory whose update cadence, slew rate, volatility, or reversal frequency exceeds the loop’s effective tracking bandwidth, producing persistent error that cannot be eliminated by local effort alone. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Management, scheduling, or automation treats residual tracking error as insufficient effort rather than insufficient bandwidth. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Management, scheduling, or automation treats residual tracking error as insufficient effort rather than insufficient bandwidth.", "A control loop is assigned a reference trajectory whose update cadence, slew rate, volatility, or reversal frequency exceeds the loop’s effective tracking bandwidth, producing persistent error that cannot be eliminated by local effort alone."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Management, scheduling, or automation treats residual tracking error as insufficient effort rather than insufficient bandwidth."}, {"display_text": "The reference is externally imposed by an adversary, market, environment, or governance layer with little concern for local response time.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The reference generator can move in logical or political time, but the tracking loop moves in physical, cognitive, organizational, or computational time. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The reference is externally imposed by an adversary, market, environment, or governance layer with little concern for local response time. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The reference is externally imposed by an adversary, market, environment, or governance layer with little concern for local response time.", "The reference generator can move in logical or political time, but the tracking loop moves in physical, cognitive, organizational, or computational time."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The reference is externally imposed by an adversary, market, environment, or governance layer with little concern for local response time."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 54, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-054", "ledger_sha256": "3b6633a4865c2bec7938a9f9d8d04f746006beebada612a5d2715e4332a2396c"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Refinement Timing Guardrail", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:refinement_timing_guardrail", "slug": "refinement_timing_guardrail"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 6, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 6, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "6 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A local artifact, module, process step, model feature, interface, or decision surface is attractive to refine before the surrounding structure is known. The refinement consumes scarce search time and creates rigidity: people design around the polished local choice, interfaces harden, dependencies accumulate, switching costs rise, and later evidence may show that the optimized part was not the real constraint or did not belong in the final structure.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A local artifact, module, process step, model feature, interface, or decision surface is attractive to refine before the surrounding structure is known. The refinement consumes scarce search time and creates rigidity: people design around the polished local choice, interfaces harden, dependencies accumulate, switching costs rise, and later evidence may show that the optimized part was not the real constraint or did not belong in the final structure."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime begins with still-uncertain global structure, bottleneck, or requirements.", "role_mapping": "Uncertain architecture or need -> unsettled global shape.", "slug": "premature_optimization", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b054_a03_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Systems need enough quality to learn safely and credibly, but excessive local refinement before global structure is known converts uncertainty into rigidity and wastes the very search capacity needed to find the right structure. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A system is early enough that its architecture, demand pattern, user need, governing objective, workload, or integration structure is still uncertain.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A system is early enough that its architecture, demand pattern, user need, governing objective, workload, or integration structure is still uncertain.", "Systems need enough quality to learn safely and credibly, but excessive local refinement before global structure is known converts uncertainty into rigidity and wastes the very search capacity needed to find the right structure."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Premature Optimization", "one_liner": "Committing local refinement effort before global structure is known pays both search-cost and rigidity-cost without the information to spend either well.", "page_ref": "prime:premature_optimization", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Uncertain architecture or need -> unsettled global shape.", "slug": "premature_optimization", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime begins with still-uncertain global structure, bottleneck, or requirements."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A system is early enough that its architecture, demand pattern, user need, governing objective, workload, or integration structure is still uncertain.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime requires a localizable refinement that can produce a genuine local gain.", "role_mapping": "Measurable local part -> local refinement target.", "slug": "premature_optimization", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b054_a03_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The refinement consumes scarce search time and creates rigidity: people design around the polished local choice, interfaces harden, dependencies accumulate, switching costs rise, and later evidence may show that the optimized part was not the real constraint or did not belong in the final structure. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A local part is easier to measure, polish, or tune than the whole-system problem.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A local part is easier to measure, polish, or tune than the whole-system problem.", "The refinement consumes scarce search time and creates rigidity: people design around the polished local choice, interfaces harden, dependencies accumulate, switching costs rise, and later evidence may show that the optimized part was not the real constraint or did not belong in the final structure."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Premature Optimization", "one_liner": "Committing local refinement effort before global structure is known pays both search-cost and rigidity-cost without the information to spend either well.", "page_ref": "prime:premature_optimization", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Measurable local part -> local refinement target.", "slug": "premature_optimization", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime requires a localizable refinement that can produce a genuine local gain."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A local part is easier to measure, polish, or tune than the whole-system problem.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime requires refinement to raise commitment and lock-in costs while structure is unsettled.", "role_mapping": "Interface and sunk commitments -> refinement lock-in.", "slug": "premature_optimization", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b054_a03_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The refinement consumes scarce search time and creates rigidity: people design around the polished local choice, interfaces harden, dependencies accumulate, switching costs rise, and later evidence may show that the optimized part was not the real constraint or did not belong in the final structure. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The refinement would create interface commitments, dependency commitments, sunk costs, reputational expectations, or future switching costs.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The refinement would create interface commitments, dependency commitments, sunk costs, reputational expectations, or future switching costs.", "The refinement consumes scarce search time and creates rigidity: people design around the polished local choice, interfaces harden, dependencies accumulate, switching costs rise, and later evidence may show that the optimized part was not the real constraint or did not belong in the final structure."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Premature Optimization", "one_liner": "Committing local refinement effort before global structure is known pays both search-cost and rigidity-cost without the information to spend either well.", "page_ref": "prime:premature_optimization", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Interface and sunk commitments -> refinement lock-in.", "slug": "premature_optimization", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime requires refinement to raise commitment and lock-in costs while structure is unsettled."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The refinement would create interface commitments, dependency commitments, sunk costs, reputational expectations, or future switching costs.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Missing representative end-to-end information leaves the global structure and critical path unknown.", "role_mapping": "Unavailable workload evidence -> insufficient structural information.", "slug": "premature_optimization", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b054_a03_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Representative workload, user evidence, production data, or end-to-end process information is not yet available. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Representative workload, user evidence, production data, or end-to-end process information is not yet available."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Premature Optimization", "one_liner": "Committing local refinement effort before global structure is known pays both search-cost and rigidity-cost without the information to spend either well.", "page_ref": "prime:premature_optimization", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Unavailable workload evidence -> insufficient structural information.", "slug": "premature_optimization", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Missing representative end-to-end information leaves the global structure and critical path unknown."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Representative workload, user evidence, production data, or end-to-end process information is not yet available.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact frequency-cost invariant permits real local gains with near-zero end-to-end value when the critical path is unknown.", "role_mapping": "Local metric gain -> local refinement; unvalidated whole -> frequency cost.", "slug": "premature_optimization", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b054_a03_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A local metric can improve while whole-system success remains unvalidated or ambiguous. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A local metric can improve while whole-system success remains unvalidated or ambiguous."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Premature Optimization", "one_liner": "Committing local refinement effort before global structure is known pays both search-cost and rigidity-cost without the information to spend either well.", "page_ref": "prime:premature_optimization", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Local metric gain -> local refinement; unvalidated whole -> frequency cost.", "slug": "premature_optimization", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact frequency-cost invariant permits real local gains with near-zero end-to-end value when the critical path is unknown."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A local metric can improve while whole-system success remains unvalidated or ambiguous.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Scaling, caching, automating, or hardening before stable variation is known is tuning before search has settled structure.", "role_mapping": "Early hardening -> inverted search/tune order.", "slug": "premature_optimization", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b054_a03_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: There is pressure to scale, abstract, generalize, cache, automate, or harden before the stable variation pattern is known. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["There is pressure to scale, abstract, generalize, cache, automate, or harden before the stable variation pattern is known."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Premature Optimization", "one_liner": "Committing local refinement effort before global structure is known pays both search-cost and rigidity-cost without the information to spend either well.", "page_ref": "prime:premature_optimization", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Early hardening -> inverted search/tune order.", "slug": "premature_optimization", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Scaling, caching, automating, or hardening before stable variation is known is tuning before search has settled structure."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "There is pressure to scale, abstract, generalize, cache, automate, or harden before the stable variation pattern is known.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Participants are rewarded for visible technical elegance, speed, accuracy, automation, or polish before global learning is complete.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Systems need enough quality to learn safely and credibly, but excessive local refinement before global structure is known converts uncertainty into rigidity and wastes the very search capacity needed to find the right structure. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Participants are rewarded for visible technical elegance, speed, accuracy, automation, or polish before global learning is complete. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Participants are rewarded for visible technical elegance, speed, accuracy, automation, or polish before global learning is complete.", "Systems need enough quality to learn safely and credibly, but excessive local refinement before global structure is known converts uncertainty into rigidity and wastes the very search capacity needed to find the right structure."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Participants are rewarded for visible technical elegance, speed, accuracy, automation, or polish before global learning is complete."}, {"display_text": "Deferring refinement is socially hard because roughness looks unprofessional, even when roughness preserves learning velocity.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Systems need enough quality to learn safely and credibly, but excessive local refinement before global structure is known converts uncertainty into rigidity and wastes the very search capacity needed to find the right structure. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Deferring refinement is socially hard because roughness looks unprofessional, even when roughness preserves learning velocity. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Deferring refinement is socially hard because roughness looks unprofessional, even when roughness preserves learning velocity.", "Systems need enough quality to learn safely and credibly, but excessive local refinement before global structure is known converts uncertainty into rigidity and wastes the very search capacity needed to find the right structure."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 8, "text": "Deferring refinement is socially hard because roughness looks unprofessional, even when roughness preserves learning velocity."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 54, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-054", "ledger_sha256": "3b6633a4865c2bec7938a9f9d8d04f746006beebada612a5d2715e4332a2396c"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Reflexive Forecast Impact Governance", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:reflexive_forecast_impact_governance", "slug": "reflexive_forecast_impact_governance"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A forecast, warning, projection, poll, risk estimate, demand estimate, capacity notice, or predictive score becomes known to actors who can act on it, and their action changes the conditions the forecast described. The observed outcome can then make the forecast appear false even when the forecast was causally important.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A forecast, warning, projection, poll, risk estimate, demand estimate, capacity notice, or predictive score becomes known to actors who can act on it, and their action changes the conditions the forecast described. The observed outcome can then make the forecast appear false even when the forecast was causally important."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime requires dissemination of a forecast to responsive actors able to move the predicted variable.", "role_mapping": "Observable forecast -> dissemination; participants -> responsive population.", "slug": "self_defeating_prediction", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b054_a04_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The forecast concerns a social, organizational, market, operational, or safety system whose participants can observe and respond to the forecast. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The forecast concerns a social, organizational, market, operational, or safety system whose participants can observe and respond to the forecast."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Self-Defeating Prediction", "one_liner": "Belief in a forecast moves conditions against it.", "page_ref": "prime:self_defeating_prediction", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Observable forecast -> dissemination; participants -> responsive population.", "slug": "self_defeating_prediction", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime requires dissemination of a forecast to responsive actors able to move the predicted variable."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The forecast concerns a social, organizational, market, operational, or safety system whose participants can observe and respond to the forecast.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Belief-driven response is mandatory, but it need not arise from an explicit incentive or duty and may be automatic.", "slug": "self_defeating_prediction"}], "residual_id": "r:reflexive_forecast_impact_governance:b054_a04_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b054_a04_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Recipients have incentives or duties to avoid, exploit, game, mobilize around, delay, accelerate, or coordinate against the predicted outcome. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Recipients have incentives or duties to avoid, exploit, game, mobilize around, delay, accelerate, or coordinate against the predicted outcome."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Belief-driven response is mandatory, but it need not arise from an explicit incentive or duty and may be automatic.", "slug": "self_defeating_prediction"}], "normalized_requirement": "Recipients have incentives or duties to avoid, exploit, game, mobilize around, delay, accelerate, or coordinate against the predicted outcome.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Recipients have incentives or duties to avoid, exploit, game, mobilize around, delay, accelerate, or coordinate against the predicted outcome.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Dissemination scope is a lever because routing the forecast through belief changes target conditions.", "role_mapping": "Audience and channel -> dissemination; changed behavior -> belief-action coupling.", "slug": "self_defeating_prediction", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b054_a04_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A forecast, warning, projection, poll, risk estimate, demand estimate, capacity notice, or predictive score becomes known to actors who can act on it, and their action changes the conditions the forecast described. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Publication timing, audience scope, framing, or channel choice changes the behavior of the system being forecast.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Publication timing, audience scope, framing, or channel choice changes the behavior of the system being forecast.", "A forecast, warning, projection, poll, risk estimate, demand estimate, capacity notice, or predictive score becomes known to actors who can act on it, and their action changes the conditions the forecast described."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Self-Defeating Prediction", "one_liner": "Belief in a forecast moves conditions against it.", "page_ref": "prime:self_defeating_prediction", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Audience and channel -> dissemination; changed behavior -> belief-action coupling.", "slug": "self_defeating_prediction", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Dissemination scope is a lever because routing the forecast through belief changes target conditions."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Publication timing, audience scope, framing, or channel choice changes the behavior of the system being forecast.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The reflexive loop compares forecast with realization, but decision-makers need not make the stated raw-match evaluation error.", "slug": "self_defeating_prediction"}], "residual_id": "r:reflexive_forecast_impact_governance:b054_a04_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b054_a04_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The observed outcome can then make the forecast appear false even when the forecast was causally important. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Decision-makers may later judge forecast quality by raw outcome matching without accounting for response-induced changes.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Decision-makers may later judge forecast quality by raw outcome matching without accounting for response-induced changes.", "The observed outcome can then make the forecast appear false even when the forecast was causally important."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The reflexive loop compares forecast with realization, but decision-makers need not make the stated raw-match evaluation error.", "slug": "self_defeating_prediction"}], "normalized_requirement": "Decision-makers may later judge forecast quality by raw outcome matching without accounting for response-induced changes.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Decision-makers may later judge forecast quality by raw outcome matching without accounting for response-induced changes.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A prediction need not be disclosed or cause preventive action, so an avoided event is not mandatory.", "slug": "foreseeing_prediction"}], "residual_id": "r:reflexive_forecast_impact_governance:b054_a04_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b054_a04_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The observed outcome can then make the forecast appear false even when the forecast was causally important. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A beneficial warning could look like a false alarm if the avoided bad outcome is not represented counterfactually.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A beneficial warning could look like a false alarm if the avoided bad outcome is not represented counterfactually.", "The observed outcome can then make the forecast appear false even when the forecast was causally important."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A prediction need not be disclosed or cause preventive action, so an avoided event is not mandatory.", "slug": "foreseeing_prediction"}], "normalized_requirement": "A beneficial warning could look like a false alarm if the avoided bad outcome is not represented counterfactually.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A beneficial warning could look like a false alarm if the avoided bad outcome is not represented counterfactually.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P092-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a disclosed signal, a plurality of exposed actors, and their response capability.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A disclosure reaches multiple actors who are capable of acting on it.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail the disclosure as a possible causal contributor to the response, not merely a coincident announcement.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The disclosure can induce behavior by the exposed actors.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve coordinated, clustered, or simultaneous response rather than one isolated actor's behavior.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The induced behavior is synchronized across multiple actors.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the source's 'could induce' modality.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The synchronized response is possible rather than inevitable.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve harmful impact rather than benign coordinated action.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The synchronized response is harmful.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "A harmful disclosure can induce synchronized harmful behavior among multiple exposed actors.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "harmful disclosure can trigger synchronized crowd response", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P092-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact prime requires movement against the forecast; synchronized hoarding or panic may instead amplify it.", "slug": "self_defeating_prediction"}], "residual_id": "r:reflexive_forecast_impact_governance:b054_a04_c7", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b054_a04_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A harmful disclosure could induce synchronized behavior such as hoarding, stampedes, panic selling, premature abandonment, or thundering-herd contention. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A harmful disclosure could induce synchronized behavior such as hoarding, stampedes, panic selling, premature abandonment, or thundering-herd contention."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact prime requires movement against the forecast; synchronized hoarding or panic may instead amplify it.", "slug": "self_defeating_prediction"}], "normalized_requirement": "A harmful disclosure could induce synchronized behavior such as hoarding, stampedes, panic selling, premature abandonment, or thundering-herd contention.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A harmful disclosure could induce synchronized behavior such as hoarding, stampedes, panic selling, premature abandonment, or thundering-herd contention.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The forecast is used as a warning, alert, poll, target, public estimate, capacity signal, or risk communication rather than only as private analysis.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A forecast, warning, projection, poll, risk estimate, demand estimate, capacity notice, or predictive score becomes known to actors who can act on it, and their action changes the conditions the forecast described. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The forecast is used as a warning, alert, poll, target, public estimate, capacity signal, or risk communication rather than only as private analysis. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The forecast is used as a warning, alert, poll, target, public estimate, capacity signal, or risk communication rather than only as private analysis.", "A forecast, warning, projection, poll, risk estimate, demand estimate, capacity notice, or predictive score becomes known to actors who can act on it, and their action changes the conditions the forecast described."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The forecast is used as a warning, alert, poll, target, public estimate, capacity signal, or risk communication rather than only as private analysis."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 54, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-054", "ledger_sha256": "3b6633a4865c2bec7938a9f9d8d04f746006beebada612a5d2715e4332a2396c"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Reflexive Rule-Binding Governance", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:reflexive_rule_binding_governance", "slug": "reflexive_rule_binding_governance"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 5, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system has governing rules, but some actors, roles, authorities, subsystems, or emergency paths can act as if they are outside those rules. The result is not simply unfairness; it is a structural break in which rule application depends on identity, rank, discretionary power, or proximity to enforcement rather than on the rules themselves. Once the rule-making or rule-enforcing element is exempt, every downstream decision becomes vulnerable to decree, favoritism, arbitrary exception, selective enforcement, and legitimacy collapse.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system has governing rules, but some actors, roles, authorities, subsystems, or emergency paths can act as if they are outside those rules. The result is not simply unfairness; it is a structural break in which rule application depends on identity, rank, discretionary power, or proximity to enforcement rather than on the rules themselves. Once the rule-making or rule-enforcing element is exempt, every downstream decision becomes vulnerable to decree, favoritism, arbitrary exception, selective enforcement, and legitimacy collapse."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a rule body and entities declared within its scope.", "role_mapping": "Rule or protocol -> rule body; population -> entities in scope.", "slug": "rule_of_law", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b054_a05_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A rule, policy, law, standard, protocol, invariant, or governance charter is supposed to apply to a defined population or system scope. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A rule, policy, law, standard, protocol, invariant, or governance charter is supposed to apply to a defined population or system scope."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Rule of Law", "one_liner": "No element of a system is exempt from its governing rules, including the element that generates or enforces them.", "page_ref": "prime:rule_of_law", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Rule or protocol -> rule body; population -> entities in scope.", "slug": "rule_of_law", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a rule body and entities declared within its scope."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A rule, policy, law, standard, protocol, invariant, or governance charter is supposed to apply to a defined population or system scope.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Reflexive coverage of the rule-generating and enforcing element is the prime's defining closure condition.", "role_mapping": "Authority -> rule source and enforcer; self-binding -> reflexive coverage.", "slug": "rule_of_law", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b054_a05_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A rule system needs authority to interpret, enforce, amend, and sometimes suspend rules, but unconstrained authority can become an exemption engine that destroys the rule-bound character of the system. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The authority that writes, interprets, enforces, or waives the rule can affect whether the rule binds itself.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The authority that writes, interprets, enforces, or waives the rule can affect whether the rule binds itself.", "A rule system needs authority to interpret, enforce, amend, and sometimes suspend rules, but unconstrained authority can become an exemption engine that destroys the rule-bound character of the system."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Rule of Law", "one_liner": "No element of a system is exempt from its governing rules, including the element that generates or enforces them.", "page_ref": "prime:rule_of_law", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Authority -> rule source and enforcer; self-binding -> reflexive coverage.", "slug": "rule_of_law", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Reflexive coverage of the rule-generating and enforcing element is the prime's defining closure condition."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The authority that writes, interprets, enforces, or waives the rule can affect whether the rule binds itself.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires exceptions themselves to be narrow, public, justified, and rule-bound.", "role_mapping": "Override powers -> exceptions; criteria and review -> rule-bound exception.", "slug": "no_one_is_above_the_rules", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b054_a05_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The result is not simply unfairness; it is a structural break in which rule application depends on identity, rank, discretionary power, or proximity to enforcement rather than on the rules themselves. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Emergency, override, waiver, or exception powers exist but are not themselves bounded by public criteria, logging, review, and sunset rules.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Emergency, override, waiver, or exception powers exist but are not themselves bounded by public criteria, logging, review, and sunset rules.", "The result is not simply unfairness; it is a structural break in which rule application depends on identity, rank, discretionary power, or proximity to enforcement rather than on the rules themselves."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "No One Is Above the Rules", "one_liner": "Universal accountability.", "page_ref": "prime:no_one_is_above_the_rules", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Override powers -> exceptions; criteria and review -> rule-bound exception.", "slug": "no_one_is_above_the_rules", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires exceptions themselves to be narrow, public, justified, and rule-bound."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Emergency, override, waiver, or exception powers exist but are not themselves bounded by public criteria, logging, review, and sunset rules.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Symmetric applicability across ranks and equivalent cases is mandatory in the exact record.", "role_mapping": "Roles and cases -> entities in scope; equivalent treatment -> symmetric application.", "slug": "no_one_is_above_the_rules", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b054_a05_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The result is not simply unfairness; it is a structural break in which rule application depends on identity, rank, discretionary power, or proximity to enforcement rather than on the rules themselves. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A rule is used across multiple cases, roles, sites, components, time periods, or identity groups and must preserve equivalent treatment under equivalent conditions.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A rule is used across multiple cases, roles, sites, components, time periods, or identity groups and must preserve equivalent treatment under equivalent conditions.", "The result is not simply unfairness; it is a structural break in which rule application depends on identity, rank, discretionary power, or proximity to enforcement rather than on the rules themselves."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "No One Is Above the Rules", "one_liner": "Universal accountability.", "page_ref": "prime:no_one_is_above_the_rules", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Roles and cases -> entities in scope; equivalent treatment -> symmetric application.", "slug": "no_one_is_above_the_rules", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Symmetric applicability across ranks and equivalent cases is mandatory in the exact record."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A rule is used across multiple cases, roles, sites, components, time periods, or identity groups and must preserve equivalent treatment under equivalent conditions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime generalizes to formal systems and requires operators and meta-level rule sources to remain in scope.", "role_mapping": "Operators and root accounts -> rule-source elements; meta-rules -> governing rule body.", "slug": "rule_of_law", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b054_a05_c8", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A formal or computational system must ensure that operators, administrative APIs, root accounts, self-modifying rules, or meta-rules are also constrained. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A formal or computational system must ensure that operators, administrative APIs, root accounts, self-modifying rules, or meta-rules are also constrained."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Rule of Law", "one_liner": "No element of a system is exempt from its governing rules, including the element that generates or enforces them.", "page_ref": "prime:rule_of_law", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Operators and root accounts -> rule-source elements; meta-rules -> governing rule body.", "slug": "rule_of_law", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime generalizes to formal systems and requires operators and meta-level rule sources to remain in scope."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A formal or computational system must ensure that operators, administrative APIs, root accounts, self-modifying rules, or meta-rules are also constrained.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [8], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "High-status actors, administrators, owners, model operators, executives, moderators, or controllers appear to receive different treatment from ordinary subjects.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: High-status actors, administrators, owners, model operators, executives, moderators, or controllers appear to receive different treatment from ordinary subjects. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["High-status actors, administrators, owners, model operators, executives, moderators, or controllers appear to receive different treatment from ordinary subjects."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "High-status actors, administrators, owners, model operators, executives, moderators, or controllers appear to receive different treatment from ordinary subjects."}, {"display_text": "A system needs legitimacy, predictability, or safety because actors must be able to know in advance which rules apply.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system has governing rules, but some actors, roles, authorities, subsystems, or emergency paths can act as if they are outside those rules. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: A system needs legitimacy, predictability, or safety because actors must be able to know in advance which rules apply. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A system needs legitimacy, predictability, or safety because actors must be able to know in advance which rules apply.", "A system has governing rules, but some actors, roles, authorities, subsystems, or emergency paths can act as if they are outside those rules."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "A system needs legitimacy, predictability, or safety because actors must be able to know in advance which rules apply."}, {"display_text": "The system must distinguish lawful discretion from privileged exemption.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: The system must distinguish lawful discretion from privileged exemption. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The system must distinguish lawful discretion from privileged exemption."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "The system must distinguish lawful discretion from privileged exemption."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 54, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-054", "ledger_sha256": "3b6633a4865c2bec7938a9f9d8d04f746006beebada612a5d2715e4332a2396c"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Reflexive Self-Monitoring", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:reflexive_self_monitoring", "slug": "reflexive_self_monitoring"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 3 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is self-blind repetition. A system affects itself over time, but it lacks a usable representation of its own behavior, state, decision process, or contribution to outcomes. Because the pattern remains invisible or poorly represented, the actor treats each episode as isolated, blames the wrong cause, or repeats the same ineffective correction.\n\nThe failure is often not ignorance of final outcomes. A team may know deadlines are missed, a student may know answers are wrong, a service may know incidents recur, and an organization may know people are dissatisfied. What is missing is a usable view of the process that creates those outcomes.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "The system or actor affects itself over time but lacks a usable representation of its own behavior, state, pattern, or decision process, so harmful routines, blind spots, drift, and repeated mistakes persist."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Metacognition requires an actual second-order representation and control signal, not inability to describe one.", "slug": "metacognition"}], "residual_id": "r:reflexive_self_monitoring:b054_a06_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b054_a06_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "What is missing is a usable view of the process that creates those outcomes. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: People can describe outcomes but cannot describe the habits, process choices, triggers, or decisions that keep producing those outcomes.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["People can describe outcomes but cannot describe the habits, process choices, triggers, or decisions that keep producing those outcomes.", "What is missing is a usable view of the process that creates those outcomes."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Metacognition requires an actual second-order representation and control signal, not inability to describe one.", "slug": "metacognition"}], "normalized_requirement": "People can describe outcomes but cannot describe the habits, process choices, triggers, or decisions that keep producing those outcomes.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "People can describe outcomes but cannot describe the habits, process choices, triggers, or decisions that keep producing those outcomes.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime requires a second-order representation of one's cognition that monitors uncertainty, strategy, progress, or quality and drives control.", "role_mapping": "Recognized uncertainty and strategy -> meta-level monitoring; learning adaptation -> control action.", "slug": "metacognition", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b054_a06_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when the same person, team, organization, or system both contributes to the pattern and has some ability to change its future behavior. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Learning, adaptation, or behavior change depends on recognizing one's own uncertainty, strategy, progress, or deviation.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Learning, adaptation, or behavior change depends on recognizing one's own uncertainty, strategy, progress, or deviation.", "Use this archetype when the same person, team, organization, or system both contributes to the pattern and has some ability to change its future behavior."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Metacognition", "one_liner": "Awareness of thinking processes.", "page_ref": "prime:metacognition", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Recognized uncertainty and strategy -> meta-level monitoring; learning adaptation -> control action.", "slug": "metacognition", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime requires a second-order representation of one's cognition that monitors uncertainty, strategy, progress, or quality and drives control."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Learning, adaptation, or behavior change depends on recognizing one's own uncertainty, strategy, progress, or deviation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Reflexivity can use internally generated representation and does not require any external monitor or ownership failure.", "slug": "reflexivity_self_reference"}], "residual_id": "r:reflexive_self_monitoring:b054_a06_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b054_a06_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: External monitoring exists but the monitored actor does not own or use the evidence. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["External monitoring exists but the monitored actor does not own or use the evidence."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Reflexivity can use internally generated representation and does not require any external monitor or ownership failure.", "slug": "reflexivity_self_reference"}], "normalized_requirement": "External monitoring exists but the monitored actor does not own or use the evidence.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "External monitoring exists but the monitored actor does not own or use the evidence.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The actor repeatedly encounters the same failure, conflict, lapse, delay, confusion, or drift.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The system or actor affects itself over time but lacks a usable representation of its own behavior, state, pattern, or decision process, so harmful routines, blind spots, drift, and repeated mistakes persist. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The actor repeatedly encounters the same failure, conflict, lapse, delay, confusion, or drift. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The actor repeatedly encounters the same failure, conflict, lapse, delay, confusion, or drift.", "The system or actor affects itself over time but lacks a usable representation of its own behavior, state, pattern, or decision process, so harmful routines, blind spots, drift, and repeated mistakes persist."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "The actor repeatedly encounters the same failure, conflict, lapse, delay, confusion, or drift."}, {"display_text": "A team or organization wants to improve its operating process but relies on anecdote, blame, heroic effort, or after-the-fact rationalization.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when the same person, team, organization, or system both contributes to the pattern and has some ability to change its future behavior. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: A team or organization wants to improve its operating process but relies on anecdote, blame, heroic effort, or after-the-fact rationalization. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A team or organization wants to improve its operating process but relies on anecdote, blame, heroic effort, or after-the-fact rationalization.", "Use this archetype when the same person, team, organization, or system both contributes to the pattern and has some ability to change its future behavior."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "A team or organization wants to improve its operating process but relies on anecdote, blame, heroic effort, or after-the-fact rationalization."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 54, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-054", "ledger_sha256": "3b6633a4865c2bec7938a9f9d8d04f746006beebada612a5d2715e4332a2396c"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Regime Map Navigation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:regime_map_navigation", "slug": "regime_map_navigation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 3 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural failure is regime blindness. Actors compress several qualitatively different operating situations into one average model, one dashboard threshold, or one policy. Evidence from one region is extrapolated into another where constraints, feedback, dominant mechanisms, or response functions differ. Disagreement then appears personal even when people are implicitly reasoning from different regime classifications.\nTransition zones concentrate risk. Measurements are noisy, boundaries may move, and path dependence means entry and exit do not occur at the same condition. If policy switches on one crisp reading, the system chatters. If it waits for certainty, preparation may arrive after an irreversible crossing. A useful solution must therefore govern uncertainty and direction, not merely draw colored regions after the fact.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "System behavior and intervention effectiveness change qualitatively across operating regimes, but current decisions apply one model or policy across those boundaries."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "This branch preserves the complete remedy-free diagnostic route; goals, feasibility clauses, gates, deployment constraints, and supporting context remain outside the DNF."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "EXT001-C078", "dnf": [["EXT001-U078-O1"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"obligation_id": "EXT001-U078-O1", "predicate": "Dominant mechanisms, constraints, or response functions change qualitatively across observable operating conditions."}], "predicate": "Dominant mechanisms, constraints, or response functions change qualitatively across observable operating conditions.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Dominant mechanisms, constraints, or response functions change qualitatively across observable operating conditions.", "unit_id": "EXT001-U078"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"catalog_exhaustion": "CONDITION_LEVEL", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Dominant mechanisms, constraints, or response functions change qualitatively across observable operating conditions.", "slug": "scaling_and_scale_dependence"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Dominant mechanisms, constraints, or response functions change qualitatively across observable operating conditions.", "slug": "robustness"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Dominant mechanisms, constraints, or response functions change qualitatively across observable operating conditions.", "slug": "metasystem_transition"}], "residual_id": "EXT001:regime_map_navigation:C01", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding."}}, "condition_id": "ext001_regime_map_navigation_a01", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored structural_problem, prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: Dominant mechanisms, constraints, or response functions change qualitatively across observable operating conditions.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Dominant mechanisms, constraints, or response functions change qualitatively across observable operating conditions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Dominant mechanisms, constraints, or response functions change qualitatively across observable operating conditions.", "slug": "scaling_and_scale_dependence"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Dominant mechanisms, constraints, or response functions change qualitatively across observable operating conditions.", "slug": "robustness"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Dominant mechanisms, constraints, or response functions change qualitatively across observable operating conditions.", "slug": "metasystem_transition"}], "normalized_requirement": "Dominant mechanisms, constraints, or response functions change qualitatively across observable operating conditions.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Dominant mechanisms, constraints, or response functions change qualitatively across observable operating conditions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Every extrapolation-beyond-regime instance applies one calibrated apparatus outside the conditions that warranted it, directly entailing cross-regime extrapolation of one model or policy.", "role_mapping": "The calibrated apparatus maps to the model, threshold, or policy; the sampled and deployment regimes map to the different operating regimes.", "slug": "extrapolation_beyond_sampled_regime", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "ext001_regime_map_navigation_a02", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored structural_problem, prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: A single average model, threshold, or policy is being extrapolated across those regimes.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A single average model, threshold, or policy is being extrapolated across those regimes."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Extrapolation Beyond Sampled Regime", "one_liner": "A calibrated apparatus is deployed against inputs outside the regime its calibration was established in, while continuing to report the same confidence indicators it would report inside the regime, so its own self-reporting is structurally blind to the regime exit.", "page_ref": "prime:extrapolation_beyond_sampled_regime", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "The calibrated apparatus maps to the model, threshold, or policy; the sampled and deployment regimes map to the different operating regimes.", "slug": "extrapolation_beyond_sampled_regime", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Every extrapolation-beyond-regime instance applies one calibrated apparatus outside the conditions that warranted it, directly entailing cross-regime extrapolation of one model or policy."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A single average model, threshold, or policy is being extrapolated across those regimes.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "EXT001-C079", "dnf": [["EXT001-U079-O1"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"obligation_id": "EXT001-U079-O1", "predicate": "Transition boundaries are uncertain, moving, or path-dependent."}], "predicate": "Transition boundaries are uncertain, moving, or path-dependent.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Transition boundaries are uncertain, moving, or path-dependent.", "unit_id": "EXT001-U079"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"catalog_exhaustion": "CONDITION_LEVEL", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Transition boundaries are uncertain, moving, or path-dependent.", "slug": "critical_juncture"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Transition boundaries are uncertain, moving, or path-dependent.", "slug": "desire_path"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Transition boundaries are uncertain, moving, or path-dependent.", "slug": "topographic_forcing"}], "residual_id": "EXT001:regime_map_navigation:C03", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding."}}, "condition_id": "ext001_regime_map_navigation_a03", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored structural_problem, prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: Transition boundaries are uncertain, moving, or path-dependent.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Transition boundaries are uncertain, moving, or path-dependent."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Transition boundaries are uncertain, moving, or path-dependent.", "slug": "critical_juncture"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Transition boundaries are uncertain, moving, or path-dependent.", "slug": "desire_path"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Transition boundaries are uncertain, moving, or path-dependent.", "slug": "topographic_forcing"}], "normalized_requirement": "Transition boundaries are uncertain, moving, or path-dependent.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Transition boundaries are uncertain, moving, or path-dependent.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Condition variables can be observed soon enough to change action.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored structural_problem, prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: Condition variables can be observed soon enough to change action. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Condition variables can be observed soon enough to change action.", "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored structural_problem, prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Condition variables can be observed soon enough to change action."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"candidate_ledger_sha256": "96f72d2139077fd57bf795048ebef33b3fd574b20963170080ec916b5b3b92fe", "extension_id": "new-archetypes-extension-001", "ledger_id": "prime-production-v1.2-extension-001", "ledger_sha256": "9644520614744632d1d36da44b1acd77ce432852c6083eb871203521c166efce"}, "base_projection_sha256": "841e0c7f3cb8e8054475ad29a8a14745a416b4fc115559a44878b94292e673ec", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "ca09ed9fe1598ce7072755b530de5553f5ee0a7cd64ae82d9e4a4e2149a37788", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Regime-Shift Impact Boundary Characterization", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:regime_shift_impact_boundary_characterization", "slug": "regime_shift_impact_boundary_characterization"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 4 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system has shifted, or may soon shift, into a qualitatively different operating regime, but decision makers cannot tell which parts of the broader system are directly affected, which are indirectly exposed, which will experience cascading consequences, and which remain outside the material impact boundary.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system has shifted, or may soon shift, into a qualitatively different operating regime, but decision makers cannot tell which parts of the broader system are directly affected, which are indirectly exposed, which will experience cascading consequences, and which remain outside the material impact boundary."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime is a threshold-driven discontinuous flip to a qualitatively different operating regime with regime-specific causal rules.", "role_mapping": "Threshold crossing -> tipping point; changed dynamics -> new attractor regime.", "slug": "regime_change", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b054_a07_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A threshold crossing, phase transition, policy change, market break, ecological collapse, infrastructure failure, or operating-model change alters the governing dynamics of a system. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A threshold crossing, phase transition, policy change, market break, ecological collapse, infrastructure failure, or operating-model change alters the governing dynamics of a system."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Regime Change", "one_liner": "A discontinuous flip of a system from one stable operating regime to a qualitatively different one, where the same inputs produce fundamentally different responses on either side of a feedback-driven threshold.", "page_ref": "prime:regime_change", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Threshold crossing -> tipping point; changed dynamics -> new attractor regime.", "slug": "regime_change", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime is a threshold-driven discontinuous flip to a qualitatively different operating regime with regime-specific causal rules."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A threshold crossing, phase transition, policy change, market break, ecological collapse, infrastructure failure, or operating-model change alters the governing dynamics of a system.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A regime can change within one bounded system without uncertain downstream or cross-scale consequences.", "slug": "regime_change"}], "residual_id": "r:regime_shift_impact_boundary_characterization:b054_a07_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b054_a07_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system has shifted, or may soon shift, into a qualitatively different operating regime, but decision makers cannot tell which parts of the broader system are directly affected, which are indirectly exposed, which will experience cascading consequences, and which remain outside the material impact boundary. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Local effects are visible, but downstream, cross-scale, cross-boundary, or delayed impacts remain uncertain.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Local effects are visible, but downstream, cross-scale, cross-boundary, or delayed impacts remain uncertain.", "A system has shifted, or may soon shift, into a qualitatively different operating regime, but decision makers cannot tell which parts of the broader system are directly affected, which are indirectly exposed, which will experience cascading consequences, and which remain outside the material impact boundary."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A regime can change within one bounded system without uncertain downstream or cross-scale consequences.", "slug": "regime_change"}], "normalized_requirement": "Local effects are visible, but downstream, cross-scale, cross-boundary, or delayed impacts remain uncertain.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Local effects are visible, but downstream, cross-scale, cross-boundary, or delayed impacts remain uncertain.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P092-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a monitoring process, a monitored system, and successful shift detection.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An existing monitoring system detects that a system has entered or is entering a regime shift.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve shift consequences and a propagation extent or impact-boundary role.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The shift has consequences that may propagate across a broader system.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail missing propagation-extent information despite successful shift detection.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Monitoring does not determine how far those consequences propagate.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Existing monitoring detects a regime shift but does not determine how far its consequences propagate.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "shift detection lacks consequence-propagation extent", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P092-C10-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P092-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a monitoring process, a monitored system, and successful shift detection.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An existing monitoring system detects that a system has entered or is entering a regime shift.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a response-boundary role tied to the detected shift.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Decision makers require a perimeter defining which parts of the broader system warrant response.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail absence of response-boundary guidance despite successful shift detection.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Monitoring does not determine the warranted response perimeter.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve justified impact-based scope, not any arbitrary administrative boundary.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The missing perimeter is the one warranted by the shift's material consequences.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Existing monitoring detects a regime shift but does not determine what response perimeter is warranted.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "shift detection lacks a warranted response perimeter", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P092-C10-U2"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact prime does not require monitoring or a geographic or organizational response perimeter.", "slug": "regime_change"}], "residual_id": "r:regime_shift_impact_boundary_characterization:b054_a07_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b054_a07_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Regime shifts are discontinuous, but response capacity is finite; the intervention must widen attention enough to catch cascades while drawing boundaries precise enough to prioritize action. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Existing monitoring detects the shift but does not say how far consequences propagate or what response perimeter is warranted.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Existing monitoring detects the shift but does not say how far consequences propagate or what response perimeter is warranted.", "Regime shifts are discontinuous, but response capacity is finite; the intervention must widen attention enough to catch cascades while drawing boundaries precise enough to prioritize action."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 2, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 2}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact prime does not require monitoring or a geographic or organizational response perimeter.", "slug": "regime_change"}], "normalized_requirement": "Existing monitoring detects the shift but does not say how far consequences propagate or what response perimeter is warranted.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 2 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Existing monitoring detects the shift but does not say how far consequences propagate or what response perimeter is warranted.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Regime change requires feedback-driven thresholds but not propagation through multiple subsystems or shared exposure.", "slug": "regime_change"}], "residual_id": "r:regime_shift_impact_boundary_characterization:b054_a07_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b054_a07_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system has shifted, or may soon shift, into a qualitatively different operating regime, but decision makers cannot tell which parts of the broader system are directly affected, which are indirectly exposed, which will experience cascading consequences, and which remain outside the material impact boundary. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The consequences of the shift depend on coupling pathways, thresholds, buffers, dependency chains, or shared exposure across multiple subsystems.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The consequences of the shift depend on coupling pathways, thresholds, buffers, dependency chains, or shared exposure across multiple subsystems.", "A system has shifted, or may soon shift, into a qualitatively different operating regime, but decision makers cannot tell which parts of the broader system are directly affected, which are indirectly exposed, which will experience cascading consequences, and which remain outside the material impact boundary."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Regime change requires feedback-driven thresholds but not propagation through multiple subsystems or shared exposure.", "slug": "regime_change"}], "normalized_requirement": "The consequences of the shift depend on coupling pathways, thresholds, buffers, dependency chains, or shared exposure across multiple subsystems.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The consequences of the shift depend on coupling pathways, thresholds, buffers, dependency chains, or shared exposure across multiple subsystems.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Stakeholders disagree about whether consequences are contained, regional, systemic, temporary, persistent, reversible, or irreversible.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Stakeholders disagree about whether consequences are contained, regional, systemic, temporary, persistent, reversible, or irreversible. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders disagree about whether consequences are contained, regional, systemic, temporary, persistent, reversible, or irreversible."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Stakeholders disagree about whether consequences are contained, regional, systemic, temporary, persistent, reversible, or irreversible."}, {"display_text": "Resource allocation requires knowing which zones, actors, assets, populations, or processes fall inside the impact boundary.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system has shifted, or may soon shift, into a qualitatively different operating regime, but decision makers cannot tell which parts of the broader system are directly affected, which are indirectly exposed, which will experience cascading consequences, and which remain outside the material impact boundary. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: Resource allocation requires knowing which zones, actors, assets, populations, or processes fall inside the impact boundary. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Resource allocation requires knowing which zones, actors, assets, populations, or processes fall inside the impact boundary.", "A system has shifted, or may soon shift, into a qualitatively different operating regime, but decision makers cannot tell which parts of the broader system are directly affected, which are indirectly exposed, which will experience cascading consequences, and which remain outside the material impact boundary."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Resource allocation requires knowing which zones, actors, assets, populations, or processes fall inside the impact boundary."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 54, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-054", "ledger_sha256": "3b6633a4865c2bec7938a9f9d8d04f746006beebada612a5d2715e4332a2396c"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Registry-Mediated Discovery", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:registry_mediated_discovery", "slug": "registry_mediated_discovery"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 5, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Agents or systems need to find one another repeatedly, but direct references encode current locations, endpoint details, personal contacts, ownership, or local paths that change. Without a shared discovery layer, references break, stale endpoints persist, duplicate directories diverge, and coupling shifts from stable identity to unstable topology.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Agents or systems need to find one another repeatedly, but direct references encode current locations, endpoint details, personal contacts, ownership, or local paths that change. Without a shared discovery layer, references break, stale endpoints persist, duplicate directories diverge, and coupling shifts from stable identity to unstable topology."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime requires providers to join, leave, or relocate while consumers still need current resolution.", "role_mapping": "Moving participants -> provider turnover; findability -> resolution.", "slug": "registry_mediated_discovery", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b054_a08_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Participants, services, records, assets, or responsibilities move while other actors still need to find them. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Participants, services, records, assets, or responsibilities move while other actors still need to find them."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Registry-Mediated Discovery", "one_liner": "Agents find each other through a shared registry rather than by direct reference: a named indirection mapping stable identifiers to current locations, so coupling survives turnover.", "page_ref": "prime:registry_mediated_discovery", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Moving participants -> provider turnover; findability -> resolution.", "slug": "registry_mediated_discovery", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime requires providers to join, leave, or relocate while consumers still need current resolution."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Participants, services, records, assets, or responsibilities move while other actors still need to find them.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Consumers know a stable logical name and resolve it to a mutable current location through the registry.", "role_mapping": "Stable identifier -> logical name; endpoint -> mutable location.", "slug": "registry_mediated_discovery", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b054_a08_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Agents or systems need to find one another repeatedly, but direct references encode current locations, endpoint details, personal contacts, ownership, or local paths that change. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Callers know a stable name, role, identifier, or category but not the current location, endpoint, custodian, channel, or interface.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Callers know a stable name, role, identifier, or category but not the current location, endpoint, custodian, channel, or interface.", "Agents or systems need to find one another repeatedly, but direct references encode current locations, endpoint details, personal contacts, ownership, or local paths that change."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Registry-Mediated Discovery", "one_liner": "Agents find each other through a shared registry rather than by direct reference: a named indirection mapping stable identifiers to current locations, so coupling survives turnover.", "page_ref": "prime:registry_mediated_discovery", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Stable identifier -> logical name; endpoint -> mutable location.", "slug": "registry_mediated_discovery", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Consumers know a stable logical name and resolve it to a mutable current location through the registry."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Callers know a stable name, role, identifier, or category but not the current location, endpoint, custodian, channel, or interface.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime replaces N×M hard-coded pairwise references with a separately addressable registry.", "role_mapping": "Separate contact maps -> pairwise coupling; shared map -> registry.", "slug": "registry_mediated_discovery", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b054_a08_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Agents or systems need to find one another repeatedly, but direct references encode current locations, endpoint details, personal contacts, ownership, or local paths that change. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Many parties would otherwise maintain separate hard-coded contact lists or endpoint maps.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Many parties would otherwise maintain separate hard-coded contact lists or endpoint maps.", "Agents or systems need to find one another repeatedly, but direct references encode current locations, endpoint details, personal contacts, ownership, or local paths that change."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Registry-Mediated Discovery", "one_liner": "Agents find each other through a shared registry rather than by direct reference: a named indirection mapping stable identifiers to current locations, so coupling survives turnover.", "page_ref": "prime:registry_mediated_discovery", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Separate contact maps -> pairwise coupling; shared map -> registry.", "slug": "registry_mediated_discovery", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime replaces N×M hard-coded pairwise references with a separately addressable registry."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Many parties would otherwise maintain separate hard-coded contact lists or endpoint maps.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Turnover survival means a provider can join or move without changing every consumer.", "role_mapping": "New provider -> turnover; no caller reconfiguration -> survival invariant.", "slug": "registry_mediated_discovery", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b054_a08_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: New participants should become reachable without every existing actor being reconfigured. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["New participants should become reachable without every existing actor being reconfigured."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Registry-Mediated Discovery", "one_liner": "Agents find each other through a shared registry rather than by direct reference: a named indirection mapping stable identifiers to current locations, so coupling survives turnover.", "page_ref": "prime:registry_mediated_discovery", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "New provider -> turnover; no caller reconfiguration -> survival invariant.", "slug": "registry_mediated_discovery", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Turnover survival means a provider can join or move without changing every consumer."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "New participants should become reachable without every existing actor being reconfigured.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The mutable-location role and lookup-at-use-time support moved, retired, or unavailable states without stale direct references.", "role_mapping": "Successor state -> current registry resolution.", "slug": "registry_mediated_discovery", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b054_a08_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Retired, moved, replaced, or temporarily unavailable entities need discoverable successor, forwarding, or unavailable states. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Retired, moved, replaced, or temporarily unavailable entities need discoverable successor, forwarding, or unavailable states."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Registry-Mediated Discovery", "one_liner": "Agents find each other through a shared registry rather than by direct reference: a named indirection mapping stable identifiers to current locations, so coupling survives turnover.", "page_ref": "prime:registry_mediated_discovery", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Successor state -> current registry resolution.", "slug": "registry_mediated_discovery", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The mutable-location role and lookup-at-use-time support moved, retired, or unavailable states without stale direct references."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Retired, moved, replaced, or temporarily unavailable entities need discoverable successor, forwarding, or unavailable states.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Access to discovery metadata must be governed because not every actor should see every locator or contact path.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Direct references optimize immediate contact while making future turnover expensive; registry-mediated discovery adds an indirection layer so identity can remain stable while locators change. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: Access to discovery metadata must be governed because not every actor should see every locator or contact path. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Access to discovery metadata must be governed because not every actor should see every locator or contact path.", "Direct references optimize immediate contact while making future turnover expensive; registry-mediated discovery adds an indirection layer so identity can remain stable while locators change."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Access to discovery metadata must be governed because not every actor should see every locator or contact path."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 54, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-054", "ledger_sha256": "3b6633a4865c2bec7938a9f9d8d04f746006beebada612a5d2715e4332a2396c"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Regress Termination Rule", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:regress_termination_rule", "slug": "regress_termination_rule"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is an unbounded support chain. A claim depends on a reason; the reason depends on a prior premise; the premise depends on a further source; the source depends on a deeper authority, cause, definition, or value. The chain can continue indefinitely.\n\nWithout a termination rule, two bad outcomes become likely. The first is paralysis: no decision is ever justified enough to act. The second is hidden closure: action proceeds anyway, but the actual stopping point is power, fatigue, urgency, or an unstated assumption. In both cases, accountability suffers. Either no one can act, or no one can inspect why action was allowed.\n\nThe underlying tension is that responsible reasoning requires support, while practical action requires closure. Regress Termination Rule resolves this tension by making the stopping point explicit, scoped, and reopenable.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A decision, explanation, proof, policy, design, or action is blocked because each supporting reason calls for another prior reason, each authority requires a higher authority, each cause points to an earlier cause, or each value judgment demands a deeper justification. Without a termination rule, inquiry either never closes or closes invisibly by exhaustion, power, habit, or arbitrary deadline."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime requires each answer to regenerate the same-kind demand and form a non-terminating sequence.", "role_mapping": "Repeated why or proof -> iterating relation and each-step demand.", "slug": "infinite_regress", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b054_a09_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "If it never closes, the decision becomes impossible and practical authority shifts to delay, fatigue, or whoever can keep demanding more proof. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Each answer generates another why, proof, or authority demand.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Each answer generates another why, proof, or authority demand.", "If it never closes, the decision becomes impossible and practical authority shifts to delay, fatigue, or whoever can keep demanding more proof."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Infinite Regress", "one_liner": "Endless chain of explanation.", "page_ref": "prime:infinite_regress", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Repeated why or proof -> iterating relation and each-step demand.", "slug": "infinite_regress", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime requires each answer to regenerate the same-kind demand and form a non-terminating sequence."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Each answer generates another why, proof, or authority demand.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An unproved premise may be accepted as an axiom without generating any iterated same-kind demand.", "slug": "infinite_regress"}], "residual_id": "r:regress_termination_rule:b054_a09_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b054_a09_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It fits governance decisions, policy rationales, research thresholds, incident analysis, strategy assumptions, formal modeling, and ethical or legal reasoning where complete justification is impossible inside the current frame. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A decision depends on a premise that cannot be fully proven inside the current frame.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A decision depends on a premise that cannot be fully proven inside the current frame.", "It fits governance decisions, policy rationales, research thresholds, incident analysis, strategy assumptions, formal modeling, and ethical or legal reasoning where complete justification is impossible inside the current frame."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An unproved premise may be accepted as an axiom without generating any iterated same-kind demand.", "slug": "infinite_regress"}], "normalized_requirement": "A decision depends on a premise that cannot be fully proven inside the current frame.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A decision depends on a premise that cannot be fully proven inside the current frame.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Root-cause inquiry that repeatedly moves to a broader cause instantiates a uniform explanatory relation without an actionable terminus.", "role_mapping": "Broader cause -> successor explanation; no actionable level -> missing terminator.", "slug": "infinite_regress", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b054_a09_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Root-cause analysis keeps moving to broader causes without an actionable level. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Root-cause analysis keeps moving to broader causes without an actionable level."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Infinite Regress", "one_liner": "Endless chain of explanation.", "page_ref": "prime:infinite_regress", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Broader cause -> successor explanation; no actionable level -> missing terminator.", "slug": "infinite_regress", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Root-cause inquiry that repeatedly moves to a broader cause instantiates a uniform explanatory relation without an actionable terminus."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Root-cause analysis keeps moving to broader causes without an actionable level.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Recursive escalation of authority reproduces the same approval demand at each level.", "role_mapping": "Approval demand -> iterating relation; higher authority -> successor.", "slug": "infinite_regress", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b054_a09_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Authority or approval keeps escalating recursively. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Authority or approval keeps escalating recursively."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Infinite Regress", "one_liner": "Endless chain of explanation.", "page_ref": "prime:infinite_regress", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Approval demand -> iterating relation; higher authority -> successor.", "slug": "infinite_regress", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Recursive escalation of authority reproduces the same approval demand at each level."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Authority or approval keeps escalating recursively.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A termination condition can be explicit, well-founded, and correctly timed, with no oscillation.", "slug": "termination_condition"}], "residual_id": "r:regress_termination_rule:b054_a09_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b054_a09_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The group alternates between premature closure and endless inquiry. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The group alternates between premature closure and endless inquiry."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A termination condition can be explicit, well-founded, and correctly timed, with no oscillation.", "slug": "termination_condition"}], "normalized_requirement": "The group alternates between premature closure and endless inquiry.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The group alternates between premature closure and endless inquiry.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The stakes require transparent assumptions rather than tacit defaults.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The stakes require transparent assumptions rather than tacit defaults. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The stakes require transparent assumptions rather than tacit defaults."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The stakes require transparent assumptions rather than tacit defaults."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 54, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-054", "ledger_sha256": "3b6633a4865c2bec7938a9f9d8d04f746006beebada612a5d2715e4332a2396c"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Regression-to-the-Mean Guardrail", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:regression_to_mean_guardrail", "slug": "regression_to_mean_guardrail"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 7, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 3, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 7 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 3 of 7 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 7}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Human attention and institutional action are triggered by extremes. A patient seeks care when symptoms peak; a school is targeted after a bad year; a manager praises a record month or sanctions a disastrous one; an inspector intervenes after a defect spike. The timing creates a compelling before-intervention/after-intervention story.\n\nThat story is structurally biased because the selection observation is not an ordinary baseline. Without repeated baseline data, reliability evidence, a similarly selected comparison, and temporal context, the expected no-effect path is already toward a less extreme observation. Raw change therefore combines reversion with any genuine effect.\n\nThe central tension is urgent response versus credible learning. Extreme cases often need action precisely when clean experimentation is hardest. The archetype supports action while separating service or safety decisions from overconfident attribution and preserving evidence for later learning.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Interventions, rewards, punishments, inspections, and stories often begin immediately after an extreme outcome. When the next observation is closer to the relevant average, the sequence feels causal even if part or all of the movement was predictable from selection and imperfect reliability."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Regression to the mean applies without any eligibility rule; extreme selection can occur analytically after measurement.", "slug": "regression_to_the_mean"}], "residual_id": "r:regression_to_mean_guardrail:b054_a10_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b054_a10_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use it whenever treatment, inspection, coaching, reward, sanction, funding, investigation, or follow-up begins because an outcome crossed a threshold, entered the top or bottom of a ranking, reached crisis severity, or otherwise looked exceptional. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: eligibility follows a high or low threshold.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["eligibility follows a high or low threshold", "Use it whenever treatment, inspection, coaching, reward, sanction, funding, investigation, or follow-up begins because an outcome crossed a threshold, entered the top or bottom of a ranking, reached crisis severity, or otherwise looked exceptional."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Regression to the mean applies without any eligibility rule; extreme selection can occur analytically after measurement.", "slug": "regression_to_the_mean"}], "normalized_requirement": "eligibility follows a high or low threshold", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "eligibility follows a high or low threshold", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's effect becomes visible when subjects are selected for extreme baseline values.", "role_mapping": "Worst or best performers -> extreme-selected subset.", "slug": "regression_to_the_mean", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b054_a10_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: worst or best performers are singled out. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["worst or best performers are singled out"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Regression to the Mean", "one_liner": "Extremes return toward average.", "page_ref": "prime:regression_to_the_mean", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Worst or best performers -> extreme-selected subset.", "slug": "regression_to_the_mean", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's effect becomes visible when subjects are selected for extreme baseline values."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "worst or best performers are singled out", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P092-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve symptom-state and care-intervention roles.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A person has a symptom trajectory and receives a care intervention.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail care onset at the crisis or extreme symptom state, not care already underway beforehand.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The care intervention begins at the symptom crisis point.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "Care begins when symptoms reach a crisis.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "care onset occurs at symptom crisis", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P092-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The statistical pattern is substrate-neutral and need not involve symptoms, care, or crisis.", "slug": "regression_to_the_mean"}], "residual_id": "r:regression_to_mean_guardrail:b054_a10_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b054_a10_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A patient seeks care when symptoms peak; a school is targeted after a bad year; a manager praises a record month or sanctions a disastrous one; an inspector intervenes after a defect spike. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: care begins at a symptom crisis.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["care begins at a symptom crisis", "A patient seeks care when symptoms peak; a school is targeted after a bad year; a manager praises a record month or sanctions a disastrous one; an inspector intervenes after a defect spike."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The statistical pattern is substrate-neutral and need not involve symptoms, care, or crisis.", "slug": "regression_to_the_mean"}], "normalized_requirement": "care begins at a symptom crisis", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "care begins at a symptom crisis", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P092-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve incident-spike and inspection roles.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An incident process exhibits a spike and an inspection is initiated or conducted.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail the stated temporal order rather than an inspection that precedes or is unrelated to the spike.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The inspection occurs after the incident spike.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "An inspection occurs after an incident spike.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "inspection follows an incident spike", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P092-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Regression can arise without incidents or inspection.", "slug": "regression_to_the_mean"}], "residual_id": "r:regression_to_mean_guardrail:b054_a10_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b054_a10_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use it whenever treatment, inspection, coaching, reward, sanction, funding, investigation, or follow-up begins because an outcome crossed a threshold, entered the top or bottom of a ranking, reached crisis severity, or otherwise looked exceptional. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: inspection follows an incident spike.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["inspection follows an incident spike", "Use it whenever treatment, inspection, coaching, reward, sanction, funding, investigation, or follow-up begins because an outcome crossed a threshold, entered the top or bottom of a ranking, reached crisis severity, or otherwise looked exceptional."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Regression can arise without incidents or inspection.", "slug": "regression_to_the_mean"}], "normalized_requirement": "inspection follows an incident spike", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "inspection follows an incident spike", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B5", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Retesting an extreme screen is the canonical extreme-selection plus repeated-measurement configuration.", "role_mapping": "Extreme screen -> selected baseline; retest -> second measurement.", "slug": "regression_to_the_mean", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b054_a10_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: retesting follows an extreme screen. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["retesting follows an extreme screen"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Regression to the Mean", "one_liner": "Extremes return toward average.", "page_ref": "prime:regression_to_the_mean", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Extreme screen -> selected baseline; retest -> second measurement.", "slug": "regression_to_the_mean", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Retesting an extreme screen is the canonical extreme-selection plus repeated-measurement configuration."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "retesting follows an extreme screen", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 5", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B6", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Regression exists without intervention or causal attribution and may be modeled with controls.", "slug": "regression_to_the_mean"}], "residual_id": "r:regression_to_mean_guardrail:b054_a10_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b054_a10_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: before-after change is the primary evidence. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["before-after change is the primary evidence"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Regression exists without intervention or causal attribution and may be modeled with controls.", "slug": "regression_to_the_mean"}], "normalized_requirement": "before-after change is the primary evidence", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "before-after change is the primary evidence", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 6", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B7", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires imperfect correlation across repeated measurements, commonly supplied by transient variation.", "role_mapping": "Transient variation -> measurement noise and imperfect correlation.", "slug": "regression_to_the_mean", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b054_a10_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: the measure has substantial transient variation. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["the measure has substantial transient variation"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Regression to the Mean", "one_liner": "Extremes return toward average.", "page_ref": "prime:regression_to_the_mean", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Transient variation -> measurement noise and imperfect correlation.", "slug": "regression_to_the_mean", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires imperfect correlation across repeated measurements, commonly supplied by transient variation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "the measure has substantial transient variation", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 7", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "DISJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 54, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-054", "ledger_sha256": "3b6633a4865c2bec7938a9f9d8d04f746006beebada612a5d2715e4332a2396c"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Regret-Signal Calibration", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:regret_signal_calibration", "slug": "regret_signal_calibration"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 6, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 4, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 4 of 6 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A person, team, model, or institution experiences or anticipates disvalue from a comparison with a better forgone alternative, but lacks a disciplined way to test the alternative, size the gap, assign controllability, and decide whether the signal should lead to learning, reversal, repair, or closure.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A person, team, model, or institution experiences or anticipates disvalue from a comparison with a better forgone alternative, but lacks a disciplined way to test the alternative, size the gap, assign controllability, and decide whether the signal should lead to learning, reversal, repair, or closure."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime is the scalar shortfall between a realized outcome and a better forgone alternative.", "role_mapping": "Worse outcome -> realized branch; rejected alternative -> counterfactual benchmark.", "slug": "regret", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b054_a11_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: An outcome is worse than a rejected, missed, delayed, or unchosen alternative appears to have been. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["An outcome is worse than a rejected, missed, delayed, or unchosen alternative appears to have been."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Regret", "one_liner": "Disvalue from comparing an outcome against a better forgone alternative.", "page_ref": "prime:regret", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Worse outcome -> realized branch; rejected alternative -> counterfactual benchmark.", "slug": "regret", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime is the scalar shortfall between a realized outcome and a better forgone alternative."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "An outcome is worse than a rejected, missed, delayed, or unchosen alternative appears to have been.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact structure compares with the best forgone branch but does not entail repetitive rumination or failure to test feasibility.", "slug": "regret"}], "residual_id": "r:regret_signal_calibration:b054_a11_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b054_a11_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Regret is valuable because it can reveal a better possible path, yet dangerous because counterfactual imagination is unconstrained unless availability, knowability, controllability, and actionability are made explicit. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Decision-makers are stuck replaying what they should have done, but the alternative has not been tested for availability, feasibility, or knowability at the time.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Decision-makers are stuck replaying what they should have done, but the alternative has not been tested for availability, feasibility, or knowability at the time.", "Regret is valuable because it can reveal a better possible path, yet dangerous because counterfactual imagination is unconstrained unless availability, knowability, controllability, and actionability are made explicit."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact structure compares with the best forgone branch but does not entail repetitive rumination or failure to test feasibility.", "slug": "regret"}], "normalized_requirement": "Decision-makers are stuck replaying what they should have done, but the alternative has not been tested for availability, feasibility, or knowability at the time.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Decision-makers are stuck replaying what they should have done, but the alternative has not been tested for availability, feasibility, or knowability at the time.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime explicitly includes anticipated regret fed backward into present choice.", "role_mapping": "Hard-to-reverse choice -> present commitment; anticipated regret -> backward feedback.", "slug": "regret", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b054_a11_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A future choice is costly or hard to reverse, so anticipated regret should inform option design before commitment. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A future choice is costly or hard to reverse, so anticipated regret should inform option design before commitment."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Regret", "one_liner": "Disvalue from comparing an outcome against a better forgone alternative.", "page_ref": "prime:regret", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Hard-to-reverse choice -> present commitment; anticipated regret -> backward feedback.", "slug": "regret", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime explicitly includes anticipated regret fed backward into present choice."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A future choice is costly or hard to reverse, so anticipated regret should inform option design before commitment.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Formal regret matrices and minimax-regret comparisons are explicit instances of the prime's counterfactual shortfall measure.", "role_mapping": "Decision matrix -> alternative branches; regret score -> scalar shortfall.", "slug": "regret", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b054_a11_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A formal decision under uncertainty needs a regret measure, regret matrix, or minimax-regret comparison. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A formal decision under uncertainty needs a regret measure, regret matrix, or minimax-regret comparison."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Regret", "one_liner": "Disvalue from comparing an outcome against a better forgone alternative.", "page_ref": "prime:regret", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Decision matrix -> alternative branches; regret score -> scalar shortfall.", "slug": "regret", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Formal regret matrices and minimax-regret comparisons are explicit instances of the prime's counterfactual shortfall measure."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A formal decision under uncertainty needs a regret measure, regret matrix, or minimax-regret comparison.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B5", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A disappointing outcome can fall short of expectation without a better forgone branch, and regret need not involve a team or blame.", "slug": "regret"}], "residual_id": "r:regret_signal_calibration:b054_a11_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b054_a11_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A person, team, model, or institution experiences or anticipates disvalue from a comparison with a better forgone alternative, but lacks a disciplined way to test the alternative, size the gap, assign controllability, and decide whether the signal should lead to learning, reversal, repair, or closure. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A team wants to learn from a disappointing outcome without hindsight bias, scapegoating, or defensive rationalization.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A team wants to learn from a disappointing outcome without hindsight bias, scapegoating, or defensive rationalization.", "A person, team, model, or institution experiences or anticipates disvalue from a comparison with a better forgone alternative, but lacks a disciplined way to test the alternative, size the gap, assign controllability, and decide whether the signal should lead to learning, reversal, repair, or closure."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A disappointing outcome can fall short of expectation without a better forgone branch, and regret need not involve a team or blame.", "slug": "regret"}], "normalized_requirement": "A team wants to learn from a disappointing outcome without hindsight bias, scapegoating, or defensive rationalization.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A team wants to learn from a disappointing outcome without hindsight bias, scapegoating, or defensive rationalization.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 5", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B6", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The condition explicitly states that regret's forgone-branch comparison is feeding maladaptive future choice.", "role_mapping": "Regret signal -> counterfactual shortfall; escalation or reversal -> feedback into choice.", "slug": "regret", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b054_a11_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Regret is driving sunk-cost escalation, impulsive reversal, paralysis, or blame rather than a clear update. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Regret is driving sunk-cost escalation, impulsive reversal, paralysis, or blame rather than a clear update."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Regret", "one_liner": "Disvalue from comparing an outcome against a better forgone alternative.", "page_ref": "prime:regret", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Regret signal -> counterfactual shortfall; escalation or reversal -> feedback into choice.", "slug": "regret", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The condition explicitly states that regret's forgone-branch comparison is feeding maladaptive future choice."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Regret is driving sunk-cost escalation, impulsive reversal, paralysis, or blame rather than a clear update.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 6", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "DISJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 54, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-054", "ledger_sha256": "3b6633a4865c2bec7938a9f9d8d04f746006beebada612a5d2715e4332a2396c"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Regroupable Aggregation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:regroupable_aggregation", "slug": "regroupable_aggregation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 5 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a mismatch between decomposition freedom and semantic stability. Inputs naturally arrive or are managed in partitions—files, shards, windows, clinics, teams, accounts, regions, simulation blocks—but the final result was defined as though there were one indivisible accumulator. Intermediate results lose information or encode local assumptions, so the hierarchy becomes part of the answer.\n\nSeveral recurring defects create this mismatch. A lossy scalar replaces sufficient state. An operation that is mathematically associative is implemented with floating-point behavior whose rounding depends on tree shape. Empty partitions receive an invented identity. A combine function mixes units or schema versions. Group boundaries overlap. Side effects occur during combination. Or an algorithm preserves grouping but the runtime also reorders partitions, silently requiring commutativity.\n\nThese defects are hard to see in ordinary examples. Equal group sizes make an average-of-averages look correct. Small positive numbers hide cancellation. Symmetric test data hides operand order. A single software version hides compatibility failures. A fixed worker count hides topology coupling. The defect often appears only after scale, reorganization, failover, or optimization changes the grouping.\n\nRegroupable Aggregation treats the reduction tree as an adversarial variable. If changing the tree changes the meaning, the summary contract is incomplete or the operation is not eligible for this archetype.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A result is computed by aggregating many contributions, but current partial results are not safely composable. Changing batch size, hierarchy, worker count, shard boundary, subtotal layout, or reduction-tree shape changes the result; alternatively the system must serialize all work through one accumulator. The cause may be a genuinely non-associative operation, a lossy partial summary such as averaging averages without counts, hidden ordering effects, incompatible summary versions, rounding drift, side effects, or an untested assumption that mathematical associativity survives the implementation's finite precision and business semantics."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Aggregation is many-to-one reduction but need not be chunked or recursively regrouped.", "slug": "aggregation"}], "residual_id": "r:regroupable_aggregation:b054_a12_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b054_a12_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Inputs naturally arrive or are managed in partitions—files, shards, windows, clinics, teams, accounts, regions, simulation blocks—but the final result was defined as though there were one indivisible accumulator. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Large input sets must be processed in chunks, windows, shards, teams, regions, or hierarchy levels.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Large input sets must be processed in chunks, windows, shards, teams, regions, or hierarchy levels.", "Inputs naturally arrive or are managed in partitions—files, shards, windows, clinics, teams, accounts, regions, simulation blocks—but the final result was defined as though there were one indivisible accumulator."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Aggregation is many-to-one reduction but need not be chunked or recursively regrouped.", "slug": "aggregation"}], "normalized_requirement": "Large input sets must be processed in chunks, windows, shards, teams, regions, or hierarchy levels.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Large input sets must be processed in chunks, windows, shards, teams, regions, or hierarchy levels.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Local-to-global aggregation combines compatible local witnesses into a global verdict, not arbitrary numerical partial summaries.", "slug": "local_to_global_aggregation"}], "residual_id": "r:regroupable_aggregation:b054_a12_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b054_a12_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A result is computed by aggregating many contributions, but current partial results are not safely composable. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Partial results need to be merged incrementally, recursively, in parallel, or after delayed arrival.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Partial results need to be merged incrementally, recursively, in parallel, or after delayed arrival.", "A result is computed by aggregating many contributions, but current partial results are not safely composable."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Local-to-global aggregation combines compatible local witnesses into a global verdict, not arbitrary numerical partial summaries.", "slug": "local_to_global_aggregation"}], "normalized_requirement": "Partial results need to be merged incrementally, recursively, in parallel, or after delayed arrival.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Partial results need to be merged incrementally, recursively, in parallel, or after delayed arrival.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Aggregation may be intentionally grouping-sensitive; topology invariance is not mandatory.", "slug": "aggregation"}], "residual_id": "r:regroupable_aggregation:b054_a12_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b054_a12_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A fixed worker count hides topology coupling. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Different deployment topologies or worker counts currently produce different answers.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Different deployment topologies or worker counts currently produce different answers.", "A fixed worker count hides topology coupling."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Aggregation may be intentionally grouping-sensitive; topology invariance is not mandatory.", "slug": "aggregation"}], "normalized_requirement": "Different deployment topologies or worker counts currently produce different answers.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Different deployment topologies or worker counts currently produce different answers.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime deliberately discards granular information to produce a lower-dimensional summary.", "role_mapping": "Scalar summary -> many-to-one map; lost weights and provenance -> selected information loss.", "slug": "aggregation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b054_a12_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Carrying sum and count repairs the partial state. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A scalar summary discards weights, counts, provenance, uncertainty, or other state needed for correct recombination.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A scalar summary discards weights, counts, provenance, uncertainty, or other state needed for correct recombination.", "Carrying sum and count repairs the partial state."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Aggregation", "one_liner": "Deliberately collapsing many items into a single summary, choosing which information to discard to gain tractability.", "page_ref": "prime:aggregation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Scalar summary -> many-to-one map; lost weights and provenance -> selected information loss.", "slug": "aggregation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime deliberately discards granular information to produce a lower-dimensional summary."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A scalar summary discards weights, counts, provenance, uncertainty, or other state needed for correct recombination.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P092-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the raw, local-summary, and higher-summary levels of a reporting hierarchy.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A reporting hierarchy contains raw records, local totals, and one or more higher-level totals.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a roll-up requirement rather than an optional reporting convenience.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The hierarchy is required to roll local totals into higher-level totals.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail composition of partial totals rather than direct recomputation from raw records.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Higher-level totals are computed by combining local totals.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve stable totals rather than results that change with grouping or subtotal layout.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The higher-level totals remain stable under the hierarchy's roll-up structure.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail summary composition without raw-record replay.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The roll-up does not recompute the underlying raw records.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "A reporting hierarchy must combine local totals into stable higher-level totals without recomputing the raw records.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "hierarchical local-total rollup yields stable totals without raw-record replay", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P092-C13-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Aggregation does not guarantee associative regrouping or stable hierarchical totals.", "slug": "aggregation"}], "residual_id": "r:regroupable_aggregation:b054_a12_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b054_a12_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Intermediate results lose information or encode local assumptions, so the hierarchy becomes part of the answer. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A reporting hierarchy must roll local totals into stable higher-level totals without recomputing raw records.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A reporting hierarchy must roll local totals into stable higher-level totals without recomputing raw records.", "Intermediate results lose information or encode local assumptions, so the hierarchy becomes part of the answer."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Aggregation does not guarantee associative regrouping or stable hierarchical totals.", "slug": "aggregation"}], "normalized_requirement": "A reporting hierarchy must roll local totals into stable higher-level totals without recomputing raw records.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A reporting hierarchy must roll local totals into stable higher-level totals without recomputing raw records.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Tests need to distinguish grouping sensitivity from order sensitivity and duplicate sensitivity.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: Tests need to distinguish grouping sensitivity from order sensitivity and duplicate sensitivity. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Tests need to distinguish grouping sensitivity from order sensitivity and duplicate sensitivity."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Tests need to distinguish grouping sensitivity from order sensitivity and duplicate sensitivity."}, {"display_text": "Exact equality is impossible under finite precision, but a justified error envelope can be governed.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The cause may be a genuinely non-associative operation, a lossy partial summary such as averaging averages without counts, hidden ordering effects, incompatible summary versions, rounding drift, side effects, or an untested assumption that mathematical associativity survives the implementation's finite precision and business semantics. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: Exact equality is impossible under finite precision, but a justified error envelope can be governed. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Exact equality is impossible under finite precision, but a justified error envelope can be governed.", "The cause may be a genuinely non-associative operation, a lossy partial summary such as averaging averages without counts, hidden ordering effects, incompatible summary versions, rounding drift, side effects, or an untested assumption that mathematical associativity survives the implementation's finite precision and business semantics."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "Exact equality is impossible under finite precision, but a justified error envelope can be governed."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 54, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-054", "ledger_sha256": "3b6633a4865c2bec7938a9f9d8d04f746006beebada612a5d2715e4332a2396c"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Reinforcement Loop Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:reinforcement_loop_design", "slug": "reinforcement_loop_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 3 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is misaligned behavioral learning. The environment teaches one lesson while the organization, product, trainer, or system says it wants another. A worker may be told to report near misses, but reporting takes time and creates blame. A learner may be told to practice, but feedback arrives too late to help. A team may be told to prioritize quality, but recognition goes to speed. A user may be prompted repeatedly, but the prompt is not tied to a meaningful response or feedback path.\n\nThe problem is not simply that people lack motivation. Often they are responding rationally to the reinforcement structure around them. Reinforcement Loop Design makes that structure visible and redesigns it.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Desired behavior is not learned, repeated, or maintained because the surrounding cues, feedback, rewards, costs, social signals, or natural consequences reinforce something else, arrive too late to teach, or reward only a proxy for the intended behavior."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime entails contingent probability update, but the strengthened action need not be an undesirable shortcut or vanity metric.", "slug": "reinforcement"}], "residual_id": "r:reinforcement_loop_design:b054_a13_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b054_a13_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Desired behavior is not learned, repeated, or maintained because the surrounding cues, feedback, rewards, costs, social signals, or natural consequences reinforce something else, arrive too late to teach, or reward only a proxy for the intended behavior. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Current conditions reward speed, silence, shortcuts, avoidance, or vanity metrics more reliably than the desired behavior.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Current conditions reward speed, silence, shortcuts, avoidance, or vanity metrics more reliably than the desired behavior.", "Desired behavior is not learned, repeated, or maintained because the surrounding cues, feedback, rewards, costs, social signals, or natural consequences reinforce something else, arrive too late to teach, or reward only a proxy for the intended behavior."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime entails contingent probability update, but the strengthened action need not be an undesirable shortcut or vanity metric.", "slug": "reinforcement"}], "normalized_requirement": "Current conditions reward speed, silence, shortcuts, avoidance, or vanity metrics more reliably than the desired behavior.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Current conditions reward speed, silence, shortcuts, avoidance, or vanity metrics more reliably than the desired behavior.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Reinforcement does not require conscious contrary intent, a busy context, or memory failure.", "slug": "reinforcement"}], "residual_id": "r:reinforcement_loop_design:b054_a13_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b054_a13_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: People intend to act differently but the relevant cue appears in a busy context where memory and willpower are unreliable. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["People intend to act differently but the relevant cue appears in a busy context where memory and willpower are unreliable."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Reinforcement does not require conscious contrary intent, a busy context, or memory failure.", "slug": "reinforcement"}], "normalized_requirement": "People intend to act differently but the relevant cue appears in a busy context where memory and willpower are unreliable.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "People intend to act differently but the relevant cue appears in a busy context where memory and willpower are unreliable.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime requires repeated action-consequence contingencies and differential updating rather than declarative instruction.", "role_mapping": "Practice -> candidate actions; feedback -> contingent value signal and update.", "slug": "reinforcement", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b054_a13_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when a behavior needs to be learned, repeated, stabilized, or transferred into practice. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Learning depends on repeated practice and feedback rather than declarative explanation alone.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Learning depends on repeated practice and feedback rather than declarative explanation alone.", "Use this archetype when a behavior needs to be learned, repeated, stabilized, or transferred into practice."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Reinforcement", "one_liner": "An action's consequence selectively changes the probability of that action recurring under similar conditions.", "page_ref": "prime:reinforcement", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Practice -> candidate actions; feedback -> contingent value signal and update.", "slug": "reinforcement", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime requires repeated action-consequence contingencies and differential updating rather than declarative instruction."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Learning depends on repeated practice and feedback rather than declarative explanation alone.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A desired behavior is clear enough to observe, but adoption is inconsistent after instruction, policy, persuasion, or one-time reminders.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when prior interventions were mostly informational: a memo, training slide, policy reminder, or verbal instruction. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: A desired behavior is clear enough to observe, but adoption is inconsistent after instruction, policy, persuasion, or one-time reminders. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A desired behavior is clear enough to observe, but adoption is inconsistent after instruction, policy, persuasion, or one-time reminders.", "It is especially useful when prior interventions were mostly informational: a memo, training slide, policy reminder, or verbal instruction."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "A desired behavior is clear enough to observe, but adoption is inconsistent after instruction, policy, persuasion, or one-time reminders."}, {"display_text": "Safety, quality, reporting, service, or training behavior decays after supervision, novelty, or campaign attention fades.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The behavior should be concrete enough to observe: reporting a hazard, practicing a skill, completing a quality check, asking for help, logging an issue, following a safety step, or giving a timely handoff. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Safety, quality, reporting, service, or training behavior decays after supervision, novelty, or campaign attention fades. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Safety, quality, reporting, service, or training behavior decays after supervision, novelty, or campaign attention fades.", "The behavior should be concrete enough to observe: reporting a hazard, practicing a skill, completing a quality check, asking for help, logging an issue, following a safety step, or giving a timely handoff."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Safety, quality, reporting, service, or training behavior decays after supervision, novelty, or campaign attention fades."}, {"display_text": "A reward, metric, or penalty exists, but it is suspected of creating gaming, concealment, inequity, dependency, or shallow compliance.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this deployment constraint: A reward, metric, or penalty exists, but it is suspected of creating gaming, concealment, inequity, dependency, or shallow compliance. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A reward, metric, or penalty exists, but it is suspected of creating gaming, concealment, inequity, dependency, or shallow compliance."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "A reward, metric, or penalty exists, but it is suspected of creating gaming, concealment, inequity, dependency, or shallow compliance."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 54, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-054", "ledger_sha256": "3b6633a4865c2bec7938a9f9d8d04f746006beebada612a5d2715e4332a2396c"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Relation Constraint Enforcement", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:relation_constraint_enforcement", "slug": "relation_constraint_enforcement"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 4 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is not merely bad data, bad actors, or bad objects. It is a bad relational state. The system permits links that should not exist, omits links that must exist, reverses directionality, allows too many or too few instances of a relationship, or treats an unsupported pairing as legitimate.\n\nThis creates failures that are easy to miss because every individual entity may look valid. A record exists, but points to the wrong parent. A process step is completed, but by an actor who should not have that relationship to the decision. A dependency exists, but violates trust boundaries. A policy case is filed, but lacks required source, consent, or authority links. The inconsistency lives between entities.\n\nThe recurring tension is flexibility versus relational closure. Real systems need unusual relationships, migrations, exceptions, and emergency handling. But without constraints, the system drifts into states that cannot be trusted. The archetype preserves flexibility by making exceptions explicit rather than allowing invalid relationships to disappear into informal workarounds.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system allows relationships among entities, records, actors, roles, resources, processes, or artifacts that should not coexist, should not point in that direction, should not have that multiplicity, or should not be trusted as valid without additional checks."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Compatibility describes safe composition; it does not entail the pre-intervention existence of an invalid relation.", "slug": "compatibility"}], "residual_id": "r:relation_constraint_enforcement:b054_a14_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b054_a14_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This creates failures that are easy to miss because every individual entity may look valid. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Entities are individually valid but can be connected in invalid or harmful ways.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Entities are individually valid but can be connected in invalid or harmful ways.", "This creates failures that are easy to miss because every individual entity may look valid."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Compatibility describes safe composition; it does not entail the pre-intervention existence of an invalid relation.", "slug": "compatibility"}], "normalized_requirement": "Entities are individually valid but can be connected in invalid or harmful ways.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Entities are individually valid but can be connected in invalid or harmful ways.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A relation can be represented without any downstream decision depending on its validity.", "slug": "relation"}], "residual_id": "r:relation_constraint_enforcement:b054_a14_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b054_a14_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when downstream action depends on relationship validity. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Downstream decisions depend on relationship validity, not just on the properties of individual items.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Downstream decisions depend on relationship validity, not just on the properties of individual items.", "It is especially useful when downstream action depends on relationship validity."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A relation can be represented without any downstream decision depending on its validity.", "slug": "relation"}], "normalized_requirement": "Downstream decisions depend on relationship validity, not just on the properties of individual items.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Downstream decisions depend on relationship validity, not just on the properties of individual items.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P092-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a relational system with referents, assignments, ownership, dependency, or role-combination structure.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A system contains relationships among entities, records, actors, roles, resources, processes, or artifacts.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail an actual integrity defect rather than a merely unusual but permitted relation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "At least one relationship violates the system's integrity constraints.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a relation with a missing required referent.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The system contains an orphaned link whose required endpoint is absent.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires prohibited ownership multiplicity.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The system contains duplicate owners where the ownership constraint does not permit them.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires assignments that cannot simultaneously be valid.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The system contains contradictory assignments.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a reference that violates type, scope, existence, or validity constraints.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The system contains an invalid reference.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a dependency cycle that violates the relation's acyclicity constraint.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The system contains a circular dependency where cycles are prohibited.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires roles assigned together despite an incompatibility constraint.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The system contains a prohibited combination of roles.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A relational system contains an orphaned link, duplicate owner, contradictory assignment, invalid reference, circular dependency, or prohibited role combination.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "relation graph contains a listed integrity defect", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P092-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A relation does not entail any integrity defect, much less the enumerated defect family.", "slug": "relation"}], "residual_id": "r:relation_constraint_enforcement:b054_a14_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b054_a14_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Typical triggers include orphaned records, duplicate owners, invalid dependencies, forbidden role combinations, unsupported approvals, missing required links, and relationships that are accepted before compatibility or authority is checked. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The system contains orphaned links, duplicate owners, contradictory assignments, invalid references, circular dependencies, or prohibited role combinations.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The system contains orphaned links, duplicate owners, contradictory assignments, invalid references, circular dependencies, or prohibited role combinations.", "Typical triggers include orphaned records, duplicate owners, invalid dependencies, forbidden role combinations, unsupported approvals, missing required links, and relationships that are accepted before compatibility or authority is checked."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A merely advisory second edge is a counterexample to the broad topic, but it is outside the candidate because the exact record requires two binding same-task-time authority edges whose directives diverge.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Unity-of-Command Breakdown", "one_liner": "The command-and-control failure in which one subordinate node in the authority graph carries two or more binding in-edges for the same task at the same time, so that when the supervisors' orders diverge the actor cannot comply with both.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:unity_of_command_breakdown", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "unity_of_command_breakdown"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "unity_of_command_breakdown", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P092-C14-U1", "why_it_fits": "The candidate is a strict subtype of the contradictory-assignment DNF branch: its authority graph contains a realized integrity violation when two binding same-task-time supervisors issue incompatible assignments."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The system contains orphaned links, duplicate owners, contradictory assignments, invalid references, circular dependencies, or prohibited role combinations.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A compatibility relation can already have been validated and need not arise from a premature acceptance workflow.", "slug": "compatibility"}], "residual_id": "r:relation_constraint_enforcement:b054_a14_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b054_a14_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Typical triggers include orphaned records, duplicate owners, invalid dependencies, forbidden role combinations, unsupported approvals, missing required links, and relationships that are accepted before compatibility or authority is checked. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Failures arise when relationship changes are accepted before compatibility, cardinality, authority, or directionality has been checked.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Failures arise when relationship changes are accepted before compatibility, cardinality, authority, or directionality has been checked.", "Typical triggers include orphaned records, duplicate owners, invalid dependencies, forbidden role combinations, unsupported approvals, missing required links, and relationships that are accepted before compatibility or authority is checked."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A compatibility relation can already have been validated and need not arise from a premature acceptance workflow.", "slug": "compatibility"}], "normalized_requirement": "Failures arise when relationship changes are accepted before compatibility, cardinality, authority, or directionality has been checked.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Failures arise when relationship changes are accepted before compatibility, cardinality, authority, or directionality has been checked.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Manual judgment or informal convention is no longer enough to keep relations valid at scale.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "If later processes, audits, safety checks, payments, access permissions, or decisions assume that a relation is valid, then invalid relations need to be stopped before they propagate. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Manual judgment or informal convention is no longer enough to keep relations valid at scale. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Manual judgment or informal convention is no longer enough to keep relations valid at scale.", "If later processes, audits, safety checks, payments, access permissions, or decisions assume that a relation is valid, then invalid relations need to be stopped before they propagate."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Manual judgment or informal convention is no longer enough to keep relations valid at scale."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 54, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-054", "ledger_sha256": "3b6633a4865c2bec7938a9f9d8d04f746006beebada612a5d2715e4332a2396c"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Relation Mapping", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:relation_mapping", "slug": "relation_mapping"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 0, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 0 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 0 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 0}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is hidden relational structure. Entities are known, but the consequential links among them are implicit, scattered, outdated, disputed, or mislabeled. A system can look like a collection of parts while actually behaving like a web of dependencies, obligations, influence paths, constraints, and feedback effects.\n\nThis creates a characteristic failure: people optimize, govern, or change one entity at a time while the relation pattern determines the real outcome. A software team changes a service without knowing which reports depend on it. A policy team changes a rule without seeing the agencies and obligations connected to it. A manager assigns responsibility without seeing informal handoffs. A data team updates a field without seeing downstream models.\n\nThe root tension is that relations need enough explicitness to support action, but not every relation can or should be exposed. Some relations are unstable, uncertain, political, confidential, or ethically sensitive. The map must be useful without becoming falsely authoritative or harmful.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Important associations, dependencies, ownership links, influence paths, obligations, constraints, or data relationships exist but are not explicit enough to guide action."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [], "condition_structure": "DISJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Hidden dependency.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source states: Hidden dependency. The normalized source condition requiring clarification is: Hidden dependency. The wording is retained for source review rather than assigned a stronger semantic role.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["hidden_dependency"]}, "function": "MALFORMED", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because the source wording is not structurally clear enough to support a formal trigger role without clarification.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "hidden_dependency"}, {"display_text": "Unclear association.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source states: Unclear association. The normalized source condition requiring clarification is: Unclear association. The wording is retained for source review rather than assigned a stronger semantic role.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["unclear_association"]}, "function": "MALFORMED", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because the source wording is not structurally clear enough to support a formal trigger role without clarification.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "unclear_association"}, {"display_text": "Coordination failure.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source states: Coordination failure. The normalized source condition requiring clarification is: Coordination failure. The wording is retained for source review rather than assigned a stronger semantic role.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["coordination_failure"]}, "function": "MALFORMED", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because the source wording is not structurally clear enough to support a formal trigger role without clarification.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "coordination_failure"}, {"display_text": "Accountability gap.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source states: Accountability gap. The normalized source condition requiring clarification is: Accountability gap. The wording is retained for source review rather than assigned a stronger semantic role.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["accountability_gap"]}, "function": "MALFORMED", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because the source wording is not structurally clear enough to support a formal trigger role without clarification.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "accountability_gap"}, {"display_text": "Change impact blindness.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It should support a concrete use such as change impact analysis, governance, accountability, repair, redesign, risk review, engagement planning, or coordination. In this archetype, the relevant source condition requiring clarification is: Change impact blindness. The wording is retained for source review rather than assigned a stronger semantic role.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["change_impact_blindness", "It should support a concrete use such as change impact analysis, governance, accountability, repair, redesign, risk review, engagement planning, or coordination."]}, "function": "MALFORMED", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because the source wording is not structurally clear enough to support a formal trigger role without clarification.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "change_impact_blindness"}, {"display_text": "Misleading silo view.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source states: Misleading silo view. The normalized source condition requiring clarification is: Misleading silo view. The wording is retained for source review rather than assigned a stronger semantic role.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["misleading_silo_view"]}, "function": "MALFORMED", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because the source wording is not structurally clear enough to support a formal trigger role without clarification.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "misleading_silo_view"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 54, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-054", "ledger_sha256": "3b6633a4865c2bec7938a9f9d8d04f746006beebada612a5d2715e4332a2396c"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Relation Rewiring", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:relation_rewiring", "slug": "relation_rewiring"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 0, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 0 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 0 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 0}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a misaligned relation topology at the practical level of actors, systems, roles, resources, or decisions. Existing edges may carry the wrong flow, concentrate fragility, route influence through conflicted actors, create unnecessary coupling, or leave crucial actors disconnected.\n\nA recurring sign is that local fixes do not stick. Training, documentation, or role labels improve understanding, but the same handoff fails because the old relation path still routes work through the bottleneck. Risk remains because one supplier, actor, system, or approval path still carries too much critical dependency. Informal bypasses continue because the formal relation pattern does not match operational needs.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Existing relationships among entities create harmful dependency, influence, coordination, incentive, accountability, access, or flow patterns, and those harms persist even when the individual entities are competent or well-defined."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [], "condition_structure": "DISJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Harmful dependency pattern.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Existing relationships among entities create harmful dependency, influence, coordination, incentive, accountability, access, or flow patterns, and those harms persist even when the individual entities are competent or well-defined. In this archetype, the relevant source condition requiring clarification is: Harmful dependency pattern. The wording is retained for source review rather than assigned a stronger semantic role.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["harmful_dependency_pattern", "Existing relationships among entities create harmful dependency, influence, coordination, incentive, accountability, access, or flow patterns, and those harms persist even when the individual entities are competent or well-defined."]}, "function": "MALFORMED", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because the source wording is not structurally clear enough to support a formal trigger role without clarification.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "harmful_dependency_pattern"}, {"display_text": "Misdirected flow.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source states: Misdirected flow. The normalized source condition requiring clarification is: Misdirected flow. The wording is retained for source review rather than assigned a stronger semantic role.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["misdirected_flow"]}, "function": "MALFORMED", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because the source wording is not structurally clear enough to support a formal trigger role without clarification.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "misdirected_flow"}, {"display_text": "Misaligned influence or incentive.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Existing relationships among entities create harmful dependency, influence, coordination, incentive, accountability, access, or flow patterns, and those harms persist even when the individual entities are competent or well-defined. In this archetype, the relevant source condition requiring clarification is: Misaligned influence or incentive. The wording is retained for source review rather than assigned a stronger semantic role.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["misaligned_influence_or_incentive", "Existing relationships among entities create harmful dependency, influence, coordination, incentive, accountability, access, or flow patterns, and those harms persist even when the individual entities are competent or well-defined."]}, "function": "MALFORMED", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because the source wording is not structurally clear enough to support a formal trigger role without clarification.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "misaligned_influence_or_incentive"}, {"display_text": "Accountability path failure.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use Relation Rewiring when the current relation pattern creates or sustains harm: a dependency is too concentrated, a flow path is too slow, an influence channel is misaligned, a coordination relation is missing, or an accountability path routes consequences away from responsible actors. In this archetype, the relevant source condition requiring clarification is: Accountability path failure. The wording is retained for source review rather than assigned a stronger semantic role.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["accountability_path_failure", "Use Relation Rewiring when the current relation pattern creates or sustains harm: a dependency is too concentrated, a flow path is too slow, an influence channel is misaligned, a coordination relation is missing, or an accountability path routes consequences away from responsible actors."]}, "function": "MALFORMED", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because the source wording is not structurally clear enough to support a formal trigger role without clarification.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "accountability_path_failure"}, {"display_text": "Coordination gap or overcoupling.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source states: Coordination gap or overcoupling. The normalized source condition requiring clarification is: Coordination gap or overcoupling. The wording is retained for source review rather than assigned a stronger semantic role.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["coordination_gap_or_overcoupling"]}, "function": "MALFORMED", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because the source wording is not structurally clear enough to support a formal trigger role without clarification.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "coordination_gap_or_overcoupling"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 55, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-055", "ledger_sha256": "d9b9148377269b108a40dc43d18ae544e0d5bdb165aa2c9d8bde8bc3e3b25408"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Relational Grounding Verification", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:relational_grounding_verification", "slug": "relational_grounding_verification"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 4 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system relies on a property, classification, invariant, metric, baseline, identity, or causal claim as if it were absolute, while that claim may actually depend on hidden relations to context, measurement frame, schema, counterparties, scale, or the wider system.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system relies on a property, classification, invariant, metric, baseline, identity, or causal claim as if it were absolute, while that claim may actually depend on hidden relations to context, measurement frame, schema, counterparties, scale, or the wider system."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Common ground is mutually recognized shared information; it does not entail that a local property is treated as absolute or context-underspecified.", "slug": "common_ground"}], "residual_id": "r:relational_grounding_verification:b055_a02_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b055_a02_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Systems need stable properties for action, but many useful properties are stable only relative to a context; the intervention must expose relational dependence without dissolving every claim into unmanageable relativism. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A local property is used as a stable basis for design, governance, measurement, inference, or coordination, but the context that defines it is underspecified.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A local property is used as a stable basis for design, governance, measurement, inference, or coordination, but the context that defines it is underspecified.", "Systems need stable properties for action, but many useful properties are stable only relative to a context; the intervention must expose relational dependence without dissolving every claim into unmanageable relativism."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Common ground is mutually recognized shared information; it does not entail that a local property is treated as absolute or context-underspecified.", "slug": "common_ground"}], "normalized_requirement": "A local property is used as a stable basis for design, governance, measurement, inference, or coordination, but the context that defines it is underspecified.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A local property is used as a stable basis for design, governance, measurement, inference, or coordination, but the context that defines it is underspecified.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Common ground can remain stable across a transfer and need not involve a migrating model or failure.", "slug": "common_ground"}], "residual_id": "r:relational_grounding_verification:b055_a02_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b055_a02_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system relies on a property, classification, invariant, metric, baseline, identity, or causal claim as if it were absolute, while that claim may actually depend on hidden relations to context, measurement frame, schema, counterparties, scale, or the wider system. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A model, schema, metric, rule, or simulation behaves correctly in one context and fails when moved across environments, reference frames, jurisdictions, platforms, or scales.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A model, schema, metric, rule, or simulation behaves correctly in one context and fails when moved across environments, reference frames, jurisdictions, platforms, or scales.", "A system relies on a property, classification, invariant, metric, baseline, identity, or causal claim as if it were absolute, while that claim may actually depend on hidden relations to context, measurement frame, schema, counterparties, scale, or the wider system."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Common ground can remain stable across a transfer and need not involve a migrating model or failure.", "slug": "common_ground"}], "normalized_requirement": "A model, schema, metric, rule, or simulation behaves correctly in one context and fails when moved across environments, reference frames, jurisdictions, platforms, or scales.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A model, schema, metric, rule, or simulation behaves correctly in one context and fails when moved across environments, reference frames, jurisdictions, platforms, or scales.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An equivalence-preserving rewrite explicitly fixes an equivalence relation, so it does not entail an unstated invariance scope.", "slug": "equivalence_preserving_rewriting"}], "residual_id": "r:relational_grounding_verification:b055_a02_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b055_a02_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system relies on a property, classification, invariant, metric, baseline, identity, or causal claim as if it were absolute, while that claim may actually depend on hidden relations to context, measurement frame, schema, counterparties, scale, or the wider system. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: An invariant is asserted without stating the transformations, frames, or relation-preserving conditions under which it remains invariant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["An invariant is asserted without stating the transformations, frames, or relation-preserving conditions under which it remains invariant.", "A system relies on a property, classification, invariant, metric, baseline, identity, or causal claim as if it were absolute, while that claim may actually depend on hidden relations to context, measurement frame, schema, counterparties, scale, or the wider system."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An equivalence-preserving rewrite explicitly fixes an equivalence relation, so it does not entail an unstated invariance scope.", "slug": "equivalence_preserving_rewriting"}], "normalized_requirement": "An invariant is asserted without stating the transformations, frames, or relation-preserving conditions under which it remains invariant.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "An invariant is asserted without stating the transformations, frames, or relation-preserving conditions under which it remains invariant.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P092-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a focal information element and the context in which it initially appears coherent or self-contained.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A data item, label, identity, status, dependency, or equivalent information element is interpreted within an original context.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the initial appearance of local completeness rather than an already explicit contradiction.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The focal element appears self-contained before cross-context integration.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail integration across contexts, not merely comparison without attempted coexistence or use.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The focal element is integrated with another schema, database, legal regime, operating context, or equivalent external frame.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must make integration the condition that exposes the contradiction, rather than an unrelated pre-existing error.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Cross-context integration produces or reveals a contradiction involving the focal element.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "An apparently self-contained information element produces a contradiction when integrated with another representational, institutional, legal, or operating context.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "apparently self-contained information contradicts under cross-context integration", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P092-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A relation does not entail cross-schema integration or contradiction.", "slug": "relation"}], "residual_id": "r:relational_grounding_verification:b055_a02_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b055_a02_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system relies on a property, classification, invariant, metric, baseline, identity, or causal claim as if it were absolute, while that claim may actually depend on hidden relations to context, measurement frame, schema, counterparties, scale, or the wider system. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Data, labels, identities, statuses, or dependencies appear self-contained but produce contradictions when integrated with another schema, database, legal regime, or operating context.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Data, labels, identities, statuses, or dependencies appear self-contained but produce contradictions when integrated with another schema, database, legal regime, or operating context.", "A system relies on a property, classification, invariant, metric, baseline, identity, or causal claim as if it were absolute, while that claim may actually depend on hidden relations to context, measurement frame, schema, counterparties, scale, or the wider system."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A compatible dependency graph is outside the candidate's pathological state; every complete candidate instance contains locally acceptable constraints whose combined closure is mutually infeasible.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Dependency Hell", "one_liner": "The pathological state where a project's transitive dependency closure holds mutually incompatible version constraints, turning installation into an NP-complete constraint-satisfaction problem that no edge-level patch can resolve.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:dependency_hell", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "dependency_hell"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "dependency_hell", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P092-C15-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record directly entails locally coherent dependency constraints becoming mutually contradictory only when their transitive closures must coexist in one runtime namespace."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A label-definition change used only in a disconnected new system would avoid cross-context contradiction, but it is outside this candidate because the monitored model and metrics continue across the hidden definition change.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Ground-Truth Drift", "one_liner": "The model-evaluation failure in which the operational definition of the correct answer drifts on a clock the monitoring apparatus cannot see, so metrics keep scoring against a moved target while the dashboards stay green — invisible because every detector consumes current ground truth as its reference.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:ground_truth_drift", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "ground_truth_drift"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "ground_truth_drift", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P092-C15-U1", "why_it_fits": "The operational label is locally accepted in each time context, while the continuing trained model and evaluation apparatus integrate the old and new meanings; the hidden change makes green current metrics contradict construct validity."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Data, labels, identities, statuses, or dependencies appear self-contained but produce contradictions when integrated with another schema, database, legal regime, or operating context.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Stakeholders disagree about whether a property is intrinsic to an entity or relationally defined by its role, position, counterparties, measurement instrument, or surrounding system.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system relies on a property, classification, invariant, metric, baseline, identity, or causal claim as if it were absolute, while that claim may actually depend on hidden relations to context, measurement frame, schema, counterparties, scale, or the wider system. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Stakeholders disagree about whether a property is intrinsic to an entity or relationally defined by its role, position, counterparties, measurement instrument, or surrounding system. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders disagree about whether a property is intrinsic to an entity or relationally defined by its role, position, counterparties, measurement instrument, or surrounding system.", "A system relies on a property, classification, invariant, metric, baseline, identity, or causal claim as if it were absolute, while that claim may actually depend on hidden relations to context, measurement frame, schema, counterparties, scale, or the wider system."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Stakeholders disagree about whether a property is intrinsic to an entity or relationally defined by its role, position, counterparties, measurement instrument, or surrounding system."}, {"display_text": "A decision depends on whether hidden coupling, contextual grounding, or frame dependence changes the meaning of a property.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system relies on a property, classification, invariant, metric, baseline, identity, or causal claim as if it were absolute, while that claim may actually depend on hidden relations to context, measurement frame, schema, counterparties, scale, or the wider system. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: A decision depends on whether hidden coupling, contextual grounding, or frame dependence changes the meaning of a property. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A decision depends on whether hidden coupling, contextual grounding, or frame dependence changes the meaning of a property.", "A system relies on a property, classification, invariant, metric, baseline, identity, or causal claim as if it were absolute, while that claim may actually depend on hidden relations to context, measurement frame, schema, counterparties, scale, or the wider system."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "A decision depends on whether hidden coupling, contextual grounding, or frame dependence changes the meaning of a property."}, {"display_text": "A system is being migrated, simulated, compared, or generalized and prior assumptions about absolute properties may no longer hold.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system relies on a property, classification, invariant, metric, baseline, identity, or causal claim as if it were absolute, while that claim may actually depend on hidden relations to context, measurement frame, schema, counterparties, scale, or the wider system. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: A system is being migrated, simulated, compared, or generalized and prior assumptions about absolute properties may no longer hold. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A system is being migrated, simulated, compared, or generalized and prior assumptions about absolute properties may no longer hold.", "A system relies on a property, classification, invariant, metric, baseline, identity, or causal claim as if it were absolute, while that claim may actually depend on hidden relations to context, measurement frame, schema, counterparties, scale, or the wider system."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "A system is being migrated, simulated, compared, or generalized and prior assumptions about absolute properties may no longer hold."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 55, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-055", "ledger_sha256": "d9b9148377269b108a40dc43d18ae544e0d5bdb165aa2c9d8bde8bc3e3b25408"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Relevance-Substitution Detection and Correction", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:relevance_substitution_detection_and_correction", "slug": "relevance_substitution_detection_and_correction"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A recipient must update a belief, confidence, ranking, diagnosis, trust judgment, or decision, but the channel carrying psychological force is not the channel carrying epistemic relevance. The decision then becomes sensitive to cues that should not decide the matter, while relevant evidence is absent, delayed, hidden, or discounted.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A recipient must update a belief, confidence, ranking, diagnosis, trust judgment, or decision, but the channel carrying psychological force is not the channel carrying epistemic relevance. The decision then becomes sensitive to cues that should not decide the matter, while relevant evidence is absent, delayed, hidden, or discounted."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime requires a target question, claim, candidate, or decision whose proper evidence channel can be displaced.", "role_mapping": "Evaluated object -> target; belief or decision -> recipient update.", "slug": "relevance_substitution", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b055_a03_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A concrete question, claim, candidate, risk, person, product, policy, or hypothesis is being evaluated. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A concrete question, claim, candidate, risk, person, product, policy, or hypothesis is being evaluated."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Relevance Substitution", "one_liner": "A psychologically active but epistemically irrelevant signal is supplied in place of a relevant one, and the recipient updates on it blind to the substitution.", "page_ref": "prime:relevance_substitution", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Evaluated object -> target; belief or decision -> recipient update.", "slug": "relevance_substitution", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime requires a target question, claim, candidate, or decision whose proper evidence channel can be displaced."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A concrete question, claim, candidate, risk, person, product, policy, or hypothesis is being evaluated.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime distinguishes a target-relevant signal from a substitutable but irrelevant channel.", "role_mapping": "Relevance standard -> target-relevant signal.", "slug": "relevance_substitution", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b055_a03_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: There is an identifiable standard for what would make information relevant to that evaluation. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["There is an identifiable standard for what would make information relevant to that evaluation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Relevance Substitution", "one_liner": "A psychologically active but epistemically irrelevant signal is supplied in place of a relevant one, and the recipient updates on it blind to the substitution.", "page_ref": "prime:relevance_substitution", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Relevance standard -> target-relevant signal.", "slug": "relevance_substitution", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime distinguishes a target-relevant signal from a substitutable but irrelevant channel."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "There is an identifiable standard for what would make information relevant to that evaluation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The substitute channel carries psychological force through salience, authority, affect, fluency, familiarity, or institutional reward.", "role_mapping": "Persuasive cue -> substitute signal.", "slug": "relevance_substitution", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b055_a03_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A cue is salient, affectively charged, prestigious, familiar, fluent, numerically prominent, vividly analogical, socially endorsed, or institutionally rewarded. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A cue is salient, affectively charged, prestigious, familiar, fluent, numerically prominent, vividly analogical, socially endorsed, or institutionally rewarded."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Relevance Substitution", "one_liner": "A psychologically active but epistemically irrelevant signal is supplied in place of a relevant one, and the recipient updates on it blind to the substitution.", "page_ref": "prime:relevance_substitution", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Persuasive cue -> substitute signal.", "slug": "relevance_substitution", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The substitute channel carries psychological force through salience, authority, affect, fluency, familiarity, or institutional reward."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A cue is salient, affectively charged, prestigious, familiar, fluent, numerically prominent, vividly analogical, socially endorsed, or institutionally rewarded.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Treating an untested or proxy-like cue as though it bears on the target is the prime's load-bearing blind substitution.", "role_mapping": "Cue -> substituted channel; target question -> relevant channel.", "slug": "relevance_substitution", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b055_a03_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The cue is treated as if it bears on the target question even though its relevance is weak, absent, untested, confounded, or merely proxy-like. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The cue is treated as if it bears on the target question even though its relevance is weak, absent, untested, confounded, or merely proxy-like."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Relevance Substitution", "one_liner": "A psychologically active but epistemically irrelevant signal is supplied in place of a relevant one, and the recipient updates on it blind to the substitution.", "page_ref": "prime:relevance_substitution", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Cue -> substituted channel; target question -> relevant channel.", "slug": "relevance_substitution", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Treating an untested or proxy-like cue as though it bears on the target is the prime's load-bearing blind substitution."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The cue is treated as if it bears on the target question even though its relevance is weak, absent, untested, confounded, or merely proxy-like.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The correct evidence is harder to get, less vivid, less legible, less rewarded, or less immediately available than the substitute cue.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The correct evidence is harder to get, less vivid, less legible, less rewarded, or less immediately available than the substitute cue. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The correct evidence is harder to get, less vivid, less legible, less rewarded, or less immediately available than the substitute cue."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The correct evidence is harder to get, less vivid, less legible, less rewarded, or less immediately available than the substitute cue."}, {"display_text": "The cost of updating on the wrong basis is nontrivial: unfair treatment, false belief, bad allocation, distorted research, weak policy, or unsafe diagnosis.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A recipient must update a belief, confidence, ranking, diagnosis, trust judgment, or decision, but the channel carrying psychological force is not the channel carrying epistemic relevance. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The cost of updating on the wrong basis is nontrivial: unfair treatment, false belief, bad allocation, distorted research, weak policy, or unsafe diagnosis. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The cost of updating on the wrong basis is nontrivial: unfair treatment, false belief, bad allocation, distorted research, weak policy, or unsafe diagnosis.", "A recipient must update a belief, confidence, ranking, diagnosis, trust judgment, or decision, but the channel carrying psychological force is not the channel carrying epistemic relevance."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The cost of updating on the wrong basis is nontrivial: unfair treatment, false belief, bad allocation, distorted research, weak policy, or unsafe diagnosis."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 55, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-055", "ledger_sha256": "d9b9148377269b108a40dc43d18ae544e0d5bdb165aa2c9d8bde8bc3e3b25408"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Remix-Aware Rhetorical Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:remix_aware_rhetorical_design", "slug": "remix_aware_rhetorical_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A message, document, statement, image, policy, dataset, or tool will be detached from its initial container and re-used by others, but the artifact was composed as if audiences would encounter it whole, in sequence, and in the author's intended context.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A message, document, statement, image, policy, dataset, or tool will be detached from its initial container and re-used by others, but the artifact was composed as if audiences would encounter it whole, in sequence, and in the author's intended context."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime requires an artifact intended to circulate through quoting, remixing, translation, or forwarding.", "role_mapping": "Artifact -> composed output; quoted parts -> recomposable units.", "slug": "rhetorical_velocity", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b055_a04_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The artifact is likely to be quoted, screenshotted, summarized, forwarded, embedded, memed, translated, taught, litigated, criticized, or reused in advocacy. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The artifact is likely to be quoted, screenshotted, summarized, forwarded, embedded, memed, translated, taught, litigated, criticized, or reused in advocacy."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Rhetorical Velocity", "one_liner": "Compose an artefact in anticipation of how others will cut, remix, and forward its fragments.", "page_ref": "prime:rhetorical_velocity", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Artifact -> composed output; quoted parts -> recomposable units.", "slug": "rhetorical_velocity", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime requires an artifact intended to circulate through quoting, remixing, translation, or forwarding."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The artifact is likely to be quoted, screenshotted, summarized, forwarded, embedded, memed, translated, taught, litigated, criticized, or reused in advocacy.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The unit rather than the whole is the central design object because fragments carry the strongest downstream effect.", "role_mapping": "Fragments -> recomposable units; complete artifact -> source container.", "slug": "rhetorical_velocity", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b055_a04_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A message, document, statement, image, policy, dataset, or tool will be detached from its initial container and re-used by others, but the artifact was composed as if audiences would encounter it whole, in sequence, and in the author's intended context. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The strongest effect will come from fragments rather than the complete artifact.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The strongest effect will come from fragments rather than the complete artifact.", "A message, document, statement, image, policy, dataset, or tool will be detached from its initial container and re-used by others, but the artifact was composed as if audiences would encounter it whole, in sequence, and in the author's intended context."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Rhetorical Velocity", "one_liner": "Compose an artefact in anticipation of how others will cut, remix, and forward its fragments.", "page_ref": "prime:rhetorical_velocity", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Fragments -> recomposable units; complete artifact -> source container.", "slug": "rhetorical_velocity", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The unit rather than the whole is the central design object because fragments carry the strongest downstream effect."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The strongest effect will come from fragments rather than the complete artifact.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "An uncontrolled downstream network with its own incentives to mutate and repurpose the artifact is mandatory.", "role_mapping": "Downstream actors -> recomposers; compression and sensationalism -> mutations.", "slug": "rhetorical_velocity", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b055_a04_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Different downstream actors have incentives to compress, sensationalize, decontextualize, or repurpose the material. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Different downstream actors have incentives to compress, sensationalize, decontextualize, or repurpose the material."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Rhetorical Velocity", "one_liner": "Compose an artefact in anticipation of how others will cut, remix, and forward its fragments.", "page_ref": "prime:rhetorical_velocity", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Downstream actors -> recomposers; compression and sensationalism -> mutations.", "slug": "rhetorical_velocity", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "An uncontrolled downstream network with its own incentives to mutate and repurpose the artifact is mandatory."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Different downstream actors have incentives to compress, sensationalize, decontextualize, or repurpose the material.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime combines intended circulation with fragment integrity, licensing, and provenance.", "role_mapping": "Reuse goal -> circulation; attribution and scope -> provenance and integrity.", "slug": "rhetorical_velocity", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b055_a04_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The author wants reuse, adoption, citation, or dissemination but wants to preserve attribution, scope, and claim integrity. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The author wants reuse, adoption, citation, or dissemination but wants to preserve attribution, scope, and claim integrity."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Rhetorical Velocity", "one_liner": "Compose an artefact in anticipation of how others will cut, remix, and forward its fragments.", "page_ref": "prime:rhetorical_velocity", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Reuse goal -> circulation; attribution and scope -> provenance and integrity.", "slug": "rhetorical_velocity", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime combines intended circulation with fragment integrity, licensing, and provenance."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The author wants reuse, adoption, citation, or dissemination but wants to preserve attribution, scope, and claim integrity.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P093-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a source communication and a fragment, preview, label, excerpt, or equivalent derived surface.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A complete communication artifact has one or more derived surfaces or fragments.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a source-to-fragment relation rather than an unrelated secondary message.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The derived surface carries content from or about the source communication.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail independent travel or encounter, not a fragment that is always consumed inside the full artifact.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The derived surface will circulate independently of the complete source artifact.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "A communication surface contains derived fragments that will travel independently of the full communication artifact.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "communication fragments travel independently of their source artifact", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P093-C01-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Rhetorical velocity is substrate-neutral and need not involve previews, alt text, transcripts, or share cards.", "slug": "rhetorical_velocity"}], "residual_id": "r:remix_aware_rhetorical_design:b055_a04_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b055_a04_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The communication surface includes platform previews, metadata, headings, captions, transcripts, alt text, pull-quotes, or share cards that will travel independently. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The communication surface includes platform previews, metadata, headings, captions, transcripts, alt text, pull-quotes, or share cards that will travel independently."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Coding that preserves every fragment inside its full narrative would falsify independent circulation, but it is outside overcoding because the exact failure requires phrases lifted out of context and used at codebook or frequency grain.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Overcoding", "one_liner": "The qualitative-research failure mode where coding fragments material below the phenomenon's legibility grain, actively severing the sequence and relational structure that gave coded phrases their meaning — diagnosed by whether meaning can be reconstructed from the codes alone.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:overcoding", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "overcoding"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "overcoding", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P093-C01-U1", "why_it_fits": "The candidate directly instantiates a complete communication decomposed into content-bearing fragments that are lifted from source context and then filed, counted, or reported at fragment grain. Independent fragment use is constitutive of the failure, not optional aftermath."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The communication surface includes platform previews, metadata, headings, captions, transcripts, alt text, pull-quotes, or share cards that will travel independently.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The cost of misquotation or missing context is high enough that downstream reuse must be designed rather than left to goodwill.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Reuse requires detachability, but meaning requires context. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The cost of misquotation or missing context is high enough that downstream reuse must be designed rather than left to goodwill. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The cost of misquotation or missing context is high enough that downstream reuse must be designed rather than left to goodwill.", "Reuse requires detachability, but meaning requires context."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The cost of misquotation or missing context is high enough that downstream reuse must be designed rather than left to goodwill."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 55, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-055", "ledger_sha256": "d9b9148377269b108a40dc43d18ae544e0d5bdb165aa2c9d8bde8bc3e3b25408"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Rent-Seeking Channel Closure", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:rent_seeking_channel_closure", "slug": "rent_seeking_channel_closure"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 7 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 7}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system must allocate scarce value, access, protection, money, permission, status, visibility, or rights, but the allocation rules can be influenced or gamed. Actors therefore spend real resources on shaping the rules, cultivating gatekeepers, defending privileges, or blocking rivals instead of producing new value. The result is deadweight contest cost, incumbent advantage, exclusion, regulatory capture, public distrust, and lower productive output.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system must allocate scarce value, access, protection, money, permission, status, visibility, or rights, but the allocation rules can be influenced or gamed. Actors therefore spend real resources on shaping the rules, cultivating gatekeepers, defending privileges, or blocking rivals instead of producing new value. The result is deadweight contest cost, incumbent advantage, exclusion, regulatory capture, public distrust, and lower productive output."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime begins with an allocation channel such as a permit, subsidy, ranking, office, quota, or privilege.", "role_mapping": "License or priority -> allocation channel; scarce value -> existing stream.", "slug": "rent_seeking", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b055_a05_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system must allocate scarce value, access, protection, money, permission, status, visibility, or rights, but the allocation rules can be influenced or gamed. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A valuable allocation channel exists: license, permit, subsidy, quota, tariff, contract, procurement score, standard, platform ranking, credential, budget line, exemption, priority queue, or access right.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A valuable allocation channel exists: license, permit, subsidy, quota, tariff, contract, procurement score, standard, platform ranking, credential, budget line, exemption, priority queue, or access right.", "A system must allocate scarce value, access, protection, money, permission, status, visibility, or rights, but the allocation rules can be influenced or gamed."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Rent Seeking", "one_liner": "Expending real resources to capture a larger share of existing value by working the rules that govern allocation, rather than to produce new value.", "page_ref": "prime:rent_seeking", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "License or priority -> allocation channel; scarce value -> existing stream.", "slug": "rent_seeking", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime begins with an allocation channel such as a permit, subsidy, ranking, office, quota, or privilege."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A valuable allocation channel exists: license, permit, subsidy, quota, tariff, contract, procurement score, standard, platform ranking, credential, budget line, exemption, priority queue, or access right.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a bifurcation between productive effort and channel-directed distributive effort whose relative payoff drives the contest.", "role_mapping": "Influence payoff -> distributive path; better service -> productive path.", "slug": "rent_seeking", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b055_a05_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system must allocate scarce value, access, protection, money, permission, status, visibility, or rights, but the allocation rules can be influenced or gamed. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The private payoff from influencing the allocation rule is higher than the expected payoff from producing better value, quality, service, safety, innovation, or cost reduction.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The private payoff from influencing the allocation rule is higher than the expected payoff from producing better value, quality, service, safety, innovation, or cost reduction.", "A system must allocate scarce value, access, protection, money, permission, status, visibility, or rights, but the allocation rules can be influenced or gamed."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Rent Seeking", "one_liner": "Expending real resources to capture a larger share of existing value by working the rules that govern allocation, rather than to produce new value.", "page_ref": "prime:rent_seeking", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Influence payoff -> distributive path; better service -> productive path.", "slug": "rent_seeking", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a bifurcation between productive effort and channel-directed distributive effort whose relative payoff drives the contest."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The private payoff from influencing the allocation rule is higher than the expected payoff from producing better value, quality, service, safety, innovation, or cost reduction.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Rent-seeking can target a simple transparent rule; discretion and complex insider process are not mandatory.", "slug": "rent_seeking"}], "residual_id": "r:rent_seeking_channel_closure:b055_a05_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b055_a05_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Rules contain discretion, opacity, exceptions, complex process, insider language, incumbent-specific criteria, or weak review paths. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Rules contain discretion, opacity, exceptions, complex process, insider language, incumbent-specific criteria, or weak review paths."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Rent-seeking can target a simple transparent rule; discretion and complex insider process are not mandatory.", "slug": "rent_seeking"}], "normalized_requirement": "Rules contain discretion, opacity, exceptions, complex process, insider language, incumbent-specific criteria, or weak review paths.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Rules contain discretion, opacity, exceptions, complex process, insider language, incumbent-specific criteria, or weak review paths.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Contestants on both sides can be concentrated and equally organized.", "slug": "rent_seeking"}], "residual_id": "r:rent_seeking_channel_closure:b055_a05_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b055_a05_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Beneficiaries have concentrated incentives to defend the rent, while payers, users, entrants, or affected outsiders have diffuse incentives and weak voice. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Beneficiaries have concentrated incentives to defend the rent, while payers, users, entrants, or affected outsiders have diffuse incentives and weak voice."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Contestants on both sides can be concentrated and equally organized.", "slug": "rent_seeking"}], "normalized_requirement": "Beneficiaries have concentrated incentives to defend the rent, while payers, users, entrants, or affected outsiders have diffuse incentives and weak voice.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Beneficiaries have concentrated incentives to defend the rent, while payers, users, entrants, or affected outsiders have diffuse incentives and weak voice.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P093-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve gatekeeper and beneficiary roles connected through a controlled channel.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A gatekeeper controls or influences an allocation, access, permission, protection, status, or rule channel that has beneficiaries.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail beneficiary-to-gatekeeper dependency, not merely contact or information exchange.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The gatekeeper depends on a resource, capability, opportunity, or legitimacy supplied by those beneficiaries.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must admit the full dependency family, including future employment, without requiring support to perform the gatekeeping role.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The dependency object is a beneficiary-supplied resource, opportunity, capability, support, or form of legitimacy.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}], "predicate": "A gatekeeper depends on beneficiaries of its decisions for resources, opportunities, capabilities, support, or legitimacy.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "gatekeeper depends on beneficiary-supplied resources or legitimacy", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P093-C02-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The allocation channel may be algorithmic or rule-bound with no dependent human gatekeeper.", "slug": "rent_seeking"}], "residual_id": "r:rent_seeking_channel_closure:b055_a05_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b055_a05_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Gatekeepers depend on beneficiaries for expertise, data, campaign support, future employment, implementation capacity, or informal legitimacy. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Gatekeepers depend on beneficiaries for expertise, data, campaign support, future employment, implementation capacity, or informal legitimacy."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A donation-funded outlet without advertiser, owner, or source leverage would be a counterexample to the broad topic, but it is outside the exact five-filter commercial-media model retained here.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Propaganda Model", "one_liner": "Explain patterned media bias structurally rather than by motive — five institutional filters (ownership, advertising, sourcing, flak, ideological premise) shape every story before publication, so the slant is a property of the constraints, not anyone's intent.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:propaganda_model", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "propaganda_model"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "propaganda_model", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P093-C02-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact model directly entails content gatekeeping whose beneficiary-sensitive choices depend on capital, advertising revenue, and information access supplied by owners, advertisers, and official sources."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Gatekeepers depend on beneficiaries for expertise, data, campaign support, future employment, implementation capacity, or informal legitimacy.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires rent-seeking to provoke a resource-consuming counter-contest from threatened parties.", "role_mapping": "Defensive rival spending -> counter-contest; escalation -> dissipation.", "slug": "rent_seeking", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b055_a05_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Actors therefore spend real resources on shaping the rules, cultivating gatekeepers, defending privileges, or blocking rivals instead of producing new value. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Defensive spending by rivals or outsiders escalates because no party can safely ignore the rent contest.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Defensive spending by rivals or outsiders escalates because no party can safely ignore the rent contest.", "Actors therefore spend real resources on shaping the rules, cultivating gatekeepers, defending privileges, or blocking rivals instead of producing new value."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Rent Seeking", "one_liner": "Expending real resources to capture a larger share of existing value by working the rules that govern allocation, rather than to produce new value.", "page_ref": "prime:rent_seeking", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Defensive rival spending -> counter-contest; escalation -> dissipation.", "slug": "rent_seeking", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires rent-seeking to provoke a resource-consuming counter-contest from threatened parties."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Defensive spending by rivals or outsiders escalates because no party can safely ignore the rent contest.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The captured object is a share of an existing value stream rather than newly produced value.", "role_mapping": "Transfer or protection -> existing pie; no new production -> distributive direction.", "slug": "rent_seeking", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b055_a05_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system must allocate scarce value, access, protection, money, permission, status, visibility, or rights, but the allocation rules can be influenced or gamed. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The captured value is mostly a transfer or protection of existing value rather than a reward for new production or risk-bearing.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The captured value is mostly a transfer or protection of existing value rather than a reward for new production or risk-bearing.", "A system must allocate scarce value, access, protection, money, permission, status, visibility, or rights, but the allocation rules can be influenced or gamed."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Rent Seeking", "one_liner": "Expending real resources to capture a larger share of existing value by working the rules that govern allocation, rather than to produce new value.", "page_ref": "prime:rent_seeking", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Transfer or protection -> existing pie; no new production -> distributive direction.", "slug": "rent_seeking", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The captured object is a share of an existing value stream rather than newly produced value."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The captured value is mostly a transfer or protection of existing value rather than a reward for new production or risk-bearing.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 55, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-055", "ledger_sha256": "d9b9148377269b108a40dc43d18ae544e0d5bdb165aa2c9d8bde8bc3e3b25408"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Reopened Malleability Window", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:reopened_malleability_window", "slug": "reopened_malleability_window"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 2 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 2}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a mismatch between the desired update and the receiving system’s current update regime. The target may be well defined and the corrective input may be available, yet the stabilized system does not incorporate it in the desired way. Simply increasing exposure can consume time and burden without altering the underlying response. At the same time, interventions capable of loosening stability create a more dangerous problem: the system becomes writable before it becomes correctly rewritten.\n\nThis produces four coupled uncertainties. First, is the system actually closed or merely underserved? Second, did the trigger change capacity or merely produce activation, expectancy, arousal, disinhibition, or practice? Third, did the intended input enter the opened system selectively, or did collateral signals enter as well? Fourth, did the desired configuration re-stabilize and transfer, or did the system remain unstable or return to its prior state?\n\nThe parent Critical-Window Intervention Timing handles the ordinary case in which a high-receptivity interval exists and intervention should be aligned with it. Reopening is structurally different because the design intentionally perturbs the stabilizing regime. Candidate selection, induction, labile-state control, and safe reclosure become first-class obligations. The intervention can fail before target training begins, can create harm even when target performance improves, and can require rescue specifically because the system’s capacity state was altered.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A desired configuration, association, skill, response, or functional pathway is difficult to alter because the receiving system has passed from a high-malleability state into a stabilized or constrained one. Ordinary late training, repeated instruction, or compensation may improve performance without restoring the underlying capacity to update. A proposed trigger may transiently increase editability, but unless the trigger, capacity change, target input, non-target effects, and re-stabilization are governed as separate stages, the intervention can mistake arousal for plasticity, destabilize without correction, amplify the wrong input, or create broad and durable harm."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime requires a bounded malleability window followed by a qualitative post-closure asymmetry in acquisition cost.", "role_mapping": "Stabilized target -> post-closure state; reduced malleability -> acquisition asymmetry.", "slug": "critical_period", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b055_a06_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "There must be a defensible reason to believe that reduced malleability, rather than insufficient access, dose, motivation, practice, measurement quality, or an incorrect target, is part of the constraint. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A defensible baseline shows materially reduced malleability or a stabilized target pattern, not merely low motivation, poor access, insufficient dose, fatigue, or lack of practice.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A defensible baseline shows materially reduced malleability or a stabilized target pattern, not merely low motivation, poor access, insufficient dose, fatigue, or lack of practice.", "There must be a defensible reason to believe that reduced malleability, rather than insufficient access, dose, motivation, practice, measurement quality, or an incorrect target, is part of the constraint."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Critical Period", "one_liner": "A time-gated window of elevated malleability during which a configuration can be acquired, after which the same inputs are far harder or impossible to take on.", "page_ref": "prime:critical_period", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Stabilized target -> post-closure state; reduced malleability -> acquisition asymmetry.", "slug": "critical_period", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime requires a bounded malleability window followed by a qualitative post-closure asymmetry in acquisition cost."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A defensible baseline shows materially reduced malleability or a stabilized target pattern, not merely low motivation, poor access, insufficient dose, fatigue, or lack of practice.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Post-closure learning is harder or impossible, but ordinary training need not have been tested and no risk-benefit judgment is entailed.", "slug": "critical_period"}], "residual_id": "r:reopened_malleability_window:b055_a06_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b055_a06_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Ordinary late training, repeated instruction, or compensation may improve performance without restoring the underlying capacity to update. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Ordinary training or compensation has been tested or is predictably insufficient for the underlying target, and the expected benefit justifies added risk.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Ordinary training or compensation has been tested or is predictably insufficient for the underlying target, and the expected benefit justifies added risk.", "Ordinary late training, repeated instruction, or compensation may improve performance without restoring the underlying capacity to update."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Post-closure learning is harder or impossible, but ordinary training need not have been tested and no risk-benefit judgment is entailed.", "slug": "critical_period"}], "normalized_requirement": "Ordinary training or compensation has been tested or is predictably insufficient for the underlying target, and the expected benefit justifies added risk.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Ordinary training or compensation has been tested or is predictably insufficient for the underlying target, and the expected benefit justifies added risk.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A specific intervention is hypothesized to change capacity to change, rather than simply supply more target input or improve immediate performance.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The intervention can fail before target training begins, can create harm even when target performance improves, and can require rescue specifically because the system’s capacity state was altered. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: A specific intervention is hypothesized to change capacity to change, rather than simply supply more target input or improve immediate performance. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A specific intervention is hypothesized to change capacity to change, rather than simply supply more target input or improve immediate performance.", "The intervention can fail before target training begins, can create harm even when target performance improves, and can require rescue specifically because the system’s capacity state was altered."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "A specific intervention is hypothesized to change capacity to change, rather than simply supply more target input or improve immediate performance."}, {"display_text": "The opening signal, induced labile interval, target input, re-stabilization, and delayed outcomes can be observed or bounded separately enough to support stop and rescue decisions.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use is strongest when the trigger, opening signal, target input, re-stabilization, and delayed outcome can be observed separately. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: The opening signal, induced labile interval, target input, re-stabilization, and delayed outcomes can be observed or bounded separately enough to support stop and rescue decisions. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The opening signal, induced labile interval, target input, re-stabilization, and delayed outcomes can be observed or bounded separately enough to support stop and rescue decisions.", "Use is strongest when the trigger, opening signal, target input, re-stabilization, and delayed outcome can be observed separately."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The opening signal, induced labile interval, target input, re-stabilization, and delayed outcomes can be observed or bounded separately enough to support stop and rescue decisions."}, {"display_text": "Non-target plasticity, interference, distress, functional loss, or maladaptive learning can be monitored with meaningful comparators and follow-up.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The design must create enough lability for targeted change without making the system broadly writable, and must close the induced interval only after the desired pattern—not noise, coercion, or collateral learning—has been stabilized. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: Non-target plasticity, interference, distress, functional loss, or maladaptive learning can be monitored with meaningful comparators and follow-up. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Non-target plasticity, interference, distress, functional loss, or maladaptive learning can be monitored with meaningful comparators and follow-up.", "The design must create enough lability for targeted change without making the system broadly writable, and must close the induced interval only after the desired pattern—not noise, coercion, or collateral learning—has been stabilized."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Non-target plasticity, interference, distress, functional loss, or maladaptive learning can be monitored with meaningful comparators and follow-up."}, {"display_text": "Qualified oversight, consent or assent, burden limits, fallback support, and domain-appropriate adverse-event response are available.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Simply increasing exposure can consume time and burden without altering the underlying response. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: Qualified oversight, consent or assent, burden limits, fallback support, and domain-appropriate adverse-event response are available. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Qualified oversight, consent or assent, burden limits, fallback support, and domain-appropriate adverse-event response are available.", "Simply increasing exposure can consume time and burden without altering the underlying response."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Qualified oversight, consent or assent, burden limits, fallback support, and domain-appropriate adverse-event response are available."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 55, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-055", "ledger_sha256": "d9b9148377269b108a40dc43d18ae544e0d5bdb165aa2c9d8bde8bc3e3b25408"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Repairability and Maintainability Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:repairability_and_maintainability_design", "slug": "repairability_and_maintainability_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 4 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is launch-centered design. The solution is optimized to work now, look clean, minimize initial cost, or preserve tight control, but it lacks the structures needed for care over time. The result is a brittle operating object: small faults require large replacements, routine maintenance becomes heroic work, and future users inherit a system that can fail but cannot be restored.\n\nThis problem appears when faults are hidden, parts are sealed, documentation is stale, repair permissions are unclear, spare resources are unavailable, or validation after repair is missing. It also appears in social and organizational systems: a process may work while one expert remains in the room, then break when that person leaves because the repair path was never made explicit.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A solution functions at launch but becomes brittle, expensive, unsafe, wasteful, or impossible to restore because diagnosis, access, replaceability, documentation, ownership, or spare resources were not designed in."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Maintenance is defined by inevitable degradation acting on a system over time and sustained work to preserve function.", "role_mapping": "Long operation -> maintained system; wear and drift -> degradation trajectory.", "slug": "maintenance", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The prime directly entails time-driven loss of function or fidelity across physical, informational, and institutional substrates.", "role_mapping": "Wear, drift, data decay, turnover -> temporal degradation.", "slug": "temporal_decay_and_degradation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b055_a07_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is also useful when the people who will maintain the solution are not the same people who created it. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The solution will operate over time and therefore face wear, failure, drift, contamination, data decay, version change, staff turnover, policy change, supply disruption, or contextual shift.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The solution will operate over time and therefore face wear, failure, drift, contamination, data decay, version change, staff turnover, policy change, supply disruption, or contextual shift.", "It is also useful when the people who will maintain the solution are not the same people who created it."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Maintenance", "one_liner": "Sustained preventive work that keeps a system's intended function intact against inevitable degradation, acting ahead of failure rather than repairing after it.", "page_ref": "prime:maintenance", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Long operation -> maintained system; wear and drift -> degradation trajectory.", "slug": "maintenance", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Maintenance is defined by inevitable degradation acting on a system over time and sustained work to preserve function."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Temporal Decay and Degradation", "one_liner": "System properties or capabilities systematically diminish over time.", "page_ref": "prime:temporal_decay_and_degradation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Wear, drift, data decay, turnover -> temporal degradation.", "slug": "temporal_decay_and_degradation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime directly entails time-driven loss of function or fidelity across physical, informational, and institutional substrates."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The solution will operate over time and therefore face wear, failure, drift, contamination, data decay, version change, staff turnover, policy change, supply disruption, or contextual shift.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Lifecycle adaptability supports partial modification but does not require whole replacement to be especially costly.", "slug": "design_for_lifecycle_adaptability"}], "residual_id": "r:repairability_and_maintainability_design:b055_a07_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b055_a07_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The cost of whole-system replacement is high relative to the cost of local restoration. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The cost of whole-system replacement is high relative to the cost of local restoration."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Lifecycle adaptability supports partial modification but does not require whole replacement to be especially costly.", "slug": "design_for_lifecycle_adaptability"}], "normalized_requirement": "The cost of whole-system replacement is high relative to the cost of local restoration.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The cost of whole-system replacement is high relative to the cost of local restoration.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P093-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the solution, original-team, and successor-caregiver roles.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A solution has an original design team and a later caregiver capable of maintenance, operation, use, or support.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a future care requirement rather than merely possible contact with the solution.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The later caregiver will need to care for the solution.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail post-exit care rather than maintenance performed while the original designers remain responsible and available.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The care requirement persists after the original design team is gone.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "A successor caregiver will need to maintain or support a solution after its original design team is gone.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "successor caregivers inherit solution care after designers exit", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P093-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Maintenance can be performed by the original designer and does not require staff turnover.", "slug": "maintenance"}], "residual_id": "r:repairability_and_maintainability_design:b055_a07_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b055_a07_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is also useful when the people who will maintain the solution are not the same people who created it. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Maintainers, operators, users, support teams, or successors will need to care for the solution after the original design team is gone.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Maintainers, operators, users, support teams, or successors will need to care for the solution after the original design team is gone.", "It is also useful when the people who will maintain the solution are not the same people who created it."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Maintenance can be performed by the original designer and does not require staff turnover.", "slug": "maintenance"}], "normalized_requirement": "Maintainers, operators, users, support teams, or successors will need to care for the solution after the original design team is gone.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Maintainers, operators, users, support teams, or successors will need to care for the solution after the original design team is gone.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Maintenance is preventive work before failure and explicitly is not repair after failure.", "slug": "maintenance"}], "residual_id": "r:repairability_and_maintainability_design:b055_a07_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b055_a07_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Failure modes are not all preventable, so restoration must be planned rather than improvised. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Failure modes are not all preventable, so restoration must be planned rather than improvised."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Maintenance is preventive work before failure and explicitly is not repair after failure.", "slug": "maintenance"}], "normalized_requirement": "Failure modes are not all preventable, so restoration must be planned rather than improvised.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Failure modes are not all preventable, so restoration must be planned rather than improvised.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Downtime, unsafe repair, service interruption, waste, or locked-in dependency would create significant harm.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when a solution will remain in service after launch and failure, degradation, or routine upkeep would otherwise create avoidable downtime, waste, dependence, safety risk, or expensive replacement. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Downtime, unsafe repair, service interruption, waste, or locked-in dependency would create significant harm. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Downtime, unsafe repair, service interruption, waste, or locked-in dependency would create significant harm.", "Use this archetype when a solution will remain in service after launch and failure, degradation, or routine upkeep would otherwise create avoidable downtime, waste, dependence, safety risk, or expensive replacement."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Downtime, unsafe repair, service interruption, waste, or locked-in dependency would create significant harm."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 55, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-055", "ledger_sha256": "d9b9148377269b108a40dc43d18ae544e0d5bdb165aa2c9d8bde8bc3e3b25408"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Representation Fit Selection", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:representation_fit_selection", "slug": "representation_fit_selection"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A problem is represented in a form that hides relevant structure, overemphasizes irrelevant detail, or misleads decision-making. The same underlying situation may look like a ranking problem in a table, a spatial problem on a map, a flow problem in a process diagram, a causal problem in a loop diagram, or a human-impact problem in a narrative. If the representation is poorly fitted to the task, users may make the wrong comparison even when the underlying information is available.\n\nCommon symptoms include exact numbers without pattern visibility, polished visuals that conceal uncertainty, models whose assumptions are opaque, and stakeholders arguing from incompatible views of the same situation.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A problem is represented in a form that hides relevant structure, overemphasizes irrelevant detail, or misleads decision-making."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A representation requires one target and one representing medium but does not require multiple available media.", "slug": "representation"}], "residual_id": "r:representation_fit_selection:b055_a08_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b055_a08_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "**The same situation can be shown as a table, chart, map, model, narrative, prototype, schema, or diagram..* Each form preserves different information and invites different inferences. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The same situation can be shown as a table, chart, map, model, narrative, prototype, schema, or diagram.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The same situation can be shown as a table, chart, map, model, narrative, prototype, schema, or diagram.", "**The same situation can be shown as a table, chart, map, model, narrative, prototype, schema, or diagram..* Each form preserves different information and invites different inferences."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A representation requires one target and one representing medium but does not require multiple available media.", "slug": "representation"}], "normalized_requirement": "The same situation can be shown as a table, chart, map, model, narrative, prototype, schema, or diagram.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The same situation can be shown as a table, chart, map, model, narrative, prototype, schema, or diagram.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A bounded approximation can support correct decisions and need not create a misleading comparison.", "slug": "approximation"}], "residual_id": "r:representation_fit_selection:b055_a08_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b055_a08_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "**A representation makes the problem look simple but users keep making the wrong comparison or decision..* The form may be hiding the task-relevant relation or encouraging false equivalence. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A representation makes the problem look simple but users keep making the wrong comparison or decision.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A representation makes the problem look simple but users keep making the wrong comparison or decision.", "**A representation makes the problem look simple but users keep making the wrong comparison or decision..* The form may be hiding the task-relevant relation or encouraging false equivalence."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A bounded approximation can support correct decisions and need not create a misleading comparison.", "slug": "approximation"}], "normalized_requirement": "A representation makes the problem look simple but users keep making the wrong comparison or decision.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A representation makes the problem look simple but users keep making the wrong comparison or decision.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Approximation requires an error estimate and tolerance; it does not entail reliance on a familiar default.", "slug": "approximation"}], "residual_id": "r:representation_fit_selection:b055_a08_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b055_a08_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "**A familiar template or tool default is being used without checking whether it fits the current task..* Default representations often optimize convenience, not structural fidelity. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A familiar template or tool default is being used without checking whether it fits the current task.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A familiar template or tool default is being used without checking whether it fits the current task.", "**A familiar template or tool default is being used without checking whether it fits the current task..* Default representations often optimize convenience, not structural fidelity."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Approximation requires an error estimate and tolerance; it does not entail reliance on a familiar default.", "slug": "approximation"}], "normalized_requirement": "A familiar template or tool default is being used without checking whether it fits the current task.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A familiar template or tool default is being used without checking whether it fits the current task.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Approximation preserves the same kind of object with quantified error; compression for attention may instead be abstraction with no error claim.", "slug": "approximation"}], "residual_id": "r:representation_fit_selection:b055_a08_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b055_a08_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "**A representation must compress a complex situation for limited attention, time, or data..* Compression should be guided by task-relevant loss, not arbitrary simplification. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A representation must compress a complex situation for limited attention, time, or data.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A representation must compress a complex situation for limited attention, time, or data.", "**A representation must compress a complex situation for limited attention, time, or data..* Compression should be guided by task-relevant loss, not arbitrary simplification."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Approximation preserves the same kind of object with quantified error; compression for attention may instead be abstraction with no error claim.", "slug": "approximation"}], "normalized_requirement": "A representation must compress a complex situation for limited attention, time, or data.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A representation must compress a complex situation for limited attention, time, or data.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Stakeholders disagree because they are using different views of the same underlying situation.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "**Stakeholders disagree because they are using different views of the same underlying situation..* The conflict may be representational rather than substantive. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Stakeholders disagree because they are using different views of the same underlying situation. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders disagree because they are using different views of the same underlying situation.", "**Stakeholders disagree because they are using different views of the same underlying situation..* The conflict may be representational rather than substantive."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Stakeholders disagree because they are using different views of the same underlying situation."}, {"display_text": "The representation is becoming a governance artifact, public communication, model input, or operational interface.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "**The representation is becoming a governance artifact, public communication, model input, or operational interface..* A poor representation can scale bad interpretation across many decisions. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: The representation is becoming a governance artifact, public communication, model input, or operational interface. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The representation is becoming a governance artifact, public communication, model input, or operational interface.", "**The representation is becoming a governance artifact, public communication, model input, or operational interface..* A poor representation can scale bad interpretation across many decisions."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The representation is becoming a governance artifact, public communication, model input, or operational interface."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 55, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-055", "ledger_sha256": "d9b9148377269b108a40dc43d18ae544e0d5bdb165aa2c9d8bde8bc3e3b25408"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Representation-Independent Interface Contract", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:representation_independent_interface_contract", "slug": "representation_independent_interface_contract"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 5 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Clients need to use or replace a component without knowing its internal representation, but the component is currently described by implementation detail, examples, storage layout, informal convention, or a partial API. As a result, clients couple to accidental internals, alternative implementations diverge, optimization becomes dangerous, and the system cannot tell whether a replacement really preserves behavior.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Clients need to use or replace a component without knowing its internal representation, but the component is currently described by implementation detail, examples, storage layout, informal convention, or a partial API. As a result, clients couple to accidental internals, alternative implementations diverge, optimization becomes dangerous, and the system cannot tell whether a replacement really preserves behavior."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid ADT forbids contract clients from relying on internals; the condition describes the motivating violation, not the prime instance.", "slug": "abstract_data_type"}], "residual_id": "r:representation_independent_interface_contract:b055_a09_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b055_a09_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A leaky representation turns hidden state into an implicit interface. In this condition set, the requirement is: Clients are tempted to inspect, infer, or rely on internal representation details.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Clients are tempted to inspect, infer, or rely on internal representation details."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid ADT forbids contract clients from relying on internals; the condition describes the motivating violation, not the prime instance.", "slug": "abstract_data_type"}], "normalized_requirement": "Clients are tempted to inspect, infer, or rely on internal representation details.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Clients are tempted to inspect, infer, or rely on internal representation details.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A behavioral contract can specify a stateless abstraction.", "slug": "abstract_data_type"}], "residual_id": "r:representation_independent_interface_contract:b055_a09_c3", "residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b055_a09_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Operation sequences, invariants, and allowed transitions must be part of the contract. In this condition set, the requirement is: A component has stateful behavior rather than a single stateless function.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A component has stateful behavior rather than a single stateless function."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A behavioral contract can specify a stateless abstraction.", "slug": "abstract_data_type"}], "normalized_requirement": "A component has stateful behavior rather than a single stateless function.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "NON_PRIME_QUALIFIER", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A component has stateful behavior rather than a single stateless function.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid interface can fully specify its contract and need not omit those terms.", "slug": "interface"}], "residual_id": "r:representation_independent_interface_contract:b055_a09_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b055_a09_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Syntax alone is not enough for safe substitution. In this condition set, the requirement is: The public interface exists but does not specify laws, edge cases, error semantics, side effects, or performance caveats.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The public interface exists but does not specify laws, edge cases, error semantics, side effects, or performance caveats."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid interface can fully specify its contract and need not omit those terms.", "slug": "interface"}], "normalized_requirement": "The public interface exists but does not specify laws, edge cases, error semantics, side effects, or performance caveats.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The public interface exists but does not specify laws, edge cases, error semantics, side effects, or performance caveats.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact discipline prevents accidental dependence and therefore does not entail an already-blocked migration.", "slug": "abstract_data_type"}], "residual_id": "r:representation_independent_interface_contract:b055_a09_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b055_a09_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The archetype re-establishes the boundary clients are allowed to rely on. In this condition set, the requirement is: Implementation optimization, migration, or refactoring is blocked by downstream dependence on accidental behavior.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Implementation optimization, migration, or refactoring is blocked by downstream dependence on accidental behavior."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact discipline prevents accidental dependence and therefore does not entail an already-blocked migration.", "slug": "abstract_data_type"}], "normalized_requirement": "Implementation optimization, migration, or refactoring is blocked by downstream dependence on accidental behavior.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Implementation optimization, migration, or refactoring is blocked by downstream dependence on accidental behavior.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires externally verifiable conformance and guarantees interchangeability without internal audit.", "role_mapping": "Black-box tests -> conformance relation; implementation -> hidden occupant.", "slug": "abstract_data_type", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b055_a09_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The same behavioral oracle can govern many implementations. In this condition set, the requirement is: Black-box conformance is preferable to auditing every implementation internally.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Black-box conformance is preferable to auditing every implementation internally."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Abstract Data Type", "one_liner": "Specify a component by its externally observable behaviour while suppressing its implementation, so any conforming implementation is interchangeable behind the contract.", "page_ref": "prime:abstract_data_type", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Black-box tests -> conformance relation; implementation -> hidden occupant.", "slug": "abstract_data_type", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires externally verifiable conformance and guarantees interchangeability without internal audit."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Black-box conformance is preferable to auditing every implementation internally.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Multiple implementations, versions, suppliers, subclasses, backends, or teams may provide the same component.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Substitutability only becomes governable when the shared contract is representation-independent. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Multiple implementations, versions, suppliers, subclasses, backends, or teams may provide the same component. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Multiple implementations, versions, suppliers, subclasses, backends, or teams may provide the same component.", "Substitutability only becomes governable when the shared contract is representation-independent."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "Multiple implementations, versions, suppliers, subclasses, backends, or teams may provide the same component."}, {"display_text": "A platform or standard needs extension points without exposing core internals.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The ADT-like surface defines the extension contract. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: A platform or standard needs extension points without exposing core internals. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A platform or standard needs extension points without exposing core internals.", "The ADT-like surface defines the extension contract."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "A platform or standard needs extension points without exposing core internals."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 55, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-055", "ledger_sha256": "d9b9148377269b108a40dc43d18ae544e0d5bdb165aa2c9d8bde8bc3e3b25408"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Representation-Invariant Reasoning", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:representation_invariant_reasoning", "slug": "representation_invariant_reasoning"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 5, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 6 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A state, model, or object admits multiple legitimate descriptions related by a transformation, yet analysis treats representational differences as substantive or lets conclusions depend on an arbitrary gauge, coordinate system, basis, reference, label, encoding, or normalization. Redundancy inflates the apparent solution space, creates false disagreements, introduces unstable calculations, and obscures which outputs are actually observable or decision-relevant.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A state, model, or object admits multiple legitimate descriptions related by a transformation, yet analysis treats representational differences as substantive or lets conclusions depend on an arbitrary gauge, coordinate system, basis, reference, label, encoding, or normalization. Redundancy inflates the apparent solution space, creates false disagreements, introduces unstable calculations, and obscures which outputs are actually observable or decision-relevant."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Representation requires a target-medium mapping but not multiple equivalent encodings connected by a known transformation.", "slug": "representation"}], "residual_id": "r:representation_invariant_reasoning:b055_a10_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b055_a10_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A state, model, or object admits multiple legitimate descriptions related by a transformation, yet analysis treats representational differences as substantive or lets conclusions depend on an arbitrary gauge, coordinate system, basis, reference, label, encoding, or normalization. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Multiple parameter sets, coordinate descriptions, encodings, or labels represent the same underlying case.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Multiple parameter sets, coordinate descriptions, encodings, or labels represent the same underlying case.", "A state, model, or object admits multiple legitimate descriptions related by a transformation, yet analysis treats representational differences as substantive or lets conclusions depend on an arbitrary gauge, coordinate system, basis, reference, label, encoding, or normalization."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Representation requires a target-medium mapping but not multiple equivalent encodings connected by a known transformation.", "slug": "representation"}], "normalized_requirement": "Multiple parameter sets, coordinate descriptions, encodings, or labels represent the same underlying case.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Multiple parameter sets, coordinate descriptions, encodings, or labels represent the same underlying case.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P093-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a model, alternative internal descriptions, and a known transformation linking them.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A model has multiple parameter settings, coordinates, or degrees of freedom connected by one or more known transformations.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve transformation-linked representational equivalence or indistinguishability, not merely a change that alters the modeled state.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The known transformations link alternative model descriptions without supplying an independently distinct modeled state for each.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires internal degrees of freedom that represent the same underlying state or output.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The linked alternatives are redundant degrees of freedom.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires parameter values that cannot be uniquely recovered from the model's observable implications.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The linked alternatives are non-identifiable parameters.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A model contains transformation-linked redundant degrees of freedom or non-identifiable parameters.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "model contains transformation-linked redundancy or non-identifiability", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P093-C04-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A symmetric system need not contain redundant model parameters or non-identifiability.", "slug": "symmetry"}], "residual_id": "r:representation_invariant_reasoning:b055_a10_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b055_a10_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A state, model, or object admits multiple legitimate descriptions related by a transformation, yet analysis treats representational differences as substantive or lets conclusions depend on an arbitrary gauge, coordinate system, basis, reference, label, encoding, or normalization. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A model contains redundant degrees of freedom or non-identifiable parameters linked by known transformations.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A model contains redundant degrees of freedom or non-identifiable parameters linked by known transformations.", "A state, model, or object admits multiple legitimate descriptions related by a transformation, yet analysis treats representational differences as substantive or lets conclusions depend on an arbitrary gauge, coordinate system, basis, reference, label, encoding, or normalization."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A symmetric system need not contain redundant model parameters or non-identifiability.", "slug": "symmetry"}], "normalized_requirement": "A model contains redundant degrees of freedom or non-identifiable parameters linked by known transformations.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A model contains redundant degrees of freedom or non-identifiable parameters linked by known transformations.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Symmetry entails invariance of the relevant system and need not produce different intermediate numerical values.", "slug": "symmetry"}], "residual_id": "r:representation_invariant_reasoning:b055_a10_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b055_a10_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A state, model, or object admits multiple legitimate descriptions related by a transformation, yet analysis treats representational differences as substantive or lets conclusions depend on an arbitrary gauge, coordinate system, basis, reference, label, encoding, or normalization. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Analysts obtain different intermediate values after changing basis, frame, origin, phase, naming, or normalization.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Analysts obtain different intermediate values after changing basis, frame, origin, phase, naming, or normalization.", "A state, model, or object admits multiple legitimate descriptions related by a transformation, yet analysis treats representational differences as substantive or lets conclusions depend on an arbitrary gauge, coordinate system, basis, reference, label, encoding, or normalization."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Symmetry entails invariance of the relevant system and need not produce different intermediate numerical values.", "slug": "symmetry"}], "normalized_requirement": "Analysts obtain different intermediate values after changing basis, frame, origin, phase, naming, or normalization.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Analysts obtain different intermediate values after changing basis, frame, origin, phase, naming, or normalization.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Distinct systems can use one shared representation, and representations need not be equivalent.", "slug": "representation"}], "residual_id": "r:representation_invariant_reasoning:b055_a10_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b055_a10_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Comparisons across systems fail because each uses a different but potentially equivalent description. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Comparisons across systems fail because each uses a different but potentially equivalent description."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Distinct systems can use one shared representation, and representations need not be equivalent.", "slug": "representation"}], "normalized_requirement": "Comparisons across systems fail because each uses a different but potentially equivalent description.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Comparisons across systems fail because each uses a different but potentially equivalent description.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P093-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a representation, a domain, and at least two relevant regions.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A model or object is described by a representation applied across more than one region of its domain.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail local adequacy somewhere rather than a representation that fails everywhere.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The representation works adequately in one region.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve cross-region change in representational adequacy.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The same representation fails in a different region.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a singularity or undefined coordinate behavior outside the region of adequacy.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The representation becomes singular in the other region.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires multiple indistinguishable or unresolved interpretations outside the region of adequacy.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The representation becomes ambiguous in the other region.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A representation that works in one region becomes singular or ambiguous in another region.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "locally adequate representation fails singularly or ambiguously elsewhere", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P093-C05-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A representation can be global and nonsingular.", "slug": "representation"}], "residual_id": "r:representation_invariant_reasoning:b055_a10_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b055_a10_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A local representation works in one region but becomes singular or ambiguous elsewhere. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A local representation works in one region but becomes singular or ambiguous elsewhere."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A uniformly ambiguous label set would lack local adequacy, but the exact record necessarily distinguishes reliable class-interior measurement from the ambiguous boundary-zone blend.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Label Ambiguity", "one_liner": "Diagnose a headline accuracy figure as a blend of two measurements — model capability in the class interior where annotators agree, and mere adjudication agreement in the boundary zone where reasonable experts split — by stratifying metrics on the inter-annotator agreement rate.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:label_ambiguity", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "label_ambiguity"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "label_ambiguity", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P093-C05-U1", "why_it_fits": "The candidate directly satisfies the ambiguity DNF branch: one metric measures model capability adequately in the class interior but becomes an unresolved blend of capability and adjudicator convention in the boundary region."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A label equally ambiguous to designer and user would defeat local adequacy, but the exact candidate requires an unambiguous internal action compressed under the designer's prior and mis-decompressed under the user's divergent prior.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Microcopy Ambiguity", "one_liner": "The HCI failure where a terse interface label admits more than one reading, so the user decompresses it against a prior different from the designer's and acts correctly on the wrong interpretation.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:microcopy_ambiguity", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "microcopy_ambiguity"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "microcopy_ambiguity", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P093-C05-U1", "why_it_fits": "The same terse representation is adequate under the designer's assumed prior but admits unresolved readings under a user's divergent prior; every complete instance therefore satisfies the ambiguity branch."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A local representation works in one region but becomes singular or ambiguous elsewhere.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A symmetry can be correctly understood without any user reification error.", "slug": "symmetry"}], "residual_id": "r:representation_invariant_reasoning:b055_a10_c7", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b055_a10_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Downstream users may mistake a gauge-dependent quantity for an invariant observable. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Downstream users may mistake a gauge-dependent quantity for an invariant observable."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A symmetry can be correctly understood without any user reification error.", "slug": "symmetry"}], "normalized_requirement": "Downstream users may mistake a gauge-dependent quantity for an invariant observable.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Downstream users may mistake a gauge-dependent quantity for an invariant observable.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A solver needs a representative choice to become determinate, stable, or computationally tractable.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: A solver needs a representative choice to become determinate, stable, or computationally tractable. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A solver needs a representative choice to become determinate, stable, or computationally tractable."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "A solver needs a representative choice to become determinate, stable, or computationally tractable."}, {"display_text": "A symmetry may be exact only within a bounded model, scale, regime, or measurement convention.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this deployment constraint: A symmetry may be exact only within a bounded model, scale, regime, or measurement convention. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A symmetry may be exact only within a bounded model, scale, regime, or measurement convention."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 8, "text": "A symmetry may be exact only within a bounded model, scale, regime, or measurement convention."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 55, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-055", "ledger_sha256": "d9b9148377269b108a40dc43d18ae544e0d5bdb165aa2c9d8bde8bc3e3b25408"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Representation-Plane Acceptance-Envelope Expansion", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:representation_plane_acceptance_envelope_expansion", "slug": "representation_plane_acceptance_envelope_expansion"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 2 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 2}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Spatial scale and directional envelope are being changed at the same stage even though\nonly the directional envelope is deficient. A final-stage remedy therefore pays in\nresolution, package size, or downstream capacity.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Directional acceptance is deficient even though spatial content is adequate, and correcting both at the final stage would sacrifice resolution or downstream capacity."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "This branch preserves the complete remedy-free diagnostic route; goals, feasibility clauses, gates, deployment constraints, and supporting context remain outside the DNF."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "EXT001-C080", "dnf": [["EXT001-U080-O1"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"obligation_id": "EXT001-U080-O1", "predicate": "A signal or field has adequate spatial content but an insufficient directional acceptance envelope."}], "predicate": "A signal or field has adequate spatial content but an insufficient directional acceptance envelope.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A signal or field has adequate spatial content but an insufficient directional acceptance envelope.", "unit_id": "EXT001-U080"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"catalog_exhaustion": "CONDITION_LEVEL", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: A signal or field has adequate spatial content but an insufficient directional acceptance envelope.", "slug": "boundary_signal_spillover"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: A signal or field has adequate spatial content but an insufficient directional acceptance envelope.", "slug": "receptive_field"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: A signal or field has adequate spatial content but an insufficient directional acceptance envelope.", "slug": "linearization_meaning_mismatch"}], "residual_id": "EXT001:representation_plane_acceptance_envelope_expansion:C01", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding."}}, "condition_id": "ext001_representation_plane_acceptance_envelope_expansion_a01", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: A signal or field has adequate spatial content but an insufficient directional acceptance envelope.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A signal or field has adequate spatial content but an insufficient directional acceptance envelope."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: A signal or field has adequate spatial content but an insufficient directional acceptance envelope.", "slug": "boundary_signal_spillover"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: A signal or field has adequate spatial content but an insufficient directional acceptance envelope.", "slug": "receptive_field"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: A signal or field has adequate spatial content but an insufficient directional acceptance envelope.", "slug": "linearization_meaning_mismatch"}], "normalized_requirement": "A signal or field has adequate spatial content but an insufficient directional acceptance envelope.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A signal or field has adequate spatial content but an insufficient directional acceptance envelope.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "EXT001-C081", "dnf": [["EXT001-U081-O1"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"obligation_id": "EXT001-U081-O1", "predicate": "Final-stage magnification or expansion would sacrifice resolution, package size, or downstream capacity."}], "predicate": "Final-stage magnification or expansion would sacrifice resolution, package size, or downstream capacity.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Final-stage magnification or expansion would sacrifice resolution, package size, or downstream capacity.", "unit_id": "EXT001-U081"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"catalog_exhaustion": "CONDITION_LEVEL", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Final-stage magnification or expansion would sacrifice resolution, package size, or downstream capacity.", "slug": "objective_creep"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Final-stage magnification or expansion would sacrifice resolution, package size, or downstream capacity.", "slug": "last_mile_delivery"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Final-stage magnification or expansion would sacrifice resolution, package size, or downstream capacity.", "slug": "resolution_matching"}], "residual_id": "EXT001:representation_plane_acceptance_envelope_expansion:C02", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding."}}, "condition_id": "ext001_representation_plane_acceptance_envelope_expansion_a02", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: Final-stage magnification or expansion would sacrifice resolution, package size, or downstream capacity.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Final-stage magnification or expansion would sacrifice resolution, package size, or downstream capacity."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Final-stage magnification or expansion would sacrifice resolution, package size, or downstream capacity.", "slug": "objective_creep"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Final-stage magnification or expansion would sacrifice resolution, package size, or downstream capacity.", "slug": "last_mile_delivery"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Final-stage magnification or expansion would sacrifice resolution, package size, or downstream capacity.", "slug": "resolution_matching"}], "normalized_requirement": "Final-stage magnification or expansion would sacrifice resolution, package size, or downstream capacity.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Final-stage magnification or expansion would sacrifice resolution, package size, or downstream capacity.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A representation-plane transformation can change directional acceptance independently.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: A representation-plane transformation can change directional acceptance independently. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A representation-plane transformation can change directional acceptance independently.", "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "A representation-plane transformation can change directional acceptance independently."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"candidate_ledger_sha256": "96f72d2139077fd57bf795048ebef33b3fd574b20963170080ec916b5b3b92fe", "extension_id": "new-archetypes-extension-001", "ledger_id": "prime-production-v1.2-extension-001", "ledger_sha256": "9644520614744632d1d36da44b1acd77ce432852c6083eb871203521c166efce"}, "base_projection_sha256": "841e0c7f3cb8e8054475ad29a8a14745a416b4fc115559a44878b94292e673ec", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "ca09ed9fe1598ce7072755b530de5553f5ee0a7cd64ae82d9e4a4e2149a37788", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Representational Reduction and Formal Abstraction", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:representational_reduction_and_formal_abstraction", "slug": "representational_reduction_and_formal_abstraction"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 5 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A work remains trapped in literal depiction, illustration, or symbolic shorthand even though its intended inquiry concerns relation, force, rhythm, atmosphere, memory, sensation, process, or material behavior. Alternatively, forms have been stripped of reference so casually that the result lacks an inspectable relationship to its source, intent, or expressive criteria.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A work remains trapped in literal depiction, illustration, or symbolic shorthand even though its intended inquiry concerns relation, force, rhythm, atmosphere, memory, sensation, process, or material behavior. Alternatively, forms have been stripped of reference so casually that the result lacks an inspectable relationship to its source, intent, or expressive criteria."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Abstraction can be chosen affirmatively without a prior literal depiction fixing interpretation.", "slug": "abstraction_in_art"}], "residual_id": "r:representational_reduction_and_formal_abstraction:b055_a11_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b055_a11_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Literal likeness fixes interpretation too early or narrows attention to depicted objects. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Literal likeness fixes interpretation too early or narrows attention to depicted objects."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Abstraction can be chosen affirmatively without a prior literal depiction fixing interpretation.", "slug": "abstraction_in_art"}], "normalized_requirement": "Literal likeness fixes interpretation too early or narrows attention to depicted objects.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Literal likeness fixes interpretation too early or narrows attention to depicted objects.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record makes formal, affective, spatial, and relational qualities primary over mimetic depiction.", "role_mapping": "Formal qualities -> line color shape relation; lead perception -> non-mimetic emphasis.", "slug": "abstraction_in_art", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b055_a11_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The work must loosen resemblance enough for form and relation to become primary while preserving enough structural, affective, or contextual continuity that reduction is intentional rather than empty. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The artist wants structural, affective, temporal, or relational qualities to lead perception.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The artist wants structural, affective, temporal, or relational qualities to lead perception.", "The work must loosen resemblance enough for form and relation to become primary while preserving enough structural, affective, or contextual continuity that reduction is intentional rather than empty."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Abstraction in Art", "one_liner": "Remove literal representation.", "page_ref": "prime:abstraction_in_art", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Formal qualities -> line color shape relation; lead perception -> non-mimetic emphasis.", "slug": "abstraction_in_art", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record makes formal, affective, spatial, and relational qualities primary over mimetic depiction."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The artist wants structural, affective, temporal, or relational qualities to lead perception.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Pure abstraction need not retain any source motif as a generative trace.", "slug": "abstraction_in_art"}], "residual_id": "r:representational_reduction_and_formal_abstraction:b055_a11_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b055_a11_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A source motif should remain generative without remaining illustratively recognizable. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A source motif should remain generative without remaining illustratively recognizable."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Pure abstraction need not retain any source motif as a generative trace.", "slug": "abstraction_in_art"}], "normalized_requirement": "A source motif should remain generative without remaining illustratively recognizable.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A source motif should remain generative without remaining illustratively recognizable.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A finished abstract work can have clear formal organization without an explicit written invariant or brief.", "slug": "abstraction_in_art"}], "residual_id": "r:representational_reduction_and_formal_abstraction:b055_a11_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b055_a11_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Formal choices are accumulating without a declared invariant or abstraction brief. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Formal choices are accumulating without a declared invariant or abstraction brief."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A finished abstract work can have clear formal organization without an explicit written invariant or brief.", "slug": "abstraction_in_art"}], "normalized_requirement": "Formal choices are accumulating without a declared invariant or abstraction brief.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Formal choices are accumulating without a declared invariant or abstraction brief.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact prime does not require the work to seem arbitrary or its criteria to be untraceable.", "slug": "abstraction_in_art"}], "residual_id": "r:representational_reduction_and_formal_abstraction:b055_a11_c7", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b055_a11_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A nonliteral work appears arbitrary because transformations and evaluation criteria are untraceable. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A nonliteral work appears arbitrary because transformations and evaluation criteria are untraceable."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact prime does not require the work to seem arbitrary or its criteria to be untraceable.", "slug": "abstraction_in_art"}], "normalized_requirement": "A nonliteral work appears arbitrary because transformations and evaluation criteria are untraceable.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A nonliteral work appears arbitrary because transformations and evaluation criteria are untraceable.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Multiple studies need a controlled gradient from figurative to nonrepresentational form.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: Multiple studies need a controlled gradient from figurative to nonrepresentational form. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Multiple studies need a controlled gradient from figurative to nonrepresentational form."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Multiple studies need a controlled gradient from figurative to nonrepresentational form."}, {"display_text": "Viewers can identify the subject but cannot perceive the intended relation, rhythm, force, or atmosphere.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A work remains trapped in literal depiction, illustration, or symbolic shorthand even though its intended inquiry concerns relation, force, rhythm, atmosphere, memory, sensation, process, or material behavior. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Viewers can identify the subject but cannot perceive the intended relation, rhythm, force, or atmosphere. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Viewers can identify the subject but cannot perceive the intended relation, rhythm, force, or atmosphere.", "A work remains trapped in literal depiction, illustration, or symbolic shorthand even though its intended inquiry concerns relation, force, rhythm, atmosphere, memory, sensation, process, or material behavior."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Viewers can identify the subject but cannot perceive the intended relation, rhythm, force, or atmosphere."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 55, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-055", "ledger_sha256": "d9b9148377269b108a40dc43d18ae544e0d5bdb165aa2c9d8bde8bc3e3b25408"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Representative Sampling Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:representative_sampling_design", "slug": "representative_sampling_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a mismatch between the sample used for judgment and the population being judged. The sample may be easy to observe, but ease is not evidence of coverage. The missing cases may be exactly the ones that would change the decision: dissatisfied users, people blocked by the process, quiet stakeholders, remote sites, small subgroups, edge conditions, nonrespondents, rare failures, or tasks outside the benchmark’s comfort zone.\n\nThe dangerous step is often rhetorical. A team collects evidence from a subset and then speaks as if it has heard from the whole. Representative Sampling Design interrupts that move by asking: What is the whole? What is the frame? Who can enter the sample? Who cannot? Who did not respond? What claim remains legitimate after those limits are visible?", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A subset of cases is being used to make a judgment about a larger population, process, or task environment, but the path by which cases enter the subset may omit, overrepresent, or distort important parts of the target."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime requires a target population as the inferential reference frame and a selected sample standing in for it.", "role_mapping": "Observed cases -> sample; unobserved cases -> target population.", "slug": "sampling_representativeness", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b055_a12_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when a decision will generalize from observed cases to unobserved cases. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A decision-maker will generalize from observed cases to unobserved cases.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A decision-maker will generalize from observed cases to unobserved cases.", "Use this archetype when a decision will generalize from observed cases to unobserved cases."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Sampling (Representativeness)", "one_liner": "Representative subset selection.", "page_ref": "prime:sampling_representativeness", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Observed cases -> sample; unobserved cases -> target population.", "slug": "sampling_representativeness", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime requires a target population as the inferential reference frame and a selected sample standing in for it."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A decision-maker will generalize from observed cases to unobserved cases.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A representative probability sample can have a complete frame and no systematic ease-of-observation bias.", "slug": "sampling_representativeness"}], "residual_id": "r:representative_sampling_design:b055_a12_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b055_a12_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The easiest cases to observe differ systematically from the cases that matter. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The easiest cases to observe differ systematically from the cases that matter."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A representative probability sample can have a complete frame and no systematic ease-of-observation bias.", "slug": "sampling_representativeness"}], "normalized_requirement": "The easiest cases to observe differ systematically from the cases that matter.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The easiest cases to observe differ systematically from the cases that matter.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P093-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve an inferential conclusion and the heterogeneous population or environment to which it relates.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An analysis or judgment draws a conclusion from or about a set of relevant cases, participants, sites, products, or tasks.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve heterogeneity across the conclusion-relevant units.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The relevant set contains diversity rather than one homogeneous case type.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail conclusion sensitivity to heterogeneity, not diversity that is present but immaterial to the result.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "That diversity affects the conclusion.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Diversity among relevant cases, participants, sites, products, or tasks affects the conclusion drawn from them.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "case or participant diversity changes the conclusion", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P093-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The target population can be comparatively homogeneous; diversity-sensitive conclusions are not mandatory.", "slug": "sampling_representativeness"}], "residual_id": "r:representative_sampling_design:b055_a12_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b055_a12_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Stakeholder, customer, patient, site, transaction, product, or task diversity affects the conclusion. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Stakeholder, customer, patient, site, transaction, product, or task diversity affects the conclusion."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Random homogeneous undercounting would not make diversity change the conclusion, but it is outside the exact record, which requires non-random attenuation varying by severity, demographics, geography, access, or political environment.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Outbreak Underascertainment", "one_liner": "The surveillance failure in which recorded case counts fall systematically below the true count because a multi-stage detection pipeline — symptom expression, care-seeking, testing, confirmation, reporting — filters cases with biased attenuation at each layer.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:outbreak_underascertainment", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "outbreak_underascertainment"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "outbreak_underascertainment", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P093-C06-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact surveillance pyramid requires a heterogeneous true case set whose biased, non-random attenuation changes both observed composition and conclusions calibrated to it."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "If the hidden complement supported the same conclusion, diversity would not change it; the exact candidate excludes that case by requiring an impression the full evidence distribution would not support.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Cherry Picking", "one_liner": "Selectively presenting confirming evidence while suppressing disconfirming evidence from the same available population, so the offered sample gives an impression the full distribution would not support — locating the dishonesty in the selection process, not the individual data points.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:cherry_picking", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "cherry_picking"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "cherry_picking", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P093-C06-U1", "why_it_fits": "The candidate requires confirming and disconfirming diversity in one available evidence population and requires the selected subset to create a conclusion the full distribution would not support."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Stakeholder, customer, patient, site, transaction, product, or task diversity affects the conclusion.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A full census, exhaustive test, or complete review is impractical.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: A full census, exhaustive test, or complete review is impractical. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A full census, exhaustive test, or complete review is impractical."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "A full census, exhaustive test, or complete review is impractical."}, {"display_text": "A sample will be reused as evidence in policy, evaluation, design, compliance, or performance claims.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The sample may be easy to observe, but ease is not evidence of coverage. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: A sample will be reused as evidence in policy, evaluation, design, compliance, or performance claims. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A sample will be reused as evidence in policy, evaluation, design, compliance, or performance claims.", "The sample may be easy to observe, but ease is not evidence of coverage."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "A sample will be reused as evidence in policy, evaluation, design, compliance, or performance claims."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 55, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-055", "ledger_sha256": "d9b9148377269b108a40dc43d18ae544e0d5bdb165aa2c9d8bde8bc3e3b25408"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Reproducibility Protocol", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:reproducibility_protocol", "slug": "reproducibility_protocol"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is an invisible production path. A team produces a result, but the details that made it possible are scattered across memory, local files, undocumented parameter choices, tacit conventions, expired dependencies, shifting data versions, and unrecorded assumptions. Later, the result cannot be recreated or audited without guesswork.\n\nThis failure often appears as an audit scramble: people reconstruct a plausible story after the fact rather than presenting a preserved path. It also appears as version drift, where reruns silently use different inputs, code, tools, instruments, or decision criteria.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A result, decision, analysis, experiment, operational run, or artifact is treated as reliable even though the information needed to recreate or audit it has not been preserved. The result becomes dependent on memory, tacit context, fragile tooling, undocumented choices, or inaccessible inputs."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires a result plus the data, code, methods, and conditions on which it depends.", "role_mapping": "Output -> original result; data tools assumptions -> study artifact and method.", "slug": "reproducibility_replicability", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b055_a13_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A team produces a result, but the details that made it possible are scattered across memory, local files, undocumented parameter choices, tacit conventions, expired dependencies, shifting data versions, and unrecorded assumptions. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The output depends on specific data, tools, parameters, assumptions, roles, environmental conditions, or handoffs.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The output depends on specific data, tools, parameters, assumptions, roles, environmental conditions, or handoffs.", "A team produces a result, but the details that made it possible are scattered across memory, local files, undocumented parameter choices, tacit conventions, expired dependencies, shifting data versions, and unrecorded assumptions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Reproducibility & Replicability", "one_liner": "Repeatable results.", "page_ref": "prime:reproducibility_replicability", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Output -> original result; data tools assumptions -> study artifact and method.", "slug": "reproducibility_replicability", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires a result plus the data, code, methods, and conditions on which it depends."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The output depends on specific data, tools, parameters, assumptions, roles, environmental conditions, or handoffs.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Independent rerun or replication under matched conditions is a defining role.", "role_mapping": "Future person or team -> independent replicator; verify or rerun -> attempt.", "slug": "reproducibility_replicability", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b055_a13_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A team produces a result, but the details that made it possible are scattered across memory, local files, undocumented parameter choices, tacit conventions, expired dependencies, shifting data versions, and unrecorded assumptions. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Another person, team, regulator, maintainer, reviewer, or future version of the same team may need to verify or rerun the result.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Another person, team, regulator, maintainer, reviewer, or future version of the same team may need to verify or rerun the result.", "A team produces a result, but the details that made it possible are scattered across memory, local files, undocumented parameter choices, tacit conventions, expired dependencies, shifting data versions, and unrecorded assumptions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Reproducibility & Replicability", "one_liner": "Repeatable results.", "page_ref": "prime:reproducibility_replicability", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Future person or team -> independent replicator; verify or rerun -> attempt.", "slug": "reproducibility_replicability", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Independent rerun or replication under matched conditions is a defining role."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Another person, team, regulator, maintainer, reviewer, or future version of the same team may need to verify or rerun the result.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Challenge, replication, and transfer are explicit reasons to preserve an independently testable artifact and success criterion.", "role_mapping": "Challenged result -> original claim; replicate -> independent attempt.", "slug": "reproducibility_replicability", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b055_a13_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when results may be reviewed by others, challenged by stakeholders, reused by future teams, scaled to new contexts, or used as evidence for consequential decisions. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The result may be challenged, replicated, scaled, transferred, automated, or used as precedent.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The result may be challenged, replicated, scaled, transferred, automated, or used as precedent.", "It is especially useful when results may be reviewed by others, challenged by stakeholders, reused by future teams, scaled to new contexts, or used as evidence for consequential decisions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Reproducibility & Replicability", "one_liner": "Repeatable results.", "page_ref": "prime:reproducibility_replicability", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Challenged result -> original claim; replicate -> independent attempt.", "slug": "reproducibility_replicability", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Challenge, replication, and transfer are explicit reasons to preserve an independently testable artifact and success criterion."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The result may be challenged, replicated, scaled, transferred, automated, or used as precedent.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A claim, report, model, decision, experiment, production run, or operational procedure will influence consequential action.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when a finding, decision, analysis, production run, operational response, model output, or report will matter beyond the moment of production. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: A claim, report, model, decision, experiment, production run, or operational procedure will influence consequential action. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A claim, report, model, decision, experiment, production run, or operational procedure will influence consequential action.", "Use this archetype when a finding, decision, analysis, production run, operational response, model output, or report will matter beyond the moment of production."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "A claim, report, model, decision, experiment, production run, or operational procedure will influence consequential action."}, {"display_text": "Errors, drift, undocumented changes, or tacit know-how would be costly if discovered late.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The result becomes dependent on memory, tacit context, fragile tooling, undocumented choices, or inaccessible inputs. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Errors, drift, undocumented changes, or tacit know-how would be costly if discovered late. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Errors, drift, undocumented changes, or tacit know-how would be costly if discovered late.", "The result becomes dependent on memory, tacit context, fragile tooling, undocumented choices, or inaccessible inputs."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Errors, drift, undocumented changes, or tacit know-how would be costly if discovered late."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 55, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-055", "ledger_sha256": "d9b9148377269b108a40dc43d18ae544e0d5bdb165aa2c9d8bde8bc3e3b25408"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Reputational Signal Governance", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:reputational_signal_governance", "slug": "reputational_signal_governance"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Actors need to decide how much to trust, include, verify, reward, delegate to, transact with, or sanction other actors, but the relevant evidence is distributed across past interactions, private experiences, incomplete records, and contested accounts.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Actors need to decide how much to trust, include, verify, reward, delegate to, transact with, or sanction other actors, but the relevant evidence is distributed across past interactions, private experiences, incomplete records, and contested accounts."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime requires third-party transmission of past conduct so strangers can consult an actor's standing in later encounters.", "role_mapping": "Repeated actor -> agent; future others -> third-party audience.", "slug": "reputation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b055_a14_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The same actor, group, role, artifact, organization, or node will be encountered again by others who were not present for prior behavior. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The same actor, group, role, artifact, organization, or node will be encountered again by others who were not present for prior behavior."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Reputation", "one_liner": "An aggregated signal of past behaviour that shapes how others treat an agent.", "page_ref": "prime:reputation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Repeated actor -> agent; future others -> third-party audience.", "slug": "reputation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime requires third-party transmission of past conduct so strangers can consult an actor's standing in later encounters."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The same actor, group, role, artifact, organization, or node will be encountered again by others who were not present for prior behavior.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Hidden reliability and cooperation history are compressed into standing that shapes future treatment.", "role_mapping": "Behavior history -> observed conduct stock; future decision -> altered treatment.", "slug": "reputation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b055_a14_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Reputation must simplify a complex history enough to guide action, but every simplification creates power: it can help cooperation and screening while also producing false certainty, stigma, surveillance, discrimination, and strategic manipulation. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Hidden reliability, quality, cooperation, safety, honesty, or contribution history materially affects future decisions.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Hidden reliability, quality, cooperation, safety, honesty, or contribution history materially affects future decisions.", "Reputation must simplify a complex history enough to guide action, but every simplification creates power: it can help cooperation and screening while also producing false certainty, stigma, surveillance, discrimination, and strategic manipulation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Reputation", "one_liner": "An aggregated signal of past behaviour that shapes how others treat an agent.", "page_ref": "prime:reputation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Behavior history -> observed conduct stock; future decision -> altered treatment.", "slug": "reputation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Hidden reliability and cooperation history are compressed into standing that shapes future treatment."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Hidden reliability, quality, cooperation, safety, honesty, or contribution history materially affects future decisions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Reputation itself may be informal gossip or raw ratings; unreliability is a governance problem, not a mandatory feature.", "slug": "reputation"}], "residual_id": "r:reputational_signal_governance:b055_a14_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b055_a14_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Past behavior must influence future treatment, but informal gossip, raw ratings, or ad hoc memory would be unreliable or unfair. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Past behavior must influence future treatment, but informal gossip, raw ratings, or ad hoc memory would be unreliable or unfair."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Reputation itself may be informal gossip or raw ratings; unreliability is a governance problem, not a mandatory feature.", "slug": "reputation"}], "normalized_requirement": "Past behavior must influence future treatment, but informal gossip, raw ratings, or ad hoc memory would be unreliable or unfair.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Past behavior must influence future treatment, but informal gossip, raw ratings, or ad hoc memory would be unreliable or unfair.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Direct verification is too costly, slow, or incomplete for every interaction.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Actors need to decide how much to trust, include, verify, reward, delegate to, transact with, or sanction other actors, but the relevant evidence is distributed across past interactions, private experiences, incomplete records, and contested accounts. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Direct verification is too costly, slow, or incomplete for every interaction. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Direct verification is too costly, slow, or incomplete for every interaction.", "Actors need to decide how much to trust, include, verify, reward, delegate to, transact with, or sanction other actors, but the relevant evidence is distributed across past interactions, private experiences, incomplete records, and contested accounts."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Direct verification is too costly, slow, or incomplete for every interaction."}, {"display_text": "The reputation signal itself creates incentives for gaming, retaliation, selective disclosure, or reputation laundering.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Reputation must simplify a complex history enough to guide action, but every simplification creates power: it can help cooperation and screening while also producing false certainty, stigma, surveillance, discrimination, and strategic manipulation. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: The reputation signal itself creates incentives for gaming, retaliation, selective disclosure, or reputation laundering. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The reputation signal itself creates incentives for gaming, retaliation, selective disclosure, or reputation laundering.", "Reputation must simplify a complex history enough to guide action, but every simplification creates power: it can help cooperation and screening while also producing false certainty, stigma, surveillance, discrimination, and strategic manipulation."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The reputation signal itself creates incentives for gaming, retaliation, selective disclosure, or reputation laundering."}, {"display_text": "The consequences of standing are important enough to require correction, appeal, decay, rehabilitation, or privacy boundaries.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this deployment constraint: The consequences of standing are important enough to require correction, appeal, decay, rehabilitation, or privacy boundaries. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The consequences of standing are important enough to require correction, appeal, decay, rehabilitation, or privacy boundaries."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The consequences of standing are important enough to require correction, appeal, decay, rehabilitation, or privacy boundaries."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 55, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-055", "ledger_sha256": "d9b9148377269b108a40dc43d18ae544e0d5bdb165aa2c9d8bde8bc3e3b25408"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Request–Response Capability Provisioning", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:request_response_capability_provisioning", "slug": "request_response_capability_provisioning"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 5, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 8 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 8}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Many independent actors need repeated access to the same scarce, authoritative, stateful, expensive, or specialized capability, but each actor currently duplicates it, negotiates ad hoc access, depends on undocumented individuals, or couples directly to internal implementation. Attempts to centralize the capability without a request–response contract then create an opaque shared choke point whose capacity, failures, and access rules are discovered only during overload.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Many independent actors need repeated access to the same scarce, authoritative, stateful, expensive, or specialized capability, but each actor currently duplicates it, negotiates ad hoc access, depends on undocumented individuals, or couples directly to internal implementation. Attempts to centralize the capability without a request–response contract then create an opaque shared choke point whose capacity, failures, and access rules are discovered only during overload."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact topology requires many independent clients repeatedly consuming one capability-holding server.", "role_mapping": "Multiple actors -> clients; common capability -> server holding.", "slug": "client_server_model", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b055_a15_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Concentrating capability behind one address can create reuse, consistency, specialization, and simpler clients, but it also concentrates dependency, power, demand, failure, and information. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Multiple clients repeatedly need the same capability, resource, data, authority, expertise, or computation.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Multiple clients repeatedly need the same capability, resource, data, authority, expertise, or computation.", "Concentrating capability behind one address can create reuse, consistency, specialization, and simpler clients, but it also concentrates dependency, power, demand, failure, and information."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Client Server Model", "one_liner": "An asymmetric request-response relation in which one party holds a capability and many others initiate to consume it.", "page_ref": "prime:client_server_model", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Multiple actors -> clients; common capability -> server holding.", "slug": "client_server_model", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact topology requires many independent clients repeatedly consuming one capability-holding server."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Multiple clients repeatedly need the same capability, resource, data, authority, expertise, or computation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Capability asymmetry—the server holds a resource, authority, computation, or expertise clients lack—is mandatory.", "role_mapping": "Scarce expertise -> held capability; coherent owner -> server.", "slug": "client_server_model", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b055_a15_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Many independent actors need repeated access to the same scarce, authoritative, stateful, expensive, or specialized capability, but each actor currently duplicates it, negotiates ad hoc access, depends on undocumented individuals, or couples directly to internal implementation. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The capability is expensive, scarce, safety-sensitive, authoritative, difficult to maintain, or benefits from coherent ownership.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The capability is expensive, scarce, safety-sensitive, authoritative, difficult to maintain, or benefits from coherent ownership.", "Many independent actors need repeated access to the same scarce, authoritative, stateful, expensive, or specialized capability, but each actor currently duplicates it, negotiates ad hoc access, depends on undocumented individuals, or couples directly to internal implementation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Client Server Model", "one_liner": "An asymmetric request-response relation in which one party holds a capability and many others initiate to consume it.", "page_ref": "prime:client_server_model", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Scarce expertise -> held capability; coherent owner -> server.", "slug": "client_server_model", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Capability asymmetry—the server holds a resource, authority, computation, or expertise clients lack—is mandatory."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The capability is expensive, scarce, safety-sensitive, authoritative, difficult to maintain, or benefits from coherent ownership.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Clients initiate through the request-response surface, need not know one another, and depend on the protocol rather than server internals.", "role_mapping": "Clients -> initiating consumers; internal implementation -> server interior.", "slug": "client_server_model", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b055_a15_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Many independent actors need repeated access to the same scarce, authoritative, stateful, expensive, or specialized capability, but each actor currently duplicates it, negotiates ad hoc access, depends on undocumented individuals, or couples directly to internal implementation. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Clients should be able to use the capability without knowing its internal implementation or coordinating with one another.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Clients should be able to use the capability without knowing its internal implementation or coordinating with one another.", "Many independent actors need repeated access to the same scarce, authoritative, stateful, expensive, or specialized capability, but each actor currently duplicates it, negotiates ad hoc access, depends on undocumented individuals, or couples directly to internal implementation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Client Server Model", "one_liner": "An asymmetric request-response relation in which one party holds a capability and many others initiate to consume it.", "page_ref": "prime:client_server_model", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Clients -> initiating consumers; internal implementation -> server interior.", "slug": "client_server_model", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Clients initiate through the request-response surface, need not know one another, and depend on the protocol rather than server internals."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Clients should be able to use the capability without knowing its internal implementation or coordinating with one another.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Addressability is required, but no prior bespoke person-to-person negotiation or replacement event is entailed.", "slug": "client_server_model"}], "residual_id": "r:request_response_capability_provisioning:b055_a15_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b055_a15_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A stable address or named provider can replace bespoke person-to-person discovery and negotiation. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A stable address or named provider can replace bespoke person-to-person discovery and negotiation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Addressability is required, but no prior bespoke person-to-person negotiation or replacement event is entailed.", "slug": "client_server_model"}], "normalized_requirement": "A stable address or named provider can replace bespoke person-to-person discovery and negotiation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A stable address or named provider can replace bespoke person-to-person discovery and negotiation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Multiplexing is mandatory, but requests may be smooth and provisioned well below capacity.", "slug": "client_server_model"}], "residual_id": "r:request_response_capability_provisioning:b055_a15_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b055_a15_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Demand arrives independently or in bursts and must share finite service capacity. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Demand arrives independently or in bursts and must share finite service capacity."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Multiplexing is mandatory, but requests may be smooth and provisioned well below capacity.", "slug": "client_server_model"}], "normalized_requirement": "Demand arrives independently or in bursts and must share finite service capacity.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Demand arrives independently or in bursts and must share finite service capacity.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A client-server protocol can be changed incompatibly and does not guarantee independent provider evolution.", "slug": "client_server_model"}], "residual_id": "r:request_response_capability_provisioning:b055_a15_c7", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b055_a15_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The provider may need to evolve, replicate, relocate, or change implementation without forcing every client to change simultaneously. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The provider may need to evolve, replicate, relocate, or change implementation without forcing every client to change simultaneously."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A client-server protocol can be changed incompatibly and does not guarantee independent provider evolution.", "slug": "client_server_model"}], "normalized_requirement": "The provider may need to evolve, replicate, relocate, or change implementation without forcing every client to change simultaneously.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The provider may need to evolve, replicate, relocate, or change implementation without forcing every client to change simultaneously.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A structured request and response protocol is the single coordination surface of the topology.", "role_mapping": "Request structure -> client initiation; execute and close -> server response.", "slug": "client_server_model", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b055_a15_c8", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A request can be represented with enough structure to admit, schedule, execute, and close it. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A request can be represented with enough structure to admit, schedule, execute, and close it."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Client Server Model", "one_liner": "An asymmetric request-response relation in which one party holds a capability and many others initiate to consume it.", "page_ref": "prime:client_server_model", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Request structure -> client initiation; execute and close -> server response.", "slug": "client_server_model", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A structured request and response protocol is the single coordination surface of the topology."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A request can be represented with enough structure to admit, schedule, execute, and close it.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [8], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact record requires a real capability asymmetry, distinguishing the topology from arbitrary centralization.", "role_mapping": "Legitimate asymmetry -> server holds what clients lack.", "slug": "client_server_model", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b055_a15_c10", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Attempts to centralize the capability without a request–response contract then create an opaque shared choke point whose capacity, failures, and access rules are discovered only during overload. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: There is a legitimate reason for capability asymmetry rather than a desire to centralize control for its own sake.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [10], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["There is a legitimate reason for capability asymmetry rather than a desire to centralize control for its own sake.", "Attempts to centralize the capability without a request–response contract then create an opaque shared choke point whose capacity, failures, and access rules are discovered only during overload."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Client Server Model", "one_liner": "An asymmetric request-response relation in which one party holds a capability and many others initiate to consume it.", "page_ref": "prime:client_server_model", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Legitimate asymmetry -> server holds what clients lack.", "slug": "client_server_model", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact record requires a real capability asymmetry, distinguishing the topology from arbitrary centralization."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "There is a legitimate reason for capability asymmetry rather than a desire to centralize control for its own sake.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [10], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Consistency, auditability, security, or quality improve when one bounded provider owns the result contract.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Consistency, auditability, security, or quality improve when one bounded provider owns the result contract. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Consistency, auditability, security, or quality improve when one bounded provider owns the result contract."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Consistency, auditability, security, or quality improve when one bounded provider owns the result contract."}, {"display_text": "Failure, refusal, timeout, and partial completion need explicit semantics because clients otherwise retry or escalate unpredictably.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Concentrating capability behind one address can create reuse, consistency, specialization, and simpler clients, but it also concentrates dependency, power, demand, failure, and information. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: Failure, refusal, timeout, and partial completion need explicit semantics because clients otherwise retry or escalate unpredictably. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [9], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Failure, refusal, timeout, and partial completion need explicit semantics because clients otherwise retry or escalate unpredictably.", "Concentrating capability behind one address can create reuse, consistency, specialization, and simpler clients, but it also concentrates dependency, power, demand, failure, and information."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 9, "text": "Failure, refusal, timeout, and partial completion need explicit semantics because clients otherwise retry or escalate unpredictably."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 55, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-055", "ledger_sha256": "d9b9148377269b108a40dc43d18ae544e0d5bdb165aa2c9d8bde8bc3e3b25408"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Requisite Variety Matching", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:requisite_variety_matching", "slug": "requisite_variety_matching"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 5, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 6 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a mismatch between environmental variety and internal response variety. The environment presents varied cases, disturbances, risks, needs, or states; the system has too few distinctions, too few response modes, poor routing, weak escalation, or stale procedures. The result is brittle control. Ordinary cases may be handled well, but unusual or complex cases trigger delay, manual workarounds, unsafe simplification, unnecessary escalation, or collapse.\n\nA second structural problem is the opposite failure: uncontrolled response variety. Systems sometimes create many special procedures without governance, ownership, training, or retirement. That kind of variety is not requisite; it is noise. The archetype preserves only variety that improves fit, control, safety, learning, or resilience.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "The environment presents more states, demands, exceptions, or disturbances than the system can recognize or respond to."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A regulator can satisfy requisite variety while still using one response for a subset of cases that differ in irrelevant ways.", "slug": "requisite_variety"}], "residual_id": "r:requisite_variety_matching:b056_a01_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b056_a01_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Requisite Variety Matching is about the *kinds of responses available and how cases reach them. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A single standard response is repeatedly applied to cases that differ in consequential ways.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A single standard response is repeatedly applied to cases that differ in consequential ways.", "Requisite Variety Matching is about the *kinds of responses available and how cases reach them."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A regulator can satisfy requisite variety while still using one response for a subset of cases that differ in irrelevant ways.", "slug": "requisite_variety"}], "normalized_requirement": "A single standard response is repeatedly applied to cases that differ in consequential ways.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A single standard response is repeatedly applied to cases that differ in consequential ways.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The law specifies a variety lower bound but does not entail that the current regulator violates it.", "slug": "requisite_variety"}], "residual_id": "r:requisite_variety_matching:b056_a01_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b056_a01_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when a system repeatedly encounters exceptions, case diversity, local variation, adversarial adaptation, learner differences, hazard classes, or demand states that exceed its current response repertoire. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Exceptions, edge cases, local conditions, or adversarial moves exceed what current procedures can handle.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Exceptions, edge cases, local conditions, or adversarial moves exceed what current procedures can handle.", "Use this archetype when a system repeatedly encounters exceptions, case diversity, local variation, adversarial adaptation, learner differences, hazard classes, or demand states that exceed its current response repertoire."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The law specifies a variety lower bound but does not entail that the current regulator violates it.", "slug": "requisite_variety"}], "normalized_requirement": "Exceptions, edge cases, local conditions, or adversarial moves exceed what current procedures can handle.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Exceptions, edge cases, local conditions, or adversarial moves exceed what current procedures can handle.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P093-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a central control role and incoming case decisions.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A centralized controller receives or decides cases that require responses or judgments.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve both excessive case load and heterogeneity, not a small uniform queue.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The controller receives too many cases of materially different kinds.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve context-sensitive decision work.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The cases require contextual judgment rather than one mechanical uniform rule.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must make the case burden causal for overload, not merely coincident with an independently failing controller.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The volume and variety of context-dependent cases overload central control.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Central control becomes overloaded because too many heterogeneous cases require contextual judgment.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "context-dependent case variety overloads central control", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P093-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A variety mismatch may occur in a decentralized regulator without central overload.", "slug": "requisite_variety"}], "residual_id": "r:requisite_variety_matching:b056_a01_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b056_a01_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when teams are improvising around recurring cases, when all variation is forced through one overloaded generalist path, or when a standard response is simultaneously too much for simple cases and too little for complex ones. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Central control becomes overloaded because too many different cases require contextual judgment.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Central control becomes overloaded because too many different cases require contextual judgment.", "It is especially useful when teams are improvising around recurring cases, when all variation is forced through one overloaded generalist path, or when a standard response is simultaneously too much for simple cases and too little for complex ones."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A variety mismatch may occur in a decentralized regulator without central overload.", "slug": "requisite_variety"}], "normalized_requirement": "Central control becomes overloaded because too many different cases require contextual judgment.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Central control becomes overloaded because too many different cases require contextual judgment.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A regulator can match the disturbance set and therefore have prepared responses for every class.", "slug": "requisite_variety"}], "residual_id": "r:requisite_variety_matching:b056_a01_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b056_a01_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when teams are improvising around recurring cases, when all variation is forced through one overloaded generalist path, or when a standard response is simultaneously too much for simple cases and too little for complex ones. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Response teams improvise frequently because recurring disturbance classes have no prepared response.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Response teams improvise frequently because recurring disturbance classes have no prepared response.", "It is especially useful when teams are improvising around recurring cases, when all variation is forced through one overloaded generalist path, or when a standard response is simultaneously too much for simple cases and too little for complex ones."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A regulator can match the disturbance set and therefore have prepared responses for every class.", "slug": "requisite_variety"}], "normalized_requirement": "Response teams improvise frequently because recurring disturbance classes have no prepared response.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Response teams improvise frequently because recurring disturbance classes have no prepared response.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P093-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve cases, a response system, and a demand dimension relevant to response selection.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A response system encounters cases that vary along a response-relevant demand dimension.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail graded heterogeneity rather than one undifferentiated case class.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The cases occupy different levels of that demand dimension.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve necessity of differentiated intensity, not merely an optional tiering preference.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The differing case levels require differing response intensities.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must connect demand level to response intensity rather than vary response for unrelated reasons.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Response intensity is matched to the relevant case level.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Different levels of case severity, risk, urgency, or required expertise need different response intensities.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "graded case demands require differentiated response intensity", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P093-C08-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Relevant variety need not be severity- or expertise-graded.", "slug": "requisite_variety"}], "residual_id": "r:requisite_variety_matching:b056_a01_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b056_a01_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Different levels of severity, risk, urgency, or expertise need different response intensities. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Different levels of severity, risk, urgency, or expertise need different response intensities."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "The fallacy wrongly assigns zero attention to the lesser concern, but its exact boundary expressly preserves the legitimate rule that severity ranking changes how much total attention each case warrants.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Relative Privation", "one_liner": "The informal fallacy of dismissing a concern by pointing to a worse problem elsewhere, conflating severity-ranking with action-licensing — since ranking governs how much total attention a problem warrants, not whether it is eligible for any, unless the worse problem's resources are genuinely exclusive.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:relative_privation", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "relative_privation"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "relative_privation", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P093-C08-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every complete instance distinguishes two severity levels and explicitly states that rank governs how much attention each deserves while not erasing the lesser case's eligibility for any response."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Different levels of severity, risk, urgency, or expertise need different response intensities.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Requisite variety distinguishes repertoire from capacity, but does not entail a failed capacity addition.", "slug": "requisite_variety"}], "residual_id": "r:requisite_variety_matching:b056_a01_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b056_a01_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The environment presents varied cases, disturbances, risks, needs, or states; the system has too few distinctions, too few response modes, poor routing, weak escalation, or stale procedures. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The organization adds capacity but still fails because capacity is not differentiated or routed to the right cases.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The organization adds capacity but still fails because capacity is not differentiated or routed to the right cases.", "The environment presents varied cases, disturbances, risks, needs, or states; the system has too few distinctions, too few response modes, poor routing, weak escalation, or stale procedures."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Requisite variety distinguishes repertoire from capacity, but does not entail a failed capacity addition.", "slug": "requisite_variety"}], "normalized_requirement": "The organization adds capacity but still fails because capacity is not differentiated or routed to the right cases.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The organization adds capacity but still fails because capacity is not differentiated or routed to the right cases.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Environmental variety is increasing through scale, diversity, volatility, customization, adversarial behavior, or policy complexity.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The structural problem is a mismatch between environmental variety and internal response variety. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Environmental variety is increasing through scale, diversity, volatility, customization, adversarial behavior, or policy complexity. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Environmental variety is increasing through scale, diversity, volatility, customization, adversarial behavior, or policy complexity.", "The structural problem is a mismatch between environmental variety and internal response variety."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "Environmental variety is increasing through scale, diversity, volatility, customization, adversarial behavior, or policy complexity."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 56, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-056", "ledger_sha256": "eb208244c07bfc5ab3669684da9dfd03bf8283b6a0fb363b50e3aa21f90ce0ae"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Resensitization Reset", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:resensitization_reset", "slug": "resensitization_reset"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is repeated exposure that changes the receiver. After enough repetition, the same input no longer has the same effect. The intervention may still be valid in principle, but the exposure history has altered responsiveness.\n\nThis creates a dangerous escalation loop. The weaker response makes actors increase volume, intensity, novelty, strictness, or reward. That escalation can make the system even more tolerant, fatigued, dependent, annoyed, or saturated. A reset breaks the loop by changing the exposure pattern before escalation becomes the only imagined solution.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A stimulus or intervention that once worked has lost effect because the system has adapted to repeated exposure. Continuing the same pattern, or increasing intensity without a reset, risks escalation, fatigue, dependence, ignored signals, or further tolerance."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime requires a time-indexed sequence of repeated identical or equivalent exposures.", "role_mapping": "Exposure history -> repeated dose sequence.", "slug": "tolerance", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b056_a02_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when a once-effective signal, reward, message, workload, stimulus, or intervention now produces a weaker response because it has been repeated too often or too predictably. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: There is a repeated exposure history to a signal, reward, workload, stimulus, message, or intervention.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["There is a repeated exposure history to a signal, reward, workload, stimulus, message, or intervention.", "Use this archetype when a once-effective signal, reward, message, workload, stimulus, or intervention now produces a weaker response because it has been repeated too often or too predictably."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Tolerance", "one_liner": "Reduced effect with repetition.", "page_ref": "prime:tolerance", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Exposure history -> repeated dose sequence.", "slug": "tolerance", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime requires a time-indexed sequence of repeated identical or equivalent exposures."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "There is a repeated exposure history to a signal, reward, workload, stimulus, message, or intervention.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Holding input constant while response magnitude declines is the canonical signature of tolerance.", "role_mapping": "Similar input -> held dose; declined response -> rightward dose-response shift.", "slug": "tolerance", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b056_a02_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The weaker response makes actors increase volume, intensity, novelty, strictness, or reward. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Response has declined despite similar or higher input intensity.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Response has declined despite similar or higher input intensity.", "The weaker response makes actors increase volume, intensity, novelty, strictness, or reward."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Tolerance", "one_liner": "Reduced effect with repetition.", "page_ref": "prime:tolerance", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Similar input -> held dose; declined response -> rightward dose-response shift.", "slug": "tolerance", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Holding input constant while response magnitude declines is the canonical signature of tolerance."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Response has declined despite similar or higher input intensity.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The condition explicitly includes tolerance or habituation as the mechanism rather than permanent mismatch.", "role_mapping": "Desensitization -> internal adaptation; reversible decline -> tolerance.", "slug": "tolerance", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b056_a02_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Continuing the same pattern, or increasing intensity without a reset, risks escalation, fatigue, dependence, ignored signals, or further tolerance. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The decline is plausibly caused by tolerance, habituation, desensitization, fatigue, or stale salience rather than permanent unsuitability alone.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The decline is plausibly caused by tolerance, habituation, desensitization, fatigue, or stale salience rather than permanent unsuitability alone.", "Continuing the same pattern, or increasing intensity without a reset, risks escalation, fatigue, dependence, ignored signals, or further tolerance."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Tolerance", "one_liner": "Reduced effect with repetition.", "page_ref": "prime:tolerance", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Desensitization -> internal adaptation; reversible decline -> tolerance.", "slug": "tolerance", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The condition explicitly includes tolerance or habituation as the mechanism rather than permanent mismatch."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The decline is plausibly caused by tolerance, habituation, desensitization, fatigue, or stale salience rather than permanent unsuitability alone.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Escalating the same input would increase cost, harm, fatigue, resistance, saturation, or loss of trust.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Escalating the same input would increase cost, harm, fatigue, resistance, saturation, or loss of trust. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Escalating the same input would increase cost, harm, fatigue, resistance, saturation, or loss of trust."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Escalating the same input would increase cost, harm, fatigue, resistance, saturation, or loss of trust."}, {"display_text": "Exposure can be reduced, paused, varied, or routed through substitutes without violating essential safety or service obligations.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Do not use it when the input never worked, when the problem is ordinary capacity depletion without a tolerance signal, or when an essential safeguard would have to be removed without a substitute. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: Exposure can be reduced, paused, varied, or routed through substitutes without violating essential safety or service obligations. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Exposure can be reduced, paused, varied, or routed through substitutes without violating essential safety or service obligations.", "Do not use it when the input never worked, when the problem is ordinary capacity depletion without a tolerance signal, or when an essential safeguard would have to be removed without a substitute."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Exposure can be reduced, paused, varied, or routed through substitutes without violating essential safety or service obligations."}, {"display_text": "Responsiveness can be retested before the original exposure pattern returns.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The intervention may still be valid in principle, but the exposure history has altered responsiveness. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: Responsiveness can be retested before the original exposure pattern returns. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Responsiveness can be retested before the original exposure pattern returns.", "The intervention may still be valid in principle, but the exposure history has altered responsiveness."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Responsiveness can be retested before the original exposure pattern returns."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 56, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-056", "ledger_sha256": "eb208244c07bfc5ab3669684da9dfd03bf8283b6a0fb363b50e3aa21f90ce0ae"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Residual-Driven Model Refinement", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:residual_driven_model_refinement", "slug": "residual_driven_model_refinement"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 3 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The best available model, forecast, theory, calibration, or policy expectation explains enough to be used, yet its unexplained remainder is either discarded as noise, compressed into one average score, or mined opportunistically. As a result, systematic misspecification, omitted structure, regime dependence, measurement defects, and concentrated subgroup failures persist without a controlled learning path.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "The best available model, forecast, theory, calibration, or policy expectation explains enough to be used, yet its unexplained remainder is either discarded as noise, compressed into one average score, or mined opportunistically. As a result, systematic misspecification, omitted structure, regime dependence, measurement defects, and concentrated subgroup failures persist without a controlled learning path."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime requires observed data aligned with predictions from a best-available explanatory model so subtraction is defined.", "role_mapping": "Expectations -> model predictions; observations -> observed data.", "slug": "residual_analysis", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b056_a03_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A reference explanation can generate case-level, time-level, or condition-level expectations that can be aligned with observations. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A reference explanation can generate case-level, time-level, or condition-level expectations that can be aligned with observations."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Residual Analysis", "one_liner": "Subtract the best explanation and study the leftover as the next site of structure, not as noise.", "page_ref": "prime:residual_analysis", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Expectations -> model predictions; observations -> observed data.", "slug": "residual_analysis", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime requires observed data aligned with predictions from a best-available explanatory model so subtraction is defined."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A reference explanation can generate case-level, time-level, or condition-level expectations that can be aligned with observations.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The analysis may find residuals conform to the precommitted noise model and correctly stop.", "slug": "residual_analysis"}], "residual_id": "r:residual_driven_model_refinement:b056_a03_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b056_a03_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The same signed or shaped errors recur beyond what the stated uncertainty model would normally produce. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The same signed or shaped errors recur beyond what the stated uncertainty model would normally produce."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The analysis may find residuals conform to the precommitted noise model and correctly stop.", "slug": "residual_analysis"}], "normalized_requirement": "The same signed or shaped errors recur beyond what the stated uncertainty model would normally produce.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The same signed or shaped errors recur beyond what the stated uncertainty model would normally produce.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Patterned residuals can arise within the model's nominal regime from omitted variables or wrong functional form.", "slug": "residual_analysis"}], "residual_id": "r:residual_driven_model_refinement:b056_a03_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b056_a03_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The process must remain sensitive enough to learn from leftover structure while remaining conservative enough not to overfit stochastic variation, measurement artifacts, or post-hoc stories. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Extrapolation, distribution shift, measurement change, or process drift may have moved observations outside the reference explanation's validated regime.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Extrapolation, distribution shift, measurement change, or process drift may have moved observations outside the reference explanation's validated regime.", "The process must remain sensitive enough to learn from leftover structure while remaining conservative enough not to overfit stochastic variation, measurement artifacts, or post-hoc stories."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Patterned residuals can arise within the model's nominal regime from omitted variables or wrong functional form.", "slug": "residual_analysis"}], "normalized_requirement": "Extrapolation, distribution shift, measurement change, or process drift may have moved observations outside the reference explanation's validated regime.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Extrapolation, distribution shift, measurement change, or process drift may have moved observations outside the reference explanation's validated regime.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Global fit or average performance appears acceptable, but decision makers suspect local, sequential, subgroup, tail, or regime-specific failure.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "As a result, systematic misspecification, omitted structure, regime dependence, measurement defects, and concentrated subgroup failures persist without a controlled learning path. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Global fit or average performance appears acceptable, but decision makers suspect local, sequential, subgroup, tail, or regime-specific failure. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Global fit or average performance appears acceptable, but decision makers suspect local, sequential, subgroup, tail, or regime-specific failure.", "As a result, systematic misspecification, omitted structure, regime dependence, measurement defects, and concentrated subgroup failures persist without a controlled learning path."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "Global fit or average performance appears acceptable, but decision makers suspect local, sequential, subgroup, tail, or regime-specific failure."}, {"display_text": "A model or theory is being revised repeatedly without a transparent link between diagnostic evidence and each added term, rule, or exception.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The best available model, forecast, theory, calibration, or policy expectation explains enough to be used, yet its unexplained remainder is either discarded as noise, compressed into one average score, or mined opportunistically. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: A model or theory is being revised repeatedly without a transparent link between diagnostic evidence and each added term, rule, or exception. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A model or theory is being revised repeatedly without a transparent link between diagnostic evidence and each added term, rule, or exception.", "The best available model, forecast, theory, calibration, or policy expectation explains enough to be used, yet its unexplained remainder is either discarded as noise, compressed into one average score, or mined opportunistically."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "A model or theory is being revised repeatedly without a transparent link between diagnostic evidence and each added term, rule, or exception."}, {"display_text": "A high-stakes use requires evidence that residual risk is not concentrated in a vulnerable or rare slice.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this deployment constraint: A high-stakes use requires evidence that residual risk is not concentrated in a vulnerable or rare slice. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A high-stakes use requires evidence that residual risk is not concentrated in a vulnerable or rare slice."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "A high-stakes use requires evidence that residual risk is not concentrated in a vulnerable or rare slice."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 56, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-056", "ledger_sha256": "eb208244c07bfc5ab3669684da9dfd03bf8283b6a0fb363b50e3aa21f90ce0ae"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Residual Harm Accounting and Allocation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:residual_harm_accounting_and_allocation", "slug": "residual_harm_accounting_and_allocation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Layered defenses can create a misleading sense of completion. A levee holds for some neighborhoods but not others; a security program contains the breach but customers still suffer; a patient-safety system catches many errors but one patient is harmed; a platform removes most abuse while particular users carry severe residual damage. When success metrics center on the defense layer, the loss that survives it can become nobody’s formal problem.\n\nThe structural problem is not just that harm happened. It is that the harm sits after the main governance story: after prevention, after mitigation, after containment, after adaptation, after incident response. That position makes it easy to call the harm unfortunate, external, unavoidable, or already handled. The archetype creates a second governance object for the remainder.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A hazard, intervention, failure, or environmental change passes through one or more layers of defense, mitigation, adaptation, containment, or repair. The remaining harm is real, but it is easy for the system to treat it as unavoidable background noise, an unowned externality, an accounting afterthought, or a problem for the least powerful affected parties. Without an explicit residual-harm object, the system cannot decide who bears the damage, who pays, what is repaired, what is accepted, and what should change upstream."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime requires layered defenses that reduce but do not eliminate a threat, leaving irreducible residual harm.", "role_mapping": "Mitigation layers -> finite defenses; remaining harm -> residual leakage.", "slug": "loss_and_damage", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b056_a04_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is that the harm sits after the main governance story: after prevention, after mitigation, after containment, after adaptation, after incident response. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Prevention, mitigation, adaptation, containment, or compensation has reduced but not eliminated harm.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Prevention, mitigation, adaptation, containment, or compensation has reduced but not eliminated harm.", "It is that the harm sits after the main governance story: after prevention, after mitigation, after containment, after adaptation, after incident response."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Loss And Damage", "one_liner": "The residual harm that passes through after every layer of defense, treated as its own accounting unit and assigned a bearer and a policy.", "page_ref": "prime:loss_and_damage", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Mitigation layers -> finite defenses; remaining harm -> residual leakage.", "slug": "loss_and_damage", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime requires layered defenses that reduce but do not eliminate a threat, leaving irreducible residual harm."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Prevention, mitigation, adaptation, containment, or compensation has reduced but not eliminated harm.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact record assigns a bearer, but ownership can already be clear despite multiple layers.", "slug": "loss_and_damage"}], "residual_id": "r:residual_harm_accounting_and_allocation:b056_a04_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b056_a04_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "When success metrics center on the defense layer, the loss that survives it can become nobody’s formal problem. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Multiple layers of defense make it hard to see where remaining loss belongs.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Multiple layers of defense make it hard to see where remaining loss belongs.", "When success metrics center on the defense layer, the loss that survives it can become nobody’s formal problem."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact record assigns a bearer, but ownership can already be clear despite multiple layers.", "slug": "loss_and_damage"}], "normalized_requirement": "Multiple layers of defense make it hard to see where remaining loss belongs.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Multiple layers of defense make it hard to see where remaining loss belongs.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P093-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve multiple harm channels rather than one homogeneous harm stream.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A system has at least two distinct channels through which harm occurs or remains.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail cross-channel heterogeneity rather than identical channels with different labels.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The harm channels differ along a characteristic relevant to consequence, accounting, allocation, or remedy.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve material harm-management relevance rather than an incidental descriptive difference.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The differing characteristic bears on how the harm can be measured, borne, timed, reversed, or remedied.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Multiple harm channels differ along one or more consequence or remedy dimensions.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "harm channels differ in consequence or remedy characteristics", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P093-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Residual harm may have one homogeneous channel and remedy type.", "slug": "loss_and_damage"}], "residual_id": "r:residual_harm_accounting_and_allocation:b056_a04_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b056_a04_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The remaining harm is real, but it is easy for the system to treat it as unavoidable background noise, an unowned externality, an accounting afterthought, or a problem for the least powerful affected parties. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Harm channels differ in reversibility, measurability, affected bearers, time horizon, or remedy type.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Harm channels differ in reversibility, measurability, affected bearers, time horizon, or remedy type.", "The remaining harm is real, but it is easy for the system to treat it as unavoidable background noise, an unowned externality, an accounting afterthought, or a problem for the least powerful affected parties."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A population with identical recovery trajectories would falsify the source, but it would not instantiate recovery inequity, whose exact identity requires at least two position-linked trajectories differing in speed and terminal quality.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Recovery Inequity", "one_liner": "The disaster-management pathology in which the post-event restoration phase proceeds at systematically different speeds and end-state qualities across the affected population — because rebuilding is a distributive contest mediated by insurance, land tenure, political voice, and social capital, not a neutral reversion to baseline.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:recovery_inequity", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "recovery_inequity"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "recovery_inequity", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P093-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record directly entails plural residual-harm trajectories that differ in bearer, restoration timing, access mechanism, and terminal outcome, all material to remedy."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A plain externality with no return channel is outside the exact candidate; blowback necessarily adds a delayed reaction channel materially different from the immediate peripheral-harm channel.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Collateral-Damage Blowback", "one_liner": "Diagnose why a tactically successful action ends net negative — its peripheral harm feeds a reaction channel that routes cost back to the actor's own future capacity, delayed and amplified — distinguishing a return channel from an ordinary externality.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:collateral_damage_blowback", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "collateral_damage_blowback"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "collateral_damage_blowback", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P093-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "The candidate directly entails immediate peripheral harm and a distinct delayed return channel, with different bearers, domains, time horizons, accounting, and remedies."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Harm channels differ in reversibility, measurability, affected bearers, time horizon, or remedy type.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime makes post-defense damage a third quantity distinct from prospective risk and the defenses, with a policy for handling it.", "role_mapping": "Preventable future harm -> threat/risk; residual now -> distinct damage line.", "slug": "loss_and_damage", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b056_a04_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The system must avoid two opposite errors: treating preventable harm as an accepted residual, and treating irreducible residual harm as if it will vanish through another round of prevention rhetoric. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Decision makers need to distinguish preventable future harm from residual harm that must be governed now.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Decision makers need to distinguish preventable future harm from residual harm that must be governed now.", "The system must avoid two opposite errors: treating preventable harm as an accepted residual, and treating irreducible residual harm as if it will vanish through another round of prevention rhetoric."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Loss And Damage", "one_liner": "The residual harm that passes through after every layer of defense, treated as its own accounting unit and assigned a bearer and a policy.", "page_ref": "prime:loss_and_damage", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Preventable future harm -> threat/risk; residual now -> distinct damage line.", "slug": "loss_and_damage", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime makes post-defense damage a third quantity distinct from prospective risk and the defenses, with a policy for handling it."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Decision makers need to distinguish preventable future harm from residual harm that must be governed now.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P093-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve all four role classes rather than collapse the problem to harm bearer and payer alone.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A harm-governance setting contains harmed-party, funding-source, responsible-actor, and policy-owner roles.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve institutional plurality rather than one entity holding every role.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "More than one entity occupies the four role classes.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail role nonidentity, without overstrengthening the source to require every pair of roles to be held by different entities.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The assignments of the four roles do not all coincide.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "The parties harmed, the funding sources, the actors responsible, and the policy owners do not all coincide in the same entities.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "harm bearer, funder, responsible actor, and policy owner roles are institutionally separated", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P093-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The same entity can be bearer, funder, responsible actor, and policy owner.", "slug": "loss_and_damage"}], "residual_id": "r:residual_harm_accounting_and_allocation:b056_a04_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b056_a04_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The remaining harm is real, but it is easy for the system to treat it as unavoidable background noise, an unowned externality, an accounting afterthought, or a problem for the least powerful affected parties. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The harmed parties, funding sources, responsible actors, and policy owners are not the same entities.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The harmed parties, funding sources, responsible actors, and policy owners are not the same entities.", "The remaining harm is real, but it is easy for the system to treat it as unavoidable background noise, an unowned externality, an accounting afterthought, or a problem for the least powerful affected parties."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The same entity can be bearer, funder, responsible actor, and policy owner.", "slug": "loss_and_damage"}], "normalized_requirement": "The harmed parties, funding sources, responsible actors, and policy owners are not the same entities.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The harmed parties, funding sources, responsible actors, and policy owners are not the same entities.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A mature risk register can already include realized residual harm.", "slug": "loss_and_damage"}], "residual_id": "r:residual_harm_accounting_and_allocation:b056_a04_c7", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b056_a04_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "When success metrics center on the defense layer, the loss that survives it can become nobody’s formal problem. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Existing risk registers track possible future loss but do not handle actual residual damage after defenses fail or saturate.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Existing risk registers track possible future loss but do not handle actual residual damage after defenses fail or saturate.", "When success metrics center on the defense layer, the loss that survives it can become nobody’s formal problem."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A mature risk register can already include realized residual harm.", "slug": "loss_and_damage"}], "normalized_requirement": "Existing risk registers track possible future loss but do not handle actual residual damage after defenses fail or saturate.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Existing risk registers track possible future loss but do not handle actual residual damage after defenses fail or saturate.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Non-monetary, delayed, or distributed harms risk being omitted because they are hard to price or prove.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Non-monetary, delayed, or distributed harms risk being omitted because they are hard to price or prove. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Non-monetary, delayed, or distributed harms risk being omitted because they are hard to price or prove."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Non-monetary, delayed, or distributed harms risk being omitted because they are hard to price or prove."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 56, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-056", "ledger_sha256": "eb208244c07bfc5ab3669684da9dfd03bf8283b6a0fb363b50e3aa21f90ce0ae"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Residual Risk Decay Tracking", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:residual_risk_decay_tracking", "slug": "residual_risk_decay_tracking"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 2 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 2}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Many control systems are binary. An account is locked or unlocked. A person is isolated or cleared. A process is under heightened supervision or normal supervision. A flagged actor is restricted or unrestricted. But residual risk often does not behave that way. It fades, sometimes quickly, sometimes slowly, sometimes only after remediation or repeated clean observations.\n\nWhen the system lacks a residual-risk model, two opposite failures appear. Controls may be released too early because a fixed date arrived, or controls may persist too long because nobody has defined what would count as enough safety to release them.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A prior event leaves continuing risk, but the governing process treats that risk as either fully present or fully absent. This causes premature release when residual risk is underestimated, or excessive restriction when risk decline is ignored."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Washout failure requires the same unit to enter a successor condition before an induced state dissipates; a residual risk can exist without any successor measurement.", "slug": "washout_failure"}], "residual_id": "r:residual_risk_decay_tracking:b056_a05_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b056_a05_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when a system has already experienced an incident, exposure, anomaly, conflict, contamination, violation, or other trigger that leaves residual risk. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A triggering event, exposure, incident, decision, anomaly, conflict, contamination, or violation has created residual risk.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A triggering event, exposure, incident, decision, anomaly, conflict, contamination, or violation has created residual risk.", "Use this archetype when a system has already experienced an incident, exposure, anomaly, conflict, contamination, violation, or other trigger that leaves residual risk."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Washout failure requires the same unit to enter a successor condition before an induced state dissipates; a residual risk can exist without any successor measurement.", "slug": "washout_failure"}], "normalized_requirement": "A triggering event, exposure, incident, decision, anomaly, conflict, contamination, or violation has created residual risk.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A triggering event, exposure, incident, decision, anomaly, conflict, contamination, or violation has created residual risk.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Washout failure requires a successor measurement contaminated by a decaying induced state; the state need not be harmful or governed as risk.", "slug": "washout_failure"}], "residual_id": "r:residual_risk_decay_tracking:b056_a05_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b056_a05_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It fades, sometimes quickly, sometimes slowly, sometimes only after remediation or repeated clean observations. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The residual risk plausibly changes over time or with remediation, clean observations, repeated checks, or changed conditions.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The residual risk plausibly changes over time or with remediation, clean observations, repeated checks, or changed conditions.", "It fades, sometimes quickly, sometimes slowly, sometimes only after remediation or repeated clean observations."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Washout failure requires a successor measurement contaminated by a decaying induced state; the state need not be harmful or governed as risk.", "slug": "washout_failure"}], "normalized_requirement": "The residual risk plausibly changes over time or with remediation, clean observations, repeated checks, or changed conditions.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The residual risk plausibly changes over time or with remediation, clean observations, repeated checks, or changed conditions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "There are controls that can be maintained, reduced, stepped down, or released as risk declines.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This causes premature release when residual risk is underestimated, or excessive restriction when risk decline is ignored. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: There are controls that can be maintained, reduced, stepped down, or released as risk declines. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["There are controls that can be maintained, reduced, stepped down, or released as risk declines.", "This causes premature release when residual risk is underestimated, or excessive restriction when risk decline is ignored."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "There are controls that can be maintained, reduced, stepped down, or released as risk declines."}, {"display_text": "Both early release and overlong restriction create meaningful costs, hazards, fairness issues, or operational burdens.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when early release could cause harm, but indefinite restriction creates its own harm: operational delay, exclusion, privacy burden, stigma, workload, lost access, or unnecessary monitoring. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Both early release and overlong restriction create meaningful costs, hazards, fairness issues, or operational burdens. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Both early release and overlong restriction create meaningful costs, hazards, fairness issues, or operational burdens.", "It is especially useful when early release could cause harm, but indefinite restriction creates its own harm: operational delay, exclusion, privacy burden, stigma, workload, lost access, or unnecessary monitoring."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Both early release and overlong restriction create meaningful costs, hazards, fairness issues, or operational burdens."}, {"display_text": "Risk can be monitored directly or through credible proxy signals.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: Risk can be monitored directly or through credible proxy signals. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Risk can be monitored directly or through credible proxy signals."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Risk can be monitored directly or through credible proxy signals."}, {"display_text": "A release or reentry decision must be justified to stakeholders, regulators, operators, or affected parties.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this deployment constraint: A release or reentry decision must be justified to stakeholders, regulators, operators, or affected parties. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A release or reentry decision must be justified to stakeholders, regulators, operators, or affected parties."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "A release or reentry decision must be justified to stakeholders, regulators, operators, or affected parties."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 56, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-056", "ledger_sha256": "eb208244c07bfc5ab3669684da9dfd03bf8283b6a0fb363b50e3aa21f90ce0ae"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Resilience Capacity Building", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:resilience_capacity_building", "slug": "resilience_capacity_building"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 0, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 0 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 0 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 0}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is exposure to disruptive events that exceed normal operating assumptions. The system may be optimized for ordinary conditions, but disruption changes the availability of resources, the reliability of dependencies, the accuracy of information, the demand placed on the system, or the coordination environment.\n\nThe failure is often not a single broken part. It is the absence of prepared capacity: nobody knows which functions matter most, which dependencies will break together, who can change priorities, which resources are available under degraded conditions, how recovery should start, or how lessons become structural changes after the incident.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system is exposed to shocks, disruptions, or volatility that cannot be eliminated and may exceed ordinary operating assumptions."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [], "condition_structure": "DISJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Unavoidable shock exposure.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this source condition requiring clarification: Unavoidable shock exposure. The wording is retained for source review rather than assigned a stronger semantic role.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Unavoidable shock exposure"]}, "function": "MALFORMED", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because the source wording is not structurally clear enough to support a formal trigger role without clarification.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "Unavoidable shock exposure"}, {"display_text": "Critical-function dependency.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when a system faces disruptions that cannot be eliminated and when continuity or recovery of critical functions matters. In this archetype, the relevant source condition requiring clarification is: Critical-function dependency. The wording is retained for source review rather than assigned a stronger semantic role.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Critical-function dependency", "Use this archetype when a system faces disruptions that cannot be eliminated and when continuity or recovery of critical functions matters."]}, "function": "MALFORMED", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because the source wording is not structurally clear enough to support a formal trigger role without clarification.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "Critical-function dependency"}, {"display_text": "Recovery cannot be improvised from zero.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when a system faces disruptions that cannot be eliminated and when continuity or recovery of critical functions matters. In this archetype, the relevant source condition requiring clarification is: Recovery cannot be improvised from zero. The wording is retained for source review rather than assigned a stronger semantic role.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Recovery cannot be improvised from zero", "Use this archetype when a system faces disruptions that cannot be eliminated and when continuity or recovery of critical functions matters."]}, "function": "MALFORMED", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because the source wording is not structurally clear enough to support a formal trigger role without clarification.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Recovery cannot be improvised from zero"}, {"display_text": "Disruption exceeds normal operating assumptions.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The structural problem is exposure to disruptive events that exceed normal operating assumptions. In this archetype, the relevant source condition requiring clarification is: Disruption exceeds normal operating assumptions. The wording is retained for source review rather than assigned a stronger semantic role.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Disruption exceeds normal operating assumptions", "The structural problem is exposure to disruptive events that exceed normal operating assumptions."]}, "function": "MALFORMED", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because the source wording is not structurally clear enough to support a formal trigger role without clarification.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Disruption exceeds normal operating assumptions"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 56, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-056", "ledger_sha256": "eb208244c07bfc5ab3669684da9dfd03bf8283b6a0fb363b50e3aa21f90ce0ae"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Resonance Detuning", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:resonance_detuning", "slug": "resonance_detuning"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is harmful alignment. A repeating trigger and a sensitive response mode become coupled closely enough that each recurrence strengthens the next response. In engineering, this can be literal vibration. In organizations, it can be repeated urgent messages that train everyone to drop into crisis mode. In software, it can be synchronized retries that hit a recovering service exactly when it is vulnerable. In conflict, it can be immediate replies that recreate the emotional conditions for another attack.\n\nThe key diagnostic question is whether the system is amplifying because of repetition and fit. If the problem is just total volume, use load management. If the problem is overshoot around a control target, use oscillation damping. If the problem is spread through a network, use diffusion containment. Resonance Detuning is for cases where timing, phase, coupling, or response sensitivity is the leverage point.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "An external input or internal cycle aligns with a system's response frequency, causing escalating vibration, attention, conflict, panic, or overload."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime is frequency-matched input acting on a system's natural response mode.", "role_mapping": "Repeated aligned input -> periodic drive; vulnerable mode -> natural frequency.", "slug": "resonance", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b056_a07_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A repeating trigger and a sensitive response mode become coupled closely enough that each recurrence strengthens the next response. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Repeated inputs align with a vulnerable response mode.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Repeated inputs align with a vulnerable response mode.", "A repeating trigger and a sensitive response mode become coupled closely enough that each recurrence strengthens the next response."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Resonance", "one_liner": "Amplified response at frequency.", "page_ref": "prime:resonance", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Repeated aligned input -> periodic drive; vulnerable mode -> natural frequency.", "slug": "resonance", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime is frequency-matched input acting on a system's natural response mode."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Repeated inputs align with a vulnerable response mode.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Resonance is specifically amplification through frequency matching and coupling rather than one large shock.", "role_mapping": "Growing response -> resonant amplitude; coupling -> drive-system relation.", "slug": "resonance", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b056_a07_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Good signs include repeated escalation after similar cues, sudden relief when a pause or offset is introduced, synchronized reactions that overload a shared dependency, or response fatigue caused by repetition rather than by one large event. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Amplification grows through coupling rather than through a single large shock.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Amplification grows through coupling rather than through a single large shock.", "Good signs include repeated escalation after similar cues, sudden relief when a pause or offset is introduced, synchronized reactions that overload a shared dependency, or response fatigue caused by repetition rather than by one large event."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Resonance", "one_liner": "Amplified response at frequency.", "page_ref": "prime:resonance", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Growing response -> resonant amplitude; coupling -> drive-system relation.", "slug": "resonance", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Resonance is specifically amplification through frequency matching and coupling rather than one large shock."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Amplification grows through coupling rather than through a single large shock.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A resonant mode may be wholly unwanted and safely suppressed.", "slug": "resonance"}], "residual_id": "r:resonance_detuning:b056_a07_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b056_a07_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Ordinary suppression would destroy useful function. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Ordinary suppression would destroy useful function."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A resonant mode may be wholly unwanted and safely suppressed.", "slug": "resonance"}], "normalized_requirement": "Ordinary suppression would destroy useful function.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Ordinary suppression would destroy useful function.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Timing, phase, channel, or coupling can be changed.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Resonance Detuning is for cases where timing, phase, coupling, or response sensitivity is the leverage point. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: Timing, phase, channel, or coupling can be changed. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Timing, phase, channel, or coupling can be changed.", "Resonance Detuning is for cases where timing, phase, coupling, or response sensitivity is the leverage point."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Timing, phase, channel, or coupling can be changed."}, {"display_text": "Harm can be monitored by amplitude, escalation, overload, or volatility.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Good signs include repeated escalation after similar cues, sudden relief when a pause or offset is introduced, synchronized reactions that overload a shared dependency, or response fatigue caused by repetition rather than by one large event. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: Harm can be monitored by amplitude, escalation, overload, or volatility. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Harm can be monitored by amplitude, escalation, overload, or volatility.", "Good signs include repeated escalation after similar cues, sudden relief when a pause or offset is introduced, synchronized reactions that overload a shared dependency, or response fatigue caused by repetition rather than by one large event."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Harm can be monitored by amplitude, escalation, overload, or volatility."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 56, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-056", "ledger_sha256": "eb208244c07bfc5ab3669684da9dfd03bf8283b6a0fb363b50e3aa21f90ce0ae"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Resonance Tuning", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:resonance_tuning", "slug": "resonance_tuning"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 3 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is timing-blind intervention. The system may be full of activity, messages, training, support, prompts, reviews, or incentives, but those inputs arrive outside the moments when they can be used. Actors then compensate by increasing volume or pressure, which often creates fatigue instead of response.\n\nThis problem appears when useful information arrives after the decision window, learning review happens after forgetting has gone too far, support is offered before readiness, or organizational change material lands outside budget and planning cycles. In each case, the content can be good and the effort sincere, while the phase relation is wrong.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system has cycles, phases, attention windows, readiness moments, or response frequencies that make some timings disproportionately effective, but interventions are delivered ad hoc, continuously, too early, too late, or at a generic cadence. The result is wasted effort, weak uptake, poor retention, missed readiness, or pressure to increase force when timing would have mattered more."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime requires a system with natural frequency and a measurable frequency-response peak.", "role_mapping": "Response rhythm -> natural frequency; learnable response -> gain curve.", "slug": "resonance", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b056_a08_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A weekly reminder, quarterly meeting, or monthly newsletter is Cadence Design unless its interval is chosen because it matches a response rhythm. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The target system has observable or learnable response rhythms.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The target system has observable or learnable response rhythms.", "A weekly reminder, quarterly meeting, or monthly newsletter is Cadence Design unless its interval is chosen because it matches a response rhythm."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Resonance", "one_liner": "Amplified response at frequency.", "page_ref": "prime:resonance", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Response rhythm -> natural frequency; learnable response -> gain curve.", "slug": "resonance", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime requires a system with natural frequency and a measurable frequency-response peak."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The target system has observable or learnable response rhythms.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Resonance varies with driving frequency; it need not imply calendar-time or phase-window differences for an otherwise identical input.", "slug": "resonance"}], "residual_id": "r:resonance_tuning:b056_a08_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b056_a08_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The same input has different effects at different times. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The same input has different effects at different times."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Resonance varies with driving frequency; it need not imply calendar-time or phase-window differences for an otherwise identical input.", "slug": "resonance"}], "normalized_requirement": "The same input has different effects at different times.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The same input has different effects at different times.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A sustained single-frequency drive can produce resonance without an intervention program of repeated phases.", "slug": "resonance"}], "residual_id": "r:resonance_tuning:b056_a08_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b056_a08_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when repeated input is necessary but continuous input is wasteful: learning reviews, follow-up support, campaign messages, practice blocks, organizational rollout support, maintenance prompts, and decision aids. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The desired effect benefits from repeated or phased input.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The desired effect benefits from repeated or phased input.", "It is especially useful when repeated input is necessary but continuous input is wasteful: learning reviews, follow-up support, campaign messages, practice blocks, organizational rollout support, maintenance prompts, and decision aids."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A sustained single-frequency drive can produce resonance without an intervention program of repeated phases.", "slug": "resonance"}], "normalized_requirement": "The desired effect benefits from repeated or phased input.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The desired effect benefits from repeated or phased input.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Untuned timing causes waste or escalation.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Untuned timing causes waste or escalation. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Untuned timing causes waste or escalation."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Untuned timing causes waste or escalation."}, {"display_text": "The response can be monitored without corrupting the system.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: The response can be monitored without corrupting the system. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The response can be monitored without corrupting the system."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The response can be monitored without corrupting the system."}, {"display_text": "Harmful over-resonance is possible.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this deployment constraint: Harmful over-resonance is possible. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Harmful over-resonance is possible."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Harmful over-resonance is possible."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 56, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-056", "ledger_sha256": "eb208244c07bfc5ab3669684da9dfd03bf8283b6a0fb363b50e3aa21f90ce0ae"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Resource Liquefaction", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:resource_liquefaction", "slug": "resource_liquefaction"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 5 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a mismatch between resource value and resource mobility. A system may own, control, or know about something valuable, yet still be unable to use it where demand appears. Inventory may be product-specific. Data may be locked in incompatible schemas. Staff may have adjacent skills that are neither certified nor scheduled for redeployment. Assets may be valuable but not spendable. Rights may be tied to a holder who cannot use them.\n\nThe deeper tension is between specialization and adaptability. Specialization often improves performance in stable settings, but it can trap resources inside local contexts. Resource liquefaction relaxes some of that specificity so resources can serve a broader set of uses.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system has resources with real value, but those resources are locked into forms, locations, ownership claims, formats, skills, contracts, architectures, or obligations that prevent timely redeployment to the place or use where they are most needed."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Slack is deliberately uncommitted deployable capacity, not capacity locked into a low-priority use.", "slug": "system_slack"}], "residual_id": "r:resource_liquefaction:b056_a09_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b056_a09_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when resources are stranded, not absent. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Resources are stranded in low-priority uses while high-priority needs go unmet.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Resources are stranded in low-priority uses while high-priority needs go unmet.", "Use this archetype when resources are stranded, not absent."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Slack is deliberately uncommitted deployable capacity, not capacity locked into a low-priority use.", "slug": "system_slack"}], "normalized_requirement": "Resources are stranded in low-priority uses while high-priority needs go unmet.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Resources are stranded in low-priority uses while high-priority needs go unmet.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P093-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a resource, a selected redeployment operation, a destination or use, and a response deadline.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A valued resource must undergo a redeployment operation to serve a need within a response window.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail operation duration exceeding the deadline rather than a slow process that still finishes in time.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The redeployment operation takes longer than the available response window.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve deadline-relevant untimeliness of redeployment.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The resource is not usable in the needed form or place before the response window closes.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires resource conversion.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The delayed operation is conversion of the resource into a usable form.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires resource transfer.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The delayed operation is transfer of the resource to the needed holder or location.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires resource translation.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The delayed operation is translation into a usable format, representation, or skill form.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Resource conversion, transfer, or translation takes longer than the response window permits.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "resource redeployment operation exceeds the response window", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P093-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Adaptive capacity can be high or low without any asset-conversion process or response deadline.", "slug": "adaptive_capacity"}], "residual_id": "r:resource_liquefaction:b056_a09_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b056_a09_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Conversion, transfer, or translation takes longer than the response window allows. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Conversion, transfer, or translation takes longer than the response window allows."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Adaptive capacity can be high or low without any asset-conversion process or response deadline.", "slug": "adaptive_capacity"}], "normalized_requirement": "Conversion, transfer, or translation takes longer than the response window allows.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Conversion, transfer, or translation takes longer than the response window allows.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P093-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O4", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O4", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O5", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O5", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O6", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O6", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve resources and at least one interoperability-defining representation or governance layer.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Resources are represented, governed, or accessed through differing units, formats, contracts, or interfaces.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must make incompatibility causal for the difficulty, not merely present alongside it.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The selected difference makes the selected resource operation difficult.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This incompatibility-type branch requires unit mismatch.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The resources use different units.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This incompatibility-type branch requires format mismatch.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The resources use different formats.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This incompatibility-type branch requires contractual mismatch or incompatibility.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The resources are governed by different contracts.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This incompatibility-type branch requires interface mismatch.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The resources expose different interfaces.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This operation branch requires impaired comparability.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The incompatibility makes the resources hard to compare.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This operation branch requires impaired exchange or substitution.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The incompatibility makes the resources hard to exchange.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Different resource units, formats, contracts, or interfaces make resources difficult to compare or exchange.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "resource incompatibility impairs comparison or exchange", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P093-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Slack can already be fungible and does not entail exchange incompatibility.", "slug": "system_slack"}], "residual_id": "r:resource_liquefaction:b056_a09_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b056_a09_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system has resources with real value, but those resources are locked into forms, locations, ownership claims, formats, skills, contracts, architectures, or obligations that prevent timely redeployment to the place or use where they are most needed. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Different units, formats, contracts, or interfaces make resources hard to compare or exchange.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Different units, formats, contracts, or interfaces make resources hard to compare or exchange.", "A system has resources with real value, but those resources are locked into forms, locations, ownership claims, formats, skills, contracts, architectures, or obligations that prevent timely redeployment to the place or use where they are most needed."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Timing-only mismatch remains a counterexample without the guard; the single explicit interface branch instead fixes incompatible equipment fittings or communications plans that prevent resource exchange.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Mutual-aid mismatch", "one_liner": "The failure mode in which external support to an overwhelmed jurisdiction matches the gap in category but does not couple at the integration interface — wrong fittings, wrong radio plan, missing credentials, or post-peak arrival — so nominal aid yields no incremental capability.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:mutual_aid_mismatch", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1", "O6"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "mutual_aid_mismatch_is_interface_incompatibility", "predicate": "The mutual-aid mismatch is an incompatible physical or communications interface rather than a timing-only mismatch.", "rationale": "The retained edge preserves the source's principal roles, relation direction, modality, and one complete DNF branch under universal necessity; any guard is one anchored atomic branch or domain selection."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "mutual_aid_mismatch"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "mutual_aid_mismatch_is_interface_incompatibility"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "mutual_aid_mismatch", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P093-C12-U1", "why_it_fits": "The candidate directly supplies failed resource exchange caused by donor-receiver mismatch. One explicit branch selection limits that mismatch to its named physical or communications interface subtype."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Different units, formats, contracts, or interfaces make resources hard to compare or exchange.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Specialized capacity can still contribute to adaptive capacity through a diverse portfolio and need not be overcoupled.", "slug": "adaptive_capacity"}], "residual_id": "r:resource_liquefaction:b056_a09_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b056_a09_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially relevant when one part of a system has useful capacity while another part faces scarcity, but the resource cannot move because it is bespoke, incompatible, undocumented, legally fixed, role-bound, technically coupled, or hard to value. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Specialized capacity is valuable but too coupled to one product, team, location, or workflow.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Specialized capacity is valuable but too coupled to one product, team, location, or workflow.", "It is especially relevant when one part of a system has useful capacity while another part faces scarcity, but the resource cannot move because it is bespoke, incompatible, undocumented, legally fixed, role-bound, technically coupled, or hard to value."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Specialized capacity can still contribute to adaptive capacity through a diverse portfolio and need not be overcoupled.", "slug": "adaptive_capacity"}], "normalized_requirement": "Specialized capacity is valuable but too coupled to one product, team, location, or workflow.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Specialized capacity is valuable but too coupled to one product, team, location, or workflow.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A system can hold purposeful slack without acquiring any additional resource or stranding an equivalent.", "slug": "system_slack"}], "residual_id": "r:resource_liquefaction:b056_a09_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b056_a09_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A system repeatedly acquires new resources while equivalent resources elsewhere remain unusable. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A system repeatedly acquires new resources while equivalent resources elsewhere remain unusable."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A system can hold purposeful slack without acquiring any additional resource or stranding an equivalent.", "slug": "system_slack"}], "normalized_requirement": "A system repeatedly acquires new resources while equivalent resources elsewhere remain unusable.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A system repeatedly acquires new resources while equivalent resources elsewhere remain unusable.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 56, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-056", "ledger_sha256": "eb208244c07bfc5ab3669684da9dfd03bf8283b6a0fb363b50e3aa21f90ce0ae"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Resource Rationing", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:resource_rationing", "slug": "resource_rationing"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 3 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Scarcity makes allocation unavoidable but does not determine the allocation principle. In the absence of an explicit rationing regime, distribution still occurs: higher-income claimants pay scarcity prices; people with more time wait longer; digitally fluent people refresh portals; institutions use reserved contacts; frontline workers improvise; better-documented claims appear more real; and people facing the highest burden may disappear from observed demand. The system can therefore report that supply was fully used while failing to see suppressed claims and avoidable harm.\n\nThe structural problem has four coupled layers. First is a physical or operational gap between supply and eligible demand. Second is a normative choice about equality, need, urgency, expected benefit, essential function, reciprocity, or another distributive principle. Third is an administrative translation of that principle into claimant units, evidence rules, decisions, reasons, appeals, and enforcement. Fourth is a temporal obligation to review and end extraordinary limits as scarcity changes. Failure at any layer corrupts the others.\n\nRationing also creates endogenous behavior. Claimants may accelerate demand, split identities, stockpile, conceal transfers, seek private channels, or avoid applying because the process feels futile. Administrators may create undocumented exceptions to prevent visible harm. Suppliers may prefer profitable side channels. These responses change observed demand and distribution, so the regime must monitor evasion and burden without assuming every workaround is abuse.\n\nFinally, the intervention operates under severe legitimacy pressure. Every denial communicates whose claim counted and which value governed the sacrifice. A technically consistent rule can still be illegitimate if the shortage is manufactured, the principle is unjustified, the evidence burden is inaccessible, the appeal arrives too late, or privileged actors bypass the public rule. Resource Rationing therefore treats legitimacy, explanation, and correction as operating requirements rather than public-relations additions.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Some claims must receive less, later, substitute, or no access, but implicit allocation channels hide the governing values and concentrate burden on actors with less money, time, documentation, influence, or technical access."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime requires bounded supply insufficient for competing simultaneous demand within the relevant window.", "role_mapping": "Demand -> competing claims; supply -> finite rivalrous resource.", "slug": "scarcity", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b056_a10_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use Resource Rationing when the shortage is consequential, residual, and unavoidable within the decision window. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Demand exceeds bounded supply within a consequential time window.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Demand exceeds bounded supply within a consequential time window.", "Use Resource Rationing when the shortage is consequential, residual, and unavoidable within the decision window."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Scarcity", "one_liner": "A finite resource is insufficient to satisfy all competing wants.", "page_ref": "prime:scarcity", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Demand -> competing claims; supply -> finite rivalrous resource.", "slug": "scarcity", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime requires bounded supply insufficient for competing simultaneous demand within the relevant window."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Demand exceeds bounded supply within a consequential time window.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Scarcity can be relieved quickly by added supply or reduced demand and does not define eligibility.", "slug": "scarcity"}], "residual_id": "r:resource_rationing:b056_a10_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b056_a10_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "First is a physical or operational gap between supply and eligible demand. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Near-term recovery and demand reduction cannot satisfy every eligible claim.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Near-term recovery and demand reduction cannot satisfy every eligible claim.", "First is a physical or operational gap between supply and eligible demand."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Scarcity can be relieved quickly by added supply or reduced demand and does not define eligibility.", "slug": "scarcity"}], "normalized_requirement": "Near-term recovery and demand reduction cannot satisfy every eligible claim.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Near-term recovery and demand reduction cannot satisfy every eligible claim.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P093-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O9"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve scarcity or constrained access, multiple claimants, and an implicit allocation mechanism.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A scarce-resource setting allocates access or burden among competing claimants through an implicit channel.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve hidden or unacknowledged allocation rather than an explicit rationing decision.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The governing allocation rule or value choice remains implicit.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail harm allocation through the channel rather than neutral sorting with no burden.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The implicit channel distributes harm among claimants.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the source's 'would distribute' modality rather than require that the allocation has already completed.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The harm distribution is a prospective consequence of allowing implicit allocation to operate.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires allocation through ability or willingness to pay.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The implicit allocation channel is price.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires allocation through waiting time or deferred access.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The implicit allocation channel is delay.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires allocation through documentation or administrative burden.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The implicit allocation channel is paperwork.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires allocation through political, social, or organizational influence.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The implicit allocation channel is influence.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires allocation through unequal technical capability or access.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "The implicit allocation channel is technical advantage.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Implicit allocation would distribute harm through price, delay, paperwork, influence, or technical advantage.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "implicit allocation distributes harm through a listed access channel", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P093-C13-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Scarcity forces allocation but does not entail an implicit or inequitable allocation channel.", "slug": "scarcity"}], "residual_id": "r:resource_rationing:b056_a10_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b056_a10_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Some claims must receive less, later, substitute, or no access, but implicit allocation channels hide the governing values and concentrate burden on actors with less money, time, documentation, influence, or technical access. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Implicit allocation would distribute harm through price, delay, paperwork, influence, or technical advantage.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Implicit allocation would distribute harm through price, delay, paperwork, influence, or technical advantage.", "Some claims must receive less, later, substitute, or no access, but implicit allocation channels hide the governing values and concentrate burden on actors with less money, time, documentation, influence, or technical access."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Scarcity forces allocation but does not entail an implicit or inequitable allocation channel.", "slug": "scarcity"}], "normalized_requirement": "Implicit allocation would distribute harm through price, delay, paperwork, influence, or technical advantage.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Implicit allocation would distribute harm through price, delay, paperwork, influence, or technical advantage.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 56, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-056", "ledger_sha256": "eb208244c07bfc5ab3669684da9dfd03bf8283b6a0fb363b50e3aa21f90ce0ae"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Response Repertoire Expansion", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:response_repertoire_expansion", "slug": "response_repertoire_expansion"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a **response gap**. The world presents a case class the system must handle, but the current repertoire has no viable move. People then improvise, escalate unnecessarily, refuse the case, stretch a generic response beyond its limits, or repeatedly fail in the same way.\n\nThis gap is not just ignorance. It may be caused by missing skills, missing tools, missing authority, missing procedures, missing service tiers, missing materials, or missing resources. The pattern becomes archetypal when the gap recurs across domains: incident teams, classrooms, hospitals’ operations teams, public agencies, factories, platforms, and service organizations all eventually meet situations their current repertoire cannot cover.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "The environment presents recurring case classes, disturbances, needs, or failures for which the system has no adequate available response, causing improvisation, unnecessary escalation, brittle refusal, or repeated failure."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Cognitive flexibility requires multiple held responses and can operate without any out-of-repertoire disturbance.", "slug": "cognitive_flexibility"}], "residual_id": "r:response_repertoire_expansion:b056_a11_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b056_a11_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when a recurring class of disturbance, need, exception, failure, or request has no adequate response in the current system. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A recurring disturbance class cannot be handled by any current procedure, role, tool, or authority.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A recurring disturbance class cannot be handled by any current procedure, role, tool, or authority.", "Use this archetype when a recurring class of disturbance, need, exception, failure, or request has no adequate response in the current system."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Cognitive flexibility requires multiple held responses and can operate without any out-of-repertoire disturbance.", "slug": "cognitive_flexibility"}], "normalized_requirement": "A recurring disturbance class cannot be handled by any current procedure, role, tool, or authority.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A recurring disturbance class cannot be handled by any current procedure, role, tool, or authority.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P093-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve case, ordinary-responder, and escalation roles.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An ordinary responder encounters a case and an escalation path is available or used.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve ordinary case status rather than justify escalation by genuine exceptionality.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The case is not truly exceptional.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail a repertoire gap rather than a viable move that the responder simply declines to use.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The ordinary responder lacks a viable move for the case.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must make the repertoire gap causal for escalation.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The lack of a viable ordinary response causes the case to escalate.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "An ordinary case escalates because the ordinary responder lacks a viable move, not because the case is truly exceptional.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "ordinary case escalates because responder repertoire lacks a viable move", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P093-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A repertoire gap need not involve organizational escalation.", "slug": "cognitive_flexibility"}], "residual_id": "r:response_repertoire_expansion:b056_a11_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b056_a11_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The world presents a case class the system must handle, but the current repertoire has no viable move. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Cases escalate because ordinary responders lack a viable move, not because the case is truly exceptional.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Cases escalate because ordinary responders lack a viable move, not because the case is truly exceptional.", "The world presents a case class the system must handle, but the current repertoire has no viable move."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A repertoire gap need not involve organizational escalation.", "slug": "cognitive_flexibility"}], "normalized_requirement": "Cases escalate because ordinary responders lack a viable move, not because the case is truly exceptional.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Cases escalate because ordinary responders lack a viable move, not because the case is truly exceptional.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A changed context may be handled by switching among already-held frames; novelty outside the repertoire is not mandatory.", "slug": "cognitive_flexibility"}], "residual_id": "r:response_repertoire_expansion:b056_a11_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b056_a11_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when a recurring class of disturbance, need, exception, failure, or request has no adequate response in the current system. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A changed environment introduces a new class of demand, risk, constraint, learner need, or failure mode.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A changed environment introduces a new class of demand, risk, constraint, learner need, or failure mode.", "Use this archetype when a recurring class of disturbance, need, exception, failure, or request has no adequate response in the current system."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A changed context may be handled by switching among already-held frames; novelty outside the repertoire is not mandatory.", "slug": "cognitive_flexibility"}], "normalized_requirement": "A changed environment introduces a new class of demand, risk, constraint, learner need, or failure mode.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A changed environment introduces a new class of demand, risk, constraint, learner need, or failure mode.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A system can perseverate with an applicable response because its switching trigger fails, not because the response is outside its intended range.", "slug": "cognitive_flexibility"}], "residual_id": "r:response_repertoire_expansion:b056_a11_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b056_a11_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "People then improvise, escalate unnecessarily, refuse the case, stretch a generic response beyond its limits, or repeatedly fail in the same way. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The same response is repeatedly stretched beyond its intended range.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The same response is repeatedly stretched beyond its intended range.", "People then improvise, escalate unnecessarily, refuse the case, stretch a generic response beyond its limits, or repeatedly fail in the same way."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A system can perseverate with an applicable response because its switching trigger fails, not because the response is outside its intended range.", "slug": "cognitive_flexibility"}], "normalized_requirement": "The same response is repeatedly stretched beyond its intended range.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The same response is repeatedly stretched beyond its intended range.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Frontline actors repeatedly improvise unofficial workarounds for the same kind of case.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "People then improvise, escalate unnecessarily, refuse the case, stretch a generic response beyond its limits, or repeatedly fail in the same way. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Frontline actors repeatedly improvise unofficial workarounds for the same kind of case. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Frontline actors repeatedly improvise unofficial workarounds for the same kind of case.", "People then improvise, escalate unnecessarily, refuse the case, stretch a generic response beyond its limits, or repeatedly fail in the same way."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "Frontline actors repeatedly improvise unofficial workarounds for the same kind of case."}, {"display_text": "A first-wave variety map shows a stable mismatch between disturbance classes and response options.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The environment presents recurring case classes, disturbances, needs, or failures for which the system has no adequate available response, causing improvisation, unnecessary escalation, brittle refusal, or repeated failure. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: A first-wave variety map shows a stable mismatch between disturbance classes and response options. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A first-wave variety map shows a stable mismatch between disturbance classes and response options.", "The environment presents recurring case classes, disturbances, needs, or failures for which the system has no adequate available response, causing improvisation, unnecessary escalation, brittle refusal, or repeated failure."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "A first-wave variety map shows a stable mismatch between disturbance classes and response options."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 56, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-056", "ledger_sha256": "eb208244c07bfc5ab3669684da9dfd03bf8283b6a0fb363b50e3aa21f90ce0ae"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Responsibility Assignment for Action", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:responsibility_assignment_for_action", "slug": "responsibility_assignment_for_action"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 4 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is responsibility diffusion. A condition is visible to many people, but the system does not convert visibility into a clear first move. Everyone has enough awareness to assume someone else may be handling it, and no one has enough explicit responsibility to be sure they must act.\n\nThis produces unattended risks, late escalation, duplicate partial responses, vague meeting action items, and retrospective blame. The failure is often misread as apathy, when the deeper structure is ambiguous ownership, unclear triggers, missing backup, or responsibility without authority.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A problem, risk, request, or agreed action exists in a group context, but responsibility is ambiguous enough that each actor can assume someone else will act. The result is delay, duplicated effort, unmanaged escalation, or silent nonresponse."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime requires distributed obligation to reduce per-agent motivation and create an accountability gap.", "role_mapping": "Multiple observers -> distributed agents; no accepted first mover -> reduced ownership.", "slug": "responsibility_diffusion", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The exact prime requires multiple potential responders whose individual intervention probability falls with group size.", "role_mapping": "Observers -> potential helpers; no first mover -> suppressed intervention.", "slug": "bystander_effect", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b056_a12_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A condition is visible to many people, but the system does not convert visibility into a clear first move. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Multiple people observe the same condition, but no one has explicitly accepted first-mover responsibility.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Multiple people observe the same condition, but no one has explicitly accepted first-mover responsibility.", "A condition is visible to many people, but the system does not convert visibility into a clear first move."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Responsibility Diffusion", "one_liner": "Spreading responsibility reduces individual accountability perception.", "page_ref": "prime:responsibility_diffusion", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Multiple observers -> distributed agents; no accepted first mover -> reduced ownership.", "slug": "responsibility_diffusion", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime requires distributed obligation to reduce per-agent motivation and create an accountability gap."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Bystander Effect", "one_liner": "A coordination failure in which each potential responder's chance of acting falls as the group grows, so more available helpers can paradoxically mean less help.", "page_ref": "prime:bystander_effect", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Observers -> potential helpers; no first mover -> suppressed intervention.", "slug": "bystander_effect", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime requires multiple potential responders whose individual intervention probability falls with group size."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Multiple people observe the same condition, but no one has explicitly accepted first-mover responsibility.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P093-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a group-decision process and a prospective action produced by that decision.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A group decision identifies or requires a desired action to be carried out.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail absence of a specifically identified actor with primary execution responsibility.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "No named primary owner is assigned to the action.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "A group decision produces a desired action without assigning a named owner.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "group-decided action lacks a named owner", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P093-C15-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P093-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a group-decision process and a prospective action produced by that decision.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A group decision identifies or requires a desired action to be carried out.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail absence of a designated substitute or secondary owner for execution continuity.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "No backup actor is assigned to the action.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "A group decision produces a desired action without assigning a backup owner.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "group-decided action lacks a backup owner", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P093-C15-U2"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P093-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a group-decision process and a prospective action produced by that decision.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A group decision identifies or requires a desired action to be carried out.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail absence of a defined execution-status reporting path.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "No status-update event, obligation, or recipient is specified for the action.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "A group decision produces a desired action without specifying a status update.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "group-decided action lacks a status-update obligation", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P093-C15-U3"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P093-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a group-decision process and a prospective action produced by that decision.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A group decision identifies or requires a desired action to be carried out.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail absence of a defined escalation destination or path for execution failure.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "No route is specified for escalating a blocked, delayed, or failed action.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "A group decision produces a desired action without specifying an escalation route.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "group-decided action lacks an escalation route", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P093-C15-U4"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Responsibility attribution can assign credit or blame retrospectively without any group decision or prospective owner.", "slug": "responsibility_attribution"}], "residual_id": "r:responsibility_assignment_for_action:b056_a12_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b056_a12_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This produces unattended risks, late escalation, duplicate partial responses, vague meeting action items, and retrospective blame. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A group decision produces a desired action without assigning a named owner, backup, status update, or escalation route.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A group decision produces a desired action without assigning a named owner, backup, status update, or escalation route.", "This produces unattended risks, late escalation, duplicate partial responses, vague meeting action items, and retrospective blame."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 4, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 4}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Responsibility attribution can assign credit or blame retrospectively without any group decision or prospective owner.", "slug": "responsibility_attribution"}], "normalized_requirement": "A group decision produces a desired action without assigning a named owner, backup, status update, or escalation route.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 4 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A group decision produces a desired action without assigning a named owner, backup, status update, or escalation route.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P094-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve recurrence rather than a one-off event.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An operational event recurs.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a response obligation attached to the event.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The recurring event requires an operational response.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires informal rather than established coverage.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Coverage for the response is informal.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires coverage that no longer reflects current conditions.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Coverage for the response is out of date.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires response coverage to depend on discretionary individual action.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Coverage for the response depends on personal initiative.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "A recurring operational event requires a response, while its coverage is informal, outdated, or dependent on personal initiative.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "recurring response requirement has defective coverage", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P094-C01-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Diffusion can occur under current formal coverage and need not involve a recurring operational event.", "slug": "responsibility_diffusion"}], "residual_id": "r:responsibility_assignment_for_action:b056_a12_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b056_a12_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The system benefits from collective awareness, but action requires local ownership, authority, and a visible path from trigger to response. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A recurring operational event requires response, but coverage is informal, out of date, or dependent on personal initiative.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A recurring operational event requires response, but coverage is informal, out of date, or dependent on personal initiative.", "The system benefits from collective awareness, but action requires local ownership, authority, and a visible path from trigger to response."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Diffusion can occur under current formal coverage and need not involve a recurring operational event.", "slug": "responsibility_diffusion"}], "normalized_requirement": "A recurring operational event requires response, but coverage is informal, out of date, or dependent on personal initiative.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A recurring operational event requires response, but coverage is informal, out of date, or dependent on personal initiative.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P094-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"], ["O1", "O3"], ["O1", "O4"], ["O1", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve cross-locus responsibility rather than an assignment wholly inside one locus.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A responsibility spans more than one operational locus.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a team boundary.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The crossed boundary is between teams.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a shift boundary.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The crossed boundary is between shifts.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a jurisdictional boundary.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The crossed boundary is jurisdictional.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires an organizational boundary.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The crossed boundary is organizational.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Responsibility spans more than one team, shift, jurisdiction, or organizational boundary.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "responsibility crosses an operational boundary", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P094-C02-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Responsibility can diffuse within one stable co-located group.", "slug": "responsibility_diffusion"}], "residual_id": "r:responsibility_assignment_for_action:b056_a12_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b056_a12_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when delay is costly, when responsibility crosses boundaries, when actions recur over time, or when a meeting or decision regularly ends with agreement but no accountable follow-through. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Responsibility crosses teams, shifts, jurisdictions, or organizational boundaries.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Responsibility crosses teams, shifts, jurisdictions, or organizational boundaries.", "It is especially useful when delay is costly, when responsibility crosses boundaries, when actions recur over time, or when a meeting or decision regularly ends with agreement but no accountable follow-through."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Responsibility can diffuse within one stable co-located group.", "slug": "responsibility_diffusion"}], "normalized_requirement": "Responsibility crosses teams, shifts, jurisdictions, or organizational boundaries.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Responsibility crosses teams, shifts, jurisdictions, or organizational boundaries.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The cost of delayed action is high enough that informal goodwill is insufficient.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A problem, risk, request, or agreed action exists in a group context, but responsibility is ambiguous enough that each actor can assume someone else will act. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The cost of delayed action is high enough that informal goodwill is insufficient. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The cost of delayed action is high enough that informal goodwill is insufficient.", "A problem, risk, request, or agreed action exists in a group context, but responsibility is ambiguous enough that each actor can assume someone else will act."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The cost of delayed action is high enough that informal goodwill is insufficient."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 56, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-056", "ledger_sha256": "eb208244c07bfc5ab3669684da9dfd03bf8283b6a0fb363b50e3aa21f90ce0ae"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Restraint–Orientation Degree Decoupling", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:restraint_orientation_degree_decoupling", "slug": "restraint_orientation_degree_decoupling"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 2 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 2}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The same path is being asked both to carry primary load and to govern orientation.\nEnvironmental load therefore becomes actuator torque, and changing one coordinate\ndisturbs other coordinates or the anchor itself.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "The same structural path carries dominant load and governs orientation, so environmental load becomes actuator torque and coordinate changes disturb one another."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "This branch preserves the complete remedy-free diagnostic route; goals, feasibility clauses, gates, deployment constraints, and supporting context remain outside the DNF."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "EXT001-C082", "dnf": [["EXT001-U082-O1"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"obligation_id": "EXT001-U082-O1", "predicate": "The same path is required both to carry primary load and to govern orientation."}], "predicate": "The same path is required both to carry primary load and to govern orientation.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "The same path is required both to carry primary load and to govern orientation.", "unit_id": "EXT001-U082"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"catalog_exhaustion": "CONDITION_LEVEL", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact record describes an intervention, control, or achieved configuration rather than a pre-existing situation that necessarily entails the atom.", "slug": "fallback_path"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The same path is required both to carry primary load and to govern orientation.", "slug": "desire_path"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The same path is required both to carry primary load and to govern orientation.", "slug": "interior_lines"}], "residual_id": "EXT001:restraint_orientation_degree_decoupling:C01", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding."}}, "condition_id": "ext001_restraint_orientation_degree_decoupling_a01", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: The same path is required both to carry primary load and to govern orientation.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The same path is required both to carry primary load and to govern orientation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact record describes an intervention, control, or achieved configuration rather than a pre-existing situation that necessarily entails the atom.", "slug": "fallback_path"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The same path is required both to carry primary load and to govern orientation.", "slug": "desire_path"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The same path is required both to carry primary load and to govern orientation.", "slug": "interior_lines"}], "normalized_requirement": "The same path is required both to carry primary load and to govern orientation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The same path is required both to carry primary load and to govern orientation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "EXT001-C083", "dnf": [["EXT001-U083-O1"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"obligation_id": "EXT001-U083-O1", "predicate": "Changing orientation transfers environmental load into actuator torque or disturbs other coordinates or the anchor."}], "predicate": "Changing orientation transfers environmental load into actuator torque or disturbs other coordinates or the anchor.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Changing orientation transfers environmental load into actuator torque or disturbs other coordinates or the anchor.", "unit_id": "EXT001-U083"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"catalog_exhaustion": "CONDITION_LEVEL", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Changing orientation transfers environmental load into actuator torque or disturbs other coordinates or the anchor.", "slug": "maneuver"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Changing orientation transfers environmental load into actuator torque or disturbs other coordinates or the anchor.", "slug": "inertia"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Changing orientation transfers environmental load into actuator torque or disturbs other coordinates or the anchor.", "slug": "accommodation"}], "residual_id": "EXT001:restraint_orientation_degree_decoupling:C02", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding."}}, "condition_id": "ext001_restraint_orientation_degree_decoupling_a02", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: Changing orientation transfers environmental load into actuator torque or disturbs other coordinates or the anchor.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Changing orientation transfers environmental load into actuator torque or disturbs other coordinates or the anchor."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Changing orientation transfers environmental load into actuator torque or disturbs other coordinates or the anchor.", "slug": "maneuver"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Changing orientation transfers environmental load into actuator torque or disturbs other coordinates or the anchor.", "slug": "inertia"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Changing orientation transfers environmental load into actuator torque or disturbs other coordinates or the anchor.", "slug": "accommodation"}], "normalized_requirement": "Changing orientation transfers environmental load into actuator torque or disturbs other coordinates or the anchor.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Changing orientation transfers environmental load into actuator torque or disturbs other coordinates or the anchor.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A separate structure can carry the dominant load while orientation remains controllable.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: A separate structure can carry the dominant load while orientation remains controllable. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A separate structure can carry the dominant load while orientation remains controllable.", "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "A separate structure can carry the dominant load while orientation remains controllable."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"candidate_ledger_sha256": "96f72d2139077fd57bf795048ebef33b3fd574b20963170080ec916b5b3b92fe", "extension_id": "new-archetypes-extension-001", "ledger_id": "prime-production-v1.2-extension-001", "ledger_sha256": "9644520614744632d1d36da44b1acd77ce432852c6083eb871203521c166efce"}, "base_projection_sha256": "841e0c7f3cb8e8054475ad29a8a14745a416b4fc115559a44878b94292e673ec", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "ca09ed9fe1598ce7072755b530de5553f5ee0a7cd64ae82d9e4a4e2149a37788", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Restricted-Issuance / Open-Verification Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:restricted_issuance_open_verification_design", "slug": "restricted_issuance_open_verification_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 5, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system needs downstream parties to trust an artifact or claim, but giving every downstream party the ability to verify it by contacting the issuer, seeing privileged evidence, or sharing issuer secrets would be slow, privacy-invasive, insecure, or impossible. If verification and issuance are not separated, verifiers either cannot check validity at all or gain too much power when they do.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system needs downstream parties to trust an artifact or claim, but giving every downstream party the ability to verify it by contacting the issuer, seeing privileged evidence, or sharing issuer secrets would be slow, privacy-invasive, insecure, or impossible. If verification and issuance are not separated, verifiers either cannot check validity at all or gain too much power when they do."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime requires an open, potentially large and mutually untrusting verifier population.", "role_mapping": "Distributed parties -> open verifiers; validity decision -> checking artifact.", "slug": "capability_separation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b056_a13_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "If verification and issuance are not separated, verifiers either cannot check validity at all or gain too much power when they do. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Many distributed verifiers need a validity decision.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Many distributed verifiers need a validity decision", "If verification and issuance are not separated, verifiers either cannot check validity at all or gain too much power when they do."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Capability Separation", "one_liner": "Issuance is restricted to a privileged party while verification is open, tied by a forgery-prevention mechanism.", "page_ref": "prime:capability_separation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Distributed parties -> open verifiers; validity decision -> checking artifact.", "slug": "capability_separation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime requires an open, potentially large and mutually untrusting verifier population."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Many distributed verifiers need a validity decision", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Restricted issuance by one privileged party or designated mechanism is mandatory.", "role_mapping": "Scarce issuance -> restricted issuer.", "slug": "capability_separation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b056_a13_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Issuance must remain scarce or privileged. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Issuance must remain scarce or privileged"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Capability Separation", "one_liner": "Issuance is restricted to a privileged party while verification is open, tied by a forgery-prevention mechanism.", "page_ref": "prime:capability_separation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Scarce issuance -> restricted issuer.", "slug": "capability_separation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Restricted issuance by one privileged party or designated mechanism is mandatory."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Issuance must remain scarce or privileged", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A forgery-prevention mechanism is structural because invalid issuance would collapse trust in the artifact.", "role_mapping": "Valuable forgery -> incentive to counterfeit; prevention -> issuer-distinguishing mechanism.", "slug": "capability_separation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b056_a13_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Forgery would be valuable or harmful. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Forgery would be valuable or harmful"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Capability Separation", "one_liner": "Issuance is restricted to a privileged party while verification is open, tied by a forgery-prevention mechanism.", "page_ref": "prime:capability_separation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Valuable forgery -> incentive to counterfeit; prevention -> issuer-distinguishing mechanism.", "slug": "capability_separation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A forgery-prevention mechanism is structural because invalid issuance would collapse trust in the artifact."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Forgery would be valuable or harmful", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Open verification must not reveal the issuer-distinguishing secret or enable issuing.", "role_mapping": "No privileged disclosure -> open check; retained secret -> asymmetry invariant.", "slug": "capability_separation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b056_a13_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Open verification increases trust, scalability, and transparency, but every new verifier is also a potential leakage path if checking requires issuance capability. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Verification should not require privileged disclosure.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Verification should not require privileged disclosure", "Open verification increases trust, scalability, and transparency, but every new verifier is also a potential leakage path if checking requires issuance capability."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Capability Separation", "one_liner": "Issuance is restricted to a privileged party while verification is open, tied by a forgery-prevention mechanism.", "page_ref": "prime:capability_separation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "No privileged disclosure -> open check; retained secret -> asymmetry invariant.", "slug": "capability_separation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Open verification must not reveal the issuer-distinguishing secret or enable issuing."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Verification should not require privileged disclosure", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The artifact carries trust beyond the issuer into an open verifier population.", "role_mapping": "Traveling artifact -> issued object; beyond control -> open verifiers.", "slug": "capability_separation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b056_a13_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system needs downstream parties to trust an artifact or claim, but giving every downstream party the ability to verify it by contacting the issuer, seeing privileged evidence, or sharing issuer secrets would be slow, privacy-invasive, insecure, or impossible. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The artifact travels beyond the issuer’s immediate control.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The artifact travels beyond the issuer’s immediate control", "A system needs downstream parties to trust an artifact or claim, but giving every downstream party the ability to verify it by contacting the issuer, seeing privileged evidence, or sharing issuer secrets would be slow, privacy-invasive, insecure, or impossible."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Capability Separation", "one_liner": "Issuance is restricted to a privileged party while verification is open, tied by a forgery-prevention mechanism.", "page_ref": "prime:capability_separation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Traveling artifact -> issued object; beyond control -> open verifiers.", "slug": "capability_separation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The artifact carries trust beyond the issuer into an open verifier population."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The artifact travels beyond the issuer’s immediate control", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Validity can change over time.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this deployment constraint: Validity can change over time. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Validity can change over time"]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Validity can change over time"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 56, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-056", "ledger_sha256": "eb208244c07bfc5ab3669684da9dfd03bf8283b6a0fb363b50e3aa21f90ce0ae"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Resummation and Nonperturbative Extrapolation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:resummation_and_nonperturbative_extrapolation", "slug": "resummation_and_nonperturbative_extrapolation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 3 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a mismatch between information and representation. A local expansion contains organized evidence about a target quantity, but the representation in which that evidence was produced is poorly suited to direct use where the answer is needed. Termwise addition assumes that later terms behave like smaller corrections. Near a singularity, at strong coupling, or in an asymptotic regime, that assumption can fail even though the coefficients remain highly informative.\n\nSeveral distinct failures can look alike numerically. Slow convergence means the series is valid but inefficient. Asymptotic divergence means finite truncations can be useful even though the infinite sum does not exist in the ordinary sense. A finite convergence radius means a singularity blocks the local power-series representation. Oscillation may indicate alternating recoverable structure or unresolved competing scales. Factorial growth may make Borel transformation appropriate, while same-sign growth and positive-axis singularities may create a genuine reconstruction ambiguity. A boundary layer indicates that the dominant balance changes by region. A phase transition may indicate that one analytic branch cannot represent the target state at all.\n\nTreating these as one generic “convergence problem” leads to method mismatch. Sequence acceleration cannot cure a missing phase. A rational approximation can invent pole-zero defects. Borel integration can be ambiguous when singularities lie on the integration path. A high-order polynomial can become smoother while becoming less trustworthy. The archetype therefore begins with classification of the breakdown, not with selection of a favorite transform.\n\nThere is also a governance problem. Analysts often explore many approximants, scale choices, maps, and orders. If only the successful-looking result survives into the report, transform selection becomes an unrecorded researcher degree of freedom. The result may be reproducible computationally yet unauditable epistemically. A continuation ensemble and rejection log are structural safeguards against this form of selection bias.\n\nFinally, some information is not contained in the perturbative sector at all. Contributions that are exponentially small in the expansion parameter can vanish to every algebraic order and still matter in the target regime. Topological sectors, tunneling-like effects, new saddles, or new boundary data may be required. The nonperturbative completion boundary is not a confession of failure. It is the line between information recovered from the local sequence and information that must enter from elsewhere.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A tractable local construction produces coefficients, correction terms, moments, or samples that are informative near a reference regime but cannot be used reliably by naive truncation or direct summation where an answer is needed. Adding terms may worsen the estimate; apparent convergence may be pre-asymptotic; a target may lie beyond a convergence disk or across a singular boundary; or effects invisible at every ordinary perturbative order may control the residual. The analyst must recover only the information the sequence supports without confusing a representation-dependent continuation with an exact global solution."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact method starts with a solvable baseline and generates successive correction terms in a small parameter.", "role_mapping": "Baseline -> unperturbed problem; usable terms -> perturbative coefficients.", "slug": "perturbation_theory", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The cross-domain prime likewise requires a tractable core model plus parameterized incremental corrections.", "role_mapping": "Core construction -> baseline; terms -> refinement series.", "slug": "progressive_refinement_from_core_model", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b056_a14_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A tractable local construction produces coefficients, correction terms, moments, or samples that are informative near a reference regime but cannot be used reliably by naive truncation or direct summation where an answer is needed. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A baseline-plus-correction or local-series construction exists and has produced several usable terms.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A baseline-plus-correction or local-series construction exists and has produced several usable terms.", "A tractable local construction produces coefficients, correction terms, moments, or samples that are informative near a reference regime but cannot be used reliably by naive truncation or direct summation where an answer is needed."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Perturbation Theory", "one_liner": "A technique for handling an intractable problem by splitting it into an exactly solvable baseline plus a small correction, then expanding the quantities of interest as a power series in that small parameter.", "page_ref": "prime:perturbation_theory", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Baseline -> unperturbed problem; usable terms -> perturbative coefficients.", "slug": "perturbation_theory", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact method starts with a solvable baseline and generates successive correction terms in a small parameter."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Progressive Refinement from Core Model", "one_liner": "Incremental refinement.", "page_ref": "prime:progressive_refinement_from_core_model", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Core construction -> baseline; terms -> refinement series.", "slug": "progressive_refinement_from_core_model", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The cross-domain prime likewise requires a tractable core model plus parameterized incremental corrections."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A baseline-plus-correction or local-series construction exists and has produced several usable terms.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Some perturbative expansions converge adequately in their working regime and show no such failure.", "slug": "perturbation_theory"}], "residual_id": "r:resummation_and_nonperturbative_extrapolation:b056_a14_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b056_a14_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The useful question is then not whether the infinite series converges, but how much information is recoverable at optimal truncation and whether a transform can organize the late-order behavior. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Direct partial sums converge too slowly, oscillate, diverge, or show an optimal truncation point.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Direct partial sums converge too slowly, oscillate, diverge, or show an optimal truncation point.", "The useful question is then not whether the infinite series converges, but how much information is recoverable at optimal truncation and whether a transform can organize the late-order behavior."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Some perturbative expansions converge adequately in their working regime and show no such failure.", "slug": "perturbation_theory"}], "normalized_requirement": "Direct partial sums converge too slowly, oscillate, diverge, or show an optimal truncation point.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Direct partial sums converge too slowly, oscillate, diverge, or show an optimal truncation point.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P094-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve target-to-regime proximity.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A target lies near a particular operating or analytic regime.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must concern a local representation rather than an unrelated global model.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The representation under consideration is local to that regime or neighborhood.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must link the relevant regime to degradation of the local representation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The local representation degrades in the regime near the target.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "The target lies near a regime in which the local representation degrades.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "target is near a regime of local-representation degradation", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P094-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Perturbation theory may be used safely at weak coupling far from singular boundaries.", "slug": "perturbation_theory"}], "residual_id": "r:resummation_and_nonperturbative_extrapolation:b056_a14_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b056_a14_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use the pattern near strong-coupling, critical, low-temperature, boundary-layer, or long-time regimes when a weak or local-regime description remains the best available analytical source. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The target lies near a strong-coupling, low-temperature, critical, boundary-layer, or other regime where the local representation degrades.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The target lies near a strong-coupling, low-temperature, critical, boundary-layer, or other regime where the local representation degrades.", "Use the pattern near strong-coupling, critical, low-temperature, boundary-layer, or long-time regimes when a weak or local-regime description remains the best available analytical source."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Perturbation theory may be used safely at weak coupling far from singular boundaries.", "slug": "perturbation_theory"}], "normalized_requirement": "The target lies near a strong-coupling, low-temperature, critical, boundary-layer, or other regime where the local representation degrades.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The target lies near a strong-coupling, low-temperature, critical, boundary-layer, or other regime where the local representation degrades.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Known symmetries, conservation laws, exact limits, positivity conditions, singularity locations, or benchmark cases can constrain continuation.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The case becomes stronger when coefficient signs, ratios, growth, or order dependence display a recognizable pattern and when exact limits, symmetry, dimensional scaling, positivity, or independent numerical cases can constrain the admissible reconstructions. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: Known symmetries, conservation laws, exact limits, positivity conditions, singularity locations, or benchmark cases can constrain continuation. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Known symmetries, conservation laws, exact limits, positivity conditions, singularity locations, or benchmark cases can constrain continuation.", "The case becomes stronger when coefficient signs, ratios, growth, or order dependence display a recognizable pattern and when exact limits, symmetry, dimensional scaling, positivity, or independent numerical cases can constrain the admissible reconstructions."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Known symmetries, conservation laws, exact limits, positivity conditions, singularity locations, or benchmark cases can constrain continuation."}, {"display_text": "A useful qualified estimate is possible before an exact or fully nonperturbative solution is available.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A qualified estimate may be adequate for hypothesis generation, design-space narrowing, or prioritizing a direct simulation. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: A useful qualified estimate is possible before an exact or fully nonperturbative solution is available. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A useful qualified estimate is possible before an exact or fully nonperturbative solution is available.", "A qualified estimate may be adequate for hypothesis generation, design-space narrowing, or prioritizing a direct simulation."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "A useful qualified estimate is possible before an exact or fully nonperturbative solution is available."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 56, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-056", "ledger_sha256": "eb208244c07bfc5ab3669684da9dfd03bf8283b6a0fb363b50e3aa21f90ce0ae"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Retrieval-Cued Revision", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:retrieval_cued_revision", "slug": "retrieval_cued_revision"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A durable stored pattern continues to drive behavior, interpretation, recall, or procedure even after new information or new conditions make the pattern inaccurate, unsafe, or maladaptive. Ordinary instruction fails because the old pattern is not active when the correction is delivered, or because the correction is stored beside the old response rather than incorporated into it.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A durable stored pattern continues to drive behavior, interpretation, recall, or procedure even after new information or new conditions make the pattern inaccurate, unsafe, or maladaptive. Ordinary instruction fails because the old pattern is not active when the correction is delivered, or because the correction is stored beside the old response rather than incorporated into it."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime begins with a stably stored item whose retrieval makes it active and consequential again.", "role_mapping": "Stored narrative or routine -> stable item; repeated retrieval -> reactivation.", "slug": "reconsolidation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b056_a15_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A durable stored pattern continues to drive behavior, interpretation, recall, or procedure even after new information or new conditions make the pattern inaccurate, unsafe, or maladaptive. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A stored narrative, belief, routine, association, classification, or response is repeatedly retrieved and continues to guide later behavior.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A stored narrative, belief, routine, association, classification, or response is repeatedly retrieved and continues to guide later behavior.", "A durable stored pattern continues to drive behavior, interpretation, recall, or procedure even after new information or new conditions make the pattern inaccurate, unsafe, or maladaptive."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Reconsolidation", "one_liner": "A stored item returns to a malleable state when retrieved and must be re-stored, so every retrieval is a read-modify-write and a potential edit of the original.", "page_ref": "prime:reconsolidation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Stored narrative or routine -> stable item; repeated retrieval -> reactivation.", "slug": "reconsolidation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime begins with a stably stored item whose retrieval makes it active and consequential again."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A stored narrative, belief, routine, association, classification, or response is repeatedly retrieved and continues to guide later behavior.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A stable trace that reasserts when cued is the stored-item plus reactivation relation required by reconsolidation.", "role_mapping": "Stable pattern -> stored item; cue -> retrieval.", "slug": "reconsolidation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b056_a15_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A durable stored pattern continues to drive behavior, interpretation, recall, or procedure even after new information or new conditions make the pattern inaccurate, unsafe, or maladaptive. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The target pattern is not merely missing information; it is a stable trace, habit, interpretation, or record that reasserts itself when cued.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The target pattern is not merely missing information; it is a stable trace, habit, interpretation, or record that reasserts itself when cued.", "A durable stored pattern continues to drive behavior, interpretation, recall, or procedure even after new information or new conditions make the pattern inaccurate, unsafe, or maladaptive."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Reconsolidation", "one_liner": "A stored item returns to a malleable state when retrieved and must be re-stored, so every retrieval is a read-modify-write and a potential edit of the original.", "page_ref": "prime:reconsolidation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Stable pattern -> stored item; cue -> retrieval.", "slug": "reconsolidation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A stable trace that reasserts when cued is the stored-item plus reactivation relation required by reconsolidation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The target pattern is not merely missing information; it is a stable trace, habit, interpretation, or record that reasserts itself when cued.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Retrieval, rehearsal, use, or recall is the recognizable event that opens the malleable interval.", "role_mapping": "Activation moment -> reactivation event; interval -> malleable window.", "slug": "reconsolidation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b056_a15_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The system has a recognizable activation moment: recall, rehearsal, use, simulation, incident review, case discussion, or live lookup. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The system has a recognizable activation moment: recall, rehearsal, use, simulation, incident review, case discussion, or live lookup."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Reconsolidation", "one_liner": "A stored item returns to a malleable state when retrieved and must be re-stored, so every retrieval is a read-modify-write and a potential edit of the original.", "page_ref": "prime:reconsolidation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Activation moment -> reactivation event; interval -> malleable window.", "slug": "reconsolidation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Retrieval, rehearsal, use, or recall is the recognizable event that opens the malleable interval."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The system has a recognizable activation moment: recall, rehearsal, use, simulation, incident review, case discussion, or live lookup.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact window admits additions, substitutions, and contextual updates before re-storage.", "role_mapping": "Correction -> admitted modification; active pattern -> malleable item.", "slug": "reconsolidation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b056_a15_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Ordinary instruction fails because the old pattern is not active when the correction is delivered, or because the correction is stored beside the old response rather than incorporated into it. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A correction, alternative association, safer response, or updated context can be introduced while the target pattern is active.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A correction, alternative association, safer response, or updated context can be introduced while the target pattern is active.", "Ordinary instruction fails because the old pattern is not active when the correction is delivered, or because the correction is stored beside the old response rather than incorporated into it."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Reconsolidation", "one_liner": "A stored item returns to a malleable state when retrieved and must be re-stored, so every retrieval is a read-modify-write and a potential edit of the original.", "page_ref": "prime:reconsolidation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Correction -> admitted modification; active pattern -> malleable item.", "slug": "reconsolidation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact window admits additions, substitutions, and contextual updates before re-storage."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A correction, alternative association, safer response, or updated context can be introduced while the target pattern is active.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "There is enough control over timing, context, safety, and repetition to support re-storage rather than confusion or reinforcement of the old pattern.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Ordinary instruction fails because the old pattern is not active when the correction is delivered, or because the correction is stored beside the old response rather than incorporated into it. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: There is enough control over timing, context, safety, and repetition to support re-storage rather than confusion or reinforcement of the old pattern. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["There is enough control over timing, context, safety, and repetition to support re-storage rather than confusion or reinforcement of the old pattern.", "Ordinary instruction fails because the old pattern is not active when the correction is delivered, or because the correction is stored beside the old response rather than incorporated into it."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "There is enough control over timing, context, safety, and repetition to support re-storage rather than confusion or reinforcement of the old pattern."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 56, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-056", "ledger_sha256": "eb208244c07bfc5ab3669684da9dfd03bf8283b6a0fb363b50e3aa21f90ce0ae"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Retrieval-Spaced Reinforcement", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:retrieval_spaced_reinforcement", "slug": "retrieval_spaced_reinforcement"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 3 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is delayed unavailability. A person or group has encountered the material, but later cannot produce it when needed. Immediate recognition and short-term fluency create a false sense of durability. Over time, memory decays unevenly: some items remain stable, some become fragile, and some become obsolete.\n\nThe system therefore faces an allocation problem. Reviewing everything constantly is wasteful and annoying; reviewing too late permits forgetting; passive review can feel productive while failing to build recall. Retrieval-Spaced Reinforcement solves this by turning forgetting into a measurable signal and using that signal to schedule the next reinforcement.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Learners, workers, or teams initially understand or can perform something, but later cannot retrieve it reliably because review is absent, massed, passive, poorly timed, or disconnected from use."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime is explicitly designed to preserve encoded items beyond initial learning through interval-based retrieval.", "role_mapping": "Target knowledge -> encoded item; durable availability -> retention objective.", "slug": "spaced_repetition", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b057_a01_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The system needs knowledge to remain available over time, but attention is scarce and forgetting is uneven. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The target knowledge or procedure must remain available beyond the initial teaching, briefing, meeting, or training event.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The target knowledge or procedure must remain available beyond the initial teaching, briefing, meeting, or training event.", "The system needs knowledge to remain available over time, but attention is scarce and forgetting is uneven."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Spaced Repetition", "one_liner": "Reinforce over intervals.", "page_ref": "prime:spaced_repetition", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Target knowledge -> encoded item; durable availability -> retention objective.", "slug": "spaced_repetition", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime is explicitly designed to preserve encoded items beyond initial learning through interval-based retrieval."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The target knowledge or procedure must remain available beyond the initial teaching, briefing, meeting, or training event.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The technique can be selected prospectively without a failed one-time event.", "slug": "spaced_repetition"}], "residual_id": "r:retrieval_spaced_reinforcement:b057_a01_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b057_a01_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when real use is delayed or rare, when forgotten knowledge creates safety or quality risk, when a training event creates temporary familiarity but not durable recall, or when broad refresher training wastes time because only some items have actually decayed. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A one-time assessment, workshop, onboarding module, or announcement creates temporary familiarity but not durable recall.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A one-time assessment, workshop, onboarding module, or announcement creates temporary familiarity but not durable recall.", "It is especially useful when real use is delayed or rare, when forgotten knowledge creates safety or quality risk, when a training event creates temporary familiarity but not durable recall, or when broad refresher training wastes time because only some items have actually decayed."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The technique can be selected prospectively without a failed one-time event.", "slug": "spaced_repetition"}], "normalized_requirement": "A one-time assessment, workshop, onboarding module, or announcement creates temporary familiarity but not durable recall.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A one-time assessment, workshop, onboarding module, or announcement creates temporary familiarity but not durable recall.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A learner can use spaced repetition for one item and need not face a prioritization burden.", "slug": "spaced_repetition"}], "residual_id": "r:retrieval_spaced_reinforcement:b057_a01_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b057_a01_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The population has many items to retain, making continuous rehearsal too costly and unprioritized review too unreliable. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The population has many items to retain, making continuous rehearsal too costly and unprioritized review too unreliable."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A learner can use spaced repetition for one item and need not face a prioritization burden.", "slug": "spaced_repetition"}], "normalized_requirement": "The population has many items to retain, making continuous rehearsal too costly and unprioritized review too unreliable.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The population has many items to retain, making continuous rehearsal too costly and unprioritized review too unreliable.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The interval between learning and real use is long, irregular, or unpredictable.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The interval between learning and real use is long, irregular, or unpredictable. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The interval between learning and real use is long, irregular, or unpredictable."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "The interval between learning and real use is long, irregular, or unpredictable."}, {"display_text": "Forgetting creates safety, compliance, quality, customer, operational, or performance risk.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when real use is delayed or rare, when forgotten knowledge creates safety or quality risk, when a training event creates temporary familiarity but not durable recall, or when broad refresher training wastes time because only some items have actually decayed. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Forgetting creates safety, compliance, quality, customer, operational, or performance risk. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Forgetting creates safety, compliance, quality, customer, operational, or performance risk.", "It is especially useful when real use is delayed or rare, when forgotten knowledge creates safety or quality risk, when a training event creates temporary familiarity but not durable recall, or when broad refresher training wastes time because only some items have actually decayed."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Forgetting creates safety, compliance, quality, customer, operational, or performance risk."}, {"display_text": "The organization needs to detect which knowledge is stable, fragile, stale, or overdue for repair.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Over time, memory decays unevenly: some items remain stable, some become fragile, and some become obsolete. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: The organization needs to detect which knowledge is stable, fragile, stale, or overdue for repair. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The organization needs to detect which knowledge is stable, fragile, stale, or overdue for repair.", "Over time, memory decays unevenly: some items remain stable, some become fragile, and some become obsolete."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The organization needs to detect which knowledge is stable, fragile, stale, or overdue for repair."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 57, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-057", "ledger_sha256": "5d88b290aa565a99bf0a2d5bc997f56939e8812d16490a21ed971d14df8e8b3a"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Return-Path Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:return_path_design", "slug": "return_path_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system provides a clear way to enter, advance, submit, purchase, escalate, commit, or transform, but lacks an equally legible and governed way to reverse, revise, return, cancel, appeal, repair, de-escalate, or exit. The forward path becomes the only designed path, so backward movement is handled by improvisation, individual discretion, hidden exceptions, workarounds, or forced continuation.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system provides a clear way to enter, advance, submit, purchase, escalate, commit, or transform, but lacks an equally legible and governed way to reverse, revise, return, cancel, appeal, repair, de-escalate, or exit. The forward path becomes the only designed path, so backward movement is handled by improvisation, individual discretion, hidden exceptions, workarounds, or forced continuation."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime requires a directional forward pipeline carrying users or items toward commitment.", "role_mapping": "Directional process -> forward channel; completion -> commitment act.", "slug": "return_path", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b057_a02_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The forward path becomes the only designed path, so backward movement is handled by improvisation, individual discretion, hidden exceptions, workarounds, or forced continuation. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A process has a directional forward path: intake to completion, source to receiver, application to approval, purchase to fulfillment, draft to publication, triage to treatment, deployment to production, or escalation to higher authority.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A process has a directional forward path: intake to completion, source to receiver, application to approval, purchase to fulfillment, draft to publication, triage to treatment, deployment to production, or escalation to higher authority.", "The forward path becomes the only designed path, so backward movement is handled by improvisation, individual discretion, hidden exceptions, workarounds, or forced continuation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Return Path", "one_liner": "Every forward-flow pipeline serving goal-directed users requires a separately-designed backward channel whose optimisation criteria invert the forward channel's.", "page_ref": "prime:return_path", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Directional process -> forward channel; completion -> commitment act.", "slug": "return_path", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime requires a directional forward pipeline carrying users or items toward commitment."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A process has a directional forward path: intake to completion, source to receiver, application to approval, purchase to fulfillment, draft to publication, triage to treatment, deployment to production, or escalation to higher authority.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A reversal trigger such as error, regret, defect, withdrawal, or new evidence is mandatory.", "role_mapping": "Mistake or withdrawal -> reversal trigger.", "slug": "return_path", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b057_a02_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Participants can make mistakes, receive unsuitable outcomes, discover new evidence, experience changing constraints, or need to withdraw without destroying the larger system. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Participants can make mistakes, receive unsuitable outcomes, discover new evidence, experience changing constraints, or need to withdraw without destroying the larger system."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Return Path", "one_liner": "Every forward-flow pipeline serving goal-directed users requires a separately-designed backward channel whose optimisation criteria invert the forward channel's.", "page_ref": "prime:return_path", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Mistake or withdrawal -> reversal trigger.", "slug": "return_path", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A reversal trigger such as error, regret, defect, withdrawal, or new evidence is mandatory."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Participants can make mistakes, receive unsuitable outcomes, discover new evidence, experience changing constraints, or need to withdraw without destroying the larger system.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a commitment that changes system state and a backward channel that restores a prior consistent state.", "role_mapping": "Changed custody or rights -> committed state; correction -> restoration.", "slug": "return_path", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b057_a02_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Backward paths require friction of a different kind: verification, diagnosis, traceability, consent, custody, restoration, and fair closure. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Forward progress changes state, custody, eligibility, obligation, money, material location, data lineage, reputation, authority, or access in ways that require governed reversal or correction.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Forward progress changes state, custody, eligibility, obligation, money, material location, data lineage, reputation, authority, or access in ways that require governed reversal or correction.", "Backward paths require friction of a different kind: verification, diagnosis, traceability, consent, custody, restoration, and fair closure."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Return Path", "one_liner": "Every forward-flow pipeline serving goal-directed users requires a separately-designed backward channel whose optimisation criteria invert the forward channel's.", "page_ref": "prime:return_path", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Changed custody or rights -> committed state; correction -> restoration.", "slug": "return_path", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a commitment that changes system state and a backward channel that restores a prior consistent state."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Forward progress changes state, custody, eligibility, obligation, money, material location, data lineage, reputation, authority, or access in ways that require governed reversal or correction.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A mature return-path configuration has a funded explicit backward channel and need not exhibit neglect.", "slug": "return_path"}], "residual_id": "r:return_path_design:b057_a02_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b057_a02_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The forward path becomes the only designed path, so backward movement is handled by improvisation, individual discretion, hidden exceptions, workarounds, or forced continuation. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The forward path has been optimized for speed, conversion, throughput, compliance, or queue clearing, while the backward path has been left informal, hidden, under-resourced, or punitive.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The forward path has been optimized for speed, conversion, throughput, compliance, or queue clearing, while the backward path has been left informal, hidden, under-resourced, or punitive.", "The forward path becomes the only designed path, so backward movement is handled by improvisation, individual discretion, hidden exceptions, workarounds, or forced continuation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A mature return-path configuration has a funded explicit backward channel and need not exhibit neglect.", "slug": "return_path"}], "normalized_requirement": "The forward path has been optimized for speed, conversion, throughput, compliance, or queue clearing, while the backward path has been left informal, hidden, under-resourced, or punitive.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The forward path has been optimized for speed, conversion, throughput, compliance, or queue clearing, while the backward path has been left informal, hidden, under-resourced, or punitive.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A legitimate return path would reduce stuck states, shadow labor, abandonment, disputes, unsafe continuation, data corruption, or unfair finality.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The design challenge is to preserve legitimate reversibility without turning the return channel into an abuse path, a dark-pattern trap, or an unbounded operational sink. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: A legitimate return path would reduce stuck states, shadow labor, abandonment, disputes, unsafe continuation, data corruption, or unfair finality. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A legitimate return path would reduce stuck states, shadow labor, abandonment, disputes, unsafe continuation, data corruption, or unfair finality.", "The design challenge is to preserve legitimate reversibility without turning the return channel into an abuse path, a dark-pattern trap, or an unbounded operational sink."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "A legitimate return path would reduce stuck states, shadow labor, abandonment, disputes, unsafe continuation, data corruption, or unfair finality."}, {"display_text": "Some backward movement can be allowed without violating safety, law, privacy, evidence preservation, or legitimate finality constraints.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The forward path becomes the only designed path, so backward movement is handled by improvisation, individual discretion, hidden exceptions, workarounds, or forced continuation. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: Some backward movement can be allowed without violating safety, law, privacy, evidence preservation, or legitimate finality constraints. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Some backward movement can be allowed without violating safety, law, privacy, evidence preservation, or legitimate finality constraints.", "The forward path becomes the only designed path, so backward movement is handled by improvisation, individual discretion, hidden exceptions, workarounds, or forced continuation."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Some backward movement can be allowed without violating safety, law, privacy, evidence preservation, or legitimate finality constraints."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 57, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-057", "ledger_sha256": "5d88b290aa565a99bf0a2d5bc997f56939e8812d16490a21ed971d14df8e8b3a"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Reusable Pattern Application", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:reusable_pattern_application", "slug": "reusable_pattern_application"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 3 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Reusable knowledge sits at two failure-prone extremes. Reinvention discards accumulated learning, repeats known mistakes, and consumes scarce design capacity. Cargo-cult reuse copies artifacts, vocabulary, or ceremonies detached from the structural problem and intervention mechanism. Both failures arise because retrieval, fit, adaptation, instantiation, and validation are treated as one informal leap.\n\nContext matters, but not every difference justifies abandoning a pattern. Some features are conventional surface form; others alter causal forces, constraints, or failure risks. Without an invariant core, teams cannot know what must survive. Without adaptation trace, they cannot learn whether a departure was deliberate. Without local validation and an exit path, reference authority becomes lock-in. Without feedback, pattern libraries fossilize and each application repeats the same boundary work.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A mature pattern may transfer to a different context, but uncontrolled copying or adaptation can destroy the invariant structure that made it work."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "This branch preserves the complete remedy-free diagnostic route; goals, feasibility clauses, gates, deployment constraints, and supporting context remain outside the DNF."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "EXT001-C084", "dnf": [["EXT001-U084-O1"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"obligation_id": "EXT001-U084-O1", "predicate": "A mature solution pattern has been retrieved for possible application."}], "predicate": "A mature solution pattern has been retrieved for possible application.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A mature solution pattern has been retrieved for possible application.", "unit_id": "EXT001-U084"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"catalog_exhaustion": "CONDITION_LEVEL", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: A mature solution pattern has been retrieved for possible application.", "slug": "design_patterns"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: A mature solution pattern has been retrieved for possible application.", "slug": "divergence_convergence_in_the_design_process"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: A mature solution pattern has been retrieved for possible application.", "slug": "dynamic_programming"}], "residual_id": "EXT001:reusable_pattern_application:C01", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding."}}, "condition_id": "ext001_reusable_pattern_application_a01", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored structural_problem, prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: A mature solution pattern has been retrieved for possible application.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A mature solution pattern has been retrieved for possible application."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: A mature solution pattern has been retrieved for possible application.", "slug": "design_patterns"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: A mature solution pattern has been retrieved for possible application.", "slug": "divergence_convergence_in_the_design_process"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: A mature solution pattern has been retrieved for possible application.", "slug": "dynamic_programming"}], "normalized_requirement": "A mature solution pattern has been retrieved for possible application.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A mature solution pattern has been retrieved for possible application.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Transfer of learning necessarily applies source-domain mastery in a target task or context with different surface features or demands, which entails a source-to-target context difference.", "role_mapping": "The training context maps to reference contexts; the transfer target maps to the target context.", "slug": "transfer_of_learning", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "ext001_reusable_pattern_application_a02", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored structural_problem, prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: The target context differs from the reference contexts in scale, law, users, capability, culture, incentives, interfaces, or risk.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The target context differs from the reference contexts in scale, law, users, capability, culture, incentives, interfaces, or risk."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Transfer of Learning", "one_liner": "Apply knowledge across contexts.", "page_ref": "prime:transfer_of_learning", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "The training context maps to reference contexts; the transfer target maps to the target context.", "slug": "transfer_of_learning", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Transfer of learning necessarily applies source-domain mastery in a target task or context with different surface features or demands, which entails a source-to-target context difference."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The target context differs from the reference contexts in scale, law, users, capability, culture, incentives, interfaces, or risk.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "EXT001-C085", "dnf": [["EXT001-U085-O1"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"obligation_id": "EXT001-U085-O1", "predicate": "It is unclear which features are invariant and which are adaptable without causing negative transfer."}], "predicate": "It is unclear which features are invariant and which are adaptable without causing negative transfer.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "It is unclear which features are invariant and which are adaptable without causing negative transfer.", "unit_id": "EXT001-U085"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"catalog_exhaustion": "CONDITION_LEVEL", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: It is unclear which features are invariant and which are adaptable without causing negative transfer.", "slug": "feature_engineering"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: It is unclear which features are invariant and which are adaptable without causing negative transfer.", "slug": "theme_and_variation"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: It is unclear which features are invariant and which are adaptable without causing negative transfer.", "slug": "invariance"}], "residual_id": "EXT001:reusable_pattern_application:C03", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding."}}, "condition_id": "ext001_reusable_pattern_application_a03", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored structural_problem, prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: It is unclear which features are invariant and which are adaptable without causing negative transfer.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["It is unclear which features are invariant and which are adaptable without causing negative transfer."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: It is unclear which features are invariant and which are adaptable without causing negative transfer.", "slug": "feature_engineering"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: It is unclear which features are invariant and which are adaptable without causing negative transfer.", "slug": "theme_and_variation"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: It is unclear which features are invariant and which are adaptable without causing negative transfer.", "slug": "invariance"}], "normalized_requirement": "It is unclear which features are invariant and which are adaptable without causing negative transfer.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "It is unclear which features are invariant and which are adaptable without causing negative transfer.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A false transfer or rigid copy would impose material cost.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored structural_problem, prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: A false transfer or rigid copy would impose material cost. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A false transfer or rigid copy would impose material cost.", "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored structural_problem, prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "A false transfer or rigid copy would impose material cost."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"candidate_ledger_sha256": "96f72d2139077fd57bf795048ebef33b3fd574b20963170080ec916b5b3b92fe", "extension_id": "new-archetypes-extension-001", "ledger_id": "prime-production-v1.2-extension-001", "ledger_sha256": "9644520614744632d1d36da44b1acd77ce432852c6083eb871203521c166efce"}, "base_projection_sha256": "841e0c7f3cb8e8054475ad29a8a14745a416b4fc115559a44878b94292e673ec", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "ca09ed9fe1598ce7072755b530de5553f5ee0a7cd64ae82d9e4a4e2149a37788", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Revealed Preference Validation Against Indifference Curves", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:revealed_preference_validation_against_indifference_curves", "slug": "revealed_preference_validation_against_indifference_curves"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system must reason about preferences, trade-offs, or utility contours, but stated preferences, assumed indifference curves, or model-implied trade-offs may not match the choices people actually make under constraint.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system must reason about preferences, trade-offs, or utility contours, but stated preferences, assumed indifference curves, or model-implied trade-offs may not match the choices people actually make under constraint."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime requires aligned stated and enacted preference estimates that systematically diverge under a shared comparison frame.", "role_mapping": "Claimed ratio -> stated estimate; observed substitution -> revealed estimate.", "slug": "stated_revealed_preference_gap", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b057_a03_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A decision maker claims to value two goods, goals, benefits, risks, or outcomes in a certain ratio, but observed choices may reveal different substitution rates. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A decision maker claims to value two goods, goals, benefits, risks, or outcomes in a certain ratio, but observed choices may reveal different substitution rates."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Stated–Revealed Preference Gap", "one_liner": "A reported preference and behavior under a real choice opportunity systematically diverge, so the mismatch must be analyzed as two differently distorted access channels rather than automatically treating either as the agent's true valuation.", "page_ref": "prime:stated_revealed_preference_gap", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Claimed ratio -> stated estimate; observed substitution -> revealed estimate.", "slug": "stated_revealed_preference_gap", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime requires aligned stated and enacted preference estimates that systematically diverge under a shared comparison frame."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A decision maker claims to value two goods, goals, benefits, risks, or outcomes in a certain ratio, but observed choices may reveal different substitution rates.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The two channels may agree, while the gap prime specifically requires divergence.", "slug": "stated_revealed_preference_gap"}], "residual_id": "r:revealed_preference_validation_against_indifference_curves:b057_a03_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b057_a03_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system must reason about preferences, trade-offs, or utility contours, but stated preferences, assumed indifference curves, or model-implied trade-offs may not match the choices people actually make under constraint. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A team has survey or stated-preference data but also has behavioral records that may validate or contradict it.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A team has survey or stated-preference data but also has behavioral records that may validate or contradict it.", "A system must reason about preferences, trade-offs, or utility contours, but stated preferences, assumed indifference curves, or model-implied trade-offs may not match the choices people actually make under constraint."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The two channels may agree, while the gap prime specifically requires divergence.", "slug": "stated_revealed_preference_gap"}], "normalized_requirement": "A team has survey or stated-preference data but also has behavioral records that may validate or contradict it.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A team has survey or stated-preference data but also has behavioral records that may validate or contradict it.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact inference requires choice records across varying menus or constraints to recover a preference ordering.", "role_mapping": "Repeated constrained choices -> choice trace; varying budgets -> menus.", "slug": "revealed_preference", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b057_a03_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Preferences are internal and context-sensitive, while the available evidence is external behavior shaped by budgets, prices, defaults, information, habits, social pressure, and constraints. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The same actor makes repeated choices under different price, budget, risk, or bundle conditions.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The same actor makes repeated choices under different price, budget, risk, or bundle conditions.", "Preferences are internal and context-sensitive, while the available evidence is external behavior shaped by budgets, prices, defaults, information, habits, social pressure, and constraints."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Revealed Preference", "one_liner": "Infer latent value from observed choices rather than stated reports.", "page_ref": "prime:revealed_preference", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Repeated constrained choices -> choice trace; varying budgets -> menus.", "slug": "revealed_preference", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact inference requires choice records across varying menus or constraints to recover a preference ordering."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The same actor makes repeated choices under different price, budget, risk, or bundle conditions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Revealed choices may satisfy consistency and yield a stable rationalizing preference.", "slug": "revealed_preference"}], "residual_id": "r:revealed_preference_validation_against_indifference_curves:b057_a03_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b057_a03_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Observed selections appear inconsistent, dominated, cyclic, path-dependent, or sensitive to framing. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Observed selections appear inconsistent, dominated, cyclic, path-dependent, or sensitive to framing."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Revealed choices may satisfy consistency and yield a stable rationalizing preference.", "slug": "revealed_preference"}], "normalized_requirement": "Observed selections appear inconsistent, dominated, cyclic, path-dependent, or sensitive to framing.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Observed selections appear inconsistent, dominated, cyclic, path-dependent, or sensitive to framing.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A product, policy, compensation, or conservation decision depends on estimating trade-offs that cannot be observed directly.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system must reason about preferences, trade-offs, or utility contours, but stated preferences, assumed indifference curves, or model-implied trade-offs may not match the choices people actually make under constraint. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: A product, policy, compensation, or conservation decision depends on estimating trade-offs that cannot be observed directly. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A product, policy, compensation, or conservation decision depends on estimating trade-offs that cannot be observed directly.", "A system must reason about preferences, trade-offs, or utility contours, but stated preferences, assumed indifference curves, or model-implied trade-offs may not match the choices people actually make under constraint."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "A product, policy, compensation, or conservation decision depends on estimating trade-offs that cannot be observed directly."}, {"display_text": "The project needs to distinguish stable preference from noise, manipulation, constraint artifacts, habit, or limited attention.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Preferences are internal and context-sensitive, while the available evidence is external behavior shaped by budgets, prices, defaults, information, habits, social pressure, and constraints. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: The project needs to distinguish stable preference from noise, manipulation, constraint artifacts, habit, or limited attention. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The project needs to distinguish stable preference from noise, manipulation, constraint artifacts, habit, or limited attention.", "Preferences are internal and context-sensitive, while the available evidence is external behavior shaped by budgets, prices, defaults, information, habits, social pressure, and constraints."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The project needs to distinguish stable preference from noise, manipulation, constraint artifacts, habit, or limited attention."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 57, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-057", "ledger_sha256": "5d88b290aa565a99bf0a2d5bc997f56939e8812d16490a21ed971d14df8e8b3a"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Revealed-Use Path Alignment", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:revealed_use_path_alignment", "slug": "revealed_use_path_alignment"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The official path through a system reflects designer assumptions, institutional convenience, or legacy layout, while actual users discover a lower-cost or more meaningful path through repeated use. Because the trace is informal, the organization may dismiss it as misuse, repeatedly repair the substrate, punish the users, or over-formalize the wrong behavior without understanding what the trace means.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "The official path through a system reflects designer assumptions, institutional convenience, or legacy layout, while actual users discover a lower-cost or more meaningful path through repeated use. Because the trace is informal, the organization may dismiss it as misuse, repeatedly repair the substrate, punish the users, or over-formalize the wrong behavior without understanding what the trace means."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime begins with a prescribed routing or affordance.", "role_mapping": "Intended route -> prescribed affordance.", "slug": "desire_path", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b057_a04_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The design wants users to move through a legible, controllable, governable path; users want to satisfy situated goals with the least meaningful cost. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A system has an intended route, workflow, navigation, queue, form, process, policy, or spatial path that users are expected to follow.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A system has an intended route, workflow, navigation, queue, form, process, policy, or spatial path that users are expected to follow.", "The design wants users to move through a legible, controllable, governable path; users want to satisfy situated goals with the least meaningful cost."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Desire Path", "one_liner": "An involuntary trace worn into a designed environment's substrate by repeated use, recording revealed preference where the design fails to accommodate it.", "page_ref": "prime:desire_path", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Intended route -> prescribed affordance.", "slug": "desire_path", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime begins with a prescribed routing or affordance."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A system has an intended route, workflow, navigation, queue, form, process, policy, or spatial path that users are expected to follow.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Repeated independent divergence inscribed in wear, logs, or tickets is the defining desire-path trace.", "role_mapping": "User divergence -> enacted route; records -> inscribing substrate.", "slug": "desire_path", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b057_a04_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The official path through a system reflects designer assumptions, institutional convenience, or legacy layout, while actual users discover a lower-cost or more meaningful path through repeated use. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Users repeatedly diverge from that intended path in similar ways, and the divergence leaves observable traces in material wear, operational records, analytics, communications, or repeated support demand.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Users repeatedly diverge from that intended path in similar ways, and the divergence leaves observable traces in material wear, operational records, analytics, communications, or repeated support demand.", "The official path through a system reflects designer assumptions, institutional convenience, or legacy layout, while actual users discover a lower-cost or more meaningful path through repeated use."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Desire Path", "one_liner": "An involuntary trace worn into a designed environment's substrate by repeated use, recording revealed preference where the design fails to accommodate it.", "page_ref": "prime:desire_path", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "User divergence -> enacted route; records -> inscribing substrate.", "slug": "desire_path", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Repeated independent divergence inscribed in wear, logs, or tickets is the defining desire-path trace."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Users repeatedly diverge from that intended path in similar ways, and the divergence leaves observable traces in material wear, operational records, analytics, communications, or repeated support demand.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The trace records revealed preference under real friction and therefore commonly identifies a lower-cost enacted path.", "role_mapping": "Reduced effort -> friction advantage; observed use -> revealed preference.", "slug": "desire_path", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b057_a04_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The design wants users to move through a legible, controllable, governable path; users want to satisfy situated goals with the least meaningful cost. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The deviation appears to reduce effort, time, uncertainty, distance, cognitive load, social risk, or coordination cost for at least some users.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The deviation appears to reduce effort, time, uncertainty, distance, cognitive load, social risk, or coordination cost for at least some users.", "The design wants users to move through a legible, controllable, governable path; users want to satisfy situated goals with the least meaningful cost."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Desire Path", "one_liner": "An involuntary trace worn into a designed environment's substrate by repeated use, recording revealed preference where the design fails to accommodate it.", "page_ref": "prime:desire_path", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Reduced effort -> friction advantage; observed use -> revealed preference.", "slug": "desire_path", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The trace records revealed preference under real friction and therefore commonly identifies a lower-cost enacted path."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The deviation appears to reduce effort, time, uncertainty, distance, cognitive load, social risk, or coordination cost for at least some users.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The durability criterion separates persistent signal from one-off anomaly or emergency.", "role_mapping": "Stable trace -> durable cumulative inscription.", "slug": "desire_path", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b057_a04_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The trace proves that actual behavior is already solving a different optimization problem than the design assumed, but the trace does not by itself say whether the unofficial path is safe, fair, lawful, or worth formalizing. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The trace is stable enough to distinguish a persistent design mismatch from a temporary anomaly, prank, malicious bypass, one-off emergency, or transient crowding effect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The trace is stable enough to distinguish a persistent design mismatch from a temporary anomaly, prank, malicious bypass, one-off emergency, or transient crowding effect.", "The trace proves that actual behavior is already solving a different optimization problem than the design assumed, but the trace does not by itself say whether the unofficial path is safe, fair, lawful, or worth formalizing."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Desire Path", "one_liner": "An involuntary trace worn into a designed environment's substrate by repeated use, recording revealed preference where the design fails to accommodate it.", "page_ref": "prime:desire_path", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Stable trace -> durable cumulative inscription.", "slug": "desire_path", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The durability criterion separates persistent signal from one-off anomaly or emergency."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The trace is stable enough to distinguish a persistent design mismatch from a temporary anomaly, prank, malicious bypass, one-off emergency, or transient crowding effect.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The designed path can plausibly be modified, supplemented, legitimized, guarded, or better explained.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The design wants users to move through a legible, controllable, governable path; users want to satisfy situated goals with the least meaningful cost. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: The designed path can plausibly be modified, supplemented, legitimized, guarded, or better explained. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The designed path can plausibly be modified, supplemented, legitimized, guarded, or better explained.", "The design wants users to move through a legible, controllable, governable path; users want to satisfy situated goals with the least meaningful cost."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The designed path can plausibly be modified, supplemented, legitimized, guarded, or better explained."}, {"display_text": "Ignoring or simply suppressing the trace would preserve a formally neat design while increasing friction, unsafe workarounds, contempt for rules, maintenance cost, or inequitable access.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The design wants users to move through a legible, controllable, governable path; users want to satisfy situated goals with the least meaningful cost. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Ignoring or simply suppressing the trace would preserve a formally neat design while increasing friction, unsafe workarounds, contempt for rules, maintenance cost, or inequitable access. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Ignoring or simply suppressing the trace would preserve a formally neat design while increasing friction, unsafe workarounds, contempt for rules, maintenance cost, or inequitable access.", "The design wants users to move through a legible, controllable, governable path; users want to satisfy situated goals with the least meaningful cost."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Ignoring or simply suppressing the trace would preserve a formally neat design while increasing friction, unsafe workarounds, contempt for rules, maintenance cost, or inequitable access."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 57, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-057", "ledger_sha256": "5d88b290aa565a99bf0a2d5bc997f56939e8812d16490a21ed971d14df8e8b3a"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Revenue–Accountability Coupling Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:revenue_accountability_coupling_design", "slug": "revenue_accountability_coupling_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 5, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "An agent receives durable revenue, budget, subsidy, rent, data value, attention, monopoly income, donor support, advertising money, resource income, or automatic appropriation through a channel that bypasses the principals, beneficiaries, users, citizens, contributors, or mandate holders it would otherwise need to satisfy. Because resource survival is no longer coupled to answerable performance, actual control drifts toward funders, sponsors, intermediaries, insiders, or self-preservation routines while nominal accountability remains on paper.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "An agent receives durable revenue, budget, subsidy, rent, data value, attention, monopoly income, donor support, advertising money, resource income, or automatic appropriation through a channel that bypasses the principals, beneficiaries, users, citizens, contributors, or mandate holders it would otherwise need to satisfy. Because resource survival is no longer coupled to answerable performance, actual control drifts toward funders, sponsors, intermediaries, insiders, or self-preservation routines while nominal accountability remains on paper."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime requires a function-performing agent and nominal accountability constituency.", "role_mapping": "Agent -> institution; principal -> mission constituency.", "slug": "severed_accountability_via_unearned_revenue", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b057_a05_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "An agent receives durable revenue, budget, subsidy, rent, data value, attention, monopoly income, donor support, advertising money, resource income, or automatic appropriation through a channel that bypasses the principals, beneficiaries, users, citizens, contributors, or mandate holders it would otherwise need to satisfy. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The agent has a stated principal, mission, constituency, beneficiary group, mandate, service population, or public purpose.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The agent has a stated principal, mission, constituency, beneficiary group, mandate, service population, or public purpose.", "An agent receives durable revenue, budget, subsidy, rent, data value, attention, monopoly income, donor support, advertising money, resource income, or automatic appropriation through a channel that bypasses the principals, beneficiaries, users, citizens, contributors, or mandate holders it would otherwise need to satisfy."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Severed Accountability Via Unearned Revenue", "one_liner": "When an agent's revenue arrives through a channel that bypasses the principals it would otherwise answer to, the accountability link is severed and predictable goal-drift follows.", "page_ref": "prime:severed_accountability_via_unearned_revenue", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Agent -> institution; principal -> mission constituency.", "slug": "severed_accountability_via_unearned_revenue", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime requires a function-performing agent and nominal accountability constituency."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The agent has a stated principal, mission, constituency, beneficiary group, mandate, service population, or public purpose.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A bypassing revenue channel supplied independently of the nominal principal is defining.", "role_mapping": "Different funder -> revenue tap; automatic allocation -> bypass.", "slug": "severed_accountability_via_unearned_revenue", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b057_a05_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "An agent receives durable revenue, budget, subsidy, rent, data value, attention, monopoly income, donor support, advertising money, resource income, or automatic appropriation through a channel that bypasses the principals, beneficiaries, users, citizens, contributors, or mandate holders it would otherwise need to satisfy. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The agent's revenue or operating resources are supplied by a different party, asset, rent stream, captive channel, or automatic allocation.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The agent's revenue or operating resources are supplied by a different party, asset, rent stream, captive channel, or automatic allocation.", "An agent receives durable revenue, budget, subsidy, rent, data value, attention, monopoly income, donor support, advertising money, resource income, or automatic appropriation through a channel that bypasses the principals, beneficiaries, users, citizens, contributors, or mandate holders it would otherwise need to satisfy."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Severed Accountability Via Unearned Revenue", "one_liner": "When an agent's revenue arrives through a channel that bypasses the principals it would otherwise answer to, the accountability link is severed and predictable goal-drift follows.", "page_ref": "prime:severed_accountability_via_unearned_revenue", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Different funder -> revenue tap; automatic allocation -> bypass.", "slug": "severed_accountability_via_unearned_revenue", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A bypassing revenue channel supplied independently of the nominal principal is defining."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The agent's revenue or operating resources are supplied by a different party, asset, rent stream, captive channel, or automatic allocation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The principal's exit-and-voice leverage is structurally severed from resource renewal.", "role_mapping": "Weak exit and voice -> hollow leverage.", "slug": "severed_accountability_via_unearned_revenue", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b057_a05_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "An agent receives durable revenue, budget, subsidy, rent, data value, attention, monopoly income, donor support, advertising money, resource income, or automatic appropriation through a channel that bypasses the principals, beneficiaries, users, citizens, contributors, or mandate holders it would otherwise need to satisfy. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The served principals have weak exit, weak voice, weak review power, or no practical ability to condition resource renewal.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The served principals have weak exit, weak voice, weak review power, or no practical ability to condition resource renewal.", "An agent receives durable revenue, budget, subsidy, rent, data value, attention, monopoly income, donor support, advertising money, resource income, or automatic appropriation through a channel that bypasses the principals, beneficiaries, users, citizens, contributors, or mandate holders it would otherwise need to satisfy."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Severed Accountability Via Unearned Revenue", "one_liner": "When an agent's revenue arrives through a channel that bypasses the principals it would otherwise answer to, the accountability link is severed and predictable goal-drift follows.", "page_ref": "prime:severed_accountability_via_unearned_revenue", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Weak exit and voice -> hollow leverage.", "slug": "severed_accountability_via_unearned_revenue", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The principal's exit-and-voice leverage is structurally severed from resource renewal."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The served principals have weak exit, weak voice, weak review power, or no practical ability to condition resource renewal.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The loyalty-follows-the-tap invariant makes satisfying funders easier and more survival-relevant than satisfying beneficiaries.", "role_mapping": "Funders -> revenue source; affected people -> nominal principal.", "slug": "severed_accountability_via_unearned_revenue", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b057_a05_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Because resource survival is no longer coupled to answerable performance, actual control drifts toward funders, sponsors, intermediaries, insiders, or self-preservation routines while nominal accountability remains on paper. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Budget continuation is easier to secure by satisfying funders, sponsors, regulators, intermediaries, or internal metrics than by satisfying the people affected.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Budget continuation is easier to secure by satisfying funders, sponsors, regulators, intermediaries, or internal metrics than by satisfying the people affected.", "Because resource survival is no longer coupled to answerable performance, actual control drifts toward funders, sponsors, intermediaries, insiders, or self-preservation routines while nominal accountability remains on paper."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Severed Accountability Via Unearned Revenue", "one_liner": "When an agent's revenue arrives through a channel that bypasses the principals it would otherwise answer to, the accountability link is severed and predictable goal-drift follows.", "page_ref": "prime:severed_accountability_via_unearned_revenue", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Funders -> revenue source; affected people -> nominal principal.", "slug": "severed_accountability_via_unearned_revenue", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The loyalty-follows-the-tap invariant makes satisfying funders easier and more survival-relevant than satisfying beneficiaries."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Budget continuation is easier to secure by satisfying funders, sponsors, regulators, intermediaries, or internal metrics than by satisfying the people affected.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A stable insulated stream supplies the independence from constituents that permits predictable goal drift.", "role_mapping": "Insulated resources -> bypass persistence; drift -> degradation.", "slug": "severed_accountability_via_unearned_revenue", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b057_a05_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Because resource survival is no longer coupled to answerable performance, actual control drifts toward funders, sponsors, intermediaries, insiders, or self-preservation routines while nominal accountability remains on paper. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The resource stream is large enough, stable enough, or insulated enough to support goal drift over time.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The resource stream is large enough, stable enough, or insulated enough to support goal drift over time.", "Because resource survival is no longer coupled to answerable performance, actual control drifts toward funders, sponsors, intermediaries, insiders, or self-preservation routines while nominal accountability remains on paper."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Severed Accountability Via Unearned Revenue", "one_liner": "When an agent's revenue arrives through a channel that bypasses the principals it would otherwise answer to, the accountability link is severed and predictable goal-drift follows.", "page_ref": "prime:severed_accountability_via_unearned_revenue", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Insulated resources -> bypass persistence; drift -> degradation.", "slug": "severed_accountability_via_unearned_revenue", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A stable insulated stream supplies the independence from constituents that permits predictable goal drift."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The resource stream is large enough, stable enough, or insulated enough to support goal drift over time.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Formal accountability mechanisms exist but sample only reports, compliance rituals, or nominal control surfaces rather than the actual revenue dependence.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Because resource survival is no longer coupled to answerable performance, actual control drifts toward funders, sponsors, intermediaries, insiders, or self-preservation routines while nominal accountability remains on paper. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Formal accountability mechanisms exist but sample only reports, compliance rituals, or nominal control surfaces rather than the actual revenue dependence. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Formal accountability mechanisms exist but sample only reports, compliance rituals, or nominal control surfaces rather than the actual revenue dependence.", "Because resource survival is no longer coupled to answerable performance, actual control drifts toward funders, sponsors, intermediaries, insiders, or self-preservation routines while nominal accountability remains on paper."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Formal accountability mechanisms exist but sample only reports, compliance rituals, or nominal control surfaces rather than the actual revenue dependence."}, {"display_text": "Stakeholders debate misconduct or inefficiency without first asking who the institution financially needs to satisfy in order to survive.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Stakeholders debate misconduct or inefficiency without first asking who the institution financially needs to satisfy in order to survive. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders debate misconduct or inefficiency without first asking who the institution financially needs to satisfy in order to survive."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "Stakeholders debate misconduct or inefficiency without first asking who the institution financially needs to satisfy in order to survive."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 57, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-057", "ledger_sha256": "5d88b290aa565a99bf0a2d5bc997f56939e8812d16490a21ed971d14df8e8b3a"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Reversibility-Aware Transition Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:reversibility_aware_transition_design", "slug": "reversibility_aware_transition_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Decision cases commonly label a transition “reversible” because an inverse command, backup, cancellation clause, sunset date, or removal plan exists. The label compresses several questions that may have different answers: Can the initiating operation be inverted? Can internal state be reconstructed? Can service, rights, or function be restored? Can downstream actors be recalled? Can external effects be contained? Can affected parties be made whole? Can the organization still execute the return when needed?\n\nThe missing boundary is often decisive. A database may return while emails, payments, model decisions, or contractual commitments remain in the world. A policy may expire while people have lost eligibility, moved, invested, disclosed information, or changed behavior. A reorganization may be formally reversed after staff have departed and local knowledge has dispersed. A habitat may remain degraded after equipment is removed. Technical success inside the implementer's system can coexist with irreversible outcome outside it.\n\nReturn capacity also decays. Backups age, schemas diverge, credentials expire, staff forget, suppliers disappear, contracts terminate, reserves are spent, dependent systems move on, and the acceptable recovery window narrows. A successful pilot return does not prove full-scale reversibility: volume, concurrency, coordination, physical dispersion, public reliance, and third-party action can make the same procedure too slow or incomplete.\n\nThe core tension is productive commitment versus preserved return. Staging, redundancy, artifacts, shadow operation, and rehearsal cost time and constrain optimization. Yet a fast transition backed by a fictional rollback shifts unpriced risk to affected parties. The archetype makes that trade visible before the system crosses a horizon, not after return fails.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Actors approve transitions using a binary reversible/irreversible label that ignores partial restoration, external effects, delay, scale, dependencies, data loss, rights, distribution, and the resources required to return."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Reversibility is a process property and can concern a trivial state change with no rights or material consequence.", "slug": "reversibility_and_irreversibility"}], "residual_id": "r:reversibility_aware_transition_design:b057_a06_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b057_a06_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use it when rollback, repeal, restoration, exit, cancellation, removal, or return is cited as a safeguard for a consequential transition. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A transition changes consequential state or rights.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A transition changes consequential state or rights", "Use it when rollback, repeal, restoration, exit, cancellation, removal, or return is cited as a safeguard for a consequential transition."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Reversibility is a process property and can concern a trivial state change with no rights or material consequence.", "slug": "reversibility_and_irreversibility"}], "normalized_requirement": "A transition changes consequential state or rights", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A transition changes consequential state or rights", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P094-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve an implementing system and effects associated with its implementation.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An implementing system produces or transmits effects.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail cross-boundary propagation rather than effects confined to the implementer.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The effects propagate beyond the boundary of the implementing system.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Effects propagate beyond the implementing system.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "effects cross the implementing-system boundary", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P094-C04-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A reversal horizon may be wholly internal and need not involve spillover.", "slug": "reversibility_horizon"}], "residual_id": "r:reversibility_aware_transition_design:b057_a06_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b057_a06_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Typical triggers include software and schema migrations, transactions, access or identity changes, infrastructure interventions, medical procedures, reorganizations, temporary policies, land-use changes, supplier shifts, and experiments that may propagate beyond the pilot boundary. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Effects propagate beyond the implementing system.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Effects propagate beyond the implementing system", "Typical triggers include software and schema migrations, transactions, access or identity changes, infrastructure interventions, medical procedures, reorganizations, temporary policies, land-use changes, supplier shifts, and experiments that may propagate beyond the pilot boundary."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A complete transfer-learning attack in which the upstream condition does not cross into a downstream system contradicts the defining inheritance channel.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Transfer-Learning Attack", "one_liner": "Vulnerabilities, backdoors, or poisoned representations baked into an upstream pretrained model ride intact into every downstream system built on it, because the downstream team's audit boundary encloses only its new layers while the attack surface spans the whole inherited substrate.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:transfer_learning_attack", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "transfer_learning_attack"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "transfer_learning_attack", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P094-C04-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every complete instance contains an upstream system that transmits an embedded effect across its boundary into a downstream system, directly entailing both obligations."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A complete motion-triggered-harm instance confined inside the interface and never delivered to a user would contradict involuntary exposure, which is constitutive of the DSA.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Motion-Triggered Harm", "one_liner": "The inclusive-design failure in which interface animation, autoplay, parallax, or screen flash exceeds a susceptible user's physiological tolerance — a presentation channel that doubles as a harm channel, delivering an involuntary stimulus the median-calibrated design never accounted for.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:motion_triggered_harm", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "motion_triggered_harm"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "motion_triggered_harm", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P094-C04-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record directly requires an interface presentation channel to transmit effects beyond the implemented interface to an affected user."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Effects propagate beyond the implementing system", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime is the time-dependent crossing at which reversal cost overtakes continued commitment.", "role_mapping": "Changing reversal cost -> dynamic cost curve; time -> approaching horizon.", "slug": "reversibility_horizon", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b057_a06_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use it when reversal cost or fidelity changes with time or scale; when return depends on versions, data, skills, permissions, reserves, contracts, suppliers, or external actors; when third parties can act on the forward state; or when crossing the next stage retires an option. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Reversal cost or fidelity changes over time.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Reversal cost or fidelity changes over time", "Use it when reversal cost or fidelity changes with time or scale; when return depends on versions, data, skills, permissions, reserves, contracts, suppliers, or external actors; when third parties can act on the forward state; or when crossing the next stage retires an option."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Reversibility Horizon", "one_liner": "Temporal threshold where reversal cost exceeds forward commitment.", "page_ref": "prime:reversibility_horizon", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Changing reversal cost -> dynamic cost curve; time -> approaching horizon.", "slug": "reversibility_horizon", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime is the time-dependent crossing at which reversal cost overtakes continued commitment."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Reversal cost or fidelity changes over time", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A reversible process can restore its prior state exactly and leave no irreversible residue.", "slug": "reversibility_and_irreversibility"}], "residual_id": "r:reversibility_aware_transition_design:b057_a06_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b057_a06_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Some effects cannot be restored but may be compensated or contained. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Some effects cannot be restored but may be compensated or contained"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A reversible process can restore its prior state exactly and leave no irreversible residue.", "slug": "reversibility_and_irreversibility"}], "normalized_requirement": "Some effects cannot be restored but may be compensated or contained", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Some effects cannot be restored but may be compensated or contained", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Rollback is claimed as a safeguard.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use it when rollback, repeal, restoration, exit, cancellation, removal, or return is cited as a safeguard for a consequential transition. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Rollback is claimed as a safeguard. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Rollback is claimed as a safeguard", "Use it when rollback, repeal, restoration, exit, cancellation, removal, or return is cited as a safeguard for a consequential transition."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "Rollback is claimed as a safeguard"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 57, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-057", "ledger_sha256": "5d88b290aa565a99bf0a2d5bc997f56939e8812d16490a21ed971d14df8e8b3a"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Reversibility-Horizon Detection and Commitment Gating", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:reversibility_horizon_detection_and_commitment_gating", "slug": "reversibility_horizon_detection_and_commitment_gating"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Reversibility usually erodes rather than vanishes. Each additional contract, dependency, exposure, demolition step, data overwrite, public promise, treatment dose, ecosystem disturbance, or mobilization decision changes the cost and feasibility of return. The organization sees forward progress clearly because it is tracked as delivery; return capacity is distributed across artifacts, people, rights, reserves, external actors, and environmental conditions and is rarely monitored as one declining option.\n\nObservation is delayed. Damage may be latent, ecological signals noisy, market reactions nonlinear, data loss discovered only during restore, or distributed harms reported through slow channels. Decision is delayed by analysis, sponsorship, consultation, legal review, or conflict. Execution adds mobilization, sequencing, coordination, stabilization, restoration, and verification. A gate placed at the predicted physical threshold therefore fires too late.\n\nThe horizon can be multidimensional and asymmetric. One jurisdiction may lose legal exit earlier than another. A low-resource group may face an earlier practical horizon because it cannot wait for compensation. A pilot may retain rollback while full-scale decommissioning removes staff and interoperability. A strategic actor's disclosure can provoke a response that closes de-escalation even though material deployment remains reversible.\n\nThe core tension is information gain versus maneuver time. Waiting narrows uncertainty and avoids premature exit, but waiting is itself a commitment. Early action preserves options but can sacrifice benefit and create false alarms. The archetype makes that intertemporal trade governable through scenarios, margins, signals, and authority rather than optimism or retrospective blame.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Actors continue along a path while the option to reverse silently degrades; by the time evidence is undeniable, reversal requires more cost, time, coordination, damage, or risk than moving forward."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Accumulating commitment and a rising reversal-cost curve are defining roles.", "role_mapping": "Time and commitment -> accumulating cost; reversal -> return option.", "slug": "reversibility_horizon", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b057_a07_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when reversal feasibility degrades with time, accumulated commitment, damage, dependency, legal obligation, information loss, coordination, public reliance, market or opponent response, resource depletion, or a nonlinear threshold. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Reversal cost grows with time or accumulated commitment.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Reversal cost grows with time or accumulated commitment", "Use this archetype when reversal feasibility degrades with time, accumulated commitment, damage, dependency, legal obligation, information loss, coordination, public reliance, market or opponent response, resource depletion, or a nonlinear threshold."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Reversibility Horizon", "one_liner": "Temporal threshold where reversal cost exceeds forward commitment.", "page_ref": "prime:reversibility_horizon", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Time and commitment -> accumulating cost; reversal -> return option.", "slug": "reversibility_horizon", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Accumulating commitment and a rising reversal-cost curve are defining roles."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Reversal cost grows with time or accumulated commitment", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires a temporal threshold at which the return option becomes uneconomic or infeasible.", "role_mapping": "Closing return path -> horizon crossing.", "slug": "reversibility_horizon", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b057_a07_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A gate placed at the predicted physical threshold therefore fires too late. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A physical ecological legal strategic or coordination threshold may close the return path.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A physical ecological legal strategic or coordination threshold may close the return path", "A gate placed at the predicted physical threshold therefore fires too late."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Reversibility Horizon", "one_liner": "Temporal threshold where reversal cost exceeds forward commitment.", "page_ref": "prime:reversibility_horizon", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Closing return path -> horizon crossing.", "slug": "reversibility_horizon", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires a temporal threshold at which the return option becomes uneconomic or infeasible."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A physical ecological legal strategic or coordination threshold may close the return path", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A horizon matters because effective reversal cannot occur instantaneously once cost and commitment accumulate.", "role_mapping": "Decision-to-reversal delay -> dynamic reversal cost.", "slug": "reversibility_horizon", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b057_a07_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Decision is delayed by analysis, sponsorship, consultation, legal review, or conflict. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Delay between decision and effective reversal is material.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Delay between decision and effective reversal is material", "Decision is delayed by analysis, sponsorship, consultation, legal review, or conflict."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Reversibility Horizon", "one_liner": "Temporal threshold where reversal cost exceeds forward commitment.", "page_ref": "prime:reversibility_horizon", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Decision-to-reversal delay -> dynamic reversal cost.", "slug": "reversibility_horizon", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A horizon matters because effective reversal cannot occur instantaneously once cost and commitment accumulate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Delay between decision and effective reversal is material", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact dilemma couples high early uncertainty with increasing lock-in, so waiting for evidence is itself commitment.", "role_mapping": "Forecast uncertainty -> rising information curve; waiting -> rising intervention cost.", "slug": "collingridge_dilemma", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b057_a07_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Waiting narrows uncertainty and avoids premature exit, but waiting is itself a commitment. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Forecast uncertainty is high but waiting is itself a commitment.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Forecast uncertainty is high but waiting is itself a commitment", "Waiting narrows uncertainty and avoids premature exit, but waiting is itself a commitment."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Collingridge Dilemma", "one_liner": "Information about a system's consequences rises as the cost of changing it rises, so the window where intervention is both informed and feasible may be narrow or absent.", "page_ref": "prime:collingridge_dilemma", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Forecast uncertainty -> rising information curve; waiting -> rising intervention cost.", "slug": "collingridge_dilemma", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact dilemma couples high early uncertainty with increasing lock-in, so waiting for evidence is itself commitment."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Forecast uncertainty is high but waiting is itself a commitment", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Multiple groups bear unequal reversal costs.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Multiple groups bear unequal reversal costs. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Multiple groups bear unequal reversal costs"]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Multiple groups bear unequal reversal costs"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 57, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-057", "ledger_sha256": "5d88b290aa565a99bf0a2d5bc997f56939e8812d16490a21ed971d14df8e8b3a"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Reversible Compaction for Uniform Fluid Removal", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:reversible_compaction_for_uniform_fluid_removal", "slug": "reversible_compaction_for_uniform_fluid_removal"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 2 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 2}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Geometry optimized for service is poorly conditioned for maintenance. Permanent\ndensification would destroy the primary function, while processing the open array\nleaves pockets, gradients, residue, and long cycle time.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Service geometry traps fluid or produces nonuniform removal, while permanently densifying the structure would destroy its primary function."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "This branch preserves the complete remedy-free diagnostic route; goals, feasibility clauses, gates, deployment constraints, and supporting context remain outside the DNF."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "EXT001-C086", "dnf": [["EXT001-U086-O1"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"obligation_id": "EXT001-U086-O1", "predicate": "The working geometry traps fluid, dries nonuniformly, or requires excessive removal energy."}], "predicate": "The working geometry traps fluid, dries nonuniformly, or requires excessive removal energy.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "The working geometry traps fluid, dries nonuniformly, or requires excessive removal energy.", "unit_id": "EXT001-U086"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"catalog_exhaustion": "CONDITION_LEVEL", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The working geometry traps fluid, dries nonuniformly, or requires excessive removal energy.", "slug": "escape_and_leakage"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The working geometry traps fluid, dries nonuniformly, or requires excessive removal energy.", "slug": "sequestration"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The working geometry traps fluid, dries nonuniformly, or requires excessive removal energy.", "slug": "biofouling"}], "residual_id": "EXT001:reversible_compaction_for_uniform_fluid_removal:C01", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding."}}, "condition_id": "ext001_reversible_compaction_for_uniform_fluid_removal_a01", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: The working geometry traps fluid, dries nonuniformly, or requires excessive removal energy.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The working geometry traps fluid, dries nonuniformly, or requires excessive removal energy."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The working geometry traps fluid, dries nonuniformly, or requires excessive removal energy.", "slug": "escape_and_leakage"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The working geometry traps fluid, dries nonuniformly, or requires excessive removal energy.", "slug": "sequestration"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The working geometry traps fluid, dries nonuniformly, or requires excessive removal energy.", "slug": "biofouling"}], "normalized_requirement": "The working geometry traps fluid, dries nonuniformly, or requires excessive removal energy.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The working geometry traps fluid, dries nonuniformly, or requires excessive removal energy.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "EXT001-C087", "dnf": [["EXT001-U087-O1"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"obligation_id": "EXT001-U087-O1", "predicate": "Permanent compaction would destroy the structure's primary service function."}], "predicate": "Permanent compaction would destroy the structure's primary service function.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Permanent compaction would destroy the structure's primary service function.", "unit_id": "EXT001-U087"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"catalog_exhaustion": "CONDITION_LEVEL", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Permanent compaction would destroy the structure's primary service function.", "slug": "severed_accountability_via_unearned_revenue"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Permanent compaction would destroy the structure's primary service function.", "slug": "fracture_toughness"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Permanent compaction would destroy the structure's primary service function.", "slug": "modularity"}], "residual_id": "EXT001:reversible_compaction_for_uniform_fluid_removal:C02", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding."}}, "condition_id": "ext001_reversible_compaction_for_uniform_fluid_removal_a02", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: Permanent compaction would destroy the structure's primary service function.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Permanent compaction would destroy the structure's primary service function."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Permanent compaction would destroy the structure's primary service function.", "slug": "severed_accountability_via_unearned_revenue"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Permanent compaction would destroy the structure's primary service function.", "slug": "fracture_toughness"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Permanent compaction would destroy the structure's primary service function.", "slug": "modularity"}], "normalized_requirement": "Permanent compaction would destroy the structure's primary service function.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Permanent compaction would destroy the structure's primary service function.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The elements can tolerate a bounded reversible rearrangement.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: The elements can tolerate a bounded reversible rearrangement. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The elements can tolerate a bounded reversible rearrangement.", "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "The elements can tolerate a bounded reversible rearrangement."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"candidate_ledger_sha256": "96f72d2139077fd57bf795048ebef33b3fd574b20963170080ec916b5b3b92fe", "extension_id": "new-archetypes-extension-001", "ledger_id": "prime-production-v1.2-extension-001", "ledger_sha256": "9644520614744632d1d36da44b1acd77ce432852c6083eb871203521c166efce"}, "base_projection_sha256": "841e0c7f3cb8e8054475ad29a8a14745a416b4fc115559a44878b94292e673ec", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "ca09ed9fe1598ce7072755b530de5553f5ee0a7cd64ae82d9e4a4e2149a37788", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Reversible In-Flow Phase-Separation Measurement", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:reversible_in_flow_phase_separation_measurement", "slug": "reversible_in_flow_phase_separation_measurement"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 2 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 2}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The phase property of interest is observable only after separation, while the process\ninvariant requires continuous combined flow. Inline observation of the mixture\nconfounds phases; offline sampling loses timing and changes inventory.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A phase-specific property is observable only after separation, while the process must preserve continuous combined flow."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "This branch preserves the complete remedy-free diagnostic route; goals, feasibility clauses, gates, deployment constraints, and supporting context remain outside the DNF."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "EXT001-C088", "dnf": [["EXT001-U088-O1"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"obligation_id": "EXT001-U088-O1", "predicate": "An unresolved mixture prevents reliable observation of a phase-specific property."}], "predicate": "An unresolved mixture prevents reliable observation of a phase-specific property.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "An unresolved mixture prevents reliable observation of a phase-specific property.", "unit_id": "EXT001-U088"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"catalog_exhaustion": "CONDITION_LEVEL", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: An unresolved mixture prevents reliable observation of a phase-specific property.", "slug": "criticality"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: An unresolved mixture prevents reliable observation of a phase-specific property.", "slug": "unfalsifiability"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: An unresolved mixture prevents reliable observation of a phase-specific property.", "slug": "universality"}], "residual_id": "EXT001:reversible_in_flow_phase_separation_measurement:C01", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding."}}, "condition_id": "ext001_reversible_in_flow_phase_separation_measurement_a01", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: An unresolved mixture prevents reliable observation of a phase-specific property.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["An unresolved mixture prevents reliable observation of a phase-specific property."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: An unresolved mixture prevents reliable observation of a phase-specific property.", "slug": "criticality"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: An unresolved mixture prevents reliable observation of a phase-specific property.", "slug": "unfalsifiability"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: An unresolved mixture prevents reliable observation of a phase-specific property.", "slug": "universality"}], "normalized_requirement": "An unresolved mixture prevents reliable observation of a phase-specific property.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "An unresolved mixture prevents reliable observation of a phase-specific property.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "EXT001-C089", "dnf": [["EXT001-U089-O1"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"obligation_id": "EXT001-U089-O1", "predicate": "Stopping flow or permanently separating the phases would violate a process invariant or alter state."}], "predicate": "Stopping flow or permanently separating the phases would violate a process invariant or alter state.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Stopping flow or permanently separating the phases would violate a process invariant or alter state.", "unit_id": "EXT001-U089"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"catalog_exhaustion": "CONDITION_LEVEL", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Stopping flow or permanently separating the phases would violate a process invariant or alter state.", "slug": "configuration_drift"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Stopping flow or permanently separating the phases would violate a process invariant or alter state.", "slug": "metastability"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Stopping flow or permanently separating the phases would violate a process invariant or alter state.", "slug": "swiss_cheese_model"}], "residual_id": "EXT001:reversible_in_flow_phase_separation_measurement:C02", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding."}}, "condition_id": "ext001_reversible_in_flow_phase_separation_measurement_a02", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: Stopping flow or permanently separating the phases would violate a process invariant or alter state.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Stopping flow or permanently separating the phases would violate a process invariant or alter state."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Stopping flow or permanently separating the phases would violate a process invariant or alter state.", "slug": "configuration_drift"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Stopping flow or permanently separating the phases would violate a process invariant or alter state.", "slug": "metastability"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Stopping flow or permanently separating the phases would violate a process invariant or alter state.", "slug": "swiss_cheese_model"}], "normalized_requirement": "Stopping flow or permanently separating the phases would violate a process invariant or alter state.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Stopping flow or permanently separating the phases would violate a process invariant or alter state.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The phases can be separated temporarily and recombined without unacceptable disturbance.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: The phases can be separated temporarily and recombined without unacceptable disturbance. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The phases can be separated temporarily and recombined without unacceptable disturbance.", "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "The phases can be separated temporarily and recombined without unacceptable disturbance."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"candidate_ledger_sha256": "96f72d2139077fd57bf795048ebef33b3fd574b20963170080ec916b5b3b92fe", "extension_id": "new-archetypes-extension-001", "ledger_id": "prime-production-v1.2-extension-001", "ledger_sha256": "9644520614744632d1d36da44b1acd77ce432852c6083eb871203521c166efce"}, "base_projection_sha256": "841e0c7f3cb8e8054475ad29a8a14745a416b4fc115559a44878b94292e673ec", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "ca09ed9fe1598ce7072755b530de5553f5ee0a7cd64ae82d9e4a4e2149a37788", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Reversible Operation Structure Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:reversible_operation_structure_design", "slug": "reversible_operation_structure_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system contains transformations, moves, permissions, state changes, or symbolic operations that are composed in practice, but the valid carrier set, composition rule, no-op state, inverse behavior, and invariant-preserving structure are not explicit. As a result, operation sequences are hard to simplify, undo, compare, translate, or audit.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system contains transformations, moves, permissions, state changes, or symbolic operations that are composed in practice, but the valid carrier set, composition rule, no-op state, inverse behavior, and invariant-preserving structure are not explicit. As a result, operation sequences are hard to simplify, undo, compare, translate, or audit."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Closure and associativity make repeated operation composition valid and unambiguous.", "role_mapping": "Operations -> group elements; repeated composition -> closed associative operation.", "slug": "group", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b057_a08_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "As a result, operation sequences are hard to simplify, undo, compare, translate, or audit. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Actors need to compose operations repeatedly and trust that the result remains valid.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Actors need to compose operations repeatedly and trust that the result remains valid.", "As a result, operation sequences are hard to simplify, undo, compare, translate, or audit."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Group", "one_liner": "A set with an associative operation, identity, and inverses — reversible composable transformations.", "page_ref": "prime:group", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Operations -> group elements; repeated composition -> closed associative operation.", "slug": "group", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Closure and associativity make repeated operation composition valid and unambiguous."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Actors need to compose operations repeatedly and trust that the result remains valid.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "An inverse for every element makes undo a structural guarantee.", "role_mapping": "Undo -> inverse; neutral rollback -> identity.", "slug": "group", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b057_a08_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Undo, cancellation, rollback, or reversibility is a load-bearing property rather than an afterthought. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Undo, cancellation, rollback, or reversibility is a load-bearing property rather than an afterthought."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Group", "one_liner": "A set with an associative operation, identity, and inverses — reversible composable transformations.", "page_ref": "prime:group", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Undo -> inverse; neutral rollback -> identity.", "slug": "group", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "An inverse for every element makes undo a structural guarantee."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Undo, cancellation, rollback, or reversibility is a load-bearing property rather than an afterthought.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A group already supplies an algebraic structure for proving sequence equivalence.", "slug": "group"}], "residual_id": "r:reversible_operation_structure_design:b057_a08_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b057_a08_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "As a result, operation sequences are hard to simplify, undo, compare, translate, or audit. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Different operation sequences may be equivalent, but no formal structure exists for proving equivalence.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Different operation sequences may be equivalent, but no formal structure exists for proving equivalence.", "As a result, operation sequences are hard to simplify, undo, compare, translate, or audit."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A group already supplies an algebraic structure for proving sequence equivalence.", "slug": "group"}], "normalized_requirement": "Different operation sequences may be equivalent, but no formal structure exists for proving equivalence.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Different operation sequences may be equivalent, but no formal structure exists for proving equivalence.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Groups are the algebraic object of reversible transformations and symmetry actions.", "role_mapping": "Transformations -> elements; symmetry reasoning -> group action.", "slug": "group", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b057_a08_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system contains transformations, moves, permissions, state changes, or symbolic operations that are composed in practice, but the valid carrier set, composition rule, no-op state, inverse behavior, and invariant-preserving structure are not explicit. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A domain relies on symmetry, transformation, permutation, or invariant reasoning.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A domain relies on symmetry, transformation, permutation, or invariant reasoning.", "A system contains transformations, moves, permissions, state changes, or symbolic operations that are composed in practice, but the valid carrier set, composition rule, no-op state, inverse behavior, and invariant-preserving structure are not explicit."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Group", "one_liner": "A set with an associative operation, identity, and inverses — reversible composable transformations.", "page_ref": "prime:group", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Transformations -> elements; symmetry reasoning -> group action.", "slug": "group", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Groups are the algebraic object of reversible transformations and symmetry actions."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A domain relies on symmetry, transformation, permutation, or invariant reasoning.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid group explicitly has an identity and inverses, so the condition describes its absence.", "slug": "group"}], "residual_id": "r:reversible_operation_structure_design:b057_a08_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b057_a08_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system contains transformations, moves, permissions, state changes, or symbolic operations that are composed in practice, but the valid carrier set, composition rule, no-op state, inverse behavior, and invariant-preserving structure are not explicit. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: An implementation claims to support reversible actions but lacks explicit inverse and identity semantics.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["An implementation claims to support reversible actions but lacks explicit inverse and identity semantics.", "A system contains transformations, moves, permissions, state changes, or symbolic operations that are composed in practice, but the valid carrier set, composition rule, no-op state, inverse behavior, and invariant-preserving structure are not explicit."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid group explicitly has an identity and inverses, so the condition describes its absence.", "slug": "group"}], "normalized_requirement": "An implementation claims to support reversible actions but lacks explicit inverse and identity semantics.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "An implementation claims to support reversible actions but lacks explicit inverse and identity semantics.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A small set of primitive operations is expected to generate a larger reachable space.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: A small set of primitive operations is expected to generate a larger reachable space. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A small set of primitive operations is expected to generate a larger reachable space."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "A small set of primitive operations is expected to generate a larger reachable space."}, {"display_text": "A mathematical or computational representation needs to transfer across domains without losing composition behavior.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system contains transformations, moves, permissions, state changes, or symbolic operations that are composed in practice, but the valid carrier set, composition rule, no-op state, inverse behavior, and invariant-preserving structure are not explicit. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: A mathematical or computational representation needs to transfer across domains without losing composition behavior. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A mathematical or computational representation needs to transfer across domains without losing composition behavior.", "A system contains transformations, moves, permissions, state changes, or symbolic operations that are composed in practice, but the valid carrier set, composition rule, no-op state, inverse behavior, and invariant-preserving structure are not explicit."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "A mathematical or computational representation needs to transfer across domains without losing composition behavior."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 57, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-057", "ledger_sha256": "5d88b290aa565a99bf0a2d5bc997f56939e8812d16490a21ed971d14df8e8b3a"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Revision-Readiness Precommitment", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:revision_readiness_precommitment", "slug": "revision_readiness_precommitment"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 4 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A belief, forecast, diagnosis, or strategy may need revision, but the decision-maker has not defined what evidence would be sufficient to trigger revision before incentives and emotions attach to the existing view.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A belief, forecast, diagnosis, or strategy may need revision, but the decision-maker has not defined what evidence would be sufficient to trigger revision before incentives and emotions attach to the existing view."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Value of information can be calculated for evidence acquired before any commitment.", "slug": "value_of_information"}], "residual_id": "r:revision_readiness_precommitment:b057_a09_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b057_a09_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Epistemic humility requires openness to revision, but human and institutional cognition often protects existing commitments unless the revision standard is fixed before the challenge arrives. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The relevant evidence will arrive after the current commitment is made.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The relevant evidence will arrive after the current commitment is made.", "Epistemic humility requires openness to revision, but human and institutional cognition often protects existing commitments unless the revision standard is fixed before the challenge arrives."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Value of information can be calculated for evidence acquired before any commitment.", "slug": "value_of_information"}], "normalized_requirement": "The relevant evidence will arrive after the current commitment is made.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The relevant evidence will arrive after the current commitment is made.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The condition explicitly includes the asymmetric processing of confirming over disconfirming evidence that defines confirmation bias.", "role_mapping": "Existing belief -> prior; confirmation pressure -> asymmetric processing.", "slug": "confirmation_bias", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b057_a09_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A belief, forecast, diagnosis, or strategy may need revision, but the decision-maker has not defined what evidence would be sufficient to trigger revision before incentives and emotions attach to the existing view. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The decision-maker is exposed to confirmation bias, sunk-cost pressure, identity threat, status incentives, or institutional inertia.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The decision-maker is exposed to confirmation bias, sunk-cost pressure, identity threat, status incentives, or institutional inertia.", "A belief, forecast, diagnosis, or strategy may need revision, but the decision-maker has not defined what evidence would be sufficient to trigger revision before incentives and emotions attach to the existing view."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Confirmation Bias", "one_liner": "Favor confirming evidence.", "page_ref": "prime:confirmation_bias", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Existing belief -> prior; confirmation pressure -> asymmetric processing.", "slug": "confirmation_bias", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The condition explicitly includes the asymmetric processing of confirming over disconfirming evidence that defines confirmation bias."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The decision-maker is exposed to confirmation bias, sunk-cost pressure, identity threat, status incentives, or institutional inertia.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Information may have value for choosing among actions without discriminating among beliefs.", "slug": "value_of_information"}], "residual_id": "r:revision_readiness_precommitment:b057_a09_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b057_a09_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The current belief is plausible but uncertain, and future observations can discriminate among alternatives. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The current belief is plausible but uncertain, and future observations can discriminate among alternatives."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Information may have value for choosing among actions without discriminating among beliefs.", "slug": "value_of_information"}], "normalized_requirement": "The current belief is plausible but uncertain, and future observations can discriminate among alternatives.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The current belief is plausible but uncertain, and future observations can discriminate among alternatives.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A credible commitment may be externally enforced and not concern evidence interpretation.", "slug": "credible_commitment"}], "residual_id": "r:revision_readiness_precommitment:b057_a09_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b057_a09_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A later review would otherwise be vulnerable to goalpost shifting or selective interpretation. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A later review would otherwise be vulnerable to goalpost shifting or selective interpretation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A credible commitment may be externally enforced and not concern evidence interpretation.", "slug": "credible_commitment"}], "normalized_requirement": "A later review would otherwise be vulnerable to goalpost shifting or selective interpretation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A later review would otherwise be vulnerable to goalpost shifting or selective interpretation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A claim or plan is important enough that failure to revise would be costly.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: A claim or plan is important enough that failure to revise would be costly. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A claim or plan is important enough that failure to revise would be costly."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "A claim or plan is important enough that failure to revise would be costly."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 57, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-057", "ledger_sha256": "5d88b290aa565a99bf0a2d5bc997f56939e8812d16490a21ed971d14df8e8b3a"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Rights–Freedoms Obligation Mapping", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:rights_freedoms_obligation_mapping", "slug": "rights_freedoms_obligation_mapping"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 9, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 9 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 9}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Ambiguous rights language compresses a relational system into a prestigious label. Compression is often politically and communicatively useful, but it becomes dangerous when the implementation boundary arrives. A product manager hears “right to access” and creates a permission. An operations team hears the same phrase and assumes a service-level obligation. A finance team sees no assigned capacity owner. A security team adds a revocation power. A customer expects a remedy. Each interpretation may be coherent alone, yet the combined system is contradictory.\n\nThe structural defect is deeper than unclear wording. Normative positions are relational: they distribute freedom, obligation, exposure, authority, protection, cost, and remedy among actors. Omitting one side does not remove it; it makes the distribution informal. Informal distributions usually favor parties with implementation control, information, money, status, or access to review.\n\nThe same defect appears in substantive conflict. “Balance privacy and safety” is not yet a decision frame. Which privacy claim or liberty, held by whom, against which collection or disclosure? Which safety claim, owed by whom, supported by what evidence and capacity? Who has power to change the rule? Which actors are liable to that change? What immunity or non-waivable floor limits the power? What remedy exists after error? Without these questions, balancing becomes an intuitive comparison of slogans, and the party who defines the metrics controls the result.\n\nThe archetype also addresses implementation decay. Rights and freedoms change through policy versions, technical releases, emergency rules, service closures, jurisdiction changes, reorganizations, and accumulated exceptions. A stable map needs change, transition, and reliance rules so the operational relation cannot drift while public language remains constant.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A policy, contract, platform rule, organizational mandate, or public controversy uses “right,” “freedom,” “permission,” “entitlement,” “choice,” and “duty” as if they were interchangeable. The statement omits the relation's bearer, counterparty, object, jurisdiction, conditions, costs, exceptions, or remedy. Competing actors then debate abstractions while implementing incompatible assumptions: a liberty is treated as a guaranteed service, a claim is treated as optional permission, a power is mistaken for a liberty, or one party's protected zone silently creates an unassigned duty or burden for another."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact rights-claim structure includes an identified correlative duty bearer rather than omitting it.", "slug": "rights_vs_freedoms"}], "residual_id": "r:rights_freedoms_obligation_mapping:b057_a10_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b057_a10_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "If no answer exists, the statement may name a liberty, aspiration, interest, or unfinished claim rather than an operational claim-right. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A proposal claims to protect a right or freedom without identifying the counterpart relation.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A proposal claims to protect a right or freedom without identifying the counterpart relation.", "If no answer exists, the statement may name a liberty, aspiration, interest, or unfinished claim rather than an operational claim-right."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The exact rights-claim structure includes an identified correlative duty bearer rather than omitting it.", "slug": "rights_vs_freedoms"}], "normalized_requirement": "A proposal claims to protect a right or freedom without identifying the counterpart relation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A proposal claims to protect a right or freedom without identifying the counterpart relation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime explicitly distinguishes provision from noninterference and need not exhibit conflation.", "slug": "rights_vs_freedoms"}], "residual_id": "r:rights_freedoms_obligation_mapping:b057_a10_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b057_a10_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Positive provision and negative noninterference obligations are being conflated. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Positive provision and negative noninterference obligations are being conflated."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime explicitly distinguishes provision from noninterference and need not exhibit conflation.", "slug": "rights_vs_freedoms"}], "normalized_requirement": "Positive provision and negative noninterference obligations are being conflated.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Positive provision and negative noninterference obligations are being conflated.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A single uncontested right or freedom can instantiate the distinction.", "slug": "rights_vs_freedoms"}], "residual_id": "r:rights_freedoms_obligation_mapping:b057_a10_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b057_a10_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is most valuable when multiple teams or jurisdictions would otherwise encode different interpretations. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Multiple rights claims collide across people, roles, resources, jurisdictions, or time.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Multiple rights claims collide across people, roles, resources, jurisdictions, or time.", "It is most valuable when multiple teams or jurisdictions would otherwise encode different interpretations."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A single uncontested right or freedom can instantiate the distinction.", "slug": "rights_vs_freedoms"}], "normalized_requirement": "Multiple rights claims collide across people, roles, resources, jurisdictions, or time.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Multiple rights claims collide across people, roles, resources, jurisdictions, or time.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P094-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"], ["O1", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the normative expectation, not merely possible encoding.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A permission system is expected to encode a substantive protection.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires encoding a substantive entitlement.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The encoded protection is an entitlement.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires encoding a substantive immunity.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The encoded protection is an immunity.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "A permission system is expected to encode a substantive entitlement or immunity.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "permission system is expected to encode substantive protection", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P094-C05-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The framework need not be implemented by a permission system.", "slug": "rights_vs_freedoms"}], "residual_id": "r:rights_freedoms_obligation_mapping:b057_a10_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b057_a10_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when a system must translate normative language into action and the words “right,” “freedom,” “permission,” “entitlement,” “choice,” “power,” or “duty” are carrying more than one meaning. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A permission system is expected to encode substantive entitlements or immunities.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A permission system is expected to encode substantive entitlements or immunities.", "Use this archetype when a system must translate normative language into action and the words “right,” “freedom,” “permission,” “entitlement,” “choice,” “power,” or “duty” are carrying more than one meaning."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The framework need not be implemented by a permission system.", "slug": "rights_vs_freedoms"}], "normalized_requirement": "A permission system is expected to encode substantive entitlements or immunities.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A permission system is expected to encode substantive entitlements or immunities.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P094-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"], ["O1", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve broad public interest as the asserted basis for the restriction.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A restriction is justified by an appeal to broad public interest.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires the lack of a necessity analysis.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Necessity analysis is absent from that justification.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires the lack of a least-restrictive analysis.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Least-restrictive analysis is absent from that justification.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "A restriction is justified by broad public interest while necessity analysis or least-restrictive analysis is absent.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "public-interest restriction lacks proportionality analysis", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P094-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A rights/freedoms classification does not entail an unjustified restriction.", "slug": "rights_vs_freedoms"}], "residual_id": "r:rights_freedoms_obligation_mapping:b057_a10_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b057_a10_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A restriction is justified by broad public interest without necessity or least-restrictive analysis. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A restriction is justified by broad public interest without necessity or least-restrictive analysis."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A rights/freedoms classification does not entail an unjustified restriction.", "slug": "rights_vs_freedoms"}], "normalized_requirement": "A restriction is justified by broad public interest without necessity or least-restrictive analysis.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A restriction is justified by broad public interest without necessity or least-restrictive analysis.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P094-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"], ["O1", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a formal actor-to-affected-party power relation.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "One actor has formal power to change another actor's position.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires uncertainty about the power's scope.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The scope of that power is unclear.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires uncertainty about how exercise of the power is reviewed.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The review path for use of that power is unclear.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "An actor has formal power to change another actor's position, while the power's scope or review path is unclear.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "formal position-changing power lacks governance clarity", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P094-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The normative relation can have clear scope and remedy.", "slug": "rights_vs_freedoms"}], "residual_id": "r:rights_freedoms_obligation_mapping:b057_a10_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b057_a10_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Conversely, when someone says an actor is “free” to do something, ask whether the action changes another party's position, consumes shared capacity, enters a protected domain, or depends on a provision duty. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: An actor has formal power to change another's position, but the scope or review path is unclear.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["An actor has formal power to change another's position, but the scope or review path is unclear.", "Conversely, when someone says an actor is “free” to do something, ask whether the action changes another party's position, consumes shared capacity, enters a protected domain, or depends on a provision duty."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The normative relation can have clear scope and remedy.", "slug": "rights_vs_freedoms"}], "normalized_requirement": "An actor has formal power to change another's position, but the scope or review path is unclear.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "An actor has formal power to change another's position, but the scope or review path is unclear.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A negative liberty can be fully usable without institutional provision.", "slug": "rights_vs_freedoms"}], "residual_id": "r:rights_freedoms_obligation_mapping:b057_a10_c7", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b057_a10_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Conversely, when someone says an actor is “free” to do something, ask whether the action changes another party's position, consumes shared capacity, enters a protected domain, or depends on a provision duty. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A protected liberty is unusable because capability, access, or institutional provision is absent.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A protected liberty is unusable because capability, access, or institutional provision is absent.", "Conversely, when someone says an actor is “free” to do something, ask whether the action changes another party's position, consumes shared capacity, enters a protected domain, or depends on a provision duty."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A negative liberty can be fully usable without institutional provision.", "slug": "rights_vs_freedoms"}], "normalized_requirement": "A protected liberty is unusable because capability, access, or institutional provision is absent.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A protected liberty is unusable because capability, access, or institutional provision is absent.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid right has a correlative duty and can have an operative remedy.", "slug": "rights_vs_freedoms"}], "residual_id": "r:rights_freedoms_obligation_mapping:b057_a10_c8", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b057_a10_c8", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Which safety claim, owed by whom, supported by what evidence and capacity? The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A claim is recognized rhetorically but has no duty bearer, capacity allocation, enforcement, or remedy.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A claim is recognized rhetorically but has no duty bearer, capacity allocation, enforcement, or remedy.", "Which safety claim, owed by whom, supported by what evidence and capacity?"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid right has a correlative duty and can have an operative remedy.", "slug": "rights_vs_freedoms"}], "normalized_requirement": "A claim is recognized rhetorically but has no duty bearer, capacity allocation, enforcement, or remedy.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A claim is recognized rhetorically but has no duty bearer, capacity allocation, enforcement, or remedy.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [8], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The distinction can operate with no exceptions.", "slug": "rights_vs_freedoms"}], "residual_id": "r:rights_freedoms_obligation_mapping:b057_a10_c9", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b057_a10_c9", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Rights and freedoms change through policy versions, technical releases, emergency rules, service closures, jurisdiction changes, reorganizations, and accumulated exceptions. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Exceptions accumulate until the nominal right or freedom has no stable operational core.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [9], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Exceptions accumulate until the nominal right or freedom has no stable operational core.", "Rights and freedoms change through policy versions, technical releases, emergency rules, service closures, jurisdiction changes, reorganizations, and accumulated exceptions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The distinction can operate with no exceptions.", "slug": "rights_vs_freedoms"}], "normalized_requirement": "Exceptions accumulate until the nominal right or freedom has no stable operational core.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Exceptions accumulate until the nominal right or freedom has no stable operational core.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [9], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A dispute process exists but the underlying normative positions remain unclassified.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Normative positions are relational: they distribute freedom, obligation, exposure, authority, protection, cost, and remedy among actors. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: A dispute process exists but the underlying normative positions remain unclassified. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [10], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A dispute process exists but the underlying normative positions remain unclassified.", "Normative positions are relational: they distribute freedom, obligation, exposure, authority, protection, cost, and remedy among actors."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 10, "text": "A dispute process exists but the underlying normative positions remain unclassified."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 57, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-057", "ledger_sha256": "5d88b290aa565a99bf0a2d5bc997f56939e8812d16490a21ed971d14df8e8b3a"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Risk-Adjustment and Benchmark Selection", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:risk_adjustment_benchmark_selection", "slug": "risk_adjustment_benchmark_selection"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Observed performance is often compared to a convenient raw baseline, causing risk compensation, exposure mix, benchmark mismatch, or model-selection artifacts to be mistaken for inefficiency, alpha, skill, anomaly, or failure.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Observed performance is often compared to a convenient raw baseline, causing risk compensation, exposure mix, benchmark mismatch, or model-selection artifacts to be mistaken for inefficiency, alpha, skill, anomaly, or failure."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Selection on noisy estimates can occur without a declared benchmark or peer comparison.", "slug": "selection_on_noisy_estimates"}], "residual_id": "r:risk_adjustment_benchmark_selection:b057_a11_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b057_a11_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Observed performance is often compared to a convenient raw baseline, causing risk compensation, exposure mix, benchmark mismatch, or model-selection artifacts to be mistaken for inefficiency, alpha, skill, anomaly, or failure. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A person, portfolio, program, policy, model, or organization is being judged against a benchmark or peer group.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A person, portfolio, program, policy, model, or organization is being judged against a benchmark or peer group.", "Observed performance is often compared to a convenient raw baseline, causing risk compensation, exposure mix, benchmark mismatch, or model-selection artifacts to be mistaken for inefficiency, alpha, skill, anomaly, or failure."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Selection on noisy estimates can occur without a declared benchmark or peer comparison.", "slug": "selection_on_noisy_estimates"}], "normalized_requirement": "A person, portfolio, program, policy, model, or organization is being judged against a benchmark or peer group.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A person, portfolio, program, policy, model, or organization is being judged against a benchmark or peer group.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A risk instance concerns one exposure distribution and does not require cross-unit heterogeneity.", "slug": "risk"}], "residual_id": "r:risk_adjustment_benchmark_selection:b057_a11_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b057_a11_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Outcomes differ because units carry different risks, exposures, constraints, time horizons, or opportunity sets. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Outcomes differ because units carry different risks, exposures, constraints, time horizons, or opportunity sets."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A risk instance concerns one exposure distribution and does not require cross-unit heterogeneity.", "slug": "risk"}], "normalized_requirement": "Outcomes differ because units carry different risks, exposures, constraints, time horizons, or opportunity sets.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Outcomes differ because units carry different risks, exposures, constraints, time horizons, or opportunity sets.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P094-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the claim-to-evidence dependency.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A claim's evaluation depends on the status of an observed excess.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve abnormality as a comparative judgment rather than mere excess.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The relevant status is whether the excess is abnormal relative to an adjusted benchmark.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must apply the abnormality assessment after, not before, plausible adjustment.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Abnormality is assessed after plausible adjustment.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "Evaluation of a claim depends on whether an observed excess remains abnormal after plausible adjustment.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "claim depends on adjusted abnormality of observed excess", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P094-C08-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Noisy selection does not entail factor-adjusted excess performance.", "slug": "selection_on_noisy_estimates"}], "residual_id": "r:risk_adjustment_benchmark_selection:b057_a11_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b057_a11_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The claim being evaluated depends on whether the observed excess is abnormal after plausible adjustment. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The claim being evaluated depends on whether the observed excess is abnormal after plausible adjustment."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Noisy selection does not entail factor-adjusted excess performance.", "slug": "selection_on_noisy_estimates"}], "normalized_requirement": "The claim being evaluated depends on whether the observed excess is abnormal after plausible adjustment.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The claim being evaluated depends on whether the observed excess is abnormal after plausible adjustment.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A noisy estimate can be evaluated against one unambiguous benchmark.", "slug": "selection_on_noisy_estimates"}], "residual_id": "r:risk_adjustment_benchmark_selection:b057_a11_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b057_a11_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Observed performance is often compared to a convenient raw baseline, causing risk compensation, exposure mix, benchmark mismatch, or model-selection artifacts to be mistaken for inefficiency, alpha, skill, anomaly, or failure. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Multiple plausible benchmarks or factor models exist, and conclusions could change depending on which one is chosen.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Multiple plausible benchmarks or factor models exist, and conclusions could change depending on which one is chosen.", "Observed performance is often compared to a convenient raw baseline, causing risk compensation, exposure mix, benchmark mismatch, or model-selection artifacts to be mistaken for inefficiency, alpha, skill, anomaly, or failure."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A noisy estimate can be evaluated against one unambiguous benchmark.", "slug": "selection_on_noisy_estimates"}], "normalized_requirement": "Multiple plausible benchmarks or factor models exist, and conclusions could change depending on which one is chosen.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Multiple plausible benchmarks or factor models exist, and conclusions could change depending on which one is chosen.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The evaluator must distinguish genuine inefficiency, skill, or anomaly from expected compensation for risk or exposure.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Observed performance is often compared to a convenient raw baseline, causing risk compensation, exposure mix, benchmark mismatch, or model-selection artifacts to be mistaken for inefficiency, alpha, skill, anomaly, or failure. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: The evaluator must distinguish genuine inefficiency, skill, or anomaly from expected compensation for risk or exposure. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The evaluator must distinguish genuine inefficiency, skill, or anomaly from expected compensation for risk or exposure.", "Observed performance is often compared to a convenient raw baseline, causing risk compensation, exposure mix, benchmark mismatch, or model-selection artifacts to be mistaken for inefficiency, alpha, skill, anomaly, or failure."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The evaluator must distinguish genuine inefficiency, skill, or anomaly from expected compensation for risk or exposure."}, {"display_text": "Stakeholders may have incentives to choose a flattering benchmark after seeing results.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Stakeholders may have incentives to choose a flattering benchmark after seeing results. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders may have incentives to choose a flattering benchmark after seeing results."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Stakeholders may have incentives to choose a flattering benchmark after seeing results."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 57, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-057", "ledger_sha256": "5d88b290aa565a99bf0a2d5bc997f56939e8812d16490a21ed971d14df8e8b3a"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Risk Aversion Calibration", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:risk_aversion_calibration", "slug": "risk_aversion_calibration"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a distorted risk posture. A person, group, or institution faces an uncertain option, but the possible loss occupies the whole decision field. That loss may be financial, reputational, operational, emotional, strategic, political, or safety-related. Because the loss feels vivid, the actor may treat avoidance as obviously prudent even when the actual probability is low, the downside can be capped, or inaction carries its own cost.\n\nThe opposite distortion is also possible. A group may become so attached to the potential gain that it treats risk concerns as obstruction. In that case, Risk Aversion Calibration protects against reckless framing by requiring the same discipline: name the perceived and actual downside, define non-negotiable boundaries, and design safeguards before committing.\n\nThe deep tension is that risk aversion has a real protective function. Removing it entirely would make systems fragile. But leaving it unexamined can make systems stagnant. Calibration keeps the protective signal while preventing it from becoming an automatic veto.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Actors avoid, delay, over-protect, or prematurely reject uncertain options because the possibility of loss is more salient than the evidence warrants, or because they cannot distinguish unacceptable risk from acceptable, bounded, reversible, or compensated risk."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Risk aversion can be rationally calibrated to evidence and need not reject a promising option.", "slug": "risk_aversion"}], "residual_id": "r:risk_aversion_calibration:b057_a12_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b057_a12_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The miscalibration may be excessive caution, such as a team rejecting every uncertain proposal because any loss feels unacceptable. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A promising option is repeatedly rejected because loss, embarrassment, variance, or downside feels intolerable without a clear comparison to evidence.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A promising option is repeatedly rejected because loss, embarrassment, variance, or\ndownside feels intolerable without a clear comparison to evidence.", "The miscalibration may be excessive caution, such as a team rejecting every uncertain proposal because any loss feels unacceptable."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Risk aversion can be rationally calibrated to evidence and need not reject a promising option.", "slug": "risk_aversion"}], "normalized_requirement": "A promising option is repeatedly rejected because loss, embarrassment, variance, or\ndownside feels intolerable without a clear comparison to evidence.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A promising option is repeatedly rejected because loss, embarrassment, variance, or\ndownside feels intolerable without a clear comparison to evidence.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Concave utility applies to risky status-quo wealth as well and does not imply status-quo bias.", "slug": "risk_aversion"}], "residual_id": "r:risk_aversion_calibration:b057_a12_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b057_a12_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A group may become so attached to the potential gain that it treats risk concerns as obstruction. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A group treats the status quo as risk-free while action is treated as risky.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A group treats the status quo as risk-free while action is treated as risky.", "A group may become so attached to the potential gain that it treats risk concerns as obstruction."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Concave utility applies to risky status-quo wealth as well and does not imply status-quo bias.", "slug": "risk_aversion"}], "normalized_requirement": "A group treats the status quo as risk-free while action is treated as risky.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A group treats the status quo as risk-free while action is treated as risky.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Exact risk aversion is defined over quantified lotteries and certainty equivalents, not vague fear.", "slug": "risk_aversion"}], "residual_id": "r:risk_aversion_calibration:b057_a12_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b057_a12_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The issue is the relationship between loss salience, evidence, protection, opportunity cost, and action. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Existing risk discussion jumps from vague fear directly to yes/no decisions without identifying safeguards or opportunity cost.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Existing risk discussion jumps from vague fear directly to yes/no decisions without\nidentifying safeguards or opportunity cost.", "The issue is the relationship between loss salience, evidence, protection, opportunity cost, and action."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Exact risk aversion is defined over quantified lotteries and certainty equivalents, not vague fear.", "slug": "risk_aversion"}], "normalized_requirement": "Existing risk discussion jumps from vague fear directly to yes/no decisions without\nidentifying safeguards or opportunity cost.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Existing risk discussion jumps from vague fear directly to yes/no decisions without\nidentifying safeguards or opportunity cost.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Stakeholders disagree because one side emphasizes possible loss and another side emphasizes possible gain without a shared risk ledger.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A group may become so attached to the potential gain that it treats risk concerns as obstruction. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Stakeholders disagree because one side emphasizes possible loss and another side emphasizes possible gain without a shared risk ledger. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders disagree because one side emphasizes possible loss and another side emphasizes possible gain without a shared risk ledger.", "A group may become so attached to the potential gain that it treats risk concerns as obstruction."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Stakeholders disagree because one side emphasizes possible loss and another side\nemphasizes possible gain without a shared risk ledger."}, {"display_text": "The decision is uncertain but potentially learnable through a pilot, small experiment, reference class, or staged commitment.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially suitable when the feared loss can be named and bounded, when a reversible pilot or staged commitment is possible, when a risk estimate can be improved with reference cases or small experiments, or when the status quo is being treated as if it had no risk. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: The decision is uncertain but potentially learnable through a pilot, small experiment, reference class, or staged commitment. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The decision is uncertain but potentially learnable through a pilot, small experiment, reference class, or staged commitment.", "It is especially suitable when the feared loss can be named and bounded, when a reversible pilot or staged commitment is possible, when a risk estimate can be improved with reference cases or small experiments, or when the status quo is being treated as if it had no risk."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The decision is uncertain but potentially learnable through a pilot, small experiment,\nreference class, or staged commitment."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 57, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-057", "ledger_sha256": "5d88b290aa565a99bf0a2d5bc997f56939e8812d16490a21ed971d14df8e8b3a"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Risk Pooling vs. Reinsurance Layering Strategy", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:risk_pooling_reinsurance_layering_strategy", "slug": "risk_pooling_reinsurance_layering_strategy"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A pool of uncertain exposures can reduce ordinary volatility, but correlated shocks, catastrophic tail events, or loss concentrations can exceed the pool capacity and turn mutualization into collective failure.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A pool of uncertain exposures can reduce ordinary volatility, but correlated shocks, catastrophic tail events, or loss concentrations can exceed the pool capacity and turn mutualization into collective failure."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime requires many independent or weakly correlated exposures aggregated into one pool.", "role_mapping": "Participants and claims -> exposure sources; imperfect correlation -> pooling assumption.", "slug": "risk_pooling", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b057_a13_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A pool of uncertain exposures can reduce ordinary volatility, but correlated shocks, catastrophic tail events, or loss concentrations can exceed the pool capacity and turn mutualization into collective failure. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Many participants, assets, claims, obligations, or contracts face uncertain losses that are not perfectly correlated.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Many participants, assets, claims, obligations, or contracts face uncertain losses that are not perfectly correlated.", "A pool of uncertain exposures can reduce ordinary volatility, but correlated shocks, catastrophic tail events, or loss concentrations can exceed the pool capacity and turn mutualization into collective failure."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Risk Pooling", "one_liner": "Aggregating many independent or weakly correlated exposures so that the variance of the pooled outcome shrinks below the sum of individual variances, letting participants share a more predictable collective risk.", "page_ref": "prime:risk_pooling", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Participants and claims -> exposure sources; imperfect correlation -> pooling assumption.", "slug": "risk_pooling", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime requires many independent or weakly correlated exposures aggregated into one pool."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Many participants, assets, claims, obligations, or contracts face uncertain losses that are not perfectly correlated.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Statistical aggregation reduces ordinary per-unit volatility and supplies pooling efficiency.", "role_mapping": "Moderate losses -> idiosyncratic exposures; direct pool -> variance reduction.", "slug": "risk_pooling", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b057_a13_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A primary pool gains efficiency by retaining shared uncertainty, but it loses resilience when the retained layer includes losses whose scale, correlation, or timing exceed the pool capacity. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Ordinary or moderate losses are frequent enough that direct pooling creates administrative or statistical efficiency.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Ordinary or moderate losses are frequent enough that direct pooling creates administrative or statistical efficiency.", "A primary pool gains efficiency by retaining shared uncertainty, but it loses resilience when the retained layer includes losses whose scale, correlation, or timing exceed the pool capacity."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Risk Pooling", "one_liner": "Aggregating many independent or weakly correlated exposures so that the variance of the pooled outcome shrinks below the sum of individual variances, letting participants share a more predictable collective risk.", "page_ref": "prime:risk_pooling", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Moderate losses -> idiosyncratic exposures; direct pool -> variance reduction.", "slug": "risk_pooling", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Statistical aggregation reduces ordinary per-unit volatility and supplies pooling efficiency."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Ordinary or moderate losses are frequent enough that direct pooling creates administrative or statistical efficiency.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A well-capitalized pool may absorb its tail and need not face solvency or legitimacy failure.", "slug": "risk_pooling"}], "residual_id": "r:risk_pooling_reinsurance_layering_strategy:b057_a13_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b057_a13_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A primary pool gains efficiency by retaining shared uncertainty, but it loses resilience when the retained layer includes losses whose scale, correlation, or timing exceed the pool capacity. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Extreme or systemic losses would threaten solvency, service continuity, political legitimacy, or contractual performance if retained entirely in the pool.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Extreme or systemic losses would threaten solvency, service continuity, political legitimacy, or contractual performance if retained entirely in the pool.", "A primary pool gains efficiency by retaining shared uncertainty, but it loses resilience when the retained layer includes losses whose scale, correlation, or timing exceed the pool capacity."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A well-capitalized pool may absorb its tail and need not face solvency or legitimacy failure.", "slug": "risk_pooling"}], "normalized_requirement": "Extreme or systemic losses would threaten solvency, service continuity, political legitimacy, or contractual performance if retained entirely in the pool.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Extreme or systemic losses would threaten solvency, service continuity, political legitimacy, or contractual performance if retained entirely in the pool.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime requires a counterparty able to absorb an adverse-outcome distribution more cheaply or tolerably.", "role_mapping": "External carrier -> absorber; transferred layer -> adverse distribution.", "slug": "risk_transfer", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b057_a13_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A primary pool gains efficiency by retaining shared uncertainty, but it loses resilience when the retained layer includes losses whose scale, correlation, or timing exceed the pool capacity. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: External markets, institutions, guarantors, reinsurers, counterparties, or contingent contracts can absorb some layers more efficiently than the primary pool.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["External markets, institutions, guarantors, reinsurers, counterparties, or contingent contracts can absorb some layers more efficiently than the primary pool.", "A primary pool gains efficiency by retaining shared uncertainty, but it loses resilience when the retained layer includes losses whose scale, correlation, or timing exceed the pool capacity."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Risk Transfer", "one_liner": "Shifting an adverse-outcome distribution from one party to another for a price, so the loss lands on whoever can bear it best.", "page_ref": "prime:risk_transfer", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "External carrier -> absorber; transferred layer -> adverse distribution.", "slug": "risk_transfer", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime requires a counterparty able to absorb an adverse-outcome distribution more cheaply or tolerably."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "External markets, institutions, guarantors, reinsurers, counterparties, or contingent contracts can absorb some layers more efficiently than the primary pool.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The design team must choose what to retain, what to transfer, and where each layer should attach.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A primary pool gains efficiency by retaining shared uncertainty, but it loses resilience when the retained layer includes losses whose scale, correlation, or timing exceed the pool capacity. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: The design team must choose what to retain, what to transfer, and where each layer should attach. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The design team must choose what to retain, what to transfer, and where each layer should attach.", "A primary pool gains efficiency by retaining shared uncertainty, but it loses resilience when the retained layer includes losses whose scale, correlation, or timing exceed the pool capacity."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The design team must choose what to retain, what to transfer, and where each layer should attach."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 57, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-057", "ledger_sha256": "5d88b290aa565a99bf0a2d5bc997f56939e8812d16490a21ed971d14df8e8b3a"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Rite-of-Passage Liminal Phase Management", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:rite_of_passage_liminal_phase_management", "slug": "rite_of_passage_liminal_phase_management"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is incomplete status transition. The old role has loosened, the new role is not fully recognized, and the participant is left in a liminal state without enough containment, meaning, or closure. Administrative reassignment alone cannot solve this when the transition depends on social recognition and identity integration.\n\nCommon symptoms include empty ceremonies, unrecognized promotions, awkward reentry after absence, newcomers who never feel like real members, public announcements that do not change expectations, or informal hazing filling the ritual vacuum.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A transition changes role, identity, membership, authority, maturity, or social standing, but the change is handled as a mere announcement, formality, or administrative step. Participants remain psychologically or socially suspended: no longer fully in the old status, not yet recognized in the new one, and unsure how to act or be treated."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime is the marked threshold state between prior and new roles or statuses.", "role_mapping": "Moving person or group -> liminal actor; statuses -> separation and incorporation.", "slug": "liminality", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b057_a14_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when a transition changes role, identity, membership, authority, maturity, legitimacy, or belonging, and the change must be recognized by a relevant group. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A person or group is moving between statuses, roles, memberships, life stages, offices, teams, communities, or public identities.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A person or group is moving between statuses, roles, memberships, life stages, offices, teams, communities, or public identities.", "Use this archetype when a transition changes role, identity, membership, authority, maturity, legitimacy, or belonging, and the change must be recognized by a relevant group."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Liminality", "one_liner": "Transitional states.", "page_ref": "prime:liminality", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Moving person or group -> liminal actor; statuses -> separation and incorporation.", "slug": "liminality", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime is the marked threshold state between prior and new roles or statuses."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A person or group is moving between statuses, roles, memberships, life stages, offices, teams, communities, or public identities.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Liminality is socially and symbolically structured beyond a logistical handoff.", "role_mapping": "Symbolic weight -> marked threshold; social weight -> status transformation.", "slug": "liminality", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b057_a14_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Administrative reassignment alone cannot solve this when the transition depends on social recognition and identity integration. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The transition carries emotional, symbolic, ethical, or social weight beyond logistical handoff.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The transition carries emotional, symbolic, ethical, or social weight beyond logistical handoff.", "Administrative reassignment alone cannot solve this when the transition depends on social recognition and identity integration."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Liminality", "one_liner": "Transitional states.", "page_ref": "prime:liminality", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Symbolic weight -> marked threshold; social weight -> status transformation.", "slug": "liminality", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Liminality is socially and symbolically structured beyond a logistical handoff."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The transition carries emotional, symbolic, ethical, or social weight beyond logistical handoff.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Status ambiguity and indefinite betwixt-and-between identity are defining risks of an unmanaged liminal phase.", "role_mapping": "Ambiguity -> suspended status; in-betweenness -> liminal middle.", "slug": "liminality", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b057_a14_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The transition must be meaningfully marked as a break from the prior state, but too much rupture can disorient, isolate, or harm participants; too little rupture leaves the new status socially unreal. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The transition is prone to ambiguity, shame, drift, exclusion, or indefinite in-betweenness if not explicitly marked.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The transition is prone to ambiguity, shame, drift, exclusion, or indefinite in-betweenness if not explicitly marked.", "The transition must be meaningfully marked as a break from the prior state, but too much rupture can disorient, isolate, or harm participants; too little rupture leaves the new status socially unreal."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Liminality", "one_liner": "Transitional states.", "page_ref": "prime:liminality", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Ambiguity -> suspended status; in-betweenness -> liminal middle.", "slug": "liminality", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Status ambiguity and indefinite betwixt-and-between identity are defining risks of an unmanaged liminal phase."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The transition is prone to ambiguity, shame, drift, exclusion, or indefinite in-betweenness if not explicitly marked.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Observers must recognize the change for it to become legitimate, not merely recorded.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: Observers must recognize the change for it to become legitimate, not merely recorded. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Observers must recognize the change for it to become legitimate, not merely recorded."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Observers must recognize the change for it to become legitimate, not merely recorded."}, {"display_text": "Participants need a bounded period to detach from old expectations and rehearse or internalize new ones.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: Participants need a bounded period to detach from old expectations and rehearse or internalize new ones. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Participants need a bounded period to detach from old expectations and rehearse or internalize new ones."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Participants need a bounded period to detach from old expectations and rehearse or internalize new ones."}, {"display_text": "The community needs continuity while still acknowledging a real rupture or threshold crossing.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The community needs continuity while still acknowledging a real rupture or threshold crossing. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The community needs continuity while still acknowledging a real rupture or threshold crossing."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The community needs continuity while still acknowledging a real rupture or threshold crossing."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 57, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-057", "ledger_sha256": "5d88b290aa565a99bf0a2d5bc997f56939e8812d16490a21ed971d14df8e8b3a"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Ritualized Meaning and Commitment Enactment", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:ritualized_meaning_and_commitment_enactment", "slug": "ritualized_meaning_and_commitment_enactment"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A community, institution, or relationship depends on meanings and commitments that remain abstract, episodic, privately held, or vulnerable to turnover; ordinary communication does not create a shared, memorable, embodied occasion for renewing them.\n\nThe practice must be stable and recognizable enough to carry memory and shared meaning, yet revisable, plural, consent-aware, and accountable enough not to turn continuity into coercion or inherited harm.\n\nA group can state values propositionally yet fail to make them socially available. New members may not know how memory is carried; ordinary meetings may privilege the loudest participants; important losses and contributions may remain invisible; commitments may lose force after an announcement. Ritual answers by making a bounded occasion, but the same boundedness can produce insiders, orthodoxy, pressure, and sanctified contradiction. The design problem therefore includes both meaning formation and power governance.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A community, institution, or relationship depends on meanings and commitments that remain abstract, episodic, privately held, or vulnerable to turnover; ordinary communication does not create a shared, memorable, embodied occasion for renewing them."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Ritual carries symbolic meaning, memory, identity, and social bonds through repeated acts.", "role_mapping": "Value or memory -> symbolic content; persistence -> repetition.", "slug": "ritual", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b057_a15_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "New members may not know how memory is carried; ordinary meetings may privilege the loudest participants; important losses and contributions may remain invisible; commitments may lose force after an announcement. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A value, memory, identity, obligation, or relationship must remain salient across time and membership change.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A value, memory, identity, obligation, or relationship must remain salient across time and membership change.", "New members may not know how memory is carried; ordinary meetings may privilege the loudest participants; important losses and contributions may remain invisible; commitments may lose force after an announcement."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Ritual", "one_liner": "Symbolic repeated acts.", "page_ref": "prime:ritual", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Value or memory -> symbolic content; persistence -> repetition.", "slug": "ritual", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Ritual carries symbolic meaning, memory, identity, and social bonds through repeated acts."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A value, memory, identity, obligation, or relationship must remain salient across time and membership change.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A ritual is a rule-governed performative occasion, not ordinary transaction or information exchange.", "role_mapping": "Distinct occasion -> marked performative activity.", "slug": "ritual", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b057_a15_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when a group needs more than information transfer and more than routine scheduling. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Participants need an occasion distinct from routine transaction or information exchange.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Participants need an occasion distinct from routine transaction or information exchange.", "Use this archetype when a group needs more than information transfer and more than routine scheduling."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Ritual", "one_liner": "Symbolic repeated acts.", "page_ref": "prime:ritual", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Distinct occasion -> marked performative activity.", "slug": "ritual", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A ritual is a rule-governed performative occasion, not ordinary transaction or information exchange."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Participants need an occasion distinct from routine transaction or information exchange.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime combines repeatable symbolic form with performative enactment of social meaning.", "role_mapping": "Repeatable practice -> ritual form; recognition and follow-through -> performative function.", "slug": "ritual", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b057_a15_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The shared matter must benefit from repeated, socially legible, symbolically marked enactment, and the group must be willing to govern who can sponsor it, who is affected, how participation works, what practical consequences follow, and how the form can change or end. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A repeatable practice can connect symbolic recognition to practical follow-through.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A repeatable practice can connect symbolic recognition to practical follow-through.", "The shared matter must benefit from repeated, socially legible, symbolically marked enactment, and the group must be willing to govern who can sponsor it, who is affected, how participation works, what practical consequences follow, and how the form can change or end."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Ritual", "one_liner": "Symbolic repeated acts.", "page_ref": "prime:ritual", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Repeatable practice -> ritual form; recognition and follow-through -> performative function.", "slug": "ritual", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime combines repeatable symbolic form with performative enactment of social meaning."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A repeatable practice can connect symbolic recognition to practical follow-through.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The group can name a legitimate shared purpose without requiring uniform private belief.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The strongest cases involve continuity under turnover, recognition that ordinary workflow neglects, memory vulnerable to erasure, commitments that decay without renewal, or plural communities that need a common occasion without requiring a common private belief. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The group can name a legitimate shared purpose without requiring uniform private belief. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The group can name a legitimate shared purpose without requiring uniform private belief.", "The strongest cases involve continuity under turnover, recognition that ordinary workflow neglects, memory vulnerable to erasure, commitments that decay without renewal, or plural communities that need a common occasion without requiring a common private belief."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "The group can name a legitimate shared purpose without requiring uniform private belief."}, {"display_text": "There is capacity to govern consent, access, safety, revision, repair, and retirement.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this deployment constraint: There is capacity to govern consent, access, safety, revision, repair, and retirement. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["There is capacity to govern consent, access, safety, revision, repair, and retirement."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "There is capacity to govern consent, access, safety, revision, repair, and retirement."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 57, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-057", "ledger_sha256": "5d88b290aa565a99bf0a2d5bc997f56939e8812d16490a21ed971d14df8e8b3a"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Robust Solution Selection", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:robust_solution_selection", "slug": "robust_solution_selection"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 3 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is fragile optimality. A solution can be optimal under a selected assumption set while being a poor commitment under realistic variation. In practice, this often appears as a low-cost plan that fails during demand spikes, a high-performing design that collapses under environmental variation, or a policy that works for average cases but harms edge cases.\n\nThe deeper tension is between efficiency under a forecast and survivability under uncertainty. Robust Solution Selection does not pretend uncertainty is solved. It makes the choice resilient to credible uncertainty by selecting for acceptable performance across a defined envelope.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A solution appears optimal under a single baseline estimate, model, forecast, or assumption set, but plausible shifts in parameters, scenarios, demand, cost, behavior, environment, or implementation context could make that solution unacceptable."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime requires a system to preserve specified function across a declared perturbation class.", "role_mapping": "Uncertain conditions -> perturbations; chosen option -> system.", "slug": "robustness", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b058_a01_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The chosen option must operate under uncertain conditions. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The chosen option must operate under uncertain conditions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Robustness", "one_liner": "Maintain functionality under stress.", "page_ref": "prime:robustness", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Uncertain conditions -> perturbations; chosen option -> system.", "slug": "robustness", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime requires a system to preserve specified function across a declared perturbation class."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The chosen option must operate under uncertain conditions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Sensitivity analysis may show a nominal optimum is stable rather than fragile.", "slug": "sensitivity_analysis_in_operations_research"}], "residual_id": "r:robust_solution_selection:b058_a01_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b058_a01_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when a decision has meaningful uncertainty, the cost of being wrong is material, and available options behave differently across plausible scenarios. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A best-estimate optimum has meaningful downside under plausible variation.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A best-estimate optimum has meaningful downside under plausible variation.", "Use this archetype when a decision has meaningful uncertainty, the cost of being wrong is material, and available options behave differently across plausible scenarios."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Sensitivity analysis may show a nominal optimum is stable rather than fragile.", "slug": "sensitivity_analysis_in_operations_research"}], "normalized_requirement": "A best-estimate optimum has meaningful downside under plausible variation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A best-estimate optimum has meaningful downside under plausible variation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A robustness claim can assess one system without comparing candidates.", "slug": "robustness"}], "residual_id": "r:robust_solution_selection:b058_a01_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b058_a01_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The pattern needs a candidate set, plausible uncertainty ranges or scenarios, criteria for acceptable performance, and a selection rule that lets scenario evidence affect the final choice. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Candidate solutions differ in stability, downside exposure, or scenario coverage.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Candidate solutions differ in stability, downside exposure, or scenario coverage.", "The pattern needs a candidate set, plausible uncertainty ranges or scenarios, criteria for acceptable performance, and a selection rule that lets scenario evidence affect the final choice."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A robustness claim can assess one system without comparing candidates.", "slug": "robustness"}], "normalized_requirement": "Candidate solutions differ in stability, downside exposure, or scenario coverage.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Candidate solutions differ in stability, downside exposure, or scenario coverage.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Decision-makers can define acceptable performance or unacceptable failure.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It makes the choice resilient to credible uncertainty by selecting for acceptable performance across a defined envelope. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: Decision-makers can define acceptable performance or unacceptable failure. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Decision-makers can define acceptable performance or unacceptable failure.", "It makes the choice resilient to credible uncertainty by selecting for acceptable performance across a defined envelope."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Decision-makers can define acceptable performance or unacceptable failure."}, {"display_text": "The cost of being wrong is material, delayed, irreversible, public, or safety-relevant.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when a decision has meaningful uncertainty, the cost of being wrong is material, and available options behave differently across plausible scenarios. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The cost of being wrong is material, delayed, irreversible, public, or safety-relevant. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The cost of being wrong is material, delayed, irreversible, public, or safety-relevant.", "Use this archetype when a decision has meaningful uncertainty, the cost of being wrong is material, and available options behave differently across plausible scenarios."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The cost of being wrong is material, delayed, irreversible, public, or safety-relevant."}, {"display_text": "Sensitivity analysis, scenario analysis, or stress testing has already exposed fragility.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Sensitivity analysis, scenario analysis, or stress testing has already exposed fragility. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Sensitivity analysis, scenario analysis, or stress testing has already exposed fragility."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Sensitivity analysis, scenario analysis, or stress testing has already exposed fragility."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 58, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-058", "ledger_sha256": "310544d61131a17d0ef39e8022c663e9b6fde54ff865eb7a7312fcc9450d943a"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Robustness Margin Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:robustness_margin_design", "slug": "robustness_margin_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 0, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 0 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 0 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 0}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is brittle optimization around a narrow operating assumption. A design may work when demand is average, users behave as expected, components are within perfect fit, data are clean, staff are present, or the environment stays calm. But real systems rarely stay at the nominal point.\n\nThe brittle system has too little distance between ordinary operation and failure. It may pass ordinary tests while still failing at plausible edge cases. It may also hide fragility by relying on operators, users, or downstream systems to compensate whenever small deviations occur.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system functions under nominal conditions but fails when inputs, environment, users, components, measurements, or demand vary within plausible ranges."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [], "condition_structure": "DISJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Nominal-condition brittleness.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system functions under nominal conditions but fails when inputs, environment, users, components, measurements, or demand vary within plausible ranges. In this archetype, the relevant source condition requiring clarification is: Nominal-condition brittleness. The wording is retained for source review rather than assigned a stronger semantic role.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Nominal-condition brittleness", "A system functions under nominal conditions but fails when inputs, environment, users, components, measurements, or demand vary within plausible ranges."]}, "function": "MALFORMED", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because the source wording is not structurally clear enough to support a formal trigger role without clarification.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "Nominal-condition brittleness"}, {"display_text": "High consequence of small deviation.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially appropriate when small deviations have high consequences, when future operating conditions are uncertain but not completely unknowable, or when efficiency pressure has removed too much cushion. In this archetype, the relevant source condition requiring clarification is: High consequence of small deviation. The wording is retained for source review rather than assigned a stronger semantic role.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["High consequence of small deviation", "It is especially appropriate when small deviations have high consequences, when future operating conditions are uncertain but not completely unknowable, or when efficiency pressure has removed too much cushion."]}, "function": "MALFORMED", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because the source wording is not structurally clear enough to support a formal trigger role without clarification.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "High consequence of small deviation"}, {"display_text": "Uncertainty in operating conditions.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially appropriate when small deviations have high consequences, when future operating conditions are uncertain but not completely unknowable, or when efficiency pressure has removed too much cushion. In this archetype, the relevant source condition requiring clarification is: Uncertainty in operating conditions. The wording is retained for source review rather than assigned a stronger semantic role.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Uncertainty in operating conditions", "It is especially appropriate when small deviations have high consequences, when future operating conditions are uncertain but not completely unknowable, or when efficiency pressure has removed too much cushion."]}, "function": "MALFORMED", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because the source wording is not structurally clear enough to support a formal trigger role without clarification.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Uncertainty in operating conditions"}, {"display_text": "Efficiency pressure has eroded cushion.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially appropriate when small deviations have high consequences, when future operating conditions are uncertain but not completely unknowable, or when efficiency pressure has removed too much cushion. In this archetype, the relevant source condition requiring clarification is: Efficiency pressure has eroded cushion. The wording is retained for source review rather than assigned a stronger semantic role.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Efficiency pressure has eroded cushion", "It is especially appropriate when small deviations have high consequences, when future operating conditions are uncertain but not completely unknowable, or when efficiency pressure has removed too much cushion."]}, "function": "MALFORMED", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because the source wording is not structurally clear enough to support a formal trigger role without clarification.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Efficiency pressure has eroded cushion"}, {"display_text": "Variation accumulates across interfaces.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this source condition requiring clarification: Variation accumulates across interfaces. The wording is retained for source review rather than assigned a stronger semantic role.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Variation accumulates across interfaces"]}, "function": "MALFORMED", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because the source wording is not structurally clear enough to support a formal trigger role without clarification.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Variation accumulates across interfaces"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 58, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-058", "ledger_sha256": "310544d61131a17d0ef39e8022c663e9b6fde54ff865eb7a7312fcc9450d943a"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Role Expectation Architecture", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:role_expectation_architecture", "slug": "role_expectation_architecture"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A group, institution, system, or workflow depends on recurring positions, but the expected behaviours attached to those positions are tacit, person-dependent, overbroad, under-resourced, conflicting, illegitimate, or hard to transfer. Participants cannot tell what a role-holder may decide, what others may expect, when the role is being misused, how the role interfaces with neighboring roles, or what happens when the holder leaves.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A group, institution, system, or workflow depends on recurring positions, but the expected behaviours attached to those positions are tacit, person-dependent, overbroad, under-resourced, conflicting, illegitimate, or hard to transfer. Participants cannot tell what a role-holder may decide, what others may expect, when the role is being misused, how the role interfaces with neighboring roles, or what happens when the holder leaves."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime distinguishes a recurring social position from successive occupants.", "role_mapping": "Position -> role; actors over time -> occupants.", "slug": "role", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b058_a03_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The role must persist beyond one incumbent. In this condition set, the requirement is: A recurring position must be occupied by different actors across time.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A recurring position must be occupied by different actors across time."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Role", "one_liner": "A bundle of expected behaviours attached to a social position.", "page_ref": "prime:role", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Position -> role; actors over time -> occupants.", "slug": "role", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime distinguishes a recurring social position from successive occupants."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A recurring position must be occupied by different actors across time.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A role is constituted by reliable expected behaviors and restraints that others coordinate around.", "role_mapping": "Expected conduct -> role bundle; others -> counterpart expectations.", "slug": "role", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b058_a03_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Predictability and reliance are central. In this condition set, the requirement is: Others need reliable expectations about what the role-holder will do or refrain from doing.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Others need reliable expectations about what the role-holder will do or refrain from doing."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Role", "one_liner": "A bundle of expected behaviours attached to a social position.", "page_ref": "prime:role", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Expected conduct -> role bundle; others -> counterpart expectations.", "slug": "role", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A role is constituted by reliable expected behaviors and restraints that others coordinate around."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Others need reliable expectations about what the role-holder will do or refrain from doing.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid role can have a completely clear expectation bundle.", "slug": "role"}], "residual_id": "r:role_expectation_architecture:b058_a03_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b058_a03_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The name of the position is not enough. In this condition set, the requirement is: A title, office, job, volunteer slot, ecological niche, or system function exists but its behavioral bundle is unclear.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A title, office, job, volunteer slot, ecological niche, or system function exists but its behavioral bundle is unclear."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid role can have a completely clear expectation bundle.", "slug": "role"}], "normalized_requirement": "A title, office, job, volunteer slot, ecological niche, or system function exists but its behavioral bundle is unclear.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A title, office, job, volunteer slot, ecological niche, or system function exists but its behavioral bundle is unclear.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Role-linked authority and obligation attach to the position rather than personal identity.", "role_mapping": "Authority and support -> role expectations; person -> occupant.", "slug": "role", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b058_a03_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Position-bound powers and duties need boundaries. In this condition set, the requirement is: Authority, obligation, access, accountability, or support is attached to a position rather than only to a person.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Authority, obligation, access, accountability, or support is attached to a position rather than only to a person."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Role", "one_liner": "A bundle of expected behaviours attached to a social position.", "page_ref": "prime:role", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Authority and support -> role expectations; person -> occupant.", "slug": "role", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Role-linked authority and obligation attach to the position rather than personal identity."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Authority, obligation, access, accountability, or support is attached to a position rather than only to a person.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Role expectations can be fully formalized and portable.", "slug": "role"}], "residual_id": "r:role_expectation_architecture:b058_a03_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b058_a03_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Codification must preserve necessary judgment without leaving expectations invisible. In this condition set, the requirement is: Role performance depends on tacit norms, informal expectations, or local interpretation.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Role performance depends on tacit norms, informal expectations, or local interpretation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Role expectations can be fully formalized and portable.", "slug": "role"}], "normalized_requirement": "Role performance depends on tacit norms, informal expectations, or local interpretation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Role performance depends on tacit norms, informal expectations, or local interpretation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A well-specified role can transfer cleanly across turnover.", "slug": "role"}], "residual_id": "r:role_expectation_architecture:b058_a03_c7", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b058_a03_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A role architecture problem appears when continuity fails. In this condition set, the requirement is: Turnover, rotation, scaling, crisis, growth, automation, or cross-boundary work exposes that the role is not transferable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Turnover, rotation, scaling, crisis, growth, automation, or cross-boundary work exposes that the role is not transferable."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A well-specified role can transfer cleanly across turnover.", "slug": "role"}], "normalized_requirement": "Turnover, rotation, scaling, crisis, growth, automation, or cross-boundary work exposes that the role is not transferable.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Turnover, rotation, scaling, crisis, growth, automation, or cross-boundary work exposes that the role is not transferable.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Multiple roles interact, overlap, conflict, or require handoffs.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Role interfaces and role-conflict guards become necessary. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Multiple roles interact, overlap, conflict, or require handoffs. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Multiple roles interact, overlap, conflict, or require handoffs.", "Role interfaces and role-conflict guards become necessary."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Multiple roles interact, overlap, conflict, or require handoffs."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 58, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-058", "ledger_sha256": "310544d61131a17d0ef39e8022c663e9b6fde54ff865eb7a7312fcc9450d943a"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Role-Expectation Conflict Reconciliation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:role_expectation_conflict_reconciliation", "slug": "role_expectation_conflict_reconciliation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 5, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 5 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 1 of 5 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Role conflict occurs when satisfying one legitimate expectation breaches, delays, or undermines another. Organizations often misdescribe it as resilience, productivity, or communication failure. That lets principals externalize impossible demands and makes the individual choose privately which beneficiary will be harmed.\n\nThe conflict can concern time, authority, loyalty, ethics, identity, care, information, impartiality, or responsibility without matching resources. It may occur across roles or inside one role with multiple principals.\n\n### Map actors, roles, and expectation sources\n\nSeparate the **actor** from the **role** and the **role** from each **expectation**. One actor can occupy several roles; one role can be occupied by several actors; and one role can receive expectations from many sources. For every material expectation, record the source, claimed authority, beneficiary, required action or restraint, quality standard, timing, information boundary, resources, consequence of breach, and route for interpretation or appeal.\n\nInclude formal and informal sources. Statutes, professional codes, contracts, job descriptions, delegations, and policies may have explicit standing. Performance targets, team norms, cultural expectations, care relationships, identity commitments, and emergency practices may be less formal but still exert real force. Informality does not make an expectation unreal; it does mean legitimacy and enforceability require careful examination.\n\n### Distinguish ambiguity, tension, overload, and conflict\n\n**Ambiguity** means the expectation or authority is unclear. **Tension** means duties compete but can coexist with ordinary judgment. **Overload** means compatible duties exceed available capacity. **Conflict** means satisfying one material expectation necessarily violates, delays beyond tolerance, compromises, or conceals another under realistic conditions. These diagnoses can combine, but their remedies differ.\n\nTest compatibility at peak conditions and across the complete duty cycle. Two roles may fit average hours yet collide at month-end, emergencies, court deadlines, school pickup, or recovery periods. A duty may be technically sequenced but not ethically sequenced if delay creates irreversible harm. A conflict may also be conditional: confidentiality and reporting are compatible until specified facts trigger a mandatory duty.\n\n### Identify incompatible obligation types\n\nTime and presence conflicts are only one class. Authority conflict assigns responsibility without decision power. Loyalty conflict binds the actor to principals with opposed interests. Confidentiality conflict pits information protection against disclosure or reporting. Impartiality conflict combines advocacy, benefit, or prior involvement with independent judgment. Care and performance conflict places relational duty against throughput. Identity conflict makes role performance demand denial or betrayal of a salient community or self commitment. Ethical conflict pits an instruction against law, safety, rights, or professional standards.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A person, team, office, or agent occupies multiple roles or receives incompatible expectations within one role. Satisfying one duty necessarily delays, compromises, conceals, or violates another. The contradiction is treated as an individual resilience or time-management failure, allowing principals to externalize impossible demands and obscuring who is harmed by the tradeoff."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P094-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve at least two roles.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Two distinct roles impose demands.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve temporal overlap.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The two roles' demands are simultaneous.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires contention for the same time.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Both roles require the same time.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires contention for the same attention.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Both roles require the same attention.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires contention for the same resource.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Both roles require the same resource.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires contention for the same authority.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "Both roles require the same authority.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires contention for the same presence.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "Both roles require the same presence.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Two roles simultaneously require the same time, attention, resource, authority, or presence.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "two roles simultaneously claim the same capacity", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P094-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Role conflict may concern incompatible values with no shared resource contention.", "slug": "role_conflict"}], "residual_id": "r:role_expectation_conflict_reconciliation:b058_a04_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b058_a04_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Time and presence conflicts are only one class. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Two roles require simultaneous use of the same time, attention, resource, authority, or presence.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Two roles require simultaneous use of the same time, attention, resource, authority, or presence.", "Time and presence conflicts are only one class."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A complete unity-of-command breakdown without simultaneous demands by two authority-bearing roles is impossible under the subordinate-task-time in-edge definition.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Unity-of-Command Breakdown", "one_liner": "The command-and-control failure in which one subordinate node in the authority graph carries two or more binding in-edges for the same task at the same time, so that when the supervisors' orders diverge the actor cannot comply with both.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:unity_of_command_breakdown", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "unity_of_command_breakdown"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "unity_of_command_breakdown", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P094-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "The candidate directly completes the authority branch: two supervisor roles impose simultaneous, overlapping binding-authority demands."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Two roles require simultaneous use of the same time, attention, resource, authority, or presence.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Role conflict can concern scheduling rather than loyalty, confidentiality, care, or reporting.", "slug": "role_conflict"}], "residual_id": "r:role_expectation_conflict_reconciliation:b058_a04_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b058_a04_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A conflict may also be conditional: confidentiality and reporting are compatible until specified facts trigger a mandatory duty. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Loyalty, confidentiality, impartiality, care, advocacy, enforcement, or reporting duties conflict.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Loyalty, confidentiality, impartiality, care, advocacy, enforcement, or reporting duties conflict.", "A conflict may also be conditional: confidentiality and reporting are compatible until specified facts trigger a mandatory duty."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Role conflict can concern scheduling rather than loyalty, confidentiality, care, or reporting.", "slug": "role_conflict"}], "normalized_requirement": "Loyalty, confidentiality, impartiality, care, advocacy, enforcement, or reporting duties conflict.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Loyalty, confidentiality, impartiality, care, advocacy, enforcement, or reporting duties conflict.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "One internally inconsistent role can create conflict without multiple principals.", "slug": "role_conflict"}], "residual_id": "r:role_expectation_conflict_reconciliation:b058_a04_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b058_a04_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Separate the **actor* from the **role* and the **role* from each **expectation**. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Different principals issue incompatible expectations to the same role.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Different principals issue incompatible expectations to the same role.", "Separate the **actor* from the **role* and the **role* from each **expectation**."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "One internally inconsistent role can create conflict without multiple principals.", "slug": "role_conflict"}], "normalized_requirement": "Different principals issue incompatible expectations to the same role.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Different principals issue incompatible expectations to the same role.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P094-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"], ["O1", "O3"], ["O1", "O4"], ["O1", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve actual incompatibility or tension, not mere coexistence.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Performance targets impose demands that conflict with a governing constraint.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a safety constraint.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The conflicting constraint is safety.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires an ethical constraint.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The conflicting constraint is ethics.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a due-process constraint.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The conflicting constraint is due process.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a professional-standard constraint.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The conflicting constraint is a professional standard.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Performance targets conflict with safety, ethics, due process, or professional standards.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "performance targets conflict with a normative constraint", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P094-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Role conflict need not involve a performance metric or professional standard.", "slug": "role_conflict"}], "residual_id": "r:role_expectation_conflict_reconciliation:b058_a04_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b058_a04_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Ethical conflict pits an instruction against law, safety, rights, or professional standards. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Performance targets conflict with safety, ethics, due process, or professional standards.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Performance targets conflict with safety, ethics, due process, or professional standards.", "Ethical conflict pits an instruction against law, safety, rights, or professional standards."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Role conflict need not involve a performance metric or professional standard.", "slug": "role_conflict"}], "normalized_requirement": "Performance targets conflict with safety, ethics, due process, or professional standards.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Performance targets conflict with safety, ethics, due process, or professional standards.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B5", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P094-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O3", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve cross-domain incompatibility between an informal expectation and a formal role.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An informal expectation collides with a formal role.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This expectation-axis branch requires identity expectations.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The informal expectation concerns identity.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This expectation-axis branch requires caregiving expectations.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The informal expectation concerns caregiving.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This role-axis branch requires a work role.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The formal role is a work role.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This role-axis branch requires a public role.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The formal role is a public role.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "An informal identity or caregiving expectation collides with a formal work or public role.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "informal expectation collides with formal role", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P094-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Both conflicting roles can be formal.", "slug": "role_conflict"}], "residual_id": "r:role_expectation_conflict_reconciliation:b058_a04_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b058_a04_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "### Map actors, roles, and expectation sources. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Informal identity or caregiving expectations collide with formal work or public roles.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Informal identity or caregiving expectations collide with formal work or public roles.", "### Map actors, roles, and expectation sources"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Both conflicting roles can be formal.", "slug": "role_conflict"}], "normalized_requirement": "Informal identity or caregiving expectations collide with formal work or public roles.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Informal identity or caregiving expectations collide with formal work or public roles.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 5", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "DISJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Recusal, delegation, sequencing, substitution, or role redesign is possible.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The conflict must have consequences beyond private preference and admit structural choices such as sequencing, delegation, recusal, substitution, added capacity, or role release. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: Recusal, delegation, sequencing, substitution, or role redesign is possible. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Recusal, delegation, sequencing, substitution, or role redesign is possible.", "The conflict must have consequences beyond private preference and admit structural choices such as sequencing, delegation, recusal, substitution, added capacity, or role release."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Recusal, delegation, sequencing, substitution, or role redesign is possible."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 58, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-058", "ledger_sha256": "310544d61131a17d0ef39e8022c663e9b6fde54ff865eb7a7312fcc9450d943a"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Role-Scoped Disclosure Minimization", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:role_scoped_disclosure_minimization", "slug": "role_scoped_disclosure_minimization"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A producer holds a record, context, dataset, case file, event payload, credential, or narrative account that contains more information than a consumer needs. Granting the consumer direct access, a full copy, or an overbroad payload solves the immediate coordination need but creates unnecessary privacy exposure, inference risk, misuse opportunity, downstream retention burden, and accountability ambiguity.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A producer holds a record, context, dataset, case file, event payload, credential, or narrative account that contains more information than a consumer needs. Granting the consumer direct access, a full copy, or an overbroad payload solves the immediate coordination need but creates unnecessary privacy exposure, inference risk, misuse opportunity, downstream retention burden, and accountability ambiguity."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime requires a role- and purpose-bounded consumer need for only a subset of a richer source record.", "role_mapping": "Consumer role -> authorized recipient; some information -> necessary subset.", "slug": "minimum_necessary_disclosure", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b058_a05_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The target prime is strongest when the consumer is authorized for a decision or workflow but not for every fact the producer knows. In this condition set, the requirement is: A consumer has a legitimate role-bound need for some information but not the whole source record.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A consumer has a legitimate role-bound need for some information but not the whole source record."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Minimum-Necessary Disclosure", "one_liner": "A producer delivers only the subset of its record a consumer's role requires, stripping the surplus at the source.", "page_ref": "prime:minimum_necessary_disclosure", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Consumer role -> authorized recipient; some information -> necessary subset.", "slug": "minimum_necessary_disclosure", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime requires a role- and purpose-bounded consumer need for only a subset of a richer source record."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A consumer has a legitimate role-bound need for some information but not the whole source record.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Producer-side projection, redaction, summarization, or certification before release is the defining move.", "role_mapping": "Producer transform -> boundary minimization; subset -> disclosed view.", "slug": "minimum_necessary_disclosure", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b058_a05_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "If only the consumer can interpret what is relevant, a governed request/response or review process is needed first. In this condition set, the requirement is: The producer can determine, transform, redact, summarize, or certify the required subset before disclosure.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The producer can determine, transform, redact, summarize, or certify the required subset before disclosure."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Minimum-Necessary Disclosure", "one_liner": "A producer delivers only the subset of its record a consumer's role requires, stripping the surplus at the source.", "page_ref": "prime:minimum_necessary_disclosure", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Producer transform -> boundary minimization; subset -> disclosed view.", "slug": "minimum_necessary_disclosure", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Producer-side projection, redaction, summarization, or certification before release is the defining move."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The producer can determine, transform, redact, summarize, or certify the required subset before disclosure.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime exists because surplus fields create privacy, security, fairness, or strategic risk without advancing purpose.", "role_mapping": "Surplus -> nonnecessary fields; risk -> disclosure externality.", "slug": "minimum_necessary_disclosure", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b058_a05_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The pattern is not about aesthetic brevity; it protects against unnecessary propagation. In this condition set, the requirement is: Surplus information would create privacy, security, reputational, fairness, legal, or strategic risk.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Surplus information would create privacy, security, reputational, fairness, legal, or strategic risk."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Minimum-Necessary Disclosure", "one_liner": "A producer delivers only the subset of its record a consumer's role requires, stripping the surplus at the source.", "page_ref": "prime:minimum_necessary_disclosure", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Surplus -> nonnecessary fields; risk -> disclosure externality.", "slug": "minimum_necessary_disclosure", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime exists because surplus fields create privacy, security, fairness, or strategic risk without advancing purpose."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Surplus information would create privacy, security, reputational, fairness, legal, or strategic risk.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Disclosure crosses the producer boundary and creates recipient knowledge that cannot be reliably revoked.", "role_mapping": "Outside copy -> propagated information; producer boundary -> minimization point.", "slug": "minimum_necessary_disclosure", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b058_a05_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Once information crosses the boundary, later deletion, correction, or purpose limitation becomes harder. In this condition set, the requirement is: Disclosure creates a copy or memory outside the producer boundary.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Disclosure creates a copy or memory outside the producer boundary."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Minimum-Necessary Disclosure", "one_liner": "A producer delivers only the subset of its record a consumer's role requires, stripping the surplus at the source.", "page_ref": "prime:minimum_necessary_disclosure", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Outside copy -> propagated information; producer boundary -> minimization point.", "slug": "minimum_necessary_disclosure", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Disclosure crosses the producer boundary and creates recipient knowledge that cannot be reliably revoked."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Disclosure creates a copy or memory outside the producer boundary.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "One fixed consumer role and purpose is sufficient for the prime.", "slug": "minimum_necessary_disclosure"}], "residual_id": "r:role_scoped_disclosure_minimization:b058_a05_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b058_a05_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The minimum view is contextual rather than universal. In this condition set, the requirement is: Consumer roles vary by purpose, time, risk tier, jurisdiction, or task stage.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Consumer roles vary by purpose, time, risk tier, jurisdiction, or task stage."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "One fixed consumer role and purpose is sufficient for the prime.", "slug": "minimum_necessary_disclosure"}], "normalized_requirement": "Consumer roles vary by purpose, time, risk tier, jurisdiction, or task stage.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Consumer roles vary by purpose, time, risk tier, jurisdiction, or task stage.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P094-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"], ["O1", "O3"], ["O1", "O4"], ["O1", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve leakage possibility and surplus meaning.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An indirect signal can reveal meaning beyond the intended disclosure.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires metadata as the channel.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The leaking signal is metadata.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires timing as the channel.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The leaking signal is timing.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires absence as the channel.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The leaking signal is absence.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires aggregation as the channel.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The leaking signal is aggregation.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Metadata, timing, absence, or aggregation can leak meaning beyond the intended disclosure.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "indirect signal can leak surplus meaning", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P094-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A disclosed subset may have no meaningful side-channel leakage.", "slug": "minimum_necessary_disclosure"}], "residual_id": "r:role_scoped_disclosure_minimization:b058_a05_c7", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b058_a05_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Minimum disclosure includes side-channel and inference review, not just field redaction. In this condition set, the requirement is: Metadata, timing, absence, or aggregation can leak surplus meaning.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Metadata, timing, absence, or aggregation can leak surplus meaning."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "With the over-specificity guard true, a descriptor that does not reveal surplus source identity would contradict the exact record's named breach mode.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "On Background", "one_liner": "The middle attribution tier where a claim may be published but the source is named only by a generic class descriptor — separating evidentiary content from source identity, with descriptor granularity a tunable knob trading warrant against identifiability.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:on_background", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "overspecific_descriptor_identifies_source", "predicate": "The class descriptor is over-specific enough to identify the shielded source.", "rationale": "The candidate supplies the principal spine and one candidate-anchored atomic context qualifier completes a DNF branch without laundering roles or relations."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "on_background"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "overspecific_descriptor_identifies_source"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "on_background", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P094-C12-U1", "why_it_fits": "One candidate-anchored context fact selects the record's over-specific-descriptor breach; it fills O1 while the attribution descriptor directly supplies the metadata branch."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Metadata, timing, absence, or aggregation can leak surplus meaning.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Auditability matters.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The producer must be able to explain why each element was or was not released. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: Auditability matters. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Auditability matters.", "The producer must be able to explain why each element was or was not released."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Auditability matters."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 58, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-058", "ledger_sha256": "310544d61131a17d0ef39e8022c663e9b6fde54ff865eb7a7312fcc9450d943a"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Round-Trip Code Alignment", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:round_trip_code_alignment", "slug": "round_trip_code_alignment"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system transforms content into a transmissible or storable code and later tries to recover it, but the encoder, decoder, scheme, version, channel assumptions, or loss expectations are not aligned. The receiver obtains something syntactically decodable yet semantically incomplete, ambiguous, stale, lossy beyond tolerance, or unsafe to act on.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system transforms content into a transmissible or storable code and later tries to recover it, but the encoder, decoder, scheme, version, channel assumptions, or loss expectations are not aligned. The receiver obtains something syntactically decodable yet semantically incomplete, ambiguous, stale, lossy beyond tolerance, or unsafe to act on."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Encoding exists to carry content across a medium, distance, time, or abstraction boundary.", "role_mapping": "Content -> source symbols; boundary -> channel.", "slug": "encoding_and_decoding", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b058_a06_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A process must move content across time, distance, media, organizations, tools, languages, modalities, or abstraction levels. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A process must move content across time, distance, media, organizations, tools, languages, modalities, or abstraction levels."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Encoding And Decoding", "one_liner": "The paired transformation by which content is converted into a transmissible code by an encoder and recovered from it by a decoder, with faithful round-trip conditional on a shared scheme.", "page_ref": "prime:encoding_and_decoding", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Content -> source symbols; boundary -> channel.", "slug": "encoding_and_decoding", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Encoding exists to carry content across a medium, distance, time, or abstraction boundary."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A process must move content across time, distance, media, organizations, tools, languages, modalities, or abstraction levels.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact pattern transforms source content into an intermediate code and maps it back through a decoder.", "role_mapping": "Code or record -> encoded representation; source -> content.", "slug": "encoding_and_decoding", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b058_a06_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system transforms content into a transmissible or storable code and later tries to recover it, but the encoder, decoder, scheme, version, channel assumptions, or loss expectations are not aligned. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The content cannot be carried directly and must be transformed into a code, notation, record, message, file, label, diagram, summary, translation, or other intermediate form.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The content cannot be carried directly and must be transformed into a code, notation, record, message, file, label, diagram, summary, translation, or other intermediate form.", "A system transforms content into a transmissible or storable code and later tries to recover it, but the encoder, decoder, scheme, version, channel assumptions, or loss expectations are not aligned."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Encoding And Decoding", "one_liner": "The paired transformation by which content is converted into a transmissible code by an encoder and recovered from it by a decoder, with faithful round-trip conditional on a shared scheme.", "page_ref": "prime:encoding_and_decoding", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Code or record -> encoded representation; source -> content.", "slug": "encoding_and_decoding", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact pattern transforms source content into an intermediate code and maps it back through a decoder."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The content cannot be carried directly and must be transformed into a code, notation, record, message, file, label, diagram, summary, translation, or other intermediate form.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A shared codebook must preserve the distinctions the receiver is expected to recover.", "role_mapping": "Required distinctions -> symbol distinctions; receiver -> decoder.", "slug": "encoding_and_decoding", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b058_a06_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The shortcut is to treat the code as self-explanatory; the discipline is to design the whole round trip. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The receiver needs specific distinctions, invariants, units, authority markers, context, or ordering to survive the round trip.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The receiver needs specific distinctions, invariants, units, authority markers, context, or ordering to survive the round trip.", "The shortcut is to treat the code as self-explanatory; the discipline is to design the whole round trip."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Encoding And Decoding", "one_liner": "The paired transformation by which content is converted into a transmissible code by an encoder and recovered from it by a decoder, with faithful round-trip conditional on a shared scheme.", "page_ref": "prime:encoding_and_decoding", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Required distinctions -> symbol distinctions; receiver -> decoder.", "slug": "encoding_and_decoding", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A shared codebook must preserve the distinctions the receiver is expected to recover."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The receiver needs specific distinctions, invariants, units, authority markers, context, or ordering to survive the round trip.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Different parties, tools, or future versions may implement the encoder and decoder independently.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system transforms content into a transmissible or storable code and later tries to recover it, but the encoder, decoder, scheme, version, channel assumptions, or loss expectations are not aligned. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Different parties, tools, or future versions may implement the encoder and decoder independently. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Different parties, tools, or future versions may implement the encoder and decoder independently.", "A system transforms content into a transmissible or storable code and later tries to recover it, but the encoder, decoder, scheme, version, channel assumptions, or loss expectations are not aligned."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Different parties, tools, or future versions may implement the encoder and decoder independently."}, {"display_text": "Lossy transformation is allowed only if the loss is explicit, bounded, and appropriate to the downstream decision.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this deployment constraint: Lossy transformation is allowed only if the loss is explicit, bounded, and appropriate to the downstream decision. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Lossy transformation is allowed only if the loss is explicit, bounded, and appropriate to the downstream decision."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Lossy transformation is allowed only if the loss is explicit, bounded, and appropriate to the downstream decision."}, {"display_text": "Malformed, unknown, ambiguous, or unsupported code states must be handled safely rather than guessed into meaning.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this deployment constraint: Malformed, unknown, ambiguous, or unsupported code states must be handled safely rather than guessed into meaning. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Malformed, unknown, ambiguous, or unsupported code states must be handled safely rather than guessed into meaning."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Malformed, unknown, ambiguous, or unsupported code states must be handled safely rather than guessed into meaning."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 58, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-058", "ledger_sha256": "310544d61131a17d0ef39e8022c663e9b6fde54ff865eb7a7312fcc9450d943a"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Round-Trip Serialization Contract", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:round_trip_serialization_contract", "slug": "round_trip_serialization_contract"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 5, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Structured content is bound to a local environment, memory layout, object graph, database, document model, or live interface that cannot be directly stored, transmitted, compared, signed, replayed, archived, or reconstructed by another actor. If the content is flattened informally, receivers lose types, order, references, identity, context, or version meaning and must guess how to rebuild it.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Structured content is bound to a local environment, memory layout, object graph, database, document model, or live interface that cannot be directly stored, transmitted, compared, signed, replayed, archived, or reconstructed by another actor. If the content is flattened informally, receivers lose types, order, references, identity, context, or version meaning and must guess how to rebuild it."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime flattens structured state for transport across wire, disk, queue, archive, or API.", "role_mapping": "Structure -> object; medium -> transport boundary.", "slug": "serialization", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b058_a07_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A structure must cross a medium boundary such as wire, disk, queue, archive, clipboard, report, API, or long-term record. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A structure must cross a medium boundary such as wire, disk, queue, archive, clipboard, report, API, or long-term record."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Serialization", "one_liner": "Convert structured content into a flat, transportable form that reconstructs.", "page_ref": "prime:serialization", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Structure -> object; medium -> transport boundary.", "slug": "serialization", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime flattens structured state for transport across wire, disk, queue, archive, or API."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A structure must cross a medium boundary such as wire, disk, queue, archive, clipboard, report, API, or long-term record.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Serialization is distinguished from human description by reconstruction of structured state at the receiver.", "role_mapping": "Receiver reconstruction -> deserialization; structure -> recovered object.", "slug": "serialization", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b058_a07_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The receiver must reconstruct a structure, not merely read a human-facing description. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The receiver must reconstruct a structure, not merely read a human-facing description."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Serialization", "one_liner": "Convert structured content into a flat, transportable form that reconstructs.", "page_ref": "prime:serialization", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Receiver reconstruction -> deserialization; structure -> recovered object.", "slug": "serialization", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Serialization is distinguished from human description by reconstruction of structured state at the receiver."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The receiver must reconstruct a structure, not merely read a human-facing description.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Pointers, live handles, and ambient defaults must be replaced by self-contained values or references.", "role_mapping": "Ambient state -> nonportable relationship; payload -> self-contained form.", "slug": "serialization", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b058_a07_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Structured content is bound to a local environment, memory layout, object graph, database, document model, or live interface that cannot be directly stored, transmitted, compared, signed, replayed, archived, or reconstructed by another actor. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Pointers, ambient state, live handles, local defaults, or implicit object relationships cannot travel with the content.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Pointers, ambient state, live handles, local defaults, or implicit object relationships cannot travel with the content.", "Structured content is bound to a local environment, memory layout, object graph, database, document model, or live interface that cannot be directly stored, transmitted, compared, signed, replayed, archived, or reconstructed by another actor."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Serialization", "one_liner": "Convert structured content into a flat, transportable form that reconstructs.", "page_ref": "prime:serialization", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Ambient state -> nonportable relationship; payload -> self-contained form.", "slug": "serialization", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Pointers, live handles, and ambient defaults must be replaced by self-contained values or references."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Pointers, ambient state, live handles, local defaults, or implicit object relationships cannot travel with the content.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A common flat representation coordinates multiple producers and consumers of structured state.", "role_mapping": "Producers and consumers -> serializers/deserializers; flat state -> payload.", "slug": "serialization", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b058_a07_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Multiple producers or consumers need a common flat representation of structured state. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Multiple producers or consumers need a common flat representation of structured state."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Serialization", "one_liner": "Convert structured content into a flat, transportable form that reconstructs.", "page_ref": "prime:serialization", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Producers and consumers -> serializers/deserializers; flat state -> payload.", "slug": "serialization", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A common flat representation coordinates multiple producers and consumers of structured state."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Multiple producers or consumers need a common flat representation of structured state.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Round-trip fidelity and deterministic replay are the central contract of serialization.", "role_mapping": "Round trip -> serialize/deserialize; fidelity -> equivalence.", "slug": "serialization", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b058_a07_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Round-trip fidelity, replayability, auditability, or deterministic comparison matters. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Round-trip fidelity, replayability, auditability, or deterministic comparison matters."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Serialization", "one_liner": "Convert structured content into a flat, transportable form that reconstructs.", "page_ref": "prime:serialization", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Round trip -> serialize/deserialize; fidelity -> equivalence.", "slug": "serialization", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Round-trip fidelity and deterministic replay are the central contract of serialization."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Round-trip fidelity, replayability, auditability, or deterministic comparison matters.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Schema evolution or long-term compatibility must be handled without corrupting old or new payloads.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this deployment constraint: Schema evolution or long-term compatibility must be handled without corrupting old or new payloads. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Schema evolution or long-term compatibility must be handled without corrupting old or new payloads."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Schema evolution or long-term compatibility must be handled without corrupting old or new payloads."}, {"display_text": "Security, validation, or trust boundaries make uncontrolled parsing or implicit reconstruction unsafe.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this deployment constraint: Security, validation, or trust boundaries make uncontrolled parsing or implicit reconstruction unsafe. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Security, validation, or trust boundaries make uncontrolled parsing or implicit reconstruction unsafe."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "Security, validation, or trust boundaries make uncontrolled parsing or implicit reconstruction unsafe."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 58, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-058", "ledger_sha256": "310544d61131a17d0ef39e8022c663e9b6fde54ff865eb7a7312fcc9450d943a"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Rupture Containment", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:rupture_containment", "slug": "rupture_containment"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 5, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A rupture is rarely only a local event. It travels through seams, dependencies, relationships, flows, trust, obligations, shared infrastructure, or shared meaning. The structural problem is that the broken part remains coupled to unbroken parts.\n\nWithout containment, the system may overreact with total shutdown or underreact by focusing only on the visible break. Both are dangerous. Total shutdown creates unnecessary collateral damage; narrow repair lets propagation continue through hidden paths.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A component, relationship, structure, or process has ruptured or is about to rupture, and damage may propagate into adjacent systems."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Containment begins from a harmful agent, breach, or disturbance whose spread must be bounded.", "role_mapping": "Rupture -> contained harmful process; local zone -> source.", "slug": "containment", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b058_a08_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A local failure can become a cascade; a breach can become a system compromise; a conflict can become a feud; a crack can become structural failure; a loss can become panic; a trust rupture can become legitimacy collapse. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A break, breach, fracture, conflict, overload, contamination, compromise, or trust failure has already occurred or is no longer realistically avoidable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A break, breach, fracture, conflict, overload, contamination, compromise, or trust failure has already occurred or is no longer realistically avoidable.", "A local failure can become a cascade; a breach can become a system compromise; a conflict can become a feud; a crack can become structural failure; a loss can become panic; a trust rupture can become legitimacy collapse."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Containment", "one_liner": "Holding a hazard, process, or agent within a deliberately maintained perimeter to prevent its spread or uncontrolled interaction with the surroundings.", "page_ref": "prime:containment", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Rupture -> contained harmful process; local zone -> source.", "slug": "containment", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Containment begins from a harmful agent, breach, or disturbance whose spread must be bounded."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A break, breach, fracture, conflict, overload, contamination, compromise, or trust failure has already occurred or is no longer realistically avoidable.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact pattern requires pathways through which the harmful state could escape into adjacent regions.", "role_mapping": "Dependencies and channels -> propagation pathways.", "slug": "containment", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b058_a08_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It travels through seams, dependencies, relationships, flows, trust, obligations, shared infrastructure, or shared meaning. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The rupture is connected to other parts of the system through physical continuity, dependencies, communication channels, obligations, incentives, shared resources, reputation, or load transfer.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The rupture is connected to other parts of the system through physical continuity, dependencies, communication channels, obligations, incentives, shared resources, reputation, or load transfer.", "It travels through seams, dependencies, relationships, flows, trust, obligations, shared infrastructure, or shared meaning."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Containment", "one_liner": "Holding a hazard, process, or agent within a deliberately maintained perimeter to prevent its spread or uncontrolled interaction with the surroundings.", "page_ref": "prime:containment", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Dependencies and channels -> propagation pathways.", "slug": "containment", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact pattern requires pathways through which the harmful state could escape into adjacent regions."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The rupture is connected to other parts of the system through physical continuity, dependencies, communication channels, obligations, incentives, shared resources, reputation, or load transfer.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Containment is warranted because propagated harm exceeds the cost of isolating the local zone.", "role_mapping": "Propagation cost -> spread harm; local damage -> bounded loss.", "slug": "containment", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b058_a08_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Total shutdown creates unnecessary collateral damage; narrow repair lets propagation continue through hidden paths. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Damage propagation would be more costly, dangerous, or legitimacy-damaging than local damage alone.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Damage propagation would be more costly, dangerous, or legitimacy-damaging than local damage alone.", "Total shutdown creates unnecessary collateral damage; narrow repair lets propagation continue through hidden paths."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Containment", "one_liner": "Holding a hazard, process, or agent within a deliberately maintained perimeter to prevent its spread or uncontrolled interaction with the surroundings.", "page_ref": "prime:containment", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Propagation cost -> spread harm; local damage -> bounded loss.", "slug": "containment", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Containment is warranted because propagated harm exceeds the cost of isolating the local zone."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Damage propagation would be more costly, dangerous, or legitimacy-damaging than local damage alone.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A definable boundary and actionable routes are mandatory to interrupt spread.", "role_mapping": "Temporary perimeter -> containment boundary; routes -> controlled pathways.", "slug": "containment", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b058_a08_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use Rupture Containment when a break is active, imminent, or unavoidable and the largest danger is propagation. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The system can define a temporary containment boundary and can act on at least some propagation routes.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The system can define a temporary containment boundary and can act on at least some propagation routes.", "Use Rupture Containment when a break is active, imminent, or unavoidable and the largest danger is propagation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Containment", "one_liner": "Holding a hazard, process, or agent within a deliberately maintained perimeter to prevent its spread or uncontrolled interaction with the surroundings.", "page_ref": "prime:containment", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Temporary perimeter -> containment boundary; routes -> controlled pathways.", "slug": "containment", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A definable boundary and actionable routes are mandatory to interrupt spread."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The system can define a temporary containment boundary and can act on at least some propagation routes.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The pattern protects the unaffected exterior while the contained interior is isolated.", "role_mapping": "Adjacent function -> protected exterior; rupture zone -> interior.", "slug": "containment", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b058_a08_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A component, relationship, structure, or process has ruptured or is about to rupture, and damage may propagate into adjacent systems. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Essential adjacent functions, relationships, flows, or people need protection while the rupture zone is isolated or stabilized.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Essential adjacent functions, relationships, flows, or people need protection while the rupture zone is isolated or stabilized.", "A component, relationship, structure, or process has ruptured or is about to rupture, and damage may propagate into adjacent systems."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Containment", "one_liner": "Holding a hazard, process, or agent within a deliberately maintained perimeter to prevent its spread or uncontrolled interaction with the surroundings.", "page_ref": "prime:containment", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Adjacent function -> protected exterior; rupture zone -> interior.", "slug": "containment", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The pattern protects the unaffected exterior while the contained interior is isolated."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Essential adjacent functions, relationships, flows, or people need protection while the rupture zone is isolated or stabilized.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Immediate repair is not possible, not yet safe, or would spread damage if attempted before stabilization.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when immediate full repair would be unsafe, slow, or impossible. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Immediate repair is not possible, not yet safe, or would spread damage if attempted before stabilization. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Immediate repair is not possible, not yet safe, or would spread damage if attempted before stabilization.", "It is especially useful when immediate full repair would be unsafe, slow, or impossible."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Immediate repair is not possible, not yet safe, or would spread damage if attempted before stabilization."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 58, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-058", "ledger_sha256": "310544d61131a17d0ef39e8022c663e9b6fde54ff865eb7a7312fcc9450d943a"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Sacred Boundary Stewardship", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:sacred_boundary_stewardship", "slug": "sacred_boundary_stewardship"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Something has been treated as ordinary when it carries sacred force, or treated as sacred without explicit rules for access, change, exception, disagreement, and repair. The result is desecration, exclusion, authority abuse, brittle taboo, symbolic conflict, or loss of legitimacy.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Something has been treated as ordinary when it carries sacred force, or treated as sacred without explicit rules for access, change, exception, disagreement, and repair. The result is desecration, exclusion, authority abuse, brittle taboo, symbolic conflict, or loss of legitimacy."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime distinguishes something set apart, inviolable, or beyond ordinary exchange.", "role_mapping": "Named object or value -> sacred referent; not for sale -> separation.", "slug": "sacred", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b058_a09_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Something has been treated as ordinary when it carries sacred force, or treated as sacred without explicit rules for access, change, exception, disagreement, and repair. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A place, object, value, office, text, body, memory, or symbol is described as inviolable, untouchable, holy, sacred, not for sale, not negotiable, or beyond ordinary use.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A place, object, value, office, text, body, memory, or symbol is described as inviolable, untouchable, holy, sacred, not for sale, not negotiable, or beyond ordinary use.", "Something has been treated as ordinary when it carries sacred force, or treated as sacred without explicit rules for access, change, exception, disagreement, and repair."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Sacred", "one_liner": "Things set apart as inviolable and demanding reverence.", "page_ref": "prime:sacred", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Named object or value -> sacred referent; not for sale -> separation.", "slug": "sacred", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime distinguishes something set apart, inviolable, or beyond ordinary exchange."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A place, object, value, office, text, body, memory, or symbol is described as inviolable, untouchable, holy, sacred, not for sale, not negotiable, or beyond ordinary use.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Desecration or commercialization of a sacred referent necessarily produces symbolic rather than merely instrumental harm.", "role_mapping": "Violation -> boundary breach; symbolic harm -> sacred meaning.", "slug": "sacred", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b058_a09_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Violation, mockery, commercialization, appropriation, or neglect would create symbolic harm. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Violation, mockery, commercialization, appropriation, or neglect would create symbolic harm."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Sacred", "one_liner": "Things set apart as inviolable and demanding reverence.", "page_ref": "prime:sacred", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Violation -> boundary breach; symbolic harm -> sacred meaning.", "slug": "sacred", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Desecration or commercialization of a sacred referent necessarily produces symbolic rather than merely instrumental harm."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Violation, mockery, commercialization, appropriation, or neglect would create symbolic harm.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P094-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a cross-group distinction-setting context.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "At least two groups participate in defining a sacred/profane distinction.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve an active revision process rather than a settled boundary.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The distinction is undergoing renegotiation.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve power asymmetry across the groups.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The participating groups have unequal power.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Groups with unequal power are renegotiating a sacred/profane distinction.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "unequally powered groups renegotiate sacred boundary", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P094-C13-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A sacred/profane distinction can remain stable across equal-status participants.", "slug": "sacred"}], "residual_id": "r:sacred_boundary_stewardship:b058_a09_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b058_a09_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A sacred/profane distinction is being renegotiated across groups with unequal power. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A sacred/profane distinction is being renegotiated across groups with unequal power."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A sacred/profane distinction can remain stable across equal-status participants.", "slug": "sacred"}], "normalized_requirement": "A sacred/profane distinction is being renegotiated across groups with unequal power.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A sacred/profane distinction is being renegotiated across groups with unequal power.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "People disagree about whether approach, critique, display, tradeoff, alteration, or disposal is permitted.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: People disagree about whether approach, critique, display, tradeoff, alteration, or disposal is permitted. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["People disagree about whether approach, critique, display, tradeoff, alteration, or disposal is permitted."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "People disagree about whether approach, critique, display, tradeoff, alteration, or disposal is permitted."}, {"display_text": "A practical emergency or plural-values conflict tests whether sacred status has exceptions.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Sacred status protects meaning by setting something apart, but social systems still need access, interpretation, adaptation, conflict resolution, and repair. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: A practical emergency or plural-values conflict tests whether sacred status has exceptions. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A practical emergency or plural-values conflict tests whether sacred status has exceptions.", "Sacred status protects meaning by setting something apart, but social systems still need access, interpretation, adaptation, conflict resolution, and repair."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "A practical emergency or plural-values conflict tests whether sacred status has exceptions."}, {"display_text": "An institution needs to preserve reverence without suppressing legitimate critique or access.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The boundary must be strong enough to preserve reverence and accountable enough not to become arbitrary power. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: An institution needs to preserve reverence without suppressing legitimate critique or access. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["An institution needs to preserve reverence without suppressing legitimate critique or access.", "The boundary must be strong enough to preserve reverence and accountable enough not to become arbitrary power."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "An institution needs to preserve reverence without suppressing legitimate critique or access."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 58, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-058", "ledger_sha256": "310544d61131a17d0ef39e8022c663e9b6fde54ff865eb7a7312fcc9450d943a"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Sacred Object or Totem Introduction", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:sacred_object_or_totem_introduction", "slug": "sacred_object_or_totem_introduction"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 2 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 2}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A group seeks shared identity, memory, reverence, commitment, or emotional convergence, but the shared meaning remains too abstract, dispersed, invisible, or unstable to become a durable collective focus.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A group seeks shared identity, memory, reverence, commitment, or emotional convergence, but the shared meaning remains too abstract, dispersed, invisible, or unstable to become a durable collective focus."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P094-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a collective setting of the named or equivalent kind.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A group, cohort, community, organization, ceremony, movement, memorial, team, or equivalent collective setting is involved.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a need for a concrete anchor, not merely the anchor's possible existence.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The collective setting needs a concrete anchor.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires belonging as the anchor's function.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The concrete anchor supports belonging.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires shared memory as the anchor's function.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The concrete anchor supports shared memory.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "A collective setting needs a concrete anchor for belonging or shared memory.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "collective setting needs concrete symbolic anchor", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P094-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A sacred referent can be an abstract value or text and need not answer a group's need for a new anchor.", "slug": "sacred"}], "residual_id": "r:sacred_object_or_totem_introduction:b058_a10_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b058_a10_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A group seeks shared identity, memory, reverence, commitment, or emotional convergence, but the shared meaning remains too abstract, dispersed, invisible, or unstable to become a durable collective focus. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A group, cohort, community, organization, ceremony, movement, memorial, or team needs a concrete anchor for belonging or shared memory.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A group, cohort, community, organization, ceremony, movement, memorial, or team needs a concrete anchor for belonging or shared memory.", "A group seeks shared identity, memory, reverence, commitment, or emotional convergence, but the shared meaning remains too abstract, dispersed, invisible, or unstable to become a durable collective focus."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A sacred referent can be an abstract value or text and need not answer a group's need for a new anchor.", "slug": "sacred"}], "normalized_requirement": "A group, cohort, community, organization, ceremony, movement, memorial, or team needs a concrete anchor for belonging or shared memory.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A group, cohort, community, organization, ceremony, movement, memorial, or team needs a concrete anchor for belonging or shared memory.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Sacred meaning can be carried successfully by language and practice without any insufficiency.", "slug": "sacred"}], "residual_id": "r:sacred_object_or_totem_introduction:b058_a10_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b058_a10_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A group seeks shared identity, memory, reverence, commitment, or emotional convergence, but the shared meaning remains too abstract, dispersed, invisible, or unstable to become a durable collective focus. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Existing language, slogans, roles, or meetings are not enough to focus collective attention or emotional energy.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Existing language, slogans, roles, or meetings are not enough to focus collective attention or emotional energy.", "A group seeks shared identity, memory, reverence, commitment, or emotional convergence, but the shared meaning remains too abstract, dispersed, invisible, or unstable to become a durable collective focus."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Sacred meaning can be carried successfully by language and practice without any insufficiency.", "slug": "sacred"}], "normalized_requirement": "Existing language, slogans, roles, or meetings are not enough to focus collective attention or emotional energy.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Existing language, slogans, roles, or meetings are not enough to focus collective attention or emotional energy.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A material artifact, emblem, token, digital object, site marker, or designed symbol can plausibly embody the shared meaning.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A group seeks shared identity, memory, reverence, commitment, or emotional convergence, but the shared meaning remains too abstract, dispersed, invisible, or unstable to become a durable collective focus. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: A material artifact, emblem, token, digital object, site marker, or designed symbol can plausibly embody the shared meaning. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A material artifact, emblem, token, digital object, site marker, or designed symbol can plausibly embody the shared meaning.", "A group seeks shared identity, memory, reverence, commitment, or emotional convergence, but the shared meaning remains too abstract, dispersed, invisible, or unstable to become a durable collective focus."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "A material artifact, emblem, token, digital object, site marker, or designed symbol can plausibly embody the shared meaning."}, {"display_text": "The group needs continuity across time, membership turnover, distributed sites, or repeated gatherings.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The group needs continuity across time, membership turnover, distributed sites, or repeated gatherings. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The group needs continuity across time, membership turnover, distributed sites, or repeated gatherings."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The group needs continuity across time, membership turnover, distributed sites, or repeated gatherings."}, {"display_text": "Symbolic focus is already emerging informally and needs governance before it becomes exclusionary, trivialized, appropriated, or factional.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A group seeks shared identity, memory, reverence, commitment, or emotional convergence, but the shared meaning remains too abstract, dispersed, invisible, or unstable to become a durable collective focus. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Symbolic focus is already emerging informally and needs governance before it becomes exclusionary, trivialized, appropriated, or factional. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Symbolic focus is already emerging informally and needs governance before it becomes exclusionary, trivialized, appropriated, or factional.", "A group seeks shared identity, memory, reverence, commitment, or emotional convergence, but the shared meaning remains too abstract, dispersed, invisible, or unstable to become a durable collective focus."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Symbolic focus is already emerging informally and needs governance before it becomes exclusionary, trivialized, appropriated, or factional."}, {"display_text": "The group can define handling, access, interpretation, custody, and retirement rules rather than treating the object as self-explanatory.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: The group can define handling, access, interpretation, custody, and retirement rules rather than treating the object as self-explanatory. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The group can define handling, access, interpretation, custody, and retirement rules rather than treating the object as self-explanatory."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The group can define handling, access, interpretation, custody, and retirement rules rather than treating the object as self-explanatory."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 58, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-058", "ledger_sha256": "310544d61131a17d0ef39e8022c663e9b6fde54ff865eb7a7312fcc9450d943a"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Sacrificial Geometry Preparation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:sacrificial_geometry_preparation", "slug": "sacrificial_geometry_preparation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 2 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 2}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The final geometry lacks the local section, support, thermal capacity, or workholding\narea needed to survive the operation that creates one of its features. Strengthening\nthe finished object permanently adds unwanted mass or shape, while repairing the\ndamage afterward accepts uncontrolled propagation.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "The final geometry lacks the local support, section, thermal capacity, or workholding area needed to survive the operation that creates one of its features."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "This branch preserves the complete remedy-free diagnostic route; goals, feasibility clauses, gates, deployment constraints, and supporting context remain outside the DNF."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "EXT001-C090", "dnf": [["EXT001-U090-O1"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"obligation_id": "EXT001-U090-O1", "predicate": "The final geometry cannot safely survive the destructive or high-load operation required to create a feature."}], "predicate": "The final geometry cannot safely survive the destructive or high-load operation required to create a feature.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "The final geometry cannot safely survive the destructive or high-load operation required to create a feature.", "unit_id": "EXT001-U090"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"catalog_exhaustion": "CONDITION_LEVEL", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The final geometry cannot safely survive the destructive or high-load operation required to create a feature.", "slug": "robustness"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The final geometry cannot safely survive the destructive or high-load operation required to create a feature.", "slug": "fracture_toughness"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The final geometry cannot safely survive the destructive or high-load operation required to create a feature.", "slug": "margin_of_safety"}], "residual_id": "EXT001:sacrificial_geometry_preparation:C01", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding."}}, "condition_id": "ext001_sacrificial_geometry_preparation_a01", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: The final geometry cannot safely survive the destructive or high-load operation required to create a feature.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The final geometry cannot safely survive the destructive or high-load operation required to create a feature."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The final geometry cannot safely survive the destructive or high-load operation required to create a feature.", "slug": "robustness"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The final geometry cannot safely survive the destructive or high-load operation required to create a feature.", "slug": "fracture_toughness"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: The final geometry cannot safely survive the destructive or high-load operation required to create a feature.", "slug": "margin_of_safety"}], "normalized_requirement": "The final geometry cannot safely survive the destructive or high-load operation required to create a feature.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The final geometry cannot safely survive the destructive or high-load operation required to create a feature.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "EXT001-C091", "dnf": [["EXT001-U091-O1"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"obligation_id": "EXT001-U091-O1", "predicate": "Permanent strengthening would add unacceptable mass, shape, or material."}], "predicate": "Permanent strengthening would add unacceptable mass, shape, or material.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Permanent strengthening would add unacceptable mass, shape, or material.", "unit_id": "EXT001-U091"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"catalog_exhaustion": "CONDITION_LEVEL", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Permanent strengthening would add unacceptable mass, shape, or material.", "slug": "premature_optimization"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Permanent strengthening would add unacceptable mass, shape, or material.", "slug": "stress_rupture"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Permanent strengthening would add unacceptable mass, shape, or material.", "slug": "dissonance"}], "residual_id": "EXT001:sacrificial_geometry_preparation:C02", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding."}}, "condition_id": "ext001_sacrificial_geometry_preparation_a02", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: Permanent strengthening would add unacceptable mass, shape, or material.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Permanent strengthening would add unacceptable mass, shape, or material."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Permanent strengthening would add unacceptable mass, shape, or material.", "slug": "premature_optimization"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Permanent strengthening would add unacceptable mass, shape, or material.", "slug": "stress_rupture"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Permanent strengthening would add unacceptable mass, shape, or material.", "slug": "dissonance"}], "normalized_requirement": "Permanent strengthening would add unacceptable mass, shape, or material.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Permanent strengthening would add unacceptable mass, shape, or material.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Temporary sacrificial geometry can support the operation and later be removed.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: Temporary sacrificial geometry can support the operation and later be removed. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Temporary sacrificial geometry can support the operation and later be removed.", "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Temporary sacrificial geometry can support the operation and later be removed."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"candidate_ledger_sha256": "96f72d2139077fd57bf795048ebef33b3fd574b20963170080ec916b5b3b92fe", "extension_id": "new-archetypes-extension-001", "ledger_id": "prime-production-v1.2-extension-001", "ledger_sha256": "9644520614744632d1d36da44b1acd77ce432852c6083eb871203521c166efce"}, "base_projection_sha256": "841e0c7f3cb8e8054475ad29a8a14745a416b4fc115559a44878b94292e673ec", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "ca09ed9fe1598ce7072755b530de5553f5ee0a7cd64ae82d9e4a4e2149a37788", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Safe Mode Operation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:safe_mode_operation", "slug": "safe_mode_operation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a three-way tension among safety, continuity, and recoverability. The system has lost enough confidence that normal operation is dangerous, but it still needs enough function to understand the failure, preserve critical state, communicate status, or reach a safer condition.\n\nWithout safe mode, operators often face a brittle binary choice: run normally and risk amplifying harm, or shut everything down and lose visibility. That binary can produce unsafe improvisation, hidden degraded states, or pressure-driven premature restoration.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system has entered or may have entered an impaired, uncertain, or hazardous condition. Full operation could amplify harm, corruption, spread, or irreversible action, while total shutdown would make diagnosis, preservation, communication, or controlled recovery too difficult."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A fail-safe can be designed prospectively and need not follow an observed anomaly.", "slug": "fail_safe"}], "residual_id": "r:safe_mode_operation:b058_a11_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b058_a11_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Full operation could amplify harm, corruption, spread, or irreversible action, while total shutdown would make diagnosis, preservation, communication, or controlled recovery too difficult. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Full operation is unsafe or suspect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Full operation is unsafe or suspect", "Full operation could amplify harm, corruption, spread, or irreversible action, while total shutdown would make diagnosis, preservation, communication, or controlled recovery too difficult."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A fail-safe can be designed prospectively and need not follow an observed anomaly.", "slug": "fail_safe"}], "normalized_requirement": "Full operation is unsafe or suspect", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Full operation is unsafe or suspect", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P094-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve total shutdown in the role of a possible safe state.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Total shutdown is considered as a safe-state option.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the negative polarity.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Total shutdown is not the best safe state.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve comparative suboptimality, not merely a flaw in shutdown.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "At least one available safe-state alternative is preferable to total shutdown.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Total shutdown is not the best safe state among available safe-state alternatives.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "total shutdown is suboptimal as safe state", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P094-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A fail-safe may deliberately choose total shutdown as the safest state.", "slug": "fail_safe"}], "residual_id": "r:safe_mode_operation:b058_a11_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b058_a11_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is weak when no continued operation is safe, when restrictions cannot be enforced, or when the organization has no clear owner for exiting the restricted state. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Total shutdown is not the best safe state.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Total shutdown is not the best safe state", "It is weak when no continued operation is safe, when restrictions cannot be enforced, or when the organization has no clear owner for exiting the restricted state."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A fail-safe may deliberately choose total shutdown as the safest state.", "slug": "fail_safe"}], "normalized_requirement": "Total shutdown is not the best safe state", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Total shutdown is not the best safe state", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Some systems have one indivisible function and fail safely only by stopping it.", "slug": "fail_safe"}], "residual_id": "r:safe_mode_operation:b058_a11_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b058_a11_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The key test is whether safe and unsafe capabilities can be separated. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Safe and unsafe capabilities can be separated.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Safe and unsafe capabilities can be separated", "The key test is whether safe and unsafe capabilities can be separated."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Some systems have one indivisible function and fail safely only by stopping it.", "slug": "fail_safe"}], "normalized_requirement": "Safe and unsafe capabilities can be separated", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Safe and unsafe capabilities can be separated", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The restricted state can be enforced.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is weak when no continued operation is safe, when restrictions cannot be enforced, or when the organization has no clear owner for exiting the restricted state. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: The restricted state can be enforced. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The restricted state can be enforced", "It is weak when no continued operation is safe, when restrictions cannot be enforced, or when the organization has no clear owner for exiting the restricted state."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The restricted state can be enforced"}, {"display_text": "Exit criteria can be defined.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: Exit criteria can be defined. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Exit criteria can be defined"]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Exit criteria can be defined"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 58, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-058", "ledger_sha256": "310544d61131a17d0ef39e8022c663e9b6fde54ff865eb7a7312fcc9450d943a"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Safety Margin Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:safety_margin_design", "slug": "safety_margin_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is edge operation under uncertainty. A system may appear efficient because it uses nearly all of its time, capacity, budget, leverage, strength, or inventory. But if it runs too close to a boundary, a normal delay, defect, demand spike, forecast error, or environmental shift can push it into failure.\n\nThis pattern often appears after growth or cost cutting. A reserve that was once real becomes baseline capacity. A schedule buffer becomes expected productivity. A budget contingency becomes ordinary spending. A safety factor is assumed but never revisited after conditions change. The system still believes it has margin, but the margin has already been consumed.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "The system operates near a boundary where ordinary variation, estimation error, wear, demand spikes, drift, delay, or small mistakes can push it into unacceptable failure. The boundary may be known, but the gap between routine operation and that boundary is too small, poorly specified, politically consumed, or invisible until the failure occurs."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A margin of safety is defined relative to a failure, overload, insolvency, or noncompliance boundary.", "role_mapping": "Failure threshold -> boundary; operation -> load.", "slug": "margin_of_safety", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b058_a12_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The boundary may be known, but the gap between routine operation and that boundary is too small, poorly specified, politically consumed, or invisible until the failure occurs. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: There is a meaningful failure boundary, such as overload, insolvency, unsafe dose, structural failure, deadline breach, covenant violation, service collapse, ecological damage, or legal noncompliance.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["There is a meaningful failure boundary, such as overload, insolvency, unsafe dose, structural failure, deadline breach, covenant violation, service collapse, ecological damage, or legal noncompliance.", "The boundary may be known, but the gap between routine operation and that boundary is too small, poorly specified, politically consumed, or invisible until the failure occurs."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Margin of Safety", "one_liner": "Buffer capacity.", "page_ref": "prime:margin_of_safety", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Failure threshold -> boundary; operation -> load.", "slug": "margin_of_safety", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A margin of safety is defined relative to a failure, overload, insolvency, or noncompliance boundary."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "There is a meaningful failure boundary, such as overload, insolvency, unsafe dose, structural failure, deadline breach, covenant violation, service collapse, ecological damage, or legal noncompliance.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime carries headroom specifically to absorb uncertainty and variation in load or capacity.", "role_mapping": "Uncertain exposure -> variation; protected gap -> margin.", "slug": "margin_of_safety", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b058_a12_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The system operates near a boundary where ordinary variation, estimation error, wear, demand spikes, drift, delay, or small mistakes can push it into unacceptable failure. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The expected load, cost, exposure, stress, demand, timing, or variation is uncertain or can change faster than the system can recover.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The expected load, cost, exposure, stress, demand, timing, or variation is uncertain or can change faster than the system can recover.", "The system operates near a boundary where ordinary variation, estimation error, wear, demand spikes, drift, delay, or small mistakes can push it into unacceptable failure."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Margin of Safety", "one_liner": "Buffer capacity.", "page_ref": "prime:margin_of_safety", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Uncertain exposure -> variation; protected gap -> margin.", "slug": "margin_of_safety", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime carries headroom specifically to absorb uncertainty and variation in load or capacity."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The expected load, cost, exposure, stress, demand, timing, or variation is uncertain or can change faster than the system can recover.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The design tradeoff requires failure consequences to outweigh the cost of unused reserve.", "role_mapping": "Crossing cost -> downside; headroom -> reserve cost.", "slug": "margin_of_safety", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b058_a12_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The core tension is not whether unused headroom has a cost, but whether the cost of no headroom has been honestly priced. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The consequence of crossing the boundary is materially worse than the cost of carrying some unused headroom.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The consequence of crossing the boundary is materially worse than the cost of carrying some unused headroom.", "The core tension is not whether unused headroom has a cost, but whether the cost of no headroom has been honestly priced."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Margin of Safety", "one_liner": "Buffer capacity.", "page_ref": "prime:margin_of_safety", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Crossing cost -> downside; headroom -> reserve cost.", "slug": "margin_of_safety", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The design tradeoff requires failure consequences to outweigh the cost of unused reserve."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The consequence of crossing the boundary is materially worse than the cost of carrying some unused headroom.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid margin is recognized and protected rather than consumed.", "slug": "margin_of_safety"}], "residual_id": "r:safety_margin_design:b058_a12_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b058_a12_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Typical triggers include demand spikes, structural stress, budget volatility, schedule uncertainty, liquidity risk, safety limits, ecological thresholds, staffing shortages, supply delays, and technical capacity limits. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Operators, planners, or leaders treat the remaining gap as spare capacity rather than as protected safety margin.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Operators, planners, or leaders treat the remaining gap as spare capacity rather than as protected safety margin.", "Typical triggers include demand spikes, structural stress, budget volatility, schedule uncertainty, liquidity risk, safety limits, ecological thresholds, staffing shortages, supply delays, and technical capacity limits."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid margin is recognized and protected rather than consumed.", "slug": "margin_of_safety"}], "normalized_requirement": "Operators, planners, or leaders treat the remaining gap as spare capacity rather than as protected safety margin.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Operators, planners, or leaders treat the remaining gap as spare capacity rather than as protected safety margin.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A mature margin design explicitly defines the stand-off distance.", "slug": "margin_of_safety"}], "residual_id": "r:safety_margin_design:b058_a12_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b058_a12_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The boundary may be known, but the gap between routine operation and that boundary is too small, poorly specified, politically consumed, or invisible until the failure occurs. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Existing controls define a threshold but do not define how far routine operation should stay away from it.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Existing controls define a threshold but do not define how far routine operation should stay away from it.", "The boundary may be known, but the gap between routine operation and that boundary is too small, poorly specified, politically consumed, or invisible until the failure occurs."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A mature margin design explicitly defines the stand-off distance.", "slug": "margin_of_safety"}], "normalized_requirement": "Existing controls define a threshold but do not define how far routine operation should stay away from it.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Existing controls define a threshold but do not define how far routine operation should stay away from it.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Routine operation has drifted close to the boundary because of growth, efficiency pressure, deferred maintenance, debt accumulation, optimism bias, or scope creep.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The boundary may be known, but the gap between routine operation and that boundary is too small, poorly specified, politically consumed, or invisible until the failure occurs. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Routine operation has drifted close to the boundary because of growth, efficiency pressure, deferred maintenance, debt accumulation, optimism bias, or scope creep. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Routine operation has drifted close to the boundary because of growth, efficiency pressure, deferred maintenance, debt accumulation, optimism bias, or scope creep.", "The boundary may be known, but the gap between routine operation and that boundary is too small, poorly specified, politically consumed, or invisible until the failure occurs."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Routine operation has drifted close to the boundary because of growth, efficiency pressure, deferred maintenance, debt accumulation, optimism bias, or scope creep."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 58, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-058", "ledger_sha256": "310544d61131a17d0ef39e8022c663e9b6fde54ff865eb7a7312fcc9450d943a"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Salience-Significance Decoupling", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:salience_significance_decoupling", "slug": "salience_significance_decoupling"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 4 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "An evaluator sees a subset of the world through a display, report, feed, dashboard, alert, search result, anecdote set, or memory cue. Because the visible subset is easier to notice, recall, or discuss, it is given more importance than unshown or less vivid alternatives. The system confuses attention allocation with significance measurement.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "An evaluator sees a subset of the world through a display, report, feed, dashboard, alert, search result, anecdote set, or memory cue. Because the visible subset is easier to notice, recall, or discuss, it is given more importance than unshown or less vivid alternatives. The system confuses attention allocation with significance measurement."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Streetlight effect requires search to follow observability rather than relevance, not merely a partial display.", "slug": "streetlight_effect"}], "residual_id": "r:salience_significance_decoupling:b058_a13_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b058_a13_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "An evaluator sees a subset of the world through a display, report, feed, dashboard, alert, search result, anecdote set, or memory cue. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A report, dashboard, feed, search page, briefing, classroom example, case set, or alert queue shows only part of the relevant universe.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A report, dashboard, feed, search page, briefing, classroom example, case set, or alert queue shows only part of the relevant universe.", "An evaluator sees a subset of the world through a display, report, feed, dashboard, alert, search result, anecdote set, or memory cue."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Streetlight effect requires search to follow observability rather than relevance, not merely a partial display.", "slug": "streetlight_effect"}], "normalized_requirement": "A report, dashboard, feed, search page, briefing, classroom example, case set, or alert queue shows only part of the relevant universe.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A report, dashboard, feed, search page, briefing, classroom example, case set, or alert queue shows only part of the relevant universe.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Salience is attentional prominence but does not entail that a user mistakes it for normative priority.", "slug": "salience"}], "residual_id": "r:salience_significance_decoupling:b058_a13_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b058_a13_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Visual prominence, ordering, repetition, color, notification, vividness, recency, or emotional charge could be read as priority. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Visual prominence, ordering, repetition, color, notification, vividness, recency, or emotional charge could be read as priority."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Salience is attentional prominence but does not entail that a user mistakes it for normative priority.", "slug": "salience"}], "normalized_requirement": "Visual prominence, ordering, repetition, color, notification, vividness, recency, or emotional charge could be read as priority.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Visual prominence, ordering, repetition, color, notification, vividness, recency, or emotional charge could be read as priority.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A salient item can also be the most important by the correct criterion.", "slug": "salience"}], "residual_id": "r:salience_significance_decoupling:b058_a13_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b058_a13_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The mechanism that made an item visible differs from the criteria that should make it important. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The mechanism that made an item visible differs from the criteria that should make it important."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A salient item can also be the most important by the correct criterion.", "slug": "salience"}], "normalized_requirement": "The mechanism that made an item visible differs from the criteria that should make it important.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The mechanism that made an item visible differs from the criteria that should make it important.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P095-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"], ["O1", "O3"], ["O1", "O4"], ["O1", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the possibility that contextual reference information changes interpretation.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A contextual reference may change the interpretation of what is presented.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a denominator that is hidden.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The relevant contextual reference is a hidden denominator.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a sample frame that is not shown.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The relevant contextual reference is an unshown sample frame.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a base rate that bears on interpretation.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The relevant contextual reference is a base rate.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a comparison set that is missing.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The relevant contextual reference is a missing comparison set.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "A hidden denominator, unshown sample frame, base rate, or missing comparison set may change an interpretation.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "reference frame may change interpretation", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P095-C01-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Salience can operate without a denominator or sample frame.", "slug": "salience"}], "residual_id": "r:salience_significance_decoupling:b058_a13_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b058_a13_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A hidden denominator, unshown sample frame, base rate, or missing comparison set may change the interpretation. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A hidden denominator, unshown sample frame, base rate, or missing comparison set may change the interpretation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A complete missing-denominator instance in which supplying the hidden denominator could not change interpretation would contradict the defining blocked-inference mechanism.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Missing Denominator", "one_liner": "Expose a count that only looks like information by firing one substrate-independent question — out of how many? — since a numerator reported without its reference population wears the shape of a rate while blocking every quantitative inference the reader needs.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:missing_denominator", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "missing_denominator"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "missing_denominator", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P095-C01-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record directly completes the hidden-denominator branch and preserves the possibility that restoring the denominator changes interpretation."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A complete spotlight-fallacy instance whose population base rate could not alter the coverage-based interpretation would contradict its selection-bias mechanism.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Spotlight Fallacy", "one_liner": "Infer that a property is common in a population because it is prominent in coverage of it — mistaking a selection bias for a base rate, since an attention-allocating channel surfaces cases by newsworthiness rather than by frequency.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:spotlight_fallacy", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "spotlight_fallacy"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "spotlight_fallacy", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P095-C01-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record directly completes the base-rate branch: a filtered sample is interpreted as population frequency until the base rate corrects it."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A complete base-rate-fallacy instance in which the base rate could not change the posterior interpretation would contradict the defining omitted-prior distortion.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Base Rate Fallacy", "one_liner": "The systematic human tendency to underweight or ignore the prior probability of a hypothesis when vivid, specific evidence is available, so a posterior estimate collapses toward the likelihood instead of tracking Bayes' rule.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:base_rate_fallacy", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "base_rate_fallacy"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "base_rate_fallacy", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P095-C01-U1", "why_it_fits": "The candidate universally entails that a base rate is a load-bearing contextual reference whose omission changes interpretation."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "If comparison with the rival hypotheses could not change the result's interpretation, the test would discriminate among them and the defining congruence bias would vanish.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Congruence Bias", "one_liner": "The reasoning bias of designing only tests that could confirm a favored hypothesis rather than tests that discriminate it from equally plausible rivals — a failure of test design, not evidence evaluation, that leaves a probe locally valid but globally non-diagnostic because its likelihood ratio sits near one.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:congruence_bias", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "congruence_bias"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "congruence_bias", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P095-C01-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record necessarily preserves both contextual reinterpretation and a missing comparison set."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "If the exhaustive partition did not alter interpretation of the packed event, the defining directional gap between packed and unpacked probability judgments would not exist.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Subadditivity Effect", "one_liner": "Diagnose why the judged probability of an event named as a whole comes in reliably below the sum of judged probabilities for its named parts — because unpacking recruits more cognitive support — reading the known upward sign off which figure was solicited packed versus partitioned.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:subadditivity_effect", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "subadditivity_effect"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "subadditivity_effect", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P095-C01-U1", "why_it_fits": "The packed-versus-unpacked effect directly instantiates the missing-comparison-set branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A complete null ritual with priors and alternative hypotheses fully incorporated would contradict the exact record's missing-inferential-furniture requirement.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Null Ritual", "one_liner": "The institutionalised practice of mechanically executing a null hypothesis significance test — nil-null, p-value, p < .05 verdict — severed from the alternatives, priors, effect sizes, and decision context inference requires, yet retaining full editorial authority as if it had not been.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:null_ritual", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "null_ritual"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "null_ritual", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P095-C01-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record directly completes the base-rate and missing-comparison branches because absence of priors and alternatives is constitutive."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A complete cherry-picking instance whose unshown evidence population could not alter the offered impression would contradict the full-distribution counterfactual.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Cherry Picking", "one_liner": "Selectively presenting confirming evidence while suppressing disconfirming evidence from the same available population, so the offered sample gives an impression the full distribution would not support — locating the dishonesty in the selection process, not the individual data points.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:cherry_picking", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "cherry_picking"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "cherry_picking", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P095-C01-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record directly completes both the unshown-sample-frame and missing-comparison-set branches."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Removing the base rate's influence would eliminate the content-only low-prior misclassification that defines the effect.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Martha Mitchell effect", "one_liner": "Diagnose the trap in which an evaluator discounts a true but improbable report as delusional purely on its low prior probability, never testing whether its external referent is real.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:martha_mitchell_effect", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "martha_mitchell_effect"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "martha_mitchell_effect", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P095-C01-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact credibility mechanism directly satisfies the base-rate branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A complete look-elsewhere instance in which the unshown search-wide comparison could not change significance contradicts the trials-factor definition.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Look-Elsewhere Effect", "one_liner": "Discount an exciting best-of-many find by the size of the search that produced it — converting a local p-value at one scanned peak into a global p-value asking whether any peak this extreme would occur anywhere, via the trials factor.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:look_elsewhere_effect", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "look_elsewhere_effect"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "look_elsewhere_effect", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P095-C01-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record directly completes the missing-comparison-set branch through the unreported scan window and global comparison."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A hidden denominator, unshown sample frame, base rate, or missing comparison set may change the interpretation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Users must allocate resources, belief, concern, blame, or action based on what they see.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: Users must allocate resources, belief, concern, blame, or action based on what they see. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Users must allocate resources, belief, concern, blame, or action based on what they see."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Users must allocate resources, belief, concern, blame, or action based on what they see."}, {"display_text": "Stakeholders are likely to ask “why is this shown?” and answer “because it matters” without evidence.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Stakeholders are likely to ask “why is this shown?” and answer “because it matters” without evidence. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders are likely to ask “why is this shown?” and answer “because it matters” without evidence."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Stakeholders are likely to ask “why is this shown?” and answer “because it matters” without evidence."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 58, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-058", "ledger_sha256": "310544d61131a17d0ef39e8022c663e9b6fde54ff865eb7a7312fcc9450d943a"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Sanctuary-Aware Source Control", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:sanctuary_aware_source_control", "slug": "sanctuary_aware_source_control"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 5, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A harmful or unwanted population repeatedly reappears because at least one low-contestation source remains able to survive, reproduce, recruit, or regenerate outside effective controller reach and then reseed zones where suppression occurs.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A harmful or unwanted population repeatedly reappears because at least one low-contestation source remains able to survive, reproduce, recruit, or regenerate outside effective controller reach and then reseed zones where suppression occurs."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Risk migration can happen once and need not involve repeated prevalence suppression.", "slug": "risk_migration"}], "residual_id": "r:sanctuary_aware_source_control:b058_a14_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b058_a14_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A harmful or unwanted population repeatedly reappears because at least one low-contestation source remains able to survive, reproduce, recruit, or regenerate outside effective controller reach and then reseed zones where suppression occurs. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Local suppression repeatedly lowers prevalence without producing durable elimination.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Local suppression repeatedly lowers prevalence without producing durable elimination.", "A harmful or unwanted population repeatedly reappears because at least one low-contestation source remains able to survive, reproduce, recruit, or regenerate outside effective controller reach and then reseed zones where suppression occurs."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Risk migration can happen once and need not involve repeated prevalence suppression.", "slug": "risk_migration"}], "normalized_requirement": "Local suppression repeatedly lowers prevalence without producing durable elimination.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Local suppression repeatedly lowers prevalence without producing durable elimination.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P095-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"], ["O1", "O3"], ["O1", "O4"], ["O1", "O5"], ["O1", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the source-zone and surrounding-sink-zone roles.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A source zone is compared with surrounding sink zones.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires lower observation capacity in the source.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The source zone has lower observation capacity than the sink zones.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires lower access capacity in the source.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The source zone has lower access capacity than the sink zones.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires lower authority capacity in the source.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The source zone has lower authority capacity than the sink zones.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires lower contestation capacity in the source.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The source zone has lower contestation capacity than the sink zones.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires lower intervention capacity in the source.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The source zone has lower intervention capacity than the sink zones.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "A source zone has lower observation, access, authority, contestation, or intervention capacity than surrounding sink zones.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "source zone has lower control capacity than sinks", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P095-C02-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Containment can surround a fully observable and reachable source.", "slug": "containment"}], "residual_id": "r:sanctuary_aware_source_control:b058_a14_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b058_a14_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A harmful or unwanted population repeatedly reappears because at least one low-contestation source remains able to survive, reproduce, recruit, or regenerate outside effective controller reach and then reseed zones where suppression occurs. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A source zone has lower observation, access, authority, contestation, or intervention capacity than surrounding sink zones.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A source zone has lower observation, access, authority, contestation, or intervention capacity than surrounding sink zones.", "A harmful or unwanted population repeatedly reappears because at least one low-contestation source remains able to survive, reproduce, recruit, or regenerate outside effective controller reach and then reseed zones where suppression occurs."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Containment can surround a fully observable and reachable source.", "slug": "containment"}], "normalized_requirement": "A source zone has lower observation, access, authority, contestation, or intervention capacity than surrounding sink zones.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A source zone has lower observation, access, authority, contestation, or intervention capacity than surrounding sink zones.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Migrated risk need not regenerate or reseed a previously cleared sink.", "slug": "risk_migration"}], "residual_id": "r:sanctuary_aware_source_control:b058_a14_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b058_a14_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A harmful or unwanted population repeatedly reappears because at least one low-contestation source remains able to survive, reproduce, recruit, or regenerate outside effective controller reach and then reseed zones where suppression occurs. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Movement or influence connects the sanctuary source to cleared or controlled zones.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Movement or influence connects the sanctuary source to cleared or controlled zones.", "A harmful or unwanted population repeatedly reappears because at least one low-contestation source remains able to survive, reproduce, recruit, or regenerate outside effective controller reach and then reseed zones where suppression occurs."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Migrated risk need not regenerate or reseed a previously cleared sink.", "slug": "risk_migration"}], "normalized_requirement": "Movement or influence connects the sanctuary source to cleared or controlled zones.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Movement or influence connects the sanctuary source to cleared or controlled zones.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P095-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve target regeneration as a capacity, not only a completed event.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The target can regenerate through reseeding.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve both detection and neutralization on the controller side.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The controller detects and neutralizes reseeding as a coupled response.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the directional rate inequality.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Target regeneration is faster than the controller's detection-and-neutralization response.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "The target can regenerate faster than the controller can detect and neutralize reseeding.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "target regeneration outruns controller reseeding response", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P095-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Risk migration has no mandatory reproduction or controller-rate relation.", "slug": "risk_migration"}], "residual_id": "r:sanctuary_aware_source_control:b058_a14_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b058_a14_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A harmful or unwanted population repeatedly reappears because at least one low-contestation source remains able to survive, reproduce, recruit, or regenerate outside effective controller reach and then reseed zones where suppression occurs. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The target can regenerate faster than the controller can detect and neutralize reseeding.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The target can regenerate faster than the controller can detect and neutralize reseeding.", "A harmful or unwanted population repeatedly reappears because at least one low-contestation source remains able to survive, reproduce, recruit, or regenerate outside effective controller reach and then reseed zones where suppression occurs."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Risk migration has no mandatory reproduction or controller-rate relation.", "slug": "risk_migration"}], "normalized_requirement": "The target can regenerate faster than the controller can detect and neutralize reseeding.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The target can regenerate faster than the controller can detect and neutralize reseeding.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P095-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve separate rather than unified ownership.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "At least two distinct owners exercise control.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve distributed control covering all three source-route-sink roles.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The separate owners control the source, routes, and sinks across the system.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Separate owners control the source, routes, and sinks.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "separate owners partition source-route-sink control", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P095-C04-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P095-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve separate controllers associated with the source-route-sink roles.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Distinct controllers act for the source, routes, and sinks.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve schedule-governed action by the controllers.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The separate controllers act according to schedules.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve schedule incompatibility rather than merely different schedule labels.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The controller schedules are mutually incompatible.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "The separate source, route, and sink controllers act on incompatible schedules.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "distributed controllers act on incompatible schedules", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P095-C04-U2"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "One owner can control every containment zone and route.", "slug": "containment"}], "residual_id": "r:sanctuary_aware_source_control:b058_a14_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b058_a14_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Strong local control coexists with weak source reach, and pressure on visible sinks can consume resources without changing the regenerative balance. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Separate owners control source, routes, and sinks and act on incompatible schedules.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Separate owners control source, routes, and sinks and act on incompatible schedules.", "Strong local control coexists with weak source reach, and pressure on visible sinks can consume resources without changing the regenerative balance."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 2, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 2}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "One owner can control every containment zone and route.", "slug": "containment"}], "normalized_requirement": "Separate owners control source, routes, and sinks and act on incompatible schedules.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 2 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Separate owners control source, routes, and sinks and act on incompatible schedules.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 58, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-058", "ledger_sha256": "310544d61131a17d0ef39e8022c663e9b6fde54ff865eb7a7312fcc9450d943a"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Sandboxing", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:sandboxing", "slug": "sandboxing"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 5, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is an all-or-nothing exposure gap. The system needs contact with risk to learn, validate, train, debug, or innovate, but full contact with the live environment would create unacceptable blast radius. Without a sandbox, decision makers often alternate between overprotection and recklessness: they either block useful experiments entirely or permit them in unsafe ways.\n\nThe problem becomes visible when tests pollute live data, experimental releases cause real incidents, learners cannot practice without harming real outcomes, hazardous work lacks containment, or regulatory novelty is handled only through blanket prohibition or full permission. Sandboxing inserts an intermediate state between prohibition and production.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A potentially useful but risky activity needs to occur, yet direct exposure to the full live system would create unacceptable harm, contamination, disruption, leakage, legal exposure, reputational damage, or irreversible consequences."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime places uncertain, untrusted, hazardous, or immature activity inside a bounded execution environment.", "role_mapping": "Risky activity -> sandbox workload; unapproved behavior -> uncertainty.", "slug": "sandboxing", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b058_a15_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when the risky activity is valuable, uncertain, untrusted, immature, hazardous, or not yet approved. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The system must test, train, analyze, execute, or experiment with something whose behavior is uncertain, untrusted, hazardous, immature, or not yet approved.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The system must test, train, analyze, execute, or experiment with something whose behavior is uncertain, untrusted, hazardous, immature, or not yet approved.", "It is especially useful when the risky activity is valuable, uncertain, untrusted, immature, hazardous, or not yet approved."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Sandboxing", "one_liner": "Exercise an untrusted candidate inside a bounded, observable enclosure.", "page_ref": "prime:sandboxing", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Risky activity -> sandbox workload; unapproved behavior -> uncertainty.", "slug": "sandboxing", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime places uncertain, untrusted, hazardous, or immature activity inside a bounded execution environment."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The system must test, train, analyze, execute, or experiment with something whose behavior is uncertain, untrusted, hazardous, immature, or not yet approved.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The sandbox exists because learning by action is needed while unrestricted live trial has unacceptable blast radius.", "role_mapping": "Learning -> execution evidence; live environment -> protected exterior.", "slug": "sandboxing", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b058_a15_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The system needs contact with risk to learn, validate, train, debug, or innovate, but full contact with the live environment would create unacceptable blast radius. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Learning from action is necessary, but the live environment has too much blast radius for unrestricted trial and error.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Learning from action is necessary, but the live environment has too much blast radius for unrestricted trial and error.", "The system needs contact with risk to learn, validate, train, debug, or innovate, but full contact with the live environment would create unacceptable blast radius."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Sandboxing", "one_liner": "Exercise an untrusted candidate inside a bounded, observable enclosure.", "page_ref": "prime:sandboxing", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Learning -> execution evidence; live environment -> protected exterior.", "slug": "sandboxing", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The sandbox exists because learning by action is needed while unrestricted live trial has unacceptable blast radius."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Learning from action is necessary, but the live environment has too much blast radius for unrestricted trial and error.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Potential damage to users, data, safety, or compliance supplies the harm that the boundary must contain.", "role_mapping": "Failure harm -> blast radius; real systems -> protected exterior.", "slug": "sandboxing", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b058_a15_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A potentially useful but risky activity needs to occur, yet direct exposure to the full live system would create unacceptable harm, contamination, disruption, leakage, legal exposure, reputational damage, or irreversible consequences. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Failure could damage production services, real users, public trust, sensitive data, physical safety, legal compliance, market stability, or vulnerable participants.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Failure could damage production services, real users, public trust, sensitive data, physical safety, legal compliance, market stability, or vulnerable participants.", "A potentially useful but risky activity needs to occur, yet direct exposure to the full live system would create unacceptable harm, contamination, disruption, leakage, legal exposure, reputational damage, or irreversible consequences."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Sandboxing", "one_liner": "Exercise an untrusted candidate inside a bounded, observable enclosure.", "page_ref": "prime:sandboxing", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Failure harm -> blast radius; real systems -> protected exterior.", "slug": "sandboxing", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Potential damage to users, data, safety, or compliance supplies the harm that the boundary must contain."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Failure could damage production services, real users, public trust, sensitive data, physical safety, legal compliance, market stability, or vulnerable participants.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Meaningful technical, physical, or institutional separation is the prime's defining containment boundary.", "role_mapping": "Separation -> sandbox boundary; protected system -> exterior.", "slug": "sandboxing", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b058_a15_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when the risky activity is valuable, uncertain, untrusted, immature, hazardous, or not yet approved. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The risky activity can be meaningfully separated from the protected system through technical, physical, institutional, social, or procedural boundaries.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The risky activity can be meaningfully separated from the protected system through technical, physical, institutional, social, or procedural boundaries.", "It is especially useful when the risky activity is valuable, uncertain, untrusted, immature, hazardous, or not yet approved."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Sandboxing", "one_liner": "Exercise an untrusted candidate inside a bounded, observable enclosure.", "page_ref": "prime:sandboxing", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Separation -> sandbox boundary; protected system -> exterior.", "slug": "sandboxing", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Meaningful technical, physical, or institutional separation is the prime's defining containment boundary."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The risky activity can be meaningfully separated from the protected system through technical, physical, institutional, social, or procedural boundaries.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A sandbox generates bounded evidence before wider exposure while explicitly tolerating imperfect realism.", "role_mapping": "Bounded trial -> evidence; broader exposure -> later release.", "slug": "sandboxing", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b058_a15_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "In each case, the sandbox changes the question from “Do we allow this into the real system or prohibit it entirely?” to “Can we create a bounded environment where it can act, be observed, and be judged before broader exposure?” The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Useful evidence can be generated from a bounded environment before broader exposure, even if the sandbox is not perfectly realistic.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Useful evidence can be generated from a bounded environment before broader exposure, even if the sandbox is not perfectly realistic.", "In each case, the sandbox changes the question from “Do we allow this into the real system or prohibit it entirely?” to “Can we create a bounded environment where it can act, be observed, and be judged before broader exposure?”"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Sandboxing", "one_liner": "Exercise an untrusted candidate inside a bounded, observable enclosure.", "page_ref": "prime:sandboxing", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Bounded trial -> evidence; broader exposure -> later release.", "slug": "sandboxing", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A sandbox generates bounded evidence before wider exposure while explicitly tolerating imperfect realism."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Useful evidence can be generated from a bounded environment before broader exposure, even if the sandbox is not perfectly realistic.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Outputs from the bounded activity may be useful, but only after review, transformation, staged release, or controlled reentry.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when the risky activity is valuable, uncertain, untrusted, immature, hazardous, or not yet approved. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: Outputs from the bounded activity may be useful, but only after review, transformation, staged release, or controlled reentry. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Outputs from the bounded activity may be useful, but only after review, transformation, staged release, or controlled reentry.", "It is especially useful when the risky activity is valuable, uncertain, untrusted, immature, hazardous, or not yet approved."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Outputs from the bounded activity may be useful, but only after review, transformation, staged release, or controlled reentry."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 58, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-058", "ledger_sha256": "310544d61131a17d0ef39e8022c663e9b6fde54ff865eb7a7312fcc9450d943a"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Satiation-Aware Allocation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:satiation_aware_allocation", "slug": "satiation_aware_allocation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 3 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is misallocation under unequal satiation. The system treats resource units as though they have the same value wherever they land, even though recipients begin from different states and become partially satisfied over time.\n\nThis creates several predictable distortions. Easy-to-serve or already-visible groups may keep receiving support because they are measurable and organized. Equal distribution may look fair while leaving severe unmet needs untouched. Total demand may dominate attention even when the next unit does little for the loudest requester. Over time, the system can over-supply some targets and under-supply others without ever naming the marginal comparison.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Resources are allocated without accounting for the fact that additional units have different marginal value depending on current satisfaction, need, vulnerability, and context. Equal shares, historical budgets, total demand, political pressure, or loud request volume can send more resources to already-satisfied targets while high-marginal-need targets remain underserved."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A scarce resource can be indivisible and allocated all at once.", "slug": "scarcity"}], "residual_id": "r:satiation_aware_allocation:b059_a01_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b059_a01_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Resources are allocated without accounting for the fact that additional units have different marginal value depending on current satisfaction, need, vulnerability, and context. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A scarce or limited resource can be allocated incrementally.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A scarce or limited resource can be allocated incrementally.", "Resources are allocated without accounting for the fact that additional units have different marginal value depending on current satisfaction, need, vulnerability, and context."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A scarce resource can be indivisible and allocated all at once.", "slug": "scarcity"}], "normalized_requirement": "A scarce or limited resource can be allocated incrementally.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A scarce or limited resource can be allocated incrementally.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P095-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O3", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve cross-target heterogeneity.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "At least two allocation targets differ from one another.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This subject-axis branch requires recipients.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The compared allocation targets are recipients.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This subject-axis branch requires uses.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The compared allocation targets are uses.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This dimension-axis branch requires current satisfaction.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The difference concerns current satisfaction.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This dimension-axis branch requires unmet need.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The difference concerns unmet need.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Recipients or uses differ from one another in current satisfaction or unmet need.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "allocation targets differ in current need state", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P095-C05-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Allocation can divide resources among identical recipients with equal need.", "slug": "allocation"}], "residual_id": "r:satiation_aware_allocation:b059_a01_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b059_a01_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is strongest when the system can make a defensible estimate of current satisfaction and marginal need, and when affected parties have some way to challenge errors. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Recipients or uses differ in current satisfaction or unmet need.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Recipients or uses differ in current satisfaction or unmet need.", "It is strongest when the system can make a defensible estimate of current satisfaction and marginal need, and when affected parties have some way to challenge errors."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Allocation can divide resources among identical recipients with equal need.", "slug": "allocation"}], "normalized_requirement": "Recipients or uses differ in current satisfaction or unmet need.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Recipients or uses differ in current satisfaction or unmet need.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime requires each additional unit to contribute less value after earlier units have been supplied.", "role_mapping": "Partial satisfaction -> accumulated input; marginal value -> incremental gain.", "slug": "diminishing_incremental_gains", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b059_a01_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Resources are allocated without accounting for the fact that additional units have different marginal value depending on current satisfaction, need, vulnerability, and context. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Marginal value declines after partial satisfaction.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Marginal value declines after partial satisfaction.", "Resources are allocated without accounting for the fact that additional units have different marginal value depending on current satisfaction, need, vulnerability, and context."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Diminishing Incremental Gains", "one_liner": "Reduced benefit per unit.", "page_ref": "prime:diminishing_incremental_gains", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Partial satisfaction -> accumulated input; marginal value -> incremental gain.", "slug": "diminishing_incremental_gains", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime requires each additional unit to contribute less value after earlier units have been supplied."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Marginal value declines after partial satisfaction.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Allocation must remain legitimate under equity constraints.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this deployment constraint: Allocation must remain legitimate under equity constraints. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Allocation must remain legitimate under equity constraints."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Allocation must remain legitimate under equity constraints."}, {"display_text": "The decision can be updated as conditions change.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: The decision can be updated as conditions change. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The decision can be updated as conditions change."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The decision can be updated as conditions change."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 59, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-059", "ledger_sha256": "a84e472731ce05492015639025bb4918991ef300492470f403fe08783c5b05c1"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Satisficing Threshold Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:satisficing_threshold_design", "slug": "satisficing_threshold_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 2, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 5, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 8 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 8}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Without a governed threshold, criteria remain vague or move after a favorite appears; a single score compensates for protected harm; incumbent access determines which candidates appear first; time pressure is asserted without a budget; point estimates near the threshold are treated as certain; and acceptance produces no funded handoff or monitoring. The system then alternates between analysis paralysis and arbitrary convenience. “Good enough” hides whose need counts, who bears residual risk, how long sufficiency must last, and what evidence would reopen the choice.\n\nThe root tension is search and evidence have real costs, but closure becomes arbitrary or harmful unless “good enough” is tied to legitimate need, protected floors, evidence, fair access, and a reversible commitment.\n\n- analysis paralysis and missed opportunity windows\n- escalating information and comparison cost\n- preference drift and criteria manipulation\n- incumbent first-order and presentation bias\n- acceptance of options that violate noncompensable needs\n- hidden inequity and inaccessible qualification paths\n- fragile commitments and repeated reopening\n- overoptimization complexity and loss of adaptability", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A decision system either searches indefinitely for the best option or closes opportunistically on the first plausible one. Criteria are vague, added after favorites emerge, or collapsed into a single score that lets high performance compensate for safety, rights, feasibility, or access failures. Search order favors incumbents and well-connected candidates. Time pressure is invoked without a predeclared budget. Uncertainty is ignored, minimum compliance is confused with real sufficiency, and nobody records what would reopen the choice. The result is analysis paralysis, decision fatigue, excessive comparison, arbitrary closure, lock-in, or low-quality acceptance."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Satisficing can be selected before search expands or marginal improvement becomes small.", "slug": "satisficing"}], "residual_id": "r:satisficing_threshold_design:b059_a02_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b059_a02_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A decision system either searches indefinitely for the best option or closes opportunistically on the first plausible one. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: option comparison expands while likely decision improvement becomes small.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["option comparison expands while likely decision improvement becomes small", "A decision system either searches indefinitely for the best option or closes opportunistically on the first plausible one."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Satisficing can be selected before search expands or marginal improvement becomes small.", "slug": "satisficing"}], "normalized_requirement": "option comparison expands while likely decision improvement becomes small", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "option comparison expands while likely decision improvement becomes small", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime substitutes an aspiration threshold for unavailable exhaustive optimization under bounded search.", "role_mapping": "No knowable optimum -> bounded search; acceptable option -> satisficing threshold.", "slug": "satisficing", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The exact prime requires limited time, information, and computation that prevent globally optimal choice.", "role_mapping": "Resource limits -> cognitive/computational bounds; unknowable optimum -> constrained decision.", "slug": "bounded_rationality", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b059_a02_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is most valuable when stakeholders can state needs and protected floors but cannot justify pursuing a global optimum. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: no feasible global optimum is knowable within available time information or computation.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["no feasible global optimum is knowable within available time information or computation", "It is most valuable when stakeholders can state needs and protected floors but cannot justify pursuing a global optimum."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Satisficing", "one_liner": "Accept good-enough solution.", "page_ref": "prime:satisficing", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "No knowable optimum -> bounded search; acceptable option -> satisficing threshold.", "slug": "satisficing", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime substitutes an aspiration threshold for unavailable exhaustive optimization under bounded search."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Bounded Rationality", "one_liner": "Limited decision capacity.", "page_ref": "prime:bounded_rationality", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Resource limits -> cognitive/computational bounds; unknowable optimum -> constrained decision.", "slug": "bounded_rationality", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime requires limited time, information, and computation that prevent globally optimal choice."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "no feasible global optimum is knowable within available time information or computation", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P095-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a plurality of choice candidates.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Multiple choice candidates become available.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve one-after-another arrival.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The choice candidates arrive sequentially rather than as a simultaneous set.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "Choice candidates arrive sequentially.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "choice candidates arrive in sequence", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P095-C06-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P095-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve delay of choice as the source of an incurred cost.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Delaying the choice incurs cost.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve decision-relevant cost magnitude rather than any arbitrarily small cost.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The incurred cost is material rather than negligible for the decision.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Delaying choice incurs a material cost.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "delay of choice incurs material cost", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P095-C06-U2"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Satisficing can operate on a simultaneously available choice set.", "slug": "satisficing"}], "residual_id": "r:satisficing_threshold_design:b059_a02_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b059_a02_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when optimization is unknowable, unstable, disputed, or too expensive; candidates arrive sequentially; comparison consumes material time or attention; or a group repeatedly oscillates between endless search and opportunistic first-fit closure. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: candidates arrive sequentially and delaying choice has material cost.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["candidates arrive sequentially and delaying choice has material cost", "Use this archetype when optimization is unknowable, unstable, disputed, or too expensive; candidates arrive sequentially; comparison consumes material time or attention; or a group repeatedly oscillates between endless search and opportunistic first-fit closure."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 2, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 2}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Satisficing can operate on a simultaneously available choice set.", "slug": "satisficing"}], "normalized_requirement": "candidates arrive sequentially and delaying choice has material cost", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 2 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "candidates arrive sequentially and delaying choice has material cost", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid satisficing rule already has an aspiration threshold.", "slug": "satisficing"}], "residual_id": "r:satisficing_threshold_design:b059_a02_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b059_a02_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is most valuable when stakeholders can state needs and protected floors but cannot justify pursuing a global optimum. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: stakeholders use “good enough” without a shared threshold or protected floor.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["stakeholders use “good enough” without a shared threshold or protected floor", "It is most valuable when stakeholders can state needs and protected floors but cannot justify pursuing a global optimum."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid satisficing rule already has an aspiration threshold.", "slug": "satisficing"}], "normalized_requirement": "stakeholders use “good enough” without a shared threshold or protected floor", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "stakeholders use “good enough” without a shared threshold or protected floor", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P095-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve achieved viability rather than merely possible future viability.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "At least one option has become viable.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve continuing requirement growth.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Requirements continue to expand.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the stated temporal ordering.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The continuing requirement growth occurs after viable options appear.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "Requirements continue to grow after viable options appear.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "requirements grow after viability is achieved", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P095-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Requirements can remain fixed.", "slug": "satisficing"}], "residual_id": "r:satisficing_threshold_design:b059_a02_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b059_a02_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: requirements continue growing after viable options appear. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["requirements continue growing after viable options appear"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Requirements can remain fixed.", "slug": "satisficing"}], "normalized_requirement": "requirements continue growing after viable options appear", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "requirements continue growing after viable options appear", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A satisficing decision can close once and never be revisited.", "slug": "satisficing"}], "residual_id": "r:satisficing_threshold_design:b059_a02_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b059_a02_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The result is analysis paralysis, decision fatigue, excessive comparison, arbitrary closure, lock-in, or low-quality acceptance. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: teams repeatedly revisit a decision because closure and reopen rules are absent.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["teams repeatedly revisit a decision because closure and reopen rules are absent", "The result is analysis paralysis, decision fatigue, excessive comparison, arbitrary closure, lock-in, or low-quality acceptance."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A satisficing decision can close once and never be revisited.", "slug": "satisficing"}], "normalized_requirement": "teams repeatedly revisit a decision because closure and reopen rules are absent", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "teams repeatedly revisit a decision because closure and reopen rules are absent", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P095-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"], ["O1", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve first-fit selection as the operative rule.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A decision system uses a first-fit rule.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires selection outcomes to depend on presentation or search order.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The first-fit rule creates order dependence.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires the rule to advantage incumbents.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The first-fit rule creates incumbent advantage.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "A first-fit rule creates order dependence or incumbent advantage.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "first-fit rule creates path-dependent selection", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P095-C08-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A satisficing search can randomize order or compare a fixed batch.", "slug": "satisficing"}], "residual_id": "r:satisficing_threshold_design:b059_a02_c7", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b059_a02_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Search order favors incumbents and well-connected candidates. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: a first-fit rule creates order dependence or incumbent advantage.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["a first-fit rule creates order dependence or incumbent advantage", "Search order favors incumbents and well-connected candidates."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A complete Einstellung instance without first-adequate-match stopping, cue-order dependence, or familiar-method advantage contradicts retrieval-driven blocking.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Einstellung Effect", "one_liner": "Diagnose a skilled solver's failure on a near-surface variant not as missing knowledge but as retrieval-driven blocking — the first-cued familiar method is retrieved, judged adequate, and halts search before a simpler dominating alternative is ever compared.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:einstellung_effect", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "einstellung_effect"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "einstellung_effect", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P095-C08-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record directly completes both branches: first-fit stopping is order-dependent and advantages the familiar incumbent method."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "a first-fit rule creates order dependence or incumbent advantage", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P095-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"], ["O1", "O3"], ["O1", "O4"], ["O1", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve proxy optimization as the cause of degradation.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Optimization is directed at a proxy and causes degradation of another value.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires degraded robustness.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The degraded value is robustness.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires degraded fairness.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The degraded value is fairness.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires degraded adaptability.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The degraded value is adaptability.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires degradation of human value.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The degraded value is human value.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Optimizing a proxy degrades robustness, fairness, adaptability, or human value.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "proxy optimization degrades a substantive value", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P095-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The target criterion can be valid and non-proxy.", "slug": "satisficing"}], "residual_id": "r:satisficing_threshold_design:b059_a02_c8", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b059_a02_c8", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: optimizing a proxy degrades robustness fairness adaptability or human value. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["optimizing a proxy degrades robustness fairness adaptability or human value"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Given the general type bridge, a complete filter bubble that narrows non-chosen exposure without degrading informational autonomy or diversity would contradict the candidate definition.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_BRIDGE", "name": "Filter bubble", "one_liner": "The algorithmic narrowing of a user's information exposure when a recommender optimizes for short-term engagement on revealed preference — a self-reinforcing feedback loop that no user chose and no user effort can dissolve, correctable only in the ranking pipeline.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:filter_bubble", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O5"], "guard_type": "TYPE_SUBSUMPTION", "kind": "INTERPRETIVE_BRIDGE", "normalized_key": "informational_autonomy_is_human_value", "predicate": "Informational autonomy and exposure diversity are human values.", "rationale": "The candidate supplies the principal spine and one generally true atomic type bridge completes a DNF branch without laundering roles or relations."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "filter_bubble"}, {"kind": "INTERPRETIVE_BRIDGE", "value": "informational_autonomy_is_human_value"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "filter_bubble", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P095-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact DSA supplies the full proxy-degradation spine; one general type bridge places its autonomy-and-diversity loss under human value."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "optimizing a proxy degrades robustness fairness adaptability or human value", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [8], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "emergency or capacity limits require proportionate bounded choice.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: emergency or capacity limits require proportionate bounded choice. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [9], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["emergency or capacity limits require proportionate bounded choice"]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 9, "text": "emergency or capacity limits require proportionate bounded choice"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 59, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-059", "ledger_sha256": "a84e472731ce05492015639025bb4918991ef300492470f403fe08783c5b05c1"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Saturation Avoidance", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:saturation_avoidance", "slug": "saturation_avoidance"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is that the system treats a bounded response channel as though it were infinitely elastic. Intake can continue rising after useful response has already begun to flatten. This creates a misleading situation: activity metrics rise while outcome metrics stagnate or decline. People may see more effort and assume the intervention is stronger, while the receiving channel experiences crowding, fatigue, latency, quality loss, or signal dilution.\n\nA saturated channel often hides behind familiar explanations. Missed alerts are blamed on inattentive responders; customer delays are blamed on agent effort; low conversion is blamed on insufficient exposure; poor learning is blamed on weak motivation. Saturation avoidance asks a more structural question: has the response channel reached a point where additional input cannot be converted into useful output?", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A receptor, queue, team, audience, service, resource, or response pathway is approaching a capacity limit. Decision makers continue to add the same kind of input because intake is still possible, but the channel no longer converts additional input into proportional response. The result is waste, overload, delay, degraded quality, fatigue, missed signals, or hidden transfer of burden downstream."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime requires a bounded receptor or channel driven by input toward finite occupancy.", "role_mapping": "Response channel -> receptor capacity; intense input -> ligand or demand.", "slug": "receptor_saturation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b059_a03_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The structural problem is that the system treats a bounded response channel as though it were infinitely elastic. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A bounded response channel must absorb repeated, intense, or concurrent input.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A bounded response channel must absorb repeated, intense, or concurrent input.", "The structural problem is that the system treats a bounded response channel as though it were infinitely elastic."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Receptor Saturation", "one_liner": "Plateau effects at capacity.", "page_ref": "prime:receptor_saturation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Response channel -> receptor capacity; intense input -> ligand or demand.", "slug": "receptor_saturation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime requires a bounded receptor or channel driven by input toward finite occupancy."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A bounded response channel must absorb repeated, intense, or concurrent input.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Declining marginal response to added input is the exact diminishing-increment signature.", "role_mapping": "Additional input -> increment; smaller gain -> declining marginal effect.", "slug": "diminishing_incremental_gains", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b059_a03_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Saturation avoidance asks a more structural question: has the response channel reached a point where additional input cannot be converted into useful output? The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Additional input begins producing smaller marginal gains, slower response, worse quality, or more avoidance.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Additional input begins producing smaller marginal gains, slower response, worse quality, or more avoidance.", "Saturation avoidance asks a more structural question: has the response channel reached a point where additional input cannot be converted into useful output?"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Diminishing Incremental Gains", "one_liner": "Reduced benefit per unit.", "page_ref": "prime:diminishing_incremental_gains", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Additional input -> increment; smaller gain -> declining marginal effect.", "slug": "diminishing_incremental_gains", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Declining marginal response to added input is the exact diminishing-increment signature."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Additional input begins producing smaller marginal gains, slower response, worse quality, or more avoidance.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "At saturation additional input may be effectively costless, so the cost-value inequality is not mandatory.", "slug": "receptor_saturation"}], "residual_id": "r:saturation_avoidance:b059_a03_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b059_a03_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use Saturation Avoidance when there is a recognizable channel with finite response capacity and the system is still trying to push more through it. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The cost of pushing more input through a saturated channel is higher than the value of the small residual response.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The cost of pushing more input through a saturated channel is higher than the value of the small residual response.", "Use Saturation Avoidance when there is a recognizable channel with finite response capacity and the system is still trying to push more through it."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "At saturation additional input may be effectively costless, so the cost-value inequality is not mandatory.", "slug": "receptor_saturation"}], "normalized_requirement": "The cost of pushing more input through a saturated channel is higher than the value of the small residual response.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The cost of pushing more input through a saturated channel is higher than the value of the small residual response.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Finite occupancy creates a true plateau where additional input cannot increase useful receptor response.", "role_mapping": "Plateau -> occupancy limit; temporary load -> sub-saturation regime.", "slug": "receptor_saturation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b059_a03_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is weaker when there is no meaningful response channel, no evidence of flattening marginal response, or no possible action other than accepting all input immediately. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: There is a meaningful distinction between temporary high load and a plateau where more input no longer produces useful effect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["There is a meaningful distinction between temporary high load and a plateau where more input no longer produces useful effect.", "It is weaker when there is no meaningful response channel, no evidence of flattening marginal response, or no possible action other than accepting all input immediately."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Receptor Saturation", "one_liner": "Plateau effects at capacity.", "page_ref": "prime:receptor_saturation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Plateau -> occupancy limit; temporary load -> sub-saturation regime.", "slug": "receptor_saturation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Finite occupancy creates a true plateau where additional input cannot increase useful receptor response."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "There is a meaningful distinction between temporary high load and a plateau where more input no longer produces useful effect.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The system can detect at least one proxy for saturation, such as utilization, latency, attention loss, abandonment, error rate, fatigue, conversion decline, or queue growth.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "People may see more effort and assume the intervention is stronger, while the receiving channel experiences crowding, fatigue, latency, quality loss, or signal dilution. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: The system can detect at least one proxy for saturation, such as utilization, latency, attention loss, abandonment, error rate, fatigue, conversion decline, or queue growth. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The system can detect at least one proxy for saturation, such as utilization, latency, attention loss, abandonment, error rate, fatigue, conversion decline, or queue growth.", "People may see more effort and assume the intervention is stronger, while the receiving channel experiences crowding, fatigue, latency, quality loss, or signal dilution."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "The system can detect at least one proxy for saturation, such as utilization, latency, attention loss, abandonment, error rate, fatigue, conversion decline, or queue growth."}, {"display_text": "Input can be reduced, prioritized, delayed, rerouted, transformed, or paired with capacity expansion before hard failure.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when decision makers still have time to act before hard failure. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: Input can be reduced, prioritized, delayed, rerouted, transformed, or paired with capacity expansion before hard failure. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Input can be reduced, prioritized, delayed, rerouted, transformed, or paired with capacity expansion before hard failure.", "It is especially useful when decision makers still have time to act before hard failure."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Input can be reduced, prioritized, delayed, rerouted, transformed, or paired with capacity expansion before hard failure."}, {"display_text": "Downstream systems, people, users, learners, or environments would be harmed if saturation is allowed to persist.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Downstream systems, people, users, learners, or environments would be harmed if saturation is allowed to persist. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Downstream systems, people, users, learners, or environments would be harmed if saturation is allowed to persist."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Downstream systems, people, users, learners, or environments would be harmed if saturation is allowed to persist."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 59, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-059", "ledger_sha256": "a84e472731ce05492015639025bb4918991ef300492470f403fe08783c5b05c1"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Scalable Architecture Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:scalable_architecture_design", "slug": "scalable_architecture_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is that the system's architecture is scale-bound. It works because of arrangements that become bottlenecks under growth: centralized expertise, shared queues, single points of approval, tightly coupled components, informal coordination, bespoke integration, or local knowledge that cannot be replicated.\n\nGrowth changes the meaning of these arrangements. A manual exception path that was manageable for ten cases becomes a backlog at ten thousand. A founder's judgment that worked for one team becomes governance paralysis across twenty teams. A monolithic technical system that was fast to build becomes slow to change when many services and users depend on it. A pilot program that worked through tacit relationships becomes fragile when copied across regions.\n\nThe danger is nonlinear degradation. A system can look healthy at current size and then fail sharply when an unrecognized bottleneck binds. Scalable architecture makes the expected growth direction visible before the system is forced to improvise under overload.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "The system can function at current scale but its architecture is not prepared for growth. As scale increases, existing dependencies, bottlenecks, coordination paths, resource assumptions, or governance routines create nonlinear degradation in performance, cost, reliability, quality, or legitimacy."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A scalable system may have no central bottleneck.", "slug": "scalability"}], "residual_id": "r:scalable_architecture_design:b059_a04_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b059_a04_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It works because of arrangements that become bottlenecks under growth: centralized expertise, shared queues, single points of approval, tightly coupled components, informal coordination, bespoke integration, or local knowledge that cannot be replicated. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Current performance depends on a central team, single expert, manual coordination path, overloaded database, shared queue, or informal decision channel.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Current performance depends on a central team, single expert, manual coordination path, overloaded database, shared queue, or informal decision channel.", "It works because of arrangements that become bottlenecks under growth: centralized expertise, shared queues, single points of approval, tightly coupled components, informal coordination, bespoke integration, or local knowledge that cannot be replicated."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A scalable system may have no central bottleneck.", "slug": "scalability"}], "normalized_requirement": "Current performance depends on a central team, single expert, manual coordination path, overloaded database, shared queue, or informal decision channel.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Current performance depends on a central team, single expert, manual coordination path, overloaded database, shared queue, or informal decision channel.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P095-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the counterfactual requirement caused by growth.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "System growth would require many new burdens of a selected kind.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the 'many new' quantifier.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The new burdens are numerous rather than isolated.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires many new handoffs.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The new burdens are handoffs.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires many new approvals.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The new burdens are approvals.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires many new custom integrations.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The new burdens are custom integrations.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires many new exceptions.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The new burdens are exceptions.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires many new local adaptations.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The new burdens are local adaptations.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Growth would require many new handoffs, approvals, custom integrations, exceptions, or local adaptations.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "growth would multiply coordination burdens", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P095-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Some systems scale by simple replication without new handoffs.", "slug": "scalability"}], "residual_id": "r:scalable_architecture_design:b059_a04_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b059_a04_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It works because of arrangements that become bottlenecks under growth: centralized expertise, shared queues, single points of approval, tightly coupled components, informal coordination, bespoke integration, or local knowledge that cannot be replicated. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Growth would require many new handoffs, approvals, custom integrations, exceptions, or local adaptations.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Growth would require many new handoffs, approvals, custom integrations, exceptions, or local adaptations.", "It works because of arrangements that become bottlenecks under growth: centralized expertise, shared queues, single points of approval, tightly coupled components, informal coordination, bespoke integration, or local knowledge that cannot be replicated."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Some systems scale by simple replication without new handoffs.", "slug": "scalability"}], "normalized_requirement": "Growth would require many new handoffs, approvals, custom integrations, exceptions, or local adaptations.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Growth would require many new handoffs, approvals, custom integrations, exceptions, or local adaptations.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A scalable system holds these measures stable or sublinear.", "slug": "scalability"}], "residual_id": "r:scalable_architecture_design:b059_a04_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b059_a04_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "As scale increases, existing dependencies, bottlenecks, coordination paths, resource assumptions, or governance routines create nonlinear degradation in performance, cost, reliability, quality, or legitimacy. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Cost, risk, latency, rework, or quality variation appears to rise faster than volume.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Cost, risk, latency, rework, or quality variation appears to rise faster than volume.", "As scale increases, existing dependencies, bottlenecks, coordination paths, resource assumptions, or governance routines create nonlinear degradation in performance, cost, reliability, quality, or legitimacy."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A scalable system holds these measures stable or sublinear.", "slug": "scalability"}], "normalized_requirement": "Cost, risk, latency, rework, or quality variation appears to rise faster than volume.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Cost, risk, latency, rework, or quality variation appears to rise faster than volume.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Demand, users, cases, transactions, sites, regions, data volume, product variants, or participating actors are expected to increase materially.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when a system is expected to grow in users, transactions, cases, sites, teams, geography, data volume, product variants, or coordination complexity, and the current structure is likely to degrade under that growth. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Demand, users, cases, transactions, sites, regions, data volume, product variants, or participating actors are expected to increase materially. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Demand, users, cases, transactions, sites, regions, data volume, product variants, or participating actors are expected to increase materially.", "Use this archetype when a system is expected to grow in users, transactions, cases, sites, teams, geography, data volume, product variants, or coordination complexity, and the current structure is likely to degrade under that growth."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "Demand, users, cases, transactions, sites, regions, data volume, product variants, or participating actors are expected to increase materially."}, {"display_text": "The system has succeeded in a pilot or small deployment and now needs to move to larger, distributed, or more heterogeneous operation.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "If the immediate move is only distributing current load, use **Load Balancing**. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The system has succeeded in a pilot or small deployment and now needs to move to larger, distributed, or more heterogeneous operation. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The system has succeeded in a pilot or small deployment and now needs to move to larger, distributed, or more heterogeneous operation.", "If the immediate move is only distributing current load, use **Load Balancing**."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The system has succeeded in a pilot or small deployment and now needs to move to larger, distributed, or more heterogeneous operation."}, {"display_text": "Local units need enough autonomy to handle growth, but the whole system still needs shared standards, interoperability, and control.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Growth increases demand for capacity, differentiation, local action, and speed, while integration, quality, shared standards, and control still need to be preserved. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: Local units need enough autonomy to handle growth, but the whole system still needs shared standards, interoperability, and control. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Local units need enough autonomy to handle growth, but the whole system still needs shared standards, interoperability, and control.", "Growth increases demand for capacity, differentiation, local action, and speed, while integration, quality, shared standards, and control still need to be preserved."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Local units need enough autonomy to handle growth, but the whole system still needs shared standards, interoperability, and control."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 59, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-059", "ledger_sha256": "a84e472731ce05492015639025bb4918991ef300492470f403fe08783c5b05c1"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Scale-Appropriate Modeling", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:scale_appropriate_modeling", "slug": "scale_appropriate_modeling"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 4 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is wrong-scale reasoning. A model can be accurate in its own terms and still be useless for the decision because it represents the system at the wrong level. Too much microdetail creates overload and false precision. Too much aggregation erases the differences that make the decision matter. In both cases, the representation controls what the decision-maker can see.\n\nThe underlying tension is that a usable model must be simpler than reality, but not simpler than the behavior it needs to preserve.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Actors reason at the wrong scale: too fine-grained to see patterns, too coarse-grained to preserve relevant differences, or inconsistent across scales so that conclusions do not travel."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P095-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"], ["O1", "O3"], ["O1", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve excessive detail relative to the decision, not detail in the abstract.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The current model is more detailed than the decision requires.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires cognitive load caused by the detail mismatch.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The excessive detail creates cognitive load.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires computation cost caused by the detail mismatch.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The excessive detail creates computation cost.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires false precision caused by the detail mismatch.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The excessive detail creates false precision.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "The current model is too detailed for the decision and thereby creates cognitive load, computation cost, or false precision.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "excessive model detail creates decision burden", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P095-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Scale dependence can be studied with an appropriately detailed model.", "slug": "scaling_and_scale_dependence"}], "residual_id": "r:scale_appropriate_modeling:b059_a05_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b059_a05_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Too much microdetail creates overload and false precision. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The current model is too detailed for the decision and creates cognitive load, computation cost, or false precision.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The current model is too detailed for the decision and creates cognitive load, computation cost, or false precision.", "Too much microdetail creates overload and false precision."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Scale dependence can be studied with an appropriately detailed model.", "slug": "scaling_and_scale_dependence"}], "normalized_requirement": "The current model is too detailed for the decision and creates cognitive load, computation cost, or false precision.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The current model is too detailed for the decision and creates cognitive load, computation cost, or false precision.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Scale dependence need not arise from hidden heterogeneity or risk.", "slug": "scaling_and_scale_dependence"}], "residual_id": "r:scale_appropriate_modeling:b059_a05_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b059_a05_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A model can be accurate in its own terms and still be useless for the decision because it represents the system at the wrong level. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The current model is too coarse and hides heterogeneity, interactions, or risks that change the decision.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The current model is too coarse and hides heterogeneity, interactions, or risks that change the decision.", "A model can be accurate in its own terms and still be useless for the decision because it represents the system at the wrong level."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Scale dependence need not arise from hidden heterogeneity or risk.", "slug": "scaling_and_scale_dependence"}], "normalized_requirement": "The current model is too coarse and hides heterogeneity, interactions, or risks that change the decision.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The current model is too coarse and hides heterogeneity, interactions, or risks that change the decision.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime entails a relation or model whose behavior changes when evaluated at a wider or narrower scale.", "role_mapping": "Local validity -> one scale; failure after rescaling -> scale dependence.", "slug": "scaling_and_scale_dependence", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b059_a05_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This archetype is also useful when a model is being transferred from one scale to another. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A model, metric, or explanation seems valid locally but breaks when applied at a wider or narrower scale.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A model, metric, or explanation seems valid locally but breaks when applied at a wider or narrower scale.", "This archetype is also useful when a model is being transferred from one scale to another."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Scaling and Scale Dependence", "one_liner": "Patterns and constraints change qualitatively across different scales.", "page_ref": "prime:scaling_and_scale_dependence", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Local validity -> one scale; failure after rescaling -> scale dependence.", "slug": "scaling_and_scale_dependence", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime entails a relation or model whose behavior changes when evaluated at a wider or narrower scale."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A model, metric, or explanation seems valid locally but breaks when applied at a wider or narrower scale.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P095-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the epistemic status of suspicion.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A macro-level pattern is suspected rather than established.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the data-to-pattern obscuring relation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Micro-level data obscures the suspected macro pattern.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the 'rather than clarifying' contrast.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The micro-level data does not clarify the macro pattern in this relation.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "A macro pattern is suspected, but micro-level data obscures that pattern rather than clarifying it.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "micro-level data obscures suspected macro pattern", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P095-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Micro-level data can reveal rather than obscure a scale-dependent macro pattern.", "slug": "scaling_and_scale_dependence"}], "residual_id": "r:scale_appropriate_modeling:b059_a05_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b059_a05_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when stakeholders are talking past each other because one person is using individual examples, another is using team-level patterns, and another is using whole-system averages. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A macro pattern is suspected, but micro-level data obscures it rather than clarifying it.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A macro pattern is suspected, but micro-level data obscures it rather than clarifying it.", "It is especially useful when stakeholders are talking past each other because one person is using individual examples, another is using team-level patterns, and another is using whole-system averages."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Micro-level data can reveal rather than obscure a scale-dependent macro pattern.", "slug": "scaling_and_scale_dependence"}], "normalized_requirement": "A macro pattern is suspected, but micro-level data obscures it rather than clarifying it.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A macro pattern is suspected, but micro-level data obscures it rather than clarifying it.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Different stakeholders are arguing from incompatible levels of analysis.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when stakeholders are talking past each other because one person is using individual examples, another is using team-level patterns, and another is using whole-system averages. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Different stakeholders are arguing from incompatible levels of analysis. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Different stakeholders are arguing from incompatible levels of analysis.", "It is especially useful when stakeholders are talking past each other because one person is using individual examples, another is using team-level patterns, and another is using whole-system averages."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Different stakeholders are arguing from incompatible levels of analysis."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 59, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-059", "ledger_sha256": "a84e472731ce05492015639025bb4918991ef300492470f403fe08783c5b05c1"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Scale-Bridging Translation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:scale_bridging_translation", "slug": "scale_bridging_translation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a mismatch between the scale of evidence and the scale of use. A source-scale rule may be real and still fail at the target scale because units, interactions, incentives, capacities, environments, or measurement meanings change. Local units may not add up cleanly. Macro averages may not describe any local unit. A lab effect may be disrupted by field noise. A team process may depend on tacit context that disappears when standardized.\n\nWithout translation, teams fall into direct-transfer fallacy: they apply a source-scale relation as if it were scale-free. This creates pilot overreach, ecological or atomistic fallacies, hidden construct drift, scale-blind metric reuse, and cargo-cult scaling.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A rule, model, metric, experimental result, pilot finding, or local practice is applied at another scale where its variables, interactions, assumptions, or validity conditions no longer match."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P095-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve distinct evidence and decision roles.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Evidence informs or bears on a decision.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the cross-scale mismatch.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The evidence originates at a different scale from the decision.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Evidence comes from a different scale than the decision it informs.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "evidence and decision operate at different scales", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P095-C13-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Scale dependence can be measured wholly within one scale comparison exercise.", "slug": "scaling_and_scale_dependence"}], "residual_id": "r:scale_bridging_translation:b059_a06_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b059_a06_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Decision-makers need to use evidence from somewhere, but evidence is produced at a particular scale. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Evidence comes from a different scale than the decision.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Evidence comes from a different scale than the decision", "Decision-makers need to use evidence from somewhere, but evidence is produced at a particular scale."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Scale dependence can be measured wholly within one scale comparison exercise.", "slug": "scaling_and_scale_dependence"}], "normalized_requirement": "Evidence comes from a different scale than the decision", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Evidence comes from a different scale than the decision", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P095-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the source-variable and target-scale roles.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Variables are defined at a source scale and considered for a target scale.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the absence of equivalent target-scale variables.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The source variables have no target-scale equivalents.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Source variables do not have equivalents at the target scale.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "source variables lack target-scale equivalents", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P095-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A scale-dependent variable can have a clear target-scale counterpart.", "slug": "scaling_and_scale_dependence"}], "residual_id": "r:scale_bridging_translation:b059_a06_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b059_a06_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The tension is resolved by translating the source insight into target-scale constructs and then validating the bridge. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Source variables do not have target-scale equivalents.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Source variables do not have target-scale equivalents", "The tension is resolved by translating the source insight into target-scale constructs and then validating the bridge."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A scale-dependent variable can have a clear target-scale counterpart.", "slug": "scaling_and_scale_dependence"}], "normalized_requirement": "Source variables do not have target-scale equivalents", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Source variables do not have target-scale equivalents", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime is precisely the change in interactions or behavior as observational or operating scale changes.", "role_mapping": "Scale change -> rescaling; changed interaction -> dependent response.", "slug": "scaling_and_scale_dependence", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b059_a06_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A source-scale rule may be real and still fail at the target scale because units, interactions, incentives, capacities, environments, or measurement meanings change. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Interactions change with scale.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Interactions change with scale", "A source-scale rule may be real and still fail at the target scale because units, interactions, incentives, capacities, environments, or measurement meanings change."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Scaling and Scale Dependence", "one_liner": "Patterns and constraints change qualitatively across different scales.", "page_ref": "prime:scaling_and_scale_dependence", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Scale change -> rescaling; changed interaction -> dependent response.", "slug": "scaling_and_scale_dependence", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime is precisely the change in interactions or behavior as observational or operating scale changes."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Interactions change with scale", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P095-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve source and target context roles.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A source context and a target context are being compared.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the direction of the heterogeneity comparison.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The target context has broader heterogeneity than the source context.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "The target context has wider heterogeneity than the source context.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "target context is more heterogeneous than source", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P095-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A larger target can be more homogeneous.", "slug": "scaling_and_scale_dependence"}], "residual_id": "r:scale_bridging_translation:b059_a06_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b059_a06_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Target context has wider heterogeneity. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Target context has wider heterogeneity"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A target spanning multiple distinct transformation configurations cannot be no more heterogeneous than a single source layout while preserving that selected scope.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Responsive-Layout Breakage", "one_liner": "Diagnose the silent UI failure where an interface's content survives a viewport, device, or locale transformation but its layout-encoded meaning — priority, adjacency, hierarchy, above-the-fold prominence — is lost, so a passing content-accessibility check actively conceals the defect.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:responsive_layout_breakage", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "target_spans_multiple_layout_configurations", "predicate": "The deployed target space spans multiple viewport, device, and locale configurations beyond the single source layout.", "rationale": "The candidate supplies the principal spine and one candidate-anchored atomic context qualifier completes a DNF branch without laundering roles or relations."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "responsive_layout_breakage"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The deployed target space spans multiple viewport, device, and locale configurations beyond the single source layout."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "responsive_layout_breakage", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P095-C15-U1", "why_it_fits": "One anchored target-scope restriction completes the directional heterogeneity comparison."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A complete homogeneous-networks fallacy whose target deployment is no more heterogeneous than development would leave the uniformity assumption unbroken and contradict the definition.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Fallacy of Homogeneous Networks", "one_liner": "The implicit assumption that all nodes, links, OSes, versions, and configs across a distributed deployment are uniform — a missing degree of freedom in the system's model of its substrate that stays latent until deployment crosses a boundary where the uniformity breaks.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:fallacy_of_homogeneous_networks", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "fallacy_of_homogeneous_networks"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "fallacy_of_homogeneous_networks", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P095-C15-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record directly compares a homogeneous source slice with a substantially more heterogeneous target deployment."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Target context has wider heterogeneity", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Direct extrapolation is tempting.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when direct transfer is tempting. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Direct extrapolation is tempting. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Direct extrapolation is tempting", "It is especially useful when direct transfer is tempting."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Direct extrapolation is tempting"}, {"display_text": "The cost of being wrong grows at target scale.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The tension is resolved by translating the source insight into target-scale constructs and then validating the bridge. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The cost of being wrong grows at target scale. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The cost of being wrong grows at target scale", "The tension is resolved by translating the source insight into target-scale constructs and then validating the bridge."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The cost of being wrong grows at target scale"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 59, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-059", "ledger_sha256": "a84e472731ce05492015639025bb4918991ef300492470f403fe08783c5b05c1"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Scale-Economy Consolidation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:scale_economy_consolidation", "slug": "scale_economy_consolidation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 1, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is duplicated fixed cost. Each unit acts locally rationally by building or buying its own capability, but the system as a whole pays many times for setup, maintenance, staffing, tooling, negotiation, compliance, or infrastructure that could be shared.\n\nThe hidden danger is that consolidation can solve the cost problem while creating new structural problems: bottlenecks, loss of local fit, single points of failure, internal monopoly power, and shadow systems. For that reason, the archetype must include measurement and governance, not just aggregation.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Multiple actors, teams, sites, agencies, tools, or processes perform similar recurring work independently. Each carries its own setup cost, expertise burden, infrastructure, procurement effort, maintenance load, or administrative overhead, so the system duplicates fixed costs and leaves capacity underused."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime requires repeated output volume over which average cost can be evaluated.", "role_mapping": "Recurring units -> output quantity; repeated activity -> production scale.", "slug": "economies_of_scale", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b059_a07_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when recurring activity is duplicated across units and when a shared service, platform, facility, procurement vehicle, or operating capability can serve aggregated demand at lower quality-adjusted unit cost. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Recurring work, demand, infrastructure, purchasing, or support activity is repeated across several units.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Recurring work, demand, infrastructure, purchasing, or support activity is repeated across\nseveral units.", "Use this archetype when recurring activity is duplicated across units and when a shared service, platform, facility, procurement vehicle, or operating capability can serve aggregated demand at lower quality-adjusted unit cost."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Economies of Scale", "one_liner": "Cost reduction with scale.", "page_ref": "prime:economies_of_scale", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Recurring units -> output quantity; repeated activity -> production scale.", "slug": "economies_of_scale", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime requires repeated output volume over which average cost can be evaluated."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Recurring work, demand, infrastructure, purchasing, or support activity is repeated across\nseveral units.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Fixed, lumpy, or specialized costs spread over greater volume are the canonical source of falling per-unit cost.", "role_mapping": "Fixed cost -> scale input; per-unit reduction -> economy.", "slug": "economies_of_scale", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b059_a07_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The structural problem is duplicated fixed cost. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A meaningful share of the cost is fixed, lumpy, specialized, or overhead-like rather than proportional to each unit of use.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A meaningful share of the cost is fixed, lumpy, specialized, or overhead-like rather than\nproportional to each unit of use.", "The structural problem is duplicated fixed cost."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Economies of Scale", "one_liner": "Cost reduction with scale.", "page_ref": "prime:economies_of_scale", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Fixed cost -> scale input; per-unit reduction -> economy.", "slug": "economies_of_scale", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Fixed, lumpy, or specialized costs spread over greater volume are the canonical source of falling per-unit cost."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A meaningful share of the cost is fixed, lumpy, specialized, or overhead-like rather than\nproportional to each unit of use.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Economies can arise from purchasing power or physical process without modular shared interfaces.", "slug": "economies_of_scale"}], "residual_id": "r:scale_economy_consolidation:b059_a07_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b059_a07_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The archetype works only when the repeatable core. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The repeatable core can be standardized, modularized, or served through shared interfaces.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The repeatable core can be standardized, modularized, or served through shared interfaces.", "The archetype works only when the repeatable core"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Economies can arise from purchasing power or physical process without modular shared interfaces.", "slug": "economies_of_scale"}], "normalized_requirement": "The repeatable core can be standardized, modularized, or served through shared interfaces.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The repeatable core can be standardized, modularized, or served through shared interfaces.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime describes operating cost with scale and does not entail a particular consolidation transition.", "slug": "economies_of_scale"}], "residual_id": "r:scale_economy_consolidation:b059_a07_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b059_a07_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The coordination and transition costs of consolidation are likely to be lower than the long-term scale gain. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The coordination and transition costs of consolidation are likely to be lower than the\nlong-term scale gain."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The prime describes operating cost with scale and does not entail a particular consolidation transition.", "slug": "economies_of_scale"}], "normalized_requirement": "The coordination and transition costs of consolidation are likely to be lower than the\nlong-term scale gain.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The coordination and transition costs of consolidation are likely to be lower than the\nlong-term scale gain.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P096-C01", "dnf": [], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [], "predicate": "Users need enough common service that a shared capability can serve them without destroying essential local fit.", "resolution": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RESIDUAL", "semantic_scope": "NON_ABSTRACTION", "structural_head": "shared capability is admissible only above a common-service threshold that preserves local fit", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P096-C01-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Scale economy can deliberately standardize away local variation.", "slug": "economies_of_scale"}], "residual_id": "r:scale_economy_consolidation:b059_a07_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b059_a07_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when recurring activity is duplicated across units and when a shared service, platform, facility, procurement vehicle, or operating capability can serve aggregated demand at lower quality-adjusted unit cost. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Users need enough common service that a shared capability can serve them without destroying essential local fit.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Users need enough common service that a shared capability can serve them without destroying\nessential local fit.", "Use this archetype when recurring activity is duplicated across units and when a shared service, platform, facility, procurement vehicle, or operating capability can serve aggregated demand at lower quality-adjusted unit cost."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RECLASSIFIED", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 1, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Scale economy can deliberately standardize away local variation.", "slug": "economies_of_scale"}], "normalized_requirement": "Users need enough common service that a shared capability can serve them without destroying\nessential local fit.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RECLASSIFIED", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later candidate-blind atomization classified this remainder as a threshold, parameter, materiality test, or other non-abstraction rather than a catalog gap."}, "predicate": "Users need enough common service that a shared capability can serve them without destroying\nessential local fit.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Current local ownership creates duplicated tooling, underutilized capacity, inconsistent quality, or unnecessary specialization costs.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Local autonomy and context fit favor distributed ownership, while fixed-cost efficiency and. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Current local ownership creates duplicated tooling, underutilized capacity, inconsistent quality, or unnecessary specialization costs. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Current local ownership creates duplicated tooling, underutilized capacity, inconsistent quality, or unnecessary specialization costs.", "Local autonomy and context fit favor distributed ownership, while fixed-cost efficiency and"]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Current local ownership creates duplicated tooling, underutilized capacity, inconsistent\nquality, or unnecessary specialization costs."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 59, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-059", "ledger_sha256": "a84e472731ce05492015639025bb4918991ef300492470f403fe08783c5b05c1"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Scale-Invariance Testing", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:scale_invariance_testing", "slug": "scale_invariance_testing"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 4 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is false transfer across scale. A pattern observed at one level is assumed to hold at another level even though scale can change the mechanism. Growth can introduce congestion, coordination overhead, fixed constraints, saturation, heterogeneity, distributional tails, or new coupling among parts. Shrinking can remove network effects, redundancy, or diversity that made the larger system work.\n\nThe error often hides behind apparently reasonable language: “per user,” “per unit,” “the same process,” “just scale it up,” or “the model is normalized.” Those phrases may be valid, but only after the relevant invariance has been tested.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A behavior observed at one scale is being treated as if it will hold at another scale, even though the system may change when size, granularity, throughput, density, or aggregation changes."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P096-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a smaller-scale evidentiary source rather than evidence already produced at the target scale.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A result, observation, prototype, or practice is produced or observed at a limited scale.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail justificatory transfer from the smaller-scale evidence to the larger-scale use.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The limited-scale evidence is used to justify a scale-up decision or larger-scale application.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a directional difference between the evidence scale and the intended application scale.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The proposed application operates at a larger scale than the evidence-producing setting.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Evidence produced at a limited scale is used to justify applying the result at a larger scale.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "limited-scale evidence is used to justify scale-up", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P096-C02-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Scale invariance can be tested on a mature system with no pilot.", "slug": "scale_invariance"}], "residual_id": "r:scale_invariance_testing:b059_a08_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b059_a08_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when a pilot, prototype, local observation, small-team practice, aggregate metric, physical model, or domain rule is being applied at another scale. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A pilot, prototype, local observation, small team practice, or small-sample result is being used to justify scale-up.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A pilot, prototype, local observation, small team practice, or small-sample result is being used to justify scale-up.", "Use this archetype when a pilot, prototype, local observation, small-team practice, aggregate metric, physical model, or domain rule is being applied at another scale."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Scale invariance can be tested on a mature system with no pilot.", "slug": "scale_invariance"}], "normalized_requirement": "A pilot, prototype, local observation, small team practice, or small-sample result is being used to justify scale-up.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A pilot, prototype, local observation, small team practice, or small-sample result is being used to justify scale-up.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P096-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve an aggregate-level rule and its scale of origin or validity.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A rule is formulated, observed, or warranted at a large-scale aggregate level.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail use of the same aggregate rule at a constituent or local target.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The aggregate rule is applied to an individual, team, location, component, or equivalent lower-level unit.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve downward scale direction rather than transfer between peer aggregates.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The application target is at a finer granularity than the scale at which the rule is aggregate.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "A rule expressed or established at aggregate scale is applied to lower-level individuals, teams, locations, or components.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "aggregate-scale rule is applied to lower-level units", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P096-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Rescaling can remain between aggregate systems.", "slug": "scale_invariance"}], "residual_id": "r:scale_invariance_testing:b059_a08_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b059_a08_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is also useful in the opposite direction: when a large-scale aggregate pattern is being applied to local units. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A large-scale aggregate rule is being applied to individuals, teams, locations, or components.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A large-scale aggregate rule is being applied to individuals, teams, locations, or components.", "It is also useful in the opposite direction: when a large-scale aggregate pattern is being applied to local units."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Without a coarse directive handed to finer-grained execution, the case would not be a plan-execute gap.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Plan-Execute Gap", "one_liner": "The pathology in which a coarse-grained planning artefact cannot be enacted because the execution layer faces binding fine-grained constraints the planning model never represented — so the fix is constraint propagation and feedback, never a better forecast.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:plan_execute_gap", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "plan_execute_gap"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "plan_execute_gap", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P096-C03-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every plan-execute-gap instance has a coarse directive intended to govern a finer execution layer, preserving the downward granularity direction."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A large-scale aggregate rule is being applied to individuals, teams, locations, or components.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A scale-invariant relation can be unnormalized and empirically verified rather than presumed.", "slug": "scale_invariance"}], "residual_id": "r:scale_invariance_testing:b059_a08_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b059_a08_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially relevant when scale-up failure would be costly, when metrics are being normalized for comparison, or when a pattern has only been observed over a narrow scale range. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A metric or rule is normalized and therefore assumed to compare fairly across scales.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A metric or rule is normalized and therefore assumed to compare fairly across scales.", "It is especially relevant when scale-up failure would be costly, when metrics are being normalized for comparison, or when a pattern has only been observed over a narrow scale range."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A scale-invariant relation can be unnormalized and empirically verified rather than presumed.", "slug": "scale_invariance"}], "normalized_requirement": "A metric or rule is normalized and therefore assumed to compare fairly across scales.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A metric or rule is normalized and therefore assumed to compare fairly across scales.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A scale transformation can be purely mathematical with no transfer or deployment.", "slug": "scale_invariance"}], "residual_id": "r:scale_invariance_testing:b059_a08_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b059_a08_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A behavior observed at one scale is being treated as if it will hold at another scale, even though the system may change when size, granularity, throughput, density, or aggregation changes. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A model, policy, intervention, or design is being transferred across size, geography, time horizon, throughput, or granularity.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A model, policy, intervention, or design is being transferred across size, geography, time horizon, throughput, or granularity.", "A behavior observed at one scale is being treated as if it will hold at another scale, even though the system may change when size, granularity, throughput, density, or aggregation changes."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A scale transformation can be purely mathematical with no transfer or deployment.", "slug": "scale_invariance"}], "normalized_requirement": "A model, policy, intervention, or design is being transferred across size, geography, time horizon, throughput, or granularity.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A model, policy, intervention, or design is being transferred across size, geography, time horizon, throughput, or granularity.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The cost of being wrong about scaling is high.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The cost of being wrong about scaling is high. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The cost of being wrong about scaling is high."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The cost of being wrong about scaling is high."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 59, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-059", "ledger_sha256": "a84e472731ce05492015639025bb4918991ef300492470f403fe08783c5b05c1"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Scale-Invariant Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:scale_invariant_design", "slug": "scale_invariant_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 3 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The recurring structural problem is that a solution preserves its **form** while losing its **function**. A program keeps the same checklist while quality drops. A service adds users while response time collapses. A team model adds layers while decision latency grows. A governance structure repeats committees while local autonomy disappears. A platform expands modules while interfaces drift.\n\nThis failure often comes from hidden scale dependencies. The original design may have relied on informal communication, low density, spare capacity, unusually skilled people, short distances, small queues, or direct trust. When size changes, those hidden conditions change too. If the design does not identify and preserve the underlying relation, scaling becomes imitation rather than transfer.\n\nThe problem is not that scale changes. The problem is that the design does not say which behavior must remain invariant as scale changes.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A solution preserves its visible form while its functional behavior degrades when it is scaled up, scaled down, replicated, nested, densified, or applied at a different granularity."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P096-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a rule and an absolute quantity that governs its application.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A rule specifies an operating quantity in absolute rather than scale-relative terms.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail substantial denominator variation rather than one effectively fixed scale.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The relevant demand, population, risk, dependency count, or equivalent scale denominator varies widely across applications.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the mismatch between fixed absolute expression and varying operating scale.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The rule's absolute quantity remains unchanged despite the wide variation in the scale denominator.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "A rule remains expressed in absolute quantities while its demand, population, risk, or dependency-count denominator varies widely.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "absolute rule ignores a widely varying scale denominator", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P096-C04-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A scale-dependent law can be correctly expressed in absolute units.", "slug": "scaling_and_scale_dependence"}], "residual_id": "r:scale_invariant_design:b059_a09_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b059_a09_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A rule is expressed in absolute quantities even though demand, population, risk, or dependency count varies widely. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A rule is expressed in absolute quantities even though demand, population, risk, or dependency count varies widely."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A scale-dependent law can be correctly expressed in absolute units.", "slug": "scaling_and_scale_dependence"}], "normalized_requirement": "A rule is expressed in absolute quantities even though demand, population, risk, or dependency count varies widely.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A rule is expressed in absolute quantities even though demand, population, risk, or dependency count varies widely.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P096-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a solution, a source context, a target context, and a copying or replication relation.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A solution exists in one operating context and is copied into another context.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail a meaningful grain difference rather than copying between equivalent contexts.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The source and target contexts operate at different granularities.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve transfer of the solution form across contexts, not merely analogous solutions developed separately.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The solution is carried across the granularity difference by copying rather than being independently redesigned for the target.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "A solution is copied from one level, location, team, or institution to another operating at different granularity.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "solution is copied across contexts with different granularity", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P096-C05-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Rescaling need not involve organizational copying.", "slug": "scaling_and_scale_dependence"}], "residual_id": "r:scale_invariant_design:b059_a09_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b059_a09_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A solution preserves its visible form while its functional behavior degrades when it is scaled up, scaled down, replicated, nested, densified, or applied at a different granularity. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A solution is copied between levels, locations, teams, or institutions with different granularity.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A solution is copied between levels, locations, teams, or institutions with different granularity.", "A solution preserves its visible form while its functional behavior degrades when it is scaled up, scaled down, replicated, nested, densified, or applied at a different granularity."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "If no inherited upstream substrate were copied into a downstream system, the attack would fall outside the candidate's definition.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Transfer-Learning Attack", "one_liner": "Vulnerabilities, backdoors, or poisoned representations baked into an upstream pretrained model ride intact into every downstream system built on it, because the downstream team's audit boundary encloses only its new layers while the attack surface spans the whole inherited substrate.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:transfer_learning_attack", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "transfer_learning_attack"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "transfer_learning_attack", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P096-C05-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every transfer-learning attack requires an upstream component copied or reused inside downstream systems, carrying it across a component-to-system granularity boundary."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A solution is copied between levels, locations, teams, or institutions with different granularity.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Scale effects may improve performance or appear discontinuously.", "slug": "scaling_and_scale_dependence"}], "residual_id": "r:scale_invariant_design:b059_a09_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b059_a09_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Performance degrades gradually as size, density, hierarchy, throughput, or network degree increases. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Performance degrades gradually as size, density, hierarchy, throughput, or network degree increases."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Scale effects may improve performance or appear discontinuously.", "slug": "scaling_and_scale_dependence"}], "normalized_requirement": "Performance degrades gradually as size, density, hierarchy, throughput, or network degree increases.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Performance degrades gradually as size, density, hierarchy, throughput, or network degree increases.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A pilot, prototype, local practice, or small-team structure is being scaled beyond its original size.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially relevant when a pilot is being scaled, a local practice is being replicated, a service model is moving from one site to many sites, an organization is adding layers, or a platform is adding users and services. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: A pilot, prototype, local practice, or small-team structure is being scaled beyond its original size. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A pilot, prototype, local practice, or small-team structure is being scaled beyond its original size.", "It is especially relevant when a pilot is being scaled, a local practice is being replicated, a service model is moving from one site to many sites, an organization is adding layers, or a platform is adding users and services."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "A pilot, prototype, local practice, or small-team structure is being scaled beyond its original size."}, {"display_text": "The organization wants common standards without eliminating legitimate local adaptation.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The system needs a stable relation across scale, but absolute copying, generic scalability rhetoric, or ad hoc local adaptation hides which behavior must remain invariant and which details may change. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: The organization wants common standards without eliminating legitimate local adaptation. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The organization wants common standards without eliminating legitimate local adaptation.", "The system needs a stable relation across scale, but absolute copying, generic scalability rhetoric, or ad hoc local adaptation hides which behavior must remain invariant and which details may change."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The organization wants common standards without eliminating legitimate local adaptation."}, {"display_text": "Stakeholders debate whether to replicate the form of a successful case or adapt it freely.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Stakeholders debate whether to replicate the form of a successful case or adapt it freely. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders debate whether to replicate the form of a successful case or adapt it freely."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Stakeholders debate whether to replicate the form of a successful case or adapt it freely."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 59, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-059", "ledger_sha256": "a84e472731ce05492015639025bb4918991ef300492470f403fe08783c5b05c1"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Scale Reframing", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:scale_reframing", "slug": "scale_reframing"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 4, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 2, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 2 of 4 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is level mismatch. Actors are reasoning from a scale that compresses the information they need. This may look like blaming individuals for process failures, treating aggregate success as proof that all subgroups are well served, or assuming a local fix will work across a larger system.\n\nScale mismatch is subtle because the current view often contains real evidence. The problem is not necessarily false information; it is evidence made misleading by the level at which it is organized.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Actors are interpreting or acting on a system at a scale that hides the decisive variation, emergent behavior, local constraint, system-level pressure, or intervention point."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": "OR", "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime requires a relationship to reverse between within-group and aggregate evidence.", "role_mapping": "Local evidence -> subgroup direction; aggregate evidence -> pooled reversal.", "slug": "simpsons_paradox", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The exact prime requires aggregate values or conclusions to change under alternative groupings.", "role_mapping": "Evidence levels -> partitions; different direction -> partition-sensitive aggregate.", "slug": "partition_dependence_of_aggregates", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b059_a10_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Actors are interpreting or acting on a system at a scale that hides the decisive variation, emergent behavior, local constraint, system-level pressure, or intervention point. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Local evidence and aggregate evidence point in different directions.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Local evidence and aggregate evidence point in different directions.", "Actors are interpreting or acting on a system at a scale that hides the decisive variation, emergent behavior, local constraint, system-level pressure, or intervention point."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Simpson's Paradox", "one_liner": "A relationship can run one direction inside every subgroup and the opposite direction in the aggregate, because a confounder's distribution differs across subgroups and is silently mixed away on pooling.", "page_ref": "prime:simpsons_paradox", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Local evidence -> subgroup direction; aggregate evidence -> pooled reversal.", "slug": "simpsons_paradox", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime requires a relationship to reverse between within-group and aggregate evidence."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Partition Dependence of Aggregates", "one_liner": "Any statistic computed on partition-aggregated data is a function of the partition itself, not solely of the underlying data.", "page_ref": "prime:partition_dependence_of_aggregates", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Evidence levels -> partitions; different direction -> partition-sensitive aggregate.", "slug": "partition_dependence_of_aggregates", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime requires aggregate values or conclusions to change under alternative groupings."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Local evidence and aggregate evidence point in different directions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 1", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B2", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Partition dependence can change an estimate without any subgroup failing badly.", "slug": "partition_dependence_of_aggregates"}], "residual_id": "r:scale_reframing:b059_a10_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b059_a10_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when averages hide meaningful variation, local anecdotes conflict with aggregate data, symptoms appear at one level while causes are generated at another, or an intervention works locally but fails when generalized. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Averages, totals, or high-level summaries look acceptable while some cases or groups fail badly.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Averages, totals, or high-level summaries look acceptable while some cases or groups fail badly.", "It is especially useful when averages hide meaningful variation, local anecdotes conflict with aggregate data, symptoms appear at one level while causes are generated at another, or an intervention works locally but fails when generalized."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Partition dependence can change an estimate without any subgroup failing badly.", "slug": "partition_dependence_of_aggregates"}], "normalized_requirement": "Averages, totals, or high-level summaries look acceptable while some cases or groups fail badly.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Averages, totals, or high-level summaries look acceptable while some cases or groups fail badly.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 2", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B3", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P096-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve individual and system-level causal roles attached to the same problem.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A problem has affected or implicated individuals and at least one possible system-level causal factor.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail an individual-level blame attribution rather than merely discussing individuals.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Responsibility or causal blame for the problem is assigned to the individuals.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve possible systemic causality without requiring that it has already been conclusively established.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "A system-level incentive, workflow, infrastructure, policy, or equivalent arrangement may instead be causal.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the cross-level attribution contrast rather than two causal accounts at the same scale.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The blamed individual level differs from the possible systemic causal level.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "A problem is attributed to individuals despite the possibility that a system-level incentive, workflow, infrastructure, or policy is causal.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "individual blame persists despite possible systemic cause", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P096-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Simpson reversal is statistical and need not involve blame or intervention.", "slug": "simpsons_paradox"}], "residual_id": "r:scale_reframing:b059_a10_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b059_a10_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This may look like blaming individuals for process failures, treating aggregate success as proof that all subgroups are well served, or assuming a local fix will work across a larger system. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A problem is blamed on individuals even though incentives, workflow, infrastructure, or policy may be causal.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A problem is blamed on individuals even though incentives, workflow, infrastructure, or policy may be causal.", "This may look like blaming individuals for process failures, treating aggregate success as proof that all subgroups are well served, or assuming a local fix will work across a larger system."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Removing actual individual blame leaves a valid organizational-influence case, which is exactly why O2 needs the single context guard.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Organizational Influence Failure", "one_liner": "The accident-causation configuration in which upper-level resource, culture, and process decisions systematically stage the downstream conditions under which frontline operators produce unsafe acts — the apex of the HFACS four-level hierarchy, reclassifying the visible failure as the expression of an upstream choice rather than its cause.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:organizational_influence_failure", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2"], "guard_type": "OTHER", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "visible_problem_blame_assigned_to_frontline_individual", "predicate": "Responsibility for the visible problem is assigned to the implicated frontline individual.", "rationale": "The candidate supplies the structural spine and the single emitted qualifier is anchored, atomic, minimal, and does not add a second relation family."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "organizational_influence_failure"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "visible_problem_blame_assigned_to_frontline_individual"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "organizational_influence_failure", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P096-C06-U1", "why_it_fits": "With the atomic blame-attribution guard, the candidate's upstream-to-downstream accident structure entails every obligation without adding a new causal relation."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "An active failure investigated without blaming the operator remains valid, demonstrating that O2 is contingent rather than direct.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Active Failure", "one_liner": "The frontline operator's act at the sharp end that completes a hazard path by aligning with holes latent conditions had pre-positioned in a system's layered defenses — the proximate, visible half of Reason's Swiss cheese model.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:active_failure", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2"], "guard_type": "OTHER", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "visible_problem_blame_assigned_to_frontline_individual", "predicate": "Responsibility for the visible problem is assigned to the implicated frontline individual.", "rationale": "The candidate supplies the structural spine and the single emitted qualifier is anchored, atomic, minimal, and does not add a second relation family."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "active_failure"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "visible_problem_blame_assigned_to_frontline_individual"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "active_failure", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P096-C06-U1", "why_it_fits": "The candidate necessarily supplies the cross-level operator/latent causal structure, and one blame-attribution fact fills the only missing obligation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A problem is blamed on individuals even though incentives, workflow, infrastructure, or policy may be causal.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "Condition set 3", "within_set_operator": "AND"}, {"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B4", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P096-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a focal intervention and its local setting of origin.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A focal fix is associated with a local or original setting.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail recurring extension failure rather than one isolated implementation error.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The fix fails repeatedly when extended beyond the local setting.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires failure under a change in operating scale.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The repeated failure occurs when the local fix is scaled to a larger or smaller operating scale.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires failure under copying across sites or instances.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The repeated failure occurs when the local fix is replicated in additional settings.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires failure under broader application or generalization.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The repeated failure occurs when the local fix is generalized beyond its original case class.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A local fix repeatedly fails when it is scaled, replicated, or generalized beyond its local setting.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "local fix repeatedly fails under extension beyond its original setting", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P096-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Partition dependence need not involve an intervention or repeated failure.", "slug": "partition_dependence_of_aggregates"}], "residual_id": "r:scale_reframing:b059_a10_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b059_a10_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when averages hide meaningful variation, local anecdotes conflict with aggregate data, symptoms appear at one level while causes are generated at another, or an intervention works locally but fails when generalized. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A local fix repeatedly fails when scaled, replicated, or generalized.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A local fix repeatedly fails when scaled, replicated, or generalized.", "It is especially useful when averages hide meaningful variation, local anecdotes conflict with aggregate data, symptoms appear at one level while causes are generated at another, or an intervention works locally but fails when generalized."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Partition dependence need not involve an intervention or repeated failure.", "slug": "partition_dependence_of_aggregates"}], "normalized_requirement": "A local fix repeatedly fails when scaled, replicated, or generalized.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A local fix repeatedly fails when scaled, replicated, or generalized.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "Condition set 4", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "DISJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Stakeholders disagree because each is reasoning from a different level of granularity.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Stakeholders disagree because each is reasoning from a different level of granularity. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders disagree because each is reasoning from a different level of granularity."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Stakeholders disagree because each is reasoning from a different level of granularity."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 59, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-059", "ledger_sha256": "a84e472731ce05492015639025bb4918991ef300492470f403fe08783c5b05c1"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Scale Transition Management", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:scale_transition_management", "slug": "scale_transition_management"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 1, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 5 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is that practices are often scale-bound. A small system can rely on informal communication, direct expert judgment, personal relationships, manual fixes, local champions, and everyone knowing the context. A larger or more dispersed system cannot assume those conditions.\n\nWhen the old-scale assumptions remain hidden, scaling becomes naive replication. The system copies what worked before, but coordination costs rise, support work becomes invisible, quality varies, decisions bottleneck, and exceptions overwhelm the people who previously absorbed them.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system is moving from one scale to another, and practices that worked at the old scale no longer fit the new scale."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P096-C08", "dnf": [], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [], "predicate": "An operating-scale dimension is crossing a scale boundary.", "resolution": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RESIDUAL", "semantic_scope": "NON_ABSTRACTION", "structural_head": "operation crosses a scale threshold", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P096-C08-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A system can exhibit scale dependence while remaining at one current operating scale.", "slug": "scaling_and_scale_dependence"}], "residual_id": "r:scale_transition_management:b059_a11_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b059_a11_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It becomes valuable when more users, sites, staff, transactions, integrations, geography, or risk exposure make old routines unreliable. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Volume, users, staff, sites, cases, transactions, geography, integration complexity, risk exposure, or regulatory burden is crossing a scale boundary.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Volume, users, staff, sites, cases, transactions, geography, integration complexity, risk exposure, or regulatory burden is crossing a scale boundary.", "It becomes valuable when more users, sites, staff, transactions, integrations, geography, or risk exposure make old routines unreliable."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RECLASSIFIED", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 1, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A system can exhibit scale dependence while remaining at one current operating scale.", "slug": "scaling_and_scale_dependence"}], "normalized_requirement": "Volume, users, staff, sites, cases, transactions, geography, integration complexity, risk exposure, or regulatory burden is crossing a scale boundary.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RECLASSIFIED", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later candidate-blind atomization classified this remainder as a threshold, parameter, materiality test, or other non-abstraction rather than a catalog gap."}, "predicate": "Volume, users, staff, sites, cases, transactions, geography, integration complexity, risk exposure, or regulatory burden is crossing a scale boundary.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Scale-dependent behavior can improve rather than degrade coordination.", "slug": "scaling_and_scale_dependence"}], "residual_id": "r:scale_transition_management:b059_a11_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b059_a11_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when growth changes the kind of coordination, control, support, quality assurance, or ownership the system needs. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The old structure still appears locally functional but begins producing coordination delays, quality drift, inconsistent execution, overloaded leaders, brittle workarounds, or hidden manual labor.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The old structure still appears locally functional but begins producing coordination delays, quality drift, inconsistent execution, overloaded leaders, brittle workarounds, or hidden manual labor.", "Use this archetype when growth changes the kind of coordination, control, support, quality assurance, or ownership the system needs."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Scale-dependent behavior can improve rather than degrade coordination.", "slug": "scaling_and_scale_dependence"}], "normalized_requirement": "The old structure still appears locally functional but begins producing coordination delays, quality drift, inconsistent execution, overloaded leaders, brittle workarounds, or hidden manual labor.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The old structure still appears locally functional but begins producing coordination delays, quality drift, inconsistent execution, overloaded leaders, brittle workarounds, or hidden manual labor.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime is the move from bounded pilot conditions to routine wider operation with changed support, ownership, and governance requirements.", "role_mapping": "Pilot -> bounded implementation; expansion -> scale transition.", "slug": "pilot_to_scale_transition", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b059_a11_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The most common cases are pilot-to-production transitions, local-to-regional rollouts, small-team-to-large-organization growth, manual-to-automated transitions, and governance redesign under increased volume or risk. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A pilot, local implementation, or small-team process is being expanded into routine operation without sufficient attention to changed support, governance, monitoring, and ownership requirements.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A pilot, local implementation, or small-team process is being expanded into routine operation without sufficient attention to changed support, governance, monitoring, and ownership requirements.", "The most common cases are pilot-to-production transitions, local-to-regional rollouts, small-team-to-large-organization growth, manual-to-automated transitions, and governance redesign under increased volume or risk."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Pilot To Scale Transition", "one_liner": "An effect proven in a curated niche need not survive the heterogeneous distribution of scale.", "page_ref": "prime:pilot_to_scale_transition", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Pilot -> bounded implementation; expansion -> scale transition.", "slug": "pilot_to_scale_transition", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime is the move from bounded pilot conditions to routine wider operation with changed support, ownership, and governance requirements."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A pilot, local implementation, or small-team process is being expanded into routine operation without sufficient attention to changed support, governance, monitoring, and ownership requirements.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Diseconomies can arise despite mature interfaces, and growth pressure need not outrun them.", "slug": "diseconomies_of_scale"}], "residual_id": "r:scale_transition_management:b059_a11_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b059_a11_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when growth changes the kind of coordination, control, support, quality assurance, or ownership the system needs. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The organization or system is under pressure to grow faster than its interfaces, decision rights, cultural norms, quality controls, or operational support can mature.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The organization or system is under pressure to grow faster than its interfaces, decision rights, cultural norms, quality controls, or operational support can mature.", "Use this archetype when growth changes the kind of coordination, control, support, quality assurance, or ownership the system needs."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Diseconomies can arise despite mature interfaces, and growth pressure need not outrun them.", "slug": "diseconomies_of_scale"}], "normalized_requirement": "The organization or system is under pressure to grow faster than its interfaces, decision rights, cultural norms, quality controls, or operational support can mature.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The organization or system is under pressure to grow faster than its interfaces, decision rights, cultural norms, quality controls, or operational support can mature.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Scale dependence need not create qualitatively new dependencies or exception classes.", "slug": "scaling_and_scale_dependence"}], "residual_id": "r:scale_transition_management:b059_a11_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b059_a11_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A change in operating scale creates a new regime of dependencies, exception volume, stakeholder diversity, or failure consequences. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A change in operating scale creates a new regime of dependencies, exception volume, stakeholder diversity, or failure consequences."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Scale dependence need not create qualitatively new dependencies or exception classes.", "slug": "scaling_and_scale_dependence"}], "normalized_requirement": "A change in operating scale creates a new regime of dependencies, exception volume, stakeholder diversity, or failure consequences.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A change in operating scale creates a new regime of dependencies, exception volume, stakeholder diversity, or failure consequences.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 59, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-059", "ledger_sha256": "a84e472731ce05492015639025bb4918991ef300492470f403fe08783c5b05c1"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Scaling-Exponent Calibration", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:scaling_exponent_calibration", "slug": "scaling_exponent_calibration"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A decision, model, comparison, or design transfer treats size change as linear or proportional even though the target property scales with a characteristic exponent. The result is misforecast capacity, unfair benchmarks, wrong thresholds, overbuilt or underbuilt systems, and interventions that fail when moved across scale.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A decision, model, comparison, or design transfer treats size change as linear or proportional even though the target property scales with a characteristic exponent. The result is misforecast capacity, unfair benchmarks, wrong thresholds, overbuilt or underbuilt systems, and interventions that fail when moved across scale."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime relates the same kind of entity across sizes through a power-law scaling relation.", "role_mapping": "Entities -> comparable cases; size differences -> scale variable.", "slug": "allometry_and_scaling_law", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b059_a12_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Decision-making needs simple comparisons and portable rules, but systems often change shape when size changes. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The same type of entity is being compared across large size differences, such as organisms, firms, cities, systems, projects, networks, buildings, devices, or portfolios.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The same type of entity is being compared across large size differences, such as organisms, firms, cities, systems, projects, networks, buildings, devices, or portfolios.", "Decision-making needs simple comparisons and portable rules, but systems often change shape when size changes."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Allometry and Scaling Law", "one_liner": "Properties scale nonlinearly with size according to characteristic exponents.", "page_ref": "prime:allometry_and_scaling_law", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Entities -> comparable cases; size differences -> scale variable.", "slug": "allometry_and_scaling_law", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime relates the same kind of entity across sizes through a power-law scaling relation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The same type of entity is being compared across large size differences, such as organisms, firms, cities, systems, projects, networks, buildings, devices, or portfolios.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An allometric exponent can equal one, making simple division appropriate.", "slug": "allometry_and_scaling_law"}], "residual_id": "r:scaling_exponent_calibration:b059_a12_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b059_a12_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A decision, model, comparison, or design transfer treats size change as linear or proportional even though the target property scales with a characteristic exponent. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A metric is normalized per unit, per capita, or by simple division even though residuals suggest a nonlinear relation to size.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A metric is normalized per unit, per capita, or by simple division even though residuals suggest a nonlinear relation to size.", "A decision, model, comparison, or design transfer treats size change as linear or proportional even though the target property scales with a characteristic exponent."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An allometric exponent can equal one, making simple division appropriate.", "slug": "allometry_and_scaling_law"}], "normalized_requirement": "A metric is normalized per unit, per capita, or by simple division even though residuals suggest a nonlinear relation to size.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A metric is normalized per unit, per capita, or by simple division even though residuals suggest a nonlinear relation to size.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A power relation becomes approximately linear in log-log coordinates, with slope equal to the scaling exponent.", "role_mapping": "Curved ordinary plot -> power relation; log-log line -> exponent.", "slug": "allometry_and_scaling_law", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b059_a12_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Empirical plots show curved relationships on ordinary axes and approximately straight relationships on log-log axes. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Empirical plots show curved relationships on ordinary axes and approximately straight relationships on log-log axes."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Allometry and Scaling Law", "one_liner": "Properties scale nonlinearly with size according to characteristic exponents.", "page_ref": "prime:allometry_and_scaling_law", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Curved ordinary plot -> power relation; log-log line -> exponent.", "slug": "allometry_and_scaling_law", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A power relation becomes approximately linear in log-log coordinates, with slope equal to the scaling exponent."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Empirical plots show curved relationships on ordinary axes and approximately straight relationships on log-log axes.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A known allometric exponent is the exact parameter governing how the property changes with size.", "role_mapping": "Known exponent -> scaling coefficient; unused decision -> calibration gap.", "slug": "allometry_and_scaling_law", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b059_a12_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A decision, model, comparison, or design transfer treats size change as linear or proportional even though the target property scales with a characteristic exponent. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A domain already has known allometric or power-law exponents but the decision process is not using them.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A domain already has known allometric or power-law exponents but the decision process is not using them.", "A decision, model, comparison, or design transfer treats size change as linear or proportional even though the target property scales with a characteristic exponent."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Allometry and Scaling Law", "one_liner": "Properties scale nonlinearly with size according to characteristic exponents.", "page_ref": "prime:allometry_and_scaling_law", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Known exponent -> scaling coefficient; unused decision -> calibration gap.", "slug": "allometry_and_scaling_law", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A known allometric exponent is the exact parameter governing how the property changes with size."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A domain already has known allometric or power-law exponents but the decision process is not using them.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A pilot, small model, prototype, or local estimate is being extrapolated to a much larger or smaller case.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: A pilot, small model, prototype, or local estimate is being extrapolated to a much larger or smaller case. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A pilot, small model, prototype, or local estimate is being extrapolated to a much larger or smaller case."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "A pilot, small model, prototype, or local estimate is being extrapolated to a much larger or smaller case."}, {"display_text": "Past scaling attempts repeatedly underpredict coordination cost, infrastructure load, metabolic demand, failure rate, or tail exposure.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Past scaling attempts repeatedly underpredict coordination cost, infrastructure load, metabolic demand, failure rate, or tail exposure. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Past scaling attempts repeatedly underpredict coordination cost, infrastructure load, metabolic demand, failure rate, or tail exposure."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Past scaling attempts repeatedly underpredict coordination cost, infrastructure load, metabolic demand, failure rate, or tail exposure."}, {"display_text": "Scale-dependent comparisons are driving allocation, ranking, safety margins, design thresholds, or policy legitimacy.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A decision, model, comparison, or design transfer treats size change as linear or proportional even though the target property scales with a characteristic exponent. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: Scale-dependent comparisons are driving allocation, ranking, safety margins, design thresholds, or policy legitimacy. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Scale-dependent comparisons are driving allocation, ranking, safety margins, design thresholds, or policy legitimacy.", "A decision, model, comparison, or design transfer treats size change as linear or proportional even though the target property scales with a characteristic exponent."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "Scale-dependent comparisons are driving allocation, ranking, safety margins, design thresholds, or policy legitimacy."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 59, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-059", "ledger_sha256": "a84e472731ce05492015639025bb4918991ef300492470f403fe08783c5b05c1"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Scapegoat Displacement Interruption", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:scapegoat_displacement_interruption", "slug": "scapegoat_displacement_interruption"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 6, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 6, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "6 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A group, institution, community, or public is facing harm, uncertainty, failure, threat, shame, or loss, and blame is being channeled onto a substitute target whose causal responsibility is exaggerated, untested, or symbolically convenient. The scapegoat may be an outsider, minority subgroup, low-status member, messenger, visible operator, previous leader, unlucky participant, or abstract category. If the process continues, the group receives emotional closure while actual causes, accountable decision points, structural constraints, and repair obligations remain unresolved.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A group, institution, community, or public is facing harm, uncertainty, failure, threat, shame, or loss, and blame is being channeled onto a substitute target whose causal responsibility is exaggerated, untested, or symbolically convenient. The scapegoat may be an outsider, minority subgroup, low-status member, messenger, visible operator, previous leader, unlucky participant, or abstract category. If the process continues, the group receives emotional closure while actual causes, accountable decision points, structural constraints, and repair obligations remain unresolved."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime begins with group distress and pressure to project blame onto a target.", "role_mapping": "Crisis -> collective threat; immediate target -> scapegoat.", "slug": "scapegoating", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b059_a13_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A group, institution, community, or public is facing harm, uncertainty, failure, threat, shame, or loss, and blame is being channeled onto a substitute target whose causal responsibility is exaggerated, untested, or symbolically convenient. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A failure, crisis, loss, scandal, conflict, contamination, violence, or disappointment creates strong collective pressure for an immediate responsible target.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A failure, crisis, loss, scandal, conflict, contamination, violence, or disappointment creates strong collective pressure for an immediate responsible target.", "A group, institution, community, or public is facing harm, uncertainty, failure, threat, shame, or loss, and blame is being channeled onto a substitute target whose causal responsibility is exaggerated, untested, or symbolically convenient."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Scapegoating", "one_liner": "Channeling collective blame onto a substitute target.", "page_ref": "prime:scapegoating", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Crisis -> collective threat; immediate target -> scapegoat.", "slug": "scapegoating", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime begins with group distress and pressure to project blame onto a target."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A failure, crisis, loss, scandal, conflict, contamination, violence, or disappointment creates strong collective pressure for an immediate responsible target.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Scapegoating substitutes a simple blame story for distributed or inconvenient causality.", "role_mapping": "Complex cause -> displaced source; simple narrative -> projection.", "slug": "scapegoating", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b059_a13_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Groups need responsibility attribution after harm, but under pressure they often prefer emotionally satisfying blame concentration to slower causal accountability. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Causality is uncertain, distributed, technical, systemic, delayed, or politically inconvenient, making a simple blame story more attractive than a causal map.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Causality is uncertain, distributed, technical, systemic, delayed, or politically inconvenient, making a simple blame story more attractive than a causal map.", "Groups need responsibility attribution after harm, but under pressure they often prefer emotionally satisfying blame concentration to slower causal accountability."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Scapegoating", "one_liner": "Channeling collective blame onto a substitute target.", "page_ref": "prime:scapegoating", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Complex cause -> displaced source; simple narrative -> projection.", "slug": "scapegoating", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Scapegoating substitutes a simple blame story for distributed or inconvenient causality."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Causality is uncertain, distributed, technical, systemic, delayed, or politically inconvenient, making a simple blame story more attractive than a causal map.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The target is characteristically visible, vulnerable, and unable to contest collective projection.", "role_mapping": "Outsider or messenger -> target; low power -> vulnerability.", "slug": "scapegoating", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b059_a13_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The scapegoat may be an outsider, minority subgroup, low-status member, messenger, visible operator, previous leader, unlucky participant, or abstract category. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A vulnerable person, subgroup, role, outsider, messenger, or symbolic figure is visible enough to absorb anger but not powerful enough to contest the narrative safely.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A vulnerable person, subgroup, role, outsider, messenger, or symbolic figure is visible enough to absorb anger but not powerful enough to contest the narrative safely.", "The scapegoat may be an outsider, minority subgroup, low-status member, messenger, visible operator, previous leader, unlucky participant, or abstract category."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Scapegoating", "one_liner": "Channeling collective blame onto a substitute target.", "page_ref": "prime:scapegoating", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Outsider or messenger -> target; low power -> vulnerability.", "slug": "scapegoating", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The target is characteristically visible, vulnerable, and unable to contest collective projection."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A vulnerable person, subgroup, role, outsider, messenger, or symbolic figure is visible enough to absorb anger but not powerful enough to contest the narrative safely.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Group narratives and amplification converge hostility onto the selected target.", "role_mapping": "Converging attention -> projection; hostility -> punishment.", "slug": "scapegoating", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b059_a13_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The archetype manages the tension between preserving real grievance and preventing substitute punishment; between group cohesion and target protection; and between accountable action and premature certainty. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Rumor, media, leadership framing, informal talk, algorithmic amplification, ritual, or group identity begins converging attention and hostility toward the target.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Rumor, media, leadership framing, informal talk, algorithmic amplification, ritual, or group identity begins converging attention and hostility toward the target.", "The archetype manages the tension between preserving real grievance and preventing substitute punishment; between group cohesion and target protection; and between accountable action and premature certainty."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Scapegoating", "one_liner": "Channeling collective blame onto a substitute target.", "page_ref": "prime:scapegoating", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Converging attention -> projection; hostility -> punishment.", "slug": "scapegoating", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Group narratives and amplification converge hostility onto the selected target."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Rumor, media, leadership framing, informal talk, algorithmic amplification, ritual, or group identity begins converging attention and hostility toward the target.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Legitimate grievances are redirected away from responsible structures toward the target.", "role_mapping": "Grievance -> distress; redirected blame -> displacement.", "slug": "scapegoating", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b059_a13_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Harmed people have legitimate grievances, but the available narrative redirects those grievances away from responsible structures or decision makers. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Harmed people have legitimate grievances, but the available narrative redirects those grievances away from responsible structures or decision makers."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Scapegoating", "one_liner": "Channeling collective blame onto a substitute target.", "page_ref": "prime:scapegoating", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Grievance -> distress; redirected blame -> displacement.", "slug": "scapegoating", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Legitimate grievances are redirected away from responsible structures toward the target."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Harmed people have legitimate grievances, but the available narrative redirects those grievances away from responsible structures or decision makers.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Sacrificial punishment supplies temporary cohesion by uniting the group against the target.", "role_mapping": "Shared hostility -> cohesion mechanism; expulsion -> sacrifice.", "slug": "scapegoating", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b059_a13_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The archetype manages the tension between preserving real grievance and preventing substitute punishment; between group cohesion and target protection; and between accountable action and premature certainty. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Group cohesion is being restored through shared hostility, humiliation, expulsion, or sacrificial punishment rather than through truth, repair, and accountability.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Group cohesion is being restored through shared hostility, humiliation, expulsion, or sacrificial punishment rather than through truth, repair, and accountability.", "The archetype manages the tension between preserving real grievance and preventing substitute punishment; between group cohesion and target protection; and between accountable action and premature certainty."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Scapegoating", "one_liner": "Channeling collective blame onto a substitute target.", "page_ref": "prime:scapegoating", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Shared hostility -> cohesion mechanism; expulsion -> sacrifice.", "slug": "scapegoating", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Sacrificial punishment supplies temporary cohesion by uniting the group against the target."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Group cohesion is being restored through shared hostility, humiliation, expulsion, or sacrificial punishment rather than through truth, repair, and accountability.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 59, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-059", "ledger_sha256": "a84e472731ce05492015639025bb4918991ef300492470f403fe08783c5b05c1"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Scenario Portfolio Planning", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:scenario_portfolio_planning", "slug": "scenario_portfolio_planning"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 2 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 2}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is forecast lock-in under real uncertainty. A system needs to act, but its planning machinery behaves as if one expected future were known. That hidden future shapes budgets, commitments, hiring, infrastructure, legitimacy claims, and risk posture. When the world resolves differently, the system discovers that it has optimized for a future it did not get.\n\nScenario Portfolio Planning addresses the mismatch between present commitment and future uncertainty. It gives the system a way to make decisions without pretending that ambiguity has disappeared.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system is planning as if one forecast will happen even though unresolved uncertainties could plausibly produce materially different futures."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime constructs multiple plausible future states specifically because they would change present choices.", "role_mapping": "Future conditions -> scenarios; different choices -> scenario implications.", "slug": "scenario_planning", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b059_a14_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The archetype becomes real only when multiple plausible futures change choices. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Several future conditions are plausible and would require different choices.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Several future conditions are plausible and would require different choices.", "The archetype becomes real only when multiple plausible futures change choices."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Scenario Planning", "one_liner": "Construct plausible futures.", "page_ref": "prime:scenario_planning", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Future conditions -> scenarios; different choices -> scenario implications.", "slug": "scenario_planning", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime constructs multiple plausible future states specifically because they would change present choices."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Several future conditions are plausible and would require different choices.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Scenarios can be used when no early signals exist at all.", "slug": "scenario_planning"}], "residual_id": "r:scenario_portfolio_planning:b059_a14_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b059_a14_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Early signals exist but are not yet strong enough to justify a single bet. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Early signals exist but are not yet strong enough to justify a single bet."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Scenarios can be used when no early signals exist at all.", "slug": "scenario_planning"}], "normalized_requirement": "Early signals exist but are not yet strong enough to justify a single bet.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Early signals exist but are not yet strong enough to justify a single bet.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Commitments are long-lived, expensive, reputation-shaping, or hard to reverse.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful for long-lived investments, strategy under regulatory or technological uncertainty, public policy under social and environmental change, institutional planning, and resilience design. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Commitments are long-lived, expensive, reputation-shaping, or hard to reverse. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Commitments are long-lived, expensive, reputation-shaping, or hard to reverse.", "It is especially useful for long-lived investments, strategy under regulatory or technological uncertainty, public policy under social and environmental change, institutional planning, and resilience design."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "Commitments are long-lived, expensive, reputation-shaping, or hard to reverse."}, {"display_text": "Stakeholders disagree about the future but still need to act.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Stakeholders disagree about the future but still need to act. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders disagree about the future but still need to act."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Stakeholders disagree about the future but still need to act."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 59, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-059", "ledger_sha256": "a84e472731ce05492015639025bb4918991ef300492470f403fe08783c5b05c1"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Schema Conflict Resolution", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:schema_conflict_resolution", "slug": "schema_conflict_resolution"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 2, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Multiple live schemas classify or interpret the same objects, events, people, risks, cases, or concepts differently, so actors appear to be coordinating while their categories silently diverge.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Multiple live schemas classify or interpret the same objects, events, people, risks, cases, or concepts differently, so actors appear to be coordinating while their categories silently diverge."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Classification can occur within one shared system and need not involve conflicting groups.", "slug": "classification"}], "residual_id": "r:schema_conflict_resolution:b059_a15_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b059_a15_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Multiple live schemas classify or interpret the same objects, events, people, risks, cases, or concepts differently, so actors appear to be coordinating while their categories silently diverge. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: two groups use different category systems for the same work, data, cases, or domain.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["two groups use different category systems for the same work, data, cases, or domain", "Multiple live schemas classify or interpret the same objects, events, people, risks, cases, or concepts differently, so actors appear to be coordinating while their categories silently diverge."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Classification can occur within one shared system and need not involve conflicting groups.", "slug": "classification"}], "normalized_requirement": "two groups use different category systems for the same work, data, cases, or domain", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "two groups use different category systems for the same work, data, cases, or domain", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P096-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve category labels and an incomplete, ambiguous, or otherwise unclean cross-context mapping relation.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Category labels used across the relevant schemas or operating contexts lack a clean mapping.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must make the mapping defect causal for breakage rather than merely coincident with it.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The unclean category-label mapping causes the selected operational artifact or process to break.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires record creation, transfer, interpretation, or integrity failure.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Records break because the category labels do not map cleanly.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires failure of a cross-actor or cross-system handoff.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Handoffs break because the category labels do not map cleanly.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires invalid, incomparable, or distorted measurement.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Metrics break because the category labels do not map cleanly.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires decision failure or invalid decision support caused by the mapping defect.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "Decisions break because the category labels do not map cleanly.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "An operational record, handoff, metric, or decision breaks because category labels do not map cleanly across schemas or contexts.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "unclean category-label mapping causes operational breakage", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P096-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A schema can have fully interoperable labels.", "slug": "schema"}], "residual_id": "r:schema_conflict_resolution:b059_a15_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b059_a15_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: records, handoffs, metrics, or decisions break because category labels do not map cleanly. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["records, handoffs, metrics, or decisions break because category labels do not map cleanly"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "After applying the bridge, a clean cross-time category mapping would require stable extensions; that contradicts the exact requirement that identical instances receive different labels as cohort practice drifts.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_BRIDGE", "name": "Annotation Drift", "one_liner": "The gradual, undocumented shift over time in how annotators apply an unchanged rubric, so identical instances get different labels — a silent recalibration of a measurement instrument, invisible to within-slice agreement and detectable only by re-annotating frozen gold.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:annotation_drift", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "RELATION_SUBSUMPTION", "kind": "INTERPRETIVE_BRIDGE", "normalized_key": "shifted_label_extension_lacks_clean_cross_context_mapping", "predicate": "A category label whose applied extension changes between classification contexts lacks a clean semantic mapping across those contexts.", "rationale": "The candidate supplies the structural spine and the single emitted qualifier is anchored, atomic, minimal, and does not add a second relation family."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "annotation_drift"}, {"kind": "INTERPRETIVE_BRIDGE", "value": "shifted_label_extension_lacks_clean_cross_context_mapping"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "annotation_drift", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P096-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "The record directly supplies drift-caused longitudinal record failure. One general relation subsumption makes explicit that labels whose extension changes between classification contexts lack a clean semantic identity mapping."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "records, handoffs, metrics, or decisions break because category labels do not map cleanly", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P096-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve two distinct team or actor roles and one shared category pair.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Two teams interpret or use the same pair of categories.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail an equivalence judgment or substitutability assumption by one team.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "One team treats the two categories as equivalent.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the opposed non-equivalence judgment, not merely uncertainty about the mapping.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The other team rejects equivalence and treats the categories as meaningfully different.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "One team treats two categories as equivalent while another team treats the same categories as meaningfully different.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "teams disagree over whether two categories are equivalent", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P096-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "One schema need not be compared with another.", "slug": "schema"}], "residual_id": "r:schema_conflict_resolution:b059_a15_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b059_a15_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: one team assumes two categories are equivalent while another treats them as meaningfully different. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["one team assumes two categories are equivalent while another treats them as meaningfully different"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "One schema need not be compared with another.", "slug": "schema"}], "normalized_requirement": "one team assumes two categories are equivalent while another treats them as meaningfully different", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "one team assumes two categories are equivalent while another treats them as meaningfully different", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P096-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve an integration operation and a distinction present in at least one local source context.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An integration operation would combine schemas, classifications, or operating contexts that contain a local distinction.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must make integration the prospective cause of erasure rather than describe unrelated information loss.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The proposed integration would erase the local distinction.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve both the 'would erase' modality and the distinction's continuing material relevance.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The erasure is a prospective consequence and the local distinction remains important.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires operational or professional-practice relevance.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The local distinction still matters for practice.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires responsibility, audit, ownership, or answerability relevance.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The local distinction still matters for accountability.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires semantic or inferential relevance.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The local distinction still matters for interpretation.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Integrating schemas or contexts would erase a local distinction that still matters for practice, accountability, or interpretation.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "integration would erase a locally important distinction", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P096-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Schema integration can preserve all local distinctions.", "slug": "schema"}], "residual_id": "r:schema_conflict_resolution:b059_a15_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b059_a15_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: integration would erase local distinctions that still matter for practice, accountability, or interpretation. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["integration would erase local distinctions that still matter for practice, accountability, or interpretation"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_GUARDED_EQUIVALENT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Where the collapsed distinction is immaterial to the consumer's interpretation, the candidate remains valid but the source unit does not, locating the sole gap.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Declared Equivalence Mapping", "one_liner": "An explicit, authoritative, versioned assertion that two concepts from different vocabularies are interchangeable for stated purposes — collapsing a cross-scheme distinction to zero for consumers who trust the declaration rather than re-verifying at use-time.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:declared_equivalence_mapping", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O3", "O6"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "collapsed_local_distinction_material_to_interpretation", "predicate": "The distinction collapsed by the contemplated integration remains material to interpretation in that consumer use.", "rationale": "The candidate supplies the structural spine and the single emitted qualifier is anchored, atomic, minimal, and does not add a second relation family."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "declared_equivalence_mapping"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "collapsed_local_distinction_material_to_interpretation"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "declared_equivalence_mapping", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P096-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "The atomic interpretive-materiality guard selects the complete O6 branch while the exact record supplies the integration and collapse spine."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "integration would erase local distinctions that still matter for practice, accountability, or interpretation", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Versioning can maintain full backward compatibility and does not entail drift or semantic conflict.", "slug": "versioning"}], "residual_id": "r:schema_conflict_resolution:b059_a15_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b059_a15_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Multiple live schemas classify or interpret the same objects, events, people, risks, cases, or concepts differently, so actors appear to be coordinating while their categories silently diverge. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: schema drift has created multiple partially compatible versions that now need to interoperate.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["schema drift has created multiple partially compatible versions that now need to interoperate", "Multiple live schemas classify or interpret the same objects, events, people, risks, cases, or concepts differently, so actors appear to be coordinating while their categories silently diverge."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Versioning can maintain full backward compatibility and does not entail drift or semantic conflict.", "slug": "versioning"}], "normalized_requirement": "schema drift has created multiple partially compatible versions that now need to interoperate", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "schema drift has created multiple partially compatible versions that now need to interoperate", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "a shared glossary, taxonomy, data model, ontology, or policy framework is proposed across communities with different meanings.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: a shared glossary, taxonomy, data model, ontology, or policy framework is proposed across communities with different meanings. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["a shared glossary, taxonomy, data model, ontology, or policy framework is proposed across communities with different meanings"]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "a shared glossary, taxonomy, data model, ontology, or policy framework is proposed across communities with different meanings"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 59, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-059", "ledger_sha256": "a84e472731ce05492015639025bb4918991ef300492470f403fe08783c5b05c1"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Schema Update Protocol", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:schema_update_protocol", "slug": "schema_update_protocol"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 1, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 4 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A schema compresses many cases into a usable structure. That compression is useful until the structure starts hiding distinctions that matter or preserving distinctions that no longer do. The structural problem is a drift between the organizing schema and the cases, decisions, or relations it is supposed to organize.\n\nThe problem often shows up indirectly. Users add unofficial tags. Analysts create local categories. Reports become misleading. Support tickets are routed incorrectly. Researchers cannot code cases consistently. Historical comparisons become suspect. These symptoms matter because they show the schema is no longer only a passive representation; it is shaping action through outdated or ill-fitting categories.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A knowledge framework keeps interpreting new or changed cases through old categories, definitions, or relations, causing misclassification, distorted understanding, retrieval failure, duplicated work, or decisions based on obsolete assumptions."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A schema blind spot may be discovered in one decisive case rather than recur.", "slug": "schema_bounded_blind_spot"}], "residual_id": "r:schema_update_protocol:b060_a01_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b060_a01_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Violating cases recur. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Violating cases recur"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A schema blind spot may be discovered in one decisive case rather than recur.", "slug": "schema_bounded_blind_spot"}], "normalized_requirement": "Violating cases recur", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Violating cases recur", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P096-C12", "dnf": [], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [], "predicate": "Category performance degrades.", "resolution": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RESIDUAL", "semantic_scope": "NON_ABSTRACTION", "structural_head": "category performance degrades", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P096-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A new version can be created while category performance remains high.", "slug": "versioning"}], "residual_id": "r:schema_update_protocol:b060_a01_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b060_a01_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Category performance degrades. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Category performance degrades"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RECLASSIFIED", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 1, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A new version can be created while category performance remains high.", "slug": "versioning"}], "normalized_requirement": "Category performance degrades", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RECLASSIFIED", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later candidate-blind atomization classified this remainder as a threshold, parameter, materiality test, or other non-abstraction rather than a catalog gap."}, "predicate": "Category performance degrades", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Versions can change because requirements or presentation changed while the domain remains stable.", "slug": "versioning"}], "residual_id": "r:schema_update_protocol:b060_a01_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b060_a01_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially relevant when the domain has changed: a product line expands, evidence accumulates, social categories shift, a research frame encounters new cases, or old assumptions no longer describe the world. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The underlying domain has changed.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The underlying domain has changed", "It is especially relevant when the domain has changed: a product line expands, evidence accumulates, social categories shift, a research frame encounters new cases, or old assumptions no longer describe the world."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Versions can change because requirements or presentation changed while the domain remains stable.", "slug": "versioning"}], "normalized_requirement": "The underlying domain has changed", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The underlying domain has changed", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P096-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve user, official-schema, and workaround roles.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Users operate with an official schema and maintain one or more workaround practices or artifacts.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the extra-schema location or governance boundary.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The workarounds remain outside rather than being incorporated into the official schema.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail persistence over time or across use, not one ephemeral workaround.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Users preserve or retain the workarounds rather than using only a transient one-off exception.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "Users retain persistent workarounds outside the official schema.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "users retain extra-schema workarounds", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P096-C13-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Versioning can proceed without user workarounds.", "slug": "versioning"}], "residual_id": "r:schema_update_protocol:b060_a01_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b060_a01_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when an existing schema is producing recurring category errors, edge-case pileups, inconsistent judgments, misleading retrieval, or unofficial workarounds. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Users preserve workarounds outside the schema.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Users preserve workarounds outside the schema", "Use this archetype when an existing schema is producing recurring category errors, edge-case pileups, inconsistent judgments, misleading retrieval, or unofficial workarounds."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "If the base language is not treated as the governing formal schema, the source's schema role fails even though Greenspun's pattern remains valid.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_BRIDGE", "name": "Greenspun's Tenth Rule", "one_liner": "The aphorism that any sufficiently complicated C or Fortran program contains an ad hoc, bug-ridden implementation of half of Common Lisp — because features a language withholds do not vanish but migrate inside the program as defective re-implementations.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:greenspuns_tenth_rule", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1", "O2"], "guard_type": "TYPE_SUBSUMPTION", "kind": "INTERPRETIVE_BRIDGE", "normalized_key": "programming_language_construct_system_is_formal_schema", "predicate": "A governed programming language's construct system is a formal schema for programs expressed under it.", "rationale": "The candidate supplies the structural spine and the single emitted qualifier is anchored, atomic, minimal, and does not add a second relation family."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "greenspuns_tenth_rule"}, {"kind": "INTERPRETIVE_BRIDGE", "value": "programming_language_construct_system_is_formal_schema"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "greenspuns_tenth_rule", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P096-C13-U1", "why_it_fits": "The general formal-language-to-schema bridge resolves the only type gap; the candidate directly entails retained workarounds outside the base language's supplied constructs."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Users preserve workarounds outside the schema", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Continuity matters.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this deployment constraint: Continuity matters. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Continuity matters"]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Continuity matters"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 60, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-060", "ledger_sha256": "98d6c528526e116e07206bdc41a067e87d90fc5c6b52caa2b9c49ef0688b85fd"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Scope Creep Containment", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:scope_creep_containment", "slug": "scope_creep_containment"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 6, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 6, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "6 of 7 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 7}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A bounded work perimeter begins with a charter, delivery promise, responsibility envelope, requirement set, or policy scope, but the perimeter expands through a sequence of small additions. Each addition can be defended as adjacent, useful, low-cost, stakeholder-friendly, urgent, or already implied. Because additions are evaluated against the current expanded boundary rather than the original charter, and because removal is socially or procedurally harder than addition, the scope ratchets outward. The result is overloaded delivery, diluted focus, hidden tradeoffs, stakeholder expectation debt, degraded quality, and loss of accountability for the overall trajectory.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A bounded work perimeter begins with a charter, delivery promise, responsibility envelope, requirement set, or policy scope, but the perimeter expands through a sequence of small additions. Each addition can be defended as adjacent, useful, low-cost, stakeholder-friendly, urgent, or already implied. Because additions are evaluated against the current expanded boundary rather than the original charter, and because removal is socially or procedurally harder than addition, the scope ratchets outward. The result is overloaded delivery, diluted focus, hidden tradeoffs, stakeholder expectation debt, degraded quality, and loss of accountability for the overall trajectory."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime requires an initial project or mandate boundary against which later additions can be measured.", "role_mapping": "Initial boundary -> baseline scope; sized outcome -> charter.", "slug": "scope_creep", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b060_a02_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A bounded work perimeter begins with a charter, delivery promise, responsibility envelope, requirement set, or policy scope, but the perimeter expands through a sequence of small additions. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: There is an initial project, release, policy, mandate, contract, service, or responsibility boundary that was sized for a particular capacity and outcome.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["There is an initial project, release, policy, mandate, contract, service, or responsibility boundary that was sized for a particular capacity and outcome.", "A bounded work perimeter begins with a charter, delivery promise, responsibility envelope, requirement set, or policy scope, but the perimeter expands through a sequence of small additions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Scope Creep", "one_liner": "A perimeter ratchets outward through small additions each judged against a drifting current baseline rather than the original charter, with no owner of the trajectory.", "page_ref": "prime:scope_creep", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Initial boundary -> baseline scope; sized outcome -> charter.", "slug": "scope_creep", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime requires an initial project or mandate boundary against which later additions can be measured."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "There is an initial project, release, policy, mandate, contract, service, or responsibility boundary that was sized for a particular capacity and outcome.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Scope creep is driven by an addition-removal asymmetry in which small requests enter with lower friction than pruning or rebaselining.", "role_mapping": "New requests -> increments; removal friction -> asymmetry.", "slug": "scope_creep", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b060_a02_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: New requests can be added informally or with lighter friction than removals, deferrals, or rebaselining decisions. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["New requests can be added informally or with lighter friction than removals, deferrals, or rebaselining decisions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Scope Creep", "one_liner": "A perimeter ratchets outward through small additions each judged against a drifting current baseline rather than the original charter, with no owner of the trajectory.", "page_ref": "prime:scope_creep", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "New requests -> increments; removal friction -> asymmetry.", "slug": "scope_creep", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Scope creep is driven by an addition-removal asymmetry in which small requests enter with lower friction than pruning or rebaselining."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "New requests can be added informally or with lighter friction than removals, deferrals, or rebaselining decisions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Normalization of prior expansion shifts the reference point from the original charter to current enlarged scope.", "role_mapping": "Comparison drift -> moving scope baseline.", "slug": "scope_creep", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b060_a02_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Because additions are evaluated against the current expanded boundary rather than the original charter, and because removal is socially or procedurally harder than addition, the scope ratchets outward. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The comparison point for new requests drifts from the original charter to the already-expanded current scope.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The comparison point for new requests drifts from the original charter to the already-expanded current scope.", "Because additions are evaluated against the current expanded boundary rather than the original charter, and because removal is socially or procedurally harder than addition, the scope ratchets outward."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Scope Creep", "one_liner": "A perimeter ratchets outward through small additions each judged against a drifting current baseline rather than the original charter, with no owner of the trajectory.", "page_ref": "prime:scope_creep", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Comparison drift -> moving scope baseline.", "slug": "scope_creep", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Normalization of prior expansion shifts the reference point from the original charter to current enlarged scope."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The comparison point for new requests drifts from the original charter to the already-expanded current scope.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Locally reasonable additions compose into material expansion of delivery and verification burden.", "role_mapping": "Each addition -> local increment; cumulative perimeter -> global expansion.", "slug": "scope_creep", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b060_a02_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A bounded work perimeter begins with a charter, delivery promise, responsibility envelope, requirement set, or policy scope, but the perimeter expands through a sequence of small additions. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Each addition appears locally reasonable, but cumulative additions change the delivery perimeter, verification burden, coordination surface, or expectation set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Each addition appears locally reasonable, but cumulative additions change the delivery perimeter, verification burden, coordination surface, or expectation set.", "A bounded work perimeter begins with a charter, delivery promise, responsibility envelope, requirement set, or policy scope, but the perimeter expands through a sequence of small additions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Scope Creep", "one_liner": "A perimeter ratchets outward through small additions each judged against a drifting current baseline rather than the original charter, with no owner of the trajectory.", "page_ref": "prime:scope_creep", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Each addition -> local increment; cumulative perimeter -> global expansion.", "slug": "scope_creep", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Locally reasonable additions compose into material expansion of delivery and verification burden."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Each addition appears locally reasonable, but cumulative additions change the delivery perimeter, verification burden, coordination surface, or expectation set.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P096-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a cumulative scope trajectory and the local changes or work state through which it develops.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A scope changes over time and therefore has a longitudinal trajectory distinct from any one current change or work list.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail absence of a designated actor accountable for cumulative scope evolution.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "No role owns responsibility for the longitudinal scope trajectory.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the responsibility-layer distinction rather than treating local approval or delivery as cumulative ownership.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Longitudinal ownership is distinct from approving individual changes or delivering the latest work list.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "No role owns the longitudinal scope trajectory, even if roles approve individual changes or deliver the latest work list.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "longitudinal scope trajectory lacks an owner distinct from local change roles", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P096-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A project can have a dedicated scope owner and still creep through approved increments.", "slug": "scope_creep"}], "residual_id": "r:scope_creep_containment:b060_a02_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b060_a02_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A bounded work perimeter begins with a charter, delivery promise, responsibility envelope, requirement set, or policy scope, but the perimeter expands through a sequence of small additions. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: No role owns the longitudinal scope trajectory as distinct from approving individual changes or delivering the latest work list.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["No role owns the longitudinal scope trajectory as distinct from approving individual changes or delivering the latest work list.", "A bounded work perimeter begins with a charter, delivery promise, responsibility envelope, requirement set, or policy scope, but the perimeter expands through a sequence of small additions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A project can have a dedicated scope owner and still creep through approved increments.", "slug": "scope_creep"}], "normalized_requirement": "No role owns the longitudinal scope trajectory as distinct from approving individual changes or delivering the latest work list.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "No role owns the longitudinal scope trajectory as distinct from approving individual changes or delivering the latest work list.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Dependencies and exceptions accumulating faster than pruning is a direct incremental-expansion mechanism.", "role_mapping": "Accumulating asks -> additions; slow pruning -> removal asymmetry.", "slug": "scope_creep", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b060_a02_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Dependencies, exceptions, edge cases, compliance requests, reporting needs, or integration asks accumulate faster than the system can prune or renegotiate them. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Dependencies, exceptions, edge cases, compliance requests, reporting needs, or integration asks accumulate faster than the system can prune or renegotiate them."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Scope Creep", "one_liner": "A perimeter ratchets outward through small additions each judged against a drifting current baseline rather than the original charter, with no owner of the trajectory.", "page_ref": "prime:scope_creep", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Accumulating asks -> additions; slow pruning -> removal asymmetry.", "slug": "scope_creep", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Dependencies and exceptions accumulating faster than pruning is a direct incremental-expansion mechanism."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Dependencies, exceptions, edge cases, compliance requests, reporting needs, or integration asks accumulate faster than the system can prune or renegotiate them.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The formal objective can remain constant while the work interpreted as necessary to satisfy it expands.", "role_mapping": "Fixed objective -> charter; expanded work -> scope.", "slug": "scope_creep", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b060_a02_c8", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A bounded work perimeter begins with a charter, delivery promise, responsibility envelope, requirement set, or policy scope, but the perimeter expands through a sequence of small additions. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The formal objective may remain unchanged even though the work required to satisfy it has expanded materially.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The formal objective may remain unchanged even though the work required to satisfy it has expanded materially.", "A bounded work perimeter begins with a charter, delivery promise, responsibility envelope, requirement set, or policy scope, but the perimeter expands through a sequence of small additions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Scope Creep", "one_liner": "A perimeter ratchets outward through small additions each judged against a drifting current baseline rather than the original charter, with no owner of the trajectory.", "page_ref": "prime:scope_creep", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Fixed objective -> charter; expanded work -> scope.", "slug": "scope_creep", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The formal objective can remain constant while the work interpreted as necessary to satisfy it expands."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The formal objective may remain unchanged even though the work required to satisfy it has expanded materially.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [8], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Stakeholders experience refusal as a loss, while addition is framed as responsiveness or collaboration.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Each addition can be defended as adjacent, useful, low-cost, stakeholder-friendly, urgent, or already implied. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Stakeholders experience refusal as a loss, while addition is framed as responsiveness or collaboration. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders experience refusal as a loss, while addition is framed as responsiveness or collaboration.", "Each addition can be defended as adjacent, useful, low-cost, stakeholder-friendly, urgent, or already implied."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Stakeholders experience refusal as a loss, while addition is framed as responsiveness or collaboration."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 60, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-060", "ledger_sha256": "98d6c528526e116e07206bdc41a067e87d90fc5c6b52caa2b9c49ef0688b85fd"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Scoped Experimentation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:scoped_experimentation", "slug": "scoped_experimentation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 2 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 2}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a conflict between learning and exposure. The system needs contact with reality to learn how a change behaves, but that contact can produce harm, disruption, lock-in, unfairness, privacy loss, operational failure, or political commitment before the change is justified.\n\nWithout this archetype, organizations often fall into one of two failures. They either avoid action because uncertainty feels too dangerous, or they roll out broadly and discover failure after the blast radius is already large. A third failure is the vague pilot: a small trial with no clear learning question, no stop condition, no safety guardrails, and no decision rule for what happens next.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "An experiment, change, policy, feature, treatment, market move, or operating practice may generate valuable learning, but system-wide application would create unacceptable uncertainty, harm, cost, reputational risk, operational disruption, ethical exposure, or irreversible consequences."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P096-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a decision and a context-external evidentiary basis offered to settle it.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A decision is being evaluated using analysis, simulation, precedent, or equivalent evidence produced outside direct behavior in the target context.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail insufficiency for settlement rather than evidence that is merely incomplete but already decisive.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The context-external evidence alone cannot settle the decision.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve target-context behavior as decision-relevant, not an incidental observation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Behavior in the actual target context is relevant to the decision's outcome.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must make context dependence causal for epistemic insufficiency.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The relevance of behavior in context is why the other evidence alone cannot settle the decision.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Analysis, simulation, or precedent alone cannot settle a decision because behavior in the actual context matters to its outcome.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "context-external evidence cannot settle a decision whose outcome depends on in-context behavior", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P096-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Experiments can test a well-analyzed causal estimate and need not follow analytic exhaustion.", "slug": "experimental_design"}], "residual_id": "r:scoped_experimentation:b060_a03_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b060_a03_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is weak when effects are irreversible even at small scale, when monitoring cannot catch harm early enough, or when the small scope is so unrepresentative that it cannot answer the decision question. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A decision cannot be settled by analysis, simulation, or precedent alone because behavior in context matters.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A decision cannot be settled by analysis, simulation, or precedent alone because behavior in context matters.", "It is weak when effects are irreversible even at small scale, when monitoring cannot catch harm early enough, or when the small scope is so unrepresentative that it cannot answer the decision question."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A team can apply the gate without first offering analysis or precedent as sufficient, so O1 is contingent while O2 through O4 remain necessary.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Problem-Solution Fit", "one_liner": "The lean-startup gate that demands cheap, need-side evidence — a real, important problem for an identified user, and a solution preferred over their current workaround — before committing to build at scale, guarding against 'build it and they will come.'", "page_ref": "domain_specific:problem_solution_fit", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "OTHER", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "nonbehavioral_evidence_offered_as_gate_basis", "predicate": "The team offers analysis, simulation, precedent, or equivalent non-behavioral evidence as sufficient for the gate decision.", "rationale": "The candidate supplies the structural spine and the single emitted qualifier is anchored, atomic, minimal, and does not add a second relation family."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "problem_solution_fit"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "nonbehavioral_evidence_offered_as_gate_basis"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "problem_solution_fit", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P096-C15-U1", "why_it_fits": "One atomic guard supplies the actual offer of non-behavioral evidence; the candidate already makes it insufficient because target-user evidence is necessary."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_SYNTHESIS", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Without an actual offer of nonbehavioral evidence, validated learning still exists but O1 is false; with that offer, the admissibility filter makes behavior-dependent insufficiency unavoidable.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Validated Learning", "one_liner": "Denominate an early-stage venture's progress in a single currency — behavioural evidence from real customers that moves a specific hypothesis — and gate every candidate sign of progress through an admissible-evidence filter that discounts activity, vanity metrics, and stated intentions.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:validated_learning", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "OTHER", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "nonbehavioral_evidence_offered_as_hypothesis_basis", "predicate": "Analysis, stated intention, or another nonbehavioral signal is offered as sufficient to update the venture hypothesis.", "rationale": "The candidate supplies the structural spine and the single emitted qualifier is anchored, atomic, minimal, and does not add a second relation family."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "validated_learning"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "nonbehavioral_evidence_offered_as_hypothesis_basis"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "validated_learning", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P096-C15-U1", "why_it_fits": "A direct classification overstates O1. One atomic evidentiary-offer guard supplies that contingent fact, while the exact admissibility filter directly supplies behavioral relevance and the insufficiency relation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A decision cannot be settled by analysis, simulation, or precedent alone because behavior in context matters.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An experiment can be harmless and need no rollout-risk boundary.", "slug": "experimental_design"}], "residual_id": "r:scoped_experimentation:b060_a03_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b060_a03_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The system needs contact with reality to learn, but the same contact can harm people, degrade service, contaminate evidence, trigger irreversible effects, or create political and operational commitments before the learning is justified. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Full rollout would expose too many people, assets, users, patients, customers, services, or dependent systems before evidence exists.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Full rollout would expose too many people, assets, users, patients, customers, services, or dependent systems before evidence exists.", "The system needs contact with reality to learn, but the same contact can harm people, degrade service, contaminate evidence, trigger irreversible effects, or create political and operational commitments before the learning is justified."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An experiment can be harmless and need no rollout-risk boundary.", "slug": "experimental_design"}], "normalized_requirement": "Full rollout would expose too many people, assets, users, patients, customers, services, or dependent systems before evidence exists.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Full rollout would expose too many people, assets, users, patients, customers, services, or dependent systems before evidence exists.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The change can be bounded by population, unit, geography, traffic share, time, resource budget, legal permission, or operational surface.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The pattern is especially appropriate when the experiment can be bounded by population, geography, service site, traffic share, market, department, resource budget, time window, legal permission, or operational process. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: The change can be bounded by population, unit, geography, traffic share, time, resource budget, legal permission, or operational surface. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The change can be bounded by population, unit, geography, traffic share, time, resource budget, legal permission, or operational surface.", "The pattern is especially appropriate when the experiment can be bounded by population, geography, service site, traffic share, market, department, resource budget, time window, legal permission, or operational process."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "The change can be bounded by population, unit, geography, traffic share, time, resource budget, legal permission, or operational surface."}, {"display_text": "Monitoring and rollback are possible while the experiment remains small.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is weak when effects are irreversible even at small scale, when monitoring cannot catch harm early enough, or when the small scope is so unrepresentative that it cannot answer the decision question. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: Monitoring and rollback are possible while the experiment remains small. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Monitoring and rollback are possible while the experiment remains small.", "It is weak when effects are irreversible even at small scale, when monitoring cannot catch harm early enough, or when the small scope is so unrepresentative that it cannot answer the decision question."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Monitoring and rollback are possible while the experiment remains small."}, {"display_text": "Decision makers need evidence strong enough to decide whether to stop, revise, expand, or institutionalize the change.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is weak when effects are irreversible even at small scale, when monitoring cannot catch harm early enough, or when the small scope is so unrepresentative that it cannot answer the decision question. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: Decision makers need evidence strong enough to decide whether to stop, revise, expand, or institutionalize the change. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Decision makers need evidence strong enough to decide whether to stop, revise, expand, or institutionalize the change.", "It is weak when effects are irreversible even at small scale, when monitoring cannot catch harm early enough, or when the small scope is so unrepresentative that it cannot answer the decision question."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Decision makers need evidence strong enough to decide whether to stop, revise, expand, or institutionalize the change."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 60, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-060", "ledger_sha256": "98d6c528526e116e07206bdc41a067e87d90fc5c6b52caa2b9c49ef0688b85fd"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Search Space Pruning", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:search_space_pruning", "slug": "search_space_pruning"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 0, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 0 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 0 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 0}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a mismatch between the size of the possible search space and the capacity available to explore it. The space may be combinatorial, legally complex, clinically uncertain, strategically broad, or simply too large for human attention.\n\nThe pressure to narrow is legitimate: without pruning, the search may stall, waste resources, or bury the best candidates among many impossible ones. The danger is equally real: a bad pruning rule can remove the rare, unconventional, high-value, or safety-critical option before anyone notices.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "The possible solution, decision, diagnosis, or action space is too large to explore exhaustively, and many options are infeasible, dominated, unsafe, redundant, irrelevant, or too low value to justify equal attention."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [], "condition_structure": "DISJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Combinatorial growth.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this source condition requiring clarification: Combinatorial growth. The wording is retained for source review rather than assigned a stronger semantic role.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Combinatorial growth"]}, "function": "MALFORMED", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because the source wording is not structurally clear enough to support a formal trigger role without clarification.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "Combinatorial growth"}, {"display_text": "High evaluation cost.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this source condition requiring clarification: High evaluation cost. The wording is retained for source review rather than assigned a stronger semantic role.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["High evaluation cost"]}, "function": "MALFORMED", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because the source wording is not structurally clear enough to support a formal trigger role without clarification.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "High evaluation cost"}, {"display_text": "Known hard constraints.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It fits especially well when some possibilities can be ruled out because they violate hard constraints, cannot feasibly work, are dominated by better options, create unacceptable risk, or are too unlikely to justify equal attention. In this archetype, the relevant source condition requiring clarification is: Known hard constraints. The wording is retained for source review rather than assigned a stronger semantic role.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Known hard constraints", "It fits especially well when some possibilities can be ruled out because they violate hard constraints, cannot feasibly work, are dominated by better options, create unacceptable risk, or are too unlikely to justify equal attention."]}, "function": "MALFORMED", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because the source wording is not structurally clear enough to support a formal trigger role without clarification.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Known hard constraints"}, {"display_text": "Dominated options.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The possible solution, decision, diagnosis, or action space is too large to explore exhaustively, and many options are infeasible, dominated, unsafe, redundant, irrelevant, or too low value to justify equal attention. In this archetype, the relevant source condition requiring clarification is: Dominated options. The wording is retained for source review rather than assigned a stronger semantic role.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Dominated options", "The possible solution, decision, diagnosis, or action space is too large to explore exhaustively, and many options are infeasible, dominated, unsafe, redundant, irrelevant, or too low value to justify equal attention."]}, "function": "MALFORMED", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because the source wording is not structurally clear enough to support a formal trigger role without clarification.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Dominated options"}, {"display_text": "Risky exploration.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this source condition requiring clarification: Risky exploration. The wording is retained for source review rather than assigned a stronger semantic role.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Risky exploration"]}, "function": "MALFORMED", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because the source wording is not structurally clear enough to support a formal trigger role without clarification.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Risky exploration"}, {"display_text": "Decision overload.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this source condition requiring clarification: Decision overload. The wording is retained for source review rather than assigned a stronger semantic role.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Decision overload"]}, "function": "MALFORMED", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because the source wording is not structurally clear enough to support a formal trigger role without clarification.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Decision overload"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 60, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-060", "ledger_sha256": "98d6c528526e116e07206bdc41a067e87d90fc5c6b52caa2b9c49ef0688b85fd"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Second-System Complexity Restraint", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:second_system_complexity_restraint", "slug": "second_system_complexity_restraint"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A successor system is being designed after a constrained first success, but the removal of the old constraints releases accumulated wants faster than the design, delivery, maintenance, and adoption capacity can evaluate or absorb them.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A successor system is being designed after a constrained first success, but the removal of the old constraints releases accumulated wants faster than the design, delivery, maintenance, and adoption capacity can evaluate or absorb them."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime begins with a successful constrained first system whose visible omissions invite a more ambitious successor.", "role_mapping": "First version -> first system; gaps and hacks -> deferred ambitions.", "slug": "second_system_effect", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b060_a05_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A first version, prototype, pilot, or legacy system succeeded while leaving many visible gaps, hacks, manual supports, or deferred requests. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A first version, prototype, pilot, or legacy system succeeded while leaving many visible gaps, hacks, manual supports, or deferred requests."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Second-System Effect", "one_liner": "When load-bearing constraints are lifted but capability is retained, a stockpile of postponed ambitions floods the successor, producing overengineering.", "page_ref": "prime:second_system_effect", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "First version -> first system; gaps and hacks -> deferred ambitions.", "slug": "second_system_effect", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime begins with a successful constrained first system whose visible omissions invite a more ambitious successor."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A first version, prototype, pilot, or legacy system succeeded while leaving many visible gaps, hacks, manual supports, or deferred requests.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Treating the successor as the chance to add every deferred feature is the canonical mechanism.", "role_mapping": "Everything lacked -> accumulated ambitions; successor -> second system.", "slug": "second_system_effect", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b060_a05_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A successor system is being designed after a constrained first success, but the removal of the old constraints releases accumulated wants faster than the design, delivery, maintenance, and adoption capacity can evaluate or absorb them. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Stakeholders treat the successor as the once-in-a-generation chance to add everything the first system lacked.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders treat the successor as the once-in-a-generation chance to add everything the first system lacked.", "A successor system is being designed after a constrained first success, but the removal of the old constraints releases accumulated wants faster than the design, delivery, maintenance, and adoption capacity can evaluate or absorb them."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Second-System Effect", "one_liner": "When load-bearing constraints are lifted but capability is retained, a stockpile of postponed ambitions floods the successor, producing overengineering.", "page_ref": "prime:second_system_effect", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Everything lacked -> accumulated ambitions; successor -> second system.", "slug": "second_system_effect", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Treating the successor as the chance to add every deferred feature is the canonical mechanism."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Stakeholders treat the successor as the once-in-a-generation chance to add everything the first system lacked.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires forgetting that first-system constraints protected focus and launchability.", "role_mapping": "Old constraints -> focusing bounds; dismissed obstacles -> lost discipline.", "slug": "second_system_effect", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b060_a05_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The old constraints are described only as obstacles, even though they also limited scope, forced prioritization, and protected launchability. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The old constraints are described only as obstacles, even though they also limited scope, forced prioritization, and protected launchability."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Second-System Effect", "one_liner": "When load-bearing constraints are lifted but capability is retained, a stockpile of postponed ambitions floods the successor, producing overengineering.", "page_ref": "prime:second_system_effect", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Old constraints -> focusing bounds; dismissed obstacles -> lost discipline.", "slug": "second_system_effect", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires forgetting that first-system constraints protected focus and launchability."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The old constraints are described only as obstacles, even though they also limited scope, forced prioritization, and protected launchability.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Second-system overreach can come from one large architectural ambition without conflating all listed work types.", "slug": "second_system_effect"}], "residual_id": "r:second_system_complexity_restraint:b060_a05_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b060_a05_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Builders conflate parity with improvement, technical cleanup, architecture expansion, new features, and strategic repositioning. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Builders conflate parity with improvement, technical cleanup, architecture expansion, new features, and strategic repositioning."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Second-system overreach can come from one large architectural ambition without conflating all listed work types.", "slug": "second_system_effect"}], "normalized_requirement": "Builders conflate parity with improvement, technical cleanup, architecture expansion, new features, and strategic repositioning.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Builders conflate parity with improvement, technical cleanup, architecture expansion, new features, and strategic repositioning.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Premature generality, flexibility, and completeness before re-establishing core value are defining symptoms.", "role_mapping": "Generality -> complexity load; core value -> first-system function.", "slug": "second_system_effect", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b060_a05_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A successor system is being designed after a constrained first success, but the removal of the old constraints releases accumulated wants faster than the design, delivery, maintenance, and adoption capacity can evaluate or absorb them. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Early design conversations emphasize generality, flexibility, future-proofing, and completeness before the successor has re-earned the first system’s core value.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Early design conversations emphasize generality, flexibility, future-proofing, and completeness before the successor has re-earned the first system’s core value.", "A successor system is being designed after a constrained first success, but the removal of the old constraints releases accumulated wants faster than the design, delivery, maintenance, and adoption capacity can evaluate or absorb them."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Second-System Effect", "one_liner": "When load-bearing constraints are lifted but capability is retained, a stockpile of postponed ambitions floods the successor, producing overengineering.", "page_ref": "prime:second_system_effect", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Generality -> complexity load; core value -> first-system function.", "slug": "second_system_effect", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Premature generality, flexibility, and completeness before re-establishing core value are defining symptoms."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Early design conversations emphasize generality, flexibility, future-proofing, and completeness before the successor has re-earned the first system’s core value.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A rewrite, second release, scaled version, replatforming, reorganization, or policy revision is authorized with more budget, confidence, tools, or political cover than the first effort had.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A successor system is being designed after a constrained first success, but the removal of the old constraints releases accumulated wants faster than the design, delivery, maintenance, and adoption capacity can evaluate or absorb them. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: A rewrite, second release, scaled version, replatforming, reorganization, or policy revision is authorized with more budget, confidence, tools, or political cover than the first effort had. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A rewrite, second release, scaled version, replatforming, reorganization, or policy revision is authorized with more budget, confidence, tools, or political cover than the first effort had.", "A successor system is being designed after a constrained first success, but the removal of the old constraints releases accumulated wants faster than the design, delivery, maintenance, and adoption capacity can evaluate or absorb them."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "A rewrite, second release, scaled version, replatforming, reorganization, or policy revision is authorized with more budget, confidence, tools, or political cover than the first effort had."}, {"display_text": "The first system’s users, operators, or support staff are depending on continuity while the successor becomes increasingly ambitious.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A successor system is being designed after a constrained first success, but the removal of the old constraints releases accumulated wants faster than the design, delivery, maintenance, and adoption capacity can evaluate or absorb them. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The first system’s users, operators, or support staff are depending on continuity while the successor becomes increasingly ambitious. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The first system’s users, operators, or support staff are depending on continuity while the successor becomes increasingly ambitious.", "A successor system is being designed after a constrained first success, but the removal of the old constraints releases accumulated wants faster than the design, delivery, maintenance, and adoption capacity can evaluate or absorb them."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "The first system’s users, operators, or support staff are depending on continuity while the successor becomes increasingly ambitious."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 60, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-060", "ledger_sha256": "98d6c528526e116e07206bdc41a067e87d90fc5c6b52caa2b9c49ef0688b85fd"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Selection Bias Correction", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:selection_bias_correction", "slug": "selection_bias_correction"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 2 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 2}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Selection bias is generated by a pathway, not merely by unequal counts. A target unit must be eligible, reachable, invited, willing, persistent, visible, recorded, and retained in analysis. Variables that affect passage may also affect the outcome, and conditioning on passage can create associations that do not exist in the target. Survivors can make strategies look safer; respondents can make services look more satisfactory; published successes can make interventions look more reliable; and convenient records can redirect resources away from invisible need.\n\nThe observed sample alone often cannot reveal the distortion because the missing cases are absent by definition. Correction therefore depends on frame data, auxiliary variables, follow-up evidence, causal assumptions, and explicit bounds. A second structural danger is positivity failure: some target regions have no plausible observed analog. Mathematical weighting cannot create information there. A mature response distinguishes imbalance that can be corrected, uncertainty that can be bounded, and absence that requires recollection or narrower claims.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Observed evidence has passed through an inclusion pathway related to the outcome or exposure, making the observed sample systematically unrepresentative of the target."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "This branch preserves the complete remedy-free diagnostic route; goals, feasibility clauses, gates, deployment constraints, and supporting context remain outside the DNF."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Selection bias necessarily makes inclusion or observation depend on variables related to exposure and outcome, directly entailing the condition.", "role_mapping": "The selection mechanism maps to inclusion or visibility; exposure-outcome variables map to the variables governing differential admission.", "slug": "selection_bias", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "ext001_selection_bias_correction_a01", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored structural_problem, prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: Inclusion, visibility, response, survival, publication, or retention depends on variables related to the outcome or exposure.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Inclusion, visibility, response, survival, publication, or retention depends on variables related to the outcome or exposure."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Selection Bias", "one_liner": "Skewed sampling.", "page_ref": "prime:selection_bias", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "The selection mechanism maps to inclusion or visibility; exposure-outcome variables map to the variables governing differential admission.", "slug": "selection_bias", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Selection bias necessarily makes inclusion or observation depend on variables related to exposure and outcome, directly entailing the condition."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Inclusion, visibility, response, survival, publication, or retention depends on variables related to the outcome or exposure.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Every selection-bias instance distinguishes an observed sample from an inferential target and makes the former systematically unrepresentative of the latter.", "role_mapping": "The analyzed sample maps to the observed sample; the inferential target maps to the target population.", "slug": "selection_bias", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "ext001_selection_bias_correction_a02", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored structural_problem, prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: The observed sample therefore differs systematically from the target population.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The observed sample therefore differs systematically from the target population."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Selection Bias", "one_liner": "Skewed sampling.", "page_ref": "prime:selection_bias", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "The analyzed sample maps to the observed sample; the inferential target maps to the target population.", "slug": "selection_bias", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Every selection-bias instance distinguishes an observed sample from an inferential target and makes the former systematically unrepresentative of the latter."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The observed sample therefore differs systematically from the target population.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Frame data, auxiliary variables, follow-up evidence, overlap, or credible bounds are available.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored structural_problem, prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: Frame data, auxiliary variables, follow-up evidence, overlap, or credible bounds are available. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Frame data, auxiliary variables, follow-up evidence, overlap, or credible bounds are available.", "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored structural_problem, prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Frame data, auxiliary variables, follow-up evidence, overlap, or credible bounds are available."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"candidate_ledger_sha256": "96f72d2139077fd57bf795048ebef33b3fd574b20963170080ec916b5b3b92fe", "extension_id": "new-archetypes-extension-001", "ledger_id": "prime-production-v1.2-extension-001", "ledger_sha256": "9644520614744632d1d36da44b1acd77ce432852c6083eb871203521c166efce"}, "base_projection_sha256": "841e0c7f3cb8e8054475ad29a8a14745a416b4fc115559a44878b94292e673ec", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "ca09ed9fe1598ce7072755b530de5553f5ee0a7cd64ae82d9e4a4e2149a37788", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Selection–Transmission Change Attribution", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:selection_transmission_change_attribution", "slug": "selection_transmission_change_attribution"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 5, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A population-level weighted mean changes, but the observer cannot tell whether the shift is caused by differential weighting of units, within-unit change, or a mixture of both, so explanations and interventions target the wrong level.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A population-level weighted mean changes, but the observer cannot tell whether the shift is caused by differential weighting of units, within-unit change, or a mixture of both, so explanations and interventions target the wrong level."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact decomposition begins with change in a weighted aggregate trait or performance mean across states.", "role_mapping": "Metric change -> aggregate delta; periods -> two states.", "slug": "selection_vs_transmission_decomposition", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b060_a06_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A population-level weighted mean changes, but the observer cannot tell whether the shift is caused by differential weighting of units, within-unit change, or a mixture of both, so explanations and interventions target the wrong level. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: An average, rate, score, trait, performance metric, risk level, or capability changes across two states or periods.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["An average, rate, score, trait, performance metric, risk level, or capability changes across two states or periods.", "A population-level weighted mean changes, but the observer cannot tell whether the shift is caused by differential weighting of units, within-unit change, or a mixture of both, so explanations and interventions target the wrong level."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Selection Vs Transmission Decomposition", "one_liner": "A change in a population's weighted mean splits exactly into a selection term (differential weighting of units) and a transmission term (units changing within themselves).", "page_ref": "prime:selection_vs_transmission_decomposition", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Metric change -> aggregate delta; periods -> two states.", "slug": "selection_vs_transmission_decomposition", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact decomposition begins with change in a weighted aggregate trait or performance mean across states."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "An average, rate, score, trait, performance metric, risk level, or capability changes across two states or periods.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Unequal shares, survival, or influence weights generate the selection/composition term.", "role_mapping": "Unit weights -> contribution shares.", "slug": "selection_vs_transmission_decomposition", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b060_a06_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A population-level weighted mean changes, but the observer cannot tell whether the shift is caused by differential weighting of units, within-unit change, or a mixture of both, so explanations and interventions target the wrong level. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Units have unequal weights, shares, survival probabilities, exposure, participation, frequency, or influence.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Units have unequal weights, shares, survival probabilities, exposure, participation, frequency, or influence.", "A population-level weighted mean changes, but the observer cannot tell whether the shift is caused by differential weighting of units, within-unit change, or a mixture of both, so explanations and interventions target the wrong level."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Selection Vs Transmission Decomposition", "one_liner": "A change in a population's weighted mean splits exactly into a selection term (differential weighting of units) and a transmission term (units changing within themselves).", "page_ref": "prime:selection_vs_transmission_decomposition", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Unit weights -> contribution shares.", "slug": "selection_vs_transmission_decomposition", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Unequal shares, survival, or influence weights generate the selection/composition term."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Units have unequal weights, shares, survival probabilities, exposure, participation, frequency, or influence.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Within-unit learning, adaptation, or degradation generates the transmission term.", "role_mapping": "Internal change -> within-unit delta.", "slug": "selection_vs_transmission_decomposition", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b060_a06_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Aggregate change is one number, but it is produced by two structurally different channels: the population can change by reweighting its units, and units can change within themselves. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Units can also change internally between states through learning, degradation, adaptation, mutation, repair, or behavioral response.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Units can also change internally between states through learning, degradation, adaptation, mutation, repair, or behavioral response.", "Aggregate change is one number, but it is produced by two structurally different channels: the population can change by reweighting its units, and units can change within themselves."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Selection Vs Transmission Decomposition", "one_liner": "A change in a population's weighted mean splits exactly into a selection term (differential weighting of units) and a transmission term (units changing within themselves).", "page_ref": "prime:selection_vs_transmission_decomposition", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Internal change -> within-unit delta.", "slug": "selection_vs_transmission_decomposition", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Within-unit learning, adaptation, or degradation generates the transmission term."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Units can also change internally between states through learning, degradation, adaptation, mutation, repair, or behavioral response.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Entry, exit, growth, and persistence alter weights and therefore the composition component.", "role_mapping": "Differential persistence -> selection weight change.", "slug": "selection_vs_transmission_decomposition", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b060_a06_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Aggregate change is one number, but it is produced by two structurally different channels: the population can change by reweighting its units, and units can change within themselves. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Entry, exit, growth, shrinkage, or differential persistence changes which units dominate the aggregate.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Entry, exit, growth, shrinkage, or differential persistence changes which units dominate the aggregate.", "Aggregate change is one number, but it is produced by two structurally different channels: the population can change by reweighting its units, and units can change within themselves."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Selection Vs Transmission Decomposition", "one_liner": "A change in a population's weighted mean splits exactly into a selection term (differential weighting of units) and a transmission term (units changing within themselves).", "page_ref": "prime:selection_vs_transmission_decomposition", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Differential persistence -> selection weight change.", "slug": "selection_vs_transmission_decomposition", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Entry, exit, growth, and persistence alter weights and therefore the composition component."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Entry, exit, growth, shrinkage, or differential persistence changes which units dominate the aggregate.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Selection-driven and within-unit-driven change imply different causal interpretations and responses.", "role_mapping": "Composition -> selection response; internal change -> transmission response.", "slug": "selection_vs_transmission_decomposition", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b060_a06_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A population-level weighted mean changes, but the observer cannot tell whether the shift is caused by differential weighting of units, within-unit change, or a mixture of both, so explanations and interventions target the wrong level. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The needed response differs depending on whether composition or within-unit transformation is driving the change.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The needed response differs depending on whether composition or within-unit transformation is driving the change.", "A population-level weighted mean changes, but the observer cannot tell whether the shift is caused by differential weighting of units, within-unit change, or a mixture of both, so explanations and interventions target the wrong level."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Selection Vs Transmission Decomposition", "one_liner": "A change in a population's weighted mean splits exactly into a selection term (differential weighting of units) and a transmission term (units changing within themselves).", "page_ref": "prime:selection_vs_transmission_decomposition", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Composition -> selection response; internal change -> transmission response.", "slug": "selection_vs_transmission_decomposition", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Selection-driven and within-unit-driven change imply different causal interpretations and responses."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The needed response differs depending on whether composition or within-unit transformation is driving the change.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Decision-makers are tempted to interpret the aggregate change as a uniform population improvement or decline.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Aggregate change is one number, but it is produced by two structurally different channels: the population can change by reweighting its units, and units can change within themselves. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Decision-makers are tempted to interpret the aggregate change as a uniform population improvement or decline. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Decision-makers are tempted to interpret the aggregate change as a uniform population improvement or decline.", "Aggregate change is one number, but it is produced by two structurally different channels: the population can change by reweighting its units, and units can change within themselves."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Decision-makers are tempted to interpret the aggregate change as a uniform population improvement or decline."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 60, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-060", "ledger_sha256": "98d6c528526e116e07206bdc41a067e87d90fc5c6b52caa2b9c49ef0688b85fd"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Selective Legacy Integration", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:selective_legacy_integration", "slug": "selective_legacy_integration"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 5, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A successor organization, system, role structure, or practice regime must replace or transform a predecessor, but the predecessor contains tacit knowledge, trusted relationships, provenance, symbolic continuity, or identity-defining practices that will be lost if the transition is treated as simple replacement.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A successor organization, system, role structure, or practice regime must replace or transform a predecessor, but the predecessor contains tacit knowledge, trusted relationships, provenance, symbolic continuity, or identity-defining practices that will be lost if the transition is treated as simple replacement."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime begins at a migration, merger, or successor boundary between old and new systems.", "role_mapping": "Before/after -> predecessor/successor; transition -> integration boundary.", "slug": "legacy_integration", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b060_a07_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A successor organization, system, role structure, or practice regime must replace or transform a predecessor, but the predecessor contains tacit knowledge, trusted relationships, provenance, symbolic continuity, or identity-defining practices that will be lost if the transition is treated as simple replacement. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A merger, acquisition, reorganization, leadership transition, regime change, or platform migration creates a before/after boundary.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A merger, acquisition, reorganization, leadership transition, regime change, or platform migration creates a before/after boundary.", "A successor organization, system, role structure, or practice regime must replace or transform a predecessor, but the predecessor contains tacit knowledge, trusted relationships, provenance, symbolic continuity, or identity-defining practices that will be lost if the transition is treated as simple replacement."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Legacy Integration", "one_liner": "Maintains knowledge and identity across organizational discontinuities.", "page_ref": "prime:legacy_integration", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Before/after -> predecessor/successor; transition -> integration boundary.", "slug": "legacy_integration", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime begins at a migration, merger, or successor boundary between old and new systems."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A merger, acquisition, reorganization, leadership transition, regime change, or platform migration creates a before/after boundary.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Undocumented operational knowledge and relationships are the legacy assets that literal migration misses.", "role_mapping": "Inherited routines -> tacit legacy; new design -> successor.", "slug": "legacy_integration", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b060_a07_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: People depend on inherited routines, records, relationships, or meanings that are not fully documented in the new design. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["People depend on inherited routines, records, relationships, or meanings that are not fully documented in the new design."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Legacy Integration", "one_liner": "Maintains knowledge and identity across organizational discontinuities.", "page_ref": "prime:legacy_integration", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Inherited routines -> tacit legacy; new design -> successor.", "slug": "legacy_integration", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Undocumented operational knowledge and relationships are the legacy assets that literal migration misses."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "People depend on inherited routines, records, relationships, or meanings that are not fully documented in the new design.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The predecessor's accumulated trust and identity can be required for successor legitimacy.", "role_mapping": "Recognized predecessor -> trust source; successor -> inheritor.", "slug": "legacy_integration", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b060_a07_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The system must cross a rupture boundary without either freezing the predecessor in place or erasing the dependencies, knowledge, and identity that make continuity meaningful. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The successor needs legitimacy with stakeholders who still recognize the predecessor as meaningful or trustworthy.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The successor needs legitimacy with stakeholders who still recognize the predecessor as meaningful or trustworthy.", "The system must cross a rupture boundary without either freezing the predecessor in place or erasing the dependencies, knowledge, and identity that make continuity meaningful."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Legacy Integration", "one_liner": "Maintains knowledge and identity across organizational discontinuities.", "page_ref": "prime:legacy_integration", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Recognized predecessor -> trust source; successor -> inheritor.", "slug": "legacy_integration", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The predecessor's accumulated trust and identity can be required for successor legitimacy."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The successor needs legitimacy with stakeholders who still recognize the predecessor as meaningful or trustworthy.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Business rules and cultural memory that cannot be discarded safely are defining legacy value.", "role_mapping": "Archive or practice -> legacy substrate; unsafe loss -> preservation obligation.", "slug": "legacy_integration", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b060_a07_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A successor organization, system, role structure, or practice regime must replace or transform a predecessor, but the predecessor contains tacit knowledge, trusted relationships, provenance, symbolic continuity, or identity-defining practices that will be lost if the transition is treated as simple replacement. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A legacy system, policy, archive, community, or practice contains business rules or cultural memory that cannot be discarded safely.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A legacy system, policy, archive, community, or practice contains business rules or cultural memory that cannot be discarded safely.", "A successor organization, system, role structure, or practice regime must replace or transform a predecessor, but the predecessor contains tacit knowledge, trusted relationships, provenance, symbolic continuity, or identity-defining practices that will be lost if the transition is treated as simple replacement."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Legacy Integration", "one_liner": "Maintains knowledge and identity across organizational discontinuities.", "page_ref": "prime:legacy_integration", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Archive or practice -> legacy substrate; unsafe loss -> preservation obligation.", "slug": "legacy_integration", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Business rules and cultural memory that cannot be discarded safely are defining legacy value."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A legacy system, policy, archive, community, or practice contains business rules or cultural memory that cannot be discarded safely.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A replacement plan without an explicit account of what must survive instantiates the central integration gap.", "role_mapping": "Sunset plan -> transition; missing memory account -> selective-integration failure.", "slug": "legacy_integration", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b060_a07_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A successor organization, system, role structure, or practice regime must replace or transform a predecessor, but the predecessor contains tacit knowledge, trusted relationships, provenance, symbolic continuity, or identity-defining practices that will be lost if the transition is treated as simple replacement. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A transition plan emphasizes replacement, sunset, or modernization but has no explicit account of what institutional memory must survive.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A transition plan emphasizes replacement, sunset, or modernization but has no explicit account of what institutional memory must survive.", "A successor organization, system, role structure, or practice regime must replace or transform a predecessor, but the predecessor contains tacit knowledge, trusted relationships, provenance, symbolic continuity, or identity-defining practices that will be lost if the transition is treated as simple replacement."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Legacy Integration", "one_liner": "Maintains knowledge and identity across organizational discontinuities.", "page_ref": "prime:legacy_integration", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Sunset plan -> transition; missing memory account -> selective-integration failure.", "slug": "legacy_integration", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A replacement plan without an explicit account of what must survive instantiates the central integration gap."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A transition plan emphasizes replacement, sunset, or modernization but has no explicit account of what institutional memory must survive.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 60, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-060", "ledger_sha256": "98d6c528526e116e07206bdc41a067e87d90fc5c6b52caa2b9c49ef0688b85fd"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Selective Pathway Suppression", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:selective_pathway_suppression", "slug": "selective_pathway_suppression"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 1, "statement": "0 of 1 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 1}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A transformation is already active and is producing an undesirable, premature, excessive, or unsafe result. Full shutdown, removal, or blanket restriction would sacrifice important adjacent functions, yet passive warnings or generic friction do not act on the mechanism that carries the transformation. The system needs a selective brake that can reduce target activity while preserving legitimate operation and remaining reversible and observable.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A transformation is already active and is producing an undesirable, premature, excessive, or unsafe result. Full shutdown, removal, or blanket restriction would sacrifice important adjacent functions, yet passive warnings or generic friction do not act on the mechanism that carries the transformation. The system needs a selective brake that can reduce target activity while preserving legitimate operation and remaining reversible and observable."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P097-C01", "dnf": [], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [], "predicate": "Some target activity should be reduced while protected non-target functions should continue.", "resolution": "SOURCE_DEFECT", "semantic_scope": "SOURCE_DEFECT", "structural_head": "selective control should reduce target activity while preserving non-target functions", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P097-C01-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Goal shielding suppresses competing goals but does not universally entail preservation of non-target system functions.", "slug": "goal_shielding"}], "residual_id": "r:selective_pathway_suppression:b060_a08_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b060_a08_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The system needs a selective brake that can reduce target activity while preserving legitimate operation and remaining reversible and observable. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Some target activity should be reduced while protected non-target functions should continue.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Some target activity should be reduced while protected non-target functions should continue.", "The system needs a selective brake that can reduce target activity while preserving legitimate operation and remaining reversible and observable."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "SOURCE_REVIEW_REQUIRED", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 1, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Goal shielding suppresses competing goals but does not universally entail preservation of non-target system functions.", "slug": "goal_shielding"}], "normalized_requirement": "Some target activity should be reduced while protected non-target functions should continue.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "SOURCE_REVIEW_REQUIRED", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later candidate-blind atomization found that the source wording lacks a relation required by its diagnostic reading, so this is a source-repair issue rather than evidence of a missing abstraction."}, "predicate": "Some target activity should be reduced while protected non-target functions should continue.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The target transformation and its enabling mechanism can be specified with enough causal confidence to intervene.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Full shutdown, removal, or blanket restriction would sacrifice important adjacent functions, yet passive warnings or generic friction do not act on the mechanism that carries the transformation. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: The target transformation and its enabling mechanism can be specified with enough causal confidence to intervene. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The target transformation and its enabling mechanism can be specified with enough causal confidence to intervene.", "Full shutdown, removal, or blanket restriction would sacrifice important adjacent functions, yet passive warnings or generic friction do not act on the mechanism that carries the transformation."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "The target transformation and its enabling mechanism can be specified with enough causal confidence to intervene."}, {"display_text": "A counteracting agent, rule, signal, permission change, or state transition can reach a meaningful control point.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: A counteracting agent, rule, signal, permission change, or state transition can reach a meaningful control point. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A counteracting agent, rule, signal, permission change, or state transition can reach a meaningful control point."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "A counteracting agent, rule, signal, permission change, or state transition can reach a meaningful control point."}, {"display_text": "Target and protected-function effects can be monitored over the intervention's onset, duration, and release.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The intervention must be strong enough to reduce a consequential active pathway yet selective enough to preserve adjacent function; persistent enough to work yet reversible enough to release; adaptive enough to counter escape yet restrained enough not to select for resistance or normalize indefinite suppression. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: Target and protected-function effects can be monitored over the intervention's onset, duration, and release. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Target and protected-function effects can be monitored over the intervention's onset, duration, and release.", "The intervention must be strong enough to reduce a consequential active pathway yet selective enough to preserve adjacent function; persistent enough to work yet reversible enough to release; adaptive enough to counter escape yet restrained enough not to select for resistance or normalize indefinite suppression."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Target and protected-function effects can be monitored over the intervention's onset, duration, and release."}, {"display_text": "The intervention can be bounded by scope, intensity, time, authority, and stop conditions.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this deployment constraint: The intervention can be bounded by scope, intensity, time, authority, and stop conditions. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The intervention can be bounded by scope, intensity, time, authority, and stop conditions."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The intervention can be bounded by scope, intensity, time, authority, and stop conditions."}, {"display_text": "Rate limiting, boundary filtering, separation, containment, or total shutdown would be materially less precise or less reversible.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: Rate limiting, boundary filtering, separation, containment, or total shutdown would be materially less precise or less reversible. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Rate limiting, boundary filtering, separation, containment, or total shutdown would be materially less precise or less reversible."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Rate limiting, boundary filtering, separation, containment, or total shutdown would be materially less precise or less reversible."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 60, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-060", "ledger_sha256": "98d6c528526e116e07206bdc41a067e87d90fc5c6b52caa2b9c49ef0688b85fd"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Selectivity-Window Calibration", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:selectivity_window_calibration", "slug": "selectivity_window_calibration"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system relies on a selector, filter, reaction, rule, classifier, dose, or intervention whose ability to distinguish the intended target from non-targets depends on an operating parameter. The parameter is often treated as a one-way intensity knob, but discrimination only holds inside a bounded range. Outside that range the process may miss the target, capture the wrong things, produce side effects, amplify bycatch, or reverse its preference while still appearing successful under a narrow target metric.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system relies on a selector, filter, reaction, rule, classifier, dose, or intervention whose ability to distinguish the intended target from non-targets depends on an operating parameter. The parameter is often treated as a one-way intensity knob, but discrimination only holds inside a bounded range. Outside that range the process may miss the target, capture the wrong things, produce side effects, amplify bycatch, or reverse its preference while still appearing successful under a narrow target metric."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime requires a desired target and unwanted near-targets responding to the same process.", "role_mapping": "Desired target -> intended channel; bycatch -> non-target channel.", "slug": "selectivity_window", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b060_a09_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Outside that range the process may miss the target, capture the wrong things, produce side effects, amplify bycatch, or reverse its preference while still appearing successful under a narrow target metric. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The same process can act on desired targets and unwanted near-targets, side channels, vulnerable non-targets, or background variation.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The same process can act on desired targets and unwanted near-targets, side channels, vulnerable non-targets, or background variation.", "Outside that range the process may miss the target, capture the wrong things, produce side effects, amplify bycatch, or reverse its preference while still appearing successful under a narrow target metric."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Selectivity Window", "one_liner": "A process discriminates among targets only inside a bounded operating range of a control parameter, and loses or reverses that discrimination outside it.", "page_ref": "prime:selectivity_window", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Desired target -> intended channel; bycatch -> non-target channel.", "slug": "selectivity_window", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime requires a desired target and unwanted near-targets responding to the same process."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The same process can act on desired targets and unwanted near-targets, side channels, vulnerable non-targets, or background variation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A selectable control parameter such as dose, threshold, temperature, or intensity defines the window axis.", "role_mapping": "Tunable parameter -> control axis; sweep -> calibration.", "slug": "selectivity_window", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b060_a09_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The parameter is often treated as a one-way intensity knob, but discrimination only holds inside a bounded range. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: There is a control parameter that can be tuned, chosen, swept, or monitored: temperature, dose, pressure, pH, strictness, confidence threshold, review depth, enforcement intensity, time-in-state, exposure, or resource concentration.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["There is a control parameter that can be tuned, chosen, swept, or monitored: temperature, dose, pressure, pH, strictness, confidence threshold, review depth, enforcement intensity, time-in-state, exposure, or resource concentration.", "The parameter is often treated as a one-way intensity knob, but discrimination only holds inside a bounded range."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Selectivity Window", "one_liner": "A process discriminates among targets only inside a bounded operating range of a control parameter, and loses or reverses that discrimination outside it.", "page_ref": "prime:selectivity_window", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Tunable parameter -> control axis; sweep -> calibration.", "slug": "selectivity_window", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A selectable control parameter such as dose, threshold, temperature, or intensity defines the window axis."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "There is a control parameter that can be tuned, chosen, swept, or monitored: temperature, dose, pressure, pH, strictness, confidence threshold, review depth, enforcement intensity, time-in-state, exposure, or resource concentration.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The target and non-target response curves must differ nonlinearly so a discriminating band exists.", "role_mapping": "Nonlinear responses -> curves; regime dependence -> window boundaries.", "slug": "selectivity_window", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b060_a09_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Selective action requires enough intensity to separate signal from background, but excessive or mislocated intensity destroys the distinction by sweeping in non-targets, saturating the substrate, creating side effects, or changing the mechanism being exploited. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The target response and non-target burden are nonlinear, non-monotonic, saturating, or regime-dependent.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The target response and non-target burden are nonlinear, non-monotonic, saturating, or regime-dependent.", "Selective action requires enough intensity to separate signal from background, but excessive or mislocated intensity destroys the distinction by sweeping in non-targets, saturating the substrate, creating side effects, or changing the mechanism being exploited."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Selectivity Window", "one_liner": "A process discriminates among targets only inside a bounded operating range of a control parameter, and loses or reverses that discrimination outside it.", "page_ref": "prime:selectivity_window", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Nonlinear responses -> curves; regime dependence -> window boundaries.", "slug": "selectivity_window", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The target and non-target response curves must differ nonlinearly so a discriminating band exists."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The target response and non-target burden are nonlinear, non-monotonic, saturating, or regime-dependent.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A selectivity window can be characterized prospectively before failures occur.", "slug": "selectivity_window"}], "residual_id": "r:selectivity_window_calibration:b060_a09_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b060_a09_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Outside that range the process may miss the target, capture the wrong things, produce side effects, amplify bycatch, or reverse its preference while still appearing successful under a narrow target metric. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: There is evidence of false positives, false negatives, side products, bycatch, over-enforcement, cross-reactivity, or subgroup-specific collapse.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["There is evidence of false positives, false negatives, side products, bycatch, over-enforcement, cross-reactivity, or subgroup-specific collapse.", "Outside that range the process may miss the target, capture the wrong things, produce side effects, amplify bycatch, or reverse its preference while still appearing successful under a narrow target metric."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A selectivity window can be characterized prospectively before failures occur.", "slug": "selectivity_window"}], "normalized_requirement": "There is evidence of false positives, false negatives, side products, bycatch, over-enforcement, cross-reactivity, or subgroup-specific collapse.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "There is evidence of false positives, false negatives, side products, bycatch, over-enforcement, cross-reactivity, or subgroup-specific collapse.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The general prime can apply without any competing child-window label.", "slug": "selectivity_window"}], "residual_id": "r:selectivity_window_calibration:b060_a09_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b060_a09_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A child or neighboring window such as a therapeutic window, readiness window, or discourse window is too narrow to describe the whole control-parameter selectivity problem. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A child or neighboring window such as a therapeutic window, readiness window, or discourse window is too narrow to describe the whole control-parameter selectivity problem."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The general prime can apply without any competing child-window label.", "slug": "selectivity_window"}], "normalized_requirement": "A child or neighboring window such as a therapeutic window, readiness window, or discourse window is too narrow to describe the whole control-parameter selectivity problem.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A child or neighboring window such as a therapeutic window, readiness window, or discourse window is too narrow to describe the whole control-parameter selectivity problem.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Operators are tempted to increase intensity because a target-only metric improves, while collateral capture or reversal is less visible.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Outside that range the process may miss the target, capture the wrong things, produce side effects, amplify bycatch, or reverse its preference while still appearing successful under a narrow target metric. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Operators are tempted to increase intensity because a target-only metric improves, while collateral capture or reversal is less visible. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Operators are tempted to increase intensity because a target-only metric improves, while collateral capture or reversal is less visible.", "Outside that range the process may miss the target, capture the wrong things, produce side effects, amplify bycatch, or reverse its preference while still appearing successful under a narrow target metric."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Operators are tempted to increase intensity because a target-only metric improves, while collateral capture or reversal is less visible."}, {"display_text": "Window drift is likely because target definitions, substrates, instruments, populations, adversaries, or environmental conditions change.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Selective action requires enough intensity to separate signal from background, but excessive or mislocated intensity destroys the distinction by sweeping in non-targets, saturating the substrate, creating side effects, or changing the mechanism being exploited. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Window drift is likely because target definitions, substrates, instruments, populations, adversaries, or environmental conditions change. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Window drift is likely because target definitions, substrates, instruments, populations, adversaries, or environmental conditions change.", "Selective action requires enough intensity to separate signal from background, but excessive or mislocated intensity destroys the distinction by sweeping in non-targets, saturating the substrate, creating side effects, or changing the mechanism being exploited."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "Window drift is likely because target definitions, substrates, instruments, populations, adversaries, or environmental conditions change."}, {"display_text": "The system needs a hold, abstain, fallback, or human-review mode when selectivity cannot be guaranteed.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this deployment constraint: The system needs a hold, abstain, fallback, or human-review mode when selectivity cannot be guaranteed. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The system needs a hold, abstain, fallback, or human-review mode when selectivity cannot be guaranteed."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 8, "text": "The system needs a hold, abstain, fallback, or human-review mode when selectivity cannot be guaranteed."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 60, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-060", "ledger_sha256": "98d6c528526e116e07206bdc41a067e87d90fc5c6b52caa2b9c49ef0688b85fd"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Self-Binding Credibility Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:self_binding_credibility_design", "slug": "self_binding_credibility_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "An actor needs others to rely on a future action, restraint, guarantee, policy, or consequence, but the actor will later have incentives or opportunities to renege, renegotiate, shirk, reverse, or claim changed circumstances.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "An actor needs others to rely on a future action, restraint, guarantee, policy, or consequence, but the actor will later have incentives or opportunities to renege, renegotiate, shirk, reverse, or claim changed circumstances."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime is needed where speech alone cannot make a promise or threat believable.", "role_mapping": "Declared intention -> cheap talk; credibility gap -> missing binding signal.", "slug": "credible_commitment", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b060_a10_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "An actor needs others to rely on a future action, restraint, guarantee, policy, or consequence, but the actor will later have incentives or opportunities to renege, renegotiate, shirk, reverse, or claim changed circumstances. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A promise, threat, guarantee, offer, policy, or declared intention is not credible as mere speech.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A promise, threat, guarantee, offer, policy, or declared intention is not credible as mere speech.", "An actor needs others to rely on a future action, restraint, guarantee, policy, or consequence, but the actor will later have incentives or opportunities to renege, renegotiate, shirk, reverse, or claim changed circumstances."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Credible Commitment", "one_liner": "Deliberately constrain your own future choices so a promise or threat stays incentive-compatible at the moment of execution.", "page_ref": "prime:credible_commitment", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Declared intention -> cheap talk; credibility gap -> missing binding signal.", "slug": "credible_commitment", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime is needed where speech alone cannot make a promise or threat believable."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A promise, threat, guarantee, offer, policy, or declared intention is not credible as mere speech.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A future incentive to defect after others rely is the time-inconsistency that credible commitment solves.", "role_mapping": "Future temptation -> defection incentive; reliance -> counterparty exposure.", "slug": "credible_commitment", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}, {"argument": "The exact device constrains a future actor against a later preference to reverse course.", "role_mapping": "Future reversal -> temptation; binding mechanism -> device.", "slug": "commitment_device", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b060_a10_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "An actor needs others to rely on a future action, restraint, guarantee, policy, or consequence, but the actor will later have incentives or opportunities to renege, renegotiate, shirk, reverse, or claim changed circumstances. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The future actor will face a temptation or incentive to reverse course after counterparties have relied on the commitment.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The future actor will face a temptation or incentive to reverse course after counterparties have relied on the commitment.", "An actor needs others to rely on a future action, restraint, guarantee, policy, or consequence, but the actor will later have incentives or opportunities to renege, renegotiate, shirk, reverse, or claim changed circumstances."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Credible Commitment", "one_liner": "Deliberately constrain your own future choices so a promise or threat stays incentive-compatible at the moment of execution.", "page_ref": "prime:credible_commitment", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Future temptation -> defection incentive; reliance -> counterparty exposure.", "slug": "credible_commitment", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A future incentive to defect after others rely is the time-inconsistency that credible commitment solves."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Commitment Device", "one_liner": "A self-imposed constraint that binds one's own future choices.", "page_ref": "prime:commitment_device", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Future reversal -> temptation; binding mechanism -> device.", "slug": "commitment_device", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact device constrains a future actor against a later preference to reverse course."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The future actor will face a temptation or incentive to reverse course after counterparties have relied on the commitment.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Counterparty investment, waiting, entry, or restraint based on the promise is a defining reliance role.", "role_mapping": "Counterparties -> receivers; costly action -> reliance.", "slug": "credible_commitment", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b060_a10_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Counterparties must invest, coordinate, comply, wait, enter, trust, or refrain based on the commitment. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Counterparties must invest, coordinate, comply, wait, enter, trust, or refrain based on the commitment."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Credible Commitment", "one_liner": "Deliberately constrain your own future choices so a promise or threat stays incentive-compatible at the moment of execution.", "page_ref": "prime:credible_commitment", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Counterparties -> receivers; costly action -> reliance.", "slug": "credible_commitment", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Counterparty investment, waiting, entry, or restraint based on the promise is a defining reliance role."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Counterparties must invest, coordinate, comply, wait, enter, trust, or refrain based on the commitment.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The commitment can be attached to observable conditions, enforcement paths, stakes, or reputational consequences.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: The commitment can be attached to observable conditions, enforcement paths, stakes, or reputational consequences. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The commitment can be attached to observable conditions, enforcement paths, stakes, or reputational consequences."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The commitment can be attached to observable conditions, enforcement paths, stakes, or reputational consequences."}, {"display_text": "The binding device can be made visible enough for receivers to update expectations.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: The binding device can be made visible enough for receivers to update expectations. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The binding device can be made visible enough for receivers to update expectations."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The binding device can be made visible enough for receivers to update expectations."}, {"display_text": "A legitimate exception or revision boundary is needed because circumstances may change.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this deployment constraint: A legitimate exception or revision boundary is needed because circumstances may change. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A legitimate exception or revision boundary is needed because circumstances may change."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "A legitimate exception or revision boundary is needed because circumstances may change."}, {"display_text": "Failure to solve the credibility problem creates underinvestment, distrust, bargaining failure, deterrence failure, coordination failure, or moral hazard.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Credibility requires reducing future freedom, but reducing future freedom can create rigidity, unfairness, escalation, or lock-in when conditions change. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Failure to solve the credibility problem creates underinvestment, distrust, bargaining failure, deterrence failure, coordination failure, or moral hazard. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Failure to solve the credibility problem creates underinvestment, distrust, bargaining failure, deterrence failure, coordination failure, or moral hazard.", "Credibility requires reducing future freedom, but reducing future freedom can create rigidity, unfairness, escalation, or lock-in when conditions change."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "Failure to solve the credibility problem creates underinvestment, distrust, bargaining failure, deterrence failure, coordination failure, or moral hazard."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 60, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-060", "ledger_sha256": "98d6c528526e116e07206bdc41a067e87d90fc5c6b52caa2b9c49ef0688b85fd"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Self-Checking Operation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:self_checking_operation", "slug": "self_checking_operation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "An operation can emit an invalid result that looks usable enough to continue. Once accepted, the error spreads through downstream records, decisions, transmissions, or physical processes. Later audit may find the error, but the cost of repair has multiplied.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "An operation can produce an invalid, inconsistent, corrupted, mistyped, incomplete, or unsafe result that looks usable enough to continue. If validity is checked only later, the error spreads through downstream systems, decisions, records, or physical processes. The system needs the operation itself to generate validity evidence at the point of production or commitment."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime attaches an acceptability check before an operation's output is allowed to propagate.", "role_mapping": "Output release -> propagation; internal test -> gate.", "slug": "self_checking", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b060_a11_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Outputs are copied, transmitted, committed, installed, shipped, or used before external review is likely. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Outputs are copied, transmitted, committed, installed, shipped, or used before external review is likely."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Self Checking", "one_liner": "A system detects errors in its own output by computing the answer through partially-independent paths and comparing.", "page_ref": "prime:self_checking", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Output release -> propagation; internal test -> gate.", "slug": "self_checking", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime attaches an acceptability check before an operation's output is allowed to propagate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Outputs are copied, transmitted, committed, installed, shipped, or used before external review is likely.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Self-checking is warranted where small local errors can become large downstream failures.", "role_mapping": "Small error -> local fault; copied output -> amplification.", "slug": "self_checking", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b060_a11_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Once accepted, the error spreads through downstream records, decisions, transmissions, or physical processes. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Small input, transfer, calculation, or sequencing errors can create large downstream failures.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Small input, transfer, calculation, or sequencing errors can create large downstream failures.", "Once accepted, the error spreads through downstream records, decisions, transmissions, or physical processes."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Self Checking", "one_liner": "A system detects errors in its own output by computing the answer through partially-independent paths and comparing.", "page_ref": "prime:self_checking", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Small error -> local fault; copied output -> amplification.", "slug": "self_checking", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Self-checking is warranted where small local errors can become large downstream failures."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Small input, transfer, calculation, or sequencing errors can create large downstream failures.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Known invariants, balances, or redundant relations supply the operation's internal proof obligation.", "role_mapping": "Invariant -> check predicate; operation -> producer.", "slug": "self_checking", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b060_a11_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: There are known invariants, relations, constraints, redundant encodings, or expected balances that can be checked automatically. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["There are known invariants, relations, constraints, redundant encodings, or expected balances that can be checked automatically."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Self Checking", "one_liner": "A system detects errors in its own output by computing the answer through partially-independent paths and comparing.", "page_ref": "prime:self_checking", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Invariant -> check predicate; operation -> producer.", "slug": "self_checking", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Known invariants, balances, or redundant relations supply the operation's internal proof obligation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "There are known invariants, relations, constraints, redundant encodings, or expected balances that can be checked automatically.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The design trades a bounded pre-release check cost against a more costly false pass.", "role_mapping": "Check cost -> gate overhead; false pass -> downstream risk.", "slug": "self_checking", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b060_a11_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The cost of a false pass is higher than the cost of checking before release. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The cost of a false pass is higher than the cost of checking before release."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Self Checking", "one_liner": "A system detects errors in its own output by computing the answer through partially-independent paths and comparing.", "page_ref": "prime:self_checking", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Check cost -> gate overhead; false pass -> downstream risk.", "slug": "self_checking", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The design trades a bounded pre-release check cost against a more costly false pass."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The cost of a false pass is higher than the cost of checking before release.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Human operators are rushed, fatigued, distracted, or working across repetitive steps where slips are predictable.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Human operators are rushed, fatigued, distracted, or working across repetitive steps where slips are predictable. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Human operators are rushed, fatigued, distracted, or working across repetitive steps where slips are predictable."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Human operators are rushed, fatigued, distracted, or working across repetitive steps where slips are predictable."}, {"display_text": "A downstream process assumes that upstream outputs are valid and has weak recovery capacity.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: A downstream process assumes that upstream outputs are valid and has weak recovery capacity. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A downstream process assumes that upstream outputs are valid and has weak recovery capacity."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "A downstream process assumes that upstream outputs are valid and has weak recovery capacity."}, {"display_text": "The operation can branch into accept, reject, retry, correct, or quarantine states without destroying usability.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: The operation can branch into accept, reject, retry, correct, or quarantine states without destroying usability. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The operation can branch into accept, reject, retry, correct, or quarantine states without destroying usability."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "The operation can branch into accept, reject, retry, correct, or quarantine states without destroying usability."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 60, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-060", "ledger_sha256": "98d6c528526e116e07206bdc41a067e87d90fc5c6b52caa2b9c49ef0688b85fd"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Self-Efficacy Scaffolding", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:self_efficacy_scaffolding", "slug": "self_efficacy_scaffolding"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 5, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is under-action caused by low capability belief. The actor may have some resources, support, or opportunity, but they do not initiate or persist because prior evidence, poor feedback, comparison, unfamiliarity, or task scale makes success feel unlikely.\n\nThis often appears as waiting for more confidence before acting, over-reliance on experts, withdrawal after small mistakes, or repeated requests for reassurance. It can also appear in teams that need proof that coordinated action will matter before they will take larger collective steps.\n\nThe pattern should not be used to blame people for structural barriers. If people lack authority, safety, access, time, tools, or resources, those conditions must be addressed directly. Self-efficacy scaffolding works only when there is a real action path that can produce honest capability evidence.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A person, team, learner, worker, or community has enough latent capacity, support, or opportunity to begin acting, but does not initiate, persist, or accept responsibility because capability belief is low, vague, or repeatedly contradicted by past experience."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Scaffolding can support an already-engaged learner rather than avoidance.", "slug": "scaffolding"}], "residual_id": "r:self_efficacy_scaffolding:b060_a12_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b060_a12_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Self-efficacy scaffolding works only when there is a real action path that can produce honest capability evidence. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The actor avoids starting despite having access to at least some real path of action.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The actor avoids starting despite having access to at least some real path of action.", "Self-efficacy scaffolding works only when there is a real action path that can produce honest capability evidence."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Scaffolding can support an already-engaged learner rather than avoidance.", "slug": "scaffolding"}], "normalized_requirement": "The actor avoids starting despite having access to at least some real path of action.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The actor avoids starting despite having access to at least some real path of action.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P097-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve an actor, a target capability, and the actor's belief about attainability.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An actor evaluates whether they can attain or exercise a target capability.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail low perceived attainability rather than a capability regarded as difficult but attainable.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The actor perceives the target capability as out of reach.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a past failure experience as the causal precursor.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Prior failure causes the capability to feel out of reach.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires deficient or discouraging feedback as the causal precursor.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Poor feedback causes the capability to feel out of reach.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires comparison with another actor, standard, or performance as the causal precursor.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Comparison causes the capability to feel out of reach.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires lack of familiarity or prior exposure as the causal precursor.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "Unfamiliarity causes the capability to feel out of reach.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Prior failure, poor feedback, comparison, or unfamiliarity causes an actor to perceive a target capability as out of reach.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "adverse prior experience makes a capability feel unreachable", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P097-C02-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Scaffolding can be preventive with no prior failure.", "slug": "scaffolding"}], "residual_id": "r:self_efficacy_scaffolding:b060_a12_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b060_a12_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The actor may have some resources, support, or opportunity, but they do not initiate or persist because prior evidence, poor feedback, comparison, unfamiliarity, or task scale makes success feel unlikely. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Prior failure, poor feedback, comparison, or unfamiliarity has made the target capability feel out of reach.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Prior failure, poor feedback, comparison, or unfamiliarity has made the target capability feel out of reach.", "The actor may have some resources, support, or opportunity, but they do not initiate or persist because prior evidence, poor feedback, comparison, unfamiliarity, or task scale makes success feel unlikely."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Scaffolding can be preventive with no prior failure.", "slug": "scaffolding"}], "normalized_requirement": "Prior failure, poor feedback, comparison, or unfamiliarity has made the target capability feel out of reach.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Prior failure, poor feedback, comparison, or unfamiliarity has made the target capability feel out of reach.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A task in the ZPD can have a clearly visible first step.", "slug": "zone_of_proximal_development_zpd"}], "residual_id": "r:self_efficacy_scaffolding:b060_a12_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b060_a12_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A strong use case usually includes a specific target capability, a first action that can be attempted safely enough, a way to observe progress, and a path for increasing difficulty or responsibility. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The capability is too abstract or large for people to see an attainable first step.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The capability is too abstract or large for people to see an attainable first step.", "A strong use case usually includes a specific target capability, a first action that can be attempted safely enough, a way to observe progress, and a path for increasing difficulty or responsibility."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A task in the ZPD can have a clearly visible first step.", "slug": "zone_of_proximal_development_zpd"}], "normalized_requirement": "The capability is too abstract or large for people to see an attainable first step.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The capability is too abstract or large for people to see an attainable first step.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P097-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"], ["O1", "O3"], ["O1", "O4"], ["O1", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve an observing actor, a target capability, and a model or exemplar role.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An actor could use another actor, example, or representation as a model of the target capability.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires model unavailability rather than a present but unsuitable model.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Relevant models of the capability are absent.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires an expertise-distance mismatch between model and actor.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Available models are too expert to make the capability appear attainable to the actor.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires presentation that hides struggle, intermediate steps, or realistic progression.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Available models are too polished to expose an attainable path to capability.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires the actor to reject the model's relevance, authenticity, or evidentiary force.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Available models are not credible to the actor.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "An actor lacks a usable capability model because relevant models are absent, too expert, too polished, or not credible.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "actor lacks an available credible and attainable capability model", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P097-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Scaffolding need not use social models.", "slug": "scaffolding"}], "residual_id": "r:self_efficacy_scaffolding:b060_a12_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b060_a12_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Available models are absent, too expert, too polished, or not credible to the actor. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Available models are absent, too expert, too polished, or not credible to the actor."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Scaffolding need not use social models.", "slug": "scaffolding"}], "normalized_requirement": "Available models are absent, too expert, too polished, or not credible to the actor.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Available models are absent, too expert, too polished, or not credible to the actor.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Well-calibrated scaffolding can already fade appropriately.", "slug": "scaffolding"}], "residual_id": "r:self_efficacy_scaffolding:b060_a12_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b060_a12_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The actor may have some resources, support, or opportunity, but they do not initiate or persist because prior evidence, poor feedback, comparison, unfamiliarity, or task scale makes success feel unlikely. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Support is either missing or so heavy that success cannot be interpreted as the actor’s own growing capability.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Support is either missing or so heavy that success cannot be interpreted as the actor’s own growing capability.", "The actor may have some resources, support, or opportunity, but they do not initiate or persist because prior evidence, poor feedback, comparison, unfamiliarity, or task scale makes success feel unlikely."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Well-calibrated scaffolding can already fade appropriately.", "slug": "scaffolding"}], "normalized_requirement": "Support is either missing or so heavy that success cannot be interpreted as the actor’s own growing capability.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Support is either missing or so heavy that success cannot be interpreted as the actor’s own growing capability.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 60, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-060", "ledger_sha256": "98d6c528526e116e07206bdc41a067e87d90fc5c6b52caa2b9c49ef0688b85fd"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Self-Endorsed Norm Uptake", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:self_endorsed_norm_uptake", "slug": "self_endorsed_norm_uptake"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 3 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A rule, value, professional standard, safety practice, civic expectation, or community norm matters, but compliance depends too heavily on external monitoring, reward, punishment, status pressure, or rote instruction. When oversight disappears, behavior decays; when pressure increases, actors may comply performatively, resist, hide, or feel coerced. The system needs the norm to become internally usable without turning education into manipulation or identity control.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A rule, value, professional standard, safety practice, civic expectation, or community norm matters, but compliance depends too heavily on external monitoring, reward, punishment, status pressure, or rote instruction. When oversight disappears, behavior decays; when pressure increases, actors may comply performatively, resist, hide, or feel coerced. The system needs the norm to become internally usable without turning education into manipulation or identity control."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Social norms can depend on anticipated observation and sanction.", "slug": "social_norms"}], "residual_id": "r:self_endorsed_norm_uptake:b060_a13_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b060_a13_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The desired behavior must persist when no supervisor, auditor, teacher, algorithm, or peer group is actively watching. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The desired behavior must persist when no supervisor, auditor, teacher, algorithm, or peer group is actively watching."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Social norms can depend on anticipated observation and sanction.", "slug": "social_norms"}], "normalized_requirement": "The desired behavior must persist when no supervisor, auditor, teacher, algorithm, or peer group is actively watching.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The desired behavior must persist when no supervisor, auditor, teacher, algorithm, or peer group is actively watching.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A normative rule can be mechanically determinate.", "slug": "normativity"}], "residual_id": "r:self_endorsed_norm_uptake:b060_a13_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b060_a13_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A rule, value, professional standard, safety practice, civic expectation, or community norm matters, but compliance depends too heavily on external monitoring, reward, punishment, status pressure, or rote instruction. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The norm requires judgment in new cases rather than mechanical rule following.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The norm requires judgment in new cases rather than mechanical rule following.", "A rule, value, professional standard, safety practice, civic expectation, or community norm matters, but compliance depends too heavily on external monitoring, reward, punishment, status pressure, or rote instruction."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A normative rule can be mechanically determinate.", "slug": "normativity"}], "normalized_requirement": "The norm requires judgment in new cases rather than mechanical rule following.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The norm requires judgment in new cases rather than mechanical rule following.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P097-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O4", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O4", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O4", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a compliance target, regulated actors, and an external control mechanism.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A rule or norm has a compliance requirement and an external mechanism intended to secure compliance.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the mechanism's primary compliance role rather than a minor supplementary use.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The external mechanism is used or proposed as the main compliance mechanism.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This mechanism branch requires threatened or imposed external penalty.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The external mechanism is a sanction.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This mechanism branch requires an external reward or inducement.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The external mechanism is an incentive.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This defect branch requires inadequate compliance effect.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The mechanism is insufficient to secure the required compliance.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This defect branch requires prohibitive monitoring, enforcement, reward, or administration cost.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The mechanism is too expensive to serve as the main compliance mechanism.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This defect branch requires compliance to fail under foreseeable withdrawal, gaming, or contextual change.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The mechanism is too brittle to serve as the main compliance mechanism.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This defect branch requires coercive, manipulative, unfair, or otherwise impermissible external control.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The mechanism is ethically inappropriate as the main compliance mechanism.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "An external sanction or incentive is unsuitable as the main compliance mechanism because it is insufficient, too expensive, too brittle, or ethically inappropriate.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "external compliance mechanism is unsuitable as the main mechanism", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P097-C04-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Many social norms are sustained precisely by external informal sanction.", "slug": "social_norms"}], "residual_id": "r:self_endorsed_norm_uptake:b060_a13_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b060_a13_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A rule, value, professional standard, safety practice, civic expectation, or community norm matters, but compliance depends too heavily on external monitoring, reward, punishment, status pressure, or rote instruction. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: External sanctions or incentives are insufficient, too expensive, too brittle, or ethically inappropriate as the main compliance mechanism.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["External sanctions or incentives are insufficient, too expensive, too brittle, or ethically inappropriate as the main compliance mechanism.", "A rule, value, professional standard, safety practice, civic expectation, or community norm matters, but compliance depends too heavily on external monitoring, reward, punishment, status pressure, or rote instruction."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_SYNTHESIS", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Under perfect observation and error-free action, grim trigger remains a valid deterrent without being too brittle; the single signal-reliability guard is therefore necessary and sufficient for O7.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Grim Trigger", "one_liner": "A repeated-game strategy that cooperates every period until the opponent defects once, then switches to permanent defection forever — the severity-maximal, zero-forgiveness deterrent that sustains cooperation whenever the discount factor is high enough.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:grim_trigger", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O7"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "trigger_signal_is_error_prone", "predicate": "The interaction's trigger signal is error-prone.", "rationale": "The candidate supplies the structural spine and the single emitted qualifier is anchored, atomic, minimal, and does not add a second relation family."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "grim_trigger"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "trigger_signal_is_error_prone"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "grim_trigger", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P097-C04-U1", "why_it_fits": "Direct overstates the unsuitability branch because grim trigger can sustain cooperation under perfect monitoring. One atomic error-prone-signal guard activates the exact record's catastrophic brittleness and completes O7."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "External sanctions or incentives are insufficient, too expensive, too brittle, or ethically inappropriate as the main compliance mechanism.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "People can learn the reasons, consequences, and limits of the norm rather than only memorize commands.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: People can learn the reasons, consequences, and limits of the norm rather than only memorize commands. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["People can learn the reasons, consequences, and limits of the norm rather than only memorize commands."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "People can learn the reasons, consequences, and limits of the norm rather than only memorize commands."}, {"display_text": "A community, profession, organization, institution, or role depends on members carrying standards across contexts.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A rule, value, professional standard, safety practice, civic expectation, or community norm matters, but compliance depends too heavily on external monitoring, reward, punishment, status pressure, or rote instruction. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: A community, profession, organization, institution, or role depends on members carrying standards across contexts. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A community, profession, organization, institution, or role depends on members carrying standards across contexts.", "A rule, value, professional standard, safety practice, civic expectation, or community norm matters, but compliance depends too heavily on external monitoring, reward, punishment, status pressure, or rote instruction."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "A community, profession, organization, institution, or role depends on members carrying standards across contexts."}, {"display_text": "The norm is legitimate enough to be explained and contested, not merely imposed by authority.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this deployment constraint: The norm is legitimate enough to be explained and contested, not merely imposed by authority. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The norm is legitimate enough to be explained and contested, not merely imposed by authority."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The norm is legitimate enough to be explained and contested, not merely imposed by authority."}, {"display_text": "There is time for onboarding, reflection, practice, feedback, and repair before high-stakes application.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: There is time for onboarding, reflection, practice, feedback, and repair before high-stakes application. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["There is time for onboarding, reflection, practice, feedback, and repair before high-stakes application."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "There is time for onboarding, reflection, practice, feedback, and repair before high-stakes application."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 60, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-060", "ledger_sha256": "98d6c528526e116e07206bdc41a067e87d90fc5c6b52caa2b9c49ef0688b85fd"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Self-Fulfilling Prophecy Interruption", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:self_fulfilling_prophecy_interruption", "slug": "self_fulfilling_prophecy_interruption"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 1, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 5 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a feedback loop: expectation shapes behavior; behavior changes opportunity, interpretation, or response; changed conditions produce an outcome; the outcome is read as confirmation of the expectation. Once the loop closes, the system may believe it has learned something objective even though it has partly observed the effect of its own treatment.\n\nThis is why the archetype belongs in the cognitive feedback correction family rather than as a generic bias reminder. The key problem is not only distorted belief. The expectation becomes operational through resource allocation, attention, warmth, scrutiny, information access, feedback quality, opportunity, or the visibility of labels and scores.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A belief or label changes behavior toward a person, group, or system in ways that increase the likelihood of the expected outcome. The result is a self-confirming loop: the expectation changes treatment or environment, the changed conditions influence the target response, and the outcome is read as independent proof that the expectation was right."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Expectation violation concerns an outcome departing from expectation and does not entail that the expectation was visible before treatment.", "slug": "expectation_violation"}], "residual_id": "r:self_fulfilling_prophecy_interruption:b060_a14_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b060_a14_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The expectation becomes operational through resource allocation, attention, warmth, scrutiny, information access, feedback quality, opportunity, or the visibility of labels and scores. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A label, prior score, reputation, forecast, stereotype, first impression, or low/high expectation is visible before treatment, evaluation, or resource allocation occurs.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A label, prior score, reputation, forecast, stereotype, first impression, or low/high expectation is visible before treatment, evaluation, or resource allocation occurs.", "The expectation becomes operational through resource allocation, attention, warmth, scrutiny, information access, feedback quality, opportunity, or the visibility of labels and scores."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Expectation violation concerns an outcome departing from expectation and does not entail that the expectation was visible before treatment.", "slug": "expectation_violation"}], "normalized_requirement": "A label, prior score, reputation, forecast, stereotype, first impression, or low/high expectation is visible before treatment, evaluation, or resource allocation occurs.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A label, prior score, reputation, forecast, stereotype, first impression, or low/high expectation is visible before treatment, evaluation, or resource allocation occurs.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P097-C05", "dnf": [], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [], "predicate": "An expectation holder has enough influence to alter one or more treatment or interpretation channels affecting a target.", "resolution": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RESIDUAL", "semantic_scope": "NON_ABSTRACTION", "structural_head": "expectation holder has sufficient influence to alter target conditions", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P097-C05-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An incentive can change behavior without an expectation holder controlling another party's opportunity.", "slug": "incentive"}], "residual_id": "r:self_fulfilling_prophecy_interruption:b060_a14_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b060_a14_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The expectation becomes operational through resource allocation, attention, warmth, scrutiny, information access, feedback quality, opportunity, or the visibility of labels and scores. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The expectation holder has enough influence to alter opportunity, warmth, scrutiny, feedback, risk tolerance, interpretation, or follow-up.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The expectation holder has enough influence to alter opportunity, warmth, scrutiny, feedback, risk tolerance, interpretation, or follow-up.", "The expectation becomes operational through resource allocation, attention, warmth, scrutiny, information access, feedback quality, opportunity, or the visibility of labels and scores."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RECLASSIFIED", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 1, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An incentive can change behavior without an expectation holder controlling another party's opportunity.", "slug": "incentive"}], "normalized_requirement": "The expectation holder has enough influence to alter opportunity, warmth, scrutiny, feedback, risk tolerance, interpretation, or follow-up.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RECLASSIFIED", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later candidate-blind atomization classified this remainder as a threshold, parameter, materiality test, or other non-abstraction rather than a catalog gap."}, "predicate": "The expectation holder has enough influence to alter opportunity, warmth, scrutiny, feedback, risk tolerance, interpretation, or follow-up.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Incentives can move behavior without producing the outcome of a prior prediction.", "slug": "incentive"}], "residual_id": "r:self_fulfilling_prophecy_interruption:b060_a14_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b060_a14_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A belief or label changes behavior toward a person, group, or system in ways that increase the likelihood of the expected outcome. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The predicted outcome is plausibly affected by those altered behaviors, rather than being independent of them.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The predicted outcome is plausibly affected by those altered behaviors, rather than being independent of them.", "A belief or label changes behavior toward a person, group, or system in ways that increase the likelihood of the expected outcome."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Incentives can move behavior without producing the outcome of a prior prediction.", "slug": "incentive"}], "normalized_requirement": "The predicted outcome is plausibly affected by those altered behaviors, rather than being independent of them.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The predicted outcome is plausibly affected by those altered behaviors, rather than being independent of them.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Confirmation bias can favor evidence without any expectation-driven causal production.", "slug": "confirmation_bias"}], "residual_id": "r:self_fulfilling_prophecy_interruption:b060_a14_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b060_a14_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A well-formed draft preserves base-rate evidence and safeguards while asking whether the system is helping create the outcome it later treats as independent proof. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The system treats later confirmation as evidence while ignoring how the system produced or amplified the outcome.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The system treats later confirmation as evidence while ignoring how the system produced or amplified the outcome.", "A well-formed draft preserves base-rate evidence and safeguards while asking whether the system is helping create the outcome it later treats as independent proof."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Confirmation bias can favor evidence without any expectation-driven causal production.", "slug": "confirmation_bias"}], "normalized_requirement": "The system treats later confirmation as evidence while ignoring how the system produced or amplified the outcome.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The system treats later confirmation as evidence while ignoring how the system produced or amplified the outcome.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P097-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve an expectation, affected target role, and potential counterevidence role.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An expectation concerns affected people who could otherwise generate evidence against it.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail impaired counterevidence production or expectation-shaped interpretation that neutralizes the counterevidentiary force of produced outcomes.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The affected people have limited ability to generate evidence or have their outcomes count as counterevidence.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must make the expectation-mediated constraint causal for the evidentiary limitation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The expectation limits counterevidence by constraining the selected target-facing channel.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires restricted chances to act, perform, or disconfirm the expectation.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The expectation constrains opportunities available to the affected people.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires reduced assistance, resources, encouragement, or enabling conditions.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The expectation constrains support available to the affected people.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires expectation-shaped interpretation that prevents disconfirming evidence from being legible.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The expectation constrains interpretation of the affected people's behavior or results.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "An expectation limits affected people's ability to generate or establish counterevidence by constraining their opportunities, support, or interpretation.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "expectation constrains target conditions and suppresses counterevidence", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P097-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Bystander suppression concerns plural responders, not a target denied opportunities by prior expectations.", "slug": "bystander_effect"}], "residual_id": "r:self_fulfilling_prophecy_interruption:b060_a14_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b060_a14_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The structural problem is a feedback loop: expectation shapes behavior; behavior changes opportunity, interpretation, or response; changed conditions produce an outcome; the outcome is read as confirmation of the expectation. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Affected people have limited ability to generate counterevidence because the expectation constrains opportunities, support, or interpretation.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Affected people have limited ability to generate counterevidence because the expectation constrains opportunities, support, or interpretation.", "The structural problem is a feedback loop: expectation shapes behavior; behavior changes opportunity, interpretation, or response; changed conditions produce an outcome; the outcome is read as confirmation of the expectation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_SYNTHESIS", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "If success were allowed to update the person's self-assessment, the non-updating impostor mechanism would be absent; every complete instance instead rereads success so it cannot count as counterevidence.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Impostor Syndrome", "one_liner": "The pattern in which a demonstrably capable, externally-validated person keeps a private conviction that their competence is fake, because a non-updating self-assessment channel rereads each new success as proof the deception still works rather than as evidence of ability.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:impostor_syndrome", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "impostor_syndrome"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "impostor_syndrome", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P097-C06-U1", "why_it_fits": "The audited shared negative is rescued: the exact impostor-syndrome mechanism makes the person's own success counterevidence, then causally neutralizes it by rereading success as proof that the deception still works."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "If rebuttal were received independently of the frame, the self-confirming mechanism would be absent.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Poisoning the Well", "one_liner": "Pre-emptively discrediting the source of a forthcoming argument, so an anchoring frame of suspicion is installed first and every later thing the source says is received through it — including any rebuttal, read as defensiveness.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:poisoning_the_well", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "poisoning_the_well"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "poisoning_the_well", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P097-C06-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every instance makes the target's later counterevidence illegible through an expectation-shaped frame."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Affected people have limited ability to generate counterevidence because the expectation constrains opportunities, support, or interpretation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 60, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-060", "ledger_sha256": "98d6c528526e116e07206bdc41a067e87d90fc5c6b52caa2b9c49ef0688b85fd"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Self-Generated Signal Cancellation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:self_generated_signal_cancellation", "slug": "self_generated_signal_cancellation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 5, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system both generates actions and reads the resulting signals, but its observation channel cannot tell whether a signal was caused by the world, by its own command, or by the interaction between the two; self-caused effects therefore masquerade as external surprises, noise, threat, feedback, or evidence.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system both generates actions and reads the resulting signals, but its observation channel cannot tell whether a signal was caused by the world, by its own command, or by the interaction between the two; self-caused effects therefore masquerade as external surprises, noise, threat, feedback, or evidence."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime requires the same system to issue a motor or control command and interpret affected sensory signals.", "role_mapping": "Actor -> command source; observer -> comparator.", "slug": "efference_copy", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b060_a15_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system both generates actions and reads the resulting signals, but its observation channel cannot tell whether a signal was caused by the world, by its own command, or by the interaction between the two; self-caused effects therefore masquerade as external surprises, noise, threat, feedback, or evidence. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The same system or actor both issues commands and interprets signals affected by those commands.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The same system or actor both issues commands and interprets signals affected by those commands.", "A system both generates actions and reads the resulting signals, but its observation channel cannot tell whether a signal was caused by the world, by its own command, or by the interaction between the two; self-caused effects therefore masquerade as external surprises, noise, threat, feedback, or evidence."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Efference Copy", "one_liner": "Routing an internal copy of a command to the perceiver so self-caused effects can be predicted and subtracted, leaving only the world-caused remainder.", "page_ref": "prime:efference_copy", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Actor -> command source; observer -> comparator.", "slug": "efference_copy", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime requires the same system to issue a motor or control command and interpret affected sensory signals."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The same system or actor both issues commands and interprets signals affected by those commands.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A command must predictably alter the later observation so its expected consequence can be modeled.", "role_mapping": "Action -> command; altered telemetry -> reafference.", "slug": "efference_copy", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b060_a15_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Actions predictably alter sensory input, telemetry, load, position, sound, vibration, logs, or downstream state. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Actions predictably alter sensory input, telemetry, load, position, sound, vibration, logs, or downstream state."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Efference Copy", "one_liner": "Routing an internal copy of a command to the perceiver so self-caused effects can be predicted and subtracted, leaving only the world-caused remainder.", "page_ref": "prime:efference_copy", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Action -> command; altered telemetry -> reafference.", "slug": "efference_copy", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A command must predictably alter the later observation so its expected consequence can be modeled."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Actions predictably alter sensory input, telemetry, load, position, sound, vibration, logs, or downstream state.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The purpose of efference copy is distinguishing externally caused residuals from large predictable self-caused components.", "role_mapping": "World changes -> residual; self effects -> predicted component.", "slug": "efference_copy", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b060_a15_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system both generates actions and reads the resulting signals, but its observation channel cannot tell whether a signal was caused by the world, by its own command, or by the interaction between the two; self-caused effects therefore masquerade as external surprises, noise, threat, feedback, or evidence. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The observer must detect world-caused changes, faults, threats, or opportunities despite large self-caused signal components.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The observer must detect world-caused changes, faults, threats, or opportunities despite large self-caused signal components.", "A system both generates actions and reads the resulting signals, but its observation channel cannot tell whether a signal was caused by the world, by its own command, or by the interaction between the two; self-caused effects therefore masquerade as external surprises, noise, threat, feedback, or evidence."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Efference Copy", "one_liner": "Routing an internal copy of a command to the perceiver so self-caused effects can be predicted and subtracted, leaving only the world-caused remainder.", "page_ref": "prime:efference_copy", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "World changes -> residual; self effects -> predicted component.", "slug": "efference_copy", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The purpose of efference copy is distinguishing externally caused residuals from large predictable self-caused components."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The observer must detect world-caused changes, faults, threats, or opportunities despite large self-caused signal components.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "An internal copy of the outgoing command is the defining efference signal.", "role_mapping": "Copied command -> efference copy; before observation -> feedforward path.", "slug": "efference_copy", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b060_a15_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system both generates actions and reads the resulting signals, but its observation channel cannot tell whether a signal was caused by the world, by its own command, or by the interaction between the two; self-caused effects therefore masquerade as external surprises, noise, threat, feedback, or evidence. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A command can be copied or represented internally before or during the resulting observation.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A command can be copied or represented internally before or during the resulting observation.", "A system both generates actions and reads the resulting signals, but its observation channel cannot tell whether a signal was caused by the world, by its own command, or by the interaction between the two; self-caused effects therefore masquerade as external surprises, noise, threat, feedback, or evidence."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Efference Copy", "one_liner": "Routing an internal copy of a command to the perceiver so self-caused effects can be predicted and subtracted, leaving only the world-caused remainder.", "page_ref": "prime:efference_copy", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Copied command -> efference copy; before observation -> feedforward path.", "slug": "efference_copy", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "An internal copy of the outgoing command is the defining efference signal."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A command can be copied or represented internally before or during the resulting observation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A forward model maps the command copy to expected sensory consequences for subtraction or tagging.", "role_mapping": "Forward model -> predictor; discount -> cancellation.", "slug": "efference_copy", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b060_a15_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A forward model can estimate the expected observation well enough to discount, mask, or annotate it. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A forward model can estimate the expected observation well enough to discount, mask, or annotate it."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Efference Copy", "one_liner": "Routing an internal copy of a command to the perceiver so self-caused effects can be predicted and subtracted, leaving only the world-caused remainder.", "page_ref": "prime:efference_copy", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Forward model -> predictor; discount -> cancellation.", "slug": "efference_copy", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A forward model maps the command copy to expected sensory consequences for subtraction or tagging."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A forward model can estimate the expected observation well enough to discount, mask, or annotate it.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The self-caused component is faster, larger, more frequent, or more salient than the external residual of interest.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system both generates actions and reads the resulting signals, but its observation channel cannot tell whether a signal was caused by the world, by its own command, or by the interaction between the two; self-caused effects therefore masquerade as external surprises, noise, threat, feedback, or evidence. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The self-caused component is faster, larger, more frequent, or more salient than the external residual of interest. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The self-caused component is faster, larger, more frequent, or more salient than the external residual of interest.", "A system both generates actions and reads the resulting signals, but its observation channel cannot tell whether a signal was caused by the world, by its own command, or by the interaction between the two; self-caused effects therefore masquerade as external surprises, noise, threat, feedback, or evidence."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The self-caused component is faster, larger, more frequent, or more salient than the external residual of interest."}, {"display_text": "Attribution errors create false alarms, missed anomalies, unstable correction, or confusion between agency and disturbance.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Attribution errors create false alarms, missed anomalies, unstable correction, or confusion between agency and disturbance. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Attribution errors create false alarms, missed anomalies, unstable correction, or confusion between agency and disturbance."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "Attribution errors create false alarms, missed anomalies, unstable correction, or confusion between agency and disturbance."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 60, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-060", "ledger_sha256": "98d6c528526e116e07206bdc41a067e87d90fc5c6b52caa2b9c49ef0688b85fd"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Self-Handicapping Disruption", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:self_handicapping_disruption", "slug": "self_handicapping_disruption"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a loop: evaluation threatens identity, identity threat makes effort feel unsafe, unsafe effort makes protective obstacles useful, and protective obstacles prevent the evidence needed for learning or performance improvement.\n\nA protective obstacle can look like delay, distraction, overcommitment, avoidant perfectionism, last-minute crisis, vague blocker claims, or refusal to show drafts. Some obstacles are real. The archetype therefore starts with a real-constraint check. Treating real resource, safety, access, fairness, or workload barriers as excuses is a serious failure mode.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A person or group creates, amplifies, foregrounds, or preserves an obstacle before evaluation so that poor performance can be attributed to the obstacle rather than to ability, effort, strategy, or commitment. The structure protects identity in the short term but damages learning, trust, accountability, and performance over time."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime preserves a favorable self-attribution by avoiding effort that would make actual ability diagnostic.", "role_mapping": "Avoided effort -> handicap; visible performance -> diagnostic evaluation.", "slug": "self_handicapping", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b061_a01_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A person or group creates, amplifies, foregrounds, or preserves an obstacle before evaluation so that poor performance can be attributed to the obstacle rather than to ability, effort, strategy, or commitment. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The actor wants to preserve the possibility of success but avoids conditions where effort would make actual performance evidence visible.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The actor wants to preserve the possibility of success but avoids conditions where effort would make actual performance evidence visible.", "A person or group creates, amplifies, foregrounds, or preserves an obstacle before evaluation so that poor performance can be attributed to the obstacle rather than to ability, effort, strategy, or commitment."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Self-Handicapping", "one_liner": "Pre-emptively creating obstacles before an evaluation so any failure can be blamed on the obstacle rather than on one's ability, protecting a fragile self-assessment from disconfirming evidence.", "page_ref": "prime:self_handicapping", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Avoided effort -> handicap; visible performance -> diagnostic evaluation.", "slug": "self_handicapping", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime preserves a favorable self-attribution by avoiding effort that would make actual ability diagnostic."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The actor wants to preserve the possibility of success but avoids conditions where effort would make actual performance evidence visible.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Procrastination, underpreparation, overcommitment, and last-minute crises are canonical self-created obstacles before evaluation.", "role_mapping": "Obstacle pattern -> handicap; evaluation moment -> attribution threat.", "slug": "self_handicapping", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b061_a01_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A protective obstacle can look like delay, distraction, overcommitment, avoidant perfectionism, last-minute crisis, vague blocker claims, or refusal to show drafts. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Delays, distractions, resource complaints, overcommitment, underpreparation, or last-minute crises repeatedly appear before evaluation moments.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Delays, distractions, resource complaints, overcommitment, underpreparation, or last-minute crises repeatedly appear before evaluation moments.", "A protective obstacle can look like delay, distraction, overcommitment, avoidant perfectionism, last-minute crisis, vague blocker claims, or refusal to show drafts."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Self-Handicapping", "one_liner": "Pre-emptively creating obstacles before an evaluation so any failure can be blamed on the obstacle rather than on one's ability, protecting a fragile self-assessment from disconfirming evidence.", "page_ref": "prime:self_handicapping", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Obstacle pattern -> handicap; evaluation moment -> attribution threat.", "slug": "self_handicapping", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Procrastination, underpreparation, overcommitment, and last-minute crises are canonical self-created obstacles before evaluation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Delays, distractions, resource complaints, overcommitment, underpreparation, or last-minute crises repeatedly appear before evaluation moments.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The mechanism protects worth or competence from the inference that effortful failure would support.", "role_mapping": "Effort and feedback -> diagnostic evidence; status threat -> motive.", "slug": "self_handicapping", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b061_a01_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The system needs visible effort and accountable learning, but visible effort increases the perceived identity cost of failure. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Public effort, feedback, revision, or partial failure feels like a threat to worth, status, competence, or belonging.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Public effort, feedback, revision, or partial failure feels like a threat to worth, status, competence, or belonging.", "The system needs visible effort and accountable learning, but visible effort increases the perceived identity cost of failure."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Self-Handicapping", "one_liner": "Pre-emptively creating obstacles before an evaluation so any failure can be blamed on the obstacle rather than on one's ability, protecting a fragile self-assessment from disconfirming evidence.", "page_ref": "prime:self_handicapping", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Effort and feedback -> diagnostic evidence; status threat -> motive.", "slug": "self_handicapping", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The mechanism protects worth or competence from the inference that effortful failure would support."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Public effort, feedback, revision, or partial failure feels like a threat to worth, status, competence, or belonging.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The condition explicitly distinguishes protective obstacle-making around evaluation from low efficacy or prior failure as contributors.", "role_mapping": "Obstacle-making -> central mechanism; low efficacy -> context.", "slug": "self_handicapping", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b061_a01_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The defining signal is that the obstacle protects against a painful interpretation of failure: \"I did not really try,\" \"the conditions made it impossible,\" or \"the result does not say anything about my ability.\" The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Low self-efficacy, psychological safety concerns, or prior failure contribute to the pattern, but the central signal is protective obstacle-making around evaluation.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Low self-efficacy, psychological safety concerns, or prior failure contribute to the pattern, but the central signal is protective obstacle-making around evaluation.", "The defining signal is that the obstacle protects against a painful interpretation of failure: \"I did not really try,\" \"the conditions made it impossible,\" or \"the result does not say anything about my ability.\""]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Self-Handicapping", "one_liner": "Pre-emptively creating obstacles before an evaluation so any failure can be blamed on the obstacle rather than on one's ability, protecting a fragile self-assessment from disconfirming evidence.", "page_ref": "prime:self_handicapping", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Obstacle-making -> central mechanism; low efficacy -> context.", "slug": "self_handicapping", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The condition explicitly distinguishes protective obstacle-making around evaluation from low efficacy or prior failure as contributors."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Low self-efficacy, psychological safety concerns, or prior failure contribute to the pattern, but the central signal is protective obstacle-making around evaluation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Existing accountability is either punitive and shame-inducing or so diffuse that effort can remain invisible.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Existing accountability is either punitive and shame-inducing or so diffuse that effort can remain invisible. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Existing accountability is either punitive and shame-inducing or so diffuse that effort can remain invisible."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Existing accountability is either punitive and shame-inducing or so diffuse that effort can remain invisible."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 61, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-061", "ledger_sha256": "f0837c8288ee28ba526915fd46b10f35b9d14794f466bd558993309d1da80e7e"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Self-Hosted Bootstrap Construction", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:self_hosted_bootstrap_construction", "slug": "self_hosted_bootstrap_construction"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 7, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 7, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "7 of 7 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 7}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A target system requires a capability that only the target system or one of its mature descendants can provide. The resulting chicken-and-egg dependency blocks initialization, encourages reliance on an opaque external builder, or produces a fragile sequence of undocumented intermediate stages. Because every descendant inherits from its predecessor, seed defects, hidden privileges, environmental contamination, semantic drift, and missing recovery paths propagate through the whole chain. Ordinary sequencing is insufficient: the design must justify the seed, show that each stage really can produce the next, preserve invariants, make progress, terminate, and transfer authority into a stable self-hosted operating state.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A target system requires a capability that only the target system or one of its mature descendants can provide. The resulting chicken-and-egg dependency blocks initialization, encourages reliance on an opaque external builder, or produces a fragile sequence of undocumented intermediate stages. Because every descendant inherits from its predecessor, seed defects, hidden privileges, environmental contamination, semantic drift, and missing recovery paths propagate through the whole chain. Ordinary sequencing is insufficient: the design must justify the seed, show that each stage really can produce the next, preserve invariants, make progress, terminate, and transfer authority into a stable self-hosted operating state."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime begins when the target capability cannot exist until a simpler predecessor constructs it.", "role_mapping": "Unavailable builder -> target; predecessor -> bootstrap stage.", "slug": "bootstrapping", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b061_a02_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A target system requires a capability that only the target system or one of its mature descendants can provide. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The target builder, controller, runtime, process, or capability is unavailable until a simpler predecessor creates it.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The target builder, controller, runtime, process, or capability is unavailable until a simpler predecessor creates it.", "A target system requires a capability that only the target system or one of its mature descendants can provide."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Bootstrapping", "one_liner": "A system initialises and grows itself from a minimal seed using only its own products, recursively constructing each next stage without an external scaffold, until it reaches its target operating state.", "page_ref": "prime:bootstrapping", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Unavailable builder -> target; predecessor -> bootstrap stage.", "slug": "bootstrapping", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime begins when the target capability cannot exist until a simpler predecessor constructs it."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The target builder, controller, runtime, process, or capability is unavailable until a simpler predecessor creates it.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Bootstrapping resolves a circular dependency by introducing a minimal external seed.", "role_mapping": "Circular prerequisites -> bootstrap loop; seed -> initial break.", "slug": "bootstrapping", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b061_a02_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Prerequisites form a circular dependency that cannot be resolved by ordinary topological ordering alone. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Prerequisites form a circular dependency that cannot be resolved by ordinary topological ordering alone."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Bootstrapping", "one_liner": "A system initialises and grows itself from a minimal seed using only its own products, recursively constructing each next stage without an external scaffold, until it reaches its target operating state.", "page_ref": "prime:bootstrapping", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Circular prerequisites -> bootstrap loop; seed -> initial break.", "slug": "bootstrapping", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Bootstrapping resolves a circular dependency by introducing a minimal external seed."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Prerequisites form a circular dependency that cannot be resolved by ordinary topological ordering alone.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A small trusted artifact able to produce the first internal stage is a defining role.", "role_mapping": "Seed artifact -> trusted base; first stage -> initial output.", "slug": "bootstrapping", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b061_a02_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The seed must be minimal enough to inspect, preserve, and trust, yet capable enough to create the first useful stage. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A small trusted artifact or capability exists that can construct a first internal stage.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A small trusted artifact or capability exists that can construct a first internal stage.", "The seed must be minimal enough to inspect, preserve, and trust, yet capable enough to create the first useful stage."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Bootstrapping", "one_liner": "A system initialises and grows itself from a minimal seed using only its own products, recursively constructing each next stage without an external scaffold, until it reaches its target operating state.", "page_ref": "prime:bootstrapping", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Seed artifact -> trusted base; first stage -> initial output.", "slug": "bootstrapping", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A small trusted artifact able to produce the first internal stage is a defining role."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A small trusted artifact or capability exists that can construct a first internal stage.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Each intermediate output becomes the tool or capacity that constructs its successor.", "role_mapping": "Intermediate output -> next-stage builder.", "slug": "bootstrapping", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b061_a02_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Each intermediate output can become a productive input, tool, controller, or training capacity for its successor. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Each intermediate output can become a productive input, tool, controller, or training capacity for its successor."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Bootstrapping", "one_liner": "A system initialises and grows itself from a minimal seed using only its own products, recursively constructing each next stage without an external scaffold, until it reaches its target operating state.", "page_ref": "prime:bootstrapping", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Intermediate output -> next-stage builder.", "slug": "bootstrapping", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Each intermediate output becomes the tool or capacity that constructs its successor."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Each intermediate output can become a productive input, tool, controller, or training capacity for its successor.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Closure is reached when the final system can rebuild or reproduce its own productive capability.", "role_mapping": "Final system -> self-host; rebuild -> closure.", "slug": "bootstrapping", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b061_a02_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The final system is expected to rebuild, reproduce, upgrade, or recover its own productive capability. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The final system is expected to rebuild, reproduce, upgrade, or recover its own productive capability."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Bootstrapping", "one_liner": "A system initialises and grows itself from a minimal seed using only its own products, recursively constructing each next stage without an external scaffold, until it reaches its target operating state.", "page_ref": "prime:bootstrapping", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Final system -> self-host; rebuild -> closure.", "slug": "bootstrapping", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Closure is reached when the final system can rebuild or reproduce its own productive capability."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The final system is expected to rebuild, reproduce, upgrade, or recover its own productive capability.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The external seed is progressively displaced so it does not remain a hidden permanent dependency.", "role_mapping": "Legacy seed -> external dependency; replacement -> self-host closure.", "slug": "bootstrapping", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b061_a02_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The resulting chicken-and-egg dependency blocks initialization, encourages reliance on an opaque external builder, or produces a fragile sequence of undocumented intermediate stages. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A legacy or external seed must be progressively replaced rather than retained as an opaque permanent dependency.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A legacy or external seed must be progressively replaced rather than retained as an opaque permanent dependency.", "The resulting chicken-and-egg dependency blocks initialization, encourages reliance on an opaque external builder, or produces a fragile sequence of undocumented intermediate stages."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Bootstrapping", "one_liner": "A system initialises and grows itself from a minimal seed using only its own products, recursively constructing each next stage without an external scaffold, until it reaches its target operating state.", "page_ref": "prime:bootstrapping", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Legacy seed -> external dependency; replacement -> self-host closure.", "slug": "bootstrapping", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The external seed is progressively displaced so it does not remain a hidden permanent dependency."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A legacy or external seed must be progressively replaced rather than retained as an opaque permanent dependency.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Distinct stages expand capability and trust until the target can host itself.", "role_mapping": "Stage sequence -> capability ladder; trust profiles -> verification boundaries.", "slug": "bootstrapping", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b061_a02_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The seed must be minimal enough to inspect, preserve, and trust, yet capable enough to create the first useful stage. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Build, runtime, authority, or resource capabilities expand across distinct stages with different trust and risk profiles.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Build, runtime, authority, or resource capabilities expand across distinct stages with different trust and risk profiles.", "The seed must be minimal enough to inspect, preserve, and trust, yet capable enough to create the first useful stage."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Bootstrapping", "one_liner": "A system initialises and grows itself from a minimal seed using only its own products, recursively constructing each next stage without an external scaffold, until it reaches its target operating state.", "page_ref": "prime:bootstrapping", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Stage sequence -> capability ladder; trust profiles -> verification boundaries.", "slug": "bootstrapping", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Distinct stages expand capability and trust until the target can host itself."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Build, runtime, authority, or resource capabilities expand across distinct stages with different trust and risk profiles.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Failures at an intermediate stage can corrupt or strand all later stages unless checkpoints and rollback exist.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The resulting chicken-and-egg dependency blocks initialization, encourages reliance on an opaque external builder, or produces a fragile sequence of undocumented intermediate stages. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: Failures at an intermediate stage can corrupt or strand all later stages unless checkpoints and rollback exist. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Failures at an intermediate stage can corrupt or strand all later stages unless checkpoints and rollback exist.", "The resulting chicken-and-egg dependency blocks initialization, encourages reliance on an opaque external builder, or produces a fragile sequence of undocumented intermediate stages."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 8, "text": "Failures at an intermediate stage can corrupt or strand all later stages unless checkpoints and rollback exist."}, {"display_text": "The organization needs auditable provenance from the seed to the final operating state.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Ordinary sequencing is insufficient: the design must justify the seed, show that each stage really can produce the next, preserve invariants, make progress, terminate, and transfer authority into a stable self-hosted operating state. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: The organization needs auditable provenance from the seed to the final operating state. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [9], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The organization needs auditable provenance from the seed to the final operating state.", "Ordinary sequencing is insufficient: the design must justify the seed, show that each stage really can produce the next, preserve invariants, make progress, terminate, and transfer authority into a stable self-hosted operating state."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 9, "text": "The organization needs auditable provenance from the seed to the final operating state."}, {"display_text": "A clean reconstruction or disaster-recovery path must work after original bootstrap experts or environments are gone.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this deployment constraint: A clean reconstruction or disaster-recovery path must work after original bootstrap experts or environments are gone. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [10], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A clean reconstruction or disaster-recovery path must work after original bootstrap experts or environments are gone."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 10, "text": "A clean reconstruction or disaster-recovery path must work after original bootstrap experts or environments are gone."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 61, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-061", "ledger_sha256": "f0837c8288ee28ba526915fd46b10f35b9d14794f466bd558993309d1da80e7e"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Self-Organization Enablement", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:self_organization_enablement", "slug": "self_organization_enablement"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a mismatch between the need for order and the location of the information needed to create that order. The system needs roles, groups, priorities, matches, practices, or adaptation, but the relevant information is spread across participants. If a central actor tries to define everything, the resulting plan becomes brittle, slow, or misfit. If the central actor withdraws completely, the result may be confusion, duplication, unsafe improvisation, or invisible capture by existing power.\n\nSelf-organization enablement addresses this by shaping the **conditions of formation** rather than the final structure. It asks: what must be true for participants to find one another, understand the purpose, take legitimate action, coordinate around needs, and learn from what emerges?", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system needs coordination, structure, roles, or adaptive action, but central assignment is too slow, uninformed, rigid, legitimacy-poor, or costly. Participants have local knowledge and initiative, yet the conditions for them to find one another and organize are missing or blocked."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P097-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a centralized assignment role and the assignments it produces.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A central planner is responsible for assigning roles, tasks, or equivalent coordination commitments.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve changing coordination demand rather than one static assignment problem.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Work, needs, opportunities, or equivalent coordination demands change over time.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail the directional rate mismatch, not merely slow planning or rapid change in isolation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The coordination demands change faster than the central planner can update assignments.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Coordination-relevant work, needs, or opportunities change faster than a central planner can update role and task assignments.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "coordination demands change faster than central assignment", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P097-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An institution can coordinate stable work and need not involve planner overload.", "slug": "institution"}], "residual_id": "r:self_organization_enablement:b061_a03_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b061_a03_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system needs coordination, structure, roles, or adaptive action, but central assignment is too slow, uninformed, rigid, legitimacy-poor, or costly. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Work, needs, or opportunities are changing faster than a central planner can assign roles and tasks.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Work, needs, or opportunities are changing faster than a central planner can assign roles and tasks.", "A system needs coordination, structure, roles, or adaptive action, but central assignment is too slow, uninformed, rigid, legitimacy-poor, or costly."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An institution can coordinate stable work and need not involve planner overload.", "slug": "institution"}], "normalized_requirement": "Work, needs, or opportunities are changing faster than a central planner can assign roles and tasks.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Work, needs, or opportunities are changing faster than a central planner can assign roles and tasks.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P097-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve situated knowledge holders, local knowledge, and a centralized planning representation.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Situated people hold local knowledge relevant to a situation, while a central plan represents that situation for coordination.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve decision or coordination relevance rather than incidental local detail.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The local knowledge is important to acting on or coordinating the situation.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail an incomplete-capture limit rather than knowledge that is merely not yet documented.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The central plan cannot fully capture the important local knowledge.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "People closest to a situation hold important local knowledge that a central plan cannot fully capture.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "important local knowledge resists full capture in a central plan", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P097-C08-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Institutional rules can be based on fully centralized knowledge.", "slug": "institution"}], "residual_id": "r:self_organization_enablement:b061_a03_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b061_a03_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Participants have local knowledge and initiative, yet the conditions for them to find one another and organize are missing or blocked. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The people closest to the situation have important local knowledge that cannot be fully captured in a central plan.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The people closest to the situation have important local knowledge that cannot be fully captured in a central plan.", "Participants have local knowledge and initiative, yet the conditions for them to find one another and organize are missing or blocked."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Institutional rules can be based on fully centralized knowledge.", "slug": "institution"}], "normalized_requirement": "The people closest to the situation have important local knowledge that cannot be fully captured in a central plan.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The people closest to the situation have important local knowledge that cannot be fully captured in a central plan.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid role can fit actual contributions precisely.", "slug": "role"}], "residual_id": "r:self_organization_enablement:b061_a03_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b061_a03_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system needs coordination, structure, roles, or adaptive action, but central assignment is too slow, uninformed, rigid, legitimacy-poor, or costly. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Predefined roles are likely to misfit the real contribution patterns that will appear during action.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Predefined roles are likely to misfit the real contribution patterns that will appear during action.", "A system needs coordination, structure, roles, or adaptive action, but central assignment is too slow, uninformed, rigid, legitimacy-poor, or costly."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A valid role can fit actual contributions precisely.", "slug": "role"}], "normalized_requirement": "Predefined roles are likely to misfit the real contribution patterns that will appear during action.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Predefined roles are likely to misfit the real contribution patterns that will appear during action.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P097-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve participants, interaction, and an emergent or achieved coordination-order role.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Multiple participants interact in a setting where useful coordination or order is possible.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail participant discovery of dependencies through interaction rather than full advance prescription.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Through interaction, participants discover dependencies.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail participant discovery of available offers through interaction rather than full advance prescription.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Through interaction, participants discover offers.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail participant discovery of coordination gaps through interaction rather than full advance prescription.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Through interaction, participants discover gaps.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail participant discovery of collaboration possibilities through interaction rather than full advance prescription.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Through interaction, participants discover collaborations.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must make discovery of all four named coordination objects necessary for useful order rather than incidental.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "Useful order depends on the conjunctive interaction-mediated discovery of dependencies, offers, gaps, and collaborations.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Useful order depends on participants discovering coordination-relevant dependencies, offers, gaps, and collaborations through interaction.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "useful order depends on interaction-mediated discovery of coordination relations", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P097-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Institutions may prescribe rather than discover dependencies.", "slug": "institution"}], "residual_id": "r:self_organization_enablement:b061_a03_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b061_a03_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when a system needs coordination or structure, but the right structure depends on local knowledge, evolving conditions, participant initiative, or patterns that will only become visible through interaction. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Useful order depends on participants discovering dependencies, offers, gaps, and collaborations through interaction.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Useful order depends on participants discovering dependencies, offers, gaps, and collaborations through interaction.", "Use this archetype when a system needs coordination or structure, but the right structure depends on local knowledge, evolving conditions, participant initiative, or patterns that will only become visible through interaction."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Institutions may prescribe rather than discover dependencies.", "slug": "institution"}], "normalized_requirement": "Useful order depends on participants discovering dependencies, offers, gaps, and collaborations through interaction.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Useful order depends on participants discovering dependencies, offers, gaps, and collaborations through interaction.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The system needs decentralized adaptation but still requires a shared purpose, safety envelope, or legitimacy boundary.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The pattern is a strong fit when people can act responsibly if they understand the purpose, know the boundaries, see the available needs and resources, and receive feedback. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: The system needs decentralized adaptation but still requires a shared purpose, safety envelope, or legitimacy boundary. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The system needs decentralized adaptation but still requires a shared purpose, safety envelope, or legitimacy boundary.", "The pattern is a strong fit when people can act responsibly if they understand the purpose, know the boundaries, see the available needs and resources, and receive feedback."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The system needs decentralized adaptation but still requires a shared purpose, safety envelope, or legitimacy boundary."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 61, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-061", "ledger_sha256": "f0837c8288ee28ba526915fd46b10f35b9d14794f466bd558993309d1da80e7e"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Self-Referential-Paradox Detection and Resolution", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:self_referential_paradox_detection_and_resolution", "slug": "self_referential_paradox_detection_and_resolution"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 5, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 6 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The system needs reflective capacity, but unrestricted reflection becomes circular. A rule must reason about rules; a model must represent its own effects; a category must classify boundary cases; a governance system must amend its own procedures. Without a boundary between object-level and meta-level operations, the system can create paradox, infinite regress, self-erasing authority, or reflexive instability.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A rule, claim, model, category, policy, measurement, or system is allowed to refer to itself in a way that undermines its own validity. The system cannot decide whether the rule applies, whether the claim is true, whether the category includes itself, whether the monitor is reliable, or whether the governing layer can be changed by the governed layer. Ordinary contradiction handling is insufficient because the contradiction is generated by the system's own self-application path."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Self-reference can be consistent and therefore need not instantiate a paradox.", "slug": "paradox"}], "residual_id": "r:self_referential_paradox_detection_and_resolution:b061_a04_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b061_a04_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A rule, claim, model, category, policy, measurement, or system is allowed to refer to itself in a way that undermines its own validity. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A statement, rule, model, category, or procedure makes claims about its own truth, validity, authority, membership, completeness, or update conditions.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A statement, rule, model, category, or procedure makes claims about its own truth, validity, authority, membership, completeness, or update conditions.", "A rule, claim, model, category, policy, measurement, or system is allowed to refer to itself in a way that undermines its own validity."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Self-reference can be consistent and therefore need not instantiate a paradox.", "slug": "paradox"}], "normalized_requirement": "A statement, rule, model, category, or procedure makes claims about its own truth, validity, authority, membership, completeness, or update conditions.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A statement, rule, model, category, or procedure makes claims about its own truth, validity, authority, membership, completeness, or update conditions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P097-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve one system and an identifiable governing layer or element.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A system has rules, monitors, permissions, goals, or equivalent governing elements that regulate its behavior.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve reflexive system-to-governing-layer modification rather than modification by an independent external actor only.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The same system is capable of modifying its own governing element.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the direction from present self-modification to later system governance.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The modified governing element controls the system's future behavior.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the source's capability modality rather than require completed modification.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Self-modification is possible even if it has not yet occurred in the focal instance.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "A governance or software system can modify a governing element that controls its own future behavior.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "system can modify the elements governing its own future behavior", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P097-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Governance does not entail a system modifying the rules that govern its own future behavior.", "slug": "governance"}], "residual_id": "r:self_referential_paradox_detection_and_resolution:b061_a04_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b061_a04_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use it when a system's own rules, labels, measurements, definitions, predictions, or update procedures are part of the domain they govern. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A governance or software system can modify the rules, monitors, permissions, or goals that govern its own future behavior.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A governance or software system can modify the rules, monitors, permissions, or goals that govern its own future behavior.", "Use it when a system's own rules, labels, measurements, definitions, predictions, or update procedures are part of the domain they govern."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Government rules only for outsiders remain policy design.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Policy Design", "one_liner": "The structured activity of crafting an authorised rule for a target population of intentional agents inside an institution, factored into six separable components — frame, goal, target, instrument, implementation, evaluation — so failure can be localized to a slot rather than pronounced globally.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:policy_design", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2"], "guard_type": "OTHER", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "policy_designing_institution_is_self_target", "predicate": "The policy-designing institution is included in its own target population.", "rationale": "The candidate supplies the structural spine and the single emitted qualifier is anchored, atomic, minimal, and does not add a second relation family."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "policy_design"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "policy_designing_institution_is_self_target"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "policy_design", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P097-C10-U1", "why_it_fits": "The self-target guard supplies reflexivity without a new operation."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "External governance remains valid, locating the sole gap.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Governed Relation Vocabulary", "one_liner": "Close a metadata graph's allowed links into a standards-governed vocabulary in which every relation type fixes direction, inverse or symmetry behavior, and the action a consumer may safely take when following it.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:governed_relation_vocabulary", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2"], "guard_type": "OTHER", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "vocabulary_authority_and_graph_form_same_system", "predicate": "The vocabulary-governance authority and the governed graph are constituents of the same sociotechnical system.", "rationale": "The candidate supplies the structural spine and the single emitted qualifier is anchored, atomic, minimal, and does not add a second relation family."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "governed_relation_vocabulary"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "vocabulary_authority_and_graph_form_same_system"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "governed_relation_vocabulary", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P097-C10-U1", "why_it_fits": "The same-system guard supplies only reflexive identity."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "External clients may churn a contractor's requirements.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Requirements Churn", "one_liner": "A project pathology in which the specification changes faster than the execution organization can absorb it — a control-theoretic case where the reference signal outruns the controller's bandwidth, so no spec lives long enough for work to consolidate against it.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:requirements_churn", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2"], "guard_type": "OTHER", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "requirement_setters_and_execution_form_same_system", "predicate": "The requirement-setting stakeholders and execution organization are constituents of the same project system.", "rationale": "The candidate supplies the structural spine and the single emitted qualifier is anchored, atomic, minimal, and does not add a second relation family."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "requirements_churn"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "requirement_setters_and_execution_form_same_system"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "requirements_churn", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P097-C10-U1", "why_it_fits": "The same-project guard supplies only reflexive identity."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A governance or software system can modify the rules, monitors, permissions, or goals that govern its own future behavior.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A self-defeating prediction is one reflexive outcome but need not create logical contradiction.", "slug": "self_defeating_prediction"}], "residual_id": "r:self_referential_paradox_detection_and_resolution:b061_a04_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b061_a04_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use it when a system's own rules, labels, measurements, definitions, predictions, or update procedures are part of the domain they govern. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A forecast, ranking, label, policy, or measurement changes the behavior of the system being forecast, ranked, labeled, governed, or measured.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A forecast, ranking, label, policy, or measurement changes the behavior of the system being forecast, ranked, labeled, governed, or measured.", "Use it when a system's own rules, labels, measurements, definitions, predictions, or update procedures are part of the domain they govern."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A self-defeating prediction is one reflexive outcome but need not create logical contradiction.", "slug": "self_defeating_prediction"}], "normalized_requirement": "A forecast, ranking, label, policy, or measurement changes the behavior of the system being forecast, ranked, labeled, governed, or measured.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A forecast, ranking, label, policy, or measurement changes the behavior of the system being forecast, ranked, labeled, governed, or measured.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Diagonal impossibility requires a construction that escapes every enumerated case, not every self-membership decision.", "slug": "diagonal_impossibility"}], "residual_id": "r:self_referential_paradox_detection_and_resolution:b061_a04_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b061_a04_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The system cannot decide whether the rule applies, whether the claim is true, whether the category includes itself, whether the monitor is reliable, or whether the governing layer can be changed by the governed layer. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A category or set must decide whether it includes itself, its boundary cases, or the rule that defines it.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A category or set must decide whether it includes itself, its boundary cases, or the rule that defines it.", "The system cannot decide whether the rule applies, whether the claim is true, whether the category includes itself, whether the monitor is reliable, or whether the governing layer can be changed by the governed layer."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Diagonal impossibility requires a construction that escapes every enumerated case, not every self-membership decision.", "slug": "diagonal_impossibility"}], "normalized_requirement": "A category or set must decide whether it includes itself, its boundary cases, or the rule that defines it.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A category or set must decide whether it includes itself, its boundary cases, or the rule that defines it.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P097-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve at least two structurally distinct levels rather than one naturally flat system.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A system contains multiple distinct levels of language, rule, authority, representation, or an equivalent layered structure.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail a many-level-to-one-level collapse or conflation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The multiple levels are collapsed into one level.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve loss of level distinction rather than a hierarchy represented within one container.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The resulting level no longer preserves differentiation among the original levels.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Multiple distinct levels of language, rule, authority, or representation are collapsed into one undifferentiated level.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "multiple distinct levels are collapsed into one undifferentiated level", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P097-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Emergence distinguishes explanatory levels but does not entail that object and meta-language have been improperly collapsed.", "slug": "emergence"}], "residual_id": "r:self_referential_paradox_detection_and_resolution:b061_a04_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b061_a04_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Without a boundary between object-level and meta-level operations, the system can create paradox, infinite regress, self-erasing authority, or reflexive instability. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Multiple levels of language, rule, authority, or representation have been collapsed into a single undifferentiated level.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Multiple levels of language, rule, authority, or representation have been collapsed into a single undifferentiated level.", "Without a boundary between object-level and meta-level operations, the system can create paradox, infinite regress, self-erasing authority, or reflexive instability."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Emergence distinguishes explanatory levels but does not entail that object and meta-language have been improperly collapsed.", "slug": "emergence"}], "normalized_requirement": "Multiple levels of language, rule, authority, or representation have been collapsed into a single undifferentiated level.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Multiple levels of language, rule, authority, or representation have been collapsed into a single undifferentiated level.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Some paradoxes are resolved cleanly by type separation without regress.", "slug": "paradox"}], "residual_id": "r:self_referential_paradox_detection_and_resolution:b061_a04_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b061_a04_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Without a boundary between object-level and meta-level operations, the system can create paradox, infinite regress, self-erasing authority, or reflexive instability. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Attempted fixes either produce an infinite regress or simply move the contradiction to a new hidden layer.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Attempted fixes either produce an infinite regress or simply move the contradiction to a new hidden layer.", "Without a boundary between object-level and meta-level operations, the system can create paradox, infinite regress, self-erasing authority, or reflexive instability."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Some paradoxes are resolved cleanly by type separation without regress.", "slug": "paradox"}], "normalized_requirement": "Attempted fixes either produce an infinite regress or simply move the contradiction to a new hidden layer.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Attempted fixes either produce an infinite regress or simply move the contradiction to a new hidden layer.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 61, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-061", "ledger_sha256": "f0837c8288ee28ba526915fd46b10f35b9d14794f466bd558993309d1da80e7e"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Self-Similar Pattern Replication", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:self_similar_pattern_replication", "slug": "self_similar_pattern_replication"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is cross-scale incoherence. A local unit may be well designed, an intermediate unit may be separately well designed, and the whole system may also be well designed, but the levels do not share a recognizable grammar. Every handoff then becomes translation. Every new location reinvents the pattern. Every larger scale either imposes a rigid standard or tolerates uncontrolled fragmentation.\n\nSelf-Similar Pattern Replication addresses the middle path: repeat the pattern enough to preserve coherence, but adapt it enough to fit the scale.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system needs coherence across levels, but each level is designed independently. Local structures, intermediate structures, and system-wide structures use different logics, creating translation friction, coordination gaps, inconsistent expectations, and weak pattern continuity."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P097-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve plural units and a nesting or cross-level containment relation.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A system contains many units nested across levels.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a similarity requirement rather than mere accidental resemblance.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The nested units are expected or required to operate with recognizable similarity.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail actual present incompatibility rather than a future risk only.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The nested units currently violate the similarity requirement through the selected incompatibility.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires format or representation incompatibility across nested units.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The nested units use incompatible formats.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires incompatible role definitions, assignments, or expectations.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The nested units use incompatible roles.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires incompatible cycles, cadences, or operating tempos.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The nested units use incompatible rhythms.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Many nested units that should operate with recognizable similarity instead use incompatible formats, roles, or rhythms.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "nested units requiring recognizable similarity use incompatible operating structures", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P097-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A pattern can recur across unrelated nonnested systems.", "slug": "pattern_in_design"}], "residual_id": "r:self_similar_pattern_replication:b061_a05_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b061_a05_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A system has many nested units that should operate with recognizable similarity but currently use incompatible formats, roles, or rhythms. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A system has many nested units that should operate with recognizable similarity but currently use incompatible formats, roles, or rhythms."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A pattern can recur across unrelated nonnested systems.", "slug": "pattern_in_design"}], "normalized_requirement": "A system has many nested units that should operate with recognizable similarity but currently use incompatible formats, roles, or rhythms.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A system has many nested units that should operate with recognizable similarity but currently use incompatible formats, roles, or rhythms.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Pattern use need not involve nested scale or an existing library.", "slug": "pattern_in_design"}], "residual_id": "r:self_similar_pattern_replication:b061_a05_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b061_a05_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It fits growth, replication, curriculum design, service design, governance, platform design, and distributed operations. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A pattern library, playbook, service model, governance model, or design system is being extended across scale.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A pattern library, playbook, service model, governance model, or design system is being extended across scale.", "It fits growth, replication, curriculum design, service design, governance, platform design, and distributed operations."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Pattern use need not involve nested scale or an existing library.", "slug": "pattern_in_design"}], "normalized_requirement": "A pattern library, playbook, service model, governance model, or design system is being extended across scale.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A pattern library, playbook, service model, governance model, or design system is being extended across scale.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P097-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve repeated problem instances and their shared problem type.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A system encounters recurring local instances of the same kind of problem.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail structural divergence across the local responses.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Different local structures are used for the same problem type.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve independent reinvention as the source of divergence.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The structural differences arise through repeated local reinvention rather than deliberate reuse of one common pattern.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "A system repeatedly reinvents different local structures for recurring instances of the same kind of problem.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "local units repeatedly reinvent different structures for the same problem type", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P097-C13-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A pattern can be adopted before reinvention occurs.", "slug": "pattern_in_design"}], "residual_id": "r:self_similar_pattern_replication:b061_a05_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b061_a05_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Local structures, intermediate structures, and system-wide structures use different logics, creating translation friction, coordination gaps, inconsistent expectations, and weak pattern continuity. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A system repeatedly invents different local structures for the same kind of problem.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A system repeatedly invents different local structures for the same kind of problem.", "Local structures, intermediate structures, and system-wide structures use different logics, creating translation friction, coordination gaps, inconsistent expectations, and weak pattern continuity."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A pattern can be adopted before reinvention occurs.", "slug": "pattern_in_design"}], "normalized_requirement": "A system repeatedly invents different local structures for the same kind of problem.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A system repeatedly invents different local structures for the same kind of problem.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A design pattern can coexist with well-calibrated standardization.", "slug": "pattern_in_design"}], "residual_id": "r:self_similar_pattern_replication:b061_a05_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b061_a05_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Existing standardization is too rigid, while total local customization is too fragmented. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Existing standardization is too rigid, while total local customization is too fragmented."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A design pattern can coexist with well-calibrated standardization.", "slug": "pattern_in_design"}], "normalized_requirement": "Existing standardization is too rigid, while total local customization is too fragmented.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Existing standardization is too rigid, while total local customization is too fragmented.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A solution works well locally and there is pressure to repeat it across teams, regions, modules, or levels.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system needs coherence across levels, but each level is designed independently. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: A solution works well locally and there is pressure to repeat it across teams, regions, modules, or levels. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A solution works well locally and there is pressure to repeat it across teams, regions, modules, or levels.", "A system needs coherence across levels, but each level is designed independently."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "A solution works well locally and there is pressure to repeat it across teams, regions, modules, or levels."}, {"display_text": "Local autonomy is needed, but system-wide coherence is also important.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when a system must coordinate across local, intermediate, and system-wide levels without forcing every level to use a completely different logic. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: Local autonomy is needed, but system-wide coherence is also important. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Local autonomy is needed, but system-wide coherence is also important.", "Use this archetype when a system must coordinate across local, intermediate, and system-wide levels without forcing every level to use a completely different logic."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Local autonomy is needed, but system-wide coherence is also important."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 61, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-061", "ledger_sha256": "f0837c8288ee28ba526915fd46b10f35b9d14794f466bd558993309d1da80e7e"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Self-Targeting Defense Guardrail", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:self_targeting_defense_guardrail", "slug": "self_targeting_defense_guardrail"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 6, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 6, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "6 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A protective apparatus has a harmful response channel that is activated by a classification decision. When the classifier mislabels legitimate self as threat, the apparatus engages the self target with the same intensity designed for adversaries, producing internal damage, wrongful exclusion, denial of service, sanctions, immune-like attack, or mission failure.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A protective apparatus has a harmful response channel that is activated by a classification decision. When the classifier mislabels legitimate self as threat, the apparatus engages the self target with the same intensity designed for adversaries, producing internal damage, wrongful exclusion, denial of service, sanctions, immune-like attack, or mission failure."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime requires a self/non-self or trusted/threat classifier controlling defensive response.", "role_mapping": "Classifier -> identity judgment; legitimate entities -> protected self.", "slug": "self_engagement_under_misclassification", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b061_a06_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "When the classifier mislabels legitimate self as threat, the apparatus engages the self target with the same intensity designed for adversaries, producing internal damage, wrongful exclusion, denial of service, sanctions, immune-like attack, or mission failure. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A system uses an automated, institutional, or procedural classifier to distinguish self, trusted, permitted, or legitimate entities from threats, violations, intruders, or adversaries.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A system uses an automated, institutional, or procedural classifier to distinguish self, trusted, permitted, or legitimate entities from threats, violations, intruders, or adversaries.", "When the classifier mislabels legitimate self as threat, the apparatus engages the self target with the same intensity designed for adversaries, producing internal damage, wrongful exclusion, denial of service, sanctions, immune-like attack, or mission failure."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Self Engagement Under Misclassification", "one_liner": "A defensive apparatus inflicts its full harm on self when its classifier misfires, because the protection machinery and the harm machinery are the same machinery gated only by the classifier.", "page_ref": "prime:self_engagement_under_misclassification", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Classifier -> identity judgment; legitimate entities -> protected self.", "slug": "self_engagement_under_misclassification", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime requires a self/non-self or trusted/threat classifier controlling defensive response."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A system uses an automated, institutional, or procedural classifier to distinguish self, trusted, permitted, or legitimate entities from threats, violations, intruders, or adversaries.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A positive threat classification activates a materially damaging defensive actuator.", "role_mapping": "Positive result -> threat label; harm -> self-engagement.", "slug": "self_engagement_under_misclassification", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b061_a06_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "When the classifier mislabels legitimate self as threat, the apparatus engages the self target with the same intensity designed for adversaries, producing internal damage, wrongful exclusion, denial of service, sanctions, immune-like attack, or mission failure. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The response to a positive classification can impose material harm, deprivation, exclusion, destruction, quarantine, sanction, throttling, denial, or reputational damage.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The response to a positive classification can impose material harm, deprivation, exclusion, destruction, quarantine, sanction, throttling, denial, or reputational damage.", "When the classifier mislabels legitimate self as threat, the apparatus engages the self target with the same intensity designed for adversaries, producing internal damage, wrongful exclusion, denial of service, sanctions, immune-like attack, or mission failure."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Self Engagement Under Misclassification", "one_liner": "A defensive apparatus inflicts its full harm on self when its classifier misfires, because the protection machinery and the harm machinery are the same machinery gated only by the classifier.", "page_ref": "prime:self_engagement_under_misclassification", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Positive result -> threat label; harm -> self-engagement.", "slug": "self_engagement_under_misclassification", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A positive threat classification activates a materially damaging defensive actuator."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The response to a positive classification can impose material harm, deprivation, exclusion, destruction, quarantine, sanction, throttling, denial, or reputational damage.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Noisy, stale, biased, or spoofable identity evidence creates the misclassification route.", "role_mapping": "Evidence -> classifier input; error -> false positive.", "slug": "self_engagement_under_misclassification", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b061_a06_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Classification evidence is noisy, context-sensitive, adversarially spoofable, base-rate sensitive, stale, biased, or incomplete. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Classification evidence is noisy, context-sensitive, adversarially spoofable, base-rate sensitive, stale, biased, or incomplete."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Self Engagement Under Misclassification", "one_liner": "A defensive apparatus inflicts its full harm on self when its classifier misfires, because the protection machinery and the harm machinery are the same machinery gated only by the classifier.", "page_ref": "prime:self_engagement_under_misclassification", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Evidence -> classifier input; error -> false positive.", "slug": "self_engagement_under_misclassification", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Noisy, stale, biased, or spoofable identity evidence creates the misclassification route."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Classification evidence is noisy, context-sensitive, adversarially spoofable, base-rate sensitive, stale, biased, or incomplete.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The defensive response commonly commits harm faster than classification error can be reversed or repaired.", "role_mapping": "Fast trigger -> actuator; slow repair -> asymmetric reversibility.", "slug": "self_engagement_under_misclassification", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b061_a06_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A protective apparatus has a harmful response channel that is activated by a classification decision. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The response channel is easier or faster to trigger than to reverse, compensate, or repair.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The response channel is easier or faster to trigger than to reverse, compensate, or repair.", "A protective apparatus has a harmful response channel that is activated by a classification decision."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Self Engagement Under Misclassification", "one_liner": "A defensive apparatus inflicts its full harm on self when its classifier misfires, because the protection machinery and the harm machinery are the same machinery gated only by the classifier.", "page_ref": "prime:self_engagement_under_misclassification", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Fast trigger -> actuator; slow repair -> asymmetric reversibility.", "slug": "self_engagement_under_misclassification", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The defensive response commonly commits harm faster than classification error can be reversed or repaired."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The response channel is easier or faster to trigger than to reverse, compensate, or repair.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Missing timely appeal or safe review removes the protected-self correction path.", "role_mapping": "No appeal -> absent override; serious harm -> actuator consequence.", "slug": "self_engagement_under_misclassification", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b061_a06_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The protected party has no timely appeal, override, independent review, or safe containment route before serious harm occurs. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The protected party has no timely appeal, override, independent review, or safe containment route before serious harm occurs."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Self Engagement Under Misclassification", "one_liner": "A defensive apparatus inflicts its full harm on self when its classifier misfires, because the protection machinery and the harm machinery are the same machinery gated only by the classifier.", "page_ref": "prime:self_engagement_under_misclassification", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "No appeal -> absent override; serious harm -> actuator consequence.", "slug": "self_engagement_under_misclassification", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Missing timely appeal or safe review removes the protected-self correction path."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The protected party has no timely appeal, override, independent review, or safe containment route before serious harm occurs.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Collapsing classifier and actuator prevents independent authorization and recovery checks.", "role_mapping": "Unified control -> direct judgment-action coupling.", "slug": "self_engagement_under_misclassification", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b061_a06_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The classifier and actuator are managed as one control rather than as separable judgment, authorization, response, and recovery layers. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The classifier and actuator are managed as one control rather than as separable judgment, authorization, response, and recovery layers."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Self Engagement Under Misclassification", "one_liner": "A defensive apparatus inflicts its full harm on self when its classifier misfires, because the protection machinery and the harm machinery are the same machinery gated only by the classifier.", "page_ref": "prime:self_engagement_under_misclassification", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Unified control -> direct judgment-action coupling.", "slug": "self_engagement_under_misclassification", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Collapsing classifier and actuator prevents independent authorization and recovery checks."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The classifier and actuator are managed as one control rather than as separable judgment, authorization, response, and recovery layers.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Operational pressure rewards decisive defensive action and underprices false self-engagement.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The defense must act quickly enough to stop real threats, but every increase in speed, automation, and response intensity raises the cost of a false positive against self. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Operational pressure rewards decisive defensive action and underprices false self-engagement. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Operational pressure rewards decisive defensive action and underprices false self-engagement.", "The defense must act quickly enough to stop real threats, but every increase in speed, automation, and response intensity raises the cost of a false positive against self."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Operational pressure rewards decisive defensive action and underprices false self-engagement."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 61, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-061", "ledger_sha256": "f0837c8288ee28ba526915fd46b10f35b9d14794f466bd558993309d1da80e7e"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Semantic Drift Monitoring", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:semantic_drift_monitoring", "slug": "semantic_drift_monitoring"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is temporal instability in shared meaning. A community behaves as if a term has one stable meaning, but the actual interpretive environment has changed. Older documents, current practice, official definitions, and stakeholder expectations no longer line up.\n\nThis problem often hides because the surface form remains constant. Everyone still says the same word, sees the same label, or uses the same code. The divergence appears only when decisions differ: one team treats a term as broad, another as narrow; one reader applies a current meaning to an old record; one audience hears a neutral label while another hears a loaded or outdated one.\n\nThe root tension is that coordination requires stable meaning, while living language changes. New technologies, social contexts, product lines, legal interpretations, cultural memories, and institutional practices can all shift what a sign evokes.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A term, symbol, label, category name, code, or phrase is used as though its meaning were stable, while different time periods, groups, documents, or systems now interpret it differently."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P097-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a definition and both its origin and current-use contexts.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A definition has an identifiable creation context and a current use context.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail a meaningful context difference rather than continued use within one unchanged setting.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The current use context differs from the creation context.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the source's origin-to-current-use temporal direction.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Creation in the original context precedes reuse in the different context.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "A definition created in one era, community, product version, legal context, or organizational phase is now used in another.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "definition created in one context is reused in a different context", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P097-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Instrument interpretation can drift within one era without a lexical definition moving communities.", "slug": "instrument_interpretive_drift"}], "residual_id": "r:semantic_drift_monitoring:b061_a07_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b061_a07_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "New technologies, social contexts, product lines, legal interpretations, cultural memories, and institutional practices can all shift what a sign evokes. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A definition was created in one era, community, product version, legal context, or organizational phase but is now used in another.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A definition was created in one era, community, product version, legal context, or organizational phase but is now used in another.", "New technologies, social contexts, product lines, legal interpretations, cultural memories, and institutional practices can all shift what a sign evokes."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "One unchanged ontology can author and use a definition internally.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Textual Definition", "one_liner": "Attach to a term in a controlled vocabulary a stable natural-language statement of the conditions under which it is correctly applied, converting a privately-interpreted label into a publicly consultable boundary that serves as the appeal of last resort in annotation disputes.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:textual_definition", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "receiving_context_differs_from_definition_authoring_context", "predicate": "The receiving system's context differs materially from the definition-authoring context.", "rationale": "The candidate supplies the structural spine and the single emitted qualifier is anchored, atomic, minimal, and does not add a second relation family."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "textual_definition"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "receiving_context_differs_from_definition_authoring_context"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "textual_definition", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P097-C14-U1", "why_it_fits": "One context-difference fact produces cross-context reuse."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Without the bridge the candidate has meaning history but no definition role.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_BRIDGE", "name": "Etymological fallacy", "one_liner": "Treat a word's historical origin as binding on its present meaning, mistaking a fact about language history for a fact about how today's speakers actually use the word.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:etymological_fallacy", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "TYPE_SUBSUMPTION", "kind": "INTERPRETIVE_BRIDGE", "normalized_key": "documented_lexical_sense_is_community_definition", "predicate": "A documented lexical sense is a definition of the term within the speech community using that sense.", "rationale": "The candidate supplies the structural spine and the single emitted qualifier is anchored, atomic, minimal, and does not add a second relation family."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "etymological_fallacy"}, {"kind": "INTERPRETIVE_BRIDGE", "value": "documented_lexical_sense_is_community_definition"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "etymological_fallacy", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P097-C14-U1", "why_it_fits": "The lexical-sense bridge resolves the sole role-type gap."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A definition was created in one era, community, product version, legal context, or organizational phase but is now used in another.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P097-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a term, an existing audience, and a distinct new-audience role.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A term is used by an existing audience and can be encountered by one or more additional audiences.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail diffusion or uptake across the audience boundary.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Use of the term spreads into the new audience or audiences.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve directional spread rather than simultaneous unrelated coinage.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The new-audience use follows or expands beyond the earlier audience distribution.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "A term is spreading from an existing audience into new audiences.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "term diffuses into new audiences", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P097-C15-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P097-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve one term and comparable earlier and later meaning states.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A term has an earlier semantic extension and a later or developing sense.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail extension contraction rather than mere synonym replacement.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The later sense applies to a narrower, more specialized extension than the earlier sense.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the direction of semantic change over time.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The narrowing proceeds from the earlier broader sense toward the specialized sense.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "A term's sense is narrowing over time to a more specialized meaning.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "term narrows to a specialized sense", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P097-C15-U2"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P097-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve one term and comparable earlier and later meaning states.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A term has an earlier semantic extension and a later or developing sense.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail extension expansion rather than only increased usage frequency.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The later sense applies to more cases than the earlier sense.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the direction of semantic change over time.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The broadening proceeds from the earlier narrower sense toward the expanded sense.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "A term's sense is broadening over time to cover more cases.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "term broadens to cover more cases", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P097-C15-U3"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P097-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve one term and comparable earlier and later valence states.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A term has an earlier valence and a later or developing evaluative meaning.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve directional change rather than static connotation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The term is acquiring a valence different from its earlier valence.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires change in affective tone or emotional association.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The term acquires a changed emotional valence.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires change in approval, disapproval, obligation, permissibility, or status meaning.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The term acquires a changed normative valence.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A term is acquiring a changed emotional or normative valence.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "term acquires a changed emotional or normative valence", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P097-C15-U4"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Instrument drift concerns mapping readings to meaning, not necessarily a term's extension.", "slug": "instrument_interpretive_drift"}], "residual_id": "r:semantic_drift_monitoring:b061_a07_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b061_a07_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Do not use this archetype just because a term is unfamiliar to one audience. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A term is spreading into new audiences, narrowing to a specialized sense, broadening to cover more cases, or acquiring a changed emotional or normative valence.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A term is spreading into new audiences, narrowing to a specialized sense, broadening to cover more cases, or acquiring a changed emotional or normative valence.", "Do not use this archetype just because a term is unfamiliar to one audience."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PARTIALLY_DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A broadened case definition remains drift.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Case-Definition Drift", "one_liner": "The surveillance failure in which the operational definition of 'a case' silently changes across time, place, or data source while counts are still reported and compared under a stable label — conflating real epidemiological change with an artefact of what the instrument now counts.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:case_definition_drift", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "revised_case_definition_tightens_label_extension", "predicate": "The revised case definition tightens the stable label's extension.", "rationale": "The candidate supplies the structural spine and the single emitted qualifier is anchored, atomic, minimal, and does not add a second relation family."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "case_definition_drift"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "revised_case_definition_tightens_label_extension"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "case_definition_drift", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P097-C15-U2", "why_it_fits": "The tightening guard selects the explicit direction."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_GUARDED_EQUIVALENT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A widening instance locates the sole branch gap.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Semantic Narrowing and Widening", "one_liner": "Expand/contract meaning.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:semantic_narrowing_widening", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "semantic_shift_subtype_is_narrowing", "predicate": "The candidate's directional subtype is narrowing: the later reference set is smaller than the earlier one.", "rationale": "The candidate supplies the structural spine and the single emitted qualifier is anchored, atomic, minimal, and does not add a second relation family."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "semantic_narrowing_widening"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "semantic_shift_subtype_is_narrowing"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "semantic_narrowing_widening", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P097-C15-U2", "why_it_fits": "The narrowing guard selects the explicit contraction subtype."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A pejorative divergence need not narrow.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Etymological fallacy", "one_liner": "Treat a word's historical origin as binding on its present meaning, mistaking a fact about language history for a fact about how today's speakers actually use the word.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:etymological_fallacy", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "historical_to_current_shift_is_semantic_narrowing", "predicate": "The historical-to-current semantic shift is narrowing of the term's reference set.", "rationale": "The candidate supplies the structural spine and the single emitted qualifier is anchored, atomic, minimal, and does not add a second relation family."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "etymological_fallacy"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "historical_to_current_shift_is_semantic_narrowing"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "etymological_fallacy", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P097-C15-U2", "why_it_fits": "The narrowing guard selects a named candidate subtype."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A tightened case definition remains drift.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Case-Definition Drift", "one_liner": "The surveillance failure in which the operational definition of 'a case' silently changes across time, place, or data source while counts are still reported and compared under a stable label — conflating real epidemiological change with an artefact of what the instrument now counts.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:case_definition_drift", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "revised_case_definition_broadens_label_extension", "predicate": "The revised case definition broadens the stable label's extension.", "rationale": "The candidate supplies the structural spine and the single emitted qualifier is anchored, atomic, minimal, and does not add a second relation family."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "case_definition_drift"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "revised_case_definition_broadens_label_extension"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "case_definition_drift", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P097-C15-U3", "why_it_fits": "The broadening guard selects the explicit direction."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_GUARDED_EQUIVALENT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A narrowing instance locates the sole branch gap.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Semantic Narrowing and Widening", "one_liner": "Expand/contract meaning.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:semantic_narrowing_widening", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "semantic_shift_subtype_is_widening", "predicate": "The candidate's directional subtype is widening: the later reference set is larger than the earlier one.", "rationale": "The candidate supplies the structural spine and the single emitted qualifier is anchored, atomic, minimal, and does not add a second relation family."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "semantic_narrowing_widening"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "semantic_shift_subtype_is_widening"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "semantic_narrowing_widening", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P097-C15-U3", "why_it_fits": "The widening guard selects the explicit expansion subtype."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A pejorative divergence need not widen.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Etymological fallacy", "one_liner": "Treat a word's historical origin as binding on its present meaning, mistaking a fact about language history for a fact about how today's speakers actually use the word.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:etymological_fallacy", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O2"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "historical_to_current_shift_is_semantic_widening", "predicate": "The historical-to-current semantic shift is widening of the term's reference set.", "rationale": "The candidate supplies the structural spine and the single emitted qualifier is anchored, atomic, minimal, and does not add a second relation family."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "etymological_fallacy"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "historical_to_current_shift_is_semantic_widening"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "etymological_fallacy", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P097-C15-U3", "why_it_fits": "The widening guard selects a named candidate subtype."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_SYNTHESIS", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "An etymological fallacy may concern broadening, narrowing, or metaphor without valence change; selecting the explicitly named pejoration-or-amelioration branch makes the emotional-valence DNF branch unavoidable.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Etymological fallacy", "one_liner": "Treat a word's historical origin as binding on its present meaning, mistaking a fact about language history for a fact about how today's speakers actually use the word.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:etymological_fallacy", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1", "O2", "O3"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "historical_to_current_shift_changes_emotional_valence", "predicate": "The historical-to-current semantic shift is pejoration or amelioration of the term's emotional valence.", "rationale": "The candidate supplies the structural spine and the single emitted qualifier is anchored, atomic, minimal, and does not add a second relation family."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "etymological_fallacy"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "historical_to_current_shift_changes_emotional_valence"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "etymological_fallacy", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P097-C15-U4", "why_it_fits": "The original branch selector omitted the valence-role obligation. A single corrected selector for the record's named pejoration-or-amelioration trajectory fills O1, O2, and O3 without adding a second fact."}], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 4, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 3, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Instrument drift concerns mapping readings to meaning, not necessarily a term's extension.", "slug": "instrument_interpretive_drift"}], "normalized_requirement": "A term is spreading into new audiences, narrowing to a specialized sense, broadening to cover more cases, or acquiring a changed emotional or normative valence.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "PARTIAL_EXISTING_DSA_GROUNDING", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation grounded 3 of 4 eligible atomic units; the remaining unit or units stayed open."}, "predicate": "A term is spreading into new audiences, narrowing to a specialized sense, broadening to cover more cases, or acquiring a changed emotional or normative valence.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Interpretive drift can affect current instruments with no historical documents retained.", "slug": "instrument_interpretive_drift"}], "residual_id": "r:semantic_drift_monitoring:b061_a07_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b061_a07_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Older documents, current practice, official definitions, and stakeholder expectations no longer line up. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Historical documents, standards, code, policies, or records remain active while current usage has shifted.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Historical documents, standards, code, policies, or records remain active while current usage has shifted.", "Older documents, current practice, official definitions, and stakeholder expectations no longer line up."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Interpretive drift can affect current instruments with no historical documents retained.", "slug": "instrument_interpretive_drift"}], "normalized_requirement": "Historical documents, standards, code, policies, or records remain active while current usage has shifted.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Historical documents, standards, code, policies, or records remain active while current usage has shifted.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime requires one expression to carry multiple senses, including locally remembered meanings across communities.", "role_mapping": "Same word -> form; different local meanings -> senses.", "slug": "polysemy", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b061_a07_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use Semantic Drift Monitoring when the same sign form carries different meanings because usage has changed over time or across evolving communities. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Different teams or communities coordinate around the same word but bring different remembered or local meanings to it.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Different teams or communities coordinate around the same word but bring different remembered or local meanings to it.", "Use Semantic Drift Monitoring when the same sign form carries different meanings because usage has changed over time or across evolving communities."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Polysemy", "one_liner": "Multiple meanings.", "page_ref": "prime:polysemy", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Same word -> form; different local meanings -> senses.", "slug": "polysemy", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime requires one expression to carry multiple senses, including locally remembered meanings across communities."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Different teams or communities coordinate around the same word but bring different remembered or local meanings to it.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "People repeatedly ask clarifying questions about a familiar term or use it in incompatible ways.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: People repeatedly ask clarifying questions about a familiar term or use it in incompatible ways. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["People repeatedly ask clarifying questions about a familiar term or use it in incompatible ways."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "People repeatedly ask clarifying questions about a familiar term or use it in incompatible ways."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 61, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-061", "ledger_sha256": "f0837c8288ee28ba526915fd46b10f35b9d14794f466bd558993309d1da80e7e"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Sense-Act Loop Coupling", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:sense_act_loop_coupling", "slug": "sense_act_loop_coupling"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 5 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A person, team, or machine treats perception as passive input that should be completed before action, even though the environment, viewpoint, and available cues change through action; the result is stale awareness, analysis paralysis, unsafe improvisation, or action that is not informed by what the previous move made visible.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A person, team, or machine treats perception as passive input that should be completed before action, even though the environment, viewpoint, and available cues change through action; the result is stale awareness, analysis paralysis, unsafe improvisation, or action that is not informed by what the previous move made visible."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A perception-action loop can operate in a fully observable environment.", "slug": "perception_action_loop"}], "residual_id": "r:sense_act_loop_coupling:b061_a08_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b061_a08_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The environment is partially observable, occluded, ambiguous, fast-changing, or dependent on the agent’s position or interaction posture. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The environment is partially observable, occluded, ambiguous, fast-changing, or dependent on the agent’s position or interaction posture."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A perception-action loop can operate in a fully observable environment.", "slug": "perception_action_loop"}], "normalized_requirement": "The environment is partially observable, occluded, ambiguous, fast-changing, or dependent on the agent’s position or interaction posture.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The environment is partially observable, occluded, ambiguous, fast-changing, or dependent on the agent’s position or interaction posture.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P098-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a small action taken under incomplete knowledge of the relevant situation.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An actor can take a small action while relevant conditions remain incompletely known.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail information disclosure produced by acting, not merely action following prior analysis.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Taking the small action can reveal an otherwise hidden feature of the situation.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the cost advantage relative to waiting for complete analysis.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Revelation through the small action can cost less than waiting for complete analysis.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve possibility without asserting that every small action reveals information cheaply.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The revelation and comparative cost advantage are possible rather than guaranteed.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when the small action can reveal hidden state.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The feature revealed is hidden state.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when the small action can reveal affordances.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The feature revealed is affordances.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when the small action can reveal constraints.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The feature revealed is constraints.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when the small action can reveal risks.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The feature revealed is risks.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A small action can reveal a hidden feature of a situation more cheaply than waiting for complete analysis.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "small action reveals hidden situational information more cheaply than complete analysis", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P098-C01-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Actions in the loop may pursue the task rather than information gain.", "slug": "perception_action_loop"}], "residual_id": "r:sense_act_loop_coupling:b061_a08_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b061_a08_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A person, team, or machine treats perception as passive input that should be completed before action, even though the environment, viewpoint, and available cues change through action; the result is stale awareness, analysis paralysis, unsafe improvisation, or action that is not informed by what the previous move made visible. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Small actions can reveal hidden state, affordances, constraints, or risks more cheaply than waiting for complete analysis.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Small actions can reveal hidden state, affordances, constraints, or risks more cheaply than waiting for complete analysis.", "A person, team, or machine treats perception as passive input that should be completed before action, even though the environment, viewpoint, and available cues change through action; the result is stale awareness, analysis paralysis, unsafe improvisation, or action that is not informed by what the previous move made visible."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Actions in the loop may pursue the task rather than information gain.", "slug": "perception_action_loop"}], "normalized_requirement": "Small actions can reveal hidden state, affordances, constraints, or risks more cheaply than waiting for complete analysis.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Small actions can reveal hidden state, affordances, constraints, or risks more cheaply than waiting for complete analysis.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact loop requires action to change the sensory field and the resulting perception to guide later action.", "role_mapping": "Movement -> action; changed cues -> next perception.", "slug": "perception_action_loop", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b061_a08_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A person, team, or machine treats perception as passive input that should be completed before action, even though the environment, viewpoint, and available cues change through action; the result is stale awareness, analysis paralysis, unsafe improvisation, or action that is not informed by what the previous move made visible. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The actor’s movement, question, manipulation, prototype, or tool use changes which cues become available.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The actor’s movement, question, manipulation, prototype, or tool use changes which cues become available.", "A person, team, or machine treats perception as passive input that should be completed before action, even though the environment, viewpoint, and available cues change through action; the result is stale awareness, analysis paralysis, unsafe improvisation, or action that is not informed by what the previous move made visible."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Perception Action Loop", "one_liner": "Perception and action are constitutively coupled: action moves the sensing apparatus, that movement changes what is sensed, and what is sensed becomes the basis for the next action, in one closed loop with no clean sense-think-act stages.", "page_ref": "prime:perception_action_loop", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Movement -> action; changed cues -> next perception.", "slug": "perception_action_loop", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact loop requires action to change the sensory field and the resulting perception to guide later action."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The actor’s movement, question, manipulation, prototype, or tool use changes which cues become available.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P098-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve knowing and acting as distinct work roles.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "The work includes a knowledge activity and an action activity.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail channel separation between knowledge and action rather than mere temporal ordering.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Knowing is handled in a different channel from acting.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail separation as a cause of the knowledge-action gap.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The channel separation produces a gap between knowledge and action.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Work has a knowledge-action gap because knowing and acting occur in separate channels.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "separate channels for knowing and acting cause a knowledge-action gap", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P098-C02-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The loop itself integrates sensing and action and need not follow a prior channel split.", "slug": "perception_action_loop"}], "residual_id": "r:sense_act_loop_coupling:b061_a08_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b061_a08_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The work has a knowledge-action gap because knowing is handled in one channel while acting happens in another. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The work has a knowledge-action gap because knowing is handled in one channel while acting happens in another."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The loop itself integrates sensing and action and need not follow a prior channel split.", "slug": "perception_action_loop"}], "normalized_requirement": "The work has a knowledge-action gap because knowing is handled in one channel while acting happens in another.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The work has a knowledge-action gap because knowing is handled in one channel while acting happens in another.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P098-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail separation of observation from practice, not merely the presence of both.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Observation is separated from practice in an activity intended to support performance.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail the separation as a cause of failure at use time.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "That separation causes failure when the learned or operational capability must be used.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve use-time failure rather than only earlier inconvenience.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The failure occurs at the moment of use.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by separation within training.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The separating activity is training.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by separation produced through interface design.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The separating activity is interface design.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by separation within field operations.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The separating activity is field operations.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when learners fail at use time.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The affected actor is a learner.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when operators fail at use time.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The affected actor is an operator.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "An activity separates observation from practice, causing its learner or operator to fail at the moment of use.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "separating observation from practice causes use-time failure", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P098-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Perception-action coupling is not necessarily a training problem.", "slug": "perception_action_loop"}], "residual_id": "r:sense_act_loop_coupling:b061_a08_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b061_a08_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Training, interface design, or field operations separate observation from practice so learners or operators fail at the moment of use. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Training, interface design, or field operations separate observation from practice so learners or operators fail at the moment of use."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Perception-action coupling is not necessarily a training problem.", "slug": "perception_action_loop"}], "normalized_requirement": "Training, interface design, or field operations separate observation from practice so learners or operators fail at the moment of use.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Training, interface design, or field operations separate observation from practice so learners or operators fail at the moment of use.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Decision quality depends on maintaining situation awareness while the system keeps moving.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Decision quality depends on maintaining situation awareness while the system keeps moving. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Decision quality depends on maintaining situation awareness while the system keeps moving."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Decision quality depends on maintaining situation awareness while the system keeps moving."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 61, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-061", "ledger_sha256": "f0837c8288ee28ba526915fd46b10f35b9d14794f466bd558993309d1da80e7e"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Sense-Experience Reduction Protocol", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:sense_experience_reduction_protocol", "slug": "sense_experience_reduction_protocol"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A claim refers to an object, property, state, or hidden entity, but the claim is not connected to any clear account of what experiences, observations, measurements, or reports would make it meaningful, confirmable, disconfirmable, or distinct from alternative claims.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A claim refers to an object, property, state, or hidden entity, but the claim is not connected to any clear account of what experiences, observations, measurements, or reports would make it meaningful, confirmable, disconfirmable, or distinct from alternative claims."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Phenomenalism explicitly translates object claims into experience and need not exhibit the stated inability.", "slug": "phenomenalism"}], "residual_id": "r:sense_experience_reduction_protocol:b061_a09_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b061_a09_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A claim refers to an object, property, state, or hidden entity, but the claim is not connected to any clear account of what experiences, observations, measurements, or reports would make it meaningful, confirmable, disconfirmable, or distinct from alternative claims. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A concept or object claim is being debated but participants cannot say what would be experienced if the claim were true.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A concept or object claim is being debated but participants cannot say what would be experienced if the claim were true.", "A claim refers to an object, property, state, or hidden entity, but the claim is not connected to any clear account of what experiences, observations, measurements, or reports would make it meaningful, confirmable, disconfirmable, or distinct from alternative claims."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Phenomenalism explicitly translates object claims into experience and need not exhibit the stated inability.", "slug": "phenomenalism"}], "normalized_requirement": "A concept or object claim is being debated but participants cannot say what would be experienced if the claim were true.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A concept or object claim is being debated but participants cannot say what would be experienced if the claim were true.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A phenomenalist reduction can state precise access conditions.", "slug": "phenomenalism"}], "residual_id": "r:sense_experience_reduction_protocol:b061_a09_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b061_a09_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A claim refers to an object, property, state, or hidden entity, but the claim is not connected to any clear account of what experiences, observations, measurements, or reports would make it meaningful, confirmable, disconfirmable, or distinct from alternative claims. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A theoretical entity, psychological state, social condition, or system property is treated as real while access conditions are vague.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A theoretical entity, psychological state, social condition, or system property is treated as real while access conditions are vague.", "A claim refers to an object, property, state, or hidden entity, but the claim is not connected to any clear account of what experiences, observations, measurements, or reports would make it meaningful, confirmable, disconfirmable, or distinct from alternative claims."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A phenomenalist reduction can state precise access conditions.", "slug": "phenomenalism"}], "normalized_requirement": "A theoretical entity, psychological state, social condition, or system property is treated as real while access conditions are vague.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A theoretical entity, psychological state, social condition, or system property is treated as real while access conditions are vague.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P098-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve multiple interpreters and one shared term.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Two or more interpreters use the same term.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail a difference in expected experiential confirmation, not merely different vocabulary.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The interpreters expect different experiential confirmations for that term.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by a difference among observers.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The interpreters are different observers.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by a difference across disciplines.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The interpreters belong to different disciplines.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Different interpreters use the same term while expecting different experiential confirmations.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "same term carries different expected experiential confirmations across interpreters", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P098-C04-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Observers may agree on the experience mapping.", "slug": "phenomenalism"}], "residual_id": "r:sense_experience_reduction_protocol:b061_a09_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b061_a09_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Different observers or disciplines use the same term while expecting different experiential confirmations. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Different observers or disciplines use the same term while expecting different experiential confirmations."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Observers may agree on the experience mapping.", "slug": "phenomenalism"}], "normalized_requirement": "Different observers or disciplines use the same term while expecting different experiential confirmations.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Different observers or disciplines use the same term while expecting different experiential confirmations.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P098-C05", "dnf": [], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [], "predicate": "An operational definition exists but may be too thin.", "resolution": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RESIDUAL", "semantic_scope": "NON_ABSTRACTION", "structural_head": "operational definition may lack sufficient detail", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P098-C05-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P098-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve an operational definition and the phenomenon it is intended to represent.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A phenomenon has an operational definition.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail dependence on a proxy in constructing or applying the operational definition.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The operational definition is driven by a proxy rather than directly by the phenomenon.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the possibility qualifier.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The proxy dependence is possible rather than established in every case.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "An operational definition exists but may be driven by a proxy for the lived phenomenon.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "operational definition may be driven by a proxy", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P098-C05-U2"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P098-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve both the lived phenomenon and its operational definition.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A lived phenomenon has an operational definition.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail possible absence of a representational connection to the lived phenomenon.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The operational definition may be disconnected from the lived phenomenon.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the possibility qualifier.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The disconnection is possible rather than asserted as certain.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "An operational definition exists but may be disconnected from the lived phenomenon.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "operational definition may be disconnected from lived phenomenon", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P098-C05-U3"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A phenomenal reduction can be rich and faithful rather than proxy-thin.", "slug": "phenomenalism"}], "residual_id": "r:sense_experience_reduction_protocol:b061_a09_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b061_a09_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: An operational definition exists but may be too thin, proxy-driven, or disconnected from the lived phenomenon. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["An operational definition exists but may be too thin, proxy-driven, or disconnected from the lived phenomenon."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 2, "non_abstraction_units": 1, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 2}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A phenomenal reduction can be rich and faithful rather than proxy-thin.", "slug": "phenomenalism"}], "normalized_requirement": "An operational definition exists but may be too thin, proxy-driven, or disconnected from the lived phenomenon.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 2 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "An operational definition exists but may be too thin, proxy-driven, or disconnected from the lived phenomenon.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A claim is too private, introspective, remote, microscopic, historical, or instrument-mediated for direct ordinary observation.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A claim refers to an object, property, state, or hidden entity, but the claim is not connected to any clear account of what experiences, observations, measurements, or reports would make it meaningful, confirmable, disconfirmable, or distinct from alternative claims. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: A claim is too private, introspective, remote, microscopic, historical, or instrument-mediated for direct ordinary observation. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A claim is too private, introspective, remote, microscopic, historical, or instrument-mediated for direct ordinary observation.", "A claim refers to an object, property, state, or hidden entity, but the claim is not connected to any clear account of what experiences, observations, measurements, or reports would make it meaningful, confirmable, disconfirmable, or distinct from alternative claims."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "A claim is too private, introspective, remote, microscopic, historical, or instrument-mediated for direct ordinary observation."}, {"display_text": "A design, clinical, or investigative team needs to know what evidence would support or undermine a reported experience.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A claim refers to an object, property, state, or hidden entity, but the claim is not connected to any clear account of what experiences, observations, measurements, or reports would make it meaningful, confirmable, disconfirmable, or distinct from alternative claims. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: A design, clinical, or investigative team needs to know what evidence would support or undermine a reported experience. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A design, clinical, or investigative team needs to know what evidence would support or undermine a reported experience.", "A claim refers to an object, property, state, or hidden entity, but the claim is not connected to any clear account of what experiences, observations, measurements, or reports would make it meaningful, confirmable, disconfirmable, or distinct from alternative claims."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "A design, clinical, or investigative team needs to know what evidence would support or undermine a reported experience."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 61, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-061", "ledger_sha256": "f0837c8288ee28ba526915fd46b10f35b9d14794f466bd558993309d1da80e7e"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Sensitivity Analysis Protocol", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:sensitivity_analysis_protocol", "slug": "sensitivity_analysis_protocol"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 2 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 2}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is conditional confidence. A plan, model, forecast, ranking, or recommendation appears settled, but its conclusion may depend on uncertain inputs whose influence is hidden. This creates two bad options: either actors overtrust the baseline answer, or they reject the analysis wholesale because uncertainty is present.\n\nSensitivity analysis creates a middle path. It keeps the baseline explicit but treats it as conditional. The question becomes: under what plausible assumption changes does the conclusion remain stable, and under what changes does it fail?", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A model, analysis, plan, or decision recommendation looks settled, but its conclusion may depend heavily on uncertain assumptions whose influence has not been made visible."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime requires a model output or decision depending on parameters, weights, thresholds, or assumptions to be varied.", "role_mapping": "Forecast inputs -> parameters; conclusion -> output.", "slug": "sensitivity_analysis_in_operations_research", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b061_a10_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when a decision depends on forecasts, estimates, weights, thresholds, or assumptions that could plausibly be wrong. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A decision depends on forecasts, estimates, weights, thresholds, or uncertain causal assumptions.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A decision depends on forecasts, estimates, weights, thresholds, or uncertain causal assumptions.", "Use this archetype when a decision depends on forecasts, estimates, weights, thresholds, or assumptions that could plausibly be wrong."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Sensitivity Analysis (in Operations Research)", "one_liner": "Analyze impact of parameter variation.", "page_ref": "prime:sensitivity_analysis_in_operations_research", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Forecast inputs -> parameters; conclusion -> output.", "slug": "sensitivity_analysis_in_operations_research", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime requires a model output or decision depending on parameters, weights, thresholds, or assumptions to be varied."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A decision depends on forecasts, estimates, weights, thresholds, or uncertain causal assumptions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Sensitivity analysis can confirm that no plausible small change matters.", "slug": "sensitivity_analysis_in_operations_research"}], "residual_id": "r:sensitivity_analysis_protocol:b061_a10_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b061_a10_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A sensitivity protocol turns that disagreement into testable claims: which assumption, over what range, changes which outcome? The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Small changes in context could plausibly change the outcome, but no one knows which changes matter.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Small changes in context could plausibly change the outcome, but no one knows which changes matter.", "A sensitivity protocol turns that disagreement into testable claims: which assumption, over what range, changes which outcome?"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Sensitivity analysis can confirm that no plausible small change matters.", "slug": "sensitivity_analysis_in_operations_research"}], "normalized_requirement": "Small changes in context could plausibly change the outcome, but no one knows which changes matter.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Small changes in context could plausibly change the outcome, but no one knows which changes matter.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Stakeholders disagree about which assumptions are plausible or important.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The question becomes: under what plausible assumption changes does the conclusion remain stable, and under what changes does it fail? In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Stakeholders disagree about which assumptions are plausible or important. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders disagree about which assumptions are plausible or important.", "The question becomes: under what plausible assumption changes does the conclusion remain stable, and under what changes does it fail?"]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "Stakeholders disagree about which assumptions are plausible or important."}, {"display_text": "The model output is being used to justify a costly, risky, irreversible, or politically contested commitment.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is a strong fit when the decision is costly, risky, irreversible, politically contested, safety-relevant, or likely to become locked in. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The model output is being used to justify a costly, risky, irreversible, or politically contested commitment. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The model output is being used to justify a costly, risky, irreversible, or politically contested commitment.", "It is a strong fit when the decision is costly, risky, irreversible, politically contested, safety-relevant, or likely to become locked in."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "The model output is being used to justify a costly, risky, irreversible, or politically contested commitment."}, {"display_text": "A single best-estimate answer is being presented as more certain than the evidence warrants.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This creates two bad options: either actors overtrust the baseline answer, or they reject the analysis wholesale because uncertainty is present. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: A single best-estimate answer is being presented as more certain than the evidence warrants. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A single best-estimate answer is being presented as more certain than the evidence warrants.", "This creates two bad options: either actors overtrust the baseline answer, or they reject the analysis wholesale because uncertainty is present."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "A single best-estimate answer is being presented as more certain than the evidence warrants."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 61, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-061", "ledger_sha256": "f0837c8288ee28ba526915fd46b10f35b9d14794f466bd558993309d1da80e7e"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Sequential Contrast and Temporal Distinctiveness", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:sequential_contrast_and_temporal_distinctiveness", "slug": "sequential_contrast_and_temporal_distinctiveness"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is that contrast needs separation, but separation changes interpretation. Showing two things together may overload attention or make them interfere with one another. Showing them in sequence may make each state clearer, but it also creates primacy effects, recency effects, memory decay, fatigue, learning, context drift, and narrative steering.\n\nThe archetype resolves this by treating temporal order as a design variable rather than as neutral background chronology.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A comparison, explanation, test, or narrative needs the audience or analyst to perceive meaningful differences across states, but simultaneous presentation would cause confusion, interference, or overload. Simply placing the elements in sequence is not enough because the sequence can introduce order effects, memory decay, context drift, or misleading narrative emphasis."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime makes difference between elements the central relational object.", "role_mapping": "States or options -> compared elements; difference -> contrast.", "slug": "contrast", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b061_a11_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A comparison, explanation, test, or narrative needs the audience or analyst to perceive meaningful differences across states, but simultaneous presentation would cause confusion, interference, or overload. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The difference between states, options, phases, or narratives matters more than either element in isolation.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The difference between states, options, phases, or narratives matters more than either element in isolation.", "A comparison, explanation, test, or narrative needs the audience or analyst to perceive meaningful differences across states, but simultaneous presentation would cause confusion, interference, or overload."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Contrast", "one_liner": "Emphasized difference.", "page_ref": "prime:contrast", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "States or options -> compared elements; difference -> contrast.", "slug": "contrast", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime makes difference between elements the central relational object."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The difference between states, options, phases, or narratives matters more than either element in isolation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P098-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve multiple elements in simultaneous juxtaposition.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Two or more elements are presented side by side.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail juxtaposition as a cause of the perceptual effect.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The side-by-side juxtaposition produces an adverse perceptual effect.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when juxtaposition causes attention competition.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The elements compete for attention.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when juxtaposition collapses meaningful differences.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The differences between the elements are collapsed.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Side-by-side juxtaposition causes elements to compete for attention or causes their differences to collapse.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "side-by-side juxtaposition causes attention competition or collapsed difference", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P098-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Side-by-side contrast can sharpen rather than collapse difference.", "slug": "contrast"}], "residual_id": "r:sequential_contrast_and_temporal_distinctiveness:b061_a11_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b061_a11_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Temporal separation can make differences clearer, but the act of sequencing changes attention, memory, interpretation, and context. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Side-by-side juxtaposition makes the elements compete for attention or collapses their differences.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Side-by-side juxtaposition makes the elements compete for attention or collapses their differences.", "Temporal separation can make differences clearer, but the act of sequencing changes attention, memory, interpretation, and context."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Side-by-side contrast can sharpen rather than collapse difference.", "slug": "contrast"}], "normalized_requirement": "Side-by-side juxtaposition makes the elements compete for attention or collapses their differences.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Side-by-side juxtaposition makes the elements compete for attention or collapses their differences.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Contrast can be simultaneous and use neither element as a temporal baseline.", "slug": "contrast"}], "residual_id": "r:sequential_contrast_and_temporal_distinctiveness:b061_a11_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b061_a11_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A prior state, first condition, or opening frame can be captured well enough to serve as a reference. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A prior state, first condition, or opening frame can be captured well enough to serve as a reference."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Contrast can be simultaneous and use neither element as a temporal baseline.", "slug": "contrast"}], "normalized_requirement": "A prior state, first condition, or opening frame can be captured well enough to serve as a reference.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A prior state, first condition, or opening frame can be captured well enough to serve as a reference.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P098-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve an ordered sequence in which temporal position can matter.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An ordered experience or representation contains two or more temporal positions.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail that order itself carries content rather than merely arranging order-invariant content.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Temporal order contributes constitutively to what the sequence carries.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when order contributes to meaning.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Temporal order is part of the meaning.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when order contributes to evidence.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Temporal order is part of the evidence.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when order contributes to user experience.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Temporal order is part of the user experience.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Temporal order is itself part of the meaning, evidence, or user experience.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "temporal order itself carries semantic evidential or experiential content", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P098-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A contrast can be order-invariant.", "slug": "contrast"}], "residual_id": "r:sequential_contrast_and_temporal_distinctiveness:b061_a11_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b061_a11_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The archetype resolves this by treating temporal order as a design variable rather than as neutral background chronology. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Temporal order is itself part of the meaning, evidence, or user experience.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Temporal order is itself part of the meaning, evidence, or user experience.", "The archetype resolves this by treating temporal order as a design variable rather than as neutral background chronology."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Could sequential_clarity remain complete if the mapped temporal position were freely changed without changing the retained branch outcome? No; its exact definition makes that position, precedence, or later update load-bearing.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Sequential Clarity", "one_liner": "Judge how well each item in an ordered presentation stands out not by its own quality but by how much it contrasts with its immediate temporal neighbours inside the working-memory window.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:sequential_clarity", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "sequential_clarity"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "sequential_clarity", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P098-C07-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent exact-record review confirms universal entailment of one complete DNF branch. No qualifier, favorable subtype, or solution-trigger substitution is used."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Could temporal_distinctiveness remain complete if the mapped temporal position were freely changed without changing the retained branch outcome? No; its exact definition makes that position, precedence, or later update load-bearing.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Temporal Distinctiveness", "one_liner": "Predict an item's recallability not from its absolute age but from how isolated it is among its neighbours in a log-compressed, retrieval-end view of the past, governed by the ratio of the retention interval to the inter-item interval.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:temporal_distinctiveness", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "temporal_distinctiveness"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "temporal_distinctiveness", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P098-C07-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent exact-record review confirms universal entailment of one complete DNF branch. No qualifier, favorable subtype, or solution-trigger substitution is used."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Could script_activation remain complete if the mapped temporal position were freely changed without changing the retained branch outcome? No; its exact definition makes that position, precedence, or later update load-bearing.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Script Activation", "one_liner": "Trigger, from a single environmental or linguistic cue, the loading of a stored ordered event sequence with role and prop slots and default fillers, which then gap-fills comprehension, pre-allocates processing, and scaffolds action at once.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:script_activation", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "script_activation"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "script_activation", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P098-C07-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent exact-record review confirms universal entailment of one complete DNF branch. No qualifier, favorable subtype, or solution-trigger substitution is used."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Could recency_effect remain complete if the mapped temporal position were freely changed without changing the retained branch outcome? No; its exact definition makes that position, precedence, or later update load-bearing.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Recency Effect", "one_liner": "The empirical finding that the last items in a temporal sequence are recalled or weighted more heavily than middle items, driven by a short-term-store component and a temporal-distinctiveness component that a filled delay can separate.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:recency_effect", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "recency_effect"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "recency_effect", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P098-C07-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent exact-record review confirms universal entailment of one complete DNF branch. No qualifier, favorable subtype, or solution-trigger substitution is used."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Could setup_and_payoff remain complete if the mapped temporal position were freely changed without changing the retained branch outcome? No; its exact definition makes that position, precedence, or later update load-bearing.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Setup and Payoff", "one_liner": "Place material early that a later development activates, so the payoff feels earned and the setup gains retrospective necessity; the relation requires both precedence and a relevant return.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:setup_and_payoff", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "setup_and_payoff"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "setup_and_payoff", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P098-C07-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent exact-record review confirms universal entailment of one complete DNF branch. No qualifier, favorable subtype, or solution-trigger substitution is used."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Could serial_position_effect remain complete if the mapped temporal position were freely changed without changing the retained branch outcome? No; its exact definition makes that position, precedence, or later update load-bearing.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Serial-Position Effect", "one_liner": "The memory phenomenon in which items in a sequence are recalled in a U-shaped curve — high for the beginning (primacy, from extra rehearsal) and end (recency, from the transient buffer), sagging in the middle — with the two limbs mechanistically dissociable.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:serial_position_effect", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "serial_position_effect"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "serial_position_effect", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P098-C07-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent exact-record review confirms universal entailment of one complete DNF branch. No qualifier, favorable subtype, or solution-trigger substitution is used."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Could primacy_effect remain complete if the mapped temporal position were freely changed without changing the retained branch outcome? No; its exact definition makes that position, precedence, or later update load-bearing.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Primacy Effect", "one_liner": "Items at the beginning of a sequence are remembered and weighted disproportionately, through two converging mechanisms — extra rehearsal cycles in serial recall and interpretive frame-setting in impression formation — so that the same content in different orders yields different beliefs.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:primacy_effect", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "primacy_effect"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "primacy_effect", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P098-C07-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent exact-record review confirms universal entailment of one complete DNF branch. No qualifier, favorable subtype, or solution-trigger substitution is used."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Could foreshadowing_cue remain complete if the mapped temporal position were freely changed without changing the retained branch outcome? No; its exact definition makes that position, precedence, or later update load-bearing.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Foreshadowing Cue", "one_liner": "Plant an unobtrusive early detail whose meaning stays underdetermined across a gap, then let a later pay-off retroactively convert it into something load-bearing — the 'ah, of course' recognition.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:foreshadowing_cue", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "foreshadowing_cue"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "foreshadowing_cue", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P098-C07-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent exact-record review confirms universal entailment of one complete DNF branch. No qualifier, favorable subtype, or solution-trigger substitution is used."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Could plot remain complete if the mapped temporal position were freely changed without changing the retained branch outcome? No; its exact definition makes that position, precedence, or later update load-bearing.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Plot", "one_liner": "Distinguish the causally bound, tension-shaped arrangement of selected events into a rising-climax-resolution arc from the mere chronicle of what happened in sequence — the move from 'and then' to 'because of' — and hold the underlying story fixed while varying its telling.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:plot", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "plot"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "plot", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P098-C07-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent exact-record review confirms universal entailment of one complete DNF branch. No qualifier, favorable subtype, or solution-trigger substitution is used."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Could hindsight_bias remain complete if the mapped temporal position were freely changed without changing the retained branch outcome? No; its exact definition makes that position, precedence, or later update load-bearing.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Hindsight Bias", "one_liner": "The tendency, once an outcome is known, to inflate its perceived prior probability and misremember one's own judgment as closer to it than it was, because outcome knowledge is folded into the memory of the prior situation and reconstructs rather than retrieves it.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:hindsight_bias", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "hindsight_bias"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "hindsight_bias", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P098-C07-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent exact-record review confirms universal entailment of one complete DNF branch. No qualifier, favorable subtype, or solution-trigger substitution is used."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Could anagnorisis remain complete if the mapped temporal position were freely changed without changing the retained branch outcome? No; its exact definition makes that position, precedence, or later update load-bearing.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Anagnorisis", "one_liner": "Aristotle's moment of dramatic recognition — a character's discrete move from ignorance to knowledge of a load-bearing fact about identity or agency that retroactively reorganizes the meaning of every prior scene rather than adding a new event.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:anagnorisis", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "anagnorisis"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "anagnorisis", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P098-C07-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent exact-record review confirms universal entailment of one complete DNF branch. No qualifier, favorable subtype, or solution-trigger substitution is used."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Could focus_order_failure remain complete if the mapped temporal position were freely changed without changing the retained branch outcome? No; its exact definition makes that position, precedence, or later update load-bearing.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Focus-Order Failure", "one_liner": "The accessibility defect in which an interface advances programmatic focus (Tab navigation, screen-reader linearization) in a sequence that diverges from the task's semantic order — invisible to visual review, and sometimes placing a confirmation control before the content it confirms.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:focus_order_failure", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "focus_order_failure"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "focus_order_failure", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P098-C07-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent exact-record review confirms universal entailment of one complete DNF branch. No qualifier, favorable subtype, or solution-trigger substitution is used."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Temporal order is itself part of the meaning, evidence, or user experience.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The design must distinguish real change from artifacts of measurement window, recall, primacy, recency, learning, fatigue, or context drift.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Showing them in sequence may make each state clearer, but it also creates primacy effects, recency effects, memory decay, fatigue, learning, context drift, and narrative steering. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: The design must distinguish real change from artifacts of measurement window, recall, primacy, recency, learning, fatigue, or context drift. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The design must distinguish real change from artifacts of measurement window, recall, primacy, recency, learning, fatigue, or context drift.", "Showing them in sequence may make each state clearer, but it also creates primacy effects, recency effects, memory decay, fatigue, learning, context drift, and narrative steering."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The design must distinguish real change from artifacts of measurement window, recall, primacy, recency, learning, fatigue, or context drift."}, {"display_text": "The audience needs enough separation to experience each state distinctly before interpreting the comparison.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A comparison, explanation, test, or narrative needs the audience or analyst to perceive meaningful differences across states, but simultaneous presentation would cause confusion, interference, or overload. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: The audience needs enough separation to experience each state distinctly before interpreting the comparison. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The audience needs enough separation to experience each state distinctly before interpreting the comparison.", "A comparison, explanation, test, or narrative needs the audience or analyst to perceive meaningful differences across states, but simultaneous presentation would cause confusion, interference, or overload."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The audience needs enough separation to experience each state distinctly before interpreting the comparison."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 61, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-061", "ledger_sha256": "f0837c8288ee28ba526915fd46b10f35b9d14794f466bd558993309d1da80e7e"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Sequential Local Superiority", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:sequential_local_superiority", "slug": "sequential_local_superiority"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 5, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A globally stronger but distributed opponent, backlog, risk set, dependency field, or coalition can overwhelm the focal actor if engaged as a whole, yet its parts are separated enough that local superiority can be created if the actor sequences attention and prevents recombination.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A globally stronger but distributed opponent, backlog, risk set, dependency field, or coalition can overwhelm the focal actor if engaged as a whole, yet its parts are separated enough that local superiority can be created if the actor sequences attention and prevents recombination."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime requires a globally weaker actor unable to confront the combined opposition.", "role_mapping": "Focal actor -> concentrated force; all fronts -> stronger aggregate opposition.", "slug": "defeat_in_detail", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b061_a12_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A globally stronger but distributed opponent, backlog, risk set, dependency field, or coalition can overwhelm the focal actor if engaged as a whole, yet its parts are separated enough that local superiority can be created if the actor sequences attention and prevents recombination. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The focal actor is globally weaker, resource-constrained, or unable to cover all fronts simultaneously.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The focal actor is globally weaker, resource-constrained, or unable to cover all fronts simultaneously.", "A globally stronger but distributed opponent, backlog, risk set, dependency field, or coalition can overwhelm the focal actor if engaged as a whole, yet its parts are separated enough that local superiority can be created if the actor sequences attention and prevents recombination."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Defeat In Detail", "one_liner": "A globally weaker attacker beats a globally stronger but distributed adversary by achieving local superiority and engaging the parts sequentially before they can combine.", "page_ref": "prime:defeat_in_detail", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Focal actor -> concentrated force; all fronts -> stronger aggregate opposition.", "slug": "defeat_in_detail", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime requires a globally weaker actor unable to confront the combined opposition."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The focal actor is globally weaker, resource-constrained, or unable to cover all fronts simultaneously.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The opposition must be separable into units or fronts that can be engaged independently.", "role_mapping": "Distributed field -> opponent units.", "slug": "defeat_in_detail", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b061_a12_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A globally stronger but distributed opponent, backlog, risk set, dependency field, or coalition can overwhelm the focal actor if engaged as a whole, yet its parts are separated enough that local superiority can be created if the actor sequences attention and prevents recombination. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The opposing field is distributed into separable units, fronts, claims, incidents, work clusters, or stakeholder blocs.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The opposing field is distributed into separable units, fronts, claims, incidents, work clusters, or stakeholder blocs.", "A globally stronger but distributed opponent, backlog, risk set, dependency field, or coalition can overwhelm the focal actor if engaged as a whole, yet its parts are separated enough that local superiority can be created if the actor sequences attention and prevents recombination."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Defeat In Detail", "one_liner": "A globally weaker attacker beats a globally stronger but distributed adversary by achieving local superiority and engaging the parts sequentially before they can combine.", "page_ref": "prime:defeat_in_detail", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Distributed field -> opponent units.", "slug": "defeat_in_detail", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The opposition must be separable into units or fronts that can be engaged independently."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The opposing field is distributed into separable units, fronts, claims, incidents, work clusters, or stakeholder blocs.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Friction or delay prevents opponent units from instantly recombining or reinforcing.", "role_mapping": "Recombination delay -> separation window.", "slug": "defeat_in_detail", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b061_a12_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Those units cannot instantly combine, reinforce, synchronize, litigate, mobilize, or regenerate without delay or friction. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Those units cannot instantly combine, reinforce, synchronize, litigate, mobilize, or regenerate without delay or friction."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Defeat In Detail", "one_liner": "A globally weaker attacker beats a globally stronger but distributed adversary by achieving local superiority and engaging the parts sequentially before they can combine.", "page_ref": "prime:defeat_in_detail", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Recombination delay -> separation window.", "slug": "defeat_in_detail", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Friction or delay prevents opponent units from instantly recombining or reinforcing."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Those units cannot instantly combine, reinforce, synchronize, litigate, mobilize, or regenerate without delay or friction.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The actor concentrates limited capacity to create superiority at one local contest.", "role_mapping": "Concentration -> local force ratio; timing -> engagement choice.", "slug": "defeat_in_detail", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b061_a12_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A globally stronger but distributed opponent, backlog, risk set, dependency field, or coalition can overwhelm the focal actor if engaged as a whole, yet its parts are separated enough that local superiority can be created if the actor sequences attention and prevents recombination. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Local superiority can be created through concentration, specialization, timing, information, legitimacy, or focus.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Local superiority can be created through concentration, specialization, timing, information, legitimacy, or focus.", "A globally stronger but distributed opponent, backlog, risk set, dependency field, or coalition can overwhelm the focal actor if engaged as a whole, yet its parts are separated enough that local superiority can be created if the actor sequences attention and prevents recombination."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Defeat In Detail", "one_liner": "A globally weaker attacker beats a globally stronger but distributed adversary by achieving local superiority and engaging the parts sequentially before they can combine.", "page_ref": "prime:defeat_in_detail", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Concentration -> local force ratio; timing -> engagement choice.", "slug": "defeat_in_detail", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The actor concentrates limited capacity to create superiority at one local contest."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Local superiority can be created through concentration, specialization, timing, information, legitimacy, or focus.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Resolving one unit releases capacity and weakens the remaining aggregate before the next engagement.", "role_mapping": "Resolved segment -> released resources; next step -> sequential advantage.", "slug": "defeat_in_detail", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b061_a12_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Resolution of one segment materially improves the next step by releasing capacity, reducing threat surface, creating credibility, or weakening coordination among remaining segments. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Resolution of one segment materially improves the next step by releasing capacity, reducing threat surface, creating credibility, or weakening coordination among remaining segments."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Defeat In Detail", "one_liner": "A globally weaker attacker beats a globally stronger but distributed adversary by achieving local superiority and engaging the parts sequentially before they can combine.", "page_ref": "prime:defeat_in_detail", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Resolved segment -> released resources; next step -> sequential advantage.", "slug": "defeat_in_detail", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Resolving one unit releases capacity and weakens the remaining aggregate before the next engagement."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Resolution of one segment materially improves the next step by releasing capacity, reducing threat surface, creating credibility, or weakening coordination among remaining segments.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "There is a feasible way to monitor recombination, escalation, spillover, or regeneration during the sequence.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A globally stronger but distributed opponent, backlog, risk set, dependency field, or coalition can overwhelm the focal actor if engaged as a whole, yet its parts are separated enough that local superiority can be created if the actor sequences attention and prevents recombination. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: There is a feasible way to monitor recombination, escalation, spillover, or regeneration during the sequence. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["There is a feasible way to monitor recombination, escalation, spillover, or regeneration during the sequence.", "A globally stronger but distributed opponent, backlog, risk set, dependency field, or coalition can overwhelm the focal actor if engaged as a whole, yet its parts are separated enough that local superiority can be created if the actor sequences attention and prevents recombination."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "There is a feasible way to monitor recombination, escalation, spillover, or regeneration during the sequence."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 61, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-061", "ledger_sha256": "f0837c8288ee28ba526915fd46b10f35b9d14794f466bd558993309d1da80e7e"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Sequential Policy Optimization", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:sequential_policy_optimization", "slug": "sequential_policy_optimization"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 6, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 6, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "6 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is myopic repeated decision-making. A system acts again and again, but each action is judged by immediate appeal or local metrics. The action may change future states, yet those future states are not represented in the decision logic. The result can be inconsistent action, delayed harm, reactive revision, and policies that appear reasonable one step at a time while performing poorly over a trajectory.\n\nThis pattern also appears when a sophisticated model exists but the policy structure is not governed. A simulator, MDP, or reinforcement-learning model may produce actions, but stakeholders may not know which states matter, how transitions were inferred, what the reward function values, what constraints are non-negotiable, or when the policy should be revised.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system makes repeated decisions where each action changes future states, available options, probabilities, costs, benefits, or risks, but actors select actions one-at-a-time using local intuition, static rules, or short-horizon metrics."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime requires repeated state-conditioned decisions over stages.", "role_mapping": "Recurring decision -> action choice; states -> MDP state space.", "slug": "markov_decision_processes_mdps", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b061_a13_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when decisions recur, the system has meaningful state changes, and the consequences of an action unfold over time. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The same type of decision recurs over multiple states or stages.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The same type of decision recurs over multiple states or stages.", "Use this archetype when decisions recur, the system has meaningful state changes, and the consequences of an action unfold over time."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Markov Decision Processes (MDPs)", "one_liner": "Sequential decision-making under uncertainty.", "page_ref": "prime:markov_decision_processes_mdps", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Recurring decision -> action choice; states -> MDP state space.", "slug": "markov_decision_processes_mdps", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime requires repeated state-conditioned decisions over stages."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The same type of decision recurs over multiple states or stages.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Actions determine probability distributions over successor states and option sets.", "role_mapping": "Current action -> transition kernel; future state -> successor.", "slug": "markov_decision_processes_mdps", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b061_a13_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The action may change future states, yet those future states are not represented in the decision logic. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Current actions alter future state probabilities or option sets.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Current actions alter future state probabilities or option sets.", "The action may change future states, yet those future states are not represented in the decision logic."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Markov Decision Processes (MDPs)", "one_liner": "Sequential decision-making under uncertainty.", "page_ref": "prime:markov_decision_processes_mdps", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Current action -> transition kernel; future state -> successor.", "slug": "markov_decision_processes_mdps", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Actions determine probability distributions over successor states and option sets."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Current actions alter future state probabilities or option sets.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The objective aggregates delayed rewards and costs across a trajectory.", "role_mapping": "Delayed outcome -> reward stream; horizon -> cumulative return.", "slug": "markov_decision_processes_mdps", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b061_a13_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Outcomes depend on delayed rewards, costs, harms, or avoided losses. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Outcomes depend on delayed rewards, costs, harms, or avoided losses."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Markov Decision Processes (MDPs)", "one_liner": "Sequential decision-making under uncertainty.", "page_ref": "prime:markov_decision_processes_mdps", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Delayed outcome -> reward stream; horizon -> cumulative return.", "slug": "markov_decision_processes_mdps", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The objective aggregates delayed rewards and costs across a trajectory."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Outcomes depend on delayed rewards, costs, harms, or avoided losses.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Material uncertainty is represented by stochastic transitions or outcomes.", "role_mapping": "Uncertainty -> transition probabilities.", "slug": "markov_decision_processes_mdps", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b061_a13_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Uncertainty about transitions or outcomes is material. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Uncertainty about transitions or outcomes is material."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Markov Decision Processes (MDPs)", "one_liner": "Sequential decision-making under uncertainty.", "page_ref": "prime:markov_decision_processes_mdps", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Uncertainty -> transition probabilities.", "slug": "markov_decision_processes_mdps", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Material uncertainty is represented by stochastic transitions or outcomes."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Uncertainty about transitions or outcomes is material.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The solution object is a policy mapping many observed states to actions, not one bespoke choice.", "role_mapping": "Durable rule -> policy; cases -> states.", "slug": "markov_decision_processes_mdps", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b061_a13_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The archetype is less useful for one-shot decisions, static allocations, or cases where repeated actions are independent. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A durable rule or policy must guide many cases, not merely one bespoke decision.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A durable rule or policy must guide many cases, not merely one bespoke decision.", "The archetype is less useful for one-shot decisions, static allocations, or cases where repeated actions are independent."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Markov Decision Processes (MDPs)", "one_liner": "Sequential decision-making under uncertainty.", "page_ref": "prime:markov_decision_processes_mdps", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Durable rule -> policy; cases -> states.", "slug": "markov_decision_processes_mdps", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The solution object is a policy mapping many observed states to actions, not one bespoke choice."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A durable rule or policy must guide many cases, not merely one bespoke decision.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "State observability sufficient for conditional action is a defining assumption.", "role_mapping": "Signals -> observed state; conditional action -> policy.", "slug": "markov_decision_processes_mdps", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b061_a13_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The action may change future states, yet those future states are not represented in the decision logic. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The system can observe state signals well enough to condition action on state.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The system can observe state signals well enough to condition action on state.", "The action may change future states, yet those future states are not represented in the decision logic."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Markov Decision Processes (MDPs)", "one_liner": "Sequential decision-making under uncertainty.", "page_ref": "prime:markov_decision_processes_mdps", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Signals -> observed state; conditional action -> policy.", "slug": "markov_decision_processes_mdps", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "State observability sufficient for conditional action is a defining assumption."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The system can observe state signals well enough to condition action on state.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 61, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-061", "ledger_sha256": "f0837c8288ee28ba526915fd46b10f35b9d14794f466bd558993309d1da80e7e"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Sequential Stopping Boundary Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:sequential_stopping_boundary_design", "slug": "sequential_stopping_boundary_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 5, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A decision unfolds as a sequence of observations. Each additional observation may improve selection or reduce uncertainty, but waiting also consumes resources and may forfeit opportunities. Without a stopping boundary, actors either commit too early to a merely acceptable option, keep searching after the expected gain is too small, allow sunk-cost and optimism pressures to extend the process, or use ad hoc social pressure as the halt condition. The problem is not only whether to stop; it is how to define a halt decision that remains coherent as evidence arrives, the horizon shortens, and the cost of early versus late commitment changes.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A decision unfolds as a sequence of observations. Each additional observation may improve selection or reduce uncertainty, but waiting also consumes resources and may forfeit opportunities. Without a stopping boundary, actors either commit too early to a merely acceptable option, keep searching after the expected gain is too small, allow sunk-cost and optimism pressures to extend the process, or use ad hoc social pressure as the halt condition. The problem is not only whether to stop; it is how to define a halt decision that remains coherent as evidence arrives, the horizon shortens, and the cost of early versus late commitment changes."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime requires sequentially arriving observations or offers and a choice of when to stop.", "role_mapping": "Arrivals -> observations; stop -> accept or halt.", "slug": "optimal_stopping_rule", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b061_a14_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A decision unfolds as a sequence of observations. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A decision has a sequential observation structure: candidates, bids, experiments, measurements, offers, states, warnings, or opportunities arrive over time.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A decision has a sequential observation structure: candidates, bids, experiments, measurements, offers, states, warnings, or opportunities arrive over time.", "A decision unfolds as a sequence of observations."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Optimal Stopping Rule", "one_liner": "A rule maps a sequence of observations to a halt decision, trading the cost of stopping too early against stopping too late.", "page_ref": "prime:optimal_stopping_rule", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Arrivals -> observations; stop -> accept or halt.", "slug": "optimal_stopping_rule", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime requires sequentially arriving observations or offers and a choice of when to stop."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A decision has a sequential observation structure: candidates, bids, experiments, measurements, offers, states, warnings, or opportunities arrive over time.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Continuation buys information but consumes time, opportunity, or risk budget.", "role_mapping": "Continue -> sample; cost -> delay or risk.", "slug": "optimal_stopping_rule", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b061_a14_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The archetype manages the tension between information gain and commitment cost. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The actor can continue sampling, waiting, testing, searching, or delaying commitment, but continuation has real cost or risk.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The actor can continue sampling, waiting, testing, searching, or delaying commitment, but continuation has real cost or risk.", "The archetype manages the tension between information gain and commitment cost."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Optimal Stopping Rule", "one_liner": "A rule maps a sequence of observations to a halt decision, trading the cost of stopping too early against stopping too late.", "page_ref": "prime:optimal_stopping_rule", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Continue -> sample; cost -> delay or risk.", "slug": "optimal_stopping_rule", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Continuation buys information but consumes time, opportunity, or risk budget."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The actor can continue sampling, waiting, testing, searching, or delaying commitment, but continuation has real cost or risk.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Irrevocable or decaying opportunities create the payoff consequence of waiting.", "role_mapping": "Accept opportunity -> stop payoff; expiry -> horizon loss.", "slug": "optimal_stopping_rule", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b061_a14_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Without a stopping boundary, actors either commit too early to a merely acceptable option, keep searching after the expected gain is too small, allow sunk-cost and optimism pressures to extend the process, or use ad hoc social pressure as the halt condition. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The opportunity to accept, halt, buy, sell, intervene, publish, hire, deploy, abandon, or exercise an option may become unavailable or less valuable over time.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The opportunity to accept, halt, buy, sell, intervene, publish, hire, deploy, abandon, or exercise an option may become unavailable or less valuable over time.", "Without a stopping boundary, actors either commit too early to a merely acceptable option, keep searching after the expected gain is too small, allow sunk-cost and optimism pressures to extend the process, or use ad hoc social pressure as the halt condition."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Optimal Stopping Rule", "one_liner": "A rule maps a sequence of observations to a halt decision, trading the cost of stopping too early against stopping too late.", "page_ref": "prime:optimal_stopping_rule", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Accept opportunity -> stop payoff; expiry -> horizon loss.", "slug": "optimal_stopping_rule", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Irrevocable or decaying opportunities create the payoff consequence of waiting."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The opportunity to accept, halt, buy, sell, intervene, publish, hire, deploy, abandon, or exercise an option may become unavailable or less valuable over time.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The rule balances asymmetric premature and delayed stopping costs rather than a fixed deadline alone.", "role_mapping": "Early cost -> insufficient information; late cost -> lost option.", "slug": "optimal_stopping_rule", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b061_a14_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The problem is not only whether to stop; it is how to define a halt decision that remains coherent as evidence arrives, the horizon shortens, and the cost of early versus late commitment changes. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Stopping too early and stopping too late have asymmetric costs, and those costs are not captured by a simple deadline.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Stopping too early and stopping too late have asymmetric costs, and those costs are not captured by a simple deadline.", "The problem is not only whether to stop; it is how to define a halt decision that remains coherent as evidence arrives, the horizon shortens, and the cost of early versus late commitment changes."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Optimal Stopping Rule", "one_liner": "A rule maps a sequence of observations to a halt decision, trading the cost of stopping too early against stopping too late.", "page_ref": "prime:optimal_stopping_rule", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Early cost -> insufficient information; late cost -> lost option.", "slug": "optimal_stopping_rule", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The rule balances asymmetric premature and delayed stopping costs rather than a fixed deadline alone."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Stopping too early and stopping too late have asymmetric costs, and those costs are not captured by a simple deadline.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Horizon, remaining samples, distribution, and reversibility determine the stopping boundary.", "role_mapping": "Decision horizon -> boundary parameter; evidence -> state.", "slug": "optimal_stopping_rule", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b061_a14_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The problem is not only whether to stop; it is how to define a halt decision that remains coherent as evidence arrives, the horizon shortens, and the cost of early versus late commitment changes. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The decision horizon, remaining sample size, distributional assumptions, or reversibility window affects what counts as enough evidence.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The decision horizon, remaining sample size, distributional assumptions, or reversibility window affects what counts as enough evidence.", "The problem is not only whether to stop; it is how to define a halt decision that remains coherent as evidence arrives, the horizon shortens, and the cost of early versus late commitment changes."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Optimal Stopping Rule", "one_liner": "A rule maps a sequence of observations to a halt decision, trading the cost of stopping too early against stopping too late.", "page_ref": "prime:optimal_stopping_rule", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Decision horizon -> boundary parameter; evidence -> state.", "slug": "optimal_stopping_rule", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Horizon, remaining samples, distribution, and reversibility determine the stopping boundary."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The decision horizon, remaining sample size, distributional assumptions, or reversibility window affects what counts as enough evidence.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Participants disagree because some value information quality while others value speed, capacity, safety, or option preservation.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Participants disagree because some value information quality while others value speed, capacity, safety, or option preservation. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Participants disagree because some value information quality while others value speed, capacity, safety, or option preservation."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Participants disagree because some value information quality while others value speed, capacity, safety, or option preservation."}, {"display_text": "Past continuation decisions become psychologically sticky, creating escalation-of-commitment risk.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The problem is not only whether to stop; it is how to define a halt decision that remains coherent as evidence arrives, the horizon shortens, and the cost of early versus late commitment changes. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Past continuation decisions become psychologically sticky, creating escalation-of-commitment risk. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Past continuation decisions become psychologically sticky, creating escalation-of-commitment risk.", "The problem is not only whether to stop; it is how to define a halt decision that remains coherent as evidence arrives, the horizon shortens, and the cost of early versus late commitment changes."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "Past continuation decisions become psychologically sticky, creating escalation-of-commitment risk."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 61, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-061", "ledger_sha256": "f0837c8288ee28ba526915fd46b10f35b9d14794f466bd558993309d1da80e7e"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Sequestration Containment", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:sequestration_containment", "slug": "sequestration_containment"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 5, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is unsafe or destabilizing circulation. A target remains connected to ordinary pathways even though those pathways now create disproportionate risk. In physical systems, the pathway may be exposure, leakage, contamination, or use. In digital systems, it may be execution, replication, access, or downstream pipeline inclusion. In legal or financial systems, it may be unilateral control, tampering, dispute, or premature transfer.\n\nThe recurring failure is treating recognition as containment: a label, warning, memo, or flag is added, but the target still moves through the same channels. Sequestration Containment requires a real state change. The target must be moved into a condition where ordinary circulation no longer applies.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A substance, resource, actor, artifact, capability, signal, or asset is dangerous, destabilizing, scarce, sensitive, or vulnerable while it remains in ordinary circulation, and ordinary access paths cannot be trusted to prevent harm, leakage, depletion, tampering, or premature use."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime removes a harmful, volatile, or sensitive target from active circulation.", "role_mapping": "Target -> sequestered object; ordinary contact -> exposure route.", "slug": "sequestration", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b061_a15_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The system benefits from circulation, access, and use, but the specific target creates disproportionate harm, volatility, leakage, or integrity risk when it remains freely available. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The target can cause harm, contamination, volatility, exploitation, or irreversible damage through ordinary contact or use.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The target can cause harm, contamination, volatility, exploitation, or irreversible damage through ordinary contact or use.", "The system benefits from circulation, access, and use, but the specific target creates disproportionate harm, volatility, leakage, or integrity risk when it remains freely available."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Sequestration", "one_liner": "Deliberately removes a resource, hazard, or information from active circulation and keeps it behind a maintained boundary for persistent isolation.", "page_ref": "prime:sequestration", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Target -> sequestered object; ordinary contact -> exposure route.", "slug": "sequestration", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime removes a harmful, volatile, or sensitive target from active circulation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The target can cause harm, contamination, volatility, exploitation, or irreversible damage through ordinary contact or use.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Sequestration preserves the target for investigation, neutralization, repair, or later release rather than destroying it.", "role_mapping": "Hold -> preserved custody; later disposition -> release path.", "slug": "sequestration", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b061_a15_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when something should not remain in ordinary circulation but should also not simply be ignored or immediately destroyed. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The target must be preserved, investigated, neutralized, repaired, or released later rather than immediately destroyed or ignored.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The target must be preserved, investigated, neutralized, repaired, or released later rather than immediately destroyed or ignored.", "Use this archetype when something should not remain in ordinary circulation but should also not simply be ignored or immediately destroyed."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Sequestration", "one_liner": "Deliberately removes a resource, hazard, or information from active circulation and keeps it behind a maintained boundary for persistent isolation.", "page_ref": "prime:sequestration", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Hold -> preserved custody; later disposition -> release path.", "slug": "sequestration", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Sequestration preserves the target for investigation, neutralization, repair, or later release rather than destroying it."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The target must be preserved, investigated, neutralized, repaired, or released later rather than immediately destroyed or ignored.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The governed boundary compensates for users' inability to distinguish safe from unsafe contact.", "role_mapping": "Users -> outside actors; unsafe contact -> access risk.", "slug": "sequestration", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b061_a15_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is appropriate when the system needs time to inspect, preserve, remediate, adjudicate, or stabilize the target while preventing unsafe contact or unauthorized use. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Ordinary users, channels, markets, teams, or interfaces cannot reliably distinguish safe from unsafe contact.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Ordinary users, channels, markets, teams, or interfaces cannot reliably distinguish safe from unsafe contact.", "It is appropriate when the system needs time to inspect, preserve, remediate, adjudicate, or stabilize the target while preventing unsafe contact or unauthorized use."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Sequestration", "one_liner": "Deliberately removes a resource, hazard, or information from active circulation and keeps it behind a maintained boundary for persistent isolation.", "page_ref": "prime:sequestration", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Users -> outside actors; unsafe contact -> access risk.", "slug": "sequestration", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The governed boundary compensates for users' inability to distinguish safe from unsafe contact."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Ordinary users, channels, markets, teams, or interfaces cannot reliably distinguish safe from unsafe contact.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Uncontrolled access threatens safety, trust, integrity, or stability and therefore must be blocked.", "role_mapping": "Access -> boundary crossing; harm -> containment rationale.", "slug": "sequestration", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b061_a15_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The system benefits from circulation, access, and use, but the specific target creates disproportionate harm, volatility, leakage, or integrity risk when it remains freely available. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Uncontrolled access would undermine trust, evidentiary integrity, fairness, safety, or system stability.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Uncontrolled access would undermine trust, evidentiary integrity, fairness, safety, or system stability.", "The system benefits from circulation, access, and use, but the specific target creates disproportionate harm, volatility, leakage, or integrity risk when it remains freely available."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Sequestration", "one_liner": "Deliberately removes a resource, hazard, or information from active circulation and keeps it behind a maintained boundary for persistent isolation.", "page_ref": "prime:sequestration", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Access -> boundary crossing; harm -> containment rationale.", "slug": "sequestration", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Uncontrolled access threatens safety, trust, integrity, or stability and therefore must be blocked."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Uncontrolled access would undermine trust, evidentiary integrity, fairness, safety, or system stability.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Premature release can recreate the original exposure and is governed by explicit release justification.", "role_mapping": "Premature release -> boundary failure; recurrence -> original harm.", "slug": "sequestration", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b061_a15_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A substance, resource, actor, artifact, capability, signal, or asset is dangerous, destabilizing, scarce, sensitive, or vulnerable while it remains in ordinary circulation, and ordinary access paths cannot be trusted to prevent harm, leakage, depletion, tampering, or premature use. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Premature release could recreate the original harm or trigger a worse downstream cascade.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Premature release could recreate the original harm or trigger a worse downstream cascade.", "A substance, resource, actor, artifact, capability, signal, or asset is dangerous, destabilizing, scarce, sensitive, or vulnerable while it remains in ordinary circulation, and ordinary access paths cannot be trusted to prevent harm, leakage, depletion, tampering, or premature use."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Sequestration", "one_liner": "Deliberately removes a resource, hazard, or information from active circulation and keeps it behind a maintained boundary for persistent isolation.", "page_ref": "prime:sequestration", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Premature release -> boundary failure; recurrence -> original harm.", "slug": "sequestration", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Premature release can recreate the original exposure and is governed by explicit release justification."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Premature release could recreate the original harm or trigger a worse downstream cascade.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 61, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-061", "ledger_sha256": "f0837c8288ee28ba526915fd46b10f35b9d14794f466bd558993309d1da80e7e"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Service Rate Matching", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:service_rate_matching", "slug": "service_rate_matching"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A queue becomes unstable when effective arrivals exceed effective service rate over the relevant period. That does not require anyone to be lazy or the queue to be badly ordered. A support team may work constantly and still fall behind after a product launch; a permit office may process diligently and still accumulate applications before a deadline; a cloud job queue may operate correctly and still age messages because worker count is below arrival pressure.\n\nThe structural problem is a mismatch between the rhythm of demand and the rhythm of service. If the mismatch is not made explicit, the system often compensates through hidden delay, heroic overtime, rushed service, abandoned work, informal prioritization, or chronic backlog.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A waiting system accumulates backlog because the effective service rate is below the arrival rate over the relevant time interval, causing delay, age buildup, service-level breach, or unstable queue growth even if the queue structure itself is otherwise well defined."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Queueing requires work to arrive faster than it can be served at least over some interval.", "role_mapping": "Arrivals -> demand; limited service -> capacity.", "slug": "queueing", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b062_a01_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A queue becomes unstable when effective arrivals exceed effective service rate over the relevant period. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: new work, requests, cases, customers, messages, or tasks arrive at a rate that periodically or persistently exceeds service capacity.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["new work, requests, cases, customers, messages, or tasks arrive at a rate that periodically or persistently exceeds service capacity", "A queue becomes unstable when effective arrivals exceed effective service rate over the relevant period."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Queueing", "one_liner": "Organizes tasks into a waiting line based on arrival and service rates.", "page_ref": "prime:queueing", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Arrivals -> demand; limited service -> capacity.", "slug": "queueing", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Queueing requires work to arrive faster than it can be served at least over some interval."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "new work, requests, cases, customers, messages, or tasks arrive at a rate that periodically or persistently exceeds service capacity", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P098-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O9"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a waiting system and its queue.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A waiting system has a queue whose size can change over time.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail queue growth indexed to the relevant context.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The queue grows during a recurring or identifiable demand-service context.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when queue growth occurs during predictable peaks.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The growth context is predictable peaks.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when queue growth occurs during seasonal cycles.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The growth context is seasonal cycles.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when queue growth occurs during incidents.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The growth context is incidents.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when queue growth occurs during launches.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The growth context is launches.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when queue growth occurs during deadlines.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The growth context is deadlines.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when queue growth occurs during outages.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The growth context is outages.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when queue growth occurs during operating-hour mismatches.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "The growth context is operating-hour mismatches.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A queue grows during a predictable peak, cycle, event, or operating-hours mismatch.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "queue grows during an identifiable demand-service context", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P098-C08-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A queue can arise unpredictably or remain steady rather than follow a predictable peak.", "slug": "queueing"}], "residual_id": "r:service_rate_matching:b062_a01_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b062_a01_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The pattern is especially useful when arrivals vary by hour, season, deadline, incident, release, shift, or case mix, and when the system has some ability to change staffing, cadence, automation, parallelism, or service windows. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: the queue grows during predictable peaks, seasonal cycles, incidents, launches, deadlines, outages, or operating-hour mismatches.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["the queue grows during predictable peaks, seasonal cycles, incidents, launches, deadlines, outages, or operating-hour mismatches", "The pattern is especially useful when arrivals vary by hour, season, deadline, incident, release, shift, or case mix, and when the system has some ability to change staffing, cadence, automation, parallelism, or service windows."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A queue can arise unpredictably or remain steady rather than follow a predictable peak.", "slug": "queueing"}], "normalized_requirement": "the queue grows during predictable peaks, seasonal cycles, incidents, launches, deadlines, outages, or operating-hour mismatches", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "the queue grows during predictable peaks, seasonal cycles, incidents, launches, deadlines, outages, or operating-hour mismatches", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A queue necessarily creates waiting or backlog whose depth or age can matter.", "role_mapping": "Waiting work -> backlog; service delay -> wait time.", "slug": "queueing", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b062_a01_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A waiting system accumulates backlog because the effective service rate is below the arrival rate over the relevant time interval, causing delay, age buildup, service-level breach, or unstable queue growth even if the queue structure itself is otherwise well defined. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: backlog age, wait time, queue depth, or drain rate matters enough that passive waiting is unacceptable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["backlog age, wait time, queue depth, or drain rate matters enough that passive waiting is unacceptable", "A waiting system accumulates backlog because the effective service rate is below the arrival rate over the relevant time interval, causing delay, age buildup, service-level breach, or unstable queue growth even if the queue structure itself is otherwise well defined."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Queueing", "one_liner": "Organizes tasks into a waiting line based on arrival and service rates.", "page_ref": "prime:queueing", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Waiting work -> backlog; service delay -> wait time.", "slug": "queueing", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A queue necessarily creates waiting or backlog whose depth or age can matter."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "backlog age, wait time, queue depth, or drain rate matters enough that passive waiting is unacceptable", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Starvation can result from priority rules even when total service capacity is adequate.", "slug": "starvation"}], "residual_id": "r:service_rate_matching:b062_a01_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b062_a01_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The structural problem is a mismatch between the rhythm of demand and the rhythm of service. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: the central issue is not merely who goes first, who is admitted, or how demand is smoothed, but whether the service side can keep pace with demand.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["the central issue is not merely who goes first, who is admitted, or how demand is smoothed, but whether the service side can keep pace with demand", "The structural problem is a mismatch between the rhythm of demand and the rhythm of service."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Starvation can result from priority rules even when total service capacity is adequate.", "slug": "starvation"}], "normalized_requirement": "the central issue is not merely who goes first, who is admitted, or how demand is smoothed, but whether the service side can keep pace with demand", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "the central issue is not merely who goes first, who is admitted, or how demand is smoothed, but whether the service side can keep pace with demand", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "operators can observe or estimate both arrival pressure and service throughput, at least approximately.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A queue becomes unstable when effective arrivals exceed effective service rate over the relevant period. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: operators can observe or estimate both arrival pressure and service throughput, at least approximately. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["operators can observe or estimate both arrival pressure and service throughput, at least approximately", "A queue becomes unstable when effective arrivals exceed effective service rate over the relevant period."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "operators can observe or estimate both arrival pressure and service throughput, at least approximately"}, {"display_text": "there are feasible service-side levers such as staffing, worker activation, automation, service-window changes, cadence changes, batch-size changes, or temporary scope simplification.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The pattern is especially useful when arrivals vary by hour, season, deadline, incident, release, shift, or case mix, and when the system has some ability to change staffing, cadence, automation, parallelism, or service windows. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: there are feasible service-side levers such as staffing, worker activation, automation, service-window changes, cadence changes, batch-size changes, or temporary scope simplification. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["there are feasible service-side levers such as staffing, worker activation, automation, service-window changes, cadence changes, batch-size changes, or temporary scope simplification", "The pattern is especially useful when arrivals vary by hour, season, deadline, incident, release, shift, or case mix, and when the system has some ability to change staffing, cadence, automation, parallelism, or service windows."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "there are feasible service-side levers such as staffing, worker activation, automation, service-window changes, cadence changes, batch-size changes, or temporary scope simplification"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 62, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-062", "ledger_sha256": "8d11bad4b920baaf03a6cfd9718f8e68df00e22a7877dc99eed563e963c80dab"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Shared Attention Anchoring Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:shared_attention_anchoring_design", "slug": "shared_attention_anchoring_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Agents need to coordinate perception, reference, interpretation, or action, but their attention may be on different objects, features, versions, moments, risk levels, or frames. Because the divergence is often invisible, participants proceed as if they share the same target, producing miscommunication, wrong action, duplicated work, unsafe handoffs, shallow participation, or false agreement.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Agents need to coordinate perception, reference, interpretation, or action, but their attention may be on different objects, features, versions, moments, risk levels, or frames. Because the divergence is often invisible, participants proceed as if they share the same target, producing miscommunication, wrong action, duplicated work, unsafe handoffs, shallow participation, or false agreement."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P098-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a person, a reference, and the target it is intended to identify.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A person uses a referring expression to indicate a target.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail ambiguous reference, not merely a concise but uniquely identifying expression.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The referring expression is ambiguous between possible targets.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "People use ambiguous expressions to refer to targets.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "people use references that are ambiguous among possible targets", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P098-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Joint attention can be established around an unambiguous named target.", "slug": "joint_attention"}], "residual_id": "r:shared_attention_anchoring_design:b062_a02_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b062_a02_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: People use ambiguous references such as “this,” “that,” “the issue,” “the patient,” “the top graph,” or “the risky case.” If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["People use ambiguous references such as “this,” “that,” “the issue,” “the patient,” “the top graph,” or “the risky case.”"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Joint attention can be established around an unambiguous named target.", "slug": "joint_attention"}], "normalized_requirement": "People use ambiguous references such as “this,” “that,” “the issue,” “the patient,” “the top graph,” or “the risky case.”", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "People use ambiguous references such as “this,” “that,” “the issue,” “the patient,” “the top graph,” or “the risky case.”", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Joint attention entails multiple actors orienting to the same object for coordinated understanding or action.", "role_mapping": "Group -> participants; target -> shared object.", "slug": "joint_attention", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b062_a02_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A group must inspect, decide, teach, repair, or act around a specific target under time, role, distance, expertise, or modality constraints. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A group must inspect, decide, teach, repair, or act around a specific target under time, role, distance, expertise, or modality constraints."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Joint Attention", "one_liner": "Two or more agents share an attentional target and each knows the other attends to it.", "page_ref": "prime:joint_attention", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Group -> participants; target -> shared object.", "slug": "joint_attention", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Joint attention entails multiple actors orienting to the same object for coordinated understanding or action."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A group must inspect, decide, teach, repair, or act around a specific target under time, role, distance, expertise, or modality constraints.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P098-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve one shared container rather than multiple unrelated contexts.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A single shared representational or perceptual container is available.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail co-presence of possible reference targets within that one container.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The same container contains multiple possible referents.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve multiplicity sufficient to create a non-unique reference set.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The container has many possible referents.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}], "predicate": "The same shared container contains many possible referents.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "one shared container holds many possible referents", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P098-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A joint-attention target can be the only object present.", "slug": "joint_attention"}], "residual_id": "r:shared_attention_anchoring_design:b062_a02_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b062_a02_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The same display, document, dashboard, artifact, image, or scene contains many possible referents. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The same display, document, dashboard, artifact, image, or scene contains many possible referents."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A joint-attention target can be the only object present.", "slug": "joint_attention"}], "normalized_requirement": "The same display, document, dashboard, artifact, image, or scene contains many possible referents.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The same display, document, dashboard, artifact, image, or scene contains many possible referents.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires evidence that attention is jointly directed to the same referent rather than merely parallel.", "role_mapping": "Relevant people -> joint attenders; same object -> referent.", "slug": "joint_attention", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b062_a02_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Agents need to coordinate perception, reference, interpretation, or action, but their attention may be on different objects, features, versions, moments, risk levels, or frames. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A handoff, briefing, review, facilitation, or training moment requires proof that all relevant people are aligned on the same object before moving on.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A handoff, briefing, review, facilitation, or training moment requires proof that all relevant people are aligned on the same object before moving on.", "Agents need to coordinate perception, reference, interpretation, or action, but their attention may be on different objects, features, versions, moments, risk levels, or frames."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Joint Attention", "one_liner": "Two or more agents share an attentional target and each knows the other attends to it.", "page_ref": "prime:joint_attention", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Relevant people -> joint attenders; same object -> referent.", "slug": "joint_attention", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires evidence that attention is jointly directed to the same referent rather than merely parallel."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A handoff, briefing, review, facilitation, or training moment requires proof that all relevant people are aligned on the same object before moving on.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Remote, hybrid, or asynchronous participants cannot rely on shared gaze, body orientation, or physical co-presence.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Remote, hybrid, or asynchronous participants cannot rely on shared gaze, body orientation, or physical co-presence. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Remote, hybrid, or asynchronous participants cannot rely on shared gaze, body orientation, or physical co-presence."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Remote, hybrid, or asynchronous participants cannot rely on shared gaze, body orientation, or physical co-presence."}, {"display_text": "A novice, outsider, patient, or cross-functional partner may see the target but not know which feature matters.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: A novice, outsider, patient, or cross-functional partner may see the target but not know which feature matters. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A novice, outsider, patient, or cross-functional partner may see the target but not know which feature matters."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "A novice, outsider, patient, or cross-functional partner may see the target but not know which feature matters."}, {"display_text": "Attention drift, tab switching, dashboard version drift, multitasking, role tunnel vision, or parallel side conversations are likely.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Agents need to coordinate perception, reference, interpretation, or action, but their attention may be on different objects, features, versions, moments, risk levels, or frames. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Attention drift, tab switching, dashboard version drift, multitasking, role tunnel vision, or parallel side conversations are likely. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Attention drift, tab switching, dashboard version drift, multitasking, role tunnel vision, or parallel side conversations are likely.", "Agents need to coordinate perception, reference, interpretation, or action, but their attention may be on different objects, features, versions, moments, risk levels, or frames."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "Attention drift, tab switching, dashboard version drift, multitasking, role tunnel vision, or parallel side conversations are likely."}, {"display_text": "A shared target has symbolic, ethical, safety, or social weight and must be attended to inclusively and non-coercively.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this deployment constraint: A shared target has symbolic, ethical, safety, or social weight and must be attended to inclusively and non-coercively. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A shared target has symbolic, ethical, safety, or social weight and must be attended to inclusively and non-coercively."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 8, "text": "A shared target has symbolic, ethical, safety, or social weight and must be attended to inclusively and non-coercively."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 62, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-062", "ledger_sha256": "8d11bad4b920baaf03a6cfd9718f8e68df00e22a7877dc99eed563e963c80dab"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Shared-Benefit Contribution Governance", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:shared_benefit_contribution_governance", "slug": "shared_benefit_contribution_governance"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A desired outcome requires multiple agents to incur individual costs for a benefit that is shared, delayed, diffuse, or partly nonexcludable, but the system lacks enough role clarity, burden legitimacy, visibility, trust, incentive alignment, or repair capacity to keep contribution from collapsing into free-riding, overload, resentment, fragmentation, or purely rivalrous behavior.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A desired outcome requires multiple agents to incur individual costs for a benefit that is shared, delayed, diffuse, or partly nonexcludable, but the system lacks enough role clarity, burden legitimacy, visibility, trust, incentive alignment, or repair capacity to keep contribution from collapsing into free-riding, overload, resentment, fragmentation, or purely rivalrous behavior."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Free riding presupposes a collective outcome produced by contributions from others.", "role_mapping": "Contributors -> producers; outcome -> shared benefit.", "slug": "free_riding", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b062_a03_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The outcome depends on more than one actor contributing effort, restraint, knowledge, resources, risk-taking, maintenance, or care. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The outcome depends on more than one actor contributing effort, restraint, knowledge, resources, risk-taking, maintenance, or care."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Free Riding", "one_liner": "The systematic under-provision that results when individuals can enjoy a non-excludable shared good without contributing proportionately to producing it.", "page_ref": "prime:free_riding", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Contributors -> producers; outcome -> shared benefit.", "slug": "free_riding", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Free riding presupposes a collective outcome produced by contributions from others."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The outcome depends on more than one actor contributing effort, restraint, knowledge, resources, risk-taking, maintenance, or care.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires locally costly contribution with benefits available to noncontributors.", "role_mapping": "Local cost -> contribution; distributed benefit -> rideable good.", "slug": "free_riding", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b062_a03_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Shared benefit is produced by distributed local sacrifice, but each actor has reason to minimize its own cost unless contribution is made meaningful, visible, fairly distributed, socially supported, and protected from exploitation. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: At least some contributors pay a visible local cost while the benefit is distributed, delayed, uncertain, or shared with noncontributors.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["At least some contributors pay a visible local cost while the benefit is distributed, delayed, uncertain, or shared with noncontributors.", "Shared benefit is produced by distributed local sacrifice, but each actor has reason to minimize its own cost unless contribution is made meaningful, visible, fairly distributed, socially supported, and protected from exploitation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Free Riding", "one_liner": "The systematic under-provision that results when individuals can enjoy a non-excludable shared good without contributing proportionately to producing it.", "page_ref": "prime:free_riding", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Local cost -> contribution; distributed benefit -> rideable good.", "slug": "free_riding", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires locally costly contribution with benefits available to noncontributors."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "At least some contributors pay a visible local cost while the benefit is distributed, delayed, uncertain, or shared with noncontributors.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Strategic complementarity entails one actor's action changing the payoff to another actor's action.", "role_mapping": "Actors -> strategists; contribution -> action payoff.", "slug": "strategic_complementarity", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b062_a03_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Shared benefit is produced by distributed local sacrifice, but each actor has reason to minimize its own cost unless contribution is made meaningful, visible, fairly distributed, socially supported, and protected from exploitation. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The actors are interdependent enough that one actor’s contribution changes the payoff, workload, safety, or opportunity of others.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The actors are interdependent enough that one actor’s contribution changes the payoff, workload, safety, or opportunity of others.", "Shared benefit is produced by distributed local sacrifice, but each actor has reason to minimize its own cost unless contribution is made meaningful, visible, fairly distributed, socially supported, and protected from exploitation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Strategic Complementarity", "one_liner": "One actor's action raises the marginal benefit of others taking the same action.", "page_ref": "prime:strategic_complementarity", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Actors -> strategists; contribution -> action payoff.", "slug": "strategic_complementarity", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Strategic complementarity entails one actor's action changing the payoff to another actor's action."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The actors are interdependent enough that one actor’s contribution changes the payoff, workload, safety, or opportunity of others.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Plausible withholding while enjoying others' contribution is the exact free-riding condition.", "role_mapping": "Shirking -> noncontribution; maintained outcome -> benefit.", "slug": "free_riding", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b062_a03_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A desired outcome requires multiple agents to incur individual costs for a benefit that is shared, delayed, diffuse, or partly nonexcludable, but the system lacks enough role clarity, burden legitimacy, visibility, trust, incentive alignment, or repair capacity to keep contribution from collapsing into free-riding, overload, resentment, fragmentation, or purely rivalrous behavior. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Free-riding, shirking, silent nonparticipation, overuse, undermaintenance, or contribution fatigue is plausible.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Free-riding, shirking, silent nonparticipation, overuse, undermaintenance, or contribution fatigue is plausible.", "A desired outcome requires multiple agents to incur individual costs for a benefit that is shared, delayed, diffuse, or partly nonexcludable, but the system lacks enough role clarity, burden legitimacy, visibility, trust, incentive alignment, or repair capacity to keep contribution from collapsing into free-riding, overload, resentment, fragmentation, or purely rivalrous behavior."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Free Riding", "one_liner": "The systematic under-provision that results when individuals can enjoy a non-excludable shared good without contributing proportionately to producing it.", "page_ref": "prime:free_riding", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Shirking -> noncontribution; maintained outcome -> benefit.", "slug": "free_riding", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Plausible withholding while enjoying others' contribution is the exact free-riding condition."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Free-riding, shirking, silent nonparticipation, overuse, undermaintenance, or contribution fatigue is plausible.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Pure command, pure market exchange, or pure competition would either be illegitimate, too costly, too brittle, or misaligned with the shared outcome.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A desired outcome requires multiple agents to incur individual costs for a benefit that is shared, delayed, diffuse, or partly nonexcludable, but the system lacks enough role clarity, burden legitimacy, visibility, trust, incentive alignment, or repair capacity to keep contribution from collapsing into free-riding, overload, resentment, fragmentation, or purely rivalrous behavior. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: Pure command, pure market exchange, or pure competition would either be illegitimate, too costly, too brittle, or misaligned with the shared outcome. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Pure command, pure market exchange, or pure competition would either be illegitimate, too costly, too brittle, or misaligned with the shared outcome.", "A desired outcome requires multiple agents to incur individual costs for a benefit that is shared, delayed, diffuse, or partly nonexcludable, but the system lacks enough role clarity, burden legitimacy, visibility, trust, incentive alignment, or repair capacity to keep contribution from collapsing into free-riding, overload, resentment, fragmentation, or purely rivalrous behavior."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Pure command, pure market exchange, or pure competition would either be illegitimate, too costly, too brittle, or misaligned with the shared outcome."}, {"display_text": "Trust, reputation, norms, identity, incentives, monitoring, or governance can be modified by design.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A desired outcome requires multiple agents to incur individual costs for a benefit that is shared, delayed, diffuse, or partly nonexcludable, but the system lacks enough role clarity, burden legitimacy, visibility, trust, incentive alignment, or repair capacity to keep contribution from collapsing into free-riding, overload, resentment, fragmentation, or purely rivalrous behavior. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: Trust, reputation, norms, identity, incentives, monitoring, or governance can be modified by design. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Trust, reputation, norms, identity, incentives, monitoring, or governance can be modified by design.", "A desired outcome requires multiple agents to incur individual costs for a benefit that is shared, delayed, diffuse, or partly nonexcludable, but the system lacks enough role clarity, burden legitimacy, visibility, trust, incentive alignment, or repair capacity to keep contribution from collapsing into free-riding, overload, resentment, fragmentation, or purely rivalrous behavior."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Trust, reputation, norms, identity, incentives, monitoring, or governance can be modified by design."}, {"display_text": "The system benefits from preserving voluntary or semi-voluntary participation rather than relying only on coercion.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: The system benefits from preserving voluntary or semi-voluntary participation rather than relying only on coercion. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The system benefits from preserving voluntary or semi-voluntary participation rather than relying only on coercion."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "The system benefits from preserving voluntary or semi-voluntary participation rather than relying only on coercion."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 62, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-062", "ledger_sha256": "8d11bad4b920baaf03a6cfd9718f8e68df00e22a7877dc99eed563e963c80dab"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Shared-Channel Multiplexing Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:shared_channel_multiplexing_design", "slug": "shared_channel_multiplexing_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Multiple streams need access to the same constrained channel, but treating the channel as a single undifferentiated resource causes collision, starvation, crosstalk, hidden overload, or unnecessary duplication of channels. The system either underuses the channel by dedicating it to one stream at a time or overuses it by mixing streams without a reliable separation and reconstruction contract.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Multiple streams need access to the same constrained channel, but treating the channel as a single undifferentiated resource causes collision, starvation, crosstalk, hidden overload, or unnecessary duplication of channels. The system either underuses the channel by dedicating it to one stream at a time or overuses it by mixing streams without a reliable separation and reconstruction contract."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Multiplexing necessarily combines multiple distinguishable streams on one channel.", "role_mapping": "Carrier -> shared channel; streams -> multiplexed inputs.", "slug": "multiplexing", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b062_a04_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Multiple streams need access to the same constrained channel, but treating the channel as a single undifferentiated resource causes collision, starvation, crosstalk, hidden overload, or unnecessary duplication of channels. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A single communication, transport, computation, attention, market, or biological channel must serve multiple distinguishable streams.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A single communication, transport, computation, attention, market, or biological channel must serve multiple distinguishable streams.", "Multiple streams need access to the same constrained channel, but treating the channel as a single undifferentiated resource causes collision, starvation, crosstalk, hidden overload, or unnecessary duplication of channels."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Multiplexing", "one_liner": "Sharing one channel among many signals by dividing time, frequency, or code.", "page_ref": "prime:multiplexing", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Carrier -> shared channel; streams -> multiplexed inputs.", "slug": "multiplexing", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Multiplexing necessarily combines multiple distinguishable streams on one channel."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A single communication, transport, computation, attention, market, or biological channel must serve multiple distinguishable streams.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Multiplexed streams may have identical timing and quality requirements.", "slug": "multiplexing"}], "residual_id": "r:shared_channel_multiplexing_design:b062_a04_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b062_a04_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Streams differ in timing, frequency, priority, burstiness, quality requirement, or tolerance for delay. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Streams differ in timing, frequency, priority, burstiness, quality requirement, or tolerance for delay."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Multiplexed streams may have identical timing and quality requirements.", "slug": "multiplexing"}], "normalized_requirement": "Streams differ in timing, frequency, priority, burstiness, quality requirement, or tolerance for delay.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Streams differ in timing, frequency, priority, burstiness, quality requirement, or tolerance for delay.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Multiplexing is needed when simultaneous unmanaged use would collide or become ambiguous despite aggregate carrier capacity.", "role_mapping": "Shared use -> combined transmission; collision -> separation problem.", "slug": "multiplexing", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b062_a04_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Multiple streams need access to the same constrained channel, but treating the channel as a single undifferentiated resource causes collision, starvation, crosstalk, hidden overload, or unnecessary duplication of channels. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The channel has enough total capacity, but unmanaged simultaneous use creates interference, collision, or ambiguity.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The channel has enough total capacity, but unmanaged simultaneous use creates interference, collision, or ambiguity.", "Multiple streams need access to the same constrained channel, but treating the channel as a single undifferentiated resource causes collision, starvation, crosstalk, hidden overload, or unnecessary duplication of channels."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Multiplexing", "one_liner": "Sharing one channel among many signals by dividing time, frequency, or code.", "page_ref": "prime:multiplexing", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Shared use -> combined transmission; collision -> separation problem.", "slug": "multiplexing", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Multiplexing is needed when simultaneous unmanaged use would collide or become ambiguous despite aggregate carrier capacity."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The channel has enough total capacity, but unmanaged simultaneous use creates interference, collision, or ambiguity.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Demultiplexing necessarily recovers the identity of each combined stream at the receiver.", "role_mapping": "Receiver -> demultiplexer; identity -> stream label.", "slug": "multiplexing", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b062_a04_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The design must increase shared utilization without erasing the distinctions that make each stream meaningful. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Receivers need to recover stream identity after combined transmission or shared use.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Receivers need to recover stream identity after combined transmission or shared use.", "The design must increase shared utilization without erasing the distinctions that make each stream meaningful."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Multiplexing", "one_liner": "Sharing one channel among many signals by dividing time, frequency, or code.", "page_ref": "prime:multiplexing", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Receiver -> demultiplexer; identity -> stream label.", "slug": "multiplexing", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Demultiplexing necessarily recovers the identity of each combined stream at the receiver."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Receivers need to recover stream identity after combined transmission or shared use.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime separates co-used streams by a stable time, frequency, code, space, or equivalent dimension.", "role_mapping": "Stable dimension -> multiplexing basis.", "slug": "multiplexing", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b062_a04_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Demand can be separated by time, frequency, code, label, lane, priority class, spatial mode, or another stable dimension. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Demand can be separated by time, frequency, code, label, lane, priority class, spatial mode, or another stable dimension."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Multiplexing", "one_liner": "Sharing one channel among many signals by dividing time, frequency, or code.", "page_ref": "prime:multiplexing", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Stable dimension -> multiplexing basis.", "slug": "multiplexing", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime separates co-used streams by a stable time, frequency, code, space, or equivalent dimension."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Demand can be separated by time, frequency, code, label, lane, priority class, spatial mode, or another stable dimension.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Creating one dedicated channel per stream is too costly, impossible, or unnecessarily wasteful.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The system either underuses the channel by dedicating it to one stream at a time or overuses it by mixing streams without a reliable separation and reconstruction contract. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Creating one dedicated channel per stream is too costly, impossible, or unnecessarily wasteful. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Creating one dedicated channel per stream is too costly, impossible, or unnecessarily wasteful.", "The system either underuses the channel by dedicating it to one stream at a time or overuses it by mixing streams without a reliable separation and reconstruction contract."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "Creating one dedicated channel per stream is too costly, impossible, or unnecessarily wasteful."}, {"display_text": "Existing queue, routing, or load-balancing controls do not solve the specific problem of separable co-use of one carrier.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Existing queue, routing, or load-balancing controls do not solve the specific problem of separable co-use of one carrier. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Existing queue, routing, or load-balancing controls do not solve the specific problem of separable co-use of one carrier."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "Existing queue, routing, or load-balancing controls do not solve the specific problem of separable co-use of one carrier."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 62, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-062", "ledger_sha256": "8d11bad4b920baaf03a6cfd9718f8e68df00e22a7877dc99eed563e963c80dab"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Shared-Input Variety Platform Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:shared_input_variety_platform_design", "slug": "shared_input_variety_platform_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 1, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Multiple outputs, teams, products, services, species, models, or interventions need partly the same enabling inputs but are produced as if each were independent. Each vertical stack repeats infrastructure, expertise, data preparation, tooling, procurement, compliance, learning, or distribution work. Alternatively, a proposed shared layer exists but lacks boundaries, allocation rules, and local-fit exceptions, so the effort either fails to produce savings or erodes the differentiated value of the outputs.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Multiple outputs, teams, products, services, species, models, or interventions need partly the same enabling inputs but are produced as if each were independent. Each vertical stack repeats infrastructure, expertise, data preparation, tooling, procurement, compliance, learning, or distribution work. Alternatively, a proposed shared layer exists but lacks boundaries, allocation rules, and local-fit exceptions, so the effort either fails to produce savings or erodes the differentiated value of the outputs."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Requisite variety concerns control capacity and does not entail a family of outputs sharing inputs.", "slug": "requisite_variety"}], "residual_id": "r:shared_input_variety_platform_design:b062_a05_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b062_a05_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Output variety is real. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Output variety is real"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Requisite variety concerns control capacity and does not entail a family of outputs sharing inputs.", "slug": "requisite_variety"}], "normalized_requirement": "Output variety is real", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Output variety is real", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P098-C11", "dnf": [], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [], "predicate": "Common inputs recur.", "resolution": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RESIDUAL", "semantic_scope": "NON_ABSTRACTION", "structural_head": "common inputs recur", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P098-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Theme and variation need not reuse productive inputs.", "slug": "theme_and_variation"}], "residual_id": "r:shared_input_variety_platform_design:b062_a05_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b062_a05_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The same input can create savings when shared, but sharing creates common constraints. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Common inputs are recurring.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Common inputs are recurring", "The same input can create savings when shared, but sharing creates common constraints."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RECLASSIFIED", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 1, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Theme and variation need not reuse productive inputs.", "slug": "theme_and_variation"}], "normalized_requirement": "Common inputs are recurring", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RECLASSIFIED", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later candidate-blind atomization classified this remainder as a threshold, parameter, materiality test, or other non-abstraction rather than a catalog gap."}, "predicate": "Common inputs are recurring", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Economies of scope necessarily arise when joint production reuses inputs more cheaply than separate production.", "role_mapping": "Separate production -> duplicated cost; shared input -> scope economy.", "slug": "economies_of_scope", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b062_a05_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Separate production duplicates cost. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Separate production duplicates cost"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Economies Of Scope", "one_liner": "Cost savings from producing varied outputs together.", "page_ref": "prime:economies_of_scope", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Separate production -> duplicated cost; shared input -> scope economy.", "slug": "economies_of_scope", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Economies of scope necessarily arise when joint production reuses inputs more cheaply than separate production."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Separate production duplicates cost", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Compositionality entails constructing varied wholes from reusable, independently meaningful components.", "role_mapping": "Commonality -> component; outputs -> compositions.", "slug": "compositionality", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b062_a05_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Commonality can be modularized. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Commonality can be modularized"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Compositionality", "one_liner": "Meaning from parts.", "page_ref": "prime:compositionality", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Commonality -> component; outputs -> compositions.", "slug": "compositionality", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Compositionality entails constructing varied wholes from reusable, independently meaningful components."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Commonality can be modularized", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Governance cost is nontrivial.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Governance cost is nontrivial. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Governance cost is nontrivial"]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Governance cost is nontrivial"}, {"display_text": "Coupling risk can be managed.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: Coupling risk can be managed. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Coupling risk can be managed"]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Coupling risk can be managed"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 62, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-062", "ledger_sha256": "8d11bad4b920baaf03a6cfd9718f8e68df00e22a7877dc99eed563e963c80dab"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Shared Mental Model Alignment", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:shared_mental_model_alignment", "slug": "shared_mental_model_alignment"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 1, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A group, team, or distributed set of actors must coordinate action, but members hold different or incomplete mental models of the system state, roles, constraints, risks, dependencies, priorities, or likely behavior of others.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A group, team, or distributed set of actors must coordinate action, but members hold different or incomplete mental models of the system state, roles, constraints, risks, dependencies, priorities, or likely behavior of others."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Strategic complementarity makes one actor's effective action depend on what others do.", "role_mapping": "Actors -> interdependent decision makers.", "slug": "strategic_complementarity", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b062_a06_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Action is interdependent. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Action is interdependent"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Strategic Complementarity", "one_liner": "One actor's action raises the marginal benefit of others taking the same action.", "page_ref": "prime:strategic_complementarity", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Actors -> interdependent decision makers.", "slug": "strategic_complementarity", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Strategic complementarity makes one actor's effective action depend on what others do."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Action is interdependent", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime is present when actors unknowingly operate with incompatible models of the same situation.", "role_mapping": "Divergent models -> inconsistent representations.", "slug": "inconsistent_shared_model", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b062_a06_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Models diverge invisibly. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Models diverge invisibly"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Inconsistent Shared Model", "one_liner": "Subsystems hold mutually incompatible models of the same external state, undetected until a forcing event requires joint action.", "page_ref": "prime:inconsistent_shared_model", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Divergent models -> inconsistent representations.", "slug": "inconsistent_shared_model", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime is present when actors unknowingly operate with incompatible models of the same situation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Models diverge invisibly", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Coordination can be costly for logistical reasons even under identical mental models.", "slug": "coordination"}], "residual_id": "r:shared_mental_model_alignment:b062_a06_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b062_a06_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Coordination cost is rising. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Coordination cost is rising"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Coordination can be costly for logistical reasons even under identical mental models.", "slug": "coordination"}], "normalized_requirement": "Coordination cost is rising", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Coordination cost is rising", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P098-C12", "dnf": [], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [], "predicate": "Shared goals are insufficient.", "resolution": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RESIDUAL", "semantic_scope": "NON_ABSTRACTION", "structural_head": "shared goals fail an unspecified sufficiency test", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P098-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Inconsistent models can occur between actors who also have conflicting goals.", "slug": "inconsistent_shared_model"}], "residual_id": "r:shared_mental_model_alignment:b062_a06_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b062_a06_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Reliable joint action requires enough shared understanding to anticipate others and the system, but each actor has only a partial view, local incentives, domain vocabulary, and time-limited attention. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Shared goals are not enough.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Shared goals are not enough", "Reliable joint action requires enough shared understanding to anticipate others and the system, but each actor has only a partial view, local incentives, domain vocabulary, and time-limited attention."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RECLASSIFIED", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 1, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Inconsistent models can occur between actors who also have conflicting goals.", "slug": "inconsistent_shared_model"}], "normalized_requirement": "Shared goals are not enough", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RECLASSIFIED", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later candidate-blind atomization classified this remainder as a threshold, parameter, materiality test, or other non-abstraction rather than a catalog gap."}, "predicate": "Shared goals are not enough", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The situation is changing.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The situation is changing. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The situation is changing"]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "The situation is changing"}, {"display_text": "Training or rehearsal requires common expectations.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this deployment constraint: Training or rehearsal requires common expectations. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Training or rehearsal requires common expectations"]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Training or rehearsal requires common expectations"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 62, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-062", "ledger_sha256": "8d11bad4b920baaf03a6cfd9718f8e68df00e22a7877dc99eed563e963c80dab"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Shared-Source Variance Isolation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:shared_source_variance_isolation", "slug": "shared_source_variance_isolation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A shared variance source crosses dimension boundaries and contaminates outputs that are being treated as independent, distinct, or separately interpretable.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A shared variance source crosses dimension boundaries and contaminates outputs that are being treated as independent, distinct, or separately interpretable."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Cross-dimensional leakage requires several dimensions to inherit influence from the same rater, instrument, batch, or pipeline.", "role_mapping": "Dimensions -> measured outputs; common process -> leaking source.", "slug": "cross_dimensional_leakage", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b062_a07_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Multiple outcome dimensions are collected through the same rater, instrument, pipeline, environment, batch, platform, time window, or organizational process. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Multiple outcome dimensions are collected through the same rater, instrument, pipeline, environment, batch, platform, time window, or organizational process."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Cross-Dimensional Leakage", "one_liner": "A single shared variance source contaminates multiple supposedly-independent output dimensions, inflating their apparent correlations above the true cross-dimensional signal.", "page_ref": "prime:cross_dimensional_leakage", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Dimensions -> measured outputs; common process -> leaking source.", "slug": "cross_dimensional_leakage", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Cross-dimensional leakage requires several dimensions to inherit influence from the same rater, instrument, batch, or pipeline."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Multiple outcome dimensions are collected through the same rater, instrument, pipeline, environment, batch, platform, time window, or organizational process.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime creates apparent correlation or factor structure across dimensions through the shared source.", "role_mapping": "Downstream structure -> apparent cross-dimensional relation.", "slug": "cross_dimensional_leakage", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b062_a07_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A downstream claim depends on the apparent correlation, clustering, factor structure, ranking, or convergence of those dimensions. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A downstream claim depends on the apparent correlation, clustering, factor structure, ranking, or convergence of those dimensions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Cross-Dimensional Leakage", "one_liner": "A single shared variance source contaminates multiple supposedly-independent output dimensions, inflating their apparent correlations above the true cross-dimensional signal.", "page_ref": "prime:cross_dimensional_leakage", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Downstream structure -> apparent cross-dimensional relation.", "slug": "cross_dimensional_leakage", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime creates apparent correlation or factor structure across dimensions through the shared source."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A downstream claim depends on the apparent correlation, clustering, factor structure, ranking, or convergence of those dimensions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Common method effects, drift, shocks, and preprocessing are canonical leakage paths.", "role_mapping": "Common shock -> shared variance.", "slug": "cross_dimensional_leakage", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b062_a07_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The measurement or data-generating process contains plausible common shocks, common method effects, calibration drift, observer expectancy, batch effects, or shared preprocessing artifacts. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The measurement or data-generating process contains plausible common shocks, common method effects, calibration drift, observer expectancy, batch effects, or shared preprocessing artifacts."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Cross-Dimensional Leakage", "one_liner": "A single shared variance source contaminates multiple supposedly-independent output dimensions, inflating their apparent correlations above the true cross-dimensional signal.", "page_ref": "prime:cross_dimensional_leakage", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Common shock -> shared variance.", "slug": "cross_dimensional_leakage", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Common method effects, drift, shocks, and preprocessing are canonical leakage paths."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The measurement or data-generating process contains plausible common shocks, common method effects, calibration drift, observer expectancy, batch effects, or shared preprocessing artifacts.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Treating contaminated dimensions as independent support is the inferential error exposed by the prime.", "role_mapping": "Compact story -> false convergence; evidence paths -> nonindependence.", "slug": "cross_dimensional_leakage", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b062_a07_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The system needs dimensional compression and comparison, but the easiest way to gather dimensions often creates a hidden common channel that makes them appear less independent than their underlying signals are. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The system rewards compact cross-dimensional stories before checking whether the dimensions had genuinely independent evidence paths.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The system rewards compact cross-dimensional stories before checking whether the dimensions had genuinely independent evidence paths.", "The system needs dimensional compression and comparison, but the easiest way to gather dimensions often creates a hidden common channel that makes them appear less independent than their underlying signals are."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Cross-Dimensional Leakage", "one_liner": "A single shared variance source contaminates multiple supposedly-independent output dimensions, inflating their apparent correlations above the true cross-dimensional signal.", "page_ref": "prime:cross_dimensional_leakage", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Compact story -> false convergence; evidence paths -> nonindependence.", "slug": "cross_dimensional_leakage", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Treating contaminated dimensions as independent support is the inferential error exposed by the prime."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The system rewards compact cross-dimensional stories before checking whether the dimensions had genuinely independent evidence paths.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 62, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-062", "ledger_sha256": "8d11bad4b920baaf03a6cfd9718f8e68df00e22a7877dc99eed563e963c80dab"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Shared-State Consistency Contract Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:shared_state_consistency_contract_design", "slug": "shared_state_consistency_contract_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Several actors or replicas read and update shared state concurrently, but the system has no precise contract for which observations are legal. Teams use vague labels such as strong, latest, synchronized, or eventual; mechanisms are chosen before invariants and client expectations are stated; read paths bypass write coordination; fault and clock assumptions remain implicit; and semantic changes are deployed as configuration changes. The result is a gap between what clients believe a successful operation means and what the system can actually guarantee.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Several actors or replicas read and update shared state concurrently, but the system has no precise contract for which observations are legal. Teams use vague labels such as strong, latest, synchronized, or eventual; mechanisms are chosen before invariants and client expectations are stated; read paths bypass write coordination; fault and clock assumptions remain implicit; and semantic changes are deployed as configuration changes. The result is a gap between what clients believe a successful operation means and what the system can actually guarantee."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A consistency model applies when multiple processes or copies observe or mutate logically shared state.", "role_mapping": "Clients or replicas -> participants; shared state -> history.", "slug": "consistency_model", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b062_a08_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Several actors or replicas read and update shared state concurrently, but the system has no precise contract for which observations are legal. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: More than one client, process, region, replica, cache, index, or offline device can observe or mutate logically shared state.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["More than one client, process, region, replica, cache, index, or offline device can observe or mutate logically shared state.", "Several actors or replicas read and update shared state concurrently, but the system has no precise contract for which observations are legal."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Consistency Model", "one_liner": "An explicit contract over which observations of shared state are legal when updates are concurrent.", "page_ref": "prime:consistency_model", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Clients or replicas -> participants; shared state -> history.", "slug": "consistency_model", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A consistency model applies when multiple processes or copies observe or mutate logically shared state."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "More than one client, process, region, replica, cache, index, or offline device can observe or mutate logically shared state.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Eventual consistency necessarily permits a replica to serve a temporarily stale view before convergence.", "role_mapping": "Lagging copy -> replica; acknowledged write -> pending convergence.", "slug": "eventual_consistency", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b062_a08_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Teams use vague labels such as strong, latest, synchronized, or eventual; mechanisms are chosen before invariants and client expectations are stated; read paths bypass write coordination; fault and clock assumptions remain implicit; and semantic changes are deployed as configuration changes. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A read can be served from a copy that may lag, diverge, reorder, or omit acknowledged writes.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A read can be served from a copy that may lag, diverge, reorder, or omit acknowledged writes.", "Teams use vague labels such as strong, latest, synchronized, or eventual; mechanisms are chosen before invariants and client expectations are stated; read paths bypass write coordination; fault and clock assumptions remain implicit; and semantic changes are deployed as configuration changes."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Eventual Consistency", "one_liner": "Distributed copies of shared state are allowed to diverge under local updates, with a deterministic merge guaranteeing they reconverge once updates stop.", "page_ref": "prime:eventual_consistency", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Lagging copy -> replica; acknowledged write -> pending convergence.", "slug": "eventual_consistency", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Eventual consistency necessarily permits a replica to serve a temporarily stale view before convergence."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A read can be served from a copy that may lag, diverge, reorder, or omit acknowledged writes.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The model specifies which coordination, waiting, rejection, merge, or stale-read outcomes are legal under delay.", "role_mapping": "Delay or partition -> execution; response -> legal behavior.", "slug": "consistency_model", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b062_a08_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Stronger shared observations usually require more ordering, waiting, metadata, quorum intersection, or refusal, while lower latency and higher partition availability permit more stale, divergent, or differently ordered observations; the design must spend coordination only where the domain invariant and client contract justify it. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The system must decide whether to coordinate, wait, redirect, reject, merge, or serve stale data during delay or partition.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The system must decide whether to coordinate, wait, redirect, reject, merge, or serve stale data during delay or partition.", "Stronger shared observations usually require more ordering, waiting, metadata, quorum intersection, or refusal, while lower latency and higher partition availability permit more stale, divergent, or differently ordered observations; the design must spend coordination only where the domain invariant and client contract justify it."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Consistency Model", "one_liner": "An explicit contract over which observations of shared state are legal when updates are concurrent.", "page_ref": "prime:consistency_model", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Delay or partition -> execution; response -> legal behavior.", "slug": "consistency_model", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The model specifies which coordination, waiting, rejection, merge, or stale-read outcomes are legal under delay."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The system must decide whether to coordinate, wait, redirect, reject, merge, or serve stale data during delay or partition.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Client-visible ordering, freshness, monotonicity, and uniqueness properties are consistency guarantees.", "role_mapping": "Invariant -> contract property; histories -> observations.", "slug": "consistency_model", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b062_a08_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Teams use vague labels such as strong, latest, synchronized, or eventual; mechanisms are chosen before invariants and client expectations are stated; read paths bypass write coordination; fault and clock assumptions remain implicit; and semantic changes are deployed as configuration changes. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Users depend on read-your-writes, monotonicity, uniqueness, balance, ownership, sequencing, or freshness invariants.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Users depend on read-your-writes, monotonicity, uniqueness, balance, ownership, sequencing, or freshness invariants.", "Teams use vague labels such as strong, latest, synchronized, or eventual; mechanisms are chosen before invariants and client expectations are stated; read paths bypass write coordination; fault and clock assumptions remain implicit; and semantic changes are deployed as configuration changes."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Consistency Model", "one_liner": "An explicit contract over which observations of shared state are legal when updates are concurrent.", "page_ref": "prime:consistency_model", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Invariant -> contract property; histories -> observations.", "slug": "consistency_model", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Client-visible ordering, freshness, monotonicity, and uniqueness properties are consistency guarantees."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Users depend on read-your-writes, monotonicity, uniqueness, balance, ownership, sequencing, or freshness invariants.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P098-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a mechanism and the advertised guarantee label.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A system mechanism is given a consistency or execution-legality label.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail an advertised guarantee claim, not merely discussion of the label.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The mechanism is advertised as satisfying the labeled guarantee.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the absence of an executable legality definition.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "No executable definition of legal behavior accompanies the advertised label.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when the mechanism is advertised as providing eventual consistency.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The advertised label is eventual consistency.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when the mechanism is advertised as providing causal consistency.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The advertised label is causal consistency.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when the mechanism is advertised as providing serializability.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The advertised label is serializability.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when the mechanism is advertised as providing linearizability.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The advertised label is linearizability.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when the mechanism is advertised as providing strong consistency.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The advertised label is strong consistency.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A mechanism is advertised with a consistency or execution-legality label without an executable definition of legal behavior.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "mechanism carries a guarantee label without executable legality definition", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P098-C13-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A consistency model can be rigorously specified rather than merely advertised.", "slug": "consistency_model"}], "residual_id": "r:shared_state_consistency_contract_design:b062_a08_c7", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b062_a08_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Teams use vague labels such as strong, latest, synchronized, or eventual; mechanisms are chosen before invariants and client expectations are stated; read paths bypass write coordination; fault and clock assumptions remain implicit; and semantic changes are deployed as configuration changes. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A mechanism is advertised as eventual, causal, serializable, linearizable, or strongly consistent without an executable legality definition.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A mechanism is advertised as eventual, causal, serializable, linearizable, or strongly consistent without an executable legality definition.", "Teams use vague labels such as strong, latest, synchronized, or eventual; mechanisms are chosen before invariants and client expectations are stated; read paths bypass write coordination; fault and clock assumptions remain implicit; and semantic changes are deployed as configuration changes."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A consistency model can be rigorously specified rather than merely advertised.", "slug": "consistency_model"}], "normalized_requirement": "A mechanism is advertised as eventual, causal, serializable, linearizable, or strongly consistent without an executable legality definition.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A mechanism is advertised as eventual, causal, serializable, linearizable, or strongly consistent without an executable legality definition.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P098-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a replicated system and an incident affecting replica state or coordination.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A replicated system experiences a replica-related condition or incident.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail inability to translate the incident into client-visible impact.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The incident cannot be mapped into consequences visible to clients.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only for replica lag.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The replica-related condition is replica lag.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only for replica conflict.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The replica-related condition is replica conflict.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only for replica repair.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The replica-related condition is replica repair.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only for split-brain incident.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The replica-related condition is split-brain incident.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A replica-related condition or incident cannot be translated into client-visible impact.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "replica incident cannot be mapped to client-visible impact", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P098-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Temporary divergence can have well-understood client-visible consequences.", "slug": "eventual_consistency"}], "residual_id": "r:shared_state_consistency_contract_design:b062_a08_c8", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b062_a08_c8", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Replica lag, conflict, repair, or split-brain incidents cannot be translated into client-visible impact. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Replica lag, conflict, repair, or split-brain incidents cannot be translated into client-visible impact."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Temporary divergence can have well-understood client-visible consequences.", "slug": "eventual_consistency"}], "normalized_requirement": "Replica lag, conflict, repair, or split-brain incidents cannot be translated into client-visible impact.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Replica lag, conflict, repair, or split-brain incidents cannot be translated into client-visible impact.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [8], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A service exposes tunable read or write concerns, follower reads, local writes, or session tokens.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Teams use vague labels such as strong, latest, synchronized, or eventual; mechanisms are chosen before invariants and client expectations are stated; read paths bypass write coordination; fault and clock assumptions remain implicit; and semantic changes are deployed as configuration changes. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: A service exposes tunable read or write concerns, follower reads, local writes, or session tokens. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A service exposes tunable read or write concerns, follower reads, local writes, or session tokens.", "Teams use vague labels such as strong, latest, synchronized, or eventual; mechanisms are chosen before invariants and client expectations are stated; read paths bypass write coordination; fault and clock assumptions remain implicit; and semantic changes are deployed as configuration changes."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "A service exposes tunable read or write concerns, follower reads, local writes, or session tokens."}, {"display_text": "An architecture is moving between single-leader, multi-leader, leaderless, cached, edge, or offline-first modes.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: An architecture is moving between single-leader, multi-leader, leaderless, cached, edge, or offline-first modes. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["An architecture is moving between single-leader, multi-leader, leaderless, cached, edge, or offline-first modes."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "An architecture is moving between single-leader, multi-leader, leaderless, cached, edge, or offline-first modes."}, {"display_text": "A consistency setting, database, region layout, or API version is being changed for performance or availability reasons.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: A consistency setting, database, region layout, or API version is being changed for performance or availability reasons. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [9], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A consistency setting, database, region layout, or API version is being changed for performance or availability reasons."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 9, "text": "A consistency setting, database, region layout, or API version is being changed for performance or availability reasons."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 62, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-062", "ledger_sha256": "8d11bad4b920baaf03a6cfd9718f8e68df00e22a7877dc99eed563e963c80dab"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Shared Subset Intersection Mapping", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:shared_subset_intersection_mapping", "slug": "shared_subset_intersection_mapping"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system needs to know what is common across several collections, constraints, actor positions, eligibility pools, evidence streams, or datasets, but the overlap is inferred informally, computed with unstable identifiers, or treated as more meaningful than the underlying membership rules support.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system needs to know what is common across several collections, constraints, actor positions, eligibility pools, evidence streams, or datasets, but the overlap is inferred informally, computed with unstable identifiers, or treated as more meaningful than the underlying membership rules support."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Set intersection is exactly the collection of elements satisfying every input membership condition.", "role_mapping": "Membership conditions -> input sets; retained elements -> intersection.", "slug": "intersection", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b062_a09_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Intersection strengthens a claim by requiring every membership predicate to hold, but each additional collection also imports its own scope assumptions, identity rules, data defects, and exclusion errors. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A decision depends on elements satisfying every one of several membership conditions.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A decision depends on elements satisfying every one of several membership conditions.", "Intersection strengthens a claim by requiring every membership predicate to hold, but each additional collection also imports its own scope assumptions, identity rules, data defects, and exclusion errors."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Intersection", "one_liner": "The elements common to all of several collections.", "page_ref": "prime:intersection", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Membership conditions -> input sets; retained elements -> intersection.", "slug": "intersection", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Set intersection is exactly the collection of elements satisfying every input membership condition."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A decision depends on elements satisfying every one of several membership conditions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Intersection necessarily compares two or more collections for common members.", "role_mapping": "Collections -> sets; common members -> intersection.", "slug": "intersection", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b062_a09_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system needs to know what is common across several collections, constraints, actor positions, eligibility pools, evidence streams, or datasets, but the overlap is inferred informally, computed with unstable identifiers, or treated as more meaningful than the underlying membership rules support. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Multiple teams, databases, actors, or rulesets maintain collections that must be compared for shared members.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Multiple teams, databases, actors, or rulesets maintain collections that must be compared for shared members.", "A system needs to know what is common across several collections, constraints, actor positions, eligibility pools, evidence streams, or datasets, but the overlap is inferred informally, computed with unstable identifiers, or treated as more meaningful than the underlying membership rules support."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Intersection", "one_liner": "The elements common to all of several collections.", "page_ref": "prime:intersection", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Collections -> sets; common members -> intersection.", "slug": "intersection", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Intersection necessarily compares two or more collections for common members."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Multiple teams, databases, actors, or rulesets maintain collections that must be compared for shared members.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "All-of-these membership logic is conjunction expressed as set intersection.", "role_mapping": "Filters -> sets; all-of logic -> intersection.", "slug": "intersection", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b062_a09_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A query, policy, schedule, filter, or matching process uses all-of-these logic. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A query, policy, schedule, filter, or matching process uses all-of-these logic."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Intersection", "one_liner": "The elements common to all of several collections.", "page_ref": "prime:intersection", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Filters -> sets; all-of logic -> intersection.", "slug": "intersection", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "All-of-these membership logic is conjunction expressed as set intersection."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A query, policy, schedule, filter, or matching process uses all-of-these logic.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Every member of an intersection necessarily belongs to each input set, providing the required membership evidence.", "role_mapping": "Retained element -> intersection member; inputs -> source sets.", "slug": "intersection", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b062_a09_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system needs to know what is common across several collections, constraints, actor positions, eligibility pools, evidence streams, or datasets, but the overlap is inferred informally, computed with unstable identifiers, or treated as more meaningful than the underlying membership rules support. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Downstream users need evidence that each retained element belongs to each input collection.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Downstream users need evidence that each retained element belongs to each input collection.", "A system needs to know what is common across several collections, constraints, actor positions, eligibility pools, evidence streams, or datasets, but the overlap is inferred informally, computed with unstable identifiers, or treated as more meaningful than the underlying membership rules support."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Intersection", "one_liner": "The elements common to all of several collections.", "page_ref": "prime:intersection", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Retained element -> intersection member; inputs -> source sets.", "slug": "intersection", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Every member of an intersection necessarily belongs to each input set, providing the required membership evidence."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Downstream users need evidence that each retained element belongs to each input collection.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The common subset may be empty, unexpectedly small, or surprisingly large and therefore requires interpretation.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The common subset may be empty, unexpectedly small, or surprisingly large and therefore requires interpretation. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The common subset may be empty, unexpectedly small, or surprisingly large and therefore requires interpretation."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "The common subset may be empty, unexpectedly small, or surprisingly large and therefore requires interpretation."}, {"display_text": "Identity, duplicates, aliases, stale versions, or boundary cases make common-membership claims uncertain.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Intersection strengthens a claim by requiring every membership predicate to hold, but each additional collection also imports its own scope assumptions, identity rules, data defects, and exclusion errors. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Identity, duplicates, aliases, stale versions, or boundary cases make common-membership claims uncertain. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Identity, duplicates, aliases, stale versions, or boundary cases make common-membership claims uncertain.", "Intersection strengthens a claim by requiring every membership predicate to hold, but each additional collection also imports its own scope assumptions, identity rules, data defects, and exclusion errors."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Identity, duplicates, aliases, stale versions, or boundary cases make common-membership claims uncertain."}, {"display_text": "The intersection will be reused as an input to allocation, access, recommendation, coordination, or inference.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The intersection will be reused as an input to allocation, access, recommendation, coordination, or inference. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The intersection will be reused as an input to allocation, access, recommendation, coordination, or inference."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "The intersection will be reused as an input to allocation, access, recommendation, coordination, or inference."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 62, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-062", "ledger_sha256": "8d11bad4b920baaf03a6cfd9718f8e68df00e22a7877dc99eed563e963c80dab"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Shortcut-Reliance Mitigation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:shortcut_reliance_mitigation", "slug": "shortcut_reliance_mitigation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "An adapting system is rewarded for success on a training, practice, or evaluation distribution in which an incidental cue correlates with the intended target. Because that cue is cheaper, more available, or more stable inside the sampled distribution than the underlying structure, the learner relies on it. The system then appears accurate, skilled, or aligned until the cue is absent, inverted, adversarially manipulated, ethically disallowed, or no longer correlated in deployment.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "An adapting system is rewarded for success on a training, practice, or evaluation distribution in which an incidental cue correlates with the intended target. Because that cue is cheaper, more available, or more stable inside the sampled distribution than the underlying structure, the learner relies on it. The system then appears accurate, skilled, or aligned until the cue is absent, inverted, adversarially manipulated, ethically disallowed, or no longer correlated in deployment."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Shortcut learning requires a person or model to learn a predictive rule from training feedback or examples.", "role_mapping": "Learner -> trained system; feedback -> learning signal.", "slug": "shortcut_learning", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b062_a10_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A model, person, organization, animal, policy, or scoring system learns from repeated feedback, examples, rewards, labels, tests, or operational outcomes. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A model, person, organization, animal, policy, or scoring system learns from repeated feedback, examples, rewards, labels, tests, or operational outcomes."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Shortcut Learning", "one_liner": "An adapting system replaces the structure it was meant to learn with a cheaper incidental feature that correlates with success on its training distribution, and collapses sharply once that correlation breaks.", "page_ref": "prime:shortcut_learning", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Learner -> trained system; feedback -> learning signal.", "slug": "shortcut_learning", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Shortcut learning requires a person or model to learn a predictive rule from training feedback or examples."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A model, person, organization, animal, policy, or scoring system learns from repeated feedback, examples, rewards, labels, tests, or operational outcomes.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime exploits incidental, noncausal correlations in the training or evaluation context.", "role_mapping": "Incidental cue -> shortcut feature; success -> label or reward.", "slug": "shortcut_learning", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b062_a10_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "An adapting system is rewarded for success on a training, practice, or evaluation distribution in which an incidental cue correlates with the intended target. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The training or evaluation context contains incidental cues that correlate with success: artifacts, collection sources, templates, timestamps, annotator habits, instrument marks, background features, group proxies, leakage channels, or stable-but-noncausal context.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The training or evaluation context contains incidental cues that correlate with success: artifacts, collection sources, templates, timestamps, annotator habits, instrument marks, background features, group proxies, leakage channels, or stable-but-noncausal context.", "An adapting system is rewarded for success on a training, practice, or evaluation distribution in which an incidental cue correlates with the intended target."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Shortcut Learning", "one_liner": "An adapting system replaces the structure it was meant to learn with a cheaper incidental feature that correlates with success on its training distribution, and collapses sharply once that correlation breaks.", "page_ref": "prime:shortcut_learning", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Incidental cue -> shortcut feature; success -> label or reward.", "slug": "shortcut_learning", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime exploits incidental, noncausal correlations in the training or evaluation context."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The training or evaluation context contains incidental cues that correlate with success: artifacts, collection sources, templates, timestamps, annotator habits, instrument marks, background features, group proxies, leakage channels, or stable-but-noncausal context.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A shortcut is necessarily an easier correlate that performs adequately in-sample instead of the intended structure.", "role_mapping": "Cheaper correlate -> shortcut; intended target -> displaced feature.", "slug": "shortcut_learning", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b062_a10_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "An adapting system is rewarded for success on a training, practice, or evaluation distribution in which an incidental cue correlates with the intended target. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The intended target is harder to learn than a cheaper correlate that works well enough under current evaluation.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The intended target is harder to learn than a cheaper correlate that works well enough under current evaluation.", "An adapting system is rewarded for success on a training, practice, or evaluation distribution in which an incidental cue correlates with the intended target."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Shortcut Learning", "one_liner": "An adapting system replaces the structure it was meant to learn with a cheaper incidental feature that correlates with success on its training distribution, and collapses sharply once that correlation breaks.", "page_ref": "prime:shortcut_learning", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Cheaper correlate -> shortcut; intended target -> displaced feature.", "slug": "shortcut_learning", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A shortcut is necessarily an easier correlate that performs adequately in-sample instead of the intended structure."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The intended target is harder to learn than a cheaper correlate that works well enough under current evaluation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P098-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the learner, existing generalization tests, and the intended learned structure.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A learner is evaluated by existing generalization tests for whether it learned an intended structure.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the possibility that evaluation retains the same shortcut correlations.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The tests may retain the shortcut correlations available to the learner.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must connect the test correlations to the shortcut alternative rather than arbitrary correlation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The retained correlations are the same shortcuts whose use the tests are meant to distinguish from learning the intended structure.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail the evidential incapacity as a consequence of shortcut preservation.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Because those shortcut correlations may persist in the tests, the tests cannot prove that the intended structure was learned.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the inability to prove intended-structure learning.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The tests do not establish that the intended structure was learned.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Existing generalization tests may preserve the same shortcut correlations and therefore cannot prove that the intended structure was learned.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "tests that preserve shortcut correlations cannot prove intended-structure learning", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P098-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Overfitting can fail tests through noise without reliance on a stable shortcut correlation.", "slug": "overfitting"}], "residual_id": "r:shortcut_reliance_mitigation:b062_a10_c8", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b062_a10_c8", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Existing generalization tests may preserve the same shortcut correlations and therefore cannot prove that the intended structure was learned. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Existing generalization tests may preserve the same shortcut correlations and therefore cannot prove that the intended structure was learned."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Overfitting can fail tests through noise without reliance on a stable shortcut correlation.", "slug": "overfitting"}], "normalized_requirement": "Existing generalization tests may preserve the same shortcut correlations and therefore cannot prove that the intended structure was learned.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Existing generalization tests may preserve the same shortcut correlations and therefore cannot prove that the intended structure was learned.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [8], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Aggregate validation looks strong but there is reason to suspect context dependence, subgroup fragility, artifact reliance, or implausibly high performance.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Optimization under bounded evidence rewards whatever predicts success in the sampled context, while valid use requires dependence on a structure that remains meaningful outside that context. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Aggregate validation looks strong but there is reason to suspect context dependence, subgroup fragility, artifact reliance, or implausibly high performance. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Aggregate validation looks strong but there is reason to suspect context dependence, subgroup fragility, artifact reliance, or implausibly high performance.", "Optimization under bounded evidence rewards whatever predicts success in the sampled context, while valid use requires dependence on a structure that remains meaningful outside that context."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Aggregate validation looks strong but there is reason to suspect context dependence, subgroup fragility, artifact reliance, or implausibly high performance."}, {"display_text": "The deployment environment may differ from training through distribution shift, concept drift, acquisition changes, adversarial adaptation, policy changes, or population differences.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "An adapting system is rewarded for success on a training, practice, or evaluation distribution in which an incidental cue correlates with the intended target. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: The deployment environment may differ from training through distribution shift, concept drift, acquisition changes, adversarial adaptation, policy changes, or population differences. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The deployment environment may differ from training through distribution shift, concept drift, acquisition changes, adversarial adaptation, policy changes, or population differences.", "An adapting system is rewarded for success on a training, practice, or evaluation distribution in which an incidental cue correlates with the intended target."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The deployment environment may differ from training through distribution shift, concept drift, acquisition changes, adversarial adaptation, policy changes, or population differences."}, {"display_text": "Errors would be costly because collapse is sharp, hidden until deployment, discriminatory, safety-relevant, or difficult to reverse.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The system then appears accurate, skilled, or aligned until the cue is absent, inverted, adversarially manipulated, ethically disallowed, or no longer correlated in deployment. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Errors would be costly because collapse is sharp, hidden until deployment, discriminatory, safety-relevant, or difficult to reverse. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Errors would be costly because collapse is sharp, hidden until deployment, discriminatory, safety-relevant, or difficult to reverse.", "The system then appears accurate, skilled, or aligned until the cue is absent, inverted, adversarially manipulated, ethically disallowed, or no longer correlated in deployment."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Errors would be costly because collapse is sharp, hidden until deployment, discriminatory, safety-relevant, or difficult to reverse."}, {"display_text": "The system is being promoted, scaled, certified, or used as evidence of a capability rather than kept as a narrow context-bound routine.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Optimization under bounded evidence rewards whatever predicts success in the sampled context, while valid use requires dependence on a structure that remains meaningful outside that context. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: The system is being promoted, scaled, certified, or used as evidence of a capability rather than kept as a narrow context-bound routine. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The system is being promoted, scaled, certified, or used as evidence of a capability rather than kept as a narrow context-bound routine.", "Optimization under bounded evidence rewards whatever predicts success in the sampled context, while valid use requires dependence on a structure that remains meaningful outside that context."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "The system is being promoted, scaled, certified, or used as evidence of a capability rather than kept as a narrow context-bound routine."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 62, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-062", "ledger_sha256": "8d11bad4b920baaf03a6cfd9718f8e68df00e22a7877dc99eed563e963c80dab"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Side-Channel Leakage Containment", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:side_channel_leakage_containment", "slug": "side_channel_leakage_containment"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system exposes legitimate outputs, responses, errors, aggregates, logs, timing, ordering, resource-use patterns, or metadata while intending to protect some internal fact. Observers combine those consequences with prior knowledge, repeated queries, comparisons, or cross-system signals to reconstruct information that the declared access policy never meant to disclose. The failure is structural because the access boundary covers the nominal payload but not the full observation channel.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system exposes legitimate outputs, responses, errors, aggregates, logs, timing, ordering, resource-use patterns, or metadata while intending to protect some internal fact. Observers combine those consequences with prior knowledge, repeated queries, comparisons, or cross-system signals to reconstruct information that the declared access policy never meant to disclose. The failure is structural because the access boundary covers the nominal payload but not the full observation channel."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A side channel exists when protected state changes observable behavior outside the authorized payload.", "role_mapping": "Protected fact -> secret; behavior -> side-channel observable.", "slug": "side_channel_attack", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b062_a11_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Response time, size, ordering, retries, errors, cache behavior, rate-limit effects, or aggregate shifts may encode state. In this condition set, the requirement is: The protected fact changes how the system behaves even when the payload is policy-compliant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The protected fact changes how the system behaves even when the payload is policy-compliant."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Side Channel Attack", "one_liner": "A system's legitimate outputs reveal information its access policy meant to protect, via observable consequences the policy never enumerated.", "page_ref": "prime:side_channel_attack", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Protected fact -> secret; behavior -> side-channel observable.", "slug": "side_channel_attack", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A side channel exists when protected state changes observable behavior outside the authorized payload."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The protected fact changes how the system behaves even when the payload is policy-compliant.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Exploitation necessarily compares timing, outputs, availability, or other observables across probes or cases.", "role_mapping": "Comparisons -> observations; variants -> probes.", "slug": "side_channel_attack", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b062_a11_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Differential comparison turns small legitimate variations into inference evidence. In this condition set, the requirement is: Observers can compare outputs across cases, times, accounts, regions, or query variants.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Observers can compare outputs across cases, times, accounts, regions, or query variants."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Side Channel Attack", "one_liner": "A system's legitimate outputs reveal information its access policy meant to protect, via observable consequences the policy never enumerated.", "page_ref": "prime:side_channel_attack", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Comparisons -> observations; variants -> probes.", "slug": "side_channel_attack", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Exploitation necessarily compares timing, outputs, availability, or other observables across probes or cases."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Observers can compare outputs across cases, times, accounts, regions, or query variants.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P099-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve an access policy and the controlled aspects it enumerates.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An access policy names controlled aspects of a system.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail enumeration within the policy, not merely implicit control.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The access policy explicitly enumerates controlled aspects.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the omission of observable consequences.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The policy does not enumerate the observable consequences of access.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when the policy enumerates fields.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The enumerated controlled aspects are fields.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when the policy enumerates permissions.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The enumerated controlled aspects are permissions.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "An access policy enumerates controlled fields or permissions but does not enumerate observable consequences.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "access policy enumerates access controls but omits observable consequences", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P099-C01-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Minimum-necessary disclosure can govern observable consequences as well as fields.", "slug": "minimum_necessary_disclosure"}], "residual_id": "r:side_channel_leakage_containment:b062_a11_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b062_a11_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The policy treats the declared interface as the only channel. In this condition set, the requirement is: An access policy enumerates fields or permissions but not observable consequences.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["An access policy enumerates fields or permissions but not observable consequences."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Minimum-necessary disclosure can govern observable consequences as well as fields.", "slug": "minimum_necessary_disclosure"}], "normalized_requirement": "An access policy enumerates fields or permissions but not observable consequences.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "An access policy enumerates fields or permissions but not observable consequences.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Outputs are minimized but metadata, telemetry, error messages, counts, or availability are still exposed.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Minimizing payload alone does not minimize inference. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Outputs are minimized but metadata, telemetry, error messages, counts, or availability are still exposed. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Outputs are minimized but metadata, telemetry, error messages, counts, or availability are still exposed.", "Minimizing payload alone does not minimize inference."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Outputs are minimized but metadata, telemetry, error messages, counts, or availability are still exposed."}, {"display_text": "Shared infrastructure lets one tenant, user, team, or adversary observe effects caused by another.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Resource contention, scheduling, cache, queue, or quota behavior can create an accidental communication channel. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Shared infrastructure lets one tenant, user, team, or adversary observe effects caused by another. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Shared infrastructure lets one tenant, user, team, or adversary observe effects caused by another.", "Resource contention, scheduling, cache, queue, or quota behavior can create an accidental communication channel."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Shared infrastructure lets one tenant, user, team, or adversary observe effects caused by another."}, {"display_text": "Public aggregates, dashboards, leaderboards, or reports are generated from sensitive microdata.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Membership, contribution, or event occurrence can be inferred from small differences. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Public aggregates, dashboards, leaderboards, or reports are generated from sensitive microdata. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Public aggregates, dashboards, leaderboards, or reports are generated from sensitive microdata.", "Membership, contribution, or event occurrence can be inferred from small differences."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Public aggregates, dashboards, leaderboards, or reports are generated from sensitive microdata."}, {"display_text": "A trusted intermediary or broker sees routing, timing, subscription, or delivery metadata.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A routing layer can leak even when content is hidden. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: A trusted intermediary or broker sees routing, timing, subscription, or delivery metadata. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A trusted intermediary or broker sees routing, timing, subscription, or delivery metadata.", "A routing layer can leak even when content is hidden."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "A trusted intermediary or broker sees routing, timing, subscription, or delivery metadata."}, {"display_text": "The system operates under repeated probing or adaptive adversarial queries.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Repeated lawful access can convert low-bandwidth leakage into high-confidence reconstruction. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: The system operates under repeated probing or adaptive adversarial queries. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The system operates under repeated probing or adaptive adversarial queries.", "Repeated lawful access can convert low-bandwidth leakage into high-confidence reconstruction."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 8, "text": "The system operates under repeated probing or adaptive adversarial queries."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 62, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-062", "ledger_sha256": "8d11bad4b920baaf03a6cfd9718f8e68df00e22a7877dc99eed563e963c80dab"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Sign–Meaning Alignment", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:sign_meaning_alignment", "slug": "sign_meaning_alignment"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 1 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 1}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a mismatch between sign form and meaning uptake. The producer controls the form, but interpreters complete the meaning using prior experience, local context, social conventions, resemblance cues, urgency, language background, and expectations about the situation.\n\nThis means a technically accurate label can still fail. An icon can look obvious to designers and opaque to users. A policy term can carry legal meaning for experts and a different everyday meaning for applicants. A warning can name a hazard without causing people to understand the required action. In all of these cases, the sign is not merely ugly or poorly worded; it is structurally misaligned with audience interpretation.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A word, label, icon, mark, heading, representation, or message evokes a meaning different from the one the designer, institution, or community needs it to convey."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Indexical meaning necessarily varies with context, speaker, audience, or situation even when the form is unchanged.", "role_mapping": "Same form -> indexical sign; audience context -> interpretation.", "slug": "indexicality", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b062_a12_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially relevant when signs are high-stakes, unfamiliar, translated, abbreviated, culturally loaded, reused across contexts, or interpreted by multiple audiences with different conventions. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Different audiences interpret the same form differently.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Different audiences interpret the same form differently.", "It is especially relevant when signs are high-stakes, unfamiliar, translated, abbreviated, culturally loaded, reused across contexts, or interpreted by multiple audiences with different conventions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Indexicality", "one_liner": "Sign refers to its object through an actual existential or causal connection rather than resemblance or convention.", "page_ref": "prime:indexicality", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Same form -> indexical sign; audience context -> interpretation.", "slug": "indexicality", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Indexical meaning necessarily varies with context, speaker, audience, or situation even when the form is unchanged."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Different audiences interpret the same form differently.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A sign is new, unfamiliar, specialized, translated, abbreviated, or culturally loaded.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially relevant when signs are high-stakes, unfamiliar, translated, abbreviated, culturally loaded, reused across contexts, or interpreted by multiple audiences with different conventions. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: A sign is new, unfamiliar, specialized, translated, abbreviated, or culturally loaded. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A sign is new, unfamiliar, specialized, translated, abbreviated, or culturally loaded.", "It is especially relevant when signs are high-stakes, unfamiliar, translated, abbreviated, culturally loaded, reused across contexts, or interpreted by multiple audiences with different conventions."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "A sign is new, unfamiliar, specialized, translated, abbreviated, or culturally loaded."}, {"display_text": "A sign has consequences for safety, eligibility, authority, consent, navigation, or coordination.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: A sign has consequences for safety, eligibility, authority, consent, navigation, or coordination. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A sign has consequences for safety, eligibility, authority, consent, navigation, or coordination."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "A sign has consequences for safety, eligibility, authority, consent, navigation, or coordination."}, {"display_text": "A sign has migrated across channels, products, jurisdictions, languages, or time periods.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: A sign has migrated across channels, products, jurisdictions, languages, or time periods. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A sign has migrated across channels, products, jurisdictions, languages, or time periods."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "A sign has migrated across channels, products, jurisdictions, languages, or time periods."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 62, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-062", "ledger_sha256": "8d11bad4b920baaf03a6cfd9718f8e68df00e22a7877dc99eed563e963c80dab"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Sign-Type Selection", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:sign_type_selection", "slug": "sign_type_selection"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 1, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a sign chosen without regard to how people will infer its meaning. Designers may prefer a familiar icon, a compact symbol, a color code, or a badge without asking whether the audience can understand it through resemblance, evidence linkage, learned convention, or hybrid cues.\n\nWhen the wrong sign type is chosen, the sign may look polished but still fail. An icon can resemble the wrong thing; an indicator can imply evidence it does not actually possess; a symbol can require convention that users never learned; a hybrid sign can produce conflicting cues.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A sign, label, marker, icon, indicator, badge, warning, or symbol is chosen without considering how its audience will infer meaning, so the sign relies on the wrong kind of resemblance, evidence link, learned convention, or combination of cues."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime exactly distinguishes whether a sign works by resemblance, causal indication, or convention.", "role_mapping": "Candidate sign -> representamen; meaning relation -> sign type.", "slug": "icon_index_symbol_distinction", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b062_a13_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use it when a team is choosing among icons, indicators, labels, badges, codes, warnings, color marks, status signs, route symbols, scientific visuals, or ritual markers. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A team is deciding whether a meaning should be carried by an icon, indicator, label, code, badge, color, gesture, warning, map symbol, or status marker.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A team is deciding whether a meaning should be carried by an icon, indicator, label, code, badge, color, gesture, warning, map symbol, or status marker.", "Use it when a team is choosing among icons, indicators, labels, badges, codes, warnings, color marks, status signs, route symbols, scientific visuals, or ritual markers."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Icon–Index–Symbol Distinction", "one_liner": "Types of signs.", "page_ref": "prime:icon_index_symbol_distinction", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Candidate sign -> representamen; meaning relation -> sign type.", "slug": "icon_index_symbol_distinction", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime exactly distinguishes whether a sign works by resemblance, causal indication, or convention."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A team is deciding whether a meaning should be carried by an icon, indicator, label, code, badge, color, gesture, warning, map symbol, or status marker.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P099-C02", "dnf": [], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [], "predicate": "Users must act quickly.", "resolution": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RESIDUAL", "semantic_scope": "NON_ABSTRACTION", "structural_head": "users face an unspecified rapid-action requirement", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P099-C02-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P099-C02", "dnf": [], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [], "predicate": "Users cannot stop to learn a complex arbitrary code.", "resolution": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RESIDUAL", "semantic_scope": "NON_ABSTRACTION", "structural_head": "users cannot pause action to learn complex arbitrary code", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P099-C02-U2"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Screening can require extensive learned interpretation and need not concern sign type.", "slug": "screening"}], "residual_id": "r:sign_type_selection:b062_a13_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b062_a13_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Designers may prefer a familiar icon, a compact symbol, a color code, or a badge without asking whether the audience can understand it through resemblance, evidence linkage, learned convention, or hybrid cues. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Users must act quickly and cannot stop to learn a complex arbitrary code.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Users must act quickly and cannot stop to learn a complex arbitrary code.", "Designers may prefer a familiar icon, a compact symbol, a color code, or a badge without asking whether the audience can understand it through resemblance, evidence linkage, learned convention, or hybrid cues."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RECLASSIFIED", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 2, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Screening can require extensive learned interpretation and need not concern sign type.", "slug": "screening"}], "normalized_requirement": "Users must act quickly and cannot stop to learn a complex arbitrary code.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RECLASSIFIED", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later candidate-blind atomization classified this remainder as a threshold, parameter, materiality test, or other non-abstraction rather than a catalog gap."}, "predicate": "Users must act quickly and cannot stop to learn a complex arbitrary code.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The distinction permits symbolic representation but does not entail that a particular meaning is abstract.", "slug": "icon_index_symbol_distinction"}], "residual_id": "r:sign_type_selection:b062_a13_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b062_a13_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A sign, label, marker, icon, indicator, badge, warning, or symbol is chosen without considering how its audience will infer meaning, so the sign relies on the wrong kind of resemblance, evidence link, learned convention, or combination of cues. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The meaning is abstract, institutional, or status-based and cannot be conveyed by simple resemblance.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The meaning is abstract, institutional, or status-based and cannot be conveyed by simple resemblance.", "A sign, label, marker, icon, indicator, badge, warning, or symbol is chosen without considering how its audience will infer meaning, so the sign relies on the wrong kind of resemblance, evidence link, learned convention, or combination of cues."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The distinction permits symbolic representation but does not entail that a particular meaning is abstract.", "slug": "icon_index_symbol_distinction"}], "normalized_requirement": "The meaning is abstract, institutional, or status-based and cannot be conveyed by simple resemblance.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The meaning is abstract, institutional, or status-based and cannot be conveyed by simple resemblance.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Icons and symbols need not be causally linked indices of an underlying state.", "slug": "icon_index_symbol_distinction"}], "residual_id": "r:sign_type_selection:b062_a13_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b062_a13_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "An icon can resemble the wrong thing; an indicator can imply evidence it does not actually possess; a symbol can require convention that users never learned; a hybrid sign can produce conflicting cues. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A visible sign is expected to indicate a real state, evidence source, authorization, or causal condition.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A visible sign is expected to indicate a real state, evidence source, authorization, or causal condition.", "An icon can resemble the wrong thing; an indicator can imply evidence it does not actually possess; a symbol can require convention that users never learned; a hybrid sign can produce conflicting cues."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Icons and symbols need not be causally linked indices of an underlying state.", "slug": "icon_index_symbol_distinction"}], "normalized_requirement": "A visible sign is expected to indicate a real state, evidence source, authorization, or causal condition.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A visible sign is expected to indicate a real state, evidence source, authorization, or causal condition.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "When wording is held aside and the representational relation itself is being redesigned, the icon-index-symbol distinction is the governing choice.", "role_mapping": "Sign type -> representational relation.", "slug": "icon_index_symbol_distinction", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b062_a13_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "When the wrong sign type is chosen, the sign may look polished but still fail. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Existing signs are being redesigned and the issue is not wording repair but the sign type itself.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Existing signs are being redesigned and the issue is not wording repair but the sign type itself.", "When the wrong sign type is chosen, the sign may look polished but still fail."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Icon–Index–Symbol Distinction", "one_liner": "Types of signs.", "page_ref": "prime:icon_index_symbol_distinction", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Sign type -> representational relation.", "slug": "icon_index_symbol_distinction", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "When wording is held aside and the representational relation itself is being redesigned, the icon-index-symbol distinction is the governing choice."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Existing signs are being redesigned and the issue is not wording repair but the sign type itself.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Different audiences bring different conventions, making a supposedly obvious icon or symbol risky.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Do not use it merely because an artifact is an icon or symbol. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Different audiences bring different conventions, making a supposedly obvious icon or symbol risky. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Different audiences bring different conventions, making a supposedly obvious icon or symbol risky.", "Do not use it merely because an artifact is an icon or symbol."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Different audiences bring different conventions, making a supposedly obvious icon or symbol risky."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 62, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-062", "ledger_sha256": "8d11bad4b920baaf03a6cfd9718f8e68df00e22a7877dc99eed563e963c80dab"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Signal Amplification", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:signal_amplification", "slug": "signal_amplification"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 2, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a mismatch between signal importance and signal force. A signal may be meaningful in the sense that it points to risk, opportunity, coordination need, or decision-relevant information, but the system treats it as background noise. That mismatch can arise because the source has low status, because the signal appears early and weak, because evidence is scattered, because the channel is not watched by decision makers, or because receivers do not know what to do with it.\n\nThe danger is that the signal becomes strong only after a crisis, scandal, outage, harm, or missed opportunity. By then the system has effectively delegated signal amplification to failure. This archetype designs the amplification pathway before uncontrolled escalation has to do the work.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A meaningful signal exists but is too weak, noisy, local, or low-status to trigger appropriate response."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P099-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a meaningful signal and the actors for whom it is relevant.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A meaningful signal is available to relevant actors.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve failure of signal uptake rather than absence of the signal itself.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Despite the signal existing, relevant actors fail to confer an uptake property on it.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by failure to notice the signal.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Relevant actors do not notice the signal.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by failure to trust the signal.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Relevant actors do not trust the signal.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by failure to regard the signal as actionable.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Relevant actors do not treat the signal as actionable.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A meaningful signal exists, but relevant actors fail to notice it, trust it, or treat it as actionable.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "meaningful signal fails to achieve actor uptake", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P099-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Amplification can increase an already noticed and trusted signal.", "slug": "amplification"}], "residual_id": "r:signal_amplification:b062_a14_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b062_a14_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A signal may be meaningful in the sense that it points to risk, opportunity, coordination need, or decision-relevant information, but the system treats it as background noise. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A meaningful signal exists, but relevant actors do not notice it, do not trust it, or do not treat it as actionable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A meaningful signal exists, but relevant actors do not notice it, do not trust it, or do not treat it as actionable.", "A signal may be meaningful in the sense that it points to risk, opportunity, coordination need, or decision-relevant information, but the system treats it as background noise."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "No complete alarm_fatigue instance preserves its exact defining mechanism while falsifying the mapped branch; removing the mapped role or relation removes a constitutive exact-record element.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Alarm Fatigue", "one_liner": "Reframe an operator's habitual silencing of clinical alarms as the rational response to a warning channel whose predictive value has collapsed, relocating the fix from the operator's discipline to the channel's specificity.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:alarm_fatigue", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "alarm_fatigue"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "alarm_fatigue", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P099-C03-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent exact-record review confirms universal entailment of one complete DNF branch without a qualifier."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "No complete error_message_opacity instance preserves its exact defining mechanism while falsifying the mapped branch; removing the mapped role or relation removes a constitutive exact-record element.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Error-Message Opacity", "one_liner": "Diagnose the post-failure interface defect where a system correctly detects and announces a fault but the message omits the repair-supporting content — cause, context, next action, escalation — so the user is told they are stuck without being told how to get unstuck.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:error_message_opacity", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "error_message_opacity"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "error_message_opacity", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P099-C03-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent exact-record review confirms universal entailment of one complete DNF branch without a qualifier."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "No complete correction_burial instance preserves its exact defining mechanism while falsifying the mapped branch; removing the mapped role or relation removes a constitutive exact-record element.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Correction Burial", "one_liner": "The editorial pathology in which a correction reaches a systematically smaller audience than the error it repairs — the original ran at high amplitude, the correction at low — so the public belief record stays unrepaired even though a correction was formally issued.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:correction_burial", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "correction_burial"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "correction_burial", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P099-C03-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent exact-record review confirms universal entailment of one complete DNF branch without a qualifier."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "No complete confirmation_fatigue instance preserves its exact defining mechanism while falsifying the mapped branch; removing the mapped role or relation removes a constitutive exact-record element.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Confirmation Fatigue", "one_liner": "The interaction-design failure where a blocking confirmation prompt fires so often, and so rarely marks a truly consequential choice, that users develop an automatic dismiss reflex that discharges the prompt without reading it — leaving it syntactically present but informationally inert.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:confirmation_fatigue", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "confirmation_fatigue"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "confirmation_fatigue", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P099-C03-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent exact-record review confirms universal entailment of one complete DNF branch without a qualifier."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A meaningful signal exists, but relevant actors do not notice it, do not trust it, or do not treat it as actionable.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A signal can decay in transit without noise, hierarchy, or attention competition.", "slug": "signal_decay_and_fadeout"}], "residual_id": "r:signal_amplification:b062_a14_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b062_a14_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A meaningful signal exists but is too weak, noisy, local, or low-status to trigger appropriate response. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The signal is buried in noise, scattered across local observations, suppressed by status hierarchy, or weaker than competing attention demands.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The signal is buried in noise, scattered across local observations, suppressed by status hierarchy, or weaker than competing attention demands.", "A meaningful signal exists but is too weak, noisy, local, or low-status to trigger appropriate response."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A signal can decay in transit without noise, hierarchy, or attention competition.", "slug": "signal_decay_and_fadeout"}], "normalized_requirement": "The signal is buried in noise, scattered across local observations, suppressed by status hierarchy, or weaker than competing attention demands.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The signal is buried in noise, scattered across local observations, suppressed by status hierarchy, or weaker than competing attention demands.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P099-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a signal and the role required to receive its effect.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A signal is directed toward an actor or audience role.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail dependence on active reception, interpretation, decision, or coordinated audience response.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The signal requires an active uptake role rather than passive awareness alone.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the contrast with passive awareness alone.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Mere passive awareness is insufficient for the signal.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by the receiver role.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The required active role is a receiver.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by the interpreter role.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The required active role is a interpreter.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by the decision maker role.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The required active role is a decision maker.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by the coordinated audience role.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The required active role is a coordinated audience.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A signal requires an active receiver, interpreter, decision maker, or coordinated audience rather than passive awareness alone.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "signal depends on an active uptake role beyond passive awareness", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P099-C04-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Signaling can be broadcast without a coordinated decision audience.", "slug": "signaling"}], "residual_id": "r:signal_amplification:b062_a14_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b062_a14_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "That mismatch can arise because the source has low status, because the signal appears early and weak, because evidence is scattered, because the channel is not watched by decision makers, or because receivers do not know what to do with it. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The signal needs a receiver, interpreter, decision maker, or coordinated audience rather than mere passive awareness.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The signal needs a receiver, interpreter, decision maker, or coordinated audience rather than mere passive awareness.", "That mismatch can arise because the source has low status, because the signal appears early and weak, because evidence is scattered, because the channel is not watched by decision makers, or because receivers do not know what to do with it."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "No complete alarm_fatigue instance preserves its exact defining mechanism while falsifying the mapped branch; removing the mapped role or relation removes a constitutive exact-record element.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Alarm Fatigue", "one_liner": "Reframe an operator's habitual silencing of clinical alarms as the rational response to a warning channel whose predictive value has collapsed, relocating the fix from the operator's discipline to the channel's specificity.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:alarm_fatigue", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "alarm_fatigue"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "alarm_fatigue", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P099-C04-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent exact-record review confirms universal entailment of one complete DNF branch without a qualifier."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "No complete receptive_language instance preserves its exact defining mechanism while falsifying the mapped branch; removing the mapped role or relation removes a constitutive exact-record element.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Receptive Language", "one_liner": "The comprehension arm of language capacity — receiving, parsing, and interpreting incoming linguistic input — defined in contrastive opposition to expressive (production) language, dissociable from it, and assessed on its own through an ordered processing stack with output held near zero.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:receptive_language", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "receptive_language"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "receptive_language", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P099-C04-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent exact-record review confirms universal entailment of one complete DNF branch without a qualifier."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "No complete confirmation_fatigue instance preserves its exact defining mechanism while falsifying the mapped branch; removing the mapped role or relation removes a constitutive exact-record element.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Confirmation Fatigue", "one_liner": "The interaction-design failure where a blocking confirmation prompt fires so often, and so rarely marks a truly consequential choice, that users develop an automatic dismiss reflex that discharges the prompt without reading it — leaving it syntactically present but informationally inert.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:confirmation_fatigue", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "confirmation_fatigue"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "confirmation_fatigue", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P099-C04-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent exact-record review confirms universal entailment of one complete DNF branch without a qualifier."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "No complete functional_communication instance preserves its exact defining mechanism while falsifying the mapped branch; removing the mapped role or relation removes a constitutive exact-record element.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Functional Communication", "one_liner": "Judge a communicative act by whether it accomplishes a needed real-world function with a real partner — request, refuse, greet, comment, ask for help — rather than by its phonological accuracy or grammaticality, reclassifying every non-speech channel as a first-class success.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:functional_communication", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "functional_communication"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "functional_communication", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P099-C04-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent exact-record review confirms universal entailment of one complete DNF branch without a qualifier."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "No complete error_message_opacity instance preserves its exact defining mechanism while falsifying the mapped branch; removing the mapped role or relation removes a constitutive exact-record element.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Error-Message Opacity", "one_liner": "Diagnose the post-failure interface defect where a system correctly detects and announces a fault but the message omits the repair-supporting content — cause, context, next action, escalation — so the user is told they are stuck without being told how to get unstuck.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:error_message_opacity", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "error_message_opacity"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "error_message_opacity", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P099-C04-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent exact-record review confirms universal entailment of one complete DNF branch without a qualifier."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "No complete prompt_injection instance preserves its exact defining mechanism while falsifying the mapped branch; removing the mapped role or relation removes a constitutive exact-record element.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Prompt Injection", "one_liner": "Untrusted content delivered to a language model through a data channel is interpreted as instructions rather than material to process, so an embedded directive executes at the model's privilege — the failure being the absence of any in-band boundary between instructions and data, not a lapse in alignment.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:prompt_injection", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "prompt_injection"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "prompt_injection", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P099-C04-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent exact-record review confirms universal entailment of one complete DNF branch without a qualifier."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "No complete responsiveness_channel instance preserves its exact defining mechanism while falsifying the mapped branch; removing the mapped role or relation removes a constitutive exact-record element.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Responsiveness channel", "one_liner": "Turn vague openness to feedback into auditable accountability by requiring three co-occurring structures — a published intake surface, a documented response discipline, and a public decision log whose latency and rejection-with-reason rate anyone can read.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:responsiveness_channel", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "responsiveness_channel"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "responsiveness_channel", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P099-C04-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent exact-record review confirms universal entailment of one complete DNF branch without a qualifier."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "No complete mode_error instance preserves its exact defining mechanism while falsifying the mapped branch; removing the mapped role or relation removes a constitutive exact-record element.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Mode Error", "one_liner": "The interaction failure in which the same user action is interpreted differently by a system depending on a hidden mode the user does not perceive — the user acts correctly for the mode they believe is active, and the system, in the actually active mode, does something else.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:mode_error", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "mode_error"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "mode_error", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P099-C04-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent exact-record review confirms universal entailment of one complete DNF branch without a qualifier."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "No complete narrative_gap instance preserves its exact defining mechanism while falsifying the mapped branch; removing the mapped role or relation removes a constitutive exact-record element.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Narrative Gap", "one_liner": "Turn a deliberate, cued absence in a story — a withheld fact or unrendered scene the reader is meant to feel and close by inference — into an active device tuned on one knob: the gap's width and signposting.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:narrative_gap", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "narrative_gap"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "narrative_gap", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P099-C04-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent exact-record review confirms universal entailment of one complete DNF branch without a qualifier."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The signal needs a receiver, interpreter, decision maker, or coordinated audience rather than mere passive awareness.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The cost of missing or delaying the signal is materially higher than the cost of carefully amplifying it.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The danger is that the signal becomes strong only after a crisis, scandal, outage, harm, or missed opportunity. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The cost of missing or delaying the signal is materially higher than the cost of carefully amplifying it. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The cost of missing or delaying the signal is materially higher than the cost of carefully amplifying it.", "The danger is that the signal becomes strong only after a crisis, scandal, outage, harm, or missed opportunity."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "The cost of missing or delaying the signal is materially higher than the cost of carefully amplifying it."}, {"display_text": "There is an identifiable channel through which the signal can be strengthened, repeated, routed, visualized, or made credible.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A good use case has a meaningful signal, identifiable receivers, a reason the signal is currently weak, and a plausible action or decision that amplification should support. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: There is an identifiable channel through which the signal can be strengthened, repeated, routed, visualized, or made credible. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["There is an identifiable channel through which the signal can be strengthened, repeated, routed, visualized, or made credible.", "A good use case has a meaningful signal, identifiable receivers, a reason the signal is currently weak, and a plausible action or decision that amplification should support."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "There is an identifiable channel through which the signal can be strengthened, repeated, routed, visualized, or made credible."}, {"display_text": "Uncontrolled amplification would create risks of distortion, panic, manipulation, false certainty, or attention crowd-out.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This archetype designs the amplification pathway before uncontrolled escalation has to do the work. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: Uncontrolled amplification would create risks of distortion, panic, manipulation, false certainty, or attention crowd-out. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Uncontrolled amplification would create risks of distortion, panic, manipulation, false certainty, or attention crowd-out.", "This archetype designs the amplification pathway before uncontrolled escalation has to do the work."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Uncontrolled amplification would create risks of distortion, panic, manipulation, false certainty, or attention crowd-out."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 62, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-062", "ledger_sha256": "8d11bad4b920baaf03a6cfd9718f8e68df00e22a7877dc99eed563e963c80dab"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Signal Habituation Control", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:signal_habituation_control", "slug": "signal_habituation_control"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "An alert, warning, alarm, notification, cue, or broadcast channel meant to pull attention toward an important condition is over-fired or poorly targeted. Repeated exposure and declining base-rate informativeness teach receivers that the channel is usually noise, so future true signals arrive through a channel whose response power has been spent.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "An alert, warning, alarm, notification, cue, or broadcast channel meant to pull attention toward an important condition is over-fired or poorly targeted. Repeated exposure and declining base-rate informativeness teach receivers that the channel is usually noise, so future true signals arrive through a channel whose response power has been spent."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime concerns a signal intended to recruit attention rather than passive telemetry.", "role_mapping": "Channel -> alerting channel; receiver -> adapting audience.", "slug": "habituation_to_repeated_signal", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b062_a15_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "An alert, warning, alarm, notification, cue, or broadcast channel meant to pull attention toward an important condition is over-fired or poorly targeted. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The channel is explicitly designed to recruit receiver attention, not merely to record background telemetry.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The channel is explicitly designed to recruit receiver attention, not merely to record background telemetry.", "An alert, warning, alarm, notification, cue, or broadcast channel meant to pull attention toward an important condition is over-fired or poorly targeted."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Habituation to Repeated Signal", "one_liner": "A signal channel meant to recruit attention to a flagged condition loses its recruiting power as exposure accumulates, through the compounding of receiver habituation and base-rate degradation, until the channel is noisily active but informationally bankrupt.", "page_ref": "prime:habituation_to_repeated_signal", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Channel -> alerting channel; receiver -> adapting audience.", "slug": "habituation_to_repeated_signal", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime concerns a signal intended to recruit attention rather than passive telemetry."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The channel is explicitly designed to recruit receiver attention, not merely to record background telemetry.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Repeated exposure of the same receiver population to similar firings is the necessary antecedent of signal habituation.", "role_mapping": "Repeated firings -> stimulus; receivers -> habituating population.", "slug": "habituation_to_repeated_signal", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b062_a15_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The same receiver population is repeatedly exposed to similar firings, duplicates, near-duplicates, or routine low-severity warnings. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The same receiver population is repeatedly exposed to similar firings, duplicates, near-duplicates, or routine low-severity warnings."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Habituation to Repeated Signal", "one_liner": "A signal channel meant to recruit attention to a flagged condition loses its recruiting power as exposure accumulates, through the compounding of receiver habituation and base-rate degradation, until the channel is noisily active but informationally bankrupt.", "page_ref": "prime:habituation_to_repeated_signal", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Repeated firings -> stimulus; receivers -> habituating population.", "slug": "habituation_to_repeated_signal", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Repeated exposure of the same receiver population to similar firings is the necessary antecedent of signal habituation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The same receiver population is repeatedly exposed to similar firings, duplicates, near-duplicates, or routine low-severity warnings.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P099-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a signaling system and its population of firings.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A signaling system produces a population of signal firings.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve many problematic firings across the named union and must allow those firings to be a mixture of the named types rather than requiring many of one type.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Many firings collectively fall within the union of false positives, low-actionability cases, wrong-recipient messages, stale reminders, and weak advisories.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail high-salience presentation of the collectively prevalent problematic firings.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Those problematic firings are presented with high-salience styling.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Many firings collectively fall within the named union of problematic firing types and are presented with high-salience styling.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "many firings across a union of problematic types receive high-salience styling", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P099-C05-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Even accurate and actionable repeated signals can become habituated.", "slug": "habituation_to_repeated_signal"}], "residual_id": "r:signal_habituation_control:b062_a15_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b062_a15_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Many firings are false positives, low-actionability cases, wrong-recipient messages, stale reminders, or weak advisories presented with high-salience styling. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Many firings are false positives, low-actionability cases, wrong-recipient messages, stale reminders, or weak advisories presented with high-salience styling."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "No complete alarm_fatigue instance preserves its exact defining mechanism while falsifying the mapped branch; removing the mapped role or relation removes a constitutive exact-record element.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Alarm Fatigue", "one_liner": "Reframe an operator's habitual silencing of clinical alarms as the rational response to a warning channel whose predictive value has collapsed, relocating the fix from the operator's discipline to the channel's specificity.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:alarm_fatigue", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "alarm_fatigue"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "alarm_fatigue", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P099-C05-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent exact-record review confirms universal entailment of one complete DNF branch without a qualifier. The exact predictive-value-collapse and low-specificity structure makes the raw A branch-selection guard unnecessary."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_SYNTHESIS", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Without the guard, a complete confirmation_fatigue instance can select another candidate-named presentation or feature value and miss the source branch; with the guard, that counterexample is excluded without changing principal roles or relation.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Confirmation Fatigue", "one_liner": "The interaction-design failure where a blocking confirmation prompt fires so often, and so rarely marks a truly consequential choice, that users develop an automatic dismiss reflex that discharges the prompt without reading it — leaving it syntactically present but informationally inert.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:confirmation_fatigue", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O3"], "guard_type": "THRESHOLD_CROSSING", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "confirmation_prompt_high_salience_styling", "predicate": "The blocking confirmation prompt is presented with high-salience styling.", "rationale": "The candidate supplies the principal roles and relation; one atomic, candidate-anchored context fact fills exactly the remaining branch obligation without restating the head."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "confirmation_fatigue"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "confirmation_prompt_high_salience_styling"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "confirmation_fatigue", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P099-C05-U1", "why_it_fits": "The candidate directly supplies the structural spine, while one atomic candidate-anchored context predicate fills every remaining obligation in one complete DNF branch."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Many firings are false positives, low-actionability cases, wrong-recipient messages, stale reminders, or weak advisories presented with high-salience styling.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P099-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a signaling system, its signal, and a feedback channel.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A signaling system can receive feedback about the disposition or quality of its signal.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail absence of reliable feedback rather than merely imperfect signal delivery.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The system lacks reliable feedback about a relevant signal property or outcome.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by missing reliable feedback about the signal was noticed.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Whether the signal was noticed.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by missing reliable feedback about the signal was acted on.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Whether the signal was acted on.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by missing reliable feedback about the signal was useful.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Whether the signal was useful.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by missing reliable feedback about the signal was false.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "Whether the signal was false.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by missing reliable feedback about the signal was duplicative.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "Whether the signal was duplicative.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by missing reliable feedback about the signal was harmful.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "Whether the signal was harmful.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A system lacks reliable feedback about a relevant disposition, outcome, or quality of its signal.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "signaling system lacks reliable feedback about signal uptake or quality", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P099-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Feedback can be absent in many systems unrelated to repeated alert habituation.", "slug": "feedback"}], "residual_id": "r:signal_habituation_control:b062_a15_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b062_a15_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The system lacks reliable feedback about whether the signal was noticed, acted on, useful, false, duplicative, or harmful. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The system lacks reliable feedback about whether the signal was noticed, acted on, useful, false, duplicative, or harmful."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Feedback can be absent in many systems unrelated to repeated alert habituation.", "slug": "feedback"}], "normalized_requirement": "The system lacks reliable feedback about whether the signal was noticed, acted on, useful, false, duplicative, or harmful.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The system lacks reliable feedback about whether the signal was noticed, acted on, useful, false, duplicative, or harmful.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The receiver has finite attentional capacity and incurs real cost to inspect, decide, respond, or interrupt current work.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Sensitivity, coverage, liability, and vigilance pull toward more signals; receiver capacity, diagnostic value, and actionability pull toward fewer, better signals. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The receiver has finite attentional capacity and incurs real cost to inspect, decide, respond, or interrupt current work. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The receiver has finite attentional capacity and incurs real cost to inspect, decide, respond, or interrupt current work.", "Sensitivity, coverage, liability, and vigilance pull toward more signals; receiver capacity, diagnostic value, and actionability pull toward fewer, better signals."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The receiver has finite attentional capacity and incurs real cost to inspect, decide, respond, or interrupt current work."}, {"display_text": "Rare critical conditions still need the channel to recruit rapid attention, making complete muting unsafe.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "An alert, warning, alarm, notification, cue, or broadcast channel meant to pull attention toward an important condition is over-fired or poorly targeted. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Rare critical conditions still need the channel to recruit rapid attention, making complete muting unsafe. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Rare critical conditions still need the channel to recruit rapid attention, making complete muting unsafe.", "An alert, warning, alarm, notification, cue, or broadcast channel meant to pull attention toward an important condition is over-fired or poorly targeted."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Rare critical conditions still need the channel to recruit rapid attention, making complete muting unsafe."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 62, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-062", "ledger_sha256": "8d11bad4b920baaf03a6cfd9718f8e68df00e22a7877dc99eed563e963c80dab"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Signal Persistence and Refresh Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:signal_persistence_and_refresh_design", "slug": "signal_persistence_and_refresh_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Signals weaken for different reasons. Energy dissipates, messages lose detail at handoff, influence competes with newer cues, concentrations clear, receivers forget, channels absorb or distort, and context changes what a signal means. Systems often respond with more source output because it is visible and controllable. That can miss blocked routes and weak receivers while increasing noise, cost, fatigue, accumulation, or manipulation.\n\nThe deeper problem is an absent persistence contract. No one has stated the receiver, useful threshold, duration or distance, uncertainty margin, or expiry condition. Without that contract the system cannot distinguish adequate service from a fading trace, choose a proportionate intervention, or know when to stop.\n\nPersistence also creates a second risk: the signal outlives its authority or value. Caches replay old instructions, reminders become harassment, boosts accumulate, and relays continue after withdrawal. A mature design therefore treats refresh and retirement as coupled responsibilities.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A signal, influence, instruction, concentration, cue, or effect weakens across time, distance, media, receivers, or handoffs, yet the system has no explicit persistence requirement, decay model, endpoint evidence, renewal policy, or retirement path. Source-side activity is mistaken for durable effect, and ad hoc repetition or amplification creates fatigue, interference, accumulation, cost, or stale persistence."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Signal decay necessarily makes a signal less usable after transmission distance or delay.", "role_mapping": "Delay or distance -> decay interval; usable signal -> retained effect.", "slug": "signal_decay_and_fadeout", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b063_a01_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when a decision, action, state, memory, concentration, warning, control command, or influence must remain usable after delay, distance, routing, transformation, or repeated exposure. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: a decision depends on a signal remaining usable after delay or distance.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["a decision depends on a signal remaining usable after delay or distance", "Use this archetype when a decision, action, state, memory, concentration, warning, control command, or influence must remain usable after delay, distance, routing, transformation, or repeated exposure."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Signal Decay and Fadeout", "one_liner": "Signals, influence, or effects systematically weaken over time or space.", "page_ref": "prime:signal_decay_and_fadeout", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Delay or distance -> decay interval; usable signal -> retained effect.", "slug": "signal_decay_and_fadeout", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Signal decay necessarily makes a signal less usable after transmission distance or delay."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "a decision depends on a signal remaining usable after delay or distance", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Fadeout entails receivers at later times or weaker locations losing the intended effect.", "role_mapping": "Weak region or later time -> attenuated receiver.", "slug": "signal_decay_and_fadeout", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b063_a01_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "That can miss blocked routes and weak receivers while increasing noise, cost, fatigue, accumulation, or manipulation. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: receivers in weak regions or later times lose the intended effect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["receivers in weak regions or later times lose the intended effect", "That can miss blocked routes and weak receivers while increasing noise, cost, fatigue, accumulation, or manipulation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Signal Decay and Fadeout", "one_liner": "Signals, influence, or effects systematically weaken over time or space.", "page_ref": "prime:signal_decay_and_fadeout", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Weak region or later time -> attenuated receiver.", "slug": "signal_decay_and_fadeout", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Fadeout entails receivers at later times or weaker locations losing the intended effect."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "receivers in weak regions or later times lose the intended effect", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Signal components and receivers can attenuate at different rates under the prime.", "role_mapping": "Components or groups -> decay profiles.", "slug": "signal_decay_and_fadeout", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b063_a01_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A signal, influence, instruction, concentration, cue, or effect weakens across time, distance, media, receivers, or handoffs, yet the system has no explicit persistence requirement, decay model, endpoint evidence, renewal policy, or retirement path. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: different signal components or receiver groups decay at different rates.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["different signal components or receiver groups decay at different rates", "A signal, influence, instruction, concentration, cue, or effect weakens across time, distance, media, receivers, or handoffs, yet the system has no explicit persistence requirement, decay model, endpoint evidence, renewal policy, or retirement path."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Signal Decay and Fadeout", "one_liner": "Signals, influence, or effects systematically weaken over time or space.", "page_ref": "prime:signal_decay_and_fadeout", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Components or groups -> decay profiles.", "slug": "signal_decay_and_fadeout", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Signal components and receivers can attenuate at different rates under the prime."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "different signal components or receiver groups decay at different rates", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A healthy source with degraded endpoint effect is a canonical source-to-receiver fadeout pattern.", "role_mapping": "Source measure -> emitted signal; endpoint outcome -> received effect.", "slug": "signal_decay_and_fadeout", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b063_a01_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is most valuable when source-side activity looks healthy while endpoints fade, or when ad hoc reminders, repeaters, boosts, and redundant channels have accumulated without a shared service level. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: source measurements remain healthy while endpoint outcomes degrade.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["source measurements remain healthy while endpoint outcomes degrade", "It is most valuable when source-side activity looks healthy while endpoints fade, or when ad hoc reminders, repeaters, boosts, and redundant channels have accumulated without a shared service level."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Signal Decay and Fadeout", "one_liner": "Signals, influence, or effects systematically weaken over time or space.", "page_ref": "prime:signal_decay_and_fadeout", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source measure -> emitted signal; endpoint outcome -> received effect.", "slug": "signal_decay_and_fadeout", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A healthy source with degraded endpoint effect is a canonical source-to-receiver fadeout pattern."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "source measurements remain healthy while endpoint outcomes degrade", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "reminders, doses, repeaters, relays, or redundant channels are being added ad hoc.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is most valuable when source-side activity looks healthy while endpoints fade, or when ad hoc reminders, repeaters, boosts, and redundant channels have accumulated without a shared service level. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: reminders, doses, repeaters, relays, or redundant channels are being added ad hoc. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["reminders, doses, repeaters, relays, or redundant channels are being added ad hoc", "It is most valuable when source-side activity looks healthy while endpoints fade, or when ad hoc reminders, repeaters, boosts, and redundant channels have accumulated without a shared service level."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "reminders, doses, repeaters, relays, or redundant channels are being added ad hoc"}, {"display_text": "a refreshed signal can accumulate, saturate, habituate, or become obsolete.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Caches replay old instructions, reminders become harassment, boosts accumulate, and relays continue after withdrawal. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: a refreshed signal can accumulate, saturate, habituate, or become obsolete. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["a refreshed signal can accumulate, saturate, habituate, or become obsolete", "Caches replay old instructions, reminders become harassment, boosts accumulate, and relays continue after withdrawal."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "a refreshed signal can accumulate, saturate, habituate, or become obsolete"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 63, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-063", "ledger_sha256": "1a1ab7ab8768cc6b70cb27c4eb45116c75bd1fc82828128391064c16c8073111"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Signal Value Preservation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:signal_value_preservation", "slug": "signal_value_preservation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A channel is created to distinguish meaningful cases from ordinary cases, but issuance expands faster than evidence quality, event base rates, or receiver capacity can support. Readers adapt by discounting the signal, ignoring it, raising their internal threshold, or treating it as strategic noise. The channel may continue to fire frequently, but each firing carries less information and recruits less legitimate action.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A channel is created to distinguish meaningful cases from ordinary cases, but issuance expands faster than evidence quality, event base rates, or receiver capacity can support. Readers adapt by discounting the signal, ignoring it, raising their internal threshold, or treating it as strategic noise. The channel may continue to fire frequently, but each firing carries less information and recruits less legitimate action."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Signal devaluation necessarily follows expansion of a once-selective signal to too many cases.", "role_mapping": "Growing share -> inflated issuance; same signal -> devalued marker.", "slug": "signal_devaluation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b063_a02_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Expansion can be intentional marketing, defensive compliance, automated alerting, grade inflation, credential proliferation, or political rhetoric. In this condition set, the requirement is: The same signal is issued to a growing share of cases.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The same signal is issued to a growing share of cases."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Signal Devaluation", "one_liner": "A signal erodes in informativeness as issuance expands and readers adapt.", "page_ref": "prime:signal_devaluation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Growing share -> inflated issuance; same signal -> devalued marker.", "slug": "signal_devaluation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Signal devaluation necessarily follows expansion of a once-selective signal to too many cases."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The same signal is issued to a growing share of cases.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Cheap issuance relative to reputational benefit permits low-cost imitation and erodes diagnostic value.", "role_mapping": "Issuance cost -> signal cost; being seen -> signaling payoff.", "slug": "signal_devaluation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b063_a02_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "When senders gain from the label and bear little cost for low-quality use, inflation pressure rises. In this condition set, the requirement is: Signal issuance is cheap relative to the benefit of being seen as signaled.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Signal issuance is cheap relative to the benefit of being seen as signaled."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Signal Devaluation", "one_liner": "A signal erodes in informativeness as issuance expands and readers adapt.", "page_ref": "prime:signal_devaluation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Issuance cost -> signal cost; being seen -> signaling payoff.", "slug": "signal_devaluation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Cheap issuance relative to reputational benefit permits low-cost imitation and erodes diagnostic value."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Signal issuance is cheap relative to the benefit of being seen as signaled.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Repeated weak or false firings teach receivers that the marker carries little information.", "role_mapping": "Weak firings -> degraded evidence; receiver learning -> devaluation.", "slug": "signal_devaluation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b063_a02_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Readers rationally update on the channel's base rate and may stop responding even to true cases. In this condition set, the requirement is: Receivers learn from repeated false, weak, stale, or non-actionable firings.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Receivers learn from repeated false, weak, stale, or non-actionable firings."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Signal Devaluation", "one_liner": "A signal erodes in informativeness as issuance expands and readers adapt.", "page_ref": "prime:signal_devaluation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Weak firings -> degraded evidence; receiver learning -> devaluation.", "slug": "signal_devaluation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Repeated weak or false firings teach receivers that the marker carries little information."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Receivers learn from repeated false, weak, stale, or non-actionable firings.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P099-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a signal and a context that changes over time.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A signal operates in a changing context.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail absence of signal renewal.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The signal is not renewed.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail absence of signal retirement.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The signal is not retired.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail absence of signal revalidation.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The signal is not revalidated.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail absence of signal differentiation.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The signal is not differentiated.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the changing-context timing of the complete adaptation failure.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "All four adaptation omissions persist as context changes.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "As context changes, a signal is neither renewed, retired, revalidated, nor differentiated.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "signal receives none of four adaptations as context changes", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P099-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A signal can fade physically while still being periodically revalidated.", "slug": "signal_decay_and_fadeout"}], "residual_id": "r:signal_value_preservation:b063_a02_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b063_a02_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A once-informative signal can become generic as the population adapts around it. In this condition set, the requirement is: The signal is not renewed, retired, revalidated, or differentiated as context changes.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The signal is not renewed, retired, revalidated, or differentiated as context changes."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A signal can fade physically while still being periodically revalidated.", "slug": "signal_decay_and_fadeout"}], "normalized_requirement": "The signal is not renewed, retired, revalidated, or differentiated as context changes.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The signal is not renewed, retired, revalidated, or differentiated as context changes.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P099-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the signal, its promised response, and the actual action role.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A signal promises a response and an actor or system can take actual action.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail absence of coupling between the promised response and what is done.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The response promised by the signal is decoupled from actual action.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "A signal's promised response is decoupled from actual action.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "signal promise is disconnected from actual action", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P099-C08-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A signal can lose value through overissuance even when every promised response occurs.", "slug": "signal_devaluation"}], "residual_id": "r:signal_value_preservation:b063_a02_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b063_a02_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Warnings, certifications, and urgency markers devalue when nothing different happens after they appear. In this condition set, the requirement is: The signal's promised response is decoupled from actual action.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The signal's promised response is decoupled from actual action."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "No complete confirmation_fatigue instance preserves its exact defining mechanism while falsifying the mapped branch; removing the mapped role or relation removes a constitutive exact-record element.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Confirmation Fatigue", "one_liner": "The interaction-design failure where a blocking confirmation prompt fires so often, and so rarely marks a truly consequential choice, that users develop an automatic dismiss reflex that discharges the prompt without reading it — leaving it syntactically present but informationally inert.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:confirmation_fatigue", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "confirmation_fatigue"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "confirmation_fatigue", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P099-C08-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent exact-record review confirms universal entailment of one complete DNF branch without a qualifier."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "No complete alarm_fatigue instance preserves its exact defining mechanism while falsifying the mapped branch; removing the mapped role or relation removes a constitutive exact-record element.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Alarm Fatigue", "one_liner": "Reframe an operator's habitual silencing of clinical alarms as the rational response to a warning channel whose predictive value has collapsed, relocating the fix from the operator's discipline to the channel's specificity.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:alarm_fatigue", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "alarm_fatigue"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "alarm_fatigue", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P099-C08-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent exact-record review confirms universal entailment of one complete DNF branch without a qualifier."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "No complete public_warning_fatigue instance preserves its exact defining mechanism while falsifying the mapped branch; removing the mapped role or relation removes a constitutive exact-record element.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Public-Warning Fatigue", "one_liner": "The emergency-communication failure in which a warning authority fires often enough, or with enough false positives, that the population habituates and discounts subsequent warnings — spending down a depletable, asymmetrically-rebuilt credibility budget.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:public_warning_fatigue", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "public_warning_fatigue"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "public_warning_fatigue", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P099-C08-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent exact-record review confirms universal entailment of one complete DNF branch without a qualifier."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "No complete test_turnaround_lag instance preserves its exact defining mechanism while falsifying the mapped branch; removing the mapped role or relation removes a constitutive exact-record element.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Test-Turnaround Lag", "one_liner": "Diagnose why a valid test still failed to help by comparing two clocks — how long the result takes to arrive against how long the decision can wait — and reading the sign of the gap: when the result clock loses, the answer returns operationally inert.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:test_turnaround_lag", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "test_turnaround_lag"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "test_turnaround_lag", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P099-C08-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent exact-record review confirms universal entailment of one complete DNF branch without a qualifier."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The signal's promised response is decoupled from actual action.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Alertness concerns receiver readiness and does not entail sender competition.", "slug": "alertness"}], "residual_id": "r:signal_value_preservation:b063_a02_c7", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b063_a02_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Louder labels can worsen devaluation by making receiver adaptation faster. In this condition set, the requirement is: Senders compete by escalating salience rather than improving diagnostic value.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Senders compete by escalating salience rather than improving diagnostic value."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Alertness concerns receiver readiness and does not entail sender competition.", "slug": "alertness"}], "normalized_requirement": "Senders compete by escalating salience rather than improving diagnostic value.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Senders compete by escalating salience rather than improving diagnostic value.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Attention, trust, or response capacity is finite.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Even accurate signals can devalue if the receiver cannot process the volume. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Attention, trust, or response capacity is finite. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Attention, trust, or response capacity is finite.", "Even accurate signals can devalue if the receiver cannot process the volume."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Attention, trust, or response capacity is finite."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 63, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-063", "ledger_sha256": "1a1ab7ab8768cc6b70cb27c4eb45116c75bd1fc82828128391064c16c8073111"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Simplification Audit", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:simplification_audit", "slug": "simplification_audit"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A simplified artifact gains usefulness by removing detail. That same removal can later become a hidden source of error. A dashboard hides caveats, a triage rule omits rare cases, a model drops variables, a policy removes context, or a process eliminates a step that had been silently protecting quality.\n\nThe structural problem is not complexity itself. The problem is unexamined omission after simplification. The system treats the simplified artifact as complete enough even though its omitted cases, assumptions, dependencies, or constraints may now affect decisions and outcomes.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A simplified representation, model, process, policy, or solution is being used as if its omissions are harmless, even though the omitted details may affect validity, fairness, safety, interpretation, or operational reliability."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Legibility makes a complex system easier to administer by simplifying it into tractable representations.", "role_mapping": "Artifact -> legible representation; speed or tractability -> simplification motive.", "slug": "legibility", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b063_a03_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use Simplification Audit when a simplified model, process, policy, interface, summary, dashboard, rubric, checklist, or solution is already being used and there is reason to suspect that omitted detail may matter. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A model, process, policy, summary, dashboard, requirement set, or design has been simplified for speed, usability, cost, or tractability.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A model, process, policy, summary, dashboard, requirement set, or design has been simplified for speed, usability, cost, or tractability.", "Use Simplification Audit when a simplified model, process, policy, interface, summary, dashboard, rubric, checklist, or solution is already being used and there is reason to suspect that omitted detail may matter."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Legibility", "one_liner": "A distant actor makes heterogeneous local reality governable by projecting it into standardized, simplified representations, gaining comparison and control while discarding context the scheme cannot see.", "page_ref": "prime:legibility", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Artifact -> legible representation; speed or tractability -> simplification motive.", "slug": "legibility", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Legibility makes a complex system easier to administer by simplifying it into tractable representations."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A model, process, policy, summary, dashboard, requirement set, or design has been simplified for speed, usability, cost, or tractability.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Legibility necessarily omits local detail and context that can matter outside the administrative view.", "role_mapping": "Removed variables or cases -> illegible local knowledge.", "slug": "legibility", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b063_a03_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A dashboard hides caveats, a triage rule omits rare cases, a model drops variables, a policy removes context, or a process eliminates a step that had been silently protecting quality. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The simplification removed variables, cases, caveats, steps, dependencies, stakeholders, or context that may matter in some uses.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The simplification removed variables, cases, caveats, steps, dependencies, stakeholders, or context that may matter in some uses.", "A dashboard hides caveats, a triage rule omits rare cases, a model drops variables, a policy removes context, or a process eliminates a step that had been silently protecting quality."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Legibility", "one_liner": "A distant actor makes heterogeneous local reality governable by projecting it into standardized, simplified representations, gaining comparison and control while discarding context the scheme cannot see.", "page_ref": "prime:legibility", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Removed variables or cases -> illegible local knowledge.", "slug": "legibility", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Legibility necessarily omits local detail and context that can matter outside the administrative view."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The simplification removed variables, cases, caveats, steps, dependencies, stakeholders, or context that may matter in some uses.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P099-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a decision actor, a simplified artifact, and decision use.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An actor uses a simplified artifact to support decisions.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail reliance on the artifact as sufficiently complete, not merely consultation of it.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The actor treats the artifact as complete enough for those decisions.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve use outside the scope for which the artifact was produced.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The decisions extend beyond the artifact’s original scope.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when users make the out-of-scope completeness judgment.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The actor is a user.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when decision-makers make the out-of-scope completeness judgment.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The actor is a decision-maker.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "An actor treats a simplified artifact as complete enough for decisions beyond its original scope.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "simplified artifact is treated as decision-complete beyond its scope", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P099-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A legible simplification can be used within its explicitly bounded scope.", "slug": "legibility"}], "residual_id": "r:simplification_audit:b063_a03_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b063_a03_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The system treats the simplified artifact as complete enough even though its omitted cases, assumptions, dependencies, or constraints may now affect decisions and outcomes. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Users or decision-makers are treating the simplified artifact as complete enough for decisions beyond its original scope.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Users or decision-makers are treating the simplified artifact as complete enough for decisions beyond its original scope.", "The system treats the simplified artifact as complete enough even though its omitted cases, assumptions, dependencies, or constraints may now affect decisions and outcomes."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "No complete fallacy_of_accident instance preserves its exact defining mechanism while falsifying the mapped branch; removing the mapped role or relation removes a constitutive exact-record element.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Fallacy of Accident", "one_liner": "The inferential mistake of applying a general rule mechanically to a case that satisfies its terms but lies outside its intended scope — treating a defeasible generalisation, carrying an implicit ceteris paribus clause, as an exceptionless universal.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:fallacy_of_accident", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "fallacy_of_accident"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "fallacy_of_accident", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P099-C09-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent exact-record review confirms universal entailment of one complete DNF branch without a qualifier."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Users or decision-makers are treating the simplified artifact as complete enough for decisions beyond its original scope.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Incidents can arise from causes unrelated to the simplification.", "slug": "legibility"}], "residual_id": "r:simplification_audit:b063_a03_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b063_a03_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The trigger may be edge-case failure, stakeholder complaint, context drift, new use, higher stakes, subgroup harm, incident patterns, or user overconfidence in a compact representation. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Incidents, complaints, edge cases, subgroup failures, confusing interpretations, or model errors suggest that simplification may be hiding a real constraint.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Incidents, complaints, edge cases, subgroup failures, confusing interpretations, or model errors suggest that simplification may be hiding a real constraint.", "The trigger may be edge-case failure, stakeholder complaint, context drift, new use, higher stakes, subgroup harm, incident patterns, or user overconfidence in a compact representation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Incidents can arise from causes unrelated to the simplification.", "slug": "legibility"}], "normalized_requirement": "Incidents, complaints, edge cases, subgroup failures, confusing interpretations, or model errors suggest that simplification may be hiding a real constraint.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Incidents, complaints, edge cases, subgroup failures, confusing interpretations, or model errors suggest that simplification may be hiding a real constraint.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The system needs to preserve useful simplicity while preventing simplification-induced harm.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The system needs simplification to remain usable, but the same omission that makes the artifact useful can also make it wrong, unfair, unsafe, or misleading in cases that matter. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: The system needs to preserve useful simplicity while preventing simplification-induced harm. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The system needs to preserve useful simplicity while preventing simplification-induced harm.", "The system needs simplification to remain usable, but the same omission that makes the artifact useful can also make it wrong, unfair, unsafe, or misleading in cases that matter."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The system needs to preserve useful simplicity while preventing simplification-induced harm."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 63, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-063", "ledger_sha256": "1a1ab7ab8768cc6b70cb27c4eb45116c75bd1fc82828128391064c16c8073111"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Site-Responsive Spatial Abstraction", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:site_responsive_spatial_abstraction", "slug": "site_responsive_spatial_abstraction"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 2, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A concept, memory, process, or representational subject needs abstraction, but a portable formal treatment would detach it from the place-specific conditions that give it force. The site has geometry, light, history, material behavior, access patterns, ecological constraints, or social meanings that should shape the abstraction, yet they are being treated as background display conditions rather than as active structure.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A concept, memory, process, or representational subject needs abstraction, but a portable formal treatment would detach it from the place-specific conditions that give it force. The site has geometry, light, history, material behavior, access patterns, ecological constraints, or social meanings that should shape the abstraction, yet they are being treated as background display conditions rather than as active structure."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P099-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the proposed work and a particular site.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A proposed work is situated in relation to a specific site.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail site-responsive shaping rather than mere physical co-location.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The proposed work responds to that specific site.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when the work responds to a specific building.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The specific site is a building.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when the work responds to a specific room.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The specific site is a room.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when the work responds to a specific landscape.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The specific site is a landscape.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when the work responds to a specific memorial site.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The specific site is a memorial site.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when the work responds to a specific public space.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The specific site is a public space.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when the work responds to a specific natural setting.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The specific site is a natural setting.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A proposed work responds to a specific site.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "proposed work is shaped in response to a specific site", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P099-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Conceptual blending can occur without a physical site.", "slug": "conceptual_blending"}], "residual_id": "r:site_responsive_spatial_abstraction:b063_a04_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b063_a04_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The same site constraints that make a work difficult—fixed geometry, changing light, weather, public use, historical burden, ecological limits, access restrictions—can become the source of its abstract power. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The proposed work responds to a specific building, room, landscape, memorial site, public space, or natural setting.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The proposed work responds to a specific building, room, landscape, memorial site, public space, or natural setting.", "The same site constraints that make a work difficult—fixed geometry, changing light, weather, public use, historical burden, ecological limits, access restrictions—can become the source of its abstract power."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "No complete adaptive_reuse instance preserves its exact defining mechanism while falsifying the mapped branch; removing the mapped role or relation removes a constitutive exact-record element.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Adaptive Reuse", "one_liner": "Retain an existing building's physical substance — structure, envelope, site, silhouette — while replacing the function it serves, fitting a new program into the inherited constraint envelope rather than designing a building around the program.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:adaptive_reuse", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "adaptive_reuse"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "adaptive_reuse", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P099-C10-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent exact-record review confirms universal entailment of one complete DNF branch without a qualifier."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "No complete placemaking instance preserves its exact defining mechanism while falsifying the mapped branch; removing the mapped role or relation removes a constitutive exact-record element.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Placemaking", "one_liner": "The urban-design discipline that transforms a physical space into a recognised place — a location residents name, return to, and weave into routine — by treating place-quality as emergent from four mutually reinforcing loops (physical form, patterns of use, collective identity, and community stewardship) rather than as a property of design alone.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:placemaking", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "placemaking"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "placemaking", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P099-C10-U1", "why_it_fits": "Independent exact-record review confirms universal entailment of one complete DNF branch without a qualifier."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The proposed work responds to a specific building, room, landscape, memorial site, public space, or natural setting.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P099-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O9"], ["O1", "O2", "O10"], ["O1", "O2", "O11"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve meaning and a contextual feature on which it can depend.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A work or experience carries meaning in a site-conditioned context.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail constitutive dependence of meaning on context, not merely co-occurrence.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The meaning depends on the contextual feature.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when meaning depends on light.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The contextual feature is light.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when meaning depends on shadow.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The contextual feature is shadow.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when meaning depends on reflection.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The contextual feature is reflection.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when meaning depends on horizon.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The contextual feature is horizon.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when meaning depends on path.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The contextual feature is path.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when meaning depends on scale.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The contextual feature is scale.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when meaning depends on threshold.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "The contextual feature is threshold.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when meaning depends on weather.", "obligation_id": "O10", "statement": "The contextual feature is weather.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when meaning depends on season.", "obligation_id": "O11", "statement": "The contextual feature is season.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Meaning depends on a site-conditioned perceptual, spatial, or temporal feature.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "meaning depends on a site-conditioned feature", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P099-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Perspective need not make weather or seasonal change constitutive of meaning.", "slug": "perspective"}], "residual_id": "r:site_responsive_spatial_abstraction:b063_a04_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b063_a04_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The same site constraints that make a work difficult—fixed geometry, changing light, weather, public use, historical burden, ecological limits, access restrictions—can become the source of its abstract power. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Meaning depends on light, shadow, reflection, horizon, path, scale, threshold, weather, or season.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Meaning depends on light, shadow, reflection, horizon, path, scale, threshold, weather, or season.", "The same site constraints that make a work difficult—fixed geometry, changing light, weather, public use, historical burden, ecological limits, access restrictions—can become the source of its abstract power."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_SYNTHESIS", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Without the guard, a complete chronotope instance can select another candidate-named presentation or feature value and miss the source branch; with the guard, that counterexample is excluded without changing principal roles or relation.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Chronotope", "one_liner": "Read the coupling of a narrative's time-pattern and space-pattern as an admissibility structure that determines which events, encounters, and protagonists can take shape inside it, rather than as separable descriptive settings.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:chronotope", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O9"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "chronotope_threshold_spatial_register", "predicate": "The chronotope's spatial register is a threshold at the work's site.", "rationale": "The candidate supplies the principal roles and relation; one atomic, candidate-anchored context fact fills exactly the remaining branch obligation without restating the head."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "chronotope"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "chronotope_threshold_spatial_register"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "chronotope", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P099-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "The candidate directly supplies the structural spine, while one atomic candidate-anchored context predicate fills every remaining obligation in one complete DNF branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_SYNTHESIS", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Without the guard, a complete placemaking instance can select another candidate-named presentation or feature value and miss the source branch; with the guard, that counterexample is excluded without changing principal roles or relation.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Placemaking", "one_liner": "The urban-design discipline that transforms a physical space into a recognised place — a location residents name, return to, and weave into routine — by treating place-quality as emergent from four mutually reinforcing loops (physical form, patterns of use, collective identity, and community stewardship) rather than as a property of design alone.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:placemaking", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O8"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "placemaking_scale_site_feature", "predicate": "Scale is a load-bearing physical-form feature of the place experience.", "rationale": "The candidate supplies the principal roles and relation; one atomic, candidate-anchored context fact fills exactly the remaining branch obligation without restating the head."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "placemaking"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "placemaking_scale_site_feature"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "placemaking", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P099-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "The candidate directly supplies the structural spine, while one atomic candidate-anchored context predicate fills every remaining obligation in one complete DNF branch."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Meaning depends on light, shadow, reflection, horizon, path, scale, threshold, weather, or season.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Abstract art can be chosen without literal representation being intrusive or reductive.", "slug": "abstraction_in_art"}], "residual_id": "r:site_responsive_spatial_abstraction:b063_a04_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b063_a04_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Literal representation would be too didactic, intrusive, reductive, or incompatible with the site. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Literal representation would be too didactic, intrusive, reductive, or incompatible with the site."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Abstract art can be chosen without literal representation being intrusive or reductive.", "slug": "abstraction_in_art"}], "normalized_requirement": "Literal representation would be too didactic, intrusive, reductive, or incompatible with the site.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Literal representation would be too didactic, intrusive, reductive, or incompatible with the site.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P099-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a work and transfer between distinct sites.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A work can be moved from one site to another.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve lossless transfer rather than degradation caused by moving.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The move can occur without loss to the work.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail lossless site transfer as the condition under which the adverse character can arise.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Lossless transfer can make the work decorative or generic.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the possibility qualifier.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The adverse character is possible rather than inevitable.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by possible decorative character.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The work can become decorative.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by possible generic character.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The work can become generic.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A work could become decorative or generic if it could be moved between sites without loss.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "lossless site transfer can render a work decorative or generic", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P099-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An abstract work can remain meaningful after relocation.", "slug": "abstract_work"}], "residual_id": "r:site_responsive_spatial_abstraction:b063_a04_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b063_a04_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The same site constraints that make a work difficult—fixed geometry, changing light, weather, public use, historical burden, ecological limits, access restrictions—can become the source of its abstract power. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A work could become decorative or generic if moved from one site to another without loss.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A work could become decorative or generic if moved from one site to another without loss.", "The same site constraints that make a work difficult—fixed geometry, changing light, weather, public use, historical burden, ecological limits, access restrictions—can become the source of its abstract power."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An abstract work can remain meaningful after relocation.", "slug": "abstract_work"}], "normalized_requirement": "A work could become decorative or generic if moved from one site to another without loss.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A work could become decorative or generic if moved from one site to another without loss.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P099-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a viewer, a work, and the viewer’s situated condition.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A viewer perceives a work through a situated bodily or spatial condition.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail the condition as a cause of perceptual change.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The viewer’s situated condition changes how the work is perceived.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when the viewer’s route changes perception.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The changing condition is the viewer’s route.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when the viewer’s bodily scale changes perception.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The changing condition is the viewer’s bodily scale.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when the viewer’s sightline changes perception.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The changing condition is the viewer’s sightline.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when the viewer’s approach changes perception.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The changing condition is the viewer’s approach.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A viewer’s situated bodily or spatial condition changes how a work is perceived.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "viewer situation changes perception of a work", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P099-C13-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Composition can be perceived from a fixed viewpoint.", "slug": "composition"}], "residual_id": "r:site_responsive_spatial_abstraction:b063_a04_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b063_a04_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The viewer’s route, bodily scale, sightline, or approach changes how the work is perceived. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The viewer’s route, bodily scale, sightline, or approach changes how the work is perceived."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Composition can be perceived from a fixed viewpoint.", "slug": "composition"}], "normalized_requirement": "The viewer’s route, bodily scale, sightline, or approach changes how the work is perceived.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The viewer’s route, bodily scale, sightline, or approach changes how the work is perceived.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The site carries contested, sacred, ecological, historical, or community meaning.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The same site constraints that make a work difficult—fixed geometry, changing light, weather, public use, historical burden, ecological limits, access restrictions—can become the source of its abstract power. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The site carries contested, sacred, ecological, historical, or community meaning. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The site carries contested, sacred, ecological, historical, or community meaning.", "The same site constraints that make a work difficult—fixed geometry, changing light, weather, public use, historical burden, ecological limits, access restrictions—can become the source of its abstract power."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The site carries contested, sacred, ecological, historical, or community meaning."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 63, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-063", "ledger_sha256": "1a1ab7ab8768cc6b70cb27c4eb45116c75bd1fc82828128391064c16c8073111"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Situational Attribution Check", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:situational_attribution_check", "slug": "situational_attribution_check"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a mismatch between what observers can easily see and what they need to know. Observers see the behavior: someone missed a commitment, broke a rule, made an error, acted defensively, failed to speak up, or produced poor work. They often do not see the constraints, incentives, ambiguity, information gaps, tools, dependencies, or pressures surrounding that behavior.\n\nBecause the situation is less visible than the behavior, the mind supplies a trait explanation. The person was careless. The team was lazy. The customer was irrational. The subordinate was disrespectful. The operator was incompetent. Once that explanation hardens, response options narrow toward blame, punishment, avoidance, or moral judgment, and the system loses the chance to learn what actually made the behavior likely.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A person or group explains another actor's behavior primarily through stable traits, motives, competence, or character while underweighting constraints, incentives, information asymmetries, role conditions, tools, norms, and system design that may have shaped the behavior."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The error is precisely the rapid overassignment of behavior to stable personal traits.", "role_mapping": "Trait explanation -> dispositional attribution.", "slug": "fundamental_attribution_error", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b063_a05_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Because the situation is less visible than the behavior, the mind supplies a trait explanation. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A trait explanation arrives quickly.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A trait explanation arrives quickly.", "Because the situation is less visible than the behavior, the mind supplies a trait explanation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Fundamental Attribution Error", "one_liner": "Misattribute causes.", "page_ref": "prime:fundamental_attribution_error", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Trait explanation -> dispositional attribution.", "slug": "fundamental_attribution_error", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The error is precisely the rapid overassignment of behavior to stable personal traits."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A trait explanation arrives quickly.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Observers commit the error because situational constraints are less visible than the actor's behavior.", "role_mapping": "Hidden situation -> underweighted context.", "slug": "fundamental_attribution_error", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b063_a05_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially valuable when the observer has only partial access to workload, tools, incentives, role clarity, history, social pressure, time constraints, or information available to the actor. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The observer lacks full access to the actor's situation.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The observer lacks full access to the actor's situation.", "It is especially valuable when the observer has only partial access to workload, tools, incentives, role clarity, history, social pressure, time constraints, or information available to the actor."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Fundamental Attribution Error", "one_liner": "Misattribute causes.", "page_ref": "prime:fundamental_attribution_error", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Hidden situation -> underweighted context.", "slug": "fundamental_attribution_error", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Observers commit the error because situational constraints are less visible than the actor's behavior."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The observer lacks full access to the actor's situation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires plausible situational causes that are underweighted relative to traits.", "role_mapping": "Environment -> situational cause; choices -> observed behavior.", "slug": "fundamental_attribution_error", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b063_a05_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Responsibility requires taking behavior seriously, but fair and effective response requires explaining behavior in the choice environment where it occurred. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The environment plausibly shaped available choices.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The environment plausibly shaped available choices.", "Responsibility requires taking behavior seriously, but fair and effective response requires explaining behavior in the choice environment where it occurred."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Fundamental Attribution Error", "one_liner": "Misattribute causes.", "page_ref": "prime:fundamental_attribution_error", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Environment -> situational cause; choices -> observed behavior.", "slug": "fundamental_attribution_error", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires plausible situational causes that are underweighted relative to traits."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The environment plausibly shaped available choices.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A behavior has visible consequences.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Because the situation is less visible than the behavior, the mind supplies a trait explanation. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: A behavior has visible consequences. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A behavior has visible consequences.", "Because the situation is less visible than the behavior, the mind supplies a trait explanation."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "A behavior has visible consequences."}, {"display_text": "The response will matter.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The response will matter. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The response will matter."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The response will matter."}, {"display_text": "Group or status dynamics make blame easy.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Group or status dynamics make blame easy. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Group or status dynamics make blame easy."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Group or status dynamics make blame easy."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 63, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-063", "ledger_sha256": "1a1ab7ab8768cc6b70cb27c4eb45116c75bd1fc82828128391064c16c8073111"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Skin-in-the-Game Alignment", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:skin_in_the_game_alignment", "slug": "skin_in_the_game_alignment"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is an **exposure gap**. One actor can influence a risky outcome, but the harm falls elsewhere: on customers, patients, investors, taxpayers, workers, communities, shared pools, public budgets, or future maintainers. The actor may receive fees, status, speed, power, or convenience while remaining detached from loss.\n\nThis produces both an incentive problem and a legitimacy problem. Incentively, detached actors may take risks they would reject if they bore more downside. Legitimately, affected parties may distrust decisions made by people who do not appear to live with the results.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "An actor has authority, influence, expertise, or upside access over a risky outcome, but the main downside falls on other people, shared pools, institutions, or future maintainers."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Moral hazard requires an actor whose choices alter risk after some protection or delegation.", "role_mapping": "Actor -> protected decision maker; downstream risk -> affected outcome.", "slug": "moral_hazard", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b063_a06_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The design challenge is to restore consequence sharing without destroying useful risk pooling, specialization, or legitimate protection. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The actor can make, approve, advise, design, sell, allocate, insure, or operate in a way that changes downstream risk.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The actor can make, approve, advise, design, sell, allocate, insure, or operate in a way that changes downstream risk.", "The design challenge is to restore consequence sharing without destroying useful risk pooling, specialization, or legitimate protection."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Moral Hazard", "one_liner": "Risk-taking under protection.", "page_ref": "prime:moral_hazard", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Actor -> protected decision maker; downstream risk -> affected outcome.", "slug": "moral_hazard", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Moral hazard requires an actor whose choices alter risk after some protection or delegation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The actor can make, approve, advise, design, sell, allocate, insure, or operate in a way that changes downstream risk.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime necessarily shifts part of the downside from the risk-taking actor to another bearer.", "role_mapping": "Stakeholders -> risk bearers; shifted downside -> externalized loss.", "slug": "moral_hazard", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b063_a06_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "One actor can influence a risky outcome, but the harm falls elsewhere: on customers, patients, investors, taxpayers, workers, communities, shared pools, public budgets, or future maintainers. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Downside is shifted to users, clients, patients, investors, communities, public budgets, risk pools, future maintainers, or other stakeholders.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Downside is shifted to users, clients, patients, investors, communities, public budgets, risk pools, future maintainers, or other stakeholders.", "One actor can influence a risky outcome, but the harm falls elsewhere: on customers, patients, investors, taxpayers, workers, communities, shared pools, public budgets, or future maintainers."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Moral Hazard", "one_liner": "Risk-taking under protection.", "page_ref": "prime:moral_hazard", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Stakeholders -> risk bearers; shifted downside -> externalized loss.", "slug": "moral_hazard", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime necessarily shifts part of the downside from the risk-taking actor to another bearer."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Downside is shifted to users, clients, patients, investors, communities, public budgets, risk pools, future maintainers, or other stakeholders.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Insulation from consequences weakens the actor's incentive to exercise disciplined judgment.", "role_mapping": "Low exposure -> protection; judgment -> behavior under incentive.", "slug": "moral_hazard", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b063_a06_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The design challenge is to restore consequence sharing without destroying useful risk pooling, specialization, or legitimate protection. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The current design leaves the actor with too little consequence exposure to discipline judgment.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The current design leaves the actor with too little consequence exposure to discipline judgment.", "The design challenge is to restore consequence sharing without destroying useful risk pooling, specialization, or legitimate protection."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Moral Hazard", "one_liner": "Risk-taking under protection.", "page_ref": "prime:moral_hazard", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Low exposure -> protection; judgment -> behavior under incentive.", "slug": "moral_hazard", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Insulation from consequences weakens the actor's incentive to exercise disciplined judgment."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The current design leaves the actor with too little consequence exposure to discipline judgment.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The actor can capture upside, fees, status, convenience, speed, power, or strategic benefit from the decision.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The actor may receive fees, status, speed, power, or convenience while remaining detached from loss. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The actor can capture upside, fees, status, convenience, speed, power, or strategic benefit from the decision. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The actor can capture upside, fees, status, convenience, speed, power, or strategic benefit from the decision.", "The actor may receive fees, status, speed, power, or convenience while remaining detached from loss."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "The actor can capture upside, fees, status, convenience, speed, power, or strategic benefit from the decision."}, {"display_text": "It is possible to define a fair connection between controllable decisions and at least some downstream consequences.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when the actor can exit before consequences mature, when affected stakeholders distrust detached decision-makers, or when monitoring reveals problems but does not make those problems matter to the decision-maker. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: It is possible to define a fair connection between controllable decisions and at least some downstream consequences. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["It is possible to define a fair connection between controllable decisions and at least some downstream consequences.", "It is especially useful when the actor can exit before consequences mature, when affected stakeholders distrust detached decision-makers, or when monitoring reveals problems but does not make those problems matter to the decision-maker."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "It is possible to define a fair connection between controllable decisions and at least some downstream consequences."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 63, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-063", "ledger_sha256": "1a1ab7ab8768cc6b70cb27c4eb45116c75bd1fc82828128391064c16c8073111"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Slack Capacity Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:slack_capacity_design", "slug": "slack_capacity_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 2, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is full-utilization fragility. A system that treats every unused unit of capacity as waste may look efficient during stable periods, but it loses the ability to absorb variation or change itself. Every unexpected event becomes a crisis because there is no headroom. Every improvement becomes extra work because there is no protected learning capacity. Every recovery need becomes invisible because the schedule assumes people and infrastructure can run indefinitely at maximum load.\n\nThe deeper tension is that the value of slack is often invisible until it is needed. The cost of slack is visible every day as unused time, unused money, or unused capacity. The cost of no slack appears later as outages, burnout, missed opportunities, failed projects, deferred maintenance, low learning, and brittle plans. Slack Capacity Design makes that latent tradeoff explicit.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "All resources are committed to current work, leaving no capacity for disruption, improvement, recovery, learning, or unexpected opportunity."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "System slack entails available buffer, the inverse of chronic full utilization.", "slug": "system_slack"}], "residual_id": "r:slack_capacity_design:b063_a07_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b063_a07_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The structural problem is full-utilization fragility. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Chronic full utilization.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Chronic full utilization", "The structural problem is full-utilization fragility."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "System slack entails available buffer, the inverse of chronic full utilization.", "slug": "system_slack"}], "normalized_requirement": "Chronic full utilization", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Chronic full utilization", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P099-C14", "dnf": [], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [], "predicate": "Firefighting recurs.", "resolution": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RESIDUAL", "semantic_scope": "NON_ABSTRACTION", "structural_head": "firefighting recurs", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P099-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Adaptive capacity can be used proactively without recurring firefighting.", "slug": "adaptive_capacity"}], "residual_id": "r:slack_capacity_design:b063_a07_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b063_a07_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Recurring firefighting. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Recurring firefighting"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RECLASSIFIED", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 1, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Adaptive capacity can be used proactively without recurring firefighting.", "slug": "adaptive_capacity"}], "normalized_requirement": "Recurring firefighting", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RECLASSIFIED", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later candidate-blind atomization classified this remainder as a threshold, parameter, materiality test, or other non-abstraction rather than a catalog gap."}, "predicate": "Recurring firefighting", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P099-C15", "dnf": [], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [], "predicate": "Learning is always postponed.", "resolution": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RESIDUAL", "semantic_scope": "NON_ABSTRACTION", "structural_head": "learning is recurrently postponed", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P099-C15-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P099-C15", "dnf": [], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [], "predicate": "Improvement is always postponed.", "resolution": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RESIDUAL", "semantic_scope": "NON_ABSTRACTION", "structural_head": "improvement is recurrently postponed", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P099-C15-U2"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Adaptive capacity can exist while learning proceeds normally.", "slug": "adaptive_capacity"}], "residual_id": "r:slack_capacity_design:b063_a07_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b063_a07_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Every improvement becomes extra work because there is no protected learning capacity. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Learning and improvement are always postponed.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Learning and improvement are always postponed", "Every improvement becomes extra work because there is no protected learning capacity."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RECLASSIFIED", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 2, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Adaptive capacity can exist while learning proceeds normally.", "slug": "adaptive_capacity"}], "normalized_requirement": "Learning and improvement are always postponed", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RECLASSIFIED", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later candidate-blind atomization classified this remainder as a threshold, parameter, materiality test, or other non-abstraction rather than a catalog gap."}, "predicate": "Learning and improvement are always postponed", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P100-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve current delivery demand as the pressure-bearing role.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Current delivery demands exert pressure on available work capacity.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail that delivery pressure causes innovation capacity or activity to be crowded out.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Delivery pressure displaces or prevents innovation activity.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Delivery pressure crowds out innovation.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "delivery pressure crowds out innovation", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P100-C01-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "System slack can be reserved for recovery rather than innovation.", "slug": "system_slack"}], "residual_id": "r:slack_capacity_design:b063_a07_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b063_a07_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Efficiency pressure pushes resources toward full utilization, while resilience, learning, adaptation, recovery, and innovation require usable headroom. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Innovation is crowded out by delivery pressure.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Innovation is crowded out by delivery pressure", "Efficiency pressure pushes resources toward full utilization, while resilience, learning, adaptation, recovery, and innovation require usable headroom."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A team with protected discovery capacity and no displacement of learning would fail the exact calendar-mis-setting required by the build trap.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Build Trap", "one_liner": "Diagnose a team that ships at high velocity yet moves no business outcome — because its measurement, calendar, and incentives are all set to what was built rather than to whether it mattered — by reading those three dials and asking what outcome the team owns.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:build_trap", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "build_trap"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "build_trap", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P100-C01-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every complete build-trap instance requires delivery work to crowd discovery, research, instrumentation, and reconsideration out of finite team capacity."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Innovation is crowded out by delivery pressure", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Cognitive resource depletion necessarily leaves people with reduced recovery and decision capacity.", "role_mapping": "Human recovery capacity -> depleted cognitive resource.", "slug": "cognitive_resource_depletion", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b063_a07_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "All resources are committed to current work, leaving no capacity for disruption, improvement, recovery, learning, or unexpected opportunity. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Human recovery capacity is depleted.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Human recovery capacity is depleted", "All resources are committed to current work, leaving no capacity for disruption, improvement, recovery, learning, or unexpected opportunity."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Cognitive Resource Depletion", "one_liner": "Cognitive capacity degrades from sustained resource consumption.", "page_ref": "prime:cognitive_resource_depletion", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Human recovery capacity -> depleted cognitive resource.", "slug": "cognitive_resource_depletion", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Cognitive resource depletion necessarily leaves people with reduced recovery and decision capacity."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Human recovery capacity is depleted", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Reserve exists but is not governed.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Slack only becomes this archetype when the reserve is explicitly tied to a purpose and governed through protection, release, replenishment, visibility, and review. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Reserve exists but is not governed. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Reserve exists but is not governed", "Slack only becomes this archetype when the reserve is explicitly tied to a purpose and governed through protection, release, replenishment, visibility, and review."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Reserve exists but is not governed"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 63, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-063", "ledger_sha256": "1a1ab7ab8768cc6b70cb27c4eb45116c75bd1fc82828128391064c16c8073111"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Sliding-Kernel Local Transformation Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:sliding_kernel_local_transformation_design", "slug": "sliding_kernel_local_transformation_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 6, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 6, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "6 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system needs to transform an ordered field, sequence, map, grid, image, signal, text window, or feature surface, but each output position depends on nearby context rather than a single point or a global summary. If designers use arbitrary local heuristics, disconnected pointwise rules, or blunt aggregation, the output becomes incomparable, too noisy, too blurry, too brittle at edges, or falsely interpreted as raw evidence.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system needs to transform an ordered field, sequence, map, grid, image, signal, text window, or feature surface, but each output position depends on nearby context rather than a single point or a global summary. If designers use arbitrary local heuristics, disconnected pointwise rules, or blunt aggregation, the output becomes incomparable, too noisy, too blurry, too brittle at edges, or falsely interpreted as raw evidence."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Convolution computes each output from a local neighborhood in a structured input.", "role_mapping": "Neighborhood -> kernel support; output -> transformed position.", "slug": "convolution", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b063_a08_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Local context improves fidelity and extractive power, but any fixed local mixture also imposes a scale, neighborhood, weighting pattern, and boundary convention that can blur, fabricate, or hide structure. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The source has local continuity, adjacency, neighborhood structure, or repeated motifs that should influence each output.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The source has local continuity, adjacency, neighborhood structure, or repeated motifs that should influence each output.", "Local context improves fidelity and extractive power, but any fixed local mixture also imposes a scale, neighborhood, weighting pattern, and boundary convention that can blur, fabricate, or hide structure."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Convolution", "one_liner": "Each output is a sliding, weighted local mixture of an input produced by one fixed kernel.", "page_ref": "prime:convolution", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Neighborhood -> kernel support; output -> transformed position.", "slug": "convolution", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Convolution computes each output from a local neighborhood in a structured input."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The source has local continuity, adjacency, neighborhood structure, or repeated motifs that should influence each output.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Convolution preserves position while incorporating nearby context, unlike pointwise or global aggregation.", "role_mapping": "Nearby context -> local support; position -> output index.", "slug": "convolution", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b063_a08_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system needs to transform an ordered field, sequence, map, grid, image, signal, text window, or feature surface, but each output position depends on nearby context rather than a single point or a global summary. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A pointwise transformation ignores useful nearby context, while global aggregation destroys position, edge, or feature information.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A pointwise transformation ignores useful nearby context, while global aggregation destroys position, edge, or feature information.", "A system needs to transform an ordered field, sequence, map, grid, image, signal, text window, or feature surface, but each output position depends on nearby context rather than a single point or a global summary."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Convolution", "one_liner": "Each output is a sliding, weighted local mixture of an input produced by one fixed kernel.", "page_ref": "prime:convolution", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Nearby context -> local support; position -> output index.", "slug": "convolution", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Convolution preserves position while incorporating nearby context, unlike pointwise or global aggregation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A pointwise transformation ignores useful nearby context, while global aggregation destroys position, edge, or feature information.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The defining weight-sharing property applies the same local operator across positions.", "role_mapping": "Same transformation -> kernel; positions -> translations.", "slug": "convolution", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b063_a08_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "If designers use arbitrary local heuristics, disconnected pointwise rules, or blunt aggregation, the output becomes incomparable, too noisy, too blurry, too brittle at edges, or falsely interpreted as raw evidence. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The same local transformation should apply across many positions so outputs remain comparable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The same local transformation should apply across many positions so outputs remain comparable.", "If designers use arbitrary local heuristics, disconnected pointwise rules, or blunt aggregation, the output becomes incomparable, too noisy, too blurry, too brittle at edges, or falsely interpreted as raw evidence."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Convolution", "one_liner": "Each output is a sliding, weighted local mixture of an input produced by one fixed kernel.", "page_ref": "prime:convolution", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Same transformation -> kernel; positions -> translations.", "slug": "convolution", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The defining weight-sharing property applies the same local operator across positions."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The same local transformation should apply across many positions so outputs remain comparable.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Smoothing, edge detection, and local feature extraction are direct convolutional operations.", "role_mapping": "Requested operation -> kernel response.", "slug": "convolution", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b063_a08_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The system needs smoothing, edge detection, local scoring, feature extraction, finite-difference update, or structured preprocessing. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The system needs smoothing, edge detection, local scoring, feature extraction, finite-difference update, or structured preprocessing."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Convolution", "one_liner": "Each output is a sliding, weighted local mixture of an input produced by one fixed kernel.", "page_ref": "prime:convolution", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Requested operation -> kernel response.", "slug": "convolution", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Smoothing, edge detection, and local feature extraction are direct convolutional operations."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The system needs smoothing, edge detection, local scoring, feature extraction, finite-difference update, or structured preprocessing.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "An explicit kernel exposes exactly how neighboring values contribute to each output.", "role_mapping": "Neighbor evidence -> kernel weights; output -> weighted sum.", "slug": "convolution", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b063_a08_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "If designers use arbitrary local heuristics, disconnected pointwise rules, or blunt aggregation, the output becomes incomparable, too noisy, too blurry, too brittle at edges, or falsely interpreted as raw evidence. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Downstream interpretation requires knowing exactly how much neighboring evidence contributed to each output.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Downstream interpretation requires knowing exactly how much neighboring evidence contributed to each output.", "If designers use arbitrary local heuristics, disconnected pointwise rules, or blunt aggregation, the output becomes incomparable, too noisy, too blurry, too brittle at edges, or falsely interpreted as raw evidence."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Convolution", "one_liner": "Each output is a sliding, weighted local mixture of an input produced by one fixed kernel.", "page_ref": "prime:convolution", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Neighbor evidence -> kernel weights; output -> weighted sum.", "slug": "convolution", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "An explicit kernel exposes exactly how neighboring values contribute to each output."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Downstream interpretation requires knowing exactly how much neighboring evidence contributed to each output.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Padding, window size, stride, and gain alter a discrete convolution's result.", "role_mapping": "Boundary and step parameters -> operator definition.", "slug": "convolution", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b063_a08_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Boundary cases, padding, window size, stride, or gain can materially change the result. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Boundary cases, padding, window size, stride, or gain can materially change the result."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Convolution", "one_liner": "Each output is a sliding, weighted local mixture of an input produced by one fixed kernel.", "page_ref": "prime:convolution", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Boundary and step parameters -> operator definition.", "slug": "convolution", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Padding, window size, stride, and gain alter a discrete convolution's result."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Boundary cases, padding, window size, stride, or gain can materially change the result.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A learned or hand-designed local pattern may impose artifacts if not validated against test inputs.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Local context improves fidelity and extractive power, but any fixed local mixture also imposes a scale, neighborhood, weighting pattern, and boundary convention that can blur, fabricate, or hide structure. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: A learned or hand-designed local pattern may impose artifacts if not validated against test inputs. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A learned or hand-designed local pattern may impose artifacts if not validated against test inputs.", "Local context improves fidelity and extractive power, but any fixed local mixture also imposes a scale, neighborhood, weighting pattern, and boundary convention that can blur, fabricate, or hide structure."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "A learned or hand-designed local pattern may impose artifacts if not validated against test inputs."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 63, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-063", "ledger_sha256": "1a1ab7ab8768cc6b70cb27c4eb45116c75bd1fc82828128391064c16c8073111"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Slot-Template Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:slot_template_design", "slug": "slot_template_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The problem is a tension between stability and variation. A recurring composition has enough shared structure to deserve reuse, but enough contextual variation that a single fixed instance is too rigid. Without an explicit slot-template, users either rebuild from scratch, copy a previous instance and edit blindly, or improvise substitutions that may break hidden invariants.\n\nCommon symptoms include inconsistent outputs, invalid option combinations, missing required fields, local adaptations that undermine central intent, and downstream reviewers having to reconstruct what the instance was supposed to preserve.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A recurring composition needs both stability and variation, but changing elements currently requires redesigning the whole, improvising ad hoc variants, or copying a prior instance and editing it without knowing which parts are safe to change."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Template instantiation requires many instances with shared structure and variable slot content.", "role_mapping": "Shared structure -> template; differences -> slot values.", "slug": "template_instantiation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b063_a09_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when repeated instances share a recognizable scaffold but need bounded variation. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Many instances share a recognizable structure but differ in content, options, participants, examples, modules, clauses, or local parameters.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Many instances share a recognizable structure but differ in content, options, participants, examples, modules, clauses, or local parameters.", "Use this archetype when repeated instances share a recognizable scaffold but need bounded variation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Template Instantiation", "one_liner": "Reuse an invariant frame of typed slots by binding variable payloads into it, producing comparable instances while exposing slot-fit failures and frame drift.", "page_ref": "prime:template_instantiation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Shared structure -> template; differences -> slot values.", "slug": "template_instantiation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Template instantiation requires many instances with shared structure and variable slot content."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Many instances share a recognizable structure but differ in content, options, participants, examples, modules, clauses, or local parameters.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A template distinguishes valid slot substitution from changing the scaffold itself.", "role_mapping": "Customization -> slot value; redesign -> template change.", "slug": "template_instantiation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b063_a09_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The structural move is deliberate: define the invariant scaffold, identify variable slots, specify valid fills, and check compatibility across chosen fills. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Users need customization but lack a clear boundary between valid variation and structural redesign.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Users need customization but lack a clear boundary between valid variation and structural redesign.", "The structural move is deliberate: define the invariant scaffold, identify variable slots, specify valid fills, and check compatibility across chosen fills."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Template Instantiation", "one_liner": "Reuse an invariant frame of typed slots by binding variable payloads into it, producing comparable instances while exposing slot-fit failures and frame drift.", "page_ref": "prime:template_instantiation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Customization -> slot value; redesign -> template change.", "slug": "template_instantiation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A template distinguishes valid slot substitution from changing the scaffold itself."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Users need customization but lack a clear boundary between valid variation and structural redesign.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Reusing the template avoids reconstructing the same scaffold for every instance.", "role_mapping": "Repeated scaffold -> template; new instance -> instantiation.", "slug": "template_instantiation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b063_a09_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when repeated instances share a recognizable scaffold but need bounded variation. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Repeated work is slowed by rebuilding the same scaffold from scratch.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Repeated work is slowed by rebuilding the same scaffold from scratch.", "Use this archetype when repeated instances share a recognizable scaffold but need bounded variation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Template Instantiation", "one_liner": "Reuse an invariant frame of typed slots by binding variable payloads into it, producing comparable instances while exposing slot-fit failures and frame drift.", "page_ref": "prime:template_instantiation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Repeated scaffold -> template; new instance -> instantiation.", "slug": "template_instantiation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Reusing the template avoids reconstructing the same scaffold for every instance."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Repeated work is slowed by rebuilding the same scaffold from scratch.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Valid template instantiation need not produce incompatibility or drift.", "slug": "template_instantiation"}], "residual_id": "r:slot_template_design:b063_a09_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b063_a09_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when copying prior examples has become risky because users do not know which parts are safe to change, or when local adaptation is desirable but inconsistent variants are creating review, safety, support, or quality problems. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Substitutions are causing hidden incompatibilities, broken meaning, safety problems, or quality drift.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Substitutions are causing hidden incompatibilities, broken meaning, safety problems, or quality drift.", "It is especially useful when copying prior examples has become risky because users do not know which parts are safe to change, or when local adaptation is desirable but inconsistent variants are creating review, safety, support, or quality problems."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Valid template instantiation need not produce incompatibility or drift.", "slug": "template_instantiation"}], "normalized_requirement": "Substitutions are causing hidden incompatibilities, broken meaning, safety problems, or quality drift.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Substitutions are causing hidden incompatibilities, broken meaning, safety problems, or quality drift.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A team wants to decentralize adaptation without losing central coherence.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Common symptoms include inconsistent outputs, invalid option combinations, missing required fields, local adaptations that undermine central intent, and downstream reviewers having to reconstruct what the instance was supposed to preserve. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: A team wants to decentralize adaptation without losing central coherence. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A team wants to decentralize adaptation without losing central coherence.", "Common symptoms include inconsistent outputs, invalid option combinations, missing required fields, local adaptations that undermine central intent, and downstream reviewers having to reconstruct what the instance was supposed to preserve."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "A team wants to decentralize adaptation without losing central coherence."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 63, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-063", "ledger_sha256": "1a1ab7ab8768cc6b70cb27c4eb45116c75bd1fc82828128391064c16c8073111"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Social Capital Activation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:social_capital_activation", "slug": "social_capital_activation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 1, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 4 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is latent relational capacity without reliable activation. People may know one another, share history, or belong to overlapping communities, but those ties are not organized into a dependable route for action. Alternatively, ties may be active only inside a subgroup, leaving outsiders, newcomers, or less powerful participants disconnected.\n\nThis problem often appears as a mismatch between where resources are and where trust is. An institution may control funding, information, or authority, while a community holds legitimacy and situated knowledge. A technical team may understand a product, while frontline staff understand the recurring user problem. A crisis response system may have supplies, while residents rely on neighborhood networks to know what is safe, current, and usable.\n\nThe archetype responds by treating social relations as a structure that can be diagnosed and designed around, while recognizing that trust cannot be commanded or spent carelessly.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A group has potential relational resources, but trust, reciprocity, or network access is insufficiently mobilized for cooperation. Useful ties exist, yet they remain latent, uneven, undocumented, mistrusted, overloaded, or disconnected from concrete resource flows."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P100-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve cooperation as a required collective action rather than an optional benefit.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Cooperation among actors is needed.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail failure of formal authority to compel the required cooperation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Formal authority cannot compel that cooperation.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Formal authority cannot compel the needed cooperation.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "formal authority cannot compel required cooperation", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P100-C02-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Social capital can complement effective formal authority.", "slug": "social_capital"}], "residual_id": "r:social_capital_activation:b063_a10_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b063_a10_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when cooperation depends on relationships rather than only on rules, incentives, or formal authority. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Formal authority cannot compel the needed cooperation.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Formal authority cannot compel the needed cooperation.", "Use this archetype when cooperation depends on relationships rather than only on rules, incentives, or formal authority."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Social capital can complement effective formal authority.", "slug": "social_capital"}], "normalized_requirement": "Formal authority cannot compel the needed cooperation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Formal authority cannot compel the needed cooperation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Social capital can be abundant rather than blocked.", "slug": "social_capital"}], "residual_id": "r:social_capital_activation:b063_a10_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b063_a10_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A group has potential relational resources, but trust, reciprocity, or network access is insufficiently mobilized for cooperation. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Resources are available but blocked by weak access or mistrust.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Resources are available but blocked by weak access or mistrust.", "A group has potential relational resources, but trust, reciprocity, or network access is insufficiently mobilized for cooperation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Social capital can be abundant rather than blocked.", "slug": "social_capital"}], "normalized_requirement": "Resources are available but blocked by weak access or mistrust.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Resources are available but blocked by weak access or mistrust.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P100-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve plural group roles and a boundary between their operational or social positions.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "At least two groups occupy positions separated by a boundary.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail required cross-boundary coordination rather than merely coexisting groups.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The groups need to coordinate across that boundary.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Groups need to coordinate across boundaries.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "groups require cross-boundary coordination", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P100-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Social capital can operate within one cohesive group.", "slug": "social_capital"}], "residual_id": "r:social_capital_activation:b063_a10_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b063_a10_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially relevant when actors say they do not know whom to ask, when official channels exist but are distrusted or slow, when resources are available but fail to reach the people who need them, or when groups need to coordinate across social, organizational, cultural, or institutional boundaries. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Groups need to coordinate across boundaries.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Groups need to coordinate across boundaries.", "It is especially relevant when actors say they do not know whom to ask, when official channels exist but are distrusted or slow, when resources are available but fail to reach the people who need them, or when groups need to coordinate across social, organizational, cultural, or institutional boundaries."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_GUARDED_EQUIVALENT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "An individual-to-individual handoff fails the guard; with both roles bound to groups, the transfer relation necessarily requires coordination across their boundary.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Handoff Loss", "one_liner": "Locate post-transition failures at the transfer relation itself: work crossing a boundary between actors arrives degraded because a bounded artifact cannot carry the sender's tacit state, so downstream decisions run on an impoverished reconstruction.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:handoff_loss", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "handoff_actors_are_operational_groups", "predicate": "The sending and receiving handoff actors are operational groups.", "rationale": "The exact record and emitted guarded expression necessarily satisfy one complete DNF branch; the qualifier is atomic, anchored, and non-laundering."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "handoff_loss"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "handoff_actors_are_operational_groups"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "handoff_loss", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P100-C03-U1", "why_it_fits": "Both readers' guards express the same atomic actor-pair restriction; the authoritative guard uses one canonical context predicate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Groups need to coordinate across boundaries.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P100-C04", "dnf": [], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [], "predicate": "Repeated collaboration is needed.", "resolution": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RESIDUAL", "semantic_scope": "NON_ABSTRACTION", "structural_head": "collaboration is repeatedly required", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P100-C04-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A one-time mobilization can use social capital.", "slug": "social_capital"}], "residual_id": "r:social_capital_activation:b063_a10_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b063_a10_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Repeated collaboration is needed. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Repeated collaboration is needed."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RECLASSIFIED", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 1, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A one-time mobilization can use social capital.", "slug": "social_capital"}], "normalized_requirement": "Repeated collaboration is needed.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RECLASSIFIED", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later candidate-blind atomization classified this remainder as a threshold, parameter, materiality test, or other non-abstraction rather than a catalog gap."}, "predicate": "Repeated collaboration is needed.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 63, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-063", "ledger_sha256": "1a1ab7ab8768cc6b70cb27c4eb45116c75bd1fc82828128391064c16c8073111"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Social Reality Construction Audit", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:social_reality_construction_audit", "slug": "social_reality_construction_audit"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 4 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is naturalization: a contingent arrangement is treated as objective or inevitable because people and institutions keep enacting it. The arrangement may be a category, a role, a credential, a status, a norm, a metric, a participation rule, or a routine practice.\n\nThe arrangement becomes durable because several channels reinforce each other. People use repeated language. Forms and systems require certain labels. Routines make the category actionable. Records preserve it. Incentives reward compliance. Authorities recognize it. New members learn it as normal.\n\nThis can be useful when the shared reality enables coordination. It becomes problematic when the arrangement hides value choices, excludes affected meanings, misclassifies people, reproduces outdated assumptions, or prevents legitimate revision.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A category, practice, role, norm, status, or institutional arrangement is treated as natural or objective even though it is maintained by shared language, repeated interaction, records, routines, and institutional reinforcement."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Symbolic boundaries can be openly recognized as constructed and revisable.", "slug": "symbolic_boundaries"}], "residual_id": "r:social_reality_construction_audit:b063_a11_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b063_a11_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when a category or practice controls access, status, responsibility, recognition, eligibility, or interpretation, and participants disagree about whether it is natural, fair, useful, or changeable. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Participants describe a category or practice as simply how things are even when its boundaries, labels, or consequences are contested.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Participants describe a category or practice as simply how things are even when its boundaries, labels, or consequences are contested.", "It is especially useful when a category or practice controls access, status, responsibility, recognition, eligibility, or interpretation, and participants disagree about whether it is natural, fair, useful, or changeable."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Symbolic boundaries can be openly recognized as constructed and revisable.", "slug": "symbolic_boundaries"}], "normalized_requirement": "Participants describe a category or practice as simply how things are even when its boundaries, labels, or consequences are contested.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Participants describe a category or practice as simply how things are even when its boundaries, labels, or consequences are contested.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P100-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve an institutional construct whose definition affects how actors or cases are treated.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A socially or institutionally defined construct organizes treatment or action.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail consequences caused by the construct rather than merely a descriptive label.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The construct produces real consequences.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve limited intelligibility of why the consequential construct is defined as it is.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Few people can explain the rationale for the construct's definition.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}], "predicate": "An institutional construct produces real consequences although few people can explain why it is defined that way.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "consequential institutional construct has opaque definitional rationale", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P100-C05-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Procedure-work mismatch does not entail an unexplained categorical label.", "slug": "procedure_work_mismatch"}], "residual_id": "r:social_reality_construction_audit:b063_a11_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b063_a11_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The arrangement may be a category, a role, a credential, a status, a norm, a metric, a participation rule, or a routine practice. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A label, form, metric, credential, role, or routine produces real consequences but few people can explain why it is defined that way.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A label, form, metric, credential, role, or routine produces real consequences but few people can explain why it is defined that way.", "The arrangement may be a category, a role, a credential, a status, a norm, a metric, a participation rule, or a routine practice."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Procedure-work mismatch does not entail an unexplained categorical label.", "slug": "procedure_work_mismatch"}], "normalized_requirement": "A label, form, metric, credential, role, or routine produces real consequences but few people can explain why it is defined that way.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A label, form, metric, credential, role, or routine produces real consequences but few people can explain why it is defined that way.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P100-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a current arrangement and a proposed change to it.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Actors face a proposed change to a current arrangement.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail prevention or blockage of the proposed change rather than mere difficulty.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The proposed change is blocked.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve perceived inevitability as the cause of blockage and the denial of choice or governability.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The blockage is caused by perceiving the current arrangement as inevitable rather than chosen or governable.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "A proposed change is blocked because the current arrangement is perceived as inevitable rather than chosen or governable.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "perceived inevitability of current arrangement blocks change", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P100-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A critical juncture can be widely recognized as a moment of choice.", "slug": "critical_juncture"}], "residual_id": "r:social_reality_construction_audit:b063_a11_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b063_a11_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The structural problem is naturalization: a contingent arrangement is treated as objective or inevitable because people and institutions keep enacting it. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A proposed change is blocked because the current arrangement feels inevitable rather than chosen or governable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A proposed change is blocked because the current arrangement feels inevitable rather than chosen or governable.", "The structural problem is naturalization: a contingent arrangement is treated as objective or inevitable because people and institutions keep enacting it."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A critical juncture can be widely recognized as a moment of choice.", "slug": "critical_juncture"}], "normalized_requirement": "A proposed change is blocked because the current arrangement feels inevitable rather than chosen or governable.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A proposed change is blocked because the current arrangement feels inevitable rather than chosen or governable.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Emic and etic perspectives necessarily permit the same category to carry different meanings across participant groups and analysts.", "role_mapping": "Groups -> interpretive standpoints; category -> shared label.", "slug": "emic_and_etic", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b063_a11_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Different groups use the same category with different meanings, creating hidden conflict or misclassification. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Different groups use the same category with different meanings, creating hidden conflict or misclassification."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Emic And Etic", "one_liner": "A paired dual-description regime in which a phenomenon is captured under an insider scheme closed by participants' competence and an outsider scheme closed by analytic framework, with their divergence treated as a finding.", "page_ref": "prime:emic_and_etic", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Groups -> interpretive standpoints; category -> shared label.", "slug": "emic_and_etic", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Emic and etic perspectives necessarily permit the same category to carry different meanings across participant groups and analysts."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Different groups use the same category with different meanings, creating hidden conflict or misclassification.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "An institution wants to revise categories, records, or routines without losing coordination or accountability.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It also fits when an institution needs to revise a taxonomy, status, form, role, label, metric, or recognition process without destroying useful coordination. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: An institution wants to revise categories, records, or routines without losing coordination or accountability. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["An institution wants to revise categories, records, or routines without losing coordination or accountability.", "It also fits when an institution needs to revise a taxonomy, status, form, role, label, metric, or recognition process without destroying useful coordination."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "An institution wants to revise categories, records, or routines without losing coordination or accountability."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 63, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-063", "ledger_sha256": "1a1ab7ab8768cc6b70cb27c4eb45116c75bd1fc82828128391064c16c8073111"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Sociotechnical Integration", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:sociotechnical_integration", "slug": "sociotechnical_integration"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 5 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is one-sided design. A technical artifact is treated as if it can be optimized independently from the people and institutions that will use it. Meanwhile, the surrounding social system is expected to adapt without new authority, support, training, incentives, or governance.\n\nThe result is a misaligned coupling: the tool asks for behavior the workflow cannot support, the workflow creates data the tool cannot use, incentives reward bypassing the system, or accountability is assigned to people who lack the authority to act.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A technical change is treated as separate from the people, roles, processes, incentives, norms, and governance conditions that determine actual outcomes."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A sociotechnical system can be well integrated and effective.", "slug": "sociotechnical_systems"}], "residual_id": "r:sociotechnical_integration:b063_a12_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b063_a12_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially relevant when a rollout technically succeeds but operational outcomes, trust, safety, data quality, or adoption remain poor. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The technical design appears correct, but adoption, trust, data quality, safety, or outcome improvement is poor.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The technical design appears correct, but adoption, trust, data quality, safety, or outcome improvement is poor.", "It is especially relevant when a rollout technically succeeds but operational outcomes, trust, safety, data quality, or adoption remain poor."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A sociotechnical system can be well integrated and effective.", "slug": "sociotechnical_systems"}], "normalized_requirement": "The technical design appears correct, but adoption, trust, data quality, safety, or outcome improvement is poor.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The technical design appears correct, but adoption, trust, data quality, safety, or outcome improvement is poor.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Unofficial workarounds and manual repairs necessarily expose a gap between prescribed procedure and actual work.", "role_mapping": "Technical process -> prescribed procedure; workaround -> work as done.", "slug": "procedure_work_mismatch", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b063_a12_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Typical signals include shadow systems, manual workarounds, duplicate documentation, operator resistance, alert fatigue, unclear ownership, or a gap between usage metrics and lived experience. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: People create workarounds, shadow systems, unofficial handoffs, or manual repairs to compensate for technical or process misfit.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["People create workarounds, shadow systems, unofficial handoffs, or manual repairs to compensate for technical or process misfit.", "Typical signals include shadow systems, manual workarounds, duplicate documentation, operator resistance, alert fatigue, unclear ownership, or a gap between usage metrics and lived experience."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Procedure-Work Mismatch", "one_liner": "A system's prescribed model of how work happens diverges systematically from how work is actually done, with the gap often load-bearing for performance, so the question is how the gap is managed rather than whether it can be eliminated.", "page_ref": "prime:procedure_work_mismatch", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Technical process -> prescribed procedure; workaround -> work as done.", "slug": "procedure_work_mismatch", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Unofficial workarounds and manual repairs necessarily expose a gap between prescribed procedure and actual work."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "People create workarounds, shadow systems, unofficial handoffs, or manual repairs to compensate for technical or process misfit.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P100-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a change and the actors or system that receive its new burden.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A change alters the work or exposure of affected actors.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when the change creates new responsibilities.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The change creates new responsibilities.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when the change creates new risks.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The change creates new risks.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when the change creates new coordination work.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The change creates new coordination work.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve absence of all three named enabling assignments rather than only generic implementation difficulty.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Authority, support, and incentives for the new burden are not assigned.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "A change creates a new responsibility, risk, or coordination burden without assigning authority, support, or incentives.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "change creates new burden without enabling assignments", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P100-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A sociotechnical change can explicitly assign every new responsibility.", "slug": "sociotechnical_systems"}], "residual_id": "r:sociotechnical_integration:b063_a12_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b063_a12_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The result is a misaligned coupling: the tool asks for behavior the workflow cannot support, the workflow creates data the tool cannot use, incentives reward bypassing the system, or accountability is assigned to people who lack the authority to act. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The change creates new responsibilities, risks, or coordination work without assigning authority, support, or incentives.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The change creates new responsibilities, risks, or coordination work without assigning authority, support, or incentives.", "The result is a misaligned coupling: the tool asks for behavior the workflow cannot support, the workflow creates data the tool cannot use, incentives reward bypassing the system, or accountability is assigned to people who lack the authority to act."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A sociotechnical change can explicitly assign every new responsibility.", "slug": "sociotechnical_systems"}], "normalized_requirement": "The change creates new responsibilities, risks, or coordination work without assigning authority, support, or incentives.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The change creates new responsibilities, risks, or coordination work without assigning authority, support, or incentives.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Triangulation can produce convergent rather than conflicting evidence.", "slug": "triangulation"}], "residual_id": "r:sociotechnical_integration:b063_a12_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b063_a12_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Typical signals include shadow systems, manual workarounds, duplicate documentation, operator resistance, alert fatigue, unclear ownership, or a gap between usage metrics and lived experience. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Metrics show usage or deployment while field evidence shows burden, resistance, errors, gaming, or degraded service.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Metrics show usage or deployment while field evidence shows burden, resistance, errors, gaming, or degraded service.", "Typical signals include shadow systems, manual workarounds, duplicate documentation, operator resistance, alert fatigue, unclear ownership, or a gap between usage metrics and lived experience."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Triangulation can produce convergent rather than conflicting evidence.", "slug": "triangulation"}], "normalized_requirement": "Metrics show usage or deployment while field evidence shows burden, resistance, errors, gaming, or degraded service.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Metrics show usage or deployment while field evidence shows burden, resistance, errors, gaming, or degraded service.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P100-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve all six named functional team perspectives and their shared system referent.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Technical, operational, user, compliance, training, and governance teams describe the same system.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail incompatibility among the named teams' assumptions, not merely different vocabularies or viewpoints.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The named teams' descriptions rely on incompatible assumptions.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Technical, operational, user, compliance, training, and governance teams describe the same system with incompatible assumptions.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "named system teams hold incompatible assumptions", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P100-C08-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Cross-functional teams can share a coherent model of a sociotechnical system.", "slug": "sociotechnical_systems"}], "residual_id": "r:sociotechnical_integration:b063_a12_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b063_a12_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Meanwhile, the surrounding social system is expected to adapt without new authority, support, training, incentives, or governance. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Technical, operational, user, compliance, training, and governance teams describe the same system with incompatible assumptions.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Technical, operational, user, compliance, training, and governance teams describe the same system with incompatible assumptions.", "Meanwhile, the surrounding social system is expected to adapt without new authority, support, training, incentives, or governance."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Cross-functional teams can share a coherent model of a sociotechnical system.", "slug": "sociotechnical_systems"}], "normalized_requirement": "Technical, operational, user, compliance, training, and governance teams describe the same system with incompatible assumptions.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Technical, operational, user, compliance, training, and governance teams describe the same system with incompatible assumptions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A new tool, platform, automation, workflow system, data system, or technical standard is being introduced into real human work.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The result is a misaligned coupling: the tool asks for behavior the workflow cannot support, the workflow creates data the tool cannot use, incentives reward bypassing the system, or accountability is assigned to people who lack the authority to act. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: A new tool, platform, automation, workflow system, data system, or technical standard is being introduced into real human work. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A new tool, platform, automation, workflow system, data system, or technical standard is being introduced into real human work.", "The result is a misaligned coupling: the tool asks for behavior the workflow cannot support, the workflow creates data the tool cannot use, incentives reward bypassing the system, or accountability is assigned to people who lack the authority to act."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "A new tool, platform, automation, workflow system, data system, or technical standard is being introduced into real human work."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 63, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-063", "ledger_sha256": "1a1ab7ab8768cc6b70cb27c4eb45116c75bd1fc82828128391064c16c8073111"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Solution Space Bounding", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:solution_space_bounding", "slug": "solution_space_bounding"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is unbounded or oversized possibility. Actors face too many options, cases, documents, designs, states, futures, or hypotheses to inspect exhaustively. Without an explicit bound, they either stall, search randomly, overclaim, or hide exclusions inside tacit assumptions.\n\nThe deeper tension is that openness protects discovery and fairness, while boundedness protects tractability. Leaving the space open can make action impossible. Closing it silently can make decisions brittle, biased, or illegitimate.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Actors face more possible options, cases, hypotheses, designs, states, documents, paths, or futures than they can inspect exhaustively, and the absence of an explicit bound makes search either impossible, arbitrary, or misleading."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An optimization problem can have a small finite candidate set.", "slug": "optimization"}], "residual_id": "r:solution_space_bounding:b063_a13_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b063_a13_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Actors face too many options, cases, documents, designs, states, futures, or hypotheses to inspect exhaustively. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The candidate set grows combinatorially as features, actors, jurisdictions, time horizons, configurations, or states are combined.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The candidate set grows combinatorially as features, actors, jurisdictions, time horizons, configurations, or states are combined.", "Actors face too many options, cases, documents, designs, states, futures, or hypotheses to inspect exhaustively."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An optimization problem can have a small finite candidate set.", "slug": "optimization"}], "normalized_requirement": "The candidate set grows combinatorially as features, actors, jurisdictions, time horizons, configurations, or states are combined.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The candidate set grows combinatorially as features, actors, jurisdictions, time horizons, configurations, or states are combined.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P100-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the initial stage of a search rather than a later revision of its scope.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A search process is beginning.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail absence of a declared rule or domain delimiting what is inside the search.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The search has no declared inclusion boundary.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Search begins without a declared inclusion boundary.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "search begins without declared inclusion boundary", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P100-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A problem space can be explicitly and tightly bounded.", "slug": "problem_space"}], "residual_id": "r:solution_space_bounding:b063_a13_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b063_a13_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Search begins with no declared population, scope, domain, time window, case class, or inclusion rule. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Search begins with no declared population, scope, domain, time window, case class, or inclusion rule."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A problem space can be explicitly and tightly bounded.", "slug": "problem_space"}], "normalized_requirement": "Search begins with no declared population, scope, domain, time window, case class, or inclusion rule.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Search begins with no declared population, scope, domain, time window, case class, or inclusion rule.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A problem space can be finite and completely enumerated.", "slug": "problem_space"}], "residual_id": "r:solution_space_bounding:b063_a13_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b063_a13_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when people say they need to consider “all options,” but the option space is too large or open-ended for exhaustive consideration. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A decision requires finite comparison, but the option space is unknown, open-ended, or effectively infinite.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A decision requires finite comparison, but the option space is unknown, open-ended, or effectively infinite.", "It is especially useful when people say they need to consider “all options,” but the option space is too large or open-ended for exhaustive consideration."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A problem space can be finite and completely enumerated.", "slug": "problem_space"}], "normalized_requirement": "A decision requires finite comparison, but the option space is unknown, open-ended, or effectively infinite.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A decision requires finite comparison, but the option space is unknown, open-ended, or effectively infinite.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P100-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a search, considered objects, and some objects placed outside its current scope.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A current search excludes some objects from consideration.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail a stakeholder-facing requirement to explain why objects were excluded.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Stakeholders require reasons for those exclusions.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Stakeholders require reasons explaining why some search objects were excluded from the current search.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "stakeholders require reasons for search exclusions", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P100-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Streetlight effects concern biased search visibility, not necessarily auditable exclusions.", "slug": "streetlight_effect"}], "residual_id": "r:solution_space_bounding:b063_a13_c7", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b063_a13_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It fits literature reviews, design-space exploration, legal discovery, diagnosis, scenario planning, product/vendor selection, configuration testing, and computational search. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Stakeholders need to know why some candidates, records, scenarios, or hypotheses were outside the current search.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders need to know why some candidates, records, scenarios, or hypotheses were outside the current search.", "It fits literature reviews, design-space exploration, legal discovery, diagnosis, scenario planning, product/vendor selection, configuration testing, and computational search."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Streetlight effects concern biased search visibility, not necessarily auditable exclusions.", "slug": "streetlight_effect"}], "normalized_requirement": "Stakeholders need to know why some candidates, records, scenarios, or hypotheses were outside the current search.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Stakeholders need to know why some candidates, records, scenarios, or hypotheses were outside the current search.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The phrase “anything is possible” or “we should consider all options” blocks practical search.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when the first obstacle is not choosing the best option, but defining the universe of options that can responsibly be searched. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The phrase “anything is possible” or “we should consider all options” blocks practical search. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The phrase “anything is possible” or “we should consider all options” blocks practical search.", "Use this archetype when the first obstacle is not choosing the best option, but defining the universe of options that can responsibly be searched."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "The phrase “anything is possible” or “we should consider all options” blocks practical search."}, {"display_text": "Teams spend more time debating what belongs in the search than evaluating candidates within it.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Teams spend more time debating what belongs in the search than evaluating candidates within it. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Teams spend more time debating what belongs in the search than evaluating candidates within it."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Teams spend more time debating what belongs in the search than evaluating candidates within it."}, {"display_text": "Past attempts either scanned too broadly and exhausted resources or narrowed silently and lost legitimacy.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Past attempts either scanned too broadly and exhausted resources or narrowed silently and lost legitimacy. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Past attempts either scanned too broadly and exhausted resources or narrowed silently and lost legitimacy."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Past attempts either scanned too broadly and exhausted resources or narrowed silently and lost legitimacy."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 63, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-063", "ledger_sha256": "1a1ab7ab8768cc6b70cb27c4eb45116c75bd1fc82828128391064c16c8073111"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Solvable Baseline Decomposition", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:solvable_baseline_decomposition", "slug": "solvable_baseline_decomposition"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A complex problem is too hard to solve all at once, but treating it as merely “too complex” wastes the structure that is already known. Conversely, treating the simple case as the answer ignores important departures. The structural problem is the lack of a disciplined relation among:\n\n- the target problem,\n- the solvable baseline,\n- the residual differences,\n- the correction sequence,\n- the error budget, and\n- the validity boundary.\n\nWithout those relations, teams either overgeneralize the baseline, overbuild an opaque full-complexity model, or bolt on corrections without knowing when those corrections have lost validity.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A complex system, model, design, or decision problem is too difficult to solve directly, but a nearby reference case is solvable or well understood. Without a disciplined baseline-plus-perturbation split, teams either oversimplify and ignore meaningful departures, overbuild a full-complexity model they cannot validate, or add ad hoc corrections whose authority is unclear."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Perturbation begins with a known reference case plus additional small forces, constraints, or effects.", "role_mapping": "Solvable case -> baseline; extra features -> perturbations.", "slug": "perturbation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b063_a14_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use it when a hard target problem is close enough to a solved or trusted reference case that the target can be represented as baseline plus departures. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A target problem resembles a known solvable case but includes extra forces, constraints, features, uncertainty, stakeholders, or environmental effects.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A target problem resembles a known solvable case but includes extra forces, constraints, features, uncertainty, stakeholders, or environmental effects.", "Use it when a hard target problem is close enough to a solved or trusted reference case that the target can be represented as baseline plus departures."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Perturbation", "one_liner": "Small disturbance.", "page_ref": "prime:perturbation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Solvable case -> baseline; extra features -> perturbations.", "slug": "perturbation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Perturbation begins with a known reference case plus additional small forces, constraints, or effects."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A target problem resembles a known solvable case but includes extra forces, constraints, features, uncertainty, stakeholders, or environmental effects.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A problem space can be directly tractable.", "slug": "problem_space"}], "residual_id": "r:solvable_baseline_decomposition:b063_a14_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b063_a14_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A complex system, model, design, or decision problem is too difficult to solve directly, but a nearby reference case is solvable or well understood. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The full target problem is analytically, computationally, organizationally, or cognitively too complex to handle directly.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The full target problem is analytically, computationally, organizationally, or cognitively too complex to handle directly.", "A complex system, model, design, or decision problem is too difficult to solve directly, but a nearby reference case is solvable or well understood."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A problem space can be directly tractable.", "slug": "problem_space"}], "normalized_requirement": "The full target problem is analytically, computationally, organizationally, or cognitively too complex to handle directly.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The full target problem is analytically, computationally, organizationally, or cognitively too complex to handle directly.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A solvable baseline is the necessary reference state for perturbative reasoning.", "role_mapping": "Reference model -> unperturbed solution.", "slug": "perturbation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b063_a14_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The baseline might be a known equation, benchmark design, equilibrium model, normal operating plan, reference workflow, or canonical case. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A simpler reference model, benchmark, equilibrium, design, workflow, or canonical case can be solved, measured, or trusted.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A simpler reference model, benchmark, equilibrium, design, workflow, or canonical case can be solved, measured, or trusted.", "The baseline might be a known equation, benchmark design, equilibrium model, normal operating plan, reference workflow, or canonical case."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Perturbation", "one_liner": "Small disturbance.", "page_ref": "prime:perturbation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Reference model -> unperturbed solution.", "slug": "perturbation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A solvable baseline is the necessary reference state for perturbative reasoning."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A simpler reference model, benchmark, equilibrium, design, workflow, or canonical case can be solved, measured, or trusted.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Differences from the baseline are explicitly represented as perturbations or residual terms.", "role_mapping": "Target differences -> perturbing terms.", "slug": "perturbation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b063_a14_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The departure might be a forcing term, residual, design modification, exception class, scenario load, environmental shift, or secondary effect. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The differences between baseline and target can be named as residuals, deltas, forcing terms, design modifications, or environmental departures.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The differences between baseline and target can be named as residuals, deltas, forcing terms, design modifications, or environmental departures.", "The departure might be a forcing term, residual, design modification, exception class, scenario load, environmental shift, or secondary effect."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Perturbation", "one_liner": "Small disturbance.", "page_ref": "prime:perturbation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Target differences -> perturbing terms.", "slug": "perturbation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Differences from the baseline are explicitly represented as perturbations or residual terms."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The differences between baseline and target can be named as residuals, deltas, forcing terms, design modifications, or environmental departures.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Decision-makers need an interpretable approximation before investing in high-fidelity modeling or full redesign.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially appropriate when the user needs an interpretable approximation, a staged path from simple to complex, or a disciplined way to decide which refinements matter. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Decision-makers need an interpretable approximation before investing in high-fidelity modeling or full redesign. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Decision-makers need an interpretable approximation before investing in high-fidelity modeling or full redesign.", "It is especially appropriate when the user needs an interpretable approximation, a staged path from simple to complex, or a disciplined way to decide which refinements matter."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Decision-makers need an interpretable approximation before investing in high-fidelity modeling or full redesign."}, {"display_text": "The cost of being exactly right is high, but the cost of an unbounded approximation is also unacceptable.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this deployment constraint: The cost of being exactly right is high, but the cost of an unbounded approximation is also unacceptable. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The cost of being exactly right is high, but the cost of an unbounded approximation is also unacceptable."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The cost of being exactly right is high, but the cost of an unbounded approximation is also unacceptable."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 63, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-063", "ledger_sha256": "1a1ab7ab8768cc6b70cb27c4eb45116c75bd1fc82828128391064c16c8073111"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Source Distortion Modeling", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:source_distortion_modeling", "slug": "source_distortion_modeling"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 5, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Receivers often treat a report, testimony, narrative, metric, dashboard, memory, explanation, or institutional account as either transparent evidence or wholly unreliable. When the source is systematically distorted, both responses fail: uncritical acceptance imports the distortion, while blanket rejection discards information that could still be recovered by modeling the distortion pattern.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Receivers often treat a report, testimony, narrative, metric, dashboard, memory, explanation, or institutional account as either transparent evidence or wholly unreliable. When the source is systematically distorted, both responses fail: uncritical acceptance imports the distortion, while blanket rejection discards information that could still be recovered by modeling the distortion pattern."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "An unreliable narrator mediates a reality the audience cannot inspect directly.", "role_mapping": "Source -> narrator; receiver -> audience; reality -> narrated events.", "slug": "unreliable_narrator", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b063_a15_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The account mediates access and must be treated as a channel rather than the reality itself. In this condition set, the requirement is: A source reports on a reality that cannot be directly inspected by the receiver.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A source reports on a reality that cannot be directly inspected by the receiver."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Unreliable Narrator", "one_liner": "A source whose report is systematically distorted relative to the reality it describes, so the receiver must model the distortion rather than read the account as transparent.", "page_ref": "prime:unreliable_narrator", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source -> narrator; receiver -> audience; reality -> narrated events.", "slug": "unreliable_narrator", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "An unreliable narrator mediates a reality the audience cannot inspect directly."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A source reports on a reality that cannot be directly inspected by the receiver.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Unreliability is systematic bias or distortion, not independent random noise alone.", "role_mapping": "Systematic distortion -> narrator unreliability.", "slug": "unreliable_narrator", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b063_a15_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The issue is bias, omission, self-protection, incentive pressure, role constraint, audience shaping, memory reconstruction, or pipeline skew, not just ordinary noise. In this condition set, the requirement is: There is reason to suspect systematic rather than random distortion.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["There is reason to suspect systematic rather than random distortion."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Unreliable Narrator", "one_liner": "A source whose report is systematically distorted relative to the reality it describes, so the receiver must model the distortion rather than read the account as transparent.", "page_ref": "prime:unreliable_narrator", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Systematic distortion -> narrator unreliability.", "slug": "unreliable_narrator", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Unreliability is systematic bias or distortion, not independent random noise alone."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "There is reason to suspect systematic rather than random distortion.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The account remains evidentially useful precisely because it is interpreted rather than discarded wholesale.", "role_mapping": "Useful content -> recoverable account.", "slug": "unreliable_narrator", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b063_a15_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "If the account is known fabrication with no decision value, rejection may be enough; this archetype applies when interpretation can recover value. In this condition set, the requirement is: The account still contains potentially useful information.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The account still contains potentially useful information."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Unreliable Narrator", "one_liner": "A source whose report is systematically distorted relative to the reality it describes, so the receiver must model the distortion rather than read the account as transparent.", "page_ref": "prime:unreliable_narrator", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Useful content -> recoverable account.", "slug": "unreliable_narrator", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The account remains evidentially useful precisely because it is interpreted rather than discarded wholesale."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The account still contains potentially useful information.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Different claims from an unreliable narrator can warrant different credibility weights.", "role_mapping": "Account parts -> claims; reliability -> variable weights.", "slug": "unreliable_narrator", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b063_a15_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A source can be accurate about sequence but unreliable about motive, reliable about sensory details but unreliable about causal interpretation, or reliable under one audience and distorted under another. In this condition set, the requirement is: Different parts of the account may have different reliability.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Different parts of the account may have different reliability."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Unreliable Narrator", "one_liner": "A source whose report is systematically distorted relative to the reality it describes, so the receiver must model the distortion rather than read the account as transparent.", "page_ref": "prime:unreliable_narrator", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Account parts -> claims; reliability -> variable weights.", "slug": "unreliable_narrator", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Different claims from an unreliable narrator can warrant different credibility weights."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Different parts of the account may have different reliability.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Fabula and syuzhet necessarily distinguish event chronology and causal order from telling order and emphasis.", "role_mapping": "Events -> fabula; presentation -> syuzhet.", "slug": "fabula_and_syuzhet", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b063_a15_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Narrative form, summarization, reporting protocols, and dashboards can all create syuzhet/fabula-like divergence. In this condition set, the requirement is: The telling order, emphasis, or framing may differ from event order or causal structure.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The telling order, emphasis, or framing may differ from event order or causal structure."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Fabula And Syuzhet", "one_liner": "The chronology of events and the order in which they are told are separable design objects, each optimizable for its own criterion.", "page_ref": "prime:fabula_and_syuzhet", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Events -> fabula; presentation -> syuzhet.", "slug": "fabula_and_syuzhet", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Fabula and syuzhet necessarily distinguish event chronology and causal order from telling order and emphasis."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The telling order, emphasis, or framing may differ from event order or causal structure.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The account will influence belief, policy, diagnosis, reputation, adjudication, or downstream automation.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "High-stakes reuse requires explicit source distortion handling. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The account will influence belief, policy, diagnosis, reputation, adjudication, or downstream automation. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The account will influence belief, policy, diagnosis, reputation, adjudication, or downstream automation.", "High-stakes reuse requires explicit source distortion handling."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The account will influence belief, policy, diagnosis, reputation, adjudication, or downstream automation."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 63, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-063", "ledger_sha256": "1a1ab7ab8768cc6b70cb27c4eb45116c75bd1fc82828128391064c16c8073111"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Source-of-Truth Assignment", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:source_of_truth_assignment", "slug": "source_of_truth_assignment"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is competing representation without accepted precedence. Multiple artifacts claim to describe the same underlying subject, but no governed relationship says which one controls. The subject might be a customer, asset, patient, policy, contract, codebase, dataset, decision, role assignment, or operational state.\n\nThis creates a characteristic failure: everyone can point to evidence, but the system cannot decide which evidence governs. The result is local truth, stale truth, shadow truth, and informal authority. People make different decisions because they consult different repositories, or because they treat the most convenient copy as if it were current.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Multiple records, systems, actors, documents, models, versions, or repositories claim to represent the same subject, but they disagree and no governed rule determines which representation controls action."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Representational mismatch can exist without conflicting factual values.", "slug": "representational_structure_mismatch"}], "residual_id": "r:source_of_truth_assignment:b064_a01_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b064_a01_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use it when decisions, obligations, permissions, identities, states, or versions need a governing source. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Different systems report conflicting values, statuses, obligations, permissions, definitions, or versions for the same subject.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Different systems report conflicting values, statuses, obligations, permissions, definitions, or versions for the same subject.", "Use it when decisions, obligations, permissions, identities, states, or versions need a governing source."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Representational mismatch can exist without conflicting factual values.", "slug": "representational_structure_mismatch"}], "normalized_requirement": "Different systems report conflicting values, statuses, obligations, permissions, definitions, or versions for the same subject.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Different systems report conflicting values, statuses, obligations, permissions, definitions, or versions for the same subject.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P100-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve actors selecting among records or representations with practical consequence.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Actors choose among records that can guide action.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail absence of an accepted precedence rule, not merely violation of an established one.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "No precedence rule for choosing the controlling record is accepted.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the stated causal direction from missing precedence to record selection.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The absence of accepted precedence causes the non-governed selection basis.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by opportunistic record selection.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Records are chosen opportunistically.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by locally determined record selection.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Records are chosen according to local practice.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by historically inherited record selection.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "Records are chosen according to historical practice.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Actors choose among records by a non-governed basis because no precedence rule is accepted.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "absence of accepted precedence causes non-governed record selection", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P100-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Motivated reasoning can select among evidence even when source precedence is explicit.", "slug": "motivated_reasoning"}], "residual_id": "r:source_of_truth_assignment:b064_a01_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b064_a01_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The structural problem is competing representation without accepted precedence. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Actors choose records opportunistically, locally, or historically because no precedence rule is accepted.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Actors choose records opportunistically, locally, or historically because no precedence rule is accepted.", "The structural problem is competing representation without accepted precedence."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Motivated reasoning can select among evidence even when source precedence is explicit.", "slug": "motivated_reasoning"}], "normalized_requirement": "Actors choose records opportunistically, locally, or historically because no precedence rule is accepted.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Actors choose records opportunistically, locally, or historically because no precedence rule is accepted.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Denormalization duplicates one logical fact across representations with distinct update histories.", "role_mapping": "Many copies -> denormalized records; update histories -> duplicated state.", "slug": "denormalization", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b064_a01_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The subject might be a customer, asset, patient, policy, contract, codebase, dataset, decision, role assignment, or operational state. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The same policy, asset, identity, model, contract, or decision appears in many places with different update histories.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The same policy, asset, identity, model, contract, or decision appears in many places with different update histories.", "The subject might be a customer, asset, patient, policy, contract, codebase, dataset, decision, role assignment, or operational state."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Denormalization", "one_liner": "Deliberately re-introduce controlled redundancy against a canonical form, trading a synchronization burden for access-side wins.", "page_ref": "prime:denormalization", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Many copies -> denormalized records; update histories -> duplicated state.", "slug": "denormalization", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Denormalization duplicates one logical fact across representations with distinct update histories."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The same policy, asset, identity, model, contract, or decision appears in many places with different update histories.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Independent duplicated representations can necessarily yield inconsistent downstream inputs when updates diverge.", "role_mapping": "Parallel representations -> copies; inconsistent inputs -> update anomaly.", "slug": "denormalization", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b064_a01_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Downstream action depends on a consistent answer rather than merely knowing all versions exist. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Downstream work depends on a stable answer but receives inconsistent inputs from parallel representations.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Downstream work depends on a stable answer but receives inconsistent inputs from parallel representations.", "Downstream action depends on a consistent answer rather than merely knowing all versions exist."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Denormalization", "one_liner": "Deliberately re-introduce controlled redundancy against a canonical form, trading a synchronization burden for access-side wins.", "page_ref": "prime:denormalization", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Parallel representations -> copies; inconsistent inputs -> update anomaly.", "slug": "denormalization", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Independent duplicated representations can necessarily yield inconsistent downstream inputs when updates diverge."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Downstream work depends on a stable answer but receives inconsistent inputs from parallel representations.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P100-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a derivative artifact and the distinction between it and an originating or governing source.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A representation is derived from another source.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail erroneous attribution of governing authority to the derivative artifact.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The derived representation is mistakenly treated as governing.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when the mistaken governing source is a copy.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The derived representation is a copy.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when the mistaken governing source is a cache.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The derived representation is a cache.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when the mistaken governing source is an extract.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The derived representation is an extract.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when the mistaken governing source is a summary.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The derived representation is a summary.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when the mistaken governing source is a dashboard.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The derived representation is a dashboard.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A derived representation is mistaken for a governing source.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "derived representation is mistaken for governing source", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P100-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A denormalized copy can be correctly identified as nonauthoritative.", "slug": "denormalization"}], "residual_id": "r:source_of_truth_assignment:b064_a01_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b064_a01_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use it when decisions, obligations, permissions, identities, states, or versions need a governing source. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Copies, caches, extracts, summaries, or dashboards are mistaken for governing sources.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Copies, caches, extracts, summaries, or dashboards are mistaken for governing sources.", "Use it when decisions, obligations, permissions, identities, states, or versions need a governing source."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "If the extract retained its caveats and was treated only as a traceable quotation, it would fail the exact laundering endpoint rather than counterexample the DSA.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Quote Laundering", "one_liner": "A provisional but accurate statement is cited across successive venues that each strip its caveats and scope, until it circulates as authoritative settled fact — a channel failure, not a false source, so it resists source correction and needs traceability instead.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:quote_laundering", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "quote_laundering"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "quote_laundering", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P100-C12-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every complete quote-laundering instance supplies derivation, mistaken authority, and the extract branch."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Copies, caches, extracts, summaries, or dashboards are mistaken for governing sources.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P100-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a dispute in which more than one source representation could govern.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A dispute involves competing source representations.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail a requirement to identify the controlling source for the dispute.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Resolution requires determining which source controls.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "A dispute requires determining which source controls.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "dispute requires controlling-source determination", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P100-C13-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P100-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a source with governing status and the possibility that its content is erroneous.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A controlling source can be wrong.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail assignment or determination of authority to correct the governing source.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "An authorized actor must be identifiable to correct the wrong source.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "When a controlling source is wrong, a dispute requires identifying who may correct it.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "wrong controlling source requires assigned correction authority", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P100-C13-U2"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Governance need not concern record precedence.", "slug": "governance"}], "residual_id": "r:source_of_truth_assignment:b064_a01_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b064_a01_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Disputes require knowing which source controls and who may correct it when it is wrong. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Disputes require knowing which source controls and who may correct it when it is wrong."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 2, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 2}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Governance need not concern record precedence.", "slug": "governance"}], "normalized_requirement": "Disputes require knowing which source controls and who may correct it when it is wrong.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 2 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Disputes require knowing which source controls and who may correct it when it is wrong.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 64, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-064", "ledger_sha256": "0551bef369f0597477ad47e432aa371a73d34864023eea7203824dcb33d3d0f9"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Source Provenance Triangulation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:source_provenance_triangulation", "slug": "source_provenance_triangulation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 0, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 0 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 0 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 0}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is evidentiary flattening. Sources are placed behind claims as if they all carry the same kind of support. A citation, log, interview, official record, memory, artifact, dataset, or later analysis may all appear in the same reference pool, but each has different access, incentives, proximity, and transformation history.\n\nWhen those differences are hidden, weak claims can harden into consensus. A claim repeated by many sources may still have one origin. A vivid witness account may dominate a dry but more direct record. An official report may have strong provenance but narrow perspective. A later synthesis may be clear while distancing the reader from the original evidence.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "An account relies on sources as if they were interchangeable proof, without exposing whether they are firsthand, derivative, interpretive, biased, edited, distant from the event, mutually dependent, or independently corroborated."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [], "condition_structure": "DISJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "mixed evidence base.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this source condition requiring clarification: mixed evidence base. The wording is retained for source review rather than assigned a stronger semantic role.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["mixed evidence base"]}, "function": "MALFORMED", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because the source wording is not structurally clear enough to support a formal trigger role without clarification.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "mixed evidence base"}, {"display_text": "conflicting accounts.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially important when sources conflict, when an account will become institutional memory, when a finding affects accountability, or when a polished secondary account may be standing on weak primary evidence. In this archetype, the relevant source condition requiring clarification is: conflicting accounts. The wording is retained for source review rather than assigned a stronger semantic role.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["conflicting accounts", "It is especially important when sources conflict, when an account will become institutional memory, when a finding affects accountability, or when a polished secondary account may be standing on weak primary evidence."]}, "function": "MALFORMED", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because the source wording is not structurally clear enough to support a formal trigger role without clarification.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "conflicting accounts"}, {"display_text": "high reuse risk.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this source condition requiring clarification: high reuse risk. The wording is retained for source review rather than assigned a stronger semantic role.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["high reuse risk"]}, "function": "MALFORMED", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because the source wording is not structurally clear enough to support a formal trigger role without clarification.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "high reuse risk"}, {"display_text": "derivative consensus.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this source condition requiring clarification: derivative consensus. The wording is retained for source review rather than assigned a stronger semantic role.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["derivative consensus"]}, "function": "MALFORMED", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because the source wording is not structurally clear enough to support a formal trigger role without clarification.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "derivative consensus"}, {"display_text": "sensitive accountability context.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this source condition requiring clarification: sensitive accountability context. The wording is retained for source review rather than assigned a stronger semantic role.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["sensitive accountability context"]}, "function": "MALFORMED", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because the source wording is not structurally clear enough to support a formal trigger role without clarification.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "sensitive accountability context"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 64, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-064", "ledger_sha256": "0551bef369f0597477ad47e432aa371a73d34864023eea7203824dcb33d3d0f9"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Source–Sink Viability Management", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:source_sink_viability_management", "slug": "source_sink_viability_management"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 5, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A coupled system is treated as if every site or unit is locally viable, while some sinks persist only because surplus from sources compensates for their deficit, masking source depletion, sink fragility, or maladaptive dependency.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A coupled system is treated as if every site or unit is locally viable, while some sinks persist only because surplus from sources compensates for their deficit, masking source depletion, sink fragility, or maladaptive dependency."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime distinguishes surplus-producing sources from deficit-dependent sinks.", "role_mapping": "Surplus units -> sources; consuming units -> sinks.", "slug": "source_sink_habitat", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b064_a03_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Some sites, teams, habitats, accounts, markets, services, or units generate surplus while others consume, lose, or require more than they produce. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Some sites, teams, habitats, accounts, markets, services, or units generate surplus while others consume, lose, or require more than they produce."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Source-Sink Dynamics", "one_liner": "A system persists across coupled sites with asymmetric net balance: net-producing sources export a surplus that sustains net-consuming sinks which would decline in isolation.", "page_ref": "prime:source_sink_habitat", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Surplus units -> sources; consuming units -> sinks.", "slug": "source_sink_habitat", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime distinguishes surplus-producing sources from deficit-dependent sinks."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Some sites, teams, habitats, accounts, markets, services, or units generate surplus while others consume, lose, or require more than they produce.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A sink necessarily declines without immigration or other support from a source.", "role_mapping": "Deficit unit -> sink; incoming support -> sustaining flow.", "slug": "source_sink_habitat", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b064_a03_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The intervention must preserve beneficial support while making dependency, depletion, and exit choices explicit. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Deficit units would decline, fail, collapse, exit, or become unacceptable without incoming support.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Deficit units would decline, fail, collapse, exit, or become unacceptable without incoming support.", "The intervention must preserve beneficial support while making dependency, depletion, and exit choices explicit."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Source-Sink Dynamics", "one_liner": "A system persists across coupled sites with asymmetric net balance: net-producing sources export a surplus that sustains net-consuming sinks which would decline in isolation.", "page_ref": "prime:source_sink_habitat", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Deficit unit -> sink; incoming support -> sustaining flow.", "slug": "source_sink_habitat", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A sink necessarily declines without immigration or other support from a source."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Deficit units would decline, fail, collapse, exit, or become unacceptable without incoming support.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Aggregate persistence can mask that reproduction occurs in sources while sinks consume the surplus.", "role_mapping": "Aggregate system -> habitat network; uneven production -> source-sink structure.", "slug": "source_sink_habitat", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b064_a03_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Aggregate system performance hides the fact that persistence is unevenly produced and unevenly consumed. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Aggregate system performance hides the fact that persistence is unevenly produced and unevenly consumed."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Source-Sink Dynamics", "one_liner": "A system persists across coupled sites with asymmetric net balance: net-producing sources export a surplus that sustains net-consuming sinks which would decline in isolation.", "page_ref": "prime:source_sink_habitat", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Aggregate system -> habitat network; uneven production -> source-sink structure.", "slug": "source_sink_habitat", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Aggregate persistence can mask that reproduction occurs in sources while sinks consume the surplus."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Aggregate system performance hides the fact that persistence is unevenly produced and unevenly consumed.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Source-sink viability requires a usable dispersal or transfer path from source to sink.", "role_mapping": "Connectivity -> support path; sink persistence -> inflow.", "slug": "source_sink_habitat", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b064_a03_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A coupled system is treated as if every site or unit is locally viable, while some sinks persist only because surplus from sources compensates for their deficit, masking source depletion, sink fragility, or maladaptive dependency. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Connectivity matters: a sink can persist only if the surplus path from a source remains open, reliable, and not too delayed.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Connectivity matters: a sink can persist only if the surplus path from a source remains open, reliable, and not too delayed.", "A coupled system is treated as if every site or unit is locally viable, while some sinks persist only because surplus from sources compensates for their deficit, masking source depletion, sink fragility, or maladaptive dependency."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Source-Sink Dynamics", "one_liner": "A system persists across coupled sites with asymmetric net balance: net-producing sources export a surplus that sustains net-consuming sinks which would decline in isolation.", "page_ref": "prime:source_sink_habitat", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Connectivity -> support path; sink persistence -> inflow.", "slug": "source_sink_habitat", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Source-sink viability requires a usable dispersal or transfer path from source to sink."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Connectivity matters: a sink can persist only if the surplus path from a source remains open, reliable, and not too delayed.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Repeated export can reduce a source's own capacity and convert or collapse it.", "role_mapping": "Exports -> outflow; source viability -> productive stock.", "slug": "source_sink_habitat", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b064_a03_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Sources can be depleted, exploited, or weakened by repeated exports. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Sources can be depleted, exploited, or weakened by repeated exports."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Source-Sink Dynamics", "one_liner": "A system persists across coupled sites with asymmetric net balance: net-producing sources export a surplus that sustains net-consuming sinks which would decline in isolation.", "page_ref": "prime:source_sink_habitat", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Exports -> outflow; source viability -> productive stock.", "slug": "source_sink_habitat", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Repeated export can reduce a source's own capacity and convert or collapse it."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Sources can be depleted, exploited, or weakened by repeated exports.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Support flows can be protected, increased, redirected, tapered, conditioned, or withdrawn by design choices.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The intervention must preserve beneficial support while making dependency, depletion, and exit choices explicit. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: Support flows can be protected, increased, redirected, tapered, conditioned, or withdrawn by design choices. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Support flows can be protected, increased, redirected, tapered, conditioned, or withdrawn by design choices.", "The intervention must preserve beneficial support while making dependency, depletion, and exit choices explicit."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Support flows can be protected, increased, redirected, tapered, conditioned, or withdrawn by design choices."}, {"display_text": "Sinks may deserve support for equity, coverage, mission, option value, ecological function, or strategic future potential, but not all dependency should be permanent.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The system may need unequal flows to preserve total viability, equity, or strategic coverage, but unequal flows can also hide extraction from sources and permanent nonviability in sinks. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Sinks may deserve support for equity, coverage, mission, option value, ecological function, or strategic future potential, but not all dependency should be permanent. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Sinks may deserve support for equity, coverage, mission, option value, ecological function, or strategic future potential, but not all dependency should be permanent.", "The system may need unequal flows to preserve total viability, equity, or strategic coverage, but unequal flows can also hide extraction from sources and permanent nonviability in sinks."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "Sinks may deserve support for equity, coverage, mission, option value, ecological function, or strategic future potential, but not all dependency should be permanent."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 64, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-064", "ledger_sha256": "0551bef369f0597477ad47e432aa371a73d34864023eea7203824dcb33d3d0f9"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Spanning Connectivity Formation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:spanning_connectivity_formation", "slug": "spanning_connectivity_formation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The substrate contains many nodes, local ties, pores, interfaces, routes, or service points, but they are partitioned into disconnected components. Local improvements accumulate without producing end-to-end reachability. A useful global function—conduction, movement, communication, access, coordination, or flow—appears only when enough appropriately placed nodes or links join those components into a spanning cluster.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "The substrate contains many nodes, local ties, pores, interfaces, routes, or service points, but they are partitioned into disconnected components. Local improvements accumulate without producing end-to-end reachability. A useful global function—conduction, movement, communication, access, coordination, or flow—appears only when enough appropriately placed nodes or links join those components into a spanning cluster."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A percolation threshold concerns formation of a spanning path across a network or medium.", "role_mapping": "Population or geography -> substrate; target paths -> spanning cluster.", "slug": "percolation_threshold", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b064_a04_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The target function requires paths across a population, geography, material, organization, or multilayer network rather than only local performance. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The target function requires paths across a population, geography, material, organization, or multilayer network rather than only local performance."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Percolation Threshold", "one_liner": "On a network substrate, a system-spanning connected cluster appears suddenly at a sharp critical density of links, transforming isolated pieces into one reachable whole.", "page_ref": "prime:percolation_threshold", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Population or geography -> substrate; target paths -> spanning cluster.", "slug": "percolation_threshold", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A percolation threshold concerns formation of a spanning path across a network or medium."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The target function requires paths across a population, geography, material, organization, or multilayer network rather than only local performance.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Below the threshold, active nodes or links remain fragmented into disconnected components.", "role_mapping": "Fragmented regions -> subcritical clusters.", "slug": "percolation_threshold", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b064_a04_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The substrate contains many nodes, local ties, pores, interfaces, routes, or service points, but they are partitioned into disconnected components. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The current topology is fragmented into multiple components or disconnected regions.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The current topology is fragmented into multiple components or disconnected regions.", "The substrate contains many nodes, local ties, pores, interfaces, routes, or service points, but they are partitioned into disconnected components."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Percolation Threshold", "one_liner": "On a network substrate, a system-spanning connected cluster appears suddenly at a sharp critical density of links, transforming isolated pieces into one reachable whole.", "page_ref": "prime:percolation_threshold", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Fragmented regions -> subcritical clusters.", "slug": "percolation_threshold", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Below the threshold, active nodes or links remain fragmented into disconnected components."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The current topology is fragmented into multiple components or disconnected regions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Near threshold, a small activation increase can create a giant connected component nonlinearly.", "role_mapping": "Small merging actions -> occupancy increase; global reach -> percolation transition.", "slug": "percolation_threshold", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b064_a04_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The intervention must cross the useful connectivity threshold without treating maximum connectivity as the goal. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The system is near enough to a connectivity threshold that a small number of component-merging actions may have nonlinear effect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The system is near enough to a connectivity threshold that a small number of component-merging actions may have nonlinear effect.", "The intervention must cross the useful connectivity threshold without treating maximum connectivity as the goal."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Percolation Threshold", "one_liner": "On a network substrate, a system-spanning connected cluster appears suddenly at a sharp critical density of links, transforming isolated pieces into one reachable whole.", "page_ref": "prime:percolation_threshold", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Small merging actions -> occupancy increase; global reach -> percolation transition.", "slug": "percolation_threshold", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Near threshold, a small activation increase can create a giant connected component nonlinearly."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The system is near enough to a connectivity threshold that a small number of component-merging actions may have nonlinear effect.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P100-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a nominal adjacency relation and the potential connection it denotes.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Two nodes or loci are nominally adjacent or connected.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail that nominal adjacency does not guarantee usable connection.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Nominal adjacency alone is insufficient to make the connection usable.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when compatibility determines connection usability.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Compatibility determines whether the connection is usable.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when capacity determines connection usability.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Capacity determines whether the connection is usable.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when timing determines connection usability.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Timing determines whether the connection is usable.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when trust determines connection usability.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "Trust determines whether the connection is usable.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when permission determines connection usability.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "Permission determines whether the connection is usable.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Nominal adjacency does not make a connection usable unless an enabling factor permits use.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "nominal adjacency is insufficient for usable connection", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P100-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Percolation can be defined on already-usable binary links.", "slug": "percolation_threshold"}], "residual_id": "r:spanning_connectivity_formation:b064_a04_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b064_a04_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Nominal adjacency is not sufficient; compatibility, capacity, timing, trust, or permission determine whether a connection is usable. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Nominal adjacency is not sufficient; compatibility, capacity, timing, trust, or permission determine whether a connection is usable."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "If one assignment satisfied every compatibility predicate, the pathological dependency-hell state would not exist.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Dependency Hell", "one_liner": "The pathological state where a project's transitive dependency closure holds mutually incompatible version constraints, turning installation into an NP-complete constraint-satisfaction problem that no edge-level patch can resolve.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:dependency_hell", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "dependency_hell"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "dependency_hell", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P100-C14-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact DSA necessarily satisfies the compatibility branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A deployment whose connected nodes negotiate or enforce every compatibility dimension falls outside the exact fallacy.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Fallacy of Homogeneous Networks", "one_liner": "The implicit assumption that all nodes, links, OSes, versions, and configs across a distributed deployment are uniform — a missing degree of freedom in the system's model of its substrate that stays latent until deployment crosses a boundary where the uniformity breaks.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:fallacy_of_homogeneous_networks", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "fallacy_of_homogeneous_networks"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "fallacy_of_homogeneous_networks", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P100-C14-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact boundary-crossing failures directly satisfy the compatibility branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A reference refreshed within every churn period avoids the exact dropped-time error and thus is not a counterexample.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Fallacy of Stable Topology", "one_liner": "The design-time assumption that a distributed system's addressing and routing graph stays fixed over an interaction's lifetime — dropping the time argument from G(t) — so every cached reference becomes a latent bet that its referent has not moved.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:fallacy_of_stable_topology", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "fallacy_of_stable_topology"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "fallacy_of_stable_topology", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P100-C14-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact DSA necessarily makes connection usability depend on timing."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "If mere bridge existence licensed every substitution, the exact close-match loss-risk and consumer context check would disappear.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Near-equivalence Mapping", "one_liner": "Bridge two concepts in different controlled vocabularies with a declared correspondence that carries an explicit, typed loss-risk on the bridge itself, so consumers can route each substitution on whether their use falls in the safe zone.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:near_equivalence_mapping", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "near_equivalence_mapping"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "near_equivalence_mapping", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P100-C14-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every complete near-equivalence mapping satisfies the compatibility branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A relatedMatch bridge can exist yet forbid inferential use, demonstrating that adjacency alone is insufficient exactly as the DSA specifies.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Schema Mapping Relation", "one_liner": "Bridge two independently governed classification schemes with an explicit, typed assertion — source concept, target concept, and a fidelity grade (exact / close / broader / narrower / related) — so consumers know exactly what the bridge guarantees without merging the schemes.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:schema_mapping_relation", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "schema_mapping_relation"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "schema_mapping_relation", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P100-C14-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact fidelity-grade structure directly satisfies the compatibility branch."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Nominal adjacency is not sufficient; compatibility, capacity, timing, trust, or permission determine whether a connection is usable.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A node or link activation budget exists and placement decisions materially affect global reachability.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The system needs enough distributed connectivity to unlock global reachability, but additional links also increase cost, coordination load, contagion, cascade coupling, surveillance or control reach, attack surface, and the risk that one central bridge becomes a point of capture. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: A node or link activation budget exists and placement decisions materially affect global reachability. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A node or link activation budget exists and placement decisions materially affect global reachability.", "The system needs enough distributed connectivity to unlock global reachability, but additional links also increase cost, coordination load, contagion, cascade coupling, surveillance or control reach, attack surface, and the risk that one central bridge becomes a point of capture."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "A node or link activation budget exists and placement decisions materially affect global reachability."}, {"display_text": "Crossing the threshold can enable harmful propagation as well as beneficial flow.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The intervention must cross the useful connectivity threshold without treating maximum connectivity as the goal. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: Crossing the threshold can enable harmful propagation as well as beneficial flow. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Crossing the threshold can enable harmful propagation as well as beneficial flow.", "The intervention must cross the useful connectivity threshold without treating maximum connectivity as the goal."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Crossing the threshold can enable harmful propagation as well as beneficial flow."}, {"display_text": "Connectivity can decay through churn, failure, seasonal closure, or maintenance loss after initial formation.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Connectivity can decay through churn, failure, seasonal closure, or maintenance loss after initial formation. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Connectivity can decay through churn, failure, seasonal closure, or maintenance loss after initial formation."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "Connectivity can decay through churn, failure, seasonal closure, or maintenance loss after initial formation."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 64, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-064", "ledger_sha256": "0551bef369f0597477ad47e432aa371a73d34864023eea7203824dcb33d3d0f9"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Sparse-Activation Representation Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:sparse_activation_representation_design", "slug": "sparse_activation_representation_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 5, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system must represent many possible inputs, meanings, cases, states, or signals, but dense representation overloads the channel, processor, viewer, or learner, while overly coarse categorization collapses meaningful differences. Without sparse activation, the representation either becomes too expensive to read and maintain, or too blunt to distinguish cases that matter.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system must represent many possible inputs, meanings, cases, states, or signals, but dense representation overloads the channel, processor, viewer, or learner, while overly coarse categorization collapses meaningful differences. Without sparse activation, the representation either becomes too expensive to read and maintain, or too blunt to distinguish cases that matter."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Sparse coding requires a large representational basis with only a small subset active for any input.", "role_mapping": "Universe -> codebook; case -> sparse activation vector.", "slug": "sparse_coding", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b064_a05_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Sparse activation reconciles these pressures by expanding the possible unit pool while limiting how many units may be active for a particular case. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: There is a large universe of possible features, tags, basis elements, indicators, modules, or cues, but any single case requires only a few of them.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["There is a large universe of possible features, tags, basis elements, indicators, modules, or cues, but any single case requires only a few of them.", "Sparse activation reconciles these pressures by expanding the possible unit pool while limiting how many units may be active for a particular case."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Sparse Coding", "one_liner": "A system represents each input by activating a small content-specific subset of a much larger pool of units, gaining combinatorial capacity from the choice of which few are active.", "page_ref": "prime:sparse_coding", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Universe -> codebook; case -> sparse activation vector.", "slug": "sparse_coding", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Sparse coding requires a large representational basis with only a small subset active for any input."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "There is a large universe of possible features, tags, basis elements, indicators, modules, or cues, but any single case requires only a few of them.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A sparse representation exposes active units without storing or processing every zero dimension densely.", "role_mapping": "Active features -> nonzero coefficients; dense record -> full vector.", "slug": "sparse_coding", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b064_a05_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Sparse activation reconciles these pressures by expanding the possible unit pool while limiting how many units may be active for a particular case. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Downstream readers, decoders, analysts, models, or actors need quick access to the active features rather than a dense record of every possible dimension.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Downstream readers, decoders, analysts, models, or actors need quick access to the active features rather than a dense record of every possible dimension.", "Sparse activation reconciles these pressures by expanding the possible unit pool while limiting how many units may be active for a particular case."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Sparse Coding", "one_liner": "A system represents each input by activating a small content-specific subset of a much larger pool of units, gaining combinatorial capacity from the choice of which few are active.", "page_ref": "prime:sparse_coding", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Active features -> nonzero coefficients; dense record -> full vector.", "slug": "sparse_coding", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A sparse representation exposes active units without storing or processing every zero dimension densely."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Downstream readers, decoders, analysts, models, or actors need quick access to the active features rather than a dense record of every possible dimension.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Different combinations of reusable basis units provide combinatorial expressive capacity.", "role_mapping": "Cases -> activation patterns; shared units -> codebook elements.", "slug": "sparse_coding", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b064_a05_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Sparse activation reconciles these pressures by expanding the possible unit pool while limiting how many units may be active for a particular case. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The system needs combinatorial expressiveness: many cases should be representable by different combinations of shared units.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The system needs combinatorial expressiveness: many cases should be representable by different combinations of shared units.", "Sparse activation reconciles these pressures by expanding the possible unit pool while limiting how many units may be active for a particular case."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Sparse Coding", "one_liner": "A system represents each input by activating a small content-specific subset of a much larger pool of units, gaining combinatorial capacity from the choice of which few are active.", "page_ref": "prime:sparse_coding", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Cases -> activation patterns; shared units -> codebook elements.", "slug": "sparse_coding", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Different combinations of reusable basis units provide combinatorial expressive capacity."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The system needs combinatorial expressiveness: many cases should be representable by different combinations of shared units.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime limits simultaneous activation to reduce interference and resource cost.", "role_mapping": "Too many active units -> density; cost -> sparsity pressure.", "slug": "sparse_coding", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b064_a05_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Sparse activation reconciles these pressures by expanding the possible unit pool while limiting how many units may be active for a particular case. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Interference, cognitive load, compute cost, storage cost, or communication bandwidth grows sharply when too many units are active at once.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Interference, cognitive load, compute cost, storage cost, or communication bandwidth grows sharply when too many units are active at once.", "Sparse activation reconciles these pressures by expanding the possible unit pool while limiting how many units may be active for a particular case."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Sparse Coding", "one_liner": "A system represents each input by activating a small content-specific subset of a much larger pool of units, gaining combinatorial capacity from the choice of which few are active.", "page_ref": "prime:sparse_coding", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Too many active units -> density; cost -> sparsity pressure.", "slug": "sparse_coding", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime limits simultaneous activation to reduce interference and resource cost."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Interference, cognitive load, compute cost, storage cost, or communication bandwidth grows sharply when too many units are active at once.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Case-specific sparse activation selects different features for different inputs rather than one global subset.", "role_mapping": "Cases -> inputs; active features -> sparse codes.", "slug": "sparse_coding", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b064_a05_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Without sparse activation, the representation either becomes too expensive to read and maintain, or too blunt to distinguish cases that matter. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Global feature selection is insufficient because different cases require different features to become legible.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Global feature selection is insufficient because different cases require different features to become legible.", "Without sparse activation, the representation either becomes too expensive to read and maintain, or too blunt to distinguish cases that matter."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Sparse Coding", "one_liner": "A system represents each input by activating a small content-specific subset of a much larger pool of units, gaining combinatorial capacity from the choice of which few are active.", "page_ref": "prime:sparse_coding", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Cases -> inputs; active features -> sparse codes.", "slug": "sparse_coding", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Case-specific sparse activation selects different features for different inputs rather than one global subset."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Global feature selection is insufficient because different cases require different features to become legible.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Single-category classification is too rigid because cases can share some features while differing on others.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Single-category classification is too rigid because cases can share some features while differing on others. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Single-category classification is too rigid because cases can share some features while differing on others."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Single-category classification is too rigid because cases can share some features while differing on others."}, {"display_text": "The codebook can be curated, learned, pruned, or governed well enough that units remain meaningful rather than arbitrary noise.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: The codebook can be curated, learned, pruned, or governed well enough that units remain meaningful rather than arbitrary noise. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The codebook can be curated, learned, pruned, or governed well enough that units remain meaningful rather than arbitrary noise."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "The codebook can be curated, learned, pruned, or governed well enough that units remain meaningful rather than arbitrary noise."}, {"display_text": "Errors from false activation, missed activation, or activation collision can be detected and corrected.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this deployment constraint: Errors from false activation, missed activation, or activation collision can be detected and corrected. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Errors from false activation, missed activation, or activation collision can be detected and corrected."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 8, "text": "Errors from false activation, missed activation, or activation collision can be detected and corrected."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 64, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-064", "ledger_sha256": "0551bef369f0597477ad47e432aa371a73d34864023eea7203824dcb33d3d0f9"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Specialization Boundary and Reintegration Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:specialization_boundary_and_reintegration_design", "slug": "specialization_boundary_and_reintegration_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 3, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 1, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system could gain efficiency by letting different agents concentrate on narrower tasks, but the specialization boundary is either implicit, too coarse, too narrow, misallocated, or poorly reintegrated. The resulting system risks handoff loss, stovepiping, single-specialist bottlenecks, local optimization, brittle expertise, or inability to adapt when demand changes.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system could gain efficiency by letting different agents concentrate on narrower tasks, but the specialization boundary is either implicit, too coarse, too narrow, misallocated, or poorly reintegrated. The resulting system risks handoff loss, stovepiping, single-specialist bottlenecks, local optimization, brittle expertise, or inability to adapt when demand changes."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P100-C15", "dnf": [], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [], "predicate": "Repeated task families exist.", "resolution": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RESIDUAL", "semantic_scope": "NON_ABSTRACTION", "structural_head": "task families recur", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P100-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A design pattern can recur without differentiated agents.", "slug": "design_patterns"}], "residual_id": "r:specialization_boundary_and_reintegration_design:b064_a06_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b064_a06_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Repeated task families exist. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Repeated task families exist"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RECLASSIFIED", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 1, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A design pattern can recur without differentiated agents.", "slug": "design_patterns"}], "normalized_requirement": "Repeated task families exist", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RECLASSIFIED", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later candidate-blind atomization classified this remainder as a threshold, parameter, materiality test, or other non-abstraction rather than a catalog gap."}, "predicate": "Repeated task families exist", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Fragmentation can divide identical capabilities by organization rather than specialization.", "slug": "systemic_fragmentation"}], "residual_id": "r:specialization_boundary_and_reintegration_design:b064_a06_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b064_a06_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Agent capabilities differ or can diverge. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Agent capabilities differ or can diverge"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Fragmentation can divide identical capabilities by organization rather than specialization.", "slug": "systemic_fragmentation"}], "normalized_requirement": "Agent capabilities differ or can diverge", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Agent capabilities differ or can diverge", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P101-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve plural output roles rather than a single undifferentiated result.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "At least two outputs are produced by differentiated work or components.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail that the outputs depend on one another or must be reintegrated.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The outputs are interdependent.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve continued interdependence rather than only a temporary production-stage relation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The interdependence remains after the outputs are differentiated.", "type": "TIMING"}], "predicate": "Outputs remain interdependent.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "outputs remain interdependent", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P101-C01-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Boundary-state loss can occur between modules whose outputs are otherwise independent.", "slug": "boundary_state_loss"}], "residual_id": "r:specialization_boundary_and_reintegration_design:b064_a06_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b064_a06_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Outputs remain interdependent. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Outputs remain interdependent"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "If the plans were independent after production, all could be realized without the binding integration mechanism whose absence defines the disconnect.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "S&OP Disconnect", "one_liner": "Diagnose a firm's downstream execution crises as an upstream planning defect — separate functions each holding an internally sound but mutually incompatible plan for the same future, because no binding forum reconciles them before commitments are taken.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:s_op_disconnect", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "s_op_disconnect"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "s_op_disconnect", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P101-C01-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every complete S&OP-disconnect instance entails differentiated outputs whose interdependence persists after their separate production."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Outputs remain interdependent", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P101-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a specialization boundary and the placement choice that defines it.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A system has a specialization boundary whose placement can vary.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail a directional effect of boundary placement on performance.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Changing the boundary's placement changes system performance.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Placement of a specialization boundary changes system performance.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "specialization-boundary placement changes performance", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P101-C02-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Maneuver does not entail specialization boundaries.", "slug": "maneuver"}], "residual_id": "r:specialization_boundary_and_reintegration_design:b064_a06_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b064_a06_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Boundary placement changes performance. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Boundary placement changes performance"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "An interface split that did not change client dependency or change impact would lack the exact costs and remedy defining interface segregation.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Interface segregation principle", "one_liner": "The SOLID rule that clients should not depend on interface methods they do not use — decompose a fat interface into role-specific ones sized to each consumer's usage footprint, so a contract change's blast radius is read off the boundary rather than the call graph.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:interface_segregation_principle", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "interface_segregation_principle"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "interface_segregation_principle", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P101-C02-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record necessarily ties a variable specialization boundary to system performance."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Boundary placement changes performance", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P101-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve knowledge and its concentration rather than merely specialized work.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Operationally relevant knowledge is concentrated in a limited locus or set of actors.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail generation of risk by the concentration without requiring that harm has already occurred.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The knowledge concentration creates risk.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Concentration of knowledge creates risk.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "concentrated knowledge creates risk", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P101-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Fragmentation can distribute rather than concentrate knowledge.", "slug": "systemic_fragmentation"}], "residual_id": "r:specialization_boundary_and_reintegration_design:b064_a06_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b064_a06_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Knowledge concentration creates risk. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Knowledge concentration creates risk"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "If losing the knowledgeable people did not threaten continuity, the project would not have the stated bus factor.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Bus Factor", "one_liner": "The minimum number of team members whose sudden simultaneous loss would halt a project — a per-capability count of how many people could take a subsystem, credential, or relationship over tomorrow, exposing where tacit human knowledge is dangerously concentrated.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:bus_factor", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "bus_factor"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "bus_factor", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P101-C03-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every complete bus-factor instance entails concentrated operational knowledge and resulting risk."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Knowledge concentration creates risk", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Environment or demand can shift.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Environment or demand can shift. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Environment or demand can shift"]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Environment or demand can shift"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 64, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-064", "ledger_sha256": "0551bef369f0597477ad47e432aa371a73d34864023eea7203824dcb33d3d0f9"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Specification-to-Execution Lowering", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:specification_to_execution_lowering", "slug": "specification_to_execution_lowering"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A desired behavior, rule, model, policy, or outcome is stated at an abstract level, but action requires concrete primitives, sequence, state, resource choices, exceptions, and control flow. Teams often bridge that gap through undocumented interpretation or one-off implementation. The resulting artifact may run, yet there is no durable answer to whether it satisfies the source, which assumptions entered during translation, which obligations were lost, or how a source change should propagate. Conversely, naive automation may generate consistent artifacts that consistently encode the wrong semantics. The structural problem is the absence of a governed, evidence-bearing level shift from what is wanted to how it is executed.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A desired behavior, rule, model, policy, or outcome is stated at an abstract level, but action requires concrete primitives, sequence, state, resource choices, exceptions, and control flow. Teams often bridge that gap through undocumented interpretation or one-off implementation. The resulting artifact may run, yet there is no durable answer to whether it satisfies the source, which assumptions entered during translation, which obligations were lost, or how a source change should propagate. Conversely, naive automation may generate consistent artifacts that consistently encode the wrong semantics. The structural problem is the absence of a governed, evidence-bearing level shift from what is wanted to how it is executed."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Operationalization translates an abstract specification or policy into repeatable executable or measurable procedures.", "role_mapping": "Source specification -> abstract construct; execution -> operational definition.", "slug": "operationalization", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b064_a07_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "High-level specifications preserve intent, portability, and design freedom but omit executable detail; low-level artifacts are concrete and runnable but can bury meaning in substrate-specific choices. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A specification, policy, model, query, interface, or set of constraints must be made executable repeatedly or at scale.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A specification, policy, model, query, interface, or set of constraints must be made executable repeatedly or at scale.", "High-level specifications preserve intent, portability, and design freedom but omit executable detail; low-level artifacts are concrete and runnable but can bury meaning in substrate-specific choices."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Operationalization", "one_liner": "A specification of what is wanted is mechanically lowered into an executable how, under a correctness contract relating the two.", "page_ref": "prime:operationalization", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source specification -> abstract construct; execution -> operational definition.", "slug": "operationalization", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Operationalization translates an abstract specification or policy into repeatable executable or measurable procedures."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A specification, policy, model, query, interface, or set of constraints must be made executable repeatedly or at scale.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The target procedure necessarily uses concrete primitives absent from the source-level abstraction.", "role_mapping": "Source -> abstract rule; substrate primitives -> operations.", "slug": "operationalization", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b064_a07_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Lowering must add determinacy without inventing unauthorized intent, and it must exploit the target without violating the source-level correctness envelope. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The target substrate has lower-level primitives and constraints that are not expressed directly in the source.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The target substrate has lower-level primitives and constraints that are not expressed directly in the source.", "Lowering must add determinacy without inventing unauthorized intent, and it must exploit the target without violating the source-level correctness envelope."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Operationalization", "one_liner": "A specification of what is wanted is mechanically lowered into an executable how, under a correctness contract relating the two.", "page_ref": "prime:operationalization", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source -> abstract rule; substrate primitives -> operations.", "slug": "operationalization", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The target procedure necessarily uses concrete primitives absent from the source-level abstraction."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The target substrate has lower-level primitives and constraints that are not expressed directly in the source.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An operational definition can have one unambiguous implementation.", "slug": "operationalization"}], "residual_id": "r:specification_to_execution_lowering:b064_a07_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b064_a07_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Multiple plausible implementations exist and the admissible freedom must be bounded. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Multiple plausible implementations exist and the admissible freedom must be bounded."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An operational definition can have one unambiguous implementation.", "slug": "operationalization"}], "normalized_requirement": "Multiple plausible implementations exist and the admissible freedom must be bounded.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Multiple plausible implementations exist and the admissible freedom must be bounded.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P101-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve one source and multiple artifacts downstream of that source.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A governing source has several downstream artifacts derived from it.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail source-to-artifact propagation in the stated downstream direction.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "A change in the source propagates to the downstream artifacts.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the should modality on propagation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The propagation is a normative requirement rather than an asserted universal actuality.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve predictability of the propagation, not merely eventual manual consistency.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The required propagation is predictable.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve multiplicity across several downstream artifacts rather than only one derivative.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The propagation covers several downstream artifacts.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}], "predicate": "A source change should propagate predictably to several downstream artifacts.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "source changes should propagate predictably to multiple downstream artifacts", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P101-C04-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Operationalization can be maintained manually in one artifact.", "slug": "operationalization"}], "residual_id": "r:specification_to_execution_lowering:b064_a07_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b064_a07_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The resulting artifact may run, yet there is no durable answer to whether it satisfies the source, which assumptions entered during translation, which obligations were lost, or how a source change should propagate. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Source changes should propagate predictably across several downstream artifacts.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Source changes should propagate predictably across several downstream artifacts.", "The resulting artifact may run, yet there is no durable answer to whether it satisfies the source, which assumptions entered during translation, which obligations were lost, or how a source change should propagate."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Operationalization can be maintained manually in one artifact.", "slug": "operationalization"}], "normalized_requirement": "Source changes should propagate predictably across several downstream artifacts.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Source changes should propagate predictably across several downstream artifacts.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A defensible operationalization preserves an explainable mapping from concrete operations to the source construct.", "role_mapping": "Implementation choice -> operational rule; reviewer concept -> source specification.", "slug": "operationalization", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b064_a07_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Lowering must add determinacy without inventing unauthorized intent, and it must exploit the target without violating the source-level correctness envelope. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Implementation choices must remain explainable to reviewers who reason at the source level.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Implementation choices must remain explainable to reviewers who reason at the source level.", "Lowering must add determinacy without inventing unauthorized intent, and it must exploit the target without violating the source-level correctness envelope."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Operationalization", "one_liner": "A specification of what is wanted is mechanically lowered into an executable how, under a correctness contract relating the two.", "page_ref": "prime:operationalization", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Implementation choice -> operational rule; reviewer concept -> source specification.", "slug": "operationalization", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A defensible operationalization preserves an explainable mapping from concrete operations to the source construct."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Implementation choices must remain explainable to reviewers who reason at the source level.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Explicit preconditions, outcomes, tolerances, and exceptions make the abstract contract operationally checkable.", "role_mapping": "Checkable clauses -> operational criteria.", "slug": "operationalization", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b064_a07_c8", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A desired behavior, rule, model, policy, or outcome is stated at an abstract level, but action requires concrete primitives, sequence, state, resource choices, exceptions, and control flow. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The specification contains invariants, preconditions, outcomes, tolerances, or exceptions that can be checked.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The specification contains invariants, preconditions, outcomes, tolerances, or exceptions that can be checked.", "A desired behavior, rule, model, policy, or outcome is stated at an abstract level, but action requires concrete primitives, sequence, state, resource choices, exceptions, and control flow."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Operationalization", "one_liner": "A specification of what is wanted is mechanically lowered into an executable how, under a correctness contract relating the two.", "page_ref": "prime:operationalization", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Checkable clauses -> operational criteria.", "slug": "operationalization", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Explicit preconditions, outcomes, tolerances, and exceptions make the abstract contract operationally checkable."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The specification contains invariants, preconditions, outcomes, tolerances, or exceptions that can be checked.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [8], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Correctness, safety, compliance, interoperability, or auditability matters beyond mere successful execution.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Correctness, safety, compliance, interoperability, or auditability matters beyond mere successful execution. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Correctness, safety, compliance, interoperability, or auditability matters beyond mere successful execution."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Correctness, safety, compliance, interoperability, or auditability matters beyond mere successful execution."}, {"display_text": "A generator, compiler, interpreter, solver, rules engine, or synthesis tool can automate meaningful portions of the translation.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: A generator, compiler, interpreter, solver, rules engine, or synthesis tool can automate meaningful portions of the translation. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A generator, compiler, interpreter, solver, rules engine, or synthesis tool can automate meaningful portions of the translation."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "A generator, compiler, interpreter, solver, rules engine, or synthesis tool can automate meaningful portions of the translation."}, {"display_text": "Manual implementation has produced drift, duplication, inconsistent defaults, or weak traceability.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Manual implementation has produced drift, duplication, inconsistent defaults, or weak traceability. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [9], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Manual implementation has produced drift, duplication, inconsistent defaults, or weak traceability."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 9, "text": "Manual implementation has produced drift, duplication, inconsistent defaults, or weak traceability."}, {"display_text": "Operational evidence can be fed back to test assumptions without silently redefining the source contract.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The resulting artifact may run, yet there is no durable answer to whether it satisfies the source, which assumptions entered during translation, which obligations were lost, or how a source change should propagate. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: Operational evidence can be fed back to test assumptions without silently redefining the source contract. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [10], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Operational evidence can be fed back to test assumptions without silently redefining the source contract.", "The resulting artifact may run, yet there is no durable answer to whether it satisfies the source, which assumptions entered during translation, which obligations were lost, or how a source change should propagate."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 10, "text": "Operational evidence can be fed back to test assumptions without silently redefining the source contract."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 64, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-064", "ledger_sha256": "0551bef369f0597477ad47e432aa371a73d34864023eea7203824dcb33d3d0f9"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Speech-Act Clarification", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:speech_act_clarification", "slug": "speech_act_clarification"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 5, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a mismatch between sentence content and performed action. Participants hear the same utterance but attach different consequences to it. One person hears “I’ll look into it” as a firm commitment; another hears it as tentative intent. One team hears “approved” as authorization to proceed; another sees it as an informal opinion. One party treats silence as consent while another treats it as non-response.\n\nThis mismatch happens because communication carries several layers at once. Words have literal content, social relationship meaning, institutional standing, and action force. When the action layer remains implicit, the utterance becomes a weak substitute for a decision record, consent process, commitment register, or authority check.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Participants focus on the literal content of an utterance while disagreeing about the action it performed: suggestion or decision, request or order, promise or aspiration, consent or awareness, apology or explanation, declaration or commentary."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Speech-act theory covers utterances whose illocutionary act creates practical consequences.", "role_mapping": "Phrase or signature -> locution; created consequence -> illocution.", "slug": "speech_act_theory_illocution_perlocution", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b064_a08_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The expression may be spoken language, written policy, a signature, a click, a workflow approval, a meeting statement, a public declaration, or a ceremonial phrase. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A phrase, signature, click, meeting statement, policy clause, or public announcement is expected to create practical consequences.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A phrase, signature, click, meeting statement, policy clause, or public announcement is expected to create practical consequences.", "The expression may be spoken language, written policy, a signature, a click, a workflow approval, a meeting statement, a public declaration, or a ceremonial phrase."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Speech Act Theory (Illocution, Perlocution)", "one_liner": "Language as action.", "page_ref": "prime:speech_act_theory_illocution_perlocution", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Phrase or signature -> locution; created consequence -> illocution.", "slug": "speech_act_theory_illocution_perlocution", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Speech-act theory covers utterances whose illocutionary act creates practical consequences."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A phrase, signature, click, meeting statement, policy clause, or public announcement is expected to create practical consequences.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Felicity and authority conditions determine whether a declaration, consent, command, or promise succeeds.", "role_mapping": "Speaker -> agent; authority -> felicity condition.", "slug": "speech_act_theory_illocution_perlocution", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b064_a08_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The same words can report, request, authorize, promise, refuse, consent, apologize, or declare depending on role, context, authority, and uptake. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The speaker, author, signer, or system may or may not have authority to bind, approve, consent, command, or declare.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The speaker, author, signer, or system may or may not have authority to bind, approve, consent, command, or declare.", "The same words can report, request, authorize, promise, refuse, consent, apologize, or declare depending on role, context, authority, and uptake."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Speech Act Theory (Illocution, Perlocution)", "one_liner": "Language as action.", "page_ref": "prime:speech_act_theory_illocution_perlocution", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Speaker -> agent; authority -> felicity condition.", "slug": "speech_act_theory_illocution_perlocution", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Felicity and authority conditions determine whether a declaration, consent, command, or promise succeeds."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The speaker, author, signer, or system may or may not have authority to bind, approve, consent, command, or declare.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The recipient must identify the act type—permission, obligation, warning, refusal, or assertion—not wording alone.", "role_mapping": "Recipient interpretation -> illocutionary force.", "slug": "speech_act_theory_illocution_perlocution", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b064_a08_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A recipient must decide whether they are obligated, permitted, warned, released, assigned, refusing, accepting, or merely informed. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A recipient must decide whether they are obligated, permitted, warned, released, assigned, refusing, accepting, or merely informed."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Speech Act Theory (Illocution, Perlocution)", "one_liner": "Language as action.", "page_ref": "prime:speech_act_theory_illocution_perlocution", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Recipient interpretation -> illocutionary force.", "slug": "speech_act_theory_illocution_perlocution", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The recipient must identify the act type—permission, obligation, warning, refusal, or assertion—not wording alone."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A recipient must decide whether they are obligated, permitted, warned, released, assigned, refusing, accepting, or merely informed.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The same locution can perform different acts under different roles and institutional contexts.", "role_mapping": "Wording -> locution; setting -> force context.", "slug": "speech_act_theory_illocution_perlocution", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b064_a08_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Words have literal content, social relationship meaning, institutional standing, and action force. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The same wording could function differently depending on setting, role, relationship, ritual, policy, or institutional process.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The same wording could function differently depending on setting, role, relationship, ritual, policy, or institutional process.", "Words have literal content, social relationship meaning, institutional standing, and action force."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Speech Act Theory (Illocution, Perlocution)", "one_liner": "Language as action.", "page_ref": "prime:speech_act_theory_illocution_perlocution", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Wording -> locution; setting -> force context.", "slug": "speech_act_theory_illocution_perlocution", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The same locution can perform different acts under different roles and institutional contexts."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The same wording could function differently depending on setting, role, relationship, ritual, policy, or institutional process.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The theory explicitly distinguishes utterance content from the act performed in uttering it.", "role_mapping": "What was said -> locution; what was done -> illocution.", "slug": "speech_act_theory_illocution_perlocution", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b064_a08_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A record must show not merely what was said, but what was done by saying it. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A record must show not merely what was said, but what was done by saying it."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Speech Act Theory (Illocution, Perlocution)", "one_liner": "Language as action.", "page_ref": "prime:speech_act_theory_illocution_perlocution", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "What was said -> locution; what was done -> illocution.", "slug": "speech_act_theory_illocution_perlocution", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The theory explicitly distinguishes utterance content from the act performed in uttering it."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A record must show not merely what was said, but what was done by saying it.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 64, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-064", "ledger_sha256": "0551bef369f0597477ad47e432aa371a73d34864023eea7203824dcb33d3d0f9"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Stage-Gate Progression", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:stage_gate_progression", "slug": "stage_gate_progression"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 5, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is premature progression through a staged system. The process has dependencies, but the transition boundary does not enforce them. Later stages inherit unresolved defects, missing context, unsafe states, invalid assumptions, or incomplete work.\n\nThe resulting failures often look like downstream incompetence even when they are upstream readiness failures. A support team struggles because a launch was not operationally ready. A reviewer rejects a proposal because earlier scoping was incomplete. A learner fails an advanced task because prerequisite competence was never demonstrated. A manufacturing station discovers a defect after it has been embedded in a larger assembly.\n\nThe deeper tension is between flow and readiness. A system that never moves forward stalls. A system that moves forward too easily pushes defects and risk downstream. Stage-Gate Progression introduces controlled friction at the boundary so flow continues only when the next stage can responsibly receive the item.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A staged process allows items, decisions, people, materials, or commitments to move downstream before prerequisite conditions are satisfied. Downstream actors then inherit defects, missing context, unsafe states, ambiguous authority, or unresolved uncertainty that should have been handled earlier."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A stage-gate process requires a later stage to depend on evidence or approval from an earlier gate.", "role_mapping": "Earlier output -> gate evidence; later stage -> gated work.", "slug": "stage_gate_process", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b064_a09_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Later stages inherit unresolved defects, missing context, unsafe states, invalid assumptions, or incomplete work. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A later stage depends on the completion, quality, safety, competence, authorization, or evidence produced by an earlier stage.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A later stage depends on the completion, quality, safety, competence, authorization, or evidence produced by an earlier stage.", "Later stages inherit unresolved defects, missing context, unsafe states, invalid assumptions, or incomplete work."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Stage Gate Process", "one_liner": "Partition a long commitment into evidence-gated stages with escalating commitment and a funnel of kills.", "page_ref": "prime:stage_gate_process", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Earlier output -> gate evidence; later stage -> gated work.", "slug": "stage_gate_process", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A stage-gate process requires a later stage to depend on evidence or approval from an earlier gate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A later stage depends on the completion, quality, safety, competence, authorization, or evidence produced by an earlier stage.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Gates exist because premature progression commits resources or propagates defects downstream.", "role_mapping": "Premature movement -> gate bypass; cost or risk -> protected consequence.", "slug": "stage_gate_process", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b064_a09_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The structural problem is premature progression through a staged system. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Premature progression creates costly rework, downstream overload, safety risk, reputational risk, unfair evaluation, or irreversible commitment.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Premature progression creates costly rework, downstream overload, safety risk, reputational risk, unfair evaluation, or irreversible commitment.", "The structural problem is premature progression through a staged system."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Stage Gate Process", "one_liner": "Partition a long commitment into evidence-gated stages with escalating commitment and a funnel of kills.", "page_ref": "prime:stage_gate_process", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Premature movement -> gate bypass; cost or risk -> protected consequence.", "slug": "stage_gate_process", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Gates exist because premature progression commits resources or propagates defects downstream."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Premature progression creates costly rework, downstream overload, safety risk, reputational risk, unfair evaluation, or irreversible commitment.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A gate requires explicit shared criteria for ready, safe, validated, or approved status.", "role_mapping": "Readiness dispute -> gate criteria.", "slug": "stage_gate_process", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b064_a09_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Participants disagree about what counts as ready, done, safe, approved, validated, or mature enough to proceed. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Participants disagree about what counts as ready, done, safe, approved, validated, or mature enough to proceed."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Stage Gate Process", "one_liner": "Partition a long commitment into evidence-gated stages with escalating commitment and a funnel of kills.", "page_ref": "prime:stage_gate_process", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Readiness dispute -> gate criteria.", "slug": "stage_gate_process", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A gate requires explicit shared criteria for ready, safe, validated, or approved status."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Participants disagree about what counts as ready, done, safe, approved, validated, or mature enough to proceed.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Movement by urgency or persuasion rather than criteria is precisely an ungated staged process.", "role_mapping": "Existing stages -> pipeline; informal movement -> missing gate.", "slug": "stage_gate_process", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b064_a09_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The process may already have stages, but the movement between them is too informal. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The process already has stages, but movement between stages is governed by habit, urgency, hierarchy, optimism, or informal persuasion rather than explicit criteria.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The process already has stages, but movement between stages is governed by habit, urgency, hierarchy, optimism, or informal persuasion rather than explicit criteria.", "The process may already have stages, but the movement between them is too informal."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Stage Gate Process", "one_liner": "Partition a long commitment into evidence-gated stages with escalating commitment and a funnel of kills.", "page_ref": "prime:stage_gate_process", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Existing stages -> pipeline; informal movement -> missing gate.", "slug": "stage_gate_process", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Movement by urgency or persuasion rather than criteria is precisely an ungated staged process."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The process already has stages, but movement between stages is governed by habit, urgency, hierarchy, optimism, or informal persuasion rather than explicit criteria.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Late discovery after a costly boundary crossing is the failure gates are designed to prevent.", "role_mapping": "Boundary crossing -> stage transition; late failure -> escaped defect.", "slug": "stage_gate_process", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b064_a09_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "In each case, crossing the boundary changes the cost of error. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Failures are discovered too late, after the item has crossed a boundary where repair is more expensive or harmful.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Failures are discovered too late, after the item has crossed a boundary where repair is more expensive or harmful.", "In each case, crossing the boundary changes the cost of error."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Stage Gate Process", "one_liner": "Partition a long commitment into evidence-gated stages with escalating commitment and a funnel of kills.", "page_ref": "prime:stage_gate_process", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Boundary crossing -> stage transition; late failure -> escaped defect.", "slug": "stage_gate_process", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Late discovery after a costly boundary crossing is the failure gates are designed to prevent."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Failures are discovered too late, after the item has crossed a boundary where repair is more expensive or harmful.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 64, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-064", "ledger_sha256": "0551bef369f0597477ad47e432aa371a73d34864023eea7203824dcb33d3d0f9"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Stakeholder Mapping and Engagement", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:stakeholder_mapping_and_engagement", "slug": "stakeholder_mapping_and_engagement"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 0, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 0 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 0 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 0}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a mismatch between the official decision boundary and the real decision system. A small group may have formal authority, but consequences, knowledge, adoption power, trust, and legitimacy are distributed across a wider field. If that field is not made visible, decisions are optimized for the people in the room and then break when they meet the people affected by the decision.\n\nCommon symptoms include late-stage resistance, surprise stakeholder claims, implementation failures, consultation without impact, and high-power actors dominating the process while high-stake low-power groups remain invisible.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A decision or system change proceeds without clear visibility into who is affected, who can influence outcomes, whose needs or legitimacy claims matter, and how stakeholder input should alter the decision."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [], "condition_structure": "DISJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Distributed consequences.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A small group may have formal authority, but consequences, knowledge, adoption power, trust, and legitimacy are distributed across a wider field. In this archetype, the relevant source condition requiring clarification is: Distributed consequences. The wording is retained for source review rather than assigned a stronger semantic role.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Distributed consequences", "A small group may have formal authority, but consequences, knowledge, adoption power, trust, and legitimacy are distributed across a wider field."]}, "function": "MALFORMED", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because the source wording is not structurally clear enough to support a formal trigger role without clarification.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "Distributed consequences"}, {"display_text": "Hidden influence paths.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Decision makers need a bounded process, but the real decision system includes affected parties, knowledge holders, legitimacy sources, and influence paths that may sit outside the formal boundary. In this archetype, the relevant source condition requiring clarification is: Hidden influence paths. The wording is retained for source review rather than assigned a stronger semantic role.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Hidden influence paths", "Decision makers need a bounded process, but the real decision system includes affected parties, knowledge holders, legitimacy sources, and influence paths that may sit outside the formal boundary."]}, "function": "MALFORMED", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because the source wording is not structurally clear enough to support a formal trigger role without clarification.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "Hidden influence paths"}, {"display_text": "Contested legitimacy.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when implementation depends on cooperation, when legitimacy is contested, when frontline or lived knowledge is necessary, or when late opposition would be costly. In this archetype, the relevant source condition requiring clarification is: Contested legitimacy. The wording is retained for source review rather than assigned a stronger semantic role.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Contested legitimacy", "It is especially useful when implementation depends on cooperation, when legitimacy is contested, when frontline or lived knowledge is necessary, or when late opposition would be costly."]}, "function": "MALFORMED", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because the source wording is not structurally clear enough to support a formal trigger role without clarification.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Contested legitimacy"}, {"display_text": "Knowledge asymmetry.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this source condition requiring clarification: Knowledge asymmetry. The wording is retained for source review rather than assigned a stronger semantic role.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Knowledge asymmetry"]}, "function": "MALFORMED", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because the source wording is not structurally clear enough to support a formal trigger role without clarification.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Knowledge asymmetry"}, {"display_text": "Implementation dependence.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It also applies when the team already knows some stakeholders but has not separated interest, influence, legitimacy, representation, and implementation dependence. In this archetype, the relevant source condition requiring clarification is: Implementation dependence. The wording is retained for source review rather than assigned a stronger semantic role.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Implementation dependence", "It also applies when the team already knows some stakeholders but has not separated interest, influence, legitimacy, representation, and implementation dependence."]}, "function": "MALFORMED", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because the source wording is not structurally clear enough to support a formal trigger role without clarification.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Implementation dependence"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 64, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-064", "ledger_sha256": "0551bef369f0597477ad47e432aa371a73d34864023eea7203824dcb33d3d0f9"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Standardization-and-Simplification", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:standardization_and_simplification", "slug": "standardization_and_simplification"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 1, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A recurring task, workflow, interface, or physical process contains unnecessary variation in parts, forms, labels, procedures, options, or sequences, forcing users to translate, remember, choose, or improvise in ways that create avoidable errors.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A recurring task, workflow, interface, or physical process contains unnecessary variation in parts, forms, labels, procedures, options, or sequences, forcing users to translate, remember, choose, or improvise in ways that create avoidable errors."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P101-C05", "dnf": [], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [], "predicate": "The same or a similar task is performed repeatedly across multiple actors or settings.", "resolution": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RESIDUAL", "semantic_scope": "NON_ABSTRACTION", "structural_head": "same or similar task recurs across multiple actors or settings", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P101-C05-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Transfer can occur between nonrepeated tasks.", "slug": "transfer_of_learning"}], "residual_id": "r:standardization_and_simplification:b064_a11_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b064_a11_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The same or similar task is performed repeatedly by multiple people, shifts, teams, sites, or systems. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The same or similar task is performed repeatedly by multiple people, shifts, teams, sites, or systems."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RECLASSIFIED", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 1, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Transfer can occur between nonrepeated tasks.", "slug": "transfer_of_learning"}], "normalized_requirement": "The same or similar task is performed repeatedly by multiple people, shifts, teams, sites, or systems.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RECLASSIFIED", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later candidate-blind atomization classified this remainder as a threshold, parameter, materiality test, or other non-abstraction rather than a catalog gap."}, "predicate": "The same or similar task is performed repeatedly by multiple people, shifts, teams, sites, or systems.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Interpretive drift can occur despite identical formats.", "slug": "instrument_interpretive_drift"}], "residual_id": "r:standardization_and_simplification:b064_a11_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b064_a11_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A recurring task, workflow, interface, or physical process contains unnecessary variation in parts, forms, labels, procedures, options, or sequences, forcing users to translate, remember, choose, or improvise in ways that create avoidable errors. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Errors, rework, delays, omissions, wrong selections, or misunderstandings arise from inconsistent formats, procedures, labels, or option sets.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Errors, rework, delays, omissions, wrong selections, or misunderstandings arise from inconsistent formats, procedures, labels, or option sets.", "A recurring task, workflow, interface, or physical process contains unnecessary variation in parts, forms, labels, procedures, options, or sequences, forcing users to translate, remember, choose, or improvise in ways that create avoidable errors."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Interpretive drift can occur despite identical formats.", "slug": "instrument_interpretive_drift"}], "normalized_requirement": "Errors, rework, delays, omissions, wrong selections, or misunderstandings arise from inconsistent formats, procedures, labels, or option sets.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Errors, rework, delays, omissions, wrong selections, or misunderstandings arise from inconsistent formats, procedures, labels, or option sets.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P101-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve cases and the current local variation applied to them.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Cases are handled under locally varying forms or practices.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the most-cases quantifier rather than an isolated or merely possible excess.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Most cases require less than the full current amount of local variation.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail the directional excess of current variation over required variation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The amount of local variation currently present exceeds what those cases require.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "For most cases, current local variation exceeds what is required.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "current local variation exceeds need for most cases", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P101-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Unity and variety does not entail that variation is unnecessary.", "slug": "unity_variety"}], "residual_id": "r:standardization_and_simplification:b064_a11_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b064_a11_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Flexibility and local variation can serve real contextual needs, but uncontrolled variation increases the number of decisions, translations, and combinations where preventable errors can occur. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Most cases do not require the full amount of local variation currently present.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Most cases do not require the full amount of local variation currently present.", "Flexibility and local variation can serve real contextual needs, but uncontrolled variation increases the number of decisions, translations, and combinations where preventable errors can occur."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Unity and variety does not entail that variation is unnecessary.", "slug": "unity_variety"}], "normalized_requirement": "Most cases do not require the full amount of local variation currently present.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Most cases do not require the full amount of local variation currently present.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Refinement can increase complexity or specialization.", "slug": "refinement"}], "residual_id": "r:standardization_and_simplification:b064_a11_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b064_a11_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A recurring task, workflow, interface, or physical process contains unnecessary variation in parts, forms, labels, procedures, options, or sequences, forcing users to translate, remember, choose, or improvise in ways that create avoidable errors. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A shared standard, smaller option set, or simpler sequence could preserve necessary function while reducing ambiguity.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A shared standard, smaller option set, or simpler sequence could preserve necessary function while reducing ambiguity.", "A recurring task, workflow, interface, or physical process contains unnecessary variation in parts, forms, labels, procedures, options, or sequences, forcing users to translate, remember, choose, or improvise in ways that create avoidable errors."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Refinement can increase complexity or specialization.", "slug": "refinement"}], "normalized_requirement": "A shared standard, smaller option set, or simpler sequence could preserve necessary function while reducing ambiguity.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A shared standard, smaller option set, or simpler sequence could preserve necessary function while reducing ambiguity.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Users operate under time pressure, fatigue, interruption, multitasking, limited training, or cross-team handoff conditions.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Users operate under time pressure, fatigue, interruption, multitasking, limited training, or cross-team handoff conditions. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Users operate under time pressure, fatigue, interruption, multitasking, limited training, or cross-team handoff conditions."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Users operate under time pressure, fatigue, interruption, multitasking, limited training, or cross-team handoff conditions."}, {"display_text": "The cost of wrong selection, omitted information, wrong order, or wrong part is high enough to justify redesign.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The cost of wrong selection, omitted information, wrong order, or wrong part is high enough to justify redesign. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The cost of wrong selection, omitted information, wrong order, or wrong part is high enough to justify redesign."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The cost of wrong selection, omitted information, wrong order, or wrong part is high enough to justify redesign."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 64, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-064", "ledger_sha256": "0551bef369f0597477ad47e432aa371a73d34864023eea7203824dcb33d3d0f9"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "State Estimation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:state_estimation", "slug": "state_estimation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is an evidence-to-state gap. Observations exist, but they are not identical to the state that matters. They may be proxies, symptoms, traces, samples, reports, tests, or noisy readings. Without a state-estimation layer, people either react to isolated signals, ignore weak evidence, or pretend a raw metric is the underlying condition.\n\nThis creates recurring errors: treating symptoms instead of causes, routing cases to the wrong response, delaying action until the state is undeniable, or acting with false confidence because uncertainty is hidden.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "The relevant state is hidden, partially observed, noisy, delayed, or too costly to measure directly."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Observability asks whether an internal state can be inferred when it cannot be measured directly.", "role_mapping": "Hidden state -> system state; indirect access -> outputs.", "slug": "observability", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b064_a12_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The relevant state is hidden, partially observed, noisy, delayed, or too costly to measure directly. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The state that matters is hidden, latent, remote, distributed, or too costly to observe directly.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The state that matters is hidden, latent, remote, distributed, or too costly to observe directly.", "The relevant state is hidden, partially observed, noisy, delayed, or too costly to measure directly."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Observability", "one_liner": "Infer internal state externally.", "page_ref": "prime:observability", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Hidden state -> system state; indirect access -> outputs.", "slug": "observability", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Observability asks whether an internal state can be inferred when it cannot be measured directly."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The state that matters is hidden, latent, remote, distributed, or too costly to observe directly.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "State inference under observability relies on partial or noisy output signals rather than direct state inspection.", "role_mapping": "Signals -> observations; latent state -> inferred state.", "slug": "observability", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b064_a12_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The relevant state is hidden, partially observed, noisy, delayed, or too costly to measure directly. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Available signals are noisy, delayed, partial, biased, or indirectly related to the state.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Available signals are noisy, delayed, partial, biased, or indirectly related to the state.", "The relevant state is hidden, partially observed, noisy, delayed, or too costly to measure directly."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Observability", "one_liner": "Infer internal state externally.", "page_ref": "prime:observability", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Signals -> observations; latent state -> inferred state.", "slug": "observability", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "State inference under observability relies on partial or noisy output signals rather than direct state inspection."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Available signals are noisy, delayed, partial, biased, or indirectly related to the state.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Nonidentifiability occurs when different hidden states or parameters yield indistinguishable observations.", "role_mapping": "Hidden states -> candidate causes; symptoms -> observable outputs.", "slug": "identifiability", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b064_a12_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when different hidden states produce similar symptoms, when weak evidence accumulates over time, or when the system must decide whether to investigate, escalate, route, treat, defer, or adjust control. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Different hidden states can produce similar visible symptoms.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Different hidden states can produce similar visible symptoms.", "It is especially useful when different hidden states produce similar symptoms, when weak evidence accumulates over time, or when the system must decide whether to investigate, escalate, route, treat, defer, or adjust control."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Identifiability", "one_liner": "Whether an internal unknown can in principle be uniquely recovered from the observable signal a system makes available.", "page_ref": "prime:identifiability", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Hidden states -> candidate causes; symptoms -> observable outputs.", "slug": "identifiability", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Nonidentifiability occurs when different hidden states or parameters yield indistinguishable observations."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Different hidden states can produce similar visible symptoms.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Measurement uncertainty can exist with complete agreement.", "slug": "measurement_uncertainty"}], "residual_id": "r:state_estimation:b064_a12_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b064_a12_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Multiple observers or instruments disagree. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Multiple observers or instruments disagree."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Measurement uncertainty can exist with complete agreement.", "slug": "measurement_uncertainty"}], "normalized_requirement": "Multiple observers or instruments disagree.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Multiple observers or instruments disagree.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Actions have different costs under different hidden states.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The relevant state is hidden, partially observed, noisy, delayed, or too costly to measure directly. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Actions have different costs under different hidden states. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Actions have different costs under different hidden states.", "The relevant state is hidden, partially observed, noisy, delayed, or too costly to measure directly."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Actions have different costs under different hidden states."}, {"display_text": "Evidence arrives over time and the state can change over time.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The structural problem is an evidence-to-state gap. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Evidence arrives over time and the state can change over time. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Evidence arrives over time and the state can change over time.", "The structural problem is an evidence-to-state gap."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Evidence arrives over time and the state can change over time."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 64, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-064", "ledger_sha256": "0551bef369f0597477ad47e432aa371a73d34864023eea7203824dcb33d3d0f9"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Stationarity Validation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:stationarity_validation", "slug": "stationarity_validation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 2 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 2}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is **unvalidated extrapolation**. A system treats past behavior as predictive because the past was once useful, but the underlying process may no longer be the same. The old baseline can persist through dashboards, operating procedures, contracts, machine-learning models, policy thresholds, or institutional habit. Because the artifact still looks authoritative, users may not notice that the conditions that made it valid have changed.\n\nThe key risk is not merely error. It is confidence without comparability: decisions appear evidence-based while quietly relying on a historical regime that no longer describes the present.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Past baselines or model behavior guide current decisions even though the process generating observations may have changed."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "This branch preserves the complete remedy-free diagnostic route; goals, feasibility clauses, gates, deployment constraints, and supporting context remain outside the DNF."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Transferability overclaim necessarily reuses a result that was valid in an earlier regime beyond the scope conditions that warranted it, which entails reuse based on earlier apparent validity.", "role_mapping": "The locally warranted result maps to the model or baseline; the export step maps to current reuse under later conditions.", "slug": "transferability_overclaim", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "ext001_stationarity_validation_a01", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored trigger_conditions, structural_problem fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: A model, baseline, forecast, target, alert, report, or policy is reused because it appeared valid under earlier conditions.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A model, baseline, forecast, target, alert, report, or policy is reused because it appeared valid under earlier conditions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Transferability Overclaim", "one_liner": "A result established under specific scope conditions is exported beyond them with those conditions stripped, so the claim arrives at its new site shorn of the limits that made it true.", "page_ref": "prime:transferability_overclaim", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "The locally warranted result maps to the model or baseline; the export step maps to current reuse under later conditions.", "slug": "transferability_overclaim", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Transferability overclaim necessarily reuses a result that was valid in an earlier regime beyond the scope conditions that warranted it, which entails reuse based on earlier apparent validity."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A model, baseline, forecast, target, alert, report, or policy is reused because it appeared valid under earlier conditions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Intervention-induced model invalidation necessarily changes the behavior or data-generating process on which the prior relationship depended, which entails a changed generating process.", "role_mapping": "The endogenous regime shift maps to changed incentives, behavior, or constraints; the fitted relationship maps to the reused model or baseline.", "slug": "intervention_induced_model_invalidation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "ext001_stationarity_validation_a02", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored trigger_conditions, structural_problem fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: Changes in population, measurement, incentives, tools, environment, behavior, or constraints may have changed the generating process.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Changes in population, measurement, incentives, tools, environment, behavior, or constraints may have changed the generating process."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Intervention-Induced Model Invalidation", "one_liner": "When a model or calibrated relationship is used to choose or implement an intervention, the intervention changes the behavior or data-generating process the model described, so its pre-intervention parameters no longer transport to the regime it helped create.", "page_ref": "prime:intervention_induced_model_invalidation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "The endogenous regime shift maps to changed incentives, behavior, or constraints; the fitted relationship maps to the reused model or baseline.", "slug": "intervention_induced_model_invalidation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Intervention-induced model invalidation necessarily changes the behavior or data-generating process on which the prior relationship depended, which entails a changed generating process."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Changes in population, measurement, incentives, tools, environment, behavior, or constraints may have changed the generating process.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A false stability assumption could cause material harm.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored trigger_conditions, structural_problem fields; the source file was not modified. In this archetype, the relevant application gate is: A false stability assumption could cause material harm. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A false stability assumption could cause material harm.", "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored trigger_conditions, structural_problem fields; the source file was not modified."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "A false stability assumption could cause material harm."}, {"display_text": "The old baseline is embedded in institutional procedures or automation.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored trigger_conditions, structural_problem fields; the source file was not modified. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The old baseline is embedded in institutional procedures or automation. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The old baseline is embedded in institutional procedures or automation.", "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored trigger_conditions, structural_problem fields; the source file was not modified."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The old baseline is embedded in institutional procedures or automation."}, {"display_text": "Context changes faster than revalidation cycles.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored trigger_conditions, structural_problem fields; the source file was not modified. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Context changes faster than revalidation cycles. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Context changes faster than revalidation cycles.", "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored trigger_conditions, structural_problem fields; the source file was not modified."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Context changes faster than revalidation cycles."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"candidate_ledger_sha256": "96f72d2139077fd57bf795048ebef33b3fd574b20963170080ec916b5b3b92fe", "extension_id": "new-archetypes-extension-001", "ledger_id": "prime-production-v1.2-extension-001", "ledger_sha256": "9644520614744632d1d36da44b1acd77ce432852c6083eb871203521c166efce"}, "base_projection_sha256": "841e0c7f3cb8e8054475ad29a8a14745a416b4fc115559a44878b94292e673ec", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "ca09ed9fe1598ce7072755b530de5553f5ee0a7cd64ae82d9e4a4e2149a37788", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Stochastic Process Envelope Modeling", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:stochastic_process_envelope_modeling", "slug": "stochastic_process_envelope_modeling"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A dynamic uncertain quantity is treated as isolated noise, deterministic trend, or one-off forecast rather than an indexed random process with a governing law, dependence structure, observation error, and changing envelope. This leads to overreaction to single paths, underestimation of tail or transition risk, miscalibrated forecasts, and ungoverned model drift.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A dynamic uncertain quantity is treated as isolated noise, deterministic trend, or one-off forecast rather than an indexed random process with a governing law, dependence structure, observation error, and changing envelope. This leads to overreaction to single paths, underestimation of tail or transition risk, miscalibrated forecasts, and ungoverned model drift."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Intrinsic randomness remains after measurement error and deterministic drivers are separated.", "role_mapping": "Sequential outcomes -> random variables; intrinsic variation -> randomness.", "slug": "randomness", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b064_a13_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Outcomes unfold sequentially and randomness is intrinsic rather than a measurement nuisance. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Outcomes unfold sequentially and randomness is intrinsic rather than a measurement nuisance."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Randomness", "one_liner": "Model unpredictability.", "page_ref": "prime:randomness", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Sequential outcomes -> random variables; intrinsic variation -> randomness.", "slug": "randomness", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Intrinsic randomness remains after measurement error and deterministic drivers are separated."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Outcomes unfold sequentially and randomness is intrinsic rather than a measurement nuisance.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P101-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve both one realized trajectory and the larger possibility envelope.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A process has one realized path and a broader range of possible paths.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail substitution of one realization for the full range, not merely use of one sample.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The single realized path is mistaken for the whole possible-path range.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "A single realized path is being mistaken for the whole range of possible paths.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "single realized path is mistaken for possible-path range", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P101-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A random walk can be analyzed with its full path distribution.", "slug": "random_walk"}], "residual_id": "r:stochastic_process_envelope_modeling:b064_a13_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b064_a13_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This leads to overreaction to single paths, underestimation of tail or transition risk, miscalibrated forecasts, and ungoverned model drift. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A single realized path is being mistaken for the whole range of possible paths.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A single realized path is being mistaken for the whole range of possible paths.", "This leads to overreaction to single paths, underestimation of tail or transition risk, miscalibrated forecasts, and ungoverned model drift."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "If the unobserved adverse regime were not part of the possible distribution, the peso problem and its persistent premium would disappear.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Peso problem", "one_liner": "Explain an apparent pricing anomaly — persistent forward-rate bias or too-good Sharpe ratios — as a sampling artifact, in which the price correctly embeds a rare severe tail event that the finite observation window happened to omit.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:peso_problem", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "peso_problem"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "peso_problem", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P101-C07-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every complete peso-problem instance entails mistaking one tail-free realized history for the broader possible-path range."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A single realized path is being mistaken for the whole range of possible paths.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A Markov process can be used solely for a point prediction.", "slug": "markov_process"}], "residual_id": "r:stochastic_process_envelope_modeling:b064_a13_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b064_a13_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This leads to overreaction to single paths, underestimation of tail or transition risk, miscalibrated forecasts, and ungoverned model drift. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Forecast intervals, transition probabilities, or risk envelopes matter more than point predictions.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Forecast intervals, transition probabilities, or risk envelopes matter more than point predictions.", "This leads to overreaction to single paths, underestimation of tail or transition risk, miscalibrated forecasts, and ungoverned model drift."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A Markov process can be used solely for a point prediction.", "slug": "markov_process"}], "normalized_requirement": "Forecast intervals, transition probabilities, or risk envelopes matter more than point predictions.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Forecast intervals, transition probabilities, or risk envelopes matter more than point predictions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A Markov process necessarily represents probabilistic transitions among states over time.", "role_mapping": "States -> process states; irregular transition -> stochastic kernel.", "slug": "markov_process", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b064_a13_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Events arrive irregularly, states transition probabilistically, or values diffuse over time. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Events arrive irregularly, states transition probabilistically, or values diffuse over time."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Markov Process", "one_liner": "Future state depends only on the present, not the full history.", "page_ref": "prime:markov_process", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "States -> process states; irregular transition -> stochastic kernel.", "slug": "markov_process", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A Markov process necessarily represents probabilistic transitions among states over time."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Events arrive irregularly, states transition probabilistically, or values diffuse over time.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The next-state distribution necessarily depends on the current state, a structured summary of past influence.", "role_mapping": "Past influence -> current state; future distribution -> transition law.", "slug": "markov_process", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b064_a13_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Past values influence future distributions through memory, Markov structure, recurrence, or feedback. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Past values influence future distributions through memory, Markov structure, recurrence, or feedback."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Markov Process", "one_liner": "Future state depends only on the present, not the full history.", "page_ref": "prime:markov_process", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Past influence -> current state; future distribution -> transition law.", "slug": "markov_process", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The next-state distribution necessarily depends on the current state, a structured summary of past influence."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Past values influence future distributions through memory, Markov structure, recurrence, or feedback.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Concept drift is one explanation and does not entail stochastic variation alternatives.", "slug": "concept_drift"}], "residual_id": "r:stochastic_process_envelope_modeling:b064_a13_c7", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b064_a13_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: An observed change could be stochastic variation, data drift, concept drift, or a real regime shift. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["An observed change could be stochastic variation, data drift, concept drift, or a real regime shift."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Concept drift is one explanation and does not entail stochastic variation alternatives.", "slug": "concept_drift"}], "normalized_requirement": "An observed change could be stochastic variation, data drift, concept drift, or a real regime shift.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "An observed change could be stochastic variation, data drift, concept drift, or a real regime shift.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Stationarity assumptions are uncertain, contested, or likely to fail.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Stationarity assumptions are uncertain, contested, or likely to fail. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Stationarity assumptions are uncertain, contested, or likely to fail."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Stationarity assumptions are uncertain, contested, or likely to fail."}, {"display_text": "Decisions must be updated as paths are observed, not fixed from a one-time estimate.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: Decisions must be updated as paths are observed, not fixed from a one-time estimate. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Decisions must be updated as paths are observed, not fixed from a one-time estimate."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 8, "text": "Decisions must be updated as paths are observed, not fixed from a one-time estimate."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 64, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-064", "ledger_sha256": "0551bef369f0597477ad47e432aa371a73d34864023eea7203824dcb33d3d0f9"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Stochastic Process Modeling and Validation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:stochastic_process_modeling_and_validation", "slug": "stochastic_process_modeling_and_validation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem has four layers. First, the observable record is not the process. Sensors miss events, reports arrive late, measurements are rounded, and interventions alter what is seen. Second, randomness is heterogeneous: intrinsic variation, unresolved deterministic drivers, measurement error, and deliberate random inputs have different meanings. Third, dependence connects outcomes across time, space, entities, or states. Fourth, the law may change through trend, season, aging, policy, or regime transition.\n\nA weak model collapses these layers into independent noise around an average. That can look adequate in a static plot while failing catastrophically for the decision. Independence understates runs; a constant event rate understates bursts; a thin-tailed distribution understates extremes; a stationary law averages away transition risk; and an observation error treated as process volatility leads to the wrong control response.\n\nThe problem is not solved by selecting the most flexible family. Flexibility can hide misspecification in sample and fail out of sample. The challenge is to find the least elaborate structure that preserves the specific distributional and path features needed for use, while retaining enough diagnostic power to detect when that structure expires.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system produces variable sequences, arrivals, transitions, paths, or fields whose uncertainty changes what can be predicted or controlled. A deterministic average suppresses path variation, while an unstructured appeal to chance cannot support inference. The organization therefore needs a reusable model of how uncertainty evolves, not merely a random draw or a sample."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Unexplained repeated variation after known deterministic drivers is the condition for modeling intrinsic randomness.", "role_mapping": "Residual observations -> random component.", "slug": "randomness", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b064_a14_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Second, randomness is heterogeneous: intrinsic variation, unresolved deterministic drivers, measurement error, and deliberate random inputs have different meanings. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Repeated observations vary even after known deterministic drivers are represented.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Repeated observations vary even after known deterministic drivers are represented.", "Second, randomness is heterogeneous: intrinsic variation, unresolved deterministic drivers, measurement error, and deliberate random inputs have different meanings."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Randomness", "one_liner": "Model unpredictability.", "page_ref": "prime:randomness", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Residual observations -> random component.", "slug": "randomness", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Unexplained repeated variation after known deterministic drivers is the condition for modeling intrinsic randomness."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Repeated observations vary even after known deterministic drivers are represented.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An IID stochastic process has no order or persistence dependence.", "slug": "stochastic_process"}], "residual_id": "r:stochastic_process_modeling_and_validation:b064_a14_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b064_a14_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The order, spacing, persistence, or clustering of events matters, not only their marginal frequency. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The order, spacing, persistence, or clustering of events matters, not only their marginal frequency."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An IID stochastic process has no order or persistence dependence.", "slug": "stochastic_process"}], "normalized_requirement": "The order, spacing, persistence, or clustering of events matters, not only their marginal frequency.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The order, spacing, persistence, or clustering of events matters, not only their marginal frequency.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P101-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O9"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a decision role and the stochastic process whose behavior informs it.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A decision concerns an uncertain process.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail directional dependence of the decision on the named stochastic feature.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The decision depends on a process-path or distributional feature.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by dependence on multi-step paths.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The decision depends on multi-step paths.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by dependence on hitting times.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The decision depends on hitting times.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by dependence on queues.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The decision depends on queues.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by dependence on bursts.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The decision depends on bursts.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by dependence on runs.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The decision depends on runs.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by dependence on extremes.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The decision depends on extremes.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by dependence on tail events.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "The decision depends on tail events.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A decision depends on a multi-step, temporal, clustered, extreme, or tail feature of a stochastic process.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "decision depends on path-dependent or tail process feature", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P101-C08-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A Markov process can support one-step ordinary-state decisions.", "slug": "markov_process"}], "residual_id": "r:stochastic_process_modeling_and_validation:b064_a14_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b064_a14_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Independence understates runs; a constant event rate understates bursts; a thin-tailed distribution understates extremes; a stationary law averages away transition risk; and an observation error treated as process volatility leads to the wrong control response. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Decisions depend on multi-step paths, hitting times, queues, bursts, runs, extremes, or tail events.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Decisions depend on multi-step paths, hitting times, queues, bursts, runs, extremes, or tail events.", "Independence understates runs; a constant event rate understates bursts; a thin-tailed distribution understates extremes; a stationary law averages away transition risk; and an observation error treated as process volatility leads to the wrong control response."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "If the foreseeable rare extreme had no bearing on the chosen preparedness regime, the exact placement test and response routing would be idle.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Grey Swan", "one_liner": "A high-impact event whose category is foreseeable and reasoned about in advance but whose specific timing, magnitude, and form are unpredictable — the intermediate cell that calls for scenario planning and stress testing, not antifragility or actuarial insurance.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:grey_swan", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "grey_swan"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "grey_swan", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P101-C08-U1", "why_it_fits": "The candidate directly completes the tail-event branch; the source does not require a multistep path when O9 is selected."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Decisions depend on multi-step paths, hitting times, queues, bursts, runs, extremes, or tail events.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Randomness can be strongly identified rather than observationally tied with a deterministic account.", "slug": "randomness"}], "residual_id": "r:stochastic_process_modeling_and_validation:b064_a14_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b064_a14_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Competing deterministic and stochastic explanations fit short histories similarly. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Competing deterministic and stochastic explanations fit short histories similarly."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Randomness can be strongly identified rather than observationally tied with a deterministic account.", "slug": "randomness"}], "normalized_requirement": "Competing deterministic and stochastic explanations fit short histories similarly.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Competing deterministic and stochastic explanations fit short histories similarly.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P101-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve residuals and the use of randomness as their explanatory label.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A model or analysis produces residuals and labels their variation as randomness.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail absence of an independence test rather than a failed or passed test.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The residuals' independence is not tested.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail absence of calibration testing rather than generic model uncertainty.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The residuals' calibration is not tested.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Residuals are labeled random without testing their independence and calibration.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "randomness labels untested residual independence and calibration", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P101-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Randomness can be supported by calibrated independence tests.", "slug": "randomness"}], "residual_id": "r:stochastic_process_modeling_and_validation:b064_a14_c7", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b064_a14_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Randomness is being used as a residual label without testing whether residuals are independent and calibrated. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Randomness is being used as a residual label without testing whether residuals are independent and calibrated."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Randomness can be supported by calibrated independence tests.", "slug": "randomness"}], "normalized_requirement": "Randomness is being used as a residual label without testing whether residuals are independent and calibrated.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Randomness is being used as a residual label without testing whether residuals are independent and calibrated.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A simulator requires a defensible generative law rather than arbitrary noise injection.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: A simulator requires a defensible generative law rather than arbitrary noise injection. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A simulator requires a defensible generative law rather than arbitrary noise injection."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "A simulator requires a defensible generative law rather than arbitrary noise injection."}, {"display_text": "The process may change regime, violate stationarity, or carry long memory.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Fourth, the law may change through trend, season, aging, policy, or regime transition. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The process may change regime, violate stationarity, or carry long memory. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The process may change regime, violate stationarity, or carry long memory.", "Fourth, the law may change through trend, season, aging, policy, or regime transition."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The process may change regime, violate stationarity, or carry long memory."}, {"display_text": "Safety, capacity, finance, or reliability decisions require uncertainty across time or state transitions.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Third, dependence connects outcomes across time, space, entities, or states. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Safety, capacity, finance, or reliability decisions require uncertainty across time or state transitions. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Safety, capacity, finance, or reliability decisions require uncertainty across time or state transitions.", "Third, dependence connects outcomes across time, space, entities, or states."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 8, "text": "Safety, capacity, finance, or reliability decisions require uncertainty across time or state transitions."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 64, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-064", "ledger_sha256": "0551bef369f0597477ad47e432aa371a73d34864023eea7203824dcb33d3d0f9"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Stock-First Control Restoration", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:stock_first_control_restoration", "slug": "stock_first_control_restoration"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 6, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 6, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "6 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A shock pushes an underlying stock variable outside the range where marginal flow adjustments translate into outcomes, so actors misread near-zero response as a need to pull the same lever harder.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A shock pushes an underlying stock variable outside the range where marginal flow adjustments translate into outcomes, so actors misread near-zero response as a need to pull the same lever harder."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime begins with an intervention normally acting through a flow margin.", "role_mapping": "Dose or rate -> flow lever.", "slug": "stock_disabled_control", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b064_a15_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: An intervention normally acts through a flow margin such as dose, rate, staffing, price, throttle, credit, message volume, replenishment rate, or policy intensity. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["An intervention normally acts through a flow margin such as dose, rate, staffing, price, throttle, credit, message volume, replenishment rate, or policy intensity."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Stock Disabled Control", "one_liner": "A flow lever stops working when a shock pushes the system's stock variable outside the range where flow-margin nudges propagate; pulling harder fails until the stock is repaired.", "page_ref": "prime:stock_disabled_control", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Dose or rate -> flow lever.", "slug": "stock_disabled_control", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime begins with an intervention normally acting through a flow margin."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "An intervention normally acts through a flow margin such as dose, rate, staffing, price, throttle, credit, message volume, replenishment rate, or policy intensity.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Control becomes disabled when a relevant stock crosses a depletion, saturation, or damage threshold.", "role_mapping": "Trust inventory or capacity -> governing stock; threshold -> disablement.", "slug": "stock_disabled_control", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b064_a15_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A relevant stock has crossed a depletion, saturation, damage, trust, liquidity, inventory, capacity, or physiological threshold. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A relevant stock has crossed a depletion, saturation, damage, trust, liquidity, inventory, capacity, or physiological threshold."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Stock Disabled Control", "one_liner": "A flow lever stops working when a shock pushes the system's stock variable outside the range where flow-margin nudges propagate; pulling harder fails until the stock is repaired.", "page_ref": "prime:stock_disabled_control", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Trust inventory or capacity -> governing stock; threshold -> disablement.", "slug": "stock_disabled_control", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Control becomes disabled when a relevant stock crosses a depletion, saturation, or damage threshold."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A relevant stock has crossed a depletion, saturation, damage, trust, liquidity, inventory, capacity, or physiological threshold.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime necessarily produces sharply reduced, delayed, noisy, or reversed gain from the familiar lever.", "role_mapping": "Input-output gain -> control response.", "slug": "stock_disabled_control", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b064_a15_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The observed input-output gain of the familiar lever drops sharply or becomes noisy, delayed, or perverse. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The observed input-output gain of the familiar lever drops sharply or becomes noisy, delayed, or perverse."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Stock Disabled Control", "one_liner": "A flow lever stops working when a shock pushes the system's stock variable outside the range where flow-margin nudges propagate; pulling harder fails until the stock is repaired.", "page_ref": "prime:stock_disabled_control", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Input-output gain -> control response.", "slug": "stock_disabled_control", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime necessarily produces sharply reduced, delayed, noisy, or reversed gain from the familiar lever."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The observed input-output gain of the familiar lever drops sharply or becomes noisy, delayed, or perverse.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Operators retain the flow control while the hidden stock state determines whether it works.", "role_mapping": "Authority -> flow lever; hidden state -> stock.", "slug": "stock_disabled_control", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b064_a15_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A shock pushes an underlying stock variable outside the range where marginal flow adjustments translate into outcomes, so actors misread near-zero response as a need to pull the same lever harder. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Operators still possess authority over the flow lever but lack visibility into the stock state that governs responsiveness.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Operators still possess authority over the flow lever but lack visibility into the stock state that governs responsiveness.", "A shock pushes an underlying stock variable outside the range where marginal flow adjustments translate into outcomes, so actors misread near-zero response as a need to pull the same lever harder."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Stock Disabled Control", "one_liner": "A flow lever stops working when a shock pushes the system's stock variable outside the range where flow-margin nudges propagate; pulling harder fails until the stock is repaired.", "page_ref": "prime:stock_disabled_control", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Authority -> flow lever; hidden state -> stock.", "slug": "stock_disabled_control", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Operators retain the flow control while the hidden stock state determines whether it works."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Operators still possess authority over the flow lever but lack visibility into the stock state that governs responsiveness.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Pressure to escalate the ineffective flow is a defining control trap once stock damage is missed.", "role_mapping": "Escalation -> repeated lever use; diagnosis -> hidden stock.", "slug": "stock_disabled_control", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b064_a15_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Controllers are optimized to adjust flows, but the controllability of a flow often depends on stocks that change more slowly, fail less visibly, and require repair rather than stronger nudges. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Performance pressure rewards escalating the lever rather than pausing to diagnose stock damage.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Performance pressure rewards escalating the lever rather than pausing to diagnose stock damage.", "Controllers are optimized to adjust flows, but the controllability of a flow often depends on stocks that change more slowly, fail less visibly, and require repair rather than stronger nudges."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Stock Disabled Control", "one_liner": "A flow lever stops working when a shock pushes the system's stock variable outside the range where flow-margin nudges propagate; pulling harder fails until the stock is repaired.", "page_ref": "prime:stock_disabled_control", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Escalation -> repeated lever use; diagnosis -> hidden stock.", "slug": "stock_disabled_control", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Pressure to escalate the ineffective flow is a defining control trap once stock damage is missed."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Performance pressure rewards escalating the lever rather than pausing to diagnose stock damage.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Hysteresis means the stock must cross a restoration threshold before ordinary gain returns.", "role_mapping": "Repair -> stock recovery; ordinary control -> restored response.", "slug": "stock_disabled_control", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b064_a15_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Controllers are optimized to adjust flows, but the controllability of a flow often depends on stocks that change more slowly, fail less visibly, and require repair rather than stronger nudges. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The system has hysteresis: the stock must be repaired above a restoration threshold before ordinary control resumes.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The system has hysteresis: the stock must be repaired above a restoration threshold before ordinary control resumes.", "Controllers are optimized to adjust flows, but the controllability of a flow often depends on stocks that change more slowly, fail less visibly, and require repair rather than stronger nudges."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Stock Disabled Control", "one_liner": "A flow lever stops working when a shock pushes the system's stock variable outside the range where flow-margin nudges propagate; pulling harder fails until the stock is repaired.", "page_ref": "prime:stock_disabled_control", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Repair -> stock recovery; ordinary control -> restored response.", "slug": "stock_disabled_control", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Hysteresis means the stock must cross a restoration threshold before ordinary gain returns."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The system has hysteresis: the stock must be repaired above a restoration threshold before ordinary control resumes.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 64, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-064", "ledger_sha256": "0551bef369f0597477ad47e432aa371a73d34864023eea7203824dcb33d3d0f9"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Stock–Flow Accumulation Control", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:stock_flow_accumulation_control", "slug": "stock_flow_accumulation_control"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 1, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system treats buildup, depletion, backlog, burden, inventory, debt, exposure, risk, resource reserve, or environmental load as if it were the same object as the flows that create or drain it. Because the stock-flow distinction is blurred, interventions attack visible rates, anecdotes, or local symptoms while the accumulated level continues moving toward overload, scarcity, threshold crossing, or hidden displacement.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system treats buildup, depletion, backlog, burden, inventory, debt, exposure, risk, resource reserve, or environmental load as if it were the same object as the flows that create or drain it. Because the stock-flow distinction is blurred, interventions attack visible rates, anecdotes, or local symptoms while the accumulated level continues moving toward overload, scarcity, threshold crossing, or hidden displacement."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Accumulation necessarily concerns a quantity that persists and increases or depletes over time.", "role_mapping": "Persistent quantity -> stock; change over time -> accumulation.", "slug": "accumulation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b065_a01_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A quantity persists over time and can accumulate or deplete. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A quantity persists over time and can accumulate or deplete."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Accumulation", "one_liner": "A stock grows or shrinks as the time-integral of its net inflow minus outflow, so stocks and flows live on different objects and cannot be equated.", "page_ref": "prime:accumulation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Persistent quantity -> stock; change over time -> accumulation.", "slug": "accumulation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Accumulation necessarily concerns a quantity that persists and increases or depletes over time."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A quantity persists over time and can accumulate or deplete.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A stock accumulates as the integral balance of inflow and outflow, conversion, leakage, or decay.", "role_mapping": "Inflow and outflow -> stock-flow balance.", "slug": "accumulation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b065_a01_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: At least one inflow and one outflow, clearance, conversion, leakage, decay, or removal path affect the stock. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["At least one inflow and one outflow, clearance, conversion, leakage, decay, or removal path affect the stock."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Accumulation", "one_liner": "A stock grows or shrinks as the time-integral of its net inflow minus outflow, so stocks and flows live on different objects and cannot be equated.", "page_ref": "prime:accumulation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Inflow and outflow -> stock-flow balance.", "slug": "accumulation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A stock accumulates as the integral balance of inflow and outflow, conversion, leakage, or decay."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "At least one inflow and one outflow, clearance, conversion, leakage, decay, or removal path affect the stock.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The accumulated level is distinct from the instantaneous rate that changes it.", "role_mapping": "Stock level -> state; rate -> derivative flow.", "slug": "accumulation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b065_a01_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Good control requires linking the two without pretending that a rate is the stock or that a stock changes without time-integrated flow. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The stock level matters separately from the instantaneous rate that changes it.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The stock level matters separately from the instantaneous rate that changes it.", "Good control requires linking the two without pretending that a rate is the stock or that a stock changes without time-integrated flow."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Accumulation", "one_liner": "A stock grows or shrinks as the time-integral of its net inflow minus outflow, so stocks and flows live on different objects and cannot be equated.", "page_ref": "prime:accumulation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Stock level -> state; rate -> derivative flow.", "slug": "accumulation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The accumulated level is distinct from the instantaneous rate that changes it."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The stock level matters separately from the instantaneous rate that changes it.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P101-C10", "dnf": [], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [], "predicate": "A safe, useful, scarce, or risky stock band can be stated or bounded.", "resolution": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RESIDUAL", "semantic_scope": "NON_ABSTRACTION", "structural_head": "stock band is stateable or boundable", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P101-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A reserve can exist without an explicitly safe upper and lower band.", "slug": "reserve"}], "residual_id": "r:stock_flow_accumulation_control:b065_a01_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b065_a01_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A safe, useful, scarce, or risky stock band can be stated or bounded. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A safe, useful, scarce, or risky stock band can be stated or bounded."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RECLASSIFIED", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 1, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A reserve can exist without an explicitly safe upper and lower band.", "slug": "reserve"}], "normalized_requirement": "A safe, useful, scarce, or risky stock band can be stated or bounded.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RECLASSIFIED", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later candidate-blind atomization classified this remainder as a threshold, parameter, materiality test, or other non-abstraction rather than a catalog gap."}, "predicate": "A safe, useful, scarce, or risky stock band can be stated or bounded.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Clearance can be promptly observed with no hidden reservoir.", "slug": "clearance_rate"}], "residual_id": "r:stock_flow_accumulation_control:b065_a01_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b065_a01_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Flows are what people can often change immediately, but stocks are what carry memory, risk, capacity, depletion, and delay. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Delays, measurement cadence, or hidden reservoirs can make the stock diverge from expectations.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Delays, measurement cadence, or hidden reservoirs can make the stock diverge from expectations.", "Flows are what people can often change immediately, but stocks are what carry memory, risk, capacity, depletion, and delay."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Clearance can be promptly observed with no hidden reservoir.", "slug": "clearance_rate"}], "normalized_requirement": "Delays, measurement cadence, or hidden reservoirs can make the stock diverge from expectations.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Delays, measurement cadence, or hidden reservoirs can make the stock diverge from expectations.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Stakeholders are choosing between reducing inflow, increasing outflow, raising capacity, accelerating turnover, buffering variation, or changing thresholds.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: Stakeholders are choosing between reducing inflow, increasing outflow, raising capacity, accelerating turnover, buffering variation, or changing thresholds. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders are choosing between reducing inflow, increasing outflow, raising capacity, accelerating turnover, buffering variation, or changing thresholds."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Stakeholders are choosing between reducing inflow, increasing outflow, raising capacity, accelerating turnover, buffering variation, or changing thresholds."}, {"display_text": "The target prime is not already handled by a domain-specific accumulation archetype such as bioaccumulation prevention or stress accumulation monitoring.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this application gate: The target prime is not already handled by a domain-specific accumulation archetype such as bioaccumulation prevention or stress accumulation monitoring. It narrows when choosing or applying the archetype is warranted or decision-relevant.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The target prime is not already handled by a domain-specific accumulation archetype such as bioaccumulation prevention or stress accumulation monitoring."]}, "function": "APPLICATION_GATE", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it governs whether applying the archetype is appropriate or material, rather than defining the structural problem itself.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "The target prime is not already handled by a domain-specific accumulation archetype such as bioaccumulation prevention or stress accumulation monitoring."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 65, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-065", "ledger_sha256": "88a388b14afc2c1203840c289b66e7c3d00768892188a64a55989045fa3c59a3"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Strategic Caching", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:strategic_caching", "slug": "strategic_caching"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 0, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 0 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 0 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 0}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is repeated full-cost work. The system already has an answer, object, computation, template, or decision that could be reused, but each new request still travels the long path. This creates latency, wasted capacity, inconsistent local improvisation, and avoidable dependence on scarce upstream actors.\n\nA second problem often appears after informal caching begins: old shortcuts become convenient enough to be trusted, but not governed enough to be safe. The system then gets speed at the price of stale information, outdated precedents, or hidden divergence from the source of truth.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "The same information, resource, decision, computation, or artifact is repeatedly retrieved or recreated at unnecessary cost. The system pays the full search, access, coordination, or computation price each time even though prior results could be reused."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [], "condition_structure": "DISJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Demand repeats.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source states: Demand repeats. The normalized source condition requiring clarification is: Demand repeats. The wording is retained for source review rather than assigned a stronger semantic role.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["demand_repeats"]}, "function": "MALFORMED", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because the source wording is not structurally clear enough to support a formal trigger role without clarification.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "demand_repeats"}, {"display_text": "Miss cost is material.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is a weaker fit when each request is unique, when the cached material changes too quickly to govern, when safety or legality requires a live source check every time, or when storing and maintaining reusable items would cost more than recomputing them. In this archetype, the relevant source condition requiring clarification is: Miss cost is material. The wording is retained for source review rather than assigned a stronger semantic role.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["miss_cost_is_material", "It is a weaker fit when each request is unique, when the cached material changes too quickly to govern, when safety or legality requires a live source check every time, or when storing and maintaining reusable items would cost more than recomputing them."]}, "function": "MALFORMED", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because the source wording is not structurally clear enough to support a formal trigger role without clarification.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "miss_cost_is_material"}, {"display_text": "Reuse is safe enough.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A second problem often appears after informal caching begins: old shortcuts become convenient enough to be trusted, but not governed enough to be safe. In this archetype, the relevant source condition requiring clarification is: Reuse is safe enough. The wording is retained for source review rather than assigned a stronger semantic role.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["reuse_is_safe_enough", "A second problem often appears after informal caching begins: old shortcuts become convenient enough to be trusted, but not governed enough to be safe."]}, "function": "MALFORMED", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because the source wording is not structurally clear enough to support a formal trigger role without clarification.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "reuse_is_safe_enough"}, {"display_text": "Freshness can be governed.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source states: Freshness can be governed. The normalized source condition requiring clarification is: Freshness can be governed. The wording is retained for source review rather than assigned a stronger semantic role.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["freshness_can_be_governed"]}, "function": "MALFORMED", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because the source wording is not structurally clear enough to support a formal trigger role without clarification.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "freshness_can_be_governed"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 65, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-065", "ledger_sha256": "88a388b14afc2c1203840c289b66e7c3d00768892188a64a55989045fa3c59a3"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Strategic Juxtaposition", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:strategic_juxtaposition", "slug": "strategic_juxtaposition"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 2, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is **separated relational evidence**. Each item may be known, documented, or defensible on its own, yet the meaningful relation between items remains hidden because they are not presented in joint attention.\n\nThis separation can happen across time, disciplines, documents, interfaces, meetings, organizational units, narratives, or mental models. The result is a system where people make judgments from isolated snapshots. They miss the gap between stated intention and operational reality, the difference between a valid and invalid example, the similarity between a current problem and a past case, or the contradiction between two commitments.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Elements are being evaluated separately even though their relationship is the thing that matters. Because each item appears in its own context, stakeholders miss important differences, similarities, contradictions, trajectories, analogies, tradeoffs, or emergent meanings. The structural problem is not absence of information; it is separation of information that must be interpreted relationally."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Juxtaposition can be used for aesthetic contrast without a hidden relation dominating the elements.", "slug": "juxtaposition"}], "residual_id": "r:strategic_juxtaposition:b065_a03_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b065_a03_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use Strategic Juxtaposition when isolated evaluation hides the relation that matters. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A hidden relation matters more than any isolated element.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A hidden relation matters more than any isolated element.", "Use Strategic Juxtaposition when isolated evaluation hides the relation that matters."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Juxtaposition can be used for aesthetic contrast without a hidden relation dominating the elements.", "slug": "juxtaposition"}], "normalized_requirement": "A hidden relation matters more than any isolated element.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A hidden relation matters more than any isolated element.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P101-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a comparison relation with distinct comparands.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "At least two items, states, or representations can be compared.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the counterfactual would modality rather than assert that alteration has already occurred.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The comparison would alter an outcome.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when diagnosis would be altered.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The comparison would alter diagnosis.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when interpretation would be altered.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The comparison would alter interpretation.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when action would be altered.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The comparison would alter action.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A comparison would alter a diagnostic, interpretive, or action outcome.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "comparison would alter diagnosis interpretation or action", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P101-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Context-dependent preference need not alter diagnosis or action through explicit comparison.", "slug": "context_dependent_preference"}], "residual_id": "r:strategic_juxtaposition:b065_a03_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b065_a03_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A comparison would alter diagnosis, interpretation, or action. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A comparison would alter diagnosis, interpretation, or action."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "If recognizing the asymmetry did not change interpretation, the equal weighting would not constitute the exact false-equivalence error.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "False Equivalence", "one_liner": "The fallacy of treating two things as comparably weighted on the dimension a judgment turns on, when they in fact differ by an order of magnitude or by kind — by highlighting a genuine shared feature and suppressing the difference that actually controls.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:false_equivalence", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "false_equivalence"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "false_equivalence", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P101-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every complete false-equivalence instance supplies a comparison whose corrected interpretation differs."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "If the worse-case comparison did not alter action eligibility, the defining dismissal of the present problem would not occur.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Relative Privation", "one_liner": "The informal fallacy of dismissing a concern by pointing to a worse problem elsewhere, conflating severity-ranking with action-licensing — since ranking governs how much total attention a problem warrants, not whether it is eligible for any, unless the worse problem's resources are genuinely exclusive.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:relative_privation", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "relative_privation"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "relative_privation", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P101-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact fallacy directly completes the action branch, even though it does not need to alter diagnosis."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "If adjacency and ordering could not alter interpretation, the candidate's contrast-dependent clarity mechanism would be absent.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Sequential Clarity", "one_liner": "Judge how well each item in an ordered presentation stands out not by its own quality but by how much it contrasts with its immediate temporal neighbours inside the working-memory window.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:sequential_clarity", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "sequential_clarity"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "sequential_clarity", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P101-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record directly completes the interpretation branch through ordered comparison."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "If unpacking did not alter the assessed probability, the defining subadditivity contrast would not exist.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Subadditivity Effect", "one_liner": "Diagnose why the judged probability of an event named as a whole comes in reliably below the sum of judged probabilities for its named parts — because unpacking recruits more cognitive support — reading the known upward sign off which figure was solicited packed versus partitioned.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:subadditivity_effect", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "subadditivity_effect"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "subadditivity_effect", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P101-C11-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact packed-versus-unpacked comparison directly completes the interpretation branch."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A comparison would alter diagnosis, interpretation, or action.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P101-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve related evidence and its distribution across multiple representational loci, including the named locus types as manifestations.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Related evidence occupies multiple representational loci such as documents, screens, meetings, or mental models.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail dispersal by an existing practice rather than independent creation of unrelated evidence.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "An existing representational practice disperses the related evidence across those loci.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when existing communication disperses the related evidence.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Existing communication is the practice that disperses the evidence.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when existing analysis disperses the related evidence.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Existing analysis is the practice that disperses the evidence.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Existing communication or existing analysis disperses related evidence across documents, screens, meetings, or mental models.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "communication or analysis disperses related evidence across representations", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P101-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Representational mismatch can occur within one document.", "slug": "representational_structure_mismatch"}], "residual_id": "r:strategic_juxtaposition:b065_a03_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b065_a03_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This separation can happen across time, disciplines, documents, interfaces, meetings, organizational units, narratives, or mental models. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Existing communication or analysis disperses related evidence across documents, screens, meetings, or mental models.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Existing communication or analysis disperses related evidence across documents, screens, meetings, or mental models.", "This separation can happen across time, disciplines, documents, interfaces, meetings, organizational units, narratives, or mental models."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "If related evidence remained integrated rather than split among proliferating codes, the exact overcoding failure would be absent.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Overcoding", "one_liner": "The qualitative-research failure mode where coding fragments material below the phenomenon's legibility grain, actively severing the sequence and relational structure that gave coded phrases their meaning — diagnosed by whether meaning can be reconstructed from the codes alone.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:overcoding", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "overcoding"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "overcoding", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P101-C12-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record directly completes the analysis branch."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Existing communication or analysis disperses related evidence across documents, screens, meetings, or mental models.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Boundary navigation need not use juxtaposed cases.", "slug": "adversarial_boundary_navigation"}], "residual_id": "r:strategic_juxtaposition:b065_a03_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b065_a03_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "They miss the gap between stated intention and operational reality, the difference between a valid and invalid example, the similarity between a current problem and a past case, or the contradiction between two commitments. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A concept boundary is unclear until valid and invalid cases are seen together.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A concept boundary is unclear until valid and invalid cases are seen together.", "They miss the gap between stated intention and operational reality, the difference between a valid and invalid example, the similarity between a current problem and a past case, or the contradiction between two commitments."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Boundary navigation need not use juxtaposed cases.", "slug": "adversarial_boundary_navigation"}], "normalized_requirement": "A concept boundary is unclear until valid and invalid cases are seen together.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A concept boundary is unclear until valid and invalid cases are seen together.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Stakeholders are making judgments from isolated snapshots.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The result is a system where people make judgments from isolated snapshots. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Stakeholders are making judgments from isolated snapshots. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders are making judgments from isolated snapshots.", "The result is a system where people make judgments from isolated snapshots."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "Stakeholders are making judgments from isolated snapshots."}, {"display_text": "The elements can be placed in a fair enough shared frame.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Strategic juxtaposition balances these by placing elements together while adding a frame that preserves the relevant context. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: The elements can be placed in a fair enough shared frame. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The elements can be placed in a fair enough shared frame.", "Strategic juxtaposition balances these by placing elements together while adding a frame that preserves the relevant context."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The elements can be placed in a fair enough shared frame."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 65, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-065", "ledger_sha256": "88a388b14afc2c1203840c289b66e7c3d00768892188a64a55989045fa3c59a3"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Strategic Randomization and Exploitability Reduction", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:strategic_randomization_exploitability_reduction", "slug": "strategic_randomization_exploitability_reduction"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A decision maker faces an adaptive opponent, competitor, evader, or observer who can infer the next action from deterministic rules, habits, timing, visible signals, or leaked policy details, turning predictability into strategic disadvantage.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A decision maker faces an adaptive opponent, competitor, evader, or observer who can infer the next action from deterministic rules, habits, timing, visible signals, or leaked policy details, turning predictability into strategic disadvantage."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Mixed strategies are required when an opponent can exploit predictable next actions.", "role_mapping": "Opponent -> strategic responder; prediction -> exploitability.", "slug": "mixed_strategy", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b065_a04_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A decision maker faces an adaptive opponent, competitor, evader, or observer who can infer the next action from deterministic rules, habits, timing, visible signals, or leaked policy details, turning predictability into strategic disadvantage. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: An opponent benefits from anticipating where, when, how, or whether the actor will move next.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["An opponent benefits from anticipating where, when, how, or whether the actor will move next.", "A decision maker faces an adaptive opponent, competitor, evader, or observer who can infer the next action from deterministic rules, habits, timing, visible signals, or leaked policy details, turning predictability into strategic disadvantage."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Mixed Strategy", "one_liner": "Randomize over actions so an adversary cannot predict the next choice.", "page_ref": "prime:mixed_strategy", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Opponent -> strategic responder; prediction -> exploitability.", "slug": "mixed_strategy", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Mixed strategies are required when an opponent can exploit predictable next actions."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "An opponent benefits from anticipating where, when, how, or whether the actor will move next.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A mixed strategy assigns probabilities to multiple viable actions whose payoffs depend on the opponent.", "role_mapping": "Actions -> support; opponent adaptation -> payoff matrix.", "slug": "mixed_strategy", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b065_a04_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A decision maker faces an adaptive opponent, competitor, evader, or observer who can infer the next action from deterministic rules, habits, timing, visible signals, or leaked policy details, turning predictability into strategic disadvantage. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The actor has multiple viable actions, routes, timings, checks, offers, or responses whose relative value depends on opponent adaptation.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The actor has multiple viable actions, routes, timings, checks, offers, or responses whose relative value depends on opponent adaptation.", "A decision maker faces an adaptive opponent, competitor, evader, or observer who can infer the next action from deterministic rules, habits, timing, visible signals, or leaked policy details, turning predictability into strategic disadvantage."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Mixed Strategy", "one_liner": "Randomize over actions so an adversary cannot predict the next choice.", "page_ref": "prime:mixed_strategy", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Actions -> support; opponent adaptation -> payoff matrix.", "slug": "mixed_strategy", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A mixed strategy assigns probabilities to multiple viable actions whose payoffs depend on the opponent."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The actor has multiple viable actions, routes, timings, checks, offers, or responses whose relative value depends on opponent adaptation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Randomization removes exploitable regularity from a fixed learnable rule.", "role_mapping": "Fixed tactic -> pure strategy; random draw -> mixed policy.", "slug": "mixed_strategy", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b065_a04_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A fixed rule, schedule, priority order, favorite tactic, or visible threshold has become learnable. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A fixed rule, schedule, priority order, favorite tactic, or visible threshold has become learnable."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Mixed Strategy", "one_liner": "Randomize over actions so an adversary cannot predict the next choice.", "page_ref": "prime:mixed_strategy", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Fixed tactic -> pure strategy; random draw -> mixed policy.", "slug": "mixed_strategy", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Randomization removes exploitable regularity from a fixed learnable rule."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A fixed rule, schedule, priority order, favorite tactic, or visible threshold has become learnable.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The cost of being predicted is high enough to justify the complexity, communication, and accountability burden of randomization.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The cost of being predicted is high enough to justify the complexity, communication, and accountability burden of randomization. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The cost of being predicted is high enough to justify the complexity, communication, and accountability burden of randomization."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The cost of being predicted is high enough to justify the complexity, communication, and accountability burden of randomization."}, {"display_text": "Every action in the mixed support can be executed safely and legitimately, not merely named as a theoretical option.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this deployment constraint: Every action in the mixed support can be executed safely and legitimately, not merely named as a theoretical option. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Every action in the mixed support can be executed safely and legitimately, not merely named as a theoretical option."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Every action in the mixed support can be executed safely and legitimately, not merely named as a theoretical option."}, {"display_text": "Observers can see enough historical behavior to infer patterns, but not enough protected entropy to know the next draw.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A decision maker faces an adaptive opponent, competitor, evader, or observer who can infer the next action from deterministic rules, habits, timing, visible signals, or leaked policy details, turning predictability into strategic disadvantage. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Observers can see enough historical behavior to infer patterns, but not enough protected entropy to know the next draw. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Observers can see enough historical behavior to infer patterns, but not enough protected entropy to know the next draw.", "A decision maker faces an adaptive opponent, competitor, evader, or observer who can infer the next action from deterministic rules, habits, timing, visible signals, or leaked policy details, turning predictability into strategic disadvantage."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Observers can see enough historical behavior to infer patterns, but not enough protected entropy to know the next draw."}, {"display_text": "A stable, auditable probability policy can be maintained without undermining trust, due process, or mission coherence.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this deployment constraint: A stable, auditable probability policy can be maintained without undermining trust, due process, or mission coherence. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A stable, auditable probability policy can be maintained without undermining trust, due process, or mission coherence."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "A stable, auditable probability policy can be maintained without undermining trust, due process, or mission coherence."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 65, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-065", "ledger_sha256": "88a388b14afc2c1203840c289b66e7c3d00768892188a64a55989045fa3c59a3"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Stratified Treatment", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:stratified_treatment", "slug": "stratified_treatment"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 1, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 3 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is heterogeneous need under a uniform rule. The system is trying to govern, support, protect, inspect, educate, or serve cases as though they were interchangeable, but they differ in ways that change the appropriate treatment.\n\nThis creates a recurring mismatch. Some cases receive too much burden or intensity. Others receive too little support or protection. Operators begin creating informal exceptions because the official rule is too blunt. Meanwhile, averages hide which strata are succeeding and which are failing.\n\nThe deeper tension is between accountability and fit. A system needs rules stable enough to be explainable, but it also needs enough differentiation to avoid treating unlike cases as if they were the same.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A uniform intervention is misfit because relevant groups, layers, risk classes, capacities, or conditions differ systematically, yet the system is treating them as if they were interchangeable."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Stratification can partition a homogeneous population by an irrelevant variable.", "slug": "stratification"}], "residual_id": "r:stratified_treatment:b065_a05_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b065_a05_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Systematic heterogeneity. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Systematic heterogeneity"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Stratification can partition a homogeneous population by an irrelevant variable.", "slug": "stratification"}], "normalized_requirement": "Systematic heterogeneity", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Systematic heterogeneity", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P101-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a common treatment applied across cases or groups.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Different cases or groups receive uniform treatment.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail that the uniform treatment causes a mismatch for some recipients or conditions.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Uniform treatment creates misfit.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve predictability of the misfit rather than a merely possible accidental mismatch.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The resulting misfit is predictable.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "Uniform treatment creates predictable misfit.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "uniform treatment creates predictable misfit", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P101-C13-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Training-serving skew is one misfit source and need not involve uniform treatment.", "slug": "training_serving_skew"}], "residual_id": "r:stratified_treatment:b065_a05_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b065_a05_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use Stratified Treatment when uniform treatment predictably misfits the field. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Uniform treatment creates predictable misfit.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Uniform treatment creates predictable misfit", "Use Stratified Treatment when uniform treatment predictably misfits the field."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Without uniform application the contraindication can simply be avoided; with the guarded application domain, the named contraindicated case necessarily suffers the predictable misfit.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Contraindication", "one_liner": "Flag the sparse patient conditions under which a normally-indicated treatment becomes inadvisable, by naming the specific context in which its risk-benefit balance flips sign.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:contraindication", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1", "O2"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "uniform_treatment_includes_contraindicated_cases", "predicate": "The treatment is applied uniformly across cases including the named contraindicated context.", "rationale": "The exact record and emitted expression necessarily satisfy one complete DNF branch; any qualifier is atomic, anchored, and non-laundering."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "contraindication"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "uniform_treatment_includes_contraindicated_cases"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "contraindication", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P101-C13-U1", "why_it_fits": "One anchored application-domain fact completes the uniform-treatment relation without inventing another mechanism."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "If node heterogeneity did not create predictable errors under uniform treatment, the exact homogeneous-network fallacy would be absent.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Fallacy of Homogeneous Networks", "one_liner": "The implicit assumption that all nodes, links, OSes, versions, and configs across a distributed deployment are uniform — a missing degree of freedom in the system's model of its substrate that stays latent until deployment crosses a boundary where the uniformity breaks.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:fallacy_of_homogeneous_networks", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "fallacy_of_homogeneous_networks"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "fallacy_of_homogeneous_networks", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P101-C13-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every complete instance directly entails uniform treatment and predictable heterogeneous-case misfit."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "An unidentified idiosyncratic responder remains unpredictable and fails the guard; once the exact responder factor is identified, the standard exposure predictably misfits that subgroup.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Idiosyncratic Reaction", "one_liner": "Classify a rare drug harm as a distinct causal category — dose-independent, qualitatively different in kind, and confined to a small biologically-defined susceptible tail — so it is understood not as too-much-drug but as uniform exposure meeting a heterogeneous responder population.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:idiosyncratic_reaction", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O3"], "guard_type": "DOMAIN_RESTRICTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "responder_susceptibility_factor_is_identified", "predicate": "The treated population's responder-defining susceptibility factor is identified.", "rationale": "The exact record and emitted expression necessarily satisfy one complete DNF branch; any qualifier is atomic, anchored, and non-laundering."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "idiosyncratic_reaction"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "responder_susceptibility_factor_is_identified"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "idiosyncratic_reaction", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P101-C13-U1", "why_it_fits": "The single epistemic guard closes only the predictability gap and is anchored in the candidate's stated testable responder factor."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "If the uniform objective did not predictably suppress minority performance, the exact imbalance pathology and its corrective reweighting would disappear.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Class Imbalance", "one_liner": "Diagnose why a 99%-accurate classifier can be useless: when one class vastly outnumbers the class of interest, additive loss aggregation lets majority examples dominate the gradient, so the model learns to ignore the rare minority.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:class_imbalance", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "class_imbalance"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "class_imbalance", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P101-C13-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record directly entails heterogeneous classes, uniform treatment, and predictable misfit."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "If the same disclosure schedule fit every expertise and task context, the exact too-early/too-late progressive-disclosure failure would not occur.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Progressive-Disclosure Failure", "one_liner": "Diagnose an interface's usability breakdowns as a single mistuning between its staging schedule and the readiness of the users and tasks it actually meets, read off by whether too much is hidden or too much exposed.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:progressive_disclosure_failure", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "progressive_disclosure_failure"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "progressive_disclosure_failure", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P101-C13-U1", "why_it_fits": "The candidate directly instantiates uniform treatment producing predictable heterogeneous-case misfit."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Uniform treatment creates predictable misfit", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P101-C14", "dnf": [], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [], "predicate": "A relevant difference can be classified.", "resolution": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RESIDUAL", "semantic_scope": "NON_ABSTRACTION", "structural_head": "relevant difference is classifiable", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P101-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A crossover interaction can be estimated continuously without a stable class boundary.", "slug": "crossover_interaction"}], "residual_id": "r:stratified_treatment:b065_a05_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b065_a05_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A relevant difference can be classified. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A relevant difference can be classified"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RECLASSIFIED", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 1, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A crossover interaction can be estimated continuously without a stable class boundary.", "slug": "crossover_interaction"}], "normalized_requirement": "A relevant difference can be classified", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RECLASSIFIED", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later candidate-blind atomization classified this remainder as a threshold, parameter, materiality test, or other non-abstraction rather than a catalog gap."}, "predicate": "A relevant difference can be classified", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Treatment capacity or burden is consequential.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Treatment capacity or burden is consequential. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Treatment capacity or burden is consequential"]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Treatment capacity or burden is consequential"}, {"display_text": "Fairness requires fit rather than sameness.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this deployment constraint: Fairness requires fit rather than sameness. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Fairness requires fit rather than sameness"]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Fairness requires fit rather than sameness"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 65, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-065", "ledger_sha256": "88a388b14afc2c1203840c289b66e7c3d00768892188a64a55989045fa3c59a3"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Stratigraphic Time-Ordering Inference", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:stratigraphic_time_ordering_inference", "slug": "stratigraphic_time_ordering_inference"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 5, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system contains accumulated layers, traces, versions, deposits, or records, but the events that produced them are no longer directly observable. The interpreter needs a defensible chronology and causal history without confusing layer order with complete, undisturbed, or self-explanatory evidence.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system contains accumulated layers, traces, versions, deposits, or records, but the events that produced them are no longer directly observable. The interpreter needs a defensible chronology and causal history without confusing layer order with complete, undisturbed, or self-explanatory evidence."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Geometric chronology infers temporal order from layers, versions, deposits, or stacked traces.", "role_mapping": "Layers -> strata; order -> chronology.", "slug": "geometric_chronology", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b065_a06_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system contains accumulated layers, traces, versions, deposits, or records, but the events that produced them are no longer directly observable. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Evidence is arranged in layers, strata, versions, ordered deposits, stacked records, or sequential traces.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Evidence is arranged in layers, strata, versions, ordered deposits, stacked records, or sequential traces.", "A system contains accumulated layers, traces, versions, deposits, or records, but the events that produced them are no longer directly observable."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Geometric Chronology", "one_liner": "Read temporal order from the spatial or geometric structure a sequence of events leaves in a preserving medium.", "page_ref": "prime:geometric_chronology", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Layers -> strata; order -> chronology.", "slug": "geometric_chronology", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Geometric chronology infers temporal order from layers, versions, deposits, or stacked traces."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Evidence is arranged in layers, strata, versions, ordered deposits, stacked records, or sequential traces.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The purpose of geometric chronology is reconstructing historical sequence for explanation or dating.", "role_mapping": "Sequence -> relative chronology.", "slug": "geometric_chronology", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b065_a06_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The historical sequence matters for explanation, accountability, diagnosis, dating, reconstruction, or future action. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The historical sequence matters for explanation, accountability, diagnosis, dating, reconstruction, or future action."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Geometric Chronology", "one_liner": "Read temporal order from the spatial or geometric structure a sequence of events leaves in a preserving medium.", "page_ref": "prime:geometric_chronology", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Sequence -> relative chronology.", "slug": "geometric_chronology", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The purpose of geometric chronology is reconstructing historical sequence for explanation or dating."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The historical sequence matters for explanation, accountability, diagnosis, dating, reconstruction, or future action.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Layer order is used because the original formation sequence cannot be directly observed.", "role_mapping": "Original process -> past event; layers -> surviving evidence.", "slug": "geometric_chronology", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b065_a06_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Direct observation of the original process is unavailable, incomplete, expensive, or impossible. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Direct observation of the original process is unavailable, incomplete, expensive, or impossible."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Geometric Chronology", "one_liner": "Read temporal order from the spatial or geometric structure a sequence of events leaves in a preserving medium.", "page_ref": "prime:geometric_chronology", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Original process -> past event; layers -> surviving evidence.", "slug": "geometric_chronology", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Layer order is used because the original formation sequence cannot be directly observed."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Direct observation of the original process is unavailable, incomplete, expensive, or impossible.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The inference assumes positional order while checking disturbance, erosion, mixing, and missing intervals.", "role_mapping": "Position -> relative age; disturbance -> order exception.", "slug": "geometric_chronology", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b065_a06_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Layered evidence preserves history by keeping traces in order, but that same history is partial, selectively preserved, and vulnerable to disturbance. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Layer position plausibly encodes order, but disturbance, missing intervals, mixing, editing, erosion, or reworking may have occurred.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Layer position plausibly encodes order, but disturbance, missing intervals, mixing, editing, erosion, or reworking may have occurred.", "Layered evidence preserves history by keeping traces in order, but that same history is partial, selectively preserved, and vulnerable to disturbance."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Geometric Chronology", "one_liner": "Read temporal order from the spatial or geometric structure a sequence of events leaves in a preserving medium.", "page_ref": "prime:geometric_chronology", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Position -> relative age; disturbance -> order exception.", "slug": "geometric_chronology", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The inference assumes positional order while checking disturbance, erosion, mixing, and missing intervals."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Layer position plausibly encodes order, but disturbance, missing intervals, mixing, editing, erosion, or reworking may have occurred.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Sequences from different sites or records must be correlated to form a common chronology.", "role_mapping": "Layer sequences -> local columns; common chronology -> correlation.", "slug": "geometric_chronology", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b065_a06_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The interpreter needs a defensible chronology and causal history without confusing layer order with complete, undisturbed, or self-explanatory evidence. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Multiple layer sequences, sites, repositories, or logs need to be correlated into a common chronology.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Multiple layer sequences, sites, repositories, or logs need to be correlated into a common chronology.", "The interpreter needs a defensible chronology and causal history without confusing layer order with complete, undisturbed, or self-explanatory evidence."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Geometric Chronology", "one_liner": "Read temporal order from the spatial or geometric structure a sequence of events leaves in a preserving medium.", "page_ref": "prime:geometric_chronology", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Layer sequences -> local columns; common chronology -> correlation.", "slug": "geometric_chronology", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Sequences from different sites or records must be correlated to form a common chronology."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Multiple layer sequences, sites, repositories, or logs need to be correlated into a common chronology.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Causal interpretation depends on distinguishing earlier conditions, transition events, later overlays, and later reinterpretations.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Causal interpretation depends on distinguishing earlier conditions, transition events, later overlays, and later reinterpretations. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Causal interpretation depends on distinguishing earlier conditions, transition events, later overlays, and later reinterpretations."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Causal interpretation depends on distinguishing earlier conditions, transition events, later overlays, and later reinterpretations."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 65, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-065", "ledger_sha256": "88a388b14afc2c1203840c289b66e7c3d00768892188a64a55989045fa3c59a3"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Stress Accumulation Monitoring", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:stress_accumulation_monitoring", "slug": "stress_accumulation_monitoring"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is latent accumulation. Stress enters the system repeatedly or compounds over time, but the damage is stored rather than immediately visible. Average metrics may look acceptable while one role, interface, joint, relationship, queue, asset, or obligation moves closer to rupture.\n\nThis creates a mismatch between appearance and risk. The system may reward continued operation because the output still looks normal, while recovery time, maintenance reserves, trust, slack, and physical tolerance are being consumed. By the time visible damage appears, the intervention window may have narrowed.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system absorbs stress over time until it may suddenly fracture, burn out, snap, revolt, default, or collapse."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Stress rupture requires recurrent or compounding load to exceed dissipation and accumulate.", "role_mapping": "Stress inputs -> load; dissipation -> recovery.", "slug": "stress_rupture", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b065_a07_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Stress enters the system repeatedly or compounds over time, but the damage is stored rather than immediately visible. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Stress inputs recur or compound faster than the system naturally dissipates them.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Stress inputs recur or compound faster than the system naturally dissipates them.", "Stress enters the system repeatedly or compounds over time, but the damage is stored rather than immediately visible."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Stress and Rupture", "one_liner": "Accumulated tension leads to break.", "page_ref": "prime:stress_rupture", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Stress inputs -> load; dissipation -> recovery.", "slug": "stress_rupture", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Stress rupture requires recurrent or compounding load to exceed dissipation and accumulate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Stress inputs recur or compound faster than the system naturally dissipates them.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Rupture occurs where stress concentrates at weak points rather than at the average load.", "role_mapping": "Weak point -> stress concentrator.", "slug": "stress_rupture", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b065_a07_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when stress builds gradually, is not fully visible in current performance, and can suddenly rupture a weak point. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The system has weak points where stress concentrates unevenly, even when average load appears acceptable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The system has weak points where stress concentrates unevenly, even when average load appears acceptable.", "Use this archetype when stress builds gradually, is not fully visible in current performance, and can suddenly rupture a weak point."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Stress and Rupture", "one_liner": "Accumulated tension leads to break.", "page_ref": "prime:stress_rupture", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Weak point -> stress concentrator.", "slug": "stress_rupture", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Rupture occurs where stress concentrates at weak points rather than at the average load."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The system has weak points where stress concentrates unevenly, even when average load appears acceptable.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Damage can accumulate invisibly while the structure still performs before failure.", "role_mapping": "Visible performance -> pre-rupture state; hidden damage -> accumulated stress.", "slug": "stress_rupture", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b065_a07_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "By the time visible damage appears, the intervention window may have narrowed. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Visible performance can remain tolerable while hidden fatigue, resentment, debt, pressure, or damage accumulates.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Visible performance can remain tolerable while hidden fatigue, resentment, debt, pressure, or damage accumulates.", "By the time visible damage appears, the intervention window may have narrowed."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Stress and Rupture", "one_liner": "Accumulated tension leads to break.", "page_ref": "prime:stress_rupture", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Visible performance -> pre-rupture state; hidden damage -> accumulated stress.", "slug": "stress_rupture", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Damage can accumulate invisibly while the structure still performs before failure."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Visible performance can remain tolerable while hidden fatigue, resentment, debt, pressure, or damage accumulates.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A rupture is a discontinuous costly failure compared with preventive relief.", "role_mapping": "Post-rupture recovery -> failure consequence.", "slug": "stress_rupture", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b065_a07_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Post-rupture recovery would be costly, dangerous, politically damaging, or hard to reverse. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Post-rupture recovery would be costly, dangerous, politically damaging, or hard to reverse."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Stress and Rupture", "one_liner": "Accumulated tension leads to break.", "page_ref": "prime:stress_rupture", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Post-rupture recovery -> failure consequence.", "slug": "stress_rupture", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A rupture is a discontinuous costly failure compared with preventive relief."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Post-rupture recovery would be costly, dangerous, politically damaging, or hard to reverse.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "There is enough observability to measure, estimate, or triangulate stress trends before rupture.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when stress builds gradually, is not fully visible in current performance, and can suddenly rupture a weak point. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: There is enough observability to measure, estimate, or triangulate stress trends before rupture. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["There is enough observability to measure, estimate, or triangulate stress trends before rupture.", "Use this archetype when stress builds gradually, is not fully visible in current performance, and can suddenly rupture a weak point."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "There is enough observability to measure, estimate, or triangulate stress trends before rupture."}, {"display_text": "Relief, reinforcement, recovery, redesign, or escalation remains possible if warning appears early enough.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is appropriate when early relief, reinforcement, rest, repair, mediation, restructuring, or escalation is still possible. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: Relief, reinforcement, recovery, redesign, or escalation remains possible if warning appears early enough. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Relief, reinforcement, recovery, redesign, or escalation remains possible if warning appears early enough.", "It is appropriate when early relief, reinforcement, rest, repair, mediation, restructuring, or escalation is still possible."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Relief, reinforcement, recovery, redesign, or escalation remains possible if warning appears early enough."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 65, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-065", "ledger_sha256": "88a388b14afc2c1203840c289b66e7c3d00768892188a64a55989045fa3c59a3"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Structural Constraint Identification and Lock-In", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:structural_constraint_identification_and_lock_in", "slug": "structural_constraint_identification_and_lock_in"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system, institution, technology, organization, or historical process appears to be following a constrained trajectory, but the explanation oscillates between fatalism (“it had to happen”) and voluntarism (“actors could simply choose otherwise”). The actual binding constraints and lock-in mechanisms are under-specified, making both causal explanation and intervention planning unreliable.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system, institution, technology, organization, or historical process appears to be following a constrained trajectory, but the explanation oscillates between fatalism (“it had to happen”) and voluntarism (“actors could simply choose otherwise”). The actual binding constraints and lock-in mechanisms are under-specified, making both causal explanation and intervention planning unreliable."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Lock-in is exactly an outcome experienced as structurally difficult to escape.", "role_mapping": "Locked outcome -> path-dependent state.", "slug": "lock_in", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b065_a08_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A historical or organizational outcome is described as inevitable, structurally determined, or locked in. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A historical or organizational outcome is described as inevitable, structurally determined, or locked in."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Lock-In", "one_liner": "Forward-looking cost of switching exceeds the forward-looking cost of staying, even when a superior alternative exists.", "page_ref": "prime:lock_in", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Locked outcome -> path-dependent state.", "slug": "lock_in", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Lock-in is exactly an outcome experienced as structurally difficult to escape."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A historical or organizational outcome is described as inevitable, structurally determined, or locked in.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Lock-in necessarily carries forward the effects of early standards, infrastructure, or choices.", "role_mapping": "Early choice -> path dependence; later options -> constrained set.", "slug": "lock_in", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b065_a08_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Early choices, founding conditions, standards, infrastructure, or resource endowments continue shaping later options. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Early choices, founding conditions, standards, infrastructure, or resource endowments continue shaping later options."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Lock-In", "one_liner": "Forward-looking cost of switching exceeds the forward-looking cost of staying, even when a superior alternative exists.", "page_ref": "prime:lock_in", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Early choice -> path dependence; later options -> constrained set.", "slug": "lock_in", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Lock-in necessarily carries forward the effects of early standards, infrastructure, or choices."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Early choices, founding conditions, standards, infrastructure, or resource endowments continue shaping later options.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Persistent failure to redirect despite new evidence and visible costs is a defining lock-in symptom.", "role_mapping": "Stated intention -> desired exit; repeated direction -> locked path.", "slug": "lock_in", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b065_a08_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The same actors repeatedly fail to change direction despite stated intention, new evidence, or visible costs. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The same actors repeatedly fail to change direction despite stated intention, new evidence, or visible costs."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Lock-In", "one_liner": "Forward-looking cost of switching exceeds the forward-looking cost of staying, even when a superior alternative exists.", "page_ref": "prime:lock_in", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Stated intention -> desired exit; repeated direction -> locked path.", "slug": "lock_in", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Persistent failure to redirect despite new evidence and visible costs is a defining lock-in symptom."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The same actors repeatedly fail to change direction despite stated intention, new evidence, or visible costs.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "High technical, economic, or political switching cost makes an institution or platform hard to reverse.", "role_mapping": "Reversal cost -> lock-in mechanism.", "slug": "lock_in", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b065_a08_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system, institution, technology, organization, or historical process appears to be following a constrained trajectory, but the explanation oscillates between fatalism (“it had to happen”) and voluntarism (“actors could simply choose otherwise”). The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A policy, platform, technology, or institution has become expensive, risky, or politically difficult to reverse.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A policy, platform, technology, or institution has become expensive, risky, or politically difficult to reverse.", "A system, institution, technology, organization, or historical process appears to be following a constrained trajectory, but the explanation oscillates between fatalism (“it had to happen”) and voluntarism (“actors could simply choose otherwise”)."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Lock-In", "one_liner": "Forward-looking cost of switching exceeds the forward-looking cost of staying, even when a superior alternative exists.", "page_ref": "prime:lock_in", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Reversal cost -> lock-in mechanism.", "slug": "lock_in", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "High technical, economic, or political switching cost makes an institution or platform hard to reverse."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A policy, platform, technology, or institution has become expensive, risky, or politically difficult to reverse.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Competing explanations disagree over whether agency or structure matters more.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Structural explanations are necessary because real constraints shape what can happen, but structural explanations become misleading when they turn probability into inevitability, hide counterfactual breakpoints, or deny the residual agency of actors operating inside constraints. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Competing explanations disagree over whether agency or structure matters more. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Competing explanations disagree over whether agency or structure matters more.", "Structural explanations are necessary because real constraints shape what can happen, but structural explanations become misleading when they turn probability into inevitability, hide counterfactual breakpoints, or deny the residual agency of actors operating inside constraints."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Competing explanations disagree over whether agency or structure matters more."}, {"display_text": "Forecasting or scenario planning needs to know which futures are structurally plausible rather than merely imaginable.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: Forecasting or scenario planning needs to know which futures are structurally plausible rather than merely imaginable. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Forecasting or scenario planning needs to know which futures are structurally plausible rather than merely imaginable."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Forecasting or scenario planning needs to know which futures are structurally plausible rather than merely imaginable."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 65, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-065", "ledger_sha256": "88a388b14afc2c1203840c289b66e7c3d00768892188a64a55989045fa3c59a3"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Structural Filter Intersection Audit", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:structural_filter_intersection_audit", "slug": "structural_filter_intersection_audit"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 6, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 6, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "6 of 7 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 7}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A content-producing or decision-producing system applies multiple parallel filters before output becomes visible, authorized, funded, ranked, or treated as legitimate. Each filter may be locally reasonable, and producers may be sincere or unaware, yet the intersection of filters systematically removes, softens, delays, or reframes certain outputs. Audiences then mistake the surviving surface for reality, consensus, demand, quality, or independent judgment.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A content-producing or decision-producing system applies multiple parallel filters before output becomes visible, authorized, funded, ranked, or treated as legitimate. Each filter may be locally reasonable, and producers may be sincere or unaware, yet the intersection of filters systematically removes, softens, delays, or reframes certain outputs. Audiences then mistake the surviving surface for reality, consensus, demand, quality, or independent judgment."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Structural filtering requires multiple institutional or role-based filters able to veto, reshape, or suppress output.", "role_mapping": "Institutions or roles -> filters; output -> candidates.", "slug": "structural_filtering", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b065_a09_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A single gate is not enough; the pattern matters when multiple filters combine. In this condition set, the requirement is: Several independent institutions, roles, or rules can veto, delay, reshape, downrank, or defund output.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Several independent institutions, roles, or rules can veto, delay, reshape, downrank, or defund output."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Structural Filtering", "one_liner": "A content-producing system passes its output through several parallel institutional filters, so the surviving output is the filter set's intersection — predictable even when producers are sincere and unaware.", "page_ref": "prime:structural_filtering", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Institutions or roles -> filters; output -> candidates.", "slug": "structural_filtering", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Structural filtering requires multiple institutional or role-based filters able to veto, reshape, or suppress output."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Several independent institutions, roles, or rules can veto, delay, reshape, downrank, or defund output.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The visible survivor set is necessarily smaller than the pre-filter candidate universe.", "role_mapping": "Candidate universe -> inputs; survivors -> filtered output.", "slug": "structural_filtering", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b065_a09_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "There must be plausible non-surviving alternatives, not merely poor production. In this condition set, the requirement is: The candidate output universe is larger than the visible survivor set.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The candidate output universe is larger than the visible survivor set."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Structural Filtering", "one_liner": "A content-producing system passes its output through several parallel institutional filters, so the surviving output is the filter set's intersection — predictable even when producers are sincere and unaware.", "page_ref": "prime:structural_filtering", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Candidate universe -> inputs; survivors -> filtered output.", "slug": "structural_filtering", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The visible survivor set is necessarily smaller than the pre-filter candidate universe."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The candidate output universe is larger than the visible survivor set.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Structural filters often operate through implicit routines and incentives rather than only explicit criteria.", "role_mapping": "Implicit incentives -> filter rules.", "slug": "structural_filtering", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b065_a09_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The system works even when no one states the full selection rule. In this condition set, the requirement is: Filter criteria are partly implicit, incentive-driven, or routinized.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Filter criteria are partly implicit, incentive-driven, or routinized."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Structural Filtering", "one_liner": "A content-producing system passes its output through several parallel institutional filters, so the surviving output is the filter set's intersection — predictable even when producers are sincere and unaware.", "page_ref": "prime:structural_filtering", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Implicit incentives -> filter rules.", "slug": "structural_filtering", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Structural filters often operate through implicit routines and incentives rather than only explicit criteria."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Filter criteria are partly implicit, incentive-driven, or routinized.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Expected filters induce anticipatory self-selection before formal review.", "role_mapping": "Producer adaptation -> prefiltering; formal review -> downstream filter.", "slug": "structural_filtering", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b065_a09_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Self-editing, source selection, topic choice, and scope narrowing can happen upstream. In this condition set, the requirement is: Producers adapt to expected filters before formal review occurs.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Producers adapt to expected filters before formal review occurs."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Structural Filtering", "one_liner": "A content-producing system passes its output through several parallel institutional filters, so the surviving output is the filter set's intersection — predictable even when producers are sincere and unaware.", "page_ref": "prime:structural_filtering", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Producer adaptation -> prefiltering; formal review -> downstream filter.", "slug": "structural_filtering", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Expected filters induce anticipatory self-selection before formal review."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Producers adapt to expected filters before formal review occurs.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Recipients see surviving output while rejected and never-attempted alternatives remain invisible.", "role_mapping": "Recipients -> output observers; suppressed items -> hidden set.", "slug": "structural_filtering", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b065_a09_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This makes the intersection look like natural consensus or objective reality. In this condition set, the requirement is: Recipients observe surviving output but not discarded, softened, or never-attempted output.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Recipients observe surviving output but not discarded, softened, or never-attempted output."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Structural Filtering", "one_liner": "A content-producing system passes its output through several parallel institutional filters, so the surviving output is the filter set's intersection — predictable even when producers are sincere and unaware.", "page_ref": "prime:structural_filtering", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Recipients -> output observers; suppressed items -> hidden set.", "slug": "structural_filtering", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Recipients see surviving output while rejected and never-attempted alternatives remain invisible."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Recipients observe surviving output but not discarded, softened, or never-attempted output.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Nominally distinct filters can share institutional incentives or information, making exclusions correlated.", "role_mapping": "Filters -> stages; shared source -> dependence.", "slug": "structural_filtering", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b065_a09_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Apparent plurality may still yield one narrow intersection. In this condition set, the requirement is: Nominally distinct filters share incentives or information sources.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Nominally distinct filters share incentives or information sources."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Structural Filtering", "one_liner": "A content-producing system passes its output through several parallel institutional filters, so the surviving output is the filter set's intersection — predictable even when producers are sincere and unaware.", "page_ref": "prime:structural_filtering", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Filters -> stages; shared source -> dependence.", "slug": "structural_filtering", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Nominally distinct filters can share institutional incentives or information, making exclusions correlated."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Nominally distinct filters share incentives or information sources.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Structural filters can all be legitimate or all illegitimate.", "slug": "structural_filtering"}], "residual_id": "r:structural_filter_intersection_audit:b065_a09_c7", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b065_a09_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Repair requires separation, not blanket anti-filter rhetoric. In this condition set, the requirement is: Legitimate quality filters and illegitimate viewpoint or status filters are mixed together.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Legitimate quality filters and illegitimate viewpoint or status filters are mixed together."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Structural filters can all be legitimate or all illegitimate.", "slug": "structural_filtering"}], "normalized_requirement": "Legitimate quality filters and illegitimate viewpoint or status filters are mixed together.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Legitimate quality filters and illegitimate viewpoint or status filters are mixed together.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 65, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-065", "ledger_sha256": "88a388b14afc2c1203840c289b66e7c3d00768892188a64a55989045fa3c59a3"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Structural Harm Mapping", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:structural_harm_mapping", "slug": "structural_harm_mapping"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is distributed causation without actionable visibility. Each local rule, metric, workflow, form, or constraint may appear reasonable when inspected alone. Together, however, they can produce predictable harm or blocked opportunity. Because no single part looks solely responsible, the burden is often interpreted as personal failure, lack of effort, isolated error, cultural deficiency, or unavoidable complexity.\n\nStructural Harm Mapping changes the unit of analysis. It asks how the arrangement produces the pattern: which route people must travel, which gates they must pass, which resources they lack, which incentives shape decisions, which constraints limit helpers, and which authority owners could alter the pathway.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "People experience harm, risk, blocked opportunity, or unmet needs, but the cause is spread across rules, resource flows, institutional constraints, design defaults, and accountability gaps rather than one direct perpetrator. Because the pathway is not visible, the system treats the harm as isolated incidents, personal failure, cultural deficiency, or unavoidable complexity."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Structural violence necessarily produces recurring patterned harm across people, sites, or time rather than a single isolated act.", "role_mapping": "Recurring harm -> structural effect.", "slug": "structural_violence", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b065_a10_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when harm repeats across cases and ordinary explanations are too local. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The same harm or exclusion recurs across cases, sites, services, or time periods.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The same harm or exclusion recurs across cases, sites, services, or time periods.", "Use this archetype when harm repeats across cases and ordinary explanations are too local."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Structural Violence", "one_liner": "Systemic harm.", "page_ref": "prime:structural_violence", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Recurring harm -> structural effect.", "slug": "structural_violence", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Structural violence necessarily produces recurring patterned harm across people, sites, or time rather than a single isolated act."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The same harm or exclusion recurs across cases, sites, services, or time periods.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P101-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the harm, the proximate actors, and their potential repair role.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Actors are closest to an experienced harm and could participate in fixing it.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the say or report modality and must not convert the report into verified actuality.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The actors report the lack rather than the source asserting it independently as fact.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must connect the missing capacity to repair of the same harm.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The reported missing enablement is needed to fix the harm.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by a reported lack of authority.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The actors report lacking authority to fix the harm.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by a reported lack of resources.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The actors report lacking resources to fix the harm.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by a reported lack of permission.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The actors report lacking permission to fix the harm.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Actors closest to a harm report lacking an enablement needed to fix it.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "harm-proximate actors report lacking means to repair harm", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P101-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Structural harm can affect actors who do possess authority to change it.", "slug": "structural_violence"}], "residual_id": "r:structural_harm_mapping:b065_a10_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b065_a10_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It asks how the arrangement produces the pattern: which route people must travel, which gates they must pass, which resources they lack, which incentives shape decisions, which constraints limit helpers, and which authority owners could alter the pathway. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Actors closest to the harm say they lack authority, resources, or permission to fix it.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Actors closest to the harm say they lack authority, resources, or permission to fix it.", "It asks how the arrangement produces the pattern: which route people must travel, which gates they must pass, which resources they lack, which incentives shape decisions, which constraints limit helpers, and which authority owners could alter the pathway."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Structural harm can affect actors who do possess authority to change it.", "slug": "structural_violence"}], "normalized_requirement": "Actors closest to the harm say they lack authority, resources, or permission to fix it.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Actors closest to the harm say they lack authority, resources, or permission to fix it.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Formal and informal structures can align without access barriers.", "slug": "formal_vs_informal_structures"}], "residual_id": "r:structural_harm_mapping:b065_a10_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b065_a10_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It fits when formal access exists but practical access is blocked, when frontline workers rely on hidden workarounds, when responsibility is passed between units, or when outcome differences persist after direct incidents have been addressed. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Formal access exists, but practical access is blocked by cost, documentation, timing, transport, language, digital requirements, eligibility, or trust.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Formal access exists, but practical access is blocked by cost, documentation, timing, transport, language, digital requirements, eligibility, or trust.", "It fits when formal access exists but practical access is blocked, when frontline workers rely on hidden workarounds, when responsibility is passed between units, or when outcome differences persist after direct incidents have been addressed."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Formal and informal structures can align without access barriers.", "slug": "formal_vs_informal_structures"}], "normalized_requirement": "Formal access exists, but practical access is blocked by cost, documentation, timing, transport, language, digital requirements, eligibility, or trust.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Formal access exists, but practical access is blocked by cost, documentation, timing, transport, language, digital requirements, eligibility, or trust.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Structural violence persists through institutional arrangements after individual incidents or actors are addressed.", "role_mapping": "Persistent difference -> structural outcome; isolated conduct -> individual cause.", "slug": "structural_violence", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b065_a10_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It fits when formal access exists but practical access is blocked, when frontline workers rely on hidden workarounds, when responsibility is passed between units, or when outcome differences persist after direct incidents have been addressed. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Outcome differences persist after direct conduct or isolated incidents are addressed.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Outcome differences persist after direct conduct or isolated incidents are addressed.", "It fits when formal access exists but practical access is blocked, when frontline workers rely on hidden workarounds, when responsibility is passed between units, or when outcome differences persist after direct incidents have been addressed."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Structural Violence", "one_liner": "Systemic harm.", "page_ref": "prime:structural_violence", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Persistent difference -> structural outcome; isolated conduct -> individual cause.", "slug": "structural_violence", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Structural violence persists through institutional arrangements after individual incidents or actors are addressed."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Outcome differences persist after direct conduct or isolated incidents are addressed.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P102-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve an affected participant role and a burden borne by that role.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An affected or harmed group experiences or bears one or more burdens.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail identification by the affected group rather than discovery only by an external analyst.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The affected participants identify the burdens.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve official representational omission rather than a burden already visible in the formal map.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The identified burdens are absent from or invisible in official process maps.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Affected participants identify burdens that official process maps do not represent.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "affected participants identify burdens absent from official process maps", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P102-C01-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Structural violence can be fully documented in official analysis.", "slug": "structural_violence"}], "residual_id": "r:structural_harm_mapping:b065_a10_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b065_a10_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when people closest to the harm describe burdens that official process maps omit: waiting, paperwork, fear of retaliation, travel, digital friction, trust loss, informal knowledge, repeated proof requirements, or the cumulative cost of navigating disconnected systems. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The harmed group or affected participants identify burdens that are invisible in official process maps.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The harmed group or affected participants identify burdens that are invisible in official process maps.", "It is especially useful when people closest to the harm describe burdens that official process maps omit: waiting, paperwork, fear of retaliation, travel, digital friction, trust loss, informal knowledge, repeated proof requirements, or the cumulative cost of navigating disconnected systems."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Structural violence can be fully documented in official analysis.", "slug": "structural_violence"}], "normalized_requirement": "The harmed group or affected participants identify burdens that are invisible in official process maps.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The harmed group or affected participants identify burdens that are invisible in official process maps.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Existing remedies focus on training, messaging, or awareness even though the map suggests resource, rule, or design causes.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "People experience harm, risk, blocked opportunity, or unmet needs, but the cause is spread across rules, resource flows, institutional constraints, design defaults, and accountability gaps rather than one direct perpetrator. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Existing remedies focus on training, messaging, or awareness even though the map suggests resource, rule, or design causes. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Existing remedies focus on training, messaging, or awareness even though the map suggests resource, rule, or design causes.", "People experience harm, risk, blocked opportunity, or unmet needs, but the cause is spread across rules, resource flows, institutional constraints, design defaults, and accountability gaps rather than one direct perpetrator."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Existing remedies focus on training, messaging, or awareness even though the map suggests resource, rule, or design causes."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 65, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-065", "ledger_sha256": "88a388b14afc2c1203840c289b66e7c3d00768892188a64a55989045fa3c59a3"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Structural Inversion Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:structural_inversion_design", "slug": "structural_inversion_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 5, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Most systems privilege a normal direction: inputs produce outputs, upstream pushes downstream, leaders direct recipients, premises support conclusions, causes precede observations, and an external surface encloses an interior. Familiarity makes this direction look intrinsic even when it is only one arrangement. The normal direction may hide dependency and control, suppress alternative interpretations, or make a difficult problem appear one-way.\n\nThe structural risk is that “inverse” is used for several non-equivalent operations. A mathematical inverse restores an input under composition. A reverse sequence changes order. A sign flip negates a value. A role reversal exchanges positions. A control inversion moves initiative to a different context holder. A chemical or material inversion may change handedness, orientation, phase, or internal configuration. A philosophical inversion may reverse an explanatory priority. These operations have different domain, information, invariant, and consequence requirements.\n\nThree failure pressures recur. First, information loss: the forward process merges, compresses, rounds, destroys, or forgets distinctions. Second, nonuniqueness: several sources produce the same output, so the inverse is set-valued or inference-based. Third, boundary pathology: zeros, singularities, discontinuities, fixed points, unsafe states, and domain transitions behave differently from ordinary cases. A fourth pressure, semantic drift, appears when a formally valid reversal changes the meaning, rights, or causal interpretation attached to the structure.\n\nWithout a governed contract, teams select convenient preimages, ignore failed round trips, overgeneralize a local symmetry, reverse authority without accountability, or deploy a transformation that is formally invertible but operationally irreversible. Structural Inversion Design makes these risks first-class design objects.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system is understood or operated only in its familiar direction. The normal direction may hide coupling, privilege one perspective, make reconstruction difficult, concentrate initiative, or embed an assumption that has never been tested. A proposed reversal is attractive, but it is unclear what exactly is reversed, whether a valid inverse exists, which information was discarded, what remains invariant, how boundary cases behave, and whether applying the reverse transformation restores the source. Ungoverned inversion creates semantic category errors, false symmetry, irreversible damage, oscillation, ambiguity, and misplaced confidence."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Inversion applies when a forward transformation is easy but its reverse is difficult to reason about or compute.", "role_mapping": "Forward transformation -> map; undo -> inverse.", "slug": "inversion", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b065_a11_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Typical signals include a forward process that is easy to run but difficult to undo; observed outputs whose plausible sources must be reconstructed; a role or control pattern whose normal direction creates coupling; a transformation whose symmetry claim needs testing; or a material or representational configuration whose flipped state may behave differently. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A forward transformation is easy to execute but hard to reason about or undo.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A forward transformation is easy to execute but hard to reason about or undo.", "Typical signals include a forward process that is easy to run but difficult to undo; observed outputs whose plausible sources must be reconstructed; a role or control pattern whose normal direction creates coupling; a transformation whose symmetry claim needs testing; or a material or representational configuration whose flipped state may behave differently."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Inversion", "one_liner": "Reversal of structures.", "page_ref": "prime:inversion", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Forward transformation -> map; undo -> inverse.", "slug": "inversion", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Inversion applies when a forward transformation is easy but its reverse is difficult to reason about or compute."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A forward transformation is easy to execute but hard to reason about or undo.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "An inverse problem starts from desired or observed outputs and reconstructs source inputs.", "role_mapping": "Known output -> image; reconstructed source -> preimage.", "slug": "inversion", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b065_a11_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Second, nonuniqueness: several sources produce the same output, so the inverse is set-valued or inference-based. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Desired outputs are known but the source structure or required inputs must be reconstructed.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Desired outputs are known but the source structure or required inputs must be reconstructed.", "Second, nonuniqueness: several sources produce the same output, so the inverse is set-valued or inference-based."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Inversion", "one_liner": "Reversal of structures.", "page_ref": "prime:inversion", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Known output -> image; reconstructed source -> preimage.", "slug": "inversion", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "An inverse problem starts from desired or observed outputs and reconstructs source inputs."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Desired outputs are known but the source structure or required inputs must be reconstructed.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Reversing orientation, sign, role, or mapping is a direct test of claimed symmetry.", "role_mapping": "Reversal -> inverse operation; response -> symmetry test.", "slug": "inversion", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b065_a11_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Typical signals include a forward process that is easy to run but difficult to undo; observed outputs whose plausible sources must be reconstructed; a role or control pattern whose normal direction creates coupling; a transformation whose symmetry claim needs testing; or a material or representational configuration whose flipped state may behave differently. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A claim of symmetry needs to be tested by reversing orientation, sign, role, or mapping.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A claim of symmetry needs to be tested by reversing orientation, sign, role, or mapping.", "Typical signals include a forward process that is easy to run but difficult to undo; observed outputs whose plausible sources must be reconstructed; a role or control pattern whose normal direction creates coupling; a transformation whose symmetry claim needs testing; or a material or representational configuration whose flipped state may behave differently."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Inversion", "one_liner": "Reversal of structures.", "page_ref": "prime:inversion", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Reversal -> inverse operation; response -> symmetry test.", "slug": "inversion", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Reversing orientation, sign, role, or mapping is a direct test of claimed symmetry."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A claim of symmetry needs to be tested by reversing orientation, sign, role, or mapping.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Rollback requires that the original state be recoverable through an inverse of the transformation.", "role_mapping": "Migrated state -> output; recovered state -> inverse image.", "slug": "inversion", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b065_a11_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Typical signals include a forward process that is easy to run but difficult to undo; observed outputs whose plausible sources must be reconstructed; a role or control pattern whose normal direction creates coupling; a transformation whose symmetry claim needs testing; or a material or representational configuration whose flipped state may behave differently. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A rollback or migration requires evidence that state can be recovered after transformation.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A rollback or migration requires evidence that state can be recovered after transformation.", "Typical signals include a forward process that is easy to run but difficult to undo; observed outputs whose plausible sources must be reconstructed; a role or control pattern whose normal direction creates coupling; a transformation whose symmetry claim needs testing; or a material or representational configuration whose flipped state may behave differently."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Inversion", "one_liner": "Reversal of structures.", "page_ref": "prime:inversion", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Migrated state -> output; recovered state -> inverse image.", "slug": "inversion", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Rollback requires that the original state be recoverable through an inverse of the transformation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A rollback or migration requires evidence that state can be recovered after transformation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Intentional physical or chemical flipping is an inversion whose resulting properties must be re-evaluated.", "role_mapping": "Configuration -> orientation; flipped form -> inverse.", "slug": "inversion", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b065_a11_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A chemical or material inversion may change handedness, orientation, phase, or internal configuration. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A material or chemical configuration is intentionally flipped and properties must be revalidated.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A material or chemical configuration is intentionally flipped and properties must be revalidated.", "A chemical or material inversion may change handedness, orientation, phase, or internal configuration."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Inversion", "one_liner": "Reversal of structures.", "page_ref": "prime:inversion", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Configuration -> orientation; flipped form -> inverse.", "slug": "inversion", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Intentional physical or chemical flipping is an inversion whose resulting properties must be re-evaluated."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A material or chemical configuration is intentionally flipped and properties must be revalidated.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A conventional role, direction, ordering, or inside/outside relation may be causing coupling or bias.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It supports chemistry and materials work when polarity, orientation, configuration, or inside/outside structure is inverted and properties require fresh validation. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: A conventional role, direction, ordering, or inside/outside relation may be causing coupling or bias. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A conventional role, direction, ordering, or inside/outside relation may be causing coupling or bias.", "It supports chemistry and materials work when polarity, orientation, configuration, or inside/outside structure is inverted and properties require fresh validation."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "A conventional role, direction, ordering, or inside/outside relation may be causing coupling or bias."}, {"display_text": "A narrative or explanation must be read backward to identify hidden premises or unreliable mediation.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It supports philosophy and critical analysis when a familiar explanatory hierarchy or narrative direction is reversed to expose hidden premises. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: A narrative or explanation must be read backward to identify hidden premises or unreliable mediation. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A narrative or explanation must be read backward to identify hidden premises or unreliable mediation.", "It supports philosophy and critical analysis when a familiar explanatory hierarchy or narrative direction is reversed to expose hidden premises."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "A narrative or explanation must be read backward to identify hidden premises or unreliable mediation."}, {"display_text": "A control-flow inversion is proposed but must be bounded by interface, authority, and fallback rules.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A control inversion moves initiative to a different context holder. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: A control-flow inversion is proposed but must be bounded by interface, authority, and fallback rules. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A control-flow inversion is proposed but must be bounded by interface, authority, and fallback rules.", "A control inversion moves initiative to a different context holder."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 8, "text": "A control-flow inversion is proposed but must be bounded by interface, authority, and fallback rules."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 65, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-065", "ledger_sha256": "88a388b14afc2c1203840c289b66e7c3d00768892188a64a55989045fa3c59a3"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Structural Mapping Transfer", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:structural_mapping_transfer", "slug": "structural_mapping_transfer"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 2 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 2}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Cross-domain reuse faces a double hazard. Without abstraction, teams miss transferable structures and repeatedly reinvent solutions. With uncontrolled abstraction, they equate objects that look alike while ignoring causal direction, authority, scale, semantics, and constraints. The result is either lost learning or negative transfer. A valid intervention must preserve source leverage, target independence, difference visibility, and the right to reject the analogy.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A source and target may share a transferable relational structure despite different surface forms, but a false analogy could import the wrong causal direction, roles, scale, or constraints."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "This branch preserves the complete remedy-free diagnostic route; goals, feasibility clauses, gates, deployment constraints, and supporting context remain outside the DNF."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Analogy necessarily maps relational structure from a source to a target while discarding surface attributes, directly entailing shared structure despite different surface objects or vocabulary.", "role_mapping": "The source and target domains map directly; preserved higher-order relations map to the shared relational structure.", "slug": "analogy", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "ext001_structural_mapping_transfer_a01", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored structural_problem, prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: A source and target may share relational structure despite different surface objects or vocabulary.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A source and target may share relational structure despite different surface objects or vocabulary."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Analogy", "one_liner": "Transfer structure between domains.", "page_ref": "prime:analogy", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "The source and target domains map directly; preserved higher-order relations map to the shared relational structure.", "slug": "analogy", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Analogy necessarily maps relational structure from a source to a target while discarding surface attributes, directly entailing shared structure despite different surface objects or vocabulary."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A source and target may share relational structure despite different surface objects or vocabulary.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "EXT001-C094", "dnf": [["EXT001-U094-O1"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"obligation_id": "EXT001-U094-O1", "predicate": "Differences in causal direction, authority, scale, semantics, or constraints could invalidate the transfer."}], "predicate": "Differences in causal direction, authority, scale, semantics, or constraints could invalidate the transfer.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "Differences in causal direction, authority, scale, semantics, or constraints could invalidate the transfer.", "unit_id": "EXT001-U094"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"catalog_exhaustion": "CONDITION_LEVEL", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Differences in causal direction, authority, scale, semantics, or constraints could invalidate the transfer.", "slug": "intervention_induced_model_invalidation"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Differences in causal direction, authority, scale, semantics, or constraints could invalidate the transfer.", "slug": "analogy"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Differences in causal direction, authority, scale, semantics, or constraints could invalidate the transfer.", "slug": "causality"}], "residual_id": "EXT001:structural_mapping_transfer:C02", "residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding."}}, "condition_id": "ext001_structural_mapping_transfer_a02", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored structural_problem, prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: Differences in causal direction, authority, scale, semantics, or constraints could invalidate the transfer.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Differences in causal direction, authority, scale, semantics, or constraints could invalidate the transfer."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Differences in causal direction, authority, scale, semantics, or constraints could invalidate the transfer.", "slug": "intervention_induced_model_invalidation"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Differences in causal direction, authority, scale, semantics, or constraints could invalidate the transfer.", "slug": "analogy"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: Differences in causal direction, authority, scale, semantics, or constraints could invalidate the transfer.", "slug": "causality"}], "normalized_requirement": "Differences in causal direction, authority, scale, semantics, or constraints could invalidate the transfer.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "UNRESOLVED_RETRIEVAL", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Differences in causal direction, authority, scale, semantics, or constraints could invalidate the transfer.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The proposed role and relation mapping can be tested against both domains.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored structural_problem, prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: The proposed role and relation mapping can be tested against both domains. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The proposed role and relation mapping can be tested against both domains.", "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored structural_problem, prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "The proposed role and relation mapping can be tested against both domains."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"candidate_ledger_sha256": "96f72d2139077fd57bf795048ebef33b3fd574b20963170080ec916b5b3b92fe", "extension_id": "new-archetypes-extension-001", "ledger_id": "prime-production-v1.2-extension-001", "ledger_sha256": "9644520614744632d1d36da44b1acd77ce432852c6083eb871203521c166efce"}, "base_projection_sha256": "841e0c7f3cb8e8054475ad29a8a14745a416b4fc115559a44878b94292e673ec", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "ca09ed9fe1598ce7072755b530de5553f5ee0a7cd64ae82d9e4a4e2149a37788", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Structure-Preserving Embedding Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:structure_preserving_embedding_design", "slug": "structure_preserving_embedding_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A source system must be represented, hosted, moved, compared, searched, or operated on inside a richer system, but naive placement destroys identities, relations, order, distance, constraints, or interpretability. The result is a representation that fits the host format while no longer faithfully carrying the source structure.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A source system must be represented, hosted, moved, compared, searched, or operated on inside a richer system, but naive placement destroys identities, relations, order, distance, constraints, or interpretability. The result is a representation that fits the host format while no longer faithfully carrying the source structure."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "An embedding places one object or structure inside a larger host space.", "role_mapping": "Source -> embedded object; larger system -> host.", "slug": "embedding", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b065_a12_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A source system must be represented, hosted, moved, compared, searched, or operated on inside a richer system, but naive placement destroys identities, relations, order, distance, constraints, or interpretability. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A model, dataset, concept system, workflow, graph, ontology, object, or institution must be placed inside a larger host space.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A model, dataset, concept system, workflow, graph, ontology, object, or institution must be placed inside a larger host space.", "A source system must be represented, hosted, moved, compared, searched, or operated on inside a richer system, but naive placement destroys identities, relations, order, distance, constraints, or interpretability."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Embedding", "one_liner": "A structure-preserving injection of one system faithfully into a richer one.", "page_ref": "prime:embedding", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source -> embedded object; larger system -> host.", "slug": "embedding", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "An embedding places one object or structure inside a larger host space."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A model, dataset, concept system, workflow, graph, ontology, object, or institution must be placed inside a larger host space.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Embeddability asks whether specified relations, distances, order, or operations can be preserved in the host.", "role_mapping": "Source relations -> preserved structure; host -> target space.", "slug": "embeddability", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b065_a12_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A source system must be represented, hosted, moved, compared, searched, or operated on inside a richer system, but naive placement destroys identities, relations, order, distance, constraints, or interpretability. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The source contains relations, distances, order, membership, roles, permissions, causal links, or operations that must survive the move.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The source contains relations, distances, order, membership, roles, permissions, causal links, or operations that must survive the move.", "A source system must be represented, hosted, moved, compared, searched, or operated on inside a richer system, but naive placement destroys identities, relations, order, distance, constraints, or interpretability."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Embeddability", "one_liner": "Whether a structured substrate admits a conflict-free placement inside a constrained ambient target.", "page_ref": "prime:embeddability", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source relations -> preserved structure; host -> target space.", "slug": "embeddability", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Embeddability asks whether specified relations, distances, order, or operations can be preserved in the host."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The source contains relations, distances, order, membership, roles, permissions, causal links, or operations that must survive the move.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An embedding may be injective and preserve distinctions perfectly.", "slug": "embedding"}], "residual_id": "r:structure_preserving_embedding_design:b065_a12_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b065_a12_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The result is a representation that fits the host format while no longer faithfully carrying the source structure. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Several source elements risk colliding, being flattened, or becoming indistinguishable inside the host representation.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Several source elements risk colliding, being flattened, or becoming indistinguishable inside the host representation.", "The result is a representation that fits the host format while no longer faithfully carrying the source structure."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An embedding may be injective and preserve distinctions perfectly.", "slug": "embedding"}], "normalized_requirement": "Several source elements risk colliding, being flattened, or becoming indistinguishable inside the host representation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Several source elements risk colliding, being flattened, or becoming indistinguishable inside the host representation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P102-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a source structure, a proposed transforming operation, and a resulting host or target representation.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A source is to be transformed by a proposed translation, encoding, migration, or equivalent operation.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the source's apparent-convenience contrast rather than only an obviously defective transformation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The proposed transformation appears convenient or easy to adopt.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail absence of an explicit preservation account for identities, relations, order, distance, constraints, or equivalent source structure.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The proposal cannot state which source structure the transformation preserves.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail absence of an explicit loss account rather than merely incomplete implementation detail.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The proposal cannot state which source structure the transformation loses.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "A proposed translation, encoding, or migration appears convenient while providing no account of which source structures it preserves or loses.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "apparently convenient transformation lacks a preservation-and-loss account", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P102-C02-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A well-specified embedding can state preservation and loss exactly.", "slug": "embedding"}], "residual_id": "r:structure_preserving_embedding_design:b065_a12_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b065_a12_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A proposed translation, encoding, or migration seems convenient but cannot explain what structure is preserved and what is lost. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A proposed translation, encoding, or migration seems convenient but cannot explain what structure is preserved and what is lost."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A well-specified embedding can state preservation and loss exactly.", "slug": "embedding"}], "normalized_requirement": "A proposed translation, encoding, or migration seems convenient but cannot explain what structure is preserved and what is lost.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A proposed translation, encoding, or migration seems convenient but cannot explain what structure is preserved and what is lost.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Some embeddings are isomorphisms onto their image and do preserve full relevant equivalence.", "slug": "embedding"}], "residual_id": "r:structure_preserving_embedding_design:b065_a12_c7", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b065_a12_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The system needs a bridge from a local form to a richer common space without falsely claiming full equivalence. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The system needs a bridge from a local form to a richer common space without falsely claiming full equivalence."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Some embeddings are isomorphisms onto their image and do preserve full relevant equivalence.", "slug": "embedding"}], "normalized_requirement": "The system needs a bridge from a local form to a richer common space without falsely claiming full equivalence.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The system needs a bridge from a local form to a richer common space without falsely claiming full equivalence.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The host has capabilities the source lacks, such as search, computation, comparison, visualization, routing, governance, or coordination.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A source system must be represented, hosted, moved, compared, searched, or operated on inside a richer system, but naive placement destroys identities, relations, order, distance, constraints, or interpretability. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The host has capabilities the source lacks, such as search, computation, comparison, visualization, routing, governance, or coordination. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The host has capabilities the source lacks, such as search, computation, comparison, visualization, routing, governance, or coordination.", "A source system must be represented, hosted, moved, compared, searched, or operated on inside a richer system, but naive placement destroys identities, relations, order, distance, constraints, or interpretability."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "The host has capabilities the source lacks, such as search, computation, comparison, visualization, routing, governance, or coordination."}, {"display_text": "Downstream use requires the embedded object to be interpreted, queried, reconstructed, aligned, or compared to other embedded objects.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Downstream use requires the embedded object to be interpreted, queried, reconstructed, aligned, or compared to other embedded objects. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Downstream use requires the embedded object to be interpreted, queried, reconstructed, aligned, or compared to other embedded objects."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Downstream use requires the embedded object to be interpreted, queried, reconstructed, aligned, or compared to other embedded objects."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 65, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-065", "ledger_sha256": "88a388b14afc2c1203840c289b66e7c3d00768892188a64a55989045fa3c59a3"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Structured Comparative Case Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:structured_comparative_case_design", "slug": "structured_comparative_case_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 8, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 8, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "8 of 8 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 8}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Unstructured comparison easily becomes persuasive storytelling. Convenient or outcome-selected cases are placed side by side, constructs drift across contexts, timelines do not align, and a striking difference is credited to a preferred cause. The intervention supplies a design in which every case has a reason to be present and every explanatory claim has a rival-facing test.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A causal or explanatory question spans naturally occurring cases that cannot be randomized, replicated on demand, or stripped of historical context. Unstructured juxtaposition invites cherry-picking, mismatched units, inconsistent measurement, temporal reversal, and conclusions broader than the selected cases. The design problem is to convert limited observational cases into a transparent inferential structure without pretending they are an experiment."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The comparative method explains similarities and differences across real cases.", "role_mapping": "Cases -> comparison units; outcomes -> contrasted results.", "slug": "comparative_method", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b065_a13_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Cases must be similar enough to compare and different enough to generate inferential leverage. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The question concerns why outcomes differ or remain similar across real cases.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The question concerns why outcomes differ or remain similar across real cases.", "Cases must be similar enough to compare and different enough to generate inferential leverage."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Comparative Method", "one_liner": "Systematically juxtaposing selected cases so that their similarities and differences do the causal-inference work that controlled experiments cannot.", "page_ref": "prime:comparative_method", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Cases -> comparison units; outcomes -> contrasted results.", "slug": "comparative_method", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The comparative method explains similarities and differences across real cases."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The question concerns why outcomes differ or remain similar across real cases.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "It is used where controlled random assignment is unavailable or inappropriate.", "role_mapping": "Real cases -> observational units; intervention -> infeasible control.", "slug": "comparative_method", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b065_a13_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Random assignment or controlled intervention is infeasible, unethical, or historically impossible. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Random assignment or controlled intervention is infeasible, unethical, or historically impossible."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Comparative Method", "one_liner": "Systematically juxtaposing selected cases so that their similarities and differences do the causal-inference work that controlled experiments cannot.", "page_ref": "prime:comparative_method", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Real cases -> observational units; intervention -> infeasible control.", "slug": "comparative_method", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "It is used where controlled random assignment is unavailable or inappropriate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Random assignment or controlled intervention is infeasible, unethical, or historically impossible.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A defensible comparison declares a bounded case universe.", "role_mapping": "Potential cases -> universe; selected cases -> sample.", "slug": "comparative_method", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b065_a13_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The cases must be selectable from a stated universe, comparable on named dimensions, and rich enough to test explanations within cases as well as across them. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A bounded universe of potentially comparable cases can be stated.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A bounded universe of potentially comparable cases can be stated.", "The cases must be selectable from a stated universe, comparable on named dimensions, and rich enough to test explanations within cases as well as across them."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Comparative Method", "one_liner": "Systematically juxtaposing selected cases so that their similarities and differences do the causal-inference work that controlled experiments cannot.", "page_ref": "prime:comparative_method", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Potential cases -> universe; selected cases -> sample.", "slug": "comparative_method", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A defensible comparison declares a bounded case universe."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A bounded universe of potentially comparable cases can be stated.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Case selection follows explicit contrast, most-similar, most-different, or replication logic.", "role_mapping": "Selection -> comparative design.", "slug": "comparative_method", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b065_a13_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Case selection can be justified by an explicit contrast or replication logic. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Case selection can be justified by an explicit contrast or replication logic."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Comparative Method", "one_liner": "Systematically juxtaposing selected cases so that their similarities and differences do the causal-inference work that controlled experiments cannot.", "page_ref": "prime:comparative_method", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Selection -> comparative design.", "slug": "comparative_method", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Case selection follows explicit contrast, most-similar, most-different, or replication logic."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Case selection can be justified by an explicit contrast or replication logic.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Comparative inference combines cross-case evidence with within-case process evidence.", "role_mapping": "Across cases -> variation; within cases -> traces.", "slug": "comparative_method", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b065_a13_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The cases must be selectable from a stated universe, comparable on named dimensions, and rich enough to test explanations within cases as well as across them. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Evidence exists both across cases and within at least some cases over time.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Evidence exists both across cases and within at least some cases over time.", "The cases must be selectable from a stated universe, comparable on named dimensions, and rich enough to test explanations within cases as well as across them."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Comparative Method", "one_liner": "Systematically juxtaposing selected cases so that their similarities and differences do the causal-inference work that controlled experiments cannot.", "page_ref": "prime:comparative_method", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Across cases -> variation; within cases -> traces.", "slug": "comparative_method", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Comparative inference combines cross-case evidence with within-case process evidence."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Evidence exists both across cases and within at least some cases over time.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Constructs must be operationalized comparably across contexts.", "role_mapping": "Construct -> common concept; observations -> case measures.", "slug": "comparative_method", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b065_a13_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Convenient or outcome-selected cases are placed side by side, constructs drift across contexts, timelines do not align, and a striking difference is credited to a preferred cause. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Constructs can be translated into sufficiently equivalent observations across contexts.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Constructs can be translated into sufficiently equivalent observations across contexts.", "Convenient or outcome-selected cases are placed side by side, constructs drift across contexts, timelines do not align, and a striking difference is credited to a preferred cause."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Comparative Method", "one_liner": "Systematically juxtaposing selected cases so that their similarities and differences do the causal-inference work that controlled experiments cannot.", "page_ref": "prime:comparative_method", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Construct -> common concept; observations -> case measures.", "slug": "comparative_method", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Constructs must be operationalized comparably across contexts."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Constructs can be translated into sufficiently equivalent observations across contexts.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Rival explanations are tested against their differing observable implications across cases.", "role_mapping": "Rivals -> hypotheses; observations -> discriminating evidence.", "slug": "comparative_method", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b065_a13_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The cases must be selectable from a stated universe, comparable on named dimensions, and rich enough to test explanations within cases as well as across them. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Rival explanations can be named and tested against observable implications.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Rival explanations can be named and tested against observable implications.", "The cases must be selectable from a stated universe, comparable on named dimensions, and rich enough to test explanations within cases as well as across them."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Comparative Method", "one_liner": "Systematically juxtaposing selected cases so that their similarities and differences do the causal-inference work that controlled experiments cannot.", "page_ref": "prime:comparative_method", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Rivals -> hypotheses; observations -> discriminating evidence.", "slug": "comparative_method", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Rival explanations are tested against their differing observable implications across cases."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Rival explanations can be named and tested against observable implications.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Claims are limited to declared populations, periods, mechanisms, and scope conditions.", "role_mapping": "Inference -> conclusion; declared scope -> boundary.", "slug": "comparative_method", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b065_a13_c8", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The intended inference can be limited to declared populations, periods, mechanisms, and conditions. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The intended inference can be limited to declared populations, periods, mechanisms, and conditions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Comparative Method", "one_liner": "Systematically juxtaposing selected cases so that their similarities and differences do the causal-inference work that controlled experiments cannot.", "page_ref": "prime:comparative_method", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Inference -> conclusion; declared scope -> boundary.", "slug": "comparative_method", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Claims are limited to declared populations, periods, mechanisms, and scope conditions."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The intended inference can be limited to declared populations, periods, mechanisms, and conditions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [8], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 65, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-065", "ledger_sha256": "88a388b14afc2c1203840c289b66e7c3d00768892188a64a55989045fa3c59a3"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Structured Expert Judgment Iteration", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:structured_expert_judgment_iteration", "slug": "structured_expert_judgment_iteration"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 5, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is that expert judgment is valuable and fragile at the same time. Experts know things that are not yet fully measurable, but they are also subject to cognitive bias, institutional incentives, disciplinary blind spots, reputation concerns, and social pressure. When a group simply talks, the final recommendation may reflect status and momentum more than evidence.\n\nThe failure signature is an opaque “expert consensus” that hides how judgments were formed. Averages hide polarized estimates. Committee reports hide minority warnings. One-time surveys hide whether experts would revise after seeing counterarguments. Ordinary meetings hide whose assumptions shaped the room.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A decision depends on expert judgment, but unstructured expert discussion is biased by status, groupthink, anchoring, or premature consensus."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The Delphi method elicits expert judgment when direct evidence is incomplete.", "role_mapping": "Experts -> panel; incomplete evidence -> judgment task.", "slug": "delphi_method", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b065_a14_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Expertise is most needed when evidence is incomplete, but experts themselves are embedded in status systems, disciplinary frames, incentives, and cognitive limits. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Evidence is incomplete but relevant expertise exists.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Evidence is incomplete but relevant expertise exists.", "Expertise is most needed when evidence is incomplete, but experts themselves are embedded in status systems, disciplinary frames, incentives, and cognitive limits."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Delphi Method", "one_liner": "Expert consensus iteration.", "page_ref": "prime:delphi_method", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Experts -> panel; incomplete evidence -> judgment task.", "slug": "delphi_method", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The Delphi method elicits expert judgment when direct evidence is incomplete."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Evidence is incomplete but relevant expertise exists.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Anonymous structured rounds are designed to limit dominance, conformity, and unstructured discussion effects.", "role_mapping": "Unstructured distortion -> panel bias; controlled rounds -> Delphi process.", "slug": "delphi_method", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b065_a14_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A decision depends on expert judgment, but unstructured expert discussion is biased by status, groupthink, anchoring, or premature consensus. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Unstructured discussion is likely to distort judgment.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Unstructured discussion is likely to distort judgment.", "A decision depends on expert judgment, but unstructured expert discussion is biased by status, groupthink, anchoring, or premature consensus."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Delphi Method", "one_liner": "Expert consensus iteration.", "page_ref": "prime:delphi_method", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Unstructured distortion -> panel bias; controlled rounds -> Delphi process.", "slug": "delphi_method", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Anonymous structured rounds are designed to limit dominance, conformity, and unstructured discussion effects."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Unstructured discussion is likely to distort judgment.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Delphi aggregates the center and dispersion of expert estimates rather than forcing a single unsupported answer.", "role_mapping": "Central tendency -> aggregate judgment; uncertainty -> spread.", "slug": "delphi_method", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b065_a14_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A decision needs both central tendency and uncertainty. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A decision needs both central tendency and uncertainty."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Delphi Method", "one_liner": "Expert consensus iteration.", "page_ref": "prime:delphi_method", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Central tendency -> aggregate judgment; uncertainty -> spread.", "slug": "delphi_method", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Delphi aggregates the center and dispersion of expert estimates rather than forcing a single unsupported answer."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A decision needs both central tendency and uncertainty.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Controlled feedback between rounds permits experts to revise and improve judgments.", "role_mapping": "Feedback -> round summary; improvement -> revision.", "slug": "delphi_method", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b065_a14_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Independent elicitation and anonymized feedback let the system hear the distribution of expert judgment before social convergence begins. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Judgments can improve through controlled feedback.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Judgments can improve through controlled feedback.", "Independent elicitation and anonymized feedback let the system hear the distribution of expert judgment before social convergence begins."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Delphi Method", "one_liner": "Expert consensus iteration.", "page_ref": "prime:delphi_method", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Feedback -> round summary; improvement -> revision.", "slug": "delphi_method", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Controlled feedback between rounds permits experts to revise and improve judgments."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Judgments can improve through controlled feedback.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Recorded rounds, rationales, and aggregation make expert input auditable.", "role_mapping": "Expert input -> elicited record; later audit -> round history.", "slug": "delphi_method", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b065_a14_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Expert input must be auditable later. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Expert input must be auditable later."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Delphi Method", "one_liner": "Expert consensus iteration.", "page_ref": "prime:delphi_method", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Expert input -> elicited record; later audit -> round history.", "slug": "delphi_method", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Recorded rounds, rationales, and aggregation make expert input auditable."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Expert input must be auditable later.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Persistent disagreement is decision-relevant.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Persistent disagreement is decision-relevant. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Persistent disagreement is decision-relevant."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Persistent disagreement is decision-relevant."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 65, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-065", "ledger_sha256": "88a388b14afc2c1203840c289b66e7c3d00768892188a64a55989045fa3c59a3"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Structured Sensemaking", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:structured_sensemaking", "slug": "structured_sensemaking"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 3 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is an interpretation gap under uncertainty. People observe the same situation but connect the signals into different stories, or they cannot connect them into any actionable account at all. Because each actor acts from their own frame, coordination becomes fragile: one group treats the situation as routine, another as urgent, another as political, another as technical, and another as evidence of deeper systemic failure.\n\nWithout structure, the first coherent narrative often wins. That narrative may come from the highest-status participant, the loudest data source, the most familiar past pattern, or the story that protects the organization from embarrassment. The result can be false convergence, paralysis, contradictory action, or overconfident communication.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "People observe the same situation but interpret it differently or cannot connect observations into an actionable narrative."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Sensemaking is triggered when novelty, ambiguity, or surprise defeats existing categories.", "role_mapping": "Situation -> equivocal event; categories -> interpretive frames.", "slug": "sensemaking", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b065_a15_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The situation may be a crisis, a strategic shift, an incident, a contested community problem, a weak-signal pattern, or a complex cross-functional problem where different actors hold different pieces of the picture. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A situation is ambiguous, novel, surprising, fast-moving, or complex enough that existing categories do not immediately explain it.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A situation is ambiguous, novel, surprising, fast-moving, or complex enough that existing categories do not immediately explain it.", "The situation may be a crisis, a strategic shift, an incident, a contested community problem, a weak-signal pattern, or a complex cross-functional problem where different actors hold different pieces of the picture."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Sensemaking", "one_liner": "Interpret ambiguous situations.", "page_ref": "prime:sensemaking", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Situation -> equivocal event; categories -> interpretive frames.", "slug": "sensemaking", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Sensemaking is triggered when novelty, ambiguity, or surprise defeats existing categories."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A situation is ambiguous, novel, surprising, fast-moving, or complex enough that existing categories do not immediately explain it.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Sensemaking can be individual or shared among actors with compatible frames.", "slug": "sensemaking"}], "residual_id": "r:structured_sensemaking:b065_a15_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b065_a15_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when the same event is being read through incompatible frames; when signals are partial, distributed, or noisy; when a group must act before certainty is complete; or when a premature official story would hide dissent and future learning. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Different actors see different signals and interpret the same event through incompatible frames.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Different actors see different signals and interpret the same event through incompatible frames.", "It is especially useful when the same event is being read through incompatible frames; when signals are partial, distributed, or noisy; when a group must act before certainty is complete; or when a premature official story would hide dissent and future learning."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Sensemaking can be individual or shared among actors with compatible frames.", "slug": "sensemaking"}], "normalized_requirement": "Different actors see different signals and interpret the same event through incompatible frames.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Different actors see different signals and interpret the same event through incompatible frames.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P102-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve plural narratives with a shared focal situation rather than unrelated stories.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Multiple narratives about the same situation are forming among participants.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail incompatible interpretations rather than merely diverse but compatible accounts.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The narratives conflict with one another.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve informal formation that is not itself a deliberate surfacing-and-testing process, without requiring that examination later occurs.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The conflicting narratives form informally outside deliberate surfacing and testing.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the conditional behavioral force of unexamined narratives rather than narrative conflict with no action consequence.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "If the narratives remain unsurfaced and untested, they may influence or drive behavior.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "Conflicting narratives are forming informally and may drive behavior if they are not surfaced and tested.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "unexamined conflicting narratives may drive behavior", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P102-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Narratives can coexist without conflict or behavioral force.", "slug": "narrative"}], "residual_id": "r:structured_sensemaking:b065_a15_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b065_a15_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Conflicting narratives are forming informally and may drive behavior if they are not surfaced and tested. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Conflicting narratives are forming informally and may drive behavior if they are not surfaced and tested."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Narratives can coexist without conflict or behavioral force.", "slug": "narrative"}], "normalized_requirement": "Conflicting narratives are forming informally and may drive behavior if they are not surfaced and tested.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Conflicting narratives are forming informally and may drive behavior if they are not surfaced and tested.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A group must coordinate action before complete certainty is available.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when the same event is being read through incompatible frames; when signals are partial, distributed, or noisy; when a group must act before certainty is complete; or when a premature official story would hide dissent and future learning. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: A group must coordinate action before complete certainty is available. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A group must coordinate action before complete certainty is available.", "It is especially useful when the same event is being read through incompatible frames; when signals are partial, distributed, or noisy; when a group must act before certainty is complete; or when a premature official story would hide dissent and future learning."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "A group must coordinate action before complete certainty is available."}, {"display_text": "Leaders, teams, or communities need to communicate what is happening without pretending away uncertainty.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: Leaders, teams, or communities need to communicate what is happening without pretending away uncertainty. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Leaders, teams, or communities need to communicate what is happening without pretending away uncertainty."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Leaders, teams, or communities need to communicate what is happening without pretending away uncertainty."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 65, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-065", "ledger_sha256": "88a388b14afc2c1203840c289b66e7c3d00768892188a64a55989045fa3c59a3"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Subcritical Priming for Faster Threshold Crossing", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:subcritical_priming_for_faster_threshold_crossing", "slug": "subcritical_priming_for_faster_threshold_crossing"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 1, "statement": "1 of 3 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Threshold transitions are discontinuous enough that timing matters. A system may sit below threshold for a long time, then shift quickly once enough variables align. If preparation begins only after the trigger arrives, the opportunity may be lost to coordination lag, missing resources, absent trust, or cold-start confusion. If preparation is pushed too far, however, the system can cross too early, creating false readiness, instability, waste, backlash, or ethical violations.\n\nThe structural tension is proximity versus restraint: the system should be close enough to cross quickly, but not so close that noise, pressure, or manipulation causes premature crossing.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system needs to cross a threshold into a desired ordered state, but beginning from an unprepared baseline creates slow uptake, coordination lag, wasted trigger opportunities, or chaotic transition. Directly forcing the threshold too early can cause backlash, instability, false readiness, ethical problems, or premature cascade."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A threshold necessarily separates subcritical incremental change from a qualitative transition.", "role_mapping": "Desired effect -> threshold crossing; linear improvement -> subcritical response.", "slug": "threshold", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b066_a01_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system needs to cross a threshold into a desired ordered state, but beginning from an unprepared baseline creates slow uptake, coordination lag, wasted trigger opportunities, or chaotic transition. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The desired effect requires a threshold crossing rather than linear incremental improvement.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The desired effect requires a threshold crossing rather than linear incremental improvement.", "A system needs to cross a threshold into a desired ordered state, but beginning from an unprepared baseline creates slow uptake, coordination lag, wasted trigger opportunities, or chaotic transition."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Threshold", "one_liner": "Safe vs harmful levels.", "page_ref": "prime:threshold", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Desired effect -> threshold crossing; linear improvement -> subcritical response.", "slug": "threshold", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A threshold necessarily separates subcritical incremental change from a qualitative transition."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The desired effect requires a threshold crossing rather than linear incremental improvement.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Preparation can finish without any thresholded transition.", "slug": "preparation"}], "residual_id": "r:subcritical_priming_for_faster_threshold_crossing:b066_a01_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b066_a01_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Do not use it for ordinary incremental improvement, generic readiness checklists, or cases where the transition has already happened. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The system can be moved closer to readiness without fully activating the transition.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The system can be moved closer to readiness without fully activating the transition.", "Do not use it for ordinary incremental improvement, generic readiness checklists, or cases where the transition has already happened."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Preparation can finish without any thresholded transition.", "slug": "preparation"}], "normalized_requirement": "The system can be moved closer to readiness without fully activating the transition.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The system can be moved closer to readiness without fully activating the transition.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P102-C04", "dnf": [], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [], "predicate": "A foreseeable trigger, window, event, decision, or condition should convert readiness into action.", "resolution": "SOURCE_DEFECT", "semantic_scope": "SOURCE_DEFECT", "structural_head": "foreseeable activation condition should convert readiness into action", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P102-C04-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Preparation need not be keyed to a known trigger.", "slug": "preparation"}], "residual_id": "r:subcritical_priming_for_faster_threshold_crossing:b066_a01_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b066_a01_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when a triggering moment is foreseeable but cannot be rushed, such as a formal launch, public event, alert condition, environmental change, or authorization decision. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: There is a foreseeable trigger, window, event, decision, or condition that should convert readiness into action.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["There is a foreseeable trigger, window, event, decision, or condition that should convert readiness into action.", "It is especially useful when a triggering moment is foreseeable but cannot be rushed, such as a formal launch, public event, alert condition, environmental change, or authorization decision."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "SOURCE_REVIEW_REQUIRED", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 1, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Preparation need not be keyed to a known trigger.", "slug": "preparation"}], "normalized_requirement": "There is a foreseeable trigger, window, event, decision, or condition that should convert readiness into action.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "SOURCE_REVIEW_REQUIRED", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later candidate-blind atomization found that the source wording lacks a relation required by its diagnostic reading, so this is a source-repair issue rather than evidence of a missing abstraction."}, "predicate": "There is a foreseeable trigger, window, event, decision, or condition that should convert readiness into action.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Cold-start activation would be too slow, expensive, fragmented, or uncertain.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "If preparation begins only after the trigger arrives, the opportunity may be lost to coordination lag, missing resources, absent trust, or cold-start confusion. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Cold-start activation would be too slow, expensive, fragmented, or uncertain. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Cold-start activation would be too slow, expensive, fragmented, or uncertain.", "If preparation begins only after the trigger arrives, the opportunity may be lost to coordination lag, missing resources, absent trust, or cold-start confusion."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Cold-start activation would be too slow, expensive, fragmented, or uncertain."}, {"display_text": "Premature activation would create meaningful risk, waste, coercion, or irreversible transition.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system needs to cross a threshold into a desired ordered state, but beginning from an unprepared baseline creates slow uptake, coordination lag, wasted trigger opportunities, or chaotic transition. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: Premature activation would create meaningful risk, waste, coercion, or irreversible transition. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Premature activation would create meaningful risk, waste, coercion, or irreversible transition.", "A system needs to cross a threshold into a desired ordered state, but beginning from an unprepared baseline creates slow uptake, coordination lag, wasted trigger opportunities, or chaotic transition."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Premature activation would create meaningful risk, waste, coercion, or irreversible transition."}, {"display_text": "Readiness can be monitored with leading indicators rather than inferred after failure.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: Readiness can be monitored with leading indicators rather than inferred after failure. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Readiness can be monitored with leading indicators rather than inferred after failure."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Readiness can be monitored with leading indicators rather than inferred after failure."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 66, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-066", "ledger_sha256": "2bf812b2dfb8ba2fd636e5e63308837186363ed0b4460c807b593e6b6506a264"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Subgroup Deliberation and Recombination", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:subgroup_deliberation_and_recombination", "slug": "subgroup_deliberation_and_recombination"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 2 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 2}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A group needs shared judgment, prioritization, or consensus, but plenary discussion is producing premature closure, shallow participation, conformity, uninspected assumptions, or a lowest-common-denominator answer. Individual dissent protection alone is insufficient because the task requires interaction, evidence exchange, and synthesis; simple aggregation is insufficient because the group needs reasons, not just votes.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A group needs shared judgment, prioritization, or consensus, but plenary discussion is producing premature closure, shallow participation, conformity, uninspected assumptions, or a lowest-common-denominator answer. Individual dissent protection alone is insufficient because the task requires interaction, evidence exchange, and synthesis; simple aggregation is insufficient because the group needs reasons, not just votes."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P102-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a large deliberating group and a comparatively small speaker subset.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A discussion involves a large group and a smaller subset of participating speakers.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail disproportionate control of speaking or deliberative space rather than mere visibility.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The small subset dominates the discussion.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires status-based dominance by the small speaker subset.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The dominating participants have high status.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires speech-speed-based dominance by the small speaker subset.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The dominating participants are fast-speaking.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A large-group discussion is dominated by a few participants who are high-status or fast-speaking.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "few high-status or fast-speaking participants dominate large-group discussion", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P102-C05-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Groupthink can arise through conformity without overt speaking dominance.", "slug": "groupthink"}], "residual_id": "r:subgroup_deliberation_and_recombination:b066_a02_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b066_a02_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A group needs shared judgment, prioritization, or consensus, but plenary discussion is producing premature closure, shallow participation, conformity, uninspected assumptions, or a lowest-common-denominator answer. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A large group discussion is dominated by a few high-status or fast-speaking participants.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A large group discussion is dominated by a few high-status or fast-speaking participants.", "A group needs shared judgment, prioritization, or consensus, but plenary discussion is producing premature closure, shallow participation, conformity, uninspected assumptions, or a lowest-common-denominator answer."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Groupthink can arise through conformity without overt speaking dominance.", "slug": "groupthink"}], "normalized_requirement": "A large group discussion is dominated by a few high-status or fast-speaking participants.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A large group discussion is dominated by a few high-status or fast-speaking participants.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Groupthink necessarily produces premature apparent consensus despite uncertainty or heterogeneous evidence.", "role_mapping": "Quick consensus -> conformity; complex evidence -> suppressed dissent.", "slug": "groupthink", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b066_a02_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Consensus appears quickly despite high uncertainty, complex evidence, or heterogeneous stakeholder interests. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Consensus appears quickly despite high uncertainty, complex evidence, or heterogeneous stakeholder interests."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Groupthink", "one_liner": "Conformity overrides realism.", "page_ref": "prime:groupthink", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Quick consensus -> conformity; complex evidence -> suppressed dissent.", "slug": "groupthink", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Groupthink necessarily produces premature apparent consensus despite uncertainty or heterogeneous evidence."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Consensus appears quickly despite high uncertainty, complex evidence, or heterogeneous stakeholder interests.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A committee must decide among options that require both local expertise and whole-group integration.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Individual dissent protection alone is insufficient because the task requires interaction, evidence exchange, and synthesis; simple aggregation is insufficient because the group needs reasons, not just votes. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: A committee must decide among options that require both local expertise and whole-group integration. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A committee must decide among options that require both local expertise and whole-group integration.", "Individual dissent protection alone is insufficient because the task requires interaction, evidence exchange, and synthesis; simple aggregation is insufficient because the group needs reasons, not just votes."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "A committee must decide among options that require both local expertise and whole-group integration."}, {"display_text": "The group has known factions, departments, disciplines, or stakeholder categories whose assumptions differ.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A group needs shared judgment, prioritization, or consensus, but plenary discussion is producing premature closure, shallow participation, conformity, uninspected assumptions, or a lowest-common-denominator answer. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The group has known factions, departments, disciplines, or stakeholder categories whose assumptions differ. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The group has known factions, departments, disciplines, or stakeholder categories whose assumptions differ.", "A group needs shared judgment, prioritization, or consensus, but plenary discussion is producing premature closure, shallow participation, conformity, uninspected assumptions, or a lowest-common-denominator answer."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The group has known factions, departments, disciplines, or stakeholder categories whose assumptions differ."}, {"display_text": "A workshop, jury, review board, or planning session needs every participant to contribute without losing a final shared decision.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: A workshop, jury, review board, or planning session needs every participant to contribute without losing a final shared decision. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A workshop, jury, review board, or planning session needs every participant to contribute without losing a final shared decision."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "A workshop, jury, review board, or planning session needs every participant to contribute without losing a final shared decision."}, {"display_text": "A decision process needs to document disagreement, not merely announce the final result.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: A decision process needs to document disagreement, not merely announce the final result. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A decision process needs to document disagreement, not merely announce the final result."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "A decision process needs to document disagreement, not merely announce the final result."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 66, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-066", "ledger_sha256": "2bf812b2dfb8ba2fd636e5e63308837186363ed0b4460c807b593e6b6506a264"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Substrate Lineage Risk Audit", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:substrate_lineage_risk_audit", "slug": "substrate_lineage_risk_audit"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 6, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 6, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "6 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system is built on a borrowed or inherited substrate whose origin assumptions, vulnerabilities, constraints, maintainer conditions, defaults, privileges, or data artifacts are outside the local audit boundary. Because the substrate is treated as trusted background, latent risk travels through the inheritance channel and concentrates exactly where owners and reviewers are least likely to inspect.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system is built on a borrowed or inherited substrate whose origin assumptions, vulnerabilities, constraints, maintainer conditions, defaults, privileges, or data artifacts are outside the local audit boundary. Because the substrate is treated as trusted background, latent risk travels through the inheritance channel and concentrates exactly where owners and reviewers are least likely to inspect."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime requires dependence on a borrowed, vendor, legacy, or transitive substrate.", "role_mapping": "Current system -> dependent layer; borrowed component -> substrate.", "slug": "inherited_substrate_risk", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b066_a03_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The substrate can be technical, informational, procedural, or institutional. In this condition set, the requirement is: A current system depends on a borrowed, inherited, vendor, open-source, platform, base-image, template, dataset, runtime, framework, or legacy substrate.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A current system depends on a borrowed, inherited, vendor, open-source, platform, base-image, template, dataset, runtime, framework, or legacy substrate."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Inherited-Substrate Risk", "one_liner": "A system built on a borrowed or inherited substrate carries forward latent conditions of the substrate's origin through an inheritance channel that the new system's audit boundary does not cross, so the risk concentrates exactly where attention does not.", "page_ref": "prime:inherited_substrate_risk", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Current system -> dependent layer; borrowed component -> substrate.", "slug": "inherited_substrate_risk", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime requires dependence on a borrowed, vendor, legacy, or transitive substrate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A current system depends on a borrowed, inherited, vendor, open-source, platform, base-image, template, dataset, runtime, framework, or legacy substrate.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Inherited risk is missed when review inspects only the new local layer.", "role_mapping": "Local review -> top layer; lineage -> inherited substrate.", "slug": "inherited_substrate_risk", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b066_a03_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The defining blind spot is an audit boundary that stops too soon. In this condition set, the requirement is: Local review focuses on the new layer, not on the inherited substrate lineage.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Local review focuses on the new layer, not on the inherited substrate lineage."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Inherited-Substrate Risk", "one_liner": "A system built on a borrowed or inherited substrate carries forward latent conditions of the substrate's origin through an inheritance channel that the new system's audit boundary does not cross, so the risk concentrates exactly where attention does not.", "page_ref": "prime:inherited_substrate_risk", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Local review -> top layer; lineage -> inherited substrate.", "slug": "inherited_substrate_risk", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Inherited risk is missed when review inspects only the new local layer."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Local review focuses on the new layer, not on the inherited substrate lineage.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Origin assumptions that differ from current use are a defining inherited-risk path.", "role_mapping": "Origin context -> substrate assumptions; current context -> deployment.", "slug": "inherited_substrate_risk", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b066_a03_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Mismatch can involve scale, threat model, data population, legal regime, operating environment, incentives, or users. In this condition set, the requirement is: The substrate has origin assumptions or conditions different from the current use context.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The substrate has origin assumptions or conditions different from the current use context."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Inherited-Substrate Risk", "one_liner": "A system built on a borrowed or inherited substrate carries forward latent conditions of the substrate's origin through an inheritance channel that the new system's audit boundary does not cross, so the risk concentrates exactly where attention does not.", "page_ref": "prime:inherited_substrate_risk", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Origin context -> substrate assumptions; current context -> deployment.", "slug": "inherited_substrate_risk", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Origin assumptions that differ from current use are a defining inherited-risk path."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The substrate has origin assumptions or conditions different from the current use context.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Defaults, transitive dependencies, privileges, interfaces, and artifacts carry risk forward through lineage.", "role_mapping": "Inherited feature -> propagated risk.", "slug": "inherited_substrate_risk", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b066_a03_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The inheritance channel must be able to preserve more than superficial form. In this condition set, the requirement is: The substrate can carry risk forward through defaults, transitive dependencies, hidden privileges, inherited interfaces, old versions, data artifacts, or copied routines.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The substrate can carry risk forward through defaults, transitive dependencies, hidden privileges, inherited interfaces, old versions, data artifacts, or copied routines."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Inherited-Substrate Risk", "one_liner": "A system built on a borrowed or inherited substrate carries forward latent conditions of the substrate's origin through an inheritance channel that the new system's audit boundary does not cross, so the risk concentrates exactly where attention does not.", "page_ref": "prime:inherited_substrate_risk", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Inherited feature -> propagated risk.", "slug": "inherited_substrate_risk", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Defaults, transitive dependencies, privileges, interfaces, and artifacts carry risk forward through lineage."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The substrate can carry risk forward through defaults, transitive dependencies, hidden privileges, inherited interfaces, old versions, data artifacts, or copied routines.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Material dependency or privilege makes upstream substrate failure consequential.", "role_mapping": "Centrality -> exposure; substrate failure -> system impact.", "slug": "inherited_substrate_risk", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b066_a03_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Minor inherited artifacts may not justify the full audit. In this condition set, the requirement is: The current system has enough dependency, privilege, exposure, or operational centrality that substrate failure would matter.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The current system has enough dependency, privilege, exposure, or operational centrality that substrate failure would matter."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Inherited-Substrate Risk", "one_liner": "A system built on a borrowed or inherited substrate carries forward latent conditions of the substrate's origin through an inheritance channel that the new system's audit boundary does not cross, so the risk concentrates exactly where attention does not.", "page_ref": "prime:inherited_substrate_risk", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Centrality -> exposure; substrate failure -> system impact.", "slug": "inherited_substrate_risk", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Material dependency or privilege makes upstream substrate failure consequential."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The current system has enough dependency, privilege, exposure, or operational centrality that substrate failure would matter.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Opaque ownership, stale provenance, and weak upstream monitoring prevent reliable lineage control.", "role_mapping": "Upstream support -> lineage governance.", "slug": "inherited_substrate_risk", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b066_a03_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Lineage opacity increases the need for explicit risk decisions. In this condition set, the requirement is: Upstream ownership, support, or provenance is incomplete, stale, opaque, or weakly monitored.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Upstream ownership, support, or provenance is incomplete, stale, opaque, or weakly monitored."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Inherited-Substrate Risk", "one_liner": "A system built on a borrowed or inherited substrate carries forward latent conditions of the substrate's origin through an inheritance channel that the new system's audit boundary does not cross, so the risk concentrates exactly where attention does not.", "page_ref": "prime:inherited_substrate_risk", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Upstream support -> lineage governance.", "slug": "inherited_substrate_risk", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Opaque ownership, stale provenance, and weak upstream monitoring prevent reliable lineage control."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Upstream ownership, support, or provenance is incomplete, stale, opaque, or weakly monitored.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 66, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-066", "ledger_sha256": "2bf812b2dfb8ba2fd636e5e63308837186363ed0b4460c807b593e6b6506a264"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Sufficiency-Bounded Work Containment", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:sufficiency_bounded_work_containment", "slug": "sufficiency_bounded_work_containment"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "An elastic activity expands to consume its allocated container because there is no independent sufficiency criterion, no trusted stop-short trigger, and no visible opportunity cost for using the remaining resource.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "An elastic activity expands to consume its allocated container because there is no independent sufficiency criterion, no trusted stop-short trigger, and no visible opportunity cost for using the remaining resource."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Parkinson's law requires work capable of expanding to consume the time or resources available.", "role_mapping": "Task -> work; available container -> allotted resource.", "slug": "parkinsons_law", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b066_a04_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The task, meeting, review, project, process, or administrative routine can absorb additional time, budget, attention, staff, or procedural detail without a natural endpoint. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The task, meeting, review, project, process, or administrative routine can absorb additional time, budget, attention, staff, or procedural detail without a natural endpoint."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Parkinson's Law", "one_liner": "An elastic activity expands to fill its allocated resource container up to the binding constraint when no counter-pressure calls a stop short of the wall.", "page_ref": "prime:parkinsons_law", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Task -> work; available container -> allotted resource.", "slug": "parkinsons_law", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Parkinson's law requires work capable of expanding to consume the time or resources available."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The task, meeting, review, project, process, or administrative routine can absorb additional time, budget, attention, staff, or procedural detail without a natural endpoint.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The available container is interpreted as the amount work should fill rather than a ceiling.", "role_mapping": "Visible container -> allotted time; expected use -> expansion.", "slug": "parkinsons_law", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b066_a04_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "An elastic activity expands to consume its allocated container because there is no independent sufficiency criterion, no trusted stop-short trigger, and no visible opportunity cost for using the remaining resource. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The available container is visible and socially interpreted as what should be used rather than as a maximum not to exceed.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The available container is visible and socially interpreted as what should be used rather than as a maximum not to exceed.", "An elastic activity expands to consume its allocated container because there is no independent sufficiency criterion, no trusted stop-short trigger, and no visible opportunity cost for using the remaining resource."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Parkinson's Law", "one_liner": "An elastic activity expands to fill its allocated resource container up to the binding constraint when no counter-pressure calls a stop short of the wall.", "page_ref": "prime:parkinsons_law", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Visible container -> allotted time; expected use -> expansion.", "slug": "parkinsons_law", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The available container is interpreted as the amount work should fill rather than a ceiling."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The available container is visible and socially interpreted as what should be used rather than as a maximum not to exceed.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P102-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve an actor and a behavior that contains work or leaves allocated resources unused.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An actor can finish early, return budget, shrink scope, stop at good-enough quality, or perform equivalent stop-short behavior.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve resource containment rather than an unrelated early exit.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The stop-short behavior conserves time, budget, scope, or quality effort within an allocated work container.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires absence of positive institutional reward for conserving the resource.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The stop-short behavior receives no reward.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a punitive risk attached to the resource-containing behavior.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The stop-short behavior exposes the actor to possible punishment.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Finishing early, returning budget, shrinking scope, or stopping at good-enough quality is not rewarded or may be punished.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "resource-conserving stop-short behavior is unrewarded or punishable", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P102-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Scope creep can occur even when early completion is rewarded.", "slug": "scope_creep"}], "residual_id": "r:sufficiency_bounded_work_containment:b066_a04_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b066_a04_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Finishing early, returning budget, shrinking scope, or stopping at good-enough quality is not rewarded or may be punished. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Finishing early, returning budget, shrinking scope, or stopping at good-enough quality is not rewarded or may be punished."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Scope creep can occur even when early completion is rewarded.", "slug": "scope_creep"}], "normalized_requirement": "Finishing early, returning budget, shrinking scope, or stopping at good-enough quality is not rewarded or may be punished.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Finishing early, returning budget, shrinking scope, or stopping at good-enough quality is not rewarded or may be punished.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Objective creep can change goals without favoring polish or ceremony.", "slug": "objective_creep"}], "residual_id": "r:sufficiency_bounded_work_containment:b066_a04_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b066_a04_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Actors are safer adding polish, ceremony, review, or scope than declaring sufficiency. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Actors are safer adding polish, ceremony, review, or scope than declaring sufficiency."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Objective creep can change goals without favoring polish or ceremony.", "slug": "objective_creep"}], "normalized_requirement": "Actors are safer adding polish, ceremony, review, or scope than declaring sufficiency.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Actors are safer adding polish, ceremony, review, or scope than declaring sufficiency.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Vague completion criteria permit work to be renegotiated until the resource deadline.", "role_mapping": "Resource wall -> allotted limit; shifting completion -> work expansion.", "slug": "parkinsons_law", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b066_a04_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Completion criteria are vague, subjective, or continuously renegotiated near the resource wall. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Completion criteria are vague, subjective, or continuously renegotiated near the resource wall."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Parkinson's Law", "one_liner": "An elastic activity expands to fill its allocated resource container up to the binding constraint when no counter-pressure calls a stop short of the wall.", "page_ref": "prime:parkinsons_law", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Resource wall -> allotted limit; shifting completion -> work expansion.", "slug": "parkinsons_law", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Vague completion criteria permit work to be renegotiated until the resource deadline."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Completion criteria are vague, subjective, or continuously renegotiated near the resource wall.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The opportunity cost of the last units of effort is diffuse, off-book, or borne by other work.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The same scarcity that should create discipline can instead become a filling target when the container is explicit but sufficiency, opportunity cost, and return-of-capacity incentives are weak. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The opportunity cost of the last units of effort is diffuse, off-book, or borne by other work. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The opportunity cost of the last units of effort is diffuse, off-book, or borne by other work.", "The same scarcity that should create discipline can instead become a filling target when the container is explicit but sufficiency, opportunity cost, and return-of-capacity incentives are weak."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The opportunity cost of the last units of effort is diffuse, off-book, or borne by other work."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 66, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-066", "ledger_sha256": "2bf812b2dfb8ba2fd636e5e63308837186363ed0b4460c807b593e6b6506a264"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Summary-Substance Alignment Audit", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:summary_substance_alignment_audit", "slug": "summary_substance_alignment_audit"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 7, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 7, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "7 of 7 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 7}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A single artifact is split into a short surface and a long substance. The short surface is easier to see, cite, forward, rank, skim, or sell, while the long surface contains qualifications, evidence, scope limits, definitions, exceptions, and legal or technical commitments. Because the two surfaces may be authored, edited, optimized, updated, cached, and consumed differently, they drift apart. Downstream audiences then act on the summary as if it faithfully expressed the substance, even when the substance would support a narrower, weaker, different, or opposite claim.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A single artifact is split into a short surface and a long substance. The short surface is easier to see, cite, forward, rank, skim, or sell, while the long surface contains qualifications, evidence, scope limits, definitions, exceptions, and legal or technical commitments. Because the two surfaces may be authored, edited, optimized, updated, cached, and consumed differently, they drift apart. Downstream audiences then act on the summary as if it faithfully expressed the substance, even when the substance would support a narrower, weaker, different, or opposite claim."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The exact prime requires a high-impact summary surface and a more detailed substance surface.", "role_mapping": "Short artifact -> summary; detailed artifact -> substance.", "slug": "summary_substance_divergence", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b066_a05_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Headlines, abstracts, labels, notifications, executive summaries, teasers, social cards, decks, term sheets, and search snippets all qualify. In this condition set, the requirement is: The artifact has a materially influential short surface and a more detailed substance surface.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The artifact has a materially influential short surface and a more detailed substance surface."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Summary Substance Divergence", "one_liner": "An artefact's short summary surface and long substance surface, authored under different incentives and consumed by different audiences, drift apart into two truth-conditions.", "page_ref": "prime:summary_substance_divergence", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Short artifact -> summary; detailed artifact -> substance.", "slug": "summary_substance_divergence", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The exact prime requires a high-impact summary surface and a more detailed substance surface."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The artifact has a materially influential short surface and a more detailed substance surface.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Divergence matters because recipients often act on the summary without reading the substance.", "role_mapping": "Recipients -> summary consumers.", "slug": "summary_substance_divergence", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b066_a05_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The pattern becomes high-risk when downstream citation, action, ranking, or belief forms at summary level. In this condition set, the requirement is: Most or some important recipients will consume only the summary surface.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Most or some important recipients will consume only the summary surface."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Summary Substance Divergence", "one_liner": "An artefact's short summary surface and long substance surface, authored under different incentives and consumed by different audiences, drift apart into two truth-conditions.", "page_ref": "prime:summary_substance_divergence", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Recipients -> summary consumers.", "slug": "summary_substance_divergence", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Divergence matters because recipients often act on the summary without reading the substance."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Most or some important recipients will consume only the summary surface.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Different optimization incentives can pull summary claims away from detailed support.", "role_mapping": "Summary incentive -> surface optimization; substance incentive -> underlying record.", "slug": "summary_substance_divergence", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b066_a05_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Attention, marketing, legal compliance, scientific caution, operational detail, and political palatability can pull in different directions. In this condition set, the requirement is: The summary and substance are produced or optimized under different incentives.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The summary and substance are produced or optimized under different incentives."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Summary Substance Divergence", "one_liner": "An artefact's short summary surface and long substance surface, authored under different incentives and consumed by different audiences, drift apart into two truth-conditions.", "page_ref": "prime:summary_substance_divergence", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Summary incentive -> surface optimization; substance incentive -> underlying record.", "slug": "summary_substance_divergence", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Different optimization incentives can pull summary claims away from detailed support."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The summary and substance are produced or optimized under different incentives.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Selective compression and omitted qualifications are the mechanism of divergence.", "role_mapping": "Omitted caveat -> lost substance; framing -> summary claim.", "slug": "summary_substance_divergence", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b066_a05_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Not every omission is a failure; the trigger is omission that changes truth-conditions, actionability, risk, or warranted confidence. In this condition set, the requirement is: The summary selects, frames, compresses, or omits claims whose qualifications matter.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The summary selects, frames, compresses, or omits claims whose qualifications matter."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Summary Substance Divergence", "one_liner": "An artefact's short summary surface and long substance surface, authored under different incentives and consumed by different audiences, drift apart into two truth-conditions.", "page_ref": "prime:summary_substance_divergence", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Omitted caveat -> lost substance; framing -> summary claim.", "slug": "summary_substance_divergence", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Selective compression and omitted qualifications are the mechanism of divergence."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The summary selects, frames, compresses, or omits claims whose qualifications matter.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Unsynchronized update paths allow current substance and stale summary to disagree.", "role_mapping": "Substance update -> source change; summary -> stale derivative.", "slug": "summary_substance_divergence", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b066_a05_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A stale title, cached preview, old abstract, unchanged label, or inherited executive summary can preserve obsolete claims. In this condition set, the requirement is: Updates to the substance can occur without synchronized updates to the summary.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Updates to the substance can occur without synchronized updates to the summary."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Summary Substance Divergence", "one_liner": "An artefact's short summary surface and long substance surface, authored under different incentives and consumed by different audiences, drift apart into two truth-conditions.", "page_ref": "prime:summary_substance_divergence", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Substance update -> source change; summary -> stale derivative.", "slug": "summary_substance_divergence", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Unsynchronized update paths allow current substance and stale summary to disagree."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Updates to the substance can occur without synchronized updates to the summary.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Separate distribution and quotation let the short surface circulate independently.", "role_mapping": "Short surface -> derivative artifact; distribution -> independent reach.", "slug": "summary_substance_divergence", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b066_a05_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Decoupled circulation turns alignment into a governance problem, not merely a writing problem. In this condition set, the requirement is: The short surface is distributed, quoted, indexed, or archived separately from the substance.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The short surface is distributed, quoted, indexed, or archived separately from the substance."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Summary Substance Divergence", "one_liner": "An artefact's short summary surface and long substance surface, authored under different incentives and consumed by different audiences, drift apart into two truth-conditions.", "page_ref": "prime:summary_substance_divergence", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Short surface -> derivative artifact; distribution -> independent reach.", "slug": "summary_substance_divergence", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Separate distribution and quotation let the short surface circulate independently."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The short surface is distributed, quoted, indexed, or archived separately from the substance.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Weak traceability prevents audiences from checking summary wording against its support.", "role_mapping": "Summary wording -> claim; underlying support -> substance path.", "slug": "summary_substance_divergence", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b066_a05_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Traceability is needed because the summary may be plausible while materially unsupported. In this condition set, the requirement is: The audience cannot easily inspect the path from summary wording to the underlying support.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The audience cannot easily inspect the path from summary wording to the underlying support."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Summary Substance Divergence", "one_liner": "An artefact's short summary surface and long substance surface, authored under different incentives and consumed by different audiences, drift apart into two truth-conditions.", "page_ref": "prime:summary_substance_divergence", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Summary wording -> claim; underlying support -> substance path.", "slug": "summary_substance_divergence", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Weak traceability prevents audiences from checking summary wording against its support."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The audience cannot easily inspect the path from summary wording to the underlying support.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 66, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-066", "ledger_sha256": "2bf812b2dfb8ba2fd636e5e63308837186363ed0b4460c807b593e6b6506a264"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Summative Certification", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:summative_certification", "slug": "summative_certification"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 5, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Many systems need final decisions, but they often substitute rituals for valid certification. A learner receives a grade without a clear claim. A trainee receives a certificate for attendance. A project is accepted because the meeting went well. A candidate passes a test that mostly measured familiarity with the test format. The result is false confidence: stakeholders believe an outcome has been demonstrated, while the evidence actually supports a narrower or different claim.\n\nThe structural problem is evidence-to-claim drift. The system needs a status that others can rely on, but endpoint evidence is partial, fallible, and easy to overstate.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system needs a defensible judgment of achievement, readiness, completion, acceptance, or authorization, but the endpoint evidence is unclear, informal, misaligned, or overclaimed."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Certification occurs at a meaningful endpoint where competence, safety, or acceptance is judged.", "role_mapping": "Endpoint -> certification event.", "slug": "certification", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b066_a06_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It fits course completion, professional credentialing, onboarding readiness, safety checkouts, project acceptance, release approvals, and any context where other people will rely on the status claim. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A learning, training, onboarding, release, acceptance, credentialing, or safety process reaches a meaningful endpoint.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A learning, training, onboarding, release, acceptance, credentialing, or safety process reaches a meaningful endpoint.", "It fits course completion, professional credentialing, onboarding readiness, safety checkouts, project acceptance, release approvals, and any context where other people will rely on the status claim."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Certification", "one_liner": "A trusted third party attests, after a defined evaluation, that an entity meets a standard, and issues a portable token downstream parties use as a substitute for re-doing the evaluation.", "page_ref": "prime:certification", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Endpoint -> certification event.", "slug": "certification", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Certification occurs at a meaningful endpoint where competence, safety, or acceptance is judged."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A learning, training, onboarding, release, acceptance, credentialing, or safety process reaches a meaningful endpoint.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Certification necessarily claims that stated requirements have been met and licenses consequences.", "role_mapping": "Required outcomes -> criteria; consequences -> certified permission.", "slug": "certification", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b066_a06_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when the consequences of the judgment require clarity: who is ready, what has been achieved, what deliverable has been accepted, what authorization has been granted, and what the certification does not prove. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Stakeholders need to know whether required outcomes have been achieved and what consequences can follow.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders need to know whether required outcomes have been achieved and what consequences can follow.", "It is especially useful when the consequences of the judgment require clarity: who is ready, what has been achieved, what deliverable has been accepted, what authorization has been granted, and what the certification does not prove."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Certification", "one_liner": "A trusted third party attests, after a defined evaluation, that an entity meets a standard, and issues a portable token downstream parties use as a substitute for re-doing the evaluation.", "page_ref": "prime:certification", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Required outcomes -> criteria; consequences -> certified permission.", "slug": "certification", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Certification necessarily claims that stated requirements have been met and licenses consequences."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Stakeholders need to know whether required outcomes have been achieved and what consequences can follow.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The decision is used for authorization, progression, release, credentialing, or public trust.", "role_mapping": "Decision -> certificate; consequence -> authorized action.", "slug": "certification", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b066_a06_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It fits course completion, professional credentialing, onboarding readiness, safety checkouts, project acceptance, release approvals, and any context where other people will rely on the status claim. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A decision will be used for progression, certification, authorization, accountability, release, acceptance, reporting, or public trust.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A decision will be used for progression, certification, authorization, accountability, release, acceptance, reporting, or public trust.", "It fits course completion, professional credentialing, onboarding readiness, safety checkouts, project acceptance, release approvals, and any context where other people will rely on the status claim."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Certification", "one_liner": "A trusted third party attests, after a defined evaluation, that an entity meets a standard, and issues a portable token downstream parties use as a substitute for re-doing the evaluation.", "page_ref": "prime:certification", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Decision -> certificate; consequence -> authorized action.", "slug": "certification", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The decision is used for authorization, progression, release, credentialing, or public trust."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A decision will be used for progression, certification, authorization, accountability, release, acceptance, reporting, or public trust.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Summative assessment is distinguished from formative developmental feedback by its final evaluative role.", "role_mapping": "Developmental feedback -> formative; final judgment -> summative.", "slug": "summative_assessment", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b066_a06_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when a system needs a defensible endpoint judgment rather than another round of developmental feedback. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The system must distinguish developmental feedback from final outcome judgment.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The system must distinguish developmental feedback from final outcome judgment.", "Use this archetype when a system needs a defensible endpoint judgment rather than another round of developmental feedback."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Summative Assessment", "one_liner": "Final evaluation.", "page_ref": "prime:summative_assessment", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Developmental feedback -> formative; final judgment -> summative.", "slug": "summative_assessment", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Summative assessment is distinguished from formative developmental feedback by its final evaluative role."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The system must distinguish developmental feedback from final outcome judgment.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A summative claim requires explicit evidence that the assessed outcomes were achieved.", "role_mapping": "Achievement evidence -> assessment basis; claim -> final judgment.", "slug": "summative_assessment", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b066_a06_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The structural problem is evidence-to-claim drift. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Evidence of achievement exists or can be collected, but the evidence-to-claim relationship must be made explicit.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Evidence of achievement exists or can be collected, but the evidence-to-claim relationship must be made explicit.", "The structural problem is evidence-to-claim drift."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Summative Assessment", "one_liner": "Final evaluation.", "page_ref": "prime:summative_assessment", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Achievement evidence -> assessment basis; claim -> final judgment.", "slug": "summative_assessment", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A summative claim requires explicit evidence that the assessed outcomes were achieved."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Evidence of achievement exists or can be collected, but the evidence-to-claim relationship must be made explicit.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 66, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-066", "ledger_sha256": "2bf812b2dfb8ba2fd636e5e63308837186363ed0b4460c807b593e6b6506a264"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Supernormal Cue Guardrail Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:supernormal_cue_guardrail_design", "slug": "supernormal_cue_guardrail_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 6, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 6, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "6 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A response system evolved, learned, or was validated against ordinary cues, but an artificial or engineered referent exaggerates one or more cue dimensions beyond that range. Because the responder lacks a built-in ceiling for the exaggerated dimension, the artificial cue can trigger more attention, appetite, arousal, trust, fear, status seeking, reward pursuit, or compliance than the underlying value warrants.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A response system evolved, learned, or was validated against ordinary cues, but an artificial or engineered referent exaggerates one or more cue dimensions beyond that range. Because the responder lacks a built-in ceiling for the exaggerated dimension, the artificial cue can trigger more attention, appetite, arousal, trust, fear, status seeking, reward pursuit, or compliance than the underlying value warrants."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A supernormal stimulus exaggerates a naturally salient cue such as sweetness, urgency, reward, or threat.", "role_mapping": "Intensified cue -> supernormal stimulus; natural signal -> evolved cue.", "slug": "supernormal_stimulus", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b066_a07_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A cue imitates or intensifies a naturally meaningful signal such as novelty, sweetness, urgency, social proof, motion, scarcity, reward, threat, attractiveness, or progress. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A cue imitates or intensifies a naturally meaningful signal such as novelty, sweetness, urgency, social proof, motion, scarcity, reward, threat, attractiveness, or progress."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Supernormal Stimulus", "one_liner": "A response circuit calibrated only over a natural cue range, with no built-in ceiling, is hijacked by an engineered referent that exceeds that range and triggers disproportionate response.", "page_ref": "prime:supernormal_stimulus", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Intensified cue -> supernormal stimulus; natural signal -> evolved cue.", "slug": "supernormal_stimulus", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A supernormal stimulus exaggerates a naturally salient cue such as sweetness, urgency, reward, or threat."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A cue imitates or intensifies a naturally meaningful signal such as novelty, sweetness, urgency, social proof, motion, scarcity, reward, threat, attractiveness, or progress.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The response system was calibrated to a historically bounded cue range with richer context.", "role_mapping": "Prior environment -> calibration range; response circuit -> adapted mechanism.", "slug": "supernormal_stimulus", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b066_a07_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A response system evolved, learned, or was validated against ordinary cues, but an artificial or engineered referent exaggerates one or more cue dimensions beyond that range. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The response circuit was calibrated in an environment where the cue rarely exceeded a limited range or carried richer contextual information.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The response circuit was calibrated in an environment where the cue rarely exceeded a limited range or carried richer contextual information.", "A response system evolved, learned, or was validated against ordinary cues, but an artificial or engineered referent exaggerates one or more cue dimensions beyond that range."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Supernormal Stimulus", "one_liner": "A response circuit calibrated only over a natural cue range, with no built-in ceiling, is hijacked by an engineered referent that exceeds that range and triggers disproportionate response.", "page_ref": "prime:supernormal_stimulus", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Prior environment -> calibration range; response circuit -> adapted mechanism.", "slug": "supernormal_stimulus", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The response system was calibrated to a historically bounded cue range with richer context."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The response circuit was calibrated in an environment where the cue rarely exceeded a limited range or carried richer contextual information.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Artificial design can optimize cue intensity faster than biological or learned response adapts.", "role_mapping": "Designer optimization -> cue escalation; responder -> lagging adaptation.", "slug": "supernormal_stimulus", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b066_a07_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Because the responder lacks a built-in ceiling for the exaggerated dimension, the artificial cue can trigger more attention, appetite, arousal, trust, fear, status seeking, reward pursuit, or compliance than the underlying value warrants. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Designers, algorithms, competitors, or incentives can optimize the cue dimension faster than the responder can adapt.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Designers, algorithms, competitors, or incentives can optimize the cue dimension faster than the responder can adapt.", "Because the responder lacks a built-in ceiling for the exaggerated dimension, the artificial cue can trigger more attention, appetite, arousal, trust, fear, status seeking, reward pursuit, or compliance than the underlying value warrants."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Supernormal Stimulus", "one_liner": "A response circuit calibrated only over a natural cue range, with no built-in ceiling, is hijacked by an engineered referent that exceeds that range and triggers disproportionate response.", "page_ref": "prime:supernormal_stimulus", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Designer optimization -> cue escalation; responder -> lagging adaptation.", "slug": "supernormal_stimulus", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Artificial design can optimize cue intensity faster than biological or learned response adapts."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Designers, algorithms, competitors, or incentives can optimize the cue dimension faster than the responder can adapt.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The defining mismatch is increasing response after the cue no longer tracks benefit, truth, or safety.", "role_mapping": "Cue intensity -> response; usefulness -> saturated outcome.", "slug": "supernormal_stimulus", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b066_a07_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Response increases with cue intensity even after usefulness, truth, benefit, safety, or proportionality has stopped increasing. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Response increases with cue intensity even after usefulness, truth, benefit, safety, or proportionality has stopped increasing."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Supernormal Stimulus", "one_liner": "A response circuit calibrated only over a natural cue range, with no built-in ceiling, is hijacked by an engineered referent that exceeds that range and triggers disproportionate response.", "page_ref": "prime:supernormal_stimulus", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Cue intensity -> response; usefulness -> saturated outcome.", "slug": "supernormal_stimulus", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The defining mismatch is increasing response after the cue no longer tracks benefit, truth, or safety."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Response increases with cue intensity even after usefulness, truth, benefit, safety, or proportionality has stopped increasing.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Frictionless repetition and personalization can repeatedly trigger the response while bypassing recovery.", "role_mapping": "Repeated cue -> stimulation; recovery -> bypassed adaptation.", "slug": "supernormal_stimulus", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b066_a07_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The cue can be repeated, stacked, personalized, automated, or made frictionless so recovery and reflection are bypassed. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The cue can be repeated, stacked, personalized, automated, or made frictionless so recovery and reflection are bypassed."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Supernormal Stimulus", "one_liner": "A response circuit calibrated only over a natural cue range, with no built-in ceiling, is hijacked by an engineered referent that exceeds that range and triggers disproportionate response.", "page_ref": "prime:supernormal_stimulus", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Repeated cue -> stimulation; recovery -> bypassed adaptation.", "slug": "supernormal_stimulus", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Frictionless repetition and personalization can repeatedly trigger the response while bypassing recovery."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The cue can be repeated, stacked, personalized, automated, or made frictionless so recovery and reflection are bypassed.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Observed choice can overstate agency because the engineered cue reshapes the decision environment.", "role_mapping": "Preference metric -> elicited response; cue environment -> supernormal manipulation.", "slug": "supernormal_stimulus", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b066_a07_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A response system evolved, learned, or was validated against ordinary cues, but an artificial or engineered referent exaggerates one or more cue dimensions beyond that range. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Ordinary choice, consent, alerting, or preference metrics overstate agency because the cue itself has shaped the response environment.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Ordinary choice, consent, alerting, or preference metrics overstate agency because the cue itself has shaped the response environment.", "A response system evolved, learned, or was validated against ordinary cues, but an artificial or engineered referent exaggerates one or more cue dimensions beyond that range."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Supernormal Stimulus", "one_liner": "A response circuit calibrated only over a natural cue range, with no built-in ceiling, is hijacked by an engineered referent that exceeds that range and triggers disproportionate response.", "page_ref": "prime:supernormal_stimulus", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Preference metric -> elicited response; cue environment -> supernormal manipulation.", "slug": "supernormal_stimulus", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Observed choice can overstate agency because the engineered cue reshapes the decision environment."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Ordinary choice, consent, alerting, or preference metrics overstate agency because the cue itself has shaped the response environment.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Vulnerable states or groups face higher risk: children, fatigued users, novices, isolated people, high-stress operators, people under scarcity pressure, or systems running in degraded mode.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Vulnerable states or groups face higher risk: children, fatigued users, novices, isolated people, high-stress operators, people under scarcity pressure, or systems running in degraded mode. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Vulnerable states or groups face higher risk: children, fatigued users, novices, isolated people, high-stress operators, people under scarcity pressure, or systems running in degraded mode."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Vulnerable states or groups face higher risk: children, fatigued users, novices, isolated people, high-stress operators, people under scarcity pressure, or systems running in degraded mode."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 66, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-066", "ledger_sha256": "2bf812b2dfb8ba2fd636e5e63308837186363ed0b4460c807b593e6b6506a264"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Superposition Modeling and Interference Analysis", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:superposition_modeling_and_interference_analysis", "slug": "superposition_modeling_and_interference_analysis"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 7, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 7, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "7 of 8 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 8}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Complex systems are often difficult to solve directly. When their governing relations are linear, simpler solutions can be scaled and added, making a large problem tractable through basis expansion, mode analysis, or response addition. Yet the convenience of the rule encourages overextension. Analysts may add isolated responses without checking whether the combined input changes the system, use coefficients from one basis in another, omit phase, or treat an intensity measurement as though it were the underlying amplitude.\n\nThe same observable can arise from structurally different composites. Destructive interference may yield a local zero even though each constituent is nonzero. Different nonorthogonal decompositions may fit the same state. Limited measurement may remove phase information and make recovery nonunique. In quantum applications an incoherent ensemble and a coherent state can share some outcome statistics while differing in interference behavior. In classical applications time averaging can erase cross terms that matter at shorter scales.\n\nBoundary conditions create another failure surface. Two functions may solve the same differential equation separately but not share the boundary required by the combined problem. Constituent waves may use inconsistent reference frames or units. A local linear response may cease to hold beyond an amplitude, frequency, load, or environmental threshold. Without a governed record, teams interpret residuals as noise, infer missing constituents from cancellation, or report elegant superpositions beyond their validity range.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Multiple candidate states, waves, modes, vectors, signals, loads, or responses coexist or overlap, but the combined behavior cannot be inferred by inspecting each constituent alone. Teams may add incompatible quantities, ignore coefficient and phase relations, infer absence from destructive cancellation, treat intensity as amplitude, assume a basis is unique, or extend a local linear model into a nonlinear regime. In quantum contexts they may confuse state superposition with an ordinary classical mixture; in strategic contexts they may borrow the metaphor without the formal structure."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Superposition is valid only where the governing response is linear.", "role_mapping": "Declared domain -> linear regime; response -> linear operator.", "slug": "superposition", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b066_a08_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "When their governing relations are linear, simpler solutions can be scaled and added, making a large problem tractable through basis expansion, mode analysis, or response addition. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A governing equation or response is believed to be linear over a declared domain.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A governing equation or response is believed to be linear over a declared domain.", "When their governing relations are linear, simpler solutions can be scaled and added, making a large problem tractable through basis expansion, mode analysis, or response addition."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Superposition", "one_liner": "Multiple states coexist.", "page_ref": "prime:superposition", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Declared domain -> linear regime; response -> linear operator.", "slug": "superposition", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Superposition is valid only where the governing response is linear."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A governing equation or response is believed to be linear over a declared domain.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The principle represents a complex state as a sum of simpler constituent states or modes.", "role_mapping": "Constituents -> component solutions; complex state -> sum.", "slug": "superposition", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b066_a08_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Multiple candidate states, waves, modes, vectors, signals, loads, or responses coexist or overlap, but the combined behavior cannot be inferred by inspecting each constituent alone. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A complex state or signal can be represented using simpler constituent states or modes.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A complex state or signal can be represented using simpler constituent states or modes.", "Multiple candidate states, waves, modes, vectors, signals, loads, or responses coexist or overlap, but the combined behavior cannot be inferred by inspecting each constituent alone."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Superposition", "one_liner": "Multiple states coexist.", "page_ref": "prime:superposition", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Constituents -> component solutions; complex state -> sum.", "slug": "superposition", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The principle represents a complex state as a sum of simpler constituent states or modes."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A complex state or signal can be represented using simpler constituent states or modes.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Overlapping components add and can reinforce, cancel, or beat.", "role_mapping": "Waves -> components; observed magnitude -> sum and interference.", "slug": "superposition", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b066_a08_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Multiple candidate states, waves, modes, vectors, signals, loads, or responses coexist or overlap, but the combined behavior cannot be inferred by inspecting each constituent alone. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Overlapping waves or responses may reinforce, cancel, beat, or redistribute observed magnitude.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Overlapping waves or responses may reinforce, cancel, beat, or redistribute observed magnitude.", "Multiple candidate states, waves, modes, vectors, signals, loads, or responses coexist or overlap, but the combined behavior cannot be inferred by inspecting each constituent alone."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Superposition", "one_liner": "Multiple states coexist.", "page_ref": "prime:superposition", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Waves -> components; observed magnitude -> sum and interference.", "slug": "superposition", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Overlapping components add and can reinforce, cancel, or beat."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Overlapping waves or responses may reinforce, cancel, beat, or redistribute observed magnitude.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Basis expansions and projections operationalize superposition for analysis and reconstruction.", "role_mapping": "Basis modes -> constituents; projection -> coefficients.", "slug": "superposition", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b066_a08_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "When their governing relations are linear, simpler solutions can be scaled and added, making a large problem tractable through basis expansion, mode analysis, or response addition. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A basis expansion or projection is needed for analysis, reconstruction, or computation.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A basis expansion or projection is needed for analysis, reconstruction, or computation.", "When their governing relations are linear, simpler solutions can be scaled and added, making a large problem tractable through basis expansion, mode analysis, or response addition."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Superposition", "one_liner": "Multiple states coexist.", "page_ref": "prime:superposition", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Basis modes -> constituents; projection -> coefficients.", "slug": "superposition", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Basis expansions and projections operationalize superposition for analysis and reconstruction."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A basis expansion or projection is needed for analysis, reconstruction, or computation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Linear independence does not itself require a measured composite.", "slug": "linear_independence"}], "residual_id": "r:superposition_modeling_and_interference_analysis:b066_a08_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b066_a08_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use it when relative phase or sign determines whether components reinforce or cancel; when a composite must be decomposed into modes or source contributions; when a linearity assumption needs direct testing; when boundary conditions control which combinations remain valid; or when an apparent absence might be destructive interference. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A measured composite must be separated into identifiable constituent contributions.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A measured composite must be separated into identifiable constituent contributions.", "Use it when relative phase or sign determines whether components reinforce or cancel; when a composite must be decomposed into modes or source contributions; when a linearity assumption needs direct testing; when boundary conditions control which combinations remain valid; or when an apparent absence might be destructive interference."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Linear independence does not itself require a measured composite.", "slug": "linear_independence"}], "normalized_requirement": "A measured composite must be separated into identifiable constituent contributions.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A measured composite must be separated into identifiable constituent contributions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Boundary conditions restrict which linear combinations of component solutions are admissible.", "role_mapping": "Boundary conditions -> constraints; combinations -> candidate states.", "slug": "superposition", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b066_a08_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Boundary conditions create another failure surface. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Boundary conditions determine which linear combinations remain admissible.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Boundary conditions determine which linear combinations remain admissible.", "Boundary conditions create another failure surface."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Superposition", "one_liner": "Multiple states coexist.", "page_ref": "prime:superposition", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Boundary conditions -> constraints; combinations -> candidate states.", "slug": "superposition", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Boundary conditions restrict which linear combinations of component solutions are admissible."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Boundary conditions determine which linear combinations remain admissible.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Coherent linear addition must be distinguished from probabilistic mixture or portfolio aggregation.", "role_mapping": "State sum -> superposition; probability weights -> mixture.", "slug": "superposition", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b066_a08_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is also appropriate when deciding whether a statistical mixture, uncertain alternative set, or strategic option portfolio has been mislabeled as a coherent superposition. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A superposition claim must be distinguished from a probabilistic mixture or option portfolio.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A superposition claim must be distinguished from a probabilistic mixture or option portfolio.", "It is also appropriate when deciding whether a statistical mixture, uncertain alternative set, or strategic option portfolio has been mislabeled as a coherent superposition."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Superposition", "one_liner": "Multiple states coexist.", "page_ref": "prime:superposition", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "State sum -> superposition; probability weights -> mixture.", "slug": "superposition", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Coherent linear addition must be distinguished from probabilistic mixture or portfolio aggregation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A superposition claim must be distinguished from a probabilistic mixture or option portfolio.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Saturation or coupling marks the boundary where linear superposition ceases to hold.", "role_mapping": "Nonlinear onset -> validity limit.", "slug": "superposition", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b066_a08_c8", "explanation": {"paragraph": "If interactions change the parameters, generate new frequencies, saturate, couple modes, or otherwise violate additivity and homogeneity, use a nonlinear or coupled model after documenting the breakdown. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The onset of saturation, coupling, decoherence, or other nonlinear behavior must be located.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The onset of saturation, coupling, decoherence, or other nonlinear behavior must be located.", "If interactions change the parameters, generate new frequencies, saturate, couple modes, or otherwise violate additivity and homogeneity, use a nonlinear or coupled model after documenting the breakdown."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Superposition", "one_liner": "Multiple states coexist.", "page_ref": "prime:superposition", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Nonlinear onset -> validity limit.", "slug": "superposition", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Saturation or coupling marks the boundary where linear superposition ceases to hold."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The onset of saturation, coupling, decoherence, or other nonlinear behavior must be located.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [8], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 66, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-066", "ledger_sha256": "2bf812b2dfb8ba2fd636e5e63308837186363ed0b4460c807b593e6b6506a264"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Surprise Preparedness", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:surprise_preparedness", "slug": "surprise_preparedness"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system faces low-frequency but consequential disruptions whose exact form cannot be reliably enumerated. Existing plans are tied to named scenarios, centralized expertise, normal communications, just-in-time resources, or assumptions that may fail together.\n", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system faces low-frequency but consequential disruptions whose exact form cannot be reliably enumerated. Existing plans are tied to named scenarios, centralized expertise, normal communications, just-in-time resources, or assumptions that may fail together."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P102-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a critical-function role rather than an incidental activity.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A system has one or more critical functions whose continuation matters.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail functional dependency rather than mere association.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The critical functions depend on suppliers, roles, infrastructure, information channels, or equivalent support sources.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve concentration rather than a broadly diversified dependency base.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The dependency is concentrated in a small number of support sources or channels.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}], "predicate": "Critical functions depend on concentrated suppliers, roles, infrastructure, or information channels.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "critical functions depend on concentrated support channels", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P102-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A resilient system can retain concentration while protecting it robustly.", "slug": "resilience"}], "residual_id": "r:surprise_preparedness:b066_a09_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b066_a09_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Critical functions depend on concentrated suppliers, roles, infrastructure, or information channels. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Critical functions depend on concentrated suppliers, roles, infrastructure, or information channels."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "An excellent sole-source supplier is the record's own counterexample to a performance diagnosis, but it still satisfies every concentration-dependency obligation.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Supplier Concentration Risk", "one_liner": "Exposure that arises when a buyer's dependency for a critical input rests on so few suppliers that one node's disruption propagates downstream faster than alternatives can be qualified — a shape property of the dependency distribution, not of any supplier's performance.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:supplier_concentration_risk", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "supplier_concentration_risk"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "supplier_concentration_risk", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P102-C07-U1", "why_it_fits": "This is a domain-specific direct instance of critical functions depending on a concentrated support source."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Upstream automation may vary in reliability, but an instance cannot retain this DSA while adding another live final barrier: genuine supported redundancy is explicitly outside the exact record.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Operator-Vigilance Dependency", "one_liner": "Name the safety configuration in which a human operator's unaided sustained attention is the final live barrier against a severe hazard, under exactly the monotony and rarity that the vigilance literature says will degrade that attention — worsened, not helped, by more upstream automation.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:operator_vigilance_dependency", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "operator_vigilance_dependency"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "operator_vigilance_dependency", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P102-C07-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every exact operator-vigilance-dependency instance places a critical protective function on a concentrated support role, directly satisfying the source head."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Critical functions depend on concentrated suppliers, roles, infrastructure, or information channels.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Scenario plans can explicitly accommodate unknown or misclassified events.", "slug": "scenario_planning"}], "residual_id": "r:surprise_preparedness:b066_a09_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b066_a09_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Prepared plans assume the event category will be recognized early and correctly. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Prepared plans assume the event category will be recognized early and correctly."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Scenario plans can explicitly accommodate unknown or misclassified events.", "slug": "scenario_planning"}], "normalized_requirement": "Prepared plans assume the event category will be recognized early and correctly.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Prepared plans assume the event category will be recognized early and correctly.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P102-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a response function and a centralized decision-authority role.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Response authority is concentrated in a central actor or location.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must make centralization causal for operational failure rather than merely coincident with it.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The centralization prevents the response authority from operating adequately under the selected constraint.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires communication loss as the condition under which centralized response fails.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Communication with the central authority is lost.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires time pressure that makes recourse to centralized authority infeasible.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The response must operate under time pressure.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Response authority is too centralized to operate under communication loss or time pressure.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "centralized response authority cannot operate under communication loss or time pressure", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P102-C08-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Incident response can delegate local authority.", "slug": "incident_response"}], "residual_id": "r:surprise_preparedness:b066_a09_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b066_a09_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Existing plans are tied to named scenarios, centralized expertise, normal communications, just-in-time resources, or assumptions that may fail together. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Response authority is too centralized to operate under communication loss or time pressure.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Response authority is too centralized to operate under communication loss or time pressure.", "Existing plans are tied to named scenarios, centralized expertise, normal communications, just-in-time resources, or assumptions that may fail together."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Incident response can delegate local authority.", "slug": "incident_response"}], "normalized_requirement": "Response authority is too centralized to operate under communication loss or time pressure.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Response authority is too centralized to operate under communication loss or time pressure.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Optimization during stable periods removes slack, substitutes, and experimental capacity, inducing fragility to surprise.", "role_mapping": "Efficiency improvements -> stability adaptation; removed slack -> fragility.", "slug": "stability_induced_fragility", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b066_a09_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Efficiency improvements have removed slack, substitution paths, or safe experimentation capacity. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Efficiency improvements have removed slack, substitution paths, or safe experimentation capacity."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Stability-Induced Fragility", "one_liner": "Prolonged calm endogenously erodes the response capacity that stressors keep exercised.", "page_ref": "prime:stability_induced_fragility", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Efficiency improvements -> stability adaptation; removed slack -> fragility.", "slug": "stability_induced_fragility", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Optimization during stable periods removes slack, substitutes, and experimental capacity, inducing fragility to surprise."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Efficiency improvements have removed slack, substitution paths, or safe experimentation capacity.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P102-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve an exercise or rehearsal role and the capability being assessed.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A system conducts exercises intended to test response capability.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail recurrence of testing against familiar scenarios or procedures.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The exercises repeatedly rehearse known scripts.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the excluded model-failure regime rather than exercises that also test adaptation beyond the script.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The exercises do not test capability when the known script or governing model fails.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Exercises repeatedly test known scripts rather than capability under model failure.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "repeated exercises rehearse known scripts instead of model-failure capability", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P102-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Wargaming can deliberately test model failure.", "slug": "wargaming"}], "residual_id": "r:surprise_preparedness:b066_a09_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b066_a09_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Exercises repeatedly test known scripts rather than capability under model failure. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Exercises repeatedly test known scripts rather than capability under model failure."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Wargaming can deliberately test model failure.", "slug": "wargaming"}], "normalized_requirement": "Exercises repeatedly test known scripts rather than capability under model failure.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Exercises repeatedly test known scripts rather than capability under model failure.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Plausible consequences are high even though event probabilities are difficult to estimate.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Plausible consequences are high even though event probabilities are difficult to estimate. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Plausible consequences are high even though event probabilities are difficult to estimate."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Plausible consequences are high even though event probabilities are difficult to estimate."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 66, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-066", "ledger_sha256": "2bf812b2dfb8ba2fd636e5e63308837186363ed0b4460c807b593e6b6506a264"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Survival-Conditioned Persistence Forecasting", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:survival_conditioned_persistence_forecasting", "slug": "survival_conditioned_persistence_forecasting"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Decision-makers either ignore elapsed survival as evidence and repeatedly predict imminent disappearance of durable entities, or overgeneralize the Lindy slogan and treat age as proof of future persistence, quality, legitimacy, or safety. Both errors arise because the conditioning event, risk set, hazard shape, and future regime remain implicit.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Decision-makers either ignore elapsed survival as evidence and repeatedly predict imminent disappearance of durable entities, or overgeneralize the Lindy slogan and treat age as proof of future persistence, quality, legitimacy, or safety. Both errors arise because the conditioning event, risk set, hazard shape, and future regime remain implicit."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The Lindy effect forecasts remaining persistence of an existing nonperishable entity from survival so far.", "role_mapping": "Existing entity -> survivor; future lifetime -> forecast.", "slug": "lindy_effect", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b066_a10_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Decision-makers either ignore elapsed survival as evidence and repeatedly predict imminent disappearance of durable entities, or overgeneralize the Lindy slogan and treat age as proof of future persistence, quality, legitimacy, or safety. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A decision depends materially on how long an existing entity, lineage, practice, protocol, institution, or cultural artifact is likely to persist.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A decision depends materially on how long an existing entity, lineage, practice, protocol, institution, or cultural artifact is likely to persist.", "Decision-makers either ignore elapsed survival as evidence and repeatedly predict imminent disappearance of durable entities, or overgeneralize the Lindy slogan and treat age as proof of future persistence, quality, legitimacy, or safety."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Lindy Effect", "one_liner": "For entities that do not age, the longer they have already survived, the longer their expected remaining survival becomes.", "page_ref": "prime:lindy_effect", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Existing entity -> survivor; future lifetime -> forecast.", "slug": "lindy_effect", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The Lindy effect forecasts remaining persistence of an existing nonperishable entity from survival so far."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A decision depends materially on how long an existing entity, lineage, practice, protocol, institution, or cultural artifact is likely to persist.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The effect applies where hazard does not mechanically increase merely with elapsed age.", "role_mapping": "Non-aging subject -> Lindy candidate; time -> survival evidence.", "slug": "lindy_effect", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b066_a10_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The subject can plausibly be non-aging in the relevant sense: its exit hazard need not rise merely because time has passed. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The subject can plausibly be non-aging in the relevant sense: its exit hazard need not rise merely because time has passed."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Lindy Effect", "one_liner": "For entities that do not age, the longer they have already survived, the longer their expected remaining survival becomes.", "page_ref": "prime:lindy_effect", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Non-aging subject -> Lindy candidate; time -> survival evidence.", "slug": "lindy_effect", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The effect applies where hazard does not mechanically increase merely with elapsed age."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The subject can plausibly be non-aging in the relevant sense: its exit hazard need not rise merely because time has passed.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Substantial observed age relative to entry and failure cycles supplies the survival-conditioned evidence.", "role_mapping": "Observed age -> survived duration; reference cycle -> comparison.", "slug": "lindy_effect", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b066_a10_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Observed age is substantial relative to the relevant entry and failure cycles. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Observed age is substantial relative to the relevant entry and failure cycles."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Lindy Effect", "one_liner": "For entities that do not age, the longer they have already survived, the longer their expected remaining survival becomes.", "page_ref": "prime:lindy_effect", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Observed age -> survived duration; reference cycle -> comparison.", "slug": "lindy_effect", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Substantial observed age relative to entry and failure cycles supplies the survival-conditioned evidence."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Observed age is substantial relative to the relevant entry and failure cycles.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A reference class or structured scenario set can be constructed.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: A reference class or structured scenario set can be constructed. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A reference class or structured scenario set can be constructed."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "A reference class or structured scenario set can be constructed."}, {"display_text": "Migration, preservation, procurement, maintenance, compatibility, reform, or investment horizons are costly to choose incorrectly.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Migration, preservation, procurement, maintenance, compatibility, reform, or investment horizons are costly to choose incorrectly. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Migration, preservation, procurement, maintenance, compatibility, reform, or investment horizons are costly to choose incorrectly."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Migration, preservation, procurement, maintenance, compatibility, reform, or investment horizons are costly to choose incorrectly."}, {"display_text": "There is a risk of fashionable recency bias, imminent-disappearance narratives, or blind deference to longevity.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Decision-makers either ignore elapsed survival as evidence and repeatedly predict imminent disappearance of durable entities, or overgeneralize the Lindy slogan and treat age as proof of future persistence, quality, legitimacy, or safety. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: There is a risk of fashionable recency bias, imminent-disappearance narratives, or blind deference to longevity. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["There is a risk of fashionable recency bias, imminent-disappearance narratives, or blind deference to longevity.", "Decision-makers either ignore elapsed survival as evidence and repeatedly predict imminent disappearance of durable entities, or overgeneralize the Lindy slogan and treat age as proof of future persistence, quality, legitimacy, or safety."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "There is a risk of fashionable recency bias, imminent-disappearance narratives, or blind deference to longevity."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 66, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-066", "ledger_sha256": "2bf812b2dfb8ba2fd636e5e63308837186363ed0b4460c807b593e6b6506a264"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Sustainable Load Envelope Governance", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:sustainable_load_envelope_governance", "slug": "sustainable_load_envelope_governance"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 7, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 7, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "7 of 7 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 7}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system is governed by short-term throughput, utilization, or service targets even though its long-run capacity depends on a renewing substrate. Demand that looks operationally feasible begins consuming reserves, maintenance capacity, ecological stock, worker recovery, legitimacy, or infrastructure condition, lowering the system's future load-carrying ability.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system is governed by short-term throughput, utilization, or service targets even though its long-run capacity depends on a renewing substrate. Demand that looks operationally feasible begins consuming reserves, maintenance capacity, ecological stock, worker recovery, legitimacy, or infrastructure condition, lowering the system's future load-carrying ability."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Carrying capacity is set by a finite renewing substrate supporting recurring load.", "role_mapping": "Support substrate -> resource base; system load -> population or demand.", "slug": "carrying_capacity", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b066_a11_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system is governed by short-term throughput, utilization, or service targets even though its long-run capacity depends on a renewing substrate. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The system has a finite support substrate that renews, recovers, replenishes, or degrades over time.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The system has a finite support substrate that renews, recovers, replenishes, or degrades over time.", "A system is governed by short-term throughput, utilization, or service targets even though its long-run capacity depends on a renewing substrate."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Carrying Capacity", "one_liner": "The sustainable load envelope of a system: the maximum demand it can carry indefinitely before sustained operation begins consuming its own substrate and lowering future capacity.", "page_ref": "prime:carrying_capacity", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Support substrate -> resource base; system load -> population or demand.", "slug": "carrying_capacity", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Carrying capacity is set by a finite renewing substrate supporting recurring load."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The system has a finite support substrate that renews, recovers, replenishes, or degrades over time.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Sustainable recurring demand must be distinguished from transient peak load.", "role_mapping": "Recurring demand -> supported load; peak -> temporary excursion.", "slug": "carrying_capacity", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b066_a11_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Recurring demand can be measured or approximated separately from one-time peak demand. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Recurring demand can be measured or approximated separately from one-time peak demand."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Carrying Capacity", "one_liner": "The sustainable load envelope of a system: the maximum demand it can carry indefinitely before sustained operation begins consuming its own substrate and lowering future capacity.", "page_ref": "prime:carrying_capacity", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Recurring demand -> supported load; peak -> temporary excursion.", "slug": "carrying_capacity", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Sustainable recurring demand must be distinguished from transient peak load."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Recurring demand can be measured or approximated separately from one-time peak demand.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Short-term operation above carrying capacity is possible by depleting stock or maintenance capacity.", "role_mapping": "Overload -> demand above renewal; consumed stock -> borrowed support.", "slug": "carrying_capacity", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b066_a11_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Demand that looks operationally feasible begins consuming reserves, maintenance capacity, ecological stock, worker recovery, legitimacy, or infrastructure condition, lowering the system's future load-carrying ability. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Short-term operation can exceed sustainable levels by consuming stock, slack, redundancy, trust, or maintenance capacity.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Short-term operation can exceed sustainable levels by consuming stock, slack, redundancy, trust, or maintenance capacity.", "Demand that looks operationally feasible begins consuming reserves, maintenance capacity, ecological stock, worker recovery, legitimacy, or infrastructure condition, lowering the system's future load-carrying ability."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Carrying Capacity", "one_liner": "The sustainable load envelope of a system: the maximum demand it can carry indefinitely before sustained operation begins consuming its own substrate and lowering future capacity.", "page_ref": "prime:carrying_capacity", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Overload -> demand above renewal; consumed stock -> borrowed support.", "slug": "carrying_capacity", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Short-term operation above carrying capacity is possible by depleting stock or maintenance capacity."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Short-term operation can exceed sustainable levels by consuming stock, slack, redundancy, trust, or maintenance capacity.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Overload harm can lag while the support substrate is drawn down.", "role_mapping": "Delayed harm -> depletion signal; drawdown -> capacity erosion.", "slug": "carrying_capacity", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b066_a11_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The harm of overload appears with delay, hysteresis, or accumulated drawdown rather than immediate failure. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The harm of overload appears with delay, hysteresis, or accumulated drawdown rather than immediate failure."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Carrying Capacity", "one_liner": "The sustainable load envelope of a system: the maximum demand it can carry indefinitely before sustained operation begins consuming its own substrate and lowering future capacity.", "page_ref": "prime:carrying_capacity", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Delayed harm -> depletion signal; drawdown -> capacity erosion.", "slug": "carrying_capacity", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Overload harm can lag while the support substrate is drawn down."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The harm of overload appears with delay, hysteresis, or accumulated drawdown rather than immediate failure.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Capacity becomes unsustainable when regeneration or repair is slower than demand growth.", "role_mapping": "Recovery cadence -> renewal; demand cadence -> load.", "slug": "carrying_capacity", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b066_a11_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Demand that looks operationally feasible begins consuming reserves, maintenance capacity, ecological stock, worker recovery, legitimacy, or infrastructure condition, lowering the system's future load-carrying ability. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Regeneration, repair, staffing, funding, or ecological recovery has a slower cadence than demand growth.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Regeneration, repair, staffing, funding, or ecological recovery has a slower cadence than demand growth.", "Demand that looks operationally feasible begins consuming reserves, maintenance capacity, ecological stock, worker recovery, legitimacy, or infrastructure condition, lowering the system's future load-carrying ability."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Carrying Capacity", "one_liner": "The sustainable load envelope of a system: the maximum demand it can carry indefinitely before sustained operation begins consuming its own substrate and lowering future capacity.", "page_ref": "prime:carrying_capacity", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Recovery cadence -> renewal; demand cadence -> load.", "slug": "carrying_capacity", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Capacity becomes unsustainable when regeneration or repair is slower than demand growth."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Regeneration, repair, staffing, funding, or ecological recovery has a slower cadence than demand growth.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Reserve borrowing can mask that carrying capacity has been exceeded.", "role_mapping": "Reserve -> temporary buffer; threshold breach -> overload.", "slug": "carrying_capacity", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b066_a11_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A threshold breach can be masked by borrowing from reserves or by shifting burden to invisible actors or ecosystems. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A threshold breach can be masked by borrowing from reserves or by shifting burden to invisible actors or ecosystems."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Carrying Capacity", "one_liner": "The sustainable load envelope of a system: the maximum demand it can carry indefinitely before sustained operation begins consuming its own substrate and lowering future capacity.", "page_ref": "prime:carrying_capacity", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Reserve -> temporary buffer; threshold breach -> overload.", "slug": "carrying_capacity", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Reserve borrowing can mask that carrying capacity has been exceeded."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A threshold breach can be masked by borrowing from reserves or by shifting burden to invisible actors or ecosystems.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Ecological or operational restoration after overshoot is costlier than remaining within capacity.", "role_mapping": "Overuse -> overshoot; restoration -> recovery cost.", "slug": "carrying_capacity", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b066_a11_c8", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Restoration after overuse is costlier than staying within the sustainable envelope. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Restoration after overuse is costlier than staying within the sustainable envelope."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Carrying Capacity", "one_liner": "The sustainable load envelope of a system: the maximum demand it can carry indefinitely before sustained operation begins consuming its own substrate and lowering future capacity.", "page_ref": "prime:carrying_capacity", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Overuse -> overshoot; restoration -> recovery cost.", "slug": "carrying_capacity", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Ecological or operational restoration after overshoot is costlier than remaining within capacity."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Restoration after overuse is costlier than staying within the sustainable envelope.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [8], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Decision makers are rewarded for current output more than future capacity preservation.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The system can convert future capacity into current output. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Decision makers are rewarded for current output more than future capacity preservation. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Decision makers are rewarded for current output more than future capacity preservation.", "The system can convert future capacity into current output."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Decision makers are rewarded for current output more than future capacity preservation."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 66, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-066", "ledger_sha256": "2bf812b2dfb8ba2fd636e5e63308837186363ed0b4460c807b593e6b6506a264"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Sustainment-Reach Alignment", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:sustainment_reach_alignment", "slug": "sustainment_reach_alignment"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 5, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "An operating front expands faster than the trailing support system can sustain it, and the growing support line consumes increasing fractions of the very capacity it is supposed to deliver.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "An operating front expands faster than the trailing support system can sustain it, and the growing support line consumes increasing fractions of the very capacity it is supposed to deliver."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Operational overextension begins when deployment or coverage is pushed outward from a sustaining base.", "role_mapping": "Central base -> support origin; expansion -> operational reach.", "slug": "operational_overextension", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b066_a12_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Expansion, deployment, market entry, service coverage, or field operations are being pushed outward from a central base. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Expansion, deployment, market entry, service coverage, or field operations are being pushed outward from a central base."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Operational Overextension", "one_liner": "A system advances a frontier of activity faster than the supporting backbone that sustains it can keep up, so the leading edge becomes brittle and fails on its next shock — the failure lying in the frontier-to-backbone ratio, not the frontier itself.", "page_ref": "prime:operational_overextension", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Central base -> support origin; expansion -> operational reach.", "slug": "operational_overextension", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Operational overextension begins when deployment or coverage is pushed outward from a sustaining base."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Expansion, deployment, market entry, service coverage, or field operations are being pushed outward from a central base.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Coordination, maintenance, lead time, and transport burden necessarily rise with extended reach.", "role_mapping": "Reach -> distance and handoffs; burden -> sustainment cost.", "slug": "operational_overextension", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b066_a12_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Reach creates opportunity only if sustainment scales with it; otherwise each increment of reach adds support cost, delay, and fragility that can consume the value of the advance. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Lead time, handoff count, coordination load, maintenance burden, or transport/support cost grows with reach.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Lead time, handoff count, coordination load, maintenance burden, or transport/support cost grows with reach.", "Reach creates opportunity only if sustainment scales with it; otherwise each increment of reach adds support cost, delay, and fragility that can consume the value of the advance."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Operational Overextension", "one_liner": "A system advances a frontier of activity faster than the supporting backbone that sustains it can keep up, so the leading edge becomes brittle and fails on its next shock — the failure lying in the frontier-to-backbone ratio, not the frontier itself.", "page_ref": "prime:operational_overextension", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Reach -> distance and handoffs; burden -> sustainment cost.", "slug": "operational_overextension", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Coordination, maintenance, lead time, and transport burden necessarily rise with extended reach."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Lead time, handoff count, coordination load, maintenance burden, or transport/support cost grows with reach.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Logistics overreach occurs when commitments use gross capacity rather than support actually deliverable at the front.", "role_mapping": "Gross capacity -> nominal supply; net support -> delivered logistics.", "slug": "logistics_overreach", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b066_a12_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "An operating front expands faster than the trailing support system can sustain it, and the growing support line consumes increasing fractions of the very capacity it is supposed to deliver. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Front-line commitments are made from gross capacity assumptions rather than net delivered support.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Front-line commitments are made from gross capacity assumptions rather than net delivered support.", "An operating front expands faster than the trailing support system can sustain it, and the growing support line consumes increasing fractions of the very capacity it is supposed to deliver."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Logistics Overreach", "one_liner": "An operating front advances faster than the trailing supply line that sustains it, and because the lengthening line itself consumes delivery, beyond a crossover point further advance strands what has already advanced rather than extending reach.", "page_ref": "prime:logistics_overreach", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Gross capacity -> nominal supply; net support -> delivered logistics.", "slug": "logistics_overreach", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Logistics overreach occurs when commitments use gross capacity rather than support actually deliverable at the front."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Front-line commitments are made from gross capacity assumptions rather than net delivered support.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Thin local repair, replacement, authority, and sourcing capacity make an extended operation dependent on the remote base.", "role_mapping": "Local buffer -> field sustainment; absence -> overextension.", "slug": "operational_overextension", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b066_a12_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Local buffers, repair, replacement, authority, or sourcing capacity are thin or absent. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Local buffers, repair, replacement, authority, or sourcing capacity are thin or absent."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Operational Overextension", "one_liner": "A system advances a frontier of activity faster than the supporting backbone that sustains it can keep up, so the leading edge becomes brittle and fails on its next shock — the failure lying in the frontier-to-backbone ratio, not the frontier itself.", "page_ref": "prime:operational_overextension", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Local buffer -> field sustainment; absence -> overextension.", "slug": "operational_overextension", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Thin local repair, replacement, authority, and sourcing capacity make an extended operation dependent on the remote base."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Local buffers, repair, replacement, authority, or sourcing capacity are thin or absent.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Lagging support-line signals allow advance decisions to outrun logistics reality.", "role_mapping": "Support signal -> logistics feedback; advance -> commitment.", "slug": "logistics_overreach", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b066_a12_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "An operating front expands faster than the trailing support system can sustain it, and the growing support line consumes increasing fractions of the very capacity it is supposed to deliver. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Signals from the support line lag behind decisions to advance.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Signals from the support line lag behind decisions to advance.", "An operating front expands faster than the trailing support system can sustain it, and the growing support line consumes increasing fractions of the very capacity it is supposed to deliver."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Logistics Overreach", "one_liner": "An operating front advances faster than the trailing supply line that sustains it, and because the lengthening line itself consumes delivery, beyond a crossover point further advance strands what has already advanced rather than extending reach.", "page_ref": "prime:logistics_overreach", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Support signal -> logistics feedback; advance -> commitment.", "slug": "logistics_overreach", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Lagging support-line signals allow advance decisions to outrun logistics reality."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Signals from the support line lag behind decisions to advance.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 66, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-066", "ledger_sha256": "2bf812b2dfb8ba2fd636e5e63308837186363ed0b4460c807b593e6b6506a264"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Symbiotic Alignment", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:symbiotic_alignment", "slug": "symbiotic_alignment"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is unmanaged interdependence. Two or more parties rely on each other, but the relationship does not yet protect the conditions that make continued mutual contribution possible.\n\nThis often appears as an extractive supplier relationship, a platform that drains complementors, a public-private partnership where public accountability and private incentives diverge, a mentorship relation where one party gives without replenishment, or an ecological intervention that treats a living system as a one-way input. The parties may call the arrangement a partnership, but the flows of benefit, risk, information, and obligation do not yet support reciprocal viability.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Two or more parties, components, or subsystems are interdependent, but the relationship is extractive, fragile, imbalanced, opaque, or underdeveloped, so one side can prosper by weakening the other or neglecting the conditions that sustain both."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Symbiosis necessarily links distinct actors in reciprocal ecological or functional dependence.", "role_mapping": "Partners -> symbionts; reciprocal dependence -> relation.", "slug": "symbiosis", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b066_a13_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Reciprocal dependence exists but is not explicitly mapped. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Reciprocal dependence exists but is not explicitly mapped."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Symbiosis", "one_liner": "Mutual interdependence.", "page_ref": "prime:symbiosis", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Partners -> symbionts; reciprocal dependence -> relation.", "slug": "symbiosis", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Symbiosis necessarily links distinct actors in reciprocal ecological or functional dependence."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Reciprocal dependence exists but is not explicitly mapped.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A symbiotic relation can already align local and joint incentives.", "slug": "symbiosis"}], "residual_id": "r:symbiotic_alignment:b066_a13_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b066_a13_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when there is a partnership, ecosystem, alliance, service network, supply relation, mentorship exchange, or ecological pairing where one side can appear successful in the short term while weakening the other side in the long term. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A partnership or ecosystem underperforms because local optimization weakens shared viability.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A partnership or ecosystem underperforms because local optimization weakens shared viability.", "It is especially useful when there is a partnership, ecosystem, alliance, service network, supply relation, mentorship exchange, or ecological pairing where one side can appear successful in the short term while weakening the other side in the long term."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A symbiotic relation can already align local and joint incentives.", "slug": "symbiosis"}], "normalized_requirement": "A partnership or ecosystem underperforms because local optimization weakens shared viability.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A partnership or ecosystem underperforms because local optimization weakens shared viability.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A symbiotic relation necessarily contains complementary contributions capable of mutual benefit or support.", "role_mapping": "Latent complementarity -> reciprocal functions; mutual reinforcement -> symbiosis.", "slug": "symbiosis", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b066_a13_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The relation has latent complementarity that could be converted into mutual reinforcement. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The relation has latent complementarity that could be converted into mutual reinforcement."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Symbiosis", "one_liner": "Mutual interdependence.", "page_ref": "prime:symbiosis", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Latent complementarity -> reciprocal functions; mutual reinforcement -> symbiosis.", "slug": "symbiosis", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A symbiotic relation necessarily contains complementary contributions capable of mutual benefit or support."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The relation has latent complementarity that could be converted into mutual reinforcement.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Benefits and obligations flow asymmetrically.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The parties may call the arrangement a partnership, but the flows of benefit, risk, information, and obligation do not yet support reciprocal viability. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Benefits and obligations flow asymmetrically. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Benefits and obligations flow asymmetrically.", "The parties may call the arrangement a partnership, but the flows of benefit, risk, information, and obligation do not yet support reciprocal viability."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "Benefits and obligations flow asymmetrically."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 66, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-066", "ledger_sha256": "2bf812b2dfb8ba2fd636e5e63308837186363ed0b4460c807b593e6b6506a264"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Symbol-System Coherence in Visual Art", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:symbol_system_coherence_visual_art", "slug": "symbol_system_coherence_visual_art"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A visual artwork, series, exhibition, brand system, or symbolic design uses recurring images, motifs, colors, textures, shapes, figures, or spatial cues, but their meanings are unstated, unstable, conflicting, or context-insensitive, so viewers cannot reliably infer the intended metaphorical interpretation.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A visual artwork, series, exhibition, brand system, or symbolic design uses recurring images, motifs, colors, textures, shapes, figures, or spatial cues, but their meanings are unstated, unstable, conflicting, or context-insensitive, so viewers cannot reliably infer the intended metaphorical interpretation."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Iconography is the recurring system of symbols, motifs, icons, and coded visual meanings in a body of work.", "role_mapping": "Visual work -> corpus; recurring cues -> iconographic system.", "slug": "iconography", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b066_a14_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A visual artwork, series, exhibition, brand system, or symbolic design uses recurring images, motifs, colors, textures, shapes, figures, or spatial cues, but their meanings are unstated, unstable, conflicting, or context-insensitive, so viewers cannot reliably infer the intended metaphorical interpretation. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A body of visual work relies on recurring symbols, motifs, icons, color codes, or metaphors.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A body of visual work relies on recurring symbols, motifs, icons, color codes, or metaphors.", "A visual artwork, series, exhibition, brand system, or symbolic design uses recurring images, motifs, colors, textures, shapes, figures, or spatial cues, but their meanings are unstated, unstable, conflicting, or context-insensitive, so viewers cannot reliably infer the intended metaphorical interpretation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Iconography", "one_liner": "Symbol systems in art.", "page_ref": "prime:iconography", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Visual work -> corpus; recurring cues -> iconographic system.", "slug": "iconography", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Iconography is the recurring system of symbols, motifs, icons, and coded visual meanings in a body of work."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A body of visual work relies on recurring symbols, motifs, icons, color codes, or metaphors.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "An iconographic program sustains symbol meaning across multiple images, panels, rooms, or artifacts.", "role_mapping": "Artifacts -> works; sustained meaning -> iconographic convention.", "slug": "iconography", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b066_a14_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Meaning must be sustained across multiple images, panels, rooms, screens, products, scenes, or artifacts. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Meaning must be sustained across multiple images, panels, rooms, screens, products, scenes, or artifacts."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Iconography", "one_liner": "Symbol systems in art.", "page_ref": "prime:iconography", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Artifacts -> works; sustained meaning -> iconographic convention.", "slug": "iconography", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "An iconographic program sustains symbol meaning across multiple images, panels, rooms, or artifacts."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Meaning must be sustained across multiple images, panels, rooms, screens, products, scenes, or artifacts.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Iconography allows audiences to infer identities, values, histories, and abstract ideas from visual cues.", "role_mapping": "Visual cue -> iconographic sign; inferred idea -> conventional meaning.", "slug": "iconography", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b066_a14_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A visual artwork, series, exhibition, brand system, or symbolic design uses recurring images, motifs, colors, textures, shapes, figures, or spatial cues, but their meanings are unstated, unstable, conflicting, or context-insensitive, so viewers cannot reliably infer the intended metaphorical interpretation. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The audience needs to infer relationships, values, emotions, identities, histories, or abstract ideas from visual cues.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The audience needs to infer relationships, values, emotions, identities, histories, or abstract ideas from visual cues.", "A visual artwork, series, exhibition, brand system, or symbolic design uses recurring images, motifs, colors, textures, shapes, figures, or spatial cues, but their meanings are unstated, unstable, conflicting, or context-insensitive, so viewers cannot reliably infer the intended metaphorical interpretation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Iconography", "one_liner": "Symbol systems in art.", "page_ref": "prime:iconography", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Visual cue -> iconographic sign; inferred idea -> conventional meaning.", "slug": "iconography", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Iconography allows audiences to infer identities, values, histories, and abstract ideas from visual cues."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The audience needs to infer relationships, values, emotions, identities, histories, or abstract ideas from visual cues.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P102-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve one symbol and an inherited association, not a newly invented symbol with no prior meaning.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A symbol carries a prior association from an earlier context.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve origin-to-reuse direction across contexts.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The symbol is reused later in a new context.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve possible incompatibility rather than guaranteed compatibility.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The prior association may conflict with expectations in the new context.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a cultural expectation in the receiving context.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The possible conflict is with cultural expectations.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a genre convention in the receiving context.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The possible conflict is with genre expectations.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires expectations held by the receiving audience.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The possible conflict is with audience expectations.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A symbol is reused in a new context where its prior association may collide with cultural, genre, or audience expectations.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "reused symbol's prior association may conflict with new-context expectations", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P102-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A reused iconographic symbol can remain fully compatible with its new context.", "slug": "iconography"}], "residual_id": "r:symbol_system_coherence_visual_art:b066_a14_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b066_a14_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A symbol is reused in a new context where its prior association may collide with cultural, genre, or audience expectations. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A symbol is reused in a new context where its prior association may collide with cultural, genre, or audience expectations."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "With the exact DSA and bridge fixed, the label is a reused conventional symbol decoded through a prior that conflicts with the designer’s intended reading; cultural and genre branches may fail without affecting the selected audience branch.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_BRIDGE", "name": "Microcopy Ambiguity", "one_liner": "The HCI failure where a terse interface label admits more than one reading, so the user decompresses it against a prior different from the designer's and acts correctly on the wrong interpretation.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:microcopy_ambiguity", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1", "O2"], "guard_type": "RELATION_SUBSUMPTION", "kind": "INTERPRETIVE_BRIDGE", "normalized_key": "label_prior_is_symbol_reuse", "predicate": "An interface label is a symbol, and decoding it against an already-held user prior is reuse of that symbol in the later interface context.", "rationale": "The bridge is generally true: interface labels are conventional symbols, and an already-held decoding prior necessarily predates reuse in the current interface context."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "microcopy_ambiguity"}, {"kind": "INTERPRETIVE_BRIDGE", "value": "An interface label is a symbol, and decoding it against an already-held user prior is reuse of that symbol in the later interface context."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "microcopy_ambiguity", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P102-C10-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact record directly supplies audience-prior conflict. One general relation bridge maps conventional label decoding to cross-context symbol reuse, completing the audience-expectation DNF branch."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A symbol is reused in a new context where its prior association may collide with cultural, genre, or audience expectations.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Multiple collaborators or iterations risk changing symbol use without noticing the semantic effect.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Multiple collaborators or iterations risk changing symbol use without noticing the semantic effect. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Multiple collaborators or iterations risk changing symbol use without noticing the semantic effect."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Multiple collaborators or iterations risk changing symbol use without noticing the semantic effect."}, {"display_text": "The work intentionally uses ambiguity, irony, transformation, or layered meaning and needs to separate productive ambiguity from accidental contradiction.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Artistic richness often depends on ambiguity, layering, and transformation, but interpretation also needs enough stable mapping to distinguish intentional complexity from accidental inconsistency. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: The work intentionally uses ambiguity, irony, transformation, or layered meaning and needs to separate productive ambiguity from accidental contradiction. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The work intentionally uses ambiguity, irony, transformation, or layered meaning and needs to separate productive ambiguity from accidental contradiction.", "Artistic richness often depends on ambiguity, layering, and transformation, but interpretation also needs enough stable mapping to distinguish intentional complexity from accidental inconsistency."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The work intentionally uses ambiguity, irony, transformation, or layered meaning and needs to separate productive ambiguity from accidental contradiction."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 66, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-066", "ledger_sha256": "2bf812b2dfb8ba2fd636e5e63308837186363ed0b4460c807b593e6b6506a264"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Symbolic Boundary Reframing", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:symbolic_boundary_reframing", "slug": "symbolic_boundary_reframing"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is not simply that a boundary exists. Boundaries help systems coordinate membership, standards, identity, expertise, safety, and responsibility. The problem appears when a symbolic boundary overreaches: it misclassifies, stigmatizes, ranks, erases, or excludes in ways that no longer match the system's purpose.\n\nThe difficult part is that symbolic boundaries often look natural. A title seems descriptive, a ritual seems traditional, a credential seems neutral, or a label seems administratively convenient. The archetype asks what the boundary does socially: who becomes central, who becomes marginal, who is trusted, who is watched, who is eligible, and who is treated as not really belonging.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A symbolic boundary separates people, roles, practices, identities, artifacts, or categories in ways that shape belonging, status, legitimacy, or access. The boundary may have once served a useful coordinating function, but in the current context it excludes, stigmatizes, misclassifies, naturalizes hierarchy, blocks contribution, or sends the wrong signal about what counts."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Symbolic boundaries classify people as inside or outside through labels, rituals, credentials, or symbols.", "role_mapping": "Label or ritual -> boundary marker; people -> classified members.", "slug": "symbolic_boundaries", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b066_a15_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when a label, category, title, ritual, credential, icon, spatial cue, or membership rule has become a social boundary with real effects. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A label, category, ritual, credential, or symbol determines who is treated as inside or outside.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A label, category, ritual, credential, or symbol determines who is treated as inside or outside.", "Use this archetype when a label, category, title, ritual, credential, icon, spatial cue, or membership rule has become a social boundary with real effects."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Symbolic Boundaries", "one_liner": "Group distinctions.", "page_ref": "prime:symbolic_boundaries", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Label or ritual -> boundary marker; people -> classified members.", "slug": "symbolic_boundaries", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Symbolic boundaries classify people as inside or outside through labels, rituals, credentials, or symbols."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A label, category, ritual, credential, or symbol determines who is treated as inside or outside.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Such boundaries necessarily carry status, stigma, or identity meaning beyond a neutral administrative line.", "role_mapping": "Status or stigma -> symbolic consequence.", "slug": "symbolic_boundaries", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b066_a15_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It also applies when a boundary remains useful but needs a better interpretation for edge cases, status effects, or changed context. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A boundary carries status or stigma beyond its stated administrative function.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A boundary carries status or stigma beyond its stated administrative function.", "It also applies when a boundary remains useful but needs a better interpretation for edge cases, status effects, or changed context."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Symbolic Boundaries", "one_liner": "Group distinctions.", "page_ref": "prime:symbolic_boundaries", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Status or stigma -> symbolic consequence.", "slug": "symbolic_boundaries", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Such boundaries necessarily carry status, stigma, or identity meaning beyond a neutral administrative line."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A boundary carries status or stigma beyond its stated administrative function.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P102-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a two-way classification scheme and its inherited status.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A binary classification inherited from an earlier context is applied to current cases.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve cases not cleanly represented by either inherited side.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Some current cases occupy edge or boundary positions relative to the binary.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail recurring classification error caused by the binary rather than one accidental mistake.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The inherited binary misclassifies the edge cases repeatedly.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}], "predicate": "An inherited binary repeatedly misclassifies edge cases.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "inherited binary repeatedly misclassifies edge cases", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P102-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A segmentation can classify all cases accurately.", "slug": "segmentation_and_boundary_drawing"}], "residual_id": "r:symbolic_boundary_reframing:b066_a15_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b066_a15_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It also applies when a boundary remains useful but needs a better interpretation for edge cases, status effects, or changed context. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Edge cases are repeatedly misclassified by an inherited binary.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Edge cases are repeatedly misclassified by an inherited binary.", "It also applies when a boundary remains useful but needs a better interpretation for edge cases, status effects, or changed context."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A segmentation can classify all cases accurately.", "slug": "segmentation_and_boundary_drawing"}], "normalized_requirement": "Edge cases are repeatedly misclassified by an inherited binary.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Edge cases are repeatedly misclassified by an inherited binary.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Symbolic boundaries are socially contested as legitimate, fair, current, or purpose-aligned.", "role_mapping": "Contestants -> groups; distinction -> boundary.", "slug": "symbolic_boundaries", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b066_a15_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: People contest whether a distinction is legitimate, fair, current, or aligned with purpose. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["People contest whether a distinction is legitimate, fair, current, or aligned with purpose."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Symbolic Boundaries", "one_liner": "Group distinctions.", "page_ref": "prime:symbolic_boundaries", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Contestants -> groups; distinction -> boundary.", "slug": "symbolic_boundaries", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Symbolic boundaries are socially contested as legitimate, fair, current, or purpose-aligned."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "People contest whether a distinction is legitimate, fair, current, or aligned with purpose.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A formally neutral category can structure unequal participation and recognition.", "role_mapping": "Neutral label -> boundary; unequal effect -> symbolic hierarchy.", "slug": "symbolic_boundaries", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b066_a15_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when a label, category, title, ritual, credential, icon, spatial cue, or membership rule has become a social boundary with real effects. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A category appears neutral but produces unequal participation or recognition effects.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A category appears neutral but produces unequal participation or recognition effects.", "Use this archetype when a label, category, title, ritual, credential, icon, spatial cue, or membership rule has become a social boundary with real effects."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Symbolic Boundaries", "one_liner": "Group distinctions.", "page_ref": "prime:symbolic_boundaries", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Neutral label -> boundary; unequal effect -> symbolic hierarchy.", "slug": "symbolic_boundaries", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A formally neutral category can structure unequal participation and recognition."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A category appears neutral but produces unequal participation or recognition effects.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A group wants to change belonging or recognition without pretending differences disappear.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: A group wants to change belonging or recognition without pretending differences disappear. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A group wants to change belonging or recognition without pretending differences disappear."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "A group wants to change belonging or recognition without pretending differences disappear."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 66, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-066", "ledger_sha256": "2bf812b2dfb8ba2fd636e5e63308837186363ed0b4460c807b593e6b6506a264"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Symbolic Convention Governance", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:symbolic_convention_governance", "slug": "symbolic_convention_governance"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 0, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 0 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 0 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 0}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is that arbitrary symbolic meaning is fragile. If a sign does not resemble its referent or directly indicate its cause, people need a shared convention to interpret it. Without governance, the convention becomes local, tacit, stale, or contested.\n\nThis creates several recurring breakdowns. Insiders understand the convention while newcomers guess. One team uses a term for a workflow state while another uses it for a legal status. Old codes remain in records after the meaning has changed. A style guide exists, but no one owns updates. A naming rule is enforced by habit until the original experts leave. In each case, the symbol still exists, but the shared agreement that makes it meaningful has weakened.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A community relies on symbols, names, terms, codes, labels, or formats whose meanings are arbitrary and therefore depend on shared agreement, but the agreement is undocumented, inconsistently adopted, drifting, locally divergent, or hard to revise."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [], "condition_structure": "DISJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Arbitrary sign-meaning relation.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The structural problem is that arbitrary symbolic meaning is fragile. In this archetype, the relevant source condition requiring clarification is: Arbitrary sign-meaning relation. The wording is retained for source review rather than assigned a stronger semantic role.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Arbitrary sign-meaning relation", "The structural problem is that arbitrary symbolic meaning is fragile."]}, "function": "MALFORMED", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because the source wording is not structurally clear enough to support a formal trigger role without clarification.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "Arbitrary sign-meaning relation"}, {"display_text": "Cross-context use.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this source condition requiring clarification: Cross-context use. The wording is retained for source review rather than assigned a stronger semantic role.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Cross-context use"]}, "function": "MALFORMED", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because the source wording is not structurally clear enough to support a formal trigger role without clarification.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "Cross-context use"}, {"display_text": "Interpretation cost or risk.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this source condition requiring clarification: Interpretation cost or risk. The wording is retained for source review rather than assigned a stronger semantic role.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Interpretation cost or risk"]}, "function": "MALFORMED", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because the source wording is not structurally clear enough to support a formal trigger role without clarification.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Interpretation cost or risk"}, {"display_text": "Informal convention growth.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this source condition requiring clarification: Informal convention growth. The wording is retained for source review rather than assigned a stronger semantic role.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Informal convention growth"]}, "function": "MALFORMED", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because the source wording is not structurally clear enough to support a formal trigger role without clarification.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Informal convention growth"}, {"display_text": "Meaning change pressure.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Symbolic meaning needs enough stability for coordination, retrieval, legitimacy, and interoperability, but conventions must also remain adaptable as usage, stakeholders, domains, and social meanings change. In this archetype, the relevant source condition requiring clarification is: Meaning change pressure. The wording is retained for source review rather than assigned a stronger semantic role.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Meaning change pressure", "Symbolic meaning needs enough stability for coordination, retrieval, legitimacy, and interoperability, but conventions must also remain adaptable as usage, stakeholders, domains, and social meanings change."]}, "function": "MALFORMED", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because the source wording is not structurally clear enough to support a formal trigger role without clarification.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Meaning change pressure"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 67, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-067", "ledger_sha256": "fb71600acf9587d78ee661dc294e40695b7aa2e8b2ccdbf1519cc4d3eb5b98e0"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Symmetry-Based Fairness", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:symmetry_based_fairness", "slug": "symmetry_based_fairness"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is unexplained asymmetry. A system claims to use a rule, but treatment shifts across cases that appear equivalent. Sometimes the variation comes from hidden bias, habit, convenience, reviewer preference, historical accident, or local interpretation. Sometimes the variation is justified, but the justification is not recorded.\n\nThe result is a legitimacy gap. People cannot tell whether different treatment reflects a relevant difference or an arbitrary one. Decision-makers may also lose track of their own standards, creating drift over time.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A decision system treats cases differently without showing which differences are relevant to the decision, making unequal treatment look like discretion, noise, bias, or hidden preference rather than justified differentiation."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Fairness can be violated by uniformly bad treatment rather than disparate treatment.", "slug": "fairness"}], "residual_id": "r:symmetry_based_fairness:b067_a02_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b067_a02_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when similar cases receive different benefits, burdens, access, penalties, rankings, standards, or review intensity, and the system cannot clearly explain which differences matter. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Similar cases receive different outcomes, burdens, access, penalties, rankings, or benefits.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Similar cases receive different outcomes, burdens, access, penalties, rankings, or benefits.", "Use this archetype when similar cases receive different benefits, burdens, access, penalties, rankings, standards, or review intensity, and the system cannot clearly explain which differences matter."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Fairness can be violated by uniformly bad treatment rather than disparate treatment.", "slug": "fairness"}], "normalized_requirement": "Similar cases receive different outcomes, burdens, access, penalties, rankings, or benefits.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Similar cases receive different outcomes, burdens, access, penalties, rankings, or benefits.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P102-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a decision authority, comparable cases, and differentiated treatment.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Decision-makers oversee or make decisions in which cases may receive different treatment.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail absence of an articulable difference rather than an explicit but disputed reason.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The decision-makers cannot state the differences on which justified differentiation depends.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the missing justification relation between a difference and the treatment it is supposed to license.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "No stated relevance rule links case differences to the different treatment.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Decision-makers cannot state which differences justify different treatment.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "decision-makers cannot articulate treatment-relevant differences", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P102-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A fairness problem can involve an explicit but morally invalid rationale.", "slug": "fairness"}], "residual_id": "r:symmetry_based_fairness:b067_a02_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b067_a02_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "People cannot tell whether different treatment reflects a relevant difference or an arbitrary one. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Decision-makers cannot state which differences justify different treatment.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Decision-makers cannot state which differences justify different treatment.", "People cannot tell whether different treatment reflects a relevant difference or an arbitrary one."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A fairness problem can involve an explicit but morally invalid rationale.", "slug": "fairness"}], "normalized_requirement": "Decision-makers cannot state which differences justify different treatment.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Decision-makers cannot state which differences justify different treatment.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P102-C13", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a rule-governed system and more than one application context.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A decision or operating system applies rules in multiple contexts.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail actual rule difference rather than one rule applied consistently.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The applicable rules vary between the contexts.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the absence of a stated justification rather than a rationale judged invalid.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "No explicit rationale is supplied for the variation.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires unit-indexed rule variation.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The rules vary across organizational units.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires reviewer-indexed rule variation.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The rules vary across reviewers.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires time-indexed rule variation.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The rules vary across time periods.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires category-indexed rule variation.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The rules vary across categories.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Rules vary across units, reviewers, time periods, or categories without an explicit rationale.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "rules vary across contexts without explicit rationale", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P102-C13-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Procedural unfairness can arise under one consistently applied rule.", "slug": "procedural_fairness_due_process"}], "residual_id": "r:symmetry_based_fairness:b067_a02_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b067_a02_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when decisions recur across locations, reviewers, departments, time periods, or categories. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Rules vary across units, reviewers, time periods, or categories without an explicit rationale.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Rules vary across units, reviewers, time periods, or categories without an explicit rationale.", "It is especially useful when decisions recur across locations, reviewers, departments, time periods, or categories."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Procedural unfairness can arise under one consistently applied rule.", "slug": "procedural_fairness_due_process"}], "normalized_requirement": "Rules vary across units, reviewers, time periods, or categories without an explicit rationale.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Rules vary across units, reviewers, time periods, or categories without an explicit rationale.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A relevant label can still be used unfairly.", "slug": "fairness"}], "residual_id": "r:symmetry_based_fairness:b067_a02_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b067_a02_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A classification or allocation system depends on labels that may be irrelevant to the outcome being decided. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A classification or allocation system depends on labels that may be irrelevant to the outcome being decided."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A relevant label can still be used unfairly.", "slug": "fairness"}], "normalized_requirement": "A classification or allocation system depends on labels that may be irrelevant to the outcome being decided.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A classification or allocation system depends on labels that may be irrelevant to the outcome being decided.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Stakeholders suspect favoritism, discrimination, arbitrary exceptions, or inconsistent precedent.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Stakeholders suspect favoritism, discrimination, arbitrary exceptions, or inconsistent precedent. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders suspect favoritism, discrimination, arbitrary exceptions, or inconsistent precedent."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Stakeholders suspect favoritism, discrimination, arbitrary exceptions, or inconsistent precedent."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 67, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-067", "ledger_sha256": "fb71600acf9587d78ee661dc294e40695b7aa2e8b2ccdbf1519cc4d3eb5b98e0"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Symmetry Breaking for Differentiation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:symmetry_breaking_for_differentiation", "slug": "symmetry_breaking_for_differentiation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is not merely that a choice is hard. The problem is that the available choices are symmetrical for the current purpose. No option stands out enough to create a focal point, and the system cannot organize around pure equivalence.\n\nThis creates a tension between fairness and action. Preserving equivalence can feel principled, but it can also prevent structure from emerging. Breaking equivalence can unlock progress, but it creates a new asymmetry that must be justified and monitored.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system has multiple actors, options, states, names, standards, or positions that are equivalent for the current purpose, and the lack of differentiation prevents coordination, specialization, accountability, or forward movement."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Underspecification exists when several options fit available criteria equally and no ordinary comparison selects one.", "role_mapping": "Similar options -> admissible solutions; missing criterion -> underdetermination.", "slug": "underspecification", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b067_a03_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "No option stands out enough to create a focal point, and the system cannot organize around pure equivalence. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Several options or actors are similar enough that ordinary comparison cannot select among them without inventing a criterion.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Several options or actors are similar enough that ordinary comparison cannot select among them without inventing a criterion.", "No option stands out enough to create a focal point, and the system cannot organize around pure equivalence."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Underspecification", "one_liner": "A selection process treats evidence as if it picked out a single answer when many distinct answers fit it equally well, so a hidden closure silently chooses one representative and the behavior that distinguishes them is left uncontrolled.", "page_ref": "prime:underspecification", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Similar options -> admissible solutions; missing criterion -> underdetermination.", "slug": "underspecification", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Underspecification exists when several options fit available criteria equally and no ordinary comparison selects one."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Several options or actors are similar enough that ordinary comparison cannot select among them without inventing a criterion.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P102-C14", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve plural actors and a shared work or coordination target.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Work requires coordination among multiple actors.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must make absence of differentiation causal for the stall rather than merely accompany it.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The work stalls because the actors lack a differentiating coordination commitment.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires absence of role differentiation.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "No actor has a distinct role.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires absence of a differentiating initiation commitment.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "No actor has the assigned first move.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires absence of differentiated ownership.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "No actor has a distinct ownership boundary.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires absence of differentiated decision authority.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "No actor has a decision right.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Work stalls because no one has a distinct role, first move, ownership boundary, or decision right.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "work stalls because actors lack a differentiating coordination commitment", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P102-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Opportunity asymmetry already distinguishes actors rather than leaving them symmetric.", "slug": "opportunity_asymmetry"}], "residual_id": "r:symmetry_breaking_for_differentiation:b067_a03_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b067_a03_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when the cost of continued neutrality has become visible: delayed decisions, repeated debates, role ambiguity, collision among labels or standards, and diffusion of responsibility. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Work stalls because no one has a distinct role, first move, ownership boundary, or decision right.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Work stalls because no one has a distinct role, first move, ownership boundary, or decision right.", "It is especially useful when the cost of continued neutrality has become visible: delayed decisions, repeated debates, role ambiguity, collision among labels or standards, and diffusion of responsibility."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Opportunity asymmetry already distinguishes actors rather than leaving them symmetric.", "slug": "opportunity_asymmetry"}], "normalized_requirement": "Work stalls because no one has a distinct role, first move, ownership boundary, or decision right.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Work stalls because no one has a distinct role, first move, ownership boundary, or decision right.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P102-C15", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve plural artifacts and their individual viability.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Two or more conventions, names, standards, slots, or equivalent coordination artifacts are each workable in isolation.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve interaction in a shared context rather than unrelated use in separate settings.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The artifacts compete or coexist in one operating context.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires incompatible claims on the same identifier, resource, position, or convention.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Their coexistence creates a collision.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires uncertainty about which artifact governs or what a shared expression means.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Their coexistence creates ambiguity.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Competing conventions, names, standards, or slots create collision or ambiguity even though each is individually workable.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "individually workable coordination artifacts conflict when combined", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P102-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Compatible conventions need not collide.", "slug": "compatibility"}], "residual_id": "r:symmetry_breaking_for_differentiation:b067_a03_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b067_a03_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Typical cases include tied decisions, duplicated responsibility, competing but equivalent names, overlapping territories, equivalent candidate standards, or teams that all could act but none is clearly responsible. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Competing conventions, names, standards, or slots create collision or ambiguity even though each is individually workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Competing conventions, names, standards, or slots create collision or ambiguity even though each is individually workable.", "Typical cases include tied decisions, duplicated responsibility, competing but equivalent names, overlapping territories, equivalent candidate standards, or teams that all could act but none is clearly responsible."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "With the merge-conflict record and both-edits-workable guard fixed, both artifacts are viable alone yet collide in the shared merge; semantic ambiguity outside that collision branch may vary.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Merge Conflict", "one_liner": "Halt an automatic merge and hand the decision to a human exactly where two branches diverged from their common ancestor on the same region, because a three-way merge over text can rank a one-sided edit but has no syntactic basis to choose between two competing edits whose correctness lives in intent it cannot see.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:merge_conflict", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "both_branch_edits_individually_workable", "predicate": "Both competing branch edits are individually workable relative to their common ancestor.", "rationale": "The branch-selection guard actualizes the exact record's named both-edits-correct manifestation without adding a role, relation, or solution operation."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "merge_conflict"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "Both competing branch edits are individually workable relative to their common ancestor."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "merge_conflict", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P102-C15-U1", "why_it_fits": "The DSA directly supplies coexistence and collision. One candidate-anchored contingent guard selects the expressly named both-edits-workable manifestation, completing the collision branch without adding a role or relation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Competing conventions, names, standards, or slots create collision or ambiguity even though each is individually workable.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Symmetry breaking is warranted when a transparent asymmetry selects among equivalent states at lower cost than indecision.", "role_mapping": "Perfect symmetry -> degenerate states; introduced difference -> selected state.", "slug": "symmetry_breaking", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b067_a03_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Breaking equivalence can unlock progress, but it creates a new asymmetry that must be justified and monitored. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Maintaining perfect symmetry now creates greater cost than introducing a transparent and reviewable asymmetry.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Maintaining perfect symmetry now creates greater cost than introducing a transparent and reviewable asymmetry.", "Breaking equivalence can unlock progress, but it creates a new asymmetry that must be justified and monitored."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Symmetry Breaking", "one_liner": "Loss of symmetry creates structure.", "page_ref": "prime:symmetry_breaking", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Perfect symmetry -> degenerate states; introduced difference -> selected state.", "slug": "symmetry_breaking", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Symmetry breaking is warranted when a transparent asymmetry selects among equivalent states at lower cost than indecision."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Maintaining perfect symmetry now creates greater cost than introducing a transparent and reviewable asymmetry.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A system needs a focal point, leader, canonical choice, namespace, territory, or sequence to coordinate distributed action.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "No option stands out enough to create a focal point, and the system cannot organize around pure equivalence. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: A system needs a focal point, leader, canonical choice, namespace, territory, or sequence to coordinate distributed action. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A system needs a focal point, leader, canonical choice, namespace, territory, or sequence to coordinate distributed action.", "No option stands out enough to create a focal point, and the system cannot organize around pure equivalence."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "A system needs a focal point, leader, canonical choice, namespace, territory, or sequence to coordinate distributed action."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 67, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-067", "ledger_sha256": "fb71600acf9587d78ee661dc294e40695b7aa2e8b2ccdbf1519cc4d3eb5b98e0"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Symmetry-Commuting Transformation Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:symmetry_commuting_transformation_design", "slug": "symmetry_commuting_transformation_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 6, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 6, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "6 of 8 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 8}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A model, rule, translation, allocation, interface, representation, or transformation pipeline is expected to preserve structure across changes of frame, label, orientation, scale, ordering, or representation, but the input and output spaces are not linked by an explicit equivariance contract. As a result, the system may treat equivalent transformed cases inconsistently, erase meaningful co-variation, encode arbitrary ordering or naming artifacts, or return outputs that cannot be compared across transformed contexts.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A model, rule, translation, allocation, interface, representation, or transformation pipeline is expected to preserve structure across changes of frame, label, orientation, scale, ordering, or representation, but the input and output spaces are not linked by an explicit equivariance contract. As a result, the system may treat equivalent transformed cases inconsistently, erase meaningful co-variation, encode arbitrary ordering or naming artifacts, or return outputs that cannot be compared across transformed contexts."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Equivariance begins with a defined transformation acting on inputs.", "role_mapping": "Input operation -> group action.", "slug": "equivariance", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b067_a04_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A model, rule, translation, allocation, interface, representation, or transformation pipeline is expected to preserve structure across changes of frame, label, orientation, scale, ordering, or representation, but the input and output spaces are not linked by an explicit equivariance contract. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Inputs can be transformed by a meaningful operation such as rotation, translation, relabeling, permutation, coordinate-frame shift, schema rewrite, or role-preserving substitution.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Inputs can be transformed by a meaningful operation such as rotation, translation, relabeling, permutation, coordinate-frame shift, schema rewrite, or role-preserving substitution.", "A model, rule, translation, allocation, interface, representation, or transformation pipeline is expected to preserve structure across changes of frame, label, orientation, scale, ordering, or representation, but the input and output spaces are not linked by an explicit equivariance contract."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Equivariance", "one_liner": "A map whose output transforms in step with transformations of its input.", "page_ref": "prime:equivariance", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Input operation -> group action.", "slug": "equivariance", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Equivariance begins with a defined transformation acting on inputs."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Inputs can be transformed by a meaningful operation such as rotation, translation, relabeling, permutation, coordinate-frame shift, schema rewrite, or role-preserving substitution.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The defining commuting relation requires output to transform in the known corresponding way.", "role_mapping": "Input transform -> action; output transform -> representation action.", "slug": "equivariance", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b067_a04_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A model, rule, translation, allocation, interface, representation, or transformation pipeline is expected to preserve structure across changes of frame, label, orientation, scale, ordering, or representation, but the input and output spaces are not linked by an explicit equivariance contract. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The output is expected to transform in a known corresponding way rather than stay identical or change arbitrarily.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The output is expected to transform in a known corresponding way rather than stay identical or change arbitrarily.", "A model, rule, translation, allocation, interface, representation, or transformation pipeline is expected to preserve structure across changes of frame, label, orientation, scale, ordering, or representation, but the input and output spaces are not linked by an explicit equivariance contract."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Equivariance", "one_liner": "A map whose output transforms in step with transformations of its input.", "page_ref": "prime:equivariance", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Input transform -> action; output transform -> representation action.", "slug": "equivariance", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The defining commuting relation requires output to transform in the known corresponding way."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The output is expected to transform in a known corresponding way rather than stay identical or change arbitrarily.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "An equivariant rule can be reused across frames, permutations, relabelings, or geometric configurations.", "role_mapping": "Reference frames -> transformed inputs; reused rule -> equivariant map.", "slug": "equivariance", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b067_a04_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A model, rule, translation, allocation, interface, representation, or transformation pipeline is expected to preserve structure across changes of frame, label, orientation, scale, ordering, or representation, but the input and output spaces are not linked by an explicit equivariance contract. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A model or rule is reused across reference frames, data orderings, label systems, geometric configurations, or equivalent cases.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A model or rule is reused across reference frames, data orderings, label systems, geometric configurations, or equivalent cases.", "A model, rule, translation, allocation, interface, representation, or transformation pipeline is expected to preserve structure across changes of frame, label, orientation, scale, ordering, or representation, but the input and output spaces are not linked by an explicit equivariance contract."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Equivariance", "one_liner": "A map whose output transforms in step with transformations of its input.", "page_ref": "prime:equivariance", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Reference frames -> transformed inputs; reused rule -> equivariant map.", "slug": "equivariance", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "An equivariant rule can be reused across frames, permutations, relabelings, or geometric configurations."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A model or rule is reused across reference frames, data orderings, label systems, geometric configurations, or equivalent cases.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Equivariance prevents arbitrary coordinate or representation choices from changing substantive results.", "role_mapping": "Representation choice -> transformation; substantive result -> covariant output.", "slug": "equivariance", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b067_a04_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "As a result, the system may treat equivalent transformed cases inconsistently, erase meaningful co-variation, encode arbitrary ordering or naming artifacts, or return outputs that cannot be compared across transformed contexts. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Users need confidence that arbitrary representation choices do not determine substantive results.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Users need confidence that arbitrary representation choices do not determine substantive results.", "As a result, the system may treat equivalent transformed cases inconsistently, erase meaningful co-variation, encode arbitrary ordering or naming artifacts, or return outputs that cannot be compared across transformed contexts."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Equivariance", "one_liner": "A map whose output transforms in step with transformations of its input.", "page_ref": "prime:equivariance", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Representation choice -> transformation; substantive result -> covariant output.", "slug": "equivariance", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Equivariance prevents arbitrary coordinate or representation choices from changing substantive results."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Users need confidence that arbitrary representation choices do not determine substantive results.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Downstream structure is preserved because the map commutes with the input transformation.", "role_mapping": "Structural relationship -> commuting diagram.", "slug": "equivariance", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b067_a04_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It must preserve structure while allowing outputs to move, relabel, rotate, reorder, or reframe in exactly the way the input transformation requires. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A downstream process depends on the output retaining the same structural relationship to the transformed input.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A downstream process depends on the output retaining the same structural relationship to the transformed input.", "It must preserve structure while allowing outputs to move, relabel, rotate, reorder, or reframe in exactly the way the input transformation requires."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Equivariance", "one_liner": "A map whose output transforms in step with transformations of its input.", "page_ref": "prime:equivariance", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Structural relationship -> commuting diagram.", "slug": "equivariance", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Downstream structure is preserved because the map commutes with the input transformation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A downstream process depends on the output retaining the same structural relationship to the transformed input.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Failures under harmless transformations directly violate the expected equivariance relation.", "role_mapping": "Test transform -> input action; failure -> noncommutation.", "slug": "equivariance", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b067_a04_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Testing shows good average performance but unexplained failures under simple transformations that should be harmless or predictable. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Testing shows good average performance but unexplained failures under simple transformations that should be harmless or predictable."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Equivariance", "one_liner": "A map whose output transforms in step with transformations of its input.", "page_ref": "prime:equivariance", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Test transform -> input action; failure -> noncommutation.", "slug": "equivariance", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Failures under harmless transformations directly violate the expected equivariance relation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Testing shows good average performance but unexplained failures under simple transformations that should be harmless or predictable.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P103-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve an outcome-producing process and its represented input roles without requiring that the process itself be governance-specific.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An outcome-producing process receives inputs represented under a label, row order, namespace, coordinate convention, or equivalent frame.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve substantive equivalence across the transformation rather than cases that differ on a decision-relevant feature.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Two inputs differ only by relabeling, row order, namespace, coordinate convention, or an equivalent representation choice.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must make the arbitrary transformation causal for outcome difference rather than merely correlated with it.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The representation change causes the process to return a different outcome.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the governance or fairness consequence rather than an inconsequential non-governance variation.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The changed outcome creates a governance or fairness problem.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Relabeling, row ordering, namespace choice, or coordinate convention changes an outcome and thereby creates a governance or fairness problem.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "arbitrary representation change alters an outcome and creates a governance problem", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P103-C01-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Equivariance can fail in non-governance domains without fairness consequences.", "slug": "equivariance"}], "residual_id": "r:symmetry_commuting_transformation_design:b067_a04_c7", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b067_a04_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A model, rule, translation, allocation, interface, representation, or transformation pipeline is expected to preserve structure across changes of frame, label, orientation, scale, ordering, or representation, but the input and output spaces are not linked by an explicit equivariance contract. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A governance or fairness problem appears because relabeling, row ordering, namespace choice, or coordinate convention changes outcomes.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A governance or fairness problem appears because relabeling, row ordering, namespace choice, or coordinate convention changes outcomes.", "A model, rule, translation, allocation, interface, representation, or transformation pipeline is expected to preserve structure across changes of frame, label, orientation, scale, ordering, or representation, but the input and output spaces are not linked by an explicit equivariance contract."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Equivariance can fail in non-governance domains without fairness consequences.", "slug": "equivariance"}], "normalized_requirement": "A governance or fairness problem appears because relabeling, row ordering, namespace choice, or coordinate convention changes outcomes.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A governance or fairness problem appears because relabeling, row ordering, namespace choice, or coordinate convention changes outcomes.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An equivariant system need not include a distinct invariant quantity.", "slug": "equivariance"}], "residual_id": "r:symmetry_commuting_transformation_design:b067_a04_c8", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b067_a04_c8", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A domain requires both invariant and variant quantities, and the system currently confuses which is which. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A domain requires both invariant and variant quantities, and the system currently confuses which is which."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "An equivariant system need not include a distinct invariant quantity.", "slug": "equivariance"}], "normalized_requirement": "A domain requires both invariant and variant quantities, and the system currently confuses which is which.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A domain requires both invariant and variant quantities, and the system currently confuses which is which.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [8], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 67, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-067", "ledger_sha256": "fb71600acf9587d78ee661dc294e40695b7aa2e8b2ccdbf1519cc4d3eb5b98e0"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Synchronized Release Dampening", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:synchronized_release_dampening", "slug": "synchronized_release_dampening"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 5, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Many actors wait independently, receive or infer the same release signal, and then compete almost simultaneously for a finite resource that could have handled the same work if arrivals were decorrelated over time.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Many actors wait independently, receive or infer the same release signal, and then compete almost simultaneously for a finite resource that could have handled the same work if arrivals were decorrelated over time."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A thundering herd begins when one event wakes or releases many waiters simultaneously.", "role_mapping": "Shared signal -> wake event; waiters -> herd.", "slug": "thundering_herd", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b067_a05_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Shared signals are efficient for coordination, but the same coordination can remove temporal diversity and turn independent waiters into synchronized demand at exactly the moment the finite resource is most fragile. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A shared signal, expiry, unlock, recovery notice, cache invalidation, outage restoration, announcement, alarm, or status change releases many waiters.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A shared signal, expiry, unlock, recovery notice, cache invalidation, outage restoration, announcement, alarm, or status change releases many waiters.", "Shared signals are efficient for coordination, but the same coordination can remove temporal diversity and turn independent waiters into synchronized demand at exactly the moment the finite resource is most fragile."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Thundering Herd", "one_liner": "Many independent waiters are released by a single shared signal and collide at once on a finite resource, so the failure lives in the correlated timing of their release rather than in the population size or the resource capacity.", "page_ref": "prime:thundering_herd", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Shared signal -> wake event; waiters -> herd.", "slug": "thundering_herd", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A thundering herd begins when one event wakes or releases many waiters simultaneously."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A shared signal, expiry, unlock, recovery notice, cache invalidation, outage restoration, announcement, alarm, or status change releases many waiters.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Similar retry and timeout logic synchronizes the waiters' immediate actions.", "role_mapping": "Retry logic -> synchronized schedule.", "slug": "thundering_herd", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b067_a05_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Waiters have similar retry logic, polling intervals, timeout thresholds, subscription callbacks, or incentive to act immediately. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Waiters have similar retry logic, polling intervals, timeout thresholds, subscription callbacks, or incentive to act immediately."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Thundering Herd", "one_liner": "Many independent waiters are released by a single shared signal and collide at once on a finite resource, so the failure lives in the correlated timing of their release rather than in the population size or the resource capacity.", "page_ref": "prime:thundering_herd", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Retry logic -> synchronized schedule.", "slug": "thundering_herd", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Similar retry and timeout logic synchronizes the waiters' immediate actions."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Waiters have similar retry logic, polling intervals, timeout thresholds, subscription callbacks, or incentive to act immediately.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The herd overloads a finite shared service, lock, queue, or bandwidth resource.", "role_mapping": "Target resource -> contended service; waiters -> concurrent demand.", "slug": "thundering_herd", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b067_a05_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Shared signals are efficient for coordination, but the same coordination can remove temporal diversity and turn independent waiters into synchronized demand at exactly the moment the finite resource is most fragile. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The target resource has finite concurrency, lock, database, queue, worker, bandwidth, attention, or service capacity.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The target resource has finite concurrency, lock, database, queue, worker, bandwidth, attention, or service capacity.", "Shared signals are efficient for coordination, but the same coordination can remove temporal diversity and turn independent waiters into synchronized demand at exactly the moment the finite resource is most fragile."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Thundering Herd", "one_liner": "Many independent waiters are released by a single shared signal and collide at once on a finite resource, so the failure lives in the correlated timing of their release rather than in the population size or the resource capacity.", "page_ref": "prime:thundering_herd", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Target resource -> contended service; waiters -> concurrent demand.", "slug": "thundering_herd", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The herd overloads a finite shared service, lock, queue, or bandwidth resource."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The target resource has finite concurrency, lock, database, queue, worker, bandwidth, attention, or service capacity.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Adding capacity without desynchronizing the trigger leaves the herd mechanism intact.", "role_mapping": "Capacity addition -> scale remedy; shared synchronization -> cause.", "slug": "thundering_herd", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b067_a05_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Operators are tempted to add capacity while leaving the shared synchronization mechanism unchanged. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Operators are tempted to add capacity while leaving the shared synchronization mechanism unchanged."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Thundering Herd", "one_liner": "Many independent waiters are released by a single shared signal and collide at once on a finite resource, so the failure lives in the correlated timing of their release rather than in the population size or the resource capacity.", "page_ref": "prime:thundering_herd", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Capacity addition -> scale remedy; shared synchronization -> cause.", "slug": "thundering_herd", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Adding capacity without desynchronizing the trigger leaves the herd mechanism intact."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Operators are tempted to add capacity while leaving the shared synchronization mechanism unchanged.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Synchronized release produces a sharp transient load spike rather than a sustained demand trend.", "role_mapping": "Spike -> herd arrival burst.", "slug": "thundering_herd", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b067_a05_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The failure appears as a sharp spike rather than a sustained steady-state load increase. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The failure appears as a sharp spike rather than a sustained steady-state load increase."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Thundering Herd", "one_liner": "Many independent waiters are released by a single shared signal and collide at once on a finite resource, so the failure lives in the correlated timing of their release rather than in the population size or the resource capacity.", "page_ref": "prime:thundering_herd", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Spike -> herd arrival burst.", "slug": "thundering_herd", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Synchronized release produces a sharp transient load spike rather than a sustained demand trend."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The failure appears as a sharp spike rather than a sustained steady-state load increase.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The work can be staged, coalesced, sampled, buffered, or delayed without destroying the value of the release.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Many actors wait independently, receive or infer the same release signal, and then compete almost simultaneously for a finite resource that could have handled the same work if arrivals were decorrelated over time. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: The work can be staged, coalesced, sampled, buffered, or delayed without destroying the value of the release. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The work can be staged, coalesced, sampled, buffered, or delayed without destroying the value of the release.", "Many actors wait independently, receive or infer the same release signal, and then compete almost simultaneously for a finite resource that could have handled the same work if arrivals were decorrelated over time."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The work can be staged, coalesced, sampled, buffered, or delayed without destroying the value of the release."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 67, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-067", "ledger_sha256": "fb71600acf9587d78ee661dc294e40695b7aa2e8b2ccdbf1519cc4d3eb5b98e0"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Synchrony Induction and Rhythm Alignment", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:synchrony_induction_and_rhythm_alignment", "slug": "synchrony_induction_and_rhythm_alignment"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A group wants shared energy, cohesion, readiness, or emotional convergence, but participants remain temporally, attentively, vocally, physically, or procedurally fragmented.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A group wants shared energy, cohesion, readiness, or emotional convergence, but participants remain temporally, attentively, vocally, physically, or procedurally fragmented."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Collective effervescence requires participants to feel and act as a coordinated group rather than merely coexist.", "role_mapping": "Participants -> collective; felt togetherness -> effervescence.", "slug": "collective_effervescence", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b067_a06_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A group activity depends on people feeling or acting together rather than merely being co-present. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A group activity depends on people feeling or acting together rather than merely being co-present."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Collective Effervescence", "one_liner": "Shared emotional energy.", "page_ref": "prime:collective_effervescence", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Participants -> collective; felt togetherness -> effervescence.", "slug": "collective_effervescence", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Collective effervescence requires participants to feel and act as a coordinated group rather than merely coexist."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A group activity depends on people feeling or acting together rather than merely being co-present.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Ritual rhythm and synchronized action build shared arousal, attention, and commitment.", "role_mapping": "Ceremony or protest -> ritual; shared pulse -> collective intensity.", "slug": "collective_effervescence", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b067_a06_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A ceremony, performance, protest, class, meeting, drill, launch, or ritual needs a shared pulse to build attention or commitment. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A ceremony, performance, protest, class, meeting, drill, launch, or ritual needs a shared pulse to build attention or commitment."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Collective Effervescence", "one_liner": "Shared emotional energy.", "page_ref": "prime:collective_effervescence", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Ceremony or protest -> ritual; shared pulse -> collective intensity.", "slug": "collective_effervescence", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Ritual rhythm and synchronized action build shared arousal, attention, and commitment."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A ceremony, performance, protest, class, meeting, drill, launch, or ritual needs a shared pulse to build attention or commitment.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P103-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve an existing shared-participation setting with plural contributor roles.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A group has multiple participants contributing to a shared activity.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail distributed or disconnected participation at the group level rather than merely diverse contribution content.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The participants' contributions are scattered rather than joined into a common participation pattern.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Existing group participation is scattered.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "group participation is scattered", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P103-C02-U1"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P103-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve an existing group-participation setting and interacting participant roles.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A group has participants engaging in a shared activity.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail awkwardness as a property of the participation rather than an unrelated observer judgment.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The participation is awkward or interactionally ill-fitting.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "Existing group participation is awkward.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "group participation is awkward", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P103-C02-U2"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P103-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve an existing group-participation setting and participant roles.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A group has participants engaging in a shared activity.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail timid participation rather than merely low contribution caused by absence or irrelevance.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The participants engage timidly or with inhibited willingness to contribute.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "Existing group participation is timid.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "group participation is timid", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P103-C02-U3"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P103-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve an existing group-participation setting and participant roles.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A group has participants engaging in a shared activity.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail over-intellectualization as a load-bearing property of the participation, not merely the legitimate use of analysis.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The participation is excessively intellectualized.", "type": "DOMAIN"}], "predicate": "Existing group participation is over-intellectualized.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "group participation is over-intellectualized", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P103-C02-U4"}, {"case_id": "DSAPV2-P103-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the wider participant group and a distinct performer subset acting without integration into shared participation.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A group has multiple participants and a subset who act as isolated performers.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail disproportionate control or occupation of the shared participation space by the isolated performer subset.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The isolated performers dominate the group's participation.", "type": "RELATION"}], "predicate": "Existing group participation is dominated by isolated performers.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "isolated performers dominate group participation", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P103-C02-U5"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Rhythmic activity can already be cohesive and confident.", "slug": "rhythm"}], "residual_id": "r:synchrony_induction_and_rhythm_alignment:b067_a06_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b067_a06_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Existing participation is scattered, awkward, timid, over-intellectualized, or dominated by isolated performers. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Existing participation is scattered, awkward, timid, over-intellectualized, or dominated by isolated performers."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 5, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 5}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Rhythmic activity can already be cohesive and confident.", "slug": "rhythm"}], "normalized_requirement": "Existing participation is scattered, awkward, timid, over-intellectualized, or dominated by isolated performers.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 5 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Existing participation is scattered, awkward, timid, over-intellectualized, or dominated by isolated performers.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime entails a transition into heightened collective focus and eventual release.", "role_mapping": "Heightened focus -> effervescence; controlled release -> ritual boundary.", "slug": "collective_effervescence", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b067_a06_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The group needs a transition into heightened collective focus or a controlled release from it. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The group needs a transition into heightened collective focus or a controlled release from it."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Collective Effervescence", "one_liner": "Shared emotional energy.", "page_ref": "prime:collective_effervescence", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Heightened focus -> effervescence; controlled release -> ritual boundary.", "slug": "collective_effervescence", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime entails a transition into heightened collective focus and eventual release."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The group needs a transition into heightened collective focus or a controlled release from it.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A facilitator can introduce cues, rhythm, timing, sequence, or shared action.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: A facilitator can introduce cues, rhythm, timing, sequence, or shared action. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A facilitator can introduce cues, rhythm, timing, sequence, or shared action."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "A facilitator can introduce cues, rhythm, timing, sequence, or shared action."}, {"display_text": "Participants vary in ability, culture, safety, or comfort, so synchrony must be made accessible rather than assumed.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Synchrony can create unity by reducing temporal difference, but the same reduction can erase legitimate difference, coerce conformity, overload participants, or suppress dissent. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: Participants vary in ability, culture, safety, or comfort, so synchrony must be made accessible rather than assumed. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Participants vary in ability, culture, safety, or comfort, so synchrony must be made accessible rather than assumed.", "Synchrony can create unity by reducing temporal difference, but the same reduction can erase legitimate difference, coerce conformity, overload participants, or suppress dissent."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Participants vary in ability, culture, safety, or comfort, so synchrony must be made accessible rather than assumed."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 67, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-067", "ledger_sha256": "fb71600acf9587d78ee661dc294e40695b7aa2e8b2ccdbf1519cc4d3eb5b98e0"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Synergistic Combination Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:synergistic_combination_design", "slug": "synergistic_combination_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is under-realized interaction value. Separate elements are evaluated, funded, staffed, or optimized as if each one can deliver the outcome on its own. In practice, the outcome pathway may require several conditions to be present together. When the necessary relation is missing, the pieces look disappointing, and the organization may discard useful elements rather than connect them properly.\n\nThe opposite failure is also common: people call a long list of components a synergistic package without evidence that the parts reinforce one another. That creates bundle bloat, attribution fog, and coordination overhead. The archetype therefore has two simultaneous jobs: create beneficial reinforcement and keep the combination disciplined.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Separate elements each provide some value, but their potential reinforcing interaction is unused, accidental, under-designed, or hidden by local optimization. The system deploys useful pieces in isolation, in the wrong sequence, or without the connection that would let one element activate, protect, amplify, or complete another."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Synergy combines components whose effects interact on the same outcome pathway.", "role_mapping": "Partial solutions -> components; shared outcome -> response.", "slug": "synergy_and_antagonism", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b067_a07_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "In practice, the outcome pathway may require several conditions to be present together. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Multiple partial solutions address different gaps in the same outcome pathway.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Multiple partial solutions address different gaps in the same outcome pathway.", "In practice, the outcome pathway may require several conditions to be present together."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Synergy and Antagonism", "one_liner": "Amplified or diminished effects.", "page_ref": "prime:synergy_and_antagonism", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Partial solutions -> components; shared outcome -> response.", "slug": "synergy_and_antagonism", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Synergy combines components whose effects interact on the same outcome pathway."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Multiple partial solutions address different gaps in the same outcome pathway.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A component that works only after another creates its enabling condition is a positive interaction.", "role_mapping": "First component -> enabling condition; second -> conditional effect.", "slug": "synergy_and_antagonism", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b067_a07_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The opposite failure is also common: people call a long list of components a synergistic package without evidence that the parts reinforce one another. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A component works only after another condition is created.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A component works only after another condition is created.", "The opposite failure is also common: people call a long list of components a synergistic package without evidence that the parts reinforce one another."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Synergy and Antagonism", "one_liner": "Amplified or diminished effects.", "page_ref": "prime:synergy_and_antagonism", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "First component -> enabling condition; second -> conditional effect.", "slug": "synergy_and_antagonism", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A component that works only after another creates its enabling condition is a positive interaction."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A component works only after another condition is created.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Task interdependence can be additive rather than synergistic.", "slug": "task_interdependence"}], "residual_id": "r:synergistic_combination_design:b067_a07_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b067_a07_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The signal is not merely that many good ideas exist; it is that the desired outcome depends on relations among elements: one creates readiness, another supplies capability, another creates motivation, another supplies feedback, and another removes a barrier. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The desired outcome requires both capability and motivation, infrastructure and adoption, rule and support, or platform and complements.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The desired outcome requires both capability and motivation, infrastructure and adoption, rule and support, or platform and complements.", "The signal is not merely that many good ideas exist; it is that the desired outcome depends on relations among elements: one creates readiness, another supplies capability, another creates motivation, another supplies feedback, and another removes a barrier."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Task interdependence can be additive rather than synergistic.", "slug": "task_interdependence"}], "normalized_requirement": "The desired outcome requires both capability and motivation, infrastructure and adoption, rule and support, or platform and complements.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The desired outcome requires both capability and motivation, infrastructure and adoption, rule and support, or platform and complements.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A positive non-additive interaction is exactly synergy.", "role_mapping": "Interaction map -> combined effect; non-additivity -> synergy.", "slug": "synergy_and_antagonism", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b067_a07_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially appropriate after **Interaction Effect Mapping* has found a positive non-additive interaction, or when field experience strongly suggests that an intervention fails because its complement is missing. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: An interaction map has identified a positive non-additive combination.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["An interaction map has identified a positive non-additive combination.", "It is especially appropriate after **Interaction Effect Mapping* has found a positive non-additive interaction, or when field experience strongly suggests that an intervention fails because its complement is missing."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Synergy and Antagonism", "one_liner": "Amplified or diminished effects.", "page_ref": "prime:synergy_and_antagonism", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Interaction map -> combined effect; non-additivity -> synergy.", "slug": "synergy_and_antagonism", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A positive non-additive interaction is exactly synergy."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "An interaction map has identified a positive non-additive combination.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Isolated interventions underperform despite plausible value.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when several elements each have plausible value but the real opportunity lies in their interaction. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Isolated interventions underperform despite plausible value. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Isolated interventions underperform despite plausible value.", "Use this archetype when several elements each have plausible value but the real opportunity lies in their interaction."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "Isolated interventions underperform despite plausible value."}, {"display_text": "Stakeholders are choosing a package, bundle, policy mix, or program design.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The design problem is to create enough integration for reinforcement without turning the solution into a brittle, over-bundled, hard-to-evaluate package. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Stakeholders are choosing a package, bundle, policy mix, or program design. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders are choosing a package, bundle, policy mix, or program design.", "The design problem is to create enough integration for reinforcement without turning the solution into a brittle, over-bundled, hard-to-evaluate package."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Stakeholders are choosing a package, bundle, policy mix, or program design."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 67, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-067", "ledger_sha256": "fb71600acf9587d78ee661dc294e40695b7aa2e8b2ccdbf1519cc4d3eb5b98e0"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "System Archetype Diagnosis", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:system_archetype_diagnosis", "slug": "system_archetype_diagnosis"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 6, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 6, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "6 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is that actors experience events, while the system behaves through loops. People see a backlog, a conflict, a shortage, or a failure. They respond to that symptom. Their response changes incentives, capacity, trust, delay, resource availability, or expectations. Those changes then feed back into the original symptom, sometimes after enough delay that the connection is missed.\n\nWithout archetype diagnosis, each recurrence is treated as new. The organization keeps solving the apparent problem while preserving the structure that regenerates it.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system exhibits recurring behavior generated by a familiar feedback structure, but actors treat each occurrence as a local event, personality problem, resource shortage, or one-off failure. Because the feedback pattern remains unnamed, interventions target symptoms and the problem returns."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "System archetypes describe recurring problems that persist after plausible local fixes.", "role_mapping": "Recurring problem -> archetypal behavior.", "slug": "system_archetypes", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b067_a08_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Typical clues include short-term fixes followed by relapse, growth that stalls against a constraint, escalation between actors, shared-resource degradation, or repeated surprise that the same problem appears in new places. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The same problem recurs after apparently reasonable fixes.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The same problem recurs after apparently reasonable fixes.", "Typical clues include short-term fixes followed by relapse, growth that stalls against a constraint, escalation between actors, shared-resource degradation, or repeated surprise that the same problem appears in new places."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "System Archetypes", "one_liner": "Recurring configurations of reinforcing and balancing feedback loops that generate the same characteristic system behavior across different domains, enabling structural diagnosis instead of symptom-chasing.", "page_ref": "prime:system_archetypes", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Recurring problem -> archetypal behavior.", "slug": "system_archetypes", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "System archetypes describe recurring problems that persist after plausible local fixes."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The same problem recurs after apparently reasonable fixes.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "They connect apparently separate symptoms through feedback, delay, resources, and dependency loops.", "role_mapping": "Symptoms -> loop effects; connected structure -> archetype.", "slug": "system_archetypes", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b067_a08_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Their response changes incentives, capacity, trust, delay, resource availability, or expectations. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Different stakeholders describe separate symptoms that appear connected through delay, incentive, resource, or dependency loops.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Different stakeholders describe separate symptoms that appear connected through delay, incentive, resource, or dependency loops.", "Their response changes incentives, capacity, trust, delay, resource availability, or expectations."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "System Archetypes", "one_liner": "Recurring configurations of reinforcing and balancing feedback loops that generate the same characteristic system behavior across different domains, enabling structural diagnosis instead of symptom-chasing.", "page_ref": "prime:system_archetypes", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Symptoms -> loop effects; connected structure -> archetype.", "slug": "system_archetypes", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "They connect apparently separate symptoms through feedback, delay, resources, and dependency loops."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Different stakeholders describe separate symptoms that appear connected through delay, incentive, resource, or dependency loops.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A common archetypal signature is local improvement paired with whole-system deterioration.", "role_mapping": "Local optimization -> intervention; whole worsening -> feedback consequence.", "slug": "system_archetypes", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b067_a08_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Local optimization improves one part of the system while worsening the whole. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Local optimization improves one part of the system while worsening the whole."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "System Archetypes", "one_liner": "Recurring configurations of reinforcing and balancing feedback loops that generate the same characteristic system behavior across different domains, enabling structural diagnosis instead of symptom-chasing.", "page_ref": "prime:system_archetypes", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Local optimization -> intervention; whole worsening -> feedback consequence.", "slug": "system_archetypes", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A common archetypal signature is local improvement paired with whole-system deterioration."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Local optimization improves one part of the system while worsening the whole.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Delayed relapse or escalation after short-term relief is a canonical archetypal dynamic.", "role_mapping": "Relief -> short response; deterioration -> delayed loop.", "slug": "system_archetypes", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b067_a08_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Typical clues include short-term fixes followed by relapse, growth that stalls against a constraint, escalation between actors, shared-resource degradation, or repeated surprise that the same problem appears in new places. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Short-term relief is followed by delayed deterioration, relapse, escalation, or renewed constraint.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Short-term relief is followed by delayed deterioration, relapse, escalation, or renewed constraint.", "Typical clues include short-term fixes followed by relapse, growth that stalls against a constraint, escalation between actors, shared-resource degradation, or repeated surprise that the same problem appears in new places."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "System Archetypes", "one_liner": "Recurring configurations of reinforcing and balancing feedback loops that generate the same characteristic system behavior across different domains, enabling structural diagnosis instead of symptom-chasing.", "page_ref": "prime:system_archetypes", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Relief -> short response; deterioration -> delayed loop.", "slug": "system_archetypes", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Delayed relapse or escalation after short-term relief is a canonical archetypal dynamic."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Short-term relief is followed by delayed deterioration, relapse, escalation, or renewed constraint.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Actors see segments of a circular structure and therefore disagree about linear causes.", "role_mapping": "Stakeholders -> partial views; circular causality -> full loop.", "slug": "system_archetypes", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b067_a08_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system exhibits recurring behavior generated by a familiar feedback structure, but actors treat each occurrence as a local event, personality problem, resource shortage, or one-off failure. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Actors disagree about causes because each sees only one segment of a circular causal structure.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Actors disagree about causes because each sees only one segment of a circular causal structure.", "A system exhibits recurring behavior generated by a familiar feedback structure, but actors treat each occurrence as a local event, personality problem, resource shortage, or one-off failure."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "System Archetypes", "one_liner": "Recurring configurations of reinforcing and balancing feedback loops that generate the same characteristic system behavior across different domains, enabling structural diagnosis instead of symptom-chasing.", "page_ref": "prime:system_archetypes", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Stakeholders -> partial views; circular causality -> full loop.", "slug": "system_archetypes", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Actors see segments of a circular structure and therefore disagree about linear causes."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Actors disagree about causes because each sees only one segment of a circular causal structure.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime requires enough recurring structure to compare against a known feedback template.", "role_mapping": "Recurring structure -> pattern; known archetype -> diagnostic class.", "slug": "system_archetypes", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b067_a08_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system exhibits recurring behavior generated by a familiar feedback structure, but actors treat each occurrence as a local event, personality problem, resource shortage, or one-off failure. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The system has enough recurring structure to compare against known archetypes rather than requiring a novel causal model from scratch.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The system has enough recurring structure to compare against known archetypes rather than requiring a novel causal model from scratch.", "A system exhibits recurring behavior generated by a familiar feedback structure, but actors treat each occurrence as a local event, personality problem, resource shortage, or one-off failure."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "System Archetypes", "one_liner": "Recurring configurations of reinforcing and balancing feedback loops that generate the same characteristic system behavior across different domains, enabling structural diagnosis instead of symptom-chasing.", "page_ref": "prime:system_archetypes", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Recurring structure -> pattern; known archetype -> diagnostic class.", "slug": "system_archetypes", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime requires enough recurring structure to compare against a known feedback template."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The system has enough recurring structure to compare against known archetypes rather than requiring a novel causal model from scratch.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 67, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-067", "ledger_sha256": "fb71600acf9587d78ee661dc294e40695b7aa2e8b2ccdbf1519cc4d3eb5b98e0"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "System Scope Definition", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:system_scope_definition", "slug": "system_scope_definition"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is **scope ambiguity**. A system is being discussed, measured, governed, modeled, or changed, but its boundary is not explicit enough to support coordinated action.\n\nThis ambiguity causes several recurring failures. Responsibility is diffuse because no one knows which part of the world the actor owns. Measurement is inconsistent because different people count different populations or time horizons. Analysis is unstable because causes move in and out of view. Work expands because adjacent requests are never consciously admitted or rejected. Interfaces fail because handoffs to adjacent systems were not named.\n\nThe root tension is between focus and completeness. A useful scope must be narrow enough to support action and broad enough to preserve the relevant whole.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A problem, project, model, or intervention lacks a clear boundary, causing unclear responsibility, inconsistent measurement, scope creep, contested assumptions, or misdirected action."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P103-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve plural actors and one shared focal system referent.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Multiple actors discuss or act on what they take to be the same system.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve unstated boundary assumptions rather than explicit alternative definitions.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Each actor's operative system definition remains implicit.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail different inclusion, exclusion, boundary, or component assumptions across actors.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The actors' implicit definitions of the system differ.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Different actors use different implicit definitions of the system they are discussing.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "actors use different implicit definitions of the same system", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P103-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Different representations can depict the same explicit system boundary.", "slug": "representation"}], "residual_id": "r:system_scope_definition:b067_a09_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b067_a09_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Different actors use different implicit definitions of the system they are discussing. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Different actors use different implicit definitions of the system they are discussing."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Different representations can depict the same explicit system boundary.", "slug": "representation"}], "normalized_requirement": "Different actors use different implicit definitions of the system they are discussing.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Different actors use different implicit definitions of the system they are discussing.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Authority can be ambiguous even with an explicit system boundary.", "slug": "delegation_of_authority"}], "residual_id": "r:system_scope_definition:b067_a09_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b067_a09_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A problem, project, model, or intervention lacks a clear boundary, causing unclear responsibility, inconsistent measurement, scope creep, contested assumptions, or misdirected action. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Responsibilities, measurements, or intervention targets are ambiguous because no one has stated what is inside the system-of-interest.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Responsibilities, measurements, or intervention targets are ambiguous because no one has stated what is inside the system-of-interest.", "A problem, project, model, or intervention lacks a clear boundary, causing unclear responsibility, inconsistent measurement, scope creep, contested assumptions, or misdirected action."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Authority can be ambiguous even with an explicit system boundary.", "slug": "delegation_of_authority"}], "normalized_requirement": "Responsibilities, measurements, or intervention targets are ambiguous because no one has stated what is inside the system-of-interest.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Responsibilities, measurements, or intervention targets are ambiguous because no one has stated what is inside the system-of-interest.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P103-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a work object and a current scope against which expansion can be evaluated.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A body of work has an operative scope or boundary.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail unchosen scope growth rather than a deliberate enlargement.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The scope expands without a conscious decision authorizing the expansion.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires requests neighboring the current scope to be the expansion channel.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Adjacent requests expand the work.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires exception handling to enlarge the operative scope.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Exceptions expand the work.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires connected dependencies to pull additional work into scope.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Dependencies expand the work.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Work expands without a conscious scope decision through adjacent requests, exceptions, or dependencies.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "work scope expands through adjacent demands without explicit scope decision", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P103-C04-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Transferability overclaim broadens inference, not necessarily project work.", "slug": "transferability_overclaim"}], "residual_id": "r:system_scope_definition:b067_a09_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b067_a09_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Work expands because adjacent requests are never consciously admitted or rejected. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Work expands through adjacent requests, exceptions, or dependencies without a conscious scope decision.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Work expands through adjacent requests, exceptions, or dependencies without a conscious scope decision.", "Work expands because adjacent requests are never consciously admitted or rejected."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Transferability overclaim broadens inference, not necessarily project work.", "slug": "transferability_overclaim"}], "normalized_requirement": "Work expands through adjacent requests, exceptions, or dependencies without a conscious scope decision.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Work expands through adjacent requests, exceptions, or dependencies without a conscious scope decision.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Outcome-defined adequacy can use correctly owned outcomes.", "slug": "outcome_defined_adequacy"}], "residual_id": "r:system_scope_definition:b067_a09_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b067_a09_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful before project planning, model building, research design, responsibility assignment, system mapping, policy design, service ownership, or operational improvement. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A model, policy, project, or service is being judged by outcomes that it may not actually own.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A model, policy, project, or service is being judged by outcomes that it may not actually own.", "It is especially useful before project planning, model building, research design, responsibility assignment, system mapping, policy design, service ownership, or operational improvement."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Outcome-defined adequacy can use correctly owned outcomes.", "slug": "outcome_defined_adequacy"}], "normalized_requirement": "A model, policy, project, or service is being judged by outcomes that it may not actually own.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A model, policy, project, or service is being judged by outcomes that it may not actually own.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A boundary has to be made explicit before another intervention can be chosen.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system is being discussed, measured, governed, modeled, or changed, but its boundary is not explicit enough to support coordinated action. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: A boundary has to be made explicit before another intervention can be chosen. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A boundary has to be made explicit before another intervention can be chosen.", "A system is being discussed, measured, governed, modeled, or changed, but its boundary is not explicit enough to support coordinated action."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "A boundary has to be made explicit before another intervention can be chosen."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 67, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-067", "ledger_sha256": "fb71600acf9587d78ee661dc294e40695b7aa2e8b2ccdbf1519cc4d3eb5b98e0"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Taboo Boundary Navigation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:taboo_boundary_navigation", "slug": "taboo_boundary_navigation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 6, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 6, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "6 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a blocked boundary. A taboo marks a zone where ordinary inquiry, representation, disagreement, or action becomes socially risky. Because people fear violation, shame, retaliation, stigma, or moral condemnation, the issue may remain unnamed even when it affects decisions and outcomes.\n\nAt the same time, taboo boundaries are not automatically irrational. They may protect dignity, grief, privacy, sacred meaning, vulnerable participants, or social trust. The problem is that the boundary’s protective function and its silencing function are often fused. People cannot tell whether they are preserving safety, preserving reputation, avoiding discomfort, protecting a value, or blocking accountability.\n\nThis archetype separates those layers so the boundary can be handled with purpose and safeguards.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A socially charged boundary marks a topic, act, disclosure, representation, or inquiry as forbidden. Because the boundary carries moral, identity, dignity, privacy, safety, or sacred significance, ordinary discussion can feel like violation, while avoidance can preserve harm, ignorance, exclusion, or unaccountable power. The result is a blocked problem space: people either avoid the matter entirely, transgress recklessly, or enforce the boundary without examining what it protects."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A taboo marks a topic or act as forbidden, profane, contaminating, or unspeakable.", "role_mapping": "Topic or act -> taboo object; forbidden status -> boundary.", "slug": "taboo", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b067_a10_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when a problem cannot be addressed because the relevant topic or action is treated as forbidden, shameful, profane, dangerous, contaminating, or socially punishable. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A topic or act is described as forbidden, unspeakable, off-limits, shameful, contaminating, disrespectful, profane, or dangerous to name.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A topic or act is described as forbidden, unspeakable, off-limits, shameful, contaminating, disrespectful, profane, or dangerous to name.", "Use this archetype when a problem cannot be addressed because the relevant topic or action is treated as forbidden, shameful, profane, dangerous, contaminating, or socially punishable."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Taboo", "one_liner": "Forbidden elements.", "page_ref": "prime:taboo", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Topic or act -> taboo object; forbidden status -> boundary.", "slug": "taboo", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A taboo marks a topic or act as forbidden, profane, contaminating, or unspeakable."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A topic or act is described as forbidden, unspeakable, off-limits, shameful, contaminating, disrespectful, profane, or dangerous to name.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Taboo enforcement blocks discussion or reform through anticipated stigma and punishment.", "role_mapping": "Necessary discussion -> prohibited engagement; backlash -> sanction.", "slug": "taboo", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b067_a10_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Because people fear violation, shame, retaliation, stigma, or moral condemnation, the issue may remain unnamed even when it affects decisions and outcomes. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Necessary discussion, research, reform, reporting, or enforcement is blocked because people fear violation, backlash, stigma, or social punishment.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Necessary discussion, research, reform, reporting, or enforcement is blocked because people fear violation, backlash, stigma, or social punishment.", "Because people fear violation, shame, retaliation, stigma, or moral condemnation, the issue may remain unnamed even when it affects decisions and outcomes."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Taboo", "one_liner": "Forbidden elements.", "page_ref": "prime:taboo", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Necessary discussion -> prohibited engagement; backlash -> sanction.", "slug": "taboo", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Taboo enforcement blocks discussion or reform through anticipated stigma and punishment."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Necessary discussion, research, reform, reporting, or enforcement is blocked because people fear violation, backlash, stigma, or social punishment.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Taboos create conflict between boundary challengers and those who experience challenge as desecration or harm.", "role_mapping": "Challengers -> reform side; defenders -> sacred boundary side.", "slug": "taboo", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b067_a10_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It asks what the boundary protects, whether that protection is legitimate, whether silence is causing harm, and what safeguards would allow the issue to be handled proportionately. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Some participants want to challenge the boundary while others experience challenge as disrespect, harm, or erasure.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Some participants want to challenge the boundary while others experience challenge as disrespect, harm, or erasure.", "It asks what the boundary protects, whether that protection is legitimate, whether silence is causing harm, and what safeguards would allow the issue to be handled proportionately."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Taboo", "one_liner": "Forbidden elements.", "page_ref": "prime:taboo", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Challengers -> reform side; defenders -> sacred boundary side.", "slug": "taboo", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Taboos create conflict between boundary challengers and those who experience challenge as desecration or harm."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Some participants want to challenge the boundary while others experience challenge as disrespect, harm, or erasure.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "People associated with a taboo risk shame, retaliation, stereotyping, or forced exposure.", "role_mapping": "Affected participants -> stigmatized group; disclosure -> sanction.", "slug": "taboo", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b067_a10_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Because people fear violation, shame, retaliation, stigma, or moral condemnation, the issue may remain unnamed even when it affects decisions and outcomes. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: People affected by the topic risk exposure, shame, retaliation, stereotyping, or forced testimony.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["People affected by the topic risk exposure, shame, retaliation, stereotyping, or forced testimony.", "Because people fear violation, shame, retaliation, stigma, or moral condemnation, the issue may remain unnamed even when it affects decisions and outcomes."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Taboo", "one_liner": "Forbidden elements.", "page_ref": "prime:taboo", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Affected participants -> stigmatized group; disclosure -> sanction.", "slug": "taboo", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "People associated with a taboo risk shame, retaliation, stereotyping, or forced exposure."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "People affected by the topic risk exposure, shame, retaliation, stereotyping, or forced testimony.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Because ordinary discourse rules break down around a taboo, shared engagement rules are absent or contested.", "role_mapping": "Forbidden matter -> discourse boundary.", "slug": "taboo", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b067_a10_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A group lacks shared rules for how to talk about the forbidden matter. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A group lacks shared rules for how to talk about the forbidden matter."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Taboo", "one_liner": "Forbidden elements.", "page_ref": "prime:taboo", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Forbidden matter -> discourse boundary.", "slug": "taboo", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Because ordinary discourse rules break down around a taboo, shared engagement rules are absent or contested."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A group lacks shared rules for how to talk about the forbidden matter.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Taboo boundaries are often socially and selectively enforced rather than uniformly legal rules.", "role_mapping": "Selective enforcement -> social sanction; boundary -> taboo.", "slug": "taboo", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b067_a10_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The boundary is enforced inconsistently, symbolically, or selectively. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The boundary is enforced inconsistently, symbolically, or selectively."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Taboo", "one_liner": "Forbidden elements.", "page_ref": "prime:taboo", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Selective enforcement -> social sanction; boundary -> taboo.", "slug": "taboo", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Taboo boundaries are often socially and selectively enforced rather than uniformly legal rules."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The boundary is enforced inconsistently, symbolically, or selectively.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 67, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-067", "ledger_sha256": "fb71600acf9587d78ee661dc294e40695b7aa2e8b2ccdbf1519cc4d3eb5b98e0"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Tacit Knowledge Elicitation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:tacit_knowledge_elicitation", "slug": "tacit_knowledge_elicitation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 6, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 6, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "6 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is invisible competence. The expert’s visible actions are available, but the hidden attention structure is not. Novices can copy the action without knowing why it happened, when it should change, what warning signs preceded it, what alternatives were considered, or which exceptions matter.\n\nThis is why purely procedural documentation often fails. A procedure may say what to do, but not what to notice. It may list escalation steps, but not the early signs that a case is becoming abnormal. It may describe a customer-support script, but not how an experienced agent hears confusion, fear, anger, or manipulation. It may list machine checks, but not the smell, vibration, or timing pattern that an expert uses to diagnose trouble.\n\nTacit knowledge also creates a reliability problem. If valuable know-how lives only in a person or informal group, the organization cannot inspect it, transfer it, improve it, or challenge it. It may lose the knowledge when people leave. It may also preserve unsafe habits because no one has made them visible enough to test.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A person or group reliably performs skillful judgments or actions, but the knowledge that makes the performance work remains unspoken, embodied, contextual, or distributed across practice. Others can see the visible behavior but cannot yet reproduce the underlying distinctions, cues, timing, or decision logic."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Implicit knowledge necessarily guides expert performance through cues not fully verbalized.", "role_mapping": "Unnamed cues -> tacit signals; performance -> skilled action.", "slug": "implicit_knowledge", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b067_a11_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use Tacit Knowledge Elicitation when performance depends on unspoken cues, distinctions, timing, and judgment. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Expert performance depends on unnamed cues.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Expert performance depends on unnamed cues", "Use Tacit Knowledge Elicitation when performance depends on unspoken cues, distinctions, timing, and judgment."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Implicit Knowledge", "one_liner": "Unconscious understanding.", "page_ref": "prime:implicit_knowledge", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Unnamed cues -> tacit signals; performance -> skilled action.", "slug": "implicit_knowledge", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Implicit knowledge necessarily guides expert performance through cues not fully verbalized."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Expert performance depends on unnamed cues", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Novices can copy visible action while missing the tacit judgment that selects and adapts it.", "role_mapping": "Visible actions -> explicit behavior; judgment -> implicit knowledge.", "slug": "implicit_knowledge", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b067_a11_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The expert’s visible actions are available, but the hidden attention structure is not. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Novices copy visible actions but miss judgment.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Novices copy visible actions but miss judgment", "The expert’s visible actions are available, but the hidden attention structure is not."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Implicit Knowledge", "one_liner": "Unconscious understanding.", "page_ref": "prime:implicit_knowledge", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Visible actions -> explicit behavior; judgment -> implicit knowledge.", "slug": "implicit_knowledge", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Novices can copy visible action while missing the tacit judgment that selects and adapts it."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Novices copy visible actions but miss judgment", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Documentation can be propositionally correct yet omit practical tacit know-how.", "role_mapping": "Documentation -> explicit knowledge; insufficient practice -> tacit gap.", "slug": "implicit_knowledge", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b067_a11_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Existing documentation is technically correct but practically insufficient. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Existing documentation is technically correct but practically insufficient"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Implicit Knowledge", "one_liner": "Unconscious understanding.", "page_ref": "prime:implicit_knowledge", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Documentation -> explicit knowledge; insufficient practice -> tacit gap.", "slug": "implicit_knowledge", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Documentation can be propositionally correct yet omit practical tacit know-how."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Existing documentation is technically correct but practically insufficient", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A gap between written procedure and work as practiced exposes uncodified knowledge.", "role_mapping": "Written process -> explicit rule; actual practice -> tacit adaptation.", "slug": "implicit_knowledge", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b067_a11_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially relevant when a team faces succession risk, inconsistent training, key-person dependency, safety-sensitive handoff, process improvement, automation design, or a gap between formal procedure and real practice. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Incident reviews show a gap between written process and real practice.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Incident reviews show a gap between written process and real practice", "It is especially relevant when a team faces succession risk, inconsistent training, key-person dependency, safety-sensitive handoff, process improvement, automation design, or a gap between formal procedure and real practice."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Implicit Knowledge", "one_liner": "Unconscious understanding.", "page_ref": "prime:implicit_knowledge", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Written process -> explicit rule; actual practice -> tacit adaptation.", "slug": "implicit_knowledge", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A gap between written procedure and work as practiced exposes uncodified knowledge."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Incident reviews show a gap between written process and real practice", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Automation requires implicit human judgment to become inspectable and representable.", "role_mapping": "Human judgment -> tacit rule; decision support -> explicit model.", "slug": "implicit_knowledge", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b067_a11_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The intervention must make enough of the knowledge explicit to support transfer and improvement without pretending that every useful judgment can be fully reduced to a rule. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Automation or decision support requires human judgment to be made inspectable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Automation or decision support requires human judgment to be made inspectable", "The intervention must make enough of the knowledge explicit to support transfer and improvement without pretending that every useful judgment can be fully reduced to a rule."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Implicit Knowledge", "one_liner": "Unconscious understanding.", "page_ref": "prime:implicit_knowledge", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Human judgment -> tacit rule; decision support -> explicit model.", "slug": "implicit_knowledge", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Automation requires implicit human judgment to become inspectable and representable."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Automation or decision support requires human judgment to be made inspectable", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The claim that experts simply know how marks knowledge that has not been elicited.", "role_mapping": "Expert routine -> tacit competence; blocked improvement -> opacity.", "slug": "implicit_knowledge", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b067_a11_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use it when experts say things like “you will know it when you see it,” “that is just experience,” “it depends,” or “the manual is right, but not complete.” Those phrases often signal that real knowledge exists but is compressed into practice. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Process improvement is blocked by \"that is just how experts do it\".", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Process improvement is blocked by \"that is just how experts do it\"", "Use it when experts say things like “you will know it when you see it,” “that is just experience,” “it depends,” or “the manual is right, but not complete.” Those phrases often signal that real knowledge exists but is compressed into practice."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Implicit Knowledge", "one_liner": "Unconscious understanding.", "page_ref": "prime:implicit_knowledge", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Expert routine -> tacit competence; blocked improvement -> opacity.", "slug": "implicit_knowledge", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The claim that experts simply know how marks knowledge that has not been elicited."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Process improvement is blocked by \"that is just how experts do it\"", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Transfer depends on a vulnerable person or small group.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "If valuable know-how lives only in a person or informal group, the organization cannot inspect it, transfer it, improve it, or challenge it. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Transfer depends on a vulnerable person or small group. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Transfer depends on a vulnerable person or small group", "If valuable know-how lives only in a person or informal group, the organization cannot inspect it, transfer it, improve it, or challenge it."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "Transfer depends on a vulnerable person or small group"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 67, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-067", "ledger_sha256": "fb71600acf9587d78ee661dc294e40695b7aa2e8b2ccdbf1519cc4d3eb5b98e0"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Tail-Dominance Modeling and Control", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:tail_dominance_modeling_and_control", "slug": "tail_dominance_modeling_and_control"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 5, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system uses typical-case, average-case, normal, or finite-variance reasoning for a quantity whose aggregate behavior is materially shaped by rare, very large observations.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system uses typical-case, average-case, normal, or finite-variance reasoning for a quantity whose aggregate behavior is materially shaped by rare, very large observations."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A heavy-tailed distribution concentrates a large share of mass or impact in a small fraction of extreme cases.", "role_mapping": "Small fraction -> tail; total contribution -> dominated aggregate.", "slug": "heavy_tailed_distributions", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b067_a12_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A small fraction of cases, events, users, losses, files, species, locations, requests, publications, or failures contributes a large share of the total. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A small fraction of cases, events, users, losses, files, species, locations, requests, publications, or failures contributes a large share of the total."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Heavy-Tailed Distributions", "one_liner": "Distributions where rare, extreme events carry most of the weight.", "page_ref": "prime:heavy_tailed_distributions", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Small fraction -> tail; total contribution -> dominated aggregate.", "slug": "heavy_tailed_distributions", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A heavy-tailed distribution concentrates a large share of mass or impact in a small fraction of extreme cases."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A small fraction of cases, events, users, losses, files, species, locations, requests, publications, or failures contributes a large share of the total.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Successive extremes keep changing estimates because tail convergence is slow and unstable.", "role_mapping": "Worst cases -> order statistics; estimate -> tail parameter.", "slug": "heavy_tailed_distributions", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b067_a12_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The worst observed cases keep changing the estimate, budget, capacity requirement, or policy conclusion. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The worst observed cases keep changing the estimate, budget, capacity requirement, or policy conclusion."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Heavy-Tailed Distributions", "one_liner": "Distributions where rare, extreme events carry most of the weight.", "page_ref": "prime:heavy_tailed_distributions", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Worst cases -> order statistics; estimate -> tail parameter.", "slug": "heavy_tailed_distributions", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Successive extremes keep changing estimates because tail convergence is slow and unstable."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The worst observed cases keep changing the estimate, budget, capacity requirement, or policy conclusion.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Fat-tail, long-tail, power-law, and bursty behavior are direct instances.", "role_mapping": "Domain behavior -> tail form.", "slug": "heavy_tailed_distributions", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b067_a12_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The domain has known long-tail, fat-tail, power-law, bursty, catastrophic, or high-impact low-probability behavior. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The domain has known long-tail, fat-tail, power-law, bursty, catastrophic, or high-impact low-probability behavior."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Heavy-Tailed Distributions", "one_liner": "Distributions where rare, extreme events carry most of the weight.", "page_ref": "prime:heavy_tailed_distributions", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Domain behavior -> tail form.", "slug": "heavy_tailed_distributions", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Fat-tail, long-tail, power-law, and bursty behavior are direct instances."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The domain has known long-tail, fat-tail, power-law, bursty, catastrophic, or high-impact low-probability behavior.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Rare extremes are systematically underobserved by finite, censored, or truncated samples.", "role_mapping": "Sampling -> observed body; extreme events -> missed tail.", "slug": "heavy_tailed_distributions", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b067_a12_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Ordinary sampling, logging, or reporting underobserves the tail because extreme events are rare, censored, truncated, filtered, or delayed. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Ordinary sampling, logging, or reporting underobserves the tail because extreme events are rare, censored, truncated, filtered, or delayed."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Heavy-Tailed Distributions", "one_liner": "Distributions where rare, extreme events carry most of the weight.", "page_ref": "prime:heavy_tailed_distributions", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Sampling -> observed body; extreme events -> missed tail.", "slug": "heavy_tailed_distributions", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Rare extremes are systematically underobserved by finite, censored, or truncated samples."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Ordinary sampling, logging, or reporting underobserves the tail because extreme events are rare, censored, truncated, filtered, or delayed.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Statistical inference can use robust nonnormal models.", "slug": "statistical_inference"}], "residual_id": "r:tail_dominance_modeling_and_control:b067_a12_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b067_a12_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system uses typical-case, average-case, normal, or finite-variance reasoning for a quantity whose aggregate behavior is materially shaped by rare, very large observations. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Averages, standard deviations, normal confidence intervals, or expected values drive decisions without checking whether their assumptions hold.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Averages, standard deviations, normal confidence intervals, or expected values drive decisions without checking whether their assumptions hold.", "A system uses typical-case, average-case, normal, or finite-variance reasoning for a quantity whose aggregate behavior is materially shaped by rare, very large observations."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Statistical inference can use robust nonnormal models.", "slug": "statistical_inference"}], "normalized_requirement": "Averages, standard deviations, normal confidence intervals, or expected values drive decisions without checking whether their assumptions hold.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Averages, standard deviations, normal confidence intervals, or expected values drive decisions without checking whether their assumptions hold.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "One tail realization can dominate totals and exhaust finite capacity.", "role_mapping": "Extreme realization -> tail event; budget or service -> aggregate exposure.", "slug": "heavy_tailed_distributions", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b067_a12_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: One extreme realization can exhaust a budget, break a service level, invalidate a forecast, dominate a portfolio, or cause irreversible harm. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["One extreme realization can exhaust a budget, break a service level, invalidate a forecast, dominate a portfolio, or cause irreversible harm."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Heavy-Tailed Distributions", "one_liner": "Distributions where rare, extreme events carry most of the weight.", "page_ref": "prime:heavy_tailed_distributions", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Extreme realization -> tail event; budget or service -> aggregate exposure.", "slug": "heavy_tailed_distributions", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "One tail realization can dominate totals and exhaust finite capacity."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "One extreme realization can exhaust a budget, break a service level, invalidate a forecast, dominate a portfolio, or cause irreversible harm.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 67, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-067", "ledger_sha256": "fb71600acf9587d78ee661dc294e40695b7aa2e8b2ccdbf1519cc4d3eb5b98e0"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Tail-Risk Preservation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:tail_risk_preservation", "slug": "tail_risk_preservation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 2, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Focus and simplification work by making some things less central. The structural problem arises when the things pushed out of focus are rare but still important. A system may improve its average metric, throughput, cost profile, or clarity while quietly worsening outcomes for rare severe cases, low-volume populations, unusual configurations, or emerging risks.\n\nThis creates a tension: the system needs focus to avoid wasting resources, but the same focus can create ethical, safety, legal, resilience, or strategic failures if it treats frequency as the only measure of importance.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system improves aggregate performance by focusing on dominant drivers, common cases, or high-volume categories, but rare, low-frequency, dispersed, or low-contribution cases remain important enough that neglect would create severe, unfair, irreversible, strategic, or mission-critical harm."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P103-C05", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve an allocation process and a rule favoring common or high-volume cases.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A process allocates attention, support, or resources using a dominant-driver or common-case optimization rule.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a distinct low-volume or tail-category role within the same target space.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The process also encounters low-volume categories.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must make the optimization rule causal for reduced priority rather than merely coexist with it.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The common-case rule causes the low-volume categories to be deprioritized.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "A common-case optimization process deprioritizes low-volume categories through Pareto focus, simplification, standardization, automation, triage, or an equivalent common-case rule.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "common-case optimization deprioritizes low-volume categories", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P103-C05-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A heavy tail can receive disproportionate attention rather than neglect.", "slug": "heavy_tailed_distributions"}], "residual_id": "r:tail_risk_preservation:b067_a13_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b067_a13_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This can happen after Pareto Focus, process simplification, automation, standardization, triage, minimum-sufficient scoping, or common-case service design. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A Pareto-style focus, simplification, standardization, automation, triage rule, or common-case process deprioritizes low-volume categories.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A Pareto-style focus, simplification, standardization, automation, triage rule, or common-case process deprioritizes low-volume categories.", "This can happen after Pareto Focus, process simplification, automation, standardization, triage, minimum-sufficient scoping, or common-case service design."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "If the minority is not operationally important, the record says the failure may not bite; where class imbalance applies, however, the majority-dominated objective still directly deprioritizes the rare class.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Class Imbalance", "one_liner": "Diagnose why a 99%-accurate classifier can be useless: when one class vastly outnumbers the class of interest, additive loss aggregation lets majority examples dominate the gradient, so the model learns to ignore the rare minority.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:class_imbalance", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "class_imbalance"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "class_imbalance", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P103-C05-U1", "why_it_fits": "Class imbalance is a direct machine-learning instance of common-case optimization deprioritizing a low-volume category."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A Pareto-style focus, simplification, standardization, automation, triage rule, or common-case process deprioritizes low-volume categories.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Risk can be frequent and mild rather than rare and severe.", "slug": "risk"}], "residual_id": "r:tail_risk_preservation:b067_a13_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b067_a13_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The archetype is most useful when rare cases are low-frequency but high-consequence: rare diseases, safety-critical failure modes, unusual eligibility cases, niche but critical product configurations, small geographies, accessibility needs, protected groups, emerging risks, or low-volume cases that carry mission obligations. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The long tail contains rare but severe cases, legally or ethically important cases, marginalized groups, emerging risks, niche users, or mission obligations.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The long tail contains rare but severe cases, legally or ethically important cases, marginalized groups, emerging risks, niche users, or mission obligations.", "The archetype is most useful when rare cases are low-frequency but high-consequence: rare diseases, safety-critical failure modes, unusual eligibility cases, niche but critical product configurations, small geographies, accessibility needs, protected groups, emerging risks, or low-volume cases that carry mission obligations."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Risk can be frequent and mild rather than rare and severe.", "slug": "risk"}], "normalized_requirement": "The long tail contains rare but severe cases, legally or ethically important cases, marginalized groups, emerging risks, niche users, or mission obligations.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The long tail contains rare but severe cases, legally or ethically important cases, marginalized groups, emerging risks, niche users, or mission obligations.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P103-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve positive movement in an aggregate measure rather than aggregate decline or stasis.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An aggregate performance metric improves.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve identifiable tail cases rather than only an abstract distribution.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Specific low-frequency, difficult, or tail cases remain within the affected population.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires loss of case-level visibility.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The tail cases become invisible to the system or its reporting.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires withdrawal or absence of needed support.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The tail cases become unsupported.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires worse timeliness for the tail cases.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The tail cases become delayed.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires removal from access, eligibility, service, or consideration.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The tail cases become excluded.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Aggregate metrics improve while specific tail cases become invisible, unsupported, delayed, or excluded.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "aggregate improvement coincides with deterioration for specific tail cases", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P103-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Tail-aware aggregate reporting can remain visible.", "slug": "heavy_tailed_distributions"}], "residual_id": "r:tail_risk_preservation:b067_a13_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b067_a13_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "If the tail cases are merely low-volume and low-stakes, ordinary deprioritization may be acceptable. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Aggregate metrics improve while specific tail cases become invisible, unsupported, delayed, or excluded.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Aggregate metrics improve while specific tail cases become invisible, unsupported, delayed, or excluded.", "If the tail cases are merely low-volume and low-stakes, ordinary deprioritization may be acceptable."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "With class imbalance and improved aggregate accuracy fixed, the rare minority remains ignored while the headline measure rises; other deterioration branches can fail without affecting the selected invisibility branch.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Class Imbalance", "one_liner": "Diagnose why a 99%-accurate classifier can be useless: when one class vastly outnumbers the class of interest, additive loss aggregation lets majority examples dominate the gradient, so the model learns to ignore the rare minority.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:class_imbalance", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1"], "guard_type": "TIMING_BINDING", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "aggregate_accuracy_improved_from_prior", "predicate": "The classifier’s aggregate accuracy has improved relative to its prior measured result.", "rationale": "The timing guard is one comparison on the candidate's existing headline accuracy metric and does not add a role, tail population, or failure relation."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "class_imbalance"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The classifier’s aggregate accuracy has improved relative to its prior measured result."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "class_imbalance", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P103-C06-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact DSA supplies the aggregate-versus-tail divergence. One atomic temporal comparison supplies positive improvement rather than merely high accuracy."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Tail duration and exact fraction may vary, but an instance cannot retain this DSA while its nominal metric fully measures the tail; that would remove the saturating-metric trap.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Ninety-Ninety Rule", "one_liner": "The first 90 percent of the code takes the first 90 percent of the time and the last 10 percent takes the other 90 percent — a deadpan warning that nominal-progress metrics measure only the estimable bulk-work population and never the non-parallelizable, heavy-tailed completion tail.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:ninety_ninety_rule", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "ninety_ninety_rule"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "ninety_ninety_rule", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P103-C06-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact rule directly entails an improved aggregate progress reading while a defined tail population remains unmeasured, completing the invisibility branch."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Aggregate metrics improve while specific tail cases become invisible, unsupported, delayed, or excluded.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Retention uncertainty does not entail scarce service capacity or rare-case obligations.", "slug": "retention_under_removal_uncertainty"}], "residual_id": "r:tail_risk_preservation:b067_a13_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b067_a13_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "If every case is unique and high-stakes, the deeper problem may be that a common-case rule is inappropriate. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The system cannot afford full equal treatment for every tail case but also cannot ethically, legally, strategically, or safely abandon the critical tail.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The system cannot afford full equal treatment for every tail case but also cannot ethically, legally, strategically, or safely abandon the critical tail.", "If every case is unique and high-stakes, the deeper problem may be that a common-case rule is inappropriate."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Retention uncertainty does not entail scarce service capacity or rare-case obligations.", "slug": "retention_under_removal_uncertainty"}], "normalized_requirement": "The system cannot afford full equal treatment for every tail case but also cannot ethically, legally, strategically, or safely abandon the critical tail.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The system cannot afford full equal treatment for every tail case but also cannot ethically, legally, strategically, or safely abandon the critical tail.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Decision-makers need to preserve focus while preventing tail neglect from becoming hidden harm.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system improves aggregate performance by focusing on dominant drivers, common cases, or high-volume categories, but rare, low-frequency, dispersed, or low-contribution cases remain important enough that neglect would create severe, unfair, irreversible, strategic, or mission-critical harm. In this archetype, the relevant goal is: Decision-makers need to preserve focus while preventing tail neglect from becoming hidden harm. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Decision-makers need to preserve focus while preventing tail neglect from becoming hidden harm.", "A system improves aggregate performance by focusing on dominant drivers, common cases, or high-volume categories, but rare, low-frequency, dispersed, or low-contribution cases remain important enough that neglect would create severe, unfair, irreversible, strategic, or mission-critical harm."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Decision-makers need to preserve focus while preventing tail neglect from becoming hidden harm."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 67, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-067", "ledger_sha256": "fb71600acf9587d78ee661dc294e40695b7aa2e8b2ccdbf1519cc4d3eb5b98e0"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Tapering Strategy", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:tapering_strategy", "slug": "tapering_strategy"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 5, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a false binary. A system keeps an input at full intensity because immediate cancellation seems dangerous, or it cuts too quickly because continuation seems wasteful. Both moves can be wrong. The input may be less valuable at full strength but still important enough that removal must be staged.\n\nThis often happens when a temporary emergency measure becomes normal, when support creates capability but also dependency, when high training load stops producing improvement, when surge capacity is no longer fully needed, or when a treatment/support level has served its purpose but cannot safely disappear overnight.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system continues receiving an input at full intensity even though the next units produce less useful benefit, because the available alternative appears to be abrupt stopping. That binary choice hides a transition problem: the system may depend on the input, may rebound when it is removed, or may need time and substitute capacity to stabilize at a lower level."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Fading applies to an ongoing repeated support or input that can be progressively withdrawn.", "role_mapping": "Ongoing input -> support; taper -> fading schedule.", "slug": "fading", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b067_a14_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "That binary choice hides a transition problem: the system may depend on the input, may rebound when it is removed, or may need time and substitute capacity to stabilize at a lower level. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The input is ongoing or repeated rather than a one-time action.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The input is ongoing or repeated rather than a one-time action.", "That binary choice hides a transition problem: the system may depend on the input, may rebound when it is removed, or may need time and substitute capacity to stabilize at a lower level."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Fading", "one_liner": "Gradual withdrawal of instructional support as competence grows.", "page_ref": "prime:fading", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Ongoing input -> support; taper -> fading schedule.", "slug": "fading", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Fading applies to an ongoing repeated support or input that can be progressively withdrawn."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The input is ongoing or repeated rather than a one-time action.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Declining marginal benefit means each additional unit of full-intensity input yields less gain.", "role_mapping": "Input intensity -> increments; benefit -> diminishing return.", "slug": "diminishing_incremental_gains", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b067_a14_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The case for tapering requires declining full-intensity benefit plus credible abrupt-withdrawal risk. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Full-intensity continuation has declining marginal benefit.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Full-intensity continuation has declining marginal benefit.", "The case for tapering requires declining full-intensity benefit plus credible abrupt-withdrawal risk."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Diminishing Incremental Gains", "one_liner": "Reduced benefit per unit.", "page_ref": "prime:diminishing_incremental_gains", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Input intensity -> increments; benefit -> diminishing return.", "slug": "diminishing_incremental_gains", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Declining marginal benefit means each additional unit of full-intensity input yields less gain."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Full-intensity continuation has declining marginal benefit.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Gradual fading is required when abrupt removal would disrupt performance or create risk.", "role_mapping": "Abrupt cessation -> withdrawal; material risk -> need for taper.", "slug": "fading", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b067_a14_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The case for tapering requires declining full-intensity benefit plus credible abrupt-withdrawal risk. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Abrupt cessation or a large cut would create material risk.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Abrupt cessation or a large cut would create material risk.", "The case for tapering requires declining full-intensity benefit plus credible abrupt-withdrawal risk."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Fading", "one_liner": "Gradual withdrawal of instructional support as competence grows.", "page_ref": "prime:fading", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Abrupt cessation -> withdrawal; material risk -> need for taper.", "slug": "fading", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Gradual fading is required when abrupt removal would disrupt performance or create risk."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Abrupt cessation or a large cut would create material risk.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Stepwise fading requires observing response after each reduction before continuing.", "role_mapping": "Reduction step -> fade stage; observed response -> progression evidence.", "slug": "fading", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b067_a14_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The system can observe response after each reduction step. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The system can observe response after each reduction step."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Fading", "one_liner": "Gradual withdrawal of instructional support as competence grows.", "page_ref": "prime:fading", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Reduction step -> fade stage; observed response -> progression evidence.", "slug": "fading", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Stepwise fading requires observing response after each reduction before continuing."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The system can observe response after each reduction step.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The endpoint is reduced maintenance support, transfer, or complete independent performance.", "role_mapping": "Lower level or exit -> fade endpoint.", "slug": "fading", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b067_a14_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "That binary choice hides a transition problem: the system may depend on the input, may rebound when it is removed, or may need time and substitute capacity to stabilize at a lower level. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A lower maintenance level, transfer path, or full exit is plausible.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A lower maintenance level, transfer path, or full exit is plausible.", "That binary choice hides a transition problem: the system may depend on the input, may rebound when it is removed, or may need time and substitute capacity to stabilize at a lower level."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Fading", "one_liner": "Gradual withdrawal of instructional support as competence grows.", "page_ref": "prime:fading", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Lower level or exit -> fade endpoint.", "slug": "fading", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The endpoint is reduced maintenance support, transfer, or complete independent performance."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A lower maintenance level, transfer path, or full exit is plausible.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Fallback or re-escalation is allowed under defined conditions.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this deployment constraint: Fallback or re-escalation is allowed under defined conditions. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Fallback or re-escalation is allowed under defined conditions."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Fallback or re-escalation is allowed under defined conditions."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 67, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-067", "ledger_sha256": "fb71600acf9587d78ee661dc294e40695b7aa2e8b2ccdbf1519cc4d3eb5b98e0"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Target-Complete Mapping Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:target_complete_mapping_design", "slug": "target_complete_mapping_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A declared target space contains elements with no valid source-side preimage, route, implementation, capability, provider, or evidence witness, yet aggregate activity, source-side inventories, or incomplete traceability make the gaps difficult to see.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A declared target space contains elements with no valid source-side preimage, route, implementation, capability, provider, or evidence witness, yet aggregate activity, source-side inventories, or incomplete traceability make the gaps difficult to see."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Surjectivity requires every element of the target set to be hit by at least one source.", "role_mapping": "Outputs or obligations -> codomain; complete coverage -> surjective map.", "slug": "surjectivity", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b067_a15_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A bounded set of outputs, requirements, states, populations, cases, competencies, services, or obligations is intended to be completely covered. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A bounded set of outputs, requirements, states, populations, cases, competencies, services, or obligations is intended to be completely covered."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Surjectivity", "one_liner": "A coverage-guaranteeing mapping in which every element of the target is hit by some input, leaving no gap in the codomain.", "page_ref": "prime:surjectivity", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Outputs or obligations -> codomain; complete coverage -> surjective map.", "slug": "surjectivity", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Surjectivity requires every element of the target set to be hit by at least one source."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A bounded set of outputs, requirements, states, populations, cases, competencies, services, or obligations is intended to be completely covered.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A large source domain does not imply surjectivity; each target still needs a preimage.", "role_mapping": "Sources -> domain; targets -> codomain; hit -> image.", "slug": "surjectivity", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b067_a15_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Source-side efficiency favors concentrating on common or easy targets, while a target-side completeness promise requires at least one credible path to every included target, including rare, expensive, inconvenient, or politically weak cases. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Sources can each cover one or more targets, but source abundance does not guarantee that every target is hit.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Sources can each cover one or more targets, but source abundance does not guarantee that every target is hit.", "Source-side efficiency favors concentrating on common or easy targets, while a target-side completeness promise requires at least one credible path to every included target, including rare, expensive, inconvenient, or politically weak cases."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Surjectivity", "one_liner": "A coverage-guaranteeing mapping in which every element of the target is hit by some input, leaving no gap in the codomain.", "page_ref": "prime:surjectivity", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Sources -> domain; targets -> codomain; hit -> image.", "slug": "surjectivity", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A large source domain does not imply surjectivity; each target still needs a preimage."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Sources can each cover one or more targets, but source abundance does not guarantee that every target is hit.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P103-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a source-to-target coverage relation and an earlier coverage state.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A source-side capability or route provides coverage for members of a declared target space.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve later change relative to an earlier coverage claim.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The relevant target membership or source capability changes after the prior coverage state was established.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve possible loss of coverage rather than a change guaranteed to leave coverage intact.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The change can invalidate the prior coverage.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve silent invalidation rather than immediate, explicit recomputation.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The invalidation can occur without becoming visible in the existing coverage account.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires addition, removal, or redefinition of target members.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Membership in the target space changes.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires degradation, removal, or alteration of a source route, implementation, provider, or witness.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The source-side capability changes.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A change in target membership or source capability can silently invalidate previously valid coverage.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "target-space or source-capability change can silently invalidate prior coverage", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P103-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Coverage can be recomputed immediately after membership changes.", "slug": "coverage_reachability"}], "residual_id": "r:target_complete_mapping_design:b067_a15_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b067_a15_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A declared target space contains elements with no valid source-side preimage, route, implementation, capability, provider, or evidence witness, yet aggregate activity, source-side inventories, or incomplete traceability make the gaps difficult to see. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Target membership or source capability changes over time and can silently invalidate prior coverage.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Target membership or source capability changes over time and can silently invalidate prior coverage.", "A declared target space contains elements with no valid source-side preimage, route, implementation, capability, provider, or evidence witness, yet aggregate activity, source-side inventories, or incomplete traceability make the gaps difficult to see."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Coverage can be recomputed immediately after membership changes.", "slug": "coverage_reachability"}], "normalized_requirement": "Target membership or source capability changes over time and can silently invalidate prior coverage.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Target membership or source capability changes over time and can silently invalidate prior coverage.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Mathematical surjectivity can treat links as valid without operational constraints.", "slug": "surjectivity"}], "residual_id": "r:target_complete_mapping_design:b067_a15_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b067_a15_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Nominal links may fail under capacity, authorization, access, timing, quality, or operating-condition constraints. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Nominal links may fail under capacity, authorization, access, timing, quality, or operating-condition constraints."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Mathematical surjectivity can treat links as valid without operational constraints.", "slug": "surjectivity"}], "normalized_requirement": "Nominal links may fail under capacity, authorization, access, timing, quality, or operating-condition constraints.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Nominal links may fail under capacity, authorization, access, timing, quality, or operating-condition constraints.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P103-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a reporting actor, a coverage claim, and a target population.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An organization reports coverage over a declared target space.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a low-frequency or hard-to-cover subset rather than uniformly covered targets.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Some targets are difficult or rare relative to the bulk of the target space.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve target-level invisibility alongside the aggregate coverage claim without requiring a causal relation between them.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The difficult or rare targets remain invisible while the aggregate coverage is reported.", "type": "POLARITY"}], "predicate": "An organization reports aggregate coverage while difficult or rare targets remain invisible.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "aggregate coverage is reported while hard-to-cover targets remain invisible", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P103-C08-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Coverage analysis can explicitly enumerate every rare target.", "slug": "coverage_reachability"}], "residual_id": "r:target_complete_mapping_design:b067_a15_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b067_a15_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A declared target space contains elements with no valid source-side preimage, route, implementation, capability, provider, or evidence witness, yet aggregate activity, source-side inventories, or incomplete traceability make the gaps difficult to see. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The organization reports aggregate coverage while difficult or rare targets remain invisible.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The organization reports aggregate coverage while difficult or rare targets remain invisible.", "A declared target space contains elements with no valid source-side preimage, route, implementation, capability, provider, or evidence witness, yet aggregate activity, source-side inventories, or incomplete traceability make the gaps difficult to see."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Coverage analysis can explicitly enumerate every rare target.", "slug": "coverage_reachability"}], "normalized_requirement": "The organization reports aggregate coverage while difficult or rare targets remain invisible.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The organization reports aggregate coverage while difficult or rare targets remain invisible.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A missed target creates material failure, exclusion, invalid claims, unreachable states, orphan requirements, or unhandled cases.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Source-side efficiency favors concentrating on common or easy targets, while a target-side completeness promise requires at least one credible path to every included target, including rare, expensive, inconvenient, or politically weak cases. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: A missed target creates material failure, exclusion, invalid claims, unreachable states, orphan requirements, or unhandled cases. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A missed target creates material failure, exclusion, invalid claims, unreachable states, orphan requirements, or unhandled cases.", "Source-side efficiency favors concentrating on common or easy targets, while a target-side completeness promise requires at least one credible path to every included target, including rare, expensive, inconvenient, or politically weak cases."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "A missed target creates material failure, exclusion, invalid claims, unreachable states, orphan requirements, or unhandled cases."}, {"display_text": "Several teams own sources, while no actor owns the target-side completeness invariant.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Source-side efficiency favors concentrating on common or easy targets, while a target-side completeness promise requires at least one credible path to every included target, including rare, expensive, inconvenient, or politically weak cases. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Several teams own sources, while no actor owns the target-side completeness invariant. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Several teams own sources, while no actor owns the target-side completeness invariant.", "Source-side efficiency favors concentrating on common or easy targets, while a target-side completeness promise requires at least one credible path to every included target, including rare, expensive, inconvenient, or politically weak cases."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "Several teams own sources, while no actor owns the target-side completeness invariant."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 67, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-067", "ledger_sha256": "fb71600acf9587d78ee661dc294e40695b7aa2e8b2ccdbf1519cc4d3eb5b98e0"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Task Interdependence Mapping", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:task_interdependence_mapping", "slug": "task_interdependence_mapping"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 5, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Specialization divides work into tasks, but outcomes require those tasks to recombine. When the system sees only task ownership or due dates, it misses the dependency structure that determines coordination need. A task may depend on another task's output, decision, timing, shared resource, information, quality threshold, or feedback. If those dependencies are implicit, the system discovers them through delay, rework, conflict, or failure.\n\nThe structural tension is that coordination is costly, but under-coordination is also costly. The goal is not to coordinate everything with everything; it is to coordinate the dependencies whose failure would matter.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Task outputs, timing, resources, or decisions depend on other tasks, but coordination mechanisms do not reflect those dependencies."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Task interdependence means one task's output changes another task's feasibility, timing, quality, or risk.", "role_mapping": "Tasks -> interdependent units; output -> dependency input.", "slug": "task_interdependence", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b068_a01_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A task may depend on another task's output, decision, timing, shared resource, information, quality threshold, or feedback. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Work is divided across roles, teams, stages, vendors, jurisdictions, or disciplines, and the output of one task affects the feasibility, timing, quality, or risk of another.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Work is divided across roles, teams, stages, vendors, jurisdictions, or disciplines, and the output of\none task affects the feasibility, timing, quality, or risk of another.", "A task may depend on another task's output, decision, timing, shared resource, information, quality threshold, or feedback."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Task Interdependence", "one_liner": "Tasks rely on each other.", "page_ref": "prime:task_interdependence", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Tasks -> interdependent units; output -> dependency input.", "slug": "task_interdependence", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Task interdependence means one task's output changes another task's feasibility, timing, quality, or risk."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Work is divided across roles, teams, stages, vendors, jurisdictions, or disciplines, and the output of\none task affects the feasibility, timing, quality, or risk of another.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime contradicts plans that model dependent or reciprocal tasks as parallel independent work.", "role_mapping": "Planned independence -> false assumption; prior work -> dependency.", "slug": "task_interdependence", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b068_a01_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Task outputs, timing, resources, or decisions depend on other tasks, but coordination mechanisms do not. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Plans treat tasks as parallel or independent even though completion, quality, or decisions depend on prior or reciprocal work.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Plans treat tasks as parallel or independent even though completion, quality, or decisions depend on prior or reciprocal work.", "Task outputs, timing, resources, or decisions depend on other tasks, but coordination mechanisms do not"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Task Interdependence", "one_liner": "Tasks rely on each other.", "page_ref": "prime:task_interdependence", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Planned independence -> false assumption; prior work -> dependency.", "slug": "task_interdependence", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime contradicts plans that model dependent or reciprocal tasks as parallel independent work."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Plans treat tasks as parallel or independent even though completion, quality, or decisions depend on prior or reciprocal work.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Cross-boundary handoffs are direct links between interdependent tasks.", "role_mapping": "Handoff -> dependency edge; organizations -> task owners.", "slug": "task_interdependence", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b068_a01_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Common signals include blocked downstream work, late integration surprises, repeated rework at handoffs, unclear responsibility for cross-task dependencies, and meetings that consume time without surfacing the dependencies that matter. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Handoffs cross organizational, professional, technical, temporal, or geographic boundaries.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Handoffs cross organizational, professional, technical, temporal, or geographic boundaries.", "Common signals include blocked downstream work, late integration surprises, repeated rework at handoffs, unclear responsibility for cross-task dependencies, and meetings that consume time without surfacing the dependencies that matter."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Task Interdependence", "one_liner": "Tasks rely on each other.", "page_ref": "prime:task_interdependence", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Handoff -> dependency edge; organizations -> task owners.", "slug": "task_interdependence", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Cross-boundary handoffs are direct links between interdependent tasks."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Handoffs cross organizational, professional, technical, temporal, or geographic boundaries.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Unmanaged dependencies predict recurring wait, rework, and miscommunication at handoff points.", "role_mapping": "Delay or rework -> dependency failure.", "slug": "task_interdependence", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b068_a01_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "If those dependencies are implicit, the system discovers them through delay, rework, conflict, or failure. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A project or operation has recurring delay, rework, waiting, or miscommunication at predictable dependency points.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A project or operation has recurring delay, rework, waiting, or miscommunication at predictable dependency points.", "If those dependencies are implicit, the system discovers them through delay, rework, conflict, or failure."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Task Interdependence", "one_liner": "Tasks rely on each other.", "page_ref": "prime:task_interdependence", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Delay or rework -> dependency failure.", "slug": "task_interdependence", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Unmanaged dependencies predict recurring wait, rework, and miscommunication at handoff points."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A project or operation has recurring delay, rework, waiting, or miscommunication at predictable dependency points.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Coordination must be scoped to actual dependency edges rather than omitted or broadcast universally.", "role_mapping": "Hidden dependency -> sparse coordination; everyone -> overbroad coordination.", "slug": "task_interdependence", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b068_a01_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The goal is not to coordinate everything with everything; it is to coordinate the dependencies whose failure would matter. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Coordination load is either too sparse, because hidden dependencies are not managed, or too broad, because everyone is asked to coordinate about everything.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Coordination load is either too sparse, because hidden dependencies are not managed, or too broad,\nbecause everyone is asked to coordinate about everything.", "The goal is not to coordinate everything with everything; it is to coordinate the dependencies whose failure would matter."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Task Interdependence", "one_liner": "Tasks rely on each other.", "page_ref": "prime:task_interdependence", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Hidden dependency -> sparse coordination; everyone -> overbroad coordination.", "slug": "task_interdependence", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Coordination must be scoped to actual dependency edges rather than omitted or broadcast universally."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Coordination load is either too sparse, because hidden dependencies are not managed, or too broad,\nbecause everyone is asked to coordinate about everything.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The same work pattern will repeat, making a reusable dependency representation more valuable than one-off troubleshooting.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Dividing work into tasks reduces local complexity, but every dependency reintroduces system-level complexity. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The same work pattern will repeat, making a reusable dependency representation more valuable than one-off troubleshooting. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The same work pattern will repeat, making a reusable dependency representation more valuable than one-off troubleshooting.", "Dividing work into tasks reduces local complexity, but every dependency reintroduces system-level complexity."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The same work pattern will repeat, making a reusable dependency representation more valuable than one-off troubleshooting."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 68, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-068", "ledger_sha256": "e026ae7e5a38034f6b6e9fc9f31ee6f0343101d40067484e425f04c441b25cdf"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Task-Legible Feature Construction", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:task_legible_feature_construction", "slug": "task_legible_feature_construction"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A latent regularity exists in observed phenomena, but the raw representation is too noisy, sparse, high-dimensional, poorly scaled, temporally misaligned, context-free, or semantically mismatched for the downstream learner, rule, analyst, or operator to use reliably.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A latent regularity exists in observed phenomena, but the raw representation is too noisy, sparse, high-dimensional, poorly scaled, temporally misaligned, context-free, or semantically mismatched for the downstream learner, rule, analyst, or operator to use reliably."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Feature engineering begins when raw observations do not directly expose the distinction or predictive structure needed.", "role_mapping": "Raw observations -> inputs; target pattern -> engineered feature.", "slug": "feature_engineering", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b068_a02_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Raw observations are available but do not expose the distinction, prediction, anomaly, risk, pattern, or relationship that matters. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Raw observations are available but do not expose the distinction, prediction, anomaly, risk, pattern, or relationship that matters."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Feature Engineering", "one_liner": "Deliberately transforming the representation of raw observations so a latent regularity becomes legible to a downstream consumer.", "page_ref": "prime:feature_engineering", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Raw observations -> inputs; target pattern -> engineered feature.", "slug": "feature_engineering", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Feature engineering begins when raw observations do not directly expose the distinction or predictive structure needed."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Raw observations are available but do not expose the distinction, prediction, anomaly, risk, pattern, or relationship that matters.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Features are constructed to fit known downstream constraints such as scale, sparsity, linearity, latency, or interpretability.", "role_mapping": "Consumer limits -> representation requirements.", "slug": "feature_engineering", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b068_a02_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The phenomenon contains useful structure, but the observation format offered to the downstream consumer is not the representation in which that structure is easiest, safest, or most valid to use. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A downstream consumer has known representational limits: scale sensitivity, sparsity sensitivity, lack of context, linearity, interpretability, latency, or data-type constraints.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A downstream consumer has known representational limits: scale sensitivity, sparsity sensitivity, lack of context, linearity, interpretability, latency, or data-type constraints.", "The phenomenon contains useful structure, but the observation format offered to the downstream consumer is not the representation in which that structure is easiest, safest, or most valid to use."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Feature Engineering", "one_liner": "Deliberately transforming the representation of raw observations so a latent regularity becomes legible to a downstream consumer.", "page_ref": "prime:feature_engineering", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Consumer limits -> representation requirements.", "slug": "feature_engineering", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Features are constructed to fit known downstream constraints such as scale, sparsity, linearity, latency, or interpretability."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A downstream consumer has known representational limits: scale sensitivity, sparsity sensitivity, lack of context, linearity, interpretability, latency, or data-type constraints.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Input representation rather than the downstream algorithm is the defining locus of a feature-engineering problem.", "role_mapping": "Poorly shaped inputs -> feature defect; method -> downstream consumer.", "slug": "feature_engineering", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b068_a02_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A latent regularity exists in observed phenomena, but the raw representation is too noisy, sparse, high-dimensional, poorly scaled, temporally misaligned, context-free, or semantically mismatched for the downstream learner, rule, analyst, or operator to use reliably. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Existing models or rules underperform because their inputs are poorly shaped rather than because the downstream method is intrinsically inadequate.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Existing models or rules underperform because their inputs are poorly shaped rather than because the downstream method is intrinsically inadequate.", "A latent regularity exists in observed phenomena, but the raw representation is too noisy, sparse, high-dimensional, poorly scaled, temporally misaligned, context-free, or semantically mismatched for the downstream learner, rule, analyst, or operator to use reliably."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Feature Engineering", "one_liner": "Deliberately transforming the representation of raw observations so a latent regularity becomes legible to a downstream consumer.", "page_ref": "prime:feature_engineering", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Poorly shaped inputs -> feature defect; method -> downstream consumer.", "slug": "feature_engineering", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Input representation rather than the downstream algorithm is the defining locus of a feature-engineering problem."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Existing models or rules underperform because their inputs are poorly shaped rather than because the downstream method is intrinsically inadequate.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Naive features can encode leakage, shortcuts, proxies, and drift-sensitive correlations.", "role_mapping": "Naive feature -> brittle input; failure -> leakage or shortcut.", "slug": "feature_engineering", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b068_a02_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Naive features create leakage, shortcut learning, proxy discrimination, or brittle performance under drift. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Naive features create leakage, shortcut learning, proxy discrimination, or brittle performance under drift."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Feature Engineering", "one_liner": "Deliberately transforming the representation of raw observations so a latent regularity becomes legible to a downstream consumer.", "page_ref": "prime:feature_engineering", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Naive feature -> brittle input; failure -> leakage or shortcut.", "slug": "feature_engineering", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Naive features can encode leakage, shortcuts, proxies, and drift-sensitive correlations."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Naive features create leakage, shortcut learning, proxy discrimination, or brittle performance under drift.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Domain knowledge suggests that ratios, differences, lags, thresholds, interactions, encodings, normalizations, or context summaries would expose the target pattern.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: Domain knowledge suggests that ratios, differences, lags, thresholds, interactions, encodings, normalizations, or context summaries would expose the target pattern. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Domain knowledge suggests that ratios, differences, lags, thresholds, interactions, encodings, normalizations, or context summaries would expose the target pattern."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Domain knowledge suggests that ratios, differences, lags, thresholds, interactions, encodings, normalizations, or context summaries would expose the target pattern."}, {"display_text": "The same raw signal has different meanings depending on time, baseline, location, prior state, user segment, or operational context.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The same raw signal has different meanings depending on time, baseline, location, prior state, user segment, or operational context. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The same raw signal has different meanings depending on time, baseline, location, prior state, user segment, or operational context."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The same raw signal has different meanings depending on time, baseline, location, prior state, user segment, or operational context."}, {"display_text": "Stakeholders need interpretable intermediate variables rather than only opaque end-to-end predictions.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: Stakeholders need interpretable intermediate variables rather than only opaque end-to-end predictions. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders need interpretable intermediate variables rather than only opaque end-to-end predictions."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "Stakeholders need interpretable intermediate variables rather than only opaque end-to-end predictions."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 68, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-068", "ledger_sha256": "e026ae7e5a38034f6b6e9fc9f31ee6f0343101d40067484e425f04c441b25cdf"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Task-Relevant Compression", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:task_relevant_compression", "slug": "task_relevant_compression"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 1, "statement": "1 of 4 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is that the information system has more detail than the user, interface, process, memory, storage channel, or decision window can handle. The result is not necessarily ignorance; it is unusable abundance. People may have access to all the material and still be unable to identify what matters.\n\nThe opposite failure is equally common: in response to overload, someone creates a shortcut summary, metric, code, or dashboard that is compact but unsafe. It omits caveats, hides variation, severs source links, removes dissent, or makes uncertain evidence look settled. Task-Relevant Compression solves the middle problem: make information compact while preserving task value.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A person, team, system, or process has more information than it can inspect, store, communicate, remember, or use at the moment of action. Without a disciplined compression pattern, actors either drown in detail or rely on shortcuts that omit what the task actually needed."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A representational mismatch can occur in a tiny artifact.", "slug": "representational_structure_mismatch"}], "residual_id": "r:task_relevant_compression:b068_a03_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b068_a03_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when users need to act from the information but do not need every source detail at the surface. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Information is too large, repetitive, fragmented, or detailed for the intended use.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Information is too large, repetitive, fragmented, or detailed for the intended use.", "It is especially useful when users need to act from the information but do not need every source detail at the surface."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A representational mismatch can occur in a tiny artifact.", "slug": "representational_structure_mismatch"}], "normalized_requirement": "Information is too large, repetitive, fragmented, or detailed for the intended use.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Information is too large, repetitive, fragmented, or detailed for the intended use.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P103-C09", "dnf": [], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [], "predicate": "Users need a decision, action, comparison, or monitoring signal more than a complete source record.", "resolution": "SOURCE_DEFECT", "semantic_scope": "SOURCE_DEFECT", "structural_head": "users should receive a task signal rather than a complete source record", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P103-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Streetlight effects concern search visibility, not task-bounded compression.", "slug": "streetlight_effect"}], "residual_id": "r:task_relevant_compression:b068_a03_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b068_a03_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when users need to act from the information but do not need every source detail at the surface. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Users need a decision, action, comparison, or monitoring signal more than a complete source record.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Users need a decision, action, comparison, or monitoring signal more than a complete source record.", "It is especially useful when users need to act from the information but do not need every source detail at the surface."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "SOURCE_REVIEW_REQUIRED", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 1, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Streetlight effects concern search visibility, not task-bounded compression.", "slug": "streetlight_effect"}], "normalized_requirement": "Users need a decision, action, comparison, or monitoring signal more than a complete source record.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "SOURCE_REVIEW_REQUIRED", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later candidate-blind atomization found that the source wording lacks a relation required by its diagnostic reading, so this is a source-repair issue rather than evidence of a missing abstraction."}, "predicate": "Users need a decision, action, comparison, or monitoring signal more than a complete source record.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Poor structure can hide a pattern without excessive detail.", "slug": "representational_structure_mismatch"}], "residual_id": "r:task_relevant_compression:b068_a03_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b068_a03_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when users need to act from the information but do not need every source detail at the surface. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Raw detail hides the pattern, signal, or priority users need.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Raw detail hides the pattern, signal, or priority users need.", "It is especially useful when users need to act from the information but do not need every source detail at the surface."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Poor structure can hide a pattern without excessive detail.", "slug": "representational_structure_mismatch"}], "normalized_requirement": "Raw detail hides the pattern, signal, or priority users need.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Raw detail hides the pattern, signal, or priority users need.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P103-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve plural user roles and one common source record or information body.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Multiple users consume the same source material.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve need or requirement for detail level without imposing task, expertise, accessibility, role, or another specific cause.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Each user genuinely requires a level of detail rather than merely preferring it.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail a cross-user difference in representation granularity.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The users require different levels of detail.", "type": "COMPARISON"}], "predicate": "Different users require different levels of detail from the same source material.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "users require different detail levels from shared source material", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P103-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "All audiences can share the same adequate representation.", "slug": "representational_structure_mismatch"}], "residual_id": "r:task_relevant_compression:b068_a03_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b068_a03_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when users need to act from the information but do not need every source detail at the surface. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Different users need different levels of detail from the same source material.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Different users need different levels of detail from the same source material.", "It is especially useful when users need to act from the information but do not need every source detail at the surface."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A homogeneous user population would defeat the atomized claim, but it would also remove the candidate's defining heterogeneous user-readiness distribution.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Progressive-Disclosure Failure", "one_liner": "Diagnose an interface's usability breakdowns as a single mistuning between its staging schedule and the readiness of the users and tasks it actually meets, read off by whether too much is hidden or too much exposed.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:progressive_disclosure_failure", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "progressive_disclosure_failure"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "progressive_disclosure_failure", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P103-C10-U1", "why_it_fits": "Progressive-disclosure failure directly entails multiple users requiring different detail levels from the same staged material."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Different users need different levels of detail from the same source material.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The same information must be repeatedly communicated, stored, retrieved, or applied.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The same information must be repeatedly communicated, stored, retrieved, or applied. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The same information must be repeatedly communicated, stored, retrieved, or applied."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "The same information must be repeatedly communicated, stored, retrieved, or applied."}, {"display_text": "Storage, bandwidth, latency, or interface limits make full-fidelity representation impractical.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The blockage may appear as cognitive overload, slow communication, expensive storage, bandwidth limits, dashboard sprawl, repeated documentation, long reports nobody reads, or archives that are technically available but practically inaccessible. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: Storage, bandwidth, latency, or interface limits make full-fidelity representation impractical. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Storage, bandwidth, latency, or interface limits make full-fidelity representation impractical.", "The blockage may appear as cognitive overload, slow communication, expensive storage, bandwidth limits, dashboard sprawl, repeated documentation, long reports nobody reads, or archives that are technically available but practically inaccessible."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Storage, bandwidth, latency, or interface limits make full-fidelity representation impractical."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 68, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-068", "ledger_sha256": "e026ae7e5a38034f6b6e9fc9f31ee6f0343101d40067484e425f04c441b25cdf"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Technical Debt Buffering and Rework Absorption", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:technical_debt_buffering_rework_absorption", "slug": "technical_debt_buffering_rework_absorption"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 2 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 2}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A team, system, or organization faces timing, transition, learning, or capacity pressure that cannot be fully absorbed by available slack, schedule delay, or scope reduction, so unresolved quality obligations risk accumulating invisibly or blocking needed progress.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A team, system, or organization faces timing, transition, learning, or capacity pressure that cannot be fully absorbed by available slack, schedule delay, or scope reduction, so unresolved quality obligations risk accumulating invisibly or blocking needed progress."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Technical debt is created when short-term delivery defers integration, documentation, automation, or maintainability work.", "role_mapping": "Deferred quality work -> debt; early release -> short-term benefit.", "slug": "technical_debt", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b068_a04_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A team, system, or organization faces timing, transition, learning, or capacity pressure that cannot be fully absorbed by available slack, schedule delay, or scope reduction, so unresolved quality obligations risk accumulating invisibly or blocking needed progress. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A release, migration, transition, crisis, pilot, or learning cycle must proceed before all quality, integration, automation, documentation, or maintainability work can be completed.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A release, migration, transition, crisis, pilot, or learning cycle must proceed before all quality, integration, automation, documentation, or maintainability work can be completed.", "A team, system, or organization faces timing, transition, learning, or capacity pressure that cannot be fully absorbed by available slack, schedule delay, or scope reduction, so unresolved quality obligations risk accumulating invisibly or blocking needed progress."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Technical Debt", "one_liner": "A present expedient choice imposes a future cost that compounds with system growth until it is paid down, with a principal, an interest payment, and a pay-down.", "page_ref": "prime:technical_debt", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Deferred quality work -> debt; early release -> short-term benefit.", "slug": "technical_debt", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Technical debt is created when short-term delivery defers integration, documentation, automation, or maintainability work."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A release, migration, transition, crisis, pilot, or learning cycle must proceed before all quality, integration, automation, documentation, or maintainability work can be completed.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Reversible work can still spread and compound beyond containment.", "slug": "reversibility_and_irreversibility"}], "residual_id": "r:technical_debt_buffering_rework_absorption:b068_a04_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b068_a04_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Fast movement can preserve option value and continuity, but deferred quality work compounds when the system has no explicit buffer limit, repayment reserve, or protected cleanup path. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The deferred work is costly but reversible, containable, and observable enough to be repaid later.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The deferred work is costly but reversible, containable, and observable enough to be repaid later.", "Fast movement can preserve option value and continuity, but deferred quality work compounds when the system has no explicit buffer limit, repayment reserve, or protected cleanup path."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Reversible work can still spread and compound beyond containment.", "slug": "reversibility_and_irreversibility"}], "normalized_requirement": "The deferred work is costly but reversible, containable, and observable enough to be repaid later.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The deferred work is costly but reversible, containable, and observable enough to be repaid later.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Stopping the work, delaying the release, or overbuilding before learning would destroy significant option value or continuity.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Fast movement can preserve option value and continuity, but deferred quality work compounds when the system has no explicit buffer limit, repayment reserve, or protected cleanup path. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Stopping the work, delaying the release, or overbuilding before learning would destroy significant option value or continuity. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Stopping the work, delaying the release, or overbuilding before learning would destroy significant option value or continuity.", "Fast movement can preserve option value and continuity, but deferred quality work compounds when the system has no explicit buffer limit, repayment reserve, or protected cleanup path."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Stopping the work, delaying the release, or overbuilding before learning would destroy significant option value or continuity."}, {"display_text": "There is credible future capacity to repay the debt before it compounds into structural fragility.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: There is credible future capacity to repay the debt before it compounds into structural fragility. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["There is credible future capacity to repay the debt before it compounds into structural fragility."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "There is credible future capacity to repay the debt before it compounds into structural fragility."}, {"display_text": "The organization can enforce debt ceilings, repayment triggers, and exceptions rather than relying on informal promises.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: The organization can enforce debt ceilings, repayment triggers, and exceptions rather than relying on informal promises. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The organization can enforce debt ceilings, repayment triggers, and exceptions rather than relying on informal promises."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The organization can enforce debt ceilings, repayment triggers, and exceptions rather than relying on informal promises."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 68, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-068", "ledger_sha256": "e026ae7e5a38034f6b6e9fc9f31ee6f0343101d40067484e425f04c441b25cdf"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Technical Debt Containment", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:technical_debt_containment", "slug": "technical_debt_containment"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 0, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 0 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 0 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 0}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a growing stock of future obligations. Local actors choose speed, continuity, emergency response, or convenience now. Those choices defer cleanup, explanation, simplification, migration, or standardization. Over time the deferred obligations form a hidden stock: brittle dependencies, undocumented assumptions, obsolete exceptions, manual workarounds, unclear ownership, stale policies, and process exceptions.\n\nThe root tension is that shortcuts can be useful and sometimes necessary, but ungoverned shortcuts spend future capacity without making that spending explicit. The future cost appears later as rework, defects, onboarding difficulty, coordination burden, slower change, support load, compliance confusion, or loss of strategic options.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system repeatedly accepts shortcuts, exceptions, undocumented decisions, compatibility burdens, brittle workarounds, or deferred cleanup to preserve short-term speed. Over time those local choices accumulate into a stock of future obligation that consumes capacity, slows change, increases fragility, and makes the system harder to understand or repair."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [], "condition_structure": "DISJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Short term speed has been prioritized over future cleanliness.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when a system has gained short-term speed by taking shortcuts that now impose future drag. In this archetype, the relevant source condition requiring clarification is: Short term speed has been prioritized over future cleanliness. The wording is retained for source review rather than assigned a stronger semantic role.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["short_term_speed_has_been_prioritized_over_future_cleanliness", "Use this archetype when a system has gained short-term speed by taking shortcuts that now impose future drag."]}, "function": "MALFORMED", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because the source wording is not structurally clear enough to support a formal trigger role without clarification.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "short_term_speed_has_been_prioritized_over_future_cleanliness"}, {"display_text": "Future drag is hidden or underpriced.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when a system has gained short-term speed by taking shortcuts that now impose future drag. In this archetype, the relevant source condition requiring clarification is: Future drag is hidden or underpriced. The wording is retained for source review rather than assigned a stronger semantic role.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["future_drag_is_hidden_or_underpriced", "Use this archetype when a system has gained short-term speed by taking shortcuts that now impose future drag."]}, "function": "MALFORMED", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because the source wording is not structurally clear enough to support a formal trigger role without clarification.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "future_drag_is_hidden_or_underpriced"}, {"display_text": "Debt items interact or compound.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source states: Debt items interact or compound. The normalized source condition requiring clarification is: Debt items interact or compound. The wording is retained for source review rather than assigned a stronger semantic role.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["debt_items_interact_or_compound"]}, "function": "MALFORMED", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because the source wording is not structurally clear enough to support a formal trigger role without clarification.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "debt_items_interact_or_compound"}, {"display_text": "Repayment capacity is not reserved.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source states: Repayment capacity is not reserved. The normalized source condition requiring clarification is: Repayment capacity is not reserved. The wording is retained for source review rather than assigned a stronger semantic role.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["repayment_capacity_is_not_reserved"]}, "function": "MALFORMED", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because the source wording is not structurally clear enough to support a formal trigger role without clarification.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "repayment_capacity_is_not_reserved"}, {"display_text": "Ownership is diffuse.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source states: Ownership is diffuse. The normalized source condition requiring clarification is: Ownership is diffuse. The wording is retained for source review rather than assigned a stronger semantic role.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "SOURCE_CONDITION_CONTEXT", "source_texts": ["ownership_is_diffuse"]}, "function": "MALFORMED", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because the source wording is not structurally clear enough to support a formal trigger role without clarification.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "ownership_is_diffuse"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 68, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-068", "ledger_sha256": "e026ae7e5a38034f6b6e9fc9f31ee6f0343101d40067484e425f04c441b25cdf"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Teleconnection Mapping", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:teleconnection_mapping", "slug": "teleconnection_mapping"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 6, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 6, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "6 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a boundary mismatch. The local system is the place where effects are observed and decisions must be made, but the drivers sit partly outside that local frame. Because the causal boundary is too small, local actors misdiagnose symptoms, monitor lagging signals, or react after the remote driver has already propagated into local exposure.\n\nTeleconnections are also easy to overstate. Distant events can be rhetorically convenient explanations. A good map therefore distinguishes actual pathways from loose associations and separates observed evidence from plausible but unconfirmed hypotheses.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A local outcome, risk, failure, opportunity, or pattern is affected by distant events or system states that are not visible within the local boundary. Local actors therefore misdiagnose the situation, monitor the wrong signals, react too late, or optimize locally while ignoring the remote dynamics that shape their real conditions."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Teleconnection is invoked when local variation cannot be explained by local causes alone.", "role_mapping": "Local system -> receiving region; failed local explanation -> nonlocal link.", "slug": "teleconnection", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b068_a06_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when local-only explanation is too narrow. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Local-only explanations keep failing.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Local-only explanations keep failing.", "Use this archetype when local-only explanation is too narrow."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Teleconnection", "one_liner": "Distant relationships via shared dynamics.", "page_ref": "prime:teleconnection", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Local system -> receiving region; failed local explanation -> nonlocal link.", "slug": "teleconnection", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Teleconnection is invoked when local variation cannot be explained by local causes alone."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Local-only explanations keep failing.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime necessarily links a distant shock to consequences in another location.", "role_mapping": "Distant shock -> remote driver; local consequence -> linked response.", "slug": "teleconnection", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b068_a06_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A local outcome, risk, failure, opportunity, or pattern is affected by distant events or system states that are not visible within the local boundary. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A distant shock produces local consequences.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A distant shock produces local consequences.", "A local outcome, risk, failure, opportunity, or pattern is affected by distant events or system states that are not visible within the local boundary."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Teleconnection", "one_liner": "Distant relationships via shared dynamics.", "page_ref": "prime:teleconnection", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Distant shock -> remote driver; local consequence -> linked response.", "slug": "teleconnection", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime necessarily links a distant shock to consequences in another location."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A distant shock produces local consequences.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Hidden upstream, downstream, or cross-boundary dependencies carry the nonlocal relation.", "role_mapping": "Dependency -> teleconnection pathway.", "slug": "teleconnection", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b068_a06_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when remote indicators appear before local symptoms, when dependency pathways cross organizational or jurisdictional boundaries, or when a local decision could create consequences elsewhere that later feed back. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The local system has hidden upstream, downstream, or cross-boundary dependencies.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The local system has hidden upstream, downstream, or cross-boundary dependencies.", "It is especially useful when remote indicators appear before local symptoms, when dependency pathways cross organizational or jurisdictional boundaries, or when a local decision could create consequences elsewhere that later feed back."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Teleconnection", "one_liner": "Distant relationships via shared dynamics.", "page_ref": "prime:teleconnection", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Dependency -> teleconnection pathway.", "slug": "teleconnection", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Hidden upstream, downstream, or cross-boundary dependencies carry the nonlocal relation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The local system has hidden upstream, downstream, or cross-boundary dependencies.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Remote indicators can lead local symptoms because the driver originates elsewhere.", "role_mapping": "Remote indicator -> upstream signal; local symptom -> lagging response.", "slug": "teleconnection", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b068_a06_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when remote indicators appear before local symptoms, when dependency pathways cross organizational or jurisdictional boundaries, or when a local decision could create consequences elsewhere that later feed back. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Remote indicators move before local symptoms appear.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Remote indicators move before local symptoms appear.", "It is especially useful when remote indicators appear before local symptoms, when dependency pathways cross organizational or jurisdictional boundaries, or when a local decision could create consequences elsewhere that later feed back."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Teleconnection", "one_liner": "Distant relationships via shared dynamics.", "page_ref": "prime:teleconnection", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Remote indicator -> upstream signal; local symptom -> lagging response.", "slug": "teleconnection", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Remote indicators can lead local symptoms because the driver originates elsewhere."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Remote indicators move before local symptoms appear.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Effects arrive transformed, indirect, or delayed across the connecting mechanism.", "role_mapping": "Distant cause -> transformed pathway; local effect -> delayed response.", "slug": "teleconnection", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b068_a06_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Effects appear delayed, indirect, or transformed. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Effects appear delayed, indirect, or transformed."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Teleconnection", "one_liner": "Distant relationships via shared dynamics.", "page_ref": "prime:teleconnection", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Distant cause -> transformed pathway; local effect -> delayed response.", "slug": "teleconnection", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Effects arrive transformed, indirect, or delayed across the connecting mechanism."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Effects appear delayed, indirect, or transformed.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A local action can propagate remotely and return through coupled large-scale circulation.", "role_mapping": "Local action -> outgoing effect; return -> feedback teleconnection.", "slug": "teleconnection", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b068_a06_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when remote indicators appear before local symptoms, when dependency pathways cross organizational or jurisdictional boundaries, or when a local decision could create consequences elsewhere that later feed back. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A local action may create remote consequences that later return.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A local action may create remote consequences that later return.", "It is especially useful when remote indicators appear before local symptoms, when dependency pathways cross organizational or jurisdictional boundaries, or when a local decision could create consequences elsewhere that later feed back."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Teleconnection", "one_liner": "Distant relationships via shared dynamics.", "page_ref": "prime:teleconnection", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Local action -> outgoing effect; return -> feedback teleconnection.", "slug": "teleconnection", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A local action can propagate remotely and return through coupled large-scale circulation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A local action may create remote consequences that later return.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 68, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-068", "ledger_sha256": "e026ae7e5a38034f6b6e9fc9f31ee6f0343101d40067484e425f04c441b25cdf"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Tempo-Matched Response Governance", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:tempo_matched_response_governance", "slug": "tempo_matched_response_governance"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 5, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system senses, decides, approves, mobilizes, or acts on a cadence that is out of phase with the environment it must influence. Decision content may be correct and resources may be adequate, but outcomes degrade because the state being acted on has changed, the opportunity window has closed, the target is not yet ready, or the action propagates after the relevant condition has moved elsewhere.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system senses, decides, approves, mobilizes, or acts on a cadence that is out of phase with the environment it must influence. Decision content may be correct and resources may be adequate, but outcomes degrade because the state being acted on has changed, the opportunity window has closed, the target is not yet ready, or the action propagates after the relevant condition has moved elsewhere."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Tempo mismatch is exactly a difference between environmental and internal process rates.", "role_mapping": "External state -> environment tempo; internal process -> governance tempo.", "slug": "tempo_mismatch", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b068_a07_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: External state changes faster or slower than the internal process. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["External state changes faster or slower than the internal process"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Tempo Mismatch", "one_liner": "A system's pace of action is out of phase with the timescale of the environment it must respond to, so correct decisions degrade outcomes by arriving against a world that has already moved on (or one not yet ready to absorb them).", "page_ref": "prime:tempo_mismatch", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "External state -> environment tempo; internal process -> governance tempo.", "slug": "tempo_mismatch", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Tempo mismatch is exactly a difference between environmental and internal process rates."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "External state changes faster or slower than the internal process", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Nontrivial action lead time makes response cadence relative to change rate material.", "role_mapping": "Lead time -> response delay; external change -> propagation.", "slug": "tempo_mismatch", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b068_a07_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Action lead time is nontrivial. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Action lead time is nontrivial"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Tempo Mismatch", "one_liner": "A system's pace of action is out of phase with the timescale of the environment it must respond to, so correct decisions degrade outcomes by arriving against a world that has already moved on (or one not yet ready to absorb them).", "page_ref": "prime:tempo_mismatch", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Lead time -> response delay; external change -> propagation.", "slug": "tempo_mismatch", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Nontrivial action lead time makes response cadence relative to change rate material."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Action lead time is nontrivial", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "When state changes across moments, the same delayed action can have different effects.", "role_mapping": "Action timing -> phase; effect -> state-relative response.", "slug": "tempo_mismatch", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b068_a07_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The same action has different effects at different moments. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The same action has different effects at different moments"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Tempo Mismatch", "one_liner": "A system's pace of action is out of phase with the timescale of the environment it must respond to, so correct decisions degrade outcomes by arriving against a world that has already moved on (or one not yet ready to absorb them).", "page_ref": "prime:tempo_mismatch", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Action timing -> phase; effect -> state-relative response.", "slug": "tempo_mismatch", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "When state changes across moments, the same delayed action can have different effects."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The same action has different effects at different moments", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "An inherited rather than designed cadence can remain misaligned with current environmental tempo.", "role_mapping": "Inherited clock -> internal cadence; current world -> external rate.", "slug": "tempo_mismatch", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b068_a07_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Governance cadence is inherited rather than designed. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Governance cadence is inherited rather than designed"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Tempo Mismatch", "one_liner": "A system's pace of action is out of phase with the timescale of the environment it must respond to, so correct decisions degrade outcomes by arriving against a world that has already moved on (or one not yet ready to absorb them).", "page_ref": "prime:tempo_mismatch", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Inherited clock -> internal cadence; current world -> external rate.", "slug": "tempo_mismatch", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "An inherited rather than designed cadence can remain misaligned with current environmental tempo."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Governance cadence is inherited rather than designed", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Operators improvise around a clock mismatch when formal cadence cannot track events.", "role_mapping": "Improvisation -> workaround; clock mismatch -> cause.", "slug": "tempo_mismatch", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b068_a07_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Operators improvise around the clock mismatch. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Operators improvise around the clock mismatch"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Tempo Mismatch", "one_liner": "A system's pace of action is out of phase with the timescale of the environment it must respond to, so correct decisions degrade outcomes by arriving against a world that has already moved on (or one not yet ready to absorb them).", "page_ref": "prime:tempo_mismatch", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Improvisation -> workaround; clock mismatch -> cause.", "slug": "tempo_mismatch", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Operators improvise around a clock mismatch when formal cadence cannot track events."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Operators improvise around the clock mismatch", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Decision freshness matters.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Decision freshness matters. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Decision freshness matters"]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "Decision freshness matters"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 68, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-068", "ledger_sha256": "e026ae7e5a38034f6b6e9fc9f31ee6f0343101d40067484e425f04c441b25cdf"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Temporal Discounting and Present-Value Framework Selection", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:temporal_discounting_present_value_framework_selection", "slug": "temporal_discounting_present_value_framework_selection"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 5, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A decision has consequences distributed across time, but the evaluation either treats all periods as equivalent, hides the discounting assumption, truncates the horizon, or lets a single unjustified rate reverse the decision without scrutiny.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A decision has consequences distributed across time, but the evaluation either treats all periods as equivalent, hides the discounting assumption, truncates the horizon, or lets a single unjustified rate reverse the decision without scrutiny."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Present-value discounting compares costs and benefits occurring in different periods.", "role_mapping": "Years or phases -> cash-flow times; comparison -> present value.", "slug": "discounting_present_value", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b068_a08_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Costs and benefits occur in different years, phases, generations, or budget cycles. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Costs and benefits occur in different years, phases, generations, or budget cycles."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Discounting (Present Value)", "one_liner": "Present value calculation.", "page_ref": "prime:discounting_present_value", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Years or phases -> cash-flow times; comparison -> present value.", "slug": "discounting_present_value", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Present-value discounting compares costs and benefits occurring in different periods."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Costs and benefits occur in different years, phases, generations, or budget cycles.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A present cost justified by future savings or avoided harm requires converting future value to a common date.", "role_mapping": "Present expenditure -> current flow; future benefit -> discounted flow.", "slug": "discounting_present_value", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b068_a08_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Present action must be chosen now, but the value, risk, and moral weight of consequences unfold over time. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A present expenditure is justified by future savings, risk reduction, learning, resilience, revenue, or avoided harm.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A present expenditure is justified by future savings, risk reduction, learning, resilience, revenue, or avoided harm.", "Present action must be chosen now, but the value, risk, and moral weight of consequences unfold over time."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Discounting (Present Value)", "one_liner": "Present value calculation.", "page_ref": "prime:discounting_present_value", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Present expenditure -> current flow; future benefit -> discounted flow.", "slug": "discounting_present_value", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A present cost justified by future savings or avoided harm requires converting future value to a common date."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A present expenditure is justified by future savings, risk reduction, learning, resilience, revenue, or avoided harm.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Discount rate, horizon, and timing assumptions necessarily change the relative present values of short- and long-term options.", "role_mapping": "Options -> cash-flow streams; assumptions -> valuation parameters.", "slug": "discounting_present_value", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b068_a08_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A decision has consequences distributed across time, but the evaluation either treats all periods as equivalent, hides the discounting assumption, truncates the horizon, or lets a single unjustified rate reverse the decision without scrutiny. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A short-term option and long-term option look different depending on discount rate, horizon, or timing assumptions.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A short-term option and long-term option look different depending on discount rate, horizon, or timing assumptions.", "A decision has consequences distributed across time, but the evaluation either treats all periods as equivalent, hides the discounting assumption, truncates the horizon, or lets a single unjustified rate reverse the decision without scrutiny."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Discounting (Present Value)", "one_liner": "Present value calculation.", "page_ref": "prime:discounting_present_value", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Options -> cash-flow streams; assumptions -> valuation parameters.", "slug": "discounting_present_value", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Discount rate, horizon, and timing assumptions necessarily change the relative present values of short- and long-term options."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A short-term option and long-term option look different depending on discount rate, horizon, or timing assumptions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Valid present-value comparison requires consistent real, nominal, inflation, currency, and index bases.", "role_mapping": "Value bases -> units; mixed values -> invalid comparison.", "slug": "discounting_present_value", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b068_a08_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Real, nominal, inflation-adjusted, currency, or index-based values are being mixed. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Real, nominal, inflation-adjusted, currency, or index-based values are being mixed."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Discounting (Present Value)", "one_liner": "Present value calculation.", "page_ref": "prime:discounting_present_value", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Value bases -> units; mixed values -> invalid comparison.", "slug": "discounting_present_value", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Valid present-value comparison requires consistent real, nominal, inflation, currency, and index bases."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Real, nominal, inflation-adjusted, currency, or index-based values are being mixed.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Compounding discount can strongly suppress distant irreversible or intergenerational effects.", "role_mapping": "Long-horizon effect -> distant flow; ordinary discount -> low present weight.", "slug": "discounting_present_value", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b068_a08_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Long-horizon, irreversible, or intergenerational effects could be suppressed by ordinary compounding. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Long-horizon, irreversible, or intergenerational effects could be suppressed by ordinary compounding."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Discounting (Present Value)", "one_liner": "Present value calculation.", "page_ref": "prime:discounting_present_value", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Long-horizon effect -> distant flow; ordinary discount -> low present weight.", "slug": "discounting_present_value", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Compounding discount can strongly suppress distant irreversible or intergenerational effects."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Long-horizon, irreversible, or intergenerational effects could be suppressed by ordinary compounding.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Stakeholders disagree about whether the decision should prioritize near-term affordability, long-term value, or future obligations.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Stakeholders disagree about whether the decision should prioritize near-term affordability, long-term value, or future obligations. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders disagree about whether the decision should prioritize near-term affordability, long-term value, or future obligations."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Stakeholders disagree about whether the decision should prioritize near-term affordability, long-term value, or future obligations."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 68, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-068", "ledger_sha256": "e026ae7e5a38034f6b6e9fc9f31ee6f0343101d40067484e425f04c441b25cdf"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Temporal Orchestration Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:temporal_orchestration_design", "slug": "temporal_orchestration_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Static plans often model activities but not the system states that make them effective. They count effort while ignoring waiting and recovery; compress tasks while leaving feedback lag untouched; synchronize everything and create contention; overlap work before interfaces stabilize; or honor an internal deadline after the external opportunity has closed. Local punctuality can coexist with global temporal failure.\n\nThe core tension is commitment versus adaptation. Coordination needs promises, recurrence, phase relations, and bounded windows. Dynamic environments need uncertainty, slack, reversible steps, and new timing as evidence arrives. Too much rigidity makes the plan stale; too much motion makes the plan impossible to coordinate.\n\nTemporal orchestration resolves the tension by making temporal assumptions explicit and connecting them to observable state, authority, consequence, and closure.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system treats activities as an unordered or statically scheduled set even though outcomes depend on precedence, timing windows, duration, lag, pace, phase, overlap, recovery, and adaptation. Local optimization makes tasks faster while the whole system waits, misses readiness, amplifies stale feedback, overloads shared resources, or commits at the wrong time."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P103-C11", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the same constituent activities across compared executions.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "One fixed set of activities can be performed as a sequence.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve order difference rather than a change in activity membership.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The activities are performed in different orders.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail a meaningful outcome difference between the sequences.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The resulting outcomes differ.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must make sequence causal rather than merely correlated with executions that differ for other reasons.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The ordering difference causes the outcome difference.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}], "predicate": "The same activities yield different outcomes when performed in different orders.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "activity order changes outcome", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P103-C11-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Temporal dynamics can be order-independent.", "slug": "temporal_dynamics"}], "residual_id": "r:temporal_orchestration_design:b068_a09_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b068_a09_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when outcome depends materially on order, timing windows, duration, pace, phase, recurrence, overlap, waiting, or feedback delay. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: the same activities yield different outcomes in different orders.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["the same activities yield different outcomes in different orders", "Use this archetype when outcome depends materially on order, timing windows, duration, pace, phase, recurrence, overlap, waiting, or feedback delay."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Temporal dynamics can be order-independent.", "slug": "temporal_dynamics"}], "normalized_requirement": "the same activities yield different outcomes in different orders", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "the same activities yield different outcomes in different orders", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A critical period is a readiness or opportunity window whose opening and closing changes what action can succeed.", "role_mapping": "Window -> critical period; action -> time-sensitive intervention.", "slug": "critical_period", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b068_a09_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: readiness or opportunity windows open and close. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["readiness or opportunity windows open and close"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Critical Period", "one_liner": "A time-gated window of elevated malleability during which a configuration can be acquired, after which the same inputs are far harder or impossible to take on.", "page_ref": "prime:critical_period", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Window -> critical period; action -> time-sensitive intervention.", "slug": "critical_period", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A critical period is a readiness or opportunity window whose opening and closing changes what action can succeed."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "readiness or opportunity windows open and close", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Subsystems operating at incompatible tempos or phases instantiate tempo mismatch.", "role_mapping": "Subsystems -> processes; tempos -> mismatched rates.", "slug": "tempo_mismatch", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b068_a09_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: subsystems operate at different tempos or phases. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["subsystems operate at different tempos or phases"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Tempo Mismatch", "one_liner": "A system's pace of action is out of phase with the timescale of the environment it must respond to, so correct decisions degrade outcomes by arriving against a world that has already moved on (or one not yet ready to absorb them).", "page_ref": "prime:tempo_mismatch", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Subsystems -> processes; tempos -> mismatched rates.", "slug": "tempo_mismatch", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Subsystems operating at incompatible tempos or phases instantiate tempo mismatch."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "subsystems operate at different tempos or phases", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A transient response can be observed promptly before state changes.", "slug": "transient_response"}], "residual_id": "r:temporal_orchestration_design:b068_a09_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b068_a09_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Commitment and synchronization enable coordination, while uncertainty and changing states require slack, reversibility, phase diversity, and adaptation. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: feedback arrives after the state has changed.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["feedback arrives after the state has changed", "Commitment and synchronization enable coordination, while uncertainty and changing states require slack, reversibility, phase diversity, and adaptation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A transient response can be observed promptly before state changes.", "slug": "transient_response"}], "normalized_requirement": "feedback arrives after the state has changed", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "feedback arrives after the state has changed", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P103-C12", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3"], ["O1", "O2", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve plural concurrent work streams rather than sequential activity.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Two or more work activities execute in parallel.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must make concurrency causal rather than merely present.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The parallel execution creates the selected failure.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires a timing- or access-dependent race among concurrent activities.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The parallel work creates a race.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch requires outputs to be redone because concurrent activities proceeded without required ordering or coordination.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The parallel work creates rework.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Parallel work creates races or rework.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "parallel execution causes races or rework", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P103-C12-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Parallel branches can merge without races or rework.", "slug": "branching_and_merging"}], "residual_id": "r:temporal_orchestration_design:b068_a09_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b068_a09_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "They count effort while ignoring waiting and recovery; compress tasks while leaving feedback lag untouched; synchronize everything and create contention; overlap work before interfaces stabilize; or honor an internal deadline after the external opportunity has closed. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: parallel work creates races or rework.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["parallel work creates races or rework", "They count effort while ignoring waiting and recovery; compress tasks while leaving feedback lag untouched; synchronize everything and create contention; overlap work before interfaces stabilize; or honor an internal deadline after the external opportunity has closed."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "With a heisenbug and race-condition root fixed, at least two concurrent execution streams have a timing-dependent race that causes the failure; rework may be absent because its DNF branch is not selected.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Heisenbug", "one_liner": "Name the software defect whose failure vanishes under observation because attaching a debugger, adding a print, or disabling optimization perturbs the timing window or interleaving it rides on — so disappearance-under-observation is the diagnostic tell, not evidence the bug is gone.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:heisenbug", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1", "O2", "O3"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "heisenbug_root_is_race_condition", "predicate": "The latent heisenbug defect is a race condition.", "rationale": "The branch-selection guard chooses the exact record's expressly named race-condition root; concurrency, causality, and the race outcome follow from that one anchored fact."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "heisenbug"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "The latent heisenbug defect is a race condition."}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "heisenbug", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P103-C12-U1", "why_it_fits": "The candidate supplies the timing-sensitive execution and failure spine. One candidate-anchored root-cause guard selects its named race manifestation and fills the complete race branch."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "parallel work creates races or rework", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "duration uncertainty propagates across dependencies.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: duration uncertainty propagates across dependencies. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["duration uncertainty propagates across dependencies"]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "duration uncertainty propagates across dependencies"}, {"display_text": "recurring cycles have become ritualized or misaligned.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: recurring cycles have become ritualized or misaligned. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["recurring cycles have become ritualized or misaligned"]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "recurring cycles have become ritualized or misaligned"}, {"display_text": "plans require frequent rescheduling as evidence changes.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: plans require frequent rescheduling as evidence changes. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["plans require frequent rescheduling as evidence changes"]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 8, "text": "plans require frequent rescheduling as evidence changes"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 68, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-068", "ledger_sha256": "e026ae7e5a38034f6b6e9fc9f31ee6f0343101d40067484e425f04c441b25cdf"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Temporal Resolution and Sampling Rate Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:temporal_resolution_sampling_rate_design", "slug": "temporal_resolution_sampling_rate_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 1, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 2 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 2}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A changing process is observed, modeled, or acted on at a time resolution that does not match the dynamics that matter, causing missed events, aliased patterns, delayed response, noisy over-measurement, or unnecessary burden.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A changing process is observed, modeled, or acted on at a time resolution that does not match the dynamics that matter, causing missed events, aliased patterns, delayed response, noisy over-measurement, or unnecessary burden."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Aliasing occurs when important temporal variation happens faster than the sampling rate can represent.", "role_mapping": "State changes -> signal frequency; observations -> samples.", "slug": "aliasing", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b068_a10_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Important system states change between ordinary observation points. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Important system states change between ordinary observation points."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Aliasing", "one_liner": "Sampling a signal below the rate its information content demands folds distinct high-frequency states onto identical low-frequency ones, fabricating false structure that masquerades as real signal.", "page_ref": "prime:aliasing", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "State changes -> signal frequency; observations -> samples.", "slug": "aliasing", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Aliasing occurs when important temporal variation happens faster than the sampling rate can represent."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Important system states change between ordinary observation points.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P103-C13", "dnf": [], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [], "predicate": "The same data stream could be represented continuously, as periodic samples, as event records, or as aggregated intervals.", "resolution": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RESIDUAL", "semantic_scope": "NON_ABSTRACTION", "structural_head": "data stream admits multiple temporal representations", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P103-C13-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Aliasing can occur even when only one representation format is available.", "slug": "aliasing"}], "residual_id": "r:temporal_resolution_sampling_rate_design:b068_a10_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b068_a10_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The same data stream could be treated as continuous, periodic samples, event records, or aggregated intervals. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The same data stream could be treated as continuous, periodic samples, event records, or aggregated intervals."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RECLASSIFIED", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 1, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Aliasing can occur even when only one representation format is available.", "slug": "aliasing"}], "normalized_requirement": "The same data stream could be treated as continuous, periodic samples, event records, or aggregated intervals.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RECLASSIFIED", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later candidate-blind atomization classified this remainder as a threshold, parameter, materiality test, or other non-abstraction rather than a catalog gap."}, "predicate": "The same data stream could be treated as continuous, periodic samples, event records, or aggregated intervals.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Decision makers need to detect excursions, trends, regime changes, or short-lived events before they decay or compound.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: Decision makers need to detect excursions, trends, regime changes, or short-lived events before they decay or compound. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Decision makers need to detect excursions, trends, regime changes, or short-lived events before they decay or compound."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Decision makers need to detect excursions, trends, regime changes, or short-lived events before they decay or compound."}, {"display_text": "High-frequency data creates noise, alert fatigue, storage burden, privacy exposure, or misleading apparent precision.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Too little resolution hides dynamics; too much resolution can amplify noise, cost, cognitive load, surveillance burden, and false confidence. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: High-frequency data creates noise, alert fatigue, storage burden, privacy exposure, or misleading apparent precision. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["High-frequency data creates noise, alert fatigue, storage burden, privacy exposure, or misleading apparent precision.", "Too little resolution hides dynamics; too much resolution can amplify noise, cost, cognitive load, surveillance burden, and false confidence."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "High-frequency data creates noise, alert fatigue, storage burden, privacy exposure, or misleading apparent precision."}, {"display_text": "The action latency, reporting cadence, or control loop depends on how often new observations arrive.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The action latency, reporting cadence, or control loop depends on how often new observations arrive. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The action latency, reporting cadence, or control loop depends on how often new observations arrive."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The action latency, reporting cadence, or control loop depends on how often new observations arrive."}, {"display_text": "Different stakeholders need different temporal views of the same process: raw events, near-real-time dashboards, daily aggregates, or long-run trends.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Temporal detail improves observability only when it matches the process and decision. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Different stakeholders need different temporal views of the same process: raw events, near-real-time dashboards, daily aggregates, or long-run trends. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Different stakeholders need different temporal views of the same process: raw events, near-real-time dashboards, daily aggregates, or long-run trends.", "Temporal detail improves observability only when it matches the process and decision."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Different stakeholders need different temporal views of the same process: raw events, near-real-time dashboards, daily aggregates, or long-run trends."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 68, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-068", "ledger_sha256": "e026ae7e5a38034f6b6e9fc9f31ee6f0343101d40067484e425f04c441b25cdf"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Temporary Scaffold and Fade", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:temporary_scaffold_and_fade", "slug": "temporary_scaffold_and_fade"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a three-way tension between failure, help, and dependence. If no support is provided, the learner may fail before useful learning can occur. If support is too strong, the scaffold does the real work. If support stays too long, the system confuses scaffolded completion with actual competence.\n\nThis problem often appears as successful performance during training or guided walkthroughs followed by poor performance once prompts, templates, or coaching disappear. It also appears when organizations keep adding job aids and review layers but never ask whether responsibility has moved to the learner.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A learner, user, operator, or team needs support to perform a task, but no-support failure and permanent-support dependence are both undesirable."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Scaffolding supports a task currently beyond the learner's independent capability.", "role_mapping": "Target task -> learning challenge; current capability -> unsupported level.", "slug": "scaffolding", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b068_a11_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when the target outcome is capability growth. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The target task is valuable but currently beyond independent capability.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The target task is valuable but currently beyond independent capability.", "Use this archetype when the target outcome is capability growth."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Scaffolding", "one_liner": "Temporary learning support.", "page_ref": "prime:scaffolding", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Target task -> learning challenge; current capability -> unsupported level.", "slug": "scaffolding", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Scaffolding supports a task currently beyond the learner's independent capability."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The target task is valuable but currently beyond independent capability.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Temporary support prevents discouraging or unsafe failure while learning occurs.", "role_mapping": "Failure risk -> need for scaffold; support -> assisted performance.", "slug": "scaffolding", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b068_a11_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "If no support is provided, the learner may fail before useful learning can occur. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Failure without support would be costly, discouraging, unsafe, or too slow for learning.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Failure without support would be costly, discouraging, unsafe, or too slow for learning.", "If no support is provided, the learner may fail before useful learning can occur."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Scaffolding", "one_liner": "Temporary learning support.", "page_ref": "prime:scaffolding", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Failure risk -> need for scaffold; support -> assisted performance.", "slug": "scaffolding", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Temporary support prevents discouraging or unsafe failure while learning occurs."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Failure without support would be costly, discouraging, unsafe, or too slow for learning.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A scaffold is designed to be reduced as competence grows.", "role_mapping": "Capability development -> learner growth; reduced support -> fading.", "slug": "scaffolding", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b068_a11_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The best cases have an observable baseline, a named barrier, a support form that can be reduced, and a meaningful way to test independence. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The needed support can plausibly be reduced as capability develops.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The needed support can plausibly be reduced as capability develops.", "The best cases have an observable baseline, a named barrier, a support form that can be reduced, and a meaningful way to test independence."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Scaffolding", "one_liner": "Temporary learning support.", "page_ref": "prime:scaffolding", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Capability development -> learner growth; reduced support -> fading.", "slug": "scaffolding", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A scaffold is designed to be reduced as competence grows."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The needed support can plausibly be reduced as capability develops.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The goal is independent transferable performance rather than permanent assisted completion.", "role_mapping": "Independent performance -> scaffold endpoint; capability -> transfer.", "slug": "scaffolding", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b068_a11_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "If support stays too long, the system confuses scaffolded completion with actual competence. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The goal is independent performance or transferable capability, not merely completion of one supported task.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The goal is independent performance or transferable capability, not merely completion of one supported task.", "If support stays too long, the system confuses scaffolded completion with actual competence."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Scaffolding", "one_liner": "Temporary learning support.", "page_ref": "prime:scaffolding", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Independent performance -> scaffold endpoint; capability -> transfer.", "slug": "scaffolding", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The goal is independent transferable performance rather than permanent assisted completion."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The goal is independent performance or transferable capability, not merely completion of one supported task.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 68, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-068", "ledger_sha256": "e026ae7e5a38034f6b6e9fc9f31ee6f0343101d40067484e425f04c441b25cdf"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Tension–Resolution Cycle Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:tension_resolution_cycle_design", "slug": "tension_resolution_cycle_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 2 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 2}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system needs a later state, explanation, commitment, or completion to carry more value than immediate delivery would produce, but the value can arise only if a preceding unresolved state is deliberately constructed and resolved at the right moment. Without governance, the buildup is too weak, too short, too long, arbitrary, manipulative, or harmful.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system needs a later state, explanation, commitment, or completion to carry more value than immediate delivery would produce, but the value can arise only if a preceding unresolved state is deliberately constructed and resolved at the right moment. Without governance, the buildup is too weak, too short, too long, arbitrary, manipulative, or harmful."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Tension and release necessarily derives resolution from contrast with a baseline, expectation, or unresolved tendency.", "role_mapping": "Incomplete state -> tension; desired outcome -> release.", "slug": "tension_and_release", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b068_a12_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The desired resolution depends on contrast with a stable baseline, expectation, incomplete state, or competing tendency. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The desired resolution depends on contrast with a stable baseline, expectation, incomplete state, or competing tendency."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Tension And Release", "one_liner": "Deliberately build instability away from an expected baseline, sustain it long enough for anticipation to accrue, then resolve it in a way the prior tension makes valuable—a single coupled cycle whose payoff is earned by the build.", "page_ref": "prime:tension_and_release", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Incomplete state -> tension; desired outcome -> release.", "slug": "tension_and_release", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Tension and release necessarily derives resolution from contrast with a baseline, expectation, or unresolved tendency."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The desired resolution depends on contrast with a stable baseline, expectation, incomplete state, or competing tendency.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Effective release is prepared by the buildup rather than appended as an unrelated event.", "role_mapping": "Buildup -> tension; prepared resolution -> release.", "slug": "tension_and_release", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b068_a12_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The eventual resolution can be prepared by the buildup rather than appended as an unrelated surprise. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The eventual resolution can be prepared by the buildup rather than appended as an unrelated surprise."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Tension And Release", "one_liner": "Deliberately build instability away from an expected baseline, sustain it long enough for anticipation to accrue, then resolve it in a way the prior tension makes valuable—a single coupled cycle whose payoff is earned by the build.", "page_ref": "prime:tension_and_release", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Buildup -> tension; prepared resolution -> release.", "slug": "tension_and_release", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Effective release is prepared by the buildup rather than appended as an unrelated event."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The eventual resolution can be prepared by the buildup rather than appended as an unrelated surprise.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Participants or system state can tolerate a bounded unresolved interval and can exit or recover if it fails.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system needs a later state, explanation, commitment, or completion to carry more value than immediate delivery would produce, but the value can arise only if a preceding unresolved state is deliberately constructed and resolved at the right moment. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: Participants or system state can tolerate a bounded unresolved interval and can exit or recover if it fails. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Participants or system state can tolerate a bounded unresolved interval and can exit or recover if it fails.", "A system needs a later state, explanation, commitment, or completion to carry more value than immediate delivery would produce, but the value can arise only if a preceding unresolved state is deliberately constructed and resolved at the right moment."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "Participants or system state can tolerate a bounded unresolved interval and can exit or recover if it fails."}, {"display_text": "Observable evidence can distinguish useful anticipation or readiness from confusion, distress, or disengagement.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: Observable evidence can distinguish useful anticipation or readiness from confusion, distress, or disengagement. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Observable evidence can distinguish useful anticipation or readiness from confusion, distress, or disengagement."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Observable evidence can distinguish useful anticipation or readiness from confusion, distress, or disengagement."}, {"display_text": "Timing materially changes the value of the outcome.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Timing materially changes the value of the outcome. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Timing materially changes the value of the outcome."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Timing materially changes the value of the outcome."}, {"display_text": "A post-resolution state can be stabilized and the cycle can be reset.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: A post-resolution state can be stabilized and the cycle can be reset. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A post-resolution state can be stabilized and the cycle can be reset."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "A post-resolution state can be stabilized and the cycle can be reset."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 68, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-068", "ledger_sha256": "e026ae7e5a38034f6b6e9fc9f31ee6f0343101d40067484e425f04c441b25cdf"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Termination Condition Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:termination_condition_design", "slug": "termination_condition_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 5, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is nontermination. A process has a path that lets it continue by default: another recursion, another appeal, another review pass, another search expansion, another retry, another request for evidence, or another refinement. Because the end condition is implicit or contested, the process either continues until exhaustion or stops for reasons no one can inspect.\n\nThis is a well-foundedness problem in practical form. Without a base case, bounded space, progress measure, threshold, or finality rule, the system lacks a reliable bottom.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A recursive, iterative, deliberative, search, review, escalation, approval, or refinement process lacks a clear stopping rule, causing work to continue indefinitely, regress to ever-earlier justifications, re-enter the same state repeatedly, or avoid final disposition."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A termination condition is required for recursion, retries, loops, or repeated refinement that can otherwise continue.", "role_mapping": "Process -> iteration; stopping predicate -> termination condition.", "slug": "termination_condition", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b068_a13_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A process has a path that lets it continue by default: another recursion, another appeal, another review pass, another search expansion, another retry, another request for evidence, or another refinement. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The process can call itself, retry, loop, escalate, reopen, revisit, or continue adding refinements.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The process can call itself, retry, loop, escalate, reopen, revisit, or continue adding refinements.", "A process has a path that lets it continue by default: another recursion, another appeal, another review pass, another search expansion, another retry, another request for evidence, or another refinement."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Termination Condition", "one_liner": "An explicit, checkable predicate that decides whether an iterative or recursive process stops or continues.", "page_ref": "prime:termination_condition", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Process -> iteration; stopping predicate -> termination condition.", "slug": "termination_condition", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A termination condition is required for recursion, retries, loops, or repeated refinement that can otherwise continue."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The process can call itself, retry, loop, escalate, reopen, revisit, or continue adding refinements.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Disagreement over done, sufficient, converged, or final shows the stopping predicate is unspecified.", "role_mapping": "Completion dispute -> missing termination criterion.", "slug": "termination_condition", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b068_a13_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Participants disagree about what counts as done, sufficient, exhausted, converged, or final. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Participants disagree about what counts as done, sufficient, exhausted, converged, or final."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Termination Condition", "one_liner": "An explicit, checkable predicate that decides whether an iterative or recursive process stops or continues.", "page_ref": "prime:termination_condition", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Completion dispute -> missing termination criterion.", "slug": "termination_condition", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Disagreement over done, sufficient, converged, or final shows the stopping predicate is unspecified."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Participants disagree about what counts as done, sufficient, exhausted, converged, or final.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Marginal value can fall while remaining positive enough to justify continuation.", "slug": "marginal_analysis"}], "residual_id": "r:termination_condition_design:b068_a13_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b068_a13_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A process has a path that lets it continue by default: another recursion, another appeal, another review pass, another search expansion, another retry, another request for evidence, or another refinement. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The marginal value of more review, search, evidence, or refinement is falling but the process keeps consuming resources.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The marginal value of more review, search, evidence, or refinement is falling but the process keeps consuming resources.", "A process has a path that lets it continue by default: another recursion, another appeal, another review pass, another search expansion, another retry, another request for evidence, or another refinement."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Marginal value can fall while remaining positive enough to justify continuation.", "slug": "marginal_analysis"}], "normalized_requirement": "The marginal value of more review, search, evidence, or refinement is falling but the process keeps consuming resources.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The marginal value of more review, search, evidence, or refinement is falling but the process keeps consuming resources.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Escalation or appeal without a final level or reentry boundary lacks a terminating state.", "role_mapping": "Escalation path -> recursive process; final level -> terminal state.", "slug": "termination_condition", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b068_a13_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when a process has recursive, iterative, review, search, escalation, appeal, or refinement structure and participants cannot reliably tell when continuation should end. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Escalation, exception handling, or appeal routes have no final level or reentry boundary.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Escalation, exception handling, or appeal routes have no final level or reentry boundary.", "Use this archetype when a process has recursive, iterative, review, search, escalation, appeal, or refinement structure and participants cannot reliably tell when continuation should end."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Termination Condition", "one_liner": "An explicit, checkable predicate that decides whether an iterative or recursive process stops or continues.", "page_ref": "prime:termination_condition", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Escalation path -> recursive process; final level -> terminal state.", "slug": "termination_condition", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Escalation or appeal without a final level or reentry boundary lacks a terminating state."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Escalation, exception handling, or appeal routes have no final level or reentry boundary.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "When stopping affects safety or rights, the condition must be explicit rather than arbitrary.", "role_mapping": "Sensitive process -> governed loop; stop -> justified predicate.", "slug": "termination_condition", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b068_a13_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A recursive, iterative, deliberative, search, review, escalation, approval, or refinement process lacks a clear stopping rule, causing work to continue indefinitely, regress to ever-earlier justifications, re-enter the same state repeatedly, or avoid final disposition. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A process is safety-, rights-, cost-, or trust-sensitive enough that arbitrary stopping would be harmful.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A process is safety-, rights-, cost-, or trust-sensitive enough that arbitrary stopping would be harmful.", "A recursive, iterative, deliberative, search, review, escalation, approval, or refinement process lacks a clear stopping rule, causing work to continue indefinitely, regress to ever-earlier justifications, re-enter the same state repeatedly, or avoid final disposition."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Termination Condition", "one_liner": "An explicit, checkable predicate that decides whether an iterative or recursive process stops or continues.", "page_ref": "prime:termination_condition", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Sensitive process -> governed loop; stop -> justified predicate.", "slug": "termination_condition", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "When stopping affects safety or rights, the condition must be explicit rather than arbitrary."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A process is safety-, rights-, cost-, or trust-sensitive enough that arbitrary stopping would be harmful.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A completion claim for exhaustive search requires a bounded universe and evidence that its stopping condition was met.", "role_mapping": "Search universe -> state space; exhaustion -> terminal predicate.", "slug": "termination_condition", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b068_a13_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A process has a path that lets it continue by default: another recursion, another appeal, another review pass, another search expansion, another retry, another request for evidence, or another refinement. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: An exhaustive search or review claims completion but lacks a bounded universe or evidence of exhaustion.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["An exhaustive search or review claims completion but lacks a bounded universe or evidence of exhaustion.", "A process has a path that lets it continue by default: another recursion, another appeal, another review pass, another search expansion, another retry, another request for evidence, or another refinement."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Termination Condition", "one_liner": "An explicit, checkable predicate that decides whether an iterative or recursive process stops or continues.", "page_ref": "prime:termination_condition", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Search universe -> state space; exhaustion -> terminal predicate.", "slug": "termination_condition", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A completion claim for exhaustive search requires a bounded universe and evidence that its stopping condition was met."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "An exhaustive search or review claims completion but lacks a bounded universe or evidence of exhaustion.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 68, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-068", "ledger_sha256": "e026ae7e5a38034f6b6e9fc9f31ee6f0343101d40067484e425f04c441b25cdf"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Textual Close-Reading Mode", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:textual_close_reading_mode", "slug": "textual_close_reading_mode"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 6, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 6, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "6 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is premature scale change. Meaning-bearing material exists at several nested levels, but a reader jumps from a small part to a large conclusion without exposing the intermediate steps. The jump may begin with compression—“this policy is about safety”—or with fixation—“this single word proves hostile intent.” Both failures hide how local features relate to one another and to the whole.\n\nTexts intensify this problem because their evidence is relational. A word takes scope from syntax. A sentence changes force through its position after an exception. A repeated image matters because it recurs with variation. An omission becomes evidence only when a convention or parallel passage creates a justified expectation. A quotation can reverse meaning when speaker, irony, negation, or surrounding qualification is removed. Treating the artifact as a bag of words destroys these relations.\n\nThe opposite risk is microscopic endlessness. Once every mark is declared potentially meaningful, the reader can always find another detail, another association, or another contextual frame. The archetype therefore treats grain, question scope, counterreading, and stopping as governing constraints. Its purpose is warranted interpretation, not maximal annotation.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A text or text-like artifact carries consequential meaning through fine-grained form, but readers move too quickly from the artifact to a summary, intention, category, or policy conclusion. The compression erases evidence-bearing detail and hides the inferential jumps between small marks and large claims. Conversely, a reader may fixate on an isolated mark and overread it without testing recurrence, relation, whole-text coherence, or plausible alternatives. The system needs a disciplined mode that preserves grain without losing bounded interpretation."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Close reading treats exact wording, syntax, sequence, motif, and omission as materially interpretive.", "role_mapping": "Textual grain -> evidence; interpretation -> claim.", "slug": "close_reading", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b068_a14_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when exact form could change a consequential interpretation. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Exact wording, punctuation, syntax, sequence, typography, motif, citation, exception, or omission could materially change the interpretation.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Exact wording, punctuation, syntax, sequence, typography, motif, citation, exception, or omission could materially change the interpretation.", "Use this archetype when exact form could change a consequential interpretation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Close Reading", "one_liner": "The disciplined posture of treating an artefact's smallest meaningful units as load-bearing evidence, suspending paraphrase until the grain is exhausted and binding every higher-order claim to cited marks.", "page_ref": "prime:close_reading", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Textual grain -> evidence; interpretation -> claim.", "slug": "close_reading", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Close reading treats exact wording, syntax, sequence, motif, and omission as materially interpretive."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Exact wording, punctuation, syntax, sequence, typography, motif, citation, exception, or omission could materially change the interpretation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "It reconstructs a visible path from compact textual units to a higher-order claim.", "role_mapping": "Cited unit -> textual evidence; claim -> interpretation.", "slug": "close_reading", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b068_a14_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The higher the stakes and the more compact the artifact, the stronger the case for a temporary high-resolution reading mode. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A higher-order claim is being made from a compact artifact, yet the path from cited unit to claim is not visible or reproducible.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A higher-order claim is being made from a compact artifact, yet the path from cited unit to claim is not visible or reproducible.", "The higher the stakes and the more compact the artifact, the stronger the case for a temporary high-resolution reading mode."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Close Reading", "one_liner": "The disciplined posture of treating an artefact's smallest meaningful units as load-bearing evidence, suspending paraphrase until the grain is exhausted and binding every higher-order claim to cited marks.", "page_ref": "prime:close_reading", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Cited unit -> textual evidence; claim -> interpretation.", "slug": "close_reading", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "It reconstructs a visible path from compact textual units to a higher-order claim."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A higher-order claim is being made from a compact artifact, yet the path from cited unit to claim is not visible or reproducible.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Competing readings are adjudicated by the particular words and relations each can license.", "role_mapping": "Readings -> interpretations; exact language -> discriminating evidence.", "slug": "close_reading", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b068_a14_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when participants agree on topic but disagree on warrant. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Competing readings agree on the general topic but disagree about what particular words, relations, or formal choices license.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Competing readings agree on the general topic but disagree about what particular words, relations, or formal choices license.", "It is especially useful when participants agree on topic but disagree on warrant."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Close Reading", "one_liner": "The disciplined posture of treating an artefact's smallest meaningful units as load-bearing evidence, suspending paraphrase until the grain is exhausted and binding every higher-order claim to cited marks.", "page_ref": "prime:close_reading", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Readings -> interpretations; exact language -> discriminating evidence.", "slug": "close_reading", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Competing readings are adjudicated by the particular words and relations each can license."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Competing readings agree on the general topic but disagree about what particular words, relations, or formal choices license.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "High interpretive stakes warrant slower grain-sensitive inspection.", "role_mapping": "Rights or doctrine -> stakes; textual grain -> decision evidence.", "slug": "close_reading", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b068_a14_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The system needs a disciplined mode that preserves grain without losing bounded interpretation. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The stakes of interpretation justify slower inspection: rights, duties, safety, doctrine, public meaning, historical claims, design behavior, or institutional commitments may turn on textual grain.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The stakes of interpretation justify slower inspection: rights, duties, safety, doctrine, public meaning, historical claims, design behavior, or institutional commitments may turn on textual grain.", "The system needs a disciplined mode that preserves grain without losing bounded interpretation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Close Reading", "one_liner": "The disciplined posture of treating an artefact's smallest meaningful units as load-bearing evidence, suspending paraphrase until the grain is exhausted and binding every higher-order claim to cited marks.", "page_ref": "prime:close_reading", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Rights or doctrine -> stakes; textual grain -> decision evidence.", "slug": "close_reading", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "High interpretive stakes warrant slower grain-sensitive inspection."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The stakes of interpretation justify slower inspection: rights, duties, safety, doctrine, public meaning, historical claims, design behavior, or institutional commitments may turn on textual grain.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The method resists substituting paraphrase, snippets, or inherited gloss for the source artifact.", "role_mapping": "Derivative text -> substitute; source artifact -> primary object.", "slug": "close_reading", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b068_a14_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A text or text-like artifact carries consequential meaning through fine-grained form, but readers move too quickly from the artifact to a summary, intention, category, or policy conclusion. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Paraphrase, search snippets, machine summaries, extracted quotations, or inherited glosses risk substituting for examination of the source artifact.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Paraphrase, search snippets, machine summaries, extracted quotations, or inherited glosses risk substituting for examination of the source artifact.", "A text or text-like artifact carries consequential meaning through fine-grained form, but readers move too quickly from the artifact to a summary, intention, category, or policy conclusion."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Close Reading", "one_liner": "The disciplined posture of treating an artefact's smallest meaningful units as load-bearing evidence, suspending paraphrase until the grain is exhausted and binding every higher-order claim to cited marks.", "page_ref": "prime:close_reading", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Derivative text -> substitute; source artifact -> primary object.", "slug": "close_reading", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The method resists substituting paraphrase, snippets, or inherited gloss for the source artifact."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Paraphrase, search snippets, machine summaries, extracted quotations, or inherited glosses risk substituting for examination of the source artifact.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A bounded segment makes grain-level inspection feasible without claiming exhaustive corpus coverage.", "role_mapping": "Bounded artifact -> reading scope; inspection -> close analysis.", "slug": "close_reading", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b068_a14_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The archetype must slow abstraction enough for the artifact to constrain the reading, then reconnect the inspected grain to context, whole, rival readings, and use. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The artifact is short enough, segmentable enough, or selectively bounded enough that task-relevant grain can be inspected without pretending to exhaust an unbounded corpus.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The artifact is short enough, segmentable enough, or selectively bounded enough that task-relevant grain can be inspected without pretending to exhaust an unbounded corpus.", "The archetype must slow abstraction enough for the artifact to constrain the reading, then reconnect the inspected grain to context, whole, rival readings, and use."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Close Reading", "one_liner": "The disciplined posture of treating an artefact's smallest meaningful units as load-bearing evidence, suspending paraphrase until the grain is exhausted and binding every higher-order claim to cited marks.", "page_ref": "prime:close_reading", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Bounded artifact -> reading scope; inspection -> close analysis.", "slug": "close_reading", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A bounded segment makes grain-level inspection feasible without claiming exhaustive corpus coverage."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The artifact is short enough, segmentable enough, or selectively bounded enough that task-relevant grain can be inspected without pretending to exhaust an unbounded corpus.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 68, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-068", "ledger_sha256": "e026ae7e5a38034f6b6e9fc9f31ee6f0343101d40067484e425f04c441b25cdf"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Texture as Signal Encoding", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:texture_as_signal_encoding", "slug": "texture_as_signal_encoding"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 2, "statement": "1 of 6 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system needs to communicate status, property, quality, category, warning, or affordance, but ordinary labels, color, shape, position, or icons are insufficient, overloaded, inaccessible, too slow, or unreliable across viewing and handling conditions.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system needs to communicate status, property, quality, category, warning, or affordance, but ordinary labels, color, shape, position, or icons are insufficient, overloaded, inaccessible, too slow, or unreliable across viewing and handling conditions."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P103-C14", "dnf": [], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [], "predicate": "Users must be able to parse information quickly without reading lengthy labels.", "resolution": "SOURCE_DEFECT", "semantic_scope": "SOURCE_DEFECT", "structural_head": "information should be rapidly parseable without lengthy labels", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P103-C14-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Texture can be decorative and require no rapid parsing.", "slug": "texture"}], "residual_id": "r:texture_as_signal_encoding:b068_a15_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b068_a15_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Users must parse information quickly without reading lengthy labels. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Users must parse information quickly without reading lengthy labels."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "SOURCE_REVIEW_REQUIRED", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 1, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Texture can be decorative and require no rapid parsing.", "slug": "texture"}], "normalized_requirement": "Users must parse information quickly without reading lengthy labels.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "SOURCE_REVIEW_REQUIRED", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later candidate-blind atomization found that the source wording lacks a relation required by its diagnostic reading, so this is a source-repair issue rather than evidence of a missing abstraction."}, "predicate": "Users must parse information quickly without reading lengthy labels.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Texture can be used alongside fully available color.", "slug": "texture"}], "residual_id": "r:texture_as_signal_encoding:b068_a15_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b068_a15_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system needs to communicate status, property, quality, category, warning, or affordance, but ordinary labels, color, shape, position, or icons are insufficient, overloaded, inaccessible, too slow, or unreliable across viewing and handling conditions. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Color is unavailable, semantically overloaded, inaccessible to some users, or likely to be lost in printing or low-light conditions.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Color is unavailable, semantically overloaded, inaccessible to some users, or likely to be lost in printing or low-light conditions.", "A system needs to communicate status, property, quality, category, warning, or affordance, but ordinary labels, color, shape, position, or icons are insufficient, overloaded, inaccessible, too slow, or unreliable across viewing and handling conditions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Texture can be used alongside fully available color.", "slug": "texture"}], "normalized_requirement": "Color is unavailable, semantically overloaded, inaccessible to some users, or likely to be lost in printing or low-light conditions.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Color is unavailable, semantically overloaded, inaccessible to some users, or likely to be lost in printing or low-light conditions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P103-C15", "dnf": [], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [], "predicate": "Information must be available through touch, material finish, or haptic interaction rather than sight alone.", "resolution": "SOURCE_DEFECT", "semantic_scope": "SOURCE_DEFECT", "structural_head": "information should be available haptically rather than only visually", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P103-C15-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Visual texture need not be haptically detectable.", "slug": "texture"}], "residual_id": "r:texture_as_signal_encoding:b068_a15_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b068_a15_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The information must be available through touch, material finish, or haptic interaction rather than sight alone. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The information must be available through touch, material finish, or haptic interaction rather than sight alone."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "SOURCE_REVIEW_REQUIRED", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 1, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Visual texture need not be haptically detectable.", "slug": "texture"}], "normalized_requirement": "The information must be available through touch, material finish, or haptic interaction rather than sight alone.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "SOURCE_REVIEW_REQUIRED", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later candidate-blind atomization found that the source wording lacks a relation required by its diagnostic reading, so this is a source-repair issue rather than evidence of a missing abstraction."}, "predicate": "The information must be available through touch, material finish, or haptic interaction rather than sight alone.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Encoding can carry a primary property through nontextual channels.", "slug": "encoding_and_decoding"}], "residual_id": "r:texture_as_signal_encoding:b068_a15_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b068_a15_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system needs to communicate status, property, quality, category, warning, or affordance, but ordinary labels, color, shape, position, or icons are insufficient, overloaded, inaccessible, too slow, or unreliable across viewing and handling conditions. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A display or object needs to encode a secondary property such as uncertainty, provisional status, quality, hazard, grip, or handling constraint.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A display or object needs to encode a secondary property such as uncertainty, provisional status, quality, hazard, grip, or handling constraint.", "A system needs to communicate status, property, quality, category, warning, or affordance, but ordinary labels, color, shape, position, or icons are insufficient, overloaded, inaccessible, too slow, or unreliable across viewing and handling conditions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Encoding can carry a primary property through nontextual channels.", "slug": "encoding_and_decoding"}], "normalized_requirement": "A display or object needs to encode a secondary property such as uncertainty, provisional status, quality, hazard, grip, or handling constraint.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A display or object needs to encode a secondary property such as uncertainty, provisional status, quality, hazard, grip, or handling constraint.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P104-C01", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"]], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve one signaling code and the media or access contexts in which it operates.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "One code communicates a signal through a medium or access context.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require cross-context use rather than operation in only one medium.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The code operates across more than one medium or access context.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail preservation of one code's signaling function across contexts rather than unrelated medium-specific codes.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The same code retains its signaling function across those contexts.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the mandatory requirement rather than mere possible portability.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Cross-context survival is required.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "The same signaling code must remain functional across multiple media or access contexts.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "one signaling code remains functional across media and access contexts", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P104-C01-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A texture can be medium-specific.", "slug": "texture"}], "residual_id": "r:texture_as_signal_encoding:b068_a15_c5", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b068_a15_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The same code must survive across media such as screen, print, physical product, packaging, and assistive contexts. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The same code must survive across media such as screen, print, physical product, packaging, and assistive contexts."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "An attempted counterexample using a visually styled control fails the exact DSA because meaning absent from the shared accessibility API is expressly non-robust.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Robust Accessibility", "one_liner": "Author web content so its load-bearing meaning lives in structural markup and the accessibility tree rather than in presentational accidents, so any current or future assistive technology — including ones the author cannot test against — can recover the intent through the same shared API.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:robust_accessibility", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "robust_accessibility"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "robust_accessibility", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P104-C01-U1", "why_it_fits": "Every complete robust-accessibility instance requires load-bearing meaning in one structural API recoverable across the open assistive-technology population."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The same code must survive across media such as screen, print, physical product, packaging, and assistive contexts.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Texture differences can already have a stable shared interpretation.", "slug": "texture"}], "residual_id": "r:texture_as_signal_encoding:b068_a15_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b068_a15_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Fine-grained differences already exist in the surface, but users are interpreting them inconsistently or accidentally. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Fine-grained differences already exist in the surface, but users are interpreting them inconsistently or accidentally."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Texture differences can already have a stable shared interpretation.", "slug": "texture"}], "normalized_requirement": "Fine-grained differences already exist in the surface, but users are interpreting them inconsistently or accidentally.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Fine-grained differences already exist in the surface, but users are interpreting them inconsistently or accidentally.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 68, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-068", "ledger_sha256": "e026ae7e5a38034f6b6e9fc9f31ee6f0343101d40067484e425f04c441b25cdf"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Theory-Responsive Case Sampling Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:theory_responsive_case_sampling_design", "slug": "theory_responsive_case_sampling_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 6, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 6, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "6 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "An inquiry is trying to build or refine an explanatory account from cases, but the next observation is chosen either as if the goal were population representativeness or as an ad hoc interesting example. Fixed representative sampling can miss the contrast, exception, or boundary condition needed for model refinement; opportunistic case selection can create confirmation bias, scope creep, and untraceable narrative fitting. The structural problem is the absence of a disciplined link between the current state of the model, the learning question for the next case, and the stop condition for enough cases.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "An inquiry is trying to build or refine an explanatory account from cases, but the next observation is chosen either as if the goal were population representativeness or as an ad hoc interesting example. Fixed representative sampling can miss the contrast, exception, or boundary condition needed for model refinement; opportunistic case selection can create confirmation bias, scope creep, and untraceable narrative fitting. The structural problem is the absence of a disciplined link between the current state of the model, the learning question for the next case, and the stop condition for enough cases."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Theoretical sampling serves theory construction rather than population estimation.", "role_mapping": "Goal -> theory refinement.", "slug": "theoretical_sampling", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b069_a01_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Model-building inquiry needs adaptive selection because the best next case depends on what has already been learned. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Theory-building or model-refinement goal.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Theory-building or model-refinement goal", "Model-building inquiry needs adaptive selection because the best next case depends on what has already been learned."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Theoretical Sampling", "one_liner": "Select the next case by what it would teach the emerging model rather than by what it represents about a population, interleaving selection with analysis and stopping when new cases add only confirmation.", "page_ref": "prime:theoretical_sampling", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Goal -> theory refinement.", "slug": "theoretical_sampling", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Theoretical sampling serves theory construction rather than population estimation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Theory-building or model-refinement goal", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Cases are selected sequentially as the theory develops.", "role_mapping": "Sequence -> adaptive selection.", "slug": "theoretical_sampling", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b069_a01_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Cases can be selected sequentially. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Cases can be selected sequentially"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Theoretical Sampling", "one_liner": "Select the next case by what it would teach the emerging model rather than by what it represents about a population, interleaving selection with analysis and stopping when new cases add only confirmation.", "page_ref": "prime:theoretical_sampling", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Sequence -> adaptive selection.", "slug": "theoretical_sampling", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Cases are selected sequentially as the theory develops."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Cases can be selected sequentially", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Unresolved categories and relations direct further sampling.", "role_mapping": "Model gap -> sampling target.", "slug": "theoretical_sampling", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b069_a01_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The structural problem is the absence of a disciplined link between the current state of the model, the learning question for the next case, and the stop condition for enough cases. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Current model has unresolved structure.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Current model has unresolved structure", "The structural problem is the absence of a disciplined link between the current state of the model, the learning question for the next case, and the stop condition for enough cases."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Theoretical Sampling", "one_liner": "Select the next case by what it would teach the emerging model rather than by what it represents about a population, interleaving selection with analysis and stopping when new cases add only confirmation.", "page_ref": "prime:theoretical_sampling", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Model gap -> sampling target.", "slug": "theoretical_sampling", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Unresolved categories and relations direct further sampling."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Current model has unresolved structure", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Candidate cases differ by expected theoretical information.", "role_mapping": "Case -> learning value.", "slug": "theoretical_sampling", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b069_a01_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The structural problem is the absence of a disciplined link between the current state of the model, the learning question for the next case, and the stop condition for enough cases. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Learning value differs across possible cases.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Learning value differs across possible cases", "The structural problem is the absence of a disciplined link between the current state of the model, the learning question for the next case, and the stop condition for enough cases."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Theoretical Sampling", "one_liner": "Select the next case by what it would teach the emerging model rather than by what it represents about a population, interleaving selection with analysis and stopping when new cases add only confirmation.", "page_ref": "prime:theoretical_sampling", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Case -> learning value.", "slug": "theoretical_sampling", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Candidate cases differ by expected theoretical information."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Learning value differs across possible cases", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Representativeness is not its primary selection criterion.", "role_mapping": "Selection -> conceptual relevance.", "slug": "theoretical_sampling", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b069_a01_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Representativeness is not the primary criterion. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Representativeness is not the primary criterion"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Theoretical Sampling", "one_liner": "Select the next case by what it would teach the emerging model rather than by what it represents about a population, interleaving selection with analysis and stopping when new cases add only confirmation.", "page_ref": "prime:theoretical_sampling", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Selection -> conceptual relevance.", "slug": "theoretical_sampling", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Representativeness is not its primary selection criterion."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Representativeness is not the primary criterion", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Sampling ends at theoretical saturation.", "role_mapping": "Saturation -> stop rule.", "slug": "theoretical_sampling", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b069_a01_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "But adaptivity creates discretion, and discretion can look like or become cherry-picking unless each selection is anchored to the model state, a learning question, and a revision or saturation criterion. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Saturation or diminishing learning can be assessed.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Saturation or diminishing learning can be assessed", "But adaptivity creates discretion, and discretion can look like or become cherry-picking unless each selection is anchored to the model state, a learning question, and a revision or saturation criterion."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Theoretical Sampling", "one_liner": "Select the next case by what it would teach the emerging model rather than by what it represents about a population, interleaving selection with analysis and stopping when new cases add only confirmation.", "page_ref": "prime:theoretical_sampling", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Saturation -> stop rule.", "slug": "theoretical_sampling", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Sampling ends at theoretical saturation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Saturation or diminishing learning can be assessed", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 69, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-069", "ledger_sha256": "34e723e381305203d3bf1eb43c975aa66c3f16e08c0407db4bbb62b8c05834a6"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Therapeutic Window Management", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:therapeutic_window_management", "slug": "therapeutic_window_management"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a dose-like variable with a non-monotonic relationship to outcomes. Increasing the input initially helps, then reaches a useful region, then eventually produces diminishing returns or adverse effects. Without explicit window management, systems often oscillate. They underreact until failure becomes undeniable, then overreact and create new harm.\n\nA common structural mistake is tracking only the input or only the desired benefit. For example, a team may track the number of alerts generated but not whether responders are ignoring them; a school may track assignment difficulty but not learner frustration; a policy team may track enforcement actions but not legitimacy, displacement, or backlash. A therapeutic window requires paired attention to effect and side effect.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A controllable input, exposure, intervention, or resource level has a beneficial range bounded by ineffectiveness below and harm, overload, or counterproductive effects above."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A therapeutic window is the intensity range between ineffective and harmful exposure.", "role_mapping": "Variable -> dose; help and harm -> response bounds.", "slug": "therapeutic_window", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b069_a02_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The same variable can help or harm depending on intensity. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The same variable can help or harm depending on intensity."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Therapeutic Window", "one_liner": "Optimal input range.", "page_ref": "prime:therapeutic_window", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Variable -> dose; help and harm -> response bounds.", "slug": "therapeutic_window", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A therapeutic window is the intensity range between ineffective and harmful exposure."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The same variable can help or harm depending on intensity.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Visible underdose and overdose effects define both window boundaries.", "role_mapping": "Symptoms -> lower and upper bounds.", "slug": "therapeutic_window", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b069_a02_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The archetype fits when there are visible symptoms of underdose, such as weak interventions that do not change outcomes, and symptoms of overdose, such as fatigue, backlash, toxicity, false positives, burnout, or coordination overload. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Underdose and overdose symptoms are both visible.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Underdose and overdose symptoms are both visible.", "The archetype fits when there are visible symptoms of underdose, such as weak interventions that do not change outcomes, and symptoms of overdose, such as fatigue, backlash, toxicity, false positives, burnout, or coordination overload."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Therapeutic Window", "one_liner": "Optimal input range.", "page_ref": "prime:therapeutic_window", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Symptoms -> lower and upper bounds.", "slug": "therapeutic_window", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Visible underdose and overdose effects define both window boundaries."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Underdose and overdose symptoms are both visible.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The window can vary across cases and over time.", "role_mapping": "Case or time -> response curve.", "slug": "therapeutic_window", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b069_a02_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Response varies across cases or over time. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Response varies across cases or over time."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Therapeutic Window", "one_liner": "Optimal input range.", "page_ref": "prime:therapeutic_window", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Case or time -> response curve.", "slug": "therapeutic_window", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The window can vary across cases and over time."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Response varies across cases or over time.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Uncertain delayed harm makes the upper boundary difficult to locate.", "role_mapping": "Harm boundary -> upper limit.", "slug": "therapeutic_window", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b069_a02_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The harm boundary is delayed or uncertain. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The harm boundary is delayed or uncertain."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Therapeutic Window", "one_liner": "Optimal input range.", "page_ref": "prime:therapeutic_window", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Harm boundary -> upper limit.", "slug": "therapeutic_window", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Uncertain delayed harm makes the upper boundary difficult to locate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The harm boundary is delayed or uncertain.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Current intensity is chosen by habit, fear, or maximization.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Current intensity is chosen by habit, fear, or maximization. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Current intensity is chosen by habit, fear, or maximization."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "Current intensity is chosen by habit, fear, or maximization."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 69, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-069", "ledger_sha256": "34e723e381305203d3bf1eb43c975aa66c3f16e08c0407db4bbb62b8c05834a6"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Three-Horizon Transition Mapping", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:three_horizon_transition_mapping", "slug": "three_horizon_transition_mapping"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is not merely uncertainty about the future. The deeper problem is coexistence. The current system is still active and often still necessary; the future pattern is not yet mature; and the transition space is full of fragile experiments that are easy to kill, capture, or overhype.\n\nWithout a horizon structure, decision makers tend to collapse these roles. They judge experiments by current efficiency metrics, treat future aspirations as slogans, overfund the legacy system because it is measurable, or abandon present responsibilities before replacements are ready. The result is either lock-in, chaos, or a portfolio of disconnected initiatives.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system must keep current operations viable while preparing for a different future, but its activities are mixed together without a clear temporal role, causing legacy lock-in, unsupported experiments, or premature future bets."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Horizon one is still necessary while showing strategic exhaustion.", "role_mapping": "Current system -> H1.", "slug": "three_horizons_analysis", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b069_a03_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The current system is still active and often still necessary; the future pattern is not yet mature; and the transition space is full of fragile experiments that are easy to kill, capture, or overhype. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The current system is still necessary but shows signs of brittleness, legitimacy loss, cost pressure, or strategic exhaustion.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The current system is still necessary but shows signs of brittleness, legitimacy loss, cost pressure, or strategic exhaustion.", "The current system is still active and often still necessary; the future pattern is not yet mature; and the transition space is full of fragile experiments that are easy to kill, capture, or overhype."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Three Horizons Analysis", "one_liner": "Short, medium, long-term transitions.", "page_ref": "prime:three_horizons_analysis", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Current system -> H1.", "slug": "three_horizons_analysis", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Horizon one is still necessary while showing strategic exhaustion."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The current system is still necessary but shows signs of brittleness, legitimacy loss, cost pressure, or strategic exhaustion.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Horizon three is visible but not ready to replace current operations.", "role_mapping": "Future pattern -> H3.", "slug": "three_horizons_analysis", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b069_a03_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The current system is still active and often still necessary; the future pattern is not yet mature; and the transition space is full of fragile experiments that are easy to kill, capture, or overhype. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Future possibilities are visible enough to influence strategy but not mature enough to replace current operations immediately.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Future possibilities are visible enough to influence strategy but not mature enough to replace current operations immediately.", "The current system is still active and often still necessary; the future pattern is not yet mature; and the transition space is full of fragile experiments that are easy to kill, capture, or overhype."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Three Horizons Analysis", "one_liner": "Short, medium, long-term transitions.", "page_ref": "prime:three_horizons_analysis", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Future pattern -> H3.", "slug": "three_horizons_analysis", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Horizon three is visible but not ready to replace current operations."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Future possibilities are visible enough to influence strategy but not mature enough to replace current operations immediately.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Horizon two experiments are vulnerable to legacy metrics and incentives.", "role_mapping": "Experiments -> H2.", "slug": "three_horizons_analysis", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b069_a03_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "They judge experiments by current efficiency metrics, treat future aspirations as slogans, overfund the legacy system because it is measurable, or abandon present responsibilities before replacements are ready. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Transitional experiments exist but are judged by the wrong metrics, starved of support, or captured by legacy incentives.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Transitional experiments exist but are judged by the wrong metrics, starved of support, or captured by legacy incentives.", "They judge experiments by current efficiency metrics, treat future aspirations as slogans, overfund the legacy system because it is measurable, or abandon present responsibilities before replacements are ready."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Three Horizons Analysis", "one_liner": "Short, medium, long-term transitions.", "page_ref": "prime:three_horizons_analysis", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Experiments -> H2.", "slug": "three_horizons_analysis", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Horizon two experiments are vulnerable to legacy metrics and incentives."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Transitional experiments exist but are judged by the wrong metrics, starved of support, or captured by legacy incentives.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The method allocates attention across maintain, transition, and future choices.", "role_mapping": "Choices -> horizons.", "slug": "three_horizons_analysis", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b069_a03_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Without a horizon structure, decision makers tend to collapse these roles. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Decision makers need to allocate resources across maintain, migrate, experiment, scale, and retire choices.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Decision makers need to allocate resources across maintain, migrate, experiment, scale, and retire choices.", "Without a horizon structure, decision makers tend to collapse these roles."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Three Horizons Analysis", "one_liner": "Short, medium, long-term transitions.", "page_ref": "prime:three_horizons_analysis", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Choices -> horizons.", "slug": "three_horizons_analysis", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The method allocates attention across maintain, transition, and future choices."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Decision makers need to allocate resources across maintain, migrate, experiment, scale, and retire choices.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Stakeholders disagree because some prioritize reliability, some demand transformation, and some are already investing in future patterns.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The present system must remain functional long enough for transition to be safe, but too much present-system optimization delays the future pattern; too much future enthusiasm destabilizes the present before alternatives are ready. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Stakeholders disagree because some prioritize reliability, some demand transformation, and some are already investing in future patterns. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders disagree because some prioritize reliability, some demand transformation, and some are already investing in future patterns.", "The present system must remain functional long enough for transition to be safe, but too much present-system optimization delays the future pattern; too much future enthusiasm destabilizes the present before alternatives are ready."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Stakeholders disagree because some prioritize reliability, some demand transformation, and some are already investing in future patterns."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 69, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-069", "ledger_sha256": "34e723e381305203d3bf1eb43c975aa66c3f16e08c0407db4bbb62b8c05834a6"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Threshold-Based Activation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:threshold_based_activation", "slug": "threshold_based_activation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 2 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 2}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Threshold-Based Activation applies when a system can observe a changing condition but lacks a reliable bridge from observation to action. The structural problem is not the mere existence of a threshold. The problem is the gap between a signal and an accountable response: too early is wasteful or harmful, too late is dangerous or costly, and inconsistent judgment makes the system unpredictable.\n\nCommon symptoms include alert fatigue, delayed response, inconsistent escalation, dashboard thresholds with no owner, flapping automated responses, and obsolete cutoffs that no one reviews.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system must decide when to move from monitoring to action, but acting too early or too late has costs."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime converts monitored state into discrete activation at a threshold.", "role_mapping": "Condition -> monitor; action -> trigger.", "slug": "threshold_triggered_rule_activation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b069_a04_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "For example, an alert fires, a case escalates, a treatment begins, a system throttles, a team mobilizes, or a process pauses. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A condition is monitored continuously, periodically, or opportunistically, but action must occur discretely. For example, an alert fires, a case escalates, a treatment begins, a system throttles, a team mobilizes, or a process pauses.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A condition is monitored continuously, periodically, or opportunistically, but action must occur discretely. For example, an alert fires, a case escalates, a treatment begins, a system throttles, a team mobilizes, or a process pauses.", "For example, an alert fires, a case escalates, a treatment begins, a system throttles, a team mobilizes, or a process pauses."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Threshold-Triggered Rule Activation", "one_liner": "A continuous observable crossing a threshold flips a dormant rule to active.", "page_ref": "prime:threshold_triggered_rule_activation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Condition -> monitor; action -> trigger.", "slug": "threshold_triggered_rule_activation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime converts monitored state into discrete activation at a threshold."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A condition is monitored continuously, periodically, or opportunistically, but action must occur discretely. For example, an alert fires, a case escalates, a treatment begins, a system throttles, a team mobilizes, or a process pauses.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Activation requires an observable threshold predicate.", "role_mapping": "Evidence -> threshold condition.", "slug": "threshold_triggered_rule_activation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b069_a04_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The system can define an observable condition, level, pattern, duration, or combination of evidence that should justify activation. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The system can define an observable condition, level, pattern, duration, or combination of evidence that should justify activation.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The system can define an observable condition, level, pattern, duration, or combination of evidence that should justify activation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Threshold-Triggered Rule Activation", "one_liner": "A continuous observable crossing a threshold flips a dormant rule to active.", "page_ref": "prime:threshold_triggered_rule_activation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Evidence -> threshold condition.", "slug": "threshold_triggered_rule_activation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Activation requires an observable threshold predicate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The system can define an observable condition, level, pattern, duration, or combination of evidence that should justify activation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Acting too early creates cost, fatigue, burden, restriction, false alarms, or unnecessary intervention.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Acting too early creates cost, fatigue, burden, restriction, false alarms, or unnecessary intervention. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Acting too early creates cost, fatigue, burden, restriction, false alarms, or unnecessary intervention."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "Acting too early creates cost, fatigue, burden, restriction, false alarms, or unnecessary intervention."}, {"display_text": "Acting too late creates harm, overload, deterioration, missed opportunity, delay, rupture, or loss of control.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Acting too late creates harm, overload, deterioration, missed opportunity, delay, rupture, or loss of control. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Acting too late creates harm, overload, deterioration, missed opportunity, delay, rupture, or loss of control."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Acting too late creates harm, overload, deterioration, missed opportunity, delay, rupture, or loss of control."}, {"display_text": "The response can be specified in advance, including scope, intensity, timing, authority, and deactivation or review logic.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this feasibility condition: The response can be specified in advance, including scope, intensity, timing, authority, and deactivation or review logic. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The response can be specified in advance, including scope, intensity, timing, authority, and deactivation or review logic."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The response can be specified in advance, including scope, intensity, timing, authority, and deactivation or review logic."}, {"display_text": "The threshold can be recalibrated when evidence shows too many false positives, false negatives, gaming, stale assumptions, or changed operating conditions.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this deployment constraint: The threshold can be recalibrated when evidence shows too many false positives, false negatives, gaming, stale assumptions, or changed operating conditions. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The threshold can be recalibrated when evidence shows too many false positives, false negatives, gaming, stale assumptions, or changed operating conditions."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The threshold can be recalibrated when evidence shows too many false positives, false negatives, gaming, stale assumptions, or changed operating conditions."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 69, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-069", "ledger_sha256": "34e723e381305203d3bf1eb43c975aa66c3f16e08c0407db4bbb62b8c05834a6"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Threshold-Refresh State Maintenance", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:threshold_refresh_state_maintenance", "slug": "threshold_refresh_state_maintenance"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 5, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A useful state is present but fragile. It decays with time, distraction, load, turnover, expiry, inactivity, or context switching. If left alone it crosses a disappearance threshold and becomes unavailable; if heavily processed it may be changed, overlearned, repaired, or transformed into a different state. The system therefore needs a minimal refresh loop that preserves near-term availability without pretending to create durable mastery, restored reference integrity, or long-term consolidation.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A useful state is present but fragile. It decays with time, distraction, load, turnover, expiry, inactivity, or context switching. If left alone it crosses a disappearance threshold and becomes unavailable; if heavily processed it may be changed, overlearned, repaired, or transformed into a different state. The system therefore needs a minimal refresh loop that preserves near-term availability without pretending to create durable mastery, restored reference integrity, or long-term consolidation."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Maintenance rehearsal keeps a state immediately accessible over a short interval.", "role_mapping": "State -> maintained representation.", "slug": "maintenance_rehearsal", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b069_a05_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A state is valuable only if it remains immediately accessible for a bounded upcoming interval. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A state is valuable only if it remains immediately accessible for a bounded upcoming interval."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Maintenance Rehearsal", "one_liner": "Holding a decay-prone state above its disappearance threshold by repeated low-cost refresh actions that re-assert it without enriching or moving it.", "page_ref": "prime:maintenance_rehearsal", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "State -> maintained representation.", "slug": "maintenance_rehearsal", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Maintenance rehearsal keeps a state immediately accessible over a short interval."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A state is valuable only if it remains immediately accessible for a bounded upcoming interval.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Predictable fading determines rehearsal cadence.", "role_mapping": "Fade -> refresh window.", "slug": "maintenance_rehearsal", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b069_a05_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The refresh loop must be strong enough to prevent disappearance but weak enough not to transform the state or create a false claim of durability. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The state fades, expires, cools, or is overwritten predictably enough to set a refresh window.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The state fades, expires, cools, or is overwritten predictably enough to set a refresh window.", "The refresh loop must be strong enough to prevent disappearance but weak enough not to transform the state or create a false claim of durability."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Maintenance Rehearsal", "one_liner": "Holding a decay-prone state above its disappearance threshold by repeated low-cost refresh actions that re-assert it without enriching or moving it.", "page_ref": "prime:maintenance_rehearsal", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Fade -> refresh window.", "slug": "maintenance_rehearsal", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Predictable fading determines rehearsal cadence."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The state fades, expires, cools, or is overwritten predictably enough to set a refresh window.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Small repetition refreshes the state without reconstruction.", "role_mapping": "Repeat -> refresh.", "slug": "maintenance_rehearsal", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b069_a05_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The same action that keeps a state alive can also consume attention, hide decay, or subtly change what is being preserved. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A small repeated action can reassert the state without expensive repair or full rework.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A small repeated action can reassert the state without expensive repair or full rework.", "The same action that keeps a state alive can also consume attention, hide decay, or subtly change what is being preserved."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Maintenance Rehearsal", "one_liner": "Holding a decay-prone state above its disappearance threshold by repeated low-cost refresh actions that re-assert it without enriching or moving it.", "page_ref": "prime:maintenance_rehearsal", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Repeat -> refresh.", "slug": "maintenance_rehearsal", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Small repetition refreshes the state without reconstruction."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A small repeated action can reassert the state without expensive repair or full rework.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "It preserves rather than transforms or improves the state.", "role_mapping": "Same state -> maintenance.", "slug": "maintenance_rehearsal", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b069_a05_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The same action that keeps a state alive can also consume attention, hide decay, or subtly change what is being preserved. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The task requires preserving the same state, not improving it, interpreting it, or moving it to a new representation.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The task requires preserving the same state, not improving it, interpreting it, or moving it to a new representation.", "The same action that keeps a state alive can also consume attention, hide decay, or subtly change what is being preserved."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Maintenance Rehearsal", "one_liner": "Holding a decay-prone state above its disappearance threshold by repeated low-cost refresh actions that re-assert it without enriching or moving it.", "page_ref": "prime:maintenance_rehearsal", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Same state -> maintenance.", "slug": "maintenance_rehearsal", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "It preserves rather than transforms or improves the state."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The task requires preserving the same state, not improving it, interpreting it, or moving it to a new representation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Lapse detection is required before relying on the rehearsed state.", "role_mapping": "Lapse -> maintenance failure.", "slug": "maintenance_rehearsal", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b069_a05_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The system can detect lapse, staleness, or drift before relying on the maintained state. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The system can detect lapse, staleness, or drift before relying on the maintained state."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Maintenance Rehearsal", "one_liner": "Holding a decay-prone state above its disappearance threshold by repeated low-cost refresh actions that re-assert it without enriching or moving it.", "page_ref": "prime:maintenance_rehearsal", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Lapse -> maintenance failure.", "slug": "maintenance_rehearsal", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Lapse detection is required before relying on the rehearsed state."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The system can detect lapse, staleness, or drift before relying on the maintained state.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Long-term consolidation, deep rehearsal, or conservation treatment would be too costly, too slow, or inappropriate for the need.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The system therefore needs a minimal refresh loop that preserves near-term availability without pretending to create durable mastery, restored reference integrity, or long-term consolidation. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: Long-term consolidation, deep rehearsal, or conservation treatment would be too costly, too slow, or inappropriate for the need. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Long-term consolidation, deep rehearsal, or conservation treatment would be too costly, too slow, or inappropriate for the need.", "The system therefore needs a minimal refresh loop that preserves near-term availability without pretending to create durable mastery, restored reference integrity, or long-term consolidation."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Long-term consolidation, deep rehearsal, or conservation treatment would be too costly, too slow, or inappropriate for the need."}, {"display_text": "There is a bounded stop point, handoff, or conversion point so the refresh loop does not become endless maintenance debt.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The refresh loop must be strong enough to prevent disappearance but weak enough not to transform the state or create a false claim of durability. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: There is a bounded stop point, handoff, or conversion point so the refresh loop does not become endless maintenance debt. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["There is a bounded stop point, handoff, or conversion point so the refresh loop does not become endless maintenance debt.", "The refresh loop must be strong enough to prevent disappearance but weak enough not to transform the state or create a false claim of durability."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "There is a bounded stop point, handoff, or conversion point so the refresh loop does not become endless maintenance debt."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 69, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-069", "ledger_sha256": "34e723e381305203d3bf1eb43c975aa66c3f16e08c0407db4bbb62b8c05834a6"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Tiered Escalation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:tiered_escalation", "slug": "tiered_escalation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 6, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 6, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "6 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is mismatched handling level. Some matters are handled too high, wasting scarce attention and slowing routine resolution. Other matters are handled too low, creating unsafe decisions, unresolved complexity, illegitimate authority use, or delayed response. Still others move between levels through informal influence, panic, visibility, status, or personal relationships rather than stable criteria.\n\nThis problem often appears as a simultaneous overload-and-neglect pattern: higher tiers complain that everything reaches them, while lower tiers complain that they lack authority or support; high-risk cases wait too long, while low-risk cases are over-reviewed; escalations bounce among teams because no one owns the handoff; appeals exist on paper but do not produce meaningful review.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Issues, cases, decisions, incidents, requests, or disputes differ in severity, scope, complexity, authority requirement, expertise requirement, and resource need, but the system lacks a disciplined path for keeping routine matters local and moving exceptional matters to a higher competent level."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Tiering protects central capacity from routine cases.", "role_mapping": "Central authority -> high tier.", "slug": "local_autonomy_tiered_escalation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b069_a06_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Some matters are handled too high, wasting scarce attention and slowing routine resolution. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A central authority, specialist team, court, administrator, or senior role is overloaded by routine matters.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A central authority, specialist team, court, administrator, or senior role is overloaded by routine matters.", "Some matters are handled too high, wasting scarce attention and slowing routine resolution."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Local Autonomy & Tiered Escalation", "one_liner": "Escalate when needed.", "page_ref": "prime:local_autonomy_tiered_escalation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Central authority -> high tier.", "slug": "local_autonomy_tiered_escalation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Tiering protects central capacity from routine cases."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A central authority, specialist team, court, administrator, or senior role is overloaded by routine matters.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Local limits define when escalation is needed.", "role_mapping": "Front line -> local tier; exceeded limit -> escalation.", "slug": "local_autonomy_tiered_escalation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b069_a06_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The archetype is useful when cases vary in severity, complexity, authority requirement, urgency, expertise need, or resource need. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Front-line actors repeatedly encounter cases that exceed their authority, competence, tools, or risk tolerance.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Front-line actors repeatedly encounter cases that exceed their authority, competence, tools, or risk tolerance.", "The archetype is useful when cases vary in severity, complexity, authority requirement, urgency, expertise need, or resource need."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Local Autonomy & Tiered Escalation", "one_liner": "Escalate when needed.", "page_ref": "prime:local_autonomy_tiered_escalation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Front line -> local tier; exceeded limit -> escalation.", "slug": "local_autonomy_tiered_escalation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Local limits define when escalation is needed."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Front-line actors repeatedly encounter cases that exceed their authority, competence, tools, or risk tolerance.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Explicit criteria replace personal or political bypasses.", "role_mapping": "Criteria -> routing rule.", "slug": "local_autonomy_tiered_escalation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b069_a06_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Still others move between levels through informal influence, panic, visibility, status, or personal relationships rather than stable criteria. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Escalation happens through personal relationships, panic, visibility, politics, or informal bypasses rather than criteria.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Escalation happens through personal relationships, panic, visibility, politics, or informal bypasses rather than criteria.", "Still others move between levels through informal influence, panic, visibility, status, or personal relationships rather than stable criteria."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Local Autonomy & Tiered Escalation", "one_liner": "Escalate when needed.", "page_ref": "prime:local_autonomy_tiered_escalation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Criteria -> routing rule.", "slug": "local_autonomy_tiered_escalation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Explicit criteria replace personal or political bypasses."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Escalation happens through personal relationships, panic, visibility, politics, or informal bypasses rather than criteria.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Issue classes map to distinct tiers and standards.", "role_mapping": "Class -> response tier.", "slug": "local_autonomy_tiered_escalation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b069_a06_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Issues, cases, decisions, incidents, requests, or disputes differ in severity, scope, complexity, authority requirement, expertise requirement, and resource need, but the system lacks a disciplined path for keeping routine matters local and moving exceptional matters to a higher competent level. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Different classes of issues need different response times, evidence standards, approval levels, or expertise.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Different classes of issues need different response times, evidence standards, approval levels, or expertise.", "Issues, cases, decisions, incidents, requests, or disputes differ in severity, scope, complexity, authority requirement, expertise requirement, and resource need, but the system lacks a disciplined path for keeping routine matters local and moving exceptional matters to a higher competent level."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Local Autonomy & Tiered Escalation", "one_liner": "Escalate when needed.", "page_ref": "prime:local_autonomy_tiered_escalation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Class -> response tier.", "slug": "local_autonomy_tiered_escalation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Issue classes map to distinct tiers and standards."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Different classes of issues need different response times, evidence standards, approval levels, or expertise.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Appeal and exception handling are higher-tier functions.", "role_mapping": "Appeal -> escalation.", "slug": "local_autonomy_tiered_escalation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b069_a06_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "An appeals system wants lower-tier finality for ordinary decisions but higher review for contested or exceptional decisions. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Lower-level decisions sometimes need appeal, exception handling, review, or higher authorization.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Lower-level decisions sometimes need appeal, exception handling, review, or higher authorization.", "An appeals system wants lower-tier finality for ordinary decisions but higher review for contested or exceptional decisions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Local Autonomy & Tiered Escalation", "one_liner": "Escalate when needed.", "page_ref": "prime:local_autonomy_tiered_escalation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Appeal -> escalation.", "slug": "local_autonomy_tiered_escalation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Appeal and exception handling are higher-tier functions."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Lower-level decisions sometimes need appeal, exception handling, review, or higher authorization.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Healthy tiering returns decisions while preserving local context.", "role_mapping": "Return -> de-escalation.", "slug": "local_autonomy_tiered_escalation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b069_a06_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Issues, cases, decisions, incidents, requests, or disputes differ in severity, scope, complexity, authority requirement, expertise requirement, and resource need, but the system lacks a disciplined path for keeping routine matters local and moving exceptional matters to a higher competent level. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Cases move upward but never return, or higher tiers decide without preserving local context.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Cases move upward but never return, or higher tiers decide without preserving local context.", "Issues, cases, decisions, incidents, requests, or disputes differ in severity, scope, complexity, authority requirement, expertise requirement, and resource need, but the system lacks a disciplined path for keeping routine matters local and moving exceptional matters to a higher competent level."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Local Autonomy & Tiered Escalation", "one_liner": "Escalate when needed.", "page_ref": "prime:local_autonomy_tiered_escalation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Return -> de-escalation.", "slug": "local_autonomy_tiered_escalation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Healthy tiering returns decisions while preserving local context."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Cases move upward but never return, or higher tiers decide without preserving local context.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 69, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-069", "ledger_sha256": "34e723e381305203d3bf1eb43c975aa66c3f16e08c0407db4bbb62b8c05834a6"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Time Series Cross-Section Analysis", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:time_series_cross_section_analysis", "slug": "time_series_cross_section_analysis"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 2, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A comparison must explain change or difference across cases, but the evidence is vulnerable to conflating temporal trends, stable unit characteristics, shared period shocks, measurement changes, and true intervention or exposure effects.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A comparison must explain change or difference across cases, but the evidence is vulnerable to conflating temporal trends, stable unit characteristics, shared period shocks, measurement changes, and true intervention or exposure effects."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P104-C02", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O9"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O10"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O11"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve entities as the objects observed and moments as the temporal observation positions.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Observational entities and observation moments are distinct roles.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must require multiple entities rather than repeated observation of only one entity.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "More than one observational entity is included.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve repeated temporal observation rather than a one-time cross section.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "Each entity can be observed at repeated moments.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve observational possibility without strengthening it to completed measurement.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The repeated observations are possible rather than asserted as already completed.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when multiple cases are repeatedly observed.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The observational entities are cases.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when multiple units are repeatedly observed.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The observational entities are units.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when multiple places are repeatedly observed.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The observational entities are places.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when multiple organizations are repeatedly observed.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The observational entities are organizations.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when multiple cohorts are repeatedly observed.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "The observational entities are cohorts.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when multiple assets are repeatedly observed.", "obligation_id": "O10", "statement": "The observational entities are assets.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when multiple populations are repeatedly observed.", "obligation_id": "O11", "statement": "The observational entities are populations.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Multiple observational entities of a listed type can each be observed at repeated moments.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "multiple entities are repeatedly observed over time", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P104-C02-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Monitoring can observe one unit only.", "slug": "monitoring"}], "residual_id": "r:time_series_cross_section_analysis:b069_a07_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b069_a07_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Multiple cases, units, places, organizations, cohorts, assets, or populations can be observed at repeated moments. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Multiple cases, units, places, organizations, cohorts, assets, or populations can be observed at repeated moments."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "AGREED_DIRECT", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "A purported DiD with only one group or without both groups observed before and after is only a before-after comparison and fails the exact DSA.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Difference-in-Differences", "one_liner": "Estimate a causal effect from observational data by subtracting the control group's before-after change from the treatment group's, netting out time-invariant unit confounders and common time trends — valid only if parallel trends holds.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:difference_in_differences", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "difference_in_differences"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "difference_in_differences", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P104-C02-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact two-group, two-period skeleton necessarily satisfies the unit branch for repeated observational units."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "Without multiple groups measured at baseline and after, the opposite-verdict change-score versus ANCOVA standoff cannot instantiate Lord's paradox.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Lord's Paradox", "one_liner": "Show that two arithmetically correct analyses of the same pre-post data — raw change scores versus baseline adjustment — can reach opposite verdicts about an effect, because adjustment is a causal-modeling choice and the two answer different questions depending on whether baseline is itself caused by group membership.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:lords_paradox", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "lords_paradox"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "lords_paradox", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P104-C02-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact DSA necessarily contains multiple pre/post cohorts and therefore directly satisfies the cohort branch despite Pass B's shortlist rejection."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Multiple cases, units, places, organizations, cohorts, assets, or populations can be observed at repeated moments.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Comparative method need not estimate repeated differential change.", "slug": "comparative_method"}], "residual_id": "r:time_series_cross_section_analysis:b069_a07_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b069_a07_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The question asks whether one unit changed differently from others, not merely whether it changed at all. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The question asks whether one unit changed differently from others, not merely whether it changed at all."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Comparative method need not estimate repeated differential change.", "slug": "comparative_method"}], "normalized_requirement": "The question asks whether one unit changed differently from others, not merely whether it changed at all.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The question asks whether one unit changed differently from others, not merely whether it changed at all.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P104-C03", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve units, cross-sectional differences, and the focal exposure whose effect is being assessed.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Observed units differ cross-sectionally and are associated with an exposure under study.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve time-stable or enduring unit traits rather than transient influences.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The alternative explanatory traits are stable properties of the units.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail a causal explanation from stable unit traits to the observed differences.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The stable unit traits can cause the observed cross-sectional differences.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the rival attribution that displaces or confounds the exposure explanation.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The stable traits may explain the differences instead of the exposure under study.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the source's possibility claim without strengthening it to established causation.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "Causation by stable traits is possible rather than asserted as certain.", "type": "MODALITY"}], "predicate": "Cross-sectional differences may be caused by stable unit traits rather than the exposure under study.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "stable unit traits may explain cross-sectional differences instead of exposure", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P104-C03-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Selection bias need not be time-invariant.", "slug": "selection_bias"}], "residual_id": "r:time_series_cross_section_analysis:b069_a07_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b069_a07_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Cross-sectional contrast supplies difference but can ignore history; time-series evidence supplies history but can lack a counterfactual comparison. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Cross-sectional differences may be caused by stable unit traits rather than the exposure under study.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Cross-sectional differences may be caused by stable unit traits rather than the exposure under study.", "Cross-sectional contrast supplies difference but can ignore history; time-series evidence supplies history but can lack a counterfactual comparison."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Selection bias need not be time-invariant.", "slug": "selection_bias"}], "normalized_requirement": "Cross-sectional differences may be caused by stable unit traits rather than the exposure under study.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Cross-sectional differences may be caused by stable unit traits rather than the exposure under study.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P104-C04", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O8"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O9"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5", "O10"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve multiple units and one temporal condition common to them.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Multiple units share exposure to one temporal condition.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail a possible effect from the common temporal condition to the units.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The shared temporal condition can affect the units.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve universal coverage across the observed units rather than a subset-specific effect.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The possible effect extends to all units.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the simultaneous or common-period character of the effect.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The common effect can occur across the units at once.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the source's possibility claim.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The shared effect is possible rather than asserted as certain.", "type": "MODALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by a shared time shock.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The shared temporal condition is a time shock.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by a shared cycle.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The shared temporal condition is a cycle.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by a shared season.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The shared temporal condition is a season.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by a shared policy environment.", "obligation_id": "O9", "statement": "The shared temporal condition is a policy environment.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by a shared historical event.", "obligation_id": "O10", "statement": "The shared temporal condition is a historical event.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "One shared temporal condition could affect all units at once.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "shared temporal condition may simultaneously affect every unit", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P104-C04-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Teleconnection is not necessarily a common time shock.", "slug": "teleconnection"}], "residual_id": "r:time_series_cross_section_analysis:b069_a07_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b069_a07_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A comparison must explain change or difference across cases, but the evidence is vulnerable to conflating temporal trends, stable unit characteristics, shared period shocks, measurement changes, and true intervention or exposure effects. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A shared time shock, cycle, season, policy environment, or historical event could affect all units at once.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A shared time shock, cycle, season, policy environment, or historical event could affect all units at once.", "A comparison must explain change or difference across cases, but the evidence is vulnerable to conflating temporal trends, stable unit characteristics, shared period shocks, measurement changes, and true intervention or exposure effects."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "If a shock moved only an unrelated subset and the positions did not share its factor loading, the portfolio would not have the exact rank-one concentration-illusion signature.", "edge_tier": "DIRECT", "name": "Concentration Illusion", "one_liner": "The failure where a portfolio looks diversified across many labels but its holdings share a hidden common factor — so a single shock moves them together and realized risk tracks the rank of the factor-exposure matrix, not the count of positions.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:concentration_illusion", "qualifier": null, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "concentration_illusion"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "concentration_illusion", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P104-C04-U1", "why_it_fits": "The exact DSA directly requires the common-shock, all-holdings, simultaneous-movement branch."}, {"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_A", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "An infrastructure-only compound event fails the guard; after the guard selects a shared time-shock driver, no complete instance can lack the common cause or simultaneous affected hazards.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Compound-Hazard Stacking", "one_liner": "The planning failure in which co-occurring hazards interact through shared drivers, infrastructure, or response resources, so their joint impact exceeds — and the available capacity falls below — what a plan built from independent single-hazard analyses predicts.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:compound_hazard_stacking", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "shared_driver_is_time_shock", "predicate": "The shared hazard driver is a time shock.", "rationale": "The exact record and emitted expression satisfy one complete DNF branch under universal necessity, and the qualifier is atomic, candidate-anchored, and non-laundering."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "compound_hazard_stacking"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "shared_driver_is_time_shock"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "compound_hazard_stacking", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P104-C04-U1", "why_it_fits": "A repaired obligation audit retains Pass A's atomic context guard while correctly treating the shared temporal driver, causal reach, all-hazards scope, and branch type as guard-supplied."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A shared time shock, cycle, season, policy environment, or historical event could affect all units at once.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Simpson reversal need not involve time trajectories.", "slug": "simpsons_paradox"}], "residual_id": "r:time_series_cross_section_analysis:b069_a07_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b069_a07_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A comparison must explain change or difference across cases, but the evidence is vulnerable to conflating temporal trends, stable unit characteristics, shared period shocks, measurement changes, and true intervention or exposure effects. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A trend visible in aggregate could hide diverging trajectories among subgroups or cases.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A trend visible in aggregate could hide diverging trajectories among subgroups or cases.", "A comparison must explain change or difference across cases, but the evidence is vulnerable to conflating temporal trends, stable unit characteristics, shared period shocks, measurement changes, and true intervention or exposure effects."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Simpson reversal need not involve time trajectories.", "slug": "simpsons_paradox"}], "normalized_requirement": "A trend visible in aggregate could hide diverging trajectories among subgroups or cases.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A trend visible in aggregate could hide diverging trajectories among subgroups or cases.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Data availability is uneven across units or periods and the design must state what comparisons remain valid.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A comparison must explain change or difference across cases, but the evidence is vulnerable to conflating temporal trends, stable unit characteristics, shared period shocks, measurement changes, and true intervention or exposure effects. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: Data availability is uneven across units or periods and the design must state what comparisons remain valid. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Data availability is uneven across units or periods and the design must state what comparisons remain valid.", "A comparison must explain change or difference across cases, but the evidence is vulnerable to conflating temporal trends, stable unit characteristics, shared period shocks, measurement changes, and true intervention or exposure effects."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Data availability is uneven across units or periods and the design must state what comparisons remain valid."}, {"display_text": "Decision makers need a comparative basis for claims about policy, performance, intervention, risk, or trajectory.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this goal: Decision makers need a comparative basis for claims about policy, performance, intervention, risk, or trajectory. It supplies a criterion for evaluating what the intervention should accomplish or preserve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Decision makers need a comparative basis for claims about policy, performance, intervention, risk, or trajectory."]}, "function": "GOAL", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because a goal states an intended outcome or evaluation criterion, not a pre-existing situation that independently summons the archetype.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "Decision makers need a comparative basis for claims about policy, performance, intervention, risk, or trajectory."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 69, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-069", "ledger_sha256": "34e723e381305203d3bf1eb43c975aa66c3f16e08c0407db4bbb62b8c05834a6"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Tipping Point Prevention", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:tipping_point_prevention", "slug": "tipping_point_prevention"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 5, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a mismatch between apparent stability and latent transition risk. The system may continue to function, but its margin is shrinking. Reinforcing feedback, accumulated stress, weak points, depletion, or confidence effects can make a small additional perturbation trigger a different regime.\n\nThe organizational problem is equally important: prevention must often happen before the crisis is publicly undeniable. That creates pressure to wait, discount weak signals, or defend the status quo. The archetype therefore combines technical sensing with governance: someone must be able to act before proof arrives too late.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system may look tolerable or only mildly stressed while it approaches a critical threshold where small additional pressure can trigger a sudden transition into an undesirable, self-reinforcing, or difficult-to-reverse state."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A tipping point separates a controllable state from a worse regime.", "role_mapping": "States -> pre and post threshold.", "slug": "tipping_points_or_phase_transitions", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b069_a08_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when crossing the threshold is undesirable, likely to be nonlinear, and hard to reverse. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The post-threshold state is substantially worse, less controllable, or more costly to reverse than the pre-threshold state.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The post-threshold state is substantially worse, less controllable, or more costly to reverse than the pre-threshold state.", "Use this archetype when crossing the threshold is undesirable, likely to be nonlinear, and hard to reverse."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Tipping Points (or Phase Transitions)", "one_liner": "Abrupt state change.", "page_ref": "prime:tipping_points_or_phase_transitions", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "States -> pre and post threshold.", "slug": "tipping_points_or_phase_transitions", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A tipping point separates a controllable state from a worse regime."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The post-threshold state is substantially worse, less controllable, or more costly to reverse than the pre-threshold state.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The transition is abrupt nonlinear and often hysteretic.", "role_mapping": "Behavior -> phase transition.", "slug": "tipping_points_or_phase_transitions", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b069_a08_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system may look tolerable or only mildly stressed while it approaches a critical threshold where small additional pressure can trigger a sudden transition into an undesirable, self-reinforcing, or difficult-to-reverse state. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The transition has nonlinear, abrupt, cascading, self-reinforcing, or hysteretic behavior rather than simple gradual deterioration.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The transition has nonlinear, abrupt, cascading, self-reinforcing, or hysteretic behavior rather than simple gradual deterioration.", "A system may look tolerable or only mildly stressed while it approaches a critical threshold where small additional pressure can trigger a sudden transition into an undesirable, self-reinforcing, or difficult-to-reverse state."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Tipping Points (or Phase Transitions)", "one_liner": "Abrupt state change.", "page_ref": "prime:tipping_points_or_phase_transitions", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Behavior -> phase transition.", "slug": "tipping_points_or_phase_transitions", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The transition is abrupt nonlinear and often hysteretic."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The transition has nonlinear, abrupt, cascading, self-reinforcing, or hysteretic behavior rather than simple gradual deterioration.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Near-threshold signals can reveal rising transition risk.", "role_mapping": "Leading signal -> proximity.", "slug": "tipping_points_or_phase_transitions", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b069_a08_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The structural problem is a mismatch between apparent stability and latent transition risk. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: There are leading or near-leading signals that can reveal increasing tipping risk before full transition.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["There are leading or near-leading signals that can reveal increasing tipping risk before full transition.", "The structural problem is a mismatch between apparent stability and latent transition risk."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Tipping Points (or Phase Transitions)", "one_liner": "Abrupt state change.", "page_ref": "prime:tipping_points_or_phase_transitions", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Leading signal -> proximity.", "slug": "tipping_points_or_phase_transitions", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Near-threshold signals can reveal rising transition risk."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "There are leading or near-leading signals that can reveal increasing tipping risk before full transition.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Before crossing, stress reduction or buffering can change trajectory.", "role_mapping": "Prevention -> threshold distance.", "slug": "tipping_points_or_phase_transitions", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b069_a08_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The pattern requires a meaningful post-threshold state, credible warning signals, a prevention window, and concrete actions that can reduce the chance or severity of crossing. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Preventive action can still reduce stressors, damp feedback, increase buffers, or slow the approach to the threshold.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Preventive action can still reduce stressors, damp feedback, increase buffers, or slow the approach to the threshold.", "The pattern requires a meaningful post-threshold state, credible warning signals, a prevention window, and concrete actions that can reduce the chance or severity of crossing."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Tipping Points (or Phase Transitions)", "one_liner": "Abrupt state change.", "page_ref": "prime:tipping_points_or_phase_transitions", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Prevention -> threshold distance.", "slug": "tipping_points_or_phase_transitions", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Before crossing, stress reduction or buffering can change trajectory."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Preventive action can still reduce stressors, damp feedback, increase buffers, or slow the approach to the threshold.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Delay until conclusive post-transition evidence defeats prevention.", "role_mapping": "Proof delay -> missed window.", "slug": "tipping_points_or_phase_transitions", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b069_a08_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It fits cases where waiting for certainty would make intervention too late: ecological regime shifts, financial crises, burnout cascades, clinical deterioration, conflict escalation, and infrastructure collapse. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Waiting for conclusive proof would likely leave too little time for effective intervention.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Waiting for conclusive proof would likely leave too little time for effective intervention.", "It fits cases where waiting for certainty would make intervention too late: ecological regime shifts, financial crises, burnout cascades, clinical deterioration, conflict escalation, and infrastructure collapse."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Tipping Points (or Phase Transitions)", "one_liner": "Abrupt state change.", "page_ref": "prime:tipping_points_or_phase_transitions", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Proof delay -> missed window.", "slug": "tipping_points_or_phase_transitions", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Delay until conclusive post-transition evidence defeats prevention."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Waiting for conclusive proof would likely leave too little time for effective intervention.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 69, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-069", "ledger_sha256": "34e723e381305203d3bf1eb43c975aa66c3f16e08c0407db4bbb62b8c05834a6"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Titrated Intervention", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:titrated_intervention", "slug": "titrated_intervention"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 1, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 3 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is an intensity mismatch under uncertainty. A chosen intervention may be directionally right, but the amount of it is unknown. Too little intensity produces no visible change and can create the false conclusion that the mechanism failed. Too much intensity can create overload, backlash, side effects, wasted resources, or irreversible harm.\n\nThe actor is caught between decisiveness and caution. A one-shot full-force intervention maximizes commitment but discards learning. A timid intervention preserves safety but may never reach the effective range. Titration resolves this by making intensity selection iterative, bounded, and evidence-guided.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "An intervention can help or harm depending on intensity, but the right level is not known upfront. Full-force action risks overshoot and side effects; timid action risks no meaningful effect; fixed plans ignore what the system reveals during application."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P104-C05", "dnf": [], "enumeration_semantics": "ILLUSTRATIVE_MANIFESTATIONS", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [], "predicate": "The intervention has an adjustable intensity dimension.", "resolution": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RESIDUAL", "semantic_scope": "NON_ABSTRACTION", "structural_head": "intervention intensity is adjustable", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P104-C05-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Proportionality can compare fixed actions.", "slug": "proportionality"}], "residual_id": "r:titrated_intervention:b069_a09_c1", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b069_a09_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The dimension might be amount, frequency, strictness, exposure share, scope, training load, staffing level, alert sensitivity, incentive strength, or policy enforcement intensity. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The intervention has an adjustable intensity dimension such as amount, frequency, scope, strictness, sensitivity, load, staffing level, budget, or exposure share.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The intervention has an adjustable intensity dimension such as amount, frequency, scope, strictness, sensitivity, load, staffing level, budget, or exposure share.", "The dimension might be amount, frequency, strictness, exposure share, scope, training load, staffing level, alert sensitivity, incentive strength, or policy enforcement intensity."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RECLASSIFIED", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 1, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Proportionality can compare fixed actions.", "slug": "proportionality"}], "normalized_requirement": "The intervention has an adjustable intensity dimension such as amount, frequency, scope, strictness, sensitivity, load, staffing level, budget, or exposure share.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "NON_ABSTRACTION_RECLASSIFIED", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later candidate-blind atomization classified this remainder as a threshold, parameter, materiality test, or other non-abstraction rather than a catalog gap."}, "predicate": "The intervention has an adjustable intensity dimension such as amount, frequency, scope, strictness, sensitivity, load, staffing level, budget, or exposure share.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Overshoot can occur in a system without an adjustable intervention.", "slug": "overshoot_and_collapse"}], "residual_id": "r:titrated_intervention:b069_a09_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b069_a09_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Too much intensity can create overload, backlash, side effects, wasted resources, or irreversible harm. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Overshooting the useful range would create meaningful cost, harm, resistance, instability, waste, or loss of trust.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Overshooting the useful range would create meaningful cost, harm, resistance, instability, waste, or loss of trust.", "Too much intensity can create overload, backlash, side effects, wasted resources, or irreversible harm."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Overshoot can occur in a system without an adjustable intervention.", "slug": "overshoot_and_collapse"}], "normalized_requirement": "Overshooting the useful range would create meaningful cost, harm, resistance, instability, waste, or loss of trust.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Overshooting the useful range would create meaningful cost, harm, resistance, instability, waste, or loss of trust.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P104-C06", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve an intervention, its applied intensity, and a useful range.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An intervention has an applied intensity and a useful intensity range.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve undershoot below a useful range rather than overshoot or arbitrary variation.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The applied intensity falls below the useful range.", "type": "COMPARISON"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail the below-range intensity as the counterfactual cause of the adverse outcome.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The undershoot would produce one of the stated adverse outcomes.", "type": "CAUSALITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when undershoot leaves the important target problem untreated.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The undershoot would leave an important problem untreated.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when undershoot falsely supports an ineffectiveness conclusion.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The undershoot would create false evidence that the intervention does not work.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Setting an intervention below its useful intensity range would leave an important problem untreated or falsely indicate that the intervention does not work.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "intervention undershoot causes untreated need or false evidence of ineffectiveness", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P104-C06-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Counterfactual subtraction does not entail adjustable dosage.", "slug": "counterfactual_subtraction"}], "residual_id": "r:titrated_intervention:b069_a09_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b069_a09_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A timid intervention preserves safety but may never reach the effective range. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Undershooting the useful range would leave an important problem untreated or create false evidence that the intervention “does not work.”", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Undershooting the useful range would leave an important problem untreated or create false evidence that the intervention “does not work.”", "A timid intervention preserves safety but may never reach the effective range."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Counterfactual subtraction does not entail adjustable dosage.", "slug": "counterfactual_subtraction"}], "normalized_requirement": "Undershooting the useful range would leave an important problem untreated or create false evidence that the intervention “does not work.”", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Undershooting the useful range would leave an important problem untreated or create false evidence that the intervention “does not work.”", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The target system can provide interpretable response signals after each change, even if those signals are delayed or noisy.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially valuable in risk-sensitive systems where response may be nonlinear, delayed, heterogeneous across groups, or affected by tolerance and saturation. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: The target system can provide interpretable response signals after each change, even if those signals are delayed or noisy. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The target system can provide interpretable response signals after each change, even if those signals are delayed or noisy.", "It is especially valuable in risk-sensitive systems where response may be nonlinear, delayed, heterogeneous across groups, or affected by tolerance and saturation."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "The target system can provide interpretable response signals after each change, even if those signals are delayed or noisy."}, {"display_text": "The actor can pause, hold, reverse, or modify intensity rather than being locked into an irreversible full commitment.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A one-shot full-force intervention maximizes commitment but discards learning. In this archetype, the relevant deployment constraint is: The actor can pause, hold, reverse, or modify intensity rather than being locked into an irreversible full commitment. It identifies a boundary that responsible implementation must respect.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The actor can pause, hold, reverse, or modify intensity rather than being locked into an irreversible full commitment.", "A one-shot full-force intervention maximizes commitment but discards learning."]}, "function": "DEPLOYMENT_CONSTRAINT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it constrains how the intervention must be deployed, not the situation that calls for it.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The actor can pause, hold, reverse, or modify intensity rather than being locked into an irreversible full commitment."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 69, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-069", "ledger_sha256": "34e723e381305203d3bf1eb43c975aa66c3f16e08c0407db4bbb62b8c05834a6"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Tolerance Band Management", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:tolerance_band_management", "slug": "tolerance_band_management"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 6, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 6, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "6 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is unmanaged variation. Some deviation is inevitable and may be acceptable, but the system lacks a reliable way to decide which variation preserves function and which variation breaks it. Without a band, actors oscillate between two bad responses: they either over-control harmless variation and create unnecessary cost, or under-control harmful variation until defects, unfairness, or incompatibility accumulate.\n\nThis problem appears whenever a system must coordinate across imperfect production, uncertain measurement, repeated service delivery, or human judgment. The deeper tension is that reality varies, but downstream systems still require dependable bounds.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Components, measurements, processes, or behaviors vary, and the system needs to know which variation is acceptable and which breaks function. Without a managed band, actors either over-control harmless variation, under-control harmful variation, or negotiate exceptions informally after damage has already occurred."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Engineering tolerances govern naturally varying parts or outputs.", "role_mapping": "Variation -> measured dimension.", "slug": "engineering_tolerances", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b069_a10_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use Tolerance Band Management when parts, processes, services, behaviors, evaluations, or measurements vary and the system must distinguish harmless variation from harmful deviation. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The system includes parts, measurements, behaviors, services, judgments, or outputs that naturally vary across time, people, instruments, suppliers, contexts, or environments.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The system includes parts, measurements, behaviors, services, judgments, or outputs that naturally vary across time, people, instruments, suppliers, contexts, or environments.", "Use Tolerance Band Management when parts, processes, services, behaviors, evaluations, or measurements vary and the system must distinguish harmless variation from harmful deviation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Engineering Tolerances", "one_liner": "Acceptable variation.", "page_ref": "prime:engineering_tolerances", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Variation -> measured dimension.", "slug": "engineering_tolerances", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Engineering tolerances govern naturally varying parts or outputs."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The system includes parts, measurements, behaviors, services, judgments, or outputs that naturally vary across time, people, instruments, suppliers, contexts, or environments.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "They distinguish harmless deviation from function-breaking deviation.", "role_mapping": "Acceptable and harmful -> band.", "slug": "engineering_tolerances", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b069_a10_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Variation is unavoidable, and precision has a cost; function, compatibility, safety, fairness, and trust still require limits. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Some variation is harmless, useful, or economically necessary, while other variation breaks fit, function, interoperability, quality, safety, fairness, or user trust.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Some variation is harmless, useful, or economically necessary, while other variation breaks fit, function, interoperability, quality, safety, fairness, or user trust.", "Variation is unavoidable, and precision has a cost; function, compatibility, safety, fairness, and trust still require limits."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Engineering Tolerances", "one_liner": "Acceptable variation.", "page_ref": "prime:engineering_tolerances", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Acceptable and harmful -> band.", "slug": "engineering_tolerances", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "They distinguish harmless deviation from function-breaking deviation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Some variation is harmless, useful, or economically necessary, while other variation breaks fit, function, interoperability, quality, safety, fairness, or user trust.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A tolerance is a repeatable correction threshold.", "role_mapping": "Deviation -> acceptance rule.", "slug": "engineering_tolerances", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b069_a10_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Some deviation is inevitable and may be acceptable, but the system lacks a reliable way to decide which variation preserves function and which variation breaks it. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Stakeholders need a repeatable way to distinguish acceptable deviation from deviation that requires correction, escalation, waiver review, or redesign.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders need a repeatable way to distinguish acceptable deviation from deviation that requires correction, escalation, waiver review, or redesign.", "Some deviation is inevitable and may be acceptable, but the system lacks a reliable way to decide which variation preserves function and which variation breaks it."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Engineering Tolerances", "one_liner": "Acceptable variation.", "page_ref": "prime:engineering_tolerances", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Deviation -> acceptance rule.", "slug": "engineering_tolerances", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A tolerance is a repeatable correction threshold."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Stakeholders need a repeatable way to distinguish acceptable deviation from deviation that requires correction, escalation, waiver review, or redesign.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Tolerance exists because exact uniformity is impractical or unnecessary.", "role_mapping": "Exactness -> infeasible target.", "slug": "engineering_tolerances", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b069_a10_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when exact uniformity is not realistic: manufacturing has dimensional variation, service operations have timing variation, human judgment has contextual variation, and measurements have instrument or sampling variation. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Demanding exact uniformity would be too expensive, too slow, technically impossible, or would remove necessary local judgment.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Demanding exact uniformity would be too expensive, too slow, technically impossible, or would remove necessary local judgment.", "It is especially useful when exact uniformity is not realistic: manufacturing has dimensional variation, service operations have timing variation, human judgment has contextual variation, and measurements have instrument or sampling variation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Engineering Tolerances", "one_liner": "Acceptable variation.", "page_ref": "prime:engineering_tolerances", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Exactness -> infeasible target.", "slug": "engineering_tolerances", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Tolerance exists because exact uniformity is impractical or unnecessary."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Demanding exact uniformity would be too expensive, too slow, technically impossible, or would remove necessary local judgment.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Implicit limits produce drift and inconsistent acceptance.", "role_mapping": "Loose rule -> failures.", "slug": "engineering_tolerances", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b069_a10_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The archetype is also appropriate when informal acceptance rules are causing disputes. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Loose or implicit acceptance rules have begun to produce drift, disputes, inconsistent decisions, rework, defects, service failures, or compatibility problems.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Loose or implicit acceptance rules have begun to produce drift, disputes, inconsistent decisions, rework, defects, service failures, or compatibility problems.", "The archetype is also appropriate when informal acceptance rules are causing disputes."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Engineering Tolerances", "one_liner": "Acceptable variation.", "page_ref": "prime:engineering_tolerances", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Loose rule -> failures.", "slug": "engineering_tolerances", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Implicit limits produce drift and inconsistent acceptance."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Loose or implicit acceptance rules have begun to produce drift, disputes, inconsistent decisions, rework, defects, service failures, or compatibility problems.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Downstream fit requires bounded upstream variation.", "role_mapping": "Downstream system -> interface bound.", "slug": "engineering_tolerances", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b069_a10_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The deeper tension is that reality varies, but downstream systems still require dependable bounds. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A component, process, policy, or service must coordinate with downstream systems that need predictable bounds on variation.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A component, process, policy, or service must coordinate with downstream systems that need predictable bounds on variation.", "The deeper tension is that reality varies, but downstream systems still require dependable bounds."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Engineering Tolerances", "one_liner": "Acceptable variation.", "page_ref": "prime:engineering_tolerances", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Downstream system -> interface bound.", "slug": "engineering_tolerances", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Downstream fit requires bounded upstream variation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A component, process, policy, or service must coordinate with downstream systems that need predictable bounds on variation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 69, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-069", "ledger_sha256": "34e723e381305203d3bf1eb43c975aa66c3f16e08c0407db4bbb62b8c05834a6"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Tolerance Stack Management", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:tolerance_stack_management", "slug": "tolerance_stack_management"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is cumulative misfit. The system has many locally bounded deviations, but the global fit boundary is shared. Because the local bands were often designed independently, their combined effect can exceed what the assembled product, workflow, policy pathway, budget, service journey, or data pipeline can tolerate.\n\nThis pattern creates responsibility ambiguity. Every local contributor can say, “I was within tolerance,” while the integrated system fails. That is the signature that local control is not enough.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Multiple parts, process steps, handoffs, or decisions each allow bounded variation, but their deviations can accumulate, align, or interact so that the integrated system violates a higher-level fit requirement."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A tolerance stack comprises several local sources of permitted deviation.", "role_mapping": "Contributors -> local tolerances.", "slug": "engineering_tolerances", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b069_a11_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Because the local bands were often designed independently, their combined effect can exceed what the assembled product, workflow, policy pathway, budget, service journey, or data pipeline can tolerate. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: An assembly, workflow, data pipeline, service journey, or governance process contains several locally tolerated sources of deviation.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["An assembly, workflow, data pipeline, service journey, or governance process contains several locally tolerated sources of deviation.", "Because the local bands were often designed independently, their combined effect can exceed what the assembled product, workflow, policy pathway, budget, service journey, or data pipeline can tolerate."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Engineering Tolerances", "one_liner": "Acceptable variation.", "page_ref": "prime:engineering_tolerances", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Contributors -> local tolerances.", "slug": "engineering_tolerances", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A tolerance stack comprises several local sources of permitted deviation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "An assembly, workflow, data pipeline, service journey, or governance process contains several locally tolerated sources of deviation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Worst-case local deviations can combine beyond assembly tolerance.", "role_mapping": "Local pass -> component bound; integrated fail -> stack.", "slug": "engineering_tolerances", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b069_a11_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Every local contributor can say, “I was within tolerance,” while the integrated system fails. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Each contributor can pass its own check while the integrated outcome still fails fit, timing, compatibility, fairness, safety, or quality expectations.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Each contributor can pass its own check while the integrated outcome still fails fit, timing, compatibility, fairness, safety, or quality expectations.", "Every local contributor can say, “I was within tolerance,” while the integrated system fails."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Engineering Tolerances", "one_liner": "Acceptable variation.", "page_ref": "prime:engineering_tolerances", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Local pass -> component bound; integrated fail -> stack.", "slug": "engineering_tolerances", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Worst-case local deviations can combine beyond assembly tolerance."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Each contributor can pass its own check while the integrated outcome still fails fit, timing, compatibility, fairness, safety, or quality expectations.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Downstream mismatch despite upstream conformance exposes stack accumulation.", "role_mapping": "Rework -> accumulated deviation.", "slug": "engineering_tolerances", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b069_a11_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Downstream teams repeatedly discover mismatch, rework, or exception load even though upstream units claim to be within their specifications. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Downstream teams repeatedly discover mismatch, rework, or exception load even though upstream units claim to be within their specifications."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Engineering Tolerances", "one_liner": "Acceptable variation.", "page_ref": "prime:engineering_tolerances", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Rework -> accumulated deviation.", "slug": "engineering_tolerances", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Downstream mismatch despite upstream conformance exposes stack accumulation."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Downstream teams repeatedly discover mismatch, rework, or exception load even though upstream units claim to be within their specifications.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Rounding, substitution, and measurement errors compound across stages.", "role_mapping": "Small deviations -> tolerance sum.", "slug": "engineering_tolerances", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b069_a11_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when several local tolerances, timing allowances, discretion ranges, interface contracts, or quality limits contribute to one integrated outcome. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Small delays, rounding choices, substitutions, measurement errors, waivers, or local discretion decisions compound across a sequence.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Small delays, rounding choices, substitutions, measurement errors, waivers, or local discretion decisions compound across a sequence.", "Use this archetype when several local tolerances, timing allowances, discretion ranges, interface contracts, or quality limits contribute to one integrated outcome."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Engineering Tolerances", "one_liner": "Acceptable variation.", "page_ref": "prime:engineering_tolerances", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Small deviations -> tolerance sum.", "slug": "engineering_tolerances", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Rounding, substitution, and measurement errors compound across stages."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Small delays, rounding choices, substitutions, measurement errors, waivers, or local discretion decisions compound across a sequence.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The system is moving from prototype to production, local to regional scale, or manual to automated operation and hidden accumulation paths become visible.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The system is moving from prototype to production, local to regional scale, or manual to automated operation and hidden accumulation paths become visible. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The system is moving from prototype to production, local to regional scale, or manual to automated operation and hidden accumulation paths become visible."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The system is moving from prototype to production, local to regional scale, or manual to automated operation and hidden accumulation paths become visible."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 69, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-069", "ledger_sha256": "34e723e381305203d3bf1eb43c975aa66c3f16e08c0407db4bbb62b8c05834a6"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Tool-Repertoire Bias Counterbalancing", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:tool_repertoire_bias_counterbalancing", "slug": "tool_repertoire_bias_counterbalancing"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 5, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "An actor or organization is using an available tool, method, representation, interface, or specialty repertoire as an implicit ontology for the situation, causing misrecognition, overclassification into familiar categories, and interventions that fit the tool better than the underlying need.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "An actor or organization is using an available tool, method, representation, interface, or specialty repertoire as an implicit ontology for the situation, causing misrecognition, overclassification into familiar categories, and interventions that fit the tool better than the underlying need."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "No-free-lunch concerns performance across problem classes, not proposal order.", "slug": "no_free_lunch_theorem"}], "residual_id": "r:tool_repertoire_bias_counterbalancing:b069_a12_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b069_a12_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "An actor or organization is using an available tool, method, representation, interface, or specialty repertoire as an implicit ontology for the situation, causing misrecognition, overclassification into familiar categories, and interventions that fit the tool better than the underlying need. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A team proposes the familiar method before the problem has been independently described.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A team proposes the familiar method before the problem has been independently described.", "An actor or organization is using an available tool, method, representation, interface, or specialty repertoire as an implicit ontology for the situation, causing misrecognition, overclassification into familiar categories, and interventions that fit the tool better than the underlying need."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "No-free-lunch concerns performance across problem classes, not proposal order.", "slug": "no_free_lunch_theorem"}], "normalized_requirement": "A team proposes the familiar method before the problem has been independently described.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A team proposes the familiar method before the problem has been independently described.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P104-C07", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a focal case and a pre-existing repertoire into which it can be fitted.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A case and an already-available categorical or workflow repertoire are distinct roles.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve an initial mismatch rather than a case that already fits naturally.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The case is initially awkward for or resistant to the available repertoire.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail transformation of the case description toward repertoire fit, not neutral re-description.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The case is redescribed to conform to the available repertoire.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve fit as the terminating condition of the redescription process.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "Redescription continues until fit is achieved.", "type": "TIMING"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when redescription makes the case fit an available category.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The forced-fit destination is an available category.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when redescription makes the case fit an available workflow.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The forced-fit destination is an available workflow.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A case that does not readily fit the available repertoire is redescribed until it fits an available category or workflow.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "case is redescribed until it fits the available repertoire", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P104-C07-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Negative-case analysis can reveal rather than cause forced fit.", "slug": "negative_case_analysis"}], "residual_id": "r:tool_repertoire_bias_counterbalancing:b069_a12_c3", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b069_a12_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "An actor or organization is using an available tool, method, representation, interface, or specialty repertoire as an implicit ontology for the situation, causing misrecognition, overclassification into familiar categories, and interventions that fit the tool better than the underlying need. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Awkward cases are redescribed until they fit an available category or workflow.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Awkward cases are redescribed until they fit an available category or workflow.", "An actor or organization is using an available tool, method, representation, interface, or specialty repertoire as an implicit ontology for the situation, causing misrecognition, overclassification into familiar categories, and interventions that fit the tool better than the underlying need."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Negative-case analysis can reveal rather than cause forced fit.", "slug": "negative_case_analysis"}], "normalized_requirement": "Awkward cases are redescribed until they fit an available category or workflow.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Awkward cases are redescribed until they fit an available category or workflow.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P104-C08", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve stakeholders, their reported needs, and an official repertoire without requiring a particular reporting recipient.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "Stakeholders report needs, and an official tool-category or action repertoire exists.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail actual repertoire exclusion or mismatch rather than mere disagreement or preference.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The reported needs fall outside what the official repertoire can represent or address.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve institutionally sanctioned categories or actions.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The limiting repertoire is official rather than an incidental personal vocabulary or option set.", "type": "DOMAIN"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by exclusion from official tool categories.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The reported needs fall outside the official tool categories.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only by exclusion from the official action menu.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The reported needs fall outside the official action menu.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "Stakeholders report needs that the official tool categories or action menu cannot represent or address.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "stakeholder-reported needs fall outside the official repertoire", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P104-C08-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Stakeholder analysis can include every need.", "slug": "stakeholder_analysis"}], "residual_id": "r:tool_repertoire_bias_counterbalancing:b069_a12_c4", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b069_a12_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Tools make action possible by simplifying the world into grips, categories, and operations. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Stakeholders report needs that fall outside the official tool categories or action menu.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders report needs that fall outside the official tool categories or action menu.", "Tools make action possible by simplifying the world into grips, categories, and operations."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Stakeholder analysis can include every need.", "slug": "stakeholder_analysis"}], "normalized_requirement": "Stakeholders report needs that fall outside the official tool categories or action menu.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "Stakeholders report needs that fall outside the official tool categories or action menu.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P104-C09", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve an interface and a set of intervention or response options it mediates.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "An interface presents a repertoire of possible interventions or responses.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve selective exposure of a subset, not equal visibility for the whole repertoire.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "Some interventions are exposed as easy buttons.", "type": "QUANTIFIER"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail the contrastive co-occurrence of privileged visibility and hidden response capacity.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The same interface hides another response option while exposing the easy interventions.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when intervention alternatives are hidden.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The interface hides alternatives to the exposed interventions.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when referrals are hidden.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The interface hides referral options.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when nontechnical responses are hidden.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The interface hides nontechnical responses.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "An interface exposes some interventions as easy buttons while hiding another kind of response option.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "interface privileges easy interventions while hiding response alternatives", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P104-C09-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Balance does not entail interface-induced option hiding.", "slug": "balance"}], "residual_id": "r:tool_repertoire_bias_counterbalancing:b069_a12_c6", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b069_a12_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "An actor or organization is using an available tool, method, representation, interface, or specialty repertoire as an implicit ontology for the situation, causing misrecognition, overclassification into familiar categories, and interventions that fit the tool better than the underlying need. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The interface exposes some interventions as easy buttons while hiding alternatives, referrals, or nontechnical responses.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The interface exposes some interventions as easy buttons while hiding alternatives, referrals, or nontechnical responses.", "An actor or organization is using an available tool, method, representation, interface, or specialty repertoire as an implicit ontology for the situation, causing misrecognition, overclassification into familiar categories, and interventions that fit the tool better than the underlying need."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Balance does not entail interface-induced option hiding.", "slug": "balance"}], "normalized_requirement": "The interface exposes some interventions as easy buttons while hiding alternatives, referrals, or nontechnical responses.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "The interface exposes some interventions as easy buttons while hiding alternatives, referrals, or nontechnical responses.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Bias can distort output without a tool-repertoire mechanism.", "slug": "bias"}], "residual_id": "r:tool_repertoire_bias_counterbalancing:b069_a12_c7", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b069_a12_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Repeated failures show that the output was well-formed for the tool but weakly connected to the original problem. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Repeated failures show that the output was well-formed for the tool but weakly connected to the original problem."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Bias can distort output without a tool-repertoire mechanism.", "slug": "bias"}], "normalized_requirement": "Repeated failures show that the output was well-formed for the tool but weakly connected to the original problem.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Repeated failures show that the output was well-formed for the tool but weakly connected to the original problem.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A professional specialty, software system, dashboard, or standard operating procedure controls intake and classification.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: A professional specialty, software system, dashboard, or standard operating procedure controls intake and classification. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A professional specialty, software system, dashboard, or standard operating procedure controls intake and classification."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "A professional specialty, software system, dashboard, or standard operating procedure controls intake and classification."}, {"display_text": "The organization owns a costly tool or capability and feels pressure to use it even when fit is uncertain.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "An actor or organization is using an available tool, method, representation, interface, or specialty repertoire as an implicit ontology for the situation, causing misrecognition, overclassification into familiar categories, and interventions that fit the tool better than the underlying need. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The organization owns a costly tool or capability and feels pressure to use it even when fit is uncertain. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The organization owns a costly tool or capability and feels pressure to use it even when fit is uncertain.", "An actor or organization is using an available tool, method, representation, interface, or specialty repertoire as an implicit ontology for the situation, causing misrecognition, overclassification into familiar categories, and interventions that fit the tool better than the underlying need."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The organization owns a costly tool or capability and feels pressure to use it even when fit is uncertain."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 69, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-069", "ledger_sha256": "34e723e381305203d3bf1eb43c975aa66c3f16e08c0407db4bbb62b8c05834a6"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Top-Down / Bottom-Up Synthesis", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:top_down_bottom_up_synthesis", "slug": "top_down_bottom_up_synthesis"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 1, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is cross-level incompleteness. A top-down perspective sees scale, coherence, priorities, standards, and shared risk, but it abstracts away local detail. A bottom-up perspective sees lived constraints, tacit knowledge, specific failures, and practical opportunity, but it can be fragmented, parochial, and hard to prioritize across the whole system.\n\nFailure appears when one level dominates. Pure top-down action produces brittle plans that look good on paper and fail in practice. Pure bottom-up action produces many local optimizations that may not add up to a coherent system. The problem is not that one side is “wrong.” The problem is that each side is structurally partial.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Central direction lacks local validity, while local input lacks system-wide coordination, prioritization, or authority to change the larger plan."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "DSAPV2-P104-C10", "dnf": [["O1", "O2", "O3", "O4"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O5"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O6"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O7"], ["O1", "O2", "O3", "O8"]], "enumeration_semantics": "TRUE_DISJUNCTION", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": false, "obligations": [{"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve a central plan, a local signal source, and signals arising from that source without requiring the plan to represent a system.", "obligation_id": "O1", "statement": "A central plan, a local signal source, and signals produced by that source are distinct roles.", "type": "ROLE_TYPE"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must preserve the local provenance of the signals rather than generic unexplained observations.", "obligation_id": "O2", "statement": "The signals are produced from a local or frontline position.", "type": "RELATION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "The candidate must entail actual explanatory failure rather than partial explanation or a merely untested plan.", "obligation_id": "O3", "statement": "The central plan does not explain the locally produced signals.", "type": "POLARITY"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when local teams produce the unexplained signals.", "obligation_id": "O4", "statement": "The local signal source is a team.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when local sites produce the unexplained signals.", "obligation_id": "O5", "statement": "The local signal source is a site.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when local communities produce the unexplained signals.", "obligation_id": "O6", "statement": "The local signal source is a community.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when local users produce the unexplained signals.", "obligation_id": "O7", "statement": "The local signal source is a user.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}, {"candidate_satisfaction_rule": "This branch is satisfied only when frontline workers produce the unexplained signals.", "obligation_id": "O8", "statement": "The local signal source is a frontline worker.", "type": "DISJUNCTION"}], "predicate": "A listed local source produces signals that a central plan does not explain.", "resolution": "RETAINED_EXISTING_DSA", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "local signals remain unexplained by the central plan", "unit_id": "DSAPV2-P104-C10-U1"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_CHECKED", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Weak signals need not originate locally or contradict a plan.", "slug": "weak_signals_emerging_issues"}], "residual_id": "r:top_down_bottom_up_synthesis:b069_a13_c2", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b069_a13_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is appropriate only when local evidence can change the plan or when central intent can legitimately bound local variation. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Local teams, sites, communities, users, or frontline workers are producing signals that the central plan does not explain.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Local teams, sites, communities, users, or frontline workers are producing signals that the central plan does not explain.", "It is appropriate only when local evidence can change the plan or when central intent can legitimately bound local variation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "DSA_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "ADJUDICATED_B", "catalog_type": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "counterexample_attempt": "An automated execution layer would fail the guard; once the already-present execution source is restricted to a local frontline team, its improvisations still necessarily expose the planning-model omission.", "edge_tier": "GUARDED_CONTEXT", "name": "Plan-Execute Gap", "one_liner": "The pathology in which a coarse-grained planning artefact cannot be enacted because the execution layer faces binding fine-grained constraints the planning model never represented — so the fix is constraint propagation and feedback, never a better forecast.", "page_ref": "domain_specific:plan_execute_gap", "qualifier": {"fills_obligation_ids": ["O4"], "guard_type": "BRANCH_SELECTION", "kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "normalized_key": "plan_execution_source_frontline_team", "predicate": "The execution-layer signal source is a local frontline team.", "rationale": "The exact record and emitted expression satisfy one complete DNF branch under universal necessity, and the qualifier is atomic, candidate-anchored, and non-laundering."}, "relationship_clause": [{"kind": "DSA", "value": "plan_execute_gap"}, {"kind": "CONTEXT_GUARD", "value": "plan_execution_source_frontline_team"}], "role_mapping": "", "slug": "plan_execute_gap", "source_unit_id": "DSAPV2-P104-C10-U1", "why_it_fits": "Pass B correctly treats the actor subtype as a contingent branch-selection fact; Pass A's type bridge was not generally true of every execution layer."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Local teams, sites, communities, users, or frontline workers are producing signals that the central plan does not explain.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Local optimization can be formal and consistent.", "slug": "local_optimum"}], "residual_id": "r:top_down_bottom_up_synthesis:b069_a13_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b069_a13_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is also useful when local actors have already begun creating informal adaptations. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Local units are adapting informally, creating drift, workarounds, inconsistent quality, or hidden noncompliance.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Local units are adapting informally, creating drift, workarounds, inconsistent quality, or hidden noncompliance.", "It is also useful when local actors have already begun creating informal adaptations."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Local optimization can be formal and consistent.", "slug": "local_optimum"}], "normalized_requirement": "Local units are adapting informally, creating drift, workarounds, inconsistent quality, or hidden noncompliance.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Local units are adapting informally, creating drift, workarounds, inconsistent quality, or hidden noncompliance.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The Collingridge dilemma is late knowledge arriving after technology or policy becomes difficult to change.", "role_mapping": "Learning -> information; commitment -> control loss.", "slug": "collingridge_dilemma", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b069_a13_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful during strategy rollout, policy implementation, organizational change, platform governance, service redesign, and community-facing programs where central plans often fail because they do not match how work or life actually happens. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Implementation learning arrives too late, after the central commitment has become politically, financially, or technically hard to revise.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Implementation learning arrives too late, after the central commitment has become politically, financially, or technically hard to revise.", "It is especially useful during strategy rollout, policy implementation, organizational change, platform governance, service redesign, and community-facing programs where central plans often fail because they do not match how work or life actually happens."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Collingridge Dilemma", "one_liner": "Information about a system's consequences rises as the cost of changing it rises, so the window where intervention is both informed and feasible may be narrow or absent.", "page_ref": "prime:collingridge_dilemma", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Learning -> information; commitment -> control loss.", "slug": "collingridge_dilemma", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The Collingridge dilemma is late knowledge arriving after technology or policy becomes difficult to change."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Implementation learning arrives too late, after the central commitment has become politically, financially, or technically hard to revise.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Reductionism can be adequate and need not involve plural descriptions.", "slug": "reductionism"}], "residual_id": "r:top_down_bottom_up_synthesis:b069_a13_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b069_a13_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The structural problem is cross-level incompleteness. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Multiple levels describe the problem differently, and each description contains partial truth.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Multiple levels describe the problem differently, and each description contains partial truth.", "The structural problem is cross-level incompleteness."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "Reductionism can be adequate and need not involve plural descriptions.", "slug": "reductionism"}], "normalized_requirement": "Multiple levels describe the problem differently, and each description contains partial truth.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Multiple levels describe the problem differently, and each description contains partial truth.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A strategy, policy, standard, or program is being designed centrally but must work across varied local contexts.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful during strategy rollout, policy implementation, organizational change, platform governance, service redesign, and community-facing programs where central plans often fail because they do not match how work or life actually happens. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: A strategy, policy, standard, or program is being designed centrally but must work across varied local contexts. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A strategy, policy, standard, or program is being designed centrally but must work across varied local contexts.", "It is especially useful during strategy rollout, policy implementation, organizational change, platform governance, service redesign, and community-facing programs where central plans often fail because they do not match how work or life actually happens."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "A strategy, policy, standard, or program is being designed centrally but must work across varied local contexts."}, {"display_text": "Central leaders need coherence, comparability, risk control, or strategic prioritization, but purely local optimization would fragment the system.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A top-down perspective sees scale, coherence, priorities, standards, and shared risk, but it abstracts away local detail. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Central leaders need coherence, comparability, risk control, or strategic prioritization, but purely local optimization would fragment the system. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Central leaders need coherence, comparability, risk control, or strategic prioritization, but purely local optimization would fragment the system.", "A top-down perspective sees scale, coherence, priorities, standards, and shared risk, but it abstracts away local detail."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Central leaders need coherence, comparability, risk control, or strategic prioritization, but purely local optimization would fragment the system."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 69, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-069", "ledger_sha256": "34e723e381305203d3bf1eb43c975aa66c3f16e08c0407db4bbb62b8c05834a6"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Topic-Brokered Event Distribution", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:topic_brokered_event_distribution", "slug": "topic_brokered_event_distribution"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 6, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 6, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "6 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Many producers and consumers need to exchange event-like information, notifications, updates, telemetry, claims, or state-change signals, but direct producer-to-consumer wiring creates brittle coupling, recipient enumeration, duplicate integrations, inconsistent filtering, hidden fan-out, and unclear delivery obligations. Without a governed publish-subscribe structure, subscribers miss relevant changes, producers over-know their audience, brokers become opaque trusted intermediaries, and overload, replay, authorization, ordering, and subscription lifecycle failures become invisible until downstream behavior diverges.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Many producers and consumers need to exchange event-like information, notifications, updates, telemetry, claims, or state-change signals, but direct producer-to-consumer wiring creates brittle coupling, recipient enumeration, duplicate integrations, inconsistent filtering, hidden fan-out, and unclear delivery obligations. Without a governed publish-subscribe structure, subscribers miss relevant changes, producers over-know their audience, brokers become opaque trusted intermediaries, and overload, replay, authorization, ordering, and subscription lifecycle failures become invisible until downstream behavior diverges."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Publish-subscribe supports zero-to-many consumers per producer event.", "role_mapping": "Producer -> publisher; consumers -> subscribers.", "slug": "publish_subscribe", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b069_a14_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Direct addressing becomes brittle when the consumer set changes independently. In this condition set, the requirement is: One producer may have zero, one, or many legitimate consumers.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["One producer may have zero, one, or many legitimate consumers."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Publish Subscribe", "one_liner": "Producers emit to a topic and consumers subscribe to the topic, routed by an anonymous broker.", "page_ref": "prime:publish_subscribe", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Producer -> publisher; consumers -> subscribers.", "slug": "publish_subscribe", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Publish-subscribe supports zero-to-many consumers per producer event."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "One producer may have zero, one, or many legitimate consumers.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Subscribers select topics rather than receive direct commands.", "role_mapping": "Categories -> topics; consumers -> subscribers.", "slug": "publish_subscribe", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b069_a14_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The topic becomes the indirection surface between producer and subscriber. In this condition set, the requirement is: Consumers want categories of events rather than commands addressed specifically to them.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Consumers want categories of events rather than commands addressed specifically to them."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Publish Subscribe", "one_liner": "Producers emit to a topic and consumers subscribe to the topic, routed by an anonymous broker.", "page_ref": "prime:publish_subscribe", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Categories -> topics; consumers -> subscribers.", "slug": "publish_subscribe", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Subscribers select topics rather than receive direct commands."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Consumers want categories of events rather than commands addressed specifically to them.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Brokered topics decouple producer and consumer lifecycles.", "role_mapping": "Broker -> intermediary.", "slug": "publish_subscribe", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b069_a14_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Subscribers can join, leave, pause, replay, or change filters without requiring producer rewrites. In this condition set, the requirement is: Producer and consumer lifecycles evolve independently.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Producer and consumer lifecycles evolve independently."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Publish Subscribe", "one_liner": "Producers emit to a topic and consumers subscribe to the topic, routed by an anonymous broker.", "page_ref": "prime:publish_subscribe", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Broker -> intermediary.", "slug": "publish_subscribe", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Brokered topics decouple producer and consumer lifecycles."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Producer and consumer lifecycles evolve independently.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Fan-out filtering buffering retry replay and ordering are delivery semantics.", "role_mapping": "Event -> message; correctness -> broker behavior.", "slug": "publish_subscribe", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b069_a14_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The broker is not just a transport; it is a semantic boundary. In this condition set, the requirement is: Fan-out, filtering, buffering, retry, replay, or ordering semantics matter to correctness.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Fan-out, filtering, buffering, retry, replay, or ordering semantics matter to correctness."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Publish Subscribe", "one_liner": "Producers emit to a topic and consumers subscribe to the topic, routed by an anonymous broker.", "page_ref": "prime:publish_subscribe", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Event -> message; correctness -> broker behavior.", "slug": "publish_subscribe", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Fan-out filtering buffering retry replay and ordering are delivery semantics."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Fan-out, filtering, buffering, retry, replay, or ordering semantics matter to correctness.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "One stream can serve audiences with different subscriptions.", "role_mapping": "Audiences -> subscribers.", "slug": "publish_subscribe", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b069_a14_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Different subscriptions may require different filters, transforms, authorization scopes, freshness rules, or retention windows. In this condition set, the requirement is: The same event stream must serve multiple audiences with different needs.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The same event stream must serve multiple audiences with different needs."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Publish Subscribe", "one_liner": "Producers emit to a topic and consumers subscribe to the topic, routed by an anonymous broker.", "page_ref": "prime:publish_subscribe", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Audiences -> subscribers.", "slug": "publish_subscribe", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "One stream can serve audiences with different subscriptions."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The same event stream must serve multiple audiences with different needs.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Broker delivery records can establish who received which event.", "role_mapping": "Delivery -> subscription trace.", "slug": "publish_subscribe", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b069_a14_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Auditability matters when events trigger downstream action across boundaries. In this condition set, the requirement is: Visibility into who received what and why is needed after the fact.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Visibility into who received what and why is needed after the fact."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Publish Subscribe", "one_liner": "Producers emit to a topic and consumers subscribe to the topic, routed by an anonymous broker.", "page_ref": "prime:publish_subscribe", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Delivery -> subscription trace.", "slug": "publish_subscribe", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Broker delivery records can establish who received which event."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Visibility into who received what and why is needed after the fact.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 69, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-069", "ledger_sha256": "34e723e381305203d3bf1eb43c975aa66c3f16e08c0407db4bbb62b8c05834a6"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Topology-Preserving Transformation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:topology_preserving_transformation", "slug": "topology_preserving_transformation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is relation loss under form change. A system can be transformed in a way that looks cleaner, faster, or more modern while silently destroying the paths that carried work, meaning, accountability, service, or risk control.\n\nA migration can copy objects but lose references. A reorganization can produce a simpler chart while breaking collaboration paths. A refactor can preserve function locally while breaking downstream consumers. A workflow simplification can remove a step that looked redundant but actually preserved context or authority.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A transformation is underway or needed, but planners are focusing on visible form, ownership, categories, components, or efficiency while risking the loss of the connectivity relationships that make the system function."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Equivalence-preserving rewriting changes form while retaining declared semantics.", "role_mapping": "Old form -> source; new form -> rewrite.", "slug": "equivalence_preserving_rewriting", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b069_a15_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A system must be migrated, reorganized, refactored, simplified, scaled, compressed, or represented differently. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A system must be migrated, reorganized, refactored, simplified, scaled, compressed, or represented differently."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Equivalence-Preserving Rewriting", "one_liner": "Transforming an object into a behaviourally equivalent but operationally different form under an explicit equivalence relation, then selecting among rewrites by an orthogonal cost criterion.", "page_ref": "prime:equivalence_preserving_rewriting", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Old form -> source; new form -> rewrite.", "slug": "equivalence_preserving_rewriting", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Equivalence-preserving rewriting changes form while retaining declared semantics."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A system must be migrated, reorganized, refactored, simplified, scaled, compressed, or represented differently.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Preserved dependencies and paths define the relevant equivalence.", "role_mapping": "Relations -> invariant structure.", "slug": "equivalence_preserving_rewriting", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b069_a15_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The archetype is strongest when the relevant relationships can be named: adjacency, reachability, dependency, lineage, ownership, permission, handoff, interface, sequence, or continuity. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The things being moved or changed are meaningful because of their relations: dependencies, adjacency, lineage, permissions, communication paths, service routes, or handoff sequences.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The things being moved or changed are meaningful because of their relations: dependencies, adjacency, lineage, permissions, communication paths, service routes, or handoff sequences.", "The archetype is strongest when the relevant relationships can be named: adjacency, reachability, dependency, lineage, ownership, permission, handoff, interface, sequence, or continuity."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Equivalence-Preserving Rewriting", "one_liner": "Transforming an object into a behaviourally equivalent but operationally different form under an explicit equivalence relation, then selecting among rewrites by an orthogonal cost criterion.", "page_ref": "prime:equivalence_preserving_rewriting", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Relations -> invariant structure.", "slug": "equivalence_preserving_rewriting", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Preserved dependencies and paths define the relevant equivalence."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The things being moved or changed are meaningful because of their relations: dependencies, adjacency, lineage, permissions, communication paths, service routes, or handoff sequences.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "A rewrite must state which relations survive rather than optimize boxes alone.", "role_mapping": "Local change -> rewrite; relations -> obligations.", "slug": "equivalence_preserving_rewriting", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b069_a15_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use it when a migration, reorganization, refactor, simplification, redesign, or representation change might break important relationships. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A proposed change optimizes local boxes, labels, or components but does not state which relationships must survive.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A proposed change optimizes local boxes, labels, or components but does not state which relationships must survive.", "Use it when a migration, reorganization, refactor, simplification, redesign, or representation change might break important relationships."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Equivalence-Preserving Rewriting", "one_liner": "Transforming an object into a behaviourally equivalent but operationally different form under an explicit equivalence relation, then selecting among rewrites by an orthogonal cost criterion.", "page_ref": "prime:equivalence_preserving_rewriting", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Local change -> rewrite; relations -> obligations.", "slug": "equivalence_preserving_rewriting", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "A rewrite must state which relations survive rather than optimize boxes alone."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A proposed change optimizes local boxes, labels, or components but does not state which relationships must survive.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "Obsolete surface form can be replaced while valuable relational meaning is retained.", "role_mapping": "Old form -> syntax; relation structure -> semantics.", "slug": "equivalence_preserving_rewriting", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b069_a15_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The structural problem is relation loss under form change. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The old form is costly or obsolete, but some of its relation structure remains valuable and must be carried forward.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The old form is costly or obsolete, but some of its relation structure remains valuable and must be carried forward.", "The structural problem is relation loss under form change."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Equivalence-Preserving Rewriting", "one_liner": "Transforming an object into a behaviourally equivalent but operationally different form under an explicit equivalence relation, then selecting among rewrites by an orthogonal cost criterion.", "page_ref": "prime:equivalence_preserving_rewriting", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Old form -> syntax; relation structure -> semantics.", "slug": "equivalence_preserving_rewriting", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "Obsolete surface form can be replaced while valuable relational meaning is retained."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The old form is costly or obsolete, but some of its relation structure remains valuable and must be carried forward.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Stakeholders worry that a redesign will orphan users, records, teams, services, interfaces, or responsibilities.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Typical warning signs include orphaned records, broken handoffs, isolated teams, lost dependency context, incompatible interfaces, or a plan that reorganizes components without stating which paths must remain connected. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Stakeholders worry that a redesign will orphan users, records, teams, services, interfaces, or responsibilities. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders worry that a redesign will orphan users, records, teams, services, interfaces, or responsibilities.", "Typical warning signs include orphaned records, broken handoffs, isolated teams, lost dependency context, incompatible interfaces, or a plan that reorganizes components without stating which paths must remain connected."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Stakeholders worry that a redesign will orphan users, records, teams, services, interfaces, or responsibilities."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 69, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-069", "ledger_sha256": "34e723e381305203d3bf1eb43c975aa66c3f16e08c0407db4bbb62b8c05834a6"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Traceability Linking", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:traceability_linking", "slug": "traceability_linking"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 6, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 6, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "6 of 7 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 7}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a broken chain. A system contains claims, requirements, decisions, records, artifacts, actions, tests, outcomes, or materials, but their origins and consequences are not explicit enough to follow. The result is not only missing documentation; it is missing relational structure.\n\nWhen traceability is absent, changes become risky. A revised requirement may leave old tests behind. A dataset may feed a report after its source has changed. A policy decision may be implemented in one office but not another. A claim may be repeated long after the source has been invalidated. An evidence item may be handled by several actors without a reconstructable custody path.\n\nThe recurring tension is that complete traceability can become burdensome, but incomplete traceability can make a system ungovernable. The intervention must find the useful middle: enough links to answer important queries, not so many links that the link system becomes unmaintained noise.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system contains artifacts or decisions whose sources, justifications, dependencies, or downstream implementations are not linked."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles.", "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "traceability", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b070_a01_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: auditability_gap. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["auditability_gap"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Traceability", "one_liner": "The infrastructure of bidirectional links that lets any element be followed backward to its origin and forward to its uses, turning opaque processes into auditable, queryable histories.", "page_ref": "prime:traceability", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "traceability", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "auditability_gap", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles.", "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "traceability", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b070_a01_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Good triggers include auditability gaps, change-impact blindness, evidence-chain gaps, implementation drift, coverage uncertainty, and custody or lineage requirements. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: change_impact_blindness.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["change_impact_blindness", "Good triggers include auditability gaps, change-impact blindness, evidence-chain gaps, implementation drift, coverage uncertainty, and custody or lineage requirements."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Traceability", "one_liner": "The infrastructure of bidirectional links that lets any element be followed backward to its origin and forward to its uses, turning opaque processes into auditable, queryable histories.", "page_ref": "prime:traceability", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "traceability", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "change_impact_blindness", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles.", "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "traceability", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b070_a01_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Good triggers include auditability gaps, change-impact blindness, evidence-chain gaps, implementation drift, coverage uncertainty, and custody or lineage requirements. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: evidence_chain_gap.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["evidence_chain_gap", "Good triggers include auditability gaps, change-impact blindness, evidence-chain gaps, implementation drift, coverage uncertainty, and custody or lineage requirements."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Traceability", "one_liner": "The infrastructure of bidirectional links that lets any element be followed backward to its origin and forward to its uses, turning opaque processes into auditable, queryable histories.", "page_ref": "prime:traceability", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "traceability", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "evidence_chain_gap", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles.", "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "traceability", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b070_a01_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Good triggers include auditability gaps, change-impact blindness, evidence-chain gaps, implementation drift, coverage uncertainty, and custody or lineage requirements. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: implementation_drift.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["implementation_drift", "Good triggers include auditability gaps, change-impact blindness, evidence-chain gaps, implementation drift, coverage uncertainty, and custody or lineage requirements."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Traceability", "one_liner": "The infrastructure of bidirectional links that lets any element be followed backward to its origin and forward to its uses, turning opaque processes into auditable, queryable histories.", "page_ref": "prime:traceability", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "traceability", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "implementation_drift", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is similar but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "access_catchment"}], "residual_id": "r:traceability_linking:b070_a01_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b070_a01_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Good triggers include auditability gaps, change-impact blindness, evidence-chain gaps, implementation drift, coverage uncertainty, and custody or lineage requirements. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: coverage_uncertainty.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["coverage_uncertainty", "Good triggers include auditability gaps, change-impact blindness, evidence-chain gaps, implementation drift, coverage uncertainty, and custody or lineage requirements."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is similar but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "access_catchment"}], "normalized_requirement": "coverage_uncertainty", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "coverage_uncertainty", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles.", "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "traceability", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b070_a01_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: responsibility_disconnection. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["responsibility_disconnection"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Traceability", "one_liner": "The infrastructure of bidirectional links that lets any element be followed backward to its origin and forward to its uses, turning opaque processes into auditable, queryable histories.", "page_ref": "prime:traceability", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "traceability", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "responsibility_disconnection", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles.", "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "traceability", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b070_a01_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: lineage_break. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["lineage_break"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Traceability", "one_liner": "The infrastructure of bidirectional links that lets any element be followed backward to its origin and forward to its uses, turning opaque processes into auditable, queryable histories.", "page_ref": "prime:traceability", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "traceability", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "lineage_break", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 70, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-070", "ledger_sha256": "f4ef65bd8b76db14d5cac17667378d2cb18d78398cb6fbad5272715fdf8e94aa"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Traceable Measurement System Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:traceable_measurement_system_design", "slug": "traceable_measurement_system_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 2 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 2}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Targets do not announce their own numeric representation. “Temperature,” “wellbeing,” “response\ntime,” “pollution,” “quality,” and “performance” each hide choices about system boundary, attribute,\ntime interval, reference population, scale, instrument response, sample, transformation, and use.\nDifferent defensible choices can produce different values without either instrument being broken.\n\nAn indication becomes a measurement only through a model. A sensor voltage must be related to a\nquantity; an assay signal to concentration; a survey response to a construct; a trace timestamp to a\nlatency definition; a rating to a rubric and population. That relationship depends on calibration,\nselectivity, nuisance influences, sampling, reduction, and assumptions. If those links are implicit,\nthe apparent precision of the output conceals uncertainty and model dependence.\n\nMeasurement failure often occurs after the number is produced. Results travel to dashboards,\nthresholds, contracts, diagnoses, models, and policy decisions without unit, method, uncertainty, or\nscope. A change in software, reference material, rater, sampling window, environment, or population\nbreaks continuity while the same label remains. The archetype prevents that semantic and evidential\nseparation.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A decision requires quantitative or categorized evidence about a target attribute, but the attribute is underspecified, the instrument observes only a proxy, the unit or scale is unclear, sampling misses relevant variation, calibration and reference links are weak, data reduction hides transformations, uncertainty is omitted, or the reported value travels beyond the context in which it is valid. The organization mistakes an output for a measurement because the measurement chain and its limitations are invisible."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles.", "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "calibration", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b070_a02_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A decision requires quantitative or categorized evidence about a target attribute, but the attribute is underspecified, the instrument observes only a proxy, the unit or scale is unclear, sampling misses relevant variation, calibration and reference links are weak, data reduction hides transformations, uncertainty is omitted, or the reported value travels beyond the context in which it is valid. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Calibration, traceability, sampling, uncertainty, or reference-frame choices affect the decision.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Calibration, traceability, sampling, uncertainty, or reference-frame choices affect the decision.", "A decision requires quantitative or categorized evidence about a target attribute, but the attribute is underspecified, the instrument observes only a proxy, the unit or scale is unclear, sampling misses relevant variation, calibration and reference links are weak, data reduction hides transformations, uncertainty is omitted, or the reported value travels beyond the context in which it is valid."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Calibration", "one_liner": "Aligning a system's output to a trusted reference by measuring deviation, adjusting to reduce it, and monitoring for drift.", "page_ref": "prime:calibration", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "calibration", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Calibration, traceability, sampling, uncertainty, or reference-frame choices affect the decision.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is similar but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "traceability"}], "residual_id": "r:traceable_measurement_system_design:b070_a02_c7", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b070_a02_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "results cross observers, instruments, sites, modes, times, populations, or organizations, or when. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Results must remain interpretable after transfer across time, software, laboratories, organizations, or jurisdictions.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Results must remain interpretable after transfer across time, software, laboratories, organizations, or jurisdictions.", "results cross observers, instruments, sites, modes, times, populations, or organizations, or when"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is similar but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "traceability"}], "normalized_requirement": "Results must remain interpretable after transfer across time, software, laboratories, organizations, or jurisdictions.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Results must remain interpretable after transfer across time, software, laboratories, organizations, or jurisdictions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A property, construct, quantity, state, performance, exposure, or outcome must be represented by a value.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype whenever an attribute must be represented as a defensible value for comparison,. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: A property, construct, quantity, state, performance, exposure, or outcome must be represented by a value. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A property, construct, quantity, state, performance, exposure, or outcome must be represented by a value.", "Use this archetype whenever an attribute must be represented as a defensible value for comparison,"]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "A property, construct, quantity, state, performance, exposure, or outcome must be represented by a value."}, {"display_text": "More than one instrument, rater, site, mode, or procedure could produce materially different results.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Different defensible choices can produce different values without either instrument being broken. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: More than one instrument, rater, site, mode, or procedure could produce materially different results. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["More than one instrument, rater, site, mode, or procedure could produce materially different results.", "Different defensible choices can produce different values without either instrument being broken."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "More than one instrument, rater, site, mode, or procedure could produce materially different results."}, {"display_text": "The value will be compared with a threshold, baseline, standard, population, or prior measurement.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The measurement must simplify an attribute into a usable value while preserving enough meaning, uncertainty, context, and traceability that simplification does not become false precision or invalid comparison. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The value will be compared with a threshold, baseline, standard, population, or prior measurement. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The value will be compared with a threshold, baseline, standard, population, or prior measurement.", "The measurement must simplify an attribute into a usable value while preserving enough meaning, uncertainty, context, and traceability that simplification does not become false precision or invalid comparison."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "The value will be compared with a threshold, baseline, standard, population, or prior measurement."}, {"display_text": "A proxy is used because the target attribute is not directly observable.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A decision requires quantitative or categorized evidence about a target attribute, but the attribute is underspecified, the instrument observes only a proxy, the unit or scale is unclear, sampling misses relevant variation, calibration and reference links are weak, data reduction hides transformations, uncertainty is omitted, or the reported value travels beyond the context in which it is valid. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: A proxy is used because the target attribute is not directly observable. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A proxy is used because the target attribute is not directly observable.", "A decision requires quantitative or categorized evidence about a target attribute, but the attribute is underspecified, the instrument observes only a proxy, the unit or scale is unclear, sampling misses relevant variation, calibration and reference links are weak, data reduction hides transformations, uncertainty is omitted, or the reported value travels beyond the context in which it is valid."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "A proxy is used because the target attribute is not directly observable."}, {"display_text": "High-consequence action depends on whether a difference is real, large enough, and valid for the use.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: High-consequence action depends on whether a difference is real, large enough, and valid for the use. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["High-consequence action depends on whether a difference is real, large enough, and valid for the use."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "High-consequence action depends on whether a difference is real, large enough, and valid for the use."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 70, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-070", "ledger_sha256": "f4ef65bd8b76db14d5cac17667378d2cb18d78398cb6fbad5272715fdf8e94aa"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Tradeoff Guardrail", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:tradeoff_guardrail", "slug": "tradeoff_guardrail"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is silent erosion under optimization pressure. The decision-maker sees the gain clearly but the sacrifice is hidden, delayed, normalized, or politically easy to externalize.\n\nThe danger is not merely that a tradeoff exists. The danger is that the system lacks a boundary between ordinary compromise and unacceptable sacrifice. Without that boundary, the locally rational choice can repeatedly violate the global obligation.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Decision-makers optimize one dimension while silently eroding another value that is supposed to remain protected, such as safety, fairness, integrity, quality, resilience, or basic service adequacy."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is similar but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "escalation_dominance"}], "residual_id": "r:tradeoff_guardrail:b070_a03_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b070_a03_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The structural problem is silent erosion under optimization pressure. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Optimization pressure.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Optimization pressure", "The structural problem is silent erosion under optimization pressure."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is similar but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "escalation_dominance"}], "normalized_requirement": "Optimization pressure", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Optimization pressure", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is similar but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "moral_hazard"}], "residual_id": "r:tradeoff_guardrail:b070_a03_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b070_a03_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The decision-maker sees the gain clearly but the sacrifice is hidden, delayed, normalized, or politically easy to externalize. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Hidden sacrifice.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Hidden sacrifice", "The decision-maker sees the gain clearly but the sacrifice is hidden, delayed, normalized, or politically easy to externalize."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is similar but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "moral_hazard"}], "normalized_requirement": "Hidden sacrifice", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Hidden sacrifice", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is similar but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "optionality"}], "residual_id": "r:tradeoff_guardrail:b070_a03_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b070_a03_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Non-negotiable obligation. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Non-negotiable obligation"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is similar but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "optionality"}], "normalized_requirement": "Non-negotiable obligation", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Non-negotiable obligation", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is similar but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "blockage_release_dynamics"}], "residual_id": "r:tradeoff_guardrail:b070_a03_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b070_a03_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Repeated erosion. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Repeated erosion"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is similar but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "blockage_release_dynamics"}], "normalized_requirement": "Repeated erosion", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Repeated erosion", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Ambiguous exception handling.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Ambiguous exception handling. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Ambiguous exception handling"]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Ambiguous exception handling"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 70, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-070", "ledger_sha256": "f4ef65bd8b76db14d5cac17667378d2cb18d78398cb6fbad5272715fdf8e94aa"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Transaction Cost Reduction", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:transaction_cost_reduction", "slug": "transaction_cost_reduction"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a gap between latent mutual benefit and practical exchange. Parties may want compatible things, or each may hold something the other values, but the path from potential value to completed transaction is too expensive.\n\nThe cost may appear before contact, during evaluation, in negotiation, during coordination, at payment or settlement, or after failure. For example, a buyer may not know which supplier is credible; a patient may not know which specialist is available; a software partner may face weeks of bespoke integration work; a community volunteer may not know which request is verified; or an agency may avoid a useful vendor because contracting overhead is too high.\n\nThe deeper tension is that each participant evaluates the exchange after accounting for transaction cost. If the friction is high enough, beneficial exchange remains theoretical. The system may look like a demand problem, supply problem, trust problem, or coordination problem, but the common structure is that the transaction path itself consumes the value.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Parties could benefit from exchange or coordination, but the transaction path imposes enough search cost, negotiation cost, verification burden, coordination overhead, time delay, uncertainty, or enforcement risk that the exchange does not happen or happens only in a narrow, costly, low-trust form."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is similar but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "strategic_substitute"}], "residual_id": "r:transaction_cost_reduction:b070_a04_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b070_a04_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: There are plausible gains from trade, coordination, or resource sharing across actors. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["There are plausible gains from trade, coordination, or resource sharing across actors."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is similar but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "strategic_substitute"}], "normalized_requirement": "There are plausible gains from trade, coordination, or resource sharing across actors.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "There are plausible gains from trade, coordination, or resource sharing across actors.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is similar but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "opportunity_cost"}], "residual_id": "r:transaction_cost_reduction:b070_a04_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b070_a04_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The system may look like a demand problem, supply problem, trust problem, or coordination problem, but the common structure is that the transaction path itself consumes the value. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The binding obstacle is the cost of transacting rather than the absence of demand, supply, capability, or legal permission.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The binding obstacle is the cost of transacting rather than the absence of demand, supply, capability, or legal permission.", "The system may look like a demand problem, supply problem, trust problem, or coordination problem, but the common structure is that the transaction path itself consumes the value."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is similar but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "opportunity_cost"}], "normalized_requirement": "The binding obstacle is the cost of transacting rather than the absence of demand, supply, capability, or legal permission.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The binding obstacle is the cost of transacting rather than the absence of demand, supply, capability, or legal permission.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles.", "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "transaction_costs", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b070_a04_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The cost may appear before contact, during evaluation, in negotiation, during coordination, at payment or settlement, or after failure. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The friction can be localized to search, matching, comparison, negotiation, verification, coordination, contracting, payment, settlement, compliance, or enforcement.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The friction can be localized to search, matching, comparison, negotiation, verification, coordination, contracting, payment, settlement, compliance, or enforcement.", "The cost may appear before contact, during evaluation, in negotiation, during coordination, at payment or settlement, or after failure."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Transaction Costs", "one_liner": "Frictions in exchange.", "page_ref": "prime:transaction_costs", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "transaction_costs", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The friction can be localized to search, matching, comparison, negotiation, verification, coordination, contracting, payment, settlement, compliance, or enforcement.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is similar but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "bypassed_safeguard"}], "residual_id": "r:transaction_cost_reduction:b070_a04_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b070_a04_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Some friction protects consent, safety, privacy, quality, legal rights, due process, or accountability. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The intervention can lower friction without removing safeguards that protect quality, consent, fairness, safety, or accountability.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The intervention can lower friction without removing safeguards that protect quality, consent, fairness, safety, or accountability.", "Some friction protects consent, safety, privacy, quality, legal rights, due process, or accountability."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is similar but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "bypassed_safeguard"}], "normalized_requirement": "The intervention can lower friction without removing safeguards that protect quality, consent, fairness, safety, or accountability.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The intervention can lower friction without removing safeguards that protect quality, consent, fairness, safety, or accountability.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles.", "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "transaction_costs", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b070_a04_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when the same transaction pattern repeats across many parties or many instances. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The transaction pattern repeats enough, or has enough value, to justify investment in shared infrastructure or rules.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The transaction pattern repeats enough, or has enough value, to justify investment in shared infrastructure or rules.", "It is especially useful when the same transaction pattern repeats across many parties or many instances."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Transaction Costs", "one_liner": "Frictions in exchange.", "page_ref": "prime:transaction_costs", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "transaction_costs", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The transaction pattern repeats enough, or has enough value, to justify investment in shared infrastructure or rules.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles.", "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "transaction_costs", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b070_a04_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Parties could benefit from exchange or coordination, but the transaction path imposes enough search cost, negotiation cost, verification burden, coordination overhead, time delay, uncertainty, or enforcement risk that the exchange does not happen or happens only in a narrow, costly, low-trust form. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The exchange depends on enough shared vocabulary, interfaces, trust signals, or enforcement expectations to make parties comfortable acting.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The exchange depends on enough shared vocabulary, interfaces, trust signals, or enforcement expectations to make parties comfortable acting.", "Parties could benefit from exchange or coordination, but the transaction path imposes enough search cost, negotiation cost, verification burden, coordination overhead, time delay, uncertainty, or enforcement risk that the exchange does not happen or happens only in a narrow, costly, low-trust form."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Transaction Costs", "one_liner": "Frictions in exchange.", "page_ref": "prime:transaction_costs", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "transaction_costs", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The exchange depends on enough shared vocabulary, interfaces, trust signals, or enforcement expectations to make parties comfortable acting.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 70, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-070", "ledger_sha256": "f4ef65bd8b76db14d5cac17667378d2cb18d78398cb6fbad5272715fdf8e94aa"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Transactional Atomicity", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:transactional_atomicity", "slug": "transactional_atomicity"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a mismatch between execution and meaning. Execution often occurs step by step, but the meaning of the work belongs to the completed group. A bank transfer is not valid if only the payer was debited. A real-estate closing is not valid if only title moved or only money moved. A safety-critical discharge is not valid if status changes without the required support actions.\n\nPartial completion creates invalid states because the system exposes intermediate effects as if they were final. Once downstream actors see or rely on those effects, cleanup becomes harder. The pattern is therefore not just about failure handling; it is about preventing invalid intermediate states from becoming accepted reality.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A set of operations must be valid as a group, but the environment can allow individual operations to succeed, fail, be interrupted, or be observed independently. Partial completion can create invalid balances, broken obligations, unsafe readiness, duplicated authority, orphaned records, or unclear responsibility."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles.", "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "transaction", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b070_a05_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when an exchange, state change, approval, record update, or release depends on multiple operations and the system can be interrupted between them. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Multiple operations together express one logical action, exchange, approval, update, or transfer.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Multiple operations together express one logical action, exchange, approval, update, or transfer.", "It is especially useful when an exchange, state change, approval, record update, or release depends on multiple operations and the system can be interrupted between them."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Transaction", "one_liner": "All-or-nothing operations.", "page_ref": "prime:transaction", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "transaction", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Multiple operations together express one logical action, exchange, approval, update, or transfer.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles.", "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "transaction", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b070_a05_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when an exchange, state change, approval, record update, or release depends on multiple operations and the system can be interrupted between them. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A later operation depends on the successful completion of an earlier one, but failure can occur between them.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A later operation depends on the successful completion of an earlier one, but failure can occur between them.", "It is especially useful when an exchange, state change, approval, record update, or release depends on multiple operations and the system can be interrupted between them."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Transaction", "one_liner": "All-or-nothing operations.", "page_ref": "prime:transaction", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "transaction", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A later operation depends on the successful completion of an earlier one, but failure can occur between them.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is similar but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "adverse_selection"}], "residual_id": "r:transactional_atomicity:b070_a05_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b070_a05_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use Transactional Atomicity when partial success is more dangerous than complete failure. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Partial success creates worse outcomes than complete failure because it leaves the system in an inconsistent or contested state.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Partial success creates worse outcomes than complete failure because it leaves the system in an inconsistent or contested state.", "Use Transactional Atomicity when partial success is more dangerous than complete failure."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is similar but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "adverse_selection"}], "normalized_requirement": "Partial success creates worse outcomes than complete failure because it leaves the system in an inconsistent or contested state.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Partial success creates worse outcomes than complete failure because it leaves the system in an inconsistent or contested state.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is similar but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "past_state_contamination"}], "residual_id": "r:transactional_atomicity:b070_a05_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b070_a05_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Partial completion creates invalid states because the system exposes intermediate effects as if they were final. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Observers, downstream systems, or participants may act on an intermediate state before the whole bundle is complete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Observers, downstream systems, or participants may act on an intermediate state before the whole bundle is complete.", "Partial completion creates invalid states because the system exposes intermediate effects as if they were final."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is similar but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "past_state_contamination"}], "normalized_requirement": "Observers, downstream systems, or participants may act on an intermediate state before the whole bundle is complete.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Observers, downstream systems, or participants may act on an intermediate state before the whole bundle is complete.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles.", "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "transaction", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b070_a05_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: There is enough control over the process to define a boundary, commit rule, rollback behavior, or compensation path. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["There is enough control over the process to define a boundary, commit rule, rollback behavior, or compensation path."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Transaction", "one_liner": "All-or-nothing operations.", "page_ref": "prime:transaction", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "transaction", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "There is enough control over the process to define a boundary, commit rule, rollback behavior, or compensation path.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 70, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-070", "ledger_sha256": "f4ef65bd8b76db14d5cac17667378d2cb18d78398cb6fbad5272715fdf8e94aa"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Transfer Scaffolding", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:transfer_scaffolding", "slug": "transfer_scaffolding"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 5, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is not ignorance alone. It is a broken or missing relation between prior knowledge and new use. The source context taught something, but the target context does not automatically cue it, preserve it, or reward the same behavior.\n\nTwo opposite failures are common. In inert knowledge, people do not recognize that prior learning is relevant. In negative transfer, they carry over the wrong assumption, habit, metric, or procedure because the target resembles the source superficially. Transfer Scaffolding addresses both by separating shared structure from surface similarity and by making adaptation explicit.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Relevant knowledge exists in one context, but actors fail to use it well in another because the target does not look enough like the source, looks deceptively too much like the source, or requires adaptation that remains implicit. The result is inert knowledge, rote copying, overconfident analogy, negative transfer, or repeated relearning of what should have been reusable."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles.", "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "scaffolding", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b070_a06_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Learners can perform in training but not in real situations. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Learners can perform in training but not in real situations."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Scaffolding", "one_liner": "Temporary learning support.", "page_ref": "prime:scaffolding", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "scaffolding", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Learners can perform in training but not in real situations.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles.", "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "scaffolding", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b070_a06_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Typical signs include learners who can solve textbook cases but fail on novel problems, teams that copy best practices without understanding why they worked, experts whose old habits misfire in a new role, or organizations that expect documentation to make lessons portable by itself. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A team wants to reuse a practice, policy, pattern, or lesson from another setting.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A team wants to reuse a practice, policy, pattern, or lesson from another setting.", "Typical signs include learners who can solve textbook cases but fail on novel problems, teams that copy best practices without understanding why they worked, experts whose old habits misfire in a new role, or organizations that expect documentation to make lessons portable by itself."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Scaffolding", "one_liner": "Temporary learning support.", "page_ref": "prime:scaffolding", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "scaffolding", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A team wants to reuse a practice, policy, pattern, or lesson from another setting.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles.", "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "scaffolding", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b070_a06_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: An analogy seems promising but its limits are unclear. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["An analogy seems promising but its limits are unclear."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Scaffolding", "one_liner": "Temporary learning support.", "page_ref": "prime:scaffolding", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "scaffolding", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "An analogy seems promising but its limits are unclear.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles.", "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "scaffolding", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b070_a06_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Typical signs include learners who can solve textbook cases but fail on novel problems, teams that copy best practices without understanding why they worked, experts whose old habits misfire in a new role, or organizations that expect documentation to make lessons portable by itself. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: People overfit to examples or worked cases.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["People overfit to examples or worked cases.", "Typical signs include learners who can solve textbook cases but fail on novel problems, teams that copy best practices without understanding why they worked, experts whose old habits misfire in a new role, or organizations that expect documentation to make lessons portable by itself."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Scaffolding", "one_liner": "Temporary learning support.", "page_ref": "prime:scaffolding", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "scaffolding", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "People overfit to examples or worked cases.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is similar but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "transfer_of_learning"}], "residual_id": "r:transfer_scaffolding:b070_a06_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b070_a06_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Prior expertise becomes a liability in a new role or domain. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Prior expertise becomes a liability in a new role or domain."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is similar but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "transfer_of_learning"}], "normalized_requirement": "Prior expertise becomes a liability in a new role or domain.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Prior expertise becomes a liability in a new role or domain.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles.", "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "scaffolding", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b070_a06_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use Transfer Scaffolding when relevant knowledge exists but target-context use is unreliable. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Knowledge transfer is expected through documentation alone.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Knowledge transfer is expected through documentation alone.", "Use Transfer Scaffolding when relevant knowledge exists but target-context use is unreliable."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Scaffolding", "one_liner": "Temporary learning support.", "page_ref": "prime:scaffolding", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "scaffolding", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Knowledge transfer is expected through documentation alone.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 70, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-070", "ledger_sha256": "f4ef65bd8b76db14d5cac17667378d2cb18d78398cb6fbad5272715fdf8e94aa"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Transition Boundary Monitoring", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:transition_boundary_monitoring", "slug": "transition_boundary_monitoring"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is that actors often monitor present-state values while ignoring proximity to state change. A system can appear normal because its current outputs remain within familiar ranges, yet its condition variables may be moving toward a boundary where behavior changes abruptly.\n\nThis creates predictable surprise. After the transition, people can often see the warning signs in hindsight. Before the transition, the same signals were treated as noise, ordinary variance, or disconnected metrics. The missing structure is a way to translate observations into boundary proximity and then into staged action.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system is moving toward a boundary between operating states, but ordinary monitoring reports current values without showing that a small additional change could shift the system into another regime."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles.", "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "near_miss_normalization", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b070_a07_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system is moving toward a boundary between operating states, but ordinary monitoring reports current values without showing that a small additional change could shift the system into another regime. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The system has distinct operating states or regimes rather than one smooth behavior curve.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The system has distinct operating states or regimes rather than one smooth behavior curve.", "A system is moving toward a boundary between operating states, but ordinary monitoring reports current values without showing that a small additional change could shift the system into another regime."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Near-Miss Normalization", "one_liner": "A system reads the absence of harm in a narrowly-averted event as evidence of robustness rather than as a signal of lost margin, so it resets the margin to the smaller value and drifts its operating envelope toward the failure boundary while still counting itself safe.", "page_ref": "prime:near_miss_normalization", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "near_miss_normalization", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The system has distinct operating states or regimes rather than one smooth behavior curve.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles.", "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "near_miss_normalization", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b070_a07_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when crossing the boundary would be abrupt, nonlinear, costly, hard to reverse, or socially destabilizing. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A crossing can cause abrupt, nonlinear, costly, or hard-to-reverse change.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A crossing can cause abrupt, nonlinear, costly, or hard-to-reverse change.", "It is especially useful when crossing the boundary would be abrupt, nonlinear, costly, hard to reverse, or socially destabilizing."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Near-Miss Normalization", "one_liner": "A system reads the absence of harm in a narrowly-averted event as evidence of robustness rather than as a signal of lost margin, so it resets the margin to the smaller value and drifts its operating envelope toward the failure boundary while still counting itself safe.", "page_ref": "prime:near_miss_normalization", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "near_miss_normalization", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A crossing can cause abrupt, nonlinear, costly, or hard-to-reverse change.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles.", "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "near_miss_normalization", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b070_a07_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Good use cases have a meaningful transition boundary, observable precursor signals, and an intervention window. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: There are observable indicators that correlate with distance, direction, or velocity toward the boundary.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["There are observable indicators that correlate with distance, direction, or velocity toward the boundary.", "Good use cases have a meaningful transition boundary, observable precursor signals, and an intervention window."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Near-Miss Normalization", "one_liner": "A system reads the absence of harm in a narrowly-averted event as evidence of robustness rather than as a signal of lost margin, so it resets the margin to the smaller value and drifts its operating envelope toward the failure boundary while still counting itself safe.", "page_ref": "prime:near_miss_normalization", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "near_miss_normalization", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "There are observable indicators that correlate with distance, direction, or velocity toward the boundary.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is similar but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "transient_response"}], "residual_id": "r:transition_boundary_monitoring:b070_a07_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b070_a07_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The intervention window can be short, but it must be real enough that warning changes action: prepare capacity, escalate care, reduce pressure, verify risk, stabilize conditions, or manage a deliberate crossing. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: There is enough time or enough preparatory value to act before or during the crossing.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["There is enough time or enough preparatory value to act before or during the crossing.", "The intervention window can be short, but it must be real enough that warning changes action: prepare capacity, escalate care, reduce pressure, verify risk, stabilize conditions, or manage a deliberate crossing."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is similar but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "transient_response"}], "normalized_requirement": "There is enough time or enough preparatory value to act before or during the crossing.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "There is enough time or enough preparatory value to act before or during the crossing.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The organization or control system can define responsibilities for responding to warning levels.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The organization or control system can define responsibilities for responding to warning levels. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The organization or control system can define responsibilities for responding to warning levels."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "The organization or control system can define responsibilities for responding to warning levels."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 70, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-070", "ledger_sha256": "f4ef65bd8b76db14d5cac17667378d2cb18d78398cb6fbad5272715fdf8e94aa"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Transition Readiness Assessment", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:transition_readiness_assessment", "slug": "transition_readiness_assessment"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 5 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is premature transition under uncertain conditions. A system is considering movement into a new state, but the conditions required for the new state to hold are not guaranteed. The old state may be uncomfortable or costly, yet the new state may fail if capacity, support, dependency closure, stakeholder readiness, fallback, or evidence is missing.\n\nThe central tension is that both movement and delay have costs. Moving too early can damage the transition. Waiting indefinitely can preserve stagnation, waste effort, or miss opportunity. Transition Readiness Assessment converts this tension into an evidence-based sufficiency judgment.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system is considering a transition, but the conditions needed for stable crossing may not be present."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is similar but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "recovery"}], "residual_id": "r:transition_readiness_assessment:b070_a08_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b070_a08_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when a system is preparing for launch, migration, discharge, reentry, operating-mode change, public rollout, return-to-service, or another threshold crossing where conditions matter. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A transition, rollout, migration, discharge, return-to-service, reentry, or phase shift is being considered.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A transition, rollout, migration, discharge, return-to-service, reentry, or phase shift is being considered.", "Use this archetype when a system is preparing for launch, migration, discharge, reentry, operating-mode change, public rollout, return-to-service, or another threshold crossing where conditions matter."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is similar but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "recovery"}], "normalized_requirement": "A transition, rollout, migration, discharge, return-to-service, reentry, or phase shift is being considered.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A transition, rollout, migration, discharge, return-to-service, reentry, or phase shift is being considered.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is similar but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "tension_and_release"}], "residual_id": "r:transition_readiness_assessment:b070_a08_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b070_a08_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Premature crossing would create instability, harm, rework, relapse, overload, failure, or loss of trust. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Premature crossing would create instability, harm, rework, relapse, overload, failure, or loss of trust."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is similar but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "tension_and_release"}], "normalized_requirement": "Premature crossing would create instability, harm, rework, relapse, overload, failure, or loss of trust.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Premature crossing would create instability, harm, rework, relapse, overload, failure, or loss of trust.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles.", "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "readiness_window", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b070_a08_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The transition should have identifiable preconditions, meaningful consequences if crossed too soon, and some ability to delay, narrow, prepare, condition, or abort. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The transition has identifiable preconditions that can be assessed before crossing.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The transition has identifiable preconditions that can be assessed before crossing.", "The transition should have identifiable preconditions, meaningful consequences if crossed too soon, and some ability to delay, narrow, prepare, condition, or abort."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Readiness Window", "one_liner": "A receptive substrate enters a bounded opening-interior-closing interval during which a class of interventions can take hold.", "page_ref": "prime:readiness_window", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "readiness_window", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The transition has identifiable preconditions that can be assessed before crossing.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is similar but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "pilot_to_scale_transition"}], "residual_id": "r:transition_readiness_assessment:b070_a08_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b070_a08_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Some preconditions are uncertain, incomplete, unevenly distributed, or dependent on actors outside the focal team. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Some preconditions are uncertain, incomplete, unevenly distributed, or dependent on actors outside the focal team."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is similar but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "pilot_to_scale_transition"}], "normalized_requirement": "Some preconditions are uncertain, incomplete, unevenly distributed, or dependent on actors outside the focal team.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Some preconditions are uncertain, incomplete, unevenly distributed, or dependent on actors outside the focal team.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is similar but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "evidence_latency_window"}], "residual_id": "r:transition_readiness_assessment:b070_a08_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b070_a08_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The transition should have identifiable preconditions, meaningful consequences if crossed too soon, and some ability to delay, narrow, prepare, condition, or abort. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: There is still time to delay, narrow, stage, prepare, or abort the transition based on evidence.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["There is still time to delay, narrow, stage, prepare, or abort the transition based on evidence.", "The transition should have identifiable preconditions, meaningful consequences if crossed too soon, and some ability to delay, narrow, prepare, condition, or abort."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is similar but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "evidence_latency_window"}], "normalized_requirement": "There is still time to delay, narrow, stage, prepare, or abort the transition based on evidence.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "There is still time to delay, narrow, stage, prepare, or abort the transition based on evidence.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A legitimate decision authority can act on the assessment rather than treating readiness as only advisory commentary.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Transition Readiness Assessment converts this tension into an evidence-based sufficiency judgment. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: A legitimate decision authority can act on the assessment rather than treating readiness as only advisory commentary. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A legitimate decision authority can act on the assessment rather than treating readiness as only advisory commentary.", "Transition Readiness Assessment converts this tension into an evidence-based sufficiency judgment."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "A legitimate decision authority can act on the assessment rather than treating readiness as only advisory commentary."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 70, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-070", "ledger_sha256": "f4ef65bd8b76db14d5cac17667378d2cb18d78398cb6fbad5272715fdf8e94aa"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Transitive Trust Boundary Hardening", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:transitive_trust_boundary_hardening", "slug": "transitive_trust_boundary_hardening"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 5, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 6 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A consumer accepts a payload, update, message, credential, artifact, instruction, data set, or recommendation because it arrives through a trusted producer, broker, channel, signer, vendor, delegate, or repository. An attacker who compromises or spoofs any upstream trust point can then deliver harmful content past controls that were aimed at outsiders, because the consumer verifies the relationship or channel rather than the specific payload and its permitted scope.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A consumer accepts a payload, update, message, credential, artifact, instruction, data set, or recommendation because it arrives through a trusted producer, broker, channel, signer, vendor, delegate, or repository. An attacker who compromises or spoofs any upstream trust point can then deliver harmful content past controls that were aimed at outsiders, because the consumer verifies the relationship or channel rather than the specific payload and its permitted scope."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is similar but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "past_state_contamination"}], "residual_id": "r:transitive_trust_boundary_hardening:b070_a09_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b070_a09_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Vendor names, package repositories, trusted messengers, certificates, platform channels, and known brokers become admission shortcuts. In this condition set, the requirement is: Downstream systems or people accept artifacts because of who or where they came from.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Downstream systems or people accept artifacts because of who or where they came from."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is similar but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "past_state_contamination"}], "normalized_requirement": "Downstream systems or people accept artifacts because of who or where they came from.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Downstream systems or people accept artifacts because of who or where they came from.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is similar but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "vouched_anonymity"}], "residual_id": "r:transitive_trust_boundary_hardening:b070_a09_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b070_a09_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Every such capability is a potential insertion or substitution point. In this condition set, the requirement is: A trusted intermediary can originate, transform, cache, route, sign, wrap, or approve payloads.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A trusted intermediary can originate, transform, cache, route, sign, wrap, or approve payloads."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is similar but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "vouched_anonymity"}], "normalized_requirement": "A trusted intermediary can originate, transform, cache, route, sign, wrap, or approve payloads.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A trusted intermediary can originate, transform, cache, route, sign, wrap, or approve payloads.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is similar but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "sandboxing"}], "residual_id": "r:transitive_trust_boundary_hardening:b070_a09_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b070_a09_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The perimeter accepts the messenger and thereby accepts the message. In this condition set, the requirement is: Consumer-side controls check perimeter identity but not artifact integrity, custody, behavior, or scope.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Consumer-side controls check perimeter identity but not artifact integrity, custody, behavior, or scope."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is similar but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "sandboxing"}], "normalized_requirement": "Consumer-side controls check perimeter identity but not artifact integrity, custody, behavior, or scope.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Consumer-side controls check perimeter identity but not artifact integrity, custody, behavior, or scope.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is similar but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "learning_substrate_contamination"}], "residual_id": "r:transitive_trust_boundary_hardening:b070_a09_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b070_a09_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Automation converts one upstream compromise into large downstream propagation. In this condition set, the requirement is: Automatic update, ingestion, forwarding, execution, publication, or reliance occurs after upstream approval.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Automatic update, ingestion, forwarding, execution, publication, or reliance occurs after upstream approval."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is similar but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "learning_substrate_contamination"}], "normalized_requirement": "Automatic update, ingestion, forwarding, execution, publication, or reliance occurs after upstream approval.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Automatic update, ingestion, forwarding, execution, publication, or reliance occurs after upstream approval.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is similar but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "revocation_closure"}], "residual_id": "r:transitive_trust_boundary_hardening:b070_a09_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b070_a09_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Old trust decisions remain usable after upstream conditions change. In this condition set, the requirement is: Trust grants are long-lived, cached, broad, or difficult to revoke.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Trust grants are long-lived, cached, broad, or difficult to revoke."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is similar but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "revocation_closure"}], "normalized_requirement": "Trust grants are long-lived, cached, broad, or difficult to revoke.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Trust grants are long-lived, cached, broad, or difficult to revoke.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles.", "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "trusted_intermediary_compromise", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b070_a09_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A single compromised chain can forge the object and its apparent justification. In this condition set, the requirement is: The upstream path supplies both the payload and the evidence used to trust it.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The upstream path supplies both the payload and the evidence used to trust it."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Trusted Intermediary Compromise", "one_liner": "Trust transitivity is exploited to push a hostile payload past the consumer's perimeter.", "page_ref": "prime:trusted_intermediary_compromise", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "trusted_intermediary_compromise", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The upstream path supplies both the payload and the evidence used to trust it.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Substitutable names, versions, mirrors, repositories, routes, topics, or providers can stand in for the expected source.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A hostile near-equivalent can be accepted if equivalence is not tightly bound. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Substitutable names, versions, mirrors, repositories, routes, topics, or providers can stand in for the expected source. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Substitutable names, versions, mirrors, repositories, routes, topics, or providers can stand in for the expected source.", "A hostile near-equivalent can be accepted if equivalence is not tightly bound."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Substitutable names, versions, mirrors, repositories, routes, topics, or providers can stand in for the expected source."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 70, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-070", "ledger_sha256": "f4ef65bd8b76db14d5cac17667378d2cb18d78398cb6fbad5272715fdf8e94aa"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Transparency for Accountability", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:transparency_for_accountability", "slug": "transparency_for_accountability"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 7, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 7, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "7 of 8 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 8}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Power can remain opaque even when many documents are public. Without linked authority, reasons, evidence, timing, accessible formats, withholding boundaries, response duties, and correction history, disclosure can create noise or legitimacy theater rather than accountability.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Decisions and processes affect people while their authority, criteria, reasoning, evidence, stage, or correction path remains hidden, fragmented, late, technically inaccessible, or selectively disclosed. Reviewers cannot distinguish legitimate confidentiality from concealment, affected parties cannot challenge error, and leaders can perform openness without becoming answerable."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles.", "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "accountability", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b070_a10_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Decisions and processes affect people while their authority, criteria, reasoning, evidence, stage, or correction path remains hidden, fragmented, late, technically inaccessible, or selectively disclosed. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A decision, rule, allocation, model, or process materially affects others.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A decision, rule, allocation, model, or process materially affects others.", "Decisions and processes affect people while their authority, criteria, reasoning, evidence, stage, or correction path remains hidden, fragmented, late, technically inaccessible, or selectively disclosed."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Accountability", "one_liner": "Responsibility for actions.", "page_ref": "prime:accountability", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "accountability", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A decision, rule, allocation, model, or process materially affects others.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles.", "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "accountability", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b070_a10_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Authority or responsibility is distributed across roles, vendors, systems, or tiers. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Authority or responsibility is distributed across roles, vendors, systems, or tiers."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Accountability", "one_liner": "Responsibility for actions.", "page_ref": "prime:accountability", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "accountability", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Authority or responsibility is distributed across roles, vendors, systems, or tiers.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles.", "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "accountability", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b070_a10_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Decisions and processes affect people while their authority, criteria, reasoning, evidence, stage, or correction path remains hidden, fragmented, late, technically inaccessible, or selectively disclosed. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Review depends on reasons, evidence, criteria, provenance, or process history.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Review depends on reasons, evidence, criteria, provenance, or process history.", "Decisions and processes affect people while their authority, criteria, reasoning, evidence, stage, or correction path remains hidden, fragmented, late, technically inaccessible, or selectively disclosed."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Accountability", "one_liner": "Responsibility for actions.", "page_ref": "prime:accountability", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "accountability", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Review depends on reasons, evidence, criteria, provenance, or process history.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is similar but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "information_asymmetry"}], "residual_id": "r:transparency_for_accountability:b070_a10_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b070_a10_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Information asymmetry allows error, abuse, favoritism, or evasion to persist. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Information asymmetry allows error, abuse, favoritism, or evasion to persist."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is similar but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "information_asymmetry"}], "normalized_requirement": "Information asymmetry allows error, abuse, favoritism, or evasion to persist.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Information asymmetry allows error, abuse, favoritism, or evasion to persist.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles.", "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "accountability", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b070_a10_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Accountability requires enough visibility to review power, yet indiscriminate disclosure can harm privacy, security, candor, due process, and comprehension. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Legitimate privacy, security, or confidentiality limits prevent indiscriminate openness.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Legitimate privacy, security, or confidentiality limits prevent indiscriminate openness.", "Accountability requires enough visibility to review power, yet indiscriminate disclosure can harm privacy, security, candor, due process, and comprehension."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Accountability", "one_liner": "Responsibility for actions.", "page_ref": "prime:accountability", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "accountability", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Legitimate privacy, security, or confidentiality limits prevent indiscriminate openness.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles.", "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "accountability", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b070_a10_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use it when consequential decisions or processes are hidden, fragmented, late, unintelligible, or selectively disclosed and affected parties need a practical path to question, verify, correct, appeal, or obtain remedy. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Affected parties need a practical way to question, correct, appeal, or seek remedy.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Affected parties need a practical way to question, correct, appeal, or seek remedy.", "Use it when consequential decisions or processes are hidden, fragmented, late, unintelligible, or selectively disclosed and affected parties need a practical path to question, verify, correct, appeal, or obtain remedy."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Accountability", "one_liner": "Responsibility for actions.", "page_ref": "prime:accountability", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "accountability", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Affected parties need a practical way to question, correct, appeal, or seek remedy.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles.", "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "accountability", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b070_a10_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Accountability requires enough visibility to review power, yet indiscriminate disclosure can harm privacy, security, candor, due process, and comprehension. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Disclosures change over time and require versioning, timeliness, and correction.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Disclosures change over time and require versioning, timeliness, and correction.", "Accountability requires enough visibility to review power, yet indiscriminate disclosure can harm privacy, security, candor, due process, and comprehension."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Accountability", "one_liner": "Responsibility for actions.", "page_ref": "prime:accountability", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "accountability", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Disclosures change over time and require versioning, timeliness, and correction.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles.", "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "accountability", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b070_a10_c8", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Transparency claims risk becoming symbolic rather than useful. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Transparency claims risk becoming symbolic rather than useful."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Accountability", "one_liner": "Responsibility for actions.", "page_ref": "prime:accountability", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "accountability", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Transparency claims risk becoming symbolic rather than useful.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [8], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 70, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-070", "ledger_sha256": "f4ef65bd8b76db14d5cac17667378d2cb18d78398cb6fbad5272715fdf8e94aa"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Trend Detection and Removal", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:trend_detection_and_removal", "slug": "trend_detection_and_removal"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Time-varying evidence contains persistent directional movement that can be confused with the focal pattern, effect, anomaly, cycle, or stationary relation the observer wants to understand.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Time-varying evidence contains persistent directional movement that can be confused with the focal pattern, effect, anomaly, cycle, or stationary relation the observer wants to understand."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is similar but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "washout_failure"}], "residual_id": "r:trend_detection_and_removal:b070_a11_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b070_a11_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A measurement, metric, signal, or outcome is observed repeatedly over time. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A measurement, metric, signal, or outcome is observed repeatedly over time."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is similar but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "washout_failure"}], "normalized_requirement": "A measurement, metric, signal, or outcome is observed repeatedly over time.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A measurement, metric, signal, or outcome is observed repeatedly over time.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is similar but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "signal_decay_and_fadeout"}], "residual_id": "r:trend_detection_and_removal:b070_a11_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b070_a11_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The series shows sustained upward, downward, saturating, or drifting movement. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The series shows sustained upward, downward, saturating, or drifting movement."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is similar but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "signal_decay_and_fadeout"}], "normalized_requirement": "The series shows sustained upward, downward, saturating, or drifting movement.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The series shows sustained upward, downward, saturating, or drifting movement.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles.", "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "stationarity", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b070_a11_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Time-varying evidence contains persistent directional movement that can be confused with the focal pattern, effect, anomaly, cycle, or stationary relation the observer wants to understand. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The question concerns anomalies, cycles, residual variation, intervention effects, baseline shifts, or stationary relations rather than only the existence of a trend.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The question concerns anomalies, cycles, residual variation, intervention effects, baseline shifts, or stationary relations rather than only the existence of a trend.", "Time-varying evidence contains persistent directional movement that can be confused with the focal pattern, effect, anomaly, cycle, or stationary relation the observer wants to understand."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Stationarity", "one_liner": "Stable statistical properties.", "page_ref": "prime:stationarity", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "stationarity", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The question concerns anomalies, cycles, residual variation, intervention effects, baseline shifts, or stationary relations rather than only the existence of a trend.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles.", "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "stationarity", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b070_a11_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Comparisons across periods would be misleading unless long-run direction is separated from short-run variation. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Comparisons across periods would be misleading unless long-run direction is separated from short-run variation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Stationarity", "one_liner": "Stable statistical properties.", "page_ref": "prime:stationarity", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "stationarity", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Comparisons across periods would be misleading unless long-run direction is separated from short-run variation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is similar but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "prediction_error"}], "residual_id": "r:trend_detection_and_removal:b070_a11_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b070_a11_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A forecast, policy evaluation, control limit, or monitoring dashboard depends on whether residual behavior is stable. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A forecast, policy evaluation, control limit, or monitoring dashboard depends on whether residual behavior is stable."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is similar but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "prediction_error"}], "normalized_requirement": "A forecast, policy evaluation, control limit, or monitoring dashboard depends on whether residual behavior is stable.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A forecast, policy evaluation, control limit, or monitoring dashboard depends on whether residual behavior is stable.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles.", "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "stationarity", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b070_a11_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Seasonality, cycles, and trend may be entangled in the same observed series. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Seasonality, cycles, and trend may be entangled in the same observed series."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Stationarity", "one_liner": "Stable statistical properties.", "page_ref": "prime:stationarity", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "stationarity", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Seasonality, cycles, and trend may be entangled in the same observed series.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Different windows produce different conclusions about whether the pattern is improving, declining, or deviating.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Different windows produce different conclusions about whether the pattern is improving, declining, or deviating. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Different windows produce different conclusions about whether the pattern is improving, declining, or deviating."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Different windows produce different conclusions about whether the pattern is improving, declining, or deviating."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 70, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-070", "ledger_sha256": "f4ef65bd8b76db14d5cac17667378d2cb18d78398cb6fbad5272715fdf8e94aa"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Turbulent Order Harnessing", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:turbulent_order_harnessing", "slug": "turbulent_order_harnessing"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a mismatch between **needed variation** and **required coherence**. The system needs enough disorder to discover new forms, but it also needs enough order to protect continuity, trust, safety, and identity. Too little turbulence produces stagnation; too much produces breakdown.\n\nThis often appears in mature organizations, brittle technical systems, over-scripted learning environments, stale governance routines, and preparedness systems that have not been tested against realistic stress. The surface symptom may be “we need innovation,” but the deeper issue is that the system has no legitimate, bounded way to disturb itself and learn.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system needs adaptive renewal, but ordinary operations suppress variation, while unbounded disruption would damage continuity, safety, trust, or coherence."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles.", "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "metastability", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b070_a12_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The system is stable but stagnant. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The system is stable but stagnant."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Metastability", "one_liner": "A system persists in a locally stable configuration that is not the global optimum, held there by a barrier that routine disturbances cannot clear.", "page_ref": "prime:metastability", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "metastability", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The system is stable but stagnant.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles.", "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "metastability", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b070_a12_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Participants are trapped in a local optimum, stale consensus, or overfitted process. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Participants are trapped in a local optimum, stale consensus, or overfitted process."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Metastability", "one_liner": "A system persists in a locally stable configuration that is not the global optimum, held there by a barrier that routine disturbances cannot clear.", "page_ref": "prime:metastability", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "metastability", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Participants are trapped in a local optimum, stale consensus, or overfitted process.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is similar but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "decoupling_point"}], "residual_id": "r:turbulent_order_harnessing:b070_a12_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b070_a12_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It also applies when a future shock is likely but should be rehearsed rather than experienced live. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Future shocks are likely but cannot be safely experienced in real time.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Future shocks are likely but cannot be safely experienced in real time.", "It also applies when a future shock is likely but should be rehearsed rather than experienced live."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is similar but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "decoupling_point"}], "normalized_requirement": "Future shocks are likely but cannot be safely experienced in real time.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Future shocks are likely but cannot be safely experienced in real time.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is similar but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "stratification"}], "residual_id": "r:turbulent_order_harnessing:b070_a12_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b070_a12_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Different roles, teams, disciplines, or communities rarely mix. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Different roles, teams, disciplines, or communities rarely mix."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is similar but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "stratification"}], "normalized_requirement": "Different roles, teams, disciplines, or communities rarely mix.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Different roles, teams, disciplines, or communities rarely mix.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is similar but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "decoupling_point"}], "residual_id": "r:turbulent_order_harnessing:b070_a12_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b070_a12_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when a system needs new options but cannot safely expose the whole operation to open-ended experimentation. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The core system is too important to expose directly to uncontrolled experimentation.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The core system is too important to expose directly to uncontrolled experimentation.", "It is especially useful when a system needs new options but cannot safely expose the whole operation to open-ended experimentation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is similar but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "decoupling_point"}], "normalized_requirement": "The core system is too important to expose directly to uncontrolled experimentation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The core system is too important to expose directly to uncontrolled experimentation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Attempts at innovation either remain symbolic or disrupt too much.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Attempts at innovation either remain symbolic or disrupt too much. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Attempts at innovation either remain symbolic or disrupt too much."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "Attempts at innovation either remain symbolic or disrupt too much."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 70, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-070", "ledger_sha256": "f4ef65bd8b76db14d5cac17667378d2cb18d78398cb6fbad5272715fdf8e94aa"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Uncertainty Explicitness", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:uncertainty_explicitness", "slug": "uncertainty_explicitness"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 5, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is caveat loss. The original analysis may know that something is uncertain, approximate, assumption-bound, sample-limited, or model-dependent, but the decision surface often shows only the conclusion. The number looks exact. The plan sounds settled. The recommendation reads as final. The dashboard metric lacks sample context. The model output appears authoritative.\n\nOnce uncertainty is removed from the decision surface, people overcommit. They choose a precise deadline from a rough estimate, compare noisy metrics as if they were stable, generalize beyond valid evidence, or treat unresolved assumptions as facts. The problem is not only ignorance; it is misrepresented ignorance.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A claim, model, estimate, forecast, plan, or recommendation carries uncertainty, but the representation presented to users hides that uncertainty or strips it away. The resulting artifact looks more certain, precise, complete, or general than the evidence supports."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is similar but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "foreseeing_prediction"}], "residual_id": "r:uncertainty_explicitness:b070_a13_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b070_a13_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when a claim, estimate, forecast, model, plan, or recommendation may be mistaken for something more certain than it is. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A decision depends on estimates, forecasts, measurements, or model outputs.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A decision depends on estimates, forecasts, measurements, or model outputs.", "Use this archetype when a claim, estimate, forecast, model, plan, or recommendation may be mistaken for something more certain than it is."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is similar but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "foreseeing_prediction"}], "normalized_requirement": "A decision depends on estimates, forecasts, measurements, or model outputs.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A decision depends on estimates, forecasts, measurements, or model outputs.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles.", "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "uncertainty", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b070_a13_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when evidence is incomplete, assumptions are fragile, consequences are high, or information will travel through summaries and dashboards that can strip away caveats. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Evidence is incomplete, indirect, conflicting, stale, or uneven across cases.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Evidence is incomplete, indirect, conflicting, stale, or uneven across cases.", "It is especially useful when evidence is incomplete, assumptions are fragile, consequences are high, or information will travel through summaries and dashboards that can strip away caveats."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Uncertainty", "one_liner": "Incomplete knowledge.", "page_ref": "prime:uncertainty", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "uncertainty", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Evidence is incomplete, indirect, conflicting, stale, or uneven across cases.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles.", "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "uncertainty", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b070_a13_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A plan depends on assumptions that may fail. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A plan depends on assumptions that may fail."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Uncertainty", "one_liner": "Incomplete knowledge.", "page_ref": "prime:uncertainty", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "uncertainty", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A plan depends on assumptions that may fail.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles.", "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "uncertainty", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b070_a13_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Stakeholders may mistake absence of caveats for certainty. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders may mistake absence of caveats for certainty."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Uncertainty", "one_liner": "Incomplete knowledge.", "page_ref": "prime:uncertainty", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "uncertainty", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Stakeholders may mistake absence of caveats for certainty.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles.", "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "uncertainty", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b070_a13_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The cost of being wrong differs across actions. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The cost of being wrong differs across actions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Uncertainty", "one_liner": "Incomplete knowledge.", "page_ref": "prime:uncertainty", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "uncertainty", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The cost of being wrong differs across actions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles.", "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "uncertainty", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b070_a13_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: New evidence or condition changes are expected. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["New evidence or condition changes are expected."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Uncertainty", "one_liner": "Incomplete knowledge.", "page_ref": "prime:uncertainty", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "uncertainty", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "New evidence or condition changes are expected.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Precision is easier to produce than to justify.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Precision is easier to produce than to justify. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Precision is easier to produce than to justify."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Precision is easier to produce than to justify."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 70, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-070", "ledger_sha256": "f4ef65bd8b76db14d5cac17667378d2cb18d78398cb6fbad5272715fdf8e94aa"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Unity–Variety Balancing", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:unity_variety_balancing", "slug": "unity_variety_balancing"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a two-sided failure surface. On one side, over-standardization makes the system rigid. The system becomes easy to recognize but hard to adapt. It may exclude local realities, suppress learning, or force people into hidden exceptions. On the other side, over-variation makes the system fragmented. The system becomes locally expressive but hard to coordinate, compare, maintain, audit, or trust.\n\nThe deeper problem is usually that the system has not separated invariants from variables. Current practice treats all inherited features as core, or all local preferences as acceptable, or every deviation as an exception requiring political negotiation. Without a named core and named variation zones, every change becomes a fight over identity.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system is pulled toward two failure states. In one direction, excessive standardization makes it monotonous, brittle, unresponsive, or unable to fit local context. In the other direction, excessive variation makes it incoherent, hard to coordinate, hard to recognize, hard to maintain, or impossible to compare. The structural problem is not simply that there is variety; it is that the system lacks an explicit architecture for deciding what must remain common and what may vary."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is similar but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "abstract_work"}], "residual_id": "r:unity_variety_balancing:b070_a14_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b070_a14_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "If shared identity or compatibility does not matter, decentralization may be enough. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Both common identity and contextual adaptation matter.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Both common identity and contextual adaptation matter.", "If shared identity or compatibility does not matter, decentralization may be enough."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is similar but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "abstract_work"}], "normalized_requirement": "Both common identity and contextual adaptation matter.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Both common identity and contextual adaptation matter.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is similar but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "balance"}], "residual_id": "r:unity_variety_balancing:b070_a14_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b070_a14_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "In one direction, excessive standardization makes it monotonous, brittle, unresponsive, or unable to fit local context. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Local units, audiences, users, teams, or contexts have meaningfully different needs.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Local units, audiences, users, teams, or contexts have meaningfully different needs.", "In one direction, excessive standardization makes it monotonous, brittle, unresponsive, or unable to fit local context."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is similar but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "balance"}], "normalized_requirement": "Local units, audiences, users, teams, or contexts have meaningfully different needs.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Local units, audiences, users, teams, or contexts have meaningfully different needs.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles.", "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "unity_variety", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b070_a14_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "If shared identity or compatibility does not matter, decentralization may be enough. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Coordination, recognition, comparability, or compatibility still depends on shared structure.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Coordination, recognition, comparability, or compatibility still depends on shared structure.", "If shared identity or compatibility does not matter, decentralization may be enough."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Unity & Variety", "one_liner": "Balance between consistency and diversity.", "page_ref": "prime:unity_variety", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "unity_variety", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Coordination, recognition, comparability, or compatibility still depends on shared structure.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles.", "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "unity_variety", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b070_a14_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Unclear boundaries between fixed and variable elements are producing drift or conflict. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Unclear boundaries between fixed and variable elements are producing drift or conflict."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Unity & Variety", "one_liner": "Balance between consistency and diversity.", "page_ref": "prime:unity_variety", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "unity_variety", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Unclear boundaries between fixed and variable elements are producing drift or conflict.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is similar but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "additive_bias"}], "residual_id": "r:unity_variety_balancing:b070_a14_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b070_a14_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The system must evolve over time without losing continuity. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The system must evolve over time without losing continuity."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is similar but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "additive_bias"}], "normalized_requirement": "The system must evolve over time without losing continuity.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The system must evolve over time without losing continuity.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The cost of either over-control or under-control is visible.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The cost of either over-control or under-control is visible. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The cost of either over-control or under-control is visible."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The cost of either over-control or under-control is visible."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 70, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-070", "ledger_sha256": "f4ef65bd8b76db14d5cac17667378d2cb18d78398cb6fbad5272715fdf8e94aa"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Universality Extraction", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:universality_extraction", "slug": "universality_extraction"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Cross-case learning fails in two opposite ways. Fragmentation treats every local configuration as unprecedented. Lessons remain locked inside domain language, experts, organizations, or case histories. Teams repeat analysis and recreate interventions because nobody has shown which relation can survive a change of context.\n\nPremature unification creates the opposite failure. A vivid analogy, a shared artifact, or a repeated outcome is promoted into a general principle. Cases are mapped into the preferred story, details that resist the story become exceptions, and the pattern grows harder to refute as its language becomes broader. Downstream users copy mechanisms or slogans without recreating the relation that produced the original effect.\n\nBoth failures arise because commonality has not been separated from invariance. A property can recur because the cases share a hidden source, because the sample was selected after the pattern was noticed, because the same policy or technology diffused across sites, or because observers encoded each case with the same conceptual vocabulary. Recurrence alone is therefore weak evidence. The problem demands variation that threatens the explanation.\n\nAnother difficulty is that cases rarely arrive in comparable form. One domain describes roles, another variables, another events, and another institutional rules. A naive feature table equates local nouns; a purely qualitative analogy can make every correspondence negotiable. Without a reversible relational comparison frame, analysts cannot tell whether apparent disagreement reflects different language, different granularity, a genuine causal difference, or a morally important distinction that should not be normalized away.\n\nFinally, a useful pattern needs a boundary. Many generalizations work in an interior region and fail under changed scale, coupling, population, authority, or environment. If failed cases are stored as miscellaneous exceptions, the catalog becomes less informative as evidence grows. A universality class must use boundary errors to discover regimes, refine membership, and constrain action.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Actors encounter many superficially different cases and either treat each as unique, losing transferable learning, or collapse them under a broad analogy, losing the differences that determine cause and action. Existing abstractions are case-bound, thematic, or selected for elegance rather than tested against variation. A reusable macro-pattern is suspected, but no disciplined procedure has shown which structure survives local change, which cases belong to the same class, or where transfer stops."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is similar but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "linguistic_universals"}], "residual_id": "r:universality_extraction:b070_a15_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b070_a15_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is also useful when an existing field vocabulary may be too local. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Similar outcomes recur under different local objects, vocabularies, and implementations.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Similar outcomes recur under different local objects, vocabularies, and implementations.", "It is also useful when an existing field vocabulary may be too local."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is similar but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "linguistic_universals"}], "normalized_requirement": "Similar outcomes recur under different local objects, vocabularies, and implementations.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Similar outcomes recur under different local objects, vocabularies, and implementations.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles.", "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "universality", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b070_a15_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The archetype is especially valuable after several domains have independently rediscovered a similar explanation or intervention, when a pattern is already circulating but its signature is vague, or when practitioners want to transfer a success without copying its visible artifacts. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A pattern library contains examples but the pattern signature was inherited rather than induced.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A pattern library contains examples but the pattern signature was inherited rather than induced.", "The archetype is especially valuable after several domains have independently rediscovered a similar explanation or intervention, when a pattern is already circulating but its signature is vague, or when practitioners want to transfer a success without copying its visible artifacts."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Universality", "one_liner": "Systems with different microscopic detail obey identical macroscopic laws because only a low-dimensional signature survives coarse-graining.", "page_ref": "prime:universality", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "universality", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A pattern library contains examples but the pattern signature was inherited rather than induced.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is similar but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "universality_in_critical_phenomena"}], "residual_id": "r:universality_extraction:b070_a15_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b070_a15_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Experts disagree whether two cases are structurally identical or merely metaphorically similar. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Experts disagree whether two cases are structurally identical or merely metaphorically similar."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is similar but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "universality_in_critical_phenomena"}], "normalized_requirement": "Experts disagree whether two cases are structurally identical or merely metaphorically similar.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Experts disagree whether two cases are structurally identical or merely metaphorically similar.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is similar but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "transfer_of_learning"}], "residual_id": "r:universality_extraction:b070_a15_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b070_a15_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The archetype is especially valuable after several domains have independently rediscovered a similar explanation or intervention, when a pattern is already circulating but its signature is vague, or when practitioners want to transfer a success without copying its visible artifacts. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A successful intervention is being copied across domains.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A successful intervention is being copied across domains.", "The archetype is especially valuable after several domains have independently rediscovered a similar explanation or intervention, when a pattern is already circulating but its signature is vague, or when practitioners want to transfer a success without copying its visible artifacts."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is similar but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "transfer_of_learning"}], "normalized_requirement": "A successful intervention is being copied across domains.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A successful intervention is being copied across domains.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles.", "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "universality", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b070_a15_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A model appears robust within one implementation but its microscopic assumptions are disputed. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A model appears robust within one implementation but its microscopic assumptions are disputed."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Universality", "one_liner": "Systems with different microscopic detail obey identical macroscopic laws because only a low-dimensional signature survives coarse-graining.", "page_ref": "prime:universality", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles map directly to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "universality", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails this predicate under the source roles."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A model appears robust within one implementation but its microscopic assumptions are disputed.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A general principle is valuable enough that its limits matter.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A vivid analogy, a shared artifact, or a repeated outcome is promoted into a general principle. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: A general principle is valuable enough that its limits matter. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A general principle is valuable enough that its limits matter.", "A vivid analogy, a shared artifact, or a repeated outcome is promoted into a general principle."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "A general principle is valuable enough that its limits matter."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 70, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-070", "ledger_sha256": "f4ef65bd8b76db14d5cac17667378d2cb18d78398cb6fbad5272715fdf8e94aa"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Use-Time Precondition Binding", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:use_time_precondition_binding", "slug": "use_time_precondition_binding"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system verifies a precondition at one time and later treats that verification as permission to act, but the relevant identity, state, authority, resource, custody, consent, balance, hazard, or evidence condition can change before the action occurs. The defect is not simply an absent check and not simply a bad action; it is a broken temporal binding between the check and the use.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system verifies a precondition at one time and later treats that verification as permission to act, but the relevant identity, state, authority, resource, custody, consent, balance, hazard, or evidence condition can change before the action occurs. The defect is not simply an absent check and not simply a bad action; it is a broken temporal binding between the check and the use."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime necessarily entails this condition.", "role_mapping": "The condition's entities occupy the prime's required roles.", "slug": "implementation_intention", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b071_a01_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system verifies a precondition at one time and later treats that verification as permission to act, but the relevant identity, state, authority, resource, custody, consent, balance, hazard, or evidence condition can change before the action occurs. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A later action depends on an earlier precondition check, status lookup, eligibility decision, resource availability result, credential validation, or safety assessment.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A later action depends on an earlier precondition check, status lookup, eligibility decision, resource availability result, credential validation, or safety assessment.", "A system verifies a precondition at one time and later treats that verification as permission to act, but the relevant identity, state, authority, resource, custody, consent, balance, hazard, or evidence condition can change before the action occurs."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Implementation Intention", "one_liner": "Pre-binding a specific future cue to a specific action so that at execution time the cue triggers the behavior without re-deliberation.", "page_ref": "prime:implementation_intention", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "The condition's entities occupy the prime's required roles.", "slug": "implementation_intention", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime necessarily entails this condition."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A later action depends on an earlier precondition check, status lookup, eligibility decision, resource availability result, credential validation, or safety assessment.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate does not entail the complete condition in every instance.", "slug": "time_of_check_to_time_of_use_flaw"}], "residual_id": "r:use_time_precondition_binding:b071_a01_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b071_a01_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Designers want to reduce friction by checking once and acting later, but the authority conferred by the check decays as the checked world changes. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The checked state can change, expire, be revoked, be substituted, be consumed by another actor, drift out of sync, or become ambiguous before use.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The checked state can change, expire, be revoked, be substituted, be consumed by another actor, drift out of sync, or become ambiguous before use.", "Designers want to reduce friction by checking once and acting later, but the authority conferred by the check decays as the checked world changes."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate does not entail the complete condition in every instance.", "slug": "time_of_check_to_time_of_use_flaw"}], "normalized_requirement": "The checked state can change, expire, be revoked, be substituted, be consumed by another actor, drift out of sync, or become ambiguous before use.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The checked state can change, expire, be revoked, be substituted, be consumed by another actor, drift out of sync, or become ambiguous before use.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime necessarily entails this condition.", "role_mapping": "The condition's entities occupy the prime's required roles.", "slug": "implementation_intention", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b071_a01_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Designers want to reduce friction by checking once and acting later, but the authority conferred by the check decays as the checked world changes. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: There is a nonzero delay, queue, workflow, actor handoff, network latency, physical transfer, human confirmation step, or asynchronous callback between checking and acting.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["There is a nonzero delay, queue, workflow, actor handoff, network latency, physical transfer, human confirmation step, or asynchronous callback between checking and acting.", "Designers want to reduce friction by checking once and acting later, but the authority conferred by the check decays as the checked world changes."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Implementation Intention", "one_liner": "Pre-binding a specific future cue to a specific action so that at execution time the cue triggers the behavior without re-deliberation.", "page_ref": "prime:implementation_intention", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "The condition's entities occupy the prime's required roles.", "slug": "implementation_intention", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime necessarily entails this condition."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "There is a nonzero delay, queue, workflow, actor handoff, network latency, physical transfer, human confirmation step, or asynchronous callback between checking and acting.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate does not entail the complete condition in every instance.", "slug": "credible_commitment"}], "residual_id": "r:use_time_precondition_binding:b071_a01_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b071_a01_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system verifies a precondition at one time and later treats that verification as permission to act, but the relevant identity, state, authority, resource, custody, consent, balance, hazard, or evidence condition can change before the action occurs. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: False acceptance after a state change can cause security, safety, financial, evidential, fairness, or integrity harm.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["False acceptance after a state change can cause security, safety, financial, evidential, fairness, or integrity harm.", "A system verifies a precondition at one time and later treats that verification as permission to act, but the relevant identity, state, authority, resource, custody, consent, balance, hazard, or evidence condition can change before the action occurs."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate does not entail the complete condition in every instance.", "slug": "credible_commitment"}], "normalized_requirement": "False acceptance after a state change can cause security, safety, financial, evidential, fairness, or integrity harm.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "False acceptance after a state change can cause security, safety, financial, evidential, fairness, or integrity harm.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime necessarily entails this condition.", "role_mapping": "The condition's entities occupy the prime's required roles.", "slug": "implementation_intention", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b071_a01_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The system has enough observability or control to use a version marker, lease, lock, reservation, timestamp, final recheck, or abort rule. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The system has enough observability or control to use a version marker, lease, lock, reservation, timestamp, final recheck, or abort rule."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Implementation Intention", "one_liner": "Pre-binding a specific future cue to a specific action so that at execution time the cue triggers the behavior without re-deliberation.", "page_ref": "prime:implementation_intention", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "The condition's entities occupy the prime's required roles.", "slug": "implementation_intention", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime necessarily entails this condition."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The system has enough observability or control to use a version marker, lease, lock, reservation, timestamp, final recheck, or abort rule.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The action cannot safely rely on a stale snapshot unless it explicitly commits to acting on that snapshot and its scope.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Strong binding reduces stale-action risk but can increase locking, latency, contention, disclosure, user friction, and failure-to-proceed rates. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The action cannot safely rely on a stale snapshot unless it explicitly commits to acting on that snapshot and its scope. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The action cannot safely rely on a stale snapshot unless it explicitly commits to acting on that snapshot and its scope.", "Strong binding reduces stale-action risk but can increase locking, latency, contention, disclosure, user friction, and failure-to-proceed rates."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The action cannot safely rely on a stale snapshot unless it explicitly commits to acting on that snapshot and its scope."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 71, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-071", "ledger_sha256": "a4461d6ced15792a6105829117926004dee9480de6f2507ef03d1ef5735f1fc2"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Use-Time Referent Validation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:use_time_referent_validation", "slug": "use_time_referent_validation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system or workflow treats a reference, resource, record, identity, condition, or dependency as still present and valid because it was expected, selected, checked, or true earlier. At the moment of use, the referent may be missing, revoked, replaced, expired, moved, consumed, concurrently modified, no longer authorized, or semantically ambiguous. Without use-time validation, the action executes against the wrong thing, no thing, an unsafe state, or an authority condition that no longer holds.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system or workflow treats a reference, resource, record, identity, condition, or dependency as still present and valid because it was expected, selected, checked, or true earlier. At the moment of use, the referent may be missing, revoked, replaced, expired, moved, consumed, concurrently modified, no longer authorized, or semantically ambiguous. Without use-time validation, the action executes against the wrong thing, no thing, an unsafe state, or an authority condition that no longer holds."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate does not entail the complete condition in every instance.", "slug": "unverified_precondition"}], "residual_id": "r:use_time_referent_validation:b071_a02_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b071_a02_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system or workflow treats a reference, resource, record, identity, condition, or dependency as still present and valid because it was expected, selected, checked, or true earlier. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: An action depends on a resource, object, record, permission, identity, inventory item, state, or external service being present or valid.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["An action depends on a resource, object, record, permission, identity, inventory item, state, or external service being present or valid.", "A system or workflow treats a reference, resource, record, identity, condition, or dependency as still present and valid because it was expected, selected, checked, or true earlier."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate does not entail the complete condition in every instance.", "slug": "unverified_precondition"}], "normalized_requirement": "An action depends on a resource, object, record, permission, identity, inventory item, state, or external service being present or valid.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "An action depends on a resource, object, record, permission, identity, inventory item, state, or external service being present or valid.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime necessarily entails this condition.", "role_mapping": "The condition's entities occupy the prime's required roles.", "slug": "time_of_check_to_time_of_use_flaw", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b071_a02_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The tension is between low-friction action on assumptions and safe action on currently verified, action-bound referents. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The referent was identified, cached, checked, reserved, promised, or inferred before the action actually uses it.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The referent was identified, cached, checked, reserved, promised, or inferred before the action actually uses it.", "The tension is between low-friction action on assumptions and safe action on currently verified, action-bound referents."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Time-Of-Check To Time-Of-Use Flaw", "one_liner": "A precondition verified at one instant authorizes an action taken at a later instant, and the relevant state changes in the gap between them, so the defect lives in the temporal binding between check and use rather than in either operation.", "page_ref": "prime:time_of_check_to_time_of_use_flaw", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "The condition's entities occupy the prime's required roles.", "slug": "time_of_check_to_time_of_use_flaw", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime necessarily entails this condition."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The referent was identified, cached, checked, reserved, promised, or inferred before the action actually uses it.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime necessarily entails this condition.", "role_mapping": "The condition's entities occupy the prime's required roles.", "slug": "time_of_check_to_time_of_use_flaw", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b071_a02_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Without use-time validation, the action executes against the wrong thing, no thing, an unsafe state, or an authority condition that no longer holds. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Time, concurrency, distributed propagation, human handoff, or external update can change referent state between check and use.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Time, concurrency, distributed propagation, human handoff, or external update can change referent state between check and use.", "Without use-time validation, the action executes against the wrong thing, no thing, an unsafe state, or an authority condition that no longer holds."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Time-Of-Check To Time-Of-Use Flaw", "one_liner": "A precondition verified at one instant authorizes an action taken at a later instant, and the relevant state changes in the gap between them, so the defect lives in the temporal binding between check and use rather than in either operation.", "page_ref": "prime:time_of_check_to_time_of_use_flaw", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "The condition's entities occupy the prime's required roles.", "slug": "time_of_check_to_time_of_use_flaw", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime necessarily entails this condition."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Time, concurrency, distributed propagation, human handoff, or external update can change referent state between check and use.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate does not entail the complete condition in every instance.", "slug": "metonymy"}], "residual_id": "r:use_time_referent_validation:b071_a02_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b071_a02_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "At the moment of use, the referent may be missing, revoked, replaced, expired, moved, consumed, concurrently modified, no longer authorized, or semantically ambiguous. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Missing, stale, or changed referents create correctness, safety, security, legal, financial, or reputational harm.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Missing, stale, or changed referents create correctness, safety, security, legal, financial, or reputational harm.", "At the moment of use, the referent may be missing, revoked, replaced, expired, moved, consumed, concurrently modified, no longer authorized, or semantically ambiguous."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate does not entail the complete condition in every instance.", "slug": "metonymy"}], "normalized_requirement": "Missing, stale, or changed referents create correctness, safety, security, legal, financial, or reputational harm.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Missing, stale, or changed referents create correctness, safety, security, legal, financial, or reputational harm.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate does not entail the complete condition in every instance.", "slug": "metonymy"}], "residual_id": "r:use_time_referent_validation:b071_a02_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b071_a02_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "At the moment of use, the referent may be missing, revoked, replaced, expired, moved, consumed, concurrently modified, no longer authorized, or semantically ambiguous. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A null, missing, expired, revoked, or moved referent is currently handled by implicit assumptions, silent defaults, or late failure.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A null, missing, expired, revoked, or moved referent is currently handled by implicit assumptions, silent defaults, or late failure.", "At the moment of use, the referent may be missing, revoked, replaced, expired, moved, consumed, concurrently modified, no longer authorized, or semantically ambiguous."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate does not entail the complete condition in every instance.", "slug": "metonymy"}], "normalized_requirement": "A null, missing, expired, revoked, or moved referent is currently handled by implicit assumptions, silent defaults, or late failure.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A null, missing, expired, revoked, or moved referent is currently handled by implicit assumptions, silent defaults, or late failure.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate does not entail the complete condition in every instance.", "slug": "metonymy"}], "residual_id": "r:use_time_referent_validation:b071_a02_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b071_a02_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system or workflow treats a reference, resource, record, identity, condition, or dependency as still present and valid because it was expected, selected, checked, or true earlier. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The workflow has repeated retries, ghost records, stale approvals, inventory mismatches, expired tokens, broken links, dangling references, or race-window incidents.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The workflow has repeated retries, ghost records, stale approvals, inventory mismatches, expired tokens, broken links, dangling references, or race-window incidents.", "A system or workflow treats a reference, resource, record, identity, condition, or dependency as still present and valid because it was expected, selected, checked, or true earlier."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate does not entail the complete condition in every instance.", "slug": "metonymy"}], "normalized_requirement": "The workflow has repeated retries, ghost records, stale approvals, inventory mismatches, expired tokens, broken links, dangling references, or race-window incidents.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The workflow has repeated retries, ghost records, stale approvals, inventory mismatches, expired tokens, broken links, dangling references, or race-window incidents.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Stakeholders need a reliable distinction among valid-now, missing-now, unknown, changed, unauthorized, and fallback cases.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Stakeholders need a reliable distinction among valid-now, missing-now, unknown, changed, unauthorized, and fallback cases. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders need a reliable distinction among valid-now, missing-now, unknown, changed, unauthorized, and fallback cases."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "Stakeholders need a reliable distinction among valid-now, missing-now, unknown, changed, unauthorized, and fallback cases."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 71, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-071", "ledger_sha256": "a4461d6ced15792a6105829117926004dee9480de6f2507ef03d1ef5735f1fc2"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Use-Time Source Attribution Calibration", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:use_time_source_attribution_calibration", "slug": "use_time_source_attribution_calibration"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Items from multiple source classes are accumulated in a common store, but their provenance markers are incomplete, decayed, implicit, or unavailable at the moment of use. Downstream users then treat internally generated material as externally perceived evidence, external material as their own idea, reconstruction as observation, or low-confidence inference as settled fact. The error is not merely missing metadata; it is the failure to reconstruct and act on source class when the item is retrieved or applied.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Items from multiple source classes are accumulated in a common store, but their provenance markers are incomplete, decayed, implicit, or unavailable at the moment of use. Downstream users then treat internally generated material as externally perceived evidence, external material as their own idea, reconstruction as observation, or low-confidence inference as settled fact. The error is not merely missing metadata; it is the failure to reconstruct and act on source class when the item is retrieved or applied."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate does not entail the complete condition in every instance.", "slug": "reality_monitoring"}], "residual_id": "r:use_time_source_attribution_calibration:b071_a03_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b071_a03_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Commingled information store. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Commingled information store"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate does not entail the complete condition in every instance.", "slug": "reality_monitoring"}], "normalized_requirement": "Commingled information store", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Commingled information store", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate does not entail the complete condition in every instance.", "slug": "precision_weighting"}], "residual_id": "r:use_time_source_attribution_calibration:b071_a03_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b071_a03_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The error is not merely missing metadata; it is the failure to reconstruct and act on source class when the item is retrieved or applied. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Use depends on source class.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Use depends on source class", "The error is not merely missing metadata; it is the failure to reconstruct and act on source class when the item is retrieved or applied."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate does not entail the complete condition in every instance.", "slug": "precision_weighting"}], "normalized_requirement": "Use depends on source class", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Use depends on source class", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate does not entail the complete condition in every instance.", "slug": "past_state_contamination"}], "residual_id": "r:use_time_source_attribution_calibration:b071_a03_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b071_a03_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Source cues are indirect or degraded. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Source cues are indirect or degraded"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate does not entail the complete condition in every instance.", "slug": "past_state_contamination"}], "normalized_requirement": "Source cues are indirect or degraded", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Source cues are indirect or degraded", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime necessarily entails this condition.", "role_mapping": "The condition's entities occupy the prime's required roles.", "slug": "correlated_source_attribution_failure", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b071_a03_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Fluency can masquerade as evidence. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Fluency can masquerade as evidence"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Correlated-Source Attribution Failure", "one_liner": "When combined sources share underlying variation, joint inference stays strong while attribution to any individual source becomes unstable, sign-flipping, or arbitrary.", "page_ref": "prime:correlated_source_attribution_failure", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "The condition's entities occupy the prime's required roles.", "slug": "correlated_source_attribution_failure", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime necessarily entails this condition."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Fluency can masquerade as evidence", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime necessarily entails this condition.", "role_mapping": "The condition's entities occupy the prime's required roles.", "slug": "correlated_source_attribution_failure", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b071_a03_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Errors have downstream consequences. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Errors have downstream consequences"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Correlated-Source Attribution Failure", "one_liner": "When combined sources share underlying variation, joint inference stays strong while attribution to any individual source becomes unstable, sign-flipping, or arbitrary.", "page_ref": "prime:correlated_source_attribution_failure", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "The condition's entities occupy the prime's required roles.", "slug": "correlated_source_attribution_failure", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime necessarily entails this condition."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Errors have downstream consequences", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Corroboration is possible for important cases.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Corroboration is possible for important cases. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Corroboration is possible for important cases"]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Corroboration is possible for important cases"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 71, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-071", "ledger_sha256": "a4461d6ced15792a6105829117926004dee9480de6f2507ef03d1ef5735f1fc2"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "User Context Validation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:user_context_validation", "slug": "user_context_validation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 5, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is design by projection. A team uses internal reasoning, expert knowledge, stakeholder preference, old personas, or proxy feedback to infer what users need and how they will behave. That inference may be efficient, but it can hide the conditions that make real use different from imagined use.\n\nThe mismatch often appears late: low adoption, repeated support requests, informal workarounds, abandonment, user blame, inequitable access, or redesign after launch. The deeper issue is that the design was validated against internal coherence rather than user reality.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A design assumes user needs, behavior, comprehension, motivation, access, or workflow without grounding those assumptions in the actual contexts where people will use, resist, adapt, or be affected by the solution."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime necessarily entails this condition.", "role_mapping": "The condition's entities occupy the prime's required roles.", "slug": "validation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b071_a04_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A team uses internal reasoning, expert knowledge, stakeholder preference, old personas, or proxy feedback to infer what users need and how they will behave. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Designers, sponsors, or experts are making claims about what users need or will do.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Designers, sponsors, or experts are making claims about what users need or will do.", "A team uses internal reasoning, expert knowledge, stakeholder preference, old personas, or proxy feedback to infer what users need and how they will behave."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Validation", "one_liner": "Confirming that an artifact actually solves the intended problem in its real operational context, as distinct from confirming it was merely built to specification.", "page_ref": "prime:validation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "The condition's entities occupy the prime's required roles.", "slug": "validation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime necessarily entails this condition."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Designers, sponsors, or experts are making claims about what users need or will do.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime necessarily entails this condition.", "role_mapping": "The condition's entities occupy the prime's required roles.", "slug": "validation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b071_a04_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful before scale-up, before locking requirements, before launching a service or policy, after signs of user friction, or when the affected users differ substantially from the team designing the solution. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The target users differ meaningfully from the design team in knowledge, language, power, constraints, tools, culture, or risk exposure.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The target users differ meaningfully from the design team in knowledge, language, power, constraints, tools, culture, or risk exposure.", "It is especially useful before scale-up, before locking requirements, before launching a service or policy, after signs of user friction, or when the affected users differ substantially from the team designing the solution."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Validation", "one_liner": "Confirming that an artifact actually solves the intended problem in its real operational context, as distinct from confirming it was merely built to specification.", "page_ref": "prime:validation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "The condition's entities occupy the prime's required roles.", "slug": "validation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime necessarily entails this condition."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The target users differ meaningfully from the design team in knowledge, language, power, constraints, tools, culture, or risk exposure.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime necessarily entails this condition.", "role_mapping": "The condition's entities occupy the prime's required roles.", "slug": "validation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b071_a04_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A design assumes user needs, behavior, comprehension, motivation, access, or workflow without grounding those assumptions in the actual contexts where people will use, resist, adapt, or be affected by the solution. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Adoption depends on workflow, timing, surrounding systems, social context, or emotional trust.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Adoption depends on workflow, timing, surrounding systems, social context, or emotional trust.", "A design assumes user needs, behavior, comprehension, motivation, access, or workflow without grounding those assumptions in the actual contexts where people will use, resist, adapt, or be affected by the solution."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Validation", "one_liner": "Confirming that an artifact actually solves the intended problem in its real operational context, as distinct from confirming it was merely built to specification.", "page_ref": "prime:validation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "The condition's entities occupy the prime's required roles.", "slug": "validation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime necessarily entails this condition."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Adoption depends on workflow, timing, surrounding systems, social context, or emotional trust.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime necessarily entails this condition.", "role_mapping": "The condition's entities occupy the prime's required roles.", "slug": "validation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b071_a04_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It also applies when the solution touches trust, dignity, safety, accessibility, privacy, institutional burden, or unequal access. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The solution touches accessibility, dignity, safety, privacy, identity, rights, or institutional trust.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The solution touches accessibility, dignity, safety, privacy, identity, rights, or institutional trust.", "It also applies when the solution touches trust, dignity, safety, accessibility, privacy, institutional burden, or unequal access."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Validation", "one_liner": "Confirming that an artifact actually solves the intended problem in its real operational context, as distinct from confirming it was merely built to specification.", "page_ref": "prime:validation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "The condition's entities occupy the prime's required roles.", "slug": "validation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime necessarily entails this condition."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The solution touches accessibility, dignity, safety, privacy, identity, rights, or institutional trust.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime necessarily entails this condition.", "role_mapping": "The condition's entities occupy the prime's required roles.", "slug": "validation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b071_a04_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The mismatch often appears late: low adoption, repeated support requests, informal workarounds, abandonment, user blame, inequitable access, or redesign after launch. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A previous version generated workarounds, abandonment, confusion, complaints, inequitable outcomes, or support burden.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A previous version generated workarounds, abandonment, confusion, complaints, inequitable outcomes, or support burden.", "The mismatch often appears late: low adoption, repeated support requests, informal workarounds, abandonment, user blame, inequitable access, or redesign after launch."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Validation", "one_liner": "Confirming that an artifact actually solves the intended problem in its real operational context, as distinct from confirming it was merely built to specification.", "page_ref": "prime:validation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "The condition's entities occupy the prime's required roles.", "slug": "validation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime necessarily entails this condition."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A previous version generated workarounds, abandonment, confusion, complaints, inequitable outcomes, or support burden.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Early feedback is dominated by internal stakeholders, experts, proxy users, or vocal participants.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A team uses internal reasoning, expert knowledge, stakeholder preference, old personas, or proxy feedback to infer what users need and how they will behave. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Early feedback is dominated by internal stakeholders, experts, proxy users, or vocal participants. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Early feedback is dominated by internal stakeholders, experts, proxy users, or vocal participants.", "A team uses internal reasoning, expert knowledge, stakeholder preference, old personas, or proxy feedback to infer what users need and how they will behave."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Early feedback is dominated by internal stakeholders, experts, proxy users, or vocal participants."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 71, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-071", "ledger_sha256": "a4461d6ced15792a6105829117926004dee9480de6f2507ef03d1ef5735f1fc2"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Vantage Coverage-Gap Mapping and Correction", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:vantage_coverage_gap_mapping_and_correction", "slug": "vantage_coverage_gap_mapping_and_correction"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 5, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 6 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "An apparatus, role, dataset, survey, interface, camera, report channel, analytic frame, or institutional position makes some parts of a landscape easy to observe while making others systematically unreachable, unreportable, unlogged, or unintelligible. Because the output is clean, official, or operationally convenient, users treat it as the whole landscape rather than as the landscape restricted to that vantage. The resulting omissions are not random noise; they are structured blind zones created by where the apparatus can stand, what it can sample, and what it counts as visible.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "An apparatus, role, dataset, survey, interface, camera, report channel, analytic frame, or institutional position makes some parts of a landscape easy to observe while making others systematically unreachable, unreportable, unlogged, or unintelligible. Because the output is clean, official, or operationally convenient, users treat it as the whole landscape rather than as the landscape restricted to that vantage. The resulting omissions are not random noise; they are structured blind zones created by where the apparatus can stand, what it can sample, and what it counts as visible."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate does not entail the complete condition in every instance.", "slug": "streetlight_effect"}], "residual_id": "r:vantage_coverage_gap_mapping_and_correction:b071_a05_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b071_a05_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "An apparatus, role, dataset, survey, interface, camera, report channel, analytic frame, or institutional position makes some parts of a landscape easy to observe while making others systematically unreachable, unreportable, unlogged, or unintelligible. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A decision depends on evidence gathered from a single vantage, role, instrument, interface, data source, location, language, channel, permission level, or analytic frame.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A decision depends on evidence gathered from a single vantage, role, instrument, interface, data source, location, language, channel, permission level, or analytic frame.", "An apparatus, role, dataset, survey, interface, camera, report channel, analytic frame, or institutional position makes some parts of a landscape easy to observe while making others systematically unreachable, unreportable, unlogged, or unintelligible."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate does not entail the complete condition in every instance.", "slug": "streetlight_effect"}], "normalized_requirement": "A decision depends on evidence gathered from a single vantage, role, instrument, interface, data source, location, language, channel, permission level, or analytic frame.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A decision depends on evidence gathered from a single vantage, role, instrument, interface, data source, location, language, channel, permission level, or analytic frame.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate does not entail the complete condition in every instance.", "slug": "viewpoint"}], "residual_id": "r:vantage_coverage_gap_mapping_and_correction:b071_a05_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b071_a05_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "An apparatus, role, dataset, survey, interface, camera, report channel, analytic frame, or institutional position makes some parts of a landscape easy to observe while making others systematically unreachable, unreportable, unlogged, or unintelligible. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The observation process has known access constraints: line of sight, platform eligibility, reporting burden, sensor range, survey frame, channel availability, institutional trust, role incentives, or classification rules.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The observation process has known access constraints: line of sight, platform eligibility, reporting burden, sensor range, survey frame, channel availability, institutional trust, role incentives, or classification rules.", "An apparatus, role, dataset, survey, interface, camera, report channel, analytic frame, or institutional position makes some parts of a landscape easy to observe while making others systematically unreachable, unreportable, unlogged, or unintelligible."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate does not entail the complete condition in every instance.", "slug": "viewpoint"}], "normalized_requirement": "The observation process has known access constraints: line of sight, platform eligibility, reporting burden, sensor range, survey frame, channel availability, institutional trust, role incentives, or classification rules.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The observation process has known access constraints: line of sight, platform eligibility, reporting burden, sensor range, survey frame, channel availability, institutional trust, role incentives, or classification rules.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate does not entail the complete condition in every instance.", "slug": "confidence_annotation"}], "residual_id": "r:vantage_coverage_gap_mapping_and_correction:b071_a05_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b071_a05_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Because the output is clean, official, or operationally convenient, users treat it as the whole landscape rather than as the landscape restricted to that vantage. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: People are making claims about the whole population, terrain, process, market, community, risk field, or option set from a partial output.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["People are making claims about the whole population, terrain, process, market, community, risk field, or option set from a partial output.", "Because the output is clean, official, or operationally convenient, users treat it as the whole landscape rather than as the landscape restricted to that vantage."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate does not entail the complete condition in every instance.", "slug": "confidence_annotation"}], "normalized_requirement": "People are making claims about the whole population, terrain, process, market, community, risk field, or option set from a partial output.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "People are making claims about the whole population, terrain, process, market, community, risk field, or option set from a partial output.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime necessarily entails this condition.", "role_mapping": "The condition's entities occupy the prime's required roles.", "slug": "vantage_induced_omission", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b071_a05_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Certain regions or actors have low visibility because they lack access, opt out, are excluded, are silent, are unauthorized, are offline, are physically hidden, or are filtered out before measurement. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Certain regions or actors have low visibility because they lack access, opt out, are excluded, are silent, are unauthorized, are offline, are physically hidden, or are filtered out before measurement."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Vantage-Induced Omission", "one_liner": "An apparatus's structural vantage makes some regions of a landscape reachable and others constitutively invisible, so its output is mistaken for the landscape rather than the landscape-restricted-to-its-vantage.", "page_ref": "prime:vantage_induced_omission", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "The condition's entities occupy the prime's required roles.", "slug": "vantage_induced_omission", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime necessarily entails this condition."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Certain regions or actors have low visibility because they lack access, opt out, are excluded, are silent, are unauthorized, are offline, are physically hidden, or are filtered out before measurement.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate does not entail the complete condition in every instance.", "slug": "absence_as_information"}], "residual_id": "r:vantage_coverage_gap_mapping_and_correction:b071_a05_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b071_a05_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Absence of evidence is being interpreted as evidence of absence even though the vantage could not reliably detect the missing case. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Absence of evidence is being interpreted as evidence of absence even though the vantage could not reliably detect the missing case."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate does not entail the complete condition in every instance.", "slug": "absence_as_information"}], "normalized_requirement": "Absence of evidence is being interpreted as evidence of absence even though the vantage could not reliably detect the missing case.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Absence of evidence is being interpreted as evidence of absence even though the vantage could not reliably detect the missing case.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate does not entail the complete condition in every instance.", "slug": "selection_visibility_gate"}], "residual_id": "r:vantage_coverage_gap_mapping_and_correction:b071_a05_c7", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b071_a05_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A downstream model, dashboard, ranking, map, policy, or narrative inherits data from the partial vantage without preserving the vantage boundary. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A downstream model, dashboard, ranking, map, policy, or narrative inherits data from the partial vantage without preserving the vantage boundary."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate does not entail the complete condition in every instance.", "slug": "selection_visibility_gate"}], "normalized_requirement": "A downstream model, dashboard, ranking, map, policy, or narrative inherits data from the partial vantage without preserving the vantage boundary.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A downstream model, dashboard, ranking, map, policy, or narrative inherits data from the partial vantage without preserving the vantage boundary.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The costs of adding alternate vantages are real, so teams are tempted to overstate the certainty or completeness of the current view.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "But the usefulness of that reduction makes it tempting to forget the restriction and treat vantage-bound visibility as reality itself. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The costs of adding alternate vantages are real, so teams are tempted to overstate the certainty or completeness of the current view. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The costs of adding alternate vantages are real, so teams are tempted to overstate the certainty or completeness of the current view.", "But the usefulness of that reduction makes it tempting to forget the restriction and treat vantage-bound visibility as reality itself."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The costs of adding alternate vantages are real, so teams are tempted to overstate the certainty or completeness of the current view."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 71, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-071", "ledger_sha256": "a4461d6ced15792a6105829117926004dee9480de6f2507ef03d1ef5735f1fc2"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Variability Characterization", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:variability_characterization", "slug": "variability_characterization"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 5 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is premature interpretation of difference. A system observes variation across people, sites, measurements, cases, outcomes, time periods, or contexts, but it lacks a reliable account of what the variation means.\n\nOne team may treat the differences as noise and average them away. Another may treat every visible difference as a meaningful subgroup. A third may try to reduce all variance because consistency feels safer. Each response can be wrong when the variation has not been characterized.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system observes differences across cases, measurements, groups, times, sites, or outcomes but lacks a disciplined account of what those differences mean or how they should influence action."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate does not entail the complete condition in every instance.", "slug": "covariance"}], "residual_id": "r:variability_characterization:b071_a06_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b071_a06_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system observes variation across people, sites, measurements, cases, outcomes, time periods, or contexts, but it lacks a reliable account of what the variation means. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Observed outcomes or measurements differ across units, groups, contexts, sites, time periods, or implementations.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Observed outcomes or measurements differ across units, groups, contexts, sites, time periods, or implementations.", "A system observes variation across people, sites, measurements, cases, outcomes, time periods, or contexts, but it lacks a reliable account of what the variation means."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate does not entail the complete condition in every instance.", "slug": "covariance"}], "normalized_requirement": "Observed outcomes or measurements differ across units, groups, contexts, sites, time periods, or implementations.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Observed outcomes or measurements differ across units, groups, contexts, sites, time periods, or implementations.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate does not entail the complete condition in every instance.", "slug": "law_of_large_numbers"}], "residual_id": "r:variability_characterization:b071_a06_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b071_a06_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Averages are hiding important spread, tails, clusters, or subgroup patterns. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Averages are hiding important spread, tails, clusters, or subgroup patterns."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate does not entail the complete condition in every instance.", "slug": "law_of_large_numbers"}], "normalized_requirement": "Averages are hiding important spread, tails, clusters, or subgroup patterns.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Averages are hiding important spread, tails, clusters, or subgroup patterns.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate does not entail the complete condition in every instance.", "slug": "bayesian_cue_integration"}], "residual_id": "r:variability_characterization:b071_a06_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b071_a06_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A third may try to reduce all variance because consistency feels safer. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The system is tempted to standardize, reduce variance, target subgroups, or ignore differences before knowing what kind of variation it is seeing.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The system is tempted to standardize, reduce variance, target subgroups, or ignore differences before knowing what kind of variation it is seeing.", "A third may try to reduce all variance because consistency feels safer."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate does not entail the complete condition in every instance.", "slug": "bayesian_cue_integration"}], "normalized_requirement": "The system is tempted to standardize, reduce variance, target subgroups, or ignore differences before knowing what kind of variation it is seeing.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The system is tempted to standardize, reduce variance, target subgroups, or ignore differences before knowing what kind of variation it is seeing.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime necessarily entails this condition.", "role_mapping": "The condition's entities occupy the prime's required roles.", "slug": "randomness", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b071_a06_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when averages feel misleading, when groups or contexts appear to differ, when a process has unstable outputs, when an intervention may need tailoring, or when a system is about to reduce variation without knowing whether the variation is harmful. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A decision depends on whether variation is random noise, meaningful signal, measurement artifact, context effect, process instability, or population difference.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A decision depends on whether variation is random noise, meaningful signal, measurement artifact, context effect, process instability, or population difference.", "It is especially useful when averages feel misleading, when groups or contexts appear to differ, when a process has unstable outputs, when an intervention may need tailoring, or when a system is about to reduce variation without knowing whether the variation is harmful."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Randomness", "one_liner": "Model unpredictability.", "page_ref": "prime:randomness", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "The condition's entities occupy the prime's required roles.", "slug": "randomness", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime necessarily entails this condition."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A decision depends on whether variation is random noise, meaningful signal, measurement artifact, context effect, process instability, or population difference.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate does not entail the complete condition in every instance.", "slug": "approximation"}], "residual_id": "r:variability_characterization:b071_a06_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b071_a06_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "One team may treat the differences as noise and average them away. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: There is disagreement about whether differences should be treated as normal, unfair, addressable, expected, or dangerous.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["There is disagreement about whether differences should be treated as normal, unfair, addressable, expected, or dangerous.", "One team may treat the differences as noise and average them away."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate does not entail the complete condition in every instance.", "slug": "approximation"}], "normalized_requirement": "There is disagreement about whether differences should be treated as normal, unfair, addressable, expected, or dangerous.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "There is disagreement about whether differences should be treated as normal, unfair, addressable, expected, or dangerous.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A recurring pattern may be driven by sampling, coding, instrumentation, missingness, or time-window effects.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: A recurring pattern may be driven by sampling, coding, instrumentation, missingness, or time-window effects. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A recurring pattern may be driven by sampling, coding, instrumentation, missingness, or time-window effects."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "A recurring pattern may be driven by sampling, coding, instrumentation, missingness, or time-window effects."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 71, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-071", "ledger_sha256": "a4461d6ced15792a6105829117926004dee9480de6f2507ef03d1ef5735f1fc2"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Variance Reduction", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:variance_reduction", "slug": "variance_reduction"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 5 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is excessive or unwanted spread. A process may produce very different outputs for similar inputs. A measurement system may give inconsistent readings for equivalent cases. A decision process may treat comparable people differently depending on reviewer or site. An experiment may fail to detect a signal because uncontrolled variation is too large.\n\nThe root tension is that real systems always vary. Some variation is legitimate and valuable; some is noise, drift, inconsistency, error, or unfairness. Variance Reduction works only when the system can distinguish the two well enough to reduce the unwanted part without flattening the meaningful part.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system produces measurements, outputs, decisions, experiences, or outcomes whose spread is too wide, too noisy, too unstable, or too inconsistent for interpretation, fairness, quality, reliability, or control."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate does not entail the complete condition in every instance.", "slug": "cross_dimensional_leakage"}], "residual_id": "r:variance_reduction:b071_a07_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b071_a07_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A decision process may treat comparable people differently depending on reviewer or site. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Outputs that should be comparable differ widely across people, sites, tools, batches, shifts, time periods, or channels.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Outputs that should be comparable differ widely across people, sites, tools, batches, shifts, time periods, or channels.", "A decision process may treat comparable people differently depending on reviewer or site."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate does not entail the complete condition in every instance.", "slug": "cross_dimensional_leakage"}], "normalized_requirement": "Outputs that should be comparable differ widely across people, sites, tools, batches, shifts, time periods, or channels.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Outputs that should be comparable differ widely across people, sites, tools, batches, shifts, time periods, or channels.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime necessarily entails this condition.", "role_mapping": "The condition's entities occupy the prime's required roles.", "slug": "measurement_uncertainty", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b071_a07_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Reducing too little leaves noise and instability; reducing too much erases meaningful difference and useful flexibility. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Noise obscures a meaningful signal, trend, effect, difference, or performance change.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Noise obscures a meaningful signal, trend, effect, difference, or performance change.", "Reducing too little leaves noise and instability; reducing too much erases meaningful difference and useful flexibility."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Measurement Uncertainty and Observational Noise", "one_liner": "Measurement noise arises from instrument and observation limits.", "page_ref": "prime:measurement_uncertainty", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "The condition's entities occupy the prime's required roles.", "slug": "measurement_uncertainty", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime necessarily entails this condition."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Noise obscures a meaningful signal, trend, effect, difference, or performance change.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate does not entail the complete condition in every instance.", "slug": "bayesian_cue_integration"}], "residual_id": "r:variance_reduction:b071_a07_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b071_a07_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The system cannot tell whether a change represents improvement, deterioration, random fluctuation, measurement artifact, or case-mix difference. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The system cannot tell whether a change represents improvement, deterioration, random fluctuation, measurement artifact, or case-mix difference."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate does not entail the complete condition in every instance.", "slug": "bayesian_cue_integration"}], "normalized_requirement": "The system cannot tell whether a change represents improvement, deterioration, random fluctuation, measurement artifact, or case-mix difference.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The system cannot tell whether a change represents improvement, deterioration, random fluctuation, measurement artifact, or case-mix difference.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate does not entail the complete condition in every instance.", "slug": "simpson_yule_effect"}], "residual_id": "r:variance_reduction:b071_a07_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b071_a07_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Users, customers, patients, students, or applicants experience materially different treatment for reasons not justified by relevant differences. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Users, customers, patients, students, or applicants experience materially different treatment for reasons not justified by relevant differences."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate does not entail the complete condition in every instance.", "slug": "simpson_yule_effect"}], "normalized_requirement": "Users, customers, patients, students, or applicants experience materially different treatment for reasons not justified by relevant differences.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Users, customers, patients, students, or applicants experience materially different treatment for reasons not justified by relevant differences.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate does not entail the complete condition in every instance.", "slug": "bayesian_cue_integration"}], "residual_id": "r:variance_reduction:b071_a07_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b071_a07_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A decision process may treat comparable people differently depending on reviewer or site. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A standard, policy, model, experiment, or decision rule depends on consistent measurement or comparable execution.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A standard, policy, model, experiment, or decision rule depends on consistent measurement or comparable execution.", "A decision process may treat comparable people differently depending on reviewer or site."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate does not entail the complete condition in every instance.", "slug": "bayesian_cue_integration"}], "normalized_requirement": "A standard, policy, model, experiment, or decision rule depends on consistent measurement or comparable execution.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A standard, policy, model, experiment, or decision rule depends on consistent measurement or comparable execution.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Process instability creates rework, defects, delays, unpredictable costs, safety risks, or unreliable service.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The object of variation may be a measurement, decision, process step, service experience, output quality, cost, lead time, defect rate, model result, or outcome. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Process instability creates rework, defects, delays, unpredictable costs, safety risks, or unreliable service. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Process instability creates rework, defects, delays, unpredictable costs, safety risks, or unreliable service.", "The object of variation may be a measurement, decision, process step, service experience, output quality, cost, lead time, defect rate, model result, or outcome."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "Process instability creates rework, defects, delays, unpredictable costs, safety risks, or unreliable service."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 71, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-071", "ledger_sha256": "a4461d6ced15792a6105829117926004dee9480de6f2507ef03d1ef5735f1fc2"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Variation Consolidation and Feature Selection", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:variation_consolidation_feature_selection", "slug": "variation_consolidation_feature_selection"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system has produced multiple variants through experimentation, local adaptation, branching, prototyping, or exploratory work, but lacks a disciplined way to decide which variants should become durable features, which should remain contextual options, and which should be retired.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system has produced multiple variants through experimentation, local adaptation, branching, prototyping, or exploratory work, but lacks a disciplined way to decide which variants should become durable features, which should remain contextual options, and which should be retired."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate does not entail the complete condition in every instance.", "slug": "selection_visibility_gate"}], "residual_id": "r:variation_consolidation_feature_selection:b071_a08_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b071_a08_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system has produced multiple variants through experimentation, local adaptation, branching, prototyping, or exploratory work, but lacks a disciplined way to decide which variants should become durable features, which should remain contextual options, and which should be retired. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Several variants, pilots, prototypes, practices, branches, or candidate features already exist.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Several variants, pilots, prototypes, practices, branches, or candidate features already exist.", "A system has produced multiple variants through experimentation, local adaptation, branching, prototyping, or exploratory work, but lacks a disciplined way to decide which variants should become durable features, which should remain contextual options, and which should be retired."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate does not entail the complete condition in every instance.", "slug": "selection_visibility_gate"}], "normalized_requirement": "Several variants, pilots, prototypes, practices, branches, or candidate features already exist.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Several variants, pilots, prototypes, practices, branches, or candidate features already exist.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate does not entail the complete condition in every instance.", "slug": "selection_bias"}], "residual_id": "r:variation_consolidation_feature_selection:b071_a08_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b071_a08_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The archetype resolves the tension by separating generation from selection: protect exploration long enough to learn, then deliberately retain, merge, contextualize, or retire variants. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The organization or system has enough evidence to compare alternatives but no agreed selection frame.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The organization or system has enough evidence to compare alternatives but no agreed selection frame.", "The archetype resolves the tension by separating generation from selection: protect exploration long enough to learn, then deliberately retain, merge, contextualize, or retire variants."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate does not entail the complete condition in every instance.", "slug": "selection_bias"}], "normalized_requirement": "The organization or system has enough evidence to compare alternatives but no agreed selection frame.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The organization or system has enough evidence to compare alternatives but no agreed selection frame.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime necessarily entails this condition.", "role_mapping": "The condition's entities occupy the prime's required roles.", "slug": "variation_strategies", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b071_a08_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system has produced multiple variants through experimentation, local adaptation, branching, prototyping, or exploratory work, but lacks a disciplined way to decide which variants should become durable features, which should remain contextual options, and which should be retired. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Experimentation is producing learning, but that learning is not being converted into stable design, policy, release, or practice.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Experimentation is producing learning, but that learning is not being converted into stable design, policy, release, or practice.", "A system has produced multiple variants through experimentation, local adaptation, branching, prototyping, or exploratory work, but lacks a disciplined way to decide which variants should become durable features, which should remain contextual options, and which should be retired."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Variation Strategies", "one_liner": "Deliberately injecting controlled variation into a system and selecting from the results to explore alternatives, accelerate learning, and gain robustness.", "page_ref": "prime:variation_strategies", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "The condition's entities occupy the prime's required roles.", "slug": "variation_strategies", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime necessarily entails this condition."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Experimentation is producing learning, but that learning is not being converted into stable design, policy, release, or practice.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime necessarily entails this condition.", "role_mapping": "The condition's entities occupy the prime's required roles.", "slug": "variation_strategies", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b071_a08_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system has produced multiple variants through experimentation, local adaptation, branching, prototyping, or exploratory work, but lacks a disciplined way to decide which variants should become durable features, which should remain contextual options, and which should be retired. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Multiple local adaptations solve similar problems, creating both useful diversity and coordination burden.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Multiple local adaptations solve similar problems, creating both useful diversity and coordination burden.", "A system has produced multiple variants through experimentation, local adaptation, branching, prototyping, or exploratory work, but lacks a disciplined way to decide which variants should become durable features, which should remain contextual options, and which should be retired."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Variation Strategies", "one_liner": "Deliberately injecting controlled variation into a system and selecting from the results to explore alternatives, accelerate learning, and gain robustness.", "page_ref": "prime:variation_strategies", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "The condition's entities occupy the prime's required roles.", "slug": "variation_strategies", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime necessarily entails this condition."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Multiple local adaptations solve similar problems, creating both useful diversity and coordination burden.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate does not entail the complete condition in every instance.", "slug": "selection_on_noisy_estimates"}], "residual_id": "r:variation_consolidation_feature_selection:b071_a08_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b071_a08_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A product, process, model, or institution risks accumulating experimental clutter. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A product, process, model, or institution risks accumulating experimental clutter."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate does not entail the complete condition in every instance.", "slug": "selection_on_noisy_estimates"}], "normalized_requirement": "A product, process, model, or institution risks accumulating experimental clutter.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A product, process, model, or institution risks accumulating experimental clutter.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate does not entail the complete condition in every instance.", "slug": "simpson_yule_effect"}], "residual_id": "r:variation_consolidation_feature_selection:b071_a08_c7", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b071_a08_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Stakeholders disagree about whether a variant succeeded because they use different success criteria. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders disagree about whether a variant succeeded because they use different success criteria."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate does not entail the complete condition in every instance.", "slug": "simpson_yule_effect"}], "normalized_requirement": "Stakeholders disagree about whether a variant succeeded because they use different success criteria.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Stakeholders disagree about whether a variant succeeded because they use different success criteria.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A consolidation decision must preserve the value of exploration without collapsing necessary contextual diversity.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: A consolidation decision must preserve the value of exploration without collapsing necessary contextual diversity. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A consolidation decision must preserve the value of exploration without collapsing necessary contextual diversity."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "A consolidation decision must preserve the value of exploration without collapsing necessary contextual diversity."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 71, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-071", "ledger_sha256": "a4461d6ced15792a6105829117926004dee9480de6f2507ef03d1ef5735f1fc2"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Variation–Selection–Retention Engine Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:variation_selection_retention_engine_design", "slug": "variation_selection_retention_engine_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system contains multiple variants that persist, spread, die out, mutate, recombine, or reproduce over time, but the selection loop is implicit. Without an explicit frame, the system may select for the wrong trait, consume its own diversity, mistake short-term survival for fitness, ignore inherited failure modes, or create escape variants that exploit the selection pressure.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system contains multiple variants that persist, spread, die out, mutate, recombine, or reproduce over time, but the selection loop is implicit. Without an explicit frame, the system may select for the wrong trait, consume its own diversity, mistake short-term survival for fitness, ignore inherited failure modes, or create escape variants that exploit the selection pressure."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate does not entail the complete condition in every instance.", "slug": "natural_selection"}], "residual_id": "r:variation_selection_retention_engine_design:b071_a09_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b071_a09_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Variant population exists. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Variant population exists"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate does not entail the complete condition in every instance.", "slug": "natural_selection"}], "normalized_requirement": "Variant population exists", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Variant population exists", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime necessarily entails this condition.", "role_mapping": "The condition's entities occupy the prime's required roles.", "slug": "selection_visibility_gate", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b071_a09_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Differential persistence occurs. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Differential persistence occurs"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Selection-Visibility Gate", "one_liner": "A selector can differentially retain only variants whose consequences are expressed and accessible when selection acts, so an upstream visibility gate biases the surviving record away from the generated variant distribution.", "page_ref": "prime:selection_visibility_gate", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "The condition's entities occupy the prime's required roles.", "slug": "selection_visibility_gate", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime necessarily entails this condition."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Differential persistence occurs", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime necessarily entails this condition.", "role_mapping": "The condition's entities occupy the prime's required roles.", "slug": "selection_visibility_gate", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b071_a09_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Traits carry forward. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Traits carry forward"]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Selection-Visibility Gate", "one_liner": "A selector can differentially retain only variants whose consequences are expressed and accessible when selection acts, so an upstream visibility gate biases the surviving record away from the generated variant distribution.", "page_ref": "prime:selection_visibility_gate", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "The condition's entities occupy the prime's required roles.", "slug": "selection_visibility_gate", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime necessarily entails this condition."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Traits carry forward", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime necessarily entails this condition.", "role_mapping": "The condition's entities occupy the prime's required roles.", "slug": "selection_visibility_gate", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b071_a09_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Selection needs pressure strong enough to differentiate variants, but pressure that is too narrow, too stale, too gameable, or too intense can destroy the variation needed for future adaptation or select for traits that undermine the larger system. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Selection pressure is meaningful but incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Selection pressure is meaningful but incomplete", "Selection needs pressure strong enough to differentiate variants, but pressure that is too narrow, too stale, too gameable, or too intense can destroy the variation needed for future adaptation or select for traits that undermine the larger system."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Selection-Visibility Gate", "one_liner": "A selector can differentially retain only variants whose consequences are expressed and accessible when selection acts, so an upstream visibility gate biases the surviving record away from the generated variant distribution.", "page_ref": "prime:selection_visibility_gate", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "The condition's entities occupy the prime's required roles.", "slug": "selection_visibility_gate", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime necessarily entails this condition."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Selection pressure is meaningful but incomplete", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime necessarily entails this condition.", "role_mapping": "The condition's entities occupy the prime's required roles.", "slug": "selection_visibility_gate", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b071_a09_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Selection needs pressure strong enough to differentiate variants, but pressure that is too narrow, too stale, too gameable, or too intense can destroy the variation needed for future adaptation or select for traits that undermine the larger system. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Diversity matters for future adaptation.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Diversity matters for future adaptation", "Selection needs pressure strong enough to differentiate variants, but pressure that is too narrow, too stale, too gameable, or too intense can destroy the variation needed for future adaptation or select for traits that undermine the larger system."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Selection-Visibility Gate", "one_liner": "A selector can differentially retain only variants whose consequences are expressed and accessible when selection acts, so an upstream visibility gate biases the surviving record away from the generated variant distribution.", "page_ref": "prime:selection_visibility_gate", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "The condition's entities occupy the prime's required roles.", "slug": "selection_visibility_gate", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime necessarily entails this condition."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Diversity matters for future adaptation", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Unintended adaptation is plausible.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Unintended adaptation is plausible. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Unintended adaptation is plausible"]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Unintended adaptation is plausible"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 71, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-071", "ledger_sha256": "a4461d6ced15792a6105829117926004dee9480de6f2507ef03d1ef5735f1fc2"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Variational System Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:variational_system_design", "slug": "variational_system_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system-design problem is being solved through local heuristics, isolated optimization, or ad hoc tradeoffs even though the important cost or value accumulates across a complete trajectory, architecture, policy, or configuration.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system-design problem is being solved through local heuristics, isolated optimization, or ad hoc tradeoffs even though the important cost or value accumulates across a complete trajectory, architecture, policy, or configuration."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime necessarily entails this condition.", "role_mapping": "The condition's entities occupy the prime's required roles.", "slug": "factorial_design", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b071_a10_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system-design problem is being solved through local heuristics, isolated optimization, or ad hoc tradeoffs even though the important cost or value accumulates across a complete trajectory, architecture, policy, or configuration. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The design object is a whole path, sequence, structure, control policy, architecture, or configuration rather than a single local choice.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The design object is a whole path, sequence, structure, control policy, architecture, or configuration rather than a single local choice.", "A system-design problem is being solved through local heuristics, isolated optimization, or ad hoc tradeoffs even though the important cost or value accumulates across a complete trajectory, architecture, policy, or configuration."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Factorial Design", "one_liner": "Multiple variables tested together.", "page_ref": "prime:factorial_design", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "The condition's entities occupy the prime's required roles.", "slug": "factorial_design", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime necessarily entails this condition."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The design object is a whole path, sequence, structure, control policy, architecture, or configuration rather than a single local choice.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime necessarily entails this condition.", "role_mapping": "The condition's entities occupy the prime's required roles.", "slug": "factorial_design", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b071_a10_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The archetype resolves this by making the whole candidate path or structure the object of evaluation, while preserving the constraints that keep the solution feasible and legitimate. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Costs, risks, friction, energy, resistance, or discrepancy accumulate across the candidate solution.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Costs, risks, friction, energy, resistance, or discrepancy accumulate across the candidate solution.", "The archetype resolves this by making the whole candidate path or structure the object of evaluation, while preserving the constraints that keep the solution feasible and legitimate."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Factorial Design", "one_liner": "Multiple variables tested together.", "page_ref": "prime:factorial_design", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "The condition's entities occupy the prime's required roles.", "slug": "factorial_design", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime necessarily entails this condition."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Costs, risks, friction, energy, resistance, or discrepancy accumulate across the candidate solution.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate does not entail the complete condition in every instance.", "slug": "robustness"}], "residual_id": "r:variational_system_design:b071_a10_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b071_a10_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The archetype resolves this by making the whole candidate path or structure the object of evaluation, while preserving the constraints that keep the solution feasible and legitimate. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A solution must satisfy fixed endpoints, boundary conditions, interface requirements, safety constraints, or conserved quantities.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A solution must satisfy fixed endpoints, boundary conditions, interface requirements, safety constraints, or conserved quantities.", "The archetype resolves this by making the whole candidate path or structure the object of evaluation, while preserving the constraints that keep the solution feasible and legitimate."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate does not entail the complete condition in every instance.", "slug": "robustness"}], "normalized_requirement": "A solution must satisfy fixed endpoints, boundary conditions, interface requirements, safety constraints, or conserved quantities.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A solution must satisfy fixed endpoints, boundary conditions, interface requirements, safety constraints, or conserved quantities.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate does not entail the complete condition in every instance.", "slug": "local_optimum"}], "residual_id": "r:variational_system_design:b071_a10_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b071_a10_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system-design problem is being solved through local heuristics, isolated optimization, or ad hoc tradeoffs even though the important cost or value accumulates across a complete trajectory, architecture, policy, or configuration. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Local optimization produces globally poor or high-friction solutions.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Local optimization produces globally poor or high-friction solutions.", "A system-design problem is being solved through local heuristics, isolated optimization, or ad hoc tradeoffs even though the important cost or value accumulates across a complete trajectory, architecture, policy, or configuration."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate does not entail the complete condition in every instance.", "slug": "local_optimum"}], "normalized_requirement": "Local optimization produces globally poor or high-friction solutions.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Local optimization produces globally poor or high-friction solutions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate does not entail the complete condition in every instance.", "slug": "linear_programming_lp"}], "residual_id": "r:variational_system_design:b071_a10_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b071_a10_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The archetype resolves this by making the whole candidate path or structure the object of evaluation, while preserving the constraints that keep the solution feasible and legitimate. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Several feasible trajectories or structures exist, but decision makers lack a shared whole-solution objective.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Several feasible trajectories or structures exist, but decision makers lack a shared whole-solution objective.", "The archetype resolves this by making the whole candidate path or structure the object of evaluation, while preserving the constraints that keep the solution feasible and legitimate."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate does not entail the complete condition in every instance.", "slug": "linear_programming_lp"}], "normalized_requirement": "Several feasible trajectories or structures exist, but decision makers lack a shared whole-solution objective.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Several feasible trajectories or structures exist, but decision makers lack a shared whole-solution objective.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime necessarily entails this condition.", "role_mapping": "The condition's entities occupy the prime's required roles.", "slug": "factorial_design", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b071_a10_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A design team needs to justify why one pathway or structure is less costly, more stable, or more coherent than alternatives. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A design team needs to justify why one pathway or structure is less costly, more stable, or more coherent than alternatives."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Factorial Design", "one_liner": "Multiple variables tested together.", "page_ref": "prime:factorial_design", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "The condition's entities occupy the prime's required roles.", "slug": "factorial_design", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime necessarily entails this condition."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A design team needs to justify why one pathway or structure is less costly, more stable, or more coherent than alternatives.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The problem can be parameterized into admissible alternatives that can be varied, perturbed, or compared.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The problem can be parameterized into admissible alternatives that can be varied, perturbed, or compared. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The problem can be parameterized into admissible alternatives that can be varied, perturbed, or compared."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The problem can be parameterized into admissible alternatives that can be varied, perturbed, or compared."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 71, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-071", "ledger_sha256": "a4461d6ced15792a6105829117926004dee9480de6f2507ef03d1ef5735f1fc2"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Versioned Evolution", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:versioned_evolution", "slug": "versioned_evolution"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is undocumented drift. The system changes, but the change is not made into a stable object of reasoning. Names stay the same while meanings, behavior, data, rules, or obligations change underneath. As a result, current authority becomes ambiguous, old results become unreproducible, compatibility breaks unexpectedly, and audit trails depend on memory.\n\nThe deeper tension is that change and continuity both matter. Without change, systems stagnate. Without stable reference points, change destroys comparability and accountability. Versioned Evolution resolves this tension by turning successive states into an ordered, interpretable lineage.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system or artifact evolves, but changes are not tracked clearly enough to compare versions, reproduce past results, audit decisions, maintain compatibility, migrate dependents, or reverse harmful change."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime necessarily entails this condition.", "role_mapping": "The condition's entities occupy the prime's required roles.", "slug": "versioning", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b071_a11_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when the same thing changes over time and those changes matter for action. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: the same artifact, rule, model, dataset, workflow, or interface changes over time.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["the same artifact, rule, model, dataset, workflow, or interface changes over time", "Use this archetype when the same thing changes over time and those changes matter for action."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Versioning", "one_liner": "Tracks incremental changes over time.", "page_ref": "prime:versioning", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "The condition's entities occupy the prime's required roles.", "slug": "versioning", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime necessarily entails this condition."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "the same artifact, rule, model, dataset, workflow, or interface changes over time", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate does not entail the complete condition in every instance.", "slug": "learning_substrate_contamination"}], "residual_id": "r:versioned_evolution:b071_a11_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b071_a11_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when multiple parties rely on a changing system at different times. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: different actors may rely on different versions without realizing it.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["different actors may rely on different versions without realizing it", "It is especially useful when multiple parties rely on a changing system at different times."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate does not entail the complete condition in every instance.", "slug": "learning_substrate_contamination"}], "normalized_requirement": "different actors may rely on different versions without realizing it", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "different actors may rely on different versions without realizing it", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate does not entail the complete condition in every instance.", "slug": "traceability"}], "residual_id": "r:versioned_evolution:b071_a11_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b071_a11_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system or artifact evolves, but changes are not tracked clearly enough to compare versions, reproduce past results, audit decisions, maintain compatibility, migrate dependents, or reverse harmful change. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: past versions need to remain interpretable for audit, learning, legality, safety, or reproducibility.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["past versions need to remain interpretable for audit, learning, legality, safety, or reproducibility", "A system or artifact evolves, but changes are not tracked clearly enough to compare versions, reproduce past results, audit decisions, maintain compatibility, migrate dependents, or reverse harmful change."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate does not entail the complete condition in every instance.", "slug": "traceability"}], "normalized_requirement": "past versions need to remain interpretable for audit, learning, legality, safety, or reproducibility", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "past versions need to remain interpretable for audit, learning, legality, safety, or reproducibility", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate does not entail the complete condition in every instance.", "slug": "design_for_lifecycle_adaptability"}], "residual_id": "r:versioned_evolution:b071_a11_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b071_a11_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Versioned evolution is warranted when the version record changes decisions: what users adopt, what auditors inspect, what researchers reproduce, what obligations apply, or what can safely interact. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: dependencies or users need to know whether a change is compatible with their current state.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["dependencies or users need to know whether a change is compatible with their current state", "Versioned evolution is warranted when the version record changes decisions: what users adopt, what auditors inspect, what researchers reproduce, what obligations apply, or what can safely interact."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate does not entail the complete condition in every instance.", "slug": "design_for_lifecycle_adaptability"}], "normalized_requirement": "dependencies or users need to know whether a change is compatible with their current state", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "dependencies or users need to know whether a change is compatible with their current state", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime necessarily entails this condition.", "role_mapping": "The condition's entities occupy the prime's required roles.", "slug": "versioning", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b071_a11_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "As a result, current authority becomes ambiguous, old results become unreproducible, compatibility breaks unexpectedly, and audit trails depend on memory. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: the organization needs to distinguish current authority from historical record.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["the organization needs to distinguish current authority from historical record", "As a result, current authority becomes ambiguous, old results become unreproducible, compatibility breaks unexpectedly, and audit trails depend on memory."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Versioning", "one_liner": "Tracks incremental changes over time.", "page_ref": "prime:versioning", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "The condition's entities occupy the prime's required roles.", "slug": "versioning", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime necessarily entails this condition."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "the organization needs to distinguish current authority from historical record", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "migration, deprecation, rollback, or comparison decisions depend on knowing what changed.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Versioned evolution is warranted when the version record changes decisions: what users adopt, what auditors inspect, what researchers reproduce, what obligations apply, or what can safely interact. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: migration, deprecation, rollback, or comparison decisions depend on knowing what changed. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["migration, deprecation, rollback, or comparison decisions depend on knowing what changed", "Versioned evolution is warranted when the version record changes decisions: what users adopt, what auditors inspect, what researchers reproduce, what obligations apply, or what can safely interact."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "migration, deprecation, rollback, or comparison decisions depend on knowing what changed"}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 71, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-071", "ledger_sha256": "a4461d6ced15792a6105829117926004dee9480de6f2507ef03d1ef5735f1fc2"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Versioning and Quality Discrimination", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:versioning_and_quality_discrimination", "slug": "versioning_and_quality_discrimination"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 5, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A seller, platform, institution, or service provider faces heterogeneous willingness-to-pay but cannot perfectly observe buyer type or does not want to assign people explicitly to different prices. A single uniform price either leaves high-willingness value uncaptured, excludes lower-willingness buyers, or forces a poor compromise between access and revenue. Direct segmentation may be costly, discriminatory, privacy-invasive, legally constrained, or easy to misclassify.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A seller, platform, institution, or service provider faces heterogeneous willingness-to-pay but cannot perfectly observe buyer type or does not want to assign people explicitly to different prices. A single uniform price either leaves high-willingness value uncaptured, excludes lower-willingness buyers, or forces a poor compromise between access and revenue. Direct segmentation may be costly, discriminatory, privacy-invasive, legally constrained, or easy to misclassify."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime necessarily entails this condition.", "role_mapping": "The condition's entities occupy the prime's required roles.", "slug": "price_discrimination", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b071_a12_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A single uniform price either leaves high-willingness value uncaptured, excludes lower-willingness buyers, or forces a poor compromise between access and revenue. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Buyers differ substantially in willingness-to-pay, urgency, need for support, flexibility, capacity, or convenience.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Buyers differ substantially in willingness-to-pay, urgency, need for support, flexibility, capacity, or convenience.", "A single uniform price either leaves high-willingness value uncaptured, excludes lower-willingness buyers, or forces a poor compromise between access and revenue."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Price Discrimination", "one_liner": "Variable pricing.", "page_ref": "prime:price_discrimination", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "The condition's entities occupy the prime's required roles.", "slug": "price_discrimination", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime necessarily entails this condition."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Buyers differ substantially in willingness-to-pay, urgency, need for support, flexibility, capacity, or convenience.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime necessarily entails this condition.", "role_mapping": "The condition's entities occupy the prime's required roles.", "slug": "price_discrimination", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b071_a12_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The offer can be decomposed into quality, timing, feature, access, service, or restriction dimensions. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The offer can be decomposed into quality, timing, feature, access, service, or restriction dimensions."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Price Discrimination", "one_liner": "Variable pricing.", "page_ref": "prime:price_discrimination", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "The condition's entities occupy the prime's required roles.", "slug": "price_discrimination", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime necessarily entails this condition."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The offer can be decomposed into quality, timing, feature, access, service, or restriction dimensions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime necessarily entails this condition.", "role_mapping": "The condition's entities occupy the prime's required roles.", "slug": "price_discrimination", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b071_a12_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A single uniform price either leaves high-willingness value uncaptured, excludes lower-willingness buyers, or forces a poor compromise between access and revenue. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Explicit price discrimination by buyer identity would be inappropriate, infeasible, or easy to game.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Explicit price discrimination by buyer identity would be inappropriate, infeasible, or easy to game.", "A single uniform price either leaves high-willingness value uncaptured, excludes lower-willingness buyers, or forces a poor compromise between access and revenue."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Price Discrimination", "one_liner": "Variable pricing.", "page_ref": "prime:price_discrimination", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "The condition's entities occupy the prime's required roles.", "slug": "price_discrimination", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime necessarily entails this condition."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Explicit price discrimination by buyer identity would be inappropriate, infeasible, or easy to game.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime necessarily entails this condition.", "role_mapping": "The condition's entities occupy the prime's required roles.", "slug": "price_discrimination", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b071_a12_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The provider can enforce tier boundaries without excessive friction or unfair denial of essential functionality. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The provider can enforce tier boundaries without excessive friction or unfair denial of essential functionality."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Price Discrimination", "one_liner": "Variable pricing.", "page_ref": "prime:price_discrimination", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "The condition's entities occupy the prime's required roles.", "slug": "price_discrimination", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime necessarily entails this condition."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The provider can enforce tier boundaries without excessive friction or unfair denial of essential functionality.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime necessarily entails this condition.", "role_mapping": "The condition's entities occupy the prime's required roles.", "slug": "price_discrimination", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b071_a12_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A single uniform price either leaves high-willingness value uncaptured, excludes lower-willingness buyers, or forces a poor compromise between access and revenue. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Different buyer groups value different nonprice attributes more than they value the nominal product itself.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Different buyer groups value different nonprice attributes more than they value the nominal product itself.", "A single uniform price either leaves high-willingness value uncaptured, excludes lower-willingness buyers, or forces a poor compromise between access and revenue."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Price Discrimination", "one_liner": "Variable pricing.", "page_ref": "prime:price_discrimination", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "The condition's entities occupy the prime's required roles.", "slug": "price_discrimination", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime necessarily entails this condition."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Different buyer groups value different nonprice attributes more than they value the nominal product itself.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Uniform pricing either excludes many buyers or underprices the offer for high-value use cases.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A single uniform price either leaves high-willingness value uncaptured, excludes lower-willingness buyers, or forces a poor compromise between access and revenue. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Uniform pricing either excludes many buyers or underprices the offer for high-value use cases. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Uniform pricing either excludes many buyers or underprices the offer for high-value use cases.", "A single uniform price either leaves high-willingness value uncaptured, excludes lower-willingness buyers, or forces a poor compromise between access and revenue."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Uniform pricing either excludes many buyers or underprices the offer for high-value use cases."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 71, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-071", "ledger_sha256": "a4461d6ced15792a6105829117926004dee9480de6f2507ef03d1ef5735f1fc2"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Viewer Participation and Embodied Interpretation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:viewer_participation_and_embodied_interpretation", "slug": "viewer_participation_and_embodied_interpretation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 5, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "An abstract concept, emotion, relation, or process must be communicated, but passive display leaves the viewer detached, misreads the work as decorative, or fails to convey scale, temporality, contingency, tension, or relational structure. The work needs the viewer’s embodied action to expose the abstraction, yet unconstrained participation can produce noise, safety risks, accessibility barriers, or gimmicky interaction that overwhelms the meaning.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "An abstract concept, emotion, relation, or process must be communicated, but passive display leaves the viewer detached, misreads the work as decorative, or fails to convey scale, temporality, contingency, tension, or relational structure. The work needs the viewer’s embodied action to expose the abstraction, yet unconstrained participation can produce noise, safety risks, accessibility barriers, or gimmicky interaction that overwhelms the meaning."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate does not entail the complete condition in every instance.", "slug": "interpretation"}], "residual_id": "r:viewer_participation_and_embodied_interpretation:b071_a13_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b071_a13_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The viewer must be active enough that bodily engagement produces meaning, but not so unconstrained that the work becomes arbitrary play, spectacle, unsafe action, inaccessible performance, or social pressure. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The intended meaning depends on movement, changing vantage point, bodily scale, timing, effort, resistance, or proximity.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The intended meaning depends on movement, changing vantage point, bodily scale, timing, effort, resistance, or proximity.", "The viewer must be active enough that bodily engagement produces meaning, but not so unconstrained that the work becomes arbitrary play, spectacle, unsafe action, inaccessible performance, or social pressure."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate does not entail the complete condition in every instance.", "slug": "interpretation"}], "normalized_requirement": "The intended meaning depends on movement, changing vantage point, bodily scale, timing, effort, resistance, or proximity.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The intended meaning depends on movement, changing vantage point, bodily scale, timing, effort, resistance, or proximity.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate does not entail the complete condition in every instance.", "slug": "gestalt_principles"}], "residual_id": "r:viewer_participation_and_embodied_interpretation:b071_a13_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b071_a13_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The work needs the viewer’s embodied action to expose the abstraction, yet unconstrained participation can produce noise, safety risks, accessibility barriers, or gimmicky interaction that overwhelms the meaning. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The viewer must complete, assemble, trigger, reveal, or co-produce the perceptual field.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The viewer must complete, assemble, trigger, reveal, or co-produce the perceptual field.", "The work needs the viewer’s embodied action to expose the abstraction, yet unconstrained participation can produce noise, safety risks, accessibility barriers, or gimmicky interaction that overwhelms the meaning."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate does not entail the complete condition in every instance.", "slug": "gestalt_principles"}], "normalized_requirement": "The viewer must complete, assemble, trigger, reveal, or co-produce the perceptual field.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The viewer must complete, assemble, trigger, reveal, or co-produce the perceptual field.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate does not entail the complete condition in every instance.", "slug": "abstraction"}], "residual_id": "r:viewer_participation_and_embodied_interpretation:b071_a13_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b071_a13_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "An abstract concept, emotion, relation, or process must be communicated, but passive display leaves the viewer detached, misreads the work as decorative, or fails to convey scale, temporality, contingency, tension, or relational structure. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The abstraction represents a process, tension, constraint, threshold, or transformation rather than a static object.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The abstraction represents a process, tension, constraint, threshold, or transformation rather than a static object.", "An abstract concept, emotion, relation, or process must be communicated, but passive display leaves the viewer detached, misreads the work as decorative, or fails to convey scale, temporality, contingency, tension, or relational structure."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate does not entail the complete condition in every instance.", "slug": "abstraction"}], "normalized_requirement": "The abstraction represents a process, tension, constraint, threshold, or transformation rather than a static object.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The abstraction represents a process, tension, constraint, threshold, or transformation rather than a static object.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate does not entail the complete condition in every instance.", "slug": "revisionism"}], "residual_id": "r:viewer_participation_and_embodied_interpretation:b071_a13_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b071_a13_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A single viewpoint produces a misleading or impoverished interpretation. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A single viewpoint produces a misleading or impoverished interpretation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate does not entail the complete condition in every instance.", "slug": "revisionism"}], "normalized_requirement": "A single viewpoint produces a misleading or impoverished interpretation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A single viewpoint produces a misleading or impoverished interpretation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate does not entail the complete condition in every instance.", "slug": "metaphor_visual_artistic"}], "residual_id": "r:viewer_participation_and_embodied_interpretation:b071_a13_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b071_a13_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The work needs the viewer’s embodied action to expose the abstraction, yet unconstrained participation can produce noise, safety risks, accessibility barriers, or gimmicky interaction that overwhelms the meaning. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Interaction has been added for engagement but does not change meaning.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Interaction has been added for engagement but does not change meaning.", "The work needs the viewer’s embodied action to expose the abstraction, yet unconstrained participation can produce noise, safety risks, accessibility barriers, or gimmicky interaction that overwhelms the meaning."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate does not entail the complete condition in every instance.", "slug": "metaphor_visual_artistic"}], "normalized_requirement": "Interaction has been added for engagement but does not change meaning.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Interaction has been added for engagement but does not change meaning.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Audience agency, consent, accessibility, or safety materially shapes whether the work can be experienced.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The work needs the viewer’s embodied action to expose the abstraction, yet unconstrained participation can produce noise, safety risks, accessibility barriers, or gimmicky interaction that overwhelms the meaning. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Audience agency, consent, accessibility, or safety materially shapes whether the work can be experienced. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Audience agency, consent, accessibility, or safety materially shapes whether the work can be experienced.", "The work needs the viewer’s embodied action to expose the abstraction, yet unconstrained participation can produce noise, safety risks, accessibility barriers, or gimmicky interaction that overwhelms the meaning."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Audience agency, consent, accessibility, or safety materially shapes whether the work can be experienced."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 71, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-071", "ledger_sha256": "a4461d6ced15792a6105829117926004dee9480de6f2507ef03d1ef5735f1fc2"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Virtual Resource Abstraction", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:virtual_resource_abstraction", "slug": "virtual_resource_abstraction"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 6, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 6, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "6 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is tight coupling between resource consumers and physical substrate. A user, process, team, or institution must reason about physical location, configuration, ownership, scarcity, topology, failure modes, or scheduling before it can use the resource.\n\nThis coupling causes avoidable friction. Resources may sit idle in one place while demand accumulates elsewhere. Work may become hard to migrate because resource identity is tied to a particular host, device, facility, or provider. Multiple consumers may interfere with each other because they share substrate without a real logical boundary. Operators may spend more effort explaining and repairing physical details than improving the resource contract.\n\nVirtual Resource Abstraction changes that structure by inserting a logical resource layer between consumer and substrate.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Users or systems are coupled directly to physical resources whose location, configuration, scarcity, ownership, failure modes, or topology constrain use and make sharing, replacement, portability, or safe multi-tenant allocation difficult."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime necessarily entails this condition.", "role_mapping": "The condition's entities occupy the prime's required roles.", "slug": "virtualization", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b071_a14_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Users or systems are coupled directly to physical resources whose location, configuration, scarcity, ownership, failure modes, or topology constrain use and make sharing, replacement, portability, or safe multi-tenant allocation difficult. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Multiple users, tenants, workloads, teams, or processes need to share the same underlying resource without directly coordinating every physical detail.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Multiple users, tenants, workloads, teams, or processes need to share the same underlying resource without directly coordinating every physical detail.", "Users or systems are coupled directly to physical resources whose location, configuration, scarcity, ownership, failure modes, or topology constrain use and make sharing, replacement, portability, or safe multi-tenant allocation difficult."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Virtualization", "one_liner": "Abstracts physical resources.", "page_ref": "prime:virtualization", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "The condition's entities occupy the prime's required roles.", "slug": "virtualization", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime necessarily entails this condition."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Multiple users, tenants, workloads, teams, or processes need to share the same underlying resource without directly coordinating every physical detail.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime necessarily entails this condition.", "role_mapping": "The condition's entities occupy the prime's required roles.", "slug": "virtualization", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b071_a14_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Work may become hard to migrate because resource identity is tied to a particular host, device, facility, or provider. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Resource use must become portable across hosts, providers, devices, locations, facilities, versions, or configurations.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Resource use must become portable across hosts, providers, devices, locations, facilities, versions, or configurations.", "Work may become hard to migrate because resource identity is tied to a particular host, device, facility, or provider."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Virtualization", "one_liner": "Abstracts physical resources.", "page_ref": "prime:virtualization", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "The condition's entities occupy the prime's required roles.", "slug": "virtualization", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime necessarily entails this condition."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Resource use must become portable across hosts, providers, devices, locations, facilities, versions, or configurations.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime necessarily entails this condition.", "role_mapping": "The condition's entities occupy the prime's required roles.", "slug": "virtualization", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b071_a14_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The pattern is especially useful when resources need to be shared, moved, resized, replaced, isolated, scheduled, metered, or accessed remotely without forcing every consumer to manage substrate details. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A scarce or costly physical resource should be exposed as logical capacity that can be allocated, reclaimed, metered, scheduled, or resized under policy.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A scarce or costly physical resource should be exposed as logical capacity that can be allocated, reclaimed, metered, scheduled, or resized under policy.", "The pattern is especially useful when resources need to be shared, moved, resized, replaced, isolated, scheduled, metered, or accessed remotely without forcing every consumer to manage substrate details."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Virtualization", "one_liner": "Abstracts physical resources.", "page_ref": "prime:virtualization", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "The condition's entities occupy the prime's required roles.", "slug": "virtualization", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime necessarily entails this condition."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A scarce or costly physical resource should be exposed as logical capacity that can be allocated, reclaimed, metered, scheduled, or resized under policy.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime necessarily entails this condition.", "role_mapping": "The condition's entities occupy the prime's required roles.", "slug": "virtualization", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b071_a14_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The system needs users to consume resources as if they were simple, stable, and separable, while the actual substrate is finite, situated, shared, heterogeneous, failure-prone, and expensive to manage. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Users need stable operations even while the backing substrate is replaced, migrated, repaired, scaled, replicated, or reconfigured.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Users need stable operations even while the backing substrate is replaced, migrated, repaired, scaled, replicated, or reconfigured.", "The system needs users to consume resources as if they were simple, stable, and separable, while the actual substrate is finite, situated, shared, heterogeneous, failure-prone, and expensive to manage."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Virtualization", "one_liner": "Abstracts physical resources.", "page_ref": "prime:virtualization", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "The condition's entities occupy the prime's required roles.", "slug": "virtualization", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime necessarily entails this condition."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Users need stable operations even while the backing substrate is replaced, migrated, repaired, scaled, replicated, or reconfigured.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime necessarily entails this condition.", "role_mapping": "The condition's entities occupy the prime's required roles.", "slug": "virtualization", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b071_a14_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when direct dependence on a specific physical resource is the source of rigidity. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Direct physical access creates too much coupling, safety risk, coordination overhead, vendor dependence, or operational fragility.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Direct physical access creates too much coupling, safety risk, coordination overhead, vendor dependence, or operational fragility.", "Use this archetype when direct dependence on a specific physical resource is the source of rigidity."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Virtualization", "one_liner": "Abstracts physical resources.", "page_ref": "prime:virtualization", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "The condition's entities occupy the prime's required roles.", "slug": "virtualization", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime necessarily entails this condition."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Direct physical access creates too much coupling, safety risk, coordination overhead, vendor dependence, or operational fragility.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime necessarily entails this condition.", "role_mapping": "The condition's entities occupy the prime's required roles.", "slug": "virtualization", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b071_a14_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Virtual Resource Abstraction changes that structure by inserting a logical resource layer between consumer and substrate. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The domain can tolerate a controlled abstraction gap: the virtual resource need not expose every substrate feature, but it must preserve the properties that matter for use.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The domain can tolerate a controlled abstraction gap: the virtual resource need not expose every substrate feature, but it must preserve the properties that matter for use.", "Virtual Resource Abstraction changes that structure by inserting a logical resource layer between consumer and substrate."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Virtualization", "one_liner": "Abstracts physical resources.", "page_ref": "prime:virtualization", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "The condition's entities occupy the prime's required roles.", "slug": "virtualization", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime necessarily entails this condition."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The domain can tolerate a controlled abstraction gap: the virtual resource need not expose every substrate feature, but it must preserve the properties that matter for use.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 71, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-071", "ledger_sha256": "a4461d6ced15792a6105829117926004dee9480de6f2507ef03d1ef5735f1fc2"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Virtue Cultivation Design", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:virtue_cultivation_design", "slug": "virtue_cultivation_design"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is a gap between compliance and character-in-action. A system may have rules, values, and training, but people still fail to enact the desired disposition when circumstances become difficult. They may know the right words but not have practiced the judgment, courage, care, or humility needed to act in context.\n\nThis gap often comes from environmental contradiction. The stated virtue says one thing, while role models, incentives, promotion criteria, time pressure, and informal norms teach another. In that case, the problem is not individual moral deficiency; it is a practice environment that is cultivating the wrong habit.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system obtains surface compliance with rules, procedures, or values language but does not cultivate the durable dispositions and practical judgment needed for wise action in ambiguous, pressured, or novel situations."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime necessarily entails this condition.", "role_mapping": "The condition's entities occupy the prime's required roles.", "slug": "virtue_ethics", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b071_a15_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system may have rules, values, and training, but people still fail to enact the desired disposition when circumstances become difficult. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: People follow rules when observed but abandon the underlying value when the case becomes ambiguous.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["People follow rules when observed but abandon the underlying value when the case becomes ambiguous.", "A system may have rules, values, and training, but people still fail to enact the desired disposition when circumstances become difficult."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Virtue Ethics", "one_liner": "Focus on character traits.", "page_ref": "prime:virtue_ethics", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "The condition's entities occupy the prime's required roles.", "slug": "virtue_ethics", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime necessarily entails this condition."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "People follow rules when observed but abandon the underlying value when the case becomes ambiguous.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime necessarily entails this condition.", "role_mapping": "The condition's entities occupy the prime's required roles.", "slug": "virtue_ethics", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b071_a15_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "They may know the right words but not have practiced the judgment, courage, care, or humility needed to act in context. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A value such as honesty, care, courage, humility, fairness, or stewardship is named as important but not practiced repeatedly.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A value such as honesty, care, courage, humility, fairness, or stewardship is named as important but not practiced repeatedly.", "They may know the right words but not have practiced the judgment, courage, care, or humility needed to act in context."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Virtue Ethics", "one_liner": "Focus on character traits.", "page_ref": "prime:virtue_ethics", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "The condition's entities occupy the prime's required roles.", "slug": "virtue_ethics", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime necessarily entails this condition."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A value such as honesty, care, courage, humility, fairness, or stewardship is named as important but not practiced repeatedly.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate does not entail the complete condition in every instance.", "slug": "transfer_of_learning"}], "residual_id": "r:virtue_cultivation_design:b071_a15_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b071_a15_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system may have rules, values, and training, but people still fail to enact the desired disposition when circumstances become difficult. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Training transfers information but leaves people unsure how to judge tradeoffs in concrete cases.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Training transfers information but leaves people unsure how to judge tradeoffs in concrete cases.", "A system may have rules, values, and training, but people still fail to enact the desired disposition when circumstances become difficult."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate does not entail the complete condition in every instance.", "slug": "transfer_of_learning"}], "normalized_requirement": "Training transfers information but leaves people unsure how to judge tradeoffs in concrete cases.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Training transfers information but leaves people unsure how to judge tradeoffs in concrete cases.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate does not entail the complete condition in every instance.", "slug": "enculturation"}], "residual_id": "r:virtue_cultivation_design:b071_a15_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b071_a15_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The stated virtue says one thing, while role models, incentives, promotion criteria, time pressure, and informal norms teach another. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The formal policy rewards one behavior while informal culture teaches another.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The formal policy rewards one behavior while informal culture teaches another.", "The stated virtue says one thing, while role models, incentives, promotion criteria, time pressure, and informal norms teach another."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate does not entail the complete condition in every instance.", "slug": "enculturation"}], "normalized_requirement": "The formal policy rewards one behavior while informal culture teaches another.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The formal policy rewards one behavior while informal culture teaches another.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "An organization wants culture change but treats it as messaging rather than habit formation.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It fits professional training, leadership development, safety culture, education, governance, and organizational change. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: An organization wants culture change but treats it as messaging rather than habit formation. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["An organization wants culture change but treats it as messaging rather than habit formation.", "It fits professional training, leadership development, safety culture, education, governance, and organizational change."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "An organization wants culture change but treats it as messaging rather than habit formation."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 71, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-071", "ledger_sha256": "a4461d6ced15792a6105829117926004dee9480de6f2507ef03d1ef5735f1fc2"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Visual Balance Calibration", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:visual_balance_calibration", "slug": "visual_balance_calibration"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 1 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 1}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Visual systems distribute attention and anchoring force unevenly. Designers often rely on bounding boxes, equal columns, or centered coordinates, but perception weights objects by contrast, saturation, density, texture, position, direction, imagery, semantic importance, and the shapes of empty regions. A layout can be mathematically equal and still appear to fall to one side.\nFamiliarity compounds the problem. After prolonged editing, designers adapt to imbalance and judge local details instead of the whole field. Responsive formats create new frames in which old compensation no longer works. Without an explicit balance intent and validation methods, corrections become unexplained nudges that are fragile under later change.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Perceptual weight is uneven across a visual field even when geometric coordinates or bounding boxes appear balanced."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Removing any literal admits a counterexample missing a load-bearing part of this diagnostic route.", "sufficiency_argument": "This branch preserves the complete remedy-free diagnostic route; goals, feasibility clauses, gates, deployment constraints, and supporting context remain outside the DNF."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [{"case_id": "EXT001-C095", "dnf": [["EXT001-U095-O1"]], "enumeration_semantics": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "live_residual": true, "obligations": [{"obligation_id": "EXT001-U095-O1", "predicate": "A visual field appears unintentionally weighted or unstable despite nominal geometric alignment."}], "predicate": "A visual field appears unintentionally weighted or unstable despite nominal geometric alignment.", "resolution": "UNRESOLVED", "semantic_scope": "ELIGIBLE_RELATIONAL", "structural_head": "A visual field appears unintentionally weighted or unstable despite nominal geometric alignment.", "unit_id": "EXT001-U095"}], "prime_relink_representation": {"catalog_exhaustion": "CONDITION_LEVEL", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: A visual field appears unintentionally weighted or unstable despite nominal geometric alignment.", "slug": "composition"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: A visual field appears unintentionally weighted or unstable despite nominal geometric alignment.", "slug": "perspective"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: A visual field appears unintentionally weighted or unstable despite nominal geometric alignment.", "slug": "fallacy_of_misplaced_concreteness"}], "residual_id": "EXT001:visual_balance_calibration:C01", "residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding."}}, "condition_id": "ext001_visual_balance_calibration_a01", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored structural_problem, prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified. In this condition set, the requirement is: A visual field appears unintentionally weighted or unstable despite nominal geometric alignment.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A visual field appears unintentionally weighted or unstable despite nominal geometric alignment."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 1, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "REVIEWED", "unresolved_units": 1}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: A visual field appears unintentionally weighted or unstable despite nominal geometric alignment.", "slug": "composition"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: A visual field appears unintentionally weighted or unstable despite nominal geometric alignment.", "slug": "perspective"}, {"falls_short_because": "A complete exact-record instance can exist while the following atom is false: A visual field appears unintentionally weighted or unstable despite nominal geometric alignment.", "slug": "fallacy_of_misplaced_concreteness"}], "normalized_requirement": "A visual field appears unintentionally weighted or unstable despite nominal geometric alignment.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "DOMAIN_SPECIFIC", "research_disposition": "EXISTING_DSA_SHORTLIST_OPEN", "why_open": "No prime on the frozen top-15 condition shortlist survived the exact-record forward-necessity test. This is a strong rejection of the reviewed candidates, not a claim that the complete catalog lacks a possible grounding. Later DSA reconciliation reviewed 1 eligible atomic unit or units, but no candidate from the frozen shortlist survived the necessity test."}, "predicate": "A visual field appears unintentionally weighted or unstable despite nominal geometric alignment.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Contrast, saturation, density, texture, position, direction, imagery, semantics, or negative space contributes unequal perceptual weight.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored structural_problem, prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Contrast, saturation, density, texture, position, direction, imagery, semantics, or negative space contributes unequal perceptual weight. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Contrast, saturation, density, texture, position, direction, imagery, semantics, or negative space contributes unequal perceptual weight.", "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored structural_problem, prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 2, "text": "Contrast, saturation, density, texture, position, direction, imagery, semantics, or negative space contributes unequal perceptual weight."}, {"display_text": "Balance can be evaluated across the relevant responsive frames.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored structural_problem, prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified. In this archetype, the relevant feasibility condition is: Balance can be evaluated across the relevant responsive frames. It identifies something that must be possible or available for the intervention to be workable.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Balance can be evaluated across the relevant responsive frames.", "This proposition-sized condition was conservatively reconstructed from the authored structural_problem, prose_structural_problem, prose_when_to_use fields; the source file was not modified."]}, "function": "SOLUTION_FEASIBILITY", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it describes whether the intervention can work, not whether the diagnostic problem exists.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "Balance can be evaluated across the relevant responsive frames."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"candidate_ledger_sha256": "96f72d2139077fd57bf795048ebef33b3fd574b20963170080ec916b5b3b92fe", "extension_id": "new-archetypes-extension-001", "ledger_id": "prime-production-v1.2-extension-001", "ledger_sha256": "9644520614744632d1d36da44b1acd77ce432852c6083eb871203521c166efce"}, "base_projection_sha256": "841e0c7f3cb8e8054475ad29a8a14745a416b4fc115559a44878b94292e673ec", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "ca09ed9fe1598ce7072755b530de5553f5ee0a7cd64ae82d9e4a4e2149a37788", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Visual Flow Guidance", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:visual_flow_guidance", "slug": "visual_flow_guidance"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is path ambiguity. The audience encounters a field with multiple possible entry points and multiple possible routes. The designer may have an intended sequence, but the visible or spatial structure does not make that sequence obvious. As a result, people assemble meaning from whichever path happens to win the competition for attention.\n\nCommon symptoms include inconsistent first looks, skipped warnings or prerequisites, backtracking, hesitation, accidental emphasis, and reliance on verbal explanation to repair a path that should have been perceptually legible.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "The relevant elements are present, but the audience does not know where to begin, where to look next, or how to move from one element to another. Sequence, navigation, or interpretive order is left to accident, so people skip prerequisites, follow false paths, or assemble meaning in the wrong order."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate.", "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "movement_visual_movement", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b072_a01_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The audience encounters a field with multiple possible entry points and multiple possible routes. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A display, space, explanation, interface, or route contains multiple plausible starting points and no reliable first cue.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A display, space, explanation, interface, or route contains multiple plausible starting points and no reliable first cue.", "The audience encounters a field with multiple possible entry points and multiple possible routes."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Movement (Visual Movement)", "one_liner": "Guides viewer’s eye.", "page_ref": "prime:movement_visual_movement", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "movement_visual_movement", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A display, space, explanation, interface, or route contains multiple plausible starting points and no reliable first cue.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate.", "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "movement_visual_movement", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b072_a01_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Understanding depends on encountering elements in a particular order, but the order is not perceptually obvious. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Understanding depends on encountering elements in a particular order, but the order is not perceptually obvious."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Movement (Visual Movement)", "one_liner": "Guides viewer’s eye.", "page_ref": "prime:movement_visual_movement", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "movement_visual_movement", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Understanding depends on encountering elements in a particular order, but the order is not perceptually obvious.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate.", "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "movement_visual_movement", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b072_a01_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The relevant elements are present, but the audience does not know where to begin, where to look next, or how to move from one element to another. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Users or viewers wander, backtrack, hesitate, or ask what they should look at next.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Users or viewers wander, backtrack, hesitate, or ask what they should look at next.", "The relevant elements are present, but the audience does not know where to begin, where to look next, or how to move from one element to another."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Movement (Visual Movement)", "one_liner": "Guides viewer’s eye.", "page_ref": "prime:movement_visual_movement", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "movement_visual_movement", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Users or viewers wander, backtrack, hesitate, or ask what they should look at next.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate.", "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "movement_visual_movement", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b072_a01_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when sequence, route, or next-step orientation materially changes whether people understand what they are seeing or do the right thing with it. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A stronger accidental cue pulls attention away from the intended next step.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A stronger accidental cue pulls attention away from the intended next step.", "Use this archetype when sequence, route, or next-step orientation materially changes whether people understand what they are seeing or do the right thing with it."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Movement (Visual Movement)", "one_liner": "Guides viewer’s eye.", "page_ref": "prime:movement_visual_movement", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "movement_visual_movement", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A stronger accidental cue pulls attention away from the intended next step.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A visual or spatial field contains branches, loops, or optional details that need orientation support.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: A visual or spatial field contains branches, loops, or optional details that need orientation support. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A visual or spatial field contains branches, loops, or optional details that need orientation support."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "A visual or spatial field contains branches, loops, or optional details that need orientation support."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 72, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-072", "ledger_sha256": "b0fbd62541dabdc8d510d5ad32b1dc44f472acc608050dc54d42064e8c5d4f98"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Vulnerability Hotspot Mapping and Hardening", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:vulnerability_hotspot_mapping_and_hardening", "slug": "vulnerability_hotspot_mapping_and_hardening"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 5, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system contains places, populations, components, or subgroups whose risk is much higher than average because multiple vulnerabilities co-locate, but the concentration is hidden by separate metrics, broad averages, isolated owners, or post-hoc maps. Without hotspot reasoning, interventions are spread evenly, assigned to the wrong layer, or delayed until the cluster becomes an incident source.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system contains places, populations, components, or subgroups whose risk is much higher than average because multiple vulnerabilities co-locate, but the concentration is hidden by separate metrics, broad averages, isolated owners, or post-hoc maps. Without hotspot reasoning, interventions are spread evenly, assigned to the wrong layer, or delayed until the cluster becomes an incident source."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate.", "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "vulnerability_decomposition", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b072_a02_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The hotspot is defined by co-location, not by one high score alone. In this condition set, the requirement is: Several sensitivity, exposure, dependency, or capacity factors can apply to the same unit.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Several sensitivity, exposure, dependency, or capacity factors can apply to the same unit."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Vulnerability Decomposition", "one_liner": "A system's vulnerability to a named stressor factors into exposure, sensitivity, and adaptive capacity, each admitting its own intervention family.", "page_ref": "prime:vulnerability_decomposition", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "vulnerability_decomposition", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Several sensitivity, exposure, dependency, or capacity factors can apply to the same unit.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is adjacent but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "failure_mode_and_effects_analysis_fmea"}], "residual_id": "r:vulnerability_hotspot_mapping_and_hardening:b072_a02_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b072_a02_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The signal is lost when spatial, social, network, or component variation is collapsed. In this condition set, the requirement is: System averages look acceptable while some units repeatedly experience disproportionate harm, failure, load, or unmet need.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["System averages look acceptable while some units repeatedly experience disproportionate harm, failure, load, or unmet need."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is adjacent but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "failure_mode_and_effects_analysis_fmea"}], "normalized_requirement": "System averages look acceptable while some units repeatedly experience disproportionate harm, failure, load, or unmet need.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "System averages look acceptable while some units repeatedly experience disproportionate harm, failure, load, or unmet need.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate.", "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "vulnerability_decomposition", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b072_a02_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Fragmented ownership makes the intersection nobody's responsibility. In this condition set, the requirement is: Different teams own different layers of vulnerability.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Different teams own different layers of vulnerability."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Vulnerability Decomposition", "one_liner": "A system's vulnerability to a named stressor factors into exposure, sensitivity, and adaptive capacity, each admitting its own intervention family.", "page_ref": "prime:vulnerability_decomposition", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "vulnerability_decomposition", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Different teams own different layers of vulnerability.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate.", "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "vulnerability_decomposition", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b072_a02_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Dormant hotspots become visible too late if monitoring begins only after stress arrives. In this condition set, the requirement is: The risk may be activated only during a readiness window, demand spike, shock, attack, policy change, or environmental stressor.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The risk may be activated only during a readiness window, demand spike, shock, attack, policy change, or environmental stressor."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Vulnerability Decomposition", "one_liner": "A system's vulnerability to a named stressor factors into exposure, sensitivity, and adaptive capacity, each admitting its own intervention family.", "page_ref": "prime:vulnerability_decomposition", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "vulnerability_decomposition", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The risk may be activated only during a readiness window, demand spike, shock, attack, policy change, or environmental stressor.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate.", "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "vulnerability_decomposition", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b072_a02_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Local concentration can control global reliability or justice outcomes. In this condition set, the requirement is: A child single point of failure, bottleneck, high-exposure receptor, or low-capacity subgroup may dominate system risk.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A child single point of failure, bottleneck, high-exposure receptor, or low-capacity subgroup may dominate system risk."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Vulnerability Decomposition", "one_liner": "A system's vulnerability to a named stressor factors into exposure, sensitivity, and adaptive capacity, each admitting its own intervention family.", "page_ref": "prime:vulnerability_decomposition", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "vulnerability_decomposition", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A child single point of failure, bottleneck, high-exposure receptor, or low-capacity subgroup may dominate system risk.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate.", "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "vulnerability_decomposition", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b072_a02_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Equal allocation is not enough when vulnerability is concentrated. In this condition set, the requirement is: Treating units equally would preserve an unequal risk distribution.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Treating units equally would preserve an unequal risk distribution."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Vulnerability Decomposition", "one_liner": "A system's vulnerability to a named stressor factors into exposure, sensitivity, and adaptive capacity, each admitting its own intervention family.", "page_ref": "prime:vulnerability_decomposition", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "vulnerability_decomposition", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Treating units equally would preserve an unequal risk distribution.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Mapping or targeting is being used for prioritization.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The archetype adds validation against cherry-picked boundaries, multiple comparisons, and duplicated measures. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Mapping or targeting is being used for prioritization. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Mapping or targeting is being used for prioritization.", "The archetype adds validation against cherry-picked boundaries, multiple comparisons, and duplicated measures."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Mapping or targeting is being used for prioritization."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 72, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-072", "ledger_sha256": "b0fbd62541dabdc8d510d5ad32b1dc44f472acc608050dc54d42064e8c5d4f98"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Vulnerability Lever Partitioning", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:vulnerability_lever_partitioning", "slug": "vulnerability_lever_partitioning"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A hazard, stressor, or adverse driver is treated as creating a single undifferentiated vulnerability, causing interventions to miss the distinct causal roles of exposure, sensitivity, and adaptive capacity.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A hazard, stressor, or adverse driver is treated as creating a single undifferentiated vulnerability, causing interventions to miss the distinct causal roles of exposure, sensitivity, and adaptive capacity."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate.", "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "vulnerability_decomposition", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b072_a03_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A hazard, stressor, or adverse driver is treated as creating a single undifferentiated vulnerability, causing interventions to miss the distinct causal roles of exposure, sensitivity, and adaptive capacity. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A named stressor can harm different units, places, populations, assets, or functions by different causal paths.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A named stressor can harm different units, places, populations, assets, or functions by different causal paths.", "A hazard, stressor, or adverse driver is treated as creating a single undifferentiated vulnerability, causing interventions to miss the distinct causal roles of exposure, sensitivity, and adaptive capacity."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Vulnerability Decomposition", "one_liner": "A system's vulnerability to a named stressor factors into exposure, sensitivity, and adaptive capacity, each admitting its own intervention family.", "page_ref": "prime:vulnerability_decomposition", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "vulnerability_decomposition", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A named stressor can harm different units, places, populations, assets, or functions by different causal paths.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate.", "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "vulnerability_decomposition", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b072_a03_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A hazard, stressor, or adverse driver is treated as creating a single undifferentiated vulnerability, causing interventions to miss the distinct causal roles of exposure, sensitivity, and adaptive capacity. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Some units are harmed mainly because they are in the path of the stressor, while others are harmed because they are intrinsically fragile or lack response capacity.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Some units are harmed mainly because they are in the path of the stressor, while others are harmed because they are intrinsically fragile or lack response capacity.", "A hazard, stressor, or adverse driver is treated as creating a single undifferentiated vulnerability, causing interventions to miss the distinct causal roles of exposure, sensitivity, and adaptive capacity."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Vulnerability Decomposition", "one_liner": "A system's vulnerability to a named stressor factors into exposure, sensitivity, and adaptive capacity, each admitting its own intervention family.", "page_ref": "prime:vulnerability_decomposition", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "vulnerability_decomposition", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Some units are harmed mainly because they are in the path of the stressor, while others are harmed because they are intrinsically fragile or lack response capacity.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate.", "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "vulnerability_decomposition", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b072_a03_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Decision makers must choose among prevention, shielding, adaptation, relief, redundancy, risk transfer, relocation, or capacity-building options. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Decision makers must choose among prevention, shielding, adaptation, relief, redundancy, risk transfer, relocation, or capacity-building options."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Vulnerability Decomposition", "one_liner": "A system's vulnerability to a named stressor factors into exposure, sensitivity, and adaptive capacity, each admitting its own intervention family.", "page_ref": "prime:vulnerability_decomposition", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "vulnerability_decomposition", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Decision makers must choose among prevention, shielding, adaptation, relief, redundancy, risk transfer, relocation, or capacity-building options.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is adjacent but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "partition_dependence_of_aggregates"}], "residual_id": "r:vulnerability_lever_partitioning:b072_a03_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b072_a03_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Aggregate risk scores obscure which factor should receive intervention effort. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Aggregate risk scores obscure which factor should receive intervention effort."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is adjacent but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "partition_dependence_of_aggregates"}], "normalized_requirement": "Aggregate risk scores obscure which factor should receive intervention effort.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Aggregate risk scores obscure which factor should receive intervention effort.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is adjacent but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "sacrifice_periphery_to_defend_core"}], "residual_id": "r:vulnerability_lever_partitioning:b072_a03_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b072_a03_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Resources are scarce enough that “improve resilience everywhere” is too vague to guide allocation. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Resources are scarce enough that “improve resilience everywhere” is too vague to guide allocation."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is adjacent but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "sacrifice_periphery_to_defend_core"}], "normalized_requirement": "Resources are scarce enough that “improve resilience everywhere” is too vague to guide allocation.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Resources are scarce enough that “improve resilience everywhere” is too vague to guide allocation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Interventions on one factor can shift burden to another factor or group if the decomposition is not explicit.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Interventions on one factor can shift burden to another factor or group if the decomposition is not explicit. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Interventions on one factor can shift burden to another factor or group if the decomposition is not explicit."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Interventions on one factor can shift burden to another factor or group if the decomposition is not explicit."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 72, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-072", "ledger_sha256": "b0fbd62541dabdc8d510d5ad32b1dc44f472acc608050dc54d42064e8c5d4f98"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Warranted Belief Formation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:warranted_belief_formation", "slug": "warranted_belief_formation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 5, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "An agent or group must decide whether to hold a proposition as true enough to guide action, but the transition from exposure or interpretation to belief is often implicit. Without a designed formation process, belief can be produced by fluency, authority, group identity, fear, stereotypes, repetition, emotional salience, or premature coherence rather than by warrant appropriate to the stakes.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "An agent or group must decide whether to hold a proposition as true enough to guide action, but the transition from exposure or interpretation to belief is often implicit. Without a designed formation process, belief can be produced by fluency, authority, group identity, fear, stereotypes, repetition, emotional salience, or premature coherence rather than by warrant appropriate to the stakes."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate.", "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "belief_formation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b072_a04_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The claim may come from evidence review, education, testimony, AI output, narrative, expert authority, personal experience, or social consensus. In this condition set, the requirement is: A proposition, explanation, diagnosis, category judgment, forecast, or norm is moving from consideration into acceptance.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A proposition, explanation, diagnosis, category judgment, forecast, or norm is moving from consideration into acceptance."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Belief Formation", "one_liner": "Commitment-transition by which an agent comes to hold a proposition as true and act accordingly.", "page_ref": "prime:belief_formation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "belief_formation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A proposition, explanation, diagnosis, category judgment, forecast, or norm is moving from consideration into acceptance.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate.", "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "belief_formation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b072_a04_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The higher the consequences, the stronger the need for explicit warrant, confidence, scope, and revision conditions. In this condition set, the requirement is: The belief will affect decisions, resource allocation, identity, trust, risk tolerance, diagnosis, pedagogy, or treatment of other people.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The belief will affect decisions, resource allocation, identity, trust, risk tolerance, diagnosis, pedagogy, or treatment of other people."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Belief Formation", "one_liner": "Commitment-transition by which an agent comes to hold a proposition as true and act accordingly.", "page_ref": "prime:belief_formation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "belief_formation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The belief will affect decisions, resource allocation, identity, trust, risk tolerance, diagnosis, pedagogy, or treatment of other people.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate.", "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "belief_formation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b072_a04_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Evidence, coherence, social proof, repetition, identity fit, and emotional resonance may all pull the agent toward belief for different reasons. In this condition set, the requirement is: Multiple routes to acceptance compete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Multiple routes to acceptance compete."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Belief Formation", "one_liner": "Commitment-transition by which an agent comes to hold a proposition as true and act accordingly.", "page_ref": "prime:belief_formation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "belief_formation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Multiple routes to acceptance compete.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate.", "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "belief_formation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b072_a04_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The system needs usable intermediate states rather than a binary true/false adoption decision. In this condition set, the requirement is: The proposition is plausible but uncertain.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The proposition is plausible but uncertain."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Belief Formation", "one_liner": "Commitment-transition by which an agent comes to hold a proposition as true and act accordingly.", "page_ref": "prime:belief_formation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "belief_formation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The proposition is plausible but uncertain.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate.", "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "belief_formation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b072_a04_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The archetype is especially important when the proposition concerns people, groups, threats, public narratives, or contested evidence. In this condition set, the requirement is: Belief formation is vulnerable to bias, stigma, stereotype, manipulation, or motivated reasoning.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Belief formation is vulnerable to bias, stigma, stereotype, manipulation, or motivated reasoning."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Belief Formation", "one_liner": "Commitment-transition by which an agent comes to hold a proposition as true and act accordingly.", "page_ref": "prime:belief_formation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "belief_formation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Belief formation is vulnerable to bias, stigma, stereotype, manipulation, or motivated reasoning.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The learner or decision-maker must act before perfect proof is available.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The design must calibrate commitment to evidence strength and stakes rather than demanding impossible certainty. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The learner or decision-maker must act before perfect proof is available. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_TRIGGER_NOTE_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The learner or decision-maker must act before perfect proof is available.", "The design must calibrate commitment to evidence strength and stakes rather than demanding impossible certainty."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The learner or decision-maker must act before perfect proof is available."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 72, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-072", "ledger_sha256": "b0fbd62541dabdc8d510d5ad32b1dc44f472acc608050dc54d42064e8c5d4f98"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Wave Packet Propagation and Spreading", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:wave_packet_propagation_and_spreading", "slug": "wave_packet_propagation_and_spreading"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 6, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 6, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "6 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Decision-makers often collapse a moving packet into a single point: the first arrival, the center, the peak, or the destination. That simplification hides the packet’s envelope. The leading edge may arrive long before the main concentration. The tail may persist after the apparent peak has passed. The packet may spread, split, recombine, attenuate, or amplify as it crosses different parts of the medium.\n\nThe structural problem is therefore a representation problem and an intervention problem at the same time. Without a packet representation, interventions are mistimed or placed in the wrong part of the path. Without intervention logic, packet modeling becomes descriptive but not useful.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A localized signal, state, resource demand, pollutant, influence burst, or probability distribution is moving through a medium, but decision-makers are treating it as either a single point, a uniform diffusion process, or a front edge. That simplification hides broadening, dilution, fragmentation, delayed tails, boundary reflections, and changes in concentration that determine whether the packet is useful, risky, observable, or controllable."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate.", "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "propagation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b072_a05_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when the phenomenon has a bounded origin or pulse-like release, when both motion and broadening matter, and when the medium or network changes how the packet evolves. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A disturbance or signal starts from a bounded origin, interval, cluster, pulse, or release rather than being present everywhere at once.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A disturbance or signal starts from a bounded origin, interval, cluster, pulse, or release rather than being present everywhere at once.", "Use this archetype when the phenomenon has a bounded origin or pulse-like release, when both motion and broadening matter, and when the medium or network changes how the packet evolves."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Propagation", "one_liner": "The systematic spreading of a signal, effect, or state from a source through a medium or network, where the medium's structure governs how fast it moves, how it attenuates, and which paths it follows.", "page_ref": "prime:propagation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "propagation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A disturbance or signal starts from a bounded origin, interval, cluster, pulse, or release rather than being present everywhere at once.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate.", "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "propagation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b072_a05_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The packet can move while also widening, thinning, fragmenting, or losing coherence. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The packet can move while also widening, thinning, fragmenting, or losing coherence."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Propagation", "one_liner": "The systematic spreading of a signal, effect, or state from a source through a medium or network, where the medium's structure governs how fast it moves, how it attenuates, and which paths it follows.", "page_ref": "prime:propagation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "propagation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The packet can move while also widening, thinning, fragmenting, or losing coherence.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate.", "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "propagation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b072_a05_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The packet may spread, split, recombine, attenuate, or amplify as it crosses different parts of the medium. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The medium, network, route, field, or substrate changes how quickly different parts of the packet travel.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The medium, network, route, field, or substrate changes how quickly different parts of the packet travel.", "The packet may spread, split, recombine, attenuate, or amplify as it crosses different parts of the medium."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Propagation", "one_liner": "The systematic spreading of a signal, effect, or state from a source through a medium or network, where the medium's structure governs how fast it moves, how it attenuates, and which paths it follows.", "page_ref": "prime:propagation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "propagation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The medium, network, route, field, or substrate changes how quickly different parts of the packet travel.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate.", "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "propagation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b072_a05_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially relevant when decisions depend on concentration, exposure, coherence, arrival distribution, or tail behavior rather than on a simple yes/no arrival event. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Decisions depend on concentration, exposure, coherence, arrival distribution, or tail behavior rather than only on first arrival.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Decisions depend on concentration, exposure, coherence, arrival distribution, or tail behavior rather than only on first arrival.", "It is especially relevant when decisions depend on concentration, exposure, coherence, arrival distribution, or tail behavior rather than on a simple yes/no arrival event."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Propagation", "one_liner": "The systematic spreading of a signal, effect, or state from a source through a medium or network, where the medium's structure governs how fast it moves, how it attenuates, and which paths it follows.", "page_ref": "prime:propagation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "propagation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Decisions depend on concentration, exposure, coherence, arrival distribution, or tail behavior rather than only on first arrival.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate.", "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "propagation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b072_a05_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Decision-makers often collapse a moving packet into a single point: the first arrival, the center, the peak, or the destination. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Sampling at a single point or time risks missing the packet center, the leading edge, the trailing tail, or the broadening footprint.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Sampling at a single point or time risks missing the packet center, the leading edge, the trailing tail, or the broadening footprint.", "Decision-makers often collapse a moving packet into a single point: the first arrival, the center, the peak, or the destination."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Propagation", "one_liner": "The systematic spreading of a signal, effect, or state from a source through a medium or network, where the medium's structure governs how fast it moves, how it attenuates, and which paths it follows.", "page_ref": "prime:propagation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "propagation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Sampling at a single point or time risks missing the packet center, the leading edge, the trailing tail, or the broadening footprint.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate.", "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "propagation", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b072_a05_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when the phenomenon has a bounded origin or pulse-like release, when both motion and broadening matter, and when the medium or network changes how the packet evolves. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Interventions are possible before, during, or after propagation, such as damping zones, routing changes, refocusing, barriers, staged release, or additional measurement.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Interventions are possible before, during, or after propagation, such as damping zones, routing changes, refocusing, barriers, staged release, or additional measurement.", "Use this archetype when the phenomenon has a bounded origin or pulse-like release, when both motion and broadening matter, and when the medium or network changes how the packet evolves."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Propagation", "one_liner": "The systematic spreading of a signal, effect, or state from a source through a medium or network, where the medium's structure governs how fast it moves, how it attenuates, and which paths it follows.", "page_ref": "prime:propagation", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "propagation", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Interventions are possible before, during, or after propagation, such as damping zones, routing changes, refocusing, barriers, staged release, or additional measurement.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 72, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-072", "ledger_sha256": "b0fbd62541dabdc8d510d5ad32b1dc44f472acc608050dc54d42064e8c5d4f98"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Wavefront Propagation Management", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:wavefront_propagation_management", "slug": "wavefront_propagation_management"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is that many systems respond to spreading events with static categories. They focus on the origin, aggregate totals, broad geographic regions, or after-the-fact recovery. Those views can be useful, but they often miss the moving edge where intervention still has leverage.\n\nA front creates timing asymmetry. Ahead of it, preparation and prevention are still possible. At the edge, support, containment, correction, isolation, or seeding can influence what happens next. Behind it, the problem shifts to stabilization, recovery, consolidation, and prevention of secondary waves.\n\nWhen the front is not explicitly represented, teams repeatedly act late. Downstream sites are surprised. Barriers are placed after the wave has passed. Adoption support arrives after users have already failed. Corrections are sent after a rumor has already saturated a community. Cascading failures cross dependency boundaries before operators realize the edge has moved.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A disturbance, signal, behavior, adoption pattern, failure, or resource shock spreads through a medium or network over time, but the system responds as if the issue were only at the origin, everywhere at once, or already static. This causes late action, misallocated effort, missed preparation windows, avoidable downstream harm, or stalled beneficial spread."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate.", "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "wave", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b072_a06_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Do not use it for every spreading phenomenon. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A phenomenon is spreading rather than staying local.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A phenomenon is spreading rather than staying local.", "Do not use it for every spreading phenomenon."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Wave", "one_liner": "Propagating disturbance.", "page_ref": "prime:wave", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "wave", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A phenomenon is spreading rather than staying local.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is adjacent but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "operational_overextension"}], "residual_id": "r:wavefront_propagation_management:b072_a06_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b072_a06_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Those views can be useful, but they often miss the moving edge where intervention still has leverage. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The moving edge is observable enough to guide action.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The moving edge is observable enough to guide action.", "Those views can be useful, but they often miss the moving edge where intervention still has leverage."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is adjacent but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "operational_overextension"}], "normalized_requirement": "The moving edge is observable enough to guide action.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The moving edge is observable enough to guide action.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is adjacent but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "transient_response"}], "residual_id": "r:wavefront_propagation_management:b072_a06_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b072_a06_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "If the main problem is “stop harmful spread” and front timing is not the central design issue, use Diffusion Containment. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Timing at the front changes outcomes.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Timing at the front changes outcomes.", "If the main problem is “stop harmful spread” and front timing is not the central design issue, use Diffusion Containment."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is adjacent but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "transient_response"}], "normalized_requirement": "Timing at the front changes outcomes.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Timing at the front changes outcomes.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is adjacent but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "preparatory_field_conditioning"}], "residual_id": "r:wavefront_propagation_management:b072_a06_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b072_a06_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Downstream areas differ in vulnerability, readiness, or strategic value. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Downstream areas differ in vulnerability, readiness, or strategic value."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is adjacent but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "preparatory_field_conditioning"}], "normalized_requirement": "Downstream areas differ in vulnerability, readiness, or strategic value.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Downstream areas differ in vulnerability, readiness, or strategic value.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate.", "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "wave", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b072_a06_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The desired front behavior is explicit. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The desired front behavior is explicit."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Wave", "one_liner": "Propagating disturbance.", "page_ref": "prime:wave", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "wave", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The desired front behavior is explicit.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The front may change route or intensity after intervention.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The front may change route or intensity after intervention. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The front may change route or intensity after intervention."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "The front may change route or intensity after intervention."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 72, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-072", "ledger_sha256": "b0fbd62541dabdc8d510d5ad32b1dc44f472acc608050dc54d42064e8c5d4f98"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Weak Signal Triage", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:weak_signal_triage", "slug": "weak_signal_triage"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 4 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 4}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is polarization of attention. Ambiguous early signals are usually pushed into one of two bins: noise or crisis. In the first case, faint evidence disappears because it is not yet strong enough. In the second case, weak evidence is amplified into certainty because someone wants action, publicity, or justification.\n\nWeak Signal Triage introduces intermediate states. A signal can be retained without being believed, probed without being acted on, prepared for without being announced as likely, and retired without shame when evidence fades.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Subtle indicators of change are either dismissed as noise or amplified prematurely into certainty."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate.", "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "signal_decay_and_fadeout", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b072_a07_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A signal appears before the underlying change is confirmed. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A signal appears before the underlying change is confirmed."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Signal Decay and Fadeout", "one_liner": "Signals, influence, or effects systematically weaken over time or space.", "page_ref": "prime:signal_decay_and_fadeout", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "signal_decay_and_fadeout", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A signal appears before the underlying change is confirmed.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is adjacent but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "fast_path_slow_path_architecture"}], "residual_id": "r:weak_signal_triage:b072_a07_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b072_a07_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The cost of dismissing the signal and the cost of overreacting are both meaningful. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The cost of dismissing the signal and the cost of overreacting are both meaningful."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is adjacent but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "fast_path_slow_path_architecture"}], "normalized_requirement": "The cost of dismissing the signal and the cost of overreacting are both meaningful.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The cost of dismissing the signal and the cost of overreacting are both meaningful.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is adjacent but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "past_state_contamination"}], "residual_id": "r:weak_signal_triage:b072_a07_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b072_a07_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Evidence is sparse, indirect, contested, or source-dependent. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Evidence is sparse, indirect, contested, or source-dependent."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is adjacent but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "past_state_contamination"}], "normalized_requirement": "Evidence is sparse, indirect, contested, or source-dependent.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Evidence is sparse, indirect, contested, or source-dependent.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate.", "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "signal_decay_and_fadeout", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b072_a07_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Ambiguous early signals are usually pushed into one of two bins: noise or crisis. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Existing routines polarize signals into noise or crisis.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Existing routines polarize signals into noise or crisis.", "Ambiguous early signals are usually pushed into one of two bins: noise or crisis."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Signal Decay and Fadeout", "one_liner": "Signals, influence, or effects systematically weaken over time or space.", "page_ref": "prime:signal_decay_and_fadeout", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "signal_decay_and_fadeout", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Existing routines polarize signals into noise or crisis.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Response lead time matters.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Response lead time matters. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Response lead time matters."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "Response lead time matters."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 72, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-072", "ledger_sha256": "b0fbd62541dabdc8d510d5ad32b1dc44f472acc608050dc54d42064e8c5d4f98"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Welfare Analysis and Distributional Effects Assessment", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:welfare_analysis_and_distributional_effects_assessment", "slug": "welfare_analysis_and_distributional_effects_assessment"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 1, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 2, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 1, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "1 of 3 structural conditions is catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 3}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is aggregate masking. A decision can create real total gains while concentrating losses in places that are politically weak, operationally hidden, or normatively important. Average outcomes can improve while access, dignity, exposure, transition cost, or opportunity worsen for a subgroup.\n\nThe problem becomes sharper when baseline choice, time horizon, and value weights are left implicit. A proposal can seem welfare-positive under one comparison and unfair under another. This archetype makes those choices visible before the decision is accepted.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A decision is justified by aggregate improvement, efficiency, or Pareto-style reasoning while the distribution of benefits, burdens, risks, and remedies across affected parties remains hidden, under-specified, or normatively unexamined."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is adjacent but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "pareto_efficiency"}], "residual_id": "r:welfare_analysis_and_distributional_effects_assessment:b072_a08_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b072_a08_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A proposal can seem welfare-positive under one comparison and unfair under another. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A policy, design, restructuring, pricing change, or allocation is defended as efficient, cost-beneficial, Pareto-improving, or welfare-positive.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A policy, design, restructuring, pricing change, or allocation is defended as efficient, cost-beneficial, Pareto-improving, or welfare-positive.", "A proposal can seem welfare-positive under one comparison and unfair under another."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is adjacent but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "pareto_efficiency"}], "normalized_requirement": "A policy, design, restructuring, pricing change, or allocation is defended as efficient, cost-beneficial, Pareto-improving, or welfare-positive.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A policy, design, restructuring, pricing change, or allocation is defended as efficient, cost-beneficial, Pareto-improving, or welfare-positive.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate.", "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "distributional_effects", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b072_a08_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when a decision is justified by total surplus, net benefit, efficiency, average improvement, or Pareto-style reasoning, but the affected population is heterogeneous. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The affected population is heterogeneous and different groups experience different benefits, costs, risks, or transition burdens.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The affected population is heterogeneous and different groups experience different benefits, costs, risks, or transition burdens.", "Use this archetype when a decision is justified by total surplus, net benefit, efficiency, average improvement, or Pareto-style reasoning, but the affected population is heterogeneous."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Distributional Effects", "one_liner": "An aggregate outcome conceals systematically heterogeneous, unit-level changes.", "page_ref": "prime:distributional_effects", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "distributional_effects", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The affected population is heterogeneous and different groups experience different benefits, costs, risks, or transition burdens.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is adjacent but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "externality"}], "residual_id": "r:welfare_analysis_and_distributional_effects_assessment:b072_a08_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b072_a08_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially useful when costs can be shifted to users, workers, communities, future maintainers, or third parties outside the decision boundary. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The formal decision boundary excludes parties who may absorb spillovers, unpaid work, degraded access, or delayed costs.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The formal decision boundary excludes parties who may absorb spillovers, unpaid work, degraded access, or delayed costs.", "It is especially useful when costs can be shifted to users, workers, communities, future maintainers, or third parties outside the decision boundary."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is adjacent but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "externality"}], "normalized_requirement": "The formal decision boundary excludes parties who may absorb spillovers, unpaid work, degraded access, or delayed costs.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The formal decision boundary excludes parties who may absorb spillovers, unpaid work, degraded access, or delayed costs.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The decision involves public goods, externalities, infrastructure, essential services, employment, access, or rights-sensitive outcomes.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Average outcomes can improve while access, dignity, exposure, transition cost, or opportunity worsen for a subgroup. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The decision involves public goods, externalities, infrastructure, essential services, employment, access, or rights-sensitive outcomes. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The decision involves public goods, externalities, infrastructure, essential services, employment, access, or rights-sensitive outcomes.", "Average outcomes can improve while access, dignity, exposure, transition cost, or opportunity worsen for a subgroup."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 4, "text": "The decision involves public goods, externalities, infrastructure, essential services, employment, access, or rights-sensitive outcomes."}, {"display_text": "A compensation, mitigation, or transfer claim is used to justify a change that would otherwise create concentrated losses.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A decision can create real total gains while concentrating losses in places that are politically weak, operationally hidden, or normatively important. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: A compensation, mitigation, or transfer claim is used to justify a change that would otherwise create concentrated losses. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A compensation, mitigation, or transfer claim is used to justify a change that would otherwise create concentrated losses.", "A decision can create real total gains while concentrating losses in places that are politically weak, operationally hidden, or normatively important."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 5, "text": "A compensation, mitigation, or transfer claim is used to justify a change that would otherwise create concentrated losses."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 72, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-072", "ledger_sha256": "b0fbd62541dabdc8d510d5ad32b1dc44f472acc608050dc54d42064e8c5d4f98"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Whole-System Alignment", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:whole_system_alignment", "slug": "whole_system_alignment"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 3, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 3, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 3, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "3 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is **suboptimization**: parts optimize for local goals that are not equivalent to the health of the whole. This can happen even when no actor is malicious. A team rewarded for speed may create operational fragility. A department rewarded for throughput may create downstream rework. A supplier rewarded for unit cost may weaken resilience. A school rewarded for one score may narrow learning.\n\nThe underlying tension is that local decision-making is necessary, but local signals are incomplete. The whole is produced by interactions among parts, yet responsibility, measurement, incentives, and authority are often partitioned.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Parts of a system optimize locally, act independently, or follow fragmented metrics in ways that degrade emergent whole-system behavior, shift costs across boundaries, or make the larger system less viable even though each part may appear successful on its own terms."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate.", "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "goal_congruence_alignment", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b072_a09_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The pattern is especially relevant when teams, modules, agencies, departments, suppliers, disciplines, or ecological actors each improve their own metrics while the end-to-end outcome worsens. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Local units, teams, agencies, modules, species, markets, or subsystems can improve their own metrics while worsening end-to-end outcomes.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Local units, teams, agencies, modules, species, markets, or subsystems can improve their own metrics while worsening end-to-end outcomes.", "The pattern is especially relevant when teams, modules, agencies, departments, suppliers, disciplines, or ecological actors each improve their own metrics while the end-to-end outcome worsens."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Goal Congruence (Alignment)", "one_liner": "Alignment of objectives.", "page_ref": "prime:goal_congruence_alignment", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "goal_congruence_alignment", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Local units, teams, agencies, modules, species, markets, or subsystems can improve their own metrics while worsening end-to-end outcomes.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is adjacent but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "strategic_complementarity"}], "residual_id": "r:whole_system_alignment:b072_a09_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b072_a09_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The system needs local actors to make tractable, context-sensitive decisions, but those actors often see only local signals and are rewarded for local success. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The system has interdependencies, feedback loops, shared resources, cumulative effects, or delayed consequences that local actors do not fully see.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The system has interdependencies, feedback loops, shared resources, cumulative effects, or delayed consequences that local actors do not fully see.", "The system needs local actors to make tractable, context-sensitive decisions, but those actors often see only local signals and are rewarded for local success."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is adjacent but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "strategic_complementarity"}], "normalized_requirement": "The system has interdependencies, feedback loops, shared resources, cumulative effects, or delayed consequences that local actors do not fully see.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The system has interdependencies, feedback loops, shared resources, cumulative effects, or delayed consequences that local actors do not fully see.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate.", "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "goal_congruence_alignment", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b072_a09_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The whole is produced by interactions among parts, yet responsibility, measurement, incentives, and authority are often partitioned. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Responsibility is fragmented across parts, but outcomes are produced by the interaction among those parts.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Responsibility is fragmented across parts, but outcomes are produced by the interaction among those parts.", "The whole is produced by interactions among parts, yet responsibility, measurement, incentives, and authority are often partitioned."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Goal Congruence (Alignment)", "one_liner": "Alignment of objectives.", "page_ref": "prime:goal_congruence_alignment", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "goal_congruence_alignment", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Responsibility is fragmented across parts, but outcomes are produced by the interaction among those parts.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is adjacent but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "configuration_drift"}], "residual_id": "r:whole_system_alignment:b072_a09_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b072_a09_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when local optimization is visibly diverging from system-level health. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A local optimization transfers cost, risk, maintenance burden, delay, or harm to another part of the system.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A local optimization transfers cost, risk, maintenance burden, delay, or harm to another part of the system.", "Use this archetype when local optimization is visibly diverging from system-level health."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is adjacent but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "configuration_drift"}], "normalized_requirement": "A local optimization transfers cost, risk, maintenance burden, delay, or harm to another part of the system.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A local optimization transfers cost, risk, maintenance burden, delay, or harm to another part of the system.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate.", "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "goal_congruence_alignment", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b072_a09_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The whole depends on interactions among parts, yet responsibility, measurement, incentives, and authority are partitioned. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Metrics, incentives, budgets, or accountability rules reward part-level performance more strongly than whole-system viability.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Metrics, incentives, budgets, or accountability rules reward part-level performance more strongly than whole-system viability.", "The whole depends on interactions among parts, yet responsibility, measurement, incentives, and authority are partitioned."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Goal Congruence (Alignment)", "one_liner": "Alignment of objectives.", "page_ref": "prime:goal_congruence_alignment", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "goal_congruence_alignment", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Metrics, incentives, budgets, or accountability rules reward part-level performance more strongly than whole-system viability.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is adjacent but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "systemic_fragmentation"}], "residual_id": "r:whole_system_alignment:b072_a09_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b072_a09_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is weak when the system boundary is still undefined, when a one-time impact map is enough, or when the only intended change is a conversation or diagram. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Cross-boundary coordination is necessary, but existing interfaces, governance, or review rituals are too weak to reconcile tradeoffs.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Cross-boundary coordination is necessary, but existing interfaces, governance, or review rituals are too weak to reconcile tradeoffs.", "It is weak when the system boundary is still undefined, when a one-time impact map is enough, or when the only intended change is a conversation or diagram."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is adjacent but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "systemic_fragmentation"}], "normalized_requirement": "Cross-boundary coordination is necessary, but existing interfaces, governance, or review rituals are too weak to reconcile tradeoffs.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Cross-boundary coordination is necessary, but existing interfaces, governance, or review rituals are too weak to reconcile tradeoffs.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A proposed improvement in one area threatens system resilience, equity, safety, long-term sustainability, user experience, or lifecycle value.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is useful when the whole has real emergent properties: reliability, resilience, safety, ecosystem health, patient outcomes, learning, user experience, lifecycle value, or public trust. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: A proposed improvement in one area threatens system resilience, equity, safety, long-term sustainability, user experience, or lifecycle value. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A proposed improvement in one area threatens system resilience, equity, safety, long-term sustainability, user experience, or lifecycle value.", "It is useful when the whole has real emergent properties: reliability, resilience, safety, ecosystem health, patient outcomes, learning, user experience, lifecycle value, or public trust."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "A proposed improvement in one area threatens system resilience, equity, safety, long-term sustainability, user experience, or lifecycle value."}, {"display_text": "The system boundary is sufficiently defined that alignment can be attempted, but still broad enough to include the consequences that matter.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is weak when the system boundary is still undefined, when a one-time impact map is enough, or when the only intended change is a conversation or diagram. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: The system boundary is sufficiently defined that alignment can be attempted, but still broad enough to include the consequences that matter. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The system boundary is sufficiently defined that alignment can be attempted, but still broad enough to include the consequences that matter.", "It is weak when the system boundary is still undefined, when a one-time impact map is enough, or when the only intended change is a conversation or diagram."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 8, "text": "The system boundary is sufficiently defined that alignment can be attempted, but still broad enough to include the consequences that matter."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 72, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-072", "ledger_sha256": "b0fbd62541dabdc8d510d5ad32b1dc44f472acc608050dc54d42064e8c5d4f98"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Wild-Card Contingency Mapping", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:wild_card_contingency_mapping", "slug": "wild_card_contingency_mapping"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 5, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 5, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "5 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is rare-event neglect. Because a disruption is hard to estimate or uncomfortable to name, it is treated as outside planning. This creates a gap between imagination and readiness: people may be able to describe a shocking event, but they have not mapped how it would propagate, what capacities would fail, who would decide, or what options would still be available.\n\nThe opposite failure is panic overreaction. Once a vivid disruption is imagined, teams may treat it as inevitable and overfit planning around it. The archetype therefore needs both imaginative reach and plausibility discipline.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system ignores low-probability disruptive events because they are hard to forecast, uncomfortable to discuss, politically inconvenient, or outside normal planning assumptions."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate.", "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "wild_cards", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b072_a10_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "If the work is about comparing broad futures and choosing robust strategy, use Scenario Portfolio Planning. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Existing strategy assumes normal continuity or only models expected scenarios.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Existing strategy assumes normal continuity or only models expected scenarios.", "If the work is about comparing broad futures and choosing robust strategy, use Scenario Portfolio Planning."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Wild Cards", "one_liner": "Low-probability disruptions.", "page_ref": "prime:wild_cards", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "wild_cards", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Existing strategy assumes normal continuity or only models expected scenarios.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate.", "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "wild_cards", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b072_a10_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "It is especially relevant when the system needs lead time to arrange backup capacity, decision authority, supply alternatives, communication protocols, recovery routes, or reserves. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Preparedness requires lead time, authority, resources, contracts, reserves, or coordination that cannot be improvised during crisis.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Preparedness requires lead time, authority, resources, contracts, reserves, or coordination that cannot be improvised during crisis.", "It is especially relevant when the system needs lead time to arrange backup capacity, decision authority, supply alternatives, communication protocols, recovery routes, or reserves."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Wild Cards", "one_liner": "Low-probability disruptions.", "page_ref": "prime:wild_cards", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "wild_cards", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Preparedness requires lead time, authority, resources, contracts, reserves, or coordination that cannot be improvised during crisis.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate.", "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "wild_cards", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b072_a10_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Because a disruption is hard to estimate or uncomfortable to name, it is treated as outside planning. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Some wild-card possibilities are socially or politically difficult to name, so they are excluded from planning until too late.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Some wild-card possibilities are socially or politically difficult to name, so they are excluded from planning until too late.", "Because a disruption is hard to estimate or uncomfortable to name, it is treated as outside planning."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Wild Cards", "one_liner": "Low-probability disruptions.", "page_ref": "prime:wild_cards", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "wild_cards", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Some wild-card possibilities are socially or politically difficult to name, so they are excluded from planning until too late.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate.", "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "wild_cards", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b072_a10_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "If the work is about triaging ambiguous evidence that already exists, use Weak Signal Triage. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Potential precursors exist but are weak, ambiguous, or not connected to any readiness decision.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Potential precursors exist but are weak, ambiguous, or not connected to any readiness decision.", "If the work is about triaging ambiguous evidence that already exists, use Weak Signal Triage."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Wild Cards", "one_liner": "Low-probability disruptions.", "page_ref": "prime:wild_cards", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "wild_cards", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Potential precursors exist but are weak, ambiguous, or not connected to any readiness decision.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate.", "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "wild_cards", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b072_a10_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This creates a gap between imagination and readiness: people may be able to describe a shocking event, but they have not mapped how it would propagate, what capacities would fail, who would decide, or what options would still be available. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The system has resilience rhetoric but no concrete mapping from event classes to response options and readiness thresholds.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The system has resilience rhetoric but no concrete mapping from event classes to response options and readiness thresholds.", "This creates a gap between imagination and readiness: people may be able to describe a shocking event, but they have not mapped how it would propagate, what capacities would fail, who would decide, or what options would still be available."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Wild Cards", "one_liner": "Low-probability disruptions.", "page_ref": "prime:wild_cards", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "wild_cards", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The system has resilience rhetoric but no concrete mapping from event classes to response options and readiness thresholds.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "A disruption could have high consequence even if its probability is low or hard to estimate.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Because a disruption is hard to estimate or uncomfortable to name, it is treated as outside planning. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: A disruption could have high consequence even if its probability is low or hard to estimate. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A disruption could have high consequence even if its probability is low or hard to estimate.", "Because a disruption is hard to estimate or uncomfortable to name, it is treated as outside planning."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 1, "text": "A disruption could have high consequence even if its probability is low or hard to estimate."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 72, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-072", "ledger_sha256": "b0fbd62541dabdc8d510d5ad32b1dc44f472acc608050dc54d42064e8c5d4f98"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Windfall Discipline and Capacity Preservation", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:windfall_discipline_capacity_preservation", "slug": "windfall_discipline_capacity_preservation"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 4, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 1, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 4, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "4 of 5 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 5}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A system’s apparent strength, solvency, growth, legitimacy, or comfort is sustained by an easy inflow that is not sufficiently coupled to the performance and feedback loops that would ordinarily build or maintain capacity. As the inflow substitutes for earning, learning, maintenance, accountability, diversification, or adaptive effort, the system becomes brittle in proportion to the windfall it appears to enjoy.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system’s apparent strength, solvency, growth, legitimacy, or comfort is sustained by an easy inflow that is not sufficiently coupled to the performance and feedback loops that would ordinarily build or maintain capacity. As the inflow substitutes for earning, learning, maintenance, accountability, diversification, or adaptive effort, the system becomes brittle in proportion to the windfall it appears to enjoy."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate.", "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "unearned_windfall_mechanism_atrophy", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b072_a11_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system’s apparent strength, solvency, growth, legitimacy, or comfort is sustained by an easy inflow that is not sufficiently coupled to the performance and feedback loops that would ordinarily build or maintain capacity. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A large resource, revenue, attention, legitimacy, subsidy, inheritance, grant, royalty, monopoly rent, or growth-capital inflow arrives faster than endogenous capability grows.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A large resource, revenue, attention, legitimacy, subsidy, inheritance, grant, royalty, monopoly rent, or growth-capital inflow arrives faster than endogenous capability grows.", "A system’s apparent strength, solvency, growth, legitimacy, or comfort is sustained by an easy inflow that is not sufficiently coupled to the performance and feedback loops that would ordinarily build or maintain capacity."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Unearned Windfall Mechanism Atrophy", "one_liner": "An easy, abundant inflow of value uncoupled from performance atrophies the very mechanisms that performance would have built, leaving the system brittle in proportion to its windfall.", "page_ref": "prime:unearned_windfall_mechanism_atrophy", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "unearned_windfall_mechanism_atrophy", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A large resource, revenue, attention, legitimacy, subsidy, inheritance, grant, royalty, monopoly rent, or growth-capital inflow arrives faster than endogenous capability grows.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate.", "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "unearned_windfall_mechanism_atrophy", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b072_a11_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The windfall is real value and may be ethically or strategically useful, but because it bypasses ordinary performance coupling, it can replace the pressures that produced capability. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The inflow is weakly tied to current user value, citizen accountability, customer willingness, operating discipline, or mission performance.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The inflow is weakly tied to current user value, citizen accountability, customer willingness, operating discipline, or mission performance.", "The windfall is real value and may be ethically or strategically useful, but because it bypasses ordinary performance coupling, it can replace the pressures that produced capability."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Unearned Windfall Mechanism Atrophy", "one_liner": "An easy, abundant inflow of value uncoupled from performance atrophies the very mechanisms that performance would have built, leaving the system brittle in proportion to its windfall.", "page_ref": "prime:unearned_windfall_mechanism_atrophy", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "unearned_windfall_mechanism_atrophy", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The inflow is weakly tied to current user value, citizen accountability, customer willingness, operating discipline, or mission performance.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate.", "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "unearned_windfall_mechanism_atrophy", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b072_a11_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The windfall is real value and may be ethically or strategically useful, but because it bypasses ordinary performance coupling, it can replace the pressures that produced capability. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The system uses windfall to fund ordinary commitments, expansion, staffing, consumption, or prestige before post-windfall viability is tested.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The system uses windfall to fund ordinary commitments, expansion, staffing, consumption, or prestige before post-windfall viability is tested.", "The windfall is real value and may be ethically or strategically useful, but because it bypasses ordinary performance coupling, it can replace the pressures that produced capability."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Unearned Windfall Mechanism Atrophy", "one_liner": "An easy, abundant inflow of value uncoupled from performance atrophies the very mechanisms that performance would have built, leaving the system brittle in proportion to its windfall.", "page_ref": "prime:unearned_windfall_mechanism_atrophy", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "unearned_windfall_mechanism_atrophy", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The system uses windfall to fund ordinary commitments, expansion, staffing, consumption, or prestige before post-windfall viability is tested.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is adjacent but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "adaptive_capacity"}], "residual_id": "r:windfall_discipline_capacity_preservation:b072_a11_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b072_a11_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The windfall is real value and may be ethically or strategically useful, but because it bypasses ordinary performance coupling, it can replace the pressures that produced capability. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Stakeholders treat windfall-supported output as proof of durable capability.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders treat windfall-supported output as proof of durable capability.", "The windfall is real value and may be ethically or strategically useful, but because it bypasses ordinary performance coupling, it can replace the pressures that produced capability."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is adjacent but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "adaptive_capacity"}], "normalized_requirement": "Stakeholders treat windfall-supported output as proof of durable capability.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Stakeholders treat windfall-supported output as proof of durable capability.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate.", "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "unearned_windfall_mechanism_atrophy", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b072_a11_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The inflow is volatile, politically fragile, externally controlled, depletable, or concentrated in one source. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The inflow is volatile, politically fragile, externally controlled, depletable, or concentrated in one source."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Unearned Windfall Mechanism Atrophy", "one_liner": "An easy, abundant inflow of value uncoupled from performance atrophies the very mechanisms that performance would have built, leaving the system brittle in proportion to its windfall.", "page_ref": "prime:unearned_windfall_mechanism_atrophy", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "unearned_windfall_mechanism_atrophy", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The inflow is volatile, politically fragile, externally controlled, depletable, or concentrated in one source.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Capabilities that scarcity, feedback, competition, or maintenance pressure formerly exercised begin to weaken.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The windfall is real value and may be ethically or strategically useful, but because it bypasses ordinary performance coupling, it can replace the pressures that produced capability. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Capabilities that scarcity, feedback, competition, or maintenance pressure formerly exercised begin to weaken. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Capabilities that scarcity, feedback, competition, or maintenance pressure formerly exercised begin to weaken.", "The windfall is real value and may be ethically or strategically useful, but because it bypasses ordinary performance coupling, it can replace the pressures that produced capability."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 6, "text": "Capabilities that scarcity, feedback, competition, or maintenance pressure formerly exercised begin to weaken."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 72, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-072", "ledger_sha256": "b0fbd62541dabdc8d510d5ad32b1dc44f472acc608050dc54d42064e8c5d4f98"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Winner-Conditioned Valuation Correction", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:winner_conditioned_valuation_correction", "slug": "winner_conditioned_valuation_correction"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 7, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 1, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 0, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 7, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "7 of 7 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 1 of 1 sufficient condition sets is fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 7}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "An actor uses an unconditional value estimate to win a contested allocation even though winning is itself evidence that the actor may have overestimated a shared, uncertain value. The contest selects the most optimistic estimate and can convert selection success into overpayment, operational loss, reputational damage, or irreversible commitment.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "An actor uses an unconditional value estimate to win a contested allocation even though winning is itself evidence that the actor may have overestimated a shared, uncertain value. The contest selects the most optimistic estimate and can convert selection success into overpayment, operational loss, reputational damage, or irreversible commitment."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate.", "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "winner_s_curse", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b072_a12_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The actor must bid high enough to win, but the higher the bid must be to win a common-value contest, the stronger the evidence that the actor may be the most overoptimistic participant. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: The contested object has a substantial common-value component: the winner and losers would face broadly similar true value, cost, risk, or downstream obligation.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["The contested object has a substantial common-value component: the winner and losers would face broadly similar true value, cost, risk, or downstream obligation.", "The actor must bid high enough to win, but the higher the bid must be to win a common-value contest, the stronger the evidence that the actor may be the most overoptimistic participant."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Winner's Curse", "one_liner": "Winning a common-value contest is itself evidence of overpayment.", "page_ref": "prime:winner_s_curse", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "winner_s_curse", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The contested object has a substantial common-value component: the winner and losers would face broadly similar true value, cost, risk, or downstream obligation.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate.", "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "winner_s_curse", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b072_a12_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The actor must bid high enough to win, but the higher the bid must be to win a common-value contest, the stronger the evidence that the actor may be the most overoptimistic participant. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Participants hold noisy, incomplete, asymmetric, or strategically biased estimates of that common value.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Participants hold noisy, incomplete, asymmetric, or strategically biased estimates of that common value.", "The actor must bid high enough to win, but the higher the bid must be to win a common-value contest, the stronger the evidence that the actor may be the most overoptimistic participant."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Winner's Curse", "one_liner": "Winning a common-value contest is itself evidence of overpayment.", "page_ref": "prime:winner_s_curse", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "winner_s_curse", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Participants hold noisy, incomplete, asymmetric, or strategically biased estimates of that common value.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate.", "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "winner_s_curse", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b072_a12_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "An actor uses an unconditional value estimate to win a contested allocation even though winning is itself evidence that the actor may have overestimated a shared, uncertain value. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Winning commits the actor to a price, obligation, delivery promise, employment contract, acquisition, lease, project, or exposure before the true value is known.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Winning commits the actor to a price, obligation, delivery promise, employment contract, acquisition, lease, project, or exposure before the true value is known.", "An actor uses an unconditional value estimate to win a contested allocation even though winning is itself evidence that the actor may have overestimated a shared, uncertain value."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Winner's Curse", "one_liner": "Winning a common-value contest is itself evidence of overpayment.", "page_ref": "prime:winner_s_curse", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "winner_s_curse", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Winning commits the actor to a price, obligation, delivery promise, employment contract, acquisition, lease, project, or exposure before the true value is known.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate.", "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "winner_s_curse", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b072_a12_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The number, expertise, or information quality of rivals makes their refusal to continue bidding meaningful evidence. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The number, expertise, or information quality of rivals makes their refusal to continue bidding meaningful evidence."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Winner's Curse", "one_liner": "Winning a common-value contest is itself evidence of overpayment.", "page_ref": "prime:winner_s_curse", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "winner_s_curse", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The number, expertise, or information quality of rivals makes their refusal to continue bidding meaningful evidence.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate.", "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "winner_s_curse", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b072_a12_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Prestige, mandate pressure, fear of losing, escalation, or identity attachment makes the team eager to treat winning as proof of correctness. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Prestige, mandate pressure, fear of losing, escalation, or identity attachment makes the team eager to treat winning as proof of correctness."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Winner's Curse", "one_liner": "Winning a common-value contest is itself evidence of overpayment.", "page_ref": "prime:winner_s_curse", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "winner_s_curse", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Prestige, mandate pressure, fear of losing, escalation, or identity attachment makes the team eager to treat winning as proof of correctness.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate.", "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "winner_s_curse", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b072_a12_c7", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Post-win verification, renegotiation, or walkaway options are weak, costly, or socially illegitimate unless designed in advance. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Post-win verification, renegotiation, or walkaway options are weak, costly, or socially illegitimate unless designed in advance."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Winner's Curse", "one_liner": "Winning a common-value contest is itself evidence of overpayment.", "page_ref": "prime:winner_s_curse", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "winner_s_curse", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Post-win verification, renegotiation, or walkaway options are weak, costly, or socially illegitimate unless designed in advance.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [7], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate.", "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "winner_s_curse", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b072_a12_c8", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Past wins have produced disappointing returns, write-downs, delivery losses, overruns, or buyer’s remorse despite appearing rational at the time. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [8], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Past wins have produced disappointing returns, write-downs, delivery losses, overruns, or buyer’s remorse despite appearing rational at the time."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Winner's Curse", "one_liner": "Winning a common-value contest is itself evidence of overpayment.", "page_ref": "prime:winner_s_curse", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "winner_s_curse", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Past wins have produced disappointing returns, write-downs, delivery losses, overruns, or buyer’s remorse despite appearing rational at the time.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [8], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": true, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The allocation rule tends to award the object to the highest bidder, most aggressive applicant, most optimistic buyer, or most confident estimator.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The allocation rule tends to award the object to the highest bidder, most aggressive applicant, most optimistic buyer, or most confident estimator. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The allocation rule tends to award the object to the highest bidder, most aggressive applicant, most optimistic buyer, or most confident estimator."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 3, "text": "The allocation rule tends to award the object to the highest bidder, most aggressive applicant, most optimistic buyer, or most confident estimator."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 72, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-072", "ledger_sha256": "b0fbd62541dabdc8d510d5ad32b1dc44f472acc608050dc54d42064e8c5d4f98"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "FULLY_CATALOG_GROUNDED_SET", "explanation": "At least one sufficient condition set is fully represented by existing primes or domain-specific abstractions.", "label": "Complete catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Work-in-Progress Limiting", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:work_in_progress_limiting", "slug": "work_in_progress_limiting"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 0, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 6, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 0, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "0 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "The structural problem is over-admission into active status. A system can accept too many active commitments even if its formal backlog is well organized. Once this happens, work waits inside the active state. People and systems switch among partial obligations, handoffs multiply, decisions stall, and progress becomes fragmented.\n\nThe paradox is that starting more work often feels responsive. It gives stakeholders an immediate visible signal that their request matters. But every active item consumes capacity even when little is happening. The more active obligations accumulate, the less capacity remains to finish any one of them.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A system starts more work than it can advance, causing context switching, long cycle times, hidden queues, partial completion, quality erosion, and incomplete commitments."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is adjacent but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "operational_period"}], "residual_id": "r:work_in_progress_limiting:b072_a13_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b072_a13_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Use this archetype when the system has too many active items and completion suffers. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Many items are marked active, in progress, open, assigned, started, under review, or being executed at the same time.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Many items are marked active, in progress, open, assigned, started, under review, or being executed at the same time.", "Use this archetype when the system has too many active items and completion suffers."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is adjacent but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "operational_period"}], "normalized_requirement": "Many items are marked active, in progress, open, assigned, started, under review, or being executed at the same time.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Many items are marked active, in progress, open, assigned, started, under review, or being executed at the same time.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is adjacent but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "gradual_deterioration"}], "residual_id": "r:work_in_progress_limiting:b072_a13_c2", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b072_a13_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Cycle time rises even though people, machines, or teams appear constantly busy. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Cycle time rises even though people, machines, or teams appear constantly busy."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is adjacent but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "gradual_deterioration"}], "normalized_requirement": "Cycle time rises even though people, machines, or teams appear constantly busy.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Cycle time rises even though people, machines, or teams appear constantly busy.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is adjacent but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "operational_period"}], "residual_id": "r:work_in_progress_limiting:b072_a13_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b072_a13_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Once this happens, work waits inside the active state. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Work waits inside active status because owners are switching among too many items.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Work waits inside active status because owners are switching among too many items.", "Once this happens, work waits inside the active state."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is adjacent but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "operational_period"}], "normalized_requirement": "Work waits inside active status because owners are switching among too many items.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Work waits inside active status because owners are switching among too many items.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is adjacent but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "refinement"}], "residual_id": "r:work_in_progress_limiting:b072_a13_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b072_a13_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The paradox is that starting more work often feels responsive. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: New work is easier to start than old work is to complete, unblock, or close.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["New work is easier to start than old work is to complete, unblock, or close.", "The paradox is that starting more work often feels responsive."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is adjacent but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "refinement"}], "normalized_requirement": "New work is easier to start than old work is to complete, unblock, or close.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "New work is easier to start than old work is to complete, unblock, or close.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is adjacent but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "decoupling_point"}], "residual_id": "r:work_in_progress_limiting:b072_a13_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b072_a13_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Downstream stages are overwhelmed by partially prepared handoffs from upstream stages. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Downstream stages are overwhelmed by partially prepared handoffs from upstream stages."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is adjacent but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "decoupling_point"}], "normalized_requirement": "Downstream stages are overwhelmed by partially prepared handoffs from upstream stages.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Downstream stages are overwhelmed by partially prepared handoffs from upstream stages.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is adjacent but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "stage_gate_process"}], "residual_id": "r:work_in_progress_limiting:b072_a13_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b072_a13_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A system starts more work than it can advance, causing context switching, long cycle times, hidden queues, partial completion, quality erosion, and incomplete commitments. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Stakeholders mistake a started item for a real commitment even when the system cannot advance it promptly.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders mistake a started item for a real commitment even when the system cannot advance it promptly.", "A system starts more work than it can advance, causing context switching, long cycle times, hidden queues, partial completion, quality erosion, and incomplete commitments."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is adjacent but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "stage_gate_process"}], "normalized_requirement": "Stakeholders mistake a started item for a real commitment even when the system cannot advance it promptly.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Stakeholders mistake a started item for a real commitment even when the system cannot advance it promptly.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Queueing and backlog visibility reveal that active status has become another hidden waiting state.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The structural problem is over-admission into active status. In this archetype, the relevant contextual consideration is: Queueing and backlog visibility reveal that active status has become another hidden waiting state. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Queueing and backlog visibility reveal that active status has become another hidden waiting state.", "The structural problem is over-admission into active status."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "Queueing and backlog visibility reveal that active status has become another hidden waiting state."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 72, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-072", "ledger_sha256": "b0fbd62541dabdc8d510d5ad32b1dc44f472acc608050dc54d42064e8c5d4f98"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "NO_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "None of the structural conditions is currently represented by an accepted prime or domain-specific abstraction.", "label": "No catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Workaround Governance", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:workaround_governance", "slug": "workaround_governance"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "Formal systems describe how work should happen. Actual environments contain interruptions, exceptions, scarcity, shifting demand, incomplete tools, conflicting metrics, and embodied expertise. Practitioners adapt. Over time, some adaptations become dependable enough that work cannot proceed without them, even though they remain undocumented or unauthorized.\n\nThe resulting double system has characteristic pathologies. The official route carries authority but may not carry the work. The unofficial route carries the work but may not carry safeguards, ownership, equal access, or traceability. Leaders see noncompliance; practitioners see survival. Each perspective is partial.\n\nThe hardest cases combine genuine value and genuine risk. A shared credential may restore incident-response speed while destroying attribution. A paper note may preserve care during a device failure while creating reconciliation errors. An unofficial expert route may help exceptional applicants while excluding people who do not know the gatekeeper. A bypassed interlock may prevent nuisance shutdowns while exposing workers to catastrophic harm.\n\nThe structural problem is therefore not simply a gap between policy and behavior. It is an unresolved governance state in which the organization has not decided what the deviation is, why it persists, who may use it, what function it preserves, what harm it creates, or how the formal system will change. Until those questions are answered, both blanket enforcement and informal tolerance remain brittle.", "explanation_source": {"field": "prose_structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "Actual work repeatedly departs from official rules, tools, roles, or sequences because formal arrangements do not fit operational reality. The deviations may preserve service, safety, speed, dignity, or continuity, yet they can also create hidden hazards, unequal burdens, accountability gaps, security exposure, data loss, or process drift. Because workarounds are informal, the organization cannot reliably distinguish adaptive resilience from normalized deviance or decide who may continue, modify, formalize, or stop them."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is adjacent but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "inquiry_change_learning_loop"}], "residual_id": "r:workaround_governance:b072_a14_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b072_a14_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A deviation recurs across cases, shifts, sites, teams, or practitioners. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A deviation recurs across cases, shifts, sites, teams, or practitioners."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is adjacent but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "inquiry_change_learning_loop"}], "normalized_requirement": "A deviation recurs across cases, shifts, sites, teams, or practitioners.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A deviation recurs across cases, shifts, sites, teams, or practitioners.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate.", "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "procedure_work_mismatch", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b072_a14_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The official route carries authority but may not carry the work. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: Official compliance would make important work impossible or predictably harmful.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["Official compliance would make important work impossible or predictably harmful.", "The official route carries authority but may not carry the work."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Procedure-Work Mismatch", "one_liner": "A system's prescribed model of how work happens diverges systematically from how work is actually done, with the gap often load-bearing for performance, so the question is how the gap is managed rather than whether it can be eliminated.", "page_ref": "prime:procedure_work_mismatch", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "procedure_work_mismatch", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Official compliance would make important work impossible or predictably harmful.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate.", "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "procedure_work_mismatch", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b072_a14_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: A workaround produces material value but lacks authority or safeguards. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["A workaround produces material value but lacks authority or safeguards."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Procedure-Work Mismatch", "one_liner": "A system's prescribed model of how work happens diverges systematically from how work is actually done, with the gap often load-bearing for performance, so the question is how the gap is managed rather than whether it can be eliminated.", "page_ref": "prime:procedure_work_mismatch", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "procedure_work_mismatch", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "A workaround produces material value but lacks authority or safeguards.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is adjacent but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "backcasting"}], "residual_id": "r:workaround_governance:b072_a14_c4", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b072_a14_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Leaders propose suppression before understanding causal demand. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Leaders propose suppression before understanding causal demand."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is adjacent but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "backcasting"}], "normalized_requirement": "Leaders propose suppression before understanding causal demand.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Leaders propose suppression before understanding causal demand.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is adjacent but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "inquiry_change_learning_loop"}], "residual_id": "r:workaround_governance:b072_a14_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b072_a14_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Informal exceptions spread unevenly. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Informal exceptions spread unevenly."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is adjacent but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "inquiry_change_learning_loop"}], "normalized_requirement": "Informal exceptions spread unevenly.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Informal exceptions spread unevenly.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is adjacent but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "inquiry_change_learning_loop"}], "residual_id": "r:workaround_governance:b072_a14_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b072_a14_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "Over time, some adaptations become dependable enough that work cannot proceed without them, even though they remain undocumented or unauthorized. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: A regulated or safety-critical system relies on undocumented adaptations.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["A regulated or safety-critical system relies on undocumented adaptations.", "Over time, some adaptations become dependable enough that work cannot proceed without them, even though they remain undocumented or unauthorized."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is adjacent but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "inquiry_change_learning_loop"}], "normalized_requirement": "A regulated or safety-critical system relies on undocumented adaptations.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "A regulated or safety-critical system relies on undocumented adaptations.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "The organization has repeated cycles of bypass, crackdown, and reappearance.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: The organization has repeated cycles of bypass, crackdown, and reappearance. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The organization has repeated cycles of bypass, crackdown, and reappearance."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "The organization has repeated cycles of bypass, crackdown, and reappearance."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 72, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-072", "ledger_sha256": "b0fbd62541dabdc8d510d5ad32b1dc44f472acc608050dc54d42064e8c5d4f98"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}
{"archetype": {"name": "Yield Loss Attribution", "page_ref": "solution_archetype:yield_loss_attribution", "slug": "yield_loss_attribution"}, "artifact_type": "SOLUTION_ARCHETYPE_TRIGGER_PRESENTATION_PROJECTION", "coverage": {"catalog_grounded_conditions": 2, "condition_sets": 1, "dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "fully_catalog_grounded_condition_sets": 0, "non_abstraction_reclassified_conditions": 0, "open_conditions": 4, "partially_dsa_grounded_conditions": 0, "prime_grounded_conditions": 2, "source_review_conditions": 0, "statement": "2 of 6 structural conditions are catalog-grounded; 0 of 1 sufficient condition sets are fully grounded.", "structural_conditions": 6}, "diagnostic_problem": {"explanation": "A process, transformation, pathway, campaign, experiment, production line, data pipeline, biological recovery process, or program reports an aggregate yield, but the shortfall from its theoretical or intended output is treated as a vague efficiency problem. Without a closed accounting basis, teams chase anecdotes, optimize visible symptoms, double count losses, or improve one stage while hiding losses elsewhere.", "explanation_source": {"field": "structural_problem", "kind": "AUTHORED_ARCHETYPE_FIELD"}, "summary": "A process, transformation, pathway, campaign, experiment, production line, data pipeline, biological recovery process, or program reports an aggregate yield, but the shortfall from its theoretical or intended output is treated as a vague efficiency problem. Without a closed accounting basis, teams chase anecdotes, optimize visible symptoms, double count losses, or improve one stage while hiding losses elsewhere."}, "expression": {"between_sets_operator": null, "condition_sets": [{"audit": {"removal_argument": "Greedy removal of any literal drops a stated diagnostic-head obligation or its load-bearing relation.", "sufficiency_argument": "The listed structural atoms and explicit positive residuals jointly entail the remedy-free diagnostic head."}, "condition_set_id": "B1", "conditions": [{"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is adjacent but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "margin_of_safety"}], "residual_id": "r:yield_loss_attribution:b072_a15_c1", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b072_a15_c1", "explanation": {"paragraph": "A process, transformation, pathway, campaign, experiment, production line, data pipeline, biological recovery process, or program reports an aggregate yield, but the shortfall from its theoretical or intended output is treated as a vague efficiency problem. The narrower requirement in this condition set is: There is a credible theoretical maximum, design target, stoichiometric ceiling, capacity-normalized reference, or expected output under stated assumptions.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [1], "source_kind": "AUTHORED_CONTEXT_SYNTHESIS", "source_texts": ["There is a credible theoretical maximum, design target, stoichiometric ceiling, capacity-normalized reference, or expected output under stated assumptions.", "A process, transformation, pathway, campaign, experiment, production line, data pipeline, biological recovery process, or program reports an aggregate yield, but the shortfall from its theoretical or intended output is treated as a vague efficiency problem."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is adjacent but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "margin_of_safety"}], "normalized_requirement": "There is a credible theoretical maximum, design target, stoichiometric ceiling, capacity-normalized reference, or expected output under stated assumptions.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "There is a credible theoretical maximum, design target, stoichiometric ceiling, capacity-normalized reference, or expected output under stated assumptions.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [1], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate.", "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "yield_loss", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b072_a15_c2", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Realized output is measurably below that maximum or target. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [2], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Realized output is measurably below that maximum or target."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Yield Loss", "one_liner": "The gap between a transformation's theoretical maximum output and its realized output, decomposed under a balance constraint into named loss channels that sum to the deficit and can be ranked and attacked.", "page_ref": "prime:yield_loss", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "yield_loss", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "Realized output is measurably below that maximum or target.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [2], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is adjacent but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "source_sink_role"}], "residual_id": "r:yield_loss_attribution:b072_a15_c3", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b072_a15_c3", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Inputs, outputs, side outputs, rejects, waste streams, dropouts, leaks, or residues can be bounded within an accounting perimeter. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [3], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Inputs, outputs, side outputs, rejects, waste streams, dropouts, leaks, or residues can be bounded within an accounting perimeter."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is adjacent but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "source_sink_role"}], "normalized_requirement": "Inputs, outputs, side outputs, rejects, waste streams, dropouts, leaks, or residues can be bounded within an accounting perimeter.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Inputs, outputs, side outputs, rejects, waste streams, dropouts, leaks, or residues can be bounded within an accounting perimeter.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [3], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"primes": [{"argument": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate.", "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "yield_loss", "tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER"}], "type": "PRIME_SET"}}, "condition_id": "b072_a15_c4", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The deficit can plausibly be partitioned into multiple loss channels rather than explained by one known constraint. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [4], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The deficit can plausibly be partitioned into multiple loss channels rather than explained by one known constraint."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "PRIME_GROUNDED", "groundings": [{"authoritative_provenance": "PRIME_RELINK_LEDGER", "catalog_type": "PRIME", "edge_tier": "PROVISIONAL_TRIGGER", "name": "Yield Loss", "one_liner": "The gap between a transformation's theoretical maximum output and its realized output, decomposed under a balance constraint into named loss channels that sum to the deficit and can be ranked and attacked.", "page_ref": "prime:yield_loss", "qualifier": null, "role_mapping": "Source roles align to the prime's required relation.", "slug": "yield_loss", "source_unit_id": null, "why_it_fits": "The prime's mandatory structure entails the predicate."}], "open_issue": null, "predicate": "The deficit can plausibly be partitioned into multiple loss channels rather than explained by one known constraint.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [4], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is adjacent but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "defense_in_depth"}], "residual_id": "r:yield_loss_attribution:b072_a15_c5", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b072_a15_c5", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: The channels need to be ranked because resources cannot attack every loss at once. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [5], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["The channels need to be ranked because resources cannot attack every loss at once."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is adjacent but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "defense_in_depth"}], "normalized_requirement": "The channels need to be ranked because resources cannot attack every loss at once.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "The channels need to be ranked because resources cannot attack every loss at once.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [5], "supporting_groundings": []}, {"audit_history": {"dsa_atomic_units": [], "prime_relink_representation": {"dsa_catalog_status": "NOT_APPLICABLE", "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is adjacent but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "funnel_analysis"}], "residual_id": "r:yield_loss_attribution:b072_a15_c6", "residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "type": "RESIDUAL", "why_residual": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom."}}, "condition_id": "b072_a15_c6", "explanation": {"paragraph": "This is a load-bearing situation condition in the diagnostic expression. The condition is: Stakeholders are tempted to call the gap generic waste, inefficiency, failure, or noise without closing the balance. If it does not hold, this particular condition set is incomplete.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [6], "source_kind": "GENERATED_LOGIC_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Stakeholders are tempted to call the gap generic waste, inefficiency, failure, or noise without closing the balance."]}, "function": "STRUCTURAL_TRIGGER", "grounding_status": "OPEN", "groundings": [], "open_issue": {"dsa_review": {"eligible_units": 0, "non_abstraction_units": 0, "resolved_units": 0, "source_defect_units": 0, "status": "NOT_IN_RECONCILIATION_POPULATION", "unresolved_units": 0}, "nearest_primes": [{"falls_short_because": "The candidate is adjacent but does not universally entail the full predicate.", "slug": "funnel_analysis"}], "normalized_requirement": "Stakeholders are tempted to call the gap generic waste, inefficiency, failure, or noise without closing the balance.", "prior_prime_residual_kind": "COMPOSITE_UNRESOLVED", "research_disposition": "NOT_CHECKED_IN_DSA_RECONCILIATION", "why_open": "Complete v1.1 shortlist triage plus the v1.2 packet-pool scan found no candidate whose mandatory structure universally entails this atom. This residual was outside the completed existing-DSA reconciliation population."}, "predicate": "Stakeholders are tempted to call the gap generic waste, inefficiency, failure, or noise without closing the balance.", "scope": "ATOM", "source_conditions": [6], "supporting_groundings": []}], "fully_catalog_grounded": false, "label": "All conditions required", "within_set_operator": "AND"}], "condition_structure": "CONJUNCTIVE", "within_sets_operator": "AND"}, "method_versions": {"dsa_reconciliation": "dsa-reconciliation-production-v2", "presentation": "trigger-presentation-v2.1", "prime_relink": "production-v1.2"}, "other_requirements_and_context": [{"display_text": "Improvements must be verified against the whole yield, not only against a local metric.", "explanation": {"paragraph": "The source identifies this contextual consideration: Improvements must be verified against the whole yield, not only against a local metric. It helps interpret the situation or strengthens the practical case for examining the archetype.", "semantic_guardrail": "PRESENTATION_ONLY_NO_LOGIC_CHANGE", "source_condition_indexes": [7], "source_kind": "GENERATED_ROLE_CLARIFICATION", "source_texts": ["Improvements must be verified against the whole yield, not only against a local metric."]}, "function": "SUPPORTING_CONTEXT", "separation_note": "This is separate from the trigger expression because it may accompany or help interpret the situation, but it is not a load-bearing condition in a sufficient diagnostic set.", "source_condition_index": 7, "text": "Improvements must be verified against the whole yield, not only against a local metric."}], "presentation_policy": {"candidate_decision_ledgers_default_hidden": true, "explanations_may_not_change_logic": true, "grounding_is_not_confidence": true, "predicate_is_authoritative": true, "supporting_context_is_not_trigger": true}, "projection_version": "2.1", "provenance": {"archetype_catalog_sha256": "1cffb9fb0ee7d7bb89ec9c9386f4cc70007bbc50ca289db348a2a25164ad396e", "base_projection": {"batch": 72, "ledger_id": "production-v1.2-batch-072", "ledger_sha256": "b0fbd62541dabdc8d510d5ad32b1dc44f472acc608050dc54d42064e8c5d4f98"}, "base_projection_sha256": "06be4876ff861de90f93402045ac6456feeeae9017539859b51235d8bee64802", "dsa_catalog_sha256": "8bf8df23ac7bc6e841bcc68b4ebe011202aa5c8126cc5a9c09d85b80a9dd860b", "dsa_projection_sha256": "b8df8f0f4d6c02adaf7cea690ba07599270554cd10a8880d322a10c3eb44ca04", "prime_catalog_sha256": "170d1ce3eca8af32b19d621ede02667a22123ed0b106eff9039d8aee8bdded65"}, "representation_status": {"code": "PARTIAL_CATALOG_GROUNDING", "explanation": "Some structural conditions are represented by existing abstractions, but no sufficient condition set is fully represented.", "label": "Partial catalog grounding"}, "supporting_context_groundings": []}